HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/08/18 - Agenda Packet - (2)CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
August 18, 1993
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
rr+
City Councilmembers
Denuis L. Stout, Mayor
William J. Alexander, Councilmember
Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember
Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
•tR
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J, Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989-1851
PAGE
City Council Agenda
August 18, 1993 1
All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 8:g0
p. m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
Office receives all such Items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Coll: &puet_, Alexander_,Stout _.
Williams _, and Gullenez -
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATION
1. Presentation of Proclamations to the Commissioners of the
Environmental MonogamenT, Historic Preservation and Public
Safety Commissions in honor of their service to the City ontl the
Community.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE P tpr rr
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law ,prohibits the City Council M1om
addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be Iimtted to five
minutes per individual.
D. CONSEU7 Ce Punea
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time wilhcut discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councllmember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1, Approval of Minutes, August 4, 1993
2. Approval of Warrants. Register Nos. 7/28/93 (FV 92/93), 7/28/93 1
AND B/4/93 (fV 93/94); and Payroll ending 7/15/93 for the Total
amount of S 1.956,434.49.
3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 9
July 31, 1993.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
August 18, 7993 2
4. Approval to auihor¢e the Advedising of the 'Notice InvRing Bids" 14
for the construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the
Intersection of Mtlliken Avenue ontl Fahmon} Way, to be funded
from TDA Article 8. Account No. 12-4637-9202.
RESOLUTION NO.93-157 15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
'CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILUKEN AVENUE
AND FAIRMONT WAY". IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
5, Approval Of the Environmental Initial Study Ports I and II, for the 19
proposed right tum lone of Archiboltl Avenue ontl Bose Line Rood
and issuance of tl Categorical Exemption therefore.
RESOLUTION N0.93158 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE
OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENT FCR ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT BASE
LINE ROAD
6. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts 1 and II for the 34
proposed Highland Avenue Street Improvements locpied at
approximateyr 420 feet west and 1250 feet east of locust Avenue
and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-159 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1V OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
THE ENVIRONMEMAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE
OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE.
APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET WEST AND 1.250 FEET
EAS7 OF LOCUST AVENUE
7, Approval to expend Asset Seizure Funds 'a purchase bicycles 50
ontl equipment (not to exceed S 10.000), hontl held alcohol breath
test devices (not to exceed 53.000), and computers and
peripheral equipment (not to exceetl S 14,500), to be funded from
Account NO. 7627b511.
PAGE
~ (~`~(~ City Couneil Agenda
L-+,(: +-J August 18, 1993 3
8. Approval to appropriate 5150.000 from fund 12 TDA Article B 54
(Account No. 12-4637-9202) forthe Construction and Administration
of the traffic Signals and Safety Lighting of the intersection of
Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Way.
9. Approval to appropriate 5850,000 from Fund 32 -'Local Measure I" 55
(Account No. 32-4637-9031) and S 170,000 from Fund 35 - 'SB 140' ,
(Account No. 35-4637-9031) for the construction and odministrotion
of the 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst SireeT
Improvement Protect.
10. Approval to appropriate 59,000 from Fund G9 -Gas Taz for the 56
Construction antl Administration of the Alia Loma Storm Drain
Replacement of the North Terminus of Hermosa Avenue.
11. Approval to order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance 57
District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distrct Nos. 1 and 7
for Trod Nos. 13565 and Tract No. 135655 through -9, located on
the north side of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road.
submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO.93-160 56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 13565 AND TRACT NOS. 13565
5 THROUGH -9
12. Approval to Release the Real Property Improvement Contract 87
and lien Agreement between the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga
and Delores Browne. Successor Trustee of the Edith E. Browne
Trust, upon the letter's compliance of the payment stipulated in
the aforesaid contract.
RESOLUTION NU. 93161 69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND
LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DECOKES BROWNE,
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE EDITH E. BROW'NE
rausT
13. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and 70
Lien Agreement with Vlncenf Martinez for public street
improvements at 8762 Vinmar Street.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
August 18, 1993 q
t4. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 93-057) between the City 71
of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga
Community Foundation.
15. Approval to execute agreement (CO 93-058) with San Bernardino 78
County Foodbdnk to continua to serve ds a distribution site for
U.S.D.A. Food CommodRies.
16. Approval to execute Terra Vista Town Center Lease (CO 93-059> 89
for City CommunAy Space wRh Western Land Properties
17. Approval to execute Amendment i3 (CO 92-064) with Volley 93
Bosebail Club, Incorporated and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wBh respect to prefened parking paces.
18. Approval to execute Ir,iprovement Agreement Extension for 96
Tracf 13281, located on the northwest comer of Bose Line Road
and Rochester Avenue, submitted by M.J. Brock & Sons,
Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO.93-162 9$
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281
19, Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 99
Tract 13303, located on the southeast corner of Mountain View
Drive and Tena vista Parkway. submitted by Lewis Homes.
RESOLUTION NO.93-163 101
A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA. APFM2OVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13303
p. Approval to execute !mprovement Agreement Extension for 102
Traci 13857 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue
and Vinioge Drive, submMed by M.J. Brock & Sons. Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO.93-164 104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13857
PAQE
I
~G~
City Council Agenda
-
August 18, 1993 6
E. GONCFNT nwnlunurcc
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the lime
of first reading, Second readings are expected to be routine
and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the
Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will
read the title. Any Item can be removed for discussion.
No I}ems Submitted.
F._ ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN ~
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as
publle hearings as required by law. Tha Chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION TO EcTABUCH AN IND R RO IND ml IN DlRnlr•r 105
NO. 4. ALON BACF I INF ROAD FROM. A .RIBA D AV NIIF`O
H RMOcA AV N I U4L ~(~ R I 2LIA F INDC AND DFTFRMIIVATION
OF RESPONaIBI ITV FOR ON~2R~ON OSrs W I I AN PRIVA
RESOLUTION NO. 93-165 109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FORMING
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISFRICT NO. 4, ALONG BASE
LINE ROAD FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA
AVENLIE
2. r'ONCIDERATION OF FOOTHI BOUt YARD cP IFI P nh 117
PMENDA^ENi 93 ~1 - c vv . A request to amend the Specific Plan
by adding 'Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing
'
Clinics
d5 O conditional use in the Specialty Commercial District
and odding 'Pharmacies, with or without specialty recoil, under
10,000 square feet', as a permitted use in the Community
Commercial Disiric} wtthin Subareas I, 2, and 3.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
August 18, 1993 S
RESOLIJiION NO. 93-166 132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
93-01, ADDING 'HEALTH AND ATHLETIC GYMS AND
WEIGHT REDUCING CLINICS' AS A CONDITIONAL USE
IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN
SUBAREAS 1.2. AND 3, AND ADDING 'PHARMACIES,
WITH OR WITHOUT SPECIALTY RETAIL, UNDER 10.000
SQUARE FEET", AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN
SUBAREAS 1, 2. AND 3 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
public testimony.
No Items Submmed.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following Items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public input.
No Items Submttted,
I COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although
the Chair may open the meeting for public Input.
L CONSIDERATION OF ANTI-GRAFFITI TASK FORCE 14G
RECOMMENDATION
2. CONSIDERATION OF MEMORIAL PLAQUE IN NONOR OF PARK AND 213
RECREATION COMMISSIONER SAM PUNTER
3. CONSIDERATION TO DESIGNATE A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND 222
AN A TFRNAT fOR TH A -. 1E OF A IFORNIA IQ ~ ANN I
MF T
PAGE
City Council Agenda
August 18, 1993 7
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they
wish to discuss at the nett meeting. These Items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only IdentiNed for the next
meeting.
~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously Included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
tar a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be Ilmited to five
minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
August 12, 1993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
August 4, 1993
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
A~ CALL TO ORDER
A regular mce4ing of the Rancho Cucamonga Ctly Council was heM on Wednesday, August 4, 1993, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10$00 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called m order at 7:12 p.m. by Maym Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmcmbers: William 1. Alexander, Charles J. etrquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and
Mayor Dennis L. 5loal.
Also present were: lack Lam, City Manager, James Markman, City Atmrney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager, Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager, Rick Oomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City
Planner, Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; toe O'Neil, City Engineer, Bob Dominguez. Administrative Services
Directoq Susan Stark, Finance 0f6cer, lim Fmst, City Treasurer, Suranne Om, Community Services Manager;
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst tl; Duane Baker, Assistant to dre City Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management
Analyst Ii: Chief Dennis Michael and Deputy Chief Fire Marshal Lloyd Almond, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protocdon Disuict; Capt. Bruce Zcirrer, Rancho Cucamonga Pollee Deparuncnl; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
r~~r~!
B I. Presentation of Certificate of Achievement for Excel levee in Financial Reporting by the City.
