HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/10/16 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CI`T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETYNGB
lat and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
October 16, 1991
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91930
•~~
City Councllmembers
Demva L. Stout, Mayor
William J. Alesender, Coancilmember
Charles J. Buquet, Coancilmember
Diane Williams, Councifinember
Pamela J. Wright, Caancllmem6er
•-~
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, Clly Ateorney
Debra J. Adams, Cpy clerk
City CkSce: 989.1851
/ PA
c~_'Y~
y~y '
'(~~j City Council Agenda
October 16, 1991 1
All itau submitUd for the Citp Council Agenda moat be in
xrit ing. xhe deadline for submitting chess hems i• 5:00 p.m.
on the Wednesday prior to tDe meeting. Ths City Clark's
office receives all such items.
A. CALL TO ORDBR
THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECONVENE AT TEI9 TI103.
0. ANNOVNCENENTB/PRESENTATZONS
1. Presentation of Proclamation to the Rancho Grande
%iwanie in Recognition of Che Award Received for a
Scholarship Program in conjunction with Lhe Community
Bervicee Department.
2. Presentaiion of Proclamation Observing Aed Ribbon Week,
October 19-27, 1991.
3. Presentation of Proclamat lon Observing California
Planning Week, October 20-26, 1991.
4. Announcement of Red RSbDOn week special Community
Presentation on Substance Abuts: Sign e, Symptoms and
PYevent ion.
C. COMNVNICATIONBC. FR~TRB PVBLICPUBLIC
Thi• i• the time and place for the general public Lo sddres•
the Clty Council. State lax prohiDiG the CSLy Council frw
addressing any issue not previously included on Lhm Agenda.
The City Couvcil map receive teatimovy avd set the utter for
e aubuquevt uetivg. Cosanta ere to ba limited to five
minutes per ivdividuel.
p. COn~cALE~~
TDe folloxivg Covaevt Calavdar items era espactad to be
routine and non-controversial. Thep x111 be acted upon by the
Council at one time without discussion. Any item map De
removed by a Councilumber or member of the audievice for
diacuuiov.
1. Approval of Ninutee: September 18, 1991
October 2, 1991
(BUquet abeent(
PA
' City Council Agenda
OcCOber 16, 1991 2
2. Approval of Warrant e, Regiatez Nos. 9/25/91, 10/2/91, 1
and 10/9/91, and Payroll ending 9/26/91 for the total
amount of $2,628,266.97.
3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 16
ae of September 30, 1991.
4. Alcoholic Beverage Application foz Off Sale Beer 6 Wine 20
far Village Mini Mart, Marla Hamld, 7270 Victoria Park
Lana.
5. Alcoholle Beverage Application for OEf Sale Beer 6 Wine 22
for Unnamed Business, Theodore S. Oe eonis, 8111 B.
FauDion, and Lomenich Rotella Jr., 10431 Lemon Street,
Su Lte N.
6. Approval of Resolution declaring the results of a 2Q
special election fOr CPO 88-2, Annexation Numbez 1 (Law
Enfomevreni ~ .
RESOLUTION NO. 91-294 25
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
OECLARI NG 2HE RESULTS OF A "MELLO-A004
COMMUNITY PACILITIES ACT OP 1982^ SPECIAL
TAX ELECTION
7. Approval of a Tzalla Implementalion Plan, 8 27
comprehensive implementer ion strategy for hiking, riding
and biking trails wtthln the community.
RESOLUTION N0. 91-262 31
A RESOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA,
APPROVING THE TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
8. Approval of Oiepoe it ton of excess property £or a portion 33
of 25th Street, located west of Et iwanda Avenue (APN:
225-082-01).
PA E
~[~ CiCY Council Agenda
October 16, 1991 3
3Q
RESOLUTTON N0. 91-295
A AEBOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE
SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAXONGA AND AUTHORI EING AND DIRECTING THE
HAYOA AND CITY CLERE TO EXECUTE THAT
CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF HFIICH IS ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXH181T "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAYE
TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED
THEREIN
9. Approvnl of Map, execution of improvement Agreement antl 39
Improvement Eecur it tee Eor on-site public improvements
for Tract 14139, Joint Improvement Agreement and
Improvement Securit tee wish AhmaneOn Deve lopmenb and
Nett Inland Empire, Tncorporaied, Eor off-site
improvements for Tract Nob. 14139, 14379 and 14380,
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
D ie<rict NO. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance O1eCiict
Noa. 1 and 7 far tract 14139 located on the eoutAweet
corner of 24th Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by
Ahmanson Developments.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-296 41
A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECUAIT IES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND THE FINAL MAP
OF TRACT 14139
RESOLUTION N0. 91-297 (}z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
^I51'R ICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14139
P E
Sl fe
2~,(~~ City Council Agenda
October 16, 2991 4
44
10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Securit iee for on-ails public improvements for Tracts
16379 and 14380 (Tentative Tract 13527), Joint
improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities with
Watt Inland Empita, Incorporated and Ahnaneon
Developments for off-site lmpcovementa foe Tract Noe.
16379, 16380 and 14139, ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Dietrici Noe. 1 and 7 for Traci Noe. 14379
and 14380 located on the north aide of 24th street, west
of Etiwanda Avenue submitted 6y Watt Inland Empire,
Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-298 4~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CLTY COUNCIL OF THS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT ANO SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF
TRACT NOS. 16379 ANO 14380
RESOLUTLON NO. 91-299 Q$
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi
CSTY OA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTR ICT
NO. 7 AND STREHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 16379
AND 14380
11. Approval to execute improvement Agreement, Improvement 5Q
Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance Dletrict No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Dletrict Noe. 1 and 6 for CUP 91-11, located
at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street, submitted
by James and Patricia Manhire.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-300 51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCZL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PHRMIT NO. 91-11
PA e
`i
Z~ City Council Agenda
`~ October 16, 1991 5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-301 52
A RESOLUTION OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DTETRZCT
N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING DISSRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 POR CUP 91-11
12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 55
Tract 13566-1, located on the south side of Summit
Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and cherry Avenue,
submitted by Aock£Seld Development.
AESOLVTIOM NO. 91-302 6$
A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNB
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING 2MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1
13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 59
Tract 13566-1 and -3, located on the south sLde of
summit Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and San
Sevaine Road, euDmitted by The Caryn Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-303 61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSIDN
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1
AND -3
14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 62
Tract 13727, locatetl on the southwest corner of
Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue, submitted Dy
Southland Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-304 64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSZON
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13727
15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 65
Tract 13753 Landscape, located on the northeast corner
of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by the
Wllllam Lyon Company.
i_1~~( 'JJ', City Council Agenda
V
`~ October 16, 1991 6
RESOLUTION NO. 91-305 6]
A RESOLVTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCMO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13753
LANDSCAPE
16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension Eor 68
Tract 13812 located on Che west Bide of Etiwanda Avenue
between Summit Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by
Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-306 ]0
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13812
17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for ]1
DR 87-S6r located on the aouthweet corner of Rochester
Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, eu bm fitted by Stanton Jersey
Partners.
RESOLUTION N0. 91-307 ]3
A REEOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENS ION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-56
18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for ]Q
DA 89-14, located on the south aide of Arrow Route EaeC
of Interstate-15 Freeway, auDmitted Dy Ampac,
Incorporated.
RESOLVT ION NO. 91-308 ](
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 89-14
19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for ]]
Parcel Map 12854, located on Che we et aide of Eaet
Avenue between Catalpa Street and Victoria Street,
eubmitted by Style Homes.
PA
L/
( ~ City Council Agenda
October 16, 1991 7
RESOLUTION NO. 91-309 )9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP
128$4
20. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Bonds and $Q
Notice of CompleCLon for Tract 12420, located at the
southwest corns[ of Hellman Avenue and 7th Siieet.
Release:
Faithful Performance Hond (Street) $300,000 .00
Accept:
Maintenance Guaranies eontl (Street) $ 30,000 .00
RESOLUTION N0. 91-269 $i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC SMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
12420 AND AUTHOR RING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORK
21. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Bonds and $p
Notice of Completion foe Tract 13367, located on the
east aide of Hellman Avenue at Highland Avenue.
Release:
Fa It hful Performance Hond (Street) 5298,819. 00
Accept:
Maintenance Gua[antea Bond (Street) $ 29,882. 00
RESOLUTION N0. 91-310 $$
A REEOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
13367 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
22. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bontle and
Notice of Completion for 7645 Alta Cueata, located
on $4
Alta Cueata Drive between Camino Su[ and Valle Vi sta
Drive.
~
]]
yy A
~_~yy
~~
~~
99
~(~~~ CitY Council Agenda
October 16r 1991 8
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (street) $ 3,800.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-313 H6
A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COVNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PV BL IC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 7645
ALTA CUESTA AND AUTHORIZING THE FIL INC OF A
NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOA THE WORR
23. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond £or Tract $6
12577, located at Pilgrims Court and 19th St lest.
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street( 5 17,900.00
24. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract $J
}2969, located on Edwin Street South of Arrow Highway.
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street( $ 11r 300.00
25. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract $$
13445, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Patk
Lane and Rochester Avenue.
Aelea9e:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 72,400.00
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public besriags at the ties
of first rudiag. Second read tags are erpectsd to bs routine
and eon-controversial. They will be aaUd upon by the Council
ai one tLe Without discuuioa. Tha Cily CLrk Will read the
tLtle. Ray Stec sea ba reeoved for dlsnuuion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PVBLIC HEARINGS
Tha following items have been advertised end/or poatad as
puhlLc hearings as required Dy lew~ The Chair will open the
seating Lo receive public tutimony.
3. CONSIDERATION OF RECREATIONAL-VEHICLE STORAGE - Review 89
of cuitent City regal aticne affecting storage and
perking of RecreatLOnel Vehicles on private zee idential
propert tee. (COOtiaued [roe August 21, 1991)
PA
~ ~ City Council Agenda
n October 16, 1991 9
2. CONSIDERATION TO VACATE REID AVENUE - A request io 10~
vacate Aeid Avenue, locetad south of Main Street and
as at of Archibald Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-312 108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OP REID
AVENVE
3. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S 112
PLACE - Coneidereiion of an appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to revoke Conditional Use Permit
7H-03 for the operation of a bar in conjunction with e
restaurant located in the Neighborhood Commercial
District at 6620 Carnellan Street, northwest corner of
19th and Carnellan Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through
60. (STA!! REQUESTS THIS ITEM BS CONTINUED TO N0V00ER
20, 1991)
4. CON T ON O N M CONOITIONA VSE P RM T 7E Z
03 - SAM'S PLACE - Cone iperation of an appeal of the ]]
Planning Commission's decision to deny the request to
extend the hours of operation and amend the condition of
approval prohibiting live entertainment for an exist ing
restaurant and bar located Ln the Neighborhood
Commercial District et 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest
corner of 19th end Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56
through 60. (BTAlD REQVEETS TBI9 ITEM RE CONTINUED TO
NOVEMBER 20, 1991)
5. CONSIOfiRATION OP ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SA 'S ]]Z
PLACE - Cons ideret ion of an Appeal of the Planning
Conmieeion'e decision to deny the request to conduct
1LVe entertainment in conjunction with a restaurant and
bar located In the Neighborhood commercial District at
6620 Carnelian Street, northwest earner of 19th and
Carnelian Streets -APN: 201-511-66 through 60. (STA!!
REQUESTS TEIB ITEM EE CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 20, 1991)
6. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 114
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - Coneidernt ion of a request to amend Tlt le
17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
tc eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the
e[andard else perking apace to 8.5 feet by 18 feet.
PA
l
S
2 City Council Agenda
1 October 16, 1991 10
ORDINANCE No. 462 (first reading) 149
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01,
AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12 OP THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE,
ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES AND
REDUCING THE STANDARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO
B.5 FEET BY 18 FEET, AND HARING PINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOP
7. CO N O N A 5 SM NT 114
SPECIFIC PLAN AMHNDMENT 91-01 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA
- Coneitleration o£ a request to amend Part III oC the
Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking
spaces.
ORDINANCE NO. 463 (first reading) 153
AN OAD INANCB OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA,
APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIH INATINC COMPACT
PARKING SPACES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
O. PUBLIC flEARIN63
Thm followimq items have no legal publication or posting
requireuute. Ths Chair will opal the meeting to receive
public betimony.
1. CONS ION 0 JV T NT PARKING CI AT 0 154
SCHEDVLE
RESOLUTION NO. 91-313 155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING A PARKING ENFORCEMENT SAIL
SCHEDULE
R. CITY MANA06A'B STAPP REPORTS
The tollowiog items do not legally nquia any public
teelimosp, although the Chair uy open the uetiag for public
input.
P
(
Y~ CitY Council Agonda
^ October lfi, 1991 11
No Items Submitted.
T~ COUNCIL BUSIMBSS
The following itess have bean nqueated by the Citp Council
for discussion. They are oot public hearing itesa, although
the Chair uy open the seating for public input.
No Itame Submitted.
J IOENTIlIGTION OT ITEMS FOR_N~l2T NECfIN6
Thin is the rice for Citp Council to identity the itess tDq
wish to ditcuu rt tDS next sseting. Theta 1lass will not be
diacuoad at thi• soling, only identified for the oext
wetlag.
~ COIDIUNIGTIONB PROM THE PVBLIC
This is the rise end place Eor LDs general public to addru•
tba Citp Connell. state law prohibits the City Council fros
addressing any iuw not pravioualp included on the Agenda.
TDS Cily Council uy weaive testimony and se! the setter for
a aubsequeat seating. Cooent• srs to Da Lisitad to five
ainutes per iadlvidwl.
L. ADJOVRNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EIECUTIV6 9ESBION DISCUSS LITIGATION.
I, Debra J. Adams, city Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
hereby certify that a truo, accurate copy of the faregc ing
agenda was posted on October 11, 1991, seventy-two (72) houce
prior to the meeting per Government code 54953 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
September 18, 1991
CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Aecul ar Heetinc
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday,
September 18, 1991, i.n the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Tha meeting waa called to
order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
PYeaent weY9 Councilmembets: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane
Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Andrew Arezyneki, Deputy City
Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; LeAnn Smothers, RDA Analyst;
Jan Reynolds, Assistant ADA Analyst; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development
Superintendent; Bcad eullerr City Planner; Larry Hende[son, Principal Planner;
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Joe O•Neil, City Rnqineer; Joe Stofe, Associnte
Engineer; Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinator; Joe Schultz, Community Serv lceb
Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Jim Hari, Administrative Services
Director; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyei II; Susan MLekey, Management Analyst
I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
S. ANNOVNCEMENTS/PR6 SENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Proclamation Commemorating the 200th Annivereaty of the
8111 of Rights.
Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Joe Schultz, Community Services
Director.
. ~ . . . x
C. COlBAUNICATIONS PROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
• • R
City Council Minutee
September 18, 1991
Page 2
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D16 should be removed from the agenda until
such time ae it was ready to come back to the Council.
D1. Approval of Minutee: July 25, 1991
August 7, 1991
Eeptember 4, 1991
D2. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noa. 8/30/91, 9/4/91 and 9/11/91] and
Payroll ending 8/29/91 For the total amount of $3,701,792.40.
03. Approval to receive and file current Inveetment Schedule ae of August 31,
1991.
D4. Approval o£ the Banner Administrative Procedure and Bonne[ Applicaiione ae
recommended by the Patk and Recreation Camnieelon. RHMOVBD FOR DISCU88I0N BY
MAYOR BTOUT.
D5. Approval of Contract Agreement and Sports Field S Facilities Handbook ae
recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission.
D6. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer requlzed ae
provided under Government Code Section 34090.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCNO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DEBTAVCTION OF CITY
RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED
UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090
D7. Approval io receive Tract Mape 14379 and 14380 (Tenta[ive Tract 13527) for
filing by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, that Bald Tracts are
located on the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street and ere
submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-264
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING TRACT MAPS 14379 AND 14380
(TENTATIVE TRACT 13527) FOR FILING
D8. Approval of amended San Bernardino county schedule A for Law Enforcement
Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $6,686,110.00
D9. Approval to Award and Auihorizat ion for execution for the Landscape and
Irrigat Lon Maintenance Contract (CO 91-062) for Landscape Maintenance District
Noe. 7 and 8 to Mariposa Horticultural EnterprLee s, Incorporated of Irwindale,
CaliEoxnia for the Amount of $14,192.76, to be funded by Account No. 47-4130-6028
and 48-4130-6028 (Fiscal Year 1991/92).
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 3
D30. Approval of and authorization to execute an Annual Street Striping Contract
(CO 91-063) in accordance with price schedule submitted by Orange County Striping
Service, Incorporated, to De funded from Gas Tax, Account No. 09-4637-6028,
Contract Services (Fiscal Year 1991/92).
nil. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 91-064) granting Right of First
Refusal to the San Bernardino Spirit for lease of the stadium facility to be
constructed ae part of the Raneno Cucamonga Sports Complex.
032. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Services Agreements
with Wagner Pacific Incorporated (CO 91-065) and Associated Engineers (CO 91-066)
for Ninor Capital improvement Project Design Surveying and Conetrucelon Staking
at various locations Citywide, Fiscal Years 1991/92 and 1992/93, to be funded
from the approprLate CapLtal Improvement Project Accounts at the Specified Rates.
D 13. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Services Agreements
with Schae Efer Dixon (CO 91-067) and AMA Croup (CO 91-068) for Minor Capital
Improvement Project Soils and Asphalt Testing at various locations Citywide,
Piecal Years 1991/92 and 1992/93, to be funded from the appropriate Capital
Improvement Project Accounts at the Specifietl Rates.
014. Approval io execute a Subreclpient Agreement (CO 91-069) with the Etiwanda
Historical Society utilizing Community Development Block Grant Funds for
rehabilitation of the Chaffey-Garcia Houe4.
D16. Approval to execute ImprovemenC Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Heintenance Dietri et No. 4 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Coyote Canyon school, locatetl
south o£ Terra Vista Parkway, east of Spruce Avenue, euhmltted by Lewis Nome9 of
California.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-265
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR COYOTE CANYON SCHOOL
RESOLUTION NO. 91-266
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCy0
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OROERI NG THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR COYOTE CANYON
SCHOOL
YC- ~I
.~L n
- "(--Fen6aea~` ITEN AENOVED FEON AGENDA.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page a
D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for DR EB-11 located
on the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue end San Bernardino Road submitted by
Edward R. Combs.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-268
A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 1MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR BB-11
D18. Approval tc accept Improvement e, Release o£ Bonds and Notice of Completion
for Victoria Planned Coaaaunity•e Master Tract 13279, location bounded by Highland
Avenue on the north, Base Line Road on the south, Deer Creek Channel On the west,
and Rochester Avenue on the Best.
Release: Faithful Performance sonde totalling $5,864,427.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds totalling $ 586,443.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-279
A RESOLUTION OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PCBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
MASTER TRACT 13279 ANB AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION POA THE WORX
D19. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for Traci 13644, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista
Grave Street.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S 496,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 49,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CLTY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
13644 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORE
020. Approval to accept Impcovement e, Release of Sonde and Notice of Completion
£or Parcel Mep 11891, located on Milliken Avenue between Arrow Nighwey and ,lereey
Boulevard.
City Counml Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 5
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (St rest) $2,250,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 225,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-271
A AESOLVTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
PARCEL NAP 11893 AND AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORA
D21. Approval to Release Ceah Bonds for DA 88-OB, located on the north aide of
7th Street between Hellman and Archibald Avenues for Golden Weet Propert iee.
Aeleaee: Faithful Performance Caeh Bond 5 6,862.00
Labor and Material Caeh Bond $ 3,431.00
022. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13541, located en
Sierra Vista Stree[ south of Camino Sur.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,100.00
D23. Approval to Accept the Milliken Avenue Median Improvement, from 4th to 6th
St taste and City Entry Monument, Contract No. 90-003, ae Complete, Release the
Bonds end Authorize the City engineer !o fLle a "Notice of Complet ton".
RESOLUTION NO. 91-272
A RESOLUTION OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCMO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
MILLIREN AVENUE MEDIAN IMPROVBMENT, FROM 4TH TO 6TH STREETS
AND CITY ENTRY MONUMENT, CONTRACT NO. 90-003 AND AUTHORIZING
THfi FILING OF A NOTICE OF CCMPLETION FOR THE WORE
MOTION: Roved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the Coneeni Calendar
with the exception of Items D4 and D16. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
RRRRRR
DISCUSSION OP ITEM D4. Approval of the Banner Adminiat [alive Procedure sad
Banner Applieetiosa as recommended by the Park sad Recreation Couiasion.
Mayor Stout euggeated wording be added in the policy eo that a banner could be
read be vehicles driving by at 30 - 35 miles per hour.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve item D4. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
R R R R R R
6. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 6
• ~ • .
F. MVBRTISBD PUBLIC 9EARIN09
F1. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1990 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODB_AND
LOCAL MODS PICAT IONS THERETO - Reconmendation for second read Lng of Ordinance No.
311-A adopting the 1990 National Electrical Code and approval of Aeeolut Lan
Making Express Findings of Need for Local Modifications thereto. Staff report
presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing wee closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 311-A.
ORDINANCB NO. 311-A (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OP TAB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP AANCNO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.24 ELECTRICAL DOE,
OP THE AANCNO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODES AND ADOPTING SY
REFERENCE TN6 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1990 BDITION; WITH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONSr DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO
SAID CODE
MOTION: Moved by Suquet, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve
Ordinance No. 311-A. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
RHSOLUTION N0. 91-273
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING E%PA6SS FINDINGS OF NEED FOR
LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE ETATE RUILD ING STANDARDS CODE
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 91-273.
Motion carr;.ed unenimousl y, 5-O.
• . ~ ~ • ~
F2. SIDERATION TO V CATS TION OF 5TH STR E L ATED ST O W
VA ENUE Staff report presented by Jae Stof a, Associate Bngi near.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public Rearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
AE SOLUTION N0. 91-274
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO RE VACATED, A PORTION OF
25TH STREET LOCATED WHET OF HTIWANDA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 30
FEET WIDE AND 1,092 PHET LONC, APN NO. 225-082-01
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 7
MOTION: Hovel by Wright, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91-274.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
. • • . . .
Ztem F4 was heard at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order.
x ~
P3. CONS IDEAATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND POINT OF INTEREST 91 02 POR
THE LAFOURCADE STORE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA - Consideration of an application
to designate the LaFOUrcade Store ee an Historic Point of Interest and review the
level of appropriate mltigatlone for the demolition of the structure located at
13871 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 229-011-30. Staff recommends issuance of a
mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Larry Hentlerson,
Principal Planner.
Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
were:
Michael Scadifio, representing the Maei family, thanked staff for the
great report end felt it was very thorough. He stated that
philosophically they agreed with staff's recommendation. He stated they
are anxious to get the Cowgirl torn down, which would be within a few
weeks. He added they are interested in continuing the history of this
location. He stated they are requesting they be allowed to spend the
$10,000.00 on sculpture for a piazza which would 6e on the Me91 Family
Bite, instead of apendtng the money ae staff was requesting for the
Chaffey-Garcia House. He added that staff was requesting an engineer be
present when removing the tlecorat ive parapet on the front, and felt a
skillful mason could handle this along with a City Engineer. He stated
with regards to the $5,000.00 to oral history, he added the Maei Family
would like to see Jennie Maei interviewed, who ie 82 years old. Ne stated
they would like to keep all of the costa ae low ae possible so the}- can
put any extra money back into the site,
Jack Masi stated hie parents purchased this Bite in 1951 and continued to
give Further tnforma[ion about the history of the Bite. He also talked
about the piazza they wanted to construct. He stated they woultl like to
put money Into a pLazza instead of donating it to the Chaffey-carets
House.
Councilmember Alexander asked iE he would retain cwnerehip of the property.
Mr. Haei atatetl yea.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Buquet atatetl he felt the City should work with the Maei'e, but did
not want it to alt there and get loaded with 9reffit 1. He also agreed with the
trLggering mechanism as recommended by staff.
City Council Minutes
September 1H, 1991
Page 8
Councilmemaer Alexander stated he would like to see the City continue the team
effort with the Hasi's.
Mayor Stout felt the facade was salvageable, and that if it could 6e, then eo be
it. He felt if ii could not be salvaged, then some type of replica should be
built in its place. He felt the au9geetiona of the $30,000.00 end $5,000.00
should be kept ae ie. He felt the building should be removed.
Councilmember Williams agreed with the 510,000.00 to be used for the museum and
felt the museum was vital. she also agreed with the proceee for the oral
interviews. She felt the building should come down as soon ae possible.
Councilmember Wright stated she agreed with moat everything that has been
mentioned, Dut felt there should be a way to require that the City be involved
in some sort of use of the money on the site because she felt there shoo ld be a
well-done historical memorialization on this site, and wondered if there could
be something created in an agreement far this. She stated she understood from
them that they were probably going to put In more than the $10,000.00, end felt
it would 6e appropriate to agree to something if they would go back to the
original HPC recommendation of $25,000.00 output and do some kind of
memoriallzation on the site which would require City approval. She stated she
agreed with the oral history program and felt a compromise could b¢ made if Jack
Masi would give an interview along wleh JennLe Masl, and then the amount for the
oral history interviews could be reduced to $2,500.00.
Andrew Aic zynski, Deputy CLty Attorney, stated there is the opportunity Co change
the Reeolut ion as the proceee goes along.
Mayor Stout euggeated Item 3 be modified Lo eliminate the etzucturel engineer.
Larry Nentlereon, Principal Planner, euggeated Lf the engineer ie eliminated,
there be drawings of the facade made eo that it could be reconstructed if
eomethLng happens to it.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-275
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST
91-02 DESIGNATING THE LAPOURCADE STORE, LOCATED AT 11871
POOTHILL 80ULEVARD, AS A POINT OP INTEREST AND CERTIFICATION
OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DEMOLITION OF THE
STRUCTURE - APN: 229-011-30
MOTION= Moved by Alexander, seconded by Hright to approve Re¢olut ion No. 91-275
ae amended. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
Mayor Stout euggeated that the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning
Commission work together on the types of on-a lte items that were ment Loned.
R R} R R R
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 9
F4. CONS ERATIO OP ASS SS NT AND DEVE OPNENT IST ICT AMENDMENT 91 1 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A iequeet to amend the Development Districts Hap from "OP"
(Office Professional) to ^FBSP" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) for a parcel
coneieting of approximately 8.3 scree located at the northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-152-18 and 30. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Scott Murphy,
Associate Planner.
Mayor Stoui opened the meeting for public hearing. There Deing no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Ad~.ma, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Noe. 456, 457, 458 and
459.
ORDINANCE NO. 456 (Ei rat reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 91-03, AMENOINC THB DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM
"OP" (OFPICE PROPESSIONAL) TO "FBSP" (POOTH ILL BOULBVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN) FOA A PARCEL CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 8.3
ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ewa'H 1LL BOVLEVARD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP -
APN: 227-152-18 AND 3D
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full read in9 and set
second reading of Ordinance No. 456 for October 2, 1991. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan to include a parcel coneieting of approximately 8.3 acres
at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard end Rochester Avenue within Subarea
4 and establish standards for development - APN: 227-152-1B an 30. SC¢ff
recommends ie nuance of a Negative Declaration
RESOLUTION NO. 91-276
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-01, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE A PARCEL CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY
8.3 ACRES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE WITHIN SUBAREA 4 AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOA
DEVELOPMENT, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
227-152-18 AND 30
MOTION: Moved by Ruquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91-276.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 10
CONSIDERATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL A SESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish centaln
etreetecapa and Bite design standards coneietent with the Poothill Boulevard
Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista
Planned community. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
ORDINANCE NO. 457 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COlDfUNI TY PLAN
AMENOMENT 93-01 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STABSTSCAPE AND SITE
DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE POOTNILL BOULEVARD
SPECIPIC PLAN POR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN
THE TERRA VIBTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND HARING PINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set
eecontl reading of Ordinance No. 457 for October 2, 1991. Motion Carried
unanimously, 5-0.
NOME 1 O O G - A request t0 establish certain
etreetacape and site design etanderde coneietent with the Poothill Boulevard
Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Planned
Community. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
ORDINANCE NO. 458 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STREETSCAP6 AND SITE
DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIPIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD NITNIN
THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND MAKING FINDINGS TN SUPPORT
THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded Dy Alexander to waive full reading end set
second reading o£ Ordinance No. 458 Eor October 2, 1991. Mol ion carded
unanimouslyr 5-O.
CONSIDERATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL-SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-04 CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A reque et to establish certain
etreetecape end Bite design atandartle coneietent with the Poothill Boulevard
Specific Plan for that portion of eoothlll Bou levnrd within the Industrial Area
Specific Plan. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declereiion.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 11
OAOI NANCE NO. 4H9 (firer reading)
AN OAD INANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CTTY OP RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AHENDtffiNT 93-04, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STREETSCAPS AND SITE
DSSIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL ROUI.I:VARD
SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN
TFiE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, aecontled by Alexander to waive full reading and net
second reading of Ordinance No. 659 for October ~, 3991. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-O,
No It ema Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
R R R R R R
6. PUBLIC HEARIMGB
I R R R R R
B. CITY MANAOER'8 eTAPP REPORTB
R R R R R R
2. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COHMISSYON (ORAL REPORT)
Mayor Stout asked if all Councllmembere had had the opportunity to review the
report thaC he and Councilmember Wright had prepared in August regarding this
matter.
The Council confirmed they had read it.
Mayor Stout stated the Yecommendation of the Subcommittee Se to modify the
Commission, with the re-evaluation of the make-up of the Commission membership,
and limiting the Conmlieeion to five members, and that all members of the present
Commission would be invited to reapply and would be interviewed with the other
applicants from the public.
MOTION: Moved by Buguet, seconded by Alexander to approve the recommendation of
the Suhconunittee ae stated above by Mayor Stout. Mot Lon carried unanimously, B-
0.
R R R R R R
I2. SCU SI T 0 CT AR ROJ T Staff report presented by
Risk Gomez, Community Dev¢lopment Director.
City Council Minutes
September 1H, 1991
Page 32
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council
woe:
Roeey McCObb stated her biggest concern and also that of the reeidente
that live in the Victoria Groves community was the increase in their
assessment. She felt the reeidente near to the Lakes project would
benefit by that project, but did not necessarily feel it would benefit her
area because they were not close enough to it. She asked that the
Victoria reeidente be kept informed of what is going on with the Lakes
project.
Mayor Stout stated when Victoria was originally planned there was a goal to set
up a certain number of park acreage per thousand reeidente. He adtled in order
to fulfill that requirement, the William Lyon Company hoe to construct, in this
location, 25 acres of either combination lakes/parka or just park land. Ne
stated they have waited until the last ^village" to build the largest park for
a total of 25 acres. It stated in the original concept all of the park land
would have been spread equally if it had been just normal park land of 25 scree
eo that the aeaeeemente in the Groves area woo ltl have been equal to Lhat in the
Lakes area. He stated by having this a park/lake type of concept you can
distinguish Lt from a normal perk and say it hoe a lot of benefit the closer you
are to the lake. He stated obviously the people closer to the lake will have
more benefit. He felt this was an improvement to the assessment situation.
Councilmember Wright asked Me. McCObb if when she purchased her home in Victoria,
was she aware she would be assessed additionally for future parka.
Ha. McCOhb stated it was presented to the homeowners that they would pay
aeaeeemente because they did have added land in the paseoe and the parka
and that they had the proximity of the Victoria Crovee Park to their home.
She stated when she bought she did not feel it was clearly presented !o
them that the parka were City/public parka, and stated it was presented to
them that they were the reeidente' parka in their area. She stated thin
was a miaunderetanding ae to what this truly meant. She stated they were
told there were aeaeeemente, that there were no association fees, but it
was not explained how they would increase ae additional parka were built.
CouncilmemDer Wright asked if when they were given the whole picture ae io what
their taxes would be for the year, was it indicated that those aeaeeemente would
increase ae amenit tee developed.
Me. HcCObb statetl it was presented that they did have assessment a, and
that nothing was explained that the aeaeeemente would increasn.
There being no further response, Mayor Stout cloeetl the public comment a.
Councilmember Wright stated she placed this on the agenda because the City
Council hoe not heard about this project since Deborah Brown left the Council,
and felt the current Council shoo ld be kept informed. she elated eha wonted the
public to have the opportunity to express themselves about this before the
project ie at the ^point of no return.^ She added Me. McCObD'e comments about
the aeaeeament increases were of concern to her.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page 13
Mayor Stour suggested the Lakes Subcommittee be re-established because it had not
been in existence since Deborah Broun had left the Council.
Councilmember euquet suggested Councilmember Nilliame jaln him in the
Subcommittee.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to receive and file the report and
for the Subcommittee of Baguet end Williams to continue working on this project
and keep iha entire Council updated. Motion carried unanimously, $-0.
• ~ . : x .
Item F3 was heard at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order.
R • • • • Ii
I3
prevented by Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager.
Staff report
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council
wd0:
Anita Nidd, owner of property within the proposed CFO, stated that her
taxes would Lncreese by 57,000.00 to $8,000.00, to approxtmately
$275,000.00.
Mayor Stout advised thei there would be a public hearing on Lhie matter at the
November 6, 1991 meeting.
There being no further response, Mayor Stout closed the public comments.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-277
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONOA, CALIPORN IA, TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT N0. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 9i-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF
THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAHONGA
RESOLUTION ND. 91-278
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS IN AN
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCBED $55,000,000.00 WITHIN
PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA
COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Aeeolut ion Noe. 93-
277 and 91-278. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1991
Page la
• • • • •
I4. RBPORT ON TH8 CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN FOR A C ON P V TO
ADDRR$S THR NRF Op NO 7WID P VI StefE report presented
by IsAnn Saathere, RDA Melynt, who also presented a video.
Councilmember Alexander eteted ha would like to see this pursued.
Councilmember Buquet felt a regional approach should be taken in order to do
something to Delp this problem. Ne offered hie time Co help pursue Chie.
CouncilniemDez will tame felt Rancho Cucamonga has an obligation to its ree ideate
to help thine.
Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, stated staff would present the program to the
City Council as Lt ie developed.
• f f • • R
J. IDBNTI FICTION OF ITRM9 FOR N6ZT 101' INo
Jl. Councilmen~ber Nright stated she would like a report on the Cheffey-Garcia
House barn area with an opportunity to take some sort of a formal action to
support what the Council's Sntent ie for this project.
R • R
R COMIRINIGTIOR9 PROM TNB PL Z
No communication was made from the public.
R • R • • !
I.. ADJOURNMENT
NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded Dy Williams to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously, B-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:56 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
APProved:
October 2, 1991
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COONCIL MINVTBS
Aewlar Meetinc
A. CULL TO ORDER
A regular meeting o£ the Rancho Ncamonga City Council was held on Wednesday,
October 2, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornla. The meeting was called to
order at 7:02 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmember e: William J. Alexander, Diane Williams, Pamela J.
Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Hanager; James Hackman, City Attorney; Linda
D. Danlela, Deputy Cify Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Meneger; Rick
Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, Clty Planner? Larry
Hentlereon, Principal Planner; Richard Alcorn, Code finforcement Supervisor; Joe
O•Neil, City Engineer; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer; Vicki Dey, Engineering
Technician; Duane Baker, Aeeist ant to the City Manager; Chief Donnie Michael,
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Diaitict; Capt. Bruce 2einer, Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department; and Debra J. Adema, City Clerk.
Absent was Counci lmember: Charles J. euquet
R • • • • •
B. ANNOIINCEMBNTS/PA69ENTATIONB
83. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Consent Calendar Item D4 would be removed
at this time and would come back to the City Council et a future meeting.
B2. Jack Lam, City Manager, requested an Executive Beee icn to die ca se personnel
matters and contract services.
• R 1 } • R
C. COMMUNICATIONS fRON TBE PUBLIC
C1, Ph 11 Deatherage, 6564 Et iwanda, asked that the Clty Council join the
American Legion at the crape Harvest Festival in dietriDuting drug free
posters.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 2
D CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noe. 9/18/91 and Payroll ending 9/12/91 for
the total amount of $676,316.08.
D2. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 91-072) wish Undexwritez fot services
aeeociated with ieeuance of Banda for Community Pacilit ice District No. 91-1.
D3. Approval to summarily vacate a portion of the eoutheaet corner of Milliken
Avenue end Terra Vista Parkway, northwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Church
Street and northwest corner of Elm Avenue and Church Street requested by Lewis
Homes of California (APN: 227-I51-22, 1077-421-58, 1077-421-62).
RESOLUTION NO. 91-280
A AHSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, SVMMARILY ORDERING TH8 VACATION OP A
PORTION OP TNB SOUTHEAST CORNER OP MILLIREN AVENUE AND THRRA
VISTA PARKWAY, NORTHWEST CORNER OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND CHURCH
STREET, NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELM AVENUE AND CHURCN STREET, AND
SOUTHEAST CORNBA OP SPRVCE AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET - APN:
227-151-22, 1077-421-58, 1077-421-55 AND 1077-421-62
__ _ __ __ __ _ __ _ ITEM REMOVED 17tON AGENDA.
O5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extene ion for Tract 10246 located
on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hllletde Road, submitted by JCR
Development.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-283
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVSHENT AGREEMENT
E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECUNITY POR TRACT 10246
D6. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Ronde and Notice of Completion
for Tract 12820, and Approval io accept Landscape Improvement e, and reduction of
Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 33727. Both Tracts are located on the south
aide of Highland Avenue between Carnelian Street and Jasper Street.
Tract 12820
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $412,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 41,200.00
Tract 13727
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $146,000.00
Accept: Reduced Pa ithful Performance Bond $ 19,600.00
RESOLVTION NO. 91-284
A A850LUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF IUINCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 12820 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OP
COMPLETION FOR THE NORR
D7. Approval to Release the Improvement Security for Landscaping nlong 24th
Street across the San Sevalne Waeh for Traci Noe. 13566-I and -3 accepted by city
Council on October 4, 1989, requested by The caryn Development Company.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $179,000.00
Labor and Materials Bond $ 87,500.00
AESOLVTION N0. 91-285
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIAr RELEASING THE IMPROVSHENT SECURITY POA
THE LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH BTREET ACROSS THE EAN SEVAINE WASH
FOR TRACT NOS. 13566-1 AND -3 PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY
COUNCIL
D8. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for DR BB-2R located on the southeast coiner Of Spruce Avenue and White Oak
AVenee.
Aeleaee: Faithful Per Eormance Bond (Street) $ 20,000.00
City Council Ninutee
October 2, 1991
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 91-286
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPROVBMENTS FOR
DA 88-28 AND AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
POA THE WORK
D9. Approval to release the Improvement Agreement and Security for Improvements
to Church Street from Spruce Avenue to elm Avenue accepted by City Council on
September 19, 1990, eubmltted by Levels Homes of California.
Release: Peithful Performance Bond $508,000.00
Labor and Materials Bond $256,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-287
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA, RELEASING TN8 IHPROVBMENT AGREEMENT AND
SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO CHOACN STREET
PROM SPRUCE AVBNVE TO ELM AVENUE
D10. Approval to release Maintenance Bond for Tract 11606 located on the south
aide of 19th Street between Haven Avenue and Inyo Place.
Releaeee Maintenance Guarantee Sand (Street) $ 55,400.00
Nalntenanca Guarantee Bond (Storm $ 5,600,00
Drain)
D11. Release of Maintenance Rond for Tract 13559 located on Sierrn Crest View
Loop at Mt. Wilson Court and White Mountain Court.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 19,600.00
012. Release of Maintenance Bond for Parcel Map 9192 Landscape, located on the
northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $144,361.00
D13. Approval to Release Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond,
and to accept the Maintenance Bond for the Cucamonga Elementary School Fiald
Improvement Ptoj act, Sunr tae Land ecape Company, Incorporated, Contract No, 90-
095.
MOTION: Moved by Alexenderr seconded by Willieme to approve the Consent Cfllendar
with the exception of Item D6. yotion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Buquat
absent),
• • w
City Council Mlnutee
October 2, 1991
Page 5
B. CONSENT ORDTNANCBe
E1. CO T P TRI
OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A request to amend the Developoent Districts Hap from "OP"
(Office Professional) to ^FBSP" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) fora parcel
coneistinq of approximately 8.3 scree located at the northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-152-3E and 30. Staff raconvnende
issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, reatl the title of ordinance No. 466.
ORDINANCE NO. 456 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCH OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DHVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 91-01, AMENDING THE DfiVfiLOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM
"OP" (OFFICB PROFESSIONAL) TO "FBSP" (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN) FOR A PARCEL CONSISTING OF APPAO%IMATELY 8.3
ACRES LOCATED AT THfi NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THBREOP -
APN: 227-152-18 AND 30
MOTION: Roved by Wright, eeconded by Williams to waive full reading end approve
ordinance No. 456. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (BUquet absent).
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to set aDlish cerinin
etrestecape antl site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terre Vista
Planned Community. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 457.
ORDINANCE NO. 957 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STAEETSCAPE AND SITE
OES IGN STANDARDS CONSISTfiNT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN POR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN
THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND RAKING FINDINGS IN
SVPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Wright, eeconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve
Ordinance No. 657. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (BUquet absent).
CONSIDERATION F ENV IRO ENTA SESSHENT VIC I OMMUN Y
AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A Yeque et to eeteblieh certain
etreetecape and Bite design etanderde consistent with the Foothill Boulevard
Spec Lfic Plen for theta portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Planned
community. Staff recommends issuance of n Negative Declaration.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 6
Debra J. Aflame, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No, 458.
ORDINANCE NO. 458 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-03, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STREETSCAPE AND SITE
DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIPIC PLAN POA THAT PORTION OP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN
THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOP
MOTION: Moved by Wri9hG, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve
ordinance No. 658. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Baguet absent).
CONS DERATION OF ENVI ONMENTAL S SS ENT D INDUSTRI SP C IC P AN
E MEN 91 04 OF O CVC NG - A request to set aDlieh certain
etreetacape and Bite design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Industrial Area
Specific Plan. Staff reconmenda issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Debra J. Aflame, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 459.
ORDINANCE NO. 459 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INO USTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-04, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STAEETSCAPE AND SITE
DESIGN STANDARDS CONSIBTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIPIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL ROVLSVARD WITNTN
THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MARI NC FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
MOTIONS Moved by Wright, aecontled by Williams to waive full reading and approve
Ordinance No. 459. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (august absent ).
• R / R f
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC BEARINGS
P1. CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOA THE PROFOSED VACATION OF AN ALLEY
LOCATED SOUTH OP NINTX STREET FROM VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES (COntisusd
from Septesber 4, 1991) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the
City Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was cloeetl.
Mayor Stout stated he still felt public access in this alley-way was one of the
major problems. He felt 1t was unnecessary for the City Co have to maintain this
ae a public alley-way. Ne hoped that a solution woultl be worked out that would
deny public access through that alley-way. Ha felt if the residents that Live
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 7
adjacent to this need backyard acceee, this would need to be provided in some
way. He suggested if the residents wished, they could gate this area to be a
private alley-way so they could use it for backyard acceee.
