The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/11/06 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCII. AGENDA CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. November 6, 1991 Civic Center Counal Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •~~ City Councihnembere Dennis L. 3taut, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councdmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Counci[member w~ Jack Lem, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PA =~5 City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 1 All items submitted for the City Couneil Agenda moat De iv writivg. TDe deadline for auDmitti¢g these items is 5:00 p.m. on tae Wednesday prior to tae meeting. Tha City clerk's office receives all such items. A. C LL TO ORDERORDER 1. Aoll Call: Buquet _, Alexander Stout _, Wil liame _, and Wright B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 0. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time end place for the general public to address the City Council. Stste law prohiaite tae City Council from eddre as ivg any issue vot previously included on the Agenda. The Ciiy Council may receive to alimony sad set tae matter for a subsequent meetivg. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine end von-controvere ial. Taey will he acted upon by tae Council at one time witaout discussion. Any item map De removed by a Councilmembar or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: Octoaer 16, 1991 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/16/91 and 1 10/23/91 and payroll ending 10/10/91 for the total amount of $1,881,310.79. 3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice ii Inviting Bitle" for the Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka antl Santa Fe Railroad crossing (P.U.C. No. 2-96.7, to be funded Er om Syet ems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8851. PA E r } City Council Agentla November 6, 1991 l~ 2 RESOLUTION NO. 91-314 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA THE HAVEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA ANO SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING (P.U. C. NO. 2-96.7, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS 4. Approval of Resolution No. 91-012F to extend Comca6t 16 Cableviaion'e Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012F 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN eERNARDIN0 FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON E%PIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5. Approval to destroy records and documents which ace no 18 longer required as provitled under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 91-315 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER RF.QUI RED AB PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 b. Approval to authorize the assignment of an Adult $] Crossing Guard at the intersection of Bougainvillea Court and Peach Place for Windrows Elementary School. 7. Approval of a Resolution supporting a Ballot Measure to 6j repeal Booking Feev author izetl by SB 2557. RESOLUTION N0. 91-316 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNZ A, SUPPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE TO REPEAL EOORING FEES AUTHORIZED eY SB 2557 PAGE {~_'x/Jm~] ~~~J,.r -"~y" City Council Agenda ' ~~-l{Yr' l'/( November 6, 1991 3 8. Approval to summarily vacate Orchard Avenue from Terra 63 Vista Parkway east to approximately 220 feet southwesterly requested by Lewis Homes of California - APN: 227-151-27. RESOLVTION NO. 91-317 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF ORCHARD AVENUE FROM TEAAA VISTA PARi(WAY EAST TO APPROXIMATELY 220 FEET SOVTHWESTERLY - APN: 227-151-27 9. Approval o£ the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 69 Ii, for the proposed Vinmar Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. RESOLUTZON NO. 91-318 )~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O£ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THF. CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY 10. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and $3 ZI, for the proposed Calaverae Avenue 5t rest Improvement Project from Ninth Street is the Cha Efey Street Alley and issuance Of a categorical exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 91-319 BQ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFURNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIAONME NTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED CALAVE RAS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY 11. Approval o£ the Environmental Initial Study, Porte I and 97 IIr foc the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street alley and iaeu once of a categorical exemption therefore. PAGE JL City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 q RESOLUTION NO. 91-320 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SIERRA MADRE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTN OF CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY 12. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 112 II, for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Projects from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. RESOLUTION N0. 91-321 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INIT ZAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED AOCHESTEft AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAI PROJECTS FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE 13. Approval of Map, subject to fulfillment of the ]27 Conditions of approval and normal process ing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, for Parcel Map 13726, located on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Et iwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 91-322 129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 13724 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, WITH THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP SUBJECT TO FULFILLMENT OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, SUBMITTAL OF SECURITIES, ANO NORMAL PROCESSING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND CITY ATTORNEY 's. PA E City Council Agenda ~~ ^ November 6, 1991 5 14. Approval to award and auiho rizat ion for execution of 131 contract (CO 91-074) for Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project, located from Arrow Route to Ninth Street to K.E.C. Construction for the amount of $159,524.00 ($145,022.00 plus 108 contingency) to be Em~ded from Community Block Grant Account No. 28-d333- 8951. 15. Approval of Consultant Contract (CO 91-075) for Day 135 Creek Mello-Roos Diet rict (84-1) Refinancing. 16. Approval of ^iepoaition of excess property fora portion I$$ of 25th Street, located west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN: 225-082-01). RESOLUTION NO. 91-295 139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERA TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIHZT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEAESN 17. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation 144 Agreement, Maintenance Agreement for on-site temporary detention bee inr Improvement Agreement antl Improvement Securit iee for on-site public improvements for Tract 14139, Joint Improvement Agreement and Imprevement Securit iee with Ahmeneon Developments and Watt inland Empire, Incorporated, for off-elte improvements for Tract Noe. 14139, 14379 and 19380, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance DietrLct No 9. 1 and 7 for Tract 14139 located on the soot hweet corner of 25th Street and Et iwanda Avenue, submitted by Ahmanson Deve lopmenta. 11 PA E ~P~-~1,,;;..,,)) 99JJ,~,~~igY ~M{~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1993 6 RESOLUTION NO. 91-296 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, 10INT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND THE FINAL MAP OF TRACT 14139 RESOLUTION NO. 91-297 147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATTON OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAZNTENANC£ DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOA TRACT 14139 18. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation 150 Agreement, Maintenance A9reemepi £oY on-site CempOrdry detention basin, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Secur it iee for on-site public improvements for Tracts 34379 and 143E0 (Tentative Tract 135T7), Joint Improvement Agreement and Improvement Secu ritiee with Watt Inland Empire and Ahmanson Developments for off- alte improvements for Tract NOS. 14379, 14380 and 14339, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Noe. 14379, 14380, located on the north aide of 24th street, west of Et iwanda Avenue submitted by Watt Inlantl Empire, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 91-298 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORAPY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF 1'AACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 PAGE ~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 7 RESOLUTION NO. 91-299 154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14399 AND 14380 19. Approval of Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement 162 submitted by Lewis Development Company, Lewis Homes of California, and Western Land Propert iee. 2D. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 169 Tract 13566-3, located on the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue, submitted by Century American. RESOLUTION NO. 91-323 17~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-3 2i. Approval to execute Smprovement Agreement Extension for 172 CUP 88-18, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Divereif Sea Properties Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-324 173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC90 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CVP 88-18 22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 175 Parcel Map 11838, located on the northwest earner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by the William Lyon company. RESOLVTION N0. 91-325 176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND iMPROVEMENT SECURITY F'OR PARCEL MAP 11838 PAQE ( t~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 e 23. Approval to accept Landscaped Pedestrian Trail adjacent 178 to Tract 13440. 24. Approval to accept Storm Drain Improvements, Release of 179 Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13812 - Etiwanda Storm Orain, located on Et iwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance eontl $458,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 45,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-326 18~ A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13812 - ETSWANDA STORM DRAIN AND AUTNORI 2ZNG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 25. Approval to accept Improvement a, Release of Letters of Credit and Notice of Completion fot Tract 13813, located 181 on the west aide of Hellman Avenue 900 feet south of 19th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $ 76,000,00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit $ 7,600,00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-327 182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13813 ANO AUTHORIZING TfiE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 26. Approval to accept Impeovement s, Release of Aonds and 184 Not. ice of Completion for CUP BB-46, Located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $231,300.00 PAGE ~,',~~ ~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 9 RESOLUTION NO. 91-328 18$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 88-46 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORR 27. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Letter of 186 Credit and Notice of Completion for OR 87-48, located on the south Bide of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $ 61,000.00 RESOLUTION NO, 91-329 187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-48 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORT( 28. Approval to accept the Base Line Road Street 188 Improveme nte, Storm Orain and Tcaff is Signals Improvement Project, Contract No. 90-008, located from west of Victoria Perk Ldne to Weat of Interstate 15, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the Clty Engineer to Eile a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO, 91-330 189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CllCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CONTRACT N0. 90-008, AND AUTHORS ZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 29. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee eontl for Tract 190 12643 located on the ecuth side of Netherlands View Loop at Calico Peak Place and Antler Peak Court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 11,800.00 PAGE City Council Agenda n {',~ NOVember 6, 1991 ) to 30. Approval to releaee Maintenance Guarantee Eond for Tract 191 135$6 located on the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop at Mt. Harvard Court antl Mt. cambr idge Court. Aelease: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 12,800.00 31. Approval to releaee Maintenance Guarantee Bond foi Tract 1355] located on the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop 192 at Mt. Sherman Court and Mt. Waverly Court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,050.00 32. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13650, located on the southeast corner of Foothill 193 Boulevard and Baker Street. Aelease: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 21,907.00 33. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 194 13810, located on the north aide of Hillside Road at Ram Court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 17,445.00 34. Approval to confirm contribution in memory of Caryn DLIOr io. 195 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordineacee have had public hea rivge at the time of first reeding. Secovd re edinga are expected to ba routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Couacil at oae time wilhcut discus sion. The CLty Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of thr_ Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the standartl size parking apace to 9 feet by 18 feet. `„. PApE s. ~~~~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 11 ORDINANCE NO. 462 (second reading) 196 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12 OF THH RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES AND REDUCING THE STANDARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO 9 FEET BY 18 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking apacee. ORDINANCE NO. 463 (secontl reading) 200 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SOPPORT THEREOF P. ADVERTISED PUBLIC REARINGB The following items hove been etlverticed end/or posted ec public heeringe as required by lew. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public tec tisony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF SAN BERNARDI NO COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3349 AS ADOPTED BY THE 201 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PERTAINING ^O THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PAOG RAM OF THE COUNTY OF EAN BEANARDINO pw E City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 12 ORDINANCE N0. 460 (first reading) 211 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, ADOPTING, BY AEFEAENCE~ ORDINANCE NO. 3349 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RVLES, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAADTNO, INCLUDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN FEES AND PENRLT IE5 2. CONSIDE&ATION OF RESOLVTIONB RELATING TO THE FORMATION 212A MFLLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (STAPF REQUC5T8 ITFN TO BS CONTINUED 1b NOVElIDER 20, 1991) 3. CONSIDERATION OF THE F00. ATION OF DRAINAGE AREA NO 91-2 213 AND THE LEVY OP ASSESSMENTS FOA COSTS OP MAINTENANCE ANO IMPROVEMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 91-331 21) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ANNllAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR A DRAINAGE AREA 6, nv BIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL 23 PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A AIR OUALTTY ELEMENT - CITY OF 4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - In accordance with the 1989 Air Quality Management plan, and Air 4uality element has been prepared for inc Lua ion as part of Chapter V, Public Health and Safety section, of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The amendment includes the expansion of the 9oale, objectives, and policies of the Air Quality, Circulation, Energy, and Implementation sections of the General Plan including prov ieions of the 1989 Air Quality management Plan, ae adopted by the south coast Air Quality Management District and the Scuthern ca lifornia Association of Governments. .a-.;,. ... PA E ~~~~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 13 RESOLUTION NO. 91-332 245 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A, FOR INCLUSION OP AN AIR QUALITY ELEMENT AS PRAT OF CHAPTER V, HEALTH AND SAPETY SECTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN, AND TO E%PAND THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE AIA QUALITY, CIRCULATION, ENERGY, AND IMPLEMENTATION SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MA%ING FI NOINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 5. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 2 2 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO J CUCAHONGA - A request Co add Section 17. 06.040P and Section 37.06.070E to the Development Code eatabliehing property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance requirements foi Multiple-Family Dwellings. ORDINANCE NO. 464 (firer reading) 285 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03, ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.040-P ANO A NEW SUBSECTION 17.06.070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE REQUIRF.HENTS FOA MULTIPLE- FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND MAEINC FTND INGS ZN SUPPORT THEREOF 6. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND Q$$ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA - A reque at to amend various development standards and des i9n gu idelinea for multi-Eemily residential districts. Staff recommends issuance of a N¢gat ive Declaration. i PA4E Ci[Y Council Agenda ^ November 5, 1991 CVI 14 ORDINANCE N0. 465 (f i[st reading) 36i RN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCAO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE [IANCHO CUCAMONGA HUHZCTPAL CODE, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDAA-5 AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOA MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTAI CT S, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONS IDERRTION OF ENV IRDNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AED TERRA ~$$ VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMEtDMENT 91-02 - CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA - A request to amend various development standards and design gu ideiines For multi-family recidential distr ictg within the Te[za Vista FLanned CoEmunity az ea. Si aff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ORDINANCE NO, 466 (fi[st readings 3$0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APFAOVING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AHE NDI NG VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR NULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTAI CTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONS IDEAATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT t,ND VICTORIA 2$$ PLAIJNED COMkVNI TY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCkiO CVCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-Family eesitlent ial districts within the Victoria Planned Community area. Etaf£ [ecommends issuance of a Negative 62C1a[at LOh. ORDINANCE N0. 467 (f iz st reatling) 392 AN OADINAN CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOV ING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT ST AND AROS AND DESIGN GVIDELLNES FOR NULTI-FAMIL'f RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TEfEREOF ~J~ ~. ~3~ ~~ ~\ ~~\DBLIc Cha are no , 9EARI~ $ C,` ~ } C~i~ pa of , n°i 1 n,ber ~ A9eDn \ a 199i 1$ s, Ary ORDt OR f/p sTgE\,FpE tRUCE. r N Ty OFr/RliO ~ 45q T~`'IC -ccE'D'fJC Ra: °"~ T,, fPZi,st ~ ~JttS sPEeu orJCn sec.,TCRO i, cI, ream o,o,+slD^ ~. ri,-.°Z:, °'' zp ~o~'"o,r co;;.. °7/ C A$$E SNE`OlJ OF $ O,/ COQ nReoAOZp ~~9 C/LIROF ThE \J RE$ IfJ C+. rrG '~4E RyI ~I$TRI OL nTI ! S, Pk: U PTI f;C R' A Re$G Ci Bc ~JS..Ra,R a~IS~ FAC ~O Re LDTIO, \:,rrG CITY SG°uT b0 ~IG PAS GF z°~+ ~: c,rSrJ .,p orJ ParJ~ ~ rq~ t E Uc CI^Y .: TIMe J7r,'pS pLp CF r~ R R~P PJ;,/ ~°A CO,;;:Cott GF A RE ResGLGT ,OR PnDP~O;~t' hIRE ~r CFGRTJIAyE~ ADOTy SOFDTtO,.r IO,y fJG S HeRRIrG $ETTtNC R, BpDIP~ARy7<$ ARR,~ ~~ Ty C Ct 1 '34 A R ,S GP A SPFCj yO:v ~~f'OA ~O~"C::: G . A Rn GLUT RL AS Ti! /fI,IF b TJ: Crl4 $GL/T tGrJ r: s"S$~4[-~ P. GRr/~ E O. ~ IOiJ G ..:/I. RGPO ~, I /$T ARIrJC RAtJC F ^h. °...~a$ DI$TPI$e;J A N ' E C LORI( OS O RIO J OF F,TIO ChROT'r ~Gt~.N T gEC, TG .S'gE$ CE :J .,.i. CI` Ag CFIT dg $.HE~. R,;V, >n C':'. GF .. 4 T;iER .S:SED DE$C GRE „T DI$;R Ir'PRG„ °afJn'FG~,..Z HE ROryps Op: A+CG PRYet1JOH~1l I ~C. % Df~ i~,, S S7 °' PRO /ICr~~C O$T ~n'Sttr+' GaJ.°T/IRA FGR A„~ C' "/ARt. TJIE e.7p~G Dt. 'ss'ngrJ `~sE$. O„ Apst, re~ea yn~g 4 j~~ 4/3 41.5 416 4~4 4~2 The t r Pue4vy elloNi 61y t sttgon T'hems C~._ Y. P11OE ~~~y~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 IC.JI 16 H CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimoay, although tbs Chair mny open the meeting far public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT THE DRAFT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT QZZ PLAN AS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF THE HAN BEANAADINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS IN THEIR ROLE AS CONGESTION N GE NT AGP.N Y FOR SP.N HERNAADINO COUNTY AND AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING REPORT I. COUNCIL BDSINESS The following items bnve been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are no! public hearing ileac, although Lhe Chair say open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. J IDENTIFICATION OP ITEMS FOR NEXT MEET INO This is the time far City Couacil to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeGin9, These items will not be discussed et thi¢ meeting, only identified for the next meeting. R. COMNVNICATZONS PROM THB PUBLIC This is the E1me and place for the general public to address the City Couacil. State law prohibits the city Council from address in9 any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent veal ing. Comments era to ba limited to five minutes per individual. 1. RE UEST FR M ROHER OL RI O 5 EAR EGARD NG THE PARE Q33 AND RECREAT ON COMMISSION R COMMEND TIONS SC EDU ED FOA PUBLIC NEARING ON NOVEMBER 20. 1997 r': °=' ~~ PA E ~ ~`~~ City Council Agenda November 6, 1991 17 L. ADJOIIRNNENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO ESBCUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION NITU AMERICAN INSURANCB. Ir Oebra J, Adama, City Cletk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 1, 1991, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. October 16, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reau lar Meet ina A. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Stout reconvened the City Counc Ll at 7:12 p.m. with all Counc ilmembers present, after previously reressing during the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Managea-; .lames Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner; Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dan James, Br. Civil Engineer; doe Schultz, community SBrvicea Direet or; Paula PaChon, Management Analyst Ii; Jim Nart, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; ChieF Der.n is Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce ze finer, Rancho cu camonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of PYOClamat ion to the Rancho Grande Kiwan is in Recogn ition of the Award Received fora Scholarship Program in conjunction with the Community Services Department. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Earl Miller of Rancho Grande Kiwanie. B2. Presentat inn of Proclamation Observing Red Ribbon Week, October 19 -27, 1991. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II. B3. Presentation of Proclamation Obse rv irg California Planning Wee!:, October 20-7.6, 1991. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Brad Buller, City Planner, and Larry Mc Niel, Planning Commission Chairman. eb. Announcement of Red Rihb on Week Special Community PY esentat ion on Substance Abuse: Signs, Symptoms and Prevention. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 2 Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II, announced buttons have been passed out as part of the Red Ribbon Week campaign. She also invited everycne to a special program hosted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and RCCASA to take plzce on Thursday, October 24 at Vineyard Nigh School. She atlded Mayor Stout and Cou ncilmember Bu qv et will also take oa rt in the program, x « w . . w C. COMMUNICATIONB FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR ,7a ck Lam, City Manager, asked that items D8, D9 and D10 be continued to the November 6, 1991 meeting. D1. Approval of Minutes: September 18, 1991 October 2, 1991 (RU qu et absent) ^2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/25/91, 10/2/91, and 10/9/91; and Payroll ending 9/26/91 for the total amount of 52,628,266.97. D3. Approval to receive ana file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 1991. 04. Alcoholic Beverage Application Eor O£f Sale Beer 6 Wine for Village Mini Mart, Harie Ham id, 7270 Victoria Park Lane. ^5, Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer 6 Wine for Unnamed Business, Theodore 5. De Bonis, Bi11 B. Faub ion, and Lomenich Rotella Jr., 10431 Lemon Street, Suite N. DG. Approval of Aeso lution declaring the results of a special election for CFD 88-2, Annexation Number 1 (Law Enforceme nth. RESOLUTION N0. 91-294 A. RESOLUT SON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONG A, CAI,I FORM A, CECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "HELLO-R005 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 7982" SPECIAL TA% ELECTION D7. Approval of a Trails Implement at ion: Plan, a comprehensive implementation strategy for hiking, eid ing and biking trails within the community. ITEM PULLED FOR DIS CIISSION RY COUNCILMEMEER ALEXANDER. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 3 RE SO LUTIOt! NO. 91-262 A RESOL'JTZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRAILS IMPLEk.E NTATION PLAN D8. Approval of Disposition of excess property for a portion of 25th Street, located west of Etiwan da Avenue (APIJ: 225-082-01). ITEM CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 6, 1991. RESOLUTION NO. 41-295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThiE CITY OF RANCHO C:ICAMONGA, CALI FORNiA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO DE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORS ZING AND CIAF.CTIf1G THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE TY.AT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO RE DELIVERED TO THE PE RSOCIS NAMED THEREIN D9. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities far on-site public improvements for Tract 14139, Soint Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities with Ahmanson Developments and Watt Inlantl Empire, Incorporated, for off-site improvements for Tract Nos. 14139, 14379 and 14380, o[dering the annexation tq Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 14139 located on the southwest cor r,er of 24th Street and Et iwanda Avenue, submitted by Ahmanson Developments. ITEM CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 6, 1991, RESOLUTION NO. 91-296 A REEOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR0VIC7G IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IM.P ROVE MEtJT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES PND THE FIt1AL MAP OF TRACT 14139 RESOLUTION f:O. 91-297 A RESOLUTIONI OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE A:JNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAiNTE NANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAiNTENAf:CE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14139 D10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities far on- site public improvements for Teaets 143'9 and 14380 (Tentative Tract 13527), Joint Improvement Ay reement and Im pr o•: ement Securities ::ith Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated and Ahmanson Developments fcr OfE-site improvements fnr Tract Nos. 14379, 14380 and 14139, Ord Briny the annexat inn tc La nd r.-ape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Noe. 14379 and 14380 located on the north side of 24th et re et, west of E[iwanda Avenue submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated. ITEM CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 6, 1991. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 4 RESOLUTION I:O. 91-298 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IN.PAOVEMEIlT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 AESOLVTION NO. 91-299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDEP.I NG THE ANNE%ATICN OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ] AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 1,3]9 AND 14380 DI1. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 antl 6 for CUP 91-11, located at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street, submitted by James antl Patricia Manhire. RESOLUTION NO. 91-300 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALS FORNTA, APPROVING IM PROb'E N,ENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY FOR CONC:TIONAL USE PEftM.I1' NO. 91-11 RESOLUTI OfI No. 91-301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA, CALTFORPIIA~ ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOP. CVP 91-11 D12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566-I, located on the south side of Summit Avenue between wardman Bullock Road and Cherry Avenue, submitted by RockEield Deve lopmene, RESOLV TI ON NO. 91-302 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, APFRO'JI NG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AI10 IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1 D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566-1 and - 3, located or. the south side of SummSt Avenue between i~nrd man eu llock Road and San Se va i.ne Road, subr,.itted b} The ca ryn Glom pony. RESOLUTI O!; NO. 91-303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND ZMPROVEI1ENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-1 AND -3 City council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 5 014. Approval to a%ecute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13727, located on the southwest corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue, eubmitied by Southland Development. RESOLUTION tJO. 91-304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORr;I A, APPROVING IMP P.OVEM ENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEN.E NT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13]27 015. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13753 Landscape, located on the northeast corner of ease Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue, submitted by the William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-305 A RESOLUTIONi OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENS ION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753 LANDSCAPE Di6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13812 located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Summit Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Watt inlantl Empire, Incorporated. RESOLUTION N0. 91-306 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C[1CAMONGA, CALI FORNiA, APPROVING IMPROVE M.ENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13812 D17. Approval to execute Smprovement Agreement Extension fcr DA 97-56, located cn the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by SCEn2Gn JE rSEy PdYL nErS. RESOLUTION N0. 91-307 A RESOLUTION OE' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%T F.NSION AND IMPROVEN.E riT SECURITY FOR DR 87-66 D18. Approval to execute Improvement Aoreemen^_ Extension for DR 89-14, located on the south side of Arrow Rcute East of Interstate-15 Freeway, submitted by Ampac, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 91-309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF RANCEIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY F'Oft DR 89-14 City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 6 D19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 12854, located on the west side of East Aven~.;e between Catalog St rn^q :,n.+ Victoria Street, 9ubm Ltt ed by Style Homes. RESOLUTION PJO. 91-309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCffi10NGA, CALIFOANiA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 12854 D20. Approval to accept improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 1242 D, locatetl at the southwest corner of Hellm ar. Avenue and 7th Street. Release: Faithful Performance 9o nd (Street) $300,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee 9ond (Street) 5 30,000.00 RESOLUTION tJD. 91-"<69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12420 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORK D21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13367, located nn the east side of Hellman Avenue at Highland Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5298,819.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Rond (Street) $ 29,882.00 ftESOLVTIUN NO. 91-310 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIPG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 1336] AND AUTIIORSZING THE FIL UJG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOP, TH£ 4:ORK D22. Approval to accept Improvement s, Release of fonds and Notice of Completion for 7645 Alta Cu esta, located on Alta Cu esta Drive be b.:een Camino Suc and Valle Vista Drive. Release: Faithful Perf nrmance Hood (Street) $ 3,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORNIP, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 76A$ ALTA CUESTA AKD AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETI O:J F'OR THE WORK City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 7 023. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12577, located at Pilgrims Court and 19th Si reet. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bo r.d (Street) $ 17,900.00 D24. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12969, located on Edwin Street south of Arrow Highway. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 11,300.00 025. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13445, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lare and Rochester Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee bond (Street) $ 72,400.00 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of items D7, DS, 09 antl D10. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Euquet, secondetl by Alexander to continue items D6, 09 and D10 to November 6, 1991. Mction carried unanimously, 5-0. DSSCUSS ION OF ITEM D]. Approval of a Trails Implementation Plan, a comprehensive implementation strategy far hiking, riding and biking trails within the community. Cou ncilmember Alexander stated he felt there needed to be a chanye to the Resolution, Section 1, No. 3, ty chanying the :oord "nor.-vehicular" to ^non- motorized" transportation. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Bu quet Co aopr ove Resolution No. 91-262 ae amended. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E, CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. FADVE RTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF RECREATIOtiAL VEFIICLE STORAGE - Review of Current City regulations affecting storage and parkiny of Recreational Vehicles on private residential properties. (Continued from August 21, 1991) Staff report presented by Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner. Councilmember Wright thanked everyone who had worked on the committee regarding this issue. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 8 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Beverly Choaas, 9609 Alr.ond, asked ::r. Kroutil for clarification on the grandfathering issue. She stated after leaving a prior committee meeting there were three proposals. one stated that everyone would be grandfathered if they met the safety specifications prior to 1988, the second had language that a person would no[ be grandEathered if they had the capability to put their vehicle in the backyard behind a fence, and the third stated there would be r.o grandf atherinq at a11. Otto Kroutil, ^eputy City Planner, stated that ae that meeting it was discussed which of the three alternatives would be presented to the entire City council. He stated it ended up being a combination which included points two and three. He added it would he like having vmo sets of rules in place per the Subcommittee's discussion. He stated one set o' rules •.uould apply to people who had their RV prior to 1988 which would have grandfather rights, and the second would apply to those people who didn't have any legal grandfather rights between 1988 to 1991, but because of the lack of enforcement erd notification and public knowledge, they would be given a break. He stated the third alternative would be not to grandfather anyone, and he did not think that was the direction of the Subcommittee. Martin Walters, 6409 xlu smart, stated he did not agree with item 3 of the Btatemect of Intent because of the expense it would create for him. Mayor Stout advised him that because of his particular si t.:at ion he Ee It Mr. Walters would fall within the to v. range of n•.e eting standards and might be able to eet a variance Erom the Planning Department. Mr. walters stated he was planning tc install a device on his RV that would beep as he backs out of his driveway, and added he is always very cautious when backing up. Charles H111, 9177 Devon, a res [dent si r.ce 1956, stated he cannot afford to park his RV anywhe ce but his home. He staled he ca miot meet the 30 foot setback requirement, but added his driveway is on the opposite side of the house. Jerry Sheridan, 1104 Carlo Court, inquired mh at the regulations were iE you do have your motor hone parked in a romr erci al lot, how long do you have once ynu bring it to your home to load rt. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Pianne r, stated as C!;e reyulat is ns now stand an individual has 24 hours. Nr. Sheridan stated he felt 24 bon rs [vas unreasonable and felt it should be changed to 48 - 72 hours. Cliff Taylor, '7045 Avenitla Leon, stated he has ce:ned his RV prior to 1988, but asked If i~.e bou g'nt a new mctnr home :: m[a, :eo~.ad he have to Eo 1.1 ow the new regulations. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 9 Councilmember Wright stated this issue still needs to be discussed. Jim Swift, 9258 Amethyst, stated he received a citation for parking his AV for less than 24 hours. Otto xrout il, Deputy City Planner, stated that ~.aas because he had parked his AV on the street which was not allowed. Councilmember Wright felt it should be looked into as far as parking an AV on the street overnight. Councilmember euquet suggested some kind of warning be given to let the owner know if his/her RV is not moved within so many hours, they would be given a regular cit at is n. Mr. Swift also mentioned that he has people visiting him that need to park their AV on the street, ar.d .'elt this could be a problem. John Maxim, Jr., 8165 Co rn o;all, scat ed he drives his RV to work and back and parks it in front and asked if that xas acceptable. Otto xroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated if he is driving it to work and back, that would be acceptable to leave it in his dciveway. Victor Crowell, 91'13 Estacia, expressed his concerns for bringing hie motorhome from a commercial lot tc his home to load it and the fact he does not have a 10 foot setback to the sidewalk. S. E. Winkleplac k, 9235 Hemlock, snared he would like his visitors who own RV's to be eble to park them on tLe street. Gloria Ybarra, 8611 La Grande, stated she does not have room to store her RV, and stated if she was r.o move ft to the other side of her yard she wou ltl have to remove trees which would require a permit to do so. Diane Yarloc k, 7968 Rosebud, felt it was not any worse to have less than 10 Eoot setback for visibility with an R'J than if you park next to a van in a shopping center parking lot. Sohn Mott, 7635 Cart a ia, commented on the 1C Eoot setback requirements. F!e brouyht up of Y,er suggestier.s far t'I:e Cir.y Cnuncll to consider. Dan Stucker, 9550 San Bernardino Road, asked for a show of hands from those who were opposed to tl•~e reg;ll at ior.e. Mayor Stout stated if this was to go on the ballon, he f.a r. BOk of the City would be in favor of the City's ordinance. Councilmember Bu qu eC stated the mail he has received from residents intlicates to him there are more people in favor of the ordinance than against it. City Council M.i rutes October 16, 1991 Page 10 Mr. Stucker stared he still felt there were a lot of people that did not agree with the Ordinance. He also commented about not being able to park his RV on the street. Mayor Stout informed him these issues would be looked at. Dave Brown, 9320 Placer, stated he can r.ot meve his RV to the backyard because of the location of his gas meter, and chat the Gas Company has advised him it cannot be relocated. Cou nc ilmember Buqu et suggested he go further up the line with the Gas Company to qet this accomplished. Victor Crowell felt it was more difficult to back up and see arow~d a camper than an RV. Gary McOOnald asked if the City council e,a nted to ban RV's altogether. Mayor Stout stated they are trying to get this worked out because he felt if they ditl not, he felt there would be a group of residents farming an initiative to go on the ballot to get RV's banned. Mr. Mc0onald stated he felt the Council was leading toed arils no RV's in the City for the future. .~nwrx Mayor Scout called a recess at 9:02 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:22 p.m. with all members o.' council pre senC. Bill Marls, 8630 ca lle Cerada stated he appl a~.~d ed the City Council for the work they have done on this issue. He thanked the City Council for what they have done. There being nc further response, the public hearing was closed Covncilmember Buquet stated he felt the long term overall issue was should RV's be allowed to be parked in driveways. He felt if changes are made to the Ordinance, it should be someth4~g that is reasonable for staff to enforce. Ceuncilmember AlexanrJer stated he felt there needed to be regulations to protect the rights or neiyhb ors. He added that in the past [here was not the money or the staff to en Eo rce the Ordinance oroperl y, [F.eeefore, these types of problems were taken care of as complaints ':'ere registered with v',e City. Councilmemher Height staged afro r, hear L-~g the people speak tonight, she feels there are still problems to be worked out. She felt if the Subcommittee takes the suggesticns made and comes back to the City Cou nc i] again to consider the new information, there will be atlditional eu9gestione brought up by the residents at that time also. City Council Minutes October 16, 1993 Page 11 Mayor stout pointed out there were about four isoues still to be worked out 1. The 10 foot setback situation. 2. Temporary parking on the streee while loading and wiloading an RV. 3. Visitation RV's parking in the street. 4. Parking an RV on the opposite side of a yard from the driveway. Hayor stout stated it is the City Council's responsibility to do whatever will be best Eor the City as a whole. HP stated he felt the approach the Suhcommittee Cook was reasonable. Councilmember Wright stated she would be williny to yo back and work on this again if everyone else agreed with that idea. Councilmember Williams informed the sou ncii of the work involving the Subcommittee for this subject. She felt the City Council should possibly eliminate grandfat hering altogether. Councilmember Buquet suggested the Subcommittee check with other cities as to how they regulate the RV situation. He felt the Council should be careful and not do a "quick fix." Councilmember Wright suggested the Subcommittee work on this matter again and come back to the Council in January with options. Mayor Stout asked that the ciey Attorney develop several ordinances with various options for the council to consider for aoproval in order to resolve this matter. ACTION: Cou nc ilmembers Wright and 41i 11 isms to do further work on this matter and come back to the Council at the first reef ins in January, 1992 which will include language from the City Attorney Eor development of an Ordinance. Councilmember Buquet suggested upda T.es he given periodically to the Council while this process is progressing. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he would work with Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner, and develop an ordinance by using the suggestions made at this meeting. Councilmember Williams felt she would like to get n;ore public input as the committee meetings start up again. F2. C NSIDEAATION TO VACATE REID AVE~lVE - A request :o vacate Reid Avenue, locat e9 south of Main Street and east of Archi ba 1d Avenue. Staff report preser.C ed by Uan James, Sr. Civil Enyinee r. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There be ir~g no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes October 16, 2991 Page 12 RESOLUTIONI NO. 91-312 A RESOLUTION OF THE CSTY CODN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL•CAMONG A, CALIFOANI A, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF RE ID AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Huquet, seconded by Alexander co approve Resolution No. 91-312. Motion cast ied unanimously, S-0. ITEMS P3, F4, AND FS WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE SNfE TIME F3. CONSIDERATION of CONDITIONAL USE PERP'^ 78-03 - SATf'S PLACE - Considerat ior. of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke Conditional Use Pernit 78-03 far the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant located in the Neighborhood Commercial Cistrict at 6020 carnelian Street, northwest cornet of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APR: 202^812-56 through 60. (STAFP REQUESTS THIS ITEM HE CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 20, 1991) Mayor Stout stated these had been a request ny the apps llant's legal counsel to continue this item to November 20, 1991- MOTION: N,oved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to continue the matter to November 20, 1991. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENOMEPIT TO CON OI'CIOiIAL NSE PF.RNiT, 78__03 - SAM'S PLACE - Corsideration of an appeal of the Planning Cemmis sion's decision to deny the request to extend the hcu rs of operation and amend the condition of approval prohibiting live entertainment for a.^, existing Best aurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 662C Caenelian Serest, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 20i-S:1-55 <:'.ro aoh 6G. (STAFF REQUESTS THIS ITEM 8E CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 20, 1991) Mayor Stout st a<ed !here had been a Bequest by the appellant's leyal counsel to continue this item to Nov ember 20, 199;. MOTION: kcved 67 Alexander, seccn detl L-y Fh'iyht to coat inue the matter to Nov ember 20, 1991. Mrt icn care ied unanimously, 5-0. F5. CONSIDERATION OF ENSEP.'CAINI;ENT PEP.;;;: 91-C2 - SA_'S YLAC - Consideration of an Appesl of the P1annLng Comm iseior,'s decision to demo the request to cond~ot live entertaLnment in conjunction '.'.^.h a re st aurn zt and bat located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6520 Carnelian Se teat, no et hwest corner of 19th antl Caenelian 5<re ets - APN: 20i-011-56 t'nrough 50, (STAFF REQUESTS TNIS ITEM BE CONTINUED TO NOVEMEER 20, 1991) City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page 13 Mayor Stout stated there had beer. a request by the appe ilant's legal counsel to cone inue this item to No vecnber 20, 1991. HOT10N: Moved by Alexander, seconded by M; fight to cone inue the matter to November 20, 1991. Motion carried ',:nanimcusly, 5-0. ITEMS F6 AND F7 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIFIE. F6. CONSIDERATI O`1 OF ENV IAONM°NTAL ASS'S S;AES2 AAL DEVELOPM3NT COD£ AMENDMENP 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA - Conside rat ior. of a reaue st to amend Tit 1e 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Aancho Cucamonga Municipal code to eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 8.5 Eeet by lA feet. staff report presented by Bruce euckinyhan, Planning Techniv ion. Mayor Stout stated he had read so;rswhere in the repot that theee had been an analysis done on the square footage fer parking spaces under the various alternatives. He asked what would happen iE Utey is ft the length at 18 Eeet but increased the width to nine feet. Bruce Auckingham, Flanning Technician, st atetl they are ail Pretty close in square tootages, but tlid not think it would aFf ect the larger parking lot as much as it would a smaller lot. Counc ilmember Buquet stated he agreed with the 9 Eeet x 18 feet parking spaces as suggested by Mayor StOtit. He stated C9 was net in favor of compact Parking spaces, and f_lt people abuse them. Ma nor Stout stated he would feel better sheet haviny the spaces 9 feet x 18 feet. Counc ilmember Alexander stated he felt B.5 feet oa de taould be adeguate because he felt if someone is not going Lo he carefla getting cut cf their car, the extra six inches would rot rook-e a difference. Mayor Stout opened the meet my fer puY lie hear.ng. Addressing Che City council were: Kent Crowley, of the Chamber o£ Commerce, stated they endorse the findings of all those wto were invcived in this paoje ct. Jae Oleso n, Lewis Hones, stated they participated •.oith the Chamber and the Planning Com~•n iss ion anc! co^mended st a£f and the Planning Commission For rite information that had beer. put toysther. He also talked about Table IIi on page 121 eE the agenda packet and told e.os+ they came vp with Che 4.5 x 1E feet spaces. ,john Forte e, Hughes Investments, stated they ais~ worked on this peaject. He commented on ho.w they came up >:ith the E.5 x 19 feet saggest ed parking space. He fe Lt the maj or i.Cy of cars are st ii: ccmpact. There be tng no further desponee, one public hear ir,q was closed. City Council Minutes October 16, 1991 Page i4 Debra J. Adams, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance f7o. 452. ORDINANCE. NO. 462 (first read irg) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COVtJCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOP,v,ENT CODE AMENDMENT 9]-O1, AMENDING TITL F. P, CHAPTER 17.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ELIMINATING CO!dPACT PARKING SPACES AND REDUCING THE GTA`7DARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO 8.5 FEET DY 1B FEET, AND MAKITJG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by A~.:gaet Co ~da ive full reading of Ordinance No. 462, and set second reatlinq fox' :JOVember 6, 1991 by mcdifying the parking space to 9 feet x 18 feet. Motion ca rrietl 4'1 (Alexander no). Councilmember Buquet suggested there be some sort of incentive program to get the shopping centers to upgrade their Farking lots to the 9 feet x 18 feet. F7. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE'S SMb N'1' ANU 1NUU51x1AL sre Cir'xG rexrv AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking spaces. Staff report presented by Bruce Buckingham. See public hearinS discussion under Ir em F6. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of OCdinanre No. 463. ORDINANCE N0. 463 ifiist :eadin g) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINAT iflC COMPACT PARK ItJG SPACES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SL'P PO P,T THEREOF MOTION: Moved by SCOUt, seror.ded by Bu quec to w~a i.ve full reading of Ordinance No. 463, and set sec ontl reading for Nrvemher 6, 1991 by modifying the parking space to 9 feet x 1B feet. Motion carried 4-1 (Alexander no). G__PVeLSC HEARINGS G1. WNSIDERATiON OF ADJUS TKFNT TO PARKING CITA TIN 6AIL SCHEDULE Staff report presented by Duane Baker, As5xsta r.t to tbs City t4anayee. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for publu 'nearing. There bei.ny no response, the public hearing mss closed. City Council Minutes October 16, 1993 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 91-313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PARKING ENFORCEMENT FAIL SCHEDULE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91- 313. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No Items Eubmitted. No Items Submitted. N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS J. IDENTI PICATION OP ITEMS POR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the nett meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, Sec cnd ed by ALexander to adjourn the meeting to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation with KBR Electric. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CNC City Cterk Approved: ~E per pa p ° ~ ' ° p ' P p O nan p :a :, n :eim+~r . ,"i . .eN P o. o o :mie i in w SIN N~OOPN nOm~lw Q^OYnn QNn fNObm eaf a m m P F e n N m w« P« «w n w Nn a m r 2• ~• h ~ ^ 1 _ • •ZY • NnaNahoPr «nanahmPer«nanahpPOrNPanahnPewnnaN al.o °~hnnP OO $°a°e°m °a pprr «eNna«NN m aaaaeooaaeaaaaaa a aaao.oa a.niaaaao ° p ' en ° ° p ' ' ° a° ° ° ° ° ne' ° p vp o<° ° ° ° ° ° c° ° ° ° pnoa aaaaoaa a a a . o o o o c a o ea a e a e a a o a s v a o o c a ~ o«oc c ~< ~ 1 < < ~ m wO~i N N° N ~iW o i° . . p U N o i n N ~ w OwV « a Nra j O O:V«w ryj N \ N aF a O MOnG JV u w Wh p Y U OV VI v ~~w6w N w Zw J J O{w i O N r v ONWWV O <WV ZN N ON Ja 1.J : :WN Zi o fa JN W ~O iZmNZfV2n V Vw V VZd ~ Ww~\I J YV•ViG HIP OV F NpLL Ur•V M U V F F •tWwJ j n . O i SVJ o SaJ WJ inWy212JJ2J N27 J n ~ JVJ r w w J WwwNwOW JW W S ¢ N nVWOf w •n0 ~< •O •FVWJ ZZ ri • • yVw ~~SO i `_'> ° _ lyu~~ e« Oleoa siiw °n ii> °iuan e i <n suw s H'p . JJw ¢~fNwwPJ Z w\pnl 0 OW nO~ 00 J OFwNS<OOnO W6 VI- Op p JWO 2 t h n~~> NN w O Y ~ VZ Uti' m WiV :vZ¢ aw=<ih w l U\WF nVw hw ln V W VWi Z 7 O JNY p[U OZi~JZVOyVNf O~ n Osp v i p ==NyW H F W vjtnewFhv»FwFw>¢w2N J>W ell • _ _ _ >i w w „ wJU p '• wni h u r w u u O v r IW2f• O mfZ i wi u iW ~ J J„f <.Ji <vN<26JNin~ LL7Y2luS<wiw w ¢Vy W 6N vWLLOwWVI JWpvZw n2Vw w •i• n fOiLiiJ = Z6VN 6fivOWV nwm M v2 w w w JV N w R WOw IMNlNw >lW¢ W S2 wuSf\JZ p V s~ P h o a ¢ VUVV¢ i p . N \~ nZ \ i\YIWI~N>OnH YfOOeIOVU~ZwOrLL><apw VPwiwOMrO ZCV ~ V J 2 i w w2 Z e :fie 2 a .Oi _ _ V w w t 7 O v N w• aw N <JNZ:U N w •O Jw O O i Vw w i VLL 6 l ¢~ w Y wOa6 _ Z.JW MN Sw~ f¢ ~ V Z 1 • w N ON a ~ JZ J w U w Sl Z NNVnO iN• O Onu07 vLS r u< VWyNw~asa w y Z Y 'O Wa Vw w i OZl F6000V6WiJW vJ aVUVVwViiu i l w i wl Na= Ji ¢V foJVlVj6vv lV•[Z V l < W ¢U1W2 O ZJw WywWtl`' OSNF •O w> uNlp 6VJ0< n _ : Oa pnWJZ O NY O i ll Zi6 •l Wv l : Z pt 20ZVi \ S i o i iw ia > i h O J w . +~. a alo . o¢<w .J N sN~ n OV VVUVNi6¢ VOCZ¢naN p ¢ ~ WnONJww np(p OwJWIW Nw wV„v RO v a ¢ ~ V JNO ww ¢ Y¢Ulv {Z )VWSw> ¢wfYwl ~ •'wW w0 NSy< OJZO¢ Wwr wnf VJ N u N <OV 'Z uLLNV NIL JO¢ ¢OJpJ wwJ wf lfl~ Sff<l~a ffl• ff up0000eicmnpODUUVVVVVU 0~lnohwNronaa Naaaroio h :zi r .. a a N N N r mn' P .. r Mrw • . a Na. . nwaa«aN« r r. .om ani . a I i V iNP f!O ~•~• 00 ~~w 00 ON4 JY n ~ V d O ie ~h •V •i • •M •N • 1W ii • i •W NmeeewleeOw wryPOMeIO NanOPPwnOOan waeeaoohPmePeemaoa ooNneor-o eaneoanae pNnenmhwageooaeaoon le~howryaen~NNwaeo NOnVInNaNmVPOnaOgNOwanhPNPNNOVNaNNOan nrvNmwwwgNNa~OMn wryNwwwNwlnONOn.•m nhmNra N rv w Nan N n n L n f J••NNINaN000••Nnlnah000••Nn10+h+POwNnaNehOPOwNnaN+NOIO.• Wa « a:aa3ae<S::+eeeeYS i°+3YSSFoa ooe+aaai<a+e3aa°e°oS°++,Pe°a eYaappOeeeCpOaepppppOOpepCppe0e00pOeppeYep000a oo°a.°e'n++avo+++ar++a++oaa++aa+oaeaaf+aeaoaeaa++ea+aaae + i IL+ • Y +N • +• L. SIIm O N+ W h „ J N > V aMw N 'JNN O \ N J ••N J •OON PO JO OiN Z• f e f0 •!f O • Nw J Y+ OJN L J n\ J• L .J\J iN Y >OL •_NiV iVL I' V n0 y• 2 VOV ~P h P P N WN J YV WN J •w JI NO JOJ ^V_ ~ JNN i J •V• WO•= Wf J JO \w JwJ •'• Y W ZY i<Fhf OJ • •s iN •w} ~ i 000 \ +WW WVW IV OYW OV L L• O\> R h: J N Pam„ VsNnl F > >' M Nam ~ i MO YF 2 NYF1 V• W 1 W0 N WLW O J!1 IJJ J\O.2 W pJ OF > i 7 1 ~I> ••1'J J W O YNJY F JL N OWiL p•N OSP NOLO +HY O• NV\ L` It • \YWUV NONWY t O F WY• NNN •JO • ONN LO N~ j \ NCN fN0 JWf >~ OJ Sf JO SOVO~OWJ~~\J Y •O~J\U\~s02 jZN OYYOLWL VFMOfP •L f_+••ll U>M i_LN LV LIN WV NO O O fJ i• VL • O !V • OJS•[WS NLY> 200 OYWi0i0 00\OF1>N>__F SN Y > : aVhNiith~p•~FI<N•ZnN ViFi> •VJ 29V L ~Y > WW„ LLLiY•Y =W •J O F_F_ •F_OOFYfY OJNMNJ~WywN~~11yV N yWy W 2NIJ Wyi• J F Jf NY ! Of WfViYt~OiYW OOWOVWi2CWOt~ViLYnh}h0 SuWwNOW00 Y V• i~h J:2=••iii J~ > 2 2 VN+ pi O~hhhhnW iFOF 2\eJf 90fiw O•> iN O>WViiVW Y yOiWi WNNOOfiWN if< 00=•[WYSf2 YFfi~NNWJJ~VMOaj VJ f'J OJW~O~JiMJ ZOWiN 14L6W1 NVWNFM WV J FVVOFNLai)Y ONV„NSLY Un•f WiW JFLW =i0YOa00wW N JJJSfNi)i=NF20 1 FWFN SF FNf W2WOlOinW 6i>W~A~iLY\f\ 9Wf>W1N~WWS~Wi~%1fiJ~Wf2iiWUW~jO~~~OY OOLPaO10N 1Yw 0iY0>Ofi » MSpYONMONYf>21YWN)OiYL2iJ2Wl J i W t w J J N i i O WV OM ~ O O NV O• N JN UN N •Z LO 'J VV JOOW M W OM •ujN N 8 60N V iNVi6 ~ ~ i pV~Wl ai~ <~M N F OYYF VOOZYN V 2WWOf Oi0 LJN iii fOf i wiJ f__ WJnWFUN• NN WOi>i: <MN OJ• JWW< M WVN VV NfL NNii WiiJ • i iY O~J i i<NFi Nn FiOW W~pOOfi WVinW •L y{p YOB SWNN M~ nnrnuYi >Vn i _MYJnniJSMrW~N •iii_i iOrhi Wfw~i•fiWin < VN•iVt 7iiV w hLNhfYZiuNNL 7ZN• Wi•W MJLiWYiN YFJW_ _ _N OO • 1<O •i fe N if Oho <LWiZiWW N<Wi Y N Oi~ ZV NV)iVfi• f: •LhJO>2>O•JJi20 ii O O L•{ fJ 10 Mf i0i0y Y h0 •ffJ •OWihi0000Lt 90>Fi•[ONOV off ifNiYf6W• WW huWOWWWOt i WiNfiiiiyN i60i< ilY YFi MVNN hWYYOJ2F• SOtiONWh>' •I 9Jifff tNV t06'JUV<Yh<UVO N>JLi2li itiLh WWLfVi>JNhYVW OOVJJJJW> VYUV00000C000 wwWWLI<ILr~LLL J101VUiiiytlSSZ•••V•4i•M Yrlii FiiN V•iu i'fl gOnNPwTMmOPa nOO n••MMIIOOawINNOPIPw.IwHmNOwPaON OI`Nryq O NONTT ^NmOI NONNwaNNIINOalnpryyJaenOwOONNaI»nOO•• n m0 •IN Ne~hry nr•w wgwMnM ••q NOOnNwlwhOwn iPPn00 OaaN a wN mn Nnn1 w NNNIe• N mwa M N m .~ v i P ~iP J~1 _<~ i ZILp <00 YNw oNi V LL is«eo.aoee.nnowwu°. °e ao er ee welNn as°o°nee:«PFpo .N.rye°p +ap~°e ion ee .a.ee°aa°ae w wM.nwFeP«im.«n«nnn'ns«iww~°n+ie«aoi«°P ra-°ix °'~a °e w.°. °e e.mimwwoew P NnN .. +n NN + aNN n visNF n .. No P N a N ~ e n N s N NaFf PeNNmaN ePeNNN+NantlPeNNm+NaFtlPeNNn+N+FrwpNn PP0000pOUOOp..w~~..NwNNwNNMNNNNNNrymPmmmmAFlm^ "' w9d<Oaaa O.•FFF.. FM1MFFPhFFFFFFFFFFFFFFNFFMFM1FFFFFFF >o±a~°ipa<eOre°a~~oai++°ara+ee°aaeaiaipfea+eeao++e°f eea v°<~e+°e<ea opa '<°oo°o e+ w Of Y MO NM MNNNN Y WF Y JY W~ V • N n f awN fWN N fN OtrN<r f <f f y !VO ZPO J JJ JJNJJ iJ W`i: W lNNa ^ry JlN~ y J VV NYNVY YY WOV J O C T mil J~Ntl f J NNfJJNJJ 1iiVJ N.Oi vi1NJ W 00 :JV:J W tJ Y fJJIJJ JIfJ YV w1 ONO .V V V 'J r i f i ffJrf Of W J? NN<WV l1l •Ni V Nii •W .Y>YY> NVIL NNOVIJ 'vN!!V ..N N.iJ W1NiY YpOWW .y. ily.IWYJWW OiY J WYii NJ<O a OfWV: J<JWOW '1WJ09 iJYJ'J9Jp'J 00 'JNVNJ NJVY< T otl lozWwoooo N = apeoouu FWO of f ~ ~N~un e V <. a i saNaa aWtlW. N=~^ N N<NV> PVNWNNN NNNf ~ VY; FIXV6 fiVMW ry < ~VOi\iJ> N\\\i'JNfMwY.\iw Jtl 6JNV JOl.•YiNiN..N N'JO =F < Ow V OOWtV F O Y V>VOY \O O i W • WJVJNWY!'J pF N iV 1 VWI\iNl7VNSFFOYWliMFVVFNO JO NNiiNfl000 OIL J =YOMINNMVWii.. ONOi!!!i U F1LN!_ W WNJf VILLA 7 yJVOhJ 'J lSViVWiYiYiiMtOW>tlf>V NJ\O Y6I6R60p'LL Nom: < i~oiJ'J °o vWNVWZNW<OONJW tl0 oooe ~'~.i ilui F.NU poe VN:iyF iMyF IfV FFOiIN=MyVF yV yF yN«N : N WONFV Vli~.ii l W W'J J< 'JyWWW•~~YffUr~OJ9DWUOJY ~O~ OVJ~JNN'M<VN O iNiVNiVULLYYMF>WiYY OiN\06tlVVFVY„VlNYW..YOf 6V0 JW~i W WVJLLJNVVY>NiNWNNNNYiWiWNNNNNNNO2F>YNNOLi)FONiOiNN>N e V~fMr.NMOO~.inJiOVi~MiiONOMNwNMf~VfZtYn~wVw~wpGYarfr<N N vu 0 o tl°tl u : : o W Y <w J N O YO N if W Z N f OZ M• VOO 'J i J •i • .OM ZZ fJ0 N i OW .'! J < JN I rV> NO VfUN J VN N D ftlf0 •ILVN Y WVf pZ i NO FS NtrV .90lV YZ N NO Wf iJLLiM1FFW NZ O JW G NV VJNJVN NJ ftl V tr .WN i e NJONmte> N hOWy fV ZWN y y> W i U yi M 00 O JiYlf ~NJVVU VEO.Wt Vii OJWiN;i i i YW .FN ZO Ntl LWNiip .f iiNi •NY O6 iJ O 6 .pi VytlO rWW iiJW .W f.U> OUZO WO NiiONtl JJh ~ h i SiY V>riFiY INN •J{iMjVJtlf VO.iOiwi 7 I~ZNN rNif N< SrtlNWi iNJ Ofl i~JO JiOZ F t iW t> JN UW ..OJOiZfZ JJ.• \f iN. tlJNWiON WOfZi NORGVLJZ.>YOF'NJJ~O~JZIMVVfV:JWNN<Ni~fNViV fWhOfUWO Y iWr10VN2f NiPMFNVVNNieOtl J>OOLFVWjZIVf WWOYis J M iYipop •+<fN0> r<r<ffuyWNp rro :zzf LNpvstl IVV VVVVJJJJJJJIiiLiiiittiilifZlii00ppO0iiLLGLiIC• i O• FPNNI+NO+OpNNNNOa OaaPNNNNNOFNOmNOFNFPOaNFP NP+N NFJNFN OaNFaaON..N+OFONm..NN..NF+P NNTO+NNOVFwN.. ..O N O OFNrNrNNm m~mmOP~~Nm NFNOnOPNf~NFiNN ON N~mN~~ N Z~ rym + N •1• Ta +NNmNANN mNTmN W: 3 f V_ v ZNP ~~ti i1° =;n fOO f N hw ONp JL ee'ar °n oar°ee°.N-e°e°e °a ao~°n«nF:da Ia-io°c°~ni nr°m °oi~n cP ers.Ni °°°~o ooNaneervanlno o+v~M O+~~n ee~w~e +.e< v~wsl.e enweriero.•.o.•.ari.;e •r<rN10NryNNayn e.IrNNma MON••./ mNNNyNO «N«NN NNea Jm « NN Nm wN a NeNr rNe a•no a NNa+ n w e a .. N N •i iii Nare ° «mwNareaeNNmaNarfwrrvaheweNNmwNarePeNNmaNah Jn rrrrrrrrr aAnAAwM1NFfAnNNAwarSan r•a•~~PrnrrtiwA~A~°Oen~ePPPaPwwP o°a.°YOOeeeeeeopeaeeeooeeoooepeeaeeeaooeeeeoeoeeoeoee°tl oaoaaaaaeaaooaaaaaaaeaeoaoaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaoaaaaaa h fef N elele • e y V_ V N N N LrN PW Z J aP N N r < e la !2 i W W fJ ~J! V UNO a U O i ! V 0 O 1 ZL PmN N N i WW a FJ N N V iJ JN W O JNO o••N SrN VwNN> m WW•NIY JNf J•[V• NI\JN fS:NNPN V:W W Jar 7teNN OiLJ f P I W Z\ UPON a NOLIN iV LaV \•[h<PLA WWO UJLL G ~ 'J ^ •ryN1~ i eV ai> > eNUem6 WLWJVYV JiN Ot WWfJ PI YLW f9\N ^Oa :O fJ~ODJNe<p\6aN~ r7NJ OJ \NhfNNJh<WhPLL VZ 00 LNYry VN~I FO NO IP JOONJ6 1 U N .. r Lpfa ~N a~N JLf r W e \Ww iN~Weof~W oNn W hONypiF N W VNV N NFJV~ `V NNtlpf9N 1 iNN V ~fW W\i < ~W\WJhO\ON NOSW fhOOF< UI WJ41 J7JZNf O 1 fOVNLJNfPeJ NNOZ WOi L ZZ h_OOiJ Jf OOfN W PONFF OJ 1 • °^„N JL JMOWNWW hLfesYW NSVNWfZU aN\ NNONiZLtZONJ N JS NJi f YVViWL •PW JL^\OJ• ° N P OL42NOOSN _W _V VJOrN~VN\pU R ~• J • m NPNSONr NUfJV wl 6Y OINLfrSZfLN •[ NfN \WZ ZNYW N WS i L hfPhOrr OOZrOi O•[ •NripOWMOYhN~ SNIN O> wiWNWfUL)Y fli yh N=Olh• Yp i yyh i h•NtNJUO tfNVZ<6POrNlfJWf W4!_NJL •Zii,L N OVJV>fWJNLVf~NI')°hJi i iNNLOrh Y fpYO iJfiYLZ fYfiLYf Nf<ZRM O=WL ZS!> ZONfLiNLhiOZN WhWr YNI m mm iWNfihOhJ OViV Nf W`Mf NWNmLOUZNNWiWUVNNNN:IMV OMWMMLNL lNNN Vy~ \sWNNff OfiiWYi\ Z i WS7 •a)3SO)LSWiWOOMMJ• OVNNwpfaN6iNVMfZ<VfNNNNmZNN r NONJJiONNO Nf NV«iNV~OV of 1 t YYfNrV M JJJhu•Zi Jiu. ~yie s ~ iiiiW° NJ W4 N OOYLNO i • S rflM S OOOW~P r ZS tlWNJLM FFhVO f°i r°.~L i.°sr Leo °e 1•ioi •l• o WVS J<f< YJ i°< otW °vWZ PooeiYi YO f• NfYWWOY NWLlyyVVyV ON9WYNN •Vh) i0e•[Wli iYiYiV• TWW• •LtV<N Y ZW6faWN°r OWONiWYVNhYO• WWN iWVLWJ NyJIf.IMONwWW•Zj: WOOOPiOj~=ZN=Ff filJfONh)OLLVVJ ll7iiVYNf ffiY6tYieYNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNN z z N hti L uY/ff N W Wt y O I h!i JO V iV WNV• i ioi°eo °h ei `~~°n °u •Y•a y•Yiy D OVWy^ SJ V N: JOiii ~::i: ~S:.o WW:~.@W W WV Vu OOiNF 'J JZWONW_O if Pio P 7J hLLWaV030 iWJ•[OO •WiJOOZJ ii Nt i722y J JJf rYY •Wf •O •WLiii U VVV::i=JfWY•VinNJNNNNNN OOOI.r 9'JfWiiZRiLfWWWWW N NNNNNNNrFhhYNJ9iiZlii Noaaea «•siei~naei~nmoannw wrr. N~erenmw.Y.ri~n:•.°•.nmw~.P.o nwP NNNN n NwJPn«awmrry N N NmN I NN Nn N m N rnNNNnNMN mNN N 0 fNP ~~.~ UOI Oi~ 00 iF¢ obi i u ui :i i 01 2• •O• •2• :i ia• i w i •i• •OII f• ie~ iVi •O~ is: ~W• F• •w ~W~ •i• ~~• •Z• ti O~ ~S~ :T n'oiiwe n° ~Pwe N ~ w w P N J~POwN Ph~~~ v'oao°ao s V N w ) P iioi Nv«^P ~aw~i •., i9 NiJM• JNOJM iJP~J OWOOJ W WO MiNOY ~°mi M1~ i0euii• WM1ryiW iiTlY iwuWi Ji\)W twYOM i W O V O V W• WiasY MOi,Y •/W~ Ji U~ Nh00 N~.sao ZNWiW liR)N NMPM .E O V :NP u2M =Oo p;w iWO O w16 „ T ar_>NaaaOaaCgnTCagPm 0 MaCN~00mO0aNNONNOONNFao+m O ayOdar~TOgOTnyonNr000Na n O N Na^^^PrNrOrr {• a a n nT Nn ~• ^ n ^ •• rr N • nN m r m N s ~ JmhmNmaNOPgPrNmrNaY•PO^NTrNaYmPOrNNaNaN•PO +NahgPO a: rn~O~s~~Y~O~fO~~i~VO~~a~~~~~lYgl~~~~~~~SSe TifeV~VV~ •!• P000000000000000000000000Y000000000000000000pO000oo oNaaaraeraraaaraarar<rrroraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa .ii • I r . 1 I I• • m i u °enys mla+ • vi•N ~ N< O q„ P PP NN • \\ O ~ • • aJa a .°.a~a• tiNi ye ^= W ~N: R • ~ ~~o va wm ` o~~Wy s ~~ ~ J q O F \TWm s WNP• WO F V`~ V VNyi YrW rw O • N •ww .• NV J Y J P{i : APP WNSp iPV •:V<V j:0 WW \q WS JggNfW• s• N W VIJ f ~n ~N •L pYNwO Y rYYS••Vi Yw J SV WS JIN W Y N YIJS Y VJ J~ JV• 2W\ i o ` u! •" i c ii.WNN psi W! w!!N N ouo 1 • Ui ~ Z{WilyJY W= NNWNT WOOF t~ Y;w ••2w iVJS • f NeNOOJn See •i9N •eoeNiSY ~i• r < YJC< O N qV ~• m`•n MIalMmJ SOFI WFWw •Mi \ • Z Y<6YSFN2NlYY _ •w ^ Y : rW n Yw fY V i •\W6 W7wYwN N N•J9. 9•~NWi J• WJJia ~ ~ NO W7JYW1! 2 O N O S O J FV60N0 ;G• f 10NVSV JMJWt JNa W N N 7 ` SU V < •• ! ! N YNWINNwYYNiV:\~N•S N: W ^ = \ iYVitgyi 1 JW (<JiW MfW f•JOifyl jy F tl N • O••f iO~W3! VO•WOJV •<J•YJJONWJ••MJrJ W!N :N• OW OY > SF 20= YZiN Y„=1Y:NyDFNiVV•N~YyO `VN UfyYOWo •O• a SW Oi YJVIYfU< YNW SN•WYiMIi(NS•IWOS ~i~ W N LL ~w L YWyf wY20TWWJ>!p•OwlUJOYa00Y l7WrJY••ZWYm •W• yp V• : 7YWY2 iYJ 'J<OUOYfWq<ILO MYi <W WY.6 Wi000uJ ••Yi~ N •ii ON iH V WlWti•2'•SfOif t~VylO~tlYO•Sl~~lRG~OlNStlZiJfNV ~ U_ • r y ~ J i N V •• •• O • i N Y • N < O • <V i u aw i u N i i i e> : w N ~. !s w >a z J J J fW Y L {' r fN LN V_ < • J w fh iN MJ N J O • ( Y• i 9t S~ J N VO V • ? W !2 iY Y6 O J• O w• ~ y iY •99 W••Y <( •O.1 ~i • • i i V S Yi Oq •YlN~<•w > SW Lw NY Z • : O O SV VaW(F fiJ i YYOM! YY>•i WO • Y F O YD I•MWVq<J WS< SYJ• LfY m ~ H ` W J W i i0Y=0LFIW JOM i }O•• ••tmPN> ~ i O M Y F NV4W• YiY!lL~iitlOJ<WWIONJYJnVJ • O N L Y V OVi •••VYYO Y'YiViW qY>F•t; Wq Yw >ffVYNO • i !N JW nWY YfWp•7 if O\• YFY NUY<NnW • < _• tl W=211i •O~O•YqN iM1HVt!• WW • W • • Y W ! w O O• f t•f Wy •WM •O~pO(•JwON SiyWWr YO YW • OYi2fJgV! •IyN yIIgM •q( NV Yy OOi OSf1L ~W• O y )Y F1 W `lWpVa2lZOpRO•Y[W W(~tY Sl~~YJrY O_M V_w_w2VYNi60 •i• i O! iw ( aVJVM(tWVLNtJINOgYNN<NJJnw( 2 arw JSIO f• V .7• uY O OOJJJi(iNNft« VWWWMJOl9t<fgyWWwZ L.•000L] •i• N N NS N V fffffffftfttlgggqOqOOO{OYYVVUVUVUJUUVVv • •Y• • mP Pf O wPNrINgrNnlq aTalYNrI.OT a•~Y<ONPlPOm y •00: T N• rY OTPTnggaya••T TN ••w+NrP„fTlwN••a P.Y .•n^N •i• T n aN ~• N N aYl•ITaN^NImN aTNT Tm m N W• ^ N Naha ••OT OaNTaa O Nan •>• V r O :N P11 =~T WV Y W 6 EcE w• \• •~• h• Z• •i• iii i i i ~„~ w± •UI •O• na°apNpN.epp_ppfpppeNNNeNpppneepNeeeNpempppp.pee pane ooN NOPPJmpOPOpOONOnmpNJnnONy N O< NJmnn J ONN ~i-~ m < ^ ,•I+Na1-m P'NNnM1NOh00=NNneNOnOPOy •NahOPey Nv+i uhiN Mmm s'aomOmmZOO~Om~OCa~e~~~~OmO~~~~iavoym0~~a OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOpa~ap0000000000000ppOp0p0~ e)oaaeaaaaoeaeeaeaeaeaaeeaeee aoaef eeoaaoaaaaeaoaaa e> o u{ ;<~ m i w \e \ o nw ~ °~ °a °.nh r NN : I.J ~ nab Ni~.°I o.\. u Ow j <w Jn JOO\ NaOW Uw LL_00 N N\ N i>{P~PnwN\•O•~ OnN y YYnW W 6• W¢ N P VPO Oa = y{1{NO\wN~ i6¢w WW V Z •fi e \O LL J i Oho LL UWJW >~'{ h SOO N ,N •Ni NrN 1 Yifr~mPON¢IJ i~l~ fV W _N ) N n e ~\> OIW M10161 WRZOV •[VON 00 Y~<O NZ 000 a h J i F N•{=L) W J J{ Z NWNwf M••6 s N NOZ 1 •W Z VOW V <ioSO Jh N O O~yNO;Fe ••N •NOs JOJj ~WrWWrO Yh WZLW: w Jp ¢Vi NiJO hZNVY LLfN• OINIWV NN NJNNNr•Wf60wWV Na•WW~fN Woehai ¢zsWNZW up o s Wrwuh pN Ni0 O V ims ONVNY WN yO ON)Y N Jm O hn)fW~IJWtl JYMNNJ hWMWYiOh 1 I11L1 S tl LLZN02 ZNV i0 <W <WW WNLLNVNNS`1Z i+;NIVZO Jh~N<ON OJWVNhLLiFWN~tliY10N ZN<w WrYWL ¢20mw JWJ09 OijtN fNWN fJNW Jjo<'V{iWyNJmV W VN OOOW„ N=N GY WIL I•IIJO JJVW p0:•J i J J~O~ mW)V IL JiW i n~V~~O<SVLLJ YM~hON ¢VO N VVO~Y=_O=NaO_uOi V_>VUVJ>Wii•1[OV0=si000WOJ~wiVtlhrW¢pf OV ri {Il0 M W>OWV PYiNi O Yi N n N 02„~i VW WZ» OVZ3f N¢ ON W 'JhW Ii7'J OWOw_iO h_hhZlm N JWNNW>Y.iNILOif OIWOiLLOW 1>LLe LLWWhLL ,YJ <NNO JNWZZWWWf WOW6JLL:N'iVW9VWJOieNWWW<W O ZrpN(J a0i0 Y. i1LOFr0620Y9NV ONVJNtlpiYJ•IOm0V0f6UY6NtN WV f < J N M O O • • • •~ » i fN V V i O N Y •t V WO Z h~ ~WJ•iiV N • ~~ f0 Z •. f•> • MN i ON 1 N lwY~= if : J~tlVN2 O N f )Z O• i W h0 NWO )zNiOVWi •N YMiwa~ aJ r0: •00 Y Z W iNWp= ^ = 6fffii>f ONW V OiiOW V{ TZ JauO {sioi N <WSWSU~WJ fWS>r{rWiofN e: ••'" h VVfF 7ihhWiYJNiZ O N? ZVViWN hOUfOOWiO••W Znml w NN„ OOYiNNMNON _• _O • y i= 7 :•001 i6 i N VMJrWWI •i\ O VWwO !Ni j • OOM •WW• • •>iJ •OYi VOO ••JLLff] y O WOihW• • ••O JfWNMWOiOW 1f hJ fNi W •N ii •NwJ i00i100Nf iW iNW\OO N• JWNNN• <hVWN OlNO{fWwJ •ZIm f VNf r1.O JihNJf000ifOhJ VJZNf iWONWieiZNiNYn N VfJJZ>VV•f)iNJhIVV¢fOOfZfWi~JZwWNJiiYNitltlNJ])>uVu u weeeeaoooa eo owuuiw Wei Wwl{i li ul'~1°.I`.:~uuuO °uusiiisiieiiiiii.. .. .. N NONOPNINONOwNPe1M1:100WfwfN+NOMOeN y1•NOO rryyNNM1^NONNNNNNNONTNry hNwOfhWIaT+TMONOwNPNmry npN eNnnnN~NN~~OnNONwOw~nPNNyy •NNNy~mP N NONnN Oe0 a NNNNfyN• •wJ •IfNf nJT rv NN O = V :NP UST ¢o Si .OO e:lu J i i i i i ~i \• i[ 7• ¢~ i1 i i ti •Z •¢ \O •O •i n ovveP<eNVeemroPraooee NoeO ern M olnwNe.ioNear ..o N.~.~i.~el~rMrNeionireur.: amINV nn Nn OaN rv u.. m..N nw u P NmNwa• m ry N N o n JVNVm VV•OO mVNO NwlNtlh•PO•w•N•N ON2OT•+ nN wPPPPPP~SwppwppmPPmP~ OpPPPwPw~l~X~~P~pPPPP >000000000000000000000000o00oO0ee000000o000pO0000o00 Oaa00fO0atlVOa000aaa000a00a<aa00tltlaa•tltlO tl'[O OOa000a000 V • •• •• • • • Y On • y Nf\ \ P• NPw N\ NO 2 NO< tn0 \Z \ •O p N\ PPmP O<.I O• w\ WO mp\ry..\ Paw min w \J NNf` _~• W N • wtl6: •M V 00. TJCf • \ N'1 GS• 20= „¢¢..wynVO¢O WUaAWn NiOI\ 1 .VIwINI1SOlN ZO Jllw w~llm VNI WJ OWN J NWl6 YEN ..NOS. ~O<S MT a fT.OrWU~iwi .V>SOWYOw 2UO.W.f NOO NIJ •\ NF~NV • ~N Ou JI.K ?On11~~O Nle1 •100 ^¢Tx ryiJ ~ 6 ~ ~•.TWVf 6•w ONN r .I 002.. ••IWWY 1¢K<WTnw w2[O\ LL••OGQOO.1•S VV OOLL O~.NWr¢WJrWOf rZ~iWN•WNWpWZJN oNrWV nronPnnTWSS~rNWwrWrWeuiWUro•N .i.i ae°1u .\iirNNr•rf NNW xy rl-N.°.ow:,~ssu.i.w~ioisJ Jr~r.•1eu°O":~ e rOV SftJJJW J06<rfOyhJ O 22 ni00wOOfYO JJ><20JI1 NJ V Z ZI~WJJOO TJJw ZOW..¢IW6N1•iNiSNrGfNiW W 10<O [UYOOiONVYw<¢R ¢OOiOWONO 2 < Z JV^^ JMtlWONfOOYy<VTOOJ¢ VZOV<wSUOVWVWWJWWiONTt<OVQZf VOO JrGW•SZNN•NwSS•06JFF N• w ioS •Z^TZi?r:'Jir`rOOnr.N VirSr7eTrrTJ00Vrw• W>61[T i f0 S YO ZJhVrI SOi..wLW•WffWfrLLLLNUNQfjN.WWpO~OwirW S..W'J •OM JfVJ1LwNLL >Z>iOVOW¢LCOGOiYW>JVLJ6COlNU¢npYp~j{~wlMfNOOptSNw~~ i OM ! i O e i J ~ ¢ wz ~ r J~ 7 ~ w O W =.. ¢ u ro aW a os J 1 u .w N s • N s ¢ r J y W y W ~ r ~ iN .i JYF1N V '0 'l OrVNJ2 V VW[ H ~S yM f i JJ N i S J WY • r i 1ui fV rr Sw.W i•_ O S _ L/S_•_w_F. NfYfVi rY 1 wLNhOJOYV • J V Vfrwr N NI.riW wi i0i NOONf •J F iiWO. ¢OO .Y i:Nr . ZNr > 00 • VNF iO JJ I- .Y¢wV'si iw1• ZNWWY n w• VJJi~WiJi~ fWJWV r rw~<Ji Mrn.W1\iON•ntapr[ •::1:0 V1fW V •LJi¢ JwmO¢ iW .WJ rlrfrYtOiriJOwrwnir SN Vi iyOWiS.JO • .WnJr. 00 W :. Nf i. _ >_• •aN:wVNFi Mr•N N .iYJy JJ F V Jri ii tr •r 6 6NWNn2Vor10 OifOMi M0 W erreoo-iooo < .u N ¢eosf Ji: zNi ••riisWr .. z1~`.°.~ NNS : NN Lt y it w. wrNMF..ioFir..e.rroouzoeii _ VO=JJJr ~OO.r.VjiMVYUf:Vn`¢F VW-.i¢rNJVM>ZiJVnrO 1 wz zzs .oevwrJ2e<rrrWe .• <rYU w..eee o_oa+_. w_W_W_._.:¢s .. U.r w.N lY77.t .[x Y.[JJJJJJi i [tiii i i i 0000Gn 00„.NN^TOryNnP.NONMr..NNn NPNmNnmh OTN:=I11.1P rO:P• N• w OrN MI.PnrhPNnmOO..oON^h M. NON I.Par• 0mev rynwMTmNO r1.IN N1.1 ^1wNNyN^Pw nmm gOIn ONwIN ONINOmrvNN N m •..mT.Nn•• N'. N NhryNlhmN O• OryN n.. m g NI UiN 0 =in fOo ~i ¢¢ ~O ~O IZ ~F •r Oro O N Nn ^.N.N m N NN NN rm n .. T«N a.d2mT m r oor°Nw TP„or.PerNmJNar¢lerNTdNar•wa wN Twndr•lewNTrNarWwewNm Papaw::wawa;aaaaxaaa::saaaaaa:ae:~aa:::saaa::r:veee °°ea°eee°a.°e.esea<eaeo°a~°oeace¢pc¢eacOaepeW¢p¢aeeeaececaood..n_.. wawa<avaadaaaaaaad aaaraaaaaoaaaaeaaaa y . ... . . . •.. y¢ J W WP••• w ~rt JWO iW O! ~N NY NT H iw .•O O \N_ Nd O•Ji F J• V VI l Nn p w ll YN r .N ~ ! aifi oO~a iZ _ mZ Wj pl a •ZnVNN Nr iw Tf !O P ~•ftV iNP ri Z'u YY Z. aP 1JiM• PN \f •h ¢'JJ¢ jWQ1. 02 ~WnF JO N NM N7:F JOJ W VWF 020h w<h M•Vi h< V~V 1010 •:VY VJ wYFSa¢F VWV,N YI~Raa a7 J~<J ti2Pi J VYJ .Y M 00 Nrj¢ i2¢tifF h• NOO Y N • W rn O •_•i 00 rN rJH2wwVa20 N¢ <» < NF•r NtNj~ Z LLVtry :• .In w~NWNro C iaN NVMN O•NWe OW NOYTWOJ 00¢w¢r Nuii ••V1OFNry~VMZZVY .W>OI ZFVOWwINW II FJN1vnWY<,6 ~•V2•YMNOLL WO¢ZyN~~ YWOrLL •.ZLr¢... Nr PMiI••¢ WJ p n1••OiYO w W OOU60 iiYJ TNwLL •=~fOJ OYOUrnHVVZiJNI.hO.rIW>NO ~f Y_1 Jh i_nW ZO •PNO N2 w ilN OJ90W_OOW4¢W _.• !~F OF_OW ~ <_VOM'J6 J IImNu ~w¢NWVNw Op• WW O ~ WLLOL TON •>iNW WW JZ WZZw >_W fFMwt Wh WWQ.. : nw JW¢ ~ >WV>VVWO»O :iV•P>W.y Jo z ••w iNhJi W~Wai<VtfO 2 <IP.V 9WVFV Z f 10 •I O~Vu yJZYON< NO • L<rlfN¢.IIN lY `•~`<Nf0 NNWNZ OrV_iON OJ• :FNrIN<ZJ •WJii i00^a=N¢i> WNrOYNZNiNN mmm 1.9pw ONNW..\I\r0 WiWGWJ.Nh M.i N J y Y O • V_ V J LL Y O _ O I < O •00 Z iVi N F F¢ ¢ G •Vi rm •OZ V NZl V <O O N U~ yw iWf J >O> L S Zw ~ W i Lf Qi ~1••YW wj r~ Wjaw •r. OD V OJ •O NJ w•r IL¢u ie M9•Z •tWM V_ iZ0¢J Ja WNii N OW wVYVN ~` ¢ SNWMiiO<VtWf NNUO M~< >•n<Z•••O> NWOOON WO Owh<¢ONZrNLLVn• L< a Oo VZ i0 W ii ZZ ON J )Wh i.1:ZVr„ ~ ~^ Jt~w Z«~V•• Z VOWp~«N LtWW •p0 00 M ~ OWTjnr N ~yOa¢ =ONhVVVVYiJNWi Z•W~Ly• <~~JS w VN~OT ¢M OMJ<NJ?JNn iWh •OYV•wr NZiiVp•• OJW~JZiVVVZWYi<ry i••• iiV yOi Y¢V OOOMLF •Y •N<>NVIYOON LZN N af99Z¢W• L 6 ONNNN OWZ i2W • •O OOON; •Nr •f•OWWNZZN• w• ¢YfZLOOL• W>rWJZNL ONLLZi 01NYYiMNN••OWW <J LI WWWWriOw~YTMO< pyyyyy •••N ___ujJ VJV rY ¢yhhO=~J2 ¢ `JNJJ9Jf 1'i l2~hW~F>•NJJJ2< •• 7nJ 06C\••¢O•LL•¢•60¢¢6¢¢¢¢ZiYYZ60Z¢NNNMNNNNNNNN .On iVnnn~N.n N Trwpwa00PONTryO•wNNOOwrNNTNOrPONOwTNOdrrO _ MP<OrNITON r0.•OO.OTrOO VOrerTrON00 _ N•NPO wmO p.• ryNmOmO! M„NTNTINry„NmT ! ITTNr r~ON NNrT mNNNT NwN<N NN NNwNNrNN N mr n Nn 9 v :Nm F^ UfN ¢Q :=6 ;: ~i E_: :tli .~ .• a: i i i ~yi i O~ z~ • ~ aa~ ~<m~ ^sovoaoosNOaaa odaaaaaaoeaa~oaaeaaaaaaaa<evoaaao a amp P JNW ~JPi m Y tl iFU i Nftlr f ~ J \NNtl2NVdW ~\ oJO Woin C \Nm„J wnp O ie' ~eie fi o.'.e CJ tl0~n fN _02iWiP J `V'~l mo Lie~~POWJf m~WOW[ f:=~ O{Ntl fVa tlpNio6VNVtlNIJ NI iWfpmWNfOIfV2Wf0 tlOUYwOyVNVVwOOpY VY 2 71 iV+ i pN •NV NU x LLSxJY OY NJYVN Sfin ~~u~s~~N "~i ~~" rou oi~io r>W •MWp uivNan• WZkJUViv eOWFS• NiffOJfv ~[ON>WO>WILf ~Nf W>J tlfWJpiW OfwYpJJi2 rfftlwxORYJipff NNintirFFrYMF»>)> 1. w.. imW 0 ~m YJ f _ Vw r 01 1 V uMJ? hJP ~~ ~J VJ YNO i~J >OJW 7m a~MJ ro °o xfWe• i;~ f 7LLJ~00~1 y1tlM NVWN1pVOVFw WVti OJfwRJiU PIWM ~Nf NFVi„p NOi~JN h OfNJNCpePf Np~WN N~OJJOeQWNtliN No xNW i~WOpyY1wN aaOffWeNV0~1~..W~t J •f ps o .V. ~ tlr r N V _N o WJ JV pVM F VfLL O yO~ v V~N U(iP Cr0 •i YfJkN Y{yOMVO JFIt>FVLJNNMLW 1. aarsue `s tlfMN M_WM1I SVWGWJ WWlp nl •O\V~iy W Vi~Vinti~ViO •f Iii YJS ~~"de a1W-oNaaooi YOOJNJJJJfYW fVWWWwNY00WfW >)iif)xixi>SNNN mNaPaNtlla maemwePMPPtlw NNT~nmwNmaMr~NpJNN dONryPNNdNnNpMpr NNa NmhNmYPlnmNmd dwNd wla MNPnN Nm - ------ CITS' OF RANCHO CCCAnOtiGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~ .,~ DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~ i BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer 1~ SUBJECT: AUTHOR [ZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR ~~ THE HAVEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING (P.U.C. N0. 2-96.7), TO BE FUNDED FROM SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND, ACCOUNT N0. 22-4637- 8851 RELDMENDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing (P.U.C. No. 2-96.7), and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice inviting Bids". BACK6RDUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction 1s 542,350.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for November 15 and November 22, 1991, with the Bid opening at 2:00 on Tuesday, December 17, 1991. Respectfully subml d, ,~ ~'~Z~C:' Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer MJO:LRB:Iy Attachment Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. 1 / - ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING (P.U.C. N0. 2-96.7), IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" iN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BI05 WHEREAS, Tt Ts the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Lo construct certain improvements Tn the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has preparnd plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing (P.U.C. No. 2-96.7) Improvement Project". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and spectft cations, which said advertisement shall be substa ntt ally 1n the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 17th day of December 1991, sealed bids or proposals for the "Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing (P .U .C. No. 2-96.7) Improvement Project" 1n said City. Bids wilt be opened and publicly read Immediately to the office of the City Clerk, 1500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing (P.U.C. No- 2-96.7) Improvement Project". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Cal7fornia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 1s required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem ~~ wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the fob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 911, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of Lhe California Apprenticeship Council, property indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will 6e used in the perfornwnce of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 Dercent 1n the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or 8. Nhen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that it 1s replacing at least t/30 of Its membership through apprentlceshlp training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices an all of his contracts on an annum average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds establ7shed for the administration of apprentlceshlp programs 1f he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable lrade on such contracts and 7f other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. the Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. ~3 Information reiative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of Cal7fornia as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees 1q pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1173.8. The bidder nnrst submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Tnto the proposed contract 1f the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next iowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful perfornwnce of the contract for said work shad be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation Insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Na proposal wiii be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Cantractor•sha11 possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) 1n accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Sectlan 7000 et. seq.) and rules ~~ and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E35.00, said E35.00 1s nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable Dayment of E15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Pians and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's soie cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (perfonaance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of November, 1991. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of _ 1991. ATTEST: y er ADVERTISE ON November 15, 1991 November 22, 1991 ~S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 1991 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: 88TENBION OF COMCABT CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE Recommendntion Adoption of Resolution 91-012F extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BacknrounA The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to insure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. DO/ja SM:978 Attachment --- - CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 TO: City Council ~ ) FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager P~/J/"" BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk ~ ~ ~C SUBJECT: DBBTRIICTION OP CITY DOCOM8NT6 It is recommended that City i:ouncil approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). Under the authority of Government Code Section 3d090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DAJtr attachment RESOLUTION NO. 91-012F A REBOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP AANCHO CUCAHONGA, CAL IFOANIA E%TENDING COUNTY OP SAN EERNAADINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COHCAST CABLB T.V. POR 90 DAYS UPON E%PIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the Franchise License granted to Comcaet Cable T.V. by the County of San Bernardino and grandfathered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga will expire on AR ~ and . '~ FiWt) WHEREAS, negotieC ions flie ongoing 6etWeen the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Comcaet CeD18 T.V.; and WHEREAS, all terms and conditions of the Current Licenee will continue the same. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDr that the Clty Council dcee hereby extend the Franchise Licenee for 90 days after the expiration of the current County of Ban Bernard Lno Licenee. I~ /~l RESOLUTION NO. 91~i A RESOII7TION OF '1f~ CiTY CW14CII, OF 1StE CTIY OF RANCHO CUCAM]NGA, CALIFAIII7IA, AU1fIORI22NG 'RQ; DESfRIJCl'IQd OF CTM REWID6 AND DOC[PffMS 4II~IICH ARE NO ILINGER RDXNRID AS PRi7VIDID [NDF12 OGr7ER1A1FS1f CARE SECPIO}7 34090 WHFRFAS, it has beset determined that certain City recorcLs wrier the charile of the follavirg city Depar~nertts are no longer required far public ar private purposes: FINANCE DIVISION WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the abvve- mentioned materials is rteoessary to wruerve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handlitg, arc? informirxY the public; arcl WHERFAS, Section 34090 of the Govetrcoent Q'de of the State of California authorizes the head of a City deparhoertt to destroy arty City rewnis and doamwnts which are over two years old order his or her c3targe, withnut making a mPi' thereof, after the same are rw longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written oatsent of the City Attorney; and WfIDtF}1S, it is t]r_reforn desirable tv destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, wi~'rart making a rAPY thereof, which are over two years old; arcs WHEREAS, said records have been approved for destruction by the City AttDrney. NOW, 1fII~REFORE, this City Wurail of the City of Random Cucancnga does he ~ resolve as follows: SECTION 1: 'lttat approval arcl authorization is hereby given to destroy those TMjG described as Exhibit "A" attadted hereto arc] made a part hereof. SOON 2: stwt the City Clerk is authorized to allow examirwtion by atti donation to the DeparGrent of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Council, arty of the reooxrls described in Exhibit "A" attadred hereto and made a part hereof, except those deam3d to be confidential. SOON 33: 'That the city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full form and effect. l~ .° 0° C4V04^" ::0AY0N^4 "W:. .. TuC C~'~ ruCMii C~ C O'C•CC ~ . -D: ::-, -.:~-.,,, ^.. a9: 3E'°Akn'C -u: Ri00R0S '!AYAiEuc~.. . ."!V!i:Ont .r.~..: r.:CR^:~:." ~N !A° A'.. c ncci40°E: Y__>~"A!\ "Cfi ~.: i3'S uAgv cNcn oAy g cnc unynE.:ES'97° `„ 9c. ~'. o_ ?:' :: !'c.' 0097£ .^.ORn. i4A'.99: V=_',: Scss 7co ... :Eo. VA8]l -:NAV9' w,A. 74 °4ix OAc;S !g' _ya y. „x rY9~cNi5 c40v . cgnv 4AN0>. 4 ae" !-, I4ES ' Y!'4: eo, cc c .e' ..n ~n~~ . ........!'4A'..:~w'S.'.0N - - G. 6 SONS A'J'0%9':V° . A o Cni ~DMCy~ - ASS `:ft_ :ERV:"- " __ dCE P ,{• umcgi ~ 40c 0cc~0c y~ooiy . 5'C ... . -- - ., e 'F -:'~F u. ~~ c.40C. yco lC. nrv c'~~owv :'ce^ A :: dMcR10AN DLA44!YS A>SC^_. -" _" x ". AN74:°AN SC:. DU °L:L 1jv!v c', tl¢' . Auc4:,A4 m'o'-i: WOQY° AS°CC. ."Ce" c evco rOAY 5'.M:NA95 !NS'1P- . "~ _' a :: Pc c•ie cOA; :'".e^ = .. ?~SCL:A" 2 E40:N`E,45 :e• ~ [~:°159¢. 'OP`KA. SAN?A c_ :, c~ ~/ c.lMANc y. 4crngn ,~q ncr VJ`' .. c.`!e' o,.,x . -".. -.. ~S- 9~i AY;': ..v ,. :c./29/°.Z c m^ n,!0~!0, n4/J9" 2 ."o• y~o ray . ic!1°.102 ... 29/92 . .'..'7°J°.: .^'r 1."' 4°°' .5'29/°.: .. ia' _~ia ~o2 Za;o2 ., ':o• ,y2o 192 tt ...';o~ )5 X79192 "U791:1 i!::!°2 :'l:"0' :E; 29100-1 .-.... :5:1919: ]'!.:'~c' nc 129 ~C7 .. .° 4A4CYC CCCANOYGA >4G E: 2 CA?S: ".7/:3/9' r~YC. ~n.n'.I10 r. _:ON'!5'e 4.__.475 AR°_ SCuc7:'LE7 cCR Oc_5r47:':71', a'°A55 run: CArc r nc5!gR, oyn~n:CN. S; Ok' A.V. 4cri:44 m ru, o5m,4O$ YANA53YW' 7!V!SI04. Y.~"•= 4_C0~R95 VSrcg ac_pH XA~ A__ 9c pgrgmrn. % RE'A IR "05E ?ECC,40S RA RR X'T4 A9 % PoR rC9?N5. 7ESrRC° '~c 4c5• _. __ 'C: ~.. RECCR75 0004:; NA?OR: 5eew Saar YA4% 7ATS5 ig~ :Nn . o~g yr.1 c cgnY r" c_,ne. o+ =,e _cv 'RG?YERS >3!yP. ~,. °c1 Se• : :? 3A'_7N!4 8A'ur .._ 29 SAYC~4Cn_NR nycv rg, :':e^ [ °.AN% CF AMERICA .4? 6 SA Fc'ae^ : .: 9ARC0 KU4:CIPAI PROC'Cr< -.._^ ~ :: 9ASSL IHE 4ARCNARE .':e^ e .. SLACvSw_c3cR POSEA4l :':e• [ S2 9RANC: JSAVk:yc r c':e- : .: 34!0.455. ;c3o.c °c'tle• 0 S! B47NN 9~40`!!5~P5 AC,'US"45 co'[e^ : SS 44npB°.EHT :^. PP. ':':e^ A S? R:'S!NS55 L'C5N55$ Rc.F.'4C5 '982 ^''9e^ [ 59 C C SNOINEFR140 °c'!e- : CAL!cn,4N IA ASSOC. C' o_ic_,~ uugCueSc _,._ - S3 CP _!'744!4 CO'!4C!! :° ;:'/:_ SVGP: :': e- : Se :A'_;°7PR!A C5k?Al Sc_kV::° =1Ee- . 55 CA.:cC RN!A 5V5RG° CCY4: 55:7N c'[e^ : :, CA _: °7R4!A J7JR4A. 7 i~ 8 la ; ~//pi YA ~~_ 5CR •. °:4 [: '.939_' [%': :"cc ~cP!'ANc.V" 45:.°.:: ,. ..S'R:° ,5-C!`VAL °.OX ]3X 1'7. _7.A`...... ..- fE' _. Say. .. 77/.°'/5, OS /29/44 _ ". S/29/B2 mi=~~~a. "c. /29/42 ^. ?/7'/3'. :5/29/34 ^^/".'/B' :5/29/42 m?7 i,o na i2 c;o2 ..... .:;29'07 . .,:29'32 :°/^.'/P' ::/25/32 .v/,./a. nS; 29/o0 '; :'/?' ;S /29/42 V7'/3' .:; 29/32 ,~o ~. "E /29/42 ..C/r ^c/pa/3Y •,/r:/e. n3 /29/82 m /r ~,/o~ nc /29/32 ~2, /0~ nc /29/92 n?/n ~, ie~ ,:5;29/02 n m~io. :S/2i/g2 ?/:'/'• 'S /29!92 .r1 /9. .a, nS /2a rg2 ... ^.5/29/92 nv/:~/e~ 75/29/42 ^?;.'; a•, ^S/29/94 ~~/n~/o, :`.;29/32 7ll:'/3' :L29/B2 C4 /:'/3. 7S /19/32 A55' .. ° C'7R;'.° ..' ..- i 4ANC°C :"r4MCNSA __. .4'~. ,._,. •~Vc ru_ -.__^W:92 °.E:-0.'i 499 :-vc".~ c, `C4 ::?RCC :.1~ ~._„_...... _ _ _ /,.r. •4 A4: RE.C R4 •u_ "o~< v4Y45:u=y.• ,,...., ,xw<': =9:^R75 ~:<.c7 ' _..a vA'•P.__ __ n:c: q._.c.,. °'A:F "u,CS -,=.. .9 vA4° n~.u 04 % :"o rn,~ _. ,cc-mr~` ... . °.:'_ _.. _ 4iCC4C5 CC.4.^: VA `C 4: 1'ee'c 4s:• ;~,_ .. :cD. 4.4Y': =: YA4CE ue :'. S:?': vARK 455 H..J94' :.r :7R'H'c 9VV ' :e^ . ..,._. c:9Y:: vU4::: DF_ 9CS:accS -4', „__~.. - '".er . .. ..... c7 k'L'F. D444° A1'C 2c: ._.. -pipe.: .. BA'!cC~44!A °__. .= vucn ~. e4" c'4e17_ ... . _ ce^ . ~°,A49ER C` CC+494:9 A41'^°.! .:~4vC';GF _'ce- : r^/E RCN. :VC. :'pe^ a ve ou :..°,R:Sr;o4E9 .^,P NR;L9' 1"e^ : .. °. L9RYS ASSCi .. .... °C43:F ~~ prlr, q~: Dev40'c ...'ac ml _ _ ~ j4.~4?S Np N ^~ .D~DU ~cc :E . ..'A'_ SBAR: n_.:F ~.. -:'tle- : 5'A" `ARY 'YSC R4N:9 p:y- t S*P'S CCxocuSA':_. !49!'44^::= :'~e^ 4 :T, A?; CN039 CC4PC94-I_. -a':e^ C . 9L'ocq:4-chi"cq. nC~nvc4~.c c'ae- : 9UuVC4C45 ~SE,RV;CS CC. l6.~ ~l _..~!ufJ. __. _ . Bete, 7c. DAR2NEA? °EAC ovC4 t. :;999- .. ?%'.: 2^99 .i•oV EV' 4ECC4C ; .. '4C° ?i'R: EVA! PC% 9CY 1'7. ~CA':C+ 9v: 09-'99' Ce"_ 594' ".. ... 09/29/01 ... 05/24/92 . .' m~ "c /19 iP2 ... )5/:9/02 . .o. .r /29;°.2 ev /~,~/o~ ~a~pa/oe "V B'./B1 ":/29/02 , ~ro~ 0`/29/91 ..1'/9' 05/2Y002 ;~/: 'S~ CE /29!02 ,. .'19'02 ~r~0./o. n</29 /9f ,.. ~e. 0`J29/B2 m,ro ~,,o~ n, /24!02 o"x 4A1'S `. St' '-' 4A93E: ' '''0' "5/29/91 ~1c/o1 .... .9. 24 /e: i. .. ."19 /4a ... , .9/29i 01 .._ ,. 09/29"a ...'!9'. ^.5/".9/01 ..... .5'^,9/02 . ... :: /Ze X01 ..:'~'?" :0/:9/02 . :',_, r1c ,o "oS4/9 is S4/?i :2:2 9$ ` 4' .. ° :° RAk:°.C :'. L.Ax093A .__.,._.,~~ 4:. ._.,~ Re:: . rt4c. wn ,N,4. 4~;.-'~ A9=_ <~y~,, ~~ ces ees•, ~.,~5,.,- =a:. !..:cA-9 uv ^ Si 4i." ."'.'~. "+2~'.':7!:, _:SN AY" qc^'AN L °_ iEC^S95 xnV d:hxn~. :.!V:SIO!;. X REC0~495CL!crcC on CN Npv ;__ __ ^cg,o~r:. % RcJA!N ~°75E iECC3CS xdRx N:.p AV % cCR xnym°.::5'0.".` '`.. ,_. B:L'. ?C::. ~c~ngnc CCO °..!N A'^R: xeel~ Jee.. 9EO+ . f'S' 90°* 4AME: c!N4NC° NA!'_ SCR' x,A~4A '; f'95 %`. N9@' 90% C04?M',5 cRCx ['. e' . ._ .e . ..e o'dz• -o ~e• '.CE` .`Ce• A °cl ae° c °clde^ : °c10e^ - e- e !Ee" c: ~e' i ':e- . Falle^ k olae• .1 ". e' . `c?Ce- - ~o'•,ce- :;':r ccl:e' . [^1 Vie. i p_ide. p co`Ce' - co'.Ge~ c :1Ce- - ,wrVrc~n... .:v: 4Nuc .R°:4A. 3c.4AL5 :4C. __ .,.. 5 '46- ... :4452. ,. ,V`R5. IAC. :'. v:9Ce''AVc^9c 74!4c.;Cc CA'rc gceq•.c ,.. .,. Lm'.A4n URc_HA. 3:CROE 'I NUCF_'_4h50V5 YA:~R!!;. N:CYAE. VP" :° !V'c,44A*!CNA'. 'RJCY&. !4"_. VAN9'J ARC '. c_AS!k^ CC. '/d45;.A2: '_[45!V6 COV'RI:' YC4'°'' c~. n W M:SC°LLAN9^.L'S XA'.L 5'Roc.' :7:'4yA_ AAA: ° .;o NASSER4A'; '.AU,q`y' Nn _5 °A45t 'R75.cc ~~;~~. cDs ~.; AES' eV: 'JYi'9: 'BAY N:5 =P,4 q:5°W4° D4CCS:?5 ."5'e4S v. _.. 'd:S yp~~,,cv xpgcup~. . Va C• ro :' 3: u 2. 20 ap !: f5 ;c .N!rV'~x mCNAS h:LL:A'. ASSCC. 0. W; L'.I AkS PR!Vi:4C w:'.'_:Axso~. s scY~r~:9 ~A vu u,• a5. LG_,~d~~9/._~,~.._ ir:z?.tip c _Vx4Y'4i iR:C2: ".q ~. _..'i;• qcr R!cV.4'_ ?CX onY `... = =A'!0', 5.x .. '99' ^A'E 5[r' *Q :5/29/°.: ..- ".5/29!P2 .. :5/29/82 ,,,/,~ .,5;29/?? :'; 9' 95!29/°.2 ,71.., ro, :5/29/92 . :'/c nc /2e ~x2 n;!^'./°.` :9/29/?2 ~ro~ nc /29 /.°: . ': V9' 9E /29/92 ..^'; 9' ::/29/92 . ~C'/" :5:29/92 n./o. ng ,2 c/D2 :7/9'191 ". c.; 29/92 •ro~ ;r /29/,00: . -' ~o. 5/2c X02 :'/°.. .°/29/°.2 . ,.'~a' :=Rico,, .''1:/92 /o' ,u2c/x2 :'/o, ~s/pc/a2 ..:./o, ncr2o 0 A5S ., v-~~.nqi .. .` Ra4cNC cucaresaA :5 RSSOROS ARS SC9E9'.'_`: caR CSS*RUS':04. ?LeAS' !NC!:'4`5 '4E O^...:. C;$?^.5!'!04. 5:^^-1' .4VO 4c'L'49 :O ?N: R°C4SS MANAu M°4, 0!V:S:a", ! '.:CE °.cCOR05 ''-:5*c7 oc, OW MA° A~-- Sc- 055?ROY:.. Y. 45'4 L4 "°OSE gcSOonc MAR% W:?Y A4 X F04 vay.uc. Occ-ySv 'u. ,-~ . ors- - RSSCRCS CDORD!NA?aR: Nee'Y Susa^ •_, ;~. c, nco• VAwc, c!NANCS MA. .4'. ~~a 45'. ~ ::9-'9:~ :X i159 4A,e% 74*$s X` Ev?:' 4OY, ^_Ck°SV'c cROr co'ee- 2 WC'.c5 E SC":? SALE°.:^.. .,.. -o':e- 2 i2 WOLc!9SA4GER. O.F. ..e^ p ct g y!Srn' A5E0.'o :'ce^ A 5z X54OX '.^.5 A4GP c5` -ol:e^ S .` XSR7% : E'_ %C4TC" °c':er 2 Si YUNOS 9!$R75AL SEAV!Se .z- 2 S. v;SSc.Ll4A ECUS ..e 2 S9 :EE MSC!:AL SERV!:c =ear eA4e=: e! ._e•>ktk ~57ce::*e, ._. ,. .ei 4!ENA'- ea% "i/:';°' ::/29!9: aiC'!°'' 't°1°: ~i/.~/v. nS/O9/E1 Ci/n, /a •. OE /29/91 '"/^.'/9' ^,5/29/82 ...... .S!19!91 ^,/v' ^9/29/S1 "t/"v5' :Sr29!99 1iC 'e-~t.~i ~ ~F.'000 '0 4ANOE'. 50 CA'..:` S.: SS4 - e- a R[~4cA.!rJR AccL'NOS 'C-..-.. ~ ^i/~~/°' ^'./19/91 .'[e^ x 4:54 vANACEMS4` °'JBL!SN!N5 ~ ^c 119/91 ..e- 2 ? k:ZZC. R09S4' /n'/e• ny n6/yo/>1 -'ez- ; 4;'1 SAME RA C:4?ER ..:'/?' ".5/29/91 c s' 2 ROA74L'Y1'S4 eA9!YO :'/:,/o. ~S/po!op . -.^ 2 Ra°.!9$09. ;AMSS N. '19' .::19/91 .':e- 2 ~ R07e!aL'SZ. 7A9A O'/C'/9' ".S/19/P2 ..2 a RaE57N L!4c.5 !Na. :'/;, ^'.119/91 cc ~e- 2 9 RO!c5v.'..'.. 07/1'/9' 7E /19/92 .. . ^ 40L'i'.AL', eAa'. ]'/C'l°.' ^'li9/°.1 -.':e^ 2 ' 5 4:SOc.L'-4k°C"5 :,!a'/9' "5/291p2 -_ .e^ A 11 5.7.5.:.O.A. C?/^'/P' :5/29/81 -.... p ,? SAccrv S.o:e!45 554V::S ... ..!tc ,at ... - SA9 95 R4A4O!VO 51114-ISSSSSOR C7/:'!" 75!29191 c ~`:e^ i 'S 5AN 9E4NAAO!4O ".OUkT4-S!ERN Gc '4E SOAR^. ..... .:!29/91 :':e^ A `. SA4 9i a4A~4O!NC aarMUV!CA`!O95 aEP'. =7/: V9' ;5/29/91 ...e^ 0 .' SA9 ESP.NAR^.!9O SOLw,4 cvoSOY$55 OREO!' "V!Ck ^i/:`!9' :512°./92 :':e^ i '9 SAV 9k 44ARO L40 WU4T4-SOOVOM!S ^.c.Vc'OeNE9* .,/ .~ ^, 'o. nc/19/°.1 :`:e- 2 '9 SAk 85RNAkCINO GOUN~° FLOaO COk*Ra'. Ci/".'l8' CSI29/P2 - ._• a 1C SAN ?E44ARC;40 CDLM7Y ?RC9A?!ON nco.. a/" /9'.' .5;29/91?1 ~ / , 1118 `~/ ,~1~ _1L-_------ /0_ ltX~`J1_ -G~~ ~ i;~~ 6. co rycN? NEAR 7a:e: ASS?, 'bF ::.v e"7 ; G!?~ DF RaxcNC DrDAMDxGA Ces:";a cr Not+''¢a:ion Re¢c^• .Hc FCCOVIL4E RECCRCS ARE SCHEDOLEC FOR CES?R'JC?!Ox. PEASE !30!081° +uc 0c-5!.REO 0!SP- :?!ON. SIGN A4C R'.?L'AN ?0 ?HE RECORDS Mp9AGEMEN? DIV!5'.pl. % RECORCS L!5?EC 9ELCN MAY AL! 9. CES?R0°E°. %--RE?AIN !NOSE RECORDS MARK NI?H AN % FOR__ MOh?HS. DES?R0Y ?HE RES*. 9L'L ?C: <!5! RECORDS CCORDINA?OR: Neely Susar OEo. d15' pcpr VAMC: c'NANCc. MA I' cnpr. PA~RN 9A?'.S %` EVEN' 90X WN?EN?5 CROP ?C Pold¢r R 2! SAV 0°R4ARCINC COL'N',° RECORC'.95'S CFF'CE colder A 11 SAR BERNAROINC CO'.'N?Y SHE3!FFS °c?d¢^ t 2: SAY 9cR3AR0!NC COU4?Y SOLIO NAS?E MA.YAGEMc.N' c'.de^ A 2A SAN 9E,¢RARDINO CWN?Y SURVEYOR Po'.de• A 25 SAN D!EGC RO?ARY 9ROOM COMvANY co'.de~ A 1E 5CAG co!de^ R 21 F° SCERANKA h?dec A 28 SCH,RAMY 6 MAL?ER CCN?RAC?ORS 9c?de^ R 29 SCC?? ME9!CAL LA90AA?DR° Po?der A 3C SEARS Po?de^ A 3! SEARS SURD!"S S?CBE :?de^ A 32 SE9NAY/000N'- ca?der A 33 SSND!E JUDY ?'der A Cd SE4EN DAY AU?0 PARTS Po?de^ A 3: SIGNAL MAIN?ENANCE :'. de^ A 35 SCI,^NEAN CAL!FORN?A LANDSCAPE !IANAGE~E4' cc'.de• R 37 5011?HNES` C09CRcrc p~nig,S Ee'. de^ A 39 SOU?HNES?ERN AA6 CO. cc'. de^ A 39 SOO?HERN CAL!FCRY!A GAS CO. Eo?der A AO SOU?NE~R9 CALIFCRN!A EO!SON CO, ,~~A000UN?5 DATABLE C7/C!/A' CE /29/82 cc?te^ R YC M!SCE!LANE075 cc?der A 2 P.CNAUGHAN, R09E~R? P.E. c!cer R 3 PC MASTER-CAR4 F:'.der A R M M!SCELLAN50US Fc?de^ R c. MMASC KEM8ER5H!PS Fal der A 5 GER! MACO45N° Fc'.der R 1 9!L'- MANN 5 A550C. Fc'.der A B 4ARSH. PCLEN9A4 !NC, cc?de^ v 9 KAREN MATC4A" ~c'der tl !C PE' MEARES ~Q/ ~`~ 9e[e: OE°AR?ME9* 4580 °HONE: !l+A?989-'.95! cX7; 2Cg °S4MA.VEY' 4ECOR9 C1R. DES?RCY 4ETR!EVA! 4C% BO% 4^. !008'!04 Sox 0E-199' DAT'_ SE4' ?C: ;'/:'/?' 0E /19/92 ,,!;~/o. ^5/29/92 0VC'!A' :5/29/92 07/7:/8! :5/29/82 07/0'. /8` ^.fi/29/82 07/:!/8' 05/29/82 C7/C!/^.! 05/29/82 01/"!/8! 05/29/02 C7/^!/9' 06/29/82 n?/n~/0, nc /29/81 ni/n./B' CS /29!01 ".i/01 /8' 05/29/82 :'/^'/°i 05/29 /A2 n7/n~/v+ 0E /19/01 01/0'!0' C6 /29/02 :,/0'/9' ^.'./29/82 07 /C VA' 05/29/82 :?/^.'/A' ^.5/19/81 01/^^-'./B' 05/29/82 ^.i/0'/8! 05/29/92 13< !A :2-02 E OE-!984 'BON RANGE: MC ?: RANGE: 4E 07/0'/P' DS/29/P2 :?/:'/B' :5/29/82 07/0'/8' ^-5/29/82 ^1!7"P' 05/29/82 01/01/8' CE/29/82 07/0`/81 0S /29/82 C7/0'/A' 05/29/82 Ci/0!/8` 06/29/92 07/0'/9' ^.E /29/82 71/C!/P! 06/29/81 Cate: 55?. C: "'.!?'~,.^, Cun C,h pM7NGA ;; 9' Ces•^,, . N:' ._ .. r,5 ~o'1.A~c ;VC :Chc ,~.. - C9. rwn; 4 Cc5*4.'C'" 47c vPVA.- - _, c 1„u ,v 4. s;:N: S,ng95 ~°.:5'.i:c AV' ~ •q MAq A-"~, u55+R5- c cc-. ~[ g-.CM C un c 4ECCR^-S VARx q: .OR. tiee',v Ss;- •py. SC4`~. lV ' E_ CCCRCiRA - gcCGR7G o, ANCc _ . _ . _ VAYG. V - .c5 c. _ _._ _ _- m-cV.c __ _ - `_ %' c c. f A. ~'vi .; ~,. siac v... _ ..- - ' ' V~rG :S ~, V 4 :f ASSCC:ArcS ,.c+` c.v' e 7 ~'2 4`Cu AAC uAg7V 'PE`rv . - EupRCV lC7. - c~)de' t ,G cS.CN SCP. ,t n'.^; V ~,. ce,dg. t 1 M4G%~V AyAM'iC Cep 1C0ccm . 4, ~ , 4 :'.AU co:.e~ rpY ANAN~ m`Ir c;':et ~~9 vCNANAN'r^,,V`.C'.p '. cc'.der 6 " r.*~ . rcr lgC. •'ce` ' `~. M~;J'. CG°° 9+5 Ccc, ;Cf4c A9ECC. n,M. n VG"l'c G ''C E- a 22 V'.4.C7^ A1g y gDYV C'-a5' ^:e` 4 P'. .¢vIGCE:'-AVE7U5 ..GE c .c ~ ~, '` eE`'a •2; VAyAX p~acAv 3 DA4q*A:87C. t 2. c a1R, ,gC. -',:e' F 29 NSvc1. '~grcRVA':C&A'• .'Be` V'-9AV~ a :c'ue' t 29 C M:ECE,: pVEC<% c., Ig^ Pt 3, GMN:'q 1C5. MARY .:.e L b: PAC'.°r.g :CAS'. A' GRAVf~, ' e^e 3c. DA.. rc •r RCC ~VI Ic(„ 16 PAC. ' vNn lV:. ,.c :,.:^;e^ t 1' oAlNr a'..,v r R gcgV ... .