HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/11/17 - Agenda Packet0
CITY OF
RANCHO Cl1CANK NGA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENM
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
November 17, 1982
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead-
line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting.
The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag
• B. Roll Call: Dahl x, Buquet 6 , Frosty ,
Schlosser- ,and Mikels K.
C. Approval of Minutes:
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Thursday, November 18, 1982, 7:00 p.m. - ETINANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN NEARING, Lions Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line Road.
B. Thursday, December 2, 1982, 7:00 P.M. - ADVISORY
COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center , 9161
Base Line Road
City Council Agenda 2 November 17, 1982
•I. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon
by the Council at one time without discussion.
A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -11 -17 in the
amount of $401,072.95.
B. Forward Claim against the City by Ohio Casualty 3
Group to the city attorney for handling.
C. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mercedes N. and
Stephen I. Elias for on -sale beer and wine eating
place, Mi Casita, 9608 Base Line Road
D. Intent to Order Annexation No. 11 to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 12040
located at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway
and Turner Avenue.
• RESOLUTION NO. 82 -193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT 12040)
r
f
City Council Agenda 3 November 17, 1982
• RESOLUTION NO. 82 -194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:
DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
E. Intention to Vacate a 30 foot service road located
on the south side of Foothill Blvd. in connection
with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investment.
RESOLUTION N0. 82 -195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
• DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE
FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BLVD. IN CONNECTION WITH PARCEL
MAP 6114
F. Approval extention of Improvement Agreement for 20
Tract 9351 located on the west side of Sapphire
north of 19th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -196 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 9351
City Council Agenda 4 November 17, 1982
G. Approval of Parcel Map 7451, Bonds and Agreement 26
located at the southwest corner of Nilson and Haven
Avenues submitted by the Church of the Latter Day
Saints
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -197 27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7451,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
H. Summarily vacate an unused 15 -foot wide drainage
easement located on Parcel Map 5670, northeast 30
corner of 6th Street and Milliken Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -198 32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
• SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A 15
FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I. Award of contract for Carnelian Street Improvements 34
(05- 06 -55) to Fontana Paving, Inc., the lowest
bidder at $144,712,82 - to include asphaltic
concrete (A.G.) overlay and /or reconstruction of
Carnelian Street between 19th Street and Wilson
Avenue and minor A.C. overlaying in Banyan Street,
east of Carnelian Street. Bid is 33% below the
Engineer's estimate of $216,000.
J. Parcel Map 6194, located on the east side of Haven 37
Avenue, south of A.T. A S.F. Railroad tract --
Approval of reduction in bonds from 850,000 to
$20,000.
City Council Agenda 5 November 17, 1982
7
I 1
lJ
K. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion:
1. Tract 9212 - located on the north side of
Banyan, east of Beryl. Owner: Prado Woods
Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $58,000
2. Tract 9240 - located north of Banyan, west of
Hellman. Owner: Prado Woods Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $42,000
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACTS 9212 AND 9240 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK.
L. Approval of Resolution revising and updating
Resolution No. 81 -154.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -154 -A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
NAMING THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BE
ALLOWED TO SIGN SMALL CLAIMS COURT
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO CITY LICENSING
PROGRAMS.
M. Award of contract to the low bidder, All American
Asphalt, for the reconstruction of Sapphire Street
from Rosebud to Vinmar at $46,652.50 plus a 10%
contingency.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
40
41
to be delivered at a
later time
City Council Agenda 6 November 17, 1982
i
ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81- 47
09 (TENTATIVE TRACT 11804 AND 11805) - ALLEN: A
change of zone from R -1 (single family residential)
and R -3 (multiple family residential /planned
development) and the development of 76 condominium
units on 11.03 acres of land at the northwest
corner of Highland and Haven Avenue - APN 201 -262- --
zB, 30, 31, 37, 40
ORDINANCE NO. 186 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 201 -
262 -28, 30, 31, 37, AND 40 LOCATED AT
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND
HAVEN AVENUES FROM R -1 AND R -3 TO R-
3/I
B. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK AND
. RECREATION LAND This amendment to Ordinance No.
105 prepared by the City Attorney's Office reflects
State mandated changes resulting from Senate Bill
1785 authored by Senator Foran.
L
es
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -B (first reading) to be delivered at a
future time
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
PARK AND RECREATION LAND INCLUDING
SAVINGS PROVISIONS.
City Council Agenda 7 November 17, 1982
•V. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. LICENSING OF KENNEL DOGS - Shepherd Ranch Kennel - 84
Joseph Dobson. Staff report by Harry Empey.
B. CREATING OF SENIOR DEPUTY POSITION It is 114
recommended that council approve the creation of
the new position which will give the Sheriff's
Office more flexibility in the assignment of
manpower. Staff report by Capt. Tom Wickum.
C. FEE SURVEY REPORT Council requested item to be
continued to this agenda. However, since the
survey has not been completed, staff requests the
item be continued.
VI. CITY ATTORNEYS REPORTS
*I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. REPORT FROM ADVISORY COMMISSION REGARDING DIRECT
ELECTION OF A MAYOR
B. PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Item continued from the 118
November 3, 1982 city council meeting.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
0
,i
RLARRQ CITY
WARRANT
VC •
pFJCJO{N111LRNL``IAA GN
._ 1111701
Y
AP4
EN N[ DC CMRNGAN A M E MARR
SCOUNT
OA7 F"
RI:FEREACE
'l-
Il
X441
FANCHP - UCAYDNGA J
- IOO r OG0.00
14
MJINF. SB4PCV IC17V$2
]v6.12
Y
11111
v,5
EAPIPN MSIG OPVLPMIa DFP 17/72/412
2.011.51
1.110
611 FY SIGN AYIS 11!01 /!2
.4C
1.1 11
p3cll
P]C5
•CSPRA
_
92.16
iJ
PIGS
II a Iy E.
SCSRCA 11 /01 /E]
92.10
Y
11113
,
Pans
SC56UA ll/Cl /R2
52.10
10314
P±CS
SCSNUA _ -_ _" - 11/01/82 __," _
-
_ _ _ _______
__ _ _._ --
SlRPOA - I1 /01 /PI
92.IC
Y
IOL36
11111
0305
^-+OS
It St3FA 11/01/:2
SCSUV. 1i /01 /zl
92.10
52.IC
10319
FT ^5
Sr SODA II /O1 /P7
sZ. IC
]0)19
Part
SCSSF I1 /Ol /P2
21.10
,,
103.'0
1112(
0291
:475
RA,; 8 A NEdL Il /0I /P2
SIV B!"h CO PROBATION 11103107
18.07
1.00
193??
1 ?00
FARR OF AMFRICA 11/03/F2
.. _ ..
- 9r 776.11 - -
16123
0410
SAN enNC CG ENE Ck U 1/04/4."
41033.57
I'll
THI EHPIEt CO lC /201P2
4r139.ac-
Y
4 "1
1315
CITY RFKTAL 1/OI/P2
93.0[-
1!59}
VC 19
Ffb1.S ALICNM'NT I1 /17/6'
I....
VD10
FORMS ALIGN9FNT '11/17/02
_
VN`ln
FCRNS ALIGNIFNT 11/17/92
Y
16516
6591
VCin
FORMS ALICNNFNT l] /17 /R2
16553
C031
AM INTL- ORUNING OIV -__ "_ 11/17/82 .- - ___
- �- -'� -
-- - - 344.26
1`41
ALTA LENA DIEDT SC LINES 11/17/02
IBS.OL
1`519
1745
ALTA LCRA DIED SCHCCL 11 /l7 /PJ.
F0.8C
Y
16601
0 765
ALTA RNCF"11 GLASS 6 MIRR 11/17/82
141.1'
IF(`3
01:4
OLANEEPI ASSDf. II/I7/22
68.70
I h6D3
1500
C G
L G 11/17/82 -
'"
1x739.50
Y
!6605
1A605
1941
2015
MATERIALS
F.HJ MATERIALS LAB IN 11111/82
CA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS T 11/17/02
850.00
30.00
."
I66114
2115
CITY RENTAL - - -- - 11/17/92
�_
_. 36.57
16607
2335
_.
COCA F.OLI CO - 11 /CI /PS - -"�
- _.. ._ _.. .._
- -- -
... .�.-
I09.PI
166:18
?357
HOLSTENG-
CORN 105 UPHOLSTERY 11/17/82
233.1G
Y
Lh5D9
2372
CORN SIP FN TER PRISES 11/17182
145.70
16611
2478
H P CD VFY .YC 1111 i /F2.
16 8.75
16611
_ _
VENDER NO. 2575 ]1/17182 "
16612
29?9
2515
NGA CO WATER OIS7: 11/17182
4Y
Y
16613
2640
DAHL,
DAILY WALDEN 11/17/92
675.78
675.00
,1p511 -,3650
DAILY RFPCRT ._.....___ 11/17/8.2__.. __.
______�_....
_ _ _ 30.00 -_.-
1nn1R
TE.OT PAC IFIL CHARTER it /,7
644.52
Y
2750
OF /P2
16617
Ihh13
2f97
1300
nOPI IN. JAPFS 11/17/82.
F. HARRY J 11 /I7 /P3
- - " - " -t --
"' "---- "� - - - --
1Y 250 CC
- - 2CO.U0 --
IA619
161.20
40n'?
4.140
FMC Ch PP 11/13/82
FEDERAL "PRESS CORP 11/17/92 -
1.223.63
6.65
Y
1661_1
4095
FILPI. S- BASTIAN II /17 /p2 '
-
2:n00.CC
_ 15622 _
4115
FCNTPNA PAVING INC _ "_.._,__...__11 /11/82 __.
.�
8:037.77 _.
16623
4590
GENERAL FLFCTRiC ]1 /l7 /N2
344.5C
t6A14
4600
G °NFRAL TELEPHONE Cr ]1117/82
11'.70
Y
1A 625
4689
Gn4F?, RICK 11/17/92
2CO.CC
1662.
4375
GIANI JEROV R 11/17187 _
--- ---
- 175.CC _
v
16617
16629
4780
4915
GRAPHICS PRODUCTS CORP 11/17/02
HAINES C CO INC 11/17/82 -
" " -- " "
- -.- -
",
IF Go
141.67 "
Ihfi29
4845
IiERCHENROEDERI NANCY 11/17/82 ;.
'_ -_
77.00
.16630 ..4900
16437
49"15
HOLLEY WILL aM L ._1__ .- .__ 11/17/92_ -. :..:...�
S K HO717 WM R CO 11/17/82 -
REE
_.Y - _
_ _ .....� - -
z73.Da
73.91
I
16M132
51
IDY 11/17/22
1.823.45
16631
16634
75 7S
6185
INTO CITY FIGHT ASSCC 11117182
JOHN SUN. RATION R 11 /17 182
35.CC
II7.CC
16635
KEY PUBLICATIONS 11/17/82
-
29,.00
16636
6680
6620
KUIISFN KERRY 11/17/82
,_
99.00
r
166ai
6625
-
KUHNr NbPY- - 11/11/82
45.00
..16638
11.639 -
6645
6680
LAM JACK - '" 11117182 w„ "- ,�;-
LAW M PRINTING -- - '- _�.�_ -11 /17/82
_
250.02
11.22
,,,-
Y
16640
6866
LOVES POMFR TOOLS 11 117 /02
3.1E
16641
16547
6867
7150
LUDNIG 908 11/17/R2
MAJESTIC TRNPNY CO //I /87
99.00
16[43
7310
I1
MILNE, SHARON 11/17/82 -"
1.411.0[
64.06
16644
7370
MOOERN IRRIGATION 11/17/82
r
7445
N I .�
124.200
]16645
hS'
ppB yp I/�1 tt ]11/17/82
101,71X2'__,
.. _ - 12.2'4! .... -.•
'16647' -'TIf
PAL IFFY[ PRUOUCTSAB. - -___' - ,.�."_.:._.._.^_
__._._. .. __
..
16648
7702
PIERSON. OSCAR 11/17/82
132.00
..
rte.._
v
_ RP67 6771
OF RANCHO CUCD9U4Gq
NA0.RANT
RECONCILIATION ....
11/17/82
V
NARR A
VEN Al V F N D 0 R N A M E
Rp
tsnTE
J 4 pppp11..
phF[RENCE
DISCOUNT NET
:
161•49
77X4 NEC, CONSULTANT 5
11 /17 /P? -
99.76
1790 MINTY P.DVES
M
11/17/97
1(11.]1
l W11
7195 P::VA dISTR1:1 CO
11/17IF2
215.71
11611
IF6 ]
Ia15 PRESS.
[CIS kF5$
11/1713,
5I.47
- _
161.54
RINCH
.9945 RAPIO
11/17/9?
_
104.25
U.6S4
1:175 RAPID LATE INC 7119
DATA
11/11/82
221.11
V
16656
6979 PAULS TIRE REPAIR
11/17/92
16056
1019 RAVACU _ ._
-
11117/92 .. i
__.. _- .__..____
10.50
_ - -� _ - -- -- -- - le
16667
1121 PFYNJLA- JENICF
11/17/12
45.59
16.53
3150 RITT CFSH
11 /I1 /.92
13.59
Y
16659
63Cn SCN, J
CN. JAVCS N
11/17/62
2911.50
16566
SIFFT'6
SINE TY SIR[R IOf. 5'!L
11/ :7 /R'
3:'13.3'3
16/•61
P415
8445 CAN DJNC CC SHERIFFS
11/12/8
23Ir 701.3E
16662
A."40 SAN P9KC CC 31111E k75TF
11/17/,2
32101
Y
16161
B9k0 SAN OIPGU ROTARY
11/17/62
1,344.61
. 16564
- _
. 60 SE VIN DAY 67/70 PARTS
PARTS
.. I1/17/P2
�. __. - - _._
_ -. -. _... 193.05
16565
6599 5VFNn PIKE
11/17/3'2
131.90
If.6e.6
-0111 VE NO. 8630
11 1I7 /D2
Y
1 R.6T
CALIF
61'1 SR CALI -015IN CO
11 /17 /P.?
1:836.44
C•15 SO CALIF GAS
11/171
51.34
...
166!,7
]66f•9
SC
6645 SCI CALIF LANDSCAPE MGNT
11/17/,2
7
10:254.54
Y
16611
0643 SUUTNN CST 1NN1SUTICN GR
II 117 18I
7.00
I, 671
I (572
r661 .STAI CCRT P511PR1Y
4660 STINKYACORP CD
11/17/92
11/17/82_ _..
-_. - -_ .._,- --
34.86
_ _ - . -.. 245.74
___...
166T1
9665 STINKY INC 1NL
11/17/82
443.61
LV
166 T4
166 79
P9 STREET 51187 L M11NT ASS
174745 SULLIVAN, BILL
11/17 /82
I1 /P /R2
30.09
SL.GC
lE*71
17,5 TIRO PACIFIC FIC 01570.18
11 /lT /02
141.62
,
36670
9174 TNRRF7r DAVE
11 /1] /R?
- -
59.00
16676
674 TnkRF2r TINO
11/17/6.2
- 165.00
Y
11719
^790 ROAD TRUCK
11/171E2
57.166
16'. HO
9946 11!11799 INFORMATION SCRV _
U!JITMMINF
- _
_ _ .. _
_. _4444__ -.. 56.16
16.1.91
.013 TUTDO 19. $f H
11117/tl2 4___444__
11/17/92
70.80
16683
THCf
9053 AY. LARD 1NST THE
AND
11117/92
66.I0
r
166,4
WID
5163 VON KpEKFI IIEV�
11/17/82
22.50
16.94
9490 d 9T UR CO
11117162
80.5E
161R5
� 191 TH04ING
VICKUNr TNAINT
- 11/17/6.2 -
- -
19
16636
5935 NIIIIANS PAINTING.
Si'5 D
I1/l7182
4.84
14.84
`
16637
A
9545 Y155LER GVSALN A
11/17/82
250.CC
16634
YUNUN OGEORGEL SERVICE.
11/17/82
_ TU.CC
166,9
__..
q.114
9114 3NNF5r GEORGE
_
11/17182 -
--
_. _.
-- 22.05
169.11
5815 6FRNU0 E5 VICTORIA
11/17/82
2.25
`
16691
9X16 OW IF
11/17/42
12.09
I669P
THRILr
9117 RCK3E
11/17 /82
42.00
SEMIS, DEBRA
DFINALr
` _ -- - -
15.00
-' --
lip
16694
VOID T S
11/17/82
FINAL
TOTALS 401 :072.95
The Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies
• CLAIM DEPARTMENT Sub, 201,3590 Cen1nl A no. P.O. BOX 2WS, Rlymodq California 92506 -Telephone '.7141686 59 11
HOWARD J. FULLER, Claims Manager November 3, 1982
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
RE: Our Insured Thomas Johnson
Our Claim No. : RS 1 AU 82- 867089 W
Place of Loss : 8173 Tapia Via,
Rancho Cucamonga
Gentlemen:
Our above cautioned insured reports to us that a tree
owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga fell on his car
causing damage. The nature and extent of that damage
is documented by the attached estimate of the cost of
repair.
Please be advised that we have paid these damages to
our insured under our automobile insurance coverage.
•
Under the terms of that policy we are subrogated to
our insureds right of recovery for damages caused by
the negligence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the
maintenance of the tree. The purpose of this letter
is to place the city on notice of our interest in this
matter and to seek reimbursement in the amount of the
damages of +750.04, including our insureds $50.00
deductible.
Please forward this payment directly to the West
American Insurance Company , P. 0, Box 2975, Riverside
California 92516.
Very truly yours,
WEST AMERICAN INSUEANCE CO.
Paul B`ussart
Claims Representative
')B /ca
cc: BCD Ted Tntro
• RS
PB
The Op•u Cacucll, Inluhho. COMPanV - Wait Amnion Incunnu Company - Amin-can An 1 Cnucu, C.muan,
The Ohm life Insurance Company • Ohw 5¢ur4, Insurance Company onsets Budget Inc.
rgl w� r rp _ -l-at w •\ -� _ _.. u�.", — ��_'".`�""�ri; � _
:r:l II YAWIN1A IN AVI
Pril All l ll, (.A NI 1(,;!
(714) 986 -5887
(714) 983 -1764 1
u.._e_.r . . n.. u. -. ..-.._...
..
l'os -rov QQQ ..ror.F _ .... . .
OMF
Ts.: o. eoo. ucsr.rc ..r.0 aR.r.�
NXxIInnN RnH 151 Smlm 1Pw LB ,0 7—
nu Ar la III ... R...... n• -
3
p [/ 1
OPtH IlEms (..I) PARTS
MME AM Lme PN AMW M1I PAINT MAT' L —���-
PARIS PRICIi Mud M. Aanenf Cn,xrruf 6 Noe CRAM1CIi wr1xIMII NOIICI
SfTU C "URe, mq Re .ptff lar nol wr1.Jn raY'V REVIAG(0 PARIS
ipenn
Nxq 4, .nx,l 0-11 —1 Rrlmn a hrr, e n orxr n pyu0 .4nr1 ffr'mxf uu.
o..n.ri om.r...o
'
ueoR_�
Pool's usr
_
i : ; �a °1rrm: ll.o.ni'ren..n
V
IWSURANCE DCDUCn BEL MST BE
•mRm.m.nl nl .n'.xpmn r rtrfr b n„ P,% ,nl<'1, 1 p•r moor" .EM n .nnr,l
ua. o Irrw�in.fl. .cctlMt tIM bJVOrMrour iJnl
p'rtl Mw'mA mf "_"d' fop am.e ••ou MMM,nMIMI.R,
PAID BEFORE CAR /EOM.
1
,II
.,.r.... ....
...
E
3
—
I
a
---
1111
10
I
11
r
y
I
2
13
14
Is
ti
9'
- -�
33
—
NXxIInnN RnH 151 Smlm 1Pw LB ,0 7—
nu Ar la III ... R...... n• -
3
p [/ 1
OPtH IlEms (..I) PARTS
MME AM Lme PN AMW M1I PAINT MAT' L —���-
PARIS PRICIi Mud M. Aanenf Cn,xrruf 6 Noe CRAM1CIi wr1xIMII NOIICI
SfTU C "URe, mq Re .ptff lar nol wr1.Jn raY'V REVIAG(0 PARIS
ipenn
Nxq 4, .nx,l 0-11 —1 Rrlmn a hrr, e n orxr n pyu0 .4nr1 ffr'mxf uu.
M Ipn rn.NUrun Mmxuntl pnn ar LM' m mr. nMn 4
l OAR
u..pne1H
a " 'o ' l.mue Mpeutp
All vrf . e
W 'Ir etprure fnur emprprfll
i : ; �a °1rrm: ll.o.ni'ren..n
IMrflu I nV ...... �; aye
IWSURANCE DCDUCn BEL MST BE
•mRm.m.nl nl .n'.xpmn r rtrfr b n„ P,% ,nl<'1, 1 p•r moor" .EM n .nnr,l
SSyREE(EL�{q($J
p'rtl Mw'mA mf "_"d' fop am.e ••ou MMM,nMIMI.R,
PAID BEFORE CAR /EOM.
,II
.,.r.... ....
...
SUBLET NET pN
SALES TAX
EST ItF1E TOTAL -_ _7,sn
Ado. Charges
'`4J]THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ❑AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. 5 822900
yWEST AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. ❑OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE CO. ❑THE OHIO LIFE INSURANCE CO.
nor i 19�.�
-FAY 1
DoLLAPs
.J
0
•
•
•
COPY R.� .»xF_,.,....ITmN..
a N.r w..r. Aw.. rF.a..e -r.,
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICEN5N51
I rYPEl51 OF I:CEN5El51 FlIE rv0.
To OepaNmenI of AI<o4vl:e 8"'"Y C.".1
RECEIPT NO
121505rreer ^ '7
_71 :T'.
$unom<nro. WN 9561, _ __ _ __ __ -
.n '
GEOGRAPHICAL
•u.e.a..nr.e•
CODE
lAr untlxrgned FerebY VPPI•m^br
T: _r IDare
Lcmvn docr.bed ee lone -r
awed•
2, NAMEIS) Of APNICANTIS)
Applied uvdx $e<. 2.0.1
:LZ.tie I![CdAlR A. ^:,:Cn
I fNe <n+e Dare: ERn_ -Doe
_3_t
_
2. TYPES) OF TvAN$ACTIONI$I
IEEE
I TIC,
TYPE
-_
lW!TIAL
r2.43
. IN of N'.,, Cr, il
o1 -Ill -N-bv eM Sue,
.cub OasellDe TAmJ
_—
_ - --
- .- ._.._
Gry ove aP Cede Cou,
?._nC.'.0 _'_)_7.11 ;Ai .:.2'.O.
TOTAL
t:^
6, If P-.- EI<evwd, ). Are P....w. Invde
_ Slew Type of b¢me _ Gry_bm__
S, MaIIVg Add.... 111 d•flertq 0- 51- Namber oM SNen r.Y. r.. ^.
9AIT ... ... ... I been do,iaed of o Woo ;; 10 11 -o You .. Noland ovy of rb. PNY,.. ei rM1e AImFn4<
lnervge Cenrrd Aa a .... 1 al rM1e Denvnrevr Per
nmq to be A<P
11 E,plom a "YES" ...... To eemr 9 e, 10 on vn vne<Fmem wbd .FOIL be deemed FAIL of This eppbmr ev
12 A',,".'I agree, (a rb,t ovy movoger employed .n on wle F <evvd p,-,, ;;I Fa a all rte puel,F<enon a1 0 �<e and
b? rh,, F, wall ,al no lab m muse ar yrmn ro be delnnd v y el rM1e p,. n'e. of lb, PlmM1elrt S.-oq• larval A,.
1l. STATE Of CALIFORNIA C-, of i:ei'u'CiOIARIIYO
npp<PANr "r
1.1 of .1 .»rer.. , .: r» —A. —11..x —1 ,. ... .. M » ,. �., . r .. .. . R.
.
u
SIGN HERE r .••i ✓�
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
5 STATE Of CALIFORNIA Co.., al Dme
.,rv..,, „.•. ......:....... ..... .... o..,. �:.•'.^..: ,.r. .e:Cli'f V.1rv1i N;.TI;:,
re ry vl l o :.vnl p 5ipvarmulp M U.^ _ _ Ib oovTV m.mhrr.Tl
,m.ry ., rteenl
.._.... 11
AY 219tA1•r+IG
L..
191e<ovnn Nu�A�r n,d 5lr..r Cary n,d 7 fod^ r-L,
IL, \.•I 11'rrlr. l(r.l.:n II•Ir (:ne, I �:r ll.......::lrnl l r:. Op'I,
” tAu<nry nno n
.ec.R.a..a4 re. of .el: ra.d aT •.Ln .;etn..vf'lo Oa<. Ll /5 /'ta OIL., W. u..,w.n..e.rurr.aP
0
!0
•
.k
4
nTmv ALA D A Mnvn OTTO A T?nMO A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Intent to Order Annexation No. 11 to Landscape
Maintenance District Nol 1 for Tract No. 12040
located at the northeast corner of Arrow Hwy.
and Turner Ave.
i��C9
1977
Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the
City's intent to annex Tract No. 12040 to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 and setting the public hearing for December 5, 1982.
Also attached for approval is the Engineer's Report for Annexation
No. 11.
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of the public
hearing for December 15, 1982.
Respectfully 1submitted,
LBH:BK :jaa
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. i.
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
AN ASSESS ?TENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, as follows:
SECTIO :1 1. Descriotion of 'dor!k: That the public interest and
convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a
maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and
operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common
greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the
boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2
hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of
any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental
• lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways.
SECTION! 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be
located within roadway right' -or -,way and landscaping easements of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and
more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the
City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance District No.
1 ".
11
SECTION 3. Descriotion of Assessment District: That the
contemplates wort, in the opinion of said City ounci , is o more than local
or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense
of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed
to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as
follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary
lines s'no•an upon that certain "Nap of Annexation No.
11 to Landscape 'daintenance District No. 1"
heretofore approved by the City Council of said City
by Resolution flo. 7D -719, indicating by said boundary
lines the ^xtant of 1!ie territory included within
the proposed as;assment district and ,which map is on
fib; in the orfice of the City Clerk of said City.
L
Resolution No.
Page 2
•
SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by
Resolution No. ' has approved the report of the engineer of work which report
indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary,
assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 11, Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said
City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the
amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work.
SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be
collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are
collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City
Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon
said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments
for the next fiscal year will be determined.
SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that
on December 15, 1982, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at
9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having
any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear
and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said
district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of
Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the
property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify •
the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the
time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be
considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized
assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property
described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by
written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described.
SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work
herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of
the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California.
SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice
shall be made pursuant to Section 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayor
shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and
the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date
set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Reoort, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
I
E
0
RESOLUTION N0. • G.',:i'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAIONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMIiNARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT 12040)
WHEREAS, on November 17, 1932, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report
has been presented to this Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each
and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is
sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be
modified in any respect.
NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucaionua as follows:
• SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and
expenses of saiu ,cork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith,
contained in said report 'be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred
to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land
within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and
confirmed.
SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of
land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be
received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby
preliminarily approved and confirmed.
SEC T IO'I r That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's
Report for t'ne purposes of all suusequent proceedings, and pursuant to the
proposed disCrir_t.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1932.
AYES.
• iIUEiS:
�13SEIT:
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
Engineer's Report for
ANNEXATIO`! NO. 11
to the
Landscape 'Maintenance District No. 1
Tract No. 12040
SECTION 1. Author ity for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to
be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 12040 as well as
on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to
he maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract .'dap as road'aay •
right -cf -pay or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the
developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract
12040. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance
with the Planning Commission.
Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment
diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas, The plans and
specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same
extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No costs vill be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All
improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data,
contract analysis and developed •aorK standards, it is estimated that
maintenance costs for assessment purposes gill equal thirty (;.30) per square
foot per ,ear. These costs lira estimated only, actual assessment will be
based un actual cost data.
