HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/07/22 - Agenda Packet - Adjournedcrry or
RANCHO CUCANIONU.A
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Adjourned Meeting - 6 :30 p.m.
Thursday, July 22, 1982
j
1. CALL TO ORDEF.
a. Roll Call: Dahl, Buquet_, Schlosser_, Frost_, Mikels_
2. ITEMS OF BUSINESS.
A. Rues[ for Funding - Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce.
B. Revisions to 1982 -83 Program of Service.
C. Request for Funding - Chaffey Humane Society.
D. Set Public Hearing for Resolution of Necessity - possible acquisition
of right -of -way easement for flood control purposes.
E. Article 8 Claim /Transportation Funds for Fiscal Year 1982 -83.
F. Approval of Spending Limitations for 1982 -83.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE. XIIIB
OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION.
G. Adoption of 1982 -83 Program of Service.
3. ADJOURNMENT.
hone and associates, inc.
July 22,1982
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O.Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attn: city Council c/o Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
Subject: The Rancho Cuaw=ga Chamber of Ctmmece request for city support, $25,000. Of
Gentebman:
The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, in my opinion, will not solve
its problems by accepting $25,000.00, or any other sum of noney,frcm The City
of Rancho Cucamonga. You do net solve problems by throwing money at then, you
just simply perpetuate then.
My feeling is that the chamber has a very capable group of citizens Serving
as its board of directors, and that our new president has the capability to guide
the chamber down a positive path.
may I suggest that the respective sttafflIs of the city and chamber be
ouraged,once age ,to meet and confer, u�g�dirmg specific services and events
that financial assistance from the cit��''y��`` cDuld support. Upon "Mutual Agreement'
being obtained, then this matter could be scheduled for public hearing.
Sincerely yours,
i
cc;The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Cwnerce
J
r,mv / V n ANT r Vn rlTr nMnMre
STAFF REPORT�°46t
"c'n
z I 2F: 2
U" D
July 22, 1982 19 %7 1
TO: City Manager
Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager
RE: ARTICLE 8 CLAIM -- TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR '82 -'83
Each year the City Council must authorize the City Manager to sign the
attached Article 3 claim in order to receive our Transportation
Development Act funds for streets and roads construction. These are
restricted funds and can be only used for these purposes. For
Fiscal Year 1982 -83, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive $778,301.00
in Transporation Development Act Funds. Of this amount $118,829.00 would
be claimed directly by Ornitrans to continue our existing level of transit
services. This amount claimed by Omnitrans will provide for the con-
tinuation of Route 60, one general purpose dial -a -ride sedan and the
city's share of the cost to operate lift equipped vans for the handicapped
in the West End of San Bernardino County. Currently the cost to operate
the lift equipped van is shared between the five cities in the West End
as well as the County of San Bernardino.
The remaining T.D.A. funds in the amount of $659,472.00 must be utilized
for street and road purposes in the City. Generally speaking, the
Transporation Development Act Funds represent the largest single source
of revenue forstreets and roads purposes in the City.
RECOMMENDATION: 1. The City Council authorize the City Manager to
sign the attached Article 8 claim.
2. The City Council adopt, by minute action, authorizing
the following distribution of T.D.A. funds for
Fiscal Year 1982 -33
A. Omnitrans $118,829.00
B. City of Rancho
Cucamon a $659 472.00
ota 778,30 .00
JHR /vz
Attachment
TDA SPREAD
1982 -83
FINAL
TOTAL ARTICLE BALANCE
AGENCY APPORTIONMENT 4 ARTICLE 8
TOTAL 12,717,335
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
TDA NON- TRANSIT CLAIM FORM
FISCAL YEAR:
DATE:
1982 -83
7 -22 -82
CLAIMANT:
PAYMENT RECIPIENT:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
COUNTY LTF:
(Claimant)
P.O. Box 807
PURPOSE: (Check one box only)
(Mailing Address)
( ) Article 3, PUC Section 99234
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
(City and Zip Code)
( ) Article 8, PUC Section 99400a
Local Streets and Roads
Harry Empey, Finance Director
( ) Article 8 PUC Section 99400a
(Attention -Name and Title)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
(714)989 -1851
(contact person - phone number)
DETAIL OF REQUESTED ALLOCATION:
AMOUNT
1. Payment from Unallocated Funds
2. Payment from Reserves (Drawdown of
funds reserved in a previous year)
3. Total Allocation Requested
$659,472.00
4. IA Planning Contribution to IVAG
or VCAG (Imperial 8 Ventura only)
S. .3A Planning Contribution to SCAG
(Imperial and Ventura only)
CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Approval of
AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE(CLAIMANT'S
this claim and payment by the County
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OR FINANCIAL
Auditor to this claimant are subject
OFFICER)
to monies being available, and to the
provision that such monies will be
Signature
used only in accordance with the
allocation instructions.
Lauren M. Wasserman Cit hlana er
Print Name and Tit e
LIU we UNLr
1. DATE APPROVED
2. SIGNED:
SCAG USE ONLY
1. CLAIM NO.
2. DATE APPROVED
3. ALLOCATION NUMBER
4. BY:
SCAG -TDA (3/82)
TDA SPREAD
1982 -83
FINAL
BALANCE
TOTAL ARTICLE ARTICLE 8
APPORTIONMENT
4
12,711,jj=
TOTAL
SPENDING LIMITATION CALCULATION
1982 - 1983
Spending Limitation for 1981 - 1982 $8,242,878*
Factors for determining 1982 -83 Spending Limitation
% Population - 4.29%
% C.P.I. = 6.79%
Ratio of Change = 1.0429 x 1.0679 = 1.1137%
Convert to a Percentage = (1.1137 x 100) - 100 - 11,37%
Spending Limitation Calculation for 1982 - 1983
Spending Limitation for 1982 -83 - $8,242,878
Ratio % Population to % C.Y.I. 11.37%
8,242,878 x 111.37% _ $9,180,093
Spending Limitation for 1982 -1983 $9,180,093
* See 1981 -1982 Budget for Calculations to this point.