`:e' oAf g9A c rCRP. .c ;"ce' 0. v/rtnV SA'• 5 ° qEG^:Cr •`.er A •~' vu~.~,Df. BRAY=~. ~ ~g ~.~e. 4 ei! Dl, 4GV^°.ra48Jr lNG CC' G5 POMA . ' ,`de- ° ~, 89i ~ ~ <-A4"TMC-M~ Y.EAC -....- Y. q .. Cace ,EGG fxr.. .._ _ --- o ' vc9uAVCV: q CCAr CCt o•• - _. -- - nc 12°--102 ie :91= '~,~', ,,51291°2 ' .:125!-2 ^'I°~ 'sr 9re2 ~. ~r ~, re' "..2 :51291x2 .irr ;9' a org2 ' „. 1a .7c1129182 ^,1T1e' ,51z91e2 ".~15 05129192 ~.I;t;°1 9G 1x192 0 TIC~1' 05129/92 ,rl:'19` ~ c1~a 102 ^11"`18~ "c 29192 .. ir: .e 751i 20 192 C"~I'1'1e1 75129192 ~' 19 C5/29102 711"'10~' " 29102 w `19'. °6129102 .C''I^C'1?' n5129192 ;5129192 '2~1C'19l 751291x2 711^. 1y. ::129182 C1/IC!11e~' '~ 1291102 r., 1o. .51 7f1291e1 ',;17'le' 75n91a2 .n ~~. j8,~ ^.5129,'•2 ., i:'Ip '„g 241 P2 x,17 i`' .5179192 „ n " n5 ~2c ie2 ^11=`IR' ;5129192 m.!e' n512°.192 .7T1"'JB' 7a:e. C!rv nP RA4CP0 C:CAMCNGA Des;^.ac^ 9ac"ca;!c^ Aeac^' PAGE: 08!5: :'/R/9' •!,rc: ....':28.0 ?HE EOLLOW!NG REWA05 ARE SCHEC'JLEC c0R CE5?4:C?: CH. ~ EAST :MC!CATc rHE gc5!grn ,co :*!C4. 93Y AA0 Rc.?:'AS m ruc 4ECORCS MANAGElcy. 0!V!S!Ok. Y.'+~Ac.CCROS i_!c.cn gc'OW MA° A" 9° CES?ROYcn % RE?AIN ?HOSE REC0R0S MARK Xi?H AN X FOA MCYruS ncc.gOv rME ggS?, 8!" ?C: !15' 4ECORCS CMRC?NA?8R: Hee'.y Suse^. ncoT d'.5! CEP? NAME: c!NANCE eA!L S.OR?: ~°CNE: !.!!?9ES-'85' E%?: 2055 MARY CA?c< ec RMA4Ek? 450030 CTR, C¢c?gOv gcT4!EVAL 90X %: EVEN? 9C% COE'?c!;?5 °ROM ',C 90% N^. LCCA*!ON 9cr. ^.5-199! CAT.' SEN* ?C: :'~e- a <c. 80S'MAS'E? 07 /0!/P' 05/19/81 ':'.der A d' oRIDE COLCR P4E55 :'/"`/E' ^5/29/82 ea Ee^ A e: eP:`."!NG SERVICES/3500305 HG.'T C/^'/°' 0S/ZS/P2 eo'.der A !9 PRCGAESS Y.:LS'i4 :?/0'./B'. C5 /29/82 °c'der ¢ 50 ^L10.L!C EMPLCVC05 RE?:AEMEN' S°S'9 01/0'. /8' :'./29/82 °:?de^ A 5` 0 +:SCE''A1i4~'S ^.i/0'/P1 06/19/BZ cc'.der ¢ 5Z R r!SCc~,-A4vM ~< :7/:,/E, n5/19/E2 ca de^ A 53 4A9CHC C!SPCSA'. SERVICE ^7/^.1/81 "5/29/81 F?der ¢ 5< AAeID CATF :`~.. nq/n./o, ^,5/Z9/A2 °:1 der A 5c. PA:'"S T!RE RcPA!R °?/:`/e! 8'./29/81 P:?Ee- A 5 ~4EG:5'. RAR Cc V",TC_R°. C7 /0!/8' CS/Z9/B2 °c:der A 57 A.Y. RE!?E4 OEVELCoMry? CC. C7/C!/E' ,^5/29/82 Fb?der A SE REMPc'. gE4NAY C?/;'/8' 06/29/82 co?der ¢ 59 4c.VAE'S CIc.R!CAL SERV: CES "7/0!/8! C5/19/BZ ':'der A 57 3ESC!'E R00'c.R :'/".1/E' ::/29/92 °:`:g A :' 4cvACL:S :AN:CC. :VC1/8' 05/29/81 e(/_ p.CCLy (( ;~c apvpo~c n7/^.!/E! 05/29/82 235 1l-01-"Z ...-1989 °4CM 4ANSE ~, C. '^ 419GE: Gck Po?Ee^ A COCA COLD EC -L!CS C^. 80M09A C7M.'/^., 05/29/82 :'der A 2 COCA COLA 80?flLkG CO. =CS 89001 cy ^T/"'/E' ^.5/28/82 colder A COLEMAN 0AA 0?/0'./P' 05/29/82 ':'der a d COL!SGE ?YPSXRCEA 55RV!CE 07/C'./B! 05/19/81 Ec?de- ¢ CCMM SER S4?ER¢R!SES :'/0'./E' 05/19/82 col de• A 5 CCC%/AA?M.'R 640. ^7/0:/8! 0c./Z9/E2 5c'.de^ A ~ °. B. COVEY !NC. "?/0'./P' 05/29/P2 ':!der A E ^.0Y!NG?ON 5 CRCWE '9/"'/9'. 05/29/82 c:?de^ ¢ 8 CROON COMPANv 0?/0!/E! 0E/Z9/P1 cc'Eer A , CUCAMCNGA C0L'Ni° WA?ER C:S?R!C? 07/n:/o, ",fi /09/9Z co?de^ R " CRONN PR!k'E45 C7/0llB! CE/29/82 cc?der A 'Z r.'JCAMONGA eR!N'!4G ^7/^.'/P' ^.c. /29 /P2 c sl der A ~: W: LL!0.4 CO'4EE4' ;AC. 07/;!/E! 05/29/82 ca'.der A !d CYDER? P4Y:L:5 01/^.VB+ ^.5 /Z9/92 l~ ~~ /~- 1~ l_ . ~. 0ea¢. 4ENT A. ~e.e I5. A C4Nc v ..?? CF RAYCHO CJCAMONGA Ces:r..tiw No:!fica:!em ReDO^t °AGE: 9 OA?E: "1/9319! ?!ME: !..-!:330 THE F0.LON!NG RECORDS ARc. SCHEC:'!EO FOR DES?R'JC?!09. PLEASE !XD!CA?'. '. ME DE5I RED CISRO$!?!ON. 5!SY AND RE?OIl4 ?C ?Y.E RECORDS Y.ANAGc-5!EY? 0!V!5!CN. % APE RECORDS .!S?c.0 9ELOX NAY AL: BE DES?RCYEO. % RE?AIM ?HOSE RECORDS MARX NI?H. AN % FOA MOR?HS. CESTRCY rHE RES?. 9!LL ?C; d!5! RECOR^S COORD!NAiOR: Nee'.y 8sac DEP? : 1!S! DEPT SAME: FlNAXCE !RAIL SOR?: °H09E: !T.d `, 989-185! EX?: 3055 •ARN OA?ES °ERMANEN? RECORD D?R. DES?ROY RE?RIEYAL 90% (%! EVER' SO% CCN?EY?E FROM ?C 90% NC. :OCR?!09 Box OA-!99! OArc gcR. r0. fc?der A !c. 0 X!SC°LLA4Enre 07/0!/8' 06/29/82 Fo'.de^ A !5 0JC !EAS!AG 07/0!/8! :5/19/81 ft'.der F CNS ASSCC!A'ES C7/D!/8'. 06/29/82 fc!Cer t !A DAHL. XALCEN ei/:!/B! ^.6/29/92 Fc?der A !9 DAILY REPOR• 01/^!/8' 05/29/81 Po'. der A 20 OAYAUM N. X.C. 07/0!/8'. 05/19/02 Fc',der A 2! OEYNARO Nc-N 01/0!/8! 0'./25/82 fo'.der A 21 0EP? Of ?AANSPORTATION SAN 9ERYARDINO 01/0!/8! 05/29/82 Fc?der t 13 OESER? PAC!f!C CHAR?ER Ci/0!/B! 06/29/81 F:'.der A 24 CE?CO ^,1/C'./8' 05/29/82 Fc'.de^ R 25 DICTAPHONE CiM^!/8! 05/29/°.2 'older A 26 R.F. 0!CXSON CO. INC 01/0?/8' 05!29/92 °c'der t 27 OIETRICH-POST CC 07/0!/0! 06/19/81 Fo'.Cer A 28 :'NCVAN HERSHEY CO. C7/0!/8! ^.6/29/42 °c'.de^ F 29 DVOAAN. GAYCE 07/0!/8! 06/29/02 5!der A 3C 7YAX DIANE C7/0!/B! D6/29/B2 cc!der F 3' E R!SCELA%c.0!'S C7/^,!/8' 05/29/82 Fc!der A 32 EASTMAN !NC. ^.^/:'/A' 05/29/91 °c'.der A 33 ELECi!ON EI(PEYSE APRL !982 Ci/C!/8' 05/29/01 Po'.dAr A 3/ ENDEY, MARRY J. ^,1/^'/B! 05/29/82 fc!de- F 3c, c_MP'_Y. NAARY (PETTY CASH! C7/0!/B! 06/29/82 Fo!dtlr A 36 ?HE EXPIRE 00NPANY 07/^.!/8! 05/19/82 fc!de^ A 31 EXP'CYMEN? Cc-VELOPXEN? CE°'. 07/^.'/8! 06/29/82 Fo'.Cer A 30 ROBERU ESS!G 01/C!/B! 05/29/01 Fvldp^ A 39 F MISCELLA9EOL'S ^.7/0 VB! 05/29/82 Po?der A ID F6E CHECN PAOTEC?OR 31/0'./8! 05/29/02 Fc'de^ A 4' FEO-MAR' F!NAYCE 01/9'/8! 06/29/82 fc!dpr A 12 ff9CE CRAF? 07/0 VA' :5/19/91 °:!dtl^ F <3 c!ELO!IAN. RCLAPP 6 ASSOC. 07/^-!/B'. 06/29/82 Fo'der A 11 F!.AS? AMER!^.AN ?!?LE !Y5. ^.7/".!/8! 05/29/82 co!ae- A A6 °LE?CHER. k~'H 07/0!/81 ^-5/29/81 co'.drr A 16 FNC CORP. 0?/C'./8! 06/29/81 Fc!de^ R Ir sOCTM!C'. LAXX XONER SERVICE C7/3'./B! 05/29/81 Fo!drr A 18 fON1ANA DRYING 1NC. 07/0'/8! 06/29/81 Fo'.dar A I9 FF~RGS?. JAMES C7/^.'./E' 05/29/81 Date: OEPARTM N. O Oate: ASS?, CI?Y A*'OR.- C!?v OF AANCNO CL'CANOII6A Oes!rucfim Nc!"ical5or. Renr: PAGE: !^ CA?E: 77/73/9! nNc; .n:7!:3fi7 rke cC!!OX!NG RECCRCS ARE SCucryo rn pOR DES?AUCTION. PEASE !N C!CArc ?NE OES!REC 7!SPoS'T?ON. SIGN ANC RE?7R4 ?0 ?NE REC0.905 MANA6EY.E9? C!V!510%. % : -REGORGE L!6?EC BE!OX IUY AL: 8E CESTRCYEC. %_ RETA14 ?H ° RECORDS NARK MI?H AN % fOR_ .MO'1?N5. 7E5?ROY ?HE RES?. BIL! TC: d!c.! RECORCS COORDINATOR: Meely Suzan 7EpT ; d!c+ pco* XAXE: F?MANGE URN OA?ES (%! EVEN' 9C% COR?EN?S FAON ?C F'.de^ R SC G NISCE!!A4E0'JS 'older R 5! GENc-RA! S!N7!NG CO. Fc?der R 62 GENERA: ELECTRIC Folder 1 53 GENERAL SE.4V7CE5 PUBLICA?IONS Fc2dar A 54 GEXGE CONSULTANTS Fo'.der A 55 Gc.VERA! TE!r.PNCNE CO, U!! SCR*~ cdC9E: !?'/!989-!85! EN?: 1^.65 cE9NA4EN? REM9C C?R. 7E5?ROY RE'. R!EVA! BO% 97% NC. '_CCA?!C! Box OE-!99• CP.TE SENT ?C: C7/C!i 9: 76/19/81 ?/71 /B'. :5/29/91 C7/C!/B! C6/19/E2 .^7/0`/9' 05/29/82 C7/C!/B! CS/29/B2 ~,~.//1 77/CI/B! 76/29/82 ~'u^ /ACCOr'k?5 DAYA6LE Ci/C!/0! 06/29/81 13T !1-:2-C: 1 Cfi-!989 fRON RANGE: 6: ?C RANGE: !O Fc!der R ~ :N7A!c. FEOERA! SAVINGS Fc!der A 1 GOROON'S INC. ceder R 3 GRAY? JERRY fc'.der A 1 GRIfF!iMS SHARRON fc'.der A 5 GRISSON 6 JOMNSOY co'.der A S GUYS 6 GAlS XORN TOGS Folder R 7 H R?SCE!:A.4E0'JS Folder A 9 XXC REPROGRAPHICS °c'.der A 9 HARMER EOU?PAEN? CO. °c'der p !C HAND?? 6 SO4S fo'.der A ?! HAR?E-NAYRS 7ISTR18!'?!CH colder A !2 HAYES NE!CIN6 GARY F?der R .H!GNXAY 6!GN CC. Fs',der R '.1 ECNARC G. Nll!. JF Fo'.der R !fi N!!!!AB! !. HC'!cv °older A !fi RILLIAX !. HO!!EY rpcnv g,~u Fc!dP R '.i NO!!IOAY RCCN CC. Fo'.der A '.8 HOMERS ?REE SURGERY Folder A !9 S.R. XCY? !UMBER CO. Feder A 10 NUB CONSTRUC?ION folder A 2! !!CY76 NU94S °c!der A 12 M!SCE!!ANEOUS Folder A 23 I85! co'.der A 26 !A!ANC EMPIRE ?URf SUPPLY Dafe: C R?BIEN? HEAD C7/C!/!! 97/7!/0'. 77/7!/B~ ^.1/7!/0: 71/C!/0'. C7/C!/9? C7JC'/0' 97/C!/0! 77/C'./0' 77/7!/A! 7ve/e' 77/7!/0: C7/C'/B' n7~C!/91 77/0!/0! C7/0!/0! :1/71/0! ^.7/71/0! 01/0!/0' 77/M/B! Ci/C!/B! 07/C!/0! ~/ i/9~/0/7//Cy!///0~~! Oeu: ASSt. CIi, Al?CANT Cc./29/B2 Cfi/19/ffi Cfi/29/82 ^6/29/82 75/29/82 ^.5/19192 75/29/82 ^,6/29/81 CS/29/01 ^6/29/92 ^-5/29/82 75/29/92 75/29/81 75/29/92 06/29/82 ^6/29/92 06/29/92 75/19/01 06/29/02 ^6/29/82 05/29/02 06/29/02 06/29/82 5/29/92 ..~ 'rY DE WNCHC COCANONGA 7es:wiNw, Ncti'ica:i on 9ecc^. PAGE: ., CA?E ^7/C?191 *!NE; !0:7!; dnc nc FO!Lg119G AECO305 AR°_ SCHEO:'!EC FOR 0ES'M'C*!CN. PLEASE IN0!CA•` •M` ^EE!RED 'SP7 ,IOX, 5!54 ANC RE^'R%' ?C ?HE REC047$ !fAYAGEM`V• 7!V!5!ON. X- .E ~RECOR95 L!5?E7 BELOX MAv p.._ oc ncgrR7vrn % RE•A!Y •HOSE RECORC$ MAR% NI?H AN % `CR MON?H5. 7E5?ROY •H`- RES•. B1!L T0: 4!E' REWRC5 COOR7INA?04: Nee'y Sosar ncor ; d!x! OcPr NAME; F!9ANCE VAG SCR*: MARX Oprcc ;X; EVEN* 90%CON?M?S FROM , Fc'.der A 15 INLAN9 POHER SXE`_P!RO `older A $ !NBOOE9. 3O5!E `cl dew A 2? INS?. C` ?RA45 ENG!NEERE `c'der A 2P !AS?!?L'?E OF !OCR! SElF-GOV. Fc!der t 19 !N*'! C!?y MANAG`-MENT ASSOC. :'""-e^ 4 30 !9?'L CONF. 9L06. O'F!C!A!S Fc?de- 0 3! IA^! IN5??!!'?E OF ML'9!CIDAL C!ER, `c?der A ?2 J M!SCELLANEOL'S h?der A 33 °. CONCRE?` Fo?der A 31 C R JAESCHNE !NC. Fc'.der t JERSEY IA?ERNA?1998'- GRO!'o Po?der A 30 J!M'S E%%ON SERVICE 'elder t 3^ J09$ AVA0.A9L` `c'rier 1 3b NA!SEA HEAL?.° FC:'N7A?10.1' !NC. `o'.de• A ?9 N M!5CELLAYECL'S o'der A :: Y5: CCMPA9° 'elder A C1 ?OM N`-!9ER `c'rier A :2 !,7. SING ENGINEERS `c?der A A? 7CNAL7 8. KING 6 ASSOC. `c!der A 0: N19N05 5?der P <6 %INAN!5 C!!'B OF RANCHO CUCAMO4GA Fc?der A d5 %!EEN-!!NE OORPORA?'.ON `c?de^ A !7 G!NNA %4!'?SEN `o'. der 1 18 .'OAN NAUSE Fc?der t 64 CHARLES NL'"^. Fc'.der A SC ! !I!SCE!AHE':'S Fo',de~ A 5! JACK !AM Folder A 52 LANCE. SOLL 6 L7NGHARD Fo?der A S? !AN!ER 905!NE$5 PRCCL'C?S Fo?der A Sd LAWSON eRC7L'C?5 !VC. Folder A 5`. !EAGUE C` CAL!'. C!?!ES `c'.der A SE G`.ORGE !EE Fc?der A 51 LENTS HOMES OF CAL:FORR!A Fo',der t 58 l!NV'. LLE.~SA40ERSOtl. HDR9 Fc?der i `.9 LOC%M000 ENGINEERING De;e: 7EPAA?MEN• NEAC Dete: %fCNE: !7!6;989-!AS! `-%?: 2:55 >`-RMANEN? RECCRO C?R. 7E5?4C° RE'4!`-VA! 90% 9OX NC. !OCAT'.ON Box 0$_!ga• Op?c cc4r rC; ;'/: VB' ^-5/19;81 :?/0!/9'. :5/29/91 "7/0!/8' 06K9/AZ ^?/^!/A' 95/19/82 71/;!/8' ^-6/29/82 :^/^.'./9! :5/29/82 %5 ^'/C!/¢! 96/29/91 37 /:'/B'. :5/29/91 01/0!/8' e6/29/B1 "7/0'/B+ ^5/29/81 C7/0!/8! Ofi/29/82 ^N01/A! 06/29/01 0?/0!/8! 06/29,/02 C7/^.!/B! 75/29/82 C7/^!/8' 75/19/82 77/01/8! 06/29/82 M/:'/P' 06/29/81 :?/C!/8! 05/19/92 77/01/0' 05/29/82 01/0!/8'. 76/29/81 07/01/8! 05/29/81 07/^'/0' 06/19/82 71/0'./8! 06/29/82 ".710?/8' 75/29/81 C7/C!/8' 05/19/¢1 07/^.!/8'. 05/29/92 ^r/9'/B! 06/29/82 ^7/0!/0! 76/29/81 77/C!/8! Cf ~~: ¢1 07/0'/8! ^.6/29/81 nr/n~/P' 05!15191 ?7/C?/8! 06/29/81 07/0!/8? 05/19/81 ^-7/0!/8' 05/19/P1 ASS?. C!?Y A•'ORNE 0!?Y CF RA4CXC OL'CAMCNGA Oes;rcatiar. Na:'F iat;!ar. Ae,ar; ?ASE: 12 OA?°: n7!ng/p, n Mc. '...':l3C ?X° °CLLOI8ING REWRCS ARE SCXEO'.'LEC FOR OESTM'C?!04. PEASE !%C!CA?c ruc DES!REC DIS ..!ON. 5I6N ANC RE?URY ?C ?XE RECCRCS MANAGEMER? C!VIS!ON. N E RECORCS L;Scn gu q! ~v Ai! gc CccrROvpn % RE?A:N TXCSc- Ac.COR05 MARX X!?H AN % FOR NCN?X5. 9E5?R0Y ?XE RE5•. 9!L! ?C: 615! RECOR05 CWRO!NA?OR: Nte?V Suse.^. 9c-P? d!5' OEPr VANE: c!NANCE NAI! 504?: MARA CA?EG %! EVEN? BO% CON?EN?5 FROM . Fa'.de^ F EC IOGUc_. SA" Po?der I c.! 'CS AYGELES ?!!IES rc, c,gn rX! Fo'.de• A 62 l05 ANGE!ES TIMES C!ASSIF!EC Fa'.der I 5? M!CXAE! !9NG a'.tler A fit !ORES POXES ?OOLS e"CYc: 'R`!!989-!95' E%?: 2055 ocgMAycyr ocDCRO C?R. 9E5?RCY RE•. RBEVAL 90% SC% 40. !CCA?!0N 9ox Cfi-!99' CA?E SEN? ?C: ^.1/^.!/8! ^5/29/82 ^7/0!/9' 06/29/92 91/0!/8? 95/29/9t n7/m/p. ^.'./29/82 ~~ACCCJ9?S aAYA9LE 07/0!/82 95/29/83 220 !/-03-0'. 5 12-'.990 FRCS' RANGE: ?0 RANGE: 1 c ? cYOED . c n Dorf ~ nce? der A ' Y!IEN. D-V.. 9 -- Fa?de^ A 2 ? M!SCE!lAYE7.'S Folder A 3 *ERM!YAL REN?ALS °a'. de- A t V!YIINNE ?HOMPSW Po?der A S .. ~ !NS!'RANCc. 6 ?4U5' CO. °a'. tler A f TORO PACIFIC D!STRI9'J?ING Fader A ~ •!NC ?09RE2 Fa'.der I e ?AAFF!C NANAGEA!EN• 5Y5?ENS `a?der A 9 ?BANS XES? 'CRC ?RI1CN Fa?der A ?!'AVER'S !NC. Fo'. der A !2 'J N!SCEP.ANEO!'S ca'.tler A '.3 U.S, e05?MRS?c.R Fa'.der 1 !d 'JN'.?E0 EW'!PMEN? CC. Fa?de^ / 'S U9!?ED COIBPU?ING SYS?EMS 'alder A 1E UNIV. D° CAL!cDRN!I REG°A'•5 °o?der A !7 UP!AXD BlOCN 6 BLDG carder A 'P '•Y OF Ca!ANC °a!de^ A !9 L'~RBAY LAND !NS?!TU?E Fa?tler A 20 GEORGE URENA Fo?der A 2' V M85CEL1A9EW5 Fo?der A 22 M!CXAEL VA!P.!R co?dar d 23 VALLEY SWNO Folder A 24 VINEYARD NA?IONA! 8A9% Folder A 25 X MISCE!LANEWS 07/9!/82 C7/:!/B2 ^.7/0!/81 97/0:!82 ?/n,/92 07/0!/82 07/0!/92 07/0;182 ^7/0'/82 3?/0`/82 C7/0!/82 97/:1/82 C7/C'. /82 :?/:1/82 ^.7/9'./82 01/0!/82 n./o2 01/01/92 97/^'/82 :1/C'/B2 07 /0!/82 ^7/9!!82 06/29/83 06/29/83 :6/29/83 05/29/83 95/29/93 ^.E/29/B? 75/29/83 OG/29/8? :5/29/83 06/29/83 0B/?9/83 06/29/83 05/29/83 Dfi/29/83 06/29/83 0E J29/!? 06/29/83 Cfi /29/83 06/29/83 05/29/8? ^6/29/83 C5 /29/8? 96/29/83 06/29/83 95/29/83 ¢ ~~~~ DeEA: D AR?MEN? ~ EAD DAtt: A*?DR. ...?'! OF RANDHC CCCAMON6A Destruc:ian No:'fi:ado- Ae,-ar: PA6E: 13 DATE: 01/73/91 ?l ME: 10:".!:610 ?HE F":LONING RECORCS AAE S.^HEDL'LED FOR CES!k'CTION. PLEASE IXDICA?E THE DEBT RED DIS ` ION, SIGN ANC RETBAX ?C THE RECORDS MANA6EMEN? DIVISION. % RECORDS l15?EC 9ELOX MAY ALL BE OESTROYEC. % RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MAAN NITH AN % FDR MON?NS. CESTROY ?HE RES?. RILL ?0: d?6! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Suse.^. OEP? : 115! 7EP? RAKE: FIXANCE MAIL SOR?: +ARK OA?ES (%! EVEN? BO% COR?EN?5 FROM TC °olde^ A 26 XAL! 5?REE? JOURNAL Fc?der A 21 NASSEAMAN LAUREN Elder I 20 XE! LS FARGO ?RL'STEE Fo'.der A 29 XICXELLE NEX6ER Folder A 30 XES? ENO UNITED MAY (alder t 31 X''-STER4 H16HNAY PRODL'C?S Fo?dar A 32 REST PURLISHIN6 CC. Folder 1 33 XESTERN 60V. RESEARCH ASSCC. Folder A 34 NESTEAN ROCK CC. °a!der A 35 NARY XHITNEY Fa',de- A 3E iHORAS XIEKUN Fo?der A 33 NILCOCK BATTERIES Fc'.der A 3¢ C. XILLIAMS PRIM?!MG 'alder A 39 XILLIAMSON 6 SCHMID Folder A 60 MCLFE 6 Sg15 SALEE CC. 'o'.der 1 dt %ERO% CORP. Folder A 12 ° MISCELLANEOUS Folder A 13 YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE Fa?der A N 2 RISCELLANEO'JS Folder A 19 2EE AEOICAI SERVICE CCCUH?S PAYA9LE ."1/0'./¢2 06/29./83 o4CNE: !7!4?999-!851 E%?: 2^.SE aER31ANEAT REC0R7 C?A. OE5?MY RE?RIEVAL BO% BC% 9C. LCCA?:UN Rox C5-!991 7A?'_ SENT ?C: C1/:: /92 05/29/63 C1/°1/61 06/29/63 Ci/0!/81 06/19/93 07/7!/91 06/29/83 07/:1/02 06/29/83 07/01/81 06/19/93 07/01/82 CE/19/83 07/01/AZ 06/19/83 07/0!/62 06/29/63 01/0'./92 Ofi/19/93 Ci/C!/02 06/29/6? ^.1/0!/62 06/29/93 07/0!/91 O6/29/B3 07/".1/82 05/29/83 C1/C1/e1 Cfi/29/83 01/^.'/81 06/29/93 01/0?/82 06/19/83 71/^.!/02 06/19/83 Ci/C!/82 06/19/9? 01/el /B2 06/29!93 22' !/-03.0' f 12-!990 FROM RANGE: N ?0 RANGE: R Folder A '. N MISCELLANEOUS Ci/0'./91 06/29/83 F:?der A 1 NRI "1/0'/02 ^.5/29/83 Fo'.der R 3 NA?109A'- LEAS'!E CF CI?I ES C7/C!/82 06/29/0? Fa'.der A 1 NATIONAL RECREATION 6 PARKS ASSOC. C?/^-'/AZ ^.6/29/93 polder R E NEMA% lNC. Ci/C!/02 06/29/93 Fo'.der A 6 ?ERRY NEMER 01/0'/02 06/29/83 Fo?de^ A 7 0 MISCELLA9s-OL'E Ci/0!/02 06/29/03 Fal dar A 9 7MN ITAANS 01/01/02 06/29/83 Folder A 9 MARIE ONT NEA05 ".1/0'./82 06/29/83 Folder A ?D P MISCELLANEOUS ,71/^.!/82 06/29/83 ~0/_~/9~ _~~~YA,~,/--~ ~ /erg/ --- -- - --- Deb: CEP RTME.i HE Oete; ASST. C.?Y A??OR2 , c:?Y Df 9Axcre crcAMON6A Ces:rcc;ior. Not!Hicattaf Report PA6E: `e CA?E: 07/:3/9'. TINE: !".: 0!:500 THE fOLLOXING RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR OESTRUCTIp1. PLEASE 1NDICA'. `. ?HE CESIREO DIS. TIOX. SI64 AND RE?'JAN TO ?HE RECORDS MANA6EXENT 91VISIOX. E RECORDS !IS?ED BELgI MAY ALL DE OESTROYcn. % RE?A1N ?H05E RECCRDS NARK MI?H AN % FOR MON?N5. DESTROY ?HE REST. RILL T0: 615! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Xeely Suear. DEPT : 1151 DEPT XAAIE: FINANCE NA'.! SOR?: PHONE: .'ita;989-1851 EXT: 2055 NARK OA?ES (N; EVEN? BO% CON?EN?S FRM ?C Felder t 1! DATT011 SALES CORP fc?Eer A !2 DACIFIC COMPVTER SUPPLY Fclder E !3 PACIFIC PAOUICTS Fo',der A !1 DACIFIC ROCK i GRAVEL Fp?dv A !5 DAB GRAPHICS fc'.der A '.6 P!?XEY 90XLE5 Folder R :7 POMA 015?RI AU?1NC Fo'.der A !B DRECISION MYORAUUC SYSTEMS Po?der A !9 PATCE COLOR PRESS fo'.der A 20 oR1NTIN6 SERVICE/RECORDS MAXA6EMEXT Feder A 21 DROGRESS BULLETIX °c?der A 22 PUBLIC s.APLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM solder A Z3 0 M.ISCELLANE005 so?der A 2/ R MISCELLANECOS fo?der A 26 RECREA?ION REFUNDS Po?Eer A 26 3ANICE REYNOLDS Feder R 27 C:?Y OF RANCHO WCAMONGA Fo?der t 28 RA9CN0 CUCAMON6A EMPLOYEES AC?IVI?I E6 FUXO polder A 29 RAXCNO CUCAMONGA ROA Po'.der A 30 RANCHO 01SPOSAL SERVICE Folder t 37 RAPID DATA, IMO. Po'.der A 32 RAUL'S ?!AE RfPAIR folde• R 33 A.H. REITER OEVELOPMEN? Fo?der A 31 REGISTRAR Of VOTERS Folder A 35 RESCUE ROOTER Po?der A 36 Rltt CAMERA CENTER Fo'.de~ A 31 RORER? RIZ2C Polder A 36 JAMES RCBINSON fo?der A 39 Os.ANNA RODRIOUEZ Fo?der A IC SUE ROPER ,~['."C IACCWNTS PAYABLE 07/07/62 06/29/83 PsRMANEYT RECORC C?R. CEE?ROY RE?RIEVAL eA% 90% NC. LOCATION 9pe Cfi-!99' 7A?E SE4T !0: 07/0?/62 05/29/83 ^7/0!/62 06/29/93 07/0+/82 06/29/A3 01/0!/82 06/29/83 C1/C!/82 Dfi/19/63 07/0!/81 :5/29/63 07/0!/81 06/29/83 07/0!/62 06/29/83 07/0!/82 05/29/83 07/0!/82 06/29/83 C7/C!/82 Ofi/29/83 07/0!/82 05/29/63 07/01/82 06/29/83 07/0!/82 06/29/83 01/0!/82 06/29/83 01/0!/82 06/29/83 07/0!/62 05/29/83 07/0!/82 06/29/83 D1/C!/82 06/29/83 C7/Ct/B2 06/29/83 07/0!/81 Cfi/29/B3 91/0!/82 0E/29/83 01/0!/82 06/29/83 07/01/82 ^.:/19/83 07/0!/82 06/19/83 97/0!/82 ;6/29/83 07/01/81 06/29/83 01/01/82 05/29/83 07/0!/82 Ofi/29/83 O7/C!/82 06/29/83 229 !/-C2-C0 5 !2-!990 Fc?der A 1 INDUT DEtAI RAPID DATA 0!/01/ !2/29/ ~y~ ~ ~ j ,~~16-~---- - - -°°' t~6-v-~~' ---- ----- --' 7ete; DEPAR KENT HEA Oete: A551, CLY ATiOAN C!?'! C' RANCH^- CUCACDNBA PAGE: '.E DA?E: 01l^3/91 ?ICE: 1...1 :fii" iNE P7 !OX;NG RECORDE ARE SCMFCU!'.D 'D,Q DES?,4UCT lON. PEASE IND!CA?E •uc CESI RED D!4P :ON, SIGN ANC AcrpgN TC +uc QEC0274 CANAG4'1cH? OfY'.920N. X E RECORCG US?ED 9E!CN M,4Y AV. 9'. DFSTRC`!ED. K_~RETAIN iNOSE RECORCS CARS N; iN AN X FDR _NOIVTHS. DFGIROY ?HE QEF'.. BE!! ?0; A!E' RFCOR05 COORDlNA?OR: Nee?y' Scar 9EP? : /!E? DE°? NACEe 9!9ANCE '!AC~_ SOR?: viApg 7A?EE (X'. EYEN* 40% CGN?EN'S c40" ~. Polder A 2 Vc.NCOft CPOA'E4 '°?!dY/er A 4C77UN? ?!?;E CHANGES ~" 'ACCWN?5 PAYAd~_E Ci/^`/02 CS/29/8? cgnx SIu4GE: A °NOXE~, f7'A!909-'0c.', _'%?: 2CFE °'RCANEN' 4SCCA0 C?R. 7°<tQnv pnR3EVAL 90z 40z 97. ICCA^. D4 9ox CE-!99' DATE SEN? Tf: ;'/^. V42 '2/24143 ;'!^:/E2 '.2129/07 13' =-02-02 2 '2-1990 ?G RaNGE~. C0 E9G Felder A ' A MSSCELLANECDb ".i/^.'/92 "•6/29/4? =c'der 4 2 A-4A0LE !OCC b KEY "?/0'./92 :5/29193 °c'.°e^ [ 0.p-1Rr°_ BR':N1G 7T/"1/81 Cfil19/03 sa de^ 4 C A-' U4E9 "L7'/A1 76/29/93 °c'de^ 4 P-' 4VRSFR:55 C1/0•!82 06/29/03 =c'der A 5 1-' `DRF 'RR!GA?!OY 71/7'.102 05/29/83 °olde• C ~ AnR ?;RE SE0.Y:C5 C7lC'/82 06/29143 'o?de,° A e AC1!ON ?AAVF! AGENCY 771^.!182 06/29/83 '°?der a o AGR:CUL?URA! 70MCtS5t04 .'/7442 :5/19/4: ??dar A A!"ACeRA 'CDN^,4Y CC. D7/"^1/02 :8/29/43 °olde^ A i' A!T0. AIR. HEd71NE. 0./C :?M.!l82 05/29/03 ':'de^ A !2 A!`A Fi RE '.OU!PMEN? CC. "-'17:/82 75/29103 col de^ A fl AL7A LO!AA F!OR'.5? 03!7402 04129143 'o',der A 'C A!lA !OMA R13H FCN00! ^-T/^.!IB2 Cb124/83 `a'.de^ C :'. A:?A RA%CNC 3LA9F b Y,IRRCR C?/7'/42 00129/4? °nl.'er A 16 AMERICAN E!ECLQ!C 7714!{01 75!29193 fc?Cer 4 '.? ACER!CAR P!A4R!4£ ASE7:. 02/"^.402 ^612914? Folder A 10 AM~R:CAN P90T'CT!ON 1N^,. 77/"^1!02 ".4/29/43 Po?der A +9 AMERICAS' PDBL;C NCRNS 0.55^.~ ."?/C1 /02 05/29/83 k?der A 2C AMERICAN SCC IF?Y P74!!D 4CMLN . 77/07/01 ".6129/03 folder P 21 AR80R N!'RFERY lNC, ^1/C'J92 06/291E3 'c'der A 22 IRRDN TRJC% 900'^'_F 77/91/42 06/29!03 T A4 folder A 23 A550C?A1EC E46I4EER5 •VT./02 46/24/83 , ~ J iy folder A 24 ADDIDN GAAPH!CE SYF?EMS 77/7`82 95/29/83 ~ ~~- 'c'dev A 15 A"'M'!Er BFYER!° :7l^.1102 76/29/43 °:'der A 26 9 NISCELDANEOUS 7L^?/fl2 76/29/03 01de• A ~ 2~ 96N ELF7TRIC ^-7/9'/82 06/29/0: ~ Fa?de~ A ^ 28 9U51 NE05 :'r.'.NF', RENN75 7°17 V92 76/29/09 $ ,_ C: TY ATTCA SST DA~e: CEP MENi .. AC . Date; :!T° :` 4ANCHC CL'CAMOIVGA Oes:rue:im kc:: cccat'ar. RePC•: ?Hc cOL!OX [NG RECORCS ARE SCHEOL'LEO FOR CES?RL'C*. !OM1 o~cgGc !yv7Arz THE CES!AEO CISPDBI?ION. S!SN ANO RP!'RN ?0 rue RECCR03 ML4AGEMEy? DIY!S!ON. % ._ ~RECORCS !!B'E^ BELOX MA7 A'J_ 9: 988?RO7EC. X RE?AIN ?NCGc. RECORDS MARK XI TH AN % FOR MCM?HS, OESTRC7 THE RES? 9I!L ?0: d!5! RECORCB COOR7!NA?OR: Nee?y 8usar 9EP? 015! Oc.PT 9AME: FINANCE MA!! SCR? MARK 9A?" (X9 EVEN? 9DX CONTE4'E °R0~ .. Po?de^ A 29 BANN OF AMERICA Felder A 30 9ANN OF 9EVERL° MILLS Felder R 3' 9ANN OF AMc.R!CA: N? 6 SA Fc?de' A 32 BARCO MUNICIPAL PROD!'C?S Fclde^ R 33 BASELINE NARONARE °c?der A 3e 3!GHCP CCMPgyy k?der R 35 9LACNSCB!c.GEft. RCSEANN Fa',der A 3S 3LANE, MOFFI??, 6 ?OXNE Po?der II 37 BLEV!N3, DAVE cc!der A 38 9LUE CROGS OF SWiHFRN CAL!PoR91A Fclde^ P 39 CLAAN BOAROMAN CC.... co'.de• A dC BCCX POBL!SH!9G CC. Fs'.de^ R d! OE981c. BR!OAE3 Fcl der A C2 9AONN BRO?HERS ACJUS?ERS Fclde^ A <3 BURN. F!070 ':'der A !! BURN R09EANN F.'.der A <c. BUS!NE39 CO!!PC'?cR SY9iOMS Polder A d6 C NISCELLANECL'S Po!de^ R 61 CSULA FW4CA?!ON ~,co?der A d9 C G ENG!Ac.EA!YO `,yl'!' 'AC:OU4?5 PAVA9LE ccl col .cal Fc? Fc? Fol c.i °HCNc^: '710 3989-185! °%?: 2085 °cgMANEX? RECCRO C?R. 786?907 RE?RIEYAI 90% 90% NC. LOCA?ION Box 7fi-!99! DAiE 3E!t? ?C: "-VC!/82 77/9!/92 0'/9'/92 CI/C!/82 Ci/C'/82 97/07/82 01/C?/A2 ;7/01/82 77/9!/02 77/0!/82 C7/0!/B2 91/^.'/91 91/0!/82 07/0!/82 Ci/C'/82 07/0!/82 97/7!/82 ^7/0!/82 77 /C!/B2 95/29/8; 76/29/83 CS/29/A3 06/29/83 9E/29/B3 ^.5{29/8? 76/29/83 76/29/83 76/19/83 76/29/83 76/29/83 98/19/83 05/29/83 76/29/83 0fi/29/B3 76/29/83 Cfi/29/A3 76/29/83 06/29/83 ^.6/29/83 C7/C!/02 C6 /29/93 232 '.l-02-02 3 12-!990 cROM RANGE: CALIF S`A'E *0 RANGE: F der A CA'!cORN IA 8?A?' 9EP*, Cc MC?OR VEM!C!ES der A 2 CAL!FCRB!A STA?E 7EP?. 9f ?RANBPOA?A?!ON der A 3 CALL FORN!A OEN?A! SERVICE de^ 0. d CALIcORN IA cECERA! SAVINGS b LOAN der A c. CA!!PoR4!A :9L'ANA_ der A S CAL!F049!A ME'9!C!PAL 5'S!NE35 'AN ASSCC. de^ A 1 CA!IFORN!A °ARR3 d RECAc.AT!C4 der A 8 CAL If0~4N IA SOC. OF MUN!CI PAI F18ANCE OfFICEA3 der A 9 CA!LAGHAti 6 COMDAN7 der A !0 l0U!S CAMP9E!! Date: 9EDARTMENT HEAD late: 9 71/7'/82 ^.6/29/8? 07/9'/02 96/19/83 Ci/C1 /A2 Cfi/29/83 :7/0'/82 95/29/83 C1/.!/02 05/29/83 C7/C!/A2 06/29/83 07/0'/82 ^.5/29/03 C7/C1 /02 ^-6/29/03 07/71 /82 Cfi/29/83 7/0:/81 96/29/83 ~f~Ar?OR4o- C'.?Y CF AANC9C COCAM01lGA Destruct!o^. Xct~"caticc Repert PAGE: DA iE: 77/73/9! TINE: !7:02: C!0 THE PoLLONING RECORDS ARE ECMEDULED fOR DESTRUC7IOX. PLEASE 1ND!CA?E 'O0 7E5!REC DISPOSITION, S1GN AND RE?UAN TO ?HE RECORDS NINAGE!AEN? DIVISION. % RECORDS LISTED BELOX NAY A'.L 9E DEE?ROYEC. %__RE?A1N ?HOSE RECORDS MARN MITH AX % FOR MONTHS. OES'. ROY iH'. AES?. 9ILL T0: 11fi1 RECORDS COORDINA?OR: Neely Susan OEP? e!6! DEP? NANa.: FINANCE MA 1! 50R?: o!IONE: !7111989-185+. '.%?; 2^.55 N^IR% DATES P'.SMANEN? REC7RC C?R. CES?ROY Aa.?R!EVAL 9C% (%,`. EVEN? BO% CONTEN?G FROM ?C 8D% 90. .OCA?!ON Bax 7E-!99! DA?E SEN? ?C: Fc'.der A 1! CXAFFEY HUMANE SOC1E?Y 01/O1 /82 7fi/29/83 Fo'.der A 72 CNAFFEY 'JN30N H.S. DISTRIC? 77/0!/P2 :5/29/93 Fo'.de^ A 3 CHAMBER OF COXMEACa., RANCHO CUCAMONGA C1/0!/B2 ^'.129/83 Fc?de^ A !1 CNEYERON USA INC. 07/".1/92 :5/29/83 Fc?de^ A !5 MARN CHRIB?OPXER CP.EVMJIE? 77/°1/82 75/29/6? Fc?der P !6 C1?Y CLERKS ASSOC. Of CALIFORNIA 97/0!/82 :5/19/93 Folder P !7 C!TM'S MO?ORB Oi/0!/82 05/29/83 Folder A 18 COCA COLA 90??L!N6 CO.. POMONA 77/^!/82 :5/29/83 Fc?de^ t !9 COCA COLA 80??LING CO., PASADENA 07/01/82 06/29/83 Falder M 27 CMAIS?I NE COFFMAN 07/0!/82 05/29/83 Fc'.der A 2! COLEMAN DAN 07/0!/82 OE/29/83 Fc?tler A 22 COLLEGE ?YPEXRI?ER SERVICE 77/0!/92 75/29/83 folder p 23 COMN SER a.N?ERP9!SE5 C7/C'./B2 ^6/29/83 'o?der 4 21 COON/ARTHUR 71/0!/82 ^.E/29/B3 Fa'. der A 25 N. B. COVEY, IXC• 77/0!/82 7E/2a/B? Folder A 26 CCVINGION 6 CRONE 07/0!/82 05/29/83 `a?tler P 27 CRONN PRIM?ERS 07/01/82 05/29/83 Fa?der A 28 CUCAM09GA C^'JN?Y RATER DISTRICT 07/0!/92 7E/29/B3 Folde^ A 29 CUCAMONGA FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER 07/0'/82 05/29/83 Po'.der A 37 CUCANILN2GA PRINTING 77/0!/82 06/29/83 Folder t 3! XILLIAN CL'?H8'.RT, 'NC. 07/0!/82 06/29/83 Fo?der 4 32 D !I!SCE!LANEOUG 07/0!/82 06/29/83 Fc?der A 33 DA?:° ~RE~aJR` 77/M /82 ^.6/19/93 Falder A 31 OEM ASSOCIATES ^.7/01/82 ^.6/29/P3 'cider A 35 DNS ASSCC:A'ES 07/71/B2 06/29/83 Fc?der P 36 OAHL A!CHARC 7T/0!/82 05/19/83 'c?de^ A 37 XALOEN CAH'. MAIN?ENANCE C7/C!/82 C5 /29/83 Fc'.der a 38 XEN DE9NARC 07/0!/82 ^.5/29/83 Fo'.de^ A 39 OESER? PAC?FIC CHAR?ER C7/7!/B2 7E/29/83 Folder A CO DE?CO 77/0!/92 7E/29/83 fc', der A 6' DIAMOND 1N?ERNA?ZONAL CORP. 07/0!/82 75/29/83 Fo?der A 12 OIC?APNONE 07/0?/B2 ".5/29/83 Folder A 43 DIE?RICH-POS' CC. 07/71/Bt 05/29/83 Fo'. der A /1 JAMES COOI IN D7/C!/B2 05/29/83 Falder 1 /5 DNORAN G A'!LS 7/0!/82 75/29/83 ~ ~~ Date: DE A TNEN* MEAD Oate: A55?. CITY ATTO ;:'.° OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Oesaoa:lan Nxifica:iar. Repor: PAGE: !8 7ATE: 07/03/9! TIME: '.0:72:OM ?HE FOL;ON!NG RECORDS ARE SCHE7ULE0 PoR DESTRJC?!ON. PEASE INOICA?E ?HE DES!RE0 C:5P05:?10Y. S[GN ANO RETURN i0 ?HE RECORDS MANAGEME9? 0!VISION. % H° RECORDS L:F?ED BFlON MAY ALL DE DESTROYED. % RETAIN ?HOSE RECORDS NARK MITM AN X FOR MOX?XS. DESTROY 1HE RES?. A!LL ?C: 4!5! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Nee'.y $usar. OEP? :115' DEPT XAME: fINANCE MAIL SOR?: MARK DA?ES %: '.VEM? 87% CON?EN?5 FRO!! ?C aNCNE: !7!:;989-'85'. E%?; 2755 PERMANENT 4ECORC C?R. OESL40Y RETRIEVAL 40X BO% 90. LOCA?!ON Sox 06-199! DA?E FEN* TC: fcl der A e5 CYAN DIANE 01/01/82 Ofi/29/80 fcl der A d7 DYNAMICS GRAPHICS 07/0'/92 06/29/83 Folder A dB : MI5CELLA4E0'.'S 97/01/82 06/29/03 `alder A d9 EAS?MAN !NL. 07/01/82 :6/29/03 folder A 57 E!ECTA!C SUPPLY DIS?. 01/0!/02 06/29/03 Fc'.de^ A 5' ''-MPEY. XARRY J. 77/01/02 75/29/8? Polder A 52 ?HE EMPIRE CO.. Ci/C!/B2 05/29/83 Po'. der A 53 EVANS KEVIN 07/0!/82 06/29/83 fal de^ A SA ' MISCE!LANEOL'S Ci/C1/AZ Ofi/29/83 `older A 55 FMC CORP. 07/0!/02 76/29/03 folder A 56 ' 6 E C9ECA PRO?EC?OR 07/0'/02 06/29/03 Fal der A 57 FI ELDMAN, ROLAPP d ASSOC. 07/9!/82 05/29/93 gal der p 50 °: RS? AM, TI?LE INF. CC.. 07/0+/82 06/29/83 Fader A 59 FON?ANA PAVING CO. 97/.^!/82 05/29/83 'alder A E7 f00?HI L'. f:RE OISTRIL? 01/0!/82 Ofi/29/B3 Folder A 51 fCOTHILL INDEPENDENT BANK ^7/0!/82 06/29/83 Fader A 62 PoO?M!L! LONNMONER SERV!C'. 01/01/82 06/29/03 F o I der A 63 f4pST, JAMES 07/.^!/81 76/29/03 ~ J / M~9 Y ACCOUNTS X'` PAYAB!E 01/0'./81 06/29/83 23? !d-02-02 4 '.2-!990 FROM ,RANGE: 5 'C RANGE: folder A S MISCF0.ANE0'JS 07/C1/82 06/29/83 folder A 2 SCAG C7/C!/82 75/29/03 'elder A 3 5 C 5 9 C A 71/^.!/02 05/29/03 Folder A a SAFETY S?RI PING $ERV'.CE 07/OIl02 06/29/83 folder A 5 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOC. GOV?. 07/01/82 Ofi/19/03 Foc.der A 6 SAN BE4NA4DINC COUNTY CLERK OF 90ARD 77/01/82 76/29/83 folder A i SAN 9ER4ARCINO COUN?Y ECONORIC DEP?. 97/0'/82 O6/29/B3 folder A 0 SAN FERAA~401Y0 COUNTY PROBA?ION 07/0!/82 06/29/83 Folder A 9 SAH 9EPNAROINO COUN?Y RECORDER C7/^.1/02 76/29/E3 Poc.de^ A f0 SAN BE,PeAR7LY0 COUNTY SHERIFF'S 01/01/82 06/29/03 Folder A !' SAN BERNAROINO COUN?Y SOL!7 XASiE 01/01/82 CE/29/83 foc.der A :2 SAN 9ER!IAROI N O UNT Y SURVEYOR C O 01/0!/8 06/29/83 / Q ~ . ~ ( ~ / CE FNT N l SS1 D C1? A?i0 ace: ace: A . C!?~ OF RANCHO CL'CAMCNGA Ces: r...~,r. 9cE'N'.:z^cr. RePCr• PAGE: '.9 7A?E: 77/73/9' r!MC; f7.7 n n 2:,7. ?HE POLLONING RECOR05 ARE SCNECO,EC °C4 DES?RL'C?IOk. PLSASE !NC!CATE roc C45!REO C!SPJJB:?;CN. SIGN qND REr.'.'W ?C ?°E RECCROS !IANAGEMEN? 7!V!5!ON. % HE R`_CORCS L!5?EC BE'_OX ,MAY A:'_ 9E OESr~RCYEC. %_RE?A!N ?HOSf ~RECCRDS MAAN X!?H AN % FOR__ !ION?H5. DES?ROY ?HE R'_S?. 9!L'_ ?C: <!5' RECORCS COORO[NA?OR: Nee'.y Susan ncP* d15'. CED? AAME: `?NANCE LAL' SCR': oupyE: :7!d)989-1951 E%?: 2CE5 NA,4N 0A?ES cERx,ANEN? RECCRO C?A. 7E5?MJY RE?R!EVA'_ 9C% %? EVENT _____________ ___ 9C% CON?EN?5 °RC• ?C _________________ ____ ___ _ 9C% 90. LOCA?!ON Sox C6-!991 OA?E 5E4? ?C: %o?der F .3 rn' T '________________ on r SA4 9'.RNARC!NO ...JNT° ,RA45 .,R AL C9 __________ 77/01/02 _V _____' . 5/29/0, ________________ Polder 0 11 SA9 CI',GC RO?AAY 9ROOM CC. ^7/0!/82 76/19/03 °elder P 5 SC!EACr, CYNAMICS COAo. ^C/0'/02 06/29/03 ':'der A 'E SEARS. AOEBUC% 6 CO. 71/^'; 92 75/29/83 °c'.der F 17 .°.'CY 5'_MPLE C1/7'/82 CE/29/83 °o?der A !0 SEYEH OAY AU?0 PAR?S 77/0!/82 76/29/03 °o?der A '9 S!GAA! MAIN?'_NANCE C1M.!l82 76/29/83 ':?der 9 27 409ER? SM!iH 77/0!/82 75/29/83 Fclde^ P T SCU?HERN CAL!FORY IA EOISON CC. 07/7!/02 76/19/83 °:?der P 21 SCL'rucflN CAL!PCRN!A SAS CO, 07/71/82 75/29/83 °:'.der P 23 SCU?HERN CAL!POR4!A LAMO5CAP'_ !RGY?. 77/0!/02 05/29/03 °older P 21 SCl'?H',RN CAL!FOR4!A Ml!N IC.`oA'_ A?4 LE?!C 'E CE RATID4 7'/0'/81 76/Y9/83 °c''de^ P 2'. 50L'?HERN CALffO4N'!A P'_ANN!XG CONGRESS 77/0!/81 76/19/83 °:1 der A 2E SAM SPAGNOLA 77/0!/82 06/29/@3 °c?ee^ P 27 SPARM!'_??5 77/7'./02 Cfi/29/03 older A 18 5?A?E 90AR0 OF EOL'AL12A?!GN 77/0!/02 06/29/03 Folder A 19 S?A?'_ CONPENSAr. !ON !NS. FL'NC 77/0'/82 06/29/83 °o''.der A 3C 5?A?E PAPN INSURANCE CO, 07/0!/02 76/29/03 Po?der A 3' S?A?!ONERS CORP. 07/^_!/82 76/29/83 'older 4 3i ~40BE9? SL'LLI VAN, D. E. T/"'. /02 75/29/93 °alder P 33 SU3 ?El`.GRAM C7/^1/02 06/29/93 °:?der t 31 SUPER!9?E9^EN? 000Uk'_N?5 :7/71/92 75/29/83 `o ld er P 35 S'.'flVEYORS SEAYICE CC. ^1/71/02 7:/29/03 7 _ A~ ](10" /ACCCCI^5 ` PAYABLE 97/:'/92 :':/29/93 236 1d-7i-0! !2-!990 '40w RANGS: G ?C RANG°: ! `cider a G N!SCELLANEOUS Po?der A 2 GENERA: FINDING CC. 'o?der a SE4E~4A'. ',LEC?P!C `c?de^ A < GENERAL ?ELEPHOAE CC. °oNer A '. GENERAL IMOLESALE PROWC?S Folde^ A '. GLENDALE PEOEAA! SAVINGS Polder p i GOME2 41 CN 77/71/02 7?/7!/e1 07/0'/@2 01/7'/82 77/0!/92 ^ /0/81 7e;e: 155?.:1T° A?~ 05/29/03 05/29/93 76/19/83 DE/19/@3 ^.6/29/93 Cfi/29/@3 ~e6/29/03 C!`Y DE RANCHO 7UCAMOX6A DeS:rJ".'.1 or, No;i".ca:i ac Repc.^: PAGE: ZD DA?E: 09/D3/9! ?!Mc. tn,02: 110 ?ME f0!!Olf!NG R°^„RO ARE SCHEWLEO FOR DESTRUCIION. PEASE INO!CA?' ?HE DES!REO DISP !CM, 5!GN /ND RE?URN ?0 ?H'. ~4ECORDS MANAGEMEY? 0!V!5!ON. .NE RECORDS L!STED 9E!ON NAY ALL BE DES?ROYEC. X RE?AIN ?NOSE RECORDS MARK NI1N AN X FOR MOXTHS, 7ES?ROY ?NE A'.5?. B:L! ?C: d!5' RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Suser. DEPT :115! DEP? NAME: FINANCE MA!L SOR?: PHCWE: (1!!!909-'95' '%?: 2:55 MARK DATES ~ERMA9ER? RECORD C?R. OESiROY RE?RI'-VAL 90% %` EVEN? 4Ok CUN?EN?5 FAgE i0 90% N0. !OCA?!DA' 9cr. 75-:99' OA?E SEN? ?C: fcl der 0 e GORDON'E !9C. C7/".!/82 CE/29/0? Folder I 9 GRAN? JERRY 71/9'/92 7fi /29/83 fclder t !7 GRI ff!?N SHANNC!! 77/^!/P2 75/29/03 Folder t !' GUYS 6 GALS MORN ?OGS "-'/^.1;92 96/29/03 Po?der A !2 " M:SCElLANEO!'S C1/7!/02 06/29/83 Folder q 3 EAAKER EpU1PMEN? CO. 71/.^!/BZ 76/29/83 Folder A Id MAINES 5 CC.. I9C. C1/C1/B2 OS/29/B3 solder A 'S NARTE-HANKS DISTRIOU?ION 77/C1 /0Z 76/29/03 solder A !E GARY HAYES Xs.!OING 77/71 /BZ 75/29/BC solder A !7 HERCNENROEOER. 9,4YCY C1/D!/02 76/29/83 Falde^ A !4 NIGHXAY SIGN 6 SUPP!" :1/:!/02 76/29/03 Polder A :9 NOLLIDAY AOCK OC. INC. 7U^.1/82 75/29/03 foltle^ A ZC ACL.EY, N!LLIAM 71/^.'/0Z OE/29/0? °older A 2' HOLEY, XI ILIAM ;PE??!' CASH; C1/T/02 76/29/83 alder A 22 S.M. HCY? LUMBs-R C1/".'/02 ^.E/29/03 so?der A 23 HCMEA'S TREE SURGERY .Or:^^-'/92 ^6/29/83 Polder p 2! ! %!57E!!ANEO!'S Ci/7'. /02 75 /Z9/03 fcl der R 25 !9M ^/3!/82 :5/29/03 Polder A 2: : u S SERY:CE5 ^.7/7'/02 75/29/03 Folder A 21 IM90DEN, JOSIE :7/71/02 76/29/03 folder R 20 IN!ANC 's-MP!RE NRF S'JcP!" CI/71 /B2 Cfi/29/0? Folder A 29 INGRAM PAPER CO. 77/^.!/BZ ^.5/Z9/83 Folder A 37 INS?!?'J?E Of T.RAYSP. EYGRE. 77/^!/02 06/29/03 folder A 31 INi'! C!?Y ,MGM?. ASSCC. ^.7/;1/92 :6/29/03 solder A 32 !N!'L C09f. 9'J!LDiN3 0°.f !C!Al5 XN!?', !ER 71/7'/42 C6 /Z 9/03 Folder A 33 IN?'! COYF. BU!!DING OFF; C!A!5 N. CCV!NA 71/^.'/82 ".6/29/83 ~~ACCOUNT.S PAYAB!E Di/01/BZ 06/29/0? 239 'A-72-D' S Ofi-'.99^- P4CM RANGE: J `C RANGE: M 'older A ' J N!SC'-U-ANEO!'S --^1; C'/BZ 76/29/83 stl t.de^ A 2 J.N. CONCREIE ".i/^-'/BZ 75/Z9/83 Folder''11A 3 C R JAESC4NE INC. 77/;1/02 CS/29/83 c .der R d E4SE" Yi'L GAOUD YC. 1/^'./91 5/29 F t~we~~~~OE. i,E __D _____-~ D~e}I~~ASS__ "0 /03 ..?Y OF RANCHO C7CAMON'GA 9es:':~:ior. Nc:i'i c^aao,^. ReCCr. PAGE: 2'. 7A?E: 07/93/9'. ?:ME: 19:02: !<0 THE FOLLOX!NG RECORDS ARE SCHEOJLEO FOR DES?RVC?!ON. PLEASE 1ND:CAi° ?ME 7E5!RE0 C16POS:IIOV. SIG9 AND RE?L'RN TO ?HE 3ECORDS MANAGEMEN? DW!SI04. XXiHE AECOROS L15TE0 BELOX NAY ALL BE OESTROYEO. %__RFTAIN TH SE RECDRDS !TARN Nl?H AN % FOR__MONTNG, DESTROY ?NE RES?. BILL ?0: 4!5! RECORDS COOAOINATOR: Neely Suter OEPi : 4!5' 7EP? NAME: f1NAXCE MARK BATES (X! EVEN? 80X CON?EN?S f.40M ?C Folder A 5 J095 AVAI'ABLE 'older A 5 .90NAL7 JOHNSON Fc'.der A 7 KAISER f0UN0AT?ON HEAL?° PLAN fc'.der A R NIXANJS CLUB/RANCHO CUCAMONGA folder A 9 NLEEN-'_INE CORPORA?ION fclder A 10 X.NU?SEN. G1NXA Folde: A 1! 0c.8BlE NOSLOVICH Folder A !2 %AUSE, JOAN folder A 13 .MARY NUHX Polder P !4 XUNi2 CHARLES folder A !6 lAM JACX folder p !5 :ANCE, SOLL 6 LUNGNARD Polder A !7 LANGON PROOUCT.G ING, folder A 10 !EAGUE Of CALIFORNIA ::?!ES SACRAMEN?0 Folder A !9 LEAGUE Oc CAL?PORN?A C!TIES BERXcLCv folder A 20 LEONARD OAVIO Faller A 2' LINVILLE. SAYOERSON 6 HORk Fc?der 4 11 LOGUE, SALLY Folder A 23 LONG K!CHAEL folder A 1/ LOS AN0ELE6 11ME5 polder 9 $ MC M?SCELLANEOL'S 'older A 26 ROBERT MCNAUGNAN Folder P 17 AICMAHAN OESN OF ON?AR!C colder A 18 NCMAS?E,4-CARR fa',der A 29 B!LL C. MANN ASSOC. folder A 30 MARKS R:CX folder A 3! JOHN N,AR??N fo'.der A 31 %ARE9 MA?CMAM Folder A 3? M!JAC AIAR!I SYS?EMS 149. Polder A 31 JDN MISc.LS Folder A 35 SNARO!7 M:LNE-COFFEE FUNC folder A 36 S9ARCN M!LNE-PE??" CASH Folder I 37 M;?CHELL b SONS PLCMBINO Folder A 3B Xl?EY Ml?E iERNITE 6 PE9? CONTROL Folder A 39 MJL?I COPY SYS?EMS Date; DE AR?MEN? HEAD - Daee; MA!L SOR1: eXONE; :7!11909-!86! :%?: 2055 ocR!IANEN? RECO.4C C*R. 0'.97407 RE?,91EVAL 90X 90% N0. LOCA?!ON Sax 0E-:99! OA?c. SEN• ?C: 07/."!/81 95/29/9? ".7/"'/02 05/29/93 Ci/91 /02 05/29/83 01/0!/82 06/29/03 77/7V02 7fi/29/03 07/7'/82 95/29/03 07/0+/82 76/29/83 :1/91/82 06/19/83 97/0';82 06/29/83 M/C!/B2 :5/29/03 C7/;!/A2 06/29/83 01/^.!/82 76/29/03 Ci/0!/02 06/19/83 07/7!/02 75/29/83 C7/C!/02 06/29/83 07/;!/82 06/29/83 C7/C!/81 C6/29/e? ;7/0!/82 76/29/83 77/0!/02 06/29/03 77/0!/92 76/29/83 07/0!/82 CE/29/03 01/0!/82 76/29/93 07/01/82 0fi/29/83 91/0!/82 76/29/03 77/01/82 06/29/83 ."7/0!/82 05/29/93 07/0!/82 06/29/8? 07/0'/82 75/29/03 07/0!/02 06/29/83 07/^'/82 05/29/83 C1/C!/02 75/29/83 97/0'/82 05/29/83 C7/"1/82 06/29/83 07/01/82 05/29/83 C!/B2 fi/29/03 A ?. C A??0 ,.?Y OF RAYCHC CE'CAMCNGA OesV°c:icr Nc;'Hca:i o;. RePCr; PAGE: 22 9A?E: ^T/^.3/9! TIN': !C:02:380 ?HE FO!LONING RECORDS ARE SCHEWLED FOR DESTR'JC?ION. PEASE !YC!CAi° .. 7E5!REC C!SPOS!?ION. SIGN ANO RE?URN ?7 ?HE RECORCS MA4AGEME4' C!Y!$lON. %XTHE RECORDS !15TE0 BE!ON MAY ALL 9' :S6?RCYEC. %__RE?A!N ? OSE RECCR7S MARK N!?H AN x FCR___MC4?HS, CESL40Y '. HE RES?. 6!LL TC: d153 P,ECOROS COCRCINA?OR: Neely Susar. 7EP? : d15! CEPT SAME: FINANCE MA!'. SCR?: MARK DATES ;X1 EYEN? 90% COY?EN?5 .`,R7M ?C Fclder A dC Y.U4!C!°AL 01NAN:: OFF!CE~45 ASSCC. /ACCCL'N?5 PAYpo!c 71/7 V83 76/29/61 PHOYE: 'T'd 3989-'¢6' E%?: 2055 °ERMAYEYT RECORD C?R. T.5?ROY RE?RI EVA! 90X 9DZ NC. !CCA?!ON' Sox C6-199' CA?° S'.Y' 'C: C~/':'/P2 CE/29/6? ?1{ !d-73-72 : 75-'99' FRCP' R0.4SE: C i0 RANGE: E Folder A ' f!!!NG FOR '.983-Ad 0'/7!/83 76/29/8/ (alder i 2 C M!SCELLAYE7L'S 7r/6'/63 C6/29/6e Fc?der A ? ; G ENG!4EERING ^'/7!/93 06/29/81 Fclde; A ! C S M F 0 C!iA'JS AFB'? CHAPTER 77/^.'/83 °.5/29/Bl Polde^ A , CAL!FORN IA OEeTA! SERVE LE 017`./83 76/29/8/ Fc!de^ A CA!!FORY!A JO!'ANA! C7!0'/B3 Ofi/29 /84 °clder A ~ Cp!!Po,4.4IA DARKS 6 RECREAi!C.'1 ".~; ".:/63 76/29/81 Fclder A ¢ CA!!AGNAN d COMPAYY ".T/C:/83 C'. /29/Be Fo',der A 9 CENTRAL C!?I ES 51 GN SERVICE !:'./63 C6/29/Bd fo?der A CNAN9ER OF COMMERCE RAYCNO CUCAM09GA C1/::/B3 C6/29/Bd Fclder 1 +' CREYRON CL^.1/93 76/Z9/BI Fo3de^ A NARK CHR!5?OPHER CHEVRCEE' 77/07 /B3 06/29/8d fel der A '? C!?RUS MO?ORS INC. ~ :1/83 76/29/81 fc!de; A !d CI~° REN?A! Ci/7!/83 C6/Z9/8< Folder A IS COCA COLA 901?L ING CO. RANCHO CVCAMONGA :'/;1/93 76/29/8/ Fc',der A !E WCA COEA 9C?L'!NG CC. vgSACENA 7?/;!/¢; 76/29/6< Po'der A n CCMM-SEA EN?ERPRISE5 7U7'/63 76/29/81 Fcl de^ A !B COV(NGTON 6 CRONE C1/E'/B3 75/29/84 Fclder A '9 CUCAMONGA COUN?" NA1ER CI S?R!C? . !^,'/93 ^5/29/81 Folde^ R ZO CUCAMONGA PR!N?INS 01 /7'/A3 C6 /29/8< Fc'.der P 2'. NILLI AN CUiNBER?. !4C. ;+/:'/83 OS /29/84 !older A 22 7 MISCEC'.ANEOUS 77!7!/83 7E/Z9/A< °c'de^ R 2? NAEDE4 DARE MAIM. 0'/:1/93 7fi /29/86 Folder R 2d DA!!Y REPOR? 97/::/63 06/29/8! Folder p 2¢ CESE,R? PAC!v!C CHAR?ER x;'/93 75/Z9/B/ Folder P 2S 0:?CC 7x/7'/63 Ofi/Z9/Be Fclder A ZT C!C?APHONE - ;1/83 76/29/81 Fc17er A 2¢ GAYLE OMORAN '7'!83 C6/29/6l folder A Z9 DIANE DYAN C'/7'/83 76/29/81 ~ Date: 7E ARTNEN' HEAD 7e:e: .SS?. C ~'° C.^.Y OF 4A9CHC CL'CAMONGA Ces:ruttier. Nc:iticaac^. Recr7 PAGE: 1? 7A?E: 07/03/9` ?IM°: !,:02:22: ?H° cCLLCW!Y. 4°^0 E ARE SCHEDU!EO FOR CES?RL'C?ION. PLEASE 1NC!CA?E ?HE 7ES!REC CIS ITICN, SIGN ANO RETURN TC ?HE RECORDS MANAGEME9? DIVISION. HE RECORDS LIS?ED BELOM MAY ALL 9: OESTROYc.O. X 3E?AIN ?HOSE RECORDS MARK KITH AN % FOR !ION?HS, 7E5TRO° 'HE RES?. 9!LL ?C: d!5'. RECORCS COOACINA?OR: Neely Scsac OED? : 1!5! DEP? NAME: FINANCE MAIL SORT: MARK 0A?ES (%j EVEN? BOM CON?EN?S cROM TO °o'. der A 3: °_ M!SCELLA4'_pJS °c'.der A 31 HARRY EMPEY Fcl de^ A 31 THE EMPIRE CC. Felder # 33 KEVIN EVANS Fa3de^ P 3/ EMP!OYM'.N? DEVELOPMEYc OEo?. Folder A 35 E!EC?IDN E%DE.YSE. 3SGc.5 '?C. ~~~^_OUNTS PAYABLE 01/01/83 06/29/86 F.40M RANGE: M0. Po'. der P SHARON X!!NE, PBrrv CASH. Folder # 2 SXARON M!!NE, COffEE FUND °:'ce^ P i° O~ MONTCLAL9 Fc'.der A d kU!?! COPY SYS?EMS 'o:]e- A E NCN!CIPAL F!NANC°_ CFc!CERS ASSOC. Folder A 5 4A?!ONAL LEAGUE CF :!^. ES °o'.der A 7 N M!SCE.LANEOC'S °older P 8 X81 Polder P 9 NEMAX, !NC. Folder A !0 C M!SCELLANEp3G Fc'.de- A 1'. ONE HpJR PH0T0 LAB Folder A !1 ON?ARIL. C!?Y OF ce lde- A !3 OXEN EL EC?AIL Fotde^ A !d P MISCELLANEOUS Fc'.de° P '9 PACIFIC COMPU?ER SCPe!v `c'rier 4 !6 PACIFIC ROCK 6 GRAVE: F'. de• A 11 PAC!F IC STRIPING °o'.der A !8 PATrON SALES CORP. °o!der P 19 PITNEY BONES Folder A 20 POMA OIS?RIBU?I NG CO. Fa 3der P 1' PREC!5!On HYORAL'L IC SYSEM Fo'.de^ P 22 PRIDE CCLOR PRESE polder A 13 PRIM?ING SER/RECORDS MAHAGEMEN* Fol PHONE: ;7'.!;989-!86! E%?: 2055 ~ERMANBN? RECORC C?R. CES?ROY RE?RIEVAL 90% 9C% N0. !CCA?!ON Bcx OE-'99! OA?E SEN? ?C: C1/^'/8? 06/29/8! ^1/7'/83 05/19/88 C1/7'J83 ^.5/19/8! ".7/".'/93 75/29/86 77/0!/83 06R9/Bd :?/9!/93 06/19/86 215 1d-73-0! Cfi-!99! ?D RANGE: RA 07/0!/83 Cfi/29/86 77/0'. /B3 06/29/81 77/0!/8? 06/29/81 77/7!/83 ^.6/29/86 C7/C!/83 OE/29/8< 71/O1 /83 76/19/86 :1/7!/83 06/29/8< 01/7'/83 CS/29/BI C7/C!/83 CS/19/B< 77/7'/83 06/29/8/ C1/7!/83 05/29/81 77/71/83 O6/29/8d 77/:'/83 C5/29/Bd ^.1/C!/B3 76/29/81 71/01 /83 C6/29/A! 07/7:/83 05/19/8/ ^.1/:'/83 76/19/8! 71/;!/83 76/19/81 77/:'/83 Ofi /29/e< 97/7!/83 Cfi/29/81 77/7!/83 06/19/8! ;1/7!/83 05/19/81 01/71/83 D6/29/81 der P 11 PROGRESS 8L'LLE?!N RE'!9c,YENi SYS?EM C1/^.! 8 76/19/81 , / ~'~ -~ -- ---------! ~~lzy~Y~ ----- -------- ---~ Cete: A TMEN? HEAD late: AGS?. C.?Y A'?0 . ::TY Cf AANCHC CC'CAXAN6A 7estructic.^. Not?ficet?on RePOrt PAGE: 10 7A7E: 77/03/9! ?IME: !8:02:250 ?HE FOLLOXING RECCRCS ARE SCNEOL'!EC FOR DESTRUC?IOk. PLEASE INCICA?E ?HE DESIREC T.SPO ION, S1GY 840 RE?URN ?0 ?NE RECORDS MANA6EMEN? DIVISION. % E kECOR05 L'.5?EO BELOX MAY ALL DE OESTROYEC. %_ RETAIN THOSE RECORDA MARK NI7N AN X FOR XON?N5. DES?ROY ?HE R`_5?. BILL i0: 6!51 RECORCS COOROINAiOR: Neely Suser. CEP? : t!5! OEP? NAME: flNANCE NA1! SC~4?: NAAN DATE5 %! EVEN? 90% CDN?EN?S fROM ?0 Fclder R 25 folder A 26 Fc!de^ A 27 Fclder A 29 Fclder A 29 Po!Cer D 30 Fclder A ?', `c'.der A ?2 Folder A 33 Fo!Cer A 34 Fc?der A 3`. ~cc/: Cofer p ?< ',]~c /ACCOL'4?S PAYAB!E PL'8L!C EXP:OYEES C N!SCE! LANEWS R NISCELLA4ECL'S RECREA?!ON REFUNDS CIi`! OF RA4CHC CUCAMOYGA RANCHO C7CAMON6A EMPl0YEE5 AC?IV1T!ES FUND RANCHO CUCANOXGA RCA ~4ANCH0 CISPOSAL SEAYICE RANCXC MED!CA! CL!N!C AAPIC 7818, INC. flAl'!'S ?IRE REPAIR PHONE: !7!;!989-!85! E%T: 2756 P'.RX,ANEN? RECORD C?R. D`.S?~40Y RE'RIEVAL 90% 80% N0. LOCA?!04 9cx O6-!99! DA?E 9EN* ?C: 01/7!/83 ^-E/29/A< 77/0!/93 75/29/81 0710!/83 CE/29/e< :7/01/83 05/29/81 0710!/83 06/19/81 C7/^.!/83 05/29/81 C7/^^-!/83 76/29/81 ^.7/01/83 76/29/81 07/0!/83 06/29/86 07/0!/83 C5/29/Bl ^7/0'/83 06/29/81 ^.7/0!/83 05/29/8/ 01/0!/8? 05/29/81 2!9 !/-C3-7' 4 nc-~go~ `40M RANGE: SCE Folder a SAM SPAGNOLA F older A 2 50'JTNERN CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAIXi. Folder R ? SOU?XEAN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ON?AA1C Fo!Cer A t SOU?H`-RN CA!IFORN IA 685 CO. Fc',der d E SPA~RN!E?TS Fo'.Cer A E SATE COMP INS FOND `o!de^ A 1 STAT IOXERS CORP. Fclder A e ROGER? SULLIVAN, P.E. fc'.der A 9 SUN iELEGRA4 F lder A !C EURVEYORS SERVICE Fc 1Ce^ A ?AX °c'.Cer A !2 ^.?LE L45 6 ?RUS? CO. Folder A !3 TORO PAC [f IC 0!S?RIBU?!NG Fclder A ld *!NO ?O4RE2 Polder R 'E DEP? Os ?RA95POA?A?105 Folder A !5 *RANS XES1 FORC ?RUCK Fc!cer A !~ tURNERS IAC. `c!Cer A 18 J MISCELLANEOUS r Ni ^e:e: 7 X N? XEAD Date: 'C RANGE: 2 ^-1/71/83 ^.5/29/Ad 07/01/83 06/29/84 77/0'/83 C6/29/8t 77M.!/83 76/29/81 C7/C 1/83 76 /29/B< 77/01/83 06/29/84 C7/C!/8? 06/29/84 e.7/^.!/93 75/29/81 07/7!/83 C6/P9/Bl 01/01/83 76/29/81 ".7/7!/83 Cfi/29/86 07/0!/83 05/29/8/ 07/0!/83 06/29/81 71/7!/83 06/29/81 07/7!/83 06/29/84 7110 1/B3 76/29/81 01/0!/83 06/29/81 C7/01/83 06/29/81 855?. CCY IW9RNEY C!iY OE RANCHO CUCAMOX6A Des:ruc:ico No:?fi ca;ion Rexr; PAGE: 25 DATE: 07/03/91 TIME: !0:02:290 THE FOLLOXING RECD PRE SCHEWLED FOR OES?RJCTIOM. PLEASE iN0!CA?E ?!!E DESIRED 015 7?Iql. SIGN AXD RETURN TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OIV!SIOX. % HE RECORDS LISTED BELgI MY ALL SE DESTROYEC. % RETAIN ?HOSE RECORDS MARK N!TN AN % FOR MONTHS, DESTROY THE RE5T. 8I'.'- iC: d!5! RECORC5 COORDINATOR: Nee'.y Sasan DEPT : 1151 DEDT MANE: f19ANCE MARK DA1E5 (%) EVEN? BO% CONTEX?5 FROM TO MAIL SORT: ?NONE: !7!4;9¢9-!85'. E%?: 205E Fc?der 7 !9 UNITED EOL'IPMENT CC. Fo',de^ A 20 'JX!V. OF CAL IfORN IA REGENTS IRVINE Fo?de^ A 2! UNIV. OF CALI FORNU UGLA EX?EXS(ON L.A Fc?der A 21 CITY OF UPLAND Fo'.der A 23 THE URRAX LARD INS? Fo?der A 21 ^uEORGE URENA Fcltler A 26 L'.5. POSTMASTER Folder 1 16 V MISCELIAXEWS Folder P 27 M?CNAEL VA!RTR Folder t 28 X MISCFLlAXE0U5 Fo?der A 19 CAR:. XARREN 6 CO. Fo'.der t 30 LAUREN XASSFRMAN Fc?der A 3! NE'.LS FARGO TM'STEE Po!Cer A 32 NEST ENO UNITED XAY Fcltler A 33 XES? P'BL!SH!Nrv CC. Fc?der A 3/ XESTEAN HIGNXAY PROWCiS polder A 35 XESTERN IRRIGATION Folder A 36 XESTERN GOV. RESEARCH ASSOC. `older A 37 MARY IWfTNEY 'older A 36 XI LCOCX AATIERY CO. Fo?der A 39 THOMAS N!CeVM Folder A 10 MILLDAM 6 ASSOC. Fa?de^ A /+ HI LL IAMSON 6 SCNMID Folder A 12 0. XILLIAMS DRINi1NG Fo?der A 13 NOLFE 6 60X5 SALES CC. Fo?der A AA %ERO% CORPORA?ICN Folder A 15 Y MISCELLANEOUS 'older A 16 YU%ON DISPOSAL SERVICE Folder A I1 Z MISCEUAAECL'S Fcldar A d6 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 07/0!/83 01/0!/63 C7/CI/83 07/0!/83 01/0!/83 77/0:/83 G7/0!/83 07/0!/83 D7/C1/83 07/C 1/83 07/0!/83 01/0!/83 07/0!/83 07!0'./83 Dv7ve3 07/0!/83 07/0!/83 77/C'. /93 01/0!/83 ^.7/0!/83 07/C 1 /B3 01/71/83 C7/C'./83 07/0!/83 C7/7!/B3 07/^.!/83 07/7!/83 C7/C!/83 ~~ ~/ 07/0!/83 1~/ H":( COON?5 PAYABLE ^•?/01/83 06/29/81 230 PERMANENT RECCRO DTR. 7ESTAOY RETRIEVAL 9O% 00% NO. LOCA?ION Bax O6-!99: DATE SEX? ?C: Ofi/29//< 06/29/¢1 CE /29/¢e 76/29/8! 06/29/¢! 76/29/81 06/29/81 76/29/81 O6/29/8t 76/29/¢1 06/29/61 06/29/¢1 06/29/8/ 06/29/81 O6/29/8< ^6/29/91 06/29/8! 76/29/9t O6/29/8l 06/29/91 06/29/81 06/29/81 Ofi/29/8t 05/29/81 O6/29/B< 7fi /29/8/ 05/29/8/ 76/29/61 C6/29/8< 06/29/¢1 I1-02-02 ! O6-!99! FROM RANGE: G TO RANGE: X i~ ~Ol-~~ ..2~------; ,iki~ -- ---- --------- -- late: GE MEN? HEAG Dete: ASST. C Y A?TORN r.!?Y Of RANCHC CL'CAM046A Oesvuc:Tor. Noti'•.cation Reocr: ^AGE: ?5 GATE: 01/03/9' r!ME: !0:02:33." ?NE FOLLOMING AECOROS AAE GCHEOL'LE0 FOR OESiR'JC?!ON. PEASE !NOT CA': rH~ 0E51 R:0 D:S~`P, OX. 5164 ANO RErOR~y r0 ?HE AECOROS MANAGEMEV' DIVISION. %"FNE RECORDS !:SiEC RE!OM NAy AIL 9_ 9E5?ROYE9. %__REIAIN THOSE AECORD5 MARX N1 iH AN % FO9__ MON?H5, DES?ROY P.!E .RES?. A:0. i0: /!5! RECORDS COORDINAiDR: Nee?y Sasar 9EP? : /1S! 0EP? NAME; °INANCE MAL 50R?: PNCME: !1!/;989-!85! EX1: 2^.SS MARX OA?E5 aE,RMANENT REC0R0 C'A. 0E5?ROY REIRI EVAL 90X (%; EVENT. 80% CONTENTS FROM 10 90X NO. !OCA?ION Sax 06-199: DA?E 5EN' '.O: Fclder A ' ° MISCELLANEOUS 07/^.!/A? ^.5/29/Be c'der A 2 F6E CHECX PRO?EC?OR 07/0!/83 06/29/81 folder A 3 FMC 00.4°. ^i/C!/A3 06/29/81 'older A d fEOERAL EXPRESS CORP. 07/0!/83 06/29/81 folder R FENCE CRAP` Of L'PLANO C7/CI/83 DS/29/8! Fo',der A 5 f:RSi AM. ?aLE :NS. CO. 97/^.!/8? 06/29/81 Folder A 7 fONTANA PAVING INC. C1/O1/A3 06/29/81 h',der A 8 FOC?H: L::ADEPE4DE4? 4ANX 07/01/83 06/29/81 folder A 9 f00THZLL IAXNMOXEA SERVICE 01/0'./83 CE/29/8! FD?der A !C JAMES FROST CI/C'./83 06/Z9/Bd folder A !' G MISCF_LAN:OU5 07/0!/83 06/29/8! folder A !2 GENEAA! B1NOING CO. C7/C ^. /83 96/79/84 Fc'. tler A !: GENERA: ELEC?RIC 07/0!/63 05/29/8! Fc'. der p 1d GENERAL SERVICES PURL. 07/^.1/83 :5/29/84 fol de: F !: GOLDEN STA?E FAS?E4E~R6 07/0!/83 O6/29/8< Pol tler q !6 GOLDEN 51ATE P:ANi f000 ."1/^.!/83 05/29/81 Folder A " ~4ZCN GOMEZ 07/0!/83 OE/Z9/Bt folder A !6 GOAOON'S !NC. ".1/0!/8? 06/29/81 Fclder A !9 JFRRY GRANT 07/01/83 06/29/8! folder A 20 GENERAL TELEPHONE 01/0!/83 06/29/81 Fclder A 2' GLENDALE FECERA! SAVZX35 07/0!183 06/29/84 Folde^ A 7Z GUY'S 5 GALS NORM .'DG'S 07/01/83 06/79/81 Po'.der A 23 M M!SCELLANE0U9 C7/01/83 06/29/8! Fo'.der A 2d HAR80R ADMIN!S?RA?ORS. INC. 01/".1/83 05/29/86 Fc!de^ A 25 HAANER E001PMEN? CO. 01/0!!83 06/29/8! Po'der 9 26 NARTE-MANKS OIREC? MKTG. 01/01/83 06/29/81 Folder ¢ 27 GARY HAYES NELO: NG ^i/C;/A3 O6/29/Bt =c'der A 29 HIGHNAY SIGN 6 SDDP!Y 0?/0!/83 06/29/91 Fclder F 29 XR!IAM NOL:EY 07/01/83 06/29/81 folder A 38 NILLIAM VOLLEY. PE??Y CASH 07/0'/83 06/29/81 °o lde^ R 3' HOMERS ?fl EE Y'RGERY ^.1/0!/83 06/29/66 folder A 32 S.M. HCY' !OMBER CC. :7/0!/83 06/29/81 Folder A 33 LLOYC HU996 07/0!/9? 06/29/8! °o lder A 3d °YA?? OEL MON?'.. MCN?EREY, CA 07/01/83 06/29/81 Fa lder R 35 HOLLfOAY ROCX CO. ^,7/0!/83 OE/29/B! // //// // I~l_ 4/~~ c- ~_~___~ yy // ,' ~~-~F ~~~L~f~~_ ___ - Oate: ~M D EN 4EA atA: 55'. CI855'. tt A?~ RN° CITY OF RANCRO COCAl10NGA Oes:rcc^,ion 4c:"!:a'1 c^. Re P: r` PAGE: 27 7A?E: 07/03/91 ?IME: 1^:02:360 ?HE FCLLOX!NG RECORCS ARE SCHEDJLEC PoR CE5?AUCTION. PLEASE !90:08?E ?HE DESIRED O!SPOSITION. SIGN ANC RET. L'RN ?C ?4E RECORDS MANAGEI!E4? CIV:S:ON. % ?HE AECORCS LISTED BELON MAY ALL BE OESTROYEC. X RE?A!N ?HCSE RECORC$ MARK XITP. AN % PoR MONTHS. CES?ROY THE RES?. B[LL ?0: l!5! RECORCS COORCINA?OR: Neely Suser 7EP? : 1!51 OEP? NAME: f!NAYCE MA'.'- SCR?: MAR% (k, EV'.NT 9Cx CON?EN?5 ?4 ~000'JN?S DAYABLc ___. DA?ES FROM ?0 PHONE: !1117909-'.BS'. E%?: 205'. oEAMANENT RECORD C?R. OES?RCY RETRIEVAL BD% BO% NC. LOCATION Sox OE-'.99' OA?' SEN' T0; C7/0 U03 05/29/02 230 :2-C1-0'. 3 C',-!94' 'ROM AANGE: AE `C RANGE: BCE Folder A I A.M. REI TER OEV'_LCO!!EY' 77/0?/03 06/29/0! Folder q 1 RESCOE RCO?ER Oi /0!/83 76/29/0! fo'.der A ? JA4!CE AEYNCL7S Ci/0!/03 06/29/B< Polder A 1 A!T1 CAMEAA CEA?ER 01/0!/83 06/29/01 Folder A 5 RIVERSICE CONSTRUCTION 07/0'/03 C6/29/0< folder A 5 ROGER? RI120 97/0!/83 76/29/81 Fclder p 1 JAMES ROBINSON 07/01/83 06/19/0< ~d.der A B 5 M!SCELLANEOC'S 07/0!/03 CS/29/Bd elder A 9 SCAG 07/9 VB3 C6 /29/02 Faller A 1C SAFE?Y S?A!DI9G SERVICE 01/^.1/03 75/29/04 °c'der A !1 BAN BERNARO!4C ASSOC. GOV'? C7/C'. /03 06/25/02 Polder 9 !1 SAN BERNARD LNC COUNTY CLEPN OF ?HE 90ARC 07/71/03 O6/29/0d Fclder A 13 BAN BERNAROI40 CWN?° EMPLOYEES CREO!? UNION 07/9!/03 Ofi/29/eb Polder A 11 SAN BERNARDINO COUN?Y FLOOD CON?ROL 07/0!/03 05/29/96 Folder A 1'. SAN BEANAAO!NC COUN7Y LAIC MGM?. OEVF OPMEN? 07/0!/83 06/29/01 folder A !6 5AN OEANAR0I NC CWN7Y PROBAitON ACC?'G DIV. C7/C'./B3 06/29/01 Fclder A 11 5AN BERNAR71N0 COON?Y SHERIFFS CED?. C7/CI/83 O6/29/Bl Polder A 1B SAN BERNARO:NC COON?Y BCLID XASTE MGM?, 77/0!/83 C5/29/BI Folder A '.9 5AN BERNARD!NO CWNTY S'JRYEYOR 07/01/83 O6/29/0d Fo'.der A 10 SAN BERNAROINO CWNTY ?RANSPORTAIION 01/0'/83 76/19/01 Polder p 21 SAN CIEGC 90?ARY BROOM CC. 07/01 /A3 06/29/01 Polder A 22 SCIENCE OYNAM!CB CORP, 07/OI/B3 06/29/01 Fa?der A 23 JUDY SEMPLS C7/0'/03 06/29/01 'older A 21 SEVEN OAY AL'TC PAR?B 07/01/03 06/19/06 Folder A 2S SHIPLE° PHOTOGRAPH ICS 07/0!/63 06/29/02 Folder A 26 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE :1/0!/03 96/29/81 folder t 17 SMALL JACK 07/0'/03 O6 /29/84 `c?der A 1A BOU?HERN CAL :fORNIp EOISON CO. 0i /01/83 76/19/81 '("~ ACCOUN?B PAYA9LE C1/0!/0 /~l8/Y'~ - ~>~1--------' Caee: DEPARTMENT MEAC 3 O6/29/0t 24! t/-02-0! 6 C6-!99' Oa:e: BS?-- iv prr- v---'~ C:?Y CF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA Oestruclia~ Nc;i'ication Report PAGE: 20 OA?E: O7/C3/9'. 1HE FOLLONIMG REC RDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR DESTAUC?ION. PLEASE INDICA?E ?ME CESIRED D!S ITION. SIGN AND RETURN TO ?HE RECOR75 MA4AGEMEN? 0!4'.5!0X. % ` RECORDS L'S?ED RELOX MAY AU- DE 7E5?ROYEC. X RElA1N ?NOSE RECORDS MARK NI?A A4 X FOR MONTHS. DESTROY THE RES? BILL TC: 1!5! RECORDS CDOROINATOR: Neely Susar. CEP? :4151 DEPT NAME: FINANCE MAP SCR?: MARK CA?ES (%1 EVENT 90% CCN?EN?S FROM .,, P4CNE: (71/)989-185! EX?: 475`. PERMANENT RECORC CTR. 7ESTAOY RE?RI EVAL 90% 97X NC. LOCA'ION Acx 0E-!99! DA?' SEX? ?0: FAON RANGE: 1 ?: RANGE: 9 Folder A A MIGCELLANEWS 97!01 /03 06/19/01 folder A 4 AA Ep'IPMEN? RENTALS C7/C!/83 06/29/01 Fcl"der A 3 A-!ABLE LOCK 6 KEY 77/^.!!83 06/29/04 Folder A / A 6 A ?IRE SERVICE 07/0!/03 O6/29/8< Folder A S A-1 LINEN 77/0!/93 76/29/01 Folder A 5 A:?I0N ?RAVEL AGENCY 07/0'./83 06/29,/0! Folder A 7 AGRICULTURAL COMMISSION C7/C'./03 05/29/01 Folder P e ALXAMBRA FWNDRY CO, Ci/C'/8? 05/29/84 foltler A 9 !LTA FIAE EW IPMENT CO. 07/01/03 06/49/81 Folder p IC !LTA RAXCHC GLASS 6 MI R.40R Ci/0!/83 05/29/84 'older 4 !! AM 19?': -BRUNIG DIV. 01/0!/03 06/29/81 `elder A 12 AMERICAN DLANNINC ASSOC. XA5H INGTp.I 07/0!/83 06/29/01 Fsl der A '3 AMERICAN P!ANN ING ASSOG. CHICAGO 77/7!/93 :5/29/94 Folder A !d AMEA!CAN SOCIETY PUBLIC A7MIN ISTAA?!OX C7/C!/83 Ofi/49/e! Fcl der R 19 ARAOR NURSERY INC. 77/7!/83 75/49/81 Felder A !6 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS C7/C!/83 06/29/84 Folder t 17 A?CHISON. iOPEXA. SANTE fE RAI LAOAD T/7!/83 06/29/00 Po1 de^ A !8 AUTHELE? BEVERLY C7/C!/83 06/29/01 Fo'.der A 19 B MISCELLANEOUS 77/01/83 75/29/01 Folder t 20 BANX OF AMERICA C7/C!/03 CS/29/8/ Folder A 2! 9ANK OF AMERICA, 9? 6 SA 77/0!/03 76/29/81 Folder p 22 A fi X ELECTRIC C1/C!/03 05/29/B4 Folder A 23 BASEL I9E HAROXARE 07/01/03 06/49/81 Folder 0 2/ BEAR GULCH iIAE SERVICE OEANG 07/0!/03 06/29/8< Folder A 25 BECKLEY-LARDY CO. 07/01/83 06/29/81 Folder A 2fi AEEOLE ??M 01/^.1/83 06/49/Ad Folder A 47 BENEF!ELD. KINGSLEY 77/0!/83 06/49/81 Falde^ P 20 BEN2 ENG IN`-EKING 07/71/8? 05/49/81 Polder p 29 BEST OFFICE SUPP!IES 77/0!/83 ^6/29/81 folder P 7C 9:SHDe COMPANY 07/0!/03 06/29/84 Folder A 31 !LANE, MOFFI TT 6 TONNE 07/01 /03 06/29(91 folder A 12 CLAAN 90ARDMAN CO. 01/0' 83 CE/29/81 Deer. DFPAATMENT M Oaee: SS?. CITY A?~ ., C!TY OF RA4CH0 CUCAl10HGA Oestrutti to Not i'iCatia.^. Re,~or: PAGE: 29 DATE C1/C3/9! TIME: !C:O2://0 ?HE FOLLONING RECORDS ARE SCREO'JLED PoR DESTRUC?lOfl. PLEASE INO?CAi'. THE DESIRED 715P ITION. SIG9 AXD RETURN TO THE RECCRDS MANAGEMENT DIV!S!ON. N HE RECORDS !lSTEO BELOM MAY ALL 9'. OESTROYEO. %-_,RE?AIM THOSE RECCRDS MARK N1 iN AN X FOR_ _MON?NS. DESTROY ?HE SESi. B!L! T0: 1!5! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Susar. DEP? :1!51 DEP? NAME: fINANCE !TAIL SORT: MARX DATES (%` EVEN' 80% COtl?EN TS FROR i0 folder A 33 BOON PUB:!SNTNG CC. Po'.der A 3/ BRUGGENAN 6 SMITH Folder A 35 CHAR!'.S Bd0!'E' Folder q 36 BURN FLOYD fc'.der A 37 BURN ROSEANN Polder A 36 BL'S!NESS RESEARCH Polder A 39 M!5C_!LAHEOUS FOl7ER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE oupNE: !7!!;989-'.951 EXT: 2955 PERNANEN? RECORD CT R. DESTROY RE?RIEVAL 90% BO% N9. !OCA?IOk Sax CE-!991 OATS SENT T0: 07/0'./83 C6/29/Be 77/01/83 76/29/9! 07/0!/63 0fi/29/B< 77/0!/83 :6/29/81 C7/C!/B? OE/29/66 97/71/83 76/29/8/ 07/7:/93 O6/29/6< 07/01/B3 0fi/29/81 255 !1-7!-".! 2 CE-!99! FROM RANGE: I TO RANGE: NIL! Folder q I ! NISCELLANEOL'S ^,1/0!/83 06/29/81 Folder A 2 ICNA. OEF, COMP. 01/0!/93 05/29/8! Feder A 3 JOS iE INBOOEN ;1/0!/83 C6/29/Bd folder A / !9x' 07/0!/63 06/29/81 Folder A 5 INT'! C!iY MGMT. ASSOC. 07/0!/63 ^.5/29/81 Fo'•der A 6 LNGRAM PAPER CI/0!/83 CE/29/B< h!der A 1 !NLANC TRUCK ELECTRIC 77/01/83 p6/29/BI Fo'.der A e IDS SERVICES INC. C7/0!/P3 06/29/81 Fc'.der A 9 !N?". CONF. BLDG. OFF!C IA L$ XHI?TER ;7/0!/63 76/29/81 Folder q IC INT'L COXF. BLDG. OFFICIALS C!TRUS BEL? CHAPTER C7/C!/63 06/29,/8! ~t'.der A II INT'L ?INE RECORDER 07/7'/83 06/29/81 (alder A I2 J N!SCEL!ANEOL'S 07/0!/83 p6/29/6< folder A 13 J.M. CONCRETE 77/0!/83 06/29/6! Folder R 11 CR JAESCNNE INC. 07/01/83 01/29/6! °older t !5 JERSEY INTERNATIONAL GROUP 07/0!/83 06/29/AI fc!der A Ifi JOBS AVAILABLE 07/0!/63 06/29/8! Fc!der q !7 RONALD JCNNSON 97/0!/63 06/29/61 Folder R IB NA!SER FWNOA?IGN NEA!?N 07/0!/63 O6/29/8< Folder A 19 %lN%OS 07/0 1/8? 06/29/81 Folder R 20 NINA4!S C!UB 0.` RANCHO CUCAMONGA 07/01/83 06/29/81 Folder A 21 NLEEN-LINE CORPORA?ION 77/0 1/B3 06/29/81 fc!der R 22 GINNA NNU!SEN 07/0!/63 C6/29/Bt Folder A 23 DEBB!E NO ' VICH C7/C1/83 06/29/61 Date: EP RiMENT HEAD Oete: ASST. CITY TOR4EY C!?Y CF R.INCHC CL'CAMONGA Des:roc:ion NoaHpa;!ar. Rep.:; PAGE: 3C 7A?E: 07/03/9! n yc, !n: C2:/8C iNE FOl!gVING R~°>>^~O~RCS ARE SCNEP'JLED FOA DESTA'JCTIOX. v!EAS_ :N9:CA?? iNE DESIRED DI5PO5Ii:ON. 516N AND RETURN TO TXE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION. % H° RECORDS L!S?EC 9ELOW MAY ALL BE DE5TRJYED. % RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARK KITH AN % FOR MON?N5, OES?g0Y THE RE5?. RILL i0: /!5! RECORDS COOROIXA?OR: Neely Susar. DEDT :1151 7EP? NAME: FINANCE MA!! SOR?: oNONE: 1711)989-!85! EN?: 2055 MARK CA?E5 (X1 EVEN? 9C% COR?cry?S °POM Folder A 2< 0?i0 NROU?!'. Fp'der A 26 .'CAN NRUSE Folder R 2E MARS NUHN Po?der A 27 LA BELLE CCNSUITANTS Folder A 20 JAC3 LAN fo'.der A 29 LANCE, $Ol'. 6 LUNGNARO Folder A 30 LANSON PR07L'C?S !NC. °alder A 3. _EAGUE OF CALIFORNU C;?IES SACRAMENTO Fo?der A 32 LEAGUE OF CALIfORN IA CI^ES C!?A'JS BEL? C:V, Po'.der A 33 LINVIIIE-SANOERSON-HORN Fc!de^ R 3d L!9RARY OF URBAR AFFAIRS °o?der A 35 SALLY LOGUE folder A 36 LOS ANGELES TIMES, L.A. fc?der - 37 LOXES POKER TOOLS Po?der A 35 909 LL'DXIG Fader 0. ?9 MC MISCELLANEWS Po?der - c; BARBARA MCGOXAR Folder A a! AOBER? MCNAUGHAN folder R AZ M.M.A. S.C. MEAIBERSNIPS Po!de^ R d3 NARTLN 6 CNAPMAN Fclde^ R Id KAREN MAICHAM Fo?der A dE MIJAC EN?ERPA!SES, INC. Po1 der A /6 JON D. MINELS Folder A /7 H MISCELLANEOUS PERMAN'-NT RECORD CiR. DESTROY RE?R!EVAL 80% 90% N0. !OCR?!ON Box 05-!99! DA?E 5EN? ?C: 01/0'/83 06/29/A< ".7/C!/03 :5/29/8/ 07/C!/B3 O6/29/8< C1/C!/83 06/29/81 CI/C!/83 O6/29/ed C?/C!/83 76/29/81 7717!/83 06129/8! ^-1/7!/83 05/29/84 C7/C!/83 O6/29/8< C7/^.+/B3 06/29/81 07/0!/83 06/29/8! 77/0?/83 06/19/81 7717!/83 O6M9/8! 07 /C!/83 :6/29/8! Ci/C!/A3 O6/29/e< 07/0'/83 C6/29/BI 77/01/83 C6/29/Bt 07/01/03 06/29/81 Ci/01/83 76129/8/ ;7/01/83 76/29/81 ^-7/0!/83 06/29/8! ^7/71/83 ^.6/29/84 C7/C!/83 C6/29/Bd 77/^.!/83 06/29/81 d; 0 9UOGET XORCING RAPERS 0!/7!/8'- !2/29/86 "" MELD '" !!3 12-C3-02 + !2-!989 Po?der A 6C'CGE* PREDARA?!ON 9CCN FOR !9B'.-BE :!/C'./8E 12/29/86 'fO 9UOGE' HORNING PAPERS 7!171/85 !2/29/97 *' NELC '" !IE !2-73-72 6 !2-!997 i Folder A 1 REVENUES 1986-81 .. /C VAS '2/29/8? late: DEPARTMENT NERD Cate: A C.TY A?? E. CITY Of RANCHO OJCAMON6A Destruction Nat if icatior. Report PA6E: 3! CA?E: 77/03/9! ?IME: !C:C2:5IC TI!'- FOLLOXING RECORBS ARE GCHEpJLEO FOR OES?AUC?ION. PLEASE INDICA'.E ?HE DEEIREO CISDOSI?ION. SI6H ANO RETURN ?0 ?HE RECORDS MAHA6EME9? DIY?510X. % HE RECORDS LIS?EC BELOX MAY ALL BE 7ESTROYEO. %__RETAIX THOSE RECORDS MARK XI?H AN % fOR MON?Y5, DESTROY iXE REST. BILL i0: 1151 RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Susar OEP? /!5! DEP? NAME: FINANCE MAIL SOR?: MARK CA?'.S (%; EYENT BO% CON?EN?S FROM TO folder A 2 FINAL BL'CGE? DOCUMEN?S 1985-8T Feder A 3 9UDGE? PROJEC?ION NOAKSEEi 1!-25-05 FtSder ¢ A BUDGE? PRO.'EC?:ON XOAKSXEE? 3-'-85 ~7 CASH DEMANCS 6 XARRANT9 C1/C!/0/ !2/29/05 Fc?der A ! RINK COP; ES CF NAARAN?S ',~k 0 DA:LY CASP RFC;: P?5 C3/C!/85 71/29/85 O DA^; CASH RECEID?6 OS/0?/05 06/19/0'. D DAILY CASH RECEI DT6 D6/C i/85 09/19/B5 D DAILY CASH RECEIP?5 09/01/05 12/29/05 X D OAI!Y CASX RE^.E!PTS C',/01/0< 12/19/05 ?y( D DAILY CASP RECE!P?S !1/C!/05 03/19/85 PHONE: !7!1;989-+05! E%?: 2055 PEAMANEN? RECORD :?R. 7E5?ROY RE?RI EVAI 90% 90X N0. LOCATION Box 06-!991 DATE SEN1 i0: C1/C!/B6 12/29/0? ----- 71/01/Bfi !2/19/07 C:/0!/96 !2/19/87 !12 !2-03-73 6 12-!990 01/D?/B/ 12/29/85 19! .; C'-C3 ! C1-!990 ?96 13-C1-02 2 06-!99C `95 13.0!-01 '. 09-!990 !9d !3-C!-03 A !2-!99C 2CC 13-C1-01 1 12-1990 !83 !3-02-01 ! C3-!99! / d __ _ _ Data: D ARTMEN? MEAD Date: ASST. CIT `ORNEY CITY Of RANCNC CCCAMON6A Oestructipn Nptifica:Tar. Report PAGE: 32 DATE: C?/73/91 TIME: !C:02:55C iME fOLLOXING RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR OEST9'JC?ION. PLEASE INOICA?E THE DES: RED C:~gPOSI'ION. SIGN ANO RE?URN i0 THE RECORDS MANAGENER? DIY:SION. X *NE RECORDS L'S?ED GELON NAY ALL BE DESTROYED. %_ RETAIN ?HOSE RECCRCS YAA% KITH AN % FOR !ION?H5, DESTROY ?NE RES?. GILL TC: d15! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Xeely Susan 7EP? : d!51 7EP? NAME: FINANCE MAIL SOF .NARK DATES (%) EVEN? BOX CON?EN?5 FROM TC X~ C CA!LY CASH RECEIPTS D3/C!/8E CS/29/86 ~,^ 0 DAILY CASH RECEIPTS 75/C!/86 C6/29/85 -i 0 GAILY CASH RECIIPTS PINK CODIE OI/O1/86 !2/30/87 I C CA I LY CAS!! REC: EPTS DIXA COPIE 0!/7!/88 !2/30/88 -~ O DAILY CASH RELIEDTS PINN COPIE 01/01/89 12/30/89 ~', D °!XEC ASSETS C1/^.'/82 12/29/93 Fplde^ A CI?Y'S F(NANC IAL REDORiS ~t,y6 F:XEO ASSETS 76/01/86 76/29/86 DRONE: !T!A )989-185! EX?: 2055 D'-RMANEN? RECORD CTR. DES?ROY RE?R:EVAL BO% BO% NC. LOCA?!ON 9p% CL-!99' CA?: SENT TC: !19 '.3-02-02 3 C5-!99' !82 13-C2-O2 6 06-!991 Age !1-C2-C! 2 !2-!988 A9'. !!-C2-0! S `2-!989 492 !!-C2-C! 4 !2-!99C 125 !2-C2-C3 2 '.2-!985 C 1 /0!/82 ;2/29/83 12! !2-03-01 3 06-!988 F', der A ! REC'J ISI?IONS !979 75 /C!/86 O6 /29/85 'older A 2 ;NVE4TC4Y 76/C!/G6 06/29/66 `p'aler R J UNIT 11C VIN ICLE MAN?ENANCE !962 05/C!/B6 Ofi/29/G6 Fo'der A 1 UNtt 312 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1982 OS/^.!/B6 06/29/66 fp'.der A '. UN!? 3!3 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1963 O6/01/ 06/29/8fi Date: DEPARTMENT HEAD late; T. G .Y ORNEY Ci?Y OF RANCHO CUCAMOX6A Oeuructix NotificaNar. Report PAGE: 33 7A?E: 07/03/91 TIME: 10:02: SBC ?HE fOLLOXIHG RECORDS ARE SCNEDL'!EO FOR pE57RUCT10N. PLEASE IN71CA?E ?XE OESI REO 0!SPOSI?!ON, 516N ANp RETURN TO ?NE RECORDS NANAGEME9? DIVISION. % THE AECOROS LISTED BElgl MAY All BE pE5TR0YE0. X RETAIN ?HOSE RECORDS MARK XITH AN % FOR MONTHS, DESTROY THE REST. BILL T0: 1!8! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Susar. OEP? : /1St DEPT NAME: FINANCE MAIL SORT: PHONE: ;7!1!909-!851 EXi: 2055 MARK DATES PERMAN EX? RECORD CTR. DESTROY RE?RIEVAL 90% (%' EVEN? 90% CON?EN?S FROM TO BC% N0. ,OCA?!0!1 Bax 06-!991 DA?'. SENT ?O: Fo?der e E UNI? 315 VEHICLE MAIN?ENAXCE !983 06/01/A6 06/29/86 Fo'.der A ".N iT 3!7 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE !983 76/C^. /86 C6/29/86 Fc?der A 8 UNI? 319 VEH IC!E MAIN?ENANCE 1983 06/7!/86 Cfi/29/Bfi Folder A 9 L'N!? 710 VEHICL'- MAINTENANCE !982 C6/C1/B6 76/29/86 Folder A '"- 'JN?' fl'. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE !983 06/0!/86 06/29/86 ~~D fl%EO ASSE?S 76/0'/86 C6l29/A6 :2d !2-03-D1 5 OS-1988 Folder A 1 fIN!5!!ED ?AGGIXG Ofi/C1/B6 05/29/86 folder A 2 V!HIftES ;DEPRECIATION 6 RESERVE SCX7 76/0!/86 06/29/86 Folder A 3 GTE PHONE SYS?EMS !979 06/0!/86 05/29/8fi polder A d GEN'L ?EL. OF CAl!FORNIA !918 C6/01 /86 76/29/86 Fo?der A 5 FOUND PROPERTY A3-BS Ofi/DI/86 06(29/86 fc?der A 5 F!%ED ASSE? PURCHASE ORDERS B!-A2 05/7!/86 06/29/86 polder / 7 ARCH 6 ENGINEER 1918 06/71 /86 Ofi/29/B6 Fo'.der A B PARKING LOi 1978 O6/CI/86 76/29/86 Folder A 9 9ERYL 5?REE? !978 O6/0!/Bfi 06/29/86 Fc?der A !0 ?RAFFIC S!6NAL MAIHT !979 76/0!/86 C6/29/86 polder A '.! SCH00! FEE6 1980 75/0!/86 Dfi/19/06 Fo'.der A !2 SPARN!ETiS MATER 1978 76/0!/86 06/29/86 Folder A !3 POLICE GERICES !918 7fi/CI/Bfi 06/29/86 Folder A 'd OFFICE FI L!HG SYS?EN 'MUFF' 06/01/96 76/29/86 Folder A 15 PLANNERS-BLAYNEY 1918 Ofi/0!/86 C6/29/8fi Folder A 16 HATER OISTRIC? OF S0. CALIF. 7978 76/01/86 06/29/86 Folder A I7 TE%ACO-GAS GARDEN 1979 06/01/B6 06/29/Bfi Folder A f0 GRAYDON MURDHY LEASE 1978 06/01/86 06/29/86 Folder A 19 E%iERXINATOR 06/01/86 D6/29/86 Fc?der A 2C OFFICE MACHINE SERVICE !981 06/C!/86 06/29/86 folder A 2' 0[CTA?fON/?AANSCRIAINO MACHINES !982 OE/7!/86 06/29/86 Folder p 22 ?YPEXR!?ER 1983 06/7!/86 06/29/86 Folder A 23 CALCULATORS !982 06/01/86 06/29/86 Fc?der A 21 MAILING MACHINE !981 06/01/86 06/29/86 Po?der A 25 COMW?ER SDED'$ 1981 Ofi/01 /8fi 06/29/Bfi folder A 26 R E9TAL5 !983 76/C! 86 29/86 '~, y p , _- / ~, ~/, Or l ~--- l ~ ----- -- ^----°--- Uetr. I pEPA MENi HEAD Date: ASST. CIT ATTORNE Y C!iY CF RANCHO CUCAMON6A Destruofian Nc!iEicatian Repor: PAGE: 31 7ATE: 07/03/91 THE FO!!ON1NG RECORDS ARE SCNED'JLED FOR OESTAUr.?EON. PEASE INOICA?E ?NE DESIRED CIEP051710N, SIGN AND RETURN iC THE RECORDS NANAGEwcy? DEVESEON. X/*HE RECORDS LISTED BELOX MAY ALL BE OESTAOYED. %__RETAI4 ?HOSE RECORDS MARN XITH AX % FOR-_ XONiMS, DESTROY ?HE RES?. BELL ?O: /!5! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Nee Cy Susaa OEDT : 115! OEP? NAME: FINANCE NAE'_ SCRT: MARN 7A?ES (%) EVEN? BO% CONTENTS FROM TC Folder A 27 COPE ERS !9AC polder A 2B COMM. SERVICES 1978 Folder A 29 FINANCE 1978 Fo'.der A 30 !GENII FE CATION !978 Folder A 3! OTS GRAN' 1980 Folder A 32 ADM1N15?RATIIXI Folder A 33 10 iON JACK E-Ip Folder A 36 SPRAYER 2/-E-0110 Folder A 35 CETY YARD !98C Polder A 36 PURCHASE ORDERS !918-19 d}-C FE%ED A$$ETS Folder A ! COMWTER EQU IPME91 Folder A 2 VEMECLES 'o'iler A 3 ENGIN'.E4ENG Folder P 1 FINANCE 'o'.der A 5 P!ANYENG Folder A 6 PURCHASING Folder A 7 RDA Folder A 8 RESN NANAGEMEN?N Fc'.der P 9 SHER!Ff5 DEP1 Fa+.deF P 10 REi1REMEV?S folder A !! DE!E?10X5 Folder A 12 CORREC?IONS folder A !3 ?RANSFERS Fo'.der A 7/ MESCELLANEOUS folder A !6 !AND !NFO OB/C1/BB 08/29/98 OB/C!/88 08/29/88 CB/^.!/88 08/29/88 78/C!/BB OB/29/88 78/C1/88 08/29/88 CB/C!/88 CB/29/AB 78/7!/88 08/29/88 08/C!/BA 0A/29/AB ^B/:!/B8 OB/29/AB CB/C1/BB 08/29/88 98/C!/BB 08/29/BB CB/C!/8B 08/29/88 :9/71/88 CB/29/BB CA/71/88 C8/29/A8 7B/O7/88 08/29/88 !. '~ FI%EC ASS`?S OB/0'/BA 08/29/88 125 11-02-C3 + OP-'990 Fo'.der A ' ADMIN!$iRA?1 ON-VEHICLES, COMPU?ER EQUIP. 6 EOL'EP. CB/7!/88 78/29/88 Folder A 2 ASSESSMENT REVENUE-COMPU?ER EOUI P., d EQUIPMEN? OB/0!/A8 /29 /BP Date: DEPARTMENT HEAD Dete; S?. C ~,O~4NE° PHONE: (711)989-!BS! E%?: 2D55 PERM/NENT RECCRD C?R. DESTROY RE?RI FVAI BD% BO% N0. LOCA?ION Box O6-!991 GATE S'a'? TO: C5/C!/BE Ofi/29/86 76/7!/86 76/29/86 C6/0!/Bfi 06/19/86 C5/D!/86 06/29/66 C6/C!/86 Ofi/29/65 76/71/85 C6/29/efi O6/D!/A6 C6/29/Bfi 76/01/66 06/29/86 C5/C!/85 76/29/86 7./7!/86 ^6/29/86 08/01 /8B CB/29/AB 122 12-03-C1 / OB-'99C .!?Y OF UXCHC C7CAMONGA Oest rcction Notlf i:a;i on ReDC^: aAGE: 35 CA?E: 71/03/9! ?!ME: !C:03:OSC TX', fOLLOMING RECORDS ARE SCHEOUL'.0 FOR DES?RUCIlOX. PLEASE INO!CA?E ?ME DESIRED DI$POBI iION, SIGN AND RETURN ?0 ?XE RECORDS MANAGEMEN? DIVISION. % HE RECORDS LISTED BE!ON MAY ALL BE DES?gpvcn, X RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARK XI iH AN % FOR MON?M5, DESTROY THE REST. BILL T0; 1!S! RECORDS COOROINA?OR: Neely Susar DEP? :1161 DEPT NAME: FINANCE MAP. SOkT: PHONE: pll )989-'.851 E%?: 2055 XAR% DATES PERMANENT RECORD CTR. OES?R0Y RETRIEVAL BOX (%1 EVENT 90% CCN?EN?S FRO! ~„ 00% NO. LOCH?ION Box 06-1991 DA?'. SEN? T0: Folder II 3 B 6 5- VEHICLES, COMPUTER EOUIPMEN? AND EO!'IPMEN? OB/0'./80 08/29/88 Folder A 1 BUST NE55 IICEe5E5-COMPUTER EW IPMEN? 6 EW!PMEMT OB/01/80 78/29/88 folder A E CI?Y YARD-COYSTRUC?(ON COSTS OB/C!/08 00/29/88 Folder A 6 CI1Y FACII Ii TES-EW IPMENT CB /0!/08 08/29/88 Folder A ' CIVIC CEX?EA-CONSTRUCTION COSTS OB/01/8B 08/29/88 Folder A e COMMUNITY SVCS-EWIPMENI, PARKS, LANG b 9U!LDIXG I OB/01/BB 08/29/88 Folder A 9 EMERGENCY SVCS-EQE'I PMEN? d COMPU?EA EQUI PMEN? OB/0!/80 08/29/88 yrD OPERA?!ON L'.DSER 6 JWANAL D!/0'./T8 !2/29/79 _! 0 PAYROLL CET'C?IONS 6 AO?HOA!ZA CVO!/82 12/29/82 ~D gECAPITULATION OF ADPROPR1AT10 03/01/82 06/19/02 folder A 1 OA1LY REVENUE RE-CAP K; 7 RECAP!?ULAT ION Of APPAOP~R IP?IO :!/C'./01 !2/29/03 7 02-03-02 3 12-1999 F CZ-O3-02 2 !2-198< 202 13-0'.01 1 O6-!981 73/0!/72 06/29/82 179 12-03-03 3 @-1985 Folder A '. OA!LY REVENUE RECAP 01/71/82 !2/29/83 D 0.ECE!PTS. 0?1 L!?!ES PAYMEN?S 9!/D!/eD 11/29/83 !08 !2-03-03 Z 12-1985 Folder t '. RECEI P?5 FOR INACTIVE PJBLIC OEPOS!?S 01/01/80 12/29/03 Folder A 2 RECEI PTS Of INA~CTIVE//PUBLIC DEPOSI iS 01/01/80 12/19/83 Date; D PARTMEXT NEAR Date: A CIi TO Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Destruction Not i'icetion Report PAGE: 36 DATE: 07/03/91 TIME: IC:03: DAC THE FOLLOIIING RECORCS AAE SCHEDULED FOR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE !NO1CA?E THE DESIRED DISPOSITION. SIGN AND RETUR4 TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION. % HE RECORDS LISTED BELOM MAY ALL BE OESTROYEC. %_ RETAIN THOSE RECORDS 51ARN MITH AN % FOR MONTHS, DESTROY THE RES?. 9 :L TC: d!S'. RECORDS COOAOINAiOR: Neely Susan OED? : e!51 DEPT NAME: fiNANCE MAIL SOR NARK DATES (%) EVEN? 80% COYTENTS FROM TO 1~_' RECEIPTS, UTILITIES PAYMENTS 0!/C!/82 !2/29/83 P9pNE: f211 j9B9-1951 '.%T: 2055 PERMANENT RECORB CTR. DESTROY RETR!r--UAL 90% BC% N0. LOCA?ION Bon 06-199! GATE SEN? T0: _____-____'_____________1___________________________ 1C ,2-C3-03 6 2- 985 Folder 1 ! PINK COP: ES Df RECEIPTS ^.1/0!/82 !2/29/83 RfVs.NU'. FILES 07/0!/92 !2/29/82 "• MELD •• !98 '.3-C'-02 { !2-?981 ilk AEVENUE FILES !0/01/80 O//29/Ae •• HE!D "" !23 !2-03-0! 5 Od-1990 folder A ! HANDICAPPED REQUTAMENiS NANOBOON Y-! 10/0!/80 01/29/08 Feder A 1 HANOICADPED REOUIRMENTS MANDBOON V-2 10/0!/80 01/29/88 'older A 3 REVENUE SNARING HANDBOOK !0/0!/80 01/29/BP Fnider t 1 ~9EVENUE SHARING BULLETIN 10-80/d-BB 1D/71/80 ^-1/29/08 Folder A 5 THE REVENUE SHARING AC? 10/01/80 01/29/88 Folder A 6 ~4EVEHUE SNARING !90!-B3 1C/C!/BO 01/29/88 Folder A C PUBLIC PART (C. IN REVENUE SNARING 10/O1/BO 01/29/88 Folder A e AENEXEL LAX FOR REVENUE SHARING !8/01/80 01/29/88 _i 0 TIME CARDS 0!/Ofi/BS 06/23/85 3!T !fi-CZ-03 1 06-1990 Polder A '. 11MECAR05 FOP 1-6-05 0!/06/85 06/23/05 Folder A 2 TIMECARDS FOR 1-20-BE 01 /Ofi/06 06/23/8'. Folder A 3 1IMECARDS FOR 2-3-BS C'/06/05 06/13/05 Polder A l TIMECARDS FOA 2-IT-85 CI/O6/BS 06/23/¢5 Folder A 5 ?IMECAROS FOR 3-3-85 0!/O6/05 06/23/85 'alder A 6 TIMECARDS FOR 3-17-85 O1 /06/85 06/23/85 Folder A 7 ?IMECAROS FOR 3-3!-BS 0'./06/05 06/23/05 Folder t 0 TIMECAROS'fOR bll-BS 01 /C5/05 06/23/05 Folder A 9 11 MECARDS FOR 1-28-05 01/O6/85 06/23/85 Date: DEP ENT HEAD Date: BST. C.1Y 1 NEY CITY OF RANCHO COCAMON6A Destruati oo Notitiaa;Tor Report PAGE: 31 GATE: 07/03/91 TIME: 1C: C3: !!". THE fOLLOMING RECORDS ARE 6CHEOULEO FOR 0ES?RC'CT20N. PLEASE INDICATE THE DESI REC D' PJSI?ION. SIGN AXO RETURN TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION. %,~fHE RECORDS L15TE0 BELON lIAY ALL OE OESTROYEC. %. RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARK XITH AN % fOA-- MONTHS, CESTROY THE REST. RILL T0: 6151 RECORDS COOROINAiOR: Neely Susa.^. DEPT :1151 DEPT NAME: FINANCE !IA I! SOR?: MARN GATES (%) EVENT BO% CONTENTS FROM TO folder A 1C 11MECAAOS FOR 5-12-05 Folder t !1 TIMECARDS FOR 5-26-05 Folder A 12 TIMECARDS 6-9-65 Folder A 13 TI MECAROS FOR 6-23-85 ~- 0 TIME CARDS 01/07/85 Ofi/12/B6 Folder A Folder A Folder A Folder A Folder A Folder A Fal der A Folder A Folder A folder A Folder A Folder p Folder A folder A Folder A Folder A folder A Folder A folder A folder Folder A Folder A Folder 0 Folder A Folder A Folder A TIMECARDS 7-1-05 TIMECARDS FOR 7-2!-85 ?IMECARDS FOR a-1-85 ?IMECARDS FOR O-IB-85 TIMECARDS FOR 9-1-65 TI!ECARDS FOR 9-!5-65 ?IMECARDS FOR 9-29-85 itMECAA05 FOA 10-13-85 TIMECARDS FOR 10-27-BS iIMECAR05 FOR 11-10-85 TIMECARDS FOR 11-21-BS TIMECARDS FOR !2-22-85 TIMECARDS FOR 12-8-85 iIMECAR05 FOR !-5-66 TIMECARDS FOR 1-23-66 TIMECARD9 FOA 2-fi-Bfi TIMECARDS FOR 1-20-86 ?IMECARDS FOR 3-fi-66 TIMECARDS FOR 3-20-06 TIMECARDS FOR 3-30-8fi ?IMECARDS FOR /-13-06 TIMECARDS FOR 1-27-66 ?IMECARDS fOR 5-I1-86 i1MECARCS FOR 5-26-66 TIMECARDS FOR 6-8-06 TIMECARDS~FOR 6-12-66 Dete; DEPARTMENT HEAD PHONE: (7111989-'.851 E%T: 2055 PERMANENT RECORD CTR. DESTROY AEIRI EVAL 80% RO% N0. COCA?[ON Box 06-1991 GATE SENT T0: 01/06/05 06/23/65 C'./O6/BS 06/23/05 0!/D6/85 Ofi/23/85 01/06/65 06/23/65 31fi 16-02-D3 106-199! 07/07/65 07/C7/05 07/01/95 07/01/86 01/07/05 01/07/65 07/07/85 07/07/85 ^.7/01/05 07/07/85 01/07/85 01/01/85 ^^-1l".7/85 C1 /07/8x. 07/07/85 07/01/05 07/07/85 07/01/85 01/07/85 C7/07/BS 07/01/85 07/07/85 07/01/85 Oi/07/85 07/01/85 07/01/85 06/11/86 Ofi/12/BE 06/11/06 06/12/86 O6/22/B6 06/12/Bfi 06/12/86 06/11/86 06/11/06 06/11/06 06/22/86 Ofi/22/86 05/22/66 06/21/8fi 06/21/06 Ofi/11/86 06/21/66 06/12/06 06/21/86 06/21/66 06/12/06 06/12/06 06/22/86 06/22/8fi 06/21/86 06/11/06 ~~~li- - ---~ gip" Dace: A ST. CI,Y A? 90%ES i0 RE DESTROYED 50 --- C1TY' OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICD, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Bob M. Porter, Assistant Engineer r- SUBJECT: AUTHORIIATION 6F TH£ ASSIGNMENT OF AN ADULT CROSSING 6UnRD A7 THE INTERSECTION OF BOUGAINVILLEA COURT AND PEACH PLACE FOR NINORONS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The Public Safety Comaission recoamiends an adult crossing guard at the intersection of 8augalnvillea Court and Peach Place for Nindrows Elementary School. eAClcelaaioiAlw.rsis In October of 1991, the Nindrows PTA presented a letter and petition to the Public Safety Cowaisslon requesting adult crossing guards at Bougainvillea Court and Peach Place, and also at Bougainv111ea Lourt and Victoria Nindrows Loop (North) for Nindrows Elementary School. The Public Safety Coam155fon Instructed staff to investigate the request and report back at the October 1991, Public Safety Commission meeting. Studies were conducted in which pedestrian and vehicular volumes were counted in the morning and afternoon. At the two location, the studies revealed the following: Bougainvillea Court and Peach Placo The number of students 1n the morning was 38 and 1n the afternoon 50 with Sb and 38 vehicles respectively for the same time period. Bougainv111ea Court and Victoria Nindrows Loop (North) The number of students 1n the morning was 14 and 1n the afternoon 28 with 91 and 45 vehicles respectivety for the same time period. Based on these numbers, staff recommended that adult crossing guards not be assigned at these two tocatlons at this time. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CROSSING GUARD AT BOUGAINYILLEA CT. a PEACN PL. November 6, 1991 Page 2 The Public Safety. Commission considered testimony from the Mindrows representatives along with staff lnfornwtion and decided that the safety of the elementary age swdents required that an adult crossing guard be assigned at the Bougainv111.-eayCO~u~rt~and Peach Place crosswalk. Respectfully subm tted, C/ / ~""' Nm. Jce O'Neil City Engineer NJO:BNP:sd Attachment S~ Crossing Guerd Warrant at Uncontrolled Intersection Location: \IiG?DPtALUh~pr.:~~J ~cF(ti `~?~:;=, C School : ~~ I k C20 W S ELF V' E h'" ~X rc -' ~ `-~J ^ ;~ Stan time : 1 ~ 30 To FS '~ 30 Dismissal time: Z',3O To 3:IS Distance from crosswalk to school : i! _ (~EYOUt~ I M ~ ~ ~ 1 F3r:5k+r~ C ~ '~2 •~~ ~~~ i Distance to neatest signal or stop sign : ~~ G','OPS;b ~.t >1T Teo ~~, LET V. U.J.'_F Width of street at crosswalk : '~~ F T Date of study: Hour : No. of pedv trussing Vehicle votunte : 1Hin. vehicle volume ~; 3d -rc D;3o ~ ¢ q 1 12B1o * * The minimum vehicle volume is determined by using the critical volume, as determined by the road classi[acation (As shown on attached graph.) such as Sec. (64') = 69W, Coll. (44') l3,WU and Loc. (36') 18,UW . After determining critical volume, divide number of peds , for otte hour, into the critical volume. (i.e. Road class =local , no. o[ peds = l5 . 18,000 / 15 = 1,2W Miu. vehicle volume = 1,2W ) Pw i~ oo~cza• ro4 The location must meet the warrants stated above for two (2) hours tojustify the installation of a crossing gaurd. Inveslagaled by /~'~« "`V~a ~ C~ Uate °- Approvedby ,L!`,..,ai~„_. llale r~'r'7~_ S~ Grassing Guard Warrant at Uncontrolled Intersection Location: i` ~ <, '[' - `~ f'_'7 ~.-• Stan time : 7 ~ ~D To B' 30 Dismissal time : Z :?O To 3'. I S Dis[ancefmmcrosswalktoschool: K= 11v~~~~_E T;~~ ~I-5 =!t~z.ti~^ . R VIG f ~ W~' iu;~y~~ _, Distance [o nearest signal or stop sign : ZSZ` ~ Ar ~ ~~~ ~ t _ - W idth of sweet at crosswalk : ~ ~ = r Date of study: Q - I ~ "^' ~ dour : No. of pads crossing Vehicle volume : Atin. vehicle volume ~; ~~ To :,~ 3~ 5~ 4~4 z' 3c r0 ~s SD ?S ~ * * The minimum vehicle volume is determined by using the critical volume, as deterrrlined by the road classifacation (As shown on attached graph.) such as Sec. (64') = 6900, Coll. (44') 13,000 and Loc. (36') 18,OW . Attar determining critical volume, divide number of pads ,for one hour, into the critical volume. (i.e. Road class =local , no. of pads = 15 Miu. vehicle volume = 1,2UU ) 18,000 / 15 = 1,2W Aw~ :5,ooo=3S= 414- P v~ .8, oo~ = :a = 3b0 The location must meet the warrants stated above for two (2) hours to justify the installation of a crossing gourd. Inveslagaled by _~~c~... ^Ju--~.~ llale '~ Approved by of nv~ ~..,ti Date '/ ~ --' r ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 - `~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A, Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIECI': Consideration of a Resoluf_on S~ rtinQ a Ballot Measure to RFps~ Booking Fees Authorized 6y~, B 57 The City has been regnested to support a ballot measure to repeal the booking fees being charged by the County of San Bernardino as authorized by SB 2557. Phis measure is being supported by several other cities in the County and our support is also requested. If the Council desires to support this ballot measure then they can adopt the resolution that is attached to indicate their support. Rtes ectfully Submitted, ~Li~""" _ "~ `~ RFSOIIIPION N0. 91-~,y/ Y A RFSOII/FiW OF THE CITY O><AJCII. OF 7441E CITY OF RAtIQD 00071K2!<;A, CALII~YMIA, SOPF04II'II'>G A BpLiAF l1FAS[A2E 70 REPEAL BOC9@!G FEES AOTHQiIZm BY SB 2557 hfi~2FAS, the State Legislature adapted S8 2557 authorizitg camties to enhance their revenue base by diazgirg cities to boric prisoners as well as to administer the collection of pmpel-ly tams; and , the icpositian of bookitg fees have caused a cRalt firiar~cial hardship on the cities of San Bernardino Camty; and 438~RFAS, the f;.v,.,.,;ai hardship of booking fees have caused same cities to wt hack m essential city services and have made it more diffiwlt far local ggver'nment to serve their residents; std SAS, all 22 cities fn San Bernardino panty are aarently engaged in litigation against the County challenging the equity an3 metlwdology used in establishiig the booking fee; a;d F>FiFREas, cities in the county atd aoctss the state have tried to suggest positive alternatives to the situation which nw exists due to the inposition of book&g fees; and WHF1EFhS, effats to resolve this situation have been uneuooeseful and has lead sane cities to release acme individuals arrested fcs minor offenses, who would have been jailed in priar years, rather than increase the oasts --- -= thiouc~ booking fees. NOW, TFiFREFC>i7E, the city Wu~cil of the City of Rarr3n Caaamorga does hereby resolve to join with other cities in San Bernardirq oamty in supportitg a ballot TM°~~+*n to repeal bodciig foes as authorized by SB 2557. ~~` 1 ' p~ ((~O /I,~/ ~ RESOLUT10NN0. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE TO REPEAT. BOOKING FEES AUTHORIZED BY SB 2557 WHEREAS, the State Legislature adopted SB 2557 authorizing counties to enhance their revenue base by charging cities to book prisoners as well as to administer the collection of property taxes; and WHEREAS, the imposition of booking fees have caused a great financial hardship on the cities of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, the financial hazdship of booking fees have caused cities to cut back on essential city services and have made it more difficult for local government to serve their residents; and WHEREAS, all 22 cities in San Bernardino County are currently engaged in litigation against the County challenging the equity and methodology used in establishing the booking fee; and WHEREAS, cities in [he County and across the state have tried to suggest positive alternatives to the situation which now exists due to the imposition of booking fees; and WHEREAS, efforts to resolve this situation have been unsuccessful and has lead some cities to release some individuals arrested for minor offenses, who would have been jailed in prior years, rather than increase the costs assessed through booking fees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby joins with other cities in San Bernardino County in supporting a ballot measure to repeal booking fees as authorized by SB 2557. ~ ' ~1 ~ ,~: ~~~ G`~` ~ - _ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Assoc late Engineer e~3 . SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SUMMARILY VACATE ORCHARD AVENUE FROM TERRA VISTA PARKNAY EAST TO APPROXIMATELY 220 FEET SOUTNNESTERLY REQUESTED BY LEN IS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - APN: 227-151-27 RECOIBENDATION It 1s recawcended that City Council adopt the attached so ut on summarily ordering the vacation of Orchard Avenue from Terra Yista Parkway East to approximately 220 feet southen+esterly as described in Exhibit "A". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 9, 1987, Tract 13303 was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission. This tentative map included the proposed dedication of Orchard Avenue along the southerly tract boundary west of Terra Yt sta Parkway East. A change in the Terra Vista Master Plan has deleted Orchard Avenue from Terra Vista Parkway East t0 Church Street. On February 7, 1990, the C14y Council approved a time extension to the tentative maD• The final map was approved by the Ctty Council on December 5, 1990, and recorded with the dedication of Orchard Avenue. Since the map has recorded, the street needs to be vacated and then dedicated in fee by Lewis Homes to the City for the purpose of constructing the East Greenway Corridor. Lew15 Haines, the developer, has filed an application requesting the vacation of Orchard Avenue. The subject street right-of-way 1s approximately 220 feet long and 96 feet wide and is located west of Terra Yista Parkway East. Lewis Homes will re-dedicate the property in fee for the East Greenway Corridor by a grant deed concurrently with the recordation of the vacation. CITY CODNCIL STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 The application for sunmarily vacation for the subject site has Deen reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 9, 1991, and found to conform to the approved City General Pian and Terra Y1 sta Punned Commini t<y. Respectfully submitted, F Wm. Jce O'Nett ~' City Engineer WJG:JS:jb Attachment: Exhibit "A" -Legal Description Exhibit "B" -Site Map Exhibit "C" -Vicinity Mnp (pC~ ~. q~ - 3~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF ORCHARD AVENUE FROM TERRA VISTA PARKNAY EAST TO APPROxIM11TELY 220 FEET SWTNNESTEIU.Y - APN: 227-151-27 NHE REAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; end NHEREAS, the City Councll found all the evidence submitted that Orchard Avenue from Terra Vista Parkway East to approximately 220 feet southwesterly in the Terra Y1sta Planned Community is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because they have been superseded by relocation. N011, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foilows: SECTION 1: That the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its o er vacating that portion of street on Map V-094 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described fn a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference maAe a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said Orchard- vie from Terra V15ta Parkway East to Approximately 220 feet southwesterly no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~~+, ~o S c X~: o.; " LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 1ME VACATION GP ORCNAAD AVPNUE 1 TNAT PORTION OP ORCHARD AVENUE AS SHONN ON TMCT N0. 13303-7, IN - TNR CITT OP PANCHO COCAMONGII. COUNTT OP SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OP. ~!' CALIFORNIA AS gECOMED TN BOOR 710, PAa69 /0 TNROOQI 13 OP MAPS, !~ IN THE OFFICE OP TlDS COURIT MCORDER OP SAID COVNTT DESCRIBED AS :ili POId.OM9" I ili BEGZMINO AT TN6 CEATRRL2116 INTEIL7RCSION OP PALM 1RA00175 DRIVEI Rl AND TERM VISTA PARRNAT 6ABT A8 SAONN ON 9AID TRACT N0. 13307-7f !I TBENC6 ALONG SAID C6IREALINL 0[ 7RRRA VISTA PARR1017 EASS SO1mII IOi 34 11.18• BAST 159.41 P6CP7 TNERCE LEAVING BAID CENTERLINE 900TIII Il it SP 15.17• NEST 11.00 PERT TO TBR TR a POI OP BNOIIBIINOJ TNaMC6 IYII 500171 SO 45'17• N68T 10.00 lifS~ TO A POINS ON A NONSAMCENT 17j~ CORVE. CONCAVE EOVTNERLT~ 911VIN6 A MDI08 OI 71.00 P6LT• A~ IJ II RADIAL LINE OP BALD CORVE 70 SAID POIR EEARa MORTR SP 15.17• I "~I~''~ E71BT7 TNERC6 IgRTeNEeTERL2 ALONG 6AID CORVE TNlO0IB1 A CEIITRAL Ilil AN1N.t OP 9000'00•" M ARC LENOPN OP 77.10 PERT] 17DSNCE ALONG lilt SAID LIME SOOTX SP 15.17" MtaS 317.15 PEETt TID711C6 NORTE Ifl 35. 1/'Ia' NEBS 96.00 PEES TO TM 800SBEET.P COMER OP tdP 7 OP 19 SAID TIGCT NO. 17307-77 17DSNCa MORTN SN /5'17• tABS 716.15 PEST 2111; TO TM 6J18SERLT COMER OP LOT 6 OP SAID TRACT 110. 17307-77 211 TRNCN BOIRN 35' 11'18• EABS 170.00 FEET TO 7'R TRII PoZ1R or 22 eDaIMINC. PARCSC corruNa tt,111 sgDARe ner, o.1as AcREa 2G~ PMPAMD BP MAI 271 J.A. 176-5108 ; 2fl APRIL 70, 1991 'L!I es/jq 10) qL6 ARO ABSOCIA1RSr IMC. Of TNa INLAND 61~2R6 F~P~y ~'. ~. IVI~ ~7r `~1 ~tl ~~~~ ~~, -:- • ~~ _ jR, ~G't' SVQ 13303-1 `^ :~ v ~_ .i ~ i ` ~~ ~ ~ - X13 c ~ c: i".; ERST GREENWAY ` ~ ` ~ - Y~ CORRIDOR ~' ~, PROPOSED VACATICC: ORCFIARD AVENUE / .~~\\\ N V CITY OF ` slTe raP RANCHO CUCAMONGA E%HIBI: ': ~von~nvo ntvrsiox 1~~ rrW '~ 4 w o~.~ J~ ~~~' mw.w ~wi r~~a is p~° P,~ 1 < ihopr~ Nrb 66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N YIC NITY °:.7 ENGDJEERII~TG DIVISION E%HI21'. "^_" -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: MAyor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY, PARTS I AND II, FOR THE PROPOSED VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTN STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE RECOMIEIDATION: It 1s hereby recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmentai Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Vlnmar Avenue Street Improvement Proiect from Ninth Street t0 the Chaffey Street Alley and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental quality Act. BACK8l0U1D/ANN.YSIS: Th15 report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Vinmar Avenue Street Improvement Protect from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street Alley. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned Improvements. Said protect entails the rehabllitatton and repair of local streets plus the installation of street lights. it 1s the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,~ect will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these Improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, Nm. Joe O'Neil ~~~~~1?/~ City Engineer NJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION ND. V',~ 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION fOR THE PRODOSED VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has revierred all available input concerning the proposed Y1mmar Avenue Street Improvement Protect; and VRIEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial study has keen prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quaitty Act, as amended. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen-faT~Assessment Initial study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Yinmar Avenue Street Improvement Prolect. SECTION 2: The Ctty Clerk is directed to fife a Notice of Exemption pursuant owe CaTifornla Environmental puality Att. -JY' ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) (;enenl Ittfo~tioa 1. Name sad address of developer or pto,)eet sponsor: Lity of Rancho Cucamonna 10$00 Civic Cen[er Drive, Rancho Cucamonva, LA S1 e 2. Address of pto~ect: Vinm r Av n - o h Street to Chaffee Street Allev Assessor's Block add t ! r: Y/A 3. Name, address, and telephone dlaaber of person to be oovtacted cooceroi og th13 ptV,j eCt: Same as above - Contact Henry Piurakoshi (714) 9E9-1962 4. [nd Scats number of the permit application for the project to ~blch this form pertains: N/A 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and fedetal agedCle9: Street closure permit; approval of pro ie C[ b: Litt' Lo until, City of P,ancho Cuc a~~onna 6. Lkistiog zoning district: Residential 7. Proposed use of site (Pro~xt for •ttlch this fotm is filed): eesidentint Street Project beacrlptlee - See Attached 8. SSte siu. 9. Square footage. rv/A 10. Number of fioore of aonetructiae. N/A li. Amount oL otf-atreei pttklmg provided. ++/A 12. Attach plane. 13. Pn~poeed xhedulLng. u/A lA. Associated plv~ect. ;+/n 15. Anticipated inefvmental developaent. r+/A 16. [f [esideot Ll, tot lode the number of units, xhedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rests, tad type at household size etpected, "1 ~ «,.,..,, C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A N/A 17. If c®erc iaL, Sodlcate [he type, whether oelghborhood, city or reglonalLy oriented, square footage of ales area, and loading tacit Rtes. N/A 18. [f industrial, indicate type, estimated ®ployment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. IC institutional, Sndicate the motor tunctlon, estimated employment per shit[, est Smated occupmcy, loading faci11t1es, and ccamuni ty 6eneflts to be derived tram the protect. N/A 20. If the protect Involves a variance, conditlooal use or rezoning applica- tion, state this and indicate clearly why the applicatlos la required. Are the tot loading Ltaos appl Lcable to the protect or Sta effects? Discuss below all iteav checlted y® (attach additional sheets v necessary). Tea Ro 21. Clunge in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, % or hills, or substantial alientlon of gtoumd contours. - - 22. Change Ln scenic views or v1stL9 trcm existing resident Lal x areas or public lands or tads, - - 23. Change Sn pattern, scale or chlracter of general area of x protect. - - 24. SLgnif Lcent amounts of solid waste or litter. x 25. CTtatige Ln dust, ash, s®ke, fumes or odors in vicinity. x 26. Qiange !o ocean, bay, later, stream or groom aster qualitp or r quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. - - 7.7. Suhstaot Lal change in existing noise or vibntlae levels Ln the vicinity. x - - 28. Site oo filled load or on slope of 10 percent or more. a 29. Use of dispaeoll of potentially haurdous materials, such as r toxic substances, fla®tablp or expLaeivo. - '- 90. Substantial change lD d~itd for municipal xrvicd (police , tire, rater, sewge, etc.). x - - 'fl. Subetaatially ixrease to®il fuel coasumpelon (electricity r , oil, natural gas, etc.). - - 52. Relationship to a larger protect or xrtes of protects. , ¢nvirotmmtal getting -See Attached 93. Describe the protect site as tt ex Lsts be tore the protect, including lntor~ matron on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any col^urnl, historical or sceaLC aspects. Describe any existing structures on tBe ~.2- site, and the use of the strut tares. 4ttach Photographs of the site. 3napehots or polaroid photos vtll be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, lncludinR information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. lad State the type of land use (residential, comaerc ial, etc.), inteas ity of land use (one- family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicLnity. Snapshots or polaro ld photos viii be accepted. Certlfi~atlou I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached ezhib its present the data and information required for [his initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best ofi my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation [an be made 6y the Planning Division. ~//' Date: Y- l9. ?/ Signature Lp" ~ ~(I~ Henry Il urakoshi Title Associate Enginee r, P.E. '13 Attachsent - Part I Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 25, 27, 33, 34 The project involves pavement rehabilitation construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, drive approaches and Installation of street lights. The project covers approximately 750 L.F. of public roadway. The anticipated project schedule for cons tructlon is 1n fiscal year 91/92. The project site is located in residential areas. All street improvements have existed for several years. The proposed improvements will not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or any obvious historical, cultural, or scenic aspects. Noise, vibration, dust and odors will increase at the project sites only during the pavement removals and replacements, etc. After completion of the project, all noise, vibration, dust and odors created by this project, will cease to exist and return to the pre-project levels. ~4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II -INITIAL STUDY ENYIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civic Center Drive, dllr. n J,raRnnna 3. Oate of Checklist Submitted _November 6. 1991 4. Agency Requlreing Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Vinmar Avenue, 9th to Chaffer Street Anev I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Nill the proposal result tn: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? K b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? K c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? K d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X e. Any Increase to wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ g f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? K g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground faiiure, or similar hazards? K ~s Page 2 YES MAYBE NO 2. Air. Nill the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x b. The creation of obfecttonable odors: _ _ K c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change to climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. N111 the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, 1n either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes Tn absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water ir. any body of water? X a e. Discharge into surface waters, or 1n any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbldityl _ _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground watersl X i g. Change to the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ x h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwTSe available for public water supp11es1 X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such a5 flooding or tTda1 waves? _ _ x 4. Plant Life. N111 the proposal result 1n: a. Change 1n the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plantsl? x ~ (p Page 3 'S ES MAYBE NO 5. 6. 7. s. 9. 10. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction 1n acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. N111 the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and she11- f1sh, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. N111 the proposal result 1n: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? L1 ht and Glare. Nill the proposal produce new g or g are? Land Use. N111 the proposal result 1n a sus an tai alteration of the present or planned use of an area? Natural Resources. Nill the proposal result 1n: a. Increase Tn the rate of use of any natural resources? Risk of Upset. N111 the proposal Involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to 011, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? x X _ _ X X X X X x X x X x x 7~ Page 4 YE5 MAYBE NO b. Possibie interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency ev~-uation plan? _ _ X 11- Popu l anion. Will the proposal alter the ~ ocl afion, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ X 12. Housi~ng. Will the proposal affect existing oh u~ or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu tn: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ % _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ X -. c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation Systems? _ _ X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? X f. Increases 1n traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,- o~ resuTf in a need for new ar altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protectlonl _ X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools? % d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public faciiities, including roads? K f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X ~g Page 5 YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16 . Utilities. N111 the proposal result in a need ol• r new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? x b. Natural or packaged gas? X c. Comnuni cats ans systems? R d. Hater supply? _ _ X e. Haste water facilities? i _ x f. Flood control structures? X 9• Solid waste facilities? x 17. Human Health. N111 the proposal result 1n: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? K 18. Aesthetics. Ni11 the proposal result to the o s ruc on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result 1n the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _.._ _ X 19. Recreation. Mill the proposal result in an mpa~~n the quality or quantity of exlStT ng recreational opportunities? x 20. Cultural Resources. a. Hill the proposal result 1n the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ x b. NT11 the proposal result Tn adverse physical or aesthetic effects W a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or ob,-ect? _ x c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? x ~9 Page 6 YES 7MYBE NO d. Nill the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential Impact area? _ _ % 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does Lhe prof ect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustain7ng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of Cal7fornla history or prehistory4 _ _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goal s7 (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of tine Nhile long-term impacts will endure well into the future). _ _ X c. Does the pro,)ect have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable4 (A protect myy impart on two of more separate resources where the Impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these Impacts on the enviromment 1s significant.) _ _ X d. Does Lhe pro,)ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indlrectly7 X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra ve escr p ono env rommen a impacts.) 