•
Engineer's Report Annexation 11
Page 2
The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District ,o. 1
(including Annexation No. 11 comprised of -0- square fe =_t of landscaped area)
is shown below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost
5.30 X 261,346 square feet = $73,403.80
Per Lot Annual Assessment
78,403.80 = 43.09
I?ST t
Per Lot Monthly Assessment
$43.08 = 3.59
12
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the
attached Assessment Diagram. 'Where the development covered by this annexation
involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated
for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active
• homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved
by the District due to said 'homeowner maintenance.
SECTION 5. Assessment Dianram
A copy of the proposed assessment diaoram is attached to this report and
labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated
within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for Annexation No. 11 is found to be of general benefit to all
lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel.
The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1983, to determine
the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during
the 1932/33 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as
required by the Landsrape and Lighting Act of 197 ?.
SECTION 7. Or :1cr ,mants
1. City G;unciI ado Ptr resolution instituting proceedings.
?. City Couicil :rdo Pts Resol,ition of Pr^.Liminary APproval of City Engineer's
Report.
3. City C•,unciI id-lots aesolitinn of Intention to Annex to Oistrict and sets
Public hearing date.
�r
Engineer's Report Annexation 11
?age 3
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
r�
L
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 11
I)IIISIO.N
\'ICINI'FY , . , ,VA I'
1�
I�
Il:lgl
0
_ " \L�N
October 25, 1982
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 -C Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
ATTENTION: Joe Stofa
SUBJECT: Tract #12040
Dear Mr. Stofa:
We, as the Developer of Tract #12040, agree to join the
city -wide Landscaping and Street Lighting District. We
understand credit on the landscaping /maintenance portion
will be given on a city -wide basis, based on an estimate
submitted by the City Engineer.
• Veryy truly yours,
- TCCIZ�(e /- I {;D, GRO
Jos c�p. Oleson
Dirdctor of Forward Planning
•
The Anden Group 629 Covina Boulevard. San Dimas, Cali'orma 91773. Telephone 714 599.686
0
ri
U
0
nrmv nn n � wrn vn nrrn � n�n�rn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer
C, f,
1977
SUBJECT: Intention to Vacate a 30 foot Service located on the
south side of Foothill Blvd. in connection with Parcel
Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investment
As a condition of approval for Tentative Parcel map 6114 and
Director Review 81 -38 for the development of an office complex
(V.I.P. Professional Center) at the southwest corner of Ramona
and Foothill Blvd., has initiated the process to vacate the
frontage road contiguous to the subject property.
The tentative map was approved by the City Engineer on September 30,
1980 and the Director Review 81 -38 was approved by the Planning
Commission at its meeting on January 13, 1982.
The frontage road along Foothill Blvd. exists only in this reach of
the street within the City. It has been found that the frontage
road does not provide for a good and safe traffic circulation,
and it will be appropriate to vacate the road. Some portion of this
frontage road will still remain which may be eliminated in the future
by a City financed project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
setting the date and time of public hearing for the above described
vacation on December 15, 1982 at 7:30 pm.
Respectfullysubmitted,
v L/Bih EB: jaa
Attachments
1/
•
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN CONNECTION WITH
PARCEL MAP NO. 6114
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under
Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the
Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to
vacate the Frontage Road on the south side of Foothill Boulevard a City
street, as shown on Map No. V -024 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a
legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by
reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 15th
day of December, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Community Center
Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time
. and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the
purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present
or prospective street purposes.
SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices
to be pasted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof
proposed to be vacated at least two weeks before the hearing, not more than
300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which
shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following
title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO
VACATE STREET ".
SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations
and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published
10 days before the data set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily
Resort, a ne:ispaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
• NOES:
ABSENT;
1 �
E X H I B I T "A" •
LEGAL FOR 30 FOOT VACATION
The southerly 30 feet of the frontage road as shown as Foothill Blvd.
the outer highway south, lying adjacent to the north line of lots 122
through 125 according to Tract No. 3054 as per recorded in Book 54,
page 14 & 15 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of
California, lying westerly of the northerly prolongation of the west-
erly right -of -line fo Ramona Avenue and 55.00 feet wide as shown on
said map.
Excepting therefrom a triangular shaped parcel of land bounded as
follows:
On the north by the north line of the southerly 30.00 feet of the
Foothill Blvd. outer highway south, as mentioned hereinabove; on the is
east by the northerly prolongation of the west line of Ramona Avenue
as shown on said map; and on the southwest by the arc of a curve to
the southwest and having a radius of 24.00 feet, said curve beinc tan-
gent to both the northbound line and the eastbound line as mentioned
above.
•
r
i
0
M12"MA
0
Q n° OU�
• ml z I li1U)
LLJ
UQ
T T
Q 1 ^ l
R
FOOTHILL
0
�v
VACATION
No. 0 -24
BOULEVARD
1'r- t
It
I
o b
0
b �
N�
122
r
0
�v
VACATION
No. 0 -24
BOULEVARD
1'r- t
It
I
o b
0
b �
N�
0
I
z
W
o=
2
W
•
•
•
i
1t1v nc n A Mrvn rT TO A MnVr.A ire...
Mark III Homes is requesting a one -year extension for the
completion of off -site improvements for Tract No. 9351 This
tract located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of
Banyan Street consists of 63 single family lots and is partially
completed. Attached is a list of the uncompleted items.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution to
extend the Improvement Agreement for Tract 9351 to November 17,
1982 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
AW_X�'
LSH:BK:jaa
Attachments
C>/o
STAFF REPORT
zi'
I
iT
i: CREW
I'>
DATE:
November 17, 1982
ty,
TO:
City Council and City Manager
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY:
Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT:
Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract
9351
located on the west side of Sapphire north of
19th
Street
Mark III Homes is requesting a one -year extension for the
completion of off -site improvements for Tract No. 9351 This
tract located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of
Banyan Street consists of 63 single family lots and is partially
completed. Attached is a list of the uncompleted items.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution to
extend the Improvement Agreement for Tract 9351 to November 17,
1982 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
AW_X�'
LSH:BK:jaa
Attachments
C>/o
RESOLUTION NO. * �; ,:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9351
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement
executed on November 17, 1932 by Mark III Homes as Developer, for the
improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the west side of Sapphire, north
of 19th Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as
9351; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and
• said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C
•
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
'i �
CT TY OF rI MICRO cl_IC MONG'A
•
C'ha rla. J. Itu nuel'Il ^•I Jame. l'. Prn.1
Hirhn,d N. Dahl i'hillih lr. xhl,—,er
October 20, 1962
P_ °'r. 11: Homes
2950 Red 11+_11 Avenue
Costa !.esa, Ca. 92626
Attn: Mr. Jack Tannenbaum
M-r. Tannenbaum:
0, October 19, 1982 a final inspection of the off -site improvements of
Tract 9351 was made. The fcllowing items mustbe eprrected before the
city cr,gineer will grant occupancy on any additional nomes in Tract
9351.
,. Renew the improvement agreement which expired in 1981. Please
• contact Ms. Barbara Krall or this office for details on the renewal
process.
Please be advised that you will remain responsible for maintenance of
all improvements and repair of any damage occuring within the right
o, way until all off -sites are complete and accepted by the City
Council.
2. Construct the two bridal trail access drive approaches on Sapp'nire as
called out on the plans. Please note that the City has adopted new
standards since the plans were approved, and the drive approach
standard has been upgraded from the County standard.
•
Tne City Engineer will require that the two drive approaches on
Sapphire, as well as all new approaches on Celestite, be constructed
"c=ording to City standard drawing number 305 (See attached Standard.
3C�).
heignt of street name signs at Sapphire an! :a rb le and
and Celestita to 8' :rom finis,, ", surface of PerKwap toa
:pwact s See F, �acsei Standard :;402.
street name s1r, app lre and Cr_le�.it=_ ..roc "liar-211�.
.. "- .c._,.. per approve-1 Pla...
(rte C
9.191111.\51 :WSt: ROAD. SUITE C • POST I1FF1('1; 1111% 9e; I ANC110('I'('ANIO\G1. CAI.IFIIIt\1.191i:4n • 194119>94961
III re Tr. 9351
193:
5. Repair fence post holes in V-rble Avenue at Sapphire with a minirue.
of 3" of permanent asphalt concrete.
o. Remove large loop of Edison underground cable protruding from parkway
on Sapphire south of Marble Court.
7. Color coat block wall on Sapphire.
8. Landscape Sapphire parkway per approved plan.
Cordially,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTI -ENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
NO::TE PRESCHER
PUELIC WO.MS ENGINEER
BY: Gave Hleeins
Public Works Inspector
KP:D9:bc
M
•
•
lJ
ter 01
ON,
kt
Noel
qq
is
X 37
W>
16
BANYAN TREET
D
. . .....
ter 01
ON,
kt
Noel
qq
is
X 37
W>
16
•
9G/9=,
;• 1 � 111 /, ) `� <il " \!�
�.) 1 _ ` /ld ).1 .•+ -.,'.n .. ., ':�:.�4� l' a , =fir �� �
Si •:' ul �•• P ,�I, 1 � ii\ � 1• xl ^' ,) Y/, o.. �.4� `� * .q�•,I �,':.I :ITIq .i :I I+ :I9li
It
.. I+ m )i 1O
i�
= 1 .
SAPPHIRE STREEr
•
•
•
rTMV nu• D A AIrUn rT it A AAnMr A
STAFF REPORT-
. xl i
f" U
DATE: November 17, 1982 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7451, Bonds and Agreement
located at the southwest corner of Wilson and Haven
Avenue submitted by the Church of the Latter Day
Saints
The subject map submitted by the Church of the Latter Day Saints
divides 2.79 acres of land into 2 parcels located on the south-
west corner of Wilson and Haven Avenues.
Bonds and an agreement for the construction of the community trail
on Haven Avenue for Parcel No. 1 have been submitted. Construc-
tion of off -site improvements for Parcel No. 1 will be required
prior to building permit issuance for that parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 7451 along with the bonds and agreement and
authorizing the City Clerk and city Engineer to sign same map.
Respectfully submitted,
LBFI: : jaa
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. * ;"
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7451,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7451), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7451, submitted by Church of Latter
Day Saints, Subdivider, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the southwest
corner of Wilson and Haven Avenues, being a division of the east 264 feet of
the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 26, T. 1 N., R. 7 W., San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of San Bernardino was approved by the
Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in
compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7451 is the Final Map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map
offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
. 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf
of said City; and
•
2. That said Parcel Map No. 7451 be and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized
to present same to the County Recorder to be filed
for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
n -�
r.
PROJECT
SITE
CITY OF RANCI 10 U *(,,\%I()N(;,\
PL&7451
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY NIAP Page
i TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7451
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•
TIRE EAST 2N FEET OF THE NORTHEAST W M THE NOPTI4AST 11. OE THE NCP1xV5T P.,
SECTION 26, TI N. N.E W. SS. M. IN 1NE CCVNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO, STATE Of CALIFORNIA.
r
ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL FLAT Of SAID LAND APPROIED AT THE SURVEYOR GENERAL
p1TED NNE E0, 1664 EXCEPTING TNUFfROM THAT PORTION M.1!IIM NiVEN AVENUE
ANO WILSON "ENDS.
DATE: MARCH 4.1982
TRACT NO.
TRACT IN0.9430 M0139: Fi7•Ed I 1,18139/77 -JO
• N.L20000 SINGLE FAMILY - -AV i' -° AVENGING MAP .8 139,11.80
.. -- ---
r� �..P.✓ . ''>
• I OWNER- SVSDIVIDE9
y- CORPOF IN5 PPE$ Cf THE SAN 2E W.V'•:0
\' . r STAKE CFTNE CMIRCHOF.ES'J9 C41, CF LIS
SO E. MATH TEMPLE ST
SALT LANE CITY. UTAH 0400
ENGINEER
_ M[CUTCNAN CO INC
pp 265 N SAN GASATEL %L D
N. ;7 NI.OENA, CAL
NOTES'
10
. j r x0 In"ILT.LA 1.
'^ tJ u tl :iJ �� .P,1T. ;.�+.
y �I ••••'• AAR, .: n.
u n x s
M1 0 1 _ r, i 1 2 ALI wAavIKIAII 1-1 ASE[
• C u ^.iS�T'i0 A li*AA'CV) AK
A '
[! 0 (O I,Ni1 v[
y
INN
„. Z
- - - -� 3 AN , ` _ z
.,
y4y'Y•ytin J :. tLEV I "N2e
.x 84.20000 V A C 4 N T
• •n1 A ; /� I I [ri41 M10 LfxIM4 '
r•'1• ` —• — 1f.51ix. V nMr4!> o.Cffalr V•S
1 _ —AA l.gnV4 SAN..,.
ALI
r ,, i 1 S� [r flrM1e A L AbIV[H
,S ,L .... ALL ru
SMALL CLAIMS COURT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO LICENSING.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
resolve as follows:
In order to comply with the requirements of the municipal small
claims court of the County of San Bernardino, it is necessry to name certain
individuals as those persons authorized to sign court documents as required on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
THEREFORE, the following named individuals are authorized to sign all
necessary court documents relating to licensing:
Sandra D. Hackeny Business License Inspector
Betty M. King Clerk Typist
Harry J. Empey Finance Director
Betty Fryman Director, Chaffey Humane Society
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
lil'I I VI' ItA-Nl;IIV UUUAtnViNUA
MEMORANDUM
C �
Bate: November 12, 1982
To: City Council 1977
From: Finance Oi re c�tor~
Subject: Small Claims Court Signature Designee's
With a change in Personnel it becomes necessary to change
the names of those individuals who have the responsibility of
signing small claims court documents.
With this latest change, we are requesting that Betty
Fryman's name be added to the list for purposes of putting teeth
into their program of enforcement against those refuse to purchase
a dog license. Several thousand dollars have been lost over the
years due to the fact that the Humane Society has not had the
capability of strong enforcement. The small claims court mechanism,
recommend by Sandra Hackney of the Finance Department staff, is being
implemented to assist the Humane Society in recovering fees here
to fore lost. Also, should reduce the pressure on cities to provide
a subsidy to the Humane Society for enforcement activities on behalf
of the cities.
0
•
19
I TMV nT. D A VOT]n (IT in A TRnXTO A
STAFF REPORT
r
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician
19-7
SUBJECT: Summarily Vacation of an unused 15 foot wide drainage
easement located on Parcel Map 5670, northeast corner of
6th Street and Milliken Avenue
O'Donnell, Brigham and Partners has requested that the City vacate
an unused 15 foot drainage easement located on the east property
line of their project, Parcel Map 5760.
Upon field investigation, Staff has determined that this unused
easement is not required. Parcels 1, 2 and 3 on the east side of
Pittsburgh as shown on the attached map have been fully developed
with all drainage flowing toward Pittsburgh Street.
Section 8333 of the Streets and Highway Code states that the City
may summarily vacate (by resolution) an easement if the date of
dedication is less than five years and more than one year, and the
easement has not been used since this date. Since the 15 foot
drainage easement was dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
on March 14, 1980 and has been unused since that time, a summarily
vacation is appropriate.
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
to summarily vacate said 15 foot drainage easement and authorize
the City Clerk to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be
recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
Respectfully submit+ed,
LBH:B .: jaa
Attachments
��J
Parcel Map 5760
RC L 4
!�U RVP L
— - — — — — — — -- — -
PARCEL 2 0
,J I
�, C L
r.
F
Amm
n
LI
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
A 15' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and
Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized
to summarily vacate a 15' wide drainage easement hereinafter more particularly
described; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said
15' wide drainage easement, dedicated over one -year ago has not been used for
its intended purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby makes its order vacating said 15' drainage easement as shown on Map V-
023.
SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded,
said drainage easement no longer constitutes a public utility easement.
• SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
•
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
•
The easterly 15 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Parcel Map 5760 as recorded in
Book 54, pages 53 through 56, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California.
•
•
•
•
nTTV nc v A nTnvn nrTr n ninNTr n
Sealed bids were received November 5, 1982, in the office of the City
Clerk, and were publicly opened and read at 2:00 P.M. Attached is a
summary tabulation of bid proposals received. The Engineering Staff has
analyzed the bids and finds them correct and acceptable.
These improvements include asphaltic concrete (A.C.) overlaying and /or
reconstruction of carnelian Street between 19th Street and Wilson Avenue,
and minor A.C. overlaying in Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street.
The Engineering Staff has selected the firm of Fontana Paving,
Incorporated as the lowest responsible bidder at $144,712.82. This bid
is 33 °s below the Engineer's estimate of $216,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the contract to Fontana Paving,
Incorporated and authorize execution of the contract at the contract
amount plus 10% for contingencies.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:RC:bc
Attachments
_
STAFF REPORT
y
DATE:
November 17, 1982
cy- ` CL I•'.
TO:
City Council and City Manager
1977
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY:
Richard Cots, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract for Carnelian Street Improvements
(05- 06 -55)
Sealed bids were received November 5, 1982, in the office of the City
Clerk, and were publicly opened and read at 2:00 P.M. Attached is a
summary tabulation of bid proposals received. The Engineering Staff has
analyzed the bids and finds them correct and acceptable.
These improvements include asphaltic concrete (A.C.) overlaying and /or
reconstruction of carnelian Street between 19th Street and Wilson Avenue,
and minor A.C. overlaying in Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street.
The Engineering Staff has selected the firm of Fontana Paving,
Incorporated as the lowest responsible bidder at $144,712.82. This bid
is 33 °s below the Engineer's estimate of $216,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the contract to Fontana Paving,
Incorporated and authorize execution of the contract at the contract
amount plus 10% for contingencies.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:RC:bc
Attachments
-Corrected Bid Amounts
A.i ^$i
•
&UCAMONGA
•
y
CITY OF RAN
SUMIARI OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT: Ornellan Street
Improvements
DATE:
Navemeer 5, 1992
LOCATION: Carnelian
Street, between Highland
and Nilson Avenues
CONTRACT NO. 05 -06 -55
Fontana
Pay. Inc.
Blair Is, Inc.
Su11T- Miller Con,
E.L.
Yeager
All A- er!enn
Arpht
D t ; rrf
re
P.O. Box 847
17300 Marna St
P.O. Box 432
P.O.
Rex 87
932 T-a
A CutrF
P. ^. ,e
17 -.
Fantan.,92335
Ymrb. Linda 92686
Orange
92666
Riverside 92502
Orange 92668
G1,A,a
91710
ITEM
OUANTITIM
BID
AMOUNT
BID AMOUNT
BID
AMOUNT
Bra
AMOUNT
BID
Af 17`
BID,
AV ^MT
1
C1e.ring,Grnbbin8 6 Pam.
Lump Sum 12,500
12,500.OD
3,600 3,800.00
4,900
4,900.00
5300
5.300.00
13,850
13.850.OD
3,250
3,TA.p9
2
A.C. Pav!.,
4664 Tons
21.50
/00,276.00
23.60 110,070.40
24.40
113,801.60
23.00
107,272.00
24.00
111,916.00
26.)7
3
Raise Sew.Huhl.to Ord.
3 Each
200.00
600.00
250.00 750.00
215.00
645.00
250.00
750.00
200.00
600.00
P25.OD
lF r0
4
Raise Ntr Valv.ta Ord.
9 Each
45.00
405.00
35.00 315.00
65.00
585.00
25.00
225.00
20.00
189.50
85.00
76SCO
5
Cold Plane -5' Mi.. Nld.
8314 L.F.
0.47
3,907.58
0.50 4,157.00
0.51
4,240.14
0.50
4,157.00
0.50
4,14.00
0. =0
-,'57.00
6
A.C. Pavement Removal
23,870 S.P.
0.46
10,980.20
0.26 6,206.20
0.30
7,161.00
0.50
11,935.00
0.15
3,5Pa.ro
_._.
7
Petromat, Pvm.reinf.fab.
14733 S.Y.
0.60
01839.80
0.80 11,786.40
1,10
16,206.30
1.15
16,942.95
9.90
8
C.A.B. /C.S.B. /Class 11
579 Ten.
7.00
4,D53.00
7.50 4,342.50
6.75
3.908.25
11.00
6,369.00
13.00
7,5:7.00
S.i °D
3.144 '0
9
P.C.C. Pavement Removal
100 S.P.
5.00
500.00
1.00 100.00
3.00
300.00
1.00
10000
5.00
500.00
4.00
400X0
10
12" P.C.C. Care L Cutter
210 L.P.
10.64
2,234.40
13.00 2,730.00
13.00
2,730.00
1D.00
2,100.00
10.00
2,100.00
8.90
1,Tac,rO
11
P.C.C. Drive Approach
112 S.F.
1.12
125.44
4.00 448.00
2.15
240.80
3.0
336.00
7X0
184.00
3.25
364 S0
(
12
Cold Plane Tr ... ver..
620 S.F.
0.47
291.4D
0.40 248.00
0.44
272.60
0.40
248.00
3.00
1860.00
C.49
297.60
1
Mum,.
`
144,712.82
144,95350
154,990.89
155,734.95
15 ^,860.00
159,194.27
-Corrected Bid Amounts
A.i ^$i
a.. • •
•
Rivera fee Conat
I11 Y id $treat
Riverside, 92502
I -S QUANTITIES DID AMOUNT
1 C1a.1tr9,Gtubbin8 A Rea. i.oap Sum 14,000 14.00D.00
2 A.C. Fsva.B 4064 Tana 24.00 111,936.00
3 NaiCe. Bam!hi0l .to Crd. 3 Eaoh 250.D0 750.00
4 Fu^e zt- '.'1!v.to Gre. 9 hch 55.00 495.0
5 Cold wW. 8314 L.P. 0.46 3.824.44
6 A.C. Ive,eut P•x ail 23,870 S.F. 0.45 10,741_50
7 Petr ... t, Pvm.reiaLTab. 14733 S.Y. 1.05 15,469.65
B C,A.B.AO.S.S. /Clvs it 579 Tons 10.00 5,790.00
9 P.C.C. Pavenent Prmoval 100 S.F. 1.75 475.00
10 R" P.C.C. Curb A Gutter 210 L.P. 9.0 1,890.0
11 P.C.C. Drive Approach 112 S.F. 2.00 224.00
12 Cole Ph -e Trarraverse 620 S.F. 2.00 1,240.00
Munro
_ar,oted Bid Amount.
A
G�-
PcMrl. F.cn: ^.•arc IAKID La ire Con -tr.
3b 13 Foothill Plva. P.O. flax 381 4661 Arrow Owy
La Crcrents 91214 ELtwand. 91739 Montclair 91T53
BID AMOUNT BID A6IOUIII BID AMOUNT
6,000 6,000.00 2,370 2,370.00 1,850 1,850.00
24,03 112,075.92 27.40 127,793.60 29.40 737,121.60
285.00 855.00 400.00 1,200.00 250.00 750.00
20.00 180.00 150.OD 1,350.00 60.00 540.00
0.50 4,157.00 0.54 4,489.56 0.52 4,323.28
0.58 13,844.60 0.33 7,877.10 0.39 9,309.30
1.43 21,068.19 1.08 15,911.64 1.30 19,152.90
14.91 8,632.89 16.90 9,785.10 11.15 6,455.85
1.Op 100.00 2.23 223.00 1.10 110.00
10.00 2,100.0 13.70 2,877.00 12.00 2,520.00
3.00 336.00 4,12 461.44 3.60 403.20
0.45 2'19.00 0.46 285.20 0.45 279.00
Nil lct, Lnrp.
Colton 92324
BID AMIUIIT
4,500 111500.CC
26.00 121,264,CC
285.00 855.00
25.00 225.00
0.50 4,157.00
0.50 11,935.00
2.00 29,466.00
11.20 6,484.80
1.00 100.00
11.00 2,310.00
3.00 336.00
2.00 1240.00
166,535.59 169,628.60 173,623.64 182,815.13 182,872.80
(174,623.64)-
a
N
nTmv nT. n A Xln`Un PT Tn A A /nwrn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
2 ! yC
197
SUBJECT: Reduction in bond amounts from $850,000 to $20,000
for Parcel Map 6194, located on the east side of Haven
Avenue, south of A.T. & S.F. Railroad Track (Bond No.
5796436)
The Caldwell Company has requested a reduction in the bond amount
for the off -site construction for the above referenced project.
Off-site improvements except for those to be completed with the
Assessment District and a retention basin have been completed.
The agreement and a bond for $20,000 to cover the cost of the
construction on the retention basin will be held until construction
is complete.
It is recommended that City Council approve the reduction of the
bond (RS796436) to $20,000 for Parcel Map 6194 submitted by Cadillac
Fairview /California.
Resp5ctfully sub
LBH:B .jaa
Attachment
1 �
�J /
- III -I' --
IIIt11 I I�r� •or a —[e. ri 1' tot *F
-'
___ _— tot _aor H / U -
.�
�:i ?ii ��— �I �.. .. \ -'- I" aor �' a., 1. .i a'�-i :ter 1 •\ 'Si_ .....,'.__.._......... -m
ter u � J 1111 • »�
it
I tm 1 } lnt r ' tnt s te+ . i aar r ie+� ter
_ 11
II I I
1A4ib'et `E FGIIVnL N:.F r..N[o A: -`'
F
I --
u
_.l
IEl_Iti.: {tea. -�t
_ _
_
.......... mw.r... caca :<.... ...... -. .. ,..e - a. a.�w ....,...o, ..o .. -».n. a....... -..a. ..........
f+ J
►-1
I
1
Y'll
October 27, 1982
Y Go
Mr. Paul ROgeau
Assistant Civil Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Parcel Map #6194
Dear Paul:
Pursuant to our previous discussion, I am anxious to determine
what further is necessary to exonerate our improvement bonds
currently being held by the City.
With the Assessment District now finalized, the only uncompleted
item to my knowledge was the retention basin which, of course,
now will no longer be required.
As our bonds expire November 6, we would prefer not to renew
them and incur additional expense. Therefore, your assistance
in getting them exonerated would be appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
RANCHO HAVEN ASSOCIATES
7 1
Charles R. Caldwell
CPC: wk
1451 OUAIL STREET, SUITE 212, NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 11714) 8516651
L
0
f4T V nc n A vrun rT Tc A artnnlc A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager ,,� ^{
FROM.: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer,)'
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
Tract No. 9212 - located on the north side of Banyan, east of
Beryl
OWNER: Prado Woods Corp.
1156 N. Tustin Ave.
Orange, CA 92667
Faithful Performance (Road)
$58,000
Tract No. 9240 - located north of Banyan, west
of Hellman
OWNER: Prado Woods Corp.
1156 N. Tustin Ave.
Orange, CA 92667
Faithful Performance (Road)
$42,000
` c F
1977
The road improvements for the above referenced tracts have been
constructed in accordance with approved plans and it is recommended that
City Council accept said improvements, release the faithful performance
bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
RESOLUTION NO. a
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FUBLIC TMSROVEME:T -S
FOP. TRACTS 9212 AND 9200 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF ,.
NOTICE 02 COMPLETION FOR THE 'WORK
v;HEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 9212 and
.240 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17 day of November, 1982.
AYES:
`TOES: i
ABSENT: +
•
ATTEST:
Lauren ?1. 'Wasserman, City Clerk
.•
.ion 0. Mike's, Mayor
,`-j_ 1
k,
y
4
_ya
6.
d_
i
scoaa;::G :.Face; a s::
CM OF RARCHO CCCAXO1:C2
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamoinga, Califarnia
9130
Wnt RECORDED `TAIL TO:
CITY CLEER
CITf of Ave :C110 CPC ?- 10INGw
Post Office sou-807
Nancho Ccca.:anaae California
91730
NOTICE OF CMTUTION
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVLU THAT:
1. The undersigned is an Amer of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real pronertye the nature of whica
interest or estate is:
Tract No. 9212
2. The full name and address of the undersigned Owner is:
CITY OF RhrtCEO COCRHORGA, 9320 -C baseline Need, Post Office Sc::
807, Manche Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 17th day of November 1582, there was r_m-
plated on the hereinafter described real proper VI the work of im-
provement at forth in the contract documents for
Tract No. 9212
1. The name of the original contractor for the work of in-
provement as a whole was Prado Woods Corp.
