The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993/06/16 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 16, 1993 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130 ar• City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Covncilmember Charles J. Buquet, Courtcilmember Rex Gutierrez, CouncilmemLer Diane Williams, Cauncilmember •rs Jack Lam, City ,Nnnager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-18b1 PAGE City Council Agenda June 76, 1993 t All items submitted for the Clty Council Agenda must be in writing, The deadline for submitting these Items is 6:00 p.m, on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The Clty Clerk's Of}ice receives all such Items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Baguet-, Alexander_,Stout _, Wfliari75 _, dnd Gufienez_ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamation honoring the American Radio Relay League's Worldwide Amateur Radio Field Day to be held June 26 and 27,1993. 2. Presentation of Proclamation to Fasson Merchant Products Division of Avery•Dennison for receiving the Clean Air Award from the South Coal? Air 9uality Management District. 3. Presentation of Proclamation to the 8th Grade Social Studies Class of Vineyard Junior High School for }heir participation antl success in the American Vouth Ctt¢enship competition. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State lew prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Cliy Council mey receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per Individual. 2 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items ere a:petted to be routine and non•controverslal. They will be acted upon by the Council et one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed 6y a Councllmember or member of the audience for discussion. t. Approval Of Minutes: May 19, 1993 PAGE City Connell Agenda June 16, 1983 2 2. Approval of Wananis. Register Nos. 5/26/93, 6/2/93 and 6/9/93: 1 and Payroll ending 5(20/93 for the total amount of S5.146,342.95. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 11 May 31,1993. 4. Approval }o aufhor¢e the adverting of the 'Notice Inviting &ds' 15 for the Asphalt Resurfacing on Helms Avenue, between Ninth Street and Arrow Highway and Lucas Ranch Rood, Fourth Steet to F'rfth Street and Santa Anita, Fourth Street to End of Road, to be n,ntled from Street Rehabilitation. Account No. 09-4637-9002. RESOLUTION N0.93-124 I6 A RESOLUION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ASPHALT RESURFACING IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to reject all bids for the Chatfey-Garcia Born 20 Construction ProjecT 6. Approval to adopt the Five-Near Capttal Improvement Program 21 and Twenty-Near transportation Plon. RESOLUTION NO.93-125 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FIVE-NEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-NEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASUREIFUNDS 7. Approval to author¢e the removal of automotive parts from 32 irreparable vehicles to use as spare parts for other City fleet vehicles. 8. Approval of Annual Loan Transaction between The CRy of Rancho 33 Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. 9. Approval of a Resolution committing to develop the local portion 3q of the Transportation Control Measure Subreglonal Implementation Program in accordance with the requirements of the 1991 South Coast Air 9ualMy Management Plan and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide. PAGE City Council Agenda L-`x.~ June 16, 1993 ~ O~`~ ~ 3 RESOLUTION N0.93-126 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CffY COUNCIL OF THE CffV Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUr-0RNIA, COMMITTING TO DEVELOP THE LOCAL PORTION OF THE TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE SUBREGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RE9UIREMENTS OF THE 1991 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENIT PLAN AND THE 1992 FEDERAL ATTAINMENT PLAN FOR CARBON MIXJOXIDE 1D. Approval to Accept Redl Property Improvement Contract and 41 Lien Agreement from Randal G. Allen. Mariryn S. Allen, S. Todd Allen and Joy A. Allen, for asingle-family residence, booted on the west side of Valle Yuta, north of Camino Sur. RESOLU110N NO.9&127 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CfIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMEM CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RONDAL G. ALLEN. MARILVN S. ALLEN. S. TODD ALLEN AND JOV A. ALLEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CIN CLERK TO SIGN SAME 11. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for InstallaTlon 44 of a portion of a Master Plannetl Storm Drain LIne within Hlliside Road and Sapphire Sireei, and Sapphire Street at fhe Banyan Street Channel, in connection with development of Tract No. 13728, submitted by HIIWde/Sapphire Venture. RESOLUTION NO.93-128 45 A RESOLUTION OF 11iE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INS'iALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMEM OF TRACT NO. 13728 PAGE City Council Agenda June 16, 1993 4 12. Approval of a ResolNbn aufhor6ing the redemption of the City's 47 Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A, Approving a Mortgage Loan Purchase Contract and a Memorandum of Understanding, and providing for other matters properly related thereto, and opproval to execute coMraC15 with Whipple, Kiruell & O'Neal, Incorporated (CO 93-036) to serve as Placement Agent and Stone & Youngberg (CO 93-37) to serve os Financial Advisor in the sale of the remaining mortgages under the 1983 and 1984 Redevelopment Agency and City mortgoge bond programs. RESOLUTION NO. 93-129 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAl1FORNIA, AUTFiORILNG THE REDEMPTION OF THE CITY'S HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS. 1984 SERIES A, APPROVING A MORTGAGE LOAN PURCHASE COMRACT AND A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO 13. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement (CO 93-038) for g2 Ins'•;)ation of a Master Poanned Storm Droin Facility in connecibn with development of CUP 88-46, located of the southwest comer of Hellmon Avenue and Bose Une Road. submitted by Pioneer Bank RESOLUTION NO. 93-130 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WfM DEVELOPMEM OF CUP88-46 14. Approval to execute Cantroct Change Order No. 4 to the 55 Professional Services Agreement wffh Parson-Brinkerhoff-9uaid and Douglas, Incorporated. CO 89-001, Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard Interchange Modification, Account No. 16-50300 for Design Changes and Additional Designs required by CaBrans, 15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 56 Tract 13114, located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prodo, submited by Bayoun Development PAGE - City Council Agenda June 16, 1993 5 RESOLUTION N0.93131 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CBV COUNCIL OF THE CBY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURf1V FOR TRACT 13114 16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 59 Tract 14407, located on the southwest comer of Bose Une Road and Mountain Yew Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLURON NO. 93132 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14407 17. Approval to accept Improvements, Releose of Bonds and Notice 62 of Completion for Parcel Map 11472, located on the soNh side of 19th Street east of Hermosa Avenue. Release: Faithful Pertortnance Bond (Street) S 11,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guorantee Cash Deposit (Street) 1.100.00 RESOLUTION NO. 93133 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTV COUNCIL OF THE CffV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS f4R PArh;EL MAP 11472 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval to accept Public Improvements and Reduction of 64 Performance Security for the Private Improvements for Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Avenue south of Foothill Boulevord. Release: FoBnful Pertormonce Letter of Cred'R S 430,OOD.00 Accept: Reduced Faithful Pertormonce L/C 118A00.00 RESOLUTION NO. 93134 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEMS FOR TRACT 12895 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK PAGE City Council Agenda June 76, 7993 6 19. Approval to accept Improvements for the Landscaped Entry 67 locatetl on the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Hwen Avenue. RESOLUTION N0.93135 68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CfIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEMS FOR THE LANDSCAPED ENTRV LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE UNE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings ere expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without dlscussion. The Clty Clerk will read the title. Any item cen be removed for dlscussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROV ANN IA N ,IN R'S R PORT AND 69 RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL IEW OF ASSE SMENTS WITHIN THE S PARK AND RECREATION IA^.PR0~2M. NT DISTRI T (PD-85) FOR TH FISCAL VFAR 1993/94 (Continued hom June 2, 7993) RESOLUTION NO. 43136 ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CIIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, i0 LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) 2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROV ANN IA N ,IN FR'S DEPORTS AND 90 RESOUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSECMENTS l"9THIN I ANDSGAPE MAINTENANCE DLTRICTS NOS 1 2 7A '7B 4 5 6 7 AND B FOR FSCAL YEAR 1993.i/9d (COnNnued hom Juno 2, 1993) PAGE City Council Agenda June 16, 1993 7 RESOLUTION NO.93-137 92 A RESOLIJRON OF THE CffV COUNCIL OF THE CffV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNL4, TO LFW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISR2ICT NOS. 1. 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND B PURSUAM TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACf OF 19/2 3. CONSIDERATION TO A?PROVF ANN IA N IN R'S R PORT AND 154 RESOWTION FOR THE ANN IAL I W OF ASS SSM NTS WITHIN srnEEf I ,HP - MAI NAN DLSiRICTS NOS 1 a g 5 h 7 ND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 (t.artlinued ham Juno T, 1993) RESOLUTION N0.93-138 156 A RESOLURON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET UGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2.3, 4, 5.6, 7 AND B PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND UGHTING ACT CF 1972 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE MASSA, CHNI -tAN R6"IT 223 ORDINANCE TO -FAN IP AN - IA ,F n r'ARDIN TFN"PORARV PERMITS ORDINANCE N0.48SB 224 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CffV COUNCIL OF THE CIIV Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SECTION 9.24200 OF CHAPTER 924 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMRS PAGE City Council Agenda June 16, 7993 8 H. CITY MANAGER'c_ STAFF REPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meetfng for public input. No ITems SubmlFfed. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following Items have been requested by the Clty Council for discussion. They are nol public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND STREAMLINE GTV COUNCIL 225 SUBCOMMITTEES (CaoOmrad hom June 2, 1993) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identHy the Items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be discussed at this meeting, only Identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUpilr' This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Couneil. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to }ive minutes per Individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSSION PENDING LITIGATION WITH O b B EQUIPMENT COMPANY. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO JUNE 17, 1993 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO ADOPT THE FISCAL YEAR 7993/94 BUDGET. PAGE Cily Council Agenda June 16, 1993 9 I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Fancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June t0, 1993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 19, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA crrY couNCa MINUTES A regular mcedng of the Rarrcho Cucanauga City CouncB was held on Wednesday, May 19, 1993, in die Council Chambers of the Civic Center, krcated at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The mcedng was :ailed m ceder at 7:21 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couroilmembers: William 1. Alezarider, Charles 7. Buquet II, Rex Gudertez. Diane WilBams, aM Mayor Dennis L. Smut. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager, lames Markman, City Avomey; Jerry B. Fulwaod, Deputy City Manager, Rick Gomez, Community Development Direcux; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager, Brad Buller, City Planner, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Cindy Norris, Assceiem Planner, )ce O'Neil, Cily Engineer; ShinW Bose, Deputy City Engineer, Sigmund Dellhime, Managancnl Arudyst 11; Cindy Hackett, Associate Psgirtcer; Jce Smfa, Associam Engineer; Suzanne Om, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyze II; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Duane Baker, Aaeistant m the Ciry Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst h, Chief Dennis Michael, Alez Ahumada, Adminisuativc Services Omcer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pmtwtion D$vict; Capp Bruce Zeiroq Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams. City Clerk, .....• B?. Pnsenmtion of Pmclamatlon declaring the Month o(May az Older Americans Month. Mayor Smut prcscnmd the proclamation to members of the Senior Advisory Committee. .»~~~. C l . Rance Clouse, President, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber was misquoted in 1'he /nfwd Palley Daily Bu!(etin regarding thev position on Meawre "U", He slated drey have rqt made a recommendation to support or oppose This matmr. He commended the City Council and sett on its proposed 1993N4 budge, He continued m read a lever which is on file in die office of die City Clerk. He sated he realizes that Uie problems Uo Ciry has ore because of Slam mandates. He staled the Chamber hoks forward to wor{:ing with the Council. City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 2 C2. Jacquelyn Green, 11189 Summerside, Grifrn Homes, stated she and her neighbors have coru:errts because the project is not completed. She sated they get no response from the City on their sweets because they have test been mnrW over to the City as yet. She was also concerrtW about their roofing warranty and worrdcred if dre bonds the City is still holding could be used for some of their warranty items if the developer cmild na take cme of than. Mayen Stout asked that Rick Gomez. Community Devebpment Director, work with Ms. Gnxn on this matter m assist them B possible. .... Dl. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 428N3 arM 5/5/93; and Payro6 ending 422/93 fm the toml amount of $1,476,283.45. D2. Appmval m receive and file taarerit Investment Schedule as of Agil 30, 1993 D3. Alcoholic Beverage License Applintian for Off-Sale Bus & Wires Ealing Place for Chinese Lilac Fast Food, Chinese Lilac Fast Fend Incorporated, 9155 Base Line Road aL. D4. Akoholic Beverage Lkxnse Applicadnn fa On Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place far Vince's Spagheai, Buv. Cassia & Sons, Incorgaated, 5211 Foothill Boulevard. D5. Approval to authorize dre Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bida" for the Nineteenth Street Reconstruction Improvement Project, between Carnelian and Amethyst Sweets, m he funded from Measure I (Loral) Fund, Account No. 32-0637-9031 and SB 140 Fund, Account No. 35-0637-9031, RESOLUTION N0.93-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALHaORMA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "NINETEENTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT PROTECT" W SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval m amend Fiscal Year 1992N3 Appropriations. D7. Approval m allow stadium terimrt to iasmll 440 temporary bleacher seats wish backs at the stadium located souN of Foothill and on the west side of Rochester Avenue for We 1993 baseball season. D8. Approval of Summary Vacation of portions of Red Hill Country Club and Rancheria Drives, located az the northwest comer of said drives (APN 207-123-OS). RESOLUTION N0.93-111 A RESOLUTION pF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB AND RANCHERIA DRIVES City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 3 D9. Approval (m the American Radio Relay League to use Heritage Park fm the Amateur Radio Operators Field Day Exercise on Juan 26 and 27, 1993. DIO. Approval b execute agreement (CO 93-033) between dte Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga fm use of Etiwanda High School Pools and adjacent facilities fm Summer Aquatics Classes. Cost will be offset by registration fees paid from Accoum No. 13-0563-6028.4211. DI t. Approval b execute agreement (CO 93-034) between the Chatfey loin( Union High School District and the City of Rancho Qrcanwnga fm use of Alta Loma High School Pools aM adjacent facilities fm Summer Aquatics Classes. Cost will be offset by aquatic registration tees paid from Accatnt No. 13-0563-6(Y28-0211. D12. Approval m execute Improvement Agreement and Lmprovemcnt Security tm 6864 Hellman Avenue, boated on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pcppcridge Lane, submitted by James R. Party of William Pe+ry Roo0ng, RESOLUTTON NO. 93-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6864 F~I,LMAN AVENUE D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agrcement Extension fm Tract 12870, bested on Ote northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue arM High WM Avenue, submitted by Daly Hanes. RESOLUTION N0.93-I 13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12670 DI4. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension fm Tmct 13930, located on Wilson Avenue betwcen Hellman Avenue acid Amethyst Avenue, submitted by Hix Development RESOLUTION N0.93-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13930 DI S. Approval m execute Improvement Agreement Extension fm Tmcts 14192 and 14192-1, located on the cast side of Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street, submitted by Hix Development. RESOLUTON N0.93-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 14192 AND 14192-1 DI6. Approval b execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14644, located at the eau end of Carrrellia Coun east of Beryl Sweet, submitted by Jorge Garcia. City Council Minute May 19, 1993 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 93-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14644 D17. Approval to execute an amendment y'. legal services agreement (CO 86-055) with Markman. Amzynski Hanson & King and the City of Rancho Curaarmga MOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Gutierrez m accept the recommetdations in the sfaR reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Mdiun cartied unanimously, 5-0. •r+~~• No items were submitted. •~~•~• ITEMS F1, F2, AND F~ WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME. FL COND CTIN • FIRST OF TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS PERTAINING TO THE LEVY OF ANNUAL AccECCMENTC WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT Dlc_TRICT (PD-8S Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced the item for the Assessment Districts, with Jce O'Neil, City Enginceq presenting the staf(reporL James Markman, City .\ttorrtey, reported on the Brown Act requirements and stated the notices inferred dmt these are new asseswnents, which E twt the case at this time. He Hated next year the rtodces wi0 be more undersmndable. Councilmember Buquet pointed out that dm Cucamonga County Water District was proposing an B.5% irKresse m they water rotes and smtcd Umt is why die increase is proposed for the IaMscaping Assessment Districts. Mayor Stout opened the meeting (or public hearing. Addressing We City Caurcil were: Elearar Ikdobay. 5031 Klusman, stated she represented the Jarvis Committee and Citizens Against Waste. She submitted a petition for the record and also presented the Council with a plant. She sated it is easy For the city m spenA Ne money from the residents aM also referred m City Hall as dre "Taj Mahal Councilmember Buquet stated the City Hall waz paid for out of Redevelopment money, not the taxpayers' money. He also smted that a lot of the artwork, etc., was paid for from the interest on the bond (ands fmm dw Agency. Tom Dedobay, 5031 Klusman, asked why some Districts got an assessment increase and some did not Maya Suwt stated that some arcaz, i.c., Deer Crcek, have Ihcir own Hamwwner's Association and they do rwl pay that directly m the City. City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 5 James Markman, City Attorney, explained that Nere were tw Assessment Districts prior m 1972. He explained how an Assessment District is formed when a development is built and how it is pal on Ne tax bill. He sated prior m 1972 there were homeowner's associations Nat peopb paid (m Nose Kings. He stated dm City is Trying to collect only dte money N pay for the upkeep of the Assessment District maintenanrc. Mr, Markman stated the amounts listed by Mr. O'Neil are the maximum amounts, but Nat dray may M lower Nan is projected at Nis time. Craig Hemler, Upland, talked about Measure "U" and That he did not Nink any of it would go towards education az Sheriff Williams has stated it would. He did trot Nink the County would do what they said they would do wiN dre money. He asked Nat the Council not support Measure "U". Dave Napa, 7050 Chicago Coup, sNteA he did tae agrce wiN Ne notice Nat was sent. Nat it waz unclear. He Baled after hearing Jce O'Neil's 57ati report, he is more clear artd understands why it is being done. He pointed out to the Council that all Ne residents are having a hard time making it. He asked that Ne Council watch for waste wihin Ne City's opemdons. Tony Marino, LMD 4, did trot Nink the Terra VISta residents should be Ne emly ones that have ro pay for Kings within their Assessment DislricLS. Marsha 8ailcy, 11 t79 Summerside, stated Key do na agree wiN Ute proposed assessmrnrs. She felt dray were paying for services that the cilY was not poviding to her. She stated they am paying fa amenities that dte Caryn residents have and did trot agrce wiN Nis. She stated her neighborhood does na mind paying razes (or Kings that they presently have in their neighborhood, but not until Key actually Aave Them. Tony Marion commented on tM assessment they have m pay for the four parks in his District. Mayor Stout commented Nat Nere arc Terra VisN residents that am afse using Red Hill and Heritage Parks. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer, staled the Engineering Reports explain where Nc money goes. Carol Haney in Victoria, smted she does not Nink Nat the City likes to keep wmer consumption a[ a minimum. She gave several examples of what she felt was water waste. She stated her ux bill has increased by double over dte last two years. She stated Ncre are increases in everything, but ttmt her salary hat not increased. She fah the City should do someNing N save money and rat charge the homeowners. Dennis Eddy, 13910 Claremont, stated he agreed wiN Ms. Haney, and felt the City should make cuts. Diane flmroi, 8606 CrceJcside, smted she agreed also wiN Ms. Haney and read an ardcle from Wald News Magvine. She asked if the residenus were going m get to vole on Nis or was it a done deal. Councilmember Alexander statrd it is not a done deal, and Nal it is a public hearing to hear what dtc residents have to say. lack Lam, City Manager, sNtcd at Ne conclusion of Ne Nird public hearing Ne Council will make a decision and vole on Nis maucr. Patrick Collins, 6596 Eciwarrda Avrauc, complimented the Council for what Ney have done, but asked what would the Council M when senior citizens lost Neu homes. He questioned what his rate was going N be, which Ice O'Neil, City Engirrceq answered. He stated he did na move his company N Rancho Cucamonga bemuse of the Utility Tax. He felt the City treads N be run like a business, and asked that dte Council rMirect Ne structure they arc working with, City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 6 Grin Clrevak, 10089Imn Mountain, commented on the nixes she is paying arM shat she does not fcel she tr getting any services for what she Imys. She fell her tax bill was incorrect Rick Gomez, Community Devekpment Dhecmr, soled snit( would 6e going over her ~ bill wish her mmomow. Mike Jones, 13938 Clarrrnont, felt the greenbelts should not have as much vegetation which would help reduce the assessment costs. Mark Elswonh, 13959 Clarenrorx, canrrrentW on Ure dclinquerrcks in tax bilfs and Nat the other residents are being asked N make up for Nose Nat am deBnquent and did not agree wiN Nis. He sated drat many of Ne streets in Brentwood are not dedicated m Ne City and why should he have m pay for all of his aSSeaanlent Jac O'NeB, CiIY Firgittcer, stated dre h»Mscaping fee does not go towards street impovements. Maya Stout commented that only 4% of the residents' properly lax drey pay actually goes m the City. Mr. Elsworth also questiorred dre assessments or EtiwaMa North. Ice O'Neil, City Engineer, stated he would be happy m sit down wiN Mr. ElswoM and explain Nis m him. Richard Cardona, 19395 Clarcngnt, did nor Nink the residents should have to pay for oNer people's delirgcent mz bills. He stated Shauna al Cucamonga Ceunty Water DLstrict sorted they are only raising dse water mta by 2%. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, shied that is incorrect and Nat the City has met wiN her to give tier Nc conccl information. Mr. Cardpra asked when the people will get same answus m their questions. Councilmember Buyuet commened on the budget cuts the City k making at the present lime. Clarence Conwell of Victoria, smuA dre residents are faced wiN a lot o(problems. He commented on water tieing waled in Ne landscaped areas. He tell the citirens should be allowed b shut the water off from Nc sprinklers when it rains. He felt dre Council should get the cmnmunity involved in helping ouL Councilmemher Akzander sated that it might be good for him m sit down wiN Mr. O'Neil and go through some of the costs he is questioning. Synma Enware, 7050 Newton, staled she pays a homeowner's association fee but still got an assessment notice. She did snit understand. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, aUlied staff would be happy m go over her mice wiN her and explain it Ms. Enware also complairred about Ne "no perking" signs on tier sweet and sorted ahe wished Ney could be mmovcd. Rick Gomez, Community Development Dircemr, stated sniff would work with heron Nis matter oleo. City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 7 Ms. Enware stated she would also 8ke b get the vets cut down near her house, Molina Hcmandez, 8816 Andover, commented on the assessment fa the rrx la near her house. She sorted the community does not use the tot lot, and that it is not being maintained. She crated she and hu neighbors do na want theta lat. Mayor Shut sorted he felt accepting the tot kM waz a mistake form the beginning aM asked that the residents work with the City b do something b the property that everyoro wgrld like. Mrs. Hertimrdcz felt the neighbors would want b do away with it canpletely. Councilmemher Gutiertez stated he contorted with Mayor Soul Doug Warren, 12477 Arlerbeny, felt the City should loolr for other ways ro save mq~ey before they raise azscswnrnts. He did not feel the City should start anything new at this point. Mike Magalano, 76(16 Sandpiper Court, stated he is not sore what the DiStricls mean a how they work. He felt the cost should be averaged among all the rrsidents. He hoped Ilnt the Smte does not gU any money by these assessments being charged b dre residents. He commented on the number of homes Ihst are far sale in dre neaghhohoM. He did not want the ineneau b go Through. Emilio Munoz asked that Central Park not be built because it would cost bo much b maintain. MOTION: Moved by Aleaartdrr, secoMe4 by Buquet b continue dre public hearings m Jmte 2, 1993, 7:110 p.m. Motion carticd unanimously, 5-0, Mayor Smut asked for dre rrsidcnls b submit any alternatives they may have in lieu of raising assessments W tlw City. «««rr• F2. CONDUCTING THE FTRST OF TWO P m I pRIN c p RTAININC TO TF, LEVV OF aNVR tp pct cc FNTC WITHBV c pPF MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS '~ 1 2 lp, 3B-4.5.6.7 ACID.H Discussion on This item i5 contained under Item FI. •r«rrr F3. COND t TIN TH FrRST OF TWO P118 I H ARIN C P RTAIN N TO Th ~ Y OF eNNUAL ASCFSCMFNTC WfI'HIN STREET I I H77N MAIN'"'NAb'CF DISTRICTS NOC 1 9 'i d 5 6 0 ANDA Discussion on this item is contained under Item Fl. rrrrrr r«««r« Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:52 p,m. The meeting was reamvened at 10:12 p.m. with ell members of Council present .««.r« City Council Minutes May 19. 1993 Page R F4. COMMUNITY DEVELOP NT 8 K RANT APP I AT10N ND FIN r CTA M rJ'r FOR PROGRAM YFA_R 199-94 ANO AMENDMENT TO THE 1989 90 ND 1992 91 FIN 1 CTA MFNTC FOR REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS - Tlw adoption of the Final Smament of Community Devebpment Objecdves for program year 1993-94 and the final selection of projecLt based on a grant of 5735.000.00 and 519,010.0 in program income, and rclaad amendments m the 1989-90 and 1992-93 Firal Smmments ro allow reprogramming of funds. Staff mport presentrxl by Larry Henderson, Principl Planner. Ceuncilmember Gutiertez asked if anything hat changed since Ne kttr meeting. Laity Hendeson, Principal Planner, sued Uat dm YWCA has been dropped from da recommendation cycle, along with the Sickle Cell Anemia organiralion and the Boy Scouts. He sated there were a lot of funds shitted m the Southwest Cu,^.amonga area arM that lame improvement funds wen also shifted a odor arras. Councilmember 6uquet wanted a make sure dre graffiti removal cost is tracked Laity Henderson, Principal Planner, explained the process for the tracking of this. Mayor S4wt opened the meeting (or public hearing. Addressing da City Council were: Kathy Rogers, Executive Dinxtor of YWCA, commended staff for working wiN has organizeuon. She continued a talk about the funding sources. She staled no matter what the Council does, they will still conhnue to assist those from Rartcho Cea<ananga who need their servkas. Ray Stuehnnann, 12440 Lily Court, stressed how important he felt communication is, Councilmember Gutierrez thankeA Ms, Rogers for her wodc. There being no funher:ntponse, the public headng was closed. RESOLUTION N0.93-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNTTI' DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1993-94 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 93-117 and adopt the recommendation presented in da staH report. Maion carried unanimously, 5-0. •araaa GI. Staff report pesentrA by Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II. He pointed out Iwo typographical enps in the Ordinance. He smted on page I of the Ordinance, under ReeiWs, Section vJ Ue sixth line should read "unincorporated areas" insaad of "ircorprmted auras." He sated on page 1 I, Section 6.02 the word "or" should be inserted between "this" and "any" on the first line. City Council Minuses May 19, 1993 Page 9 Mayor Stunt asked what was the sanction if the City did nos have an ordinance. Sigmund Dcllhime, Management Analyst II, stated the City could be bald in noncompiianre of the permit for fagure to do what is required. He stated are of Ne items is requiring the City m establish the legal autlrority to enforce the program, He stated if the City does not have a permi4 it is a $25,080 per day fine. The Council ezpresseu Nek disappmvl of this unfurled mandate. DcNa 7, Adams, City Clerk, read dre dde of Ordinance No. 512 Mayor Stout opened the mewing fa pubic hearing. Then; being no response, the public hearing was cbsed. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired as m whom the money would come Iran ur pay fa This. Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, stated it would be included in the budget for Fiscal Year 1993H4. Councilmember Buquet sated he has Nought this up m the legislative staff at SANBAG art everyone is working on this m let Sacramento know we are opposed to this. Courcilmember Alexander felt Nc City rieedcd k make its feelings krwwn before the Ordinance is adopted ORDNANCE NO.512 (foss reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, secondrA by Stour m waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 512 for June 2, 1993. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. rr~~~~ G2. CONSLDERATION TO AMEND CITY COCMCIL COMMISSION ORDINANCES Staff report presented by lack Lam, City Manager. Mayor Stout stated he wanted m make sure some of she language in Uw Ordinance art Resolution were clear. He poinkd out that the Historic Prcscrvation Commission would still exist as en entity, but that the Planning Commissioners would serve as dre Historic Preservation Commission. Mayor Stout opened the meeting (or giblic comments. Councilmcmber Williams pointers out in the Resolution that it should state the "members of the Planning Commission shoulA acs as the Historic Preservation Commissioners." slur Frost, Etiwanda, stated he did not think there should bu any alleralion to the Historic °reservelion Commission. He fdt Ne Council should postpone Nis in order to receive more infametlon from the public. He continued to give more history on Ne Ordinance creating Ne Historic Proservetion Commission. 1{e did not think Nere would be a cost savings by changing Ne swcwre of Nis Commission because the activitles of dre soft would remain the same. He did nor Nink the Planning Commission should assume these duties. He alw commented on dre money spent to provide support b the Community Foundation. City Council Minuses May 19, 1993 Page 10 Councilmember Alexander sated he didn't mtally agrce with Mr. Frost's comments on money spent cowards the Foundation because the City is rmt contributing m then. Councilmember Baguet stated the Council has just heard from the public Wat the City should find ways W an costs, and that Nis is orw way to do that. He sated the Council can, a[ any time in the future, reinstate any of llw Commissions. CounciMcmber Gutierrez stated he partially agrees wish what Mr. Forst was saying. He felt Nis was being done b cut cosec, but fell possibly the Historic Preservation Commission needed to be reconsidered. He stated he would like to further study t6c GriffiW StWy, He sorted he did agrce wild what was being proposed for the Public Safety Commission. Councilmember 8uquct staled the Council previously came up with the recommendation and did nos think they should go back and rehash all of this. He pointed out Urat the Commission swcture can always lie changed immediately in the future if it needs to. Councitmember Gudertez slated he is rws going m change his mind now on dre previous decision, bus felt Mr. Froze had some goad pants. Larry McNiel, 7482 Alta Cuesm Drve, questioned ar a Planning Commissioner, how he would also be handling Historic Preservatbn business. He cooed he E troubles about the current Commissioners having to reapply for then positions, and felt she Council was asking for Wem resigruliwt. Mayor Stout smreA Wit u rrot the case. Mr. McNiel stated he felt offense by Nis as far as having w resubmit an application. He slated he would rather be terminated Wan have m do Nis, He felt Wis was an embarrassing position for Ilre Commissioners Was have b reapply and may zed M mappamed. There being rro further response, public comments were closed. Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, read dre title of Ordinance No. 513. ORDINANCE NO. Sli (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.20.020 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 2.24.230 TO TITLE 2 AND REPEALING CHAPTER 2.2g AND 2.56 OF TTfLE 2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIIMCIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO POWERS AND DUTIES OF VARIOUS COMMISSIONS RESOLUTION N0.93-I i g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS TIIE MSTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY MOTION: Moved by Buquct, seconded by Alexander ro waive full reading of Ordinance No. 513 end sa sewnd reading for May 26,1993 and W adopt Resdudon No. 93-t lg u amended. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Couxil Minutes May l9. 1993 Page 11 +rrrrr H. CITY MANAOFR'S RTAFF REPORTS No items were submitted. «««rrr I. COUNCIL RUSINFSS I1. DISCUSSION OF CRFATfNO A PRIVATE/NON-PROFIT HISTORI 1 S TY (Oral Report) Mayor Stmt stated he asked for Nis item b be on the agenda because diem was rw historical society Wat covered Ne endm City of Raxho Cucamonga. He felt a problem with the Historic Commission was that it only had seven people involved in it, where a historic society cmW include many, many more. He felt Nis is best done in a private, non-profit historical sociey wiN no cmnecdon W Ne City, so they could make any recanmuMadms m the new Historic Prescrvadm Commissim. He felt some of dte current Historic Commissioners sbmW be asked q be part of Nis. Cmncilmember Gudemz asked how Nis wvukl get started. h1ayor Stmt sorted you find a core of people who are interesteA and tell Nem dte City world like them m pursue it, and hopefully it would go from dlere. Cmncilmember Williams felt Nis could be much mom powerful Wan dle Commission ever was 8md Buller, City Plam~er, slated dal at the previous Historic Pmservalion Commission mcedng, Ne issue did came up Nrough staff. He sated Ne City of Claremont has a historical society, and Nat Nis will be brought up again at Ne next Historic Preservation Commission mcedng and he cmld sec if they would be inkreated in doing Nis as a privme citizens. Mayor Stout sated he is willing W wait and see if the Hisoric Preservation Commission will be the catalyst, and if not, he would recruit tlm people himself. «.rr«r JIDENTIFICATION OP ITEMS FOR NF3m uygmrrur_ No items wcm identified (or the next mcedng. r+rr•r IS. COMMIINICAT10N5 FROM THE. PIIRt.iC KI. BAI McCliman mport on AB 102R, AB2392, and AB 3393 and how many convicts world be mt m Nc streets if Nex go Nmugh. Ha asked that dle City Cmxil oleo Ne time to write m legislators asking Nem to oppose Nis. He stated dory are trying to get S,qp cal is m dw kgislamrs in Sxmmen W m try b slop Nis. The Cmxil slated Ney am very concertmd about Nis also and wanted m call or write to Ry' W do sanelbing about it. City Council Minutes May 19, 1993 Page 12 •~~~~• MOTION: Moved by Baguet, secaoded by Akxatder to adjourn to a budgU meeting m be held an Wednesday, May 26, 1993, 6:60 p.m., in We Tri-Communities Confereatce Room. Morton sartied unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 1)ebm I. Adams, CMC City Cleric Approved: .• :: :; r 2 V • 1 [ NVP90 NNOO'•FHmNNrOOJ OJ^100J • N.OPJO NOFVwnJnFNOi•1a NOF.+00.•1e• NJpO YFF J./f nJOOPJ NwiD ndPm NI•In 'C m Nd \• P NPN nnl 'e OJTJ NO lNdNlw> J N n n1 N'.1 .Id YNw Nn r .•IN N n a rv r r ¢• \• N On•• J ..1 J ^1 m ~ ~ u { • O• 2• 7 • / n n n I• 6• Y <O AII1AM _ rNNJNdFmPO NI•IVNdPOPOHNNJN m rNNJN > % NwNNV1 ~INi v1 N'Ni~VN1 .nN M.n nNnN VNJJ^JV„~N ¢/ rF hFnFFFFn nnFFFFFFnFFnFFF FFFFFFnFFFFFnFnFFF •¢• OhnF nFnFnFFF nnFFnFnnFFnnFFnFFFFFFFFhFFFFnFFFnnFFFFFF f • i: I 1 I > 1•• • • •• •• • •••R• > f J O nl • t J P < N V j N I• pdM \ > F > FyN F F N F < NLLtlZd UI m \I.10 FJ•+NO V OJLLw Cq Vul F •PLL P • YJ VJwd U UFO F.f F\ Op PU J N\> v • JY T m 06 d V •¢. ¢ ZWJaiNO +¢ \.•IN j j J Z • VO i0 V V 11•\ dJ O F J O•J VOJO \ J O 11 • VZ V••VO L NOh fi10 wFNf VN p • iNP • ZV N VNV\N yN LrN FVZ6P• 7tl~•10> JZ 21A fhl uZN t J O w„f V~~WMt6 w •4P W14 O•IUO O e •n .• V¢ Z r W JFFNMF f > LLh O\ n Jr ONrw¢S i J N\ NAJ 1¢HVN V 2N0 X¢ • W wGW7h h Jfrl 2VtKw ~J nF i w N2 F • _ _ h OwV VN> •\JO¢ uJ OWr[¢FjWZVZ LL\ V¢ Y .OP U.Yp• w •u ~~ i`:e ° u ° s t ~ 0 ezPPa r r Y PuP oFp~YY o . • s L +.[ H S 2 n • • \OIL ILnwf¢a n ¢ aFn O.IIm2ZSiONVf >•( ~ LO a00 J l J SOY itl ••2 op[i OtF NOU OVYJ6<a J Wi:YnOZYLLW YN LLHVONLLKNF U'J ~'~W J• w\n Y'J 7 ¢OtlNa 9f >2V .] YNF mY G V•- O n 7 w ~ Z • Y Pa fiL N<W FS.JZYN VU<NVO 'n rx<rtl' ~P snhuiorPNfHZn o¢ LL . i YK •Vt • Z N O w26N 1 NOO7< CV U.L; <ZOV M1wYJ N;UOW r0< un WLLr YWJaOrJ uZ •J LZ•¢•L JJ LL2 Z ¢ F nY W 'nt VLLLOZ Oi O L'6.n •LLYfOifN N JV •19 LL c Niwn \4 .nLF •'Lr ]NY ¢¢PPi oN non .°lsr aP.ui fu JKii'¢` Y a ~ U V > wFF2 Nww ZF VJChUOLhYwn 2V nW'n 77n Z• uSr LU 00 ¢O•NJ l•••'•< •nS¢ZL>ZW• OJ4'>Z> Ur" i~ j ~ .'J Vu ~LLV 9 YJOUALLYLL VGTwJ~LLMJYJr>f IJY~~YVNLL~Y fJn .-• N 'l n ¢LO¢ }WZ¢e•rtmli)J¢UOVIYIiNULY¢¢ltt¢aVYLLNiOV••LJ • V S H _ _ n Y N < l 11 • J O f J¢ r < U f ~J u l S J r 'J 1. J S V Y Y V .Lf 'V N ?~tiOF r i z tl n i He o a N Y a z v <p] J y Jw R •N ,Y ' J OF J uvY fiLS Y w0 V V \ON S V• MFO 4 J'LOY 2K I • JV W IY Y a •JS YJ3 a 4N JWJJN F RJUYJIOV LL • • ~ y ~ NTf uRVI ~yL t J LL V • • L QF LL ~ h Y i.uE S OU O Hsi oLL 2 ~ LnY >7LNV •~ NVNLr •'u L4 V ~ NVWJ <VR wN ~ r N / • V I)txIJN F~N• lj •VN Y•( FVY W'n •Jiwp1.` NVV V[6 W J J wV J'Y .J U'LF UM DVNaIYFw'di rNSff NyrF a'•jw>TN • N nV Jr iu' Y< FYW FaN Snl ••••VtthiUh wfYW N > / • L W uL IM O w u i Lw w hZZi H'Y la .NU jLY NY ZI rtL DVt Y O QH'92~Y rYfwa •>~Nw i SVGxYMtO 2hiV W.YnZVa • / N Z Ji •A ¢ •2 h'L9Jt4y N LOO Jf'. •N'Ra2NhZY0 ZJ II : N n •NLLU <h~ JO •(NhaMN J 2 OWOLLLLJ N7 i'O 7'JYFirtn •w• •L• < 9 Y • UfLL V W UOY O W • LWaOJ O'Y Fh J.n Stl lj .l ••WWUn•'i•LhLLOF f N JJ>f WJJG VF••J'n nJJNY JJ •(HipMVJLLZ7V J.+ Ilf OZ• w < h0¢Vf N VNf'YJ i N:LJJJJLN]11a W••O6]na<f fCZY••OOOOOOJ ff 11(aa<aamm.m mrm.R OmmyUUUYUVVVUVVUVVVO] • • /O(• < JF.OJN MMF•••Y VNJO d.pN Ti•1FOT••rmTFVN.4MO JI.IJPONdn PJ /O• •[ J w YrJOd TNTNY.IF NPPNO NOd+JrN O FNFFNFPNn m Y • N O m m}1 OO J + e N ddN mdN .09 rv' F NtiNy NM1N NN N N t W• T p ••I'N p N n I 1 F w nl l•1 N H N F F F F F F N T N 1 Y>• • 2 w SNP uY< J<N ~ I Gf E E :} .: "; E WE V} C• T• ~ \i°~ Y• <} Q• 1 n• ~i 3• 6} • f Y>• } }~} i F O M1: ¢ I V /I O} [~ wll I H O •Z} •_• •V• •O• O: 2 •>: nti mOVPwJNOwOOwOJNP OH ooPNmrN .r e'~o ..PHM1O am.N.H+fmNNN .'o T°.M1ti N ~' N O ~1 n 0 N NONJPnwmmr.00o Omo w mN NM1 •aNPOno~anamomo ro wNaaryn nao ~:i 'm> mn~ay mNmY M1~f ~+a Nn m J a L mlNawmPnHNmJNarmPPHNw1Jn PT NIr1 .I O mPn °'On~N;„°~°~~CrY^.F~NNNN~YR,N~~~NrNr&S.P. N°n~nlPn S,Pn PO°°a oa~~S<S<a wrFM1M1 wM1wwFwM1wwhM1 hl~wFM1M1PFPFhhwFM1M1Frl~rwl`Pf-...Yw OhwwhwF M1f~rww.-M1nhhwM1hFhhnNwwl'•FFPhrywwYMM1I~M1I~f~wl~NwwFM1FMF V Y ~ Y_J fWN 6W~ J„ Vo R J 2 >TpN WNO P Pr O ~ V 2 n Y 2 Y p ¢UN A JIY Jf He ¢ ilY NNf Opr r J 1 w V r i Z ') H ~I w 2 v ) b \ rim aow Im w' .¢.eup NrH LL mloZ[ WVP WO _ JJ7wV020Y\JYY JIK 2 J~LLJmp~~~ ~S JD J= SJ p NZr6 •JH `f Neu n'[z> O~~~Y Hi ~'nNPJrir _V r~1LH 1n1 WW1 `fJJ J p2WM Nwr~ JpOUSSOYOL rA< zN•a CIM fJNaP ZYN IV pOe NSJ U2<l u2x fit rrY¢ JJfJ VSSVYJM I]JWp u~'Jp [Jp¢irHVSY[ YwLrpIJYU AY U1r Yr•a[LY IY> ~[ J Y u< O OH •2 NQLY ~ ~ rJJ ~ ]U PV<~+ JO• p 02) OL9H HN PQ;J wig HW J2 ON YN VV upJJffl`O. ~n _ Ye[ _ •h V6YJ J aJttO U YNNr2j9VNLSJM NfwK '17 w HCLL V~JFr +f<Y <V a<t V a9uiY<L Yioe Ol¢N i6wYV aLLLfJV W~~ f]W<r1 V IpH~J Ow >ry VL Y Np16 <i^INV7 VV~Ni• ¢1¢ \ fV • rf l.uf 2.}•I'f li/ff V¢w>f NiYNOa'Pf< N 6 JJN PNOO w070ULyrtt Vf w IfJW )>ZpYYNVUYN'IWJwRiOm3Y> f\W W'YYVOOy<V J'O YIWOp00¢ pOD0000000WWWLLIWLLLLLLVVOV fa PT f • Zf P P i N T POP N • V 7 \ 2 • P Y N ¢ P f P f OIhY .f 2 J \m\K\ f V_~_ N p ~n Jf Jfd V i fJf HJ f >N>7> NV O .w U p o Ur Wp rY.- iV-120 KHr YUI NJNIN wt IU JO Y IyJ \ w<WN J 2 N u .il .u uY< Yzr WN::~° Novo u o~.u. r MNif NJO TD O LL L X19 HV W NL2 p'J DY• ul 1 VZ Wa I Nrni ~ HYJ N Z Y J WOWIt ¢wwt0<mHM1¢ PNpN NOVL OZNS[PKtt r7uwr W P02Of ~]LtfVJil-L>f OZHZ¢2NVp2~u~ 6KSnLaJKJJ IS 1 J 91-JWHZ ZD rfuwTW.