Mayor Stout presenmd the City's Certifeam of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to Susan Stark
along with a personalized award for her prepamtiou of dre Excellence in Financial Reposing.
•~.+r•
C. COMMIINICATIONS FROM TNF. PIIBLIC
No communication was made (mm the public.
r.rre•
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
DI. Approval o(Minutes: July 21, 1993 (Buquet absent)
D2, Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/14N3 and 7(11N3 (FY 92N3), and 7!14N3 arrd 721N3 (FY
93N4); and Payroll ending 7/IN3 for the toml amount of 52,140.202.98.
City Council Minutes
Angus[ 4, 1993
Page 2
U3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Ealing Place Cor Sycamore Inn, Sycamore Inn,
Irtcorpomted, 8318 Foothill Boulevard.
D4. Approval to amend the 1993/96 Fiscal Year Budget to albw for on-going Final Year 1992193 Community
Development Black Cram (CDBG) ProjecLS.
D5. Approval of Security Guideiirres for Use of City Community Centers -amending Community Services
Department Policy and Procedure Number 11I-02.00, Geateral Facilities Reservarien and Fee Policy.
D6. Approval to appropriate 5120,000.00 from FurM 09 - "Gas Tax' (Account No. 09-4637-9002) for the
conswction and administration of the Asphalt Overlay on Lucas Ranch Road, from Fourth Street m 5th Street;
Sanm Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Sneer; and Helms Avenue, Irom 9th Street b Artow Route.
D7. Approval to awmd and aulltorvation for execution of contract (CO 93-052) for 19th Street Recouswction,
from Carnelian Street to AmeNyst Street for the amount of $850,713.48 (5773,375.89 plus 10%, contingency) b be
funded from Arterial Measure I Account No. 32-4637-9031 m Kruu and KnvC Conswefion and Engirrcering,
Irtcuporatal,
D8. Approval to awanl and authorirs0on for executlan of contract (CO 93-053) for Asphalt Overlay on HcMs
Avenue, between Ninth Street and Arrow Highway; Lucas Ranch Road, Fourth Sweet w Fitch Sueu; and Santa
Anita, Fourth Street m End of Road, in the amount of 5101,436.28 (592,214.80 plus 10% contingency), b
Manhole Adjusting Contractors of Monterey Park, m be Ponded from Gat Tax Account No. 09-0637.9002.
D9. Approval m Release Certificate of Deposit accepted for completion of Urtdergrounding Utilitles fw Tract
11734, located on dx: iroMwest corrrer o(Vineyard Avenue and Artow Highway.
DIO. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Cath Surety. Acceptance of Bonds, and File Notice of
Completion for Tract 13359, located on the cast side of Sapphire S1reeL between Orchard and Jennet Streets.
Release: FaiNful Performance Cash Surety (Street) 583,100.00
Accept Labor and Materials Byrd (Sweet) 83,100.110
MaintrrtartocGuarantee Bond (gucet) 16,fi20.00
RESOLUTION N0.93-156
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIdE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13359 AND AUTHORIZING THE FB-ING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, soconderJ by Buquel to approve the stet( recommendations in the staff reptnts
contained in the Consent Calendar, with Buquet abstaining from the July 21, 1993 minutes. Mowon carried
unanimously, 5-0.
t~~r~•
No items were submitted.
rrr...
City Council Minutes
August 4, 1993
Page 3
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
F. ADVF.RTISF.D PUBLIC HEARINGS
•+r+rr
G. PURLIC HEARINCC
rrrr rr
~ CITV MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
Hl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE SPORTS FIELD MASTER PLAN Staff mport presented by
Suzanne Om, Community Services Manager.
Councilmember Buquet stated this has also been reviewed by the Park ami Recreation Subcommittee.
Mayor Stout inquired if Ne Sports Advisory Committee has approved This.
Suzanne Ott, Community Services Manager, stated yes.
Mayor Stow commended sett on their work and how much better die system works now than it use m. He also
Nanked the Park and Recreation Commission and the Spsuts Advisory Con,miuce Cor (heir work on this matter.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve the Sports Field Master Plan. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-D.
+rrrr•
H2. @EPORT ON MILLIKEN M TRO -INK SI . eCH D n.. Staff report pmsented by Ice O'Neil, Ciry
Engineer.
lack Lam, City Manager, added that the schedule was able to be moved up because the property owners are
cooperating wiN the City on the dedication of property.
ACI70N: Received and filed the report.
rrrr+•
II3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE Sp IA EV NT A rR NT ( O 9 -0541 WITH VA Y
BASEBALL CLI18. INCORPORATED Staff report presented by Linda Daniels, RDA Manager, who retorted m a
new page 7 which lud been disvibuvd to be part of (he agreement
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander m approve CO 93-054 with Valley Baseball Club, Inc., as
amendrd. Motion carried unanimously. 5-D.
.rrrr•
City Council Minutes
August b, 1993
Page S
«.~~~~
No items wem identlfied for the next meeting.
r~~~~•
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications wcro mods fmm the publk.
•~~~..
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams m recess m an Execufive Session to discuss personnel
matters and property negotiations at dte stadium. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The Council recessed at 7:44
p. m. and reconverred at 9:35 p.m., announcing they unanimously approved s one year extension of the City
Manager's contract The meeting adpumed at 9:36 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra 1. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
Y
N~
• ~
OOaO
'a a, M1ONmN ~bmN as
V~'OmT~ OM1OOONOm00
~~ Nan .y yN yN and N n~nrvnyy
y NNm .~ ^NO
m N ~ y ^ W V
j ~ ~
~2~
Onrvy rvwwnnhi-I~nynn M1f~nnw +^J Nnl
. ' !! nnl~nM1f~~n hl~y M1Fl~w1~h aPaq
~.a ~ ~ • ti~N M1M1 M1
i i ..°v o ~ • e .. e e ~. . a
" ou ° wa
.~ w r r'~
y .°.~ ~ a
j . a a ,o i^ '~ w
Upr w n..
~ a i z ~ ~ r
j i N¢ ¢~ ~H J N
~2~ ~~ S S e~ M1 J N ~ r
~ I n i E y J S j •u Q 'J •l
~ w 1 '~ I vi M1 a ~ u
~ \ RJm ~\uVKa ~ ^~3 ~~~ w ~. N
t iJ ~CZ ~ ~= Oi JiOf3 '2
•; n ~ y iii V v t~ V v
'J; = 2h~ LhTw jO.z p7 j7 m Kty
,J,1 ~-u y ~ r~ 2H u N
2 ON IFm~tSV>LF431~ 1~m Sy'O JLStu NO~?u~]o
iei ~ircYaeon3¢H~'« Ern~'u ni .%
v
n _
.~:`
it ~ o ~~
_i i ~
i ~~ 'ja"i j 34 °n"a a
w LVL.~ O~ JSN Yr•-i
nxK u~" nKy = .~~~~ "u z ~.2 na
~ Q~n" a "~°°. .Jia~ ~,;~ a is
~z .~•yw °ir "j=aY~~'~y is .ems moo°f ~~i a.`i.iN
~ ~ ~E<2sYR~IV 60u ~n 0~6fSK )„TO E.nJ w,90p u _¢ ~ >'
~ N _ 4n U
±E~ JJyt L220 YGy ylOw ~LVUE'V, ' v~ yWUFiyLL< 2U
>NLL M1~<
Y ~(
1 yj~ y Pw~ Ny n10NNmMn G¢Kh OF N~•1N Nin .n N/i ~nFF m.7>]31Y1,1 Jj V'a
~ ~ "~N nNnl Jm m^NOmn ~ ^I ~4M1 Owlny
•~~ y e~NT~ ,T N T
mQ m J~Tr1SwpNTTFNNn
m ~~
2
YI
:i:
\•
d
\n
O•
•YJ•
020
~a
•S•
n2~
p~J l:
•zn
Z•
qt
61
v•
>•
aao
om~ 'oao
oJP PTn
N rvA~
-pan ^
++NO OCO
PPP PPT PTP TPP
al • t 1 • > ; It
i +L or
.~ i \ o
i
P \ L ~[
P r r N h i J Y:u i N s
0 1 t o M1 fi b nl
uJ UN In b
P~ a
vJJ • • aOlc >P
_ •J i•
U Jv
N 2 J'1 O d
JJ V'J J
d Nj~e' wfh JJ J
1 ~- S • J J L V V 1
.~ JJp• _ JJJJ
2oN20 LLZ VJ/: uu 21
,J ai_ i,T.a u2
T2J2\nY \tidui .~! ~Sy 22L1Z ei
rv nLLOV.y N~rw V7w~ •JJ
i V~SY h2~ naVJ N
~: 2 h2a ~ _ z£M22 NSq
PIw ~ ~ZY \VU 2 JJNh WJ
J ~S~SJtz .4pa ~ziLi VJ
J i>n i,U iYJia wrJafY\\ nL> •LLLJ'JSr
N J u
- N aOn uuN hJ2Jn ZJ>
wV7aUNR L:-1 rcdN JU S:+~+UL
h r-o~~ NT ~Ie-: Nu i-2i
~ .IZrrL `~ » ~x ~.NS ~o~~xz.. ~ ~n
T t ~ uHy ~.2.>oY°Y '.S,y „rc" boa>'Y i
o J i' »>>Y>~ti>J N o-1 Nmrd++m>m~. N.. LLLF>~ d Nei
i y
O ZVY
rr l _ 22 2 _
N
aOVVV J O
nIJLNZ2
J /122 N P
J V J ~OJ w N V'J U y
D :+ W
N h 2 N'Y (] T. J V V d
J W2uZWnNLL 20 ~.
