HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/12/15 - Agenda PacketGi cn _trgl
U 77
CITY OF
RANUM CUr MONCA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line
Rancho Cucamonga
December 15, 1982 - 7:30 p.m.
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline
for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting, The
City Clerk's Office receives all such items,
1. CALL TO ORDER.
• A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. r
B. Roll Call: Dahl `, Buquet _-, Frost
Schlosser _, and Mikels
C. Approval of Minutes: November 17, 1982.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. -
a. Thursday, December 30, 1982, 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY
COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base
Line Road.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -12 -15 in the total
amount of $322,671.63.
b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mary M. Harkins and
Baquer Mirza, Bravo Pizza, 8800 -8 Base Line Road, for On
Sale Beer & Wine License.
City Council Aqenda 2 December 15, 1982
s
c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Edwin H. and Ruth M.
Vischer, Heidelberg Delicatessen, 8798 19th St., for On
Sale Beer S Wine Eating Place License.
d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Joe and Sharon Lee
Davidson, Deane's, 8108 San Bernardino Rd., for On Sale
General Public Premises License.
e. Approval of Changes to the Urbanized Boundaries and the
Federal Aid Urban System.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING
CERTAIN ROADS TO BE IN THE FEDERAL -AID URBAN
SYSTEM.
f. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Ag:eement for 9757 Liberty Street submitted by Ray
and Nancy Jones.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM RAY AND NANCY JONES AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
SAME.
g. Cooperation Agreement with the County of San Bernardino
to Provide Assistance in Obtaining I.R.S. 103b Multiple
Family Housing Mortgage Bond. This agreement provides
for San Bernardino County to act as the issuing
authority for a multiple family mortgage bond issue to
be used an an approved multiple family housing
development east of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street.
h. Request for approval of right -of way documents for final
remaining parcels in Assessment District 82 -1.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -206 29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING OFFERS OF
DEDICATION FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAIN
EASEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 62 -1.
E
City Council Agenda
December 15, 1982
i. Release of Bond and Notice of Completion. =0
*Parcel Map 6322 - located on Foothill Blvd. east of
Vineyard Ave. (Gemco). Owner: Lewis Development Co.
Performance Bond (Road) $223,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 6322
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
J. Request Loan to Redevelopment Agency to fund Day Creek
Bureau of Reclamation Grant.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. VACATION OF THE SERVICE ROAD LOCATED ON THE 35
• SOUTHSIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. IN CONNECTION WITH
PARCEL MAP 6114 SUBMITTED BY VISTA INVESTMENT.
Request to continue public hearing for the vacation
of the service road located on the southside of
Foothill Blvd. in connection With Parcel Map 6114
submitted by Vista Investment. Report by Lloyd
Hubbs.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE. CHANGE 82 -03 -
BIDCAL. A change of zone from R -1 (Single Family
Residential) to R -3 (Multiple Family Residential)
for 2.02 acres of land located on the west side of
Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street - APN
202 - 131 -61 and 62. Staff report by Rick Gomez.
ORDINANCE NO. 187 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202-
131-61 AND 62, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF MONTE
VISTA STREET FROM R -1 TO R -3.
J
City Council Agenda 4 December 15, 1982
•
C. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NO. 12040.
—_ --- RESOLUTION NO. 82- 208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
/ ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NO.
12040.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATION.
Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Review of request from Red Hill Country Club to
participate in construction of retaining wall to
stabilize slope on Red Hill Country Club Drive
north of Foothill Blvd.
•
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS.
A. SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVE FOR SCAOMD BOARD,
B. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO PARR ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.
S. ADJOURNMENT.
11
0
November 17, 1982
CITY OF PAN-40 CUCAM0110A
CITY COCNCLL MINUTES
Peg's ldr M >¢tinft
ALL TO CEDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City cf Rancho Cocamonga was he 11
in the Lions Park Coemunity Center, 9161 Dean Line Road cc Wednesday, Noveroer
17, 1952. The meeting vas called to older at 7;05 p.m. by Mayor Jon �.
Mikels.
Present were: City Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles a. Duquet -1,
Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikeim.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. we: ermen; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Community Development Director. Jac:' Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd
Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Repay; and Community Services Director, Hill
Holley.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Mayor Mikels declared the week of November 21 - 27 as Family Week in
Ranehe Cucamonga.
b. Mayor Mikels announced that the Chaffey Joint Union High School
• District Board of Trustees at their last meeting unanimously nixed
the new school in Etlaanda as Etiwanda High School.
a. Me Redevelopment Agency set December 6 for a workshop to discuss the
Mortgage Revenue Bond process. Meeting will be held in the Liens
Park Community Center at 1:00 p.m.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mr. Suhlosser stated he would like to discuss Stems -I- and "m He said both
of these were e bidders outside the city and wanted to know if All American was
the company who did Arrow Route, and if there were any local bidders. Mr.
Hobbs r.aognded that there were some local companies such as Fontana Paving
that did bid. All American was the one who did Arrow Route, Mr. Schlosser
asked if they would do a bettty :ob, and how could we be assured they would.
Mr. Ruble stated that they would watch more closely and make sure they did a
better job.
The City Attorney stated that we were required by State Law to award contracts
to the Ioweat bidder. If they were licensed, than they are conslderad a
responsible bidder.
Mr. Yikrls asked :f there was a meetnnism to accept the next highest bidder.
Mr. Dinghnrty stated that COtlnC it would have to Ake a determinatioh, then the
company v 111,1 be given a chance to make his cage before council. Generally,
courts have leaned very heavily toward the lowest bidder. It vas not his
reaommenletidn to award the contract to anyone but thr lawest bidder.
Mr. Drhlnnser requested that the lines be inoluoed in the Consent Calendar for
approval.
3
City Council Minutes
November 17, 1982
Page 2
A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 02 -11 -17 in the amount of
$401,072.95.
B. Forward Claim against the City by Ohio Casualty Group to the city
attorney for handling.
C. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mercedes N. and Stephen I. Elias
for on -sale beer and vine eating place, MI Casita, 9608 Dane Line
Road
D. Intent t0 Order Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1 for Tract No. 12040 located at the northeast corner of Arrow
Highway and Turner Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 82_193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA,
CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO, 11 TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT
12040)
•
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1, AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE •
DISTRICT NO. 1{ PURSUANT To THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME.
AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
E. Intention to Vacate a 30 foot service road located on the south side
of Foothill Blvd. in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by
Vista Investment.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. IN CONNECTION
WITH PARCEL MAP 6114
F. Approval extention of Improvement Agreement for Tract 9351 located on
the west side of Sapphire north of 19th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -196
A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCATeONOA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9351
G. Approval of Parcel Map 7451. Bonds and Agreement located at the
southwest corner of 'silica and Haven Avenue» submitted by the Church
of the latter Day Saints
•
City Council Minutes
November 17, 1992
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 62 -197
'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPPOVI:iJ
PARCEL MAP NO. 7451, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
H.
Summarily vacate an unused 15 -foot wide drainage Ise eeent located on
Parcel Map 5670, northeast corner of 6th Street and Milliken Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. 62 -190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A 15 FOOT AIDE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I.
Awerd of contract for Carnelian Street Impnyements (05 -06 -55) to
Portals Paving, Inc., the lowest bidder at !144,712,62 - to include
asphaltic concrete (A.C.) overlay and/or reconstruction of Carnelian
Street between 19th Street and Wilson Avenue and minor P.C.
overlaying in Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street. Bid is 35$
below the Engineer's estimate of $216,000.
J,
Parcel Map 6194, located on the east side or Haven Avenue, mouth of
_
A.T. A S.P. Railroad tract -- Approval of reduction in bonds from
650,000 to $20,OOD.
•
E.
Release or Bonds and Notice of Completion:
1. Tract 9212 - located oa the north aide of Banyan, east or
-
Beryl. Owner: Prado Wands Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $50,000
2. Tract 9240 - located north or Banyan, vest of Hellman. Owner:
Prods Woods Corp.
Faithful Performance (road) $42,000
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 9212 AND 9240
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE MARK.
L.
Approval of Resolution revising and updating Resolution No. 81 -154.
RESOLUTION NO, 81 -154 -A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NAMING THOSE
INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BE ALLOWED TO SIGN SMALL
CLAIMS COURT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO CITY
LICENSING PROD RAMS,
M.
Award of contract to the low bidder, All A.meriean Asphalt, for the
r construction or Sapphtrr Street from Rosebud to Vinmar at
$46,652.50 plus a 10% contingency.
city Council Minutes
November 17, 1992
Page 4
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Front to approve the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimo.alY 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -09 (TENTATIVE TRACT
11804 AND 11805) - ALLEH: A change of tone from R -1 (single family
residential) and R -3 (multiple family residential /planned development) and the
development of 76 condominium units on 11.03 acres of land at the northaeat
Corner of Highland and Haven Avenue - APH 201- 262 -2B, 3n, 31, 37, 40 Staff
report presented by Rick Gomez, city planner.
Mr. Front stated that there had been a discussion about eacluding the per ion
which ... within the Route 30 ...rider. What wa. finally done?
Mr. Gomez stated that this parcel was part of the total; the valance of the
site which is within the freeway corridor is not included within the project.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Namerman read the title of Ordinanoe No. !86
ORDINANCE NO. 186 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMHERS 201- 262 -28, 30, 31,
37, AND 40 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
HIGHLAND AND HAVEN AVENUES FROM N -1 AND R -3 TO
R- 3 /P.D.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, ascended by Dahl to valve further reading of
ordinance rye. 186. Nation carried unanimomly 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels at December 1, 1982 for ascend reading.
4B. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16.32 OP TN£ RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO PARE AND RECREATION LAND Thla amendment to Ordinance No. 105
prepared by the City Attorney's Office reflects State mandated changes
resulting from Senate Bill 1705 authored by Senator Pored. Staff report by
Bill Hollev,
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no respond.,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasaeramn read the title of Ordinance No. 105 -8.
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -8 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK AND RECREATION
LAND INCLUDING SAVINGS PROVISIONS.
I�
•
• CSCY Council Minutes
Minu
November 1Mi tes
Page 5
Motion: Moved by Dahl, sC,OCdld by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 105 -B. Motion Carried unanimously 5 -0.
Both Mr. Buquet -ad Mr. Frost Congratulated Mr. Holley on the way he handled
this matter during the Foran hearing,. Mr. Holley expressed how serious the
was for the city and how it has imperiled the plans of the --us ill which
were established by the General Plan,
Mayor Mikels set December 1 for second reading
5. STAFF REPORTS
5A. LICBMSING OF KENNEL DOGS - SHEPHARD RANCH KENNEL - .OSEFH DOBSON Sandy
Hackney, Business License Inspector, presented the start report.
The city attorney stated that the State does not provide a kennel provision
for cities within rabies area a. All doge, if over four months old, within A
rabies area. mu at be individually licensed and vaccinated. me counties er
cities have an option if not within such an area. Otherwise, each animal over
four menthe old within these area. must be individually licensed. However,
the question of the fee 1s open for 'sea ideration.
Mayer Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Speaking war.
*Mr. Dobson stated he he, bad the kennel for over thirty years under the
county. He could get a kennel lloene from the County and did not have to
license each dog individually although he did have to provide proof of
rabies vaccination.
•
Mr. Schlosser stated this we, a matter that Mr. Dobson did not want to at the
dog, licensed; it was regarding the fees.
*Mrs. WD.on stated they bad to license each adult dog each year, end this
adds an additional expense on their breeding dogs.
Randy Hackney stated that on November 4th, "a, Fryman of the Humane Society
surveyed the kennel and discovered the Schedule had tan german shepherd dogs
at that time.
Discussion followed between Mr. Dobson and council regarding the price each
dog was sold for and the total fees for each dog.
Mr. Buquet stated he was confused and did not understand exactly what Mr.
Dobson wanted from the Council. Mr. Dobson said he wanted the Council do like
the County does and Issue a blanket license for kennel..
Mr. Frost inquired as to what precipitated this issue at this time of year.
Mr. Wasserman responded that this issue has been going on for some time with
staff.
Mr. Frost stated that the purpose or a license was to be assured each animal
received its rabies vaccinations.
Mrs. Hackney stated that the dogs were licensed for the year. A new ordinance
was being vorkon on by the Cities and should be ready for adoption by next
fiscal year. It was anticipated that this would include a reduced license fee
for kennels.
Mr. Dahl wanted to go on retard stating that something should be done to
e1lnSm to the problem and direction should be given to start to make a
determination, Perhaps in cnnp.metion with the Chaff, Hunan. Society.
City Council minutes •
November 17, mina
Page 6
Mr. Wasserman stated it would make sense to have an uniform policy throughout
the Chaffey Humane Society District,
Mr. Frost concurred, but Stated he Would like staff prepare s m e type of
detailed report. Licensing in not a profit - making venture and s meadjustment
could be made. Perhaps it could be possible to have licenses transferrable.
After further discussion. Council c urred that s me
type of adjustnt
Should be made, but that it would goo through the normal process with an
amendment to the fee resolution in shoat mid -May for the new fiscal year and
before new licenses have to be obtained.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none.
Mayor Mantle called a recess at 8:50 p.m. Me meeting reconvened at gitO p.m.
with all members or the Council and staff present.
7. COVNCTI. PnSTME.R9
7A. DIRECT ELECTION OF MAYOR Report from the Citizens Advisory Commission
WAS presented by Jim Robinson.
Mayor Mikels asked Mr. Gracia, Somber of the CAC, if he had any further Input
from the CAC meeting. Mr. Creole stated he was one of the commissioners who
voted to have an elected mayor. •
Paul Saidana, member of the CAC, stated he was in opposition to an elected
mayor. He said he was conducting a survey, but It Wasn't complete and had
nothing to report at the present thee.
Mayor Mikele opened the meeting far public input. Marc being none, the
public portion of the meeting Was closed.
After Nether discussion Council concurred not to Waste any Nether time on
the item.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to defer the Item until a later
time. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
7B. PARX3 COMMISSION Staff report by Bill Holley,
Mayor MSkels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council Was:
ANacho Oracia who felt a Parks Commission would be appropriate because it
would be able to concentrate all efforts on one item.
Mr. BuMuet stated it was his intent to have thla body from the CAC report to
the Council, not to the CAC.
Mr. Dahl stated he was not I agreement With this. He felt that a Commission
from the CAC would be better. Also, he favored them having their own meeting
time and not have it on a back -to -back basis with the CAC.
W. Frost felt that there still was a need to form a group or interested
people on a .short -term basis for concentrated efforts.
a
yt��
•
• City Council Minutes
November 17, 1152
Page 7
Notice: Moved by Dahl, seconded by SChloaser to farm a Parks Advicer7
Committee to report to the Council with appointments coming frcn the CPC;
be a five member body; and the meeting time be separate from the CAC with
time to be determined by the Council; be held as public meet.ngs with cce
member from each of the three communities, with members serving a. the
pleasure of the council.
Mr. Frost asked if composition of the committee should be included under
separate mC tion because the language doesn *t seek balance such as dlstribut'an
of members. Mr. Frost stated he wanted to seek two additional members from
the general public for this Committee.
Mr. Baguet stated that he would not want to get off In another d}scussion, but
to stick to the motion on the floor.
Mayor Mikels stated that we would reserve for the future a change in the
committee makeup.
Notion carried unanimously 5 -0.
7C. ADDITIONAL ITEM Mr. Schlosser inquired Into the abandoned orchard above
Banyan and what has been done about it. Mr. Robinson stated the Agriculture
Department gave the owner the option to clear the land. It has gone beyond
the length of time stated In the Ordinance however. The County Is about to go
In and clear the land at a coat to the owner of about 110 to $20,000.
g. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to adjourn, not
. to reconvene. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:75
P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
r ,
u
Ell
V
_ R867- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARR 1 YEN 1 Y E N C 0 R N A M E
0
WARRANT RECONCILIATION
WARR JOURNAL
DATE REFERENCE
12i15i8z
DISCOUNT
NET
290.05
1, SOo.00
120.00
120.00
162.00
162.00
300.00
31.00
2,1166 .00
30.00
50.00
9 305.16
21.00
2.116.00
4,250.50
51.00
31.00
3,206.83
5r 806.93
1.823.35
1,478.32
0
PALE
I
`i
R867 CITY OF RANC19 CUCAMONGA
WARA A VEN A V E N C O R N A N E
0
WARRANT RECONCILIATICN
WARR JOURNAL
OATS REFCRENCE
12/15/82
DISCOUNT
FINAL TOTALS
NET
125.00
74.86
13.28
66.00
113.71
167.98
103.33
50.00
965.78
7.50
8.75
5.965.00
45.00
16.30
200.00
25.00
210.821.42
61.75
21286.17 10.7
31.36
88.00
3.982.24
139.08
8.647.12
77.13
3.118.00
195.97
397.50
14.00
500.00
77.00
35.00
700.00
99.42
1.182.38
72.38
825.00
5.00
15.00
5.00
5.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
322.671.63
0
CAGE
2
I
C
•
(OPY..
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC IEVERAGF LICENSE(S)TI.
TYPF151 OF LICENSfIS)
FILE NO
T< O<......r el AlwM1aln M —.1 Coerrvl
RFCEIPI NO
I", orvvd.rey
011 memv, C.0, P'B18
CODE ..
N. ondern9^<d berebe o"L" for
Dvu
Ireemv duevbed m follow:
luoed
Temv P <rmrl
1. NAMEIS) OF APPLICANTIS)
Applied uodb See, 21044 Cl
:l.c11 %; •:.,E- 1
Exeo —Dme_ ;'.1 ^.]^
ENen.< D.1,
S, 119FI31 Of TRANSACTION(S)
FFE
N<.
!'PE
- -_
—
E
5 Lo1.11 n vl Bu men- �NOmber and Srreel
cev n +d Lp cede
o til 3.1
TNa OTAL
d II P[^•'«, ..[ %f<d, .,3 -i L'19:17 ).A /e I—de
P.emna -y
5!a.- lype vl0[vnf< See Im,It+
B Mm d Add-11 nl 2•,111 v! From 51- Number pod Slrex me ✓uw
q xo.e Y.. 1 been 1—cled of a EIII 10 N ,e Y,, 1- -1.1,d a , of the 1—cept of the AI[oI
• N frple• "" �' E.. roge
All o/ qm f he Oepenm<t Po t9_ tM1e Atli
a Y$v <r
b rlem{ q o/ 10 an ve vrle<Fm1e1 ,•hi[h thvll be deemed peN of thi{ vpph[nh<n.