SPENDING LIMITATION CALCULATIONS
1981 -1982
1979 -1980
PCI Change: 10.17% or 1.1017
Population Change: 9.94% or 1.0994
1.1017 x 1.0994 = 1.211 (C)
1980 -1981
PCI Change: 12.11% or 1.1211
Population Change: 12.70% or 1.1270
1.1211 x 1.1270 = 1.2635 (F)
1980 -1981 Limit
C x F - G
1.211 x 1.2635 - 1.53 (G) (two year ratio of change)
1981 -1982 Limit
PCI Change: 9.12% or 1.0912
Population Change: 4.93% or 1.0493 (.T)
1.0912 x 1.0493 = 1.145 (K)
C x K - L: (1.53)(1.145) = 1.752 (L)
Convert to a percent: (1.752 x 100) - 100 = 75.2%
Cumulative Growth Rate Over 1978 -1979 Appropriations
4,704,839 x 175.2 = 8,242,878
W
RESOLUTION NO. Q a- I it.`•'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION.
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides
that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State
and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit
of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in
the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said
article XIIIB; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said article XIIIB of the Constitution of
the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
establish an appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1982 -1983; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
has determined that said appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1982-
1983 be established in the amount of $9,180,093.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga that an appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1982-
1983 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of Calif-
ornia be established in the amount of $9,180,093, and the same is hereby
established.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein
established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the
City Council.
THE FORGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this day of
1982.
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
/
QTY OF
RANCHO CIJGXAIONGA
CITY CC► NCIL
g a
AGE NEA
1977
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Adjourned Meeting - Budget
Thursday, July 22, 1982 - 6:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
a. Roll Call: Dahl_, Buquet_, Schlosser_, Frost_, Mikels_
2. ITEMS OF BUSINESS.
A. REOUEST FOR FUNDING - RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
B. REVISIONS TO 1982 -83 PROGRAM OF SERVICE.
C. REQUEST FOR FUNDING - CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY.
D. ADOPTION OF 1982 -83 PROGRAM OF SERVICE.
3. ADJOURNMENT.
nrm,� nn n � wrnvn nrtn w n2 nw,n n
As the City Council is aware, the Chamber of Commerce has requested a
$25,000 budgetary appropriation from the City in order to augment various
Chamber programs which are considered to be of service to the City.
The City Council instructed the staff to meet with the staff of the
Chamber to discuss in greater detail the Chamber budget and the request
for financial assistance. We have met the president and the Chamber
manager and we have been unable to agree on a final figure. The Chamber
representatives feel that the $25,000 request is fully justifiable. The
city staff recognizes the importance of the Chamber of Commerce. However,
we cannot recommend full funding when we have, in effect, eliminated
five employees from our budget, and we have not adequately funded essen-
tial services such as street sweeping, parkway maintenance, street
maintenance and park acquisition and development. We also have not been
financially capable of increasing the sheriff's department service, even
though an increase in service levels would be highly desirable.
It is significant to point out that the value of the Chamber of Commerce
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not at issue. The Chamber offers
many services which, if not provided through the public sector, must be
handled by the City, sometimes at greater cost. However, on the other
hand, the Chamber must consider the degree to which it wishes to be
obligated to the City in exchange for public assistance.
It is the staff's role, to view every budgetary request within the
context of the overall city budget. Nearly every program has merit.
However, because of the limited city resources we are usually unable to
fully fund each program at the optimum level desired. This is also the
case with the Chamber of Commerce, in our view.
Since staff does not recommend the full $25,000 funding, it is recommended
that in exchange for services by the Chamber of Commerce which also
benefit the City, some City funding be approved. The value of the
Chamber of Commerce to the City is in many instances intangible. There-
fore, staff has assumed that the City Council is fully aware of both the
obvious and the intangible benefits the Chamber provides to the City.
STAFF REPORT
�.,
��° ,
DATE:
July 21, 1982
�F
c ": c
TO:
City Council
j
u i
FROM:
Lauren M. Wasserman,
City Manager —
1977
SUBJECT:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
As the City Council is aware, the Chamber of Commerce has requested a
$25,000 budgetary appropriation from the City in order to augment various
Chamber programs which are considered to be of service to the City.
The City Council instructed the staff to meet with the staff of the
Chamber to discuss in greater detail the Chamber budget and the request
for financial assistance. We have met the president and the Chamber
manager and we have been unable to agree on a final figure. The Chamber
representatives feel that the $25,000 request is fully justifiable. The
city staff recognizes the importance of the Chamber of Commerce. However,
we cannot recommend full funding when we have, in effect, eliminated
five employees from our budget, and we have not adequately funded essen-
tial services such as street sweeping, parkway maintenance, street
maintenance and park acquisition and development. We also have not been
financially capable of increasing the sheriff's department service, even
though an increase in service levels would be highly desirable.
It is significant to point out that the value of the Chamber of Commerce
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not at issue. The Chamber offers
many services which, if not provided through the public sector, must be
handled by the City, sometimes at greater cost. However, on the other
hand, the Chamber must consider the degree to which it wishes to be
obligated to the City in exchange for public assistance.
It is the staff's role, to view every budgetary request within the
context of the overall city budget. Nearly every program has merit.
However, because of the limited city resources we are usually unable to
fully fund each program at the optimum level desired. This is also the
case with the Chamber of Commerce, in our view.
Since staff does not recommend the full $25,000 funding, it is recommended
that in exchange for services by the Chamber of Commerce which also
benefit the City, some City funding be approved. The value of the
Chamber of Commerce to the City is in many instances intangible. There-
fore, staff has assumed that the City Council is fully aware of both the
obvious and the intangible benefits the Chamber provides to the City.
Chamber of Commerce Request for Financial Assistance
City Council Agenda
July 21, 1982
Page 2
Staff Proposal
It is recommended that the City enter into an agreement to be drafted by
the City Attorney. It is proposed that the agreement incl the following
provisjons:
0,0t, 1. The agreement shall be limited to a 12 month period. 174
'12. Paym is to th Cha r shall a made,pn a monthly basi��y7gj
pori" sha prepared by the Chamber and
presented at City Council meetings. These reports shall
.indicate a summary of Chamber activities during the pre-
vious three month period.
✓ 5
1//6
7.
J 8.
9.
Chamber financial records shall be available to the City
or its auditors for inspection in order to verify expendi-
tures of City funds.