J V2m JM adW Vh !
~1 1-d 622 VO •~V Wf N20 U mg1Y •V
O 2 2KOJdJJ2JN ZdW 02 <MV
a J a YWh NJ2
iY <UZ !iU wVZLm nIYdNZ wNwppZ~O Lv
J6 VJ 7~'^V L2Jm>lJ2 mho
J J< <>N Jhz •SW20~[hg2N6 dm2h\<fNVOlm 61n O<J
2 J J• LNhhn'1N U_m VN_Oh<Lti> 9V¢1 IIZMh
O w\<WmW •W<m •N WV6LNJLd<JN WY 4ZYW ~fVMQ •LLJ J•Oi
t •SC h2hONLNMM2 Zm OJ l~Nd .JMOh •2 2 Y100< •Y
i Y„2f OM OVW LLOWSNIVLLjdKO {•JVmRONMNLM d VO'Z
VS<VLOmOJJWNKM2Y hUdhdWd h22UROW OWZ
N J mhNGJ<Vh<JhJ2z<J>RR<WWNhhfOLN2<2WdJNGY2 WM ily
i VJJOKmJZ 1tWWWJOR> iNMJOONO• MONUIJOW •'J!W
I- J r+ «!!f«<f<Ommm90mLOVVUUJUVUJVVV0000 LLIL LLIL 4C OmLi
h PNN O.I'Ih NH h/~hNNhNNNhPNm Nlrl<PPmNtiMNgpy0Y0• hNfy
m P1NNN N~pN•N~ONO~PNNPPOrah h.ihNP•1NOhhPhNIN •1~fN
N ~PP~IOmOm MV r ynlNhN ChON wON•
P N n1 PI wn1TNM1N~TT Nh N~4MN '1 n1 Ir1 I~ImTNN Ary111 NN NtiT
M
3
W:
u•
°c~
• ~
m~S
\~<
\•
m~f
o:>
•Z
W1
h:
o•
zi
rci
ii
•l
a
m
v
u
O m
4NP
1
usi
=~0
V
t00
¢r¢
ON
Jw
V W
•L
•z
•¢
•o
~O
•F
•W
1 1 1 1 1
NammWOryP«mgnf-nPNamm amN<mNe N~pNOPp
O N F • 00 mawmhmnmaOhONPmNPNmF TPFWCNIrONNFw
O N a hP rNmPmaNaNONOOmNNOOm mIONAmOmOryFO
0 w ma m• fFNnNFrnPrN 'ONFm naN
a V •< O m w J a N m h P m 'O
O n r n w r P r«
n
n n n n
n n n
ianwnananw was ian
m<.oFNmFinaNaePe.nNnaNaFmPO.~NmaNOnmPe..NmaNaFmPe~N
nnnadaJnm gin ii°nNNN~°n~M~'Mw wl"nNMwa.NrMV.r.N.NrnMM:.M~Nw.mnrN~Nx
PPPPPPPPPPwPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
OFFFFFFFFFFFFFnhFFhFnwnFFhFFFFFFFFFFhFFFFFFFFFrFrFFF
U
t 1 11!1!1 I 1!! ! !m! ! ! I! f !
i .. • N m a w o ~ i H n
iPm NmeP m PPPP W UJ LP V O
i\F FVh F F F h„NF G UZj i F
r M \ \\ 6 YV fJTZ mN IL
ov vwuav vl ~FS~ ON caw v iW
V VWVWV N¢ YS ¢LOh WV J
WV VUVZV V V VwwV OOrM FV f
O \6 qL rVOL W ZV a h
1 i 00 O !O p« ! ZM L
\ m L \\ NJi •Z ZJ N LL 2 3F
~' ~ s_s_ rc¢«WN m ic¢
m O N N y a{p2rp Z Of .W¢ J uW: ¢ W
Y N 6 ° O VV /i ZW6N=Z JLLi¢Y 2uS¢ 2K Sf rN i
\ J <f 002L• G SVJ fCf2 VNfO NW
C F V F N4«O J<Nprp S~Yp N JV O
Z W[i«FJrw~JN¢[W WJWZ WLVW6 NNN
O LL V S FFMO FL<2«N'JNJN r rf rp0««« FU>
O Z 22JUpyfPmJ >M< 2NZU 2Mf3>J U
F J ° WW Np p1J •U6WZiLP «Z« hZOY LL
W 6 N V O „ LL1L f4LLYLL LLr i MWW tOfO fW fOLL ZLL <
W O ~ ww iL7M J «20~W ZrNLJZw rL¢Wi2'J N6LLN p
O N 00 NZNWZYON4 WiNy J 4 6Z fNNZOr Wr
r J OwZO Zwh V~jf W rm 1FN
y N O Y U JJW¢NLN¢JWWVWtp VJW 'J JFZJ~w
p W ~ 64 UyUFJO¢N<VrfJN U YN yUN WUNw2¢¢
2 V > m «VLLNW<V«2JLLOdWMP«m N06M2M'J JJFym
p C P C ZLLLwp¢F> MLO ONS 20 hi~~JJ ZNLLry~WODf
W s ° WW WLLJ3WSWNLL W ~W<wOWO MWJ~W LLOS
> F J r a r >Y°WNOM6m°26Uf6P>T>V ><LL>0°Jf 6UUN
r
V
P
r
i u u
N z : a
N ZV
V 6
2 MW W
N p « r[_ yV_U_
V i « N
J r OOZT w
NUR zU<w 2
~ J N [O24 O JWN•
¢N CWMS •U Y.LL N
i o ° Fi rz uu°i. i¢°SZ°pa ~
F r rM WwG VTON««ZhVUf J°
2 ¢ Z [> QY6 NNSJi NJM r G•
«J NF«w <OfN02 4
N i y i o ii`o r>N zc>z ~VLW z° pu
r 2 2 Z« LL 2z 4[ p0 <SNM NZ
WWW «JVWMUVi WFN
r J iNV N0.VJr <M¢wNV«
p Z<¢ VVr°°JY6
r < O V Wr «WILU OONhhWr4M Or<»
« w ¢N O¢wMt s4N6YNOrZZ
«OSrZrOWN<WiW [2rr
i Y[ P O fi Wr OWtf<SN0.2VSJN W
f 2 ROV«OMN O4<1 NQ2<
[ F N W it f¢V~ hl JWWUry wlt0 \
V N VW JYVJ6WNrNh ¢J¢SMrhJO
z O r O OJ[N9« J f<W;M«p0
V « [ G z ') N «V 1<f « « IppOUYVVVVVUV
N wV rye mFaO r~pmhFFmrOmm<
r aP q• r ammJmnanamurh Fr°-w
h m rr ao ew< h ao
P m m rNN nr n Nr
Y
LL ¢ L
r
N ~ J
u
oWLL r N
um
OM h 2 Z
r¢f < WSW OU
ZNL W 06Fr¢
r iprf«N
OwJ rOWaW
V¢• ZLLWJ W7
«b «OMN NUZO
ZNG FVIJiOi •rNM
Rw<mu¢i lhili wuielz.~
•MhUrih2tM162
SJrWNNUWSJJ•
~fww««f mef«of
VOOOOgWWWLLLLILLL
NnpFPOnwarnhN
nP„mmNnomnaf
Om rINIFOrPO
w NN mM
6
..
g"- 9_.~' B.- _ ~ '' ~ f E
~ ['
_ _ _ y~~eY
..
~ }__iP
I S. B:C
g~s
'
8 CAB.
1 ..' 9
E
y °A- _. ~y
_
:Ai
a
~ wg _ s6:=Y
. 4
~ ~ o~~~
rt ~
, ~
,. . ~
E
F j~
B_
- 16:
si ~'~~ F
zsy ~
,igC
'y ~'. 3 :. A ~.
4.. ~' % ~ \ 1
_.