I} P. pl [•tnl agr«t 1 lhet ony m naq<r employed In tel< h[en ed prem ., v,II Fe v[ ell the ve l'f,[e h<,{ vl . II[e e, end
'S
110212 e —.11111 vvivlvly e1 [eu{e o1 perm,t 1< be v,aleted eny vl 1M1e preneon{ <I Ih< AI[vM1d,[phe,e/vy< C_Oelrol All.
13 SIAIE Of CALIFORNIA C...' .1 ']:I i:ulaa[3i �O pole
If e,PPpIICANIr,-
...1/... w ,...•.r., nr .xw ra ....n.r .r..+� »• 14 -uw,.- b .w• 1w ...r,... x .r. Ls. -A .. 1 -1-
SIGN NERE �� '-
APPLICATION RT TRANSFEROR
S STATE Of CAIIFOPNIA Cooery el .a]p ..•unar'.11:e they _.
Id Nn,,• • e11 `,•,,, 91r__ry_ r_ • ••• o••• lI Sgeo 1<q1 vl L[,Itl _ ... � fB akrny Numbelyl
' - - -- -- CITY••Jf fIrLICHO PCAMOYGA
- Af$AINES 1114___."
MA PIA
__.
.e:,d.e s6<:� e1 a Z•v G�a. .... ee„eN
_ y
I).. \'ol 9 I,," IA., VA.,. 1'r,. VO,p ........ I',r EFely
Mm[nrA Pr[ad•d nmr[q
f dmory popes. -
r.,,
COPIES MArLFO
RED rl Eeee -.el I.. of oLli+,. Paid of +.a. d...o. .f ..L' OTrte eM1 - - r Ee[eipl Nee _
- - - -I
i
I
ai
dl
�21
c
N�
cv�
I
I
L - - - - -- 3AsCL,. 'ed - - - - - -
-iii, fkcdikif ( "gfy
`eAuo?i =2A is LoeArrb oal -dr /Jo.erdeAlr CcA?ve2
of TASeb"C V Ain LA2ueL,Aa) AueN4Q cv.T#i.J
-LAe 6rArre leas. Oew-ne,
`JPoG[(CT`? Oue2euTLk Eoueci a t?-)-'r
C,eu 94( nl LAA1 L�u6dZaQ nitxD Cammr2C,A(-
ADSACe r ?uaGrRfiFS CaefekTLa -Z0A)ed : Alard e-S
EAsr
2 -1
"...%
C -1
-- �PA22,0)6
C e.ed'f
��
nre¢
iiiteS,
Svgo use
n4wL (Fx,nu6)
Sour#
xem Fawn Lrs
I.0 esT
PM[x�N
SV,,iT
Bo.1
FG
KLYt
12 2AV ZA
sem3asel,ue.?.d qua
`Jhak
Ma,Lier
I
L - - - - -- 3AsCL,. 'ed - - - - - -
-iii, fkcdikif ( "gfy
`eAuo?i =2A is LoeArrb oal -dr /Jo.erdeAlr CcA?ve2
of TASeb"C V Ain LA2ueL,Aa) AueN4Q cv.T#i.J
-LAe 6rArre leas. Oew-ne,
`JPoG[(CT`? Oue2euTLk Eoueci a t?-)-'r
C,eu 94( nl LAA1 L�u6dZaQ nitxD Cammr2C,A(-
ADSACe r ?uaGrRfiFS CaefekTLa -Z0A)ed : Alard e-S
EAsr
2 -1
"...%
C -1
-- �PA22,0)6
v
Neil — x„x ar��
/
Cacn,c2AL ,IVeLTd
McJ. Dws,iJ'L -i✓-Du AG
v
n4wL (Fx,nu6)
Sour#
xem Fawn Lrs
I.0 esT
loWZ)eUG,rY ?- ✓t7wa�Ac
Bo.1
FG
nnh
12 2AV ZA
sem3asel,ue.?.d qua
L - - - - -- 3AsCL,. 'ed - - - - - -
-iii, fkcdikif ( "gfy
`eAuo?i =2A is LoeArrb oal -dr /Jo.erdeAlr CcA?ve2
of TASeb"C V Ain LA2ueL,Aa) AueN4Q cv.T#i.J
-LAe 6rArre leas. Oew-ne,
`JPoG[(CT`? Oue2euTLk Eoueci a t?-)-'r
C,eu 94( nl LAA1 L�u6dZaQ nitxD Cammr2C,A(-
ADSACe r ?uaGrRfiFS CaefekTLa -Z0A)ed : Alard e-S
EAsr
2 -1
Sark
C -1
we;r
R -1
/
Cacn,c2AL ,IVeLTd
McJ. Dws,iJ'L -i✓-Du AG
EAsr
n4wL (Fx,nu6)
Sour#
Orgene
I.0 esT
loWZ)eUG,rY ?- ✓t7wa�Ac
0
•
•
l_I
COPY"..... a r.:..
IMw IF;.
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSEI51
To Drpanm<m al M,ehoer U-11 Ca l
1901 a -,F"
SaramrMo. CaId. 95818 -
»v..o.r..•.. we.non -
Th. onderugnd AerrhF .,,4, for
Loma dnobW m!a!la.n
I. TYPES) OF LICENSE(SI
PlE NO.
...
..
-
APPred ..de, Sea. 2404 ❑
Flfab.e Col. tO I
RFCbeT NO _
GEOGRAPHICAL
CODE 1
_
Dare
pored
2 NAMfISI Of APPlICFNT15)
Lemp le,mil
Roca- Dal.
2, TYPEI51 Of 7RANSACTIONISI
FEE
IIC,
TYPE
4 FIT- .1 aI eal�_e.. 14 cete::�nn
01"i •Lamnnn
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOflGA
5 ni ft— -N-6 and SveeF
— FROMINISTF
AM Pll
Cny nni Zr' Cade Co..,
-- "_ _ I
T. vl Iaf212131 I
TOTAL
y _.) %...
p S Premre. l•eeed _ ], Aa. Pmnvev I.,A.
how froe N bCou G., Lmv?
_
E Mmn.q Add.eu nl 1,1-1 Ira. 5)— Nomber and SrrM
9. Ha.e YM, ..er bren weled al. fd-,? y 10 Na......... rialmed aa, of rbe Pr—I —1 of the Aleabol<
le.ernge Cnabal All ar regulauom of Ill. D.Focame r per
nlaq to If, All?
11, f.".. o "yf5" onv.<r to i1.- 9 w 10 on en almabmem vhrth lfP1I be deemed pall of Ibl appI .......
1) appl n e ag.rel (nl R anv m ae9m <.plaved m .da Famved p wdl Fa.e It Ih, qunl.k.a.., of a Iheevee. aad
'b' an .mlele o ar perar w be ..olmed a el me P of rbe Almnobe 8e.aa9. Ceeeol An,
cur be nr rsome ny .a.mem
O
13 STATE Of CA1'IOPNIA Co.., I 'r� ' -� OoN "
1e aPPIICArvT • • •r ... .n..l..n. iri •M m •....I...wx. «.+r ry �..unw. .. .n.• w..w...n v sr ..mow ..x. .. .r./.w Iwx.. n
"ON HC FE ,
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
5 suTE OF CADFORNIA Co.., of :1 q i u Dar. — — •
16_'a...•.11 11 •••elvin
_ ••••• r .. I ?- $gn1...B of Uu....f,) 18. Lae_l, Nomber(vl
; _.a
19 local- _ -- N'ob" nni Slr.el Cny and 1, Code Co..,
I'll ra, 11 all lb bar n... Lia' F.I. n..pa I -I r' Oldrl
Allo"Id Pem.d.d na
" M1Aur r PPen. _
❑ COPIES MAILED
Rm..el. Fn al `r.. .;Iadw ate•... f.:J i.7',I
❑ OTO m .. - Rnlpl No..
MM.•..... Ii wa1 a.lun.n.rw
C
COPY.....' .... — ...... .r1_e... e..,w.1r.A.. I--
pPP NTTN FOR F¢ONOLIC 6LVERAGE LICENSEI51
le D<rwrrr.rm of plmnoAr D<re.aye Comrol
Sann...nm, CoAI 9:9I4
nr•. rn nn..c.....mu
lM1..+d...ngr.rl le.rbr apPliar ler
r¢rr •r drrnd:w ur Innc.
1, "PE151 OF LICENSEI51
FILE NO
A'FI'Id vnd<r Se<, 21014 ❑
RECEIPT NO
OEOGr'AiM:CAI
CODE ISSj
Dore
L.urd
x. NAl'E's OF APPUCANT(S)
T<mp Permrr
D,,<
rFEE
_
]. IYPE :S) OF TRANSACTION *)
LIC.
"RE
T,-'.
Cm M
, h e of 9vrrn.r.
S Loa.: I ¢mmn._Number vnd SLen
Llr -,1 1 ^Ccd. Cwnry,
TOTAL
S ^
SI-n. Type 0; l.r Lia3<,1 213
0. :• •." Add :eu IT df'- „,I am S)- NombereM 51 rtel
Sti4: 0'ia •
9. Ne.e you <•er 6een <en.iaed al o leloeyl ID. No.e you evr n.I.IRd nny of de penuam P( the ALcl,.L<
• o /(. Der <ra9e Ceneal All III 1h....... e , per.
lernrn9lo the A<Il
I E.plem "y E5” a +.. +r ro nemr 9 er 10 an nn enalhmem .xid A.11 be deemed pon of rxn oppbmLan.
17, I'll .1, r+ rega <mplo,d m .mwle L[emee premne� .dl L." ell rxe pu.LLtm.om of a Veen a ..d
or ne_r Io be= clod ..y.( the Pra cl rxe AI<a•ex< 0eroraq< Comrol A I
u ST.Rf OF CAUMIFdA Cl "ry of muon Dm. 11/1]/62
Nv Ilf m(E '........r r ur .v.• .,• r...n.r .rm.......... •r _'AA... er .,a.. 1, All. rc...r . ...+.....,v ....a. r ...l.r. r.
A.
SIGN MEPE x /
/nC ... ... .,.
APPLICATION By
TRANSi[ROR
5 !r:AIE CE CAn10PI4rA Co"T,r of u.. 0 Dare 11 -Ib.u�
IG lin�.•.I.l l.r•n,.r-•'••,• • ei.rr••'r•• "17 $� ru_n(.I nl liar_ +r111 ,^ IS I.<— Nrnbrrlrl
1C
.. Act; 'Cl1O n _—
rl 1s, rr..r Nr.+xr, nra 5rrrrl „^ ril '1-
- - II
'•
A.'-"
G6 ir:rm�.:�:� " ,_nm.o ��c: :o::rt I'A ro'i , Y
n.rtr,ru'rrr.'merr „urrrcmn l ^. nr Prr .rrrnrll.r' OILR
ILgi2 /U /� /�I'V
❑ .,. ........ ....... ., . „ COPIES MAIRD . t t-
lJ Rere -el Reo�Sje.."t'9c:d el 0 °ae e^ ��'�7',A+ Pett}n NA
G.
.•1
r
LI
I ti
V
I
I �
Je,b:f.�� i � OLSLnXG
i
nIC� Sna Rea�k. �� ilcsmn.cn
I_ _- -_SFrJ � \�eIIGIJnIGD 1IJp F. o/ili_
-VACA1 Lb/
I i Lc,lu E'S r� Lcc/J:rfc cu d�c A/i�'7!1l ilST
ccCnuL of snu LrC /J /I;_'
-vin '2G /1IC' /IIJC Gieeve
Hucuue. GgOw6 h ✓e LeW6 -t4e WaJeL2u bouljL,4(2y
L_I Ue SeGAtmrwc. CLple,,-, d'Fj,o Cue.t"m,fi.
� u!�S, cT � Y2oPrr <t y L,Lf NTL i L."=1
/)
i'�/i'l, \/rr.,r i'JOrCVI I(` ��Ulld:P/.i7L`t' &d iLrI{le -S
F /157 R -3
wrcr /C,7s' fau)Dn v
/
rleuren( "PLilnl lJo:.7d�aF�rr � amnion(
f/i'ST / Ind. 1"J"n,
q -lJ
toul / Zew r/i %JSI%y
Z -d �u'G�IJG'l
wl
I
0
•
r1
iJ
•
C
P
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Terry Nemer, Traffic Analyst
GAO GOCAb1pl,C9
fm5 -
c t, o
F � Z
1977
SUBJECT: Approval of Changes to the Urbanized Boundaries and the
Federal Aid Urban System
The 1900 Federal Census designated Rancho Cucamonga as an
urbanized area as it achieved a population over 50,000 within the
incorporated city limits. In 1970, the urbanized area did not
include all areas within the present city limits. The previous
boundary ended at Haven Avenue to the east and at Banyan to the
north. The new urbanized area limits must conform to present
city limits and must be approved by resolution of the Council.
Exhibit A (a map available in the Council Chambers) shows
previously approved and proposed urban boundaries for western San
Bernardino County and Rancho Cucamonga in particular.
The Federal Aid Urban (FAU) system includes designated arterial
and collector routes within urbanized areas. FAU routes are
designated based on their anticipated functional usage five to
ten years in the future. Funding is available from the federal
government (Federal Aid Highway Acts of 1970,1973,1976 and 1978)
for traffic signal installation, construction of roads, fixed
rail facilities, bicycle facilities, bus lanes, pedestrian walk-
ways, rail, bus and demand responsive vehicles and other
projects. A street must be designated as a FAU route to obtain
funding allocated for urban routes. Exhibits A and 8 indicate
proposed changes to the FAU system. Arterials previously outside
the urbanized area which were Federal Aid Primary or Federal Aid
Secondary (Base Line, East Ave., Arrow Rte. and Route 30) or
proposed arterials (Milliken Ave.) are recommended to become FAU
routes. The City Council must approve recommended changes to the
FAU system. Ultimate designations are approved by the Federal
Highway Administration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution approving changes to
the Urbanized Boundaries and the Federal Aid Urban System.
Res 6ytfully su /omitted,
6
1
0
EXHIBIT B
FEDERAL AID. SYSTEM
COUNTY SAc 'EeCharnino FAS F, FA U ® URBAN AREA Loe AnReleS-LOee Beach N0. 3041
STREET /HUAD NAME
TERMINI -
LENGTH 1 1100 MILE
MAP
SHEET
NUMBER
"UN_1'IOMAL CLASSIFICATIUII
EXISTING'
SYSTEM I EXISTING FROPOSEO
FSCS POH JUA /5/
FROM
TO
STATE-
OUIITI
CITT
TOTAL
13th Street (Route 30)
700' u/0 Sapphire St.
Haven Avenue
2.950
2.950
1014 -14V
5 FAP 1Prio Art IV
irin Art IV
Milliken Avenue
4th Street
Highland Ave. (Rte. 30)
4.000
4.000
14V15
I
rin Art IV
Eas[ Avan.,e
Foothill Blvd. (Rte. 30)
Highland Ave. (Rte. 30)
2.000
2.000
14V15
CollSelec Minor Art
Iinor Ar[
Hi nlano fence (ate. 30)
Haven Avenue
Route 15
.550
4.550
14V15
FAP Prin Art IV
Irin Art IV
Haven Avenue
Route 15
3.500
3.500
14V15
FAS Prin Art IV
3rin Art IV
Arrow Route
Haven Avenue
Etiwanda Avenue
3.000
3.000
14V15
FAP I Minor Art
11nor Art
r
191h Street
Highland Avenue
.250
250
14B16
FAS trio Art [V
rin Art IV
�
i_
• RESOLUTION NO. S �2 - v?G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN ROADS TO BE IN
THE FEDERAL -AID URBAN SYSTEM
WHEREAS, under regulations issued by the Secretary of Transportation
under the Federal -Aid Highway .Act (Title 23 U.S. Code), the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the concurrence of the California Department
of Transportation, has been designated to select a Federal -Aid Urban System in
this City.
NN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga that:
This Council concurs in and approves the roads and all
urbanized boundary changes made necessary by the 1980
census as graphically shown on Exhibit "A" and as
designated in Exhibit "B" (all exhibits being attached
hereto and hereby made a part of this resolution) as
additions to the Federal -Aid Urban System eligible for
Federal -Aid Urban System eligible for Federal -Aid in the
• City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, subject to
the concurrence of the California Department of
Transportation and approval of the Federal Highway
Administration.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. 'Aasserman, CiLy Clerk
6
O
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
• =December 2
TO: City Council and City Manager U�_
io
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
By: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Agreement for 9757 Liberty Street submitted by Ray
and Nancy Jones
Mr, and Mrs. Jones, property owners, have applied for a building
permit to construct a dwelling unit on the property 'at 9757
Liberty Street. The property does not front upon any public
street. The access to the lot is provided from Lemon Avenue by
an unpaved access through private easements among the adjacent
property owners.
As a prerequisite to issuance of building permit for landlocked
parcels as established by City Council Resolution No. 80 -38, an
• irrevocable offer of dedication on the portion of the access for
street purposes and a lien agreement for future improvements of
the street are required.
The document for the offer of dedication for that portion of
Liberty Street has been previously executed and Mr, and Mrs.
Jones have entered into a lien agreement to provide the required
street improvements at some future date to be determined by the
City.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign the
lien agreement on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:JS:jaa
61
Attachments
11
W
0
J
0
Pvn -rECT
CITY OP RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA
1zJi * ENGINEERING DIV
DIVISION
VICINITY NIAP
,9n
rE
tit
Page
• RESOLUTION NO. * Z�2 — -� G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RAY AND
NANCY JONES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked
parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and
WHEREAS, 9757 Liberty Street, located north of Leman Avenue,between
Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue is a Landlocked Parcel within the meaning
of said Resolution No. 80 -38; and
WHEREAS, Ray and Nancy Jones have executed a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
• same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Le I
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
•
�1
�I
n TMv nT. n n TTnvn OTTO n "nATO n
STAFF REPORT
Y
Ie %T
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY: Tim J. Beadle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY REGARDING COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE BOND FOR MUL I L'c
AMLY RESID NTIAL PROJECTS IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The County of San Bernardino is asking for the City to complete a cooperation
agreement :ihich provides for the County to act as an issuing authority for a
multiple family housing mortgage revenue bond. This bond issue will be used
to help finance the construction of a residential project located east of 19th
Street and Archibald Avenue consisting of approximately 200 units which has
been approved through the City's Development Review process.