The Chamber shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act re-
quirement for open meetings,
City allocated money may not be utilized for debts in-
curred prior to
�.9 o �- ,
The Chamber shall provide a position on the Board of
Directors for an ex- officio liason member to AZpo,,nted
by the City Council from its own membership.
City supported expenditures shall be restricted to Council
approved projects or programs. Funds may be used only for
the purpose delineated in the agreement between the City
and the Chamber.
Other items as suggested by the City Attorney or members
of the City Council.
It is recommended that the City assist the Chamber of Commerce by providing
funding for the following:
1. Rent of office facilities - $5,040.00 4$k I
2. Liability and Property Insurance - $2,000.00 4" i
3. Utilities - $3,600.00
Total 10,640.00
Chamber of Commerce Request for financial Assistance
City Council Agenda
July 21, 1982
Page 3
If the City Council wishes to provide additional funding for the Chamber
there are other specific projects which could be funded by the City:
Economic Development Conference - $3,000
The Chamber is proposing to establish this as a new program by
breaking away from the County's annual economic development
conference. The new proposal is for a west -end conference.
Prior to any commitment, however, the Council should review
a detailed budget which shows both expenditures and revenues
from this project.d�(,,�,(�„�,,,,�, a..
Promotion and Advertising - $1,200
This account is to pay for various types of ads which are run
to publicize the City and /or Chamber of Commerce. If this
activity is funded by the City, the staff and City Council
should review all materials prior to publication.
Equipment Rental - $3,800
This is for rental of copy machines, computer equipment and
typewriters.
Bookkeeper/Typist - $7,800
This is a proposed new position which is included in the
Chamber budget which has been submitted to the City Council.
Pay Cost of Providin hn ledical Insurance for Full -Time Chamber
npl_�__Z - 2,400
The 'haviber could participate in the City health insurance
Program to provide better coverage at a lesser cost.
Miss Rancho Cucamonga Beauty Pageant - $1,200
1R (fW , Q
This activity has been an annual program. poroved jby, 7thee Chamber
for the past several years. Prior to considering funding of this
activity, the City should receive a complete analysis of both
expenditures and revenues from this project.
In summary, the importance of the Chamber of Commerce to the community
is beyond question. The staff, and ultimately the City Council, must
balance the needs of the Chamber with the needs of other special interest
groups as well as the requirements of all city departments. The City's
financial condition is critical. The above recommendation takes into
account the overall budgetary needs of the City.
The DAILY REPORT, Thum., June 4, 1981 11
CrIe is n® money
from "My E
By STEVE STANDERFER
Staff Writer
A financially troubled Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commence
sought a contract with the city
Wednesday night in order to prevent
a projected $24.000 deficit.
But the request was rejected by a
4 -1 rote of the City Council.
Councilmen sand they realized the
"(NM for a chamber of commerce
but, they slressN, the cite is facing
its men Imanaal uncertainty N the
ommng Dead year.
Councilmen also said city
government and lhechambershould
remain independent of each other
and a contract could jeopardize that
separation
The cnunchl heard from chamber
off oials before making the decision.
Itepreaentabves stressed the need
Lx a strung chamber to help the gay
develop
Dr Salazar, a chamber director,
hold the "onctl that without proper
fundmg a chamber of commerce is
undfhctrve "Every great city—has
a great slumber," said Salazar,
"We're in dire need of funds at
this hoc "Lnok at (lhe contract) as
a loan," Salazar urge)
Another repres ritaln'e said the
chaMN'r nrcds money in order to
even "function as something that
vaguely resembles" a chamber of
commhrce,
The council was also given
information from the chamber
showing how area cities support
their local chambers with contracts
Chamber represenUirves pointed
out that rtancho Cucamonga is the
only city in the area that doear't
support the chamber of commerce
through a contract.
Annual contract amounts range
from $12.000 in Chino to M.000 in
Ontaren The proportion of chamber
budgets derived from city contracts
ranged from 20 percent in China to
97 percent in Montclair, which has a
Sht(W contract according to the
report.
Officials stressed that they only
wanted the 824.000 contract for the
content fiscal year.
Councilman Jon Mikels suggested
that a committee be formed with
two council members to smdv
"prejects that may be jointly
beneficial" to the city and the
chamber.
Art Bridge, councilman and
lifelong resident of Rancho
Cucamonga, said he has been
Involved in the chamber since it
began and he supports it as a
mymber
But, fm "philosophical reasons,"
Bridge said he couldn't support the
contract idea.
Be explained that alttaugh the
city and chamber work Inwards
same common goats, using city
foods to help itp chamber may
upset the balance that exists
because the chamber acts as a
watchdog over the city.
Bridge said there may be
struggling, but the chamber will be
stranger for it.
Szlarar stressed again that the
chamber was not asking for a "gift"
of financial help, but merely asking
for pavment for services It renders
to Rancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Phil Schlosser, the former
chamber president, also attacked
the idea of a contract. Schlosser said
he took money out of his own pocket
to pay for chamber off ice expenses
at times.
^1f you don't get (the macyI in,
then somehow you've got to cut
expenses," SChI MSer said.
Councilman Jim Frost also agreed
with Schlosser and Bridge.
Councilman Mike Palumbo was
the only one to vote agabrst denying
the contract proposal.
MikeLs and Palumbo agreed to
represent the council in meeting
with chamber ofhef ils to work out a
solution.
The chamber's executive
director, Michael Jauron, said that
meetings will have to be held to
decide on what will have to be done
Neither Sala., or Jaumn could
understand some of the commmts
made by the council, they said,
especiallY in regard to the
rehatonship between the council and
chamber,
"R'e both pull on the same rope in
the same direction," Jauroo sold.
Claye-rinont bails ®apt- chamber
BY N'OVSE ROBERTSON
Staff Writer
The C :nrement City Council Tuesday unanimously
vi oils 1).o t, ••t ' n f the Ct ".omen,
1'!it^^'rrCC h!I[ fIJ(I`rf^ 1 anC rl^e'<IOn nrl
uvni n -e l'" 9 "a[ unnl.la n• 9].
llo'.l men e discussing the hedges for 198283,
council t an the construction the audience some Citizens
an the cons:rudion of Senior Citizens
Conti in I:arkin Park.
P'layd Ethrl,,ie, president of the Chamber of
Comnarcm, said he had not previously asked for
funds front the city, hoping the chamber's budget
couLl Le met w'ithent coy assistance.