-Idw .p a =yJ Url¢t You iJ Tw^a7N)Ypnona ~rvp2 ¢1.. .7NV< .-'VNr1YaVJVY 1< OOV aOw M1„• rdiN LLLL >< w 1 ~.l J2 J J J Y J [ w H J O ~ ~ F F ~ ] 2O n N D J Y rJY Y(Y K J JY • riVO Z u <J fuH C ~ I l ~ O. f- In L92 OiNVh 61.. O V V N¢~ J<L KJ:¢ JL O p b w L ~ J J Y W Y V Y •IY VUVWS nJ H3JU uY YJLYO JOIS • ~YN •00[YKJJpNfUeo 10 1 I N .rO i'u L ui. l-4 V~i00iW6fa01NYV~pL¢OY•~.w 1 YuVU2JNO>UOJUp2wlunli 0[V>uL V LLLHHH'11Y Y1(YJJJJJ 1 Yu Y J I' VY L [ NNNNNPJJmOmPNVP'f•mw'n~U M1amwwmON•r'O QNP:HVJm~yHmn1T a0 N ^0~=mmNJ'N N^mNNNP<• ~ NJRnPNN• 9M1NNmONFmF /~(~ M1rNP M1~h'tlN<NFNY mHP1 HPmP T.IJPm .y ltl P'I r0~ TwNnP `/~ E ~: • ~~ ,eq maroe N ° m e~i• . ago a.+ ni. n Yeer ocr i ~: eOrrua Nyrn Y.I rr~0a NnP n ° f N i NNN r.m a.. . rN nar .i e- m m a c ry.Y m.; ..r m mN N rc• \• J m r NN n rv w • • n n Jti ar>pOrNmJ~n •'O rN~m myN ^an"loa.N000O<n^<a~~amoa.^om<.^•<E.y 3oSE<oya oaa~ ~RB$`o ae<o I-rl,.rr«rrl.rrrrr..Nrr nr n .-r n r ~n ~ or..I.rrl-....rrr rl-I-.-rrrM1M1nnr.rrrrrrrrrrnl-r-rr. rr- rr r. rl -I - r ii • Y 1 Y f f ' ' l• • q 2 • L LN J V G myP NW J n Z \ • • I. 9 J V w •n ~Zy mJ Y <F KIM1 M1 T ,d; Za Om wir/r •V OJU • rm LL . f N LLOm •m M1 NV JfJ J O W> iN •wN Z WZP f><2'O YNP O7i• JOYO >ON q ' V G < •flil i i F zae rcoy i ' i>r ` ~ i ~ fy 1 r e w a iP yzN N< nrm:. V61 Z J WT WLLW Nfw ')S} ~ LW NV NU> LL6 r LL Z O SfJ I r OYr6NM J6 ' KVi alr] J Irc VZ]OIWWJw .uJ> NWJ<•s Yiy NJ w\.7 ;Z• 1 NMIG ,-rJRrNYIUOVNOIOF>Y OpOtnfz V m eel m u.J •O/ >LO O[• N60 6 GN VL r u Kl f:JO Y/ J O~Z OLL H<6 uLLGml- OSyd 'l10`>,[ VtN NWJIOZ O i orrl24 n +[UmY r'J d U/ .uJIJ VHrY~ •OZw Z Q \ 7r rc 1~/ OWW NNSrr J.SNf JM iIU I-f LSwy Jw iruUYN]wLY SOLY OVOfYrrcVZFRx SLR V NIr.O_ J U/ is I iy ]ZgNfrcY< <2ftUWZ LFNPORWVI.FP N ~ N N/ NS/- J')1Y • mi aZJiJ LI-IM1>N >1- N S rL io: HiJ 4i i%>o°.~i.J. JIUM1 iris sil r°-uan •o~i i M ~n~ Y ~ ° ' ~H ~ r r W i i y )Lf.-N ~r .LLnrH . c. er rz2> nu ' ~oi n z < r•.v agzz rcl ..zin JI]ooNgw• M1' • • ~Il H L '1YV+']Y rl-I.IL7r nTLL UrLr ~p Yrurc u 4 a 0 S} Y.1 ± r WF.r O'4h2du f •I 0< ryettt LLe. i J•JJSLL• O>YnaVn.nV NOU4Nrcl[YJOON•K 0 ~IIY l10• dV l J Q 2 i NJ d i J e s L f V > J x Y'u i .< OY i J ~j 7 1 J V 2. < 1 iy z i -~ n 6a rJ Jan NOVI Of n~ i Z i Y JY V A • , W j YrJ2 r YVr ./I rVN J J~ wNi ZY r M1 r • 7 2 f J.] N OH ]~V ; En <~]N Nfx '{SY S'l Y•u ~6qU rcrur .] n O'u 4] rlY ~') ~-I~O~Cr ]< Yp) _ VrV J2 Nif U LL> V Vl V W Ni J ^ 'a L r JnrwWC;¢JSN .f ')UY JVd MJy JVN JJ<Y f nM1 r • f Q L,OJZVV •-JJfUr[ Nary OV •OU< iiu J f a L i 1 J J y V u 2 r J U L f J O ,y t.. Y Y W 2 V y YNrJUu > p'NS =rY2\ Sx .VJJWHJ ae 2 SO Hi NrJWWJ •J YlJ J + • • I F u=6 4FNC 09pM71 'L >Oi rY\ CNLOZMiWJ9ruuSMF4 ? LL u • • •Z• rcQ fMMM1] U2 H1.. 61- ]art r=J i'DWYI NIL y900YU O 9Y06pHFVSO VUrtOf M.]fVLV JOOY>NNtSOWi<M~ B Z .: ?JggZi •f• UVrrI Iy00 =ffHpJZiffYtHYUJ «WW~u H(lJ\f iHry ZSO ] 21 ZLZiiZS2 22SYOOV66GL66p•JZ.YYgSgY N1;6NNNNNNNNa N~NNn N+ r = ' Y'• gTN090rCMNpNNaJPNNNaOL myrl•aa TOf Orn rT •O• NNpNYOr N~Immf90NnPNPhfNaP} NNP TTryrgOmNOr mONJ L yA~NmJNfmVNVAAONO mf am N VP mmPm y nL y. :Z: ~Am NA MrPPT N „INp fI 9M01 N Art el 0 m.V .r HrO ^e y {./[,r •>1 V_ V O m `NP d ~fN ul Gf ZLLO fnJ LL c :E ,E wE ' ., . _. :_: :: ~i iii n f ~ J~ Y~2Z ai ~l• ~2 •OII • '~ • K 11 ~ ^ .n, •i~ ~Y ~ Y I M •V IZ~ ~ f ~ •i• ~ ~ •K~ •e• •e• •Y• •W• a~o~m~.m ~a:~ava~~.Y~~emm~ dmr+.. +•eYNre Y • V N YV4UW.np OOO<OOWNO nrrrrnYr~iro- O rrrnnnrnnrhrrrrrn Y 4 Sf Nf u °m i w a a Jp u°. z u u..vi p o a ..a v .+ mr s °z J Z 40 nA YY Z i J f N VVrV_ 40 N 0= ~ Y JVI YN K LLYZ YO O K OJnNFM OW O ~R YINZPp NS 2 OZ 0rm •O.pf nW rLL NO ~SOrT.T I'J oa eiNYOr~woa 2f Mr4N 1 7Y.n 06JO '.J6 2 •2K wm wOn NLKYSNI6•NfWJ2QV JIW sa YOYW ap'1 JJ7 ~~r im.n~i~~ioKy4~~~ LL o Yf j W LL J J;~ W J [1V ti Z a0•niLLUptNVr"I4 Jn.]Y J • V .16 O N K rK H e JVJ VNK ~ 6 ~rJ 'J Y:Y V Y e W Y p r ~ t ZJ KZpV Lp YN V u0. S Wln tO ViLepi VUJ a6Lr Y'uwZV OJ2Y~l •Y <rf ~~~p NOV pOfUYJI J•nL 6a Z~[JNV -e'/~I Zar mV Y4VYYJNOV •r yF.J .V JJaZf S1GfYNV~N~N'LLO O[JZVtaWJZa~ NYMrJY ffC•u0e6pYf W;SMUW .rrnrrr~saas aaa~ dOmtiPINQNmNdYI19JT ~rm~Y00mNYnmdfNmO imNMm~+TNmaNmn I1 4 E E r, ~ : ;; i i r mm P Fao N ° 0o emm i enN oi M1NNONOOVJ N nF rp ONm J nr rrr~m r aJ N n NH v rH mr- \• m N N F r Wt •• ~ ~ 7• ^ N A n A wp iROi1i iii JO N NaFmPm•rrv M<NWFTPpnNmJN ry/I JN F9 PCrNm.I NaF ~ ;po ema o aaa °r°~r°.°rr°.~~tin~~C~rH.H i¢~ FFFFFFFFwFnrFFH nl-r •¢• OF HFrFFnM1 FFFFFFFFnFFFFYFFFFhFFFFFFFFFh FFFFh FFFFFFFFF •<• •Z• U 1 1 < > < < ! ! 1>! 1 ! i J¢ Fm \ f\J NO _ i\ WtNnW WrJ w ~~ p Z ~ ~ 2 V 20v •OwrY !h pN ¢ 6WS16 p 6¢ SN 1 iw W\ p p p vZ¢¢V •Ha> LA l• 11 uFV 2 pg ¢HP 6pr V0 WV niH tn ~ LL JY.LL¢ O NJF! ZVpYm WSJ Zp'¢F6 S KU< 2wr\ ¢p6 P2w IT> U7w ¢J1 Fpw ~ I D pWw Nqu2J ¢1 q J 70 NOM YI ¢ LLYq i~0 JWh2 r J•OFw FZO <2Hr mS~FrLWwYr V'y2WZF ! Ww VOO Vw WW Ya 6ZLL2u1 IH Jpp qp H<¢N p¢JY¢V u S i ~ wVV LLJ Om 4 Y ppWF u2r J< OJHr2O20 u JNN {Sn C n2 2U7 NOwNe OSNwV_O t•' r2203FNh2UZUFONO Z6 2LK N Z wJJ J\ u0 r V rrJUin 02NNiH2 2Y¢Y tY2 2 Uw0 JVL 2p LLN ~ ~ Y fVH V TSLL ¢JJ3<J~u OJmFJ<JZLL i r 00 ~ <mm q2<> NL J ni hLrNW mO OpoLON 9< Oi<FH 0 o " OFF Fnl-LLOSOZw 1 yZ zIN sze0 N o;oW m s r i ul;<L V.Nn! rur F H LL l .q• a r <J pJiZ UJOJVpVO¢;LL tUJ 6Qq JNF NJf w u JVNLm OSVNf NYwVn O ~;• rJ;¢ H9Yr tJt¢NwNr _ ii<O> iN~ Lm0 mJn.;Yw'J6 h1 O u yHFJ p2wJY ¢ i1.[<~F .u 4 2 ¢a p J~;WWJ •~N •~'Um p tj ~ SJZN YYO a gpuNn 6> g ~ LL>p < IX>pw IX f rpa< iV <a< ~ ~ oiip; p O J z< Y H i ii o 0 z ~ i Y ~ roa w iu ~H / h JNpU Z v S Y JVN • 2 2• H O YZ 2> J f O p SU N { ri ~ Yp U K hNVi ~ ~ V p unn~q ••u Z 6U S¢ Z W O ON W r, YO t Z H K H ~ u 1 F VF <2 w • O p2 prr J¢ i V}> i IwKY• N2 rPHV ~ ? tn¢00 •u t~eJ7YJwyUwf ururtV Ja¢ ZO Y ~ u VU YO pJON NLYZVW¢Gn <O x N<P r UWt F i U J __ WOLLYFnN<H W2N1 Y <O ¢2 MV S __ _ ° Jr¢< JQah<H aVV w WWLL< U •wVq •Sp<VN < ONOpN Wh • WqV rY SLL OVJ J Y q Hq Y¢ O L YLWiL ']iOi VLM p N~ Z• 2 Z ¢W ¢Y h O• ¢NNr ~ •wll qpf< V f<JM~2 YW7¢N •VFNW VH¢ VOf O<J¢ wF HO Rr[OFi ~ _ p7 pOp `N• • O¢ w URh ~;~ U6VV FOHWWFymJFVY JOJp2¢IiNiri ;¢¢ N~ U~prVW mVJJIZS¢¢r~« wLLJJO YO OOp 'JfWWYHHY9 2• < SV;q< m<1f « fggY« <000m0m9UVVUVVVVU VVV Vp0000000 •¢• a aaNa'O JHNNmNNNnNVVaOFFNFOJJ aNP FVN OaH NmrvFnPfNO 10• V FJ• U mmmMNNPNrvmMmNHmVmO mmFF a Y NP ONp NM1 Om •a• a maa ° m rN am NumNNNNN2 r N n y ^ m N P ° ~w• n P Pmm N mF.r n FNYmryFrFmN rvmm F .. m nm ~~ N m N ia• ;~ mMO m.Nmo~m ooe ~ ~ao~e~ E=E eAO a •f. 'oceeiu mv; .+ .vary ~>e ~ m .O r1Tr PO ONN NJY N r .n v a r N .~ rr f rr m.n n \IY/ r r r O 1 f II N .. •I• ~ < J• ¢YOY nLFm M.I 'N ghmT Nghm mPOr ~ • !JR Vr! •NNN NFq nnnrnhrrtiv M1hNM1FM1 YNM1YFnhM1nM1nM1 Oi >~n.hnFF.-ri-M1M1hNNFNM1FnYnhI.NhNNh NI-FYN.~Ynnh nl-rNFPhNNnNh f . . . . . 1 • . . • L M • • UN h A TM J PP \ Y \ \ \ 1 n •J .O\ p •00 • A n ; h. amn \ z n pia aw .. i ..P ~ ~ a ~ m\\ ir N i i N N N .. , mNN h J .z. . W~ m° °p Yia n _ n ww nn W oo W n INP ~.\i2F \ 2 p6 \\ h0 y \ VZ^ ¢02 ;n l NNN l RW S w 1 N 1 V V ~ 1 Ofo Z l . . . I rtIL 2aW^IJh 1-J J¢ LJN LWwM1 V V¢1 tlZp2UZ< U mV QO uLp ZN w W\w ¢VW W I pp p J l JJpr7 I wOJ ~NrSJ uSW ~ I W V W I w2J ~`.YZ»a 1 W Y2• 12w1JW LLN N..ULL aJOUma U' pILLO 1 w22 pry ¢I~ u0 7Y Y2rP pLL6Wa p02 wp LLhV Y 00 6SwWa OJOJY'Y 91LN10 LLODON <V mrmW.[ V270602 ON2 Z.. irr .+m of VSVhN r N 1 p• 70026 UN6 JYf ihQ NZ rLf OJMNOVVI ¢OWNVN<a9 JM Vln J vl0 YOIW J aJJJJw u<T OJ2Z 2JrJVJZ wfJ adM OGiVOOJOpm WOF02 mOUYLLLLa JZJ 22N a a r a 2 r .w20WOVLif >tl0 OV JN <NNY Nh 0 ply pO m w l J u pl VJY uia S J O N J V' J M1 V f .L tl V J .- +[ M O a N J V p ~. . V O J M1 h W V Y N V w .Y V aVfJ NYN2W.~N wNVJip h2d Npm ¢LLJw J 1-O I2I >'Y YZr¢ZOO>20 wLY ~+LLL V p JW gYJw6 TYf ~u{1'O YJJJ<NWrw~JYW urY Nf J'~62 t ¢r~s~.lad.pNf NpNYVfPIdr-.dOp'.p 2NO 0<6u Of VirN6w<I..f6NOi0 ~ • V • 2 / S V Y r tl N Y 2 v V Y O J = NVN n Y di •S p W 2 r ~ MZC . YO p • N Y vOVLOY 2 Or Ur y 11 Vtl V VF NJ S 2~ 2 • 1 Y NJ• 2r Y NR r2 62<F NJF ZZ WLLhFO • NOF KU J¢V pn 0 11 • wUi JN ZV fi YJ JYN WUNLL2 ¢2f K iw a7 tv1V pf V Y aif a2 ui00ip JOaUV ¢20wyJOSS02Y•¢WOJii< ~ ' U II lf <piw~10ULLV O ¢Z Q6S fl J 2N • SV r2N JJN Y'I ..¢ VVpU uOWaL 1U• JwV• MJ OYOLL ¢..W• J6 ¢YSd2 Y i> JO N2 .12WNVJJO• • NY20pJJY. •f M11 •ZJ2N NI Y20af YVZ <Sr262 f<2 N 1 .[.{SYNZr <fW2VwwOf WNWL 20NNW •ZLNL14bOVOaf2 rJ W• •i• OSOVZV«VLJ nNL>W a2J 2NNNSVN.'.w O V_V_h_U_V_W.[1-wVVOWIO <..~ Ldr¢¢<Wmaaf J2Za< WOJONOiLNJOVSi3>O laah >VOpF` •f1 iNY00aa<ffNrv00¢aY00Yw2wV<JZOOfW OOO7Y>ffffVVwWYYf .[ •2• wwWLLLLLLLVVNUVOVU'DVU'SZSrrll.[.L .L ~[fJJJJJJJJJiLLLiLLLIL2E • • ± •a• P+Id mryP'IFtm rmM1V NPgnNPPmtlNPPmNNOmOOq<f mN1~NmNmN O• Y OfPgNOff wOP NMP W.IJ mNhNMVI"h.. 'YnNOr rtlT h.•m Om'9 JN.. g9bm O Nam Nam m.pm gPrh.Yr NJ m r ~ •2• Nr P N P M1Nwlry rNPM11 .'. w1P/IPP II' P Pm Irv P PPNwNNNP1 N1n •4• Y>1 i u :NP Fy uao ¢ O Ll eae o e~a oao A V p n V M1 N O .c NN~ 0a~ m E_: o~¢• \1¢\ a.( iii Nwma maN Nawm wNm 2Fm _ nFw wwwww wh1- owwwwr.w.-wrwnwwwwwr-wrwr-wr-wwrr-r wwwrn~r-err nr=~rw-r=nn nr-. i of zi ¢~z~ ii i i i II •St iK 1V •L• sP ) \ 2 i am ors um a\ msw ~+op ur;=aVLLO W\v\Sti w¢ l0° •NZN o ~NZrN VI> >1 NJNwa ~> „I ¢1 i0 \i6 mVmoOVLL rJ \~1 \ .K ~Nn 02 ¢¢ YY uiT O~2 ~4< ~Zp i2J Yi6 u0¢ ¢Z wO F' LLO V' VOp m~vvi0o mir' ¢2nr pNW UJNLLVYV OLO >J• WJ3 wO.n WZVfN O~LV OJ LLJVrO.ON¢2FVrIwSJrp2rm JS ¢Ow pp W~'.N9aZ~iZOOLL OI =FUT6w jVwu ru[0 r0 VNVOw NLN >20 NOJ2J •OIY LOw ~2Wwwwr Niv ZPl ).rf0> u\J16o rJO7if'.fi wJ0 wi+ 6¢NaUO~av1V ~V66NJNY 7mpNn Jrpn .Pi N J Z ¢' J K V 2 O o n J Out we » rLL.ra Z U< 'zap N~JU iso rVJ ¢>v aW vN JLJV JJ> UJ NNSgY9N YLJ+Sa VxwVVVV O7rJ7gi2N Kw2JVWLLUJJ vV SVVWN pJp •>u 1VW v\y_ rN0 NZUJZi~ VO W¢VM vuOKN2 ¢OWWrwtNJv pr9 WwVNUiw yrpmvJu ¢22Fq LL\1 LLOOOiu JCw2¢U J 2¢o0¢viKO7'Y YLLSt222Vf v¢Z wLVi00RKfe(fgVWWViO 2006GGYpGLGGpY4n¢¢NNNNNNNNN r lsw w m ,- ~ p moN z u .Nr °` V \rrJIOM Ju V O\i02 \ vS ayOV =Y ¢ O PN O 1 r+ Nwl~w oIM1 G rw+i Ju LF iaoOr .viSUV LLN Yp O Jf¢Y ¢V>J> ~J JJ • 1~¢iPOJ OJ SJ wVO•.LN! z~NMNi l J9W¢• • >O+J l wLPO vZw/ 41LL N wrtlYrc+w OrraPW wUhYOL Nwwgw ru l¢N na¢ N`aJm OVLL wi vY uJLNrHNrNrJWw2~6J21J 2JVlv1 NJYwVOJl6~ O Nm1~Vim4ViW2N~Z<rK~ vOi v u C V_ O F N¢ ¢ wTV 1-OttW FU VJ 7Z LLS• OJpVrf SN WVl O¢pru+0 >2 oHii.aWZni ¢au °a w.i.u ¢p Nl :IJ 20meNly OJi.i2ZFY NLVi~»2Y •fw~¢KJV UON lNOw3>LLUWWYO pV 2z urnv .wHWwuNi~WYZio ¢a¢ YN=Jf _N fny~ __ YWr[ •m ¢WW OL m¢\>OiW¢ 2 m ~7(wi¢iN2N1[¢wvNNVM¢aO~l NNNNNFH,f>)iiiLiilNN maNamary+wPN r•ra+.rae N'o nr-a NwaoPwPmwmNmwmaNmNPm +NmNMOwaawIPNNMa• NmmNNY BYO-~PNONw~ONwa NrymmaNaNONN mlrlmm wNPPNNPVImNmPNmNO Nr4 w mlrl .am•~ NN NTNmNmNm •1 ti rymmN mmm m vm N 1'~ ~ ~ I •i~ lI •ZI ;s .¢r •O~ •S~ •w• aF °~ VSO i l V V LL u+ •L• ~• ¢•O• ¢i •f •r 1 1 ~ po n eeo~<Nn°ee me aeoooolen .mnP ron PNN F.ImPmm O~nNNmNrwNNrOm.~N+••F+~wrOFFFNFO r ON ewPNNPr+OrN NNNN+ OemOF mn•m NN N N N N a aaPrmrr rF••r amm nNN mm~Nm nLLn n JJn NeFmPOrNN+NOnOPOrNP! ^m"aia~smieammmmmemmmmm~m~~me~~mme:m:~moe:mm:m FhnhnFn'nFwnnwnnnFrnnhnhhhhnhrnwnhnhnnFrF mnrhnhnF~nnhnnnFr hhnhnhnhwFwwnnnnnhhwhwFnrwrnFnnF F.- If I> le ft U w+ mYr• >hN fp Jie i Of _V PNOmF nl J I+O VO O~ f0¢ONNO:T Ph Oe n,n mUn nw> >Nw w.p SJ•\NNPVN O+P >J >\L_ V+V.V OZ Vfr 2> IVmI• ¢N JhV mr Lv NOV f\ ¢2 •fIJO JZ••m • fp ±i V VZVC ~V• 'JU 1+0 Pr aU2••J• ONJ¢ C F~VJ ••m •Uin Jnwnr i+V J i •Jr IpeLLJJViN JSOw J\• P O IJ W•• ¢9\ O p w WO¢ • i_ V • • ••N Vf • ~n¢V w r iV_ _'a NV_YI ~L O hOWOjr:O r G r•2 HNr7 S r V < ••OOOn h~sr0 J[Nf V o N P wy iaz Fiam¢rofpeew mz'J NWWWLLfm J NW WNy wo~z~ oritl• Ni:lon e• w ~'~. •.r N z»yhLLLLi wWN:LLiowJr„f .z. ". e i •. r heWnah~W~meazr oo y hW oazsyx ex: > oz » i•z _ LWtliW z u~Nrrr:wzuW Pv V OV M1Otl J•+FLL F O~OZhNNi`•N1. aNZ w V> S _ J4• > W21 Sf ¢•• fSOW f_a ZJ• e ifa> swJ i or°sihWwJe :LLJwr¢u N>'Nw~L u + O> fV ¢NN `Of20 Wm:iiU:W OV' J r¢O •- w U Of >J J¢W2MJF'w WfaNOOLL•f ~IOWO OfwfOWlnVUwJa 10 2 OV VU>O¢V••V6J40' W 6 iZS >SCrWtlUV~•Si•¢rJV O LLL JM •1 O••W••O••V O¢ ••WW¢P¢O•• •••09eMh•9MNwOLLrr Oi4w >s sWC¢hswLLebwoJ¢2wwWWJ fuuW im zwWx i w: a.zl~uo:sasiu io» ii °a•N>N v~o¢Ww > > ¢U >rm> OOVO rvOVYN CiNF VV¢> •+ ~ e s o iium o u •. z rVWf •S N ~ O J¢•VIV Z YON ~ J i •. 's z ~eYrc .n .no 0 Mf W 7 J LLbN• 2• q VY N h VW U WyN J6 ViStl•yi •Vi •ViV • •• N_n f y f ZhN•u2 NSU.j Ot h NiiW J• NUW• ¢ NV> Yitl>SI] 20 NNS >V • V4 h i fi ¢ •O Onl 00 V•fWNi00W 2W NO hOhh Va N tOY2rVVV••'Jma 6`ihNN l>SNMaNWyN06 Ni V a •JY¢mt ¢r tl¢]StiM¢rWRiWi J2V JNO~hrY O +f+iJJVYih\NrSNnV••¢fhn Oh l IN 09 f< ¢W N ZUI•I nl U~ V\ON <L7NZh'li NVi i l WV ¢=•.NY •SW 22¢•• • i •ph l•O •> „1 • •O W YI •QyNZNOY>¢ f OJp LLSj¢ fVN •(OW{Y. •tf > ei NO U ZOOSZSJ•ZNO• f• Jf 2Y ONOJN O J ¢ 02 <f IV¢y WV¢ WIL Y.p„ON¢V9 ¢O\W2i~WOtl•lf YY Q Y•• ¢QWOOOWJ •Y. [ NhnifYS N•[JN •N+n •OS i CJ hpNhN» ¢¢OJJJ¢6¢NS nhV20>3JZLLf6iUJf 1t > N [ •O tl• fr~jV~gpyVyVyVVVVUVVVJUJUVVV000e000LLLLLLU P POe +r O+P+nNNnlnypeaP•• NNeOm•IP ++NPPNNNPNINON•• + NlmNNPPaa Pa+~+•N Nna++NneaeeeP+eP < + PP N NNNmN»mp+n00+ a m mm m ry N m hnmm+nnnw m ewn rwm N Nn 8 pl 1i0 LLO 00 E ~; i` o~P <r~ ors rr i .~ of ei ~Z~ 1 1 ~:• •S1 :Y• O• •~• :w. aONOOpNPONNr•IO NOONrONNONrOOern000NPOn ein monaNaenr-pef enonoe..or.Pe e..e eN.rP OI-nn~a r;o e..m e.-~o~n .oo~e.~ .~o~~-oo~~n N.e NewrNSNNaaaa r:enn °a NePaee one N. of san .. n r r Nr N .~ .. ar. n.wpoypp~YNYn Ca ON ar-Cf wernnaN a~-.PernnaNar.wprNnJ~.. e3~~S~e~s~i~p1'P RPpSRPSIP>ParpPPPPOPPPPPPP~X aPP}Tr r^PhMMFNNNNNNFh rI.MNNPMNNNNhNNhhn ONNhNhNhNNNNnhrhrnnrn NNhN1•.NhMPNNPhNhhrnrNhhNNrhNrhr V fPf• f iL Lf . •L LS i jLfff Lf ~ n mN O if Na V P ryw . _ O J IIa PP h fh f L f O •a S NOW i Nla r F2 J .Sa •a MfY i N f W 1 1 N NN rNr O .f _ 2L h J f NYO VW O hr ~` NVN IN6J PS iN f VU 6N rOh f~N N;ti OV Y H LY ~UOOaWJn Sli OP Fi N SIJ VJ h_II J SLrWPe LYr yyW~WfWON WO UhW J^ ~~Y1 w_ w=lry\N,ry WYr~ VIV WOOrV ~ _ __wFw O s Lrry Oy JNVJ IPi Y OOJi O Y J P pLNVr I 1\6r NIVI •V Lf~. \l YNpOLa 9WfVL 90LiWr w0~0>fwOfDlOrl 'JJ• nw LJYL7WhLU\ » \OLi~\Vfa~2 NN'J'f lNlihN„> L ywh O MwNOry\ZN Y fW rr N 02 h20 L2 YiNN Sf >WV 6J •\ wZVL IWWVLW WOOhO JrNNWNVFPy JF_ONWpSa O rwVYi UiYZUYL ySUSriZi ZWf\V YSwi\w f •Fr JnJ 6iYfiOWU2riWSiW i\\WhONi hfJJiZWWNfWrt w r O PW MOOfN •fnfhhiLrY n S VVf Oi ui00aJhvP> fiVpNiWYPnhWWP VW i i>;e~< w~ pf `fr rJrWWLS WFrOWYipW70fYfOJPNSVOYp J•uf Pf vl,wyfJTW J NVNhnN NPYNfhW FOOLV7iYrY fiihUYLO ih•4NrLtirN• \SO IOrOiiM h~2WOiliirSOOf NOWr iWW99irLiLiwilW>PV1 hV Vi nLZLMryt~Sr W> fOWOfiWwe+OJWLri w NYW V>O~OYJ aOSp~trViilOfiNJ~~UYONVMaZL'l;fYi>OO~yLL~~NOm~~rid[L N L J O f i Z L V Of iW 7NU 9W N fN OWi fa N Y irr O Zf L h VN !W V u JN iw 1 V •rV S yj P 'JJ WUr ZL Lr•1 fN V O• J ry\ ~W LZ Z f0 U N s M ruZ yyfVU JY P zJNiW un nn OY NUrV Ji O VZ i ryJW OJ JJU rhW wNi• • fhNN Y 9 Wf ur •OfaYVUY W aY~OZ~~ LO nyNi i>Ul VN NtU fiJ OOLNfOJY ihhwryhwPWiryLOSiJV USOYryY10 WW• Wr WprW• ;NVJJNP\YY LYVLPifONLP •f JrVriJ 6L0 T>Wi w "QUf Yi •t LirWNNWhwLi~n`:jJ riJOi YNNYf • Vi •f wrrNOLW. OOr WLJLIJWY .J O YWV~JNf i>Wte>fe3lLYOYY V_h_J f ZYN JJ• ff iefY Y W=OWJWMiMONLYINO LWY Y W Y OVJ Wf0 tVNWJ>f• L O trf N1 IW VyVJJ Yi OOY ONr O JZ SiONf it it• OVN LIJLi ~• fiIfJOJVY FO>hVL fWNN=JIh000V0 OYiWW Z •V iW OfZZf>tiWNOJrW JW OVM JO• ON tifN WNO~J :JNf if •y'Yy0> ~OjrOfY VO'YiMOWtO ptO ~f1W=MT>ONV)VV iFt• •f• ~ P VFi, MWt LWh WMOJ JONYpOJJJh OL i=WWiNJNiNyniYY. ~fhMWfel JUVVwLY00 OOP;iSiiOiOff OO •frVN n0000fIrOJZZZ ff aWWii VSLZZLSrrryry nfYJ~JJJJJItii[t iiiittzZ20000LLLLLLLLL OlrNea=NnNOfOJPNOPQ=NNrOPO_ nNNNNPNMNOMwNen.Na T nPNpneP• N ONrNnY Nh N':• OarPTOweOrnOPNNPNIO ONPNrf O npNT.V h^f.f.^Yfehn NN=wfsOrmP^ P r nNrPNrNT PN rP nN PP Pnn /lrrr M 9 VEQ ~ 1 ul S ~ DPwD _m~ewNN.aN NeaeDDNP.NPmwm.eDmNOm~mmmNN_ N mrvooNaPnNN PwPr nm. Nn n~N m N .. ..N .a. N:[ary°IV U•°•~mnmPm maNN .. :_: 'aN ^ Nai-mwc al-mPm.N-. .rN<.-mwoNNn~Na...we aaaaaaaaawaaaaaRaaaaa;s;ara;rTaaPaP nrnnl-r-r nnr~-n nl. nr_n nl. ni-.....1..- D~nNrrNNrrnNr~.NNnNro-rrni-n~~-NNwnNnla sNS Yl-rl-1-~~- . . • . 1. .. .. .. aL zo i Ja w u ep : o i nJ r °ee i J _ or D r D [a \N~ i 1 pP V O YvN F 'OD CNV NT I NV WZ. JO Z f ~[vV V 20 JVV'aLV~2a JPS UVfYUV s OUm V\m 6.~.Re N J ONmJLmN 1~ P2 NS. y S~ V['m ~ N Hm NOaWJ00 JNNLL m0wD00 ~ n ~ NSM SVLLOa 1 IP OJ10>OOiUDO p~j x.".>i 'i.°.:. a"'mcNNO 'o~;N..N~f ~ a~NN f •u0> OPUJ IwN2V, Ym WO _ _ Oj VO YWmIm2u2 Nm m'SFnY2YJORUJW ON•u O ' VV1< uLLi2 V JSUF W wiNUNWnmON OILUONLWNO SOUi• tla°:fw ui >Z>Ny.O mYWWM i LLtiSVNf~OLf nUdf>OVUJ2im YOY Y7S fOwN VNU HZ ry000 YJO iONN OYWM1 ``VJm _.OPJO' wY •2fOJYLLWNWYNNW^NN22pOOVV PiN P~JaOY M~J> Wi:mOmOJU2it ~YJJF:~~rf ZN^Yw Pm r SONN[O NN006 ONH SmONFUVLL VNi Zi [o[ [N [;[ f00 WVV ZJf •i: W Sw G NfNry r ~ i u ~ JN N LN>WHY~OW 1f wf UNFN~N.V YJW OONN ~VNnN u'JO iiJ DCmOwJ 'DUN Ui06 DyiY is.L >°z o2N~wJN °SJW OSSJIe ~+O a OYVSiJ inn4 munmmmYNNN ZN U NY D Z 2 7 . O w `~ o r fw LLLf °0 0 0 Yf OON 2N O U O[W rV aY NV VN ZN' LLwNO1LLL f02 :W¢ J 9NVf VVSNOYY OWrWiV wO:V V~OYLVLN NOL20YVWW03. f O GOF JNSO JNY L rtVY yyWZ fo- YY a ~a..e O:WW N m .SY OVOZ N. YMrO i. i FUZJSYJ>VVi6N~FOymr « FYNLLOLi awwptFJmYYi6GJNLL6YNNNN[.J NNNNNNHNffff~OY~ff~lfl)1)VNN NPm•n alNn OQaNN^NPNNpUwn NPw.~.y TINPNm• r /iP NN U•VPP •nPPeNnN/IOFPPTn Nna N Mm N mD H NmDm N mmnrNm.+NOTNmN N i [ [S [w 10 ~SSK~', F I ., _ m .. ~ _ .. '~ i'~ :%` ~ k C e £- _ „p A R . N6 xs 66 ui ~ na_w'~ - _ ^~ ~i ae€ __ $ is': _ e e ~ e`s 3<a Y &5.~8[ ' ~ Yom' . YyC~ w r~k 1~ 8 R S ~E i°e ,-• i R?:x f~y~ ~-?{{>' e 53~ ~Y~Y :s°2'a i~~}~ `eE ~9 Y" ~: Yf9'~S i-'~ ~~'~9 ¢aa~s ~e°~c .'S ~.a -s~d3 k V` I ~~ 'r 11 - _ecamse_sq?aqa~#iis~a%n s _" - aama ~ -.:^SFCRC F. ~.°~~FFFFRS«Ydi£ m o S ~ 5 - #sd r.mF#~s#sxx##£sa°.s s~#~^ ~ _„ "s a?~a m ~~r-~' #sa£~r: ~#s#A?S#######k:.es '~ ss - #§sk m 88888888888R8888888fiYfi8 R FR C 53 R•°. L -• PasFS °s~a,sxsh #,s sRassaFasR a rz"_ ° 'sr-r s 8888,8R88888888R88R888R8. ZYe°.~. - s s; 3css$ss~4~9~&S$ssggg~ssS ~ 3~ ? 's,~¢~ r ~~.; ~':~ ecHSSR#$#€aa~gaasaaR~,~&°s 5 s= = 3k^"n 6 48 e8R88F88888888?288FRC88'.+' c£. `~ :i.^~ R _€ ('~ ca s~i~s€ssas#€r g.?fs#t.S Fsss E ~= = ea^:= E „ie ... ' ,•ess•a ee sea.arv>raaa;>:.~ a aw" _ .*"- ., ~,, .v ~. ,, ,,e :.,en-?zz:.,-.?s2„ rice ~6 x ' g~~~v~w we~tw~~r i~'~r~wwvww'v v~ ~ W~~ ~ 3m~~g Y s~~°$!?~5~~~sama s: 3:~aonnY~,~. 6yH ' e~~l xg °s _ ~- a ~ a .~. `i .a' ~ .. „ s w°~s~. s^-#P,tII$L5~$z$Rg.~£#$'~~"i K~€. Ea'R 3F Y. .. .. r ,~ - s ~' ~~. ~~'. ~I Y p", ~M£ ~., U s RI £', € x z i'J Y xr 5 a ~. ~c sd ` _ ~ ' S ~ ~ " . ~ i T A E s x A ^f fE Y C i p X ~ nF S' f. y .. 5 .. W k• ~ 6i y 5 Ks z k' R e ., T. __ Rg R, o. _ _ _ _ . p W &' ~ o LL vv e ~ - F'ih' 3 c ~, 3~ ~_ b Sg F. _ _ _ .. _ EC - ,'G'n I : , . . ~i:. ue ° _ `s .: !'. ~,a .... .... ~.. ~.... i2 ~~ .. `<'s, ...>.. ~. 5 ~~ W a °e E ' S~ • , "~. is' N ~Y ~ ; y. ' ~ac ~~. ^y~a~'r e. a~ a S _~"-., ~X ~e ~ . _.. ... a~xy k _ nn=i s u • r' e ~ ~ ~ ~ e _ ~ a ~ ' . . r ~ u w ~ N e 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 T0: Mayor and ne'VDers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Nefl , City Engineer BY: L1nda Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE AOYERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE ASPHALT AESUAFACING ON HELMS AVENUE, BEINEEN NINTH STREET AND ARRON HIGIMAY AND LUCAS RANCH ROAD, FWRTH STREET TO FIFTH STREET AND SANTA AAITA, FWRTN STREET TO END OF ROAD, TO BE FUNDED FROM STREET REHABILITATION, ACCWNT N0. 09-4637-9W2 RECOREIOATIdI: It 1s recom~ended that Ctiy Council approve plans and specifications for the Asphalt Resurfacing Protect and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting 81ds". BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS The subfect project plans and speclflcatlors have been campteted Dy staff and approved by the C1ty Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is f78,253.W. Legal advertising is scheduled for June 23 and June 30, 1993, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Thursday, July 8, 1993. Respectfully submitted, '~~(' ~(,.,e,~l N1111am J. O'Ndy C1ty Engineer NJO:LB:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~3 - ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CItt COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ASPHALT RESURFACING PRQIECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CItt CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it Ts the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain Improvements 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6e and are hereby approved as the plans and speclflcati ons for "Asphalt Resurfacing Proi ect'. BE IT FORTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and sper,•tficatlons, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to w1 t: "NOTICE INVITING SEALEO BIOS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Counctl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 8th day of July 1993, sealed bids or proposals for the "Asphalt Resurfacing Project" in Bald City. Bids wT11 be opened and publicly read lmmedtateiy to the office of the City Clerk, 10500 C1v1c Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Asphalt Resurfacing Project". PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby gfven that in accordance with the provisions of Callfornta labor Cade, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of Callfornta 1s required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornta, and are available to arty interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such detenninatlons to be posted at the job site. Is The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herelnbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention Ts directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen 1n arry apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Soint apprenticeship camml ttee nearest the site of the oubl is works project and which administers the apprenticeship program 1n that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen that will be used to the performance of the contract. The ratio of aDPrentlces to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the tolnt apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can show that 1t 1s replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contrector 1s required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen 1n aRy apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative Lo apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements mgy be obtained from the Dl rector of Industrlai Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shalt constitute a legal day's work far all 17 workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon arty of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar ddy during which said taborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective 6arga1ning agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, pdyable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (105;) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Tnto the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100'b) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond 1n an amount equal to fifty percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for aqy materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or arly work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering Ms employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered Into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal form has not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Cade, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract 1s awarded. The work Ts to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file 1n Lhe Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, 18 wilt be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E35.00, said E35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the glens and specifications will be mailed when said request Ts accompanied by payment stipuiated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515,00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter Tnto a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and SpecifTCatlons regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retentlonl• The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 16th day of June, 1993. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19 or ATTEST: er ADVERTISE ON JUNE 23, 1993 JUNE 30, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: June 16, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner HY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REJECTION OF ALL HTDS FOR THE CHAFFEY-GANCIA BARN CONSTAIJCTION PROJECT NdCOMMRIDATIOs Staff recommends that, pursuant to the General Specifications, the CSty Council reject all Dida for the Chaffey-Garcia Earn Construction Project as non- responsive to the needs of the CSiy through minute action. BACQ'NUUIID i MZ\LYSIS Pursuant to previous City Council action, bide were solicited for the auDject project. Six bids were received for the bid opening on April 16, 1993. The amounts of the bide varied greatly with an apparent low bid of $123,456.00. After considering the bids and deducting options identlEied in the General Specifications, staff was able to lower the bid to $110,056.00. However, only $100,000.00 is available through mitigation funds submitted by The Wattson Arno Company for construction of Foothill Marketplace. The Etiwanda Historical Society has offered to contribute funds to cover the coat of the contract - the additional $10,056.00. While this will covet the coat of the contract, it does not provide for any contingency funds for the project. These funds usually run 15 percent of the contract amount. Therefore, an additional $16,508.40 is neceaeazy. In order to assist the Etiwanda Historical Sxlety with the construction of the barn, the City Se exploring other funding sources. It nppears, however, that additional funds will not be available prior to the expiration of the bide. A9 a result, the hide will expire. Staff will continue to work with the Etiwanda Historical Society to explore additional funding eoureea for construction of the barn. Once funds are available, the project will be euDmitted to the City Council for the authorization to re-bid the project. BE:EM/j Es LA/ C1'17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June i6, 1993 - T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nillian J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: MTke Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROYEMENT PROGRAM AND TNENTY- YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN RECOMEIDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution approving the prepared Local Measure "I" Five-Year Capttat Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of Lhe Intended use of Local Measure "I" funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Measure "I", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local turisdiction receiving progran revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Iaprovement Program and a 20- Year Transportation Plan which outitnes the specific protects upon which those funds shall be expended. Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Improvenent plan schedule to be adapted Dy City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. The Five-Year list has been overprogrammed to allow for slippage and to insure that the adopted pion contains ample protects for Measure "I" expenditures. If change are necessary (additions or deletions 1, the plan mqy be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with Ctty Council approval. Attachment B indicated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive f4.9 million which averages out to one million dollars per year. SANBAG has advised us the 20-Year Transportation Plan for Local Measure "I" funds can be a list of protects for a 20-year period of narrative poitcy statement estimating the types of protects Local Measure "I" funds are to be used for and the percentage of 21 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 5-YR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR06RAM AND 20-YR TRANSPORTATION PLAN June 16, 1993 Page 2 funds allocated for each type of protect. Since it is very difficult to list actual protects 20 years in advance, staff recommends Council approve the policy statement. The recommended policy statement is shown in Attachment 1. Respectfully supr~ltted, Nilliam J. 0' ei City Engineer WJO:MO:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~-~3S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGPAM AND TNENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLwY FOR THE E%PENDITURE OF MEASURE I FUND5 NNEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in Noven~er 1989 authoriziny San Bernardino Associated Goverrmenis, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose c one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable 1n the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and NHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic awtnagement programs authorized 1n the Expenditure Plans set forth 1n Ordinance No. 89-1 of the Authority; and NHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance require each local ~urlsdiction receiving revenue from the tax Lo expend ;:hose funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and a Twen>;y-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local ~urisdtction; and NHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local ~urisdictlon annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans and amend them when necessary. NON, TNEREFOAE, OE IT RESOLVED thet the City Council of the C1;y of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby amends the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan. A copy show/ng the amendment 1s attached to this Resolution. 0 o O o o m o 0 m o a O o 0 0 0 0 0 P w OO 00 w w N N o O w O O w N N N w % % O O M1 F % w W w a w % O O O p ~ O O O O O O O O ~ ~ O O% ml Q % % c % w c w w e % N % V A O O % I n O F w % % R 0 % N O O O O% O O ON O ~ O O O O p O O O O% % O % % O O w % % % O % % % % I O O O O q O O q O %I O q H % % w % » % 0 0 o m o 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 a~ °o % % c oo n q % % a°~ % % % % °% w % PI n m n a. % % ar o H ~ o °w o 0 0 0 ~ ~ o o c o T N % O O O N O w O O O O T N O O O I % P 0 O w % w % % % 4. % % % O O q O p O O p p O q q q p p rZi w O O ; z z a z z ; z ; a z Z Z z z z < t Vq' < ( i { t p< ( < i S q qtl { t J F OHO Zp ZO LO iyp~ .] 2 Si ;; 2a 22 %S % S Z; S% N xF;r~ Y ;rn Zw %rr i ;w Erpi iN iM 2nOi %hOi ;O ; S i~ '~LN < „ YHaF U' YF YF 3F YF O Yh YF YH YH tlh YF YF N O tlF YH Y q(•]( O O( O< O{ p{ p( O< qt p( O< O( q< O< p( S V 3FSrv a 2rFi ;F F F% F F h F M H F F H M F iH sF aH sF zF iF s.. aH aH a, < FuF, Y Ma H, F, by rVi HH H~ FN FIaY NN Fn FM T 1IY~ FN HrNi U YmYb % NFN ¢Y0 p00 Yqq 4 Ym tltl tlY Y01 tlrtyyl Ytl tlE{yy~~ {a~ i tltl{T. Ym ytI' bFl¢NK 3 F¢ Ntl %K aHla H ~i tlhla ~C %~ ~i Na NR S E F6 NC m hF SM H ~ tl Y ~y<i' O H F ii O H O < O pN J i N ~ J L[f N K .] I.IY Y M tl rvU FH .1 tl W N YO Y Y SS ~ % ( i tl C > K ~Y iY a Y O U > a Y ri o H % S ~% U tl( O O O OS OH L O ( ~1 a y i X Y Oh } r/~ HD O M My p ~jaN 6 .1 M ~ a F N q Ipi < Uy, yp<~ ayy M I i ~`l (U ~> rl KY itl !M y%~S HN ~ O T ~ ~ ~i H~ YYm Y U ~1 U O N sp yea YC ~i R6' 0 S O e~e O {N~ pV~ MK U O ry<~ H F U VS ( UT S S0 U% iU PoN SF w r K [5'`2 tl Y< yyqM jy yO rPi ~ ~ H .pl O N h N M i R R > < < tl N N N N N N tl N ~ IC ~ ~ O ri H d < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ °o .°n » °o o° ° m W o °W o °o ° w W °o °w °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O h W W N W h W W w W w W W W Ow p ~ O O O ~ O O O O w O O ~ O O O N O O W O O N w W e o W °o O 0 0 0 0 + o W o 0 0 m N w m 0 W W W W W O N O O ~ O O ~ ° O O O O O G N O w W w O O O W O W O W O W O W O O O O O O O h w N w W w w N ON O O O ~ ON ~ O ~ O O ON O O O W O N O ° + N N w N W w O O O O O O O O N O J O O U ~ O O O N N W O O N N w W N W N N W O N N O W O S W 2 2 O O 0 0 o z o 0 o q q q ° q o a o a F z z „ x z 2 5 Z T~ t< e s < < < a < < < < e t e e U' « 'U O < b O O O U' G M O F U' G G O 22 ~] 2Z SZ Z ZZ 2S 22 2z ZZ ZZ J ZS rl 2z zi ZS w2 n0 O n0 O O O n0 O O O „ n0 O O N 2n 0 2n 2n O 2n 2n Zn ZM Sn SM 0 SM Sx ~ Z 2n SM x„ 6 dF t dF dF ¢ F YM mF YF tlF tlF < YH „O dH YH mF YF d of s q< o< c o< q< qt q< oe q< x a< ~i o< q< qe q< S E p F H O H F M M H H tl F FH d F H F H ZH ¢ 3n 5H U Sn SH 3n Sn SH Zn ¢ 5H U< ¢ 2H ZH Zn Z~ .l ri V .1 .l `1 J J rt V ~] Y U ~] H V ..l < Fn H Hn Hn i.i Fr+ Hn Hn Fn Fn Hn F Hn NH F Fn Fn FH Fn U dW d Ym d0 < mY tlp m0 pm Y0 mm p Ym ¢d p YPI tld tltl tlm O d6 m mt d< S d< Y< m< tl< Y4 mt tl Y< mn m Y< d< tl< Y< ~] ¢S ¢ ¢S d5 „ ¢S m2 6S ¢Z ¢S mY' ¢ 1'Z Fq d mi ¢S ¢0.' ¢S Nd N MK N¢ N b1¢ N¢ Nd N¢ N¢ N¢ W Tm nI N m¢ N2 N¢ N¢ 2 < Y t¢^ O i 2 V Mm K O¢ F ~<.t , m q M N d ¢2 O ~ O d N S ¢ O ~ O N F On O N F O F< N Z O tl ¢ M tl om zyYy~~ o.a x om Z o < 0 0 off o W Fq CIF KT Fm V' ¢< H H K m F D OC F ~ Fp H H > 4N N t< ¢b N d d mS f~ F< H ptl N HY Y d O FH d Sm YY M< O < < ¢O rl Z p F> F m„ S, FM ¢ rl NS m Hm N m¢ J < tlC d< O~] pZ L Zn F tl0 m¢ O ~]¢ ¢ O m¢ N yY ~ ¢Z M 65 0A ¢~ YU O O O H S > <N m Z UN <'h Z0 W 1' L O V 'ma ~ M N m p Y < t t J > > > < y > > O_ O O m < < i < < F M1 wl J i t < < ~ ~ i d S m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 3 a ~ m m eo ~ ~ a ~ a ; m °o °m °m °p °o a°~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ °O °o °o °o N °p °o '0 0 0 0 o r o o °m r o 0 v. ~ N o h .. o O m N N N N m N y o ~ o m o 0 o O o o a ~ o N 00 m O O O O O N O m a1 m Q O O O O O O O O O O v1 O O N m N h O O m m W h N N m m O O O O O O O O O O O O p P ~ ON O O N O N N N O O m O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 O O V O m m 0 m N m m N m m °a °c m °o °o m ° w °m m ° °° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m m n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oN m o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O b N 00 N 00 N % 00 N N O° O O O O O O N O N O O N % N N N N VI N h Z i O W_ M `l q O p q O p < O O q O < > n 2 2 S S S Z S „ 2 2 2 2 M 00 O < < < % < < < < < < t N 22 F pni <S i iEi N zz zx ii O Z; ZZ Y 2 Sz i<m ii iL ZZ ii rdi •lN ~ N O n0 O V O O< O O <<~' O O O O x < N 2 [9 2w 2w in ¢w ym iw ~2 ;M 2M ;w ;n V 2S t O Y H mN CF tl e1F tlF b H tlF ~e1t tlF tlH tlF tlF NO tl O q< q< O< U p< p< 02 < p< FC p< O< q< q< q E H U H H H 2 F H Zn F H H H M H H S %F o Zw 3w [w < yw 3w <% Fw 3n OY 3n Sn Sn 3w <yy'' U < N N~ Fw FM Mw eN MM hN tl0 mw MM °< FM FN Hu NM ,M4 V% Z N6 NK NK tN~ S %~ N~ K 0.i %~ t°l~ W6 NK %C %~ ~KKW F~ G H S 6 ~ p ~ < Say rqi O O < m F S~ rl t N < m 2 K ~ '..t U H H N W x O O M ~ U OF >tl x % ~ a s Fo ~m v u < i o x m ~°, i < r% qu E O O <F F S U U OO O O i \H tl Y O_ Ftl N L H F O O F~ HW H x tl0 O t F~ rlH H F < S ~ , tltl Y~wpi H Ntl? °V i H w ~Cx ~~ x ~ ~°. ~ o o <~ '0 2~C g~g ~S gF~ °o °o s N ~ ~°m <~ s a u s ~ <> mod" <> ~OZ 2 r~ mu ~ ~ F e .s W H H U ~ tl tl M < % o z H x i t s s ri Z u u ~ ~ ~ m ~ a „ i H °n m o i i N : $ $ ~ a ~ ~ H H o ~ Z > a a s 20 VGAR LOCFlL MLASLIRC I 1RAN~F'L'FitATlOfd PLFlN The c0 Vear Local Measure I Transportatton Plan for the expenelt Lure nt Measure T funds wtll uw Thr• Ctty's General Plan Ctrculatton Flement as a base. (t i~ anttctpated that the funds will he allocated to the tol low my manner: TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT PERCENT Ma,ntenanc e> Rehabtlitatcon 30 and Repay of Lxtsttny Roadways Tr afi tr. Siynal Improvements 1('r S f.r Net wtcient ng 20 Intersection improvements 10 Ftatlr'uad Cr ossi ny lmpr ovements 10 Slurry and Ch rp ~'.r•al ~0 rr l' I r. t~.Li ny ,tr Bets sae (lr ty'~, Cienaral Plan Cirrulat unt Element) ° i i w I I = a Fad ~ 1 C O I I ! f Q ~ ~j D °o 11 ~ ~ v~v~4o?a ~ I ~ a Z ~.'~w~¢z_owf2~ p I I I ~ ~ U ~ Ts°a [3ow 1 O ~ m D O _ Q w 6W ~y QON yVjJJJJ O ~~ w N@ a¢ a _ S J w O~QZ ~OWEQ ~w W WW pp U O Q D¢ W 6 LL~ 0 Z 6 N N N O 1 ~~~<moo = o ~ ~::~ ~ ~ ~_ (") a ~L * .r,, ....wo;.ryowrzoeoiw~.e~.rst DATE: May 14, 1993 TO: San Bernardino Associated Governments 472 North Arrmvh¢ad Avenue San Bernardino, Ca(ijornia 92401 (714) 884-4276 FAX: (714)885-4407 Memo FROM: Deborah Robinson Barmack Dinx:tor of Management Services SIJI3TEt.'1': Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Plans and Twenty Year Transportation Plans This memorandum serves as notification of the need for each city and the county to adopt the annual Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for expenditures of revenue from Measure I, the countywide transportation sales tax program administered by San Bernazdino Associated Governments (SANBAG). It is rrquested that the updated Measure I plan be adopted by your governing board and forwarded to SANBAG by July 15, 1993. Measure I requires that each local jurisdiction receiving program revenues annually adopt a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and a Twenty Yeaz Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. This package is provided to assist you in the amwal review and adoption of the plans. You may also wish to refer to the Measure I Policies for information related to eligible projects. Please forwazd the following to SANBAG: Resolution of your governing body adapting the 1993-98 Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Program. A sample resolution is enclosed as Attachment A for your convenience. 2. Copy of the adopted Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The Program should consist of a listing of projects which includes the facility/street name; project limits, and description of the improvement. A sample format for both the Valley and the Mountain/Desert regions is enclosed as Attachment C. A copy of the Measure I Twenty Year Transportation Plan. A twenty year plan should necessarily contaht some fluidity and should be consistent with the general plan circulation element and other jurisdictional and regional plans. The twenty year plan may consist of either: Garr n/ Adelnnrn. earnmc. Rip B¢ur fake, C'hmo, China 7/I//S Cohon. Fontana. GranCTrrmrr. He.tperin Nghland. Lnmu Lmda. Momrlair druJlcr, Onuum. Nun¢h:r Qrrnrnnngu RrAnnde Rmlm, San bemardmo, 7lrennnmr Rnlrn.r, Uplnnd, VinnnNlr, }Tampa Tnmru np ~pplr l'nl7rv. Yurrn Vnllre Cnunn' nlSnn Rrrnnrrlmn Patricia A. Chamberlaine May 14, 1993 Memo -Page 2 A. A continued list of projects which your jurisdiction anticipates !o be completed during the remaining term of the Measure I program, using the same format as the Five Yeaz Capita Improvement Program, or B. A narrative policy statemenf which will guide your jurisdiction in its continued progmmming of funds for the remaining term of Measure I program. if your jurisdiction provided SANBAG with a copy of the Twenty Year Transportation Plan in 1992 and it has not bcen amended, it is nM neoessazy to forward another copy to SAIVBAG. Please indicate that the prior submittal should remain in effect. 4. A copy of your jurisdictions Proposition 111 Maintenance of P.ffort report. If your jurisdiction provided SANBAG with a tppy of this rP.pOr[ in 1992, i[ is not nocecsaty to forward a new Dopy. A Measure I Revenue Fsfunate r Local ass-Through Funds (Attachment B) is enclosed for planning purposes and provides of the revenue your jurisdiction may receive in the five year planning period. Over-programming of projects m the Measure I program is permissible to allow for slippage and to insure that the adopted plans contain ample projects for Measure I expenditures. Although amendments to the plan can be adopted throughout the year by action of your governing body, over-programming may minimize that necessity. If the Five Yeaz Capital Improvement Progrun is amended by your governing board during the yeaz, please send a copy of the action to SANBAG for information puryoses. If you have any questions regarding the ual adoption these plans, please call me directly. I look forwazd to r.,ceiving your plans y July 15, 1993. Atuchments ~_~ cc: SANBAG Board Member ATTACFRffitiY B a F z m z G a Mm NeoN mM1 ntlm a M ~~ ~ PvQl N o~N .'O, a~~~R .p 0p pq N1~0 u`O `Oti rn N~ NN Nu N ~M ~V ~a~ M1~ N~P~rv ~MK'c ~N ~mMar, r~ .N.~.".'n ~'oN.~,Y ~a~nn n'a o~m n~ NS o°.wa= u. 'm~oM ~CC U~.M o.oN e.i ~N mmrm'' w NMn6v1~M~N.M1--mM NM1NNNO ry Nd~- JtMV M1 NPVPN YYr r ~- ~ ep~ NN p~ ]N~ u M~~-' Nf~~1~NPNN0~0 ~-^ ~^J uuJM1 MN V^DOa ?X NE uml~PmOM N..Wpp M~ NV'.NI dN'O .OM m~Om uw .tMMm min ~- m~~~~OVm mm N$yi O~ .uf~ ~uaa.- m II.~ VV yL n b~Nn~mNYN10 Ya1d do mN m'O x~ mP ~Im~I JI~~ >~ KrvM~rm-M~m~~J~YV tl'^ _ NN.. g~N1-,0 H°o g^^ .- Mm~ Y ~.- pp,, ppQ~N.. do P~ $^I~ONOUprvNmMOmn 'a N a p$p~, vl~ mN qm S'UA YpN LL .r MdarvvPmnj~~gvM1iN N u a O~ M1n mPJVm CP r r ~- N a o rc N A S .~ Y ~q L~ '~ Z ._. ~ V ~a a~ =& ro ~J ~Ma 'a _ ~R &~ y rE NONm~a~umi~MPJ ~P orNrnia .= ~m rvn MNNU N~~~OUMUOMaN ~- ~~P o ~vG 0~~ ~`~~~P~ PP0~6 ~p P `\\ c\O~ t~ \PP~S. G°~a rya Pp N\G 993 °\\~aa9ei JeseN°es pPPSF~PS~~ `JSa as era \6 , ~`e~ ~ Y~ao dn`os\`a0 ~'pS~~~Pp\~ ~e~~\as`o J ~d pP ~ P ~\ Sp O \e °~ a P\ oei~ PAe PJ pP Sao OPS~ tt'a ~,\,am'p J°~~o9 J`c~ass9 P~~,p`Q PSSF "°~~M1aQa e\~et. O P°oe~ `(,~sa P ~ SpSSpPP Qa~s e~~°\ea~O~~ed S °ac P \1PS\ Jg6 p. e e*\s\~~ ,9~,~ p` ~0~~~`a\u~' FPp~ , JS~O~~'SO ,\o `emoJ poe\as `c a~e a~ oS~Sre ey. GS P~P~-\\ a~°sea~ a(a~\0\a~eo ~~aP d~ Ve ~;p\. SJP~O PS\ P`\ee\~r~c~s?see s\~a\a`6~cmy\ea\ca~o \~~~a 9ae oY JR\JS`~ase P oe\ao°oree~\ez\je \ ash aJ~p acac7Fed\ia `e\o a*a<~o erc\as~ easµed~Os S Qa~Q ds° P ~Pt~ a`d°°~~o~d ;~ NQa~°~ Qad~ ~e ;~~s\a9\~°` aie~`esp~°~`\Y~ P `a\~c 2\9 dSre~~~,aV aod°zd~ de`s \O aca°\o \ra~ ~' e `s \a\e ~d~a \~~e ~ \r ~e P s \r se ~Mpac~do.Nas\eGa\~\O aa\°e`~dz~\s\v°~ ese ~°~~\ddCP 'Cra.~2029°a~ ~\r ma~Y\. M ~\s~y ~a0\~ ~s`0`•` ~~_tsa. e~Qa ae ~\ea a\\ ad O`~ ~.`,.~ d~ zsra\he \e\\` ~\hp S~t~9 ~ eeh~c\as ~~GSY s\a ~°°9~ pe`G~a Srese ~er~oi\re ~\5\~eGAY °\r d~\°`s\ ee\c~e~\mz ~ a~ eo\,~et\P\Sa\ .~\ed. r. s ~ ~\e s eer e~.\~OY ,11 ~,,//~~ °~ Peso. ~. J".A~~1.~0``e~ i m`c~ ~eF Gp~~P~ P _ / G 1:171 VC' ILA1V1aiV V VGNMV1V liH STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 7993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jadc Lam, AICP, Cdy Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION 70 REMOVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FROM IRREPARABLE VEHICLES TO USE AS SPARE PARTS FOR OTHER CITY FLEET VEHICLES. That Council authorize fleet maimenance staff to remove existing pans Irom irreparable venicles for use as spare pans on other fleet vehicles as needed. BACKGROLNDlAN ALV SIS The City Corporation Vard currently has Iwo vehicles that are irreparable. One is a 1987 Chevrolet Blazer, unit 202, and one i5 a 1387 Ford C-7000 tlump track, unit 620. The Blazer was in an accident about two years ago and was btaled. The dump tract has a cracked Irame that cannot be repaired and is rwt allowed to be driven per the CalAOrnia Highway Patrol. These vehicles have many automotive and body pans that are in excellent condd'an and Can be used for other vehicles in the Ileet. In order for this to be done, author¢ation must be given by Council. Tha audnors for the Cily state Nat this must be done poor to surplusing the vehices. When the fleet crew is through with paning these units, then authorizatbn will be asketl to surplus these vehicles. At that time, the Cay Purchasing Division will dispose of the vehicles Froperry. Respedlully s fietl, oben m r Administrative Serv~s Director RCD/JAK/mem -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the Clty Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager 13Y: Olen Jones. Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. HACHOROUND: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the tax increment received. For this purpose, when the Protect Area was established In Fiscal Yeaz 1982/83, the Clty loaned money to the Redevelopment Agency in order to establish initial debt. as well as to provide monies for operations. For debt purposes, the C1ty and Agency have continued to maintain this loan from the City, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its fuU tax increment revenue. ANALYSIS: Each Fiscal Year, the Redevelopment Agency repays the loan to the C1ty, including Interest, with tax increment revenues, after paying all debt on outstanding bonds and agreements. During Fiscal Year 1991/92. the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to the City approximately $3.492,895 towazds the principal and Interest on the City/Agency loan. At the present time, it Is necessary for the Agency to continue a pomon of the loan with the City, In order to show sufficient debt to receive the full amount of tax Increment revenue. Therefore, 1t Is necessary for the C1ty to authorJze the Agency to re-borrow the amount of $3,492,895. Respectfully submi/~ft~e~_d, ~n ~. o t da D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager i.ii z yr nriiv~nv ,..