Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/08/18 - Agenda Packet - (2)CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. August 18, 1993 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 rr+ City Councilmembers Denuis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember •tR Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J, Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PAGE City Council Agenda August 18, 1993 1 All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 8:g0 p. m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such Items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Coll: &puet_, Alexander_,Stout _. Williams _, and Gullenez - B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATION 1. Presentation of Proclamations to the Commissioners of the Environmental MonogamenT, Historic Preservation and Public Safety Commissions in honor of their service to the City ontl the Community. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE P tpr rr This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law ,prohibits the City Council M1om addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be Iimtted to five minutes per individual. D. CONSEU7 Ce Punea The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time wilhcut discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councllmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1, Approval of Minutes, August 4, 1993 2. Approval of Warrants. Register Nos. 7/28/93 (FV 92/93), 7/28/93 1 AND B/4/93 (fV 93/94); and Payroll ending 7/15/93 for the Total amount of S 1.956,434.49. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 9 July 31, 1993. PAGE City Council Agenda August 18, 7993 2 4. Approval to auihor¢e the Advedising of the 'Notice InvRing Bids" 14 for the construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Mtlliken Avenue ontl Fahmon} Way, to be funded from TDA Article 8. Account No. 12-4637-9202. RESOLUTION NO.93-157 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILUKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY". IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5, Approval Of the Environmental Initial Study Ports I and II, for the 19 proposed right tum lone of Archiboltl Avenue ontl Bose Line Rood and issuance of tl Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION N0.93158 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT FCR ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT BASE LINE ROAD 6. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts 1 and II for the 34 proposed Highland Avenue Street Improvements locpied at approximateyr 420 feet west and 1250 feet east of locust Avenue and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 93-159 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENVIRONMEMAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE. APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET WEST AND 1.250 FEET EAS7 OF LOCUST AVENUE 7, Approval to expend Asset Seizure Funds 'a purchase bicycles 50 ontl equipment (not to exceed S 10.000), hontl held alcohol breath test devices (not to exceed 53.000), and computers and peripheral equipment (not to exceetl S 14,500), to be funded from Account NO. 7627b511. PAGE ~ (~`~(~ City Couneil Agenda L-+,(: +-J August 18, 1993 3 8. Approval to appropriate 5150.000 from fund 12 TDA Article B 54 (Account No. 12-4637-9202) forthe Construction and Administration of the traffic Signals and Safety Lighting of the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Way. 9. Approval to appropriate 5850,000 from Fund 32 -'Local Measure I" 55 (Account No. 32-4637-9031) and S 170,000 from Fund 35 - 'SB 140' , (Account No. 35-4637-9031) for the construction and odministrotion of the 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst SireeT Improvement Protect. 10. Approval to appropriate 59,000 from Fund G9 -Gas Taz for the 56 Construction antl Administration of the Alia Loma Storm Drain Replacement of the North Terminus of Hermosa Avenue. 11. Approval to order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance 57 District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distrct Nos. 1 and 7 for Trod Nos. 13565 and Tract No. 135655 through -9, located on the north side of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road. submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO.93-160 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 13565 AND TRACT NOS. 13565 5 THROUGH -9 12. Approval to Release the Real Property Improvement Contract 87 and lien Agreement between the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga and Delores Browne. Successor Trustee of the Edith E. Browne Trust, upon the letter's compliance of the payment stipulated in the aforesaid contract. RESOLUTION NU. 93161 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DECOKES BROWNE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE EDITH E. BROW'NE rausT 13. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and 70 Lien Agreement with Vlncenf Martinez for public street improvements at 8762 Vinmar Street. PAGE City Council Agenda August 18, 1993 q t4. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 93-057) between the City 71 of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. 15. Approval to execute agreement (CO 93-058) with San Bernardino 78 County Foodbdnk to continua to serve ds a distribution site for U.S.D.A. Food CommodRies. 16. Approval to execute Terra Vista Town Center Lease (CO 93-059> 89 for City CommunAy Space wRh Western Land Properties 17. Approval to execute Amendment i3 (CO 92-064) with Volley 93 Bosebail Club, Incorporated and the City of Rancho Cucamonga wBh respect to prefened parking paces. 18. Approval to execute Ir,iprovement Agreement Extension for 96 Tracf 13281, located on the northwest comer of Bose Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by M.J. Brock & Sons, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO.93-162 9$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281 19, Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 99 Tract 13303, located on the southeast corner of Mountain View Drive and Tena vista Parkway. submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO.93-163 101 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA. APFM2OVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13303 p. Approval to execute !mprovement Agreement Extension for 102 Traci 13857 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Vinioge Drive, submMed by M.J. Brock & Sons. Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO.93-164 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13857 PAQE I ~G~ City Council Agenda - August 18, 1993 6 E. GONCFNT nwnlunurcc The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the lime of first reading, Second readings are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any Item can be removed for discussion. No I}ems Submitted. F._ ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN ~ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as publle hearings as required by law. Tha Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO EcTABUCH AN IND R RO IND ml IN DlRnlr•r 105 NO. 4. ALON BACF I INF ROAD FROM. A .RIBA D AV NIIF`O H RMOcA AV N I U4L ~(~ R I 2LIA F INDC AND DFTFRMIIVATION OF RESPONaIBI ITV FOR ON~2R~ON OSrs W I I AN PRIVA RESOLUTION NO. 93-165 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISFRICT NO. 4, ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENLIE 2. r'ONCIDERATION OF FOOTHI BOUt YARD cP IFI P nh 117 PMENDA^ENi 93 ~1 - c vv . A request to amend the Specific Plan by adding 'Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing ' Clinics d5 O conditional use in the Specialty Commercial District and odding 'Pharmacies, with or without specialty recoil, under 10,000 square feet', as a permitted use in the Community Commercial Disiric} wtthin Subareas I, 2, and 3. PAGE City Council Agenda August 18, 1993 S RESOLIJiION NO. 93-166 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-01, ADDING 'HEALTH AND ATHLETIC GYMS AND WEIGHT REDUCING CLINICS' AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1.2. AND 3, AND ADDING 'PHARMACIES, WITH OR WITHOUT SPECIALTY RETAIL, UNDER 10.000 SQUARE FEET", AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1, 2. AND 3 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submmed. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submttted, I COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. L CONSIDERATION OF ANTI-GRAFFITI TASK FORCE 14G RECOMMENDATION 2. CONSIDERATION OF MEMORIAL PLAQUE IN NONOR OF PARK AND 213 RECREATION COMMISSIONER SAM PUNTER 3. CONSIDERATION TO DESIGNATE A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND 222 AN A TFRNAT fOR TH A -. 1E OF A IFORNIA IQ ~ ANN I MF T PAGE City Council Agenda August 18, 1993 7 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the nett meeting. These Items will not be discussed at this meeting, only IdentiNed for the next meeting. ~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter tar a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be Ilmited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 12, 1993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. August 4, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A~ CALL TO ORDER A regular mce4ing of the Rancho Cucamonga Ctly Council was heM on Wednesday, August 4, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10$00 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called m order at 7:12 p.m. by Maym Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmcmbers: William 1. Alexander, Charles J. etrquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. 