.. 9
x
~ %
HI
9
__,- cr.c z._.ssac~sca~~aSa`~ _ __ _ =r`a € s
. ~ `~
~.~ -- e'E6
- ~E Bfp
P
~'~ .... ~.°.F~.~°nRi9'~5. `¢, ~} RR. ~.°b'!: S
M SC .^.n'd S
m
°8~.^~~>>~. ~R RRRrv8AF8Ra°8RR
....... .. .. .... ..
.. .. . AA EEE~°-~
mm:m T_.
P
v8.=,2 P.
S RSRBgS es v
sZ~ss'a~'ce%Y S`$a2F~8ReFS8 ~ YIE .° 8^°.L. _
Y. ~ °OSRSeR s
£~£. AR€°e $°°°£.°+e&
5e° L'.l°n F. 9
$
c
k :>£zH,%3845 ~%R£€aae~?,°~Sc .°' Ac-pB F g
°
_. ...
YY. .°.R.`. <.R.,bRSPoa3 FYY.^.Rc$`-'% :: r`. ~ '^.
i °.: c
i~::YYYY'iYYYVYy'Y YL'~'Y Y'YW Y
::'• Y'~+ Y RpP:~ .K
:
y ` Y ~~
.
y ~ Y
~ ~ ~~ >
~0
RESOLUTION N0. ~- ~J`' 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
"CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT
WAY'', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE RIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for Lhe construction of certain improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, OE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the
plans and specifications for the "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AYENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY."
DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed fa advertise a5 required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or
proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and
followingtwords a difiguresa tod~'Ltisement shall be substantially in the
"NOTICE INYITIN6 SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of RarH:ho Cucamonga,
San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIYEN that the Bald City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the
City Clerk 1n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on ar before the
hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 9TH day of SEPTEMBER 1993, sealed Dids or
proposals for the "CONSTRUCTION OF~71C1fFF1C SIGRID•S-AAd'~SAFET4 LIGHTING AT THE
INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AYENUE ANO FAiRMONT NAY" in said City.
Bids will be opened and publtaly read lmnediately 1n the office of the
City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made an a form prodded for the purpose, addressed to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of
the "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION
OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY ".
PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter i, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevatltng
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character 1n the iocality 1n
which the puD11c work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
is required to and has determined such general prevatltng rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of Der diem wages are on file in the
15
office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any
interested party an request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy
of such determinations to be posted at the ,job site.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
twenty-five dollars (f 25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed
for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or
mechanic 7s paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore
stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as
amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the
regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly Indentured
apprentices may be emplcyed 1n the prosecution of the work.
Attention is directed to Lhe provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of
the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or
any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen in any apprentlceable occupation to apply to the ,joint
apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and
which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to
Journeymen that will be used 1n the perfornmnce of the contract. The ratio of
apprentices to .journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five
except:
A. When unemployment in the area of Coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent 1n the 90 days prior to
the request for certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices to training 1n the area exceeds a ratio
of one to five, or
C. When the trade can show theL 1t is replacing at feast 1/30 of Its
nmmbershlp through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less
than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen.
The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds established for
the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered
apprentices ar Journeymen 1n any apprentlceable trade on such contracts and 1f
other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 to the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and
Is
other requirements mny be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations,
ex-officio the Adainistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or
from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shad constitute a legal day's vrork for all
workmen employed 1n the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any
subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the
State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division
2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of Callfornla
as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic
employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under
him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during
which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of Bald Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman
needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and
subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining
agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposai cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount
equal to at least ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee
that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract if the same 15 awarded
to him, and 7n event of failure to enter into such contract said cash,
cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
if the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next Lowest
bidder, the amount of the iowest bidder's security shall be applied by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second
lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of
the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1008) of the contract
price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent
(1008) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the
payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance
of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of
any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon
work to be done under contract which may be entered Into between him and the
said City oP Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposai form bas
not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shell possess a Cless "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) 1n accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(Callfornla Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules
and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded.
17
The work is to he done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and
specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of Lhe
City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies
of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the Ctty Engineer,
will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of E35.00, said 535.00 is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and
specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment
stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of
E15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract
satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General
Provisions, as set forth 1n the Plans and Specifications regarding the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the
Contractor's request and et the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves Lhe right to reject
any and ail bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Gated Lhis day of 19
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this day of 19
ayor
ATTEST:
y e
ADVERTISE ON
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ^-.
STAFF REPORT -
DATE: August 18, 1993
T0: Aayor and Members of the City Council ~- -
Jack Lam, AIr.P, C1 ty Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I ANO II, FOR
THE PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE
P,9A0 ANO ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE.
RECOMMENDATION
It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution,
accepting and approving the Enviromaental Initial Study, Part I and II, for
the proposed improvement at the east side of Archibald Avenue from 490' south
of 3ase Line Road to Base Line Road and issuance of a Categorical Exemption
therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This report presents an Enviroranental Assessment Initiai Study for the
proposed Improvement for Archibald Avenue, from Base Line Road to 490' south
of Base Line Road.
In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State
Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit constructlan of
the above mentioned Improvements.
Addition of right turn lane is necessary to reduce traffic congestion.
It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project Nill not
rreate a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend
that these Improvements be classified as categorically exempt.
Respe ulty submitted,
i~
~~~
W1111 J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:Iy
W ~
~ q Q
W F.
4 ~ J W
J U
N J T J
J ~ r U
3 2 U
30N 3ntl N3AVN
n p wa N
~_
~~ 0
~~ ~U
3fIN3ntl Ol BIN~tltl
o
a
e -y
q
r o
~ >
s
~ m ~
~ w
2 J I
J - 3
~
IW/i _
~~ O
C
N a
0 S
LL ~
a
3f1N 3np N w'I'13N
0
a
0
a
G~ 0 NIA
JI p~ 30N3ntl oa A3NIn
J N
I
4..L_
c~
G
Y
Z
V_
clir of RANCND alcAiaNSii
ENYIRDNMENTAL TNFORiIAifON FO1M
PART I - INITIAL STUDY
General Inforwation
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho
CucamonyaR 10500 Civic Center Drive, _ Rancho Cucamonga; t;a -HZ73D -
2. Address of project: Archibald Avenue - Base Line Road to 490' south of
Base Line Road ~-' "-`-
3, Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning
this project: City of Rancho Cucam~on~a 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 9I73D;~nLac't-Ffenry Ffura os _ _ _ _ 85~'~--
4, indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this
form pertains: N/A
5, List and descrl6e any other related permits and other public approvals
required for this project, including those required by city, regional,
state and federal agencies: Street closure permit; approval of project
by City Councii,_CSty of Rancho Cucamonga. -v
6, Existing zoning dt strict: Community Commercial
7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
P%ject Description and Effects: See Attached
8. Site Size.
3. Square footage.
10. Number of floors of construction. N/A
11. Amount of off-street parking provided. N/A
12. Attach plans. N/A
13. Proposed scheduling.
14, Associated project. NIA
15, Anticipated incremental development, N/A
16. If residential, Include the number of units, Schedule of unit sties,
range of sate prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A
17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loadfng
facilities. N/A
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading
facilities. N/A
19. [f institutional, indicate the mat or function, estimated employment per
shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to
be derived from the proteC t. N/A
20. If the protect involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning
application, state this and indicate clearly why the.appllcatton is
required. N/A
Are the following items applicable to the protect or its effects? Discuss
below all ite;ns checkeA yes (attach addstlonal sheets as necessaryl.
Yes No
21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X
or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. - -
22, Change in scenic views or vistas from exlsting residential X
areas or public lands or roads. '-' -
23, Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X
protect. -
24. Significant amounts of sol td waste or litter. _ X
25, Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X
26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water qualtty X
or quantity, or alteration of exlsting drainage patterns. - -
27. Substantial change 1n exlsting noise or vibration levels 1n X
the vicinity. - -
28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. _ X
29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as X
toxic substances, flammables or explosives. -
30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, X
fire, water, sewage, etc .1. - -
31. Substantially increase foss it fuel consumption (electricity, X
011, natural gas, etc.1. - -
32. Relationship to a larger protect or series of protects. X
Environ~ental Setting: See attached
33. Describe the proiect site as it exists before the profect> including
information on topography, soil stabltity, plants and animals, and arty
cul wral, historical or scenic aspects. Oescribe any existing structures
on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the
site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
34, Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and
animals anA any culturai, historical or scenic aspects. indicate the
type of land use (residential, cammerciai, etc.), intensity of land use
(one-family, apartrt~ent houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale
of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach
photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be
accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached
exhibits present the data and tnfonnatton required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the hest of ~ knowledge and belief. I
further understand Lhat additional Information mAy be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Plannln9% DlvLtsion. ~ "
Date: $-/b•93 Signawre: A~j~''• ~L,..,~Nd~•
enry ra os
Ti ti e: Associate Engineer, P.E.