~i,nmviv vri STAFF REPORT %:;.. DATE: June 1B, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Pout A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION COMAITTI NG TO DEVELOP THE LOCAL PORTION OF THE TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE SUBREGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE NITH THE REQUTA EMENTS OF THE 1991 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THE 1992 FEDERAL ATTAINMENT PLAN FOR CARBON MONOXIDE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the attached resolution committing to join in the regional effort to reduce automobile travel and air pollution be adopted. BACKGROUND San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANeAGI, in cooperation with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) is assisting local governments in fulfilling their responsibilities as defined 1n the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan (A~iP) and 1992 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Attainment Pian (Air Quality Plans). Both the 1991 AQMP and 1993 CO Plan identify transportation control measures (TCMs) for local government implementation through a trip reduction ordinance or other legally enforceable mechanisms approved by the Air Resources Board (pRB) and the Environmental protection Agency (EPA). SIINBAG and the District are working with governments to craft programs to help meet the 1994 regional and countywide vehicie trip reduction targets identified in the Air Quality Plans. These efforts by local government to achieve the 1994 trip reduction target will also set the stage for long-term strategies and future performance targets to be identified in the 1994 AQMP. All targets must be achieved in order to attain healthful air by 2010. The most recent AQMP (1991 AQMP) called for local governments to develop ordinances to implement specific TCMS that relate to transportation demand management. The dates for implementation of local government control measures have been extended several times beginning 1n 1989. At the request of local governments, the 1992 CO Plan pushed back the deadline for action from the December 31, 1992, date identified in the 1991 AQMP, to December 31, 1993. Recent court decisions requiring a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REDUCTION Of AUTOMOBILE TRAVEL AND AIR POLLUTION June 16, 1993 Page 2 federal implementation plan and pending federal sanctions based on the submittal of the CO Plan to EPA make timely decision-making and action critical. As such, additional delays for implementation of local government action pose an unacceptabie risk. Specifically, the 1991 AQMP calls for local governments to reduce 71 tons per day of reactive organic compounds in 2010. The 1992 CO Plan calls for a reduction from those TCMs of 264 tons per day of carbon monoxide by 2000. The TCMs identified in the 1991 AQMP include: Person Trip Reduction (Alternative Work Weeks, Flextime and Telecommunications) Non-motorized Transportation Employer Rideshare and Transit incentives Parking Management Merchant Transportation Incentives Auto Use Restrictions Growth Management Supplemental Development Standards Policy adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council and District Governing Board as part of the 1991 AQMP and 1992 CO Plan speciftes that local governments have the first opportunity to adopt TCMS. If local governments do not adopt ordinances (or other legally enforceable mechanisms) by December 31, 1993, the District will adopt a "backstop" Rule (proposed Rule 1504) by January 1994, to ensure the air pollution reductions called for in the 1991 AQMP and 1992 CO Plan are achieved. Backstop refers to a set of actions the District will take if the region does not show attainment of the regional trip reduction targets for 1994. Local governments that adopt ordinances will have flexibility in selecting those actions most appropriate for them. Important Deadlines: By June 30, 1993, local governments must describe, via a re so u~Ton or a letter of commitment from the City Manager, enforceable actions they will take in developing and implementing strategies to achieve the 1994 vehicle trip reduction target. This deadline was established by the ARB as part of its resolution approving the 1991 ApMP and is codified in the 1992 CO Plan (i.e., control measure FC-4). The District will also use this information provided by local governments to determine the necessity and extent of the backstop rule. By December 31, 1993, local governments must adopt a trip reduction W CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REDUCTION OF AUTOMOBILE TRAVEL AND AIR POLLUTION June 16, 1993 Page 3 ordinance or other legally enforceable mechanism to meet the 1994 vehicle trip reduction target. These dates represent a one-year extension of time for local government action, as described in the 1991 AQMP. Linka a to the Con estion Management Program: An important aspect of its a or s e n age w e It Ts important that air quality programs De coordinated with CMP efforts and local governments use the CMP as a foundation for subsequent air quality programs. As such, coordination between the District, SCAG, county transportation commissions, local councils of government and local govermments is important. Since adoption of the CMP in November 1992, Rancho Cucanronga has been furthering the goals of the progwam by requiring traffic impact analyses in the prescribed fornwt when appropriate and adopting a Transportation/ Land Use Analysis policy by resolution. The City has also begun monitoring intersection and street perfomnance and reporting results as required. CONCLUSION Nhile some of the canmitn~ents 1n the proposed resolution seem onerous, our commitment to do our best in this effort has alreagy been imposed on us by the Federal and State agencies involved. In ane way or another, each city will have to make a real effort to reduce trips within its jurisdiction or have control methods forced on it. Respectfully s fitted, William J. 0'N it City Engineer WJO:PAR:sd Attachment Resolution No. ~ ~~ <'p A Resotutioa of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Committing to Develop the Local Portion of the Transportation Control Measure Subregional Implementation Program in accordance with the requirements of the 1991 Soa:h Cons[ Air Quality Management Plan wd the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxid.; WHEREAS, both the 1991 Atr Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (CO Plan) include transportation wntrol measures (TCM's) for implemeoUtion by local governments; and WHEREAS, the California Air Resources Board gave conditional approval to the local government TCM's N the 1991 AQMP pending submission of implementation commitments, additional documentation, and secured funding by the South Coast Au Quality Management Distrito (SCAQMD) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) no later than July 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, San Dernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is required to provide documentation on local implementation of TCM's by July 16, 1993, to support SCAG's conformity fmding for approximately S2 bBtion in currently unprogrammed local and regional transportation projects; and WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the SCAQMD will implement a backstop rule (Proposed Rule 1504) by ]aouary 1994 to ensure that local TCM emissions reductions will be achieved; and WHEREAS, the regional actions taken by the SCAQMD would more adversely impact this jurisdiction's economic vitality than actions taken locally; and WHEREAS, the need for and stringency of regional actions will be determined by [he amount of Local action taken [o achieve the local trip reduction target; and WHEREAS, local implementation of actions to reduce trips, and designation of a local trip reduction target that reflects the ability of the jurisdiction to reduce trips, would minimize the application of regional actions in this jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the CO Plan delegates SANBAG the authority and responsibility to designate local trip reducion targets; attd WHEREAS, target desigmtion based on each jurisdiction's ability to reduce trips requires local governmeMS to provide an inveetory of actions taken to reduce trips after 1990 and quantification of the effectiveness of aU other available local TCM actions to SANBAG by July 1993 for approval in Augtut 1993; acrd WHEREAS, the SCAQMD proposes to incorporate the short-term (1994) local trip reduction targets developed through SANBAG into the Handbook on Iucal Government Implementation of Trip Reduction Ordinances and SCAQMD Proposed Rule 1504 by September 1993: and WHEREAS, the Congestion Management Program for San Bernardino County, as amended by acriun of the SANBAG Board of Dtrectors on April 7, 1993, requires South Coast Air Basin jurisdictions to commit to actors by June 30, 1993, and to adopt a tranmortation control measure ordinance by December 31, 1993, as a measure of compliance or risk losing state subvention funds; and WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga has instituted the Congestion Managenent Program by adopting a Land Use/TransportaUon Impact Analysis policy by resolution on March 3, 1993 and has aUeady participated in mottimring, reporting and other CMP activities; t~ NOW,THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will participate in developing both ashort- and long-term local implementation program which SANBAG will incorporate into the TCM subregional implementation program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to prepaze a work program to participate in the following activities necessary to develop and implement ashort-term TCM subregional implementation program by December 31, 1993: I. PARTICIPATE IN THE SANBAG TCM TECHNICAL AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES to assist in developing the TCM subregional implementation program including, but not limited to, development of regional implementation actions, refinement of the wntent and srivcture of the local govemment measures in the TCM subregional implementation program, providing input m the regional agencies, and designation of lord TCM performance targets; 2. DEVELOP AN INVENTORY OF ACTIONS which have been taken since 1987 including adoption and implementation dates which would achieve quantifiable and enforceable trip reductions after 1990 and no later than December 31, 1994; 3. EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL EFFECTIVENESS of all local government actions contained in the SCAQMD Handbook for Local Govemmen[ Implementation of Trip Reduction Ordinances including transportation demand management and land use measures to be used to designate local trip reduMion targets; 4. IDENTIFY FUNDING AND RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS that Deed to be overcome to implement local government xtioos by December 31, 1993, as well as the public acceptability of local acrions; 5. Assist the SANBAG TCM Advisory Committees to DEVELOP STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME FUNDING AND RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS as well as to obtain public acceptance of actions; 6. QUANTIFY THE ESTIMATED TRIP REDUCTIONS W be achieved by the end of 1994 for actions which have, or will be, taken as part of the local implementation program; 7. DEVELOP A LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN which meets the federal and/or regional criteria for enforceability, identityiag resources, funding, and schedule for implementation of Ioral attiotts that have, or will be, adopted as part of the short-term subregional implementation program; 8. DEVELOP A LOCAL MONITORING PROGRAM m monitor implementation of acdoos taken locally to reduce trips; 9. Participate with SANBAG and other local jttrisdictions to DEVELOP A CENTRALIZED MONTTORBVG PROGRAM to provide information needed m prriodicaRy update the subergional transportation model, m track implementation of local actions which have, a will be, taken as part of both the subregiooal implementation Program, and assist in determining the effectiveness of the actions; 10. ADOPT AND IMPLi.MENT ACTIONS contained in the local implemmhalion program by December 31, 1993. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga wiB participate in the SANBAG TCM Tahoical and Policy Advistxy Committers to work toward a subregional consensus oo policy and technical input m the Governing Board of the SCAQMD oo the developmat of Ruk 1504. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will develop a work program to participate in developing the long-tam local implementation program which SANBAG will include in the long-tam TCM subregiooal implementation program to be incorporated into the 1994 SouW Coast Federal Attainment Plan for Omce. Approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meaiug this day of lone, 1993. Mayor Attest: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ii~r vr~ tceuv~nv ~u~nmviv~n STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 1 T0: Mgyor and Meabers of the City Courotl Jack Lays, AICD, C1ty Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Ne11, City Engineer BY: Shellgy Maddox, Engineering ATde SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN A6AEEMEIR FROM RONDAL 6. ALLEN, MARILYN S. ALLEN, S. TODD ALLEN AID JOY A. ALLEN, FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF YALLE VISTA, NORTH OF CANING SUR IIECOI~EIDATION It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the suD~ect Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the sable to record. eAasRUaDiANALrsIs The developers of 7712 Valle V1sta, north of Camino Sur, requested a bu11d1ng penalt far a single family residence. Street lmprovaments aro a condition of 1ssuing the bull ding perwlt. The City does not require said Improvement to be Du11t at this tlsae. Therefore, the developers hsve sudattted a Reai Property Improvement Contract and Lt en Agreement for the construction of the improveuents on Yalie Ytsta. A copy of the Agreement is available to the Cib Clerk's offlee. Respectfully sugmitted, Niltiam J. 0'~'`, ~ C1b Engineer NJO:SN:diw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 93 - ~a 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R/1NCH0 CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEDTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RONDAL G. ALLEN, MARILYN S. ALLEN, S. TODD ALLEN AND JOY A. ALLEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEPo( TO SIGN THE SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of publ7c improvements in conlunctlon with building penntt lssuarMe: and NHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, pavement, drive approaches, sidewalk, street 1lghts, and street trees estab115hed as prerequisite to issuance of bull ding permit for 7712 Valle Yista has Deen met by entry into a Real Property Improveaent Contract and Lten Agreement by Rondal G. Allen, Marilyn S. Alien, S. Todd Allen and Joy A. Atlen. NON THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLYE to accept sold Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign soma, and directs the City Clerk to record same 1n the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Caltfornle. /AUE wsr~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVL9ION N rrEM: TITLE: ALLF.I~ LIEN f~MT. Exl~rr: "A „ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: ,lone 15, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY WITHIN HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET, AND SAPPHIRE STREET AT THE BANYAN STREET CHANNEL, IN CONNECTION KITH OEYELOPMENT OF TRACT N0. 13728, SUBMITTED BY HILLSIDE/SAPPHIRE VENTURE, LTD. It 15 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for lnstallatton of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain facility 1n connection with development of Tract No. 13726, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tract No. 13728, Hillside/Sapphire Yenture, Ltd. (the developer) was required to install a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility located in Hillside Road and Sapphire Street, and Sapphire Street at the Banyan Street Channel. The storm drain facilities have been completed by the developer and accepted by the City. The developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of said Master Planned Stonn Drain Facilities. Staff has reviewed and verified the submittal. The amount due the developer is 5628,708.23. He will also receive a credit of 585,000.00 toward the future drainage fees to be paid upon the issuance of building permits for the homes within the pro3ect. Respectfully sub~itted, i William J. O'Neil City Engineer ~ WJO:JAD:dIw Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 93' la~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STOAM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT N0. 13728 WHEREAS, the City Council of the fity of Rancho Cucamonga has for 1t5 consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Hillside/Sapphire Venture, Ltd., developer, for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Starm Drain Facility, located within Hillside Road and Sapphire Street, and Sapphire Street at the Banyan Street Channel. WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said storm drain installation; and NHEREAS, the developer at the time of Issuance of the building permits, has or will receive fee credit from the drainage fees for the amount as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement he and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Aggeement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA MASTER PLAN,STORM DRAIN FACILITY WITHIN HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET, AND SAPPHIRE ST. AT THE BANYAN ST. CFWNNEL TRACT NO. I` 13728 -CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE June 16, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Counci] FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst ~~., ~:' SUBJECC: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE REDEMPTION OF THE CITY'S HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, 1984 SERIES A, APPROVING A MORTGAGE LOAN PURCHASE CONTRACT AND A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO. Approve the attached Resolution and authorize the execution of contracts and documents related to the sale of the mortgages. In 1983 and 1984 the Redevelopment Agency and City of Rancho Cucamonga issued mortgage revenue bonds which provided ownership opportunities for first-time home buyers. These bonds were supported solely by the payment of the mortgages, and do not represent obligations of the City or Agency. The period to originate home mortgages under these programs has expired. For this reason, in 1992, the City/Agenty duetted staff to investigate the defeasance of the outstanding bonds. Agency staff has been working with Stone & Youngberg to determine the best method for the closure of the outstanding bond issues. Three options have been investigated: defeasance to maturity; Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO); and Whole Mortgage Loan Sale. Based on a review of the outstanding mortgage loans and the terms of the bond programs, the best option has been determined to be the Whole Mortgage Loan Sale. Under this method, the 84 remaining loans from these programs would be sold to an investment firth. The prorneds of the sale of these loans would be used to pay off the outstanding bonds and transaction costs (legal and professional Eees associated with the sale. Contrails for these services have been submitted for approval under separate action). Additionally, as required by the bond programs, each existing loan would receive a certain amount of mortgage forgiveness, estimated at an average of approximately $950 per loan. The remaining proceeds from the sale would be 47 Iwe 16, 1993 Staff Report -Whole Loan Sale Professional Services Page 2 disbursed to the bond issuer (City and Agency). These proceeds aze contingent on the mazket price of the loans at the time of the sale, but aze currently estimated at approximately $900,000. With the exception of the mortgage forgiveness generated from the sale proceeds, the sale of the loans has no effect on the homeowners. In order to conclude this transaction, it is necessary to contract for the services of a placement agent, special transaction counsel, and financial advisor. The placement agent is responsible for reviewing the bond indentures of the programs, preparing a "due diligence" review of the outstanding loans, and mazketing the loans to investors, as well as obtaining a legal opinion on the sale in regard to compliance with federal tax laws. Staff has negotiated a contraM price of $140,000 for Whipple, Kinsell & O'Neal to act as placement agent for this transaction. This fee would be paid directly from the sale proceeds. The finanaal advisor works with the placement agent to develop the structure of the sate, review the pricing of the sale, and to ensure that the finanrial interests of the City/Agency are protected. Staff has negotiated a contract price of $30,000 for Stone dr Youngberg (who has worked with the Agency on prior bond issues) to act as financial advisor for this transaction. This fee would be paid directly from the sale proceeds. Special transaction counsel works on behalf of the City/Agency, to ensure that the sale complies with applicable State law, and to ensure that the sale terms do not place the City/Agency at risk. Staff has negotiated a contract price of $40,000 with Best Best 6r Krieger, who has worked with the City/Agency in prior bond transactions. The fees for these professional services are consistent with costs related to similaz, recent transactions. All other costs relating to the sale will also be paid directly from the sale proceeds. Res tfu~u mitted, Jack tam, AICP City Manager RESOLUTION N0. y3- ~a / AII~PIJIdeQ A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE REDEMPTION OF THS CITY'S HOME MORTGAGE REVSNUS BONDS, 1984 SSRiES A, APPROVING A MORTGAGE LOAN PURCHASS AGRSEMENT AND A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTSRS PROPERLY RfiLATHD THERETO WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has heretofore issued its Rome Mortgage Revenue Honds, 1984 Series A (the "Bonds") in the original aggregate principal amount of $27,825,000 pursuant to a Trust Indenture dated as of July 1, 1984 (the "Indenture"), between the Ci[y and Seattle-First National Bank, Seattle, Washington, as trustee (the "Trustee"); and WHEREAS, the City deems it in its beat interest to sell all the mortgage loans (the "Mortgage Loans") securing the Honda in order to discharge the Indenture and pay in full the redemption price of the outstanding Bonds on July 1, 1993, from the proceeds of the sale of such Mortgage Loans; and WHEREAS, in order to sell the Mortgage Loans, the City proposes to enter into a Whole Mortgage Loan Purchase Con¢nitment (the ^MOrtgage Loan Purchase Agreement") between the City and Sandler G'Neill Mortgage Finance Corp. or its designee (the "Purchaser); and WHEREAS, the proceeds derived from the sale of the Mortgage Loans will be used to effect the redemption of the Honds, as described above; and WHEREAS, Whipple, Kinsell & O'Neal, Inc. (the "Placement Agent^) intends to assist the City in the sale of the Mortgage Loans and for this purpose has presented Co the City a Memorandum of Understanding (the "Memorandum of Understanding") between the City and the Placement Agent; and WHF,REAS, the City proposes to enter into a Pirst Supplemental Trust Indenture for the purpose of amending Section 1401(A) of the Indenture; and WHEREAS, copies of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, the M_morandum of Understanding and the Pirat Supplemental Trust Indenture have been presented to the City for approval at this time, and it ie desirable that such documents now be approved by the City and the transactions contemplated thereby consummated ae soon ae practicable; NOW, THEREPORE, it is hereby found, determined and ordered, as follows: NB170t82 correct. Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and Section 2. Approval of First Supplemental Trust Indenture. The First Supplemental Trust Indenture between the City and the Trustee, dated June 1, 1993 (the "Supplemental Indenture"), which amends and restates Section 1901(A) of the Indenture, in substantially the form presented to this meeting ie hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Supplemental Indenture, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest to such execution and delivery of the Supplemental Indenture, on behalf of the City, with such changes therein as shall be approved by the City Manager in consultation with special counsel to the City, the execution thereof co establish conclusive evidence of such approval. Section 3. Sale of Mortgage Loans: 7~pproval of Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement. The City hereby approves the sale of the Mortgage Loans pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Pux~chaee Agreement. The Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented to this meeting is hereby approved, and the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement on behalf of trie City, with such changes therein as shall be approved by the City Manager in consultation with special counsel to the City, the execution thereof to establish conclusive evidence of such approval. In thin connection, the City Manager is authorized to negotiate with the Purchaser for the beat price obtainable in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager, in consultation with the City'a financial advisor, for the sale of the Mortgage Loans. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to notify the Trustee of the transactions approved by this Resolution and to direct the Tzuatee to take all actions in connection with the sale of the Mortgage Loans ae may be determined necessary by the City Manager in consultation with special counsel to the City, including entering into any required bailment arrangement with respect to the Mortgage Loans and sending any required notices to mortgagors and mortgage aervicera. Section 4. Redemption of Bonds. The City hereby autriorizea the City Manager to direct the Trua tee to give notice of redemption to the owners of the outstanding Bonds, and thereafter to call for redemption all outstanding Bonds as soon as practicable pursuant to the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Honds to be redeemed, together with accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption, being July 1, 1993. Section 5. ~norandum of Understanding. The Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Placement Agent in substantially the form presented to this meeting is hereby approved and the City Manager ie hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City with such changes therein as shall be approved by the City Manager N81 ]0282 ' 2' in consultation with special counsel to the City, the execution thereof to establish conclusive evidence of such approval. Section 6. Mortaaae Loan Servicer. The appointment of a successor servicer for the servicing of the Mortgage Loans as requested by the Purchaser pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement is hereby approved. The City Manager is authorized and directed to send a notice of termination to any existing servicers of the Mortgage Loans, such termination notice to be consistent with the termination provisions of any existing servicing agreements with such services. Section 7. Special Counsel. Beat, Seat & Krieger ie hereby retained as special counsel to the City in connection with the sale of the Mortgage Loans, redemption of the Bonds and the other transactions contemplated by this Resolution. Section S. Other Acta. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Finance Director, the City Clerk and the other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all documents and papers and to perform and do any and all acts and things deemed necessary or convenient in order to effect the execution and delivery of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding, the Bale of the Mortgage Loans and the performance of any other action which may be necessary or desirable in connection therewith, or to carry out the intent or purpose of this Resolution and any such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 16th day of Sune, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga FJ8170282 - 3 - RHSOLUTION NO. (~ 2 /~~ A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATITHORZZING THE RHDHMPTZON OF TEE CITY'S HOMB MORTGAGH RBVHNUH BONDS, 1984 SHRIBS A, APPROVING A MORTGAGB LOAN PURCHASB AGRSHMHNT AND A MHMORANDUM OF VNDHRSTANDING, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RHLATHD THHRHTO WHHRHAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City') has heretofore issued its Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A (the ^Honds") in the original aggregate principal amount of $27,825,000 pursuant to a Trust indenture dated as of July 1, 1954 (the ^Indenture"), between the City and Seattle-First National Bank, Seattle, Washington, as trustee (the ^Truatee"); and WHEREAS, the City deems iC in its beat interest to sell all the mortgage loans (the "Mortgage Loans") securing the Honds in order to discharge the Indenture and pay in full the redemption price of the outstanding Honds on July 1, 1993, from the proceeds of the sale of such Mortgage Loans; and WHHRHA3, in order to sell the Mortgage Loans, the City proposes to enter into a Whole Mortgage Loan Purchase Commitment (the "Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement") between the City and Sandler O'Neill Mortgage Finance Corp. or its designee (the "Purchaser); and WHHRHAS, the proceeds derived from the sale of the Mortgage Loans will be used to effect the redemption of the Bonds, as described above; and WHHREAS, Whipple, %inaell & O'Neal, Inc. (the "Placement Agent^) intends to assist the City in the sale of the Mortgage Loans and for this purpose has presented to the City a Memorandum of Vnderstanding (the "Memorandum of Understanding^) between the City and the Placement Agent; anfl WHHRHAS, copies of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding have been presented to the City for approval at this time, and it is desirable that such documents now be approved by the City and the transactions contemplated thereby consummated as Boor. as practicable; NOW, THSRHFORS, it is hereby found, determined and ordered, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct. NB170282 ^L7 Section 2. Sale of Mortg~.ge Loane• Aooroval of Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement. The City hereby approves the sale of the Mortgage Loans pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement. The Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented tc this meeting is hereby approved, and the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement on behalf of the City, with such changes therein ae shall be approved by the City Manager in consultation with special counsel to the City, the execution thereof to establish conclusive evidence of such approval. In this connection, the City Manager is authorized to negotiate with the Purchaser for the best price obtainable in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager, in consultation with the City's financial advisor, for the sale of Che Mortgage Loans. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to notify the Trustee of the transactions approved by this Resolution and to direct the Trustee to take all actions in connection with the sale of the Mortgage Loans as may be determined necessary by the City Manager in consultation wiCh special counsel to the City, including entering into any required bailment arrangement with respect to the Mortgage Loans and sending any required notices to mortgagors and mortgage servicera. FJB170282 Section 3. Redemotion of Bonds. The City hereby authorizes the City Manager to direct the Trustee to give notice of redemption to the owners of the outstanding Bonds, and thereafter to call for redemption all outstanding Bonds as soon as practicable pursuant to the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Honda to be redeemed, together with accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption, being July 1, 1993. Section 4. MemorandLm of [Jnderstand~ng. The Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Placement Agent in aubstant Tally the form presented to this meeting is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City with such changes therein ae shall be approved by the City Manager in consultation with special counsel to the City, the execution thereof to establish conclusive evidence of such approval. Section 5. Mortgage Loan Servicer. The appointment of a successor aervicer for the servicing of the Mortgage Loans as requested by the Purchaser pursuant to the [dortgage Loan Purchase Agreement is hereby approved. The City Manager ie authorized and directed to send a notice of termination to any existing servicera of the Mortgage Loans, such termination notice to be consistent with the termination provisions of any existing servicing agreements with such se rvicea. Section 6. Serial Counsel. Hest, Beat R Krieger i9 hereby retained as special counsel to the City in connection with the sale of the Mortgage Loans, redemption of the Bonds and the other transactions contemplated by this Resolution. 2- iN Section 7. Other Acta. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Finance Director, the City Clerk and the other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all documents and papers and to perform an3 do any and all acts and things deemed necessary or convenient in order to effect the execution and delivery of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding, the ea'_e of the Mortgage Loans and the performance of any other action which may be necessary or desirable in connection therewith, or to carry out the intent or purpose of this Resolution and any such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section S. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVID) AND ADOPTED, this 16th day of Juae, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOBS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga rdetmzaz ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga -3- S1 la"1'Y UP' ICAIVUHU UUUAMUNLiA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 ' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Milli am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Millie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION NITN OEVELOPIENT OF CUP 88-46 LOCATED AT THE SOUTNNEST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED 8Y PIONEER BANK RF'C01/EIWIITION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreemertt for Installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain in connection with development of CUP 88-46, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKf~gIND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of CUP 88-46, Parkplace Cucamonga represented by James E. Carter (the developer) was required to construct stores drain facilities from Base Line Road to connect to Lhe existing Master Plan Stona Drain 1n Hellman Avenue. The storm drain facilities have been completed by the developer and accepted by the City. The developer submitted an itemized statement to the City ,{ustifying the construction costs of the Storva Drain Facilities. Staff has reviewed and verified the submittal. Parkplace Cucamonga has assigned it's rights to arly relabursement to Pioneer Bank. The amount due to the new developer is 594,985.37. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ City Engineer NJO:NY:~h RESOLUTION N0. C~~~1 _ ~~7 p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION NITN DEVELOPMENT OF CUP 88- 46 MHEREAS, the City Counc7l of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Pioneer Bank, developer, for the instsllatlon of storm drain facTiities from Base Line Road and connecting said facilities to an existing Master Pi an Storm Drain in Hellman Avenue; and NHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completeA said storm drain installation; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the time of Issuance of the building permits, has received fee credit from the drainage fees for the amount as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same 1s hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause Bald Agreement to record. BASE G /NE _ RCL40 ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~N P~PO/ECT 5/TE CUP BB - 46 ~\ , \~ ~ \~ - ~• ~~ 1 ~IW . ~e ~ EX/9T, Q 96"5.0. I~~ 'PU No SCA[f NQN~EERNQ DIVISION ~,C~ RE~It D~PA-25 GUP9B-9E nR.E: MAP EX1~IT• ~iq ~~ crrY ur' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the Ctty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS-BRINKERHOFF- AID AND DOUGLAS, INC. CO., 89-001 INTERSTATE 15 AND ~OTNILL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION ACCOUNT N0. 16- 50300 FOR DESIGN CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL DE§1GNS REQUIRED 8Y CALTRANS RECOMENDATION ge Agreement a wi thXeParsons-Bri nkerhoff~-Quai do a^d fDougtgl as ProfTht so cha^ge vwil l Increase the consultingg firm's Contract by 557,3OD to 5381,610, funded by RDA Account No. 16-5030D. On January 4, 1989, Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Quaid and Douglas was engaged by the City to prepare and submit to the City and Caltrans plans, specifications and estimates for the above stated project. Since that time, the consultant has submitted preliminary plans to the City and Caltrans for review and comment prior to request for permit to construct. The subject change order covers Caltrans requirements to modify the plans 1n accordance with the updated California Standard pplans and Specifications booklets and add new construction phasing, alignments, bridge supports, and detour plans. The consultant made the changes to the plans and specifications and resubmitted same to Caltrans in a timeiy manner. These changes were made prior to gaining approval from the City for compensation. The consultant is sensitive to the need to complete the design and get this project under construction and understands the frustration the City has experienced with Caltrans. The consultant has, with the request for this Change Order, offered to absorb all overhead costs 1n connection with this activity. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ' N1111am J. O'Neil`q.~~l/~~~-~~ City Engineer ; ~ NJO:MOay Attachment G V 1l Y VC' ICANI;ri V U U UAMUN l3A STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 TD: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ATCP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IXTENSION FOR TRACT 13114, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO, SUBMITTED BY BAYOUN DEVELOPMENT RECOMI~NDATIDN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subtect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13114 were approved by the Cfty Council on May 15, 1993, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (347,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5173,500 The developer, Bayoun Development, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement in order to secure construction financing and to proceed with the protect. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~~1~~ Y.illTam J. O'Nei City Engineer Wao:sMC:ly Attachments Ba~oun Corporation o Real Estate Developers CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. P.O. BOX 807 P.ANCY.O CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 AT.TN: STEVE GILLILAND PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II 4/27/93 RE: TRACT 13114 EXTENSION OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. DEAR SIR, DUE TO THE ECONOMIC SITU^TION AND BAYOUN CORP.'S INABILITY TO OBTAIN ANY CONSTRUCTION FINANCING, BAYOUN CORP. HAS BEEN FORCED NOT TO PROCEED WITH ANY DEVELOPMENT WORK ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED TRACT. BAYOUN CORP. IS HOPING THAT WITHIN TH6 NEXT TWELVE MONTF.S THE SITUATION WITH THE ECONOMY AND WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LENDERS WILL IMPROVE, ALLOWING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TF.E ABOVE MENTIONED TRACT TD PROCEED. BAYOUN CORP. WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A TWELVE MONTH EXTENSION ON THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE PINANCING NEEDHD TO DEVELOP TRACT 13114. THANK YOU FOR YOVR COOPERATIOPI AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL OUR OFFICE. THANK YOU. ~~~ YERIA F.. ~AAYOl1N BAYOUN CORP./PRESIDENT 1534P Howthome Blvd., Ste, 405, lowndole, CR 90P60 (P13) 679-B3PP RESOLUTION N0. 9J , ~'? / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13114 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 16 1993, by Bayoun Development as developer, for the improvement of public right--of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle dei Prado; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13114; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Ts identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension• NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~, DATE: June 16, 1993 qX T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council '~"- ~~` Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: M1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II~-~j~G SU&IECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14407, LOCATED ON THE SOUTNNEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MT. VI EN DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LENIS HOMES RECOMIEIDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and Ciry Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14407 were approved by the City Council on May 7, 1992, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Perfonwnce Bond: 5205,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5302,500 The developer, Lewis Hames, is requesting approval• of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement Tn order to complete the remaining improvements which will, 1n turn, be completed when the last 13 homes are constructed. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subml~tted, Hi111am J. O'Ne1'~ City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. 995611 9ldmdin AwnuW.e. Bog 670AIp19nq Cdryo,e98 91)85-0670 (906)865-0971 Fu: (9098894700 April 22, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-0807 Attn: Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector I~~ , - ~ '~ as„, ,, Ref.: Improvement Agreement Extension, Tr. 14407 Dear Steve: Thank yov for your letter regarding the expiration of the Improvement Agreement for Tr. 14407. Comparing the large number of units to the sales rata in this project, it is apparent that another year will ba needed to complete the houses and the associated street capping and landscaping between Trs. 14407 and 14407-1. Therefore, enclosed please find the Zmprovement Agreement Extension, in triplicate, as well as a check in the amount of $251.00 in order to process this extension request. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, LE^WIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. ~~-_. Don Thompson Terra Vista Project Manager /ksk Enclosures cc: Karen Keiser, Bond coordinator Chris Conklin, Terra Vista superintendent Central Files, Tr. 14407, Hond File RESOLUTION N0. 9_7-~3dy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY Fri TRACT 1441.7 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 16, 1993, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mt. View Drive; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and subject to the teews thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14407; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT , DATE: June 16, 1993 ?:p,. ~,. T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer eV: Steve M. GT1111and, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAR 11472, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Mep 11472 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, end it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Tn the amount of 51,100, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 511,000. BACK6RDUNl/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11472 - located on the south side of 19th Street east of Hermosa Avenue DEVELOPER: TrlCatc Industries 4737 N. Vincent Avenue Covina, CA 91722 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit (Street) S 1,100 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 511,000 Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~~ N1111am J. O'Nei~ City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachment {~. RESOLUTION N0. 9-~ ~ ~3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11472 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 11472 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~n~v ur~ xnrvutlu uuunmuaua STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 ' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, AND REDUCTION OF PERFORMANCE SECURITY FOR THE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12895, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BAKER AVENUE SOUTH OF FOOTRILL BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council accept the public improvements and also authorize a reduction of the performance bond for the private improvements for Tract 12895. Tract 12895 is located on the west side of Baker Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard and is being developed by Rancho Citiland. The Improvement Agreement and Securities for both public and private improvements were accepted by City Council an February 2, 1989. The current amount of the performance security is E430,000. The developer is requesting this amount be reduced to E118,000. At the present t1 me, the public improvements are 100% complete while the private improvements are approximately 75~ complete. It is therefore being recommended the City Council accept the required public improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and to also authorize a reduction of the performance security for the private improvements to an amount of E118,000. Developer: Rancho Citiland Development c/o Environmental Control Systems P.O. Box 5 Glendora, CA 91740 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 12895 June 16, 1993 Page 2 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Letter of Credit 5118,000 Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit y430,000 Respectfully subpri#ted, (~ Milliam J. 0'Ne~ City Engineer NJO:SNG:sd Attachment W RESOLUTION N0. 9J7 ~ ~J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT 12895 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12895 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 G"• T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: WT11tam J. O'Nei~, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPE ENTRY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE The required public improvements for the landscaped entry located on the south east corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenua have been completed in an acceptable manner, and tt Ts recommended that City Council accept said Improvements Tnto the maintained landscape system. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The landscape entry improvements is located at the south east corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~2 ~.-~-~-F Ni111am J. 0'Ne~ City Engineer ~~~111 WJO:SMG:1Y Attachment RESOLUTIGN N0. 9~i - ~3ti A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPED ENTRY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND NAYEN AVENUE. WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the landscape entry located at the soutfi east corner of Base Line Road end Haven Avenue have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted into the maintained landscape system. cl'1'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, ]993 TO: Mayor, Members of City Cowril & City Marugv FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucirula E. Fiacketi, Associate Engineer 4. 5.. KiY i •. a~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A,YNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLLrITON FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOA THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94. It is recommended that City Cowal hold the public hearing and approve the annual Engureei s Report and akached resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments wi0tin Park wd Recreation Improvement DisMct (PD-&5) for she Fiscal Year 1993/94. Fark and Recreation Improvement District was vested to provide funds m fiance Me cost of mnstrucfion, maintenance, operaflon and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Communty Park is a 40 ave facility heated w the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill CommuNty Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest comer cf Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District bowdary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucarramga with the general excepBw of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. Pursuant ro the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each yRar the City Cowcil must hold a public hearing and approve an annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the district and discloses the projected revenue and expenditures which establish the assessment rate for the nett Fiscal Year. The assessment rate increased from 535.(q to 552.00 during the 1991 /92 Fiscal Year, This rate will remain at 552.00 for the 1993/94 Fiscal Year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Single Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 350 acres 351 acres m 7.00 acres 7.01 acres W 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres ti.01 acres and Larger Assessment per Percet 552.(p E26.00 578.00 f182.00 53fa.0o 5728.00 51,3!10.00 ti ~Y Respectfully sub 'teed. Wm. Jce O'N City Engineer Attachments: Resolution Annual Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 9~' J3Cv A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-PD (HERTTAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21st day of April, 1993, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 93-090 to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No. 93-090 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on fde in the OFfirn of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and ronsidered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdicion EaMS in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: $~TjQ;,jy That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 1993/94, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 93-090 , be done and made; and SECTION 2 Be if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SESTlS2~I~ Ee it Enally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1993/94 method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD-85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~~oeao~essic~ V~ Q ~ a 3 No. 24953 ~ ~ c.o~~ i~ '~.Iif a. ~ F P Approved: William J. O' ' ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 ALifHORITY FOR REPORT This report for tite 93/94 fiscal year is prepared pursuant m the order of the City Coundl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with Ote requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 225110 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for This annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is m set forts Mdings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments b be levied according to benefit rather tiNn according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apporOOned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels N proportion to the estrmaled benefits N be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvemend." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvement is contained in the Improvemett Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 0( the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment disMct into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the impnrvemenb, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous m noncmttiguous auras. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a fax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such es a city, county, state, or the federal govemmen0 are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain user parcels used for railroad mainline rightof-way, public utility transmission nghPOf-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terca Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are rtwre particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 8S. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.Tbe construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equesMan facilities, playground equipment, pirnic facilities, athletlc facllities, and walking, y>ggmg and equestrian hails. 2.Tbe coretrucuwl of Red Hill Community Park Including, but cwt limited to, grading. planting, ircgatMan, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, weteracape, restrooms, senwr citlum fadlities, Playground equipment, pirnic fadlitles, major lighted athletic facilitl®, jogging trail, underground sarm dram system, and adjacent public street improvements. D. The assessment rate for tlse 92/93 FY is 7;!2.00, W a rate wBi not increase for the 93/94 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover Me district maintenance and operatlon expenses for the 93/91 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting AM of 1972 pemdts nrrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the folbwing final year. PmnowA Mai.. t nr~BSeet- Q~[Qq Regular Payroll $230,060 Fringe Benefits 580520 Vehicle Maint../Operations f24,00C Maintenance & Operafion9 551,100 Equipment Maintenanre (6,000 General Liability 513,Et40 Contract Servi[es 510,000 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A. Study §16,560 Water Utilities 5103,080 Electric Utilities EjQQ,Q~Q Subtotal 5636,110 Assessment Adntinishatlon and General Overhead !259,640 Taz Delirrquency 542,440 Debt Service Subrotal: 51,142,080 Cross Revenue Required: 51,778,190 less: 92/93 District Carryover <sl lss7m Assessrnad Revenue Required: 51,662,620 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the District in proportion ro the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The DisM[t is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining Hre assessments a5 follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all parrels rat defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the Cormty Assessor s computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by- the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than 55(10. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1 S acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back inro the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use Information contained in the curtmt San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing e~dstlng residenfial dwelling units and meeting the following condifions. Parcel Siu Range Number of Hxisting Res. Lhvelting Units/Parcel Less than IS acres and 151 b 35 acres and 351 m 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14A acres and t4.01 b 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & larger and i m more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 a more dwelling urdb 15 a more dwelling unib 26 a more dwelling orals Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment For Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residentlal units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase armually and will somewhat offset the anfidpafed decrease N assessments due b new devebpment Category B: All parcel not defined in Category A or Casegory C Category C: All exempt parcels as defimed below: Ali properties currently tax exempt; All public ownerships; Railroad mainline rights-of-way; Major utility transmission rights-of-way; Mineral rights; Parcels so small they currattly cannot be built upon; All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than 5500 and iS acres or less; and C. Summary n! Preliminary Assessment Amounb Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during final year 1993/41 is 552.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residen0al dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 552,(10 tlmes the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which rtay be levied for Parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1993/94 shall be acmrding b the following schedule: Definition less Oran 1S0 acres 151 acres to 350 aces 35t acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14A apes 14.01 acres to 75,0 ones 25.01 acres & larger AssessmeO Per Parcel S 26.00 S 7g.ao f 782A0 S 361.00 S 728.00 51,300.00 Category C: The assessment shall be SO.OC for Category C Parcels. PRO]ECIED 1993/94 ASSESSMENTS 23,217 Single Family Parcels 23,217 unib at 245 Multi•Family Parcels 4,749 unib at Leas than 1S0 Ares (935) Parcels 1098 unib at 15 Acres to 3.50 Anes (409 Parcels) 401 units at 3S1 Aches to 7.0 Ares (227 Parcels) 212 units at 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Ares (131 Panels) 132 units at 14.01 Aaes to 25.0 Acre (4S Parrels) 44 units at 25.01 Acres or larger (23 Parcels) ~,pO~ 29,876 urtib 552.00 = 51,207,264 (52,00 = f246,948 f 26.OD = f28,548 S 78.00 S 31,278 sisz.o9 = S 3e,s54 5364.00 = f 48,M8 5728.00 = 532,032 f1,300.00 = 524.4DQ 51,662,622 roes weaenae ~eWx® IMft +, i9P1 n +uer n w ua~ ae+9 ~, t9n re ueu a ee leed® aCt9en+ 7, 1992 09 era .u ue .. 9ream alceu a. +++¢ v++ +iasr+ u.n ec 9M+m® arau t=, +99x a u+vz m w u9in® ewe+~a u, tvR re nrx w.a9 we re +~rx +x.~ we eeeoa w9wr m, +990 c.u.r. arw ~.a rc M91O® JMIM910. 1910 n +mr u eu wreeeo rer+uer t7, t99f re +uu ~.a we 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ') STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 W Q 0 Q Z Q Q~ 0 ', /5GAL, L/OU/DA.y/BArP 9T1',PAGYFLU•4 ~i99L0~9LTO~ (ST.PEET TREFS~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA 'YO scac~ COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TAP /4Q66 exnieir •a• ASSESSMENT DIAGRs-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 N.T.S. •~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR 14644 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT ~A„ GEMIBIT 'A• aSSESSMENT DIAGkAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ,. ~.. ' ~~ 3 ~ i I A1 3 $ i lea ~ P~ ~ •,H ~ i G6 ~L 1 P° ~ 2 Q ~ i u,v ~.~ ...: ,.. / '..e Por.3- w ,' it /~ o Pn, s / ' ='= ® ~p.. ~ Louc. 4 ~ ~ ~ i " P. ~ Por. ~ POf. l 1.tt AC. e r~ - U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 89-04 Rasolutim No. 92-264 Page S •-~ AF 40'+' =1 '------ ==i =- P. M. /2 59•/ ~~~,1l d~ .. rl ,. .. .. T ~• .T i~,~K ,.~. ., ~- , ,, ~~ ~ P. M. /2959 SHEET INDEX MAP ~) .,., ^ pOUTE -~ I I. ~ ` \I (CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EP' ;INEERING DIVISION I ~ ITEM: TITLE: ~ M 12959 - I EXHIBIT: nA // V/C/N/T>' MAP /i ~SESSMEPIT DIAGF,_,M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 19TH STREET __ F N £~ 6 STREET LIGHTS - 18 STREET TREES - 110 NTS N -~-~ '~.~ -~ ~~~ `J ; ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 14192 ~, = ~~ 2, _~ Q; xl ' ~~ ;~ ~w .~ lU I - ~; i~ ; ~$~~I ~ 1: F;Io IT '„ e v`~., s~v LSL LANDSCAPE tr,AINT~NAhC~ C~STRICT NO. 3a STREET LIGiiT;Pv~Cs tJIAINTENAf~CE DISTRICT h'OS. 7 AFD o L-- -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELS 1 TFIl20UGH 8 INCLUSIVE, PARCELS 10, 11 AND PARCELS 13 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, AI.L AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 13724 RECORDED IN BOOK 169 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER Or^ THE COUf]TY OF SAN BE.RNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA GROVND COVER TURF TR'_'_5 (9.f,) IS.f.I IE~.1 PJJ'IriLL BLVD. ___ ___ 25 FQ72Hi LL (MEDIANS) 14~fl2G --- 57 eiIWANTIA AVE. __- ___ [~ v -- NT,S, - ,-~`~~, EY.HISIT A ~~~ F:Y2HILL MPiKCTPi ~r'% ~ ~~ = ~ 2I -Z i lk ~~ ~~ ~~ lU a IJIi-% ~ RTE. j-~-,_- -_ ~' i i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 9 OF PARCEL MAP 13724 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 169 OF pA.RCEL MAPS PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF T:;E CCJ:7lY RECORDER OF THE CL,^,]Ty CF SAii Bc:RC]gF9I;.:1, STATE OF CALIFYIRNIA N - ~~ . ~~ . ~. Q ~av~ ®~ ~~s~e~® ~~~~c~ac~ea~~ 11~~~ udI'i' lbE~~~~®LV~ ~Q F'!H?PIT A Ti@ PRICE CC'IP IJY LAFvDSCAPE MAIPvTEPFA;dCE DfSTRECT N6. 3a STREET LIGHTIPiG F/AIFdiEIvAPvCE DISTRICT h'OS:_7 AhD 6 ,_` _: I I i ~~ ~-------------~ Resolution No. 93-013 gage 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 c.u. P wir ~AVnI zz!-JZ. •aG~ FLr~rs 7 JlKCtt 4~ STREET ~r~~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~ONtiA COUNTY OF.SAN BERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r.t~ p 40-1A VICIMTY MOP tAMIBIT •~,• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 TRACT 13759 22 z9 30 34 3J 49 48 _. 56 / C ~ ~ 9/ 37 '~ ~ 49 55 ~` • Z W 24 17 W1. 32 3G ~ 4/ q5 ~ 50 54 3 • 1, h p~ W 23 Z6 33 ~9 35 ~ ~ 43 4~ ~~ 5/ 52 ~ 4 - - -J 5 • . 2/ 20 /9 /d /7 /Yi /S /4 /3 /2 I/ ro 9 8 7 ~ i IW ~~ LESr)iNp CITY MAINTAINED AREA6 ~ 3 • BTREET LIGHT N '~ _; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDNiO r• ,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA E%HIBIT ,A, I A! 'sESSMENT DIAGR[ A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 36 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 _ _ _ BASEL/Nf iraAn .v ----L-~...<~` -r I'~ `~ ~ i ~:.pl a ~~~~ N ^~ ,~ 1 ,,,, - 1. ----- ~ :~r.~ • , .- r _ r' /`~1 ~ J ~0,~ f `~ !AOLf) ~ ~~ "''~ ~_ aYl, v" dl m ' •~~ ~3 ~ :,~: ~ e r ~:,diF~~ X( S ` ,~~_ ,--,f ~ ~~ I~~I / U ~~ _~ ~ \ r 6. r ._ `J ~~~ ~~ VV ly ~ e~~ ~ ~ QI .; x T1`_~~, ..~~. ~_ s~ .t' \~ • ~\ or.r .. _. err--1T •r. I r ~,r ~~ 41• J r 516.4 ~ .. y ~ Prel r~ larr)~_I ~ Pu Aire ~~C~TI~.1 I ~~1-A ~l.a X1.1 ~ a I u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR41~10 ~1 ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~Rr~L MAa /438 ullr ur xArvurl~uuGArvivrvt>n ,~___;:':• STAFF REPORT DATE: ]one 16,1993 ~ ~~ TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager ~~`~~~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT'S WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94. It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year ]993/94. Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, water charges are increasing for all districts due m a rate increase by Cucamonga County Water District of 5 % for domestic and 7 % for agricultural, effective Juiy 1,1993 and another increase of 5% for domestic and 5% for agricultural effective January 1, 1994. in some districts an increase in the amount of landscape area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. In addition, some districts are accepting landscape areas into the district without annexing additional assessment units to off set the costs, In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessment below the annual assessments revenue requirements, in some disMcts this carryover no longer exists resulting in an increase in the assessment rote. The following, along with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identfies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compared with Curtest FY 92/93 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget (or each district and any carryover used M reduce rates. A tax delinquency amount is added to each disMct's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. if the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the dtshict can be added to the districts fund balance. However, if the delinquencies are as projected, various required maintenance acFvities will not have available funding which may resul! in reduced service levels. The recommended rate of 592.21 from 5'12,47 reflect increased water rates and inflation costs and the acceptance of Old Town Park, Church Street Park and the NeighMrhood Center into the District. The recommended rate of 5422.00 from 5905.30 reflects increased water rates of the dishier. LMD 82 has the largest landscape area of any disMct in the C5ty With 118.02 acres, of which 27.50 acres is parks. I and~e Mainterstnce District No.:+a - Hy~„yp The recommended rate of 5443.74 from 5393.04 reFlect the increase water rates of the district. The recommended rate of 5352.80 from 5347.08 reFlect increases in water rates to the district. l a^d~~' M ' [enance DisMct No 4 -Terra Vista The recommended rate of 525250 from 5248.24 reflects increased water rates tD the district. N addition, Fast Greenway Corridor and 1.00 acre of ground cover ,turf and shmbs were accepted into the district to F>e maintained. iaMcrar,~M 'ntenanr DisMct No L Tot Lt The recommended rate of 5713.29 from f108.78 elflecb water rote increase to the district. I aM~tp Maintenance District No 6 - rvn The recommended rate of f246.97 from f243.96 refects water rate increase to the district. I a~S~px h:ainlenwnce District Nn 7 -_North F The recommended rate of 530756 from 5305.43 reflects water rate increase to the district. The recommended rate of 5151.45 from 5150.45 re(iects water rate tnnease to Ute district Respectfully 8nbmifted, ~' C~~~ Wm. Jce O'Ne' ' City Engin Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports 91 RESOLUTION NO. 9,%3' ~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21st day of April, 1993, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 93-094 to order the therein described work in connection with the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 93-094 was duly and legally published in the time, fot'm and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the t~ffice of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: S _TION1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1993/94, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 93-094, be done and made; and SECTION 2 Be if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION ~'; Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1993/94 method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) Fiscal Year 1993/94 No. 24953 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repoli Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) The FY 93/99 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance DisMct No. 1 (LMD N]) represents 29.94 acres of landscape area and 38.25 acres of parks which are iucated at various sites throughout We City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, bur rather bene0t the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon devebpment. The various sites rtainfained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and parks. The 38.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Culch Park which is 5 aces, 20 acres of Fast and West Beryl Fark, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5 acres of Church Street Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. Old Town Park, Church Street Park and the Neighborhood Center am being added to the district this fiscal year. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92/93 %t124 Cmund Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.47 Turf 1A7 7.47 Parks 25,00 38,25 ~omm mi(y Trails ,7 Qtl ZItQ Total Area in LMD N1 54.94 Acres 68.19 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestian Mails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. Pi9j d d osf The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD Ml are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs and lbe maintenance of the parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Cantratt Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD Pl areas follows: Regular Payroll $45,060.00 Fringe Benefits $15,770.00 Maintenance and Operations $16,830.00 Vehicle Maintewnce and Operatiore $16,310.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental §1,000.00 Mileage $1,000.00 Conhact Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $236,400.00 Park Landscape Mainterance $112,010.00 Tree Maintenance $6,000.00 Athletic Light Maintenance $13,000.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A. Survey for 6 Parks $9,700.00 Touch Pad System for East & West Beryl Parks $36,000.00 Gpifal Equipment Outay $4,980.00 General Liability $7,480.00 Water Utilities $182,110.00 Electric Utilities $49570.00 Subtotal: 5753,220.00 Assessment AdmirdstraHon and General Overfrtad $113,(,60.00 Tax Delinquenty Total Revenue Required: $963,910.00 Less: 92(93 District Grryaver <$32,710.00> Assessment Revenue Required $931,2(p.00 For 93/94 the dishict budgeted 59,7110.110 for a Mandatory A.D.A.(American's wiM Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficiencies in the districts parks for A.D.A compliance. Also budgeted is an $36,000 Touch Pad System which will allow the disMCt to recover revenue from sports field light usage. Gpital Equipment Outlay of $4,980,00 is m purchase equipment for the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Analvsia: Budgeted maintenance costs for LMD M] increased from $735,290 in 92/93 to 5946,710 m 93/94. This increase can be attributed to increased maintenaru~e costs, Mandatory A.D.A. Surveys and the addition of three City Park facilities to LMD ttl. These parks will add an addi0onal 13.25 acres of maintained area to the district The increase in water rates is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water District is anticipating an average 9.5% agricultural water rate increase hrr the fiscal year, while the average increase for the domestic rate is 7SY. The FY 93/94 assessment rate is 592.21, this is a 819.74 increase over FY 92/93 which was 572.47. 7'he following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ Single Family Parcel 8,034 592.21 1.0 E92.21 8740,810 Multi-Family Farrel 4,129 892.21 0.5 546.11 ElffiaYS2 Totals $931,200 6 L7 y, O E~ ~ ~ U O ~ U 6 U O Z y L O 7. W V ~ ~ O ~ ?^ 6 H C/] U p6p R Q ^ f11 O hL^ LMO 1 AMMENATIDNS ANMENED AggIL i, 1992 iR ti<86 35 AU ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1992 TR )4644 R AV AMNEMEO Dcsob~r 22, :992 iR 14792 79 AU ANMENED JANVART 20, 199} tR 73759 56 AU EXHIBIT •p• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE NOAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Q D Q Q ~~ 6 EA• i5GAL. [~DU.iDAtif9.4iP srY.P~4uF[U,9 ~i94[a~1LraJ ~ST.PEET TREES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA No sca~~ _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ` ~ TAP ; 4QB6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRs-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 n~.r.s. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ., COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~r - ~ I4644 4n\~ a STATE OF CALIFORNIA E%HIBIT "A" ~. / /i .SESSMEPlT DI~-GFi_.hA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 I~~~ ~`I I4 ¢2 ~] 4: 19TH STREET _ NTS STREET LIGHTS - 18 STREET TREES - 110 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~„~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~, lai~z tAf11B1T •A• 4SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 TRACT 13759 ZZ 29 30 >,4 .3"~ 47 48 56 ~ I / C ~ .B 9i 37 ~ !~ 49 55 ~ ~ Z Z4 27 ~ I, 32 36 ~ 4/ yy ~ ,Sp cJ4 ~ h ~q, ~ 3 Z3 26 33 a9 35 ~ 93 ¢i I~ 5/ 52 5~ 4 -~- _j 5 2/ ZO /9 /8 /7 /fe /5 /Q /3 /2 r/ R7 9 G 7 6 I~ LEGEND CITY MAINTAINED AREAS W J • STREET LIGHT N F. _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCf-MONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDNIO ,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA a„IBIT-,A~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community? Fiscal Year 93194 The Fl' 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared m compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD p2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for [his disMct are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, Community Trails and parks. The 27S acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. The breakdown of matnfahted areas is as follows: 42!93 Y3L~ Gmund Cover and Shrubs 45.2tl 47.99 Turf 3853 40-13 Parks 27.50 2750 Total Area in LMD M2 114.31 Ades 118.62 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are rtuintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD M2 are for dirttY maintenance of mrf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Conhact Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD M2 are as follows: Regular Payroll $269,770.00 Part Time Salaries ¢,650,00 Fringe Benefits $94,420.00 Maintenance and Operations $g1~3pp,p0 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $10,000.00 Mileage $340.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance 5568,870.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory ADA Survey $4,4pp.(p Mandatory ADA Implementation $25,280.00 Various Rennva0ons m All Four District Parks $60,520.00 Renovations to Etiw~anda Trail $%,000,(p Landscape Rerwvatron to Contract Maint.. Areas E90,270.W CapiUl Equipment Outlay SZ7S50.00 General Liability $12,330.00 Water Utilities $455,700.00 Electric Utilities W Subtotal: 51,782,340.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $136,210.00 Tax Delinquency 5165.d80.110 5301,690.00 Total Revenue Required: $2,084,030.0[1 Less: 92/93 Distdct Carryover <c37R 100 (l[I> Assessrnt Revenue Required $1,705,930.00 For FY 93/94, the district budgeted 54,4110 for a Mandatory A.G.A (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficiencies in the districts parks (or A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is 525,200 for Mandatory A.D.A Implementation in Kenyon and Vintage Parks, Various renovations to the four District parks for 560,520 include replacing the tot lot deck, replacing the concrete hail fence with PVC and repainting the steel fence at Windrows Park, construct retaining wall at Vintage Park, and regain( basketball courts at all four parks. Renovations to Efiwanda Trail for f%,0110 reconstructing curb and correcting the drainage problem on the trail. Landscape renovation for 590,270 include replacing trees, shrubs and ground cover at various median island and parkway siK.-a. Capital Equipment Outlay of $27,550 is to purchase equipment (or the Park Maintm~ance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Alti)x91@+ In FY 92/93, the Assessment rate for LMD M2 was 5405.30, this rate will increase to 5422.00 for the 93/94 FY. This increase is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water District is anticipating an average 9a% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average increase for the domestlc race is 75%. There were no new assessments uNts added to the dishict this year. FY 93/94 A ~°- m t R t en a The following itemizes the assessment rate (oc the dishict Unit No. of ImdLse Tyne Ilnaa ~e Unit Rale/ Factx I en Single Family Parcel 3,7(.9.00 8422.00 1.0 §422.00 51,567,990 Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 8422.00 1.0 8422.00 852,330 Commerrial Acre 15.74 8422.00 2.0 8644.00 813,280 Vacant Acre q~,QQ $422.00 0.25 81(15.50 L773~4 TOTALS 4,400.74 1 78 , 05.930 ~~ O F. ~ ~ C p U '~' V ~ Z U O.. (s., 6~ d .--7 7, W U G-, W O z F V~j U A ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1993/94 QµCFESS/~ `~Q~9 ~ 5 ~f9 C~Sr ~'D~F' ¢, Fp 3 No.'2495,3 ~ ~ ~ ~.~~ ,^~ ~P Approved: cnuFo William J. O'N ' ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Arcnuai Engineer's Report Landsnpe Maintenance Diatrid No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Fi~eN Yeae 9a/el The FY 92/93 acmual report for tandxape Maintenance Dbtrkt No. 3a (Hyssop Msinfaunoe D'utrict) is prepared m rnmpliance with Uce requirecnenb of ANck 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 or the Streeb and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and [lghtbsg Act of 1972). Had~niL• [acdxape Mainrecurce D'utrict No. 3a (IMD a3a) represems a landscape parkway on HS'saoP Drive south of Sixth Secret The sits b usaclated vrith an area svitlJn tlut district and u such any benefit derived from ote landscape Wtalhtion can be directly attributed b Utose purely within slut disMCt Becetne of this, asrtlsstielb reipdced for Uds dbtrkt are cturged to thox petceb within dut districR The breakdown of malntahted aces b as follows: 42LSt Sil31 Graced Cova std Siwbs 0.14 0.14 Turf 0.00 O,m Total Mee in IMD K1a 0.14 Arm 0.14 Aso The ground rover and shruM cress are maintairod wrier contract by a private Wdenpe maineataKe company. The majority of the budgeted aeab for i.MD AOa ate for direct eukttb+asica of ground cover and shncba. Thee functlons, along witlt tree maicstenanca std «chln ircigatlon system repair and testing are pertormsd tltrough a Contras Services Agrtiersiatt the Clty hu wieh a private landscape malneeuctce company. The projected cosh b operate and maintain LMD a3a are o follows: Regular Payroll (30.00 Fringe Nerefib f10.00 Mainbnance and Operstiau 6390.00 Vehkle Maintenance and Operatlons 60.00 Contract Services landxape and Tree Mainemanre 51,830.00 Capita Eepetditura landscape Plant Maeerial Remvatiau 6600.(q Moisture Sensor & Cantrotler Fiicloaure Wblletbro 65,040.00 General Liability f40.00 Water Utilities 6870.00 Electric Utilities ,j]j0,0Q Subtotal: 68,930.(q Aasessmen Adminisbation and Genenl Overlsad Sz9o.00 Tae Ikiinqueicy ;Q,QQ Graces Reveme Required: 59,220.00 ieaa: 92/93 Distrkt CarrYave <ss_97n.ntr, Total Revenue Required: (3,310.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted f400.011 landscape plant rrrterlal rerovatlon and fS,010A0 (or Moisture Senor and controller enclosure WhW tloro. IVo vehkle a equipment purduau are budgetedfor br 917/94. AOalyJ11: In fhe FY 92/93 the uxsamett n4 tar I.MD i3a wu 6393A1/A.U. Thb will Incrase N 6413.74 for Ute FY 93/94 m coves the eumart maintenance web of the dbtriet and Urc antlNpated average 9S% agricullunl and the average 73% danestle water me increaeee. This reprcxnb an innate of 5.227E over IaN Neal year. No rsew aeammtrrb were anrczed into the dbtrict thie year. The following ilerrdaet the ateesemed n4 for dte dbMtt Unit gate/, lard Use '[ypt lJnits Rar Pacer r ...~ IndusMal Parcel 8 6113.74 3.0 6413.74 f.4 10.00 6 z ~" o z ~ ~ 6 p U ['") O Z o z x U R: ~ ¢ _ U G=-. f~0 O 2 Y^ d H C/] U ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City City of Rancho Cucamonga Annwl Eng;neer'a Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (CommerciaUlndnstrlal Maintenance District) Ft~ alp Y_~~r 94/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for lydreape Maintenance Dielrkt No. 36 (t:omnrerdal/hdwtrW Maintenance Diavkt) is pmpued in mmpliarce wish the rquLemenb of Artlcle 4, ~up4r 1, DivWon s of the StmNS acd Fltghwaye Cade, State of Catifomia (l.odreape and L'ghting Act of 1972). 9arltplmod: Landscape Maintenance D4diet No. 36 (LMD N36) repteaenb IWecape ants tlwughout the ConmteccLl/IndwtrW Matnteunee Dtatrld Thee site ace ataociaasd with area within that dufrfct and as each any benegt detlvtd from the Iudteape InstaWeon wn pe directly attributed m throe parcda within tlut dbhiet Broaur of fhb, aasaanreib required for this dtstrit are charged m those parotL withbt flat dletrict The brrakdown of wlntatned wren b u (olbvrs: ~LSi SiL4! Gcoud Coverand Shrubs 5.95 674 Turf yZq y~ Total Arc in LMD N36 924 Acs 10.03 Arns ~~ cover std shmM anu are maintained ardor contract by • private Iandaape PW7'• The myodly of tM budgatad aoW for LMD Nap are for dltect mainteurtce of tort, ground cover acd atwbe. TMa turcfioria, along with trw cttalntarYM and oechin irrigatbn syalen repair and taWtg an peddtnted tlnwgh a Contract Services Agteected fM Ciry luu with ^ private lanclecape mabmerrrn company. A portion of dte budgerd mob are for the rtWnpcuctce for the median Wang and parkways on Mltlikan Avenue touted wufh of Jersey Blvd at tht Gradt Separation for the Atchison, Topeka and Sand Pa Railroad. The ptvjecbed cwu b operatr and ttaWtain LMD Nab are o follows: Regalar rayrou st,94o.09 Fringe Benef'ib (680,00 Mainltauare and Opmtrona ('7,700.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Opetadoro f1,030A0 Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental 51,000.00 Contract Servim Lardacape MaintenanQ 5136,050.00 Tree Maintenance (26,500.00 Capihl F.xpeditures lydgatian Upgrade b Central Control f58,S00.00 I~ndeupe 1'Ynt Material Rarovatlan f12,000A0 MWiken Ave. l.adaape RdubWktian f155,680A0 Capita", Fquipmene Outlay / Veltide 520,0110.00 General IJabBity 52540.00 wakr ut;une. 542,830.00 ~ectric UtiBtiee ;gp$p,pQ sabtokl: w6a7o.0o Aaaewtnmt AamWatntlan and Geed Overlrad 529,180A0 Tax I)dbq~wKy ~' jQ,QQ Subbbl: f84,790A0 Grow Revemw Requfed: 5561,ttAA0 Lao: 92/93 Dbtrkt Canyova 61{9 nn.ana Told Revenue Required: 1S4 1,890 .00 In the FY 92/90 the aseeament ra4 for I.MD pb two f317A8/A.U.,tlda wW h~ee b (35280 fa Uro FY 93/91. 'Ihb letneue b due b the fact Uut Cucamonga County Water INaMCt hn impkn~ted m avenge 9.5% agtlcultuN wabr wk inQewa (m do Rant year, whlk the average intavee far the domstle rak k 7.57L. 49.58 aeeewtttatt uNb have beat added b tla dbMCt thin year. The foBowMg Ileatiau 0te aaeewntan nk for the dbtekb Unit No. of Araea. Unlt 1MUatrial/COmm Acn 1167,18 5352.80 1.0 535280 ~$QQ Tokb H11.890 c'~ E--~ U E--~ U :~ ~~ W U ~---~ z ,_ c F 5s a o o L' -m t-'oz ~ Gi O U 0.,. ,,~~ z~~ ~xt~ a ~ z H ~ v ~~ ~ ~ ~~ >. AMMFIGTI9IH AMMEXED OCTOeu 7, 1992 oe eva .a3 K AM9FMED aCTOeEe 7, 1902 9M 12959-1 te.27 K AMYEXFD M9+1!1~[e 1e, 1992 9M /17N 10.29 K AM9EIIED DERI~EI! 2, 100! iM 1772 12.3 K AM9EMED JAMYMT 20, 7991 c.u.r. m-Te l.De K AMIRI~ iENUYT 17, 1991 rit rate :.a K EXHIBIT 'q• nSSESSMENT DIAGkAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 -- ----- --- J ,> >. ' 1~~ 3 ~ bp i as PM" $ ' N ~~'Z Per.4 ° ~+ ~9 i W 4 u.v err u a Por. 3i ° r 61 i ~~ ° POI. S 1 =sa_ j~ ~ 1.01 AC. 4 d" ` ~ I ~ p vac' Def. I Lu +c. -NfHET~- STREET-•' ~ r - °~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ - STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 89-04 n ~ Gggow gOUTE PM /2 59-/ /i/ ~,~ ey I I ' .. ,. ~ ~ ,> i ~ n a~~` ` O / 1 T _' I r~ ~Y ~ _ PM /2959 - I SNFET INDEX h'!P ni5 ~/ ^ _~ ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: EM ,iNEERING DIVISION ,~.~' TITLE: + M i7_9~ 9- I EXHIBIT: ~~/ Y/4N/TY NA` U; FI16 i ' A' ~'~ z' `~I j UI ~ I EI r~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STRF_T LIGIiTING R~AINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~ AND 6 PARCELS 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, PARCELS 10, 11 AND PARCELS 13 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, ALL AS SHCAfi7 ON PARCEL MAp 13724 RECORDED IN BOOK 164 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA GROUHO COVER TURF TRESS 14.F.1 IS.F.1 IE1,1 FIX7:'HILL (MEOL4VS) 14,826 --- 57 ET I'vi~L~DA AVE. ___ ___ y Cea U H ©~ G'11 LW 1~' Cra~® 6r LLd ~/~dhW ®G'i1 ~AN f`%~ .~ 7r~~~ ~ ~ ~®a.DlA7~'V ~~ ~~a~~ r~~s~~~~mau~® lIA 'r ~r: 4y ^r. ~ ~ EXHIBIT A ~~ FmPHILL 11ARKETBr C[ ~ _. _ .. 7....~ 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EY...u~ l 'P,' - LANDSCAPE RPAINTENA~dCE DIS T RlCT N6. 3E STREET LIGHTING PfiAl[dTEW,aNC CISTRiCT NOS:_i AND 6 ._.., )~ 1 'i a 1 ~' ,, ,~ ~~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ~_,i;~.: i ~,! ~' I4' J_ f2TE - i ~i ~ _- ~. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 9 OF PARCEL NAP 13724 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN 9CX1K 164 OF PAP,CEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THROUGR 107 INCWSIVE, IN T9E OFFICE OF TEE CCJ:ITY RECORDER OF TY.E WL'JTY C•_° SAN 2ERCJAPJZi:Or STF,TE OF CAL IE`ORNIA ~~ Y H ®P ~b+i QV \La C"li® Y.e 4N tl.vQ 4W~~~W ~. C~ ~ ;~ ~xararT A - ~ u~~~ ~E` ~~~~~'®~~Lw Tria PRIGe cc»PANY v - _ ___ - exHm~r •~• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~/I-N 227 .2Yi-O~~ ~.etlt 7 ~" 4 i F Z a Arecac • +~ STREET N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO . ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~, c en.ra VICIN~TV MAP A! 3ESSMENT DIAGRI A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ', (~ I l~ ~ P ~ N lei -'~ ~ BASEL/NE Ro,rn 9. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARQINO ~- ; STATE OF CALIFORNIA P,e~~ MAP /43/B Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 c~Q~oQ ~oressio,~~F ~ ~~~ ~, \ 3 No. 24953 ~ 2~~ I 1i~ c.o. •3/• 3 ~ ~ s P Approved: ~ a illiam J. O'N ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 93198 The FY 93(94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 's~6ta'"'j° Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD p4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that disMct and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median i9lands, Street trees, paseos and parks. there was one acre of maintained area added to the disMct this year, the breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92[93 %tL44 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.27 8.35 Turf 6.62 6.SH Parks y,pp 2Z0Q Total Area in LMD M4 40.89 Acres 41.89 Ayes The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. P1VjeCfEdS49ffi; The majority n( the budgeted costs for LMD Ito are (or direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These (unctions, along with hee atintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for Fast Greenway Corridor, which is starts on the east side of Milliken Avenue, just north of Milliken Park and nrns easterly to Terra Vista Parkway East This maintenance area will be added m the district tltis fiscal year. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD k4 are as follows Regular Payroll $260,09U.00 Part lime Salaries $4,(x5p,00 Fcinge Benefits $91,030.00 Maintenance and Operations $41,050.00 Mileage $2gp,Op Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $30,000,00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services landscape Maintenance $191,310.00 Tree Maintenance $2,000.00 Capital Expenditures Repaint Basketball Courts 4; District Parks $4,320.00 Exercise Station Replacements $17,280.00 Tetta Vista /Base Line Median Renovation $413,780.00 Milliken Park Expansion: Expand Ex. Parking Lot $%,000.00 Expand Ex. Ballfield & Add Sports Lights §120,000.00 Mandatory A.D.A Study for DisMct Parks f14,600.(q Capital Outlay /Equipment §22,750.00 General Liability $5,090.00' Water Utilities §130,930.00 Electric Utilities SZ3.150.00 Subtotal: $1,469,290.0(1 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $89,140.00 Tax Delinquenty 50.00 Gross Revenue Required: f1S5A,430.00 less: 92/93 District Carryover _ <f524.690,QpZ Total Revenue Required: $1,033,740.00 Por 93/94 the disrict budgeted $14,600 for a Mandatory A.D.A. (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficiencies in the district's parks for A.DA. compliance. Also budgeted for the district's parks is $4,320 to repaint basketball courts and $17,280 for exercise station replacements at Coyote Canyon and Spruce Parks. The Milliken Park Expansion includes expanding the existing parking lot to add Z5 parking stalls for $%,000 and expanding the existing 60' ball field to a 90' field and insglling sports field lighting and a Touch Pad System for $]20,00!1. There is f413,780 budgeted for Ote Terra Vista Parkway/ Base Line Rnad Median Renovation and $22,750 budgeted for the purchase of equipment for Hre Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. 