5. The real pro2ertY referred to herein is situated 1. the
City of Rancho Cucamngat County of San Bernardino, California,
and is described as follows:
Tract No. 9212
The street nddr.•as Of sail property Is: N/A
O:. Ti:J: 17
CITY 07 P,%W:IO CCC:L: ACNIA, a
-;:n is tool v :•; :n :'1t10n� C1: n•!r
Z t:. -el
t•ri -1 y
3
.1_ ;•t %a
ru
INN
scoaa;::G :.Face; a s::
CM OF RARCHO CCCAXO1:C2
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamoinga, Califarnia
9130
Wnt RECORDED `TAIL TO:
CITY CLEER
CITf of Ave :C110 CPC ?- 10INGw
Post Office sou-807
Nancho Ccca.:anaae California
91730
NOTICE OF CMTUTION
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVLU THAT:
1. The undersigned is an Amer of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real pronertye the nature of whica
interest or estate is:
Tract No. 9212
2. The full name and address of the undersigned Owner is:
CITY OF RhrtCEO COCRHORGA, 9320 -C baseline Need, Post Office Sc::
807, Manche Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 17th day of November 1582, there was r_m-
plated on the hereinafter described real proper VI the work of im-
provement at forth in the contract documents for
Tract No. 9212
1. The name of the original contractor for the work of in-
provement as a whole was Prado Woods Corp.
5. The real pro2ertY referred to herein is situated 1. the
City of Rancho Cucamngat County of San Bernardino, California,
and is described as follows:
Tract No. 9212
The street nddr.•as Of sail property Is: N/A
O:. Ti:J: 17
CITY 07 P,%W:IO CCC:L: ACNIA, a
-;:n is tool v :•; :n :'1t10n� C1: n•!r
Z t:. -el
t•ri -1 y
3
.1_ ;•t %a
ru
RECG:.J=
0
CI -'i OF RnNCNO CL'CA::ONGd
Pea Office Box 807
Rancho Cmcamcaca. Ca lif ;:n is
91739
NBEN FECOROEO )L \Ti TO
CITY CLEPt
G:T? C. P.S.'Uo CL'C.+BO::GA
Post Office Bo.-807
P.ancho Cucacoo. -a, Cal Lodi'
91730
NOTICE OF COMPLCTIC.;
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TP. T:
1. The undersianed is an owner of an interest or ea-at:
in the hereinafter described teal property, the net-re of
interest or estate is:
Tract 9240
2. TSe full name and address of the underai -hed cwnar is:
CITY CF R-NCBO CUV*:OSGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office E
807, Ranch- C- camonea, California 91730, •
3. Oa the 17th day of Novefter , 1582, there was c-
Plated on th3 hereinafter described real property the wor,a cc ,,;
provement set forth in the contract documents for
Tract 9240
4. The name of the original contractor for the wer% c. im-
provement as a whole was Prado Ndods Corp.
5. The real property referred to hareir. is situated
City of Rancho Cuc,unonna, County of San Bernardino, California, `
an; is dcscribed as follows:
Tract 9240
The :tr.,gt xhi: ,rss of said propert is: N/A
ukfi:a: In .
,m :e I!, r •e7nra t:�n, '_..n ..
B'i : •
E
•
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November ti, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Harry R. Lanham, Public Works Inspector
GCG,lIpt,
�110, Of
Y V I'I>
SUBJECT: Sapphire Improvement from Rosebud to Vinmar and
Amethyst Cross Gutter at Base Line
197,1
Sealed bids were received November 9, 1982, in the office of
the City Clerk and were publicly opened and read. Attached
is a summary tabulation of bid proposals received from ten
contractors. The Engineering Staff has analyzed the bids
and finds them correct and acceptable.
The Engineering Staff recommends award to All American
Aspahlt as the lowest resposible bidder at forty six
thousand, six hundred and fifty two dollars and fifty cents
($46,652.50). This bid is 28% below the Engineer's estimate
at $65,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the contract to
All Amercian Aspahlt and authorize execution of the contract
at the contract amount plus 10% contingency.
Respectfully submitted,
LB�.)iRL:bc
Attachments
E •CITT911ANCIO CUCAMDIIM
^I: ?IAHY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PYJr'F.CT: Sapphire Improvements u /Amethyrt Cro::e Gutter at Dane Line
LOCAf:.'t:: 50:,4,,:1 to Vinmar
ITE'5
1 Clearing •nJ Grubbing
A.C.
3 P.C.C. Sidewalk
4 A.C. Paving
5 P.C.C. Drive APprnanh
6 A.C. Bern
7 Raising water Valve
8 C.A.B. /LS.B. /Cis ss II
9 P.C.C. Cross :utter
10 Relocate Sign
U�
All Aner3can
OOA!iTITIES BID AMOUNT
Luwp Sum 6,500.00
2500D S.F. 0.25 6,250.00
40 S.F_ 2.65 106.00
1000 Sam 23.85 23,850.00
100 S.F. 3.95 395.00
1160 L.F. 2.40 2,784.00
1 Each 5D.00 50.00
650 Tons 6.95 4,517.50
400 S.F. 5.25 2,100.00
1 Each 100.00 PGD.DO
46,652.50
D/k Paving E. L. Teager
BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT
3,400.00 5,000.00
0.20 5,D00.00 0.20 5,000.00
2.50 100.00 2.00 80.00
28.00 28,000.00 25.00 25,D00.00
2.50 250.00 3.00 300.00
2.90 3,364.00 3.00 3.480.00
75.00 75.00 25.00 25.00
6.50 5,525.00 10.00 6,500.00
4.00 1,600.00 5.00 2,000.00
50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00
DATE: liavemher 9, 1?32
ACCOUNT 110. 43 -20 -66
Sully Miller Fontana Parinr Riverside Conet.
BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT RID AMOUNT
9,000.00 7,390.00 5,000.00
0.17 4,250.00 D.31 7,750.00 0.34 8,500.00
9.35 374.00 3.12 124.80 2.00 80.00
26.80 26,800.00 24.65 24,650,00 29.00 29,000.90
5.50 550.00 4.27 427.00 7.00 700.00
2.25 2,610.00 2.14 2,482.40 2.40 2,784.00
80.00 80.00 75.00 75.00 85.00 85.00
6.550 4,225.00 8.45 5,492.50 9.50 6,175.00
3.85 1,540.00 5.17 2,466.00 4.30 1,720.00
110.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 85.00 85.00
47,364.00 47,485.00 49,539.00 50,959.70 54,129.00
f
f �
IT! ":1: QUANTITIES
1 Cl-ri, pa...ru,bir, Lurp Sum
2 A.C. 25000 S.F.
3 P.C.C. Si.Fxa14 40 S.F.
4 A.C. Paving 1000 Tona
5 P.C.C. Drive Approach 10D S.F.
6 A.C. Berm 1160 L.P.
7 Raieteg Water valve 1 Each
8 II 650 Ton.
9 P.C.C. Crov Cutter 400 S.P.
m Relocate 31'. 1 Bach
Robert Eseudero D. 6 D. Aaph -lt B.O. Mheatly laird Conatr
BID
0.34
4.00
28.07
3.45
2.75
25.00
11.57
4.35
100.00
A43UIIT
5,000.00
8,500.00
160.00
28,070.00
345.00
3,190.00
25.00
7.520.50
1,740.00
100.00
BID AMOUNT
13,000.00
0.15 3,750.00
5.00 200.00
32.00 32,000.00
4.00 400.00
3.50 4,060.00
250.00 250.00
7.00 4,550.00
3.25 1,300.00
300.00 300.00
BID
0.18
5.50
42.00
5.50
3.00
60.00
10.00
4.25
60.00
AMOUNT BID AMOUNT
3.550.00 4,100.o(
4.500.00 D.28 7,000.0(
220.00 11.70 468,0(
42.000.00 38.9D 36,900.0(
550.00 8.75 675.0(
3,460.10 3.50 4,060.M
60.00 70,00 MIN
6,500.00 11.70 7,605.M
1,700.00 5.25 2,100.0(
60.00 234.00 234.01
54,650.50 59,610.OD 62,620.00 65,412.Oo
• •
ra, ,_
I
0
CJ
E
n 1 vnTTn i.,,n l "I'll, n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 17, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager 197
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -09
TENTATIVE TRACTS 11804 & 11805 - ALLEN - A change of
zone from R -1 Single Family Residential) and R -3
(Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family
Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 76
condominium units on 11.03 acres of land located at the
northwest corner of Highland and Haven Avenues - APN
201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 37 & 40.
SUMMARY: This proposal is for a planned residential development
consisting of 76 condominium units on 11.03 acres of land, in
conjunction with a zone change from R -1 and R -3 to R -3 /PD and the
issuance of a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission, at its
meeting of October 13, 1982, held a duly advertised public hearing to
consider the above - described project and approved the related tract maps
with conditions, as attached, and recommended approval of the Negative
Declaration and zone change. Please find attached a copy of the
Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes which fully describe the
project.
The proposed project is consistent with all related City ordinances and
plans. The proposed overall density of 6.9 dwelling units per acre is
consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density
Residential (4 -14 du /ac). No adverse environmental impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
CORRESPONDENCE: At the Planning Commission public hearing, two
residents from the adjacent Garden Apartments expressed concern with the
amount of traffic generated by this project, adequate screening between
the two projects, and preservation of existing Eucalyptus, as indicated
in the attached Minutes. This item was advertised as a public hearing
and notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the
project site. Included in the Planning Commission Staff Report is a
letter from the Garden Apartments Homeowners' Association Board of
Directors supporting the project.
Planned Development 81- 09 /TTs 11804 & 11805
City Council Agenda
November 17, 1982
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City •
Council approve Planned Development 81 -09 for the above- described
project through adoption of attached Ordinance and issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
lly submitted,
tanner
:DC:jr
ts: Planning Commission Staff Report & Resolution of Approval
Minutes of October 13, 1982 Planning Commission Meeting
City Council Ordinance
•
1.
•
I-1
U
s� C
,..m.,
STAFF REPORT
Ins'"
DATE: October 13, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -09 (TENTATIVE TRACTS 11804 and
11805 ) - ALLEN A total planned development of 76
condominium units on 11.03 acres of land in the R -3 and R -1
zones located at the northwest corner of Highland and Haven
Avenues - APN 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 37, 40.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting approval of a
planned development consisting of two (2) tentative tract maps in the R -1
and P. -3 zones (R -3 /PD pending), located at the northwest corner of
Highland and Haven Avenues (Exhibit "A "). The property presently contains
several structures which will be removed and existing mature vegetation
which will be preserved wherever possible. Other than these structures,
the project site is vacant with a 5% to 6% slope from north to south, as
shown on the Natural Features Map (Exhibit "I "). The project site is
bounded on the west by an existing single family tract and on the north by
the Garden Apartments complex.
ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth
Management, and Grading Committees. All the issues and concerns of these
committees are reflected on the attached tentative tract map
(Exhibit "B "), development plans, and recommended Conditions of
Approval. The project will be bisected by Alta Loma Avenue. Alta Loma
Avenue will be a temporary cul -de -sac until it can be connected to the
existing Alta Loma Avenue. Alta Loma Avenue will function as a frontage
road when the Foothill Freeway is completed.
The Applicant has worked with the Garden Apartments Homeowners'
Association to redesign the Haven Avenue entrance to the Garden
Apartments. The proposed Site Plan would elminate the existing access
road from Alta Loma Avenue. The Grading Plan, Exhibit "G ", has been
designed to maintain the natural contours as much as possible and to
provide appropriate drainage structures to accept and divert water. The
buildings have been designed with staggered pad elevations to further
minimize the need for extensive grading.
ITEM F
0
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Committee has worked with the Applicant in
resolving concerns relative to the Site Plan, recreational space, and
architectural elevations. The Committee was concerned with the
Applicant's original proposal, which indicated future construction an
Phase III which lies within proposed Foothill Freeway right -of -way. The
Applicant has agreed not to propose construction for this portion. The
proposed Tentative Tract Map 11805 will make this portion a separate lot
to facilitate purchase by the State for freeway right -of -way purposes.
Therefore, the Design Review Committee recommends approval of this
project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the
Applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of
the Initial Study and found that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING: The subdivision maps have been prepared in accordance
with its y standards and policies, and the project site is suitable for the
proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. •
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in The Daily
Report newspaper and approximately 41 public hearing notices were sent to
property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Attached is a letter
of conceptual approval from the Garden Apartments Homeowners' Association
Board of Directors. No further correspondence has been received either
for or against this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a
public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If
after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and
Conditions of Approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution and
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
ResIlectfully submitted,
/ 1
Y �/C
RICK C, MEZ
City Planner
RG:DC:jr
i
0
•
L
L
l t
PD 81- 09 /TTS 11804 & 11805
Planning Commission Agenda
October 13, 1982
Page 3
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map and Phasing Plan
Exhibit "B" - Subdivison Maps
Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape
Exhibit "E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "H" - Haven Avenue Streetscape
Exhibit "I" - Natural Features Map
Initial Study, Part I
Letter from Garden Apartments Homeowners' Association
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
" f�
U
117
-LEMON -AAML,
N-Y >
HIGHLAND AND HAVEN,;
CONDOMINIUMS, GARDEN CON 9 i5l-,
7
GHLAN
LLI Z:]M'
ul
fi
•
V v
NoRTI I
CITY ( )II,
R: 1 \('I 10 c Uc'. \;ICA.
— L--i /THAS46t
PLANNING DIVISION 1: N 111 1IT7,A—scm.t — •
—e'er
LOT I ;\
x ...M+ L� ! � t���11 i , l -• �� I! ".'i y I Sv+F,'tl
- tc t--- 'r J f f11 +r
I _14Z
_
r
r
_ I _
m
N )RTII
CITY OF ITINIt
- • R:1 \CI X C't:C'.1 \ 1O.\(..1 TITI,I,: _
PL. \N\I\G DID ISION ILCI11116 SCALE:
'� r�i
VY yl _...II..cJ a.pj4�
Phase 1)
Phase, 2)
Phase 3)
phase
�>S
9
N a_ V.
.t
yt, f to
\'(1RTI I
CITY OF a+t{,���
PPLANNING UI \'ISIO� 1[VIII;Ir'- L./-- SC. \IT �
4 ..
\'(1RTI I
CITY OF a+t{,���
PPLANNING UI \'ISIO� 1[VIII;Ir'- L./-- SC. \IT �
• e� +s1Y�y'rn -
.: yA •.t 1 i 1. i J y.. ^ .4 8 ..t � .ta .s .t .z
y -P CJ's
- --
�,..a .�.t. .!�.y.ANJ uo AVE ........a �.n>
V 1
noun l
CITY OF
RANCI O CUCANIU \G.1 TITLE: e4N4- C2P t,E L_L KQWAK
DIVISION f.Nrllrrf t2__sAIJ: .
J —
•
5 —Css�v-� —nA
KeAr,
T3�
Ff'4n47
NORTI I
CITY OF US050
11 1 VNCI 10 CUCII VN ION'(7" VAM IOALS--
PLANNING DIVISION �A
0
T M
VulLz--)WC,j it art
CITY OF
it I \.\('I 10 Ct "('. V% KAG,
PLANNING DIVISION
111,7
1020'
lloo'.
1325 1270"
wkw
TITITI;
lll,,\NNIN(; DIVISION
V-
Arl
0
•
•
I I
Li
J
-k/
- -N
CITY OF
RAM IK)CUCANIONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
M)RTI I
1-mm
TIITF-
I:NllllllI':
Now 7
.
7 rl
\olm I
CITY OF 1N 1:1.r- � oN
lt. \\CIiO CUU, VN 10. "G,
PLANNING DIVISION
A-A
•
\olm I
CITY OF 1N 1:1.r- � oN
lt. \\CIiO CUU, VN 10. "G,
PLANNING DIVISION
0
-7
0
CITY OF T
• RANCI K ) CUCA'N lo\(;,\
PLANNING DIVISION 'r SCALF
-W I
bl
C r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I —.PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Reviev
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
envirorsnertal impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.-
PROJECT TITLE: Hiehland & Haven Garden Condominiums
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The Allen Develonnent
Comnanv. (Peter B. Allen General Partner) P.O. Box 630
Sun Vallgy, Idaho 83353 (208) 726 -3317
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _
Alan Snapo. Architect 6799 Narlrthur Rlyci NPwp n Reach\
714 833 -3560 92660
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
-H.W. corner (11 acres) - Highland and Haven Avenues
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDCRAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PER:41TS:
Pos ^'hle coordination with C17TRANS re; freewav to south and
or re -aU ,nod !'i,hland frontage road
Y -1
11 �,
I 1
rJ
•
L
`J
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
I
HI'I.Y -kt-1 Tfii'Ti�T.7�� g�
c �• •a Ir r1�T�i*swa*aF�TFt�TEI�1
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: project gross area - 469 417
Sn Ft / xis sng deterioratpd buildings 2000 Sq ,Ft /new
development building area - 96.000 Sp F i
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
The dominant feature to the north is the existing Garden a r-
ment complex. which is hidden under a dense forest of Euca-
1,vptis and marVrp r f 11hirh arp nn thp nrnp e
devpinnm r 'r d will of rourqp h 1 fr M nor views _
•
obviousl;z Mt Raldy to the north and formal t re s and
fic1,1� r- rl- ....a .. —.
natural grpqr pq arp pre prpqpnt on the 'r 11 aa the parse
remains of o f fruit orrharri -A—new ho ing tract is
iocated to the wgs t. whose questionable aethetics are no com-
element to any new development on the subiect site No sie
nificanr animas life or x ^o d narry natural forms are in
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
The mcw prnnngn1 ..'11 2tter.ot to tie stronrlv with the eristine
Carden tv-+r m n •• r' by cr;g d mn r nr 'ahnl p" which
aesthetically will have more impact than either part. The
positive result of such a compatablity of 'landscape and form
• will be a benefit to the entire community.
I- 2
WILL THIS PROJ..CT:
YES NO
_B_,. 1. Create a substantial change in ground •
contours?
_.ls_.. 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
*_X_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.) !
X_ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
v_ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 4u1
g, 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: *All services will need
to he increased to some extent but exi tnz approved
•
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe<
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee. /; C
Date_ 12/31!80 Signature
Alan Snapp, Arcnit [ •
Title n.+nreactLiog Men
Development Company
Z9
�- C
RESIDENTIAL CONSTROCfION
• The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucaoon
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Allen Development Company
Specific Location of Project:N 14 corner 11 acres HigIIIAnrl x tt-
PHASE I PHASE 2 PRASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number multiple
family units:
units:
Qn .
Ila
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
2
$2
•
T
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model 4
and 4 of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Price Rance
2 - Be room "Stacked" $75.0 00
(1st floor)
3 - Be room "S 'a k - $85.o 0
(2nd floor)
3 - Be. room To�,mhouse - 5100.000
(2 -story unit)
•
T -4
10, 1092
Mr. P,t trr Al l,rn
Allen U;•re•lomlrnt !1ornxt n�,
11.0, Box 610
Sun Y;411er, lelalto 81111
Dear Mr. anon=
1t Litt, w.,. tin.: or I,In• i;, rr,i of Ili reomr' of thr• G, 1.1!..1.
on Tlnlra, lay an•!m.,t 'eth, 1022, y,mr pre.nne:t1 for the eloe••I��I!�nrr.!
of Me proprrlire+ In lho south r:nd oa: L of the .lrrnniat.i• +n
prep,rt5 11:18 7irl•n anprot:11 in nrin ^ittt.e.
While- tiro Urfioer:+ of Iha A. ,orf:t! i m wtr.... Ill -,I rnetr
prom: =.i
is a r,•n;vnalll:• one^ !•nr :tll ltu•ti •• ;, any r!.rei an!1r,• '
I- =n4•jt•et In nrielrn ::;:pra:a by :e Im, thet•d:+ ml.jority .ir t11r•
Ilrnmr•.twn••rs within the A- P,wia'tino„
The. hoard of Uirrrlor= is nut t•tr mworr•el to ,..^ant, filr:l :tn,rocnl•
'Tr anpr •n i:e l:• gone• :;r,•Inl I'or "I:r inlorerl.. in :1••t •1•,11 ciq
r;mr nI -ws., :m-1 + !rill 1v: n1•n.,n,1 to .•nn t'inne to m., rf< !1!+ c'n
in firili /imt t,h^ irom gal.
For j!p. Ilonr,l nr ilir•;•1•tr.-
U .... ...... fill it'
,
.:.: .., I ;I r
rt.
Railb
y
s,
v.
;»
x,
THE GARDEN APARTMENTS
`.
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
tHCaurattwt[o •
0700 HAVEN AVEMIE
ALTA UNAA. CA. 91701
10, 1092
Mr. P,t trr Al l,rn
Allen U;•re•lomlrnt !1ornxt n�,
11.0, Box 610
Sun Y;411er, lelalto 81111
Dear Mr. anon=
1t Litt, w.,. tin.: or I,In• i;, rr,i of Ili reomr' of thr• G, 1.1!..1.
on Tlnlra, lay an•!m.,t 'eth, 1022, y,mr pre.nne:t1 for the eloe••I��I!�nrr.!
of Me proprrlire+ In lho south r:nd oa: L of the .lrrnniat.i• +n
prep,rt5 11:18 7irl•n anprot:11 in nrin ^ittt.e.
While- tiro Urfioer:+ of Iha A. ,orf:t! i m wtr.... Ill -,I rnetr
prom: =.i
is a r,•n;vnalll:• one^ !•nr :tll ltu•ti •• ;, any r!.rei an!1r,• '
I- =n4•jt•et In nrielrn ::;:pra:a by :e Im, thet•d:+ ml.jority .ir t11r•
Ilrnmr•.twn••rs within the A- P,wia'tino„
The. hoard of Uirrrlor= is nut t•tr mworr•el to ,..^ant, filr:l :tn,rocnl•
'Tr anpr •n i:e l:• gone• :;r,•Inl I'or "I:r inlorerl.. in :1••t •1•,11 ciq
r;mr nI -ws., :m-1 + !rill 1v: n1•n.,n,1 to .•nn t'inne to m., rf< !1!+ c'n
in firili /imt t,h^ irom gal.
For j!p. Ilonr,l nr ilir•;•1•tr.-
U .... ...... fill it'
,
.:.: .., I ;I r
rt.
Railb
y
s,
v.
;»
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -95
• A RESOLUTION OF THE .RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING M',MISSION
RECObIMEND MG APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -09
REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FR0;9 R -1 AND P, -3 TO
R -3 /PD FOR 11.03 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER CF
HIGHLAND AND HUM AVENUES - APN 201- 262 -2A, 30, 31,37 &
SO
WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1932, an application was filed and
accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 13th day of October, 1962, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65354 of the
California_ Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following Bindings:
That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area.
2. That the proposed Zone Change would not have
significant impact on the environment nor the
• surrounding properties.
That the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with
the General Plan.
0
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this proj e -t ,ginot create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on
October 13, 1932.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 658EO to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Plannino
Carmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recr.;nmendS approval on the 13th day of October,
1932, Planned Dpvelop�ient .No. 31 -09.
2. The Planninq Commission hereby recommends that the
icy Council :nnrove and adopt Planned Development
No s1 -C9.
3. T'nrt i C�rtifi,,d Cony of chi, RosoLition and related
nat:riil hornbv by '.ho Planninq Comm sc ion
s!ii I i '.,e for:nrrtr; r.o clip i ty Count i 1 .
`. 7
Resolution No.
Page 2
4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative .
Tract No's. 11804 and 11305 shall apply to this
Planned Development,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982.
PLANNING COMMLSSION OF THE /CITY OF RANCHO CUCX�IONGA
BY
ng Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ana
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 13th day of October, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MGNIEL, STOUT„ BARKER, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE •
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING
;c
i
C C
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -94
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11804 AND 11805
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Maps No. 11804 and 11805 hereinafter "Mao"
submitted by Peter B. Allen, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total
planned development of 76 condominium units on 11.03 acres of land in the R -1
ad R -3 zones (R-3/PD pending), located at the northwest corner of Richland and
Haven Avenues, into 3 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for
public hearing and action on October 13, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
• Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following fi n cings in
regard to Tentative Tract No's. 11804 and 11805 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all
applicable interim and proposed general and specific
plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to taus^ serious
puoiic health problems;
(f) The design of Lhe tentative tract will not conflict
,vith any easement acgiirod by the public at large,
nca of recor,l, `Or of C.:SS through or lise of the
prooerty .ithic the prono;ed suadivision.
r -
Resolution No. 82-94'
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on •
the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11304 and 11005, a copy of which
is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Elevations of all sides of all buildings and garages
shall be provided in the final construction drawinas
and reviewed and approved by the Design Review
Committee prior to issuance of building permits.
2. Temporary street tree landscaping shall be provided
along Highland and indicated on the detailed
landscape plans.
3. Trees shall be planted between garage doors.
4. This approval shall become null and void if the
final subdivision map is not approved and recorded
within twenty -four (24) months from the approval of
this project unless an extension has been granted by
the Planning Commission.
is
5. Directory signs shall be provided at the project
entries to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and
appropriate sign permits shall be obtained.
6. Details and typical elevations of walls and fences
shall be included in the final construction package.
7. The meandering sidewalk on Haven Avenue shall be
redesigned to conform to City standards.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
8. Alta Lonia Avenue street improvements shall be
installed with the first phase of construction. The
portion west of the westerly private street
connections shall include all street improvements
except pavement and shall include a temoorary
traffic barrier of a design to be approved by the
City Engineer. The paving in this portion shall be
replaced with hydroseeded grass, provided with an
irrigation system and maintained by the Homeowner's
Associaton. A cash rleoosit will be required to
provide for the cost of the future paving.
is
�T
i
Resolution No. 82 -94(
Page 3
9. The sidewalk alono Alta Lcma Avenue shall be
adjacent to the property line.
10. Emergency access to Highland Avenue shall be
provided with first phase of construction.
11. A reimbursement agreement for the construction of
the east half of the Haven Avenue median island
shall be executed per City Ordinance Ho. 170.
12. Installations of a stormdrain pipe system from the
westend of Alta Loma Avenue to the existing drainaae
pipe in Highland Avenue including all catch basins
shall be required to the satisfaction of the city
Enoineer.
13. A lot line adjustment with the property to the north
shall be recorded concurrent with or prior to
recordation of the tract map.
14. Access control shall be required along Haven Avenue
except at the extension of Alta Loma Avenue.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1932.
PLAWIMS. C0:1MISSION OF /HE,0TY OF RANCHO CUCAFIONGA
BY
ATT;
ecretary or the Ylannlna Commission
1, JA.C': LM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucammonna, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regvlarii introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ren_ular - ie2ting of the Planning Commission held
on the lath day of October, 1982, by the following vote -to -alt:
AYES: "':IN ISS LONERS: Barker, ;10iel, Rempel, Stout
;IDES: CC). %11 SS IO;IERS: f10N'c
AB�CIT: CVNISCIONERS:
n
-7I
.m OEPMURDI OF M-yeSITT DEVELOPMEIIT
• s4a'.DtaD ca::0mofs
fdvliant At4zj - - - - - --
Lmpatnw: Those Ite-s Oc"Id are Irndltlens of approval.
I. UlC *u SIAM W-JACT 111E R +" :.t5l. DIS'IS104 FOR CO°.PLIATCE WITH 111E FOLLOTHnG
(1- MI1Jro:
A. Site . _.. ^n[
ZI' Sri' Snail br dr,elcpcd to accordance .ith the appr.Y,d site Plans on file
in Ine Planning Division and Ile Conditions contained herein.
L I. r.r,sa] s,,, Clant end ;uilJ ing elevations Incorpora tlfig all c.nJl [i.n5 01
arn..a) snail to a utmrtted to the Planning 0(vision prior to Issvantt of
building "Ill. 1.
lllbrr�z 1. Ai.• "1 cf "is "the" gall let valve ce:vplfance with all 4e1lionz of
1..1^.:01 and all other applicable City grdiwnctz in effect at
erne of Puild mg remit issuance.
3. ll., fie- . -I..., .r'll u—'M all Inca with adequa [e s.dp1ar4 area For
Pecreatl.n Vehicle itorag.+ pursuant to City Standards.