The agreement is necessary in order for a County agency to assume the
responsibility of the issuing authority for mortgage bonds. The City of
Rancho Cucamonga, because it is involved in an SB 99 housing mortgage bond, is
unable to devote its staff services at this time to provide for this
particular issue. The developer, who needs to receive the financing as soon
as possible, has requested that the county act as the issuing authority.
The agreement provides for the following:
1. The County is to act as the issuing authority for this particular
bond.
2. The project proposed for construction is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. The City will do nothing to adversely affect the rating on the bond.
Other parts of the agreement are more standardized in order to assure an
effective cooperation agreement. Staff has reviewed the agreement and finds
it similar to other agreements between the City and San Bernardino County on
County mortgage bond issues used in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1,7,
Cooperation Agreement
City Council Agenda
December 15, 1982
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement
and direct the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Respectful l.l' submitted,
~JA L , AIC
Community Development Director
JL:TJB:jr
Attachments
11
•
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ENVIRONMENTAL
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
§'
are Mill Street •San Bernardino, CA 92415 •(714( 363 DON NEWCOME 2745 \ \mow Director
December 3, 1982
Honorable John D. Mikels
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9310 Baseline - Unit A
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mayor Mikels:
A'e respectfully request that the attached Cooperative Agreement
between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga be placed on your council agenda for December 15, 1982.
The execution of this Cooperation Agreement will allow the County
of San Bernardino to issue tax - exempt mortgage revenue bonds for
• a 200 unit multi - family housing project to be constructed within
your city. This project is to be constructed, owned and operated
by Fredricks Development Company.
If you or your staff have any questions concerning this Coopera-
tive Agreement or the project, please contact Pamela Newcomb of
my office at (714) 383 -3764.
Sincerely,
e T:1L P BLIC IvORKS AGENCY
C0\ ITY DF,VELO PDIENT
DON NEWCOME, Director
DN:PN:cm
Attnchment
cc: Tim Beedle
L.'. r1 l'l'er.:
1
• COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (the "Cooperative Agreement') is hereby
made and entered into as of , 1982 by and between the COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision and body corporate and politic of the State of
California (the "County'), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation of the State of California (the "City').
W ITN E S S T H:
wHERF,AS, the County has determined to engage in a multifamily residential
financing program (the "Program') pursuant to Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 91 of the
Ifealth and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act ") to make or acquire,
directly or indirectly, construction loans and mortgage loans to housing sponsors to
• finance the construction or development of multifamily rental housing in the County, all
as provided for in said Act; and
WHEREAS, Don Miguel Investments, Ltd, a limited partnership of which
Fredricks Development Company is the general partner (the "Owner°) proposes to
construct, own and operate a multi - family housing project consisting of 200 units (the
"Project ") designated for occupancy by persons of low and moderate income to be located
in the City; and
Project; unit
w HEREAS, the County proposes to provide financing in connection with the
WHEREAS, tile. City desires to cooperate with the County pursuant to the
Act in the exm•cise of their powers under the Act for the purposes of the Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration Of the mutual covenants hereinafter
provided, the parties hereto agree its follows:
SECTION 1: The words and phrases of this Cooperative Agreement shall, for
all purposes hereof unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings assigned to such
words and phrases in the Act.
IS
SECTION 2: The County is hereby authorized to exercise its powers under 0
the Act within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, during the term of this Agreement for
the purpose of providing financing in connection with the Project.
SECTION 3: The City represents and warrants to the County that: (i) the
City has heretofore adopted a General Plan for the City in conformance with the
provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law of the State of California (Government Code
Sections 6500 et seq.), (ii) said General Plan includes a land use element and a housing
element as required by Government Code Section 65302, and (iii) the Program complies
with said land use element and housing element.
SECTION 4: The City further agrees to refrain from taking any action which
would to its knowledge tend to adversely affect the rating on any notes or bonds issued
by County pursuant to this agreement.
SECTION 5: Nothing in this Cooperative Agreement shall prevent the
County from entering into one or more agreements with other municipal corporations •
within the County, if deemed necessary and advisable to do so by the County.
SECTION 6: This Cooperative Agreement may be amended by one or more
supplemental agreements executed by the County and the City at any time, except that
no such amendment or supplement shall be made which shall adversely affect the rights
of the holders of any of the notes or bonds issued by the County.
SECTION 7: Subject to the continuing responsibilities of County with
respect to any existing agreement relating to the Project for which financing has been
provided pursuant to the Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by either party
upon 30 days written notice.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Cooperative
Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly
uuthow(al, and their official seals to be hereto affixed, all as of the day first above •
written.
ly
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
County Counsel
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
11
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By
Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0
•
12
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for approval of right -of -way documents for
final remaining parcels in Assessment District 8'2 -1
Items submitted for City Council approval acceptance are as follows:
1. Offer of Dedication for right -of -way for a portion of 6th St.;
2. Offer of Dedication for storm drain right -of -way along Haven Ave.;
3. Easement Agreement for the purchase of the above listed storm
drain easement, to be paid from AD 82 -1 right -of -way funds in
the amount of $13,175;
4. Escrow instruction for a previously approved right -of -way pur-
chase, authorizing a closing date of not prior to Jan. 3, 1983;
S. Offer of Dedication for right -of -way for a portion of 6th St.
and Buffalo Ave.
A resolution for acceptance of the offers of dedication is attached
for your approval. The documents presented for approval in this re-
port are the last of those needed to clear all right -of -way for
AD 82 -1, other than a single condemnation action which is in progress.
Where construction is underway on the parcels involved, rights of
entry are on file.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached Easement Agreement and Escrow
Instruction be approved and that the attached resolution accepting
the listed offers of dedication also be approved.
IR/ /�
�
lly m , ted
` - �.BIP
Attachments
17
r
AECOROING REQUESTED BY 82-213100
CITY OF WEND CUCAMONGA
MEN RECORDED MAIL TO C= f,�9�:� iii Of: i,II!i C'± ,�.iS
CI iY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCN3O r,,7 In 1?0= AT i
1. 0. CUCAMONGA. a 91730 p❑
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINO FOR RECORDER'S USE
PROJECT:
Ms ,,Itment District 79 -1
A.P.e: P/0229- 261 -11, 12
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
V FOR A VALUVI CONSIDERATION, receipt of Mib is hereby 4ctnowla1,od,RICHAPn A. MEPIDZ-
I a /k /aRMHAW A. MEREDITH and JACOVELINE MEREDITH; RETINA C. HDYT; JAVES E. CROSS;
ROBERT S. HARRINGTONI R09ERT J. LIECHTI; GARY DONALD AGE; GAIL GLASS AGE, trustee
and RICHARD H. WAGNER, trustee
do_ hereby lramably offer to dedicate to the CITY OF AMONG CUCAMONGA an
eas .,tt for goad and Public utility pas roo . Ai
Q0 n, aver, upon and across the ra pr.Dertf• Cf iY a ancho uunonga. in the 3V
County M San Bernardine. State of California, described a C
rw
• Th at porti•m of Lots 37 and 3B, Rochester, in the City of Ga ncho Cucamonga, F!
County of San Bernardino. State of California, a per map recorded in Bpok 9. CGA
paye 20 of Maps in the office of Me County Recorder of said County described I$
.glows:
Beginning It the Northeast corner of said Lot 37; thence Soutb 89' 45' V-
West along the North line of said Lot 33 a distance of 905.24 feet to A point on
a curve wnave Southeasterly having radius of 590.00 feet a radial line from
said point bears North 18. 45' 26• West; thence SnutFoasterly along said curve
through a antral angle of 52. 34' 45• an arc length of 532,25 feet to the west
line of said Lot 30; thence Southerly along said vest line Sncth 00e 09' IS-
Wes[ 298.36 feet to the SoutMat corner of said Let 38; thence Borth 39' 43' 17'
East along the South line of said Lot 38 A distance of 38,00 feet; thence North
00. 09' III East 114.51 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave South-
easterly having a radius of 520.00 feet: thence Northeasterly along said curve
through a central angle of 89' 35' 43• an arc length of 813.15 feet to a tangent
'line; thence North 89' 45' 05- East along last mentioned tangent tine 320.90 feet
to the East line of said Lot 37; thence north 00. 11' 06" East along said East
,line 30.00 feet to the point of beginnino.
This irrevocable offer Is made pursuant to Section 1050 of the Government
Cadd. Said offer 0111 be bi Ming upon the grantor, hi, heirs. successors and
ssngns d thall continue to full force and effect until said dedi cot ion is
accrpted by the City Cooncll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or any Public body
having jurisdiction or until the right to aCapt bas been abandoned by the City
[ou ncil or by the public body having Jurisdiction in the manner Or A,Ori bed Inn
the bandoment or vacation of treat$ and highways by Part 3 of Division 9 or by
Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Streets and Hi9Mays Code, Mfch ever Is applicable.
—7); rr
Al cne rd A. Me redditth rl "rlV—g[.t(o.4n_L /y Alchard H. Wagne , trustee
a..d.,quellnp Mdredltp Robert J, jmitl r
Bye ti nae ti na C. NoYt �Garyi DOnab Lag,
Janes aE. [roil LaI lass
-I e, tru$Ne'
NOTE: Acknowledgement forms be reverse side
� v �
G
RECGAGING PE71ESTEO BY
CITY Jr RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NNEN RECIROEO MAIL TO
CITY CLERK
CITY Or RANCHO C'JCARDNGA
P.O. BOt 807
RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CA 91110
SPACE ASOVE THIS L11I T'rix HG IROER'S USE
PROJECT:
Ass SCSS:rent District a2 -1
A.P.Y. PTN 209-411-13
IRREVOCABLE OEF.H TO DEDICATE
FOR A VALUABLE 04SIOERATIO4, recelpt of Mich Is he ^eby acknavledged,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPERTIES, A Caiifo ^nia MAited par[nen M1ip
do_ hereby irrevocably offer to dedicate t0 the CITY OF MINI) CUCAM@IGA an
re
eascot for stem d-ain w:noses _
upon and across the YAl prerty. City of RanehO CYeadloga, irl :ne
County of San aera"ino, State of Califonnla. Inscribed as
The Westerly 25.00 feet of Pa -cel I of Parcel Map No. 6544,
in the City of Rancho CJCano,lga, County of San Bernardino, State
of CalifOrnla, as pe^ ea? - eco,sed in Book 56 of Pages 63 and 64 •
If Parcel Maps, 1. the office of the County Recorder of said
County.
This i- revocable offer is rmde pu^suant to Section 7050 of the Govenreent
'Mo.
Said offer shell be binding upon the g-an Wr, his heirs. su<cesimn and
assigns and shall continue in fall force and effect until said '1edicatlon is
acceptM by the City Council of tie City Of Rancho Cucamonga or any public body
havin) Irrnlsdictlon on rintll the night to accept has been abandoned by the City
Council o- by Vie ;011c nd, 4vwg Ju-'Ad Ktlnn In th, nano,- prescribed for
the AbJOdm,sont on vacation of st^,ets and h196eayv by Part l of fllvislon 9 dr by
Chapte- P of Olvlsinn 2 of the Streets and Highways Cole, Althaver Is applicable.
RAYCHO CUCNIONGA PROPERTIES, a Cali fn ^nie Llmlted pa ^[na^vhip
..— — ......
�_.- �.n_ ^_-�
NOTL: AUnnaledge,lent fo•ns on reverse side
L- - fi1r a0
.. RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this SC& day of ti najte.
19121 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCNMONGA (hereinafter
referred to as the "CITY ") and
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPERTIES,
a California Limited Partnership
(hereinafter referred to ds "OWNER ".)
RECITALS
•
WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY has famed an assessment district
under the terns and provisions of the "Municipal Lmprovanents Act
of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and iighways Code of the
State of California, for the construction of certain public wo -ks of
impr'ovenents, together with acquisition, which the public interest
and necessity requires. Said special assess -rent district is known
and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82.1 (here-
inafter - eferred to as the "DISTRICT "); and
WHEREAS, said public Improvements a -e planned and located in a
manner which is amPatible with the greatest public good and the least
p -irate injury; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY a -e desirous at this tine to ag•ee
as to Um terns of acquisition (If the he- vinafta- lesc'ihed propo -ty
interesti; and
WHEREAS, It is desi -able that CITY lcl,i -e possession if the
fol lowing desc -,bed v)pooty befo "e tine curet- uction of the p- n) mej
Cons t-ucti no.
MOIL THEREFORE, IT IS HERL'lY MUTUALLY AGREF,II IIY THE PARTIES
IIERCTD, AS FOLLOWS:
Page 1 of g
all,
al
AGR°EIENT 6
1. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY
agrees and needs to acquire, that ce•tain parcel of property and right -
of -way situattal in the County of San gena -dlno, State of California,
as sit forth and described in Exhibit "A ', attached hereto, - eferenced
and so incorporated.
2. That the purchase price fo• said Easment is hereby agrexJ to be
the sam of $ 1117S.nn , said amount payable upon receipt of money
from sale of bonds issued by or on behalf of City. It is hereby fu -t'ner
acknowledged and approved that all casts of acquisition of said easement
under this Agreement are to be spread over benefited prop:rties in the
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT pursuant to the provisions of law.
3. Immediately upon execution of this Agreenent the OWNER and the
CITY further agree that t'ne CITY will record at no cost to OWNER such
Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate, deed or deeds and any other inst -mnent
necessary to effect the Easement as herein granted. •
4. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the obli-
gation of CITY Hereunder includes consideratlan to OWNER for all coepensible
items for the property, including the value of the part taken, improve-
ments, if any, costs and any damages to which OWNER may be entitled by
law o- otherwise.
S. in the event the beneficiary under any trust decd affecting the
easement area demands, in writing, that compensation being paid be applied
to the existing loan, the City of Rancho Cur, Onga shall forward that compen-
sation to the beneficiary for application to th,! loan, with written notice
to the uncle -signed.
6. It is unde ^stood and am-eed by the parties hereto in connection
with ice exe•clse of City'; rights d ^anted he^e.n, City shall •estn ^e and
replace surface of the property to the condition in which it existed prior
to the xc -ciie of City's •i ghts herein g- anted.
Page 2 of 3 •
M. 2 �L
E
7. The terns and conditions of this A,etment snail run to the
Eenef it of and shall be binding upon the pe rti es 'ne-et0, thei- 4ei -5,
exec lit e^5, admi nl s tra to^ , Sucee5so -S, assigns, legal "eyesentatl'v ?s and
all other interested pen ,n5.
3. 'Upon execution of this Agreement, and I - ev)cable Offe• to
Dedicate, the I rrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall be acordef in the
Office Of the County Recvder. Upon confi,ation of the DISTRICT and
the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer by Resolution.,
IN WITNESS MHEREOi the parties hereto execute this Ag- eeient on the
day and in the year first hereinabo�e ,citten.
5rxm nr r.n'upu, "` 0Ad)LE
RMCdO CUCAJ40NGA PROPERTIES,
a California Limited Partne ^e'uip
BY
By
By' — '-- --- ---
By.
BY: _._.
CITY OF RMCN0 CUCAMONGA
S rnuw, rr
r..
' ... •rn �, ^u
i. Igtl2 rTro m ✓ru ra
In
4''i;x
J011:1 r,. ` /ALC:IT 1 v'm
".n n ,.room r "• •• `•
\I PART C4rvll f \',10 L. \9nV , \PnPYl lit l':5
\JnI:WI
.r. YXIM V 1I t I:n I ANL f t'll L
„rrl^,
noa,..,.nx
PNYLLIS AYA
"l
vr�n
50S ;N
r'
ur.
�
wnau .,.r'n,
„mss 5a.rr
,r^^rr
�mn✓\Mneen ls.INl
,n „— ,.
RECORDING REUUESTEO BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUC44ONGA
P.O. BOX 907
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
SPACE AHUVE ?Hi5 LIN FO:i RECORDER'S JSE
PROJECT:
Ass4ess. ^e0[ District 82 -1
A.P.l: PTN 209 - 411 -13
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPERTIES, a California Limited Partnership
do_ hereby irrefocably offer to dedicate to the Clr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA an
easement for store d ^d In 00'DOSfS
in, over, upon and across the real property, City of Rancho Ci camonga n the
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as
The Westerly 25.00 feet of Parcel I of Parcel Yap No. 6544,
in the City of Rancho ,acarchga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California, as per map recorded in Book 56 of Pages 63 and 64
of Parcel Naps, in the office of the County Recorder of said
County.
•
This irrevocable offer is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Government
Code. Said offer shall he binding upon the grantor, his heirs, successors and
assigns and shall continue in full force and effect until said dedication is
accepted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 0- any public body
having jurisdiction or until the right to accept has been abaiiianef by the City
Council or by the public body havinn3 jurisdiction in the manner presc -ibed for
t'me dbandnmemt or va:atihn of streets and highways by Part 3 of Division 9 or by
Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Streets and Highways Code, whichever is applicable.
RANCHO �UUCAM.,UUNNNGGA PROPERTIES, a California Limited Partnership
_70
NOTE: Acknowletgenent foams on ^¢verse side
EXHIBIT a, it
P
�i
MORTON C, DEVOR
ms�.e s, uwow.. c me
October 27, 1982
Title Insurance and Trust Company
P.C. Box 921
San Bernardino, CA 92304
Attention: Theresa Nor1
RE: 020305 IN
Dear Ms. Nori:
is The Sellers in the above escrow, Blicdell,
Goicmb and Devor, hereb request that the escrow
close on, but not before, January 3, 1903.
Your attention in this natter is aPpreciated.
Yours very /truly,
zP
Morton C. Devor
MCD /id
TO: TITLE 1:;SUEANCE AND TRUST COMPANY ^escrow ao. 920305 -TN
340 Four:: SL, P.O. 30N 921
San Eereardino, CA 92403 Date: Oct. 29, 1992
The undersigned hereby approves the above instruction that
escrow shall close on, but not before, January 3, 1903.