Councilmember Alexander stated he would be in favor of allowing the right-of-way
to go back to the ownership of those properties to make it part of their
backyard. xe also mentioned Councilmember Buquet had brought up the Seeue at a
previcue meeting about the area being gated off and how this may affect police
entrance if needed.
Councilmember Wright stated she did not think fencing It off on either end was
the answer. She felt the City should cons inue pursuing a solution to try to have
the entire area go back to private property.
ACTION: Council concurred for staff to keep working on this matter with the
residents to come up wish a solution to the alley-way problem.
R R R R • •
F2. CONSIDERATION TO VACATE A SIDEWA<E BASEMENT LOCAT D B TWEEN 9415 AND 942
PALO ALTO STREET. AT THE TERMINVS OF LAYTON ETRSET Staff report presented by
Vicki Day, Engineering Technician.
Mayor Stout asked if legally the way this was eetaDliahedr would the vacation
become legally complete at the time the improvements are complete.
Vicki Day, Engineering Technician, stated no, that the vacation would happen
immediately antl would be divided between the iwo parcels. She etatetl the
residents to the east have no interest in the four Eeet they would get, eo they
would quick claim it to the Sokol off •s who would make the improvements
immediately.
Mayor Stout asked what the enforceabil Lty was once this ie vacated.
James Markman, city Attorney, stated once the vacation was recorded, the city
would not own the easement and ii ie the residents' property.
Mayoz Stcut asked if the City could give them the right io make the improvements
and then at the completion of the improvements make the vacation effective at
that time.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated yea, if that was the Council's desire.
Mayor Stout stated he would like to see the walkway out of that area completely.
James Markman, City Attorney, euggestetl the Council approve the Reeolutionr but
for et aff not to record the vacation document until the improvements have been
made.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for pub llc hearing. Addressing the City Council
were:
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page S
Steve Sokoloff, 9415 Palo Alto, pointed out to the Council they had been
given n copy of a petition supporting the closure of the walkway and that
they agreed with the recommendation made by Mayor Stout.
Crag Anderson, 7484 Layton, stated he was concerned about the fencing of
the Junioz High School. HB eiated there was a gateway at the Dack of the
Junior High that needs to De closed off, otherwise he fell the students
would have access back there.
Vicki Day, Engineering Technician, eiated it was her understanding that the
property owners had been In contact with the Principal of the Junior High School
and that the school felt It was their fencing and woultl be willing to take it
down right away. She stated the new gated area would ba from the Corner of the
existing block wall to the point at the northeaei corner. She eCeied she did not
think the Children would be able to access that area at all because of the now
block wall and the dead specs blocked off.
Theta Deinq no further response, the public hearing was closed.
James Markman, City Attorney, eug9eaied Section 3 of the Resolution should be
changed to read "The concrete sidewalk within the easement area shall De removed
and the walkway closed off prior to recordation of the vacation."
RESOLUTION NO. 91-288
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO 8E VACATED A SIDEWAL%
EASEMENT LOCATED EETWEEN 9415 AND 9425 PALO ALTO STA88T, AT
THE TERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET
MOTION: Moved Dy Stout, seconded Dy Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91-288
ae amended by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimcusly, 4-0-I (Baguet
absent).
w • w • • ~
F3. CON DE ON TO VACAT RECORD D OFP OP D TIO R A A IO
MIGNONETTE STREET AND RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FOA 4260 MIGNONETTE STREET Staff report presented by Joe Stofe,
Associate Engineer.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
woe:
Steve Butters eiated he concurred with staff's recortmendatlon.
Thera being no further response, Che public hearing was closed.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 91-289
A RESOLUTION OB THE CITY COVNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO 86 VACATED A RECOIID&D OPPER
OF DEDICATION FOR A PORTION OF MIGNONETTE STREET FAOH RELLMAN
AVENVE WESTERLY INCLUDING THE PARTIAL CVL-DE-SAC - APN 202-
041-57 AND E8
MOTION: Moved by Wright, eecontled by Alexander to approve Reeolut ion Nc. 91-289.
Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (BUquet absent).
• R R • R R
Items F4, PS, G2 and G3 were considered et the same time.
P4. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE ANNE%ATIDN OF TERRITORY TO TNB
LAW ENFORCEMENT CPD eE-2 AND AUTHOR IEING SUBMITTA4 OP LEVY OP SPECIA_ TA%ES TO
TH6 OUALIFIED ELECTOR$ Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Aseiatant to the
City Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the CLiy Council
wee:
Craig Page, Ahmanson Company and also representing Watt Inland Empire,
erased both companies supported the elect ion for the comnuniiy Facilities
DieCrtct. He stated they also supported the setting of the public hearing
for the flood control maintenance.
There being no further response, the public hearinq was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-290
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMITTAL OP LEVY OF SPECIAL TA%ES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Reeolut ion No. 91-
290. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Wright no, Buquet ebeent).
• R R R
F8.
PROCEDURES FOR THE ELECTION Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Resistant to
the city Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeCing for public hearing. Atldre9eing the City Council
wee:
city Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 30
Craig Page, Ahmanson Company and also representing watt Inland Empire,
eteted both companies supported the election Eor the Community Facilities
District, He stated they also supported the setting of the public hearing
for the flood control maintenance.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
AEEOLUTI ON NO. 91-291
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS IN
AN ANNEXED AREA OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT A
PROPOSITION TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES
AND CONDITIONS FOR CONDUCTING AN ELECTION
NOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91-
291. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Wright no, Baguet absent).
~ ~ e • ~
6. PUBLIC REARINOS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT (CO 91-0731 WITH THE COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO
FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY'S VEHICLE_ ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND ADOPTION OP
COUNTX ORD INANCB NO. 3349 RY REFERENCE Staff report presented by Alchard Alcorn,
Code Enforcement Bupervisor.
Mayor Stout stated according to what he read in the newspaper, the Board of
Supervisors has not adopted this program yet antl asked for clarification.
Richard Alcorn, Cade Enforcement Supervisor, stated they have not adopted the
service authority. Xe added the item before the Council ie a contract antl
related Ordinance for participation in a County Vehicle Abatement program. He
eteted the service authority which was outlined with this at the previous Council
meeting was a separate issue. He stated it was a coat recovery program that
relates to vehicle abatement, but was not reletetl to this contractual agreement.
Mayor Stout eteted hie only concern was iF the Council adopts this contract and
the Boertl of Supervisors changes the other program in some way, would this have
to Dome back to the Council to amend this.
Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Bupervieoz, stated the only affect on the future
adoption of the vehicle abatement authority would be additional funding to pay
for this program.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting far public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
councllmember Wright asked would this in any way create within the County a
franchise e6ility £or certain people to perform this service, and Ln effect
create a monopoly on who can perform the service of towing.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 11
James Markman, City Attorney, stated yes, except for the fact there has been a
lot of litigation on the requirement that you rotate toeing services, not only
far this purpose but for police enforcement services. He stated that the rule
of thumb ie that for all potential providers with the facilities to provide this
service in the areas and within the response times indicated are all to be on a
rotation list.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wzight to approve CO 91-073 with the
County of San Bernardino. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (BUquet absent).
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the Preliminary Reading of the title of
Ordinance No. dfi0.
ORDINANCE NO. 460 (pre liminnry reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, ORDINANCE NO.
3349 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAADINO PERTAINING TO THE
ESTABLISHMENT OP RULES, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES FOR
PARTICIPATING IN TH6 VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OP
THE COUNTY OP SAN BEANARDINO, INCLVDSNG THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
CERTAIN FEES AND PENALTIES
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to set the public hearing for
November 6, 1991 along with the first reading of the Ordinance ei that time.
Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-3 (BUquet absent).
R R R R R f
G2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING MAP SHOWING AREA OF BENEFIT A D
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF_A REPORT IN APGAADS TO A BENEFIT ASSE SMENT DISTRICT
FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AS CONDITIONED ON TENTATIVE TMCT 14139 fAH SOM AND
ON TENTATIVE TRACT 13527 !WATT INLAND EMPIRE) Staff report presented by Duane
Baker, Aeeietant to the City Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addraeeing the Clty Council
was:
Craig Page, Ahmanson Company and also representing Watt Inland Empire,
stated both companies supported the election for the Community Facilit lee
District. He et ated they also supported the setting of the public hearing
for the flood control maintenance.
There being no further response, the public hearing waa closed.
RESOLUTION N0. 91-292
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING AREA OP BENEFIT
AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT
City Council Ninutea
OcCOber 2, 3991
Page 12
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Reeolut ion No. 91-
292. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Wright no, Buquet aDeent).
. e • • + .
G3.
report presentetl 6y Duane Baker, Resistant to Lhe city Manager.
Staff
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
wae:
Craig Page, Ahmanson Company and also repteeantinq Watt Inland Empire,
stated botA companise supported the election foz the Comaunity Facilities
Di strict. He etnted they also supported the setting of the public hearing
for the flood control maintenance.
There being no further response, the public hearing wae closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-293
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DBCLARING INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL
BBNEFIT ASSBSSMENTS, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING, AND APPROVING REPORT OF ENGINEER
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91-
293. Motion carried 3-1-3 (Wright no, Buquet absent).
R } R • • }
H. CITY MANAOER'8 9TAFP REPORTS
H1. CONS OERATION F FAIT FUL PERFO NC a ND RE CTIO FO RAC 2
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SVMMIT AVENUE BETWEEN ETI WANOA AVENUE AND EAET
AVENVE SUBMITTED BY FIRST FAMILY HOMES
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $326,000.00
Accept: Faithful Performance Bond $112,000.00
Michelle Deiiart, repreeenting First Family Homes, pointed out to the
Council thae the Laet two sentences of Che staff report stated, "While the
developer is requesting the bond amount be reduced to $67,000.00, staff
recommande that the amount be no leas than $112x000.00, due to the fact
that the street paving does not meet CLty etandarde.^ Ghe stated elnoe
ehie staff report wfle written, they Dava gotten the street paving accepted
by the City and presented a letter she had received et at ing ao. She
stated they would like the et rest paving eliminated from the bond amount
also.
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1991
Page 33
Jae O•Neil, City Hngineer, stated this wee new information to him and was not
aware of the change in request.
Mayor Stout asked Me. DeHart to submit the letter from the City Lo Mr. O'Nell.
Jack Lam, City Manager, pointetl out that the Council could approve this subject
to the city Engineer verifying Chis informal ion on Thursday, October 3rd.
Mayor Stout stated he would not approve ibis request anywayr until the
improvements are completed at the corner of Beryl and Nillaide.
Me. DeHatt ete[ed this tract was not related to Nordic, and that the City
staff would verify they have not had any problems with this tract.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to deny the request. Motion carried
unanimously, 6-0-1 (BUquet absent).
Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to get some kind of ReeoluL ion ee
to the ataiemente made.
I COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. REPORT ON THE CHAFFRY-GARCIA HOVSfi Siaff tepori presented by Larry
Henderson, Principal Planner.
Councilmember Alexander asked when some of the additions to the project are
built, ate the contributors given any credit by means of a plaque or ermiething
along that line.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yee, and that he has a video, that he
would not show tonight, which does demonstrate this. He stated they are
interested in recognizing the donors.
Councilniember Wright stated she had hoped Eor was that the Council could develop
aome epecif is policy for mitigating historical eiteB.
Mayor Stout suggested that Councllmember Wright work with the Historic
Preservation Commission and staff to deve Lop thle policy and bring Lt back to the
entire Council for approval.
Cou ncilmember Wright asked Mr. Henderson to eat this up, that she would be happy
to work on this,
ACTION: Councilmember Wright to work with the Historic PYe6ervat ion Commies ion
and eiaff to develop Che policy for mil Lgating histozical sites.
• • x • a
City Council Minutee
October 2, 1991
Page 14
J IDENTIlICATION O! ITEM9 POR N62T lD:ETINO
No items were identified for the next meeting.
• • • • ~ x
A:. CONNVNICATION9 IRON TR6 PVR.IC
No communication was made from the public.
• : e . x
L. ADJOURNIO:NT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Wright to race ee to Executive Seeeion Co
discuss personnel matters and contract services. Motion carried unanimously, 4-
0-1 (BUquet absent). The meeting recessed at 7:56 p.m., not to reconvene.
Respectfully eu~itietl,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
P
W
O
Y
w e oeooe •eNwNOOawhwNeNNN<•eeeesNewoeo+eeeeoenho
oooYe elhwfooNanewenweNloNYONSNweoePe oneee nae
N ONONO wOawONyMw^+NOOwNhPOn+NM~NwNeNNONNNO•N10
P anONO + N OIOIInONe+w PMaNO10PON+NNnpa
N
JnNmN•aN•rrwnawVnOPO-1Nw•MIhOwOwNwIMe1-O wO rN nln•I.OwOwN
nry:00fOY = O O 'wwrwr+nl NnNnn
eP «fi'SL~Z' LSwRwR R wwwwPwwnwwiwwnwwwPwwww
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
>vn~wnNNwNNPwNNNNNNNnNNnNnnNNnNnwNNnNwnNNnNNNNNnnNNNN
<10101 • IY Y OY + Y
u i ~ h • n a .:~
< ~
iNP
7•N
u~a
~e
z
iY0
W yw
OJw
V
ni `n
N N N jj N • N•V YOWnr NNW hYWNO
my ~ NN N 1 IN\Jr. +ii N •iM• N
2 • N iN \O M wYLO•JYW• iYL
v : yp y rr = VPWi •N<NOO>NI YN•
V Y.VVn NP •w Oh =wPNY w2w0 W •fONN
V V V J OfV: C O i„ iWMJ w000lPW+Nnf .\ONY: O
•r ir.0 h N• h Yh\Wi VS yYJy9•VfUYNWNrf eVh OY
y J~C• ! 1L NY _O iN<YII/J(~~\ OyiONOwiYiPY 1YF2YV
N i Wyi•IN O •w ~• OlW~+W IY(n.TiiWAy N1LWVMitM~N iw
W jN1~V ~ Ww •wH I/FjrWVN~~iiw+rWn~wN•YN .rO w_n r.
_ _\ F • LLO lYYNJ.IJNhOwYOWiYfOW ON9Wi • O•
w P • O\ i FIIY••N J J JJIL^ O
2 OOw Oi WL Y:N Wi YJwNiMNV•NUNOM iYVNNNYN
LLS• M YO Of •f OfWOIHVNNV NNN NPOYNNNS
< N ~I SO MWWV V =MJ Jh YWMi t9•t0~.•YOLVWpr01••yUi
O i C YV h f W NW Z OYJ<JJNwJ7JNnO..hN9JJriJ
YW Y„ Y O wwYY >WJfNWWyrUJVU VNV MIIFN< NVVN..V
V>n ~[WO•YNWJw•
V J V NSNYi i NM=:VaXO..W iU• O_O_O_O_W O_O_i 0_fO NhWYO_O_Ff 0_
V O • CiN iNhWY •• 2 • Y Y NSW WW
O _ O iNOIY M.ia>SOff> SJY00 OOJ7 O~JWOY. »WO'J
O •yYOM OWO=Y•~W 1w HrNJ^IYfYMVWVIYWWW>MiYO YW>••MYw
> > 1 • OVw YYY O lf••UOVhNZOOrrYf •frrii~f~ LrYWNLY
~.
ioi
iii
.>i
Z
N Z
_ Y_ Z N
V
O O • r <Z V..
i Z ~J iW ZW N
u O NY\N if .~< i >
W Vi>Y i01
S• N
< e r NN y W • u>\r i. if w
Y hYi f • W NIFJ Jy a b. V J
V J V VN~i Z .Oi MAO<N•J~ iff> V J.Vi YN +N
h_ _ 06>W i>+ ..Oy•i0 Ntlr>N O J[h<6 .f2N
eZ NOV OV
eia C•O OY hU +W~O• fir S
G G O OOIW •IL [[Yn9N2JwrUOr.<.• l w00<• r< Ow
>•u ~J hw J~•ehW rui: °osW [ <rr .-IYhi
Ma vJrWO •W<yN'Wy2 siliio of
> > N NNOa- Wu+e ri•r lest.: w h°We~ir .f so J.JJ
O O O Y[JJW <J <OF1iiwM• JWJWeWWVN-LROWrM~WW .tlyrY<W
J V 6 ••~Vf YW~LJrO[rSHFJfYNSUi~~YUO<wrl..JJJltlf Miff
.Zi .Zi J VV[jY •~•<~e•met••OOOOOfOe0O000eeVUUVVVVVVVUJ
P wn `~O "nhriiii o.~i.+.on~naniliipewwiwei el°n rwlNilna nm
tin orywN N+NNn~nryrnN nn+nNwnnwN
n N r N ea / +N i+ra+aanaae• nn anens< no
1
~6
Pe~ae~ao~ave.
OiONrNNO•OT•Y•10
w w ~~••~•rnwwM
ONONOOOPNNMOaNOhO00000yNPONOONNONON
N IOa000!•iONOiONOONaONNwTNNr0P0N000
TO•O PPNPNNTr~/M•IMNNNnPN~•~.Orr000NM•
f • N N rl
V V
0
:MP
w
u~N
WP
ZOO
iLL0
X00
OJ6
4
V
O
F
V
Ii
i
•O
ti
~TaMOI.OPO~NT•NOhWPOwNT•NOM1OPONNT•N OI.OI O•~NT•N<I.OPO rNn
:PP:^.~~~XiiSRRRiRRa&SR;.a~R:.XRRRRRRRRR.:R:aaa:aCPPXR
OPnwnNNnNNNnPPPNnnNNNNNnNMMNnnMnwPNnPwnNPMNnNPPNPwNN
O 000 1} O f
00
i O P°
y WN • N \O
i\ \
fP P Y •\f PN PP N•
1•iOn nW N W d OrW \N !Oh\
__ V I NNh
iu i1s
.•ir PV N N i P M i0 PPNWI
:~.° ~• ev eJO PeJ r r r Pew
P NF TV O< N: • O fJ N • n 0W\P° P
9 w W w •Pli:
PYZP !V P PWNP• P Z• f~iY P ~• •W Z VR•N
•YJ 1V W P WP W WVV •1 \1 ZI
i Ow Y P•wW X~ •P fy •J NIV OP
wi>Wi VW {~O M f<Nw TV
YYI~NX •iw y W W •W !•• W •T OJTONNnVW
nin ~{wJ _V_V Ui •VONNN O O Y WNWPJyMOWwNG
P•W • t_ W W! O WW> •N• • O SN
00X~wN•W• `P• PNP9 wP if R P•00~Vf{
i W „ W ZOV JaJO •J 'J OP Z VOeO
NZN~~YV wWWN N On7 3i J„iNN SpNO
NNO: y y ZWWN iN:w:OwOY i0O • WNN WN •{ivniViJN~6
JJNJNJ•NOZOwiij wJWPJ<Z°a JNw°O40WJJ {wJi\<J~~2J<C
UyNyN10 wf2iVVY OwVP{VP~P V _FMOiNVV iWY wWV OV
OOiO°OM~fuiiMP Y_•i_i _O ON _pJVO~J•_U W O_f ~JO°_9 _V O_ JNOy1WtP0\{N_O_WY
iiNZpN iV=NN 1 O { f 0.00 N {iWWNinW SW
'J9iJSN• w OwwJ e7?ef OPFPWO7lPPY0NtwOWw2~0oW9 sW'Jfs
•4•LLVwOWOw3Vff• 0421•W iJf•wJiJ•Nw}•\4 S••O:4V0
6ifRtNO•YRV~FFr mi•NO4~O VOIZ ii'iJRVViiOYWIXIJwtRNNYONWi<N
J O ti
e y<
O w j j W w Y G
NiY W ~
'pJ V O
F\YO O i i J R
i < wVOV 6V w V 1[
NfP Wi N W •i U }
w<0 O Y J
WO ~U FOV }\ i O {~W
~f ZO }i2w 6_7 \O M_V w0_O_
Vw>_O wJ • N y
~iN wi°W XR VR~i ~•V Neu JXVwYVOWWIVGPRi •>iti~p•f°
LOJVFf• 4ViNOW• • WPw_fww if•<w•iW YiFNi• Ji
N WOPZ00 Z <W wOW''1 _•O
LW•VFHwui •• ==N •J i¢. •N Z•G •V JF •iNOieY f
o ff aWe o •Ni.zN'Y• •i oL°I•
INU OJI~°W •Pe»>i: ~~.(iaiWNyioe.i. .W.i .i «•rprp iuWi°moWeii u°~iWW•°+
> wwFfYNJii•6'J V[fFa>WJiFRVVZMVJ°JVMiJaWOO~JfJJJr
yuyVyyyJ000p000 e-J9 ffWWWWWwwwfOJZNN} WWwJJJ00 « ff
VVVVVVJ VUVOp0000000000WWWWWWwWLL4444444JVVV
NOO•In•<POOnONTn NlNwP000N1.OPPanwONPTPr}Oa•NOPOONn•
NNnryPI. 1•PNPnTrNN O wN NNPNp001.OONin020N•~400NPPTTnPN•
FMwry^ NN ONOF rN O•rRnNNNPNNPOTNnN:wPTNY•
VOni N."•NN O ONwONrNw O OrONi NT• N Tra1Tw
V
:NP
I
~iwni
:3°
iWo
t00
ONO
V i
eoooNeWne of eeeonPNeeYffyfroemNervnefeWeom. re raeee
is e000nOweONee0000NnePOONaNrnNennnNMyenONnnnyieNnNON
O pO Pn:TO~S000POOnNOrrOONOmYNyNnNNOPNynNmmNUyl!iOnNNON
e• ~rwnN~~NrvS~yNN~eSr~nnSSlNrrrlrr SNN V
f• Na N N
Z• y u
O• Jawanf weNNmlNinrwOyNn1 eMrwOyNmlNaM1ePOVNmINiNOwOyNm1
is f0 P P. yp OONyrwrwNNrNN mmm~
PrPIPPrN•~PPPPPPOOOOSOOSO00000000000000000000000000
!• ONNMPwNNNNNNNNwNNVieieeeiee0eeee0eeieeiiiieeeeiOVOi~
Vi i W O • O 00 O WV O
• SJ N
w N ~
OIPO NN \O a niN
•O NP i\ • y0y
\\ • O\~~ ~NW• \i NOOn OOWIOa
u0 wN muNN NPn O{ \NNN Nn2rZry
\\r lP~N
i iwwr• fw«° Ntlfitl sui rW i P:P
i vtl Pwf rf W\f Na oN~ fNO fr{JW
• fW\f eirr fief rOtltlY:M n: NrWffY fWYeO
>f 1\NI Ylfll IIWI Ow11JJP IeY n01111 IIZIZI
NI WI\ Il O fY OWO NUVN ~.
SJPO •a OW~r \NOn NZ V Wi NJ000
:.° VyW« 1«~« eiii« Sna Nl~tl WaN {N{{oem r yhn
S wOZrtl~ UUO JilJrllr Jh~uQyZr
Z• Vfr rninOWn •OwrNW { J 2 WZVVrnr f FFNON
O~ wOUG ~yN NV_ 9f tii fOiV N\F YO n
N• ! •NeliO OOJOWlYNW OWZSN03iNO\f!O NNiNVOYa
NrWIW J f h0 OUf W{Jn 9rnOWinu ZW J ON
f0 NVwZiWNfJrNO aVJONnN ONJiNpN
2NfW WNWNN9NJn NSNNNV Vu0 WO JVWiuz MNN NO
9aJV{OaOll{ONV{{Otl'J{9il u•WV iW~aa VNaVft~
V• JJNWO>J JJ JJWJaOJ2a JJNOrZhOWOW\i2M tOJJJNiOJ
1N> OrwVmOV2VV V V{ZyYV NJWinOSiMn{WiJiVVVWS;VI1LYlU
VWOOSOOOOZ_O _Oa _O _Y WONlNOOU~OJOa00h w2u{ _O _O _OiWJO_O__V O_a 0_
O• eZOWhWin2Y _O J n{22221iVNVZUNfMh\zNY FFO \
W• Nf~wOOw~Wf JO OYO<JUiWiWNf 2•ffWZf~nOal~ZflOl nail N ll >.rY\W
WVZOVWawWNWWOW uOfWWW2WWNYiuheWaOIeOWWW2aNWWNWOW
~fOW{nfPirwifnrln6NNN!!in!>uNWJaiOiWFi{if!>ZOOfif nO
nV O u
Sh!
~rNe
y yy O JV
• O• M n i • SFh~ J• i
N 1u n NVf if a
• > 2• JJ > >iYJ is
• NYZ w02 tiZSS ! w > J OOiui NJV „ CF ZCN
• e90N •iafwW{WIS VLJSW fWVi Ua• •WNhZYW
rZVVWiN yy N NNyy JO VWV Na i
'JN ~OWWOr2i IOiV AIL OW~IaWCJiiJfiiWW Prl~a)
O• aO •yVr2Na J WYWWiZ OW~Jf{OUrW7ZW'1! >t{
No :YNi Nfi +ooo ~atla{atlz pf o har W`~
O:>w7N WaVi QOWO{y• 10= V •utVZWO •OV• WiW: ~~~
• Z ZhJIO Oia• iOVZY• SiNVas •Z u O>V
• JJ 'JN{iem SNNNN wi ~• {OI •hi00i ~!W ~ •N W •PV FOi
• fu iuWVWIW• OuYUJZi220Ww ZVOZSNa ZVNWZZSNh NWrNf{W
_w• uJN {w nll SO__O _NftlfhWWWViNOJW •JYaaWWiVZi> OOW
• wJOO6fRFOaN !!ttl>IaWWWWy00h V1. aOw~JJJii{{aaa\•
2• YuYYUUYUULii2iLZZ22iL2i2TL2iLUN~+NUN 1'~Yn~[YYnYJJJJJJJ
s• NNwnNFareeN.~Na1NNNrePnlaNnwoneNNrNn..NlnfNelrm{m
irvernorafrenNNwlnNnnrvoomNw^elaNryn^hwwfyynweNPOr
O• NN ONrmNyNNNNerNNN1Y NNmOm„a• Pn MNNNrSwNmnNmN
i• rlynNn• •1 •• •mmlm •a Na • rNNaNIN11P •• •1•
3
~fi
DDeoeoeoepe.ef NOeNaoeeeeepYeNpepewoN•eewoow
nn°p eeoseweleeNwNh Pf niNNeeepnnlNeNnwNweonoNheoh~°s eowlpnw
e~.4NNh~~ONwwO.PwwNnnOONwwONNr••eONwNNnOhOhl••~wl•hnwNw
w n n N• r Nw N•wwr N
N N n
JNawpPONNwaNihOpOrNn•OihpPONNwO•+ OI•f PpNNn•niwOPO NNN•M
>OOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOpO09CO0e~pOpO0000000000000
OOOO<00lViiiiOiOViO<OOOOOiVOOVO00i0i0ii0i0i0iVO0•i00
O r
p
~Nw
Ica
VSI
g.°
p0
aNW
.s
W
• ! N
a .w !~ i w CI w gi ~!
ry\ w • J
JN Ohryry 01 N NOh )Y
•• :•\N N N N\ VNN a aMN •, Ja NNO N,[
vN OP\ \NNO P f0\ 7 pnP\ MMNJ NhZ NW
w)P P !P! YP00NMOwI~w wPP a0
PVO~IWS~ `YWw SS >!aM)hP!!a !! \N ! Oi
a raN a•i al f anhYW • !)F< !J
r.YNrvrl r•rn r\ frl sat JYU sri f s
hW NaS• Nh WY YO~Nr V O 091 h
IYII>WN\11 O i hIW 119YJ111 Ot W •IIN 1 10
VY~N60MY~SINJNNw Jh f WlralONSiFrwnrS~WaYONOWYw >
N:e= • i 09YP MN W~WNOIwNNN` N O\OfyOOJTwV NF
J IOS~ONh~NVP\ haw YW<hrnNii •r ~aM aVVNOrnN~O
fr r NWO~/ HO O I •=NW[0 NNNYYNryNMwN f 9arIN>fw NV
•V i 1 i9 fYw i ff OvZLVw Z_ _
9)WOf!!` 00\> \ Yvf<IOVYZSvYYMa!!!>vWWO h •NW
NNy M YVf LL70P > W>h V <N ) as h_h_VNJ Y N
yYiJN~NNV WNOL ZJV ivVi~NNWhJNNNViNNNN ~ i~fNNl~NtNe
iONJryJIJ1lNfJIh Mwt>wPrJOY1JJIJNhNJJJIJ\<OYWy JILiVaJ
fWfVl VI VV NYOP )WV •M>fVYU ))VVVIf V WVW
Y OYWi ! O \ OIJY w9 V
Wyw\0000 WWVO VZYSJJWZ •OOOOWtfO00a)OJ{<hOO)JOf ON
0)i))hWVY)PNO VW)aW)>M Z)))fOW)))VV[VM)<)ZWYZh)
NYZ9•J 9JJri yYyiJ~JfPW9nY 'J ~•jJJ JLJ990 J99J 7YNf i00iN9n9N
YYWWYOVSOWOWOWSW~YOhYO:fWWWWWOfYYYO)ZWW<•ViW WfwwWWp
iM rf vrf<NYNV<MVi >YIYNV VYVOYaWIYYYAwN>YLNY>a>sssw
u
) u
i i e
r z s
< .Nno
J f i •Y
t i • W
j [ W O V U i MOJ S
9 J W •~ l N
VPW V
fE 3 4 ~ 4WD i
N Y V > J JD w f
J 9 fV Np> [
WOE \ 9 VUN~iN WN. N >_ _ •Wj
yOJ N ilnii.Nf1 L•OV ' JJ O . 0 :W•
au.NnrsrWf! .s 9f aaW r9
~ o•. DU ~iNi y o:r if Ji'
NifWN ViVnp •V• V tV.lf VNw~JWi>U Of OH~ni~WSOia
D •>OiViWf000W SNiJiI •iYhOtUf Y>D.iVfNN OaNYfJr<YWW
LO JY.Y.J• •J Wf0 •~» 90 ~V JVa IV
•VOfJ WVWW• NJ)r i0 JO
WS JJ.O >:OJ.~Ni))W.JN• •f)• waft JIW9~~f W_•SW• •9
i. •ff<•i •O• OOV<i>NJ>f •vV•N• •\ • Olf
OIN YrMN<y ~y1'i N• [O•<W_OirWwiwf.Y• N): 000 eNOi>OJN
iV>iip0>fNNWiOYMVeCfIVyVi •OrJJ pi YN9P.WWO<NaFhhWJiYWVOW
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJ[iiiit[[iii[[i)iii[i i i 000
•wOOwNNPN<wNNOwINOnNNNNrPNONfOOSrOONONVPiw
lOihOaNPN•ON•hP OONOOOpwNaw P•NNwwO•TwOar
PNPNNNNMOwNNONOPN JONNrNNTNNNOwryryrylNNn<wNMN•anNNN
N •w1aNPNN•NNwN NwwINN •aa1N w1a• •NNNN •IN • ••
NoNePenva
O NOOOnaPONONhNnVnNO NNnePNwNONONNnr
000 Na00 a~Iw ^PP NONOnOP000°NOM01
N NOOPrNwPm+NNw.•Na OOaPN+NnOPN
e°~iao °e en°ee°e:
w nrN~lowT•°..P•°mi °n .°•°en
ON wNr n
m n a
V ••
0
(nP
fin
J'JaN
n
rye
°00
ML
10
ii
i>
i N
parrPenNnaNawrwennn+NaemwerNnfNanrweNNnfNerewTm~+TTo
e$°e
°e oo'o eee °O eoe ne eeee eoeeoae eooeeooeeoeooooWmoae
>o°e°o°oeOV++m+aeea+aaaaaa°aoa°a°eevevvveeavvee++vv+evaveavva
mm m• m.°W W WO •1°
:• i
J N
J
¢O K O f
J a Z w NVw
NOW f Nf n Jr V PP 'wO Vlw
i¢ S PO °J f•1 JM
n`oa N nJ Hi.N.<
uiN~ 'Ne P^ o Pi `oy "o gwN rrNf
u¢: s ° f~F Kr^y 1: u
NO ` r_WO ~W PP i N ^ yw F
WiN01 06 Ui V fP =M{ W+ iM FwHr
OlONSFn JOV VMO 1 °VV•• sViV
OFwwN 1 •J006 Wr! _r {N YV Of fP
nin nr6w O¢NLL wN :~P f° ry VO nN FFf \F °O¢
r~JW e° iW IM w2Y ~ nN N)V wra "1W ONY0
$j .ion pnn~Wa+Wa
f~n~nrWr~:°ii as ~ Neel- sn i«° aunrvr
7M O ){r••rVY •f { Y wl{MNYN
OSN¢° NaIN Ow NIN OW firNw NV° 10 gZm000
mINOW>Ww •IVINi Wa! OII\OIIN
rZOOffV ¢° NVO~¢N ~SJOZOr{aY _ U00
¢JUatJOJVOi00N VO WJ°WPVwJWefJi~J••~f Wr °JJ nr~OJ'J
~sf hWW WW Fp 'u> io :JWW{fr° rW{13 ur WoW
«pr WWW 0V; .:pWW>fWWpW
NVm tn•Ji WWfff Yrlri hmNSff.f
i.°•F °Oe ii° i fe e~oi `NW~iiJU ZWNN i$ai$ 1
mrN NiVJfI ONT{ \f UMNWNwNf NM•NNNNN
WfV^MJ •NNIrVi•'n{rrJJZN Z••„OrN>NfN W2 rWJYWNNNiiNNWN
W •[f f'LO J1p aJ0 J Stf O~'^ Y YJJVf FOrOOf°{j
ZNUJiifOZUVOVfODU ~4a°uioa°.J.i miJt°.IS NVNVOGUt ari~f MVV\JVVVV
i
>U
V Ni F_ _
V N
N i (Ji N
iNVi•
U ZfN Vfi00
i! nV WS
•OiS\ i Wr
O Z J J NL +i ff
00 ~ OJW r0 Nh
J s oJp a rzi ss WN •e Nri
1 V9 NiZ YON iNOW
V ° miiVU i i W¢ ` i•ViiNi>N\f ~j •f
¢i OiN\~• VNNf Ol 1¢(O iM1NJ°¢00 Wi JV
pJ rfJV LZirJ WV JZ WJV °1606\iF(Vf ON
•• iVJJ OiMrr°NONNNVN
1JfN w0° wZOn rJNf i piN _
Y2+ ~IOJ WVioWW 10000¢ •°11••
WrJwJO`{h ufYiZfi ILW rVVUV •x0°Vf 1
•~ `VJJ JtJfVNJ fJ ( 0iV
WRJV°N0 •°fii OCNN oNFniVrO°(:°V ltafWY
ooJ zN r~eporx .N .. •W ~.a iii
N{W ~w W00 •W NNNN w00°¢JU zJ •ON •••VNM•. wWNNNUrliNf
NM1 VnWNW¢¢¢ZO iO¢ iwJwrw¢Ni•ONN •T N OOOONOWWWfF(
f OO ZZIFf (r=WWWwh fOrW~yp JiwWMWWW f° OrfWOZO¢
WWVV¢>r rTbOOUiLi¢i JJi2'J rTJhTNW JiSS(i(Siiii6W
iNilff Wiir•NOOpO¢N¢ NOf ftfffffVVYVVi
0000¢¢W¢¢GGGC40ppG>¢G>iGY¢ZYrf¢¢¢NiN NNNNNNNNNNNNNN
naNpna NnnTnPraNnOma nPNaNN nINNOraONnwO
nePNrnwnOne/~rnnmNNNnN PNNnrJwPm nhanOnNnNnNNnn
PryNn n0 NwPOnmNwmNfna naNNNJ nNnnNNNPNnON
a.°in nsmN °a Nnnn NNN .N N n NNnNNNnN
J-+
f ~
iNw
1
VAN
sP
SiP
iW0
00
LLn
prA
LL
y
:i
~•
«is
~•
fpi
zi
eip
•z
NoNPa aeeoeOJwaane0•rveeoowawweoreem
o~« eronNOneeNeewwPaweew+ownowwaw« neaa I:
eNw ih~r+erioeriei w'wrw~e+~ri mo rilneri.oewi.ioo
ren+anwrrrwamrhNnmNO«rve«wnhrwP wen
P .. NNe•P r o
r a .. .. w ..
N s
•wm wd«•weJNm+w+«wweYNmawa«wworNnaNa«w
ny~i+ •wwNw~nnwPNNaaadaooeaa«hh«nl-«««
wrrwrrrrrY
iaeoeeoeaoeeeoeeoeeoee•oooeeeeooooeoeese
Pe+eeaaae+eaaeaoaeaaa•aa++daaddaa+aaa+aa
~ _ _ _ _ _
V • 1 • • • • W \ e
i e J ~
V + Y V
t '!
• O VW V•
\~ r
rerw el: ~ m• aN
w mown e w ! Nz
JNwmZ W
N OJwNV~ l O2V
N fPw Z • r VVY N•
•O\••M O 1 J« \ N N eWy
rN N + it«r«J J~ N N ref NON
•w ZYw!!Y •«i w_ «Z i N7Y !_
•O •\ Vf •••\ e yy ii rw Lm~Vr N N•Wi
rn\ NFPr T~ril) i \Wm~ N+O Z~•JN JNWC
Neo SNr1rwZOa \LVidlra avi •IZL
VWJ••wrO Jeaw Wpi • ~
w«d ONI 9t•J\•• Op IVWUNVIW JNMWL „MWN
INO ndl O pOOI11MZZ m Z! pa+JU :W
SOO eiwr~)\fiZ~~fO MWJPPW\V •1• ~W Wp
l mPILVwwSW W10l•W~Hf W~~•L•~UhL•OwOpIOnNiVW•
W.e N::N`t::.:W» lNh.~~YW::a...^.::tom
~V• i NI Za0 OVw6«WYfr
NOO Vr fNNMrW\N[VYWZh{OV WO«i{
Nww mNJ•ONYVNNNlSfOIJOIWJ JOf OaW+\LYVV
j m SYitJif laYrNWViIwJONJO =•JOVwfiN
VN• aOUi~UJ•JVJVtOHV0~~6Nw•i1~wOWi~lrVf
Z
VY n M
_W YZ
N yy M
VV t
i N NZ NOC O Yy[ W p
W )6 •p « 'J O% VOOV
hiY Z) WW V
1 M02i O ZNh V09 •Wa)O
1• tVaO ~ +~ ZVP fM: Y i
LZ 20 N Z Oh N« .e W OONiN w e W
„„ OV sVWN h :Jyy• h VW VV Jif iZW
f i^ZWZLJ•iitVYNyY«1n u of VAN
~ O~ZLWn~JYYV~ hWi~OwY hOW•W V~vJ
IWW WV •O NhiV fn+VW• WJO« ZVye [VWNn
N[ZYWnP)N• eJ WL •YV
N YfnopN• •LNOY• « N
W•eWJ zvrY si~.rNi~°n oe• NNW: srwiee
wYY JJ\WJ4J WWVVV««OwN YI!\«OY L•t! YW
Lfe ayJZV eW LOWWOW/iV iiNW WW a WWWWW[
NVV V WVpVYh)WwP eW« ~Wf Z)•~r JeVYnMhOO
LOO OOOOC)\mhhOOawN+L2r0liNNYaYNaeWWY\W
NNN NNNNNNNNNNNN«hhrN«MFhh 9'J» )sZZlZ)vN
wiN~m~mnniiem i.w.:T en inrPlaannn-ei ~•niw
n PP«NNrvewrwnewwnenrvf«er+nnNwem
Nnn •• N nmNNNN m 1/V+^Jn mr n N N nN
c
.~~
p.
E3
E
..: ,
u~ ~
• •
~(•
f1+•
\•
N•
6t
O~1
r~l~
• 1
W• ~
~~
O•
J~
s:=
ii
ii
9Y0
SZ
~O.O
r
h0
Ors
J
H ~
V
O O O O O O°w°
p O O O 0 0001'~O
O N O ~ NNN=~
N O e N N y
N
N
IOOOONOOOONO000+1000e00bO0000a01hee
Ny+ebO1NOO :O N••OOwOObONIOOO~NOw0001N~
OINONNOONONO AN1110NOO~eNfM N
/INlNNNNNwIwAMryMAw O+lNO
NHHeMNMww01~: :NI N f
wN w N V
N N
A NN'INOh•fOM
• n n A n n NVOMMwN'r•/w/M/NN
fff0f f•yNN+Neh•!Or"rNNQepNNNNNNMNNNNNNNN
JOfIOJ°wN10W0/NN1eP• NM(Y iiViV00<ei
p 00+:++~°i~~°i .f++:+=°000000000
WTMMVOi^HNN~MAH~wAwNMNHMrMM~HfN
)tlwlww•oeeeeoeeoe••oee°e~1+ •
DlN+lwa++a++++'•a+O++aa+
• • N fhr
V 1 1 1~ 1 1 O 1 YN r!+ y n V •YJ i
° js~N11 O O i Y 1 ° NDN ww
M w wFe r hi ~+ NSe f~i F \M =S=O O OVIrIN01NVN 111
MpN' N:\ °ZW : °Ai Nt'^ n =f~.l ri •i \•
'.Y Vfv~V ZO 1 Li T•r t J•^ Y•YVNV V)VYYJUJh If
_ y1WNN Nr •iJ O Ofit OVYWY s H
W 1
r Z iYM~ w • Y OMN/OMiNO/ NN)`J
L W JV Nt•~WNO-i W NwNNeh•IYMf
W : ` Nn1N0 ~fiJJHSWW =OIYlhNOP O•'1NYN0°SMD °
W01f +1a+MIL
Y h:Vi MJ WO 1 rOi=ew/f /L.NtNNN
NiW°Z YV:°in4r
V N hVf ~f JO00NW i WbVWW>Wf N<W
Z• ~ W W•Y :J h1'YOWOOi NVY W••~ tl•e••Y~YO M
N• W erhM ~~N~.f. veJiou ~.i+o iJrW°n1Nnl le uloM n3 ~.rii iiiYi•~N
•• i O \ 1 ~WriO YO•ftlOW7•°WOWWViJN YVWYr'1YYYJJWLYW i
ri J V~ °•Y O OVJZiNSJO 'N VYN Y i V
N~ V • t W\W1W ° iLi°'J IJOJON°OZ°00_0°OO+W~
~ V O V VW\Ni°IrWNZ•ZiOif hDZJZVYYiN
°_• Z r h w Y WYYMJ NVDYNJtleJiO>•t~f Wf••••JlLf ihiYY°JOf NiJ
i • O ' J '• ` it W ~tjit)OCilhfilS iiTiw
'N • W
• r
V W
O i
w i ~ HV• N D
s 1 •
O •Ff•NO O Y
s F V yNV r
Y N p1V N y
i ~{ ` Y` ~ OONNh Yi a
p pOYY ~ itle~i• W• iw :NVF M
e tl ~• r ,
D tl : W ss+N Vf JL~~ (~NM f~ f rNN•i..i. M
i YPM Yb M•f YW NJ f
J
• O Z 0°1 F °~j i• fiMfY VViDWi Ly 4W V fWitl
ifY t ibhwtl i 6f •i
~/ i W iw~N WNZ iw :Jf `YwWV~iViYf WWSibi•VfILiY
' 6 W J:YN = 'd J~iFW '•frf Oitl
W WO +••1'i YWWhhbwY •Wf •2•J OO •y, UWWN`
F •VVtO VNWNi ii OD_WhiNDf ^IW• • i p•~N•{
J ° N W W W •YO WOii4iW111tlV NNyOWih •iW •OJ •ihFWtD
N_ O i OO °DOOVVVV p000GiYi~t OYyYZS~OjNiy•
Y y Yf y
W W N tti• YJW wtl JOtlih7lW OOOJJJJ
F F NhFVf °•~DJ~'W WYWrV~Itl YNFI"JW JO°OOifi9Dtl tl1+
J ~ iiitiYiND~J'•• tl eOVYVY
f O ~ Whh10 OUWVJJ
J ) V f fMNetl Ylltltl+itlf 110tltlYltiOtll•DbOOtl O
NOf•+NlNO+NNNrO1h11•hhh+~°VVIhONf
• IONa° / N•OI'•ONNON •'•'DONhANNNNNMONMNNN NO ~•wi
• n N T N 1F1NN • hHONmNr•• NO N N•i <OwOOi/
7
N
w
f !
fNl
yf0
al
gig"
00
-NW
WL
V
[
1i
•Z
10
IM
lY
V
O
+ewni~aiw° i+o1^"elwea0°Oe wpaeeeNwwae.seoeenee
nwo NNavwwi pw.oe.wpeeo
r°.e -f .aNryn n.w..w.i ~Ipawn ~eowe vesaoeenPNe
^?w~norOeNneNOeNNn..
n enNnweNwownoani l:NVw
N w,f N y N a n ~nrNlN.INPN:YIN •nIN^nNNnP1NYMn_N
N NNNnnPN
n '~ • w
n .. N
L
A h
tN,N NryNNNNNNwNI wIN NwaIn nNIVlPfflfV!
NNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNryNNNryNNNN^OPNNIPPnpPOYNNaP
vvaaaveaavarvaaa NNNNNlnPafavaa
CVV0000000pO00pO00VO000000000pO0000000OONNNNNNMNNNNN
+.vaveaaaavavara.a
lu v IL +Wa•°si~iev eo irve ae.
.• ••
• ~ I: w n ~ ^' r v' n D ' ~ •
ry w p F i rw~ .m ^^f p
o ~ • sn.<i '^ mow
e° ``^ u`inW nO p ~+ n.i a nn• w .e
• V p VNNy p i_ n.V09N n INa Pip ~ NN Pw W
Y Y u LY O• 1= I.Y p_ P OwP wP W
n F Li : 1'
J i J : „ Wpp Mpp ip u°
u y wain yy~ VYO i HMn F! JIW I11 ~
V O y
Yf NWY ~NVVYNNn oi~YiCW LJ U 00_On ~ J11 11 U
VN~N.
7JJ ~LWZ. J ILi00L [L $ON: fO~f p n Oi ~a~fa A~\~[
WOE N OuW OOYMf O> nH~\ YS.N IN YO wW pryN WgNJUf2
~`If o~Nail~i ..a[ +rY.Dai .~oa `e„N YHNJ f• o`Vn `ow i •ez•
.n..'Vn¢
WDLN=IJ i_L nNr H _ 1
•I' YFrOfJOiWJJD efffJWp nNN iYN1M Niti
WtJ ONOVJ O WVV VnapLVNi• JJ ..,JOfWipWW
f~<UnF[MM 1O•iJWNMO ~jOL YVVSfiniVVJJJ00[J
S OfZ NSIW<D¢W0 p YWiYWJOONNi_O==fWJef _O _O i_O _Of [JO
ypn\tYVLO wiW~YnNnL nZiVONWOJJLN
o2~J;JY!! m iNII YpL i[n iiLOpML.Li~~rL W YOHp
~OVw00'i.1r iWNrWp<>WWf[SWWWO IpJL YLLWw,i
UNOJ[pMfOpp\N9 OWIYYVi
i.iVnYwO..lt.y~~n
[
O
WV
~>V ylt w t n N
¢ of N < N W
LNZ N N w y N j i N ~ ~_
V
Vw ¢ iN O N ~~ ~ N p[ N W t
JN? F VH OVf[ S 0~ • V V N y
W OV F[• iJ F WnWiOV u N[ : F O
_ n[ [H W!L YwOnrO > O N V ~ F
U~ ~WnY O~FfVi Y01 [>Nf NMMf• ~ fOwFO Y
¢V OIf¢WJ~O V n O~Wio<¢iiiVWJNS.i nj WWLUW iN
Ye<fWSMNNWNi °zf D`ians
\<WpNWNVF S~UYRO SJ i JuW<`OIFO •> wwW ¢wnn Nf
O iVtif<~i~ L<
Fi iYt[W OWN H i u <r wJ `~~iW N[nOW_
W IL>fNWt4 fIWL NVVryU• FWF Yw Ig UiVwONN• •U wwFiW VO O ~NOen
iwSYJ0000 uujYW JMfZ NVNWGGY[OYNW>O¢¢f<WnWVRW>OWOV
VYVUVVVVU WYO •YJ[iNi nN NGIW W1l wf WNJYO
000000 WWWWWwWLI<l uLiy4~~ViD.n<__Y « DJ> r0
. 0 NN m.w T.pnVP YYYY S NFY
'0POOOnnOVOnyNn00
NNOOn O00N~V ~O WN4PNrwuNVIW±N1wmaNyNmm~NNN~~pw
S ...Nw.
N
e
.:
~ 111 OI` O> O!
W• p0 01 O••OOO:Ia1>001lw1.1~
O• 0000MNNOwON?0000 NIVNwP
•• •• NwO01O 0N1i1a10•^IIO F••O NOwwlnNwhONl~lOwaNOn~w NIln NN w•-JN
jn0000 w•.~ A^ fNnw ~
Nn±011 ONNNi a N M
P•l• p ^IONMnNN w N N
O N
• •~ NN
O • f : N
y•)•
W: ~ NOwINMn~JNNNMNNTn
~••O• WHH•~•nIN NNMMNe~0000000000:1~~1~~~•O~O +O:~~~aaaa0aaaaaa
:s• oo<ooaooiiiaaaiiaaiaaai ••ww • • N
• !e
:i: ~ O w0 !y •waJ N i! w
~ ~ V ~ t i a al10~ fw pNr fOrwi ~, y NN w
• O > w0 1~ iNN JYIA W
^ • • • O NN ~INi w^ wNMO' ~ `ww iR00 J T H Y
rwwn M•V•N
P ~ i • ~iiiiN 00 ~ P• e1 •w 1 u
nJww Nlj NOO 0000 y• N w fNfp N H J J
V V • ~ 0V0~ Wi N N• fif W Nw Iw fMlt W P ~iNNf
• NI yy
fNw % • V ON>`l•1N Of Off OJ:••WyMOOS OWJi JiM%1N~Ji2 rM• O • WMN•Ni
Q.N ~ Z Otiry WN\!~j'i)21.0\~•ONNMri~O:'.Oi N!,NUYJhN<>'ONS~t~iW~t
WW 000W0 NI 2WiNJ0 OY
Vi •• ~~• f0 00•'O NI•V ~SI'VNOil=NNNNNiN tWWNN}W~,~1Wy~!NYOI fflOi W>JO
~ VVN Ni w'J )Wi NNNJJ{JWi ~VV`f2V•Jf >f iCw~JNiNV1
l00 F• "'i1 N'JONN:4 `J JYiONjal• 2WY JJ WV N WO~IOOW
0NW •f• MMOJiVUWW~Jff ftf ~~Y0000JGlJiWf01•WNJZ)iNNNf'N0 It000
iN• V
OJ• VN~ OVf••NOii•NWVtit JMOiWiZ N'JYiW1 JOYW17WJ
• OJ •OiWW WWWWWW>N~~W
Y 0 •~~ W>~;WW±W JPOft6OGi>tf el00>WO23JOfiiitNWOfrCOVYifOIfO
NJJ~OfiNNO
~•>i•
W J V
• : ~ N
• • 1 N
J j
~ • e \ 1 J
• 1 f $1
• Z
• t'. o g
N ~ ~ ~ ~ N W
i OJ O MZ f f
•• f ~ W l W N>N N i•)••1 V O a JV
j ~W VNti _J y!
~ • i~R • •f f Y VNNIW'1M LL OfV y~• N J W• •
• • : Vl i•• O ri •V Nf JiN •JN yNJVi Nf :yli WiONNYNOI
~ • N=o ~f' N1N tOi laN ~iiF•=)= iNNJNViO •~MNJ• VJ iVfO2W
~v • ~ J6NJ=yNV ~fi •OOPinfN•••OY •J •i• ••~J JiW••W •UOItINO
• • Z W•M I_+> LLNi •'VONJNUiJMOJW:t•W>ONS
• WZ•[ Vf NN f0f•~\!0•
j • • OOiO• WW NONNJ• JWN}VJJVM)O VVSYfatNG~J)Nr~VifZJO>N
00> ___
1. ~~. ~ ~ JVYNIi 7~NJifIW•tiOJj~ittttt~iiitti{L ii00wnn0'Y O:'r
t •NaN •YN1~w
1~~ •_• rn11Of •[•t •[1[1[JJJJNN<IN ~n>ONOOm
~'~ : ` N~NA:nNnN•IO NNIIlM~J •INIMNNONww'NN
f NPNOONN N PlM~ll1 •Nl•
.i. N
,W
:>.
c
.:
~s
V~
+oeeeeeooneeesieeeeee•nNOpeenwewoeoowoeosoooooppeeo
eewwos•Nweeeo+oNweNeo+•onoNNaeNOeownesooNO.ooopewe
e••.••.•.••.......• •.••• r . ••. ••.•r••.••...
O••~.NNwMON.NTNNN••NT{•alNNnwNNawOnhOOwO+lni•N e~JNwTNfalf
O ww NOOTN • Fl hn ~ ne
• w .• N w n
V •/
O ••
iNP
J+O
yie
yS IJ
iLL
LLNw
Ns
J
Y !
V Y
•i
•i
s
~+N+h.wowNn+noh.weNnn+naN.PeJ«T+w+>-woNNT+neh{weNNnf
WMM N«NT~nTTTTmTT + NwONMwwNwN r~r~r~r++ mahhMNP
r•1T ATTnn TTwwwnT~~rr1~~~~~~~TTTTmTTTmT Ir 11 Nr P1 I1 i1 PrTTTwT
oiiaeo ~a~iiii°e+iii~°a ~aiei+++iiiei~iii°a ii ee i~~ei~++°a °i a.°•era
u! o . . .
JO
y JN J i«
~~ i aN C
Z wn ~'• iJ0 O O N OH N• w
h« N !
Irw V ~N ~ { N hya h! ~r
Mh J N:•F T hTT -+ ie w a00 OV hah J
L- hN+( w •O. T N• N VITL O
YW M ~phf P Wlr jr P M•ml NII~fhF •i•N w h
VV W• V L W O ~VwV i
W YY » p(N h _Y _h h_ h NWJhJLhOY-iW NW h WNV=V y
I ZyYP L L .N VV~Op F-OLNy.1 y
W 00~~ yiYJWW JYW W04W WiJYi WSYh•WV VW••V ONON•
^ ••f0 ii VVNOVV VN V MW:VVWVOV V VyNrV UT•Y
~•V OhViYhOVW NiN OWIYYh Yi :m`~IN
J wiL ( L\.ii{. .NUJ JNOf:Yt .~N.{'J .Jwf W N ••„
WO NwN+W y N h • MOWY J
N NNYM iL\9YN\>MN•NUNNWMONiVN~NNONN~YN`i NNMN iVNNNNO
JJ•-iV hWOiNJYjJJ~JJ\i.iO~J.lJA~~OOW\YJ l.iIJ WpJJJJi
N VVMi FN F+V~-VVYYV N(„•FOVi wYL y~Jh VNVV ILYVVV•
i YIN+Iin•[iZi J .OYOW NF O f.f.V a e
J N~LL(Y~NNJ NO.WLLYLLh-hLOLLONLILJJNLFiL-LLJLLLLLLf
i
p
y uli- a .s
OR %f V V
NV NL JF_O V_O
O~ V Y ViF _O W O
FwN i VSSWf
iWW Wn •• N NO
ry ZO LLpphyy ! if 6V W
WNF LEI :' OOaNN J °:R FwW y
V VVf N V> iLLOMV WI
__ {_tN a-. OFZi NV
NV VVO LiOfO Z•whFiLi•tV S OJ'i wS f W
O> tV=JZSF• S:hJWZ.~NSLL•O••f0 Jp_O_ _
SJ WOpae V_ Jt•• VN~nZOWNawu Z V SZ
WSNh:i __JNVLaW ~Vwm N irNnL>irNJ~~
F LL\NNS •iVViNi •'9V LLO w0 •V~iNWWNO ZZWVWZaO
OVinni ~ON• •MNpN SON si W fe•>N• OZOfVN p2W.J
NJ YWSiVV-Ne~iWW.f JfW S wnoSLLJ OnOi i ii V
.y0 W 09JZ ~ JWMON•• nWV~JJ.'ei=~~~~0. O
OLVFYV NOOOi •NNUyp •_O>••fLL if__•J L_J__O+ ONrNNN yOy •S
iM>«O iSi00SiNNOW Who>w=w0 f w0«W!M1>(if ~OJyW
J • yyVyyOiWnRZW OnV VUSJ=f
iON~JOJLL~f2iif>OOON>O LLIWl i22 LZZFN SOO+LLwaJ N~i00pOiiNN
:LOYYS if aaW OOOVf NNNf\VUVVWSNNNNN OHOff LNOOZ
LY6 MYSYP.ZZ{SY. NrrN NMNNN NNN Nh>Y>hhhhF>
wONnNPOPhTNON~„NOh•eNP•aw.NNemnaO a{:Th•J>NOOM1.J
•OINNNO>ONOaN> •NNONNN•• ahO+PO.VVN N hn.eTOTTTN
N•NNNNhNONN~NNNN•NnNNN NrNn nVNrw NNNNNNNN1XmM1<m„rry NMNN„N„NNI
NNNNNNNNNN TN NN NN
O
E
:,
N,
WE E
u•
i
.• weewaal• eo 0
ih2• new«aaa• weo ~nlion
iiwoi~iw .ii r«i. •iw ,o
~i «Nwn P««aw+e
~ NI .. «
oiai
\• a n P
•1• «
~•2• n
W• +
h•
O•
•
7I a A
a•
•O• JNaw•PO..NnIN<wePO
•'p RRRARRRARRA~
is eoooooe•eeeeeee
t• OaWa1a11'Iaaaal l'Ia
•i• a
• Y • 1 •
• ~ i n
• • a
• • a
\ •
i • a
• • N
V J
i • • « NV 1
• • nJ w
aNP • • Nw wV nY O
y{N ~ w tin
910 • • N +~
• V a
• as O
if+ ~ • W aW Na NWUy ~
•i• YYYI NN
iWO •O• YW w0 U«WUN/W
00 J Wa an `.Ja WMM
~h• NY JV WJ
aNV •.ai• NwaN 1wN OaY:
w• «t i11 NVIaai9
OJ ~V~ PtJ iJ09..N
•n• 9MY OV MVyh NN
W ~p 920eNiN0 F90'Ja ~
V • awiiJ9ai ~JaiaW2V
•i• 99W..+9 • 9h«9r
anaaaJla csaNaae
~M~ \\WWOWTW O` SOWW
• OPaOwiVf YOt«V6i
• •
•
• •
• •
Y YJ
9
• NJ
•
• J •S
• ii O WZ
ur
VFW VV iJ
9rw J
~ 6J+
.1ii N
• •WN. C
• N91Jh0 WiiJw
JIN
V1 i9+ rIWSaN
GZW ~i0201J
• 9IOWi9i f0 1af1
J •9ao
JW• YV=p ViteV
•120 •iW iv•
• NVf.WiChh hhJYOS
j{j •iJ.IJNN NNJJa9W
•1 'J ir11WWW WWrpWOW
•2• h9)1f222 2i22.[hN
N NnhwNn•
w<N NNPNN
• •2• NnNN N NNN N
•w
T•
O O O ONnOOnOPJOOJ0000Ni0>001000pO0000IN•0.1000
N O O O•tlN000NtONlOOONOMINO•OOOOOOOONOwIiONtOOn M
• N ~ y NOMIOaM•aOtNaO~N•w•N•!•O.OIONnhO1MM•lhNNh i
n N At nw nNNNINNw Ny=+NN^h=nNNOhNryNlw•NaNNNa O
!•
y
1 w
MO
X10
YVI
~VO
l w
{O
DO
he
OY{
_ '~
_ {
A N w
A A T
A A T
J~i11•N yNOwN VNaM•OOyNNINaI•V IONMN•N•M•OOyNNINtYe>OyNNtYP
WyNMMPOIe~^~~^ yy ~ NNN NNnNNNN
Vt•OTNN ~~~~~~+•~~ II• tVttttaa•~~Itt~'It 1•at••
>.aie•o•eooeoeseaeo•oee•••a•••o••ooe•e•e•e•ooeoooeee
•NNN•aa•a1•+•••aaa•aaaar••a•aiaaa•aaaaa+a••+•••t•oaa
V 1 I 1 I O O O a ee O O • O V 1 O
i aYa NV {Ne \ • • ON
OOVN e • a •/e\ •• MQ
~ N=NJaV• >1 3iY M N •VIyN N a
` O iy • \O{N • it yN tY N ^ y.• •N1
N «' 00 yVON ^ iNN {YN i w
W 1• J eN0 O V NNN {{N
V1V Vyy00 NYV JNN { • NNN {y N Ow0_ WO_NV
V iV V\ V V VlO Y• W~> V V Y•i• { 0 0 • O= Y Y V V
VMV VO•L• ~ VOON{ML• Y O.O M { Ye WV
Vw Y Me 1 V> O{ y LN O M
9 w Y N 0= V•.Y ~ 1" `f Y 1•V>M{s.i Y•• > niY~ •V•Mw
J O\ YY M YVO• Y i >i\VYO LV Y VJVO JVJ
i= JN YOi f YNiVY { JIYYVYVe V e t YN V
• •~Ji OY~O INVyY OYYJiiV NN iY f0•
1 . i 1•~ ~1ry .sN. . .Y.N.. . yo :NeN
O •1 N~~ OOO V •Y~ V•~eYNYyyi •NN NNYi • iN J_
O •YNJ O iNVNe NOFr910•NVyA N~{ONON N
O \ NY_ 1 Of •Y yiN WYN i i0{Y NNNM riyy•
O O w e J_F {OMhOaaOy • OYO Yi•ONN ~ ~ yWe{n{e{
ipY WONiV VNNIV O it ~N> 000 O
OaMY N IIONN ri WN MM>NMNNN{yiN00 N
{ i>eYOYf M>1• >VMYi MVNyYNMI• NMYN~iNNNOhNh
W i ~ Y y•yyJjMNJONIJOJJ IN``yy10 JJitY1NW 11 ifi
= O {YOLi{ff iO• JYyp~JYSiJJYONJ>J M~JY•YJW O
V Y~~i11{iMi1 riTV05$ JYV>O {i"VVJ=WY+Y~ WV{Y~Y: T
V 1 ~ V Vi~OVVY>YOVOYNIOiYVJOp Y00••{YVO OIOJOVi10a O
Y• V 9 N{IiFYY1NiMYMiViONMY if YYiiY~iiVi• ViyO{i{ 1
V 9 ` NNJ i•if OiYYYYOOJYNi Jiii 9>JYYN~JIOY~Ji O
J < 1 +MMVNVV{rMa{{eY{ai• {{ VY{Y{{{S{{YW{W
i ^ J~i fYV YJJ YpyYf JVYr WYO VYVYyOWWWVfW> t
i O J VVONf Ni~~V•{~ Ni>~•>i•I~VVY~{OOVNVf VVa0Y0 O
N N i
O O
y W
i O Y N 1 O V Y\Y
1 Oyy V ~1 io N M i>i
~ M N NO NY f N V VN W
i J iY Vi a ~ > Y N• •.i
C V 1` V pYf WM L V N OpiO f0
Y; i Y `» Y • V i OVY
Y J W V J{• ~> O N WYY y y a ~1
~ f l V O NY{M Ni J Y WJ N YY VY
> M N OY N ^ iJW JN yW ON
Y ! Y NyYY~ ~{M it Y Y NpJ W ii Y_ Yi
N 1 iiM iiJ • 1iJ f V YN OL:>•LNNN Y ~~
O Y N W`rWNNOV>~~YN{{YVJOOYOi ••Y MIIMNyi1N11IW iy
V V O •iyNDi i~{V~VO ~Y WW IOYYO~tOV •OiF
Y NNN ••J{{YON VYiYiiOWMMNYFIYN y0{NYO YIN
> •t N'J N WYi1WN I'1 OOPYfYYYFN > y NNO > iW
V •OVW OVOOVYVHi •Wiii YVNWWI •1O •i• YY f
V 1 i YWVNEO Y X11 •Ii 1. Oi99VOOJJNN• MYYW•
V ONVYiV • •V •Y NN•I• YY{OOOOi Jf W• NiWNNYN
• { W iIJN NyeeYMyy YNYfJJ Y•yVNeJJ{N• YJV Y~J~JiWy
f ~YVLJIOOOYVaVJY i1 >JJNVOYYiY~~i12{i•
O O_ O JVJiiil{VN90••{O{O_WWNJON'D O11 {i11WLLLMJ ii00000
L IfIIfO01110OVV VYYV•IYVYYYVYYVVUVVYVYV
N • O • Py1N•eNOONI•a00a•NPN•hhNMV••i•yONNNMINNNiF N
la• N N : ^ e••1~••NwN1awNNNNtyyNe~~NNNtwN•NMN>OJaNNry
i • NNwN aNNNiMa M • Ny•aiNl11• • • anNaY•
/~
ew\eeahWew.IwoNWnesNneeeeoNOea\werwneew•ees
°W ionniiNww•on•oon\NNweN\eNwN\asenso+n~...no Neeweeee
iiir ssiiiiiiiwiiiiiiii~~i'~Iniiirii iilnii il=eniiwiinii eai
nlaOwwwOwnb=^n'p NOa= wNaNnNNM1„N NOnw^N+O+nnN
n nnr
w r•1 O N q NO
r NN
V v
E n
iNw
7f0
/1
8Sr
ZLO
•o^
\r•
OML
J
Y L
L
JOJMnINawVIONNNINrPVwONNNIwawVIONNN+M aI•VlerN=lNrwrwO
x::s:ssssss::::::::::::ssss~as=:::::::::::s:.:::::::
eoeeeeoeee\eeeWWWW.eeeooeeeesoeeeeereeeeesooeooooo0
'>oraraaaaaaaaarrrrrrr+araaararaaraaaaaaaaaaa+rra+aaa+
Y
V \ • V a0 • L \ • \
iM ! w i !O
V\ \ Y ON w e
r O rw N\ rN\JN a • w
i« e31 i i wi i~ ~n~~ai n ~ r oN ie einw wNN
n •1 eN/ iN N • rhea/\ • • uw \e ~ N\JZn\nN.
e -.in h ira NerJiNWir e w >i :r u N ew°^^w
~\M NO fVW VN\YN\\\LVn Y\ V O n \
H \ i SWL W L as O\ wV0 E I Wt~\w\L\
YMM YV YtuL FY ILY •O\•IW \NJ LO itM LIW O
Y NY JiV IaV M1• J~YI~wVi~tiM\~ V \YY 'J V•JY FL\L-Lj IYVJ
WJ 7Y JO WYN LIJ iJ J 1 IVOLL J OOb JV i•IOrIIW
V iJ i F YNYV w NW WY r• OrMY:i OVWfw L
uN VWN yfY SN JY VV •NL •OY Ni JIiMVY V •M V\OOL
L Yy 1~ !YY WNN Ly1LLMrLN L W»W•VWy pVW My Y
~ NiL i NY\rNOYiYW7J 7YY r LFOFJFJS.ON 99• ~~^
•• _Y _O VWM NJM •WWVYIwOW MOL•M VYYYi IFJJI\NMI
W ~VOi VON YN \ LY iy~•hrLiVh L` V
9 LON WYV VVO YWLYVLOOL Y \il 'J JN/Oaii LN E \LO
WzpWp•rirEi~err3eNZezWOS..oNW a zro:wNr • eyieNz
MYiVOr•ii VfhhJwhiNnOVhVVhL•hMV NMWNNFJrJ O yWy IVV _Ji`WWewN •JJ
~/JE°iiYNYYwSNOENENYNNYVOYON JYV\~NpViiiw OEN~LJJO
fVVN ViFEOLNiMwJJfJJtiJirYJAVN•O'IOVYSJiFLf \ VWYVZ
rNFVOYJ f<MiNVYO\faf<~<•VVO•w0< OYMyEWJ00 rV0 YOOY
NarOiir~L/ rOM~wYOh•whVh>Viw/?JhiiNYYiihOY/hOJOieeF
M•\rr~WOiiN:iVJM YaJ YaWO)EEW•J>•OIWrOVYWJVrOy<VaJYOVWVWJ
<OVVYifLEOVEJN•NVf NONNSL•OVNwVrayLiLOEVVJrOLi00MVVL
J •~
r N W i
~r O h Y V rr V
W • V Y ~ • u Y1
•Vi 9Y W O f V E NW tN~ y
yi4 E S !
N Yw•~IO F i- N N O O/ J 1MP ViM E
f N J VN I~ • Y VW J J i^ Wr
Vi ON/r VNnMEJ! V J •iiJO iha ~ ••i OJV YW
w: •ai iW/rrYr J YYi +• i• NfYO- h„ f M
N_i/VM ihOw/JW{ O O-iNLNVY •JrVM ON• /V
M N YW h3w~rN\ia/Y>00 iNY •(VYNi YY'/•Y~Wr>V •/•
t• i + WVVWwWi•wwN/nrW/ iih ii JiNOYEWhNJ
V VNV•WJhfNM=V YIVYhiii//NNNNO • iW iYYJh0001LW/hM•W
Oho/W 1JJN •/ WM•VaOiiWW ^«9 ••OtNYV/MWi- Y/WNVi~
LWW VN OV Y { V li W 9w J Ji• OV-
V M/•aiN iOi/hri •N• • (JO• •V E/ Mi
•t• ViO_OW9YrV/MyyO/W /f1 •h yi117•/MMO •(~N1 JM00000••/WNN
WrFNi 11WM VrVf LEOOiJhiiJVVJiWOhV•W~rrMifWhN{jaiiWWNMWWV
3h>YWi-aYNNVhV>MJJOOi/haJJJWWF/f /NVJfMEJJJiiiiNjMYi
OOOOpO0000YWYWWWLLLLLVVOVUVUVViiiiiiiiNrNY 1771y1i{1•tyW
IJ/wONNn!/nwNwlwVwan01101/ONPaNrNeen+r+ahNw«wNwwNnN
awnlw+/nweNNnrnnNeN•n11NwN•enN1«aNJnw••werNNlhhenNw
N\n^w^~aNwlTw\N~wNnwlnnwnnoNnneloaeyN wwnn\nwr+nnN
w~N ~• a NN NNaN111h11n 1•nNn NaNIM •In
1.3
oee••eoheNOOONe.NeoNlNeooryeNNeNnwoNwYe.eeNOlnYOONhee
na±.eNenleelwrNOeNnheNOnnWwYhwePNlNOYeowWlaeenNNNs
OO NNaNO1NOYNJOnV•NNOwIOPNnNYNM1OMNNJnaPINOaNVVnNhMwON
w NwalnNnNw1YMN=Mnw=yNNnN^n ryN•rNNNOr~rhlYhN^I JNN:IN
1 r n n N
N
y
V V
O r
iN 1!1
~•O
01~
SSi
00
-NW
Oj-
Y
•
Wt
[:
{~
••
D•
Y•
••
i NNIN•hYwOrNNIM•hVwOrNNIN•hWPewNnIN•hYwYrNnIN•hYlew
IIN NNNNI•
Y.l.::::::.RxRRRRRRRR~MF~.~~a„~a:xaaax.~~a..NNNwNNNwN
>PWeVOeVeVOY.YY.OVY.OWWYYOYWOp0000.WOWWe.a...P.YWOYC
o•••v•••••v•••••••••••••••.YW•••a••a•••••••••w•+•o••
W e W . .. ...
iN yNpr i i „ VN)
YP Ve\! Y P N • ~
N ~ T
\! ~\ ` N \OMY ~\Nb\f \O h- w r O ONN
•_ •J Y•NMY •PGGS NW y0 NY W1 V yPrNZ
P^! •V OP ! YOPY< Y\w \`~ ry yN- 00 ' a <
~ \ VtY Y YVMlwYi00 N
• --W W••• w )Ye Owl WI YhOY yh~ VV ~NhYZN
\Y\ N--O \ V ) V <\• OJ Yt O NJM~ ~J• rjVIVV
O O P -jV0 Y-• Y YOw -O ZN:W:IV -: O YVi2
IWN :YII `r Y R`V: \tiWY-iP Ny M O V•= w
YO -<\ li i-nu ~+eYiu a
iIW w•f YIV 1 W IiOwl It O• Y\'J )Y i YrMMW• J
Z lu OWOVN-• hl in I W1:\ Vh WVYWMM rY JJNY=Ww
OhYOi-w0 OYVYO OV O Vi hwVY • YOJ ~f
VN by ~ ` i N~~~-VO-YMw -r Wt • WO WOVrNOYN-y
fwlJ IN)Y I ~ 1~. •Ow OM W W •WNVV V V7VYhWr
•N - h1VV_9/J Ww hVVhw NyhywYh V • ViNW<)« ) VR>VWY
IVM`JW<PNW f0\• Y'l-IOh-a•Y0W- Yn OOMWVW rWWOi-ryU-:O
J NV-Q~f VOrw VY hVN V LV> iy YNMY OJNO.
)N• OVh• N hNil NhNfn01 OYPY •OFIOMYhV YJOV
IM W)•T V<Y YN w)NNYYiNNM NV YiPI ••JVV iN < Wn•WMyV
•<JyOV`JM>•1J»<!!~~ i``tt <i•IM J NY IJrVN=W~WO{ VeOhYNY
JpZWV+O NO Ja~VnJY~VJNJ 00 OYYV VYWNZ1YiW y
y0 «O^OJO<OOVr: yNViY YO VO Ji^n>NWJVYYOhVV<i VJO
O LiL iJf VL) VW<i rJ •<VM1J VVVVIZZ!•V MJN
-OVY Py« VWOY WO)VIOVO)WLYIY~NhV\r<t< -<J W<• <
)MF ~J wNOYhN )NO{)OVNi){V)~=X00-YVNNh»FN W<Nh\INYYh
NiriVY M YY9)- )! )7 ) •J NI iF M)V iWhJ
V\ar~V=<- ~Jjp<W-•'J~ W-~ O-V-OWZYV``pp VV<Na--i)<J)Y NWhOW ap)
OW\~iJn~N~\-lV\1-YYJJVI~Y~N~HM~•f-JOMNYVWSWwiCiJNN1
Y
O •i•« f Y
i y
f1 ~ O
W O i i M1 f J M1
1 V n = ~ L
O N JL O r N Y ) F „ -
2 V^ N faa• V u p
ih u SY Y i R •Oi O O ~ w O V N O
V Y M i JJi O a Y Y •V V J M~ J O
y1 1 ) f ) J V Y
{V \NW V ) VY•Oi\ >i i\N \ •V.I FY iN {MY~V f ~ \
OYJ-Fr { Y•SMFYi>1 Oi0 V•j j WYfJYY-{VMW ' 2
O~VJn W1•{{JVVM1YViYV NiVi fWJ Y OYirJfyy 00• J
7Y~NOVrJiiY~Mi~h••~~ iiVYrOVirAJ Yh~~JitW~V~O 00 YW
J9V>O YJi000 SOJ •JVhff NfW{OOYM1J = M1 NN)W- JV-)V
V M1YaOffNY •• •~J1h i7 00 iVV)W W • OM^pi f{tiV
Nn{t-ONMOf Zf VMii{JYf •••VJJ• Y it 0_ O
t J V Y{9V ip
VffiW •» VOHOV{iVJ W)Ni •i J)NJWOOWNNNN OfVVWi Y•i
:;NNO~J Ny SWN)-WOWN {ONY Of OOf`YY{VSMVVYf OY WWWNIN yI
NJ 9NVyOJWrFVVi~VfM1YFyN``yp hV•WhWWWWhW~h{OpOOWS
)O)Y)IMVYYi0Y 1YN M1i{YYNhJI VYVVYJYhM1MOfiVNO'J{VYV
JJVfWWpO)hfffffVVyy 0000p•NiNfifffWWW_W W__SN 01YYfYYN
WYVJJJJJJJJ){{iiiei{{{ji(i{i00Y-W----• -~----YYYW
:~wNwNNNNe•PNwwInMhY)hwa••IN NOOaNaNVNNNnNOP•MO•PNNrNN
nn-VNNNOIY~lnN»wnn Nlw NwNlwYwlMf•w-~Y~r•NNNOYhYYN•YNVO
IfNr N NNNNN• NI• •T• n NNNN••r 111•NryNrnNry N NMNn
I
.:
•eueneeNhhw rlennpveeree<oooeesNeoroNlf.ae»pneeee N
r e weNNw •wewaNwee•anNOeeeeW/•ewe~~efnaf~<nnNp e
iiniw re h•:INr •NNw a.iwnpnnwwweii.~enw~no.•roawnw~wnnnY
NNTMNwVrM •Oaw•^ as 0e ••N1:rynnnnnahN„wnaVwwPrOnrrey
N rwNVVNn1
r M Mr N • yln
f v
V_
iNw
:_ ~'
O
89y
DLO
{Or
o•N.i
J
~ a
Y L
<•
l•
i
w
0
::
M~
ri
.\.i
H~
i
O•
i•
h•
r'
N
n
f
J NnINV•M000rNNVhOw+O+y+N+N+w.+I1+N+V++h+ O~O+.OrNnlNah/wOrNnINVwOwOr•~•N••
W ~~~SX~~~1NIIwnNwwnwMMMMM~N„~MnnhwnMMN V~MwMwIlY1 •<wnwnn~wMw1
OVaOVaVVaVaYaVVVeVVVVVaVVVVVVVVVaaVaVVOVVVVaVVVVaV
W• • 1• L • L • •
Y n
nni s . i~ L .wi
•_T N A N Mi YVV ~ yW M r
i p w _/< „NO /n N /
y\{MM/W ~~ r V ~w/M~\r fh 1 ~ w Yr
\<NYn\ YInO •NLn01 Oy Ji T NNN•Ont
n^hONSy< v hr0 V Veie°n w fV w uu
NrJY•N•L / NYwYL SSN(2M Y• ii ~ MJJM F~Iiw~Jn
Y N r N i0°/htr •y+ :nom O\ Y y M<p w•wYp
1•:~<u uE r//~wYN< ~ h $i .~ w $.°.ht ~~uwf.hi
NWYSWJNnI O O i O IL•••JJN°JVJ fr
•Nt~Jh p0 IN f•WNYryLfOf/Fw Mh O~{V VaY /•f•
OYL • e NJ21L/N OWOY e• Of fr-»wL •• L
r +r^Nh nW~r~{ fi~N~~ryeuwr li r r„ W o WV
JW 9N N w Yw N••rN N/ <~SSN V_yOWN
r0 NL/Y O OrL/i„ JYYLL< LO\•r~y0 FF O Iyfj
IWhNL O f OI~ LV/LrL f/Nn OMr1
N•n OOY NO\NNrOS •00 O.O'ewY~ 7 On L •rWL
YM V OnOOV\YLO Ff IVy =»r~\y iY OW
ere<s ° e e•efrJpsu a so/Ipzr ~~ o{pe•p
Yi LJWhiO < n0° OwVWLtWin•r W/Ww(OZp O• YOi• (
3{ VYfW N /y(WYr••~1f YeVMOn •N,rNJYONJ»W "W`
LLYN VYfS N /~Y\N\NWJYYi•VLYrL•Mf \i90LNnWSO
<VOrYOffLfn : L `= =1 O• OYOnW r O`z Oyf jYWFW
L{WnrMw YN w u• w/NLNMN/NO{YYNi OJ• YLVV
L=M <h• OY W Y 9• • VteYywYWY•rMN <
MM Nh\/Ww0 Or OaJ/hNVrNOnMMh (/ JN/ °/NM/N
iN /__YIJ{f NMn nnJn~WFJOYJYrfJ JMMrI°OJ<wOWVfVwYNMhN
L9YLOh p\r~i/t``JJ<9rfhYV WVfrJJYY if
JJ py1O Y f O~1OiJlWY8/OJyNF•MLO"NJJJOJ
\VrNO~OnL\h AH`INL;20<Orf n>M•YfJVO//iLVLOLLNNNLVVYY
3 ~ /
V ~ f
VN J O M
I L
Lh Y L • w ypjj
LJ N Y < N O O
O<Y V MM x V iM
NL< x • Y Y Yf : Z• L
W
a== a "si g e `/ y~ f e e
~ OY < h MyWy O • r L/<WN•ILJVY
N/• 1 O ri00~ M W Y NY\O ~f~f;•Y w
~ N>W • ~OOr M<w OtWw `r : `p yy y
NNiV• O OV Nf NYYNNV:NJ Y j Y^yY=~/VJ~•iir~1
JYIYn• J<N N >rVZ'J Of O• YYN M<V
yy aO >^NLYrpN t°•!•YY yj nhi:
YNOOh• i~W O~~r~NyiF1Ux EY s{J ~ OYJjr-IOWWWO•
VV<M YN YV O •/OOY F <W /yr<jOWVWLV\OOYj
i_Yi pL• wY WMi L • iw •O <NJWWJ J /Y°p
M Y V W L yM iNlONYYf M O VLr\YN VYW<000
Y W xW•/JM ~ W•Y! Ji Y •~N wj YW J • OVJJZ
Y YL YJ JJMWjY<WNJtOhNNMZ /j Y00-<jYf •w! f/Mj
YFYLY w•NrWf VfiLjLOTNWYMYl YLVOW\f WYY>MYYYryMVYYO
___ YOU VYYhh •\W (YS.t()Yi YhhJ r/n•MLOf•C•
fh •VY•N /7O•<W/i~aYY00fMtNMWrrJiNJYNNJ/09Vi
YYNNNNNHNNN NNNMNNMNNNNNhrhrrwh90999L--ZZZjfY>-VY
aN/N/IINhV/ N^n1/r<OOr1wVrNf arlnnNllwawl/w101wNOON
wnwewhwwNnh n wnnwl/wnnenNn/nw/wewNwNnwVhNOwlrywwY
Nn~rNnNVy T •1•n N~IeinnVNnrnNOrnwlellNVNMIwrnVNlNn NMNNN
/~
~~ ',
~i 6R°YRi -
F '
Ss
gs=E
~ ...._ms
iaza
.
we~y
n%ima^~
~G
~ ~~' F
SC~F3
£_
.
- ~ _
_
-y E
i~
.. fi
°aF m ~ ~ i a
' :s'~5
~E
S-f~.S' ~i s ~= a
~
_ 4{ys:
$
. .Pe ~ S _
[ '. ~g.~F
bd FS.S.°.'t, .^. ~' %•. a ~.. =.._
~
= +=_
"
~s s '~, i '
0 a ianF
i=_T:~
.:c:
5 e l ~ .
'
as
ic
' ~ 'a~
~-
3 s:~i-
_
P
Y'
k ~
~
~
ei.,F Y•n ~
~ 1
'',
I
.~.
.. S'iY:d
..p 'Y.-' W
3 G9:
]..- ~ ~
N ~ \w
_ .. ~ s. ., o °7r ~ _ ... 3 ~ 'S O
/W .
FO ~ _
e~'I ...,. n .... .......... .. .. °r.. °
Ra88a%88x88 R 8 S °xRR .~ a 8~i 9
~. ~' xsssasssaaR x s a xxa. x a 8 a
~~j2X~ ~! 88888888888 R S R <a8i % 8! -
~=.. ~' ~?ft $~A,££aRa ~ x a ages a - - a
°~, ~ ~ _______ ___ ^ _ x
~ s° -e.^.R3^e3EB.~, a veee e e
a a 3
3.s -a [axa 5~ ~g =es~ sa a= ~
kxflw Vwx'w.::: a Y~ ~m ~nk~ Y ~~ gx ;
_ ~^ 4 V '3 a w ~ ~'
a C ~ ~ S ^ Y ~ ~ a ~, ~'
17
.~
h_
P€
ea';
s
~~'
s
u~'
si I
gl
~'
~
~
~ae .
v
W '.
Ner. ~
'
:~c = _ g
'uY
.. n
~
V
L C
42 R
x k ~
A ~~ y
[y ~%
/~
R fi%
~ 88
a 88 8 ~ 8%
t5 j'' .~ ~ $s s aR
_
_ ~d
_ _ S P ~ ~ _ A
A
W }A 8Se% R ~% ~3y8 ~I y
^LZA .~. {
y
I y
y
!!
_
S Ye _ Yj YS Y Yd-J V Y
Y6 ',, .y" Y Y '~' Y f
s s e
~s: _ $ $
~
gaga ~
FY~
' >q':6C6
~.... '
~~
' -~-ad==
q~~ .
~ ssRZ~~
~~E
~ __ sR
ra f R
xa r
~
c'i
._. Y
€e
~.
->:AL
~
F ~ '
YYYi
¢¢
l
_ ^Z~&S.A~ i ~k
Y
YI ~
[
~
~
M S Y
_ Y _ Ya ~
.. ~ y
~
~ s
"
ga$
§$~
s
~~Y
~. y. _
~~A
~~y
~~Kg ~ E
_= ~ S
R Y
d V
~~t a' Y
~' ~
~ ~
l 1
R
s
s
Y
Y
M
S
i y
COPY....p_._._~.
ACT ~ 4 RECD
AiRIC11IlOM /a~ AIO~MpnC »~~w ~ 1. muss a urBUFCSI NL[ ra.
r« AMIp[N d AbeMYe UINpp Cw«pl
IWI ~O°~w YwHS
r
an aw r0 • t>0 M(!«[ rq,
.
slnppnp, wr, vs.n
~.N....~.-. ~..,..,
c~ to
z NANdS(a AIIIKANI(31 rNM. prpir
sAnu. e..s. Agitl pldr Lc !q4
er..lln odw r_rss
rn«... oa.,
s. muss a nANSACnowsl rw uc
mt
sd[ s sw.w z~
Aron ss.oa
4 Vl1LM IWl IYSt
S. l«pbp d Rrynw-IMM «M Lrwl
t]r~ ~I~mrL wrt Irr
rpr sn» r sr.u+sr ~ ruru Iv.oo
A M h[w«I Irzpplpd, ). An hNwNa lnlid[ ~
Slp~rrppd NUnM ~ Ciry l~nrM
A A1dNq Adbpv f1611mn1 hep SI-[AIl.bpr Nd Spwl ~ I Ir..i
/~ IR«. Iw
0. N..p pu ppr pN~ appwlM d e Ipi[^rr l0. Nelp 1w npr liol[Ipd pm d M[ prwi:wn d IM AkpFeSe
~ Mwq[ CadM M N d IM Dlpempwr pn
I I. [ylalll O "\[a" pawl p wpll N 1 V an «r olp{MIMI w~[p Yp114 N«N[ p«1 M XFM appMVlFn.