5loal. Also present were: lack Lam, City Manager, James Markman, City Atmrney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager, Rick Oomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner, Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; toe O'Neil, City Engineer, Bob Dominguez. Administrative Services Directoq Susan Stark, Finance 0f6cer, lim Fmst, City Treasurer, Suranne Om, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst tl; Duane Baker, Assistant to dre City Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst Ii: Chief Dennis Michael and Deputy Chief Fire Marshal Lloyd Almond, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protocdon Disuict; Capt. Bruce Zcirrer, Rancho Cucamonga Pollee Deparuncnl; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. r~~r~! B I. Presentation of Certificate of Achievement for Excel levee in Financial Reporting by the City. Mayor Stout presenmd the City's Certifeam of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to Susan Stark along with a personalized award for her prepamtiou of dre Excellence in Financial Reposing. •~.+r• C. COMMIINICATIONS FROM TNF. PIIBLIC No communication was made (mm the public. r.rre• D. CONSENT CALENDAR DI. Approval o(Minutes: July 21, 1993 (Buquet absent) D2, Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/14N3 and 7(11N3 (FY 92N3), and 7!14N3 arrd 721N3 (FY 93N4); and Payroll ending 7/IN3 for the toml amount of 52,140.202.98. City Council Minutes Angus[ 4, 1993 Page 2 U3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Ealing Place Cor Sycamore Inn, Sycamore Inn, Irtcorpomted, 8318 Foothill Boulevard. D4. Approval to amend the 1993/96 Fiscal Year Budget to albw for on-going Final Year 1992193 Community Development Black Cram (CDBG) ProjecLS. D5. Approval of Security Guideiirres for Use of City Community Centers -amending Community Services Department Policy and Procedure Number 11I-02.00, Geateral Facilities Reservarien and Fee Policy. D6. Approval to appropriate 5120,000.00 from FurM 09 - "Gas Tax' (Account No. 09-4637-9002) for the conswction and administration of the Asphalt Overlay on Lucas Ranch Road, from Fourth Street m 5th Street; Sanm Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Sneer; and Helms Avenue, Irom 9th Street b Artow Route. D7. Approval to awmd and aulltorvation for execution of contract (CO 93-052) for 19th Street Recouswction, from Carnelian Street to AmeNyst Street for the amount of $850,713.48 (5773,375.89 plus 10%, contingency) b be funded from Arterial Measure I Account No. 32-4637-9031 m Kruu and KnvC Conswefion and Engirrcering, Irtcuporatal, D8. Approval to awanl and authorirs0on for executlan of contract (CO 93-053) for Asphalt Overlay on HcMs Avenue, between Ninth Street and Arrow Highway; Lucas Ranch Road, Fourth Sweet w Fitch Sueu; and Santa Anita, Fourth Street m End of Road, in the amount of 5101,436.28 (592,214.80 plus 10% contingency), b Manhole Adjusting Contractors of Monterey Park, m be Ponded from Gat Tax Account No. 09-0637.9002. D9. Approval m Release Certificate of Deposit accepted for completion of Urtdergrounding Utilitles fw Tract 11734, located on dx: iroMwest corrrer o(Vineyard Avenue and Artow Highway. DIO. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Cath Surety. Acceptance of Bonds, and File Notice of Completion for Tract 13359, located on the cast side of Sapphire S1reeL between Orchard and Jennet Streets. Release: FaiNful Performance Cash Surety (Street) 583,100.00 Accept Labor and Materials Byrd (Sweet) 83,100.110 MaintrrtartocGuarantee Bond (gucet) 16,fi20.00 RESOLUTION N0.93-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIdE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13359 AND AUTHORIZING THE FB-ING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Alexander, soconderJ by Buquel to approve the stet( recommendations in the staff reptnts contained in the Consent Calendar, with Buquet abstaining from the July 21, 1993 minutes. Mowon carried unanimously, 5-0. t~~r~• No items were submitted. rrr... City Council Minutes August 4, 1993 Page 3 No items were submitted. No items were submitted. F. ADVF.RTISF.D PUBLIC HEARINGS •+r+rr G. PURLIC HEARINCC rrrr rr ~ CITV MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS Hl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE SPORTS FIELD MASTER PLAN Staff mport presented by Suzanne Om, Community Services Manager. Councilmember Buquet stated this has also been reviewed by the Park ami Recreation Subcommittee. Mayor Stout inquired if Ne Sports Advisory Committee has approved This. Suzanne Ott, Community Services Manager, stated yes. Mayor Stow commended sett on their work and how much better die system works now than it use m. He also Nanked the Park and Recreation Commission and the Spsuts Advisory Con,miuce Cor (heir work on this matter. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve the Sports Field Master Plan. Motion carried unanimously, 5-D. +rrrr• H2. @EPORT ON MILLIKEN M TRO -INK SI . eCH D n.. Staff report pmsented by Ice O'Neil, Ciry Engineer. lack Lam, City Manager, added that the schedule was able to be moved up because the property owners are cooperating wiN the City on the dedication of property. ACI70N: Received and filed the report. rrrr+• II3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE Sp IA EV NT A rR NT ( O 9 -0541 WITH VA Y BASEBALL CLI18. INCORPORATED Staff report presented by Linda Daniels, RDA Manager, who retorted m a new page 7 which lud been disvibuvd to be part of (he agreement MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander m approve CO 93-054 with Valley Baseball Club, Inc., as amendrd. Motion carried unanimously. 5-D. .rrrr• City Council Minutes August b, 1993 Page S «.~~~~ No items wem identlfied for the next meeting. r~~~~• K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications wcro mods fmm the publk. •~~~.. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams m recess m an Execufive Session to discuss personnel matters and property negotiations at dte stadium. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The Council recessed at 7:44 p. m. and reconverred at 9:35 p.m., announcing they unanimously approved s one year extension of the City Manager's contract The meeting adpumed at 9:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra 1. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: Y N~ • ~ OOaO 'a a, M1ONmN ~bmN as V~'OmT~ OM1OOONOm00 ~~ Nan .y yN yN and N n~nrvnyy y NNm .~ ^NO m N ~ y ^ W V j ~ ~ ~2~ Onrvy rvwwnnhi-I~nynn M1f~nnw +^J Nnl . ' !! nnl~nM1f~~n hl~y M1Fl~w1~h aPaq ~.a ~ ~ • ti~N M1M1 M1 i i ..°v o ~ • e .. e e ~. . a " ou ° wa .~ w r r'~ y .°.~ ~ a j . a a ,o i^ '~ w Upr w n.. ~ a i z ~ ~ r j i N¢ ¢~ ~H J N ~2~ ~~ S S e~ M1 J N ~ r ~ I n i E y J S j •u Q 'J •l ~ w 1 '~ I vi M1 a ~ u ~ \ RJm ~\uVKa ~ ^~3 ~~~ w ~. N t iJ ~CZ ~ ~= Oi JiOf3 '2 •; n ~ y iii V v t~ V v 'J; = 2h~ LhTw jO.z p7 j7 m Kty ,J,1 ~-u y ~ r~ 2H u N 2 ON IFm~tSV>LF431~ 1~m Sy'O JLStu NO~?u~]o iei ~ircYaeon3¢H~'« Ern~'u ni .% v n _ .~:` it ~ o ~~ _i i ~ i ~~ 'ja"i j 34 °n"a a w LVL.~ O~ JSN Yr•-i nxK u~" nKy = .~~~~ "u z ~.2 na ~ Q~n" a "~°°. .Jia~ ~,;~ a is ~z .~•yw °ir "j=aY~~'~y is .ems moo°f ~~i a.`i.iN ~ ~ ~E<2sYR~IV 60u ~n 0~6fSK )„TO E.nJ w,90p u _¢ ~ >' ~ N _ 4n U ±E~ JJyt L220 YGy ylOw ~LVUE'V, ' v~ yWUFiyLL< 2U >NLL M1~< Y ~( 1 yj~ y Pw~ Ny n10NNmMn G¢Kh OF N~•1N Nin .n N/i ~nFF m.7>]31Y1,1 Jj V'a ~ ~ "~N nNnl Jm m^NOmn ~ ^I ~4M1 Owlny •~~ y e~NT~ ,T N T mQ m J~Tr1SwpNTTFNNn m ~~ 2 YI :i: \• d \n O• •YJ• 020 ~a •S• n2~ p~J l: •zn Z• qt 61 v• >• aao om~ 'oao oJP PTn N rvA~ -pan ^ ++NO OCO PPP PPT PTP TPP al • t 1 • > ; It i +L or .~ i \ o i P \ L ~[ P r r N h i J Y:u i N s 0 1 t o M1 fi b nl uJ UN In b P~ a vJJ • • aOlc >P _ •J i• U Jv N 2 J'1 O d JJ V'J J d Nj~e' wfh JJ J 1 ~- S • J J L V V 1 .~ JJp• _ JJJJ 2oN20 LLZ VJ/: uu 21 ,J ai_ i,T.a u2 T2J2\nY \tidui .~! ~Sy 22L1Z ei rv nLLOV.y N~rw V7w~ •JJ i V~SY h2~ naVJ N ~: 2 h2a ~ _ z£M22 NSq PIw ~ ~ZY \VU 2 JJNh WJ J ~S~SJtz .4pa ~ziLi VJ J i>n i,U iYJia wrJafY\\ nL> •LLLJ'JSr N J u - N aOn uuN hJ2Jn ZJ> wV7aUNR L:-1 rcdN JU S:+~+UL h r-o~~ NT ~Ie-: Nu i-2i ~ .IZrrL `~ » ~x ~.NS ~o~~xz.. ~ ~n T t ~ uHy ~.2.>oY°Y '.S,y „rc" boa>'Y i o J i' »>>Y>~ti>J N o-1 Nmrd++m>m~. N.. LLLF>~ d Nei i y O ZVY rr l _ 22 2 _ N aOVVV J O nIJLNZ2 J /122 N P J V J ~OJ w N V'J U y D :+ W N h 2 N'Y (] T. J V V d J W2uZWnNLL 20 ~. J V2m JM adW Vh ! ~1 1-d 622 VO •~V Wf N20 U mg1Y •V O 2 2KOJdJJ2JN ZdW 02 <MV a J a YWh NJ2 iY <UZ !iU wVZLm nIYdNZ wNwppZ~O Lv J6 VJ 7~'^V L2Jm>lJ2 mho J J< <>N Jhz •SW20~[hg2N6 dm2h\<fNVOlm 61n O<J 2 J J• LNhhn'1N U_m VN_Oh<Lti> 9V¢1 IIZMh O w\<WmW •W<m •N WV6LNJLd<JN WY 4ZYW ~fVMQ •LLJ J•Oi t •SC h2hONLNMM2 Zm OJ l~Nd .JMOh •2 2 Y100< •Y i Y„2f OM OVW LLOWSNIVLLjdKO {•JVmRONMNLM d VO'Z VS<VLOmOJJWNKM2Y hUdhdWd h22UROW OWZ N J mhNGJ<Vh<JhJ2z<J>RR<WWNhhfOLN2<2WdJNGY2 WM ily i VJJOKmJZ 1tWWWJOR> iNMJOONO• MONUIJOW •'J!W I- J r+ «!!f«<f<Ommm90mLOVVUUJUVUJVVV0000 LLIL LLIL 4C OmLi h PNN O.I'Ih NH h/~hNNhNNNhPNm Nlrl<PPmNtiMNgpy0Y0• hNfy m P1NNN N~pN•N~ONO~PNNPPOrah h.ihNP•1NOhhPhNIN •1~fN N ~PP~IOmOm MV r ynlNhN ChON wON• P N n1 PI wn1TNM1N~TT Nh N~4MN '1 n1 Ir1 I~ImTNN Ary111 NN NtiT M 3 W: u• °c~ • ~ m~S \~< \• m~f o:> •Z W1 h: o• zi rci ii •l a m v u O m 4NP 1 usi =~0 V t00 ¢r¢ ON Jw V W •L •z •¢ •o ~O •F •W 1 1 1 1 1 NammWOryP«mgnf-nPNamm amN<mNe N~pNOPp O N F • 00 mawmhmnmaOhONPmNPNmF TPFWCNIrONNFw O N a hP rNmPmaNaNONOOmNNOOm mIONAmOmOryFO 0 w ma m• fFNnNFrnPrN 'ONFm naN a V •< O m w J a N m h P m 'O O n r n w r P r« n n n n n n n n ianwnananw was ian m<.oFNmFinaNaePe.nNnaNaFmPO.~NmaNOnmPe..NmaNaFmPe~N nnnadaJnm gin ii°nNNN~°n~M~'Mw wl"nNMwa.NrMV.r.N.NrnMM:.M~Nw.mnrN~Nx PPPPPPPPPPwPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP OFFFFFFFFFFFFFnhFFhFnwnFFhFFFFFFFFFFhFFFFFFFFFrFrFFF U t 1 11!1!1 I 1!! ! !m! ! ! I! f ! i .. • N m a w o ~ i H n iPm NmeP m PPPP W UJ LP V O i\F FVh F F F h„NF G UZj i F r M \ \\ 6 YV fJTZ mN IL ov vwuav vl ~FS~ ON caw v iW V VWVWV N¢ YS ¢LOh WV J WV VUVZV V V VwwV OOrM FV f O \6 qL rVOL W ZV a h 1 i 00 O !O p« ! ZM L \ m L \\ NJi •Z ZJ N LL 2 3F ~' ~ s_s_ rc¢«WN m ic¢ m O N N y a{p2rp Z Of .W¢ J uW: ¢ W Y N 6 ° O VV /i ZW6N=Z JLLi¢Y 2uS¢ 2K Sf rN i \ J <f 002L• G SVJ fCf2 VNfO NW C F V F N4«O J<Nprp S~Yp N JV O Z W[i«FJrw~JN¢[W WJWZ WLVW6 NNN O LL V S FFMO FL<2«N'JNJN r rf rp0««« FU> O Z 22JUpyfPmJ >M< 2NZU 2Mf3>J U F J ° WW Np p1J •U6WZiLP «Z« hZOY LL W 6 N V O „ LL1L f4LLYLL LLr i MWW tOfO fW fOLL ZLL < W O ~ ww iL7M J «20~W ZrNLJZw rL¢Wi2'J N6LLN p O N 00 NZNWZYON4 WiNy J 4 6Z fNNZOr Wr r J OwZO Zwh V~jf W rm 1FN y N O Y U JJW¢NLN¢JWWVWtp VJW 'J JFZJ~w p W ~ 64 UyUFJO¢N<VrfJN U YN yUN WUNw2¢¢ 2 V > m «VLLNW<V«2JLLOdWMP«m N06M2M'J JJFym p C P C ZLLLwp¢F> MLO ONS 20 hi~~JJ ZNLLry~WODf W s ° WW WLLJ3WSWNLL W ~W<wOWO MWJ~W LLOS > F J r a r >Y°WNOM6m°26Uf6P>T>V ><LL>0°Jf 6UUN r V P r i u u N z : a N ZV V 6 2 MW W N p « r[_ yV_U_ V i « N J r OOZT w NUR zU<w 2 ~ J N [O24 O JWN• ¢N CWMS •U Y.LL N i o ° Fi rz uu°i. i¢°SZ°pa ~ F r rM WwG VTON««ZhVUf J° 2 ¢ Z [> QY6 NNSJi NJM r G• «J NF«w <OfN02 4 N i y i o ii`o r>N zc>z ~VLW z° pu r 2 2 Z« LL 2z 4[ p0 <SNM NZ WWW «JVWMUVi WFN r J iNV N0.VJr <M¢wNV« p Z<¢ VVr°°JY6 r < O V Wr «WILU OONhhWr4M Or<» « w ¢N O¢wMt s4N6YNOrZZ «OSrZrOWN<WiW [2rr i Y[ P O fi Wr OWtf<SN0.2VSJN W f 2 ROV«OMN O4<1 NQ2< [ F N W it f¢V~ hl JWWUry wlt0 \ V N VW JYVJ6WNrNh ¢J¢SMrhJO z O r O OJ[N9« J f<W;M«p0 V « [ G z ') N «V 1<f « « IppOUYVVVVVUV N wV rye mFaO r~pmhFFmrOmm< r aP q• r ammJmnanamurh Fr°-w h m rr ao ew< h ao P m m rNN nr n Nr Y LL ¢ L r N ~ J u oWLL r N um OM h 2 Z r¢f < WSW OU ZNL W 06Fr¢ r iprf«N OwJ rOWaW V¢• ZLLWJ W7 «b «OMN NUZO ZNG FVIJiOi •rNM Rw<mu¢i lhili wuielz.~ •MhUrih2tM162 SJrWNNUWSJJ• ~fww««f mef«of VOOOOgWWWLLLLILLL NnpFPOnwarnhN nP„mmNnomnaf Om rINIFOrPO w NN mM 6 .. g"- 9_.~' B.- _ ~ '' ~ f E ~ [' _ _ _ y~~eY .. ~ }__iP I S. B:C g~s ' 8 CAB. 1 ..' 9 E y °A- _. ~y _ :Ai a ~ wg _ s6:=Y . 4 ~ ~ o~~~ rt ~ , ~ ,. . ~ E F j~ B_ - 16: si ~'~~ F zsy ~ ,igC 'y ~'. 3 :. A ~. 4.. ~' % ~ \ 1 _. .. 9 x ~ % HI 9 __,- cr.c z._.ssac~sca~~aSa`~ _ __ _ =r`a € s . ~ `~ ~.~ -- e'E6 - ~E Bfp P ~'~ .... ~.°.F~.~°nRi9'~5. `¢, ~} RR. ~.°b'!: S M SC .^.n'd S m °8~.^~~>>~. ~R RRRrv8AF8Ra°8RR ....... .. .. .... .. .. .. . AA EEE~°-~ mm:m T_. P v8.=,2 P. S RSRBgS es v sZ~ss'a~'ce%Y S`$a2F~8ReFS8 ~ YIE .° 8^°.L. _ Y. ~ °OSRSeR s £~£. AR€°e $°°°£.°+e& 5e° L'.l°n F. 9 $ c k :>£zH,%3845 ~%R£€aae~?,°~Sc .°' Ac-pB F g ° _. ... YY. .°.R.`. <.R.,bRSPoa3 FYY.^.Rc$`-'% :: r`. ~ '^. i °.: c i~::YYYY'iYYYVYy'Y YL'~'Y Y'YW Y ::'• Y'~+ Y RpP:~ .K : y ` Y ~~ . y ~ Y ~ ~ ~~ > ~0 RESOLUTION N0. ~- ~J`' 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY'', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE RIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for Lhe construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, OE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AYENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY." DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed fa advertise a5 required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and followingtwords a difiguresa tod~'Ltisement shall be substantially in the "NOTICE INYITIN6 SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of RarH:ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIYEN that the Bald City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk 1n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on ar before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 9TH day of SEPTEMBER 1993, sealed Dids or proposals for the "CONSTRUCTION OF~71C1fFF1C SIGRID•S-AAd'~SAFET4 LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AYENUE ANO FAiRMONT NAY" in said City. Bids will be opened and publtaly read lmnediately 1n the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made an a form prodded for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY ". PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter i, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevatltng rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character 1n the iocality 1n which the puD11c work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevatltng rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of Der diem wages are on file in the 15 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party an request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f 25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic 7s paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly Indentured apprentices may be emplcyed 1n the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to Lhe provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentlceable occupation to apply to the ,joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used 1n the perfornmnce of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to .journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of Coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent 1n the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices to training 1n the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show theL 1t is replacing at feast 1/30 of Its nmmbershlp through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices ar Journeymen 1n any apprentlceable trade on such contracts and 1f other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 to the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and Is other requirements mny be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Adainistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shad constitute a legal day's vrork for all workmen employed 1n the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of Callfornla as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of Bald Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposai cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract if the same 15 awarded to him, and 7n event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. if the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next Lowest bidder, the amount of the iowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1008) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (1008) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered Into between him and the said City oP Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposai form bas not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shell possess a Cless "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) 1n accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Callfornla Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. 17 The work is to he done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of Lhe City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the Ctty Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E35.00, said 535.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of E15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth 1n the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and et the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves Lhe right to reject any and ail bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Gated Lhis day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 ayor ATTEST: y e ADVERTISE ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ^-. STAFF REPORT - DATE: August 18, 1993 T0: Aayor and Members of the City Council ~- - Jack Lam, AIr.P, C1 ty Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I ANO II, FOR THE PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE P,9A0 ANO ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE. RECOMMENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution, accepting and approving the Enviromaental Initial Study, Part I and II, for the proposed improvement at the east side of Archibald Avenue from 490' south of 3ase Line Road to Base Line Road and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This report presents an Enviroranental Assessment Initiai Study for the proposed Improvement for Archibald Avenue, from Base Line Road to 490' south of Base Line Road. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit constructlan of the above mentioned Improvements. Addition of right turn lane is necessary to reduce traffic congestion. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project Nill not rreate a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these Improvements be classified as categorically exempt. Respe ulty submitted, i~ ~~~ W1111 J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:Iy W ~ ~ q Q W F. 4 ~ J W J U N J T J J ~ r U 3 2 U 30N 3ntl N3AVN n p wa N ~_ ~~ 0 ~~ ~U 3fIN3ntl Ol BIN~tltl o a e -y q r o ~ > s ~ m ~ ~ w 2 J I J - 3 ~ IW/i _ ~~ O C N a 0 S LL ~ a 3f1N 3np N w'I'13N 0 a 0 a G~ 0 NIA JI p~ 30N3ntl oa A3NIn J N I 4..L_ c~ G Y Z V_ clir of RANCND alcAiaNSii ENYIRDNMENTAL TNFORiIAifON FO1M PART I - INITIAL STUDY General Inforwation 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho CucamonyaR 10500 Civic Center Drive, _ Rancho Cucamonga; t;a -HZ73D - 2. Address of project: Archibald Avenue - Base Line Road to 490' south of Base Line Road ~-' "-`- 3, Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: City of Rancho Cucam~on~a 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9I73D;~nLac't-Ffenry Ffura os _ _ _ _ 85~'~-- 4, indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: N/A 5, List and descrl6e any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Street closure permit; approval of project by City Councii,_CSty of Rancho Cucamonga. -v 6, Existing zoning dt strict: Community Commercial 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): P%ject Description and Effects: See Attached 8. Site Size. 3. Square footage. 10. Number of floors of construction. N/A 11. Amount of off-street parking provided. N/A 12. Attach plans. N/A 13. Proposed scheduling. 14, Associated project. NIA 15, Anticipated incremental development, N/A 16. If residential, Include the number of units, Schedule of unit sties, range of sate prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loadfng facilities. N/A 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. [f institutional, indicate the mat or function, estimated employment per shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the proteC t. N/A 20. If the protect involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the.appllcatton is required. N/A Are the following items applicable to the protect or its effects? Discuss below all ite;ns checkeA yes (attach addstlonal sheets as necessaryl. Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. - - 22, Change in scenic views or vistas from exlsting residential X areas or public lands or roads. '-' - 23, Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X protect. - 24. Significant amounts of sol td waste or litter. _ X 25, Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water qualtty X or quantity, or alteration of exlsting drainage patterns. - - 27. Substantial change 1n exlsting noise or vibration levels 1n X the vicinity. - - 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. _ X 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as X toxic substances, flammables or explosives. - 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, X fire, water, sewage, etc .1. - - 31. Substantially increase foss it fuel consumption (electricity, X 011, natural gas, etc.1. - - 32. Relationship to a larger protect or series of protects. X Environ~ental Setting: See attached 33. Describe the proiect site as it exists before the profect> including information on topography, soil stabltity, plants and animals, and arty cul wral, historical or scenic aspects. Oescribe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34, Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals anA any culturai, historical or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residential, cammerciai, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartrt~ent houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and tnfonnatton required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the hest of ~ knowledge and belief. I further understand Lhat additional Information mAy be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Plannln9% DlvLtsion. ~ " Date: $-/b•93 Signawre: A~j~''• ~L,..,~Nd~• enry ra os Ti ti e: Associate Engineer, P.E. ATTACMENT - PART I Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 27, 33, 34 The project involves additional right turn lane, reconstruction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, drive approaches and relocating street lights. The project covers approximately 490 l,F. of additional lane. The anticipated project schedule for construction is in Fiscal Year 93/94. The project site is located 1n community commercial area. Ail street improvements have existed for several years. The proposed improvements will not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or aqy obvious historical, cultural or scenic aspects. 4oise, vtbration, dust and odors will increase at the project sites only during the pavement removal; and replacements, etc. After completion of the project, all noise, vtbration, dust and odors created by this project, Mil cease to exist and return to the pre-project levels. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENYI RONMENTAL CHECKLIST I, 3ACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civic Center Drive ___________ nc o ucamon a, ~.a _^__ 3. Date of Checklist Submitted August 18, 1993 ` 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Right turn lane on Arch_t_baid Avenue at Baso Line Road. I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Hill the proposal result 1n: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes 1n geologic substructuresT _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ X _ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief featuresT _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical featuresT ._ X e. Aqy increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the s1teT X f. Changes in deposltlon or erosion of beach sands, or changes 1n siltation, deposltlon or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or 1ake7 _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or s1m11ar hazardsT _ X ?age 2 YES MAYBE NO 2. Air. '.1111 the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ _ X b. The creation of ob,{ectionable odors: _ _ X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change Tn climate , either locally or reglonallyl _ _ x 3. Water. Mill the proposal result in: a. Chanyes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? _ _ x b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface +a ter runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of Flood waters? _ X d. Change in the amount of surface water 1n airy hody of water? _ _ x e. Discharge iota surface waters, or in arty alteration of surface water quality, Including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ _ R f. Alteration of the direction or rate of Flow of ground waters? _ _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- trawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer Sy cuts ar excavations? _ _ R h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ _ X 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as floodin ti l g or da waves? _ _ X 4. ?l ant Life. N111 the proposal result 1n: a. Change to the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (lncludiny trees g , shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic p antsl7 _~ _ R Page 3 YES MAYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of aRy unique, rare or endangered spectes of plants? c. Introduction of new spectes of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Ni11 the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of spectes, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, 6enthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of arty unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new spectes of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration ar movement of animals? d. Oeterloration to existing fish or wildlife habl to t? 6. Na1se. N111 the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. L1 ht and Glare. will the proposal produce new g or g areT 8. Land Use. N111 the proposal produce new 1~g~or glareT 9. Naturai Resources. Nill the proposal result 1n: a. Increase 1n the rate of use of aqy natural resourcesT 10. Risk of Uoset. N111 the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (lnciudTng, but not limited to 011, pesticides, chemicets or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? b. Possible interference with en emergency response pt an or an emergency evacuation plan? X x _ _ x X X X X X X X X X X Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. W111 the proposal alter the acT atT; distribution, density, or growth rate of Lhe human population of an areal _ X 12. Housin Nill the proposal affect existing pus ng or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Mill the proposal resu t n: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X _ b. Effects on exlsting parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X _ c. Substantial impact upon exlsting transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X _ e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? _ X f. Increases in traffic hazards to nrotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X _ 14. Public Services. M111 the proposal have an effect upon, or resu 1n a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. F1 re protection? X _ b. Poi ice protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Mafntenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. End, Wi11 the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the developmen*. of new sources of energy? I5. Utilities. N111 the proposal result in a need oi~r new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Cammmlcattons systems? d. Water supply? e. Waste water facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Sol 1d waste facilltiesl 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result tn: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Nill the proposal result to Lhe o struct on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result 1n the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19, Recreation. W111 the proposal result 1n an mpa~ ct upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Doge 5 YES MAYBE NO X x x X X X X X x X X X X X X x Page 6 YES MAYBE NO 20. Cultural Resources. a. W711 the proposal result 1n the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological s1te9 g b. Wili the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or ob,{ectl c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Nill the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X x 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the enviromment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wilditfe species, cause a fish or wlldiife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal con~mmlty, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehlstory4 _ _ h. Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-tern, to the disadvantage of tong-term, environmental goals? (A short-Lenn impact on the environment 1s one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of Lime Wh11e long-term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively conslderable4 (A project mAY impact on two of more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these Impacts on the environment is significant.) _ _ d. Does Lhe project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indtrectiy7 X X X X X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra vc escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.) Page 7 i. Earth There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and compaction for the replacement and/or widening sections of asphalt concrete pavement. 3. Hater ~~Iew curb, gutter and catch basin will facilitate better drainage. 6. Noise a. Existing noise levels wiil increase due Lo equipment operations during construction, but could be mitigated by the ingtaltatlon of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 13. Transportation/Circulation a, b, d ands During iTie construction operations, traffic and parking will Increase on surrounding street near the protect perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation and arq Poss1b111ty of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. 14. Public Services a, an c. 1s protect will have an interim effect on the present pattern of clrcuiatlon of vehicles (1.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation pattern Impacts can be mitigated by prior notlftcatton to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date oral duration of said work . IV. DETERMINATION o e comp eted by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this Tnltial evaluation: X 1 find the proposed protect COULD NOT have a slgnlflcant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a slgnlflcant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect. A NEGATIYE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. _ I find the proposed protect MAY have a 51gn1f1cant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IbP//ACT REPORT 1s required. Date b - /o _9~_ lf7• ~,, ~.r(,. -"~3 gna re Henry Murakoshi Assoc late En ineer P.E. e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 18, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Milltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND fI FOR THE PROPOSED HIGHLAND AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET NEST AND 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AYE, AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE. RECOIQEMDATION accept ng abnd appro~vingethehEnvlrenmental InitialaS~tuQytPartstIcand Ilsfortthe proposed Highland Avenue Street improvements, located at approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue and issuance of a categorical exempt{on therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Envirommental Quality Act. BIIGC6ROUMU/NW.TSIS This report presents an environmental assessment initial study for the proposed Highland Avenue street improvements located at approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of locust Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned Improvements. Said improvements generally entail widening and rcstrtping of the existing pavement for eastbound right turn Lane and westbound left turn lane purposes going Into Locust Avenue. It is the Engineering staff's finding that the environment,oandttherefore recommend thatitheseclmprovements bemciasslfiedtas categorically exempt. Respectfully ltted, ~~~~~ v` Niiltam J. 0' 1 City Engineer NJO:JS:Ia Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~3'/.Jg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET WEST AND 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City Counc7l of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Highland Avenue street improvements located at approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue. WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Envirommental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Envlrommental Ouality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, the C1LY Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Envirommenta ssessment Initial Study and issuarh:e of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Highland Avenue street improvements located at approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue. SECTION 2: The CTty Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant toto tF~alifornta Environmental Quality Act. kpGW.AI~ AVE. '~ (±420 FT. WEST AND ±1250 FT. EAST OF LOCUST AVE) YICIN{TY MAID CITY OF RAIICHD CUCAIMINGA E1IYIRONIENfA1 INFORIMT(gl FORM PAIIT I - INITIAL STUDY General Information 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 41730 2. Address of project: Highland Avenue 3420' west and t1250' east of Locust Avenue. 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho r~~r,~,,,..,,.~ re o'r'f7a-r pis F-Yi'~rtf7~e 7'IDm1-ava'_'TII~l 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: N/A 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this protect, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Street Closure Permit, State Encroachment Permit: Aooroval of oroiect y y aunt v o ant ucamonoa 6. Existing zoning district: N/A 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Collector Roadway (State Hwy 30) Project Description and Effects: See Attached 8. Site Size. 9. Square footage. 10. Number of floors of construction. N/A 11. Amount of off-street parking provided. N/A l2. Attach plans. N/A 13. Proposed scheduling. 14. Associated project. N/A 15. Anticipated Incremental development. N/A 16. If residential, Include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A 18. 1f industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. If institutional, indicate the motor function, estimated employment per shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the protect. N/A 20. If the protect involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N/A Are the following item: applicable to the protect or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. '~ - 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X areas or public lands or roads. - - 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X protect. - - 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X _ 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. - - 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in X the vicinity. - - 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. _ X 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as % toxic substances, flammables or explosives. - 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, X fire, water, sewage, etc.l. - - 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity % , oil, natural gas, etc. 1. - - 32. Relationship to a larger protect or series of protects. X Enviroisental Setting: See attached 33. Describe the protect site as it exists before the protect, including i nformaLi an on topography, soil stab111 ty, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe arly existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, conmerclal, etc.), intensity of Land use (one-family, apartment Douses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certi flcati on I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of ~ ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of a0' knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information mqy be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can 6e made by the Planning Division. Date: ~ ^ 3- ~ 3 Signature: ~M~Q ~Q~.,~~„ ATTACHMEIIT - DART I Project Description and Effects: 8, 9, 13, 25, 27, 33 and 34 The project consist of A.C. pavement widening and restriping for transition, for east bound right turn lane and west bound left turn lane purposes going into Locust Avenue. The pavement to be widened is approximately 24,000 square feet and scheduled for construction within fiscal year 1993/94. The project is located in a partially developed residential area along Highland Avenue (State Hwy. 30~, approximately 420 feet west and 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue, the northerly side of the project area is a vacant land and no residential structure exists. The proposed improvemerRS will not have substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or arty obvious historical, cultural, or scenic aspects. Noise, vibration, dust and odors will increase at the project site only during construction process, after completion of the project, all noise, vibration, dust and odors created by this project will cease to exist and return to its normal occurrences. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611 PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST L BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Propone~ 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 989- 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Hi hland Avenue at Locust Avenue Improvements (1420' west and tl eas o ocus venue I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES IMYBE NO 1. Earth. will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures4 _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the so11t X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features4 _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or laket _ - X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ _ X Page 2 YES MAYBE ND 2. Air. Mill the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors: X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Mater. Nill the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? - _ X b. Changes Tn absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? - _ X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood watersl _ _ X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of waterl X e. Discharge Into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground watersl X g. Change 1n the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. Pla nt Life. Mill the proposal result in: a. Change In the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plarKs)7 T _ X Page 3 YES MRYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of aRY agricultural crop? _ _ X 5. Animal Life. Mill the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, ftsh and shell- fish, benthtc organisms or insectsl? - _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of aW unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals tnto an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? x d. Deterioration to existing fish ar wildlife habitat? - _ X 6. Noise. N111 the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. will the proposal produce new leg or g are? _ _ X e. land Use. M111 the proposal produce new TTgFi: or glare? X 9. Natural Resources. Mill the proposal result 1n: a. Increase 1n the rate of use of any natural resources? _ X 10. Risk of Upset. 41111 the proposal Involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? x b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X Page 4 YES MAYBE HO 11. Po ulation. Mill the proposal alter the oca on, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ X 12. Housing Mill the proposal affect existing ouil-sing or create a demand for additional housing) _ _ X 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Mill the proposal a~ignif can resu s n a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal _ _ X b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities) _ _ % c. An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities) _ _ % 13. Trans ortation/Circulation. Nill the proposal r~ n: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? - _ X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ % d. Alterations to Dresent patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goads? _ X _ e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic4 _ _ % f. Increases to traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyNists or pedestrians? _ X _ 14. Pubilc Services. Nill the proposal have an effect upon, or resuTf in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas4 a. F1 re protection? _ _ X b. Police protectlon4 _ _ % c. Schools? X Page 5 YES MAYBE NO d. Parks or other recreational facilities) X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ - X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Hill the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - - X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Hill the proposal result in a need orfi' new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? X c. Communications systems2 X d. Mater supply? X e. Haste water facilities? _ _ X f. Flood control structures? _ _ X g. So11d waste facilities) X 17. Human Health. Mill the proposal result 1n: a. Creation of aRy health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards) _ _ X 18. Aesthetics. N111 the proposal result to the o s-b~cfion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Hill the proposal result 1n an mpa~~n the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Page 6 YES MAYBE NO 20. Guttural Resources. a. Wiil the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? ._ _ X b. W111 the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or obtect? _ _ X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would aff°_ct unique ethnic cultural values? _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact areal X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or w11d11fe popuiation to drop below self-sustaining Levels, threaten to eliminate a plate or animal coamuntty, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the orator periods of Californ la history or prehistory? X b. Does the protect have the potential to ach!eve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-tern, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time While tong-term impacts wiil endure well into the future). X c. Does the protect have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A protect may Impact on two of more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment 1s significant.) T X d. Does the protect have environmental effects wh+ch will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Page 7 III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION arra ve escr p ono env ronmen a impacts.) See Attached Sheet IV. DETERMINATION o e comp a ed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on _ the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION rill be prepared. I find that although the proposed prodect could have a significant effect on the environaent, there rill not be a significant effect Tn this case because the mltigatlon measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. X I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19, _ Class 1C, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Date ~.3 -q3 /~pM.~..Q --5 gna ure ~^"~ Cw~-Z ~~ ~iT~- ATTACNERi - PART II Discussion of Environmental Impacts I. Earth b. There will be subgrade and aggregate base preparation and compaction for the widening sections of the asphalt concrete pavement. 6. Noise a. Existing noise level will increase due to equipment operation during construction period only. The presence of the housing units close to the prot'xt site along the south side of Highland will not greatly be affected due LO the presence of a 6 ft. block wall. In any rate 1t can be mitigated by the installation of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of the equipment. 13. Transportation/Circulation a, d a f During construction operation, alteration of the present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation will be needed, and therefore traffic on surrounding streets near the protect perimeter will Increase. Any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclist or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. APPENDIX E NOTICE OF EXF]pTION T0: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 P.O. Box 807 Sacramento, California 95814 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Engineering Division X Clerk of the Board County of San Bernardino 385 N. Arrow ea ve., nd Floor n ernar no, H1 bland Avenue at Locust Avenue Im rovements ro ec e Ni bland Avenue 1420 ft. west and 11250 ft. east of Locust Avenue ro ec oca on - Dec c Rancho Cucamon a San Bernardino ro ec oca on - y ro ec oca on - oun y Cit of Rancho Cucamon a ame o u c gency prov ng ro ec Cit of Rancho Cucamon a Joe Stofa Associate En sneer ame o erson or gency arry ng ro ec xemp a us: ec ne Ministerial (Sec. 15073) ' Declared Emergency (Sec. Emergency Protect (Sec. ~ Categorical Exemption. 15071 (a)) 15071 (b) and (c)) State type and section number. Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1C easons w pro ec s exemp Joe Stofa, Assoc late Engineer 909 989-1862 2372 on~Person rea o e Te'lep one x ens on If filed by applicant: i. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the pro,~ect7 Yes No Date Received for Filing SiQnatu -~'i~~~~~~il e my nn n ~ irnrrn nr.n ~ vnwrn ~ 9 STAFF REPORT ~~'~v , V~ ¢ [ 4 '. DATE: AUGUST 18, 1993 Fri U U:~-- T0: MAYOR ARD NSMBBR3 OF THS CITY COUACIL 1B]7 JACK LAM, CITY NANAGSR A.I.C.P. FROM: BRUCE ZSINBR, CNISF OP POLICE SUBJECT: ASSET SEIZURE EYPBNDITURS REQUEST Funds in the asset seizure account are the result of legal proceedings against assets of narcotics offenders. There Ss currently $210,261 in this account, Health and Safety Code 11489 describes use of these funds and places only two limits on how they can be spent, 1. They must be used "exclusively to support the law enf orcemen t...efforts of those agencies". 2. The money "shall not supplant any state or local funds that would [otherwise] be ^ade available" to the agency. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would like to purchase the following items utilizing funds from the Asset Seizure Account. As per Section 11489 of the Health and Safety Code, these items will be used exclusively to support the law enforcement efforts of the department. These expenditures are not supplanting any city funds that would otherwise be made available. PURCHASE OP ADDITIONAL BICYCLES AND EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the expenditure of not more than 510,000 foz the following, Six (6( fully equipped bieyc lea for use by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Bicycle Enforcement Team. Uniforms and equipment to outfit seven (7) additional bicycle patrol members. A battery charging station for bicycle lights. Funds to provide for ongoing maintenance of the existing and additional bicycles. BACKOROOND: Since Stns inception in May of 1992, The Bicycle Enforcement Team has had a positive effect in Rancho Cucamonga. The feedback from citizens of the community has been overwhelming. There are areas of the city that are in need of the services of the bicycle petrol and their specialized style of Solution Oriented Policing. Shopping Centers, Apartment Complexes and other arses not readily accessible to automobiles can benefit from the presence of this unit. The Police Department, unfortunately, hea more volunteers then bicycles. We currently have inquiries from three (3) regular officers and four (4) reserves that wish to parilcipete Sn the bicycle patrol. The requested bicycles come equipped with ell the necessary items to function ea part of the 8lcycle Enforcement Teem. All items of equipment purcheeed for the off Scare will belong to the 8lcycle Enforcement Team with the exception of the bicycle riding shorts. Each officer will be reaponaible for purchasing a compatible holster to fit hie individual weapon ae well ea a shirt to 6e worn whsle on petrol. The purcheee of the battery charging stets on will allow the batteries to be charged in approximately tour hours time. It will also increase the aerviee life of the batteries, thereby increasing the service life of the lighting systems. When the original bicycles were purcheeed funds were not allocated for ongoing maintenance end repairs. The requested 92,000 will fund these expenses for the original bieycles and the new additions. PURCHASE OP HAND HELD ALCOHOL BREATH TEST DEVICES RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the expenditure oP not more then $3000.00 from thm I.eeet Seizure Account for the purcheee of four (4) Aleo-Sensor iV hand held breath teat devices. BACKOROVND: The Rancho Cueemonge Police Department has en aggressive progrsm in place to combst the crime of drunk driving. The department trains officers to identify potential under the lnf hence drivers. 51 We also participate in monthly Against Drunk Driving (A.D.D.) teak force operations and operate a monthly Driving Under the Influence (p.U.I.) check points in the city. Every contact with a potential violator starts with the officer making decisions based on objective symptoms of the individual such as speech, appearance, demeanor etc.. If, after these initial observations the officer feels 1t Sa warranted he then sake the driver to perform certain field sobriety testa. These teats assist the of Picer in making a decision on whether or not to make an arrest. The testa require aub]ective conclusions on the pert of the officer es to the degree of SntoxlcaCion and can sometimes 6e confusing Sf a subject is under the influence oP drugs or a combination of drugs and alcohol. The Alco-Sensor IV provides an accurate, simple and economical method of determining a subject's blood alcohol level. These devices have proven to be invaluable 1n determining 1f a suspect !s under the SnPluence of alcohol end the degree of intoxication. They also assist in determining if the aub]ecta symptoms might be caused by substances other than alcohol. COMPUTHR BQUIPMBNT RHCOMMHNDATZON: Recommend that the C1 ty Council authorize the purchase of computer equipment that includes four computers with term3nale and software along with two laser printers and peripherals to network She hardware, not to exceed $1.4,500.00. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department responds to more cells for aervlee end takes more reports than any other Sheriff's Station 1n Sen Bernardino County. Even eo, the trenecriptlon of dictated reports ie still being done by typewriter. Over the peat several years our clerical staff has been unable to keep up with the trenecriptlon demands pieced upon them by the petrol and detective divisions. This has necessitated curtafling dictation of reports and requiring officers to handwrite complete criminal or traffic reports in many lnetancea for extended periods of time. Having to do this has caused considerable delays !n the processing of reports to get criminal complaints or to the lnveetigetlon division to conduct follow-up on crimes. Several options exist. Tha first option would be to buy e VAX/Digital eyetem through the County of San Bernardino. Dependent upon which Digital eyetem we purchased, the price would range from 917,000 to $30,000. The County system would include the WPS Plua word proeessinq capability along with the Csllfornie Lew Ifnforcemeni Tracking System (CLST9) end Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) end the Records Menegement System (RMS) through the Sheriff's Department. The County Off7ce of Menegement Services (OMS) would provide automatic beck-ups of the lnformetion entered end would oversee the entire system. In sdditlon to the unit cost for the equipment 1n this option, there would also be an ongoing yearly coat for OMS support of approximately $13,867. Option #2 would involve the purchase of a "stand alone" PC system which would include four (~) PC's, two (2) lever printers, tape back-up, power source Wck-up and software for a one time cost of approximately $19,500.00 All of this equipment Se competlble with VAX/Digital systems if the need should arise sometime 1n the future. The equipment would W walntained by the City rather then the County. CLBTS, CAD end RMS would not W a feature of this system but could be expanded to include these Stems 1n the future should the need srise. In consideration of our current Heads along with the ability to expand end be competlble with future plena of the County end City, we suggest that "Option #Z" fs the Wet choice for the short term as well as long term needs of the Police Department. The quality of current computers systems with word processing capability that include spell cheek end thesaurus, provide obvious bane! lta to expedient end proteasional results that ere not eveflmbls with typewriters. Re§pect lly~3 bmi a ., ~ i B!'ucs Ze>~,'P.llYe! oP Police BZ/bz /~ W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: August 18, 1993 T0: MAyor and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, CT L1' Manager FROM: 'Ai~liam J. O'Ne11, City Engineer BY Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE 5150,000 FROM FUND 12 TDA ARTICLE 8 (ACCOUNT N0. 12-4637-9202) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT NAY It is recommended that the Ctty Council appropriate f150,U00 from Fund 12 TDA Article 8 Lo pay for the construction and administration costs pertaining Lo the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of M111ken Avenue and Fairmont illy. The protect 1s scheduled for award at this Council meeting. At this time it 1s necessary to appropriate the funds for construction. Respectfullysubmitted, ff ~c~~ Nilllam J. Neil City Engineer 'dJO:LRDad i~ ~.ii x yr nruVx,nv x;ux;evivi~iV xit~ STAFF REPORT GATE: August 18, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE f850,000 FROM FUND 32 - "LOCAL MEASURE I" (ACCOUNT N0. 32-4637-9031) AND f170,000 FROM FUND 35 - "SB 140" (ACCOUNT N0. 35-4637-9031 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE 19TH STREET FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO AMETHYST STREET It 1s recamnended that the City Council appropriate (850,000 from Fund 32 - "Local Measure I" and (170,000 from Fund 35 -"SB 140" to pay for the construction and administration cost pertaining to the 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. This protect was awarded at the August 4 Council meeting. It is anticipated that construction will begin by September 1, 1993. AL thi: time it 1s necessary Lo appropriate the funds for construction. It 1s expected that current year revenues will exceed expenditures for the year thereby making this protect possible to this fiscal year. Respectfully bmitted, Ni111am J. 0 N 1 City Engineer NJO:MDL:jh cc: Purchasing W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~'~ ' GATE: August 18, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council . Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Monte Prescher, Public Norks Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE 59.000 FROM FUND 09 - GAS TAX FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN REDLACEMENT AT THE NORTH TERMINUS OF HERMOSA AVENUE RECOMENDATIpI It is recom~ended that the City Council appropriate 59,000 from Fund 09 - Gas Tax to pdy for the construction and administration costs pertaining to the Alta Lama Storm Drain Replacement at the north terminus of Hermosa Avenue. 8ACK6ROUND/IIMIILTSIS The protect was awarded at the Council meeting of Juiy 21, 1993. It is anticipated that construction will begin as soon as funds are approved. Funds will be required from Gas Tax to supplement Lhe assessment district funds. Thirty-51x thousand dollars was previously appropriated in July from Fund 80 - Alta Loma Assessment District 84-2 (Account No. 80.4637- 9220y. The total pro,{ect budget for FY 93/94 is 545,000 (536,000 + f9,000). Respectfully submitted, I N111fam J. O'NeF1~ City Engineer NJO:MP:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT `~ DATE: August 18, 1993 T0: M4yar and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: NTiliam J. O'Neil, CTty Engineer BY Niltie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATIONS TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING tMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT N0. 13565 AND TRACT NOS. 13565 -5 THROUGH -9, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET AND EAST OF MARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION It is recamnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexations to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 7 for Tract No. 13565 and Tract Nos. 13565-5 through -9. BACKfiR0UN0/ANALYSIS Tract No. 13565 and Tract Nos. 13565-5 through -9, located on the north side of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road, are required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions, the Developer Ts required to have the protect annexed into the appropriate Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts. The Consent and Nalver to Annexation forms have been received fray the Developer and are on file in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the resolution requiring adoption by the City Council to complete the proposed annexations. Respectful submi~tt/ed,/~~ L' 1 ~~~ _ " 'd1111am J 'Nell City Engineer NJO:NY:dlw 57 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 i TiPACT /~T6u~ rT~CT /9365-7 0 i CITY O~ RANCHO CtICAMONGA COYNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OR CALIFORNIA r /ds65 4~'E.PALL /NOEXNJ.6D° 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING IYIAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO$. 1 ANO 7 LECd~'NQ ~ MrD/SIN m COMM!!N/T>'EOUfSTEFIN T?A/LS j C/TY M.l/NfA/NEO AA'EiIS ST.rCCT 131Z~G 87REL!T' G/GNl Od.4NT/Ty HioC/CNDA GT ! CrPESTL/.v~ PL. 5 SAN 6AB~P/EL' CT, / C1TY 0! ltANCMO Ct1CAMONOA COtNiTY OR iAN ttltNAROg10T~/ g STATt O~ CALIROANIA ~~ exnieir •~• As8tSSMENT D1/WRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LKiNTINti MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 GEOENO V.~A MEO/~IN tQ CPMMUN/T!'dOUC3Ti~dIiY r~l'A/L8 ~ G/TY M.I/N7A/NED AREAS ~ STTCtT TP~G STREET G/GHT QU•4N7/TY CLAREMONT GN. 2 ANN~9NDALE LN. ~ ~P//XoE'L/NE PL 2 I CITY OR l1ANCM0 CYCAMONOA ~ CQUNTY O~ tAN ttl1NMOIN T f ~..~~ ., ~. ~ lTATt OR CALIROllN1A .~~ ex~roi •~. A88E88MENT DIARiRAM ~ANDSCApE INAMITENANCE D18TRICT NO. 7 C01~NTY OR !AN ~l1NAl101N0 STATt OR CALIROIINIA ~/ -~ STREET LIGHTq~Ki MAklTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 I ASSESSMENT DI/1NRAM LAN08CAPE NIAMiTENANCE DI8Ti11CT NO. 7 STREET LIGMTp1(; MAINTENANCE D18TgICT N08. 1 ANO 7 b CITY OR l1ANCMO CtICAMONOA COtNrTY OR !AN ~lINAlIpM10 r,~~a~s 5 iTATt OR CALIROlINIA CUSTOMER'S CCpY Sc~~N]~ ~/ ~ ~~ _ ~_ s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S ~`~~ ~ ~%~ Post Office Box 807 <-^"J 9320-C Base Line Road 6~ ~ `l~~ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ~~~: r ~.~ (714) 989-1851 - eC¢INetl From- are ,AOpress / (f' A.C NO OESLPIP90N AMOVHi :~]~5:.]JW 1 Oi:'IER LICENSES AHO PERMITS 1.1]?33]SV eU1lLING PEPMIiS I,ASb~6N INiERESi 1.]JS1.5:0 vRIniEG AIAiER1Al , 'i :]~d55N?t0 PfCPEII,ON FEES ,I J]]li]0u I P4NNING FEES i]0ll?l90 fN " ~ c` 1 .I A< U bLSbi]W BV ixE494CEN5E5 I ]:b0910 GASrv OVENSMOPi •JJ)]Ji60 P4nCrv EC1( 1~3yJ.]]E0 PLANCNEGV- Recmpr NumOer TOTAL 2~s / r(~}~ 28469 e,`~• i c 68 Iwo+Ewr I~ Ew e..~roE~e~rEw• RESOLUTION N0. 9~' ~~~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DECOKES BRONNE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE EDITH E. BRONNE TRUST NHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 85-84 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Delores Browne, Successor Trustee of the Edith E. Broome Trust and NHEREAS, said Real Preperty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on Mdy 3, 1985, as Document No. 85-105338 and NHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and L1en Agreement 15 no longer requl red. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement and that the C1ty Clerk shell cause Release of Lten to De recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 18, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City C_oC~jYcil ,(w~L~~ FROM: Councilmembers William Alexander and Diane William~'ae the Subcommittee to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation BY: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AOABBMSAT BBTIfBEN THS CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONOA AHD THB RANCHO COCANONOA CONNUNITY FOONDATZON Attached is an agreement which Was prepared by the City Attorneys office at the request of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and the City Council Subcommittee. The agreement was modeled after the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. The agreement accounts for the use of staff time by the Foundation in exchange for services rendered by the Foundation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The intent of the agreement is to more clearly and formally define the relationship between the Foundation and the city. The Foundation formally approved the agreement at its July 20, 1993, meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I A6REENSDiT YOR BRRVZCEB This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation formed and operating pursuant to the laws of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as the ^City^) and THE RANCNO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit public benefit Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ^Foundation"). a=xaa8aaxs A. Recitals. (i) City is presently providing to its residents, principally by and through the vee of its general funds, cultural and recreational opportunities and services. (ii) In recognition of the need and desirability of expanding cultural and recreational programs to the citizens of the City oP Rancho Cucamonga and the consideration oP the difficulties posed the public entity to provide the time and effort needed to be devoted to such expansion, the Foundation was formed in April of 1987 to lessen the 6urdena of government and to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii) The Foundation, to facilitate its principal goal, has undertaken those objeativee and activities including, but not limited to, the following: 1 I!, AaR88MBNT FOR BBAVICBB This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation formed and operating pursuant to the laws of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit public benefit Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Foundation"). IIITffiIIflIIIITffi A. Raoitela. (i) City is presently providing io its residents, principally by and through the use of Ste general funds, cultural and recreational opportunities and servlcea. (ii) In recognition of the need and desirability of expanding cultural and recreational programs to the citizens of ~ the city of Rancho Cucamonga and the consideration oP the difficulties posed the public entity to provide the time and effort needed to be devoted to such expansion, the Foundation was formed in April oP 1987 to lessen the burdens of government and to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii) The Foundation, to facilitate its principal goal, has undertaken those objectives and activities including, but not limited to, the following: 1