5. T-1, rrrlllr,[y are, z1l.1 0, encl es [d br a 6 loot of qtr mA n.nY ,call with
%('nc Sing gad es pursmnl [o City standards. Location shall be
S -bjeat tc approval by the planning Ghlsion.
J b. A s1`1e of qe roof na tin o, 'hall be submitted to the Planning Division
Ier review and appror,l Prior in Issuarree Of building permits.
�1, I. All roof a i urtrmn'll. including air conditioners, 41.11 by arChitoctur,lly
_ /.lted, T re
snrelded fr. view and the sound burf[d f— adjacent P'squ, tie'
w so, Sire,,, a, regvi rid by [re Planning and t-111 ng Divisions.
fnfir to am use of the r,,j,c, site o, Uus loin acllvity be," c cld
1 -11c., all cu^f, tier,, of I,,—) ,nn tamed fix em sh w
all be cgdetsd to
the Istl,ractinn of 11, Urr,cb.f of emimm
]ty Derr, loyven [.
9. 11:r, ipP o.al z ".elf G,pnr roll and vole If banding pNmitS are Trot Issued
for ,,, .role.. .i thin one year find 11, da t! 1,l P,.jlet eDrrnval.
`mr,— lo. AS a 5on<il : +.:al ace " "it. u:i, or.j[.t shah become nun and void to
.:` -1. Uhl •.nth, Ihcn date al app,aval, --Ills p,rmaz are t„uert Dr
11 rl °nvM n m^plelnd.
�11. A M,ai l�,l Irrint ing plan ,hall to ,uMitted In and app,nv<n by ,lie Plannin:l
Eras, iLn rr, or td 1144 cote of to ii d ifig Cemei U. Such Plan ah,II Ind it., to
style. II L, +,.,einm, Inc a t ton, no i got and method or stir a ld ing, no li9h U.,
,hall ad+ersely Ifre<e adjacent properties.
2`12- All , ,:- +coq Pao lz An,tal l ea at the tine of in l t sal dev[lo,, sea 11 be 0.
solar era led.
mZ11. Te.tur:ces red,atrlan p'[h.:ay, across circulation at sits i,,IT Ur pro' id[d
tyro -gMnt the Jevel .... ot to connect d.ellfngs with open ,Pat,, and
1111 ationai uses.
Project to.
/<. All trash Plan up Intl, he r., i.,I,id nl um is ., to all r •Pt ¢I!t Shielded
firm Public vie., it no <entrnUn3 1111h rn,.,tacl.. a..
15. Standard Pali. cover pl]ns sh.rll be IYtait bd to a-] xrr, -d CJ the City
Penner and Omilnin......... prior to occrnanly Of tro first unit.
116. A11 bullding's 0.11,115 and Icl,vrdu-,; u -its sail, fie 4 enbf1ld In , clear
antl corns, rann,r. Including proper illulr oat, -,
�12. Solid core exterlor door;. le In Installed
dead bells and lock; ball to
do each unit In this project.
_ I0. Security devices such a, window locks Shall be installed on each unit.
,1z 19. All units within thi derelolmml shall be yrepl -robed to be ad,ptM for a
solo voter hea hr .1cit.
L 20. Energy censoring building materlals and apolian, e, a ,eJ to b
Inenrporaled Into this project to Include such thing, asrblt not jr,
nto-, IO
I.d,,.d con%rrti.s tnew,r head,, terse, g,ae..r in;vl+[ion. double Paned
windows, ,tended overhang,, plotless ecpl unce4, Hc.
�21 This dolmrnt shall pro. Ide an option to borne to,.,, to rnrt w nn • ,.lay
boosting unit.
air fattier, o1 then po 1(ilre Prot,'ttoo District.
tnls tract to Ire ut4-
2J. LOCIT and Master Planned Eeontrian bails snail t. prune ^d th,ou;h -,t the
trail Pilo indicating the [qurstrlan trail Plari. A 1 ^Sri ba a; 0:L tan
and weed control, i g IC- ld.V111 within s,nl es. rt:y:iul « nd It 'd, J.ncl,:n
re mintltted to and erprmed by one City Planne,rpri.rr,il itInj., . Shelf
tardatkis of the final map. arprpv,l and
_ a. IDls tract Sean form or ,dl.c to a maintenance district for ma,r,,,,mee or
19.1 lrlan trails.
2S. SSrert oases sea Jl be r rte + ^J and apprmied by the CI LY 1,l atom,, i .rJ cote
with the adopted street eRuide, policy, peiar co appC"I mnl re Dina t..n of
the final ma,. c
26. IT this dlvel.,e,d1 Intend, to rn 1,'1, t ,nun true or a „t ^.,1 rq Itrd n
In Specific Ipl, o, Prph, bit then enti,elr. then a Cnp1 .r We C c. a of 5t
mite be 4oMd t «d m and fe+le.ea by the City planner Prior t. .ru,ova of
final man.
_ 21, This pr.ece snarl Provide percent of affe"Itie honor, anal,.!
fits. in c NS...... with �I Plan hooting Col iC,,, and tl. n -CiS ing
polo is defiled in ill Grc,lh IN caA " ^ -ent orJ n :a nee. At /p rnepi lrlr Wall
hr nrtnmineJ by cn,v.nt ma n et rat ^4, rents and naaian tncr +'� Ir,el4 at
Ue tine of con,lructrnn of tl@ CrGtt[. An ,N b, +ant to l— 111,0 be
approved by !fie City Plano a prior to lcl--, r of bonding Permits.
Pa rk In A Irnq ul ar Access
1' DllSwano 'nail contain an fsl.na4 man -eve a urn-. om,Ne din en... n
18- walk adjacent to pm Un4 stall.
parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 Salton site.
• • •
- /l, • L: • -ro Sit In 1-r 4t tlull Dr J mmsnnn DI 2fi trrl .iJr. •
/a .. .511 b• v:l::l. nth n i l in Sao rlrstt
d.111.1 [ •tl rr,[I IOn r:l., v,tn f ol;I
/a. :It r „sr• :J 5_rt o al t.• m::ole strlpea.
IT Y1 I, r: n, D',l x+,11 fro to 'v l is garage III, areners.
I. r- :x ..,tin use r Pus ro III's sl'sn be turf blocked.
! r- rictimn sbntl'I'll ict the stiI of Ira
' , "sbnral
P
5 tr to ,m lrts ^r are the principle source of tram ra nation
L 9. L+r'rn ,. rr °'ll r••r •nt ^E r. itlnn the Intel Ior cira:OSirn aisle rtlrr loud
tpJ .rsr . ;.0 hen mnv Cnve`.srrts. Codes. art 8111. icti :ms
l -! - -I 1, IL, s;oticant ]nn SvLaltten to me city rlann ... 9
ell nsre. ,r or to rsnun¢ of building permits.
arrI err hat I.A. plan shall be loth's tied to DnA afrrored
f.l t:1- ri]'n,r.g tl'v Sion prior to the issuance of building rermsti.
L '. fn:; .1151 Ix. r. a ill b• . a.d '.:b ^revrr (.,,able. A cater plan rf
N.fspr r<itr lacnueo. Sim Ind I, r'• almll br
`(-j,•t ., ^1 ^ :.r� _arJ phn shall In+c Into ar rt U :1- ^'ot`avd
"`;e•fl.- Rtnx :xrd. tr is :III-rlmds. mud uh. :::.✓
I... -I • . N Ll'u'. t ^ +r rrt la-,'eut of rcndved trees. The Ili. 1; e,I,i,Id
u ea s ,`.sli I,-, ac,rtoCd by the ylanning Division prior to approval
rf Ihr Iuxal :" ,do.; pl Jn.
_Ll S., br a �• nr 15 gal inn S as or brA.r sacks has fuck I..11rd in
Pick: of street a ,Is far -tlie Oty of Rnasa
p, .- .�i. r • shall Ic Vlantel at Jn average of every )0' on interior
street; anJ ?U' on r Idr,or stmt'.
d. P _r,a an r.! s0 ur..a 1-..r grass aae. camvrised of the lollil "'I,.
sue ll to iths,d.d wither the !C,.loN,ent: 1011 -ZA” M+ dr larger, y0: -IS
I'll., ]rd 10: -S ""I'.
f5. ell la..:; -af +d ,r as ;tai tr m]LLL.'Ined Ina healthy and thriving aon-
J1unn, free rem n.eds, trash, and deDrff.
gyp. all sl:;e D,n: a1ilea ^ ^I tnJ t'+teU a5J Irr,g rt,•de.in i1-Ctorauel rata Ilol'1 nr
nick +l r alrc r ^n'S of Il ^ ertl of fan[M tuea :nnove Such 51Vre "'I'arng
.]Il o.gJ Io 11J to cH?eland c n.l aVl•r i'+ ,lr
i nrl Ir.[ All - ,,, planting aIld if igr lion shall De cnntr :'reoely
: -Ir rn¢1 i A r,IV/ and tnr,r ,nq c,,,d.tl In by the I-Iti Rr ..'a "All
t Pis -pid Jnd OS CUm rO by the bode r. rr ear Ip fCl cal inn
lccr'lut, for ucr pre, s, a inspection of the slopes spill he CA cl ^ire
pr lee 11- Staff an rirt^,aine MIt it fs In It,sfdLlAry mneitinn.
1). An
p - ^• .r a,- srrtC rn au, 4ro'—pirl sMn n, (.11, xma one ty a
rat Pena sin, m ] aC<rpb Dle 0 tLn city- f4Ot
of r , ^Irnanie iNll De Jobnittea to the City prior to iswanee•Of rDullJ mg
a. u,r Ir. n1- ya..f ter, :J;<]N nn. +r'I an aorrwri.te irrig,tmn srtt(*, Shan be
installed 4r uR 1w Npoel In ....ream Prim srrdnl neJ rl n.a. ,
2
/0. u. Imn1 d ^ :Lpr nr IL^ t^ i-Irr I r,l.rr :. x•511:, la, %uni.,p Art side. ♦ I,; soon e^ Ind oral m the rr......I Ir :r : :n- Ilan' I" ;c All ne
tnblrct t0 aP;o LId) by tnc flarminea Ox'. 1-
_ lo. A oloi ,.e or _ o, me trrrs Ilano-n x•Itnin lee Irnnct, tlnn De
srn -finer sirs 1:'1-1-5.
/ 11. Srea al lamhcnn• @alines suJ: I-.
TTT - -_ are t. m an'Ie rrng a 1.d,nq. IT ,,11 115. :1 .11..1
sue
sid 1111 Ib+tn vnl +cal 1-M Dor,tontnl O`m %1 I'll tnted, f"ed
Iardreaping, n reg•dred along - g ✓�- t\!_1_•�E_
D. S.'r,
nary sinus Dmrovd for lh,s drvnlel',nt Sl,all L^ drs,Ir.• /t V,' crnl n. e:nte
.i,h we [ * :r :Drnernsl v1- see„ D,mn]nce 'I'd Iolll r Ins removal
by tlm Dlannmg olvisi en prior to Iniullatmn If•SUChr S! ^. n1fN
3. A toifory sine llarllam for this Arrelor'amt 'b II1 le sat IttrJ Ir tl,
PI]rvrng 01v,sion for their revle•r an,t alrvrm,Il prier In issa]rce of
Dv lleing prrnel.
_ ]. 1Pe signs ineilrted on the si,tritt'd maul are, Mt anr•o:•d with this
rDPrO' :al and +rill require IL,,,ate 5i,A AOL. anJ airl'rora 1.
[. Atditir l Anprrvals Reylnd
1. Dr -elcI Devie. shall be accnnDlisnre I'--' to in' "I"Irlo ell a 0uflding
Den,dt.
$, Drvelopne„a Rden shall be at[a,nDlr ahc.l Dries+ tD recordlLoo D( the final
Inhh'i'mrs map.
1
). Approval f dents v tract I drrn ^d s.. >j e<t M mr ng•rnm1.
-- pf. PP. IL-! ?Ya� }iIPCOatYj�1.---- - -- - - --
e. This Cprddil l Use Permit Is gra.be for a rrr,rd of roe Ods) et
W ich ti, n the Planning o mission ray add or delete tooE:Tans cr revoke
taw conditional u :e re.nit.
5. Ihr drvelarer 1, required to ont+in m� follunin, s 'mi satn•nt by
-- frrthasrrs of 111.1-5 oldch have I Drlvate or Public enu^strran [rail en ar
adjacent to their property.
In rlo chi,ing lbr heme located or: Let Lact _
on __. I ""e ref -dire 1-.c. e k T; and
unJ rsl.lnd thin rail lot It :rhaett In .I rutc,l rntiprdcal
eIt far m+ Darpoie olr+ l0rir, 1I.IILrran tranm to
gain access.
Segued
I'nxtha :sr
Said ttdtcnert n to be, filed by T :e de'reloplr .ith the ear Prior to
occupancy.
6. Pr in+ I annovl Annnr 1,ld,,tlen cf r_tr fm -,1 •,e, n• =nn. 1^ I•. -. m..te of
TTT In ilA ing fn ell, • r iuI..svit,rn nip Is 1 sonL I. n"rn to unlit Was
lrnm Al . n¢tr,l Sa MOlndianct :. ".It Iw :d -a tb.d tr .. I• ^n•b. n :q of
ta..mn,tr n.•.r lnrn.,xt vhior s4,trr ta,at A.legrltr +e
fltnxur :.5 rr
•in rr o,rnlae ul I :CO :roneting Ibrn,..rl: g.•nrn lr.l ry u,rs p.., l ^r t. 5r1n
letter DI cernfi ,tiro rust hove tries i rd 1•r ter S,J "I 'It. „ t ulhm
Jirty (6n) d,Yi el e, to the final asp st-,ravel sn V+ Ise rf o•• sub
.v nap or I....5..1, ell permits in 11, 1,,119 of all ether rnplrntul
P.nJeI t'.
/y. [r far 1'r al`: era al JW rffnn /.tl enn o[ Inv IIIAI ,v rn. I, pr inf In IFr 14 t:,J nCe
[1 1 -rr1 l: n.l err "I[[ r.r nal' IS IF Ve I::f'I, rril lfn [f flit r(airrn Ir ::,
I IA¢
.: 11'] "r�m rt Jn an tin [r'`t lnrrl a`ea :rrnf a:el ue lrr lacih [rr l r r or
L - " •r["I ^rr lr, Cr nlf t, ..lull 1.^ SYI ::, llr.l !n tl.r
I r.• 'nl� r „r Ir' [r'r
m I:ru.
l
•r1r 11 I•r, ],(IS'a•rinr tJ: rO1 of [! U4l prlr n'r' in !nr• l a or lr atFr
a "Ill r -It ern a] ar3 r:`.1 V to fn „VOl nprarJ ..nit lh! City'I�ri IL .lnnble
- r.IJaILp. m[IuJing all surteltbe into,l tian, Stall
I'f cC[arm,! AnU Sv:'Ilttea to the CitY-
___ M1. lna a ..rl tl.rll prrn.c null an] laid if 1. Lrntative tu1.,ILil m. ta,
i(.r ,I,u rl!, rl r• l,rilar ng pf :SI IS 14 funs rJ:r : :
L rba 1121 �o +ths iron
nlM by the plarpravl M lnrf p. o]e(Is
I•'r4 t � er tent: n h,:[ tv'n gr..,r:m
9. Enia L +11i 11 r,^ 4'•iy tf no, m:,iL tea as a tnlal Uer¢ICr•,eet Pliant, 1,11 faint ralina relative to th- dish, [,than of
[no ”[ n•dv'Jn:e prior t0 IinJl ap"oral a r n,d.ltl Un If
rlv rf [se s.:.en vnn is g
-DI !o o0 develoiaJ 11 trIethunni.
�:fellC•.t 5•'ll :Ififl 11:F
:J 111 FAl ^L'.G Dil'I51DY FM C111118(E 1I1N INE [OLI V.i ills
(f :.::
o• -ply ..to Ibe latest "dented Uniform Building cr,f,
LII c:[ -r al:; ir'l a•,•J..sandrry ihYll^i title, hJtimlai Ilectri( LIJe. and
-n-"t. c^ era nil cei in effect at the tl:e of iisnance
_/ Sitlr to tsu m_r rJ pUtlJ
no Pe—its for ¢rlrbirstible [onstructinn, eriUenre
[A bb- rpotnill Diabi[t Fire [nier [Fat 1¢rq•m ary aalcr
nreln u: cLlrn s a( ,S mn is 4I,lhibla. binding eeoplellmr of required
fnfr la O:f itsm•C^ of a building Perm a
Density rill a new ridentlal dmlii g
Ir..rll t) c: l: or l/It Li cn to an e.itting unit(s). the abplic..t snail Pay
v .:••..i .u[ ton tt :1,.. c""llo¢d -to. Sven fee, nay in[IuJe. I:nt not
tPty.tl; land fPIAn ICI:eCking flat. and S<Mel ereez. Sys [nos
(. rn.,r [n lte it.n rncG or a building nbrgft for a n¢r Cw'mcr[ial o
M1 mn;
or r Industrial In ^act l[n� es 0'vl nlrJ 'at.. SlIth fees les dint h"lUl pull 1'ay
le L -r41 b: Sist"'s Ce"Icf^ent fee. Drains Fee. Gonit ralntl plan llrL
(Ilea r:,l feat 9[
5. St rrvl a].be:3fa snail be provided by the Wilding olrl[IJ1.
�6 ( ills UCle rtS ib.ill V. c.I",u".d Nth fire retardant rtJter Nl aM non -
1. All ca n r a_ ^Ilsnls r3nlll half the
Yyr..L d .,r to ad4rt Tonal ncoe trim arovnlO Wilding lllg !hr iVh`1
ana .hire annra:rrrate. an sb4ing of plant.
.- I_a[�R•anvns.
-�-
I. hro Or
a•`pl ianc[ '1 pm IMI(rm 0-1 id l eg CeJe tar nrnpu'ty line clod rAngq
<]:•a rd ^ /ing u'.e. ar rJ Jnd fi fe.ref Tall rerM 43 of [sitting W,
n[gn,rgUl al bn4 slnrl Ur tin teMn to "', ly.rtn cvrrint bn lllhq old
1".. d I. or the to llbng SF,rll br d[rnligeJ.
)- piH inrl if. pf di;nn;.rl la [il ii ifs shall be ."d fill rd uuVnr capry•d
to CV III, alto be on r lore piwbI., [ode• aM D:rlfprlf Culidirrg (one.
I1. ling HR�GA/
11. (.r 3A inN nr {Iln Su:•)rrt p,n
pe i -c rr Jrn:r .ri to ill
1]n lfnn3
nri plinq Cn.Ir - r ^fly Y:11
li:l 1 (ill I:raJ i n9 SIAnl" Ills inn a•op••.1 q. uh r.a nr ¢rrc rs. Inn
z JU[r.•I... l rII pl In SG.tll Le In S:r n:bmllal [1' ”' ::.ln[e - " "" -,9Ioled
grad m9 VI aI.
soils report ihs 11 be Prepared by a onili[ied enyueer Ile .... it by the
State of [alifoin a to pee lY rn sac, upr k.
J. A diluent Ill reDOr[ SWII oil Ftt•a rt'1 pY • NraM1 li!U rv.gLo-r or g!01o91z1
Old fulml[leU at lnr lire f arPll[atlpo far g:adl, pLln Cr:rcl.
L 1. ihr. fiwl grading DIa. ibill De ill, t !0 rev ie.r and n nml pl the
DYading Cw pd+tae and s)oil be fn': pl•t a•1 PYifr to rernrlrt ion Ill ter final
sabil lv
is -.p or I....... of Wildln9 I•amr[ :•n is b.;rrc « r3 fir,,.
5. As A [YSton -lot sabdirlsbon, the follo.ing re'pJ r•.�rn It in", t^ vet:
A. SuretY iWll W Lotted and an a ^...rent e.rcN!N, gra fen teeing [e.'Dleborr
of the on -tile drainage Ocllitle3 ne[rstary for Jt .lttrinl all Parcel sr
to the zatlS NCt ton of the Building and Sefety Divninn,
D. APpraprla la ea 5(snIt, far SArr di3fr3al or :Irt-nr':• „rtrr Intl are r
mJn[t!d unto o r adla[rnt I..... t, u� in .e art m.p r•] And
recorJfd to the Satitipction of t. ".e Blulding And Sa rely ..i',,, an,
C. Drr -s llr drainage Improves n[,, Ab......N tar 4" Ir.•rlr.g o 11tectl.1
thin Wilding SY ^d pernits nreI, lea. are LO bn installed frrnr lr It:aance Ill
lo, o Lon tf lbY tlSa tO,odrd In "�,'n Y ^nn arrI iar[rl thlt Illy be s':plfLt
DIII., relative to nb lch a ba ld lnar3 and n'ing% tae. „9 or vitMn A
9 Pe rmll Is e•1'r "t trrl.
d. final gndl ^9 Dl ant for inch parcel ue to be
"""t"d In the OrdleuD
(F60 Sa fe [y ei vi Sfon for apPrareO Pn or to ar b0 b,ing Pirelli.
I In is may be on an Incrzn¢n Wl or crnpositatpes is�l
e. All SIoDe pan Y3 in eaw.. of rive (51 .rill in ....... nn I"", and DI
5:1 of or,s ter slopd sb, 11 be se•Ne.l vi In .,, II grli:ri u n; le lien
of 9faUing ar I'll other allrn:at ire n•u.rf ru,"n (oWll
be ll conpleted
111. to llle ratl ifettion of the Dulld,..g Plf q la 1. IFrtga p an
stall De prov lJfd to germiw k• the seed and n:t inli in gro.. th (a a po lnl
61nalhs after 9ern i,u lion.
colu bon SUlill [OOiACI iuE E1161bEEP1115 01v15109 'OR CPnPll:110E vita nlC lumin[
CU1101CAllt 1
hd i/rt lons_aM_NeF iarl a_r_A_ccf st
L 1. De•lications hill br nada by Ilwl rep of all
af-msy and all Inertia. Interior sbr••t right,.
Y rf :e to .I.
g- Mdieal ten iMll be rode of he follo.in9 rightsrof-.ay on the follaning
s[tee ts:
_ "' ithi -al feet In _
__ a'IUI IIOn.I IMt on _ '
_aad4iarui het an —
/1. Corner Ncperb Ilne radius will pe - - -- --
rrquhfJ per City ua'Id vk,
a. All r191,ts : of reMLYlar ingfui to and egress hen sW I1 re JeJiu ltd
a4 lot lows _
S. Yeei pr ..cal read, zneil I:e mnridr`J [n sue ira atLrss m all Pnr o•Is
over ap ra tc roads, dnrri. or .Art nrg a wt, ann shall be nil t lL" dA
enn rap or snail be reeerded concurrent Ili [n the vu D.
•
^
.
00:'el la� ��l�•�
_ err 1•rnil
t m FU r I I
Id
ri
r. n U.• nr ^ -ib all rr. r. ), L• to
t IavnreY
i !e p D W1 Lets,, Iite
r: Anil cn.11V
a 5 -lot n'000;• be m.In inW
•rl N.! Ir� rr n row Ill.] m; ilm Iie'l
y 11. n5 G1 Ir ow, Shall not
is Uutt
nApMll
�R :11
bAlni ti C.q lit Ip..lrr slCyl4
t. ill drain 411
r•'•tiin r « .nt{fla u..] wi: pin future rigpl- nl -.ny are to le
i..rr tc l.nr.l rr ra !^ Jr Fn'v [rJ
II. An r Jittlpl toe asst /or er n;irn
<n lA! now Cer Gt [n
Y 9rne.... rm:ub pen lt.
le Il.nr]l rr. nl r/' r. r5 new{ srnll he
tali Sflll ino of he fry IaIIW
A let1 Ulr fn.)mCG r. t l4r
1+:. -: ,q: l..r vl. 9t for p.!Ile.....pall 1 < &Ji[alW to
nJ n^
R, of drainage rurpli ,t, thG v S!ap R•r.•n.
ownnr3 wall abe
lim city
wr m: r 11.,ao' Prlr..lr oropn ry. r
. b. require J. r. '4 r.la prerer[y
J. 't•rlr 1-f. -.., mta
.. Oo inaral Ylnnd Con bnl
✓ 1. Ir -r.,cr emit
• - [ i-
at .•.nananti incIDQinq. but not limited to.
mrD an,l 7+t ter. A. [.
-f I. The applicant will I'rapmgible for Eons Vuc trap el all rnslto
d""' a IAUlllies required
pan•+eo', lid walk, drip ipproaehes, partway
0111 deed "I'll Lgrt on all interior
M lAP Ci IY,""cll.
steels.
-]. Inter" "I. tlnins .111 M regolnd
- _ }. A rip:::, qr ;(.r-rt wrJ- r.rvr-'rnl within a e0 -loot wide rtedi[at"I
n'rra
a[ Y.e Following loutlonf:
-cr.. ar v.al sac tea for all Falf. section
/
_L 1. I'• %t'•rt de felliuw in
I r. it• -f In: g ^i ssinq imploremwrtf I.ITha Mg, Lot wt
� -]. line nropnsed project lal if within "Ill InEi utM as wr•ieat
flooding under
"IVVrRG c:,t,j
_
lee uaf Weal (laid M
Inc Iron sl onl o! tht Ian. Wbl rCt b
_ - - -If "- A(. -$1 n`=- OVITi: -1cEE i- -•a in4-
Sr r[IT r. ^ "f r,•a iEn
or.,," and City ordirumce ':a. psis
r
Adra Ina
1'tll. YlI 6: To. ...... O'aGIAY
___ ISIA::D DMER
- - - --
'�AYQS/ 7�- _. x.�E4Yp�
_4. ccMnn
9 el and /Or Ile.1 Croler.11on will will n•
pro tell the Slrentvre3 el diYerling se,.Cl rvnnff ID ftrpntt,
fto. drain. lid Oa
- - -� X
or
15.
✓ --
HIGIjELA,ypI__
adeenale prc Islon' &WL be made for
_
ICC ^O rAnre and dPr^sal b/
tra raq. ,t.,lf, the pro MrIY !nn aJla[Mt
_
arPai.
A• tf ttff 0('Ce"tantf flow dpl:nt[rnam
wMry rurro(/ I aWerly owners Shill L.
roll tM
_
-- — -_—
tract flow' nn to rrivat. ri we"
pronrrl lr t. D
- -
•Includes pnns[aA ing and vri ]J tipv on velN.
_L $Nil
ftrfeh reVUiln a t Linrtion
9 ow me) Jr ref"
d[md
tide trip a DI ......l
"""'.net. -rr'c lal
_ J. any unrb IM pob]IC rI0F1- of -nY. fe[s
allfr 'W/O' landSCapfd earth b¢mf aWnrp lied Sdr" on'
Ilne.
sl.ill to am low ,,ach.,ot pe
JW and an .. rDaClcml permit obit be ehtillld from lM
U[Y (ng F�Cer'1 oar ice. to addition to any
frat"tionrtY
d1 Mr permit. n0nind.
-.1 . The f011awing slop drain SMII be insbllW
Stet s.•ro e... t plan' ap now [rail peer and
V...rr airrra
1M city 111.Ar: to tM Htls Sac tl0n 01
y a ern Comilla' TI be t.,.t tl
nginrm Snail pr regabrJ, for all .treat
n [s. poor to lswa.rti of tn[ronila.11
-_ C d e✓U�p"'-� /
permit. final
im or UI 4lf liq ul it lly
bc.i.tfe, pwi[n{na,n,
—i
�-�-�4"� -r•— `^_g °IICW
right- 01.yy1Mrtlan
d. !u•r1Y
Y' rr10Y
'Nli be poll +d art! M ayra•.nenl eue[eted t0 lM sills la<tlon
D! Ne Ci'l [ng inrGr hot IM
+-
awd pr0lett
for lMrtldll en or [nee nap, a bread -Scale hybol'o"c
Cil A
U yr rvinht r. s.In, au •rnC. Prior to lrap[orylht ten
Aril dra lnage
fMll be tubmilled 10 tM ti'
plow. Y Engineer tar
ttOrJingaOf IM
ntm +ce o1 I•r Jd prrm.... whichtuer [One' li n 1. 1.