4Di13'Hl@: In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD k4 was 24A.24/A.U., this will increase to $252.50/A.U. for the FY 93/94. this increase is due to [he fact That Cucamonga County Water Distric is anticipating an average 9.5% agricultural water rate increase (or the (fiscal year and an average increase for the domestic rare of 7.5%. 357 new assessments units were annexed to the district this year. Attached is the Assessment bate Computation Chart. 1Y 93/94 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMct Unit No. of Rate/. Single Family Parcel 1934.00 $25250 $488,340 Multi Parcel 2215.00 $222.00 $491,730 Commercial Acre 137.2] $382.99 552,550 Vacant Acre 30.14 537.12 SL120 1~fl33 740 ~ ,_ zo E- ~~ 6 p U U V O 2 ~ Q D U R.' G^, (Y. W U ~+ ~ O z ~ g .~.t~a. ,~~~ ,. ,~ TucT few ~, MI ~.~~ ,, ,~ r..cr ,uv. u.re w ~wiouc M,,. 6. 1w[ ni tua~-~ n w ASS6SSNHNT DIn.nAN ~ LAHDSCAPH MAIHi6HAHCS DISTHICi H0. ~ \\~. TRACT N0. 14365 ~~~.~ a ~µ; , . i ` .' ~; v \ ` ~' p I li ~. ;; it ,; ti ~,~~ . .._~ ,r...., t-~~ ~ nt /. 1r ft 1 w ... .d JI _ . ~ 1~ i~ •N~~H STREET TI1EE5 II ® CITY GINTAINED ARGS ~~ STREET LICN75 ----•------ 15 G, ~~ E%HIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TRi44~7sH ,~ STATE OE CALIRORNIA exnimr •A• ~n G %/' LAN 83CA~ ES ANNE MA ~EAGRR CT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 BASE LINE ROAD -T - /~~ ~ j \ F i i 1 ,i ,, I 4;I ST TREE EASEMEiyT i~ N, T, ter-', CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR/44075h: ~ STATE OR CALIFORNIA E%NIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET IIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 4 BASS L/NE .POA/J ~' ADDISON STREET & GRAPEVYNE STREET , ,I (lBAC! ir0. 14401 - Iw SrReEr rh'EE EASEMENrs ~ o ~~ ~ GRAPEVINE STRSL'P 7 ~ Z 1 ~` ` ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ A ~ O 3TR~S0^. f ~u,rs. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA C~ -- Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) Approved: Fiscal Year 1993/94 William J. Oji~il, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance DisbicU Fiwl Year 93194 The p1f 93/91 srmual report for Landxape Mamtmence District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenances District) it prepared N complance svitlr the requiremmb of Ardck 4, Chapav 1, Division 5 0[ the Street end Highways Code, Sate of Califomie (Lsndaope and Lighting Act of 1972). lladc~anad: landxape Mainleunce Distrkt No. S (LMD MS) reproerb a landsoped Tot Lot ,looted on the soulhwnt miner of Andover Pas acct lledlord Drive. 7ha age b assodated with a fPWP of M shrgle family parcda which all love ^ common wage of the Tot Lot such that arty Mdit derived from the lardsoping orn be directly aaributed to these psrtkuar parcels. Heoua of this, aaxamenb squired for this dalrkt are durged b lMse spedflc paraeb. Thes u only one sib mavrbtrrd ty the dbtriR it mndtb of a Tot Lot and a salt amount of shrbs beds and ground cover. The quantftaa of mainahud arm aortal oF. 92LS1 81141 GrosmdCwer and ShnrM 0.33 0.33 Tool Asa in I1dD e5 0.33 Acres 0.33 Acm The gmwd rover and shrubs arcs as nWnained urdar contract by a privab Wd+oPe meinterunce comparry. The majority of the budgead mob car LMD us are car daect maintenance of grwnd rover and shrubs. Theo functlans, abrng with tree mainfmarnae and eerain irrigation sysbm repair and bating as performed through a Contract Servka Agreerrnent tlne City ha with • pnvas ardsope rtrfnterrnn company. The projected cab m opera acct mainain I.MD eS as a fo0ows: Regular Payroll 580.00 Fringe Betefib f30.00 Mam~rurtce and Operations f500.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operatlau 570.00 Contract Services [andstape Mainta+ance 51,060.00 Capital Ezpendimra Mandamry A.D.A Survey for Tot lot 51,100.00 Irrigation Upgradm m Replace Risen w/Pop Ups f1,200.00 landsnpe Material Renovatlon 5600.00 [mgatlon Upgrades m Cenrai Control 55,420.00 General Liability 530.00 Water UtiliHn 5280.00 ElecMC Utilities S33D.QII Submtal: 510,500.00 Aasasment Administration and General Overhead (610.00 DeFbquenry Contln®erry (11.04 Gtosa Revenue Requitd: f11,130.002 I.oa: 92/7.1 D'utrktCurywer c56.t30.fMA Tobl Revetw Required: f4.980.00 For 93/94 the dbtrict budgeted S1,lODAO fa • Mandamry A.D.A (Amerinn'a with Diaab0ities Act) Survey. This Survey b ngdred m evalwte deign defidendea N the tot lot for A.D.A compliance. Abo budgeted is (1300 for'ucigalfon upgndo m nplaae rixn w pop up herds, (600 for landanpe material renovatlon and fSA20 for Centel Conwl irtigatlort upgndea. ~Jd N the FY 92/93 the aaxaamett rate for I.MD itS svu f10&78/A.U.,Wa wW inctsx m 5113.29 mr the FY 93/94 m cover the avenge 9S% agrkulmnl and the 7S% domntle rate btaeax in water noes that is antlNpaled ftortt the Cutamon® County Water D4ttlct No new asaesame+t unib wen artrtor[d inm the dis[dct tltM ysr. The m1lowMg iteMUa the ataeaameit rate for the dlsMct Unit No. of Single Family Parcel 44 (11339 1.0 w _~ z ~" o F, ~~ ~~ '' ° z o z r~ v a c.._°~ a a v w ~. w 0 ~~ E-- ~ ~g~ ~~,~~. fF~6# Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 No. 24953 Approved: J. Q'fji~il, Gty Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report landscape Maintenance Distrito No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiacal Year 93/99 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). landscape Maintenance District No. b (LMD M6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated wiM areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that disMct. Because of this, assessments required for this disMct are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street heel and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 42!31 83!44 Ground Cover ared Shmbs 12.09 12.09 Turf 2.89 2.89 Community Trails 1,p0 1.IX1 Total Area in LMD Nb 17$9 Acres i7$9 Aces The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under conhact by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD X6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with hee maintenance and certain imigaHOn system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has witlt a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs M operate and maintain LMD M6 are as follows: Regular Payroll $7,7900.00 Fringe Benefits 52,730.00 Maintenance and Operations $5,5100.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 81,910.00 Contract Services Landuape Maintenance 5165,250.00 Tree Ma'vdenance 55,000.00 Capital Expenditures Irrigation Upgrades to Cenhal Control 5154,680.00 Landuape Plant Material Renovation 513,500.00 Capital Outlay/Equipment 51,500.00 General Liability 52,730.00 Water Utilities 565,100.00 Electric Utili0es S2azB.(IQ Subtotal: y428,750.0U Assessment Adminishation and General Overhead 526,870.00 Tax Delinquency S15.S6'lQ,IlQ Subtotal: 541,900.00 Gross Revenue Required: 5470,650.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ < t181.69(111(1> Total Revenue Required: f288.960.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted f154,680 for irrigation upgrades to Central Control and $13,SW for Ianduape plant material renovation. The funds for this rer!ova0on come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. Equipment purchases of f1,5W are budgeted for in 93/94. ANIyriBl In the FY 92/93 Ne assessment rate for LMD 86 was 5243.%/A.U., this will increase to $246.97/A.U, for the FY 93/94 to rover the anticipated 9S% agricultural and the 7S% domestic water rate increases from C.C~W.D. fn the district. No new assessments units were annexed into the district this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. Iarcl Use Ty$>~, I lnik Rate F+tian AU Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 f246.97 1.0 5246.97 5288.960.110 z >' o z 6 p U ~ U 6 U O ~ ~ L O ~ L1~ C6.> r=. C~ 0 z ~ ~ F V] U ffi~ fi ~ gg D~ R R ~ S Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ru. zassa Approved: Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Ficc I Vear 9/94 The FY 93/99 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Flannel Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Divisior 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). R_ac4~o.~.,...1• Landscape Maintenance DisMct No. 6 (LMD N6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Pla; aced Community. These sites are associated wiM areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that dishict. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The varous landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: ~ ~ Ground Cover and Shrubs 12.09 12.09 Turf 2.89 2.89 Community Trails 3.QQ g,(~ Total Area in LMD M6 17.89 Acres 17.89 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD IK are fur direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irtigaMon system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with :. private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD kG are as follows: Regular Payroll $7,7900.00 Fringe Benefits $2,730.00 Maintenance and Operatons $5,5100.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,910.00 Conhact Services Landscape Maintenance f11~5,250.00 Tree Maintenance §5,000,00 Capital Expenditures Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control f159,G60.00 landscape Plant Material Renovation $13,500.00 Capital Outlay/Equipment $1,500.00 General Liability $2,730.00 Water Utilities $65,100.00 Electric Utilities SS.Se0.Sl0 Subtotal: $428,750.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $26,870.00 Tax Delinquency f1 SubtotaL• $41,900.00 Gross Revenue Required: 5470,650.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ < f181.690.00> Total Revenue Required: E288.960.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted f154,G90 for irrigation upgrades M Cenhal Control and $73,500 for landscape plant material renovafion. The funds for [kris renovafion come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. Equipment purchases of $1,500 are budgeted for in 93/94. ANIyBL; In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD A6 was $243.%/A.U., this will increase to f246.97/A.U. for the FY 93/94 ro rover the anticipated 95% agricultural and the 7S9o domesfic water rate increases from C.C.W.D. ro the district. No new assessments units were annexed into the dishier this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMct Unit No. of Rate/. lad Use Type [Crib $ale_ Parlor AU Revenue Single Family Parcel 7,170.00 $246.97 1.0 f246.S7 288960.00 ~--~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Qi W 2 ~--~ ~ ,_ O H ~ z 6 p .'U- U ~ U O Z U ~-. a C+U W C:. W o z ~~ H ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~Q,°e ios si°,~~ c? ~"M H° ~m x; ~' No. 24953 ~p ~ E.o/ •3/•93 Approved: ~ ~ serf ~ oP~°" William J. eil, City Engineer i City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fiscal Year 9'+M4 The F1' 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirem¢nfs of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and highways Code, State of California (Landxape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landxape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD k7) represents landcape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that disfritt and as such any benefit derived from the Iandxape installahton can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of tlris, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landcape sites in the Etiwanda North area Heat are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Communiy Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 72191 91L49 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.46 7S4 Turf 3S5 4.02 Community Trails 2.OQ 2.OQ Total Area in LMD M7 13.01 Acres 1356 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The maprity of the budgeted costs for LMD N7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with hee maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Conhact Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD k7 are as follows: Regular Payroll 52,590.00 Fringe Benefits 5910.00 Mainleriarrce and Operations 510,690.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 51,330.00 Emergency Qc Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental f500,W Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance 5137,490.00 Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations S30,OOO.W Weed Abatement for N.E. Community Park Site 56,000.00 Capital Outlay /Equipment 5160.00 General Liability (1,930.00 Water Utilities (17,470.00 Electric Utilities X40,00 Subtotal: (209,810.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead (24,680.00 Tax Delinquency 545.160.00 Subtotal: (69,840.00 Gross Revenue Required: 5279,(50.00 Add: Pdor Year Fund De0cit _ S73A10.00 Total Revenue Required: (303,060.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted 530,0(10 for landscape plant matedal renovation and 56,000 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site. There is 5160 for equipment purchases budgeted for in 93/94. The tax delinquency in an amount of f45,OB0.IXl, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. A..alvaie: [n the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for I.MD 717 was 5305.43/A.U.,this will increase to (307.05 for the FY 93/94 to cover fhe anticipated 9S% agricultural and the 7S% domestic rate increases in water rates from Cucamonga County Water District. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMct Unit No. of Rate/. IBd Use Type lJnits ate Factor A.U Raven e Single Family Parcel 987.00 5307.05 1.0 (307.05 (3(13,060.00 E--~ ~--~ H ~, CL" ~T~ ~~ ~~ C, ~~ U~ r--~ z ~ ~ z 6 p U U ~Oy ~ A O ~ W V O W Y+ 6 F V] w ~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~PppOFESSlgy¢ `.,PP )OS H ..ry p~`JP 02~~~1 3 N~o~. .'953 ~ ` 'K E~o~ 3/ ~i3 *'I si V Approved: William J. O'N ity Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) Fiscal Vear 9zl94 The FY 93/94 annum capon for Landscape Maintenance District Nog (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD pg) represents landscape sites throughout the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the lartdscape installation can 6e directly attributed to those parcels within that district Because of this, assessments required for tltu district ere charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the disMct consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 42L43 g+L44 Ground Cover and SFvubs 0.23 0.23 Turf 0.06 0.06 Community Trails l1.OQ ppQ Total Area in LMD p8 0.29 Acres 029 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under conhact by a private landscape maintenance comparry, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD p8 are (or direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These (unctions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has wi0~ a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs m operate and maintain LMD p8 are as follows: Regular Pa1~ro11 540.00 Fringe Benefits 510.00 Matnterance and Operations 5890.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 5370.00 Contingency Tree Replacement 50.00 Conhact Services $9850.00 Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation 51,200.00 Irtigation Upgrades to Cenhal Control 54,700.00 Capital Outlay /Equipment SS760.00 General Liability 5140.00 Water Utilities 5770.00 Electric Utilities fH9,QQ Subtotal: $18,210.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead f1,80D.00 l7etinquency Contngenry 51011.QP Subtotal: 51,900.00 Gmss Revenue Required: f20,t10.00 less: 92/931)istdct Carryover _ <<3.760.00> Total Rwenue Required: 576,350.W For 93/94 the district budgeted f1,200.00 for plant renovation and (4,700 for irrigation upgrades to Central Control as capital improvement projects, a portion of these funds ere carryover hom last Oscal year's district budget. Equipment purchases of 5760 are budgeted for in 93/94. The tax delinquency in an amount of 5100.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. in the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD NB was S150A$/A.U.,fhis rate will increase to 5151.45 for the FY 93/94. This increase in the asaesattKmt rate is needed to cover the average 8.5% increase in water rates tiwt are anticipated from Cucamonga County Wafer 1)isMct to the district. T1re following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMct: Unit No. of Rate/. lad U~ Tvce Units Ram Fackx Ajj~ Revenue Single Family Parcel 108.00 f151.45 1.0 f151.45 16 .00 ~~ E--~ ~-. ~~ .~ ~-7 ~~ ~~ w cam, 6 ~ ~ U C V U p Z ~' !Y+ Li. 0.6~.~U W Gam.. ~ o z cQn ~ ~ ~~ a I ~ ~ ~Tt x Or ts.vlvt;nu uuunrntnvt;n ST~iFF REPORT DATE: June 16,1993 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Coevals E. Hackett, Associate Engineer <; ; a ~" `r. ,\,,. SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE TFiE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR TFiE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMEMS N7f1-UN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2,3,95.6,7, AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/934 It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing Nte assessment rates for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and R. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is an itemized analysis nn a district by district basis. To summarize, electricity charges are expected to decrease for all districts, due to a projected rate decrease by Southern California Edison of 3.]%. Even though the Edison rates are being reduced this budget year, the assessment rates are being increased to cover the actual costs of the districts. In prior years State Cas Tax Funds were used ro subsidize the disMcts and artificially keep assessment rates low. By increasing the rates shown in each Preliminary Engineer's Report, the disMct will be able ro stand on its own without additional funding from other sources. fn some disMcts there is an increase in the number of sheet lights being maintained which also affects the assessment rate. Edison charges for haffic signals are also included in Me applicable disMcts. ro addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, which in prior years were paid by State Gas Tax funds, will also be home by the applicable districts In past years any available prior year carryover was used ro keep assessmmts below the annual assessment revenue requirements. In some districts this carryover no longer exists resulting N an increase in the assessment rate. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Annual Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compared with current FY 92/93 rates and justification for those propossd rates. The Annual Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each distdct and any carryover used to reduce rates. $(cgt j jghtjp~ jyjyintenance Djajd(j [Jp, l _ AitCtiil An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from E13.RI to E17.77 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This is primarily due to an increase in Electric Utilihea coats previously home by State Gas Tax funds. 154 bhiit l.ilthhtiag Maintenance 12itG7ct li. p, Z: JACdJ An assessment increase is recommsnded in this district from 529.30 to $39.97 for Fiual Year 1993/94. Electricity costs increased over $90,000 m a projected annual cost of over 5200,000, this is due to the fact that General Fund and State Gas Tax funds have subsidized the district in past years. 51Ciit Lf8h1717g Maintenance j2jslpc(jjQ,g=Victoria p]appgj Co_ mm~n~ty An assessment increase is recommended N this district, from 529.74 to E45.15 !or Fiual Year 1993/94. This increase is due to a projected increase m elechirity costs which were subsidized by State Gas Tax funds N past years and a lack of prior year carryovers. sole[ Jrghtiog Mai¢t~ance Bistlict No.4 -Tina y;sta Claauid Community An assessment increase is recommended in this district from 527.72 to 529.% for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior year carryover funds will sfill be used to keep the rate Tower than We annual burden would require. However, Mtese carryover fords will not be available in future years. $ICii(l,{Sbhpg Mdlll[iOd~CC nsMCt j~4. `~_Sdgm Plazlced Dorm .nir An assessment increase is recommended N tlds district, from 533.19 to 534.60 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior year carryovers are used 11ds year b keep the rate down but will be depleted and unavailable N the future. $lieit i.1B7777n8 tysain Inc pj~Jyp, Q_Commercial/Industrial An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from 53127 to 551.40 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior year carryovers are not available this year to keep the rate dawn. S1[eet LIChh11B Maintenance pjs{pi(J.Jp, Z=lvnrth Etilraoda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district, the rate will remain at 53332 (or Fical Year 1993/94. This proposed rate is subsidized with carryover lands from prior year. $3Cii1 j.78hII0Q Mdldfitldllfe 1(111 ~.x1f~ &=.~Bllfh EII3YaOdd An assessment increase is recommended in this district from 512631 m 5793.75 for Fiscal Year 1993/99. This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting disltict due to a disproportionate number of sheet lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed to the district it is expected that the street light-to-assessment unit will be reduced thereby reducing the assessment mte, Respectfully subrrii d. //~////,~~ L" e `r " Wm. Jce O'Nei City Engineer Attachments: Resolution Annual Engineer's Report 155 RESOLUTION NO. 93 ~ ~ 3 U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACf OF 1972. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21st day of April, 1993, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 93092 to order the therein described work in connection with the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 93-092 was duly and legally published in the Eme, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, any new street lights in areas to be maintained by Ote District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new arms are annexed into the District. The rormal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to Itre City. 'Ibis Aeposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary- and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern Califorttia Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the skeet lights, those street lighb will become a part of the work program of the district. WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, mnceming the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity (or the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired urisdicton to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, Me City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SFCnnnr l: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Sheet Lighting Maintenance Districtr Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1993/94, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 93092, be done and made; and SFCTInN j; Be if further resolved that Me repon tiled by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and Sr:CTION ~ Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1993/94 method of assessment in the Engineer's Repon are hereby approved. 1C Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No.1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 QEOpe~~a~'~ v Oy ~~» No. 24953 ~ ~ x.0/2'3/- y sr''~f a cµ~o~" Approved: ~ G[Gi William J. O' ' ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance DisMct No. I (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Califomia (Undscape and Lighting Act of ]972). Iltckl7rmwd/ Street Light Maintenance Dishict No. 1 (SLD Al) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of sheet lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The (acililies within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of Lhe facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on arterial streets within the rightsof-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development projecPS approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the insfallafion of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light Dishict funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting .4ct of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will biome part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of skeet lights and based on Southern Califomia Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. p,~pjrcted Coats: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD Ml is for elxtricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for Maintenance and Operations. These funds are no longer available. Projected Mainlerunce and Operations costs are increasing by nearly 549,000 over last fiscal year due primaNly to the fact that Gas Tax can no longer subsidize the district. A tax delinquency amount is added M arrive al the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual taz receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD N7 areas follows: pj9yosed Maintenance Rud¢et for 1993N4 Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations f18,000.tq Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 55,470.00 General Liability 53,2600.OD Electric Utilities St85160.[Ml Operatons and Capital Subtotal: 5211,990.OD Assessment Administration and General Overhead f117,27.00 Tax Delinquenry 546390.00 Subtotal: f163,660.00 Total Revenue Required: 5375,650.00 Add: Prior Year Furl Deficit (34.730.00 Assessnrert Revenue Required: 5410,380.00 Opalvaia: The most significant impacb on the proposed FY 93/94 budget are Ote increase of Matnterrertce and Operations of nearly (49,000 due m Me eliminatlon of a prior yeah Stale Gas Tax subsidy, and an increase in the number of street lights and traffic signals. 124054 new assessment units have been annexed inm the district. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment mit is (17.77. That is up (3.96 from the FY 92/93 rate of f13.81. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ 1~L~ w"1e Lx+ts Rate Factx AU Revenue Commercial Acre 3,338.84 f17.77 2 (35.54 5718,660.00 Single Family Parcel 16,426.00 (17.77 1 (17.77 (291 b90.00 Total f410S50.00 d Z ~' o z d ~ 0 U U U O Z o z x z ~ fY, ~.U Gam, ~ O z ems- cn ~~~ 3LD1 AWExAT1tM13 AMI1EXEp AV11Il 1, 19P2 Tx 1329! 15.72 All AMSEIfm AWIIL 1, 1992 Tx 1L365 G1 AY rxME]m Mutt 1, 199! TA 1LK6 3S Au AMMExm INT 6, 1991 111 14A7 11G AU AWIExm M7 6, 1992 T3 1M0)-1 73 W AMNEIR3 1{S1! 3, 1992 Tx lidM ! Ao ASIRMm OCfg23 7, 199! a1 a9-a .o Ac .11x2x2n 9e7o333 ), 1991 r11 1zvs9.1 1s.n Ac Axx2xF0 OCT032A 72, 199'! TS 1619: ]0 ru Axrexm x9r2w[x 1e, 1992 vu t3)t9 10.29 AC 1Nx[xm 0[C2rxi23 2, 1992 A t]7M 12.3 AC ulxt%m UMWIIt 20, 1993 c.u.r. 99•u t.a Ae Lxxczm JAMMII9 m. t993 r3 nm sb w Axx[xm r3~ew) t), 1993 w1 1uu 3.w JC EXHIBIT 'q• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~ AND 4 J ~I a .. _~ M ~. -~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA l~ ~~?~ ASSBS51169! DIn_aAll ~--- --~~----- ----- _~ LABDSCAP6 IIAIHi6RABCH DISfflICi BD. 4 i I-\.~~ TRACT NO. 14365 ~~ ~ ~ t, v ,' ~, c.~ I, ` .~~ <~;' , ~ q j ~1I i~~'/ tit ~;~ ___; ~ _~ I~~ '~ ~....~ ... ~ •~ . _ a _.._ '~ ~~ b a' Y~ - _~ ~' ~' :. 11I r.III ~ l 1~~~~~~ STRClT TRClS 1! ® CITY N1IINTAINED ARGS I STREET' LZGNtS ----------- 15 G. I~ .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING IiAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 W Q D Q Q ~I 6 f,4. /5GAL. L/OU/OAtiJBArP Sr1'~PAC/FLU.9 ~i44LOALroJ ~sr~EE-r rR~s~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA ^'o sca~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO T~f' /4aB6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ EXHIBIT •q• ~/Y / / - Q ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 __ ~ I ~ BASt LINE ROAD ~~ / -~- -._-_v___-~--___~--_~ / f S.N. . ST. 'Ail Nl1INT. EhSDffilf \ 11 S ~ a ~S ' < A, is ~"~ (~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO T,P/4~075f! ~ STATE OF CAL{FORNIA exNimr •~• -- ~ .Z L 5r- LANDS~GS ESMAMEENA NE~DI8TRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ease ~xxe aoan ~- I - ~ I ~ ~ ~, i ~ wl i rI ST. T,(~EE EASEMEiYT NTti' CITY O~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ COUNTY OF' SAN BERNAROINO ' TR/44475H. ~ STATE OF' CALIFORNIA 'A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO5. 1 AND 4 Q45~ L/NE .POA/J "' ADDISON STREET & GRAPEVINE STREET ( I (!&ACt B0. 1440T ~ ( I; STREET rREE EA5€MEN75 ~ a i ~ i t ~,~~•~~ ~~ _ i - ,,, / j (; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 N, T5. ~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONRIIA COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO - T~' /~1~07-i STATE OIL CALIRORNIA ~~ exnieii •q• ~lzSESSMENT DIAGRp-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,~ . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~~- ~,,,, TR 14644 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A" • EXHIBIT •q• ~+-SSESSMENT DIAGkAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 g STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~sr l.~ .:0 I ~q~ n .' ~a P~,. N ~ ~ I GG~Z ' Par.1 v 2 v ~ ~~ W R Y b ~1~ ~ ilia / i Por.3 O ~ 61 ~ C ~ POe ~ 1rsa~ ;O, ~ LOI qC. q ~ Por.l Lu qc. ~ ^_ -NHJE;EENiM- STREET ~ ° - r (~ - rJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Dft 89-04 A .SESSFIAEPIT DIAGi',_.M I I a' I~ z .J l LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 19TH STREET __ ~~ 52REET LIGHTS - 1B 52R£EF :REFS - 110 N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO _ .~-,~ i STATiE OF CALIFORNIA ~ 14192 f~ LAP~DSCAPE MAIE~TEhkhCE DISTRICT h0. 3a STREET LICz1iT!°~u I'vRAINTE~APiCE DISTRICT NOS. 7 A4D n d 2 i ~I i ;~ a -~ I ~ ~~i~- 1 u _ ~~/_ -,_ - a ~~I i R PTICN. PARCELS 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, PARCELS 10, I1 AND PA.4CELS 13 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, ALL AS SHC:WN ON PARCEL MAP 13724 RECORDED IN BOOK 164 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THRCNIGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE CF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ -)--I------.1..__ i "' ARROW FTt. LEGAL DESC I GROUND COVEq TURF iaFES (9.F.1 (5.F.) IE1.1 FOOTHILL BLVD. _-_ --- ZS F07TH.ILL (MEDIANS) 14,$26 -__ g7 ETIWANDA AVE . _ _ _ _ _ _ y ''111 ! f'J° N~+~1~ ®~° V.o~~..8~© t~Y (~' 8~ EXHIBIT A ~~JJ r -- C-\ '~ F:XrTHILL MARKCT ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTCrdAieC~ D;STRICT h0. 3a I~ STRPET LIGHTING ~AItdTENANCE D;STRiCT N0S:_7 AtdD 6 - i - ._. - I I i -----~-- `- ~V n~-_ }il " ~~ v O ~ I / f~l LeGAC nESCRIPTIaa: PARCEL 9 OF PARCEL MAP 13724 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 169 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CCJ:+TY RECORDER OF THE CCL„'TY CF SAN 8'cpNARnIi70, STP.TE OF CALIEYIRNIA x ~°f NIS ~~ ~oz~ ®~ r~~~~e~® ~~~a~a~ed~~ ~- ~~ .77 tl4y 11 L~. ~y L' tbl+~liv~~©~p'V~Q PYHraIT A THE PRICE CC`1PAF:Y Resolution No. S3-Old page 3 - _ - _ exwelr •~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 36 STREET LICaHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 C.u. P. 717-i/ (/1TN 227-JL-OGJ 19w~clL 7 J14tclc / 4a' STREET ~~~~ ' w~~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~,,p 9o-ra VICINITY MAP Edf/1BiT '~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 TRACT 13759 LEGEND • CITY N1IINTAINED AREAS STREET LIGRT IW ~~ I~ ~~ w N w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA ,r ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO _ - ,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA E%BIBIT ,A' f A! iESSMiENT DIAGRL A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 6 -~~ cc~~ ~~Y~ / BASEL /NE _/(OAlJ ~~~ ~_" -T 6-- `\ ~ I t ,~ r ,, ~ L;, ^ ,e I +~I ~ ' 1 ~~~~ J l .. ~ //G! I r u ~..~ µ!+ I~? /T/777TT~{~TT%TT/7%7 TT~77 ~ /7,~y ~ ~~ _ ~ ,.., 1~ ~ Ol~li d LN'.r F. r \ l~~ i II r..a, II lane I a C F ~C Te.1 i S I 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,~y~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,' t• _r-- r ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ e«< MAP ia~,,~ ~~. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~oQeo~rssip~ S~P* ~Ey ~~~3 ,Nno.-2g49'S-3q ~J ~~c.a'-~L!3 1~ Approved: ~~GZ~ William J. O'N it ity Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Sheets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Arfide 4, Chapter 1, Division S of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). naC ~ ?: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation n( sheet lights and traffic signals located on local sheet Mroughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this disMct benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local sheet and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the installation of street lights and traNic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, howevee, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new sheet lights to areas M be maintained by the District, will become part of Nye active work program at such lime as these new areas are annezed inM the District The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer M the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, opera Non and servicing of the sheet lights in each development at the lime of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern Glifomia Edison Company's rate for street light. Immediately upon energizaNon of the street lights, tlwse street lights will biome a part of the work program of the district. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 is for elttMcity charges for the power M the sheet lights and haffic signals in the amount of E201b70. In the past, State Gas Tax funds have been used to subsidize the electricity charges in this district. These funds are no longer available and this is the reason for the 588,140 increase in electric ufiliNes over last fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at Nte Revenue Required M maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency fax payments which is anticipated M occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs M operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Total Personnel 59,980.00 Maintenance and Operations 55,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 59,870.00 General Liability 52,650.0(1 Electric Utilities E20L670.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 5224,170.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 548,620.00 Tax 17elinquency 521 230.m Subtotal: 569,850.00 Total Revenue Required: 5299,1120.00 Less: Fl'92/93 Carryover C 149.270.001 Assessrrent Revetue Required: 2495 ,750.00 Analysis; The most significant impact on the proposed FY 93/94 budget is the increase in elecMdty costs of over 580,000 fo a projected annual cost of over 5200,000. In past y~ra the assessmad rate had beta subsidized by the General Fund or Stale Gas Tax funds. N future years U~is will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment raM. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 539.97. That is up Et0.67 kom the FY 92/93 rate of 529.30. The following ilenJzes fhe assessment rate for the districF. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ la.i~ Tyj7L Urid Rate Famr AU _ Revenue Commerrial Atte 224.63 539.97 2 579.94 577,960.00 Single Pamily Parcel 5799.110 539.97 1 539.97 s?31790.00 Total 2S 49,750.00 z~ ~~ d o i..~ U O ~ "~ ~ ~ 6 W Cx., Qa D ?- C E--~ C!~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ :Lox 4NMEX4TIg5 4MXQIfFD NAIL 1, 1997 TiMT lfit6 77 AU NNFIRD JUIE 3, 1992 TA 7!644 0 IJI ~MMFIIm 4CTll~ 22, 194! T~ 14192 N w 4x9ElfEO JAMW/ M, 19W TA 13759 %411 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 Q~ Q ~, Q~ ~I 6 Ef7. /5GAL. L/DU/DA~1~/B.9iP 5T1',PAC/FLUA ~iSwLO~LTOJ ~sr,~EEr r.P~s~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NO sca<< COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TAP /4QB6 EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRs-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~ AND 2 N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR 14644 STATE OF CALIFORNIA exx1BTT ~~A~~ A ~SESSMEPIT DIdGR_.M I i~ ~a qz .£ 4 ~~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. y AND 2 - - 19TH STREiP __ STREET LIG'r3T5 - 18 STREET TREES - 110 F N ~£ G N'i'S N ~~~~ ~~~ ~r j ~.~-- -~ ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1gt 14192 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM € LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 TRACT 13759 zz 29 30 23 ~ 3i 37 Z4 27 W r. 32 3G 2~ - 26 33 34 35 ~ 4~ 46 s6 ~ ~ 49 55 ~` • Z 4/ ~ ~ 50 54 q • A 6 ~ tQ Qj ~ ~~ 5/ 52 $3 4 <m O - J 5 • Z/IZOI/9I/8I/7I/6I/5I/4I/3I/ZI //IroI9 IPi 17 I6 I~ ~C I~ I~ LEGEND CITY MAINTAINED AREAS • 6TAEET LIGHT N a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDMiO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Q~oeao~essrgy~ W~ v ~~ ~~ No, 24953 r ~ ~,o/ -3/- 3 ~ / /~~ ~'~~ CF CM1~ Approved: ~ 7~~lli William J. O' e' ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Sheet Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cude, Stale of Califomia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD M3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Cmnerally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Eflwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local sheets and ra(fic signals (or a portion Mereoq on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by developne:rt or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of sheet lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Sheet Light District funds, howeveq this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work pmgram at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. 'the normal process will be the dedication of the areas m the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six monNis of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operators of the lighting system. 'Ihe costs will be based nn the number and type of street lights and based on Southern Califomia Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energiration of the street lights, those sheet lights will become a part of the work program of the district. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD 83 is !or elechicity charges for the power to the street lights and haffic signals in the amount of over 5.20,(80. In the past, State f:as Tax fords have been used to subsidize the eletricily charges in Hris district. These funds are no longer available and this is the reason For the 552,950 increase N elechic utilities over the last fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs m operate and maintain SLD M3 are as follows: Prty+osed Maintenanro RndfN for 199~g Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations Su.oo Conhact Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50.00 General Liability $1570.0!' Electric Utilities f124.610 Lx: Operations and Capital Subtotal: SI25,1ti0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead S33S30.00 Tax Delinquency 525.91n 00 Subtotal: 5108,000.00 Total Revenue Required: f184b20.00 Add: Deficit Recovery _ 52290.00 Assessment Revenue Required; 5186,910.00 ARifY81A1 The most significant impact on the proposed FY 93/94 budget is the inttease bi electricity costs of over 550,000 to a projected annual cost of over 5120,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years lhis will not 6e the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 9_?N4 Asseasment Rafe: For FY 93/94(tie ate per assessment unit is 547.15. That is up 517.41 !rom the FY 92/93 rate of 529.74, The following itemizes fhe assessment ate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ lad.S)ae Tune Lir~L4 Rafe Facts A,L!. Reoemw Commerrial Atte 97.53 547.15 2 594.30 59,200,01 Single Family Parcel 3769.00 547.15 1 547.15 5177.710.01 Total sl iu otn n 6 z ~' o z ~ p ~ o ~ U Q U ~ ~ ~ G O U ~ ~ w U ~. ~ O z ccn U ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 ('Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 h~P~~Q'OFES&la~,,. c3 v _~~(„ a4'; m~,p tQo. 24953 ~. ~/2•~/-93 siq~£ N Approved: ~ William J. O'N ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report for Sheet Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 19acke[mtnd; Sheet Light Maintenance Dishict Nn. 4 (SLD N4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community, Generally his area encompasses the area of the City east of Flaven Avenue, soutii of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties wititin this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development nr as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and haffic signals has not been funded wtith Street Light DisMct finds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work pmgram at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to ffie City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the sheet lights in each development at the time of initial operatlon of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon enerb-ization of the sheet lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Pr{tjected Coals: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD X4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly f50,Bf10. A fax delinquency amount is added to arrive at Me Revenue Required to maintain the disMct. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated m occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual fax receipts. The projected costs to operate and mainain SLD 714 are as follows: Total Personnel f44,3fA.00 Maintenance and OperaBons 510,000.00 Contract SeNICeS Traffic Signal Adjustment 55,000.00 General Liability 5840.00 Capital Expenditures: Install Signal ®Terta Vista Pkwy & Church St. $102,000.00 Electric Utilities 547.270.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 5209,470.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 521,280.00 Tax Delupuency 50.00 Subtotal: f21,280.00 Total Revenue Required: 5230,>50.00 Less: FY 92/93 Carryover ( 5101.800001 Assessmest Revenue Required: 5128,950.00 AOi).y0f4i There are no substantial increases in the disMct's budget. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidirnl by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 5101,800 of the disMct's fund balance will go towards the insfalla8on of a traffic sigrul at fhe Intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street. 504.79 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94 dte rate per assessment unit is 528.%. Tfiat is up $1.24 from the FY 92/93 rate of 527.72. The following itemizes the assessment rate for dte district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ laid [;se T Ch+ts Rate Factor AU. Revenue Commercial Aae 923.38 f28,% 2 f57.92 553,480.00 Single Family Parcel 2,626.110 528.% 1 E28.% 575A70.00 Total 728 950.00 z °'" o E" ~ z U ~ U U O Z^~ O ZGY., U OG fs, ~ z Q 17 C W U Cx., W O Vd] SLD1 AM11E71T10RR WNEIf® MRIL 1, 1W2 IRJCT 1{765 11 IW NIMEMEO MRIL 1, 1991 iR1tT 13iW 15.71 W IMYEII® RT 6, 19Yi TR 1407 111111 AMREIIm INf 6, 1901 TR 1407.01 13 NJ ASSdSSNSRT DIn_eAN ~ LANDSCAPE NAIBTBRARCH DISTflICT RD. ~ , ~~..~• TRACT NO. 14365 '~~ `a'rm., ~ ~'\~'~ ~N'. ~. - `~ ` ~ \ ~ NN~ ~ I Y ~~ li i ice' ~~~r~/ ' I} i; ~ ._ -• r--...... i ~ {r.....~ i j -~ ~ a ... _.r~ ~-......~ ice;. I~ _..... ~ __ i ~ '' ~~~... i' 1~ Y ~' ~~~~M~ STREET TREES ® CITY MAINTJIINEO AREAS III I~ STREET LIGIIIS ____ _______ 15 Ell, ~' ~.. 