ATTACMENT - PART I
Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 27, 33, 34
The project involves additional right turn lane, reconstruction of sidewalks,
curbs and gutters, drive approaches and relocating street lights. The project
covers approximately 490 l,F. of additional lane. The anticipated project
schedule for construction is in Fiscal Year 93/94.
The project site is located 1n community commercial area. Ail street
improvements have existed for several years. The proposed improvements will
not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or aqy
obvious historical, cultural or scenic aspects.
4oise, vtbration, dust and odors will increase at the project sites only
during the pavement removal; and replacements, etc. After completion of the
project, all noise, vtbration, dust and odors created by this project, Mil
cease to exist and return to the pre-project levels.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENYI RONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I, 3ACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civic Center Drive
___________ nc o ucamon a, ~.a _^__
3. Date of Checklist Submitted August 18, 1993 `
4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Right turn lane on Arch_t_baid Avenue at
Baso Line Road.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets).
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Hill the proposal result 1n:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes 1n
geologic substructuresT _ _ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? _ X _
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief featuresT _ _ X
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical featuresT ._ X
e. Aqy increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the s1teT X
f. Changes in deposltlon or erosion of beach
sands, or changes 1n siltation, deposltlon
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay, inlet or 1ake7 _ X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or s1m11ar hazardsT _ X
?age 2
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air. '.1111 the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
_ _ X
b. The creation of ob,{ectionable odors: _ _ X
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change Tn climate
,
either locally or reglonallyl
_ _ x
3. Water. Mill the proposal result in:
a. Chanyes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
_ _ x
b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface
+a ter runoff?
X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of Flood
waters?
_ X
d. Change in the amount of surface water 1n airy
hody of water?
_ _ x
e. Discharge iota surface waters, or in arty
alteration of surface water quality,
Including but not limited to temperature
,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
_ _ R
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of
Flow of ground waters? _ _ X
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
trawals, or through interceptions of an
aquifer Sy cuts ar excavations? _ _ R
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
_ _ X
1. Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as floodin
ti
l
g or
da
waves? _ _ X
4. ?l ant Life. N111 the proposal result 1n:
a. Change to the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (lncludiny trees
g
,
shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic p
antsl7
_~ _ R
Page 3
YES MAYBE NO
b. Reduction of the numbers of aRy unique, rare
or endangered spectes of plants?
c. Introduction of new spectes of plant into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Ni11 the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of spectes, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, 6enthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of arty unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new spectes of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration ar movement of animals?
d. Oeterloration to existing fish or wildlife
habl to t?
6. Na1se. N111 the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. L1 ht and Glare. will the proposal produce
new g or g areT
8. Land Use. N111 the proposal produce new
1~g~or glareT
9. Naturai Resources. Nill the proposal result 1n:
a. Increase 1n the rate of use of aqy natural
resourcesT
10. Risk of Uoset. N111 the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or release of
hazardous substances (lnciudTng, but not
limited to 011, pesticides, chemicets or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset condition?
b. Possible interference with en emergency
response pt an or an emergency evacuation
plan?
X
x
_ _ x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 4
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. W111 the proposal alter the
acT atT; distribution, density, or growth rate
of Lhe human population of an areal _ X
12. Housin Nill the proposal affect existing
pus ng or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X
13. Transportation/Circulation. Mill the proposal
resu t n:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? X _
b. Effects on exlsting parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X _
c. Substantial impact upon exlsting transportation
systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goods? _ X _
e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air
traffic? _ X
f. Increases in traffic hazards to nrotor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X _
14. Public Services. M111 the proposal have an effect
upon, or resu 1n a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas?
a. F1 re protection? X _
b. Poi ice protection? X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Mafntenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. End, Wi11 the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the developmen*.
of new sources of energy?
I5. Utilities. N111 the proposal result in a need
oi~r new systems, or substantial alterations to
the following utilities?
a. Electric power?
b. Natural or packaged gas?
c. Cammmlcattons systems?
d. Water supply?
e. Waste water facilities?
f. Flood control structures?
g. Sol 1d waste facilltiesl
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result tn:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Nill the proposal result to Lhe
o struct on of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result 1n the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
19, Recreation. W111 the proposal result 1n an
mpa~ ct upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
Doge 5
YES MAYBE NO
X
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
Page 6
YES MAYBE NO
20. Cultural Resources.
a. W711 the proposal result 1n the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological s1te9 g
b. Wili the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or ob,{ectl
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Nill the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
X
x
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the protect have the potential to degrade
the quality of the enviromment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wilditfe species,
cause a fish or wlldiife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal con~mmlty, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the mayor periods of
California history or prehlstory4 _ _
h. Does the protect have the potential to achieve
short-tern, to the disadvantage of tong-term,
environmental goals? (A short-Lenn impact on
the environment 1s one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of Lime
Wh11e long-term impacts will endure well
into the future).
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
conslderable4 (A project mAY impact on two
of more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of these
Impacts on the environment is significant.) _ _
d. Does Lhe project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indtrectiy7
X
X
X
X
X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
arra vc escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.)
Page 7
i. Earth
There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and
compaction for the replacement and/or widening sections of asphalt
concrete pavement.
3. Hater
~~Iew curb, gutter and catch basin will facilitate better drainage.
6. Noise
a. Existing noise levels wiil increase due Lo equipment operations during
construction, but could be mitigated by the ingtaltatlon of noise
attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment.
13. Transportation/Circulation
a, b, d ands During iTie construction operations, traffic and parking will
Increase on surrounding street near the protect perimeter. Alterations to
present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation and arq Poss1b111ty
of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during
construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour
signs.
14. Public Services
a, an c. 1s protect will have an interim effect on the present pattern
of clrcuiatlon of vehicles (1.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation
pattern Impacts can be mitigated by prior notlftcatton to the respective
agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date oral duration of said
work .
IV. DETERMINATION
o e comp eted by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this Tnltial evaluation:
X 1 find the proposed protect COULD NOT have a slgnlflcant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a slgnlflcant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the protect. A NEGATIYE DECLARATION HILL BE
PREPARED.
_ I find the proposed protect MAY have a 51gn1f1cant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IbP//ACT REPORT 1s required.
Date b - /o _9~_ lf7• ~,, ~.r(,.
-"~3 gna re
Henry Murakoshi
Assoc late En ineer P.E.
e
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 18, 1993
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Milltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND fI FOR
THE PROPOSED HIGHLAND AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET NEST AND 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AYE,
AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE.
RECOIQEMDATION
accept ng abnd appro~vingethehEnvlrenmental InitialaS~tuQytPartstIcand Ilsfortthe
proposed Highland Avenue Street improvements, located at approximately 420
feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue and issuance of a categorical
exempt{on therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption
pursuant to the California Envirommental Quality Act.
BIIGC6ROUMU/NW.TSIS
This report presents an environmental assessment initial study for the
proposed Highland Avenue street improvements located at approximately 420 feet
west and 1,250 feet east of locust Avenue. In conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been
prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned Improvements.
Said improvements generally entail widening and rcstrtping of the existing
pavement for eastbound right turn Lane and westbound left turn lane purposes
going Into Locust Avenue. It is the Engineering staff's finding that the
environment,oandttherefore recommend thatitheseclmprovements bemciasslfiedtas
categorically exempt.
Respectfully ltted,
~~~~~ v`
Niiltam J. 0' 1
City Engineer
NJO:JS:Ia
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. ~3'/.Jg
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR
THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE,
APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET WEST AND 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST
AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the City Counc7l of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Highland Avenue street
improvements located at approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of
Locust Avenue.
WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and
WHEREAS, an Envirommental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared
pursuant to the California Envlrommental Ouality Act, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, the C1LY Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the
Envirommenta ssessment Initial Study and issuarh:e of a Categorical Exemption
for the proposed Highland Avenue street improvements located at approximately
420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue.
SECTION 2: The CTty Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption
pursuant toto tF~alifornta Environmental Quality Act.
kpGW.AI~ AVE.
'~ (±420 FT. WEST AND ±1250 FT. EAST OF LOCUST AVE)
YICIN{TY MAID
CITY OF RAIICHD CUCAIMINGA
E1IYIRONIENfA1 INFORIMT(gl FORM
PAIIT I - INITIAL STUDY
General Information
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho
Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 41730
2. Address of project: Highland Avenue 3420' west and t1250' east of
Locust Avenue.