CITY OF P.ANCNO CUCAPONGA, a Municipal Corporation
r
by:
President
r
b _ OCT
y, 9u("
Sec re tart Kr�,p: ^ »q
•
1
—�RECGROI% REQUESTED BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
•
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCABONGA
P.O. BOX 807
RANCHO CUCWUNGA, CA 91730
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECOR FV U
PROJECT:
Asssessment District 82 -1
A.P.it:
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
R. C. LAND COMPANY, a California General Partnership
dog_ hereby irrevocably offer to dedicate to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA an
easement for road and Public utility purposes
I-, over, upon and across the real property, City of Rancho Cucamonga, in the
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as
See attached, Exhibit "A ", for legal description.
•
This irrevocable offer is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Goverment
Cade. Said offer shall be binding upon the grantor, his heirs, successor and
dssigns and shall continue in fuil force and effect until said dedication is
accepted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or any Public body
having jurisdiction or until the right to accept has been abandoned by the City
Council or by the public Iy0y having ,Jurisdiction in the manner prescribed for
the abamdoment or vacation of streets and highways by Part 3 of Division 9 or by
Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Streets and Highways Code, whichever is applicdble.
R. C. LAND COMPANY,
a California General Par ship
NOTE: Acknowledgement forms on reverse side
e
E %HIBIT "R"
That portion of Lot 1 in Tract No. 2205, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 34, Page 64 of Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder of said County described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South
89' 40' 45" West along the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 53.19
feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; said point
being on a curve concave Southwesterly having a radius of 270.00 feet
a radial line through said point bears North 66' 14' 10" East; thence,
Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 22' 16' 59"
an arc length of 105.01 feet to a tangent line; thence North 46' 02' 49"
West along said tangent line 54.81 feet to a point on a curve concave
Northwesterly having a radius of 580.00 feet, a radial line from said
last mentioned point bears North 43' 04' 55" West; thence Southwesterly
along said last mentioned curve through a central angle of 24' 15' 09"
an arc length of 245.51 feet to said South line of Lot 1; thence North
89' 40' 45" East along said South line 79.70 feet to a point on a curve
• concave Northwesterly having a radius of 610.00 feet, a radial line from
said last mentioned point bears North 18' 49' 46" West; thence North-
easterly along said last mentioned curve through a central angle of
13' 23' 52" an arc length of 142.64 feet to the beginning of a reverse
curve concave Southerly having a radius of 24.00 feet; thence Easterly
and Southeasterly along said reverse curve through a central angle of
83' 17' 50" an arc length of 34.89 feet to the beginning of a tangent
line; thence South 46' 02' 49" East along said last mentioned tangent
line 4.36 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly
having - ••alus of 250.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along said last
mentioned curve through a central angle of 20' 16' 48" an arc length of
88.49 feet to said South line of Lot 1; thence North 89' 40' 45" East
along said South line 21.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
As more particularly shown on the map attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Is
D7
a
s-
Wa
V1 J
/¢BUACALD AVE
NQ2'Gl9'18'E
645 - �� �e,0•
2797'
0.2OAc.
3 hl �
�Z � mLd
Kn
o3�' ,p ,ee'rr
a�Alao� � i 0)
a
� O �
I
w
N00'19' WIN
g
--- m
z
���!!!�J WILLOAN ASSOCIATES iA1�1�•IOO' o °rn 7I27IL12 CIt7 O/
W337- —rr4U-
�t / i50 Ha5wr�urr tN.ilE,uo I �.,,��Ld.M. �sou� I NANCNO CUCAYON O!
OIITNICT 79 1
pi01- BN -L�7 :HUOer TJ.A7. ,caw 61111
CURVE DATA
R
d L T
1 12 °16'59' 17000Gb 705.01'
2 10'16'48' 15a' 89.49' 04.7!'
3 830 17'500 . Lb' 3489'
1
4 13'Z3'6
2'
70.
1
5
14• u• 09•
�o.a7•
• RESOLUTION 10. * Lod' °fie
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR
STREETS AND STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
N0. 82 -1
follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as
WHEREAS, the City Engineer of said City did acknowledge those certain
Offers of Dedication, executed by R.C. Land Company, 'Wagner Community Property
Trust and Rancho Cucamonga Properties for Assessment District 82 -1.
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the said Offers of
Dedication be accepted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, that pursuant to provisions of Chapter
12.7 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of
California, the above - referenced Offers of Dedication are hereby accepted on
this 6th day of October, 1982.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982.
AYES:
,TOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren '4. '.4asserman, City Clerk
•
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
aj
0
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager 11
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer(//,
SUBJECT: Release of Bond and Notice of Completion
W 1>
ox
1977
Parcel Map 6322 (Gemco) - located on Foothill Blvd. east of Vineyard Ave.
Owner: Lewis Development Co.
1156 N. Mountain Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $223,000
The road improvements for the above referenced project have been constructed in
accordance with approved plans and it is recommended that City Council accept
said improvements, release the faithful performance bond and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
LBH:jaa
Attachments
3o
• RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office BOX 007
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which
interest or estate is: Lewis Development Co.
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Box
807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 15th day of December 19 82, there was com-
pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im-
provement set forth in the contract documents for
Parcel Map 6322 (Gemca)
4. The name of the Original contractor for the work of im-
peover,ent as a whole was Lewis Development Co.
The real property referred to herein is situated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California,
and is described as follows:
Parcel Map 6322 (Gemco) Foothill Blvd. east of Vineyard Avenue
The street address of said property is: lbcthill Blvd.
east Of Vlnevard Menu.
DATED: December 15 1982,
CITY OF M\NCHO CUCMONGA, a
municipal Corporation, Owner
A J'
BY:
(Title)
e)
-1-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) •
ss:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, says:
That the undersigned has read the foregoing Notice of
Completion an,: knows the contents thereof, and that the same
is true of the undersigned's own knowledge.
!Name)
(Title)
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this day of
19
Name,
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
u
_Z_
•
F " - 3 0,
RESOLUTION NO. * E. —a09
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 6322 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 6322
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15 day of December, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
40
Jan D. Mikels, Mayor
23
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
C�
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Loan to Redevelopment Agency to fund Day Creek Bureau of
Reclamation Grant
GuCA,Np,*V
a!' f
cJ o
F Z
U 15:
1977
4�.5c
Request authority to grant a ltS;OOnloan to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agnecy to fund subject grant application. Loan to be repaid in fiscal year
1983 -84.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the loan be approved.
Respegtfully submittgl,
E
LBH:Jad --
10
3H
0
C,
J
F
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 1982 >? p
F L
TO: City Council and City Manager `'-
19ii
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT Vacation of the service road located on the south side of Foothill
Blvd. in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Invest-
ment
The vacation of the frontage road located on the south side of Foothill Blvd.,
west of Ramona Ave. is required prior to recordation of Parcel Map 6114.
Vista Investment, developer of Parcel Map 6114, has requested additional time
to submit the map for final approval. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled
for the frontage road vacation should be continued until February 2, 1983, as
requested by the developer.
Posting and advertising for the public hearing has been completed.
RECOITIENDATION
It is recommended that City Council continue the public hearing until February
2, 1983, at which time Parcel Map 6114 will be submitted for final approval.
Re sp ctfully �ted,
LBN 7aa
Attachment
31
0
MONIVA
o --
Q :D
• 0D w
c� Q
C
FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD
Q
TI
�V
��1�1
1 ;2
Imo!
I
I IL
0
VACATION
No. 0-24
3(�
X24
I
�h
Z
125
I��
O2
2E w
Q
I
— I - --
zagl--
ghng
mer
PARCEL MAP 6114
improved commercial
----------
�—FOOTHILL BLVD.
7., �
n
E15I&
L. ITFS
ILLUSTRATIVE
4D SITE PLAN eyjs,iN single lamiy housing
lb,gend
7--
MA2
-.
exi,-,ing mcbile
ho� park
I
VICINITY MAP
MA2
-.
W
•
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -03 - BIDCAL - A
change of zone trom - (Single Family Residential) to R -3
(Multiple Family Residential) for 2.02 acres of land located on
the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street -
APN 202 - 131 -61 and 62.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, after reviewing this zone change
proposal and conducting a public hearing on November 10, 1982, adopted
Resolution 82 -105 recommending adoption of the above described zone change and
issuance of a Negative Declaration (Exhibit "A "). This zone change is needed
for the development of Tentative Tract 12256, a residential condominium
project of 25 units on 2.10 acres of land (Exhibits "B" and "C "). The
Planning Commission also approved the tentative tract map and related
Conditions of Approval at the November 10 meeting. Approval of this tract map
is contingent upon adoption of the zone change by the City Council.
The development proposal is located on three parcels, shown on Exhibit "0 ".
However, this zone change request covers only the two large lots. The small
remaining lot to the south is already zoned R -3.
Land surrounding the subject parcels is zoned R -3. The General Plan shows
that the project site is located along the dividing line between two land use
designations: Low Medium Density (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to the north;
and Medium Density (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) to the south. Bordering the
project site to the north and west is a mobile home park. A mix of older
single family and multi - family units exists on small residential lots south of
the project. On the east side of Archibald, across from the project site, is
an approved multi - family project.
Attached is a copy of the November 10, 1982 Planning Commission Staff Report
and Minutes. If the City Council concurs with the zone change, two actions
are required: (1) adoption of a Negative Declaration by Minute action; and,
(2) approval of the zone change through adoption of the attached Ordinance.
�s
Zone Change 82- 03 /Bidcal
City Council Agenda
December 15, 1982
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in The Daily Report newspaper
advertising this as a public hearing and notices were sent to all property
owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, no correspondence
regarding this zone change has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached
rdinance approving Zone Change 82 -03, and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Respectfully, submitted,
RICK OMEZ
CITY 'PLANNER
RG:CJ:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Initial Stun
Ordinance
9
- Location Map
- Tentative Tract Map 12256 •
- Detailed Site Plan
- Assessor's Map
ly, Part I
3 R
u
092211
RESIDENTIAL
L --- i
VERY LOW < 2 DUSAC
LOW 2-4 DU'S/AC
LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DU's/kC
MEDIUM 4-14 DU's/AC
MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24DU'S/AC
HIGH 24-30 DU'S/AC
MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
0
CITY OF
RANCH) CuC " K)N
MIA
NANNING DIVISION
TITLF:
EMIMIT: 'A" SCALE: MT,
1/0
INORT I i
"TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO 12256
lFIST ZO.YE 1' I •� •I' 11 . I,
VISTit; STFEET ~'
NORTI I
I
CITY OF ITEM! Z. . Fz -�3
R:1 \CI IO CLGU IQ \G:� TITI17� -T
PLANNING DIVISION I:XIIIhIi`�`." SC.V.r: N.cq.
W.
�f !
I L
C-L- io
�1
1 .
1\11 m
L E G E NO IjT In
MONTE Vl!;TA 5T;;F.ET
Ir
NORTI I
U�
PtNMI IN ACMCI P06 Ns.094k1 PATIO PZMCL
CITY OF I-ri"%I: 7.6. eO'cll
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: VET-All'Ev ILAM
ill-,\NNING DIVISION FAIIIIIIT: ttrr-s-
q�
4�
Rancho Cucamonga City 202-3 d
Tax Rate Area
15004 '
1
z
w
31
I
3J 35 I
37
39 4r 1 ODD 45
47
1 49
I
I
�
I
I
q
60'
T2 •ay 9Z ' 2�'
ii •r
'nl ++: Zs _�
M C(4 —n=
I 4�TA
STREET
32
34 36
36 40 42 44 46
I
46
6a S
1V
Su'1- LSE °� �J O'� (LEL,JfPr.
zcNE LHl�t6 °,
0
J
0
R
a
V
NORTI I
CITY OF ITEM: z.`
R.1 \CI X) CUC1WO)1GA
PLANNING DIVISION' IIrIT ' D` SCALD 1,L rS.
43
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• INITIAL STUDY
PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review'
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental
impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared,
or 3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning the
proposed project.
• PROJECT TITLE: ':ont'na 'Tista Estates
`J
APPLICANT'S NAPIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: - s1DC.1L :oro.
c 2-:
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: ':ernoi;i J :lore or Cases Andres
9531 Sancina Dr. Alta 7-0.F-a, La. . iui 7 ;4- 4c0202d: or 7'i,2j
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
:Iort:::;est Corner of Monte V .Ica and Ardnibald
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
co nir :<noaiad::a
1 -1
4q
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: - ,.e;;;,
0
atzacred ..ao. es fcr an al.e _ _ _ _ r:O' _wo
p -us 10!- ana Nee near lr C011 ::�'. c' , c7—= 7-7, Orl:'a La 3'II77
:,Iaxln5 4 oeneil -s Oi 150. area :-Ceniuies a.:a -_ _zz.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 2.10 acres, uxiscinl, mid _rar.e 'cldc=
d?prm:, 25v.: so rt. and Froposea tee, sc :o of nex
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT, SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTIING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)
=_o'it :_. _. sloe 2 acre site .r>o,e old _... ._..
, ^.d -ree= to - I =ee - ..nds - -..i, n'.ar r- 51
JO ?n1 - r_.` ,1. Stir or gceniC - octe It cr�rnersFOi :,rec: �•o'.7ertr.)Surrcux _ ^^. ^
0:
.'a5 -ar.'• _ _ _ an5 nat^ Old Car
r.C'iae and O]Gld'O t0 CC re: -owed G- ten ^:Its are 0:'P.ln'^ 1 ^d ] -: se*
T'+ C1ID so -le O' 6;:c ^ O "tied ^..:•
Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
..0. ', ):. :niwj.ed -e.
•
fII!
k/1
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
n_f:( 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
^_{ 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
�:.,..% 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.):
•``` 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
5. Remove any existing trees? How many?
y 6. Create the need for use or disposal of -
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
_
• "s -at>
n
U
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
Information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Signature
" Titler��
I -3
4("
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION •
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: ' -Iu� >L ?ecta 4 e tract :b. -.o
Specific Location of Project: :iort :rmst corner of Archi'cald and 7 ;onte
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units: 25 E:cae: ohasine to co detsz'iincd t:' _'lure de.te5
2. Number of multiple
family units: :lone
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: Se ?t•1i62
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model
and 4 of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Price Range
?!in ?cdrms 577,JJJ.uO
an -
} 1 - -4
n, V7
L
0
•
•
n,mv nU n n TTrvn OT Tr &A fn\Tr- n
STAFF REPORT
�z
Derr �
DATE: November 10, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -03 - SIDCAL -
A change of zore from R -1 Single Family Residential to
R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) for 2.02 acres of land
located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of
Monte Vista Street - APN 201- 131 -61 R 62.
Related File: Tentative Tract 12256
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone
is in conjunction with a twenty -five unit condominium project on 2.10
acres of land located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Monte Vista Street (Exhibit "A "). The development proposal, Tentative
Tract 12256, is also on the agenda this evening for your review and
consideration and is attached as Exhibits "B" and "C" A description
of the project is provided with the Tract Map Staff Report.
The development proposal is located on the three parcels shown on
Exhibit "D ". However, this zone change request covers only the two
large lots. The small lot to the south is already zoned R -3.
Land surrounding the subject parcels is zoned R -3. The General Plan
shows that the project site is located along the dividing lines between
two land use designations: Low Medium density (4 -8 du's /ac) to the north
and Medium Density (4 -14 du's /ac) to the south. Bordering the project
site to the north and west is a mobile home park. A mix of older
single family and nwlti- family units exist on small residential lots
south of the project. On the east side of Archibald, across from the
site, is an approved multi- family project.
ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accom-
modate the types of uses that would be permitted within the R -3 zone.
The zone change in conjunction with the development plans should pro-
vide an adequate trnnsit.ion between the mobile home park to the north
and west and the R -3 lots to the south. The change of zone and density
of 11.90 units per acre proposed development are also consistent with
the General Plan land use designations of Medium Density Residential
(4 -14 du's /acre).
49
ITEM F
Zone Change 82- 03 /Bidcal
Planning Commission Agenda •
November 10, 1982
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the
Applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has
completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no
adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this zone change. If
the Commission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declara-
tion would be in order.
FACTS FOR FINDING: The project site is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed lot size. The change of zone is consistent
with the General Plan and corresponding Tract Map and has a density
within the range allowed. The approval of this zone change will not
create adverse impacts on surrounding properties.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, and thirty -three property owners within
300 feet of the subject property have been notified. To date, no cor-
respondence related to the zone change has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
all input and elements relative to this project. If after such considera- •
tion the Commission can support the findings, adoption of the attached
Resolution would be appropriate.
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map 12256
Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Assessor's Map
Initial Study, Part I
Resolution of Approval
•
49
. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -106
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12256
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Mao No. 12256, hereinafter "Mao" submitted
by Bidcal Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a 2.10 acre site located on the northwest
corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street, into 1 lot, regularly came
before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on November, 10,
1982; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
• Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in
regard to Tentative Tract No. 12256 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all
applicable interim and proposed general and specific
plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damaoe and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
Faith any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of record, for access throunh or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision.
50
Resolution No. 82 -10
Page 2
•
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on
the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12256, a copy of which i�
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions
and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
A directory shall be placed at the entrance to the
project illustrating the location of specific units.
2. Sidewalks shall be provided to the pool area along
the rear and side of buildings 7 and 8.
3. The rear elevations of buildings 3 and 4 which face
Archibald Avenue shall be upgraded with additional
wood trim around the windows, or plant -ons. Revised
plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of Building •
Permits.
4. The emergency fire lane along the west property line
shall be constructed of compacted granite with turf
overlay.
5. Existing vegetation including trees, and shrubs
along the west property line must be preserved
wherever possible. A master plan of existing
vegetation shall be submitted prior to approval of
the final grading plan as required in Standard
Condition C -2.
6. The detailed landscape plans shall include adequate
provisions for screening adjacent residential units
and the drainage course near the northwest corner of
the property, subject to the review and approval of
the Planning Division.
7. The CCLR's shall include an exhibit showing all fire
access and a provision prohibiting the obstruction
or construction in those areas.