1. .. ., ~ ~ _. ./p.. ;i ., i E%HIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 4 6 j ~~v 6°~ `Jo ~i~ ~p 1 \~ ,~~ ~~ AIN ~~ ORM { CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STIKTE OF CALIFORNIA .a. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 east I.IN6 eoau S.N. • 5T. TMQ MaINT. FASEIDOff li Y N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TAP/4~075H STATE OF CALIFORNIA exHierr ~A• ~~ C ~r`~ LANDSSSPES AMEN A DEAD RRIM NO. 4 STgEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTgICT NOS. 1 AND o BASE LINE ROA- I j \ \ / i /I ~ ~ G~ 1 wl i ~V ST TREE EASEMEiYT ij NT5' CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMON4A _ COUNTY O~ sAN BERNARDINO TR/~1~09 Shy ~ STATE Of CALIRORNIA _ 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 8,45 L /NE .POA/) i~ i ADDISON STREET & GRAPEVINE STREET (lHIC! s0. 14107 1 ( Iw ~STREE7" 7',t'EE EASEMENTS f I ~I i }1 I! i GRAPEVINE STRLrET _ Z w i i ~ ~/ // ~/ A ~ Op s~,~soti, i N. TS. ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO - r,P i44o~ ~ STATE OF CALIgORNIA _ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~Qaotessioyq~ ~`~ ~y ~, F~ No. 24453 ~F ua~2-3/-93 X srgrF~C~~ Approved: GGu William J. o' ' , Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fisci Year 99!94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of ArECIe 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Cude, State of California (Landscape and Lighting .4ct of 1972). 9isk~tnlnd: Sheet Light Maintenance Dishict No. 5 (SLD M5 is used to fund the maintenance and/or instillation of sheet lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and haffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planmd Community. Typically, sheet lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lighb can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and Kaffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is pennihed under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new sheet lights in areas to be mainUined by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing acct six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, opea0on and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizaBon of the street lights, those street lights will become a pan of the work program of the district. $nyerted Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD MS is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of wer 527,000• Funds carried over from the 92/93 Fiscal Year will allow the dishict to install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. A tax delinquency amount is added to acive at the Revenue Required to maintain the dishict This is a projected amount of delinquency taz payments which is anticipated to occur during F1' 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD HS are as follows: Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations SI2,780.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50.00 General Liability $480.00 Capital Expenditures: Street Light Installation 524,200.00 Electric Utilities 527330.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 564,790.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 59,100.00 Ddinquenry Contingency 5260.00 Subotal: 59,340.00 Total Revenue Required: 574,130.00 Less: FY 92/93 Canyover ( 533.610.001 Assessment Revenue Required: 540520.00 Analy~l4: There are tw substantial increases in the dishict's budget. In past years the assessmert rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or Stale Gae Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the disMct's assessment rate. 524,220 of the district's fund balance will be used ro install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. Nn new assessment units have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 534.60. That is up 51.41 from the F1' 92/93 rate of 533.19. The following itemizes the assessment rate for Me districe Unit No. of Unit Rate/ IadlJse Tvne lJruts Rabe Factor A.ll. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1.1ZL0B 534.60 1 534.60 540520.f111 Total 1,171.00 540 20.00 ~--, w U W r-r r~ ~-~-~ ~~ ~y ~~ ~~ w w ~M U~ z ~ ~ z d o U " ° z ~ ~ o Z 6 ,~ C W U fs, W 6 ~_ 6 A Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~oQaOfE~~t as~P ¢~ ~' No. 24953 ~l ~F ~/ ~ Approved: //i~GGGu~ .' William J. O' ' ,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Comm erci al/Industrial ) Fiscal Year 93196 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division S of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 131tk~mlOd: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD 86) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and indusMal streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within Mis district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light DisMct funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be mainUirced by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenarce, operation and servicing of the steel lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energiration of the street lights, those street IighK will become a part of the work program of the disMct. Ptuiected Costa: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD K6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over 516,0(10. A tax delinquency amount is added to arive al the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency fax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax rneipls. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD N6 are as follows: Total Personnel f7,480.(q Maintertance and Operations (2,500.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjust~t 56,580.00 General Liability 5310.00 Electric Utilities 576.800.00 Maintenanm & Operations Subtotal; f33b70.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead (5,370.00 lax Delinquency 55.170.00 Subtotal: ft0,540.(p Total Revenue Required: (44,210.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit 53.180.00 Assessmad Revenue Required: (47,390.00 Aa51x4ic There are no significant increases N the budget. to past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 7057 new assessment uNts have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment uNl is f51A0. That is up (20.19 from the FY 92/93 rate of 831.21. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the districC Unit T No. of L'nit UN P R Rate/ A U R jypdjJg voe Indstrial/Comet Aae d arlor ate 921.98 (51.40 1 . . (51.40 evenue f~,QQ Total (47,390.00 ~ i i 1 ~ ~I 1--^- "-~, •I ~~ -- ~~. °`y r, .~ 71Y ~ ~ Y011Y11Ill ' ' ~ i ~ 6 z F g T ~z w _ d p U l i pli11R0Y i I U O Z O Z ~ _ -- 11]M1lli4 ~ Qy ~ I ' , ~ / ~ (Y..,~U ~ • Gs. - - -- F can ~.. ~ ~ ~ --ix4n 1 • ~~r~ lr ;fearo t ~g w sto6 ANAEIGiI ONS ANNEMEB aCiUBER 7, 1992 DR 89-UG ,43 AC ANNE%E9 OEiOBEA 7, 1952 PM 12959-1 18.2] AC AHxEXEH NOVEMBER iA, 1992 PN 13R< 30.29 AC AMXEXEJ Of [EMBER 2, 1992 PN /372< 12.3 AC ANNENEB JANUARY 20, 1993 C.U.p. 90.18 <,BB A[ AXNEXEO FEBRUARY iT, 1993 pM 14318 7.<7 AC EXHIBIT 'A• aSSESSMENT DIAGFsAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 3 " A• 3 ., „ p.N" v ,~ i L .N I LG'L I ~ • P°r.1 ° V ~ Sf W t at,re `.1 •Iq ~' Par. S.' fl j ~ o POr. S . i -~- Q po ~ i.ouC. 4 P.N" var. ~ ` ~ Pacl Lu •c. -NFNKEEN+M- 5;~7EE~ ~ ° - °~ r~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 89-04 Resoluti~ No. 92-264 Pa•7e 3 aAFOw POUTE PM /P~59•/ ' I , ~ T I ~ c T ' _ i ~'~~,_ I!I ~~ -1 ' ~~ T---r---- ~Iir / i, .~ +~ I~ i - P. M. /2959 .-- SHEET INDEX MAP I ..: ~) ~I ICI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E'EN ;iNEERING DIVISION ~~~ ~' ~" ITEM: TITLE: '~ M ~ 2 95 % - I d,/ EXHIBIT: _ tl V/C/N/TY MAP E ): FII~IT 'A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3e STREET LIGIiTIPv~G fJiAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 A4D o ~ 2 ;'Z ~ Q ~ i ~! U I k~ ~,~Ir-- 1 V~I / n ~- i~Q I'~ ~~(`. GROUND COVER TVPF TRE!5 (9.f.) I$.f.) IE~.( FOOTHILL eLYD. -_- --- 25 FIX7IHILC (MeoIANS) 14,826 --- 57 ~.IwANOa AvE. _-- --- ~ D. G:~ u ~P m~ ~l~16~I~E$® ~i:tl1R:696y3®Eti7Q'a~". -Y~ C®O,DUo3Ti i'f ~D~r ~~68~ f~E5~R9A6'~~~R~® `~\ I ~ ~~Q+'~~ ®C~ ~L~~.B~r®Wt~1BG'~ E%HIRIT A . R'~THILL t1M1~RKC'"^'~^'1 V LEGAL DE5CRIPTIOV• PARCELS 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, PARCELS 10, 11 AND PARCELS 13 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, ALL AS SHCRJN QV PARCEL MAP 13724 RIX.'ORDED ZN BODR 164 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE CUU[SPY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA _I d I `~ ~ ~ I' ,; ~i VIi ., ~- I~ I ~~ I~ i -- I~ f ~. I~Ir C.I ~~' i }i c ,~ ~~i 4 ~, .... ~~EiY ',. LAt`DSCAPE RPAIIVTEidAir: E D!S T RICT hb. 3a STREET l_IGNTIIdG NiAI{d T cf~lAPeCc DISTRICT tddS:_1 AIdD 5 . -_ ..: I ~ ~- - ~_--~---- I Iy ~ i P 13 r2`f i`iii'f;;. -- ~ ~ SATE -__~ f _.-L~__._.-_.1....-~-------~ ~-AiL~ROW__ RT~..._. - ,.:: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 9 OF PARCEL MAP 13729 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BCX1K 164 Or^ PARCEL MAPS PAGES 100 THROUGH 107 INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF T::.. CC.'~7I'Y P.5CORDER OF THE CG::.7TY CF 5AN BERC]AFDII.0~ STATE OF CALI:YIRNZA P h°` ,I ^~ ~, ~ `-"~' ~ tl~1r1 ~ ~~' (~°b~~~~°~iu~"§,~J~Q F~H,PIT a ~~ ~ TFI% PRICE CC>7PANY R~solixtion No. 93-014 Page 3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3g STREET LIGNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 6 c.u. r 7lrii ~A-N 2x7-xN -oL~ FA.~c[t 7 AKcrt 4~ STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA 1 COUNTY OF. SAN BERMARDINO ~- ~ - STATE OF CALIFORNIA "-'-~ G./L D. 90 - /8 ~..- A! iESSMENT DIAGRL A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 _ _ BASEL /NE /IoAJJ _ ~ , -____ 1"/oc/e-___ _~__ I ,I -,,,~ --w~ .... ~ - ~ .~-=- `=-- - ~T- t ~ ~. ~ ! ri A•~ t 1 lA~ f e' 1 u !J ~ ~ .. (1). d~fl~ S \ ~• ~ (110/F) 1~J~-. / .. /.~1{1I 1J~ 1 1 ` .~ ~ e ~ V \ I ~ ` ~ ICJ ' ` ~ I All ~~ I I PI' 1 ~ ~ /4 ht 1.J \rb °' v~~G~~ I k / N ~ .• i L_J1~el.CYL / T L_J 2 ~~ Q ~' ~•'~ ~' 'T /Ti77T/`TicY'~77717T1'y7T~~~ /7' = nu ~I \~~\ a ~~~ M / L+ ~ e G bi / ~ ~ ~ L ..~ ` l U T+` / Lr.I ~\ \~ .~/e~ =-~i: tilt f ~ v I ~-_.. ~ r~~ V~ J r 516. aT ~ ~T I pre) r{ I IcrQ~ _; V V/ GMivG ~~ IP' ~ ~ ( ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PA,eceL MAP /9318 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 No. 24953 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's RepoN Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiaral Year 9x/99 The Fl' 93194 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighfing Act of ]972). Ravi{;rou..d: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD ff7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this disMct benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion tlrereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and sheet lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, dre installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been fundr+a with Street Light Distract fulls, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas am annexed into the District The nonral process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six rtwnfhs of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation acrd servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street light. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the disMct. )',1Rf eAed Coats: The majority of the budgeted costs (or SLD N7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over;11,00(1. A fax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district This is a projected amount of delinquenty tax paymenh which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual Paz receipt. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD M7 are as follows: Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Opaafions 5200.00 Contrail Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50.00 General Liability 5170.00 ElecMc Utilities 511.770.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 512,140.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 54b20.00 Tax Delinquency 56310.(X1 Subotal: 58,930.00 Total Revenue Required: 521,070.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover <S1.11400(A AssessmeN Revenue Required: 520,030.00 ADilY-fll: There are no sigificant increases in the budget. A fund balance cartyover of 51,010.00 is available ro keep the assessment rate the same as last fiscal year. No new assessment unib have heal annexed inro the district this year. For FY 93/94 the rate pa assessment unit is 533.32. There is no increase in this assessment rate ova the FY 92/93 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate (or the districk Unit No. of Unit Rate/ 533.32 1 533.32 w .-, C~ ~---~ ~~ ~~ -~ ---~ ./~ o~ 6 ~ U ~j ~'Oz o ~ x z ~ w ti'6i A'-. U W O ~ ~ Cn ~i A ~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ~E~PROFLCVpy~ ~~ O ~No~. ~24~9~5~3q ~K ca.~'3 CRUE Apprrned: William J. o' il, Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance Distrito No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Ye.. ax/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance DISMCt No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Ilask~vtlod: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD a8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or irutallation of street light and traffic sigrals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etwanda area of tlse City. Generally tlsis area encompasses the area of the City east of EfiWanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that dte facilities N this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the South Etlwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street light can be imtalled by development or es a City capital improvement project. Hietoricaily, the hbtallatlon of street lights and traffic signals has not been (unded with Street Light District funds, lawgiver, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas m be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. 'This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six rtanths of ordinary and usual maintenance, operatlon and servicing of the sheet lights in each developrrtent at the tltrre of initial operation of the ligfiting system. 7'he cosh will be based on the number and type of street lights and based an Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon eru!rgizadon of the street lights, Rase street lights will become a part of the work program of the disMd. Pie3eRedSoafa The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD MB Is for electricity charges for the power [o the sheet lights and traffic signals in the amount of ready S4,IXb. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required a maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payrntmb which is anticipated m occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipt. The projected msb M operate and maintain SLD NB are as follows: $oooaed M, -_- >i^r~nTM^ Ryaet for Lao1•s• Total Personnel 50,00 Maintenance and Operations 5130.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjusfinert SO.oo General Liability 550 ~ Electric Utilities iaAb(t 00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: f4,040.00 Assessment Adminishation and General OverMad $720.00 Tax Delinquency sa0.IX1 Subtotal: 6760,00 Total Revenue Required: 64,810.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit c2.170.tN1 Assessment Revenue Required: 66.980.00 AoalYlit: In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD #8. in the FY 93/94, 35 additio~l parcels were added to the distriM making a total of 36. 35 of these parcels are owned by one company, the devebper, Citation Homes, Inc. No new assessment unib have been annexed into the district this fiscal year. FY 93/94 Asse went R te• For FY 93/94 dte rate per assessment unit is 693.75. iliac is up 667.44 from the FY 92/93 rate of 5126.31. The folbwing itemi: es the assessment rate for the disMct Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Single Family Parcel ,'{f,QQ f193.75 1 Total 36.m r~~ .~ .~ /'L+ r'~y v s c z~ ~ z -~ o 0 U U U O ~ d~~~ C]C PG U O ~ 6 V] U w c ~ ~' Cl']'T UN' HANCHU CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ DATE lone 16, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council; lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A, Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT ORDINANCE TO CLEAN UP LANGUAGE REGARDING TEMPORARY PERMITS RECOMM&NDATTON it is :ecommendcd that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance amendment to Section 9.24.200 of Chapter 9.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code which would allow for the conditional issuance of temporary massage technician permits. BACKGROUND It has been over a year since Ordinance 485, regulating massage establishments and technicians, was enacted by the City Council. In that time we have discovered that a problem czisls in the current ordinance which creates long delays for legitimate business people. The current ordinance requires all applicants (or a massage technician permit to have a criminal background check completed prior to being issued a permit. This background check is taking up to 60 days to complete. To address the concerns of legitimate business people and massage technicians, the attached ordinance was drafted. The attached ordinance is similar to provisions in our Tazi Ordinance allowing for temporary driver's permits. The temporary permit would be issued after the applicant had completed their application, paid all applicable fees, provided results of their medical examination, and showed proof that they had been fingerprinted by the Sheriffs Department for their background check. The temporary permit is valid as Tong as no provisions of the ordinance are violated and provided that the applicant did not falsify any information on their application. The mmporary permit can be terminated at any time by the City if the applicant violates provisions of the Massage Ordinance and terminates automatically when the applicant receives clearance for a regular permit. This amendments is recommended as a clean up to the existing ordinance to allow temporary permits as we do in the Taxi Ordinance and as a response to the concerns raised by business people in the community. Respectfully Submitted, ~.. ~Q~~~ ~ i ~.T"""".I ~/, Duane A. Raker Assistant to the City Manager l+lw7 ORDINANCE 4g5-B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.24.200 OF CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE TECHMC[AN PERMfIS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION i• Section 9.24.200 of Chapter 9.24 is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "It is unlawful for any person to engage in the business of acting or to act as a massage technician unless such person holds a valid massage technician permit issued by the city. Each massage technician permit holder shall be issued a photo identification badge which will also serve as a massage Iechnician permit. The permit holder shall maintain the massage technician permit visibly on his or her person during business hours. Each permit holder shall immediately surrender to the director any massage technician permit issued by the city upon the suspension, revocation, or expiration of such permit." "A permit under This section shall be valid for twelve months from the date of issuance unless revoked or suspended." "Upon payment of all fees, submittal of the required application and proof of completion of fingerprinting and photographing, the city council, or its designee, may issue a temporary massage technician permit which shall be valid if the applicant certifies under penalty of perjury that there arc no grounds for denying the applicant a permit under the provisions of Section 9.24.430 of this chapter. A temporary massage technician permit may be terminated by the city at any rime by written notification of termination to the holder of the temporary massage technician permit if an investigation by the city determines that grounds for denial of a permit exists under Section 9.24.430 of this chapter. Any temporary permit shall automatically terminate upon the issuance of a regular massage technician permit to tF,e applicant after the completion of the sheriffs investigation." $$~1; The City Council declares that, should eny provision section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final coon action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SEC[70N 3; The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (IS) days after its passage et Icast once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California, !rClt ~xt~x ter tsviv~nv t;ut;ntitt~rvtsn STAFF REPORT DATE: June 16, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SLiBIECT: CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND STREAMLINE CTTY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES The City Council asked that this discussion be continued from its June 2, 1993 meeting. Attached for the Council's review is the listing of City Council Committees, Subcommittees, and Commissions as designated from the November 30, 1992 City Council meeting. Respectfully Sub 'tted, iane O'Neal ` Management Analyst [I Attachment: List of City council Committees, Subcommittees, and Commissions The folbwing e a brief synopsis of each of dte Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions. BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALITTON (CLOUT) Provides a program of actlon for the public and pdvate sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area-wide importance. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE The City Selection Committee is made up of all of the Mayors for San Bcmardirw County and its purpose e m select elected repesenmrives m various bodid which include: Local Agency Farrnation Commission (LAFCO and the Atr Quality Management DisvicL The regular meeting o[ the committee is held on the tau working day of April ofevery even nttrnbeaed year, Mayor is Representative AB 939 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE This e a tiara mandated task force created by San Berrtertlino County and is made up of the Boats of Supwisors, elected rcpresenlatives from each City within Smt Bentardino and 10 nat<kcted represptmdvea The purpose of the task force e m coordnate the development of the County and City's Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and b coordinate a cost effective regional solid waste matmgemem system, Meets on a Quarterly Base; the Third Thoraday of Fsch Moog from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. in Sao Bernardino. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE Provides liaison wiN the Swth Coati Air Qoabty Management District regarding air quality issues. Meela as Needed DELF.CATE: Stout ALTERNATE: Gutkrrea ANIMAL CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the building of the Animal Cnnwl Facility and morriuxs mutual items of intertaL Meets an Needed DELEGATF.5: Stoot aed Buquet CABLE TELEVISION/PUBLIC ACCESS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for Ute cable ftkvision franchises and to develop Ne public access portion o[ the hanchise agreement Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Bugaet and Gutierrez CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION The Associadon provides a netwaddng with other contract cities [or services, such as working on legislation, and is cttnenUy workng on a more equimbk distribution of property tax (especially to bw/no property taz cites). Meals as Needed DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Stout CENTRAL PARK DESIGN COMMITTEE Rovides liaison for Ute dovelopment of the City's Central Park and will serve as City Council liaison for library issues. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Sloot and Williams ALTERNATE: Gutierrez CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE Provides liaison betwcen the Chamber of Commerce and Ute City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinatlng projects and items of mutual inleresL Marts Second Wednesday of Each Month DELEGATE: Wilifama ALTERNATE: Alexander COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE Monitors the activities of dte FamWation and items of mutual interest. Meets u Nerded DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams DAY LABORER TASK FORCE Provides liaison ro the Day labor issues. Meets as Nteded DELF.CATES: Alexander and Gutirrrex 6G1 DEVELOPMENT AND INSPECTION REVIEW AD HOC COMMITTEE (ARROYO SEGO STUDY) Assisu wiN devekping plan review, pami[ issuance arrd inspection services encompassing both dre City atM Fire District Meets as Nteded DELEGATES: Bnqoet and Alexander EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison with the Emergency Ptepare4ness Department in dw coordinadon of its projects and disaster Ps~s Fleming. Mrels as Needed DELEGATES: Williams aed Gutierre: FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison with the Firrmce Dtparunent Meets u Needed DELEGATES: Bngnet axd Williams FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Reviews employment eligibiliry fists prior m certification and other rekled personnel masers. Meets ax Needed DELEGATES: Stout and Alexander HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE Revews aDoNable housing needs and devekrps suategy and programs for agency set-aside moray. Meets u Netded DELEGATES: Akxaodsr and Gutierrez INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OP CALIFORNIA CITIES The Inland Empire League is one of fiftcen divisions within dre League of California Cities and functiona az m "arm" of cities. The League also provides uaining, legislative tracking, and research [or azsociale cities. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Stoul M LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for law atfarcernen[ icsrscs including coordirvdan of the Anti-Gtatliti Task Fmce. Mtets u Needed DELEGATES: Stout and Bogtret MOBILE NOMF. ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the Ciry's Mabde Home Accord and coniwct negotiations, The Accord is a contract between the owners of the City's mobik home parks and the City and addresses rent stabilization fa tlx: nwbik home parks. Mtek a, Needed DELEGATES: Williams and Geticrrex ALTERNATE: Alexaeder OMN[TRANS OMNITRANS is a Joint Powers Agreement whicA coordinates tAe busing nxds of its associak cities. Thcae matimgs art held the first Wedrtesdsy of each month N Sm BemaMUto aM begin u 8:00 a.m. DELEGATE: Buqutl ALTERNATE: Alexaeder PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for du; construction of pmt and rx~ea[im facditks and ilpns of mutual tort.ern. Meets u Needed DELEGATES: Scoot aed Williams PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides Raison fa public wets gojecu duoughwt the City. Meett as Needed DF,LEGATPS: Buqoet and Williams REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE Rovidcs Raison far the marloedng of tAe City and reviews agercy marketing budget MeeU as NtMed DELEGATES: Stout aed Williams REGIONAL MALL SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison fa the cortttruction of the Regional Mall. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Stout and Bngxet SAN DERNARDINO COUNTY GANGS & DRUG TASK FORCE Intrztaca wish other local agertcies and districts m address gmrg and drug issues tluoughout our region. Meats as Needed DELEGATES: Williams and Gofiarrez SAN BERNARDiNO COUNTY SOIL EROSION SUBCOMMITTEE This is a San Banartlirw County Subcommittee rstablished fa the Soii Erosion District Tltc City participatrs on this Subcornmit[ce and providra liaison fa the soil condiUens within Ne City and also monitors the prevention of soil erosion during nigh winds. Meefa as Needed DELEGATG: Cutkrrez ALTERNATE: WIIliama SANBAG SANBAG is the regional planning authority oC which die City participaW in through a Joint Powers Agreement These meetings are held the first Wednesday of each month in San Barurduw an(I begin at 9:00 a.m. DELEGATE: Buquet ALTERNATE: Akxeeder SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) SCAG is an assaiation of County and City govanmenm and is a Councg of Cmvemmenu (COG). The pugtose of such councils is to provide a forum where members can reach agreanent on issues of common concern and develop regiarel Planning approaches. Mzeta as Herded DELEGATE: Stout ALTERNATE: WBliama SPHERE. OF INFLUENCE SUBCOMMITTEE provides liaison fa those issues affecting die City's sphere of inFluerrco, Meta as Netded DELEGATES: Sloul aed Buquet G7l/ YOUTH ASSISTANCE SUBCOMMITTEE Addrtsses funding oppamnities far proposed comprehensive youdt assismncc programs for at-risk youths and rhea famlllea. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Akxaeder and Cotlertez VICTORIA LAKES SUBCOMMITTEE Liaison for design plans, lakes, and mainknence costs for the project Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Bugnel aed Williams ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION The Council Subcpnmit[eea for dleae Commissions carldax the interviews for Ne expired terns aM vacancies m they occur and provide liaison for items of mutual interest EMC DELEGATES: Stout aed W1114ma HPC DELEGATES: Akxaxder aed Cotkrte: Park & Recreation DELEGATES: Begeet aed W1116ma Planning DELEGATES: Stool od 8uquet Public Safety DELEGATES: Akxaoder and Gu[lerrez Ciry Fray Monument Subcanmittee League of California Cities Voting RepreSGlmtive (Will be egeediznU as appraixiate) Library Services Creation Tank Face Nordic Woods Subcanmittet Recreatiaml Vehicle Subcanmiaee Regiotmi Av Quality Ekment Subcammitlee 231 COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES A.yp COMMISSIONS St4Lt An Quality Management District (AQMI)) Committee Animal Control Subcormtritree Central Panic Design Committee City Selection Committee Environtnental Management Commission Subcommittee Fve District Personml Cottvmttce Law Enforcement Subc«nmittx Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Planning Commission Subcootmitree Redevelopment Marketing Subconunittte Regional Mall Subcatt®trce Southern California Assoriated Govenumnts (SCAG) Sphc¢ of lnnuence Subcanndttee California Contras Cities Association Inland Empve League of California Cities Alsxandet AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT) California Contras Cities Association Community Fouttdation Subcommittee Day Laborer Task Fore Development and Inspection Review Ad Hoc Comm (Arroyo Seco) Fite District Petsmm] Cotarniltee Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee Housing Set Aside Subcottutdtt« Wand Empue League of California Cities Public Safety Commission Subcommittce Youth Assistance Subcommittee Chamber of Coatvteme Representative Mobile Holm Accord Review Subcotmittee Omnitrans SANBAG DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alttrnate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Altenrate Ahanate Alternate ~17Li COUNCII. COMMITTEES/SiTBCOMMI'ITEE_SRND COMMISSIONS 1}J%IttCt Animal Control Subcommittee DELEGATE Cable TelevisionlPubhe Access Subcorornittee DELEGATE Development and Inspection Review Ad Hoc Comm (Arroyo Seca) DELEGATE Finance Subcontntittce DELEGATE Law Enforcement Subcormnittee DELEGATE Ornnitrans DELEGATE Pads and Rtxreadon Commission Subcommittee DELEGATE Publre Works Subcommittee DELEGATE Planning Commission Subcommittee DELEGATE Regional Mall Subcormrtittce DELEGATE SANBAG DELEGATE Sphere of influence Subcommittee DELEGATE Victoria Lakes Subconvtrittee DELEGATE SiLGf~2 Cable Television/Public Access Subcommittce DELEGATE Day Labour Task Force DELEGATE Emergency Preparedness Suhcomrttittee DELEGATE Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee DELEGATE Housing Set Aside Subcommittee DELEGATE Motrile Home Accord Review Subcommitttx DELEGATE Public Safety Commission Subcornrnittee DELEGATE San Bernardino County Gangs & Dmg Task Force DELEGATE San Bernardino County Soil Erosion Subcomnttee DELEGATE Youth Assistance Subcommittee DELEGATE Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Alternate Central Park Design Committee Alternate S}'.1~118015 Central Park Design Committee DELEGATE Chamber of Commerce Repprreesentatlve DELEGATE Community Foundation Subcommittee DELEGATE Emergency Preparedness Subconanittee DELEGATE Environmental Management CAmmission Subcommittee DELEGATE Finance Subcommittee DELEGATE Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee DELEGATE Park and Recreation Commission Subcomrttittee DELEGATE Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee DELEGATE Public Work Subcommittee DELEGATE Redevelopment Marketing Subcoennrittee DELEGATE San Bernarduto County Gangs & Drug Task Force DELEGATE San Bemardirto County Soil Erosion Subcommitta DELEGATE Victoria Lakes Subcommittee DELEGATE AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Alternate Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CI.OU1) Alternate Southern California Associated Governments (SLAG) Alternate PAGE City Council Agenda June 16, 1993 7 ADDENDUM D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items era expected to be routine and non-coniroveroial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councllmember or member o1 the audience for discussion. 20. Approval of Modifiartion to Deposit Agreement for Completion of Flood Wall and Equestrian Trails relafirg to Tract 13566-i, boated in the vicintty of 24th Street and Wardman Bullock Road with the Caryn Development Company and Bank of American Notionol Tnut and Sovings Association. CITY OF RANCHO CLJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: June 16, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Ylill iam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MODIFICATION TO DEPOSIT AGREEMENT FOR COMPLETION OF FLOOD WALL AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS RELATING TO TRACT 13566-1, LOCATED IN THE VI CINiTY OF 24TH STREET AND !JARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD WITH THE CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND BANK CF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the modification of the subject agreement by minute action. BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS On October 21, 1992, the City Council approved an agreement providing for the construction of the additional work necessary for the flood wall as well as the diligent completion of the equestrian trail for Tract 13566-1. The agreement also discusses the release of occupancy for Tract 13566-1. Basically, upon execution of the agreement, all existing structures, other then the three model homes, were allowed to be released. The three model homes would not be released until the equestrian trail was accepted by the City. The Developer is now requesting the release of two of the models and offering a production house in exchange for the two models (see attached letter). Staff feels the City will be adequately protected by retaining the two houses as proposed by the Developer. Respectfully submitted, ~~o~~~-~ w;n;am J. D'Na;l City Engineer IJJO: DJ ad DEVEL'Ot'ME May 27, 1993 M. r. William Jce O'Neil City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CORQORATiON V1A FACSIMILE ^ (909) 987-6499 ~~,, ~~~~ Gryaf - ': R. /~ 0, ~ c ~, y F~~ N ~°~ s i N° `+ rw RE: Exchange of Secured Properties and Release of Models -Tract 13566.1 Dear Mc O'Neil: As you know, the agreement among the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rockfield Development and Rank. of America concerning completion of Tract 13566-I included a requirement of completing the adjacent eastern equestrian trail before the three models would be released for occupancy. We are hereby requesting an exchange of the secured properties and release of two of the models as follows; release the models at Lot 14 and Lot 16 for occupanry; retain the model at Lot 15 and the production house at Lot 3 as secured properties until completion of the equestrian trail. The reasons for our request are as follows: 1. The models at Lot 14 and Lot 16 are in escrow with approved buyers, are completed, and arc ready for immediate, occupancy. 2. Work is currently in progress on the equestrian trail and adjacent landscaping by Lanco landscaping, under contract to Rockfield Development, and is on schedule for completion. 3. All other bonded improvements and "punch list" items required by the City have been completed. 4. All required maintenance bonds are in place. n. i • i' i ~, 'i„ Iii.. t.. ... i\\n,~i Mr. William Joe O'Neil May 27, 1993 Page Two Your consideration of our request in a timely manner is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Diversified Pacific Development Corporafion \ ~ L\ .~ 1 ~.rv~.yj~v Thomas L Jacobs Construction Manager TL,T:maj CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager l~~'d BY: Olen ]ones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: Substitute resolutions for actions approving the sale of outstanding mortgages under the City/Agency Mortgage Bond Programs The attached resolutions for [he City and Agency are substitutions for the resolutions included in the Agenda packets for June 16, 1993. The revised resolutions add an action to amend the Trust Indentures for the mortgage bond programs which clarifies certain tax issues relative to the repayment of the bonds. There are no other changes in the actions. cc: lack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BAN%, as Trustee PIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE Relating to $27,825,000 Home Mortgage Revenue Bonda, 1984 Seriea A Dated ae of June 1, 1993 r~evoma PIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (Supplemental to the Trust Indenture dated as of July 1, 1984) Relating to the Issuance of the $27,825,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Mortgage Revenue Honda, 1984 Series A THIS FIRST SUPPLEMHNTAL TRUST INDENTURE, dated ae of June 1, 1993, by and between the CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State of California (the "City"), and SEATTLH-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, duly organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America and authorized to accept and execute trusts of the character herein set out, and by virtue of the laws of the State of California with its principal corporate Cruet office located in Seattle, Washington, as trustee (the "Trustee"). W I T N E S S E T H• WHEREAS, the City and the Trustee entered into a Trust Indenture (the "Indenture"), dated ae of July 1, 1984, providing for the issuance of $27,525,000 principal amount of the City's Home Mortgage Revenue Sonde, 1984 Series A (the "Sonde"), the proceeds of which were used to purchase from certain mortgage lending institutions certain home mortgagee (the "Home Mortgagee^) made to finance single-family dwelling units intended for use as the permanent place of residence by persona of low and moderate income; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(5) of the indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the City and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds (ae defined in the Indenture), to conform with the proviaiona of Section 103(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and any applicable regulations or rulings promulgated or issued thereunder, if such modification or amendment, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or tax counsel, will assist in clarifying the applicability of said Section 103(A) to the Home Mortgagee and to the Bonds or will insure that the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds is not impaired; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(6) of the Indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the City and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Honda and provided the interests of the eondholdera are not adversely affected, in order to cure any ambiguity or defect or inconsistent provision, or to insert such proviaiona clarifying matters or questions; WHEREAS, the City, with the consent of the Trustee, wishes to amend Article XTV, Section 1401(A) of the Indenture for N91708W - 1- the purposes stated in Article X, Sections 1001 (5) and 1001(6) and hereby requests the Trustee to enter into this First Supplemental Trust Indenture; and WHEREAS, all other conditions precedent necessary to amend the Indenture, pursuant to Articles X and XI of the Indenture have been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDHNTUAE WITNE55ETH, that the City and the Trustee, ir. accordance with the terms of the Indenture agree as follows: 1. Amendment to Arti 1 XIV ion 1401(A). Article XIV, Secti o:r. 1401 (A) of the Indenture is amended to read in full as follows: Section 1401 Defeasan a (A) If the City shall pay or cause to be paid, or there shall otherwise be paid, to the Holders of the Bonds then Outstanding, the principal and interest and Redemption Price, if any, to become due thereon, at the times and in the manner stipulated therein and in this Indenture, then and in that event the covenants, agreements and other obligations of the City to the Bondholders shall be discharged and satisfied. In such event, the Trustee shall pay over or deliver to or at the direction of the City all moneys or securities held by it pursuant to this Indenture which are not required for the payment or redemption of Bonds not theretofore surrendered for such payment or redemption; provided that the City shall have received an opinion of nationally recognized bond cr tax counsel to the effect that the receipt of such moneys or securities will not adversely affect the tax-exempt statue of interest on the bonds; and provided further that in the event such opinion of each counsel directs that the principal balance of any Home Mortgagee are to be reduced, the City shall .instruct the Trustee of the action to take in order to so reduce such principal balances of such Home Mortgages. Thereafter, the Mortgage Loans shall be delivered by the Trustee to the City or to such other party as may be directed by the City. 2. ,Effect of First St(pyil emental Tr+9 r n Except as specifically provided in this First Supplemental Trust Indenture, the Indenture remains in full force and effect. 