It, Apylwml 7p[[ (pl Mr1 an/ ««+/N pald[Y[J h w~W FlNnpd Pppl~l[I .i1 Mp p[ «p pw4M1[pliw d e Funlpp, aM
AI IMI Ap .pl wl.bblp w apul[ a p[l~N p by IiMMN ppY d IM Nplpppl d IM AImAeFI 4'[IVY[ Ca«pl AN.
U. 3rAn W [AIkGRQA Cwmry d....._._ .~!~!!V!______ __________OpN_..._ ___.._~]}5~~......
u.r r+. ~ N~pn N« +~• ~...p. .. .~ n. .r.~
r ~~ ^w.. p.wl ..I~w.~..M...~ .~, M. ..[. ,~. ..w.....
•wi. ~f~p~ ~ IwNd Iiwl~ x .nnh ti
n w~n/+I w `r ..aH ra +.M wp.~u..~w ~. I..l...e w .hNaw ,
M•~I ~ w nM~ ! I.w.M~: III •.n ,Y IwMw .Mrn.w0.~ r ~.r. ~Ir w~Y~ ~w ...e..+. w, ,n..r ..x s ~..i n I~M.In w
w p~~
1I. AIM1ICAM ~'/~~A /p/~ ~ A
SIGN NHE .,_ ...'L'~j1-..Ll4w..l~ ........... ........................................._...___..__.__.
Dp Nd wdN MW r7lY Gv( Fw D[AIIpITI Uw ony
^ IiAY{iplr 0[Ya^~
^ .___ ..............__..__._...,__._..,_.....__conn runro _.....__..._......_.._....__....._.._..
.....,
^ Mw.dl Ipp M__.._..__.Jd1 M _..._...._.._ ............... G~II[ w....___...... _,Itp[pl/I Nn ..__.__..._____....
.r .Il llw `° ~
V
uniation ~r nunmo~
u. sren a uuwmlA cpNpr d ....................________....__ow....__...._..__._._____._
I.....r+ .~....A .. ............+.. .. .... a «
r ~~w.-• ...r..r.. .-.r. r..w .. mil ... ~ +.w .r
Ipp W. w n n.../w . N h .N~.
A ~!. wIw ~~ ~L M ti y.~~ Ns
n~ «n w+rpw /. Y pn.l.n. ~
n d.r~ Ir ~•• M nw/.~. n .rvM. M ~~.. II ww ti rv~L ~~~ ~~ w ~K~. N• y II.
wlrw . M~ ~ ~w ~ i+.li1 IM#rl ti 0.~~n~
s
e~
i.
\
~I
i
\oi'c c~:.\edu ~uo
Fv~:~ Irv
N 2 N O A J S
£ m O O O -t d N ~-+
an d ~ T J o J ~+r
~~~ nR s~ ~ m cocrai
~~~~ 31-3?3 -e ~ c na
/ ~ m m d~ C1 (1 O
/'.' l'~ a~ nso. n s 3 ~, .~.
~• ~.~ "~ 3 N 3 A~ G N O w 3
1 / ~/ \1, ~ JV' m N r1 d d A
~ m ` ~ ~ ~ N nla rT 'C 9C ~
~ 'f m
\ ~ b n~ S v N P r
(ADNJ~N O ~ lOJ
j; ~ \` j ~nw v m r.~m
e . 6 ... 3 ~. N O. y
~\ \~ 6 (C J 6 T W
~' 1 fGJ N(U y l0
,f1 1 Ort .PO
.~i 1 U1 ~ i ~ a~ ~ ~ o a .°•
I -~ \~~ } AAO~ w
_ m ,vI~ ~
L \ O N Cb
LL ~"*~ N C h D A
1 °ca ~ i
~~
1 D 2
~ ~\ ~~ 'I~ 1 CCGC 1 N
~~) y \ \ rr
P ~ ,.I -.
_ f. ~, o w
71 c
• ~.~..
~~ r r ~ ' t
\. 7 ~• j o.
1- ~-
0
~- ~_~ ~
^ .. .~..
rilk~ p~
Fop (;apy'
t'
b
~'v
COPY__.. .~.t..l~........_...a..w4
r _
4f< .. a . .
~><. \..iy.WV
OCZ U 4 NEC'C
4,
,....
4yy31{111gN y0t AYCOIIOIK MMS 1f~41 1. lYIry3) Of IICFNEF(51 fllF NO,
f« DprMrw d AkdM'r Sn«Y fawd
tPol e^^f'c^I 4111t4td4
OtY 3I3E aEm c AllT FFCfl11 wD,
95kt5]1
Sevanwb, CaM, y3413
,.......o.... ~......: ~~~~
GOOF 3615
I1. wAwNnre A«MI aOPGU fev
f dtlviMdre bb.e flab
lauad
t. NAwfIS/ W AAIIK.WS(N IDC 1b91 TYay ~'"'"
:L E1L14, 1314n1o[y ~. ApMtd ana.. Sac Sf WA ,p
F4w4n Dw« ]-1-91
f4r<Rrr Doh:
2AIIDtm, aill 6. 1. IvIry51 Of iRANSAlTOW31 /B
\Rf f !%1.00 Xl
Btt2Y1t. -... _ 33.t.C
LT 1U ~ '
4 Ne:w d faiiw 16'
!. lwaiw M Ydnro-Narh« oM Syan
Eo631 LAru1 50.
3u. tl
r
GIY aM Yp CW Cwwf
Narrlu OYYmIp 91]01.... 10iA1 f 133.5•
6 II yramiw, IwrwN, nn rrrrnn.. ao. YS
Sb. ivw d Liwnr - Gry l~min>
S. Ma11wp Adlm (.l d4.nn1 flan St-NwArr aM flrwl r^r''r•'1
y~ (t[u_
9. Nwa yw nar Sttn aw•ialad d a Ido^Srl 10. Maw Y^• rear robM wY d IM po~Naw d dr Akde&
Arwmya co:wal M w .pubRew el Iln Dparmwnl pr.
lar:i:q b Xn Aai
11. [rqun a "123" wmr w Hann y w 10 en w wlwl.nrw wAi[A JWI M 3la.:N aan d Mn applwafw.
IZ, Aaplkaw ofran lal ww o:ry :awwp. «nplgN .n on..alr IiwnaA pr:Nw, ..ill Mw ell :Ae awlM<aHwl d a Ikmur, oM
ry) IMI M .AI wl nd_oN a caaw w yweD w 4 vwlwN w d Mw panuem d da AlcoM1dic Iwwaya CwMI Acf _
IliV¢elda 9-LS ]5-91
IS. SLATE Of UDfGfMA Cwnry d .......... ...........................Dow.........................
~~~ w
~.rr~~.r ~ n.ISw M rvw.M ]:.`r w r+~dn •r~r ..n~~ ~...mn.n~1. ~~a^+ :+..~ x a, i~..-.x . r ., m~ .r wu,r
IA Afyll<Altt m ~I
SIGN Nfllf .................................._.....-. ....__._.. _.....y~.r.. ~.:. ........___.
~munna4 n nuHSre~o~
IS. SltlF Ot U1110FN1A cwnry d ...................................... Doe
M`M ....w~ N~':.~r
.aar: «.~..~ ..~.n ,~..: n ,wu... N ems.-.~..
Fanrwl: M d..........laN a....
fM NW :lr4e plan iF4 Lbw; Fw [Npwnew Uw f)nly
AnalAd: ^ SwwAtA wMC« +ti- 4
-i few+wY warn,
^ .................................................._cones NAIIfD ._._....................................._
6
w
J >
6 ro
x
r ~
~i o
W E
2 J
tJ
i
6
m
W
y
m
N O~
1p
N O~
~ O
0 0
N N
Z ~
6 N
6 E
ro
u
Ev
E
O
U
a
O
O
t
L
O
a
L
P
~aa
z
a
C
N
T
e
v
H
W
O
d
6
U
v
0
E
V
U
U
N
W N
~ .~
u
Y ~4- W
L ro0 E
v.~~
O.Y~Or~
O C /O U ro
L N •~ '
6a Y O Y
r- C O c
++ h N O N
N~~ i~
ro»r~
~.~ rn
roa 3 ~ 3
N O U1 O
W £ J Z J
O
C C c ~~ ~~
Y Y Y N
C L J N VI
O O O N U1
N2v~W3
r
'' .~3
-------- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONCA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Pseiat ant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: OO88IDSIFATIOR Oi RB60LOTIOM D8C[ARIMO T~ RBSOLTS OF THB
BLHCTIOA tOR CPD 88-2 A8NS2ATIDA AO" 1
e~ ,?." -
~•.. ,
".
It is recommended the City council adopt the attached reaoluCion which will, in
accordance with State law, declsre the results of a "Mello Roos Community
Facil ltiee Act of 1982" special tax election which woe held on October 9, 1993.
sAC7ccROURD
Pursuant to contlitiona placed upon tAe developers of the property to the
annexation area, the davelopsre have been processing through the City the
necessary documents t0 annex to the CPD 88-2 (Law Enforcement).
Per prior Council action, all necessary requirements to meet State law have barn
met with the election being duly authosi zed by the City Council at its regular
meeting held October 2, 1991.
After counting the ballots on this election, the City Clerk, acting as the
election official, hoe certified that the measure voted upon did receive Che
favorable two-thirds vote as required by law and, in fact, received a 1D0%
unanimous vote in favor of the measure.
If the Ctty Council adopts the attached reeolut ion tonight, they will be
cext ify ing these results.
fteapectfully submitted,
~~ ~ >
Duane A. esker
Assistant to the Clty Manager
DAB/tlr
DAB:976
Attachment
RF9JI1/1'ION NO. 91-**~-~
A RESOIUTION OF TfH': CTI'Y N[AJCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCFIO
CUCAMCNC'A, CALtFCHd77A, DD3ARDi0 THE RESOLTS OF A "G¢I.T,((t-
Ia70.S OCMM84ITY F7ICIISTIES ACf OF 1982" SPDCIAL TAX
EIFXTION
WHEREAS, the City Caaicil of the City of Ranc3w (hereinr
after referred to as the "legislative body of the local Pgerxy"), has
previously declared its intmtim and held arcl oor~duc:ted pcnoaedings relating
to the anrwomtim of territory to an existug 0.~mity Facilities District
pua:ant to the terms and pmvisions of the 'Tfello-ldoos Wrmmity Facilities
Act of 1982", bei=g Qiapter 2.5, Part 1, Divisim 2, Title 5 of the Gotcx7unent
GUde of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. ~
existing annwiity Facilities District has been desicyiated as CQ49.NITY
FACILI7TES DISTRICT NO. 86-2 (herei~fter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known an3 designated as
COM9NNTI'Y FACILITTFS DISIRICF N0. 88-2, ANNF]CATION NO. 1 (hereirusrer refesxed
to as the ^annexed territory"); and
WHEREAS, said legislative body did call for and order to be held an
electim to supnit to the qualified voters of the anrexed territory a
propositim to levy a special tax in the annexed territory; and
WHEREAS, at this time said electim has been held and the meastse
voted upm did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, arcl
this legislative body does desire to declare the favorable results of the
electim in aavrdanoe With the authoriutim of Sectim 22932 of the
Elections Code of the State of California.
NOW, TFD32FT•IIRE, the City Cnu~cil of the City of Ranx3w Qx:amorga does
hereby resolve as follogs:
SECTION 1: that the above recitals are all true and correct,
SECMON 2: That this legislative body hereby receives and approves
the CFFQTFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAI, AND SPATFb¢M` OF VCPES CASE, as sulmitted
by the City Clerk, as Electim Official, said Statenent setting foreA the
number of votes cast in the electim, the measure voted upm, and the ntanlx~r
of votes given for arcl/or against the measure voted upon, A copy of said
Certificate and Statement is attadird hereto, marked Exhibit ^A", referenced
and so inwrporated.
SEY'I'ION 3: That the City Clerk is hereby direcked to enter in the
minutes of this meetvg the resulffi of the electim and the StATEtgNI' OF VOTES
CAST'.
~~
CAATIPICATH OP HLECTION OPPICIAL
AND STATBNENT OP VOTES CAST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO ) ee.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, ELECTION OFPICIAL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COVNTY OF SAN
AERNARDIND, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions
of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section
17000 of the Eleciione Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of
the votes teat at the
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 8A-2
ANNEAATI ON NO. 1
SPECIAL MAILED BALLOT ELECTION
in said City, held October 9, 1991.
I FURTHER CERTIFY the[ this Statement of Votes Ceet shows the whole number of votee
cast in said District in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for the
Measure in Enid Dlet rlct in eaitl City, end the totals of the respective columns and
the totals ae shown for the Measure are fully true and correct.
TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST:
II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES POR ]AS
ANO AGAINST PROPOSITION At FOR
AGAINST O
NITNESS my hand and Offic lal Seal this 10Lh day of October , 1991.
.R/Yl+e
EL CTION OPFI L
CITY OF RANCN CUCAMONGA
STATE OP CALIPORNIA
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
~'
DATE: OctobeY 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Oan Coleman, Principal Planner
SDHJRCT: TRAILS L~LOmI'TATI01 PLAS - A rnmprehenaive
implementation strategy for hiking, riding, and biking
trails within the community.
RBOOIR®ATIOt: Staff recommends that the Ciiy Council approve the
Trails Implementation Plan, as revised, through adoption aE the attached
Resolution.
BaCRGRDOND: On September a, 1991, the City Council reviewed the Trails
Implementation Plan and requested certain revisions. The Council
recognized that Che City has a significant investment in the trail
system in the form of over 100 miles of existing Regional, Community,
and Local Trails. The importance of developing the trail System, in
particular bicycle trails, was strea9ed as an alternative tranaportaiion
system.
The Council requested three primary changes: 1) reflect the City
Council's "pay ae you go" phi loeophy, 2) indicate that implementation
will be accomplished over the long-term, and 3) emphasize completion of
the trail system as development occurs. These changes have been made to
the Trails Implementation Plan and are reflected in the attached
Resolution.
Res lly a tt
Hra 11 r
Cit Planner
BB:DC:is
Attachments: Revised pa gee of the Trails implementation Plan
Reaolutian
INTRODUCTION
"Opporlunitin eziat within Rarrkho Cucamonga for ffte provision of hails for hansportation and recreation
usage. Haneback ridurb kiking,jogginy running, walkingand 6iryciingcan a116e accommodated in some way
within Rancho Cucamonga.
Ow of the saordary benefits of tkr many flood ronhal ckarw4 facing tbwgk the City is the availability of
ngkt-of--way for hail purpose. 77rae rigknrof-wry were oncepart of the San Bernardiw County Reweahowl
Plan, providing for mr/fi-wage: ie. bfrycln, aiking aril egmlrian.
!n northern Alta Loma rssidenlial dewlopmsnt has provided for egwshian use. However, there were no
coruiattnf design stanLr4 employed resalforg in iaadegaate hail rys4ms, trd a fragmented collection of
easemenh witka oariow huidmelopments; rite majorftyaf wMck lack standard trailmidtlu, uniform design,
and dmelopmtnt. Many trails empty info t/K shat oI deadend at walb, fawn, ravines, or flood conhol
channels.
The Trails Plon deals uritk two areas; the awlution ofeaistinahail problem aaoa wit4in dsvsloped midential
areas; and a rowutent policy for a Hero hai! system for new dealopment where appropriate."
Generil flan, p. IR•61, 62
1.1 PURPOSE
Thin Trailslmpkmenbtion Ran iaasbtementof the City'along•term cwamdmttmtbcompletingafnil system.
The flan serves to idenhfy trail policies affectlng the entire community and b inwre implementation of a trail
system in a manner consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. [t is intended to provide specific
implementation strategies from initul panning ttvough construction and matntenanrn. lsmp4uon of the
entve trail system may take decade, and thbdoetmrent b intended b guide pterent std fuure generatloru is
thin effort
The purpose of the Trolls Impkmentatlon Plan ra
] To research and amlyze existing toil condidoru, problems and opportunities.
] To develop a strare®. b illevute trail defidendea and problems.
] To develop prelitnirury cost esanute for/uture trail acquisition, corbtruction, and rehabiliution.
] To identify funding medunisna for trail xquisihon, developmmq rehabiliblion, and nainhnance.
] To define the future role of v+trbua City depattmenb in the implentenbtion of a trail system.
The Trails Impkmenbtlirt plbt showy not be viewed +s the flnl statement of the dfy'a vfabn. With time. in
poFWatlon v.il change, ibgala will be redefined, and the physical environment in which residenb work and
rtcreate will be iltered. The I'lanrtgtresenba wmmary o(theCitybhope forthe future to enblfsh a tail system.
In this sense, the Trails Implmrnbfion Pbn shout' becotasidaad a'yvytg dobteaeaY tltal may be petiodiolly
reviled b reapoM b and td4ct durtgbg mMltlont
1.2 BENEFITS OF A TRAIL SYSTEM
The development of public parks and rets4ational facilities was identified as ore of the most imporhm needs m
the community by the atlum who participated in developing the CiNs first General Plan. The implemenuoon
of a trails system provides sigrufiant direct and indirect benefits to Rancho Cucamonga as a whole, and to i rai I
a8'
7.5.2 Community Trails: The Commumty Trals must be shown on the final tract map and on seperate public
improvement plate W the safisfaction of the City Engnneer. The Engmeenng Division has the pnmarv role ei
rtteiving and distnbufing plans (or review by Planning. The Planning Division is Supportive in providing
infomutlon regarding trail alignment design standards, barren, landscaping and signing.
Z5.3 Regional Tralla: The Engineering Division has the prindpal role in preparing trailimprovemen[plans for
retrofiting trans along Flood cgntrof and utility Comdon. Engineering also has primary responsibility for
reviewing trml plans proposed by other public and private agencies. The Planning Division provides azsstance
regarding design standards, tamers, gates, IarWscaping and signing.
7.6 CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION
7.6.1 Local Feeder Trails: Tfuse mils are insb0ed by the developer. The Budding and Safety Division inspects
[.Deal Feeder Trails for mnformarrtt with the approved grading Puns. The Plaruring Division inspects [.Deal
Feeder Tails for mNomunce with approved aRgnnrmb, fencng, and provides assistance, particularly to
resolve field dunges and W clarify design standards.
7.63 Community Trait: in undeveloped arcs, the developer irobl4s the trails u part of the public improve-
menu Where CommunityTrailsan being retrofitted into odsting neighborhoods, the trails areconstructed by
City mntrxtonaspanof UreCapibl Improvement I'rogramauthorized by theCityCounril. Minor trail projects
and trail regain may be mrutrrrned bYCity Mainterunce Dppartrrrent news. The Engineering Division has the
primary fesponsibiEty (or inspecting Community Trails to arouse mnfornaarrc! with Dottie improvement plans
as approved by the City Enguteer. Tire Planning Division provides inforrtsatlon and assbtarue N matters of
design standards and naolving field ctunges.
7.63 Reglonal'haib: The City will irobll all ora part of the trait abng the flood control clunneb. The City's
Engineering Divisioncoordirotea contracts fwthe irobllation of tail improvemmb. The Engineering Division
overseas tare inspection o(Regional Trait being irtstallad under City tonfract with assistance from the Planning
Division as needed.
7.7 MAINTENANCE
7.7.1 rod Feeder taus: Tleaty hu, and will cgntlnue tolrva Otdittaricea rtsgWrtrra proper rnainterunce of
faxalFeedaTnW fwtbvsafnyud futsctlortaW~. ThepmpertyownermainhW his aectionof the private local
FeederTnil easement N some irotarw.ea, mainterrarrtt is the responsibilityof a Homeqwnen Assodadonas may
be esublished in the wbdiwbn deed restrictioro. N addition, the City presently mntrarn with the Weed
Abatement Division of the Cowry AgriculmN DrpsMtmt for weed abatmrent services A remmmetded
Dldhtattce b indudtd In the Apprtndia utal srWld eslabliah nteae detautlR tr'aY 6YfatletatKe sWdards
7,73 Commudlyrnlb: Englnering'a Mainterurce Depsrbmmthas theprtndpalrokinmainbiningthepoblic
Community TrailSystem, includbrgon-strcetbiryck trails. In mast irtstanoes, a lJrrdxape Maintenanre Diuri<t
has been formed br the purpose of generating funding and rrrirrterrarrce of trails,
7,73 Regional Tni4; Englrreenngb Maintenance Department typira0y maintairb Regiorul Trails under the
tertrtsof thepintagnenrenbsvitheheCounty FloodControl Dbtrictand other public or privateutilitycompsrues.
7.7.a Hiking and Rlding Trail Matntenurn SbndaMa: The foibwing minimum standards shall apply:
A. Iropat toils, bridges, fencing, pies, vehicle barrier, lightlng and aigruat regularinterval for safety harards,
damage, or other needed msiritararrce or repaus.
B. Continuously mainbin proper grade and suefadng o(all trait, inclyding,but not limited b, removal of loose
rock in eacess of 1" diameeer, filling pot holes, and refilling with new surfadng makrial to required depth, as
needed.
~9 ~
IMPLEMENTATION
"!fiat the area fhown in tht FquesMan/Rursl derignated ores provided far
- The keeping andprotection of onimala on privak properly, including equine, bovine, cltJt-hoofed animals,
and poultry.
-Regain that aR dtortopmentwithin tlu arcs rclakto esiatingand futon orcoa ottupied by egeiu, bovine,
left-hoofed anima/a, and poultry by providing hail eomrevtiona through eoaemenh in ordn to connect
disconnected hails and for needed accesf to rrcnation activitin.
- That atl hail earemmf fM116r maintained through an active program of weed abatement to a neat and
ordtrly mamrer on all devebpmenb.
The City shalt fsrilita4 flu dmrlopment of a Regions/ Multi-Porpou 7rai15yatrm as shown on Figure /II-T.
Allugmenb of thrRrgionalMulti-PurpouTrsil Syatem,f/sallbravailabkJoruuas equtfMan,ptdnfnanand
In'ke trails whtrc frafibk.
The City shall ntablish an agnemrnt with San Btrnardino County for Hu uu and maintewnce of the flood
control righh-af•way for the hails.
Tlu City shall ntobliah an agreement with public and privak .lititits Joe the uu and maintenance of utility
corridors and righb-of--way Joe the haib.
71u City that! considn aerogram for the maintrnancp and when necessary, construction and rehabilitation, of
Community Trails,"
- GmrnJ Plan, p. fR4i
8.1 REGULATORY PROCEDURES
The City exerdsea ib potioe powerauthoritytoenwre trot subdivision rtupsand otherdeveloprnent projects are
consistent with the Gereral Non's Master Plan of Tmits and related trail policies. The City's Development Code
require Wt all subdivisions within rive Equestrian/Rural Overlay District provide Regional and Community
Trails in accordance with the Masts Plan o/ Trails, and provide Loa! Faader trail access w the rear of each lot.
Further, the Code requires Uuteven roe-residential projects provide trail aserrenb where it is determined that
such trail comrections ate nlcesesry. Refer b the City'f Development Code for an expWtution of the review
P~~•
8.2 SOURCES OF FUNDING
CommoNy, the most difficult aspect of implementingaplan is the acquisition of adequate funding. Funds and
community support for the required funding nurses are an essential component of any successful program.
Sumtnarirxd below are someof thecvrrentand potential trrethodsof titurrcing !nil improvemenb. The purpose
of this aeettatt b b Bat all paeuW hO~"6 eouean; however, sooe ory tntbe mnsideed as visbk fuundng
bob u tweed heMn and b flee Tn7t Ftrrrttbtg PYn b the Appedla. Tie pteserte tllyCaundl does rot support
the use d reeve asst®reree a fats b Bence trW~ 7lredase, Bra Noe pltm yata etnphsels on cornpletlng
the trail systmt u drvelopetett save std uslrrg other revenue sostrces, strait u grand.
g21 Tao Base: Some support for trail acquisition, development, and maintenancecomes from lheCity~s General
Fund. Unfortunately, RarchoCunmonga isorte of three"zero tax Gse"cities in the SbteofCalifomiaasa result
~0 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 9/. tl. lD ~..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Ttte CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING THE TRAILS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan established a Master Plan of Trails
for a network of hiking, biking, and horse riding trails ae a recreational
element; and
WHEREAS, the City'g General Plan policies call for programs to
improve existing trails to make the trails safer, more functional, and
accessible and to foci lltate development of Regional Multi-Purpose Trail and
Community Trai le syatemJ and
WHEREAS, Ne Trails Implementation Plan Ss consistent with the goals
and policies of the City's General Plan regarding trailer and
WHEREAS, the Trails Advisory Committee has reviewed and recoamended
approval of the Trails Imp lementaGion Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Comorisaion hew reco®ended to Ghe City Council
approval of the Trails Implementation Plan.
SECTION 1; It is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City
COUncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an investment in
the tral le system of over $10.3 million es
evidenced by over 100 miles of existing Regional,
Co®unlty and Local Peeler Trailai artd,
2. The trail system is deaf gned as a multi-purpose
system that benefits many users, including,
pedestrians, hikers, riders, and bicycliatsr and,
3. The trai le system, patticulerly the bicycle trail
system, provides an important mesas of non-
vahdce~lae transportation which reduces traffic,
noise, anfl pollution; and
4. The implementation strategy contained in the Trails
Lmplementation Plan repreaent9 a long-term plan
that will be accomplished over many generations to
come; and,
5. The trail system should be implemented, whenever
possible, through the plenning rev lea process ae
development occurs.
31
CITY COUNCIL REHOLUT ION N0.
TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
OCt obey 16, 1991
Page 2
SECTION 2: H_ it further resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, that their policy is to use grants or other Crail funding
sources, rather than new assessments or impact fees.
SECTION 3: Be it fuY they resolved that the Trails Implementation
Plan is hereby approved.
3~
c1'1'V UN' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jce Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY FORA PORTION OF 25TH
STREET, LOCATED NEST OF ETINANDA AVENUE (APN: 225-082-01)
RECONENDATIOM
It is recommended City Council adopt the attached resolution declaring a
portion of 25th Street as surplus property and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign said Resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On July 12, 1989, Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 14139 which Ts
a residential subdivision of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land
located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street. One of
the conditions of Tentative Tract 14139 1s to vacate the south half of 25th
Street which is adtacent to the northerly property line of the protect site.
On September 19, 1991, City Council ordered the vacation of said portion of
25th Street. Since 25th Street is owned in fee ti tie by the City, and the
vacation has occurred, the City needs to dispose of the excess property.
Through these proceedings Ahmanson Developments, Incorporated, will obtain the
southerly 10 feet of the vacated street and use the land as part of the lots
for Tract 14139, the northerly 20 feet will be used for a storms drain
fac it lty.
The Disposition of the property is 1n conformity with the adopted City General
Plan and draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
-.~~ ~ ~~
Nm. Joe O'Ne1~--~
City Engineer
NJO:JS:dlw
Attachment
2
RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~ 9.J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI NO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO E%ECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY
OF NHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS E%HIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE
THE SAME TO BE DELIYERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in those
certain parcels of real property generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and
hereinafter referred to 1n this Resolution as "said property." A full, true
and complete description of said property is set forth 1n that copy of deed
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference set forth herein.
(i1) California Government Code SectTOn 37350 provides as follows:
"A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and en,~oy real and
personal property, and control and dispose of it for the common benefit."
(tit) California Government Code Section 37351 provides 1n
pertinent part, as follows:
The legislative bogy (City Council) may... dispose of, and convey
such property for the benefit of the City...."
(1v) The Planning Conanlssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
heretofore made the findings on August 14, 1991, that disposing of said
property, as herein contemplated, would be in confonaity with the General Plan
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(v) Said property was acquired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1n
fee, for street and highway purposes the need for which has been superseded by
the development of Tract No. 14139,
(v1) By Resolution No. 91-246 this City Council vacated and
abandoned the puD11c street and road easements overlaying said property.
(v11) Satd property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and is no longer necessary or convenient for the purposes for which
it was acquired.
3~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
25TH ST.
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 2
(viii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said
property and benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity
to maintain said property.
(ix) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOH THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. All facts stated Tn the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution
hereby are found to be true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds that the quit claiming of said
property to the persons described in said deed wi11 benefit the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed
to execute the deed, a fu11, true and correct copy of which 1s attached hereto
as Exhibit "A", and cause the same Lo be recorded forthwith upon adoption of
this Resolution
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
35
RECOaano ReoutastEO er
r
M~
IYwI
•Y~r
AY•
"" L
ulorasa ssrnew! rul ro
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Boz 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
rr. ru msnrarna To
I eFACE ABOVE TNM LINE FtM RECORaER'a atE
[1000YORAIIY TRARN~I TA%a
_COYNMRlOON FAIL YALOl WFIIOFlaT1'eO11YaTtD.
,OA f:OMFYtIa ON FYLL YAIW Llaa IIOIa ANO
lMCOYaaaaefa RlYAa11Na AT Tal! OF MLL
i/rYw M DwI~wY a MM~InM! YII Fa. NI,ti
~ Corporation Quitclaim Deed
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California
hcreby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to
AHMANSON DEYELOPMENTSr INC•
the following described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino, State of California:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" and "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR AlD41NSON DEVELOPMENT.
VACATION Op THE SOUTH ]0' OF 35TH STREET.
E%HIBIT "A^
BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/{ OF SECTION 30, TORNSHIP
1 NORTH, RANGE fi NEST, SAN BERNAROINO NERI DIAN, ACCORDING 1'O
GIFICZAL PGT OP SAID LAND APPROVED BY TN6 SURVEYOR GENERAL
DATED NOVENBEA 17, 1983, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAAOINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID PORTION
BEING MORE PARTICVIJWLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLONS;
BEGINNING AT THE EAST 1/{ CORNER OP 9AID SECTION 10, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING IN THE CENTERLINE OF 25TH STREET!
THENCE, ALONG TNL EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 9ECTION 30.
SOUTH 00.00.22" NEST, 70.00 FEET TO THE 90VTHLRLY LINE OF A
l0-POOT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OP $AN
BERNARDINO A9 RECORDED IN BOOR 31{], PAGE 586 OP OFFICIAL
RECORDS OP SAID COUNTY;
THENCE, ALONG RAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89.26.31^ NEST,
1165.97 FEET TO THE $OUTHEASTEALY LINB OP A TRACY Op LANG
GRANTED TO SOUTHERN SURPLUS REALTY CO. A8 RCCORDBD IN BOOK
816], PACE 17 OP 9AI0 OPPICIAL RECORDS:
THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTNEABTLALY LINE, NORTH N•{Ir01" EAST,
I1.B1 PLET TO SAID CENTERLINE Of 2STN STREET AND TH6
NORTNHRLY LING OP SAID SOUTHEAST 1/I, 6ECTI0N 20r
THENCE, ALONG SAZD CLNTERLINCr SOUTH B9'26r31" CAST, 111 S.B3
FEET TD THE POINT OP BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.79 ACRCSr MORE OR LL99.
ALL AB NoRL PARTICULARLY 9N0MN ON EEHIBIT "B" ATTACHED
HERETO AND HEPEBY NADL A PART HEREOF.
.y,.'(01AeL ~.A
J 'R ~,T
r
R. ]u~
APRIL 38, 1989 ~?Op CN*~
10{72.00
(A2J1-00]-06)
L(~ J 1
MARIE' , . L.S. 5311
3957-CMV-10{72,00-B
~XHIBIT "B
BEING A PORTION OF THE 60UiHEA57 I/d OF SECTION 20.
70VNSHIP I .40RTH. RANGE 6 VE61. SAN BERNAROINO nERIOIAN.
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGO. COUNTY OF SAN BFRNAROINO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
VACATION OF THE SOUTH 30' OF 25lb STREET
IiI
OS~
'N O 2D' R/Y ftlR ROAD L
6 / u9UC UTILITIES PEfl
/oJ6f, I I Of FILIAL PLAt OF FL.O.
i~
U.! I II
w ~20'
acALE~ I' ~ 200'
L I
N I
]o' R/Y t0 LOVMiR I n
Of SAM 9ERNARDINO I
PER O.R. xIN]/]aa. w
~a _ I
S~-~ I.~
2~ _' I
~~G
I
0.79 AC. I
I
]o.
yA.~~~
v`d~
9
f ~~
~s,
?ar tw
2edo.]r
s oo•ao•u• Y +xeo.ar
II VN'OA' E
.I .BJ'
\~A
~`~ 2~
~iLG
E'l1 LIME SE L. M
zaAn.]v +I
P.0.8.
E i/1 COR.
'•C. 20
N
N
to r~ //
' ~ / ~ ~ i
20
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
~ k
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members cf the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assocta to Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT N0. 14139
JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WITH
AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS AND WATT 1NALD EMPIRE, INCORPORATED, FOR
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14139, 14379 ANO 14380,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT
NOS. 14139 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 25TH STREET AND
ETIWRNDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY AHMVINSON DEVELOPMENTS
RECOMlEMDATIpI
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Tract No. 14139, accepting the subject agreements and securities and
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign said agreements and cause said maps to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract Nos. 14139 is located on the southwest corner of 25th Street and
Etiwanda Avenue Tn the Low Density Residential District. The Tentative Map
consisting of 119 stogie family lots on 54 acres acres of land was approved by
Planning Commission on Juty 12, 1989.
The Developer, Ahmanson Developments is submitting an agreements and
securities to guarantee the construction of their public on-site improvements
in the following amounts.
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LABOR AND MATERIAL
BOND BOND
On-site Street improvements f1,300,00 ; 650,000
On-site Stonn Drain 903,000 451,500
Construction and Removal of 216,000 108,000
Temporary 8a sin
Landscape 402,000 201,000
(2,821,000 ;1,410,500
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TR 14139 - AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 2
Ahmanson Developments is also submitting a Joint Improvement Agreement and
Securities with Matt Inland Empire, Incorporated. Natt is developing
Tentative Tract 13527. ' This site 1s directly south of Tentative Tract 14139
and is conditioned to due many of the same off-site public improvements. The
securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site public improvements
are as follows:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND
Etiwanda Avenue. North S 341,000
of 24th St.
Etiwanda Ave. Storm Drain 358,000
24th St. AdJacent to TR 14379 350,000
24th St. Ad,~acent to TR 14380 458,000
24th St.Storm Drain - Debr15 2,040,000
Basin to Spreading Grounds
Channel "H" 8 Debris Basin 878,000
CCND Access over Channel "H" 54,000
Channel "H" Ad,~acent to TR 14139 646,000
Northerly Channel XIY-8 576,000
Etiwanda Ave. Street Improvement 214,000
Summit Ave. to 24th St.
Interim Basin and Outlet to 731.000
Spreading Grounds
56,652,000
LABOR AND MATERIAL
80ND
f 113,500
179,000
175,000
229,000
1,020,000
439,000
27,000
323,000
288,000
107,000
365,500
53,326,000
Copies of the agreements and securities are available /n the City Clerk's
office.
A Pre-Condemnation Agreement for acqu151tton of right-of-way to construct the
24th Street Storm Drain and interim detention basin within the Etiwanda
Spreading Grounds from San Bernardino County Fl ood Control District and San
Bernardino County and an agreement to guarantee the design and construction of
the interim detention basin within the spreading grounds will be submitted for
aDDroval with a separate staff report.
Respectfully subml}J<ed,
J~G~JGec-
Nm, Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:LEH;dIw
Attachment
~~
RESOLUTION N0. gJ'~9G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR04ING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT,
SMPR04EMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT AND
SECURITIES AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 14139
NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 14139, consisting of 119
lots, submitted by Ahmanson Developments, Subdivider, located on the south
side of 25th Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue, 1n the Low Density Residential
District has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dy said Subdivider
and approved by said Ctty as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State
of California, and 1n compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of
said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said
City, together with good and sufficient improvement Security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets
delineated thereon.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor 15 authorized to execute same
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and
content thereof Dy the City Attorney; and
That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
!/
RESOLUTION N0. g~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
GERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.
7 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 7
FOR TRACT N0. 14139
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance D15trict No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance Dtstrlct; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance D15tr1ct have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the property as Shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance Dtstrlct.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including tie Tevy of all assessnx!nts, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
T~
EIIHIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAPE: TRACT N0. 14139
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lamps to be Annexed
District No. 5800--95 ~_ ~~Qi~1T3~ OtT
1
7
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Community Turf Ground Cover Trees
District No. Street Name Eguest.Trail Sg• ft• Sg. ft. Ea.
7
~3
G11 Y VC 1SH1VUAiV l,'UUAMVNI:A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mavor and Members of the City Council
Jack lam, A?CP, City Manager
FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
0Y: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROYEIENT
SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379
AND 14380 {TENTATTYE TRACT 13527) JOINT 1MPROYEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES KITH MATT INLAND EMPIRE AND AHMANSON
DEVELOPMENTS FOR OFF-SITE 1MPROYEPENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379,
14380 AND 14139, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING M4INTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET, WEST OF ET[WANDA AVENUE SUBMITTED
eY WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recmmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Tract Nos. 14379 and 14380, accepting the subfect agreements and
securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and cause said maps to
record.
Tract Nos. 14379 and 14380 are part of Tentatfve Tract 13527 and are located
on the northwest corner of 24th Street and Etiwanda Avenae in the Low Density
Residential District. The Tentative Map consisting of 88 acres of land was
approved by Planning Commission on September 28, 1988.
The Developer, Watt Intand Empire, Incorporated is submitting an agreements
and securities to guarantee the construction of their public on-site
improvements in the following amounts.
Y~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TR 14379 - WgTT INLAND EMPIRE, INC.
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 2
TRACT 14379
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LABOR AND MATERIAL
BOND BOND
On-site Street Improvements f 369,000 f 184,500
On-site Storm Drain 87,000 43,500
Installation of Temporary 257,000 128,500
Basin and Line 0
Removal of Temporary 208,000 104,000
Detention Basin
Landscape 373,000 186,500
;1,294,000 f 647,000
TRACT 14380
On-site Street Improvements f 679,000 f 339,500
On-site Storm Drain 412,000 206,000
Installation of Temporary 257,000 128,500
Detention Basin and Line 0
Removal of temporary 208,000 104,000
Detention Basin
Landscape 605,000 302,500
52,161,000 (1,080,500
Watt inland Empire Incorporated is also submi tting a Joint Improvement
Agreement and Securities with Ahmanson Developments. Ahmanson is developing
Tract 14139. This site is directly north of Tentative Tract 13527 and Ts
conditioned to due many of the same aff-site public improvements. The
securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site public improvements
are as follows:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LABOR AND MATERIAL
BONG BOND
Etlwanda Avenue. North f 347,000 S 173,500
of 24th St.
Etlwanda Ave. Storm Drain 358,000 119,000
24th St. Adjacent to TR 14379 350,000 175,000
24th St. AdJacent to TR 14380 458,000 229,000
24th St.Storm Drain - Debris 2,040,000 1,020,000
Basin to Spreading Grounds
Channel "H" & Debris Basin 876,000 439,000
CCMD Access over Channel "H" 54,000 27,000
Channel "H" Ad,~acent to 7R 14139 646,000 323,000
Northerly Channel XIV-8 576,000 288,000
Etlwanda Ave. Street Improvement 214,000 107,000
Summit Ave. to 24th St.
Interim Basin and Outlet to 731,000 365,500
Spreading Grounds
(6,652,000 (3,326,000
~5
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TR 14379 - MATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC.
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 3
Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the City Clerk's
office.
A Pre-Condemnation Agreement for acquisition of right-of-wdy to construct the
24th Street Storm Drain and Interim detention basin within the Etiwanda
Spreading Grounds fray San Bernardino County Flood Control District and son
Bernardino County and an agreement to guarantee the design and construction of
the interim detention basin within the spreading grounds will be submitted for
approval with a separate staff report.
Respectfully su ted,
l~l
Nm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:LEH:dIw
Attachment
T
RESOLUTION N0. C)/- ~ 9 Q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MNCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT,
II~ROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
SECURITIES AND FINAL NAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract Nos. 14379 and 14380, consisting
of 118 tots, submitted by Natt Inland Eapire, Incorporated, Subdivider,
located on the north side of 24th Street, west of Etlwanda Avenue, to the low
Density Resfdentfal District has been submitted to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Finat Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution 6y said
City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for
approval Bald Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets
delineated thereon.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of said City and the Cityy Clerk fs
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to aRDroval as to form and
content thereof Dy the Ctty Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
_r
RESOLUTION N0. 9/•~~9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.
7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7
FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Otvision 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Aci of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exh161t "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance 01strTCt have filed with Lhe City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NON, THEREFORE, THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation
of the property as shown in Exhtblt "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including ~TieTevy of all assessments, shall be appllcabie to the territory
annexed hereunder.
`h C~
EXHIBIT 'B'
PRGIECT NA6E: TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14360
N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lam s to be Annexed
District No. _~ ~ ~_
I
7
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Cownunlty Turf Ground Cover Trees
D1strlct No. Street Name Equest.Trail Sg• ft. Sq. ft. Ea.
7
~9
,,i, a vc nniv v.nv ,.,,,,r~iv,~iv„rv
STAFF REPORT
GATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: W1117e Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND
ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 91-
ll, LOCATED AT 9595 LUCAS RANCH ROAD, NORTH OF 4TH STREET,
SUBMITTED BY JAMES AND PATRICIA MANHI RE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving CUP 91-11, accepting the subJect agreement and security, and
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street
LTghting Maintenance Dl strict Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the HAyor and the
City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACK6RWND
CUP 91-11, located at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street, in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Specific Plan was
approved by the Planning Camm1551on an June 12, 1991, for a contractor's
office and yard on 1.19 acres of land.
The Developers, James and Patricia Manhire are submitting an agreement and
security tc guarantee the construction of the puD11c improvements in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 54,360.00
Labor and Material Bond: 52,180.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
ACS) "Le. ~-~.
Mm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:WV:dlw
Attachments 50
RESOLUTION N0. Cl~, ~ Qa
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROYEMENi SECURITY FOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT N0.
91-11
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an improvement Agreement executed on
October 16, 1991, by James and Patricia Manhire as developers, for the
Improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road, north of
4th Street; and
NNEREAS, the instailation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conJunctlon with the development of said real property as referred to Planning
Commission, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11; and
NNEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES thatsaid Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security
be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest thereto.
~~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~. 3o r
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY i0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.
3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 6
FOR CUP 91-11
WHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
HNEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the"proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineers Report .
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION ?: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including ~FeT of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
5~-
.A.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
r-/F7'h' STi~cc
0
u
Q
~ 9595 [OCAS
RANCH ,4D
N
V
~'
V
i
FOURTH SrREEr
-r -
/~(O. O.~ STREET TRE'S - 2 EA• EUCA[yP,'u5 NiCHO[//
yTiPEET UG.HT - it/pNE
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
• r; - COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
'~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA CUP _9/-// _
~,_~
EXHIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME: CUP 91-11
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1.19 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 2.38 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No, of LamQs to_be Annexed
District No. 38001 9500[I6~~ ----~2~0'0-~If~
I --' °- --- --- ---
6 -__ _.._ ___ ___ ___
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Camaunlty Turf Ground Cover Trees
District No. Street Nave Eguest.Tra11 Sg• ft• Sg. ft. Ea.