E 61NEERCIG DIVISIDII
8. The developer shall be required to construct the •
Master Plan Storm Drain on Archibald Avenue adjacent
to the proposed Tract from northerly boundary to
existing outlet structure at the SPRR. The cost of
rl
•
c
is
Resolution No. 82 -10
Page 3
the system shall be credited towards the drainage
fee for the project and a reimbursement agreement
per City Ordinance No. 75, will be executed by the
City for the contributions which exceed the amount
of the fee.
9. The applicant shall try to coordinate the storm
drain work with that of the approved projects -
Tentative Tracts 11173 and 11608.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982.
PLANNING C¢1MV5ION OF TFV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of November, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: CO:IMISSIONERS: Rempel, McNiel, Barker, Stout, King
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: CO;IMISSIONERS: None
SA
A.
W
OEPARWrIll Or C+.'.•d!tf cE.QOI.'Da
Si::.Gdp C ?.0(S IOnS
•
C-.11 :t Ili- 'I-' ". f= ejilStOR NA CL:RIIrI 41 III 111E gYtCCII'r6
V/ '••C•S. tr srm br e`.els "I i CE, lice rr o, Ice Ill 011 It s:!C plans nn file
/ I, "" rl an „rp el.,i:na ,,. � IT, � CCNr[io,rs w 11IC -I b.'.rrn.
oils[: 'I, 11.11' I.1 I'll ti, C11.a:1115 iI.Car Illti, all cond i;r me of
ap:r m. a! 9111 t^ omit V`d I. the OW,w lnv Din {;1 on poor to issum:ce CI
Dm Illy %5 p.um [s. 5
1. :r,- .II If I! is 'V, 'It 5.111 .It watil, C01,111.1111, -1h all : ^n, of
C. ! + I It _,I apDl ICable CI[y CNInan¢`t mtelfect at
LI n Cfr a,:IJrII, 1'er ... t IS:.+1_e.
a fl:^ ^e+ ^Ir; ^. 51+11 c'o+r :r 1:1 lot s u:[1 .l lr.lr,l:r 511![1.1 r+1 d+Pa fat
A`v Caii'n Y� +astir ito,al^ r Ps-.vnt to City standards.
y 5. 111:1 , :rptn L` a nail -Id,,1 I`, a 5 foot hill, +:. Cry ,I!I witb
Cb :tctmq ga ns Gr +r'•t :J City 5 erdt. locat,oi Shall bC
n:rl'<e to rn apprnni hr tt.•�r hra ,nv olel vrn.
•-11 of th, r rlF atennl shall Je 1.1 rued [e Me P11m„v9 Dr- 11C.
rr. ,core+ a,1 a•y ,al Pilo, 'o I...-1 of Cu lid i., lermr[5_
�2. III r•• +f y;: ortrmrCrs. inc 1111 :,n1 61 cond i t III-S, strap h 31ch1 t- c!A, I1 II
;rgu t!`-I. sbr ^10 .11 L ^m v a-1 ," ',I nul :erM ("'It allsent ctorrvt,e:
an] str eats ai repni red hY t.......... all 6+i1J, 119 0... v,ns.
v 3. i,J,:r to rs of tl+ 1.1111 tilt Cr bas, s ctiritY Fr n" CC "" • "J
t,.r rrr+ .,It r +n 1, ti,n: ill a :rl 1nntJrnr l ^1 e+n till 1:,! 11A.'ICtCJ to
I11e Stt:t (.1[;111 :1 or tlr hir.[. r of C.„mnnr tJ Crrel n ..... ^
It z -ll ...l; b•cC.or I, and valJ it bnedrry pC 11111 b. ue nIt issve•1
lerst ale PrC1eK . -thin . y,,I r,on the l,t,, I .rol ^ct ap[r•val.
10. As a C-Iitrs,tl 11:r II-It. 11„t prof P;t st Ill Lc o^C 11111 .111`11110 I.
"- , , 1191 •^•rt" 1515 ,LI, Cr anproval, -I ss CDrrmlt5 A,, iSS rCJ er
P t - r o.l rs
�i. AI't 1,111 1'rl ^; rn'I PIa, < a'I to Sr:laittrd tC and al'IIII'n III It' P1111 l'.
Cinsirn rr r -r In rtsm,cr of ^,^+lit as el 1I,, 111,11 ...... lr
sp lL It lrn ue :, :,. Iocl Unn. nmyn[ led n•tbad or 0111ji „l. It, IlgltinO
5,1J 11 a,. r. r.C1Y dffeCC a1)a(f nt pr0-ertir S.
12. dll 5.ir ^,•9 vool)im Wiled at [he tlrre of ins till dc+e lov'•:,,t s1u 11 4,
Solar nr .1t ^d.
�1 ]. le.pul:cl pet ^ttrian [IIh.a /s a rCJS clrCVlalion asslrs shill be prpaidi,J
N :IIgI`l l!C J^relon^C,t to wnnect 6.vlt 1195 with aPld sP11CS and
111- 11anal u.s.
1
i2. All tra :p DICI a :hill tr for r ill nnrb ., 0. 111 r ,Il" <nretJeJ
I5. ib nduJ t•a;m Cnwr 111.1 51,11 le rtM Ig a'1 vr('r p..; D, e City
D IU,.Pr erd du ild Lr9 Offidal Prof to 1:11, 1-1 of I,- I'll, uist
,/ i6. All Fu tlr)inY'a n inn ICI- I'Cwrl u1111 <r +lt n. 1.- 10111 Id a Clmr
idd cmcise 1.111•., Ind od u,q p o1^ _r
vi 1. Still care e,terlel dC ^,t. :ritrl deld tails anJ loos S -ill !e Insulted
on rJCC unit In I!+IS Dr oleo ITV
x//19. Secu ri tY dev is ^S tr:c1+ as vSnga. Incl, seals Cr mst,l!r! oil ..Cn
unit.
Y t9. All unit, wiu „n 11 „1 1-I1Ia; -en1 snail L^ p, CClu n ^d :o ..e a1 trn rar i
/ solar It-f neati,g unit.
-( 20. F.11111 cpCSpru ,rg buildup mr[ ^r iaR t nfa 1.11.1`5 a rl t" t^
o. p'rrnt r': into 011
.r; 1 1rJ,• r C^ J c o:!n-n d eUd n n o ma rq s. Pilo . tir.o mr^ : l lances, r• . 4UVn. r.p,me ,nod
V- 21. 1112 d- I,,0,`'"^^t shall provide an aptlpn to I,c^C b--, t, pvrCl+14< a IOlie
.rata roauAg -it.
�ZZ. Er orOrrCy zs2ondsry o.VSV sail !e pr'o.r[ ^n to this tn¢t [o Che Wil.
faction of the Eoothlli FIT, P,CtCctlon 0+strict_
21. 10[,1 ,10 1151 ^r 1111 -d [r :u +s :r ,., I:i.t 5,,11 I.
hlct ,n a 1 m ^e urn +i tl, III! Ell eItrl+n Lan I'l- A
t^'il plan 1111.11 III nin tut,rt a <t o: SI, ;,I 11 I,,lurch -r,
a r ,111,. :11.l, caq n t a, rg. 'hill
r.1 C ,n cm , "•'• I s
I sot., iCed to mvl a> l OY the CI[Y PlunCrr,
remrw tips or the it ills man.
24, ihiz trict ze,Jll foVm of in,le< to a mlin ll na r,Cf d,t!r iC'. for
// ny,e ttrlan tra,I i.
.]( [5. Strr ^t I'd, Shall M rrrie..J ana d:' 1.111 ly r rrtr , .,c c,u,note
•IN t" Ad", led St"It Idol p.�n(lon of
the Isms mat.
It n,is Berri 11"111[ iml,Cd, to
sprclrl ICts pr c, ah,b,t 111. n.u.rl), 1rr +.1 c ^:'y rf ur r A
tirtt hr t.M ttI to and ren.nd b1 MIT C,:y Dlanrrcr tr,4r to n,, oral of
I wl
Z1. 11 .,1 ..... Sl,all prCVl'e 1 +`r tr "I If
t. _ J• rr It F l^ r.l , +1•nr
r r.fc r.iJncP u, I,, iel f :. n ,ill r r,l,C'^'Fu'!1 tr' n. 5
:PflnrJ ,n lte 1 :.tn : rJ ^• :.rill,! 4•.111
!r` raM Li cv,rrnt rnt,.t rl:^ r �l lr +It a[
ore i�r Mme/ion t, lc tic or Pi nrto,'t. P,1 I,
,vr n. eJ t• [..` C, 'y Clann.r prlar to Hmvae for I lJ ,ttl
ill, l 111q x_ vrmpaar_ i•« ^t_
I. All i` "', Ins IJn,San•r] is la11JS Vtll Fur a P ",E.
.1 .1 S' add slmll cmtald aC In' vIlk aJlu ^nt to rvr :uq stall
!. Pa11,e9 1.1 trCC, soil be , mm mum 15 gall ml Sve.
)-
All tw
y aisle dins Snarl be a a limns of 26 (let r +de
�[9 tha IInJI
�1.
I rnmry ac< s 1 J.
/
4-1111 I rn, pn i _ [ 1 r ry: 11 Ib ^f .< +.'w ann
• Ib
.Ills 11 r zinte ante Fee ant dance, n �. nrr.m
of $I lent ..,:r nt all [belt eunn9 eonstrnct ion In M<arJ,n[n
sbtll !- , d m Ire glee-
subJ eel tD aJprora lUp^ [he raco,r. l Ir..`;L frr Cldnt a�f sn,ll pe
Planning
with tun ll�i ll
In[ Ps"R1 velum...nit
Y pivitmn.
All P,•lfnq tr1[PS shill be d"Dle ft,ip,d.
Z0. A w m oI 'ZO i of the trttl planted yrl to in tee pnry.. t, t,.all be
"I', riven site
Art ANI
.... t.
` /
..i,, Ue Pr m rJlJ w,lA z,,_all........ if.. oDenery
Y IL Sm6il landrPl'n fee lures 5U[A a
$.
rrlig.pt'd
beet, n•anrlenn 41t0
and b
pang X113 re,,i,edr tl
pitsine I`tri ing area; ]fall be turf rlacied.
t
1 ILWg en Ul p „ngnl anJ
onl
intensified sa a g LuLt73!il_DCftl_•
11.1 Ga nnr:, C:!•s anJ qz;n tie 'to,
O. S� n3
g "-
ar rrc /rd nnn.9
fo.r,Iea r lIt, site onI... Cry are Plikei le scar
Ib[ a .,ne. p n e r tr.:u srnr:a 1, nn
1. -
_f A nprgai for Inns dM1,II !^ dnz; in
y 9.
Ib p.uenq be ne Ct
mn`hv945
ln..d ruin /e
I'd......
b v C' p eer„slre Syn o/e roJnre „J snail . rp,.r fivers
rrc ed 1111,5n the r
inine Ill i lr ntemr turn
"n nesi9`ra trr nsi err
ed l yrnq
Ine art
r e lane ing Oiris ion onor to inz [a nail an prt)uc bet i]n ;. •GDrowl
p,
N' e[o t. Cmvrra,as, Cocks. anJ RrsU i[t i.ms
ynd 11 !e fist,
tun
3.
efdl tc, +t an eJ la the Cil Pgnnin
OF is ian to r 9
[0 iSludnce
_ A unllnrm Linn n/o9eem far this is dmgbR ^n le
Prior
Prior $. of pail Jing permi[3.
A,.itl
ab +R;r. 1 rD the
Planning DIVIS13n for [hair r..... A. Is
bnfsraP
arp.3r.111
building theme b. wi3htn 6sawtt or
_-
=1
irrtga
9 dthe
_ 7. The signs Ind lilted on the whit plant ua nn[ ®
Plf Planning Di:e ann tz an plan snail be to dud Approved
by the Planning Otvis ion
aJ vIU this r
aDNOVaI and ulll repuire 50111t, Sign ter ieu and alrl'rJ'.a 1.
s
prior to the Issuance of pus ldin9 prune es.
building
I.
$.
[r siting
Mrh tin_I ApPrnra is Rn2rIrH
ties andfl be retained imerevrr passe pie. mtyper plan If
nailing
[ryes their piles ye iota bon, s and .ID'• Ira❑ he
n
— 1. Pere lap ^<nl Review fMll be a<car:pllintJ
, elinq
by tt, evelpl'b, Said •b an shalt 4x4 +t into arc Inn[ lM VrdryrseJ
prior it th. iann,[r
Paris of • Oulle lug
ei.,wi lobe trvrs are In !e ....... td, tribune, ...hods. and nn
I"•�nlveb`d
Ire Yril be Dl anted fur rovedtbnnnt of rrmpvad tries. Ine IO en i; requiree
'an I
— 2. Develpprler't Revlon ]Fall be aeempii
be
Co De tImbiltel M ,nd dnr rovCd DY fire Planning Division prier'te approval
lFed prior In recn rvintrw al [nt Ilnai
fuWirls ian yp,
I' tie fiml gran mq plan.
S4ert Inv[, d mbi i,nm ill 15 941130 site or lar. De
9or,
.JL •. Approval 11rnUtive tn.t Ih.jy�54 9rrntr�l pie
maalloJ in
aaanOnq with teerN 3M. flan of sire![ trees for ❑rr Cl ty of Pent La
JO City
I -.[ h In.
° +?_ CH'�1,W j,-Z- p���_[17y Ll!IJrJG IL_r-z1�,
f.'ar.,,g, am shall hn Planted at an average of every 30' on interior
d. This
Slretls and $D' on l,te /for zt /[Ctt.
_ Contli ei Purl 010 Cermet is gran tea rn.
MI[n Ihrc the Planning Cane ilS ipn mJY add ail delete <p�d��ro- rrsvor .e+o11
the Conditional ale Derail.
1.
A mintese- of SP errs, per 9 /esz a e corgn¢d ill the following sizes "
be
shall tinkered within [M lavelppmenL 20:44" W. or larger, Ns
— S. 7 developer I4 reguir[d l3 obtain the telluw ill
Stilton, and 101 -5 gallon.
si9nmq sle V +rn[ Ay
purchaser, of Mmes union have A
- / 6.
all
p...... or pool rt el. ^:Ir wn [rail an or
1dp[mt to their trope. ty.
Y
areal shall be ma Ante deed Ina Malloy AM thriving Con-
free
ertien, Lie
/
on. f
/eon Yeedl, train, and debris.
In Mr[helln9 the name lo[aled on lot Led
an
1/ 6.
All slob Ddnsy An v test el Itre (51 feet in vrr [lull hn igbt aril of 5:1
— I Lave raid tn. CC. l I. y end
.
untiv)[and'ttat said lot—
Or
91a43ee slope 'I'll) e+ Ia nels:aP ^J a,,J Irrl9a t ^] m ac[ardnnCe whin Sto
is tnNect to a
gasmen[ fur [ne Purta se of�foiti et
to a tu,l r ci trout
•
D tang rein rr +m es of Abe Oty ill R.m[M (ucaa”, I. Sues ]lure planning
]hail {nL l.rde
eflet
teal llc
gat. iii to
!u[ nal M bmgeJ Ic eo ", 9rpong tiller an.l al`s "epnate
Y•uta mi tr^ec. an f.U, Planlea9 a,d Irrzgztion shall pe Cunt loot oily
Signed
^rm ea mad in A M.i It', am [near in9 nnr it l on by lnr rle.r leer rrnnl ._1,n
i'urct �yei
rdin,hml unit Is sole and d,.plcd by the toter. Prior to het ilia ng
pC[u ten Cy for !r]f! nr[S. an In)teclian Of lee Clop es 41,11 by I.%IleleE
Said statement Is l0 be filed by use Bevel
by the Planning Staff to netermire that It Is In Iatsaraemey roues inn.
oprr YIID !M1C (It
otmC,nL r, r prior b
�7.-
All ryrl.eys. olen nos, and i'lin" aping snarl he fatly ,lentai,ied pr a
`/
1' b. .nnr tp a... plat and rein /datien
r; -no -. rrs a:ynU el ian or pterr n..ans 1¢e
111-p table ble ro air City. sn.L p.ror
or rr rind) . in I,; nrr.r nr
L91I d,nd Prrn lt, 1 m n' rI,
w @il in srR.l iv it inn
of inentrimi shall be ].Milled to the illy into, to iSSNlhce of Anlld mg
rip is al�` .r II hn lM1l. r.......
film ale elf c led "w'.1 0ilv,cts,
rn.nt la.
shell !e oM1 -�i u. r
Call +r I n l 1'rl. rr l.rnl or
high it.i lei
tyaDnl.l
R.
the .rent d landlIaPin and an
Ye. g. anpreprith
en: ,..ill [141 ,t ^nub to it li
Fn rtJrt in till Il_il,f rr-. e
leterr ei (prure"I'le 9 at.ann It q^ne /a rrJ l.y r i o. n f•¢L es,cn
4beittelen anstrm, Ivan De
till tailed by tn[ developer In acct /eanp ullh wMri tl[d plans,
Y ( l .,u nnr .ern ns. +n nr @r SLbvI nlhnrrt .'thm
sill 40 d, ys Dn3r to lee final
Oivii ion nap oe I......0 o/ mlc lrpr.,.l m u-r cue If N^ l.b.
terms" the Cate of all ether re)bk ,t sal
D.DjeCli. '
2
Y g, :: 1.1:. • +1 .,r! r Fri r, [1 IIr- IinJl vrl'. r 1•r I1.,. e•
t I ^,nR " Tip r nlvr 1, tl lea 'rots [ia i
- all• • ,. olio r Y, ra [. [ ":t rl.,v and rJty [.I[rlr[I r.rr Ir `.,, 'lie
,yr 1'..1.1 Sett letter :1 L.r n I,
• Ir. +,1 :r:Ih: rti lr ,) dirt l.r 1 if r
"I
1 11. n,l nr II
f\ n t :e c or rJ 11 ,:t , r•
•^ I. Ir'•lt It.n II 1 o..r :,, l,^ Onl (I,,. nFle
r: .[ry rl ::r ': r•i rJ r[: r\ al lu.