]-
UI II IL let
All aunt imp. ev.ren tf'Mil be tn1ta11N t0 M alhfactlAd of Ihf
(stY 4n{nrev, prior to eKUpan[y'
z1. rreriae all Yl lllb
d.
Sy"' feel to can lot fnc ludin
YtNr, el K tale ryner, p1, 111" lwo s.
; + + ^' ^•t .",p 'he na. Heg, Era flit an0 Street airy Sl9niry SMII M
net 411!1
and uMe lelavitlov cnndYlt.
=- All ."lit
O +'r tM reWtrrwm" of the CITY Engineer.
..L "",.]into llv pro l<cl sn.11 r[
i-1 Ndln 9 tll{iei dips ryjor mnl ^r0ro mu
_- S- talflieg ells rpid legnir ing rest,.drtiwwDe s1Jll Ilnmin to,
Nall it at
arleria l5 Tell In,. Ii IY.
]. UI II ItY Niemcnlf
all fie r3 min aJNln r[e Qelprrrs doe leg tent lru[t lOn A
t: la JYn:.t 'l all dC rrVOrrW
'Fall be pro.fii To lnr sr'M lllp llOn of
ferYlpg Ylil ily cmffewl"
tV en.el tin [o't 01
Pa mg, .m cF 11 111 e. lveded
Ue
and he City Enginr•el.
re c. looplat... o! the .Ontb..i ion to
,be vNafaction of the CITY [ryrneeq
L t• VerflOrer sMl; be rn Oonf idle (mr
lllili4, as t par rtllw atsen D( Crisl In
nui.W. g wmk
S. ern Oh" sM 11 be re'"ItIkll ter the intlillatidn or ,net Iigding
in u[wbmce with Southern Catifprnla
e
Edison [aoyany arm, fill tl,01
�i Y t ar..i Sr
rl s sn 11 M rt rg d A ro fir yrl rd In
v I l r n t<e ([ra I n,tl,m
mot n.,,l en mp]n•.,,t or u.,, rnnn lr
rl S:n n..,
title,
n.r.r ir,e. 5 Ie tter pf <anyl iancr Laa Clu U will Le rbp�ir rJ
It III
nn fn n.ra and
nI.,
t]e,1,, ill he v,r41 a <L to miy
-
• a. u, .y o n ], . rn m.rf rra,v
R.
Grrc rl Pr't _ ntt r,l h.i.frn .r _(
will De required a3 folew':
n[( /fymrNl Pripr to ,. au aria nl - -__ _
.•I L•. n,a a
r4.rur'I"
Ceenty rlend Control District
D. Dmrr: __
1Y- A
LI, nl tn: [•_ ]n ts. C.,,,, an] Pr][rlel.nnt (C. C. 6
mn
- :T111: of In,a prat ioe or the Ppnro.ners Association. supjeet
[n ;P.
y, t.,Jl Of tl .• City Attorney shall be rgortied with this nap
.m] ] e'I•r rn.rad to the ertr.
3. rmd
1
Iv ;et n'd Iract naps SM 11 <pnrprs to City standards and
rrnccJn.r2.
J. A I]r col n,•V trait be "'Icheed prior to rift phase I.WNifinn to
PwbT "a k,I or u e0ixed Wrceb.
1s. I. 1., to
r a ,. .n.na pc aicr or Intension eo rTm aria /nr Joln
l ^' ^:ev,x a�.J
l rge[rng nn [. icu snarl be lY lea with the City COwcit.
ne
t. rneenna m5E3 imoh<d in District rorWClon (hall be Mme
tY 'tn
6. AI I'•rl. r Ian,LCarN p Ik.. S ara r... iced to M annned in la
WW.pFe vnnle wnce diftric, the
la ,I c,I; rig aoJ vri•ption IY :1, required is be installed wt i<
Iwnl
n p.F -b -.ny en t" yrneeter el this lroet area she II De coot inuym ly
ra]in..d
by tie .lyr! leper until ...i"'d " ILe CITY and mne',ed
into
e\
lne Ignd:u [x ru {n;enan:e district.
rJ
5
iss loner Stout asked if the Commission can require permanent lot markers
• to b laced at the back of the lots.
Vice -chair Rempel stated that State law requires this within the provisions
of the Subd ivi n Map Act.
Commissioner Parker 3-taked that he is on the Design Review Committee and this
project is the first one at he has seen come back after having gone through
drastic changes. He commend d,&. Webb for their professionalism and skill in
making this a very nice project.--,_
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by 9�MkCE, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -93, approving Tentative Tr3bt�No. 10088, with the addition
of five conditions contained in the addendum reco�.n.ded by staff.
w
Vice - chairman Rempel stated for the record that a letter ha een received
from M.rs. Cadera relative to this item.
• * t f f
7:55 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed
8:05 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened
F. ENVIROIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO 81 -09 - TENTATIVE
TRACTS 11804 -11805 - ALLEN - A total planned development of 76 condominium
units on 11.03 acres of land in the R -3 and R -1 zones located at the
• northwest corner of Highland and Haven Avenues - APN 201- 272 -28, 30, 31,
and 37.
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report.
Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau, spoke of the improvements to Alta Loma
Avenue. He indicated that an agreement must be made with the developer
regarding the improvements. He indicated that after discussion it was felt
that the best method of handling this is to asphalt the street and hydroseed
the area until the future street is needed.
Mr. Rougeau stated this would be a good compromise because if they don't get
improvements now, it is doubtful that they would be able to get them in the
future. Mr. Rougeau stated, however, that this had not yet been discussed
with the developer. Mr. Rougeau indicated that the result of this would be
that this temporary street would have asphalt paving, curbs and gutters, and
with the grass, this could be used as a large lawn.
Commissioner Mc Niel asked how large an area he is talking about.
Mr. Rou;eau replied that it would be the width of the street and go for about
100 feet. He indicated that this woulJ be maintained by the Homeowners
Association.
:•
Planning Commission ,1inutes -6- October 13, 1982
Vice - chairman Hempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Allen, the applicant, stated that he is in favor of the grass on the .
cul-de -sac because they don't know how long it Will be before the freeway goes
in.
Pr. Alan Snapp, architect for this project, stated that he had worked with the
staff and representatives of the Garden Apartments to come up with a plan that
is compatible with the area in keeping with its rural character. He explained
the architecture that will be used, indicating that this would contain both
one and two story units.
Commissioner Mc Niel asked if the one, two -story unit referred to by Mr. Snapp
would create any problems with the adjacent housing.
Mr. Coleman replied that the unit is back from the property line but it does
look into adjacent yards. He indicated that there is a requirement for dense
landscaping to screen the view of the side elevations of the units.
Commissioner Me Niel asked if it is absolutely essential that this be two-
story.
Mr. Snapp replied that they have had problems with the density of the units
from the beginning because of the geometry of the site and they have had to
give up quite a few units. He indicated that he would have to discuss this
with the developer and could not make a decision on this.
Mr. Sid Silliman, 6126 Haven, brought some concerns of the Garden Apartments •
Homeowners's Association before the Commission. He indicated that they wished
to have the row of eucalyptus trees presently along the driveway to Haven
preserved because of its scenic contribution, and would be opposed to removal
of the trees.
Mr. Siliman indicated that the change proposed for Alta Lorna Road may increase
traffic when it goes through and the Horeowner's Association was opposed to an
increase. He suggested that it be built to a smaller width until the freeway
goes through as a means of cutting down on traffic flow. He reminded that any
changes brought before the homeowner's association require a three - fourths
agreement relative to what happens to the strip of land owned by them.
Mr. Rougeau stated that he did not knew if the existing eucalyptus trees match
up with Alta Loma Road. He indicated that if they do not, it would be
difficult to save the trees. Further, that the location of Alta Loma Avenue
has been set but it was possible for a slight adjustment depending on the
freeway deni,n, He indicated that any changes to its present location would
.require a redesign of the project.
Vice -c na irmar, He;npei remineoa the Lormission that when the ahoppin; center Was
before Gesi,;n heview they were r.:quir ^_d to put in their driveway where this is
proposes.
Yiar.r,in,; CO;IinibSien ;gnu Les -7- October 13, VjQ •
Pa•. Nouveau explained how the width of the street requested by the homeowner's
group would present problems. He indicated if this were to be built, it would
• have to be torn out and would then cost as much as a new street. Further,
that dealing with the homeowner's association would be infeasible. :^.r.
Rousseau stated that bonds are not a good way to guarantee future street
improvements because oftentimes the only way to recover the funds is througn
the courts.
•
R
x;
Mr. Vairin stated that in looking at the tract map it appears that the
eucalyptus trees on the north could probably be saved thereby maintaining the
character of the area.
tM. Vairin also stated that it appears that the cap coincides with the outside
edge of the sidewalk.
Mr. Rougeau stated that there would be 12 feet of parkway to work with so it
is possible that the trees can be saved.
Vice - chairman. Hempel stated that Exhibit 8 shows the street above and the
right -ot' -way, indicating that the trees could be saved.
Mr. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, added to what Kr. Rougeau said. He
stated that as a practical matter, it is difficult if not impossible to
convince a bonding company to write a bond for a long term that has no finite
limit in time. He further stated that the City would be better off to hold a
cash deposit for the street improvements. He indicated that between the City
office and theirs, they could figure out some kind of security that would
protect t.. ".e City if there is the desire to consider that kind of arrangement
on the street. Mr, Hopson stated that on the west, assuming that it is
dedicated property, the homeowner's association can be required to maintain
the right -of -way and the City would want a specific condition to say that they
would maintain the grassed area where it goes from Alta Loma Avenue to the
cul-de -sac on the west boundary of the property.
Comunissioner Stout asked if it is anticipated that there will be parking on
the Interior of Alta Loma Street.
a*. hougeau replied that it will be a public street but could be posted for no
parking. He also stated that it would help to have visitor parking.
COMILSioner Stout statea that they would be asking for trouble if the street
is narrow.
Mr. ,,ou.;cau stateo that in the future it will bo 44 feet because of the
traffic it will carry after the freeway goes in.
?'_ann_r ; Co=assion :.irutos -6-
•3 1
(4to•`.er 13, ty02
Mr. Floyd Allen, 6402A Haven Avenue, who stated that he was not related to the
applicant and was not speaking for the association, was in favor of the plan
as presented. He further stated that with the indication that the applicant, •
Mr. Allen, has made regarding accommodations that have been discussed with the
homeowners association, he saw no reason to make Alta Loma narrower.
Mr. Steve Kellogg, resident of the Garden Apartments, stated that he was
concerned about privacy and the ability of people to look into the back end of
patios and back yards.
Vice -chairman Hempel replied that the patios are at the east end of these
units. He explained the requirement for landscaping along the property line.
There being no further questions, the public hearing was closed.
Vice - chairman Hempel stated that this is another plan that has come a long way
since initial application. He stated his appreciation for what Mr. Allen and
Mr. Snapp have done in replying to concerns raised during the review process.
Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he lives on a very narrow street and he wished
it was wider because of the safety factor that arises when children play or go
into the street. He cautioned the Commission about allowing a narrow street
to be put in.
Commissioner Barker stated that Mr. Silliman's concerns appeared to be
twofold: one, the preservation of the trees and the narrowing of the street
to keep it an attractive through way. He stated further that cul -de -sacs
generally deadend a street and with the greenery at the end it would be very •
attractive. He indicated that the only way for people to be able to use the
street as proposed is for people to know about it ahead of time and this would
only be known by people who live in the area. He indicated that on that basis
he did not feel it would be attractive for use.
Commissioner Barker agreed with Vice - chairman Hempel in that this project has
grown substantially since it was first reviewed by the Design Review
Committee.
Vice - chairman Hempel stated that one thing that would help the street
condition is the imposition of a condition for a sign on the front that this
is not a through street.
Commissioner Stout asked if the trees are blue gum eucalyptus. He further
asked if they would be a fire problem.
Mr. Vairin replied that they are blue gums, and that they would have to meet
the fire district's code, and they would also have to be trimmed.
Commissioner Stout stated he was concerned with how close they are located to
units because of their potential fire danger. He further stated that under
certain conditions they are just like a torch.
Planning Commission Minutes -9- Cctober 13, 1982 •
Vice -chairman Rempel suggested that something be worked out between the
• developer and the homeownerts association to replace the eucalyptus with a
better tree. He felt that something could be worked out.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -94, with the added condition that an attemot be made to
preserve the eucalyptus trees, that all required street improvements to the
west of the property line, with the exception of actual paving, include
sprinklers and grass and that this be maintained by the homeowners
association.
Mr. Vairin stated that there is a second resolution that deals with the land
use designation and zoning on the property. For the benefit of the audience,
Mr. Vairin stated that this matter will come before the City Council for
zoning and property owners will again receive notice.
Motion: Moved by Mc Niel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -95, approving the Zone Change to R-3/PD for 11.03 acres for
planned development No. 81 -09.
• * • A w
.. ronnii nu. oe -[ - unuRCH OF CH IST - The temporary use of
577 square foot industrial building for a church facility in the
Gene Industrial category (Subarea3) , located at 9581 Business Center
Drive, es A, B, and C - APN 209- 021 -04.
• Senior Planner, HiCB,D Vair in, reviewed the staff report.
Vice- chairman Rempel openea`4e public hearing.
Mr. Don King, representing the chltrch, stated their desire to serve the
community. '4,0
There being no further comments, the public'1w�aring was closed.
Commissioner Stout asked if this is a standard resolption.
Mr. Vairin replied that it is and that fire code requireitanks have been
included.
Commissioner Mc Niel asked what is anticipated for a congregation 1a" )jture
years.•i.
t "s. King stated that they have purchased a piece of property on Hellman Street "�
With the intention of proceeding with building in about 30 months. He \`
indicated further that they hope to have a growth ratio of approximately 50
percent.
Plannin;, Commission ;linutes -10- October 13, 1982
� I
ORDINANCE NO. * 111��
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 37, AND 40, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND HAVEN AVENUES, FROM R -1 AND R -3 TO
R- 3 /P.D.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 37, and 40,
approximately 11.03 acres in size and generally located
on the northwest corner of Highland and Haven Avenues,
are hereby changed front R -1 (Single Family Residential)
and R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R- 3 /P.D.
(Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development).
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of tlovember, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
.may
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 10, 1982
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Ordinance 105 B a...•nding Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code relating to park and recreation land.
This amendment to Ordinance 105, prepared by the City Attorney's office,
reflects State mandated changes resulting from Senate Bill 1785 authored
by Senator Foran, et al.
BH /mw
•N.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 10, 1982
To: City Council
�p GIJUMQ.4 1,n
Gr yn
2
r
cl' P
f� � z
From: Finance Di rect r �
Subject: Request for Public Hearing from Mr. Joseph Dobson
Mr. Joseph Dobson, owner of Shepherd Rancho Kennels, 8694
Hickory Road, has requested a public hearing on the aspect of
having license dogs owned by a commercial kennel.
Enclosed are copies of our City code and the California Health
and Safety codes covering this particular matter. Also, you will
find correspondence between the City and Humane Society and between
the City and Mr. Dobson.
For purposes of introduction, Ms. Sandra Hackney, City License
Inspector will make the opening remarks on behalf of Staff. Ms.Betty
Fryman, Chaffey Humane Society Director, has indicated she will be
present to answer any questions directly related to the Society's
policy and reasons for strict enforcement.
Recommendation: Inasmuch as it is State law, and our local
ordinance supports the position of licensing kennel owned dogs, it
is recommended Council give strong consideration to maintaining that
posture.
V
1977
•
C.,� P.,.;,7
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Sandy Hackney, License Inspector
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Nttorney
DATE: November 10, 1982
RE: Licensing of Dogs Owned by Commercial Kennels
Califor:.ia Health and Safety Code Section 1920 requires an
individual license for each dog kept in a rabies area. According
to Betty Fryman, the State has determined that the entire County
of San Bernardino is a rabies area.
Section 6.04.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
entitled "Vaccination and Licenses -- Required" is in accord with
State law.
• Health and Safety Code Section 1920 makes no exception for
commercial kennels. -
In the past we have commented on Food and Agricultural Cod
Section 30807. That section permits local governments the option
of exempting commercial kennels from the individual license ta—a
requirements. However, in view of Health and Safety Code Section
1920, a City located in a rabies area has no power to waive the
requirement that each dog be individually licensed.
The : Council his the authority to, but need not, estab-
li.sh a lo.aer license fee for dois owned by commercial kennels.
This, of c,;,irru, is a pnlicy rasue.
CG:C Ll;G iOV: Under State law and the Rancho Cucamonga
!runic i;si r -,ic, der �s uwneai 1. ,' cowmcrcial 4:cnncls must be individ-
ual.ly licensees. No reduco�! iicense fee schedule is in effect for
1
commercial kennels.
RED:sjo
-2-
17
LA
•
rI
L
lJ
I, I
li.
i1
it
�1
i
�j.
i'
!i
I?
I
Ch.3 RAMS 1920
biish-
at any reasonable time. The law enforcement agency shall notify the
lid as
local health officer if the dog exhibits any abnormal behavior.
(Added by Slats.1976, c. 918, p. 2091. § I.)
Library References
I lealtL and Entirnnmrnr P27. 1'-I.Y. In•nitb nml I:ntirnvnrur 62II.
§ 1920. Regulation and control of dogs; maintenance of pound
and rabies control programs; vaccination clinics
In rabies areas:
ieral
(a) Every dog owner, after his dog attains the age of four
months, shall no less than once every too years secure a license for
fund
said dog as provided by ordinance of the responsible city, city and
All
county. or county. License fees shall be fixed by the responsible city,
the
city and county. or county, at an amount not to exceed limitations
the
otherwise prescribed by state la%% or city, city or county, or county
charter.
(b) Every dog owner, after his dog attains the age of four
months, shall at such intervals of time not more often than once a
year as may be prescribed by the department procure its vaccination
by a licensed veterinarian with a canine anti- rabies vaccine approved
•
by and in a manner prescribed by the state department.
(el All dogs under four months of ago shall be confined to the
premises of, or kept under physical restraint by, the owner, keeper or
dog
harborer. Nothing in this chnpler shall be construed to prevent the
rvi-
sale or transportation of a puppy four months old or younger.
(d) Any dog in violation of the provisions of this article, and
er.
such additional provisions as may be proscribed by any local goeern-
ble
ing body, shall be impounded as provided by local ordinance.
(et It shift] be the duty of the governing body of each city, city
and county, or county to maintain or provide for the maintenance of
n pound system and a rnbics control program for file purpose of
carrying ou( and rnforving the provisions of this section.
:er
(f) It shall he Ihr responsibility of rash city, county, or cihv and
county m pno(11, dot; vaccination clinics. or to nrrange, im• dng vatri-
ndlion at (Hopi, oprr;urd by wrirrltlary group, of asnoriution., hold
]d
sir:nrglr Inr:ILnn< thl oochoul ,:I( it I ;y, city ;till room}', m wotln-
'y
ly'. Th" \:11'1'1 Imi'ml ;,fill It, '11,111G p"), vdlllo5 111;1 \' hr rmnhirwd :IS :I
MI
Plllgle npmllh011 in 'IP h i'1111IOS. An rhill'gc in l- xlvsp' of ;1('111.11 cost
le
it II he o1whe Iol' ,m) nor v;,monolion ill sw h Alai, No minor of a
m
dnq >h dl ho Icgnu,d to Ile%'. Ilk dog w .1rrimilyd ;d n public dint" if
275
lJ
I, I
li.
i1
it
�1
i
�j.
i'
!i
I?
I
§ 1920 PEST ABATEMENT Div. 3
the owner elects to have the dog vaccinated by a licensed veterinari.
an of the owner's choice.
All public clinics shall be repaired to operate under antiseptic im•
munization conditions comparable to those used in the vaccination of
human beings.
(Added by Stats1957, c. 1781, P. 3174, § 2. Amended by Stats.1970, c. 70,
P. W. § 1.) -.
Hin.rleal Hot.
The I970 amendment extended kneed
roauirvnnnL in audl. W. (ram "annually°
to "no, leav than .... a ,e,, too
Administrative Cade Reference.
Admivi„n,i.v and evfoi cement in u(ficially dectareA whin nrevn, see 17 CAAdm.Uode
JU)(i.4.
Library References
Animal, P30. C.J.S. 11c.111, and Evviromneut }y IS to
Health and Eovirintri ORS, "5, RR.
O.J.S. dnimsl „j 73 1. W.I.
Notes of Decisions
Mandamus 3
Unlicensed individuals 2
Validity I
1. vabdily
Srrlinu IWI.2. rmy.wrnua - liar... In
Ar.trnni ur :I c., wher, e,inbvu +• of rahirx
u..litnlyd Imhlie hrnch Ilnzn rd, ,lid oat
cnnm lull, nnUwOd d.drentt of Irai,l ,
yorvrr'. 'lud urt0. r 1 1 ol.-I .... the re
tied 'i:llliit, it rlu, of F11"Incla Lulu., of
ante slllrrli —o.. to Provide (or n linn•�
ionic, of innnrl avvb'm nod root of olio.
gran, liolnn.l I.nmbnitmu rrcrinllI. Or.
,arlmrnt III 1'nhliv IIr:U1h of ('III. n
It Ird of St, r of 1:0., Pmuuy (1!Call
:I:. ^., P,24 IS 1. 171 ('..\.Rd 99.
Th, R. it r I oolrid .1.'I , m1
>limtlnn'ni O.r f.11lore nr ufGurl low irr .... nd
IlPnnnuwly or hr hen nl r nVnl :ud
our .I I. r•yl lief rl.r.rrl6. Ili. pr
IIh!II.. r. rrt. rrl I•r irr . vlr rill
nil r. r'r.al :rlrr I..I...r r 1.11.. I.Il......
rl........ tlun r Ili u.in r. nl I dLn , nru.I IIUL
2. Unlieen,rd individual,
I'ud•r Cu A Pnn.l'. a I<� :. nUrr urrur
Icy nrhuulumn.l In a Ln luau uurb.r
276
Ile direr, s....... . din of a liceoced ,eteri.
mrian 1111W. (c) 1, 1 1 only . lieem,ll
'rlerinnnan n y Perfclio , y Ifukl.
IdI I. dli UR.,• \rtrdlrn. 31!I, UIit 73.
\n unlir.alrrrl illdlvldn:d uudrr tto Ain.n
rIt.... n lninn of a li, uncd r,lcrinariuu u v
nl. ".. nn Ilrnlidrrl to cotxl. (rl of lloc ��:\
1'roLU. f 1"20, all Arne +, in. fichn, rnbirn
will. n Ilrrvllp ulet r. rill r• I.ven 111
I rrabox nits II hrrr lam mtiuo for ,slur
n rrnuir,vI he th in.retioo. Id.
3. Mandital
Pr• I. (,if 'nl of Iua LJ" :. to r nitil
rymn."ol, I., ,I. nnhrl.u..... ill Pn..
rid., fir u r ruf V,,o ull +,y'.onn :ulrl
:Ili,., r rnlnrl I'r I: Lrr rblg> u. In :.
ilyd l
for Ili” III l,rnl, — It"1..111 :it
"aid .rf r.lirrr rnl ..... 1.1
IIL 11 lrl!11 I•JI rd "h..... .urn,
hit :-I'll oil :I1 . 1 .1. ot.or :.1.1.
r folk • n .r
I fir uIIII•rru�
11. ..Jlm0 &1, r . :
.rl.n1.. III
I it .d I'nldi.
11, :Ill l: of 1'nl.
111l It enl r it Id{J 1'n: :illy 11!C1.II
..al
1' 24 r;1. 1:1 I'.d.Jrl m,.
0
•
•
•
Div. 3
inari-
:cim-
on of
c. 70,
Cale
IS la
IUJ
reri,
vA
x109109.
inet
rpllr
r. A
ndr,
•n is
Jrii x
nprl
per
:mn
arm
rddir
taro.
:AII
0
0
ns };�
Ch.3 RABIES § 2000
§ 1921. Construction of chapter
Nothing in this chapter is intended or shall be construed to limit
the power of any city, city and county, or county in its authority in
the exercise of its police power or in the exercise of its potter under
any other provisions of law to enact more stringent requirements, to
regulate and control dogs within the boundaries of its jurisdiction.
(.added by Slats.1957, c. 1781 p. 3175, § 3.) -
§ 1922. Persons and firms to whom vaccines deliverable
Rabies vaccines for animal use shall not be supplied to other
than a veterinary biologic supply firm, a person licensed to practice
veterinary medicine under Chapter 11 (commencing with Section
4800) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or a public
agency.
(Added by Slats.1965, c. 500, P. 1434,§ 1.)
Library References
AnimNs O28 rr era C.S.S. Animate 1110 rc nen.
Article 2
ANTI -RABIC VIRUS
Sec.
20100• State distribution.
§ 2000. State distribution
The State department shall purchase or prepare, and d,stribute
free of cost, under such regulations as may be necessary, amt -rabic
virus to be used in the treatment of persons exposed to rabies when
they declaic that it would be a hardship for them to pay for anti -ra.
bic treatment.
(Stats.1939, c. 60. p. 5 2:1, § 2000.1
Mlstorieal N.Ic
nrrir4lion: 5141.,1'912, , .: :!,I. I'. Ict. 4
I.
Library (tale rencra
data., 1. C-'J. I J..,, awmal. ii 11. 75.
277
It
i ;:
l
M
6.04.010 -- 6.04.020
Title 6
ANIMALS
Chanters:
6.04 Dog Licensing and Vaccination
Sections:
Chanter 6.04
DOG LICENSING AND VACCINATION
6.04.010 Definitions.
6.04.020 Vaccination and licenses -- Required.
6.04.030 Licenses -- Places of procurement.
6.04.040 Licenses - -Fees.
6.04.050 Licenses -- Applications -- Issuance.
6.04.060 Tags -- Issuance.
6.04.070 Tags -- maintenance on dogs.
6.04.080 Leashes.
6.04.090 Vicious dogs.
6.04.100 Rabies examinations.
6.04.110 Impoundment.
6.04.120 Commercial kennels -- License requirements.
6.04.130 Commercial kennels -- Revocation of licenses.
6.04.010 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter,
unless otherwise apparent from the context, the words set
out below shall have the following meanings:
A. "Commercial kennel" means any place, other than a
private kennel, where four or more dogs over four months of
age are kept.
B. "Enforcing officer" means the city manager, the
police chief, the humane officer, the city health officer,
or such other person as the council may designate. -(Ord. 63
511 1979).
6.04.020 Vaccination and licenses-- Reouired. Each doc
o' ;er the age of four months harbored ;ai t^ n the cit-• shall be
vaccinated for rabies and licensed. The owner or harborer
o_' su_'h dog shall be required to present to the enforcing
o.:icer, upon request, a valid License and vaccination certi-
ficat•_ signed by a licensed veterinarian.. Such vacination
steal: be made each .'car unless a chick - embryo vaccine approved
b^ t:P.a State Deaart:::ent of Public Health has been river, by a
!�.: ...., ... .ctcr_narinn within two years. (Ord. 63 ;2, 1979).
9_
6.04.030 -- 6.04.100
92
i
I*
6.04.030 Licenses- - °laces of procurement. Licenses
shall be available at the license bureau in the city hall
and at the dog pound. (Ord. 63 S3, 1979).
•
6.04.040 Licenses-- ?'ees. Dog license fees are set by
resolution. (Ord. 63 44, 1979).
6.04.050 Licenses -- Applications -- Issuance. Unon the
receipt of the required license xee accompanied by an applica-
tion in writing giving the name and address of the owner or
possessor of the dog and a brief description of the dog, the
enforcing officer shall issue and deliver to such person a
license certifying the payment of such fee and setting forth
the name and address of the applicant, a brief description
of the dog, and the number allotted to the dog. (Ord. 63
95, 1979).
6.04.060 Tags - -Issuance. At the time of the issuance
of a dog license, the enforcing officer shall deliver to the
applicant for the license a metal tag which shall set forth
the date of expiration of the license. (Ord. 63 96, 1979).
6.04.070 Tacs-- rlaintenance on dogs. It is the duty of
the owner or h- arborer the aog for which a tag is issued,
to maintain such tag on such dog. (Ord. 63 S7, 1979).