3. F f 'v Dat o Pira iDy~ement-1 Zndentur This First Supplemental Trust Indenture shall take effect upon its execution and delivery. ~~enoaev - g _ 4. Hxe {on 'n o +-par This Pirat Supplemental Trust Indenture may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Seattle-First National Bank have executed this First Supplemental Trust indenture by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Dfayor IS E A L] Attest: City Clerk SHATTLS-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee By: Title: f JP 170869 - 3 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA RSDSVRLOPM6NT AGHNCY and SHATTLS-PIRST NATIONAL BANR, as Trustee PIRST SUPPLRMHNTAL TRUST INDSNTURB Relating to $21,375,000 Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A Dated ae of June 1, 1993 f~eimeae PIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (Supplemental to the Trust Indenture dated as of July 1, 1984) Relating to the issuance of the $?.1,375,000 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURH, dated as of June 1, 1993, by and between the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ci~zly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State of California (the "Agency"), and SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, duly organized and existing under Che laws of the United States of America and authorized to accept and execute trusts of the character herein set out, and by virtue of the laws of the State of California with its principal corporate trust office located in Seattle, Washington, as trustee (the "Trustee"). W I T N E 9 3 E T H: WHEREAS, the Agency and the Trustee entered into a Trust indenture (the ^indenture^), dated ae of July 1, 1984, providing for the issuance of $21,375,000 principal amount of the Agency's Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Seriea A (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of which were used to purchase from certain mortgage lending institutions certain home mortgagee (the "Mortgage Loans") made to finance single-family dwelling unite intended for use as the permanent place of residence by persons of low and moderate income; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(5) of the Indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the Agency and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds (ae defined in the Indenture), to confozm with the provisions of Section 103 (A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and any applicable regulations or rulings promulgated or issued [hereunder, if such modification or amendment, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or tax counsel, will assist in clarifying the applicability of said Section 103(A) to the Mortgage Loans and to the Bonds or will insure that the tax-exempt status of interest on the 9onds is not impaired; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(6) of the Indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the Agency and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds and provided the interests of the Bondholders are not adversely affected, in order to cure any ambiguity or defect or inconsistent provision or to insert ouch provisions clarifying matters or questions; NB170866 - 1- WHHRHAS, the Agency, with the consent of the Trustee, wishes to amend Article XIV, Section 1401 (A) of the Zndenture for the purposes stated in Article X, Sections 1001 (5) and 1001(6) and hereby requests the Trustee to enter into this First Supplemental Trust Indenture; and WHEREAS, all other conditions precedent necessary to amend the Indenture, pursuant to Articles X and XI of the Indenture have been satisfied. NOW, THERHPORE, THIS PIRST SIIPPLffi+4E:NN'PAL TRUST INDHNTURH WITNESSETH, that the Agency and the Trustee, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture agree as follows: 1. Amendm n o Ar i 1 XIV c ion 140T(A). Article XIV, Section 1401(A) of the Indenture is amended to read in full as follows: (A) If the Agency shall pay or cause to be paid, or there shall otherwise be paid, to the Holders of the Honda then Outstanding, the principal and interest and Redemption Price, if any, to become due thereon, at the times and in the manner stipulated therein and in this Indenture, then and in that event the covenants, agreements and other obligations of the Agency to the Bondholders shall be discharged and satisfied. In each event, the Trustee shall pay over or deliver to or at the direction of the Agency all moneys or aecuritiea held by it pursuant to this Indenture which are not required for the payment or redemption of Bonds not theretofore surrendered for such payment or redemption; provided that the Agency shall have received an opinion of nationally recognized bond or tax counsel to the effect that the receipt of such moneys or aecuritiea will not adversely affect the tax-exempt statue of interest on the Bonds; and proviflefl further that in the event such opinion of such counsel directs that the principal balance of any Mortgage Loans are to be reduced, the Agency shall instruct the Trustee of the action to take in order to eo r=_duce such principal balances of such Mortgage Loans. Thereafter, the Mortgage Loans shall be delivered by the Trustee to the Agency or to such other party ae may be directed by the Agency. 2. Effect of F re pntemen aT Tn a Ind n Except as specifically provided in this First Supplemental Trust Indenture, the indenture remains in full force and effect. FJ%70E66 - 2 - 3. Rffectiye Date of First Svnnle_ * 1 Ind n r This First Supplemental Trust Indenture shall take effect upon its execution and delivery. 4. Hx + ion in o+*+roroar a- This First Supplemental Trust Indenture may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. IN WITNHSS WHHRHOF, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Seattle-First National Bank have executed this First Supplemental Trust Indenture by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. RANCHO CUCAMONGA AGHNCY By: Chairman [S H A L] Attest: Secretary SHATTER-PIRST NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee By: Title: v~eroeee - 3 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA RSDHVHLOPMENT AGHNCY and BAN% OP AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, ae Trustee FIRST SUPPLHMHNTAL TRUST INDSNTURH Relating to $36,200,000 Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonde, 1953 Serlea A Dated as of June 1, 1993 fJ8170780 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (Supplemental to the Trust Indenture dated as of March 1, 1983) Relating to the Issuance of the $36,200,000 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1983 Series A THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDBNI"JRE, dated as of June 1, 1993, by and between the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State of California (the "Agency"), and BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, duly organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America and authorized to accept and execute trusts of the character herein set out, and by virtue of the laws of the State of California with its principal corporate truer office located in Loe Angeles, California, ae trustee (the "Trustee"). W I T N 8 T H• WHEREAS, the Agency and Security Pacific National Bank, succeeded by merger by Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, entered into a Trust Indenture (the "Indenture"1, dated ae of March 1, 1983, providing for the issuance of $36,200,000 principal amount of the Agency's Residential Mortgage Revenue Aonda, 1983 Series A (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of which were used to purchase from certain mortgage lending institutions certain home mortgagee (the "Mortgage Loans^) made to finance single-family dwelling unite intended for use as the permanent place of residence by persons of low and moderate income; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(5) of the Indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the Agency and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Honds (as defined in the Indenture), to confozm with the provisions of Section 103 (A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and any applicable regulations or rulings promulgated or issued thereunder, if such modification or amendment, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or tax counsel, will assist in clarifying the applicability of said Section 103(A) to the Mortgage Loans and to the Bonds or will insure that the tax-exempt status of interest en the Bonds is not impaired; WHEREAS, Article X, Section 1001(6) of the indenture provides that the Indenture may be amended by the Agency and the Trustee, without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds and prcvided the intereets of the Bondholders are not adversely affected, in order to cure any ambiguity or defect or inconsistent FHB 1701 80 -1- provision or to insert each provisions clarifying matters or questions; WHEREAS, the Agency, with the consent of the Trustee, wishes to amend Article XIV, Section 1401 (A) of the Indenture for the purposes stated in Article X, Sections 1001 (5) and 1001(6) and hereby requests the Trustee to enter into this First Supplemental Trust Indenture; and WHEREAS, all other conditions precedent necessary to amend the Indenture, pursuant to Articles X and XT of the Indenture have been satisfied. NOW, TfiGREFORB, THIS FIRST SUPPLHDIENTAL TRUST INDENTURE WITNESSETH, that the Agency and the Trustee, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture agree as follows: 1. A nd_ent to Article XIV Section 1401 (A1. Article XIV, Section 1401(A) of the Indenture is amended to read in full ae follows: (A) If the Agency shall pay or cause to be paid, or there shall otherwise be paid, to the Holders of the Bonds then Outstanding, the principal and Interest and Redemption Price, i£ any, to become due thereon, at the times and in the manner stipulated therein and in this Indenture, then and in that event the covenants, agreements and other obligations of the Agency to the Bondholders shall be discharged and satisfied. In such event, the Trustee shall pay over or deliver to or at the direction of the Agency all moneys or securities held by it pursuant to this Indenture which are not required for the payment or redemption of Honde not theretofore surrendered for such payment or redemption; provided that the Agency shall have received an opinion of nationally recognised bond or tax counsel to the effect that the receipt of such moneys or securities will not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of interest on the Honda; and provided Further that in the event such opinion of such counsel directs that the principal balance of any Mortgage Loans are to be reduced, the Agency shall instruct the Trustee of the action to take in order to so reduce such principal balances o£ such Mortgage Loans. Thereafter, the Mortgage Loans shall be delivered by Che 7'.ruetee to the Agency or to such other party as may be directed by the Agency. FJB 7707eu - 2' 2. Hffect of First Sunplemental Trust Indenture. Except as specifically provided in this First Supplemental Trust Indenture, the Indenture remains in full force and effect. 3. Hffective Date of First Suppllemental Indenture. This First Supplemental Trust Indenture shall take effect upon its execution and delivery. 4. Execution in Counterparts. This Pirst Supplemental Trust Indenture may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHERHOP, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Bank of America National TrueC and Savings Association have executed Chia First Supplemental Trust Indenture by their respective duly authorized officers as of Che day and year first above written. RANCHO CUCAMONGA RHDHVSLOPMENT AGHNCY By: Chairman CSEAL] Attest: Secretary BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATYON, as Trustee ey: Senior Authorized Officer r~ei ro~eo - 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 1993 TD: Ma rand Members of the City Council J k Lam, AICP, City Manager FRO Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner REMOVAL OF fl'E1vt FROM CONSENT CALENDAR The Planning Division requests that item no. D.S., "Approval To Reject All Bids For the Chaffey-Gazcia Barn," be removed from the agenda. The low bidder has indicated a willingness to extend his bid while the City continues to explore funding possible sources to cover the cost of construction. ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT QUARTERLY REVIEW PROGRAM 1. REVENUE A. District IncomelDelinquency (Amount and Percentage) B. Grant Funding Income 2. A. Identify Cost SavingslOverages 8. Utility Consumption Review C. Monitor Landscape Density/Maintenance Ratios 3. CAPITAL PROJECT PROGRESS REVIEW A. District Additions B. System Upgrade Activity li,e., moisture sensors, drought-tolerant planting, increased handscape installation) 4. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE MONITORINr3 (FIELD) A. Service Level Compliance B. District Addition Acceptance 5. CUSTOMER SERVICE MONITORING A. Suggestions/Comments B. Complaints C. Communication With District Participants t. District Newsletters 2. City-Wide Grapevine Utilization 3. Surveyslncorporated As Part Of Above 6. OUTSIDE FUNDING RESEARCH A. Grant Funding Application 1. Urban Forest 2. Tree City USA 3. Drought-Tolerance Demonstration Projects 4. Utility Conservation Demonstration Projects 7. OVERALL PROGRAM ACTIVITY A. ConsolidationlElimination Of Existing District Configuration/Portions B. Requests For Establishment Ot New Districts C. Monitoring Of Operational Administration/Overhead Activity D. Development And Implementation Of A Method To Establish Financial Independence From Subsidy/Subvention Funding CJB 6/93 PROPERTY OW[QER LETCER OF PROTEST RECEIVED ..IiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOI CIT.' CLERK Date: 07 June 1993 JUN 0 81993 From: Tim Griggs, 8949 Avalon St,, Alta Loma, Calif. 91701 To: City Clerk, City OF Rancho Cucamonga ~?; 8 LJ~ to i tt i ui r i z I s 1415161 Subj: Proposed Assessment Ref: Notice To Property Owners, Letter, 21 April 1993 This letter is in protest m any increase in assessment of the Landscape Maintenance District No.l, (DistricQ. I have lived in Alta Loma for over two years now and have been inundated with new assessment, ie, "Taxes" lets say what assessments really are. i have watched every "district" increase their assessment, water, sewer, fighting, schools etc. Not is it only district fazes but every utilities bill I receive has an enclosure informing me of a request to the utilities commission m raise rates, extent temporary surcharges, increase 911 fees, add new strcharges, etc. and the State trying to tax anything and every thing. It is a system out of control and the single home owner is footing the bill at a time when over 50% of our incomes is already being paid in up front and hidden fazes. This along with the largest federal tax increase in history waiting to be placed on our shoulders. Where is it going to end; when we loose our homes because we just can't pay the bill. [ feel the time has come that the burden of cost is place on the user. The people that use the parks, trails, schools, etc. must assume the burdrn of paying for it. This should be expanded to all areas were the upkeep is placed on the whole population not just the home owners. Exceptions or discounts for age, religion, or ethnicity must be eliminated as well. Its a play and pay world and the cost must be directed at the users. Raise the usage fees not the taxes. You the City Council must be innovafive, if you choose to spend on improvements look tb where you can cut. Its stupid to put pggers or other vandals in jail; have them sentenced to maintain the parks in the city in which they live, it may instill and develop some community pride as a byproduct of their hard work. When ever t see any notice of public hearings I think it is a farce, you, each of you has already decided to increase the assessment, it is just a way to let people vent I could go on for pages bul these few sentences demonstrate how I feel. I do not support any increase in property a~ecsment. u ..iTY OF R RANCHp CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK JUN 0 7 1993 ~ix~yiioiaiizliLl?141s 6 ~~,/ ~ i~~ G rw+~'i.C- ~' lLi G.G:n_L'~t ;}('c C/j' /~7~79 ~'J3'7~ ~.,re~c-~<ti l(~~ f <u~v.- C ~u~ d~~x ~a,Cfl- 9/7~3 0 .: ~~~ .tip r T~~. ~„~~ ~,~~ ~; ~ , ~n :;_!~6.r/J/y~p~Ly~ ,(u~1 l(.~ 4it~(,'s.c { C4.. a~ X ri,,,.~9(~ tayQZ ~~i'1 CLt tG M'1L. /J rJ ~ ~ ~~. ~Iy~ ~~~~ .q\ ~.~L ,~+ lL,~~ i~N+~ A'P~2.4 ~ J4)~J- 'f.4~4' 'nf ~~C-tt3-- ,!2FX-~GJL .t.th ct~,c~ ~u~`~-a. / .c..~.., r¢ 7Tl-P-C!L'C ~da•ZJt- ~Pfza b-, `~ 'yz d-w~t/Ltiw1. <~ uJ 11~.. Gt .i rv~ .I;2G-~~Lv~ ~r~ n~-v~ ~;jJZ 1`}u.s~L4.j ~. Lf+-~ .: CE'r.CziX-st~ ! ~ rl /tcwtLYv~i / ~ 0 7 >n~~zo- ~,-~~in, Cka~e.~,,~~ _=,~7.a y ~' r ~ .. ~ ~ Z ~' ~w(, u2 L o Giy _7 i1 J 7~ l ! (~ r Y C~ 'I . ._ --.-~K ~ i(lC.t :y.Cir,+/, ~.R,eid z~r'*~, il~! ~~Y~vi.~ p 1 /~ i'`~rv~'r, ._ /ti ;Li~./ZS_ .ry.~I' C~ ~~i.~ %~?r~lr~l.2 .~rtPU~.lnsrl/ R/?1L cr+-~U •!~ d. i L z..Je,2.4-G Z~~. ~{^"-~l~ /LJ~~f..t G~ er-n~Q~ dY~ / /~ .. ~~~,~r..d' /~rP /'r%~-C~ _. ~'~: z~.t~~. ~' r:,tiy~,(C~~CX/!'11.Q .Y~[L. ~Rf.~c+-~ r t1 li.' 1 ~ ;: ~ iI-e c„ t e~ .k~kw-tom c%- ~~ t 4 1.~ cL,7..u ~2a<+r'l s.~t ~ _3 ,t~ee.~a n ae-- "fie' .g~Tr„~~l X~u.., ~Znt~e~' ~«y. C:.ki ~w / ~'~'~~~-~N.(.fl 4~ ;lvl.~. .~(LtA.~JI CAI~d,.9- L~'T ~ l ~~~, ~ p p a .'~~+h- ct,.5-~. Jaw--~.-c'-an-q Jt-scl~. ~,.,~, ~*~E~~~ { _ ~y t~µ . (. t JV y.,tk' c~c. ~JL r «:..vi ~-f-c ~'-~~•-c ~ .~'t-i!t>/\ "\ c~- s-'~ ~, X.~a.'JSt. ~ Cam'-~-t ~ irv~e%. C ~^Y~-~' h.,~..-o. CA- •~ ..(~ic.^-Q... ' r f~~ j ~ V i LI -iL eLCC~ Gl `.V`l U.~ ~IJU--K. .~1^~G` ~ c, W ^C4~ ,~q.y~, n 1'ol C~tlAnv ~~'"Ll~ '~ , 7 // c~..~. ~'u_ C.C . June 5, 1993 ~/" ~~~~' ~O . 7w09 Greenwich Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 The Legislative Body City of Rancho Cucamonga :0500 civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~IIy OF R RECEIVED gHCHO CUCgMONpc CITY CLERK JUN 0 91993 1718'91I0111~12111J 3j4_IS 6 Dear Sirs: I am a resident o£ one of the areas in this city where a levy on landscape and light maintenance is being proposed. I am strongly apposed to this proposal because we, the residents of this community, are already overburdened with so many taxes. Our priorities now are education for our children, food in our stomachs, and the roofs over our heads. Landscaping and lighting in our neighbor- hoods are fairly adequate as they are. These are the least of our concerns in these recessionary times. Our family survival comes first, and I am sure your priorities as people with families are identical with the vast majority of us. We beg you therefore to shelve this proposal for the present. When and if the economy gets better, and family finances follow better economic trends, then perhaps you can reopen this issue again. Respectfully, A ,1 ~ Eft~en Cordura, 5r. April4, 1993 Mark H. Ruttalo 6542 Palomar Court Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701 City Clerk (Sty OlRaacho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Cater Ihive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 To Whom It May Coacera: RECEIVED O~TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONr,A CIIY CLERK JUN 0 91993 ~8191011112i1 2i 3~g516i to response to your notice [o "onnsider the kwyand colkclion of m auwoment..for District no. 2". Pkxse be notified that I em in total oppodtioo to this "tax'. My wife and I moved fro®Ontario Lrt year. We punfia~ed a'book tspo" home end have hesn Pa5'in8 ProPMY taxes ao amut~ higher asseesmat of the homer We have fibd for a roduood pmpesty tax based oo the reduced vacua of the homer And now (Ifrlorc we can even get ovr roduoed ptoperiy tax ),Rancho Cucamonga wane to make another asseasmmt. I know I malt for marry cabs I say, "ENOUGH ALREADY". How do you civic leaden expert vs to survive thin year of taxes, taxes and moro taxes. We need a rWik from taxes not more of them) You have shady ittereased the utility faxes (evert though the community spoke out against it} You want to increase "property faxes" but 6ecauu of the Proposition 13 which needs a 2/3rd majority vote of the community, you cunt. imtwd you crate throe •asseaamab" to tdtumtvat ow vote and you ask fm our opitdonsT Will you listen to uaT Whet abort the omioow Measuro U that we arc about to vote on which if passed will incrwx the sales tax by 1/2°AT Morc mxesl Our rooettUy ekxxad Prcaidat t7inton has plans for ova more texea We are about to expxieuce the kergwt tax iuctase in emerican history. We arc oo the verge of a new "payroll tax" courtesy of the Clintons m pay for universal healthcare. The estimates on that run mywherc from 7 to 12 •AIIIIII. Do you think thex taxes will help our economy? Do you think our empJoyen ail(mke a 12'k wtT Do you think our bwinwsw can withstand the onslaught of ioa'ased payroll taxes, workman's comp premiums, and excessive regulations? V you do then you truty do not hear what Rags Perot described as "the great big sucking wand". EIe of course was referring to jobs lost to Mexico but 1 am referring to the many good citizem and business leaving California in droves. Pkax do cot increase our taxwl s~Y, Mark H. Ruffulo NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE ISHEREBYCNEN That the CITYCOUNCILnf theCFfYOF RANCHOCUCAMONGA,CALIFORMA, did, on the 21st day of April, 1993, adopt its Resolution of Intention, receive and file a "Report" of the Engineer, and authorize a Bme and place for two public hearings N consider the levy and collection ofanassessmentduring Fiscal Year 1993-1994 within an existing landscape maintenance disMCt known and designated as landscape Maintenance District No.2 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), The Engineer's "Report" has been prepared and approved, consisting of the plans and specifialions describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the mst of the maintenance, and diagram and assessment, and for all particulars as to Nese proceedings, reference is made b said'Report" as preliminarily approved and on file with the transcriptof these proceedings. DFS('RIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT'S TO BF MpIN*AINFD The proposed improvements to be maintained under these proceedings for this District are described as The landscape improvements maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, equestrian trails and 27.5 acres o(parks Mtroughout the Victoria Planmd Community. These parks consist of Kenyon Park, Vichiria Groves Park, VinUge Park and Wirdrowa Park. m±OPOSFD A ~-CCESSM~ The assessment proposed to be levied on the property shown by the Assessor's roll of the County of San Bernardino as being owned by you is set forth in the following itemization of the assessment mte for the disMd: laodllse Iyye 1lnits Bate FaGtai A.Ll. Rexenue Single Family Parcel 3,763.00 5472.00 I.0 5422.1q 51,587,990 Mu10-Family Parcel 124.00 5422,00 1.0 5422.00 552,370 Commercial Acre 15.74 5422.00 2.0 5844.00 517,280 Vacant Acre gyy,Qp y312.00 0.25 510550 ~SZ33!! TOTAI S 4,40(1.74 S1.7tK )7llc PROCEEDINGS Said proceedings for this annual assessment levy within Bte DisMct shall be had end taken pursuant hr the "landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Division 15 of the-Streetsand Highways Codeof the Stateof California). PUBI IC HFpRIN /PR STS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TWO (2) PUBLIC HF.ARINCS ARE HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE RECUI.AR MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATNE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CHIC CENTER, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ON THE FOLLOWING DATES AND TIMES: A. FIRST' PUBLIC IiF.ARING: MAY 19,1993, AT 7;OC P.M. B. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: )fRJE 16,1993, AT 7:Iq F.M. AT TF1AT TIME THE LEGISLATNE BODY WILL CONSIDER AND FINALLY DEFGRMINE WHETHER TO LEVY THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, AND TO HEAR ALL PROTESTS RELATING TO SAID PROPOSED PROCEEDINGS, OR THE ESTIMATE OF THE COST AND EXPENSE OF THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE, OR THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT; AND ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTER- Kenneth & Mary Unq_er 5357 Cov9 na F1. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (90A-999-9E68 RECEIVEG ~Iry OF ggNCHO CUCAMONG~ CITY CLERK °r'- e. '~~~ JUN091993 n?hra 4dams, ,:,i tv f:lerk 7f INI9110L11111 I_ 2__~'~4 X5161 ..,i,rv ,,~( r'ai ,'ho Cur:+mnnga '0500 Civir~ ~?=nt=r Pri ve f~.~nr he i ,. :,.; ,..,a, fA 917^4 F; =nql nG= over T would lip= to question the enclns<A Elvers and T have m~c~h=~-d !h•~ f1v=i to cnri==p"nd with my giwvtinn~ ~nA s t.qt=ment :. 1. {7~. 000 u~r ar:re for Land srapi nq sounds outr.~u=ous to ma . ni nn min - ! h,n T ran ~. ,e ~ nn :Ini nq. 9. Whv arm w=. havi m: to pav for landsn.api ny that doea not ..v.n -.• r" T> i rh.u .i o.:l ?h= itv fog snmrthina }hat Ai.. nnf r.ei ;+ T wn~~,lrl he sr:cusad of fr,anA. -. ..~ - -.F f-, .- r1;= ifv .1n anv lenAs~,api n~o inai nten.ann= i nsiAe 1h.= r~r c:ntwondr!'r at;f A•pain are we hFi na char a_=A for .. Thi: :~~ain i~~. nutramenu^~. ,. W=.II wl,^; f.:11inG 1h= ?iu+h^ 0. H-~w dr. i tinA nut what aa,usie fonteq~ thv r:i by is i.r r„ hr,~:.~ 7 .: n, y - „f one nFinhhnr whr+ wq. i,ei na ~ia=~: sFr1 slmn:h 3000 :q ft~f nr a 91(10 .n Ph hnmP. T ,,~ ~ ~ ;~.. wl-; ., i `r, I, 1,. ;. ^tr•ei uht~n ut the m-^.s_ Wl;v a. ., w~ the n~,lv .p pgyi r.q for t1onA rnnti nl~ ~. A.....~ ~ ,ui~." 1ik= . n r.rnvi n4 Fnr cnm-ihlnq w~ ara nh ~- ..; v:n~. n,.as fh,~ %.i by r~,.~imoil think thah iueh hNr an :e we war'- .q Frl= to ~. iii, h'.¢.. ~ w hnn;~, wo h:;vn a~, nnl lmS tort ti~;urc= of mnnevv A ~~~~; ~:1 rn.+nv of is •tra lu=+ .7~Ptina by as it is wi hh trulav's ~r•:rmv, TI ..,u~~d~ li6t .,ni=<~iw wq nis to inx ii, nut of our• h-~mn , n,l i f !',=v r;,an not do i 1 wi th prop~~~r ty h.a ~;ea hhtiv wi l l do ~.+ wi'h =~:. •. rnr•n?^:. T` 1hi=~ kFeps un IL•=. ocnnl~ will ~.onll Annt her Prop 13 revnl t. i Ann'h mi nA paying for what T '.m aGt}i.^.c h:~t it s~-rns +n m= +;,ai we ArP oavi no for .~ lot thin} WF ArF niit r?rp;j yj 0~. OI' SOmP.One ?1sA lp P/C~i Vj n~]. .•:P P(e11P ::. W> .-q n. q1 WA V,9 ralO-mlJ ~%I il': F„ice YI11 n~} A~' ~1P 00115 ~~nm~= n=x} =1?cti nn. k~nn=rpL%~ DID YOU RECEIVE THE TAX ASSESSMENT NOTICE? YOUR TAXES ARE GOING UP -- FOR CITY LANOSCAPINGII! DID YOU KNOW THAT NORTH STIWANDA RESIDENTS ARE PAYING S22.000 PER ACRE TO THE CITY JUST TO MAINTAIN LANDSCAPING IN OUR DISTRICT? DID YOU KNOW THAT LANDSCAPING ACREAGE INCLUDES SUBDIVISIONS THAT ~ ARE NOT EVEN BUILT? DID YOU KNOW THAT LANDSCAPING ACREAGE INCLUDES THE GRASS GREBNWAYS 3 THAT ARE WATERED AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS? ~ DID YOU KNOW THAT OVER $65,000 (164) OF THE LANDSCAPING BUDGET CONSISTS OF DBLINOLENT TAEES7 WE'R8 PAYING OTHER PEOPLE'S TAXBSI! NOW, THE CITY WANTS TO INCREASE YOUR TAXES FOR LANDSCAPINGI _ THE CITY SAYS IT ZS DU6 TO A RATE INCREASE BY THE WATER COMPANY. S THE WATER COMPANY SAYS THEIR RATE REPRESENTS ONLY Z3 OF THE CZTY'S PROPOSED INCREASE? NNO'8 TELLING US TH6 TRUTHT7ll SPECIAL ASSBSSMENTS ARE BASED ON THE SQUARE POOTAGE OP YOUR NONE. b SOME OP YOUR NEIGHBORS HAVE DISCOVBRSD THAT CITY RECORDS SHOW OUR HOUSES TO BE IaSOSB THAN THEY ACTUALLY AREI 7 THE CITY BLAMES THE DEVELOPBR, THE pEVELOPEA BLAMES THE CITY. WE DON'T CARE WHO'S TO BLAME -- WE'RE GETTING A REFUND -- ARE YOU? RESIDENTS OF NORTH ETIMANDA ARE THE SOL~NTRIBU ORS TO PAY FOR FLOOD CONTROL IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. HOWEVER WE ARE PAYING FOR STREET LIGHTING DIS ~'RICTS PRIMARILY ON THE WEST SIDE OP TOWN. IT'S NOT FAIRI JOIN YOUR NEIGHBORS AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ,TUNE 2 AND 16 AT 7 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Can't Attend? Send your written protest by dune 16 to: Debra Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 T H E C I T V O F ' ~ n Nc no June 10, 1993 C U C n M O N G n Thomas C. Bawl es 11991 Norwlck Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'739 Dear Mr. Bowles: We have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the Cib Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Heckett, at 989- 1867., extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPRRTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Wi~~O'Ne1~ City Engineer WJO:~h Mayor Denrns L. stout councilmember William J. Alexar•~, Mayor Pro4em Charlef J eupuet II _ COUneilmember Diane Williams Jack lam. AIC P, CIP/ Monaget councilmember nex Gutierrez X0500 Civic Centel Onve PO Bo. 801 f7o ncho Cucomon9o~CA 91729 (909)aB9.1651 - l~li ~ ~~h~ . tloe'f H d Mr,~ ` u~il ifa.r . JUN 0 719~i f t ti T H E C 1 T V O F R~ NC Ii0 C UC ~ MONG ~ June 10, 1993 Tile Griggs 8949 Avalon Street Rancho Cucaaanga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Griggs: Ne have received your letter of protest in regard W the yroposed 1993/94 assessax!nt for the Landscape and L1ghting D1strlcts. The C1ty Council M111 take your letter Into consideration at the puD11e hearing on June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the Ctty Council Chaeban, 10500 C1vic Center Dr1ve. If you have arty questions, please contact Ms. Luclnde Meekett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340• Sincerely, COIMINITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Ni111ae1 J 'Nett C1ty Engineer NJO:~h Mayor Dennis L Stout Councikrrember WIIAOm J. Alezontler Mayor Pro4em Charles J. Buquel II Councflmember Diane Wiaartu Jack lam. AICP, City Manager Counclknember Rez Gutierrez IOS~ Cbw Center OtlvB P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91720 (909) 099-I6aI fAX i9,M:' +n7 a;. PROPERTY OWNER IEITER OF PROTEST .:ITV ()F gIYCLEflK Date: 0'1 June 1993 JUN 0 81993 Flom: Tim(higgs,g949Ava1aSt.,AIlaLow,Cali£91701~yia~9lrelllln1t12131alslal To: City Clerk, City Of Rmtcho Cuamooga Subj: Proposed Assasmmt Ref: Nods To Property Ownets, Later, 21 Apnl 1993 This later is in protest b soy iatKase in auevammt of the Ltodfppe Mainteaaott Dlstrict No.l, (District). I have lived is Ala Loma far aver two yea row sad lrm txeo inuodsbd with new aavessmeat, x. 'Taxer` less say what atresrmma rally are. I lrva watrJled every 'district' increave the ataeament, water, neuter, >id~g, achods ere. Not b tt only district axes but every utilities bill I reodw hers as enclaona iotaemiq me of a roqumt b she u47iUa aommissiaa b raise sass, oxsmt amchatga, itttaeate 911 laser, add new wchuSa, etc. and she Serb trying b mt myt6iog rod avail tMog. n fs a ayakm oat at eoonol sad the siagk home ovmer is footing the trig at a time who awr SOli d oa incomes is shady bai>q paid in up front and hiddrn mra. TMr abog with the hagat fadenl tat iortene io history waiting b be placed as oar ahouWr+s. Whore i, it gaiog b end; whoa vro loose oa homes because we just wo't pay the bill. I fed the time has come Mat the buMar of Dort is phs:a oo the user. The people dot use the parks, trails, achdols, ac. mart assume the tKndea of paying fait. TMs should be expanded to all areas vane the upkeep is placed oa the vrhob poputWoo sot just the home owners. Exoeplioru a diaoowia for ago, religion. a et6r~y attar be a as well. Ia a phy sad pay world and the Dort must be dheaed at the ann. Raire the usage foes not tlb area. You the City Council must be iMOVative, if yon choose b apmd m improvaoata bok b whore you can cut. Ia atuptd ro put aggas a other vandals M jail; haw them aaotatoed m maintain the parlo io the city is wMch they live, tt may imMlt tad davetop acme community pride as a byproduct of lhar had cork. When suet I roe any notice of public haeinga I think it is a fares, you, each of you ho shady decided b iacrtne the a»ermeot, it is juvt a way m la people vent. 1 could go as far pages but Wwe few smtettcaf demoaanta how I feel. 1 do not snpport soy hsesere b property awaarateet. T H E C I T V O F RI1 NC I-IO C UCt1 MONG ~ June 10, 1993 Louise Patton 7373 Ambrosia Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Ms. Patton: Ne have received your letter of protest 1n regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter into constderetion at the public hearing on June i6, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 10500 C1vtc Center Drive. If you have aqy questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTPENT ENGINEERIIM DIVISION Ni111am O'Neil City Engineer MJ0:,1h MoVOr Oennls L. Stout Cbuncilmember Wllhom J. Alekono0+ Mayor Prodem Charles J. Buquet II _ Councllmrmber Diane Williams Jack Lom. AICP, City Manager Councllmember RBx Gutierrez 10500 Cinc. Centel Dnve P.0 Bow d07 honcho Cucamonga, CA 91749 (909) 9a9~1857 vAe :0'; ~°+ ~ :, M11YK~v~~y vNVI~11~A\VI~ / ~V~'°'~'V~' / LV-"4l\-.. CITYCIEHK ~j373 ~'•~-~a--IPd JUN 071993 ~~,K,~ ~ s,~„~,~- (~ ~.. 9/7.3c 171819~1Oj ll11311121941516j a, / 9y3 -------- --- ------ LD~--°-D _ ,~-~-~ -~--°~ ---- - ._ --- ---------- ------ --- ----~_~~~~ _a~w~----- --- _.....---_______.----------~----- - -- ------- ------~--~-a:~..~y - -- ~-------~-- =_~' ~(~rt.w~t ~--- _ ~-`~-•0--~'.. _,?~_ L~-?. u-L T jam- .. _..... V A V /~ tn%r-Z`U?"__,uc~3Lza.._9-4r!-~.e~, .~a/tl~'-g~..2+~s,¢w~~z~iCl.~:.. ,~.t. - - --------. -u .. a4 i. ., ' , ~ ct:~ ~ ~, _..-. __ _ ----- ._..,.q___.~ ,, /~ _. _ o._... ~..~p /1a-CSL_!hi~d2¢p~_~d2(~pGy{'~~f{f~ . ,~ QL~+~- 41 _p~e_, _ . ._ .. --~ - - -^'L.s~9~ / it 9 ' .._ _ .. C h - ~ ~-- ---._ ~- -' ~~/--~ -~.~. -~n-~~ ---•-_-_._~..--'--' ------ -,-... _ _ .. _ ... _ . ~1L N'~-- ~1~~ can , o a _ e-~. ~Y ° . ~ __._ .. ~.. n ~-._. --'---°-----^-',`!`.._c^'n'--_.~1~,,-G Gv~SL~_.111i,..~R..~ Jl,trn l~2 a.~ ~~q C1u~3Lly •~ _!~~__ _ j..~~~--- -Y...~. , _-...----- .~ .. n .._~._._..__...,.,L-~-~~i._~..C`.'N_-44,p~.~_p!~-~.~'in°uhr'1c =i 'L~ _SZ\-Xd_^"e%__.__ _.. _ ..... -------~--_.... .._._ _. _.. _ ..._... - ---- - r-~ __.... T H E C ~ ~ N C ~~ O June 2, 1993 Gary J. and Sharon L. Repp 9919 Timbennist Court Alta Loma, CA 91737 Dear Gary and Sharon Repp: Y O C U C n 1~1 O N G t1 This letter is in response to your letter of May 26, 1993, regarding the recommended increase 1n landscape and Lighting Districts. We would like to expplain that your roperty is located within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Q1ght Maintenance Districts No. 1 and 2. Currently the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 is ;72.47• Street Lighting Distrlct No. 1 is f13.81; and Street Lighting Dtstrlct No. 2 15 (29.30. The proposed rates for fiscal year 93/94 for the districts 1s Landscappe Maintenance District No. 1 is 592.21, Street Lighting Maintenance Distrlct No. 1 1s 517.77, and Street L1 hung Dtstrlct No. 2 1s f39.97. The increased amount for assessment, cumulatively is f34.37 per year or 52.86 per month. These assessments are used to maintain tandscaptng 1n Landscape District No. 1 and to maintain street 11 his and traffic signals in Lighting Districts 1 and 2. Please be aware the City 1s very concerned with keeping the maintenance dl5trict rates as low as possible. Ne have installed various water savinggs features to reduce cost and use water saving planting wherever possible. 4e will continue these efforts 1n the future. In answer to your concern regarding the Sports Complex, this facilityy was constructed Por adult use freetn9 existing parks for children's activities. The revenues from the Sport Complex are used for the maintenance of the lighting and landscaping of the complex. Your letter will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at the public hearings on June 2, and June i6„ 1993 at 7:00 p.m. 1n the City Council Chamber, 10500 Civic Center Drive. 1` y_Q40have arty questions, please contact Lucinda Hackett, at 989-1862, extension 22aa Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING/DIVISION i~j~r'~ ,IJ~Z(c~Cl, William J, NeTI City Engftt€er MJO:dIw Mavor Denrns L Stout Councilmember William 1 Alexantler M moor a; o.ram ChorlesJ Bu puef II } r-r i~ Councdmamber Diane Wnlioms ~or,F Lon, ~~IC P, Cary Manager Counalmember Rex Gutierrez ~~ vtru~ ~. .~~; r_rtn~ei fxrwn ~ v rJ 9a BOl Rn~cno rucomongn. Ga 9r 12~ rGfW) 99V~1851 r... .~ ~; rvr ~ ... stay 21, 1993 ~ ~IfV ~ '~jrk C¢t~ or i'+ancho Cucamonga i~. Ji1C ~.~..~:~ciltel' u17.2 !Zanch^ C~~c.imansa, C.4 Qt729 .:~r~ ~~ark RECEIY® ,.TTY OF RANCNG ClN.AYONG~ CITY CLERK MAY 2 6 1993 X71 ~~911e11111211121314561 Lc . ~~~1 ~~~ ~~ '.Ve tc^v!d !ike to resister this formal protest against increased property taxes in our ntv ~ T+e r'urrent property taxes are already too high. Any increase would surely put a burden on our household. With the state of the economy, the layoffs taking place m ;his region, and the fad that most dty residents who have been able to keep !heir jabs have not received an increase in salary in over five years (which Is our nosmonl, it seems almost ridiculous that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would plan co increase our taxes. \bmy don't you turn off the lights at our new stadium, instead of charging us for mcreaced Tight bills The stadium has both of us in an uproar. It surely was an ~~blect o. decen .eiran you asked us to vote on a wonderful new city park to provide a ~;laca .`+a :,ur children to play, and the Nrst thing you built was asemi-pro stadium. '~'. h,v a ^c~cM t~'here wtll the children play? Why was this semi-pro sports team never menh~med m nur ballots, when we supported more parks for the eammuniw? !t ^~. rur ^,:;! :nrennnn M refuse to vote for the mayor and all other coundl memtxrs whs~ were to omce during this decision and deceit. We am so angry about this semi pro stadium m a wmmunity that is supposed to support education and play array for the ch~ldran. [t you ask us, we refuse any addltionat taxes, and look forcard :n rcplacins the members on the City Counal with those who truly care ahnut our crnnmunity. '~~';~~ ~uerely. Cary iIR~ o/ / ~L Repp ~' /,O v979 Timbermist Court ,41ta Loma, CA 41737 ,~o/-~~/ ~.3 72 YGS<5 .~tj ~ . M~ -% /~ i; 13~.'r-- T H E C I T V O F ~ l1 N C N O C li C t1 M O N G t1 June 2, 1993 Jeffrey and Nancy Rumage 13997 San Dimas Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rumage: This letter is to response to your letter of Mqy 24, 1993 regarding the proposed increase in assessments for the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 anA 2. d like t0 take this opportunity to explain cts. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 Light Maintenance District No. 1 and No The notice you received does recomaend an L annual rate for Landscape Maintenance Light Maintenance District No. 1 1s aance District No. 2 is f29.30. The prod for the districts 1n Landscape Maintenance Light Maintenance District No. 1 is ranee District No. 2 is f39.97. The lncr lively is f16.25 per year of f1.35 per month these are not new assessment was forwled Tn June 1989 and 2 were formed 1'n August, increase in the rate. The District No. 7 is f305.43, 113.81 and Street Llghung Fosed rates for fiscal year District No. 7 15 f307.05 (17.77, and Street Light eased amount of assessment, Please be aware that parks are not constructed with Assessment District funds. The assessments are used to maintain landscaping in Landscape District No. 7 and to maintain street lights and traffic signals in Lighting Districts 1 and 2. The City has obtained property locateA on the east side of East Avenue, north of Summit for the Construction of a comaFUnity park when funds become available. Your letter will bgge forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at Counc11b1Chamber 11DSOOnCivle Center Drive 16,If199u sho ld have an in the City Y y questions, please contact tuclnda Hackett, at 989-1862, extension 2340. 5lncerety, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIYISION ~~~ 2Co~G Nilltam 'Neil City Eng neer NJO:d1w Mayor Dennis L. stout Councilmember William J. Alexqnqer ~!q•IOr RrP i9m f_hq•IeSJ Buqu el II ~>~' •~., Councilmembel Digne Willigm5 .oc~ ~qrn. AIC P. Cary Mqnqger Counctlmember Rex ,uherrez ~OSrq r.i~ir. ': erd e~puve 00 Box 50~ R9nchn ^.acamengo. CA 91)2G (9p9)989~1851 FA;r ~>„ Maq 24, 1993 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 c~ . ~ 1~ RECEIVED n J ..lTY OF RAtlC11O CUCAMr~.IG~` CITY CLERK m( , , / MAY 2 61993 i7B'9j1Uj 11112 112131415161 RE: Property Owners Notices dated'April 21, 1993 Dear Sir: This letter is to serve as a protest for the recent proposed assessments of landscape improvements end street lighting for Dlstricta No. 7, No. 1 and No. 2 dated April 21, 1993. Through both our annual property and special aeaesament taxes (Mello-Roos), we are currently paying f400 monthly of community taxes. Ae 3 year residents of the new North Etiwenda community, we are aware the[ there will 6e ongoing costa for the Improvements of the i®ediate aces. However, ae resldevta, we have contributed our fair share of taxes and cannot rithetand any further regular increases. Furthermore, these taz inczeeaee hove been Eor improve~enta on the outskirts of the region we live in. Aa of yet, we have not seev any improvements in parks, public facilities, walkways, end lighting that sub- stantiate these extreme increases. Unfortunately, if both the city and the county continue to impose further tax collections that ere not warranted collectively by Che residents of this community, than homeowners such as ourselves will 6e forced to reside else- where. Please, as a final thought, I am sure all of you are tazpayera as well. Isn't $400 per month in taxes enough financial burden for one family to endure? Sincerely, ~' w~ ~G%n d Jeffrey and Nancy Rumage 13997 Sen Dlmea Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 PH: 909-899-0462 a~6- aj/-3S T.2. i3sbs _ a ', ; ,,U ~Sc t~ ~ ` ~ r ,, ~ ~ _ 1 N E C I T V O F R n Nc Ho c uc n M o ~c n June 15, 1993 Richard Carmona 13935 Claremont lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Cannons: Ne have received your letter of protest 1n regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting O1strlcts. The City Council will take your letter Into consideration at the public hearing on June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Lenter Drive. If you have arty questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMfINITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION N111iam J. 'Nell Ciiy Engineer WJO:~h cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Idayo~ Dennis l Stout CouncilmemCer Williom J Alexonoo~ Mayor Pro~rem Charles J 9uq~ret II ~y!-~ ~. CoUnalmember Dio ne Wrllla m5 !a~:k Lam, AIf P, Gfy Monager CoUnnlmem her Rex GUtiertei ~l 105'10 C~w,t'~nfei pour ~ PO Bo.+BOJ Ro nano Cucamonga pP 01129 (N919B9~IB51 -.. , ~~~. -- C~r~e~ ~Rn;c~Yo Cuc,A'rnoNrrA, -- --- !'L . ~ ~n-.a~ "~ ~~~~ja~ -I~~s .s my ~R~~~ Przor~sT of INCR~s~s "gyp IT1 CReRS ~s I N S l--D'~ ~ S L fJ ~ ~ P~~9 Lm~`` 7. S. ~Eq~s-r -r~~r No iNGRe~~s °r~K~ e~~~. FuR~fdt>;RCnoR~ T- ~~qu~sr RN ~XPI.A~n~IK~n?_. o~ At-L S~nDC~rs Sttr~w~~G p~ND I'~~Y+'I~ZiNCf f}~~5 ~l~l~s(c~~LU~ COU~R~I O~N9 Cos-r" 7C~S.'1"l>%t~.~TCoNs. --- --- --- - 1-0O It -- . ~f1 CtU/_~R~ .. _! b Pt55 g~55~-~_~. DECI~~S~S INS"r~9 of __1NC~~S~~_D~,t~_. TO ou1Z pi~~I,CUI.T__~GOhiot~,(,c, _'Tin1~S._ _-.- `11.4% -~~~na. CITY OF RM~HO CUCAMONGA CfTY CLERK dUk 161993 1718191101111121 fi 2i J1415161 T H F C I 7 V O F R t1 N C I-I O C U C t1 iii O N G ~~ June 10, 1993 Richazd Catmona 13935 Clazemont Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Deaz Mr. Carmona; This is in response to your letter that was received at the City Council meeting on June 2, 1993. The following information is in answer to your questions: 1. Enclosed herewith is a plot map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 that shows the landscape areas, Community Trails and windrows that the district maintains. What the map does not show is all the street trees that aze also maintained by the district. 2. The §30,000 figure for landscape plant material renovations is an estimate of what it will take to replace trees and shrubs in aeeas prone to extreme wind damage. 3. The §6,0(!0 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site is a figure that comes from a quote from the County of San Bernardino. It would be less expensive to disk the site but this is rot possible because it is located in a soil erosion control zone and disking creates to much dust that could be blown away. The site carrot be left natural because it is a fue hazazd. 4. A detailed breakdown of maintenance and operations is as follows: Backflow testing 51,670.00 Misc. (electric, plumbing) 5560.00 Materials, supplies, tools 5560.00 Chemicals 52,360.00 Decomposed Granite S1b70.00 Fence repair parts 52,220.00 TOTAL §10,420.00 5. Assessment Administration and Administrative/General Overhead represent the City's attempt to operate the maintenance districts as a business. These charges pay for the overhead attributable to the district's operation. These costs are calculated as 7.5% of the total distriM revenue plus 55.41 per Mgvor Dennis 1. Stout ~ Councilmember William J. Alexonde~ MayerPro~tem Chotlea J. auquef ll }~'~~ ~ Councllmember Diane Willioms Jack Lam, AiCP, G)y Mongger Councilmembel Rex Gulievez IOSCO Civic Cenlei 0nve PO BOx 901 ponc00 f,~camongo, C/91749 (909)9891951 ~+• parcel. As with any business it is important to understand what overhead costs are. Overhead costs include such things as staff time ro prepare the assessment information for the County, processing of bills, computer time, utilities, mailings, publications, attorney fees and various personnel costs cot directly billed ro other budgeted items. 6. dr 7. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 is showing a current tax delinquency rate of 14.9%. The City must take into account this delinquency when it is balancing each district's budget. If and when the back taxes are paid, these funds go into each district fund balance. These funds can only go to the district for which they were intended and cannot be spent on anything else but the maintenance of that particular diatritL in the future, these funds can be used ro keep assessment rates low or the fords can be rebated ro the property owners within the district. We will investigate ro see tf it is possible to show a line item in the Engineer's Report that shows collected delinquent taxes from prior years. 8. Cucamonga County Water District (CCWDJ has quoted the City a 5% increase in domestic and a 7% increase agricultural rata effective July 1, 1993 and another rate inaease of 5% for domestic and 5% for agricultural rate effective January 1, 1994. This information was combined to a letter dated April 16, 1993 fmm Shawna Whallon, Manager of Finance foe CCWD. A coPY of this letter Ls attached for your review. In preparing the 93/94 fiscal yeaz budget for the districts and the Geneal Fund an average tnaeaee of 8.59'o was used ro calculate the water utilities amount. 9. Please see attached letter dated June 14,1993. 10. Street Light Mainbnance Dbhict No.l b used ro fund the maintenance of street lights and trafRc signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within the district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and such those cosh assodated with the maintenance of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 is used to fund the maintenance of street light located on local street through out the City but excluding those azeas already In a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential azea located west of Haven Ave., but there aze part of the district located in the North and South EBwanda area. A response to the Community Facilities District issue will be sent under separate cover. 11. Public safety is a major concern in this City, and fuming off every other street light would afftct the safety of you and every resident In this City. 12. A tesporee to this question will Ue sent under separate cover. If you need clarification on any of these issues or have any further questions, please contact me at (909) 989-1862. Cordially, Community Development Department Engineering Division Willi~ a ~i~~%~ City Engtneer Enclosures WJN:CH cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ' T H E C I T y O F R t1 N C K O C U C t1 NI O N G ~~ June 14, 1993 Mr. Richard Carmona 13935 Claremont Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Carmona: This letter serves as a follow-up to our telephone conversation and subsequent meeting regarding the alleged over assessment of your property within Community Facilities District Nos. 88-1 and 88-2. rn conducting the research to ascertain the square footage of your home, I realized that the tract map that your lot is a part of, along with two other traM maps were not approved by the City but were approved by the County. I have enclosed a copy of the building permit iaeuad by the County for your ]ot (APN 226-221-33) that shows a total square footage of 2612 square feet minus the garage. This number is within the range for the Residential Class II rate of Community Faalities District Nos. 88.1 and 88-2. Therefore, the special taxes being assessed against your property is consistent with Lhe building permit. If I can be of additional service, please do not hesitate W give me a call at (909) 989-1851 extension 2567. Respectfully, ndY.Bli3r GIS/Special Districts Supervisor IYB:de cc: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Mayor & Members of the City Council Moyol (]BnnIS 1, Sloul COUnCtlmember WilliOm J. AIerC^C~..i Moyoi PiO ~'am Cnanes J Buquet II COUnCAmembel Dione Wd6om5 Jack lam. AICP. Cay Monoger Counalmembar Res Gunenea IOSOe Cn~c Cemei Cnve a06o+tl07 eancno Cucamonga. CA 01730 wp0)090~Ia51 l~ZT^i~ CUCAMONGA COUNTY Apr1116, 1993 ~; /`/ .., ~~ v GEORGE A. KUYKENDALL -~~. v,..c.,r ATER DISTRICT JEROME M. WILSON Mr. Rtek Gomez Community Development Director The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Mr. Gomez, <. ; i have received your letter dated April 12, 1993, and I apologia for any confusion that may have resulted Crom my letter. However I have discussed on several occasions with your Associate Engineer, Cindy Hackett. what the proposed water rates for Fiscal Yeaz 93-94 will be. I will be recommending that the Hoard increase the water consumption rates as follows: S'.Sd17SRL Domestic $.79 ccf Pazks and Rec. $.67 ccf T~OFq''gE/,`F~~F T.EENOLLENEERGER u1i. .... D a~rna. ROBERT NEUFELU ~ ~~'R ~ ~~ ~ ~~~^'~•n4~CHARLES A. WEST Bg, P .9o JEFFREY A. CARTER ~.~, •7 7, Proposed Proposed 7-1-93 1-1-94 $.83 ccf $.87 ccf $.72 ccf $.76 ccf The Domestic rate would Increase 5% on July 1, 1993, and' 5% on January I, 1994, and the Pazks and Recreation rate would increase 7% on July 1, 1993, and 54b on January 1, 1994. We will be attending the Public hearings for the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts. Please let me know where and when the meetings will be held, and we would very much like a copy of the proposed budgets prior to the meetings. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed water rates, or need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, --- \ Shawna Whallon Manager of Finance cc: Jack Lam, A[CP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, AdminlstraUve Services Director 4fiA 5AN OERNARDINO RO.'RANCH000CAMONCA,CA 9171V~W38'P.O.80%NB•(911919P7~25Y1 •Pnx P'u'n ~i, T H E C I T '/ p p ~~1 ~C KO C UC ~~ ~O ti~G ~1 June 15, 1993 Roberta Copper 12574 Nasturtiem Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91734 Dear Ms. Copper: Thank you for your recent letter regrading your concerns for the proposed increase in the Landscape and Lighting Districts. Your letter will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at the public hearing on June I6, 1993. The following information is in answer to your questions regarding the breakdown of expenses for LMD No. 2: 1. a) Yictoria has 27.5 acres of parks which consist of Kenyon Park, 4lctoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. These parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews while the Community Trails throughout Victoria are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. The 88.12 acres of ground cover, shrubs and turf areas in the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. b) The fringe benefit amount in the Engineer's Report is for the personnel budgeted 1n Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. The fringe benefits include vacation time, sick leave and medical insurance. c) Maintenance and Dperations includes materials, supplies, toots, fertilizer, chemicals, soil and top dressing, decomposed granite for the trails, brick dust for the ball fieids, sand for the tot lots, mulch for the planter areas. It also includes fence repair maintenance, back flow testing, electrical and piumbing repair. Vehicle Maintenance and operations covers the maintenance and repair of the vehicles that are used by Ctty crews who maintain the parks and trails in Victoria. d) As stated in part "a", the parkways, median Islands and paseos are maintained under contract 6y a private landscape maintenance company. Also, the trees in Victoria (including street trees) are maintained by a private tree maintenance contractor. Moyer Denras l Srouf Councilmember William J Alexontler ~•~"~VO~r"e rCm /j iy atleSJ P.U oiler li Cour cJrnem bP.r Diane Williams n:•..•r ••, ai~a :;ny rylonnger Counr. Imember Rex GUberez ~~~ ~r'"r •.. «~~~ ~.r nO Aqv Ant nn~ano Gn:omon.JO CA 9r749 rGOV1 R8G~t 951 oe. RCeERTA COPPER LANDSCAPE b LIGHTING DISTRICTS June 15, 1993 Page 2 e) Assessment Administration and Administrative/General Qverhead charges pay for the overhead attributable to the district's operation. These costs are calculated as 7.5% of the total district revenue plus S5.41 per parcel. As with any business it is important to understand what overhead costs are. Overhead costs include such things as staff time to prepare the assessment information for the County, processing of 61115, computer time, utilities, mailings, publications, attorney fees and various personnel costs not directly billed to other budgeted items. f) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is showing a current tax delinquency rate of 9.7%. The City must take into account this delinquency when 1t is balancing each district's budget. When the back taxes are paid, these funds go 1nW each districts Tund balance. These funds can only go to the district for which they were intended and cannot be spent on anything else but the maintenance of that particular district. In the fuWre, these funds can be used W keep assessment rates low or the funds can be rebated to the property owners within the dl5trict. Please know that the Niking and Riding Trolls Master Plan you refer to 1s a Regional Trail System. At this time there are no plans for the construction or maintenance of the Regional Trail. The agreement with the County Flood Control District 1s simply to allow the City use of the County property along the Flood Control Channel. Any design and construction of the trails would be presented at a public hearing at which time the public could state their views. Ne hope this information answers all your questions. If you need clarification on any of these Issues, please glue us a call at (909) 989-1862. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ ~~~~ Ni111am J. 0' 11 City Engineer NJO:dIw Enclosures ~; ?~%`T T CUCAMONGA COUNTY April 16, 1993 ~`1 W `!/ GEORGE A. KUYKENGAIL ~n~..e..,~ea,r JEROME M. WILSON ATER DISTRICT Mr. Rick Gomez Community Development Director The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Mr. Gomez. $Kn!I y. General A,JI~dyI~ Tr~F9 ?:CF T. E. SHOLLENBERGER 4p,, ~,Ln„~!vpp .. t,. ~ ~.. c,.aa~ ~P Y' ~~ j ,~%! ~ ROBERT NEUFELD R 'V'CHARLES A. WEST ''89 ~ 1 ~ X00 JEFFREY A. CARTER 7~ I 7 ~1 ~ '.F I have received your letter dated April 12, 1993, and I iipologize for any confusion that may have resulted from my letter. However i have discussed on several occasions with your Associate Engineer, Cindy Hackett, what the proposed water rates Cor Fiscal Year 93-94 will be. I will be recommending that the Boazd Increase the water consumption rates as follows: urr n Domestic $.79 ccf Pazks and Rec. $.67 ecf Proposed Proposed 7-1- 1-1-94 $.83 ccf $.87 ccf $.72 ccf $.76 ccf The Domestic rate would increase 5% on .Tuly 1, 1993, and 5% on January 1, 1994, and the Parks and Recreation rate would Increase 7% on July 1, 1993, and 5% on January 1, 1994. We will be attending the Public hearings for the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts. Please let me know where and when the meetings will be held, and we would very much like a copy of the proposed budgets prior to the meetings. ICyou leave any.questioas or concerns regardtng the proposed water rates, or need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Shawna V/halion Manager of Finance cr,: Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director YAJI SAN RIiRNARDIIJO RU.'RANCHO CUCAAIONGA,CA 91"lY~US?8•t'.O.BO%fiJN•(90Y19HJ 7591 .1~4%f4'~'n"II May 28, 1993 Dear Mayor Stout and City Council Members, My name is Roberta Capper and I am a Victoria Windrows resident. I am writing to ask some questions and let you know my opposition regartl ing the proposed tax assessments on landscaping and street lighting (and traffic signals). I think this is a very emotional issue. Maybe you council mem'oers have been more fortunate financially than alot of us and don"t realize what a burden these additional taxes do to people who do have to live on a budget. With the economy the way it is, unemployment at a high, raises put on hold or decrease in pay, I don"t see haw raising taxes could be the solution. The problem is: not only do VOO want to raise taxes, but so does the county, state, and fetlerat government. When does it stop! Vou can only squeeze so much until it is dry! Talk to a realtor or any bank and see how many homes are in forclosure and/or how many people are filing bankrupcy. With the way things are going, ii's only going to get worse! It's really too 6atl because for those of us who live on a budget it wall mean cutting out the extra things like signing up for karate, ballet, or other tun activites. I do have a few questions and would appreciate a response: 1) In Dec. 1992, the "Windrows Neighbors" newsletter had an article regarding the landscaping assessment. fee. Mr. O'Neil and Cindy Hacket gave a breakdown <n how the money was spent for the vi<toria district. I have highlighted some concerns in the way the money has been allocated. a) Regular Payroll - does Victoria have it's own crew that we pay for or is this just a percentage for the time the crew does the Victoria landscaping? b) What are the fringe benefits at f98,890? c) Maintenance antl Operations, Vehicle Maint. and Operations - What is this!? Maybe if I understood (a) this would make sense. d7 Contract Services - do we have outside contra<ts in addition to paying our own regular payroll? e) Assessment Administration & Genera] Overhead - Is this a percentage of overall cast? f) pelinquen cy Contingency - the honest, hardworking person not only has to pay his taxes, but has to make up for those who do not pay. It is unbelievable that it would cost 41.6 m111ion to landscape Victoria. After attending the council meeting regarding the utility Fax Pf1GE 2 assessment, and still having it pass, I don't untlerstantl why you would still impose another tax increase on the people. Vou have explainetl that the city doesn't qet to keep much of the property tax money. Maybe it's time that we fight to keep it! And if the City is in such had fin axial shape, why did the council agree to pay for the cons to ction, operation and upkeep of the trail system with the county, The Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan? (article Wed., May 3). Maybe these things neetl to be put on holtl. Maybe we need to stick with last years budget antl do what that money allows us to and stop at that! In today's paper I read that the firemen will be asking for an increase in their salary. I don't untlerstand! That would mean mare taxes to pay for that. I pulled out my property tax statement and ca lulated that 41.6% of my property tax is assessments! 26.5% of it goes to landscaping. In three years it has increased 10.6% and that doesn"t include this new proposed assessment. I find this pretty frustrating! Vou wrote an article in the "Grapevine" stating haw people don't have easy access to the state antl federal governments and how accessible you are, yet what good does it do to have you accessible if you don't listen to the people you represent? I repect the fact that you have difficult choices to make being a representative on the council, but i would hope that you are sensitive about the choices you make. Thank you. Respectfully yours, Rloberta Copper 12574 Nasturtium Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 899-3206 l'~ qq T ~~~~ H E1-1 C I T i qY ~~ O ~i F p K L 1 iVf ~ 11 O ~ Ul ~ L 1 1`1 O lV ~J L 1 June 15, 1993 Mark H. Ruffalo 6542 Palomar Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Ruffalo: We have received your letter regarding assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and would like to take this oPPVVOrtuntty to clarify the situation regarding Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. Please be aware, that this 1s not a new District. This District was formed in September 1982 for the purpose of maintaining landscape improvements in the Victoria Planned Community The assessment notice you received recommends an increase from ;405.30 to ;422.00 per year. This amounts to a ;16.60 increase far the fiscal year 1992/93 or an increase of ;1.39 per month. It is also important that you understand the Increase 1n assessment far Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is the result to increases 1n water rates by the Cucamonga County Water District fCCWO). CCWD staff is recommending an overall water rate Increase of 9.75'6 for the fiscal year 1993/94. Again, please be aware the assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Ts to maintain the 27.5 acres of parks, 88.12 acres of ground cover, shrubs and turf areas in the parkwAys, median islands and paseos and 3 acres of Community Trolls. The City has taken steps to hold assessments down, however, increases for CCWD are not something the City can control. Please do not hesitate to call us 1f you have further questions regarding assessments in Landscape District No. 2. The contact person is Lucinda Hackett at 989-1862, extension 2340. Cordially, COMMUNITY OEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGIN/E~ER/IN~G'D(/I~V~/IS~IOYNJ/ (~'Y/L//~/~' C'.C~e~ William J. ell City Engineer WJO: dl w cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Mayor Gennisl Stout binym Pro a..m ChnnesJ Buquetil 4~~~ ~~ Jura tom, AICP f_dV Monager ~~~ L.S:;fi r„~,~~ . enter pr, ap P O Sox N01 Rarcho .ucamonga. Counolmember WiniamJ Alexa^~1m Councilmembet niOne Williams Cou~cumember ReK Gueenet ~ApV'ep i0ppr p8PIB51 ~~~~ April <, 1993 Mark H. Ruffab 6542 Palomar Court Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 CITY OF RA ECEIVED NCHp CUCAAtpNGP CITV CLERK JUN 0 91993 CityClerk 171819110'111 121 1121314 5161 city lk Rancho (~tcamonga losao civic Caster Drive Rancho Cotamoopr, Ca 91729 To Whom It May Coecrm: In respooae fo your notice to'coosider the levy and rnlloetioa of m asae.ammt-.for District uo. 2". Please be ootiEed that I am in tool oppositiea to the hex". MY wife and I moved from Ontario 4R year. We paniuaed a "hack repo" home and haw been paying property rases oo a mudt higher asaeaamee of the Game, We haw bbd for a rednoed property trot based oe the rodurod vatx of the home. And Dow (Ixfore we can even pet oar rodrred propety tax ).Rancho Cocamaop waob to make anathc aaraam®t. I know I spelt for many whm I ray, •ENOUGH ALREADY", How do you dvic badas expect va to survive aia year of raxe; eaxe and moro bxea We need a respite from taxe Dot more of th®1 Yoa haw atredy ianeased the utility taxes (eves though the oommmiry apokeoat apliwt it) Yoe want ro ioaeaae'propvty taxe" bm beratae of the Proposition t3 whc6 Deeds a 2/3rd myority vote of the aommvnity, yea cant. Ins[nd you avb there •assessmeb' tocircamvmt our vote and you ask for av opsuoo/7 Wi0 you listen to w7 What about the otaiaar Measure U that we aro about to vote on which if passed will iactoase the idea tax by 125L7 More taxel Oar reemtly ebped Preideot CSatan bu piae for evm mere taxe. We are about W experieote the brpet bx iaveue is ameieo history. We aro on the verge of • eew "payrog hx' oourtasy of the Cliotom to pay for uniwrral health rate The atimate oo that tun aayrvhae from 7 to 12 S411nn. Do yet think these taxe will hdp our eoooamy? Do you thioit our emp~s wtL take a iTiG cat? Do yea think nor bwitteses om witbsbad the amlaupht of octased pyroll true, aurkmao'a comp pr+®ir®s, sad exasssive tapoYHottA If you do thm you truly do not hear what Rana Perot described u "the poet big sodtiop sound", Eie of Donne was refertinp to jobs lort to Mexico bat I am rd'erriap to Ne many plod scions and 6usioas kaviap California io drove. Please do Dot inctese our taxel /c76-ra/-G3 ~~ jl a YoSSU v~a,es /4 ~/ ~~7 Siooeeely, tn, / 3 0 J7 rn-~' ~fi~-~f,~- . Mark H. Ruffib T H E C I T V O F '~ t1 N C K O C U C ~~ M O N G t1 June 15, 1993 Kenneth L. Ur.,:er 5357 Covina Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Unger: Your letter of protest regarding the proposed increase for the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts has been received and fonrarded to City Council for theft constderatlon at the June 16, 1993 public hearing. A copy of a letter written by your neighbor, Richard Cannons who lives on Claremont Lane, and given to City Council on June 2, 1993 and the response to that letter by file City is e~losed for you lnfommtlon. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Lucinda Hackett at 989- 1862, extension 2340, Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION C'~ZGc-~ William J. ~1 City Engineer NJO:dIw Enclosures Mqyor Dennis l Stqut Councilmember William J. Alexantler !'ovor Pro Tem Cnatles J Buquet n ~ f ~ CounalmemberDune Williams Jock Lam. AIC P, Cdy Mbngger V ~ Councilmember Rex Guherre< ~y~~j- ,(},,yJ~ Ii,SfAl ', rorc L=Net Dr~,.e ~ P09av dOr Ran<nO Cucamonga, CP Vt;P9 (Po9)99C~19S1 p!•i nro %B'•:n. T H E C I ~ v O F R n Nc Ho c Uc n M o N c n Jtme 10,1993 ltichazd Carmona 13935 Clazemont Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Deaz Mr. Cazmona ; This is in response to your letter that was received at the City Council meeting on June 2, 1993. The following information is in answer to your questions: 1. Enclosed herewith is a plot map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 that shows the landscape azeaa, Community Trails and windrows that the district maintains. What the map does not show is all the street trees that are also maintained by the diatritt. 2 The 530,000 figure for landscape plant material renovations is an estimate of what it will take ro replace trees and shrubs fn areas prone ro extreme wind damage. 3. The §6,000 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Pazk site is a figure that comes from a quote from the County of San Bernardino. It would be less expensive ro disk the site but this is rot possible because it is located ro a soil erosion control zone and disking creates ro much dust that mind be blown away. The site cannot be left natural because it is a fire hazard. 4. A detailed breakdown of maintenance and operations is a, follows: BackElow testing S1b70.00 Misc. (electric, plumbing) 6560.00 Materials, supplies, tools 6560.00 Chemicals 62,360.00 Demmpoeed Granite 61,670.00 pence reP~' Pam 62,220.00 TOTAL 610,420.00 5. Assessment Administration and Administrative/General Overhead represent the City's attempt ro operate the mainhnatta districts as a business. These charges pay for the overhead attributable ro the district's operation. These costs are calculated as 7.5% of the rotas district revenue plus 65.41 per Mayor Dennis L Srout Councirnember Willlan J. Alesontler /-~' Mavo( ~rP (Em Chona3 J auquef II '~ COUnCiknember Diqne Wrl11gm3 ;qck Lqm, AIC7. Ciry Mongper Counalmember Rex Gufiene[ I~SOOOvrc Center Dnvs PO BO~90) nCntho Cucortronpa.CA GV2C (7RC)9B9•ra51 Fc• parcel. As with any business it is Important ro understand what overhead cosh are. Crverhead casts include such things as staff time ro prepaze the assessment information for the County, processing of bills, computer time, utilities, mailings, publications, attorney fees and various personnel costa not directly billed ro other budge6ed items. 6. dr 7. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 is showing a current tax delinquenty rate of 14.9%. The City moat take into account this delinquency when it is balancing each distriM's budget. If a~ when the back taxes are paid, these funds go into each district fund balance. These funds can only go ro the district for which they were intended and nrunt be spent on anY~B else but the mainaenance of that particular diatrid. in the future, these funds can be used ro keep assessment rates low or the funds can be rebated ro the property owners within the district. We will investigate ro sae if it b passible to show a line item in the Engineer's Report flat shows collected delinquent taxes from prior years. 8. Cucaawnga County Water Dstrict (CCWD) has quoted the City a 5% inaeaae in domestic and a 7% increase agricultural rata effective July 1,1993 and another rate increax of 5% for domesdc and 5% for agricultural rate effective January 1, 1994. This tnfotmatiat was contained in a letter dated April 16, 1993 from Shawna WhaUon, Manage of Finance for CCWD. A coPY of this letter is attached for your review. In preparing the 93/94 fiscal year budget for the district and the General Fund an average increase of 8.5% was used ro calculate the water utilities amount 9. Please see attached letter dated June 14,1993. 10. Street Light Maintenance District No.l is used ro fund the maintenance of street Ughb and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The faoilitiee within the district, bring located on srterbl street, have been determined ro benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and such those cost aaeodated with the maintenance of the haUtlea b aasigrted ro thin City-wide dbtrlct. Street Light Maintenance District No. T b used ro Fund the maintenance of street Ughb located on local street through out the Gty but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area located west of Haven Ave., but there are parts of the district located in the North and South Etiwanda area. A response to the Community Facilities District issue will be sent under separate cover. 11. PubBc safety b a major concern in fhb Gty, and fuming off every other street light would affect the safety of you and every resident in fhb City. 1 12. A respoiroe to this question wiLL be sent under sepuate cover. If you need clarification on any of these issues or have any further questions, please contact me at (909) 989-1862. Cordially, Community Development Deputment Engineering Division Willi ei1GiL%~ Ciry Engmcer Eacloaurea V17N:CH T H E O I T Y O F R ~ NC NO C UC t1 M O NG t1 June 14, 1993 Mr. Richard Carmona 13935 Claremont Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Carmona: This letter serves as a follow-up to our telephone conversation and subsequent meeting regarding the alleged over assessment of your property within Community Facilities District Nos. 88-1 and 88.2. In conducting the research to ascertain the square footage of your home, I realized that the tract map that your lot is a part of, along with two other tract maps were not approved by the City but were approved by the County. I have enclosed a copy of the building permit issued by the County for your lot (APN 226.221.33) that shows a total square footage of 2812 square feet minus the garage. This number is within the range for the Residential Class II rate of Community Facilities District Nos. 88.1 and 88.2. Therefore, the special taxes being assessed against your property is consistent with the building permit. If I can be of additional service, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (909) 989-1851 extension 2567. Respectfully, A_ n d Y. BI ig'r GIS/Special Districts Supervisor IYB:de cc: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguea, Administrative Services Director Mayor & Members of the City Council Moyof Oenna L. STOW CounC:;member Wdlibm J. Ale~crr; Moyor PrO~7em Cnatl¢S J. auqu@I II _11. COUnClimember OiOne WrILOmS dock LOT, AICP. Gty MOnoger J Counc,member Rex Gunerrea 10500 CAC :.Barer Onve v0 Bo~+lOi 9ancno Cacomongp.CA 91719 r9(19)999~IP,51 r h ?T:T'T~ CUCAMONGA COUNTY Aprll 16, 1993 r nl~ y/qM l~ r V , v GEONGE A. KUYKENDALL vnamw. A T E R JEROME M. WILSON D,I ST R I GT ~„ ~,,,,,,,,„,,,~, Mr. Rick Gomez Community Development Director The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Mr. Gomez, r r~OFq RFrp~ T.E. SNOLLENBEROER ROBERT NEUFELD ~ ~f'R~ ~~!•'•~~!CNARLES A.WEST .B9 7~ ,~ 99,9 ~ JEFFREY A. CARTER ~<. ; I have received your letter dated Aprll 12, 1993, and i apologize for any confusion that may have resulted from my letter. However I have discussed on several occasions with your Associate Engineer, C1ndy Hackett, what the proposed water rates for Fiscal Year 93-94 will be. I will be recommending that the Hoazd increase the water consumptlon rates as follows: Current Domestic $.79 ccf Parks and Rec. $.67 ccf Proposed Proposed $.83 ecf $.87 cef $.72 ccf $.76 ccf The Domestic rate would increase 5% on July 1, 1993, and' S% on January 1, 1994, and the Parks and Recreation rate would increase 7D/o on July 1, 1993, and 5% on January 1, 1994. We will be attending the Publlc hearings for the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts. Please let me know where and when the meetings will be held, and we would very much like a copy of the proposed budgets prior to the meetings. If you have any questions or concerns regazdtng the proposed water rates, or need additional lnformatlon, please let me know. Sincerely, ~- \ __. ~` I~~il~~... Shawna Whallon Manager of Finance 1. ~~ ~ .. `- \ ~.~_~ ce: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, Admintstratlvc Servlcca Director yMl SAN BERNARDINO RD. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 917ty06J8 • P.O. BOX fOS • (ylN) 9P7d5yi • FA8 rv"n •~ ~ , WP~s TAKEN oN A FIELD TOUR OF Lrna~7. tN AN ~T(~<: mPT To S~tsT1F y 'fNt; 13, Flo AG'R~S ~~tA? Cos-r ~ ~~~3g9, 5 5 PER ACRE TO 1Y1F11N"rFIIN. AS PART OF 1NA~ AGRE~C-~ = WAS SNowt~ CaRE~NBEI.TS "fNF~t ACHE AC-fUALIy Lil A? ~IZ~ b RN O C ~lT B U. -(F{~ l'lo rv1E0 W VVE{°~S , (4lE ONL~ f~Es~,ONSiQil.i'Ty `THE '>'416 GIT~/ 1-IF'.s iN '(UES~ -~R%k~s ARE -(fl6 1RC E S ~~Hlc~ F1K UJ~AT~En F3Y ~~E N'OrnEOt,~.INCR, ENE T~E~ FICCOLtNTS FOf~' NO Y'~IOF'.C '~{~,f\N b1'~)t Si{iLli~r.'E ~QY U,IAS At_sv St{GWN GRAuCI, l.Ual~t~u/t11~S S o~v1>/ o F EtJ t~ t C Fl ~Erz E wLE ~ Fi ~t_c p , how mltcEl DoEs IT CosT -t o ma~NT+~iN ~R~v~~ ? r wAs ShowN Y{ F~'fllK~ ~~S~E~,flEVlsior, ,<,rrc J t3AR~EN LA~,~D CoVERCO w I tK lUi L~ G- ROW'T(~{ . ZF '(Ells S t TE \S DEVtsrl_OE'ED tT GJ11_l. '6~ F!"~ l.k A S ~' A ~~ ER (L 0 P. T(,v 0 ~, G t"o E' C T~ GtTY `\AccEP'~s 'flke CnRE of ~(!-I+R~" I~CRE~\ G~ ~~orn wkIAT ~ I,UAs SI+ouJN T Am No'C" CONVINCe.C ~1d14T S Am GE~TiNC my 111oNEy~S WORT, T~ ~NCT 1F you RtrM,ov~ '(NE ~` PoRK FAT" ~Ro~1 `(N~ PC,'(I.1,Al, r'1GRES i~t~ CosT (DER F';C~E W1~1, PRobAE~l.y ~r~~RoRCtt A cosy of ~3o,QOO PEA f~crE S~v 1 ~~jh`t' o r ~rk~s6 oc~se`RVR--(~o~NS P~~s~ ' ftNS1.4~Z T~ Fot_~owitiU QUESTIONS, 1, CAN yak P1Eas~ sN-ow m~J NElfr}IP~o~s AND 11~yS~;\,Y oN A (~L..OT VIEW Y\'1~1P OF DuF ~ts~Cfz~C.T Ua~EtzE yat,l PLr~ti TD SpErvp ~ 137,gao.uo IU LA~JDSGrtpE AND TReE rnP,INT~~Nc~ P~NO i~nw you Can\~ ul~ w ~~!-~ '~1ke5~ FI C-uK~S~ 2 , C R~1 y~ It S KO~J LI.S W N~ Tt6 `/~(.l /tRE ~'OING TO SPEND ~ ~~,ooo.ca ~ti ~--PN.PSC,APG PLANT mA~~;YZIfEI.. ~~NOUI\'IIOpI~ A N Q Pc ~ R EAcKD o W tJ 0 ~ \j('J U'~ E5~(I n1 R T~ ~ _ Ex ~~~~ t ~~~ s ~E ~~~~~N ~ ~u~T y~~ P~A~ To 6u~ ? 3 . CAN yo ~ s Flo ~ In.s a co~T SREY~ K.Dov~ N DF "(KE ~ (QOOp.Ga ~T '(AK~S "ib AdA"fti S~Te ` I~1Hy CANT yo(~ I~AU~ IT S I N C~ ~f!-kER~ ARE NO CUR~~1v ~ P~flN S ~o PeUEI.aP iT? S'C P~D~oI'Ns /~ N A~URt~L 5 P~ G-E.6RI~SI~ RR~, ~~ CAti ~©Ll SNOW llS ~ DE'f A1~p $t?cflb Do ~~. N or ~(,`~. ~ lo,(ogp,oo Illq„v-rE1vA~NCE ~-N,~ O('e~P,~-~. ; COST ~ 5. CA1J yflt-~ SN~ow us A P~R~kKow~l o F T1~v' ~~ 2ti~ l~84, oo COS' FDR ~SSCSSttiI~NT /~DM~NIS'(~R'(I,OtJ !'~N1~ G''rN~AL ©UEtZH~-~p? !~~ sky ~1R~ wE N~.~ 1Z~sPoNSi~~~ Fo6L DTIk~ P~ D Pl,~ S DE ~t~ QI~ENT 7"AKE s ? '(NtS `~~'c~ you r~RE SttDW~NG ~4511~0.~~ IN DELItiUQ~,~NT '(RX~S I,v~{lGN IS I~ /o i7~ 'r~tC auo~Er . you s~,,n t~ ~~~ Fi~sr nlt;~~'~NU -r~I:~-~ yo~~ .~o~~E~r D6L~h;t~uElti:~ 'ff~\Y.Gs A~ SO~,tG p01NT', SF so 1_,.){{~E Do wE sEE n ~~N~ t~~:r,~ tN -r~;c ~UflGE~ ~~~PK~~wN ~o~ '~ C~~~~c~ L~~'I oR ~'R~cc,uE~eb'~ D~I,INquENT -t'~X~s ~~om PREVIOIAS ~tiL1~NQI,t,~t\1GlEs 7~ W~ DoNT W-~tJT Tb PA~~ ~U(~ G~tG~Z P~o~Le's SAXES so E~~CN~R C~,t Sn~ IZv I~ s O P~ ((Ca ~. I,E G'C' p yp0~u{(~~ ~'t~ ~n(E S U I~ 11\0 n1~ L~~E ~GN~R~. PI"~QC Gi~~Vr l'1~ ~~,~~~f~ 'f~t-~f WAv~ P~OP(,v U.1tL~ KNOW/ 6C`aRE ~t1E~ t~10VE iti~ '(k~E ~tREpt ~'~IA'~ '(t+Ey l,~ll-L ~t ~XPECT~'D Tb PAy FoR NoT Otvt_ ~(NE~R ,~,~t,~ '(P1lES ~~r 5oME0Nr ELSES I~l.s~• 8, 1f{~ C 1T FtT(R ~p~T~ s l 0 c~ 7~ o F TI+iJ R~-(~ INCRE~E Tb -(N6 RA-('~ SNGREI'cSE 8lb- C C. w D o C C t.,..) ~ iti `f U, Rrv 5 7~T~5 Tk4 RT __ __ ~N~~R iNCR~'RSE ~s ONt/~ Rccv~~NT~a~E ~~ a•`~~ b~ ~~~ Clj' P~SS~SSMEh1T f~1CREPSE, `~• SOryIC dF V.S ~~R6 6E1+~G- OVE(L P~SSess~ ~o~ rnEt-~o- RobS c~D Ss-~ aND CP9 8 8- 2 . "IIk~SE PSSesSrneNrs Pr(~E bFts~b oN ~(~~ SQuRRE Fo OTi~~E a~ aU~ Hor~~s_ I~Ny Do '~N~ C'~T~ Rti CoR~ s Nor Accu~c~~T~~t~ R~~t,ECT 'fN~ acTUft~ SgU~RE Focrt'~c~s o~ o~FZ I-49JrviC5 ? W~R~. NoT QU•1LO~tvG PER~r~~-CS usu,~p By ~~i; . c~-cy ~ T~ flrrv~t.oPE-2 0~ OU(~ I-~Or~l~S ? ~OUI,p NOt ~~E PE~rn~,r IN~p~(Y1Pi'CIAN REQkIRc PL-t1N5 SNvW~NCr- SQUAK>r ~OOTr~G~ OF ~(t~6 f•Om~s~ lo. ~N~~ RRE ~E iti fUo~~t~t ES~w+~~~~ ?~~ ONL ONES R~ iNC{ F~~ CAD 88-a-, D~~,~~~E ? ~~ ~ ~aE r'~ylNG Foy >,o~A~, AND f\R'(•E'~IA~ 5'(REEC LlG-~'~S POND '(Rfl~t'IG Sl~Nn~.s St_0 ~ I h-n,~ SI,D~' 2~ IN A~~FtS 0~ 'fll~ CST >%R(~ OkTS~nr: NOR'(ft 1r'(I~iVVUr1 , 4JH4'.~ Don1Y '(~OSE PEOP~i/ ~~fCRE IN 0~~'~ ~"gS'IS~~, Sl4i~~~ ~~iE ERECt "Co~_I . i~ p•(~'~• I~, ~u~ r,r~~~ "~' --_ 11, 5~`~~o v~ ntio~R E o F 1ik~ euDG6r ~o YZ S 1~D ~ l PrniD S l~D'~ ~ l s Fo 2 ~L~ G'(RIG\Ty . CRN W~ TuRN ©F~ _l2. NRU~ C'~OY~I~S g~N SoLD ~D(t CFD ~~-~? ~ Nor, wHY ? S~ N DT, {,~HER~ 15 OLt~C TRK Y~2oYJL--~ _ ~oR ~(k4~s ~T~m G-oir~G ? Ts iT iN A mON~t~ (~1P~KKET ~~NO oR Sorv~E p'(1}~ ~CGc~uNr y1~L_`DiNG /~ comP~T~Ttu~ 1NT~R~ST' 1ZRTE ? WHAT 15 T Fly ~ N'CE12E S'~ (~ Pt'f E ? ~1 ~ E N W1~.,L '(Ike r3 oND au So~D ? S{iau~~ ~'T USE Do it Now w~t~~E iNT~~sr _ RATS ~R~ DoWN ? w~ 1,1~Sr; ~u~ G~T~ ~ tUE t,t~~ oute ~Rt;~'Nt,~>~ s I ~tKC ~Rm~o~t F4N l~s f1ti.~p ~-~C~-c,t~(zs~, {2t~~ No~J S c~o,.ir ~~FoRA Tlkrm ~tiD ~~~gE ~IGNT NoW _ _ Tlk~ C I C/~ n1'f f ~~'~0 RD T'D }~ A U r/ OU, i2 C R~1U ~~ Lon K Lt\<E ~~ R~~ ~~vi~v r> __. .. IN LDWsraul~ OR FI,oR~D~ DR ~(7(.ls'~iV . IYIp~~~G w~ Cftw SIn~Pt,iF '(N~ AntioulUT 0~ P~flrJ't"S~ IN~'CAI,I. ~Rll7 5(,~S"("gM s~ ~ 0 I~INI~ Vk W l'(~ it] f~'f ER ~t hl G-rz ~~ Ri~D ~-tl~(ZDSCt~Pt~ 5 ~¢ UUE ItJ A IUINf~~J pESER'r G1.1~1~'Ci/. pESIGN /~Cc.oRQIN~-L~ . ~.l,T ~S ~OR~ tUl'(H ~~V` a ~ES~ONJ) C~ulc.Kt. To REPoctTS oG ~RbKEN s~S~I~vKt,ERs aND S~~~NKLERS '({~1~( RtAN t,JttEN t't' is RAINING 0 `K l-t;'(' 1,tS 1-{RVE '(~k>; CRPA~1 l.~Tl~ -. ~ Tbl'~~ '~lkF.rn oFF, _1_.F UJE RRE ~E~ovG CSUEC-~C~{1;~Gap Fo(Z pU~l,lN~ IAEEAS IN C~RriVE~ I~A~Kv~~vls S'1\ QE G~~,O -ra EkE1.P K~° -- '(1t~Yv1 1~%~ ~~~t; , ~~~~ U,s 1~ocJ WC C~l~~ __ KEEP CosTs bowN _. AS PAR ~s RAisiNC~ Assessrna;n,-rs Itio~~ ~~~ - URGE ~~~ Grrt~ CoklvclL Tb Vo"(~ F\GFEINS i I T l,liVTll~ T~ LtTtC~ ST~~AIG-NT~1vS t-tP 1~ 'PRo61,t;7~5i CL~1~~ S uP - Irs AcT ~ No DErin~NS,m~n;S TD US 1111PRaVEJ'-1 ~ ~1 . R E ~o tc m l~~r~o t~- I N ! Ts to ~ct~ o f D O I N G Qus tNeSs , - S U~~~ NomEnwU~s -,-o o~~r~~,l~ ~f0~nps 1N OuK ~1=SpEG'CtUt; Q15YRiCTS - -T>5 I NvEsT~ ~~-~~ y~.u><e $u~ GErs Atio _.....__.7'b__ ~ 1 ~ P UJR \~(tr1.i PRO?LST W t'(~ ._'(lkE G 1T11~ GL~1?~C , ~E~RA AcDRmS _ Pt~toR -c~ THE NExr kf~1Ptn~Cr DPt-~.p (n~lb~~3. '(~\S ~NFDR111AT(AN is ON ~~~~ fksSt;55f~ti;rVT No"(IC~S, T H E C I T V O F Rt1 NC KO C UC ~ MONG t~ June 16. 1993 Anna Liese Scheu ri ch 12424 8l azing Star Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Ms. Scheurich: We have received your letter of protest 1n regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council wilt take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. Please be aware that these are not new distracts. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 was formed in September 1982 for the purpose of maintaining landscape improvements 1n the Yictorta Planned Camnunity. Street Light Maintenance Dtstrtct No. 1 was formed in 1983 to provide maintenance for City wide arterial street lighting and Street Light District No. 3 was formed in 1982 to provide maintenance for street lighting for the local streets with the Victoria Planned Camnunity. The assessment notices you received recommends an annual increase 1n Landscaped Maintenance District No. 2 of 516.70 from f405.30 to 5422.00, in Street Light Maintenance No. 1 of 53.96 from 513.81 to 17.77 and in Street Light Maintenance No. 3 of 517.41 from 529.74 to 47.15 which amount to an overall increase of 538.07 to 53.17 per month. Please know the increase in assessment for Landscape Maintenance Dtstrtct No. 2 is the result to increases in water rates by the Cucamonga County Water Dtstrtct (CCWD). CCND staff is recommending an overall water rate increase of 9.~5% for the fiscal year 1993/94. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989-1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGIN~EER'~'I~N!jG'~DIVISION ~f p~ William J, ij ~i~l~~~I City Engine lJJO: j h Moyor Denrns 1. Stout Councilmember William J. Alexantler Mayor Pro~iem Charles J. Buquef II 1y~ ., ~, CouncAmember Dione Wi0iams Jack Lam, AiC P. Clly Manage) Councamembor Rex Gu'ienez iLSM Cn¢CC^rrr Dnon PO Bo~90] RonC.ho Cucomonno,CA 91]P9 1909; 9NV.1951 [ac, 11434 731L~a~ 3%Y9 StarGt• (LAHriNO Lea ~i+o~ca l Ca 91738 ~i~ Lc~~,rt, _ ~.r~ A~ ~~ ~/iG4r~ryp~tc~ I n i li,% .. v . `~c4.R,~ / RECENEO "~ TY O ~~ E RANCHO CUCAA1pN~p CITY CLERK JUN 141993 171819] 10'1II121111131415161 /YA.G~ : /N/~,G^~+.Cna.~~ /l . l1_ ~iLCe~~~ Aw.~s. V _ _ 5'~cc~ ~~ .ems. ~°~ ~/~ G• ~~`.._.... ~rtis~ _~ ~ ,~~ a ~O„l~t/~ moo,:, y ~;aco~ ~iwcaupr-e .. ~/ .c.,~ovccr0 ~;. fir,,, /9~E / ~~ ~/ E~i+GI ~O LUj(~QC°ry"'f7ry~,~~ - i3.. ~'~A~a~i~F.!"Z/Gr~ QI ._~ .~i~/G!•[P ~,r~.1. _ _I "~~'.Lf'6°.U^ ~'r2.L/L „~'yJ ~<l+.e ,/~. ////~-t ~ Wai~v.{7.~ ~D 5 ~/ . %~.Lc i~-u.eCc~. ~,., ////'~ .~~.0 (~.%vto,L,.a COQ, 4~„ /~'ru U ~o~~ 2~.~ii~:o.~rr~ . A~2r~~~ ~c~.~u-, 0 ,"'_ ~ C.: t ~_ ~/ N~ .^/" /4~ / Gkc« R .~k%bG~iDil (/~~ry,~.tl~/ i9 ~.crf-,o( P~°o~ ~.,~.~ /l1~-~ c~%r~c ~r~ou.r Sv~..,o.H 2~,,~y . 16 June 1993 Mayor Dennis Stout City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Laadaoape Maint~aaaca Diatrict No. e I am writing this letter on behalf of the property owners living in the housing tract called Country Estates in Etiwanda. We are protesting the assessment of our property taxes for the above referenced Landscape Maintenance District. In the Notice to Property Owners the District is described as parkways, median islands, Community Trails, and paeeos. As of this date there are no median islands, Community Trails or paeeos in our area. As this assessment is only sat aside for 108 Single Family units, there must be some mistake as to tha boundaries set. currently, the two adjacent streets to our small tract, Highland and East Ave., do not even have curb and gutter or sidewalks. This assessment is unusually large at $151.45 per parcel for maintaining areas that do not exist. We are alarmed that our taxes could be increased by the City Council this way when obviously we should not be considered a part of whatever area this District does maintain. We understand that our area will need serious improvements in the future, and we will be prepared to pay our fair share only when that happens. Please consider a reevaluation of this Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 in order to fairly tax only the areas that are being maintained. Enclosed is a petition which some of the owners have signed in support of this protest. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Gina L. Nerehaw 13471 Smokestone St. Etiwanda, CA 917]9 ~tiTIT1oN 10 F~P+t`.IAU-y PROTEST FRDPOSkU FfiO(~Riy TAX A~,FS~.dEAI'T FOR LAR1D`~APE ~.IAINT 171ST ~8 - 1/~H141 SPELIFILAU-y I~IAINtAIIJS fv1~DIA~I ISLANDS, GDA,IA,IU~Ii1Y TRAILS k PASEOS - OF W~41U-1 ~"!-t~E kRk f~lorlE IN TI+E f cam, KrtowN l~s'ICouNr>zy RTES' IN ~rlwAr.~D~ . NAME ~~5~~// ~. L~~v~,/tom/n..l ~_ %~ b~s5: 13111 Sl~lq~EtiTONE STREET I~FU St~Sraue ~-t- ~~ y~ ~~ ~. c~~~sa=ia~ ~~~, ~l~s~s ~lue~.s~frx~ P~ . (rG ~/S ~fGSTb~ ~L . /3uS9 ~mv~e s ~nh~ ~ ~ ~F 5 ~ .7 Mo Fc,~-7 ~~ ~~~~ ~~ i3~4/ ~h :tom ~,~ . 13u~ / ~~~k~sfo~~ ~:f. ~3~3s ~1~~~c~ ~; / 3399 moo,<e ~.N.= ~Z-- Q~s$ F55~es~ne pL ~~_.L_ j~-- ~~ ~ ~~ - - ~n~~~ . s _ ---- - --- ~ ~ gg~f ~ s~ ~e ~~~~ ~ /fs~uue /%~ U~ip ._~s~4n~. ~f,~q1~~~. l 3 ~{ Fl3 ~J.blx ~P, ~`3 s~S~3 ~irlMV~,~ dr-. C2 ~ ~k c../ ~`~ ural~f /f~ro~s~~~~aiNSf f~r~ ~ ~(SSe55wIe~L I R;{i ~Rv(G~SU.~rjC l6NpvovtiNehfS _ c~«( ~~ar~ifrH~ of (~isjvc<t ~( t~ilr ~ ~ui~~a as laad rrt fGcy. avc ~~~ clvh `f yleec/- 111bve CrSSrsSWteHt .acic{ {~x<r v~ ufrl~fyr . -- _ ~~naFa,wc~c~D~cu~onrce Th~4tias C,. I~~w~eS_ -- cmaeAK I f q ~ i.. Alois k~C~~2 _ ... _ ._ JUN 071993 y~u/ ~~ ~ ~.f x!)3..9 ~ s v~io~uuzuiziaio~si6i - -~ i Irie Brandt 13971 Claremont Lane Rare ho Cucamonga, CA 91739 f9091 899-8506 June 7, 1993 Ms. Debra Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Ms. Adams: Upon reading the notices which I have received from the City, I feel that I must stzongly oppose this increase in taxes for street lighting and landscape maintenance. We do not have parkways fn front of our propezty; the streets in my neighborhood that do (have parkways) are waf ntained by the residents, the City does not maintain these parkways in dQy way. The weed control and plant maintenance is done by the residents, as well as watering and replacement of any damaged or dead plants. On my street alone there are three (3) street lights, one of which has been defective foz at least six (6) months- I have called the City, they say roll Edison, Edison says call the City, the City says call Hdison, (I know when I'm getting the runaround), then suddenly the defective street light is a builder problem. If indeed I am paying for street lighting, xAen then can't this problem be corrected3 Why am I paying foz street lighting on the west side of town, why are the residents in that ac ea not paying their Eaic share? I do not abiect to paying my taxes, but I ~~ feel I should pay my share plus the amount of other people's delinquent taxes. I don't feel that the people who live in Victoria and on the west side of town should lust get off without payiny, I don't feel that I should pay far developers tax expenses in subdivisions that are r.ot yet built. (are the developers betny let off because they are higgec than the resident, why aze they exempt from these taxes, they recoup this money in the sale of theic houses, the pu[chasecs of the yet to be built houses will pay these expenses whether the builder puts out the money or not). We already pay high sewez and water cha r.ye:; (appzoxlmately $52.00 before I turn on the tap). This does not represent actual water usage. The water district is already getting a 24 lner.ease in cotes. Whece will this end, cutting back on water. usage is not the answer. The base rates far exceed the wat ez usage we're beiny charged. The bottom line is ae are being taxed for non-existent services. We have no landscape maintenance, `re have no lighting maintenance, I should not be taxed for services I an not receiving. Respectfull~y,~/may ~ ~ ~/ ~/q-~ Irie Brandt Rnxc~;~se S~l~p.ur~'cl~. Iy4~~t ~f2a ~>,9 StarGt~ ~2.aHatio ~FF+oti,c4lCa gi73q G,~f (,EZt.~r_, / I b-~0-93 CC . (®rea,,~G ..ITY pp RECEIVED ~O RANCHO CUCAMDNGP CITY CLERH JUN 141993 ;7 A; 9i 10'1i11211~2i 3'4 i516i ~.r /J 2C/rte /Nv .Gcri(/ ~~h ~ /L~'//~~~c p~.B/~Z/tQGc~ ~'~,~ ~ y a ~0 G ~ ~~~~ ~~:~~.~~ ~ti !2.CZ2-u~% u-/taiy~-gam ~ U1 fJ~ A ~r./~%ce ,on, a ~.%~,r.~F ~~P.-ro~.~e ,J ~orc~ ~,,. ?~, /9B6 ~~,~tir.~C`~ `°/ a -rte ~,,, /w~/°''"`~'4'" %-a.L~c . niy ~o,e~r ,~ //iCi I L7.,~~oc~ ~ L$S~J /IiIL 2~-rcveeCr~` .,,,, ,y(/~,~ .'~~y~i~c (~vto.L,:z CGiur-rti,.Cl~„' h ~ /W'ry' /S / "" ~O ~-G~-cc i5 ~iLtvtio~j~' rJcv'e '~O,u-I ~~P~C (F,[/J.e~. ~y~ a~JO,Gro~uze/.rL ~-i i~~.r /~~~ ;,~ ~ .eon ~ %~~i ~ ~ !,~~ ~,„~,~.GL ~~fi ~`.i"~io~r-C N~ Own. r ~h ` cL ~~pc~ CITI~ 9i% ~f~A1G~}'p I.UC,~N~~ `II~~S ~s my lA1Rt~l~1 Pr~ot~s`r of INGRo~S~'S "~D IT1GR~IRS~S IN Sl_~~ ~ SLD~~ P<~9 Lm~~" tel. I. ~EQ~s-r ~~r No ~NGR~~S `rp~K.~ et,~c~ . FuR~rngR~ 1- g~Qu~sr RN ~XPI~A~~JiKwn~_. o~ PAL ~ua.G~rs s}~u~ir~G P~N~ t~~m~z,N~ ~R~RS P1~ySCCP~~~c~, Ce~u~R~~ . DcN9 GoS7" ~(,LSTI'%1GPc'r(,OtJS, U ~ 1-Do~t FoKu/~p i n ~:ss>~.ssm~.~ . ~>C~~S~S INS``~R9 oP 1NGR'~S~S . .DU.~-- - TD out pi>%>%t-cu~T ~Cottiornl,c, TItYI*~S. ~~NC~REI,c~ , ~~~ ~~~- t`Zi G~1'hK9 ~tYl,o NA RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CIERk dUN 1,51993 Ll@ 9 io i~L~aliii,.; a's F