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning
this project: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
r~~r,~,,,..,,.~ re o'r'f7a-r pis F-Yi'~rtf7~e 7'IDm1-ava'_'TII~l
4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this
form pertains: N/A
5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals
required for this protect, including those required by city, regional,
state and federal agencies: Street Closure Permit, State Encroachment
Permit: Aooroval of oroiect y y aunt v o ant ucamonoa
6. Existing zoning district: N/A
7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Collector
Roadway (State Hwy 30)
Project Description and Effects: See Attached
8. Site Size.
9. Square footage.
10. Number of floors of construction. N/A
11. Amount of off-street parking provided. N/A
l2. Attach plans. N/A
13. Proposed scheduling.
14. Associated project. N/A
15. Anticipated Incremental development. N/A
16. If residential, Include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A
17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities. N/A
18. 1f industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading
facilities. N/A
19. If institutional, indicate the motor function, estimated employment per
shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to
be derived from the protect. N/A
20. If the protect involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning
application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is
required. N/A
Are the following item: applicable to the protect or its effects? Discuss
below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
Yes No
21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X
or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. '~ -
22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X
areas or public lands or roads. - -
23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X
protect. - -
24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X
25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X _
26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality X
or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. - -
27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in X
the vicinity. - -
28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. _ X
29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as %
toxic substances, flammables or explosives. -
30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, X
fire, water, sewage, etc.l. - -
31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity %
,
oil, natural gas, etc. 1. - -
32. Relationship to a larger protect or series of protects. X
Enviroisental Setting: See attached
33. Describe the protect site as it exists before the protect, including
i nformaLi an on topography, soil stab111 ty, plants and animals, and any
cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe arly existing structures
on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the
site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and
animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the
type of land use (residential, conmerclal, etc.), intensity of Land use
(one-family, apartment Douses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale
of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach
photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be
accepted.
Certi flcati on
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached
exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of ~ ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of a0' knowledge and belief. I
further understand that additional information mqy be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can 6e made by the Planning Division.
Date: ~ ^ 3- ~ 3 Signature: ~M~Q ~Q~.,~~„
ATTACHMEIIT - DART I
Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 25, 27, 33 and 34
The project consist of A.C. pavement widening and restriping for transition,
for east bound right turn lane and west bound left turn lane purposes going
into Locust Avenue. The pavement to be widened is approximately 24,000 square
feet and scheduled for construction within fiscal year 1993/94.
The project is located in a partially developed residential area along
Highland Avenue (State Hwy. 30~, approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet
east of Locust Avenue, the northerly side of the project area is a vacant land
and no residential structure exists. The proposed improvemerRS will not have
substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or arty obvious
historical, cultural, or scenic aspects.
Noise, vibration, dust and odors will increase at the project site only during
construction process, after completion of the project, all noise, vibration,
dust and odors created by this project will cease to exist and return to its
normal occurrences.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
L BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga
2. Address and Phone Number of Propone~ 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 989-
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Hi hland Avenue at Locust Avenue
Improvements (1420' west and tl eas o ocus venue
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
YES IMYBE NO
1. Earth. will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures4 _ _ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the so11t X
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features4 _ _ X
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site? X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay, inlet or laket _ - X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ _ X
Page 2
YES MAYBE ND
2. Air. Mill the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
b. The creation of objectionable odors: X
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
3. Mater. Nill the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? - _ X
b. Changes Tn absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff? - _ X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
watersl _ _ X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of waterl X
e. Discharge Into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground watersl X
g. Change 1n the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interceptions of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
1. Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X
4. Pla nt Life. Mill the proposal result in:
a. Change In the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plarKs)7 T _ X
Page 3
YES MRYBE NO
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? _ _ X
c. Introduction of new species of plant into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? _ _ X
d. Reduction in acreage of aRY agricultural crop? _ _ X
5. Animal Life. Mill the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, ftsh and shell-
fish, benthtc organisms or insectsl? - _ X
b. Reduction of the numbers of aW unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X
c. Introduction of new species of animals tnto
an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? x
d. Deterioration to existing fish ar wildlife
habitat? - _ X
6. Noise. N111 the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
7. Light and Glare. will the proposal produce
new leg or g are? _ _ X
e. land Use. M111 the proposal produce new
TTgFi: or glare? X
9. Natural Resources. Mill the proposal result 1n:
a. Increase 1n the rate of use of any natural
resources? _ X
10. Risk of Upset. 41111 the proposal Involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset condition? x
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? X
Page 4
YES MAYBE HO
11. Po ulation. Mill the proposal alter the
oca on, distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area? _ _ X
12. Housing Mill the proposal affect existing
ouil-sing or create a demand for additional housing) _ _ X
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Mill the
proposal a~ignif can resu s n
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an areal _ _ X
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities) _ _ %
c. An impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing consumptive or non-consumptive
recreational opportunities) _ _ %
13. Trans ortation/Circulation. Nill the proposal
r~ n:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? X
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? - _ X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation
systems? _ _ %
d. Alterations to Dresent patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goads? _ X _
e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air
traffic4 _ _ %
f. Increases to traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyNists or pedestrians? _ X _
14. Pubilc Services. Nill the proposal have an effect
upon, or resuTf in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas4
a. F1 re protection? _ _ X
b. Police protectlon4 _ _ %
c. Schools? X
Page 5
YES MAYBE NO
d. Parks or other recreational facilities) X
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? _ - X
f. Other governmental services? X
15. Energy. Hill the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - - X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
16. Utilities. Hill the proposal result in a need
orfi' new systems, or substantial alterations to
the following utilities?
a. Electric power? X
b. Natural or packaged gas? X
c. Communications systems2 X
d. Mater supply? X
e. Haste water facilities? _ _ X
f. Flood control structures? _ _ X
g. So11d waste facilities) X
17. Human Health. Mill the proposal result 1n:
a. Creation of aRy health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? X
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards) _ _ X
18. Aesthetics. N111 the proposal result to the
o s-b~cfion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? X
19. Recreation. Hill the proposal result 1n an
mpa~~n the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Page 6
YES MAYBE NO
20. Guttural Resources.
a. Wiil the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
._ _ X
b. W111 the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or obtect? _ _ X
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would aff°_ct
unique ethnic cultural values? _ X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
areal X
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the protect have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or w11d11fe popuiation to drop
below self-sustaining Levels, threaten to
eliminate a plate or animal coamuntty, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the orator periods of
Californ la history or prehistory? X
b. Does the protect have the potential to ach!eve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-tern,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time
While tong-term impacts wiil endure well
into the future). X
c. Does the protect have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A protect may Impact on two
of more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of these
impacts on the environment 1s significant.)
T X
d. Does the protect have environmental effects
wh+ch will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X
Page 7
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
arra ve escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.)
See Attached Sheet
IV. DETERMINATION
o e comp a ed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
_ the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION rill be prepared.
I find that although the proposed prodect could have a significant
effect on the environaent, there rill not be a significant effect
Tn this case because the mltigatlon measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required.
X I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19,
_ Class 1C, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Date ~.3 -q3 /~pM.~..Q
--5 gna ure
~^"~ Cw~-Z ~~
~iT~-
ATTACNERi - PART II
Discussion of Environmental Impacts
I. Earth
b. There will be subgrade and aggregate base preparation and
compaction for the widening sections of the asphalt concrete
pavement.
6. Noise
a. Existing noise level will increase due to equipment operation
during construction period only. The presence of the housing
units close to the prot'xt site along the south side of Highland
will not greatly be affected due LO the presence of a 6 ft. block
wall. In any rate 1t can be mitigated by the installation of
noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of the
equipment.
13. Transportation/Circulation
a, d a f
During construction operation, alteration of the present patterns of
vehicular and pedestrian circulation will be needed, and therefore
traffic on surrounding streets near the protect perimeter will
Increase. Any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclist or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the
proper use of roadway warning and detour signs.
APPENDIX E
NOTICE OF EXF]pTION
T0: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 P.O. Box 807
Sacramento, California 95814 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attention: Engineering Division
X Clerk of the Board
County of San Bernardino
385 N. Arrow ea ve., nd Floor
n ernar no,
H1 bland Avenue at Locust Avenue Im rovements
ro ec e
Ni bland Avenue 1420 ft. west and 11250 ft. east of Locust Avenue
ro ec oca on - Dec c
Rancho Cucamon a San Bernardino
ro ec oca on - y ro ec oca on - oun y
Cit of Rancho Cucamon a
ame o u c gency prov ng ro ec
Cit of Rancho Cucamon a Joe Stofa Associate En sneer
ame o erson or gency arry ng ro ec
xemp a us: ec ne
Ministerial (Sec. 15073)
' Declared Emergency (Sec.
Emergency Protect (Sec.
~ Categorical Exemption.
15071 (a))
15071 (b) and (c))
State type and section number.
Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1C
easons w pro ec s exemp
Joe Stofa, Assoc late Engineer 909 989-1862 2372
on~Person rea o e Te'lep one x ens on
If filed by applicant:
i. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the
pro,~ect7 Yes No
Date Received for Filing
SiQnatu -~'i~~~~~~il
e
my nn n ~ irnrrn nr.n ~ vnwrn ~
9
STAFF REPORT ~~'~v , V~
¢ [
4 '.
DATE: AUGUST 18, 1993 Fri U
U:~--
T0: MAYOR ARD NSMBBR3 OF THS CITY COUACIL 1B]7
JACK LAM, CITY NANAGSR A.I.C.P.
FROM: BRUCE ZSINBR, CNISF OP POLICE
SUBJECT: ASSET SEIZURE EYPBNDITURS REQUEST
Funds in the asset seizure account are the result of legal
proceedings against assets of narcotics offenders. There Ss
currently $210,261 in this account,
Health and Safety Code 11489 describes use of these funds and
places only two limits on how they can be spent,
1. They must be used "exclusively to support the law
enf orcemen t...efforts of those agencies".
2. The money "shall not supplant any state or local
funds that would [otherwise] be ^ade available" to the
agency.
The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would like to purchase the
following items utilizing funds from the Asset Seizure Account.
As per Section 11489 of the Health and Safety Code, these items
will be used exclusively to support the law enforcement efforts
of the department.
These expenditures are not supplanting any city funds that would
otherwise be made available.
PURCHASE OP ADDITIONAL BICYCLES AND EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the
expenditure of not more than 510,000 foz the following,
Six (6( fully equipped bieyc lea for use by
the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department
Bicycle Enforcement Team.
Uniforms and equipment to outfit seven (7)
additional bicycle patrol members.
A battery charging station for bicycle
lights.
Funds to provide for ongoing maintenance of
the existing and additional bicycles.
BACKOROOND:
Since Stns inception in May of 1992, The Bicycle
Enforcement Team has had a positive effect in Rancho
Cucamonga. The feedback from citizens of the community
has been overwhelming.
There are areas of the city that are in need of the
services of the bicycle petrol and their specialized
style of Solution Oriented Policing. Shopping Centers,
Apartment Complexes and other arses not readily
accessible to automobiles can benefit from the presence
of this unit.
The Police Department, unfortunately, hea more
volunteers then bicycles. We currently have inquiries
from three (3) regular officers and four (4) reserves
that wish to parilcipete Sn the bicycle patrol.
The requested bicycles come equipped with ell the
necessary items to function ea part of the 8lcycle
Enforcement Teem.
All items of equipment purcheeed for the off Scare will
belong to the 8lcycle Enforcement Team with the
exception of the bicycle riding shorts. Each officer
will be reaponaible for purchasing a compatible holster
to fit hie individual weapon ae well ea a shirt to 6e
worn whsle on petrol.
The purcheee of the battery charging stets on will allow
the batteries to be charged in approximately tour hours
time. It will also increase the aerviee life of the
batteries, thereby increasing the service life of the
lighting systems.
When the original bicycles were purcheeed funds were
not allocated for ongoing maintenance end repairs. The
requested 92,000 will fund these expenses for the
original bieycles and the new additions.
PURCHASE OP HAND HELD ALCOHOL BREATH TEST DEVICES
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council
approve the expenditure oP not more then $3000.00 from thm I.eeet
Seizure Account for the purcheee of four (4) Aleo-Sensor iV hand
held breath teat devices.
BACKOROVND: The Rancho Cueemonge Police Department has en
aggressive progrsm in place to combst the crime of drunk driving.
The department trains officers to identify potential under the
lnf hence drivers.
51
We also participate in monthly Against Drunk Driving (A.D.D.)
teak force operations and operate a monthly Driving Under the
Influence (p.U.I.) check points in the city.
Every contact with a potential violator starts with the officer
making decisions based on objective symptoms of the individual
such as speech, appearance, demeanor etc.. If, after these
initial observations the officer feels 1t Sa warranted he then
sake the driver to perform certain field sobriety testa. These
teats assist the of Picer in making a decision on whether or not
to make an arrest. The testa require aub]ective conclusions on
the pert of the officer es to the degree of SntoxlcaCion and can
sometimes 6e confusing Sf a subject is under the influence oP
drugs or a combination of drugs and alcohol.
The Alco-Sensor IV provides an accurate, simple and economical
method of determining a subject's blood alcohol level.
These devices have proven to be invaluable 1n determining 1f a
suspect !s under the SnPluence of alcohol end the degree of
intoxication. They also assist in determining if the aub]ecta
symptoms might be caused by substances other than alcohol.
COMPUTHR BQUIPMBNT
RHCOMMHNDATZON:
Recommend that the C1 ty Council authorize the purchase of
computer equipment that includes four computers with
term3nale and software along with two laser printers and
peripherals to network She hardware, not to exceed $1.4,500.00.
BACKGROUND
The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department responds to more
cells for aervlee end takes more reports than any other
Sheriff's Station 1n Sen Bernardino County. Even eo, the
trenecriptlon of dictated reports ie still being done by
typewriter. Over the peat several years our clerical staff
has been unable to keep up with the trenecriptlon demands
pieced upon them by the petrol and detective divisions.
This has necessitated curtafling dictation of reports and
requiring officers to handwrite complete criminal or traffic
reports in many lnetancea for extended periods of time.
Having to do this has caused considerable delays !n the
processing of reports to get criminal complaints or to the
lnveetigetlon division to conduct follow-up on crimes.
Several options exist. Tha first option would be to buy e
VAX/Digital eyetem through the County of San Bernardino.
Dependent upon which Digital eyetem we purchased, the price
would range from 917,000 to $30,000.
The County system would include the WPS Plua word proeessinq
capability along with the Csllfornie Lew Ifnforcemeni
Tracking System (CLST9) end Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)
end the Records Menegement System (RMS) through the
Sheriff's Department.
The County Off7ce of Menegement Services (OMS) would provide
automatic beck-ups of the lnformetion entered end would
oversee the entire system. In sdditlon to the unit cost
for the equipment 1n this option, there would also be an
ongoing yearly coat for OMS support of approximately
$13,867.
Option #2 would involve the purchase of a "stand alone" PC
system which would include four (~) PC's, two (2) lever
printers, tape back-up, power source Wck-up and software
for a one time cost of approximately $19,500.00 All of this
equipment Se competlble with VAX/Digital systems if the need
should arise sometime 1n the future.
The equipment would W walntained by the City rather then
the County. CLBTS, CAD end RMS would not W a feature of
this system but could be expanded to include these Stems 1n
the future should the need srise.
In consideration of our current Heads along with the ability
to expand end be competlble with future plena of the County
end City, we suggest that "Option #Z" fs the Wet choice for
the short term as well as long term needs of the Police
Department.
The quality of current computers systems with word
processing capability that include spell cheek end
thesaurus, provide obvious bane! lta to expedient end
proteasional results that ere not eveflmbls with
typewriters.
Re§pect lly~3 bmi a .,
~ i
B!'ucs Ze>~,'P.llYe! oP Police
BZ/bz /~
W
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: August 18, 1993
T0: MAyor and Members of the City Council '
Jack Lam, AICP, CT L1' Manager
FROM: 'Ai~liam J. O'Ne11, City Engineer
BY Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE 5150,000 FROM FUND 12 TDA ARTICLE 8
(ACCOUNT N0. 12-4637-9202) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
ADMINISTRATION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE
INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY
It is recommended that the Ctty Council appropriate f150,U00 from Fund 12 TDA
Article 8 Lo pay for the construction and administration costs pertaining Lo
the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of M111ken Avenue
and Fairmont illy.
The protect 1s scheduled for award at this Council meeting. At this time it
1s necessary to appropriate the funds for construction.
Respectfullysubmitted,
ff ~c~~
Nilllam J. Neil
City Engineer
'dJO:LRDad
i~
~.ii x yr nruVx,nv x;ux;evivi~iV xit~
STAFF REPORT
GATE: August 18, 1993
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE f850,000 FROM FUND 32 - "LOCAL MEASURE
I" (ACCOUNT N0. 32-4637-9031) AND f170,000 FROM FUND 35 - "SB
140" (ACCOUNT N0. 35-4637-9031 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
ADMINISTRATION OF THE 19TH STREET FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO
AMETHYST STREET
It 1s recamnended that the City Council appropriate (850,000 from Fund 32 -
"Local Measure I" and (170,000 from Fund 35 -"SB 140" to pay for the
construction and administration cost pertaining to the 19th Street from
Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street.
This protect was awarded at the August 4 Council meeting. It is anticipated
that construction will begin by September 1, 1993. AL thi: time it 1s
necessary Lo appropriate the funds for construction. It 1s expected that
current year revenues will exceed expenditures for the year thereby making
this protect possible to this fiscal year.