+frh��l ir. .In ::rM1 r Tic hrl� •call d the UI'..•.i;b.r
Jrm:ary Lrf [Y. r "g YrrcP rli ve nlOnn un:, hall
In •, ,1 t.,ll p,.[ loll and v,rJ r , q: I! n
.
[n• tat nr o,l..Ilr t
ala[It, 1 r'I [n nn^:r n lrR t
In
t : : -F LY Urc pl,Ll Vrl to•gntiu
9. this t..h LVOStnn .. it rot[ "r e4
far t" arc il" it
ne•r.�..rtn " e arm[ rz[rng nla[r +e en [G J,•s iyn arc lion or
r .••,,1 D'd v.Is.n .P, In Fina at Yr0V31 and r ^cn..tg,rn or
[he nnp If Ue v!JUrs tan n ;,.P, to be del'I.Pe'I lr n[t nr.nn ,
Rol l[aI trealL Ci : :aCf InF 8_pl_I'. n1 :I Si 011 FOR COIflLIAJICE x1111 111E rMIOYIIt4
U!.NTIj,S: -
�1. Ili :. i redo[ s'.:I1 c[ -P 1, latest adopted Un iforn Guile ing Cnnr,
U, roar'' I........ -1 PJC. IfniI non Plnab tn9 Coee, elalional FI C[ili[ C,,, ,nJ
all RY.r at :l rc !Ie [c -u and Vre"rem, in el /n:{ J[ IN elite O/ ISe. .d
if rela, Crr -rt t. -I
][ 2.
I'll, to i .... I. -e of b,ildinq I'll its for ic.b.stlble ronst,octint, ev 6lrnce
(� S +IJ[ Le 1, t :..l [n tJ,•. raotnln o,,t1'itt Tire chief In,t b.rr :o mall :,J [[r
, In Iy I:r lira e:,a i3 .....ante, p.•rn ing om,ple tl On OI retry aeU
I,,, Irr Vtectrrn l,"r.t.
.Y 1. P"im U flu inrr nee nr A bu JJrng permit (nr I n ... droll, durll
Fall) o eaior at..UJ. to an r. alloy tat. ure vPli[.rnt shall Frog
In, yea at the es [Jl ntba,f "Co. '..l fee, may mcluae, Ln[ m[
Le b.cr [mil to: Olv 6e :If ...uun lee. pa.+ ire, oroim9e rec, SYS loons
[e.0i :f-rn[ red, Prr m'rand phn Clretkinrl fees, and 5f MO1 Fee'.
�- a. Pro' " the s
i ne onr
e o/ I Cnil"Irg permA in' a neu c[rtlal or ivins tr sal
e'etri ant or'aliO.n to an "sling U.vz`ncerrnq the apPI small alull ply
Ce•r la; +: -Tit fees t tn• suhiPP.eJ s[e. "I. fees r y .c l n,le, prat not
to Bossed ta; Systems Eerl)cl m�t fee, Ortrnage lee, Permit"
ermit am R
fnn 3ur3 lee v. 1
\L�>. Slu rs ]'IJ.e... I. oil be preVrJed by the pJ ll Jrng Olf it it 1.
)( 6. p.[nrnq ur,r t3 :n,n to tons truc[ea -fill lire .elm raanl m,lerill and
cc . rsbFle cool wise rid 1, ro n'
T. A)' [Or'.rr U - ^Il iniS S1,1 bare the tW lldis, ejevat,.o Y"I'll ll:c ''Fret
u" / -l" haielpl ro a:frli i [Rsean. ' .00e term aouW .1dJ..t
Jo] hood Sidb:q Jr plant. p
•. Init ing a.urlcva
N". he cr,:;rl idled . k h [li''"Iran mudding Cade for y.nprr [Y hne cleuantut
t'Inardel ing Vte. ",I IrQ Ii re - /e,I,llv<IM tf Of ..ist, I,ullrling :.
_ 7. f•Ill log A'ri l.f inl([I
Won't Lr rl[molitlrr[.
1/3- E.i,t inq srngr di ;ppWl 4cilit irs ihlll Le "e"nel. frllnd ]•moor III -led
P. cu =Plv ,rill IM Ilnpo•m Plo'piny Cede, and 0nifeh s 0olidin9 Code.
P. It No. is
11. t',raJ /log
�/ L !.n•l inq of tn. Svbl ^rt 1'nr0 ^rtY l::Il t^ in "r. "Inc, .n [h Ile Ihifann
Cri rl url ludo, (IIY rn•Ilmj •tac.l rr It Wool J[[rp t•J q:d bnq yr.r[I rt et, Ile
lur.rl g- aJrn•1 Plan ;Ld 11 Le in svp a[an[HI in yrvrve ulln lee dpi +OVeJ
A. rploal Is Jin9 plan.
sollos report 5 :1J 11 t•e pre0,rM Ly -"q 'uhflyd engineer leented by the
Stale I GM1rurri is [g Prrfm.I a 1h hrk.
J. A Jr- l"'CJI a rSpolt shall be prepared Lr a nv.il :1i d eryLrerr Or grJlo9111
a e vuw ue at the [ir:e or art•I rcu 1. on rar grating III in ?.ec t.
L. ILe tin it gone irrg plan Stu 11 L^ sub l•'[[ to r v fml tl V•OWI pY lne
Crra•Ihr9 Con ritlre vrd stall Le «r'd et•d nnpriw wNUion of (1'f Ilml
t u[M IYIS Inn nr,p or ISSVJn Ce Of Lu''ding Iremist nliicl ..... .....
S. As a cos ton - lot sold i v ill on, ill to l l o.ing rel. irecm 1, sod 11 Le r!t:
I,
S.rcty ll i _ill be paSteJ and an agfr•n rot e.ral Rnl, giJ lJn toe slog tam facilities Is line ... fshction of ill Bn11U1nil no Safety or J'.n te.Ing III pa
! DIV. Si on.
p. Appr"prmte easnnen td. Ill safe aiaro Sdt or nra.n i.n r,S tar tot ...
`oroh-c ea ..to or mer an idcent pl :[a 1, are to er r1,1 In ur1 Ina
Cir Jed Lo the "t"I"ction of in' Om id ing and ;alntr 01,1, idn,
e. Ou -311, drat",, Irrrprovrnen<i, tee ... ary for d,,,,tering or protecting
tln• sobdivilled prgmrt let, are m be ul tlal led Ile.' to fa...... or
D,l Orn[nntll LVttS to,o dldin,q^ F upon oily GJ•[^ tiro[ rar be S.bject
parcel relative to which a boildin oe. gnlering, Ind. III, or i,h.h ]
9 panel{ i, ri9vr sled.
d. rind grading pL.3 for ..,h pa rte' are [n be min it c'u In urn G. naing
all ally a oNI.n for apnroYal Prior to i - of building pemlts.
(Il ii my be on an incrrnienWl Jr conpaSite Sbatil.,)
e. All slope pants in o"I" or fsvc (5) feet
5:1 or 9.m[er close ,all t'e eenea .'lp n vertlUl nOin Tit and r
eI gradin9 or seie otner native ggtSrt .ran C,,;., IM
alt ^rnativ" erlluJ of n'osim [ rat stilt
be Co : :Plelce to the sa li'faction of [be C"ld"'I ;lIf Icill. Lri9
Shall To P,.vw,d to gervinale the 'I'd and rrrllntdin grl,th to d ppldrtlon t
6 conths after gerruwtfon.
APPLICnbi StWtl COIItL(i illf [11L II_fF BI114 01_l il0_I FDP CNIPLIA: CE 'Will' THE FiALMI, •
CurlINTI011s. Cedr ca tin and Vehim,tar :rcrtl
["Flatt.m non To mane nr Iirrnl n.P nl an on er for ureet rlgnet-
olnxY and Ill ne[..... y easnron is at donor. e+ llrr lent.. live mnY,
I. IMrllcaarbn Shall be made of the Ibllo. 9 rign[s.of-.ay Jn lne fol louing
Str'et3:
Idditloml Feet a
-Ads I anal feel on _
Hd f tI on, I fee t In.
-- --
). Corner proper,/ Ifne ''Alas -ill be reau •J per C, nit- -
e. All nght3 of vehicular ingress to and egress Irm tn.111 be d,,.m. eJ
at tot I..,: -- —_
Yec.,I ocil moil" 11 ",ll he 1'r.vih,ef ens.r'Iriq "C", 1. all pa."ls
peer pr.edjl rwrts, Jrrvrs, or lurking acrd s, aorl stall be nallead do
the Pap pr sMll be r... did corwrenl Pith the nap,
+1 IY...V. r r ..JY .I In I,•
.rr the n p I.rr CIIY Ingrn "S
- -- r:.: Sri P +(n .. .. .. ... ..... -. ...: .
ill•rr .
In role ul In
[ %l.iu i%fmrn
Ly..., un 1.r
InC Silly S 51+111 bn Ir.S l.tll[a
[M1, a[IZ faCti n:l of [be <IlY h.5 r.
R letter egrn..er. at U.r ¢.:l Stun
-�9. r .... J\ lm <
" h: lrc o ., To 11 I L�
•n. re tr..r.. J+cA t[J to lM Eit)
of a1O`V[Jrce o! Str rr lv.
Jra+nJ 9^ turn I 1`0r Ine Un..nS
o.�Ieri 51y 11
rl \S rrYn,yr t'%Y.. h D %irate pryi any.
Le reyyr ryJ, beJ.n p+0ir•f t)
d.
J. Sb. n -1 �r r� _nn
p- Vrl aryl !loon Col:bol
1. anlru<1 I:.11 itn'¢t i -y. o.0 xntz inclutlm 9, but not l+mrltd to
Curb nnJ gu[[r r- R.C.
-_ " II', dppl gant rill be ......o"blt fo
a, i,:Jg¢ la<luurs r Conforum. of an
.
Hvr "'n t. Si Jru J1 Y, tole Jp"go"[S, wrArrJy
tree' led ib ee[ I19hb ,n all interior
ohs qe
rf+lu ifrd by (nr [i(Y fog ......
t c,;.
_ 2. Inte%SoCtlon ar,ins Nll be
}' a ` ^:+ • of 26 u vita pn[ -ent .ilh in a 40 foot
re0uireJ it the l0110.in9 I.... lon5:
vile aedic"'d
Stall br inn"'Iclyd for oil Nif-
�[ 1 lY -st•ua the f,llt.+rn9 vns un 9 Improremb+is Inc!vJ ing, but not
I rmilV
], TLe NoDOUnI Dhojttt ills nithin a %eJS Ind ie Rea n
flooding lltld
ly:
tuv • to
der the ,Iation.Il flood In SUrame fit
fi +•( (-
amt tut leet Ip
the p%ovazioni or !hot prowl JM CI tY Drdino,,, rlo,
f.- SIP: —'P /.1 r! IFRT (: -' - -
i1"n p Jh i..Il sit 1•"•L NIT, ILfI1,
}a.
e. R Jha ina9< cM1lnnei
IIr�Ji1 ry:E11LRY liL iu'Ip olllf l!
:.GA[CgR� ✓ ✓ T - --
and /or fl cad Or lee ton pull .ill lea rr9nir¢0 to
protect Lt[[ IIM SIfYC(V res b dirtrtln S1:¢et ru
y 9 l!
-- --
��+� T
4
!torn drain, nn to street', or td a
!f.T{IE VIZ\ --
..a[. a' A4'Orra l¢ P''OV I31ans sna 11 b¢ aJe for a«rnlanre 'I'd dl ,,,,al
at' fie
athlete dralnoge
enty ing Ind or
from aJln<[nl a
letter
IS,
of acceptance froa ofic- '{ream pruV('rty O.rrr3 Snail be repel
vl:e It rvno lr iron NC tract IIOVS
—
red
onto private Drnprrt ir',
s Innds<J ping and I'lillion on .:.tar.
iTree is r,. lri _.. Lgl1 be do, 191ed as ma,,,
va tar < 9
tree drive g ro "a tlnn of 5prC5al curb ne.I,,', c<[a.rc,i
L
larywn' being rc,,I. •J in the Dnnuc right- of -.iy
a 113, a,U% rpbndSGDed earth 34erns if
1 uJ 511r1 Xd
')all n� n, h^J Ur eru Ices
i bee Iran he
Gif Lng inttis Office.
h+l. lndnroll 3 prolrerty
-
a .d.h tine [o any 0th it, it
Y pinch plrnib re9 fired.
�5.
_aC. p• the roll drain SNII be inv
Sbrrt ivpru.I -rot 001-5 oppru:rd by the Cap Engineer
/ 0
Ein9,.,: tailed to the
the City [nL il'ler: SJ till-cm. of
!/ a P "lilt"14 Civil En and wept red
- 9'wer 1of i be re9YVr.1. for all sheet
prior In r - pr an nII wrni t. rr -.I
ol3,n and p.a l+lr5 ua RSS GOV tl•c location of -a Ile Istirg utility
IJCih UCS
N _
'- -
.rtmn the right- al -.JY.
/
n. Su•etY
_�'--
-�___
Prior
,}� ,.,IT ne post.•, and an
pl In! City E-,Irl •Rttwr.•eeuted to the va Ili fa<[l,n
-A.A. Id recdrJa [l on dl the c.Ip. a �r
dotlecl
study for
r Jrl due Gtr
Of III To" 'C r •rp.[. Y Y• gnats -U!'�9 <a:,Je bon
ens,
tn< snail n¢ SYLlmtlfOW ( Irl`yd'.1 -1 is and JrJiii.,
rel e.. Gtr Engineer
pour to r ormn9 Of too p or IM1e
n ,,co of to rlu In
/ 9 permres, .,JC......
for
L.
[nvez lint
]. R11
Ulllllilt
Sbirl i -0•ov n -cots mall ne inf GlleJ to Ine salisfom.'. of Ine
City Enlinrrr,
�I. Provide all
prlor to oc<ue5nry,
0. Poi —ot stnwn9. naming- trdfl,,
utility swxice3 to both lo[ Inc 1-1m9 sanitar
/ . ter, electric paper, 9.1. lr1[prmnp and <o nl.• l,levsirmyconduit:
aM .beet -J *e IT going shall be
n:[a 10e1 per Ine r 9: +r aenit
r
-
Y (- All ublllir3 ullhm
of Ine City fn9in¢ar,
[be Troll, sledt le in:Wlh'd m:ur:UrunnJ
Lalut'll utillbel
1. f.r;t ing tit, I.,d r
aeon g dolor arlrr'Ia IS Ir iv tl:Jn I} +T.
trill, IT all [In'r5 +I lh a,,.- to5JlVC[len ur 11 rfmJln OVfn ipe
[d uli dyrrn9 cdn5
�[ '- ;f 1111Y unit':[ -[5 SNiI D! wort Jrd
C, iii ar tru <l ton. /1
pout 31111 be .qv and to Cover the Cott o! ]r)J ing
tnr to.'<ili CJ li ore Of The
rr hg utility C -N-111 1,d the C.I. Enwnrrr,
t "d
."<h L.dl L¢ helm d,d on torpTell.. of the construction to
the ubebCtlon of
y
Y '- E¢re loprr
the CITY loll nee r.
'bell be respdn3inl
tit ibes, a for thr reloo(ion
11 required. o! eaiil ln9 nnpl l<
0rrtiowr shall b! reipor,ble !or the in 3lalinllon 01 'beet 119h11
In ateordancb •Ith Sdolhero Colif.rohi
•
IJ13on Collin, "od
� � IarlJJftla. a
¢,ter and lr¢r Na,s shall be delia"d end m.Itrnaed Im rest
•
rc iu iri a•n Il n1 the Lac r enga County Valrr aislricl I[r':n). Inr,hill
Ina m.F c[ and ".a -en[al Ilnalu. n,: ,r [, rnl of m2 rpvnn
gal
•
at San Dn..1 inn. A letter mlylla,. from (6:D vrll be rbl,r it eo
rr,pr [e rra•. al ion.
p. r. Is 1.111 .al' n veu rhf Ico-
all nUlit kt and nn,r+ r n1 114
n .1 or „ of the f,nal ad I suOJcct la any
[', ` C
.r.
,:,rr vu[1 —1 na re nra Iran Wm.
M- Lrnen,l
rtr.iurn .. nee and :.:I —It
1.
reruns Lan oln.r dgcrm irs Vill be regolrad as I1ltans:
A. fall -i.s far:
, - :nl (.c iTi }rl pr ioi- Ln- : :ivance nl a
'
..I r rob
n Sa
_- (. Lr, fiv nairw Covnty flood Control District
t.
A Copy of Ina (d'reoelts, Condillons Ind AesV lct ions (C.(. A A.',)
ana ."ti[l e1 Of Incurpnr a: ion 0f the HO eo.nen Assoc i a[ion, iui,jacI
to tine al ^rowl of the (ity A4lormry, shall be recorded ,ritn 1hµ nap
and a wpy rror,0,1 to the C,ty.
htl octet and tract maps shall ...rani t. City standards and
a.
A pa¢el nap stall be ., ded prior [o rirat phase subablsmn to
�g.
present creation of unr•cpgn iEed Da reel s.
Prior to mconb than, a Dplice or Intention 10 roan aad]er join
I rd1darn and lil�tlng District[ shall be filed vith lase City Council.
b b
m n,cenn9 cost, Invo m
lved Ia District lama[I0n slmll he toe
by tl. an'N oyar.
�6.
All perir +.[ac IanarcapN Wrkvays are r.q.1r.4 t1 6e am,eaed Intn the
landscape wlntrnance district.
V ].
U.4scaring and Irrigation systels reAyared 11 be Installed an p:hl is
rf9nt- of -..ay m inn rrrirc [ce or @is I ... I arm .ha 11 b.• Cann mmasly
ininu fined by the dlv,loper until ane,,,ad by the City and annw"
to the landscape maintenance district.
5
0'
•
• •
• RESOLUTION NO. 82 -105
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 82 -03 REQUESTING
A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1 TO R -3 FOR 2.02 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH
OF MONTE VISTA STREET
WHEREAS, on the 30th day of July, 1982, an application was filed and
accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of November, 1982, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following ini` dings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area; and
. 2. That the proposed zone change would not have
significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with
the existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 10, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 10th day of November,
1982, Zone Change No. 82 -03.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 82-
03.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
• shall be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982.