-Vicll !se broke and out of business on Aug. I
mil'.r,ut help." Ethridge told the council.
C'Uun „s the past several guars. we have had an
If'ror o of i?a,0,vi and eppuoe%: of beh\cen G30,01M1
and S4aj,;Il.” lie expleimd. "New' duce are not
commr in fainter members are \ther not
q �•r jre p,5jalf into Per:mas r:..r„ hay he:•n
one nusinuroi mont In the pasC few years. The
crmomy also is a factor.
� ..
thndge aLxn asked for $10,0 :0 durn,, the next
fiscal your for special projects. The council will
canceler ta:.:t rcq'.mst an July 37
Ownrahnan Owdun Curds said file d.arrber is a
vaLd n,ut ei :!,., cnc::n:mity whrh In ^n fn; V.110%. '
"II., :.f..ro :, Lea ;u\I rtfer:'al p: o.',ran n'.'.t :d',rid
the chi miler .\:c, partly iasU'unwad:A in brim4',n,d
were rinp ?r rnmrnarer•i d „\ehrpment to the city,'
noted f'e:meilm :m Sheldon W,:lims.
Tl:u city will also try M find a lortion for the
ehanilser elfice, ('u' MaInuger [An Wood anted. The
aid fare station nest to the City [fall Is a possibility,
he added.
A mayor stumbinig block on rIlntummg with plans
for (lie senior center, council members said, Is
concern ricer maintaining programs and services if
government fumhnu of the nutrition and other
programs Is 'withdrawn In the future.
Jne Knuth. a former city romnusswner, charred
that the council "s breaking faith with the wizens”
by not continuing with plans for the center.
Franklin Scott of Claremont said: "Many people
understood that funds were promised and a $100.1100
foundation grant was secured by the seniors to assist
in the program."
Scott said he felt the building could be maintained
in some method, adding "the citizens will help out."
A member of the Committee on Aging, Philip
Dreyer stated that the council has not been sensitive
to the needs of the senior citizen.
'•The city has been cooperative to a degree, but
most of the progress so far has been through private
citizen committees," noted Dreyer.
' we haven't had good leadership," he added.
"The council has been conclave, instead of active."
City staff member Betty Rose explained that basic
& nnos in the funding of nutrition and other senior
service proginnis can he anticipi,ed. She predicted
soma reduction in government funding in the next
rear.
Wolims arlda•'I: •'The need for the molds program
may increase if federal funding In reduced. It's less
expensive to cook meals in large qualities than for
une Jerson to rook. These meal.; map be even more
viii.
"ht addition, the present location in Memorial
Park is not conducive to a si UefaNOry program.
Rm.. I'm .turtin:; to feel the blul,hng makes sense,"
9aelho; mc.!. !
Counc ixonl.m Eleanor Callen ; skrJ the the cost
of bmngm< to ohms to a point where bids count be
secured be avad,able at the next council meeting.
' Funds have been set aside for several years
toward the censtrucbon of a senior citiaen center to
replace a center in Memorial Park which was
condemned as unsafe. In addition, i1W,000 has been
pledged by the Juslyn Fomldatmn to ;add rooms to the
building.
The proposed budget presented by city staff is for
310,871.181, which is 13 percent less than the 1981-63
budget of over 112 million.
It includes a reduction of three staff members
bringing; the total from the present 177 to 144.
NjanAo ltucamoTa
Itgamb¢r Of �omm¢rc¢
Ym Enter_pris¢'�ax�sty
'IWe t� lam
k(7_ncho Cacarnoa Chamber o` Commerce
8137 MALACHITE AVE, SUITE A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA 91730
TELEPHONE: 714,9371012
June 9, 19E2
TO: Merbers of City Council, City Manager
FRO:!: President, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce '
RE: Ne cotiating Letter between City and Chamber of Co, -rerce
Cen t l Caen :
There has been much discussion particularly in the past few months both
infoncally and in public sessions discussing the need for the City and
Charber of Co:nmcrce to work cooperatively together and for the City to be
supportive of the Chamber. City Staff has been very generous with their
professional and personal time, and the Chamber continues to be grateful
for this cooperation.
It is true that much of the activity of the Chamber relates directly
to the benefit of the City and only indirectly, and in the future, benefits
the Charbar. Much of the effort of enticing new industry and investors into
the area represents functions that would, in the absence of a char:ber,
necessarily be handled by the City and /or its redevelopment agency. In
our city, less than 50 percent built and with great future potential, this
Clurber spends perhaps much more of its time in this economic develop: -=_nt
area than other chambers in more fully built cities. While much of our
planning and recruiting effort has been paid directly by the involved real
estate developers, fully one -third (approximately $25,000) of our annual
operitinj bud- -.nt is spent on the effort to improve the economic health of
the City. An example of the activities of the Chamber in this past year
is attached and perhaps begins to indicate that a major effort is being
spent on behalf of the City.
We realize that the City budget is extraordinarily tight, but so is the
Char,her's. Slhtle bath institutions are non - profit organizations, neither
one can run in the red without cutting back services. Since the resources
of the City and its redevelop,:�ent agency are comparatively greater than
the Chamber's, we du request that the City or its redevelopment agency enter
into a servic, contract, with the Chamber similar to those in force in several
of our neight;oring cities. We will be happy to distribute copies of said
a;r uements.
We V:nca the City is besieged with many worthwhile requests, however, the
Char�ber's roqunst perhaps can be uniquely filled - it is quite defendable,
for instance, to propose that since the Charber has been spendinq r.oney on
behalf of the objectives of the redevelopment agency that the redevelopment
agency, in turn, finance this effort, to be repaid through the increased
valuation caused, in part, by the Chamber's activities. We realize it's
-2-
unwise to burden the agency with unnecessary debts, but we propose that
our request is actually a needed investment for the future.
F'embers of the Board of the Chamber, its Staff and we look forward to
the opportunity to happily conclude this matter
Respectfully, !/ v _
Don Hardy
Out-Going President
Bob Salazar
In- Coming President
1,ancho Cucamoy Cham5cr of Commerce
r
8137 MALACHITE AVE., SUITE A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
TELEPHONE: 7141987 -1012
June 9, 1982
The following is a partial list of major activities and accomplishments
directly related to the economic and sociological health of Rancho Cucamonga.