6.04.080 Leashes. No person owning or harboring any
dog within the city shall permit such dog, whether licensed
or not, to be upon any public street, sidewalk, land, alley,
court, or any other public place or upon any private property ,
or premises, other than those of the person owning or having
control or custody of such dog, except when such dog is held
under by an able- bodied and competent person. (Ord. 63 S8,
1979).
6.04.090 vicious dogs. No person shall harbor or keen
any vicious dog within the city. (Ord. 63 59, 1979).
6.04.100 Rabies examinations. A. Whenever it is shown
that any dog has bitten any person, the owner or person having
the custod_r or possession of such dog shall, upon the order
of the city health officer or his authorized agent, quarantine
the dog and keep it securely chained for a period of ten
days, and shall permit the city health officer or his repre-
seneat'_vr_ to make an inspection or examination of such dog
at any time during such period. Quarantined dogs shall not
be removed from the premises without the permission of the
city healt, officer. Tha city health officer, in the interest
of proc.,c^_inq the person bitten, may order the dog quarantined
for a oeriod of twelve da;s at the owner's expense at the
cit'i :;ours or at a veterinary hospital.
92
i
I*
6.04.110 -- 6.04.130
B. The enforcing officer or any of his deputies shall
have the right to seize any dog within the city having or
suspected of having rabies and cause the same to be examined
by the city health officer, and it shall be the duty of the
city health officer to examine the dog for the purpose of
determining if such dog is afflicted with rabies.
C. If it shall be determined that such dog does not
have rabies, it shall be returned to the owner or person
harboring the dog. (Ord. 63 510, 1979).
6.04.110 Impoundment. A. It shall be the duty of the
enforcing officer to impound any dog for which a license is
required if such dog shall not be wearing the dog license
tag provided for in this article or any dog running loose
upon a public street, sidewalk, lane, alley, court, or other
public place or upon any private property or premises, other
than those of the person owning or having control or custody
of such dog, and the enforcing officer shall keep the dog
impounded until claimed, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of.
B. The owner or possessor of the dog so impounded may
reclaim such dog upon the payment of the required license
fee and ten dollars pickup fee for the first offense, fifteen
dollars pickup fee for the second offense within six months
of the first offense plus boarding fees in the amount of two
dollars for the first day and for each additional day the
dog is impounded.
C. If a dog shall have been impounded for a period of
three days and shall not have been reclaimed by the owner,
the enforcing officer may, in lieu of killing such dog, offer
the dog for adoption. The enforcing officer may, however,
with the approval of a licensed veterinarian or the State
Humane Officer, humanely destroy any impounded animal on the
same day it is impounded if the animal is in great pain or
discomfort due to an injury or infectious disease which may
contaminate and be detrimental to the health of the other
animals at the animal shelter.
D. If an impounded dog is not claimed at the expiration
of such three day period, it shall be the duty of the enforcing
officer to cause such dog to be destroyed if not otherwise
disposed of. In such event, such dog may be held for-an
additional time not to exceed ten days. (Ord. 63 511, 1979).
6.04.120 Commercial kennels -- License reauirements.
Lver•i person en a in- in the bus:aess of operating a commer-
N al i;ennel as defined in Section 6.04.010, shall obtain a
license from the license official and shall pay an ann.-'al
iicense fee for each calendar year, or part of such calendar
year. (Ord. 63 512, 1979).
5.0'.130 Commercial kennels -- Revocation of licenses.
snail hhave the power, upon giving ten
States :!ail tc any commercial kennel
I 93
6
y: r
6.04.130
licensee, to revoke any license granted to such cotunercial
kennel operator for violations of the provisions of this
chapter. (Ord. 63 513, 1979).
94
.
r'
0
•
•
V311 VL' 11AlY li11V l/V VAINVLYVA t',V�)t
MEMORANDUM��� ,
F
1L.; :T-
. _ C'•J,. — III
19%,
�r
TO: ROBERT DOUGHERTY, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: 11/5/82
FROM: SANDY HACKNEY
SUBJECT: DOBSON /SHEPHERD RANCH KENNELS
Dear Bob,
Mr. Dobson has scheduled a hearing before city council, concerning the
licensing of his individual dogs, on November 17, 1982.
1 need a formal interpretation and opinion of the law concerning this
matter. I have attached 1) the Humane Society policy developed by
Betty Fryman, General Director, 2) previous correspondence between Mr.
Dobson, Lauren Wasserman, and yourself, and 3) the entire city ordinance
concerning the licensing of dogs.
Harry has indicated to me that the report from you must be received by
us no later than Wednesday, November IOth. Please just call my office
when your interpretation is ready and I will pick it up personally to
avoid a time delay through the mail.
Bob, I am sorry this is such a rush job, but we were just notified our-
selves on Monday.
Thank you for your cooperation.
SH: bmk
Enclosures (3)
�j4
�j
YraQn OF Sacio-:r3
OF THE
�1I,L FFE3'
COMMUNITY, 7ZNG.
• ` A NON.FROFIT ORGANIZATION. INCORPORATED JUNE 1954
1010 EAST MISSION BLVD I Hw1. 601
O N T A R 1 0 C A L I F O R N I A
91761
November 4th, 1982
To: Sandy Ha:kney
From: Betty ne
714- 947 -3517
Dear Sandy:
Enclosed is what I hope will answer your questions re: Dobson's Shepherd Ranch.
Concerning the council meeting on November 17th, I plan to be there, but will
probably call you that afternoon to get some idea of where the item is on the agenda.
If diere's anything else wanted on this matter, let me know.
• --- ----
•
Our Board has met, and I outlined your idea for attempting to collect delinquent licenses
through Small Claims Court. The consensus was that we should go ahead with it, and
review hof+ productive it is after three months. We're now checking the delinquents
against current licenses. If you'd like proceed with the resolution, we'll get started
as soon as possible.
`t
1
REASON FOR A DOG LICENSE
Historically, dog licenses grew out of governmental need
to provide funds to reimburse stock raisers and farmers for
livestock killed or inlure,f by marauding dogs, coyotes, wolves,
etc. Concurrent needs included animal control officers to an-
force licensing, collect and house stray animals, investigate
claims, and handle other problems caused by animals. This
is a picture that is general throughout the United States and
other countries as well.
As the United States became more urbanized, additional
•
legislation was passed to match new problems, including the
spread of rabies in populated areas and health problems in •
disease control, cruelty and neglect, damages to private
property, traffic problems, dead animals, etc. These laws
are in federal, state, county and municiple codes.
A city is bound by animal - related codes set forth by the
county, the state and the Federal government. it has options
which allow it to make -any of those coder; stronger, but not
weakrr. Parallel situation, include education, motor vehicle
rc:;triction,, hu:ame,;:a regulation,, police and fire �,ervirec,
utc.
•
v
=a C,
2:
•
POSITION OF CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY IN GENERAL
The city is required by state law to provide animal control;
it has the option of setting up an agency within city government
or contracting with an outside agency to do this. Chaffey Humane
Society does not regulate animal control in the city; it enforces
the codes set by the Council, the County, the state and the Federal
Government under a contract with the city. The Society does not
set license fees; it collects them for the city and is accountable
to the city for using those funds to enforce the codes.
The contract between the city and the Society includes input
from the Society when code changes or revisions are under
• consideration. It is expected that the Council will want to know
the impact that such changes or revisions will make as they affect
enforceability and operating revenue.
The city provides no funds from general revenue for enforcing
the codes; it requires the Humane Society to collect the fees due
the city as spelled out in the ordinance. All surrounding cities and
counties must allocate funds from general revenue to make up the
d UTonuice between the expenses of doing animal control and the
revenue generated by dog licenses and impound fees. Chaffey
Humane is a non - profit corporation.
%J
sE6.
3.
STATUS OF KENNELS
The cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario and Montclair
require that all dogs over the age of 4 months be licensed and
vaccinated against rabies. Legal interpretation by the city
attornies and the Society's attorney is that there are no
exceptions made for dogs owned by a kennel operator. A
business license is required. When requested, the Society
works with the cities to inspect new kennels when such business
licenses are granted in order to determine if the keeping of the
animals is within sound practices. It also inspects existing kennels
•
when complaints about such kernels fall within the area of any of •
the codes that apply to animal requlations.
There is no uniformity in existing codes passed by surrounding
cities and counties where a kennel provision is included. Some
cities, such as Laverne, do not permit kennels; Los Angeles
city's kennel provisions are quite strict.
CONS IOERAI' IONS FOR CHANGES
The Society's attitude about kennel licenses Is ambivalent
at this point. Of primary consideration is the enforcement of
any changes, and coltocting the revenue due the city to finance •
3
• STATUS OF KENNELS
The cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario and Montclair
require that all dogs over the age of 4 months be licensed and
vaccinated against rabies. Legal interpretation by the city
attornies and the Society's attorney is that there are no
exceptions made for dogs owned by a kennel operator. A
business license is required. When requested, the Society
works with the cities to inspect new kennels when such business
licenses are granted in order to determine if the keeping of the
animals is within sound practices. It also inspects existing kennels
• when complaints about such kennels fall within the area of any of
the codes that apply to animal requlations.
There is no uniformity in existing codes passed by surrounding
cities and counties where a kennel provision is included. Some
cities, such as LaVerne, do not permit kennels; Los Angeles
city's kennel provisions are quite strict.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHANGES
The Society's attitude about kennel licenses is ambivalent
at thi, point. Of primary ion ,ideration is the enforcement of
any rhangc: ;, and collueting the revenue due the city to finance
17
3
STATUS OF KENNELS
The cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario and Montclair
require that all dogs over the age of 4 months be licensed and
vaccinated against rabies. Legal interpretation by the city
attornies and the Society's attorney is that there are no
exceptions made for dogs owned by a kennel operator. A
business license is required. When requested, the Society
works with the cities to inspect new kennels when such business
licenses are granted in order to determine if the keeping of the
animals is within sound practices. It also inspects existing kennels
•
when complaints about such kennels fall within the area of any of is
the codes that apply to animal requlations.
There is no uniformity in existing codes passed by surrounding
cities and counties where a kennel prevision is included. Some
cities, such as Laverne, do not permit kennels; Los Angeles
city's kennel provisions are quite strict.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHANGES
The Society's attitude about kennel licenses is ambivalent
at thi ; point. Of primary consideration is the enforcement of
any changes, and colleting the revenue due the city to finance
q •
i
a
6.
EXCERPT FROM PROPOSED UNIFORM ANIMAL CONTROL
. ORDINANCE, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE CHAFFEY COMM. INC.
DEFINITION: Commercial Kennel - shall mean any place where
four (4) or more dogs over four (4) months of age are kept for
purposes which can include, but are not limited to, boarding,
breeding, training, or marketing.
COMMERCIAL KENNELS
(a) For the purpose of this section, Sentry Dog Kennels shall
be considered as Commercial Kennels.
Permits Required
(a) No person shall operate a Commercial Kennel without first
obtaining a permit from the Enforcing Officer in compliance
with this section.
(b) The permit period shall begin with the first day of the fiscal
year and shall run for one year. Renewal applications for
• permits may be made within 60 days prior to the expiration
date. Application for a permit to establish a new animal
establishment under the provisions of this ordinance may
be made at any time.
a' •
(c) Application for Permit and annual renewal: Each applicant
for a permit shall file an application and shall pay at the time
of filing such application a non- refundable fee as set forth by
resolution adopted by the Council. An annual fee as adopted
by the Council shall be required for the renewal of a permit.
All permits issued hereunder shall be kept posted in a
conspicuous place.
(d) Every facility regulated by this ordinance shall be considered
a separate enterpri,e, requiring an individual permit.
i:;:;uance and Revocation of Permits
(n) The Enforcing Officer may refuse to issue, or revoke any
permit or license if the nerson holding the permit or license
/ ^r,
7..
refuses or fails to comply with this ordinance, the regulations
promulgated by the City, or any other law governing the protection •
and keeping of animals.
(b) If an applicant is shown to have withheld any material information
on the application, the Enforcing Officer may refuse to issue
or may revoke a permit of license.
(c) it shall be a condition of issuance of any permit for an animal
establishment that the Enforcing Officer shall be permitted to
inspect any and all animals and the premises where such animals
are kept at arry reasonable time during normal business hours.
Where a permit is revoked for any cause, or pending appeal of
any such action, the Enforcing Officer shall have power of entry
on the premises and into all areas where animals are being kept.
A person denied a permit may not reapply for a period of at
least 30 days. Each reapplication shall disclose any previous denial
or revocation and shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth by
resolution of the Council.
Rabies Vaccination
Each dog over the age of four (4) months harbored by a
Commercial Kennel shalt be vaccinated against rabies. Licensee •
shall be required to present to the Emforcing Officer upon request
a valid vaccination certificate signed by a licensed veterinarian
for each dog on the premises. Such vaccinations shall be made
each year unless a chick - embryo vaccine approved by the Depart-
ment of Public Health of the State has been given by a licensed
veterinarian within two years.
Licenses: Fees
All dogs owned by, or kept in a Commercial Kennel shall to
licensed during the period from June 1 to July 31 according to the
following formula:
(a) Number of dogs times fifty percent (50 %) of the regular
license fee for an unaltered dog.
(b) Pro -rated fees for dogs.added during the licensing year shall
be calculated according to the number of dogs times fifty
percent (50',) divided by twelve (12) times the number of months
remaining in the license year. (# dogs x 50% i 12 x # months
remaining). Each dog added during the licensing year must be
licensed under the above formula (b) within two (2) weeks of •
being acquired.
L
Penalty Fee
Any Commercial Kennel licensee who.obtains a dog license
or licenses not in conformity with any of the above provisions
shall pay a penalty fee as set forth by resolution adopted by
the Council.
ID
November 4th, 1982
To: Harry Empey, Sandy Hackney; R.C. City Hall
•
From: Betty Fryman, Chaffey Human
Re: Dobson's Shepherd Ranch Kentels, 8694 Hickory
S6ject kennels were visited twice on November 3rd, 1982; apparently no one was
at home either time, although a telephone check of the residence was answered by a
recorded message that the Dobsons were in the kennel.
Contact was made at 9:03 a.m. , November 4th by the general manager Betty Fryman
and Humane Officer Tedd Nickerson, Jr. Mrs. Dobson admitted both officers to the
. kennel area, which is completely enclosed by chain link fence laced through with slats
on the south and west sides to obscure a view of the dogs. Rough sketch appended.
Tea German Shepherd dogs over the age of 4 months were counted. Thase appear to
coordinate with current licenses. List and descriptions appended.
Four German Shepherds under the age of 4 months were counted . Two were in a sepa -
rate pen; their ages were given by Mrs. Dobson to be 11 weeks with which the officers
agree. Two more puppies were with the bitch "Jealousies' Mrs. Dobson gave their ages
as 8 weeks, with which the officers also agree.
-------- --------- ------
•
Both Mr. and Mrs. Dobson were courteous and cooperative with the officers, who ex-
plained that they were conducting an investigation at the request of City Hall in conjunction
with the Dobson's questions about a provision for kennel licenses.
All of the animals viewed appeared to be in optimum health, and were kenneled in clean,
dirt runs with more than adequate space and shelter, considering the size of the breed.
An electric shock device was attached to the perimeter fence facing an empty field which
would act as a deterrent should the adult dogs attempt to tunnel out; an auxiliary fence
to the east separates the kennel dogs from a grassy enclosed area to the rear of the house.
The front fences are marked with "Gua•d Dog" signs, although approved signs for poten-
tially vicious dogs were not displayed at regular intervals.
It is the opinion of the officers that, except for dirt flooring in the pens, the operators
are providing excellent care. Some question about how these pens would be affected by
rainy weather remains; drainage could be a problem, which could leave the dogs no refuge
from mud except for the dog houses .
•
:g
ZuPPLcMeNT *1
0
Two /1 -week
plu pt
jkM56
Je�1a�s,e' LA2C�' 'Sho. *c k" (GwwJ )
Two 9 wt CRosq S Jesew"
P °Pp,et
bob 50h S Shy h evcl
ICChn2I5
£ (� ICJCOvy Ka �cC o
Gwc &rn awl a,
Noverrt4- `4, (96,Z
t Orll
NOT 10 SGT
0
16 f
.Tr
O
V
V
Supplement -42
•
Dobson Shapherd Ranh
8694 Hickory
Rancho Cucamonga
82 -83 Lic. #
Name
Age
Sex
Color
10006
Stormy
3= yrs.
Male
Black & Tan
10007
Rosa
1 yr.
Female
Black & Tan
10008
Eli
72 yrs.
Male
Black & Tan
10009
Peggy
2 yrs.
Female
Black & Tan
10010
Lazer
2 yrs.
Male
Slack & Tan •
10011
Lori
32 yrs.
Female
Black & Tan
10012
Jezabel
42 YS -
Female
Black & Red
10013
Jealousie
412 yrs.
Female
Black & Red
10014
Princess
4q yrs.
Female
Black & Tan
10015
Shamrock
3Z ys.
Male
Black & Tan
0
�.�` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z
` 'C' w.., lon D. 1likela
JcP .5 198Z
•% �CL �'• i,Z Ch.'ks.I. Requel it James C. Fmsl
C I,j Richard AI. Dahl Phillip 11. ScNh,saer
September 14, 1982
Mr. s Mrs. Joseph Dobson
Shepherd Rancho Kennels
8694 Hickory Road
Fontana, California 92335
Dear Mr. 6 Mrs. Dobson:
As indicated in my letter of August 30, 1982, I have asked the city attorney
to review both State and local laws concerning the question of whether dogs
kept in a breeding kennel must be individually licensed.
The city attorney has concluded that both the State law and City of Rancho
. Cucamonga ordinances require the individual licensing of dogs kept at your
kennel.
E
Now that the legal questions raised by you previously have been determined
by our city attorney. We will anticipate your cooperation in folla+ing the
existing State and local ordinances.
Sincerely,
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
G4W:baa
cc: Ci C/ Council
Harry Emcay
H u:,ta nc Society
Robert Dougherty
912011ASELI%EROAD.SUITEC r POST OFFICE BOX 807• RA\ CIIOCI ;CA .NIO\G.I.CAI.IFOR \L191t00 • (71E90.189I
f ( CJ �aephel °d (JR,a>7.ch �Xelllle/s
AKC RLG/STERED GERMAN SHEPHERD DOGS
Champion Bloodline, Since 1952
•' ' '''
PnpDin Smd ddnitr Tra Lig
JOSLPII and JOAN HOIISOS
,•', , 8'JH Hk':.,Y
Fomana• C.Nwrnia 922333
Plum, (7141 :122.4411
July 20, 1982
Fr. Phil Schlosser, Favor
Schlosser Forge Company
11711 Arrow Route
CucamonSa, CA. 91730
Dear Fayor Schlosser:
As you will recall, I was in your office on several previous
occassions to discuss the matter relating to pry being charged individual
dog license fees by the Humane Society for my dogs at my kennel.
I showed you paperwork obtained from the county, which explained
Procedures, based on State Law, governing vaccinating and licensing of
• dogs--individually owned and /or boarded as well as blank i
et licensng
of breedi.nS kennels.
r1
U
I also showed you my State Seller's Permit, State advertising permits
and Fanc: .no Cucamonga license for my dos kennel. You made copies of this
material and advised me you would take care of this matter and I would
no lonppr be required to buy individual dog licenses as it would operate
the same as the ccunty, which is in accordance with State law.
I have, on this date, received a notice from the Chaffee District
Humanc Society in (..`Mario, CA. that I ant again being required to buy
individual licenses for Pitch of my dogs. I telephnned this office
iraediaely and spoke to Bette Bos.;aan, keens` -a, nanager, and Petty Frylaan,
manager. They told me. thth =ir procedure is based on State law and requires
each individual dog to bo i.icensed whether it is in a kennel or not.
Sinilar to previous occasions, as a basis for their arg;um�nt, they again
told ::_ G'- adhsvcn Kenn-! ?r. Ontario has licenses for 127 dogs.
Gla:ihaven Kennel is a be:rr,lin- ken_inl housing nri vatnl•✓ ov-1ed doffs
o.mcr:.,. -I have spoken to this kennel_ann was Lola their
bw;i77s, is ooarnin; dogs and they only have a 1'ew small -brood dogs of
their o:m. Check their yellow pmt:e directory ad in the phone book and you
will ape for yourself.
%d? h,�C !fell �UL22 19.12
State law requiring licensing of dogs is intended for the purpose
of insuring dogs are vaccinated against Rabies and consequently has •
been administered through Calif. Health Depts. Hoarding kennels are
required to have proof of rabies vaccination on file for each dog owner's
dog they are boarding.
Then the county relinquished the area of which I am located on the
borderline, I was told to contact 1•r. Cass Schrieb of the Humane Society,
who would be handling kennel licenses for the new city. I did so and
Mr. Schrieb informed me there would be no changes except that I would
obtain my kennel license from the city hall instead of the County Health
Dept. The only comment the Humane Society will make on this is "hi.
Schrieb is no longer here." This implies that whoever is managing their
office dictates procedures (which are proclaimed to be based on State law)
but are contradictory.
My business is breeding and selling dogs. My city license if for
a dog kennel. I should not be required to buy a license for a kennel
.from the city as well as individual licenses for each dog.'
Yost other kennels or persons selling dogs do not have a State Seller's
Permit. And they do not have to pay sales tax. Some may buy individual
dog licenses but they do not also any the city for a license. Some call
themselves "hobbyists" but engage in the sane practice of selling dogs.
Right on my street another place has several dogs which run all over
the street. They raise Dobermans and don't have a kennel license or
charge sales tax as I must do. Across the street - -200 or 300 feet a:vay,
•
which is in the county; there are two or three places that frequently
have signs hung out advertising dogs for sale. I have to compste with
such other people. And no doubt my neighbors receive some of the benefit
of my advertising.
By being required to have a State Seller's Permit, pay sales tax on
each dog sold, pay the city a license tax for my kennel and the St mane
Society another license tar on each dog, my dogs are being, taxed t w death.
Double or triple taxing an item, whether it is a dog or a piece of general
merchanaise, is nei-her lc §ai r.-- acccptable.
These arbitrary procedures are contrary to the law applying to
breedin; kennels and are dis.:rininatory when other indi raduals can offer
oo;;s for sale and do not have to comply with nor nay all thzse license
tax f..es.
I•rs. Fryman informed me that if I refuse to pay a fee of .515 per dog
prior to tho end of this montn, she intends to charge me 4;25 per do...
As .ayir of the City of .oancho Cw_amon;;a, I wish to hereby formally
re�is t:r ry protest cn this nntirn matter with you and request a hearing,
if necewary.
J AD/ 4 tJ Respectfully ours,
•
�. v u Joseph A, Dobson
City of
NCH0
• CUCAMONGA
December t'.), 1980
Joseph and Joan Dobson
8694 Hickory
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91739
RE: Shepherd Ranch Kennels
8694 Hickory
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91739
near x. . and Mrs. Dobson:
Mayor Schlosser has asked me to respond to your questions regarding the
Chaffey Mumane Society's request that you license each adult dog in your
kennel.
Section 1920(a) of the California State Health and Safety Code requires
the licensing of all dogs beginning at four (4) months of age. Rancho
• Cucamonga City Ordinance No. 14, Section 2 reinforces this law by
stating that "each dog over the age of four (4) months harbored within
the City shall be vaccinated for rabies and licensed." The City contracts
with the Chaffey Humane Society to enforce this particular ordinance.
Since one of your concerns was that under San Bernardino County you had
a "blanket" license which covered all of the dogs in your kennel, we
checked with other kennels in this area and found that in the cities
of Ontario, Upland, and Chino individual licenses are purchased for each
dog.
It would seem, then, that the Humane Society's request is within the
boundaries of both State and City law, and therefore should he complied
with.
1 he;•a that we have been able to adequately address your concerns regarding
t:.:: „atto:. Siuuld y.,u hag additional questions, please don't ha_,itate
to c„i.tact Cla.:iia Mon,man of our Finance Department.
Sincerely,
Lauren 17. Wasserman
• City Mananger
CC,/ a
C:JI:
POST OFFICE BOX 607, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714) 9591951
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
! r.,..Jon D. Mil;cls
Charles J. Duquet II lames C Fmst
fit—., j Richard Al. Dahl Philliv D. $ EP Igg,82
1977 C
August 30, 1982
u:. .
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Dobson
Shepherd Rancho Kennels
8694 Hickory
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dobson:
Your letter dated July 20th and addressed to former Mayor Phil Schlosser has
been referred to me for research and a response.
Because we have been dealing with this issue for several years, I think it
best that I forward your letter along with all previous correspondence to
o4r city attorney for review. As soon as I have an answer for you, I will
respond.
Please accept my apology for the late response to your letter. It was in
my correspondence which was received while I was on vacation.
Sincerely,
IL
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
LhPd:baa (8- 31 -82)
cc: Jon Mikels
City Attorney
'3
9320 BASELINE ROAD. SATE. C • PDST 01TICE MA W MANOR) CALIFORNIA 91730 • (711)9!9.18:1
•
L
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: September 13, 1982
RF: Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Dobson (Shepherd Rancho Kennels).
Reference is made to correspondence concerning the ques-
tion of whether dogs kept in a breeding kennel must be individ-
ually licensed.
It is our conclusion that both state law and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga ordinances require the individual licensing of
dogs so kept.
•
RED:sgg
Enclosures
•
,j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9
r.r..Jon D. Mikds
c `-v,, �Vl jib c"' °"^"^• •
Cbrtkh. J. . DA II Jnmo Frosl
t-'W Ij
Richard M. >7. DaAI Phillip D.
SaAlnsxr
-� IYiT
October 15, 1982
RED
ty�
Shepherd Ranch Kennels uC %18 1982
8694 Hickory
Fontana, CA 92335
Attention: Joseph Dobson
Dear Mr. Dobson:
In response to your most recent letter making reference to Section
30807 of the Food and Agricultural Code, I have asked the City
Attorney to review that law. Your contention was that you were not
required to obtain an individual license for each dog at your kennel.
Unfortunately, our City Attorney does not agree with your interpretation.
It is his view that Section 30807 only permits a local government body
the option to exempt kennels from individual license fees. In the case
of Rancho Cucamonga this option was not elected. The City has chosen to
require an individual license for all dogs including those kept at a •
kennel.
I hope that with this most recent interpretation by our City Attorney
the issue has at last been put to rest. We have been discussing this
point for several years now. Incidentally, this interpretation is
consistent with other agencies within the Chaffey Humane Society
Jurisdiction.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
L Wasserman .
City Manager
LF1'd /mk
cc: City Council
Bob Dougherty
Chofhry humane Society
Harry Empey
11
9020DA3ELI\I7ROAD,8t•ITKC • POSTOYPICEBO %907 • RA \CII4)CUCAMD\CA,CALIFOS\IA91700 s 17171999•ISSI
`�; f• G hebherd 9?andi. Ofennels
ARC REGISTERED GERMAN SHEPHERD DOGS
T' Qumgon bloodline+ Since 17:?
Si ` „Ylw/;Y1"� 1'nf0i:+ • J1.d .f ir: ia: AdW;. 7'ruwwq
.4 JOSIi I'il an.I JOAN DOUSV.0
WIN Hick,,,
Po ns, C:dw.,ni. 112335
Ph.,,, (714, "'- Lit
Uctober 10, 1942
a�u•er. e.. ;aszermari
City d:anager
City oI' 9.anchc UuCasanga
..0. nor d07
rancho Cucamonga U. 91730
.:ear ::r. 4uasserman:
.,s you will recall+ i wrote you on Uctober 1+ 1942 and forwarded a copy of
tae State .,,aw regarding licensing of dogs.
Since previous discussion •.rite certain city members concerning the unreasonbie
fees the city has caused to be levied against try business have been
unproductive+ 1 wish to obtain a hearing on the matter.