3 Lucas Ranch Rd. --- --- --- 2
NV:10/16/91
5~
- ------ CITY OF RAtiCHCJ CI`CAMOtiG.1
STAFF REPORT
,_
DATE: October 16, 1991 s
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Councii I
Jack Lam, RICP, City Manager
FROM: Ian. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II~
SUBJECT: APPROYAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
13566-1, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE BETNEEN
NARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND CHERRY AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY
ROCKFIELD DEVELOPMENT I
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13566-1 were approved
by the City Council on October 5, 1989, in the following total amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: f1,458,000
Labor and Material Bonds: f 129,000
The developer, Rockfleld Development, is requesting approval of a
12-month extension on said Improvement agreement in order to complete the
street Improvements within the tract, and at so on summit Avenue,
including the landscaping, medians and equestrian trails. Copies of the
Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfuily submfSted, ~ p~
f'c"i'
Nm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:sd
Attachments
5.5
Fmdcfieki
(xcic4mern
September 25. 1991 ('Ix)7uratrxl
Certified P 765 842 899
Mr. Steve Gilliland
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineering Division
P. O. Box 807
D p L? E ~' %? s D
StP 30 1991
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CITY Uh NFNi:e'v em:~MUNGA
Regarding: Improvement Agreement, Extension for Tract 13566-1
Dear Steve'
Our current Improvement Agreement for Tract 13566-1 is due to
expire on October 4, 1991. Due to current economic conditions as
well as ongoing city and SBCFCD negotiations which have hindered
construction, please allow this correspondence to serve as
Rockf field Development Corporations request to extend the
Improvement Agreement for one (1) year. We understand that once
accepted, our new expiration date will be October 4, 1992. The
following will serve to justify our request.
1. 13566-1 In-tract Street Improvements - Street should be
paved within six (6) weeks. Upon completion, we will request
city acceptance and bond exoneration.
2. 13566-1 24th Street Improvements From Wardman Bullock Road
to San Sevaine Wash, South Side Only -Street capped, we
will request city acceptance and bond exoneration.
3. 13566-1 Landscape Eaet Property Line - No work commenced due
to city and SBCFCD ongoing negotiations. These negotiations
should be finalized shortly, at that time we will commence
construction and complete in approximately two (2) months.
4. 13566-1 Median and Parkway Landscape - 95% complete. Delay
commencing equestrian trail due to city and SBCFCD ongoing
negotiations.
5. 13566-1 Equestrian Trail - 25% complete. Delay in
construction due to city and SBCFCD ongoing negotiations and
fear to commence any construction before landscape plan is
approved.
6. 13566-1 & -2 Storm Drain - 98% complete. Construction of
catch basin will not commence until 13566-2 street
improvement plans are finalized. These plans are in plan
check at this time.
7. 13566-1 Flood Wall -Wall is complete, we will request bond
exoneration. ~
III u I ~ lhlnlnr' 1)fl~r c1113 • (1)fol,~t. (~..~I, ~1, • I7~Ji ~;2-HH(lU .l(~X ~; ~J~ d; a ' 1 tli~l
Page 2
September 25, 1991
Mr. Steve Gilliland
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONTA
Thank you for your consideration concerning this matter. Should
you have anY questions or require further information, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
ROCRFIELD DEVBLvPMENT CORPORATION
~ti'Y
H.J. Geary
Vice President, Operations
HJG/pk
Attachments: (1) Three executed and notarized Improvement
Agreement 6xtenaion Forms
(2) Fee - Check for $251.00
5~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~ '~~ a-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1
NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by Rockfield Development as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the south side of Summit Avenue
between Hardman Bullock Road and Cherry Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s to be done 1n
confunctton with the development of said Tract 13566-1; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied 6y good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is Identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
S8'
--- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the C1ty Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~
BY: Steve M. Gi1111and, Public Norks Inspector II ~~-
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
13566-1 AND -3, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE Of SUMMIT AYENUE
BETNEEN NARDMAN BULLOCK RDAD AND SAN SEVAINE ROAD,
SUBMITTED DY THE CARYN COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the C1ty Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the puD11c improvements for Tract 13566-1 and -3 were
approved by the C1ty Councii on October 5, 1989, 1n the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: :2,791,000
Labor and Material Bond: =1,395,500
The developer, The Caryn Company, 1s requesting approval of a 6-month
extension on said improvement agreement to order to complete the
remaining street improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available 1n the C1ty Clerk's Office.
Respectfully subnyf~ted, /~
Nm. Joe O'Neil ~ L/~
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:sd
Attachments
The Caryn Developmen(Cornpany
34 [xecutive Park. Suite 155, /rwne. Cvhlornia 92714
0llice (714J 863-9001 FAX p14J 9630199
September 4, 1991
Mr. Joe O'Neil
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
RE: Tract 13566 1 & 3 Improvement Agreement
Wardman - Bullock Road, A.K.A. Lower Loop Road
Dear Joe:
Pursuant to our discussions in the last few weeks and the July 9,
1991 extension request submitted to Shintu Bose, please issue an
extension to the improvement agreement for the Crossing of the San
Sevaine Basins at Wardman - Bullock Road.
As previously discussed, You indicated that an extension would be
granted for a six month time period in order to allow the traffic
study on the regional impacts of the I15/Rte 30 interchanges on the
crossing to be completed and analyzed by the City. This traffic
study would provide the appropriate detail to validate if a
crossing of the Basins is required or not and if so, what alignment
and size would be most appropriate.
The deferment of the drainage and systems development fees would
also be extended with this improvement agreement extension.
Please contact us as to when this extension can be granted as we
are anxious to have the agreement extended prior to the October 3,
1991 deadline. Thank you.
Sincerely:
T4'~"~~
Kevin Pohlson
Vice President
cc: Thomas McCall
Shintu Bose
Steve Gilliland
Cindy Hackett
~~
RESOLUTION N0. 9~' ~ O 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1
AND -3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, bas for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by The Caryn Company as developer, for the
improvement of pubilc right-of-way ad3acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the south side of Summit Avenue
between Wardman Bullock Road and San Sevaine Road; and
NlIEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, is to be done 1n
con,lunction with the development of said Tract 13566-1 and -3; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NDN, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
CaUfornla hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and Lhe same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
~r
---- C[TY OF RANCHO CL'CAb10NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks inspector II~y ~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSI N FOR TRACT
13727, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN STREET
AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED DY SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It 1s recommended that the City Councii adapt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACK6ROOND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13727 were approved by
the City Council on October S, 1989, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 5146,000.
Labor and Material Bond: f 73,000.
The developer, Southland Development, 1s requesting approval of a
12-month extension on said Improvement agreement. Nhi1e the improvements
are substantially complete, the developer 1s complying with the
development code by having instailed a wrought iron fence to the street
to secure the model complex. The improvements cannot be accepted until
such time that the fence is removed. Caples of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Mn. Joe O'Ne11~ ~ ~~
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:1y
Attachments
a
Southland Development Corporation ~
3807 Sierta Highway "29, Suite 210
Acton, CA 98510
TeL(80b)269.1696
FAX (805) 269-2216
September 23, 1991
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Attention: Steven M. Gilliland
Public Work Inspector
Gentlemen:
S
L'
B
C
R
B
A
A
Y
n
C
f)
U
T
R
}'
S
I
U
F;
U
\'
E
I,
f)
P,
Mi
C
T
S
Re: Tract 13727
Subject: Extension of Improvement Agreement
We are requesting an extension of 12-moo [hs time for the completion
of imp rovemen [s on the above referenced tract.
All of the improvements have been completed at [his time. In
complying with the Planning Department we have installed a wrought
iron fence and gates across Napa Street in order [o use the houses on
Napa Street as sales models.
We anticipate that all sales activity will be completed within the
next 12-months, at which time we will remove the fence and gates.
Upon removal of the fence and gates, we will request the City [o
accept Napa Street.
Should you need additional information, please contact the undersigned.
'nce rely
D. rdon Dreis ach
President
A\1) BUILDF,RS
RESOLUTION N0. 9r- ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13727
NNEREAS, the City Countll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hes for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by Southland Development as developer, for the
Improvement of puD11[ right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described thereto, and generally located at the wouthwest corner of Carnelian
Street and Highland Avenue; and
ImprovementE Agreement andt slub,~ect to the ht rmmsroth renof, iss to bbe done ain
con,lunction with the development of said Tract 13727; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
California0hereby Rreso vest thattseldoImprovement Agretement Extenslanuand said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the C1ty Clerk to attest thereto.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
BATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13753
LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE
ROAD AND MILL IKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM LYON
COh1PANY.
RECOMT£NDATION
It is recommended that the City Councii adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Bald agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANILLYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public Improvements for Tract 13753 Landscape were
approved by the City Council on February 16, 1989, in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: E225,700.00
Labor and Material Bond: 5112,65D.DD
The developer, William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Although City Council has been
approving extensions of 6 months, it is being recommended that a 12 month
extension be approved in this case because, William Lyon's merchant
builder (Pennhill Development) has not started the street improvements
for Tract 13753; hence, Wllltam Lyon has not started the landscape
construction. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are
availabie to the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully sub d, one 0
~~(~
Wm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:Iy
Attachments+
LYON ~~~,ILLIAM LYON i<u~7~ion~
41,90 VON HARMAN. PO BOX 7520. NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92658-7520 • (71G) 833-3600 • F.SX (T/.; d]bP604
September 12, 1991
hlr. Steve Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 97729
Re: Tract 13753 Landscape
Improvement Agreement Extension
Deat Steve,
r~
I ~ ll
Transmitted herewith is a check in the amount of 5251.00 and three (3(
Improvement Agreement Extensions executed in triplicate and notarized
for subject tract.
We are asking for a one year extension due to the fact that our
improvements cannot be completed until the merchant builder (Pennhill(
proceeds with their project.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Respectfully,
~~ ~.LL,
Lori Brown
Purchasing
Inland Empire Division
~~
pc,~, r, ;. rr ~~; Vli~`~YEryt
RESOLUTION NO. Cr/~3~ ,~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753
LANDSCAPE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by The William Lyon Company as developer, for
the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner
of Base Line Road and Miiliken Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13753 Landscape; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Cit1' Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
7
- - -- - CiTY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Maya r, and Members of the C1ty Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer ~~~
8Y: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspector II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13812
LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF ETINANDA AVENUE BETNEEN SUMMIT
AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MATT INLAND
EMPIRE, INC.
RECplEMDATION
It 1s recommended that the C1ty Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to 51gn said agreement.
BACKGROIIID/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13812, were approved by
the C1ty Council on September Z0, 1990, in the following total amounts:
Faithful Performance Bonds: f5,391,000.
Labor and Material Bonds: f2,695,500.
The developer, Natt Inland Emp1re, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said Improvement agreement. They have completed only
approximately 5i of their required improvements. Copies of the
Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the C1ty Clerk's Office.
Respectfully su ltted,
~G~~l
Vhn. Joe O'Ne11
City Engineer
WJO;SMG:Iy
Attachments
WATT INLAND EVIPIR E, INC.
9035 MAVEM AVE BI.O 2 9TE !G2
FANCMO CVCnMO NGR C4 9!]30
1]I <I 9995663 GAM 1]II~ 9i65BfiB
} ~ <
September 11, 1991 -•
a 1 ~ p-a;
°crra ~u •
City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ '~ ~!':~!~r y "a
Engineering Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Engineering Division
Re: Tract 13812-Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Oear Dan,
' ~ ..
v~
Cir~,F .~.a /,c .
y, , ;
'~b7ny -
Please accept this letter as a formal request for the extension of
our improvement agreement for the above referenced tract. The
Agreement is scheduled to expire on September 19, 1991.
As you are aware, the building industry has been hit hard by the
recession. We are in the process of renegotiating our loans which
will allow us to move forward with the development.
I have enclosed a check in the amount of $251 and an executed copy
of the Improvement Agreement Extension form.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
sincer ly,
wis
rec or of Development
(wp51\tr-13812\city\extaggr}
D ~s by ,5 I rQ !~
SEP 16 19?!
;.ry n; I;gac~ ~ :, :a.vc~;r
~9
A WATt ENTEPPpI5E5 COMPANv
RESOLUTION N0. 9~~JOW
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY fOR TRACT 13812
HHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by Natt Inland Empire, Inc., as developer, for
the Improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property
specifically described thereto, and generally located on the west side of
Etlwanda Avenue between Summit Avenuet and Highland Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s to be done in
conJunction with the development of said Tract 13812; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Ts identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
70
----- CITI' OF RAtiCHO CCCA;vIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1951
TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector iI~~~,~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR OR 87-56,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND
JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY STENiON JERSEY PARTNERS
It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subiect agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACRSROUN6/Alw.rsts
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for DR 87-56 ware approved by the
City Council on September 5, 1990, in the foilawing amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 390A,000
Labor and Material Bond: 5452,000
The developer, Stenton Jersey Partners, 1s requesting approval of a
60-day extension on said improvement agreement 1n order to complete the
remaining Improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension
are avatla6le 1n the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Nm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:sd
Attachments
,_'' Mission
-r-;_:
1i t t Equ!tY
September 12, 1991
Mr. Steve Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
Engineering Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement for D.R.87-56
Dear Steve:
In accordance with your letter dated August 27, 1991, we
hereby request the extension of the above referenced
improvement agreement. We have attached a check in the amount
of $251.00, which is the Eee you stated is required to
provide for the extension of this agreement. Also attached
is the improvement agreement extension form signed and
notarized.
The only work remaining to be completed on this entire
improvement agreement is a small amount of sidewalk to be
poured at the end of Boston Place. We are presently working
out an agreement with the Lincoln Property Company who are
the owner's of the property adjacent to that area. We expect
to have this sidewalk poured by the end of October.
If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
S,i/nn c~e ely, ,~/J
Robert D. Garrison
Exeeuti ve Vice President
cc: Chris Hector
7~-
28202 Cabot Roatl. SuAe 200 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (714) 6435888 FAX (714) 6435814
RESOLUTION N0. 9~~~ 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CgLIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
ExiENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-56
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by Stanton Jersey Partners as developer, for the
Improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Rochester
Avenue and Jersey Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such Improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subfect to the terms thereof, 1s to De done in
con,lunction with the development of said OR 87-56; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified
1n said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Ex4nston on behalf of
the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
73
---- CI'PY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, A1CP, C1ty Manager
FROM: 4M1a. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. G11111and, Pub11c Norks Inspector I1
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DR 89-14
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARRON ROUTE EAST OF
INTERSTATE-15 FREENAY, SUBMITTED BY AMPAC, INC. 'i
IIECOMIENOATION
It is recommended that the City Council adapt the attached resolution,
acceptln9 the sub,{ect agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to s19n said agreement.
BACKGROIINB/AMAL~SIS
improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the publ7c improvements for DR 89-14 were approved by the
City Council on September 20, 1990, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: f268,000.
Labor and Material Bond: f134,000.
The developer, Ampac, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said Improvement agreement. ?he required improvements have
not been started, nor can they start until such time that the
Metropolitan Mater Dtstrlct completes their Improvements 1n the saRz
area. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the
C1ty Clerk's Office.
Respectfully sub~llq,,~4t~lt~a~d_~, 77 ~~~ /~~^
\~'' ~ liC. Vl'
IAn. Joe O'Neil '//j
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:Iy
Attachments
,~~~,~c
AMERICAN PACIFIC CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, INC
P.O. BOX 1979 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 51729 Tel. 714989-1092 Fax 77 4-945 7 686
'. i
September 16, 1991
JLI '..
Steve M. Gilliland C"°
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729
Re: Extension of Agreement Dr 89-14
Dear Steve:
Ampac is requesting a one year extension of time on
Improvement Agreement for Dr 89-14. As I indicated in our
telephone conversation we have been contacted by Alice
Mauprn with MWD regarding their work on the Etiwanda
emergency discharge conduit which is being constructed in
part on the north west portion of Ampac property. The
construction as well as the construction easement, precludes
our installation of street improvements, irrigation water,
landscaping. and additional on site improvements related to
these items of work. The MWD time table for construction
now looks like one year will be required.
The completed agreement extension forms are enclosed for
your execution.
Respectfully Submitted
American Pacific Concrete Pipe Co.
V
es Foe a
~5
RESOLUTION N0. C~~'~~O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 89-14
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, 6y Ampac, Inc. as developer, for the Improvement
of public right-of-way ad,{acent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located at the south side of Arrow Route east of
Interstate-15 Freeway; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done Tn
con,lunction with the development of said DR 89-14; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said ]mprovement Agreement Extension.
Cal ifornia0herebyERres~olvesththattsaldotmproveme t Agretement Extensionuandsald
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Cierk to attest thereto.
7~
--- ------ clrr of ea:~cxo c i:carto+rca
STAFF REPORT ^~ ~
~~
DATE: October 15, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council mil) ~
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
i
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pu611c Works Inspector II
SUBJECT: APPROYAL OF IMPROYEMENT ABREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP
1285-0 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AYENUE BETWEEN
CATALPA STREET AND YICTORIA STREET, SUBMITTED BY STYLE
MOMES
RECOMIEMBATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subiect agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sa14 agreement.
BACics-1ou~/ANarsls
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 12854 were
approved By the City Council on September 20, 1990, in the foltowing
amounts:
Faithful Perfonaance Bond: 516,373.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 8,186.00
The developer, Style Nomes, fs requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement to order to secure finanatng,
seek construction bids, and to complete all required improvements.
Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the Ctty
Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Wfn. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer lJ
11JO: SMG: iy
Attachments
77
STYLE HOMES CO. L. P_
1809 CielHo Avenue. Monterey park, G 91764. (213)688-2739
Sep. 10, 1991
City of Rancho Cucanmgnga
Cortmunity Developnent Department
Engineering Division
Re: Extension Request of Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map #12854
Dear sir:
Your letter regarding the expiration of the improvement Agreement has been re-
ceived. We vould like to apply hereby an extension of said agreement for the
maximum period allowed by your Municipal Code.
Some of our limited partners scattered in New York and Brazil is the main rea-
son of this delay. However, we are in process of rnllect ing all the bids for
eheir review. We are seeking 12 months extension for fund gathering antl faith-
ful execution of the Improvement Agreement.
Three forms and fee are enclosed. If you have any question, please feel free to
rnntact me at (213) BBB-2739. Thank you.
Sincere / , _
/- ~i
Style o. L. p.
Deli Home Corp - general partner
Chi in Chov~ - president
RESOLUTION N0. CJ~'.3o
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL IMP 12854
YMEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Callfornla, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on October 16, 1991, by Style Homes as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way ad3acent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the west side of East Avenue between catalpa
Street and Victoria Street; and
NHEREAS, the tnstallatlon of such Improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and suD3ect to the terms thereof, is to be done 1n
con3unctton with the development of said Parcel Map 12854; and
1MEREAS, said Improvement Agreement .xtenslon is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOM, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Ctty Clerk to attest thereto.
~9
- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT F.t
~~,
t~
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
October 16, 1991
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer 'I
Steve M. Gi1171and, Public Norks Inspector II~~.-
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOT2 CE OF
COMPLETION FOR TRACT 12420 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHNEST CORNER I
OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET. i
RECOMIEIDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 12420 have been completed in
an acceptable manner, and 7t is recommended that Ctty Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of
530,000.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in
the anbunt of f300,000.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALVSIS
Tract 12420 - located at the southvrest corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th
Street
DEVELOPER: Rancho Park Venture
1608 S. Vineyard Avenue
Ontario, Cp 91761
Accept:
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 30,000.00
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5300,000.00
Respectfully subml~tted,
/ ~~
Nm. Joe O'Neil U
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:Iy
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO- Cf/- ~-~y~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12420 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12420 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
81
- ---- CITF OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~
.v~
DATE: October I6, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer I,
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II~
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13367 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
HELLININ AVENUE AT HIGHLAND AVENUE
RECONENDATIOM:
The required street improvements for Tract 13367 have been completed in
an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount oP
529,882.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n
the amount of f298,819.00.
B1ICKGAOINID/ANALYSIS
Tract 13367 - located on the east side of Hellman Avenmue at Highland
Avenue
DEVELOPER: Homecoming Partners, Ltd
3870 La Sierra Avenue, Suite 307
Riverside, CA 92505
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 29,882.00
Release:
Falthfui Performance Bond (Street) 5298,819.00
Respectfully submitted,//~ 7 ~,
v / LGUI
Nm. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:Iy
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. ~/~31 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 13367 AND AUTNORiZING THE FILING OF A N07ICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13367 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the vrork complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the vrork is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 15
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
g3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II
,: .
~;
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR 7645 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE, LOCATED ON ALTA
CUESTA DRIVE BETNEEN CAMINO SUR AND VALLE VISTA DRIVE
RECOMIEMDIITIOM:
The required street improvements for 7645 Alta Cuesta Drive have been
completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City
Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond in the amount of 53,800.
BACKGRpAVD/AIUILVSES
7645 Alta Cuesta - located on Alta Cuesta Drive 6etrreen Camino Sur and
Valle Vista Drive
DEVELOPER: Dave Boggs
7645 Alta Cuesta Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release:
Fat*.hfui Performance Bond (Street) (3,800
Respectfully submitJt~¢edG~,(/~/l,
Nm. Joe O'Neil U
Ctty Engineer
kUO:SMG:sd
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. %! ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALffORNiA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR 7645 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A N07iCE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 7645 Alta Cuesta
Drive have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Natlce of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
Q~
----- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
i~
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
October 16, 1991
Mayor; and Members of the Ctty Council
Jack Lam, AILP, City Manager
Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12577
LOCATED AT PILGRIMS COURT AND 19TH STREET
RECOMMEIDIITIgI
It is recaam~ended that the City Council authorize Lhe City Clerk t0
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond.
The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street
improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER: Nordic Development
1500 Qua11 Street, Suite 520
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) (17,900.00
Respectfully submt ed, ~~'],
(i/
Mn. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:Iy
----- CITY (lF RA'.VCHO CtiCAMnDlG.t
STAFF REPORT
~~
s,%~
DAZE: October 16, 1991
T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
RY: Steve M. Gi1111and, Pub11c Morks Inspecfa>_{~_ ~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOIiD FOR TRAC T 12969
LOCATED ON EDNIN STREET SOUTH OF ARRON HIGHNAY
REC01lENOATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the C1ty Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond.
BACKGROUND(AMALY5I5
The requtred one year maintenance period has ended and the street
improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER: Hagop and Yegia Yazed,~lan
P.0. Box 963
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street} f11,300.00
Respectfully sutyatLted,
Nm. Joe O'Neil
~~~~
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:Iy
~7
CITY OF RANCHO CliCA~tONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
October 16, 1991
Mayor, and Members of the Ctty Council
Jack Lam, AiCD, City Manager
Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~
Steve M. Gilliland, Publte Norks Inspector~rr
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13445
LOCATED ON THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE.
RECOMMENDIITIOM
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond.
The required one year maintenance pperiod has ended and the street
Improvements remain free from defects 1n materiais and workmanship.
DEVELOPER: The N/111am Lyon Comapny
4490 Von Karmen
Newport Beach, CA 92658-7520
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 572,400.00
Respectfully subm ed, ~ n
Vt"
Mn. Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
NJO:SMG:Iy
oils yr nevivunv vuueiivavivvn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 1fi, 1991
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner
SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE - Review of current City
regu lationa affecting storage and parking of Recreational
Vehicles on private residential properties.
REOON~NDATIOM
The City Council should take public testimony, reviex the recd®endation
made 6y the Recreational Vehicle Submmeittee, and either confirm or
modify the general direction suggested by the Subcommittee.
BACIOGIDOND
Following the last public hearing on Chia matter, the City Council
selected a Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members Nllllams and
Wright, to develop a recommendation for consideration by the full City
Council. The Subcommittee has met several times with a working group of
residents who have been active in this issue.
This working group represented a vide range of opinions. Although it
was not possible to fins a eo lotion acceptable to everyone, the
discussions were very helpful. Eventue lly, a consensus on several key
points was reached.
These key points form the baste for Lhe Subcommittee's recommendation,
outlined Ln the form of a suggested "STATEMENT OP INTENT" which
follows. IE this statement can be accepted as a valid ref lectlon of
Council policy on this issue, it would become the basis for the actual
ordinance modifications.
g9
C LTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE
October 16, 1991
Page 2
STATEMENT OF INTENT:
It is the ultimate goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that
recreational vehicles are stored only in areas which are deai goad and
developed to accommodate such storage. This may be on individual
private properties, where loi size and site layout permit these vehicles
to be stored safely and with sensitivity to the health and wet Ea re of
the neighborhood, oc in cormaon storage areas off -9 its.
This goal is reflected in the current ordinances adopted on August 7,
1988, which prohibLts permanent storage of recreational vehic lee in the
front yard areas of single family homes. The ordinance has recently
undergone an extensive review by the City's Public Safety and Planning
Commissions. Eoth Commissions have recommended that the ordinance be
retained, with only minor modifications.
However, the City Council recognizes that many recreational vehicle
owners had purchased their homes in the City p[L or to the adoption and
implementation of Ghe new zegulationa.
The City Council recognizes the hardship created through the adoption of
the new regulations for those whose properties can no longer reasonably
accommodate their recreational vehicle under the new regulations.
With these considerations in mind, and in the interest of balancing the
needs and ri ghta of individuals with requirements of public safety and
the welfare of the community as a whole, it is therefore directed that
the current regulations be modified to accrompllsh the following:
1. In the long-term, permanent storage of recreational vehicles in
Etont yard areas should not be permitted.
2. RV owners who can demonstrate ownership of the dwelling and RV
prior to August 1988 (effective date of the current or dl nonce)
should be able to continue to store their vehicles in accordance
with regulations in effect prior to August 1988, provided a 1o-
foot setback from the sidewalk is maintained.
3. RV owners who purchased their dwelling or AV between August 1988
and now should be allowed to store their vehicles in the front
yard area only iE:
a. their lot cannot reasonably accommodate RV storage under
current sego Lations, and
b. they can meet the pre-1988 standards and a 10-foot aetbaok
from the sidewalk.
90
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE
October 16, 1991
Page 3
4. Future RV owners should be subject to the current ordinance which
prohibits permanent front yard storage altogether.
5. Planned Communities of Victoria, Terra Vista, and Caryn should
continue to be governed by the current regulations and the
"grandfather in g" (as outlined under 2 and 3 above) ahould NOT
apply in these areas.
(Since their inception, the Planned Communl ties were developed
under a separate set of development standards, with relatively
small lots as a trade off for common open apace, and front yard
setbacks too small to accommodate storage of recreational
vehicles.)
6. Tnis approach, if adopted by the City Council, should be well
publicized and the public and real estate rnmmunity ahould be
made well aware of all City regulations affecting RV parking and
storage.
(Important Note: Ae gulatione in effect prior to October 1988 did not
allow unrestricted storage in front yard setback areas. Aather,
these regulations specified the conditions under which RV storage
could occur: on an improved surface located between the driveway and
the nearest side property line.)
CONCLOSIOf1
In its recormnendation, [he Subcommittee has attempted to:
1) confirm and clarify the City's long term goals,
2) respect the needs of pre-existing, non-conforming areas,
3) not compromise the requirements of public safety, and
4) recognize the unique qualities of the Planned Communities.
If the City Council can support this approach through the adoption of
the suggested "Statement of Intent", staff should then be directed to
draft specific modifications to existing ordinances for consideration
at a Future hearing.
Resp ally Ott
/era~t)y er
City P nner
BB:OK:sp
Attachments: June 19, 1991 City Council Staff Report
9~
CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: .tune 19, 1991 (1
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council yV~
.Tack Lam, AICP, City Manager ,
FROM: Brad eu llez, City Planner
gy; Otto Kroutil. Deputy City Planner
SUHJ ECT: RECREATIONAL VEAICLE STORAGE - Review of current City
regulations affecting storage and parking of Recreational
Vehicles on private residential properties.
~CpNiR7DA2IDB: The Council should review recommendations made by the
Planning Coamiission and the Public Safety Commission, take public
testimony, and provide staff with appropriate policy direction.
Available options include direction to:
1. Retain the current ordinance, as recommended by the Yublic
Safety Commission; or
2. Retain the current ordinance, but relax the time limits from
24 hours Lo five days, as recommended by the Planning
Cnnm1i a610R~ nr
3. Ease the restrictions on certain vehicles, utilizing criteria
suggested by the two Commissions; or
4. Any other modifications deemed appropriate by the City
Council.
gACxGW[IpDx Aevlew of the City's RV regulations for residential
properties was initiated by the City Council in response to Community
concerns. The Council requested that two City coamiesiona, the Public
Safety Commission and the Planning Commission, review the existing
ordinance and make recommendations on the issue to the City Council.
Vhat does the current ordinance ea7T
Existing requlaLiona dealing with ALL vehicles (not Just RV`s)
distinguish between "storage," which Ls Considered permanent, and
"parking," which is o£ a temporary nature.
The ordinance proh ibita all "storage" in residential front yards; NO
vehicles for other items such as equipment, materials, etc.1 may be
permanently stored in Eront yards or corner side yards. ftecreatlonal
vehicles are c..nsidered "stored" after 24 hoots of continuous parking.
Parking for up to 24 hours is permitted in the front yard areas.
CITY COVNCIL STAFF REPORT
RV STORAGE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 19, 1991
Page 2
The current ordinance does allow storage of AV's (and other vehicles) on
single fami Ly lots, in rear yards and interior side yards only.
Although screening is required, fences need not exceed five (5) feet in
height.
fihat is at issue?
At issue is whether or not permanent storage of RV's in the Er oat yards
of single family homes should continue to be prohibited.
Over the last year, a number of public meetings were held by both the
Planning Commission and the Public Safety Commission. Representatives
of the recreational vehicle group were involved in discussions with
staff and the two commissions. A wide range of issues were raised
during these meetings, and it became apparent that the only real
question is the storage of recreational vehicles in the front yards of
single family homes. Existing restr ictiona on public street parking and
requirements for screening and maintenance, which were also discussed,
were stated NOT to be an issue for the RV group representatives.
POBLIC SAP617 CpQQ SSiON REVI6I/: The Public Safety Commission was
charged with a review of the current ordinance Erom the perspective of
public safety.
The Public Safety Commission reviewed information on eight lines and
visibility conflicts, slope conditions, and other safety and security
considerations. Ivey information presented to the Commission is attached
to this report.
At the conclusion of its review, the Public Safety Commission
recommended to the City Council that no change be made to the present
ordinance. However, the Public Safety Commission has also recommended
that if for some reason the City Council determines that modifications
to the rucrent ordinance are appropriate, that the following be
considered:
"If the regulations affecting the storage of certain recreational
vehicles in front yard arena are to be telexed, the following
criteria should be used:
a. Only self-propelled, self-contained, and fully secured
vehicles such as motor homes, house ce z9, and campers mounted
on pickups may be stored in the required front yard areas.
b. Such veh iclee may not extend over a public sidewalk or zight-
oE-way line, nor may they be stored within 10 feet from the
back of sidewalk or right-of-wa}' line.
c. Vehicles stored in the front yard may not be located within 5
feet of the residence, garage, or other structure.
d. No vehic lea may 6e stored on slopes exceeding 10 percent."
93
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
AV STORAGE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 19, 1991
Page 3
PLANNING COIgfISS10N ABVISY: The Planning Commission discussions were on
matters of land use, aesthetics, maintenance, and on the feasibility of
enfozcement. The Planning Commission considered modifications cE time
limits, possible gtandfathezin9, and development of standards Dosed on
types of vehicles stored. Other cities' regulations were also
reviewed. This information is also attached.
The Planning Commission concluded its review with a recommendation that
the current ordinance be retained, but that the time limits on parking
in the front yard areas be extended from 24 hours to five days of
continuous parking. Thi9 would make the time limits consistent with
restrictions on other vehicles.
The Commission also suggested that if the Council des ited fur thec
modifications, additional flexibility could be considered under a
permitting process, with appropriate criteria to be developed.
SOIOI~AT/(AIN7.BSI0.7: The Commissions' revlew of Recreational Vehicle
regulations has now been completed. The Public Safely Commission
recommends that the current ordinance be retained as i. s• The Planning
Commission recommends Chat the current ordinance be retained, with a
relaxation of time limits from 24 hours to five days.
Both Comau as ions concur that if the Council feels additional
modifications are necessary, specific criteria such as minimum setbacks
and restrictions based on the type of vehicle would be needed. in that
event, the Planning Coamission would suggest a possible permitting
process. The City Council should review these recommendations and
provide staff with appropriate policy direction.
Aeape• ly sub e
Brad ller
City Planner
BB:OK/jfg
Attachments: Exh Sbit "A" - Ordinance No. 360
Exhibit "B" - Planning commission Staff Report and
(draftl Minutes of May Z2, 1991
Exhibit "C" - Public Sefety Commise ion Staff Report end
Minutes of December 4, 1990
9~/
ORDINANCQ N0. 360
AN ORDINANQ 0! 196 CIT! OOONCIL Ol 1116 CZ1T 0! RANQ10
COGNDNOA. GLIN3RNSA, AIRNDING 80ESECTION 17.06.07p-C AND
17.1].030-D, AND ADDIRB A NEN 30ESELTiON 17.10.OS0-0 10
IN6 RANCNO CIIGMDIR:A SONICIAIL mDE FERTAININ: TO 9~ICL6
pARIQMi NI'DIIN RESIDENfIAG. OONl6RCiAi./ORIICE AND
INDDSTAIAL DI3IRICl3
A. R•eitala.
(i) On May 13, 1966, the plammity Cmisaien et the City of Rancbo
Cuerenp cendacred • dnly noticed pabl is heacin3 with rupcc ca the fol3orin3
propoNd Menrent to TicU 17 Of eb• Rancho Cneroeae Mmieipal Cod•
(hereinafter referred to a- the "DeraloPent Cade) reprdin3 re3ulationa for
vehicle parklnE riehin rNidentleli cewwrcial and indaecrlal dieerlce• of the
City.
(ti) At the eonclaeion of aid Nay 25, 1963, public bearinE, tbe.
Plannin3 Coaeiealon adepred id Reaolatlen Mo. 83-l OD ehereby racarnendin- thee"
thin Connell adopt the propowd Der•lopaent Coda rMdeMre a Nt totth !o
ebi• Ordinance.
(iii) On Juoe 13, 3913, ebe City Wuncll of the City o! Rancho
Cucronp co~utted • dolt' ,roeiad pobl is Warini rlth reaper to the propoeed
D•velopaent Coda rendaeata a Ne tert6 barrio and N!d 6easlaE ru concluded
prioe to the ado ption o! thin Ordinanoe.
(iv) All lgal prerpaiaiced prior ro the adoption of chic Ordinance
have oecurrM.
H. Ordinance.
t01.lAMS t
lE6 CIT! ODONCIL 0- 1116 CIT! OS RAN®0 COGMOtEiA D063 EEE10! ORDAIN AS
SECTION !s 14•e all et eha Ucta wr lorth io cha Recital a, Parc A,
of ebia Ordinance an crag and correct.
SECTION Er Subuction 17.03.070-C o! the Derdepenc Code of the City
of Renche Cuaaonq i. hereby tended to read, in rorda and ti3uree, u
fol lord
C. pehlcle tarkina. The parkin3 of rehiclea in all realdential
diatriata eha11 M aeb~ect to eke Io11arln3 proeieionae
ExHiar !~1
9s
Ordinance No. 160
Paae 2
1. the dedsn auldalines and regulations for p-[kina •nu
shall contort, to [bs p[nviaion• o! Chapter 17.12 of eha
Developoent Coda:
2. vehicle pa[kieg shall he rithin the enclowd {asap.
urpore or other rpaipd or aatborizad etbatteee
paved parking crest
1. A11 parking area rithin public vier [rw tba strue,
pool is right-otwq or adjaunt propettiu shall W
paved rith • peoamnt paving aaterial. Sack ens
shall M uintaiMd in • naeable condition tru of
potholes and bsosun Notions aatticLnt co prevent and
and/or Bast, richoat aeewalaHon o! looN saterial or
other deterioratloni
4. Vehicles ast bs grlud or scored in eha aid. or cur
Lard yrovided chat such am i• serNMd !rw •iN free
the atrwt, public rigbcro!-rq and adjauet yrogttiu
ht • fuu, sal 1, er egai~aluc aeraeaiaa uprial at
Iuac !!n (3) Eue in hsighti '
3. Vehicle parkin{ •lthin aide aid cur Lard arm shall
M 1Liud to lira grunt (SZ) o! tba Local loo arw
or tba hwdred (300) sgwn tut, rhichavec is
inetN, unlru Nnatruetad piaawet to n app[nved
711nor Develepaant Rs-ieri
6. erupt a ptoviGd is Subuetion 9 herein, vehicles
psrksd rithin pnblie vier in required or antborisad
Arkin{ gnu rithin the !root Lard, corms aide Lard
or s!M Lard abutting • error Aall M parirad or left
standing for ewperaq pesied^ of eiwe nes to scud
tiw (3) tonweuHve datai
7. "pehielee" a owd !n this Netioe fall Seclude, hot
nes b• lisited to, eosserelal vsbielra, antonhilee,
crocks, trailan, sr+eoe crnelu, awl-nailan,
ao eorcteLs, awpds, opera, cwyer aha1U, hoau or
other Urp posubl• rurastional and caiuercial
egaiPanti end
8. !b uenwrcial wbicle shish ssaeda a `son reight of
one and onrbalt (1 and 1/1) eons, or eaeaada a ridth
o! eighb (!0) inches er nuada a hdght of assen (7)
tar or esueda • length et n.nq-lire (23) tut: no
spacial ised cork related vehicle (e.{. ceetruek,
etabMd trucks. wec.) and no spciel laed cork related
portable puipunt (e.{, event afsera, tellers,
etc.1 i shall he period on alit poreion of a reeiGncial
lot unleaar (1) it is activelt involved in Baking
9~
Ordinanta No. 760
Page 3
pickwpa and deliveries; (1) in eonuction dth, and in
aid to tke prfonanee of • urvlu to. or on. the
ptopert)• than the vehicle i• parbd. rhil• activel7
involved in aneh wtivit7: or (1) in wnfananee •!th
the condltion• of apprmal for • valid Nose Oceuptlon
Pantie •e prodded in Saetion 17.01.060 of the
Oevelopesnc Code;
9. No private, not-eowreial veblel• rhicb Kned• •
srosa reiDht of one and one-halt (1 and 1/2) tone, or
Keesds • rideh of eiDhq (BD) inches, or Keeeds a
hHaht of awes (7) feet or Kweds a lenDt6 of
trenq-lire (YS) feet; and no trailer. ar!-trailer,
hose or portable reenatiotrl egnit~tne shall W parked
or stored rlthis the front lard, corner dde >'ard or
Hde lard abaetiej • street unlwa: (I) it to not a
ceewsreiel rthiele and i• parked for a ta.poraq period
of ttae not to Kceed nent7-tour (7e) houcr. (t) it is
involved in lwdin{ er uslwdlnD aeti~iq; and (1) it
is parbd in cospl lance rith sq othK applicable Ciq
ordinanw:
30. Violation of aq prmiaion o! tbia arbnetion shall be
pmiahable as an infraction.
96C7ION 3; 9nWectlon 17.1II.070-D(N) et tke DweloPKt Code of the
Ciq of P•ncho C\:eponp !e 6ant7 wwded to ewd, ie rorda and liDurea, u
fol iota
B. Asp uwndap paved drirwq er KtMaien of the
prluq delvwq shall not b• rwd toe parkisD unless:
(1) !t coa:reta the prlaar~ drlvwq aewu to • eaeond
acpo point •!th eha Knot or pool is rlahr-oL-rq
(!s. circular drlvwq) dth • continuoee pn~aet
rideh net escudle6 Mlve (It) lots (Z) it !a an
Ktenaion of the pslwr>' drlvwq sward the nearest
ai4 or net lard great or (S) is canKracesd purarane
to ao gprwed Miner DwaloPKr Rwiw.
SNCZION 1; 9ubaeetion 17.IO.OSO-0 is hsreb~ adMd to the Developanr
Code of the CitT of Mncho Cueuonp to W swd, !e rorda and flBucea, u
follora:
0. Vehicle Parkin lha parklnD o! whielea !n di causrdal/
oft a and industrial districts shall b• aubj eet ro the eoliwin6
provieiowt
'fhe desip: Dsldsllnes and
fscllitles shall Conlon to
17.11 el the Dwslep;;snt
ptwiaiona o! the indaatrlal
reptlatlons ter parkin6
the prwislon• o! Obapter
CeM and aq applicabl•
Spseilie Plan:
ExHiw~t ~ ;~
9~
Otdinan<a !b. J60
Pap !
1. 7rbiela prkinr aball ba ritbin balldinp, prap• oz
otbrr rpulrrd or authorizrd orf-aetwt pared paskina
facilieiar.
3. All parkinr laeilitia• •ithin pabl is viw tear for
atraat, pool le right-ol-rq or adjapet proprrq aball
M paved rich • pt•anrnt pwlnr aatarial. Such arra
aball br aaintsinad ie • uwabla condition frar o!
potbolra and brobn wetiona aatticleet co prwaet and
and/or dnat, ritboat accn•aiatioo of loow aatarial or
other Gerriotaeioe;
4. ffi vrhiclr aball b• prtrd for for Parpow of
diaplyina anch phielr for vela or otbrr coaNmiai
activiq, ircludln~, bat not 1Litrd te, iraN, 61rr,
advrrtiain~, •tc, veleta aneb vrhiclr it parirad bt, or
Ath eha rrittre prnLalon o!, • 6n$nru en for
propart~ rhich !a paalttad, lipewd and apprevad to
dLply vrhielaa for each parpowa~
S. t1o vehicle shall M parbd for for patpaw of wpair er
aaintrnancr imlrur (1) aveb rerk is pslenrd on
vrhicirr or~rd er oprracrd ~ ehr oraitr' bnaiwaa
rithin an reelowd bnlldin~ er Yazd sew aerarerd tree
viw trams for atnet. pabite eight-el-ry, adjawnt
proprrtira and spaltrd ott-rttwt parkia~ taeilitira
rich pablis acaui or (1) Le coeroretion •ith • eaesrat
on-aitr buainraa gnletrd to gslon rrpair or
aainernaner of vrbiela^ and Dolt daring ratabl lahad
buHarw bonral
4. tb vehicle shieh is diwbiad, ~nllwnwd. wra~latand,
inopratiq or Iroa rhieh as •rwatial oe lrµll~
rpairrd opratin~ part L raforrd or •!arle~ aball M
prFad ritbin pabl la riw Icaa ehr atrartt publ is
rlabt-ol-ry, adjawne proprrtlrr or rpuirad
ott-retort pskie~ !acllitin rich pobl le acpast
7, tb coaaweeial vrhiel• wewdia~ • avow rridbt of one
and onrbait (1 and 1/1) coca, ae nerrdia~ • rldeh at
•iibt7 (~) lecbra, or a trailer or awi-trrllre shall
4 parlrad rithin • courrelal/oltiw dlreritt uolrare
(1) !t !• aesrrerd trove pnblis viw trove ehr atrgt,
public right-ot- ry aed adjapet proprtlrai (Z) !r is
actiwlp imolvrd in aakin~ piclt-rpr aed 411~ariul or
(3) in conarctlon rich, and in aid to, eha prrtonancr
of • weviw to, or on, ehr peoparty rharr ehr vehicle
is parked, rhilrnctlval~ lvrolwd io each actiriq{
EX H/.0/> ~ ~'
98
Ordinance 80. 760
Page 5
S. "PehideP a used in ehia section shall ineludr. but
not be lfaited to, eauercial vehicles, autaobilo,
trneka, eraile[a, sotor trueb. asi-erailsra,
aotoreteleq aogds, cnsgrs, caagr shells, boar or
other large grtahle rwraacioMl or cwprclal
aquipsenti
9. VSoLtion of ty proriaion of chit anbuctian shall i»
pmisbabls sa an infraction.
gECTION S: The Cip Gnneil daelare• that, should ay Provision,
section, grquph. wncend or coed of ehia OrdiMOee M raadared or declared
invalid bl ay final wort action in • wort of wagteat juriadietion, or bf ,
reason o[ ty prergive legislation, the rwsieing proriaions, wecions,
gragraphs, sentences, and cords of ehia OrdlMnd shall main in lull toree
and et Lct.