The majority are of only indirect or potential benefit to Chamber members.
(Direct member service is the prime responsibility of any chamber.)
Since July 1, 1981:
Formation of the Baldy View Public /Private Coalition
Foreign investors tour
Production of Community Factbook
Production of Community Economic Profile
Constant updating of numerous lists of community resources, organizations and
personalities
"Hawaii 'Week ", a city wide retail promotion
"IXPACT "...District Attorney Kottmeier's crime prevention program
Maintained a tourist and visitors information center
Ongoing advertising and community promotion campaign (six local newspaper
tabloids, plus coverage in: L.A. area press, national and international
magazines, foreign press, city newsletters, and in -house newsletter)
Production of Wine Festival and Carnival
Production of Miss Rancho Cucamonga Pageant
FFPD /CCfD Candidates Forum
Industrial Specific Plan consultation and workshops
Assess: :ent District consultation and workshops
Redeveloprwnt Agency consultation and workshops
Industrial Bonding Authority consultation
Establishu•d Ambassador Corps for entire Rancho Cucamonga community
Chaffey College 99th Anniversary Liaison
Etiwanda Centennial Liaison
Co ,)rdinc.led with neighboring comumunities: parades, workshops, seminars etc.
Sponsored six business - practices seminars
OrCinance evaluation, review and consulting
City Candidates Forum
In roea'.i::;:•n to p;n-cha,e. tor:; uter to estahlish cnm.,ur.ity data -base
Spring Clean Sweep Campaign
Co:,:nunity I•,ralth Fair
Opportunity '82 Economic Outlook Conference
Outlook '32 special edition: Daily Report /Progress Bulletin
Ansnered ,,; :111roxisnately 400 mail inquires about the Rancho Cucamonga community
;.n Srn: r�•r1 •spproximitely 3600 phone inquires about the Rancho Cucamonga conmunity.
?�,ancho Cucamo�a Chamber of Commerce
8137 MALACHITE AVE., SUITE A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
TELEPHONE: 7141987.1012
June 28, 1982
T0: The Honorable Members of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga
and the City Manager
FR0M: Robert Salazar, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce
RE: Proposed Operating Budget, 1982 -83 Fiscal Year
Honorable Gentlemen:
Attached, please find the proposed budget of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber
of Commerce for the 1982 -83 fiscal year. This document has been prepared
through collaboration between the Chamber's Treasurer, Accountant, administrator,
and Executive Committee, in accordance with the Chamber's By -Laws.
The projected amounts of revenues and expenses are within 5" of the actual
amounts recorded in the 1981 -82 fiscal period (which included significant
one -time -only bail -out donations from Chamber members and a loan from the
City itself, which kept the Chamber viable last year). The most significant
difference between this proposed budget and last year's figures is the
substitution of 525,000 anticipated from a contract with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for services rendered to the community by the Rancho Cucamonga
Chamber of Couimerce,in lieu of the one- time -only donations.
Therefore, the Chamber requests the sum of $25,000 from the City under
mutually agreeable terms that will benefit all Rancho Cucamonga citizens.
Sincerely,
Bob Salazar, President
GS: hp
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PROPOSED FINANCIAL BUDGET
FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 1982 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1983
REVENUES:
Gross Dues: (currently 550 members, drop rate
net 430 X $115 average)
New Members: (add rate is 15 per /month... net
Factbook Advertising Commission
Map Advertising Commission
Printed Material (net)
Newsletter Advertising
Special Events (net)
City Contract
is 10 per month...
$ 49,450
180 X $115 average) 20,700
2,000
1,000
1,000
1,850
6,500
25,000
TOTAL REVENUE: ........................... ............................... $107,500
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Bank Charges
(8.33 X 12)
100
Interest
(20 X 12)
240
Flowers and Awards
(20 X 12)
240
Institute (Staff Education)
(33.33 X 12)
400
Dues and Subscriptions
(50 X 12)
600
Insurance (Fixtures and Liability)
(166.66 X 12)
2,000
Insurance (Staff - Group)
(200 X 12)
2,400
Manager's Expenses
(115 X 12)
1,380
Manager's Auto Expense
(150 X 12)
1,800
Membership Promotion
(800 X 12)
9,600
Office Supplies
(250 X 12)
3,000
Outside Services
(75 X 12)
900
Postage
(250 X 12)
3,000
Printing
(275 X 12)
3,300
Promotion and Advertising
(100 X 12)
1,200
Rent
(420 X 12)
5,040
Salary, Manager
(2083.33 X 12)
25,000
Salaries, Manager's Staff
(2458.33 X 12)
29,500
Taxes, Payroll
(454.17 X 12)
5,450
Travel and Convention
(58.33 X 12)
700
Telephone
(216.66 X 12)
2,600
Utilities
(83.33 X 12)
11000
Equipment Rental C.- wL.- tsoj».
(320.83 X 12)
3,850
uw749%/Economic Outlook Conference
3,000
Miss Rancho Cucamonga Pageant
_
11200
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES: ................. ............................... $107,500
SPECIAL EVENTS: Net (less costs, taxes
Mixers
Programs, Seminars
Wine Festival
Golf Tournament
Coupon Sales
Banquet
license administration fees)
$2,000
750
1,875
950
750
175
$6,500
Current Staff 1981 -82 Fiscal Year
A. Administration
1. Two full time
2. One part time - 30 hrs /week
3. One CETA trainee 10 hrs /week
B. Sales
1. Two part -time - 10 -20 hrs /week each
C. Volunteers (variable and unschedulable)
II. Proposed Staff and Salary Breakdown for 1982 -83 Fiscal Year
l.) Executive Director (salary) $25,000 annually
2.) Office Manager /Administrative Assistant (salary) $14,400 annually
3.) Bookkeepter /Typist (hourly) $7,800 annually ($5.00 /hr. - 30 hrs. /wk.)
(a proposed new position on the staff)
4.) Receptionist /General Office (hourly) $7,020 annually ($4.50 /hr. - 30 hrs. /wk
5.) CETA Clerical Trainee - up to 20 hrs. /wk.
no cost to Chamber except training and supervision time
6.) Membership Sales (commission only)
(two part -time positions)
7.) Volunteer Staff
a. variable and unschedulable
b. no cost except training and supervision time
ITTTlr nc n A atn Lin OT TO A TAnVO A
STAFF REPORT
July 19, 1982 �, r
OII t
F!I Q 7
U` 1977
1977
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
SUBJECT: Reduction of State Subven ons
We are pleased to report that the State did not reduce subventions to local
governments to a level anticipated originally when we adopted our budget. That,
combined with a revised population estimate by the State, has enabled us to
replace about $615,000 into our current year's budget.
We would recommend that the additional amount be dealt with as follows:
It is recommended that $100,000 be replaced into current operations
as outlined in the memorandum from the Director of Finance.
2. In addition, it is recommended that the city reduce its reliance upon
special funds such as systems, storm drain, beautification funds by
reducing the amount of administrative overhead taken from those accounts.
The primary reason for this change is that the economy is simply not
predictable at this time, and should the city fail to receive adequate
funds, we may find ourselves in a serious budgetary crisis.
It is recommended that the city also reduce its reliance upon gas tax
by transferring only the amount necessary to pay for the street lighting
bill. The effect of this action will be to increase the street mainten-
ance program by approximately $216,181. Council may recall in our early
budget discussions, we indicated that staff had been forced to eliminate
a street preventive maintenance program because of the budget problems.
This change will enable us to reinstate that program and to complete one
or possibly two small projects which are related to street maintenance
and construction.
The staff has also recommended reducing the administrative charges for
the proposed city -wide street landscape maintenance district. At this
point we are not certain whether or not the Council will be adopting the
city -wide program. This amounts to a reduction of $75,000 from the
special fund budget,
City Council
Re: Reduction of State Subventions
July 19, 1982
Page Two
In summary, the budget changes have resulted in an amount of $646,986. The
Finance Director will be providing the Council with the final budget figures.
It is recommended that the revised budget be adopted as outlined.
LMW:baa
r.r n.nnwr n
Vtr r yr nnav a,aav a,�i,nuay.. �a�. w ul
MEMORANDUM
z
1977
July 19, 1982
TO: City Council - City Manager
FROM: Finance Direcior
SUBJECT: 1982 -83 Budget Revisions
A� a result of the States position change on Motor Vehicle in Lieu
Fees (11.V.L.), and some revisions in the States estimated revenues, the
following changes are affected in the Budget for 1982 -83.
Current Adjusted New
_ Source Budget _Amount Budget total
Motor Veh. in Lieu $ 359,434 $556,114 $ 915,548
Hone Owners Prop. tx 12,600 20,005 32,605
Bus. Inv. Tax Relief 23,000 10,100 33,100
Cigarette Tax 140,000 5,000 145,000
Business Licenses 205,000 15,000 220,000
Interest (Gen Fund) 280,000 56,000 336,000
vehiclo code fines 95,000 15,000 110,000
Total Adj. Revenues $1,115,034 $677,219 $1,792.253
Along with the adjustment of revenues were some changes in appropriations,
some of which treed immediate attention, others are to pull together some im-
port.mt items for program development, and yet are not too costly. One item
of concern though with regards to the distribution of revenue is the
trenoriJc;:n reliance on other than General operating funds for resources,
i.c., Drainage, Systems and beautification. The problem is that should the
activity in these funds fail to materialize, then a serious: problem would he
posed as to how to fund the General operating Accoonts. Add this to another
your of post; fh le r"Ib!Cod revenues the a the following year (83 -84), would
press: :t ;acv seriou; oL^tarla :; to ov,- rcome. Whit is then proposed In to
eliminate the tranefers from the above mention throe funds and to reduce the
tranr.fere from (;as pax to $425,000 and the industrial assessment District to
$95,300. The transfer from the Landscape Maintenance District would he
delayed until such time that it would be materially feasible to make the
tr,insl ors.
As mentioned alrcadv, sonic appropriation adjustments are requested, and
they are shomi on the following schedule.
Page 2
Totals $26,579 $99,875 $126,454
Alto attached is a summary sheet similar to page 11 of the Budget book.
This summary reflects adjustments mentioned in this memo plus this adjustments
that w.;ra ncces:;ary to i:apiement the 6.03;; cost of living changes. At the bottom
is she,,;: whit was originally prnpm;od as to what would be necessary to financially
support t-: Gunoral (81vcrnment activities and what is now recommended for that
support.
The General Goverment Activities ($7,639,376) plus the Special Funds
of $4,,,33,475v'givns the City of Rancho Cucamonga a new total Budget of $12,064,329.
It is Cec OmTlll'nded that the new Budget total of $12,064,329 be approved.
a See last page of attached summaries.
Current
Proposed
New
Activity
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Explaination
Citv Facilities
Equipment
$ 300
$ 2,315
$ 2,615
Enhance sound 6 recording system
and add Mag card purchase pay-
ment prviousiy overlooked.
Gen. Govn't Overhead
Contingency
-0-
40,000
40,000
Plann ii
Personnel
5,634
5,000
10,634
Part -time help on an interim
basis to do work on the Redevelc
ment Agency.
Equipment
1,700
25,000
26,700
Purchase a word processor to re_
duce the time of processing mucl
of the repetitious work load. .
Sheriff Dent.
Bldg improvements
-0-
5,000
5,000
Provide office space and evidenc
locker in garage area.
Personnel
-0-
9,636
9,636
Additional part -time help, half
time deputy with fringe benefit:
and other overhead.
Equipment
10,017
5,724
15,724
Add eighteen (18) cassette belt
type recorders and holsters.
Cvr.c:un it: Services
Personnel
5,928
2,800
8,728
Cover actual cost; for part -time
clerk typist.
Printing 5 Pu! -s
3,000
4,400
7,400
Printing and publication of a
disaster prepardness brochure.
Totals $26,579 $99,875 $126,454
Alto attached is a summary sheet similar to page 11 of the Budget book.
This summary reflects adjustments mentioned in this memo plus this adjustments
that w.;ra ncces:;ary to i:apiement the 6.03;; cost of living changes. At the bottom
is she,,;: whit was originally prnpm;od as to what would be necessary to financially
support t-: Gunoral (81vcrnment activities and what is now recommended for that
support.