.Sf
Resolution No. 82 -10
Page 2
r
PLANNITIG C9MMISSION
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted-by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of November, 1982, by the following Vote -to -wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Barker, Stout, McNiel, Rempel, King
None
None
59
•
•
• Motion: Moved by Hempel, seconded by Mc Niel, carried, to adopt Resolution No.
82 -104, approving the master plan for the 160 acres between Archibald,
Hellman, 6th Street and 4th Street.
Commissioner Stout voted no because of his concerns relative to traffic.
Y • i # f
9:07 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
9:15 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
•
IF ♦ a i
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -03 - BIDCAL - A change of zone
from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to R -3 (Multiple Family Residential)
for 2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north
of Monte Vista Street - APN 202 - 131 -61 and 62.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12256 - BIDCAL - The
development of 25 condominium units on 2.10 acres of land in the R -1 zone
(R -3 pending) located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Monte Vista Street - APN 202- 131 -27, 61 6 62.
Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report.
• Chairman King opened the public hearing.
Mr. Gene Karin, 20814 Roadside Drive, Agoura, representing the applicant,
stated that all conditions are acceptable.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman King stated that some time ago the Planning Commission had more or
less decided that tot lots should be included in developments such as this and
asked if a tot lot has been provided for this project.
Mr. Vairin replied that it has been and is shown on Exhibit IUDs,
Commissioner Stout stated that there are no sidewalks from the pool in the tot
lot area and wondered if a meandering sidewalk should be put in in that area.
Mr. Johnston, Assistant Planner, replied that conditions 7 and 8 require
sidewalks.
Mr. Hopson stated that the CC&R's should set out that there will be no
permanent structures on the turf block so that at some future time emergency
access will not be obstructed.
• Planning Commission Minutes -17- November 10, 1982
�O
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt •
Resolution No. 82 -05 approving zone change 82 -03 and recommending such to the
City Council.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -106 approving Tentative Tract 12256 with the added conditicn
that the turf block access remain unobstructed and that this be shown in the
CCGR -s.
r ■ • a
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CUNDI'PIUNAL ust rtnmli Nu. oe -cc - �nnnne -
The development of a 3,691 square foot elementary school on 3/4 acres in
the R -1 zone, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208 - 241 -09•
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman King asked where the temporary trailers are and whether they would be
used during construction or to house new students in order to have new
construction.
Ms. Coleman replied that the students in the existing school would not be
affected in that the shift of playground area would be the only change.
Chairman King asked what happens to the playground when he puts up the
temporary facilities, he constructs the facility, where then is the •
playground.
Mr. Coleman explained the required minimum of playground space for preschool
children as mandated by the State code indicating that there is more than
double the space he needs for outside recreation.
Chairman King asked why the applicant can't construct the permanent facility
before putting in the trailer.
Chairman King opened the public hearing.
Mr. Sharma, 7775 Sunstone, the applicant, replied that he needs the trailer
for the time being as he does not have space and is not in a financial
position to begin building right now. He indicated he must refuse children
every day.
Commissioner Me Niel asked, aside from what is laid down in the text regarding
conditions, what his plan is.
It,. Sharma replied it is to build a new school in Rancho Cucamonga.
Commissioner Mc Niel
asked now
far into the future this would be.
•
Planning Co .mission
Minutes
-18- November 10, 1982
�I
• ORDINANCE NO. * / 91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
202 - 131 -61 & 62, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, NORT ". OF MONTE VISTA STREET FROM R -1 TO R -3
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
followirg:
A. Tha: the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
• Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly.
2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald
Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street, from R -1 (Single
Family Residential) to R -3 (Multi - Family Residential).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
l2
0
J
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 15, 91982
1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginee
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Ordering Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 for Tract No. 12040
Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the
work in connection with Annexation 811 to Landscape Maintenance
District No.- 1 for Tract 12040, located at the northeast corner
of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue. - - --
The Anden Group, developer of Tract No. 12040, has been notified
of the public hearing by mail. Posting at the site has also been
completed. The attached resolution also approves the Engineering
Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 82 -193 on
November 17, 1982.
It is reconmended that City Council approve the attached
resolution ordering the subject annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report.
Res,vettully su milted,
LBH: :Jsa /
Attachments
4S
ATE@9 C
G: rcm:�p p'- <,,,:,c
October 25, 1982
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 -C Ba;:eline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
ATTENTION: Joe Stofa
SUBJECT: Tract #12040
Dear Mr. Stofa:
We, as the Developer of Tract #12040, agree to join the
city -wide Landscaping and Street Lighting District. We
understand credit on the landscaping /maintenance portion
will be given on a city -wide basis, based on an estimate
• submitted by the City Engineer.
Very truly yours,
TI ^IDEN GRO
Jos h 7. Oleson
Dir ctor of Forward Planning
•
The AnAen Group 629 Covina Boulevard /Ban Dimas, California 91773, Telephone 714 5996864
N r�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
• COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) as
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
NOTICE OF POSTING
I, Lloyd B. Hubbs, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is
the duly appointed, qualified Superintendent of Streets for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that pursuant to Resolution No. 82-
193 of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of
California, he on the 3rd day of December 1982, posted the
"Notice of Improvement" of the City Council's intent of
• consideration of Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 which notice is attached hereto and made a part
hereof; that Notices were posted not more than three hundred
(300) feet apart in a consipicuous place along each parcel of
property affected by Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1.
9 DATE:
Su erintendent oP Streets
of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga
0
C �
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
ANNEXATION NO. 11
to the
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Tract No. 12040
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to
be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 12040 as well as
• on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to
be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway
right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the
developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract
12040. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance
with the Planning Commission.
Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment
diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and
specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same
extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All
improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data,
contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that
maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (E.30) per square
foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be
based on actual cost data.
1(
Engineer's Report Annexation 11
Page 2
The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(including Annexation No. 11 comprised of -0- square feet of landscaped area)
is shown below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost
$.30 X 261,346 square feet = $78,403.80
Per Lot Annual Assessment
78 403.80 = 43.08
18t a
Per Lot 'lonthly Assessment
$43,08 = 3.59
12
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the
attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation
involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated
for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active
homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved
•
by the District due to said homeowner maintenance.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and
labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated
within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for Annexation No. 11 is found to be of general benefit to all
lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel.
The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1983, to determine
the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during
the 1962/83 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as
required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
1, City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's
Report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets
•
public hearing date.
(,-1
�J
\J
•
C
Engineer's Report Annexation 11
Page 3
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. II
Vn
CI "1'1' OI' R > \ \C110 Ca:CA \IO \Cir\
` G
ENGINEERING I)IVISION
VICINITY WI'
191]"
(/A�
A N
kRAgc',T
G.A/O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�awr•. Jon D. Jlikela
J. aer II James C.
Rich M.
Richard M. Dahl Phillip D. . Schlosser
December 3, 1982
The Anden Group
629 Covina Boulevard
San Dimas, California 92773
Attn: Joseph M. Oleson
RE: Ordering Annexation #11 to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1 for Tract 12040
Gentlemen:
On December 15, 1982, the City Council will be holding a public
hearing to discuss the annexation of your development, Tract
12040 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The meeting will
• be held in the Forum at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161
Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga.
Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call this
o f Lice.
Cordially,
CONAN", ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
BARBARA KRALL
Engineering Technician
BK:jaa
9320 RASELI!IE ROAD, SUITE POST OFFICE BOX 807 RAANE:IID CCCA1h `c
J
P 249 237 566
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVICEO-
The Anden - Grou -
p _
'd-EAI ANO NU - -
629 Covina Blvd.
fan U1mas, LA 9Z//7
NSTAGE
11.55
I CERt' E9f[EE
W
.f a.
E It" c1[n 1111, •
N
Ili
na
I'
R nr
\L„ SItLfAN F[
1.55
. RESOLUTION NO. • � "t — eb
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION
NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENA14CE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT
NO. 12040
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
17th day of November, 1982, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 82 -193 to
order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 11 to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 82 -193
was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by
law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on
file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said
Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally
posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as
appears from the affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of
the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the
Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property
. proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 82 -193, according to the names and addresses of such owners as
the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and
manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in
the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucanonga that the public interest and convenience requires the
annexation to the district and the ordering of the work, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 82 -193, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer is hereby finally approved; and
SE,:TION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of
assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved.
SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not
is begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982.
71
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Ll
DATE: December 15, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Red Hill Country Club Drive Slope Stabilization
c�-yoti
o�
2cY � 'n
Z
C
197 I
At your October 20, 1982 meeting, the subject issue was discussed without
representation from the Country Club. Further discussion with Mr. Crum has
resulted in a request to review the issue directly with the Council.
Attached is the original staff report on the item and Mr. Crum will be at the
meeting to discuss the Country Club's position.
Respectfully
�/
OL as
Attachment
I )—
•
•
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA(.ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 20, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATIN
C�cA,ugy
Attached for Council review is a request from Red Hill Country Club
Proposing the construction of a retaining wall on Red Hil Country Club
Drive at the first curve northerly of Foothill Boulevard. This wall
would perform the function of preventing sloughing of the bank onto the
roadway and stabilization of a green area on the country club golf
course.
In recognition of the mutual benefits of such a project and the Country
Club offer to fund 50% it would seem appropriate for the City to
participate in the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council direct staff to proceed with
development of a cooperative project with the Red Hill Country Club to
construct the required retaining wall adjacent to fled Hill Country Club
Drive for an amount not to exceed $20,000. Final project agreements
subject to Council approval. Funding for the project to be drawn from
Systems Development Funds.
Resnectfully subm,,tted,
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
Attachments
LBH:bc
93
1977
r c
September 17, 1982
C
i
Mr. Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
'en 9320 Baseline Rd.
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
it Subject: Red Hill Country Club Drive
�± Dear Lloyd:
II Red Hill Country Club is continuing its efforts to increase
the stability of the bluff between the first green and Red Hill
�I Country Club Drive. We are now replacing the existing clogged drain
line with new drain pipe. When completed next week, it should be
Ij able to remove all free standing water primarily from rain runoff
that accumulates above the bluff easterly of the first green. This
should significantly reduce water seepage through the bluff face re-
sulting in concurrent reduction of bluff erosion.
i While this action will alleviate the bluff erosion problem,
we still desire a more permanent solution if one can be found for
a reasonable cost, that, in addition to protecting the roadway
would also protect the existing first green and golf course bound-
aries. I'm sure you can appreciate that Red Hill Country Club has
only a limited budget that can be allocated to this project.
Following our earlier discussion about retaining walls, parti-
cularly a cement block wall to hold the toe of the slope and your
expression that the city might share in the cost, I met with Ernie
Reed of Retaining Walls, Inc. to explore the feasibility and cost
of retaining the bluff with a criblock interlocking concrete crib -
wall. Subsequently Retaining Walls, Inc. submitted a proposal to
i� engineer and construct approximately 1,444 square feet of wall face
area (about 150' base stepping in to a height of about 16' above the
,I road surface), for $18,050 (copy attached). This would be adequate
to retain the critical erosion area and would be added to in the fu-
ture if it ever became necessary. Construction of the criblock wall
which would take about one week would not damage the root zone of the
trees atop the bluff which are essential as a backdrop screen for the
first green.
We find this proposal to be attractive and believe it would
solve our mutual erosion problem. Therefore, the Red Hill Country
Club board of directors has expressed its willingness to share crib-
lock,, retaining wall costs equally with the city up to a maximum Red
Hill share of 510,000. Please advise whether or not the city of
Rancho Cucamonga will proceed with the project on this basis.
Yours truly,
is Georg. A. Crum
CJ1 a
A Project Chairman
�G 7 "1
ttach _
P .. . r r 7 l.a
CRIBLOCK
RK_AINING WALLS,
Northern California San Diego Area E7 Los Angeles Area
PO BOx1036 ❑ PO. BOx 2129 `L"I P.O Box 621
Ormda. CA 94563 Escondido CA 92025 Pasadena CA 91102
(415) 254 -0446 (714) 489.1108 (213) 792 -5828 •
i0 ?e,d Hill Country Club PROPOSAL
E T
r,
STREET OWNER
OrY ?ancho C'u CamorlsLPl, ETA 917 10 GENERAL CONTRACTOR
ATTN i1oorCe Urtirr SUBCONTRACTOR
Ro f� vin i' 1lcnl E'nl in. r, a, .h, ". t� Tri7, �...,;,n. CT. •(� . »; r.T
,r,t'o^ rar ran fr rT, Richard "ills AcgcOiltes nnc; dated 312611P"21-
Retaining We'Is. Inc. will erect CRIBLOCN crib bin retaining walls as required lot the above protect, its follows
per alot'e plan, there is 3pinrox rrotel3' 1,'144 g 11:Se feat of fnee area. At n ciTsit of
512.x,0 per iouzilre fOOt the hall Cost %trould le anpTOY.iI''ately SS8,C5'?. r,).
Invoicing:
1. ,era ni rg wont will be invoiced 'As Built" measured on face of wall from the bottom of the base
l ^� per ft. single depth well
I" sq ter' per sq ft double depth wall or --_______ Per so f1. (composite)
1' . r) per sq It triple depth wall
2. fro lee price shall be "Lump Sum" In the amount of S based on the design and dimensions as submitted:
Changes.
Any alteration or demaflan from the above spenfimtlons Involving extra cost of material or labor will be executed only upon written orders for
same and will become on extra charge over the sum mentioned m this proposal
Rejoining Walls. Inc. will provide or be responsible for
A Engmeenng design detail required to secure bulldmg permit or other appropriate government agency approval Wall design to be be
on crv0 englne9nng site call and Falls antena Ipmpr ed by owner contractor.
B Suoen +sing t-e F.nsh gmd•ng for all CRIBLOCK crib otainng wells.
C A 1 CRIBICCK materials and labor necessary to erect the retaining walls
D labor and egbpment 1G compact backh!: Tell 'within the crib well, and immediately barred the well to a maximum of two feet in
neighr
Contractor /Owner will provide or be responsible for:
E Secunnp Building Permit or other approvals necessary to commence work, and payment of all fees related thereto
F All excavation reawred for crib wall as per engineered design
G All engineered sicking fe, location of wall and control points.
H Europe backiul material stockpiled as directed by us
I. Water for compactln at stockpile and wall locations
J Sol l and compaction tests as may be required
K. Reworking Of foundation soil if required
L All dra.nap? materials mi,u and as per engineered design
M Any shcrmg rhot may No required
N Earth mo.ement caused by flooding Fidrng or acts of others
C Au other condition, not specifically Opened by R W I
Perfprmarl
II !hs arocasai Is aCCecrea work will begin within fen working days or receipt of n building permit or appropriate authorization. Estimated time
To complete 15 -- - -- walks, days sub l l to deals beyond Our re,Aor:abler cONrol
Validity This oopsal u'.c d
un!i1 ___ ) _ and prices a.toted are firm provided nc!uol consltuctron commences wilsin 6
monlns Of dKolotarce d^.!?
PAYMENT TERMS. , .111'1 - hc.n 1 T ^rl•, 1:; rlt=i'.Fnre(✓, '`p )'tllo^ ,hl^ V'1Pn int` is Gri -irtI .
Late po'ImeNS sno 1 bear nferesf at the rate of Ile% per month
ATTORNEY'S FEES 'hould nn/ opnon be brought at either law or emity to either enforce of Interpret This agreement. Man the prevailing parry
shall not nnf, t'Rd to hccyer oasis and remonable attorneys fees
ADDENDUM
PLEASE LGr, AT,, ONE COPY FOR OUR FILE, WORK CANNOT PROCEED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE
Accepted RETAINING WALLS, INC. Contractor State License No 377577
By By—
Date
Date `CngUi,{x:9' :'o✓%
yl ,rCRIBLOCK`n
/ tmd�m d
kancho Cucamo:yna Chamber of Commerce
8137 MALACHITE AVE., SUITE A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
TELEPHONE: 714W7-1012
December 13, 1982
RE: Agenda Item for Next CLOUT Meeting
Dear CLOUT Member:
There is a consensus among CLOUT members that
planning and financing improvements to our circulation
system is one of our most important common goals.
Therefore, our next meeting, on Friday, December 17,
1982 at the Ontario Holiday Inn at 7:45 a.m. will
include: a discussion of specific circulation systems
goals for 1983, and; the level of coordination among
CLOUT members and other involved organizations that
might best achieve these goals.
Another involved organization is the Baldy
View BIA. As a "think piece" for our Friday dis-
cussion I am enclosing a proposal prepared for the
BIA, describing a specific list of circulation system
goals and tasks to be accomplished in 1983. The work
proposal should be read as an initial list of specific
goals to be accomplished,not necessarily by any one
specific consultant or organization. For example,
the work described in the proposal for Rt. 30 is now
scheduled to be done by the joint public -- private
"Rt. 30 Committee ", with the private sector directly
involved in that committee as oeposed to operating
as a separate "special interest' group.
Hopefully the paper may help us to better
define some of our relationships and activities within
CLOUT for 1983.
Yours trull yy ,
Jeff Sceranka
Executive Director
REGISTERED BONDS
AND THE REGISTRATION PROCESS
MILLER h SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS, INC.
505 Lomas Santa Fe Drive, Suite 100, Solana Beach, CA 92075 -0819
Phone (619) 481 -5894 or (800) 542 -6032
IMiller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
WHAT IS A REGISTERED BOND?
A registered bond is an evidence of indebtedness issued by a
municipality in the name of the owner. Payments of interest on the
obligation are sent directly to the owner by the issuer or its designated
paying agent. The owner of the bonds is not required to present a coupon
or any other evidence of ownership in order to receive the interest
payment.
The registered bond, therefore, is physically different than a
bearer bond in that it has no coupons attached. Usually the registered
bond is the size of a stock certificate (approximatley 8 inches by 12
inches).
As noted above, the fact that interest payments are sent directly
to the owner represents a distinct advantage over coupon bonds. The
owner does not need to remember to clip the coupons when they mature
and present them for payment. Automatic payment of interest is also
attractive to the paying agent who is not required to process thousands
of coupons on each interest payment date.