Respectfully bmitted,
Ni111am J. 0 N 1
City Engineer
NJO:MDL:jh
cc: Purchasing
W
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~'~ '
GATE: August 18, 1993
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
. Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Monte Prescher, Public Norks Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE 59.000 FROM FUND 09 - GAS TAX FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE ALTA LOMA STORM
DRAIN REDLACEMENT AT THE NORTH TERMINUS OF HERMOSA AVENUE
RECOMENDATIpI
It is recom~ended that the City Council appropriate 59,000 from Fund 09 -
Gas Tax to pdy for the construction and administration costs pertaining
to the Alta Lama Storm Drain Replacement at the north terminus of Hermosa
Avenue.
8ACK6ROUND/IIMIILTSIS
The protect was awarded at the Council meeting of Juiy 21, 1993. It is
anticipated that construction will begin as soon as funds are approved.
Funds will be required from Gas Tax to supplement Lhe assessment district
funds. Thirty-51x thousand dollars was previously appropriated in July
from Fund 80 - Alta Loma Assessment District 84-2 (Account No. 80.4637-
9220y. The total pro,{ect budget for FY 93/94 is 545,000 (536,000 +
f9,000).
Respectfully submitted,
I
N111fam J. O'NeF1~
City Engineer
NJO:MP:sd
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT `~
DATE: August 18, 1993
T0: M4yar and Members of the City Council '
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: NTiliam J. O'Neil, CTty Engineer
BY Niltie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATIONS TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7
AND STREET LIGHTING tMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT
N0. 13565 AND TRACT NOS. 13565 -5 THROUGH -9, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET AND EAST OF MARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD,
SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
It is recamnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering
the annexations to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. I and 7 for Tract No. 13565 and Tract Nos. 13565-5
through -9.
BACKfiR0UN0/ANALYSIS
Tract No. 13565 and Tract Nos. 13565-5 through -9, located on the north side
of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road, are required to fulfill
certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of
those conditions, the Developer Ts required to have the protect annexed into
the appropriate Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts.
The Consent and Nalver to Annexation forms have been received fray the
Developer and are on file in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the
resolution requiring adoption by the City Council to complete the proposed
annexations.
Respectful submi~tt/ed,/~~
L' 1 ~~~ _ "
'd1111am J 'Nell
City Engineer
NJO:NY:dlw
57
'A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7
i TiPACT /~T6u~
rT~CT
/9365-7
0 i
CITY O~ RANCHO CtICAMONGA
COYNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OR CALIFORNIA r /ds65
4~'E.PALL
/NOEXNJ.6D°
'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
STREET LIGHTING IYIAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO$. 1 ANO 7
LECd~'NQ
~ MrD/SIN
m COMM!!N/T>'EOUfSTEFIN T?A/LS
j C/TY M.l/NfA/NEO AA'EiIS
ST.rCCT 131Z~G
87REL!T' G/GNl Od.4NT/Ty
HioC/CNDA GT !
CrPESTL/.v~ PL. 5
SAN 6AB~P/EL' CT, /
C1TY 0! ltANCMO Ct1CAMONOA
COtNiTY OR iAN ttltNAROg10T~/ g
STATt O~ CALIROANIA
~~
exnieir •~•
As8tSSMENT D1/WRAM
IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
STREET LKiNTINti MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7
GEOENO
V.~A MEO/~IN
tQ CPMMUN/T!'dOUC3Ti~dIiY r~l'A/L8
~ G/TY M.I/N7A/NED AREAS
~ STTCtT TP~G
STREET G/GHT QU•4N7/TY
CLAREMONT GN. 2
ANN~9NDALE LN. ~
~P//XoE'L/NE PL 2 I
CITY OR l1ANCM0 CYCAMONOA
~ CQUNTY O~ tAN ttl1NMOIN T f
~..~~ .,
~. ~ lTATt OR CALIROllN1A
.~~
ex~roi •~.
A88E88MENT DIARiRAM
~ANDSCApE INAMITENANCE D18TRICT NO. 7
C01~NTY OR !AN ~l1NAl101N0
STATt OR CALIROIINIA ~/ -~
STREET LIGHTq~Ki MAklTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 I
ASSESSMENT DI/1NRAM
LAN08CAPE NIAMiTENANCE DI8Ti11CT NO. 7
STREET LIGMTp1(; MAINTENANCE D18TgICT N08. 1 ANO 7
b
CITY OR l1ANCMO CtICAMONOA
COtNrTY OR !AN ~lINAlIpM10
r,~~a~s 5
iTATt OR CALIROlINIA
CUSTOMER'S CCpY Sc~~N]~
~/ ~
~~ _ ~_ s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
S ~`~~ ~
~%~ Post Office Box 807
<-^"J 9320-C Base Line Road
6~ ~ `l~~ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
~~~: r ~.~
(714) 989-1851 -
eC¢INetl From- are
,AOpress
/ (f'
A.C NO OESLPIP90N AMOVHi
:~]~5:.]JW
1 Oi:'IER LICENSES AHO PERMITS
1.1]?33]SV eU1lLING PEPMIiS
I,ASb~6N INiERESi
1.]JS1.5:0 vRIniEG AIAiER1Al ,
'i :]~d55N?t0 PfCPEII,ON FEES
,I J]]li]0u
I P4NNING FEES
i]0ll?l90 fN "
~ c` 1
.I A<
U
bLSbi]W BV ixE494CEN5E5
I ]:b0910 GASrv OVENSMOPi
•JJ)]Ji60 P4nCrv EC1(
1~3yJ.]]E0 PLANCNEGV-
Recmpr NumOer
TOTAL 2~s
/ r(~}~
28469 e,`~•
i
c
68
Iwo+Ewr I~ Ew e..~roE~e~rEw•
RESOLUTION N0. 9~' ~~~/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DECOKES
BRONNE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE EDITH E. BRONNE TRUST
NHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Resolution No. 85-84 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement from Delores Browne, Successor Trustee of the Edith E. Broome Trust
and
NHEREAS, said Real Preperty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on Mdy
3, 1985, as Document No. 85-105338 and
NHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and L1en Agreement 15 no longer
requl red.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract
and L1en Agreement and that the C1ty Clerk shell cause Release of Lten to De
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 18, 1993
TO: Mayor and Members of the City C_oC~jYcil ,(w~L~~
FROM: Councilmembers William Alexander and Diane William~'ae
the Subcommittee to the Rancho Cucamonga Community
Foundation
BY: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AOABBMSAT BBTIfBEN THS CITY OP RANCHO
CDCANONOA AHD THB RANCHO COCANONOA CONNUNITY FOONDATZON
Attached is an agreement which Was prepared by the City Attorneys
office at the request of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation
and the City Council Subcommittee. The agreement was modeled after
the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce.
The agreement accounts for the use of staff time by the Foundation
in exchange for services rendered by the Foundation to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. The intent of the agreement is to more clearly
and formally define the relationship between the Foundation and the
city.
The Foundation formally approved the agreement at its July 20,
1993, meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Susan Mickey
Management Analyst I
A6REENSDiT YOR BRRVZCEB
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between
the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation formed and
operating pursuant to the laws of the State of California
(hereinafter referred to as the ^City^) and THE RANCNO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit public benefit
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ^Foundation").
a=xaa8aaxs
A. Recitals.
(i) City is presently providing to its residents,
principally by and through the vee of its general funds, cultural
and recreational opportunities and services.
(ii) In recognition of the need and desirability of
expanding cultural and recreational programs to the citizens of
the City oP Rancho Cucamonga and the consideration oP the
difficulties posed the public entity to provide the time and
effort needed to be devoted to such expansion, the Foundation was
formed in April of 1987 to lessen the 6urdena of government and
to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human
services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(iii) The Foundation, to facilitate its principal
goal, has undertaken those objeativee and activities including,
but not limited to, the following:
1
I!,
AaR88MBNT FOR BBAVICBB
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between
the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation formed and
operating pursuant to the laws of the State of California
(hereinafter referred to as the "City") and THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit public benefit
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Foundation").
IIITffiIIflIIIITffi
A. Raoitela.
(i) City is presently providing io its residents,
principally by and through the use of Ste general funds, cultural
and recreational opportunities and servlcea.
(ii) In recognition of the need and desirability of
expanding cultural and recreational programs to the citizens of ~
the city of Rancho Cucamonga and the consideration oP the
difficulties posed the public entity to provide the time and
effort needed to be devoted to such expansion, the Foundation was
formed in April oP 1987 to lessen the burdens of government and
to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human
services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(iii) The Foundation, to facilitate its principal
goal, has undertaken those objectives and activities including,
but not limited to, the following:
1