8~ Page 7 IV. DETERMINATION o e comp a ed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION will be Drepared. I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there Mill not be a significant effect in this case because the mt ti gatlon measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed protect tMY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date 4-fA.9/ 2~• ~~•~• 1Tgnai;ure: enrylfu~a osFi--- Associate Engineer, P.E. For: The City of Rancho Cucamonga g~ Attachrent -Part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation or Imuacts 1. Earth b. There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and compaction for the replacement and/or widening sections of asphalt concrete pavement. 3. Mater b. New curb and gutter will facilitate better drainage. 6. Noise a. Existing noise Levels will increase due to~ equipment operations during construction, but could be mitigated by the lnstallatlon of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 13. Transportation/Circulation a, b, d, and f. During the construction operations, traffic and parking will Increase on surrounding streets near the pro,)ect perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation and any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can 6e mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. 14. Public Services a, b, and c. This pro,)ect will have an interim effect an the present pattern of clrcuiatlon of vehicles (1. e., police, f1 re, school). Such clrcuiatlon pattern impacts can be mitigated by prior notlficatlon to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. 8z ---- CITI' OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ATOP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neii, City Engineer BY: Nenry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROYAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY, PARTS 1 AND II, FOR THE PROPOSED CALAVERAS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CNAFFEY STREET ALLEY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE RECOMMENDATION: 1t is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Caiaveras Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street Alley and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGRDUND/ANALYSIS:. This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Caiaveras Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street Alley. In conformance with the California Environmental QuatTty Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned improvements. Said protect entails the rehabilitation and repair of local streets plus the installation of street lights. It 1s the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact an the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classlfted as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, ~'1 \`~ ~. Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. q / ~ ~/ 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCgMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY ANO ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED CALAVERAS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY NHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Calaveras Avenue Street Improvement Protect; and NNEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality qct, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen a ssessment Initial study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Calaveras Avenue Street Improvement Protect. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant die-CTifornla Environmental Quality qct. 8y ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Geosnl Infor•atiam 1. Name and address Of developer or pto~ect mponmor: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center give, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 2. Addreea OC ptalect; Calave ray f.venu -4th Street to Chaf fey Street A11ey Aeeeesor'a Black and r: N/A 3. Name, address, and telephone number of persm to be oontuted concerning thin pto,J eCt; Same as above Lon tact Hen rv Murakoshi (714) 989-1962 4. Indicate number of the permlt aDPlleatioe foe the project to mhieh this form pertains: N/A S. List and describe any other related permits and other public appeovals required for this project, including those required by city, regloml, state and Cedenl aglnCles: Scree[ closure permit; approval of project 6y City Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga 6. F:ttistisg zoning dlatrict: Residential 7. Proposed ux of mite (pto~ect for mltlch this fotm 1s filed): Residential Street PLC,IeCL Dreriptlea - See Attached e. site siu. 9. 9gtare footage. N/A 10. tAnber of !loon of omomtructlem. N/A 11. AmnUltt of off-mttemt parkint pewldmd. N/A 12. Attach plasm. 13. Propceed xhedulLtig. N/A 14. Aamociated peo~mCt. N/A 15. Anticipated inctamshtal development. N/A 16. If rdidential, ihCltde the n~bmr o! uaite, mchedule of chit sizes, range of s•le price or reaU, and Gyps of hauahold m1Zm expectmd. Q ~ «m., .. C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A N/A 17. If cemmrelal, Sadlute the type, whether oeighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of >Qlee area, and laadlag facilities. N/q 18. If Lndustrtal, Sodlcate type, eetla•ted enploymeat per shift, aad loading fac111tiM. Niq 19. If institut tonal, Sndiate the ewtor tuactioa, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and mmunlty benefiu to be derived from the protect. N/A Z0. If the protect involves a variance, canditLOOal use or reroaiag applica- tion, state this aad lodlcate clearly why the appllcatlan is required. Are the followlog trees appllcaDle W the protect or its slicers? Mecum below all items checlmd yes (attach additional emeeta u necessary). Ts No 21. QW~ge in existing features of any bays, tldelaode, beaches, _ x or hills, or suhstantlal alteration of gxouM rmtours. 22. Change Sa scenic view or vistas from existing residential _ x areas or public lands or toads. 23. Ctunge in patters, scale or ctrraater o! general area of _ x protect. 24. 9lgniftcant amounts of solid cute or litter. _ x 25. Q~ange Ln dust, aam, amoioe, fumes or adore in vicinity. x _ 26. Qunge Lo ocean, haq, laloe, sttwm or ground ester quality or _ x quantity, or altentios of esirting drainage patterns. 27. SubeCaatial eNoge to exirting noise or vihratich levels in x the vicLnlty. _ 28. Site an filled load or' as elope of 10 percent or more. _ 29. One of disposal o! pntestially baacdgie wterials, such u toxic subartaaces, flaaeables or eaplasivs, _ 30. Subetantlal chsge in demand for ewticipal servlaaa (polies, fire, ester, swags, etc.). _ _ 3l. SubeRnntially 1nCtatee tomsll fuel wsstmptton (electrLclty, oil, mcunl gu, etc.). 32. N.elationahip Lo a IaRer protect or series of protects. _ ¢nvlromawtal 9etting -See Attached 33. Describe the protest site u It exists before the protect, includLhg ~. -.'~r matron an topography, soil stablllcy, plants and animals, and any r~:t:r3'., historical or'scesic aspects. Describe say existing structures on :~.N g~ site, a¢d the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. S¢apehoca or polarold photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, lac lud ing Snformat ion on plants a¢d a¢imtls a¢d any cultural, historienl or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of lam use (residential, c~erolal, etc.), inte¢sity of land use (one- family, apartment houses, Shope, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, fro¢tage, set-Deck, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vici¢ity. Snapebota or polaroid photos will be accepted. ClrtlfiptioD I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infcrmat ion required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information Dresented are true and correct to the 6esL of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: g_99.11 Signature ~ ~•~-• Henry Mura os i Title Associate Enainee r, P.E. gl Attachment - Part I Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 25, 27, 33, 34 the project Involves pavement rehabilitation construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, drive approaches and installation of street lights. The project covers approximately 750 L.F. of public roadway. The antlcigated project schedule for construction is to fiscal year 91/92. The project site is located in residential areas. All street improvements have existed for several years. The proposed improvements will not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or any obvious Atstorical, cultural, or scenic aspects. Noise, vibration, dust and odors will increase at the project sites only during the pavement removals and replacements, etc. After completion of the project, all noise, vibration, dust and odors created by this project, will cease to exist and return to the pre-project levels. g8 CITY OK RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART IT -INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent _ City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civil Center Drive, anc o ucamonaa. 3. Date of Checklist Submitted November 6, 1991 4. Agency Requireing Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Caiaveras Avenue, 9th to Chaffey 3Ereet ey f. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. N111 the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes 1n geologic substructures? _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ X c. Change 1n topography or ground surface relief features? _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ X _.__ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes 1n siltation, deposition or erosion wfitch may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, Inlet or lake? _ _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground faiiure, or similar hazards? X 8i 2. 3. 4. Al r. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air qua11ty1 b. The creation of obJectionable odors: c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Nate r. Nill the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction ar rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction 1n the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? Plant Life. W111 the proposal result 1n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? Page 2 YES MAYBE NO X X X x X X X X X X X X x 90 Page 3 YES MAYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a Carrier to Lhe normai replenishment of existing species? - _ % d. Redutti on in acreage of any agricultural crop2 _ ~ X 5. Animal life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals {birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects}? ~ _ % b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ % c. introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ % d. Oeterioratlon tv existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X 6. Noise. W111 the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? _ X _ b- Exposure of people to severe noise Tevei s7 _ _ X 7. Limit and Glare. Will the proposal produce new Tfgh o~gTare? _ _ % 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a su`Tisi-anElal alteration of the present or planned use of an area? _, _, __,_ % 9. Natural Resources. W111 the proposal result Tn: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ % 10. Risk of Upset. Wi1T the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to 011, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditlon7 _ K ~) Page 4 YES MAYBE NO b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ X 11. l atio n. Wi11 the proposal alter the Po u ~ ~ oc~n, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing of using or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resuT~fn: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ X 6. Effects on existing parking facilities, ar demand for new parking? _ X _ c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of peopie and/or goods? X e. Alterations to water-borne, roll, or air traffic? X f. increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the porposal have an effect ° upon, or resui'£ Tn a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of publ7c facilities, including roads? _ X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result 1n: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X Z Page 5 YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? i6. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need orb new systems, or substantial alterations Lo the following utilities? a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Waste water facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. So11d waste facilities? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. W111 the proposal result Tn the o s rut on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Mill the proposal result in an mpa~ upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Nill the proposal re suit in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result 1n adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X X X X X X x X X x X X X X X 9.3 Page 6 YES MAYBE NO d. Nill the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential Impact areal _ X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a~ Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wlldiife population to drop below self-sus taining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered punt or animal or eliminate important examples of the motor periods of California history or prehistory? _ X b. Does the protect have the potentiai to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term Impact on the enviromnent is one which occurs to a relatively brief, definitive period of time Nhile long-term impacts will endure well into the future 1. _ _ K c. Does th¢ protect have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? U protect may Impact an two of more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment is significant.) ~ _ X d. Does the protect have envirormrental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra ve escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.) 9y Page 1 IV. DETERMINATION o e comp a ed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: % I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect an the environment, and a CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION will be prepared. I find that aithough the proposed project could have a significant '- effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a slgnlficant effect on the environment, and an ENYIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date f ~ Q?- 4/ /~,_.,lil.~.• S gna ure: enry ura os Associate Engineer, P.E. For: The Ci~of Rancho CucamongaRancho Cucamonga GS Attachment - Part II Discussion of Environmental Evacuation or Impacts I. Earth b. There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and compaction for the replacement and/or widening sections of asphalt concrete pavement. 3. Hater b. New curb and gutter will facilitate better drainage. 6. Noise a. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment o pera Lions during construction, but could be mitigated by the Installation of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 13. iransportatlon/Circulation a, b, d, and f. During the construction operations, traffic and parking will increase on surrounding streets near the project perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation and any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. 14. Public Services a, b, and c. This project will have an interim effect on the present pattern of circulation of vehlcies (i.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by prior notlflcation to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, gluing time, date and duration of said work. 9~ CCCI' OF RANCHO CCCAA70NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AI CP, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer i SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY, PARTS I AND II, FOR THE PROPOSED SIERRA MAORE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM N[NTH STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTN OF CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY AND '~ ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EREMPTION THEREFORE ~~, RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Protect from Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Pro,{ect from Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned Improvements. Said pro,{ect entails the rehab111tat1on and repair of local streets plus the installation of street lights. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,{ect will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements 6e classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, VAn. Joe O'Neil J' ~~ City Engineer NJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO• I I - 3 d~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PRODOSEO SIERRA MADRE RVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTH OF CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has revi erred all available input concerning Lhe proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Pro,iect; and VIHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen a ssessment Initial study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Protect. SECTION 2: The City Clerk 1s directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant o e a forma Environmental Quality Act. 1~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) General Iafoxoatiaa 1. Name a¢d address of developer or pxuJect epomor: cf tv of Rancho cucanronra F~~'na>r' D' 's' 1C'OC C'v'c Center Dr've. Rancho Cucarnonaa, CA 81730 2. Address Of ptoJeCt: M dre Avenue Street Im rovemen [5 Assessor's B1oCk aad t r: fro;r °th St. to 310' south of Chaffer St. Alley 3. Name, address, and telephone dumber of person to he m¢tacted cooceroiog this pro,JeCt: yenrv rt ~rakosh'. A;snciate Enni nee r. P E same address as above (714) 909-1362 ext. 2333 4. Iod icate dumber of the permit aDPlication for the protect to which this foam penalaq: ~/p 5. List add describe a¢y other related permits and other public approvals required for this pro,Ject, Sncludi¢g those required by city, regio¢al, state and Cedenl agencies: _ Srreet Closure Permits: ano royal of pro iect by r;.., r~.~~~;I r. r~ of Ranrhn ucartronoa s. F]cistl¢g zoning district: ri!A 7. Proposed use of site (Protect for ehich this foim is tiled): Re,,,;,;,;,,, ;,,,, ,.v eY,'cr' ar Protect Descrlptiai -See A[cached 8. Site size. 9. Square footage. ~~/a S0. Number of flooro of aonrt ructloh. :l". SI. Amount of ott-street parking provided. !v. ,'. 12. Attach plane. 13. Proposed scheduling. rl/A t4. Associated protect. n/~. 15. Anticipated incremenul development. rU.^. 16. tf reside¢tial, include the number of unite, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale Dricee or re¢ts, snd type of household size expected. G G ~~,~ C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A WA 17. if c~erc lal, indimte the type, whether ¢elgbborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and leading facilities. ry/A 18. If industrial, indimte type, eeti~ted employment per shift, and Loading facilities. ry/A 19. tf instituttonal, indimte the motor function, estimated employment per shift, est Lmated occupancy, loading faculties, and community benefits to to derived from the protect. ry/A 20. If the protect Involves a variance, coodltioml Uae or rezoning applim- tlon, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. Are the tol lowioB items applimble to the protect or its effects? Discuss below all items checl®d yea (attach eddltianal sheets as necessary). Ss No 21. Change in existing features of my bays, tidelands, beeches, _ x or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. CT~ange in scenic views or vistas tram existing rearldentinl _ x areas or public lands or roads. 23. CT~ange in I.atter¢, amle or character of geaenl area of _ x plot act. 24. Signif tcant amounts of solid caste or litter. _ x 25. Change Ln dust, yh, smoke, ftnsee or adore in vicinity. % _ 26. Change in ocean, hay, lalm, stream or grouts eater quality or _ x quantity, or alteration of ezisttng drainage patterns. 27. Substantial change Sn existing miss or vibration levels Sn x _ the vicinity. 28. Site a¢ tilled la¢d or on slope of SO percent or more. 29. Use of diaposl of potentially haardous materials, sash as ' toxic substances, flammables or e:plaeives. _ Uo. Substantial cht¢ge in d®and for municipal xrvices (police, _ fire, star, sewage, etc.). 1t. Substa¢tially imreaae faeail fuel cooaumptton (electricity, _ _ oil, mtural gas, etc.). 92. Relationshtp to a larger protect or xries of protects. _ _ 2nviro¢mratal 9ett1~ -See nccached U3. Describe the protect site as It exists before the protect, 1¢cludl¢g ln!x~ matron on topography, soil stability, plants and anLoals, and any culture:. histortcal or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on t7e ~~~ site, aad the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos wi L1 be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding ptopert les, iuclud ing information oa plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of lead use (residential, coomercial, etc.), intensity o1 land use (one- family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-hack, rear yard, etc. . photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or ) Attach accepted. Polaroid photos will be Certlfiation the attached exh ibitsebpresentftheh dataheand atn ormat ionn requiredovfor nth is initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can 6e made by the Planning Division. Date: ?-29.9/ Signature f~. /~._..,,,~s~,• Tftle Ass„~~a,a c p• IDI Attach~ent - Part I Project Description and Effects: Items 8, 9, 13, 25, 27, 33 b 34 The project consists of new pavement installation; curb and gutter, sidewalk and drive approach construction; utility relocation; new street light installation, etc... The project covers approximately 650 linear feet of public roadway. The anticipated project schedule for construction is in the 91/92 fiscal year. The project site is located in an older residential neighborhood at the southwestern corner of the City. New pavement along with curb and gutter are needed to improve traffic and drainage. Sidewalk Ts needed for pedestrian safety. The proposed improvements will not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or any obvious historical, cultural or scenic aspects. Noise, vibration, dust and odors will temporarily increase at the project site during times of construction. After completion of the project, all noise, vibration, dust and odors created by this project will cease to exist and return to pre-project levels. IbZ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Studv) I. DACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamon a, C1~-91T1~- T713T- 9B'T-TS 3. Date of Checklist Submitted August 21, 1991 4. Agency 0.equiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Sierra tla dre Avenue Street Improvements from Ninth Street to 7l~sou{tl oi-CfiaTfey S{ree{~STley I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are reryuired on attached sheetsl. VES IIAYDE tlU 1. Earth. WI11 the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes Ui geologic substructures? _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ X c. Change in topography or around surface relief features? _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or nmdl flea tion of any unique geologic or physical features? ~ _ X_ e. 'Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? :( f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in sil to tten, de position or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ____ K g. Exposure of people or property to aenlogic ildLards SUCK dS P.ar th n'IB kes, 1gnd 511dnt, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? - _ `~ 3 C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N U A Page 2 YES MAYBE NO 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors: _ X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. WT11 the proposal result tn: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, 7n either marine or fresh waters? x b. Changes 1n absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of wa ter7 X e. Discharge into surface waters, or 1n any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? x g. Change Tn the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through Interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? K h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? R i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ x 4. Plant Life. N111 the proposal result in: a. Change 1n the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? X ~O~I Page 3 YES MAYDE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. W111 the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animalsl c. tntroduction of new species of animals Tnto an area, or result 1n a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 1. Light and Glare. W111 the proposal produce new 1Tg or g are? B. Land Use. M111 the proposal result in a su s an Tai alteration of the present or planned use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. N111 the proposal result in: a. increase 1n the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to 011, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? X X X x x X x X X x x x x loS Page 4 YES MAYBE NO b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? - _ X I1. n. W111 the proposal alter the P oQu la tio ~ ~ ~ ~ ocl -afl"on; distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ~ _ X 12. Housin Will the proposal affect existing ous ng or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result-in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ X _ c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? - _ X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? _ _ % f. Increases 1n traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ % 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or re~E in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. F1 re protection? X b. Police protection? _ % _ c. Schools? _ X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ _ X e. Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result 1no a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X I~W Page 5 YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. M111 the proposal result in a need o~new systems, or substantial alterattons to the following utilities? a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communlcati ons systems? d. Hater suDD1Y? e. Waste water facilities? f. flood control structures? g. So11d waste fac711 ti es? 17. Human Health. N111 the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Hill the proposal result in the o s ruc on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Hill the proposal result in an mpac upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. N111 the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistorfc or historic archaeological site? b. Hill the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or ob,(ect? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X X x X X x x X X x X x x X X ~~~ Page 6 YES MAYBE NO d. Nill the proposal restrict existing reiigious or sacred uses within the potential impact areal X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the pro,{ect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal conmunTty, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have Lhe potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment 1s one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Mh11e long-term impacts will endure wail into the future). _ X c. Does the pro,j act have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may Impact on two of more separate resources where the Impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on Lhe environment 15 significant.) _ r X d. Daes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ % III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra ve escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.) SEE ATTACHED I ri IV. DETERMINATION o e comp eted by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Page 7 X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there w111 not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed pro,~ect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT 1s required. Date A- 21. 7/ ~ ~,(~~' . S gnu azure: enry ura os Associate Engineer, P.E. For: The City of Rancho Cucamon a ~ -I .. Attaclnent - Part ii Discussion of EnvT ronmental Evaluation or Impacts Earth b. There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and compac Lion for the replacement and/or widening sections of asphalt concrete Pavement. , Noise a. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment operations during construction, but could be ml ti ga Led by the ins tallatlon of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equlpmen t. 13. Transportation/Circulation a, b, d, and f. During construction operations, trafflt and parking will Increase on surrounding streets near the protect perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian clrculatlon and any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. 14. Public Services a, b, and c. This protect will have an interim effect on the present pattern of circulation of vehicles Ii. e., police, fire, school). Such clrculatlon pattern Impacts can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. 11D DnrE: ~ T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: - CITY OF RAtiCHU CCCdy10tiG~1 STAFF REPORT r,~„~;r-~ November 6, 1991 I, Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY, PARTS I AND II FOR THE PROPOSED ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND ', AVENUE AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION THEREFORE RECOMIENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Counc ll adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, parts I and II for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Pro,{ects from Yictoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue and issuance of a Categoricai Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Proi ects from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue. Said project entails the construction of the east half of a major street with street lights and a trafflt signal. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed protect will not create a significant adverse Impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these Improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~/ ~< <_~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:HM:Iy Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~/ ~ 3' ~./ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PR0.IECTS FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Protects; and 4MEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial study has been prepared pursuant to the Cal7fornia Environmental Quaiity Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GOES HEREBY RESOLYE as follows: SECTION 1: The City Counc7l of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Lhe Environmeh"Fei-Assessment initial study and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street and Traffic Signal Improvement Protects. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant off{ ei~aTifornia Environmental Quality Act. !~' li3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I - INITIAL STUDY General Inforation 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga L7f-4I'1'2~ 2. Address of project: Rochester Avenue from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: N/A 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required far this project, Including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Street Closure Permit: California Department 6. Existing zoning district: Residential 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Major Street with connection to collector (Highland Avenue) Project Description and Effects: 8. Site Size. See Attachment 9. Square footage. See Attachment 10. Number of floors of construction. N/A 11. Amount of off-street parking provided. N/A 12. Attach plans. N/A 13. Proposed scheduling. See Attachment 14. Associated project. N/A 15. Anticipated incremental development. N/A 16. tf residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A I I ~~ 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A 18. If industrial, indicate Lype, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 20. If the pro,j ect involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or Its effects? Otscuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X areas or public lands or roads. _ 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X prof ect. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. -' 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in X the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or more. X 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as X toxic substances, flamnables or explosives. 30. Substantial Change to demand for municipal services (police, X fire, water, sewage, etc.). 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, X 011, natural gas, etc.). 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. X ~)S Environ~ental Setting: See attached 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34• Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will De accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and Tn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of ~ knowledge and bel7ef. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation tan be made by the Piannin~~~~~~Dtv151on. pate: /O - 9 - 9 / Signature: p_~¢.G4. e Fy ura os i Title: Associate Engineer, P.E. 1~b ATTACHMENT - PART I Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 32, 33, 34 The project involves new pavement, curb, gutter, street lights, drainage catch basins, and traffic signal. The project covers approximately 2600 L.F. of public roadway. The anticipated project schedule for construction is from February 1992 to June 1992. The project is situated 1n an undeveloped area zoned for residential development. The project area is bound by the Day Creek Flood Control Retention Basin, the proposed Rancho Cucamonga High School, the proposed Foothill Freeway and existing and future residential developments. Currently, a dl rt road, which provides iimi ted public access, exists within the project area. The proposed improvements will not have a significant impact on plant animals, land resources, or any historical, cultural, or scenic aspects. This project 1s the last phase of the proposed Rancho Cucamonga Hi 9h School Improvements and is necessary to provide access to this school. The proposed improvement would reduce the traffic impact on the neighboring residential communities. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamon a 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 3. Date of Checklist Submitted November 11, 1991 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if appl7cable Rochester Avenue from Vittoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue Street an ra c ana mprovemen s I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets 1. YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Nill the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, Compaction or over covering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ e. Any Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, Inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazardsl X X X X X X X iig Page 2 YES MAYBE NO 2 3. 4. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of ob,j ecti onable odors: c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Hater. Will the proposai result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, 1n either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water to any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or 1n any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction 1n the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants l? X X X X X X X X X X x X X ~~~ Page 3 YES hV1YBE NO 5. 6. 7. g. 9. 10 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the dlversi ty of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthtc organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration Lo existing fish or wildlife habi Lat? Noise. Mill the proposal result in: a. Increase to existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. will the proposal produce newTfg oh~~re? Land Use. Nill the proposal result in a sub- ss a~TaT alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Nilt the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not 17mi ted to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? _ _ X X X x X X x _ _ x _ _ X X X x X ~2~ Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 6. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ % il. ton. Will the proposal alter the Populat ~ ocT-~~ o~dlstri buts on, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ k 12. Hou sin Will the proposal affect existing ous ng or create a demand for add? tl onal housing? _ _ X 13. Transports tton/Circulation. W111 the proposal resu n: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ _ X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ _ x c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ x d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? _ _ , x f. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ _ X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, o- r resuTf in a need for new ar altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ _ X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental servlcesl _ _ X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result Tn: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X ~2~ Page 5 YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. N111 the proposal result in a need oar new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Mater supply? e. Haste water facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. So11d waste fac111 ti es? 17. Human Health. Mill the proposal result Tn: a. Creation of any heat th hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? I8. Aesthetics. N111 the proposal result in the o s ruc on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. N111 the proposal result 1n an mpac upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. M111 the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. N111 the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? x x X X X x x x X x x X X x 12Z Page 6 YES MAYBE NO c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses wi Lhln the potential impact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to el lminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number ar restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, fu the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? iA short-term impact on the environment Ts one which occurs to a relatively brief, definitive period of time white long-term impacts will endure well into the future 1. _ _._.. % c. Ooes the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two of more separate resources where the Impact on each resource is relativeiy small, but where the effect of the to tai of these impacts on the environment is significant.) _ _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ~ _ X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra ve escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.) 3B. Installation of catch basin will Improve drainage. 7. Installation of street lights will produce new light. 14e. Maintenance, consistent with other roads in the area, will be necessary for this new road. Z~ Page 7 IV. DETERMINATION o e comp eted by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: % [ find the proposed pro,j¢ct COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed pro,~ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there wilt not be a significant effect in this case because the ml Ligation measures descriD¢d on an attached sheet have been added to the pro,~ect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL DE PREPARED. - I find the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT RE~P'ORT isrequired. Date _ /0- 9. 9/ ~~..,(,~. gna ure Associate Civil E~lneer T e 12y APPENDIX E NOTICE OF EXEMPTION T0: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga '- 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 P.0. Box 807 Sacramento, California 95814 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91129 X Clerk of the Baard County of San Bernardino 385 N. A^row ea venue. n oor an ernar no, Rochester Avenue Street Improvements roO ect nue From Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue Nro,7ett ~ocatton - ~pecinc CTt of Rancho Cucamon a San Bernardino ro ec oca on - y ro et oca on - pun y Protect Involves Construction of New Road and_Tra_ffic Signal ell scrip ofi~Aa ure, urpose, an ene car es o ro ec Cit of Rancho Cucamon a ame o u c gency pprov ng ro ec Henr Murakoshi ame o erson or gency arry ng u ro ec Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Deciared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a)) Emergency Protect (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) ~ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. Article 19 Class 1(c) Section 15301 of CEQA easons w y pro ec s exemp Henr Murakoshi 714 989-1862 2333 on ac erson rea o e e ep one x ens on If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the protect? Yes _ No Date Received for Filing Signature City Engineer Title ~Z~ CALIFDRNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE E%EMPTTDN De Minimis Impact Finding Protect Title/Location (lnctude county): Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Projects - from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Protect Description: Project involves the construction of street, curb, gutter, catch basins, and the installation of street lights and traffic signal. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. A Categorical Exemption was prepared and approved for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEpA. 2. The Initial Study prepared for this project determined that the protects will not have a significant effect on wildlife. Certification: 1 hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not indlvldualty or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined~in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. ~~/CCc. /'~ 7 Del (Nilllam Joe D'Ne Title: City Engineer Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: 1Z~ CITY OF RaVCHO CL'CAMONG.a STAFF REPORT r; DATE: November 5, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Map and Improvement Agreement, with the recordation of the Map subject to fulfillment of the condlttons of approval, submittal of securities, and normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney for Parcel Map 13724, located on the south side of Foothtll Boulevard, between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 13124 and the Improvement Agreement, with recordation of Map subject to fulfillment of Lhe conditions of approval, submittal of securities, and normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and C1 ty Attorney. BACI(6ROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 13724 located on the south side of foothill Boulevard, between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26, 1991, for the division of 60 acres into a retail/commercial center. The Natson Company, as the Managing General Partner for Foothill Marketplace Partners, has submitted the F1na1 Map for City approval. Due to time and financial constraints certain aspects of the conditions of approval upon the tentative map, posting of the securities, and certain normal processing Issues have not been completed. The Watson Company request has been reviewed by both the Community Development Director and City Attorney. With this review comes the recommendation that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which will approve Parcel Map 13724 and the Improvement Agreement, but the recordation of said map is subject to fulfillment of the condlttons of approval, submittal of securities, and normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City attorney. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NOVEMOER 6, 1991 PM 13724 PAGE 2 Engineering will continue processing this submittal to insure all conditions have been compl led with and the appropriate securities placed with the City. Upon completion of normal processing, the map then will be sent for recordation. Respectfully submitted, Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer `=~ WJO:OJ:jh Attachments 12Q RESOLUTION N0. ( ( - 3aa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUM3ER 13724 AND IPPROYEMENT AGREEMENT, WITH THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP SUBJECT TO FULFILLMENT OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, SUBMITTAL OF SECURITIES, AND NORMAL PROCESSING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND CIri ATTORNEY. N HE REAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners, and consisting of fifteen parcels located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Eti Wanda Avenue, being a division of sixty acres of a retail/commercial center, was approved by the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on June 26, 1991, and is in canpliance with the State Subdivision MoD Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcei MoD No. 13724 is the final nwp of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, a requirement established as prerequtslte to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City has now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement to be guaranteed by acceptable securities by Foothill Marketplace Partners as developer; and WHEREAS, certain conditions of approval, submittal of securities, and normal processing issues have not been complete; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement submitted by Bald developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for ded lcatlon and the final map del7neattng the same for said Parcel Map No. 13724 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record when the Developer has fulfilled the conditions of approval, submitted securities for said Improvement Agreement in acceptable form and content, and performed normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney. ~ti~ A U ~I s,l ~I • - J ' Q ~ - > ~ ~ . ~ --~-- ~ -' ~ y ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ 3 a W - a i ~~ Q' ~;'3/1k!'J dQNIlMI13 ~ -- - -' ~~~y ~ ~'. ~ S~\ - --- - - - ~ - - -- _ -----~liNlVNM~7 71~~2~~ ~tIQ Q V `~ d U U fs, O ~ "'" ... ~ `'i F U A ., Z .. C ,~ 2 - -- - - CITI' OF RANCHI) Cl"CANONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wrn. Joe O'Neil, C7 ty Engineer ~ BY: Michael D. Long, Supv. Pubtic Norks Inspector SUBJECT: ANARD AND AUTHORIZATSON FOR E%ECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR ~I SIERRA MADRE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED FROM ARRON ROUTE TO N[NTH STREET, FOR THE AMOUNT OF ~ ;159,524.00 (;145,022.00 PLUS 108 CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT ACCOUNT N0. 28-4333-8951 ! RECOMIENDATION: It 1s recommended that the City Council accept all bid proposals as received, award and authorize execution of contract for Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Protect to the lowest responsive bidder, R.G. Construction, for the amount of f145,022.00 and authorize the Administrative $ervtces Director to expend ;159,524.00 (;145,022.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Block Grant Account No. 28-4333-8951. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on October 3, 1991, for the subtect protect. R.G. Construction is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of 5145,022.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was ;188,330.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submt.tted, ~~~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil C1 ty Engineer NJO:LB:;d Attachment cc: Purchasing 131 ~~ $8 a'3888°$8.$$~3~3r„a8$8$8$ 838388r&$8 8m8"' 3°$ r_ $ 3 x _ c _ 88583g8°r88 B~~S 88 88 8 y.iL N~ n.'G F~~ aoz !s 8888888888 888 888 8$ 8 ' is s ~~NC. N~'^ N"~«w u.S L45r M cb~ ~~`~ ~ a'8.88. 8.88888 8888 r$q8q gg$q $ ' Ana - s. ~^ ' s s r ~g 88gg88gg888888 8$88 S$8 088 ' Y --~~~ 888$$$5;888 8888 mR8 852 '~ $,~8«88~'-8~ F~~NOi NS~ Gw ~MNNNr~ y NN J! .-m ~ F; m 3 ~ 8 ~ -, ~& ~~ s~~ 9~~'y~ uy EEy 8 85 FSg ~.~4 ,~m'Y~c¢sy ii 6~Qd~ye9~~~~ 5' ~,. Sys ~a z~Y B.~~~~~oatl Z~~~u~~~e ~~ ¢[¢[ a ~{¢{ii~~ VVU xa y§ ~y ~~~b~~~dgq ~d lv U,VU ~U K O~Ui yc 0 Udyd cabt2 ~.9 S U %Q ~.~62zrcUG96<K ti6 1Y f-~ ~~ d-: NM~N fined fYJ'm ~: .:N.i ./M drd:. ~.. ~~ 13z ~~" $8$388mn$$88R~~$°8.8888.888 9~ $9$$$$$3$a$$~ar$rs$3$$$ J p p ~~ _$8038831888 8n8P nS8 89 8 $.~»F38»~~~ Awl «5, 9N, FAN F FX N ~~ $$$8898,8888888$8n88$8$$$8 ~*e $~R8998°~~si8 m.z~a$aNa~~a.a 3 : t' a89388$8$$ 888.8 ~"'$ 88 8 < c ~ ~~.~~S~i~M19i~~ ~8.&p crA.n .~» N L~< At41 s~2 joz ~` $988 C$$63$$$8&BSi$~88 0889 0899 „L2 ~ ~ •< ~~~~~~N ~ Ma6N~A aim a s'T ' 8,8$$88`3.$$$ 8°8R ~=8 &9, e =Rs Q $~ t'° = rLS=A»~Nfl~~ NMNA AAA NN N ,r-,r~ ~ ~«NN A a a ~~ 8$88888888 8$88, $38 8888 »» GE~`^ N MM ~_~ 96633$~$$p Q6~$63 c~rr (~0 $~ r Y ~~PN.~9$N_9i~ 1;NNA MIR Y~ aN N ffi ytN»NNA NN ~ ~ .. O .p m vt m O _ << 5!8Q~ F_<~ ~~ m 8 s ~1'~l y<, .,j<,. .~%OFWW y~1JN %n vJ.iW ~~ 8 ~ N~~ gg~~~G~~~~~~~ ~,~~ ~ 5 E ~°8 5~9c^9aq ~tlB~ °f~~a1'~~ 5 F _ u U p~8 mS y 9 Q<}~~9 {~ 3~' 's~E~~~'.~~:e ~aov49{tle~~3~~dam n y y g 3~~~uu~ K3 yp qg6 W ~~~~~~z~~d~3,°idi~~i3 ~6ryc~i a~xxsxu<~3:mnm;: dg~ :~ ~~1. ~ :rlri ividr~wd~ ~. '~~N J~'~ ~,~ r 133 a z s~ 3$3$3a$~$$ sa.~~ $s, a. s,$ 3 y"~< ~n~~~tt~s~~ a~g~ ao~ ~~ 3 , N.~N -. 3 M w MSIN~ N~NN NN ~~ r ' 3$88.8,$8.8$88, 8,~R 888.8888$ z S ss Qq; ggQQ Qq Qq < ~ = S~yg~N~GL4~e~"41:1 Li NIY ~GiA~NH~N ~~< M S<Z J.~ p pp ~~z ~ 888$8S$988$8~$$SRR$8888$ 4 K'al •f,~ w '~~ $$88$8$8$ 8S$r Ra8 38 $ os: R- " < urr i 2 i.7g@ 8$$888,8.888, 888$ 0$3 8888 F., 8 '^N~'^ H~hM aS GSY G y_`~ 888888A8,88 8.888. dR.8 80 3 u e °n `~'3yy5'3$F~y 8 ~ ~~ ~~9E~p~~ ~ ~ ,~~ 2~.ym'~5~9~~p3Q MC~VifV~ 3 S iY ~~ JIK e~ytl~ ~9~i~ W ~C ~y d 3g aUUUU&x3 }'F,~ ~~~ ~Ryp~~u ~~ @~rvaii fu i~ tr.~~uc~ G.'OO.szdzul~<z .. bo !e a%oe"yi-~"` v ~ NNridKan.d~d N~{~N die! a~ ~3y ---°-- CI'CS' OF KANCNO CI?CAMCINGA STAFF REPORT DAZE: November 6, 1991 7l?: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: terry B. Fulwaod, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT CONTRACTS FOR REFINANCING OF DAY CREEK MELLO•ROOS DISTRICT FOR 84•I Recommendation Approve the contracts of Stone and Youngberg, underwriters; Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates, financial advisors; and Brown, Harper, Burns and lientschke, Attorneys Itt 1984, the City of Rancho Cucamonga formed as Mello-Roos District entitled "Day Creek Special District 84-1." The purpose of the district was to finance infrastructure for a drainage system running from the northernmost boundary of the City down to 4th Street. It was a joint project involving the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. Most of the infrastructure financed by this district has been constructed, and the County Flood Control District is the key agency managing the cons ruction of much of the facility. Staff, in its cominuing effort to minimize costs, has explored the possibility of refunding Day Creek's $17,000,000 in bonds. The down-turn in the economy has pushed interest rates down. This can equate to savings for the City. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT CONTRACTS FOR REFINANCING OF DAY CREEK MELLO-ROOS DISTRICT FOR S4•I November 6, 1991 Page 2 Staff requested Stone and Youngberg, underwriters, to provide a financial analysis to determine the viability of doing a refunding. All indications suggest that this would be an ideal time to do a refunding. The nominal dollar savings would be approximately $2.3 million. This would reflect a present value savings of $1,230,000, or an annual savings of approximately $155,000. These savings may be magnified more so, because no credits are reflected in this analysis for insurance premiums. According to our underwriter, the financial savings are significant and would certainly justify a refunding. Additionally, the City's financial adviser, Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates, also believes that this is a viable financing. However, we should move forward quickly with the refunding to capture the current low interest rate. [f the interest rate were to increase, it could change the viability of doing [he refunding. Respectfully submit[ed, ~~~~~ erry B. Fulwood lleputy City Manager JBF/pr 41-264 13b City of Rancho Cucamonga CFD No. 84-1 1991 Proposed Refunding --000•- Savings Report Cumulative Date Total Prior D/S Savines Savin¢s 8/1/92 $1,698,927.08 $2,033,037.50 $334,110.42 $334,110.42 8/1/93 $1,874,962.50 $2,033,825.00 $158,862.50 $492,972.92 8/1/94 $1,875,075.00 $2,034,025.00 $158,950.00 $651,922.92 8/1/95 $1,975,575.00 $2,027,975.00 $152,400.00 $804,322.92 8/1/96 $1,876,425.00 $2,031,195.00 $154,770.00 $959,092.92 8/1/97 $1,877,130.00 $2,027,670.00 $150,540.00 $1,109,632.92 8/1/98 $1,877,165.00 $2,032,260.00 $155,093.00 $1,264,723.92 8/1/99 $,1,877,105.00 $2,028,520.00 $151,415.00 $1,416,142.92 8/1/00 $1,876,505.00 $2,031,280.00 $154,775.00 $1,570,917.92 8/1/01 $1,879,905.00 $2,026,625.00 $146,720.00 $1,717,637.92 8/1/02 $1,876,505.00 $2,032,415.00 $155,910.00 $1,873,547.92 8/t/03 $1,876,135.00 $2,031,830.00 $155,b95.00 $2,029,242.92 8/1/04 $1,877,955.00 $2,029,415.00 $151,460.00 $2,160,702.92 8/1/05 $1,876,095.00 $2,029,260.00 $153,165.00 $2,333,867.92 13 `l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assoc Late Engineer e~ . SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY FORA PORTION OF 25TH STREET, LOCATED NEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE (APN: 225-082-01) RECOMMEMDATION IC is recommended City Counc7l adopt the attached resolution declaring a portion of 25th Street as surplus property and authoriz tng the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On July 12, 1989, Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 14139 which is a residential subdivision of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Etlwanda Avenue and 25th Street. One of the conditions of Tentative Tract 14139 is to vacate the south half of 25th Street which is adjacent to the northerly property line of the protect site. On September 18, 1991, City Council ordered the vacation of said portion of 25th Street. Since 25th Street is owned 1n fee title by the City, and the vacation has occurred, the City needs to dispose of the excess property. Through these proceedings Ahmanson Developments, Incorporated, will obtain the southerly 10 feet of the vacated street and use the land as part of the lots for Tract 14139, the northerly 20 feet will be used for a storm drain facility. The Disposition of the property 1s in conformity with the adopted City General P1 an and draft Etlwanda North Specific Plan. Respectfully (s~ubmi~tted, Nm. Joe 0'N 11 1 '- ~~ City Engineer NJO:JS:diw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9/ .. ~95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN A. Recitals. (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in those certain parcels of real property generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description of said property is set forth Tn that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference set forth herein. (11) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows: "A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and en,ioy real and personal property, and control and dispose of 1t for the common benefit." (111) California Government Code Section 31351 provides in pertinent part, as follows: The legislative body (City Council) may.;. dispose of, and convey such property for the benefit of the City.... (iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on August 14, 1991, that disDOSing of said property, as herein contemplated, would be 1n conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (v) Said property was acquired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in fee, for street and highway purposes the need far which has been superseded by the development of Tract Nc. 14139. (vi) By Resolution No. 91-246 this City Council vacated and abandoned the public street and road easements overlaying said property. (vii) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer necessary or convenient for the purposes for which it was acquired. 13q CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0, 25TH ST. NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 (viii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property. (ix) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. All facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds that the quit claiming of said property to the persons described in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 140 RECORCINO REOUEBTEC 8Y r NM,! !Nl., ~esw Clry f FbY ,41D WNIM 11F4OIIDfO YYt i0 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 YlK iA! nMeNE„n m I SPACE AEOVE TNIS LINE FOR RECOROER'8 U8E -1 DOCUYEMMYTRMDFERTM! _COYMIrlO ON FiNL VALV! OF FIIpFEIrrY CONVEYED, -OR COYFUTEO OM FULL VALUf IFLE LIfNE MO ENCUYFMNCEt RfYAININa AT TIME OF 6laE lWlubnM MClfnM aAp,NMMYMNq 4x FNm Nlm! J' Corporation Quitclaim Deed FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hercby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Calfornis hercby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS, INC. the following described rcal property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Coun[y of San Bernardino, Slate of California: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" and "B" Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: ,Mayor Attest: ty e X41 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR AHMANSON CE`JE LOPNENT. VACATION OF THE SOUTH l0' OF 25TH STREET. EXHIBIT "A" BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1// OF SECTION 20, TOHNS HIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 NEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PUT OF SAID LAND APPROVED NY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVEMBER lJ, 1985, IN THE CITY OF PANCHO CVCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BEANAROINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS POLLONS: REGINNING AT THE EAST 1// COIWER OF SAID SECTION 30, SAID POINT ALSO NEING IN THE CENTERLINE OF 25TH STREET; THENCE, ALONG THE EASTERLY DINE OF 9AI0 SECTION 30, SOUTH 00'00'23^ NEST, 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A ]0-FOOT STRIP OP LWO GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OP SAN SERNAADINO AS RECORDED IN 800K 2117, PAGE 586 OF OFFICIAL AECOA0.9 OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89'26'31" NEST, 1165.11 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND GRANTED TO SOUTHERN SUAPIIIS REALTY CO. AS RECORDED IN LOOK 816Jr PAGB 17 OF SAID OPPICIAL RECORDS: TXENCEr AIANG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 11•U'01" EAST, I1.Bl FEET TO SAID CENTERLINE O! 25TH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/Ir SECTION 20; THENCE, ALONG SAID CENTERLINEr SOUTH 89'26'51" EAST, 11)5.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.74 ACRES, MORE OR LE95. ALL A9 MORE PARTICULARLY 9HONN ON EXHIBIT ^B^ ATTACHED HERE70 AND HEREBY MADE A PRAT HCAEOP. MARIE L.S. BBJ1 a ~ RAftll '~.. ..~° APRIL 33, 1989 10172.00 (A3J1-OOJ-06) 8957-CMV-10172.00-8 ~ ~1 Z ~XHI6IT "B BEING A 'OA7ION CF 'HE SOUiHEASi ~/d OF S~C•:~4 'ONNSHIP '. 40RiH. RAHCE 5 wESL SAN 9ERN ARVINO "ERI OI AN. ;N THE CIiY CF RANCHO CVCAMONGO. °OUNir OF SAN BEFNARVINO. S1A1E OF CAl IF0~9NIA VACATION Of THE SOVTH 30' Of 25th STREET ` ~~ ~ a^ f ~ j L.. ~ r"y D a SSA, 'A It a< CJ~~ I i ~ 20' 9/Y rOR ROn0 a uauc unui;ES vsR OfflCi Al PI At of c.L O. it A I I w W 24' `~~ ~ f '- I { I ]0' S CALEB i^ 200' 4 IN'VI'01• E Ni.N]' L i+ N I ]o' R/w ro cpuNn OF SnM NERNAROINO PEfl O.R. 21 N]/]t6. ~ I w I a A ~ I ~~' ~ N \ _ 2`~ S~ I • Zo - I ~ 5~c = ~~~ . I I I 0.79 AC. I I ~- 26np.J]' ~ 5 00'00'22' V 52V p.6i' \\` ~ ulo s~dva m+•0 f • ~ t till N ~ ~ ri ~?acw~ 2' r I,~~ ~y~ E'Lr LixE SE<~ 20 26.0.].' P.O.B. E 1/t LOR, ^~P,. 20 C[TY OF RANCHO CUC~iMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: AREE~NT OR ONPSITE RTEIRORARYATDETENT ON EBASNIN, IMPIROYEMENT AGREEhENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IAFROYEMENTS FDR TRACT N0. 14139, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEfffNi AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES KITH AHMANSDN DEVELOPMENTS AND NATi INLAND EMPIRE, INCORPORATED, FDR OFF-SITE IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14139, 14379 AND 14380, ORDERING THE ANNEJ(RTION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 0.N0 STREET LIGHTING ONITNE~SOUTiM1IESTICCORNER OF~25TH STREE7A0.NDOETINANOA AVENUED SUBMITTED BY AHMANSON OEYELOP'£NTS i RECOMIEN6ATI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 14139, accepting the subsect agreements and securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Matntenanca Oistrlct No. 7 and Street lighting Matntenanca District Nos. 1 and 7 and authortzin9 the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and cause said maps to record. BACK6RODND/ANALYSIS Tract Nas. 14139 is located on the southwest corner of 25th Street and Etiwanda Avenue in the Low Density Residential District. The Tentative Map consisting of 119 s1n91e family tats on 54 acres acres of land was approved by Planning Commission on July 12, 1989. The Developer, Ahmanson Developments is submitting an agreements and securities to guarantee the canstructton of their public on-site improvements in the fotiowtng amounts. On-site Street Improvements On-51 to Storn~ Drain Construction and Removal of Temporary Basin Landscape FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND 7;1,300,000 903,000 215,000 402,000 52,821,000 LABOR ANO MATERIAL BOND S 650,000 451,500 108,000 201,000 ~ (1,410,500 J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14139 - ANMANSON DEVELOPMENTS NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 Ahmanson Developments is also submitting a Joint Improvement Agreement and Securities with Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated. Watt fs Bevel opf ng Tentative Tract 13527. This site is directly south of Tentative Tract 14139 and fs conditioned to complete many of the same off-site public improvements. The securities to guarantee the cons trot tlon of the off-site public improvements are as follows: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Etiwanda Avenue. North f 347,000 of 24th St. Etiwanda Ave. Storm Drain 358,000 24th St. Adjacent to TR 14379 350,000 24th St. Adjacent to TR 14380 458,000 24th St.Storm Drain - Debris 2,040,000 Basin to Spreading Grounds Channel "H" d Debris Basin 876,000 CCND Access over Channel "H" 54,000 Channel "H" Adjacent to TR 14139 646,000 Northerly Channel XIV-8 576,000 Etiwanda Ave. Street Improvement 214,000 Summit Ave. to 24th St. Interim Basin and Outlet to 731,OOD Spreading Grounds f6,652,00D LADOR AND MATERIAL BONG f 173,500 179,000 175,000 229,000 1,020,000 439,000 27,000 323,000 288,000 107,000 365.500 f3,326,00tl In addition a Pre-Condemnation Agreement for acquisition of right-of-way to construct the 24th Street Storm Drain and interim de tendon basin within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds from San Bernardlno County Flood Control District and San Bernardino County and an agreement to guarantee the maintenance of a temporary on-site detention basin is submitted for approval. Copies of the agreements and securities are available fn the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ' r' ~,;r~(`iLc~ ~ Wm. Joe O'Neil ~J City Engineer WJO:JS:dlw Attachment 14s' RESOLUTION N0. "/ /-~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADP ROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT N0. 14139 MHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 14139, consisting of 119 lots, submitted by Ahmanson Deveiopments, Subdivider, iocated on the north side of 25th Street, west of EtTwanda Avenue, in the Low Density Residential District has been submitted to the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and 1n compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of 'said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security 15 accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and That the offers fc^ dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized Lo execute the certificate thereon on behalf of sold City. __, - ~ L}~ )~ ., . _ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF 1MiP, PRE-COIJDEM;JATION AGREEDifNT, ~ r AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION 6ASI.V, MPROVEMEN7 AGREEMENT AND IIdP ROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 0.4-SITE PUBLIC IMP ROYEMENTS FOR TRACT N0. 14239, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ~ AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES 'd ITH AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS INLAND EMPIRE, INCORPORATED, FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FO RDTRACT NOS, 14139, 14379 AND 14380, ORDEPING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE NA INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHT IDJG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS, 14139 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ZSTH STREET AN6 ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED GY AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS RECO11£NDATION 4~=--.- ~~.~ ~z.,.~~: ,~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE M4INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 4' w RESOLUTION N0. Q -~//~~; ~ ~, ~~~~ ~' 1' ~ v / <' .? „~ ~ ~~: i~a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO •~~ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEhENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT N0. 14139 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 14139, consisting of 119 lots, submitted by Ahmanson Developments, Subdivider, located on the north side of 25th Street, west of Eti Wanda Avenue, in the Low Density Residential District has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdf vi si on Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval Said F1na1 Map offering for dedf ca ti on for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THE REFDR'c, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fanc ho fuc amo ng a, California, as follows: That said Improvement ?g rae:nent be and the same is approved and Lhe Mayor is authorized to executo same RESOLUTION N0. 9/'' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 7 FOR TRACT N0. 14139 Cal lforniauH he sA previousl yT f nned na ispec ial tmatntenante district pursuantgto the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", befog Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and "LandscapingEendSLlghtingpActiof 1972"fauthorize the a nexatlon of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and proceedingsHtoannexathetproperty described ton Exhlblt "A° attachedsheretotand Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and to be annexedRto thelMaintenancenDlstrlctrhave~flledhwithhtheeCityoClerkotheir written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are alt true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation described 1n Exhibit "Bvoattachedxhereto to the Maintenance District areas as SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including t~TTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ly ~ ~~ THE KEITH COMPANIES EXHIBIT "B" AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT TRACT NO. 14139 STREET LIGHTS TO BE MAINTAINED BY STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 7: DISTRICT NO. 5800 LUMENS 7 65 STREET TREES TO BE MAINTAINED BY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7: STREET NAME AMOUrv•P ETIWANDA AVENUE 60 NORTH RZM WAY 86 GOLDEN PRAIRE DRIVE 44 STAGECOACH COURT 23 CHEYENNE COURT 33 SAUEBRUSH COURT 34 .~„~„y MEADOW BROOK COURT 27 SILVER RIDGE ROAD 8 ='s^te•-- ROCK CREEK ROAD 68 RIDGE CREST DRIVE 67 a.""; ~;;'" DEL NORTE PLACE 10 CIMARRON COURT 19 .+^cua:e LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE MAI NTAINED BY LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 7: STREET/LOT TYPE S0. FT. ETIWANDA AVENUE TREES/SHRUBS 21,850 , LOT S P.C.C. ACCESS ROAD 4,360 ~~ LOT T TREES/SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER 6,970 P.C.C. ACCESS ROAD LOT V TREES/SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER 17,420 LOT W TREES/SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER 8,280 LOT X TREES/SHRUBS/GROUNDCOlrER 10,890 LOT Y TREES/SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER 5,660 88BO~tm 10870-b .•+, >e0 CB~A . °i sea a n Arewo L. , 4esa ?1E i5 -_ 3f1N3A tl tlONtl M113 Q n N N A P h n n n tD r m A W n n n n n ~_ - Z~ OM _ ~ m ~ eno~ ` HOtl093Stl15 ~ o lb OJ HSOtlS390 ~_ V e m W r ~ } ~O 'D ~ e ~ ~ ~ N ~~O U Z r t ~ ~ n I } OF 0 a ~ = 3 ~ m r m x m m °m m m ° UC 7Q v a QF o ~ n p 1tlnOJ 3NN3A3H n ~~ o r m m m m m m r ~ , ~ ' N ^~ ~ r n r 1 ! ~,~ ~ a ~- '~i ~ ~ ~ ^ n " G m N M !,- V W ~~ ~~ M ~ v ~ m N ~ ~ f 01 `~ -• N~ ~ I W a °' tl' o - ~ N ~° M ~ ~ Oml ~ M ~ ~ / !/ m % _ r _ n - _ ~ ~ ~ [~~ G r~i M ~ ~ ~ W 0 ~ N f \/ ~ ti n 1 c w M ~ q b M °J ° o N w e ~1: n - o n ~~ 0 n 0 = - _ -- ~- m e r ~ ~ ~~ - N O h n w '~ N O rc m u O ~ c. i.i ~~ y - Z. r ~ u N _ ~ U ~ r N ~ r F Z ~ {/jY W Q~Z n N 0 QW~ a N N m QaQf O a U U N (ONO/ d, 2 ~ 2 F QWQ~ N J m J 0 ` N ~._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 / T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jae Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SU&IECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEi~NT AGREEMENT AND IMDROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 (TENTATIVE TRACT 13527) JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WITH WATT INLAND EMPIRE AND AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379, 14380 ANO 14139, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MITI NTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379, 14380, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET, WEST OF ETIWANOA AVENUE SUBMITTED BY WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC. RECOMMENDATIpI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Nas. 14379 and 14380, accepting the subject agreements and securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Ma lntenance DTstrict Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and cause said maps to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Nos. 14379 and 14380 are part of Tentative Tract 13527 and are located on the northwest corner of 24th Street and Etiwanda Avenue in the low Density Residential District. The Tentative Map consisting of 88 acres of land was approved by Planning Commission on September 26, 1988. The Developer, Natt Inland Empire, Incorporated, is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of their public on-site improvements in the following amounts. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14379 -WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC. NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 ronrr ,n nra On-site Street Improvements On-site Storm Drain Installation of Temporary Basin and Line 0 Removal of Temporary Detention Basin landscape FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND S 369,000 81,000 257,000 208,000 313,000 51,294,000 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND f 184,500 43,500 128,500 104,000 186,500 E 647,000 TRACT 14380 On-site Street Improvements S 679,000 E 339,500 On-site Storm Drain 412,000 206,000 Installation of Temporary 257,000 128,500 Detention Basin and Line 0 Removal of temporary 208,000 104,000 Detention Basin Landscape 605,000 302,500 52,161,000 E1 ,080, 500 Watt Inland Empire Incorpdrated 1s also submitting a Ooi nt Improvement Agreement and Securities with Ahmanson Developments. Ahmanson is developing Tract 14139. This site is dl rec tly north of Tentative Tract 13527 and is conditioned to complete many of the same off-site public improvements. The securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site pu611c improvements are as follows: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Etiwanda Avenue. North E 347,000 of 24th St. Etiwanda Ave. Storm Drain 358,000 24th St. Adjacent to TR 14379 350,000 24th St. Adjacent to TR 14380 458,000 24th St.S torn Drain - Debris 2,040,000 Basin to Spreading Grounds Channel "H" 8 Debris Basin 818,000 CCWD Access over Channel "H" 54,000 Channel "H" Adjacent to TR 14139 646,000 Northerly Channel %IV-B 576,000 Etiwanda Ave. Street Improvement 214,000 Summit Ave. to 24th St. Interim Basin and Outlet to 131 000 Spreading Grounds 56,652,000 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND E 173,500 179,000 175,000 229,000 1,020,000 439,000 27,000 323,000 288,000 107,000 365,500 53,326,000 I$~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14379 - MATT INLAND Ei4'IRE, INC, NOYENBER 6, 1991 PAGE 3 In addition a Pre-Condemnation Agreement for acqui sitton of right-of-way to construct the 24th Street Storm Drain and Interim detention basin within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds from San Bernardino Caunfy Fldad Controi Dtstrlct and San Bernardino County and an agreement to guarantee the maintenance of a temporary an-site detention basin is Submitted for approval. Copies of the agreements and securities are available 1n the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~) ~ Wm. Joe O'Neil ~ City Engineer NJO:JS; dlw Attachment !SZ RESOLUTION N0. ~( j~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14319 AND 14380 WNE AEAS, the Tentative Map of Tract Nos. 14379 and 14380, consisting of 118 lots, submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated, Subdivider, located on the north side of 24th Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low Density Residential Dist..^ict has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved 6y said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by sold City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security 1s accepted as good and sufficient, sub,lect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 153 RESOLUTION N0. ~1 ~~ ! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS, 14379 AND 14380 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to Lhe terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Att of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhi6lt "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to 6e annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the CTty Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: that the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "8" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including t~Fe~evy of ait assessments, shall be appitca6le to the territory annexed hereunder. ti S.SLi FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer , 6Y: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, PRE-CONDEY,"JATION AGREEMENT, h1A INTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION 6ASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND I"dP ROVEMEN7 SECURITIES FOR ON-SITE PUOLIC ~. IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 (TENTATIVE TRACT ~ 13527) JOINT IMPftOVEMENi AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECU RI7IES WITH WATT INLAND EMPIRE AND AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS FOR OFF-SITE - IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 14379, 14380 AND 14139, OROE RING THE ' ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE NA INTENANC.E DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET ~~. LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379; 14380, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 20.TH STREET, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBMITTED BY WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC, f ~, E. ~ ti'n' / ~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~/ ~ ~~ ..~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA HO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONOEMNAT N AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORA DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 RESOLUTION N0. ~' - ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NDS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972°; being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take s~~cceer~i ngs to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and ~:corpurated herein Sy this referenced to the Maintenance District; and 'WHEREAS, all of the owner; of prcperty ~wi thin the territory proposed ASSESSMENT O/ACRA,N ' UN09GPfYA/NTENANCfO/STA'/LT NO. ) LEGEND EXHI6IT "A" GANOSCAPE AREAS BY ~ NOSCAPE ER MA/NTENANfE / _ dSTR/CT aTY NAh'TAAEU STREET TREE AREA aTY ANOVTAA£O {/ COAMA/TY TRA2 `Cg' C/TY AlA/VTANEO MFLYAN <or . S 9• 6 7 B 1 cA A ~~ G~.l ~,~/ ,o / ars ~ \ /~~ 9 R TO q /, 2/ /2 ~\ rJ X J 27 /9 1 /9 + p T3 .- aar 5 re i3 / 8 ~. 29 I~ /7 76 JS _. _i_ ~.-_.._ ~.~ ~~ carer J4 7S 26 P7 TB 79 JO J/ JT JJ L--'-_ rRacrNO. r~9r~ .m,..,,, .,. __ cirro~ RANCHO CUCAMONCA ENC1NEEflS, INC TgACT NO. fI919 w.«,,,.,~~. ~~ LEA ::/". ~9D-/359-0 I ASSESSMENT O/AGgAM STREETLpNT/MO yA/NTENANCEO/STRKTNO. !/ E%HIl3IT "A" LEGEND . s9oa LLMEN srgEEr c.rwrs ro BE MAwrAwEB Br 0 9300 LLpIEN S'rgEEr L.YwT MAwrENANCE d5rq/Cr /ror 7 a- \ // s 0 V ! 9 ~ ~l ~~d ~~ • \ B ~ // ~~~ a Z /2 20 ~\ 0 /J J 22 /9 /9 2 2J I r, car I~ /B ;, /J 10 I~ /) /6 V / JJ Buuu~ ~'~-- ~-.l • couvr J9 ?3 26 7r 2B 79 JO ~ J? 3J G/TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MA/NpENAN EEA/N/G/T ENGINEERS INC ~„ ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,~ „, ~,.. TRACT NO. 1379 .~..~.. ~,. ~~. ou.759/ ..n er cearon CEd S!. 90i'SJ J.N. 90.135.4.04 July 23, 1991 EXHIBIT "B" WATT INLAND EMPIRE TBACT NO. 14379 Street lights to be maintained by Street Liahtina Districts No 1 8 No 7• District No. 5800 Lumens 9500 Lumens 1 - 0 - 26 EA 7 14 EA _ 0 _ Street trees to be maintained by Landscape Maintenance Dis ri t No 7• Tract No. Stre_~ Name Amount 14379 Aruba Court 9 Bahama Covrt 37 Bermuda 27 East Overlook Dr. 23 Total Trees: 90 Landscape area to be maintained by LdndsCaDe Maintenance DistriC No 7 Tract No. StYee___ t Nap Tvoe $a.Ft 14379 24kh Street Parkway Ground Cover 21,450 24th Street Median Ground Cover 6,683 Etiwanda Avenue Ground " Cover 38,985 Lot B" Ground Cover 1.600 Total Area: 68,718 5-14379. rk1 ASSESSA/ENT D/AGRAM LAN0.4GIIEYA/NTENANCEOr9rtrCT NO. 7 EXHIBIT "B" dq ~` JJ JJ ~~ ,r2 J6 ql~ q6 9J I{V J/ JT W 4q p Jp f JB J9 qp C 29 ~~ q/ 9J . 29 ~~~{q[Ay, q2 Jq JJ 2T ' J2 S/ SJ Jp 99 26 99 y~ J6 tC• 2J '~ 62 6J JT BO 6q 29 G 6J J9 d70 2J n ~. J9 IY p/ ry \ 66 `~ /~0' T2 TO ~\ 6T 22 2/ / TJ I ~' ~- _ T9 73 69 6B ' ~~`~~ ~i9 T6 \~~ T~~` /6 q RLS-tea \~ `~ /9 ` ~~ l9 +.\~ ``. LJ y 9~ %~~ \ /2 \ ~\ -~ \ ~ ' y ~ \~ // r Y \ X ~ p ~`\ ~ ~~ J i ~I ~ ro ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ '~\ `, 9 . `, . LEGEND `\~~~,`..` T B I aAM75CAPE AREAS r~-y ,IdNTAM'D `~ TO BE MAIVTA/4£p ~ BY LAMJSGPE '~'~~'~ \~~~`,`` NAiVTENANCE .~ asrRicr ~ .~' , arr NANrAnEv STREET TREE AREA TRACT NO. f~9BO "" C/TY OF Ir _ RANCNO CUCAA/ONOA JI ~~'1~ENGlNEENS. INC TRACT NO. f~O.YBO nw nw.u[.amm~.cumo.w ~u~. ~,.....w 9...~n .,....,... c..~rn. ~o, n r.. u.n anon n artrto n ie. 7-5-A' E.EB. SF. 9p-lJS-I-OI ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM ~nreEruaRnwvwArwrEwAwcrasrwACrwa /i>- EXHIBIT "B" LEGEND a~~o nr•~ - -- II ~I 'I~ENG/NEEAS. /NC ~v C/TYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET L/OHT/NQ YA/NTENANCE EXN/6/T TRACT NO. f4JB0 sF .~ • Jeoo tt~v srREEr cKwrs ro RE wawrANEO er srREEr cKNr O 9700 tCMN MANIENANIE psTRK7 ERH I6IT "6" / /LL /ILM •. -~~. ~ :~ : Y ~ ~:`~~~~ wax . , . :: - ..t, ~,~.. ,~, : ~ o - ~- - :• . M rv~ ~R ~ NrELav BEavrs y . BASev ~ W ~ . ~ ' t . . ,y ~ `,:~ .t:~~ 2 ~ ..; . F~~ , ,~ Y ~ f , : , ; .... \ :~``~S wax iY4 ~~ P~ ~ Y. iQ`p 2 9~ P[LIAY LEGEND LAM7SCAPEO AREAS .p '~~J'~° ~ I TO BE ALdN7AI1E0 .~. •~ - ~~ ~~ BY LA/tlSCApE ' ~""~"`° ~~ C/TYOFpANCNO CUCAMONOA UN09CAPf MA/N7fAG1NCf fXN/e/T EN(7/NEER3, lNC /NTEMYOEIR/90AS/N ~...ew..,.F.~.~L,.,.~. '~'~ TiPA TNO. 0 .. a mow....... ~~., ~..r~. an as n .xa~u v u 6-I-A' CER SF -I J.N. 90.135.4.04 July 23, 1991 EXHIBIT "H" WATT INLAND EMPIRE TRACT NO. 14380 Street lights to be maintained by Street Lichtinc Districts No 1 & No 7- Q~S triCt No. 5800 Lumens 9500 Lumens 1 - 0 - 16 EA 7 36 EA _ p _ Street trees to be maintained by Landscape Maintenan District No 7• Tract No. Street Name Amount 14380 Cambria 4q Carmello Court q6 Cervantes Place 23 West Overlook Dr. 35 San Pablo Court 9 Cammarrio Court 16 Socorro Drive 14 North Overlook dr. 10 Debris Basin Total Trees: 219 Landscape area to be maintained by Landscape District No. 7: Tract No. Street Namg Tvoe So Ft 14380 North Overlook Drive Ground Cover 3,921 EtiNanda Avenue Ground Cover 55,815 24th Street (East of Cervantes) Ground Cover 37 854 24th Street Median , (East of Cervantes) Ground Cover 7,862 Cervantes Place Ground Cover 2,517 Debris Basin Ground Cover 49.286 Total Area: 157,255 S-14380.rk1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer a~3 . SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA STREET CAPPING AGREEMENT FOR OUTLINING TIME AND PHASING LIMITS REGARDING PLACING THE FINAL ASPHALT CAP ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, SUDMITTED BY LEN IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, AND NESTERN LAND PROPERTIES RECONENDIITIDN The City Council approve the attached Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign the same. BACKGROUND/AMAIYSIS Lewis Homes has several phases of development within their planned community. Each phase, as they are conditioned, are required to construct street improvements. This may include construction of a street which is adJacent to vacant land that is planned for future development. If the street is fully constructed, Including the final 2" asphalt cap, then the future development mdy create unusual wear and Lear caused by construction vehicles as well as utility trenches which create uneveness in the street surface. In order to provide fora suitable final pavement condition an agreement has been prepared allowing for the final cap to be delayed and not be a requirement of the first phase of development for certain Lewis protects. The agreement outlines the limits of the streets and provides for when the final cap needs to be complete. The agreement also glues time limitations by which the capping must be complete regardless of the status of the developments. The agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorneys office and Engineering staff. Staff recommends that the agreement be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. Respectfully submlt~d, Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:DJ:th Attachment t ~ Z TERRA VISTA STREET CAPPING AGREEMENT This Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this day of November, 1991, by and between Lewis Homes of California, a California general partnership, Nestern Land Properties, a California limited partnership, and Lewis Development Co., a California general partnership (collectively, "Lewis") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"), RECITALS Lewis is the owner and developer of that certain real property in the City located within the Terra Yista Community Plan. The real property within the Terra Yista Community Plan is delineated on that 6ocument attached hereto as Exhibit "A," incorporated herein by reference, and is hereafter referred to as "Terra Vista." D. City has enacted Ordinance No. 430 which restricts the number of energy connections in a particular project to a proportion equal to the percentage of completion of all development improvements required as conditions of development approval and prohibits energy connections for more than ninety-five percent (95%) of a project prior to the completion and acceptance of all such development improvements. Consistent with good engineerfng and construction practices, the public streets within Terra Vista are installed in two lifts. The first lift, which consists of the installation of abase material and an asphalt base street, is typically installed prior to commencement of onsite construction. The second 11ft, which consists of the installation of an approximately two fnch cap of asphalt pavement on top of the first sift, is typically installed after completion of construction of onsite improvements in order to repair and conceal utility trench cuts and to avoid damage to the asphalt cap that would inevitably occur during the onsite construction process due to the use of heavy machinery and equipment on such public streets. Due to the fact that Lewis' projects within Terra Vista are sometimes conditioned upon the dedication and fnstallation of certain public streets ("Public Streets") which proceed well beyond the boundaries of the property being developed and the fact that such Public Streets are frequently adjacent to other parcels of property within Terra Yista on which onsite construction will occur in the future, City and Lewis agree that in order to enhance the structural integrity and appearance of the Public Streets within Terra Yista and to minimize Lhe expenses of repairs to City and Lewis for such Public Streets, Lewis should be deemed in conformance, to the extent provided hereto, with the provisions of Ordinance No. q30 as it may apply to the asphalt capping of the Public Streets within Terra Vista. NON, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in [his Agreement, Lewis and Ctty agree as follows: l l03 Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement Page 2 Conformance with Ordinance No 430. Lewis and City agree that due to the special circumstances referred to in Recitals C and D above, the application of Ordinance No. 430 to Terra Vista would be detrimental to both City and Lewis in that if all Public Streets were capped prior to the issuance of energy connections for all units within the first project adjacent to such Public Streets, the condition, appearance, and integrity of such Public Streets would be substantially compromised by utility trench cuts and the use of the heavy machinery and equipment that are essential for the development of other future projects adjacent to such Publfc Streets. The Parties concur that the costs of matntaining and repairing such Public Streets can be minimized by postponing the asphalt capping of such Public Streets until such time as all development adjacent to a particular segment of a Public Street as set forth below has been completed. As such, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, City deems Lewis to be in conformance with Ordinance No. 430 insofar as such ordinance applies to the asphalt capping of Publfc Streets required to be installed by Lewis in connection with the development of any particular project within Terra Vista. Lewis' Street Caooing Obligation. In conformance with Ordinance No. 430 with respect to the asphalt capping of the Public Streets required within Terra Vista, City and Lewis agree that the asphalt capping of such Public Streets shall be installed by Lewis as follows: (a) With respect to the Public Streets within Terra Vista that already have had the first lift installed as of the date of the City's execution of this agreement, which are designated by crass-hatch marks on Exhibit "R" attached hereto [specifically, Elm Avenue from its westerly intersection with Church Street to its easterly intersection with Church Street, Spruce Avenue between Town Center Drive and Elm Avenue, Mountain View Drive between Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and the east boundary of the Mountain View Apartments (Tract 12365), Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, and Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine P1 ace east to Milliken], Lewis shall install the asphalt capping for such Public Streets prior to issuance of energy connections for the final twenty percent (207.) of the units within the last project adjacent to each segment of the aforementioned Public Streets. for example, the segment of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Mountain Vtew Drive which borders Tentative Tracts 14420, 13304, 13272, and Parcel Map 12602 shall be capped only prior to issuance of energy connections for the final twenty percent (20X) of the units within the last of the four above-mentioned tracts to be developed, provided that the postponement of capping shall not exceed 2 years from the date of this Agreement. Subject to the City Engineer's annual review and aDPraval, the capping of such Public Streets may be postponed for three additional one-year periods. In any event, the capping of such Public Streets referred to fn this subparagraph 2(a) shall be installed by Lewis no later than August 1, 1996. Lewis agrees that prior to exoneration of the improvement security posted by it pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade 16.36.300, et seq., it will post adequate security to secure completion of the asphalt I In ~) Terra Vista Sheet Capping Agreement Page 3 capping for those sections of the Public Streets referred to in this subparagraph 2(a). The amount required by Section 16.36.320 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to secure installation of the capping of such Public Streets shall be based upon the engineer's estimate prepared for each segment referred to herein and approved by the City. Moreover, Lewis agrees that prior to the installation of the final lift of asphalt capping, the Public Street being capped shall be subject to inspection by the City Engineer and corrective or reconstructive work to the base pavement deemed reasonably necessary by the City Engineer will be completed prior to the installation of the final lift of asphalt capping of the Public Street. (b) The remainder of the Public Streets within Terra Yista, in which the first lift has not yet been installed, which are designated by the shaded areas on the attached Exhibit A [specifically, Church Street from its westerly intersection with Elm Avenue to its easterly intersection with Elm Avenue, Terra Vista Parkway between Mountain Ytew Orive and Churth Street, Churth Street between Orchard Avenue and Rochester Avenue, an east/west unnamed Public Street between Mountain Vfew Drive and Rochester Avenue, a north/south unnamed Public Street between the east/west unnamed Public Street and Church Street, Orchard Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street, and Poplar Drive between Church Street and Rochester Avenue] shall, like those in the above subparagraph 21a), be capped prior to issuance of energy connections for the final twenty percent (20%) of the units within the last project adjacent to each segment of the aforementioned Public Streets; provided that the term for time extensions and completion dates referred to in subparagraph 2(a) above shall not be applicable. However, it is agreed that none of the future Public Streets referred to in this subparagraph 2(b) shall remain uncapped for more than two (2) years (plus three (3) one-year extensions subject to the City Engineer's review and approval) after installation of the first lift of underlying street for each such Public Street. Lewis agrees that prior to exoneration of the improvement security posted by it pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 16.36.300, et seq., it wilt post adequate security to secure completion of the asphalt capping for those sections of the Public Streets referred to in this subparagraph 2(b). The amount required by Section 16.36.320 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to secure installation of the capping of such Public Streets shall be based upon the engineer's estimate prepared for each segment referred to herein and approved by the City. Moreover, Lewis agrees that prior to the Installation of the final lift of asphalt capping, the Public Street being capped shall be subject to inspection by the City Engineer and corrective or reconstructive work to the base pavement deemed reasonably necessary by the City Engineer wilt be completed prior to the installation of the final lift of asphalt tapping of the Public Street. 3. Effect of r m The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Agreement shall apply solely with respect to the application of Ordinance ~s Terra Vlste Street Capping Agreement Page 4 No. 430 to any project within Terra Vista which requires, as a condition of development, that Lewis install the Public Street segments referred to herein. This Agreement shall in no way affect, tmpatr, modify, or amend any other obligation incumbent upon Lewis pursuant to Ordinance No. 430 or of Lewis or City with respect to the Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. I dated June 7, 1984, between Lewis and City. 4. Default by Lewis. In the event of Lewis' default of this Agreement by virtue of its failure to install the capping of any required Public Street within the time frames referred to herein, City may (i) withhold issuance of energy connections for the final twenty percent (20X) of the last project adjacent to such segment of the required Public Street and (if) foreclose on the security posted by Lewis in connection with such asphalt capping and complete such capping on Lewis' behalf. 5. Amendments. No provision of this Agreement may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by City and Lewis. 6. Meroer. It is agreed that all understandings and agreements heretofore had between City and Lewis respecting the Installation of asphalt capping on the Public Streets wi?hin Terra Vista, including any condition of approval pertaining to such capping of Public Streets, are merged in this Agreement, which fully and completely expresses the agreement of City and Lewis. There are no representations, warranties, or agreements except as specifically and expressly set forth herein, or to the exhibits annexed hereto. 1. Attornevs' Fees. In the event of any action or proceeding brought by either Party against the other under this Agreement, the prevailing Pariy shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses including the actual fees of its attorneys incurred far prosecution, defense, consultation, or advice in such action or proceeding. 