A second major advantage to the owner of a registered bond
concerns security. Because the bond is registered to a specific owner,
that certificate may not be redeemed by anyone else (except under
unusual circumstances such as the settlement of an estate, etc.). A
coupon or bearer bond is a negotiable instrument and is worth its face
value at maturity to whoever possesses the certificate. The registered
bond may come in a variety of denominations within a single maturity
(usually multiples of $5,000), while the coupon bond is most often in the
denomination of $5,000. With the advantages of registered bonds,
however, come certain disadvantages.
Because registration represents an additional administrative step in
both the issuance and transfer process, bond underwriters, dealers. and
many investors prefer bearer bonds. The name of the owner of a
registered bond appears on the certificate and on the books of the
municipality or its designated registrar(s). Ownership can change only
with re- registration. Transfer instructions need to be submitted to the
registrar with the bond before a transaction can take place and this
process can result in delays that are unacceptable to many investors.
® Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
ISSUING REGISTERED BONDS
A number of additional administrative steps are required in the
process of issuing registered bonds. In roughly chronological order these
additional steps include: (1) identification of a registrar; (2) design of a
registered certificate that is compatible with the registrar's system; (3)
providing for bond printing and timely delivery of bonds to the registrar;
(4) coordination of registration instructions; (5) signing of registered
pieces; and (6) "packaging" registered bonds.
Identification of Registrar: As noted above, a change in ownership
of a registered bond requires cancellation of the old certificate, re-
issuance of a new bond and the recording of that transaction on the
books of the municipality or its designated registrar. Prompt transfer of
bonds from one owner to another by the registrar is an important
consideration (see section below on transfer of registered pieces for
additional information). The future marketability of a municipality's
new bond issues may be determined by the ease with which registered
transfers take place.
To facilitate timely and accurate payment of interest when due, it
is recommended that the same institution serve as both paying agent and
registrar. This reduces the possibility of error that is present when two
separate institutions must reconcile transfer instructions with the pay-
ment registrar before each payment date. For the same reason
municipalities must carefully weigh the value of designating a registrar
and co- registrar.
It is important to note that institutions registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission are required to meet certain
performance guidelines. Most of these firms must complete the transfer
of registered items within 72 hours of receipt. Failure to satisfy this
requirement on at least 95% of the pieces received can result in the
institution being prevented from taking on any new business.
Municipalities are encouraged t� seek registrars that provide the
most efficient transfer capability. Contracts for these services, if not
undertaken with a Registered Transfer Agent, should specify the turn-
around time for re- registration and should require disclosure by the
registrar of any failure to comply with the agreed upon terms.
IMiller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
Selection of a registrar should be made only after carefully
considering the composition of the clients to be served. Local govern-
ments, especially smaller units, probably should not try to do their own
registration. No matter how efficient their operation is, underwriters'
concerns about timely transfer will be translated into higher interest
rates when new issues are sold.
Design of Registered Bond: Prior to the printing of registered
bonds the issuer should work with its designated registrar to ensure that
the certificate size and format satisfy any requirements of the regis-
trar's system. As noted above, most registered pieces are roughly the
size of a stock certificate. Space is provided on the back of the
registered bond for transfer /assignment instructions. When dealing with
a registrar or co- registrar the bond must provide space for the manual
signature of an officer of that institution. The registrar's manual
signature "activates" the bonds issued in the transfer process.
Bond Printing and Delivery to Registrar: Once the registered bond
form has been approved, the issuer must decide how many bonds are to
be printed. With bearer bonds the printing order was determined by
simply dividing the principal amount of the issue by $5,000, the denomi-
nation of each bond. Because registered bonds may be delivered in
$5,000 denominations or any multiple thereof, the issuer does not know
how many bonds will be needed for closing until final instructions are
received from the underwriter. Additionally, a supply of blank bonds will
be needed by the registrar (and co- registrar) to use in the re- registration
process over the life of the issue.
A good rule of thumb, at least for the initial order, is to print
twice as many bonds as would be needed if the entire issue was delivered
in $5,000 denominations. For example, a $10 million issue would require
the printing of 4,000 bonds (($10,000,0001$5,000) x 2 = 4,000).
Note that if the interest rates and maturity dates are to be
imprinted on the bonds, that the issuer will have to allocate a specific
number of bonds for each maturity. In the example cited above, the
issuer might have 100 bonds printed for the 8.5% 1990 maturity, 110
bonds printed for the 8.70% 1991 maturity, etc. The number of bonds
printed for each maturity will be determined by the number of years the
bonds will be outstanding and the principal amount of the maturity.
® Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
To reduce delays in ultimate delivery of the registered bond to the
purchaser, the issuer should try to do as much of the bond printing as
possible before the sale date. The printer can be selected and the text
of the bond form and legal opinion can be provided. This will permit
preparation of a proof of the bond before the sale date. Immediately
following the sale the printer can be given interest rates and any
necessary corrections to the proof.
Careful attention to the printing schedule is required because the
registration process represents a new administrative step between sale
and delivery of the bonds. Once the bonds are printed they are to be
delivered to the registrar. That institution will then follow the regis-
tration instructions that have been provided by the purchaser.
Coordination of Registration Instructions: Immediately after sale
of the bonds, the issuer should inform the purchaser of the date by which
registration instructions must be provided to the registrar. This deadline
should be reasonable and should be established by working backward from
the closing date and providing adequate time for signing and packaging.
The registrar should be given the name of a contact person at the
underwriting firm so that the activities of each participant can be better
coordinated.
Signing of Registered Pieces: Once the bonds have been prepared
for delivery by the registrar, they are ready to be signed. Many bonds
require the signature of an officer of the issuer. This can usually be
accomplished by using a facsimile signature printed on the bonds. In
such cases, the bonds prepared for delivery will need to be signed by both
the municipal official and an officer of the institution that serves as
registrar (the signature of the registrar will be by hand).
The bonds to be held by the registrar for re- registration will also
be signed by the municipal official -- but not by the registrar. The
registrar's authenticating signature will not be placed on these bonds
until the date of issuance.
Packaging Registered [fonds: On the business day prior to the
closing, the managing underwriter will want to make arrangements to
"package" the bonds that have been registered for delivery. The
packaging consists of verification that issuance complies with the
instructions that have been provided and general preparation of the
bonds for re- delivery to other syndicate members after closing.
IMiller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
TRANSFER OF REGISTERED BONDS
As the earlier portions of this articl- suggest, the sale, trade, or
other exchange of registered bonds is more - omplicated than a compa-
rable transaction involving bearer bonds. The bonds being sold must be
Presented to the registrar and a new certificate in the name of the new
owner must be prepared before the transactioi is complete. The
importance of an efficient transfer process cannot be overstated.
Investors will quickly identify and avoid those municipalities with poor
re- registration performance.
To standardize the process to the exent possible, the Public
Securities Association is encouraging the Municipal Securities Rule -
making Board to establish a standard "record date." The record date is
used in the re- registration process to permit transfer agents to properly
credit accrued interest to the accounts of registered bondholders. The
PSA suggests that the record date be 15 days prior to the interest
payment date, the standard date employed by corporate transfer agents.
The issuer cannot assume that its responsibilities end with the sale
and delivery of the bonds. Provisions for timely transfer of registered
pieces is an essential component of the process. Those municipalities
that show little concern for efficient re- registration of their bonds will
be penalized by the market when new issues are offered.
CONCLUSIONS
The issuance of fully registered bonds will be possible without
undue hardship as long as issuers recognize that additional effort will be
required. The few hours required to carefully plan for the issuance of
registered bonds will be time well spent. Such planning will ensure that
the municipalities' obligations are satisfied and that time - consuming and
frustrating delays are avoided.
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, December
15, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon D.
Mikels.
Present were: City Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II,
Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Edward
A. Hopson, Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd
Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill
Holley; and City Planner, Rick Gomez.
Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve
the minutes of November 17, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Mr. Schlosser announced he would not be attending the January 19, 1983
City Council meeting.
b. City Clerk, Lauren Wasserman, requested a closed session to be held
following the regular meeting of the City Council, and also requested that
item (,1) on the consent calendar be amended to include the additional cost
of $2500 for an EIR. Total cost of loan request $17,500.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -12 -15 in the total amount of
0322,671.63•
b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mary M. Harkins and Baquer Mirza, Bravo (1)
Pizza, 8800 -B Base Line Road, for On Sale Beer A Wine License.
c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Edwin H. and Ruth M. yischer, (2)
Heidelberg Delicatessen, 8798 19th St., for On Sale Beer A Wine Eating
Place License.
d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Joe and Sharon Lee Davidson, Deane's, (3)
8108 San Bernardino Rd., for On Sale General Public Premises License.
e. Approval of Changes to the Urbanized Boundaries and the Federal Aid Urban (4)
System.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN
ROADS TO BE IN THE FEDERAL -AID URBAN SYSTEM.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RAY AND
NANCY JONES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN SAME.
(6) g. Cooperation Agreement with the County of San Bernardino to Provide
Assistance in Obtaining I.R.S. 1031h Multiple Family Housing Mcrtgage
Bond. This agreement provides for San Bernardino County to act as the
issuing authority for a multiple family mortgage bond issue to be used on
an approved multiple family housing development east of Archibald Avenue
and 19th Street.
(7) h. Request for approval of right -of way documents for final remaining parcels
in Assessment District 82 -1.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR STREETS AND
STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1.
(8) i. Release of Bond and Notice of Completion.
*Parcel Map 6322 - located on Foothill Blvd. east of Vineyard Ave.
(Gemco) . Owner: Lewis Development Co.
Performance Bond (Road) $223,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR PARCEL MAP 6322 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
(9) J. Request Loan to Redevelopment Agency to fund Day Creek Bureau of
Reclamation Grant. Total amount of loan request is amended to $17,500.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar
as presented. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC RBARINGS.
(10) A. VACATION OF TRR
continue public hearing for the vacation of the service road located on the
southside of Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted
by Vista Investment. Report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being none, the
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to continue item to February
2, 1983, City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing.
• Gene Kearin, 28914 Roadside, Agoura, owner of the project announced he
was present to answer any questions council may have.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 187•
ORDINANCE NO. 187 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 131 -61 AND 62, LOCATED ON THE NEST
SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF MONTE VISTA
STREET FROM R -1 TO R -3•
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 187. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels set January 5, 1983, for second reading of the ordinance.
C. ORDERING ANIMTION 00. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR
TRACT NO. 12040. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 82 -208.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NO. 12040.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of
Resolution 82 -208. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to adopt Resolution No. 82-
208. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT'S
A. RED HILL COURYRY CRAB DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATION. Staff report by Lloyd
Hubbs. Review of request from Red Hill Country Club to participate in
construction, of retaining wall to stabilize slope on Red Hill Country Club
Drive north of Foothill Blvd. Continued from October 20, 1982, meeting in
order to obtain survey of property lines. Mr. Hubbs stated the survey
information would be costly and Mr. Crum would like the opportunity to discuss
the project with council.
At this time, Mr. Schlosser excused himself from the council table.
�e rrom the slope and building a retaining to wall. The
Country Club has already improved the drainage. Mr. Crum also
stated documentation was unavailable to show where property lines
were located and the cost of locating property lines would probably
be in excess of the cost to reinforce the bluff. He requested
council accept his proposal to install the retaining wall with Bed
Hill Country Club paying a maximum of $10,000 and the city paying
the remaining portion of $8,050.
Mayor Mikels stated if right of way was 40 ft. from center, city property
would, in fact, be located on the golf course. Mr. Crum stated that was
correct.
Mr. Buquet expressed concern about incurring added costs of relocating the
retaining wall if the street needed to be widened in the future.
Considerable discussion was held regarding the right of way being 40 feet from
center and determining the exact property line.
Mr. Buquet suggested an alternative solution would be to either taper the
bluff or to expand the width of the road. Mr. Crum stated the retaining wall
would be the least costly way to correct the problem.
Mr. Hopson stated if the bluff is on city property, the city has the entire
responsibility to correct the situation.
Mayor Mikels asked about restrictions if the land were privately owned and the
city corrected the problem. Mr. Hopson stated to eliminate a potential impact
on the adjacent public property it would be a justifiable expenditure. If
someone's private property ends up in the public right of way it is
technically their responsibility to remove it. He would not, however, like to
see a situation where an injury occurred even if private property were to fall
in public right of way and the public entity had noticed there was a problem,
even if the problem were concerning private land; public entity becomes
responsible in that circumstance.
Mr. Buquet stated a precedent could be set and other requests could be
submitted to the city to remove, for example, eucalyptus trees.
Mr. Hopson stated if council did not feel comfortable going along with the
project unless proper surveys were submitted either by Bed Hill or the City
Engineer, then this project should not be undertaken.
Mayor Mikels asked if a title search would be sufficient to locate boundaries
on surrounding properties and use those lines to determine property lines of
the proposed retaining wall. Mr. Hubbs stated a known line would have to be
established on one side of the boundary or another. Some boundary line would
have to be established and this would require a survey.
In resonse to a question by Mayor Mikels regarding actual cost of survey, Mr.
Hubby replied it was dependent on how extensive the engineer needs to go;
probably in the $21000- $4,000 range.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting to the public. There being no response, the
public section was closed.
Mr. Frost inquired as to who owns the wall and liability if ownership of the
property was not determined. Mr. Crum stated if council proceeds with
Project, construction of wall would be supervised by city and city would
maintain the wall. Red Hill Country Club would maintain the top of the wall
inward and provide backfill material between the wall and the bank.
Mr. Hopson was not able to provide an answer at this time.
Mayor Mikels expressed concern regarding involvement by the city in ownership
and maintenance of a structure to benefit private property.
Mr. Hopson stated if the property line is eventually established to the
satisfaction of the city, which determines the wall is on private land, the
wall, maintenance of the wall, and maintenance of the slope would become the
responsibility of the Country Club. If the street were widened with future
development, it could be feasible to establish engineering documentation at
that time.
Mr. Dahl, in agreement with Councilman Buquet, added property lines should be
determined, but also felt it was not economically feasible. He suggested the
city participate in installing the retaining wall to the extent of $8,500
maximum.
Mr. Frost asked about the holding capacity of the road and whether there would
be a need to widen the road. Mr. Hubbs replied more than a two lane road was
not needed or desirable; there may be future widening on the south and east
with new development. Mr. Frost asked if the road could stay in its existing
state. Mr. Hubbs replied same areas would benefit by renovating rather than
increasing the capacity of the road.
Mr. Dahl expressed concerned with immediate liability the city would incur if
the road washes away.
Mayor Mikels asked if council decides to build the road to find out right of
way is 40 feet from center and city decides they want no maintenance or
ownership of wall. Mr. Hopson replied, the city would receive a contribution
from Red Hill Country Club to construct public improvement. If a private wall
is constructed on city property, the city could do what it wanted to with the
wall. City could not own the wall if the land is privately owned. Ownership
of wall is dependent on ownership of the land.
Mr. Frost suggested council go back to the budget process with this along with
capital improvements project.
Mr. Dahl inquired as to the traffic count. Mr. Hubbs estimated 3,000 -4,000
cars per day.
Mr. Buquet asked without determining where the property line is, what would
happen if property owners on the south and east decide to improve property and
we find property line where the center line is at this time. He could
possibly end up with a one lane road.
• Mr. Crum stated the crib block wall is easy to remove if necessary.
Motion: Buquet moved to take no action on this request. Motion dies for lack
of second.
Motion: Frost moved to direct the City Engineer to include on his list for
inclusion in the budgetary consideration review for capital improvements by
the Citizens Advisory Commission and City Council for the fiscal year 1983-
84. Seconded by Dahl.
• Mr. Crum stated this offer will be withdrawn at the end of the year
when the bid expires.
a at 8:37 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:51 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
6. CIrr ATTOENET's RMEfs.
7. COUNCIL BOS11M.
(12) A. SRLECTION OF RRPBSBENTATIVE FOR SCAW BOARD. On January 5, following
SANBAG meeting, a representative to South Coast Air Quality Management
District Board will be selected for this two year appointment. Mayor Mikels
requested council input regarding which nominee to support for the
selection. Names submitted for nomination are Councilman Tom Sawyer, City of
Rialto, and Councilwoman Faye Dastrup, City of Ontario.
Mr. Frost stated since a representative from our immadiate vicinity should be
to our advantage, he recommends Faye Dastrup to serve on the board.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to support Councilwoman Dastrup
for nomination as representative for SCAQMD. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
(13) B. CITT COUNCIL APpOINTKU= 10 PAR[ ADFISORT COMMITTEE. Mayor Mikels
announced pursuant to newly adopted Resolution 82 -203 creating a Park Advisory
Committee there were five seats on the committee that needed to be filled, and
recommended the following to council for ratification.
Pam Henry, Livia vallance - Alta Loma
T. Harrell Allen, Peter Pitassi - Cucamonga
Jim Banks - Etiwanda
Pam Henry to serve as chairperson
Mr. Frost recommended Nacho Gracia to serve on the committee.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to ratify recommendation of Mayor
Mikels. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels announced the meetings would be held the third Thursday of each
month; the first meeting to be held in January. Committee appointments -elect
to take effect the third Thursday of January. Mayor Mikels recommended they
be appointed as committee persons -elect to have terms commence concurrent with
the first meeting. Mr. Dahl recommended council direct Bill Holley, Community
Services Director, to provide Park Advisory Committee agenda at the January
City Council meeting.
(14)C. CHRISTMAS HOUSE
Mr. Buquet presented a Christmas House update. If bids for the Christmas
House were not acceptable when opened December 16, 1982, he felt the price
could possibly be reduced and we could negotiate with owners of the house.
Mr. Buquet requested city council give support to movement of house to
Cucamonga- GUasti Park. Mr. Dahl added that by going into a limited point
venture, our city could retain a say in the management and uses for the
building.
- -t in _ city, .ly become
established as an historical landmark.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to express Rancho Cucamonga's
interest in participating in the acquisition of the Christmas House and its
movement to the Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park in cooperation with the City of
Ontario, San Bernardino County, and private sector.
Motion carried by the following vote. AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser.
NOES: Frost, Mikels.
Mr. Frost commented that efforts could be spent by working with the new owner
and encouraging the use in the city.
8. ADJOUBlEXT.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to adjourn to closed session not to
reconvene. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:30
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sit a� � n
Mary Kuhn
Acting Deputy City Clerk