SECTION 6i The lY~or sball sign thin Ordinance and the Citt Clerk
shall eauw the sane to M pabliahad •ithin tittaen (13) dye attar its gaaap
n last and is The DaiU 14wet, • nereggr of geeeral eirealatlon published
in eha City o! Onurie, GlilornL, and eizcaland is ebe C!q o! Reecho
Cucronp. Cslitornia.
The Ma)or aball sign ehia OrdlMnd and eha Ciy Clark shall eaaw the ape to
h published riehin titceee (15) dye attar !ta gapp at last once in Tha
Daily 14OOrt. • nersggr of taoeral circulation pabllahad !o eha Citl of
Ongrio. Glitornia, and eieeulatad !e eha C1q of Eanehe GLCUOnp,
Glitornia.
PASS®, APtROpED, and ADOPTED this 6th d•T of Ja1T, 19EE.
ATESt Erarn, Eugwr, Stoat. King, Nright
NOES i NoM
AESENT7 NOM
nni^ L.L. Stoad~~
ATf68T:
Eararlt Authelet, Ciq Clark
~'xHieir~~'
99
Ordinance No. 360
PaBa 6
I, D698lQ,T A. A8'l8~.87. CI1T C1.8RR of tha Cip of I4ncho
Cucaon8a, fSl itornia, do 6arab) cartit~ that ehr toegoioa Ordiunca ru
intsoducrd •t • n8alar autin8 of tha Council of tha City of Rancho Cowonp
held on eha ISth dq of Juno, 1988, and ru fiull~ paaad st • ra8ular rurina
of rha Clt~ Council of tha Ciro of Rancho Cnewonp held oo eha 6th dq of
July, 1988.
14acatad thin 7eh dq of July. 1988 at Rancho CuwonBa. 411ternia.
6.[..
arl~ !.. Aathalat, City Clark
/Do
CITY OF RANCHO CliCA:vIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 22, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner
BY: Otto Krout ll, Deputy City Planner
SVBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE - Review of current City
regulstione stfeoting storage and parking of Racrptional
Vehielu on private ruldential properties.
I. ABSTRACT: ThL report deaU with recreational vehicle storsgs in
front yard areas of •ingls family homes. The report outlines
recommender ions made by tM Public Safety Commission and prow ides
additional information as requested by the Planning Commission.
The report concludes with tour basic policy options, or choices, to W
considered by the Planning Commluion follwing a public haring.
II. BACRGROVND: Thi• review of the City~^ Recreational Vehicle ordinance
was initiated by the City Council. The Council requuted that two
City commiulons, tM Puhl is Safety Commlnion and the Plane Lnq
CommLSion, review the existing ordinance and come back to the City
Council with ehelr reconmendationa.
IIS. PVBLIC SAFETY COMB ISSION REVIEN: The Public Safety Commission was
charged with a rwlew of the currant ordinance from the perspective of
public eatery.
The Puhlic Safety Ca:mLslon hu concluded it^ review of the
Recreational Vehicle Ordlnanee. The PuDllc 9a3eCy Commie ion L
recommending to tN City Council that no changes De made to the
preunt ord seance. However, tN Public Safety commluion hu also
recommended that if for soma reuon Che Clty Council determinu Ghat
modifications to the current ordinance are appropriate, the lollowing
Easton should W considered:
^If the regulatlone affecting the Korage oL certain recnat loess
whLcles in front yard arcs are to be relaxed, the fallowlnq criteria
should be used:
a. only •elf-propelled, self-contained, and fully ucured vehicle•
ouch a• motor homes, house care, and tampers mounted on pickups
may be stored in the required front yard areas.
b. Such vehielu may not extend over • public ddewalk or r~~ht-o[-
way 1Lns, nor may they be stored wtthln 30 Eeet trap the back of
•idewelk or right-of-way line.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RV STORAGE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May Z2, 1991
Page ]
c. Vehicles stored in the front yard may not ba located within 5 feet
of the residence, garage, o[ other structure.
d. No vehicles may 6e stored on •lopaa excedinq 10 pvreant."
Thr Public safety commission recommendations are included here for
your Lnformat ion only. They will be forwerdrd to the City Council
along with thr racommandation of the Planning Commission.
IV. P~aNNING COMMIS<ION RBVIBN: The Planning Commie ice hu already
dUcaued this issue on several occe ions. In then discussions, aLo
Lnvolvlnq the rspwentative of the recreational vehicle group, the
Sues was narrowed down to privets residential properties only; public
strsat parking i• not an issue at this time.
Staff wu raqussted to look Lnto specific items, to ue if there L• a
wsy to relax the sxisi inq rtatrict ions while malntalning a resonable
dagre of control and at the acme time suers that tM ordinance can
ba applies equ Stably.
Ths Mama staff was requested to examine included maLnGnance Lauu,
timing rutrlctions, 9randfathsrlnq, and considerK ion of dwelopinq
different standards for different types o[ vehicles. It was •lso
noted that the Public Sa[ety CommLsion'• ncoamendation should ba
considered before the Planning commiuion tinalhed its recommendation
to the City council.
4atxTENI~NC6 Ip5 06Sx The long term general maLnteninCe oL •11 Clty
neighborhoods i• tautly • question of public heath, etety, and
welfare. Tni^ Lncludes adequate eintenece of structures, yards,
parkways, and itmos stored Ln public view, includlnq recrutional
vehicle.
The pre-1988 ordlnanca dullnq wish RV's n1Ud on vehicl. maintuanes
provisions to promou public heath, egty, and welfare goals.
Unfortunately, the ordinance we ineffective, in that it we only abl.
to del with the most flagsant vioLtione. The Code 6nforeement
office received many calla tram ruldents objecting to the parking o[
racrutional vehicles !n their elghborhood. However, many of the
vehicle reported a being Ln poor condition did not constitute
c Uar violation under the ordinance) therefore, the City could eat
torte tnelr removel.
By necueity, all malnbnance nqu lramenU tend to be subjective.
Itsma ouch a ilaC ties and inoperative, unllcenud vehicles are usy
to idetify. However, the ghat majority of malntenanee eau era in
a margind eondltion and subject to lntsrprNat ion and value judgmsner
white do not stand legal scrutiny. Tres community, and Coda
Bntorcement start In the field, must have • ele-r and •arily
axplainaDL ut of rule to work with to be •ftectSve.
/off ~'~
PLANNING COMMIEEZON STAFF REPORT
RV STOAAG6 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA
nay 22, 1991
Paqa 3
VI. TIME LZMZTS: Existing ngu Tat ion/ doling with ALL vehicles )not just
RV's) distinguish between "storage," which L coneidared psrmavnt,
and "parkingr" which is considered to be of a temporary, non-
continuous nature.
Current regulation/ prohibit all ^siorege^ in resident lal front yartl
area/; NO vshicLs (ot other item/ sorb •/ equipment, material, ate.)
may be permanently stored in front ysid/.
Pao/nger vehicles ate annsldered ^Kond^ after five wnescutiw days
of earl Lnuous parking. Reereae Tonal vMiel requltlons ar+ currently
more restrictive: RV'• ar/ coNidered ^etosed^ a[tec only Z4 hour/ o[
continuous parking.
One of the rusona for LAe five-day 1Lolt on puesnger vehicles is
that vehicles which ar/ In continual uu ar/ by nwosity in op/retlnq
condition and are rusonaDly well maintained. Ales, vehicles that are
moved often cannot •ccumulata debrl sround and und/r iham.
By contrut, vehicles which ar/ permanently /toted do not necessitata
continual maiMUancet dust and debrl usily accumulate, weeds and
loves become mon difficult to control, and a conscientious atfort by
the awn/c L rage lssd to maintain the vehicl/ and its lmm/diata
surroundinga in adequata condition. In staff'/ expsrLnc/, • large
proportion of v/hiclas currently stored Ln violation of the fiv/-day
limit are alo a malntananee problem. The rim/ limit provides
tangible and enforceable Cool to dui with puesngar vehicle
maintanance problems.
Slmil•r considerations apply to other vehicle, including RV's.
However, from a maintanane/ persp/etiw, there is no advantaq/ Sn
keeping the RV regulations mon n/trictive than r/qu Tat SoN for other
vMlele/.
ModitlcaLions to the esiatinq ordinance could M made to eliminate th/
distinction Wtwesn AV's and other vehicles, and apply • five-day
parking limit to both. Ths net result would M that reerutlonal
vehicles would not W considered "stored" until aftar flue drys of
wet lnuoue parking, an4 regulations doling aith •stotage^ would not
kick in until that point. This would give the RV owner additional
flexibility, without impairing ihs City's ability to swtain • high
level of malntenanee Ln its nslghborhoods.
VII. GAANOPATHERINGt "CrandfatMrlnq' 1^ • means to uLSb1Uh a lq•1
right to contino an activity which L no longer permitted Dy current
nqulatlons.
9tatf wu nquuied to lnvutlgaq tM poesibillty of •qund[atMrinq^
pre-existing teerestional vehicle. This would allow recrutio nal
vehicle which had bon stored Ln front yard) prior to the adoption of
carrot nqulatlons to cone inue to be stored In the front yards.
/03 ~aZ
PLANNING COMl1I SSION STAFF REPORT
RV STOMGE - CITY OF IUNCHO CVCAHONGA
Nay Z2, 1991
Pa9a a
Thera are uveral Lgal and practical problems with thin approach:
Plret, the non-conforming (or "geandfatherinq^) clww Ls normally
used to permit the continuation of setivitiea which have been Ugally
Htabliahed in the first plat.. As new law. are adopted, pre-existing
but legally aateblished wtivitiu era "grandfnthared in^ and allowed
to continue.
Tha pre-1988 ordinance did not permit storage of RV's in the front
yard. without re eerier Lone. Anther, the ttorage of RV's Ln the front
yards wan parmittatl in a vary limited am (between eM drLvway and
the nprut aide property line). Thus, many of the RV's which d0 not
meet today'. requLtione would aLO violate the pre-axLtinq ordinance
and could not ba "grandtathared."
Second, tMra L no practical way to detemine whether • vehicle hu
been stored in a 91ven location since 6atore tM data o! the
ordinance. This means that new storage locations could W utabliahed
in violation of tAa new Ordinance with no way of enforcement. The
only solution to thin 1e to "grand[ather" ~] RV's elorad today (in
violation of Doih the pre-1988 ordinanq and current regulation.).
Third, there 1e a question of equitable application of city
requlationa. It exist inq vMicUe are "qundtathered" and permitted
to ba stored in front yards, Dut neLghbon who complied with currant
requlatione era not permitted to uu Chair property in like manner,
problems 1n enforewnt are vary likely to develop.
Given theme eoneideratione, staff dwn not wnsider ^gnndtatherinq^ a
practical option for addreuinq this lean..
VIII, STANDARDS BY TYpE O} VEHICLis The Co®iu ion ankad neztt to examine
wMeher etornge standards could W developed by tM type of vehicle,
considering the type of peoblem which may a usoc iated with each
type.
The lollowinq .Cult ications npgwnt !M types of vehlclu coamonly
[ound in resldmtinl neighborhood. Ln this cos®unitys
Van Conversion
Chassis Mounted Camper
Houuear - 38-~0 feat
Converted tue
/a~{ ~'~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
AV STORAG¢ - CITY OF RANCXO CUCAMONGA
May 22, 1991
Page 5
TRAILERS
Vtility/Plat Bad Trei ler
Spscisl Purpose Trailer
Box/Enclosed Tzaller
Cemping/Toot Troller
Hnrae/stock Trailer
Noute Trailer 12-35 fact
Fifth Wheel Trails[ 20-40 fat
MATS fTRaILEec,
Row Boat
open Boat (Trailer) 12-20 feet
Sall Bont (Trailer) 10-35 Cut
Cabin Cruiser (TUiler) 16-35 fact
xouseDOat (Trailer) 20-39 tut
C`uPeRB/ awP6R averr
Vnmoun4d Shell (Portable)
Vnmounead Camper
Camper (Mounted On Pick-up)
MOTORCYC*.6 / ~ T6 wIN t NS I R ,
Motorcycle/Girt elks (Not Street Legal)
All Terrain Vehicle (3-whirl, 4-wMel, Not Strut Legal)
Moped/Motorized BicyeL (Strut Legal)
Motorcycle (Stret Legal)
OPP-ROAD VEHICL69 INOT STAS6T
Dune Buggy
off-Road VohicU (deep, Truck, VM, etc.)
Off-Road Raee Whicle
Road Race Car
Although tMre an • large number of raereational vehicle types,
po4ntial problems auociated wlih nch are •lmllar in nature. TM
Public Balety Commluion had looked a! ehle option from tM
perspsctiw of ufety and agreed that there as rally duet two groups
of rseretional vehicLs:
3. 9s1f-eontalned, wlf-propelled, and fully ucured vehlc La
ouch a motor homes, houq cars, and campmr• on truckU and
2. All otMrsJ such as boat, trallen, oft-road vehicle, sec.
Prom tAe point of vlew oC elntenance and land uu, • •lmilar
d lselnetion can M drawn a well. Vehicle which can W drlwn and
era licenud Co M operated on public atrub require • suDRGnt lei
degru o[ maintenance and ass cuter to control.
las ~,¢
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RV STORAGB - CITY OP PANCHO CUCAMONCA
May 7P, 1991
Page 6
Should the Commiulon desire to modify the existing ordinnncs to
permit the atoraga of certain types of recreational vehicles in the
front yards, staff suggests that only calf-contained, calf-pcopellad,
and licanud vehiclu be permitted in front yard area.
IX. AVAILANLB OPTIONS: There era a number of policy options availaD la for
consideration. The Daeic choices era:
1. BEEP E%ISTING OROTNANCB AS I9. This could coniLnus to p[ohibit RV
parking In front yarn and driveways for Hare than Z6 hours.
2. KEEP EX ISTINO OAD INANCE, BUT RELA% TIME LIMITS. This option would
keep •%iatinq zutrLCi ions on "storage" of RV's, but extend GM
period during which RV'• may W "parlud^ in front yard area io
five days (or other appropriate 1Lmit ~.
3. RBVT36 ORDINANCE TO PEANIT tAONT YA[ID STORAGE Ot SEL!-CONTAINED
AND SELL-PROPELLED VEHICL89 ONLY. This would Hu the
tartlet ions on motor homes and •Lmilar vehiclu, but continu the
current ruezietlon• for boats, trallan, and other vMicUa u
noted in the report.
0. REVISE ORDINANCE TO PERMIT tRONT YARD STORAGE Op ALL RECREATIONAL
VEHICLES. Thla option would permit Ue storage of all
ncrutLonal vahlclo In tM [root yard arp saDject to
maintenance requLtions.
X. $ECON!@NDATION: it i• recommended Chat the Camiluion again obtain
public input on thug Leuu and eittur:
1. Cirsct etatf to prepare appropdaN chanqu to the text of the
ordinance, or
2. lorwerd lt• policy recomnx+ndatlon to the City Council for
along with tM pcrnmendation of the Public 9abty
Attachmenis~ Exhibit "A" - PLnninq Caemiuion Eta[f Report dated
Junin Z7, 1990
Ezhiblt ^e" - Ordinance No. 360
Bxhlbit "C" - summary of Surroundlnq Citiu' RequLtiona
/~~ ~,~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991 -
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Millie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF REIO AVENUE - A request to vacate Reid Avenue,
orate soot o n treet and east of Archibald Avenue
RECOMIENDAT[ON
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Lhe attached resolution ordering
the summary vacation of Reid Avenue, south of Main Street and east of
Archibald Avenue.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On February 13, 1991, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map
13800 per Resolution No. 91-20 located on the southeast corner of Main Street
and Reid Avenue. One of the conditions of approval of the parcel map is a
request to vacate Reid Avenue, south of Main Street and west of the proiect
site. This would result in a portion of Reid Avenue becoming a part of the
parcel map and a portion becoming a part of the parcel to the west.
The sub,lect street right-of-way vacation 1s approximateiy 60-feet wide and
170-feet long, see attached Exhibits "A" and "B". The subject proposed
vacation 1s unimproved and not necessary for access.
The Planning Commission on February 13, 1991, has determined that said
vacation would conform to the General Plan and recommended the vacation
occur. Section 8333a of the Streets and Highways Code states that local
agencies may sumnarlly vacate (by resolution) public service easements if the
easement has not been used for the purpose for which 1t was dedicated or
acquired for five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed
vacation.
Respectfully sub fled, J p ~ ,~
7f"~~'`~
Nm. Joe O'Neil / '
City Engineer U
NJO:WV:dlw
Attachments
~7
RESOLUTION N0. 9/. 3/~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
REID AVENUE
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and
Highway Code, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized
to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly
described; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that Reid
Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes
because the said street has not been used for the purpose for which it was
dedicated or adqulred for flue consecutive years.
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the Ctty Council of the Ctty of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby ma ek s~ order vacating that portion of street as shown on Map V-066,
on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which
has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto,
marked Exhibit "A', and by reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: That the subJect vacation shall be subJect to the
reservations oTr sanitary sewer purposes as described in attached Exhibit "A".
SECTION 3: That frmn and after the date the resolution 1s recorded,
said por on o he City street no longer constitutes a street or public
easement.
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
resolution o e recorded 1n the office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
adoption QECT-f I-~N-~resolutlon,heanditltCshall sthereuponitakeoeffectpandgbealn
force.
(Og
Exxlalr A
THAT PORTION OF THE WEST CUCAMONGA TRACT AS RECORDED IN MAP
BOOK 13, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFOkNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 24, BLOCK 10 OF SAID
TRACT, SAID POINT ALSO HEiNG THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE WEST PARALLEL VITH THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK
9 OF SAID TRACT:
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EASTERLY LINfi OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE
OF 170.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1:
THENGfi EAST ALONG THE PROLONGATIDN OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID
LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHVEST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 26:
THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
RESERVING TO CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRTICT A 15 FOOT WIDE
EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
SAID 15 FOOT EASEMENT BEING PARALLEL WITH AND LY3NG lU FEET
WESTERLY AND 5 FEfiT EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DFSCRIHED LINE:
COMMENCING ON THE CENTERLINE OF REID AVENUE AND THE WESTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MAIN STRfiET;
THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF
3.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
<1>
THENCE S 5° 47' 26" E A DISTANCE OF 170. H7 FEET MORE OR LESS TO
THE POINT OF TERMINUS ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 10. s"A1D
POINT BEING EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 21.17 FEET
FkOM THE CENTERLINE OF REID AVENUE.
SI UE LINES OF SA1D EASEMENT TO HE EXTENDED OR SHORTENED TO
TERMI NATH ON EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES,
SEE EXHIBIT H
(2
"EXHIBIT 8"
J ~ L
,c MA/N
-
_ _
Q
STREET
_ n
n
o
~ r-
n
EAST 60.00
25 25 393 25 25 25
EAST
30 30
160
2 I ' 0 24 23 22
o ~
o
n I ~
r
-
m _
IS Sewer easement
o
C
SCALE -~1-,~~=40~
~ BLOCK 10
BLOCK 9 ~
~
W
~~ a
l
x
r a
z o
z
x
~ 10
a
0 5~
z
25 23 E45T 60,00 25 25 25
EAST
21.17 ~' F"'C
Ff.
~, ~~ .r ri
o
n `~
~
~~
A.T. Q S.F. RA/LROAO ~~ ~•°: -'^~
~---- - ~r,EXP G-~6.1p *~~
Fr, r
~/
\ -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Oct obey 16, 1991
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~`J4
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an
appeal of the Planning Coimiss ion's decision to re wke Conditional
Use Permit 78-03 Eor the operation of a bar in conjunction with a
[eatautant located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620
Carnelian Street, northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets -
APN: 201-811-66 through 60.
CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT 70-03 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an
appeal of the Planning Coi®ission's decision to deny the request
to extend the hours of operation and amend the Condition of
Approval prohi6itinq live entertainment for an existing reataurant
and bar located in the Neighborhood Covmercial District at 6620
Carnelian Street, northweat corner of 19th and Carnelian Streeta -
APN: 201-811-56 through 60.
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an
appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request
to conduct live entertainment in conjunction with a restaurant and
bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial Diatri et at 6620
Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets -
APN: 201-811-56 through 60.
On Octobet e, 1991, staff received a letter From the applicant requesting a
continuance of the above-dea cribed items. The to as on is that he will not be
available to attend this meeting lase attached October 8, 1991 letter from
Mr. John Mannerino). Staff recommends that the CSty Council continue the
above items to the November 20, 1991 regular meeting.
City
BB:NF ap
Attachment: Applicant's letter of October 8, 1991
d
FRlX1: DEgIJly9 T0~ 7149576499 DCT 9. 1991 1O:01RM P,02
MAIVINERINO
BRIGUGLI~
i • w o r r i
JOHN D. MANNERINO
6Al FflI000li0
(7741987-6499
VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
October 9, 1991
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City Clerk's Office
' Attention: Debbie Adams
10500 Civic Center prive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9t73O
. ~ Re: Conditional Use Permit 78-03 / Sam's Place
Dear Ms. Adams
In~light of the current status of the calendars of both the
City Council and myself, attorney for the Pellegrino's, we
respectfully request a continuance of .the appaal hearing,to
November 20, 7991.- Rindly indicate~to my office whether this
date is accepeable.
?hanky for your continued cooperation in this mncter. •
Very r ly/ yvuza,
MANNE 6 TGU 0
w
sya o n Ma e~ no
cc: \ S
' ~ ~~
BJ07 BABE lINF ACRD, SUITE 1101 NANGNO CUCAMONDA, CA 917001TEL (71q 960.11001FA%(H t19/1~84t0. .
CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager n
FROM: Brad Bul.le r, City Planner `lrJ1
BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician
BUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESBMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91 O1 CITY OF
RANCHO cUCAMONGA - A ragas et to emend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the
Rancho Cuc amonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking spaces and
reduce the standard size Dorking apace to 8 I/2 feet by 1E feet. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ABBEBBMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A request to amend Part III Of the
Indu eirial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking epacee. Sta Ff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of this Development
Code Amendment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment. If the Council concurs,
the attached Ordinances should be adopted.
BACKGROUND: In February 1991, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare
a Development Code and Indu atrial Specific Plan Amendment to eliminate 8-foot by
16-foot "compact" parking epacee. On April 10, 1991, the Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on this matter. eacauee of issues raised by several
developers, the Planning Commission held a workshop on June 20, 1991, to diecasa
possible alternatives. Based on information eubm fitted to the Planning
commies ion, and the workshop, a proposal was advanced to change the existing 9-
Eoot by 19-foot "et andard" size parking apace to an E 1/2-foot by IR-foot
"et andard" parking apace. At the August 28, 1991, Planning Commission meeting,
the Planning Commies ion approved the Aeeolutione recommending adoption of the
attached Ordinances creating a "one-size-Fite-all^ parking apace of 8 1/2-feet by
16-feet.
Attached are the Planning commies ion staff reports and minutes from the August
26, 1991, meeting and the June 20, 1991, workshop, containing more detailed
information.
lly
City P1,6nner
Attachment e: Exhibit "A"- Augu et 28, 1991, Planning commieaion Staff Report
(inc lades June 20, 1991, Workshop Report and Minutest
Exhibit "B" - Augu et 28 and August la, 1491, Planning Comm is aion
Minutes
Planning Commission Reao lu[ione 91-122 and 91-123
City Council ordinance for DCA 91-01
C i[y Council Ordinance Ear IBPA 91-01
U1x Vr rtA.vl nv ll. 1, :].vlV.v v.'.
STAFF REPORT
(~~lr -
DAT.E: August 2HJ 1991 v
T0: Chairman and Memb erg of the Pla nninq Coamission
FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner
BY: Hruce Huckin gham, Planning Technician
SUBJECT: ENVIRIXiMENTAL AS3ESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request t0 amend Title 17,
Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho cu camonga Municipal Code to
eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from August 14, 1991.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSS33MENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-8 1 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend Pnrt III of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends issuance
of a Nagati ve Declaration. ICOntinued From August 14, 1991.)
These items were continued to the August 2S, 1991 Planning Commission
meeting in order to amend the Resolution. Attached Ss a copy of the
August 14, 1991 staff report.
Respe ly su ted
(l/
/`
/ Brad Ler
City Planner
HB:HB/jfs
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Auquet 14, 1991 Staff Report
P le nning Co®igaion Resolution fot DCA 91-01
City Council Ordinance for DCA 91-01
Planning Commission Resolution for ISPA 91-01
City Council Ordinance Eor ISPA 91-01
~ ~~ FXlilsl7 f}
ulI yr ls~,.~~n~ ~t~:+.av.v ~.,~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 14, 1991
T0: Chairman and Membets of the PLa nning Commission
FRDM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician
~~
a
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01
- CITY OF PANCND CUCAMDNGA - A request to amend Title 17,
Chapter 17.12 of the Aancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to
eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 20, 1991.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01 - CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend Part III of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 26, 1991.)
ABSTRACT: This report presents amendments to the Development Code and
Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking standards by
creating a standard size space of 8 1/2 feet by 18 feet.
SAC KGROUND: The City's current parking raga lotions provide for two
sizes of parking spaces: a 9-foot by 19-foot "Standard" space and an
8-foot by 16-foot "Compact" space. According to the De velopmeni Code,
all developments (existing oz proposed) whicR have 25 or more parking
spaces m~ devote up to 35 percent of its total parking [o compact
spaces. Further, the Industrial Specific Plan requires that 20-35
percent of all parking spaces shall be compact size. On April 10, 1991,
the Planning Commission heard public testimony regarding the City's
proposed Development Code and Industrial Specific PLan amendments to
eliminate compact parking spaces and use only 9-foot by 19-foot standard
spaces. Subsequently, the Planning Commission held a workshop on
June 20, 1991, to discuss aLiernetivas to this proposal. It was the
concensus of the Planning Conmisaionere that attended that an 8 1/2-foot
by 18-foot parking space would be adequate to accommodate Ne majorrty
of automobiles. The attached Staff Reports and MLnutes provide detailed
analysis concerning this issue.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has comp le [ed Parts I and II of the Initial
Study and did not idenerfy any adverse environmental impacts which could
result From this amendment. Therefore, the rssuance of a Negative
Dec laratron is recommended.
I I /
PLANNING CGM.MI BSION STAFF PEPORT
OCA 91-01 G ISPA 91-01 - CITY OF R.C.
August 14, 1991
Pe ge 2
CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised as public hearings on
an 1%a page ad in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.
RECOMMENOAT IDN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the
attached Resolutions recommending approval of the Development Code and
Industrial Specific Plan amendments to eliminate compact spaces and
down-size the standard space to a feet, 6 inches by 1B feet to the City
Council.
Respe y subm
Hcad er
City Tanner
SB:BB/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Workshop Sieff Report
and Minuted dated June 20, 1991
Exhibit "E" - Existing Development Code Parking
Regulations
Exhibit "C" - Existing Industrial Specific elan Parking
Regulations
Reso lutlon Recommending Approval of DCA 91-01
City Council Ordinance Eor DCA91-01
Resolution Recommending Approval of ISPA 91-01
City Council Ordinance foY IBPA91-01
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1991
TO: Chairman and Membezs of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician
SUBJECT: PLANNING CO MiI55 LON WORKSHOP ON COMPACT PARKING
A. ABSTPACT: The purpose of tonight's workshop is to review the data
and alternatives regarding compact parking.
B. BAC XGROUND: On April 10, 1991, the Planning Commission heard
public testimony regarding the City's proposed Development Code and
Industrial Specific Plan Amendments to eliminate compact parking
spaces. At the request of several developers and the Panc ho
Cucamonga Chamber of Cov®erce, the Planning Commies ion gave the
parties the opportunity to submit possible alternatives on or
before May 15~, 1991. The Planning Commission then agreed to hold a
subsequent workshop to discuss these alternatives further.
.,. SUMMARY OF SUBMITTED DATA: Lewis Homes Management Corporation,
Hughes Investment and the Economic Development Comllttee of the
Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce have jointly submitted several ~
stuoies and articles regarding parking, which were previously
distributed. Based on this information, they have concluded the
following:
o Approximately 80 percent of all care currently in use are 5'
9" wide x 15' 7" long or Lesa. These are defined as small to
mid-size cars.
o Approximately 20 percent of all cars ate "large cars." Moat
of which (85 percent of this category) are no large- than 6'
i" wide x 17' 2" long.
o Pazkiny space widths are generally determined by adding 21"
Enr long term parking and 20" for high tum-over parking
areas. The most commonly used is 26".
n Parking space Lengths are generally determined by adding 6" to
9" to the length. The most commonly used is 9".
PLANNING COMMISSION STAR. :PORT
WORKSHOP ON COMPACT PARKING
June 20, 1991
Page 2
Therefore, they conclude that approximately 97 percent (i.e.,
BO percent + (20 percent by 85 pert ent ~) of all vehicles on the
road today could fit into a parking space 8' S" wide (6' 1" plus
28") x 17' 11" long (17' 2" plus 9"). Thus, they propose a '
size fits a11" pa long space of e' 6" w'd by 18' 1 g. (The above
conclusions are based on Exhr br is "A"-"D" and Attachments 3, 4, 5,
and 8.)
To Eu rther support the parking space alternative of e' 6"
wide x 78' long, a survey was conducted to determine vehicle size
in multi-family residential projects within six apartment complexes
within Terra Vista. The information was based on lease/rental
applications of existing tenants.
TABLE 1
CONFIRMED POSSIBLY'
6.1" wide x 17'2^ long oversize
or smaller
Evergreen Apts. 96B qg
Mountainview Apts. 9q0
6B
Par kview Place Apts. 978 38
Sycamore Terrace Apts. 908 109
Montecito Apts. qqp
68
Del Mar Apts. 934 79
• Due to the lack of specific vehicle descriptions for trucks and
vans (i.e., "ford truck") the possibly over-sized percentage
represents all vehicles over 6' 1" wide x 17' 2" long and all
vehicles in which the size could not be determined.
Lewis Nomes concluded that residents who park foc the entire day
and/or night are more likely to take the time to park in the
appropriate parking space since they are familiar with the parking
arrangements. Therefore, they feel that the proposed alternative
parking space of e' 6" x 18' long in a commercial setting applies
even stronger to residential projects.
A second survey was performed by Kunzman Aaeocia tes to determine
the percentage of the small/medium (5' 9" x 15' 7" or lessl, large
(6' 1" x 17 1/2" or less) and oversized vehicles in commercial
centers within the City. The survey was conducted at the following
times: Thursday, May 23, 1991, 12 noon to 3;00 p.m. (a 11 sites),
Thursday, May 2J, 1991, 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (sites 1 and 3), and
Saturday, May 25, 1991, 12 noon to 3:00 p.m. (all sites). The
following table provides a summary of vehicle sizes at the four
centers:
il9
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF .PORT
WORKSHOP ON COMPA.^.T PARMING
June 20, 1991
Page 3
TABLE II
Vehicles
Small/
Sites Medium Large Oversize Motorcycle Tota'_s
Lucky Centet 518 BO 8 3 609
Sunrise Center 284 01 15 1 381
Terra Vista 1,017 194 5 8 1,224
Village
Terra Vista 997 216 5 1 1,219
Town Center _ -
'POTALS 2,816 571 33 13 3,433
They concluded only 1 percent of vehicles were larger than 6' 1"
wide x 17' 2" long. Therefore, based on this survey, Rancho Cucamonga
does not appear to have a greater number of oversized vehicles than the
national average.
D. ANALYSTS:
1. one size Eits all. The benefits of a "one size fits all"
packing space are as follows:
o Site planning is simplified. Dilemmas such as where to
locate compact parking spaces are eliminated.
o Conf Lices are minimized. over 90 percent of care/trucks
will be accownodated•
o Availability will 6e equal for all vehicles. There will
be no segregation based on vehicle size.
The disadvantages are that there will be lees room to maneuver
vehicles into/out of stalls, less room to open car doors, and less
room for shopping carts. This will also exacerbate the problem of
over-size vehicles protruding into circulation aisles.
2. Parking space width and Length. The space between cars for
high T.utn over aeeas of 28'• in width and 9" in length appears
to be commonly used among several parking sxperts. However,
no scientif is data was submitted to substantiate these
numbers. In addition, Wane of the information submitted is
based on driver preference for ease of perking.
3. Aces used for parking. The issue of parking area has been
discussed in the past. The Following table provides a
breakdown of the total square footage for 100 parking Fpaces
assuming landscaping and ais Le size ace fixed:
/~~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PORT
WORI(SHOP ON COMPACT 2ARRLNm
June 20, 1991
Page 4
TABLE III
Stall Size Tot a1 Square Fo otage
B.5' x 18' 15,300
9' x 18' 16,200
9' x 19' 17,100
e' x 16' (208) + 9' x 19' (809) 16,240
e' x 16' (358) + 9' x 19' (658) 15,595
Simply eliminating compact parking altogether would increase
the size of parking lots (assuming building area remained the
same). Whereas, the proposed 8.5' x 18' parking space would
decrease the size of parking lots.
It does not appear based on Table III that a larger parking
area would be necessary when compared to the current standards
using a mix of 65 percent standard and 35 percent compact
spaces.
4. Are cars oe trio s 11 /1 ger7 Based on data submitted
(Exhibies '•A'• and "C"), the percentage of small cars
(classes 5-7) sold in each class has remained arable from 1980
[0 1988 while the percentage of large cars (classes 8-11) sold
in each class has shifted. Vehicles in classes 8 and 9 have
increased, subsequently shrinking sales from classes 10 and 11
(over-sized vehicles). These vehicles (classes 10 and 11)
accounted for less then 7 percent of auto sales in 1988.
Though it seems these over-sized vehic Les will always have a
smail segment of the market, the general trend is that
vehicles are being down-sized.
5. Parking Space Sizes in other C't' The following cities
have adopted the 8.6' wide x 18' long .parking stall: Anaheim,
Oceanside, Santa Ana, Long Beach, Escondido and Los Angeles.
Exhibit •'E 1-2" also lists several Local cities and their
current standards. Based nn this information, there appears
to be no consensus as to what parking size works best.
E. OPTIONS: The Planning Commission may wish to consider the
following alternatives to a complete elimination o£ compact parking
spaces City wide:
1. Reduce the maximum percentage of allowable compact spaces.
2• Allow compart spaces only for larger employers in the
industrial area which require over 100 spaces. The allowable
perce ntage could remain up to 35 percent pr reduced to a
smaller percentage. This could he considered since employees
coming to work every day are more Familiar with the parking
arrangement; whereas, cu stoma rs frequenting a commercial
ra r
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF .PORT
WOR%SHOP ON COMPACT PARKING
June I0, 1991
Paqe 5
center are unfamiliar with the locations of thn. appropriate
parking stalls. Fuzther, employees who park for the entire
day are more likely to take the time to park in the
appropriate size parking space.
3. Do not allow compact parking spaces to satisfy minimum parking
requirements for the use• In other words, compact spaces
could only be provided in addition to those spaces required by
Code.
4. Down-size parking spaces to a universal size of H.5' wide x
1H' long.
5. Down-size parking spaces to a universal size of 9' wide x 78'
long.
Respect ~ ly s fitted,
C
/ Hr 11
City Planner
BH:BH:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Classification of Vehicle Signs
Exhibit "H" - Annual Automotive Sales
Exhibit "C" - Annual Automotive Salee by Class
Exhibit "D" - Deai gn Vehicles Annual Sales
Exhibit "E" - Parkinq Sta11 Size Survey
~d
The founda0on upon wtdch this disaasbn of
paAdrt99eometrics iabased Iathe deAnidon c~ta smaACar
M comparison to the standard or large car.
For purposes al Oda report, and ro aatabAsh a
urdfonn and raadlh adaptable tanninobpy. all automo-
bdes and AOht trucks wiA ba grouped iMO two Classes -
smaAand large. Thk basic nomenclature is itrteMed to
a~+veh Ore process of vehida dassufcation and subse-
quent parldnp fauAty aeatpn.
lc'xtartshh conalderatlon hat boon piwn to the
tdaaiAeetlon of aura mobiNt and rata irudn aomrr9rp to
theb footprkrt • lha ytound area eovarad by astir vNdde
basadon IarrpthllmeswldOt axpraasadlntanna of aquae
kk (SF) or aquae metaq (SM). TM sysbm Isadt to
asei0rtment of rref tidae to orp of tarvan dutas, based on
the vaNde area in maters. BerJUa tea attwAeat cars
eowranareaano lastthansmatata,tfaanraAaatciaa
seCr•Safj. LAurwlse,thahtgaatvahkdgatainClagll.
SMALL ~ '
Gast S - 6.00 to 6.99 SM 63.82 to 64.67 SF
Clara 8 - 6.00 t0 6.99 8M 84.66 9a 76.34 8F
Cbgt 7. 7.0010 7.98 SM 76.35 b 86.10 8F
WitiECJ1R8
Cfaaa 6 - 6.00 10 6.90 SM 66.11 b 68.76 8F
twos 9 - 9.00 b 9,99 8M 96.7710107.63 8F
CWs 10 -10.00 to10.99 8M 107.64101.16.99 SR
C1Ya 11 - 11.00 1011.99 61A 116.40 ib 129.06 SF
-- SM . 8quoa Maters
9F . S4+s'6 Feats
aruspttl rtcu
/~...3 rc.~a.~st~°° ca.
aarratr .
~uau~t, 1969p a~tiootl
larklea V~xLtioo/
tatklaa Coorulhou Council
One source has charred -..irtl carrlarea car sofoa
In each calendar year sins 1870, based on a boundary
Of14'•it~xS-9'batvwansmagarplerpsearsm Small
nr sales bounced around In a range between i 4Y• and
~% from 1973 to 1>i7a, ds shown in Figure E A steady
dsa in smatl car sales oocurted through 1981, stabilising
then. with an average of 52'h sma8 cars sold each year
from 1983 thru 1988. Usirp data from H.L PoOt Cam•
pony an vehitle registra8ans, 8tls same reference estl-
mates thffi at% a< the vehidea an the toad as of
January 1,1989 are 14'-11' x S•T a smaUa-. Presum-
ing that the pereentage of smog care soW ead+ yur
remains ge n erally ataWe, the percentage of ama6 cars on
the road wi8 corsinue to increase ffi an ssdmffied rats of
aboul2%peryaer.
Annual Automobtlo Solos
ear
sa
oa
era
~~ ~^
I9s
m
ut•
roe
aw ~t w w• ~.. ~.. va rt ,a• iw w. ~w ua ~ r r• tra ,r ar
btwaYr Yaw
• ~Ydrrrw•arr.u,aN~ar IMI'
FlQun H
aearytM twat
"^ata•~andtl .4fd•rSna• for
!atlisa C•arerica^
Mtawc, 19x9; e.ciooal
® DI2 ^ larkiaa DaaoeLtlon/P•rklo
Conaultaau Cowell
++~1--1-F--F++~-1- - -~- - -F-+
1~ 1 1-I I I- I I- I I 1 1 1 I
7'f't't-i'?'1-t"I 1'7-1-t-I-t~-t° 7
~-I-~1--JJJ _ L11~-I-.a--I 1J--~.-IL-1-~-1J-1~-f-a-
T'1 T~f-1'T f T 1~"If~rT'I~l~~f f
+~-t-t-t--rtt -r-+-rt-I-t--r-t-+
~ ~-~- ~-i-1 ~'J_L1..L1J_L1_L1
T f' -F-~-F-{--,~I-Ir-~-ir-~-~-1-~-H~•
o~ each pttassrgts7 a. tttudsl ea reaonetl by
AutomoUw Nawe ants , 980 have bean tabulated by
the deasee prevlousy defined (FIWro Fj. Ctaga 10 and
Class t1 vehkies, xdriGt are yanera0y Duty iT-e' fn
length and 8'~6' in width. have declined from as much as
14N. of annual sales in 1902, to 77. oftFw market in 1988.
ANKJAL AUTO SALE9 BY CU49S
9adCaCWssu IarpeprtXewei lt..~tR
• 7 a.rr;
eUrYl Il trod
LiatNl ~'~
Yt t t • p
1nb 17,w1 srrtlnn 7<.w11a71 IAILIp ta1S,Iw LIMO Ipasw 71Aw M141w 'et0.01•
OIIL 7D.Yt D.9!!i eL711 felt Ill[ 17~t :..ii
twt 0.171 a.Mt,7et Llnn.7nt 1117,„n 1.1MiM taftw wa,9r p.Ni ~w7ap }7o0aw
ent als Is.n a n +~ wws
Isle Ig1os wtasr tw.ut satastn taoso7 tAtuss usaas wswt >ls7aem 7Jlstm
sts su/ saw rx tsst lava tas sut ". ~•...
Isa n,7w tatsss saLS/s /..assn ,arsv tastpt t~tsas7 was /nawt *ttvst
ast mrl aw /sty r test t47t ns :,r.
Iw taa+ ar+.lts asasu smael t,wm Lists tavm sows wt.m tttasas
taw afa+c taw lent sow tasty ~-
teY w.as tpaans 47X471 awts0 itsaw7 Lnlastl tnaYt 117aw 6w0.aw 1tplLiq
[let NJt Il1'4 M7% Lt17 Ia77<
Is t.+at: Ipls,IS o4am tut7ns71 Llsswl tanLS/ s7sau ta7.7s ssaas n,sw,tw
t.7t >ssx n >x ew xw to Ilea
Ir7 +Ia1tn +,Iwan I/ro4w sswal7 aosaw Is1,7w a7aw /waw ..wt7s waam
to nx wat t7c tAt- a•:.