The General Goverment Activities ($7,639,376) plus the Special Funds
of $4,,,33,475v'givns the City of Rancho Cucamonga a new total Budget of $12,064,329.
It is Cec OmTlll'nded that the new Budget total of $12,064,329 be approved.
a See last page of attached summaries.
PROUAM CENTERS
COP:fUNITY DEVELOP ":ENT
Administration
$ 73,588
Planning
305,319
Bldg G safety
Page 3
Engineering
367,647
Pulaia :forks
Supplies 6
ADNI:: ISTi;ATION
Salaries
Services
Capital
Total
Council
$
12,000
$ 10,480
$ -0-
$ 22,480
Admin C. Clerk
160,587
60,430
1,350
222,367
Adm in Services
158,817
62,578
8,308
229,703
Total Admin
$
331,404
$ 133,488
$ 9,658
$ 474,550
OPERATIONAL COSTS
Non -Dept Fringe
$
-0-
$ 592,262
$ -0-
$ 592,262
Non -Dept Gen 0.11.
-0-
263,237
452,852
716,089
Intra Gov. Svc
-0-
220,937
6,000
226,937
City Facilities
-0-
212,514
_ 6,115
218,629
Total OP Costs
$
-0-
$1,288,950
$464,967
$1,753,917
PROUAM CENTERS
COP:fUNITY DEVELOP ":ENT
Administration
$ 73,588
Planning
305,319
Bldg G safety
233,499
Engineering
367,647
Pulaia :forks
207,596
TOt81 Cam Dcv $1,187,649
SHE'RIFF'S DEPT.
Administration $ 258,227
Investigation 315,222
Patrol 1,832,972
Total Sheriff $2,406,421
CO:;, :I'::i1'Y SER':ICF.S
Administration $ 68,142
Recrca t ion 100,645
Total Com Svcs $ 168,787
GR.1::D TOTAL $4,094,261
SOURCES
Central Fund
Vehfclu code fines
Rcvvnuc Sharing
Cas Tax
Drdind,o Fund
Systums Fm•d
Beautification
O.T.S. Grant
C.D.B.G.
R,dovclojnnent Agency
Induscriat Assm't Diut
Laadum pv Assn't Dist
Capital Reserves
Original
Budget
$ 5,479,085
95,000
453,150
641,781
118,200
65,000
16,000
43,827
57,613
102,000
175,000
75,000
211.182
$ 7,532,838
$ 9,532
51,450
25,220
103,115
1.078.400
$1,267,717
$ 24,048
24,198
92,024
$ 140,270
$ 76,600
_ 5,775
$ 82,375
$2,912,800
Proposed
Budget
$ 6,141,304
110,000
453,150
425,000
-0-
-0-
-0-
43,827
57,613
102,000
95, 300
-0-
211,182
$ 7,639,376
$ 390
26,700
400
3,500
9.000
$ 39,990
$ 7,913
21,886
87,901
$ 117,700
$ -0-
-0-
$ -0-
$ 632,315
$ 88,510
383,469
259,119
474,262
1,294,996
$2,495,356
$ 290,188
361,306
2,012,897
$2,664,391
$ 144,742
106,420
$ 251,162
$7,639,376
Page 4
SUMMARY
SPECIAL FUNDS
1982 -1983
Available
Est. Rev.
Transfers
Total available
$OLi,CI
From 81 -82
for 82 -83
Out
for 1982 -1983
Gas Tax
$ 364,163
$ 617,281
$ 425,000
$ 556,444
S.B. 325 Art. 8
412,105
659,472
-0-
1,071,577
Beautification Fund
21,526
75,000
-0-
96,526
Systems Fund
366,006
220,000
-0-
586,006
Drainage Fund
273,116
430,000
-0-
703,116
F.A.U.
(7,083)
300,000
-0-
292,917
Assessment Districts
(99,632)
320,000
95,300
125,068
Recreation Fund
-0-
82,553
-0-
82,553
Grant Fund
8,522
521,553
1011440
486,748
Park Dcvolopnent
313,020
120,000
-0-
433,020
TOTAL
$1,651,743
$3,403,472
$ 621,740
$4,433,475
vaa a va' aanavvuv a.0 a.nauvavvn Cv�++mp`,
MEMORANDUM
e
July 19, 1982 n.
1977
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager 4�; 4
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Expense Allowance
Councilman Dahl has suggested that it may be appropriate to adjust the expense
allowance given to Planning Commissioners this year. If the City Council wishes
to make that adjustment at your Thursday budget meeting, the staff will be able
to make the necessary transfer of funds from some other source. The overall
expense is relatively minor when viewed with the total budget which exceeds
$10 million.
LMW:baa
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING PARTIAL RERBURSEMENT
TO MDIRCKS OF THE PLANNING COC6MISSION FOR EXPENSES INCURRE.0
WHILE' SERVING AS MENIMRS OF THE COMMISSION.
® WHEREAS, the General Law of the State of California provides
that .t city planning commission may be appointed for the purpose of
adminixterin,g both City and State laws relating to planning, zoning,
and l..nd use, and
WHEREAS, members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
devote substantial time and effort on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and
WHEREAS, Planning Commissioners are required as a part of
their responsihilities to make on -site inspections of properties
which will be discussed at further Planning Commission meetings, and
WHEREAS, as a result of those inspections, members of the
Planning Commission routinely incur certain expensaS related to the
use of their porsonal vehicles and to the performance of their official
dutioy for the City, and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate than Planning Comm iss inners
rec,•ive vomr reimburvoment for azpenso5 related to the dischurgo of
their :fririal duties,
NO(J, 'M FRIWORP., the Citc of the City of Rancho
Cucnmun:;a dues booby rosuly. tlut Ill of the Planning Commission
shall r,•cci yc thu sum of twenty -fivu dollar:; ($25.00) per meeting.
not (o oscvv,l fifty dollars ($50.00) per man Ui to offset a portion
of thr Xpvosos incurred while serving a5 member., of the Planning
Comm i.as io n.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 1979.
AYES: Mikols, Palumbo, Schlosser, Frost
b
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bridge
An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was
held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Thursday,
July 22, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon
D. Mikels.
Present were: Councilmen Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D.
Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. flikels.
2. ITEMS OF BUSINESS.
2A REQUEST FOR FUNDING - Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce.