"ii:e scape oat excuse rendered ,a has repeatedly been blaeed to State law:
xnich is not only inaccurate but deceptive and has been a whitewash for
• ;.u, -tane Society oenefitr to the disadvantage and explottation of my business.
ion :ma Cit, and all points east handle kennel licensinS similar to the Uount?.
unsin -.ass licenses are reouired but not individual licensing of each dog.
i wish to obtain a hearing to regnest the city ordinance be amended to become
con,ruent vita County ordinance and State law.
the individual licensing proceaure is an inequitable and undue expense for a
kennel raisLif and sellin :� do,s. It aoelies to puns reaching the age of h
montns and wes intended for individual dog owners for the purpose or insuring
individuals inoculate their doh. This annual tax on each dog for puppy
reaching the ege of a months) is now 615 and 1 understand the Humana Society
intenria to increase it to w25 per dog or pup.
1 r n be r,.: f arced to severrly JAndt the. munber of puypies raised since 1
carrentl•• rnuld he pl,,ced in W. nosition of having; to pay these exhoroitnnt
on Lar 'n nivmers of puns not so1.I prior to the ale of s nont'as.
ti: on no's ,rl:wam e in .n cnnnromioine and unfairly uncompetitive
nosition, ,. to otner Rennaia crit:dn a :mr blocks of ...y nennel which are not
a +nstrwa ,, u :n this : ^nnner :inn it is tneroby d:rma;;ia; to my business.
cc: Ult: ;bunci: Yo(u•n trr(LLv, /
...,vor ,.0% ..L .1.1i ��1�!/7C( L• �I"ljry �.
DATE August 26, 1982 INTER- OFFICE MEMO
iu�x umnaam,
FROM Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE � II,p `�;
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station
TO Lauren, Slasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT Creation of Senior Deputy Position
Recently the Sheriff's Office was successful in upgrading 20
positions throughout the Sheriff's Office to a Senior Deputy
classification effective January, 1983. This classification
is new and affords the Sheriff's Office tremendous flexibility
in the assignment of manpower.
In gaining these new classifications, the contract cities
were not considered. I have been instructed by Dndersheriff
Tidwell to negotiate with the City, the number of Senior Deputy
positions needed.
The Senior Deputy position has long been overdue, not only for
this Station, but the entire Sheriff's Office. Although the
position is of a supervisorial nature, the City does not lose
• a patrolman for a "desk jockey." The City gains an immediate
field working supervisor (in the absence of the Watch Commander),
while still maintaining the same number of field officers on
patrol.
The evaluation of Rancho needs indicate that three positions
need to be upgraded. The officers would be compensated at
the same rate as Detectives and a slight increase to our con-
tract cost would result.
Cost Breakdown:
$25,891.20 (Deputy Salary) + 10.24% (Percent
Increase) _ $2,651.00 per year
$2,651.00 ; 2 (six months) = $1,325.00 per
six months
t $1,325.00 x 3 positions = $3,977.00
TOTAL CONTRACT INCREASE . . . . . $3,977.00
Justification:
The purpose in requesting three Senior Deputies is to place one
on each shift throughout the day. Obviously, from time to time,
there will be no Senior Deputy on shift due to illness, vacation,
training, schools, days off, etcetera. However, on those occa-
sions the shift schedule will ensure that a regular Watch Command-
er will be on duty.
12. 1061-000 R.. 1 /11 J f
Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
August 26, 1982
Page Two
It should be pointed out that a Senior Deputy position for each of •
the three shifts per day is in no way an attempt to fatten the
administration or lessen the duties and responsibilities of the
station Watch Commander on duty. The Senior Deputy will, at times,
supplement the duty Watch Commander on those occasions when both
are on duty at the same time. The primary reason for the creation
of this position was not to supplement the Watch Commander's posi-
tion, but to augment the supervision of the station in the absence
of a Watch Commander and to be utilized as a training officer.
This station presently has six sergeants, Two of the sergeants
are removed from the patrol capacity. One directly supervises the
station detectives and the other supervises the Record Bureau
personnel, as well as being responsible for the grants, traffic
enforcement and the traffic and criminal statistics. The remain-
ing four sergeants are assigned to patrol. There is one for each
of the three shifts and the remaining one is for relief. It is
quite obvious that when a sergeant is removed from patrol for any
given period of time, coupled with vacations, days off, training,
illnesses, etcetera, the three remaining sergeants cannot be
assigned to supervise all shifts. A Senior Deputy would cover
these gaps if one were to be assigned to each of the three shifts
each day. These positions are not additions, but rather upgrading
of present personnel at a 10 percent salary increase.
Training •
The Senior Deputy will be the field training officer
for all Academy deputies routinely assigned to this
station for periods of three months at a time and
will act as a liaison between this station and the
Academy Staff.
The Senior Deputy will also be responsible for train-
ing all newly assigned deputy personnel transferring
to the Rancho Cucamonga Substation for field assign-
ment.
C. This position will also be utilized to assist the
Watch Commander in on -going field training of station
personnel.
Supervision
The Senior Deputy will serve as an alternate super-
visor and coordinator at major traffic accident and
crime scene investigations ma when the shift (watch)
commander is called away or unavailable on other
emergencies requiring his immediate presence. ••
Presently when the Watch Commander is on vacation, •
sick, etcetera the responsibility for the watch is
relinquished to the most senior deputy on shift.
The field deputy then has the added burden of
)r5
Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
August 26, 1982
Page Three
• supervising and coordinating the entire shift
(with the authority, but without the rank and
hampered by peer pressurel as well as perform-
ing his regular patrol duties. The addition
of the Senior Deputy position would alleviate
this on -going problem.
3. Flexibility
a. The rank of detective (which ultimately will be
phased out) and that of Senior Deputy are one in
the same. This allows for lateral movement from
a patrol function to investigations without pro-
motion or demotion, which is what is required at
present without the position of a Senior Deputy.
4. Morale
a. As indicated previously, the lateral movement of
a Senior Deputy from patrol to investigations is
now available. This lateral movement is a great
morale booster for those deputies about to be
promoted, affording them the opportunity of work-
ing in uniform or plain clothes investigations as
a detective.
• b. As time goes on, a senior patrolman may elect to
move from plain clothes to uniform or vice versa..
This is not only a morale factor for the individual,
but provides a broader base of experience for the
deputies. The former plain clothesman is now
charges with training. The lateral movement of
the Senior Deputy from patrol to investigations
will also provide new insight to plainclothesmen
in their overall manner of conducting field contact
and investigations.
T4� c
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 10, 1982
To: City Council and City Manager
From Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department
Subject: Park Advisory Committee Discussion continued from
Council Meeting of November 3, 1982
At your last meeting, Council indicated that it was strongly inclined
toward appointing a 'sub- committee of or a 'committee from' the
membership of the Citizens Advisory Commission to study and make
recommendations to the Council on park related issues. Council directed
staff to return to Council with an appropriate Ordinance and /or
recommendations on how this could be best accomplished.
Bob Dougherty, Jim Robinson and myself met November 8th to discuss the
item and formulate a report on how to best address Councils concerns.
First, if Council elects to go with a 'sub- committee of or a ' committee
from' the CAC, an Ordinance would not be required... minute action would
suffice, expressing Council wishes and specific direction.
Second, if Council wishes to have the issue of CAC 'sub- committees' or
'committees' embodied within a formal Ordinance, perhaps it may be more
appropriate to incorporate the language in the CAC Ordinance slated for
review by Council in December. It could read like this:
"Section Committees (or S:lb- Committees)
The City Council may appoint specified Committees (or
Sub - Committees) from the Citizens Advisory Commission to study
areas of specific interest...."
Third, backing up a bit, and while it may be 'splitting hairs' the
difference should be recognized between a 'sub - committee to' and a
'committee from'. A 'sub - committee to' implies that the group would
report to and be subserviant to the CAC. A 'committee from' could be a
free - standing committee reporting to the Council, if that be your
direction, made up from individnnls who also happen to be, as a
prerequisite, members of the CAC. It may sound like a matter of
semantics, but it is important...who will the PAC report to, the Council
or the CAC?
Fourth, during the previously mentioned staff discussion, pro and con
items regarding 'back to back' CAC /PAC maetings were brought forth to
complete the picture for Council on the issue. Some of those items are
as follows:
Park Advisory Committee Discussion
Page 2
PRO 'Back to Back'
1. Reduced mailing Cost;
2. One agenda preparation;
3. Some reduction in duplication of staff time expenditure at
meetings.
CON 'Back to Back'
1. Five member appointed Committee meeting would likely become a
meeting of the full CAC by 'early arrivals' or 'stay afters'
depending which side of the CAC meeting the PAC was attached;
2. One group or the other, again depending upon scheduled meeting
sequence, may be restricted in topic discussions due to time
constraints.
Summarizing, COUNCIL OPTIONS could include the following:
1. Through minute action, Council can appoint a five member
committee (or however many members Council wishes) to examine,
discuss and make recommendations to Council on issues related
to parks;
2. The Committee can be made up entirely of CAC members, or a
combination of CAC and Non -CAC members; •
3. The Committee can be a free - standing Committee to the Council
or a Sub- Committee to the CAC.
4, The Committee can meet 'back to heck' with CAC or on a separate
day and time.
In Conclusion, the combined STAFF COMMENTS on the above options are as
follows:
1. If the study group is to report to Council directly,
consideration should be given to making it a 'Committee' rather
than a CAC 'Sub - Committee';
2. If the study group is to include both CAC and Non -CAC members,
it may also be prudent to create a free - standing 'Committee'
rather than a CAC 'Sub- committee';
3. If the Council wishes to have the Committee or Sub- Committee
meet 'back to back' with CAC, Council may wish to review the
operational logistics after several months of this practice to
evaluate the concept and make adjustments if any are necessary.
The concept of 'back to hack' works very well with
Redevelopment /Council as the membership of each body is the
same, however, with the CAC /PAC it may require testing the
principle over several months to get accurate reading on any •
unforeseen complications.
Park Advisory Committee Discussion
Page 3
iWe hope this addresses the issues and provides the type of analysis the
Council requested. If more information is required, please advise.
�mIU-)
WLH:nm
u
9
I "' ii
A,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 15, 1982 C
a
To: City Council and City Manager "I__-
1977
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department
Subject: Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 105 (Chapeter 16.31 _
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code re: Park Dedication)
Find attached the Ordinance prepared by the City Attorney's Office, along
with a cover memorandum, for the purposes of implementing the Foran Bill.
Supportive Resolution regarding both the "P" and "D" Factors will be
presented before Council at your December 15 meeting, these Resolutions
to be effective January 1, 1983.
BH /mw
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: November 12, 1982
RE: Park Dedication Ordinance No. 105
Enclosed please find a proposed Ordinance amending Chapter
16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to implement the
restrictive provisions of the Foran Bill for tentative maps and
parcel maps which are approved or conditionally approved after
December 31, 1982.
Based upon Youngblood -vs- Board of Supervisors, 22 Cal.3d
644, 150 Cal.Rptr. 242 (1978) and E1 Patio -vs- Permanent Rent
Control Board, 110 Cal.App.3d 915, 168 Cal.Rptr. 276 (1980), we
are of the opinion that the standards for park development pre-
sently in effect apply in those cases where the tentative map or
parcel map is approved or conditionally approved on or before
December 31, 1982. Thus, we do not propose amending Chapter 16.32
so as to disturb those existing standards. However, Section 4 of
the Ordinance has been included in case the Court later, disagrees
with our conclusion.
The City Council should also adopt a resolution establishing
"P" factors for each class of household. The resolution should be
applicable to tentative maps and parcel naps approved or conditionally
approved after December 31, 1982. In our opinion the City must
utilize the 1979 census breakdown for classes of household inasmuch
f
the 1980 federal census did not provide such information.
Please call me if you have any questions concerning the
enclosed.
RED: sjo
Enclosure
iL
ORDINANCE NO. ,�y�r`�'J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI -I y
FORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCA- b
MONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK AND RECREATION
LAND, INCLUDING SAVINGS PROVISIONS,
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended by amending Section 16.32.010 to read as
follows:
"Sec. 16.32.010. Intent and General Provisions.
"The intent of this chapter is to provide for
the development of park and recreational facilities
through subdivision regulations, in an area where the
need for parks has been determined. Each subdivider
of land for residential use, shall, as a condition to
the approval of a tentative map, parcel map, planned
community, land development or real estate development,
dedicate lands or pay fees in lieu thereof, or a com-
bination of both, for neighborhood and community park
or recreational purposes. Lard to satisfy dedication
requirements shall be conveyed to the City at the time
of recordation of the final map or parcel map. In
lieu fees shall be paid to the City prior to the issu-
ance of building permits. ".
SECTION 2: Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended by adding Subsection J to Section 16.32.020
to read as follows:
"(J) Notwithstanding any other provisions in this
chapter to the contrary, for tentative maps and parcel
maps approved or conditionally approved after December
31, 1982 the amount of land dedicated or fees paid shall
be based upon the residential density, which shall be
determined on the basis of the approved or conditionally
approved tentative map or parcel map and the average
household size and shall be the proportionate amount
necessary to provide three acres of park area per one
thousand persons residing within such subdivision. For
the purposes of applying the formula found in subsection
F of this section to such subdivisions, 5 equals three
and P shall be the average size of each class of house-
hold within such subdivision. If any such subdivision
contains more than one class of household, a separate
computation using the formula in subsection F of this
section shall be made for each class of household within
such subdivision and the 'minimum fee'for the separate
calculations shall be added together to determine the
minimum fee for the subdivision as a whole for the
purpose of determining dedication requirements. ".
SECTION 3: Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended by adding Subsection G to Section 16.32.030
to read as follows:
"(G) Planned developments and real estate devel-
opments as defined in Sections 11003 and 11003.1,
respectively, of the California Business and Professions
Code, shall be eligible to receive a credit, in an
amount determined by resolution of the City Council,
against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or
the amount of the fee imposed, pursuant to this chapter,
for the value of private open space within the develop-
ment which is useable for active recreational uses.
This subsection shall apply only to planned developments
and real estate developments for which tentative maps
or parcel maps are approved or conditionally approved
after December 31, 1982. The credit allowable pursuant
to this subsection shall, if applied for, be in lieu of
any other credit allowable under other provisions of
this chapter. ".
SECTION 4: Notwithstanding any other provision of State law
or ordinance or resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in the
event of a final judicial determination that any fee or dedication
requirement imposed by Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muni-
cipal code, either as it existed prior to the effective date of
this ordinance, or as amended by this ordinance, is in excess of
the maximum permitted by State law, such fee or dedication require-
ment, or both, shall be deemed reduced to and fixed at the maximum
quantity or amount that the Court determines might have been law-
fully imposed by the City pursuant to an ordinance adopted under
the authority of California Government Code Section 66477.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby declares that it would
have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or
portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for
any reason any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared invalid
or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain
in full force an(! effect.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City
clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at
least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation,
published in thr Crty of Oneario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
-2-
1982
ATTEST:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
-3-
Mayor
CAL— A,. t ASS .L ue ALL
SMALL CLAIMS COURT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO LICENSING.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
resolve as follows:
In order to comply with the requirements of the municipal small
claims court of the County of San Bernardino, it is necessry to name certain
individuals as those persons authorized to sign court documents as required on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
THEREFORE, the following named individuals are authorized to sign all
necessary court documents relating to licensing:
Sandra D. Hackeny Business License Inspector
Betty M. Ring Clerk Typist
Harry J. Empey Finance Director
Betty Fryman Director, Chaffey Humane Society
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: 4
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 12, 1982
To: City Council
From: Finance Dire ctyr
Subject: Small Claims Court Signature Designee's
O CyICAMO,,�c
to
6 x
With a change in Personnel it becomes necessary to change
the names of those individuals who have the responsibility of
signing small claims court documents.
With this latest change, we are requesting that Betty
Fryman's name be added to the list for purposes of putting teeth
into their program of enforcement against those refuse to purchase
a dog license. Several thousand dollars have been lost over the
years due to the fact that the Humane Society has not had the
capability of strong enforcement. The small claims court mechanism,
recommend by Sandra Hackney of the Finance Department staff, is being
implemented to assist the Humane Society in recovering fees here
to fore lost. Also, should reduce the pressure on cities to provide
a subsidy to the Humane Society for enforcement activities on behalf
of the cities.
1977
STAFF REPORT'S
9
z. 1�
�i
DATE: November 17, 1982 _
TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency 1977
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF BOND COUNSEL FOR HOUSING MORTGAGE REVENUE
BOND PROGRAM
Interviews were held for bond counsel on Monday, November 8, 1982.
Several of the most prestigious law firms experienced in housing
mortgage bonds were invited to attend the interview. A list of those
firms is attached with this report. The interview panel included the
financial advisor and members of the RDA staff. The interview panel
unanimously recommended the law firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White as
the bond counsel firm. Attached is a copy of their proposal. The
interview panel based their interview on the following categories of
interest: (1) expertise; (2) experience; (3) job performance; and, (4)
fee structure. The firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White proved to be
outstanding in all the categories for the following reasons:
EXPERTISE: The firm provides a broad range of expertise in diversified
areas of both the bond counsel field and tax advisor as it applies to
federal and state tax laws. The principal cooridinators of this
project, Sharon White and Andrew Hall, have attended national and state
committees and are prominent in their respective fields of tax advisor
and legal counsel.
EXPERIENCE: The firm has acted as bond counsel on a broad range of
housing bond issues for cities in Southern California and other parts of
the state (see attached). Their firm has dealt with many different
underwriting firms and has a good working relationship with them. The
firm, through its experience, also has had considerable contact with the
State Allocation Committee and members of their staff. The firm thus
has the desirable ability to work quickly and smoothly with the various
parties necessary to bring the issues to fruition.
JOB PERFORMANCE: The firm has the capability of providing
computer- assisted financial analysis to check estimates prepared by the
underwriter, can provide necessary follow up after the bond sale, and
can assure a quick response time on all legal opinions necessary to
Selection of Bond Counsel
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
November 17, 1982
Page 2
complete the bond issue. The principals have stressed the importance of
providing Rancho Cucamonga with the highest level of service in order to
establish a good working relationship with the City.
FEES: The bond counsel fee structure is similar to those of the other
respondents and a ceiling has been negotiated at $95,000. Because of
the sliding scale fee schedule, the final compensation will be dependent
upon the final size of the issue; however, it would not exceed
$95,000. Further, the fee is contingent upon the successful sale of the
bond issue. Should the bond issue not be completed for any reason,
nothing would be charged for the services of the bond counsel.
Attached for your review is a copy of the agreement for services to be
executed between the bond counsel and the RDA. This agreement has been
reviewed by general counsel. Briefly, the services of this agreement
include: (1) attending meetings of the Agency, other administrative
groups as well as the development community; (2) participation in the
selection of financing methods for the bond issue; (3) preparation of
all ordinances, resolutions, notices, developer agreements, and other
documents necessary for proceedings; (4) to review and comment on the
official statement; (5) preparation of a receipt for the sale of the
bonds; (6) assemblance of complete transcripts; and, (7) consultation
during the period of the loan servicing as necessary.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency select
the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White as bond counsel for the Housing
Mortgage Revenue Bond issue and authorize the Chairman to execute the
agreement. No RDA funds are necessary, compensation would be from the
bond issue.
Respectfully Zub itted,
JACK LAM, AI CP -"
Community Development Director
JL:TJB:jr
Attachments: List of Firms
Consultant Proposal
Bond Counsel Agreement
MORTGAGE BOND COUNSEL FIRMS INTERVIEWED
Best, Best and Krieger
4200 Orange Street
P. 0. Box 1028
Riverside, CA 92502
Jones, Hall, Hill and White
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Stradling, Yocca, Carlson and Rauth
610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 800
Union Bank Building
P. 0. Box 7680
Newport Beach, CA 92600
Brown and Nazarek
2171 Campus Drive, Suite 330
Irvine, CA 92715
A G R E E M E N T
FOR SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROCEEDING
REDEVELOPMENT MORTGAGE LOANS
(5699)
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 17th day of November, 1982, by and between
the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic
(the "Agency ") and JONES HALL HILL & WHITE, A Professional Law Corporation, San
Francisco, California ( "Attorneys ").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Agency is undertaking a residential mortgage financing program
(the "Program ") within its redevelopment project area and proposes to finance the
costs thereof by a Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond proceeding under Chapter 8
(commencing wsith Section 33750) of Part 1 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety
Code of the State of California (herein called "SB99 ");
WHEREAS, Attorney are experienced in municipal and municipal bond law and in
the conduct of proceedings for accomplishing such a Program and conducting
financing proceedings therefor under S899; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by
this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, as follows:
1. Description of Legal Services. The legal services that the Attorneys
shall provide are as follows:
(a) Confer and consult with the administrative staff of the Agency and
with its consultants and underwriters as to any matters relating to the financing.
(b) Participate in the selection of financing methods through
discussion and consultation with the Agency and its consultants and underwriters.
(c) Attend such meetings of the Agency and any administrative meetings
or committee meetings at which any financing proceedings are to be discussed for
the proper planning of the proceedings.
(d) Prepare all ordinances, resolutions, indentures, notices, leases
and legal documents necessary for the proper conduct of proceedings for the purpose
of financing the Program or parts thereof.
underwriters (e) Review any official statement prepared by the Agency's
(f) Prepare and provide a receipt for the sale of the securities, a
receipt for the proceeds thereof, a signature and no- litigation certificate and any
and all other closing documents required to accompany the delivery of the
securities.
(g) Assemble and provide a complete transcript of the conduct of the
financial proceedings necessary to accompany the delivery of the securities.
(h) Subject to completion of proceedings to Attorneys satisfaction,
provide the legal opinion of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law
Corporation, approving in all regards the legality of all proceedings for the
authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the securities, or other transactions
relating to the financing, and the exemption of interest from Federal and State
personal income taxation in accordance with applicable regulations.
(i) Confer and consult with the Agency officials with regard to
problems which may arise during the period of servicing and payment of the
securities.
(j) Apply for and obtain any rulings from the Internal Revenue Service
regarding the tax - exempt status of the interest on the securities, if necessary.
(k) Provide any other services commonly expected of bond counsel and
not set forth above.
2. Responsibility for the Program. The direct responsibility for the
Program will be undertaken by Andrew C. Hall with tax assistance from Sharon
Stanton White.
3. Compensation. Fees for legal services rendered with respect to the
Program shall be as follows:
1120% of the first $5,000,000 of securities sold, plus 1/4% of the next
$15,000,000 of securities sold, plus 1 /10% of any amount of securities sold over
$20,000,000, but in no event to exceed an aggregate amount of $95,000.
Said fees would be payable from the proceeds of the financing and not
otherwise.
In addition to the above, Attorneys shall be reimbursed (solely from the
proceeds of the financing) for costs advanced on behalf of the Agency, expenses for
travel outside of California, costs of special messenger and delivery services and
closing costs.
9
4. Exceptions. The following services are excepted from the services to
be rendered for such percentage fees:
a. Any computer services for verification of cash flow schedules
relating to the Program.
b. Any services required in obtaining Federal, State or other
subventions or loans other than a sale and delivery of municipal securities to any
Federal or State agency.
For any such services which Attorneys are directed to render for and on
behalf of the Agency, compensation shall be on a reasonable fee basis to be agreed
upon.
5. Scope of Employment. It is intended that this Agreement apply only to
the first series of securities issued for the Program. The Agency is not obligated
to but neither is it precluded from employment of Attorneys to handle subsequent
series of securities.
It is understood that this Agreement may be terminated by either party on
reasonable notice to the other without liability to the Agency.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
executed by their respective officers and representatives thereunto duly
authorized, the day and year first above written.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ATTEST:
By
Secretary
Chairman
(SEAL)
JONES HALL HILL & WHITE,
A Professional Law Corporation
By
APPROVED:
Andrew C. Hall, r.
By ✓�haron
Agency General Counsel
-
Stanton White��
3
nTmvT V U n TTr Vn OT TO n Tenwirn
Top underwriters in the field of Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds were
interviewed on Wednesday, November 10, 1982. A list of the firms
interviewed is attached with this report. The interview panel, which
included the financial advisor, a representative from the BIA, and City
staff, was unanimous in recommending Stone and Youngberg as the
underwriting firm. The interview panel based its recommendation on a
the following criteria: (1) expertise; (2) experience; (3) job
performance; and, (4) fee structure. (A copy of the firm's proposal is
attached.)
EXPERTISE: In the firm's work on other Housing Mortgage Bonds, it has
often used creative financing measures in order to assure that a bond
issue could be successfully closed. For example, the firm was the first
to successfully complete issuance of a Housing Mortgage Bond after the
federal regulations were inacted to restrict the use of Mortgage Bonds
in 1981. Only four programs were completed that year in the state of
California.
EXPERIENCE: Stone and Youngberg has had numerous bond issues completed
during the last few years, including several in the Southern California
area. The City previously has had a satisfactory relationship with the
firm of Stone and Youngberg when it recently handled the successful sale
of Assessment District bonds.
JOB PERFORMANCE: The key individual working an the bond program for the
RDA will be Scott Sollers, a partner in the firm with many years of
first -hand experience in the field of housing bonds, thus assuring the
RDA of the highest level of expertise. During the interview process, it
was clear that the key members of the Stone and Youngberg team were
thoroughly familiar with the needs and roles of all the participants in
the bond issue including the consultants, the developers, and the RDA.
The firm stressed the need for the City to rapidly gear up for the issue
in order to be ready after the first of the year to enter the bond
market. Their job performance in other cities in the state has been
very good. Several of the firm's clients in Southern California include
STAFF REPORT�y
VV
DATE:
November 11, 1982
FI'
-
TO:
Members of the Redevelopment Agency
19"
FROM:
Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY:
Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
SELECTION OF UNDERWRITER FOR HOUSING MORTGAGE
REVENUE
BOND
PR GRAM
Top underwriters in the field of Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds were
interviewed on Wednesday, November 10, 1982. A list of the firms
interviewed is attached with this report. The interview panel, which
included the financial advisor, a representative from the BIA, and City
staff, was unanimous in recommending Stone and Youngberg as the
underwriting firm. The interview panel based its recommendation on a
the following criteria: (1) expertise; (2) experience; (3) job
performance; and, (4) fee structure. (A copy of the firm's proposal is
attached.)
EXPERTISE: In the firm's work on other Housing Mortgage Bonds, it has
often used creative financing measures in order to assure that a bond
issue could be successfully closed. For example, the firm was the first
to successfully complete issuance of a Housing Mortgage Bond after the
federal regulations were inacted to restrict the use of Mortgage Bonds
in 1981. Only four programs were completed that year in the state of
California.
EXPERIENCE: Stone and Youngberg has had numerous bond issues completed
during the last few years, including several in the Southern California
area. The City previously has had a satisfactory relationship with the
firm of Stone and Youngberg when it recently handled the successful sale
of Assessment District bonds.
JOB PERFORMANCE: The key individual working an the bond program for the
RDA will be Scott Sollers, a partner in the firm with many years of
first -hand experience in the field of housing bonds, thus assuring the
RDA of the highest level of expertise. During the interview process, it
was clear that the key members of the Stone and Youngberg team were
thoroughly familiar with the needs and roles of all the participants in
the bond issue including the consultants, the developers, and the RDA.
The firm stressed the need for the City to rapidly gear up for the issue
in order to be ready after the first of the year to enter the bond
market. Their job performance in other cities in the state has been
very good. Several of the firm's clients in Southern California include
Selection of Bond Underwriter
RDA Agency Meeting
November 17, 1982
Page 2
Pomona, Duarte, and Simi Valley. The firm also has a good working
relationship with both the RDA's financial advisor and recommended bond
counsel.
FEES: The fee structure will be on a contingency basis. Any fees paid
to the underwriter will be contingent upon the successful sale of the
bond. Final agreement on fees cannot be made until just prior to the
sale of the bond when information is known about the financial rates of
the bond market. A separate ne otiated a reement will occur rior to
the sale of the bon owever, the consu tant has proposed that a clause
can be provided in this agreement which provides the City the ability to
withdraw from any negotiated sale should the City not be totally
satisfied with the financial arrangements.
Attached for your review is a draft of the proposed agreement for
investment banking services. Briefly, the underwriting services will
include the following:
1. Act as coordinator of the program and represent the RDA in
informational meetings.
2. Develop the financing program for sale of the bonds.
3. Assist the City in establishing a program criteria for
implementing Agency housing objectives as it relates to the
City's Housing Element.