Is m.7w tssps sw.w /lMw s7aa7 etas sa7n llt,tw usao l!R~
tat t.It sls+- tnst Xt1t 74nt a7ta sty 4fA .:,., . '
Flaw F
~~~./~Ayha~s~riyo~bJearn np~oMyyd t~ha~ysw.a~n}fyJapana~aya
mur71ao07raral7t0andtn prodYlca r~_~r~Pw~.fl~ea~~YA
M1>t{ W11R t'tcWWaT. tlta proposed hrpa JaPa77asa ca7a
rN0 t7a1 a Mae lion 6'tc 1T, w17bh wotdd pha tlwm M
Claaa 1L
OUIM Mva 77otad U7e ma7bd 17ICraaN M tiQlq
truck, van. and utl~r va171CN sales, and 1M 177etaaWr~
ua of Cass vshldaa fn swrydq psrwnal ttanapoti
Thsa vshkdq have not bssn Included to the Paa-
asngsrCar t3h7dY (Flpun ~
IscssPtd troal
°4eatrd~d LLidultwu [or
1 ~ 5 [nrklloa Gat~triC•' luaus[
19N7 artloatl ltrkina'Aaso
®II C T4it[SOa Coosultauu Couoeil
inastudyoftannualvehiclesa the85thpxcan-
tife vehicle artlcnp Classes 5 to 7 has been stable since
1980 at 14'-8•x5'-8', Similartoa 1885 FordTorttpo.while
the 85th perCemile vehicle among Classes 8 to 11 has
declined from 18'•2' x 5.5'to 1T•r x 6'-1• (Fgure H).
tNhile this data does not include pre-t980 model ve-
codes, it is reasonaby Consistent with previous studies.
'fhe previausy referenced study m which used vehicle
registrations nationwide as otJamlary 1,1983, found the
85th pereemile vehielesto be 14'-8' x S-T for small cars
and 18'•4" x 8'-T for large cars.
The design vehicles for the national mix of auto-
mobiies on the road as of January 1, 1989, have been
conservativey estimated to be as follows:
Small Cars 14'-8• x 5'-8'
Large Cars 18'•0' x 6'-8'
K is (meresting to note that, during this period
(1983.1988), the design vehicle for small Cars has re-
mainedquite stable, but that the design vehicle for large
cars has declined, espeaaly in length.
OESIt3N VEHICIFS aY CALFN~AR YFJtR SAtE9
S,r/Car IC{ss6.7) faPtr(C91b~6. 11)
Yw lmg0t WNm Nw I~v9U WMaI ArP
1960 ia.7 0.7 6L 17.6 65 1116
fo•1 1l7 6.7 619 17.7 63 it1.J
t9a u] 17 61e n2 6.9 tts.e
19&T 1{.6 S7 617 162 6.1 1116
1Wa 1L7 17 616 17.7 U 117.1
ttm6 111 SS 87A 172 63 1063
1996 i~,] 6.T 669 17.2 t2 1065
19e7 d.7 37 917 16.9 d0 90.9
+066 u.e s.7 962 n.t 6.1 ta~.T
tYgn arU w,fm an pt+en n f~ era r awr• lac
FIGURE H
Ezcerpced From:
"Recommended Guidelines: for
J~ ~ Parkiog Geometries'!, Augusc,
EIIIIEIT D 1984; National Parkiog Assoc!
Parking Covsul[ancs Council
~~
'i~
/~~ .7s ~
~xw~gir ~I
~~=
~_Jti3G s fYC a 11~a;e s
dUXEXuiBir ~L
CITY OF RANG MO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMHZSSLON MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
June 20, 1991
Vice chairman Chit iea called the adjourned meeting of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at R:40 p.m. The meeting waa held in the
Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civ i< Center, 10500 Civic Canter ^zive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMIS SI ONERS: PRESENT: Susanne Chit iea, John Me loner, Wently Val lotto
ABSENT: Larry McNiel, Peter Tolet oy
STAFF PRESENT: eruce Rockingham, PLanninq Technician; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Otto Ercutil, Deputy Ci[y Planner; .Toe O•Nei1, city
Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer
I. P TA ON OP N I V CAP TAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
Joe O'Neil, city Engineer, presented the 91/92 Capital Improvement Budget.
The report use received antl tiletl.
IS. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A requ eat tc amend Tlt Le 17, Chapter 17.12 of the
Raneho Cucamonga Municipal Cotle to eliminate compact perking spaces.
Staff recommends issuance of a Neget ive Declaration. (Continued from June
12, 1991.)
III. NV RON N NT 91 O1
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A ragout to amend Part III of the Industrial
Specific Plan tc eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Dscl arse ion. (Continued from June 12, 1991.)
Vice Chairman Chit iea stated that the woekehop for bath items would be taken
together.
Dan Coleman, Pr incipel Planner, indicated that the purpose of the warkehop was
to provide an opportunity to review the information supplied by the tlavelopment
community and Chamber o£ Commerce and review their recommsndat ions regarding the
compact parking issue. Tni• workshop had been specifically requested by the
developers and the chamber to nllow far discussion of this important issue. In
addition, the dove loper• had raised a second issue regarding the parking
requirements for shopping centers.
Bruce Buckingham, Planning Tecnnlcian, gave an oral staff report.
/aR
John Potter, Hu ghee Inveetme nt s, asked iE there could be discuaeicn :egardic~
the secondary issue of parking ratios Eor shopping centers.
Mz. Coleman indicated that, if the commission desired, this iaeue could be added
to the Planning Division work program.
vice Chairman chit iea et aced chat thia iaeue would be discus eed after the
compact parking issue. '
Rance Clouse, Chamber of commerce representative, qu eerie ned how the new parking
requ rr emente would affect existing development.
Hr. Coleman responded that start's intention would bs to apply on Ly the new
stanaarde to new development; rosy would not apply to reetrip inq ar repaving of
ex feting parking lots oar would they bs applied to adtl Ltions. Hs said property
owner would have the opt J.on oC using the new et antlerd when ra striping their
parking lots.
Joe Oleeon, Lewis Homes, ind icatad that they hired a Ltaff is engineering
cc vault ant to survey vehic is •ize• at actual pro}act• within Rancho Cucamonga.
He stated that the survey data provided For the Commission showed that the City
ie comparable to the national averages.
Commies ioner Helcher etaGd that the universal size parking rtall seemed to be
the optimal eo let ion. Hs supported the development community's recommentlation
of down-sizing all parking spate to n univsrwl •ize of 8 1/2 fwe wide by 18
inches long.
Commie ioner Vellstte agrud.
Vice Chairman Ch it iea indicated that, in her oburvat ion, the trentl seems to be
toward bigger cars, trucks, and vans in Rancho Cucamonga because of the young
families. She stated that although a universal ^ize parking apace had ire
advantages, the preferred either dacraasing the length, but not the width, or
reducing the percencage of compact apace allowed.
The public hsacing was closed.
Otto Kcoutll, Deputy City Planner, stated that the wneensu• appeared to be a
"one-size-fits-all" parking space and the only outstanding issue wa^ the size of
the eta 11. Hs Lndlcated Ghat staff would bring this item back on August 14,
1991 for Commie ion dac Lion. In addition, he stated that tM as<ondery iaeue
of shopping center parklnq rat io• would aLO ba placed an eM same agenda for
conaiderat ion on whether to place Loam on ehs work program.
The meetyrtq~wa• (~}ourned at 9:30 p. m
Ra s'~ct/fu mleG ,
V
Otto Rtou 11
Deputy 5 cntary
Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - Juns 20, 199:
/3~
Section 17.12.050 Datign Standards
Design Standards are established oy :his section to set bases -ummua dimensi ors cent
gmCe lines for design, construction, and maintenance of harking wit..^,:n botn the
resiCenual end commercial districts.
A. General: The foLLowing standards sha^ apply to both the :esiCenc. el end
commercial districts.
~.~ gp~ Cl. Standnrd stall site: Each standard parking space shall consist of a
rectangtiler area not less then 9,0 feet wide by 19.0 feet long. .4ll perK:ng
a~ViSF~ spaces should have a vertical clearance of not test ttinn TS fee e,
Rtiv~sw ' ~ r
~:
~O .L 2.
~JI/~ifl
a.
Compact stall size: Stalb designated tar use by compact cnts may be
reduced in size to a minimum of eight (!) tact (n width snd s(xteen (16i feet
in length.
Handicapped stall size: Each parking space designrted foe use by the
MndicappW shall consist of a rectangular area not leaf than 14 feet wide oy
19 [eat long, and stall W located in an area not exceeding 2 percent slope.
All spaces shall be located near oe convenient to a level or ramped encrenee,
not axaadittg a S percent slope, to the facility seevad by the perking space.
Parking spaces for the Mndicapped shall lM signed end restricted for use oy
Ih! handicapped Only.
13!
Sectxn :-.:?,lgp
19. Maneuvering: Parking end maneuvering areas shall be arranged [het any vehicle
entering a public rightrof-way on a major or secondary street can do sa traveling .
in a forward direction.
B. Residential: The following design standards shall apply to the residential districts
and developments:
1. Covered off~treet parking spaces in a garage or carport shall be a minimum
o[ nine (9) feet in width and nineteen (19) feet in depth o[ unobstructed area
provided for perking purposes. The required minimum measurements may
not include the exterior walls or supports of the structure.
2. Driveways providing access to garages, carports and perking areas serving
three (3) or less dwelling units shell be a minimum of tan (10) feet in width
for one-way traftic, and twenty (20) feet for two-way traffic.
3. Driveways providing access to garages, carports, end open parking spaces
serving [our (4) or more dwelling units shell be a minimum of twelve (12)
Peet in width for one-way traffic, and twenty-four (24) feet for two-way
traffic.
4. Driveways serving multiple dwelling units with garages or carports on either
or both sides shell be increased a minimum of five (6) Ceet on one side only,
thus providing atwenty-nine (29) toot wide accessway between garage or
Catportspeces for two-way traffic.
5. No property owner shall sublease, subrent or otherwise make available to •
residents of other properties, the off-street parktng spaces required by this
section.
6. Atl required covered offstreet parking spaces shall be located conveniently
accessible to the dwelling wit served by such perking space.
?. Residential developments which provide private streets, shall be planned,
designed and constructed to meet the minimum City Engineering
requirements for private streets.
8. My secondary paved driveway or extension of the primary driveway shall
not be used for parking unless: (1) it connects the primary driveway access
to a second access point with the street or public right-of-way (i.e. cireWar
driveway) with a continuous pavement width not exceeding twelve (12)
feet; (2) it is an extension of the primary driveway toward the nearest side
or rear yard area; or (3) is constructed pursuant to an approved Minor
Development Review.
C. Commercial, Institutional. Com munity Facilities: The following design standards
shalt apply to commercial, institutional, end community facility uses.
I. Those areas desi¢nated for use by motorcycles shall consist of a minimum
usable area of fifty-six (S6) square feet.
r1
LJ
~~~!!'~- Revised 8.5 33
_. Psrk:ng Say `.v:d;."s shat oe computed accorctag :o ;ne ;Dec:f~. os:. ors --.
q_ ~~- forth m Table 1'..:.070-D.
YD Yt,~•~ ~. Two-way access driveways with no perking ihall be a minimum o:
~~'e~Gn twenty-four (21) feet. One-way access drtveways w!th no perking shall oe s
minimum o[ twelve (12) feet.
D. Park:n4 Feci!ity Design. Follcwing ere charts and diagrams to which all parking
amL[;es Snell be designed.
t. P~er~kin~~Ba_~Widths. Each perking facility is designed with parking bay
'0 ~ units.~'he size or width of thu unit is dependent on one or two-way traffic
and single or double loaded eislea. Vae the foLLowing chart [o determine the
QE~I "~P overall width of the perking Day design which is Deing used. The dimensions
listed ere the amount necessary to contsin perking stall depth entl aisle
width. Parallel Dorking may G permitted; however, they must not be
counted es part of the reQuired ~iveway width end must maintain tour (1)
~-' Ceet between spaces.
i Table 17.12.030-D - OaaraLL Parldq Ba7 PfidN
Perking Angle (in degrees)
30 a5 60 90
1. Perking by widtns for one-way
traffic end double loaded aisld:
~D a. compact stall 40' 44' 49' 66'
•.~ b, standard Stall 43' 49' 66' 6Y
-
• 2. Perking bey width foe one-way
traf[ic and single loaded aisles:
a. compact stall 26' 28' 72' 79'
b. standard Stall 28' 30' ~5' 13'
3, Perking Day widttu for two-way
traffic and double loaded aisles:
e. eompect atoll 48' 92' 64' S6'
D, standard atoll 81' 88' 89' 62'
4. Perking bay Widtlr far two-way ~ ,
traffic and aingU loaded aitlas:
a. comportstall
34'
36' 1
38'
'~~:{p~
D, standard atoll 38' 33' 41' il'
Mawe a.~
w~o+N
X33 -+r~-
3eet:on '. ',1'_.030
2. Planter Pesisn. All parking lot planters shall be designed to meet [he
following minimum requirements.
(e1 Planters shall be separated from maneuvering and perking areas by a
6" rsised,concrete curb or equivalent,
(b) Tree planting wells locnted at the front of perking stalls shall contain
a minimum of 25 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shell
not be less then 5 feet.
QO~Qrr. NalIMW It/I(~
INONa~ ~aF or 6fM1.
(c) Landscape planters elorg the sides of perking stalls shell Conte in a
minimum of 90 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shell
not be less than 6 feet.
(d) Pedestrian walks shall be provided in landscape planters along the
sides of perking stalls as shown Delow. [t shell consist of a minimum
12-inch concrete paver, adjacent to the curb (including curb width).
3. Perkins Lot Strioirut and Nerkinss. Parking stall striping, directional arrows
end parking stall identification shell meet the following standards.
(a) Alt perking stalls shall be painted with double or hairpin 4-inch wide
continuous lines with the two (2) lines located an equal nine (9) inches
on either side n[ the stall sidelines.
(b) All aisles, entrances, and exits shall be clearly marked with
dtrectionel arrows painted on the parking surface.
~~ ~ ~) All compact parking stalls shall be individually labeled with the words
qe~e~° "compact car" painted on the perking surface of each stall.
(d) All handicapped perking stalls shalt be individually labeled and signed
in accordance with Uniform Builditg Code end California Vehicle
Code standards.
i~~ -~
Section 17.14.040 Perkirar Bequireants
The tollavi ng sections list the required arount of ?ark ing .for each ca :egory
o: uses, special requi renents and ap[ionel requ irerrents.
d. Residential
i. Single-Cani ly detached dwellings (conventional). 'Rw (2) parking
spaces within a garage.
2. Cluster dove lopment (condaninium, townhcme, etc.) Semi ~etacheC
single Ceni ly (zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) end rrootle
hate parks:
(a) Studio: 1.3 off-street parking space per unit o[ which one
space shall be in a garage or cerpor t.
(6) Che (1) bedroom: 1.5 of C-street perking spaces per unit of
which one space shall be in a gsrege or carport.
(c) Tiso (2) bedroma: 1.8 oft-street park ittg spaces per unit of
which ono space shall [N in • garage or carport.
(d) Three (3) or nora bedroare: TMo of !-street perking spaces per
unit of which two spaces shall N in • garage or carport..
(e) Four (4) ar trove badrome: 2,3 off-street parking spaces per
unit of vR;ich two spaces mull be in a garage or carport.
(t) In addition to the required ntstDer of parking spaces for each
unit, one off-street uncovered parking space shell he provided
for each four units for visitor parking. For single family zero
lot line, patio horns, and duplexes, an-street perking nay be
substituted for visitor parking, v8iere su[Cicient street
pevetent width end dis lance WtwNn drivlwsys has been provided,
(g) Fifty percent (SOK) of the total required covered spaces shell
ba within mcloeed gaeaga atructura.
~, (h) For dwelopmants containing five or more unite, up to tnirty-
fiw (3S) percent of tM required uncoverW spaces may be
OE{,~D catpact car aiza.
(i) The ua of carports requires appeoval trap the Design Peview
Cmmittae.
B. Crnnercial/Office
1. Camercial, retail end service uses:
~~.J ~
i
gl :...^.urenes and Diner ~iaees ~f ssse ^. o'.{: not soec'.f.ed ao-ve: --_ ...
each `our X11 fixeC ses[s .~ithm ;he r. am sudaor::^~ :r :~ -
thirty-five (73) square feet of sear.ng area wi thin tra ram suc~.:~r.:-,
where there are no fixed seats; eighteen (lal unear :nerves o:' oe-.c-.
shall be Considered a fixed Seat.
~. Other uses:
!a) Day nurseries, including preschools end nuaery schoo ts: One stag fir
each staff member, plus one for esch five (5) children.
C. S ecial Re uirements. The foLLowing perking requirements ere applicable to a:i
com mernel and a tt land uses. These special stalls shell be closest to ;.ne
facility Cor which they ere designated in order to encourage their use.
1. Handicapped: Those facilitin with twenty-live (2S) or more spaces shell
designate two (2) percent or one (1) space, whichever is greater, of the total
number of stalls for use by the handicapped. The designation and desgn
shall cronform to state standards.
2. Motorcycle: Facilitin with twenty-five (2S) or more parking spaces shall
provide at least one designated perking area for use by motorcycles.
Developments with over one hundred (100) spaces shall provide motorcycle
perking at the rate of one percent. Areas detinested for use by motorcycles
t~ shall meet standards set forth in subsection 17.12.030-1.
Tp ~ ta. Compact can: Facilities with twenty-five (2S) or more perking spaces may
L provide up to thirty-five (3S) percent of its parkirtg for use by compact
~~~ can. Spaces delinested for compndt car use shall meet standards set forth
in subsection 17.12.030-A-2.
J. Bicycles: All commercial and office areas shell provide adequate locking
facilities far bicycle parking at any locstion convenient to the facility for
which they are designated. Whenever passible, weatherproofing or facility
covering should be used.
5. Cer pooh: Ottytraat parking provided for commsrciaUoffitt facilities snau
provide et lest [en (10) percent of tM total parking area as designated for
use by cu pools.
6. Drive-TMu Paeilltie: Drive-thru facilitie require special consideration es
tMir design can significantly impact the vehicular circulation on a site. The
foliowtrtg requirements apply to any use with drive-thru facilities.
(a) EaM drive-thru lane snaLL be separated from the circulation routes
necessary for ingress or egress from Ne property, ar access to any
parking space.
(b) EacA drive-thru lone shall be striped, marked, or otherw tse ^unnctly
delinnted.
i3~ .«'"
sw. ...,..re
=w...
c..~u-op ct- ..~,,. ~.~...
~~ ~ ~,l JRB, 5w. Y.' I
Y~"~ ~~ I S ~ ~ I 5u4,S ~ 5 ~ ~\
r~ SucC~ F J' yid
j ~
a ~~
.'T.'JO,.E ~
~~: ~~
I v~,..~
aurnu-im~ 'w~~o v a e a` l
4. Aisle dimensions: Each parking and loading space shall have adequate drives,
aisles, end turning and maneuvering areas for access and usability, in
accordance with Table 17.12.050-D.
3. Paving: Perking and loading facilities shall be surfaced end maintained witti
asphaltic, concrete, or other permanent, impervious surfacing material
sufficient to prevent mud, dust, loose materiel, end other nuisances.
Alternate surface material can be considered by the City Pianner, it shown
that such material wil! not cause adverse effects end that it will remain in a
usable condition.
6. Drainage: .111 parking end loading facilities shaLL be graded and provided
with permanent storm drainage facilities. Surfacing, curbing, and drainage
improvements shall be sufficient to preclude free [low of water onto
adjacent properties or public streets or alleys, and to preclude standing pools
o[ water within the perking facility.
7. Safety features: perking end loading facilities shall meet the Following
standards:
(a) Safety barriers, protective bumpers or curbing, end directional
markers shall be provided to assure pedestrian/vehicular safety,
efficient utilization, protection to landscaping, end to prevent
encroachment onto adjoining public or private property.
(b) Visibility of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists shell be assured
when entering individual oerking spaces, when circulating within a
parking facility, and when entering end casting a parking facility.
(c) Internal cireWation patterns, and the location and traffic direction of
all access drives, shell be Cesigned and maintained in accord xitn
accepted principles of traffic engineering end traffic safety.
/3 7
c. Research and bevel oDmen t: 1 space per iSJ
square feet (research services only ),
d. Office end Admini stra tS on: 1 space per 25J
square feet.
e. Multi-use tenant Duil di ngs where office use
does not exceed 35f of building area: 1
space per 400 square feet.
f. Following lnterlor building areas can De
deducted from the overall parking
requl remen ts: el ec trtcat/mechanical rooms,
elevator shafts, sutrwell s, and multi-
story loDbfes.
Bicycle and Other Two
Wheel Vehicular Faclltties F.4. B1cytle storage facilities shall be provided
within all development and relate to planned
and exist ing bicycle routes.
F.S
'~1
,;ompact Spaces ~ F.6.
F.7.
Required on-sl to park ing may De reduced at a
rate of one automobile parking space per 4
spaces of Dlcycle or other two wheel vehicular
parking up to three automobile parking spaces
or SS of total required on-Site parking,
whichever Ts less.
20f to 35f of all required parking stalls shalt
be devoted to compact tar use. Minimum stall
dimension shall De 8' 1n width and 16' in
length and marked for cgmpact cars.
All Parking areas shall be screened from public
vtew through the use of berms, landscaping
material and taw walls.
Loading Fac111ttes F.B. All load/ng fac111t1es and maneuvering areas
must b! pl site with Che ust.
~.
F.9.
~~
F. 10,
F, 11.
~ i.12.
All loading fac111t1es shall be permitted only
1n Lhe rar and lnterlor side yard areas except
within the Heavy Industrial category and rail
servtd Du 11d1ngs.
A1slt width to iadtng docks shall De a minimum
of 50' width plus additional width for truck
parking (typically 40 to 50 feet).
Loading docks shall bt set back a minimum of
70' from street property lint.
Parking stalls for trallen shall De 50' x l4'
and provided at ratio of 1 stall per truck
loading dock door.
~~O
-Fl.E.
Hs. Miller stated that Hellman Avenue is a busy collector street, and
Engineering tries to minimize the number of driveways.
Chairman McNiel asked the process if the corm fission directs it shou Ld be a
flag lot.
Ma. Miller replied that a flag lot would have to be created through a lot line
adjua tment which could be done at the staff level. She statetl that it would
still require the atzeet to be vacated, so that cou id move forward.
chairman HcNie1 invited public comment
Steve Buttes, 92fi0 Mignonette Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he currently
lives in the westerly house and hie son lives in the easterly house. He said
the application fie a joint one from both property owners. Mr. Butters stated
they consi dared a Elag lot but opted far an eaa ement because a Elaq lot would
require certain setbacks which would be more restrictive than those required
if an easement is utilized. He said Engineering had also indicated they were
interested in keeping the street access to Hellman to a minrmum. Ne said they
realized they had cut their own options foz future euDdiviaicn, but they
decided they would prefer an easement.
There were nc further public commence.
Motion: Moved by Mslcher, seconded by Tolstoy, to recommend Vacation of a
Recorded Offer of Dedication Ear a Portion of Mignonette Street with a requ set
that due cone itlerat ion be given to [he matter of a flag lot as opposed to an
easement. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLETOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMIEEIONERS: NONE -carried
POE LIC HEARINGS
E. ENVIRONXENT ~ ACfPCCUi`uT qN0 D VELOPNENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO COCI~MpNGA - A request to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of [he
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact perking sparse.
Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (COntlnued from
August 16, 1991.E
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDOSTRIAL SPE TFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 -
CITY OF BANCH_O COpA~N,~ONC~A - A request to amend Pare ISI of the Induetrral
Area Specific Plan [o eliminate compact parking spaces. 5[a E[ recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continuetl from August 16, 1991.E
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Planning Commission Mrnutee -fi- August 2B, 1991
r3 g
EK~,e~r ~
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing
Sary cockro Et, Lewis Hamee, 1156 No r<n Kount sin, Upland, stated they ware in
agreement with the propo aed aisle wiachs antl felt the new chart ie
compze hens ive enough to cover the majority of setups. He thought the chart
gives the intent and any other configurations cou la be easily tler ived.
Rance Cloue e, chamber of Commerce, 10370 Commerce Center, Rancho Cucamonga,
thanked staff and the Planning Commission fcr the opportunity to part ie ipate
in the process. He stated the Chamber endorses the changes.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He
commented the result was the work of many.
Commies io her Ch it iea stated she did not object to the ono-size-fits-all
concept, but she objected to making the coerce narrower than the present
width. She felt the size of parking lots will not decrease, but retail apace
will increase.
Commies ioner Tolst oy stated he did not oppose the elimination of compact
parking epacee but he did not think a-1/2 feet is wide enough fot a eLanderd
size. He ea id Chat iE people tlcive straight in, ouch a size would be
acceptable, but people park at angles. Ne ditl noC feel the new ei ze would be
wide enough to accommodate shopping carte between care, and ha felt a standard
size of 9 feet x 1E Eeet would be a good solution.
Comm ice ioner Chit iea concurred with Commissioner Toletoy.
Motion: Moved by Melcher, secontletl by Valletta, co adopt the reeolutione
recommending approval o£ Environmental Aeaesament and Oeve lopment Code
Ame ndmant 91-01 and Environmental Aeseeeme nt and Industrial Specific PLan
Amendment 91-01. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, ME LCHE R, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHSTI EA, TOLSTOY
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried
G. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TPACT 17351 - LEWIS HOMES - A requ eat to modify
a previously approved Tract Map Go inc cease the number of multi-family
lot• from one lettered and Eive numbered lots Co one lettered end seven
numbered lots for 118 condominium units on 11,2 ac ree of land in the Low-
Medium Reeideni iel deeignat ion ~4-S dwelling un Lta per acre) of the Terra
Viaca Planned Community, located at Che southwest cornet of Milliken
Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-091-37.
Scott Murphy, Aeaoc iota Planner, presented the staff report.
Planning Comm ieeion Minutes -7- August 18, 199:
~O
A. TIME E%TE YSION FOR -ES IGY REVIEW FOR °vNTAi'VE TAAC- 13565 PhASES 5, i
AND 8! - sTANDAAD PACIFIC - p request for an extension of a prevrccsly
apprcved tle sign review of bu iltling elevations and date rl ed site plan foc
Phases 6, ], and B, (consisting of 125 single family lots on 66.] acres of
land) of a previously County-approved map north of summit Avenue and east
of wartlman Bullock Road - APN: 226-082-16, 1], antl 27.
3. T:HE E%TENSIOY FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTAT•VE TRACT 13565 MASES 5 9
AN- .vl - STANDARD PACIFIC - A iequ eat far an exte n9ion of a prev roux ly
approved tlaeiyn review of bu iLd ing elevations antl detailed site plan for
Ph ae es 5, 9, and 10 (consisting of 108 •inglq family lots on 54.5 acres of
land) of a previously County-approved map north of Summit Avenue and east
of Wardman Euliock Road - APN: 226-082-16, 17, and 2].
C. VACATION OF A PORTTON OF 5TH ST T A AN N D LO PMElITS, INC. - A
request to vacate a portion of 25th st rget, located west of Etiwanda
Avenue and north of 26th Street - APN: 225-oR2-Oi.
Ccmmrea inner Melcher requeatetl that Item C be pulled from the Consent
Calendar.
Notion: Moved by Chit ien, seconded by Toletoy, unanimously carried, to adopt
Zteme A and B of thq Congqnt Calgndar.
VACATION OF A PORTION OF 2cTg ~
commissioner He lc her asked iE the •t rest Co bg vacated i• located at the north
City limit.
shrntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer, ree pondgd affirmatively.
Commrse ra ner Meleher questioned if the tlge ign of Tract 14139 depends an the
street or rf Euture development to the north would require the street.
Mr. Bose replied a condition of approval far Tract 14139 requires vacation of
thq et rear and the circular ion plan [or Etiwanda North indicates accae• being
taken north of ehg area.
Motion: Movetl by Me lc he r, seconded Dy Tolgtoy, unanimously carried, to adopt
Item C of the Congqnt Calgndar.
PL'DLIC HEARINCs
0. ENVIRONMENTAL Accc ccg u p FAIT 00 AHEND MENT 91-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAHONCA - A request to amentl Titl• 17, Chapbr 17,12 of the
Poncho Cucamonga Municipal Cade to eliminate compact perking apace e.
Scoff recommends Lsuance of a Negative Declaration. (continued Erom June
20, 1991.)
P 1ann:ng Commies ion Mrn utee -2- August 14, 199:
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND IND USTR-AL SPECIFIC PLAN A.N NDNENT 91 O1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A requ eat to amend Part III of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff recommends
issuance cf a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 20, 1991.(
Bryce Buckingham, Planning Technician, presented the staff report and stated
chat new inf ormat ron had come co staff's attention in the last 24 hours that
the Planning Commission may wish to discuss. He stated that tiqu res were
reversed on the last line of Table 1]. /2.030.D shown on page ^,E-26. He also
commented that [ha section of the same table regarding one-way traffic tlid not
include numbers permitting an overhang. He reported that the handicapped
spaces could be reduced to 18 Eeet in length under the Uniform Building
Code. Mr. Buckingham said that Mr. Potter has ragas at etl that mention be made
that there was a typing error in fhe August ], 1991, letter from Hughes
Investments, and the Suburban vehicles actually accounted for slightly less
than .9 percent (instead cf 9 percent) of the total vehicles surveyed by
Ru ntzman Associates.
Objecting to the ward "consensus" in ref arence to the Commission's wa rkshop,
Commissioner Chit iea st atetl that at the June 20, 1991, meeting she had voiced
her oppoa it ion to a uniform 8-1/2 foot by 18 foot space.
Mr. Buckingham respondetl that two of the three Comm issionera present at the
meeting supported the uniform size.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Joe Oleson, Lewis Nomes, 116fi North Mountain Avenue, Upland, st a[etl the
details of the formula foz determining overlap are esoteric. He requested a
continuance to allow time to work out the dot ails with staff. He was
especially concerned regarding the overlap and felt engineers ehou ld work out
the angles and geometrace. He requestetl that the commiaeion provide for
additions! review and approval by staff if the Amendments were approved this
evening.
Jahn Potter, Hu ghee Snve et me nt e, Two Corporate Plaza, Suite 250, Newport
Beach, reiterated that there are only .9 percent Suburbans, as opposed to the
9 percent mentioned in hie letter. He said the clearance apace would et ill be
in the acceptable 24-inch range if the B-1/2 foot width were adopted.
Rance Ciouse, Chamber of Commerce, 10770 Commerce Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, thanked the Commission and staff Eor allowing the participation of
the chamber of Commerce. He said the Chamber had worked with the development
community and the tenant community. He reported that the Chamber endorsee the
recommended B-1/2 foot x 18 foot uniform size. He said there appears to be
one more technical issue which needs to be cLarif ied.
Hearing no further teat imony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hear ng. He
ae ked what staff felt regactling the oveclap issue.
Brad Buller, City Planner, recommended that the Plann rng Commisa ion conduce a
brief diacuas ion on the merits of the proposed un Lfarm size (B-1/2 feet x 18
Planning Commission Minuiea -J- August i4, 1991
/ ~~
feet). He said the technical issue on how it is measured could be discussed
once it is determined the B-1/2 Enna x 18 Foot stall is appropriate. He
ins scat ed the exhibit on page U,E-25 depicts the measurements for the apace,
but tloes no[ include the overlap dimension. He suggested that if the
Comm Lesion wanted to pu roue a meaeu re of leeway to allow overlap, et afE could
work out the numbers.
Comm Las inner chit sea etatetl that when the Commieaion Eiret approached the
issue, it was to improve the quality of parking within the City to be aura the
neat possible parking is available for patrons of bus inaesea in the City and
spaces were large enough and comfortable enough to enter and exit vehicles.
She recalled there had been some abuse eE the compact parking and the
commieaion wanted to look at the numbers to see iE it was appropriate to
retain compact parking. She felt that to downeixe the parking epacee and make
them narrower would be inappropriate. She thought the width between vehicles
ie important Ear allowing people to gat in an out of vehicles comfortably and
makes the community more pleasant. She praferced either retaining the width
at 9 feet and shortening the length or reducing the number of compact
epacee. She to It that compact parking may have a place ao long ae it ie
appropriately designed in the parking plan being disbursed throughout the
project.
Commies inner Toletoy agreed with Commies inner Chitiea. Me pzeEe rrad to keep
the 9 foot dimension because of the use of shopping carte and the loatling and
unloading of children.
Commies inner Valletta etatetl the master had been under investigation for a
long time and she felt the 8-1/2 foot width would 6e adequate.
commieaioner Malch¢r concurred with Conuniee Loner Valletta. Ha felt there was
evidence that 8-1/2 feet works beeauee care ate getting emal le r. He thought
it would solve the problem of the mieu ee of compact epacee and making parking
convenient fa: everyone.
Chairman McNiel stated he was one of the proponents for change becau ae
regardless of the size of the parking apace, people perk in the closest
available apace. He felt en 8-1/Z foot x 18 foot Uniform apace would be a
reaeonabls compromiea and he thought it would work better than what ie
available today.
Comm see TOner Melchor etatad there an some incone ietenciee which need to 6e
resolved. He felt the layout of perking lot• should be etraightforwartl
mathematics end ha requested that ha work with staff in working out the
number if the matter were coot sowed.
Motion: Moved by Toletoy, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the reaolutiana
recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and oavslopment Code
Amendment 91-01 entl Environmental Aeeeeemant and Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment 91-01, with mod if scat ions to change the uniform apace to 9 feat x 18
feet. Motion failed to carry by she following vote:
Planning Commie ion Minutes -4- August 14, 1991
I~3
AYES: COMM ZSSIONEAS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMN ISSIONEAS: MCNIE L, ME LCMER, VALLETTE
ARSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -failed to carry
Motion: Roved by Melcher to adopt the resolut io ne in principal for an
e-1/2 foot by 1B foot uniform parking apace subject to the preparation of
corrected exhibits to support the resolut io ne to be returned to the Commission
for approval.
Ralph Hanson, city Attorney, suggest ed that if the matter were to be returned
to the Commission, that the public hearing be cent inued so that a definite
recommendation could be made to the City Count il.
Comm iseioner Melcher withdrew the motion.
Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Vallett e, to continue Environmental
Asaee ems nt and Development Code Amendment 91-01 and Environmental Assessment
and Indu atrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-01 to Augu et 28, 1991, to permit the
exhibits and proposed ordinances be eorrecied with the understanding that the
8-1/2 foot x 18 foot apace be the bee ie for the corrections.
chairman McNiel reopenetl the public hearing.
Motion to continue to August 28, 1991, carried by Ghe following vote:
AYF-5: COMMISSIONERS: MCN IEL, MELCHE R, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA
ABSENT: COMHZSSIONERS: NONE
-carried
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOP FNT COD AM NDMENT 91 02 CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANONGA - A request to amend va[iaue development etantlarde and
design guitlelinee for multi-family residential dietiic[e. Staff
recommentla ie euance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from July 10,
1991.(
G. °~I_RONMENTAL ASSESSMENm AND E IWANDA SP N ANEM Ol FN 91 02A
CITY OF RANCHO CVC e0N-a - A request to amend various development
standards and design gu idelinea Eor multi-family residential dietricta
within Che Et iwanda Spec iEic Plan area. Staff recommends iaauance of a
Negative Declaration. (Continued from July 10, 1991.E
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TFOO VISTA P ANN OMMUNITY NT 91 02
--CITY OF RANG O CUCAM0NCI1 - A [aquae[ to amend various development
st andarde and design guidelines Eor multi-family residential diet rids
within the Terra VieLa Planned Commun Lty area. Staff recommends issue nce
of a Negative Declerat ion. (Continued from July 30, 1991.)
Planning Commies ion Minutes -9- Augue[ 14, 1991
I~~
RESOLUTION NO. ).-"'
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNSNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OP
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 AMENDING TITLE 17,
CHAPTER 1J. 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HUN IC IPAL CODE TO
ELIMINATE COMPACT PARR ING SPACES AND REDUCE THE STANDARD
SIEE PARAINC SPACE TO 8.5 FEET BY 1B FEET, AND HARING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recit ale.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe initiated an application for
Development Code Amendment Nc. 91-01 se tleecribad in the title of this
Reeolut ion. Hereinafter in thin Raeolution, the subject Development Code
Amendment ie referred to as "the application."
(ii) on the 10th day of April 1991, and tontlnued to rho 12[h day of
June, the 20th day of June, the 16th tlay of Au goat, and the 28th day of Auquet
1991, the Planning Comm iaeion of the City of Aencho Cucamonga conducted duly
noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hoar Loge on that
date.
(iii) All legal prerequleitee prlot to the adoption of this Raeolution
have occurred.
B. Raeolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it ie hereby Lou ntl, dotermi ned, antl repo lvetl by the
Planning Commteeion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows:
1. This Commteeion hereby epecif ically finds that all of the feats
eat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Rego lotion are true and correct.
2. Based upon eubetant ial evidence presented to this Commteeion
during eho above-referenced public hearings on April 10, Juno 12, .lung 20,
August 14, and August 28, 1991, including written and oral staff report e,
together with public testimony, this Conm fission heroDy specifically finds ae
follows:
(e) Tho application applies to ell properties located within
the Ctty; and
(b) The proposed amendments will not have a eignif icent impact
on the environment ae evidenced by the cant lue ions and find Inge of the initial
Study, Porte I and II; and
J. Based upon the eu betant ial evidence presented to this Commteeion
tlur in9 the above-referenced public hearings end upon the specific find toga of
farts set forth in peragraph• 1 end 2 above, thi• Commteeion hereby Einde and
conaludee ee follows:
l~
PLANNING COHMISS ION RESOLUTION NO. .-.,.
OCA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 2R, 1991
Page 2
(a) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Vee Pol iciea
of the General Plan and will provide for development within the tlistrict in a
manner coneis tent with the General Plan and with related development; and
fib) That the proposed amendment is cone is tent with the
object ivee of the Development Code; and
(c) That the proposed amendment will not to detrimental to the
public health, ea Eety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
(d) That she proposes amendment will not ba detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby Finds that the project has been reviewed
and coneitlerad in compliance with the Cel ifornia Environmental Quality Act of
19]0 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
5. Rased upon the findings and cone lueione set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
(a~ That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 91-01 to
modify the Municipal Code psi the attached Ortllnnnce.
S. The Secretary to Lhi• Commisa ion shall ca re ify io the adoption
of this Reea Lur.ion.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991.
PLANNING COMM LSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONCA
dhr~
McNle 1, Chairn
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comm ea ion of the CLty of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby cart ify that the foregoing Resolution wee duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted 6y the Plennin9 Comm ise Lon of the
City of gaucho Cucamonga, at a regular mes[ing of the Planning Commission held
on the 78th day Of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NCNIE L, MELCHER, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Ci7I TIEA, TOLS'NY
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~~~'
REEOLVTiON ND. .. __.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINATING
COMPACT PAREING SPACES, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe snit Latetl an application for
Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-07 as described in she title o£ this
Reeolut ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the eubj act Industrial Spee if ie
Plan Amendment ie cefecrsd to ne "the application."
iii) On the 10th day of April 1991, and coot Lnued [o the 12th day of
June, the 20th tlay of June, the 14th day of August, and the 28th day of August
1991, the Planning Commieeian of fns City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly
noticed public hearings on the applicet ion antl concluded said hearings on that
date.
(iii) All Legal prerequieitee prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
E. Resolution.
NOw, THEREFORE, it ie nereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows:
1. This Commission hereby epecif ically Einde that all of the facto
set forth in the ReC itele, Patt A, of this Rego lotion are true antl correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commies ion
during the above-referenced public hearing• on April 30, June 12, June 20,
August 14, and August 28, 1991, including written and oral staff reports,
together with pubLie tutimony, thL CommiuLon hereby speel[Seally finds ea
follows:
(e) The epplicei ion applies to all Properties located within
the Industrial Area Epacif is Plan; end
(b) The proposed amendments will not hove a significant impact
on the environment ae evidenced by the conclueion• and findings of the Initial
Study, Part II; and
3. Eased upon the substantial evidence presented eo this Commieeian
during the above-referenced public hearing• end upon the spacif le findings of
facie eat forth in peragraph• 1 and 2 above, thi• Comm1e•ion hereby Ei ode and
ronclude• ae Eol low:
(e) ThL amendment dare not con El Lct with the Lnnd Use Policies
of the General Plan end will provide for development within the district in a
manner coneietent with the General Plen end with re laird de~slopment; and
/~~
PLANNING GOMHI SSION RESOLUTION NO. -.---
ISPA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA
August 28, 1991
Page 2
(b) Thai the propoeetl amendment ie cone ietent with the
object ivee of the Industrial Area Specific PLani attd
(c) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, saf sty, or welfare or materially injurious [o props rtiee or
improvements in the vicinity; and
(tl) That the propoeetl amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives cE the Ge naral Plan or the induetr ial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commieeion hereby Pinde that the project has been reviewed
and considered in campLiance with the California Environmental Quality Ac[ of
1970 and, further, this Commies ion hereby recommends iseu ante of a Nag alive
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and coot lueion• set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 1, and 4 above, this Ocmmieeion hereby ceeolves as Eollowe:
(a) That the Planning Comm ie sion of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby reeommentle approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amsndmene
91-01 amending Part IIZ, Section F.6 per the attached Ordinance.
6. Ths Secretary to thL Commie ion shall sect ify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991.
PLANNING CO! ISSI ON OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: e
arty T MGNLe 1, Chairmen
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commieeion of Che City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby cart Lfy that the foregoing Resolution wee duly and
rage larLy inerotluced, passed, and adopted by the Planning commies ion of the
City cE Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mestlnq of the planning Commission held
on the 28th day of August 1991, 6y the [o LlowLng vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, ME LCHER, 'JALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY
ABSENT: COMMISEI ONERS: NOtiE
/ ~~
ORDINANCE NC. ~ ~~
AN ORD iNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFOPN IA, APPROVING OEVEL OPMENT CODE AMENDMEYT
91-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12, OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MVNLCIPAL CODE, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES
A.ND REDUCING THE STANDARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO 8T5 FEET BY 1B
FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWB:
SECTION 1: Section 17. 12.030.A. 1. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to
read in words and figures as EolLows:
1. Standard stall size: Each p king space shell consist of a
rectangular area not less than feet wide by 18.0 feet long. In
measuring the length of paving required for a parking space, allowance
may be made for up to a 1-foot vehicle projection beyond the bumper oz
rite stop if such projection does not interfere with landscaping or
pedestrian use. All perking spaces shall have a ve rtlcal clearance of
not leas than 7.5 feet.
~~~
SECTION 2: Section 17.12.030.A. 2. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to
read in words and figures as follows:
2. When a side of any parking space abuts a buildings wall, support
column, or other obstruction which Sn to rferee in eny way with access
to a motor vehicle, the space shall be a minimum of 2 feet wider than
othe rwi ae required by this section.
~~9
C LTY ~~ :::C CI, pRD INAV CE NO.
DCA 91-01 - =iTY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA
October lo, 1991
Page 2
SECTION 3; Section 17.12.030.x,3. cf Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to
-ead in words and Ei gores as .follows:
3. ^.`wo-way access driveways with no parking shall be a minimum of 24
.eet, except 26 feet shall be provided where necessary for emergency
vehicle access. One-way access driveways with no parking shall be a
minimum of 12 feet.
SECTION 4; Section 17.12.030 .D.1. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to
read in words and figures as follows:
1. Each parking facility is designed with perking bay units. The sire or
width, of this unit is dependent on one- or two-way traffic and single-
or double-loaded aisles. Use the following table to determine the
overall width of the parking bay design which is being used. The
dimensions listed ars the amount necessary to contain parking stall
depth and aisle width, without overhang. Parallel parking may be
permitted; however, it must not be counted as part of the required
driveway width and must maintain 4 feet between spaces.