8. N~ yA gnsy. The Parties hereto are acting as independent entities and this Agreement shall not constitute a partnership, agency, or other business relationship between them. 9. lnteroretatton. Each of the Parties hereto has agreed to the use of the particular language of the provisions of this Agreement, and any questions of doubtful tnterpretatton shall not be resolved by any rule of ~~~ Tana Vlata Street Capping Agreement Page 5 interpretation providing for interpretation against the Party who caused the uncertainty to exist or against the drafter. IN NITNESS NHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective on the date herein provided. "Lewis" LENIS DEVELOPMENT CO., a California gener / partnership Its Authorized Agent "City" City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: ayor LENIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, a California general partnership By: ....~~~.~ Its uthorize gent NESTERN LANO PROPERTIES, a California limfted partnershfp By: LENIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP., a California corporation General Partner By: 4kktJ J M. Goo man for Yice President JMM:gkq\9e1\iV.C Attest: ty C er Dated: 11 I 0 o a z ~ ~ ~rJo a C' ~_ ~.~ as "_~ °g~ ~~~~ _ .- ~~ ~ a a o ~ ~~~ ~,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~~/ ~: 8 ~ ~ ~ Jtl as e a ; ~~ a ~ < ... a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e .a ~ - ~gd ~ E ~ N s ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ LL~ ~_ ~~a 5 ~s z r $ w t ~ ry o ~ ~ d 3 ~ s ~8~9 ~ ~ / g ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ R" ~ 9 R ~$° t: i~ ~ J~ ¢q¢ ~ ~ ~_ _ ~ n ~ w F>~~~r ~~ E~•~ ~. ~ ~ .3; ~_~ F~ ' 6 "' HNM ~ lM1Y IWYN r CAllltll N ----- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAytONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector II~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%iENSION FOR TRACT 13566-3, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUMMIT AVENUE ~ AND SAN SEVAINE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CENTURY AMERICAN I RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Cauncll adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK6AOUM0/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of Lhe publ7c improvements for Tract 13566-3 were approved by the City Council on October 4, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f502,000 Labor and Material Bond: f251,000 The developer, Century American, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension an said improvement agreement. The economic slowdown has caused the developer to cease all construction during the last year; however, construction has resumed during the past month and will continue until all street Improvements are complete. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Oifice. Respectfully submitted, Nm. Joe O'Neil ~~~~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments RESOLUTION NO- ~' ~ - 3a 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION qND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 6, 1991, by Century Amerftan as deveioper, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,iunction with the development of said Tract 13566-3; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. _-f r ~ `1 D Century American October 21, 1991 Mr. Steve M. Gilliand Public Works Inspector CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Tract No. 13566-3 "Vintage Valley Estates" Dear Mr. Gilliand, in response to your letter, requesting either the completion of the improvements for the captioned project, or the submission of an "improvement agreement extension", we hereby submit the later and request a one year extension to complete all improvements as required by our "conditions of approval". With the subject project consisting of large lots, and "move-up" type homes, we have experienced the blunt of the real estate recession and sales are substantially off from our original predictions. As such, we are requesting the maximum amount of extension time allowed, as our lender is requiring our construction pace to parallel our sales absorption rate. The remaining items to be completed per our conditions of approval are as follows: - final completion of sewer system - final completion of water system - final completion of curb, gutter, and sidewalk - final completion of a.c. paving - final adjustment of all valves and manholes - final monumentation We have enclosed three (3) executed and notarized "improvement agreement extension" forms and our check in the amount of $251.00. Should you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Yours truly, Century American ~G . ~~ Ronald C. Metzler senior Vice President, General Manager ~ rni ,~ Amen,.m I'Li ai 'SC`I ., ¢dh r~nim Itrnr unr !nu ~,icun.i lLll• ~ an,~.rn ni olM1it -i~~--n 'inn -1 - ------ CITI' OF RAICHU CCCA~IOtiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 70: Mayor, and Members of the City Council ~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR CUP 88-18, AVENUED AND HIGNLAN SAVEN ~, HSUBMITTEDUEBYBE DIVERSIFIED ~ PROPERTIES COtwaANY j RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK910UND/AMALPSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Cup 88-18 were approved by the City Council on October 4, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Band: E124,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 62,000 The developer, Diversified Properties Company, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension an said improvement agreement. The developer Ts currently in the process of obtaining approval from Caltrans. Once the approval Ts obtained, the construction of the improvements will commence. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Wm. Joe O'Neil ~_~~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments RESOLUTION N0. q/.. 3 ~Cy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV iNG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ExTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 88-18 YIHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 6, 1991, by Diversified Properties Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally Located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and Subject to the terms thereof, is to be done Tn conjunction with the development of said CUP 88-18; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. Callfornia0herebyERres0oRlvesththat said Improveme t Agreeyment Exte sionuand said Improvement Security De and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. l ~13 ~~ 1~1 DR'E RSIFIED "' ~~ ", t '~^~ __' 1 SHOPPING ;..~ ;, CENTERS .. October 1, 1991 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement, CUP 88-18 Dear Mr. Gilliland, As requested in your letter dated September 17, 1991, enclosed are three executed Improvement Agreement Extension forms and a check for $251. We have been actively pursuing the approval of our plans by Cal Trance and anticipate resolution of our outstanding issues with them in the next six weeks. At that point, we will begin the improvements referenced by our Improvement Agreement. Please let me know iP you need any additional information. Sincerely, DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTERS ~~G ~~rr Ma L Rohrer Pro Manager MLR/rr cc: John O~Meara John Alshuler, Coast Realty Advisors Betty Miller, City of Rancho Cucamonga ~1~ 'nli~Red Htll A.2nve. Sane al9.PO&.a 9N %. Costa Nev. t'ddnmu vEfi:PdOA% Illb 9S :n51 CITY OF RANCHO CCC'AMONGA STAFF REPORT r., DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II - SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 11838, LOCATED ON THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, SUBMITTED BY THE NILLIAM LYON ' COMPANY I RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subj ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Parcel Map 11838 were approved by the City Council on October 5, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E608,000 Labor and Material Bond: f304,000 The developer, The N1111am Lyon Company, 1s requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said Improvement agreement 1n order to complete the improvements within the intersection of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane. The extension is necessary due to the delays that the City's contractor encountered 1n the same area; hence, N111fam Lyon was also del dyed. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Nm. Joe O'Neil ~~~ City Engineer NJO:SMG;sd Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~j .3a5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11838 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 6, 1991, by The W1111am Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Base Ltne Road and Victoria Park Lane; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such Improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and sub,fect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 11838; and WHEREAS, said improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified to said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~b j.,Y~N~eWILLIAM LVON~am~aacJr 4490 VON KARMAN. PO BO% 7520. NEVJPORi BEACH. GA 92658-7520 • (71!4)n83,3-3600 • FAX (714) 47b6601A1 LV ~, - ~'' Beptesber 30, 1991 C'IY L~, ,~ i Hr. Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector City of Aancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucaaonga, California 91729 Re: PH 11838 - Lakes North Village Center Dear Steve, Transsitted herewith are the ia4rovesent agreement extension Pons executed in triplicate and notarized as required. Ne are requesting a six (6) month extension becaux the City prevented our work Eros being co~pleud at the inurxetion of Baseline Road and Victoria Patk Lane due to the city's own construction delay on Baseline Road. Zf you have any questions regarding This miter, please don't hesitate to contact me at (714) 476-5220. Re~spe~gctfully, 1 ~ 2t ~.GL1ti'~ Lori Brown Purchaainq Inland Depire Division : 1b:0009CRC ce: ,ToM Hayes, Hughes Investsents l~~ REAL E51AiE DEVELO PMENi - ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~" DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ADJACENT TO TRACT I 13440 I RECOMMEMDIITION It 1s recommended that Council accept the landscaped pedestrian trail Into the City's maintained landscape system. The trail 1s associated with Tract 13440. BACK6ROBIDJAMALYSIS The Landscaped pedestrian trail is a condition of Tract 13440. The tract is located on the south side of Highland Avenue directly between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. The pedestrian trail is located on the west side of the tract and runs in a north/south manner. The trail is complete, and the landscape is established. Tract 13440 is being developed by J.P. Rhoades Development. Due to economic conditions, the developer's street improvements remain Incomplete; however, all conditioned landscape is complete and established. Therefore, it is being recanmended that Council accept the pedestrian trail Into the maintained system. Respectfully submlt`ep. Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd - CITY OF RAtiCHO Ci:CAbI0NG~1 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, CT ty Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pub17t Works Inspector [I~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13812 - ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN, LOCATED ON ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND gVENUE AND SUMMIT AVENUE RECOMMENWITION: The required storm drain improvements for Tract 13812 - Ettwanda Storm Drain have been completed in an acceptable manner, and tt 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of ;45,800, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f458,000. 811C1(6ROUMD/AWALV52 S Tract 13812 - Ettwanda Storm Drain - located on Etlwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue DEVELOPER: Matt Southern California 9035 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond f 45,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (458,000 Respectfully submitted, ~y Wm. Jae O'Neil C/// City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment ~1~ RESOLUTION N0. ~/ - ,~~tp A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13812 - ETINANOA STORM DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13812 - Etiwanda Storm Drain have been completed to the satlsfac ti on of the City Engineer; and kNEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work Ts hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. lgo - ---- - CITS' OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT -~-"' DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~I Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Yhn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111 and, Public Works Inspector I~T~~ ~, SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF LETTERS OF CREDIT AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13813, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE 900' SDUTH OF 19TH STREET {I RECq/EIpATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 13813 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit in the amount of 57,600, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit in the amount of 576,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13813 - located on the west side of Hellman Avenue 900' south of 19th Street DEVELOPER: William Perry Roofing 9111 Lomita Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee letter of Credit f 7,6W Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (76,000 Respectfully subnri-tsred, ~~~~~ Vim. Joe O'Neil ~~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~/ - 3~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 138I3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13813 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~Z Ste, SECURE SAVI~'GS S~~TK October 22, 1991 ~,., ~, r~ ~~, City of Rancho Cucamonga SO°00 Civic Cc7a~r Crive P.O. Bax 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Maintenance Letter of Credit Tract 13813 Attn: Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector Dear Sir: At the request of William Perry Roofing we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Authority to Pay Letter of Credit 891030951-2 in the maximum amount of 57,600 in lieu of a maintenance bond, This Irrevocable Authority to Pay expires December 1, 1992 in the United States of America. We hereby undertake that your drafts when drawn under the terms and conditions Of this Irrevocable Authority to Pay will be duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all drafts will bear a reference to our Irrevocable wuchoricy to Pay Leccer of Credit $910109 F.1-2. Yours ~ ry tr y J 1 F John R. Wil lnson President, CEO JRt:: cb cc: Irilliam Perry Roofing IlYlil AAiN .aK ~:~~il ind-i~~~n R,"nun. r,~~,_ri ;I~ r~. i;-e -- CITY OF RANCHO Ci;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~' ~` DATE: November 6, 1991 '~: T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pub17c Morks Inspector 1 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 88-46, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD RELOMIEMDATION: The required street improvements for CUP 88-46 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of 5231,300. BACKtltOUND/ANALYSIS CUP 88-46 - located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base line Road DEVELOPER: Park place Cucamonga 1851 E. FTrst Street, Suite 800 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5231,300 Respectfully submitt~eYd~,`G~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil (_/ ~~ City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~~' 3~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 88-46' AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 88-46 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion Ts required to be filed, certifying the work compiete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. l~s ---- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ ~j Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer j BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II `~~-- SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF LETTER OF CREDIT AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR OR 87-48, LOCATED DN THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET BETNEEN HELLMAN AVENUE pND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RECOIIENDATION: The required street improvements for DR 87-48 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit 1n the amount of f6,100. BAC¢atoulo/AlulLrsEs DR 87-48 -located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue DEVELOPER: Sabastlano Filpi 1294 Quince Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (Street) (6,100 Respectfully su LtedL/~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer MJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~/~ 3a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-48 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 87-48 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the CT ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 7s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. -81 - CITI' OF RAtiCHU Cl'CA~fOtiGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~~ DATE: November 6, 1991 l T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer =~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEh1ENTS, STORM GRAIN ' AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT N0. ''~ 90-008, LOCATED FROM WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE TO WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONGS AND AUTHORIZE THE 'i CITY ENGINEER TO FTLE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" i RECOMIENBATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Base Line Road Street Improvements, Storm Drain and Traffic Signals Improvement Prol ect as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 31,473,405.50 for one year, to be used as the Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 3736,702.75, 6 months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of f77,930.62, 35 days after approval of the final contract amount of E1,558,612.41. BACK6ROUKDjiVNALYSIS The subJect protect has been completed Tn accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on protect documentation, is E1,558,612.41 which includes 8 change orders for additional striping, miscellaneous permits, utility delays and signal modifications previously approved by council. Respectfully submitted, ~.\~~ ~~/C LC Wm• Joe O'Neil :/ ..ity Enyineer NJO:LRB:sd cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. /( - 3 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 7HE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS, STORM ORRIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNRLS, CONTRACT N0. 90-008, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NNEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for Base Line Road Street improvements, Storm Drain and Traffic Signals, Contract No. 90-008, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the C7ty Engineer is authorized to sign and fiie a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. IQG - - ---- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DgTE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~~7~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDC FOR TRACT 12643 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NETHERLANDS VIEN LOOP AT CALICO PEAK PLACE AND ANTLER PEAK COURT RECOMIENDATIOM It 1s recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROUNp/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and vrorkmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 511,800.00 Respectfully submitted, C~o~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy ----- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA ._~,,~y~, STAFF REPORT ~.~\ '=^ i ~~ ! DATE: November 6, 1991 I T0: Mayor, and Members of the C1ty Council ~ Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Vhn. Joe O'Ne11, City Engineer ~ BY: Steve M. G111iland, Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13556 ~ LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SIERRA CREST YIEN LOOP AT MT. HARVARD COURT AND MT. CAMBRIDGE COURT ! IIECOMIEIDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council authorize the C1ty Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANILLYS[S The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Reiease: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) =12,800.00 Respectfuily subotttted, 7p/ ~G~ ~ Vim. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy ------- CITT OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~_ DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspector~`~~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13557 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SIERRA CREST YIEN LOOP AT Mi. , SHERMAN COURT AND Mi• NAYERLY COURT. RECONNEMD11T10N It is recommended that the City Counc7l authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street Improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER; Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Or1ve Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f10,050.00 Respectfully s~ubmi~tted/, Nm. Joe O'Neii,_J City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy G - ----- CITY' OF RAtiCHO CI'CA~lOiVGA STAFF REPORT ! ,~ r- OATE: November 6, 1991 TD; Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BV: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Marks tnspecto j SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE 80N0 FOR TRACT 13650, LOCATED ON f THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEYARD ANO BAKER STREET ~ RECOMIENDIIilON 1t is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. 8J1C1160.0UND/AMALVSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and Lhe street Improvements remain free from defects Tn materials and workmanship, DEVELOPER: Northwood 1678 Nest Arrow Route, Suite 141 Upland, CA 9178fi Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 521,907 Respectfully submitted, ' Nm. Joe O'Neil ~~~ City Engineer WJO:5MG:sd -~ ----- CITY OF R.aNCHU Cl'CA~fOtiGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~, DATE: November 6, 1991 ~~ T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council I ~, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ' BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec to~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE 80ND FOR TRACT 13810, i LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD AT t RAM COURT RECONIENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUIID/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and rrorkmanship. DEVELOPER: Visnu Patel et al. 2026 E. Financial Nay P.0. Box 775 Glendora, CA 91740 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 517,445 Respectfully submitted, L/''Y' `/1 Wm. Joe O'Neil ~ 1~~ 1 City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd ------ CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; November 6, 1991 To- Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO CONFIRM CONTRIBUTION IN MEMORY OF CARYN DIIORIO RECOMMENDATION: Approve the designation of the Caryn Di Iorio Film and Lecture room in the future Central Park library. BACKGROUND: in 1986 Mc Jce Di Iorio contributed to the City's park fund $750,000. City officials at the time recognized his desire for a memorial to his daughter Caryn and asked that he provide input for an appropriate memorial at the future Central Park. ANALYSIS: Mr. Di lorio has indicated to the City what his family favors as a memorial designation. The Di Iorio family has suggested that the Film and Lecture room in the Central Park library be designated as a memorial to his daughter in consideration of his contribution. Res ectfully bmitted, ~~ ack Lam, A[CP City Manager ORDINANCE N0. 462 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTPY COUNCIL OF 'i7~ CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMJN('~, CALIPY)RNIA, APPFmVII~K> DEVE[AFIdFNf ODE AMENQ~II]Tf 91-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, Cl~Pl'II2 17.12, OF THE RANCHO CUCAPtJNGA MUNICIPAL ODE, Fr.'rnrtTanTING Ci.MPACP PARI~R; SPACES AND REDUCING 1}{E STANDARD SIZE PARI@IC SPACE 1b 9 FEET BY 16 FEET, AND PRICING F.IND.IN(,S IN SDPFOILP 7}@2DJF The City Council of the City of F<vicho Cticazronga doPS hereby ordain as follows: SECPION 1: Section 17.12.030. A.1. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to read in words an3 figures as follows: 1. Standard stall size: Each parking space shall consist of a rectangular area not less than 9 feet wide by 18.0 feet long. In measuring the lergtti of paving required for a parking space, allorance may be made for up to a 1-foot vehicle projection beyond the ~r or tine stop if such projection does not interfere with latdscaping or ps3e_strian use. All parking spaces shall have a vertical clearance of not less than 7.5 feet. ~8~ SECPION 2: Section 17.12.030.A.2. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to read in words and figures as follw's: 2. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support colunm, or other obstruction which interferes in any way with access to a motor vehicle, the space shall be a miliimum of 2 feet wider than otherwise required by this section. ~q~ ordinanr_e No. 462 page 2 SECTION 3: Section 17.12.030.0.3. of Qiapter 17.12 is hereby amPTM~~ to read in words and figures as follows: 3. T.io-way access driveways with ra parking shall be a minimmi of 24 feet, except 26 feet shall be provided where necessary for emsgency vehicle access. One-way access driveways with no parking shall be a mininwn of 12 fit. SECTION 4: Section 17.12.030. D.1. of Chapter 17.12 is herelry ame+ded to read in words atd figures as follows: 1. F23ch parking facility is designed with parking bay units. The size ar width of this unit is dependent on one- ar twlrrvray traffic and single- or double-loaded aisles. Use the follauinq table to determine the overall width of the parking bay design which is being used. The dimensions listed are the amamt necessary to contain parking stall depth and aisle width, wittwut overhang. Parallel parking may he petmitte3; ho«ever, it must not be rnunted as part of the ~+";red driveway width and must maintain 4 feet between spaces. Table 17.12.030.D - Ovexall Parking Day Width 30 Parking Angle (in degrees) 45 60 90 1. Aisle Width a. One-Way Traffic 12' 14' 18' 24' b. Two-way Traffic 20' 21' 22' 24' 2. Single-Inaded Day width One-Way Traffic a. Wall-to-Wall 28'4" 32'9" 37'10" 42'0" b. Overlap 24'8" 29'9" 35'9" 42'0" 3. Double-Ioaded Bay Width One-Way Traffic a. Wall-to-Wall 44'8" 51'6" 57'8" 60'0" b. Overlap 37'4" 45'6" 53'6" N/A a. single-loaded Bay Width '1WO-Way Traffic a. Wall-to--Wall 36'4" 39'9" 4l'10" 42'0" b. Overlap 37.'8" 36'9" 39'9" 42'0" 5. Oa~ble-Loaded Bay Width 7Wo-Way Traffic a. Wall-to-Wall 52'8" 58'G" 61'S" 60'0" b. Overlap 45'4" 52'6" 57'6" N/A ~'1 l Ordinance No. 462 Page 3 A =ANGLE G + AISLE WpTN O + SAY WpTN ONE-WAY SNiGLE LOADED WALLTO-WALL D + BAY WN)TN ONE-WAy SNNiLE LOADED OVERLAP E =BAY WpTN TWO-WAY DOIN)LE LOADED WAll~TO-WALL F = SAV WpTN TWO-WAY OOUOLE LOADED OVERLAP SfXR'ION 5: Section 17.12.030.D.3. of Chapter 17.12 is hereby deletes in its entirety and all subsequent sections renumbered ao.~n3irgly. SECI20N 6: Section 17.12.040.A.2. (h) of chapter 17.12 is hereby deleted in its entirety and all subsequent sections renlanbered aorordirgly. SEC'T'ION 7: Section 17.12.040. C.3. is hereby deleted in its entirety and all subsequent sections renumbered accordingly. SIXTION 8: Section 17.02.030.A.3. of (]w~7-=r 17.12 is hereby anplded to read in words and figure, as follows: Handicapped stall size: Each parking space designated for use by the handicapped shall consist of a rectangular area not less than 14 feet wide by 18 feet long, and shall be located in an area not exceeding 2 percent slope. All spaces shall be located near of comrenient to a level or ranged entrance not exceeding a 5 percent slope, to the facility served by the parking space. Parking spaces for the harclicapped shall be signed and restricted for use by the handicapped only. lqB Ordirance No. 462 Page 4 •hCC~ :~ ~fYwa.., ~ s •r. . w.roT ~F YY~~ ~U'M • y ~ Z'i~~ p ~ 1 ..pro ~ + Y ~ ~ ~ e '~ / !' Wy ~~ ~ 0.v~~1 }~ci ~ ~'~'~• ~}. y+vwnau~ %WIDIUp'Pl!p AT7~l,l, a~E SFXTION 9: This Council finds that this amendnpnt will not adversely affect the envirorurent and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 10: 1fie City Cauicil declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance 6e rendered ar declared invalid by any final cant action in a crourt of caipetent jurisdiction, ar by reason of any pree~tive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 3ECI'l~J 11: the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to to published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Wily Bullet' , a newspaper of general cirwlation published in the City of Ontario, California, aryl circulated in the City of Rancho cticamorxTa, California. 1 °~9 OFDINANCE NO. 463 AN ORDINANCE OF Il1E CPfY CODPICIL OF `Ifs CPPY OF RANG CUCANXRIGA., CAISEORMIA, APPROVING ITlWS1R2IAL SPEICIFIC PIAN AMII~IIITP 91-O1, ELI.MINH1'ING OCf~ACf PAR[QNG SPACES, AND MAKD7G FIl4DINGS IN SUPPOKi' 'ifII~RFAF 'fie City Camcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does Irseby ordain as follows: SDCEION 1: Part III, Section F.6 is hereby deleted in its entirety and all subsegixnt sections renumbered an-ordirgly. SDCPION 2: This Camcil fiids that this ameidtmnt Will not adversely affect the envirotunent and herelry issues a Negative Declaration. SEXTION 3: The City Council declares that, should arty provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Orditanoe be rendered cff declared invalid by airy final cair't action in a e~nt of crnq~etent jurisdio- tion, or by reason of any preenQtive legislation, the ran3inity provisions, sections, paragraphs, senTPnces, and words of this Ordinance shall retain in full force and effect. SE7Ci'ION 4: 'Ihe Mayor shall sign this Oxtlirance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after its at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, arcl circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamronga, California. 0200 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 - TO: Mayor and Nembere of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Hrad Bu Llerr City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SOBJ ECT: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSID ADOPTION, HY REFERENCE OF SAN BE RNARDINO COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3349 AS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OP SUPERVISORS OP TBE COUNTY OP SAN BERNA RO LNO PERTAINING TO T7ifi VEHICLE ABATBMENT AND REMOVAL PROGAAN OF TBE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO REODNDl2IUATIO~: The City Council should give tire[ reading of the tl tie of the attached Ordinance and conduct n public hearing to consider the adoption, by reference, of County Ordinance No. 3349 ^Veh icle Abatement and Removal Program". BAAIR:IORID: Ac the October 2, 1991 vesting, the City Council approved participation in the San Bernardino County Vehicle Aba raver.[ program. The City Council also gave preliminary reading of the title of the attached ordinance, and set the same for public hearing at the November 6, 1991 meeting. Adoption of the County Ordinance, by reference, is necessary to enable the County to operate their Vehicle Abatement Program within the City. The County ordinance hoe been reviewed by the City Attorney, and approved as to form and content. COBCfO320~: The City Council has approved participation in the County Vehicle Abatement Program. Adoption of County Ordinance No. 3349, by reference, ie necessary to facilitate the implementation of the program within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Adoption of County Ordinance No. 3349, by reference, would therefore be appropriate. Res ull d, Brad le City lanner BB: RLA Attachments: Exhibit "A" - October 2, 1991 Staff Report Exhibit "B" - September 4, 1991 3tefE Report Exhibit 'C" - County Ordinance No. 3349 City Council Ordinance Adopting County Ordinance No. 3349, ^By Reference" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 2, 1991 T0: Mayor and Hambere of the Clty Council Jack Lam, AICP, city Nanagar FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Coda Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: R T nv rnumsar_r wr~rw THE COONTY OP SAN BERNAADINO FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY'S VEHICLE AHATBHEN7 PROGRAM A nOPTION OF COUNTY ORDINANCE 13349 HY ~FEPPNCE RECONNLNDATION The City Council should approve the City'a participation in the San Bernardino County Vehicle Abatement Program, glue preliminary reading of the title of the attached Ordinance, end act the same for public hearing at the November 6, 1991 City Council Meeting. SACEOROUND At the September 4, 1991 meeting, the City council coneldered participation in the Sen Bernardino County Vehicle Abetament Program. The City Council directed staff to proceed with the necessary actions to initiate Chia contract service. Tha attached contract and County ordinance have been reviewed by the Ciiy Attorney, and approved ae to their form and Content. Staff hat mat wish repreoentat Sues of the County Department of Bnvironmental Health and eetabliohed guidaLinea for the potentisl implementation and operet icn of the program. Adoption of the County Ordinance, by vference, So necauary to enable the county to operate the program within Lha Clty. County Ordinance 13349 ie eLmilar to the City•• vehicle abatement ordinance Ln that they are both beeed on the authority granted by the California Vehicle code. The county Ordinance i• somewhat more comprehenoiva, however, in providing proceduta• for the removal of abandoned vehicles on private property in addition to inaperat ive vehieleo. Tha County'• Ordinance also autllnee, in much greater detail, the process of diapoaition of ebatad vehieleo. Adopt Lon of the county Ordinance, by reference, will permit the county to operate the Abateman[ Program within the City, but will not lnterEete with currant City regu let LOn~ or enforcement procedures. ~XNi~i7" /-~ CITY COUNCIL STAFP REPORT County Vehlcls Abateioeni Program October 2, 1991 Page 2 CONCLUSION: The City i• already paying !or a portion of the County Vehicle Abatement program through "tipping" face, and will continua to pay whether or not the City participate. Vehicle abatement it an extremely ueeful tool used by Code 8nlorcamant to resolve probla4a in the City, and the County program would enhance tM value of this tool. The City Council hae previously expressed their desire tv partlvipate in the program. Approval of the contract and adopt Lon of County Ordinance /3349, by refsrenp, would therefore be appropriate. Aeepect lly submitted, bra lar City Planner Be: RLA:e Attachments: Exhibit "A" - September 4, 1991 Staff Aeport Exhibit "B^ - Proposed Contract Exhibit "C^ - County Ordinance /3349 Exhibit "O" - Propo wd Ordinance Adopting County Ordinance /3399 ^Ey ReLrence" ao~ C [TY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 4, 3991 TO: Mayor and Hambar• of the City Cwuncll Jaek Lam, AICP, Ciry Manager FROH: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Entoreemant SupsrvLaoz sossecT: co 0 v AUTHORITY RLCOMl2AN1ATION: The City Ceunc ll should eonelder the following inCormatlon concerning the Clty•• participation in tAe San Bernardino County Vehicl• Abatement Ptogram, and it dulred, N3eet a nominee to serve on ens Ban Sernerd ino County AAandonod Vah iris Abatement Service Authority. BACRdROVNbt Tha County of Ban Sernerdlno hu appeoached tho Clty to eolictt participation in a County operated Vehicl• Abatemene program. The program, funded by ^tippLng^ feu alrudy colloctad by tM County Eoe cefue• diepo+el, would r+qu Lre ne addit lanai monetary cmntcibution by the City for partieipat Lon. Upon review of the inltiel propoul, SG tt quaat coned whether tM Cley could dwelap L[• own program and taolve a port ton of the County ^tipping" fees directly, Ln lieu o[ parilcipat fan in the County Program. rollouing reuacch m detarnlne t[ funding could ba diverted dinetly to the Clty, LC was utabl Llhed that the "t Lppinq" fees dealgnaud Car vahlcl• abatement could only be uud to Lund the County program. In addition, the panage of Auemb ly Bill 4114 now allows the County, in cooperation with citiu, to develop a Service Authority that weuld 6a eligLbl• to raceLVe addLtlanal Lunde from tM State of Cal Lfocnla for the opernt Lan oC a Vehicle Abatement Program. Again, Lndlvldual cities are not •ligi6le Lor those additional tondo. ANALxsIS: Through tipping Naa, the City i• already pay ing Eor a portion of the County Vehicl• Abatement Program, and will eontlnue to pay ragardl u• oC direct part iclpat Lon. Vehicle abatement Ls an ezt remely useful tool used by Coda Enforcement to raw lva prob lame in tN City. Parris Lpat ion in CM cpuney program should Smprove •fl LClancy and der cetaa [h• emaunt of staff time requ lred to process vehicle City Council Staff Report Sept embeY d, 1991 Pa9a 3 abatement saws. Staff elves paztieipaCion in the program as a way of improving an existing entor cement tool. Tha set ablishment of a Service Authority In eoaperat ton with the County and other cities will provide a new avenue fat funding. VeDlrle Abaleeeat Peoaro: Under contract, when an inoperative, wrecked, or ebantloned vehicle i• requ teed to be removed from ptivat• property, the County would provlda s complete service for legal noL if is ation to the vehicle and property owners end the physical removal end final diepasition of the vehicle. City staff would remain in control o[ the mtoresment proceu, Lntludinq identification of violaCic ne and the initial notif teat Lon Co the rssitlent or property owner, in order to seek voluntary compliance. The proposed County progrem would take over at the et art of Lhe actual abet emeni pioceu. Our Code Enforcement staff would continua to conduct the compliance inspect lone, and, when needed, supecvise the removal of a vehicle by a County contractor. Uw of the County program would immediately produce a savings of up to $100.00 par vehicle, in towing fees. In edtlliion, then would be s eubsiantlal uvings in atntt time required to procua legal nCticu and ins tlisposit ion of vehicle• abaud by the Ciiy. ser~ic• Authorit+, Msembly Bill 4136 allCwe counties to form devise author it ie• for the abatement of abandoned vahiclw, and to impow a $1 vehicle registration fN for all vehicles within Che county. Tha fees collected would be deposited In the Abandoned VehicL Trust Fund, which this bill creates, and would be continuously epproprLatsd for allocation by the State ConeraLler to rand local vehicle abatement programs. The creation of t Service Authority will complement both the County and City vehicle abatement pcogruas Dy providing additional funtllnq for complaint invutigation and vehicle towing. The County Board of Supervisors, and a majority of the cities within the County must approve reaolut tons establ ishinq the San Bernardino Cou hey Abandoned Vehicle Abatement (Service) Authority. The County department of Envlronmsntal xaalih Services will hs request inq iha Clty Council to approve taco a reeolut ton in ens neer tuture~ The Service Authority will be administered by a five msmbe: Board of pirecCOre, with two members npreesnt inq tM unincorporaNd County areas, and three members ceprauntinq the eitiu, (one each from the We et Valley, the bast Valley, sod tM Mountain/Dewrt ones(. bs City Counc Ll Staff Rapor[ SaptaniDer 4, 1991 Pages 3 At [hair Saptamber 1991 meatinq, the Solid waste Advisory Tuk Porp (of which Councilman Alexander i• a member) will be oletlnq thrq members and these altecnatu for recoomendation to the Board of Supervisors u rapruentativa• far the incorporated cltiu. The Tuk ioree will be mekinq their selection tress nominees rscommandal by various ctiy eounclls. Nominees may W electal official oz Clty employau. CoNCLBN ION: Staff racammenda participat Lon In [he County VMicle Abatement program. Tha proposal county Contract and associated ordinaneu era currant Ly under review 6y the City Attorney and staff. it the city Council concurs with thl approach, this contract wlli be brought before the Ciiy Council at GM CctoWr 2, 1991 mNtinq. The development of a county Vehicle Abatement Service Authority i• also progreuinq quickly. it the City Council wishes to participate, the Clay representat lve should W seleted to carve an the Service Aut horityr and that name should then M foswardal to tM Solid Wute Advisory Taek [ores (SWAT[). Minute aelion is all thaC le nsalal at Lni. time. Ru ally s tte ern er city sneer BB:RLA:na Att acMmts: Letbr of Auquet 23, 1993, res Assembly SL11 4114 elil Text - AS 4116 Draf[ County Resolution to Establ lh Service Authority ~u~ e~` uP~p"'.^? l~~~SLLtF.: +.. Pt::::::" ~::: ORDI?A?CE S0. JN9 AN ORDI\A]CE OF THE COLSTY OF SAN BEP WRDIND, STATF OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CXAPTEP I1 TO DIVISION J OF TITLE J OF THE SAV BERn'ARDINO COCNTY CODE. PERTAINING TO ABATEMENT A1:D RENO\'AL OF D'1\L~NTLED. WRECKED. INOPE0.ATI\'E, T HEREOF. EP RO\101?G P o EpL FESEFOR E~FORC6 hIENT n~0 ADfL?ISTRATION AND PROVIDING OTHER REOILATI095 CONCERNING VEHICLES. Tnn Board of S:p<n~~IOrwf Ih<Counry of San Bvnardino. Suu Of CIIIferNl, olCLnl <CC4 feller f: Berm tl ool~o nlrJ Cpadvlrt Ivlnend dr. ric n>'0 of Title J of IA< San Chmnr 12 VEHICLE ABATEMENT A9D REMOVAL PROGRAM Secllam: ll.I3I Awhontc 1] L'! D<Lmuom 11.1310 Pubbc Nuiun<et. 11.1311 EactDllont. ]) 1730 Chapter lupplemem to Eainint La+. 1J G! Prpluened Ltn. 111310 Dug m Amla 11.1111 Emegenry Aenemem red Other Sm Tat. JJ.I SeO Abu<menl Pro<edurv for Venicin u'bch w Pveb< Nuiuna, h ~ ll.l b1 Pgmenl for Abnemem pf Vthi<lea W'hah ue a ~ . ~ Public Nwuna. f 1] li!B Appnh pf nmamml. . ra ` ~ ll li!S nppeill of Cnupt. o 11.1360 Canaliauon OfCMnet. 1J.1]6f Prpadure for Rdund o/ Prymmt. ~ ~ 1].1110 Pgmml for Abnemty of Abandoned V<hi<Iea. ( ' d~ 11.1311 of V<Nda N'hlcA m a Pvblie Pt- o x a e L ~ 11.1310 Amummt Prxedvru for V<hi<IO Which ve Abmdpn<d. 11.1311 Abuemm: Pro«duro for Abmdoned Venitlef W'3och are Vilwd a Greuer Nm S)00. 1J.ISU Pratdure for RedemDlion of Vehidn. ll u90 AmhorGGaupn w Enlorce Counp~ Code and Velpd< Code ProNtiont. 11.1395 Dvamin,uen of Enimued Value pl Venide. 11 1391 Cnminu Prpallio, 11.1199 Inlunalen. 11.1 11 Aulho rll•. toil 10 1 veM1l<Ie or DW IhereOL l0 oblun m(onnulon at IO Iht idtnnry of .ehnle and rempve or note Ine removal of a vebdt of Wrt Iherml eeclue0 to be a nmunre. IDI Ant person Inrerinm{ ntn er refmint entry m gropers Io any coumy d conu,ptd temu tmploYee performint dvuu under tbt chapur shall be rviny of a mitdemunor and, upon urm tnd mnvinion. thW be punMW Dy a foe nDl m non of five bundrtd dolbn IS100L and Impmonmem of not more IMn umlY 1901 dayr, or Ddn. Tht mdudn W urnnpu to mneM, rempve d IelOalt vehltl n Ine pmn of or donor IM abnemml and removal Drxeu by In CounlY andror m comnnort. J1.II3 Dennitlom. Far the purpotet of INt cMpur, unleu other+ite aD W rem frpm the conlnr, yyh~~n cud In Ihu empla ue depned n folle.c n1 "A bmapMa atblcir tbul ee a vtmde +Man n locoed on public or pnvale Dloptny rnhod the apre0 or Impbed epnwm of Ine progeny o+ner or Cerwn In Ira (ul Dovewon or convol of Ine progeny. NI "Admmulnuve bond" tha11 d a bpdY appolmed DY the direeor to ne4 aDDOh under Ibt chapnr and tha11 ronuu of IMn fJ1 p<rmnt. KI "DEHS"IMn bt lh<Oepu:mml of EnrvonmenulHal:n Serncn of :h< CppOn' of San Ber na: drop Idl "Dinnor" mall be the pvenor of Ine D<pn mml of fmiranmmul HPllh 9enim of Int Ceuny of San Bermrdme (el "Drlmanl!ed" tMll m n Inn rNnpal com Der.<m porn nenuan w Openm Inrvemtle po ~ hitMq, rpad+,. or puebc unn n,v ban rtmovd from rot ven¢:e. If) "Fei'tnill b<mY Unoum of manq UUled. toed. or pod Io DEHS reboot l0 the dmlmuoo•t md•pr mforcemem mur In rrcd (or Ine DprDme of mfprmnt Ihu cha Cler. cu 11) "InpD<rabl[' Chill mean the ucMch a abun; ,moron. 1!intNr410 n, uhRr Or NY Orn[: PLI Of rq U:Dm <nl nRnYf)' 10 OP[la:< ufeh on a nph•ry, road+aJ pr pupl¢ nren. Ihl "tors Y<d" Uill mun a whale +hah Mt been deuro3<d or damyed to wGh ,n amm :bar n it norvePunble. (il "L¢n ul<" mill mean , uIt of, veMne to oNaln Igal . nennm of , vemae under ml< or n9mnnt r<tn:nlwa undo me Cudorma vemne coat, G1 "0+m<r''mW De my perwnor enulr nnmtdryuer nthapl utu in ,nY personal prppenY or real DmpenY mbjs<I m Ine Drprmom of Imo cMger. (k) "O+ner o! mt veMrie" Mill b< the tart rrtiturtd a+n<r ,na letil o+nrr er rttena. fry "Pawn" mAvdn a natural Amon, fvm, mD+nnennp. uwnnion, or corpvralipn. Iml "Pd•ue peopenY" Ihall bt Dropeny owned D)' ,person other Ihm a pveliG mwy. (N "poetic prepenl'~thail De pmlxT O+nedMaPVebc mmy. (ol "Linmed diamantl<r't Jvd" N,II bt Dremun uwd for ditmamlint or rrttYint of veM<In, vhne mere it euNnp adlint or d<allnt in tuck veniclea. Intir imgral p,m, pr mmpmml mnenab Utreol, and IAr We of dnm,ntled, p,nnlly dummded. +ueY<a or inoptrnive v<Nelea, fPl 'ROad+aY" abut man Ihu ponion of a hith+q •hicA 'a imprpnd, doitnsd or ordinarily ur<d for v<hrtvlu va•d, indudmt impro•ed thpuldsn. fRl "Umumdad veMde"tnW be aveNd<for NGh Usr'vmnd driver rnpomlbH !or Ue umt is net +ithin ,n audlDl< dnunce and Itl "N ltctt0" mYl mtm w mGn m u1ml Ua it it oNY u m repair. m Of Drirne and OvbD< prOpen)'. l0 pmmole blltnl and dnenOnllen. In'nlt pYndtMF. 10 Cftalt fiR nWrdt, 10 <Ont11101t an alirapll•< nYlHnd ROINF a hFLrd IOlht Dea14h and Yfn)' Of INnerL 10 n<Jlt a hubonte Id rpdmu tnd btmle and to De inlunaut m tM heahn, ufay and t<nenl relfue ohhe public. Therefore, Ine promo of tDYldOn<d, GmNJed. inOpenavq IY11Y<d W +!<ettd •eNdet Or pNt Ihnepf on Dnvne or pub 11 a praRnY lolh<r Than on undo. Dubhc uta of San Bernvdino CnuntY ncepl n npreny~ permmed In rnu y cMplu.udMVed to mmlpmea pubDCnmunce+NCn mar be ammo u ouch in acprdmce rem Ut providom of Ihu cMDlo. 11.11IS Fanplloen. Thu cmgn Uali rem aDDIY m,nY vehicle or pane Ihereef +MGh d It mmplnelYeltdoted+nWnabuildinlmmuunt of four l0 •alh and t roofinalaaful m,nnn,+'here mch vehicle it opt vibble from lnaTren or other DuDlic or pnvale progny or a vehicle or Pam Inenef •M<h it cored or Darted m • luful mmner on DropenY m<a m <onnenron wlh Iht bmrMU of • licemed difmmtleb wale, •<Mde dnln or jwYYVd. TNt acepupn anall noI avlhanu the mumenmce of a pubbc or pda¢ nuiunce as deRmd under the provivom of la+ omen IMn thn chaDler. 111110 CMptrr Suppkmml l9 Ednlnt V+. TMa eMpler a red the ndutne ryulwon pf tbmdoned. ditmmtlt0. Inpperlfivl, lunltd or aeYed v<nwln pr Dam Ih<reof, or Ovblic nvnmc<t +nhln the Caumy h Ihtil mOplemev and De m addman to Ut oNe retunory Wet, mmin and orduunut nnnafou 2 ~1 EXNi3iT- (? or hereahn aaa:C Dt '. n<Our.q, :ne Suva err ap) nee leaal:m:q ll.1::3 Pro Ne:«d lur. An)' abandoned, dfmand<e, :noPcram e, Iur.keC or •: akd •ehcln m gam vy scot, or Imo or pan.aiy doatf:a Dlcd •<A:Ce Lndud:nt •<b<::f ~::now hood, fadp6 o.e,nef, bodl ;arr.f. huC~ t'.u.:rurk.4 •`ccq. °~nEC+r cr •'mev:ncep +nn plac<e ]r ir]+L and u:b < f: a- rr.r;:ra •: ; •:G of :ana agar ..::c1 wch a or art kqt. r+ Droh:prod ao. cons:au;o a vo:auen o/:hu :ha D:e-.. )7.u)o Dm. Ia Amu. Np xnon La.l :a_«. prmn, -arnta:n, condo[: or p:herv u< d;o+' v uudeoeC, ir..ua :!. ~ncP<:e,n e, ;ptted. or w: nkcd •cE:cle or pane Ib;reof :o De open;p s:ond, n:h:e :h. f<•]mwryo;a<d a; ea of9an BUrardmo COUC:Y lubad DC^s d.,.o Do+ner, andror o:ap,m.'.r. ae•.n: of aa• 'and'o«md ur;[~.:ne umrtorDOraee area of San Br, nuGno Caucl :p : <mov a am:e, a.:C D«wm :hc rc:':r, eece of open norge of rvch • veh;le. Am wet -m« of such conGUaa of a rpr:fnxmCe pit :hc um<D: op<.^.. mAyh Cnecd a tom:nw:ion of :h[ onpnal womuon one add::rDnal noufVapon «pwr<mma unea f A.1 Sao ana f )1. L90 shW not be repmred. ]].1175 Emer{rnq' ADUem<m and Olher S<Nat. Ial Emaeenp obit rr. ua. wb.m a ~<h:cle ec P.ncd by thin mama as a Dubhc nwnnce :om:uu:ef an:mm<duu hoard or iMen pf harm one :he nmuron «Ils for abuem<m soontt than the abaement pracedum harm allow, DEHS. :A< Dve:mr of Transponanon, or Shadit D<Parm<m mry ukr or awe cme: Rnq' rema•d o/ such nwunc<wnh mch noun tp Dan:m concerned, or wnhow noticq u th[ panicuiu cn:ums;an«t rnsanably allow. Repuiree noufi«uon prmedura ppoor :a deposal of wch •en¢!HSl rhdl De followed. (01 Rqucn for e^ re if any mmeer of :he pubbc, ncgt velM1nora{e opanpn. ; ryuesn DEHS rn wnpnl to r<mov[ abandoned, r~ ~ <ov'at all DEHS coin. The remo•ed abandonetl, dumanJed. {- ~ :. inoperauv<, lurked or w«cked v[hrtlef or Dw Ihneaf. Ihmu{h <-;u r f vamfer of utl<or lien ul< Dram Ntll Oerome IA<proDenY of San ~ - ., > Banudino Caunry and wch w]II b<the rnponsibdity of the Counry to dispose of acordrn{ w hw, ~:+.~ (q CompWnu. DEHS wlllimmyV<anon>'mow campldnu usonuN w]Ih abandoned, dismantled. ino«nuve• Iurlked or wT¢ted veh¢la or Dvu :he«of. ihr comD:amt mq' De phoned in or D<:n `', wnunl and muss Aeve n:us addren and/or annwr goal number wilt adewnpuon o(:he •]olnma The Dr«<u re!emnl to ^NOVi«ofimmt m Abae and Remove" wail De m:iued (or abaemmt J wch is determined ro b<apDropnne. )].1110 Abnemeu Prxedura for V<hidn N'M<a m a Public huWace. A lenday "NOUa of Imem la Abue and Remove" shW be Oven Ie the Dwperty aumer w remove the vehitle err veNdn err ptni Ihawf. .,,,new nolunce. unlos Ih<mopenY o+ma rod the ownn of the v<hr<i< hive u{ned rtlenn amhonpn{ remove tea wnvy runner imeren in the •ebcle or pan thereof. Nan~«ppn shill be peen either py penond delrvtty or poem{ :ht progeny, and {hall b< mdl[d Dy repnered or «ndmd mul addrnted to the DropenY owner at Ms/her Iw tnown bonito/ or rnldmce addmt u IAe tune aDDran m the pubbc records of Ih< Ian eavaheed ufeummt roll, and ro IAe Ian rgmered and'or Iqd owner al Ih< vehicle Dy rgmend err «nrfed mui to Inc Iw addreu hued wuh the Depanmem of Molar Vehicles. not a ubble w<dnnmrnehewnenl:Ip,InoU<ecneed cot b< puce to the Ian npne« d ane/pr Ie1{I o+nn of IM •<hml< The nobu shall be mbpmudly a fo0an: "You u<h<reby noufed m oboe INS pubbc nuisance M removal of th.. <haFersl or Dani.ev foul rp der w~Ih1<loubl c nuwnu • d Iwch w{ether +nh adm:nnl n::ve tofu, mq' De wmtp to me «pI a+ner of m< land on wh¢h the DuDI¢ nuwnc<md fuch dummded, junYed. a0mdoned, mopenuv< nhale er pain IAneof rte loured." Tht nonce shill abo ut faith Iht Dr«edura end um<Pmod for filly an +OD<al. TM nau:<fNil conwn a nu<mem of the boon{ ri{hu of the owner o! the prop<rtY on whnh the vehicle rt loumd an0 ! rh< ow brr of :h< • ehrcl< TM wlemml tMll mdude naua ro the proDenY o+ner the henht ma) appear rn perwn u • beano{ or may rubmn • (worn fuumm: denyln{ «spontibdnY for IM preun« olfhe rth¢le on Iht land. w:;h bit/her «upm !pr wch Oenul, m lieu of appeann{. If :nc r:',u nc r ur m e arA a ~:: - ' bae ««:•e' ~.'• • 'M1< :Im< Dc:aC V•<n .n site ne.a:. ~EnS ~: aulilanxe] IC a: a'.r •• ~-.unit A "VCI::[<!:] ::{o Abair l:Id RtmO•<"mall nCl [e'!~. •• ' C~ai Ofa•cb::CO: 'r i::f :b '[Claw fh :r ',nC^<rib[: ] :I:<amence pfam>:or.:nmm:umn~or +nau one :nrapn.rlr an' :o+ed: o •'ah:<d a lov :pan :wo bait Grd dolBn 5:00'" _ i deam:v<d :p b< a ~uY:r nmunx Crefen:mt an :m.m:d:a: c :` c D':bPC p.ea::n or u.en. Dro•r_:d :bn 's.e; o;a:p avee: hn ~r:: ald~ueau `tr,t.e~ „e ndw {'n :•^e In <', or .a'ha<o'.\o o r<d:D d. po¢C re •<`~, o :, pualraDF •thad or.it aDDI> :a mepaable ~<F~Jn to«¢d upon a ;ar:n :;a; s a:ha tarmd fat apn«Imvl uu or a noI :rn;m•C u:v. a m:deapal uruc: e:c can:a;mnt :e or aon dwdl:ee :a::+ ?'aria shd; De V•m to Ne Depanmcm o! Vpmr t'<!a J.n within five UI days afmr :h<Ca« o/removal a( v<h¢le undenluv wn:nr., :denufYrnNM ~<.:r.:e s An:hceof and ar.> <v iCnc[:f m:'seu:: r. vulablq mduGn{, but WI Wumd lo, the repsvarpn mC, ccm^u:es of o+'n<nND, or lime palef. So •Mrk+L'cn Ns bon /baud yr ttmo• rd a• a ppbi.: n• •i: :: rbcA pa W fn for nIh<r Aaneleu eunal~ice-IU Dh:u or ::utoncal vehal< license plain. San 9<: oud:no Counrv DENS anC/m canman stoic! ual: -s De liabl<(or damge cauud la a veNCl<or Dan men( D. :<mavat pursuant to tha «ellon. 77.13/5 Pnmmt for Abmmenl of \ehiclet N'hich ue a PYbllf emd<r Io the An Bernardino Counq' Audrmn COnV aa[r an ccm. •a<ment covennt +ork nnaury for me abn<ment. The And Comrolle~sball iay the um[ from Ih; (ands of :h[ alenq [/coot .. _. .. nn A tAe Eieener Illal efa[nt 10Iht mOPtny J' :onvolla the remdnin{ unpud cert. Th[ AudnodCOnaoau vhdl awe th<emeum of the amt w D<mte; ed upon the Hen wc:«d:y '/moil Iu roll. TD<roher, Ih< unounu of the anntmmr vhaf. De :ollntM n the tame time and m the tune manner a CountY:ua ue :olimed, and unugen lp the amt pmWia and the nme Proc<durc and nl[ in cue o. d<hnRUtn<y a grounded for ordwq bcary :ua. ocept that if my rd DropmY Io wNCh mch hen would auto nos xen Irann<rred or eonvsy[d to .eon. rat Du«hutt !or salve, or f a Tien of a boy file eneumb«nett for value .:at enn nosed and uuehed Iherepn, poor to Ih< dot on +'NM the fro nu;al6men: of rvch tun would Dnem< d<linauem, then the lim wA:ch would xhsnin De imposed by tNt fcuon thW nu ouch to mch real DroDc^.f Nd Iht torn D( tbaltmmt, n <on(rmtd, r[Ialln{ tp mc:: DrCpC:)' shill M emderted to ta+nefrttit the Gme of the yen funmt ht Dann who ru t0< DropaiY 57.1350 Appad o/ Abuenenf. ^pon wnum rwum by tha Itpl a+ma of the v<h¢I<under sole or rep Inn{ repurnion under Ih[ Cahforma V<h¢le Code, «cn~ed by the DEHS+n(Nn nn U%dap afar mdhn{ of the h'apce pf Inua: to Abne and Remove, or a Horn wnurn tunm<m from site pv Her of dIe IoW. davmnt nowmpousDdity for Ih<veNdelsl, a DYbDC hrannt thW be Add DyeM Admiuftrwve Spud on Ne tba:emenl and rr. Dvd of wch v<hiddsl and pw Ihereo(u a pubbc nuuan:e The rvorr. wnnen Nt<mml shW be eamrvN u • reRUm for heu:nt+b+ct don not rtRmre the prevnn of Ne owner mDtuuinl such reaues: T`s Adminuvauve Board shill Mar and an on aDpedf +]IMn uan ~eCl dap of flan{ and its dnammauon sM0 De contlufrve. The o+ner t! the boil on wMCh :M veA¢le a loused maY aDDUr m Person r. •r< beano{, or Drnml r twprn wnnen unemem Oenpnl rnppmawq for the Prnence of the v<h:de on the land. +nh hu%ha anon 'cr rvch deNL. If n it daermined a the Mann{ tMl tn<v<bae wu ; a: <d en tM land wnlhom the ronnm of the bndo+ner +nd Ina ha site -av opt wbtmumtly ac0vinetd in Its Dram, Then :he foul amnr~'• shall not area the eons of edmmuvwan or rempvd of me .<:.: e e{aim) the prop<nY upon which the vehicle a lo<nea or p:hr•'f< wemDl to :oGect tuck can from wch o+ner. Ea<gr u Dreadrd `r:.- the Dronuom of f 77.0191Adminipquvt Heannl PraeC.reu D. CNpur 5 of Ihu Code rte Ircorpenled hoe eY rdam« 3).113! yy Apgds of CDag11 s. muu D<lIeE~IMn mai> IdOlsdgrtlfeom the Erse of Dt~:r~ aea-a,~r.{ he pro mom of tl )7 039 IAdmlm~n~ a Hon 1 P~xea ,cn ' Cher Dler 3 of shit Code ut mcorDOrned here DY :rfn<r,r ~~Q JJ.I ldO Cannllalion of Chutn. Ail or+n.'Jarm.^. afam m::. lp[::i Ls<ssm:n6 ptaiq. a::Jns !:ere'alert en:r!:d. N.+:: an adn of :n< Adm. nn::a:'.< Oars E.:e E S) 'h< Audr. e'CJC:mI:u J'.rn;;e:::E, : •. u:qr '.n ^e ua p deE !or ',n n.bo-.nn9n !!) ncn!, re ;h<Cacn:y Trnmm d cvi: «:ed. +f ',; 9r ihp •r.r m:«tl,^;.`.<: {eE, o: pn C. f+l mere:.^.+c on: r. (m :n: J'_:.: dual era;; (c1 Nra.;F.:`.<rrJr Jr mn; a'r<o!:.:<.E.^:rv:nn.<Bca:. !r D:•r;ar,- pear. CrsgnanC p!:; -:o t:`<re: ::'o ahve rcV:E''n{am- il+:v::n aai :e :re :: <: e:na:,x J!a..`.arP: Id) rl.elpl~)::: f 1 Ih<a•n« a!;h<:acC •+. m::niv.^sih!e !r. tS<.eA¢!dn: fp on anpnp a. :: ed+ : ;`<.. n G+re b> the n;uc Jr :) mY c. v, s:hcal ^, r.nc, ar o:.::: <pohucu mbdianon anC b[GYteJ9f Y`JI ~puh.: Ju;,<'I`•a. aa: lab K.:J W t !Or d<~.n^yat.^.::v[1. )).1365 Procedure for qe/untl of Prymenl. .+o ore<r rm , a!9nd':mm~ N< rm<{9in{ ucnon she:; x made a«Cr J a [W.^.. airs .`:dpy:.:<pelan.ho p+:tl :ne Sp<cia: +33:Nae9.;hnr (Ylfdl+n, «tCJIJI. J< 1E:':rJ{I: +IJf: (D! NN u'nhlnth:«D)y<m +':e: mabn{:b<prymem t9u{.hl Ic h r.!vntled. r-o: ~' l i ~ .tit '.~.6 I. J ~ .) (...3 ' L~ lac Abuemal 9f Abandoned V'ehhde. ai of +ny .chicle on public or privet p~e0rry „esvmp;lcn ihal :hr:+s::e{'~se: e. 9. n« a: ~:hr ab+ntlJ .T.rnl +nE It :hr![p) :+p:r for r.d Gtpommn of the .rh¢Ic. wFSn the +b+ltmrm the dna;or tf DEHS N+II antl« Ia Ide $an v Nd4 n91 Ie u«:d irate !or I9w:n{ and even 1nl Pa)t o: nOralt. I/ Daymem a nor m+tle on behuf of the reel:<red ov ner o(IAr chide anh:n spry f601 Ca Yt a0er muhr'10! etch hGl, the tlveua[ m+> usve an.Ap+ndoned Vrhide G;+von+nd/ar n9ufy the D<a+nmem of Nemr Vehi<I«. ]].133] Dbpoul of Rhidn N'hicA a r Public .V uiuo«. If + ven¢b IDO p+m Ih<; a; are re.-.cued from + p: aptrtY +S + pup& r.umntt, :he veNa« or pam Ihereo/ shall br disposed of py removtl to a tcnp Y+rd, b; e,,^,ad +u:omobi:e dumanda's )ud or any iwuple net OnemunM q S+n 7tmc,"uro Cevnty DEH$ for pramnry ,t <«ap. )).1310 Abal<m<m Pracedum for vehldn WMcp N Abendpn<d. If +n aMnOOnrd .ea¢:r vd paru :hnrof art rm9.ed lrom a e S:ol<n ~'rhrtle Surem•of rht Departmem of lu¢i« m f the removJ. pn Y<ilhl lal bows of lhr remwv, <adud:nl wakrnds a nonce shal~pe um m Nt rt{uurcd u:d IeW oa'nen DY repnerA or am(ed mvl to the lur addms lined tmml of Molor Vebtln. +nd Io any ache person kn0a'n an m the mNde. TNS naiu+hall include rile fo0oaan/ namq +ddrw. uid;elghom numbs of Coun:Y DENS; '. loouan 9f the plur of npnlr end deunDUOn of the shall include, if ova:hble, make, L«^u Plne numbeq imion pumper, and mdu{<: 81 ID<+v:hang)' and Curpof<!ar rmoviN Ih< `ehs!r, (d) A +uumem IMI Ne \<N<le wid b< dupoud of hh«n pJ) dept Irom the dne of IM roue; (el A tmemem IMI :hro~attund mmn:rd prrwru, onhc gems, here +n oppanvniq far+pows:o:+le Annr.{ J Ne re0uen u made in person, in wnbnl, or pY rrlrynane wow Irn (10) d+Y+frOm 111< drlr Of lA[ nol;<o 10 AnY reOun:eeht+nnp shall be <ondunrd amh:n fortyalhl ptl hour 9f the re0u«I. «cludin{ reekends and hobdaYt. Eaceput Provided hrrnn, Inc pronponf of 1 JJ.039 (Admminrurv< Heannl Prxedu«sl of Chapur 3 of Ihr Code are mcorporO<d here by refean;e. Fulure a/ nlhe: the repnerrd or Iryv urntr or imerepN parson or Ihnr qem to rcQueu or la uimd+aneduled hearml fMll uNfy d+e procal pondiorpe Ae+nn{ re0wamrnu If. +(1« 0heen II!I d»t feet Nr sou Lcauon due, IAe vehice remunf undvmM end :Ae IOwnl and npnle («< Mee nol pnn pad, and d no rryue: for • pon.nmge hunnl •we m+dr ar < pon.tmrgr Aonnt `+t Doi nunded. Ire Caun:y DEH$ may +olhonu diyot+l of the vehwlr. 1 r.n<:,amn ,pa ,eEreua onn<:[n,:«r. s._ <ci p.:.rsr ¢ie ue aei nabY,c !net ;he rc:a: Er J ^<.°. _ _ V r.m \ er Uev, :ne Gu.v) DEH6 m+) +u::oo« ereu. 9';ne • r..:.; DupcNl of :he ~SN:IC may pnl) X:o a Lc<nsed E::,-,am:e a; ..-y .: ar. prxeuer A `e..k d:vpeuC of pvram:o P..J u;ux. ire. nei !< ~rannruned Jr m+dt oprnhr, unor n n + v<!a::< 9vai:5u !0' n:hu ..".Jneles e+niyt ar Ntionul n.".:::e I::mse pb"f^ )7.1:11 Abuemml Pm<edum for Apantl9ned \'ehitlo Nngh \elued n Gaver IhaJ DW, A!'.«~..1c ahnrmenl and:emo`al pra«u Enu:S:C s.; il.! nu aa:v:::d. u_:hr parrs: o: aac nR:fupar m t )J ::SC ha`e Seen ma. a '.<c w:< aid ~n< c.. u:wC o nt•1 remmcd. +bandanrd •<N[le .vh a .sue of a~« Ihra hunt: H dJl:an fSi00!, and etch ale r01 be carried om i! it R« aw• rum for :'e rcmavU, r10r+(t+nd +ppil<dllCn fpr il[1 /l'.C blur.^.J::ta paid ar: Ih<vde:e ..".at not teen ade<med by :ne rctine; re J: I<P: a+nr: :! the •enrar. Dnu lepl 9anarbp haJ been masf«;ed o:`e Ca_c:, by lim We, in<,mrtl«tl Jr pant :Mr<9f aril be solE on a !q. +: s[nedul[E dal[ py an apN9n Jr 9lhr, au:nor:d. IeVi ma,^.oE p<.-rtl for the C9aely, 77.1311 Procetl9rc lee gedrm Ptlpn Jf \'<nidn. A vehicle rbch a valued +I Nr« bundrrd daL'a: { IS)W) or Ins. and rmmA Fu b«n removed from a Dropeny by ;pe Coun:y DEHS alld/0( [Jnl«Ct rrMt[a as N apindpntd `[hi[r, ma) bt relr[m[d OY :ne n¢ineH or 1ep1 owner 0( the whl:k +!ie; pa -: a' [asealhlr rt:noui and n9f+{e pacts, ucivG{ Len s+ie cwu, w i:n.a fftem IIJI dVO of N<mu0n1 du[ of aouficanon of rtmoal. A vchid<w MCh n valued n :bra hundred tlollan 157001 ar !«s. and ahmh h.u pan rttnev<d from • proper Y' % the Cav'b' DEHS ,nd/or <omr+n arvicn u d pebLC nuisance, mar pr redeemed b> :he rrt:n«ed or Iryal awnn of IM vehicle afar p+Ym<m of romnaN< amoral, non{t +nd lien uIr cOm wnh:n .en (107 dept of :he er,e pf amore. A `chide which it valved tl tr«I« ;bars Nr« hundred da:Ian rtt0a). and wNCn hu been rcmevrd from a amoenv by the C9av:r In n9 usi shvl Ilse cunt cMrltO to the lepl or rryinbC pw r.: for remov+l and disponei0n of an apandaned vrNde ur.Cr. iLS se;::an acrd ;hots (W 19wint Nd ftv<n (TI d+)'1 9f f10at[. 37.1190 AulAOtlueloa Io Fafom CAUpq Coda cad Vrnide Code ProrWoes. NorwlMUndinl NY ocher DfoNUOn of Chit chap:«, the Drtmor of DEHS and his daunued emploi«s arc amho:ucd m r<mo-e aband9nd and umurnded vrAdn pwtuant m Ne prawm,v of Cpuray Code S ]3.036 and +bandanN vehitl« Dunmm to Ne pro`~aiam of V'<N<Ir Cade 133669. In uefeifinl rN+auth9nq' Ihq~ that: !ollow as pKKrduW and ittal requiremmef ap0liuble to wd mniont. 77.1397 Deurmle+uoe o/ EaIm+IM V'aloa of Vepi<les. For Gen We DurWM, DEHS Shail determine Ih<e;;r..lud •a.:e of vehicin+nd mumun proper doeummuuon and {rvr rant a.'9ns u reduuN by USe C+Efomu eNde Code nlh rnpen wveNCin wNc.h ue +bnrd and removed under This <Mpt«. DEH7 Nil dr.ennme ahnha IAC ePYnalpd value of a veN<le rhu Fus pan ard«. ed remar eC. lured er norN a IMa hundred dollars !51001 or Im: or o`« :na< hundred dollaa 153001 bet lea rh+n or equal to one IhouunC Ycul fSi.0001: or Oar one Ihovund dollar fS 1.0001 A:I rtp', r'~ employed +nd Wuied emga>as of DENS (inclvdinl :onnn emPlaYm) ve arnhorued to mate +Dprai W t to d«ermme :hr v.u of vehaies +b+re0 Or removed under INS ordinance. )7.1391 Ctlminal Peelle. UNnf orherrnu aovided, any arson, rem or m:pant:ee r violauM any proviuan Of Ihu ehapur, ether Net :ht To•,Lnm ct ( J3 iillbl. Mtll be Nlhy of +n infamon or mice-.arc' a Aernmfltt fpecilyd, and uch day or ponion Ihnrof wcF. no+:.c:. II In Gilrtnct fhJ p< a new +nd Npvale a(f[nlt AnY DertOn m mmi<IN fMll b<: UI luihy of an infnmon offenu and Dumthed br . !~n< o! net len I Am fi/ry dollar If]0) put na eatdin{ one hurtled C91r s (5107) for a fvtl violmon: fpl luil7 of m mRanion offenu +nd DemNe! bl + fee ra~ lea INn one hundred dollars IS 1001 and rat «<e<d.:.{ iwC r. E'cd doll+n (f 3001 for a Inand naLOan: Icl Ihr thud +nd app +ddniontl no4iioN Nil q~l mudemunor offense +nd fMll be pvmshable p) + Ln< •a: < '+~ five hundrA do0us !35001 nor mornhan one lhODUnC CO,.vI f. AC. of by im Pntanmenl in Iht CoumY lul for a ism not acrcd^I r"c "~ meet N. or barn ~d~ Noo-hhnmdin{ Ihs thous, a tiro or urond offense ma>' be Chtgtd and prOlKYltd ai t mibtmuML Iv WQII101110 dlr tbOVt penalun, such comined prim, firm, rmpoanon m oN[r mtlry mq, in the diurnion o(Ihe mun, be ordatd ro rtimburu DEHS for tll nanury mvs ineutted IhrmN imnri{Non, diwOVtry, +nalpii, impenion, abnnnenr+nd otfia tnual mw imvrte0 by DEHS or iu yenu ptminin// to the violation. Thr coon shall fu IM amount Df+ny such rtimbunsmentt upon mbminion o/ Drmf of •uch win q DEHS. P+ymml of my p<mhy h[rnn Dro•idrd shall not ndot a moon. firm ore0rpor+tion. or other mtil)' from Ne mponubi@>' of eonenm{ Ne condirioo raWJn{ from the NDllnm. SJ.I399 IalvnKlon. AnY we of DrapmY comnry m:he proviii0m o(Ipl+ Cods (hall be and is hntby dKluw ID be Ynla.ml. UPpOon rmuen of the Diemor of EnwamnmW HdN Servieo, m after CtWU• mfortanmr o1fuK. an anion for iniunnive retitf may b[ commme[d fm Ih< abuemenp rtmoval m0 mioimnar Iharof is rht minors provbN by Vr. ApplicKion MUI be mad[ w inch mun m mum. rhitk Nvt in0~n oinl'panl sueh rsOtl, to aqu a mnov[such uu, and restrain e j y pnwv twin uun3 any pommy mnUary to the prolifioes of 0is Code. R fMll b< Im ri3fit and duty of sven~ riruen 10 plnlnDalt and a1/Ifl:h[ COUni)' OfRCIW in Iht mfattmml Of lllr movifianf of Nit Cade. SECTION S. TNr mdlmna shall into elfin ddnY p(p d+y+ from the due of adapuan. F°~9~d~ ~k:~' b BARBARA C0.AN RIORDw?', Ch+rt a+n Romd Df Suarviwn MARTHA M. SCVDDER Clerk of Ifis Houd oI Suaniwn Of 111t COYnty 0I St0 HnOIIdNO STATE Oi GALIFORN(A i COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINO ~ `' 1, MA0.THA M. SNDDER. Clerk of the Baard of Supers Ron f Ih[ CDUnO' of Sm Bnnndino. Suu of CW forni+, hereq m:~.!p Thar n a rc{WV mtNn3 of N[ Hoard of Supsmwn of said Covnry' and Sorg heM on the )In dq' of JuIY, 19{9, n .hich malinl •rm pr[unt SupcYison Muslu Turoci. Jon D. Mikelf, Wry N'd4q absn L. Hammak, Hoban Cnm Riordan, and the Clerk. :he fort{ain3 mdiwsce ru paved and adopttd q~ th<fDllouln{ •om.:o u9u AYES: Supmiwa imoe, MikNs, WtlYK, Htmmmk, RiorNn. NOES; Nons. ABSENT: Noes. IN WIID'ESS WI{EREOF. 1 Mrs RKmmo m my Nod +nd afford tM o10>al sd of the Houd of Supmison IW l In an of lulY. 1939. MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clnk of the Ruud of Sumrvisors of the County of Sm Rernudino, Ant of GliforNa. a.l D ORDIIJANCE N0. 460 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAFYN4GA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPPII4G, HY REFERINCE, ORDI7~WNCE N0. 3349 OF THE GL7UN17 OF SAN BFIAII~RDINO PFI2TATI4IIJG 'ro THE F91'ABI.ISFA421P OF RCII.ES, RII,UfATIONS AfiID P120C1DUI2ES FOR PAFQTCIPATIIJG II4 TAE VFHICLE AB\1II~7P AND RF}1JVAL PROGRAM OF THE CDUNPY OF SAN BfRNARDIIJO, INCLUDING THE F_st`zRTT~pgp7r OF CERTAIN F'EFS AND PFI4AFTFES A. Recitals (i) 4he City of Rarrho Cucamonga has entered into an agreement with the County of San Bernardino to participate in the County's vehicle abatement program regarding abaMoned, dismantled, inoperative, junked and wrecked vehicles within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pursuant to the requirrnients of that agreement, the City is required to adopt, by reference, ordinance No. 3349 of the County of San Hernazdino pertaining to the rules and ra7ul.ations establishing the County Vehicle Abatement and Removal Program. (ii) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (sections 50020, et seq.), authorizes the adoption, by refex'enoe, of ostain state and local ordinances, including the County of San HernarTlino Vehicle Abatement and Removal Program as adopted by Ordirunoe No. 3349 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Ber~utdino. (iii) At least one (1) copy of said Ordinance certified as a full, true and mrrect wpy thereof lry the City Clerk of the City of Randro Cucartanga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in aarordance with the provisions of California Govermmnt Cade Section 50022.6. (iv) Prior to the adoption of this ordinance, this City Council mn<tucted a duly noticed public hearing, as required 61' California Government Cade Section 50022.3. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the ordinance have occurred. B. ordinance. NOW, 'IFIF72EFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follavs: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: `Ihe City Council of the city of Rancho GVCamorga heretry adopts the provisions of the San Bernardino County "Vehicle Abatement and Removal Program" as adopted by Ordinance No. 3349 of the Board of Sly~rrsvisors of the County of San Bernardino. ~) Ordin~nx No. 460 Forge 2 T ^f'Yi $-F~1~PION 3: 'lt~e city Cuuicil declares that strould any provisiai, section, paracgaph, ~„r or words of this Oxdinanoe to rendei'al or declared invalid by amr final mart action in a mist of competent juri~tiction, or try reason of any px~tive legislation, the rmainirq provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Orrlin3rice shall remain in full force arcs effect. SFX'lION 4: the City Clerk Ordi7fance and shall cause the same t' after its passage at least once in newspaper of general circulation, California, and circulated in the City shall certify to the passage of this be published within fifteen (15) days the Inlaid valley Daily Bulletin, a published in the City of Ontario, of Fanilo Cuca~roiga, California. 21Z - --~---- - CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT '' DATE: November 6, 1991 ~: Mayor and Members of the City Council r HROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY, Jan Reynolds, Assistant RDA Analyst SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 RECOMMENDATION: To continue the public hearing to November 20, 1991. The Mayor Pro-Tem may open the public hearing to take testimony from any person who cannot attend the meeting on November 20. BACKGROUND: On September 18, 1991, the City Council approved Resolutions of Intention to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to fund public improvements in an approximate 600 acre area in the eastern portion of the City. Among other things, the Resolutions directed the preparation of an Engineer's Report by the City's Assessment Engineer, A.A. Webb and Associates, for presentation to the City Council at its November 6, 1991 meeting. Staff is requesting a continuance to November 20 so that the full Council can attend the public hearing and to allow added time for the Council to review the public hearing information. The final Engineer's Report will be distributed under separate cover prior to the agenda packet for the November 20 meeting. Staff has notified the property owners of the request for continuance of the public hearing to November 20, 1991. Respectfully submitted, ^! ~ /~~'M-c{il~ /fir v{,lL(.~t~ ~~ ~Lihda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager ~I ------- CITY OF RANCHO Cl'CANONGA STAFF REPORT DATE November 6, 1991 TU Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager `~ SUBJECT: GanSidEialinn of Formation of Drainace Area Nn- 91.2 R ecommend atinn: L is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution forming Drainage Area No. 91-2. This area is being lormed at the request of the property owner to satisfy a condition of development to maintain certain drainage facilities. Background: The proposed Benefit Assessment District consists of two parcels as shown on the attached map, The parcels that comprise the District are APN 225-082-O1 and APN 225-071-65. Combined the parcels cover an area of approximately 144.34 acres. The District is being formed to provide funds to perform maintenance on certain drainage facilities that protect the District. These facilities include a desilting basin and a 1,460 linear (oot concrete channel. Because of the debris that can accumulate in these facilities, annual maintenance is required to keep the facilities in working order. These maintenance activities would include monthly inspections, bi-monthly weed abatement, and annual removal of debris and sediment. The about information is detailed in the engineer's report for this District. In addition, the engineer's report details the annual costs to be assessed and the method to be used to spmad the assessments. 9'Ite annual cost for maintaining the facilities of this District is estimated nt 532,X0, This cost will be divided equally among the parcels ns all parcels in the District arc receiving an equal level of protection from the drainage facilities. Based on the proposed developments (or the District, it is anticipated lhnt there will be 350 residential parcels in the District. Based nn the above (igures, the annual assessment for each parcel is projected at 592.17. This District is required of the developer to meet conditions for pulling building permits, and this District will provide funds (or ti,c City to maintain the referenced facilities. Also, this District is being requested by all of the affected property owners as evidenced by their "Petition and Consent" loons Consideration of the Formation of Drainage Area 91-2 November 6, 1991 Pagc 2 on file in the Office of the City Clerk. R is, therefore, recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution forming this District. Res iectfully submitted, L^ 21 ~~ g Q O V Q W =0 h ~~ Vh Q 4yi~WVp'' _~~~. tiOZ Q~Q~~vO ~ \~OZQ WO ~~ W j m ~m V W ~ O ~ j ~ O V 3 S 4 2~ S W Z i'~i i'° i 1 '-4i th !i , r, E r'i~~ "~ 1' '- ~!le' ;~~. i3 I~~ r~ 'f ' ~1~={ ~~!! !1 f~; ! ~il IIiE ! !~i 11.rr !!~E !~ b: " jllfiJ'il! I! ~'i ~Er '"! r"i ~' ~'i il!E !1- !iIl! jlll 9~ 9~! •o ~~ ~~~gg 'k49 ~~~~ ~~ a9~6a k~ ~ 4A oa $~ad~ €e < ~6 e ~~ i ~ R~ n°• ~ ' ja o I W ~r ;g p N ~ I y1t~ F i a i ~~ ~ E '4~\ N ~`-... FINAL ENGINEER' S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91.2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 November 6, 1991 ~ ~ ~o RESOL[A`ION NO. 91 / A RESOI.UIT~1 OF THE CITY COUNCII, OF 1HE CI1Y OF RANQiO CDCA6DN(,Ti, CAISFtlRNIA, ADDPITNG ANNCWL BENEFIT ASSESS- MFId15 F[Y2 A DRAINI~E AREA WiiQ2FAS, the City Council of the city of i~o Curamonga has irU.tiated proceedings and held a public hearing relating td the levy arc] inQosition of benefit assessnpnts pursuant to the tpr~ns and provisions of the '~Bemfit Assessment Act of 1982^, being Qiapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Goverrmwst Code of the State of California, caamncirg with Section 54703, said azea of benefit ixirg krwwn arc] designated as DRAII~OE AREA ND. 91-2 (hereinafter referrer] to as the "Benefit Area"); and WfII~RFAS, at this time the public hearing has been held in the manors and form as required by law, arc] this City Council is nvw satisfied with the Report of the Figineer and is ready to proceed to levy the annual asses9rents on eadr benefited parcel of property within the Benefit Area; and Wf0'RFAS, it is further determined that there are less than twelve (12) registered voters within the local area of benefit, aryl that a written petition and wnsent to the levy of the assessments has been sutmitted, executed by the witness of more than sixty percent (608) in area of the larxls prq~osed to be --~-^^^~', thus no election will be required. NOW, THQ2EFOl2E, the City Council of the City of Ranc]ro Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECPION 1: 71wt the above recitals are all true and oorl'ect. Sfr.TTON 2: The public hearing is closed and all protests of arty kind, if arty, aze hereby expressly overnled and denied. BOUNDARIES SECPION 3: That the bamrlaries and parcels shown within the area of benefit designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 are hereby ratified arct deter- mined to be the properties benefiting from the proposed works of mairntenancP. WRI'lTQ4 NNSIIJP AND WAIVFI2 OF ELECTION $ECFION 4: It is heretry further determined that a written petition and consent to the levy of the assessments has been filed by property owners representing more than sixty percent (608) in area of the larcl, and it is hereb+ further determined that the proposal and formation of the Benefit Area shall take full force and effect without arty requirement of a vote by a majority of the area. ']his detcsnnir~ation is made pursuant to Section 54717 of the Government Cade of the State of California. 2~~ F.esolution No. 91-*** Page 2 SF7CI'TON 5: 'That it is hereby determined and o,dera7 as follows: 1. 7lat the annual levy of ,°-~-°^°^'s far the mair~terr~me and/ar servicing of the ir~rroverents are hereby ccofisnied and levied for the next fiscal year. 2. that it is further determined that as applicable the costs of the work and servioess may be greater than can conveniently be raised fran a sirgle annual assessment, and it is hereby further der=„n;rwd that the cost of the work can be collected over a period of years. SDCTICTI 6: that it is hereby further ordered that the work of maintenance as set forth in the Resolution of Intention is hereby specifically ordered, said work des¢ibed as follows: Annual maintenance, including the removal of ~~+~*++~ and debris fora public basin and thannel iriprovam_nts (pay Canyon) to benefit and protect properties within the bonudaries of the Benrefit Atea. For a full and detailed description of the services to be funded bi' the inposition of the special G~~'+ts, refeternoe is hereby wade to the "Report" p^eviously approved and on file in the Office of the City Clerk. NCI' CE SfLZ'ION 7: That immediately upon the adoption of this Resolution the city Clerk shall cause ratite to be given in the fallowing manors: 1. Deliver the original Report of the IIgineer mnsistirg of the assessment and diagram to the City IIgineer, and said City Fr~gineP.r shall immediately place for record said diagram and assessment in a suitable book as a permanesrt reoozd. 2. Cause a certified Dopy of the assessment diagram and annual asses~nent levy to he filed with the County Auditar, said filing to be anpleted no later than AUGUST 10711. 3. Cause a certified copy of the assessment diagram to be immedi- ately filed in the Office of the O~unty Recorder. 4. Cause to be recorded a NOTICE OF ASSES34Q~IP in the CUUnty Recorder and attarIred to said Notice shall be a list setting forth the ramess of all property owners within the boundaries of the Benefit Area. ~~~ Resoltitiort No. 91-*** Page 3 AssFCa.,FNr mia~rrtox sF~fION &: That the above wnfirmed aid levied annual assesstoent shall be collected at the same titre aid in fbe same manner as gemral Oamty property taxes ate mllectRd aid all laws providing far the collection arcs enforcamnt of Camty taxes shall Ue applicable to the collection aid enfm-ce- trent of these as~essmMs- 2~~ FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout -Mayor William J. Alexander -Mayor Pro Team Charles J. Buquet II -Councilmember Diane Williams -Councilmember Pamela J. Wright -Councilmember Jack Lam -City Manager Debra Adams -City Clerk Joe O' (veil -City Engineer Professional Services Brown, Harper, Burns & Hentchkee -Legal Counsel Willdan Associates -Assessment Engineer FINAL ENGINEER' S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Paee Engineer's Report 1 Exhibit A - Description of Service 4 Exhibit B - Cost Estimate 5 Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule 6 Exhibit D - Proposed Boundaries and Assessment Diagram 9 Exhibit E - Method of Spread 10 moot/osov~mz~ AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT': DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 T0: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPORT PURSUANT TO "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982" Pursuant to direction from the City Council, submitted herewith is the "Report", consisting of the following documenu, pursuant to the provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This "Report" is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal vear commencing July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1993. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual special assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Assessment: The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. 4. PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (Exhibit "D"): A diagram showing the exterior boundazies of the area of benefit, the boundaries of any zones within the area of benefit, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the area of benefit. Each parcel shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those on the County Assessor's map for the fiscal year to which the "Report" applies. 5. METHOD OF SPREAD (Exhibit "E"): The basis and schedule for the levy of the proposed assessments. No assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property andright-of- way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Executed this day of 1991, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ASSESSMENT ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Joseph A. Francisco, Final approval, mn5rmation, and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's "Report" was made on the day of , 1991, by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment RoII and Engineer's "Report" was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the day of , 1991. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY ENGWEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA EIfHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within the proposed district are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. ProteMion of the properties within the distriM from overland flows requires the construction of a 27± acre-foot desihing basin and a 1,460± linear foot concrete dcainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desihing basin. Each yeaz the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris which accumulates in the desihing basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desihing basin and channel. B. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desihing basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desihing basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rain fall, this service may be required mote frequently. EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE A. Cost of Annual Maintenance Desilting Basin 523,000 Channel 7.000 Subtotal B. Incidental Expenses City Administration S 2.260 Subtotal C. Total Annual Costs D. Contribution E. Balance to Assessment 530,000 E 2.260 532,260 -~ 532,260 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the tests and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, adopted the Resolution ordering the preparing and filing of a "Report", all in accordance with the provisions of said Act and, WHEREAS, said Report consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each pazcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the appointed Assessment Engineer, by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said AM and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the next fiscal yeaz. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Cost Ectimate Cost of Maintenance $30,000 Cost of Improvements 0 Incidental Expenses 2.260 To[al Costs $32,260 Contribution/Surplus _~ Balance to Assessment $32,260 A diagram is attached hereto showing the area of benefit and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels of land proposed to he assessed for the service work to he provided. 1 do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within We azea of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of any assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay for the cos[ of any service other Wan the service for which the assessment was levied. The assessment pazcels herein refer to [he County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. Where, and if applicable, different zones for different areas of benefit have been established, and a different method of spread was used, if applicable, for differing degrees of benefit. In the opinion of the undersigned, the assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: WR.LDAN ASSOCIATES ASSESSMENT ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA The assessments are those as confirmed in Column I, unless a different figure appears in Column II, as modified. I.• II.' ASSESSMENT PROPERTY AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT NUMBER DESCRIPT-ION ASSESSMENT AS MODIFIED 225.071-65 350 and Residential $32,260.00 225.082-O1 Parcels TOTAL $32,260.00 When final maps are approved by City Council, refer to the method of spread for Division of Assessments. 3 e3 (r trr i ~ i( titn II:~,~~ I~,(,; ~~,~; ((-rF ~ ~i ~!~ Fi (f 4j !~!j t uF {i fi~ r Si ' ''~ ~ ! f!f '~~ t~ ~r S s~li~ bir' ~ :t Sit {if~t F s r iii Eii ~ ~ std r~r. I ~ ~ 0 1~ I \ ~~ ~ ~a a~ c ~~ ~i ~ s , ~~ Z I " ga Bi I k `~~ rtu rw.~.r .wwrw~ D ~F A, e~ a qp ~q ~~ q peago !~ ry " `C ~n U x W 0 ~I a~ tl 8 O C 0 y . 0 1 _~ y~ p~~ =O~ ~a ti~ pa ~1p n~ ~ ~ ~ C y ~ a a N i 2 ffl p Z y ~ ~n y ~ n ~ ~ b ~ 2 ~ a EXHIBIT E METHOD OF SPREAD The law requires and the starves provide that assessments, az levied pursuant to the provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Ac[ of 1982", must be based on [he benefit that the properties receive from [he works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment proceedings. The responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correM apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, Willdan Associates will be performing the services of the Assessment Engineer. Willdan's quali5ed team of professionals has assisted public agencies in the formation of more than 200 Benefit Assessment and Mello-Roos Districts throughout California, Nevada, and Arizona. Willdan's involvement in the formation of these districts has resulted in bonded indebtedness of over Sl billion. Willdan is one of the few fitvts that can offer more than one registered engineer experienced in Benefit Assessment and Mello-Roos proceedings. Willdan's team also includes professionals experienced in accounting, computer science, and finance who have experience in district formation and administration giving them the well-rounded knowledge needed to assist public agencies in the formation of Benefit Assessment and Mello-Roos Districts. The Assessment Engineer then makes its recommendation at the public hearing on the Benefit Area, and the final authority and action rests with the City after hearing all testimony and evidence presented at that public hearing. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City must make the final action in determining whether or not the assessment spread has been made in direct proportion to the benefits received. First of all, it is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvements will render to the properties within the boundaries of the Benefit Area. The properties within the proposed district aze located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin Area. Protection of these properties from overland flows requires the construction of a 27± acre-foot desil[ing basin and a 1,4601 linear foot concrete drainage channel The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties. The channel will then transport the overland flow, sediment, Vash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. All parcels of land located within the boundaries of the District benefit from the protection afforded by the proposed improvements. L` the District was not protected from the overland flows, development rights would not be permitted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since the construction of the improvements described above directly bene5t the District, then the annual maintenance of these improvements also dueMly bene5t the District. In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from Utat of the general public In this case, an analysis was made, and several factors (described below) aze used in the 5nal method of spread and assessment. The drainage channel and detention basin will operate together as a system to protect [he properties within the district. The District will contain approximately 350 residential parcels. Each parcel receives a special and direct bene5t from the improvements in the form of protection. Each parcel's benefit is no greater or no less than the adjacent parcels. Therefore, the method and apportionment of the costs for maintaining the improvements will be divided equally among the total number of residential parcels, regardless of the final number. In the event the final subdivision maps designating the total number of parcels have not been recorded by July 1 of the year, annual assessments aze to be collected, the method or appoNomnent will be based on parcel acreage. Once the final subdivision maps have been recorded, the method or apportionment will be divided equally among the total number of parcels. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the azsessments for the Benefit Area have been spread in direM accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvement. DATED: , 1991 WII,LDAN ASSOCL4TES ASSESSMENT ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1;111 yr xnrvi:rly i;ui;nmfnv~n STAFF REPORT DATE: November 6, 1991 T0: May oz and Members of tha City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Szad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Watr en, AB80C1 ate Planner SVSJECT; CONSZDERATI Qi OP ENVI RCNMENTAL .ASSESSMENT _ AND GENERAL PLAN In accordance with the 1989 Air Quality Mana gemen< elan, an air Quality Element has been prepared for inclusion as part of Chap[er V, Public Health and Safety section, of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The amendment includes the expansion o£ the goals, objectives, and policies of the Air Quality, Circa lationr Energy, and Implementation sectionfl of the General Plan including provisions of the 1909 Air Quality Management Plan, as adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Southern California Asaocl ation Of Governments. tacvll~Dm Actzog The Planning CommSssion recommends the adoption of the Air Quality Element, as amended, for inclusion in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and recoamends issuance of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures for the Environmental Assessment of this project. BACII'AOggD i DISCOBSIOq The City's cone ideration of the adopt inn of an Air Qua llty Element la the result o£ the Air Quality Management Plan 4AQMP1 which was adopted by the California Air P,esources Board on August 15, 1989. The control measures in the AQMP propose a wide variety of means for achieving the goa le of regional mohi liry, ba Lanced growth and cleaner air, including local air quality elements. All of the measures have a legal mandate to be Smp lemented. With the County and local cities requited to address air qualify issues, it was felt that the moat appropriate and effective Way of addcesaing the cegional problem was on a regional level. Therefore, this element is the re salt of a joint effort on the part of the County and 15 cities of the county that fall within the South Coast Air Basin to produce a model document that would be acr_eptable to all jutiedictions. City Council representation (Subcommittee membe ce Mayor Stout and Mayor Pro Tem Alexander) was a part of the element's formulation. The County Boatd of Supervisors approved the County's version of the element and certified en accompanying Environmental Impact Report nn August 12, 1991. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-04A - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 On September 25, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed a version of the model element drafted to conform with provisions and format of the City's General Plan. During its review, the Commission made several additions for clarification of the policies and objectives which are indicated with bold print on pages 9, 11, and 14 i., the attached draft. Foe further analysis of the document and description of the Commission's action, please refer to the attached Planning Commi ssicn staff report and minutes of September 25, 1991. ENVIRONMENTAL AESRSSMaNT The Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration based on information provided in the Tier II EIR which was certified by the Board of Supervisors in conjunction with the County's Air Quality Elemen t• The EIA addressed the environmental issues relating to the adoption of the County Regional Air Quality Plan on which the Rancho Cucamonga Air Quality Element is based, as is this environmental analysis. Aa a result of mitigation measures listed in the Environmental Assessment, iE the City Council concurs with the Negative Declaration recommendation, a mitigation measure monitoring program must be adopted io eneuze the timely enactment of the mitigation measures. Staff has developed such a program and it would be appropriate Eor the Council to approve the monitoring program with its adoption of the Negative Declaration as part of the project's Resolution of Approval. CVRR68PONDHRCE These items have been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper with an 1/Bth page legal ad. ACTION If the City Council concurs with the findings and recommends bona of the Planning Commission and the information presented at this heari nq affirms those conclusions, it would 6e appropriate Eoz the City Council to approve the Air Quality Element by the adoption of the accompanying Resolution. Respe lly 'tted, Brad 7.er City lanner BB:AW/jfs Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 25, 1991 Planning Cnmmi esion Minutes dated September 25, 1991 Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-143 kesolUtion of Approval Exhibit "A" - Mitigation Monitn [inq Program Exhibit "H" - Draft Air Quality Element 23S CITY OF RAFCHO CCC:~~tOVGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 25, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Hrad BU Ller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVSRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-OaA AIR QUALITY ELEMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMRiGA - In accordance with the 1989 Ai[ Quality Management Plan, an Air quality Element has been prepareL for inclue ion as part of Chapter V, Public Health and Safety section, of the Rancho Cuca mvnga General Plan. The amendment includes the expo na ion of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Air quality, Circulation, Energy, and Implementation sections of the General Plan to include provisions of the 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, ne adopted by the south Covet Air Quality Management Diatri ct and the Southern Ca lif or nla Aesooifltion of Governments. BACKGROUND: The City's consideration of the adoption of an Air Quality Element is the result of the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) which was adopted by the California Air Resources Board on August 15, 1989. The control meaeu res in the AQMP propose n vide variety of means Eor achieving the goals of regional mobility, balanced growth, and cleaner air, including local air quality elements. All of the measures have a legal mandate tc be implemented. With the County and Local cities required to address air quality issues, it was felt that the moat appropriate and effective way of addre sa ing the regional problem was on a regional level. Therefore, this Element is the result of a joint effort on the pare of the County and fifteen of ire cities that fall within the South Coast Air Baa in to produce a model document that would be acceptable to all jurisdictions. The County Board of Supervisors approved the County's version of the Element and certified an accompanying Environmental Impact Report, on August 12, 1991. DISCUSSION: The Element ie divided into slz topics which address [he following air quality issues: Government Organization Roles and ResponelD'liti e - This section provides an orgaalzati on framework for cocrdlnat ion between the numerous governmental agencies involved in atc quality issues in the South Coast ASL Bag in. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-04A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 25, 1991 Page 2 B. Ground Transportation - This is the largest section which outlines all the programs which affect ground transportation systems 1r.c luding limiting vehicle use, congestion management, increased transit services, parking limitations, and promotion of clean fuels. C. Air Transportation - Since the City is fairly C1oSe to Ontario Airport, a provision has been included outlining concerns with ground access to the facility. O. Land Use - This section deals with the issues designed to help reduce air emissions through more efficient land use patterns in response to new transportation and communication systems. E. Particulate Emissions - This section adds eases issues pertaining to minimum particulate amiss ions Erom the construction and operation of roads and buildings. F. Eneruv Conservation - Lastly, the potential to reduce air emissions through reduction in energy consumption is addressed. Zn addition to inclusion of the Aic Quality Element, staff recommends that some cross-reference be included in specific sections of the General Plan to help enforce the air quality pcovi siona ae follows (new passages in bold): The Eirst paragraph of the Circulation Element's Implementation section, page III-32, shall read as foilowa: "TT:e close relationship between land use and circulation is reflected in both the Land 'lac Plan and the Circulation Plan. Much of the success of the circulation system, as measured by the freedom of movement, the avoidance of congestion, and the viability of transit, hinges on creating a "matching" land use pattern. 'R~e snccessEnl cirwlation syete. and land use plan sate also take into consideration air quality objectives, as listed in cLepter v, which provides policies to aamge land nae relationships to rednce vehicular traFfic and thereby reduce air pollution. Aa discussed earlier, the primary tool available to local governments to achieve this pattern is zoning." The Ei Eth paragraph of the Energy secticn, Environmental Resources Super Element, page IV-22, shall read ea follows: "An important issue confronting Rancho Cucamonga is whether the City residents should continue to rely exclusively on imported, non-renewable energy resources. It is obvious that energy will become increasingly difficult and costly to obtain as the world's supply of non-renewable resources diminishes. In addition, developalest and coneuspticn of conveetianel energy reeouzcee result in significant enlseions into the environment. The conservation of energy resources by the Z37 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-04A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 25, 1997 Page 3 reduction in their use will also help the City attain the goals listed in the Air Quality 61e~ent, Chapter y.• The ninth paragraph under the Land use and Circulation section of the Energy Conservation and Management Program, Chapter VI - Implementation, shall read as follows" "Energy and air quality sensitive criteria Eor amendments, use permits, variances, and other land use entitlements." In summary, staff believes that the adoption of this element will clarify the City's goals and policies on air quality issues, and set direction fnr our continued inveatigat ion of methods to reduce negative air quality impact a. The Aiz Quality Element aces not necessitate "wholesale" revision to our existing standards and operations, but rather a gradual and concerted effort to amend the City's Standards to reflect a greater concern Eor air quality. we expect the County and special di atricts Lo take the lead in many of the programs which have a regional effect and the City providing the analysis and input on the of Eecta and acceptabl lity to our community. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, Part I and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant unmiti gab le adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of [he proposed General PSan Amendment. StafF's analysis was based on information provided in Ghe Tier II "Regional Air Quali iy Plan EIR, San Bernardino County - Cities" which was certified by the Hoatd of Supervisors in conjunction with the County's Air Quality Element. TTe EIR addressed the environmental issues relating to the adoption of the County Regional Air Quality Plan on which the Rancho Cucamonga Air Qua Lity Element is based, as is this environmental analysis. The EIR addressed County-wide concerns which in the more varied conditions of the County were Iona idered significant. Analysis at the smaller Clty scale did not necessarily portray impacts at the same level of significance. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facie and conclu siona listed above and included in the Air Qua Lity Element, staff be lievea the Planning Commission can make the Eollowing findings regarding this application: A. That State and Federal ambient air 9tandaide for Ozone and Particulate Hatter are routinely exceeded in the portion of San Bernardino County in which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is located. B. That exceedancea of these stands zda pose health threats to residents of the City and thereby also reduces the quality of life in the City. a35" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-06A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 25, 1991 Page 6 C. That continued degradation of the sit quality in San Bernardino will eventually impose undesirable economic coat on Che residents, employees and businesses in the City. D. That because air quality is a regional concern, coordina^_ed action by the Participants in the Regional Air quality Plan process will be substantial Ly more effective in achieving air quality improvements than would independent and unrelated action by individual j ur is dictions• E. That this City actively supports a continued leadership role by San Bernardino County jurisdictions in stimulating local government commitments to air quality improvement with the Scuth Coast Air Basin. F. That the goals, objectives and policies contained in the Air Quelity Element will promote attainment of state and federal air quality standards. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised ae a public hearing in the the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin newspaper with a 1/8 page ad• RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission be lieVea th¢ proposed General Plan Amendment effectively addresses the issues Snvolvl ng the City's participation in improving the region's air quality, it Ls recommended that the Planning Commtsa ion recommend approval of General PSan Amendment No. 97-04A by adoption of the attached Reeo lotion. Res fully su mitred, Br Buller City Planner BB:AW:da At tachmenta: Resolution Recommendi nq Approval a3e ba ek Co be approved, denied, or deemed complete. He ea id on September 19 they race ivad a now letter deeming the project incomplete. He £e the Commi 'on had four opGiona before them: (1) approve the project, deny the pro ct ae recommended by staff, or (3) continua the ii em ith the applicant coneeneue, or (6) deem the proj eci complete and bring back for hearing wit 'n 30 tlaye. He said the applicant had only granted Lhority for continuing th roject a maximum of 30 day e. Chairman McNiel in closed the publ ie hearing. Commie aioner Chit ie felt [hare were Ear too many 1 e anda and points of disagreement. She fa it would be appropriate to any the project without prejud lea bacau ee of th aturo of the outstandin esues. Sha felt a denial woultl give the applieant t a Go take care of th oaw anda and bring back in the type of package which uld ge[ the pso t into the procee• properly. She did not think it would b 'n the beet iereeta of the community tc say the project is acceptable. Commieeioner Melchor agreed with C uioner Chitisa. He avid it was hie understanding that iE the proj •oG r con[inuad It would have to Da through all eha steps end conmittaaa and ady action. He did not foal Ghat would be po9•ibL in 30 days and ova utione L ii could b• done in 60 day e. He feared that if the project w proauad in tuah, [hinge may b• mined. He felt denial woultl be Lhe a opriate action. Commiaaioner Valletta greed. Sha said during courts•y review several areas of concern we raised that nand to b• addran Motion: Moved y Ch iti•a, wcondad by Ma1cMr, to a t the reeolut ions denying with pr•judip T•ntat LV• Tract 14211 and the oign review of Tentative T et 14211. Motion carried by Lh• following vote: AYES: ~ COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY, VAL~'[TE COMNISSIONEPS: NONE D. fiNVSAONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN ANBNOMENT 91-OOA. AIR QUALITY ELEMENT - CITY OP MNCHO CVCAMONGA - In accordance with Lha 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, an Air Qual lty element has been prepared [or inclu•SOn ae part of Chapter V, Public N•elth and Saiaty section, of the Rancho cucamonge G•n•ral Plan. Th. amendment includaa tM expansion of Lha goo la, oDjact ive, and policies of the Alr Quality, Circulation, Energy, and Imp1•m•ntation .act Iona of the General plan to include provieiona of Ch• 3909 Air Quality Manaq•mant Plan, a^ adopted by the south Cout Air Quality Management DL•triet and the Southern California Aeeoclation of Goveinma nta. Planning commL eion Minute. .~ September 25, 199: a3~ Letry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the et aft report Commieeio ner N.e lc her ae ked if Che City could modify the Air Quality Element even though it was the result of a multi-j uriedict Tonal effort. Mr. Henderson replied that Lt can be modified to fit local conditions. Brad Buller, City Planner, et at¢d that when the 15 cities and the county worked on the Air Quality Element, they tried to develop a general format eo that it would be vas Ter to keep Crack of compliance by of her ant it iea. commies ioner Chitiea thought that the huvy vquipnent used at construction e it ee g¢neraies a lot of pollutants. Sh¢ ask¢d if amie •ion controls sou ltl be required on construction equipment. Mr. Henderson stated the plan did not atldress di¢s¢1 vzhauat• but the state ie monitoring that area because the stets ie concarnetl with pollution generated by bu~ee, commuter Tail Lines, heavy equ ipm¢ni, etc. He said the et ate ie studying ehs posy ibllity of SnclutlLng overhead alactricnl lines for electric buses using a high occupancy vehicle lane on Route 30. Mr. Buller stated that the Air Quality Management O1etilCt )AQMD) ie attempting to regulate ¢missions. He said the requirement for emission cant role on heavy equipment vrou ld be out of the Clty'• control unleea the City a ¢t ab llshed a ban on certain vehlclw. Commie¢ioner Chitiea stated did not fuel a ban would be appropriate. Chairman McNiel thought omission controls would not by used unless they become government mandated. Commies icnsr Tolstoy comunted that air quality i• a regional problem. Ne asked if the County would be Che lead agency in policing Compliance. Mr. Henderson vtated the County will be the lead agency in meeting with other counties on items that crow jurisdictional lino. Chairman McNiel op¢nsd the public hearing. There was nc pu611e testimony, and Chairman McNiel cloud the hearing. Commise ioner Melchor suggested that the plan be mod if red to indicate the ci[y would not only develop but sleo implement design standards Ghat promote access to trans It far ilitiu and standards end guldelino for increased bicycle and pedestrian route. He sGabd hs Aad recently reed an article Chat 12 percent o[ the vehicles in the state generate 75 percent of tN emiu lone. Me queationad if 1[ was appropriate for the City to support legislation tightening [ha extsting vehicle lnspacG ion program. Mr. Buller responded tN thinking was to try to make the vehic la inspection program better. Planning Commise ion Minut¢• Z Se pt¢mb¢r 25, 1991 238 Commieaioner Nelcher auggeetetl the warding be changed from ^tightene" co ^improvee^ the existing vehicle inspection program. Commissioner Toletoy euggeated a program to remove thoee veh is lea which generate the moat pollution. Chairman McNiel stated that older vehicles are pcotect¢d by law. Commissioner HeLcher eugguted intlicat ing support for private companies which buy older vehicles. He questioned how the City would integrate air quality planning coneideratione wish Che land uae and traneporiai ion planning. He auggeated that the woctl Lnq on Policies 5.1.1 through 5.1.4 be changed to reflect that the City would "adopt, implement antl enforce" the incentive e, regular ions, and prapdutea io limit duet. He thought the City may wane to require trucks from the grovel operation to be coverts whether they are full or empty, wen though that i• not eu rrently an AQMD requirement. Commissioner Chitise agreed such a policy would be good. Mr. Buller felt ^enforce" •hould not be ueod because it may in Ear chat the remainder of the document will not De enforced. CommLeloner Helcher agrvd to drop "enforce.^ H0 oDjecUd to the Pollclu 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 rogtrding the Clty'• atloption of incentives antl aguletione to reduce emiulone from eater heatSnq devices. N0 felt the City doe not hove exl»rtise in the ores. He thought the Ciiy should move quickly to enact Policy 5.2.1. Chairman McNiel thought the Air Quality Element espouses great goals, but he was nos sure how achievable some of than goals will be. He eeid that the goal to control dust on ennct tact ion sites L• laudable, but the Environmental Protect ton Agency prohibits the uo of any coating which contains oil and moat approvetl products do not work eel 1. Mr, sailer asked Lf Commie loner M0leher would object to changLnq the wording cf Policies 6.2.1 antl 6.2.2 from "adopt" to "toot loos to support." Commissioner Melchor staGd Chat would allwiab hL concern. Mr. Handsnon eisNtl that the AQMD will De supplying wms regulations which moat be adopted Ln the Gensrel Plan. He eeid they are not pqueaiing that the city do any of its own technological reeureh. commiesicner Toletoy asked how the po llutanb would he reduced. Mr. Henderson stated that once the teehnleal data le revived from AQMD, the City could require the technology on all new projects or coo ltl require phasing an all or some projwt• which had already been bulls. He Bald the City could not adopt until attar the informetien 1^ released by AQMD. Ha reported chat the reglon4l Alr Quality element he^ three progzeulve tie r• of implementation. He stated that currently Tier 1 i• in •Efect, but it clean Planning CommLesion Minu te• $t September 25, L99 ~ 3G air et andarda are not mat, AQMD will enact Tier 2 and finally Tier 3. He said the Air Quality Element Ln the General Plan was merely trying to project what types of energy conservation meaeu ree would be available in the future. Commies inner Ne lcher et at ed he thought Tier 3 was implemented because the technology ie available and common, while Tier 2 means the technology ie available but not common, and Tier 3 means the technology ie not yet available. Mr, Henderson responded that some technology for implementing Tiers 2 and 3 ie available. Ne suggested that AQMD could oven Dan some buaineeaee in certain areas in order to meet goals. Mr. Buller eiated that requlat icne woultl be pa ued on by a higher authority while incant ive• may be eonmathlnq adopted by the City, each as giving a Donus Eoz using a particular eyebm. He euggutad changing the wording to support. Commissioner Melchor stated hs tlid not object to the language as written. Commieaicner Tol etoy featsd the Air Quality Elamsnt may chow good intentions but not achieve any action. Hr. Henderson responded [hat the City must prepare an annual report on the degree of <omplinnce. Motion: Moved by Toletoy, se<onded by Chitiea, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Env LronmenGl Ae uesment and General Plan Amendment 91-06A with modifications as suggested. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCH%R, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried E' MOpIp ~ ~ ~ - - squat to modi[y a condition of appro equizlnq the undo ing of •:rating overhead utilities for a rseldent DO Lv o convert 3P8 apartment units eo condominluma on 29.53 acres located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue end Ar ghwey -~gZg_041-11. Betty Miller crate Engineer, preunted the staEi ra~prt. the Planning Comm ree ion Minu[e• ~G.- septeniber Z5, 199: 2~{p RESOLUTION NO. 91-143 A RESOLUTZ ON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOHHENOING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A, FOR INCLUSION OF AN AIR QUALITY ELEMENT AS PART OF CHAPTER V, HEALTH AND SAFETY SECTION OF THE RANCHO CVCAMONGA GENERAL PLANT AND TO E%PAND THE GOALS, OBSECTIVESr AND POLICIES OF THE AIR QUALITY, CIRCULATION, ENERGY, AND IMPLEMENTATION SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF. A. Rec it al e. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-04A ae described Ln the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter Ln this Resolution, the ecbjact General Plan Amendment La referred to ae "the epplicat ion." (ii) On September 25, 1991, the Planning Cammiasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequia itas prior to the edoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Aeeolu tion. NOW, THEREFORE, it. is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comm ie aicn hereby epectEically finds Chat all of the Eacte set Eorth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon subetant ial evidence preunbd to this Commies ion during Che above-referenesd public heating on September 2E, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public teatimany, this Commission hereby specifically fintle as fOllowa: (a) The application applies to all properties and development activity within the City. (b) ThLa amendment does not conflict wish the Land Ube Pol is ice of the General Plan and will provide Eor development, within the dLtrict, in a manner conaietent with the General Plan and with ra lated deva lopment; and (c) Thi• amendment dose promab the goals and object ivee of she Land Use Elema nt7 and (d) Thi• amendment would not ba materially in}ur ioue or detrimental co properties or improvements within the city. ~~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-141 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A - CITY OF R.C. September 75, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the aubetant ial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spec if is find Inge of facts set forth in pazagcaphe 1 and 2 above, Chia Commies ion hereby finds and cone lodes ae £ollowe: (a) That Stara and Federal Ambient Air Standartle for Ozone and Particulate Matter ate routinely exceeded Ln the portion of San earnaidino County in which the City of Rancho Cucamonga ie Located. (b) That exceetlanesf of these st andarde pone health threats to reeidenty of the City and thereby also retlucee the quality of life in the City. (C) That continued degradation of tM nir quality in San Bernardino will eventually impose untletizable economic coat on the zesltlsnt s, employees, and buainease• in the City. (d) That becnuea sit quality i• a tsgicnsl wncarn, ccordlnntad action by the part iCipanG in the Regional Alr Quality Plen pzocae• will ba substantially mote effect Lve Ln achieving alt quality improvamenta than would independent and unrelated action by individual jurisdictions. (a) That thi• Clty actively euppozt• • continued leadership role by San Bernardino County jurLdlciions Ln selmulat inq local government corm itment• to air quality improvement with South Coeet Aic Basin. (f) Thet the goals, object LVes, and policies contained in the Air Quality Element will promote attainment of state antl federal air quality standards. (g) That the proposed amendment Would not have any signif leant unmitigable impacts on the environment; and (h) That the proposed amendment la in conformance with the General Plan 4. This Commie Lon herby ELnd• that the project has been reviewed and coN idersd in compliance with the California Environment el Quality Act of 1970 and, fort hec, this Commie ion hereby recommends Lsuence of a Neget ive Declaration. S. Beeed upon the findings end coneluaiona tat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, th1• Commission hereby raaolve• that on this 75th tlay of September, 1993, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Cenerel Plan Amendment No. 91-OdA adopting the Air Quality Element, Exhibit "A^ for Inclusion Lnto Chapter V, MeaLth and Safety, and the following text changes tC the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan: 2y2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLNTION NO. 91-143 CENEAAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A - CITY OF R.C. September 25, 1991 Page 3 1) The first paragraph of the Circulation Element's Implementation section, page SII-32, shall read as follows: "The close ralationahip between land use and circulation is reflected in bath the Land Use Plan and the Circulet ion Plan. Much of the eucceve o£ the circulation ayetem, ae measured by the freedom of movement, the avoidance of congestion, and the viability of bane it, hinges on ereai ing a "matching" land use pattern. The eu ccee eful circulation system and land use plan moat alto take Lnto consideration air quality objective •, ae listed in Chapter V, which provide polic See to manage land use relaticnehipa to reduce vehicular traffic and thereby reduce air pollution. Ae diecuuad earlier, the primary tool available to local government to nchieve ehie pattern i• zoning.^ 2) The fifth paragraph of the Energy section, Environmental Re aourcee Super Element, page IV-22, shall read ae follows: "An important Leeue confronting Rancho Cucamonga is whether the City roe ident• shoo ld continue tc rely eaclueively on Lmportedr non- renawa6le energy reeourcea. IC i• obvious that energy will become increasingly difficult and costly to obtain ae the worltl'e supply of non- renawaDle reeourcea dtmin iehes. In addition, development and conaumpt ion of conventional energy reaouraee results in signif Lcent emissions info the environment. The conserver ion of energy resources by the reduction in their uea will also help the Clty attain the goals li aced in the Alt Quality Element, Chapter v.^ 3) Tha ninth paragraph under the Land Use cud clrculat ion eaction of the Energy Conaervat ion and Management Ptogrsm, Chapter VI - Implementatlon shall read as follows: "Energy and air quality eenaitiva criteria Eor amendment e, use permits, variances, and other land use ant itlemente.^ 6. Tha Secretary to ehie Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 243 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-143 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-06A - CITY OE R.C. September 25, 1991 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTE6 TNIS 75th DAY OF SEPTEMEER 1991. PLANNING COyf1ISSION OF ~TNE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commieaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart ify that the foregoing Reeolut ton wet duly and regularly introduced, paeaed, and adopted by Lhe Plann Lnq Commiaaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamieaion held on the 25th day of September 1991, by the following vote-to-wii: AYES: COMAISSIONERSx CNI TIER, MCN IEL, MELCNER, TOL STOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 244 RESOLUTION NQ ~~ _ 3 ~ 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCTL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFUAN IA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A, FOR INCLUSION OF AN AIA QUALITY ELEMENT AS PART OF CHAPTER V, HEALTH AND SAFETY SECTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLANT AND TO E%PAND THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE AIR QUALITY, CI ACULATI ON, ENERGY, AND IMPLEMENTATION SECTIONS OF TH£ GENERAL PLAN, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. li) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application fox General Plan Amendment No. 91-04A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hexeinaf ter in tfiis Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iil On September 25, 1991, the Planning Commission of Che Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heating on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of the application by the adoption of Reeo lut ion No. 91-143. (iii) On November 6, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publfc hearfng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resc lut ion. NDW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sec forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reaoluticn are true and correct. 7. Based upon subs tantia), evidence presented to this Council durfnq the above-referenced public hearing on November 6, 1991, including written and ox al staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to all properties and development activity within the City. !b1 This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the GenP,c al Plan and will provide fox development, within the district, .., a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (c) This amendment does promote the goals and abject fives of thn Land Dse Element; and 2.45 CITY COUNCIL RESOLNTION NU. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A - CITY OF R.C. November 6, 1991 Pa qe 2 (d) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to properties or improvements within the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the ahove -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: fa) That State and Federal Ambient Air Standards for Ozone and Particulate Matter are routinely exceeded in the portion of San Bernardino County in which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is ]oca to d. (b) That exceedances of these standards pose health threats to r_s idents of the City and thereby also reduces the quality of life in the City. (c) That continued degradation of the air quality in San Bernardino will eventually impose undesirable economic cost on the residents, employees, and businesses in the City. (d) That because air quality is a regional concern, coordinated action by the participants Sn the Regional Air Quality Plan process wi L1 be substantially more effective in achieving air quality improvements than would independent and unrelated action by individual jurisdictions. (e~ That this City actively supports a continued leadership role by San Bernardino County jurisdictions in stimulating local government commitments to air quality improvement with South Coast Air Basin. (f) That the goals, objectives, and policies contained in the Air Quality Element will promote attainment of state and federal air quality standards. (g) That the proposed amendment would not have any significant unmitigable impacts on the environment; and (h) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby approves F,he issuance of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures listed in the Environmental Che rk list Form, Part TI - Initial Study, Section III attachment and accompanytnq the mitigation monitoring program, Exhibit "A." 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 6 above, this Council hereby resolves that on this 6th day of November 1991, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga he rehy approves General P]an Amendment No. 91-04A adopting the Air Qua l.i ty Element, Exhihit "e," foc inclusion into Chapter V, Health and Safety, and the following text changes tc the Rancho Cucamon ea General Plan: 24b CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04A - CITY OF R.C. November 6, 1991 Page 3 1) The first paragraph of the Circulation Element's Implementation section, page III-32, shall read as follows: "The close relationship between land use and circulation is reflected in both the Land Use Plan and the Circulation Plan. Much of the success of the circulation system, as measured 6y the freedom of movement, the avoidance of congestion, and the viability of transit, hinges on creating a "match ing'• land use pattern. The successful circulation system and land use plan must also take into consideration air quality objectives, as lis red in Chapter V, which provide policies to manage land use relationships to reduce vehicular traffic end thereby reduce air pollution. As discussed earlier, the primary tool available to local government to achieve this pattern is zoning." 2) The Eifth paragraph of the Energy section, Environmental Resources Super Element, page IV-22, shall read as follows: "An important issue confronting Rancho Cucamonga is whethez the City residents should continue to rely exclusively on imported, non- renewable energy resourcea. It is obvious that energy will become increasingly difficult. and costly to obtain as the world's supply of non- renewable resources dimin ishea• In addition, development and consumption of conventional energy resourcea results in si qn ificant emissions into the environment. The conservation of ener qy resourcea by the reduction in their use will also help the City attain the goals listed in the Air Quality Element, Chapter v." 3) The ninth paragraph undec the Land Use and Circu la lino section of the Ener qy Conservation and Management Program, Chapter Vl - Imp'emen[ation shall read as follows: "Energy and air quality sensitive criteria for amendments, use permits, variances, and other land use entitlements." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resclutinn. 24 "I L ii 4 d Y .+ U u O U A > V O ~ U E C C A A . L H V p i A E M Y N O m n ODD W q d 0~ U 4 N CL O Z A y p. ~ (y m fl O p ' N OE ^I m N p Y .~ Y ..~ C D G 9 N Y N p A q L C Y~ QQQ 9 p Y p p N Y 7 O Y N Y 'O ~ ~ S .i O C 4 q ~..~ p n p d ' m m ~' d C p, W W E N M N L A .N U '~ i y 'N ~ ~ m N O O C q [Y m M L C Y p O P Y n q O j . • O .i W Y O p A N p~ O U 4 N t 6 $ P Y ^ " ~`~ M .U a . d N d M O P o O A A N A V g N C N 4 ~ C a ~i O\ ~ .a u .1 9 q .n n N O. L 9 „ a fi G O m A L Y Y O fi A 9 C ~ u A ~ C T y L U ~ q N O A N 4 p +~ ~ N 'N N N ~ W ~j ~V O p .N P E O / C O Pppj A y C A W q 'y O q C~ O W a F m~ °p Z rn ,NV~ E '~ .P u E y d M •fi C A M V O 'y A Y •~ n P N q C iC U C ~ ~ C W ' ~ N 0 E . O . j ! N a 4G Y~ E y ~ ~.y E N ~ G'O ~ N ~E (h ~ ^~ H ~ N C N C F~ 9 % C ~ N R ~ N .N U C p y C E 9 A ~ 4 f 7 N n rI N P A b n W O C N M G F ~O S ~ A L A i . u W M L N ~ U' ~ N 4 n W H L m N N q p q Y i F N Um d .i ' N. H C . C N O N ~(Ly N O W fi V T o m C n v p o ~ q u 0 d C S C U m i N V N O A ~ N A U C A C d o .W " Y 6 w M N L A A 0 C N u p ^ p A u ' A m d N~, P C ~ P~ryO. E D ~N ~j O~N ~~ p O N N N q L b N E O N O 'i W p, L Y 'qh N "~ P E N V Y T '.1 C E N O 41 C 0 4 O L C N N J N ~+ W u d M N O O ~N . H U N u .M Q~ H M1' P N ry q ~^ O F N G ~ W v • ~ o '~ . .y E o 0 0 .AC 4 E K O m .oi 0. 4 •Ci N d EihlClt •A' q m N N 0 oc qn~ aN w 'OY nb ~a .. n nx~ w m A ~ [ ~ ~ < ~ „ ~m = a ~ 'J M M 'mJ (1 > ~ C H qw m M 4 m fSt u C m~ b y Y C h O •pOl h W m O N 6 h A II o Y 1p m n M rt rt m M F, Y lbpy d ~~ Y06 5¢(mi~ cOm >oq ~p m e '(+ ~ppp° ~ m m m ~ ~ Y W~ 11 v °° m S > m p 0 h p( C M rt v, N y y0. U>Y. Y' m~ mV'a h6Mh °c a o. Y c m r c ~° d c n m h wm Y N M F S ~aJ X m N 3~ 0 m m rt m ry w n Y Y O N 1• °i Y y p m !~ m Y Y ft M m rt 3 m °' ~i ~ n ° °c c n ~ rt'n m } oY ee amra m ~ m ~- o • n > >Yn O q CY.H q ON brtq x OYC w r~ o~u n w n h> h h w Y rt m Y o m m o a. M d o o n > m c~ >n.. n>.. o yu m n 11 rtm m yNpm yry m m w M1 O O m O 3 O w O < O~ O u M V H< 'O 9 A rt 9 m /t ~ m wON (mI OY mMA~ Op {mi m•p ~ S n O O m O O v M O Y g O o' m m 3 • b> • S Y P 3 b C (1 ry O o Y r R B y > m Y ^ n u~ • h > O q F H '' 6 N ~1 0.~ W O rt O O O O W> g9 w F' G M rt i ml (1 mi > ~ rt N q q q q q M q N q C w m Y O Y Y. Y •O G q !~> > Mm w mm Y'; S> > S O> Yp µ5 6> m W M O V Y M vo w' ~c' $°m uw °o °ou d ~ o ~ c Y M1 ^ N rt N n m w h w ~ ~ b o ~ m > > n rt m ~ o ~ ° ~ m h n o > n '„ D r ry Y s o Y x o M q r ~ ° ° ~ $ . y a > ~e n v ~ o a e > o ~ o ~ 3 o na h Y' h ~" F Y~ µ ry K 6 N O O w µV m o Y Y9 n ~ m M9 n n a m M'O o F m ~ Y ~ ' n n ~ ~ o ~ q a w n ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ r a w n nrt n n n > c v M X ry 'p h W N > > > > m ° w w a a m > Y P f.n Nm A q 09 x a U C b u O O O N E P mti O 0.W P P P G E G 4 O O O V Y N U C V 4 Y C m E o o o e f e w ~ V 4H w E iE - E P 4W q 6W IE 4W q E p~ N O O Y O O i O O O~ Y n 4 3 0 4 Y a 0. O O .~ 9 m U C V lTl V U O Y q m rn w w q~mu un N 4 M q 4 mMCti Y E W ~ q q E C 44 O 40 m+1 ~ ym' C O P O C G q o 0 $ M 1 D T M O H m M m m m~N Y q C m C C 4 C N N H U m U q 9 m P m q P rl m V q U p K p W p p W W p R N 9 n 4V N TO 9 9 0 m W 9 I„ Pn Pn tl E m V m q N m u V Y 'T n O m 0 m Q 0 n/ ~ J M Y ~ W H E U p V A M n P+'+~Y IP mn UO w O+~ CwV m O C O 4 N q~N > O 1 V O G .S n U n V Y .i m 4 4 ~e m H m 4 O p V~ ~ C U w w 9 O U 4 N C n u C I m O Y O N u i . V p U> C C O O q u n m'O m a q 9 n U m H m U'O O m O n C OIU b q.01 no m mw U H~.1 u0~ u on O'Y m g 4 4 W> m o o u ~ D C m .~ > N u e» U V H m $ U m m a P C N C E ti .-~ ~.~ N 4 i V q O 4 vn O L C ~ ~ m c 4 E u O 0 c 0 O$ ox mx H M U H ry Y N 6 E 4J O M r'1 2 N N C ~ +1 q m q N 9 pWA nY pu0 uo 0.44 9D ? ~ P sm+ q c ~ 9 H +~ ~ O F 4 0 M Uu n m m ~1 H ` O q „ L 0. O qJ C q d qG 4G 4C4 @ M g n `mo p w O' P V U y N q E yC ~ ~ N C •~ P . U 9 fl{ w n O q O L O E . i 4 4~n M 1~ yy 9 w E ~ T 21 O 4 0 / O V W m m {~ •1 m L ~O L a 4 A EO U 4 q V u M u g m O U q O m V 4 YY m G O wuu g q W C 6 m N P V c C >~ yy q U u y H N 0 q V•-rw l y K UIYC SNV NU qq K.u~l Hv A~d9 @q m C E Y >~ 9 Y T N fl YNgYn qP ONNFPUUu uV~Oif me C 4 Nm061 GU~+m WNYi14CgY r H L .1 +I N m 9 q ~-I m o.~n 4~m~ cu Z E m n g 9 M N m mGH~I d~EG LN n +pl. Y n 4 T Y 4 m N 7 -> 4 D-J onaaUnmWN u m G N a O m t7 T a h i E W ^J u E C ~ c _ ]I F 4 O U m a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECRLYST FOILM (Part II - Initial Study) Section III AttdChment APPLICATION: GPA 91-04A NOTE: On August 12, 1991 the San Bernardino eoazd of Supervisors certified the •'Re gional Air pual ity Plan EIR, San Bernardino County - Cities". That Environmental Impact Report addressed the environmental issues relating to the adoption of the County Regional Air Quality Plan on which the Rancho Cucamonga Air Quality Element is based, as is this envizo nmental ana}ysis. The EIR addressed Co urty-wide concerns which in the more varied conditions of the County were considered significant. Analysis at the smallez City scale did not necessarily portray similar impacts at the same level of significance. III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation (Narrative description of environmental responses, Section II) 3h. Natar The EIA identified significant amounts of water would need to be used to control dust generated at construction sites in order to implement the dust cort rol policies of tRe element. Since the City is subject to high winds and construction dust is already recognized as a significant problem, control measures using Nater are already in place. Any increase in similar dust control measu zee should not result in a significant increase in water usage above what is presently being used. The added use of chemical soil ana dust binders may help in limiting the necessity for substantial increases in water usage to limit construction dust. Mitigation Measures: TRe use of chemical soil and dust binders should be included as mitigation measures as identified in the EIR. The EIR lists potential increases in urban areas wastewater as affecting [he i of rant ru ctuzes capacity. The potential increase in the City would not be sufficient by itself to greatly affect the wastewater infrastructure, but significant increases from the entire west end of the County might push the amounts beyond capacity. Mitigation Measure: Aggressive water conservation policy as mentioned in the EIR. 9a.- Sd. Plant aad Animal Lifa - The EZR iden[if ied the potent iai effect on plant and animal life by dirt urbinq or eliminating habits is a, a result of construction to implement the land use provisions of the element. In the City, the present land use policies, which do not necessarily concentrate development as would the policies of the AQ eleme ne, do ncc necessarily have less of a potential to disturb habitats. TRe refo re, any increased pnt ant ial to negatively affect p18nt and animal hab itat9 should be considered very slight. GPA 91-04A En vi ronhien tal Checklis [, Part IS 1 of 5 pages The City presently has no land use designation which specifically preserves agricultural land. Therefore, any change in land use policies to increase land use intensity in concentrated lover ions cannot negatively affect the existing plans for development of agricultural land. Mitigation Measures: As is the current development review process, the City shall consider sensitive environments by preserving these areas when possible. Pro iect specific mitigation will be required to ensure preserver ioa. 6a. No ia• - The EIA assumes that redistributed residential density and activity, construction of adtlitional transportation infrastructure, and a cedist ribut ion of urban vehicle Craffic are expected to result from implementation of the transportation improvement programs outlined in the AQMP. The resultant construction act ivi[y may increase noise levels tempora cily due to housing, business, transit line, antl freeway const ruct ior.. The degree and frequency of increased noise levels should not be significantly diffe cent than that experienced at the present level of construction in the City. While the element provisions may result in significant development of different projects with an aim to reduce air pollution, the pace of [his construction should not significantly accelerate the current pace of development. Any noise increase should be minimal when compared to that of the City's current level of development activity. Mitigation Measure: Continue to anf oree the City's noise abatement cegulat ions. 8. Lod Oaa - Alternative work schedules and locations to reduce vehicle use may require general plan land we and development district changes. This, as explained in the EIR, is [he result of changing business operations ir. response to sic quality regulations (parking limitations, etc.l. Socioeconomic distribution of telec onvnuting opportunities may 6e uneven and result in the need for work centers not necessarily distributed evenly in the County and City. This may cause adjustments/shifts in traditional lands use relationships to improve jobs/housing balance in certain areas and respontl to new transit routes. Because the pace of land use shifts and development are not expected to significantly accelerate the current pace of development, the impacts are not expected to be significant. Mitigation Measures: Project specific mitigation will be required as land use changes are enacted. Land Use Amendments will be considered to adjust to [he affects of new transit routes and parking limitation. 9. Natural Renourcae - Implementation of many land use, gro~eth management, and tra nspoc[ation measures will change current land .: se distribution and relationships. As growth and accompanying residential acd commercial development, along with highway and transport anon imp roveme ncs occur, pressure will exist tv develop land currently designated as ag ricu l[uce or open apace. Since more efficient use of existing developed and undeveloped land is expected from changes in land use relationships, the impact on 1a r,d resources is not expected to be more significant than would be expected u;dec cuzcent land use provisions. GPA 91 -04A Environmental Checklist, Part ZI 2 of 5 pa qs.s Mitigation Measures: Project specific mitigations to preserve open Space u ill be =equixed. TRe substitution of petroleum based fuels by cleaner fuels will cause the accelerated use of the cleaner fuel resources, such as natural gas, and reduce their abundance. Mitigation Measures: Promote the use of energy efficient re siden[ia1 and conrne rcial appliances and conservation efforts to help reduce the potential increase in natural gas use. 10a. Risk of IIpa~t - The substitution of alte cnative cleaner fuels, such as natural gas and methanol, would be required or encouraged by several of the transportation provisions proposed. More natural gas and methanol will therefore need to be transported. Natural gas - In the event of art upset during its transportation, natural gas is safer than upsets of liquid fuels (gasoline and methanol) because natural gas is lighter than air. As a result, fine danger associated with liquid fuels spills will be lessened because less of it will be transported. Dist cibution of out of aces natural gas would be safer and more efficient by pipeline into the County. Mitigation Measures: Tha use of proper storage and handling can mitigate much of the ri9k presented by natural gag. Project specif is mitigation me as axe s, as identified in environmental assessments, will help in Che proposal of appropriate mitigation measures. Methanol - Increased volumes of methanol fuel, which is highly flammable, transported in and distributed in the City and County may increase the risk presented by fuel use. In addition, [he handling of methanol raises several safety issues somewhat similar to gasoline and Some dissimi ler. Substituting methanol for conventional flammable fue19 is not likely to cequ ire installation of atldi[ional fire protection facilities. However, the Fire D fists ict may need to augment protection capabilities in response to new methanol seoxage facilities. Mitigation Measures: Promote the education of Safety engineering cent cols, handling procedures, and transportation/storage methods for methanol fuels. Project specific mitigation measures, as identified in environmental assessments, will help in the proposal of appropriate mitigation measures. 11. Yopulat SOU - Modified work schedules to reduce vehicle miles may indi xecily encourage population grouch in the suburban and urbanizing portions of the County. This potential uoultl not seem to significantly affect the City, however, as much of the residential and business/industrial centers wee already planned or developed. Significant changes due to increased population pressures are anticipated in poet ions of the County east of the City. S iynif icant changes to the anticipated population within the City would necessitate substantial shifts in the land use designations, which is not anticipated. CPA 91 -04A fnvi ronmen[al Checklist, Part ZZ 3 of 5 pages 12. Housing - Growth management of the housing/jobs balance would impact the availability and distrihut ion of new units as ue 11 as the cost of new and existing Rousing. Its effect would primarily be realized in the County areas, but coultl be evident to some extent in the City. Roos inq could become more costly in the City as more jobs become available and incentives/disincentives limiting cormmte distances are enacted. This effect may be counterbalanced to some extent by commuters to the City switching to employment closer to home. Mitigation Measures: The City, through the Redevelopment Agency, is in the process of developing an Affordable Nousi ng St za to gy which will provide housing incentives and money for low cost Rousing development. The Stale density bonus provisions will also be available to encourage low cost housing. 13a 6 d. Transportation/Circulaiioa - Truck dispatching, rescheduling and rerouting will result from measures designed to spread work trips over a longer period to reduce peak-period congestion. This could result in inc reasetl work trips in off-peak hours in some specific locations. Reduction in truck accident rates is exaected as a result of such measures. Mitigation Measures: Minimize peak Rour restrictions to the sRortest time possible. 13b. In response to changing work centers, parking facilities may need to be redistributed and park and ride lots may be provided within the City. Reduction of parking availability by limiting supply and/or high cos[ could cause businesses to lose convenient auto access. Mitigation Measures: parking acc onaaodat ions will be eva luatetl on a case-by- case basis with project specific mitigation required as needed. 13c. Increased telecommut inq will result in ceduced peak-Rour congestion and a lteznative work week schedules and flextime arrangements can provide decreases in VMT of 6.8 percent and vHT of 8.6 percent County-wide. Alternative short trip generation as a result of these commvt ing changes :coy result in local traffic increases. Mitigation Measures: Land use an3 development plans will continue t: provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian options for short trips. 14b. Public Satrolcea - Parking management and auto use restrictions car, cause changes in Graff is flow around husy job, event, and retail centers. TR is would result in tha need for additional police enforcement and Graf', i~ direction [o successfully implement such pcogrems. Mitigation Measures: Adequate public notice of the establishment c. new parking and traffic regulations, supplemented by clear, permanent signs` w help educated motorists to avoid the restricted areas. Follow-up wich st;:nq enforcement measures, such as fines and towing, will help deter pcte nt :a'. violators and minimize the number of officers needed For enforcement. 18. Aeethetioe - The EIR stated that there may be some negative a=_s r. Ce'.,[ impacts as a result of tallec and more densely Constructed developments. City's design standards will ensure that all aesthetic considerations a;~ included with all new development to ensu ce very little negative impact. GPA 91 -09A Environmental Checklist, Ya rt ZZ 4 of 5 pa ,e; 19. xrcroation - The General Plan Provides policies for the development of zec real Tonal facilities needed for the City based on population. Since significant increases in population project Tong within the Ci[y are not anticipated, additional recreation facilities should not be needed. Alternative recreation activities may be needed if differing population concentrations result from land use adjustment within the City. However, the need to adjust recreational facilities to meet changing population needs would not seem to be as significant es might 6e expected in the larger County area. 20. Cultural Raaouzcae - There is no greater potential for disruption of Archaeological/Paleontologica l/Historic resources Chan exists under present land use and circulaCion plans. Any new development oz program of development will still need to be reviewed under the City's current processes which are designed to identify potential resources and protect them through project specific mitigat ion measures. 21b. Mandatory 7ladiaga of aigalEScaac~ - Short term goals to incrementally reduce the amount of air emissions can, in the long run, increase development pressure beyond what is preae nt ly forecast. This coultl occur iF the Southern California area, as a result of reducing air pollution, becomes a more attractive place for people to live. Such an outcome could stretch the acea's environmental re sou Ices Deyond sustainable levels. GPA 91 -09A Environmental Checklist, Fart TJ 5 of 5 pages Rancho Cucamonga General Plan AIR QUALITY ELEMENT BACRGROUND_BTATEMENT Aic Quality ie considered within the Pub lie Health and Safety Super- Elemeni because the levels of air contaminants in Rancho Cucamonga frequently are unhealthy. This ie only partially due to pollutant sources in and near Rancho Cucamonga but ie primarily due to son 0ernardino County's location downwind of the majority of air pollutant sources in the South Coast Air Basin. The air quality in San Bernardino County is a result of a unique eombinat ior. of factors; air flow patterns and emission sources, born local and those Socated through the region, reau It in some of the worst air quality in the nation. San Bernardino County regularly exceeds et ate and federal air quality etantlartle for Ozone (03) and Particulate Matter (PM10). Exceedancee are acute during summer months when onshore wintl petterna transport pollutants from the western portion of the South Coast Air eosin, notably Loe Angeles and Orange Count iea and combine with local sources. San Bernardino County records the moat sever violations of air quality etandarde for Ozone and PM 10 in the summer months relative to the rest of the air basin. REGULATORY FRA2IEWDRE The Clean Ait Act, promulgated in 1970 and emended twice thereafter (including the recent 1990 amendment), establishes the framework Ear modern air pollution control. Tha Act directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish ambient air etandarde for six pollutants: Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen Dioxide, Particulate Hatter and Sulphur Dioxide. The standards (NAAQS) are divitled into primary and secondary etandarde; the Eotmer are set eo protect human health within en adequate margin of safety and the latter to protect environmental values such as plant and animal life. According to the Act, states are requ iretl to submit State Implementation Plane (SIP) for areas [hat exceed the NAAQS, or nonattainment areas. The SIP, which ie reviewed and approved by the EPA, must demonstrate how the federal at andarda will he achieved, Failure to submit a plan or secure approval could lead to denial of federal funding and perm ire foc such improvements ea highway construction and sewage treatment plants. Zn cases where the SIP is submitted but fails to demonstrate achievement of the etandarde, the EPA is directed to prepare a Federal Implementation Plan. In addition to the six pollutants regulated by federal legielat ion, the California Clean Air Act establishes etandarde for Hydrogen Sulphide, Sulphates and Vinyl Chloride. Responsibility EOr achieving these standards (which are more stringent than federal standards) ie placed on the California Air Resources Board and local air pollution control d~~ rOR DIS~U$SION PURPOSES ONLY Exhibit "B AZR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 2 dietricta. District plane for nonattainment areas moat be designed to achieve e 5 percent annual reduction in total district emissions. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is, in turn, incorporated into the SIP. With the aim of complying with all federal atandarda by 2007, the South Coast Air Quality Management Diet rict (SCAQMn) and Southern California Aseocia[lon of Governments (SCAO) jointly prepared the 1989 Air Quality Management Plan (AgMP). TRe Plan calla for implementation of ru lee and regulations by the Air Resources eoard, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Environmental Protection Agency and local juriadictiona. The AQMP calla upon local governments to take re eponsibility fnr 8 percent of the total required reduction regionwide in amiss ions from reactive organic gases and oxides of nitrogen. Specifically, local governments are asked to implement appropriate control measures contained in the AQMP to achieve tRLa reduction. Several mea9urea direct local government to adopt an Air Quality Element or ire equivalent into ire General Plan. SE all cE the applicable control measures are not implemented, the air quality etantlarda cannot be acRievetl. In this event, the ex Set ing moratorium on location of stationary sources in the bee in will be continued and federal funding and other permits may be denied until the atandarda are met. In an effort to comply with federal and at ate regulations, and to improve air quality in the county and region, this Air Quality Element hoe been adopted, PRINCIPLES The guiding principles behind Che adoption of this element are as follows: 1. Air quality and Economic Growth Achieve air quality improvements in ouch a way that continued economic growth can be au stained. .. Market Zncent Sues and Regulations Achieve necessary sic quality related life style and economic changes through marKet incentives where feasible and through regulatory measures where necessary. DRAF? OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AZA QOALZTY ELEMENT Page 3 GOALS OBSECTIVES AND POLICIES Because the air quality problem is larger than any one jur iedict ion, the San Bernardino County Regional Air 4uaLity Element (RAQE) inc lodes goals, policies, and programs which have been acceptetl by the fifteen cii iee in the San Bernardino County poctron of the South Coast Air eaein. These consensus goals, polic iea, and programs provide a common foundation for coortlinated action. The Air Qual iiy Element for the City of Rancho Cucamonga ie based on the RAQE, and has been adapted into the goals, objectives, and polic iee that reflect and meet local needs. TOPIC 1 GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES GOAL 1 Effective coordination of sir quality improvement within the portion of the South Coa et Air Basin in San Bernardino County and improved air quality through reductions in pollutants from Orange and Loe Angeles counties. objective 1.1 Eetablieh Coordinated Apocoach Because air quality can beet be addreeeetl in a cooperative manner by all affected juriedict ions, the City will coordinate with other jurtedictions in San Bernardino County to establish parallel air quality plane and implementation programs ae outlined in the following polic iee. Policie e: 1.1.1 Adopt local air quality plane based on the San Bernardino County/Cities Regional Air Quality Plan. 1.1.2 Eetablieh an ongoing air quality implementation and referral process within the San Bernardino County portion of the South Coast Air Basin, adapting it as necessary to local circumstances, resources and procetluree. objective 1.2 Integrate With Related Procrame Becau ee other mantl at ed programs have similar and opposing cequ iremente, the City will coordinate a process to integrate related functional programs' lmplementat Lon, monitoring and reporting ae outlined in the following policies. DRAF? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AIR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 4 Policies: 1.2.7 Establish a coordination process for relating parallel air qua Lity improvement actions undertaken as part of other regional or countywide plans. 1.2.2 Participate with SAN BAG in defining and implementing a Conyestion Management Program for San Bernardino County. 1.2.3 Eatablish and maintain an implementation/monitoring system devised as part of the Air Quality Plan preparation. Sntegrate with monitoring and reporting systems required for purposes which overlap with the Air Quality Plan. Objective 1.3 Affect Source GurSSdSctions Because air quality is a regional problem requiring regional solutions, the City will work with and encourage San Bernardino County to cooperate actively with Los Angeles, Orange, and l;i vexside counties to comprehensively improve air quality at the emission source outlined in the following policy. Policy: 1.3.1 Aid in the establishment of a communication network with key elected officials and staff involved in air quality planning in Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties as the basis for identiEyin9 and implementing parallel measures of mutual benefit. Objective 1.4 En coura ge Cortmunity Participation Because alleviaClon of air quality problems requires action on the part of all County residents, the City shall involve environmental groups, the business community, special interest groups, and the general public in the formulation and implementation of programs which effectively reduce airborne pollutants as outlined in the following policy. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES C~N~~ AZR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 5 Policy: 1.4.1 Design and conduct efforts to involve the public and affected(int erected parties in the adoption of Local air quality plane and implementation of air quality imprav¢ment programe through ouch acttone ae: o conducting Public Forums; o Est abliehinq Communication and Education Programs; o Providing written briefs to local ree idente and Dueineeeea; o Conducting Planning Commiae ion/City Council public workshops; and o Utilizing a variety of media forma designed Co maximize citizen involvement. Objective 1.5 s o t I et' A h Because utilization of numerous means of improving air quality will 6e necessary to meet attainment requirement e, the City will atlvocate and support innovative strategies to Lmprove air quality ae outlined in the following policies. Poiicy: 1.5.1 Support new approae nee to improving sic quality through: o supporting legislation; o Cooperating with regional hodiee; o Establishing pilot programe; and o Participating in private/public partnerships where Financially feae ible. TOPIC 2: GROUNO TRANE PORTATTON COAL 2 A diverse antl efficiently operated ground transportation sya[em which generates the minimum feasible pollutants. sUBTOPIC Z.1 MOTOR VEHICLE UBE (rncludee care, trucks, motorcycles) DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AIR QUAL ZTY ELEMENT Page 6 Objective 2.1.1 E1' S t V h' 1 T 'ne Because elimination of vehicle trips (VT) is one of the moat effective way to reduce airborne emissions, the City shall use incentives, regulations, and/or Transportation Demand Management in cooperation with other juriadictiona Ln the south Coast Air Basin to encourage rideaharing, mass transit use, and al[eenate modes of transportation, and thereby, eliminate vehicle trips which would otherwise be made as outlined in the following polio iee. Polio iee; 2.1.1.1 Establish and implement a Tranepo rtat ion Demand Management Program. 2.1.1.2 Define and implement Motor Vehicle limitation procedures in selected areas and at se leered times, pcov ided that adequate alternative transportation modes are available. 2.1.1.3 Establish intentivea and/oc raga latione to eliminate work trlpe. Objective 2.1.2 Reduce Vehicle Milae Traveled sec au se reduction of vehicle miles traveled (NMT) will reduce mobile source em iseione, the City will use incentives, regulations, and/or Traneportat ion ^emand Management in cooperation with other juriadictiona in [he South Coast pir Basin to reduce the vehicle mLlee traveled for motor veh is lee tripe which still nerd to be made as outlined in the following policies. Polio ie e: 2.1.2.1 Eata6liah and implement a Tcanspoxtat ion Demand Management Program. 2.1,2.2 Eatabl ish and maintain telecommunications Strategies to reduce the length of motor veh is le Gripe. 2.1,2,] Define and Lmplement motor vehicle limitation procedures in selected areas and at selected timee~ provided that adequate a Lternat ive transportation modes are available. ~~~ I"'OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AIR QUALITY ELEHENT Page a SUBTOPIC 2,2 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT objective 2.2.1 Mod ifv work Schedu Lee Eec auee decreased traffic congestion results in decreased emiaeione, the City will promote and establish modified work schedules which reduce peak period motor vehicle travels outlined in the following policy. Policies: 2.2.1.1 Eata6lieh incentives and/or regu let ions to spread work tripe over a longer period to reduce peak period congestion. Objective 2.2.2 E C bl' h H' h O e V hl 1 IHOVI Lan a Because HOV lanes help to reduce traffic congestion, the City will participate in efforts to achieve increased designation, canatruct ion, and operation of HOV lanes on freeways in Loe Angeles, orange, B ivera Lde, and San Bernardino cou nt iea ae outlined in the following policy. Policy 2.2,1.1 Cooperate with San 6ernard ino County, SANBAG, sCAG, antl atljacent count Sea in expanding HOV lanes on the freeway system within [he affected counties. Objective 2.2.3 Intec Yate Conaeet ion Manaaament_ProOram B ecauaa many of the pr ovieiona of the Congestion Management Programs are the same or complementary to air quality programs, the City will integrate overlapping components of the State-mandated Congestion Management Program and the Regional Air Quality Plan with the City's local Air Quality Element. Policy: 2.2.3.1 Participate with SANBAG In defining and implementing a Congestion Management Program for San Bernacd lno County to insure appropriate coordination with air quality planning. ~`~~ OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AIA QUALITY ELEMENT Page A objective 2.2.4 Eatablia C t' ~e eecauee congestion fees can discourage vehicle tripe thereby reducing emissions, the city may Iona ider participating in a regional program of market based intent Lves and dis iota nt ivea to relieve peak hour/peak direction congestion within highly congested travel corridors ae outlined on the following policy. Policy: 2.2.4.1 Participate with San Bernardino County to initiate a pilot program to explore; jointly with Los Angeles, Orange, and Rivera ids cou ntiea; feasible methods and implementor ion strategies for levying of Congestion Peee Eor peak hour/peak direction use of highly congested travel corridors, particularly those which generate em isaione trnneported to son Eeznard ino County. SUBTOPZC 2.3 E%PANDED TRANSIT SYSTEMS AND SERVICES Objective 2.3.1 E p tl T 't th C t Because alternative forms of transit are needed to encourage or allow the reduction of low occupant vehicle use, the City will encourage transit authotit ies in of forts to expand bus, rail, and other forme of transit within the San Bernardino County region of the South Coast Air Basin ae outlined in the following pol is iea. Policies: 2.3.1.1 Participate with public transit providers serving San Bernardino County in a cooperative program to increase transit services with ez iating equipment and expand services through transit facility improvements without reducing local revenue. 2.3.1.2 Coordinate with public transit providers in she ia' efforts to increase funding for transit improvements that will provide viable alternative means of travel. 2.3.1.3 Plan for intraregional commuter and main line rail service development including convenience far ilitiee at rail elope. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AIR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 9 2.3.1.4 Develop and S~pUUat design standards that promote access to transit facil Sties. Objective 2.3.2 E nd T e't i th Ai Ea in Because reduction of interregional tripe will reduce vehicle tripe and thereby reduce mobile emissions, the City will promote expansion of all forme of transit in the urbanised portions of Sen Bernardino, Orange, Loe Angeleer and Riverside Counties as outlined by the following policies. Policies: 2.3.2.1 Support the expansion of intearegional commuter and main line rail services, particularly Chcee 1lnking with deetinatiore in San Bernardino County. 2.3.2.2 Support public transit provLde[s in efforts to increase funding for transit improvements that will provide viable alternative means of travel. 2.3.2.3 Jointly support efforts to establish a regionwide bus pees. SUBTOPIC 2.4 NON-MOTORIZED MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION Objective 2.4.1 Promote Non-Motorized Trenem[tat ion Because reduced emissions are promoted by the use of bicycles and pedestrian facilities ae alternative forma of transportation, the City shell provide bicycle and pedestrian pethwaye to encourage non- motorized tripe as outlined by the following policy. Policies: 2.4.1.1 Develop sad bplawnt et andarde and guidelines for incorporating support facilities into development plena Eor increased bicycle snd pedestrian routes that link appropriate activity centers to nearby ree idential development. DF:AF7 FoR Discuss~~E~ra PURPOSES ONLY AIR QNALITY ELEMENT Page ID SUBTOPIC 2.5 PARKING MANAGEMENT Objective 2.5.1 Manage Park inc SuPbly Because reduction of parking guar Labil Sty discourages low occupancy vehicle uae, the City may manage parking supply to encournge high occupancy vehicle uae and vi ab l¢ alternate modes of transportation, end to discourage single occupancy motor vehicle uae, while ensuring that economic development goals will not be aacr ificed ae outlined in the following policy. Policy: 2.5.1.1 Establish chart and long-term parking management etrategiee at governmental antl private facilit iee in ways Thai discourage single occupancy motor vehicle usage and reward high vehicle occupancy rates without placing the City at an economic developmani disadvantage. Objective 2.5.2 Encou rase Market Intent ruse/Disincentives Because changing the market value for parking discourages vehicle usage, the City will promote a regional approach to increasing parking costa in order tc discourage Low vehicle occupancy as outlined in the following policy. Policies: 2.5.2.1 Study parking management etrategiee for governmental and private Eacilit iee in ways that discourage single occupancy motor vehicle usage and reward high vehicle occupancy rat ea without plating the City at an economic diaadva ntage in enticing jobs. SUPTOPIC 2.6 CLEANER FUELS Objective 2.fi.1 Support Leoiel at ion Because vehicle emissions Erom foeail fuels tau ae a sign if Scant proportion of the area's air quality tlegradat ion, the City will promote at ate and federal legislation which would improve vehicle/ traneporiat ion technology and which would eatabl ieh d if Eerent Sal pricing mechanisms t0 assess a fair cost of emissions ae outlined in the following policies. ~aW~ FOR DISCU89fpN PURPOSES QNLy AIR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 11 Policies 2.6.1.1 Support legislation to stimulate the development of practical clean fuel vehicles. 2.6.1.2 Support etnte legielai ion wnirn would eetablie h: - Emiee ion Feea on gaealine products and Differential Registration Feea on motor vehicles according to the emiee ion levels that they are designed to produce. - Include exploration of an option that imposes pollution fees on individual vehtclee at time of mandated smog inspections, bneed on actual vehicle performance. 2.6.1.3 Support legislation which lightens iapravaa the existing vehicle inspection program, both in terms of standards to be mat and requirements fot compliance. ~9upyort private-sector-fisaaced eoLOr vahSCL bap-back prograst. objective 2.6.2 institute Clean Fuel 5vetems Because gaverrunent vehielea contribute to vehicle tripe and vehicle mi lea traveled, the City will investigate and consider the use of clean fuel systems on new local government fleet vehielea ae outlined in the following policy. Policy 2.6.2.1 Inet itute coat effective clean fuel systems on new and replacement local governmen[ fleet vehicles. TOPIC 3: AIR TPANSPORTATION While Rancho Cucamonga does not have nny eirporte within its bounder iee, the community ie s few miles Erom Ontario International Airport. This section addressee ground access ie ease which can effect sit quality in the area. coAL 3 Minimum fees in le emissions from air carrier airports. t' rl~ F~ FoR Discu~,!o~ PURPOSES ONLY AIR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 12 objective 3.1 Promote Improved Cround Access Because traffic congestion can be significant in proximity to airports, the City will support conditioning of air carrier airports upon inclue ions of plane for improved grountl access ae outlined in the following policy. Polley: 3.1.1 Support Bet abliahment of regulations requiring air carrier airport operators to obtain permits based on approved plane for trip reduction, facility design, and access improvement a. TOPIC 4: LAND USE GOAL d A pattern of lantl u9e9 which can be eff is ient ly served by a diversified transportation system and land development projects which directly and indirectly generate the minimum feasible air pollutants. Objective 4.1 Manage Growth Because congestion resulting from increased growth is expected, the City will manage growth by ensuring she timely provision of inftastructure to serve new development as outlined in the following policy. Policy: 6.1.1 Incorporate phasing policies and requirements in the General Plan and development plena Co achieve timely provision of infrastructure (particularly tranaportat ion Eacilit ice) to serve development. Objective 4.2 Balance Growth Becaa9e a more even distribution between jobs and housing will result in fewer vehicle tripe and vehicle miles traveled, the City will improve the balance between jobs and hou Bing in ortlei to create a more efficient urban form as outlined in the following policies. ~~~f 1 FOR DISCUSSION PURPpSES C?D~;_Y AIR QUALITY ELEHENT Page 13 Policies 4.2.1 Utilize new development and redevelopment proj act reviews and actions to improve jobs/houaing balance. 4.2.2 Improve jobs/housing balance at a eubregional level in relation to maj ox activity centers ae new development occurs. 4.2.3 Continue support for and cone ider expansion of the CLOUT demonstration project to incorporate: Incentive oriented tax credits, loan programs, small bueinesa development programs, and complementary land use policies, all aimed at improving the jobs/houaing balance in the western San Bei nardino/eastern Loe Angeles Cou ntiee area. 4.2.4 Develop and adopt an ngreement among the participating jurisdictions ae to mutually acceptable approaches to improve and maintain jobs/houaing balance. Objective 4.3 Protect Pooulatio ne Sensitive to Containments Because some land uaee support populet ions that are eapeciaily 9eneit ive to air contai:unante (each ae echoo le and hospitals) the City will support a regional approach to regulating the location and design of lend uaee which are eepeclally aene hive to air pollution ae outlined in the following policy. Policy: 4.3.1 Pert icipate wish the SCAQMD in jointly formulating appropriate standards for regulating the location and protection of sensitive receptors (achoole, day care facilities, hospitale, and the like) from excessive and hazardous emie eione. Objective 4,4 Int strata Plannino Pro teas 9ecauee interne lot ionehip of land uee and trenaport at ion has a eigni ticant effect on air quality, Che city will integrate air quality planning conalderet icne with the land uee and trenepoztation planning and development prose ease ae outlined in the following policy. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ASR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 14 Policy: 4.4.1 Locate and design new development in a manner that w111 minimize direct and indirect emiee ion of air containments. TOPIC 5: PARTICULATE EMISSIONS GDAL 5 The minimum practicable particulate emieeione from the construction and operation of roads and buildings. Objective 5.1 Control Duet Because particulate emieeione exceed Federal and Stake standards Ln the air Daein, the City will reduce particulate emieeione from roads, parking late, vacant lot e, construction sites, and agricultural lands ae outlined in the following policiee. Policiee 5.1.1 Adopt and LplsNnt incentives, regulations, and procedures to manage paved roads eo they produce the minimum practicable level of pariiculetse (12.a (. 5.1.2 Adopt and Leplaant incentives, regulations, and proCetluree to minimize part lculeie emissions during road, perking loi, and building construction. 5.1.3 Adopt and i~pluw! incentives, requlatione, end procedures to control part lculate emieeione from unpaved roads, drives, vehicle maneuvering areas, and perking lots. 5.1.4 Adopt and Lplsesm! Lncant lvae, regal at ions, and procedures to 11mit dust from agricultural lands and operetlons (where applicablej. Objective 5.2 Reduc Emissions from Bu ildino Nateriale/Methods Because part lculate emieeione are affected by the type of motorists ana methods utill zed,. the City will reduce emlee lone from building meterlele end methods which ganarete excessive pollutants ae outlined in the following policy. CRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PUP.POSES On,'LY AIR QUALITY ELEMENT Page 15 Policy: 5.2.1 Adopt intent ives, raga lationa, and procedures to prohibit the use of building materials and methods which generate excessive pollutants. TOPIC 6: ENERGY CONSERVATION GOAL 6 Reduced emieaiona through reduced energy consumption. Objective 6.1 Enerav Cansecvation Because energy sources produce significant amounts of air pollution, the City will reduce energy coneumpt ion through conserver ion impravemeni0 and requirements as outlined in the following policies. Policies: 6.1.1 Implement plans and policies to phase Ln energy conservation improvements through the annual butlget process. 6.1.2 Atlopt incentives and/or regular ions to enact energy conserver ion requirements Ear private development. Objective 6.2 Limit W t [ H t [ E 'e ' Because water heaters emit sit pollu[anta~ the Ciiy will reduce water heating emissions rasa liing Erom swimming pool heaters and water heaters ae outlined in the following policies. Po llcie9: 6.2.1 Adopt intent ives and regulations to reduce em ieeione from swimming pool heaters. 6.2.2 Adopt intent ives and regulations Go reduce emieaione from rea itlent ial and commercial water heating. Objective 6.3 Recvc le wastes Because recycling can reduce the po llutente emitted from generation of new materialer Che City will promote local recycling of wastes and use of recycled materials ae outlined in the following pol Lcy. DRAFT FOR DI3CUS3ION PURPOSES ONLY AIA QUALITY ELEMENT Page 16 poliey: 6.3.1 Implement provisions of AB 939 and adopt incentives, requlat ions, and procedures to specify local recycling requirements, DRAFT FOR DISCUS8ION PURPOSES OhiLY CITY OF RANCHO Cl.'C A:IIONGA STAFF REPORT LATE: November 6, 1991 r - TO: Msyor and Membe re of the City Council Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Orad 9u Llez, City P18nnec 9Y: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: N InFA ON OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT J1ND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03 CITY OF RANCHO cDCAMONDA - A request to add Section 17.0R.04CP and Section 17.08.070E to the Development Code establishing property maintenance atandarda and ongoing maintenance requirements for Multiple Family Dwellings RECOMMENDATION: The Ci[y Cou nc it should give fire[ reading of the title of the attached ordinance and conduct a public hearing to co neidec the adoption of Development Code Amendment 91-03 pertaining to property maintenance for Multiple Family OwelLinge. BACR6RODND: On February 26, 1991, the City Council approved a Aeeolut ion of Intent regarding the future development oC multi-family project a. Ae a cesu Lt, the Planning Commieaion hoe conducted workshops and public hearings to determine the appropriate course of action to implement the Council's goals. 'the Planning Commiaeion determined that several Development Coda amendments xere required, with one element to include the creation of property maintenance standards specif ice lly for Multiple Family Dwellings. Staff drafted two new subsections pertaining to property maintenance antl oresent ed a report at the July 10, 1991, Planning Commiaeion meeting. The Comm ieeion concurred with etaEf'a recommendation and approved Aeeolut ion No. ,:-100 recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 91-03, and making f ind inge in support thereof. ANALYSIS: Current regu lot ions for ree ident ial maintenance do not differentiate between single Eem ily antl multi-family unite. However, the type of maintenance problems that can develop are often very different. This eituat ion often makes it difficult to resolve property maintenance problems on a cone iatent boa is ae multi-family projects. The proposed Development Code Amendment 91-03 would add two new aubsect ions pertaining to property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance regu iremente for Multiple Family dwel lingo. Theee new regulations are intended to meet the following three objectives: 1. To clearly establish the responsibility of a property owner for the continuous maintenance of their ree idant ial pmpertyp 2. That multi-family residential developments must maintain site !, improvements ae they were approved by the Planning Comm ieeion; antl CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MULTI-FAMILY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS November 6, 1991 Page 2 To provide epecif is property maintenance rewirementa for multi-family residential developments. This combination of eat abliehing reeponeib ility, obligating maintenance of approved Bite improvement e, and providing spec if is maintenance requirements creates a workable base for enforcement. Rather than interpreting general Code requ irement a, the Code Enforcement staff can utilize the new Code section a, just as they are written, to convey minimum acceptable standards to property owners and on-e its managers. CONDITIONS OP APPROVAL: In addition to spec if is maintenance requirements, the Amendment also requires adherence to the Cond itione of Approval imposed by the City during the Development Review process. Conditions of Approval establish the type, size, and location of amenit ice, recreational facilities, landscaping materia le, ate., and will now also be used ae a tool to ensure on-going maintenance of these amenitie e. New projects could now also be required to provide a maintenance plan to be followed by the property management personnel. Tha plan would include information about required site improvements and proviaione to meet the maintenance requirements of the proposed Development Code Amendment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advert iced ae a public hearing in the Inland Val Daily Bulletin newspaper. Recently, a letter was received from Dutton and Associates regarding the proposed ordinance, suggesting flexibility in application cE the regulations (see Exhibit ^C,^), No other correspondence has been received to date. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: St afE hoe completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and concluded that the proposed Amendment would not create significant adverse environmental impacts. The Planning Commission hoe concurred with these find inge and hoe recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration. CONCLVSZON: Pursuant to the City Cou ncil'a Resolution of Intent, the proposed Amendment provides a means to improve the quality of multi-family resLdential developments within the City. The Planning Commlee ion hoe conducted a public hearing and approved a Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 91-03. Adoption of the attached ordinance would therefore be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, !~~ B cad Bul er city Planner RB: ALA AtCachmente: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission SteEf Report, July ]0, 1991 Exhib Lt "e" - Minutes from Planning Commission Meeting, July 10, 1991 Exhibit "C" - Letter from Dutton and Aeeoci atee Exhibit "D^ - Planning Comm ieaion Resolution No. 91-lOC City Council Ordinance 273 CITY OF R~\CHO CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT ~~,;~ (~'~l - DATE: July 10, 1991 `'' T0: Chairman and MemDeYe of the Planning Commisa ion FROM: Brad eu ller, City Planner BY: Aichdrd L. Alcorn, Code En£Orcement Supervisor SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AS SESSMERT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03 - C_TTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Section 17.08.060-P and Section 17. Oe. 070-E to the Development Code establishing property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance requirements for Multiple Family Dwell in ga. I. BACKGROUND: On February 26, 1991, the City Council approved a Resolution o£ Intent regarding the future development of multi- family projects. Aa a result, staff hoe proceeded with the amendment process as outlined in the March 13, 1997 Staff Report to the Planning Covmiesion. The amendments follow Lhzee separate tracks: 1. Future unit reductions by reducing the amount of vacant multi-family land in the General Plan. 2. Upgrading the City's development and design standards through a package of amendments to the Development Code and io specific and community plane. 3. Upgrading The City's property maintenance regulations through a package of amendments to the Municipal Code. Track 3 19 the aubj ect of this report and proposed Development Code Amendment. II. ANALYSIS: Current regular ions Eor residential maintenance do noc differentiate between single family and multi-family units. However, the type of maintenance problems that can develop are often very different. Unlike a single family home where one person is typically reaponsiDle for the property, multi-£emi ly pro? sets may inVOLVe many individuals xleh various degrees of re sponsibllity. This eituetion often makes it difficult to apply current property maintenance regu lotions on a consistent bas is• To impro~'e this situation, staff is proposing two new au beset ions Eor addition to the Deve lopmenc Code. These new regular ions are intended to meet the following three objectives: CXFG3/%~ PLANNING CONM IS SIGN STAFF REPORT ^CP 91-Oi - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO NGA ,7u ly 10, 1991 Page 2 To clearly establish the responsibility of a property owner For the continuous maintenance of their residential property; 2. That mul ii-family residential developments mu at maintain site improvements as they were approved by the Planning Co®iesion; and To provide specific property maintenance requirements Eor multi-family residential developments. REff SDBBaLTIO~S: The first new subsection would be added to Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code pertaining to site development criteria: Property Maintena nee. Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of all buildings, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking nreas, recreational facilities and other SmprovemenU in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the aurroundin9 area. In additions multi-family residential developments auDject to the development/Design Review process shall malntein site improvements in rnmpliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval imposed by the Planning Co:mniseion. This proposed aubaection is stmt lar to requirements found in the industrial Specific PLan. Ira inclua ion ae a site development requirement lays the groundwork for requiring a program of ongoing maintenance from the inception of a project. As a result, maintenance requlcemente can be addressed during the deai gn phase and more readily be carried over into the completed project The second new aubmection would be added to Section 17.00.070 of the Development Code. This section pertains to general provisions such as signs, vehicle parking, storage, and property maintenance. The new eubcection eetaD lishea additional and specific requirements for the property maintenance of multi-Family dwellings (see attached proposed Ordinance). This new auDeection outlines specific maintenance requirements Eor: But ldinga and structures; 2. Landscaped area; 2ZS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPGRT DCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 3 3. Parking and hardscape areas; 4. Trash enclosures: 5. Gra Ffiti removal; 6. Recreational facilities; and 7. Conditions of approval. These specific requirements will enable the Code Bnforcen~ent staff to more r¢adily convey the minimum acceptable standards of maintenance. Father than interpreting general Code requirements, this new section can be utilized "as is", as a guide for property owners and on-site manegera. C0NDITIa78 OF APPIaDVAL: Zn many ways, the management of multi- family projects ie similar to large commercial de yelopments• The existence of common and public access areas and the demands of many different tenants requires a plan Eor ongoing maintenance and personnel to accomplish the task. This similarity is most clear at the lime of initial plenninq and development when comparlnq aesthetic considerations and site amenities. In considering this problem, it is staff's conclusion that property owners and managers of multi -family projects are not adequately exposed to the initial development criteria. Their ongoing management and maintenance activities are often can ducted independent of the original site development plane. The reauli ie deterioration of the quality appearance of the project ae it was originally conceived. The Conditions of Approval imposed by the Plenninq Commission during the Development/Design Review proceae can be used as a method to ensure continued quality. Inltia lly, new projects could be conditioned to provide a maintenance plan to be followed by the property management personnel. The plan would Sncluda provisions to meet the maintenance requir amen to of the new subsection 17.08.070-E. In addition, the plan cen be used ae a vehicle to inform on -site personnel of the site development pz iorities of that specific project. Issues Such as tree locations, landscaping, building color, site amenities, and the reason for their imporCance can be addreeaed. ODNCLOSIat: The proposed Development Code Amendment and [he use of Conditions of Approval cen improve the quality of mu ltl-family reaadential developments. This Ls accomplished by developing a framework of specific requirements and consSatenC appli ce tion of standards. The improvements achieved are more the reau It of education and moat Coring of conditions than of en £occeme nt 21~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 4 action. It is staff's position that The City has adequate regulations to ensure compliance; what is proposed are regulations and procedures that motivate property owners to meet the requirements by their own efforts. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS EESMENT: Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and concluded that the proposed Amendment would not create ai gnif ieant adverse environmental impacts. If the Planning Coamission concurs wiN these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a Public Hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. To date, no correspondence has been received. V. RBCOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution tern®ending approval of the proposed amendment to the City Council and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respec sub . Brad B er City Planner BB:RLA:ns Attachments: Aeaolution of Approval Proposed Ordinance of Approval 2~~ evani meeting. He <houghc the matter to be an enormous ie sue which ~.+ affect Lh et of the multi-family development within the City and aug etl the matter be nt inu ed to allow further diecu eeicne. Commies inner Toletc •lt Ue iesw• regarding retreat ions ac ilit ie e, building height, and 'itlinq eeparat ion are extremely ort ant. He preferred add it Tonal diecu• • in a workshop setting. Commie inner Vel lefts agreed. Otto Aroutil, Deputy City Planner, Bugg ed the m be coot inued to August 34, 3993, with a workshop to be schetluled p r that time. Chairman McNial reopened the public hearin XOt ion: Moved by Me lc her, •eaonda y To Ltoy, C continue Envirorment al Aalel ement and Development Coda ant 91-02, Enviro ental Ae weement and Etiwanda Speeif is Plan Amendm 91-02A, environmental A aeem/nt and Terra Viet Planned Community nt 91-@, and Envlronmant A/u •ement and Victoria P1anMd Coamuni ndmant 91-02 to August 16, 3991. of ion carried by the fol lowlnq voU• AYBS: COlW NEAS: MCNIEL, XELCHEA, TOLSTOYr VALLETTB NOES: ISSIONERSt NONE i ~~ Q.' ENVIRONNPNTIIL ASSESSMEN'f~10 DPVEt OPMPNT CODE AHPNnHPNT 91-D3 - AANCNO CVCAMONGA - A requu[ tc add Saciion 17.08.040-P and Section 17.08.070-E Lo the Development Coda aatabliahinq proparey maintenance standards and ongoing mainbnanca raga iremmte Eor multiple family awallinga. Richard Alcorn, Coda Entorcamant superv i/or, praunUd the eta Ef report. Commie toner Valletta eked what racouro the Clty would have if maintenance •tantlarda era hat mat. Mr. Alcorn replied that a the etandard• as written it you ld ba a misdemeanor tnfraceion of tN law. Ha aid LMt would permie eha City to proeeeute Lor a violet loo. Xe wid for a ma]or problem, LM City eoWd uu CM abat¢ment proceedings. Ne indicated that typically the City works eo obtain voluntary compliance. Chairman HcNLel felt the adoption of ma inte0ance •tantlarda would ba an opportunity to put the property ownar^ an notice. D1annlnq Ce~lnlon MSnutu + -$- July 10, 1991 27~ _ ~~f {/L~.J/ / Corson iasionsr Melchor asked if the nqu irementa could by equally applicable to common intr[yst subdivielone, each as condominiums. Hr. Aleern teypondyd affirmatively that the requitement• could be applicably to any multi-family. Commissioner Melchor askotl if there will by coma mechanism for notifying each buyer at the rimy of purchasy that each stantlardy vxiet. Hy thought it might be a valuable ynfoecamynt tool to regain property owners/managar• to furnish a copy of tN ordinance to each bMnt or to poet thy ordinance. Mz. Alcorn rcpt Utl that each • nqu iryment <oultl by ineezporated into the candition^ of approval, but ha suggsyNd it not be made part of the Municipal Code. Commissioner vellett• felt such a raga irymynt would nave more strength if it were pert of the Huneipal Cody. Hr. Alcorn rapt ied [hat ii would be difficult to establish She policy a• a dsvelopnynt standard and Shy on-site property manager would not nycsuarily know the nquiresunts. He aid it would tMn involve additional staff time to monitor and regulars the poet Lnq. Hy felt it i• more SmpOrtant to nave [ha proper mainLnancy than to be sun Cnat standards are posted. Commissioner Tolstoy felt LC would be prudent to rsqu iry that information regarding the standards be disclosed in CCiRS tar condominiums or included within rental agrsamenb. Hy tnought ouch ryquirsmynt• should be part of the ordinance in order to givo the City the clout to make sure the standards as distribubd. Commiuionsr Valletta agrpC that Lt would maky !t aster for •taft to receivy input from ryntyrs or condominium owners. Brad BulUr, City Planner, stated it wu • policy question. He asked hoc Ear thy City should qa in "baby-sitting' a project. He aid that generally thy Bevylopment Code sets standards for development but not on implementation. Hs intlicabd that eu![ require dLaUoeun [or such things •• the fruway and tree Fourth Street Roekerueher. commissioner Toleeoy felt that tf tM City nqulne dLelaeure for tM frwway and the Fourth Street Rockerushyr, such dlecloeure may only be made ac the rimy of the initial sale. He fenced such dlscloeurn would not be mady at the time of resale. He thought It important that subsequent buyers an also intormyd. Mr. Buller indicated the bottom line goal U to insure that the property u proparly,malnL fined. Commi a ionyr Tolstoy felt renters would help to see that propertSU an propyrly ma ineeined it they wen aware of the requirement. PLnninq Commiuion Mlnutu -):a- July 30, 199: 2~VI Mr• Bullet acted that the City may be approached by a diag[untled tenant rsquaattnq Chat the Clty file misdemeanor chatge• egainat an owner [or failure to poet iha standards. Ne questioned if the City really wanted eo gat that involved in landlord tenant dieputea. Commiuioner Valletu roponded that the City merely wane to be aura the •tandard• era posted. Chai[man NeNiel opened Che public hearing. TNre were no comments, and Chairman McNiel closed Cha public hating. Ha tared apartment dweller may want the City to arbiirab • myriad of smell !tame in dlspuees with ounare. Ha !bought it would pe utiafactory to advise property owners of the •tantlarda. Ne d1d not want [ha Ctty to ba b[ought into Lhs mLddU of minor d !spate! betwen tenant• and owner. CommUaioner Melchor tali Chairman McNlel had caLSd a valid argument. Me thought ens Commlo ion Could add s posting requlsemant to a spaeific project through conditions of approval if the Commission tali it may bs bensf trial. Coessissioner ToLtoy aoprec Lated conearnf raiud by Cnalrman McN1F1 and Commies Sonar Melchor. Ne did not want to gat the City involved in wtiling conflleG Detwan renters and owners Dut wanted to W wn the City la atlviwd wNn problems ariw beoauq of poor maintenance. CoamloloMr Vall tits agrwd. Mot iont~ Novel by Ta Ltoy, uconded by Val Utb, to recomeend Souanca of Negative Deelaration and adopt the ruolution reeommendlnq approval of ¢nvironmencal Asuoment and Dwelopment Cada Amendment 91-W. Mot ton urr[ed Dy the followlnq vote: AYES: COMNI59IONERS: MCNIEL, MELCNEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA -carried .- s ... . R. ENVIR - A cNldantLQ subdivlalon of 49 •ingle family loi• on 34 a of 1 tM Vary Low Rssldent tat D !street (1-2 dwll its par acct) of th ands 9pael[1e PLn, locaCSd at th watt corner of Suamlt and bast a - APN: 425- lEl-o4, oe, as, and 4I .nd sss-sot-se. suet rata Lwuant• of sties Declaration. AssocLtaO wLCh this projaet L• T[N 1 L 91-15 (CO ....---._-..__.. P lanninq CommiU LOn N1nutN Z7- ,7uly 10, 1991 2So j~&uSrroTN September 25, 1991 Otto IGoutil City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Otto: U~~ 9F RECEGVEO , ~r.,f~.: ~i,, nM SEP 261991 7tglgl~fyf~11i213i4fs 6 1 am sorry for the delay and hope my input is of assistance. [have reviewed the proposed ordinance regarding maintenance requirements for multifamily dwellings. The ordinance appears to cover the primary areas, however, I do have a few suggestions: Section 3:E.l.c." Damage to structures shall be repaired within 30 days from the date of occurrence." There wi116e no problem with minor damage, however, damage which is to be covered by insurance will not be able to be repaired in 30 days. However, work should be able to commence within 30-60 days. Most insurance companies will require three estimates and will also want to perform their own physical investigation prior to the commencement of any repair. Section 3:E.2.c. "Any damaged, dead, diseaud or decaying plant materials shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage." I understand the intent, however, sometimes landscaping is dif5cult to maintain as originally proposed. What looks good on paper is not always practical. By example, residents and visitors have a tendency to shoe t cut across grass and shrub areas, therefore damaging the landscaping by creating a path throu¢h the area. Also last February, alot of landscaping was damaged by a killer frost. In our properly over 90% of what was thought to be lost landscaping actually returned afro r a 90 to l20 day dotmanq. As you probably know, landscaping that returns after a bad freeze is usually healthier and stronger than before. You may want to consider language that would allow a property owner the leeway to provide alternative solutions. Section 3:E.2.e. "Landscape screening materials, such as hedges, shall be pruned to maintain their screening ability." Recently insurance carriers have been requiring us ter eliminate or lower screening barriers because of potential liability. The concern is tli.ir when a screening barrier is created you also create a hidden area where a crime can Irc committed. Zgl t 0~8t Foothill 8oulevaro, Sude 455, Roncho Cucamonga. CA 91 i30 • 714/980-1880 • FAx ' .. ~ki~l/L'~/ ~ t.l. OJIO Krout'I - C'tv f Rn hn C -Set be 23 1991 pew I am somewhat curious on Low the City will enforce this maintenance ordinance and would suggest a common sense provision be added which simply states, "Common sense shall prevail in the application and enforcement of this ordinance." Alot of potential maintenance problems could be solved in the design stage if more importance was placed on quality and durability of materials used rather than the aesthetics. On a different subject, I have been told that the City is going to require multi-family projects to provide washers and dryers in the individual units themselves. I have Lad bad experiences with stacked washer and dryer units, primarily because of misuse by the tenants due to overloading. Also, because washers and dryers are free standing, as are refrigerators, these items have a tendency to disappear. I think you would better serve the tenants and property owner if the City would only require central laundry room facilities. Webb Laundry Company, a nation-wide laundry vendor, recommends one washer and dryer per 8 to t0 units. The nice thing about con4ac6og with Webb Laundry Company is that they are responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the equipment. if you need any further clarification oo the contents of this letter, please feel free to contact me. I truly appreciate this opportunity to contribute. Sincer/el~yy~ bert D. Dutton RDD:bg ZSZ RESOLVT TON NO. 31---ti A RESOLUTION OF THE 2LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA AECOMME NDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03, ADDING A NEW SVBSECTION 1],08.040-P AND A NEW SUBSECTION 1].08.070-E TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ESTABLISHING PAOPEASY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS ANO ONGOING MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MVLTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND HAXSNC FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. wHEAEAS, on the 10th day of July 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly edvart ised public hearing pursuant tc Sact ion 65864 of the California Government code. SECTION 1. The Aanc ho Cucamonga Planning Commission hoe made the following findings: A. That the amsndman[ is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies; and e. That the General Plan Environmental Impact Report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts; and c. No coos[ ential chengu ors proposed in any goal or polio iea which would require ma)ot revisions to the Environmental Impact Report. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning CommL aion has Eound [hat this amandmsnt will not create a significant adve[ae of het on the environment and Mreby neommends to City Council the is wanes o[ a Negative Deelara[ion. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1) That pursuant to Section fi98fi0 to 65855 of the California Government Coda, that CM Planning COmmiu ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby racommwde approval of Development Code Amendment 91-03. 2) TN Planning commiuLOn hereby recomrtende that the City Council approve and adopt Owalopment Code Amendment 91-OJ to modify tM Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. SECTION 3: The Sscratary to this Commission shall .ert ify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T McN ie 1, Chairman ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. -, OCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 2 ATTEST: '-2~' ~' /grad ~ L acre ry I, Srad Sul le r, Seccet ary of eMe Planning Comm iae ion of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart ify that the fosagoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by iba Planning Commiq ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, aG a regular meeting of tna Planning Commix lon held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCN IEL, NELCHER, TCLSTCY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA 2.Su ORDINANCE NO. ~~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN IP., APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03, ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.040-P AND A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the £o11ow1nq proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Development Code") regarding regulations for property maintenance standards Eor multiple family dwellings within residential districts of the City. (ii) At the conclusion of said public heating on July 10, 7997, the Planning Commission adopted lta Resolution No. 91-100 thereby recommending that this Council adopt the proposed Development Code amendments as set forth in this ordinance. (iii) On November 6, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the proposed Development Code amendments ae Set forth herein and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordi nonce have occurred. 8. Ordl nonce. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Subsection 17.08.040-P is hereby added to the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to read, in words and figures, as follows: P. Property Maintenance. Property .owners are respone i6le for the continuous maintenance of all buiidin gs, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking area e, recreational facilities and other improvements in a manner which does not detrart from the appearance of the surrounding area. in addition, Multiple Family Residential Developments subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain site improvements Sn compliance with all applicable conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Comm~.ssir n. 2V~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 91-03 - CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 SEC?ION 3: Subsection 'n •00.070-E is hereby added to the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to read, in words and figures, as follows: E. Multiple Family Welling Maintenance. Tne following maintenance requirements shall be applicable to all Multiple Family Residential Developments in addition to other gen¢ral maintenance provisions of this Code. 1. Buildings and structures: a. Shall not 6e permi t[ed to deteriorate, or remain in an unrepa fired or dilapidated condition; b. Building exteriors shall be maintained, painted or [reared to provide for weather protection; c. Damage to structures she 11 be repaired within 30 days from the date of occurrence; d. Doors, fences, gates, and aimi lar structures shall be kept in proper operating condition, including their locking and latching devices. 2. Landscaping, trees, shrubs, groundcover, and irrigation systems: a. Landscaped areas shall be kept free Eiom weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy thrlving condition! b. All plant materials shall receive regular maintenance, including but not limi xed to, fertilizing, mowing, and trimmi nq: c. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant materials shall be replaces within 30 days from the date of damage; d. Irrigation systems shall be kept in proper working order to provide proper amounts of water and proper coverage; and e. Landscape screening materials, such as hedges, shall be Pruned to maintain their screening ability. 3• Parking areas, walkways and open space: a. Shall be kept clean and Eree of detrcis and items of store qe; b. Paved surFacee shall be mainta :nod Eree of potholes, broken pr raised sections. and other deteriocat ion; V CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. DCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 3 c. outside lighting Fixtures shall be kept in proper working order; inoperative lights shall be repaired or replaced within 30 days of damage or failure; 4. Trash enclosures and refuse containers: a. Shall be kept clean and the vicinity kept free of debris and gates/doors shall be maintained in proper working order; b. Accumulatior. of refuse shall not be permitted to exceed the capacity of the refuse containers; 5. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 houzs. 6. Recreational facili ties, common use areas, amenities, and other site improvements shall be maintained in a usable condition free from deterioration; 7. LSghting shall be maintained in a usable condition free from deterioration; e. Conditions of Approval for a project, imposed in conjunction with the Development/Design Revl ew process which set forth requirements for the development cf the site, aha 11 also be subject to ongoing maintenance requirements. SECTION 4: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely affect the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section. paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent j ur ledict ion, or by reason of any preemptive legit lotion, the remaining prowls ions. sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 9 ECTION 6: The Mayor shall al gn Yhie Ordinance and the City Cle tk shall cause the same fo 6e published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario: California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. I ~ !- 28 7 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: U November 6, 1991 T0: Mayor and Membere of the City Council ,Tack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Plainer BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE ANENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend varioue development standards and design guidelines for multi-family reai dential districts. Staff reconvnenda issuance of a Negative Declaration. CON SL DERATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF PANCNO i CUCAMOHGA - A zequeet to amend varioue development standards and design gui delinea for multi-family residential districts vithin the Taira Vista Planned Community area. Staff tecommend9 issuance of a Negative Declaration. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMEN DNENT 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMCN GA - A request to amend Various de veiopment standards and design guidelines for multi-family residontial diet rids within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. RHCOMMBNDA2I0~ The following actions are requested from the Council: A. Approval of Development Code Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Ne gatiVe Declaration. B. Approval of Terra Vista Planned Coamluni ty Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. C. Approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. CITY COUNCIL ST APF REPORT OCA 91-02, TVBCA 91-02, & VPCA 91-02 - CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 BACRGROO1m On February 26, 1991, the City Council adopted a resolution charging the Planning Commission with the responsibility to modify the City's development standards and design guidelines to improve Che quality of multi-Eami ly projects. For the past seven months, the Planning Conmiission, representatives from the dove lopmenc community, design professionals, and staff have worked together in modifying and developing new standards and policies in order to implement the Council's directions. AEt et seven workshops and Eive public hearings, the Planning Commission, on September 11, 1991, concluded the review and Tacommended to the City Council the proposed changes to the various development standards as shown in the attached three Ordinances. Fox the Counei L'9 reference, staff has attached to this report copies of the duly 10, August 14, and September 11 Planning Coamis aion Staff Reports as well as copies of the Planning Comniss ion's minutes for the seven workshops and five puhllc hearings. IdiALSSIS This section of the report summarizes the proposed changes to the various development standards and design guidelines affecting multi- family projects within the citywide area and the two planned common ities• To help the Council review the proposed amendmentsr staff has included a summary Gable (Exhibit "3") comparing the existing standards with the proposed ones and a list of changes other than development standards. Poi a mare detailed desr_ription of the proposed standards, please refer to the duly 10, August 14, and September 11, 1991, Planning Commission Staff Reports. A. boos lopment Code 1. Development Standards a. Establish a minimum net lot area of 3 acres for Basic Standards and 5 acres for Optional Standards. Comment: The Planning Corm iss ion agreed with staff that requiring a minimum lot area would encourage Lot consolidation and then shy provide a qc ea ter opportunity for efficient and quality site desirm. Xoweverr the Planning Commission recognized that there are approximately 70+ lots which are under 7 acres, and currently designated as Medium Residential, with no development proposals within the city. A provis Lon was added allowing those Lots of legal record that are under 3 acres to be developed at the lowest end of the Jena ity range. The purpose of this limitation is to ensure that the ai to design would comply with all Development Standards, Design Guide li nea, and 2e~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, 6 VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA November 5, 1991 Page 3 Policies, as with La rget parcels. For Optional Standards, the Planning Coven fission determined that establishing the 5-acre minimum lot area would be consistent with the Low and Low-Medium Residential Districts. b. Estahli sh a minimum 100-foot street frontage and a minimum 50-foot flag lot street frontage under the Basic Standards. Comment: The Planning Coven isaion brought up the issue of poor entry design and streets cape for those projects with narrow lots. The Planning Commis lion felt that requiring a minimum street frontage would ensure the multi-family projects comply with the design criteria of a visually pleasing streets cape. c. Modify and add new standards for Building Separations as shown in Exhibit 4 - Table 17. 08.040E. Comment: The distances between 6uildinge and the setbacks from property line are established to provide for an element of openness and human scale. Unfortunately, the minimum standards ten often become the design maximum in many projects. The Planning Commission saw a need to improve the standards that will be insistent with the policies in the Community Design Element of the General Plan. These new standards are intended to achieve the proper balance for hui lding eca le end mass with the distance separation between buildings. d. Add new standards requiring specific types of recreational amen itiee within open space areas for projects. These new standards are shown in Exhibit "C" of the attached Ordinance. Comment: The Commission Eel[ that there is a need to improve the existing codes by setting minimum standards for providing recreational amen itiea according to CAe size of the project. The standards have built-in Flexibility for the developer in selecting the types of recreational amenities offered to address mark etinq needs. e. Add new requirements for project amenities to include a minimum of 125 cubic feet of interior storage space and to provide laundry fact Litiea as shown in Exhibit "F" of the attached ordinance. Comment: Tne proposed standards were results of input from Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. as well as lengthy discussions by the Planning Commission regal ding the 2q o CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, 6 VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November fi, 1991 Page 4 affordability issue versus the qua Lity of life. The P tanning Commission determined that the proposed requirements would increase the quality of life and still not negatively impact the ability to build affordable units. Add new standards requiring all visitor parking to be properly signed as shown in Exhibit "D" of she attached Ordin ance• Conment: The Planning Commission determined that visitor parking spaces should be identified properly so that visitors may easily locate them and they would not be used as permanent parking spaces by the tenants. 2. Absolute Pollcies. The DevelopmenC Code has Absolute Pollcies that address the issues of neighborhood compatibility, mitigaee land use conflicts through buffering, quality site plan, circulation, and axch ltectural compatibility, etc. The Planning Commission examined the language and found it adequate. The only modification that the Planning Commiscion proposed was to change the word "can" to "ahal l" for one of the Land use mitigation measures as shown in the attached Ordinance. The purpose is to strengthen the requirements for transition of density. General Residential Design Guidelines. The Development Code has Design Guidelines which establish a high-quality standard Eor building and site design. These guidelines are Dased on the community design goals as expressed in the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed these guidelines and, in general, found them to be adequate in ensuring high-quality design. However, the Planning Commission decided to strengthen the language of several design guidelines pertaining to she multi-family development in areas of transition of density, design of multi-family buildings, open space, etc., and as shown in Exhibit ^G^ of the attached Ordinance (in hold print). Related Items NoC Part of the Development Code Amendment. During this multi-family study. the Planning Commission caised concerns with how to ensure high quality design for multi- family projects reflective of the City'9 desire, how to inform the development community of high standards of de al gn, and how to ensure quality of landscape materials. To address these issues, the Planning Commission established the following policies and requirements: 2q1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA 91-D2, TVP CA 91-02, 6 VP CA 91-02 - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMON GA November 6, 1991 Page 5 a. Require a supplemental questionnaire, where the applicant or the developer would have to articulate in writtett and graphic form how the proposed multi-family pto ject meets the Absolute Policies, the Development Standards, and the General Design Guidelines, as requited by the current Development Code• b. Strengthen the current Planning Commission's Policy by amending Resolution No. 88-tfi to to require a lic ersed landscape architect to inspect and certify the health of the Landscape materials prior to planting. c. Direct staff to prepare a chap tar of the Design Guidebook handout for multi-family development. In the interim, staff has prepared two design policy handouts - one for the Residential (single and multi-family projects) development and the other for Commercial and Industrial develapments~ d. Add new design guidelines or policies that address the issues of maintenance problems created by such items as downspouts, placement of utility housing, etc., as shown in Exhibit "5." B. Planned Communit its. During this multi-family study, the Planning Ccmmission reviewed and compared the standards among the Development Code and the two Planned Community texts. The Planning Commission found discrepancies and differences in the development standards between the two planned rnmmuni ties. The Planning Commission determined that the standards of the two Planned Conmuni ties, at a minimum, should be mnsi stem with one another. Representatives from both property owners agreed. a. Amend the Victoria Planned Communl ty text by adding language requir ing Transition of Density far multi-family pro jecta that abut lower denai ty district and add Building Separation Standards to be consistent with the Development Code. b. Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community text by adding language requiring Transition of Density for multi-family pro jecte that abut lower density district and add Bui ldrng Separation Standards to be consistent with the Deve Lopment Code. c. Amend the street setback requirements for Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Coammntties to be conaie tent with one another. 292 CITY COVNCIL STAFF RE PDRT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, & VP CA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 6 C. Etiwanda Specific Plan. In reviewing and comparing the multi-family development standards between the Deve Lopment Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the Planning Coavnission determined that the Specific Plan has adequate provisions to guide multi-family projects. Therefore, no amendments weze re cosmended. 0. Environmental Assessment. The proposed amendment consists of changing development standards and design guidelines which would not create a significant impact to the environment. Staff recommends issuance of Negative Declarations. PAG1'S POR PIIIOTgG6 The City Council must make the following findings in order to approve, all or in part, the proposed amendments: A. Development Code Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment does not conflict vlth the land use policy of the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 3. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties or have a significant impact on the en viKO nment. H. Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not have significant Impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. C. Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent will: the goals and ob7 ectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will not have ei gn iEicant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties. 2~3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF AE PORT OCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, 6 VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA November 6, 1991 Paqe ', ODRAffiPOND)®C6 The above-described proposed amendments have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Hu lletin newspaper as a public hearing. Notices were also sent to all property owners that have land designated as Medium, Medium-High, or High Residential Districts and without a development proposal. Aes ful Dm d, Erad Huller City Planner He :NF/jEa Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Coemission MSnutes of Eeptember 11, August 22, August 14, August 1, July 18, July 10, May e, April 25, Apr11 11, and April d, 1991 Exhibit "2" - Commission Staff Reports of September 11, August 14, and July 10, 1991 Exhibit "3" - Susmary Table Exhibit "4" - Table 17.08.040E Exhibit "5" - Liat of Design Policies for Multi-Family Projects Exhibit "fi" - planning Commission Resolution Nos. 91-134, 91-135, and 91-136 Proposed Ordi rtan ce for DCA 91-02 Proposed Ordinance for TVPCA 91-tl2 Proposed Ordinance for VPCA 91-02 ~q `-i EXHIBIT 1 " 4-4-91,4-11-91,4-25-91,5-8-91,7-10-91, 7-18-91, 8-1-91,8-14-91,8-22-91 & 9-11-91 COMMISSION MINUTES DCA 91-02 'IVPCA 91-02 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-0'1A P.C. 7-]0-91 8-14-e1 9d 1-91 C.C. II-e-91 Zqs E- ENVZAONMENTAL A99E59MSNS AND DEVELOPHFNT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 - C'TY OF RA_NCNO OlCAMONOA - A request to amend vsriou• development et andard• and ae•ign quiaelinae for multi-family tea idential districts. Staff recommand• ieauann of a Negative Oeclarat ion. (Cant inu ad from Auquat Z2, 1991.( L. wi NT ~ A NT TIN NDA <P IPI P a NO NT 91-02A - CZTY OF PANCNO CVCAMONGA - A raquwt to amend various development rtantlard• antl design quidellnu for multi-family residenCial districts within the SC iuantl• Specific Plan area. Staff Yeconunenda Ueuance of a Negatlw DecLntion. (COntinwd from AuquK 22, 1991. ( M- ENVZRONlRNTAL A99ESSMENT AND TERRA VI9TA PLANNED COMMVNITY A10SNOMENT S1-02 - CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A regLLOt Co amend vaYiau• dwelopment standards and doign guidelines for multi-family raaLdentLl diatrict• wit Ain tN Terra VLta Planned Community aZe1. Sta[L reeosglend• issuance of a Negative Oeclarat ion. (Continued tram August 22, 1991.( N, pNVIRONlfENTAL A39ESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANIPED COIOIDNITY AMENDMENT 91-OZ - SITy OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A request to amend various development et andarde and du Lqn guldel inn Cor multi-family uaidential diet ricu withLn the Victoria Planned Community area. ataCt recoemende iuuance of • Negative OeeUntlon. (Continued tram August 22, 1991.( Nancy Panq, Senior PLnner, preunted the stet[ report. chairman McNiel opened tN public heaYinq. Soe Ol bon, Lawn Names, 1146 North Mountain AwnW, Vpl and, raquuted that eM word "general" 6e added befor! Design Gulldel Lnee on page IV-34 at tM terra vLU CaaIDUnliy Plan; Hr stated that Tabu v-~ should haw 27 teat aveugr shown for Detached Gauge/Grport and Accessory Building Setback from Col Uetor Aoad. Ma. Panq stated that tM reference to Stange unlb in carporC etruc[uree shoo ld hr removed Liam 9sat lan 17.08.090. C.9(a). Peter Pituel, PLGeei/Dalmau ArehiGete, 9]67 Hawn Avenw, Rancho NeanAanga, thanked the City for the apportunlty to pereLeipaU. Ne requelted wording clarification on the buildln9 separaeion Mfseween patio teneu or walls more than 4 fwi in Might. Commialioner Chltlea tilt everyone had worked well togeiMr to develop workabL standards. 9M appreciated eM work of cuff and nMMm6en of she communl[y. Chairman NcNlel lalt everyone wu aware o[ tM lnbnt and M hoped the •pi nc of cooperation would continw, Plsnning Coemiselon MlnutO -~ September 11, .99: 2-1 ~o Notion: Hoved by chit isa, seconded by Melc her to adopt the reaoluticva recommending approval of Environmental Aa9e9 amens and Oevelopmenc Code Amendment 91-03, Environmental Assessment and Serra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02, and Environmental Raw semsnt and Victo as Planned Community Amentlmen< 91-02. Notion carried by the following vote: RTES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT IEA, HCNIEL, ME LCHERr VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -earrisa Motion: Moved by Me lc her, uconded by Chitin, to adopt Roolue ion AB-161A, amending the ueablished policiu rsgardlnq landeupe and irrigation drawings. Motion estr ied by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIBL, MELCHERr VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMI39IONERSS TOLSTOY -<attled Commissioner Melc het request etl that the Minutes reflect that action on Environmental Auusment and Etiwanda Spetiflc Plan Amendment 91-02A wu tab Ud. O. MOOIPICA J "7 - N - A t^quest to modi Cy a prwiously proved Traet Map to incrHN Che number of multi-family loo from 3 L eted and 17 numbered lots to 4 Ltbred and 16 numbered lot• for 396 unit on 3J.5 acre. oC Lnd in the Medlwa-High Rea idenL ial dos ignat ion )14-24 •llinq unit. per acts) of the Terra vl^ta Planned Community, located at ha norehuat corner of Spruce Avenue and Church StrNi - APN: 3077-421- Anna Liu Hernandes, AssLtan! F reported that a letter had ba app! ieat ion beeauu they felt it vied tM sGtl report. SM al ao tram • rea ident protesting the worm mu It L-Lamely unit •. Chairman MCNL1 coamented Lhat the Lt merely Co provide a grater whlcU for commi a inner Me1cMr eked i[ the modltlca[ common srsa improvements, apecl[lcally the am Dsfon the Planning Commie ion aq and pha•lnq. Ms. Hernandes ^taNd that currently th^ COt lot and reek in the du iqn nvLew prates and would have to return committu for final approval. Commissioner Melchor aoggeaNd tN development o[ the Ph ate I. Plannlnq Commie eon Minutia :~ of tees the pha•inq of anal building wer• th^ Du ign Rev uw he tied co 5epesmbsr 1:, ::i. 2 I, CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA PLANNING COMA ISSiON MINUTES Adjcurnetl Meec inq August 22, 1991 Motion: Moved by Melche r, sac onded by Valletta, carried 3-0-2 (Chit iea, McN Let absent) to appoint Toletoy ae Temporary chairman. Temporary chairman Toletoy called the Adjourned Heating of the city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm iaeion to ortler at 3:60 p. m. The meet Lnq was held in the Raine Room at Rancho Cu camonga'e Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Orive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. POLL CALk roMMZSSIONERS: PRESENT: Larry HcNiel (arrived at 3:55 p.m.), John Helmer, Peter Toletoy, Wendy Valletta ABSENT: Su zapne Chit iea STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Anna-Elsa Hernandez, Aesiet ant Planner MuLTS-FAMILY HOUSING $TANDARR$ A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 - CI^Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - A requut Co amend ver iou• development etanda rde and design quidol inee for multi-family residsntial dlatr icte. Staff recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaraeion. (Continued from June 18, 1991.) 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECI SIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02A - CITY OF RANCXO CVCAMONGA - A nqueet to amend variou^ development etandard• and design guidelines for multi-famlly residential diatriets within tho Etiwanda Specitlc Plan arcs. Staff recommends issuance of a nags[ ive Doclaratlon. (cent Lnued from June 18, 1991.) C. eNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNSTY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA - A nquut to amend various development etandard• and deeign qu idol ine• for multi-Family resident ial diet aces within the Terra Vleta Planned Community area. Sta tf rocommsnde ie nuance of a Naga[iw Declaration. (Coot inued from June 18, 1991•) D. ENYIRQNMEN_TAL A$SE~$MENT AND_VICTORSA PLANNED CONMUN ITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A raga alt to amend vaticu• dwelopment et andards end tlu iqn qu idslinu for multi-faintly ru idential tlisr recce within the Victoria Planned comma nity aru. St afE recommend• issuance c, a Nogat ive Doclaratlon. (Continued from June 18, 1991.) egg Nancy Fonq, Senior Planner, stet ed that one of the issues ChaC nettled to be reaolvetl was the propovetl 20-foot separation between balconies. she explained the reaeona for such prepo svd et andard e. Joa 0leaor., Lewis Homes, propoeed a 15-foot aeparat ion between balconies. Commiss ionec Helcher suggested that a solution would be Co allow the 15-foot aeparat ion Detween ba lconiee if the separation between pat Soo is 30 feet. If the separation between pat toe is 15 Eevt, by felt the separation between balco niav should be 20 feet. Chairman NcNisl arz teed at 3:55 p.m. Commie•icnvr To 11[oy quutioned chat her there uou Ld be auf ticivnt Brea for landec ap ing within the 30-foot eepsraC ion. staff rvaponded that typically there may be a 6-foe[ pvdutrian walkway within this 10-foot area, lenving perhaps a 3-foot ores on each vide of the patio fencev for landscaping. Commie toner Vallsttv stated that she could like to maintain Cho proposed 20-foot separation batwen balconies. The conunau• of the Commluion wu that eM 10-foot esparailon between pat io• iv not wide enough to provide lendsoapinq if pedutrlan walkway. era to 6e ineludvd. The Cammieaion decitled on the following atandetde: a minimum 30-foot separation without •itlewaLk batwun patio Gneu that are lees than 5 Ever in height, plus 5 feet betwun beltoniss; a minimum 15-foot aeparat ion with v idewalk between patio Aneei Chet are more than 5 tut in height, plus 5 feet batwevn balconies; and, it 'tM uparat ion Deiween patio fences 1• 20 feet, even the svperet ion betwun Dalconis• shall be 20 tut. Pete pit as •i, PitauL b Dalmau b AUOCia[e •, requested clarification as to the separation 6etwun a two-story and a than-story build ing end hetwan a threa- story and a Eour-story building. staft indicated the espara[Lon batwau • two-story and a thres-atary Duilding would be 40 tut at the third story and the uparat ion OKween a there-story and a tour-story Duilding would be 50 fur at the fourth story. Comm ive inner Toletoy rated eoncern• that a three-aiory building may be placed next to a onevtory building cresting • dlsproport toned sppearanca in scale ana neigh[. the Comm lesion agaed Chet des iqn criteria ^hould be developed to addaes this issue and dicectad stet[ to prepare appropriate language co be added to ens guidelines. She Comm ieslonea agresd. Planning Commie ion Minute '~. Auquat 22, 199: 2~ ~ Commies inner Mmlcher commented that requiring units to be equipped wash a washing machine and clothes dryer could affect the affordability of Chose uniY9. Commissioner Valletta stated that providing the laundry facility is an Lucre ass in quality o£ life. Some memDere of the Commies ion etat ed that affordability is a separate issue and the Commission ahoultl deal with the Development Code amendment. The ma}ority of the Commie ion agreed Lhet the launtlry facility thou ld be a choice of either providing a hook-up fcr each unit of providing common laundry facil it iae. Commiesionar Valletu dUagresd. Mr. Oleson brought up Cho iuue of the prapowtl 38-foot average setback for uncovered parking in Che Terra Vista Planned Convnunity. Me proposed a 32-toot average eetoac k. Comm ie •Loner McN iel asked staff for claritlcation. Ma. Fong respondetl teat the 38-toot utback i• [or the building, the detached structures, and uneoveretl parking in order to maintain a coM ieunc etreeueepe cone intent with the requirement in the Development Code. it was pointed oui thst the 38-foot utback ie already Lsa than tM rage irsments of the Development Code. In a minimum, the two plannetl Communities standards Are consistent with one soother. The Commiesion'• direction was td maintain the pwpogtl 38-foot average setback from a major arterial. The meeting vest adjourned at 5:15 p.m. antl Lhe Commission continued the public hearing to the September 11, 1991, regular meeting. Respect [u lly euDmitted, B" tad Bul 16a~~ Secretary alarm inq CommLSion Minute ~. August 2Z, 199: 3vo A S: COMMISS ZONERS: CNITIEA, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE AESENS: OMNIS520NER5: NONE -failed to carry Motion: Move~~ by Melcher to adopt the reeolut ions in principal for an B-1/2 foot by 18 Moot uniform parking apace suoject to the preparation of corrected exhibits to support the reeolut ions to be returned to the Commies ion for approval. Ralph Hanson, City Attorney, eugge at ed Chat if Che matter were to be returned to the Comm ie eion, that the public hearing be coot inu ed eo that a definite recommendation ccuid be made to the City council. Cammisaioner Melcher withdrew the motion. Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Valletie, to continue Environmental Asee6ement and Development Code Amendment 91-01 and Environmental Assessment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-01 to August 29, 1991, to permit the exhibits and proposed otdinancee be corrected with the understanding that the e-1/2 foot x 18 foot apace be the basin for the eorrectiana. Chairmen McNLel reopened the public heerinq. Hot ion to continue to Auquet 28, 1991, carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried ~ • r ~ ~ ~ p EwVIAONME NTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOP PNT CODE F 02 CITY OP Ft~'lCHO CUCAMONGA - A requeli to amend variou• development standards and design guitlelime for multi-family residential dLtrLCU. Staff recommends iuuance of a Negative Declaration. (COnG lowed from July 10, 1991.) {.A ENVIRONwFNT A NT ND TIWANDA PECIFIC PLAN A'^ND NT 91 02A CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONO~ - A requut to amend variou• development etandard• end design gu idelinee toz mu It t-family rosidential dietricte within the ECiwende SpecLf is Plan arse. Staff recommends Leeuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from July 10, 1993.) If. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT R{ VISTA P E COM. ITY 1 02 - CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMON A - A requut to amend yerlou• development standards and design qu ldeline• [or multi-family reeidentlal dietricte within the Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends Leeuance of a Negative Oeclarat ion. (Continued from July 10, 3991.) Planning Commission NinuG• fi• Auquet 14, 1991 30l I. ENVIRONMENTAL AS SESSMrNT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CZTY QF RANCHO CUCAN.ONGA - A request tc amend various development etanda[da and design gu idel toes for multi-family rea ideniial dietr icts within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued Erom Ju Ly 30, 1991.) Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and some replacement pages to exh ibite, inclutling graphic changes to the building separation, changes to the Terra Vista Planned Community text, and Victoria Planned Community text. Chairman HcN iel questioned [he eepar at ion between build cogs if Lhe minimum separation between Lhizd-story building walla ie 40 feet, but each third-et ory building hoe n ~-foot deep deck. He thought that would retluce the actual build inq eeparat ion to only 26 Eeet. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated Chat the minimum eeparat ion for the lower two floors of a three at ory building could remain 30 fee[. Ha ea id that the gu idelinee requite en additional 10 foot setback for 0very story over two; therefore, a three-story building requires 40 feet between building walla, a four-et ory building [squires 50 feet, etc. Chairman McNiel requested that the 30-foot dimension be shown on Exhibit E-3. He opened the public hearing. Dan Richards, Seephen Daniels Commarc iel Brokerage, Inc., 8311 Haven Avenue, f200, Rancho Cucamonga, quest coned the timing of the implumentaC ion of the proposed changes. Rr ad Ru Lle r, City Planner, stated they would become effective the day the Ordinance i¢ adopted in ire final form by [he City Council. Mr. Richards ae ked if the standards would apply to projects in proceae. Mr. Buller stated the standards wbu Ld not apply to projects which had pulled permits. He said the standards would apply to any project in pmcaes wnicn had not been approved. Mz. Richards stated Lincoln Propsrt ies he• spent in uxceaa Of $1,250,000 on their project at the northeast corner of Bass Lins end Mlllikan. He said rosy have been in the procus for almost two Eull yurs end are within a month of submitting a completely cedes ignud project which they feel mute all thu crrteria and concerns previously raised by fns City. He stet ad the City Council had given direction to resubmit the project without prejudice, waiving all the tees. Ns said rosy had acted an facto and the new etantlerd• would aabotag¢ the project. Ns aekud that their project ba permiGtad to continw to proceae under the current standards. Ha ea id the project ie not fuaeible with implementation of the new qu idelinss. He did not [sal it i• fair to npply chs new atenderde to a projsat which had already bun through Plenninq Conuni a ion and City Council and was being raaubmittsd at fns direction of City Council. He thought the standards should only apply to projects not elrsady aubmitcsd. chairman McNisl agreed that Llnco ln'e project had Dssn in procus• Eor a long Planning Commies ion Minutes '~ Augu e[ 14, 1991 3bz time and had been through the process several times, but he did not feel the City ie reeponeib le for the position the project ie currently in. He thought the lack of approval was a direct reeu It of the applicant's failure Go Listen to the comments of the neighboring resident e, staff, and the Planning Commission. Mr. Richards stated that Lincoln has ac knoWl¢dged they did not initially listen to direction. He said that Lincoln now feala they have complied with the Cit y'e wishes and they are almost r¢ady to eu bm it a new package. He felt that to atlopt the new et andards and tell developers they had to comply if they had not already pu Llsd building permits was unfair. Mr. Buller said that when the City started the standards update proceee, staff evaluated how many projects ware in proceee or had approvals and Lincoln was one of the developers in that category. He said the developers were invited to participate in the workshops so that tlsvalopers could keep in step with the potential new changes ae they were developing their plane. Comm ice is ner Valletta stated that several members of the development community attended the workshops and their project submittel• reflect their attendance and knowledge of what will Boon be transpit inq. She felt that it was L incoLn'e decision not to attend and become informed on what to expect. Jae oleeon, Lewis Homes, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, stored they have proj acre which have been approved under the old standards but for which building permits have not yet been pulled. Hs said they hod operated under the as eumpt ion that projeet• which were already approved would not be subject to the new standards. Mr. Buller stated that it a project approval comas up for an sxtene ion, it ie a discretionary action for the Plannlnq Commle•ion to approve the extension. Mr. oleeon agreed that was hie understanding. Xe expressed appreciation Eor the opportunity to participate In the workshops. Me stated Lt ie an enormous amount of detail. He [nought the specific issue of the balcony aeparat ion was not addressed at workshops. Xe requested that the separation between b alcania• be a minimum o[ 15 feet instead of the 20 feet shown on Exhibit E-2. He commented that the stsndard depth o! balconies 1• 6 - 9 fast. Ne said LE the building footprint eepnrat ion Ss 30 feet, the balconies could only De 5 teat deep to allow the operation between balconlu at 20 feet. Mr. oleeon thought the numbers on Table V-4 In the Terra Vista plan had been switched for she building setback in the collector road category. Ne though[ the setback should be 27-foot average, 22-foot minimum for lower loan ihree- etory and 32-foot average, 27-foot minimum of three story or higher. Me. Fong agreed the figures should be ewltchad. Mr, oleeon quest coned why the uncovered perking setback would bs the same as a full garage or carport. Ha nquotad reducing ens uncovered perking eetbac ke to a 32-foot average on a major arterlel, 28-Coot average on a secondary arterial, end 27-toot average on a collector road. Ne also se ld they were under the impreu loo Lhat if a project wars designed to De s rental pre jars, Planning Commieeion MinuteB ~ August 14, 1991 363 [here would be an option to provide a common laundry facility instead of individual hook-ups within the units. Commissioner Helcher et at ed that he thought she understanding at the last wockahop was that launtlry equipment hook-ups would be requited in all ^for sale" unite and there would be an opportunity to provide central laundry areas in lieu of hook-ups in rani al projects. Ne thought there was agreement that there would be an emendme ni to the Condominium Conversion ordinance to require hook-ups within individual unite upon convere ion. Mr. Ol aeon agreed that was hie understanding ae well. Gary Lu qua, William Lyon Company, '1470 Victoria Park Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, complimented the Commi9eion and et off far invo lvin9 the private aectoz in the review process. He felt a lot had been accomplished. He hoped that in the Euture the groups would work together on other projects. Ha stated hie recollection of the laundry facilit ie• ieeue coincided wish Commiae inner Melcher'a. Commies inner Helcher asked that the Commies ion Consider conttnu ing the item for two weeks because na felt the subject deserved addi[ional time to study how the standards relate to the four important document• which control devalopmeni in the City. Chairman NcNiel toncu rrsd with Commissioner Melche[ witn respect to the launtlry ieeue. Commissioner To lstoy tnought they hetl die cueaed providing a minimum 50 percent of the rental unite with individual hook-ups. Commissioner Helcher stated the 50 percent figure nod bean disouseed but it was felt it ehoultl ba possible to develop rental ptopert ias wnicn have only central laundry facilities in the name of affordable. Comm iseioner Chit ias concurred. Commissioner Valletta thought the distances for builtling eeparat ion were to be meaeuretl Erom et airways es well encloaad balconies or patios. commiaeionere Melchsr, Toletoy, and Chltisa concurred. Commiaeioner Valletta esksd if "erchitacturally integrated" could be added to the descrlpticn of the exterior, la ckebl• storage apace asction. she eta[ed she would like to see the draft chapter for the Design Guidebook rafsrenced in she Development Code because she Celt it woultl strsngthan the validity of the book and give current etiterie for design requirements. she felt that would permit the design coterie to be modifietl 6y simple minute action of the Planning Commission, making ii a mars fluid document, but with the strength of the DevelopmenC code. She thougnt the Commission had agreed not to dictate that driveway in multi-family projects would be Creetsd witn stteetecape, curvilinear lanes, and ^etreat side" landscaping, ae rsferanced in Section III.C. of the draft Des Lqn Guidebook. she esketl /t "knowledge of current City Planning Commieaion Hinutee ~ Auquat 16, 1991 3b`1 raga irement e" could be adtled to paragraph 1 of Resclut ion 88 -161A. She thought the Commiaeion had discuesetl and agreed there ie a need for multi- family unite to include an entry statement far each project. She aeketl that the language in the Dee Lgn Guidebook ba et[engt hened Erom "1e9B preferable" to "unacceptable unless justified." She thought a statement should be included under the Community Dee ign Coals sect ion in the Den iqn Guidebook that any project submleted with the intent to meet only the minimum atandarde wou ltl not be acceptable. Chairman McNiel to It that to change the language Ln the Dee iqn Guidebook to ^unaccept able^ would be too restrictive Dec ease there may be opportunit tee for the "lees preferable" options to be designed into a project and work reasonably well. commies toner Tolatoy felt that in the design review process those prohLems could De worked out. Commissioner Valletta stated she would like to see the development eonmunity come to the design review ptocenn with a firm idea rather than a book of eu ggeetione. She thought by retarwcing the Den Lgn Guidebook in the Development Code it wouttl not be a surprise when the developers arrive ai the Oeaign Review Committee. Commisnioner Tolntoy thought that small-lot projects would nand to ues Home of the "less preferable" itemn in ordeY Lo be developed. Commiaeioner Chitisa quest Toned iE commienloner Valletu would prefer changing the wording to "untleeirable." Comm ieaioner Halcher suggested changing LM language to "like this" inaL sad of "pre Eerable^ and "not like this" instead of "lens pretezable." He ditl not think an architect would need the tliagramn. He. Fong sL ated the draft chapter of the Oenign Guidebook wa• included far informational purposes only to nhow that something could be developed to be handed out to the development communtty. She said staff would De developing the Design Guitlebaok and could meet with the Commiselon to tllecuen the format and language. Mr. 9u ller etabd that In the Hll le ids Development Ordinanw Che terms ^t his" and ^not this" era uwd. Chairman McNiel agreed that would be acceptable. chairman McNiel felt thnt development becomes less imaginative the more Lhinq• era epecif icelly defined ae to the parameters. He thought flex ib pity muss be allowsd. Commie stoner Valletta felt her comments were not restrictive eo far ae data it concerns. Planning Comm iesion Minutae ~ August 16, 199: 3~s Mr. By ller auggeet ed the Commies ion may wish to continue to a workshop on Auquet 22, 1991. chairman McNLel thanked those who participated in the procee e. Hot ion: Moved by Meleher, seconded by Vallett e, to continue Env ironmen[a1 Assessment end Development Cotle Amendment 91-02, Environmental Aeeeesment antl Et iwanda Specific Plan Amendment 91-02A, Environmental Assessment and Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-D2, and Environmental Aeeeesment and victoria Planned Commun icy Amendment 91-02 to 3:70 p.m. on Auquet 22, 1991. Ho[ion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, NCN IEL, MELCHER, TOGSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried The anninq Cammteeion teceeeed from 8:40 p. m. Lo 8:50 p.m. J. N RTA EN PE T 9 - - 3 - A request io COndutt Live mue SC in conjun ion with a rastaureni and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial trio at 6620 Carneltan Street, norihwee[ corner of 19th and Carnelian Stre t\ APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from July 24, 1991.( E. CONDITZONA* USE PER~iT 78-03 - A review of compliance with cantlit icne of epprovs~, and considerst lon of suspension or revocation of the Conditionnl Vea P~init for a restaurant and bar locet ed in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th end CarnelY`an Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from July 24, 1991.). L. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL :• 3 - A requeei to extend the hour of operation and amend the cohdltion of approval prohib icing live entertainment for an existing restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carne lLan Street, northwest corner o! 19th and Carnelian Sireate - APN: 201-811-E6 through 60. (Continued from July 24, 1991.) Chairman McNiel excused hlmplE from the muitng 6acause of a poeeib le conflict of interest as he ploys on a softball team sponsored by Sam'• Place. Brad Buller, city planner, stated that the epplicant'• atto?pey had indicated they would be requesting a continuance. \ Vice Chairman Chit iea openatl the public heating. Planning Commission Minutee ~ August 14, 1991 30~ CITY OF RANCHO CNCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting Augu ei 1, 1991 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commies ion to order at 3:40 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho cucamonga'e Civic Canter, 10500 Civic center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Larry NcNiel, Suzanne Chitiea, John Melchor, Peter Toletoy, Wendy Valletta STAFF PRESENT: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Anna-Lisa Nernande x, Assistant Planner MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING STANDARDS A. NVIR NM NT AS5 S O N H 91 02 C TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend vaii0ue development Bandar da and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts. Staff recommends iseu ante of a Negative Declaration. (Coot inu ed from June 1B, 1991.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA S C PLAN ENDM N 91 02A - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A request to amend various development et andarde and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Et iwanda Specific Plan area. Staff recommends iaeuanee of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 18, 1991.) C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TERAA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHq CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential disericta within the Terra Viete Plannetl Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Coot inusd from ,Tune 18, 1991.) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSME AN V C RIA PL ED COMMUNITY AME MENT 91 OZ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A raga eat to amend vdriou5 development aiandarde antl design guidelines for multi-family residential tlietri.cta w ithir the Victoria Plannetl Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negat we Declaration. ~COOt inusd from June 18, 1991.) Oan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that th ie was the erxch workshop on the subject and the remaining topics were bu iltling eepa rations and setback raga rrement e. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, gave a brief staff report. 367 Stan Bell, Lewie Homes, ra ieetl concerns with how the building eeparat ions are measured. He felt she 20-toot separation, taken from a patio fence more than 3 feet high, ie too restrictive. woe oleeon, Lewis Homea, showed pictures of existing Terra Vista proj ecce to illustrate their concerns with the propoeetl codes. He thought an increase in building eeparat ion would not inereaee the quality of Life. commievioner Helmer agreed. Commissioner Va118tt• disagreed end comma nted that the pictures ahawn by Lewie Homea confirmed the need to increase the building separation, ae she Eelt the p is tares of existing proj seta showed overcrowding of bu ildinge. Chairman McNiel stated that one of the reason• the building saps [atione need amendment i• that applicants typically submit tl¢signs Chet are at tM minimum standards. Mr. oleeon showetl example of existing projeeu In an ettempL to Lllust race that the proposed etentlertl of 15 feei from building to curb i• too restrict ivs. Gary Luque, William Lyon Company, commented that GAL L the Low M would raise too. commissioner Talstoy stated that he had visited a number of molt l-family projects, including sane in Terra Vlste, and was concerned with the closeness and tunnel eftsct Greeted by the buildings being placed too Glow to one another. Hr. Be11 steed that the propoed standard• for both the building eeparat ion and the building-to-curb measurement could effect the dens Lty yield. H¢ thought Lhe number of unib allowed would be decreased, which h¢ felt is inconeietent with the Nevelopment Agreement for the Tatra Vista Planned community. Chairman McNiel stated that the purpoe of the propood amendment ie to achieve the quality o! late ss stated in the Coezal plan policl8. Mr. oleeon agatn showed plciun• to illustrate sntl explain why he felt the pcopoud Duildinq operation s[andard• are Loo restrictlVS. Both chairman McNiel and Commissioner Val isle felt the pictures shown depicted eUar example of the ned to Lnereee the 6uildlnq eparailon. Chairman H[NLsl nite[eGd that the majority oC the projec CS submitted to the City ors typically deiged et minimum standards and that L tM reason Eor re ising the minimum. Planning CommUeion Minute ~ Augu at 1, 1991 30~ Commies ioner Melchez stated that the increeee in building separation at the Medium-High and High density district could compound the prob Lem of not achieving Lhe allowable density. Commies ioner Vallstte et atstl [hat the highs[ density projects have bigger and taller buildings which creaia the nand for mare landscaping in order to eof[en them. Chairman HcN iel agreed and commented that typically they would have three or four etor ied builtlinge. The architectural projections, such ae enclosed stairwells and balconies, tend to close in the buildings and create a tunnel effect. Me. Fong asked the Commission whether the building separation should be increased, and if eo, by haw much. Tha majority of the Commis sicn agreed that the building sepsrat ion should ba increased. Commissioner Melcher felt that Che building separaticn standard •hould decrease for higher dsneity districts. Both Chaitman McNisl and CommLsioner Valletta dLagrsstl and commented that the higher dsneity project •hculd provide for more lend so aping. Mr. Bell sugquted that a 30-foot upscet ion be required for pat io• that ere lee than 5 feat in height and s 20-foot uparatlon be required Eor patios that are over 5 feet in height. Tha Commissioners agreed on the [allowing standards: the bui ldinq eeparat ion fot Metlium Reeidmtiel dLtr iet shall be 30 fot for building to building with no pat ioe; for patios 5 feat in halyht or laser the eeparat ion between pat ice shall be 10 Eeet; for patios 5 feet or more, the eeparat ion between pat ioe shall be 20 feet; the eeperation for pat io• (any height) on one side antl the building wall shall be 20 feet; the separation between build inge with common patio fences shall be 30 tut. Both Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Company agreed to the proposed standards. The majority of the Commie ion recommended that staff develop a •lidinq scale standard for building oparat ion under the Medium-High and High Ru idenG ial districts for a mix of two and three Koriod build Lngs. Mr. Luqus felt the proposed •eantlard• of 15 [set 6stwean building and curb ie too restrict LVe, •epaclally when the ma asuramsnt L taken from patio fenrea that ere 3 feet in height or more. Tha consensus of the Commission wss to retain the propowd 15-fool separation batwun building and curb. The Commie ion •Lo stated that the sidewalk and Planning Commie ion Minutes =~ August 1, 1991 3o~i patio may encroach within Cha 15 feet distance with the condition that a minimum 10-foot area be mnintained free and clear for lantlecapinq. L aN ..~ .:~ Lewis Homes raised the iaeve that the building to detached garage eeparat ion untler the Nigh Reaidenfial district should nos Ae inecsaeed to 20 feet ae a detached garage ie normally one-story. The coneeneue of she commiaeion was to allow the High Ree;dent ial district to have the same 15-foot separation as the Mstlium and Medium-High Ree Ldsnt ial d ietr;ct. The Commission ales stated that sidewalk and pat lce may encroach within the building 9eparat Lon distance provided that a minimum of 10 feet be maintainetl Erse antl olear for lentlscapinq. Boch Lewis Homes antl the wi111am Lyon company asked if the hu;ldlnq-to-curb eeparat ion under the High Residsniial dietcitt can be reduced from the proposed 20 feet to 15 feet. The coneenave cf Che Comm Lee ion was Co develop a el idinq-scale Btandaid where each adtlit;onal floor would require add ittonal setback for build;ng-to-curb separation. Comm iee ionet Vslle[ta caked if the Commioion had resolved the ;seue OE the cequ irements Eor laundry facilities between "for •a1a" antl "rental" type of QYOjeCC •. Me. Fong suggested that staff prepare alternatives for the Commies ion's cone iderat ion at the August 10, 199], meet ing. The Comm iee ion agreed. 40JOUANMENT Tha Commies ion edyourned the meetlnq at 6:00 p.m. Co a epecinl workshop on August 8, 1991, following the regular Oeeign review committee meat Lng. As pectfu y eubmi ed' Dan Coleman Act inq Deputy secretary Planning Commie ion Minutes ~ ~~ b Auquec 1, :99: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting July 18, 1991 Motion: Moved by Me lc he r, seconded by Vallette, to appoint Tolstoy ae Temporary Chairman. Carried 3-0-2 (Chit ie a, Mc Niel abeent). Temporary chairman To letoy called the adjourned meeting [o order at 3:A2 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL cOHMI SSIONERS: PRESENT: Larry NcN iel (arrived et a:00 p.m.) John Neither, Peter Tolatoy, Wendy Vallette ABSENT: Suzanne Chi[ien STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullerr City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Plennar; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner w . ~ . MULTI-FAMILY HOVSING STANDARDS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODB AMENDMENT 91 02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A rvqu eat to amend variau• development etandarde and see i9n guidelines for multi-family residential districts. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Oeelar at ion. (Continued from June 12, 1991.E B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENOMENT 91-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A tequsat to amend ver iou• development etandarde and design guidelines for multi-Eamlly taaidential dieiricts within the Etiwandn Specific Plan area. SteEf recommends Levuance of a Negative Oac lntet ion. (Continued from June 12, 1991.] C, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OP RANDMO ~CUCAMONOA - A request to amend ear iou• development etandarde and design 7u idelinee Eor multi-family residential dietcicte within the Terre Vists Planned Community area. StaE[ recommentle i69u ante of a Negative Dec larat to n. (Continued Erom June 12, 1991.) D. ENV PO N 5 AND VI IA PL NN N 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A Nquaet to amend vati0u• development etandarde and derlgn gu idvlLnes for multi-family residential tlietr icce within the Victoria Planned Community Brea. SCaEf recommends ie euance of a NegaC lea DaclaraCion. (Continued from Junv 12, 1991.) Nancy Fong, senior Planner, gees a Drie[ report. 311 Chairman HcNiel arrived at 4:00 p.m She Commieeion agreed with staff's suggestion Chat the ptopoeed minimum lot width standards be changed to minimum frontage ac the front property line. However, the Commission was concernetl with how it would impact parcels that do not meat this proposed standard. Brad au liar, City Planner, eu ggeetetl that language be added to the foot nose ^L" whereby parcels that do not meet the minimum street frontage could also De developed under the lowest and of the permitted density range. The Commission agreed [o the euggsetetl language. The Commission also clarified Chet the lowest entl of the permitted density range would mean the lowest number of that density range within that zoning district. Lewis Nomee commented [hat they found the criteria to require a minimum width for the open lawn area too re strict ivs. Brad sal lsr eug9uted that the language could be modified to road ^one of the tlimene ion^ shall ba blank feet" instead of "[hs minimum wLdth shall be blank feat.^ The Commieeion agreed to the change. Lewis Homa• and Lyon company agreed to Che change. Lewis Homes also Drought up the issue of water taps and quest Lonad the neatl for ChLe raga iremene. They felt that Chia requirement could atld plumbing costa to the project. They also thought the lenquage "largo open lawn area" conflicts with the requiroment• of the %eriecape Ordinance. Oan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that the lenquage dose not conflict with the Xeciecepe Ordinance. He aeid lawn areas are allowed and the "large open lawn ena^ wow ltl De ohs place where one should uu turf end drought tolerant ground coven should be used for other areas in lieu of turf. The conaenaue oP the Commieeion was to leave the word "lawn" ae proposed entl eo eliminate "water tsp" from the raqulremsnts Eor the barhecuo facilLty. Commissioner Melchor quest toned [he meaning of "private eeseeement district" as contained in Item No. a of the Recreational Aree/Facility. Mr. Buller et ated that the raga itoment iB currently in the Codo. He thought the purpose of she language was perhaps to enouza that the developer undareiand• the maintenance of any common area i^ to be by private means or by the property owner. Xe indicated staff would check with the City Attorney regarding this. The Commission reviewatl the revised language for ens "Lockable Storage Space" and found it ecceptabU with one modlf icat ion Chat the word ^LOekable^ be eliminated and the word "fully" 6e added Ln tront o[ ^enoloud garages . Planning Commieeion Mlnutee =3- July 1B, 1991 312 commissioner Vnllet to euggeeted that ~waehing machine/clothes dryer" be weed instead of ^waeher/dryer". The Commission also euggeeeea that language be included to ensure that the laundry epees is big enough to ac commotlats moat standard models. Mr. Buller euggeeted staff add language to require adequate space Eor laundry facilit tea in each dwelling unit; however, he felt ii would be beet to avoid specifying the square footage. Commies inner Valletta sakes whether the City should require 50 percent of Lhe unite in a rental product be equipped with a waeher/dryer and the remaining 50 percent be provided with a common laundry facility at a rate of 1 waeher/dryer per 5 units. Lewis Nomes thought a better way to deal with thin issue would be to revise the Coneo Convene ion Ordinance so that multi-family housing with common laundry facilit tee cannot b. converted to coneoa. Mr. Bu Ller euggeeted that the Commission continue [hs meeting tc another spacial workshop becauw the Dee ign Review Committe9 meeting was ecnadulee to begin ehartly and but leing eeparatione had not yet been discussed. The Commission agreed and continued the meeting to August 1, 1991, at 3:30 p.m. . x . . $DJOURNMENT At 5:00 p.m. the Planning Commies ion ndjourned to a workshop following the Design Review Committee meeting. Chairman McNiel called the adjourned meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga PLenning Commies ion to order et 7:30 p.m. The meeting was he le in the Paine Room at the Reneho Cucamonga Civic canter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, californle. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Larry NCNie 1, John Melchor, Peter To Lstoy, Nantly Valletta ABSENT:SUrenna Chit tea STAFF PRESENT: Brad eullu, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Princ ipaL Planner; Nancy Fonq, Senior Planner; Betty Miller, Anociab Eng inset Planning Comm lesion Minutes +~ July 18, 199: 313 M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ^EVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91 02 CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA - A requ eat to amend var ioue development et andarde antl den ign guidelines for multi-Eamily residential diet[ icte. St aEf recommends issuance of a Negae ive Declaration. (Continued From June 12, 1991.) N. £NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANpA SPECIFIC P AN A NDMENT 91 02A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development etandarde and des ign guitlel inea for multi-family ree idential tlietcicte within the Et iwantla Specific Plan area. Staff recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaration. (Cant inued from June 12, 1991.) O. £NVIRONHENTnr ASSESS PNT D T R VISTA PLANNED CO VN ITY ND NT 91 02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request [o amentl var ioue development at andarde and doe ign guidel inea for multi-family residential dietricte within Ghe Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff rscommande tseuance of a Negative Declaration. (Coot inuetl from Suns 12, 1991.) P. £NVIRON FNT ~ A NT AND VICTORIA P ANN D CZ^Y OF NCHO MON A - A request tc amend var tou• dsyelopmant etandard• and design guidelines for multi-family ree idential dlstelet• within the Victoria Planned Community area. Stnff recommends ieeuancs of a Negative Oeclarat ion. (COOL inued from Juna 12, 1991.) Nancy Fonq, Senior Planner, pre sent etl Ghe staff report. Commies inner Helchar aekad if the lot width requ irsment ehou ld bs coneidaratl in the same way es the proposed minimum lot size of 3 acres for development at the low end of the tleneity range and 5 acres fot permitting development under Optional Seanderd• at the higher and of the denelty range. Ha euggaeied that if the ptopoeed required lot width could not than be mat, tlave lopmeni could loan take place at the law antl of the denelty ranga. Me. Fonq suggested atloption of the proposed lot widths, as a developer with a substandard lot can apply for a variance to develop the property. Brad Buller, City Planner, etatad an exiettng parcel has the right to build antl if a project •iU wants to develop antler the Mw •[andarde but is unable to meet the new etandard• for lot width or size, the developer may have to apply for a variance fot she project. commiesionsr Malcher etatad that with raepact to lot area, the conditions have been laid out indicat log development can occur at the low and of the density range. Ha naked if each a provision should not be mods for lot width e• well to limit the development to the low end cE the range. Mc. Buller indicated the Commies ion could make a statement of direction or intent. He euggeeted a statement could be added that development would 6e allowed only at the lower and of a range if a parcel i• euDetandard in any way. Planning Commission Minutes =F July 10, 1991 3~~ Chairman McNiel complimented Me. Fang on a good job on an arduous project. He opened she public hearing. Pete Pitaeei, Pit aeai Oalmau Arch itecte, 92fi] Haven Avenue, Aanc ho Cucamonga, suggested that lots not meeting the minimum size requirement should not have to comply with the dimeneiona. Ne thanked the Planning Commission for permitting the owners to be present at the workshops and for cone idering their comment a. He requested that building height be defined ae the height of the building at the plate line where the aeparat ion ie taking place, not the hiq heat point of the roof Line. Ne Eelt the distance between bu iLd toga would De excessive if the top of the roof ware included when measuring from patio walls. Mr. Pitassi atat ed that the requirement• call for another cat of recreational amen it iee for each 100 units above <he flret hundred unit a. Ha asked if that mennt that 105 unite would require two eats of amen it iee, Chairman McNiel re spontled that the secontl set would not be required until the number of unite reaches 200. Commissioner Melchor felt the wording should be clarif iod to indicate that intent. Mr. Pitassi quest ionod tho need for a lockable storage space if the storage apace is located within an enclosed garage. chairman NcNisl replied tact lockable storage could bo located outeLtlo of a garage. Commissioner Melchor fall chat if the storage area 1• located within a secured garage provitlstl fot an ind LVidual unit, it may not be necessary to have the storage aces lockable. Chairman McNiel stated tae intent was to provide lockable etoraga for securing a barbecue kettle, lawn chairs, etc. Hs taought etoraga within a lockable garage arse would not nwd to be separately locked. Ne suggested the wording be expanded. Commie •ionar Melchor asked Lf it was the intent to require that the etoraga area bo located at floor level. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, replied that wee not intended ae a requirement. commissioner Me lc her eeketl if etoraga located above the Good of a car would then meat tae provision. Mr. Co lemon responded aftirmat lvely. chairman McNiel Ealt that may not accomplish whet the Commission wished to provide. commissioner Tolatoy egrud it would be difficult to ators a 6arbocus in an over-t hs-hood storage aru. Planning Commies LOn Minutes ~ Suly 10, 1991 31S Mr. Pit aaei requested the add tt ion of °reaeonably" in the Acknowletlgment form eignsd by the applicant regarding familiarity with all the pertinent Codes, Lawo, Ordinance e, Policies, etc. He flaked that skewing of bu ild inge be permieeibLe rather than mandatory, ae shown in Section III Site and Landscape Oes iqn. Chairman HcNiel thanked Hr. Pitasei Eor hie participation. Joe Oleeon~ Lewis Homes, 1156 North Hount sin Avenue, Opland, thanked the Commission and staff for allowing input. Ne requested flexibility in the requirement to provide additional recreational facilit iea Eor larger projacta. He asked [Dot the developer have the option of providing one large reereei ion Duilding or pool equivalent to two or more smaller ouch fee ilii ice. Ha asked that the building eepara[ion requirement be retlueetl and submitted a propoeel Eor various 9eibacke. He felt Chat increae ing the set beck from the curb of a driveway or a parking apace and a building or between garages and the driveways would take away from the usable open apace provided in the interior of the project. He proposed an additional category in the Duilding separation antl setback etandatds to require the distenea from an enc loved patio/balcony to an enclosed patio/balcony oz garage/carport to be 10 feet in Che Medium or Medium-High doe ignat ion ar 15 feat in the High designation. He felt it ie a benefit Lo maximize the exterior recreational areas available to Lhe inhabitants including the private areas of a bel cony or patio. Commies ionat Malcher thanked Lewi• Homes far their contribution in providing the graphics. Gary Luque, Hill rem Lyon Company, 7270 Victorin perk Lane, Aaneho Cucamonga, appreciated the team approach between the development community and staff. He felt that the major ity of the ieeuee Dad been worked out. Ha agreed Chat the warding ahoultl be revised to allow far ekewin9 of build inge instead of raga irinq it. He felt the site would dictate Che moeC appropriate layout and the Dee ign Review procea• would permit the ekewin9 of buildings to De required. Me said that in canversatlon• with staff it was indicated that if patio walla ate 3 feet or lower the Duilding eaparat ion would be measured from the building instead of from tM patio. He requnud that patio wa lie be permitted up to 5 feet Diqh to allow pi lusty without triggering the measurement from the poi SO wall. Ms. Pang showed graphite of the building separation as contained in the current code, as exists in current practice, a• propowd by staff, and ae proposed by uwis Homes. She said the currant catle requires 30 feat, but in practice moeC builtlinq• have patios which encroach into the Duilding eaparat ion with an actual eeperation of only 30 Co 15 feet Cor Lendeeap ing and walkway, making tM bu lid ing• appear much closer Chan the 30 Eeet. She ea id the proposal from Lewis Homes calling for a minimum 30-foot eaparat ion from an enclo estl patio/balcony to enclosed patio/balcony or garage/carport i• the tame as the existing coda in the Terra Vista Planned Community. Hearing no further testimony, Chairmen HcNiel cloned the public hearing. Planning Commieeion Hinute9 ~: July 10, 1991 311 Commie stoner Maleher felt the Commission nod receivetl valuable Input at this evening's meeting. He thought the matter to be an enormous issue whicn will affect the re et of the multi-family development within the City and suggested the matter be continued to allow further diecuaeione. Comm isaioner Toletoy felt the i9euee regarding recreational foe ilic ies, building height, and builtl ing sepazat ion are extremely important. He preferred additional diecuaeione in a workshop setting. Commies inner Valletta agreed. Otto Erout il, Deputy Ciiy Planner, su gqe eted the item be continued to August 14, 1991, with a workshop to be scheduled prior to that time. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Toletoy, to continua Environmental Assessment and Oeve Lopment Code Amendment 91-02, Environmental Aeaee ame nt and E[iwanda Specif is Plnn Amendment 91-02A, Environmental Aeae cement and Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02, and Environmental A9eeeement and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02 to Auquet 14, 1991. Notion cazrietl by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMHIaaIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISS S0NER5: CNITIEA -carried ~r-CIA~iAONItEN___~~i~_ -~llfO-DEVELOPMENT CODE A:xn~~ Si 4~--L'ITY-($Y ~1CH0 CUCAMONOA - A tegllest to add Section 17.08.040-P and Section 0 H.070-E to the Osvalopment Code set abliehinq property maintenance elan tle and ongoing maintenance raga iremente for multiple family dwelling Richard Alcorn, Code orcement Supervisor, presented the staff report. Commiaeioner Valletta asked wT:nt~ recourse the City would have if maintenance etandnrds art not met. .. Mr. Alcorn r~plled that es the standards ain~written it would bs a misdemeanor infcaetion of the lnw. Ha said that would permit the City to prosecute for a v iola[ion. Ns said for a major problem, the City~cou ld use the abatement proceedings. Ha indlcaietl that typically the City work~to obtain voluntary compliance. Chairman McNiel felt the adoption of maintenance standards would be an opportunity to put the property owners on notice. PLenning Camm iesion Minutes =~ July 10, :991 3~7 CI'-Y OF RANCHO CtlCA,MONGA PLANNING CC MM I55 i0N NIeUTES 0.d7ourned Meetinq May B, 1991 Chairman Mc Niel called the Ad}ourned Meeting of the City cE Rancho Cucamonga Pl annrnq Comnlssion to order at 8:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho [ucamonga Civic Cen <er, 10500 Civic Cenc er Du ve, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal rf orn ia• Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of aLleg fiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Susanne Chitiea, Larry McNie1, Johr. Melchor, Peter Toletoy, Wendy Valletta ABSENT: None STAYF YPESENT: Brad BuL1eY, City Ylannec~ Naney Yong, SeniOC PLnnnet • • • ~ MVLT I-FAM ILY STANDARDS STUOY - CITY OP PANCNO CUCANONGA - The rev ier and 3 fist u9 slon of var sous development standards and design quidelinee Lor multi- family projects. Brad Buller, City Planner, recommended that the ComnUaion review the items thaC st111 Rave an unc leer direction v muked in the staff report. Commissioner Melchor asked if there la a difiernnce in the quality of development between the city-ride area and the two planned comm~inities. He also stated that if re have Men applying the same standards from the Developsent Code to the two planned communities, then the quality of desrgn should M the sane. Joe Dlaen, Lewis Homes, atebd that at the tiw of the Co®unity Plan dove lopment, a QaaL ru struck w1tA the nagoClaUOn of the Central Park in exchange for some LUxibll sty of the atrsat •etMCb. Mr. Buller seated that the two planned comwnitiu have a whale network of open spew. The Comniu ion rslsad concerns rich the hui ldinq setbacks being toe close co the street. On top of that, tM buildings have stairwells and patios encroached into the setback areas which made it roc u. Mr. Bu liar suggested that an altermtiva co lncresslnq the street eethack for the cro planned co®uni<les is to bring tM setback in consistency vuh ane another. Repreaentativee from Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed to case a lternacive. 3~~ Commissioner Valle tte stated t'na' a des_gn ~.:. ie hook s'rou_i be made a^a_Lab Le to the development community to ass st them _: desi gn:ng pro ~~ecis• flr. 9uller stated that staff will oreoa re a draft chanter of the design aua de book far multi-Ppmily projects as an interim so Lut no n. He also stated e.`.at iF.e graphics in the gui 3e book will be sample and rough. ^he Comms s:on rev>ewed the len guage for the new standard requiring so 1:d walls between garage units. The majority of the Commission agreed wyth the langua ge• Pete Pitassi, Pitaeei/Dalmau Arehitecta, stated the[ this new stands r3 would require addition ventilation foc the garage buildings and increased 6uil ding size as each separation wa 11 would add 5 inches. Commissioner To lstoy raised concerns that viaitoz parking areas are hard to find in multi-family projects as they are not properly signed. The consensus of the Commie ion wag to add new standards requiring directory signs and individual signs to identify vi actor parking erase. Mr. Bul ier clarified Eor the Commission that the new atandazdn Eor Laundry facilities require Interior washer/dryer faei11t1es for each unit or comon laundry fact lities at a rate of one washer/dryer for each five units. ADJOUANMBNT 10:30 p. m. - Planning Commiaaion adjourned to a workshop on May 16, 1991, following Design Review at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center re gardinq the Foobhill Market Place• Respectful ly submitted, B~ Buller Se<retazy Planning Commi sa ion Minutes =~ May B 1997 3i~ CIPY OF RA.NCRO CUCAMONOA PLANNING COMM ZSS IDN MZNUTEE A djouzn ed Meeu ng Ap n1 25, 1997 Vice Cha omen Chit See called the meeting to order at 3:45 p.m. Tne meet:ng vas held in the Rai oa Room at Ra neho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Ceca monga, CA 91730. ROLL CALL COMMIBSIONEAS: PREB ENT: Suzanne Chitlea, John Nalche r, Larry McNi el, Peter Tolstuy BTAEF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Plennarl Nancy Ponq, Senloz Planner • ~ II. MVLTI-PAM ILY 9fANDAAD9 STUDY - CITY Op RANCHO CUCJIMONUA - The revier and discussion of variow dove lopmant standards and desi qn guidel inea for multi-family projects. Nancy Pon g, Senior PlannaL, prefented the •tatL report. The Commission hnd several questions on GAa currant setback standards for multi-family projects vhan adjacent to single family rasidencu. Nancy Fong clarified how eha currant stendezda era applied to those projects. The Commission than decided that the current standards an adequste. The Co®LSion [urthar discussed the edaquacy of the currant standard requiring Z-story buildings to b• utback I00 Caat Lzom the single family raaidsncas. Nancy Ponq clarified Ghat the utbeck is musund from Us property Lina and/or the dava lopmant district line end not from the single family house. Brad Buller, City planner, arrived at t71• meeting. IA •uggsstad that the Co®iasion ravler Chou Seams rh:ch eppur Co haw clot dSrectlon and agreement [tom the Commlu fon first. Than, rMn tlms pereiL, the Comission could [urtMr discuss thou 1Gu for rhlch more dtscusston and dSrectlon 1• nasdsd. Chairmen McN1e1 arrived et 1;30 p. m. 32~ Cn t:^.e !opic of m: ~ymaa .vt area, =Drover ~r.er 'o ;s :oY as'¢ed '^nw aany Lots En t..*.e City wou13 be impacted ty the new scan lard. 3rad 3u11er stated that scoff cools do some add:!innal work to Sand ou! !be total number of lots that would be substandard. :he Comma sion clarified that Locks hle siora ce space is to be Located on the exte r_oc of the unit with direct access from the outside and the design .s to be arch it ect oral ly integrated. Also, lockable storage space should only be within the enc LOSed garage and not carport. ^he Commission then moved on [o those items that have clear di recticn but need additional work. with regards to the current stnnde rd requiring 2-story builds nqe to be 100 feet away Erom the single fnmlly residences, Brad Buller suggested that the Commission ta61e this topic. The Commiaa ion agreed. The Commission had further discussion regar ding requirements of recrention amenities. Pete Pitaaei, Pete Pitaaai 6 Associates, suggested rhos ateEf look into the park credit Ordinance for eddltional reeoureea. With regards to amending the two Planned Communities Sncreaa Snq the street setbecka as close to the Bevelapmsni Code es possible, the Commiseicn suggested ehet Loris Homes and William Lyon Company submit new standards for staff review. Lewi9 Homes and William Lyon Company agreed. As for the item Concerning building separations and asiback from property linen, staff will prepare adds Lionel graphlts for the Commission to review. Brad Huller recommended thet the meeting be edjournad to she Mey 8, 1991 regular Commission msatin9. • • ~ • . AOJCUANt~HT 6:00 p.m. - Planning Commiu ion ad)ournsd. /R(e/s~/~p~ectful ly aubmltted, Rrad Buller Secretary Planning Comma anion Mlnutn =~ April 25, 199 32.E C:TY OF RANCHO CI;CA.NCNGA PLA.VV ,VG CCMNISSION ~:V C':ES Ad burned Nee ring Apr:1 11, 1991 '/rce Chair^.an C!titiea called the Adjourned Meeting of the Cr^_y of Rancho P.ICa moo ga Planning Commission to order at 3:40 p.m. Te meeting was held :n the Council Chamber a[ Fencho Cucamonga Civic Canter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Fancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, JoF.n Hel Cher, Peter To ietoy, Nendy Val lette ABSENT: Hone STAFF PRESENT: Brad BulLe r, C1 ty PLe nrterl Nnncy Fon q, Senior Planner • • . MOLT I-FAMILY STANDARDS ETDOY - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The review and di acussion o[ verloua development standerda and design 9uidnlinea for multi- family projects. Bzad Buller, City Planner, stated that the purpose o[ this meeting wee to pick up where we had left off from the last workshop on April 4, 1991. Jae Ole stn, Lewis Homes, submi tied to Mz. Bullet at the meeting a yr itten response to the April 4, 1991 Staff Reports =hairman ncNiel arrived ae 3:50 p. m. I. TRANSITION OF DENSITY AND BUFFERING A. OeveloPmant Cods Then was no eonwnsaa [rom the Commlaa San regarding Gha adequacy of the current setWck standards foz multi-Campy projects when adjacent to si ogle family zesidante. Repreaentativs• of Leari• Hamas and the William Lyan Co. indicated that they found the current atandar ds adequate. There wee a concenaus from the Commise ion to dsvalop new standards requiring two-s eory buildings to setback [uzthsr than Lha current atendards oC 100 feet. Both Levels Homes and the William Lyon Co• stated that the current standards are adequate. 322 Con9ens us from the Commission '~ rec vira '.e ae LOCe rS to ar::cu :.a^_e :n '... ..na haw they have desim:ed their oro7e r_s to neat ]:~.e Ccty's co L.aes, gu: de l.nes, ana standards. so th Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. aqr eed• Co mm ss:.cr.ea NcYiel, To lot oy, and Valletta stated that they agreed with the existing de s: qn po Lcy as outlined in the staff report with one me di Eicat :n n, i.e., to cSan ge "can" to "shall " Lewis Nomes and the William Lyon Co. stated that the current la nqua qe is Erne. B. Planned Commnnity There was no consensus .`rom the Commission whether to amend the two Planned Cammun iti ee to add design guidelines and po li saes to De cons intent with eF.e Development Code• C. Etiwanda Epe clfic Plan Concenaue Erom the Coawlaeion that current design polic iea are adequate. No changes will 6e needed. 22• OPEN SPACE A. Development Code Con census from the Commission Chet the percentage of open apace is adequate. Concensua from Che Coawleaion to dayelop now standards requiring a minimum amount of recreational amanitiea. Commissioner Me lcher di aagreed stating that the recreational amenities are market driven. Lewis Nomea and the walla am Lyon co. agreed that rscrestionel amenities are market driven and that the current codes are adequats• B. Planned Community conceneus [roe the Cosniss ion that the practice of applying Che Development Code standards of open apace to the two Planned Co®unitlea ie adequate. ILI• SITE DE91GN A. St re etacapa conceneus from the Comma n ion that the currant stands rda ere adequate. Planning Commission Minu Ces "j. April ~1, 199 323 Co rcens us from the COmmi ssion Char ~;;^e se `tack s!anda rds `.or the tvo 'r:a r.ned Commune its should 6e incraese3 to 5e as -Lose to the Ceve:coment ~cde as possi5le. 9. 3uiLdi.^.g Orientaticn Con ce.^. s'~s `rom ^_.`.e Commission that the proposed !angua qe as outlined to Live Staff ?.e oo rt s accaptab le as a broad general statement. Lewis Domes and the William Lyon G, agreed. ~. Ruil3ing Separation and Setback Erom Property Line Concens us from the Commission Co develop new atandarde and add to them into t5e two Planned Communicies. Lewis Homes dnd [he William Lyon Co. agreed. D. DYi veway/Circulation The Commi sa ion disagreed with ataff'a recommendations. Commissioner Vellette stated that the project should have an entry statement. Lewin Nomea and the William Lyon Co. agreed with the Commies ion. E. Minimum Lot Atea COIICenHU9 £r0m Llle COYmlla910n i0 develop new standards. Commissioner To lstcy atated ehet smeller lots should develop at the lower end of the density range. IV. ARCNITECTUR6 Concenaua Erom the Commi aeion to add languega a• suggested in the Staff Report to the Development Code ae general deei gn guide linen. Foc items 8, C, D, sad E, Mr. sulLar auggeated that the Commlaaion cone ids red them in the future. The Coaml uien egraed. V. LAND9C11pINC The Coamu aeion was concerned with the quality p[ material and the maintenance. commissioner To lseoy suggested Chat we establish atandsrds far the tree spread, i.e., the height to the size of the treas. Planning Commission Minutes =~ April tl, vaav 3z4 :Nr. Seller suggested that scat: oou 13 :eck :n to sir en9ehentng the sza:ccg policy to require the Landscape Arch erect to .-ape r_ the ma terral ar.d cer ::.°y them pc or to releasing the oro;ect. The Commission agr eed• The Commission further agreed with sta Ef'S recommendations in 3eveloping nev s'a ndards Eor landscaped areas such as building to parking, building to dr rveway, etc. VI. PARKING :'here was no concensus Erom the Commission whether the current parking s ea ndards For multi-family projects are adequate. Mr• Buller suggested that this subject be pushed Lor further study and discussion. The Commission agreed. VIZ. PR0.2ECf AMENITIES There was not eonseneue from the Commission se to davQopinq nev standards requiring RV parking Spaces in mu iii-family projects. Lewis Homes and the Nilli am Lyon Cc. sieted that they disagreed with this proposed requirement. Concensu9 Erom Ghe Commission to develop nev standards for providing lockable storage space. Lewis Homes and the Nilliam Lyon Co. agzeed. Conceneue from the Commies Lon Lo develop nev standards for requiring washer/dryer and recycling facilities. • • . . . APTOURNMENT 6:00 p.m. - Planning Cosmtl eeion adjourned to a vorkehop on Nay 25, 1991. //R/e~s/~p~/~e ctfu1ly eubmi tied, B" red But Ler Secretary Planning Comae anion Minutes ?~ April 11, "o' ,J 2 II. ONA_ v IT RB- 1 - wES TERN PROPER^'ES - Raviw of an in:arim do ign so lutinn vin Lieu of cha conscru ttion of Ma7ot 0 and wilding N wiehin Phau III. Risk Hager, rapNaapCi Ml Lewi• Nomu, gave a br iat every iew the Town Cantor pro7vct. Mr. Hager indicated thae the potential tansnt r Major 0 (Child's warld~ had Carminaead chair expw eion plena and Gew is N • ua• working witR a now tenanC for she build Lnq. He reported the now t ant raga use a slightly different bu ild in9, which nacueicau• a change tM pLan•. Ae a rnult, Lw i• Homn wished to purees the umporary Datri de to allow Montgomery wards ca open prior to the toner rust ion o[ Ne}or 6 Ou Lldinq N. Ne proposed that the pedotrian adcau across tM Cron[ e[ • bu ild Lnq pad would be installed prior to wards' opening and will be main ined during toner ruoeion o[ Na}or a and Building N. The Commi^•lOner• discuaeed the i~ue and taCOaaeanded approval sub}set to <Ra following Conditions: / 1. The barrlude Quid br Lnetalled pr for to tM occupancy of Mont gomeey w •. 1. The barn ado eDOUld N amlrrtalned Za bouts a day. 3. The quphlc^ and letbrlnq aced on the Darriwde should De •latent with eM exist inq graphics and lettering of Town Center. It tM conatructlon of Me3or ! and Buildup N does not eoemence within 1B0 days o[ CM lnetallaC Lan of the berricade, CM barricade would be cearoved and the one should N planted and irrigated. 5. Any modiflcationa to Na}or ! and/or Bu11d1nq N shoe ld b1 rev Lewd and approved Dy cM Do lqn Pevlaw Calm ittN. III. wrn'TI-YA_w2LY aT1Le7B-ens 'TCnIY - CL'YY dP B7WCN0 CL'C.L~!^NGk - TM iev law and discuuion of vaslove dsvelopwnt aGndards and dNign quidelinn [or malt[-tamlly pro3eet •. ' Brad BW ley, Clty Planner, stated chat iM [ormae o[ thin workshop was to qo over tM Copies of di/suplon, one by one, a ouClined in CM stall sport. Thera was caNSnwe trw tM Coamlu ion to require tM developer to explain in writing how they designed the project to meet tM cley'• pollc lee, qu Sdal inea, and standacda. commia•ioner Ne1cMc preferred not to eN cookie-cutter type standards Commie ioner ToLtoy acted the city needy to sat minimum Kandarde. Sean Bell, Lswl^ Homes, stated he wau ld like to know the minimum st andsrds. Plans in9 Commie ion Minutes 'yl- ~Pr it 4, ;i9: 3z~ Gary Wque, Filliam Lyan Company, rtavtl en at current coda [or open •pao• and recreational amen itiu are adequau. Jary cockreft, Lew i. Homes, ac atad that ch. type of ameni<iu would affect CM coat of the Xomwvnet AUCe iae son (XOA) lH e. Stan Be 11, Lw is Xames, said <hac if <he XOA Cees are Coo high, the r. will not be any buyers. comml a loner ToLtoy dLagrud with LewL Romee with regard to the rwrutional amenities being marlut-dr Lven. commioiener Val U<U waged that the community deelne quality projwe• and prow Ldinq amenltiu beyond what the market LndluNe Le important. Xr. Buller waled that CM direction from the City Connell wu to now wee new etandarda In place before the next multi-[amLly project. the eooaenaua c! the Camiuion wa that they need mere time to reeler the eta!! report and provide eh. dlreeelon. Another wrbhmp wu echedu led Cor April I3, 5991, at 3e30 p.m. in the Ralne Room at the Ranrho Ncuonga Civic Grab[, 10500 Clvlc Grater Orive, Rancho Cu camonga, G1l torn La. The meeting was adjourned at lOn]0 p.m. /R(`e~e/~pjJ]ecifully wbmitted, e~ rod eu ll~r secreeary 3Z7 Planning Comsiu ion Minuu• $ April 0. :+91 EXHIBIT 2 " July 10 . August 14 & Sept. 11, 1991 Staff Reports DCA 91-02 7VPCA 91-02 VF`CA 91-02 ESPA 91-02A P.C. 7-1691 e-14-91 9-11-91 GC. 11-691 3z8 CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~[OtiGA STAFF REPORT ~''~ DATE: September 11, 1991 ~rti T0: Chairman and Membezs of the Planning Conmission l~J/ FROM: Brdd Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMCN GA - A request to amend various development standards and deai 9n guidelines for multi-£ami ly resi dentlal districts. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from Auquet 22, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02A - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA - A request to amend various development eta ndarda and design guidelines for multi-family resi de ntlal districts within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from August 22, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEAAA VISTA PLANNED COt4AUN ITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF PANCNO COCAMONCA - A request to amend various develppment standards and design guidelines for multi-family reaident141 districts xithin the Terra Vista Planned Community area. SiaEf recosmends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from August 22, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-OZ - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts xithin the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends iesuanee of a Negative Declaration. (Continued Eram AugUat 22, 1991.1 BACKGROUND: At the continued hearing of August 16, 1991, the Comm isaion a dlourned the meeting to a special workshop on August 22, 1991. The purpose xae to refine the language of the proposed Development Standards. At the August 22, 1991, meeting the Coamission continued the public hearing to this regular meeting. For reference, copies of the August id and July 10, 1991 staEE reports and the minutes of all the public hearings and workshops have been attached to this report. ANALYSIS: The following summarizes the final changes to those proposed Development Standards as discussed ac the August 22, 1991, workshop. These changes are reflected in the attached Ordinance. pLANN ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VP CA 91-02, ES PA 91-02 - CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA September 11, 1991 Page 2 Building Separation. Representatives f[om Lewis Homes raised concerns with the proposed 27-E oot separation between balconies. Lew iS Homes suggested a 15- toot separat ion• After much discussion on the need and the merits of separation between buildings, patios, and balconies, the Commission decided on the Following stand~rde: 1. A minimum of a 10-foot landscape separation, without sidewalk, between patio fences that are less than 5 feet in height. Between ba lconi¢s, 5 feet shall be added. 2. A minimum of a 15-foot separation, with sidewalk, between patio fences that are less than 5 feet in height. Between balconies, 5 Eee[ shall be added. 3. A minimum of a 20-Foot separation between patio Fences chat are more than 5 feet in height and between balconies. B. Laundry Facility. The Commission discussed the issue of whether a certain pets cots ge of the number of units in a mu lti -family project should be equipped with a washing machine and clothes dryer in the dwelling. The Commission deliberated on the concerns of affordability and qualify of life. The Commission, with a 3-1-1 vote (Va Llette - nce, Chitiea - absent), recommended the following longue ge for Laundry Facilities: "Laundry Facility. Each unit shall be provided with a hook-up Eot washing mach me and clothes dryer in the i nteriot of the dwelling; or, common laundry facilities shall be provided and be equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate of one waehlnq machine and cloth ea dryer per Five units. Common laundry facilities should De conveniently located for all rest dente with In the comp le z. Common laundry fact lit See can be within freestanding buildings, attached to dwelllnq unite, or within the recreation building. TT1e deli gn of the common laundry fact li flee shall be architecturally compatible to the dwellings." Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment. Lew 1s Homes raised concerns with the proposed 38-foot avers qe setback Eor uncovered parkin q. They proposed a 32-foot average setback instead. At the workshop, staff clarified that the intent of the 38-foot average setback for buildings, detached gars ge9 nr carport9, and uncovered parking would maintain a landscaped siren: frontage consistent with the standards of the Development Code ant the Terra Vista Community Plan. The Comm ie sion decided that L4C 38-foot average setback should be motors Lned. 33b PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VP CA 91-a2, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMgYGA September 11, 1991 Page 3 D. Addition of design criteria to the Residential Design Guidelines. At the workshop, the Conission was concerned with the placement of buildings of three or more stories next to one-story buildings. The Commission directed staff to develop criteria to address this matter. Staff recommends that the following criteria be added to the Residential Deai gn Guidelines: "The scale and height of bui ldinga should relate to one another. eor example, a three-story building shoo ld not be placed next to a one-story building." FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to aoprove, all or in part, the propoe ed amendments: A. Development Code Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment does not conflict with The lend use policy of the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 3. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adj acept properties or have a significant impact on the environment. B. Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment is mns iatent with the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. C. Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment Ls consistent with the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomaends that the Planning Commiasi on conduct a pu 61St hearing to review the proposed amendments and to consider public input. Tne following actions are requested from the Planning Commission: A. Recommend approval of Development Code Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Ne gatrve Declaration to the City Council. 33~ PLANNING COtR1IS SION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA Septa tuber 11, 1991 Page 4 B. Recommend approval of Victoria Planned Comnuni ty Amendment 91-02 and is auance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. C. Reconm;end approval of Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. D. Table the Etivandn Specific Plan Amendment 91-02A through minute action. E. Adoption of a Resolution amending Resolution No. EH-161. Reap 11y su fitted, Hrad e City Tanner HB:NF: jfa Attachments; Exhibit "A" - August 14 and July 10, 1991, Staff Report Exhibit "H" - Draft MSnutee of August 16 and August 22, 1991 Meetings Exhibit "C" - SupQlemental Questionnaire ExhiDi[ ^D" - Draft Chapter of Desl gn Guidebook Resolution Amending Resolution No. HH-161 Resolution Recommending Approval of DG 91-02 Ordinance for DCA 91-02 Rea oluiion Recommending Approval of TVPCA 91-02 0[dinenee for TVPG 91-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of VPCA 91-02 Ordinance for VPCA 91-02 332 CITY OF RANCHO CCCA]IOSGA STAFF REPORT ~% GATE: August 19, 1991 }n'~l T0: Chaircan and Members of the Planning Commission `~ FROM: Brad eu ller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT roof AMENDMENT 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to amend various development standards and deaf qn guidelines for multi-family residential districts. Si afE reco®ends issuance of a Negative Declaration. !Continued from July 10, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMfiNT AND 6R IWANDA SPEC IF ZC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request Co amend var ioua development standards and desi qn gui delinea far multi-family reai dential districts within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. Staff reco®ends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued Erom July 10, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSPffiNP AND TfiRAA VISTA PLANNW COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Terra Vista Planned Coamunity area. StaEP recammenda issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from July 10, 1991.) ENVZRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNW COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A request to amend var ioua development standards and deai gn guidelines Eor multi-family residential districts within the Victoria Planned Coommnity area. Staff recouteende 199uance of a Negative Dec lazat ion. (Continued from July 10, 1991.) R AC RGROUND: On July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the above-described amendments and receive pu blrc input. The Commission raised concerns over Several proposed development standards, speciPicnlly, the minimum lot width, the requirements of recreational area/facilities, the building sepasation and setbacks stander da, the requirements of lockable atarage space, and Laundry facilities. The Commission continued the public hearing to this regu iar meeting so that they could conduct workshops to Eurt her ce view these identified items. Two workshops were held on July 1R and August 1, 1991• Representatives from Lewis Momea and the Nilliam Lyon Company and design professionals attended the wor kahopa and partlcipeted in the discuas:ons• Draft minutes of the July 10, 1991 pu bllc hearing and the minutes from the workshops of July 18 and August 1, 1991, eze included in this report for your reference. PLAN"IING CCMM ISSION STAFF nE FO RT OCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ^e SPA 91-02 - CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 14, 7991 Page 2 ANALYSIS; This section of the report focuses on the changes and re E.nements of she proposed development standards based on the July 18 and August 1, 1991, workshops. The duly 70, 1997, Staff Report has been a ttacn ed to this report for additional reference mater is 1. A. Minimum Lot width, Minimum Fro niage, and Flag Lot Fro nta qe Under the Basic Development Standards. The Commission vas concerned with the proposed standard of a 100-foot minimum lot vid th and a 50-foot minimum Corner lot width, as the standard implied :hat multi-family projects would have to provide a 700-foot loC vid th. Ano th e[ concern raided by the Cosmission was whether the parts la that do not meet this standard would be allowed to be developed. The intent of this propoeed standard vas to insure multi-family projects comply with the design criteria of a visually pleasing streets cape. Therefore, the propoeed siendard rnuld be better reflected under the category of minimum street frontage and flat loi street frontage. For parcels that do not meeC the minimum street frontage, staff recommended that Footnote "L" be refined so that these substandard parcels can be developed at the loweei end of the permitted density range. The propoeed changes are included in the attached ordinance. H. Recreational Aieae/Facl lit ies. Concerns were raised at the July 10, 1991, pdbl is hearing chat the recreational amens ii es regal rementa could be eco restrictive. For example, the propoeed minimum width dimension of 50 feet and 100 feet Eor large open Lawn area and the required number of recreational amens ci ea for development oonaistlnq of 31-100 unite appeared to be too restrictive. At the workshop of July 1B, 1991, the Co®iasion reviewed the ideniif led concerns a9 well as the modificat lan to the standard au ggested by staff. The Co®ission recoamended the following changes as discussed in that workshop: Oe velopment consisting of 31-100 units Should provide two ae is of recreational amenities. Staff also refined the criteria by add inq language [o allay flexibility for the designer to provide the equivalent of [vo sets of recreational amenities. For example, a development rnuld be equ loped with one large spa (double the sizel instead of providing two smaller span, subject to Plannlno Commission review and approval. The minimum width dimension of 50 feet and 100 feet for large lawn areas was modified to state chat at leant one of the dimensions she 11 be 50 feet for de velopmenta of 70 unl to or less and 100 feet for dews lopmenta consisting of 101 to 200 un1G. 33~) PLANK LNG CO.MM:55ION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, EGPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Auqus^_ 16, 7991 Psge 3 3• Water tap requ uemenu were deleted from the barbecue facility. 4• For development consisting of 101-200 uni tg, language was added to allow flexrbi lity to provide the equivalent of the recreational amenities subject [o Planning Commission iev iew and approval. 5. The criteria Eor maintenance of recreational amenit iea wag revised to include property own ere. Accra rdinq to the City Attorney, the p rr vats assessment district alternative should be retained in the crlteLld. C. Amenl tlt9 1. The requirement of 125 cubic feet of storage space rat refined as shorn in the aetaehed Ordinance. The word "lockable" was deleted. At the wotkshopr the Commission also Clarified that the storage space unit within the fully enclosed garage may overheng into the parking apace as long as St did not interfere with vehicle parking. 2. laundry Facility: The proposed standards allowed a project to develop with a coamon laundry Lacllity instead of providing each unit with a washing machine and clot hen dryer. The Commission felt that rental prof ecte should provide a minimum percentage of the total number of units with a washlnq machine and clothes dryer and the remainder pezcehta qe with the flex1611 ity of providing either washing machine and clothes dryer hook-ups with those units or coamon Laundry EaciLitien at the rate o! one washing machine and clothes dryer per 5 uni tn. The following alternative standards are provided Eor your conelderetlon: (al Aliernative "A": Each unit shall be provided alth a hook-up for a waahinq machine and clothes dryer Sh the interior of the dwelling. ATere washing machines and dlothea dryers are not prowl ded, co®on laundry fact litiee shall be required at a rate of 1 waahinq machine and clothes dryer per 5 units. Coon laundry Eeel Lities shoo ld be convenlently located for all resldentn within the tromp lex. Common laundry far ili[les can be within free-standing buildings, attached to dwelling uni te, or within the recreation room. The design of the common laundry fac3li[ies shall be architecturally compatlD ie [o the dwellings. (bl Alternative "B": For non-rental development, each unit the L: be provided viN a hook-up Lor a weshinq machine and clothes dryer in the interior of the dwelling. For re nta; development, 50 percent of the total number of un lea aha ll w pzovlded with a waahinq machine and clothes dryer in the dwelling unit, and the remaining 50 percent shall be prow: iel 33 s- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RE PO R^. DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VP CA 91-02, ES PA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONGA August 14, 1991 Page 4 with a, washing machine and clothes dryer hook-up in the rn terior of the dwelling unit or common laundry facilities at a rate of 1 washing machine and clothes dryer per 5 units. in addrtion to these alternatives, the Covmia lion ccu Ld also drr ect staff to prepare an amendment to the Condominium Conversion Ordinance requiring each unit to De equipped with a washrnq machine and clothes dryer hook-up prior to conversion. This new requirement would prohibit those dove Lopmenta that have been provided with common laundry facilities, to be later converted to con dom miuma. D. Building Separations and Setbacks. Concerns were raised by Lewis Homes and the X1111am Lyon Company that [he proposed stands tds were too restrictive. The Planning Commission reviewed these standards again at the August 1, 1991, workshop. The commission directed staff to modify the proposed standards ae summarized below: 1. eor development consisting of one- and two-story product type, in Metlium, Medium-Nigh, and High Re9ldential districts, the front-to- front building separation should be as follows: (a) A minimum of 30 feet aepezation between buildings where there ie no patio fence or with recessed be lcony. (b) A minimum of 10 Ceet between two patio Eencas that are Less than 5 feet in height. (c) A minimum of 20 feet between two patio fences that are more than 5 feet in height and between balconies. (d) A minimum of 20 feet between a patio fence and a building wall. (e) A minimum of JO feei between two building walla with a common patio fence or wall. 2. development consisting of three stories or more product type, in Medium, Medium-High, or High Resl dential districts, requires an addrt Tonal 10-foot separation between the two building walls foc eeeh floor or story above the ascend story. 7. The building to one-story detached garage and accessory structures separation for Hi qh Realden[ial district, ves reduced £rom the proposed 20 feet to 15 feet. 33c~ PLANNING CGM.M ISSION STAFF RE PGRT DCA 91-02, TVP CA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF HANCHO CDCAMGNGA August id, 7991 Page 5 4. The building to curb separation for the Nigh Residential dist nct wag reduced from the proposed 20 feet to 15 feet for development consisting of too-story product types. An additional 5-foot setback is required for each floor or story above the second story up to a ma zimum of 25 Eeet. The above Chan qes are zefle eted in Teb la 17.08.060 (Q) as shown in the attached ordinance. E. Related Items as Discussed at the August 1, 1991 Norkahop. The Commissioners a19o discussed issues of location and maintenance problems created Dy downspout, the placement of meters/utl lity housing, and the maintenance problems for the section of walls between garage9. Staff recommends the following design guidelines to address these issues: 1. Downspouts should be architecturally integrated into the building design. Where downapoub end et a lAndeceped area, splash guards should 6e provided. Prefernblyr doampouts should be piped to a paved surface or into the landscaped area. 2. Landscaped areas Detaeen garnge doors should be deai geed for tree or vertical shrub planting. Netera and other ground-mounted equipment should not be located within the landscepad area. 3. Tha Location and placement of meters/utility housing should be oriented away from the dael llnq unit entry. The meter/utility housing should be architecturally integrated into the building. FACTS FOR FINDLNGS: The P1annlnq Co®laaion must make the following findings in order [o approve, all or In pert, the proposed amendments: A. Development Code Amendment 91-02. The proposed amendment does not conf llet alih the land use policy of the General PLan. 2. Tha proposed amendment promotes the cpala and objectives of the General PLan. Tha proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental Co adjacent propezt iea or have a si gniti cant impact on the environment. B. Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02. The proposed amendment le cone intent with [he goela and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plen. 3 7 PLANlIING COMM I55ION STAFF REPORT ^CA 91-02, TVP CA 91-02, VP CA 91-02, ES PA 31-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 16, 1991 Page 6 2. The proposed amendment would not have si gnif scant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. ... Terra Vrsta Planned Commum ty Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2• The proposed amendment wi 11 not have si gnitic ant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties. RECOMI.IENDATION: Staff re covmends that the Planning Co®lasi on conduct a public hearing to review the proposed amendments and to consider public input. The following actions are requea tad Erom the Planning Conm season: A. Recommend approval of Development Code Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to Che City Council. B. Recommend approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. C. Recommend approval of Terca Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. D. TaDLe the Etiwanda Specific Plen Amendment 91-02A through minute action. E. Adoption of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 8E-161. Rea illy s to , Bra er City Tanner DB:NF:jfa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - July 10, 1991, Staff Report Exhibit "R" - Approved Minutes of April 6, April 11, April 25, and Mey 8, 1991 Adjourned Meetings Exhibit "C" - Draft Mlnutee of July 10, July 19, and August 1, 1991 Nee tinge Exhibit "D" - Supplemental Queeticnnai re Exhibit "E" - Draft Chapter of Design Guidebook Proposed Resolution Amending Reeol ut ion No. 8E-161 Proposed Resolution Recomlending Approval of DCA 91-02 Proposed Ordinance for DCA 91-OZ Prapoaed Resolution Recommending Approval of TVPCA 91-02 Proposed Ordinance for TVPCA 91-02 Propaeed Resolution Recommending Approval of VPG 91-02 Proposed 0[dinance for V-P2~CA 91-02 J30 CITE' qF ft.~NCHO l: CC'A~fO\GA STAFF REPORT ~~ GATE: .TUly 10, 1991 ~~ TO: C.•,a-tman and Members of ^_he Plannrng Commissaon FROM: Brad Bu 11e r, Ci[y Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior PLnnner SDBJ ECT: ENVI RONN.ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMCNGA - A request to amend various deve lapmant atandarda and deaf gn guidelines Coz multi-family residential districts. BlaCf re co®ends iaeuance of a Negative Dec location. (Continued [ram Juna 12, 1991.) ENVIRON!lENTAL ASSESSMENT AND STIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02A - CITY OP RANCHO CoCAMONGA - A request to amend var ioua development standards and daalgn guidelines Eor multi-family re ai dentl al diatrlct• rithln the EGiranda Spec>f is Plan arse. Staff reeoooanda Suuancs o! a Negetlve Dec laratlon. (Continued fros Juna 12, 1991.) ENVIRGNMENTAL A5365SMBNf AND TERM VISTA PLANNED COMIUNITY AMENDMENT 91-OZ - CITY OF MNCID CVCAMONGA - A request to amend various development atandarda and daalgn guidalinea Por multi-family residential districts rithln the Terra Vista Planned Comunity area.. Staff rammsenda issuance of a Negative Dec laraticn. (Continued from Suns 12, 1991.) EN VI RONMEHTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various dove lapmant atandarda and deal gn guidelines Eor multi-family reaidantial district wlChin Na Victoria Planned Comunity area. Sta[f rem~ends iafuanea oC a Negattw Declaration. (COntinwd Crw JuM 12, 1997.) I. AESTMCTt The pu t'poae o[ this report is for the Plenninq Coamiasion to revier and coNidsr action on verloua code changes ra leting to multi-fully deve lopaant. The goal Cor these rnd. changaa is to enhance the comunlty character and the quality oC life for resldenea in multi-featly prof ac U. The tollorinq actions ere requested Crom the Planning Comsie •ion. A. Recommend approval o[ Development Code Amandmsnt 91-02 end she isauancs of a Negative Dec laratlon to the City Council. B. Pecommend approval of Terra Vista Planned Co®unlty Amendasnt 91-OZ and the issuance oL a Negative Declaration to the City Counm 1. Y CANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-D2, TVpCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESFA 91-02 - CIT.Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tn lY 10, 1991 Pa 9e 2 _. Re cortmend approval oC Victoria Planned Community Amendment 97-92 and the issuance of a Negenve Declaration to the ~:.Cy Council. D. Staff recommends tabling Etiwanda speci Eic PLan Amendment 91-02A (see discussion in the Anal yais section of thss reportl• E. Staff recomen da approval of a resolution amending Reaol ution No. 88-161 regarding the landscape policy. II. 9ACkG ROUND: On February 26, 1991, the Clty Council adopted a resolution charging the Comiaaion vith the responsibility to modify the City's development standards and deal gn guidelines Co ensure high quality multi-family projects. To assist the Comiaaion in this reaponaibl lity, ateft prepared a study with recomendatlone Cor changes to various dove LOpmant standards and design quidallnea. Tha study and the proposed changes rare bawd on staff analyzing the currant development etendarda contained in Lha Development Coda, comparing them to Lhe Terra Vlata Planned Comunity, the Victoria Planned Comunity, and the Btirands 3pecitic Plan, as well m revierinq them rith the past pracLlcas and policies of the Comiaaion. The proposed changae focused on various site development standards ensuring Steps for proper transition o[ danalty and compatibility of uaa, upgrad>ng the open apaq requltamenta and the [slat<d recreational amenities, upgrading the architectural requi cements, Via [tor parking and Other related project emenltiH. TTa Comiaaion conducted a aeries of rorkahope to reeler tM ear Sau4 proposed changes. Rep rewntatlvn from the property orneu of the ero planned comunitiea, Loris Homes and ri 111m Lyom Company, as [ell other developers and design pro[ewlotuls attended the rorkahopa and provided input to the ComLaim and atslf. Atteehad for your reference is Ns sumary and action of the Plannl ng Comiaaion workshops o[ April a, 11, and 25 end !Ly 3, 1991 (BzhibiL "A"1• in the concluding rorluhop, the Comiaaion provided spacif is direction to eta [f to pnpan the attached Dow lopmant Code Amendmanta and Planned Comunity Amendment^ as dLcuuad in iha Ana lysls aectian oC this report. III. ANALYSL3: This section of the report [ocusas on deecribin q, diacuaeang, and analysing the various proposed changes to the development standards and deal qn gul de lino Heating to multi-tamely pro]ecG within tM citywide arse, Che fro planned cnmunltlas area and the Etlwanda Specific Plen area. The format consists oC elating the eziselnq codas, the proposed <hangn or the proposed now codes, Collored by an analysts o[ the changes. 3`io PLANN ZNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91 -02, VPCA 91-92, FSPA 91-02 - CITY OF RAHCHO CUCAMON GA SuIY 10, 1991 Page 3 A. Development Code. Development Standarda. a. Eatab liah a minimum net lot area under sas •c and optional Standarda. Exit Ling: No minimum net lot area or acreage required. Proposed: 3 acres minimum far sea lc Standarda and S ncrea for Op[Sonnl Standarda. Analysis: Pequizing a minimum lot area would encourage lot consalldatlon and thereby provide a greater opportunity for a mca efficient tits design. Under the Basic Standards, loG of legal record but lest Nnn 3 actaa would G allowed to develop et the laweat end Is.g., under 9 dwelling units per acre for the Mediae Waldentlal Dietriet) of LM pamltted density range. xhe reawns are iro fold. First, staff recognized that there ate approximately 70* lots whleh era under 3 scree and currently designated a• Medium Residential rith no development proposals. This provision would el for for deVelopmapt of Neee paresis if the applicant or developer is unable to assemble enough lou to meet Ns minimum Lot area. Second, the limitation of the allocable density would incruu the chsnces that the site design would comply with all the development atandards, dufgn qu1de11nes aM policies u with Note for Lrgar parnL. A 5vcre minimus is proposed for pra]ects rLhing to develop under the Optional Standards. Optional Standards exist to al for for development at a higher end of the density range. Low IL1 and Low Medium (LM) t4aidentlel DSatr1<te slready require a minimum of 5 acre. Eatabliahing the S-acre minimum lot arse in Ne Optiarul Standards could be consistent rlth the oNer dava lopment dietricq. b. Wtabtlsh a minimum lot vidN toe Buic Standards. 6x feting: M - SO-toot lot widN - l0-foot corner Lot width N!1 - No miNmllm [egYlresent H - No minimum requirement 341 PWNNING COMM ISSI CN STAFF EiE PO RT OCA 91-02, TVP CA 91-02, VP CA 31-02, FSPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Pa 4e 4 Proposed: M - 100-foot lot width - 50-foot corner lot ridth MH - same an above H -Same as above Ana lysia: At one of the Commia•ion wor kahopa, members of the Coeminaion brought up the inane of minimum lot width as a rasa It of reviewing n couple of nerror lot multi-family prmjectn. The conce[ne were with the design of Ne entry to the project and the s tree tecepe. Eat ablinhing a ¢inimw lot widN of 100 feet would facilitate more spacious site plane and comply with the minimum site design criteria. These design criteria could include an estimtad 40-Coot entry driveray, a 40-Coot estimated building footprint, and an approximate 15-20 foot as[baek from the property line. This nar •Candard could impact some oC the lots on 19th Berut and Arror HL ghray. Modity and establish rtew standards for building aepsrations and aatDSCka from property line for Basic and Optional Standards. Malyeis: The distance batwun buildings and the setbacks Erom property line eta sateDliehad to provide Ear an element o[ opsnnau end human seals. Un[artunately, the minimum eLndards became [he design maximw in many projects. The Co~lssion ear a need to improve the standards the[ will M conaiatent with the pollc iaa in Na Community Design Blemant of the General Plan. Under Us Baalc standards Cor the Medium Ruidantlal District, the building separation is 30 feat for Eront to Cront and 15 tact [or otMr situations. In most cans, tM buildings have patlw encroached Lnto the 30 tut aaparation diseases loving pachaps 5-t0 feet [or landeceplnq and peMstrian ralkways. Thw, the separation between the buildings appears to be clover. TM nw standards, a• shorn In Exhlblt "P," indicate that the bui Lding aapazation wder the Medium Ruldenelal District appear to M decreased. Howwar, staff added s provls ion u+at will regal ra all Dullding separations or setbacks to N musured Crom any ucloud balcony or enclosed patio 3 Cut or more in height. This, in efface, will lneresu the dlstancu batrun Dulldings. Por Madlum High end High Rasidantisl DisCrlcis, the Dullding aeparatlons are half the combined height o[ the tro bui ldings. Bteff expected chat any development rlthin chess fro 3~Z PIANN I9G COMMIES: JN ET AFF RE 20 RT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-D2, °EJA 31-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA Suly 10, 1991 page 5 des tz icls may include a nix of two-, three-, oc four- story 6ui:dinga. Ey usin4 this formula tc determine the distances for building saps ra[i on, it would achieve the goal of providing openne sa rithin the project. For example, a [hcee-ato[y building of 35 feet in height and a two-story building of 25 feet in height would require a distance eeperat ion of 30 Eeet. Aga m, the dlatancea are meaau xed Exom any enc lowed balcony or patio. In addition to the building separation, other new standards aze establish ea, as shorn in Exhibit "F," to achieve the objectives of visually aaftening the Duilding bulk, the building edges, and the denalty. Illustrative grephiea tar these nev standards aze developed to reiterate and support them. ECalf would like to acknorledge the assistance of twwi• Romes rho aasisiet] in the development of theca graphic SllWtratlona. d. Raerestional eras/Pac111ty. Exlsting: Required neteational asenl ties such as pools, epee, court, and reereselon mess within wmon open spnce. proposed: Require apeelf lc typo of amenities for projects under 30 un1U, projeeta 31-100 unite, and pro}scb over 700 uni ta, as shown in Exhibit "C.^ analysis: Although tM [rode currently requires rec reatlonal amsnitlas, as described above, within the cooon open apace, then are ro provisions regulating she amunt oC amenitiel provided to she sin of Ue multi-tesily pro}act. The Co~iulon wr a need to improve the ex lacing cOQef Dy utabllMing new standards for requiring amenltiu. TM ner codes set minlsum atandsrds for providing rscrsational amenities by CDs sSn of the pro}act rhl is aLO providing [1sxlDi llty to eh• Mveloper as to the typo of asenitiu offend. Provisions an added to require proper end logical diapernl of ncratlonal ansnlties. This provision is eddsd to avoid the concentntlon of all of the amenities within nny one cosswn opm epees area. EeGblish nav standards for pro}sct amenities tc inc lads exterior lockable storage spats and laundry Lac tittles as shown Sn Ezhiblt "R," and as follors: Exterior lockable storage apace of 125 cubic feet. 3~~3 PLANNING COMFIISSION STAFF REPORT OCA 91-02, °. VPCA 31-02, VP CA 91-02, ES PA 31-72 - CITY OF RANCNJ CVCAMONGA July 10, 7991 Page 6 Each unit shall be furnished rich was he cs/dryers in the inte aor or common Facility provided at a rate of one washer/dryer per Eive units. Analysis: The purpose of eataDlish ing the now standard is to enhance the quality of lire Eor the re a>.de nta (homeornera or re mere alike) within multi- family proj ec ta. Further, [his new standard would be consistent rith the requirements ae contained in the current Condominium Conversion O[dinance. SsiaDlieh ner atandetda requiring proper ai gnage to identify visitor perking as eho.m Ln Sxhibtt "i." Analysis: The concern is that vial[or puking spaces are not properly ident ifiad where visitors may find it hazd trying to locate them. Also, visitor parking spaces are often used Dy rasidmnts St Nmy are not properly signed. Tha ner standards require the developer or the applicant to submit a elgnagm packsge foz visitor parking to the C1[y Planner Cor revier and approval. Si gna ga may include individual aigna Labeled on the pavement, directory signs, etc. Absolute Policies Tha Development Code ham AbwluN Polltlu that are intended to deal ritll the Sssuas of neighborhood eompatibiliiy, mitigate Land uma wnf Nets through buttering, quality sits plan, eirculation, and architectural compatibility, mtc., ss shown in Exhibit "J." At lhmsm rarkshopm, tlu Cosmluloe reviewed the Lengwgm and Cound St edsquats. Tha only modif leatlon that thm Co~luion proposed L to change thm word "can" to "shall" for on• of th• land umm mltigatlon mmaaures as SdantlClmd Sn ExhlDlt "J." Thm purpop is to strengthen thm raqulramants !or transition of dmnmlty. Dmsi gn GuiGllna Thm Dsvslopmmnt Code has Dsslgn Guidsllnu which estsDli sh a high quality standard [or building end site desi qn. Thmq qu1dm11no ar• God on tM cosaunlty design goo is as expteumd in ehm Ganmral plan. TM Co®SSS ion, has ra viwad thmsa guide lino and, in gsnmral, agrsmd that they ors adequate In ensuring high quality dmsl gn. However, emvsral aru• should ba •tnngthmnad and upgraded to be mare rst lactlvs of the community dulgn goals as stated in th• Ganmzal Plan. The propoud change arm as shown in Exhibit "K" end aze in bold pzSnt. 3~ty PWNN ING COMM ISS IJN STArF PE POftT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 31-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 31-92 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQJGA Culy 10, 1991 Page ] a. Building orientation: i.an gua ge added to encourage a variety of building design. b. Parking: Ianqua qe added Co require solid walls far separation between individual single, double, or multi garage unite alai goad to Chet unit. Also, the inside dimension of the single garage unit increased to 10 feet by 20 feet. c. Landecepin g/open gq ce: Language added to Strengthen the requirement for large masses of open space consistent rith the policies a• atntsd in the Community Design Elment of the General Plan. d. Architecture: Tha language was moditisd to explicitly state that multi-family projects should have upgraded archleeeture. e. Scala: Ianguags was added to rsquir• praporticnate ma as and sea le o! buildings boU horizontally and vertically. This Lngunge Ss mnlstsnt with the policies an stated in the Community Dmlgn Elment of the General Plan. t. Nateria la and Color: Lngnga added to etrangthen the nned for choice of matsriala and color that compliment the arehitectura and building character. Related items not pert of the Dsvelogant Coda Amendment. At the wozkshoq, the Cosaiuion raised rnncsrn rich hov to encore hl qh quality design Cor mu ltl-tinily projects ref lactivs of t7:s City'• dsdrs, hor to inform the davalogsnt comsmnlty of high standards of dad qn, end how to enaurs quality oL landscaq maUrla ls. To addrua the Comisdon'• concern, scat[ racomsnds that a aupplmencal qumtionsirs W Mvelogd nqulring Ns Gvslogr to sutslt Sntormatlon supporting the ma rSG o[ the dsvalopmant proqul. SlaCt also indlcapd an Sntarlm draft chapter of Chs Gdgn gui dsbaok Cor multi-lm11y projseU could be prsparad to assist th• davsloppnt wssmnity in dad going projects consistent r1Ul ehs City'^ design goals. Staff also prepared a Asaolution mending th• previon one by st rengMminq tM policy to require Landsaaq archSGCt'• to lnsgct the quality o[ eh• landsoapa mat aria is prior to pLnting. Thass nqui rementa and procsduru ere described Dslor: 345' OCA 91-J3, TVP^_A g1-0 z, VPCd dt -J2, ZSPd ?t-;z - C1TY OF PAYCHO COCAMON Gd July ID, 1991 Page 8 Supplemental Questro nnarre. The format Eor this supplemental requi:ement is as shown in Exhibit "L." The burden of proof is on the developer and his designer em articulate in mitten Eorm, graphic rlluatrations, or a comDl net ion of both, how the p[opos ed development meets earn one of the Absolute Polici ea and Design Gui deli nee. The Development Code s pecilica lly requires that all reai dente al projects must as tisfy Che Abamlute Policies end De ai gn Guidelines before approval can be granted. Staff would review the aupplementel questlonmire for comp leteneaa and adequacy. Dpan comp leteneas of the supplemental queetlonnaire, the City planner or his deai gnee would make determination if the development proposals meat and satisfy mch one of the policies and quidelinee prior to forwarding tM project far Planning Co®iseion consideration. This ner requirement and procedure would hopsfu lly achieve the ob}active of ensuring high quality design. b. Graft cnapter of Desl qn Guidebook for multi-family project. The Design Guidebook i• on the planning rork program, however, it is behind in schedule. In order to address the Co®Saeion'e conwrns on informing the development community of quality design, staff prepared a dratt•ehapter o! the Dasi qn Guidebook for multi-family projscta as an interim solution. TRe format of the Design Guidebook Ss as shown Sn Exhibit "M." Section 1 clearly atatea the deign goals of the City. Section 3 Bate Ne daaign objsciivas or design goals as exp[ealed in the Csneral Plan followed by mor• apse ifie cr Maria including graphic illustrations. Tha graphic illustrstlons provided are almpls and rough. 1TSe draft chapter of the Deai gn Culdsbook Ss not cnatpleG. Stslf will continua to prepare and add to the Guidebook psrtinant design criteria rich the accompanying graphics. Eventually then staff is reedy !o prepare the entire deai gn guidebook thi• chapter will W Lneorporatsd. c. Propowd amendment to Resolution Mo. BB-161. The CommLSion on August 10, 1938, adopted a formal policy requiring registered Landscape Architects to prepare, certify, and lnapect the installation of landscape malaria la and irrigation systems. At the workshop, the Coa•i elan raiasd concerns rith the quality of landscape matarlala, speclf SCally trees, shrubs, and ground cover. To address [M concern, staff recommends that the exiating polity W strengthened to require [he Landscape Architect to inspect and certify the quality of the landscape materials prior to planting. 34 co PLANNING COMMISSION >TAFF DEPORT OCA 91-92, TVPCA 91-02, Vp CA 91-42, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMW GA duly 10, 1997 gage 9 PLann ed Coumiuni ties. At the workshops, the Commission reviewed the comparison of development standards among the Development Code, the two planned communities (Victoria and Tecra Vista), and the Etiwanda Specific Plan (gee Exhibit "C"). The comparison shoved that there are die cr epanci ea and diFfere aces in the development standards, apeciC LCelly Che street setbae kg, building sepaza eiona, and building se tbacke from the property Line. Also, the eoaaeuniLy plan text Lacked general deli qn gui delinea and criteria for [rang ition of density. The Coamiasion recognized that at the time of eatabliehing the two planned co®unitiea, additional open apace and open apace Linkages were set aaiG in exchange foz flexibility Sn the street setback. ITe Co®iNion directed stet[ to bring Ne standards of the two planned rnmmnlties into consistency wiN one another. RsprNentaGlvN Crom bosh property owners, Lewis Homes end WS lllam Lyon Company, agrwd. Tha follorlnq sections des cribs and discua• the propogd changN to N• two co®unlty plea texts. Victoria Planned Com•unity. a. Modify street Ntbacks for Medium. Medium Xigh, and High Raaidsnelal DistrSCG a• shorn in Exhibit "0." The modl[icatlon hfLets the setback ae measured from the ultimate curb [ace consistant vi[h the Terre Vista Planned Community and cityride area. Tha et re et setback far arterial streets, except for Victoria Parkray, have been Sncrusad from 12 to 38 het. b. lietablish a Nw standard requiring tM addition of a 10-toot satGck wMn the project Ss adj scant to Very Lor or Lw Rssldsntial Dlrtrlcts. ThL nw •tandasd could W consisGnt w1 t.. Ue Development Code Standssds. TM purpoN Sa to alloy foz a propec buffer cone betwNn coat licting Lad uNS. c. Establish nw building aapacatlolls and setback standards Crom the property line by nferendnq the standards ss contained In the Development Code. d. Gtebliah nor provisions by adding Langwge requiring cluebr development or multi-Cully projects to comply with eha Daslgn GuidellnN as rnntained in the Dave lopmNt Codm. •. Add nw provisions requlrlnq transition o[ dens Siy ae eontalned In the Development Code. 34~ PLANNING ^-OMM ISSLJN STAFF REPORT OCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91 -02, ES Pp 91-72 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Scaly 10, 1991 Page 10 2. Terra Vista Planned Coamwni ty• a. Modify the street setback Por localr collector, and secondary streets by increasing the atan dardn to be consistent with Victoria Planned Co®uni ty and as shown in Exhibit "P." b. Eatab Lish a new standnrd requiring the addition of a 10-Coot setback when the project is adjacent to Very Low or Law Residential DSstrlete consistent with the standards in the Development Code. c. Eecabliah new building separations and setback standards from the property line Dy adding languages refarencing the atendarde as contained in the Development Co G. d. establish new provisions by adding language requiring wlii-fmily projects to comply with iha Design Gut delinea ae contained In the Development Code. e. Add ner provisions requiring the transition of density as contained in the Development Code. Copie• oC tM proposed changes to the tro planned romunlties rare distributed Lo the tro property owners, Lsris Homes and Nillim Lyon Company. Staff has mat rith them to ravisr the proposed mandmenta. They have agreed to matt of the proposed mendments. C. Btlrenda Specific Plan: In nviwinq and rneptrinq the multi- Cmaly development standards beewan the Development Code and the 8tlranda Specific Plan, the CoamLLSSlon deGrminad that the Speci [ic Plan has edequau prwLloN to guide multi-Cmily projects. Therefore, amendment ate not necueary. D. environmental Auusment: The propond mendmeni consists o[ changing Mwlopwnt standards and design quidellno rhlch would not cruU a signl[icant Impact to the environment. Staf[ nw~ends issuance of Negati va Dec larationa. IV. FACTE FOR PI NDING9: The Planning Comiasion muK maKe the following f indanga In order to approve, 1n all o[ in part, the proposed amandtaants: A. Dave lopman! Code Amendment 91-02. 1. The propoDad amendment does not conflict w1U the Lnd we policy oC the Central Plan. 34B PLANNING CO NMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, EGPA 91-OZ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Suly 10, 1991 Page /1 2. The proposed amendment promotes she goals and o6jecti vas of the General Plan. 3. The proposed amendment would not be materially 1n]uY lone or detrimental to adjacent properC lea oz have a significant impact on the environment. B. Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02. t. the proposed amendment is cansiatent with the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would rtot have ai gnificant impecta on the environment nor the surrounding properties. C. TeYYa Vlsta Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment i• conalatent rLN the goals and objecel vea of the Speci[ic Plan end the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment rill not haw aignif leant impecta on the environment, noz the cur rounding properties. V. CORPESPONDENCB: The above daecrlbad proposed amendments have been advertised in the Inland Valley Da11y Bulletin narapaper as a public hearing under an 1/BN page ad. In addition, pu611c hearing notices rare Bent to all property orwrs Nat haw land dasl gnatad as Nedium, Medium Nigh, or tllgh Reddantial Dlstrlces and without a dawlopment proposal. VI. RBCOlPIBNDATIDN: 9Gtf racoa~ende Net Na Planning Co®iasion conduct a public hurlnq to nviw the propoaad asandsanta and to cone Ldsz public Input. The follorin9 actions era requested from the Plaminq Co~luloa: A. Approval oC Devalopmant Code Amendment 91-02 and iuuanca of a Nsgatlw Dec Lration to the Clty Councl 1. R. Approval o[ Victoria Planned Coaaunlty Amendment 91-02 and >.seuancs of a Negstiva Dac laration Co Cha City Council. C. Approval Terza VLta Planned Community Amendment 91-02 end tssua nce of a Negatlw Dac laration to Ne tlty Connell. D. Table N• Etiranda Spaclf is Plen Amendment 91-02A. B. Adopelon o[ • Ruolutlon amending Msolue Ion No. 88-161. 344 pLANNING COMMIEBIJN STAFF REPORT UCA 91-03, TVPCA 91-02, VP CA 91-02, ESPA 91-92 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 12 Re~ 11y submitted, /l l Bra let Cs ey Pla nnet BB:NP:jfa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Summary and Aetione of April 6, April 11, Aptil 25, and Nay S, 1991 Norkehops Bxhibit "e" - Approved Minutes of Apr11 6, and Unapproved Minutes of Apr11 11, April 25, and Hey S, 1991 Adjourned Maetings Exhibit "C" - Table I Comparison o! 9ereat Setbacks exhibie "D" - Table 17.03.0{0-B - Basic Development Standards Exhibit "E" - Table 17.08.040-C - Optional Development Standards Exhibit "P" - Table 17.03.040-Q -Building 9aperatioN and Setbaciu Exhibit "G" - Secelon 17.03.000-G - Recreatlon/Pacility Exhibit "H" - Section 17.03.0{0-R - Proj eat Amenities Exhibit "I" - Section 17.03.040-R - VSeltar Parking Exhibit "J" - Section 17.03.050 - Absolute Policiaa Exhibit "R" - Section 17.08.090 - Design Guidelines Exhibit "L" - Supplessntal Qugtionnalre Exhibit "M" - Draft Chapear of Design GuldabooK 6zhibit "N• - AmanAlente to Ruolutlan 33-161 Exhiblt "O" - Amendsents to Victoria Planned Coanunity Exhiblt "P" - AmendmenU to Terra VLta Planned Community Proposed Msolutlon Asending Msolution No. Be-161A Proposed 14solution Rernmsendinq Approval o[ DG 91-OZ Proposed Resolution Aeco~ending Approval o[ TVPG 91-02 Propoud Aesolutlon Recomsending Approval of VPG 91-02 Proposed Ordinance [or OG 91-02 ProposM Ordinance Cor TVPG 91-OZ Proposed Ordinance for VPG 91-02 ~~ COMPARISON OF VARIOUS EXISTING AND PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Mlnlmum Lot Arae Mlnlmum lot Arn a 889ic - rone a Basic - 3 acres Optional - none b. Optional - 5 acres Mlnlmum Roetaga ~ tTrak Bropartt IIM .... MMMICm Predtaia 11t; Fren! WeVarq IIM s Lgnimtan tat FmrMag~.' 50 h ';. AMdMa1M..W/ - 1e0 ft Fes b. wnmaaefplgLaFrplapa ,, 3B t! ": ' S0 tt :~~¢-,i , ~ ~x~, BullAing Sepu-tlon Bulldlnp Baperatlon a Front to Fronl - 30 It a Front to Front • No Patio - 30 II Betwwn patio bwe leas than 5' in height without sidewalk - t0 ft Batwwn path Iona less than 5' in Might with sidewalk - 15 ft • Between Patio Iona more than 5' in heght - 20 II Between 6aldonias - 20 It Betwwn patio fens and building wall - 20 It Whh common polio Iona ~ 30 ft b. Omer - 15 It D. Other - 15 It c. Building to 7-atary gerape/tarpon - 15 ft tl. Building to curb - 15 II e. Building to orb at Project entry - 20 ft Baorntlenal helllpaa Plepatlella(.. faNlttla , • Oenanlry raquead pool lPa. krtdob ~, 9pabNk:' ggYk+tpNM! iN tplldrn: rscraatbn room -etc. • UeW/i tt0'e11Ra fallp~lty9 W t &aMA raaantbrtel ~ tMMlh!!'. ''. 0. 3t m IBO'uttia tr1>r~r~ ilA1N Y.~gtrhrtdlM to dolAtPa iM taAtlnMa! tAgW?!d kr' (ai 1Bi~ eb2g0'unR1 /aAW~'S. of 774tw tacremionM aMMitiat d For r1a01{ 2g0 unbr, aR aOWtlonal aN d item Icl project Amenltlu propel Amenltlaa None require 125 cubk feN of interior storage space require individual washer 8 dryer hookup for each unk or common IaurMry tecilitiea a1 a rain of ana washer 8 dryer par 5 unka EXHIBIT 3 " ~cn s l -02 r.c. ~-1 o-a 1 7VICA 9I~02 8-I4-sl VPCA 91.02 9.11-91 FSPA 91~02A ~~' GC. 11-8-91 Section 17.08.040 - E @r udln~Benarauor~ Where required In Table 17.08.040 - B and C . this sccUon sets forth rnlydmum requirements for building separaUOn and setback standards. TABLE 1 ~.OB.040 - E BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK STANDARDS DISTRICTS BUILDING SEPARATON AND SETBACK (A) M (C) MH (C) H (C) ( in lest ) BUILDING TO BUILDING IB) 1. FRONT TO FRONT a. No palq a feee55ed path 30 30 30 b. Between patio IencenvaA leu Man 5 M. in hepM (F) wilhoW sidewak (F) 10 10 10 -with sidewak (F) 15 15 15 e Between path lencerwaq more Ihan 511. in hepht 20 20 20 d. Between balconies above polio fence/wall more roan 5 ft. in height 20 20 ZO e, Between a patio lencenvall and a Griltluq wall 20 20 20 1. Wdh common paiio IencrJwall 30 30 30 2. OTHER 15 15 15 BUILDING TO ONE-STORY DETACHED GARAGE/CARPOR70R OTHER ACCESSORY 15 15 15 STRUCTURES(E) BUILDING TO CURB (E) 15(D) 15 (0) 15 (DI BUILDING TO CURB AT PROJECT ENTRY (patio wall 20 20 25 or fence shall not prgep ima the setback area) IAI BUILDING SHALL MEAN DWELLING UNTIS. IBI BUILDING SEPARATION STANDARDS FOR BUILDING 7D BUILDING SHALL BE FOR 'IWO-STORY DEVELOPMENT ONLY. ICI ADD TEN FEET FOR EACH FLOOR/STORY ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR/STORY FOR THREE OR MORE STORY BUILDINGS. IDI AUU FIVE FEET FOR EACH FLOOR/STORY ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR/STORY UP'IU A MAXIMUM OF TWENTY~FTVE FEET FOR THREE OR MORE STORY BUILDINGS . IEI PATfO WALL/FENCE AND PEDESTRIAN WAII(WAY MAY PROJECT' INTO THE SETEACK AREA PROVIDED A MINIMUM 10 FOOT Ap.EA SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE ANU CLEAR FOR LANDSCAPING, IFI BETWEEN BALCOMFS ADD 5 FEET. EXHIBIT 4 " DCA 91 ~02 P. C. 7~ 10-91 TVPCA 91.E e~ 14 ~91 vpcAAl-oz 3S Z s-u-91 ESPA 91 ~02A 0.C. 1 1 ~6-A I LIST OF DE9IGN POLICIES FOR MULTI-FAl~I.Y PRO.IECTS 1. Downspouts should be architecturalty integrated Into the building design Whett tlownspouts end at a landxaped area, splash guards should be D*'ovldcd. Preferably, downspouts should be piped to a paved surface or into the landscaped atta. 2. Landscaped areas lxtwcen Qarage doors should be designed Cor tree or vertical shrub planting. Meters and other ground-mounted equipment should not he loeatcd wi[h1n the landscaped area, 3, The location end placement of meters/utdlty houslmntitt should be oriented away from the dwelling unit entry. The meter/utlilty housing should be archltecturalty integrated Into the buddmg. 4. The scale and~helght of huddlryts should ttlate to one another. For example, a three-story budding should not 6e placed next to a one-story bulldtng. E]CFIIBIT " g t. OCA Dl-01 TVPCA D1-07 VPCA Dl-09 Q: llfi-Dl ~s3 EXHIBIT 6 " COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS. 91-134 , 91-135 & 91-136 DCA 91-02 'IVPCA 91-02 VP[,A 91.02 ESPA 91-02A P.C. 7-10-91 8-I4-91 9-11-91 0.C. 11-6-91 3sy RESOLUTION N0. ?1-1ii A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMHE ND INC APPROVAL Oe^ DEVELOPHE NT CODE AMENDHeNT 91-02, AHe^,NDING TITLE 1] OF THE RANCHO CUCAHONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARD INC VARIOU9 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DfiSICN GUIDELINES FOR MCLTi-FAHi LY REffiDENTIAL ^IS TRICTS, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEPEOF. A. Recitals. (i~ The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe fi Ld an applic aticn for Ceveiopment Code Amendment 91-02 as deecri bed in the title of to is Resolution. Here in of tar in this Aeao lot ion, the subject Development Dietriei amendment request is referretl to as "the application." (iii On April 24, and coot Lnuad to Hay E, Juno 12, July 30, August 14, August 22, and September 11, 1991, [ho Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on rho application. On September 11, 1991, the Commiae ion concluded said haatings. (iii All legal prerequisites co Cho adoption of thi• Reeolut ion haw occurred. B. Reaclut ion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,~de[arminad, and neolved by the Planning Commission of rho City of Rancho Cucamonga a• tollowe: I. This Comm iseion hereby epaciflce lly finds that all of the facts sec Eo rth in the Recitals, Part A, of thin Reeo lotion are true and correct. 2. eased upon sub Rant ial evidence presented to this Commise ion au ring she above-referenced public hearings on April 24, May B, June 12, July 10, August 14, and Septanibsr 11, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public twat imony, thi• Commission hereby epeciEicaLly Einda as EoLlowe: a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the Dist tict that ie euper:or to aevelopmant otherwise allowaD la under alternate regulaiione; and b~ That the Amendment will provide for development within the ^ strict in a manner cone iceent with the Censral Plan and with related development and growth management policies of Cha City. J. Based upon the eubetant ial ev •dana presented to this Comma s::r. during the aDOVe-referenced public hearings and upon tM •pacif is findings o. facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby Ends acd concludes as fol laws: 3~ PLANNING COMM:SS:ON RESOLD^. :ON NO. ;,-,-. OCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAHONGA September 11, 1993 Page 2 a) The Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. b) Tha Amendment will not create a significant adverse effect an the environment. 4. This Commission hereby Einde and cart if Tee that the project hoe been reviewed and consitlered in compliance with the Cali Eornla Environmental Quality Act of 197D and, Eurthat, this Commission hereby recommentle to the City council that a Negative Declaration be iseuetl. 5- Based upon the findings and ecnclusiona aet forth i.n paragraphs 3, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commie ion hereby rnolves as follows: (a) The Planning Commission hereby recammand• Chat the city Council approve and adopt Development Cods Amendment 91-02 to modify the Mun is ipal Cade per the attached Ordinance. (b) That a Certified Copy of thi• Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Comms•ion shall be toruarded to the City council. 6. The Secretary to this CommiseLOn shall certify to the adoption cE to ie Resolution. APRROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. PLANNING COMH7,A9ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA BY; ^ •I I Chairman L, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, end adopted by the Plann Ln9 Commission of the c xty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the PLann inq Commission held an the 11th day of September 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMM255I ONEAS: CHITIEA, MCNI EL, MEL CHER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSSONERS: TOLSTOY ~~ RESOLllTZON N0. 91-1'.5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CORN ISS ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMEND INC VAA IOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DES ZDN GUIDELINEE FOR NU LTL-FAMILY AESID ENT IAL DISTRICTS, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Rec hale (i) The city of Rancho Cucamonga ha• filed an applic at'_on far Terra vista Planned Community Amendment 91-03 as described in the title of this Rest lut ion. Herein aftaz in this Reea lut ion, the aubj act Terra Vista 2la nned Community Amendment request ie referred to ae "the application." (iii On April 24 and continued to May 9, .Tuna 12, July 10, August 14, Augu et 32, and September 11, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public Macinga on the application. Dn September 11, 1991, the Commies ion concluded acid Mar ing. ~iit) All legal pnrequ is itu to the adoption of this Aewlut ion have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it fie hereby found, dot srm fined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga e• follows: 1. This Commie ion hs nby specifically [inch that all o[ the facts sef forth in the Recitals, Pa[t A, of this Ruolut ion an true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial widenw preNnted Lo thi^ Commis ciao during the above-refsrencsd public hearings on April 34, May 8, June 12, July 10, August 16, and September il, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public tact imony, thi• Commission hereby spec iE ically finds as follows: a) That than Amendment will provide for development cf a comprehensively planned urban community within CM District that fie superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regale[ ions; and b) That the Amendment will provide for dsvelapmene within the ^istrict in a manner consistent with Che Censral Plan and with related deve io pmenc and growth menagsme nt policies of the Clty. J. Based upon the aubatant Lal evidence prase nt ed to this Comm iss:on during the above-r of orencetl publu hearing and upon the specit is findings o. facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and coot lades as follows: 3S 7 PLASN:RG COY_N:SS;OY R=SOL9:;OF •:O. ~ _ ~_ :V?CA 31-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA.NO::GA September 11, 1391 ?age 2 a) That the proposed amendment would not have significant :m.pacta on the envirorunent nor the au rround ing properties; and bl That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Pian. 4. This Commiaeion hereby finds and certifies that the pro; ect has teen ceviewetl and cons idexad in compliance with the California Env iconment al Quality Act of 19]0 and, fort her, this Commieaion hereby recommends to the City coo ne it that a Negat ivs Declaration ba issued. 5. Eased upon the findings nntl concluaicne set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby revolves ae fol LOwe: a) The Planning Commiae ion hereby recommends that the City Council apprcve and atlopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 91-02 per the attached ord inanee. 6. Tha Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEHEER 1991. PLANNING COHMj~SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Seerstary of the Planning Comniasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do haraby cart ify Chat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commieeion of the City of Ra neho Cucamonga, at a regular mast ing of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COHNISSIONERSS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMI3SIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ,3Sg AES OL UTION NO. J1 -17o A AEEOLtlTZON OF THE PLAf(N ING COMHS55 ZON OF THE CZTY OF RAI:CHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORNSA, A£COMMENDINC APPROVAL OF VS CTORSA PLANNED CDMHUN ITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMEtiD ING '/ARIOUS DEVELOPHENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RES ZDENTIAL DISTR TOTS, AND MAX ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT iHEAEOF. A. ReClt al s. li) The CLey of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for victoria P18nned Community Amendment 91-02 as deocri.Ced in the title of Chas Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Planned Common ity Amendment request ie refereed to aB "the application." (i1~ On April 26, and continued to Nay 8, June 12, July 10, Au qu st lA, Au guar 32, and Septembor 11, 1991, tho Planning Commission of the CLty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted tluly noticed public hearinga on the application. on September il, 1991, the commies ion concluded said hearing. (iii) All legal prerequ isitea to the adoption of thin Reaolut LOn have accurretl. B. Pasolut ion. NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and rasa lved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the faces set feeth in the Recitals, Parc A, of this Resolution ors [rue and correct. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-ref erencatl public hoaringo on April 2d, May 8, June 12, July 10, Auquet 14, and September 11, 1991, including written and oral ac off reports. together with public [eat Lmorty, this Commission hereby epee iE waLLy finds as follcwe: a! That the Amendment will Provide for development of a comprehensively planned urbnn community within the Diate ict that is supsux to development of hezwies allowable under alt ornate rogulationa; antl b) That the Amendment will provide for development wit h:n ae Oistr iCt in a manner conaisCant with eha Gene rnl Plan and with re;ateC develcpment and growth management polLc iee of eha City. 3. Based upon the auba[antiel •vldenco presented Co this Comm •sa:=~~ du rng the above-referenced public hearinga and upon the epeeif is finds-qs :. facts sec forth :n paragraphs 1 and 3 above, this commiee ion hereby fends art concludes a9 Eellowe: 3 sYt P1ANH :;m corya s:o:~ RE SOCaTI w; ::o. ..-.. VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO C;;CA.MO`:GA September 11, 199: Page 2 a) That the proposed amendment would r.ct have sign if kart i¢pacts on the envrm nment nor the surrounding properties; and b) Than ehe proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Comm iseion hereby Binds and ce rtiEiea that the project has beep reviewed and considered in compliance with the caliEOrnia Environmental Quality Act of 19]D and, further, thi• Commisaion hereby recommends to the city Council thac a Negative Declaration bs issued. 5. Based upon the findings and cone lueions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 6 above, this Comm ise ion hereby resolves as Eollows: a) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City council approve arttl adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment 91-02 per the attached ordinance. 6. The See rotary to this Commission shall cect ify to the adapt ion of Chie Rees lution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. PLANNING COMM y~SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA [y i~Cn lei, ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the CLty of Ranchc Cucamonga, do hereby cart ify that the toregoing Re eo lut ion was duly and cegu lady introduced, pa usd, and adapted by the Planning Commisaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of iha Planning Commission held on the 11th day of Beptsmbsr 1991, by ehe following vats-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCN ER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE A85 @!T: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 3 ~d ORDINANCE NO. (-Y 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GU ZDELINES FOA MVLTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS LN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On April 24 and continued to May e, June 12, July 10, and August 16, August 22, and September 11, 1991, the Planning Coam isaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing on September 11, 1991, the Planning Commission adapted Resolution No. 91-134, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment No. 91-02. (ii) On September 11, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. fiii) AL1 Legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facia set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has Deen reviewed and considered in comp lience with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Aancho Cucamonga City Councll finds as follows: a) The proposed Amendment would not have si gniEicant adverse impacts on the environment nor the au rroundinq properties; and h) The proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Y lan. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Development Code Amendment 91-02 as follows: 3~~ CZTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. OCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 a) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Tab 1e 17.OH.040H - Basic Development Standards, and Table 17.08.040( - Optional Development Standards, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. b) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17.OB.060G - Recreation Area/Facility, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. c) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17.08.0401( - Visitor Parking, attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this reference. d) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section 17. 0H.060E, and Table 17. 0H.060(E) - Building Separa tione Standards, attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by this reference, and all subsequent sections renumbered accordingly. e) Tit Le 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 17.08.0 dOR - Amenities, attached hereto as Exhibit "F" and incorporated herein by this reference. F) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17. O8. OSOP 1d(3) - Absolute Policies, to read ae follows: An entire site plan shall be oriented so that the activities and functi one are all geed hierarchically - placing those least compatible furthest from the common boundary between land ua ea and those most compatible near that boundary (i.e., single story adjacent to single story). g) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17.08.090 - Design Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit '•G" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5: The provisions of this Ordinance shall not apply to those residential subdSvis ions wherein a Tentative Map and Desl qn Aeview has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. 3bz CITY COUNCIL OAD INANCE N0. DCA 91 X02 - CITY OF RAN CNO CU CAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 3 Section 6: The City Cletk shall certify to the adoption of this Ozdinance ane shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily sulletin, a neaepaper of genez al circa lation published in the City of Ontazio, California, and circulated in the City of Aancho Cucamonga, California. 3~3 TABLE 17.08.010 - B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (WR: NOT REWIRED) VL L LM M MN N LOT AREA: 22500 8000 8000 3AC 3AC 3AC MINIMUM NET ACERAGE (y (L) (L) MINIMUM NET 20000 7200 5000 3AC 3AC 3AC NUMBER OF DWELLING UNI (A) (PERMITTED PER ACRE) UP T02 UP TOI UP T08 UP TO 11 UP TO t9 UP T027 YWIYU D IN6 UNR : (n SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1,000 SOFT. REGARDLESS OFDISTRICT DETACHED DWELLING MUL IPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS (J) EFFICIENCY/STUDIO 550 SOFT. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT ONE BEDROOM 850 SOFT. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT TWO B D OOM 800 . REGA LESS O DIS RIOT R 950 I L TDIY NSIONS MINIMUM WIDTH (®REWIRED 90 AVG. 65 AVG. 50 AVG. WR WR WR FRONT SETBACK) VARY N- 10 VARY N- S VARY N- S MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 100 70 50 WR WR WR MINIMUM 1 100 W MINIMUM FRONTAGE 50 !0 30 100 100 100 (® FRONT PROPERTY LINE) MINIMUM lAG LOT ON A 30 20 20 50 50 50 (® FRONT PROPERTY LINE) CKS: ( ) FRONT YARD (C,E) 42 AVG. 37 AVG. 32 AVG. 37 AVQ WR W R VARVN•5 VARVN•5 VARVN3 VARY.l3 z z zz 7 w w INTERIOR SID YARD 10/15 &10 5110 10 WR WR (D) YARD 30 20 15 f0 W WR D AT INTERIO SITEBWNDA V 30l5 2015 15/5 1515 1515 tS5 (DWELLING UNITlACCESSORY (0) (D) IDI BLDG. EXHIBIT A 1 " TABLE 17.p8.01W - B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CoMinusd) (NOi a REQUIRED) VL L LY Y MM N RESIDENML UILDINO SEPARATIONS WR N/R EWIRED PER SECTION 17.Oe.0I0-E NEIGNi LIYRATIONS 35 35 35 35 (~ 40 (~ 55 (~ LOT COVERAGE (AAAJOMUM %) 25% AO% 50% 50% 50% 509: OPEN SPACE REWIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (GROUND FLOORNPPER STORV UNfI) 2,000/ 1,000/ 300/150 725/150 150/100 150/100 COMMON OPEN SPACE (A) (MINIMUM%) WR WR WR 30% 30% 3076 USABLE OPEN SPACE ( ) (PRIVATE AND COMMON) 35% 5096 ~0% 35% 35% 35% RECREATNON AREAIFACI WR WR REWIRED PER SECTION I7.OSOA6H LANOSCAPINQ (G) ( ) ( ) REWIRED PER SECTION I7.OB.OEOii AMENRIES WR WR N/R OUIRED PER SECTION 17.O6.OA0-R A EACIWEDlAl10 NECE86ARV FOR BECOIDARYBTRFfTE AHDARTBIINA AND NNAIBDE ANF+1B 611ALl BE OEPENOMIT ON THE 9LOPFA'.WACRVFACTAI OONTAIfDN 6EOTION I>.MDD-6 . fl AS YEA6LREDFRgITNE LITMATE CORE iACE ON PUaCA1D PRIVATE STIIEEi61EFEN TOTABU: t7.BE.ND-0 F011AOOfTMMML SETBACK C. VARMEIE FIID/1T YARO6ALLONFD PUR61MNf TO6ECiDNt)ga810-N D. ADO TEN ItOIfFEf FADA1CEM TO VL,LOR IN ONTRIOf . E lF9L OIAN EMiMffN PEI FEET iflW MCMDF EDEWIYJ( RE011FE6 AIROIIATE:OARAOi OOOR OPf1E116. F. lNR ONE111 FTORY Nrt1E11 ONE NIPEII[OryOR FEET DF VLOR LORTRILT iOfl WLTINE iAYIY ONEILIKit G PEREIEIER lAMO6CAPN0 AID N1FAIp1611~T TIBF . N. A 6ENiE FAMLYDE'fAG® pNHJfIDLFd6TMNdE 1110116AM(1pE0I60UAIE FFEi WY6£ AUrtOR~D VAEN AOEYELDPMFM EDMBIT6 ENOVATIVE OUAIrtEb N TRACT . PLOP MIOAgCINTECIUIML OE61U/IMRdD117NE APPROVAL OF A OONOIIIOIAI UBE PERMR . l 9ENI011 CR~NB PRDJE(:fe ARE EYBif®F110Y iFIM IEW/Elillf . J. TOA66UETN1IT EIWJEA 111116 ARE MOT CONCENIMIEO N ANV OE NEA 011 PRDleCf.7NE Fd10RIq PER[81TAOE IIIMTATEMFE OF iNE TOTAI MalFA tKUFIF NAILAPRY:IBIPDI PERCEM FOA EFF1CdICY,61UOl0AMOlMEOY FNE (Eq PFACEM FOR 01E BEDROpY OR LE' TOTIINIYFIYF (EEIP01CBIf C01E11E0 .91.6ECT TO ACOIDRpIW-IpE pBtlIR .71E N/JNNOCgIMISIIXI MAY AIRNpI@ AOTEA7ER M71DOT ERCBICYORDNE DI6EOro0Y LNII6YAFN A OEVFLOPIIENf EIOIMI6 NIq/ATNE OEBION dAWTEb AID A AHVVICE MOIOF Ullf NgA AND1YPE6 . K NIN180E AIFM.NED1Rt 6NALL 6ElYRFDTOTNET'(EEI IFFY 116 EPECF~NBECilp11T11.p7p-0.1 . L ON EXI6TNOlOTSaF IECOIO, PARCB6lE6F7MAN TIFfE (>f ACPE6 AND lEeb 7NAN THE IEOI/IFD 11E1EAFA FRONTAOf MAY pE.Y BE OEVEIOPEOAT TNF lDMFBf EIO OF 11F PERMTTEOOEAtl1RYRNDE . EXHIBIT AR" TABLE 17.0&OW - C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (WR: T IR ) L MN H (GROSSI 5AC SAC SAC 5AC SAG A (MINIMUM NET AVERAGE) REWIRED (q REQUIRED SAC 5AC (A) (PERMITTED PER ACRE) UP TO! UP 10B UP TO /s UPT024 UPT030 I I :1 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1.000 SQ.FT. (G) REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT DETACHED DWELLING UL F V O LINOS ( ) EFFICIENCY/S7U010 WR 55080.FT. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT ON R WR 650 G11 D RIC TWOS DROOM 80D 1 IC T11 O MO E R S W 950 GA I5T IC LO DIM MINIMUM WIDTH (®REQUIRED VARMTig1 Q) VARIATION WR WR FRONT SETBACK) REWIRED REQUIRED MNI IN W W SINGLE fAMILV REVISIONS :1 1 LOCAL 9TAEET 12 AVG. 11) 12 AVG. 42 AVG. a7 AVG. VARV./•5 VARV~/-S VARY/-S VARVN-5 NA N AY 02 AVG. 15 AV 5 VARY/-6 VARYN•5 (E) (E) (E) (E) CO NE SI VA D 17 10 5 W WR !EI IE) IE) IN RIOR SI E V 910 (R t W (H) (D,YQ A IN 1 R S NOA 295 195 20/S 2015 015 (DWELLING UNIT(ACCESSORV (D) (D) (D) BLDG. EXHIBIT B 1 " TABLE 17.08.010 - C OPTIONAL DEVELOPIYiENi STANDARDS (Contlnued) (N/R:Not RpWnE) L LN M MN H RESIDENML BUILDING SEPARATIONS FRONT TO FRONT 25 25 REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-E OTHER 10 10 REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040•E HEIUHT LIMITATIONS 35 35 35 40 55 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (GROUND FLOORNPPER STORY UNfn 7,000/WR 3001750 225'750 1501100 1501700 COMMON OPEN SPACE (A) (MINIMUM%) S% 70% 35% 35% 35% USABLE OPEN SPACE (A) (PRIVATE AND COMMON) 60% 0.5% 4096 40% 40% RECREATION AREA/FACILITY WR REQUIRED P R SECTION 17.08.040-H LANDSCAPING (F1 REQUIRED PER SEC N7N 17.08.040-G FROM YARD LANDSCAPING REQUIR D PER S ION 17.08.040-F ENERGY CONSERVATION WR REQUIRED PE SECTION 17.08.040-I AMENRIES N/R WR C-0UIR D P R SECTION 17.08.040-R A EYCUANDIANO NECE38IAV FOp 9ECCIOARY STREETS AND MTFRNIB AMO N NElBOE NIFA89NALL ~ pEPENDNIT ON TIE 9LOPECAPACRY FACTp1 F-0NTAEEp N dECT1JN t].N 4E8410~ B . 8 AS LEAAWEO FROM iNE UI.TENTE CI.NB FILE M P191A: ANO PRNATE STRFFT311EFiH1 TOTABLE 1/.]I.OSdO ~ D FOR AOORTIONAI SETBACK NFOWATgN. C. UYR 01E OI STORY NT11M OME N1QE0 RON fEETOF VL OR L pISTRCT FOR WITEAE FWAYONHlM08 . D. AODTEN Ito) FEET F N]YCEN] i0 VL l OR W 0li8gT E 1E91 iNAN fgllfEEN OSI FEET FRCP BICRGi SpEWAIX NRNN fA1100YNW . TOWNgUBE 011 APARTYEM 1EOVNES AYT0IWTK GYITdE 00011 OPUF.RS. OARAQ 8ETfl1Olt b iBl R01 FEET MNMM f SEIE ENTRY LiA1NgE ARE VSED PI1NS11AIfT t0 SECTION t ] 01.010 ~ Y WRNN SNGIE FAYIY DETAOE07EW DEFKFEO DFY$OPMEM, F. PERSETER UA08GEPMOAlO NREIIOR RiRFT TIEES . G A BNOIE FAMI.Y OE]ACNEOOYELLM IESB 1TYN NNE MNNED(OpI3WAllE fEETYILL RFWNf 11E APPROVALOF A COIORgNAt UBE PERYR fTS18UINT TOeECTgN 1 ]0180 . N 3J0 UOT UE DYYEl11Ki9 PEFWRIED PIEISUAfIf T09EOTgN t T.OINO. P . L REFER i0 T.1gEt].M.OIp~O.I AMO TABlF 1)80.010-C.3. J. SENIOR CRI]FNS PROJECTS Mf E7IEMYIEO F1101A 1NR REIXINWFM . K i0 Ae6U1E iINT BYALLER URS NE NOT CONOENiM1E0 N ANY 01E AREAdi PRGECf, THE iOtLOWNTI PFACEMAGE INTTATgN40f t1E TOTAI NUtASEROF IMR$ 91Y11. APPIY: TEN 1101 PERCENT FQi EFFICENCY9T1Aq ANp iNNTY FIVE p61 PFACEM FOR ONE BEOROOY OR lF TOTNg1Y FIVE psl PFACEM OdB1E0 9UYIEC7 TO ACONDRgNAI USE PFRMTT .TIE PIANNNG COMYBSgN W Y AUT1~lRYE A GREATER MTga EFFgFNCY DRONE Itl SNXIOpA WT8 VAIEN A OEYEIOPYEM EIINERS NNOVATIVE DESIGN dlAllfEB ANO A BAINICE YUI OF UNR SIIFS AND TWEE l N N113[E AREAS . HEgIRS 6NALL EE WRFD TO iNRTY FJ01 FEET A8 SPECFEO N SEOTgN 1111.Oi8 • D.t EXHIBIT B3." Secvon 17.08.040 - G a.,. .aim ~~ .*a~Fa utv. Where required m Table 17.08,040 - C . developer shah provide mreational amemtles in conJunetion with common open space as fouows 1. Development consisting of 30 units or Iqa shall provide three of [he foilowtng recrcauonal amemies (a) forge open lawn area .one of the dimension shall be a minimum of 50 fleet . (bl Enclosed tot lo[ with multiple play equipment. 1 c 1 Spa or pool . Idl BBQ facilty equipped with gall , picric txnchp ,etc . 2. Development consUting of 31 umb to 100 umb shall yrovlde another set of recreational ameni[iea as dexnbed m Sectfon 17.08.040 - GI or cquNalent , as approved by the Planning CommWlon . 3. Development consbttng of 101 amts to 200 amts shah Drwfde live of the following recreational amenities or equNalent as approved by the Planning CotnvcWtan (a) large open lawn .one of the dlmenamn aha8 bt a minimum of 100 feet. Ibl Multiple enclosed tot Iota with mulnple play equlpment.The tot lots shall M comemently located throughout the site. TThhe number of tot lob and their location shall be aubJect to Planning Commbafon chew and aDPrwaL (c 1 Pool and spa . Id) Community multf•purpox room equipped with Idtchen. defined areas for aaawes. exercises ,etc. (el BBQ facflinea egwppcd with multiple galls. picnic benches, etc. The BBQ facWtln sha11 be conveniently located thmuahout the site. The number of BBQ facdltfes and their location shall be subfect to Planning Cmm.nia.~on review and appproval. Ifl Court fxWtles l e.g. tennis. volleyball, basketball. etc.l. (g) ,togging/walltlng tmis with exercise ataions. 4. For each 100 umb above the Brat 200 umb, another set of recreaional amenities as dexnbed m 5ecuon 17.08.040 - G3 shall be pmvtded. 5. Other recreational amemies riot ILtted above rmy be considered aubJect to Planning Co®lsalon review and approval. 6. Related recreatbrial xtINt1W rirpy be grouped together and located at any om ales of the common open apace. 7. Dbpcnai of recreatonal fxlhies througho~~ the alto sha8 be required for development with multiple recteaionagfxWtlp, 8. All recreation areas or taciitiea requtred by thb section shall be matntairted by pnvate homeowner's aasociatton property owner or private aaaessment mstrtcb. EXHIBIT C Section 17.08.040 - K. K Visitor )?a[k(pQ. For protects with ptfva[e streets or driveways . Witor parking required by Sector 17.12.040 shall be prahded N o6•street visitor parking bays wlthJn 150 feet of all dweWng umts . Visl[oc parking shall be clearly dey Bated through pro r e to the satlsfactlon of the City Planner. Slgnagc tray Include , but b no[ ted to: pavement [narking . ftee standing sign esJgnating the stalls as vLMtor parking ,and directory slgtts guidktg vL4ltoro to the vlattor parking area. EXHIBIT D " Sec[lan 17.08.040 - E E B ~ddt~¢y ~e~araUO~s Where requtred In Table V.08.040 - B and C .this section xts forth minimum requirements (or 6ullding separation and setback standards. TABLE 17.08.040 - E BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK STANDARDS DIST ICTS BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK (A) M (C) /AFT (C) H (C) (m lest ) BUILDING TO BUILDING IB) 1. FRONT 70 FRONT a. No patio or recessed pate 30 30 30 b. Between patio Isncsiwaq has Man 5 M. in MqM IF) - wdMUtsidewaklFl tD 70 10 - wtlh sdewalk IF) 15 15 15 c. Between pats Isnce'wali ngra then 5 h. in height 20 20 20 d. Between Oakonhs above palb lencsrwall more than 5 h. in hegM 20 20 20 e. BMween a PatR lencerwall and a bnWirq waq 20 20 20 I. Wdh common pats lencerwaq 30 30 30 2. OTHER 15 1s is BUILDING TO ONE~STORY DETACHED GARAGBCARPOR70R OTHER ACCESSORY 15 15 15 STRUC7URES(E) BUILDING TO CURB (E) 15(0) 15 (D) 15 (D) BUILDING TO CURB AT PROJECT ENTRY (patio wall 20 20 25 or fence shall nd prgeq eeo Ole salllack area) TAI BUILDING SHALL MEAN DWELLING UNITS. IBI BUILDING SEPAM710N STANDARDS FOR BUILDING 7V BUILDING St1ALL BE FOR TWO-STORY DEVELOPMENT ONLY. ICI ADD TEN FEET FOR EACH FLOOR/STORY ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR/STORY FOR THREE OR MORE STORY BUILDINGS. (DI AllD FIVE FEET F'OR EACH FLOOR/STORY ABOVE THE SECOND E1.OOR/STORY UP TO A M.WMUM OF'IWENiI'-FNE FEET' FOR THREE OR MORE S'tVRY BUILDINGS . LEI PATIO WALL/FENCE AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY MAY PRQIECT INTO THE SE-[HACK AREA PROVIDED A MINIMUM 10 FOOT NtEA SHALL BE MAINTNNED FREE AND CI.FaR FOR LANDSCAPING. IFI BETWEEN BALCONIES ADD 5 FEEf , EXHIBIT E 1 " ~T~v ,Ano al~'/s (~ rfNJs)~rngr~/,~Ynv ~n~K - ~c~s EXHIBIT Ez" nv ~bio ae ,?ece¢reo Pnr~,~ittv!' dy7wRev,~~ klkss~~''4t1.u[ge~ - ~' ~COViexs . zo ' !3~'~r 84taxu~s - .roo s' ^M 'v. V:; ~t~ ,. CD EXHIBIT E3" ~.,~.~ ~ EXHIBIT E~" .~ta~sv Z-~it~eyG~iitara f~~yTyy~v~t^l~IGG ~aew di°cbsiy GF.+ww; Nl~cs Section 17.08.040 - R R Amenirte_.To enhance quality oC Ilfe Cor multl-(amdy development, additional amenities shall lx rcqulred as Collows: 1. Storage space. Each unit shall he provided with a minMUm of l25 cable Ceet oC exteror lockable storage space. The stor~tte space shall be located outside of [he dwelling at grade or Boor level and easily accessl6le by [he residents. The design of the exterior storage space shall be architecturally Integrated and/or compatlble [o the dwellinga. The individual storage space amts can tx located within the fully enclosed garages destgrtated for that dwelling amt. 2. laundry Cac18ty. Each amt shall be pravtded with ahook- up for washing machine and clothes dryer in the interior of the dweilfna ; or ,common laundry facWties shall be provided and be equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate oC one washing machine and clothes dryer per flue units. Common laundry facdities should be comemently located for all residents within the complex. Common laundry faclbtles can be within freestanding bulldtngs ,attached to dwelbng onus or within the recreation room. The design of the common laundry ac8ttles shall be amhltecturally compatible to [he dwellings, EXHIBIT ~~ F „ Sectlon 17.08.090 General Design Guidelines A, Intent The intent of the guidelines is to assist the developer in uMersta nding and comp ying with the City's sMndards for Duflding and site design. The guidelines are based upon com munity design goals as ezpressed 1n the General Plan, and encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property along with associated fac111tles, wch as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. The guidelines establish a Mgh standard for design quality but are flezibie enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. 3. AppllcabDTty. The provisions of LMs settlon shall apply m all development within a-ii-"re~flal dhtricts, unless otherwise speci}1ed hen!in. Any additlon, remodeling, relocatlon ar constrvctlon requiring a buDding permit within any residentlal district suq~ect to DevelopmenVDesign Review pursuant to Chapter 17.06 shall adhere t4 these guidelines where applicable. Site Plan Design 1. Existlng S1te Conditions. Natural features should De used to an advantage as e gn a eme we as, mature vegetation, tandforms, drainage courses, grading, rack outcroppings and views. Conversely, undesirable site features can be minimized through proper site punning and buflding orlentatlon. 2. Bmldinyy Drlentatlon, placement of the buiidings shall be done in a manner compaii67c wifFsurrounQing existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from Streets and ayaCent properties should relate to the stale of the proposed bmlMn9. Larger buildings require more setback area for a balance EXHIBIT G " Sec'ioa : .,;d.:3~.. of scale and compatibility with aQjacent uses. Buildings should be oriented along a north-south axis, as much as possible, ro encourage energy conservatton. For multi-family developmerrt, attached drelNngs should be Prodded rith reNef and a sense of variety. TMs Could be acMeved by sta99erlm9 the units The placement of buDdings should relate tq one another and create a variety of der orierttatlon for increased interest and openness TMs could be acMeved Dy skering or angling the buildings. Buildings should be cluster around common facilities Access/Circulatton. The access and circulatton should be designed to provide a sa a an a cent system for vehtdes and pedesb-lans. Points of access shall comply with aty access regulations and shall not conflict with other planned or exBttng access poirrts. Two pot nts of access shall be prodded for all but the smallest residential developments The circulation system should be designed to reduce conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adlacerK properttes, co mbtne access where possible, and prodde adequate maneuvering areas Curvilinear streets are encouraged whenever possible. Vehicular and pedestrian traffk shall be separated, to the extent possible, Nrough the use of a continuous system of public and private sidewalks. 4. Parkin Areas. barking areas should be designed to minimize dsual scup ono a overall protect design. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combinations of mounding,landscaping,low profile walls and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also mini mite auto noise, glare, and increases in ambient air temperature, TMs can be accomplished through sound walls, ureeriing with fences or hedges, trees, and separation of parking spaces and driveways from residences (a) Site Design: Openness, reduced swcture mass and convenience of use should be charactenstics of parking area design asimplementetl by the folldring: o Parking areas (open and covered) shall be designed to prodde parking spaces conveniently located to the units they are intended m serve. o Long, unbroken lines of opposing garages/carports on each side of a drive able should be avoided. This type of design results to a "constricted alley" atmosphere. o Free standing garages/car9orts should be Located not m disrupt the primary dew of resldeMlal structures. o Yiews to landscaped areas should be maintained at the ends of drive aisles Vistas should not be obscured by facing garages or carports. o Dlarrter breaks and special paving should be lnciuded along the parking aisles. These features add interesting patterns to the driveway/parkway area rhythm. Section 17.08.J90 o In order w open up more of the parking area to adjacent landscaped areas and reduce the "alley" effect along the drive aisle, offset facing garages/carports are encouraged on lengthy drive aisles. (b) Architecwre: Garaye and carport sWcwres should exMbit designs which are compattbl e, supportive and fully Integra red into Che overall arc hitecwral theme as imple merrt2d through The following provisions: Long sWcwres present dtfflculttes in keeping proportions appropriate with the original design intent on the main strvcwres, and therefore, the garage/carport swcwres should be limited W g-12 Cars. Recogrdze garage doors as an element of design rhythm and use to create varying patterns. Extensive use of single width garage doors should be avoided. The perception of increased density can result from a parking area with large numbers of garage doors. An overly repetttious pattern of doors can be monotonous and should be avoided. o "Flimsy", "stick-like" carport deslgm wMCh portray an add- on, non-permanent perception are otdeslreDlecharactaristics of a parking area. Substantial design elements should be integrated into the structure to convey a more permanent concept for the carports o WItMn muI11pN spaea gerega nrueturn, each car epees ahnl W wpantad with a solid well asapt wMn two or men apecaa are datlgnated to a aingla dwelling unit. For tingle yaraga unite, the Inalda dlmMtldtt atoll lra Inenewd to a minimum of Un tan by tvraMy tact for eommlanp of usa. 5. Landscapln Open Space. Landscaping and open spaces Host De designed as an n gra pa o prgfect design and enhance the bull ding design, enhance public views and spaces and provide Duffers and transitions where needed, with emphasis on complementing grading and softening slope banks. Landscaping must provide for solar access and shade bu facilitate energy conservation. Open space should be provided 1n conee110ebed areas large enough b provide opporptnitles for active uses by g-a9= 6. Fencin /ScreeMn . fences and walls are discouraged unless needed for a spec c screen ng or safety puryose. Nhero they are needed, color, material and varlatdon of the vertical and horizonWl planes are needed to blend with the site and building design. The use of any fencing or walls should be consistent with the overall design theme. Sec-~^ . .,d.:3L 7. Lighting. Adequate on-site Lighting should De provided [o ensure a safe en ronment wM1e at the same time not cause areas of intense light ar glare. Fixtures and poles shall be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building design character. 8. Utilities and Ancillary Equipment On-site utilities and equlpmerK shall be oca rn inconspicuous areas, away from puolic view. Nhere they are located in public Wew, they shall be screened with a combination of material Chat best suits the overall design theme. 9. Grading. Development should relate to the natural surroundings and minimize grj~g by following the natural contours as much as possible. Graded slopes should be rounded and contoured to blend with the existing terrain. Spli4 level pads, built-up foundations, stepped footings, etc., can be used in areas of moderate Lo steep gradient Above all, greding shall De designed to complement the proiect's orientation, scale, height, design and tronsftlons with surrounding areas. 10. F1re Safety. Development should be designed fn accordance with Fire stfT"6i-ci-regWremerds for two points of safe and ready access. Areas designated as Mgh fire hazard areas should miMmize fuel buildup around residences Mrough greenbelts or cultivated fuel breaks 11. Transition of Density. The site plan should consider compatlDtNty with sunroun n g n~Fbe g oi~od Mrough proWding proper Trnsiton of density, particularly on infill sites a47acent to lower densities. Comparable densities, open space buffer zones, increased setbacks and architectural compatibility are encouraged along common boundaries to provde proper trorMtton of density. Clustering units can provide large open space areas as a Duffer. 12. Street Deli n. Vary street pattern m reduce streetscape monotony. urn nears ets, cul-de-sacs, front yard landscaping, and single-loaded streets are encouraged to provide streetscape variety and Wsua1 interest. particularly in the Low-Medium District 13. House Plotting. Clustering houses around common space, zero lot line, reverse p E nt~g, angTing house to the street, and side entry garages may be permitted if they Drovide streetscape variety and Wsuai interest, particularly in the Low-Medium District Budding Design Des1 n Theme. ~ recogrdzable design theme shall be estabitshed which is comps e w surrounding planned or existing developments and should De based upon prominent design features Tn the Immediate area (e.g., trees, landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle variations are encouraged which provide Wsual interest but do not create abrupt Changes causing discord in Me overall character of the im medtak nelghDortrood, tt is not intended Mat one style of arcMtecture should De dominant but Mat tndivtdual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmoMous com munity appearance. architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material and roof line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another end have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, end awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. In particular, Low-:17edium density and mWti-family residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation oP surface treatment end architectural details. The architectural concept should also complement the grading and topography of the site. 3. Scale. The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide en element of openness and human scale. `Aultiple family product type (i.e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent to lower density single family areas. All attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family developments shell be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, views, end general compatibility. Buildings should empheeire hori¢ontel es well se vertical aPPeersnce. This could be achieved b9 the use of projectlore a recesaiorts of stories, balconies, windows end doom, end chatges in root levels end plane,. ht particular for mWtiple family product type, buildings over three stories shoWd coteider stepping back. 4. ~NateriaLs and Colors. Colors, textures and materiels shall De coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materiels end colors chosen shoWd complement the building character. 5. Si¢ning. Every building shell be designed with a precise concept Cor adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement; sign scale in relationship with building end readability shell be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, materiel and placement. 6. Equipment Screenin¢. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side o[ building, or ground, shell be screened. The method oP screening shell be architecturally compatible in terms of materiel, color, shape, and size. The screening design shell blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On April 2d and continued to May E, June 12, July 10, August 14, August 22, and September 11, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing on September 11, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 91-135, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment No. 91-02. (ii) On September 11, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All Legal prerequisi tea prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. E. ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as fol Lows: Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds Ghat all of the Ea cts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: a) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommended approval of the Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described to the City Council. This City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. b) That this Cononunity Plan text amendment la consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 380 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. TVPCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 c) That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d) That this Community Plan text amendment wi 11 have no signifi cant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. Section 4; The City Council of the City of Rancho Cu cavonga hereby approves Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02 as follows: a) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part IV, Design Guidelines, Subsection "Residential Design Guide lines ," commencing on page IV-35 is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. b) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part IV, Design Guidelines, Subsection "Residential Design Guidelines," commencing on page IV-38 is hereby amended in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. r.) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Community Oeve lopment Standards, subsection "Residential Development Standards," Table V-3, Eullding Setbacks Eor Cluster and Innovative Development (LM and M us ea) is hereby amended, in part, to toad as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. d) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Community Development Standards, subsection "Residential Development Standards for Medium and Medium High Dena ity," commencing on page V-14 and ending on page V-15 is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. e) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Community Development Standards, subsection "Residential Development Standards," Table V-4, Building Setbacks for multi-family development (MN and N uses) is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein 6y this reference. f) The Terra Vista Community Plan tent, Pait V, Community Development Standards, subsection "Real dential Development Standards Eor Xigh Density," commencing on page V-18 is hereby amended, in part, to read ae attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3g~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. TVP CA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CVC AMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 3 Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and she 11 cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Snland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 38 z n~Y n _-Y - L - _v ~j - _ 'J L n _~ ~J C y` U ~ r. _~ U.] n--^ n C U 2 J .' ^J A N Y 1Yr _ 3 n U 1. ~~ r ~ U ~ u y= ~.. n 9 J y ~~ U ^ "awl ..]~~qq ;q lj -..JL~n ^~-j 'C ~' C ~ ;n U> J Y .~.- n C T ? ^J^ 1 a n' l Y T n O J q V~ Y U J J J J A J N 'n r « >. u'J. •~ - U 'S a- Y L j J n C J .U F' i n j .L L qL• U ^ T^ .= u .+' ".n n Y L L n C_ U a .y C_ j b ~ ,Q m r a_ a q C L 'p ~ C 1 2O .'.L n .9 QC L `~ CNO.~a VI~ ]TW'SL _ T a O 7 a ~.- - Y O."a qY CUga JaC _ « Lv T_Ogq Yr...~L "Ln O~~ J> ,Q J ~ _ C_ .n Y U C rp a` Y ^y ... ~n .ay N ^a U L a Oai LLY ` q'~qj ty.~ m" Y J -~] 3 o T~ ^ C ^ 7 U U ~> y N 1 N~~ «~~ O~ ~ OIC 1 V j q ~;~ L a: ~~ ~~~ y U? q L T~ r; n; C L n a f VI 9' j 'J C !1 J ~ Q1 a~ ;Q Y^ 3 y q N N ~N J^ 7 a s T C 2 y N~ J Y J~ n 0 L~ v d ; n u y v ~ C m ~ u C a y a L. in CL.~ L N' H 9 L T',S1 iO a ,'I~ '~ Y Q T c L-« 01 C~ C N 9 JYI 'JC U; ~yYT... .Qa VIN Ca; L ~u as •a T.JIn VIU J ~ C S N q U ]'.. m a Y a= T,_ + Y T 'U' 0 9 Y N g a .;+ C O J' L ,1 L~ C g O L q L L L L a y ~ 0 a a N O~C O a O n O_ C 2i .]..- ~->u.q-;In« F-i LL Ncl F-o aN.nE;L aNac 3 N • • • • • i i O .. ~1( ~ C C I I ~ a s a Y N N t1 v c v N E u ~"^^ v-.r o qy«aJO Y _. .. ~i 'JO~~ ?.O dC V> NOWOL N; NOVUIU 1~L~gC > .~ q ~~ y U T C 9 d >. '~ S O^ J O> ~ q~0_? ~LLIJUE ~° L..L Tr d1L >ryv N J N a y 3 ma ca;,q -a~ q,n d j i 1 ~: m vai ~ A L r u d'> a~~ V T L L ~ ~ O ti -~ y L u u a L b '^ y ~ 3 N T O L .,0, b F a n ~ > C u p 7 a r? j u E w .' d Of q L ,c L~ .v P n_ ~.; ~a,u VCCy._L ,~=peY ]aCCtr i...n m~ ~ F-~a a q'-OOa eYEO$ Loral-L anvL jJ C r q ~~ N A '9 a a? c E m e r Y. C m o C ~ y L -- J C O V y mr'O v `L, L uc q q Y ; UomLa 3 ~'~ uq ~ y v L 7 c 0 ax :_' 8 c a v E 9 - ~^ ~~ ~$ q~ a a o ~8 6 5Y o° d G avi d a m ~ '= n^ y .°1. ~ a ~_ - - _~ L a ~yyyyy m Y n w yy L ~ 3' - n v C 7 a, C L ~ lJ v l 7~ r ~. ~~ s G a O OU a =~ U r0 O` q^ 9~ ~ ~ V y 0> n a G a d ] Y 6 ~ C n ~ _ q L a 3 y ^1.C - _. 'J y~ U a[ L a m C" v Cy ~0 ~m an =co~ v` oEE'oo ~.a Ac,°n~ oy.LY. ~.=; 3_ ~ 'a1 G T> - > o m L J m .a ° m V m= o a> '° ~ N 'n s 3 3 ~ Y ~ CI C y J a C ~~ U q r0 .: a e u uL.. ,OJ ~,j N a a y~ 9 ° v 9 L_ G •• O L O q q n N C S C V L C N ~N q U 'n L 3 9 ~ '_' qn LL> J~7 n n6 C~ 0 ~_a 7~q p'n Q y y ~ O L a C' _~ C L Y n c c `-5 0 .. C C 1. F- u L ;J U LL .. ~> O 1- :. n `~ =h Ci rL U - g L U m m 4 • w f Z Y ~ U J N ... N Z v w ~ a 0 J W 2 W _> s u F n a a > v Z a 2 9 ut w J 07 Y u ~ ~ v Q o L LL [ [ o E ' ~ ~ q ~ L N A m 6 d ` m m O Y1 a m in V1 N N N ~'1 " ? c e c t m ~ t c_ ~ _ _ _ _ C _ ~~ ~~ e r~i h m m m "' e o 7 -a u D o ] O O ~ ~ ~ ~ > J m 1° m N m T a a a a m a M+ N in x N~ ty (~{ ('1 ~ ~ CCC •fi'@'E .t.~ •;a t. •';c ~~ mnm n o ~ o~ iod o C C O O ~ ~~ ~ i A q ~ m o. ~ a " ms A ry r rn N N [ ~ ~ ° " ~ ~ ' ' ` n ~ m m m ~n o ] e ~ ie ' o ~i r1 Z ~ L ~ ~ ~ LL n W a Y E nW Ua [ ~ L ~~ i n ..N N F °' ma ~~? $`ac al ~ ~Q^ O'~ N ~[ O ~ Q ~~i 1L ~ E y A Y N~ q N L ~ V1 U y O 'Eq[Q [ N v Z ~ Qi ~ ~ ~ d L ~ a "b~~ L O a ] ] ~ i ~ U 1% a .a. m D 6 ~ i C~ ~ 1 .o E m~ .c ~ ~ c o; N ~ ~ m i~ '. Q LL ~Q~ U 3 N ~Jn~ a J l l.) a a a a` H E T N m LL Q F- m ~ T a a u a a H ~ - c m v F Q _a' ~N >~ 2> J ~ ! ~ j ~ m O Y T 0 Z J m ~ ~ ~` E ry L U ~ Q I ~ y E m o a ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ `n - ~ m _ i ~ a o c ~ a i o ~n o v E ] 9 F K Ea L • 1 Z i ! L a N m d p , W Q ~ m a O cam m y E y~ J L r E L ~_ W a a a C C L N o Y ? 9 9'O ~ L m'- • m a J N a N a N a CL.N. ~ ~ W m C C C ,°; u C ~ D. v D L ~ d D C p t ~ ,O, a '~ o o o '" E N a > ~ a .~ .v . J ~ rau L ~ a '" "' ~ Z ~ N o 0 0~ b3 a v oD O L '~ ~ a r ~ ~ E ~ m N .°: .°: U Z I a ° ' i L y - c E ~ ~ r a O u L a l a > ! ~ ~ ~ N N L W m v a C qLj a L O D > O ~ ~ L a~ _ v u D F- ' ~ ` t o c a s i c N r U T N O 1 LL _ O _ O _ O q N u ~ ; L L d ~1 C N O. m p ~ O ~~r C L O 'O O ! D ~~ G1 C m ~ .. a y 'L O p _ t N t a N Y ~ v L O v '" v> .L. m W E n n L N v Ct a Vf m L U a w0. y 7 a ~ ~ Y U C O a ~ pf m ~ ,L_, T m ~= y N Q~ ~, ^= O N ; a.0 c c- ~ E c ' E _ mc > ~ w o a v a . Ot ~ ~ N V z r E N_ v ~ N rn v Cfa L O C ~ O T N c .c E ._ W ~ ~ ~ v ~ O L a q? a U ~ c Q c U I = Q¢ s O w°1 of o _ 3 O c ~ I ¢ '. r s n ~~ o- ~> E °c E Q W 7 N T ~ a U1 G1 0J aJ N~~ T T ~ u~E .° °° T ~ ~ i.~L~r= 5 ~ ., Eu t ., u ~+ m m v 8 'o ,. ~ L. fJ N A ar N w'~ E u ~ mU G~°L 7 'L'L ~V>.~n o ~ u y ~~ ~C N 9cc o+P i°° mq> m ~ .+ c E E,? uE =c'a c.~' q c~~o~c i °m a Luc a._w N >. ~ cumd L F a~ 6 ac E €_o° Aov`ov ~~~~-~o~ .v. E 5 No c "? a n.2 c c a o y c a m U ~ ° $ ~ t ¢ m x d A>A LN roy>c u E m 3 0. > ~ °cP ~-°.~uc m°cmEm°c .9~ `o ~ ~~`~qg `~ a y~~ E F° ' ~ C rn °u « i E c C i°n'~5 a N m 5 ° a ~'a W d•,->,9um u °c >'~c~ S ie ` S Lh o N M ~J E q o.=.L. v D y•mm d m ~ ~° a u u u t 9C 1 N _ 9vNyV vL CDy~K y N aj ~~ 'hh NN ~ x~6 1 v E N ° 3 c < ~ n c ~ u y c` c i c °fj~r m h yraNi >. a s-p c v .~ 3 aF 7~ ~~ 9 ~~~ L~ L W•- • ma- ac . L u m m rn5 ~ y ~ d ~ L Etc ' U U N U IO d a m m L m L m ml:~ 3Yi R 0 ry N N ILO ~ N~ w F i~ 'Z V ~ N N N 3 T U • $r E Q ~ ~ to • C TY T~'a >. O1• T m E ..` u_ [EE myyoEm~~ONy~ ~~~ a y C Y N a a~ m N a p C N l9 ~ ~~~ y U > E ~ ~ ~ ry •C ar o `9 m d Or L Farm ~E uar i W mN Q ui~N~~b~~w~,s•, dyV ~aci ° .. Nv CIO w_m°p>.~E ~ "~o~ ao. N ~7 N IuOL~ O~N9wL.dr awY Qal m Y ~ W °0 9LL m Ina ~uL. cm'~~~ppN ~`u 69m N ~ ~ C W N C V Y ~ N al E u°i L •'_ Ny O. a L q N J • U ° C L~ N• a> p • moE$° aL°.N ~'a 9 A~ ~~ ~> >maNm au.. In l°n rvav Lc pa N d~'i •LL d Lyj jR CN r A> C~ `LL TR Na y~"Cm~• a~C9 U'Y • N ;,; q 01 Ia 6 L ~~ U NIO C• y NC aICO YNI ~~~mLH~da• ~~CUCE ~~ • G YE E N M .~ ._ C N y L L L•• C V .~ L n o •- 'N • ac 3~ orQ Na ~ u L,cmN~tao~~ ora~.c N cN •~ m-omcs u..L • E o+a «~ od •'m p~• L•'-°~E"e SmNQ>T cL'9.yy, c~ N d> 9R C U 16- d L ar ~~ °7 a 9' ; y 9'j L c >a 333 ~ $ An 5"_L•^a-onai'uy `m 'v!;~.. ~> 9>. mY LL~7 Uf ORUW~N~Y.°i~°L mL'NN my a 0 N'^ ~ ~ U a y • E d m L m L rn c a .~ m E E ~e E W P O a C d 0 nL 01 L z m e a No ~] o yin d u ~B ~~ r c L g y a~ ~ b N N' _ Y 9CV ~y C•E~ °N>, A ] ttlC O.~a Wp 3r Nd ~ ui B a~ a 'mga~~-c_~c " - G7 U E E ~~ O~ L C d n d L d> t 'x ] N ..nwm~~"o m r =y EN E ..~ ~cyc~a O~vm9 n a N o N n ~ 9 E w ad r c N o ~~ o -° as as z,d, E ?p ca>a«•-_ao,~U d 10 'v ms ~., ctit c=~ao~,y~ L d a y y ~ ; d•- N] o 'o a d •_ ~ U d d ~- c c c n • d m rv ~,u eE c~ c v aL.°_dcc ."o .: Gqd ~m a9 v`a ?v a ~~~ ;n;aaoiOE~~y~ ~a > r a ~ g a a v1¢ ma mo m mc,~ ~'E ~-Od c~~c~auoi vo O~«yONNd NC Qa a JI ~ m G R~ 01d N d NaS L N L N d.~N .'C.do>o~ O> ~U L] d ~ ~ L d .C C N L = N d n •+ l U O i M L ~ ~" ry0lya o a'jrC~ ~~o ,E.v 9 9 Ta>-EA~ac°>td duo -~ ?' .E a n d a d y a o .. c 9 d~ o a ~~ qaL v~E~a m•3N mcd ~E o d >H>dn od a mmt ]]N d ~ >.~ "~ d~v`w ""dduuU y,a, 1- ~~Ecu D ai E S Low 9:: ". a m'do otd~i4_ Nt, c 3 ~ c jr ~ E d y °-' m a c m'c m m v u p.L+ O y L ] a .. -d v a E u n~ ~UO_~'o a~ ~oqy n rEm uuy ; ~ ~ ~ a c o ~ u a"° u i U c " O+ a ENE a " ~~ .. u ._ a" aL Gdpu=~Ci~~~ v =ate NuA ~ ~ a a ~ a my "« a 1 " ]a C1 ~ L d u r " a N N U ju~Om~a aui]~.d. ~ mAL 3«•.~ ~ ~U d .~+ R A a yta ~ _d~m>~ r ~Ca a~R >. ~ j N d L L~ r ;aL n.COONO°d d d~01a d NAa W C ° E 0~ 01 UQ 'N a~ N°" ~ L "- O A i C a ~ a S y J N a C C y Y > Lo63L m7 y L ~,p-m E ..°° m E y? 9 V ]'•~ m '^ t d N y ~ 'o c E u d ~ y _o~v_c ~~.? YE x Na7,C a f3m in U ¢ m m m '" ° L d a~ E a N U n '~~O ~C L._ n.LA~._ ] a9aA d _ d _ r. ~~3 d'°n_a7 "L>° 9 C?; `~~ j !° .0 u a m L ~ '~ ~ j N L'C 9 0 N a .. ~ _ d r L b yJ Z~ E ~ a E 0 w N C S G Z < o > } W J J ~ 0] LL f F J z O ut Y U a m W N U Z_ O J 7 07 1A v L SY ~ C ~ yYD ~ d V1 Y U m ened a u m u C a :~ '~ ~m Y y a L N a C! c O 'O O U T C C O V 6 M .n w m m Z 7 1 C C a 5. ~ a m 0' _' u Of m T a j N i0 R m b YZ ~ ~~~ ' ~~ o b o 00 0 0 E N N q ~ o o e o r . ^ _ Z ~ i ~ ~ C C E~ ~ N ~ ` 6 1 6 d E ~ Nv vv M , ~ •1•• v N Ifl V1 N N 1!1 V N N ~C Nm l Nm OI m ~ L. L . t ~ ~A ~~ ~ ~ w~ N . 3 3 . 3 3 mm m m ~~ ~~ ~~ a as ;~;, o e n Z 9 z 0 0 0 0 ~z ~i ~ q~ A A ^EE ~' M~ N^ ply C ^~~ L ~ e L ~ N - ay ' N N a4iu mm m m ~ ~ ' N N ~ ~ t ~ N m N m o~m ~w. i-K Nip 5~ ~5 N m a ~ ~ ~~ '$"~' o 0 o a 'u o 0 i A ~ .L. S T ~Nu ~ T < T T T L T T ~ ~ O~ m N pi N L l N L J O yi L vi L ~ „ W N - a m ._ ~? L C L ~mL NmL in m - ~ m~ ~ ~e d L~ p L~ O ~ q 0 V q O L yy L Uy L L O q y NL 'J ~ Nr T uuL rT DL 7" T Q ~ 6LO T~' ~ O r u q O U < ~ L u L O ~0 Y O y O L S a L 0 a r T F Y O T T ~ N N U . . O O N~~ O N U O N VN~u 3 N ~ j 3 N O - 3 y~ ~ J W iJN~6Jm ~Jm JJm t ~i lJm ~Jm ^ LL O. H i ~ ~- C •• .. ~O D d N ~ a 9 t L L ° m > ~ a C O E O ° ~ a ~ rn a= ° $ o ° c c pin ~ U .• a U a q 3 C ~ c U a °~ c C~ _~ N a ~ ~ ° o ~ y ° ~ , ~ m ~ m a U a~ A c L 0 q ~ N a ~ - A ~ i y ' n N ° m ~.~. N N y '= m L ~~ o g 5 n N a y m gu`° o t a o ~ m > 9 ~' u A u o E..V ~'S su ~ u ~ y N A : A . O O ° ° C g a N C a 9 ? n y~ R Y~>.• ~ ~, ~ o _ _ a~A m ~ rv1 .N U N n N y °. ~ a' m YY O `o ~~ g a a ° a m N E =.p o~u r~ ` ~ a OI 5 a L ? Y " N > E D7° Q C~ 2 a u~m R° v ~ y E$ ~ E q ~ E ~ .~ n ~ y c c a p 7 y z~=`~~o ~B Y`O" a ~ o; urn ~° a `o . m °° y E ~~ u a ~~o•• _ ° ~ d W ~N w . R U C C yy Y =~~ Y ca aL ~ a n •a `o rEY~ '^ o y ~ E° ~ a ' ^ n ° Eon 7 ~` ~ N ~.C T c a o . _ u 6Q ~~C7 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~- g• • L ( s 7 e ~ 1 .; s ~ q L ` m 7 o W u ~ °I a of ~ o ~r 'tR° EA ° Uv~ m ` .f E 7 m U ° ~ N N L p ~ ay Y V$$ ~ ~ ° `n ~7 e ~"~ m ~ ~ n uC OGV - ~L m u ~ u Y CQ$an Yr y U N ~ ~° O N Q ~ A ~ a U q ~ a y N a N m O E ; y A r O B NU ~ O a O T N m ~ C d° T A wt. ° y 0 111 Y Y 6 F- 9 ~ ~ 01 " q ~ N - N ~ m L a m 1 9° N ~`5 Y ° 9 ' v L c3 r c ~ 3 c` ` ~5 ~ a E u°i ~ 9 s u ~ ~ ~~ 'c a ] m uv ~~auYi ~ Z ~ `o t o r ~ ~ a~ 3 E O U < ~ N( < N v( ]R m e g a 9 s ~n ~o n (O Ol 8 N O U N • Vr C_ N^ A l a - ~ d~ 0- >~ J I N I G~ L V , O~ " L L V .~ w`. r J .~ " `l .~ y y V ` ~ ~ >. '~ Q~ ~l Vi y YI - ~ ~ 'O CI E - > C Y L ~r ~ C._ V j j O 1 m C w '0 3 C L ~ K % ~ O y N _ _ C . S (] E ` C O O O L ~ a O] N C ~ O O v- V y m o O :o~ryCrv N ~.^i. ;rE y c~ ~_ ra ~ 3~ « C N C Y N c~ a y'- 0 0 `° ] C a~ j O..`. O O L a C y C ~ 2U E" c v N c ~ g c ~c c 3 a~ S ~ O~'.CY~CNNiO ~~ a ~ N~'OV ~~ v L~~aa i=u>.'^ '^ N acv ~ aL « ~ O O Yi ~ vp .? v O W L 7 L 3v~~m~ Loaa N N u mv.. y qq ~ '~ NV o c ' 0 " c o E- Ev, Q ~ B ia v ~ ~o . r a m O m m~ n p T > N m ~ V r a `p y rv O - J d a°~'~cq aa`~.o am = m 9 m' ~ `v « w$ c y v « u a~ T v A .. t. 1-aoLV3 rnEa U ~ ' ' mm v - E ~ p =~vc vL. oEo v c3L c a rn N c? ¢ i v ~~; ?'n ~ C a ~ F ~> a E v ~ v ~ E ., n '~ 'X u '~vv ~av ~ ~v rn ¢ EyL _ u 9 D ~ c c ~ u a c Z . O V N > « ~ O~ L L O L ~ in O a L N A _q1 ] 6 N C C a Z .; .N 1~ ~ N ~ O j b v ~ ~ _ U 9 N ~ Y v ~ C_ q 7 d L .. ~N` >i aN ~ U •r N N ` v ¢ L a' i 'Q ma Ol^ ~a ~ .. N n ~; .. o~ a v a ~ c s u m 7 u> uvi v E N T y p N A .. .. C ~ ~ C C t 0 0 9 ~ _ T- '~ C E O 7 N N _ GI u ' q ~ .- JL ~_= 4 U- `• . a ~ ~. N L U L U ~ m~ ~ d .'~. m m l ~ O ~n m ; j > L '9 d3 ~10m 7 N u d L4 ~~ «y «O ~ ' C ~~ N ' U C ' N N O ^ ~ T >. C N - « ... >. ~ N L ! s v ~O. ~' E '^ C o E rn rn v~ N~ a c . q J eau J N a c c ys sv ~ m ~, avoa ~ a ~-a; u a a m m> C'7m ~nS m~E m~ v n c y m ORDINANCE ND. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COVNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA, CAL IFOAN IA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOVS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On April 24 end continued to May 8, June 12, July 10, August 14, August 22, and September 11, 1991, the Planning Coamission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Victoria Planned Community Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing on September 11, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 91-136, thereby recom~ending that the City Council adopt Victoria Planned Community Ivaendment No. 91-02. (ii) On September 11, 1991, the Clty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing pti or to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 9. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council hereby epecif ies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and corr¢ct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies Chat the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds ae follows: a~ That the Planning Coami9lion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner pr ¢sc ri bed by law, recovmen dad approval cf [he Conrnunity Plan text amendment hereinafter described to the City Council. This Clty Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. b) That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 39z CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. VPCA 91-02 - CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 2 c) That this Comnuni ty Plan text amendment is ccnsistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d1 That this Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02 as Eollaws: a) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standarda for Development, subsection "Residential Design Guidelines Medium Density Residential" coamencinq on page 226, is hereby amended, in part, to read ae attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. b) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Requ lotions and Standarda for Development, subsection "Gloater and Innovative Housing Setbacks," commencing on page 225, i9 hereby amended in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. c) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standarda for Development, subsection "Residential Development Standarda Medium High Density Residential," commencing on page 229, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. d) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standards for Development Standards, subsection "Cluster Xous ing Set becks ," commencing on page 231 Ls hereby amended to read ae attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ei The Victoria Community Plen text, Part III, Section I, Rego lotions and Standards for Development, subsection "Residential De ve lopmenG Standarda High Dena ity Residential," commencing on page 232, is hereby amended, in part, to read ae attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. E) The Victoria Community Plan to zt, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standarda for Development, subsection "CLUater Housing Setbacks," commencing on page 233 is hereby amended to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3~3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONGA November 6, 1991 Page 3 Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamon qa, California. 35y RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued 4. Medium Density Residential (" M "Land Use Pian Designation Land designated as Medium Density Rcsldentlal is intended for residential development that ranges Gom 8 to 14 dwetlmg units per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations are applicable for [hest areas: a L'se Permitted: detached or attached resldentlal dwellings no[ exceeding fourteen dwellings per adjusted gross acre, including ,but no[ luni[ed to i. Single family dwellings -attached or detached , including, but not Ikmted to townhouses. triplexes. fourplexes. and condominiums. 2. Cluster housing, 3, Community facWUes, page 241 h Site Development Standards I. Cluster housing. lal Budding site area : 3 acres minimum, (b) Building site ewerage As permitted by required setbacks and pdva[e open space Icl Building setbacks ~ See bullding setback diagrams on the following page for typical setbacks. Idl Building separation The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. (el Bwldktg height : 40 feet maximum. Iq Bufldmq site width and depth : As permttrcd by required se[baclct. Igl Transition of density The site plan should consider compatlbtllty with surrounding neighborhood througgh providing proper transition of density, particularly on utftll sites adJacent to lower densities. Comparable denslttes. open space buffer mnea, increased setbacks and architectural compatlblllty arc encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper transition of density, Clustering of units can provide large open space areas as a buQer. (hl All cluster housing development and multi-family development within [he Planned Community area must comply with the DeslRn Guidelines as outlined In the Residential SecUOn of [fie Rancho Cucamonga Development Cade. 2, Innwatrve single faintly housing. la) Build/ng site area :3,500 sq, R.. minlmum,.4.000 sq. R. average. (bl Butlding site ewerage : As permitted 6y rcquired setbacks and private open space. Ic) Bullding setbacks :See butlding setback diagrams on the following page for typical sethaeks. (d) Budding separation : See Bullding setback diagrams on the (ollowing page for typical setbacks. (el Butldfng height : 3S (eet maximum (q Building site width and depth : As pernt[ted by required setbacks. lgl Private open spatt :300 sq. R, minimum. The above site development standards apply to protects which are deemed solutions wh ho address thue~cnttcaml concerns of neighborhood CommpatlbWty,~densigy transition, and design quality, Innovative protects are charaetenud by an attractwe asphalt/conerchc~garages.tand cars Innovative desitgne*nearcristimdietnige crca)trveaways to crca[e well-designed space. particularly usable yazd space. G i _ .~~ ~ F e r__~ r r N ~ ~G 6~' 'a S 9 ; T e ~ i a ^ ~ ~ =a. I ~ i 6 ~i 1 MYrT } 7 t C /+ C a W 1 ro 3 '~ ~ F a 9 ~ • ~ iS 6 • ~ 3 /1 _~i~t yy f S~ j ~ i }~. ! ! ai P' ~ i ~ m u66~ i a a- ~ '~ ` ; K a~ ~ r r ire ~lc ' "~ 'YR~~ 3 u u °G`' . ' ~ Ecr to y o.'u~~ ~ o +o-`: r y~ ~ I r z~.u~~ r i Z ~ ua<`~ Q F. % C r ~ 3 ~ .t y y C ,~~-, ~~ ~ t ~ i i s ~ yv3y= _ ~ V a ~ _ _ ° r_ i a w ~ ~~9u~ ~~ ,~~at nf~! ~a n~_:= Q( y i c _nvQ_ ills ~ V 3 y ~ ~~~ t~` H~ L~ W ~i » i~ a \l a°'Y_=_' s u q ~ r „V 6 ~~\ u ~;~ c .. ~ _ .. a s i3 •7 to ~ tl J ~y W j G .~ = i < i Z -.~..r RESIDEhT1AL DEVE[.OPMENT STANDARDS (continued 1 5. Medium Htgh Density Residen[al (" MH" land Use Plan Designation 1 tand des1~(~ated as Medlvm H1gh penalty Residential houring is Intended (or residential development that ranges from 14 to 24 dwelling units per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations are applicable (or these areas: a Usc Pernvtted: L Multiple-Camlly dwellings including, but not limited to , apartment protects. condominwm projects. and cooperative apartment protects. 2. Accessory buildings. structures and uses where related and Incidental to a pemdttcd use. 3. Commumry Cacilltlee, page 241 b Stte Development Standazds 1. Budding site area : 3 acres mWmum. 2. Ruddtng selbaclcs :Sec budding setback diagrams on the Collovnng page Cor typical setbacks. 3. Budding separation :The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. 4. Budding height : 40 [eet maximum. c. Transition oC density : The site plan should consider compatibility with surrounding neighborhood through providing proper transition of density , partlcularty on udlll sites adJacent to lower densities . Comparable densities, open space butler zone , increased setbacks and archltcetural compatlbl0ty are encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper tr'ansltfon of density . Clustering oC units can provide large open space areas as a butler. d. A11 cluster housing development and multl•Camily development within the Planned Community area must compty with the Des4(n Guidelines as outlined in the Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. ~. e ..- _ r -~e N h ~ 6?' S 9 ~ t i a~ ~ ~ f i .S ~ ~ ~ i g ~ i ~~;a i ~ ' Ni t~ \~ 8 i s Vii- ~ mu-.r ~ o u ~ jj .C i ~ ~ ax i ~• ~r°o ~~f ~ ~ ° f i i ! ~jm $ c c i8 N R ~ ~R~~ ~ ~ ° cT' .: n i~E<~ t~ _ ' ~ y ii `a7~"° rZ i r a~u~° I ~ ~ ~ ~` ro@ r r rla ~ r~ t e o y ~ ~ II "1 ~~ ~~4 ~ o~~nN ~ ~~ I I C 9^N VT ~~J yl VyV ~^ f~ 1 0 'J ~O ~; N ~ C ~ A y`bC~ Y l6 ~ _ o :C'J-C _~atto -. ~ ~ ~ u~~^ A [~ YAK pp Y 1r ~ ~ ~ ,L a~ a ~ s ~ e~ ~ avi+ Zvi °:, .;. o 3 i = ~ ~ 3 SA J h~ ~ z s ~ ~ ~~ Qi$= ~_- - n '~ ~~ W 3 i3 o s > - z -~-- :i RESIDENTIAL DEVEI.OPMENI STAIVDABDS ~ conUnucd ) 6, High Density Residential (" H" Iand Use Plan Deslgnatlon) Iand designated as Hlgh Density Residential is Intended (of residential development that ranges from 24 to 30 dwelllnq amts per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations arc applicable for Ifiese areas: a Use Penn1[ted: I. Muluple-famfly dwellings including, but not Ilm1[ed to apartment projects, condominium projects, and cooperative apartment projects. 2. Accessary bufidings, structures and uses where related and mcldentat to a pemutted use. 3. Cotmnumty facWtlcs, page 241 b Site Development Standards 1. Budding site area : 3 acres minimum. 2, 8udding site coverage : 60 % 3, Budding setbacks :See building setback diagrams on the Cotlowing page for typical setbacks. 4. Budding separation :The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. 5. Budding height : 50 ket maxunum. c 17ans¢ion of density ~ The site plan should consider compatibWty with surrounding neighborhood through prwtding proptr transition of density . part(cularly on Infdl sites adjacent to lower densities . Comparable densities, open space butter nines , Increased setbacks and archltcetural compatlblllty are encouraged along Common boundaries to provide proper tmnsltlon of density . Clustering of units can provide large open space areas as a buffer. d. All cluster housing development and multafamlly development within the Planned Community area must compty with the Design Guldednes as outlined m the Resldentlal 5eMlon a( the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. sa ~ ~" _ _ _ - _ _~T_ ~. f~- a 1 t a $ i u{~~ ~ ~ NE t~~ ~ 2 _ _ ~ a` a .~ .- i ~'~. ia- a SouE W ~ ~ i. s +1 ,~ f f' i i l E ~ °° S~ I ~ ~~: • E ii~H ~ ~ ~ 3~Oi .. S; ~' ' uumA . ~n~5~.. ~ i i ~ .t ~ ~aLa~ a ~ ! 'i i i o a 6 ~ ~~ ~ a Y a ~ \ ~~ M~ ~~ • N ~ ~ ~ 9 9 W ~ V ~ 9 ~ ~ v T ,.; g ; ~ g a E ~ NL N~~ 'kC' .] uu_c.. 0 ~ o: 6 ~ ~ ~ ,`o] AV9C NZ w a ~~ >5 aar~~o . ~ y 9 Y ~ ~ ~ T u- o G C VM O a ~~ ® ' ~~ p ~: Cu ~L90N U ; 3 u~ T ~ ua o ay ~ L i ~ W i~~ j x ~! >~ ; 10EEn A=c= 3`3 u a ~ ~ p"~Y' _~_a~ a~ a "~ ~ `o9~ri`~~~ ~~ G i ~ ©.7j O Tai WQ `7j~ ~ ~ ~ t W ~ O~"~G?~ _~ J toa W i Q,~ 3 `~ ~ ~ '~ VI N^. ~9 L L y ,'~ a9i '~ z3 wi33~7 s' ~ ~ 'e z1.. ~Jn^ W V -- ('ITS' O1' R.AtiCHi~ CI'CA11d11GA STAFF REPORT . ,-,~ ~`' , ~ DATE: November 6, 1991 ~~ ~' ~~" -~. 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ y3!~~ i Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager -- FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~' BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic En9i neer SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON HILLSIDE ROAD FROM ARCH IBALO AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, 0.0 MPH ON MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE FROM SPRUCE AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 35 MPH ON FREOER ICKSBURG AND CANTSTEL AVENUES ' FROM BANYAN STREET TO WILSON AVENUE. It is recommended that Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Cade be amended to provide fora speed limit of 40 MPH on Hillside Road from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue, 40 MPH on Mountain View Drive from Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue and 35 MPH on Fredericksburg and Canlste7 Avenues from Banyan Street to Wit son Avenue; and making findings thereof. Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code allow cities to set speed limits in accordance with specific engineering surveys in order to more precisely establish the "reasonable and prudent" speed required under basic State speed law. This speed Lhen becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than 5 years old, is also required where radar is used far enforcement. A survey as required above has been conducted on each of these streets. The survey tAVOlved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditiens not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of these surveys are summarized in the attached table. After review of these results, it was found that the safety record of Hillside Road, Mountain View Ori ve, Fredericksburg Avenue and Canistei Avenue were well within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not apparent to drivers. Hillside Road between Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue Ma,ldrity traffic speed 36 to 45 MPH • Prevailing speed of 45 MPH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESTABLISH SPEED LSMIT OF 40 MPH ANO 35 MPH ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 Hillside Road between Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue • Majority traffic speed 36 to 45 MPH • Prevail ing speed of 49 MPH Hillside Road between Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue • Majority traffic speed 39 to 48 MPH • Prevailing speed of 41 MPH Mountain View Drive between Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue • Majority traffic speed 34 to 45 MPH • Prevailing speed of 45 MPH Fredricksburg Avenue between Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive • Majority traffic speed 30 to 39 MPH • Prevailing speed 38 MPH Canis tel Avenue between Banyan Avenue to Antietam Drive • Majority traffic speed 28 to 31 MPH • Prevailing speed 36 MPH These sections of Hillside Road and Mountain View Drive have limited access with few intersecting streets. Thus, the observed prevailing speeds must be the predominant consideration in determining the speed limit. CONCLUSION A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on the street and still provide for effective enforcement. A speed limit such as this Ts set at, in most cases, the first 5 MPH increment below the speed at which 85 percent of the drivers are going. If accident rates are higher than expected, a further 5 MPH reduction from the 85 percent levei accompanied with a higher level of enforcement should reduce the accident rate to within expected levels. The proposed speed limits are expected to be exceeded by 29g to 42t of the drivers observed, however the limits should provide an effective tool for law enforcement due to the circumstances under which they will be in force. Respectfully subpti.~tted, ~~<'~/,'i, r/ Nm. Joe O'Neil U City Engineer WJO:PAR:BMP:~y cc: Dan Glass, Chairman, Public Safety Comnissfon Attachment ~l 0 3 ORDINANCE N0. ~~~ AN ORDS NANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF 7HE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals- TiT-Lal7fornia Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the CT ty of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part 8 of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth 1n Part B, beiow, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ti ), above. 8. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga-City--Co3e to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 - Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council-'resoT'u on an upon a ass o an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed Limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets ar parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Ave. - Banyan St. to north end 50 2. Archibald Ave. - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arrow Rte- -Baker Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 4. Baker Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 35 5. Banyan St. from Beryl St. to London Ave. 35 6. Banyan St. from west City Limits to Beryl St. 40 7. Base Line Rd. - west City limits to Carnelian St. 45 8. Base Line Rd. - Carnelian St. to Hermosa Ave. 40 9. Base Line Rd. -Hermosa Ave- to Spruce Ave. 45 10. Beryl St. - Banyan St. to end 45 (-{ OL{ Name of Street or Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) I1. Beryl St. - 800' N/o Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40 12. Canistel Ave. - Wilson Ave. to Antietam Dr. 35 13. Carnelian St. - Vineyard Ave. to end 45 14. Center Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 40 I5. Church St. from Archibald Ave. to Elm St. 40 16. 8th St. - Grove Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 17. Etiwanda Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Summit Ave. 45 18. Fairmont Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 19 Fredricksbu rg Ave. -Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr- 35. 20. Grove Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 40 21. Haven Ave. - 4th St. to Wilson Ave. 45 22. Hellman Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Loma Or. 35 23. Hellman Ave. - 500' N/o Manzanita Dr. to Valley View 40 24. Hellman Ave. - 6th St. to Foothill Blvd. 45 25. Hermosa Ave. - Base Line Rd. to Wilson Ave. 45 26. Hermosa Ave. - Wilson Ave. to Sun Valley Dr. 40 27. Hermosa Ave. - 8th St. to Base Line Rd. 45 28. Highland Ave. - Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40 29. Highland Ave. -Amethyst St. to Hermosa Ave. 35 30. Highland Ave. - Hermosa Ave. to 800' N/o Haven Ave- 45 31. Hillside Rd. - Ranch Oate to Amethyst St. 35 32. Hillside Rd. - Amethyst St- to Haven Ave. 40 33. Hillside Rd. -Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 35 34. Lemon Ave. - Archibald Rve. to Haven Ave. 40 35. Lemon. Ave. -Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 36. Monza ni to Or. - Hermosa Ave. t0 Haven Ave. 35 37. Mountain View Dr. - Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40 38. 9th St. - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 39. Red Hill County Club Dr. - Foothill Blvd. to Alto Cues to 35 40. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 41- San Bernardino Rd. from `Jineyard Ave. to Archibald Ave. 35 42. Sapphire St. -Banyan St. to end 45 43. Sapphire St. - 19th St. to Lemon Ave. 40 44. 7th St. - Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 45. Spruce Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 46. terra W sta Parkway -Church St. to Bel pine P1. 40 47. Victoria St. -Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35 48. Victoria St. - Eti wa nda Ave. to Rt. 15 40 49. Victoria St. - Haven Ave. to Mendocino P1. 40 50. Victoria park Ln. - Fairmont Way to Base Line Rd. 35 51. Victoria Windrows Loop (north b south) 35 52. Vineyard Ave. - Church St. to Rase Line Pd. 40 53. Vineyard Ave. - 8th St. to Carnelian A.e. 45 54. Vintage Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 55. Whittram Ave. - Etiwanda Ave. to east City limits 40 56. Wilson Ave. Amethyst Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 57. Wilson Ave. - Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canistel Ave. 40 ~~S (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and (tiI The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limf is which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (ifi) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the Drima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving noti to of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. SECTION 2: The CT ty Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance an~sh~l cause the same to be published as required by law. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause ie same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published Inffe y o n ar o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of November 1991. RYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST; enn s ou ayor e ra ams, y er I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 6th day of November 1991, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on Lhe 20th day of November 1991. Executed this 21st day of November 1991, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. e ra ams, y er ~-l D ~ ,, ,, I, ~ ~. :j ,\ _- I, i ~ II!y.~, I --~- ~ I ~ > I iiii i %I I ~{~'~{; _.- _.~ .-~ •~ i ~-~ _ l I I \ - . -,izb _ L_.. .r__ III ~ I ., . u -- I ~'~, JI T 9 _` '~ i ~ ' ~~' '' ~,; Si~`II,`a ~ tjrl~ II tr~~7~, III ~ ~~I 11 I iI!i ~ ~, _ 1 !~ ' <_ ~,t~-o ~~,« 'I~ I ~ I~ 7. i ~~- 1 t_ i~-i I~r~" Ih~ C I i I ~ i i I -~ ~'I(ill d,~ Ala j,;Jlsl ~ ~ I _al ~ ! I~~~ ~ I > ~ ~ !i I I 0.L ~ - I I Il, r f ~ ii if L L~ ~ 1~ J~a~ r ~~~II~ i i~~J ~ ~IIIII '~'1'"I~-JHJ~I~i~i-~,_ - i 1~°, ~.' a~ I _ i 1 ~'L-' Yi~.liJ~~ ~~iT-~~ ~ Jillll IJ~I ~ Il~l+ln {~'~ ~ l i ~S~i ~I_ i~= ~, ~ ~I ! I i '~~U~ ij77a ,, ~ , .,, ~I ,,i tj ~ I I ~~)-~-; I liii,~. --' I i I I ' ,il!IIII I. ~ i ,t ~~~~ !,~ iln ~:+ i Ilij -o ' ` „I~' '~. II ' ,Y ..~~ i - I ~~~r 1ii~ i y~~l +~I<< I ,~ ~', aPal ! '~ ~!sy'i {6i I ~ I I '-L C~JJi.l, l.l-~~~i~ JS J,r_ .. ~ ~ ~ ~P.i j ~ I I 1 r i I I, I 1 I 11 ~ I, ~~~ I b ' ~,.,.I rl~l~ I ~ ~ I`!I jl~llll~ III, ~~ala I~alj,', '' i ~, ~, ~ ~ !-I)' ! ~~a ~' ~J~' ~ I ~ i'a~ ~~,~I;~ i~~il ~ ~ tl ~~~li ~ ~ I ~III,I E :uu :ao ~-W~ Mp 06• ~24N~ X00 ~ZW 6 ~JW tWh O T O f O f •ON ^ Y C iOnWi ~p m ~O > •wu~. V >¢. CK i N N N o W Wes u: ' .< _ ~W Q 0 OWE PLC 1~ O O O O V IQ~ C~K~ N O O p }0 1 PUS ~- Q V ~O ZPV• O O O L p ~P umui O O •VPV~ ~ 1 •6^SV Z Z Z U 6 L V • ¢36~ Vf T Ul f T K F`1N• 1 Q 1 .G ~4 O 1~1 m m W ~OL'O\ 9 w2w~ C O ~'6 W4~ O P N f N V v1~V1~ 6 ~f P J rO~ ~ Z IW N m ::ai f f i W Nb~• m pa ~ •~WW .- w . n o a ines. ao~. ~ z z a N I~1 0 PF• T PO• JW -~ N N u n rc s n N N O K Z f W [ Z S O ' Q ~ O 1 Z W O p T a S O _ ~- ~l e k d s I V W 1 .. LLe W~ :ao .sw .uw :o~• u`¢'n aVu .x u w a ow m¢ ma :'n mu .¢ .~.a xmu .°. :o . a°.¢ a •~ ... m ri °o d a 0 z o: a ww. r m :¢aav ~ r :06 n +ouoi wow. in .~ni m .N7N. N 6 I'YP .PJ ~W. iWi YN ON •00. 1- W ~ 4 ap{V16. 6 C1N. t O S O tJw~ ZW. rv V a o` i sJi z i z ~ `o S N G~ . J • C N ("f 0 ~1 s :r- W : cw r~ . c r s. sa ri R's mu 'cam: y ..a. C~ - o : c o` :i° _ wiv: aw ~ . -o: " ? m e v . ~r gyn. .o m ~ ~a ~ -` i: i s c .. : -~ ~¢. .. s o - _ - 4~~ 4 s u Y t ~4~ ~S~ ~J T~ ^'lt O T9 O 4 ~S? .o v wow: APL L 11 OJ• 6 C~~ 7 ~I~ r C :W• n _ `- ~~~~ --- CITY OE' RANCHO CUCAM©NGA STAFF REPORT DATE November 6, 1991 70 FROM: Mayor and Memhers of the City Council Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Managec S„ w~ SUB1ECl': (~gnsid at' n t R sot t'nns Relat'nri to the Fnrmatlon pt A e ment District R9-t Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attacked resolutions adopting the boundaries oC the proposed Assessment District, declaring tht City's intent to finance the improvements through the issuance of bonds, passing on [he Engineer's Report. and setting the time and place for a public heating. Background: The proposed Assessment District consists of approximately 114.6 acres. The District is described roughly as that propetty bounded on the north by Arrow Route, on the south by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fc railroad Tine, on the cast by a line 7296.5 feet west of Rochester Avenue, and on fhe west by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fc railroad spur line. The District is being formed to pay for capital improvements of genecal benefit that have been constructed. These improvements include the construction of streets, the installation of street lights, the undergrounding of utilities, landscaping, sewer, storm drain, and water tines. The Cirst resolution presented foe your consideration would approve the boundary map nt the proposed District. The second resolution would declare the City's intent to finance the capital improvements of the District through the issuance of bonds, per the procedure outlined in the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913". The final resolution would give preliminary approval to the Engineer's Report for this District and would set the public hearing for this District. It is proposed that the public hearing be set Cor December 18, 1997. The actions being requested arc consistent with the previous direction and resrlutions adopted by the City Council in May t989. Because the attached resolutions arc associated with prior actions of the City Council, adoption of the resolutions is being recommended. {jespcctCully (su~`bmitted, `~. RESOITITTON NO. 91-'(,+~J'~ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANQ10 CDCAMONr~A, CALSFOFII7IA, PAST: r'G u4 1FlE "REPORT" OF THE INGII~IEER, GIVING PRE[.II4INARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR pimr rC HFI~RING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has instituted procealirgs for the installation of certain public works of improvement and appurtenances ruder provisions of the "Municipal ia4rovement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Oode of the State of California, in a special assessment district knavn arc] designated as ASSES3gNT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (hereinafter referral to as the "acecasmem District"); and WHFRFA.S, there has been preparad and filed with the legislative body a "Report" provided for in Sections 10203 and 10204 of the Struts arxi Highways Code of the State of California, aryl this "Report" has been presented for consideration; and WEIFRFA.4, a Resolution of Intention far this in;~rovenient was previously adopted by the legislative body; std the "Report" as nvw presented shall stand as the "Report" for the of subsequent procealings here- under. NOW, 'If{Q2EFDRE, the City Council of the City of Rara3w arcamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the "Report" of the Engineer referred to hereinabove is considered adopted, passes upon, and preliminarily approved, as follaus: A. That the plans and specifications for the proposed i~rove- ments to be made, contained in said "Report" be, and they are hereby' pre] imirarily approval and adopted; B. 'That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized aryl total costs and expenses of said aaluisition, where r>eassary, and impxnvenw~rts, std of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said "Report", be, and each of them aze hereby preliminarily approved and adopts]; C. That the diagram shaving the Assessment District referred to and described in said Resolution of Intention, and also the [:cv .,A ies arc1 dimensions of the respective subdivisions of lard within said n t District, as the sane exists] at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions have been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained in said "Report", be, std it is hereby prelimi- narily approved and adopted; D. That the proposal assessment upon the several subdivisions of land in said Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated bensfits to 6e receival by such subdivisions, respectively, frwn said acquisition arc] improvements, and of. the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said "Report", be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted; 'ti3 Resolution No. 91-*** Page 2 E. That the naps and descriptions of the lards and ^ts to be aa7uired, as contained in said "Report" be, and the same are hereby preliminarily approved. SEX'TION 7: That said "Report" shall stand as the E]igineer's "Report" for the purpose of all +M~+~++ant prooeediugs had pursuant to said Resolution of Intention. SECPLON 4: NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN 74V~T ON WIDNESCY~Y, 7HE 187H DAY OF DDCFpffiFI2, 1991, AT '1fR; FYJUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCR P.M., IN 7HE RIITIlJ~R MEF7'ING PLACE OF 7HI5 LFT>ISIATIVE BODY, BEIN(' 741E NUNCII. CHAEIDIILS, CITY HALL, ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY OBJFI.TIONS 70 7HE PROFOSED WORK, ~ ASSFS3g2Tf, OR EX'PfITf OF THE ASSFS.4~Nf DISTRICT, OR 7O '14R; PILOPOSID GRADES, MAY APPEAR AND 9WA CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOUlD NUl' 8E DONE OR CARRIID 0l7T IN ACCOPiV1NCE WPiH 741E RESOLUITON OF WI'FNTION AND 741E "RII~OIa"' OF '1Sfl: ENGINEER. P%7TE915 E&fiP BE IN 4II2ITIN(' AND MfJST BE DEESVFItID TO THE CTTY CE k3IIC AT ~2 BEFORE 7fiE 77ME SET EAR THE PUBLIC EiF'AR1Nf'. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk is hereJry directed to give notice of said Public Hearing by causing to be mvspianusly posted on all open streets within the n==^^~*+t District, not ~ than 300 feet apart on each street so pasted, but rot less than 3 in all, rgtioe of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and of this Resolution, all in a~xnxlance with the provisicr~s of said Division 12. SECTION 6: 7tat the City Clerk is hezrkry directed to give notice of said Public Hearitt3 anti of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and this Resolution by causing suds notice. to be published in aCODrda71CE with Sectiai 5066 of the Goverrmient Nde, in the newspaper previously desicg~ated as the newspaper for all publications as xe<7uired by law and as necessary for crnQletion of this Assessment District. SECTION 7: That the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail entice of said Public Hearing and ttre adoption of the Resolution of Intention arcs of the filing of the "Report" to all persona owning real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll for County taxes priar thereto, or as known to said City Clerk, aid to all ot}ier persons as prescribed in aocordan0e with the provisions of said Division 12. SECTION 8: 'fiat the City Clerk is hereby further dirated to file a SPY of the proposed bouldary map in the Office of the County Reeordet within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the propose3 boundary map; said bouttlary map to be in the manner aid form as set forth in Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California. ~i ~~~ RESOU7ITON NO. 91~~ / A RESOIIJTIOT] OF THE CITY 030NCII. OF 1fiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfUNGA, CAISFORNIA, ADOPTING A M4P SHGWING 1f{E PRDPOSID BOUNDARIES OF A SPECW, ASSES4~ITP DIST12ICf °`^, the City Cou~il of the City of Fandw Cucamonga has keen pre~.,entedf. atd has received a map showing and describing the ho~udaries of the area proposal to be assessed in an aa~ cement district order the provisions and authority of the 'Ttmicipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Hic~ways Code of the State of California; said assessnent district kno.m and desig~ted as ASSESSFffNT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (herei~fter referred to as the "n~cc~cnwnr District"). NOA, THEREBORE, the City Council of the City of Poncho Ncamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECITON 1: That the above recitals are all five attn correct. SECTION 2: That a map of the Assessment District showing the boundaries of the prapcsed Assessment District and lards and property to be assessed to pay the ousts and expenses of the proposed improvenrnts desigreted as "FROPOSID BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1" is hereby submittal, and the same is hereby approved aryl adapted. SECTION 3: That the original map of said propcz-,ed buuxlaries of the proposed Assessment District and one copy thereof is to to filed in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4: A certificate shall be endorsed on the origi~l and on at least one copy of the map of the Assessment District, evidencing the date a-d adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of hearitg on the formation or extent of said Assessment District, a copy of said map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Reeoxder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Hic~iways CUde of the State of California. ,_ pr (5 RESOIUIT(kl N0. 91~~ A RESOIIIPION OF THE CITY (IxJNCII, OF THE C71Y OF RAN(330 (.LiCAbDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DFLTARTNG INPII7f'T(ki TO (H2OFR THE Itl,^. f'AtTATT(Nl OF CERPAIN IN A PId7FOSID ASSF5.4AINf DISIRICI; DfXT.ARIIdGG THE VARIC 1U BE OF FDRE THAN IACAL OR ORDINARY BENEFTT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT 1C1 BE ASSESSID TO PAY THE O(YoTS AND ESCPENSES THERD3F; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSWNCE OF BONUS NOW, THEREFORE, the City (buncil of the City of Rarxl1o Qrcamorxla does hereby resolve as follows: SECTI(kl 1: The public interest and oornenienoe require, and it is the intention of this lady, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12 of the Streets aryl Highways Code of the State of (~lifornia (the "hLmicipal Tn4uoVe- ment Act 1913") , to order the installation of certain public ircprov~euds, together with a„ +rtc..wrraa aril apla,rterunt work, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMFNi' DISiRICf NO. 89-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"). DESCRIPFI(kl OF B~VFNII31i5 A. The financing of certain public i~rovemnts described as the installation of certain public street irRnrovennnts in MTTrrtccrr AVENUE and other streets, including larrlscaping, sewer, water, drainage, street lights, underyraud electrical and am~unication facilities, gas lines and railroad ca.~orasing i~rovements, together with a, ~ +++_~~~ and appurtenant work, to serve and benefit properties within the hn,.,rtaries of the Iyssaccsment District. B. Said streets, rights-of-way and easements shall be shwm upon the plans herein referred to and to be filed with these proceedings. C. All of said work and ingnrovements are to be installed at the places and in the partiwlar locations, of the forns, sizes, dirmnsions and materials, and at the lines, grades and elevations as shorn arcl delineated upon the plans, profiles arcl specifications to be Wade therefor, as hereinafter providsl. D. the description of the ingirovemPnts and the termini of the work contained in this Resolution are general in nature. All items of work do not neczssarily extend for the full lergtlr of the description thereof. The plans and profiles of the work as contained in the Engineers "Report" shall be controlling as to the correct and detailsl description thereof. E. Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running between two public ways, or from or to any public way, the intersections of the public ways refelra3 to are included to the extent that work shall be shoes on the plans to be done therein. F. Notice is hereby given of the fact that in uany cases said work and i~rovement will bring the finished work to a grade different from that formerly exiatirq, and that to said extent, said grades are hereby charged and said work will be done to said changed grades. -1~~ Resolution No. 9I-*** Page 2 pLTIg7 OF ASSFS.4+lETTI DISTRICP SECPION 2: 'fiat said inprovm~ents arxi work are of direct benefit to the properties aryl larx3 within the Assessment District, arx] this legislative body hereby makes the expenses of said work and infirw~'noent c3rarcleable upon a district, which said Assessment District is herelry declared to be the Assess- ment District benefited by said work aril .inQmvenents and to be assessed to paY the costs atd ey,~., thereof, including incidental expes~es attl casts and which is described as folle«~: All that certain territory in the District included within the exterior bwnlaty lines shown on the plat exhibiting the property affected or benefits3 bi' or to be ~ to paY the costs arcl expenses of said work and inprovements in the Assessment District, said map titled arxl identified as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OR ASSF5.4fINf OTSiRICT NO. 89-1", arcl which map cgs heretofore approved aril which said map or diagram is on file with the trar~ipt of these procea9ings, F~CCCEYIPING therefrom the area shwm within and delineated upwn said map or plat hereinabove referred to, the area of all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, and all easements aryl rights-of-way therein contained belonging to the public. For all partiwlars as to the borndaries of the Assent District, reference is hereby made to said boundary map heretofore previously approved and on file. 12FT0~LI' OF FSICIMEER SEX'PIGN 3: llut this proposed inpmva1w11t is hereby referred to NEfS/I17r7RY, who is herelry direc.~ted to make and file the report in writing oontaini~ the follv~ni~: A. Plans and specifications of the proposed inprovements; B. An estimate of the cost of the proper works of inq~rove- ment, including the cost of the incidental expeivses in connection therewith; C. A diagram shading the t District above referred to, which shall also shod the boundaries and dimensions of the respective sub- divisions of lard within said n~ct+~cmont bistrict, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions shall be given a separate number upon said Diagram; D. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the --= =='%le costr and, e~~~ of the pry inprovement upon the several divisiore of lard in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such sub- divisions, re_Gpectively, fran said i~rovement. Said ~t shall refer to such subdivisions upon said diagram by the respective numbers thereof; E. 'the description of the works of inq~rovenient to be installed order these procee<lirgs, and acquisition, where necessary. When any portion or percentage of the cost and expenses of the improvermnts is to be paid from sources other than ^* ,the amaait of such portion or percentage shall first be deducted fran the total estimated ~-~}1 Resolution No. 91-xxx Page 3 cysts arcl expenses of said work and i~rovements, arcl said ~••~ shall include only the ranainder of the estimated costs arcl ri c said assess- ment shall refer to said sulxlivisions by their respective rnmiters as assigned p.¢svant to Srtsection D. of this section. BONDS SFX,TION 4: Notice is hereby given that bonds to represent the unpaid assesanents, and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed the current legal maxinRmi rate of twelve percent (12~) per annum, will be issued hereunder in ~e~man~ P~v~ ~ the "Improvement Bold Act of 1915", heilKJ Division 10 c~rvrays Code of the state of California, which bwds shall mature a maxinwn of arcl not to exceed 'IY7ETJIY-FOUR (24) YF7rILS frvn the seoand day of Septanher next succeeding twelve (12) months fran their date. the provisions of Part il.l of said Act, providing an alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the calling of bonds shall apply. the principal amount of the bonds maturircJ eac3r y~r shall be other than an amormt equal to an even arvmm~l proportion of the aggregate principal of the bonds, and the amamt of principal maturircl in ~th year, plus the amwnt of intent payable in that year, will be generally an aggregate amamt that is equal each year, except for the first year's adjus~w. nt. Pursuant to the provisions of the streets arcl Highways Code of the State of California, specifically section 10603, the Treasurer is hereby designated as the officer to collect and receive the assessments during the cash collection period. Said bowls Bother shall be serviced by the Treasurer or designated paying Agent. RF3!UNDING Any bonds lssued pursuant to these proceedings arc] Division (a) may be refunded, (b) the interest rate on said bolds shall rat exceed the maximWn interest rate as authorized for these proceedings, and the ntmJnet of years to maturity shall not exceed the maximran number as authorized for these bonds unless a public hearing is expressly held as authorized pursuant to said Division 11.5, and (c) any adjustments in assessments resulting fray arty refundirgs will be done on a pro-rata basis. Arty authorized refunding shall to p+rc++~nt to the above conditions, arcl p+r~+ant to the provisiorns and restrictions of Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, «mrencing with section 9500, and all further conditions shall be set forth in the Bond Indenture to be approved prior to arty issuance of bonds. "MUNICIPAL II~IPROVIIdF1JP ACP OF 19_ SFX'1`ION 5: 'that except as herein otherwise provided for the issuance of bonds, all of said improvements shall he rude and ordered pursuant to the provisions of the 'Ttunicipal Improvemmnt Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. ~tig Resolution No. 91-*** Page 4 SURPLUS ESRdIS SECPION 6: ~Ifiat if any exce,s shall be realized fmn the assessment, it shall be used, in svdr amounts as the legislative body may determine, in accordance with the provisiorvs of law for one or more of the following P~P~: A. Transfer to the general ford; provided that the amount of arty such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of Ore Dlousarid Dollars ($1,000.00) or five percent (5$) of the total fran the InSsovarent F1ud; B. As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assesmrnt; or C. For the maintenance of the ixcQrovaiwst. SEt•PION 7: the legislative body hereby establishes a special rnQrovamnt ford identified arc] designated by the roe of this "_- ^-'-t District, and into said ELnd monies may be transferrer] at arty time to expedite the making of the iriprova~ents herein authorizer], and arty such advarrcamnt of funds is a loan and shall be repaid art of the proceeds of the sale of binds as authorized by law. PRP/A1'E CONIRACf SBLTION 8• Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be served by allowing the property carers to take the contract for the installation of the inpovvanerrts, and that, as authorized bi' law, m notice of award of contract shall be publishe3. Lsi.1!L SE7CiTON 9: ]fiat Nttice is hereby given that the grade to which the work shall be done is to be shown on the plans and profiles therefor, whidr grade may vary from the existing grades. 2fie work herein contemplated shall be done to the grades as indicated on the plans and specifications, to which reference is made far a description of the grade at which reference is made for a description of the grade at which the work is to be done. Any objec- tions or protzsLt to the proposed grade shall be made at the public hearing to be corrhrcted order these proceedings, PROCEmING.S II40[JIItIFS SBGTION 10: For arty and all information relating to these prooeed- ings, including information relating to protest procedure, your atterrtion is directed to the person desigreted below: ,TERRY FVLFAOD, DEPUPY CITY MANAGER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(',A P, O. BOX 807 RANQiO CUCAAANiGA, CA 91729 TELEPFKKJE: (714) 989-1851 ~1~ Resolution No. 91-*** Page 5 PUBLIC PROPERPY SECPION 11: All public property in the use and performance of a public function shall be omitted fmn assessment in these proceg3irgs unless expressly provided and listed herein. NO CITY LTABILI'1"L SECPION 12: 'fiis legislative body hereby further declares not to obligate itself to advance available fords fran the Treasury to cure arty deficiency which may ocas in the bond rerlarq~tion ford. 'This dafe.+~; nation is made pursuant to the authority of Section 8769 (b) of the Streets and Hic~rways Code of the State of California, arcl said determination shall furttrer be set forth in the text of the bonds issued pursuant to the "Ir~rwement bond Act of 1915". PEPTI'ION SfX,TION 13: That a petition signed by property owners representing more than sixty percent (60$) in area of the propea-Ly subject to assessment for said improvement has been signed and filed with the legislative body, and rro further proceedings or actions will be rmn;rer] order Division 4 of the Streets and Hicktrays Code of the State of California, the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931". FtlR1C ON PRIVATE PROPEKi'Y sa:rloN 14: It is hereby further determirwrl to be in the best public interest and conwsience and more economical to do certain work on private property to eliminate any disparity in level or size betwe<+n the inq~rovamnts and the private property. 'ttte actual cost of such work is to be added to the assessment on the lot on which the work is dons, arrl no work of this mature is to be performed until the written consent of the property owner is first obtained. ANNUAL AIX+mJISPRATTVE ASSES.44EIJI' SFC;i'ION 15: It is hereby declared that this legislative body proposes to levy an annual assessment pursuant to Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, said annual assessment to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration arr] collection of assessments or fran the administration or registration of any associated bowls and reserve of other related fords. AGRER~tEIVi' 1bR II~ROVII~]J15 SEX`1'ION 16: It is hereby further declared that certain of the irry~rovements will be urxler the ownership, matwgement and maintenance of a public agency or public utility other than the city corctuctirg the proceed- ings. In order to authorize the financing of said inprovements, Stret.ts and Highways Code Section 10110 specifically requires that an agree;ient to entered into between the city and the respective agency or utility setting forth certain of the terms and conditions regarding the facilities. Those Agree- ments shall be approvod and on file prior to the public hearing; said Agree- ments to relate to the follaairg: y 2fl Resolution No. 91-xxx Page 6 A. 4R,TII2 II~IL7VIIgTTlu: (SICNDNGA OODNfY VIATiR DISII2ICf B. RAII%ND II~II~RDVFSR3715: A'I17D:9~7 10PFIQ\ APID SANfA FE RAII-7AY Q7[9PANY ~-itil STAFF REPORT ,-,-~.~ GATE: November 6, 1991 ~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager '~, FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Jue O'Neil, City Engineer '. SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT 7HE DRAFT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN AS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD Of THE SAN BERNARDI NO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS IN THEIR ROLE AS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING '' REPORT. RECOMMENDATION It fs recommended that the City Council give genera{ dl rec ti on on support of the Draft Congestion management Plan with continued input through its SANBAG board representative during remaining development of Lhe Plan. The plan will provide a cons{ slant area wT de analysis process for use in local land use decisions and how they effect the environment, development densities and traffic and transportation systems in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and neighboring agencies. The plan will provide Proposition 111 funding to help mitigate roadway deficiencies and put the City in conformance with State law. DISCUSSION On July 10, 1989, Assembly 8111 No. 472 became law. Funded by an increase in the Gas Tax (Proposition 111), the bill mandated Congestion Management Plan development for every county within the State that has an urbanized area. On March 12, 1990, Assembly Bill No. 1191 became law and amended certain sections of AB 472 relating to CMP development. Under the provisions of the iegislation, a Congestion Management Agency (CMAI had to be designated for San Bernardino County. The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) was designated as the CMA for this county. SANBAG's responsibilities are as follows: 1. Develop a CMP for the County of San Bernardino; 2. (n su re the County and cities adopt the requt red programs and ordinances listed in the legislation; and 3. Conduct annual monitoring of the County and cities to determine compliance with the legislation and adopted plan. The law states the CMD must contain the following: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 2 Element No. 1: Traffic "Level of Service" standards Element No. 2: Public transit frequency and routing standards Element No. 3: Trip reduction and travel demand program and ordinance Element No. 4: Land use analysis program, and Element No. 5: Seven year capital improvement program (CIP). The County and each city are responsible for the following: a. Adopt and implement a trip reduction and travel demand ordinance; b. Adopt and implement a program to analyze the impacts of land use decisions; c. Prepare a deficiency plan when levels of service drop below the adopted standard; d. Update the CMP roadway network on an annual basis; e. Monitor the service and performance standards of the network; f. Develop a seven-year CIP; and g. Maintain a transportation computer model consistent with adopted methodology (RIYSAN ). To develop the CMP, UHK d Associates was employed by the CMA. The legislation requires input from, and coordination with, various jurisdictions and governmental entities prior to the adoption of the plan. A CMP Technical Advisory Committee (CMPTAC) made up of engineering and planning personnel of Cal trans, Omni tra ns, the county and the cities was formed to provide the necessary input and guidance in the development of the plan and meet the legal requirements of the bill. City staff served on the Engineering subcommittee of the CMPTAC. Planning concerns were submitted to SANBAG and the Planning subcommittee of Lhe CMPTAC through the City/County Planning Directors' Committee rather than by subcommittee. Element No. 4 of the CMP requires adoption and implementation of a Land Use/Transportation Analysis. The Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program will benefit local fort sdictlons in several ways: • Development and maintenance of a set of consistent guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Reports, to provide local decision makers with comprehensive data on project impacts, needed mitigations, and costs to assist in making local land use decisions. The guidelines provide a consistent set of criteria for the content and organization of traffic impact reports. • Opportunity to be informed of an provide substantive response to potential impacts of development prof ec is in surrounding jurisdictions. The CMP Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program provides a set of procedures for addressing inter jurisdictional impacts. 1123 CITY COUNC iL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 3 • Information generated by a TIA Report can serve as a basis for equitable allocation of costs among projects, jurisdictions, and other funding sources to mitigate transportation impacts on the CMP system. • A program will be created to provide a consistent area wide analysis process for the mitigation of impacts on the CMP network resulting from local land use decisions. The authority to approve or deny development rests with local jurisdictions. However, the Land Use/Transports Lion Analysis Program has the potential to influence local land use decisions by requi rT ng full evaluation and disclosure of impacts to Lhe regional transportation system, regardless of ju rt sdicti onal boundaries. local jurisdictions are required to maintain the adopted level of servl ce standards on the CMP system, so it is es senttal that local jurisdictions consider the necessary actions and costs required to mitigate impacts resulting from local land use decisions. The success of the program relies on each jurisdiction maintaining consistency with applicable regional plans and the cooperative efforts of all local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and SANBAG. A jurisdiction which falls to mitigate deficiencies on the CMP system which are caused by its land use decisions may face withholding of its Proposition 111 gas tax lnc rement funds. The CMP draft has been written Lo address all the areas dictated by the legislation. Several policy issues have been raised regarding the CMA's interpretation of the legislation, responsibilities, mandates and functions under the CMP. These issues have been addressed by the draft CMP as listed below. City staff concurs with the current draft of the plan. 1. ROADWAYS ON THE CMP NETWORK The regional roadway network in the City of Rancho Cucamonga includes the following streets: Route 30 (19th Street, Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue) from west to east City limits; Base Line Road from west to east City limits; State Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) from west to east City limits; Arrow Route from west City limit to Milliken Avenue; 4th Street from west to east City limits; Grove Avenue from 8th Street to Arrow Route; Archibald Avenue from south City limit to 19th Street; Haven Avenue from south City limit to Highland Avenue; Milliken gvenue from south City limit to Highland Avenue; ~~-1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 4 I-15 from south to north City limits. 2. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS FOR THE REGIONAL ROADWAY NETWORK Exhibit "A" outlines the definitions of LOS Standards for signalized intersections. These levels are determined from traffic flow counts performed during peak hour periods. For the purposes of the CMP, peak hours are defined as 7 to 9 A.M. and 4 to 6 P.M. The GMP specifies an LOS of D for rural areas and E for urban areas, unless the existing LOS at the time the plan is adopted is lower. In the first year, the draft CMP addresses maintenance of the level of service on the CMP system through four components, each of which is a requirement of the CMP statute: a) Analysis of land use decisions to identify potential impacts of protect implementation, select among mitigation alternatives, and assess mitigation costs. b) Traffic modeling of the CMP forecast year (2000) conditions. Forecast problems are to be addressed through facility-specific "corridor improvement programs-" c) Deficiency plans, the mechanism provided by the CMP to address cases in which the LOS deteriorates below the standard as measured in the field. Actions to mitigate the deficiency could be improvements Lo the deficient roadway, or could Instead be system wide actions to improve air quality and levels of service. d) Capital Improvement Program. The elements listed above are the mechanisms provided in the draft CMP through which projects are incorporated Into the CMP Capital improvement Program. The first two elements are designed to avoid the occurrence of deficiencies, and the third 1s the mechanism by which an actual deficiency is addressed. Subsequently, when LOS drops to F (or 109; lower than existing delay value for Intersections already at F at adoption), a Deficiency Plan must be prepared at Cfty expense (Prop. 111 funds may be used) and submitted to the CMA. The plan must provide for reattaining the LOS by acceptable means, which may be development project related or by means of the Capital Improvement Program and does not appear to have specific time constraints at this time. Regular monitoring of the CMP network by the City using Prop. Ill funds will be used to determine whether the required LOS is being ~{7S C[TY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 5 maintained. Concerns were raised regarding a uniform LOS standard for both rural and urban areas. All streets Within City limits are designated urban, therefore it is appropriate to use separate standards far rural and urban areas because there are areas in San Bernardino County which will never be urbanized. 3- PROJECT REVIEW THRESHOLDS The draft CMP requires that Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Reports be prepared Dy local jurisdictions using iocal project size thresholds to trigger preparation of the TIA which would include mitigation measures for the CMP network. For example, the proposed service station, car wash, mini-mart development at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and East Avenue was required to do a traffic study. In the future this required traffic study would follow the TIA format established 6y the CMPTAC. The TIA Reports will be copied to SANBAG. In addition to considering impacts and mitigation measures in our City, the CMP requires not7fi ca ti on to other jurisdictions in certain circumstances, for example: If the TIA Report determines that a project would add 50 or more 2-way peak hour trips to a CMP arterial within another jurisdiction or 100 or more 2-way peak hour trips to a freeway, that other jurisdiction and/or Cal trans will also be provided a copy of the TIA Report by the perniitting jurisdiction. The use of local thresholds is subject to a floor of ~ the values required for an EIR. This is to prevent unreasonably high limits which would avoid any report preparation at all. it is the responsibiiity of the local jurisdiction to provide review copies of the T[A Report to SANBAG and potentially impacted jurisdictions so that review will occur 1n concert with the permitting jurisdiction's project review schedule, and prior to project approval. Should SANBAG identify serious technical flaws Tn the TIA Report such that resubmission by the local jurisdiction is required, SANBAG will initiate this request and notify potentially impacted jurisdlctT ons of same. Enforcement of this requirement to prepare a TIA and provide mitigation for impacts in a neighboring jurisdiction is loose and unspecified. No punitive measures are available for non- compliance other than the ability of the CMA to withhold a City's Prop. I11 funds only after a deficiency plan shows a deficiency in a neighboring City to have been caused by a permitted project. The conflict resolution process covered in X7 below may help address this issue. 4. COORDINATION OF REQUIRED TRIP REDUCTION/TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 6 WITN OTHER REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS The CMPTAC requested that SANBAG contact the Air Quality Management District (AQMO) and Air Pollution Control District (APCD) to coordinate the development of this element with the development of the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The draft element Includes CMP control measures from the AQMP for the Valley and the APCD for the Mountains. Model ordinances are being developed by, and in coordination with, both Districts for the CMP. The Trip Reduction/Travel Demand Management Ordinance has at least five purposes: a. To improve transportation system efficiency by developing measures that will increase the person through-put of the system with a minimum of capital improvements. b. To integrate modal opts ens by ensuring that measures chosen are supportive of alternative mode choices. c. To reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by encouraging alternative choices. d. To improve the overall system level of service by reducing vehicle demand or by maximizing the person through-put of the system. e. To integrate air quality planning requirements with the transportation planning and programming functions. Alternative transportation methods would include carpools, vanpools, transit, bicycles, and park-and-ride lots; Improvements in the balance between jobs and housing; and other strategies, including flexible work hours and parking management programs. 5. ORO[NANCE ADOPTION DATES The adoption of the Trip Reduction/Travel Demand Ordinance must precede the CMA's determination of conformance with the CMP. The CMA has tentatively scheduled conformity review for the Fall of 1992. Local jurisdictions are currently planning to adopt all ordinances Dy June of 1992. 6. REQUIREMENTS FOR CMP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEN The draft initial study and SANBAG's counsel opinion suggest that a Negative Declaration is adequate for the CMP. Some SANBAG board members have shown interest in deferring the adoption far ~~ti~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 1 one year and undertaking a full EIR. Staff supports the opinion of SANBAG's legal staff that the CMP does not, in itself, constitute a project pursuant to CEQA and, thus, does not need more than a negative Declaration prior to its enac Lnent. ?f a full EIR were to be conducted, CMP adoption would be deferred for one year. Cost of the EIR would be high. There may be further financial impacts in that development projects approved by without the CMP in place would not have been appropriately conditioned to mitigate congestion problems that occur in neighboring agencies. 7. CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES Conflict resolution procedures for Inter jurisdictional disputes are being developed by the CMPTAC and a subcommittee thereof. These procedures will probably be included either by reference in the CMP or in the CMP Appendix. The process could stand alone and be available for other programs as well. No other CMA has included such a process in a CMP to date. 8. ESTIMATED CMP REVENUES AND COSTS Costs incurred by the City fn the operation of this program can 6e charged against Proposition 111 funds. It is each ba seddontithe siegislati oni andy wi thi nn thet plan to dopt d by oSANBAGs Staff has commented on all drafts, attended all meetings, and given input recommending that local jurisdictions be given as much control as possible in implementing this program. The cost for preparing TIA Reports will be the responsibility of the project proponent. Traffic counts, staff review and deficiency plans will be at the expense of the local jurisdictions. The somewhe9e between nE150e000 and 5820,0002 (depending ion population figures used and any growth projected) per year for Rancho Cucamonga at full implementation of the tax, which is in 1994. There is a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement before Proposition 111 funds can be used; whereby, each jurisdlc ti on must maintain a level of descretionary expenditures for street purposes (generally General Fund) in excess of the annual average amount spent in fiscal years 1987/88, 1988/89 and 1989/90. Our MOE base level is E2,540,379. and must be maintained for the years starting with Fiscal Year 90/91. 9. IMPACTS ACROSS INTER COUNTY BOUNDARIES The CMPTAC raised concerns regarding adjacent counties bordering local jurisdlc Lions and the mitigation of impacts as a result of their land use decisions. The legislation does not address inter 428 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PAGE 8 county trips. The CMP's for neighboring counties (Riverside, Orange, and Las Angeles), according to the legislation, fall within the jurisdiction of SCAG. Any consideration of mitigating any inter county traffic problems remains unresolved. According to the legislation, it is the responsibility of the regional agency (SCAG) to determine inter county conformity between plans. At the present time, SCAG staff is waiting for legal counsel to render an opinion delineating its responsibilities under the legislation. All participants in the development of the CMP reali to modifications undoubtedly will be necessary after the first year of operation. SANRAG (CMA) has taken the posture that some issues are to 6e referred back to the CMPTAC for resolution during the f7rst year of operation of the CMP. it will be the CMPTAC's respon si billty to prepare guidelines modifying the operations of the CMP for future adoption by SANRAG. The CMP is scheduled to be adopted by Lhe SANRAG Board at its November 1991 meeting. It is important to note, based on the legislation and the plan, if a local jurisdiction is determined to he out of conformity with the CMP as adopted Tn November 1991 by the CMA, the jurisdiction will not receive its gas tax Incremental funding until it is detennl ned to be in conformance. A jurisdiction can be found to be non-conforming if: 1) the levels of service of parts of its CMP Roadway System fall below adopted standards and deficiency plan is either not adopted or not adhered to, or 2) the ju rlsdicti an fails to adopt and implement a trip reduction and travel demand ordinance, or 3) the jurisdiction fails to adopt and implement a program to analyze the impacts of land use decisions including estimation of the costs to mitigate these impacts, or 4) the jurisdiction fails to monitor its portion of the CMP network, provide appropriate data and reports to other agencies and SANRAG. This represents the status of CMP to date. Attached is a summary of the SANRAG Board guidance, through September 25, 1991, on policy issues. Respectfully Sut)mi~bt~ed RG:JO:JTHay ~~- Attachment ~j2~1 E%IIIBIT 'A' LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay Ts a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level-of-service criteria are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15 minute analysis period. Level-of-service A describes operations with very low delay, i. e., less than 5.0 sec. per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level-of-servitt B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 sec. per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level-of-servltt C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sec. per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear Tn this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level-of-service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec. per vehicle. At level 0, the Influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level-of-service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 sec. per vehicle. This 15 considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Lerel-of-servitt F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec. per vehicle. This 15 considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with over saturation, 1. e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ~30 SANBAG BOARD GUIDANCE ON t'_tviP POLICY ISSUPS (Issues on which guidance was provided by Board at workshops are checked) Boatd Wortcshoo Issuc/CMPI'AC Recom DiscussedT Recommendation !1. CMPLAC-recommended Yes Support. network. !2. System of Regional Signdicance graphic. J3. LOS Standards -urban roadways at legal minimum. !4. HOV Lane standard. !5. LOS F - 10% deterioration. !6. Urban vs. total standards. !T. Urban vs. mtal boundary. /S. Project review focus in first year. /9. Comprehensive areawide mitigation (fee) program in subsequent years. lIO. 77veshold for TIA preparation. !l 1. Distance limit on analysis. Yes Exclude. Yes Support (not consensus). Yes Defer inclusion. Yes Support. Yes Legal minvnum N all areas. Caltrans recommends rural LOS D. Yes Not needed if sandards are uniform. Otherwise support sphere boundaries. Yes Support. Yes Support investigation of comp. trans. plan development, and ateawide mitigation ProgrNn if appropriate. Yes Internal jurisdiction threshold to Ill CEQA, TIAs required for larger projects. Yes 5 miles (more at local discretion) & SOi 100 guideline. ~-I 31 Lssue/CMPTAC Rerom. /12. SANBAG monitoring process. /13. Interjurisdictional notification and unpact mitigation through TTA process. J14. CMP Emphasis N fast year (see q8 above). JIS. CMP Emphasis in later years (see q9 above). J16. Interjurisdictional analysis and mitigation through Deficiency Plans. J17. Conflict resolution process. J18. Intercounty impacts and midgauon. J19. Contents of local TDM ordinance. /20. Environmental documenution. J2t. Local resources. Boartl Woricshw Disassed7 liecommendation Yes Copy TIAs [o SANBAG. Yes Copy TlAs to jurisdictions per the i0/100 guideline. Yes Support project review in first year. Yes Investigate comprehensive approach. Yes Prepare plans under aegis of SANBAG at request of local jurisdiction(s). Yes Use CMPTAC to develop conflict resolution process. Yes Use CMPTAC to study issue and incorporate guidance into CMP update. Yes Work with air districts through CMPCAC [o develop model ordinances appropriate for the AQMD and APCD. Yes Circulate Neg. Dec., discuss further as ner~essary, Yes Use CMPTAC to review periodically. ~3Z UC"[OEE't+ 29, 1791 L. [ T•1 Of RRPIC, FIO CUC i7h1ONGR RTTI•I: Uf:.E4~IL i{DRMFi - CITY' CLE R4+ 1~.~5'JG CI'JIC CENTER URIVC RRIJCHO CUCHMONGR~ CR. 91729 UERR MS. RDRMS~ 1 WOUI_.D ~ i!(E TU REQUEST THRT I EE RBLE TO 5F'ERN, TO 'f HE CITY' LOCNCIL RT THE'IR NOVEMEER E, 1991 MEETING UNDER "COMMENTS f'I'+UM 7HE F'L18LIC" FOR THE F'URF'OSE OF RERUESTING THRT COUNCIL P~OSTFONE MRK IPIG R DECISION ON THE RECOMMF.NDRTI ON FROM THE FRRk;S RNG RFCRF.R'fION COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMEER 20, 199!. I WOULD LIKE FOR -i HE COUNCIL TO INSTERD SCHEDULE TWO Uk THREE WURFSSIiUPS OR OPEN FORUM MEETINGS TO DISCUSS THE COMMISS'IONS' RECOMMENDRTIONS RND TO PERSONRLLV GET q FETTER VIEW OF THE VOTER'S FEELINGS ON THIS VERV UELICRTE ISSUE. F'LISRSE: RDVIGE IF THIS REQUEST WILL E+E F'UT UN THE NUVEMEER t;TH RGEhIDR. 1 CRN DE RERCHED RT 714-9EV-20'70 DURING THE URr~ '714-9437-9677 IPI THE EVENING, OR EV F'RGER 714--455-447. I HAW' •CIU+ Rnr.~f,:RT r,. oLRRt tt 96 °.'i MRIJL RNI"fR DR7VE RL TR L OhIR~ CR. '31 701 OCT 3 O 1N1 ~~~ k33 Esfizlalani Engi~reering h. O.S. SL'.\f`Y,17 b7RtGf J,~"9{¢NLf1RANC9407kUCAA~ONGA r7l-01776-7197 ' P~nNN:NG DIVf516N - NOY 11981 ~ ?i~~g~8j8ovember Departmen?: of Planning ity or Ranchc Cucamonga ! iCSGG 'i vie Center Drive 2.0. act 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Reference: amendment of Devel moment Standard for Multi-Family residential district. 'ientati ve Tract No. 15139 Proposed 10 Units Condominium 8556 E. Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 ;to pourable Mayor and Cou r.cilmember: 1991 :i-:is applica r. t, and his westerly neighbor have been in the h '~.anrn ng Department since September 1950, to process ttte a i:ove fer.ta`ive n?an for approval. iia cd cn the .`act that Planning Department wishes to limn: .., ~,; Tiber of access from Arrow Roura to our site, three complota plans have been submict.ed for staff t:eview between September 1990 and November 1.391. The response or. r„he review o;: the second Submittal, suggested January 1591, was i:o a pproacP. our adjacent property owner for a shared driveway .`.. om Arrow Route. Between January and June 1991 the owners of `he two properties neootia t,ed for a common driveway and concluded for preparation of file site and archi t:ecrural plan. Cn October 31, 1991 we have received comments cn our latest. s~.t i,ni tta., and pr e:,or. t.ly are preparing the changes requested irv the sr:aff. 'Cho proposed amendmen`. (Resolution 91-134) was brought. to our a`•ention late Sept.embar 1991. r:'.;r placr; and -:pplicarion have been in the process f.or over a Tear, s;.n>;y for not knowi nq what. driveway is acceptable to rat: thr~ 41e have worked hard ro come out. with the latest shared c.,:crday, and accordingly the latest plan are based on fho turn-~nf De.velopment 5?andard. 'Lice proposed Resolution No. J; -I3A will destroy a full year of our design work and can s=rioualy dafaage the financial support of this project., 1111',A'11,11'1/`~'1 "til,"S"'R/~i'.I 1'U Vyr r/'r 17,p 11' Rancho Cucamonga Council Page No. 2 November 4, 1991 Therefore, We respectfidly request the council to add a clause or a sr_atement in this resolution that will exclude (Tentative Map No. 15138 s 15139) this project from the proposed amendment. Respec tfu l ly ~QS~~u~bmitted; "" _~ Khosroo Esfahlani Property owner-Engineer `' i TABLE 17.08.040 - B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (WR-NOT REQUIRED) VL L LM M MN H LOT AREA: 22500 8000 6000 3AC 3AC 3AC MINIMUM NET ACERAGE (L) (L) (L) MINIMUM N T 20000 7200 5000 3AC 3AC 3AC (L) (L) 0.) NUMB R CIF DWELLING UNITS (A) (PERMITTED PER ACRE) UP T02 UP T04 UP TO6 UP T011 UP TO/9 UP T027 MINIMUM DWELLING UNR SQE: (I) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1,000 SOFT. (H) REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT DETACHED DWELLING MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS (J} EFFICIENCVlSTUDIO 550 SOFT. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT ONE BEDROOM 650 SOFT. REGA DLESS OF DISTRICT TWO BEDROOM 600 S0. . REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT THR E OR MORE BEDR 950 50. . REGA OL O DISTRIO LOT DIMENSIONS MINIMUM WIDTH (@REOUIRED 90 AVG, 65 AVG. SO AVG. WR WR WR FRONT SETBACK) VARY./ 10 VARY d~ 5 VARY N~ 5 MINIMUM CORNER LOT WI TH 100 70 50 Wfl WR WR MINIMUM DEPTH 150 100 90 WR WR WR MINIMUM FRONTAGE 50 40 30 100 100 100 (@ FRONT PROPERTY LINE) MINIMUM FLAG LOT FRONTAGE 30 20 20 50 50 50 (@ FRONT PROPERTY LINE) SETBACKS: (B) FRONT YARD (C,E) 42 AVG. 37 AVG. 32 AVG. 37 AVG. WR N/R VARV.hS VARY./~5 VARV.l~S VARY./~5 CORNER SIDE YARD 27 27 22 27 WR WR INTERIOR SIDE YARD 10/15 910 5/10 10 WR WR (o) REAR YARD 30 20 15 10 WR WR (D) AT INTERIOR SITE BOUNDARY 30/5 20/5 15/5 15/5 75/5 15/5 (DWELLING UNIT/ACCESSORY (D) (D) (D) BLDG) EXHIBIT A 1 " ~~~~ RESOL']FION NO. 91-012F A RESOUJITON OF THE CTIY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO QJCANYIEKSA, CALIEURNLA, EXTIIJDING ~i7EIPY OF SAN BERI~RDII~lO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH CON(AS'P CABLE T.V. FOR 90 GAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURI2FN'L' LICNSE WTItIII~] THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAEYINGA. WEIIRFA.S, the Franchise License granted to Comcast Cable T.V. by the County of San mr..a,B;,,~, and grandfathered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga will expire on November 8, 199' and W}B~RFAS, nslotiations are ongoing between the City of Rancho Gucamorga and Comcast Cable T.V.; and WfiERFA.S, all terms and conditions of the current licervse will continue the same. NOW, TfQ~REFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga doe, hereby resolve to exteid the Franchise License for 90 days after the expira- tion of the current County of San Bernardino Licesvse. LAW Oii1C E9 O LIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE TH MAS W 3TOEVER O A Pgof ESSIDry.µ [ORP ORATION W IL LIgM B, gARP CHPRLESS VOSE IOBO SV NSET BOU LEVARV CpN NIE COOpE SAN VIPER LOS ANOELES~ CALIFORNIA 9B 01Y lAM E3 OViF MVpPNY ROGER W SPRINOEq (I I3) ZSO~SOA3 EOW qpO W LEE H ERIBERTO F, OIAZ NICER MIYA HIRA BETH 5 BEfl GMAN November 4, 1991 The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers city of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Community Facilities District No. 91-1 Public Hearing - November 6, 1991 Pierotti Property Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers; IC LECOPSER (]I]I qqi 336 This firm has been retained by the Pierotti Family to represent their interest with respect to the establishment of the Community Facilities District referenced above. This letter is submitted pursuant to Government Code Section 53323 and in this regard we Wish to register the Pierotti's objection to and protest of the creation of this district. For the reasons set forth below, it is our opinion that this district is proposed in a manner which does not comply with the scope and intent of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, applicable State Statutes, and Constitutional guarantees. in reviewing the background reports and documentation which were submitted to support the formation of this district, it appears that the City has failed to follow the requirements of the California Environmental quality Act ("CEQA") in that there has not been minimal compliance with a basic level of environmental review. The level of public improvements proposed, and the resulting private improvements of properties within and adjacent to the district will have an obvious significant impact on the environment. Without full environmental review and public discussion of this proposal, an informed decision cannot be reached and potential impacts cannot be considered. In this same regard, it appears that the public and private improvements contemplated by this proposal are not consistent with the traffic, land-use, and growth elements of the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There also exist certain inconsistencies with the Redevelopment Plan O LIVER, STOEVER, BARB 6 VOSE The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of Rancho Cucamonga November 4, 1991 Page 2. adopted for portions of the area which are within the proposed District. This proposed District constitutes an unlawful taking of property without just compensation. As proposed, the District contemplates the acquisition (by eminent domain) of property currently owned by the Pierotti Family. The need for this acquisition is for public right-of-way and redevelopment purposes. This would require our clients to pay for a portion of the acquisition of their own property when the alleged purpose of the acquisition is for the benefit of the public. Furthermore, the commitment to acquire and condemn property as part of the creation of this district is in direct violation of the state Eminent Domain Procedures and the requirement for fair and unbiased hearings prior to any decision to acquire property. Of greatest concern is the manner in which this District is being proposed to the detriment of a majority of the landowners. Evidence submitted to date suggests that the City Council has predetermined the decision and the public hearing is a mere sham attempt to comply with legal requirements. The District boundaries have clearly been unconstitutionally gerrymandered to manipulate unfairly the outcome of any election. Properties which will be directly benef itted by the proposed improvements have been eliminated from the District solely because they are residential in nature or include registered voters that would vote against this proposal and any council candidate supportive of it. Knowing that a city wide election or an election with a large portion of homeowners would fail, the city has created boundary lines which fail to include the significant areas of the city which will benefit from this massive level of public improvements, apparently only to satisfy the three major property owners that require the public improvements in order to construct their private improvements. The manner in which benefit is assessed is inconsistent with proper benefit assessment practice. For example, the Pierotti family property, which does not require these public improvements in order to develop their land, is required to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars which flow directly to the benefit of three major landowners. These landowners have proposals pending before the city that will generate sufficient O LIVER, STOEVER, BgRR & VOSE The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of Rancho Cucamonga November 4, 1991 Page 3. local taxes to pay for the construction of these public improvements without the necessity of the proposed District. The Pierotti family, along with other property owners, are included in the proposed district only to help soften the financial burden to these speculative developers. This proposed district will decrease the lanfl value of our client's property (due to the unreasonable assessment burden) and place a severe economic hardship upon non-developing landowners. Clearly, the intent must be to force our clients to sell their property at a discounted price or reduce market value in anticipation of possible condemnation for Redevelopment purposes. It is respectfully requested that the City Council reconsider its commitment to proceed with this proposed district and require the speculative development to proceed and finance their infrastructure improvements without including non-participating property owners. The size of this bond issue will have a severe impact upon the bonding capacity of the city of Rancho Cucamonga and its standing as a progressive local government. Thank you for your consideration and we are available to discuss alternatives to the Community Facilities District No. 91-1 at your convenience. Very truly yours, ~~~ Charles S. Voss of OLIVER, STOEVER, BARB & VOSE cSV:ilf 6593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM GATE: November 6, 1991 To: Mayor and Members of the Cit/y^\C/~ou~ncil FROM: Jan Sutton, Deputy Ciiy C1ekk ,~J.~~" SVEJECT: I_TEH D14 ON CONSENT CALENDAR This memo Se to advise that the Engineering Department is requesting the contract for the Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project be awarded to R.G. Conetru ction ae stated in the et off report, and not to R.E.C. Construction ae shown in Lhe title for this item. I apologize Eor any confusion thta may have caueetl you. /m AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS.INC. Navemher 6, 1991 F:onorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Drainage Henefit Aeeeasment Aree 91-2 City Council Agenda Ztam P-3 :.adies and Gentlemen Ahmanson/SUmitomo i and watt Inland are the only property owners within the boundaries of the referenced Drainage Henef ii Assessment Area. We have reviewed the Engineer's Report prepared by Willdan Asscciates and agree with the assessment schedule and method of cost spread. Our approval has been indicated on previously submitted "Landowner Petition and Consent to Benefit Assessment" farms, Approval of City Council Resolution No. 91-331 adopting the Benefit Assessments is respectfully requested. Very truly yours, Ahmanson/SUmitomo i Watt Inland Empire, Inc. 6y ^Ahmars on Developments, Inc. Craig ge ~ rry ewis Vice President ._. Dix or of Development CP:slm I is ~.tim uh V1J L~, l i.in prn ~.. Snu~~ Inn • buw nand Ii.u . i .i lion m,i ail 5e', ~'~lu • Ai ~,,,i r~,d~~ i i I Iwa~', li n i Lewis Homes Management Corp. li5fi N"nh Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Uplvd. Cilifomi~ 917835008 714ry85-0971 FAX: 714ry49~6700 October 31, 1991 Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civlc Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Multi-Family Design Standards - ..~;,?3j 1991 Dear Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council: Since April, 1991, Lewis Homes has participated in a joint effort by the private sector, City staff and the Planning Commission to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide our input. The results of this very exhaustive and detailed analysis are now before you for your consideration. We support the proposal/recommendation and complement staff and the Planning Commission far their efforts. There is, however, a procedural issue regarding implementation of the new standards that warrants a "policy clarification": Staff has consistently stated that the new standards would not be applied to projects that have been previously approved-- i.e., with Tentative Tract Map and Design Review approvals. However, it's been suggested that if extensions of approvals are requested, then some or all of the new standards may be applied. We have a number of projects in Terra Vista that fall into this category (see attached, Fxhibit "A"). The potential confusion lies in the different developer action(s) required to toll the expiration of a Tentative Tract Map (recording the map) as compared to tolling the expiration of a Design Review approval (pulling building permits). We understand that getting the Tentative Tract Map recorded only takes care of the map itself, whereas the Design Review approval could "technically" be considered to have expired if building permits have not been obtained, even if the Tract Map has recorded! Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members of the City Council October 31, 1991 Page 2 We are confident that it was never the intent to enforce such a forfeiture of rights where the developer has shown good faith (and a very significant economic commitment) by posting bonds and recording the Tract Map. Nevertheless, this technical inconsistency, in theory, could cause some confusion-- especially in the "slow market" environment we are now experiencing. We are simply asking that the Council clarify the intended application of the new Multi-Family Design Standards so it is clear that timely recordation of a Tract Map would toll the expiration of the Design Review approval as well as the Tentative Map approval. (This would, of course, not apply where a developer seeks voluntarily to amend a Design Review approval by significantly redesigning a project. In that case, application of the new standards would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission). We have solicited and received staff support for this clarification. Thank you for your considerakion. LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. i ~ i~/, Josetbh M. Oleson ~ Vice President Senior Project Manager ,IMO: ksk cc: Rick Gomez Brad Buller _a psi '-m 9 ~ ~~ 8 __ 3 ~ $ e < D o ~€ ~q ~ ~ o~ mm 3 i n ~'y m~ o"' ~ m "' i . m -'~ F ,F on y<yn A ~3 t~ s ' m o ~x .a Y~ r>~m sms ~a ~~ '• g _N Lam' N @ Q N @ ~ $ ~ a [ ~ N 8 r $ o e r ~ 9 >O 9 N '~, N NN ; N ! vz ti m ~~ a~ pN N (~11 N N yHy o N H 3 ~ ~ a ) I fl r m m s; Q N ~ N app W Z N ~ N a~ A yms TOy m T O a L Y u~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ s O y O e~ ^, l Lewis Homes Management Corp. '~ 1156 No,m Mowtav, Avrnue / P.O. Box 670 / Up1aM. CdJonu~ 91785-5008 , ~j 71dN85~0971 FAX: 714N49~6700 P'p`T%~~ [t ~,ti October 31, 1991 ~- ~/ 3 1 1981 a:, . ~~~: Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Multi-Family Design Standards Dear Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council: Since April, 1991, Lewis Homes has participated in a joint effort by the private sector, City staff and the Planning Commission to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide our input. The results of this very exhaustive and detailed analysis are now before you for your consideration. We support the proposal/recommendation and complement staff and the Planning Commission for their efforts. There is, however, a procedural issue regarding implementation of the new standards that warrants a "policy clarification": Staff has consistently stated that the new standards would not be applied to projects that have been previously approved-- i.e., with Tentative Tract Map and Design Review approvals. However, it's been suggested that if extensions of approvals are requested, then some or all of the new standards may be applied. We have a number of projects in Terra Vista that fall into this category (see attached, Exhibit "A"). The potential confusion lies in the different developer action(s) required to toll the expiration of a Tentative Tract Map (recording the map) as compared to tolling the expiration of a Design Review approval (pulling building permits). We understand that getting the Tentative Tract Map recorded only takes care of the map itself, whereas the Design Review approval could "technically" be considered to nave expired if building permits have not been obtained, even if the Tract Map has recorded! Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members of the City Council October 31, 1991 Page 2 We are confident that it was never the intent to enforce such a forfeiture of rights where the developer has shown good faith (and a very significant economic commitment) by posting bonds and recording the Tract Map. Nevertheless, this technical inconsistency, in theory, could cause same confusion-- especially In the "slow market" environment we are now experiencing. We are simply asking that the Council clarify the intended application of the new Multi-Family Design Standards so it is clear that timely recordation oP a Tract Map would toll the expiration of the Design Review approval as well as the Tentative Map approval. (This would, of course, not apply where a developer seeks voluntarily to amend a Design Review approval by significantly redesigning a project. In that case, application of the new standards would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission). We have solicited and received staff support for this clarification. Thank you for your consideration. I.EWZS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. /~ J i1 Jose h M: Oleson ~ Vice~President Senior Project Manager JMO:ksk cc: Rick Gomez Brad Buller P P P. P ~I _ ~ 3 8 '• ~ s i . g° m '~~ 3 m om S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m$ 3 i ~ s ~ H ~ R~ m z _o s -1 u _~ o m c~ ~ L " ~~ m g~ s > y a mC z ppyy 7y '~ yy 7u gg ruug mum ~$ mS 'mom P8 2lm ° ~ ~'=8 wa c r r L r 6i ~. 9 n N ~" @@ E N a ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ T T m s ; s 9 'p, N NN ,N = S < Vl z T ~ ~ -Ti ~ C ; 9 m q - T ! T > ; ~ 9L ¢ a ~ y L - r > > ti m N y y D T > Z ~ T < ti 8 t_L = ~ ~ O T N ~ ~ ~ N N y m 9 a a A ~ y$ gg i ~ s~ D~ 4 4~ gg y'~ ~ S ~S ~S ~~ ~~