The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982/10/06 - Agenda PacketCM OF RANKTO CIJCtkhKI`IGA g' CrfY COUNCIL g� AGENDA 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 6, 1982 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for surmitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 'r 52 B. Roll Call: Dahl , , Buquet —, Frost= • Schlosser_s, and Mi Wll,,_. C. Approval of Minutes: August 15 and September 1, 12C�xc�t s 1982. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Monday, October 11, 7:00 p.m. - Foothill Fire District Board of Director's Meeting - Lions Park Community Center. b. Tuesday, October 12, 7:00 p.m. - Historical Preservation Commission - Lions Park Community Center. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No, 82 -10 -6 in the total amount of $278,875.34. City Council Agenda -2- October 6, 1982 b. Alcoholic Beverage Application, for on -sale beer and wine eating place by Tony E. Mosallam, Lorenzo's Deli, 9799 Base Line, Suite A. c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off -sale beer and wine by James W. Blalock, the Spirit Shoppe, 8760 Base Line. d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off -sale beer and wine by Yosry K. Elsherif, Elsherif's Mobil Service, 10477 Lemon Street. e. Forward Claim by Alice Joan Field and Harley Kenneth Smith to the City Attorney for handling. f. Forward Claim by Michael Dudek to the City Attorney 13 for handling. g. Acceptance of Agreements, Security, and Final Maps 15 for Tract Nos. 11663, 12019, and 12020 - Marlborough Development, located east of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street, west of Ramona Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -170 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREE- MENTS, IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE SECURI- TIES, AND FINAL MAPS FOR TRACT NOS. 11663, 12019, AND 12020. h. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract 20 and Lien Agreement for 6557 Mulberry Avenue sub- mitted by James and Lorraine O'Brien. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -171 22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JAMES AND LORRAINE O'BRIEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. i. It is recommended that Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 to allow the project contract to add an additional contractor to Assessment District 82 -1. • City Council Agenda -3- October 6, 1982 j. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7555, Bonds, and Agreement; and Vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue - R.C. Industrial Company. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7555, IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PITTSBURG AVENUE. k. Authorization for Public Works Inspector, Mike Long, be named the Resident Inspector for the Industrial • Assessment District. Recommend also that a salary adjustment be granted to begin after confirmation of assessments and to continue through completion of the District. Upon completion of the District, salary would return to the current pay level and classifi- cation. Funds would come from the District funds and would not impact the General Fund. 1. It is recommended that Council award contract for for reconstruction of Vineyard Avenue between 8th Street and Arrow Route to the low bidder, Red Hill Construction Co. of Santa Ana, for $241, 564.50. Also recommend approval he given for the execution of a Utilities Agreement and a Joint Use Agree- ment between the City and Southern California Edison Company for necessary power line relocations. m. Approval of Resolution to destroy personnel appli- cations which are two years or more old per Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING, THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RE- CORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090. 0 City Council Agenda -4- October 6, 1982 Set public hearing date of October 20, 1982 for Environmental Assessment and Zone Change 82 -02 - Browne. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agri- cultural) to R -1 (single family residential) for .96 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane - APN 1077 - 071 -01. o. It is recommended that Council approve the Resolution which sets forth the detailed procedure required by state law for the issuance of bonds for Assessment District 82 -1. These bonds cover the remaining $8,890,516 of assessments which were not paid in cash during the 30 -day collection period. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS AND ISSUING BONDS UNDER THE "IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915" . p. It is recommended that Council approve the escrow instructions for purchase of right -of -way for Assessment District 82 -1. This right -of -way repre- sents a cost of $80,000 covered by the "incidential" portion of the Assessment District, and provides right -of -way for realignment of Rochester Avenue. q. It is recommended that Council approve easement agreements covering the offers of dedication and deeds which have provided rights -of -way for street and storm drains in Assessment District 82 -1. The agreements provide for a total payment of $441,743 from District right -of -way funds. r. It is recommended that Council approve the resolu- 100 tion accepting offers of dedication for street and storm drain easements within Assessment District 82 -1. The offers represent purchases made with District right -of -way funds and acceptance by re- solution fulfills statutory requirements. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -174 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, • ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1. City Council Agenda -5- October 6, 1982 ,I s. Acceptance of the storm drain improvement agreement and security for CUP 82 -1 - Etiwanda Investment Co. (Pic -N- Save). RESOLUTION NO. 82 -175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 82 -1 t. Approval of subordination agreement from Lesney Development Co. for Tract No. 11350, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM LESNEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND AUTHORI- ZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. u. It is recommended that Council approve the agreement for inspection services between the City and Hotch Bedrosian for Assessment District 82 -1. V, Authorization request to advertise for bids for the resurfacing and reconstruction of Carnelian Avenue from Highland Avenue to Wilson Street, north of 19th Street. This is the first priority project on the City's Capital Improvement Program; estimated cost about $200,000. w, It is recommended that Council authorize the Finance Director to purchase two mid -size pickup trucks for the Assessment District 82 -1 project inspectors from Mark Christopher Chevrolet, Ontario, lowest bidder at $17,359.98. x, Forward Claim by Joan M. Mason, William F. Von Huben and Carol Jean Von Huben to the city attorney for handling. 112 y. Approval of Warrant Register, Assessment District 121 82 -1 for September 30, 1982 in the amount of 40 $863,579.01. City Council Agenda -6- October 6, 1982 0 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - family residential - 20,000 sq. ft. lot minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (single family residential - 10,000 sq. ft, lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyan Avenue, east of Archibald Ave. APN 201 - 251 -63 and 64. Presented by Jack Lam, 1'� 774 50-c ORDINANCE N0. 183 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 251-62 AND 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R- 1- 10,000. B. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES. An ordinance establishing public notification procedures for projects requiring Planning Commission public hearing. First reading continued from September 15, 1982 Council meeting. Presented by Jack Lam. ORDINANCE NO. 184 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PRO- CEDURES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1, REESTABLISH- ING CERTAIN FEES. 135 til iL °� C4c� , C. PROPOSED CHANGES IN ORDINANCE NO. 70. An 136 ordinance to establish Historic Lan marks and Points of Interest designations by a Resolution. Presently such designations are made by Ordinance. Presented by Bill Holley. • City Council Agenda -7- October 6, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 70 -E (first readinq) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS U, E, AND F OF SECTION 2.24.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROCEDURE. S. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS A. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR HERI- 139 TAGE PARK. It is recommended that the design Services for Heritage Park be awarded to Recrea- tion Systems, Inc. the low bidder, in the amount of $72,480. Staff reportbyill H011ey B. ALTA LOMA PARK RENOVATIONS. A presentation of 14E options for improving and redeveloping the Alta Loma Park. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. • C. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR NORTH TOWN PHASE "I _ IMPROVEMENTS. report on bids and recom- mendation of award of contract for construc- tion of street improvements for Center Street and Main Street in the North Town area. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. D. LOCAL GAS TAX OPTION, The San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control are seeking a statement of interest in the imple- mentation of a local gas tax option. If approved by a majority of the cities, the issue would be presented to the voters for ratification. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. E. AGREEMENT WITH FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ON BENEFIT E$SMENT PROGRAH. eview and approval of an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District concerning the administration of funds and projects under the proposed zone "W" Benefit Assessment Program going before the voters on November 2, 1982. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. F. REACTIVATION OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK RECREA- ® TIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM. A recortmen anon that authorization be given the Mayor to sign a Letter of Intent to the Army Corps of Engineers petitioning for the reactivation of a portion of the Cucamonga Creek Recreational Trail System. Staff report by Bill Holley. City Council Agenda -8- October 6, 1982 G. DESIGNATION OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE. San 174 Bernardino County requests tat a Council repre- sentative be designated to attend the Cities/ County Conference on November 4 and 5 at Lake Arrowhead. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS. A. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO ALTA LOMA AD- VISORY COPMMiSSION. City staff as received a notice dated September 20, 1982 of Helen Blanchard's intent to resign from her position on the CRC. Mrs. Blanchard's term of office runs through November 1985. B. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARKS AD- VI ORY COMMISSION • 8. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to an Executive Session re- garding pending litigation. • •tki rITY ?f w u cur ..."4G. "ipl v vrm - v r c P N A- F IV,,; r -, vrll OtI17-:9-J 16115 V. -II -kTr,-1-11 16717 Inr; 1671n ftC� p u iC; A,p rrrijC I b? 19 t " I A- t'TL-' U-11•1 "-I Ik??I 11" Lit I "I I•V• Sri"It W- W2 7 IASC ,1 1 p C, y 17" fl"IKP; 1.11 RMT, 1.713 7r1^ C'Llr"Fl Iii -1AI S;_,S Sr" 5131 7t� r -. FAL C 1, IF% ;. U131 71411 CIPIWY 72 �7145 JhC I6.Ri a , C-I�ISI'MP CHI V. -5 °K 16?14 'I'a clypuq ..'t, 1-?I6 III , 111Y 'I'TI - 16711 1 14 c% 14 PITTI JR-1 Cff� 16711 11C, I'll PITTLI.." C, 1671. 71•. CkLt�cr -IF1161CA, svp�. 1671-1 r.., Sr, IA14 1 1 "'rKJAP101I I'll 1 6]41 VrYn 'vvc, %.. 751,. 16�4? 15?-, Cl WeF" 01ST IIN i 11+1 FA'11Y -tV CT 16744 111 1 'S •" W41 1115 1-•1 11.` "IT'S If?.f 'r41 V11DV1 1174.1 A�i 1.11ty ,- ..kT 1674; 1691 ;CPT PC TPONSP1,RTATIri, I 174-1 P71n 'W S1 14CIrIc " AA7Fp 11.251, ITIn I!, I'll 16251 Irci _J. 11 5 I^Ai` I6"11 117, ".W. I` 1,S751 I'll 1111 T of C_ I,?%,. It 11 FIPST A' TITIF I!S CC CASP 'IC if'! .FRY rr GNT•IT Y Cn LL C C sr's ITIC I WARRAKI PFC11RCILIA 101116182 NAP. MWINAL DISCOU" ,kit 111"IFIF NFY 1.30R.99 95 a 77 NOR 151.40 8.nr. 2-4.50 331.50 9RT.40 269.56 111: N 105.10 115.?S 569.56 500.00 32.44 L12041 2..00 296.53 5 1 2.1)c 6 49 1.357.30 17 PAr.F• I R967 CIIY CF IM C11C.A�IINGA WARRANT RECJONCILI``ATIO 9/30/62 WAPR A vFN ! f N c C R IN A M F WAR REF PIFAi[E DISCCUNT NFT DATE itJA 11`�il'IIL IADFPFKPF \T RA li9 !' JI'lll 1 \BFPf N. FNT IIA K =0 11 t c. SI"ASUR 021. ALAfrTlrN1 "in 91 CAL WILLIAV L CALIF FCISCN CJ I ?CC NAGF If .1`-ICA !4's SAN F. fo. I.CY9:PA_`.1 TIC, 11Y �,,I SAS. 1': " "` I'C F-P Cl, U .i'4 1'eFLP "I r /L1F CETI'S }vns VO9 f -'1L eCIfRF4INT SYS ]•C5 C'PLCY —%T OFVLPIIT OFF n•JI' ALif FT CrsS 10'1 CA—IFLIL If "JIS B ?41 AIFA IC ^4 F I'1 ^ =Y: : "LCS JANICF iSrA STAII"'.f i1S C,i, 11CL A79 CF A "ERICA NT C SA ?3C0 CIIPUS Pr, R'PS l3f) TnG F-PT!" C^ rt't q 1 a4� 1 JICKIi ". THr'll 1.1 11 _H °I12 uA•'r'1 ' K41 :•^ F ?IN ^M1IIP "! YFALT 5.11 IITL CRF'It", fInCIAL +r)I r I I '1 C13ru° CICAYCNG ^:4 ^A`CLD 4,f. ;fA F +PLAY P4:5 Sn'I ^CI.0 CC P"r Anf'. F41] S3G pr, \C CC 1`P CV II 465C iLI -;PALE FTUCIAL SAVING 46SC CACNDALE FEDERAL SAVING 19C5 C R A A I20u BANK OF AMERICA l leh P'll ! "PL Fll'"'NT SYS 15 d0 OAK ll'EF FACING ASSVC +610 SD CALI! FOjSvx Cf ,"I nAfIX FI A °!PICA NT d SA 1100 CIIPLS "CTP.FS Pfd^ SIATI "VFPS COeP vaI F'PIS At IG'•vFNT V� 11 ` ; ALICNAINT Vf 10 !. ^.RY> ALIGN °rftT V91 F`Yr 4LIG14ENT V111 PP:At IUTAIS '1" !'a TYILL II: ^r PCNF'f NT RA 2 415.00- FINAL 1CTALS 95.739 -40 1U7C7 QTY Lr '.4 %CN;i foC A"".iC4 YAr9 f Vf 6. V C N r. C 9 N A f1 F 16117 71'0 '9tLS ASSOC. gICHARO Was 7'13 'l1 lE. SNIP.'; .rrl I(7ln 131- 1,1 ITY•"I: P TF f -. 6 PE 16211 74't 1111' Ci PY I�vT f-. 16211 1629• 74.:S 1. ^ 1 1(193 1'1 !:_TL 1: /II75T�RICIL PNFS 162n4 71 "5 11 "1' 1f-'s 7fK; PAF1rIC C34PUTIR SUPPtY 16c9- 711 PVIIIC 9r 15 N ?nl I !921171.: "_I 'S C:PP i 7P P. T: !rf It 1. CACP III • ll; In 7';' Pit AA 0 11 TS 1`UT INr. C^ t6] ^./1 714: Pvc ISI- I.YI:YILIL IC. SYS 1s 301 711'. P.11 IF rl L'q PR2S5 15.01 1-11 'T -Tl'q S /[V /P.FC YCAT 11. '.03 - (TTY 'F 1v.'H' CUrAPC:3 0 Il lr4 .3 • .r!Ir. ISK S4L 1+1 .75 - is -A ^ -' I PST' 1'.0 Il oN :017 Y11.LS TIRE'•F1e1P 16'17 -rd, f12° V" 'ref ", A H 1'1Y' 0119 rIT> CAi =Pe (, cNTOP 16 •r•: it -. I,rFTY STPIPI•:: 4"C 01 t16.1n 0,41 :A•. n%C, Cr S!)P7FY -P 631 w ;� `.9 ':••9F_rn 11 PIi P'r TATI 1� 16113 151': SC1 %LCt 0YUAITC' rnnP1• 16114 "nI S'•f ^: C:Y eUA: rl.:T% If 415 PSd SI.r -AI PAI'0Ti Y1;iCF 11!14 25S7 SLIT ^N CC'STPUCTTIN 16 Q7 V:I1 Vf17:10 W.I. 8:10 1631° VCI'I VrNO -)P 1:1.0. ?L10 161111 W1'� '7F.•'r.: ;P Yn. vela • II.121 n.15 C-1 fU 14 C s Or CO 15'. -» 114. R n SOVi 17516 Cf 16123 16`S SIAPCLFTTS If 124 0657 S111L CrOTP:I SUPPLY M15 A1.39 STA7ICAF3S rnPP 16 6711 "11 I IVAN P. ROnTRT 16177 P760 f -.r PAQ F1 0f5TP 10 T6.11 ?n: 1 IPPI2 T7:.• 16179 1711 71AFFIi 4GVT SYSTIAS 1/339 17 T>I1.9 -LrST F(:P01nUCK 11731 e'1S T:IAU Phu Tn 16131 94n U:11F1' 1F'P!ATI(..Y SFaVI 16113 5'14 11 I A PF06ERTICS FUN-) 11334 S'" VI IT °A11 UAI1fO NAY 1185 11,1q dFST PUdI 1L1196 Cn 16136 :451 aLrcr.x AATTFgv C9 16321 ".c YF Y.'P IL-STP. t L 16150 '( ir. YPIKEN 'j3SPCSAL Srp•IICE (1(1.319 51.75 1'1 1lQTCAI SERVICE • 16341 'n +' CIZ;INr ILFCTPIC 1['. 16341 Vain FINAL TOTALS .1 A WARRANT ¢rr'!NCII IATICN PAPP 1r U.ne1� UTE PPFEP rNCE In /0(./82 OISCOUhT NET FINAI. TOTALS 124 141 87? 84 z26 I'au'1 210 so 9.031 140 49 50 1.335 S.648 5. 7386 1.2600 ?.?as 1.5 3 65.327.64 175.78 516.03 125.04 183.27 929.04 390.00 175.66 99.00 929.56 441.32 19.27 9.14 875.00 L76.84 72.08 3100n.nO )a.a0 141.46 22.4n R.IU 103.135.94 PAGE. 2 • _ � Lin r COPY. c-R APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSFISI 1. rvpry51 OF LICENSEISI F LE NO To eve of NroM1CI¢ Bemro9e Cennol I RFCFIPL NO UIS 0 VISO Stem r61'LMS:LY'tSL ^J ��Fr.2..'. J Savvmemo, C.W. 9591. GEJGPAiXIGL i �ZACZ FFedh vpLn In1—... pm. dn-W d -4.1lv loved �P Permn p. N.E,SI OF APFEICA.I151 Appbed vmer s : p.. ❑ MCS.LI:L.:.a. ^DnY F_er a D.1 1111C2 E.. a 0. J. TYPS; OF TRAN5ACTION(SI Is EE EIC TYPE °etl + -0.^A 41 lLnaual Fee 1;r1.c0 1. Nom cl 9m�r_CY_YCL:. _cf' W 20 _ 5rreel S. L9799 .Baseline Rd., 'YI99 ;:aGelSne &C., Suite A C Coae C ... I H�CSG GuCSOb,a 91739 £'.1.'1 Z^.rnardizo TOTAL s 4k 4.021 6. 11 P,—,,,, L--d, 7, Are I....... Lode SFO. Ill. of I—H` Cily hmllu YES B. Mml,ng Addrn, (I a,fla <m Irom 5;- Number and S.em 'F. -e,+ I 2u9 .i7.onL:a 3t.. ntarios C': 11766 T=7. �� 9, H.,, y.v e.er been mn.mNd .f. lel.nyp 10 Hm, AW.lrd ..y .f the pr. , .f the Al,.Wk per ro9e c-".1 A,l a rp lwr.n' o111FeDep.nm... per 11. 6pl.m v"YES" on..er 1. Ire .., 9 or 10.,, an ol.dmem .btF ,M1.II be deemed pan of IM1n .pplie. 17 , A.' h-1 .gren W ,b.l ... m +.gee employed in ,.It f and p.e .dl M1.. .II 0t .vo' ¢vnon M o Ike .and (bl ,hol he w,ll + i.l.l .per a be 'r.l.led . of IFe pr.v If ,he Ale.t.lit r.ge C.nr.l Act IJ. STATE OF CALIFORNIA _. Counly .f rm , Dole 9-l¢u2 IL APPLICANi•..rr ,. nr•. . -..r.. .. ,.w ,v. e.. r.. ....... ...+.. ».r.w ... .+ VON HERF APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR S. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C.uvly el CM. na.n .. •L. I,.... _n .. ... -r ,.-n,... n. own.T • .. ,..u.. �aA.ln' Cr. m.7 4 .�DILL ...r. nX......... r _.rw.._. r ..I. m 16 F- 41.1.....•10 1> 5.41PU R !tl ,nu nr•. IB W—T.—bl'W –SEP -I 6,19az —AIL . ?18189bllllp1112131413 19 E...... Numb., nM SI-1 is fln,Vnl lVnO Ovlma ri,,l I -,,I n,,. er,111, ETrhr All.1M1,a r, Remra.a cl ❑ fiduoary Mp.•.. Pp ...COPES MAILED 9-14-82 ❑ IN -4 F.. el ..... _.... Loki al . _... ......... ._.. ._ OR•u on ...._ . _._ _blLlpl No. ...... �i F iL. �L � Mc/ -2�LL 9NeuP I I I I Mr / -Kc A.)C, f c'S I Loi�c�j 2o' 12L ; S LcL /i EIl a< z![e 5oui��RSi Co, uef4or'treLuc twz, A.I/CtliF,ALD AuE w,-T i ��ic /]L� ; �ti IAuGeLs S�aPNi��6 CCUIef2 0 Cl2UCiMt. ahAN ; Nel64L,/_ 1666 (�6,4iMeiZGHL ��ar� -.ra nua,,, -i- CLa 1A tnr IjroN(i_;if; &/.eT -0 �7- 3 FA sr R p SDUTA C -f r 4 r21 wisr � -3 \5' 0 • COPY. ..... . ..... .d .a.' APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE EICENSF(SI TO: Depa..menl of AleoM1oli[ Dir— 9. Conlrel Suremme, COAL 958)a re....n..... ... rA. uTd "P9n.d breM oppl n Iw been., aumlue n, lens-.. 1, "PE(S) OF IICENSE(5) FILE NO. Applied under SN. 21011 ERe[ aDe1 'I'll RECEIYF NO OEOGRAlHICAI CODE Dole I,wed ]. NAMfaI OF APPIICAMfs) Temp Perm,r ERe[ L eDO, a _. G. .iS• 'J. ]. TYPES! OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE TIC, TYPE $ 50.:0 7) C.— alPD.m _ CS 20 S L..1— Of bu\rna,- Number end Sbeel 8760 Baxli ^[Y Gly end Zip,cod. C-.' ,.,.,,.p c: ^ODr.R 91:::1 S r mmi.• .» TOint 3 d. D PIT..... UNN.e• 21- 1:.8:83 pcu. ts.'. 9. Ar. N.m;\N Shaw Type of Tlemm Clry L—W R. Nod., Add,., ld d,flerenr from 5)- Number uM Slreel rr.n.l IT- 8919 ..143 wldd dr., dnrl,.O axga, CA 9:701 9. Hert yoo na been mn:rd.d al a felony} 10. Nore TO.. .;Olobd mry Of A. prcMaN Of 11r. AI[ehefie • — k...... Conna11 AIL w in kilie. of If. D.Parm. 1 p.r nin9 le lh. AN? Yom, 9 1], A111 .11 1111, lal iip ony --le[ employed in .\ale li[ nfed pr<m.\N —11 h 1111e puahfi \ol.on\ Of a II[m,.., end (bl lnal he .dl nat .rolole a or permfto be .iPOINT onyeal the pro. n\ Of lho AI[ah011[ le.N09e COna01 A[1. 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ceonry of SO,t P..i. i� OOU 9/16/02 z—I M• t, nMewr ,w r 1-- 1.w,.1««, iT IA, APPLICANT•' SIGN KRE A APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR S STATE OF CALIIORNIA Caunry of ....[..n n .,mna. w rw.... •..n« w.ru.n rr r ..r+ . 4 .r. 1I.r 734101:41441* I°IRf 415i- na.vm wily Rdal. rAl, r.m., F'ar oe)NnN.m c.e nafR ` ❑ Pidan.9 wp.r.. .� ❑ �yj7A .. -COPIES -yM,A,.hEO I�. IPf. 0 tI, FA ei NI IaJ 112, �r 'L •.� .EhF ';rt l.11. 'FA. N i �I c� J G� �I J trf jGemmeL vhAF,naN p Ler L-�eSPiE,T �J�toPf� -7(.C,e&sdbue C 1�AQI�IAY�� ?AUd eN2L'S lamt2icA F -(�ie SP Q r S6gPe- i5 toCATED oti de nIa _TH EAST CORAM2 of BASeL"Jr- ANA ue, tol-& �) -ae STflTe/L /3' 2os. (?ekre2. . Ceue (LAL FLW o IJe(G+16 e4COD ?20 PeQra CuP2ek7Ly 3eD e ADSAceur t�loPefCTi ES s Aloe l� ENST sow w Esr Csmfne-1ZC /,4L -T r1-3 R -I Ll 1.i'exn 3. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IICFNSFISI 1 1. "PES; OF LICENSESI P Plf NO. )a. OePorrrnenr of Al-ho., Bmerage Cor".1 B _ _ <•_ •- ,•••COOF�V BE'FIpI NO y a gRm I _ I SAO. Type of L c I 20- 999006(Ab=doacd 81.65) L m Yes e. A &v Ade.., ;n aie.,.nr I,om s1- Nr,mbe errae�a sr. _ n.-1 r.... Pem. q. Hose yw e•er been ,.twitted or a felo yo r 10. Nose yoo a dolaretl ony of he prevbinn, of Me AI <oM1olic c •.... .,... ..- t.N:l • .:: . -x Bovoga Co eal A r or regob/ona me Depmem.nr per. • 11. fell. e'YES" om o Item 9 ar 10 on on anocbn<,1 which 0.11 be deemed p.,I of N, appb<'•on. .... . IF Appll<enr agr<•r to roar ony m ..... employed in sole I.re^fed p.<m .ill I all Me pI Atelier, el a lie ...... .M 16' Pro? be . ff rot -1,1. or ma a or permit to be xro_I,t,d eny of the provAam al lbe Alk.r.h< %.•,rage Conrrel Acr, IJ, STATE Of CALIFORNIA - -- C.om, of San, Ber.O ndi00 - - - -ON, 9/24/52 I• ^F, n. M rerm, AM nY ,pn n .n yrwrxr ll APPLICANT •-` w `O Sm r. _ F.e^ h�'v..w • • �n,.e l na w.. r .: I SIGN EA F � 'K. �t✓ P' ..�.- Ae_. y o. , . .... -. APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR ° ^• ^----- •- --•-�- 5. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of _ _y Doy _- rl we M TM, A. ..Y.. r ...e, n w rv..n.. y ru rr...•.e. -,em- T6 Na.Nt. of VOry.•ltl, _IT_ S.".1 ... rr_of LamueOl IB Llceere NVmbMQ SEP271 Z - -- -- —� t,Come 91a�IQ111�1 y Ip for ?e mn N.�bn nnA Sr,err Lry and LP CM< ! Caunry - Dt.V'ae N'ntr gel,vr Th,,I q for Orlxvlmrnl l' re Only Arm <Bed C 4e<n,d<a ne to e Fe<a pp—' 9 /e4 /s2 . ❑ ... COPIES MAILED ........'.. -� ❑R.—I Fee of .,.. Nidd i . >A n Nl1r of-S( r( -,YPT- 9. n0 loll rvOn n•vc •NV OrPE[T, Dw ,ry OIn Ec T. ,NT[p Gal IN AHY OTHEII AL CONa IIG aATE" -.F p In E3f, D •v vT. EvEe pEEN AN Alee.r Or Ic oeevuDC L¢Emee OP m oFneen OF OInGa TOR pe w c- .ADpwTG uecrvun ©ND ❑ IS. Of Y— E. P'n,n F.11Y) 10. HAVE v CAPrNEP. DR N ILE • ICED, O NECTOR DP 5 OCItn OLDER O Nt O LICCNSEC CvEP n C0"3' IC OE: ERACE LICENSE OENIEO~SVSPENDED, PI V.AE.. OP AN OFFER IN COMPPOM SENACCEPTEO OP PE,Sc,so. D D❑ AvLE3 (11 Y.,. E.,bin F.11Y) 11. CURPE4- AND PAST EMPLOYMEVT (FOR AT LEAST PAST FIVE YEARSI IOae 1O flun,H sheen rl nece35uy1 FROM TO TYPE OF WORK FIRM NAME CITY MO. YR. MO. YR. i�l I -I`1 "1�19.5� 4nplul /�:Lltr �eC;r/..� `Irl� nu'c.0 ti ,i/ t.'�t•lf:.'. '1� -/'7% /�SL Ke;T�t ltrF..,t—,Fh.Sd kl ..,nr...i/I` Inl jr• ..r �/,' -'.h� 5S, u5E AO Pn ON PPEM,SESr uSES ! •C ry0 • Q_•DL�.iC', -[2 L.Sff e �FMItPq.b 11'1`1 E la ILne you ever, anywhere or at any time, (1) forfeited ball, (2) been convicted, (3) fined, or (4) placed on probation for any violinn two of the Li a? (If anv of these events has occurred, this question must he answered "Yesrr regardless of subsequent court .iction resulting in expangement, unless an Order se PlinK records under Section 1203.4$ of the Penal Code, :elating to peesnns under :ige 13 years, has been issued. If no order has been issued, the answer must be "Yes ".) rz-4 So F I Ycs (I( yes, expluin cacti event fully.) DATE OF ARREST PLACE ARRESTED OFFENSE RESULTS I have read all of the above and der. late under penally of perjury that each and every statement madeis true. correct and complete. PLACE $IGNE.^- -1 AT SF St IAIr nF nOrAR PueLl S+A TC •{T IriE OL Cw L1i ORNIA l- 'V'w' OEra/rBT MENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL PERS N6iti 1TFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION 5. I VI. 1. NAa, CUllf 3 PnEVIOUS nArAF �3.lMar�lnn. /trot M.nrrM Nmmv,er[.l t I r NO, aSr!J ICHA(;L R;r ♦. e M .DDp E++ �� r [uN[nE ucEw[ To nE nsuEDi 'i �r4ol -mac mPl Fnwr¢ h `, 1. �� I- Glr4lC hb loll il,,nCQli it cell[ . l�\ l/fl�IA 3 1 6. N .n •It i IS to E6 it I<Iivl ejnr- Ell' IIIPI O E ce e C D 6. ALEr 3; Se::: -I NT, L��!/ NT: I3 rj HAIR: �'t li `\ ErES: br /1 PPESE.uT pV l 3 MOnC 1. 1 AN 7P xILL 9E DA, [A ®n❑ p ❑❑❑ v NT ❑D CL VEr'in "s ,]R COM PA NY A -e r L•CE Oi D - 3[[ Nl1r of-S( r( -,YPT- 9. n0 loll rvOn n•vc •NV OrPE[T, Dw ,ry OIn Ec T. ,NT[p Gal IN AHY OTHEII AL CONa IIG aATE" -.F p In E3f, D •v vT. EvEe pEEN AN Alee.r Or Ic oeevuDC L¢Emee OP m oFneen OF OInGa TOR pe w c- .ADpwTG uecrvun ©ND ❑ IS. Of Y— E. P'n,n F.11Y) 10. HAVE v CAPrNEP. DR N ILE • ICED, O NECTOR DP 5 OCItn OLDER O Nt O LICCNSEC CvEP n C0"3' IC OE: ERACE LICENSE OENIEO~SVSPENDED, PI V.AE.. OP AN OFFER IN COMPPOM SENACCEPTEO OP PE,Sc,so. D D❑ AvLE3 (11 Y.,. E.,bin F.11Y) 11. CURPE4- AND PAST EMPLOYMEVT (FOR AT LEAST PAST FIVE YEARSI IOae 1O flun,H sheen rl nece35uy1 FROM TO TYPE OF WORK FIRM NAME CITY MO. YR. MO. YR. i�l I -I`1 "1�19.5� 4nplul /�:Lltr �eC;r/..� `Irl� nu'c.0 ti ,i/ t.'�t•lf:.'. '1� -/'7% /�SL Ke;T�t ltrF..,t—,Fh.Sd kl ..,nr...i/I` Inl jr• ..r �/,' -'.h� 5S, u5E AO Pn ON PPEM,SESr uSES ! •C ry0 • Q_•DL�.iC', -[2 L.Sff e �FMItPq.b 11'1`1 E la ILne you ever, anywhere or at any time, (1) forfeited ball, (2) been convicted, (3) fined, or (4) placed on probation for any violinn two of the Li a? (If anv of these events has occurred, this question must he answered "Yesrr regardless of subsequent court .iction resulting in expangement, unless an Order se PlinK records under Section 1203.4$ of the Penal Code, :elating to peesnns under :ige 13 years, has been issued. If no order has been issued, the answer must be "Yes ".) rz-4 So F I Ycs (I( yes, expluin cacti event fully.) DATE OF ARREST PLACE ARRESTED OFFENSE RESULTS I have read all of the above and der. late under penally of perjury that each and every statement madeis true. correct and complete. PLACE $IGNE.^- -1 AT SF St IAIr nF nOrAR PueLl S+A TC I • `'ELSrIERIF< MAUL 5EY'Ji L 10477 Ler:ICr.7 A,,G rc,IrF.'_ CN tlC SCUV,'Wr<r 6r LetMO,) [i'VrNUI AA17- I[liU,0OJ iLVL/JUC. C I� I T � i N �•V,G I9— GeuEfL r=,L PLfVJ Ne 1614& /ZNaeD C6VNAWC1,41- ,rnu ouz, i6lo AT /o /J ow/l,.eA+7 &JW6 = C -1 Id klo,erg 47-5 SOO_A AP -3 -4 ,?- 3 -70 F /iST / C-1 wrsr / i7 -1-1 � kl_1 • • • 6 7 I� a''ALICE JOAN FIELD and HARLEY HENNETH SMITH, g I Claimants, 10 VS. 11 I I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and 12ICITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and :,DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive 13 I PROPOSED CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AND PROPERTY DAMAGE (Section 910 of the California Government Code) 14 '_5 To the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Clerk of 16 the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino: 11 You are hereby notified that ALICE JOAN FIELD and HARLEY is KENNETH SMITH whose address is 8115 Orchard Street, Alta Loma, 19 'California, 91701, claim damages from the County of San Bernardino 20 :and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount computed as of the 21 date of presentation of this claim of $25,000.00. 22 This claim is based on personal injuries and property damage 'sustained by claimants on or about August 6, 1982, in the County of 24 San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the following 25 circumstances: ::6 Claimant, ALICE JOAN FIELD was injured in an automobile vs. f:7 automobile accident caused by the excessive speed in which a San '; Bernardino County Sheriff, ROBERT BARNES, JR., was operating his T4VVV1 ISFACE BELOW FOR TIIA \C 1.1 ONLYI HUDSON. JOHNSTON & HAZEN'S r 1 ^ .°Ill..9NLL uw wLrovil °N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ li ]]T NOMM VINLfMn. 9VIfl ADMINISTRATION 2 ROfi OIIIC[ 90R JIOT ONTARIO. GJJMRNIA 91701 Scp 2q 19R7 may' 1 p1A) 906JBi0 AM PW (� 718I9I10Al2t1I2I3A5I6 C d.i. ; ro & 4 : �c CI r g Att*=Cy]for Claimants ( +Z-- 1)'1'41 I' 6 7 I� a''ALICE JOAN FIELD and HARLEY HENNETH SMITH, g I Claimants, 10 VS. 11 I I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and 12ICITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and :,DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive 13 I PROPOSED CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AND PROPERTY DAMAGE (Section 910 of the California Government Code) 14 '_5 To the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Clerk of 16 the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino: 11 You are hereby notified that ALICE JOAN FIELD and HARLEY is KENNETH SMITH whose address is 8115 Orchard Street, Alta Loma, 19 'California, 91701, claim damages from the County of San Bernardino 20 :and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount computed as of the 21 date of presentation of this claim of $25,000.00. 22 This claim is based on personal injuries and property damage 'sustained by claimants on or about August 6, 1982, in the County of 24 San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the following 25 circumstances: ::6 Claimant, ALICE JOAN FIELD was injured in an automobile vs. f:7 automobile accident caused by the excessive speed in which a San '; Bernardino County Sheriff, ROBERT BARNES, JR., was operating his I I 1County vehicle on 19th Street (S.R. 30) at the intersection with 2 'Carnelian Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in a dangerous 3 sway thereby causing a collision with the claimant, ALICE JOAN 4 !FIELD. 5, The injuries sustained by claimants as far as known as of 6'Ithe date of presentation of this claim consist of contusions and 1 7 l�various injuries to her back and neck. q�i Claimant, HARLEY KENNETH SMITH, has a claim against the 9 .County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in that 1011,his automobile driven by ALICE JOAN SMITH was damaged beyond repair l ll!'by the collision caused by a San Bernardino County Sheriff, ROBERT 12! BARNES, JR. 13I'i DAMAGES INCURRED TO DATE: 14i1 Approximate expense for medical care for ALICE JOAN FIELD: $20,000.00 15 I! 16 171'ii bypHARLEY property lost $ 5,000.00 18I 1911 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM: $25,000.00 201 21. All notices or other communications with regard to this 22!61aim should be sent to claims at Post Office Box 3487, Ontario, i 231, California, 91761, c/o Hudson, Johnston & Hazen, A Professional 24 Law Corporation. 25 Dated: September 17, 1982 ?6 HUDSON, JOHNSTON & HAZEN 27 :'a IO�ON. JONNSION JOSEP E. JOHNSTON s N/z[N • �nartmonu �' yew eonansnon I � / / • CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AGAINST THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECLARATION OF PRESENTATION OF CLAIM BY MAIL I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the claim affixed to this declaration. I am a citizen of the United States and employed in San Bernardino County, California. My business address is 337 N. Vineyard Avenue, Ontario, California. I presented the affixed claim by depositing the original therof in the United States mail in Ontario, California, on September 17, 1982, in a sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, with the name and address shown on the envelope being as follows: • COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 9320 Baseline Road 175 West 5th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 San Bernardino, CA 92415 Said mailing was made by certified, return receipt requested. At the time of the deposit there was regular delivery by the United States mail between the place of deposit and the place of address. Signed at Ontario, California, this 17th day of September, 1982. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. KAREN WRIGHT i 0 7 l 13 ,..,. • 1 VINCENT J. aw CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA L Attorney at Law 2 2107 North Broadway, Suite 106 ADMINISTRA . ION Santa Ana, California 92706 /,/J 3 SEP �'9 )01'82 Telephone: (714) 836 -8833 AY PH a 7i8131D11I1121112�J141516 Attorney for Claimant, ��'t 5 ;MICHAEL DUDEK cam/ 6 7 8 MICHAEL DUDEK, ) CLAIM UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 910 9 Claimant, ) 10 vs. ) 11 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ) CITY OF ONTARIO, and CITY OF ) 12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ) 13 Defendants. ) • 14 TO: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF ONTARIO, and CITY OF 15 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 16 MICHAEL DUDEK hereby makes a claim against the above- mentioned public 17 entities for the sum of $20,000.00 and makes the following statements in support of 18 the claim: 19 1. Claimant's Post Office: 14719 Ocaso 20 La Mirada, California 90638 21 2. Notices concerning the claim should be sent to: 22 Mr. Michael Dudek c/o Vincent J. Russo 23 Attor. ey at Law 2107 North Broadway, Suite 106 24 Santa Ana, California 92706 25 3. The date and place of the occurrence giving rise to this claim are in the 26 City of Rancho Cucamonga, on 4th Street with its intersection at Etiwanda, on 2& 27 it, 1982,_ 28 4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows; l 13 1 Mr. Dudek was a passenger in a vehicle traveling southbound on Etiwanda going 2 towards its intersection with 4th Street. The lights at said intersection were not* 3 working for some unknown reason. The vehicle in which Claimant was a passenger 4 proceeded lawfully into the intersection and was broadsided by another vehicle which 5 entered the intersection going Westbound on 4th Street. 6 Due to the negligence on behalf of the Defendants, Claimant MICHAEL DUDEK 7 was injured in his health, strength and activity, sustaining injury to his body and shock 8 to his nervous system and person, all of which have caused and continue to cause 0 Claimant great mental, physical and nervous pain. Mr. Dudek was reouired to and did 10 employ physicians and surgeons to examine and treat and care for him. Also by reason 11 of the negligent acts, Claimant was prevented from attending his usual occupation and 12 thereby lost earnings. 13 5. On this date, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario had juris. 14 diction to maintain traffic lights which were installed by the County of 5ar>• 15 Bernardino. 16 6. The events, actions and damages referred to in Paragraph 4 are a direct 17 result of the negligence in the operation of said traffic signal light. The Cities of 18 Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario and /or San Bernardino County have a duty to maintain 10 and operate the light in question and to train, select and supervise those who maintain 20 said light so as to cause it to be operated in a safe manner. Such duty was breached 21 when said Defendants negligently allayed the public to be in serious danger when 22 traveling through the intersection in questions. 23 7. The basis of this claim is the negligence of the County of San Bernardino 24 and Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario, in not maintaining and operating said 25 traffic signal light in a safe manner. Said claim is for general damages in the amount 26 of $20,000.00. ' 27 Dated: September 13, 1982 -, ' /04A y VINO: h' . U O 28 Attorney for Claimant, MICHAEL DUDEK 2_ i 0 1] DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CLCA o STAFF REPORT October 6, 1982 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr. Assistance Civil Engineer F SUBJECT: Acceptance of Agreements, Securities and Final Maps for Tract Nos. 11663, 12019 and 12020 - Marlborough Development The subject maps, located east of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street and west of Ramona Avenue are submitted by Marl- borough Development. The Tentative Map was approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1981 consisting of 393 town- houses on 40 acres. The improvement agreements and securities have been submitted by Marlborough Development to guarantee installation of the off- site improvements in the following amounts: Tract 11663 Tract 12019 Faithful Performance $28,000 $143,800 Labor and Material $14,000 $ 71,900 Retention Basin Maint. Security $ 2,000 $ -- Letters of approval have been received from Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Central School District and Cucamonga County Water District. The C.C.sR's have been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of Improvement and Maintenance Agreements and securities and the signature of said maps. Respectfully submitted, �6 LBH:J •'aa Attachments PROJECT JGHU�H STREET HEMLOCK Z TR E STREET 77** srPFFORo Tn RO � STREET SCREET Q h FOC rWlI 1_ e<�U%- avAiZa VICINITY MAP NOT ZtJ EXACT S6ZALr= `r'wo1� title.; CITY OF anNCI 10 CUCAMONGA ' TRACTS 11663, 14019 and 12020 r �r ,p ENGINEERING DR'ISION T ,c 1 \`l� �m VICINITY AIAP j� PaBe i;N ir£ DINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT O321 WEST FIFTH STHEET..HT.I. CALIF OR lIA S�16I JI JQI �... :._r • .ICi ra E51 0E1 ' :N L1510 BOn v'E'. MLLE • <Lf TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This is to verify that Marlborough Development Corp. has —met requirement of rrdinance ;1o. 30 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and has pain builders fees in the amount of `y+30_0_00 per dwelling unit directly to the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The *total amount of $2,100.00 is for 7 units in the project as descr i'ned below. • Tract 811663 Archibald North of Foothill r * Townhouses for Russell Dickinson ),!t12 ___ July.14_1982__,_____ 17 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rar4hoCuccmnrnga.Califanio 91730-3598 Tel.714- 989-8541 LETTER OF RECEIPT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to verify that MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION has met the requirement of Ordinance No. 30, amended by Ordinance No. 69, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and has paid builder's fees in the amount of • THREE THOUSASD,EIGHT HUNDRED FIPPY DOLLARS (E 3,850.00 per dwelling unit directly to the Central School District. The total amount of THREE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS �E 3,850.00 i5 for seven (7) it th. prc_. AS detcri'bed beIoti. ... Tract No. 11663 Received by: Dated: .Lilo 14, 11Ha units I CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DONA MERCED SCHOOL VALLE VISTA SCHOOL 7955 Archibald Ave. 7611 Hellman Ave. 10333 Palo Alto St. 7727 Valle Vista Drive Tel. 714• ?87.2541 Tel. 714-9874788 l' i Tel. 714.980.1600 Tel. 714.98"697 !4 P^ Board of Trust. AL CENTRp �. l-i Dab E. Taylor, President Diane M.Rlvord,Clok {t .J � 1 Ruth A. Musser. Member SCHOOL Glen Glen bb !qI 0}IILDRE,U Pamela J. Wrlphp.Membn • l J. Wrig t.M DISTRICT�„ ALLOWED Norman C. Gultb. Ed. D., Sun,,1w ndmt � John A. McCrary, A utnt SupmnleMent 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rar4hoCuccmnrnga.Califanio 91730-3598 Tel.714- 989-8541 LETTER OF RECEIPT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to verify that MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION has met the requirement of Ordinance No. 30, amended by Ordinance No. 69, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and has paid builder's fees in the amount of • THREE THOUSASD,EIGHT HUNDRED FIPPY DOLLARS (E 3,850.00 per dwelling unit directly to the Central School District. The total amount of THREE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS �E 3,850.00 i5 for seven (7) it th. prc_. AS detcri'bed beIoti. ... Tract No. 11663 Received by: Dated: .Lilo 14, 11Ha units I CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DONA MERCED SCHOOL VALLE VISTA SCHOOL 7955 Archibald Ave. 7611 Hellman Ave. 10333 Palo Alto St. 7727 Valle Vista Drive Tel. 714• ?87.2541 Tel. 714-9874788 l' i Tel. 714.980.1600 Tel. 714.98"697 !4 • RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAPS FOR TRACT NO.'S 11663, 12019 AND 12020 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No.'s 11663, 12019 and 12020, consisting of 76 lots, submitted by Marlborough Development, Subdivider, located east of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street and west of Ramona Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor IQ 0 a rnmv nv.nnw. ntinn —� STAFF REPORT 3 f DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Sto£a, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Imporvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 6557 Mulberry Avenye submitted by James and Lorraine O'Brien IW7 Mr. and Mrs. O'Brien, property owners, have applied for a building permit to construct a dwelling unit on the property at 6557 Mulberry Avenue. The property does not front upon any public street. The access to the lot is provided from Highland Avenue by Mulberry Avenue, an unpaved access through private easements among the adja- cent property owners. As a prerequisite to issuance of building permit for landlocked parcels as established by City council Resolution No. 80 -38, an irrevocable offer of dedication on the portion of the access for street purposes and a lien agreement for future improvements of the street are required. The document for the offer of dedication for that portion of Mulberry Avenue has been executed and Mr. and Mrs. O'Brien have entered into a lien agreement to provide the required street improvements at some future date to be determined by the City. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign the lien agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LBIk A :jaa Attachments C9V µ 110 0 CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA A ENGINEERING DIVISION w T VICINITY N1AP 1 tit page • RESOLUTION 40. * - ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JAMES AND LORRAINE O'BRIEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 1, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and WHEREAS, 6557 Mulberry Avenue, located easterly of East Avenue between Highland Avenue and Victoria Avenue, is a landlocked parcel within the meaning of said Resolution No. 80 -38; and WHEREAS, James and Lorraine O'Brien have executed a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign O same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren A. Wasserman, City C erK u Jon D. Mikels, Mayor �� c • 9 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 8, 1982 c TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Michael Long, Res ?dent Engineer /A.D. 82 -1 SUBJECT: Contract Change Order No. 1, Assessment District 82 -1 The project contractor has requested an additional subcontractor to assist with reinforced concrete pipe construction. As the change has no effect on project cost and because the change has been approved by the Project Engineer, it is recommended that City Council approve the Change Order. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 to allow the project contractor to add an additional subcontractor to Assessment District 82 -1. Respectfully submitted, LBH:ML:bc Attachment h � CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No. 1 Sheet I of PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 CONTRACT NO. TO: Bonadiman- McCain Inc , Contractor. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the PI ans and Specifications or do the following described work not Included in the plans and specifications on this contract. NOTE: This change order is Trot effective until approved by the City Council Description of work to be aon<, estimate of quantities, and prices [o be paid. Segregate between additional work at contract price, agreed price and force account. unless othe rv.i se stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time. Change requested by: Bonadiman - McLain, Inc. The last percentage shown is the net accumulated increase or decrease from the original quantity in the Engineer's Estimate. - Per your request, Belczak- Masanovich, a joint venture, is approved to sub- contract Work on this project. Work sub - contracted shall not exceed those limits suggested in the request attached and considered sheet 2 of 2 of this change order. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Hasierma n, City Clerk Estimated Cast: Decrease 5 -O- or Increase S By reason of this order, the time pf epmcletion will be adjusted as follows: Na dditional Oays Submitted by: I Dato: Aopr,ved:Pro]ect Engineer by; Y F� 4 Inc under pt gned contractor na o ve grven c rcrul con,.J ersion to [na cnange r Posed and he rnoy agree. If This proposal Is approved. [oat We will provide all = ur equi ono, fnish all materials, <WCept as oav otherwise be noted above, and car - form all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept a$ full Payment therefor the prices shown above. Accepted: < /- /_I�.Z O. to Contactor ay: Title INNN w w w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician 197 � SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7555, Bonds and Agreement and Vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue - R. C. Industrial Company Parcel Map 7555 dividing 25.95 acres of land into 3 parcels, located south of 8th Street on the east side of Milliken Avenue was tenta- tively approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1982. A Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $86,000 and a Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $43,000 is being submitted to guaran- tee construction of interior streets. A small portion of Pittsburgh Avenue, previously dedicated by Parcel Map 5760, requires vacation. This portion, as shown on the attached map, is being vacated due to the relocation of the south property line of parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5760. This adjustment to the property line was completed through the filing of a lot line adjustment. Since this vacation is for the purpose of relocation, a summarily vacation is appropriate and no public hearing is required. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 7555, the vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue and accepting the bonds and agreement. Resyectfully s mitted, A n A LB K :jaa Attachments h yt� `1C1 \II) CITY OP KANCI-10 CLC- -V \10 \CA title; FNGINFFRING DIVISION \rn VICINITY \1: \P • • PARCEL. MAP lf.f.11111 envm J M1, ,U iie ljui•r� : YISM L lJgy'L�T� v 0 1\ S Sam O G �\ \Z n PAR G 7555 owe "iE�:Ptw "to. omisv - :'L t .v a.. a3ve: �� YIILII'ES' J:Li (V[WV4t O .flF! vilin:(I Si.i! [1[ 1PV4. . fOU111 Xtr .. Il1II v (nt I,V.Xi1 i• I4[IXpX('4L.E.LLxILLtIxIM( [04:1 -� o[suiniw 1.11. iXSR .4411 "53 (sf,Li Sn�IxAOVN]5e a.......... L(J riL:.JS 0f3Y eFXI. "vIW [Mtl •_LXw I •I..._ n Ci 4 aE 'El' c y vu's A �' � ¢• \�// �_ A I A. 7 .,. •_LXw I •I..._ 0 M RESOLUTION NO. 82 -164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7555, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7555), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7555, submitted by R.C. Industrial Company, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side of Milliken, south of 8th Street, being a division of Parcel 4 and 5 of Parcel Map 5670 as recorded in Book 54, Pages 53 -56 was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7555 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7555 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 11 • RESOLUTION NO. 82 -165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because it has been superceded by relocation. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Counuil hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V -021 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B ", and by reference made a part thereof. • SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of Pittsburgh Avenue no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall cause certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: • Lauren M. 'dasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor � r� EXHIBIT "A" • That certain parcel of land in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, being a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue as shown on Parcel Map No. 5760, filed in Book 54, Pages 53 through 56 of Parcel Maps, records of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map No. 5760; thence, along the boundary line of Parcel 4 of said Parcel Map said boundary line also being the easterly right -of -way line of said Pittsburgh Avenue, N 00 °22'01" W, 22.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence, continuing along said easterly right -of -way line N 00 °22'01" W, 24.45 feet to the northerly line of Pittsburgh Avenue as shown on said parcel map; thence, perpendicular to said easterly right -of -way line, S 89 °37'59" W, 3.59 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 85.00 feet, a radial of said curve to said point bears N 72 055'05" E; thence, southeasterly and southerly along said curve through a central angle of 16 042'54" an arc length of 24.80 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said parcel of land contains 0.001 acres. • • 7J ` j `J i V - 021 Exhibit "B" Se , 3). NORTHERLY LINE OF S9�k' PITTSBURGH AVE AS \\ SHOWN ON P. M, NO 57601 �i- i RPO n•I6'42' '54' R,85.00' `` o L, 2A.60 Z� u� U \ "fit 6 30' O tV' O 9 SEVENTH STREET J q,t CITY OF RANCI10 COCA \IO. \'GA yy e' ENGINLFRING DIVISION y° 1977 VICINITY NIAP ,. 4 ij 40'22' 01W 24.45 OF BEGINNING \ N 0' 22' 0I' W // 22.67' NORTHWEST CORNER PARCEL 3 A N nnn i • • VL11 VF RA1Y V11V VVVA1nVLYVA MEMORANDUM September 29, 1982 TO: James Robinson Assistant City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer SUBJECT: Assessment District Management (l�O GV „Iv�7 z ( cy i F` 1977 As we have discussed, we are planning to have Mike Long perform the role of Resident Inspector for the upcoming Industrial Assessment District. This role will involve the management of two to three project inspectors, a $150 - $200,000 construction survey contract, a $25 to $50,000 materials test contract, and over $8 million in construction. The magnitude of this job, and the increase in responsibility would normally require an individual of higher classification than covered by the Public Works Inspector classification. I an confident that Mike is capable of handling the increased responsibility involved, but feel he should also enjoy an increased pay more commensurate with the added responsibility. I would recommend a temporary ten percent (107.) increase to begin after confirmation of assessments and to continue through completion of the District. With District completion, Mike would return to his current classification and pay level. In that the increased pay would be drawn from the District funds along with his current full pay, there would be no fiscal impact to the General Fund caused by this temporary increase. I believe the prudent management approach would be to recognize this con- siderable increase in responsibility and would request serious consideration of the proposal. LH:ba • • 9 i.r r no n STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Vineyard Avenue Reconstruction Project Contract and Acceptance of Utilities and Joint Use Agreements with Southern California Edison Company *p Lv`"nmOh F 1917 The Vineyard Avenue Reconstruction Project from 8th Street to Arrow Route has been pending for about two years because of federal envi- ronmental delays and funding availability problems. Authorization to request bids finally occurred a short time ago and eleven bids were received, ranging from $241,565 to $336,523. The low bid is 11;& below the Engineer's Estimate and was received from Red Hill Construction Company of Santa Ana. Completion of the job will be accomplished with 869 Federal funds and 149 City funds and is expected to require about six months of construction time. Attached to this report are a Utilities Agreement and a Joint Use Agreement for your approval. The former sets forth conditions under which City will pay Southern California Edison Co. for relocation of power poles which have prior rights in the street right -of -way. The estimated cost of $38,280 (to be confirmed upon completion) will be 861 reimbursed with Federal funds. The latter agreement provides for the Southern California Edison Co. retaining its prior rights for these same poles. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve award of the recon- struction project contract to Red Hill Construction Company, the low bidder and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Utilities and Joint Use Agreements. Respectfully submitted, �P J LBi1 P a Attac .ents CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT V114EYARO AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION VjNFyggp AVENUE. N4NCjI0 C CAM!7RGA PAGE 1 of 4 O0.TE AUGUST 27, 1982 CONTRACT N0. FAU M7MR- R194(2) Red_ Hill Cans L__ Fontana Paying Co_ntrac_t_ing_ COnst. Riverside C_on_s_L NCG,e COnst. _APerican 810 M:UUIIT 810 MOUNT Mil F1S 01fANTIT ICS _ OIU M10UNT _ _ BID Na0M1T _C_OPP BID N40U!iT 810 AINNIUT Bidder" Bond L.S. 18800.0 18,800.00 1500O.G0 15.000,00 15000.0 15,000.00 15000.0 15,000.001 1 Clearing and Grobhing 5000.00 15,000.00 i5000xe 15,000.00 2 Roadway Dcavation 748 C.Y. 5.00 13,240.00 9.60 Z6,380.80 4.4 12,146.16 7.00 19.236.00 S.0 13.740.00 5.3 14,564.40 3 Remove I. x is.ing Base and '621 10,288.35 2,895.96 1.2 9,526.25 1.25 9.526.25 2. Of 15,242.00 1.9;14.632.32 Surf", i ng S.Y. 1.35 .36 4 nzphalt Concrete 1184 Tons 23.00 73,232.00 23.90 76,097.60 23.4 74,505.60 24.50 78,008.00 24.51 78,008.0() 23.4 74,505.60 5 Agyre9atc Oa"e 353 C.Y. 11.00 14,883.00 15.50 20,971.50 10.8 14,612.40 7.0 9.471.00 12.81 17,318.40 21.5 29.089.50 6 Placement only 8" A.L. dike 079 L.F. 1.10 2,286.90 1.15 2,390.85 1.2 2,494.80 1.0c 2,079.00 1.24 2,598.25 1.2 2.494.80 7 9' P.C.C. cure and gutter 077 L.F. 5JS 11,942.75 5.60 11,631.20 6.21 12,877.40 7.0 14,539.00 6.3 13,085.16 S.4 11,215.80 8 B" P.C.C. curb only 249 L.F. 5.5U 1,369.50 5.20 1,294.80 6.1 1,523.88 5. DE 1,245.00 4.40 1,095.60 4.51 1,120.50 9 Partland cement concrete class 0 Ufiscellancouz items cross gutter, spandrels, and drive approaches) 62 C.Y. 100.0 6,200.00 90.00 5,580.00 125.0 7,75D.00 110.0 6,820.00 118.0 7,316.00 90.0 5,580.00 10 Minor concrete (minor strutures) 4.5 C.T. ' 480.0 6,960.00 45D.00 6,525.09 520.0 7.540.00 40D.0 5.800.00 500.09 71250.00 I 350.0' 5,075.00 17 Miscellaneous iron and steel -120 lb. 1.5 3,180.00 1.00 2,120.00 1.0 2,204.80 3,0 6,360.00 1.13 I 2,438.00 .8 1,082.00 12 15" RCP Class 11, 12500 34L. F. 36.0 1,224.00 38.00 1,292.00 68.0 2,312.00 M. 1,224.OD 46.OQ 1,564.00 i 53.0 1,802.00 ,U Lati CITY OF RAIICHO CUCA113NGA PAGF 2 of 4 SUIYOLRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT LOCAT ION DATE - CONTRACT No. II EMS DIIAU1111ES Red Hill COnert 010 L�DIIITT Fontana_ Pavinq _ OID A-111141 COPP CortmractioL 010 MOUNT Amerloan ConsL _ BID TA(1 INT Riverside Cmmst. BID AI OHOT McGrew Const. Rf0 AMOUNT 972.00 1,188.00 1. 13 I RCP CLes Ili, 1;19X2 27 L.F. 36.00 38.00 1,026.00 66. DO 1,782.00 38.001 1,026.00 46.OD 1,242.00 44.00 14 18 RCP Class 11, 12500 59 L.F. 43.00 2,537.00 42.CC 2,478.00 66.00 3,894.00 40.00 11 2,360.00 45.OD 2,714.00 40.00 2,360.DD 15 30" R,.P Class 11, 12 SOD 12 L.F. 60.00 720.00 45.DC 540.00 75.00 900.00 50.00 60G.00 54.00 648.00 70.0 840.00 16 Adjust manhole to grade 8 EA 150.00 1,200.00 14G.00 1,120.DO 203.00 1,624.00 250.00 2,000.00 220.00 1,760.00 300.0 2,400.0 17 13" . 12^ WA, 16 qa 76 L.F 49.00 3,724.00 41.00 3,116.00 61.00 4,636.00 30.00 2,280.00 47.00 3,572.00 40.0 3,040.00 18 Type 'L' markers 11 EA 25.00 275.00 39.0t 429.00 26.00 286.00 30.00 33D.OD 42.00 462.00 24 . OC 264.00 19 Traffic signing L.S. 2200.00 2,200.00 2100-OC 2,100.00 21 90.00 2,190.00 2600.00 2,600.00 2300.00 2,300.00 2300.0 2,300.00 20 TfafflC SLr(Pin9 and ""tin, L.S. 3200.0 3.200.00 3DOO.Of 3,000.00 3800,00 3,800.00 40DO.00 4,000.00 3700.00 3,300.00 3300.0 3,300.OD 21 Hetal guard rail 110 L.F 33.pO 3,630. DO 42.0 4,620.00 35.00 3,850.00 36.00 3,960.00 45.00 4,950.0 46-OC 5,060.00 2 Relocate guard rail 50 L.F 16.00 800.00 14.5( 725.00 18.00 900.00 18.00 900.00 15.50 775.00 18.0 900.00 23 Traffic s(9nal L.S. 2000.00 62,000.00 62953.0 62,953.00 65900.0 65 900.00 0500 A0 701 SL 00 5000.00 65,000_00_ 64000.0( 64.000.00 241,564.50 '54,286.73 W56,055.29 62,533.9? $!59,864.25 261,378.85 $ L • • CITY OF RAIICMO CUCM401GA SU"RY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT VINEYARD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION VINEYARD AVFNIIF. PANCNO CUCAMDN64 PAGE 3 of 4 DATE AUGUST 27, 1982 CONTRACT 140. Fr+U M {MR- R194(2) I7 ENS OIIhtIT ITI CS --b ing _ _ _ __-- NM1Utl1 E.L. Yeager Cons[. __ __. ._. _ OID NWIINI Sully- Hiller Cantr. -_ _- ___.._._ BIO ANOUNi Gentry Brothers ____ - -__ -. OIU N10 Wi laird [nnst. __._ --- 810 FI'0U:l1 ' 870 AMOUNI bidder's Bond_ 15,000.00 15000.0 15,000.00 21000.00 21,000.00 5000.00 15,000.00 15000.0 15,000.00 1 Clearing and Grubbing L.S. 2 Roadway Excavation ]48 C.Y. 10,992.00 10.0 27,480.00 7.5 20,747.40 7.50 20,610.00 12.0 32,976.00 3 Remove Existing Base and Surfacing 521 S.Y. 10,288.35 2.511 19,052.50 1.00 7,621.00 2.50 19,052.50 3.5 26,673.50 4 Asphalt Concrete 1184 Tans 24.75 78,804.00 25.011 79,600.00 25.X 79,600.00 25.75 81,988.00 32.Of 101,RRB.00 5 Aggregate Base 1353 C.Y. 12.75 17,250.75 12.0 16,236.00 13.DC 17,589.00 15.00 20,295.00 15.01 20,295.00 6 Placement only R" A.C. dike 1079 L.F. 3.25 6,756.75 1.0 2,079.00 2. DC 4,158.00 4.50 9,355.50 3.0 6,237.00 7 8" P.L.C. curb and gutter 077 LF. 6.25 12,981.25 7.0 14,539.00 6.5 ( 13,500.50 6.20 12,877.40 6-6q B 8" P.C.C. cool, only 249 L.F. 6.10 1,518.90 4.0 996.DC 6.2 1,556.25 5.80 1,444.20 6.31 1,566.70 9 Portland cement concrete Class B (Miscellaneous itecis cross gutter, spandrels, an drive approaches) 62 L.Y. 120.00 7,440.00 112.0 6,944.00 100.0 6,200.00 100.00 6.200.00 95.0 5.890.00 10 Minor concrete (minor , strutures) 14.5 C.Y. 600.00 8,700.00 600.0 8,700.00 580.1 8,410.00 450.00 6,525.00 650.01 9,42'..00 11 Miscellaneous iron and steel 120 16. 1.2 2,544.00 1.2 2,650.00 1.3 2,662.00 1.00 2,120.00 1.2 } 2,650.00 12 IS" RCP Class 11, 1250D 34L.F. 55.0 1,870.00 38.0 1,292.00 61.0 2,074.00 55.00 1,870.00 85.0} 2,F90.00 i • • • 6V CITY OF RAIICIO CUCADU11GA PAGE 4 of 4 SUI4NRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED MIJECT LOLAT ION DATE ITE1'S QUINT I T IES - -JWPav Paving - Oln h'10'Jfli E.L_ Yeager Const. 010 fJ:1t II:R Sullydliller Contr . BID Hitlu!IT Gentry Brothers 010 f °J U'S Latrd ConSt. 010 I A:'(IUtlt BIO 14,01197 13 15 SCP Class III, 15000 27 L.F. 60.0 1,620.00 39.00 1,053.00 61.0 1.647.00 53.01 1.431.00 80.00 2,160.00 14 18" RCP Class 13, 1250D 59 L.F. 58.01 3,422.00 44.021 2,595.00 63.0 3.717,00 60.0 3,540.00 73.00 4,307.00 15 JU' RCP Class 11, 12500 12 L.F. 75.01 900.00 53.00 636.00 74,01 088.00 00.0( 960. DO 6D.00 720.00 46 Adjust niadhale to grade 8 EA 300.0( 2,400.00 200.00 1,600.00 185.01 1,400.00 200.0 1,600.00 550.00 4,400.00 IT 13" x 12' CSPA, 16 ga 76 L,F 60.00 4,560.00 32.00 2,432.00 60.0 4,560.00 75.W 5,700.00 40.00 3,040.00 13 Type "C ma,kell 11 EA 24.2 266.75 30.00 330.00 27.0 297.00 100.0 1,100.00 25.00 275.00 19 Traffic signing L.S. 23925 2,392.50 1000.00 1,000.00 2250.0 2.250.00 tZ00.0( 1,200.00 2400.00 2,400.00 20 Traffic striping and Painting L.S. 3465.0 3,465.00 4000.00 4,000.00 3300.0 3,330.00 40DO.00 4,000.00 3500.00 3,500.00 21 fetal guard rail 110 L-F 48.4 5,324.00 20.00 2,200.00 36.0 3.960.00 3O.DC 3,300.00 32.00 3,520.00 22 Relocate guard rail 50 L.F 16.5C 825.00 10.00 500.00 17,0 9%. DO Wot 750.00 32.00 1,600.00 23 Traffic signal L.S. 68200.0 68,200.00 5000AO 65,000.00 68000.0 68,000.00 8SO0.00 68,500.00 1400.00 71.400.00_ 57,521.25 275,915.50 $276,267.15 289,418.60 336,523,40 • U • FAU M- P1P,- RI94(2) DATE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • UTILITIES AGREEMENT VINEYARD AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION 8TH ST, TO ARROW RTE, FIRST PARTY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREINAFTER CALLED CITY SECOND PARTY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO„ HEREINAFTER CALLED OWIER I, RELOCATION IS REQUIRED OF CERTAIN UTILITY FACILITES OF CHER, COST OF WHICH IS TO BE BORNE BY CITY BECAUSE THE AFFECTED FACILITIES ARE MAINTAINED UNDER PRIOR RIGHTS AS EVIDENCED BY RIGHT OF WAY DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 31, 1670 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 125, IN BOOK 7490, PAGE 216, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, II, WORK TO BE DONE CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING: • RELOCATION OF FOUR TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION POLES ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE TO CLEAR FUTURE STREET CONSTRUCTION, Ill, OWNER AGREES TO PERFORM THE HEREIN DESCRIBED WORK WITH ITS OWN FORCES AND TO PROVIDE AND FURNISH ALL NECESSARY LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED THEREFOR, AND TO PROSECUTE SAID WORK DILIGENTLY TO COMPLETION, IV, THE CITY SHALL PAY ITS SHARE OF THE ACTUAL COST OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED WORK WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF WNER�S ITEMIZED BILL IN QUINTUPLICATE, SIGNED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL OF O:'!NER'S ORGANIZATION, COMPILED ON THE BASIS OF THE ACTUAL COST AND EXPENSE INCURRED AND CHARGED OR ALLOCATED TO SAID WORK I ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNT PRESCRIIIEO FOR OI'I "ItR BY THE • CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE CITY W LL NOT PAY FOR ANY BETTERMENT OR INCREASE IN CAPACITY OF OVNER S FACILITIES IN THE a^ LOCATION AND THAT OWNER SHALL GIVE CREDIT TO THE CITY FOR ALL • ACCRUED DEPRECIATION ON THE REPLACED FACILITIES AND FOR THE SALVAGE VELI�E OF ANY MATERIAL OR PARTS SALVAGED AND RETAINED OR SOLD BY UWMER, V. AT THE ELECTION OF THE OWNER, PROGRESS BILLS FOR COSTS INCURRED MAY BE SUBMITTED NOT TO EXCEED OWNERS RECORDED COSTS AS OF A SPECIFIC DATE LESS ESTIMATED CREDITS APPLICABLE TO COMPLETED WORK WHERE THE RECORDED COSTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT SUCH BILLING. THE FINAL BILLING SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF AN ITEMIZED STATEMENT OF THE TOTAL COSTS CHARGED TO THE PROJECT, LESS THE CREDITS PROVIDED FOR IN THE AGREEMENT, AND LESS ANY AMOUNTS COVERED BY PROGRESS BILLINGS, VI. DETAILED RECORDS FRM WHICH THE BILLING IS COMPILED SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE OWNER FOR A PERIOD OF FOUR YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE FINAL BILL AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR VERIFICATION BY STATE AND FEDERAL AUDITORS, VII, OWNER SHALL SUBMIT A NOTICE OF COMPLETION TO THE CITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN, VIII. IT IS UNDERSTggO THAT SAID STREET IS A FEDERAL -AID STREET AND, ACCORDINGLY, PHFM 1-4-4 IS HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THIS AGREE- • MENT. IX, OWNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY FULLY WITH ALL OF THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX "A ", WHICH IS ATTACHED AND WHICH IS INCORPORATED IN FULL HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. THIS CLAUSE SHALL BE APPLICABLE ONLY IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE OWNER DOES NOT PERFORM THE WORK WITH OWNER's OWN FORCES, ESTIMATED COST TO CITY: $38,280,00 _.. OWNER AGREES TO PERFORM AND CITY AGREES TO PAY FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY BY BY: • APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: nprc�,ur. � Dunn;; tl:v pertera:arxe of this co rtract, the contractor, for it =c9 f, its aasigar r, Iml -.u'c" sops is .et rest (h.cr('i rift ;r ; arcd In ;,e 'bP "cnc- tractor•') .q;mrn an full,,":: n (1) Cuwpli,mcc nitL IL ud :a :one: The contmetor shall car: p!.: + +ith the Rry;ulnGuns relation to non!iscri:.:in : :tiur in Pwp•rnil} nsSiSC rt! pro;ralrs of for Departwcnt of T:anspor:atiun Title i9. Corte of Frdcral P::rl '_'1, as they rut be amen :L -d from time to Owe, (!:rminclfler rofrrrcd to a the Rg rulatiomr), "hich are horn-in incorl)omwd by reference and made a put of this contract. (3) \'oudisrrin,inution: The cont ftcror, with regard to the "erk performed by It during the contract, shall not discr,ninate on tht grounis of rr,ee, color, or national once in the selection and rctleloon of =ub- contractor including prrrurereents of mutcrinls anti leases of cyulp- mont. The contractor shall not pnrticipnte either dirci or indirectly in the rlicerin,ination pr,hihitcd by Section 115 of the P,e_ulation :a, including rmlilm'avnt practices mhrn the contract covers a- pro'rnm set forth in ,lppcndiN B of Ibr PeAulntione. f..r Std,colOrert It. ludin, Prorun•uu•nt, r.f 1latcri:as u.•u :: n. .. .. ......... ...' in mom pvut�+r i. ut �tn�• .... no-; ctlaUxn m.o:ic !,�, tl.o ro^ :raclor fm "or', to be per.urr :cd a subcontract, inclu+lin, rrncury ::rents of ma;erinls or en_Cs of equip- ment, each potential suhcontra -tor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of tbo ccstr,lci.r's obliantior.s under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color or national urilmn. (:) Ldonnation :mrl Itrpnrt.<: The contractor shalt prot'ide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or dtrecti)es issued pur =u:. nt thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accoun:s. other sources or information, and its fanlines as mnv LC de4tYminCd by the Rate Highway Deparment or the Federal 11whwi, Ariminis- tration to be pertinent to ascertain compl :arce "It!: such RrgulaIIOnic or directi +vs. llhere anc information required of a contractor is in the exclusive posses =ion of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the Stnte Ilinh"ar Department, or the Federal lligh"'nv Administration as appropriate. ' and shall set forth chat Cffores it has made to obtain the information. (5) Suncliou: for \onvumplianec•: In the evert of the contfactor's non. compliance with the nondiscrimination pro +i:ions of this contract, the Slat, high +vav Department rhall impo -e ouch contract sanctions as it or the Federal flch"at Administrar.on .ia% determine to he appropriate, ineluriing, but not limited lo: (a) withh.olding of patments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor cor..pites, and/or (b) cancellation, termination or suapens,oa of the contract, in "hole or in part. (G) lit orlerr•dion of Pro.i -ion -: Td.e contracor <hall include the prn- vision< of par:y;raph (1) Ihrua,h. (P,) in evrn' subcontract, Including procurements of mall`rlal9 and eiseg of Pnulp'Irnt, unlris CCempt by the !:n,:;!ttl0'I< or r,rr••. U \Pf i,. �Iled p'd -uant thorrtn. The Con. tractor "ill L,ke such nrrr,u "tlh n•<pect to and suhrontrnctor or procuren:ont . :ts the, eta :. - Ilir.!;"aY Drpnr" -.rot or (hr Frdcral IlIch- wny Adm.inistrntion mat direct :.s a neon= of rnforrtr.e such pro - viniunv' mclu•!m�• =,,rani^ for "11,11", 1Lanrr P,,nidod, ho,o%er. that, in 0." cunt it cr,n :n :.tor hccomc :n +ohrd nt, or I,: 0r,.,o•nvd with, liti :.. ^.lion ni'b a .::hrr•.;nctor ur :.. tidier a msull of >.:r h directir.r, the cur.'r:rrror rr,+ rr ^. ;rat Oe >znt, IL�6v. a. Dcp,.r ;cent to enter into ouch howanvi to prU0.Tt Oc :ntrn•,t of the ?fate, and, in addition, the contractor may request the Cctwul Mate' to enter into such litigation to prot,rt the Interests of thr, 1'nited States, 1 1A �TCCOPDIN. PEGu E.TED aY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY WREN P[COPOEO M.VL TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY • —Scans ABOVE THIS LINE [OP N.mmm.EP'[ VSE ow[mw rwmn ru I LpMO A rILL YW[ M MIBII Pro P0. arlrRral�WfpS IIraWYM� 11 hHtW f[ILW LOIrLW U14MIM OI W L0. ,oration: City of Rancho Cucamonga �I A.P.N. 209 - 013 -01 209 - 013 -12 209 - 013 -11 209 - 013 -1A 209- 013 -13 209 - 013 -17 JOINT USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 19 by and brtHeen SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, • _ a tion, hereinafter called ^Conpany ", and the CITY OF RANCHO corpora CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter called 'City", •� W I T N E E S E T H: THAT WHEREAS Company is the owner in possession of Car- rain tights of way and easement for electrical facilities by virtue of the following easement rights: ' ♦1' That certain Grant Of Easement from Leon P. Lucas, Jr.r ? Norma R. Lucas, Anthony D. Lucas and Nellie M. Lucas dated a,.. July 20, 1970 and recorded July 31, 1970 in Book 7190, page 216 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino; hereinafter referred to as *Company's —" Easement'; and o- WHEREAS City has acquired easement rights for street and purposes for the con st[uction andrdi improvement of Vineyard Avenue in said City, County of San Bernardino, State of California, Avenue hereinafter referred to as "highway right of way ", as shown on the print attached hereto, marked ^ t A" and hereby made a part prn hereof which said highway r. ghc of f way way is subject to Company's ease- ment; and WHEREAS COnPany's fJcilities as now installed and located on said highway right of way will interfere with or obstruct the cooatrurtion, reconstruction, maintenance or use of said street or highway, and City desires to eliminate such interference or obat"r- tion; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the nutoal covenants her^tn contained, Company and City do hereby agree J.^. fO1IVN3: • �I • Joint Use Agreement S.C.E. CO., a corn„ dad the City of Rancho Cucamonga a municipal corp. of the State of California Serial fio. 55106A The location of company's easement insofar a, it no- lies within the said highway right of way, be, and it hereby is, changed to the strip of land within said highway rig'nt of way, hereinafter referred to as 'new location', and shown and designated as 'area in Joint Use Agreement' an said print marked 'Exhibit A'. City hereby agrees to pay for the total actual cost of relocation incurred by Company for relocating its facilities from Company's easement and reconstructing the same in the new location, including, but not limited to, the cost of acquiring any easements or rights of way over private property. In consideration of the payment to Company of the cost of relocation as aforesaid, and upon acquisition of any and all ease- ments over private property as may be requited for the relocation of Company's facilities to the new location, Company agrees to rear- range, relocate and reconstruct within said new location, any of its facilities heretofore or now installed pursuant to Company's ease- ment within said highway right of way. Company errtiy consents to the construction, reconstruction, maintenance or use by City o' a street or highway over, along and upon Company's easement, both in the old location and in the new location within laic highway right Of way, upon and subject to the terms and conditions herein contained. City acknowledges Company's title to Company's easement in said new location and the priority of Conpany's title over the title of City in said new location. Company has and reserves the right and easement to use, in common with the public's use of said street or highway, said new location for all of the purposes for which Company's easement was acquired, without need for any further permit or permission from City. Except in emergencies, Company shall give reasonable notice to City before performing any work on Company's facilities in said new location where such work will obstruct traffic. In all cases, Company shall exercise due care for the protection of the traveling public. in the event that the future use of said highway right of way shall at any time or times necessitate a rearrangement, reloca- tion, reconstruction or removal of any of Company's facilities than existing in said new location, and City shall notify Company in writing of such necessity and, agree to reimburse Company on demand for its costs incurred in complying with such notice, Company will provide City with plans of its proposed rearrangement and an esti- mate of the cost thereof, and upon approval of such plans by City, Company will promptly proceed to effect such rearrangement, reloca- tion, reconstruction or removal. Company .shall exercise due care for the protection of the traveling public. No further permit or peoarssion from City for such rearrangement, relocation or recon- struction .;hall be required and City will (1) enter into a Joint Use Agreement on the same terms and conditions au air herein act forth covering any such subsuqucnt ralocation of Connany's facilities ',thin said hnghway rights of way, (31 provide executed document(s) yrantarig to Company a loud anJ sufficient easement or easements over wrivecc property it necessary to rvpl�ce 'o min %nY's easement nr any part thnleof, and (l) Ceiobum: :l nap any for any costs which it may be rnyua rnu to expend to ac,pnr• cucl. a cement or ea c^nente, pto- viden it is mutaalli oUr,ed in writing that Company shall acquire uueh v,isllnent or Carvinents. • Ci'.Y ,greca to re Vibu;se Corp.,ny fn, .iny iota forpnny nay suite, a -•n. it -i✓ of any Lock of dr 1x0CC in _it.y'3 title to sold new `.C_� �� I/ Joint Use Agreement • S.C.E.CO., a corp., and the City of Rancho Cucamonga a municipal corn. of the State of California Serial No. 551064 location or any subsequent location within said highway right of way, or in the title to any easement provided by City over private property, to which Company relocates its facilities pursuant to the provisions hereof, and City agrees that if Company is ever required to relocate its facilities because of any such lack of or defect in title, City shall reimburse Company for the cost of relocating its facilities and any other reasonable costs arising therefrom, such as, but not limited for costs to acquire any right of 'day required for such relocation. City shall not reimburse Company for any loss caused by Company's own fault or negligence. Except an expressly set forth herein, this agreenent shall not in any way alter, modify or terminate any provision of Company's easement, Both City and Company shall use said new loca- tion in such a manner as not to interfere unduly with the rights of the other. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as a release or waiver of any claim for compensation or damages which Company or City may now have or may hereafter acquire resulting from the con- struction of additional facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either City or Company in such a manner as to cause an unreasonable interference with the use of said new location by the other party. City agrees that Company's facilities shall not be damaged by reason of the construction, reconstruction or maintenance of said street or highway, by the City or its contractors, and that, • if necessaryr City will protect Company's facilities against any such damage, at City's expense. Company shall have the right to trim or ton any tree or trees which may grow in said new location in said highway right of way, and which in the opinion of Company may endanger or interfere with the proper operation or maintenance of Company's facilities, to the extent necessary to prevent any such interference or danger. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Company and the City and their respective succes- sors and assigns. • -3- . Joint Use Agreement S.C.E.Co., a corp., and the City of Rancho Cucamonga a mur.impal corp. of the State of California Serial No. 553U6A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed in duplicate by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the day and year herein first above Written. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By C. J. Loveri.on, Jr. Manager of Right of ;Jay and Land By Assistant Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA • acces STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this day of 19 before me, A Notary Public in and�or said State, pe ,...ally appeared C. J. Lowerison, Jr., known to me to be Manager of the Right of Way and Land Department of Eovthern California Edison Company, the corpora- tion that executed the within instrument, known to me to be the per- son who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation herein named, and acknovladged to me. that such corporation executed the same, pursuant to its by -laws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) .u. COUNTY OF W5 ANGELES ) On day of 19 before me, a Notary Public in and er said State, personally appearetl known to me la be an Assistant secretary of southern California Edison Company, the corporation :hat executed O.P. Within instrument, known to ne to bu the ner:on who executed the Within instrument on 0,•half of the Corporation herein named, and aCknnwledged L. ;;e that ;uch ..['•oration nA ^a.a •!d th,", samo, pur::uant to its by -llwu ur a r•!s0lutin11 .f rim hoard of • A Lot // I f I fl', 4i 0li Ic p �Q au , SCALC 1 "SCO` J l r� LEGEND Ak, n ,nr JOW7- usE a'cOBEF;.•a-vr- j O._'DO? rd 5 7 j TWt: r9tlN rl, rori i`;pr t(�if'przr.i irna' „owrii 0,, 11.T Al” '. '.�i!C.4.A A1, A r'. i n4� n;;;l;fucu r,ulr,.'.ACE nPnf!r U? ANY ursilNlrl'NT. Jl17 ;' SER..Sr /oLA "1 SOnlhrah C;Jrlmn:o fdrSrM CMnnanf• C}_� E u El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 30, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Destruction of City Documents 9 r Z O z D � Z F' D 1977 1 Attached for Council's consideration and approval is a resolution which authorizes destruction of certain city records. This is the first time any city department has requested council authorization to destroy city records. However, this is just the beginning of a continuing process to purge unnecessary documents. Soon after incorporation, the City retained the services of a consultant to help staff set up a records management program. Included in this program was a retention schedule for all documents which was in compliance with the Californi Government Code. Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approve by the city attorney and the city council. Under consideration at this time are all personnel applications which are two years or more old. There is no need by law to retain personnel applications for more than a two -year period. Thus, purging them from the active files will give us much needed file space. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 82- granting authorization to destroy all personnel applications which are two years or more old. BA:ba attach. 7 34M. Destructlan of city records; excepted records: construction Unless othent'iae pmvidrvl by Joel with the npPmsnl of the 119iAtlire holy. by . rasolnlion nup [Ix u•ritk'p. rnn nr n( the e.tr_ath,mey the head of a citz depart. meat in i- destroy any city meord, dornment, instnmuvh hoot: or�mlMr`nnder his charge, action, mnking_I tvp ?_Ihenot, after [hp s:nne is - n o longer ctmuirej. This section Jena not :mtlmri R th, dcstrucUOn of (a) Records affecting the title t0 real prlarly or liens thereon. (b) Cmlrt records, let Itecorlls stored to ho kept by yhuab•. (d) R coNS less than a e s two years old. (e) The ceirntis, oNinnnrns, pr my.lnlions of the legislative hody or of It city board or commiyylon. This section shall not Ix• construed as limiting or qualifying in any manner the authority provided in ,yetiml Usmo.. -. for Iho deRruetion of rel�Ny, documents, In. lIcUlaea L. Iamks cold pnporn In accordance ]pith the• frnwdnre therein prescribed. (Amended by Sted.19i3, c. it%. p. 581, 1 l.) 1915 Amendment, suntltuted two for flan w'a sought. under the melntaken Ids - rive Ine]u w. ldt. pre]Tlnnn the, the rec d] 'e n than Forml: . ee West.] California Cale five )'ears old and no Inner ruseful, when Forms, Gm11..eY l m feet he —nation ulo —izeu asm,.c- tion or r orde less than . o Years old In vlolation of this asclon. People v. Zamora 119Am 161 C.LHptc Si5. 615 P.:d II61. Ldea to Hoag Any Oil, ¢eoM, d0cument, Instrument, Amok r paper t co i d by the . ep- In general t lien. 1. cols section mgrtee destroyed ey e come• er orlpinel, ....It.... a Oly department head proOded he obtains o—w—, 6 the ...rest of the 11O.I.11.'e body ey -a- Esupttans, In ..nerd 3 cation aM also the I,tl.n consent of the _, .A y attorney. 61 OPsltyU F en. 301. 9} 1. Ia penersl 2 E .... Iene —In a.nereal State rotdd not Justify destruction of tin- If any of the a cer.onn m this ..,U. slslned citizen complaints yPlnat penes .flat the necoM m.Y t we dntroyed ua- .fHIa,rs by rt)..n.a upon this tion ..I. lee. the lawlielons or 1 SOWS .re complled r Ing II,' -,ti.n of record sna ta—lin On uhbyy the city officer h.vmr, eurlMy of hY CRY council. which apperontly app r roved the -0 rd. 5i Ops.AttY.Gen. 501, 6 -30 6. • and nnweedlnr reVuesl by city pollee 3 — Oople. of eel 1 department for destruction of ml]cNl.neou. p nal...ee}pdens (be records nor`Purpo.a for whicla IN ntree- that befnroelal yre city record b1]ich is Coss. ` .red by the e.reptfnna In this .111na d us- .lroi`ne made .nnfrletained nneiiniieIV. 57 oos.Alty.Gen. 307, 140 -74. wMr. It 11 a not con .ion or thin, allot, or i.II. .....1. ,,are nliinu LJ Undsrllne Indicate. changes or addltmnc by amendment eil 7 Z,n,? • RESOLUTION NO. 82- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERN- MENT CODE SECTION' 34090 WHEREAS. it has been determined that certain City records under the charge of the Personnel Department are no longer required for public or private purposes; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the above - mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling and informing the public; and WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City Department to destroy any City records or documents which are over two years old under his or her charge, without making a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by Resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as •listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; and WHEREAS, said records have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is authorized to allow examina- tinn by and donation to the Department of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Council, any of the records described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, except those deemed to be confidential. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this `day of , 19_ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikeis, Mayor ATTES: , EXHIBIT "A" • 1. City Manager Applications - 1978 2. Assistant City Manager Applications - 1978 3. Community Development Director Applications - 1978 4. City Engineer Applications - 1978 5. Building Inspector Applications - 1978 6. Maintenance Worker II Applications - November 1978 7. Associate Planner Applications - 1979 B. Assistant Civil Engineer Applications - January 1979 9. Public Works Inspector Applications - March 1979 10, Park Maintenance Worker Applications - April 1979 11. Temporary Clerk Typist Applications - April 1979 12. Engineering Technician I Applications - June 1979 • 13. Assistant Planner Applications - June 1979 14. Park Maintenance Supervisor Applications - July 1979 15. Account Clerk I Applications - July 1979 16. Receptionist /Cashier Applications - August 1979 17. Engineering TechnlCian II Applications - August 1979 18. Recreation Coordinator Applications - September 1979 19. Engineering Technician II Applications - September 1979 20. Assistant Civil Engineer Applications - September 1979 21. Plan Checker Applications - October 1979 22. Traffic Analyst Applications - December 1979 • r1 0 23. Assistant Planner Applications - January 1980 24. Assistant Planner Applications - April 1980 25. Associate Planner Applications - June 1980 26. Clerk Typist Applications - June 1980 27. Police Clerk Applications - July 1980 28. Associate Planner Applications - August 1980 29. Plaintenance Worker I Applications - August 1980 30. Assistant Civil Engineer Applications - September 1980 31. Crossing Guard Applications - November 1979 32. Associate Planner Applications - June 1979 • 33. Junior Planner Applications - June 1979 • 34, Administrative Aide - August 1980 35• Recreation Coordinator - November 1979 36. Part Time Engineering Aide - February 1980 37. Associate Civil Engineer - January 1980 38. Associate Engineer - July 1.980 39. All other employment applications dated prior to September 30, 1980. RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET DEPARMENT Personnel FILE CAB. N0. DRAWER NO. I NA" 'ION Sucroenrv's Office SHELF CASE N0. PAG . No. I ° i ' OTHER PRE11.%M) BT /D.1T'd Authelet 9-24 -82 VOLUME (CU.FT.) IHCLUSTIT DAT: S 1978 through 1980 SERIES TITLE(S) F. DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS: REVARKS: 1, City Yanaeer Applications - 1978 2. Assistant City Mana8er Applications - 1978 3. Community Development Director Applications - 1978 4. City Engineer Applications - 1978 5. Building inspector Applications - 1978 6. Maintenance Worker II Applications - November 1978 7. Associate Planner Applications - 1979 8. Assistant Civil Engineer Applications - January 1979 9. Public Works Inppector Applications - March 1979 10. Park Maintenance Worker Applications - April 1979 11. Tom porary Clerk Typist Applications - April 1979 12, En.3ineering Technician I Applications - June 1979 13. Assistant Planner Applications - June. 1979 14, Park 3aintenance Supervisor Applications - .July 1979 15. Account Clerk I Applications - July 1979 16, Receptionist /Cashier Applications - August 1979 17, Enginrerinr, Technician II Applications - August 1979 18. Recreation Coordinator Applications - September 1979 19. Engineering Technician II Applications - September 1979 20. Assistant Civil Engineer Applications - September 1979 21. Plan Chorker Applications - October 1979 22. Traif Lc Analyst Applications - Decembar 1979 23. Assistant Planner Applications - January L980 24. Assistant Planner Applications - April 1980 25. Associate Planner Applications - June 1980 26. Clerk Typist Applications - June 1980 27. police Clerk Applications - July 1980 28. As.snciato Planner Applications - August 3980 29. !Li intan an<c Worker L Applications - August 1980 10, Assistant Civic Engineer App LLCatLons - September 1980 . API'0% 10 FOR M.:;TRCCTION BY DISPOSITION OF BE COROS: ) 1 r(n 'Actt, -then 'f`V 1. CI Y- .1'I'TOPNEY SHELF NO. RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET DEPART'IENT FILE CAB. N0, DRAWER NO. • LOCATION SHELF CASE NO. SHELF N0. PACE NO. '- of 2 OTHER PREPARED BY /DATE VOLUME (CU.FT.) INCLUSIVE DATES SERIES TITLE(S) & DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS: REMARKS: 31. Crossing Guards Applications - November 1979 32. Associate Planner Applications - June 1979 33, Junior Planner Applications - June 1979 34, Administrative Aide - August 1980 15. Recreation Coordinator - November 1979 36, Part Time Engineering Aide - February 1980 37, Associate Civil Engineer - January 1980 38, Associate Engineer - July 1980 39. All other employment applications dated prior to September 30, 19810 APPIinUD FOR DLS RUCTION BY CITY ATTORNEY DISPOSITION OF RECORDS: •1 Seotember 17, 1982 Beverly Authelet, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 LPW 011. S O" BROWN & NAZAREK z>' : v .'as oa,`c s.'9E 2 nzo 10. VIN E.'s^rs zOa 910 9)15 RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 Dear Beverly: YiEG[u '��5 sJ090 civEC S� vi +' 959 -3�B9 CITY OF R NISTRATCANONGA SLED 1.19eZ AM P11 7ASA1019i12[' 1213141516 A Enclosed herein please find RESOLUTION DETERMINING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS for the above- referenced Assessment District. This Resolution is now ready for consideration and adoption by the City Council and could probably be handled as a consent calendar item, inasmuch as the • action is purely administrative and following the statutory scheme for final issuance of bonds. This Resolution should be considered by the City Council at your earliest convenience. I would appreciate receiving a conformed copy of the Resolution upon its adoption. Very truly yours, Piar F. MACKENZIE BROW FMB:bd enc 1. cc: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer 0 � d ITEM, • RESOLUTION NO. * o � -173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS AND ISSUING BONDS UNDER THE "IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings under the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon the district described in its Resolution of Intention previously adapted for the construction of certain public improvements in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for the issuance of bonds Pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the assessment and diagram in said proceedings has been • recorded with the Superintendent of Streets pursuant to Section 10600 of the Streets and Highways Code, and a notice of assessment has been recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, pursuant to Section 3114 of the Streets and Highways code; and WHEREAS, following the elapse of thirty (30) days after the date of recording of said assessment with the Superintendent of Streets, the Treasurer has prepared a complete list of all paid and unpaid assessments; and WHEREAS, a copy of said list of paid and unpaid assessments is on file in the Office of said Treasurer, and this City Council has duly considered said list and has determined that the same is an accurate statement thereof; and WHEREAS, the aggregate amount of the unpaid assessments on privately owned land within the Assessment District is $8,890,516.26 and said paid and unpaid list above referenced is hereby approved and accepted; and WHEREAS, it is desired, pursuant to Section 8650.1 of the Streets and Highways Code, to establish the denominations of the bonds to represent unpaid assessments on private property and the amount to mature each year which will be other and different than that as provided in Section 8650 of said Code. NO'd, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: CECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the assessments in said unpaid list .which now remain unpaid, and the aggregate thereof, are as shown on said list as on file in the Office of the Treasurer, and by reference made a parr, hereof. 7, ;I Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 3 (a) That in accordance with the proceedings heretofore taken, bonds representing unpaid assessments on private property shall be issued pursuant to said "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ". Said bonds shall be numbered in consecutive numerical order, beginning with the earliest maturity, and shall be numbered 1 to 1778, inclusive, bearing interest from their date at the rate of not to exceed the current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum, and the denominations of said bonds with their respective numbers and dates of maturity are as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. (b) That said bonds may be redeemed and paid in advance of maturity upon the 2nd day of January or July in any year by giving notice as provided by law and by paying principal and accrued interest, together with premium of five percent (5 %) of the principal. (c) Said bonds shall be issued substantially in the form as set forth in Section 8652 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 4: That the bonds shall be signed by the Treasurer. The . bonds and coupons affixed to said bonds may be signed by said Treasurer by an engraved, printed, or lithographed signature. SECTION 5: That all proceeds to pay the costs and expenses of the improvement and incidental expenses from the sale of the bonds shall be placed in the fund as created pursuant to Sections 10602 and 10424 of the Streets and Highways Code, which fund shall be designated by the name of these proceedings and District, and the monies in said fund shall be used only for the purposes authorized in said proceedings. SECTION 6: That the balance of the proceeds from the sale of bonds, as set forth to be a part of the Special Reserve Fund, shall be set aside in a special fund as authorized pursuant to Section 8880, and said monies shall be used in the manner and form as authorized pursuant to Part 16 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", commencing said Section 8880. SECTION 7: That said bonds shall be payable at the Office of the Treasurer, unless a paying agent has been designated. The bonds representing unpaid assessments on private property shall be paid exclusively from a redemption fund created pursuant to Section 8671 of the Streets and Highways Code. In all respects not recited herein, the bonds representing unpaid assessments on private property shall be governed by the provisions of the "Improvement Bond act of 1915". • • Resolution No. Page 3 SECTION 8: A temporary bond or bonds may be issued pending the preparation of definitive bonds for these proceedings and this Assessment District. Until such exchange, the temporary bond or bonds shall, in all respects, be entitled to the same benefits and be secured in the same manner as the definitive bonds. Said temporary bond or bonds shall be signed in the same manner and form as the definitive bonds. SECTION 9: The Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, which last mentioned political subdivision of the State of California is the County which collects taxes, is hereby requested and directed, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8682 of the streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to enter in his assessment roll on which taxes will next become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected, in a space marked "public improvement assessment" or by other suitable designation, the several installments of such assessment coming due during the fiscal year covered by such assessment roll, and that said entry be made each year during the life of the bonds to be issued in said proceedings. SECTION 10: In accordance with the provisions of Section 8685 of the Streets and Highways code, if any lot or parcel of land affected by any assessment is not separately assessed on the tax roll so that the installment of the assessment to he collected can be conveniently entered thereon, then • the Auditor shall enter on the roll a description of the lot or parcel affected, with the name of the owners, if known, but otherwise the owners may be described as "unknown owners ", and extend the proper installment opposite the same. SECTION I!: Said bonds are to be dated the 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. SECTION 12: In the event of any delinquency in the payment of any installment of an unpaid assessment, the City Council covenants with the holder of the bonds that it will cause to be commenced and thereafter diligently prosecuted, court foreclosure proceedings upon any delinquent unpaid assessments. The City Council further declares that all judicial foreclosure proceedings shall be commenced immediately following one hundred twenty (120) days after any delinquency, and that within sixty (60) days of any tax due date, this City Council will Initiate an investigation to determine all tax delinquencies on all properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: 40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 • EXHIBIT "A" BOND PRINCIPAL NUMBERS MATURITY MATURING COUPON (inclusive) YEAR DENOMINATIONS JULY 2NO RATE 1 ) 1984 S 5,516.26) E 2 - 48) 1984 5,000.00) 240,516.26 12.00% 49 - 102 1985 5,000.00 270,000.00 12.00% 103 - 162 1985 5,000.00 300,000.00 12.00% 163 - 229 1987 5,000.00 335,000.00 12.00% 230 - 304 1988 5,000.00 375,000.00 12.00% 305 - 388 1989 5,000.00 420,000.00 12.00% 389 - 482 1990 5,000.00 470,000.00 12.00% 483 - 587 1991 5,000.00 525,000.00 12.00% 588 - 705 1992 5,000.00 590,000.00 12.00% 706 - 837 1993 5,000.00 660,000.00 12.00% 838 - 985 1994 5,000.00 740,000.00 12.00% 986 - 1151 1995 5,000.00 830,000.00 12.00% 1152 - 1337 1996 5,000.00 930,000.00 12.00% • 1338 - 1545 1997 5,000.00 1,040,000.00 11.50% 1546 - 1778 1998 5,000.00 1,165,000.00 11.50% • .rm, - .. ,.. ESCRO't/ 11 :5TRUCTIONS ESCF011 8O 0G-03--:: Sin SELLERS ❑ 9UYERS[ BORRO':lERE❑ OATE.e�to.n tar 2 Ct. ..c .bur 23, 1982 To'. Title Insurance and Trust Company: AddcS, 340 Fourth Street, P. O. Be. 921 San Bernardino, CA 92403 Onorbefore January 3, 1952 ,liwe gill handyou the _um. cf SSO,000.00, 6hmh you yNl deliver when you obtain for mylournmunt a Grant deed in `.aver of the vestee herein, and ihen you can won your Current form of CLTA Ci�';ER'S coloyofove -ce vn lM1 bapllhy m the amount o' S 80, OOC.00 on she real property d ^scribed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as s :town, on na_e ..2" showing title vested in CITY OF RANCHO CCGrvCOSGA, a Municipal Corporation, • SUBJECT ONLY TO. (1) Second -Half macs for the fiscal year 19 62 1983. 2Lovenams, conditions, restrictions. and easements of record, 3) All assessments of record. ♦a.xxa.xaexxxxa + «xx THERE ARE TO BE NO PROBATIONS IN THIS ESCROW. axxx«xxxxxex +...ax xx The closing of this escrow is contingent upon the acceptance of the Grant Deed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. AS A MVICEANDSM ONLY, NMI tHICH TITLE :NSUFANCI: AND TRUST COMPAIJY IS NOT TO BE CONCERNED AND IS TO ,ACCEPT 170 RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY IN CONNECTION THEPEWI:;ir it is understood by the parties that the subject property consists of 21,833.391 square fee. You are to be concurred only with the directives specifically set forth in the escrow instructions and amendments Cl:e ter n, and are not to be concerned or liable for items designated as "me- ..oranda" in the within escrow instructior nor with any ether agranrvcnt or contract between the parties. Ire tern "close of aecvow" is denaed to be the Lace Lhe documents called for ir. h,_, rscr nre roc ceded. .....x..xa.0 xe...,. ..� - ..�,J .,ice —.. ...� .. _.L.... �.,.... G• Conrvnued on P.rge 2 11 13. an nva'. ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS ESCROYI 1:0,820305=' SELLERS ❑ BUYERS ri BOFROC:ERS ❑ San Bernardino, C. DATE Sept_ 29E LEGAL DESCRIPTION That oortion of Lot 34, Reci:e Ster, in the Citv of Par.chO CUes —once, County of San Berrardico. State of California, as c r n recorded in Book 5, Pace 20 of Raps, an the office of the CnCniy ca Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 34; thence, South 890 46' 53" West along the South line of said Lot 220.11 feet; thence North 530 03' 18" East 116.98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the :;Orthwest bovine a radius of 328.00 feet; tt-nce Northeasterly olong said curve _hrough a central angle of 52 52' 12" an are length of 295.28 feet to a tr.ncent line; thence Forth 000 11' 06" East along said taBSent line :.77 feet to the North east corner of said Lot 34; thence South e0 11' 06" West along the East lire of said Lot 329.96 feet to the Point of Beginning. Upon close of escrow, you are authorized to deduct from r our account the following: • WE PAY ALL TITLE AND ESCROW CHARGES IN THIS ESCROW. The GENERAL PROVISIONS primed on the III side of this Page of these instructions are by reference thereto inrprporaed hnram and rr„ de a pert hereof ar d have Lee, r-an and are hereby auproved by the undersigned. Time Is of the essence of these instructions. If this escrow is not In condition to close by the "time limit date" of January 3, 1963 , and demand for cancellation Is received by you from any infinc,pal to she escrow after said date, you shall act In accordance with Paragraph 7 of the General Provisions ormterl on the reverse side hereof, If no demand for cancellation Is made, you will proceed to Close this eitrnw when the principal, have confined with the escrow In Structrere. Any amendment, of or supplemenss to any m t uCnom affecting this escrav must he In wrltiny. 1 will hand You any fonds and Ie,I,VmrntS remnerl t, complete this escrow All documents, halantps and statements due the undersll are to be marled to the address shown below. CITY OF PAFCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation Slgmamre BY;- _ Address _ City Clerk. _ _.Telephone_ .� - �esidcht- City Of Pal Cuca -.onga P. 0. Box 807 Slanauue BY: _ _ Address _Rancho_ Cuca ^once,_ CA_ TelePhone ---- -- Secretary 91730 • • 0 ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS 9E Li CSC90•v'- 0,220305-: Title loswance and Trust Company: San Le_ct rdino, Address 340 Fourth St., P. 0. B.. 921 DATE 4Ant. 23,19: San Eeroc ino, CA 92402 ' I A,c have read and approve the murucdons of CITY OF P .,.C:iC CCC ?J :Ci :Gi., dated Sept. 21, 1992. On or before JarvarY 3, 1993 1've —H nand '; oil the Grant Co.," as called for on Pace "1". a you wet deriver woes vnu c n fie polmv p1 Utle in :mancv disbursed aria woes you ohtlln br mvfoa account the sup o`. $80,000.00, which is to he disbursed as :ellows: 57.24 to SOLOMON R. GOL0149; 21.41 to MORTON 0, DEVOP.; 21.49 to RICNARO ELINDELL •..r.......... u...... WE PAY NO TITLE AND ESCROW CIIARGES IN THIS ESCROW, The GENERAL PROVISIONS 11,1114 on the reverse side of hit page of these instructions are by reference thereto mcorpora @d berem and made a cart hereof and have been read and are hereby asp ...d by the unders....it Time is of the nsseri:e of the,^ vurvllim a If his escrow , not in c.odmon to close by the "lime limit date" of J,inuar'I 3, 1993 :nd demand for cancellation is received by you from any principal to this escrow after Bald date you 11,111 act ru acordanc' wi in (araghIDn I of in' Gen•vaI Provnim i, primed on the reverse side hereof. If no deremd for fdncel at.m) is made, you will place's 11 Ilme this 11cro W When 0e loo,io.1, have Impelled WI Ih the allow Instructions Any amendments of or nplemnnt, to all msiructmns afflicting, this escrow must be in writing. I will hand you any fund: and mslnrments required lu comnh`te Uvs mcuiv All 1 1,, , halances and st alarm ru, due the un,1111ien'd are to De mailed to the address sho,n below. 213 - ,nanre .Altdress i.e .h : — ielennnniL- !; .Aadr'ss ._e ._... r.- _- ...... 9P021 _Telephone'__ e (''RTC:: Cf DEVON AICHARD Page - 3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •P.O. Box 807 'rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: City Clerk EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the (' "Agreement ") is made and entered into this � day of J- y��.Lvw�`L�`' , 1982, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and RANCHO HAVEN ASSOCIATES, a California aeneral partnership (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY has formed an assessment • district under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the state of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvements, together with certain acquisitions of property, which the public interest and necessity require. said assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and WHEREAS, OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terms of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interest; and Lf WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the construction of the proposed improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. OWNER hereby agrees to convey to CITY and CITY agrees and needs to acquire from OWNER that certain right -of -way (the "Easement ") situated on that certain parcel of property in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as set forth and described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property "). 2. The purchase price for the Easement is hereby agreed to be the sum of $30,480.00, said amount payable upon receipt by the parties of money from the sale of bonds issued by or on behalf of CITY. It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all costs of acquisition of the Easement under this agreement are to be spread over benefitted properties in the DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement, OWNER and CITY further agree that CITY will record, at no cost to OWNER, such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and other instruments necessary to effect the Easement as herein granted. 4. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that in connection with any exercise of CITY's rights granted herein, CITY shall restore and replace the surface of the Property to the condition in which it existed prior to any exercise of any CITY's -2- , 0 V ry • s G,? rights granted herein, and shall repair any and all damage to the • land and improvements of OWNER along, above, or adjoining the Property which is injured or damaged in connection with any such exercise, as soon as reasonably possible at its sole cost and expense. 5. CITY shall at all times defend, indemnify, and hold OWNER free and harmless from claims, damages, liabilities, costs, liens, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) or other charges arising from or in connection with any exercise by CITY of any of its rights granted in this Agreement. 6. OWNER reserves all rights to use the surface of the Property for various purposes, including, without limitation, for parking lots, for landscaping and for storage, and to pass vehicles over • and on the Property; however, such use shall not include the con- struction of buildings and /or structures thereon. CITY acknowledges and agrees that its Easement herein granted shall at all times be subject and subordinate to said rights of OWNER, and CITY agrees that any use which it may make of the within granted Easement and any stony drain improvements it may install on the within granted Easement and any repair and maintenance thereof shall not unreasonably interfere with said improvements, utilities and other uses reserved hereby. 7. The tens and conditions of this .Ageement shall run to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal repre- sentatives and all other interested persons. T Cr IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the day and in the year first above written. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO HAVEN ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership By: By: Cadillac Fairview /California Inc., a general partner. Its: - /D / / //� {�/ "CITY" By• �! `l/' Fre ericc L. Stfv s, Jr. Vice President By: Charles B. Caldwell, a general partner "OWNER" -4- 6 4 • • z 11� Z a 7 \�N� I \Thy I �9,rj1 iZ 1 _ 7TH• y'f P-a*�T Q Q V Ih h o�M tlttAlN GM74MF.NT 1 wo 01 LXINT. 10' EA7rrM�p31 EA`7E.NENT ap2EA = 0.351 Ac 5. /1 \01� Y -f H . 9-r i2r-lt-_-r _ _ II WILLDAN ASSOCIATES i0"a I° =200 - -7-12.82 Clry O1 .�'CSGaa,iTr L,.FM rO At, NANCNO CUCAMONGA f S.N CUNAF0N0._A. 92008 —:� _ NT OISTNICT 72 1 PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga A.D. 79.1 NI.-R: CEMENT LINING SPECIALTIES, INC., a California Corporation ASSESSMENT DISTRICT a EASEMENT AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMEVT is made a entered into this �_ day of id 'c,,4, 19, Us by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM09GA (hereinafter referred to as the 'CITY') and CEMENT LINING SPECIALTIES, INC., a California Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "OHNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the tarns and provisions of the "Municipal • Improvements Act if 1917 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways CuL of the State of California, for the construction of :artain public works of improvements, together With acquisition, which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79-0 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said Public improvements are planned and icoated in a manner which is COnpatible with the greatest iaOlic good and the least Private injury; and WHEREAS, the 144ER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree As to the terns of acquisition of the hereinafter describei proyrty interests; and WHEREAS. It IS 1 ?suable that :ITY acquire possession of the following described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT nave been canpletal 19f the assessments confirmed and munles ire avail - sale to pay for the works of improveoents. NOW, T4EREFJRC, IT IS HEREDY MUTUALLY AGREED Hy THE PARTIES • WERCTO, AS FOLLOWS: • AGRv EVENT I. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY agrees and needs to acquire, that certain easenent situated In the County of San 3ernardino, State of California, as set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated. Z. Owner also agrees to permit City to periodically cross its property for the purpose of inspecting and maintaining the drainage structure to be in- stalled within the above mentioned easement. 3. That the purchase price for said easement is hereby agreed to be the Sul of S a1S 00 , said amount payable upon receipt of money from sale of bonds. It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all costs of acquisition of said easement under this Agreonent are to be spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSMENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 4. This Agreonent and the terms and conditions contained herein are subject to a successful confirmation of the assessment and award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds for the DISTRICT. This Agree- ment shall be null and void if the assessment proceedings are not confirmed within a one (1) year period of time after execution of this agreement, and at that time, all Agreements previously delivered shall be returned to the property owner as said OWNER is shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll. 5. Imrediately upon execution of this Agreement the OWNER and tine CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate. deed or deeds and any other instrument necessary as herein so provided. 6. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the hall - gation of CITY hereunder includes consideration to OWNER for all caliensible [tens for the property, including the value of the part taken, improve- ments, If any, casts and any damages to which OWNER may be entitled by law or otherwise. 1. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed off,acting the easment area denanos, in wrlting, that compensation being paid be applied to Ina r!xlstlnl loan. the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall forward that conpen- • :a ti nn to Pie Im net diary for nppl lea [ion to the loan, ni N written notice to to, ,,grslgn el. ( 7 as 8. The terns and conditions of this Agreement shall run to the • benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. 9. Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Oedicate shall be recorded in the Office of the County Reco Her. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 10. This Agreement and this offer shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect if the property to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and offered for dedication for public use by said Ilap or be any separate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. IN WITNESS WNEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the • day and in the year first hereinabove written. CEMENT LINING SPECIALTIES, INC. a California Corporation OWNERS: /y By: Manuel V. Cervantes - President 6y: By: By: By: By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a ,r I 1 U JfR$EY BLVD i • may` PTN 5W4, oc SEC I2- ,TIS,R7W 6d {I �j ELY L o z 673Z- 15, F. R . F.LN oa 8aet-45 AREA= 5005-F. � 0 FXI LINT q.. 20 2 5' R. 0 0 FXI LINT q.. 0 Citv of Rancho Cucamonga F Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 917D EASEMENT AGREE4ENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 701' day of ,1✓!,_ 19 L, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and ELEANOR H. 4ANOALA; CONCETTA MANDALA; TONY V. MANDALA; CONCETTA M. CORTESE and GEORGE L. MANDALA (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the toms and provisions of the - 4dricipal . Improvements Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvements, together with acquisition, which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESS'IENT DISTRICT 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest pablic good and the least private injury; and WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as tO the terms of acquisition Of the hereinafter described property interests; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT have heen tmpl,.td and the assessments confirmed and r,onics are avail- able to pay for the ,mrks of improvements. NOW, T!'.EREO9E, IT IS HEREBY 4HTHALLY AGREED UY TdE PARTIES • II ERETO, AS i71.L9'AS: Page I of 4 • , RGREPIE'IT I. The OWNER hereby agrees to Canvey to the CTY and the : :TY agrees and needs to acquire, that certain parcel of property and right - of-may Situated in the County of San 3ernamdino, State of California, as sot forth and descnpcd in Exhibit "A ", attached 'hereto, referenced and so incorporated. 2. That the purchase prize for Said easement is hereby agreed to be the sun of 5 17 531 said amount rayaote vpon receipt of money from sale of bonds. It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all costs of acquisition of said easement under this dgreenent are to be spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSIENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. It is understood and agreed by CITY that the do parcels shown on Exhibit "W", attached hereto, having 1.199 Acres and 1.209 Acres shall he legal building sites, 4. DINER or their successors in interest, at their option, reserve the right to extend Trademark to Deer Greek Channel and also reserve the right to extend Center Street to OWNERS South property line with a cal -de -sac at the • end of each street. S. CITY agrees that the future extension Of Center Street an O'ANERS property will he located Over the 20 foot storm drain easement being dedicated in connection with this agreement. 6. CITY further agrees that O'ANERS or their successors in interest, will not be required to extend the 42 inch stem drain Easterly from its proposed installation which is to terminate approximately 305.00 feet Easterly fro OWNERS 'blest property line, 7• Should any future City maintenance of the proposed underground storm drain caaSe damage to the then existing surface inprnlo ent5, such improVtIents will be replaced, in kind, at no cast or expense M O'ANER. D• This lj ,e,,ent nul the tors and conditions contained herein are Spblect to o successful confi,matiun of the assessment and award of the con5tructlnn contract 111 the sale of fonds Tor the OISTRICT, This -%9", meat ;hall he null add v0,1 if Me as[MS,edt proceedin3s are not cOnfimed ,,,thin a nne {11 yn_ar por,,d Of time after execution if this Agreement, and it that I,, all A, —Irnt; nrnvlouSly lelil rnI hall be relurne,l to tar prlpert/ .0 Irl 1, 'old '0A4tR It shown qn tan 1015t ngnalitpd tptlntY assrss'tent 'ell. page 1 of t Gr Al 11 9. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the O'.VIER and the • CITY further agree that the CITY dill record at no cost to O'l:ER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other inst riment necessary as herein so provided. 10. It 1s understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the obli- gation of CITY hereunder includes consideration to OWNER for all compensible items for the property, including the value of the part taken, improve - teets, if any, costs and any damages to which O'AYER may be entitled by law or otherwise. 11. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed affecting the easement area demands, in writing, that compensation being paid be applied to the existing loan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall forward that corDen- sation to the beneficiary for application to the loan, with written notice to the undersigned. 12. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executers, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. • 17. Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and this Agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 14. This Agreement and this offer shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect if the property or rights -of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions of the Subdivision 'lap Act and offered for dedication for public use by said Map or be any separ- ate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. • Pane 3 of 4 • 11 HITTESS BdEREOF the parties hereto execute this ARreerent on the day and in the year first herelnabdve wrltten. u O'ANERS: /a iL BY �! ;ton, /JI /lid'. r,•_rJ Eleanor M. aandala C000etta 'landala -a- ,B-- ony� BY: Lorn�c George 'ta ndala By: CITY OF RANNO COCRIONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss q CoL'NTY OF SAN RE RA ARD[AO ) on thin_ .>[:'v day of _.'7�(99 19ez, be- Cnre n Lau rlrs A. Gray, ❑nc yiy ,yuZic, Pere onoTiy' appe.., d ELEANOR M. MANDALA, CONCETTA TTANDALA, TONY V. WNDALA, COW17,iTA :1. CORTESE And GEORGE L. iIANDALA, proved to m on the basis of sntts!actory evtdonoe to by the per;On whn: am ,e!inc,,b,d to this am.trcnent, and ,,mewled Tod that they ,-xecutod it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Ia1L:u a_.� lFl v��; y _ - -_ • !�....'a,n..- ,�.- ,=.u�� lavri., 4, -,', _�i�a{ir iib ilc i i =y EXHIBIT "A" Parcel i oil A strip of land 25.00 feet in width lying within Lot 25 in Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Aeridian, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 3ernardino, State of California, according to maps of Cucamonga Fruit Lands recorded in Soak 4, Page 9 of flaps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County the North line of said strip of land being described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Lot 26 distant Southerly thereon 187.38 feet frail the 'lortheast corner of said Lot; thence 5lesterly parallel to the North line of said Lot 515.00 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of the existing San Bernardino County Flood Control property known as Deer Creek Channel. Parcel 3 A strip of land 20.00 feet in width lying within Lot 23 and 26 in Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, . according to naps of Cucamonga Fruit Lands recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Naps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County the centerline of said strip being described as follows: Beginning at a poini in tha _rst line of said Lot 23 distant Northarly thereon 5.00 feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot 23; thence North 890 35' 33" West parallel to the South line of said Lot 23 a distance of 307.05 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 000 24' 47" West 177.24 feet to the North line of Parcel A hereinabove described. • �Y" W 4Ti JE r t N89* 36'33"' W ,l 67d 10' 307, 05 2W 05' 280 rill AREA = 1.199Ac. A.QFA - 1209Ac. N_ 81 PA RCEL Nr I� E5 278.30' �V 281.88' N N89 °35'13'W �'r�� 614.18' r 2u 5' DRAIN46E EASEMENT h DARCeE�FLITLIRE TRACEMAJ2K 5TREET ~ A 3 m N 1 O ' AREA = 5.559 Ac. "� $ z 1 1 EXHIBIT "A" WILLOAN ASSOCIATES �wu 1 °`100 I°+n'2r16l61 (,'ILT Of I` AwOSp,TALITYU4,i EIIO a °°. r., 7dM ;•aaew.. IIANCNO CUCA110NOA W.°.fFNAPpN0, C�3ta08 61 ASSSMENT DISTRICT IS -1 SE __ 0 PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga A.O. 79 -1 OWNER: Freeway Rochester Thirty Six, a Limited Partnership and Freeway Rochester Thirty Six O, a Limited Partnership ASSESSklCNT DISTRICT 1 257 EASEMENT AGREEMERT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this Le day of Aw✓wH 19, KZ, by and bebrxen the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA%MGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and Freeway Rochester Thirty Six. a Limited Partnership and Freeway Rochester Thirty Six G a Limited Partnership (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the tenqs and provisions of the "Municipal • Improvements Act of 1913 ", being Oivislon 12 of the Streets and Nighways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of tmprovements, together with acquisition, which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCA40NGA ASSESS'IENT DISTRICT 79 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and Icodted in a manner which is conpatible with the greatest public good and the least private inJory; and WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this tine to agree is to the terns of acquisition of the hereinafter Ids,:ribed property interests; and WHEREAS, it is desirable Gila[ .ITY aequtre possession of the fol lnwin; Described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT have hnen completed and the assessments confirmed and monies are avail- ably to pay for the work; of improvements. 'IOW, THERF.InRE, II IS 'I,PM •1'IT'DALLY AGREED NY THE PARTIES • HERETO, AS PILUUS: % P 0 .AGR En1EiT ,. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY agrees and peels to acquire, that certain parcel of property and right - of -way situated in the County of San 3ernardino. State of California, As set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, referenced And so incorporated. 2. That the purchase price for said easement is hereby agreed to be ww the sum of 5 _}} -g;3^. rya y said amount payable upon receipt of money from sale of bonds. It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all casts of acquisition of said easement under this Agreement are to be spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSMENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. This Agreement and the teens and conditions contained herein are subject to a successful confirmation of the assessment and award of the • construction contract and the sale of bonds for the DISTRICT. This Agree- ment shall he null and void if the assessment proceedings are mat confirmed within a one (t) year period of time after execution of this Agreement, and at that time, all Agreements previously delivered shall be returned to the property owner as said OWNER is shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll. 4. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the OWNER and the CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other instrument necessary as herein so provided. 5. It is understood and agrees by the parties hereto that the obli- gation of CITY hereunder includes consileration to OWNER for all compensible items for the property, including the value of the part taken. improve- ments, it any, costs and any damages to which PWNER may be entitled by law or uthernise, 5. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed affecting the eas„nent eQa demands, in writing, that compensation being paid be applied to the rxrsbng loan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga snail forward that denied- • sat wn to the beneficiary for applicatinn to the loan, with written mots re to th,, upderstgned. — —7' 0 7. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, eNecotors, administrators. Successors. assigns, legal repre5entatl V'S and all other interested Persons. 8 Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 9, This Agreement and this offer shall become null and void and be of no further farce and effect if the property or rights -of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and offered for dedication for public use by said Map or he any separ- ate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the day and in the year first hereinabove written. Freeway Rochester Thirty Six, Freeway Rochester Thirty Six B. a Limited Partnership A Limited Partnership OWNERS: By: 4J .1y "T'e ,Lew✓ By: OWNERS: OWNERS: By. — By: By: By: _. By: By: By: By. By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWONG4 9y: • JAN 2G 9 WW AH T PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga A.O. 79 -1 OWNER: Rochester Freeway North. Ltd., a Limited Partnership ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1 237 and 253 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of , 19, _, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY") and ROCHESTER FREEWAY NORTH, LTD., a Limited Partnership (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the terns and provisions of the "Municipal • Improvements Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvements, together with acquisition, which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and , ' WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terms of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interests; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT have been completed and the assessments confirmed and 'monies are avail- able to pay for the works of improvements. HOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED BY TIME PARTIES • HERETO, AS FOLLMS: 5 J� �� AGREi E'IT • 1. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY agrees and needs to acquire, that certain parcel of property and right- of-way situated in the County of San Bernardino. State of California, as set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated. 2. That the purchase price for said easement is hereby agreed to b/"Y// Sc,4i,1,•, the sum df S 4> 4 said amount payable upon receipt of mo fro, sale of bonds it is hereby further acknowledged and approved that costs of acquisition of said easement under this Agreement are to be spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSIENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. This Agreement and the terns and conditions contained herein are subject to a successful confirmation of the assessment and award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds for the DISTRICT. This Agree- ment shall he null and void if the assessment proceedings are not confirmed within a one (1) year period of time after execution of this Agreement, and at that time, all Agreements previously delivered shall be returned • to the property owner as said OWNER is shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll. 4. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the OWNER and the CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other instrument necessary as herein so provided. S. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the obli- gation of CITY hereunder includes consideration to OWNER for all conpensible I tens for the property, including the value of the part taken, improve- ments, if any, costs and any damages to which OWNER may be entitled by law or otherwise. 6. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed affecting the easement area demands, in writing, that compensation being paid be applied to the existing loan the City of Rancho Cucdnonga shall forward that canpen- sation to the beneficiary for application to the loan, with written notice to the undersigned. • J 1. The tens and conditions of this Agroment Shall run to the benefit of and shall he binding upon the oartieS hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. S. Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall be retarded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds. CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 9, This Agreement and this offer shall bec one null and void and be of no further farce and effect if the property or rights -of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terns and provisions of the Subdivision Nap Act and offered far dedication for public use by said Map or he any separ- ate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. • IN WIT9ESS '.HEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the day and in the year firs t hereinabove written. Rochester Freeway North, Ltd., a Limited Partnership By :OCCIDENTAL LAND RESEARCH, 'cncraa ear t Der BY: s _ o H. Decker By: By: By: By. CITY OF RAMCHO CUC,%MCi 9 PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga A.D. 82 -1 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of __, 19, _, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and RICHARD H. WAGNER, as trustee for the Wagner Community Property Trust; GEORGE R. LENNEY; WILLIAM H. STONE: OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation; RICHARD A. MEREDITH and JACQUELINE MEREDITH; MARGARET A. ROSS, trustee; JUDY LEE INGOLOSBT; WILLIAM P. 14GOLOSBY; CLAIRE L. STONE (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvements, together with acquisition which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 • (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terms of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interests; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT have been cenpleted and the assessments confirmed and monies are avail- able to pay for the works of improvements; and WHEREAS, City is prepared to institute condemnation proceedings in regard to the Easement Area, and to this end, as obtained a litigation guarantee from Title Insurance and Trust Cenpany; and 'AIIEREAS, in view of the threat or iivninence of Condonation, and the costs to both parties att mlant thereto, the parties deer it advisable to rrvjach in aln:rnunt by which City will acquire the Easement Area. • :NW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED RY THE PARTIES HERETO, AS FOLLOWS: h he a9rppS pnP P JHifR r ;iGq n•E•rT eb �:.1 I f.1 51 tua taeds to ac9uI, agrees . <en e and set pn ath ePd ^the Count [hat Perta rnv y tv the C rf zJ rdt�esf ryyp0'nyfXf San aergaryinn <r v`OrPp"t/ 1hIe Sbq Of Thdt the Pll" b([ ..A., attaCn State or Cal frO,7 so ' �iaT heip Pr ([p f ed heap tP r le Of fi Or sa P. djl e, PttSeie hpa bby ru, oraa[R thg lid, e, ^ots°rd amount pI 4b� is hereby ay in the Agy44 ent " ^ °pr th1, d and roa I .Clear of . 0, roceyP. ail a ...., +. 5pblect Th YS A9apolSTR7, Pbr9ua�P n2 are to vya that all coy dversp In lennstruft CPPe[o "4PSSf'i ell, [onfa the tP1ns oa ode Orovi s rvns uo ave neffte0y r be Nfthi Ua!! be ^ell raot dnd the 5 °Liao 9f the ao ^nt Irons ...... y. a "� at ^that n4. Year AOr ?oa rf the Pas ft, ands for it he CIS ano agar° ofre in a [o th of lent TRICT Ihp asspsip PrOPPrty �nerl A9rgt�ent5 Pr�P after pX erOCP.�rn9s arg 7h is a9rPP- J rknt roll. as se id Ell ey10ps lY Celivflan of th(s A ^PL [Pefft,7ed Clty f !^eaedfatel is shoMn on efed Shail p"O'e ^tr be lrrpr ocablher 49ree that PP°n exe[P tion the latest e9ua[re"", the c necessary as he fe to so GPtl j<a to, 17 IvilI coral°t9rpa"P ^t the G4 rzpd c� °tY R It Yat'In o•thp Ty raorpunde t a, dyrped yy r[hp MS anCnany other onst umOch the Ia4 Or vthe:y�se CPS is one anylrtad a9Pfhe ^vaoue oaf �ro "I" OYRER rfor oral the obi,- D,yp s tP part sot forth 'ER hereby efi rch ONh t taken. °"Pe4sible in l "'her r. FR m M imPr _ oPrf Arty rro" C t Z above, dr 5 ri''/ to rIP' dy entitled by o a1I Pavpvut, ROCK COMn4Ny, ect1Y rota a (ns it S.J.arl (ot .t G, Wth rn Che area �IryER fu rthr,r a..,ir 084ER..i of fatal d a, P' rv9up, is Cit Pu r[hase of TP Pet t tG On the keSt I, dpp,y the cast the ass rssnpnt , v .. s. ::...:i .r ... ,..n :y,;a.h :: �v ..:- .o:rr''vr:.�- .q�d.;.....:q ... .....•..:.. ^e+.' a.r- wes�:a stM^tpp,�. NkYewga. to 7. In the went the beneficiary under any hest deed affecting the easement area demands, in writing, that compensation being paid be applied to the existing loan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall forward that cmpen- sation to the beneficiary for application to the loan, with written notice to the undenignwl 8. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall me to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. 9. Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 10. This Agreement and this offer shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect if the property or rights -of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and offered for dedication for public use by said Nap or be any separ- ate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. IN WITIIESS WHEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the day and in the year firs t hereinabove written. OWNERS: OWNERS: Oltmans Construction Co., a Corpora do / By: ritai u2g�.- ey: - i a�-Y! �s—k YO. L crams, . Judy Lea Ingo l ds by ' i Nl i I iam P. Ingol ds by Claire r, none • r 1 L. J By ac „rG!�iG ue ,ne Mered, ch Ha rga rev A. Aoss CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA • Mq'(LH LING ye F -WialT "A" c 1 24 Z,L�OT,y� 2%I LOT 45 279 Nei °4o'4y\v I) It AREA = 1.83Ac. 293 LOT 4 2y4 L0-r 48 r5o'42w 66•�O 6-50.06 '31` N_N"_09'18'[ J - L 2400' — Ij1. L= 37.74' T= 24.05' �1'13'1V ACS L WILLDAN ASSOCIATES iw NOSVirwtt . CA. W o SAN -624M 141. G 9240! (711)- BN_214] «uru e�t_A_I 243 L.o-r 41 s ]',tfm 244 N LoT 42 I$ 245 I LOT 43 i' MAT6H LINE 966 ApvvE LEFT �II.2�i81 I I c1tT Of p pWp, RANCHO CUCAYONOA •a,[a 1112 I IL S E DI VENT OI STRICT gi -t c- A= 21.27'21 2y2 VI W LoT 46 LM7 70,135' T= 56.64' � � U O N 1 ?. I) It AREA = 1.83Ac. 293 LOT 4 2y4 L0-r 48 r5o'42w 66•�O 6-50.06 '31` N_N"_09'18'[ J - L 2400' — Ij1. L= 37.74' T= 24.05' �1'13'1V ACS L WILLDAN ASSOCIATES iw NOSVirwtt . CA. W o SAN -624M 141. G 9240! (711)- BN_214] «uru e�t_A_I 243 L.o-r 41 s ]',tfm 244 N LoT 42 I$ 245 I LOT 43 i' MAT6H LINE 966 ApvvE LEFT �II.2�i81 I I c1tT Of p pWp, RANCHO CUCAYONOA •a,[a 1112 I IL S E DI VENT OI STRICT gi -t c- 0 W Q Ce w N W z U Q PA 0 C'J° • PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga A.O. OZ -1 OWNER: Land Equities, Inc., a California Corporation ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: 1240 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this Q6t day of 19,q by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA (hereinafter referred to as the 'CITY') and LAND EQUITIES, INC., a California Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the terns and provisions of the "Municipal Improveaents Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain puhllc • works of improvements, together with acquisition, which the public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT UISTRICT 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'DISTRICT'); and WHEREAS, said puhllc improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private Injury; and WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terns of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interests; and WHEREAS, It is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the proceedings for the DISTRICT have been conpletel and the asse55ment5 ennfirnnl and monies are avail- able to lay for the work of improvements; and WHEREAS. City is prepared to institute condetnation proceelings in regard to the Easement Area, and to this end, as obtainel a litigation guarantee frnn Title Insurance and Trust Conpnny; and • 'WHEREAS, in view of the threat or imminence of CnMennatbsa, and the costs to both parties ettendaet thereto, the parties dean it alv!SaM a to reach an agreewnt by which City will acquire the Easement Area. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREOY MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES �� HERETO, AS FOLLOWS: AGRE.4IENT • 1. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY agrees and needs to acquire, that certain parcel of property and right - of -way situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, referenced and so Incorporated. 2. That the purchase price for said easement is hereby agreed to be the sun of $ 12,959 , said amount payable upon receipt of money from sale of bonds. It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all costs of acquisition of said easement under this Agreement are to be spread over Y- nefited properties in the ASSESSMENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are subject to a successful confirmation of the assessment and award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds for the DISTRICT. This Agree - sot shall be null and void if the assessment proceedings are not confirmed Within a one (1) year period of time after execution of this ,Agreement, • and at that time, ail Agreements previously delivered shall be returned to the property owner as said OWNER is shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll. e, Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the OWNER and the CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other Instrument necessary as herein so provided. 5. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the obli- gation of CITY hereunder Includes consideration to OWNER for all compentible (tens for the property, Including the value of the part taken, Improve- ments, if any, costs and any damages to which O'ANER may be entitled by law or otherwise. 6. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed affecting the easement area demands, in writing, that compensation beirg pile. Se applied to the existing loan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall forward that conpen- sation to the beneficiary for application to the loan, with written notice to the undersigned. • • 7. The terms and conditions of this A9reenent shall run to the benefit of and shall be bindi nvg upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other Interested persons. R. Upon execution of this A9reenent, and Irrevocable Offer to Delicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confinaation of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 9. OWNER hereby requests CITY to apply the cost of full paveout, within the area adjoining Lot 39 on the 'West to the assessnent on OWNER portion of Lot 39. lo, This A9reenent and this offer shall became mill and void and be of no further force and effect if the property or rights -of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions of the Subdivision Rap Act • and offered for dedication for public use by said Map or be any separ- ate offer of dedication theretofore or thereafter made. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the day and in the year first hereinabove written. LAND EQUITIES, INC., a California Corporation OWNERS: Ry — — 1 oe�xv i< vs.iir.,r By: _ Li won a. KAp w, seat r'+n7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA • :1 EXHIBIT 'sA'f That portion of Lot 39, Iap of Rochester, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Cm,inty of San 3arnardino, State of California. as per nap recorded in Rook 9, page ?0 of ;laps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County lying Westerly of the folloring described line: 3eginoing at a point in the 7orth line of said Lot 39 'lortb 39' 43' 11" • East 60,00 feet fron the North4est corner of said Lot; thence South 00° 09' 18" West parallel 4ith the hest lime of said Lot 113.68 feet to the beginning of a tangent curie caocio.t 'Lsterly having a raiius of 610.70 feet; thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 200 20' 24" an arc length of 216.55 fret to a point in the South line of said Lot said point being Eastarly 21.97 feet fran the Southwest corner of laid Lot. • `7/1/ I N 8 I K AREA 2 0.39Ac. o N � � 4 N ti 1 8' 2� x sv� coz !2 9 i�pT 3� NSS *42'23 "E_ j^ WIILOAN ASSOCIATES, 'f4E oAre \ SANOSwrpurrvl.,,TE UO City Of (701 14-11 1gyp. 92409, -,t, erg °�90°"' RANCHO CUCAMONGA (7141- 824 -21x7 :ntcnco er ,ce µ, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TS•1 JCS R ! ' y0 f 60' M890 '17"E I I v� m � m 1 / n • UGC 1- ;-.�� ; -: �I I K AREA 2 0.39Ac. o N � � 4 N ti 1 8' 2� x sv� coz !2 9 i�pT 3� NSS *42'23 "E_ j^ WIILOAN ASSOCIATES, 'f4E oAre \ SANOSwrpurrvl.,,TE UO City Of (701 14-11 1gyp. 92409, -,t, erg °�90°"' RANCHO CUCAMONGA (7141- 824 -21x7 :ntcnco er ,ce µ, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TS•1 PROJECT: Rancho Cucamgnga A.O. 82 -1 OWNER: NINA MANDALA, et. al. ASSES9W %.11 :IISTRICT 4102 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 24th day of August 1982 , by and between t'ne CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter r ^£erred to as the "CITY ") and NINA MARDALA, et. al. (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER ".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the formation of an assessment district under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improv events Act of 1919', being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, for the construction of certain public worts Of improvements, together with acquisition, 'which the Public interest and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'DISTRICT'); and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private Injury; and WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terms of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interests; and WHEREAS, it is desleahle that CITY acquire Possession of the following described Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS 'IEREdY MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, AS FOLI -74S: L Page I of e e? ORIGINAL ;0 Ll `J • AGREJIETT 1. The O'ARER lereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the :17v agrees and needs to acquire, that certain parcel of property and right- . of -way situated in the :ounty of San 0ernardino, State of California. as set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated. 2. That the purchase Price for said easement is hereby agreed to be the sum of S 12.03g.00 , said amount payable upon receipt of money from sale of bonds. It is hereby further acknoaledged and approved that all costs of acquisition of said easement under this Agreement are to Y spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSMENT OISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law. 3. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the 7.4hER and the CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other instrument necessary as herein so provided. a. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the obli- gation of CITY hereunder includes consideration to OWNER for all compensibie items for the property, including the value of the part taken, improve - ments, if any, costs and Any damages to which OWNER may be entitled by law or otherwise. 5. The terns and conditions of this Agreement shall run to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. 6. Upon execution of this Agreement, and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall he recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon confirmation of the DISTRICT and the sAle, of bonds, rITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution. 7. This Agreement and this Offer shall hecome null and void and be of no further force and effect if the property or rights -of -way to he acquired, as described in this Agreement. Are shim span my final nap, filed with or submitted to the legislative body for acceptance and approval ,odor t'ns terms And provisions of the Subdivision 12Ho Act • and nffered for dedication for p,bli, vie by •aid Hap or by any separ- ato ofblr of I -di catipn theretofore or thereafter made. , Page 2 of 3 ORIGINAL O's 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto execute this Agreeoent on the day and in the year first hereioaowva_ written. OWNERS: i NinaHandala ' Nma Panda Lao Trustee under the Will of Salvatore Mandala By: also Known as Saa Mandalay Deceased By. By: By: -- CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA • • Page 7 of 7 ORIGINAL _�- I y .. . . City Clerk Cltt OF RANCHO NCMIDNGA R. 0. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this .;LC', day of September, 1982, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and SOLOMON N. GOLOMB, MORTON C. DEVOR And RICHARD BLINDELL (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY has forted an Assessment District under the tenors and provisions of the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913 ", being • Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvements, together with cer- tain acquisitions of property, which the public Interest and necessity require. Said Assessment District is known and designated as the RANCHO CDCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'DISTRICT'); and WHEREAS. said public improvements are planned and located in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and WHEREAS. OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to agree as to the terns of acquisition of the hereinafter described property interest; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of the following described property before the construction of the proposed improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. OWNER hereby agrees to convey by Grant Deed to CITY and CITY agrees and needs to acquire from OWNER that certain parcel of property In the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as set forth and described In Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property "). " Page 1 of 2 1111. .., ,.f 11) "w 2. The purchasa price for sal_ Preperay as hereby agreed to be the sun or Eighty Thcusand :180, -01 Cn l: ors. .ne City will pay this 3" into eecrcw at the time that it r__..':.o naf.ey fr ^n the sale of bonds issued by dr on benalf of the City. City shall select am escrow cenpany for trio purpose of handling the escrow fcr this tf.,l.sacticn. The grant need to " Signed ay Seiler shall be deposited In escf e'n and the City shall deposit all of the funds required fpr this purchase 3t such tire as City received tine mane, form the sale of bonds issued by or on tehair of the City. Escrow shall close within forty eight 1481 hours after City has deposited such f -da with -screw. If the bond ?ali does 0ot take place and the City does not receive the mdney on or before are hundred twenty 11201 days from the date of this agreement, then the deed shall be rettemed to Seller and this agreement shall be of no further farce or effect. It is hereby further ackeov /edged and approved that all costs of acquisition of the Property under this Agreement are to be spread over tenefitted properties in the DISTRICT pursuart to the provisions of law. d. Upon the closing of escrow, the City will record at no cost to owner, the grant deed herein referenced and City will pay all escrow fees, documentary • transfer stamps on the deed, and will pay for its own, title policy. 4. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run to the benerit or, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, admtnidtratara, successors, assigns, legal representatives and all other interested persons. 5. Seller and City acknowledge there is a first trust deed covering the property and upon request of City 5eller will cause a partial reconveyance of the deed of trust so that the property being conveyed to rity shall to free and clear of such first trust deed. i. The property being sold to approximately 21,180 square feet and in the event that It shall later turn nut that the property Sold is morn than 22,r0o square feet. then the price shall be rene5otlated. Attached to the Ulu"', A ntto shed hur�ta is a man ?howlrl In darkened shidows the area being cold he P der r, „oil -r h -rrq n bul vi '.he event of ti- 111111151st I111 tetwnen Exhibit A ini tho sin doll ar a In ^.e ,map, the n , d verM by t'ne shaded srea rn the map .hall pr— iU. • 1111. .., ,.f 11) "w • IN NITN-ss UNEPEOF, 'he 1—till -lo =s., t, this A5^??ment on The day and year filet above vrr-,t, "9'ary EFS^ MOP EV 04 NIC4A 9D Ou II10¢LL "CITY" City of Rancho Coca -.onga R • EXHIBIT "A" • That portion of Lot 34, Rochester, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 34; thence, South 890 46' 53" West along the South line of said Lot 220.11 feet; thence North 530 03' 18" East 116.98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 320.00 feet; thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 52" 52' 12" an arc length of 295.28 feet to a tangent line; thence North 00° 11' 06" East along said tangent line 5.77 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 34; thence South 00" 11' 06" West along the East line of said Lot 329.96 feet to the Point of Beginning. 9 • n� l J Ll i i NE �oR N N89 °48'09 "B �°r-# s � A O 0 z 236 LoT 34 ROCHESTER 0 S 9 n — N / I / WILLOAN ASSOCIATES 55 HOSSTAUTY IL aiEI4 SRN 9EAMMMC, C . . a.m m 11_. 2581. NANCNCO 1 t7 C UOA MONOA 7 79] .1 ZAS$ESSMENT DISTRICT nA � o' M•�.�4,76, 9 -20 aN LyW I w 1 \ aka a�oaC. �: . , x W e 50.17' 50.17' 76.14' 43.G4 30' N89 °4(o'5,VF, 220.11' sE C°q LoT3q WILLOAN ASSOCIATES 55 HOSSTAUTY IL aiEI4 SRN 9EAMMMC, C . . a.m m 11_. 2581. NANCNCO 1 t7 C UOA MONOA 7 79] .1 ZAS$ESSMENT DISTRICT nA � o' • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR STREETS AN STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the City Engineer of said City did acknowledge those certain Offers of Dedication, executed by Cement Lining Spgecialties, Inc.; Freeway Rochester 36 and Freeway Rochester 368, !.imited ntnerships; Eleanor M. Mandala, Concetta Mandala, Tony V. Mandala, Concetta M. Cortese and George L. Mandala; Land Equities, Inc.; Wagner Community Property Trust; Rochester Freeway North, LTD; and Conrock Co. for Assessment District 82 -1. WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the said Offers of Dedication be accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, that pursuant to provisions of Chapter 12.7 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the' Government Code of the State of • California, the above- referenced Offers of Dedication are hereby accepted on this 6th day of October, 1982. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren i4. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon 0. Nike s, Mayor • • • STAFF REPORT? "Qy. C E a F DATE: October 6, 1982 - ti T0: City Council and City Manager 917 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Storm Drain Improvement Agreement and Security for CUP 82 -01 - Etiwanda Investment Company (Pic -N -Save) The subject CUP, located on the north side of 4th Street and approx- imately 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, is submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company. The CUP was approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 1982. The Improvement Agreement and Security have been submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company to guarantee installation of the storm drain improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance: $352,000 Labor and Material: $176,000 Retention Basin Maint. Security: $ 5,000 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of the Storm Drain Improvement Agreement and Security for CUP 82 -01 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Respectfully submitted, L � LBH: JS: jaa Attachments /6/ 'ID 9l\ Py'r6 j' zax ! y i �YaJ j a i�J 2 Po�I • ,Z Poi IS ` If .Zix ♦ ♦� i uo.a V=rA m,uaeae ... xor ve.o O ✓r rre oe•sv nn xar 1 1 Ira.'.r fio a;l 4 t10nn I:o +cr 1 I . z5'ec. � r' ac �i Izu.0 eref .• rm.cl 1 ro.n Izoecr ,af ss n: Nr Pa: 10 rr� - }rl i .p_II nez: �YaJ j a i�J 2 Po�I • ,Z Poi IS ` If .Zix ♦ ♦� ve.o • e� �' . z5'ec. � . n c "_.I.. f . •..f_ Nr Pa: 10 i e1 - }rl i L- C. m��Y PROJECT SITE b�' Par.2 7�. I` IT Lp, TY OF RANCI IQ CUCAN10. \GA ENGINEERING DIVISION V1CINII'Y MAP 0 3 W Oil • RESOLUTION NO. * °• �; ._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 82 -01 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 13, 1982 by Etiwanda Investment Co. as developer, for the improvement of public Storm Drain System within the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of 4th Street, approximately 2300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP No. 82 -01; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk l J Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 7 • lu L i nTmv nC D ATTrun f TV`AMOMf1 A STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement from Lesney Development Company for Tract No. 11350 e0 r 1977 A Lien Agreement for the installation of a median island on Base Line Road adjacent to Tract No. 11350 was approved by City Council on October 21, 1981. In order to secure financing for their project, the lender requires that the Lien Agreement be subordinate to a lien in favor of the lender. Lesney Development Company has submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully submitted, Attachments )J `( • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��{� m • m m t • O O m! �.�iN4 ■y � • O • �• AMA � �� m ..• m title; `,. CITY OP RANCHO CUCA\IONGA w FGItING NGINGDIVISION w T Vim= VICINITY \IAP 1 \`II P 8 ��l a e • RESOLUTION NO. * , . -17 fl, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM LESNY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of a Median Island on Base Line Road adjacent to Tract No. 11350 was approved by City Council on October 21, 1981 and recorded in San Bernardino county on October 27, 1981, instrument 81- 237644; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above- mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordination Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said • Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'Wasserman, City Clerk i� �J Jon D. Mikels, Mayor VA LL A G R E E M E N T • THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of !982, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, hereinafter referred to as CITY and Hotch Bedrosian doing business as RUNMAR ENTERPRISES with the principal place of business at 7 Park Vista, Irvine, California 92714, hereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR. WHEREAS, CITY is involved in Assessment District E2 -1 which requires professional construction inspection services; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of an experienced and quali- fied contractor to provide professional construction inspection services in the area of storm drain construction and street improvement construction; and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR represents itself as qualified and capable of render- ing the required services; • NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the premises the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE 1: SCOPE OF SERVICES CONTRACTOR agrees to provide technical services as requested by CITY for inspection of public works construction project. Such services may include: a. Professional inspection of storm drain construction and street improve- ment construction; b. Preparation and maintenance of field records, diaries and as -built notations on project plans, c. Preparation of material samples for testing; d. Preparation of weekly and monthly progress reports; and e. Completion of related work as requested by CITY. ARTICLE II: DUTIES OF CITY CITY agrees to provide CONTRACTOR with such information as is possessed • by CITY and is normally supplied to contractors performing such services. /67 ARTICLE III: COMPENSATION CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR for services faithfully rendered hereunder. Such payment shall be made at the rate of $16.00 per hour, based upon the number of hours actually spent on inspection and related duties, excludina travel tine to and from the construction site. CITY agrees to compensate CONTRACTOR for a minimum of four hours ($64) for each day the inspection work is performed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement. Upon prior approval by CITY, CONTRACTOR may be reimbursed for out -of- pocket expenses incurred in the performance of this agreement. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree with regard to any such reimbursement as follows: a. CONTRACTOR shall not be entitled to reimbursement for any costs of transportation, insurance, taxes or other benefits. ARTICLE IV: PERSONNEL CONTRACTOR agrees that Mr. Hotch Bedrosian shall be responsible for • providing the services to be performed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement. ARTICLE V: NO AGENCY RELATIONSHIP No Agency relationship between CITY and CONTRACTOR is intended or created by this agreement. CONTRACTOR is not authorized and shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it is an agent, service, or employee of CITY, it being expressly understood that COtI',eACTOR is and at all times shall remain a wholly independent contractor. ARTICLE VI: TIME OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACTOR shall be available for performance of Scope of Services as of the effective date of this Agreement as entered above and continue to perform such services for a minimum of six months from said date or until the project is • -2- • completed. CONTRACTOR's services shall be provided upon CI TI's request and completed in such sequences as to assure expeditious completion of the public works construction projects to which CONTRACTOR is assigned. ARTICLE VII: TERMINATION This Agreement shall terminate on or upon completion of the Scope of Service described in Article I or earlier at the CITY's option, provided that CITY shall aive CONTRACTOR ten days written notice of such termination. In the event of termination by CITY, CONTRACTOR shall deliver to CITY all documents, files, and records pertaining to any r,ork which may be in progress and CITY shall pay to CONTRACTOR all sums due to the date of termination. • ARTICLE VIII: NOTICES Any notice given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed received and effective when properly addressed, posted and deposited in the United States nail addressed to the respective parties as follows: CITY: 9320 Base Line Road P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CONTRACTOR: 7 Park Vista Irvine, CA 92714 ARTICLE IX: NON- ASSIGNABILITY CONTRACTOR shall not assign any interest in this Agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same without prior written approval of CITY. ARTICLE X: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CONTRACTOR agrees that during the performance of this Agreement, it will • not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, -3- creed, color, sex. age or national origin. • ARTICLE XI: AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS No change, amendment or modi cation to this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and sinned by the parties hereto. ARTICLE XII: ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and any agreement, document or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein, integrate all the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersede all oral negotiations and prior writings with respect to the subject matter hereof, In the event of any conflict between the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement and any such agreement, document or instrument, the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. ARTICLE XIII: APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the • State of California. ARTICLE XIV: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in as many counterparts as may be deemed convenient, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original. C, J -4- P10 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONTRACTOR have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. ATTEST: Ll Laurcn 11. Wasserman, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ty Attorney u RUNMAR ENTERPRISES by Botch Bedrosian. Owner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA by Jon Mikels, Mayor -5- 0 s r1 lJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent • l CUCAAI .14/1 C. FI U Z L' > SUBJECT: Authorization to Puichase TWO (2) Mid -Size Pick -Up Trucks for the Assessment District 82 -1 Project Inspectors On September 29, 1982, bids were received for two (2) mid -size pick -up trucks to be used by City Inspectors for inspection on the Assessment District 82 -1 Project. Five valid bids were received and are shown on the attached bid summary. Because of the 45 to 60 day delivery time, it is important that this order be issued as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION 1977 It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to purchase two (2) mid -size pick -up trucks, per attached bid summary, from Mark Chrisopher Chevrolet, Ontario, California, at the bid price of $17,359.98. lly sub{nitted, LBH :1SL: j a a Attachments I;J \J TADOLATIOB or HIDE oDBEDAL DESCDIPTI011 DAM BID BO., PBBPABED th T110 (2) MID -SI::E PC['6 -UP TF'1CKS 9/29/92 4p ITLN DC$CBIPTIOB mid-Size Pick -Up Truck QI ?517, 369y9 $17,755.6 $17,706.0 $17;799.1 $19,064.61 - -- -- - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - - - -- 6 -c} lrnder, Automatic - -- - - -- - - - - -- — - - - _ __ _ — — tr sscon,_Pnaer Sceer- in9. Power Brakes, Air -- -- - - -- - - --- - - - - -- -- —_ Condition — — - DISCOOKT is L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO (2) MEDIUM SIZE PICK -UP TRUCKS 1. YEAR: Current ProducLion Model 19 £3 - 2. CONDITION: New (Specify Make & Model) f4 V, 1j 3. G.V.W.: Not less than 4200 lbs. t-la to - 4. PAYLOAD CAPACITY: Not less than 1500 16s. /S'OS - 5. ENGINE: Six (6) Cylinder A L, a6 V 6 6. TRANSMISSION: Automatic m A" 4 5 PfCd 7. FRONT & REAR SUSPENSION: Heavy Duty FS'1 J. D. Sdce s _ 8. RcAR AXLE: Locking Differential 3.08 Ratio ✓ 9. TIRES: Five (5) each P195/75R -14 W/W ✓ (Spare Mounted Under Vehicle) 10. COOLING SYSTEM: Heavy Duty Radiator and Transmission ✓ Oil Cooler 11. STEERING: Power 12. BRAKES: Power; Front Disc, Rear Drum r 13. PICK -UP BOX: Six Foot Length, Double 'Wall Sides • 14. BATTERY: Not less than 60 AMP HR. 15. ALTERNATOR: Not less than 60 AMP to A w♦° 16. FUEL TANK: Minimum 14 gallons I3. 9_ rye( 17. WINDSHIELD WIPERS: Intermittent ✓ 18. CAB: Dual sun visors, full bench seat, fresh air / heater- defroster, gauges (volt, tempt, and oil), AM Radio 19. REAR BUMPER: Step Type 20. 'WINDG'WS: Tinted / 21. COLOR: White Exterior s/ 22. MANUALS: One Set manufacture shoe manuals to ✓ cover enginer, body, chassis, electrical and oarts 23. DELIVER TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Yard 111 North Grove Avenue Upland, California 91736 24. APPROXI :'ATE DELIVERY DATE: `/I- DAYS Aed^ 0&4rk • I Ll CONMUIITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART ?LENT ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9340 Base Line Road, Suite B • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Bids must be received by 2:00 P.m. and will be opened at that time on September 29, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 HONO.VBLE COUNCIL: In accordance with the established specifications, the undersigned bidder agrees to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with Two (2) Mid -Size Pick -up Trucks, at the following price, including sales tax. Bid price to be exclusive of federal excise tax. Two (2) Nid -Size Pick -up Trucks 50 6 :1 . Cl 9 Each • COMPANY i Ib,1ASA inn ,lARR CP ^IS'J ?F!.It CHEVROLET INC. 9332717 62B-Ed44 Mi :.�i ..D ". TPEET GiilAMC, CALIF. 91764 9 as Fa X13 Cifi' f1 �Nr l n JOE LEGGIO PL6[Y •XO Ly'A9C \I�X.�6[q :131 E "O" 11111T , OnTnP�o. CA 917Rd • )la.9tl ].001] ^1a.923•P93d I I L, 0 BIDDER'S STATEMENT The bidder hereby agrees to provide the auipment and /or material described in the specifications within ,�O calendar days from award of bid. The bidder also agrees to extend price protection for the bid for a period of 30 days. The bidder further agrees that price escalations beyond the period of price protection shall be borne by the City at manufacturer's invoice cost. The City hereby agrees to make payment at bidder's cost for all government mandated equipment requirements enacted after the award of bids which affect the bidder's ability to supply the specified equip- ment. MARK CHRISTOPHER CHEVROLET INC. 933 0017 623 E;11 2131 EAST "D" WEET 0WARIG CALIF, 91751 . COMPANY Sig Notary I / hieO �r�ch.< �'7 0 0 0 J n U !V �Y CIA Cl.c` �r rH �,s w_ CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES (Government Code, Section. 910) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANTS (Government Code, Section 910[a]): a. JOAN M. MASON 2518 Primrose Lane V Upland, California 91786 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONCA r.UMINISTRATICN b. WILLIAM F. VON HUBEN 33025 Sea Breeze Court "D ��j�o2 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Ay PM C. CAROL JEAN VON HUBEN 2518 Primrose Lane � Upland, California 91786 2. ADDRESS TO SEND NOTICE (Government Code, Section 910(b]): Don Fesler, Esq. Lit FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, SCHROETER s DE HAAS 320 North Vermont Avenue Los Angeles, California 90004 (213) 666 -3600 3. DATE, PLACE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF OCCURRENCE (Government Code, Section. 910[c]): On July 11, 1982, at approximately 2:55 n.m. at or near the intersection of 4th Street and Etiwanda Avenue, which inter- section is located within the County of San Bernardino, but owned and /or controlled by more than one public entity, a 1972 Chevrolet Monte Carlo driven and occuuied by claimants' decedents, BEATRICE E. VON HUBEN and WILLIAM A. VON HUBEN, wostbound on 4th Street contacted a semi -truck driven by FREDERICK, K. DOCKS southbound on Etiwanda Avenue, At the time of the incident, the intersection and its adjacent property was in a dangerous condition. Without limitation, the intersection's traffic signals were defective and /or ino_oerative and there were large tiles of dirt located near the northeast portion of the intersection which would obstruct the view of motorists enterinq the intersection. I r�� 4. GENERAI. DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGES (Government Code, Section 910[,]): Claimants, children of the decedents, seek wrongful death damaaes in the sum of $1,000,000 or according to proof, and funeral and burial expenses according to proof. The exact amount of these expenses is not known at the present time. 5. IDENTITY OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (Government Code, Section 9101e]): Unknown at present. 6. AMOUNT CLAIMED (Government Code, Section 910(f)): Funeral and burial expenses according to proof; general damages for loss of care, society and comfort of the decedents in the sum of $1,000,000 or according to proof. No exact method of computinq claimed general damages can be stated under applica- ble rules of law. ' 7. WITNESSES a. FREDERICK K. DOCKS 6012 Earth Street Mira Loma, California 91752 b. MR. AND MRS. HODGE 851 Grand Colton, California (714) 825 -4018 C. HELEN AND MARY SILVA 16029 ivy Fontana, California (714) 829 -7808 d. RAYMOND GONZALES 9315 Redwood Fontana, California C • • 0 e. All other persons mentioned in the police report No. 1162225.11 prepared after the incident, a cony of which will be provided upon request. DATED: Seotember 27, 1982. • � 1 U LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, SCHROETER b DE HAAS Bv: 01vi 64 DON FESLER Attornevs for Claimants • `J 11 CAW OFFICES LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, SCHROETER i DE HAAS �onrvr Dw rou[rtt o.PLn r. �onnson Prorroslonu co6rowwnon PV DO tCM SCNNOCICP 320 NORTH VERMONT AVENUE B.0 .rn...0n LOUis N. D[ Nus P.0. 60 %T.Y16 w if N[U W OCNi3 CHAR. wN tPr,( LOS ANGELES. ULIFORNIA 90001 A. (gANClsco 011M1 gOeCgWw 3}[v[NSON POe(Pi 6. P TELEPHONE 12131666-1600 100 VAN NLSS AV[NU[ DON.�D C..CS NINLTLLnA FORM O[NMi3R wM[S SAN FgwMCOHC(40S)RNlw 14102 Dq[N [wD :Ea�,« :1DHL111 September 29, 1982 Tu [RnoN[plsl azassel ea.rvw auN¢ ST [v[N q NiCq S HAW NCC 6'egOWNL RETCP ". 61n0 .uc.P CIA . Mr clN Nis CERTIFIED MAIL - N, scnuLLP RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 1�.n o� o HurcNlN SON na nous 0000nuL �on.THwn . INc OEn n1s R. sP w REr[R D. xe C R OSCPi C.11C .LI. — City of Rancho Cucamonga Office of the City Clerk Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Claimants Joan M. Mason, William F. Von liuben and Carol Jean Von Huben Date of Loss: July 11, 1982 Our File No.: 94.3737 DCF Gentlemen: Enclosed for filing is the "CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES" filed oo behalf of the heirs of Beatrice E. Von Huben and William A. Von Ruben, including Joan M. Mason, William F. Von Ruben and Carol Jean Von Huben. These claims con- tain all items of information required by Government Code, Section 910; and unless advised to the contrary in writing within seven (7) days, we shall assume that such claims contain all required information and will take no further action. If additional information is required, we would appreciate being advised within seven (7) days so that such may be supplied in a timely mariner. Although not required by Government Code, Section 910, the identity of known witnesses has been supplied. If additional information is requested but not required, we will be happy to supply it, such as copies of the inculved police report and resulting documents. t ro September 29, 1982 • Page Two Absent contrary instructions, we shall assume that we have complied with all claim statute requirements on beh ;,lf of our clients and will await your notification of acceptance or rejection of the claims. Very truly yours, LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, SCHROETER $ DEHAAS By _ DON FESLER DCF /ry Enclosure: "Claims For Damages" • r L CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA WARRANT REGISTER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 _V+ 5C4 SEPT. 30. 1982 • DATE WARRANT = VENDOR ALT IV I TY ACCOUNT AMOUNT 9/30/82 102 ABLETRONICS Coax Cable 49-23 -44 S 63.60 9130/82 103 CEMENT LINING SPECIALTIES Right- of -.ay Acquisition 49-23-29 07500 9/30/02 104 CONROCR COMPANY Right -of -way Acquisition 49-23-29 152,944.00 9130122 105 CUCAMONGA CO. WATER DISTRICT. Flat File 49.23-24 150.00 9130/22 106 FIELDMAN,ROLAPP S ASSOC. Professional Services 49 -23 -28 5,609.32 9/30/82 107 FREEWAY ROCHESTER TMIRY-SIR Right -of, ay Acquisition 49 -23-29 74,468.00 9/30/82 I08 LAND EQUITIES INC. Right-of -.ay Acquisition 49 -23-29 12,95900 " 9130182 log LOCRWOOD ENGR. S SURVEYING CO. Professional Services 49.23.28 275.00 9/30/62 110 RICHARD A. MEREDITH Right- of-way Acquisition 49-23-29 199,722.00 JACQUELINE MEREDITH BET$NA C. HOYT " JAMES F. CROSS " ROBERT S. WARRINGTON ROBERT 2. LIECMTI " GARY DONALD LADE GAIL GLASS LACE " RICHARD M. WAGNER " ' 9/30/82 $11 RICHARD MILLS ASSOC. Professional Services 49-23-28 91000.00 9/30/B2 112 PRIDE COLOR PRESS Blueprints 49-23 -23 261.01 • 9130/82 113 R.C. LAND COMPANY Right•Ofray Acquisition 49-23-29 178,439.00 9/30/82 114 ROCHESTER FREEWAY NORTH,LTD. Right -of -way Acquisition 49-23-29 50,465.00 9/30/82 115 TITLE INSURANCE S TRUST CO, Right-of -way Acquisition 49-23 -29 162,876.00 9/30/82 116 WEATHERFORD Coax Cable 49 -23 -44 73.68 DATE WARRANT 0 VENDOR ACTIVITY ACCOUNT AMOUNT ' 9/30/82 117 WILLDAN ASSOC, Professional Services 49 -23-28 5 14,439.00 9/30/82 118 WILLIAMSON S SCHMID Professional Services 49.23-28 959.40 S 063.579.01 l J J . • • STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - WILSON - A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 Single Family Residential - 20,000 Sq. Ft. Lot Minimum) to R- 1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 Sq. Ft. Lot Minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyan Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 251 -63 and 64. Related File: Tentative Tract 10076 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission, after reviewing the proposal and conducting a public hearing on August 11, 1982 adopted Resolution 82 -87 recommending adoption of the above- described zone change and issuance of a Negative Declaration. In conjunction with this zone change is Tentative Tract 10076, a residential subdivision of 19 lots. The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract map and related conditions of approval at their August 25, 1982 meeting. Approval of Tentative Tract 10076 is contingent upon adoption of this zone change by the City Council. Attached is a copy of the August 11, 1982 Planning Commission Staff Report which fully describes the Zone Change request. If the City Council concurs with the zone change, two actions are required; (1) adoption of a Negative Declaration by Minute action, and (2) approval of the zone change through adoption of the attached Ordinance. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in The 0ai1 Re ort newspaper a vercising t is as a public hearing and notices were sen o property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence directly related to the zone change has been received. ' v. Zone Change 81 -04 /Nilson September 15, 1982 Page 2 0 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance approving ?one Change 81 -04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully ubmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ:jr Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Planning Commission Resolution 82 -78 Planning Commission Staff Report of August 11, 1982 • I � J �r. ORDINANCE NO. ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 251 -63 & 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly: Approximately 6.9 acres of land located south of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue from R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential - 20,000 square foot lot minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 square foot lot minimum). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: ROES: ABSENT: d `� 0 7 111 yr neuvunv uuunInvivuen �GUUnn(p ' MEMORANDUM , CI; Y � F ". U" (sn I DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner , BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES - An ordinance establishing public notification procedures for projects requiring Planning Commission public hearing. BACKGROUND: The City Council continued the first reading on this item to allow the City Attorney to redraft the attached Ordinance which includes insertion of new language into the Municipal Code intended to ensure that any Planning Commission action is not deemed void or invalid by reason of any error, omission or failure to give notice. A copy of the September 15, 1982 Staff Report is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and consider all material and input regarding this item and conduct first reading of the Ordinance and Resolution. The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution. Respectfully submitted, P. .., Fity (Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: September 15, 1982 Staff Report CITY OF RA \0 -10 CUG\A10 \GA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City o Rancho Cucamonga, California establishing public notification procedures for Planning Commission public hearings. SUMMARY: Per Planning Commission direction, staff has prepared an Ordinance for Council consideration that would adopt notification procedures for Planning Commission public hearing items. These procedures would require the posting of notices on the project site at the time of filing and prior to the public hearing, and direct mailing of notices to property owners within 300' of the subject project site prior to the public hearing. A copy of the proposed Ordinance, the Commission Staff Report of 6/23/82, and minutes are attached for your review. The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of the ordinance. Council adoption will require two actions: (1) a motion to adopt the attached Ordinance; and, (2) a nation to approve the attached Resolution to adjust the fee schedule. BACKGROUND: The proposed notification procedures are intended to expand our current procedures in order to encourage greater public participation in the review process. Posting notices on the project site will notify residents affected by the project beyond the 300 foot direct mailing radius. Further, posting at the time of filing encourages public input during the early stages of the review process when it can have the greatest impact. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended adjusting the fee schedule to compensate for the additional costs for notification. The figures in the attached Resolution to amend the fee schedule represent an increase of $21 per item. A breakdown of this increase is as folTows: Printed Notices (3 @ 5.62 ea.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ .168 24" Stakes (3 @ 30d ea.) .90 Typing (Clerk Typist @ $5.48 hr. - 10 Min.) .90 Assembling (Asst. Planner @ $9.70 hr. - 15 min) . . . . . 2.42 Posting (Asst. Planner @ $9.70 hr. - 30 Min) . . . . . . 4.80 Mileage (Average 4 Mi. @ 3% ea.) . . . . . . . . . . . 1.20 0.388 X 2 0. 6 i..:i City Council Staff Report Public Notification Procedures • September 15, 1982 Page 2 r 1 U RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and consider all material and input regarding this item. The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:DC:jr Attachments: June 23, 1982 Staff Report June 30, 1982 Memorandum Minutes of June 23, 1982 Planning Commission Meeting Ordinance Resolution 11 CITY OF RANCIIO CUCr.ONGA STAFF REPORT O:TE: June 23, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SU3JECT: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES r9STRrCT: The City Planning staff has prepared a report, per the Planning Commission's direction, on alternatives for expanding our public notification procedures. This report presents a discussion of the various issues and options concerning notification of Sur- rounding residents. AN'LYSIS: The California Government Code requires notification of puoiic hearings involving approval of tentative maps, zone changes, CUPS, or variances. Said notice, in conjunction with newspaper ad- vertisement, must be given by direct mailing, posting or any other appropriate means. There are several issues regarding notification procedures. 1. When should residents be given notice of pending projects? There are two logical times for notification: (1) at the time the project is accepted as complete for filing, and (2) prior to the public hearing. An advantage of notifying residents at the time of filing is that it provides an opportunity for public input early in the review process. 2. What projects should be noticed? All public hearing items are currently given notice prior to the public hearing. The issue is what nrojects should be noticed at the ti.-:e of filing. Potentially any public hearing item could have an impact on the surrounding area. It would seen appropriate to notify residents concerning all public hearing items. 0 ITEM E C C Public Noticing Procedures Planning Commission Agenda • June 23, 1982 Page 2 3. How should projects be notified in addition to legal advertise- ment in the newspaper? Notice may be given by direct mailing, posting the subject property or any other means deemed appropriate. Currently, all public hear- ing items are advertised in the newspaper and notices are mailed to Property owners within 300' ten (10) days prior to the meeting. The City has the authority to use other methods of notification. Posting the subject property at the time an application is filed, in addition to the current policy, would provide notice to homeowners at two dif- ferent times during the review process. C The Commission, as an alternative, can expand the notification procedure by posting and /or mailing notices at the time of filing in conjunction with our current procedure of direct mailing and legal advertising prior to public hearings, RECOVENDATi0N: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and cons)der all material and input regarding this item, Further, it is recom- mended that the Planning Commission make a motion to continue the existing procedure as described above, or expand the notification procedures. Rerhectf�ol lyjsubmi tted, Alci: ONEZ City Planner RG:OC:jr f� Iii OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m, on at the Lion's Park Community Building, located at 9761 Baseline, to consider the following project(s): • Anyone having concerns or questions on these project(s) is encouraged to contact the fices located at 9340 Ba City Planning Division at (714)959- 1851, in writing, or by visiting the ofseline, Suite 6, on or before • Anyone wishing to comment on the orojoct(s) is encouraged to attend the oublic hearing or submit a letter to the Planning Division prior to that meeting. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE R.C. ORDINANCE NO. OFFICIAL • NOTICE OF PROJECT FILING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT An application has been filed on with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department for the following project(s): Anyone, having concerns or questions on the oroject(s) is welcome to contact the City Planning Division at (714) 9;9_1851, in writinq, or by visiting the offices located at 9340 Baseline, Suite 8, on or before lotices will be mailed to all prooerty owners of legal record within 110 feet. of the oroject site at least ten days prior to any public nearing, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE R.C. ORDINANCE NO. 0 DIRECTOR'S REPORTS E. PU9T.IC 'NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES Rick Gomez, City' Planner, reviewed the staff report for the Commission Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt a time limit should he placed on the notification signs for public input and that a statement should- be included that there was a penalty for removal of signs from the site. Edward liopson, dtsistant City Attorney, stated that by law the only thing required is that a city publish the notification of public hearizu, in the newspaper. Mr. Comoz explained to the Commission that our current notification Process for public hearing is that of advertising in the legal ad section of the newspaper and direct mailing of notices to property owners within 300 feet of 'he subject property. Jack Lam, Co,aunity Development Director, advised the Commission that • additional rotification requirements would require an adjustment to the fee rcheduL, because of the additional cost to the processing. Commissioner Stout suggested that the word welcome on the proposed signs he replaced with the word encouraged as he would like to see the public encouraged to participate in the processing of projects. !lotion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by $COItC, unanimously carried, to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance for the City Council adopting the notification procedure of posting signs at the time of project filing and public hearing, to continue the process of direct mailing notices at the time of public hearing to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, and to adjust Lite fee vchedule to compensate for the additional cost of processing. This draft Ordinance is to be hrouGht back to cite Cervnission for recommendation to the City Council. • Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 23, 1982 . ORDINANCE NO. * ) '•,�J AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.20 OF THE RANCHO CUC.AMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 2.20.090 THERETO REGARDING PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROJECTS REQUIRING PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 2.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 2.20.090 to read as follows: "Sec. 2.20.090. Public Notification Procedures. "A. Notice of filing. At such time as an application for a project, which requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission, is deemed complete for processing, the Community Development Director shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. Each notice shall • contain a general description of the project and a copy of any proposed subdivision mao or site plan. Such notices shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF FILING" "B. Notice of hearing. At least ten (10) days before the Public hearing of a project requiring public hearing before the Planning Commission the Community Development Director shall cause notice of the time and place of the public hearing on the project to be given in the following manner: "(1) By publication once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "(2) By mail or delivery to all persons, including businesses, corporations or other public or private entities, shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the project. "(3) By posting notices conspicuously on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. Each posted notice shall contain a general description of the project and a copy of any proposed subdivision map or site plan. Said posted notices shall have the following title and lettering not less than one inch in height: "WTI-GE OF HEARING" / "C. Other Notice Requirements. Notices required by this • section shall be in addition to any other or different notice required by other provisions of this code or by state law, provided, however, that nothing therein shall require separate notices to be given if the same notice will satisfy the requirements of this section and any other applicable section of this code or state law. "D. Effect of Failure to give Notice. No action, inaction or recommendation regarding any project by the Planning Commission shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by any Court by reason of any error or omission pertaining to the notices, including the failure to give any notice required by this section, unless the Court after an examination of the entire case shall be of the opinion that the error or omission complained of was prejudicial, and that by reason of such error or omission the party complaining or appealing sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probable if such error or omission had not occurred or existed. There shall be no presumption that error or omission is prejudicial or that injury was done if error or omission is shown. SECTION 2: The Mayor sha•11 sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of October, 1982. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. ?likels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk !w • • RESOLUTION NO. * .. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1, REESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES WHEREAS, the City Council desires to encourage public participation through providing additional public notification of projects; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to increase application fees to cover the cost of said noticing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that certain portions of Section 2, Planning Review Fees, of Council Resolution No. 79 -1 be amended as follows: 2.3 Conditional Use Permit ..........................$398 2.5 Planned Unit Development .......................$1272 2.7 Variance ............. ...........................$272 • 2.8 Zone Change .......... ...................$649 +32 /acre 2.9 General Plan Amendment .........................$1272 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that certain portions of Section 3, Subdivision and Parcel Map Fees, of Council Resolution No. 79 -1 be amended as follows: 3.1.1 Tentative Tract Filing Fee ............ $649 +32 /acre 3.1.2 Tentative Parcel Map ..........................$207 PASSES, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • Jon 0. i e s, ayor l J 0 9 Date: To: From: By: Subject: CITY OP RANCHO CCG' vIONGA STAFF REPORT 'H C., CtICA 14O . r n O� O y � P f 2 September 30. 1982 U 1977 1 City Council and City Manager Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Mary Whitney, Administrative Secretary Proposed Changes in ordinance No. 70 At the September 14 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, the Commission discussed the attached proposed changes in Ordinance 70. It was explained to the Commission that Historic Landmark /Point of Interest designation by way of resolution rather than ordinance would be more timely and 'carry the same weight' as an ordinance. (see attached 8/27/82 memo.) The Commission unanimously elected to recommend to Council the attached changes in Ordinance 70. MW 13 C-I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM August 27, 1982 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Mary Whitney, Administrative Secretary Community Services Department Subject: Proposed changes in Ordinance 70 The attached Ordinance is for your review. These are the modifications necessary to Ordinance 70 should the Commission elect to designate Landmarks and Points of Interest by Resolution rather than Ordinance. As was explained during the July meeting, any properties designated as Landmarks or Points of Interest by Resolution would be subject to the policies, rules and regulations adopted in Ordinance 70. The properties would remain protected under Ordinance 70, just as they have been in the past. A Resolution designating a property as a Historic Landmark would be a formal decree enabling implementation of the policies act forth and adopted in Ordinance 70. Directing policy by way of Resolution rather than Ordinance is a common practice within our City and most others. Resolutions are effective immediately, require no second reading and thereby offer substantial cost and time savings. Attached for your information is a sample resolution regarding Historic Landmark designation. NOTE: you may notice the wording in the titles of the sample resolution and ordinance refers to Chapter 2.24 rather than Ordinance 70. This is because all City ordinances have been codified to become the City Municipal Code and must be referred to as such. MW • E ONU IN.INCE NO. 70 -E AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCY.O :'UCAHONGA, CAL IMR, In, AMENDING SUB- SECTIONS O, E AND F OF SECTION 3.24.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAHONCA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS P.WEOHiE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: s ELTION 1: Sub- Sectiotu D. E AM F of Section 2.34.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as folloes: D. The City Council may approve, modify and •Apr owe, nr deny the a.,ded designation. Approval, or modification and approve 1, of the designation shall be upon adoptloa of a Resolution. E. The property included in any much designatlon .hall be ..bled 10 the regulations set forth In this Ordinance and any further eonero la specified in the de.igneti:g A..olu tion. P. The Secretary shall cause a copy of the designating Resolution to be forwarded to any department or agency requesting it or to any individual department or agency to Mw the Secretary considers It appropriate • to have it sent. S SOTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the s m s AM the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its Passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, Published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cvcamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED and) MOPTED this _ day of 1903, by the tollrnf A, vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTE T: • • • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: September 24, 1982 To: City Council and City Manager From: Hill Holley, Director, Community Services Department I A4 cmCAC(B .�0 a F' V iZ J> Subject: Heritage Park: Design Consultant - A Recommendation In a previous memorandum to Council, we indicated the response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) had been well responded to, and the review committee, comprised of Dave Leonard (Public Works), Michael Vairin (Planning), Pam Henry (Community) and this writer, would review, screen and interview a select number of firms, for the purpose of giving a recommendation to Council on award of design contract. This has been accomplished. This item will be on the Council agenda at the October 6th meeting. Fight proposals were received with the following "technical detail ": Boyle Architectural Associates ... ........................$91,000 Closson and Closson .............. ........................$98,540 John J. Greenwood and Associates . ........................$54,000 Kobata Associates, Inc ........... ........................$77,000 Peridian Group., ...................... I.......... Non - responsive Recreation Systems, Inc .......... ........................$72,480 Reynolds Environmental Group ..... ........................$78,800 The WLB Group /Garcia and Associates .............. Non - responsive In selecting a design firm, price alone cannot be the deciding factor. The firms' resources, reputation, past performance, and both the quantity and quality of their experience are really the chief determinants, along with how well you perceive that their philosophy of approach will mesh with yours. The committee members studied the written submittals for approximately one week. A meeting was then held and each committee member wrote down their selection of the top 'four' firms of the eight. In each case, all members' ballots reflected the same 'three' candidates in the first three positions, while perhaps in a different ranking order. It was then agreed upon to invite those three firms to an interview. They were, in alphabetical order: continued ... 7 I JOHN J. GREENWOOD and ASSOCIATES, San Juan Capistrano • RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC., Fullerton REYNOLDS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, Newport Beach Each firm was given one week to prepare any supplemental information to their written proposals and present their firms' ideas to the committee. At the conclusion of the interview process the committee voted unanimously to recommend to Council the selection of RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC., as design consultant for Heritage Park. They have a list of professional credentials and clients that is extremely impressive. They would be represented throughout the process by the two principals of the firm, Ron Paige, President, and Randy Meyer, Vice President. The firm deals only in park design. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to execute contract awarding design contract, for site plans through final approved working drawings of Heritage Park, to RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC., in the amount of $72,480. Attached hereto, find a sample contract (which has been reviewed through the City Attorney's office) and copies of RSI's proposal. I • think you will find it interesting and straight forward in its approach. If you have any questions or comments, or wish to review the full range of proposals prior to the October 6th meeting, please give me a call at your convenience. Thank you. WLH /mw ) q0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP. • CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called CITY, and RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC., hereinafter called CONSULTANT. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City intends to design the Facility described as Heritage, Park, southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California; AND, WHEREAS, the Consultant has signified his willingness to undertake the Architectural and Engineering work in connection therewith; NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows: FIRST: The Parties hereto agree to the following definitions: A. The "Project" shall mean the Facility described herein. H. The "Council" shall mean the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga. The Council is the governing body of the City. C. The "Director" shall mean the Director of Community Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, authorized by the Council to represent the City in matters pertaining to the Project. D. The "Approved Final Estimate." shall mean the estimate of construction cost approved by the Council at the time the working drawings, details and specifications are adopted or approved. SECOND: The Consultant agrees to perform, for City, work, professional services, in accordance with the public laws, ordinances, and regulations applicable to the work to be performed, and as hereinafter set forth. THIRD: The City agrees to pay the Consultant for such services, a fee of $72,080.00. FOURTH: The parties hereto further agree to the following conditions: ARTICLE I - COST OF THE PROJECT • The anticipated Budget for construction phase of the Project is $1, 36 0,000.00+ / -. The Approved F'innl Estimate for construction is based nn the. Consultant's final working drawings and specifications, when approved by the Council. ARTICLE II - CONSULTANT'S SERVICES A. The Consultant shall perform required professional services in • accordance with all public laws, ordinances, and regulations, as applicable. The services to be rendered by the Consultant shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Attend all necessary community meetings for input into site plan concept. 2. Provide a site plan concept of the project, that will show pictorial views of the major design features. A construction cost estimate of this concept will also be provided by the Consultant at this time. 3. Furnish preliminary plans to include layout drawings of the proposed construction, a complete site plan showing all of the major or important components of the work to be constructed, and an estimate of construction costs. 3. Attend all necessary consultations and conferences with the Director, and the Council. 5. Provide necessary services required to make corrections of preliminary sketches and drawings required by the City. 6. Provide original tracings of working drawings, details, specifications, computations, including structural and • engineered site plan, subject to approval by the City. Preliminary Plans, described in Section 3, above, must be approved by City before Consultant may proceed with final working drawings and specifications. 7. Assist City in preparation of Construction Bid Package, or Packages in the case of phased construction, and Construction Contract, or Contracts in the case of phased construction, consistent with all applicable Federal, State, County and local regulations. n. Extra Consultant Services - Services not within the scope of this Agreement shall not be rendered by the Consultant unless such extra services shall first be authorized in writing by the City. The additional fee to the Consultant for extra services shall be determined by negotiation between the City and the Consultant. ARTICLE. III - PAYMENTS Payments to the Consultant on account of the fee shall be computed on the basis of the Consultant's fee of $72,480.00. A. Upon completion and acceptance of the Design concept, and preliminary drawings and specifications, a sum shall be paid to the Consultant on account of the fee, equal to 25% of the fee, • or $18,120.00, 8. Upon completion and acceptance of 50% of the working drawings and details, a sum sufficient to increase the total amount paid Ij�n to the Consultant on account of the fee to 50% of the fee, or $36,240.00. • C. Upon completion of corrections of working drawings, details and specifications as may be required by public agencies pursuant to required approval and upon approval or adoption of the working drawings, details and specifications by the Council, together with a final estimate of construction cost, a sum sufficient to increase the total amount paid to the Consultant on account of the fee to 100E of the fee, or $72,460.00 D. Payments for extra services authorized by the Council shall be made upon completion of said services, in the manner in which all other City claims are paid. E. All demands for payments under this Agreement shall be submitted in triplicate to the City. ARTICLE IV - REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY The Director shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. The Consultant shall designate, in a letter addressed to the City, an agent whu in the Consultant's absence may sign, in the name of the Consultant, papers and other documents relating to the Consultant's services to be performed hereunder. • ARTICLE V - SURVEYS It shall be the responsibility of the consultant to provide any information as to sewer, water, steam, gas, electrical and other utility services which are not indicated on the survey. ARTICLE VI - CHECKING AND PERMIT FEES The Consultant shall not be required to pay any plan checking fees or permit fees. The Consultant shall have a current Rancho Cucamonga business license. ARTICLE VII - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The Council reserves and has the right and privilege of cancelling, sucpending or abandoning the execution of any work in connection with this Agreement at any time opon written notice to the Consultant. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the City should the City substantially fail to perform in accordance with this Agreement. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished Design Development and Construction Documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the City's property. In the event of termination, City shall pay the Consultant as full payment for all services performed and all expenses incurred under this Agreement the sum due under Article IV, as shall have become payable under that article because of the progress in the work, plus a pro -rata portion of the next and incompleted step, if any, as the 1 '1 J services actually rendered hereunder by the Consultant bear to the total services necessary for the full performance of the next succeeding step, plus any sums due the Consultant for extra services described under Article III herein. In ascertaining the services actually rendered hereunder up to the date of termination of this • Agreement consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents whether delivered to City or in the possession of Consultant and to authorized reimbursable expenses. If, upon payment of the amount required to be paid under this Article followin7 the termination of this Agreement, City, thereafter, should detarmine to complete the original Project or substantially the same Project, City for such purposes shall have the right to utilization of any original tracings, drawings, calculat-l.ons, specifications, estimates and other Construction Documents prepared under this Agreement by Consultant who shall make them available to City upon request without additional compensation. ARTICLE. VIII - DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, OWNERSHIP AND REPRODUCTION A. The Consultant shall deliver to the City full completed preliminary drawings, working drawings, details and specifications which shall become the property of the City. B. All working drawings shall be drawn in ink on a high grade 100h or linen paper, or City approved equivalent. r. The specifications shall be typewritten, and furnished in such form, that they may be duplicated on standard office copiers. • D. Prior to final delivery of the drawings to the City, the Consultant shall furnish required copies of drawings that may be required for plan check, building permit, etc. E. The Consultant shall be entitled to copies of the prints of the drawings and the specifications for his files. F. The City will furnish copies of all drawings and specifications required for bidders, contractors and for construction. ARTICLE IK - KEEPING ACCOUNTS The Consultant shall keep separate books of accounts in connection with his work to be performed under this Agreement. These books shall be subject to audit by the City. ARTICLE; R - TIME OF COMPLETION The conceptual design, the preliminary drawings, the specifications, the working drawings, details, and the final approved estimate shall he completed within 120 calendar days from the date Consultant receives an executed copy of this Agreement. The time during which the Consultant is delayed in his work by the • acts or neglect of the Council, or its employees, or those under it by contract or otherwise, or by the Act of God which the Consultant could not have foreseen and provided for and which is not due to any fault or negligence on the part of the Consultant shall be added to the time of complut.,n of the dock and Clie Consultant shall not be liable for any damages on account of such delay. ARTICLE %I - INDEMNIFICATION, LIABILITY INSURANCE, AND WORKERS COMPENSATION • A. Indemnification The Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers and employees and agents against liability (bodily injury, including death and property damage) arising out of negligent acts of the Consultant or his employees in the performance of this Agreement. B. Liability Insurance The Consultant shall maintain combined single limit general liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $300,000 or the equivalent thereof. Said insurance must contain an endorsement that the City named as additional insured. Certificates of insurance evidencing this coverage must be delivered to the City prior to commencement of the professional services described herein. C. Worker's Compensation The Consultant shall furnish evidence of compliance with Worker's Compensation laws or Certificate of Self- Insurance for employees, satisfactory to the City. l J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECREATION SYSTEMS INC. on D. Mikels, Mayor Ronald F. Paige, President Date Date ATTESTED: 2500 E. Nutwood Avenue, Suite 210 Fullerton, California 92631 (714) 879 -6373 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Approved as to legal form: Robert F. Dougherty, City Attorney • pi ti • 1-^E"r j 1] STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 1W7 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Park Renovation Purpose: In recent weeks with the beginning of soccer season, several concerns have been raised about the condition of the playing fields at Alta Loma Park. Based on this input, the Staff has prepared this report to explore options for improving the park to meet the expressed concerns. Background: The Alta Loma Park was constructed prior to incorporation with funds provided by the Economic Development Administration (EDA) as a part of President Carter's Public Works Employment Act. These funds came with extremely tight time constraints and forced many agencies to hastily develop plans for facilities to take advantage of the funds. Because the park was hastily conceived and designed, certain mainte- nance problems were developed into the park which have manifested themselves in recent years. These problems fall into two broad categories: • Grading and Drainage • Turf Grading The park was designed with an engineered look that incorporates flat pads sharp (2:1) slope bank and rock filled drainage swales. The slope bank and rock swale is not amenable to mowing and requires significant manpower commitments to keep weeded and dressed. The park should be regraded to remove steep slopes,to fill rock drainage swales and to collect drainage in more gentle turf swales on the southern perimeter of the park. These actions will remove the rock nuisance, eliminate much of the hand maintenance demand and make the park more usable. Turf The park turf is a fescue mixture, a tough, commonly used park turf / /fh CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Park Renovation October 6, 1982 Page 2 but has the characteristic of being very clumpy and as a result, cannot be mowed very low and kept in the kind of fine consistent surface for sports activities such as soccer. Furthermore, when areas are eroded from use, greater time is necessary for recovery of the turf between uses. The existence of very little top soil beneath the turf further exacerbates the problem. When the native soil, which is rocky by nature, is exposed, any activity brings rocks to the surface which in turn are scattered about the field. The fields were reseeded about two years ago. While it did not create the ideal solution, the surface was improved considerably for the following year. Unfortunately, the fields suffered a major set- back this summer due to a new water main installation which increased pressure at the park and caused frequent failure of the systems back - flow prevention valve. This occurred during one of the hottest periods of the summer and portions of the field where heavy use takes place went into permanent wilt due to lack of water. Although this problem has been corrected, there was insufficient time between this occurrence and the beginning of this soccer season for the field to recover. The more desirable turf for a finer playing field is the Hybrid Bermuda. This turf can be mowed at a lower height and has a quicker recovery period. • Alternatives While the present condition of the fields can be enhanced through reseeding, the fine consistent surface required by certain sports activities cannot be achieved without some modification of the field characteristics. The renovation alternatives range from complete field reconstruction to minimal renovation. These options range in cost from $8,000 to $55,000. Five options have been identified and are detailed in the attached charts and summarized below: OPTION 1: Fescue Mixture Overseed - This is the minimal treatment which would be similar to This actions and would im- prove the surface for a year but would require frequent recurrence. This treatment would not likely result in an improved playing surface. No Grading changes. Estimated cost: $8,611. OPTION 2: 0 on Bermuda Overseed - This process would begin to change the park tur ut would take many years to fully transition. The results would eventually be a more acceptable playing surface. • No Grading changes. Estimated cost: $8,061. ��7 • CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Park Renovation October 6, 1982 Page 3 •40 OPTION 3: Common Bermuda By Seed - Regrading - This option would accelerate the conversion to a superior playing surface but would require six months closure of the park and additional expense. Regrading is proposed concurrently. Cost Estimate: $40,943. OPTION 4: Hybrid Bermuda By Stolons - Regrading - This option would make use of hybrid stolons (seed stalks) in place of seeds. The stolons will establish more quickly with a stronger mat. Regrading is proposed. Cost Estimate: $46,095. OPTION 5: Hybrid Bermuda By Sod - Regrading - This option would replace turf through Boding. It would be the quickest establishment with the minimal down time (two months) for the park. Regrading is proposed. Cost Estimate: $54,390. • Implementation The proposed project should be redesigned by a park consultant and reconstruction contracted in early January. The park field would be closed for use from January to August to allow for turf establishment. Future Park. Maintenance and Operation The proposed project would result in a superior park athletic field, however, would still require additional maintenance commitments to insure the continued health of the field. The Hybrid Bermuda grass requires closer mowing than the fescue mix and the City will be required to purchase a reel type gang mower to properly groom the field. This mower would cost from $12,000 to $30,000 but would have the side benefit of increasing maintenance productivity. It is recommended that the mower acquisition be studied further and included in next year's budget considerations. Any playing field that receives intensive use must be given periodic relief from activity to allow time for recovery. This relief has not been provided in the past and must be more carefully considered in the future. This factor will result in periodic field closure and rotation schedule. These recovery periods can likely be scheduled around the major activities such as soccer and "T" ball but will 40 pull the field out of use in the off peak periods. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Park Renovation October 6, 1982 aft Page 4 • Future Park Needs Two additional facts should be pointed out to the Council. First, I unds expended on extensive renovation could be used to develop additional parks to provide relief and, second, Staff will likely be lookina at addtional park improvements in the coming year such as tree planting, play equipment installation and curbing of sand pit areas. These additional items fall outside the immediate con- cerns, but do relate to overall long term park improvement and development. RECOJLNIENDATION It is recommended that the Council: 1. Approve Alta Loma Park renovation Option 4 at a budget of $50,000 to be drawn from the park development :unds. 2. Direct Staff to study lawn mower acquisition options for presenta- tion with the 1983 -84 Fiscal Budget. 3. That the plan be implemented during a park closure between January • and August of 1983. 4. Direct Staff to prepare a park operations plan to insure optimum life of the improved park facility. Respectfully submit l Attachments �' y • ALTA LOMA PARK RENOVATION 0 ,0 COST SUMMARY OF OPTIONS Placement $38,890.00 • Hybrid Hybrid Common Common Fescue Bermuda Bermuda Bermuda Bermuda Mixture By Sod By Stolons By Seed Over Seed Over Seed • Turf and Placement $38,890.00 $11,142.00 $ 5,990.00 S 5,990.00 S 6,540.00 Regrade slopes and drainage swales $ 9,500.0c $ 9,500.00 $ 9,500.00 relocate irrigation and replant Remove existing turf S 3,000.0 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Import top soil and placement S 9,870.00 S 9,870.00 Top dressing and placement $ 5,105.00 $ 5,105.00 $ 2,071.00 $ 2,071.00 (60 C.Y.) (60 C.V.) Fence rental (up to one year) $2,478.00 $ 2,478.00 Design engineer and set grades $ 5,000.0 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 TOTAL S54, 390.0 $46,095.00 1 $40,943.00 S 8,061.001 $ 8,611.00 IA A •r ALTA. LOMA PARK RENOVATION OPTIONS ANALYSIS- DETAIL COST ESTIMATES TURF OPTIONS fill in rock flow lines and I. Hybrid Bermuda by Sod 152,460 s.f. 8 $.185 = $28,200.00 Placement $ 2,500.00 Existing irrigation relocation 152,460 s.f. a $.057 = $ 8,690.00 unknown as this time) $ 2,000.00 S3 %) 00 2. Hybrid Bermuda by Stolons 100,000 5.f, � $.05 765 bushels ?z S4,60 $ 3,519.00 Place�ent 2. Remove existing turf S 3,000.00 152,460 s.f. p $.05 = $ 7,623 00 3. Common Bermuda by Seed 230 lbs. _il S2.15 = $ 500,00 Placement 152,460. s.f. ? $.036 S 5,490.00 s 5,990,00 4. Fescue by Seed 1500 lbs. ? $7.50 = S 1,050,00 Placement 152,460, S.f. � $.036 = S 5.1,90.00 6, 540.0 p B, SUPPOPT STORK (GRADING, SOIL PRE, TOP SOIL, ETC.) 1. ReVradin9 drainage ditches: fill in rock flow lines and cut back 2:1 slopes to provide more gentle slopes and drainage smells $ 2,500.00 Existing irrigation relocation as needed (extent of work needed unknown as this time) $ 2,000.00 Replant disturbed areas 100,000 5.f, � $.05 5 5,000.00 S 9,500.00 2. Remove existing turf S 3,000.00 )-,/ 0 \J L n U • • 3. Import top soil 1410 cy p $7.00 $ 9,870.00 Placement $ 1,000.00 $IC 0 00 4, Top Dressing 230 cy � $17-85 $ 4,105.00 Placement $ 1,000.00 $ 5,105.00 5• Fence Rental 2400 1.f. (a $.97 $ 2,328.00 2 gates Q $.75 150.00 $ 2570 6. Design engineering surveys (not based on proposals) S 5,000.00 • • 0 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Inspector . � �acsloyc Za I F � ! SUBJECT: Award of North Town III Street Improvement Contract 1977 The Community Development Department has received written approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to award the North Town Phase III Street Improvement Contract to American Con- struction of Buena Park, California. American's proposal is: $78,986.05 (Seventy -eight thousand, Nine Hundred Eighty -six dollars and five cents). The lowest and only other bidder is Frontier Concrete Construction of Arcadia, California. Frontier's bid proposal is: $76,880.03 (Seventy -six thousand, Eight hundred eighty dollars and three cents). Although Frontier Construction submitted a lower bid proposal than that of American Construction, we do not feel that Frontier is ade- quately licensed under the laws of this state to perform the scope of work required by the plans and specifications of the North Town Phase III Project. Frontier Concrete Construction is licensed in the State of California as a concrete speciality (C -8) contractor. We have received a written determination from the State Contractor's License Board in Sacramento that a general engineering contractor's license is re- quired to perform a contract of this scope. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga officially award the North Town Phase III Contract to American Construction and authorize the Mayor to execute said contract on behalf of the City. The contract amount to be $78,986 -.05 plus a 103 contigency for a total not to exceed $86,884.65. Respectfully su mitted, LBH :(fl : j as \ Atta hments I� 1 I 11 A a' to o 'z o • i o i I ��a o v i~ice m of I 2� �I m -I 2 s m c I I� 1 I 11 • r o 8 8 • o • • n ,-A �, Gl�A. \ICl3 October 4, 1962 • • Vt .Jb CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11 - -J nn 11. Mikcl. ('hark" J. Buquo 11 Jame" C, Fmst Richard \t. D.hl Phillip 11. ScMOSner Mr. Zep Cardona HUD - Los Anqeles Area Office 2500 Wilshire Blvd. Los Anaeles, California 90057 RE: Award of North Town Phase III Contract Dear Zep, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received written notification from the State Contractor's License Board that Frontier Concrete Construc- tion is not licensed to perform the scope of work required by the North Town Phase III contract. Although Frontier is legally licensed as a concrete speciality contrac- tor, the North Town contract requires work that extends beyond what the Contractor's License Board considers incidental to the concrete Contract items which Frontier is licensed to construct. Therefore, we wish to request HUD approval to award the contract to the second bidder (American Construction of Buena Park, California), or to reject both bids and readvertise, at the discretion of the City Council. Respectfully, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION i� DAVE BLEVINS Public Works Inspector DB: jas Lr0 ' �. ReyationTtq -- C C T 5198? 9320 BASELINE ROAD. SVITF, C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 s RAN(' 110 ('I'('A \IONM?W,{TAF'O2tOWryI� #Q �giJ1959 -0Pit � • • \ ii 44kt(\r _ v�v October 4, 1962 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m—, J.nl 11. Aikd, Inu nr ilm rmMrr Charles J. BuVUM 11 Jame, ('. Fr,.M Richard M. Dahl 11hdiq, 11. tichlasxer HUD - Los Angles Office 2500 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90057 Attn: Zap Cardona RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Office of Community Development, Engineering Division, hereby requests HUD approval and clearance to • award a construction contract to implement the approved CDDG Project/ Activity identified below: Project /Activity Name: NORTH TOWN PHASE III Activity Location: MARINE AVENUE /CENTER AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA. PRIME CONTRACTOR (SECOND BIDDER)" REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL Name: American Construction Phone No. 714/524 -0970 Address: P. O. Box 485, Buena Park, CA 90621 Amount of Bic'.: $78,986.05 Cont. State Lie. :299456 -A SUBCONTRACTOR(S) REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL - None `Low Bidder - Frontier Concrete Construction disqualified. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. COMMUNITY DF-VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEEP.ING DIVISION k(.uc'%X 1 V", DAVE BLEVINS Public Works Inspector DB: jaa cc; Rick Marks, Associate Planner 932011ASELINE ROAD, 811Tt)(' • 14)ST OFFICE IIOE sn7 C Ana o c r 5 1992 ItA Nf 1111 (' 1'( AMONf;\ f) 191P9 • 17141999.19 i1 r; C L„ — _._ pi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .w.w.Jon D. >Iikels rb.vinrnprrr Charles J. B.'.0 II J.mes C. F,.m Richard )I. Dahl Philhp U. Schlosser September 9, 1982 Frontier Concrete Construction 4251 E. Live Oak Avenue Arcadia, California 91006 RE: North Town Phase III Gentlemen: At 10:00 am on September 7, 1982 sealed bids for the North Town Phase III Street Improvements were opened in the Office of the City Clerk. The apparent low bidder is Frontier Concrete Construction. Verification of a valid contractors license indicates that Frontier Concrete Construction is • licensed as a C -8 (concrete specialty) contractor. Upon reviewing the appli= cable sections of the Business and Professions Code (Contractors License Law) Division 3, Chapter 9, Article 4, Sections 7055, 7056, 7057, 7058 and 7059, and confering with the Contractors State License Board, there is some question as to the scope of the contract being beyond that of a specialized classifica- tion of a C -8 contractor. Specifically, although the concrete work is approxi- mately 54`.; of the project, it is questionable as to the A.C. and related work being incidental. As you are aware, the subject project is a federally funded project and subject to applicable codes, including Government Code Section 14311.5 as follows: "In all State projects where Federal funds are involved, no bid submittal or contract thereafter awarded shall be invalidated by the failure of the bidder or contractor to be properly licensed in accordance with the laws of this state, no shall any such contractor be denied payment under any such contract because of such failure; provided however, that the first payment for work or material under such contract shall not be made by the State Controller unless and until the Registrar of Contractors certifies to him that the records of the Contractors State License Board coo ,cc indicates that such contractor was or became properly licensed between the time of bid opening and the making of the certification, Any bidder or contractor not so licensed shall be subject to all legal penalties imposed by such laws, including but not limited to gas; any appropriate disciplinary action by the Contractors State License sJnoa9! • Board. The department shall include a <tatement to that effect in W 55. the standard form of pre - qualification questionnaire and financial statement." YIN. S ,SW,Wi 9320 IL1SF.LISF. ROAD. SCITf:C • POST OF FI('F: ROY 907 •RIYCIIf1 ('1'('A Mny . : \, CALIFORNIA 80 (1111989.1 851 o4 MfJ' '8 ^• rrontier concrete Cons t- Iction 'September 9, 1982 ! ' Page 2 • At this time, Staff will be requesting from The Department of Housing and Urban Development authorization to award the contract to Frontier. The point is that H.U.O. could withhold payment to the City should they deter- mine the contractor is not properly licensed and, therefore, the city would withhold payr.ent to the contractor. If you are of the opinion that Frontier Concrete Construction is properly licensed or will be able to obtain the proper license, we would appreciate your written response to that effect so that we may proceed with the award process. However, be advised that should you decide to proceed, this agency will make no payments on the contract until H.U.D. determines if the contractor is properly licensed according to all applicable sections of the Business and Professions Code and the above quoted Government Code section. Should you decide to withdraw your bid proposal based upon this information, we would appreciate your written response to that effect. Please be advised that the City makes no recommendations as to what action Frontier should take or to the validity of Frontier's license with respect to this project and has only brought this question to Frontier's attention for their information. • If you have any questions, please contact me at this office. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION �� 4 �d DAVE BLEVINS Public works Inspector DB:jaa � r I � I� C\r�n 11) n1, Mran1 \� PI IILII'NnNh51]5P6CtUR 11 VM[,W I,INO�U ,11.�Ot Wt IHNH1Hl1 WMOIG XA911M n�,trp l' ) V _ Ew E, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .ws.,. Jon U. 31iMels 1 -•v,InmMr, Charles J. I1u9uet 11 James C. Ernst Richard N. bhl Phillip 1). Schlosser Seoter..ber 13, 1982 HUD Los Angeles Area Office 2500 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90057 Attn: Zep Cardona SUBJECT: Acceptance of Contractor by H.U.D. and Permission to Award Contract for North Town Phase III Street Improvements - Program Grant 08 -82 -Mc -0556 Mr. Cardona: • On September 7, 1982, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened sealed bids for the above mentioned project. The low bidder was Frontier Concrete Construction at $76,880.00. The second and only other bidder was American Construction of Buena Park at $78,986.05. The City has verified that Frontier Concrete Construction is licensed C -8 (Concrete Specialty) contractor, License number: 340252. American Construction is licensed as a General Engineering Contractor, License number: 299456. Since H.U.D. is the funding agency, we are requesting an official determination as to the eligibility of Frontier Concrete Construction regarding their ability to perform the contract within the scope of their contractors . license classification. We have attached an official "Request for Approval of Contractor" as well as a copy of the letter we sent to Frontier Concrete Construction. If you have any questions please contact me at this office. Resoectfully, CO ?11 ;U1ITY OEVELOPISENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION �C6GC .�FlfiGw� • Dave Glevins Public storks Inspector Enc. OB:bc 9320 BASELINE ROAD. SUITE C • POST OFFICE ROX 907 • RANCHO CI'CAMO\C.A, CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 9MIB51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �[ — i \_ .v.•.. Jon U. \likely CL Z Chvlrs J. HuVUeI 11 Jame' C. F.m R kwd M. Dahl Phillip 1). Schi.wr 19'; September 10, 1982 HUD - Los Angeles Area Office 2500 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90057 Attn: :ep Cardona SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Office of Community Development, Engineering Division hereby requests HUD approval and clearance to award a construction contract to implement the approved CDBG Project /Activity identified below: • Project /Activity Name: NORTH TOWN PHASE III Activity Location: MARINE AVENUE /CENTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, PRIME CONTRACTOR (LOW BIDDER) REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL Name: FRONTIER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION Phone No. 213/574 -7925 Address: 4251 E. Live Oak Ave., Arcadia, CA 91006 Amount of Bid: $76,880.03 Cont. State Lic. #340252 C -8 SUBCONTRACTOR(S) REOUESTED FOR APPROVAL - None Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. CO ?1 ?tUNITV DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT coo lccc ENGINEERING DIVISION ,p Fay. aassa „' Dave BlovinS Public Works Inspector o�a7o91. cc: Rick, 14arYS , Associate Planner :0, „ M9'J'+ M SSilpDi'• 97C. 9JN HASELINE ROAD, SL'ITEC • POST OFFICE RON 807 • RA Nf1IOC l'CA)IOSC.A.CALIFORSIA91',90 (714)999.1931 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f/ ,7 Ct i Ch.'I" J. IWyuct II J:mm. 1'. Y"..1 10,hard N. Dahl I'hdup U 1,hk —, Septe : :IDer 10, 1982 HUM - Los Angeles Area Office 2503 Nilshire Blvd. LACOR RELATIONS Los Angeles, California 90057 Attn: 7ep Cardona SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Office of Community Development, Engineering Division hereby requests HUD approval and clearance to award a construction contract to implement the approved CDBG Project /Activity identified below: • Project /Activity Name: NORTH TOS1N PHASE III Activity Location: MARINE AVENUE /CENTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMOAGA, CA. PRIME COIITRACTOR (LOW BIDDER) REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL (/ Name: FRONTIER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION Phone No. 213/574 -7926 Address: :251 E. Live Oak Ave., Arcadia, CA 91006 Amount of Bid: $76,0 010.03 Cont. State Lic.' - 310252 C -8 SUBCO'ITRACTOR($) REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL - None Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. COY,'4UNITY DE7ELOPMENT 0EP,'P' "EI1T ECGINEER1 ::G DIVISION Dave BlevinS Public 'Work; Inspector cc: kirk, Marks, Associate Planner on -HUD 9320 BASELINE WAII, SCITE C • POST OMIT INIX S07 Ra,%(I If) 1'1'C. \)111. \1L\. 1'A I.I FDItNIA') 17.10 • 17111,989.1X51 Mr. Bob Berrigan Contractor's State License Board P.O. Box 26000 Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Mr. Berrigan: I am writing you at the suggestion of Deputy Registrar Mr. Ed Campos of your E1 Monte office. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division is in • need of an official determination by the Contractor's State License Board as to the legal ability and qualifications of a specific contractor to perform a capital improvement contract for the City. The facts are as follows: The project is part of a Community Development Block Grant Program funded entirely by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The project design, specifications, and administration is by City Staff. The work to be performed under contract is off -site street improvements consisting of: 1. 13,710 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Removal 2. 2,335 L.F. P.C.C. Curb and Gutter 3. 10,816 S.F. P.C.C. Sidewalk 4. 200 Tons Asphalt Concrete Paving 5. 3,332 S.F. P.C.C. Drive Approach 6. 3 Ea. Raise Water Valves 7. 260 S.F. P.C.C. Driveway Transitions 8. 1,950 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Drive Transitions 9. 40 L.F. P.C.C. Rolled Curb do Gutter 10. 7 Ea. Remove exist. 36" do less trees L L1 9350 BASELINE ROAn, SUITE C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 a (711) 989.1891 •. �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .w.... Jon D. )likely • `�, _ 4v� Z Charles J. Duyurt 11 James C. Frost Richard M. Dahl Philhp D. Schlosser 11i77 September 23,1982 Mr. Bob Berrigan Contractor's State License Board P.O. Box 26000 Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Mr. Berrigan: I am writing you at the suggestion of Deputy Registrar Mr. Ed Campos of your E1 Monte office. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division is in • need of an official determination by the Contractor's State License Board as to the legal ability and qualifications of a specific contractor to perform a capital improvement contract for the City. The facts are as follows: The project is part of a Community Development Block Grant Program funded entirely by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The project design, specifications, and administration is by City Staff. The work to be performed under contract is off -site street improvements consisting of: 1. 13,710 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Removal 2. 2,335 L.F. P.C.C. Curb and Gutter 3. 10,816 S.F. P.C.C. Sidewalk 4. 200 Tons Asphalt Concrete Paving 5. 3,332 S.F. P.C.C. Drive Approach 6. 3 Ea. Raise Water Valves 7. 260 S.F. P.C.C. Driveway Transitions 8. 1,950 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Drive Transitions 9. 40 L.F. P.C.C. Rolled Curb do Gutter 10. 7 Ea. Remove exist. 36" do less trees L L1 9350 BASELINE ROAn, SUITE C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 a (711) 989.1891 % Letter to B. Berrigan i September 23, 1982 Page 2 / The low bidder is Frontier Concrete Construction, 4251 E. Live Oak Ave., Arcadia, CA. 91006, Contractor's License Number - 340252 -C8, at $76,880.03. Approximately 54% of Frontier's proposal is concrete work. The second and only other bidder is American Construction, P.O. Box 485, Buena Park, CA 90621, Contractor's License Number 299456 -A at $78,986.05. Approximately 66% of American's bid proposal is concrete work. Work is to be performed according to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's standard plans and the State of California Standard Specifications, January, 1981 Edition. As mentioned above, this office is requesting a written determination as to whether Frontier Concrete Construction is adequately licensed to perform 100% of the contract or qualified to sub - contract portions of the work. • We would greatly appreciate your urgent written response so that we may know how to proceed. Respectfully, COMtIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Dave Blevins Public {Yorks Inspector DB:be • • 9 III n1 D Alin Un lei In 1Anlll A STAFF REPORT s � `c� t F DATE: October 6, 1982 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Local Gas Tax Option Attached for Council review is a packet of information from the County Transportation Department on the local gas tax option pro- vided for by SB215. The County would like an expression of interest in further pur- suing this option Countywide. As you are aware, the local gas tax option is one source of funds being considered for develop- ment of the Foothill Freeway corridor. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council instruct staff to transmit a res- ponse to the County indicating Rancho Cucamonga's interest in fur- ther study of the local gas tax option. Respectfully submitted, LBH:jaa Attachments i. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '{ ``ONMENTAL AND FLOOD CONTROL �v..:, _ Fu, IR WORKS AGENCY RIS Ent Third Street •San Bernardino, CA 92415 • (714) 363-1665 ':'\y' j J..... R. SHONE Drpwv / e . M, P.Wk . v B. L. INGRAM Dtr t., September 15, 1982 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer .. ...... ., .. ._.. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: The recently enacted gas tax bill (SB 215) provides for local option gas tax in It increments. The following requirements must be met to imple- ment the incremental tax: I. Agreement on an allocation formula • 2. vote of the electorate 3. Approval of the Board of Supervisors 4. Approval by majority of the cities with the majority population Recently, there was a Board of Supervisors' committee appointed to study road needs in the San Bernardino mountain areas. One of the findings of this committee was that additional road funds were needed and the Local Option Funds for Transportaton (LOFT) was recommended as one alternative. I have enclosed some information as to what other counties in the state are doing. At this time, I am surveying the cities to see if there is any interest by the cities in pursuing this alternative for additional road funds. I would appreciate having your thoughts by October 18 . The responses and comments will be shared with all of the cities, and if there is an interest in further research, we can arrange appropriate further meetings. Yours very truly, .90/' ycr 4-v- / B.L. INGR Director Transportation /Flood Control BLlona • Encl. �'zr` Cb► wily . ulpe,t•v-iaors 1.41;.%;o ►(•��a 1eo►j 4rpft'Q ►laf►r ►aa ►a July 19, 1982 end Flo" Control TO: CEAC Transportation Committee Members and Meeting Attendees FROM: Victor S. Pottorff, Legislative Representative Don Headf Director of Public Works, Sonoma County SUBJECT: COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES I'LL r:i:Af: 'transportation Committee met on .tiny i4 in Sacramento (tttrichment I). I'hc meeting was attended by county supervisors and Public Works representatives from the following 23 counties: ,Alameda Spike Flertzheim Supervisor Joseph Sort Amador Gary Caldwell • Calaveras Bob Leitzell t.ontra Costa Bill Gray Mike Walford E1 Dorado Art Cart Kent Taylor Fresno Henry Chin Kern Dale Mills ' Lassen John Mitchell Marin Ray Thomson Merced Verne L. Davis Lincoln Clendonin Supervi =nr Albert E. Bardini Monterey Bruce McClain Supervisor Barbara Shipnuck Mendocino C. F. Campbell Nevada Terry Lowell Sacramento Orrin / 4201, 1llh 8 L Bldg, I Sacramento, CA 95614 1 9161441.4011 ATSS 413.3727 Washington Office 1 440 First St., N.W., Suits 503 1 Washington, O.C. 20001 1 20211874576 ' -2- Orange Bill Zaun • Mary Jane Sylvia Karen Coker Placer John Maccoun Don Lunsford Sacramento D. W. McKenzie Jim Pay Supervisor Bill Bryan San Diego Rudy Massman Pat Gayman Chris Heiserman San Francisco Meredith Michaels San Mateo John Guilhamet Santa Barbara Lee- Steward Santa Cruz Don Porath George Newell Solana Supervisor Richard Brann 1010 L. Roberts After discussing the issue of Local Option Fuel Tax (LOFT), the county representative summarized the situation in their particular county: • Placer - The issue of a LOFT may not be considered until next year. The Board was considering a LOFT when faced with potential loss of Motor vehicle In -Liew revenues. Alameda - .Action in Alameda County may depend on decisions on other Bay Area counties. LOFT increases range from 2 to 5 cents per gallon. Thirteen cities in the county are willing, to support a LOFT. San Diego - There will definitely be a LOFT on the ballot in November. A two cents per gallon increase appear to be the range for the ballot. A public survey poll which has been completed in the county was discussed. An allocation formula with a base amount with the remainder of revenue being allocated by road mileage and p9pula- tion was explained. Senate Bill 1551 (Ellis) needs to be used as a vehicle for several technical amendments to the Senate Bill 215 process. Orange - There is a commitment to do a LOFT study. This could he placed before the votr.rs in November 1984. Assemhlv Bill ., -,285 (Robinson) dealing with an increase in the sales tax for transportation purposes is currently before the Legislature. This bill which is applicable only to Orange would generate approximately $75 million per one -half cent on the sales tax. • Monterey - The county has discussed a 5e LOFT with cities. Preliminary discussions with the cities have eliminated any potential new revenues for Caltrans. San Mateo - A decision by the supervisors on a LOFT is pending. The county is continuing to evaluate other Bay Area counties' considerntion of a tax proposal. Amador, Fresno, Kern, Lassen, Merced, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Yolo - There is not a LOFT currently being considered by the supervisors. The counties were attending the meeting to listen and learn about the issue. 81 Dorado - There is a strong move to place a LOFT measure on the haliot in Norcmber. The tax will probahly be it the z� por gallon level and a potr.ntiai allocation Cormuln with the Cities was outlined. The Board continues to review a LOFT proposal and is working with the cities. Results of this effort will be known within the next two weeks. Mendocino - The Board appears to be committed to put a LOFT measure on the ballot in November possibly at the 30 per gallon level. • There appears to be reasonable city support at this time. Several allocation formulae have been discussed with the final decision pending. n U Contra Costa - Several public works studies indicates there is a need for 5e LOFT. The county realizes the necessity for private sector support of any proposal. A public opinion survey was discussed which seems to indicate more public education is needed. In all probability, the county will not be seeking a LOFT in November. However, discussion with other Bay Area counties will continue. Santa Cruz - secure voter approval tfor 1e aJ benefit c asses smentctvpeyproposaL This effort was unsuccessful. The county will now seek a Zp per gallon LOFT in November, This tax increase will sunset after five years. The county feels that the recent election has provided a reasonable education process and feels the electornte hill new support a LOFT which is properly presented and relates to selected projects and programs. Sacramento - A LOFT is currently being discussed at the staff level.. However, city support Car a Sevember vote appears to be in question. l L. /, -q- Nevada - A LOI -T is serinnsEy being considered by the • Board and the cities. The final decision will he made within two weeks regarding a November vote and allocation process. Marin - The county is discussing a LOFT and is carefully evaluating Bay Area counties' efforts. Following this round table discussion by county representative, it was decided that CE'AC will contact counties after August 6th to prepare a final list of areas which will be going with a LOFT in November. Senate Rill 1531 will be closely monitored and appropriate technical amendments prepared and discussed with the author as soon as possible. Seveial legislative alternatives (i.e., sales tax options, benefit assessment alternatives, and modification to the current LOFT proces.,) willmnst likely be considered in 1983. These proposals will be closely monitored and reported to all counties. It was decided that a review of LOFT efforts and planning for the 1983 legislative session will be a main topic of discussion at the CSAC -CF.1C annual meeting in Los Angeles. ` VSP: 011: j Attachment • • i CV �Ifi xiXL\ fxx:vn' Seven Counties Seek Local Option Fuel Tax A Imal option gas tax will be on the Nm'embcr ballot in u,rn root'. stretching from San Me, to Humboldt. All but one of the measures provide for a hs mcent eat. Eaeh measure required ap- prmwl b, the lamed of supervisors and by a majnnty of the cites in the mum, representing a niajoru- ty of the population. Cuum,'.etty agreement nn the amount of the increase and how fund, will be client is also required. El Dorado County will wk a tvmmnl merease fm an mdrfmnr Period. Fundswill be disinion c] .5 percent bawd on population and 25 percent on Point of sale. needling to about 55 permnt of total funds going to the county reported Public Works Director An Cart. r\ U • Cocaine Amt. Duration EI Dorado- 2e Indefinite Humboldt 2c 5 rears Mann x a 'ears Mendocino 2e S vexes Nevada 2e 5i'ea. San Diego 2e Indefinite Santa Cnrz 2e 5 yea. \lades Counts is serial nga three. cent increase for four vears. Revenues will be dutribulrel 10 Percent equally to the count, and each city, with the rest on the same basis as current state gas tarn. The munty will receive roughly half the total. Funds are earmarked for repair, remmruc- tion and maintenance of reads. The Merin Count' Board• however. reported Director of Puhlic \forks Raf Thompson. has rescued the right to minor the meauue from the ballot and set an August 24 hearing date on the issue. Mendnei on Count, is asking for a two -cent o ,,irse o'er, three yean. County Administ aeh'e Of. ficer At Beltr.ms.ays rnvmoc will be allocated no a per capita basis wit h the cities, resulting in show a Bo percent portion for the coun- ty. Fonds world bruited for main. tenanec purposes. The neurone In \,,ad, Coun- i s i for a hvo.cent increase for fine }'ears. The more will rerei,e 71.2 percent of incomes. an amount haunt cooled, in Population and point of sale. Public \Yorks Diree- mr Teo Lowell wys n.u. are designated for specified road maintenance and improvement projects. San Diego Count, has placed on the ballot a two-cent increase for an indefinite time. Themunh and each eny will receive a Rat $100,000 each, plus an amount of remaining revenues based 25 per cent on mileage and 75 percent on population. About 20 per, nt of all revenues will go to the emmn. San Diego Regional Local Option Fuel Tax Coordinumr Ken Karnes said funds will be used for maintenance, con,tructione repairs and safety imprmements. In unincorporated Areas, only maintenance and repairs will be supported with the revenues. Damage from last w'inter's severe winter storms prompted Santa Cruz County to place on the ballot a is, .-cem increase for five )earn. Revenue will be used only for specified read repairs needed due to storm damage, said Phil Sanfilippo of the country' public works department. Revenues will he distributed no the buds of population, with about half the total att'U ng to Santa Cruz County. In Humboldt County, voters will Ix asked to approve • two- cent Increase for five year, so. cording to Public Works Direetm Gov Kulstad. Each cih, in the count, will be allocated $20,000 off the top. with remaining hods distributed on the bastard popular. Lion. Revenue can be used for the ,.me Proposes as gas tax funds from the state. 0 l J 9 y-} ewi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1962 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer • uG,aoAc >, z F. c7 r. a SUBJECT: Agreement with Flood Control District on Benefit Assessment Program 19-1-1 Attached for Council approval is the City- County Agreement on the distribution and management of Flood Control Benefit Assess- ment funds. Key features of the agreement are: • Prior approval of projects listed on Exhibit A. Amendments to projects may be made subject to joint approval of the agencies. • Maintenance responsibility outlined in Exhibit B. This section outlines current District maintenance with the addition of the Beryl- Hellman Storm Drain, and the Hermosa- Turner Drain (Pro- jects 1 s 2). • The City assumes an annual responsibility for administration of the program but may recover costs. • A key element not included in the agreement is credit provisions for fees and assessments used to construct drains prior to the assessment approval. Removal of these provisions were based on a County counsel legal opinion. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the City- County Agreement on administration of the Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program and authorize the Mayor to execute on their behalf. Respectfully so mitted, LDEE: d Attachment /.,C ('��- Y•._., COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD CONTRACT FOR COUNTY USE ONLY Co.., OWMlmml COO—, Numo,r Flood Control Coumy o.pntm.n, cecvK, e.pr.KnV,iM Cona. l.", 4c.nn rvumev: Lewis S. Neeb 2679 .R E.,. .udp., Unit No. Suoobj., No. Fund No J.D No. Ampunt o1 Con N/A N/A N/A N/A -0- Pral.�t "cdntr.d ba men tnm on. p.vmmt d,,..F1, dmpnn ,n. /dl lows np: P.N .nb Edim.u: A..r im.p Ampun, E.W THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereafter called the County, and N.m. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereafter called CITY AddNno 9320 BASE LINE, SUITE C - P.O. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (714) 989 -I BSI F'.do.l to N..., so��a sK�.nv No. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (Use space below and additional bond sheets. Set forth servic, to be mndemd, amount to be paid, manner of payment, time for performance or completion, determination of udsfactory performance and cause for trmrination, other terms and condidons, and attach plans, specificadons, and addenda, if my.) WHEREAS, the DISTRICT has a benefit assessment proposal on the ballot for November 2, 1982; and • WHEREAS, if this proposal is approved by the voters, eighty -seven percent of the money collected in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called CITY will be expended for construction purposes on projects requested and priori- tized by the CITY after deducting pro rata administrative costs of the Treasurer -Tax Collector, Clerk, Auditor- Controller, Registrar of Voters and Office of Management Services. The amount of these charges and justification to be submitted to the CITY for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and DISTRICT hereby agree as follows: 1. Projects within CITY shall require approval by CITY Council and governing board of the DISTRICT. Design plans shall require approval by DISTRICT if they connect to DISTRICT maintained facilities. 2. CITY shall design and administer construction of projects requested by CITY pursuant to separate agreements for each project, 3. DISTRICT shall fund projects within CITY including engineering, surveys, right -of -way acquisition, utility relocation and construction. 4. DISTRCT and CITY concur with priority project listing as noted In Exhibit A. • y ' etaoauaoo n.r. Upo 5. Before proceeding with any of the projects listed hereir 't. will be necessary for CITY and DISTRICT to agree that there do adequate downstream capacity for the project except for drains that totally begin and end within CITY and do not drain into DISTRICT facilities. • 6, CITY shall meet and confer with the public to answer questions and provide information about the assessment. 7. Administrative cost, incurred by CITY in the course of establishing parcel assessments, meeting and conferring with public and the like, may be reimbursed only if Measure "51" passes. E. DISTRICT shall maintain and operate existing and proposed regional facilities as shown in yellow within CITY as described on Exhibit "B ". The CTTY shall maintain and operate all other facilities within the CITY unless otherwise approved by separate agreement. 9. CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold the DISTRICT harmless from all claims or injury as defined in Government Code Section 810.8 arising from the use, operation or maintenance of facilities which are to be saintained by CITY under this agreement. 10. DISTRICT shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from all claims or injury as defined in Government Code Section 810,8 arising from the use, operation or maintenance of facilities which are to be maintained by DISTRICT under this agreement. 11. All funds held for the benefit of the CITY shall be deposited in a separate account and that account shall be credited with interest. • 12. This Agreement shall be terminated at such time as all funds under this program have been expended. COUNTY OF SAN BE RNA RDINO Chairman, Board of Suoervisors Dated _ ATTESTED: Clerk of the Bndru of Supervisors W .aumY Couma 00-13311,000 n.r. 11130 — .era rr JCa +�nrar nn „ <nmpe0v. ^rc,l By ► !Aulnm r.d s,,nv.ner Dated Title Address _ —e, A„ nn oeu `en,u Aumini,trator. CA V for J.E. PEDDY 0... •30.2 O2 EXHIBIT A SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL uISTRICT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT PROJECT LISTING BY PRIORITY PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME CSDP 4 LIMITS 1. Beryl - Hellman Drain 2 -F,2 -I S.P.R.R. @ Hellman to N/0 19th @ Beryl 2. Hermosa -Turner Drain 4- A,B,C,F Alta Loma Basin to Deer Creek plus lateral 3. Cucamonga Storm Drain 2 -J,2 -I Amethyst to Cucamonga Creek 4. Lower Hellman Storm 6- C,E,F,H,I Hellman Ave. - Palo Alto to Drain Cucamonga Creek with various side drains 5. Alta Loma Channel 3 -A,B,C Foothills to Alta Loma basins • plus side laterals • d fT IT- ----------- „ 1 � o A n• �, vA Ails A ,-i!CAifn - STAFF IMPORT <�V 0 1 F Date: October 4, 1982 U j 1977 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Letter of Intent to Reactivate Corps of Engineers Cucamonga Creek Trail System During the last several months we have been working out details of a partial reactivation of the Cucamonga Creek Recreation Element with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which was the subject of a basic conceptual 'overview' to Council at your meeting of September i. It is now appropriate to review the project in more detail, with its development commitment and associated ongoing maintenance costs. if it is the Council's desire to proceed, a formal letter from the Mayor to the Corps would be in order to start the ball rolling 'officially'. To this point, everything has been, 'unofficial'. This memorandum will present the project scope, the Corps suggested project improvements, the City staff revision of the Corps suggested project improvements, maintenance costs, and a proposed letter of intent from the City to the Corps. 0 0 0 The scope of the project is to make multi - purpose trail improvements along the Cucamonga Creek from the Rest Stop south of Base Line (shown on General Plan as a neighborhood park... currently under ownership by CCwD) northward to the Cucamonga Debris Basin, a distance of 3.58 miles, and, similar improvements along Demens from the Cucamonga confluence to the Demens Debris Basin, 3.2 miles, for a combined total of 6.78 miles. This is illustrated through Attachment "A ". This would serve as the first phase of the City multi- purpose trail system, providing an opportunity to ultimately connect to the Hillside Channel and Deer Creek. 0 0 0 The City has the option, as the proposed local sponsor, to choose the amenities within the project. In Attachment "B" you will find the "deluxe" model, with related costs, as proposed by the Corps, complete with murals painted inside the channel walls. Total price of this is $742,954 of which the City's share would be $371.477 payable in the Summer of 1984. continued... In Attachment "C", find a staff revision deleting several Corps suggested improvements, totaling $581,839 with a City share of $290,946. We further believe, that the Corps prices are heavily overstated in several areas, so • it would likely be less. Staff would recommend that Council review the option presented in "B" and "C" and develop a list of amenities which you would like to see. As a comment, in staff's opinion "B" is overbuilt and "C" presents a first class approach. However, the desired end result, a multi - purpose trail could be built "bare hones" and still be functional, as illustrated by Attachment "D ". This last example, deleting the entire rest stop at the confluence, has a price tag of $392,062 with the City's share being $196,031. In summary then, the options look like this: "B" - Corps proposal @ ...........$742,954 W /City share @ $371,477 "C" - Staff alternate @ ..........$581,839 w /City share @ $290,946 "D" - 'Bare bones' alternate @ ...$392,062 w /City share @ $196,031 Staff would recommend the type of concept outlined in "C" o c o Maintenance costs, derived in consultation xith the Public Works Division, would be similar in the "B" and "C" examples, with "D" being less due to deletion of one rest stop. This is the formula for calculation: Trails: Length x Width x Cost per S.F. - Total . 35,799' x 8' ay. x $0.03 . $8,592 Rest stop Parks @ approximately $0.20 per S.F. . $28,000 Total maintenance then could run as high as $36,592 per year for "B" and "C", with "D" at slightly less. This could be funded from the Maintenance Assessment District under study as this time, or from the General Fund Maintenance Account. 0 0 0 The funding source for construction, which would have to be committed in 1984, could come from Park Development Funds, the General Fund, or could be included as an item on a Park Bond issue. 0 0 0 The letter of intent, from the City to the Corps is attached, as "E ", along with its support documentation. (Incidentally, the dollar figure on page 2, item 2, is from option "C", which can be changed to reflect the desired level of participation of the Council.) 0 0 0 In summary, if the City is to implement a program of trails as called out •in the General Plan, no better opportunity than the one currently at hand is likely to present itself. If I can provide further information, please advise. (QCAM0NGA 6REF R4 —`-KH AJ IUN DEDEER CMkhK BRIS BASIN HILLSIDE C SAN ANTONIO SAN BERNARDIN UNTAINS EBRIS BASIN ,= HEIGHTS LEVEE DEMENSCREFIC DE�RI$BASjN y �2 ` /CC CUCAMO ACREEK �F C DES SBASINJ1ILLSIDel d PLNNED ERITAGE PARK ". EOUESTRIANPARK CITY OF UPLAND • CITY OF ONTARIO ST. 24TH ST. — -- ? SPEEDWAY PARK PARK_ -- HOLT BLVO.I > G ARI AD. O () SCA L r- IN 1`111 L5 Ati -,"+ DAB • CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL BIKE /EQUESTRAIN TRAIL SYSTEM PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 1. Base Line Road Rest /Staging Area /Community Park a. Parking (40 cars) . 20,000 sq. ft. @ $1.50 . $30,000.00 b. Turf (plus tillage, amend., etc.) . 75,000 sq. ft. @ $.30 . $22,500.00 C. Groundcover (etc.) . 60,000 sq. ft. @ $.20 • $12,000.00 d. Trees and Shrubs . Allow $14,000.00 e. Masonry, Slopes, etc. . 12,000 sq. ft. @ $3.00 - $36,000.00 f. Irrigation . 135,000 sq. ft. @ $.40 . $54,000.00 g. Restroom . Allow $45,000.00 h. Shade structures (timber beams, concrete foundation) (2) @ $8,000.00 . $16,000.00 i. Benches (6) @ $450.00 . $2,700.00 J. Signs . Allow $1,000.00 k. Picnic Tbles (8) @ $350.00 . $2,800.00 • 1. Drinking Fountain (2) @ $350.00 . $700.00 M. Water Supply . Allow $5,000.00 n. Sewage Disposal . Allow $6,000.00 0. Electrical Supply • Allow $6,500.00 P. Bicycle Path (2) @ $250.00 . $500.00 q. Railings above slopes . 700 l.f. @ $3.00 . $2,100.00 r. Mural Paintings . Allow $8,000.00 s. Equestrain /Bicycle Bridges . Allow $12,000.00 t. Bollards . Allow $300.00 U. Concrete Walks . Allow $6,000.00 V. Mounding . Allow $6,000.00 W. Horse Trough . Allow $350.00 X. Horse Hitching Post (2) @ $150.00 . $300.00 Y. Horse Ring, etc. . Allow $4,000.00 Subtotal $293,750.00 2. Confluence Rest Stop • a. Service Road /Walkways (asphalt) - 1,000 sq. ft. @ $2.00 $2,000.00 b. Turf Area (plus tillage, amend., etc.) . $1,200 sq. ft. @ $.35 . $420.00 fIT7'19C141nrnt "6 " • • n U c. Groundcover area . 1,500 sq. ft. @ $.20 - $300.00 d. Irrigation = 2,700 sq. ft. @ $.40 - $1,080.00 e. Trees and Shrubs . Allow $3,000.00 f. Restroom - Allow $35,000.00 g. water Supply - Allow $7,000.00 h. Sewage Disposal = Allow $8,000.00 i. Electrical Supply = Allow $8,500.00 j. Masonry Allow $10,000.00 k. Mounding = Allow $1,500.00 1. Shade Structure = Allow $4,000.00 M. Benches (3) @ $450.00 - $1,350.00 n. Signs . Allow $600.00 o. Picnic Tables (2) @ $350.00 - $700.00 P. Drinking Fountain = Allow $700.00 q. Combination Vehicle /Bike /Equestrian Bridge . Allow $22,000.00 r. Bollards - Allow $150.00 s. Bicycle Path . Allow $250.00 t. Horse Trough - Allow $350.00 U. Horse Hitching Post (1) @ $150.00 - $150.00 V. Waste Recepticle (2) @ $125.00 - $250.00 Subtotal $119,300.00 Equestrian: From Base Line to Demens Debris Basin (3.58 Miles) Bicycle: From Base Line to Beryl Avenue (3.2 Miles) 3. Trail systems - NOTE) Landscaping along channel reach is covered under the Cucamonga channel project (including street nodes) a. Grading, soil prep. etc. of Equestrian Trail (8 foot wide) _ 8' x 18,902' . $.14 - $21,170.00 b. 3' extension of existing C.L. channel fence = 17,000 l.f. x $6.50 - $110,500.00 (new C.L. W /3' extension post) C. Signs . Allow $3,000.00 d. Additional Landscape Upgrading = Allow $10,000.00 e. At grade crossings (3) @$3,200.00 = $9,600.00 f. Street /Trail Entrance Improvement - Allow $25,000.00 g. Ramp Deepening @Baseline Road - Allow $10,000.00 h. Typical Underpass (1) only 0$75,000.00 . $75,000.00 1. Trash receptacles (12) each @$250.00 . $3,000.00 j. Bollards or restrictive gates (19) @$400.00 = $7,600.00 • n , u • • Subtotal $274,870.00 Total $687,920.00 plus 8% Contingency $ 55,034.00 Grand Total $742,954.00 . /S CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL • BIKE /EQUESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE • 2. Confluence Rest Stop a. Service Road /Walkways (asphalt) . 1,000 sq. ft. 0$2.00 $2,000.00 ' b. Delete 197'rAC11,06V r °C Baseline Road Rest /Community Park a. Parking (30 cars) - 15,000 sq. ft. @$1.50 - $22,500.00 b. Turf (plus tillage, amend., etc.) - 75,000 sq. ft. @$.30 $22,500.00 - C. Groundcover (etc.) - 60,000 sq. ft. 0$.20 - $12,000.00 d. Trees and Shrubs : Allow $14,000.00 e. Masonry, Slopes, etc. = 12,000 sq, ft. @$3.00 - $36,000.00 f. Irrigation - 135,000 sq. ft. @$.40 - $54,000.00 g. Restroom - Allow $45,000.00 h. Shade structure (timber beams, concrete foundation) (2) @$81000.00 - $16,000.00 i. Benches (6) @$450.00 - $2,700.00 j. Signs - Allow $1,000.00 • k. Picnic Tables (8) @$350.00 - $2,800.00 1. Drinking Fountain (2) @$350.00 - $700.00 ' M. Water Supply - Allow $3,000.00 * n. Sewage Disposal a Allow $3,000.00 ' o. Electrical Supply - Allow $3,000.00 P. Bicycle Path (2) @$250.00 - $500.00 q. Railings above slopes - 700 l.f. @$3.00 . $2,100.00 ' r. Delete a. Equestrian /Bicycle Bridges s Allow $12,000.00 t. Bollards - Allow $300.00 U. Concrete Walks - Allow $6,000.00 V. Mounding s Allow $6,000.00 W. Horse Trough - Allow $350.00 X. Horse Hitching Post (2) 0$150.00 a $300.00 • y. Delete Subtotal $265,750.00 • 2. Confluence Rest Stop a. Service Road /Walkways (asphalt) . 1,000 sq. ft. 0$2.00 $2,000.00 ' b. Delete 197'rAC11,06V r °C • • • c. Groundcover area - 2,000 sq. ft. @$.20 . $400.00 d. Irrigation a 2,000 sq, ft. @$.40 w $800.00 e. Trees and Shrubs - Allow $3,000.00 f. Restroom - Allow $35,000.00 g. Water Supply - Allow $7,000.00 h. Sewage Disposal . Allow $8,000.00 i. Electrical Supply . Allow $8,500.00 j. Masonry Allow $10,000.00 k. Mounding Allow $1,500.00 1. Shade Structure - Allow $4,000.00 M. Benches (3) @$450.00 a $1,350.00 n. Signs - Allow $600.00 0. Picnic Tables (2) @$350.00 - $700.00 P. Drinking Fountain - Allow $700.00 q. Bike /Equestrian Bridge - Allow $12,000.00 r. Bollards - Allow $150.00 S. Bicycle Path . Allow $250.00 t. Horse Trough - Allow $350.00 U. Horse Hitching Post (1) 0$150.00 - $150.00 V. Waste Receptacle (2) @$125.00 - $250.00 Subtotal $108,700.00 Equestrian: From Base Line to Demens Debris Basin (3.58 Miles) Bicycle: From Base Line to Beryl Avenue (3.2 Miles) 3. Trail Systems - NOTEI Landscaping along channel reach is covered under the Cucamonga channel project (including street nodes) a. Grading, soil prep. etc. of Equestrian Trail (8 foot wide) 8' x 18,902' - S•14 - $21,170.00 b. Delete C. Signs - Allow $3,000.00 d. Additions Landscape Upgrading = Allow $10,000.00 e. At grade crossings (3) @$3,200.00 - $9,600.00 f. Street /Trail Entrance Improvement . Allow $25,000.00 g. Ramp Deepening @Base Line Road a Allow $10,000.00 h. Typical Underpass (1) only @$75,000.00 - $75,000.00 1. Trash receptacles (12) each @$250.00 - $3,000.00 J. Bollards or restrictive gates (19) @$400.00 - $7,600.00 0 Cn • . Denotes changes from Attachment "D" 11 • Subtotal $164,340.00 Total $538,790.00 plus 8% contingency $ 43,103.00 Grand Total $581,839.00 Ipv • CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL BIKE /EQUESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE * 1. Base Line Road Rest /Community Park + a. Parking (30 cars) = 15,000 sq, ft. @$1.50 = $22,500.00 b. Turf (plus tillage, amend., etc.) . 75,000 sq. ft. @$.30 $22,500.00 C. Groundcover (etc.) . 60,000 sq. ft. @$.20 = $12,000.00 d. Trees and Shrubs . Allow $5.000.00 * e. Delete f. Irrigation . 135,000 sq. ft. @$.40 - $54,000.00 g. Restroom = Allow 545,000.00 * h. Shade structure (timber beams, concrete foundation) $8,000.00 * i. Benches (3) @$450 +00 = $1,350.00 • + j. Delete * k. Picnic Tables (4) @$350.00 - $1,400.00 * 1. Drinking Fountain . $350.00 * M. Water Supply • Allow $3,000.00 + n. Sewage Disposal = Allow $3,000.00 * o. Electrical Supply . Allow $3,000.00 P. Bicycle Path (2) @$250.00 . $500.00 q. Railings above slopes . 700 l.f. @$3.00 $2,100.00 * r. Delete a. Equestrian /Bicycle Bridges . Allow $12,000.00 t. Bollards - Allow $300.00 * U. Concrete Walks . Allow $3,000.00 + V. Delete W. Horse Trough . Allow $350.00 X. Horse Hitching post (2) @$150.00 . $300.00 Y. Delete Subtotal $199,650.00 • ?97r,9cHlH-'Nr "D" 5 • • 2. Confluence Rest Stop - Delete Equestrian: From Base Line to Demens Debris Basin (3.58 Miles) Bicycle: From Base Line to Beryl Avenue (3.2 Miles) 3. Trail Systems - ROTEI Landscaping along channel reach is covered under the Cucamonga Channel project (including street nodes) a. Grading, soil prep. etc. of Equestrian Trail (8 foot wide) 8- x 18,902' a $.14 - $21,170.00 ' b. Delete • C. Delete d. Delete e. At grade crossings (3) @$3,200.00 . $9,600.00 f. Street /Trail Entrance Improvement - Allow $25,000.00 9. Ramp Deepening @Baseline Road - Allow $10,000.00 h. Typical Underpass (1) only @$75,000.00 . $75,000.00 1. Trash receptacles (12) each @$250.00 - $3,000.00 • • J. Bollards or restrictive gates (19) @$400.00 = $7,600.00 k. Bicycle /Equestrian bridge at confluence a $12,000.00 Subtotal $163,370.00 Total $363,020.00 plus 8s Contingency $ 29,042.00 • Denotes changes from Attachment "B" • Grand Total $392,062.00 it p„ C:M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •� J � ry.. Jon D. Mikels a' td pp Ch kh d J. By vet 11 ]amn. From -` V � -> RkM1W M. DnM1I Phillip D. scM1loewr 19)7 October 6, 1982 Colonel Paul W. Taylor District Engineer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Reference: Cucamonga Creek - Recreation Element Dear Colonel Taylor: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to assume local sponsorship of a series of recreation improvements along Corps constructed flood control facilities within our City limits. This would ultimately include provision of recreation amenities along Deer Creek, as well as the projet immediately at hand, the • Cucamonga Creek, with it's tributary, the Demens Channel. Our community, Colonel Taylor, has a history of demonstrated commitment to the development of a multi - purpose Trail system, using the Corps improvement as the focal point and "backbone" of a broad based local system. That commitment is evidenced through: 1. Rancho Cucamonga's adopted General Plan, which has a freestanding Trail Element, calling out the use of Flood Control rights -of -way for multi - purpose trail use, 2. The Recreation Element of the General Plan located future park sites, wherever possible, adjacent to the Trail System; 3, The City Council, heading a delegation of community members, offered opposing testimony before the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, when they considered and ultimately abandoned local sponsorship of the Corps' Recreation Element in 1979; 4. The City Council and the Community have consistently, after the action described in the preceeding paragraph occurred, directed our resources toward the reactivation of this much • needed project. A1-7-19ef/inevr aE„ 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE. C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 " RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 " I714) 989.1851 Cucamonga Creek - Recreation Element October 6, 1982 • Page 2 Specifically what we are proposing at this time to the Corps is as follows: 1. That a -concept" plan be formulated to cover Multi - Purpose Trail use of present Corps projects within Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide one -half of the total construction costs of these recreational trail improvements; whicb is estimated at this time to be $582,000; 3. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga will assume the liability and maintenance of these recreational trail improvements; and 4. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in concert with the Corps, will enter into an agreement for the design and construction of Phase I of the Cucamonga /Demens Trail improvements which are to occur two years hence. Phase I is generally described as that portion of Cucamonga • Creek as measured from a point 1,000 + /- feet south of Baseline Road, running north along the east portion of the Creek to the Debris Basin; and, the Demens Channel, running on the north and south aide of the channel from it's confluence with the Creek, in a north - easterly direction to a terminus beyond the Demens Debris Basin. The City of Rancho Cucamonga sincerely appreciates the help and guidance of your staff at the Corps, who have been meeting with us informally to discuss the reactivatin of this project. May we hear from you at your earliest convenience? Thank you. Cordially, JDM:nm • Jon D. Mikela Mayor It f„ 0 GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 Recommended for Adoption by Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission this 17th day of February, 1981 By Resolution No. 81 -13 Adopted by Rancho Cucamonga City Council This 6th day of April, 1981 By Resolution No. 81 -40 46 • • • RIDING, HIKING, BICYCLING TRAILS Opportunities exist within Rancho Cucamonga for the provision of trails for transportation and recreation usage. Horseback riding, hiking, jogging, running, walking and bicycling can all be accommodated in some way within Rancho Cucamonga. One of the secondary benefits of the many flood control channels lacing through the City is the availability of right -of -way for trail purpose. These rights -of -way were once part of the San Bernardino County Recreational Plan, providing for multipur- pose usage; i.e. bicycles, hiking, and equestrian. In northern Alta Loma residential develop- ment has provided for equestrian use. How- ever, there were no consistent design stan- dards employed resulting in inadequate trail systems, and a fragmented collection of easements within various tract developments; the majority of • which lack standard trail widths, uniform design, and development. Many trails empty into the street or dead- J end at walls, fences, ravines, or flood control channels. The Trails Plan deals with two areas; the resolution of existing trail problem areas within developed residential areas; and, a consistent policy for a trail system for new development where appropriate. Trail Concept The objective of the trail system is to delineate an overall network of intercon- necting trails which are integrated with recreation areas, parks, open spaces, resi- dential and commercial and industrial areas. The overall trail concept is based upon three components; - Regional Multi- purpose trails - Community trails - Local Feeder trails The Regional Multi-purpose Trails are the backbone of the system. They are re- served, extended long distance corridors, and serve as the main connectors to the 110 r OUESTRIAN /RURAL AREA 'SIGNATION i 111 regional parks, scenic canyons, the national forest, other major open spaces, residential, commercial and industrial areas. The Community Trails provides the user with access to the Regional Multi- purpose Trails to community facilities such as Heritage Park, Alta Loma Park, Base Line Park, Elementary, Junior and Senior High Schools, Shopping Centers and the Regional Shopping Center. Community Trails extend through the community along water ways, utility corridors, public rights -of -way, easements, and along streets having adequate parking width. Community trails that extend South- erly of the shaded area of the Equestrian/ Rural Area, should not be required to pro- vide for equestrian usage - except in areas where continuity of the system is needed. These trails form loops of varying length and act as the initial link of unifying the existing disjointed Local Feeder Trails. Local Feeder trails, not identified on the map, are contained within subdivisions and enable the user access from their residential lot to the Community or Regional Multipur- pose Trail, residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. Emphasis should be placed on establishing appropriate Local Feeder Trails at the time of subdivision approval or development review. OBJECTIVE The objective below and subsequent policies in conjunction with those expressed in the circulation sub - element, shall be used to develop the Trail System. Provide an interconnected system of riding, bicycling and hiking trails which: Have safe access and travel to neighbor- hood, city, regional parks; recreational facilities, scenic areas, residential, commercial and industrial areas; - are aesthetically pleasing and create a "country and rural atmosphere" by integrating natural areas and urban J Y`:y �9 i lti areas with well planned linear open spaces. POLICIES o That the area as shown in the Equestrian/ Rural designated area provide for: - The keeping and protection of animals on private property, including equine, bovine, cleft- hoofed animals, and poul- try. - Require that all development within the area relate to existing and future areas occupied by equine, bovine, cleft - hoofed animals and poultry by providing trail connections through easements in order to connect disconnected trails and for needed access to recreation activities. - That all trail easement shall be main- tained through an active program of weed abatement in a neat and orderly manner on all developments. • • The City should promote programs for / improving existing trails such as removing existing barriers on trail systems to make the trails safer, more functional, and accessible to adjacent trails, • The City shall establish a master trail system which provides for: 112 - Regional Multi- Purpose Trails which con- nect to regional recreation areas, resi- dential, commercial and industrial areas. - Community Trails which connect residen- tial areas, local activity centers, and the regional shopping center and the Region- al Multi- Purpose Trail system. - Local Feeder Trails which connect indi- vidual residential lots to the Community and Regional Trail System. o The City shall facilitate the development of a Regional Multi-Purpose Trail System as shown on Figure III -7. All segments of the regional Multi- Purpose trail system, shall be available for use as equestrian, pedestrian and bike trails where feasible. Ir J 1 • S KpAMW N.Tg LFO ST i i Figure III-7 MASTER PLAN OF TRAILS TRAIL SYSTEM —• EXISTING COMMUNITY ^.PROPOSED COMMUNITY — REGIONAL MULTI - SYSTEM ZT:P. L_�] PROPOSED PARKS 0 EXISTING PARKS SCHOOLS' [jnij EXISTING SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS n CIVIC /COMMUNITY CENTER PROPOSED RECREATION AR = EQUESTRIAN /RURAL AREA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN O. _ _. `I y�1 • • The City shall establish an agreement with San Bernardino County for the use and maintenance of the Flood Control Rights - of -Way for the Trails. • The City shall establish an agreement with public and private utilities for the use and maintenance of utility corridors and Rights -of -Way for trail purposes. • All new development shall be developed in accordance with the Master Plan of Trails and adopted City Design Standards. • Trails shall be maintained on natural sur- faces and located along natural, physical features where ever possible. o The City shall establish a liason committee including members from the local riding club, the Planning Commission, the City Council, the City Staff and other memebers at large to review all reidential projects in the City for trail usage. o Any new development should consider prior existing bicycling, pedestrian and eques- trian access and traditional travel routes through the property. Non - residential development should con- sider use of amenities, for equestrian, pedestrian and bicycling activities such as hitching posts, benches, rest areas, drinking fountains and bike stands. o Whenever possible, along Community Trails, street trees and landscaping should be included into the design adjoining the trails. The pallet of trees should conform to street tree standards but be low main- tenance and drought tolerant. The City shall consider a program for the maintenance, and where necessary, con- struction and rehabilitation, of Community Trails. o Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall require that all residential lots in the equestrian rural area have Local Feeder Trails on the rear of the lot. 114 T.K< rpw...V I �7 • • The City shall establish an agreement with San Bernardino County for the use and maintenance of the Flood Control Rights - of -Way for the Trails. • The City shall establish an agreement with public and private utilities for the use and maintenance of utility corridors and Rights -of -Way for trail purposes. • All new development shall be developed in accordance with the Master Plan of Trails and adopted City Design Standards. • Trails shall be maintained on natural sur- faces and located along natural, physical features where ever possible. o The City shall establish a liason committee including members from the local riding club, the Planning Commission, the City Council, the City Staff and other memebers at large to review all reidential projects in the City for trail usage. o Any new development should consider prior existing bicycling, pedestrian and eques- trian access and traditional travel routes through the property. Non - residential development should con- sider use of amenities, for equestrian, pedestrian and bicycling activities such as hitching posts, benches, rest areas, drinking fountains and bike stands. o Whenever possible, along Community Trails, street trees and landscaping should be included into the design adjoining the trails. The pallet of trees should conform to street tree standards but be low main- tenance and drought tolerant. The City shall consider a program for the maintenance, and where necessary, con- struction and rehabilitation, of Community Trails. o Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall require that all residential lots in the equestrian rural area have Local Feeder Trails on the rear of the lot. 114 0 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 29, 1982 FR City Council Q FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman �_U�/`/` City Manager SUBJECT: City /County Conference The County of San Bernardino has invited city representatives to participate in a one and one -half day conference to be scheduled November 4th and 5th in Lake Arrowhead. The purpose of the joint meeting is to provide a forum for the cities and counties to discuss areas of mutual concern such as spheres of influence, redevelopment, and other issues. In addition to the city manager from each community, the County has asked each city council to designate a representative to attend the meeting. It is important that we let the County officials know who will be attending from the City Council. LMW:has attach. 14 AGENDA CITIES /COUNTY CONFERENCE Lake Arrowhead Hilton Hotel NOVEMBER 4, 1982 12:00 noon - 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. 3:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Arrival and Registration Annexations and Spheres of Influence Break Redevelopment 5:30 p.m. Adjourn 6:30 p.m. Dinner NOVEMBER 5, 1982 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. 10:15 a.m 10 :30 a.m Breakfast County -City Contracts Economic Development Break Strategy for Financing Local Government (Countering School Legislative Pressure) Review of US Festival County Medical Center 12:00 noon Adjourn ?5 Is lJ n U CITY OF RAN'Qi0 CI;GkMO \Gk Goo c«^ xr STAFF REPORT < Date: September 30, 1982 1977 To: City Council and City Manager From: Hill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Park Advisory Commission and the Citizens' Advisory Commission Per Council direction of September tat, staff members in the persons of Lauren Wasserman and this writer, presented to the CAC the concept of the Park Advisory Commission as now under study by Council. Also in attendance at that September 23rd meeting were Councilmembers Huguet and Frost. The packet forwarded to CAC in advance of the meeting included the "guidelines" prepared by staff (previously reviewed by Council) and two memorandums on the subject by Councilman Dahl relating to Commission 'purposes' and 'membership make -up'. After a brief staff presentation of the subject, and the relaying of • Council's request for CAC input, Chairman Mendez opened the meeting for discussion. The substance of which follows: • The CAC felt that any Ordinance adopted to create a PAC should be more flexible than the quidelines as presented. For example, the guidelines list a manner for conducting the meetings. CAC felt this was too restrictive to good PAC operation...it should be a less formal body to facilitate discussion and operation. • The CPC felt that the PAC was somewhat of a duplication of the CAC mission, in that the purpose of PAC was to provide a broad base of community involvement in an area of the governmental processes... CAC felt that was their role. o The CAC felt uncomfortable with allocating seats to specified special interest groups, such as Little League or Soccer. • The CAC voted to recommend to Council that at least one seat of the PAC, if formed, should be given to a CAC member to facilitate good inter - Commission communications. • Nacho Gracia, felt that a single purpose body, such as the PAC would be a good organization, and referenced the work of the Friends of the Park in the Cucamonga /Guasti controversy last • year. The preceding then, are the highlights of the CAC meeting in regards to the PAC. 7, Staff awaits specific Council direction on what items (membership, duties, etc.) you wish included in the Ordinance which will create the Park Advisory Commission. A draft Ordinance can be provided to Council within two weeks from the date of that direction. If I can provide further information, please advise. aN /mw 177 • • , Cctober 6, 1982 t�:ayor and T,embers of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Gentlemen, There is nothing more frustrating to those who wish to have a voice in the decision - making process of government, than the myriad eetlnF,s which take place each month. In any given month, it is necessary for those who desire to keep themselves abreast of the goings -on i.n this city to attend City Council, Planning Commission, Citizens' Advisory Commission, Historic Preservation Commission and Citizen's Participation Advisory Committee meetings. This is, of course, in addition to any specific plan, flood control district, school district or other civic meetings which may take place. Add to these the responsibilities of a family and a career or commitment to a church or sport, and you can understand why not even the City Council nor the City Manager is able to find the time to attend them all. To create ,yet another city commission only compounds the problem. While on the surface this appears to provide a forum for public input, in reality it does just the opposite. H6W many residents usually attend city meetings? Except for the dedicated few, the number is not large. This is not from lack of interest, but from an inability to spend so much time away from home. The disadvantages of creating a new body to act as a separate park commission far outweigh this one apparent advantage. This duplication of effort could cause confusion as to the duties of the various committees and commissions. It would not be an efficient use of manpower, either that of city staff or community members. It would not be utilizing the expertise nor the agencies which already exist. Finally, at a time when the City Council, Advisory Commission, 'A rr Y Y• end the community seek to expand the duties of the Citizens' Advisory Commission, the proposal to create a separate park commission mould have the opposite effect. As became clear during the General Plan process and the last election, parks are quite important to members of this community. While creating a separate nark commission may seem politically advantageous, it does not best suit the needs of the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Directing the Citizens' Advisory Commission to sit as the Park Commission as needed (much as the City Council sits as the Redevelopment Agency) is more efficient and responsible. 4Re peptfal , r S. Romero Citizens' Advisory Comm. September 10, 1992 Terry Nemer City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Department Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Nemer: I wish to bring it to your attention that a hazardous condition exists for our children crossing Turner from the area known as "North Town" at 24th d 25th Streets. Children attending the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School and Cucamonga Elementary School have to cross Turner on the way to and from school daily. As the chief administrator for the Cucamonga School District 1 am most con,:erned with the fnliowing: No sign regarding school No cross walk for pedestrians Possible inappropriate speed limit Normal route to and from two schools I am fully conscious that procedures need to be followed, however, would it be considered appropriate if I were to request a speedy solution to the problem? As we increase in growth, it gives me great concern that a dangerous situation is allowed to continue and that the city will allow itself to get "bogged" down with "red tape." I would be most happy to meet with you, at your con venei Price, to discuss this matter in greater depth. RV:ac R x w Sincerely, r Roberto VN:lasgyez> Superintendent Cucamonga School District � BDA„D a TNUt•T[w r �, 8776 AEch,baid Avrnm �,A "ouvnvnq Rancho Luanmbnga. Canton„ 917:N0 "� '.NAWEDIID ' Tolepho.e 1714) 981 -041 oewcu emgnv .,qv�o uwu �,q,A, IDNCDN RI.I.TD VELA.DVET September 10, 1992 Terry Nemer City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Department Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Nemer: I wish to bring it to your attention that a hazardous condition exists for our children crossing Turner from the area known as "North Town" at 24th d 25th Streets. Children attending the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School and Cucamonga Elementary School have to cross Turner on the way to and from school daily. As the chief administrator for the Cucamonga School District 1 am most con,:erned with the fnliowing: No sign regarding school No cross walk for pedestrians Possible inappropriate speed limit Normal route to and from two schools I am fully conscious that procedures need to be followed, however, would it be considered appropriate if I were to request a speedy solution to the problem? As we increase in growth, it gives me great concern that a dangerous situation is allowed to continue and that the city will allow itself to get "bogged" down with "red tape." I would be most happy to meet with you, at your con venei Price, to discuss this matter in greater depth. RV:ac R x w Sincerely, r Roberto VN:lasgyez> Superintendent ADULT CROSSING U< -RD WARR4NT CALC P=TE II 71: CI I ''n -^.� SATE z MAJOR ST. -Y,„ . r.- � _CRITIC: L . ^PPF - -ACr- SPEED °i' mph. MINOR SL_.',-.; s r.•,•. UNCONTROLLED CROSSING NARRANT I — MINIMU;! VOLW,IE satisfied: NO L1J YES MAJOR ST. TWO HOURS WHEN OR APPR. SPD. NO. OF VEH. STUDENTS CROSS c= - ° - < 40 35 0 veh, .- NZ Y Lj I 140 i 300 vch� I,❑ Y� PEDESTRIAN VOLUME MAJOR ST. TWO HOURS WHEN APPR. SPO. NO.OF PEDS. STUDEHTS CROSS <40 =T -I 40 peds. i,.- :N[ :]YE -' X40 Pe0 . UNDIVIDED I N STOP SIGN CONTROLLED CROSSING WARRANT I — NUMBER OF LANES satisfied: NOF. YES n UNDIVIDED AND FOUR OR MORE LANE^ j Mlt•II %IUM VOLUidE TWO HOURS WHEN VEHICLES PER HOUR STUDENTS CROSS 500 vpn. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM October 18, 1982 .5 �n f j. TO: City Councilmembers FROM: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor SUBJECT: Additional Council Business Item (7B). Discussion of Possible Council Position on Water Resources Conversation and Efficiency Act (Prop. 13) Proposition 13 on the November ballot is considered to be one of the more important issues to come before the voters of California. If passed, this proposition has the potential of increasing home and commercial water rates, and preventing new irrigation projects from taking place. In addition, this measure would prevent local water agencies from selling or trading surplus water supplies without the approval of a five-member board appointed by the Governor. I believe this to be an important matter we should discuss at our Wednesday, October 28, 1982 meeting (Item 7B). Attached is a resolution in opposition to Proposition 13. G' RESOLUTION NO. 82 RESOLUTION CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN OPPOSITION TO WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY ACT (PROPOSITION 13) NOVEMBER 2, 1982, GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT. WHEREAS, an initiative measure titled Water Resources, Statutory Initiative, has been qualified and will appear on the November 2, 1982 general election ballot as Proposition 13; and WHEREAS, this measure would enact substantial and far- reaching changes to California water law by adding a new Division 8 to the Water Code to be known as the Water Resources Conservation and Efficiency Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga now, as in the past, has opposed the waste of water and supports the efficient use of water; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is taking a leading role in promoting use of environmentally sound and cost - effective sources of rater such as use of reclaimed wastewater, groundwater storage, water exchanges, and new local water projects; and WHEREAS, the measure contains a number of provisions that would affect the City and its r)sidents, such as: The requirement that comprehensive water conversation programs be prepared, submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board, and approved before there can be increased importation of water, which leaves the ultimate decisions as to the future water supply of Southern California to that State Board; 2. The policy that the use of property taxes be reduced or eliminated for the payment of the costs of water development which would have the effect of making present water users pay for the portion of water facilities required to serve future needs and beneficiaries; 3. The consideration that water rate increases intended to reduce water usage be included in the water conservation plans submitted to the State Board; 4. The proposal to grant rights to appropriate water for instream uses (fish, wildlife and recreation) with a preference for such uses, which may have the result of reducing the water supply available to the State Water Project for public consumption; 5. The many legal ambiguities and will foster lengthy litigation. Resolution No. 82 -0 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California finds that, if enacted, the Water Resources Statutory Initiative (Proposition 13) would represent a real, substantial threat to the security of the future water supply of this District and the people of Southern California and in particular; 1. To the fulfillment of the obligation of the State of California to supply the State Water Contractors their entitlements of Water; 2. To any increased use of Colorado River Water, if available; and 3• To the groundwater management and replenishment programs of Southern California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opposes the adoption of the Water Resources Initiative Measure (Proposition 13) on the November 2, 1982 general election ballot. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of 0, 19f. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. A meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, October 6, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: City Council Members Rich:,rd M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holly; and Finance Director, Harry Empey. Approval of Minutes: Jim Robinson requested minutes of August 18 and September 1 be continued to the October 20, 1982 meeting. Council concurred. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Councilman Buquet announced Councilman Frost was recently installed as president of the Citrus Belt Division of the League of California Cities. b. Mayor Mikels announced he had attended a meeting on the Route 30 Corridor Group on Tuesday, October 5, and attended a meeting October 6, regarding the County Transportation Commission and Sanbag and presented a brief report. c. Monday, October 4, Councilman Buquet attended a protest hearing before the Board of Supervisors on Measure "W ". d. Councilman Frost announced the first public hearing of the Etiwanda Specific Plan was to be held Thursday, October 21, 1982 before the Planning Commission. e. Mayor Mikels stated the Wine Festival begins October 14. The Miss Rancho Cucamonga Beauty Contest takes place Saturday, October 8. Councilman Buquet informed the Council they were invited by the Chamber of Commerce to participate in a grape stomping event at the Wine Festival. f. October 17 through October 20 is the annual meeting of League of California Cities. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -10 -6 in the total amourt of $278,875.34. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application, for on -sale beer and wine eating place by Tony E. Mosallam, Lorenzo's Deli, 9799 Base Line, Suite A. _ by K. Elsherif, Elsherif's Mobil Service, 10477 Lemon Street. e. Forward Claim by Alice Joan Field and Harley Kenneth Smith to the City Attorney for handling. f. Forward Claim by Michael Dudek to the City Attorney for handling. g. Acceptance of Agreements, Security, and Final Maps for Tract Nos. 11663, 12019, and 12020 - Marlborough Development, located east of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street, west of Ramona Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAPS FOR TRACT NOS. 11663, 12019, AND 12020. h. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 6557 Mulberry Avenue submitted by James and Lorraine O'Brien. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JAMES AND LORRAINE O'BRIEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. i. It is recommended that Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 to allow the project contract to add an additional contractor to Assessment District 82 -1. j. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7555, Bonds, and Agreement; and Vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue - R. C. Industrial Company. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7555, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. RESOLUTION NO, 82 -165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PITTSBURG AVENUE. k. Authorization for Public Works Inspector, Mike Long, be named the Resident Inspector for the Industrial Assessment District. Recommend also that a salary adjustment be granted to begin after confirmation of assessments and to continue through completion of the District. Upon completion of the District, salary would return to the current pay Vineyard Avenue between 8th Street and Arrow Route to the low bidder, Red Hill Construction Co. of Santa Ana, for $241,564.50. Also recommend approval be given for the execution of a Utilities Agreement and a Joint Use Agreement between the City and Southern California Edison Company for necessary power line relocations. M. Approval of Resolution to destroy personnel applications which are two years or more old per Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090. Set public hearing date of October 20, 1982 for Environmental Assessment and Zone Change 82 -02- Browne. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agricultural) to R -1 (single family residential) for .96 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane - APN 1077- 071 -01. It is recommended that Council approve the Resolution which sets forth the detailed procedure required by state law for the issuance of bonds for Assessment District 82 -1. These bonds cover the remaining $8,890,516 of assessments which were not paid in cash during the 30 -day collection period. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS AND ISSUING BONDS UNDER THE "IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915" It is recommended that Council approve the escrow instructions for purchase of right -of -way for Assessment District 82 -1. This right -of- way represents a cost of $80,000 covered by the "incidental" portion of the Assessment District, and provides right -of -way for realignment of Rochester Avenue. It is recommended that Council approve easement agreements covering the offers of dedication and deeds which have provided rights -of -way for street and storm drains in Assessment District 82 -1. The agreements provide for a total payment of $441,743 from District right -of -way funds. It is recommended that Council approve the resolution accepting offers of dedication for street and storm drain easements within Assessment District 82 -1. The offers represent purchases made with District right -of -way funds and acceptance by resolution fulfills statutory requirements. OF DEDICATION l STRCETb 1 ) L;TORM A. , IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1. S. Acceptance of the storm drain improvement agreement and security for CUP 82 -1 - Etiwanda Investment Co. (Pic -N- Save). RESOLUTION NO. 82 -175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 82 -1. t. Approval of subordination agreement from Lesney Development Co. for Tract No. 11350, located at the northwest corner of Ease Line Road and Hermosa Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM LESNEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. U. It is recommended that Council approve the agreement for inspection services between the City and Hotch Bedrosian for Assessment District 82 -1. V. Authorization request to advertise for bids for the resurfacing and reconstruction of Carnelian Avenue from Highland Avenue to Wilson Street, north of 19th Street. This is the first priority project on the City's Capital Improvement Program) estimated cost about $200,000. W. It is recommended that Council authorize the Finance Director to purchase two mid -size pickup trucks for the Assessment District 82 -1 project inspectors from Mark Christopher Chevrolet, Ontario, lowest bidder at $17,359.98. X. Forward Claim by Joan M. Mason, William F. Von Ruben and Carol Jean Von Ruben to the city attorney for handling. Y. Approval of Warrant Register, Assessment District 82 -1 for September 30, 1982 in the amount of $863,579.01. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81- 04- WILSON. A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 (single family residential - 20,000 sq. ft. lot minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (single family residential - 1n,OOO sq. ft. lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyon Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue APN 201- 251 -63 and 64. Report presented by Jack Lam. __ No. __, ORDINANCE NO. 183 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 251 -62 AND 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R- 1- 10,000. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of the ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance 183. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. 4B. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES. An ordinance establishing public notification procedures for projects requiring Planning Commission public hearing. First reading continued from September 15, 1982 Council meeting. Presented by Jack Lam. Jim Robinson read the titles of Ordinance 184 and Resolution 82 -168. ORDINANCE NO. 184 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 79- 1, REESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of the Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Frost expressed concern regarding the extremely low figure of $21.00 and recommended that "Notice of Hearing" be replaced with "Notice of Planning Commission Hearing ". He also suggested that at the end of the year the fees could be re- evaluated. Mayor Mikel set second reading for Ordinance No. 184 for October 20, 1982 and to consider Resolution 82 -168 at the same time. 4C. PROPOSED CHANGES IN ORDINANCE NO. 70. An Ordinance to establish Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest designations by a Resolution. Presently such designations are made by Ordinance. Report presented by Bill Holley. There being no further response, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Jim Robinson read the title of Ordinance 70 -E. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -E (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS D, E, AND F OF SECTION 2.24.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROCEDURE. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of the ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikel set second reading for October 20, 1982. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. In. nnanu Ur wNinaer Putt Vr IUN SERVICES FOR HERITAGE PARK. Recommended that design services for Heritage Park be awarded to Recreation Systems, Inc., the low bidder, in the amount of $72,480. Staff report by Bill Holley. Councilman Schlosser inquired as to how many firms located in the city had given bids. Bill Holley responded that this design effort was specialized, and we had no firms located in Rancho Cucamonga that we could contract with. Councilman Schlosser recommended we should contract with local firms if possible. Councilman Buquet asked if it were advertised. Bill Holley replied that several years ago a file was collected with names of design firms whose work was liked. Also local firms would be aware of upcoming work in the city and would contract with the prime contractor. Ron Page, Recreation Systems, Inc. stated he appreciated our desire to work with local firms, and makes it a point to work with local subcontractors. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to award contract for Heritage Park design services to Recreation Systems, Inc. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 513. ALTA LOMA PARK RENOVATIONS. Options for improving and redeveloping the Alta Loma Park. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Considerable discussion was held regarding installation of sod vs. stolens. Also the following concerns were expressed. 1. Costs 2. Need for topsoil 3. Sod vs. stolens 4. Fencing Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to refer back to staff to conduct further study. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5C. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR NORTH TOWN PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS. Award of contract for street improvements for Center Street and Main Street. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Councilman Frost asked if only one responsible bidder responded. Mr. Hubbs replied that it was advertised in the local newspaper and there were only two responses. The additional bid was submitted by Frontier, but on further study staff found that Frontier was not licensed to do this particular project. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to award contract to American Construction. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. 5D. LOCAL GAS TAX OPTION. The San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control are seeking a statement of interest in the implementation of a local gas tax option. If approved by a majority of the cities, the issue would be presented to the voters for ratification. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Mr. Hubbs stated that in order to rebuild streets, there needs to be some adjustment in the gas tax. The twenty cent increase effective the latter part of 1983 will only put us where we are at this time. Mayor Mikels indicated the longer we wait for maintenance, the more additive costs we will have in the future. Mr. Hubbs recommended we indicate to the Board of Supervisors we want them to look into this further and return with more facts. At that time the City Council may be requested to put this issue on a formal ballot. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to transmit a response to the Board of Supervisors indicating Rancho Cucamonga's interest in further study of the local gas tax option. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5E. AGREEMENT WITH FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ON BENEFIT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Review and approval of an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District concerning the administration of funds and projects under the proposed Zone "We Benefit Assessment Program going before the voters on November 2, 1982. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Mayor Mikels stated we have done a good job protecting the interests of Rancho Cucamonga, and each city will be negotiating this agreement with the County separately should the benefit assessment program be approved by the voters. Councilman Buquet expressed his desire for the measure to pass since 87% would be coming back to the city. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve the City- County Agreement on administration of the Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program. or. REACTIVATION OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM. Authoriva tion for the Mayor to sign Letter of Intent to the Army Corps of Engineers petitioning for the reactivation of a portion of the Cucamonga Creek Recreational Trail System. Staff report by Bill Holley. Mr. Holley stated that it is a first class presentation of a good basic trail system with attractions that users will enjoy and a valuable asset to the community. Councilman Dahl inquired if the improvement of entrances was included in this system. Mr. Holley replied that nodes were separate. Also he felt the Corps costs were heavy in utilities and entry necessities, but the estimate was good because it gave more leeway. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. • Chris Benoit expressed thanks for an excellent opportunity for the city to be in the trail system and if the bridge were placed under 19th and 16th Streets, the Cucamonga Creek would be used more heavily than now. • Sharon Romero stated this would give the children a way to cross the channel without going through traffic. Pam Henry stated we may not have another opportunity to have someone else absorb half the cost. In addition, there were some concerns that the intended Base Line Park area would be developed rather than being set aside as a park. She thanked Bill Holley for re- activating this Project and stated it was a much safer mode of recreation. There being no further response, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Mikels stated there were several options to consider. Councilman Dahl stated that Option C gives the most benefit and best cost. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to approve Attachment C as outlined in the staff report for a total cost of $581,839, with the City share of $290,946. Councilmen Dahl commended Bill Holley for a job well done on the project. Mr. Horton stated the existing areas were hardly ever used and if only a few people took advantage of the trails, he felt it would not be cost effective. Mr. Holley stated it was not only an equestrian unit but a multi- purpose project. Councilman Buquet stated part of the area was not accessible now that would be opened by the trail system. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Councilman Frost volunteered to be Council representative at the Conference. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr. Dougherty had an item that involved pending litigation to be handled in Executive Session. ADDED ITEM: HOLLER CITY. At this time local resident, Mr. Horton, referred to the September 24 article in the Daily Report regarding improper behavior at Roller City. He stated the situation had improved after his letter was published, however, he would continue monitoring the Roller City. Lauren Wasserman stated the Sheriff's Department would be making patrol stops more frequently. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS. 7A. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO ALTA LOMA ADVISORY COMMISSION. A vacancy has been created on the Advisory Commission by the resignation of Helen Blanchard. Her term of office runs through November, 1985. Jim Robinson asked if we should appoint from the existing list or advertise as in the past. Advertisement in the past had been to send notices to various organizations and notify other members of the Advisory Commission. Advertising was more word of mouth rather than official notifications. Mayor Mikels suggested if anyone had names to submit to do so. 7B. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARRS ADVISORY COMMISSION. At Council direction, staff presented to the Citizens Advisory Commission the concept of a Parks Advisory Commission for review and input. Report by Bill Holley. Councilman Frost stated an ordinance needed to be drafted for concepts of a commission. Mayor Mikels open the meeting for public hearing. * Jim Mendez, 9630 Effen, stated the Parks Commission should be phased in as the need arises and each of the three communities should have representatives. • Paul Saldana, 8649 Pine supported a Parks Commission independent from the Citizens Advisory Commission. • Sharon Romero, speaking for Joe White, stated there seems to be an overlap in responsibility with the Citizens Advisory Commission; Parks Commission should be an extension of the Citizens Advisory Commission. • Sharon Romero, speaking for Anne Calinsky, stated the Citizens Advisory Commission now advises the City Council on matters relating to parks. at a t. • Pam Henry, 9013 Caballero, is hopeful that we have an active Parks Commission whether it is an extension of the Citizens Advisory Commission or separate. Mayor Mikels stated the previously approved concept of a Parks Commission was referred to Citizens Advisory Commission for input. Councilman Buquet concurred by stating City Council direction was not for the Citizens Advisory Commission to decide whether the group should be a separate body or part of the Citizens Advisory Commission. Councilman Frost stated the Parks Commission issue was referred to the Citizens Advisory Commission for comment, review, and suggestions. Councilman Buquet questioned the impact and cost of creating another commission and whether it would be an effective body vs, something we already have. Councilman Dahl felt the issue is whether or not the method is as effective as it could be. Formation of a Parks Commission would not negatively affect our city's direction but could positively affect it. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to direct staff to draft an ordinance, and refer to the Citizens Advisory Commission for their input, and returning the issue to the November 3, 1982 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 7C. DIRECT ELECTION OF MAYOR. Councilman Dahl requested the Citizens Advisory Commission once again review the issue of directly elected mayor and get public input from their areas. • Nacho Gracia stated the commission has had time to get community input. 0 Livia Valiance would not recommend a directly elected mayor, but feels it should be placed on the ballot for community input. • Sharon Romero stated there has been sufficient input from the community. Council concurred with Mr. Dahl and referred the item back to the CAC for further input. 8. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m. to an Executive Session, not to reconvene. Respectfully submitted, Mary Kuhn Acting Deputy City Clerk