Table 17.12.030.0 - Overall Yarkinq Hey Nidth
30 Parking Angle
45 (in degrees)
60
90
1. Aisle Width
a. one-Way Traffic 12' 16' 18' 24'
b. Two-way Traffic 20' 21' 22' 24'
2. Single-Loaded Hay Width
One-Way Traffic
a• wall-to-Wall 28'4" 32'9" 37'10" 42'0"
b. overlap 2d'8" 29'9" J6'9" 42'0"
3. Doub le -Loaded Bay Width
One-way Traffic
a. Wall-to-Wall 44'B" 61'6" 67'e" 60'0"
b. Overlap 37'4" 45'6" 53'6" N/A
4. Single-Loaded Bay Width
'.`.~o-Way Traffic
a. Wa11-to-Wall 35'4" 39'9" 41'10" 42'0"
b. Over iep 32'8" J6'9" 79'9" 42'0"
S. Double-Leaded Bay Width
Two-Way Traffic
a. Wall-tn-Wall 52'B" SB'6" 61'8" 60'0"
b. Overlap d5'4" 52'6" 57.6" N/A
~ ~ L_J
CI^Y CO VACT:. OPD TVAtirc y~~~
DCA 91-01 - CTIY JF P.ANCNO Cn^AMCtiGA
October 16. 1991
Page 3
e
E
A = ANGLE
e ~ AISLE WIOTN
C ~ BAY WIDTN ONE-WAY SNIGLE LOADED
WALl~TO-WALL
D ~ BAY WgTN ONE-WAY SMKiLE LOADED
OVERLAP
E a 8AY WEITN TWO•WAY OOIMLE LOADED
WALL-TO-WALL
F • qAY WgTN TWO-WAY PODSLE LOADED
OVERLAP
SECTION 5: Section 17.12.030.D.3. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby deleted Ln
its entirety and all subsequent sections renumbered accordingly.
SECTION 6: Section 17. 12.040.A.2.Ih) of Chap tar 17.12 Ss hereby deleted in
its entirety and all subsequent sections renumbered accordingly.
SECTION 7: Section 17.12.040.0.3. is Hereby deleted in its entirety and
all subsequent sections renumbered accordingly.
SECTION e: Sect Son 17.02.030.A.3. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended co
read Ln words and flgurea a9 fo llovs:
Handicapped stall size: F,aeh pa rkinq space designated for use
by the handicapped shall consist of a re rtanqular area not less
than 14 feet vide by 18 feet long, end shall be loco tad in an
area not exceeding 2 percent slope. All specea shell be
Inca tad near of convenient to a level or ramped entrance, not
exceedl nq a S percent slope, to the fact llty served by the
parking space. Perking spaces for the handicapped shall be
signed end rea iricted for use by the handicapped only.
~'
CITY COUNCIL UROINAN CE N0.
UCA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CL CAMONGA
October 16, 1991
pa qe 4
-wCUny ~~~^'~~ ,... _,
~~
>•IyI,G i~lff ~ ,~ Y
•
;
r .
s'~> -'y -qty..>L_
.
iut ~.
{
r ~,
-~~~
~~ 'eV r
~ ~
`
W
y~
~+ewnpr~
a.mcc r-ae~o .w~a+.w..-t
[~YMG'A•l 7wl{I V awt
>01~
4MJDIUpPr,O °J17Ltr LRE
SECTION 9: This Council findB that this amendment will not adversely
affect the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or ward of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by
any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any
preemptive legislation, the remaining provislons, Sections, paragrnpha, sentences,
and words of this Ordinance shell remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certi Ey the adoption of Lh1s Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after St9 passage at least
once in the Inland Valley Da11y Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, Cali EOYnla, end circulated in the City of Poncho
Cucamonga, California.
~~
ORDINANCE NO. ~ "
A.V ORDIR ANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CCC AMONGA, CALIFO R.N IAA APPROV IVG INDUSTRIAL SPEC ZFIC PLAN
AY.ENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINATING COMPACT PA RXING SPACES, ANb
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
THE CII^,' CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Part III, Section F•6 is hereby deleted in its entirety
and all subsequent se ctiona renumbered accordingly.
SECTION 2: This Council finds that this amendment sill not adve zse ly
affect the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
SECTION 3: The City Council de clarea that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or wozd of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be pub liehed within 15 days after its
passage at least once, in the Inland Va Lley Daily Eulle tiny a newgpaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Panchn Cucamonga, California.
153
------ CITI' QF RANCHO C1X;AMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 16, 1991
To: Mayor and Membete of the City Council
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Ae slat ant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: TMSNT TO PARSING TATION IL SCNSD
RHCGV4ffiNDATION
,:'.:a:ti:'.
,:
It ie recommended that the City Council atlopt the attached resolution which will
adju et the City's bail schedule amount by $5 for each violation.
BACSGRDDXD
Due to recent State legislation, epecif is ally SB 21, AE 544 and AS 1297, the
County has been authorized to collect $5 for every parking violation on which
we collect. In accordance with these provisions of State law, the County
notified the City that they intend to et art collecting iheee additional footle.
Even though the City of Rancho Cucamonga processes its own parking citations,
under State law, we are still obligated to pay the $5 per citation collected to
the County. It ie estimated that if we do not act now to raise our parking bail
schedule, we stand to lose approximately 520,000 from our existing revenue stream
from parking citations.
For these reasons, it ie recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
reeolut ion which would increase our bail schedule by $5 for each violation. It
the City Council adopts the attached resolution, staff will immediately begin
the work to have new chat ions printed which reflect the increased bail amount
and also Indicate what the additional bail amount is for. For example, the
ticket would read parking violation $25 plus $5 for court and jail construction
Eund.
Respectfully submitted,
r,
Duane A. Raker
Aeaistant to the City Manager
DAB/t lr
DA 8:946
Attachment
313
RFSOII7PIOPI NO. 91-'~'"R
A RESOIlIPION OF THE CITY mi1NCII. OF 'if0; CPPY OF RANaIO
CUCAbYNJGA, CALSECHd7IA, AOOIfi1NG A PAIA'BJG IIJE0RCII+1fN1'
BAII, SCiiEDUI,E
Wf~2FA5, the City Cwncil of the city of Rancho Clxanp[ya has hereto-
fore decided to process parking citations issued by the San rt+rna,+t;nn Canty
Qleriff~s Departtmnt within the City's corporate limits; and
[mss, recent State legislation, specifically SB 21, AB 544 and
AB 1297, the County has hesn authorized t~ mllect $5.00 for every parking
violation in which we collet; and
WfR1tEa1S, the $5.00 which is to be collected by the Canty is split
$2.50 for ta~poraxy c~sthouse mnstn~ction and $2.50 for crimi.,ai justice
facilities ooretrvction; and
WHERFIS, the above-referenced State legislation authorizes the cities
to increase the bail ~^^~*~~e for parkirg violations to cover the State
marclaterl acts; and
WfR~I2FPS, the City of panci~o Gticamorga will be liable for this $5.00
charge with air parking enforcemnt bail schedule is ;rr~,-oasort or not.
NOW, TilEI2EEDItE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SExTiai 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
adopts as its tail scherhile, the bail schedule attached hereto as Dhibit '~A^
together with each bail amount set forth therein.
SECTION 2: 'Ihe bail schedule set forth in Ddiibit "A" attac2~ed
hereto may be modified from time to time bl' resolution of the City Cauicil of
the City of RariMno Cucamo~xJa.
I55
Resolution No. 91-***
page 3
EHIiIBTP °An
RCMC 10.44.020(A)
RQ4C 10.44.020(B)
FKMC 10.44.020 (C)
RQ4C 10.44.020 (D)
RQ4C 10,44.020 (E)
RCMC 10.44.020 (F)
RQfC 10.44.020 (G)
RCMC 10.44.020 (H)
R(MC 10.44.030
RCMC 10.44.040
RQ4C 10.44.050 (A)
RCt4C 10.44.050(0)
RQ4C 10.44.060
R(1$C 10.44.070
RCMC 10.44.080
RCd4C 10.44.090
R(NC 10.44.100
RCA1C 10.44.110
RQ4C 10.44.120
RQ4C 10.44.130
RCMC 10.48.010(8)
RCMC lo.as.olo(c)
RR4C 10.48.020
RCMC 10.48.030
RQ4C 10.48.050
RCSfC 10.48.060
Pazkirg on Divisional Tslard
Blorui TMTM a Wallcway
Posted No Pazkiig
Prohibited Parkirc3 Red Curb/Sign
Parkitg in Pazkway
Pasted No Parking~onstnlction/D3uigt~ent
Within 20' of Crosswalk in Business District
Within 20' of Traffic Co~rtrol Device
Obstruction of Traffic
Obstructing an Alley
Pazkifg Vehicle for Sale
Repair/Wash vehicle on street
Posted No Parking-Adjacent to School
Posted NO Pazking-Narray Roadway
Posted No Pazkirg-One Way Street
posted No Parking-Ore Way Paadway
Parking on Grades in excess of 5$
Vendirg from Pazksi Vehicle
Posta3 No Pazkingli'en~orary
72 Has Pazking Violation
Parking in Yello.~ Zone
Pazking in white Zone
Stopping for Ioadi~g/Unloading
SYoppirg in Alley
stopping/standing-Buses/Taxicabs
Hus and Taxicab Stands Restrictsi
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.70
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30,00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 70.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
'..~~
Resolution No. 91-***
Page 4
RQAC 10.50.130
RCI4C 10.52.020
RCMC 10.52.050(A)
RCMC 10.52.050(C)
RCMC 10.52.060 (A)
RCMC 10.52.070
RCMC 10.56.010
FQ4C 10.56.020
PQ4C 10.56.030
ItQ4C 10.60.050
RCMC 10.64.030
Ra4C 12.04.010(F)
NC 22502 (A)
NC 22507.8 (A)
NC 22500.1
NC 22515
UFC 10.207 (K)
NC 21113(A)
Permit Parki=g $ 30.00
Time Timit Parkvg~Yeen Zone $ 30.00
Over Weight-DtCeed 5 Tons $177.00
Over Weight-Exce~is 3 Tons ar 80" $107.00
StorilKJ Unatta~l Trailer on Street $ 30.00
Parking on Private Property $ 55.00
Unrestricted Truck gouts $177.00
gey-tricked 71vc~c Rprte $177.00
~Ihrminel Aocess RPlte $177.00
Harclicapped Parking $105.00
Parking R.V. m Street 2:00 a.m. - 6:00 a.m. $ 55.00
Illegal Parking-City Parks $ 30.00
Unlawful curb Parking $ 30.00
parki=g in Handicap Stall $105.00
Parki.rg in Fire Iane $ 55.00
Parking within 15' of Fire Hydrant $ 55.00
Obstkvct Fire Access Road $ 55.00
Unauthorized School Parking $ 20.00
/~
l'dTY VC' Itv1NCHV CUCAMUNVA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 16, 1991 ^.
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council w1,
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager -
r
FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City EngTneel-- j1~Q'
BY: Joe Sto fa, Jr., Associate En~4~feer
SUBJECT: Removal of Consent Calendar Items:
D-8 - APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY FDR A
PORTION OF 25TH STREET, LOCATED NEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE
(APN: 225-082-01)
0.9 - APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
iWROVEMENT SECU RITlES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT N0. 14139, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WITN AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS AND NATT
INLAND EMPIRE, INCORPORATED, FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT NOS. 14139, 14379 AND 14380, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING
M4INTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14139
LOCATED ON THE SOUTFMEST CORNER OF 25TH STREET AND ETIWANDA
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS
D-30 - APPROVAL OF MNP, II~FROYEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 (TENTATIVE TRACT 13527) JOINT
II4°ROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WITH MATT
INLAND EMPIRE, INCORPORATED, AND AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS FOR
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379, 14380 AND
14139, DRDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE Of 24TH STREET, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE
SUBMITTEp BY NATT INLAND EMPIRE, INCORPORATED
Please remove Consent Calendar items D-B, D-9, D-10 from the October 16,
1991, Gity Council Agenda for discussion to continue Lhe Items unt11
November 6, 1991 to allow time for additional information to be obtained
by the Developer of Tract Nos. 14139, 14379, and 14380.
NJO:JS:dlw
^CT-i5-1991 1207 PPM K 5 U TO 17149876499 P, 01
KAMINE, STEINER 8 LINGERER
ewvrol
11COVP1,J 3. 4PM~NL )LO iO'J'v ~CVLnOP L'nC[T LVi'L iIO
u,! aNacn cn 1,05 wrvG[LeS. CALIFORtiip 90011
..en'N o~_o.v r~NPV we
rP. am o>L-oval
October 15,1991
Linda Daniela
Deputy City Manager
Gty of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: KBR v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, et al.
San Bernardino Case No. OCV 42535
Our File No. 042.OD4
Deaz Ms. Daniels:
)~C'v [!
~vAV [ ~•
Or COV\f{LC
Sent uia fez
(7T4) 987499
At the mandatory settlement conference held on Ocrober 9, 199., KBR agreed to
accept $50,000 in settlement of this case. City's contribution would be $10,000, with
the balance coming from Recreation Systems, Inc. (RSI), the architett, and Tohn
I.enzirti & Assodates (LENZINI), the electrical engineer. This firm recommends
that City accept this settlement for the following reasons:
KBR'S LEGAL THEORIES
Trial of this action is set ro begin on November 11, 1991. KBR sued City for
inverse condemnation, interference with cotttract and violation of statutory rights
(KBR also sued City Eor quantum meruit. Ilowever, that cause of action was
dismissed against city when K1iR settled with Shooter dr Butts and American
insurance on the delay claims) These causes o£ action ate based on City's refusal
to accept KBR's submittal of WIDELi'IE as an equal to the ABS sports lighting
systems speafied in the plans and specifications Eor both Red Hill and Heritage
Cunununily Parks.
The primary issue is whether WIDELITE is ar, equal to the ABS sports lighting
systems.
A major qucsdon has arisen over the operation msts for the two systems. Based
on the two manufacturers' published data, the WTDELITE system would have
been about $300,000 cheaper to operate over a 10-yeaz period. If true, that fact
would be a strong argument that WIDELITE was legally equal to ABS and thus
should not have been rejected. City refused to accept W]DELITE on the adv[se of
CCT-15-1991 1207 FRCM K 9 U TG
17149676499 P.02
Ms. Daniels
Page No. Z
Cktober 15,1991
its experts, RSI and LEN2LN7. (Neither RSI nor LENZJriI aze sued by KBR. City
was in the prornss of cross-clairning against both for indemnity. Those efforts will
be resumed should there be no setfleme:tt.) Therefore, should City be found liable
for unjustly rejntuig WIDELTIE, there would then be a separate trial on the issue
of liability of RSI and LENZIIv'I to City.
A settlement now avoids the costs of one, possibly two, trials. The KBR trial is set
as a 10 day jury trial. There was every indication KBR intended to have a jury.
KBR DAMAGES
KBR claims $130,765.58 as damages from City's refusal of the WIDELITE submittal.
This figure is the price difference between WIDELITE and the specified ABS
system and includes calea tax, overhead and profit. I-Iowevez, the maximum
recoverable by KBR is probably only $97,000 -the price difference not including
the sales tax, overhead and profit.
Should KBR prevail, it would be entitled to interest at 10'Y~ per annum from July
23, 1986 -roughly g29,25D on the $97,000 fi~,rn.
In addition, should KBR prevail on the inverse condemnation claim, it could be
awarded attorneys' fees.
A settlement now avoids the danger that City may lose and therefore be liable to
KBR for about $126,250 in damages.
COSTS 7'O PROCEED TO TRIAL
There aze 8 depositions presently scheduled in this case. Attorneys for City would
have to appeaz at each. In addition, KBR indicated that it will also take the
deposition of City's 2 expert witnesses, Jce Pitaro and Henry Schiffer. Mr. Pitaro
uid lvir. Bchiffer are employees of ABS. Bvth live and work in ConnetHeut. It
would be City's burden to pay foz their air fare to and accommodations in Los
Angeles for their depositions.
in addition, counsel for City would have to prepare documents packages for the
experts to review. Also, counsel would have to work closely with experts to
determine how best to present the evidence at trial. City would be incurring not
only attorney fees, but the costs of the experts to review ali data.
OCT-15-1991 L~08 FROM K 5 U TO .7149676499 P.03
Ms. Daniels
Page No. 3
October 15,1991
In addition, counsel for City would have to prepaze for and parddpate in the 10
day (possibly longer) jury trial.
The coats of the depositions, experts and trial would far exceed City's proposed
$10,000 rnntribution ro the settlement.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Very truly yours,
Cathertne R Finamore
l1CF:cbm
~ Jim Markman
sent via fax - (714) 9906290
Cc
Raymond D. Atkins
11385 Napoli Dr. ~_rl
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
714-989-7049
OCT p 3 1991
October 18, 1991
Ms. Debra J. Adams
City Clerk - City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 607
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729
RE: RV STORAGE - VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY
Dear Madam:
Attending my first council meeting in Rancho Cucamonga on October
16, 1991, was an experience to say the least.
In regards to the RV storage public hearing the council has
extended patience in listening to everyone's personal "moan and
groan" such of which did not pertain to the sub-committee's
findings.
I apologize in not addressing this item in forum, however Z am
not a public speaker. According to the Chamber 90$ of the persons
in Rancho Cucamonga are not RV owners, yet developers in
Victoria, Terra Vista, Caryn sell 15-20$ of their residential
single family home lots, marketed and sold with additional
premiums, as RV lots. In these planned communities buyers pay
additional costs for the lots yet the lots are not conducive to
accepting RV's behind fenced yards.
Although they are marketed and sold as RV lots, the developer
provides plastic underground utility boxes which cannot withstand
the weight of a car, let alone an RV, also BO$ of the RV lots
rec~u ire access past a gas meter, which according to the public
utilities commission requires a guard post if an RV is to go past
the meter, (a post which the developer has not provided) yet the
developers stated CC&R's requirement of parking an RV is that it
is to he behind a fence on the side yard.
As everyone else makes this a private problem in forum at the
council meeting, I have spent two years trying to meet the CC&R
regulations on a lot that was supposed to be "an RV lot" of which
I paid a premium of $8,000.00.
I have relocated a tree, had the Edison company install concrete
underground utility boxes, and prior to move-in, and prior to
installation of the gas meter informed the developer, Republic,
that the meter was obstructing access to the side lot. The gates
for the RV access provided by Republic were 7'4" wide opening,
hardly access for a small car. I have even attempted to hop the
curb and scale the 2' embankment to access the side yard parking
Raymond D. Atkins
11385 Napoli Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
714-989-7049
on the other side of the lot. I requested the gas company to
move the meter closer to the dwelling and their only response was
No, to move an RV (including boat & trailer) or any vehicle past
the meter, the public utility commission requires a guard post to
protect the meter.
Z plan to qo back after the developer as I feel he has not
provided me with proper accommodation to achieve my RV parking as
required by ordinance.
Also, in regards Item 5, page 3, of the Staff Report issued to
the public on October 16, 1991, the "planned communities of
Victoria" are not planned to accommodate their own ordinance and
CC&R's. Grandfathering should be considered for the Victoria
Community and possibly Terra Vista and Caryn, or developers
should be held accountable for the profit over their delinquency.
n you for yo r ime in reading this letter.
a m D. tkins
1138 Napoli Dr.
Ranc Cucamonga, Ca 91730
714-989-7049
Cc.r, (3, 199 1
1'L:'rNNIN ryv l~.~v'~7:6:^11 •• IS F.CEIVEu -
1 .\
i:.l c ~. ~. .- ~-s>rrJ l~r+C _..ICIrM~ .J /-/} i "/ Oi R(~;i'I~Fl n~nnpgON JA
r4m Y:^ .• pyro'AN
OCT 14159
~.~,bs."~.~~ 1;=~lLZrr~<;J.F~. ~P_:a,c:£
' AM PM
7i8i9~1p~lli12111213i4i5i6
Ic rltE ~.~; `l ~.."H~C:+C ~-v.:Clr.'v)[~J /.J}
,. .,..-
,(,:. F..e:
~~ n ,.,~.I_ ,,,.ti ,`Iti,,~~,.,;,vr, 1;ivlsl.,d~ .. .
F`v~ai~fF'.
'u
- v 7n'~ n,.i i.3 lilt I-1-v'r,21.v/_ Dw' Tc /hvc rl+~Q
y:. rb;
O.u ~I ~., ifJ ~J:NaNI~=.
In"L I+IV ,.:_ I,1 J.' . 1/ I w I ~,d C.I{t ~-4 G'M+a c.J ~'F}- r-c IZ
/J I v ~ (~ ~ ?~41~ ~ (\-rJ ~ I, d /~, V
[- ~C U N ~ ~ 1-AT 1 14~ 'l.U 1i~i N I
1
~C. r_`(~'-/t 1~...J (a'
CI/.~I••(},~~:.E L,°9TrL ~C. T'ir ~r
F
l.. wf-_~1~C~._ i~.'~-I~.INb-
.~,:v i-i .!~~~;,.~ IS 1~P,C-~'T,~. {+~1.(= :j5 I T ~~ lJC eJ pi::L.. T'-.'\...
l.v~ I mil ii~~~~ ~~~I ~F~..11/~=..1i /\1/ W T Ji'Z.I .J( /~'J li
Il-~/r'1: ~,~~>~- .. '~/~: : 1'i:}/Z.It...ti~ ~.."lam 1~}C C.C :~.~ rl Lr_n.l
'-
r
c ;- ~~v~!li_~,,,~ :'t •~ID ~ [(~ SrC lZ ~i=F ,
CF' l:f_c.:Z:i.4-1en.A+_.
V~':+~;. t_(_S ItirUI_i/ Y\:'_•'_.S F-,J~i L:I}- .a.i l.)''r_. ;-"ic c. l?l'c.
1
1l :'i'I J TT I I~%~ i~T1r~~`.
.~A" 11.`'H.:•./ Ilcc ~/ rvNr}.3i T:'+,v'TS,
" y :~' ice`:. -i T'2L n)'r:.'~ IJ ~~ b~ `/t. I,1 I~r /~ c
1=~_ T :~a:~ T 11 ~_
.3.~ .,, /a= .. of D,:~n-Jc'_.= IL: I. u\,n r I,oG I_-<rL_,+r--rc.~;a r/
'~.~ ~ ,
,~ ~: I•.'1'L. i"~~,Z IL ..J L- /F,.. ,: arc 2q L-F
,4,.~~. J;lLI c. ,-<..'/
„~ ~ ,'7'
111 M.: 1. A~p:A 1 ~1
~ 1
1
"11`5'1 L.av tS ("J~K t'~
~ I, v a
- ;iEC eIJED -
~~' ,-.r r., ~~ :~ i0 ^ r,A"}Pry .F
^.p'.~. .... ,.,~arv
OCT 141991
October 11, 1991 7~gi9i10iUi121112i3~4i5i6
s
Planning Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Sirs:
I am writing to urge you to continue the enforcement
of the 1988 ordinance that prohibits the parking of
recreational vehicles on a reaident'e property. RV
parking in a residential neighborhood to unsightly and
would unequivocably lower real estate values. I would
never want to buy a home if I had to stare at an RV in
my neighbor's yard. My family and I moved up to
Rancho Cucamonga Lor a batter way of life. Wa want to
establish roots here. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
cannot afford to let these RV owners turn our City
into another Ontario or Montclair.
RV parking should be off-site and at designated
parking areas within the City. I'm aura the majority
of residents of this fine City would wholeheartedly
support the continuation of the above mentioned 1988
ordinance.
Thank you for your consideration to this matter.
Yours very truly, ~~
Mra.""N"a_nc~y"A. McBeth
11669 Mt. Miriah Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
QvJ~ J!J ~~
7-.~%+-~, R~ ~' ~.....~ .2~y°~"e~~-rte ~ .~y-~A-~aa+--~i
r./~((~~y i~~)~~ic A'~wi iv ~y~.J~-~ is /L.¢c i-e-a~'~er.-~
/L'C'4~~GL~CQi ~.. ~i0.W ~.Y d, ~/GC+ G'+/Ci-."~`'~nsZ'V
~Lca~ ~~` mac.-..-! ~o.>~`~~' -~~:.~ ~~~~f~ ~.-L~...%7`, .
~~ -'~~ ~J'-x.p~.~G+r7F~9O/ ?hoi~~ '~jK. Y,.d ~ dy~,,..~
~y,,.2~;c.-.i Gr~` ~.uJ'..~2-.s.~*-.L~~/Z¢-Ga-~ cF J.v7`/,2e.~.,..v
-76y~ ~ ~-
~, ~.~v
L~
- r~ECEIVED -
~ GTT vF JIiANC 0 VIIEI~t/0A
OCT 141~Y9_1"e~
71g1u
_. 1
- RICNVtC --
CITY Oi RgNCNO CtY'dMONCA
PLANNING DIVISION
OCT 141991
71~911~IUIIIi11218Nb5,8
RCcnF.fv CucamenyYi. flfGnru ~ (~~1.e ~ l v, l 9 91
Q,i`7`o ~G~cWx~p, ~~/!lr.~Y/t
/osz~o Cuwc ~.,.,evt ~~
J1anF/ro C(iC¢nVi~ir~:, C/~ 9r73U
;;Pe.. ,e Us
~G~ !IIZv .IIi~GU.r.~~:
~/~tctt~c.~aZ ?/_c/C~c~aa,~,o,y>uLZZ'u hc~-w.~~c~E~r,nc~[e~2.
ncl.Q~~rrltuP ~ nol,yncasf .e Us a~~e,rc~s~uny o~u-~~ew
~~a~~yi. o-(d ~~ c2~o' cp ~ ¢~e ¢n,0_e-~cru. .
~ c"he. GZV~ ~wirnq,7tG~ ~ n~ndcfir~ -~c**~
tee. -looiu. o-' ¢rc ~..~l~ico,na~~l6~cc>;~. ~yy Q2,~ a.Pao
,do c(C~n~G~acea~. ~/
J ~ JJ~
C(~i~cev aet2 G~L~ LuQO ~pG~ ix Ouc G~C~ ~, ~
3 y~ o-fd ilCrle ~ tuka cc! .~cdv OrC( du~~LhCto y.S~a.~
curia~ce_f+P Lvcr~CtGy~ ~ ~ Q ClLt . ~.,,~ vc,~ Lugo
~CGi~ ~/oc.6~d .9G~cn.~e. v+.~ur a~ ~ ~~a~Fi~.~ ~j
~ ,~x u(cme . ~J
~» rnarr - ~ U o~urtu~~ ~u7~ina. 6LV
au~~~c.~ ~~aa` ~ ~-ago-~ ,Pau.. a~ ~~e~ ~'
I, CJ ~@~,2 '' yy~''' '1 D~1EL 2rg( LIZ '~.lE ~ Grt~it sd~ O~ OG~2.
/~~Gc1A- LSO ~7~ ~tU ~p 7~~p'~ryclU'+ay ~tcrXr Q..SrinCG(7(~
~""~ ~ G~(/ ow~laoa~; '6~x` _P.~o~t ci„oc .2.r~ ~
n.(~ ~ yLU/.r, ,fie mac(, /b~/..~~~t a.Llawf~or~c ~ne.<<yt 6cs~(c~, ~6.
.`1~~-G~~`-~d ~. GN~.~`.CLi~'.~i ~ vt. olP~ ~zA, -/x -v PU.ItiGL .
.SC~~7Pr~` ~ G~cfNn ~(00 /~J ~~~', ~ Gt .S ~l ga!
Ste- d ~ a ,~atic~c w~:mlt, ux C/
~u~mm~ad:c~t~ ~U ~cz.~f~~.q. ' ~xu~e~2
~-~
<D ~J ~
~~ ~ 71.E 7`. ~ 6056 ,'f71Gt~Cla/.~(cq~9 Q,~uv~.AQ~ L'1+/~ 9~7~ZY7~7,/
~r~'rat~ L<JE,Bs~Q~ 1Pr// ~,/~///u1R/C-~_ Lp{Y,/~), ~f / ~7u29.(
art: pu}v.w~ ~ / ~dJ~ ~?/HL~//~ I ~~ZC f~'/~M% ~0 / / ~~~
ti 95~ 3 ga~.~.o-K ~ ~a Q~ ~ ~ q~-
~.~we ct~s '{'~i GPU Ourwa tx. Owl +n7rri~ld(R~0 /~~uy'I~~,(xr/ 1
7-29-90
Planning Commission
Rancho Cucamonga
GN Of ~e CEI4EC -
lCNO GJ^AAdONON
KA~.Ja'w DIN ).,.v
OCT 141991
I~MI py
7~8~9~gi11112ii12~3~4i$i8
1
Please reguast the Zebarths, 9602 La Colina, to move
their motorhome fTbm their driveway.
The enclosed sketch shows why this offensive motorhome
is such an "eyesore" and so visible to 20 families residing on
Klusman, When the trees shed their leaves the 6 families on La
Colina have a full viaw..as well as the 16 families on Jadeite
if they turn in on La Colina:
It seeps so very unfair of one family to think only
of themselves ------- with no consideraYTon or regard for anyone
else and to force others to look at that behemoth every day.
that offensive monstrosity should be parketl on the
side of their house and screened. If the Zebarths pie-shaped lot
can't handle this ----they should rent a lot fox it, It is truly
an affront to the envlornment, a visual "blight".
Please do not change this ordinance, Many towns and
cities in Northern California have had it fox years.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Forslind
(Mrs. Bruce Forslind}
~~ ,
' ~~
~_L LV ,1.L' _i;L,_'/ ~~r ...,_c2~ ~f~E. .r.fLc~C
/~
Cc lobar 1G, ': ;7?i
Tl~:::nir.~ -ivisior.
:'}' c` *:anchc C~,:canor.~a
3ez 707
3~rcho ^ucaronn,~ J. ,172y
]ear :: ... r.
- RECEIVE[ -
CITY OF R~•>:,; h10 CUCA•tUNOP.
PLF :giiM D!y1S!pIJ
OCT 161991
7~~~ll~a~91~5,s
. ~:ave lived at the ea-e address in rancho Cucnronga fer slnost 35
;;ears. i i:ve cored iotor Yomes since 1;6d and I have never :had
n?i ghLor comr lain of my parking ny 3.7. at bore,
::dv? -,r, i.Y, nad« <eey ry s.o torhome clear, and presentable and keep
..y ::^.ome and yarn :n a trim srd tidy manor.
. feel thet we do net need core regaations in this city :^, we should
h.xve aorie ri`as as to what we do or. our our property as taxpayers -s,d
ritizens of the co;:.muri t;' as long as we are not being offensive ;o our
neip?:bors.
e h+ve enougt: ordinances now that are r.ot Seing enforced such as
:. Just look at :ny nei~bcrhood and you will see old cars,
piles c" old furni tur=~ large n~bbis:^. piles accumulated
filled plastic trash babs« old refrigerators outside with
the doors or., trailers and etc. p have complained tc the
City Compliance officer to no wail,
?. °ome east ir:to the city of ~oothiil Blvd, and loo'¢ at ell
~he tumble weeds, yet orders Lard Ynere 1<_ ar. ordinance
letting tumble weeds grow in the ci*.y.
i. :v=done walks their does in the city parks and or. the city
sidewalds ~witheut picking uF if ter them.
^p.end soa.e Lime on 1>th treel, ;r.d li:aen to all the loud
radios (in the auto's) boo in, ay -:cd niyit.
:ith the wideni rg of ljth r'treet ir, frrr«. •~;~ souse the city eli::inated
zil street perking. Z eanrct get cy :,chcr~.cr? in+,e the rear yard.
v v: rking on a p;d to the side of ;, ,.~. ..,. :c. certa ir.ly not ho t4 eeing
rmven?. also pay al¢ost 71 «pCO.OC.p ,,•r in license f_es cr. rcy Ei.7.
a±orhoning is our 'nay of life snd it o?r«.:inl;r ~culd be n burden or. c,
`.c have to }l,ce it in atora_e .here i ~..,.:. _ ,, r.eintain it and {seep
_, up.
ppJ~~~aG~~.~•: •. ~..•~.
's ... ~YVf\~'^
if a rersc.^. puts 3n n. v, in :~i< Irons yerd ~~. r.d doee 'ro+, u:e it in a
rezsenab le tie pernais t%en =: reid?!bor is jua tified to conplain and ther,
..c tion should be t.=.ken. ccweverr if an ?. V. is in a yzrd wi tY. out zny
r,ox.F 1~i.-.'s then to=..` R,/, rn+ner -nC resident ahould he loft More,
=~eq::=stirs yocr ccn=ideration if we !:ave tc hzve spree kind of crdirance
ti~,.=.! ±r, ~c= eased on the abcve para~z%-ihs.
'.e=Fec rrgLLlly ti'' Ibr..i tt¢dr
t ~ (.1, ~ C t f7. j'.~-F jF. ~ j, ~~
Clar'<e P. 3oesen
.ij?; 1'; th ;tree`, aii..•a••'•,
~,n;^.c Cx .r:cn8?.:"^. 9707 ++"
OCT-18-91 WED 8:25 HOFFINGERS INDUSTRIES FAX N0. 17149800700 P. D1/0t
RECEIVEtl =
EIfiY bF RANCNb CUCA'1bN6A
P~ q'.h•NG CI VI $~p J
oct x c ~~
~~~
77x0 Celle Clarin
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
October 16, 1991
Planning Division
City oP Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
1tSt AMR1lLTIOMIL VlBICL! PIAIIIN A1~ aTt)A1Wt
Gentlemen:
We are adamantly agalaaL RV parking on residential property. They
are obtrusive eyesores in Pront yards and ruin the aesthetics oP
the neighborhood and our city.
Thank you for your consideration.
Si1n~c~er/ely~,/
Fred d. and Anna N. Acosta
FGA:ama
OCT-14-91 MON 13:38 COVENTRY MFG. P.01
COVE R P A G E
FAX TRAN3M I SS I Ole,
VOU ARE RECEIVING A TRANSMISSION FROM:
Mr. David P. Mobile
7867 Sauterne Driw
Rancho Cucaconga~ CA 91730 FX f81g) 338-8954
SENDERS DAVE MOBILE
NUMBER OF PAGES FOLLONING COVER PAGE: 1
DATES Oct. l4~ 1991
cx_-e assss_s____wvrwxzeavxawwwwwws~e__xxwrwwox_xsxa~
PLEASE PLACE THIB INFORMATION IN THE HANDg OFt
Mayor of Rancho Cucaoonga and
Mcmb ers of the City Council FX f714) 948-1648
ME93AGEt
Attached is a proposel regarding the Issue of racraational vehicle
storage on private property in Rancho Cucaconga.
I hope this helps in forcing sonw neN epp~oaches to the
i25Ue.
David P~
Resident
OGT-14-91 MON 13x39 COVENTRY MFG. P.02
October 14, 1991
TO the Mayor and wembers of the City Councilf
This letter is to express my opinion regarding the recent city issue
of recreational vehicle storage on private property in Rancho
Cucamonga, and to offer a possible solution.
The right to control one'f private Properly and the uses of it
should be protected in Rancho Cucamonga. It is a fundamental benefit
of property ownership to have a home and property that enables a
person to persue interests that would not be possible otherwise.
Convenient and affordable R.V. storage is one of theses benefits.
investment and financial security are also benefits of home
ownership. High and stable property values are the Daces for such
security, and the mechanism for erentin8 ^ cowsuntly that is stable,
financially sound. and a desired place to live.
One way to maintain stable property valuec is by regulationh~heough
the use of zoning laws and use restrictions. In this way. Y
government can mast strongly affect property values. Everyone in
Rancho benefits from high property values, R.V. owners and
norownors alike.
The greatest benefit for wll then comes from strong property values.
R.V. storage at residential properties does tend to lower property
vdiUe3.
w-eontinuedww
OGT-14-91 MON 36[00 COVENTRY MFG. P03
Tho qu¢ction then is how to ko¢p values hi8h tno Viaible R.V.
storage) while keeping R.V. storage convenient and affordable for
R.V. owners.
I think the following is worth consideration.
1. The Cily ordinances that no R.V. shall be visibl0 Prat tht street
fronting a residential property. This allows those with available
space to k¢ep the R.V. en th¢ir property while providing an
aesthetically pleasing cowwunlty.
2. The City provides affordable R.V. storage to residences only.
This can be done in one of !we ways (that I can think O4)i
1. The City contracts with private storages camapsnles within
the City to provid¢ lower 4hen aversge secure stgra9e for
residents' R.V. 's. Ecsentially, this Ss exisking public storag¢
subsidizetl by the City, but only for proven resitlmces.
Funding would com¢ from general funds, thus sharing the cost of the
storage among atl residences <who are the 6eneHCiaries).
2. Tho City establishes city yards for storage of residents'
R.V. 'c. These would be secure yards within the city liwlts. Tho City
could manag¢ the yards or hire a menegemMt company to do so,
similar ko management of an apartment cowplex.
Funding would come from user fees that are below-market for private
storage, and some etty funds. ThSS Nay too, ai! who benefit from She
off-property R.V. storage shore in the cost.
atvo RECEtYEO - n
FR4e,^.MO CUCl;~Anryq,p CC, (~p~pn,~
CLA,tir;bV[4 01~!511:N n
MR. Q MRS, BILL SMITE{ /~(7/lVY1(ry,p,~
~~ ~~ ~ GUCAMONGA`CALIPORN A 91990 -UX
S
10-~~-9j
~~. o ~ w ~~ 'x a~ c, ~ I
"tL.n. °~~.e-~.....,..~~ ~,d ~t~a moo, Gor-~~~. _k~ ~,,.#,-.~a.'~c,~r-~+~..
:.l.~.e.~.~ e,.~,,._ l~r...~se..` `~`-a'~n.. (_ata_~a...,.>> ~i.~.u>eo ~
l.r_~ +-~ __52.2.°c-°-~`--S`- ~ - Y.a,-~.
`~P'-E-a--'-*z yCA_`".,~ c~.`5~1;-. `^.,~ k4s~. Ic..-~,ti '~n~.,,..c~, n.te.~.~.~ ~:~.
r T-'° .~c.rl .~..`.n.c_. v~' ~ \L (>_ 2_, , ~ ~ScSi, nr.Ae~v-~.
c`,~-+..1 ~.c. ~.s., •~c~ 1 SU-a-tX t~ ~_ l~~ \~r_ ~1,w1 p, . ,.. r r~
/~..-e~`wk' G~ `mac ~~-st,,,--~-W 4- ~..~. -k~ ry~i,~. ~,r.~.G,~~6~".-'-^"-'o ~,J.~.~,v..,_~
Lrc-~L..',. ` _~.e t- ~ ~kL..~.. r~~.)c- ..ia o-r`.. 1+.1L_a..ti w~.1.5~. :sk •e-~.
tirL~; tU._4-~/,~ c1.-y~~ N Q ° c ~ ~ tG,~<K^a- ~w1 ct `_~,.`.o_ n-a~J e ~~ ~..a.u tti ,
~L.i ~.w-.•.r<- 4 ~.V+G M.Q.I.G~ \.l. 1~.~. ~, .• JCY~.L.,y~~.`~ ~~'r..fF\2..
~"c-~~ \lU\..~_~ S'.~~ ~l~- ~i [' -C- • /'_~.t~~--mow I.UIIS~SL v~Q\~
`(~-e-Q-S~-S .~ ~--a ~1~.~.k .~. ti.-~LL~k- -F- .1:.~_~_~~. ct _.~,v~~2.cro~a.Ji
tip. , fu~....;~ , .
_J ~,ac,~ c,~-cw~ . ~ Y UwV..o-,.. a-..tea.. tie.-t'.
/i~ ~-U <a_~J..~ CL. moo., ati.~ l..i.v~ l"l.U_ ~r V ~5 t Co~+A_
u
~.. <n,~.a.\,-a-ak ~~ A~ic.k L'La.t t~-d~.-o_ ~r_. `t~:i>> ~1("~x-}.-~~y+..n.r.1, .
Cit. t_Ci~. ~ l,tT~--.t. ~.-. C-u't~~Y~.a..~.`-E.. rte... ~x't.-(~ti~> C\ ~~~1.\n.lD-.X
.Y< al.c'~ t d..''r-... C.. cJ..i . J G~ 'L
`~} ~ tr~~c va _., a ..._ C~,~.•L+.~'t~ u.\.~-<..~. L.c,\."L-~c•.(. ~ tiyG~1.~ ~-Ca-c.•<. 'F~OJ
~,.c. \_.~ Ali v~.t.Ck ~..: I 't'a e(_<• ( .~~-.ia ,,t„ (Y....,) _~~LnJ ~a..a~`., f~n~~..
'~~c\~ ~~•~. ,.r~ ,I~<I te.L(~ Cr,L. ~k.~r 'a- ~-~~ ~_ dc~ e~.'Jr - r--a-ye~
vc \. ~. l-~• ~L. ~ lr~ 1, ... Ilya.' lti.~'-..:z fic~ l~. ~ c ` ~v~. ____ w`r_a~,~ .~~-~j~
L a.~ i' \. ~1.i,... Il L'. v `.~~~.~..~1ti1..i L~G~~ lUa wk -~l~J{ ~J-c..^ i.(.a,..~ -~-fit-.. ~-Ct' 1_ _`
.~1\v\.c. `L ~' Lc1 ~.\~-.t li+,<-.r\ '~C. ~,l-Z@. 4.-{Y,~..'^..t}~aa..~_! 4'~~
/~) ~ ca. vii.I ..,I,a.a (~~.~ ~', ~ 1~cL~... I'~ L ~c,v.~C. ~{ 1.~.-¢0` /lb ~.1C Lr"[,t,4.< a..a.4w
"` ~ {~[l'r-.~ ei. \...L C~W /}e~ t-r-K..~.Y+r /YY.c-lw~-l. v„i~~-a+~ l,~ 1"~~\t+\.
1 { ~ \
K4,..,_a ow X14\ ~.elw\.e~ .
R- a ~~ ~5
E~ E841t DxaczosDma a.c. 623.1
MENOmANDOII TOS city Council/
raomt city Attorney/Agen~eursae3~.~i~
DASa~ /~ -/E- g/ comrxnamrxA*•
a6s Authority for Executive Session--
Government Coda Section 50956.9
Ws recommend an executive session to discuss the
following litigation/potential litigation matter.
The legal authority for conducting an executive
sesaion is pursuant s
[ Government Code Section 5{956.9(a)
[Pending suit]
[ 1 Government Coda Section 50956.9(b)(1)
[Claim tiled or other exposure to litigation]
[ ] Government Code Section 50956.9(b)(2)
[oiecuseion on propriety of executive sesaion]
[ ] Government Code Section 50956.9(c)
[Potential initiation of litigation by client)
[ Title of litigation/case number or name of claimant
or other identifying statements
[~" Diewssion of potential settlement in the above
matter in open, public sesaion will, in our opinion,
all prejudice the Citye/Agency•s position and/or that
others of its amployeee. A Lull and frank diacuesion o!
the matter is required in executive session.
[ ] Full end trank discussion o! the need to initiate or
to decide to initiate litigation is requirefl.
S19S6.9 (o) Counsel mutt diecues the matter with Council/Agency
only in order to determine the desirable approaches/goela
of litigation. Any such discussion in public would
hamper end/os prejudice the City s/Agency a ability
to appropriately litigate the matter.
s~sou~seeucn