Lauren Wasserman, city manager, stated the city had received from the Chamber of
Commerce a request for $25,000 budgetary appropriation to augment various Chamber
programs. Mr. Wasserman further stated that city staff had reviewed the Chamber
agreement and recommended Council consider an appropriation to the Chamber in
the amount of $10,640.00, and recommended specific language to be contained in a
draft agreement.
Mr. Wasserman also outlined potential areas of funding for council's consideration
in addition to the $10,640 recommended by staff for rent of office facilities,
liability and property insurance, and utilities.
1. Economic Development Conference
$3,000
2. Promotion and Advertising
$1,200
3. Equipment Rental
$3,000
4. Bookkeeper /typist
$7,800
5. Medical Insurance
$2,400
6. Miss Rancho Cucamonga Pageant
$1,200
Bob Salazar, president of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, address the
city council and stated the $25,000 request was a legitimate need and that Chamber
services could not be measured in dollars and cents.
Councilman Dahl questioned what services would he cut back if the Chamber does
not receive the appropriation request of $25,000. Bob Salazar stated that the
scope of the Wine Festival would be substantially reduced and committee partici-
pation would be cut back.
Councilman Frost stated that he would prefer that city funds provided to the
Chamber be tied into programs.
Mayor pro -tem Charles Buquet expressed a concern about a lack of an audit in the
staff recommended provisions to be included in the draft agreement. Mr. Buquet
stated allowance should be made to insure that audit is conducted to safeguard
public funds.
Councilman Schlosser questioned how the 600 chamber members feel about a $25,000
contribution from the city to the Chamber of Commerce.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to appropriate the sum of $10,640 to
the Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 82 -83 for the following expenditures:
1. Rent of office facilities $5,040.00
2. Liability and Property Insurance $2,000.00
3. Utilities $3,600.00
motion if this language was not inserted
Councilman Buquet called for the questio:t i:: xcference to the amendment. The
request for amendment failed by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser and Frost.
NOES: Dahl, Buquet, and Mikels.
The original motion by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to appropriate the sum of
$10,640 to the Chamber of Commerce for items 1 through 3 for the Fiscal Year 82 -83
passed by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Mikels. NOES: Schlosser and
Frost. ABSENT: None.
In addition to the $10,640 appropriated by the city council to the Chamber of
Commerce, other items for appropriation were discussed and considered.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve funding in the amount not
to exceed $3,000 for a West End Economic Development Conference after adoption
of the city budget. Appropriation for the Economic Development Conference would
be contingent upon a breakdown of anticipated costs to be incurred and an outline
of the scope of the program. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl,
Buquet, Mikels. NOES: Schlosser and Frost.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to appropriate cost of providing health
insurance for two full time chamber employees only (no dependent coverage), in
an amount not to exceed $2,400.00 with no retroactivity. Motion carried by the
following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: Schlosser.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost that Councilman Buquet be appointed as
the ex- officio liaiion member to the Chamber of Commerce as provided in item No.
6 of the staff proposal dated July 21, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Chamber of Commerce Agreement Provisions.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost that a draft agreement between the
city and chamber be prepared by staff with the previously approved budgeted
amounts and the following provisions:
1. The agreement shall be limited to a 12 -month period beginning July 1,
1982 and ending June 30, 1983.
2. Payments shall be paid on a monthly basis for rent of office facilities,
medical insurance, and utilities. Liability and property insurance shall
be paid upon presentation of invoice.
3. Chamber financial records shall be avilable to the city or its
auditors for inspection in order to verify expenditures of city funds.
4. The Chamber shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act requirement for
open meetings.
5. City allocated money may not be utilized for debts incurred prior to
July 1, 1982.
6, The Chamber shall provide a position on the Board of Directors for an
ex- officio liaison member to be appointed by the City Council from its
own membership.
7. City supported expenditures shall be restricted to council approved pro-
jects or programs. Funds may be used only for the purpose delineated
in the agreement between the city and the chamber.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Councilman Dahl left the meeting and did not return.
r _
budget. Mr. Wasserman stated that the revisions in oppropriations and revenues
would result in a new budget total of $12,064,239 and recommended that the
revisions outlined in the Finance Director's memo of July 19, 1982 be approved.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the recommended budget
revisions as outlined and adopt a new budget total of $12,064,329 for the city's
Fiscal Year 82 -83 Program of Services. The motion passed 4 -0 -1. Councilman
Dahl was absent.
2C. REQUEST FOR FUNDING - CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY.
Lauren Wasserman stated the city had received a funding request from the Chaffey
Humane Society in the amount of $40,000.
Discussion followed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to extend the existing Chaffey
Humane Society Agreement presented in the July 21, 1982 staff report. Motion
carried 4 -0 -1 (Dahl absent).
2D. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn the August 4, 1982
city council meeting to a special adjourned meeting on August 9, 1982 to discuss
a Resolution of Necessity regarding possible acquisition of right -of -way ease-
ment for flood control purposes. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Dahl absent).
2E. APPROVAL OF ARTICLE 8 CLAIM /TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83.
Mr. Robinson stated that each year it is necessary to authorize the city manager
to sign the Article 8 Claim in order for the city to receive T.D.A. funds for
streets and roads construction.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve:
1. Authorize the city manager to sign the 1982 -83 Article 8 Claim
2. The following distribution of T.D.A. funds for FY 82 -83:
A. Omnitrans $118,829.00
H. City of Rancho Cucamonga $659,472.00
Total $778,301.00
Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Dahl absent) .
2F. APPROVAL OF SPENDING LIMITATIONS FOR 1982 -83.
Mr. Empey stated it was necessary to establish an appropriations limit pursuant
to Article RIII8 of the California Constitution.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to adopt Resolution No. 82 -142
establishing an appropriations limit. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Dahl absont).
2G. ADOPTION OF 1982 -83 PROGRAM OF SERVICE.
After considerable discussion a motion was made by Schlosser, seconded by Frost
to approve the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Program of Service (budget) for
Fiscal Year 1982 -83 in the amount of $12,064,329.00. Motion carried 4-G-1 (Dahl
absent).
3. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to adjourn. The motion carried 4 -0 -1
(Dahl absent).
Respectfully submitted,
ZisJiRobinson tant City Manager