4. Consult with the bond counsel in preparation of all necessary
legal documents.
Coordinate selection of lending firm and trustee.
6. Direct cash flow analysis that evaluates revenue derived from
the mortgage loans in order to recommend investment programs to
maximize yield on investment funds.
7. Develop official statement to be used in the sale of the bond
issues.
8. Assist in the presentation of the bond issue to the rating
agency.
9. Market the bonds on the basis of an immediate bonified public
offering.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency select
the firm of lone and Youngberg as the underwriting firm for the Housing
Mortgage Revenue Bond program and authorize the Chairman to execute the
proposed agreement for investment banking services. A separate
Selection of Bond Underwriter
RDA Agency Meeting
November 17, 1982
Page 3
agreement for negotiated compensation will be developed shortly before
the sale of the bonds for Agency review and approval. The RDA's
financial advisor will be instrumental in advising on final
negotiations.
Respe tf(�ull�y s mi ed,
c�JACK L AI
Community Development Director
JL:TJB:jr
Attachments: List of Firms
Proposal
Draft Contract
MORTGAGE BOND RESPONDENTS
UNDERWRITER
Stone & Youngberg
1 California Screet, Suite 2800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Scott Sollers - (415) 981 -1314
Warren Miller
x x x x x
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
505 Lomas Santa Fe Drive, Suite 200
Solana Beach, CA 92074
Michael F. Whipple - (714) 481 -5894
Greg Ballinger
• • x x x
A.G. Becker
1 Century Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90067
G. Noah Newmark - (213) 552 -6110
Victor Lee
Dean Whitter Reynolds, Inc.
45 Montgomery Street
P. 0. Box 7597
San Francisco, CA 94120
R. Thomas Westhoff
Shearson /American Express
600 Montgomery Street
47th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
James K. Chilton, Jr. - (415) 981 -6470
STO NE & YOC NGBERG
MEMBERS PACiFiC S70CK E\CNANGE
November 11, 1982
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 (Suite C)
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, C5 91730
Attention: Mr. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner:
Honorable Board Members:
This letter dill serve as an agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and Stone & Youngberg to serve as Managing
Underwriter to the Agency until the parties enter into an actual Purchase
Contract regarding the negotiated sale of single family Mortgage Revenue Bonds
to be issued by the Agency (the "Bonds ").
You have informed us that the Agency intends to issue the Bonds and provide
funds for mortgages on residences and projects to be built by various
developers and for this purm,se requires the services of a (Managing
Underwriter to structure the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract
with the Agency to purchase the Bonds through a negotiated price that is
agreeable to both parties. It is understood that the Managing Underwriter
will take primary responsibility for structuring and marketing the financing
but at all times will maintain a close relationship and dialogue with the
Agency staff and the Agency's financial advisor, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates.
As Managing Underwriter, we will use our utmost efforts to raise funds at the
most reasonable rates attainable in the market under then existing
conditions. In amplification of the understanding between the Agency and the
Managing Underwriter, Stone & Youngberg agrees to undertake the below listed
services and functions.
A. Structuring the Financings:
As Managing Underwriter to the Agency, Stone & Youngberg will work
with your staff in designing the scope of an economic feasibility
study addressing the marketability of the projects and their
projected cash flow. Stone & Youngberg will also assist the Agency
in the review and application of the study's results.
2. Stone & Youngberg will work with the Agency's bond counsel in
recommending specific terms and conditions affecting the basic
security of the Bonds.
3. Stone & Youngberg will assist the Agency in selecting a major banking
firm to serve as trustee for the mortgage lending programs. We will
assist bond counsel in preparing a list of services required of the
trustee.
ONE CALIFORNIA STREET SUITE 2800 • SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111 - W51 981 1314
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
November 11, 1992
Page 2
4. Stone & Youngberg will assist the Agency and developers in selecting
qualified mortgage lenders to originate and service the mortgage
loans. Stone & Youngberg will assist the Agency define the rules and
regulations to be adopted by the Agency that prescribe standards by
which mortgages are purchased and serviced.
S. Stone & Youngberg will prepare detailed mortgage originating and
servicing guides that define specific procedures for selecting
eligibile mortgages and mortgagors and sets forth reporting
requirements for the servicing of such loans.
6. Stone & Youngberg will direct a cash flow analysis that evaluates the
revenue derived from the mortgage loans, including prepayments and
penalties, and determines the optimum maturity structure based on
market conditions and security provisions and recommends an
investment program to maximize yield on investable funds.
7. Stone & Youngberg will prepare the text of a bond prospectus for sale
of the securities. Such prospectus will include a description of the
bonds and their security, the parties to the agreements, the project,
the mortgage lending program, and pertinent financial and economic
data. In preparation of such prospectus we will exercise due
diligences in the ascertainment of all material facts and
circumstances regarding the project and in their disclosure in the
prospectus.
8. Stone & Youngberg will contact one or more rating agencies and
provide them with sufficient information to obtain a rating on the
bonds prior to their sale.
9. Stone & Youngberg will represent the Agency at any necessary
information meeting or meetings. (Depending upon the results of the
feasibility study and /or the status of the municipal bond market,
such meetings may or may not be necessary.)
B. Marketina the Bonds:
The Managing Underwriter will use its best efforts to accomplish the
formal marketing of the Bonds which should be accomplished at the
earliest dates possible consistent with sound investment banking and
underwriting principles. It is intended that, once purchased by
Stone & Youngberg, the Bonds will be re- offered to the public on the
basis of an immediate "bona fide public offering ". Stone & Youngberg
may form a group of investment banking firms for the purpose of
underwriting and selling the Bonds.
At the designated time for re -sales of the Bonds, Stone & Youngberg
will submit an offer to the Agency to purchase the Bonds, subject to
pertinent resolutions, the Official Statement, a minimum rating of
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
November 11, 1982
Page 3
investment grade (Baa or Bad) by either bloody s Investors Service
and /or Standard & Poor's Corporation, and all other necessary
documents, approvals, and proceedings governing such Bonds having
been determined by bond counsel, the Agency, and the Managing
Underwriter to be satisfactory in all respects for financing purposes.
3. At least one day prior to the submission of any such formal offer to
the Agency for the purchase of the Bonds, Stone & Youngberg will
indicate to the Agency the interest rate or rates, the purchase price
from the Agency, and public offering price of the Bonds which we then
estimate will be included in such offer. If after negotiations in
good faith, the Agency and Stone & Youngberg fail to agree upon
specific terms for the sale of the bonds, the Agency may then proceed
to sell the bonds to others.
C. General Provisions Relating to the Agency and the Managing Underwriter
1. The Agency agrees to make available to Stone & Youngberg without cost
sufficient copies of the economic and other reports, agreements,
contracts, resolutions, Preliminary and Final Official Statements,
and other relevant documents pertaining to the projects, the Agency,
or the bonds as reasonably may be required from time to time For the
prompt and efficient performance by Stone & Youngberg of their
obligations hereunder.
2. Stone & Youngberg shall pay its own out -of- pocket and other expenses,
the cost of Blue Sky and Investment Memoranda used by the
Underwriters and all advertising expenses in connection with the
public offering of the Bonds.
3. The Agency shall pay from the proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of
the Agency all costs and expenses customarily paid therefrom,
including the cost of printing the bonds, Official Statements and
other documents, the fees and expenses of its legal counsel,
special tax counsel, financial consultants, accountants,
rating services, and of any other experts retained by the Agency in
connection with the financing.
4. It is expressly understood and agreed, and the Agency hereby
recognizes that in performing its activities pursuant to a negotiated
sale that Stone & Youngberg is acting solely on its own behalf as the
prospective manager of an underwriting group which plans to submit to
the Agency a proposal to purchase the bonds for resale. Nothing
herein shall be construed to make the Managing Underwriter an
employee or financial, fiscal, or other advisor of the Agency, or to
establish any fiduciary relationship between the Agency and the
Managing Underwriter.
This agreement shall extend to the date of sale of the Bonds as
contemplated herein, when the formal bond Purchase Contract is
entered into by the parties.
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
November 11, 1982
Page 4
6. The Agency may terminate this agreement at any time on or after the
last day of December, 1984, following receipt by the Managing
Underwriter of written notification from the Agency.
7. Upon termination of this agreement, the Agency shall be under no
further obligation to the Managing Underwriter hereunder, except that
the Agency is obligated to pay to the Managing Underwriter any
expenses incurred on behalf of the Agency pursuant to Paragraph C(3)
of this agreement should the Agency not sell the bonds to the
Managing Underwriter on behalf of the Underwriters pursuant to
Section 8 of this agreement.
0. Scheduling
I. It is mutually understood and agreed that all parties will take
whatever action is deemed reasonable to consummate the financing in
the shortest period of time consistent with the State's Mortgage Bond
Allocation Committee schedule and sound investment banking principles.
2. In order to be in a position to react quickly following receipt of an
allocation, the following steps are recommended:
Date
November I7, 1982
November 18, 1982
November 19, 1982
November 22, 1982
December 6, 1982
December 17, 1982
December 31, 1982
January 1 -30, 1983
January 15, 1983
January 28, 1983
February 12, 1983
February 22, 1983
March 1, 1983
Acoard ietivit
- Agency eting
Interview Economic Consultants
- Developers' Preliminary Meeting
- Select Economic Consultant
- Distribute Developer Questionnaire and Preliminary
Developer Agreement
- Second Developers' Meeting, Agency Board workshop,
Feasibility Analysis commences
- Execute Preliminary Developer Agreement
- Developers deposit 1 /2% Reservation Fee
- Receive Allocation
- Distribute Draft Feasibility Study, Official Statement
and legals
- Rating meeting (San Francisco or New York City)
- Receive rating
- Market Bonds
- Deliver proceeds
3. It is understood that the above schedule is recommended based on
reasonable estimates and that failure to meet any of the dates above
shall not constitute a violation of this agreement.
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
November 11, 1982
Page 5
E. Key Person Designation
It is understood and agreed that the principal individual on behalf of
Stone & Youngberg with primary responsibility for the Agency's financing will
be Scott C. Sollers, partner. Principal support will be provided by Warren E.
Miller.
Upon your acceptance set forth below, this letter will constitute an
agreement between the Agency and the undersigned.
STONE & YOUNGBERG
By
Accepted this day of 1982
CITY OF RANCHO CU AVIONGA
By
STAFF REPORTS
=I f
0
DATE: November 17, 1982 F'-
U
1977
TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR REDEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES
Please find attached the proposed agreement for redevelopment con-
sulting services with MST, Inc. The scope of work is stipulated
in the agreement and the sum of the proposed contract shall not ex-
ceed $10,000 without further Agency authorization. Please note
that the services agreement will be on an as needed hourly basis.
No work will be commenced unless authorized by the Executive Director.
The Agency, thus, has direct control over both work and cost. The
first task of the consultant will be to review documents submitted
by the Hahn Company and to attend with City staff, the December 7th
meeting of the Hahn Company and their redevelopment staff.
As mentioned before, MST has experience in structuring discussions
leading to the development of regional shopping centers.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Agency approval of the attached
agreement and authorize execution of the agreement by the Chairman
of th9LAM,AICP
Res eiL
J
Community Development Director��__
JL:.7 k
Attach.
LAW OF[IC ES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
Lauren Wasserman
Executive Director & Secretary
Redevelopment Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
E,s -�. �zs Meu11Nw
P•I,tt 5 Ii OP VI♦ 9336E
,3 g]S SL336s
za,P5 eRADLEY ROAO,ALITC I9O
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
=OSn S], 6i]`i 535NI sOOI.
Re: Contractual Services Agreement for
Redevelopment Implementation Services
Dear Lauren:
Pursuant to the request of Manny DeDios of
Municipal Services, Inc., we have reviewed a copy of an
Agreement for Redevelopment Implementation Services
between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and
Municipal Services, Inc. We have discussed with Mr.
DeDios our recommendation that paragraphs 1 and 5 of
Article I be amended to refer not only to the specifically
named commercial enterprises, but in addition to "and
such other commercial enterprises as may be appropriate,"
We have found the agreement to be legally
sufficient and would recommend that it be submitted to
the Agency and that the Chairman be authorized to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
JEB:bjs
ce: Municipal Services, Inc.
Yours sincerely,
i
John E, Brown of
Best, Best & Krieger
Counsel to Redevelopment Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
_
xnn
• x•ttx x>"200
oxa
ORANGE STREET
CI, IC
P. O BOX 1026
FILL I.
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
-
TEI.EPMONE )714) 666- 4GO
A 11"T -
I.
•�- �• - »�•_•
November 12, 1982
Lauren Wasserman
Executive Director & Secretary
Redevelopment Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
E,s -�. �zs Meu11Nw
P•I,tt 5 Ii OP VI♦ 9336E
,3 g]S SL336s
za,P5 eRADLEY ROAO,ALITC I9O
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
=OSn S], 6i]`i 535NI sOOI.
Re: Contractual Services Agreement for
Redevelopment Implementation Services
Dear Lauren:
Pursuant to the request of Manny DeDios of
Municipal Services, Inc., we have reviewed a copy of an
Agreement for Redevelopment Implementation Services
between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and
Municipal Services, Inc. We have discussed with Mr.
DeDios our recommendation that paragraphs 1 and 5 of
Article I be amended to refer not only to the specifically
named commercial enterprises, but in addition to "and
such other commercial enterprises as may be appropriate,"
We have found the agreement to be legally
sufficient and would recommend that it be submitted to
the Agency and that the Chairman be authorized to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
JEB:bjs
ce: Municipal Services, Inc.
Yours sincerely,
i
John E, Brown of
Best, Best & Krieger
Counsel to Redevelopment Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
r ZI
AGREP.,P'NT FOR REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION SEP.V/CES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVEi OPMENT AGENCY
AND
MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
q
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __ _ day of November, 1952, by
and between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA -MONGA REDEVELOPMEa ;T AGENCY
(hereinafter called "Agency ") and MUNICIPAL SERVICES, IFC„ a coe or-:ticn located e.
'(12 aortn Dbm,ond liar Boulevard, Diamond 11a1, C,d :i.n,, ;.: S17-.5
RECITALS
Agency firs need for professional consulting service- to aA;mrot cad assist Agency
staff in impl- menting Agency improvement projects within the prov'ousi)' established
Rancho Rerh•velopmenl Protect Area, and NISI is a duly ostab!ished Ca'ifor:d- Corporation
v:hich is fully Guatified to provide the desired radevelup:r, e ;:t imp.en:et,lation ecrdulOng
scrvicas.
COVENANTS
ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF {YORK
The services to be performed by NISI .viii comprise the foilo,v?ng so, vioess r,ad
I. Assist staff in developing and implementing exc ;usive ;,or nations 1 fn t,ye
Agency and the joint venture of the Hahn Company; Carter, ihwley, llalr; ,ce May CO. ,*
for purposes of establishing parameters and responsibilities pertinent b) devebp,nent of a
me.jur reglcnal shopping center within the Rancho Rede�eioprcen. Proju! -L
2. Assist stiff in determining and /or authenticating contemporary ,:, n. ;r! msit ;tora
eritaria for estabUs;irr, new ;tore: within previously unta..e, "•7 trerle
3. Assist :tuff iA e ;aluati^.- contzmporary de;Artment 9lor2 ai itori,t ;uch as
spendable income within the trade area, financial feasibility of the prax „mil ro „ions;
shopping cent. ,, timing for !cvrloppmeaf, e;ui other m- rkclir,; fa'•to's.
A. Advise staff, a, Ii,:: prnpri ^ty.:r And rlal.:L:,; sw-n rutiors as may be dos /, .roir: to
prop ^ay r�gnct positivr n. ;sect >: or lunncho Cue- imunga :- pro,",;ad r. ^,givanl .,ii!nq ^o1:er
site !oeation.
-i-
*and such other commercial enterprises as may be appropriate
5. Assist staff in negotiations wi!h the joint venture of Hahn Company; Carter,
Hawley, Hale; -lay Co., "et al. toward consummating an "Owner Participation Agreement',
such that development of the proposed major regional shopping center in Rancho Cucamont .I
is assurod within some reasonable time frame and upon reasonable terms to the Agency.
6. If desirable to facilitate actual commitments from prospective department store
tenants, advise staff on the propriety of utilizing a variety of financing aids to improve the
financial feasibility of the proposed shopping center. Financing aids evaluation could
include but will not necessarily be limited to utilization of assessment bonds, lease revenue
bonds, tax allocation bonds, certificates of participation, and other similar financing tools,
including combinations of those tools mentioned herein.
7. Adriae stiff on measures which might be r•��.�r. to rlle,qate in
implemonting file development, process by assisting staff in faeititating negotiations with
other governmental agencies =uch as Cal Trans.
B. Assist staff in both preparing for and actually conducting presentations to
proposed department store users/anchor tenants, lenders, co- developers, and others.
9. Serve as an extention of Agency staff in all aspects of developer negotiations.
ARTICLE II. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. Compensation
Corupen : :a Lion to MSI shall be on an hourly basis in accordance with the followir,,; fee.
schedule:
Principal $95 /hr
Senior Associate $65 /hr
Analyst $35 /hr
Clerical $15 /hr
The rates stipulated above small be valid for one year following execution of iris
Agreement. In no event shall the total compensation paid to NISI for all services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement exceed the cumulative sum of $lo,000 without further written
authorhaation by the Agency.
In addition to the above rates, expenses incurred by 3ISI for out -of -town travol by
common carrier and ;elated costs shall be reimbursed by Agency provided that such travel
has teen prc-viously re;picstted by the Agency.
No work pursuant to the Scope of Services deier5ed in ads Agreement shall bo
commenced by MSI until authorized by the Agency's hxe,,;Wvs Director.
-2-
"and such other commercial enterprises as may be appropriate
B. Method of Payment
NISI shall submit each month an invoice to Agency for services rendered during tha
previous month indicating the total amount due. Such invoice shall state the compensation
category, the hours expended, the hourly rate and provide an itemized list of reimbursable
expenses incurred by MSL
Invoice submitted by MSI shall be payable by Agency within 30 days of receipt and
approval by Agency.
ARTICLE M. RIGHT OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
Agency or NISI may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice
sent certified mail to the other. In the event of such termination, NISI shall be compensated
for all services rendered to date of notice of termination, less any amounts previously paid
by Agency. "Date of Termination" shall be the date thirty (30) days following receipt of
notice of termination.
ARTICLE IV. KEY MAN
As an express condition of Agency's entering into this ;lgreement, llc.nuei L. Du Uius
agrees to serve as key man and shall be principal representative of NSI for all
presentations negotiations with lenders, tenants, developers, nod others. U at any time the
services of Mr. DeDios are not personally available to the Agency pursuant to this
Agreement, then the Agency at its option may immediately terminate this Agreement.
ARTICLE V. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. Any
amendments to or clarification necessary to this Agreement shall be in writing and
acknowledged by both parties to the Agreement.
..3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this contract is signed by the parties hereto on the date first
above written.
ATTEST:
Gity Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ageni�y Attorney - - - -�—
MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
By
Manuel L. DeDios
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
Chairman of Governing Body
-4-
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, November
17, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Jon D.
Mikels.
Present were: City Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II,
Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd
Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill
Holley.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Mayor Mikels declared the week of November 21 -27 as Family Week in
Rancho Cucamonga.
b. Mayor Mikels announced that the Chaffey Joint Union High School
District Board of Trustees at their last meeting unanimously named
the new school in Etiwanda as Etiwanda High School.
C. The Redevelopment Agency set December 6 for a workshop to discuss the
Mortgage Revenue Bond process. Meeting will be held in the Lions
Park Community Center at 7:00 p.m.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mr. Schlosser stated he would like to discuss items "i" and "m ". He said both
of these were bidders outside the City and wanted to know if All American was
the company who did Arrow Route, and if there had been any local bidders. Mr.
Hubbs responded that there were some local companies such as Fontana Paving
that did bid. All American was the one who did Arrow Route. Mr. Schlosser
asked how could we be assured they would do a better job. Mr. Hubbs stated
that staff would watch more closely and make sure they did a better job.
The City Attorney stated that we were required by State Law to award contracts
to the lowest bidder. If they were licensed, then they are considered a
responsible bidder.
Mr. Mikels asked if there was a mechanism to accept the next highest bidder.
Mr. Dougherty stated that Council would have to make a determination, then the
company would be given a chance to make his case before Council. Generally,
courts have leaned very heavily toward the lowest bidder. It was not his
recommendation to award the contract to anyone but the lowest bidder.
Mr. Schlosser requested that the items be included in the Consent Calendar for
approval.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82- 11 -17, in the amount of $401,072.95.
d. Intent to Order Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
for Tract No. 12040 located at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and
Turner Avenue.
(3) RESOLUTION NO. 82 -193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT 12040)
(4) RESOLUTION NO. 82 -194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME
AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
(TRACT 12040).
(5) e. Intention to Vacate a 30 -foot service road located on the south side of
Foothill Blvd. in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista
Investment.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. IN CONNECTION
WITH PARCEL MAP 6114.
(6) f. Approval extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 9351 located on the
west side of Sapphire north of 19th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9351.
(7) g. Approval of Parcel Map 7451, Bonds and Agreement located at the southwest
corner of Nilson and Haven Avenues submitted by the Church of the Latter
Day Saints.
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
h. Summarily vacate an unused 15 -foot wide drainage easement located on (8)
Parcel Map 5670, northeast corner of 6th Street and Milliken Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SU144ARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A 15 FOOT WIDE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
i. Award of contract for Carnelian Street Improvements (05- 06 -55) to Fontana (9)
Paving, Inc., the lowest bidder at $144,712,820 - to include asphaltic
concrete (A.C.) overlay and /or reconstruction of Carnelian Street between
19th Street and Wilson Avenue and minor A.C. overlaying in Banyan Street,
east of Carnelian Street. Bid is 33% below the Engineer's estimate of
$216,000.
j. Parcel Map 6194, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of A.T. A (10)
S.F. Railroad track -- Approval of reduction in bonds from $850,000 to
$20,000.
k. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion:
1. Tract 9212 - located on the north side of Banyan, east of Beryl.
Owner: Prado Woods Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $58,000
2. Tract 9240 - located north of Banyan, west of Hellman. Owner: Prado
Woods Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $42,000
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 9212 AND 9240
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
(11)
1. Approval of Resolution revising and updating Resolution No. 81 -154. (12)
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -154 -A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NAMING THOSE
INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BE ALLOWED TO SIGN SMALL
CLAIMS COURT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO CITY
LICENSING PROGRAMS.
M. Award of contract to the low bidder, All American Asphalt, for the (13)
reconstruction of Sapphire Street from Rosebud to Vinmar at $46,652.50
plus a 10% contingency.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
e family idential /planned development) and the
development of 76 condominium units on 11.03 acres of land at the northwest
corner of Highland and Haven Avenue - APN 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 37, 40. Staff
report presented by Rick Gomez, city planner.
Mr. Frost stated that there had been a discussion about excluding the portion
which was within the Route 30 corridor. What was finally done?
Mr. Gomez stated that this parcel was part of the total; the balance of the
site which is within the freeway corridor is not included within the project.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 186.
ORDINANCE NO. 186 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 201 - 161 -28, 30, 31,
37, AND 40 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
HIGHLAND AND HAVEN AVENUES FROM R -1 AND R -3 TO
R- 3 /P.D.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 186. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels set December 1, 1982 for second reading.
(15) 4B. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO PARK AND RECREATION LAND. This amendment to Ordinance No. 105
prepared by the City Attorney's Office reflects State mandated changes
resulting from Senate Bill 1785 authored by Senator Foran. Staff report by
dill Holley.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 105 -B.
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -B (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK AND RECREATION
LAND INCLUDING SAYINGS PROVISIONS.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 105 -B. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Both Mr. Buquet and Mr. Frost congratulated Mr. Holley on the way he handled
this matter during the Foran hearings. Mr. Holley expressed how serious this
was for the city and how it has imperiled the plans of the community which
were established by the General Plan.
Mayor Mikels set December 1, 1982 for second reading.
The city attorney stated that the State does not provide a kennel provision
for cities within rabies areas. All dogs, if over four months old, within a
rabies area, must be individually licensed and vaccinated. The counties or
cities have an option if not within such an area. However, the question of
the fee is open for consideration.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Speaking were:
*Mr. Dobson, owner of the kennel, stated he has had the kennel for
over thirty years under the county. He could get a kennel license
from the County and did not have to license each dog individually
although he did have to provide proof of rabies vaccination.
Mr. Schlosser stated this was a matter that Mr. Dobson did r.ot want to get the
dogs licensed; it was regarding the fees.
*Mrs. Dobson stated they had to license each adult dog each year, and
this adds an additional expense on their breeding dogs.
Sandy Hackney stated that on November 4th, Mrs. Fryman of the Humane Society
surveyed the kennel and discovered the Dobson's had ten german shepherd dogs
at that time.
Discussion followed between Mr. Dobson and Council regarding the price each
dog was sold for and the total fees for each dog.
Mr. Buquet stated he was confused and did not understand exactly what Mr.
Dobson wanted from the Council. Mr. Dobson said he wanted the Council do like
the County does and issue a blanket license for kennels.
Mr. Frost inquired as to what precipitated this issue at this time of year.
Mr. Wasserman responded that this issue has been going on for some time
between staff and the Dobsons.
Mr. Frost stated that the purpose of a license was to be assured each animal
received its rabies vaccinations.
Mrs. Hackney stated that the dogs were licensed for the year. A new ordinance
was being worked on by the cities and should be ready for adoption by next
fiscal year. It was anticipated that this would include a reduced license fee
for kennels.
Mr. Dahl wanted to go on record stating that something should be done to
eliminate the problem and direction should be given to staff to make a
determination, perhaps in conjunction with the Chaffey Humane Society.
Mr. Wasserman stated it would make sense to have an uniform policy throughout
the Chaffey Humane Society District.
Hr. Frost concurred, but stated how would like staff prepare some type of
detailed report. Licensing is not a profit - making venture and some adjustment
could be made. Perhaps it could be possible to have licenses transferrable.
After further discussion, Council concurred that some type of adjustment
should be made, but that it should go through the normal process with an
amendment to the fee resolution in about mid -May for the new fiscal year and
before new licenses have to be obtained.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
(17) 7A. DIRECT ELECT.JN OF MAYOR. Report from the Citizens Advisory Commission
was presented by Jim Robinson.
Mayor Mikels asked Mr. Gracia, member of the CAC, if he had any further input
from the CAC meeting. Mr. Gracia stated he was one of the commissioners who
voted to have an elected mayor.
Paul Saldana, member of the CAC, stated he was in opposition to an elected
mayor. He said he was conducting a survey, but it wasn't complete and had
nothing to report at the present time.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. There being no comments,
the public portion of the meeting was closed.
After further discussion, Council concurred not to waste any further time on
the item.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to defer the item until a later
time. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
7B. PARKS COMMISSION. Staff report by Bill Holley.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was:
*Nacho Gracia who felt a Parks Commission would be appropriate
because it would be able to concentrate all efforts on one item.
Mr. Buquet stated it was his intent to have this body from the CAC report to
the Council, not to the CAC.
Mr. Dahl stated he was not in agreement with this. He felt that a Commission
from the CAC would be better. Also, he favored them having their own meeting
time and not have it on a back -to -back basis with the CAC.
Mr. Frost felt that there still was a need to form a group of interested
people on a short -term basis for concentrated efforts.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to form a Parks Advisory
Committee to report to the Council with appointments coming from the CAC; it
be a five - member body; and the meeting times be separate from the CAC with
time to be determined by the Council; be held as public meetings with one
member from each of the three communities, with members serving at the
pleasure of the council.
Mr. Frost asked if composition of the committee should be included under
separate motion because the language doesn't seek balance such as distribution
of members. Mr. Frost also stated he wanted to seek two additional members
from the general public for this committee.
Mr. Buquet stated that he did not want to get off in another discussion, but
to stick to the motion on the floor.
Mayor Mikels stated that we could reserve for the future a change in the
committee makeup.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
is to go in a to owner of
about $10 to $20,000.
8. ADJOURNMENT. Notion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to adjourn, not
to reconvene. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:35
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk