Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993/06/02 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 2, 1993 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Cantor Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •~x City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J, Buquet, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember #~• ,Jack Lam, Ciry Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 April 21. 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CR'Y COIJNCIL MWU'fES HiWIaLMf611Bg A regular meeting of dre Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, Apnl 21, 1993, in the Council Chambers at OIe Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Crnkr Drive, Rancho Cucamm~ga, California. 77te meeting was convened at 7:05 p.m. during the Redevebpntent Agency meeting, recessed at 7:06 p.m., mM reconvened at 7: t6 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout Present were Boardmembers: William 1. Akzander, Rex Gutiurez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout Also present were: Lack [.am, Cily Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Rick Gomez, Community Development D.rector, Olen Jones. Sr. RDA Analyst; Brad Bullu, City Planner, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Jce O'Neil, City Engineer; Sttzatme Ota, Community Services Martagtr, Dave Moore, Rureation Supervisor; Bob Dominguez, Admmistrafive Services Director, Duane Baku, Assistant m the City Manager; Diane O'NCaI, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management AnalyR I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra 1. Adams. Ciry Clerk. Absent was Boardmember. Charles 1. Buquct II ....a• B. ANNOONCpMENTS/PRF.SF.NTATION$ B I. Presenmlion ut Proclamation recognizing the first week of Maya "Blue Ribbon Week." Mayu Stout presented Ne proclamation m Capt. Brace Zeinu of the Rancho Cucamonga Pollee Depannlent. B2. Presentadon of Proclamation m the City o(Rancho Cucamonga 8 m 9 yearoW Girls All-SIN Bakctball Team for Winning the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation Champbnship. Mayor Smut presented the proclamation m Cynthia Tumu, and presented certificates m dle team members. •~r~r• No communications were made from the public. •+~~~r City Council Minutes Apd121, 1993 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR D2. Approval of Minues: March 24, 1993 D3. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 324N3, 3/31/93, and 4/lN3; and Payroll ending 3/LSry3 For the total amount of 51.726,594.64. D4. Approval to receive and file cturent Investment Schedule az of March 31, 1993. D5. Approval of the Community Services Department Revised Scholarship Policy as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. D6. Approval to exknd Comcast Cable T.V.'s Franchise. RESOLUTION N0.91-012L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D1. Approval b destroy rccads and documents which arc no longer nxryhed az povided order Government Code Secdon 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 93-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTTON OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCl1MENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 DR. Approval to adopt a resolution to enter into a Icase/purchase agreement with Municipal Services Group, Incorpsatesl. RESOLUTION N0.93-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEASE/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMF,NT THROUGH MUNICIPAL SERVICES GROUP. INCORPORATED D9. Approval of a loan aansaction with the Ratrcho Curamonga Redevekryment Agency. D10. Approval of Dcclaradon o(Roadway Easement for APN 1062-071-08, 5702 Amethyst Avenue, the former sight of the Ledig House. D11. Approval b Release a Real Properly Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (or Street Improvements and Acceptance of Real Property Improrovemenl Contract and Lien Agreement for O(f-Site Improvements on Almond Street submitted by Randolph Scot Davis and Sandra Pauline Davis. ITEM RF.MOVF,D FOR DISCUSSION BY COIINCILMF,MBF,R WILLIAMS. Oily Council Minu[es April 2!, 1993 Page 3 RESOLUTION N0.93-OR3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAMS AND SANDRA PA[JLBYE DAMS RESOLUTION N0.93-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAMS AND SANDRA PAULINE DAMS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME DI2. Approval of the Engineers Reptxt for the refunding of Assessment District 85-PD. RESOLUTION N0.93.085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REFUNDING AND REASSESSMENT REPORT OF ENGINEER AND CONFIRMING REASSESSMENTS FOR REFUNDING BONDS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT D13. Approval n(a Resoludon making award for sa!r, of refunding bonds. RESOLUTION NO. 93-OR6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITI' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF REFUNDNG BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND D14. Approval of Letter Agreement (CO 93-02R) berwcen the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club which provides for a temporary parking lot for patrons of the Quakes baseball games. D15. Approval m award and authnrixadon m execute Contract (C093-029) for Milliken Avenue Bike Route and Basc Line Road Bikc Lanc Phase 1 Improvement Proja4 for the amount of $I7,2(p.00 ($15,637.00 plus 10X; contingency), w be funde4 from Adminisuative Air Quality Impmvemenl Gmnt Fund, Account NO. 14-0158.6028. DI6. Approval m award and authnriratlon to execute Contract (CO 93-030) for consWCtion of Seventh Suee: Impmvemen~s, bctwcen Haven Avenue and Center Avenue ul C.P. Conswction Compam, Incorporated, for the amount of 5167,750.00 ($152,SW.Ofl plus IOr& contingency), to be funded fmm Fund 9 Gas Taz Acwunl Number 09-0637A223 and Fund R3. Asse<sment Distict R2-IR, Account Number R3-0637-602A. DI7. Approval to ezecule Improvement Agreement, Improvement Secuntics and Monumentadon Cash Deposit for Tract 13280, IacateA north of Basc Linc Road between Milliken and Rochester Avenues, submitted by PGI No. 3A and Release of pmviously submitted Improvement Agrcement, Improvement Securities and Monumentatlon Cash Deposit aaepted by Cily Council nn November 15, 1989 and July I8, 1990 respectively, from The Lusk Company. City Council Minutes April 2l, 1993 Pge 4 RESOLUTION N0.93-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13280 AND RELEASING THE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONIJMENTATTON CASH DEPOSIT Dl R. Approval to execute lmpmvemenl Agreement Extension for Tract 14121, located on t he southwest coma of Highland Avcnuc and Milliken Avenue, submitted by 1.P. Rtgades Devebpment RESOLUTON N0.93-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 DI9. Approval m execute Impmvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14486, located on the north side of Artow Route betwcen Archibald Avenue aM Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Cedar Villas. RESOLUTION N0.93-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 144R6 D20. Approval of Preliminary Report and Selling Public Hearings of May 19, 1993 and )une 16, 1993, m levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Report (or Park and Recmation Improvement District (PD-R6). RESOLUTION N0.93-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFIE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTTON TO LEVY ANb COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATTON IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-RS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993N4 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LiGHTMG ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBIECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION N0.93.091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) D21. Approval of Preliminary Enginwr's Reports and Scuing Public Ilcarings !or May 19, 1993 and June 16, 1993, to Icvy the annual assessments and approve Ilse Engineer's Reports for Stmet Lighting Maintenance District Nos. L 2, 3, 4, 5, h, 7, and R. City Council Minutrs April 21, 1993 Page 5 RESOLUTION N0.93-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CtTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACI' OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBRiCT1ONS THERETO RESOLUTION N0.93-(193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND R D22. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public Hearings for May 19, 1993 arM June 16, 1993, to lery the annual assessmenes and approve the Engineer's Reports for Larduspe Maimerance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A. 3B. 4, 5, 6, 7 arM R. RESOLUTION N0.93-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICFS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993N4 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING :,CT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION N0.93-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROYAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 4, 7 AND R MOTION: Moved Fry P.lezander, seconded by Gutierrez b approve the staff recommendations contained in the staff reports of the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items DS Arid Dl 1, Mmion cartied unanimously 4-0-I (Buquet absenp. ...... DISCUSSION OF ITF,M D5. Approval of the Community Services Department Revised ScAMarship PMicy as rernmmended by the Park and Recreation Commission. Maym Stout tell this was a worthwhile program but suggested that them be some small stipend involved instead of it just being given to them, because he felt if a person has to work for something, it would be more valuable to them. Suzanne Om, Community Services Manager, explained how the sclalarship program works based on income levels Mayor Slow sutcd he diJ na think tiro entiro thing should be (rec. City Council Minuses April 21, 1993 Page 6 Councilmembec W illiams slated she would go along with that. Counctlmember Guderrez stated he (elt a family should pay a portion of the cost. lack Lam, City Manager, smted this suggestion would be developed arM brought back az the next nketing. MOTION: Moved by Smut, secorMed by Alexander to contlnue Item DS m the May 5, 1993 meeting. Motor caried unanimously, 4-41 (BUquet absent). •rrrr• DISCUSSION OF ITEM Dll. ADDrOVaI to Release a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Street Improvements and Acceptance of Real Property tmprovemeol Contract and Lien Agreement for Off-Site Improvements on Almond Street, submitted by Randolph Scot Davis and Sandra Pauline Davis. Councilmember W illiams asked it mil was being done instead of or in addition m. Joc O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this agreement is a aubsdtuse agreement m the previous one and also includes everything drat was in the previous agreement and adds m iL Councilmember Williams wanted m rtmke sort this does trot do anyNing m dse vai's m We alignment. Ice O'Neil, City Engineer stated no, dot this is much more than the original agreement. RESOLUTION N0.93-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNL4, RELEASING REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAMS AND SANDRA PAl1LINE DAMS RESOLUTION N0.934184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAMS AND SANDRA PAULINE DAMS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Stout m approve Resolution Nos. 93-083 and 93-084. Motion carried unanimously,4-0-i (Buquet absrnQ. rrrrrr E CONSENT ORDINANCF_C No items were submitted. .rrrr• City Council Minutes Apri121, 1993 Page 7 F1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL pC E SMENT AND D V~ OPM~N° RFC W 9 0 K & K FIN Pl - An appeal of a Condition of Approval imposed by dte Planning Commission rrxluving a storm drain in conjunction with a request to construct a golf vaining facility, conssting of a driving range, putting green, chipping area, clubhouse, arM maintenance building, in the General Indusnial Designation (Subarea ft) of the IrMustrial Area Specific Plan, bated on the rwrth side of Arrow Route, east o(Milliken Avenue - AI'N: 229-011- 24. Smf(rcport presented by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. Maya Stout askeA i(this would be subject m drainage fees. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, stated yes because it was mt within any particular assessment district Councilmember Williams asked what would be the cost of the drainage tee per acre. Ioe O'NCiI, City Engineer, stated the drainage fee would be 55,000.(q per acre, and that there were 25 acres for this Project, so the cost woWd be $125,000.00. Councilmember Alexander asked if under the design submitted, would this project generate runoff that would be expected to be hazardous or world it 6c retained on the site. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, stated that the spillway and berm drat has been created riwth of Arrow serves as a detention facility. He stated if the storm drain is not installed, there will still have m be some type of detention facility on site. Ceuncilmembcr Gutiertez asked what is the sense of an interim use on a site if a party is leasing only m move out after having made the improvements. Scat Murphy, Associate Planner, stated that originally staff had recommended full improvements, but that staff Inter determined that only the physical improvements immediately adjacent m the property, which would be 900 feet of frontage, be made. The balance of it would be through oBers of dedication. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Bill Kauffman on Hillside Road, staled he would be leasing part of this property and azked that they be allowed some relie(on she sbrm drain (aciliry because it is a short term ase. He azkrd that the basin Chet now exists be allowed to be reconstructed so That they can afford the City Ne same protection it now has and not be requled to put a storm drain in which would never mceive wales He stated may would gladly improve Arrow Highway which would include curbs and gutters, complem landscaping, sidewalks, etc. Cnuncilmember Williams asked what would lx the total cost of the smrm dmin. Mr. Kauffman stated he was told it would be betwcen $$O(l,IX)U.00 and Sti00,0f10.00. Councilmember W illiams asked what the Cily determined to he the cost Joc O'Neil, City Engineeq stated probably about $350,0(IO.W, Mr. Kauffman stated he was trot aware of the $125,OIIO.IXJ storm dmin fee until tonight. Them being nn further msponse, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes Apri121, 1993 Paae 8 Councilmemher Alezandu stated he did trot think We storm drain rieedcd to be put in right rrow and felt Ne City should enrnrmege NLc project. Mayor Stout felt az kmg as appropriate drainage fees are paid, he felt Nis would be adegruk and did not think Nc storm drain needed to go in at Nis time. Councilmember Gutierrez sated he felt Nis project would be a plus for the City. RESOLUTION N0.93.096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-05, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GOLF TRAINING FACILTCY, CONSISTING OF A DRNRvG RANGE, PUTTMG GREEN, CHIPPMG AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUB-DING, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUBTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS Pr SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-24 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to grant the appeal and adopt the SghStltYtt Resolution No. 93-(196. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0.1 (Baguet absent). •~~~~r GI. ONSC_ I~RATION TO AMEND CHAPTER 30R OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALL DIS .R'TION RY pppROVA . BY AP (CANTS Staff report presented by Bob Dominguez, AdminisuaGve Services Dirccmr. Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, read Ne title of (hdinance No. 51 i. Mayne Stout opaned the meeting for public hearing. There being no rusponse, Ilre public hearing was closed. ORDNANCE NO.511 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF 7'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.OR.0900F THE P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 3.08.090 (G) PERTAINING TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL BY AN APPLICANT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander b waive full reading and set second reading of Ontirance No. 51 I for May 5, 1993. Modon carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Baguet absenQ. w ~.~.. No ikms were submitted. City Council Minutes Apri121, t993 Page 9 «~~... L COUNCIL RIISINRSS 11. UPDATE IZ_Pl'ORT FROM THE DAY LA_RORER SUBCOMMITTEE Counegmember Alexander stated ttwje are presendy day laborers looking for work that are on Rancho Curamonga's streets. He stated Rancho Cucamonga has asked (or help from surrounding cities a assist with Nis problem. He felt an area should be designated for the day laborers where they can go for work. He scored this is someNing the City has been sntdying for many years, and that i(something is developed, it does nor mean it has m be a permanent situadon. Staff repott presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmembcr Alexander added the City is already spending mom:y on law enforcement m correct problems pcnaining m this. Cou%ilmembef Williams asked what the 530,(IOO.IXI arraunt world include for the temporary struchue. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated a part time person, utility costs, etc. Maya Stout asked i(almmam sites like the irdusuial area have been researched. Duane Baker, Assismnt m dte City Manager, stated they have been resemched, and for various r~sons they did rKK find anything appropriate. Councilmember Gutierrc~ stated he likes this proposed laration. He felt it would be closer m the people that would be ucinH it. Mayor Stout asked if some Type of census was taken on Arrow. Duane Baker, Assistant a the City Manager, scored yes and Nat the numbs of day laborers seem to be aMut the same as last year raw that the warmer weather is coming. Mayor Stout opened the meeting (or public comments. Addressing the City Council wem: Gary Thompson, RRI7 Svang [one, scored he is rued of seeing people roam the City streets and doing things They should not 6c doing. He scored he has complained m everyone possible m get These people off Ne streets. He scored if a shelter is going m Ire built, he wanted some assurance that these people wtll not hams his family any more. Councilmembor Alexander stated he felt laws could be enforced if these people had some place m go a Ionk for work. Mayor Smut mW about rho new law dot was passed several years ago that police officers could rat assist Ne INS Councilmemher Guticrtez stated the solution m This problem is a mmpomry trailer for dte day laborers m go to. Mayor Smut operad the mceting (or publk: hearing. Addressing da City Council wem: City Council Minutes April 2l, 1993 Page ]0 AI Garcia, Ontario, stated he has been aware of this problem for a long time. He sealed of all of Ihese people he has had contact with, he has not come in contact with any criminal clement. He offered his services ro the City, that he would teach them mnstrucdon and Americanism. He felt if something like this is developed, he could guarantee that these people would not harass his family. Chris Downs, 9089 Robards, stated he has been on the Day Ialnrer Task Force and that he is against the center. He commented on other titles that have job centers and Nm they have become magnets. He stated he did not want his lax money N go N this type of a center. He wanted the Council N vote no on this matter. Phil Store, Onmrio, felt the illegal immigrants needed N leave. He stated they do not want a center in Ontario. He also worried that them would bn injuries i(e pursuit took place through Ontario if the center is approved for this site. He felt Rancho Cucamonga should take Ne money for the site Arid put it towards law enforcement. He asked that the Council not put the center whero it is being prolwsed. Carlos Fisco, 6417 Vineyard, felt everyone needed ro work together on Nis. He had pictures for the Council ro sec of other cities that have job centers. He felt Rancho Cucamonga needed Nis now. He felt them waz no assurance that Nis world be a success, but felt the City needed ro take the chance. Gene Hernandez, 1238 Raymond, Ontario, xmted he felt Nese people were of Ne criminal element. He (elf the center would atuacl people m loiter. Jeff Neman, 1237 Alvarado, did not Nink dMSe people should ce allowed ro do conswction work and not be licensed/union workers. Grorgc Anal, 1737 Amador, Onario, salted he opposed the center az proposed Betty Jackson, 1426 Highland, did rmt fcel dte Council should pardcipam in any matters ro help Ne day latrorers and that NeY would then leave the City. Dnn Smith, 185A N. Glenn, Onmrio, did not agree Nal Ne center should be put in and did not Nink it would help Ne situation, Aubrey Campbell congratulated Councilmembers Alexander and Gu6enez for Ne work they have done on Nis. He stated Nat something needed to be done wiN Nis situation. Bev Strong, 8242 Tapia Via, kit Ne money should go ro something odax Nan Nis job site. Don Anderson, 8887 Applewond, stated he was tired of seeing everything Nat is going on around Nis area. He fell Ne program should be given a chance N see whore it goes. He tell surrounding cities should hdp out Rancho Cucamonga wiN Wis situation. Mike Winkler, 1840 Calaveras, styled he is not in favor o(Nis project and felt it would increase crime and decrease his property value, Albert Cruz, 1750 Modem. Ontario, pointed out infortnadon that he had received from the staff about the proposed project. He felt Ne Council Arid Task Force should notlfy We residents when [hey are going to mcet and discuss this. He slated he would like to ce naified of any public hearings or meetings on Nis matter. He felt Nc Council should look at Nis before making a decision. City Council Minulu April 2l, 1993 Page 11 Vema Fscamie, 8837 Gmvc, asked that the City Council reconsider this proposal. Edith Copciand, 8471 Autumn Hill Place, asked that something be done m help this problem. She felt everyone should work together and do something. )ce 5anzina, Alvarado Street, Ontario, tell Rancho Cucamonga would be getting rid of the problem and giving it m Ontario if the job center went through as proposed, and staled he did not agree with the ProGnsed Plan. Dee Murray, lives in mobile home park next m IaMr camp, felt the City should look arorurd for another location, but did feel the laborer's neeried assismnce. Don Niksonsonic felt there should be union workers and nrx just somcmre off the street. Bill Morrison, 1846 Calaveras, Ontario, felt the residrnts should have a say in this decision for Nis m be moved to another City. Mike Devcs, 1854 N. Glenn, did not want to see anyone get hurt from the day laborers. Bev Barker, 1831 Parksidc, did not fceI This shoum be in a residential area, but should go in an industrial area. Chuck Bolin, 1224 Raymond, (elf this center should be put in nice surroundings incase sorething did not work out it could be used for someming else. He tell this center would create a lot of trash and did na think it should be close m IF.c railroad tracks. He did not disagree with the concept, just the location proposed. Fran Tisserick, 2513 Euclid Crest, Upland, commented on MS agrnls. Julia Lopez, 1 ft 191'arkside, did not mink the daycamp at Nis location would solve anything. She did na think the people living in this area would be sale in their homes if the daycamp goes in at dre proposed location. She felt it should go in a commercial or industrial area, not residential. r~r~~• Mayor Stout called a recess al 9:47 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 10:02 p.m. wiN all Councilmembers present azcept Councilmrnrber Buquet who was absent. •~~~~• Tracy Krouse, 8351 Chatfey SL, stated she did rrot agree wish the proposed site and did raft think it should be put in a residential area. She felt the sunounding cities need m work with Rancho Cucamonga. Jack Nigmll, Rth and Gmvc, felt the Coursed should reconsider the location for the center. Ray Stuchnnann. 12440 Lily Coun, commented on a Landscape West that told him They am using illegal aliens on their work crews. He fell companies should smp hiring these illegal immigmn6. Norman Camello, Arrow and Grove Market, (clt the Council should look for ermlher sik. Mayor Smut asked him if he would cooperam if there was a higher level of enforcement made for loitering. Mr. Camello stated yes. City Council Minutes Apri121, 1993 Page 12 Mr. Thompson reiterated his pmvious romments that They did not want this project m go Nrough AI Garcia staled the people objecting m this are frwn Ontado. He felt all Ne Ontario msidents should go m (heir City Council m help find a location fa Nis. There being no further response, public testimony was closed. Mayor Stout felt Rancho Cucamonga's Ordinatrcc heeded m be explained regarding enforcement fm These types of situations. He slated he does rrW like the job center idea i(the workers artd employers are not following all the laws. He stated he dots trot like dte SduGrove location. He felt it should be in an industrial area within walking distance m the residential areas. He felt another location should be checked into that is not in a rexidrntial area no matter what City it is in. Councilmember Alexander stated he ti not particularly happy with the proposed location and fell outer neighboring cities should work with Rancho Cucamonga. He stated he would like an industrial area for dte kcation also. He did not feel the City should concrnuate on the rnforcemrnt issue alone. Councilmember Williams felt anmlrer krcation should be looked at also. She told the residents of Ontario m tell their City Council Nat they should participate with Ratrcho Cucamonga. She fell the neighboring cities should get involvrA. Councilmembcr Gutierrez slated he is willing m Zook at another site. He stated it bothers him that odter Councils were not getting involved in Nis, and asked Ne Ontario residents to talk m their City Council, Mayor Smut suggested thaz stat(be directed m explore an alternate site, industrial in naaue, which would minimize impact on any residential area, the City Attorney work on a comprehensive Ordinance to deal wiN Ne issue consistent wiN what other cities have done, and an acdon plan be developed by law enforcement in conjunction wiN City staff, on an action plan for higher levels of enforcement. He stated Ontario can maybe help with Ne enlacement idea. lack lam, City Manager, added That in looking for an almmam site that budgetary constraints also be considered. Mayor Smut fell Nat a lease idea acing CDBG ftmds be locked at which would he cheaper Nan a capital expenditure. ACTION: The Council wncurred wiN Mayor Smut's suggestion. r~~•~• I2, pISC IySC~ON OF TF~ ITY'k CONTIM 1 D PART( IPATION IN A , IF OF 1 IFO MA CITIES AND NATIONAL LEAC•UE OF CITIF,S OROANt7_pTIONS Staff relwrt presented by Lack Lam, Ciry Manager. Councilmember Alexander stated Nat in trips m Sacmmrnto recently, he had been hearing from legislalas Nat the Isague is trot representing the cities as it should, He asked Nor the I.cague report m Ne City Council as to what utay ao. Susan Mickey, Management Analyst 1, added that the I.caguc has nf(ercd m do Nis. Mayor Smut suggectcd Nu! fwo Cily Councilmembers meet wiN league repmsenlatives for Nis City Council Minutes Apri121, 1993 Page 13 Councilmember Williams stated she was geeing mined messages between the League and the City's legislators. She agreed that the Council mat with the league representatives arM slut if they have one good idea, it would be woM the money spent on ow membership. Mayor Smut stated M; dots tta krmw what the National league of Cilics does aM felt they should be deleted trom the budget for Fiscal Year 1993/94, ACTION: Councilmember Alexander and Mayor Smut agreed m mat with League representatives and m Belem the National League of Cities from next year s budget. •r~~~~ No imms were identified for the nczt meeting. •~.~.• K L RFOLmST BY CLACCIC CAB COMPANY TO D(c rec N RCFA"'IV OF TAXI ORDINANr'F Cuig 2'avel, Operations Manager for Classic Cab Company, presented information m the Cily Council ac was in his Ietmr of April 19, 1993. He stated dcere are companies that are operating without the appropriam lianscs/pcrmils. He mentioned that Yclbw Cab had otaaincd a business permit, but But no driver hes a permit to drive in Rancho Cucamonga. He felt any company that obtains a business permit to be retroactive to when me business was started for each year. He stated the main reason he was present was bccausc of the drivers. He stated they hate to sa some drivers na abiding by dm laws whet his drivers are following the City ordinances. He stated they would like m know how this Ordinance can be enforced. Brian Hunt, 9972 Langston, did not agra with Classic Cab's comments and felt they were also rmt complying with all the City's regulations, He did na fcel this Ordinance was any betmr dun San Bernardino County's fhdinana. He smted the Ordinance was costing his company money, He asked that the Ordinance be reconsidered at a (wort dale and felt the cab companies should have more input inm the Ordinance. Robert Brady, owner of Classic Cab, smted that the Yellow Cab drivers aro required m pay for their own permit fees. Mayor Smul sumd at the time this wac approved, it was done on a vial basis. He felt if the City has an Ordinatme that it should be enforced. He smted after a period o(time it is Found This is rnH working, it can be changed. Duane Baker, Assisunt to the City Manager, staled this is due m come back to the Council (or review at Ne end of the Year. lack Lam, City Manager, and Duane Baker added that Yellow Cab is abempting to wmply, That it is the drivers Nat arc not in compliance. Councilmember Akzatrder stated he would like a breakdown of exactly how the City comes up with the individual licensing cosks with topics m the rost of the Council. City Council Mimnu April 21, 1993 Page 14 r++r.• MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander b adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss personnel maters and litigation, Rancho Cucmnonga V Peterson. Motion cartied utunimmrsly, 4-0-1 (BUgcet absent). The meeting adjatmed at 11:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra 1. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: May 5, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A regular meeting of the Raceho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 5, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Cenkr, located at IOSIXI Civic Cenkr Drive, Rancho Cucamm~ga, California. The meeting was callyd m oMer at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William 1. Alexander, Charles 1. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diara: Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also presem were; lack Lam, City Manager, Andrew Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney; Rick Gomez, Community iJevelopmwt Director, Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager, Brad Buller, City %anner Shinto Bose, Deputy City Enginwr; Mike Olivier, Sr, Civil FngirMer, Monte Preacher, Public Works Engincer, Suvartne Ota, Community Services Manager, Duane Baker, Assistant m Ne City Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk: Donna Kendrena, Secretary; Shirr'1 Criffen, Records Clerk; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Brace Zeiner, Aencho Cucamonga Police Department; grid Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk. •rra~• B1. Presenution of Proclamation Rceognizing the Week of May 2 through May B az Munkipal Clerks' Week. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation m Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, and her soft. r~~~.. C COMMI1NIf'ATIONS FROM TH F. PIINLIC C I. Mr. Lansdale, h153 Sapphire, commented on the man Nat had was burned several weeks ago while doing concrete sawing. He asked if Ibis man was a licensed contractor through the City and State. He felt safety was very impormnl and felt precautions should be mken. Mayor Smut suggested that an informational memo be sent to the Council on this and that Ma Lansdale also be given Nis same information. Councilmember Buquet soled that Cal Osha is cumendy investigating this and that it is under thcirjurisdiction. Mr. Lansdale staled his concern is the safmy of any person working for him. City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 2 C2. Mayor Smut stated he had orte other comment that should have been made under anrmurtcements, so he would like to make the comment now. He reported dte accident involving one of the City's fire trucks and a drunk driver. He announced that all three fue fighmrs wem releauA from the hospital, and arc on their way m recovery. r~~~r• Mayor Stout sated IRm Fl should be moved to the Consent Calendar arM also removed for discussion az the request of JOAnn Willis. Rick Gomea„ Community Development Director, announced that Item D24 should also 6e removed from the agenda. DI. Approval of Minutes: April 7, 1993 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos, 4l14ry3 arM 4/11ry3; and Payroll ending 4/Rry3 for the total amount of $1,005,024.75. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Nodce Inviting Bids" for the insmllation of Touch Pad Systems at Red Hill Community and Heritage Community Parks, Red Hill Community Park is located az the southwest wmer of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue and Heritage Community Park is located at the southwest comer of Hillside RoaA and Beryl Street, W be funded from PD-R$ Fund, Account No. 90-0637-9222. RESOLUTION N0.93A97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IA7STALLATION OF TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARKS. RED HR-L COMMUNITY PARK IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINF. ROAD AND VINEYARD AVBNUE AND HERTTAGE COMMUNITY PARK IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND BERYL STREET IN SAID CfIY AND AUTHORZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of Ne "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Resurfacing of the Equesmian Rink at Heritage Community Park, located at dte southwest comer of Hillside Rand and Beryl Street, m be funded from PD-RS Fund, Account No. 90-4637-9221. RESOLlTION NO, 93-09A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE RESURFACING OF THE EQUESTRIAN RINK AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND BERYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTTNG THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval of the Community Services Doparlment Revised Scholarship Policy with changes as recommended by the City Council at their April 21, 1993 meeting. (Cnminued hom April 2l, 1993) City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 3 D6. APPmval of request ro host Thcmpcudc Egtcestrian Horse Show N April,1994. D7. Approval of dte Sport Field Light Use Billing Process. D8. Approval to set annual special Ux for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). RESOLUTION N0.93-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILTTIFS DISTRICT 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) D9. Approval m set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drairage and Law Enforcement), RESOLUTION N0.93-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 86-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) D10. Approval of a Resolution establishing an annual levy wiNin the Alta [-oma ChennU District (84-2), the Sixty Street Industrial Park Refund District (82-IR), the Ranch Cucamonga Dmirmge District (862) aM MilEken south of Anow bistrict (89-1). RESOLUTION N0.93-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCIiRRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOIIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DI I. Approval to Release Real Property Improvement Convect and Lien Agreement for APN 207-211-01, located between Artow Rouse and foothill Boulevard on the west side of Cucamonga Channel, submitted by R & K Homes. RESOLUTION N0.93-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM R & K HOMES, INCORPORATED b12. Approval m Release Real Pmperty Improvemen4 Contract erd Lien Agreement mleasing Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 8583, kmated trlt the nonheasl comer of Hellman Avenue and Ninth Suce6 sobmilted by Russell D. Jctcr. City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 4 RESOLUTION N0.93-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RUSSELL D. ]ETER D13. Approval to award and authorization to execute conuact (CO 93-031) For Naven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, far dte amount of 5343,772.17 (5312,520.15 plus 10% cendngency), m Silvia Canumetion m 6e turaied Gan Fug 32, Local and AAerial Measure I, Account No. 32-4637- 9112 and Fund 24, FAU, Aocount No. 24-4637-9112. DI4. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement fa Undergounding of Overhead Ulilides fm Parcel Map ] 2959-1, kxahA ont he south side of Arrow Rouen from White Oak Avenue to eau of dre AT & SF Spur, submittal by Capellino and Associates, URA-016. RESOLUTION N0.93-104 A RESOLUTION OF TI{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE l1NDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTR.ITIES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE FROM WHffE OAK AVENUE TO EAST OF THE AT & SF SPUR D15. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection with dw development of Tract No. 14866, located in Lemon Avenue from I-ondai Avenue east to the Alta Loma Channel, submitted by the Pennhill Company. RESOLUTION N0.93-105 A RF.5OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMDURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTTON OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAM FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 14866 DI6. Approval to execute Improvement Agmmnent Extension for Tract 13303 Ixated on the southeast comer of Mountain Vicw Drive and Tcrta Vista Parkway, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION N0.93-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACE 13303 D17. Approval to accept Community Trail ImprovemenLS for lire Community Trail located W the noM of Mojave Road and Realer Soecr City Council Minuses May 5, 1993 Page 5 DIR. Approval m Release Mainterlence Guarantee Bond for Milliken Median and Gateway Project, tb 90-003. located from Fovnh Street to Sixth Street. Release: Mainterance Guaranee Bond $ 413,895.13 D19. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantce Bond for Base Line Swrm Dmin and Traffic Signal, CO 90. fpR, bcatcd from Vicmria Park Lane to l-IS Freeway. Release: Mainteriarice Guarantee Bond 51,473,405.50 D20. Approval m Release Mainterence Guarantee Bond for Rochestef Avenue Parkway Improvement Project, Cb 90-050, located on Rochester south of Clservil, Release: Maintuwice Guarentce Bond S 315,346.50 D21. Approval to Release Maintcrrarce Guarantee Bond (or Hale Line and Aochesler Traffic Sigrel, CO 90-074. Release: Mainterwrce Guarantee Bond S 109,878.06 D22. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Foothill and Rochester Traffic Signal and Sueel Improvements, CO 9L001. Release: Mainterance Guarantee Bond 5374,467.01 D23. Approval w Relrasc Mainlenarrce Guarantee Bond for Manse Viso Sued Improvements, CO 91-006. Release: Mainlcnanrc Guarantee Bond $ 32,851.60 ITEM REMOVF,D FROM 25, Approval of landmark Designation 93-05 -Gil Rodriguez, Jr. - A proposal to designate as a local landmark the John Klusman House, a Potential Local Landmark, State Landmark and potentially eligible for the Natbnal Register, located at RR41 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga - APN: 207-211-13. City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 6 RESOLUTION N0.93-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-05, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE JOHN KLUSMAN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6841 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 207-211-13 MOTION: Moved by Bugttq, seconded by Alexander to approve all slat( recommendations contained in the slat( reports of the Consent Calrndar with the exception of Items D24 and Item D25. urrr• DISCUSSION OF ITEM D25. Approval of Landmark Designatan 93.05 -Gil Rodriguez, Jr. - A proposal to designate as a local landmark the Joho Klusman House, a Potrotial Local Landmark, State Landmark and potentially eligible for the National Register, located at 8841 Foothill Boulevard, Rancbo Cucamonga -APN: 207-211.13. JoAnn Willis, Boardmgnber (or California Historic Route 66 Associatan, read a letter in support of dte designation which a on fik in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION N0.93-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-05, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE JOHN KLUSMAN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 8841 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 207-211-13 MOTION: Moved 6y Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 93-108. Minion carried unanimously, 5-0. *rrrrr Item H1 was considemd at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order. Miirir El. CONCIDERATION TO AMEND CHAPTER '+OS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALL DI .R TIONARY APPROVAL BY APP I - NTq Della 1. Adams, City Clerk, read the tide o(Ordinance No. 511. ORDINANCE NO.511 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCf10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.08.090 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 3.(18.090 (G) PERTAINING TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL BY AN APPLICANT City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 7 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, sewnded by Cufiertez m waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 51 L Maim rartird uranimously, 5-0. rrrrrr ITEM WAS MOVED TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS ITEM D25. No items were submitted. •rrrrr H1 LMDERGROUNDING IN-LIE I FE . fPA D V ~- tPMENTI Staff report by Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer, who announced Thal the wool "Angels" should read "Angalls." Mayor Stout asked if there was any cable TV m this. Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer, stated (here was rime that he was aware of, but would check before trenches arc closed up. Mayor Stout statrsi someme needs to encourage the cable canpanics that they aze supposed m be undergmuM as per their franchise. MOTION: Moved by Smuy secondrA by Williams to approve hem HI. Modon carried unanimously, 5-B. rrrrrr Item EI was considered at this time but the minutes will;'emain in egmda order. rrrrrr City Council Minums May 5, 1993 Page 6 rr~~• H2. CONCIDFRATION TO A P-f IMPROV M NTC RF FACF OF BOND ND NOTI OF COMPt ETION FOR TRACf 1 7 a t rv~A DON THE NORTHWFCT ORh OF F'^ cD) ROAD ND SAPpH_~C~fR.EFT Staff report presented by Monte Prescher, Public Works Engincer. Councilmember Buquet felt if action was to 6e taken it should be approved subject to compleion of dte concmm trail crossing az required in the plans and the approval by Ne City's inspection departrnent as to Ne adequacy and completion o(Nat Mayor Stout statW he had noticed tact week that Nc horse hail had not 6ecn surfaced and asked if it was as of tonight. Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineeq stated yes it was. He stated Reign Consrntct{on haz liken this on and has worked well with the Ciry in canpleung this and have done a good job. Councilmember Alczander stated this waz not done by this particular contractor, but done by an oversight He felt i( 55,(M18.(lfl was enough m finish the job, he did not want m punish en innocent party. Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer, felt this mould all be completed by nett week, Release: Faithful Perfomtance Bond (Street) S 713,tp0.(p Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Drain) 74,000.08 Acee{a: Mainrrnarre Guamnrce Bond (Street) S 71,300.00 Maimm~aricc Guarantee Bond (St Drain) 7,400.00 RESOLUTION N0.93-109 A RESOLUTION OF TF{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC}f0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 13725 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Duquct seconded by Stout m approve Resolution No. 93-109, subject m the compleion of Ne concrete nail crossing as required in the plans. Maion carried 4-1 (Akzander no). r.r+er 11. DI ccION OF CI"Y O w 1 OMMICCtON RD'c AND C H D n INC OF Oh h ICCION MEETIIYG~. (Continued from Marcb 24, 1993) Staff report presented by lack Lam, City Manager. Mayor Smut stared this hoc been discussed previously by Ne Council and feh a decision should be made tonight Councilmembw Buquet stated Nat the Commissions wero devek>ped to assist the Council wish specific issues. He felt Ne Commission swctum should be streamlined and a beau allocation of staffs resources mwaMs priruities. He felt Nc Environmenml Menage+ncnr Commission's duties should go to the Planning Commission, along wiN the Historic Preservation Commission's duties going m Ne Planning Commission. He felt the Public Safety Commission could be eliminated and Nat a Council subcnmmittw of two members Take nn any safety issues Nat City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 9 come up as it use m be, He felt Ne Flanning Commfcsion should slay ita current size and condnue wiN them current functions including the responsibilities o(Ne Historic Proservaion Commission. He suggceled Ne Park and Recreation Commission and Ne Community Fourdetion remain as now structured. He stated he did not intend for the area of historic preservation to stop, but it would just be a matter of scaling down by it being given a Ne Planning Commission. Councilmember Williams stated some of the staff ume noted in the study of Commission tlme spent will still be used by Ne Council buause of taking on some of Ne Commission duties; however, she did feel tbat tlrore will be a signi[icant savings made in staff time spent- She hoped Nat Nis scaling down will bring out people who are interested to present Neir ideas on specific issues. She felt some people may have felt in Ne past that if a Commission is taking care of something, Ney did not need a get involved by sharing Neir ideas. Councilmembr Bugtat stated he felt Ne Park and Recreation Commission should mmain as is wiN Neir meeting frequency for raw, but for Nat Council Subcommittee to keep an eye on it. Councilmember Williams felt i(the Park and Rareation Commission's workload lessened, Ney should cut down Neu meetings a bi-monNly. Shc added she did rrot Nink Ne Community Foundation should even be. considered wiN Nis item since Ney wero na a regular Commission. Councdmember Gutierrez stated he concurred wiN just about everything Coutrcilmcmber Buquel sated. He felt public access was a very important feahae. He felt in the interest of trying N save $500,000.00, Nat consolidation could occur wiN some of Ne Commissions. Councilmember Alexander stated he disagreed wiN dw Historic Prexervation Commission recommerdation by Councilmember Buquel and felt they should he kept as a Committee status and meet on an as-needed basis. He agreed Nat Ne Park and Recreation Commission should he kept as is for raw. Mayor Stout stated Nal it was previously discussed at arather meeting Nat all Commission positions be advenisrA and go through Ne interview process. He felt Ne Planning Commission should mmain intact. He tell Ne Environmental Management Commission's responsibilities should be given to Ne Planning Commission. He felt Ne Historic Preservation Commission was important to keep and fch Nat Ne Planning Commissioners could act as Ne Historic Preservation Commission also. He stated the Public Safety Commission should be ralk4 a committee and meet as rwxded when recommendationsarc needed N go m the Council. He did not agree Nat all Ne City sa(f Nat go to Ne Commission meetings were needed. He stated he agreed wiN Councilmember Gutierrez Na[ Ne cost savings was important, but did nm want to cut the public off on safety issues either. He stated he would go akmg with Councilmember Buquet's recommendation of Ne City Courrcil wbcommihee handling safety matters as long as a public hearing process could occur for public workshops. Councilmember Buquel felt Nis would be a more Bexible process doing it Nis way. Councilmcmbcr Guticrtez concurred, Councilmember Buquel felt Net as demands grew, this swcmre could change. Mayor Stout commented nn Commissioner Chitiea's absence from the Planning Commission meetings and commented Nat it was due a surgery she had. Mayor Stout summarized by stating that Nc Hismrical Commission would bC maintained by cross-designation wiN Ne Planning Commission, that Ne (onnal inclusion in Ne plan Nat da Council Subcommittee corduct formal hearings when necessary for public safety issues, that all positions be reopened and rcadvertiscd, wish Ne merging of Nc Environmental Management Commission and Ne Planning Commission. City Council Minutes May 5, 1993 Page 10 Councilmember Buque clarified that the environmental issues would be assigned m the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission would wear the hat of the Historical Preservation Commission just like the Council arts as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire Board. Andrew Arerynski, Assistant City Attorney, stated they would draft the appropriate amendments m wmespond with Ne Council's requests. Jack I.mn, Ciry Manage, asked for an effective date this should all happen. Councilmembcr Buqua suggested this came back et the cent meeting for the Council m consider. He tell staff should go back arM pull alt of this mgcdrer m move it forward as quickly as possible with the intent m suspend mecdngs of me current Environmental Management, Public Safay and Historic Preservation Commissions by July 1, 1993. MOTION: Moved 6y Buquet, secende4 by Gutiertez m approve dm suggestions of Mayor Smut and Councilmember Buquc~ Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. •rrr •• 11. Courwilmember Williams asked for an updam memo and financial report on Lhe I.edig House. rrrrrr No communication was made from dte public, rrrrrr MOTION: Moved by Buquet, sewnded by Alexander to adjourn to an Executive Session m discuss personnel matters and property negotiations regarding the Sports Complex. Motion carried unanimously, SA. The meeting adjourned at 8:07 p,m. Respectfully submitted, Debra 1. Adams, CMC Cily Clerk Approval: Mav 13, 7993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ct1Y COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY M[NUTES RANCHO COCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIC'T' MINUTES Budeet Workshop A special workshop of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection DisMct was held on Thursday, May 13, 1993, in the Tri Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:f19 p.m. by Mayor, Chairman and President Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers, Agencymembers, Boardmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquct II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane }yilliams, and Mayor. Chairman and President Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack tern, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jim Frost, Ciry Treasurer; Bvb Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, Susan Neely, Fina,xe Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Joc O'Neil, City Engineery ShinW Bose, Depur City Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Bob Zettertmrg, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Jerry Grant, Building Officiate Brad Buller, City Planner; Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor, Jana Ellis, Disaster Preparedness Specialist; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superinlendenq Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Il; Bruce Zeiner, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Polim Department, Dennis Michael, Chief Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Lloyd Almand, Deputy Chief Fire Marshal; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer; Ralph Crane, Deputy Firc Marshat; Bob Corcoran, Deputy Chick, and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 Jack Lam, Cily Manager, stated that aII the budgets have been distributed to those that requested a copy. He pointM out that the City has made some painful cuts especially in personnel. He displayed overheads showing the downward progression of the General Fund budget since 1990/91. He stated there is a 76% decrcax from the 1990/91 to 1993/94 budget He ta1kM about the Ctility Tax being adopted and that iF it Fad not been There would be a $2.5 million shortfall in the City's General Fund budget He pointed out That Rancho Cucamonga is a low property tax City and explained what this meant. He stated property taz Rocs not generate a lot of rcvenuc for the City. He pointed out that had the Utility Tax not been approved there would have been $2.5 million at risk in the Fire District Budget which would have resulted in losing one-half o(our lire stations and 33 lire lighters. He also pointed out that the City has always had an increased sales tax rcvenuc each year which was very Budget Workshop May 13, 1993 Page 2 important to the City. He stated until there is additional revenue generated in the Cily we cannot build new facilities or have new services added. He reported on the volunteer program and how important it is to the City. He stated the staff will be looking far ways to make the operaHOn run more efficiently and without any duplication of efforts among departments. He pointed out that the remainder of the Arroyo Seto report items will be implemented. He advised that the Fire DisMCt will M working on civilianizing personnel. He felt the City should explore joint services wish other cities in order to be more effective. He felt a community survey should be done in order to get the response of the residents to give [he City information to do long range planning. He commented on the residenfial recycling program and that the commercial and multi-family units should come on line in order to meet AB 939 requirements. He also rommented on regulafions the City has to comply with regarding storm drains. He pointed out that the City has met with our Congressman in Washington to get assistance. He reported on the proposed law enforcement positions for Fl' 1993/94. He pointed out that the City will be able to do this for $650,660 by leveraging its money with the County for services. Councilmembcr Alexander asked what will happen if the proposed Measure does not pass. Jack lam, City Manager, stated the Sheriff controls the mntrac6 but the Board of Supervisors controls the budget. He commented on the many services that will be lost by the Sheriff's Department if the measure does not pass. He added the Board of Supervisors will determine what cuts will M made in the Sheriff's budget. Councilmembcr Alexander felt all travel to Washington, D.C. should be eliminated and that all Sacramento trips to meet with our legislators should stop since our legislators have local offices and can meet with us hem. He fdt no trips to Sacramento should occur unless absolutely necessary. Jack Lam, City Manager, reported W the Council that he has put a halt on all travel except (or local meetings. CouncilmemMr Alexander staled he would like for the Council to have input in the replamment of a position as an employm leaves the City. Coundlmember Gutierrez asked alwut the hiring of new personnel for the police department positions and (dt Ihat possibly [here should be more sworn officer instead of some of the other positions. Councilmemtrr Euquet statM the Clerks are needed to do reports insead o(the swum officers which is a cost savings. Jack commented on the cost of approximately $160,(N)D for a sworn officer, and That you do get more fur your money if you have a Berk preparing the paperwork. Captain Bruce Zciner, Police Department, stated there i5 a formula they use that is followed for the number of sworn offirnrs, supervisors and dercal slat!, He also stated that is why the number of clerks were nmded to gn along with the other new positions. Mayor Stout commented on the law that is in affect that a police report has to 6e filed with the DisMct Attorney within 48 hours or the person arrested will be released, He stated he would like to sm at the next budget workshop an update on the City's Community Services cost recovery that was done not too bog ago. Budget Workshop May ]3, 1993 Page 3 Councilmember Buquet stated the City is constantly looking for ways to cut rosts. He stated he did feel the Arroyo Seto project peas important to follow through on. He also agreed that civilianization was very important in order to frce up sworn law enforcement personnel. He also felt this should apply to fire personnel. He stated he was not sure about the community survey idea and felt this should be looked at closet He stated he did not agree with the NPDFS unfunded mandate or any other unfunded mandate the state was proposing. Fie felt the City staff is doing an excellent job and felt the State should not dip into the pockets of rides. He d:d not want Rancho Cucamonga to do what other rides are doing by making "perky-jcmkf+' decisions. Mayor Stout stand the budget is a remarkable document that has bean prepared. He commented on the number of employees Rancho Cucamonga has to do the pb compared to what other cities have that are comparable in siu. He mentioned the planning that has taken place and the low crime rate in the City. He slated he does not understand why residents feel the Cily can de all of these good things and it all be done at no cost to them. Councilmember Williams stated she concurred with Mayor Stout and felt the document was phenomenal. She thought the budget was very complete and well thought out. She stated she knows that the City Manager and Department Heads will not spend money if it i5 trot absolutely necessary. Mayor Stout commented on how staf(is using the money wisely and not wasting it. Jack lam also commented that staff is using money wisely and conservatively. Conncilmember Gutierrez also commentei on the excellent staff. He staled he still needs to be taught by the departments what is in the budget. He felt the volmurer program is very important He felt sales tax was the key to this City. He feported on the savings of $500,(xq from the Commissions, and that possibly the City does not need as many staff sinm the Commissions have been cut. He hoped the City could find more ways to be lean and mean. He felt we could still 6e a quality City by doing this. i. Sharon Boydston of Rancho Cucamonga stated she was concerned about the "axing' of the Commissions. She felt by eliminating the Commissions would rrot allow for the wmmunity to be as involved. She felt the City should keep on functioning as it is. She felt the Council should approve the rccommendafions made by Jack lam regarding the budget. Ceuncilmember Buquet commented that the Commissions were not being "axed;' that it was well Thought out He stated the City is looking for ways not to compromise thr. City and still have a quality of life. Councilmembcr Williams stated them is ne way the Council wants less participation fmm the residents and did not want In deny them anything. She commenkd that the items on the Commission agendas had deaeasM, but stated she does not want to cut public participation on any matkr. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to incorporate into the next budget workshop discussions the animal control facility that is not operating at this time and the library services situation, and for wmething In be shown in the budgep i.c., some kind of addendum. Budget Workshop May 13, 1993 Pagc 4 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff would accommodate [his request. ..rr.. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adpum. Motion prried unanimously 5-0. The meefing adpurned at 7:30 p.m. Respecthdly submitted, Debrs ). Adams, CMC City Clerk ApprovN: "' PAGE - City Council Agsntla June 2, 1993 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these Items Is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Coll: (Y.puei _, Alexaider-,Stout _, Wd6'anu _, and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from adtlressing any issue not previously inelutled on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a aabsequeni meeting. Comments are to be limited to Ilve minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calentlar Items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion, Any Item may 6e removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for tliscusalon. 1. Approval of Minutes: April 21.1993 (Buquet absent) May 5, 1993 May 13, 1993 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/12(93 and 5/19/93; and 1 Payroll ending 5/6/93 fcr the total amount of 51.170253.97. 3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of The 'Notice Inviting Bids- 10 for the AITa Lomo Storm Drain Assessment DishL^t 84-2 Storm Drain Replacement at the north terminus of Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Assessment District Fund 84-2, Account No. 954631- 7083. PAGE City Connell Agenda June 2, 1993 ~ ~`~(~ u~CJ-r 2 RESOLURON NO.93-119 I l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CRV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 SFORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT,' IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORILNG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval To reject all bids as non-responsNe and outhorae the lq readvertising of the 'NOt~e Inviting Bids' for the resurfocing of the equestrian rinks aT Heritage Community Park located at the southwest comer of HilKide Rood and Beryl Street, To be funded from PD-B5 Red Hill and HerBage Redemption Fund Account No. 90-0637-9221. RESOLUTION NO.93-120 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIflCA71ONS FOR THE RESURFACING OF THE EQUESTRIAN RINK AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND BERYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORILNG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval To execute Reimbursement Agreement for Ig undergrounding of overhead uTilBies for TrocT 14192-1, located on Hellman Avenue south of Nineteenth S}reeT, submitted by Hix Devek)pment Corporation. URA-015. RESOLl111ON NO.93-121 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE Clrv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UiILJTIES LOCATED ON HELLMAN AVENUE NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET TO NORTH OF NINETEENTH STREET AND ON NINETEENTH STREET FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO 175 FEET EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE PAGE City Council Agenda June 2, 1993 3 6. Approvol of Historic Point of Interest Designation 93-01 -Son 22 Gabriel Valley labor Association -Approval to designate the Cucamonga Labor Camp Site, located between Foothill Boulevard and Anow Route, west of Cucamonga Creek, os an Historic Point Of Interest - APN: 207-211-01. 10-21.31, 32, and 34. ReloTed File: TenTafNe Traci 15540. RESOLMON N0.93122 37 A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 93-O1. THEREBY DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA LABOR CAMP SITE, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ANO ARROW ROUTE. WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD COMROL CHANNEL, AS A LOCAL HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN: 207- 211-01. 18-21, 31, 32, AND 34 7. Approvol to accept the Milliken Underpass Project. CO 91-007, os 39 CompleTe. Release Bonds and aumome the City Engineer to file a -Notice of Completion.' RESOLUTION N0.93123 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPBNG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MILLIKEN UNDERPASS PROJECT. AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of Ilrst reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without dlscusslon. The Clty Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for dlscusslon. L rONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINAN E R rl II A7INf~ NpN_ STORM l^.~ATER DLSCHARC-ES Ac_ RE9UIRED BV TH NATIONA POI I I RANT Dlsr^HAR Ih"INATION S•'SrFM PAGE City Council Agenda June 2, 1993 4 ORDINANCE N0.512 (second readir~ 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI1V COUNCIL OF THE CfIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CAUFORNIA, REGULATING NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES IN THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONDUCTING THE FIRST OF TWO ADVERTISED PLIBUC HEARINGS $7 PERTAINING TO "HF FW OF NNIIA ASSESSMENTS WITHIN TH PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) (r;oMinued hom May 19, 199J) 2. .ONDU .TIN - TH FIRSi OF TWO ADV RTISFD IB IC H ARINGS 67 PERTAINING TO TH LEW OF ANN IA ACSFCCM NTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICTS NO 1.2. 3A 38.45 d.7 AND B (COrMirwed hom May 19, 1993) 3. -ONDU TIN -. TH FIRS7 OF TWO ADV RTISFD PIIBLIG 11FARINCS 112 PERTAININ -. TO THE W OF ANN IA ASC CSM NTS WITHIN STREET UGHTINC- MAINTENANC DISTRI TS NOS 1 '+A 5 6, 7 AND $ (Con9ntled horn May 19, 199J) G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will Open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 92-14 -HOWELL- 151 Appeal of the Planning CommLSUon's decuion denying a request to remove two Eucalyptus trees located on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Lop, west of Rock Rose Avenue - APN: 227-411- 42, (Continued hom December 2, 199?) PAGE - City Council Agenda June 2, 1993 5 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the Clly Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. OONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND STREAMLINE CITY GOUNOIL 174 SUBCOMMITTEES J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is lha time for City Council to Identify the Items They wish to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be dlseussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the Clty Council. State law prohibits the Cily Council from addressing any issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to 6e limited to five minutes per Individual. 1. CONSIDERATION OF R 9 I ST TO D ET STR ET R 9 IIR rnrNTS 182 F4B1Q,306 PALO ALTO STREET - MR MARK AUSnN -LOCATED ON THE NORiH CIDE OF PA O A TO Sr11 T ~'~ST OF N R AV N L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby cenify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 27, 1993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. P P f V NY 1 f r 1 4II° ` O lNw ohs h V ` E ui ii \~• N\6 \• n~< O~Z n: O~ d O 00 00 •ryry00NOF 01'N•OIYPPOOOONTIOOWAO•IFONIFOTNNM T •O OY •r.PO.ON.OPAOOf •gNOONITITNhNO.Ih01•N~rrIN N O O •FNPTPNNgFNAgNOONVPONMdMII.1A.Oiq•1NgOMgONPPNr W F NN N iNTMFNnIr NJYA N •VnI w ~ r T w Y T1T • M1 A O s n n w aw w • ~•• JN:=pr NAON Yr wr~NrNNA NNNNNNNN MNA•TATMTIIV{~NJ11•101~NNnnNNM wrFFOOSrA~IrrNwN~NMrrJ~r~rNMrHNrrN11Yw~:%HwrNrJrN r~.IrNJ NffFMhhhhFhFhhhFhFhhhhhFFhhFFFFhhFFFhYhhhhFMhhhhFhh OFFFFFFFhFFFhFVhFFFFPFFFVFI"FFFFFFFFFFFYFFFFFFFFFFFFI` < _ _ _ u 1 I • 1 • 1 • •• • • • • Y N N 1 N /N A• F O NL O • NWO O F YO }O\Nj JO Or J l N ON\i JN • FWFO h F jNr >hNOY OJOOONOY OYT NPNL VI o e la• \n .~rti FNrN•w oj: yw r$• <o VOV1MvV •7giA Yf W~•NV C'w i`~OOY !-Y Y O 10 • V ViiVY V ~NNJhY• MOY•~ O J•=0l N ) NJVL N •O AVFVFYVW V yV Vf»aip F_•J• iVV ON irF ah V! • NN \ JN N aJNNOJJ00 `Y\ N.O • Y NtN : N V \Y W •O JiF•NYiOiY i JOSOM i 1 M VM N YON\ h i\NiJY JLOJ9Y \hOr9ZFi JJiOVJ J N Y V h YMYNYFiWOJ. V~VpiYJN~N= ON V`Vw! VV \ NN N W V! OYOiYNF9i iiY Y WL.V hO• > A 1 W N Y MYL N lQ N i hY! y• N CVON NNJ h Y. < Y€f $Is:i YS.~' \'lluw Y.N:IW.i '.f~ \iOWh~ ~W W O a.IOVW F <JYi._ J'J iOwY\Fi._YW I_JrNSNWO Y 2 J~ NW ii w.iMOMY VFM ~ YY CO YYiO r f VY W i ` O VY W Yi> YSY N Yl`hNZ IWJiY>hhWW i WYO i 00_ ON YO O<_flOh•hiM1>Ni !F M<_O Jh9•YiilLMwe iW O F N `N NY y~YIV LVW iV JNJ W.JiJMlFNY VWiMJiMY!`fY ~h iiJ V N IIh10 00 ~~OMOt~Y~0Yp~20<~O~VJMOYOM~YM~>..IlYY Nai O NL LO 'IJ iF<hY `.1f0< NL l YLf hiNi h i>• OMZM •= Oy iYYO•LLV iY y yOlVYYNWW W i>FJ V W \p 00 JF>Y'J YYFV Y Y~ff =O JIMYJYlJi~~V •O.YJ O i ! YYYYYYYONYYNYiYYOWYNiYY 1>VMYV•YYMFY•MaYi ~ W'J OW NJN~•JYJI1M J>OS{F ShFWNYiOYl9YSFYs11F •>ll M>ONMJOO~JMh>`iFVLFF~``4 101 « r\ >~Y•i riiwY~NLN`w~01i1•O~~~MM~WZ)N~>VMMN`YOVMMO w Wi Yf Y i e u° i Ni i` ~ o `gyp ~ iW y~~u ooui o W V NN NO N •YNVYO W h JF iF • JO M» p O W ff pJ W.y Z y O .YJN f h Z J J W• SlJ! 9NW M i YW ~NliVi ~u ~ p > i YZ VNWN J!J O iV Mii•>N Y N J f f O NN M• Z YW Y00 Fii OW W F= YO OV MV W Y1 • W~>iY JO NYYWWf YV O f J _ i M ZiJO i! OiY00JOYJ iN JiY in S V >• YW i YNOYY Nf WNNiVY00Yiy 9_MYNJs> N> OW <M O h Y iV f>JOMOFYf fNYON >>O~IN Jia •WS~CYiO _O 00 OO lY J LONOJWJi< >OZ f VN NY 9i yiff ViN>1>NOO>••IW VYMNV VJhfi>NJ•WffJ O ! OIWYi FilYO f W JY000 Y\MiifY 1YjVYlWWy f _ V_ _V_ NYO •WO<_Y_Y_iNY •YtYMJiYOIf>ZW WWW »'(h0 J i OIMiJY MNML ONWi0000 JW O NMhNMOFN 7 Y Yy pW <YJFYf MyVp 1~JWlaaYII~~N yIIYIi~1i pp •!9 FhiV• J sN NY WYi. Y1YJOfYJJWS<O'J ~NYhNNVJ~i>~Wll~IflVh J > Y 1.Y VOyJII>WM>VYJN>iN<00 9iYJJYJfNhfOiiiWWViN W ~ ~f ff OOJJJii>O.Yi_.. VNJY•Yi O.ffWiiNJ0000<t~?9 Y > ii fffffff<fVOOY O OOOOVYVVVYVYYYYYYVYYV N •• •O A>NFOIiOAOr'IOFAFNrFNNAONNO•NNO0I.ONOA•NNwN • O >O yY NA Ff TIIOONWOANNI'I•OOVNO.OOOFAF•F•A•OOOTI • N IM • h hNO1iOM^O NO +rNNrNy~•AONr •YONfN• AO A A y O ~N A NnN A A FF wI AANT TN FA A J i 9. .. E N. , :. .. :: W. . ., . . .: .:6 P•i• N• \•W• N:{: O f opNOeoaooeAwlneYeeehhr•oeaeNOaAleoeaooonoNaheeNe rae..r.NOlooNSOOeelhweneeNAelYeNnewoAlAnooM1OOOaolarePne NANOINNOOwNNwOAMeMnPVOONIOVM1ONINNOa00NNOa1pO1aN ONryaNOphAM1YONVOryV:MhNYpYNM111AwN~rOM1rPpaYPhNr Ah AA :IaVANA :n NNANw: NOaNN r:wM1 w A ry AN A N N w A r POwNAVNIN•POMNAINVMOIOMNNIN<hYlOwNnINrM1YlOwNA1NVh• •Y/wiwwrri ~»~•Viw wAwMrMwwHHM H•OIMHti•••H ~y HrYl~Mytiti1~•lI~M000000 00 hM1hM1hhhM1M1M1M1M1M1M1hhM1M1hhhhhhM1M1M1M1M1M1M1M1M1M1hMhhhM1M1M1M1hh~hh OhM1hM1hhM1hhM1hhhhM1hM1NM1hNNPNMhFNM1M1NMhM1NM1hhPMM1M1NMMhwM1Nhh V r O A 9<~ Va„ =~0 V w :LO O~ YNtl ON6 J N i Y •L L • O • Y OM O \ NT OVp Nry<NNj YN1 MY Or i O NN iVY • VNiNNYhO NO \ p< i ~ • NN s lANnr~i! eP • V +N wwY io NN le YLN ' wl 11 W w+ r \ OOV ON Y i<M OOONOWIO N ~O YW Ops a0 OJ N Oi V ONNO O i ry• • M wV O 00 ON <N •mYmry\WOO u i L•L • YO ^O< : N Y OOiar O OP N 00 Y< V L V 00 O M \VO_ Y =_ JYJ [O NNV YN MY ••i Yh\V _N i-_J•Oi<n i • __V\ iWd f::h :: N JO 990N NM •ONW N yJfY Ny fW OV: <iMW NNMNY ••M V WiM VLY YV_ iJW YOIy s~ LiNNIVO«Y N w JJWI •• y 7 'JNW IYNJiJJiNNJ LNOO O y I~ y yY OfYI NVWVYW <YAMYYYjV • OCNO~iNy i i VVdiJ\i iY WJO N~J P« ` JY i VYNN _O _M <\1\NNO <\iV\LpUhll VI\Vf11L NihN VOf/YY i iWiLi\11 Z ii0yy•L if J 2 •f O YYhtOOLIiY YYL YOOY)O~YNY OhO1NyVYL<VV\JYVY~6 YO<7NMY ONMN hYM <NJMYN<MiW9MwN N fNiiYiiiO\NiinN itlOJNwI VN i L) i O MFN<MO N\LMNOVNM \iNN YiNOY\O\ YJJYw OW Y<YNWLJVJ JMOYWNNNYYiiWYY< iMWJ t9W \\VMMJJi <Y WFyy`` •J •WVNVO • N\ll \Li )L-VJ YNViLNYMnY a'J V iY~ hM:i`~ 91\ItY V<N~JIYNNNYNMNYONN<\ Fi J ONAOILF~ Y pN <NL 3N1 Y)<V W F OOY \n J NWiN J iVii Mf)y Y VWVi iNYWyW) NYV MYO~r iiJYFJO\~SJ•YJV\~^ N i V O~ O9if»Y~<~JJWZ \YiN„' ••NMWLi~\rYYO hVh YNYN/ •~iONOOS\00 OONN < •MO Y IYLNiMlJ VVOIVJii7 O N•.O i h G L N 1. F LN iN : Y p• u of ~o ~i o iu 41 iH ~.\• i w w i Ni io ayJi I~i ~ '" s ~ W iY N 00 W• J N • YN i N Ow i OOY Y W N L J IW •f WW (,Y < LJ •< iY ~ ^Y W • NMS <Ni0 D NJ <LNMW W F JW 1 ~ NY ~ F~ M i NY W L J NiV N)J«i y O L O[O YV JNIN NM Li J N iOYVi • 0`WNNNO` VO YJhV JV JNNJYYN)J11 :Y ~Y~iNOYM i <iY J YOii1YY~M N )O i NY ~wYJWiN 1 i LwiVW O SiC)• VN ONY 1 OMfi • OJ<00 w< N[OM7<IV FVYON i0 WiiJlLi)Yn L•YVY ON IWiYN Ni 1NN NWJ iN FOYw\NYO V)VlfiY9L0 SY<i •NJW •J tV< V N 1 O )Vf <yiNIVON i1)NLVW VN •Y ISL V iFL1 i ~O •W ))OwJNY •Y NI Y J Y i9tJV N•LN iNiH90V~<Y N•i J 1 i0Y1iN1 YiVhIN <i i1J hi0 i N) Y OJO<OJ NJ <O7Yi«WbiWM ~1sW~VpW~1Wi y1Vii )p f0 OOJNOLW •< <FN N)NYNYJ ~• N OLWMNNJY<I~JVY~dlYYi •JIN)MMV IYVOI<N<WMNO)NWWYWMV_<_W_O_O_O_p)'J Oi ii<OViiO0 ss91 •)O GGN)VVI<!1 «Y OOOOWWWLLLLLLLLVVVY iiNNN1lVVYYWVJJJiiiittiiii M NalnnrAM1YY0Y1wM1IM1ONlM1IrNVVNNVNYn11N•OlrnrNNM1lIhrN IrVL^NONNIM1M1PNaINANOAVM1AVwNIVNNNNNNNPNIVVNNNNNVANpN H wA NhNwNAAMNMI nIa~1NNM1NwMwN1111 wwnPNM~lMNNnAnlhNAnIAwNA~1 2~ E m; -i oTweepneehee<reNeryoaoeeooooenaeeeOfanleeNNweoofmtlla •r m•i• oreoooeeeweyNOOlnofwoewoppowrNeeeeryF.+oNwaFewow<w1y . ....... .....•..........•..•..•..... . ... TJ N NNOOOOOMONaOwmOONpN00001<NONNNwFVVNNONTOr.I O V.IMNNaF \• • ' OaTNyyNeTPOwT==NNwN N I OOONmNINNNOwnFOFJP Oryry OF I Imry N y NN1r: <r1 NOw w \•V w y N w N 1 T O•i• W• • O• ~~ • n u• 1 •O_ ~ S JaOnNTaNOwWPOwNnIN<h<wOyNTINIFWaOMNTIN<FfwOwNTIN PO y NNN N~V I~I NT~11• ~ I~MNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN uIiN NN.w'INn ewaN MMnNNNNNNNNHNNN NNNNh ~N /V OFFhhFhwhhFFhhhFFhhhFFFFhhhhhhFhFhFFFFhhFhFhhFFFFFFhF •1 > • • Y • • • _ - V • < V i I W i / i V aY O w N • VeZ O O W '1 O P \ • •• • i •OZ w w Y VO M O Yi0 V H • • •p O hw O 7w O O t 1 OV F < N - P • • _ _ N V W NO 1 V YON FFN OOw v ~~ / • • -~ 10 Oh NMhF WOY OVNV YV O r.1NV0 V eT ON Iw OZVN VFi OwOJ JI~i111 Vw T • • • • NYery h 00 NO Y O>Yw Vf wOwY VaN O O<6i NOFO y niY OM J Y.Y• J<JV OMp1 INYVN wJ _Na ! • <FINV N <i NV Y OWZ- fiYi rY YVYLO J •VWY r V tMl • • J i _ VM h iM ) S VMOZ fNM . « V V Y M I Y h r 1 'J\w • • O N N •V OYY Y l/OW ZOSr V VY VF i 1 i0 OV 66 > VVI • • I • I<ONfF NMNOINw YTW-FJtOJ WV-! Yw -JYVO J- CZl WNWN •LYV •~ION• •O VV N O M VN W IY NV. N Sf0 % ~ 1 yy II yy 1 iJVJVt 1~jOJN iJWNLH~WrwI NJ Y\~ -~Yw OOOW VW~~pY00WCOWFWjN o •, •i• YiYIF<VFVY--iO •-V9iYFNV Ni9i wOJ ~Of YWTN9f O'J6>V : OO _ •w• 1 • •F• N : i-ow NOW F. zeeN worse zu-m .ep:olf Ns NOVVUOWVMVNN9i-~ h -OFIL NM V iN iVZ •O SSM 'J iiYFiiiY Nl VYJN-OIiO YFNO N -NNiNOIJW wNf N..WY FV •~• <YNN iMNiNi .p 9\! Nl V\Wi0 \t \ Y »90\VN>F 00 WNW • _ __ J OYVWNYI WYM iiwlY M YrF< MLFwhi1N • JZNWY F F F p ~ O OjW • • /V• __ _ _ _ tlWWWY1WF-IF • i0 V WI (97J li i<WL a V9 i pi 9W NNiiN N-Y~rLINOM.W <OYWWNh~WlWW1~IMhWJOIN<h WhiMOY tl •W• WFN < <OVVZJ`iF-Fi:iYtOJWYVZFYii-NLFOZWWi<FWI H W /O• YiWWiVNVVf• ~~•• Wi<ViVWNWWh OYwO-OVWON NJ9YJ91i'J m OYC YVNO<IJ 1 i <OVY O O WNe V • OJOOFVO`OOVF.INOW iWWFYW-<iYNONMNY FIOYWi -FOiONYJ J •Z• iM NiOMO >F Yf hV OihWMNMNY FFVY OF NFYUWi V O SFO Y 2ppi ` yy yy Y siJ\\<Y\~wi <Vwi~~{ M ~~YM ~w1!~MfAJF ~ M M ~ YN OM p l N wri>.. Vi F OO Ofi VYV S S • • V • • • h ~ V ~ • • F h S S _ = M i Y = • • •• f • V O F 1 U i ~~ V N f~ YYO W • Y F- V• W F N • i MO iiiY < ~ • y O i- V 1N I<1!M W Nh N WP Z i •• • • W M w NJ YYYL Y YZ O Y y O s V J 2 O WN s 1. se V • NN i • F N iWJOf M111 I!h FY F VN • F h NW N N YiN NY<WV YVV iN WW J NNOJ ~yJ YN i • • JYI YMYN hYJiYYOZh<> N000 VOMO iN Y iV • ~ • p y i t~jY VYOI I~~OWY~~~OiL1i1f<~Ni VWWp>N .>pFN i eVYwF WiY • • <1 Y> \OM DFJ<i V YJJOY YONi<iOY N WWYOYY9 .Z>N • • YN<J O iNNOVWiOfF JhfhJO~~>N iOMZWWtW >NJ iN Y'1W OOW • • W i> f iYWY VN iN<NYYY V•IYMiOiY MJYi<hN OYY N Y YI N V ~ N V J • • i. iNW . IY NYV YOMW <MYN<l Y JI•Y WO N i pOOOi i• VN . 1 ~ y M•N J WFy yV{ Y i I/ZNNN Y• Y Y1~Y JW MM W<YO 2 i i yy 8 ~ ~ _: y p y ss /tt p / i y y e WVYONWWY Y III Ji=~.~JY< i JhOWVV>ifVYZYNitMN'J-i11[VW 1Y0 » >Oh>NNYWLWZi •<• •i VYI"IM_O_<_Y_I M_JiYZffYi00YYi7 •f «YWWWWVMYNOO •If11VVWNYNi iiii OOOOW-WWW--WWWYfYYYYYYfYYYYVYNNNNNNMNNNNNN 1 • • wNVFnNONwFNaNOpaNMPOwNYMOp000NwOrIN NVNhNwwMaFwIwMNNF ~Y1 m~yOnlNnNwN~Nw~rnN N•<w~Fhrr Fllal ~ IyNIlA1~O~~wNOO V'%T<d„ ~ O r _ N _ _ NTT NnN OT Np p N n N TVVVN NVO T • • > ~ • • I- G L P N V V_ iNw UiN J<M yYl pi0 SiWO ao M! O~Y u W ai i i V; I Tiil w~ N~ ~i°i real o• a, ..i ii o• si o• <1 ~O Z • Y • Y •~ ~O M1i Iw IV IN I~ i li lY eeaooTONNOYrNe<n/en NoM1eeeNaooeaNen/Yew a °N eo y°<e+ai ae°n °e wniarwinHn ..N aNNeTNrv r NNan •iN N T iN r n r n i JMnnNNN"hhrtir~•/I/OY NNNNNNNNNNNNMN frM1hrPM1hhrhrl•rrM1NhM1hh OrrrrrM1l•rhhrM1hrNhhM1hM1 r Ww < < M1 ~a Y „ O i i • N • M W • n i O N 1 O M M1N YO 1 MA N fJ WYwN O/ J I W rM1~IN ~ IIJ== O 1~1 f Of yn V M fJyV ~V O OwiNNwal ONNN Vi OTiTJ•<O M \ JJ W• • e~Ma ~WM <ZO {~ <MM1 Oh~T~i MYTfi07 Y1JN O Milt Ifj yWV'NJie/ W~H rOOJ\ril <YIiYi• JWT e o•eaeWir<aYrYOYM1 N a •Oi O J1/YY ! WFi <~nFi1~OV •V~~NiiMYNW NMWT'JNNhT ~YYffhN OiNiiwh\INWMY iii iY O\ON•YYYJ•WNYO•YiWiu T ~`J<i ihN/iSS MriM1OM1W MirWOLhMNMN~~wOOVOMN O N J N = yh i < O • .'J O M1 V WO j O W WN i <`~<w Y/ ~ i ui~~ iuio • ui u W«ie s O~OW h MOMN N\MV M •i1Li J YWN JjiV WN JJ'1V< < NOh< Oi i< •i~ljYyjYWfMM~yW• ~O VMybN WiOhi9lYFYJ O• u •Y OiNh JNWh 1Y jYO~JtNON;Oi~i~ii Y W< MNSh •f lif •V iY Y iOWJFMWM1YN <W WW WN 1•ihY<JVW<i NMMFhM1NhO ~« WfJWYiYNjNNNNNMhW NMMNNNY M1fhO~J }jiiijiY NaNT//J/PNOWTTw1YYNN TaThhrTNNaNNO MI•raNhO MaA±:T/NyTNN~M=T~M1/N _ 4~ P N P f V ~~i ~a.P. V~1 ii 00 OYW J ¢ Y ? 00 • O Om NNNO NI'IO OPN O'INO.OUOPOON0000 P'.10NNF O OOPOpOFNN •••m0•.N 0000 POmh ON NOPOhNNNONNN•Nw~OONNNm mNN.1001N n •'1 m yFNO •Nm w1 +1 ..N E N Nh •. H N OM N aN <.Oi<h0 •I .. N ~. NiFr1N Y'A NP •. v N r N a n n n n n n n n n n n n n n ~m~pmQewPefnml•-ew e.•.NnNaFmw e.C.N CN•n woyNm.rNeFmworNm•NaF.Wyw w++a000•M1i.hiN NImiNNNNNNMryN N~0.1N1.1^1 TI~1 i.IATN•I TrN•l /NIm ~m FIR ~TINIi~~m T~N.1 .N.IT1 NmOFFFFFFM1hFF1•hFMFFFM1FFFFFFFFFhFFFM1FFFI•FFFFNM1FM1FFF OFFFFFFFFFFM1FFhFFFhM1M1hM1FFFFFhFFFFFFFhhFFI•FM1hFFhM1FFFF ui <~ cw ~ L P/f U \• N/< o:i .W-i .. or z• ~~ ¢• 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 LffO P NS• Vii• h20 H NY MFN `VY~ 'YVF F wFW FWF hr O u FL NN \ J LLLLV viv !V¢mVOv W .vfwviW v ~ .. l ll ~ tla r a a =i NJ u NP \ \ JW FN W iV i\ 2 NN \ \ Fi NN \± • O N • x W O ~J >1 O O O _ t __ F mW ry F 1 F O t V_ MO O T 0 ~F F i d Nf 1> )Y V • U F iN _ _ V O M O LL V V N i i C ~ Cy > p ) ¢R LtV N Y N i t = m z ~ fh \ w N ea \ ~ r \i~w..Na x~" \.ri T 00 yM N : NPNSFPN W N• mW J WMwOFPN J6 • Op G• pW LLm6VOm0 .[ is s . s¢ o a _ •• < < in '~ V ZQ NV¢f lZ RW FY mN N. \O ¢MWOr6h UUFU¢_ ¢_V +O iJW_V U IN GM OJ W¢¢Wm W N OJwM1• ¢j¢ w\ Z WNWZNNOY..iN LL¢J~7W\ONT NSWM 2 OU62N N_¢JYiF¢ IYGFOO Jf 4f20Y OM WV.7NLLUtl~ NWVN h10 6Wf FZr FWNSONf ¢ZFNN ZONNh2NNWJ¢i..2 •NNNWV4Z fwl O•<f C[xW<Jx ¢NVUJ2JW1•fwmJfJU LNIW iVUOOjxOF 7JMxOW eiJ W_J L_OOLfu Yh OW Wfr SC.(N~OZZ~rhV V NiWF< JN¢O<JOOUI2JY VWO7WU•LLx000w¢U JILU V YINZWYZ2M0MV:wOU FN60Y23ZJ<NUO MIiJYNpp>z NJNiLLZraN OJJmWrMNn t•;Y.WLLLLLWO¢WJW<LLJ<fJ).F LLLL~I f W )nF¢W>saNLL<>6JaOLLViLLO « 6¢¢xNLL><N O f .n F NN ~ wr ~w • i.Ni F¢ r O f N V w u +J i z JO i . O 2 2 r V FU y M .. J aV Y i ff F2 F F V~ _ LL LW ¢2 M OS fN f N u „ h_ 06 O'0 Z f ¢ Y V N W w • i w • F J p Z O yN w w F 7N •N N W J LL~ 6 V W N ~ tl M r W N U j i'¢ • ~ _ • Y ZN ~O 00 W > Wf <6WV>OZ NJ Zu¢ VO O W Y. W¢ FP WNM1MLSY O m> w 'Jr JN LWtl N ILW W f N r0 NWONYW•.J • +Z 2 OLV¢W < W¢ i N'2 WVZVOFJ tlfW hWiFW'IF YmN N O L tlM N~ H p fOJ(r90 WW¢fW000J OO[•hW •LLVF wli O W V fi it IL 'J tl PMtlYJtl(VhFrfhNpVi•N2N:liiM(V Y PM J IY j IW W O W W •(WLOiii Wf W jV Zi1 •JS t0 y0 f M j • FI• OW mW w(ULLZN J . ••J600VJ p Z • O Oi W jw2i •wVib6 OMNYtlJ w>•¢•jN Oj Nm O W 2 20 4 f ¢JNjf YZ2MNW • WW WW> iWZOOW~MW(tl O U (f fh M <4YWWOmJO• JJOifhFZihF VOtlF F2 tlW FJ JJ LL Y JFI.OwMJJWUiFV 2NYJ26¢NOWODNYJjtltlj !f U O JS MW IL UJJJJJltlN9ff•fWWWWWOmfW7 (ff(W VO L N V f.4 L O( •ff •f (fff((<OmmeeeeeOWe00eVVVVVY Nh N F • 00 OIII N •. MNNOONFOO<TO•wNFFFOFwfFO..N 1•N<MPW •• N w1 mN =N M OOOV1.10pNITMmInIN •2N•.pOONNMMOm O•.< •• tl m• O m PFNNMNNf ONOO N rymNNmmNNN• •Nh MI• 111 T MP PN P TM1TNFM1•INNNw N NNFANFhF NIY III •o• ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ 1Zi • ~ i i i A ~ ~O~ .G i°ui .N ~O• • 111 I . • i ~ ~ ~W~ •f• •i •tl~ •01 •i~ •W• •>• f v V_ `NP J4.. ¢N i~ <'JO h¢ OJL Y ? :. :; N; i < ; \• 0~2~ • ~ N O: JA •O• •Z• rc i •4• •>• IIZ• •y• • 6 • N • N •W• iz: w 11 i ~ •Q •O •O • Z •W ~> NNm000000m0 OJmOTM100J0 O„Om'InP00000MOO00mopOAOP NaN000h opTObNOpi tlT0000NNO000mO00+PP NmahFP NO1~ OTaa-0tlaONmOO P'>mOOhNONtlOo m NJNOO TNtlaTTN m O Nw1a NNT^AT tlaAANT~PNeN N .~~ O NN NA FNNN .+ Y• A n T.INO/`0P0• OhOPOwN T.INOhmPONNTaNbM1mPONNTaNOM1OPPNNT + 'NN'n NNNNTm0000N-0bbbrhrr~-hM1M1rh mm bT NTTrT.1T TTw1T m>~TT~~wN1 IlIT TNTTT rI TTTTTTmTTTFTTmmTTTT~~TT i~~wlN-I~rM1rshM1M1.-M1M1M1hrM1hM1 ~. hr-wrM1hrM1M1M1 rrM1M1 rrM1rM1hM1M1rM1rr OrhrM1rrM1hrhhM1hrhrrhrrhrhrM1rrrrhPrrM1rrrrM1hrrrrM1rM1rrhr L ! f 10 ! 0 0 ! 0 •i U ON• NP P PTN N „\T F N• 0¢\ P Y \PN Y m00' NP O O P• r ~w0 4 O\O > aAON Tf aN • NM1 • hA ^ Nap + N\2N eLh N b PJw 00 N r NO\PP \\1 f~ NVP L6 62 m\N ^PN2N\\ PU> IWfO OT NJ ON!! 000pWb0 N\~• NO NL Q¢V •F V6AM WO¢L 6Wn < WWV !N I IOVV¢VM1VOINN\ L\Iw 40_ UNih MI M1u SNLNNfNJNy¢ O U J¢ U WW LfV JJeJOJNww~uAVjN J II mJ LJ¢ ¢Yf fN !h¢¢¢ l \WLG/\1N ENO L NSM o0000F•N N2N6N~wL JV6 N Off 2 j0 fD0 TOVLL WLwnLFQOY000'V WJQQIIWJN UNJ O'J <JmQZO UV ¢LL L\ OJOOQmJOMW 60WINN UU Om WSf NN _OmJO FOJONWL >¢WW6¢LL ON L w =Y.N¢! ? eL 6lhLilM1LLLLZeNLIOOp OwmL WLLV LL p2 JJ OUJ ~LLL iNf NOOIOLLONV`NIZ ON4 YQZ NO f2'u N2N tiJJ OONN NNZ f OJYOr ¢ON xN¢r +f MNOi oVrM1ZN ¢uJ4 w SM1 VLM1WOFJ DFN JWNh ¢OhJLOrJNwuW_WWW<J006wg60\WW ~N <_'_Y wO6UG2WW hV~ wN NSVFW Vf Y ywyNfO=WOW* N20mlm ZwW UK if .[Y f.['Y < v WW > OL w V2N m=~V> JL4 OO~+'nN LLO+NNVL000O~VOOU64F<VfJM1VV.[• USLJO y~zLLf< DzLD<auzzLZLLO<z wr.r Nu e1.wT.~n` ONN¢>NJ 0m VLLQIm<r70w JLJ¢7rQ60KJ¢WO>f uOM1LJJ il2¢ NW'J y• QNO ~Q OMLLLOL VLL 'O e~«Nf O > zu•u6 O Jj•W ~' • n~u w iWWJiuttlewJ)Y6> JJUN <~. DW~<JT J>wOLN fJ O¢OLffN6Nm¢VW~¢e000OQOyfLeNJfLO<LL fLTNO Y J U ¢ _ M n M1 2 M1 N h h Y f N • i J ~ H N 2D h UW O• N eN M FW O K 2 K fYOU= W W N Ni V QW Q W M O O y YZ M1 N i •M J w NO < N~ nNNWO y i Q i W NZ iii Z F V i `. Y 'U OW < O .Ff• OY <ML ¢ U O MNO~ ~NNN rf ¢=2Nf iOFw w OLU 'JOQNNw t it WfMp f W NDO iJNN r L06 ZJ¢LWZYNh6>N Q fZ02 n 6 NOJNwNmU •J.Vi VO<[WY6 ~~ii>n1YNOJLNYViJ~Diii/w>F~ Q;OW LYON OL •D¢<¢ mLU¢ LOGOQJO< OML OOrNOQLJ<2< M1WUONW Oprf 9r¢W f i0_ FfW W'9 <MNL• 9h OIL 1<ff¢LWW ~ONONLLN 2LUii<SYOM1<« irwU N Q •9<O •r2YLL 2.jiw u0i •YN m JmW<f'1 d4¢O ON¢0006LYQQ pYJ ¢WFON 1W •<WNOOOOJN ~1ZNLjJN •<LO ¢K LmKFW00 <6LLYwyfLpNO 21LLlLJOLYOQZNNfM<VQi ~O M}~WWVNY WFM1UNmVJ4QQ USQ<>FWL6WOZOVNLNNQ7<WNmJOQM<iJ jp<WWWWiQ YUVVVVUUVVV VVVOOOpOGO00WWW WILLLLLLLM1VUNVOOJV U'YUUOJSj TaT-00f00'On NN<POM1PM100PNaPOJM1POONM1NINM1<10NaNNaOaM1ON mrrfmaNhONP ONNw1NOTNnaNrONNAT10Tma00N1aNIf TONO•Nl/IT O.I a hw1N hNNTT MrNNNOM1FOMTT JrNPPNONPTI.IT T.4NTTmPar NlflMNO~ T V Y O T ` N P F P VRI =;0 2LL0 f D O ~• P e: :3 :• .: ..i „: . s: .Y T.>i: •f1 \• •C• \ • Ot • N•f~ e~>• of i i i of a• •D• ~2• psi ~m •f •Z• ~ ~ • •2~ •M• F• •6 •O• •L~ •ti~ ••r: • / ~ Y ~ ~ • I • ~ • 11 • ~ • • 21 •• i~ O O• Z• W O~O~HO~N OOO~~~POO•OAOm 00 ~~•ONNOONOOOONO f0„NON000••000 O •O ~ O vOVwOf00 NOmwOON0000f0 00 NNONOHOmO rn•mONwwOONOrubTTPTOTPA~•N•POP~TmNNTO hTmN1mNPONNNN N mOTPN O.OOT NN~• •Mf • m .•m N VNry A NOT~'• ••ti ~••• O r• NN m .1 .. b a • J•NbrmP O~•NTINOrpP O~+NT•NOrmPO••NT•NOhOPOVNT'INbrmP Or•N T'f umim°Tn°Tn.m..nnmPnnmmmnn$$$$$$$$$$~riaiiiiii+ii7iiiiaiaii+ii >hrrrrrrrr..nnnrr-hhrrh r..rrhrrrnrnrrrn.hr-rl-rrnrrrrl.rrrr PhrrM1hrrFrhl•M1hh rFl~rhrrM1hhNhPrM1hM1~r1•hhNrhrhrrhhhNrrl~.r f • • • • • • • O • I < • LN T A T U• P e N P T P 2 J \ T 2•hT • N LL rJ t O \TN OOPT \P\ O Y( 0P• iN•\P O'Oe0 r \N T•Wy •[ T\O \ VNO\T•.Iw Tit PJK Tr PON_ N U T w \OYP mONNwVP ~\ NNPP\6f p Z P Nr1 \ \.4\pN•N \\ \\064 \J \0\ P • \40 •V{•N\0 V bNW00~•J .•N •f wi A W• O Z whWYW 6Aa.1\NW ••~ M\ O\ Nt 4 •\ i •O••WN\U6V4 V \~u6\\N Y \r P Jey lu N ~J~V4Wm06na a1N pY ~N ON IW~ 1 N NP4 NP6 N6 OJ QTJW TJJIPWI111 i1W 6\Z Wm a10 aYU 4m OP YN JP ¢IP O 4R644GN•• 6/-mWTPNiNO wY4• WW •OYPOJOJ 4WW4a N pp WuON•NNNU mf0< PW 1\h wI~N2\I~ IZ72~T~1 tJ J\ » NOI.•VO•u06 IWYtII O( l4 N LCN JYNS YO.2\O N400000>4' bVrUON SIfW O WrfZP•(4 Ywf 2YT 6i OYti N NTS ae6YYOh10 ONZU Y4WN¢ SY4WM IOJaPaaWN6<P RwDU[KNSOM02 ti2FFUT•'i6N fZOh2Y0•• 00006L< >LLP FV6LL• 2SaNOOI ZV ZMp NI i O••PNDNDpw ONPP<NV F< Wi ZYN O(F<JWW YNFFM aV >SJY4 J JO~JUiSa 42JJ}UTS~t22 • 4i NJwulm WJWR OONLJZOwIW \aWZO OTOZPWRNwOOLJOJO Pwi JFLWw>S20 <SYVWTYrD >VYe1WSW~SmJ=•PO~ITYOSrUpV• PLLrJm YN:N=Fa y2J 2<O=tF ONCJVV•YNhw t f• U„O Om2J ~_V L<1..220YJOLN >•2M•uV Ha >JONPU » iY2m2MCORZJ> 7JJJYJ J NFONNttVOi 7Z •-~6ZOw Z~W2< SN•nZW•wWJfYWaWJU•L N1YLL TJM1Q>fa wN t WYJWOt:>:aYfpRw f, ~r<NN ~ Ow 4 aN V1L JN0>CNOarO! O 00 fZ•2 y< T<VPrf 2•U V • V M N J •Si W hMV•• 2 2r 2Y2> N w ~ Y ~O O YV4•[ O JW b_• T < P<Y . > > VF M O ~ _ 2i0 • y is L O LL OS J Nf• VN OOZU M JW • O On Ow L WV ••OTOj JN 2 RV W OS LWO SQN p N4JN Q J U • ¢ ~t 4~<V 42N >•fWNJ Z hNN NA W• i Y2Z> OW WOWY JM L 6W NOY WyY2iDy~O NWJJ{Y~jj < Y r0>Qt FN yVNM $rWLL ')SWY <fM iSMW6lWU )\UZYLJS~H~YY D24 •i ••Y'16 UiOU J •20 OSaW Jip OY>MwyOW i W yJZW lMOW L'JNJiO}•h YW• NWN •<O ffW i Ni 00 WN42< •tlW•90JV J StN<O< LLDU • Ji {W L 6 OWW •NO ONOW• <N ~••U 4•J YD •~SOJN<00 1(i •W`NN <V N Y • FN NWLSNff J<• rZNN< 1 O YLOW ViW Sf •~< • pi•iZNN••W YJ {wWiW •p iON2 iy0UN2•[SYZ NY NFNWNW yILM• 6ML000OQi<YWU 1f2i4WNY0 J<t<ONSMWNZIYDY~ W7WN{. 'JY MhYY000WWi<N!- U C[J6N920VUOJJiUWLlOJ<fOiNtW2>06N?Olyi •YfY <i2M>Y'Yii WWOOOOJ> •jiii« OtJJtii«WWMNDOO JY f « UWWWWWNMMO iiLi22iLMMNNN••1T'lY •[Il l[•[•fJJJJJJJJJJJJlL iitltillLiiii PO•urf•<NTNONrhONNPOPNMONNOP.•TNT•TOONP pOMThN{NNOPPT TrTTTPOPfOON•VNOTPMMNN•NTIrmO•N•TOr •NOhOD<NOP•00 NOOTNOf•N< OPT0000<Tm~NT<TOOhN000<001 NNyPhr<•0•uPOF NT MNTT T NP T PN M PNPPM TPTPNMP NNTTN N TTI~ 9 ~: <. E L i .• moNrNON eNNNpmmrM1O oTmmmmNNONOpNTm ore =ab NoomPmpmpmNh ~ ~ - f +r.: ni.i . .o •izeer o+r eo ruin ~.im~ma~n N \• • iVN mJm m JJi JN aNaPnTm T bnOrvNaF P n N w N N y r w d mN N NwN N w Y•¢ \• F V -~ m i w N •T• W• O• j• • .~ •O• f JNd mVN.YF mp O•INmJNdFm TJ N d n rNTVN • • y .pp y . Wy~aJIV ~i111~yVJVIJ~aay~Of~V1Ni Jy~~JVIiJ~yf nl~~aiV~~J •K• .`FnFFnnn hhnFFnnnPFFnM1 nhnnFM1nnnnnFnFF •¢• OFFFFM1FM1M1FFFFnnnnnnFhnFFFFhhnnFFFFnnM1nM1FFnnnnFnFnFFn •Y• •2• f I V • •• f • f • • I • J Z JW P L VT pN\ \O O f • Za.OP F LL W w \ O¢N L n •\ l I • •a O\b P S Wn a.nw0 Nt'lTN O 2 N , U V • W LdJ\\T PbiZK O 6 JIm \1 j• NONwv f00 am t N N 2 e m • \ S\N •IZ M1>If WO m K O• mm JJVd Ji Vb Y¢n N O¢ J¢F ON ^ LL IN _ OU ¢n lb F uar• N N V M1I V2P IV w2u0 Z Z 'J ¢ Z WL6U VVIKJ ¢LVfV\ V ZIiW¢¢\M1VTn ~ o cN ni uwYnoYNrm dwW . YNif z r o a¢L i w • re ¢~L JJwJFeJw ¢J<J ..< z u\N •J LLY<~ Uif6 WIOrKOO~nJW ry r 0 JJGO WFON~TLmN W~j j 0 Zl 7T2 0 » W> 2FY pON O1NfV 670eLNTOFUOwmN6NeYY 2LL0 •Z• •O• fNY.p O¢wOYVJWTO2NOp¢NN wmJm ~M WmWWL FFSwU pWYNNwJ2ZOOW 6Fw ¢1- KyWmp¢ mit V <Op •ILL<O ¢LLLL 2JUp2J Y.<LL¢wWb~ O•LLI• f i0 miT Op¢f O~~•OVO •Y np<pFnN OF p 6 FGw fP V6JFJV wJ >2N Z¢ SrW O 10 Z¢ ¢WNMF wf 1~i0 Sz mYnN VNILJ mJF FUDJ JK 2nY10 wSf TiittO J¢YVm¢vZl mO O'U i2N;WY wF.n iu WiJ02fLL Ow W7 OZNWJ w•J2NZK wL2Nrvw2mZOwpLLwi NUOSm~Wi1YiV f<m2 •NM1~;ZN10L M1FnuIOZF~ZM1mOJVOZOWZ N LL •O• wIK <Y ON9 TOY ~JY• yL12¢Y VSJ¢pOU<w7.92JNFm n« ¢ NU<mf 2¢6 OV fJN O V aJmZNWf rGy>1- hf I-2N pZJ N fLL U •i• LL;7TO[uZw •¢Y NJ V>OK¢ YO•Z b¢•u J'n N¢M16 f Y unJN 6FY LK ~u ¢wYL2VNm~ NLLf rLL W¢ ¢ • U wJJwiN yOy Zur<\ u2 L •V >O>¢ \ p M¢ 0 ~ t}JK¢ip<¢wf mi J¢6f00 Nr,NN¢CbNOTO<Z¢f Nn2N¢6UOL • _ • 1 J JNM1 U V < 2 2 • n Y- W FI U 2 F22 U LLCU r V NUI z z pa u ~ .. ; .. L z w a 1 rc i M1 V F7 T f LLNTO ZV 2 F Oi N S FpfFO LL VNW Wi O li¢ iJ N 2 O WJ V< SJJ Z NWNW 2W e0 y 7 t9 F' J Ul MOJ ~ Z 20 O LJU00 lOn 1 z : x.J fpwYT~ ¢i.+..uT .z y 2NN wf U 20 Im ~V¢TV OS¢ZNU OSILJ SW i i < i iz • • Np NzwMW 2 ~ <Tp fwTZZ<K - - poWOe fI 2 Y1L W<~ wNN JnYIOWY> M<YWOWM1NW¢ pU VONZhO<WZ2J p ¢~-6ii yNLLM¢OtUfwiFWNJ2v<6JOL~[j0<HrtO}yYjW<~W7000¢TYV6RS • 9NW00 iY2Y~[YLZKJWwInOJOVIUVOVON22iFwNVUK •JffNY b • 0 7mi2N Ilf¢ OFf poONN<Tf Hp0JS o20uJi <OH KFfu < • • • JN:f<¢• • p'O MT WO Yp2~2Vi¢YUU<NW¢Oyi2VW •F M2 •<J< JW¢O •Y¢UU •W OZM1<NN Fl2 OJ ¢¢6WJY WY • = N~<i• IWNSNw¢O[•.Of 6U •i Wi X00 NJ •¢W> WWWIINF •~ • o yf ~ONNrmOLLNWWW iWf ¢YJWK~KNSYNNiWN< hfCOOpWNFOW• i• JLL¢Yn>TLNI-O_O_21_O_Y1•W __V_V_J• LWZSW__ _ __ OOY ¢06M1WLLVNONnUVJ F ¢NZOOeJO JYOiTV<L i Of Wt < ifW JS« YWYOOOOOL¢¢ fffffW Y.i 1f f.•VVVSNI •Z• IiZiL2iA000LLLL¢6CL6LLL6LYK¢K¢L'K 6 L'¢P¢¢KNNNNNNNNNNNN •6• TOOFNN00NypNViNNNNPONhEn Nr.IPONwn.OPTONNNNOniTNO O.4NFF •O• •O• NiiTFJJiTOiOFOFOnNJNIOm<dNNyp<Ni myOMbOmJhrOTPNP¢ON OOOmm NPmOdTd O NIOLNm'YTObmyNPryN N ONmPNNNmN¢bIOMT ; 2: „ ^ O m PNTNPNPTNTNTTTN NNOPIyI •NTT ryw0 T OTOONN 1 •>• .. :. .. ;Y "~ :: ' c b ~ E oo~~oaoma~.mmm ~~ o~ . : ~ N 2Y <1 i PJFU~ m ~. NarvM: ~ Y aNFO I . 1 a ° ~ Ne m iF .Y ~ .~ ~-NrNN ~ w.r . . aN ¢Y <r a m ZY e; r m Y Y rY 01 Y Y i Y n zY Y i ~ .o• Nahmwm TI NaFmPONrvN • w1~~lJ~ JIVIIJMNNwN mhMMNY~iw ¢I hFFhFFhhFFFFF FFhhhnFnF ¢• Y ONYhhhhnFFNFNFFFFFFF NFFhFhFhF f• •2• __ • !! 1 • __ __ • • 2 rt a m u o ¢ a Y \ \ • U N • F 2 rv\ Z a FN O am P F < V Y \ ^1 W 2 W q\ N W FO Np q J 2 ti OC • ~ 2 \JaN FHV WN JI 2N 4F Y a<rv e V Y U\V " mIN\< KN •b< <F 04 p O P 1 UU N 2Y~ n K o\,+ Z I WJJ 2 VO J¢¢< • FON b~7 I •~[ KO bNWJ r ~ ~wWNW ~-< OO YO• IWVn NYn 4 YY. w20 _ WmfoO ~-YO .~ POJ o• r1 >f NN dIN F'F OL¢ OFZ mUF FVJUW Or YYWZ2 V 2NJNU f ~IZww M1 +IOO ZL ZYi OW20 w h m wNw fJU FZ90b0 W YW O ISn 212 aO Fm Z 20NY>ONOV 600Y9 •~N 06 F~+< LO u Y p02Jph2p2N IZ YJ ¢J~pJn o1-2 OJ 2]FWWJ i1 LLNLLf C NNZwJJP O iii n o¢> WJ M Ip~ni « o>o n'a~gn¢N¢p JNf>Ow00 •oNSOfxa< i i ~ Y • ~ i z N i i J 2 6 J o a <w ~ > x `I~ co i~ LL rr - VU 2N2 W w 9 W 2 ~ p• •¢n YZ 0 SUS 2200NFw EIN JL VLL Jr 2< L JWNS Y • NN <~JeV tN <ZJ<¢ 16Tf <n ~ j NJhOeZ MMF<>Ww00 OOff<ZON V¢VN V<m 2i4YY 1'•W6 OW Y • WWUYO a WIW< 72 6Y i OUO[Jf 6lV WNW Y t [ • 1 IL Y. ILSSN • NpNYb a0[Z Sri .O Z ~J ~ 232 O LL n0< y2 1 1 JJJWWWO~hhW qZ wON< •~Zi p Y 2LZ WJY[W\ptWW > fWewW Y¢ •W• IZ• UVVFF62~006w2 •WhJ J7WfZq¢Sm¢NUNJS C[FNOO NN1tN WNF¢N ' •2• MNMNNN/ iF FFY1'F90J » YY2lZl;YN •Y FFPNFOPTIaNN II~IOagO hTPl nn Nl~lq Pq ~TF OT i d gN O NA O Y01 • TINT e g e ~p N aNNIO l i10 •;Y Y NNgN qNe gNgT M qq N ~ >Y 9 U1'1'Y VP't{ANGHV CUGAMVNIiA STAFF REPORT - DATE: June 2, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council "~ Jack lam, AICP, C1ty Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Deek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITTNG BIDS" FOR THE ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT AT THE NORTH TERMIMS OF HERMOSA AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM RSSESSMENT DISTRICT FUND 84-2, ACCOUNT NO. 95-4637-7043 RECOIiEibATION: It 1s recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Alta Loma Store Drain Assessment Dlstrtct 84-2 Stone Drain Replacement and approve the aitached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subiect protect plans and specifications have been completed and revierred by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction 1s 541,917.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for June 9, and June 16, 1993 N1th the hid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 24, 1993. Respectfully subm ed, Nilliam J. O'Ne1 City Engineer NJO:LRB:Iy Attachment cc: Purchasing 1~ RESOLUTION N0. 9-j ~ ~l 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancba Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Alta Loma Store Drain Assessment OT Strict 84-2 Storm Drain Replacement". BE IT PJRTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 15 hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially 1n the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, San Bernardino County, California, directing th15 notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk 1n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 24th day of June 1993, sealed bids or proposals for Lhe "Alta Lama Storm Drain Assessment District 84-2 Storm Drain Replacement" 1n sold City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must 6e made on a fona provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the Alta Loma Storm Drain Assessment 0lstrict 84-2 Storm Drain Replacement" PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that 1n accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cade, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 3, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and eat less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages far holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Dt rector of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center 11 Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 911, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticea6le occupation to apply to the ,joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent 1n the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or 8. Mhen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training an an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of h15 contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered apprentices or journeymen 1n any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and 1f other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the. employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract if the same 1s awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance cf the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (1005) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been Tssued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of Lhe Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 1000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work Ts to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copt es of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535.00 said f35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreinbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of matli ng charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the CoMractar may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reiect any and all bids. Dy order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 2nd day of June, 1993. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 or ATTEST: y er ADVERTISE ON Nednesday June 9, 1993 and Nednesday June 16, 1993 CITI' OF H.AXCHO ~ L'C:1JI0\'G.a r ,,, STAFF REPORT '~' -~-~. ° ; - - ~ ~r °, DATE: ,lone ?, 1993 ~\i f T^: '4ay ~r anA MemSers of the City Council ~~" Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager . FROM: 'di111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: RECOh1MENDATION TO REJECT ALL B[OS AS NON-RESVONSCJE A'~D AUTHORIZE THE RE-ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INV iTING BIDS" FOR THE RESURFACING OF 7HE EQUESTRIAN RINK AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND BERYL STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM p,0. R5 RED HI LI_ ANO HERITAGE REDEMPTION FUND, ACCOUNT N0. 90-4637-9221 RECOMIfNDATIDN: It is recommended that, pursuant to General Specifications, City Co~.mc'1 reject all bids as non-responsive for the subject Capital Improvzment ?reject and approve the attached resolution authorizing the fity Clerk to re-advertise the "No cite Inviting 9ids ." ;ACkf,R011N9/ANALYSIS On~y one Sid was received and tM s Sid was sub Stan *,ialiy over t"e budgeted amount for the project. 'herefore, it is recommended that the hid be rejected and the oroiec t'he re-advertised. the funds for this project are budge*.ed for in the 92/93 Fiscal Year. Due to the `act that the bids sere rejected and the project is being re- adver±ised, it is not possible to encumber these funds this fists' /ear, Therefore, Council's authoriza tf on 's requested to rea pproo ria*.= and expend these necessary funds in the 93/90. budget. Respectfu~ly submitted, ~i ill ism J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEHad Attachment 14 RESOLUTION NC. ~, j ' / d D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS ApID SPECIE iCATIONS FOR Th'E RESURFACING OF THE EQUESTR LAN RINK AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY DARK, LOCATED AT THE SDUTHW EST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND 9E RYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DI REC iING THE CI?Y C.LE RK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE RIDS 'd HEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presen teA by the City of Rancho fuc amonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Resurfacing of the Equestrian Rink at Heritage Community Park, located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and ?e ryl Street". BE 1T FU R?HER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for Aoing the work specift eA fn the aforesaid plans anA specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho fucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IC HE RE RY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk ;n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P,M. on the 23rd day of June, 1993, sealed bids or proposals for the "Resurfacing of the Equestrian Rink at Heritage Community Park, loco teA at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street" in said City. Rids will be opened and pubafcly reaA imnedia tely in the off ice of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. bids must he made on a form provideA for the purpose, addressed to *.he City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the Re su rfar.ing of the Equestrian Rink at Heri to ge Community Park, iota teA at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street". P REVA?LING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance w+th the provisions of California labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles t and Z, the Contractor is regni red to pay not 'ess than the aene ral preva it inq rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the pobl is work is performed, and not less than the general prevail inq rate of per diem wages far holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Direcror of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has deterr„ined such general prevatiing rates of per ~is^~ 15 wages. Copies et such prevailing rates of per niem wages are on *ile in the office of the City C1 ark of the ~-i ty of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper leyei, Rancho Cucamonga, California, attd are available f,o any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such de termi na ti ons to he posted at the job site. 'he Centrae for shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five Aollars !425.001 for each laborer, workman, nr mechanic empl oyeC for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic ;s paid iess than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinhefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcont^actor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter o71, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly 7nden to red apprentices may be emp7 oyed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777,5, as amended, requires the Contractor or suhcontrac for employing tradesmen in any app rentTCeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ~a do of aVp rentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to ;ou rneymen in such cases shall not be less than one •*.o °ive except: A. ~4hen unemployment in the area of coverage by Lhe joint app ran ticesMp committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior ±o the request for certificate, or 3. When the number of apprentices in training Tn the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is reps ac tng at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. 'When Lhe Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight iou rneymen. the Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established For the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registe reA apprentices or journeymen in any app renticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shalt comply with the requ;remenis of Sections 1777.5 and 1717,5 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, ani Is other reouirements may he ohta+ned °rom the Director of Industri at Relations, ez-officio th •. Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, cr from the Divi Sion of Appren tices h+p Standards and its branch offices. `-;ght ~8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for alt workmen empl oyeA in the ezecu Lion of this contract and the Con t•actor anA any subcentrac for under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of Cat ifo rota having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the labor Code of the State of California as emended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dolt ors ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or an,Y subcontractor vnAer him, upon any of the work beret nbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which sa+d laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to '.abor more than eight (8) hours in vi oiation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel anA Subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work require6 by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective barga+ning agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The AiAder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equ at t0 at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of sdTd Aid a5 a gua Man tee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarder to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's :heck, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract Lo the next lowest bidder, the amount cf the lowest bidder's secu rf ty shall be apps led 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Aifference between the tow b1A and the second lowest b+d, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest biAAer. The amount of the hcnd to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shalt be one hundred percent (100%) of Lhe contrac' price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (100'x) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of rt aims for any materials or Supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to he done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, anA Lhe Contractor will al se he requ+red to furnish a certificate that he carries cannensa Lion fnsu ra nce covering his employees upon work to he Aone under contract which may he entered into between hfm and the saiA City of P,a ncho Cucamonga for the construction of safd work. No proposal will he con5ldereA from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall poss e5s a C1 a55 "A" License lfeneral Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California business anA Professions Code, Section 7000 a*.. seq.) anA rates and regul atlons aAOpted pursuant thereto at the Lf me this contract 15 awa r~!e^. 17 The work is to he done in accordance with the profiles, pan s, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, fal ifornia. Copies cf the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535.00, said 535,00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of E15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will Se required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracteC to he done Sy the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorizeA securities in lieu of monies withheld !performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DateA this _ day of iq_, PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of ln_ ayor ATTEST: ty . er P.DVE RTISE ON JUNE 9 AND JUNE lfi, 1993 i8 crrY Vr' tiANCriU CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilitam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Barrye Nansor., Senior Ctv11 Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGIN:EMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDIN6 OF OYERNEAD UTILITIES FOR TRACT 14192-1, LOCATED ON HELLMAN AVENUE SOUTH OF NINETEENTH STREET SUBMITTED DY HI% DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, URA-015 RECOMNEMDATiOM: It is recommended that the Cib Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrouMing of a portion of the overhead ut111b lines on Nell man Avenue from north of Monte Vista Street to north of Nineteenth Street and on Nineteenth Street from Hellman Avenue to 175' east of Hellman Avenue and authorize the Mayor and the Cib Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Developer (H1x Development Corp.) has completed the under9rounding of the existing overhead utilities fronting his project (TR 14192-1) as required by the project conditions of approval. He 1s now requesting a reimbursement agreement to recover a pro rata share of the undergrounding costs from the adjacent properties directly benefiting from the under9roundtng, which is consistent with Cib policy. Staff hes nvtewed and concurs with the undergrounding cost data supplied by the Developer and the distribution of the costs to the benefit parcels as contained in the reimbursement agreement. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the CTb Clerk's office. The properties affected by the agreement were notified by mail 30 days prior to tonight's Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, NJO:BH:~h ~~~~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~J~I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVTN6 A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERGAOUNDIN6 OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED ON HELLMAN AVENUE NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET TO NORTH OF NINETEENTH STREET AND ON NINETEENTH STREET FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO 175' EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by H1x Development Corporation, as developer of Tract 14192-1 for the under9rounding of the existing overhead utilities on Hellman Avenue from north of Monte Vista to north of Nineteenth Street and on Nineteenth Street from Hellman Avenue to 175' east of Hellman Avenue (URA-015); and NNEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, hes compieted said utility undergrounding; and NHEREAS, the owners of the ad~olning properties Mill share 1n the expense of the utility undergroundlr~g as stipulated 1n seld Reimbursement Agreement. NHEREAS, reimbursement payments free two of the adiacent properties (APN: 202-041-30 and 202-041-65) have been made to the Cify previously as utility undergrounding 1n-lieu fees. NOII, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement t0 record and the Finance Director 1s authorized to disperse to H1x Development Corporation that portion of the previously paid 1n-lieu fees from ad,)acent properties due them per the agreement and refuM t0 the adjacent properties aay excess funds paid as in- 11eu fees. 1 l9 Clmi-341-54 ~ 18 6 1 7 NINEfPtRN SRAPEf Q~1-17 LEGEND ~~-~ g@~PTT PMCPl. ///i// Elf PM('8. x xnxxr 4affi~ffi-19 5 pEffggl_3p 6 ~ ~_~ ~ Oa42~-71 e moral to oaa-o~res 11 mOr011~ N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pRA-l5r TItACP 14192-1rHELLMAN ~` o ~ca`DeG/'FI~ _ ENGINEERINfi DMSION ~~`• """ •,a• a yr nnavr.aav vua.r+..rva.v~. STAFF REPORT DATE: Suns 2, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AI CP, City Manager FROM: Hied Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC POINT OF INTHREST DESIGNATION 93-01 - SAN GAHAIEL VALLEY LABOA ASSOCIATION - Approval to desi gnats the Cucamonga Labor Camp Site, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Aoute, west of Cucamonga Creek, as an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 207-211-81, 18-21, 31, 32, and 34. Related File: Tentative Tract 166d0. R600M~iDS!' IQI The Historic Preservation Commission re co®ende designation of the Cucamonga Labor Camp Site ae an Historic Point of Interest through adoption of the attached resolution. The site in question, which was originally developed during the depression as a Civilian Conservation Corps Camp, is considered to be historically significant because of its original use in housing Italian prisoners of war during the later stages of World War II (19dd-1946). The barrack-like buildings originally built on the property during the depression later housed the 499 Italian prisoners of war gent to the site. The P.O.W.s aided in the harvesting of grapes and citrus during their stay at the camp through an agreement between the Southern Ca liEornla Farmer's Association and the U. S. Army. For Eurthei details regarding the history of the site, please refer to the attached Hia tonic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated May 11, 1993, which inc ludea newspaper articles in which former prisoners of war were interviewed. A Large number of building Foundations and a stand of 222 mature trees remain on the property. With development of the relate8 subdivision of single family homes, all of the remaining foundations and some of the mature trees are planned to be removed. To mitigate the loss of the remaining historical aspects of the site and to retnin the historic significance of the site in perpetuity, the Historic Preservation Commission hoe recommended that all remaining elements be documented prior to removal and that historical plaques be Incorporated into a monument or the entrance walls near the two-guard gated vehicular CITY COONCIL STAFP REPORT POI 93-01 - FD MAZ LTD. June 2, 1993 Page 2 entrances and the main recreation/open space area, with text subject to staff's review and approval. In addition, all mature trees that are removed will be replaced with specimen size trees at a minimum one-to- one ratio, per the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Conditions pertaining to the required historical monumentation and tree removal and replacement will be included with the approval of related Tentative Tract 15540. RZSIORIC PRH~lPATIOII Cd1QSSI0M MTiOP At the request of the developer of Tentative Tract 15540, the Commission held an advertised public hearing on May it, 1993, and passed a resolution recommending designation of the site as an Ristoric Point of Ivterest. Re epectfully submitted, Hrad Hu er City Planner BB:SA/jfa Attachments: Exhibit ^A" - Historic Preeervniion Commission Staff Report dated May 11, 1993 8xhibit ^H^ - Aietoric Pzeeervaticn Commission Resolution No. 93-OS Resolution of Approval W DATE: May 11, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Ple nning Commission FROM: Larry Nende ra ort, AICP, Principal Planner HY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUHSECT: HISTOFSC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 93-01 - SAN GAHRIEL VALLEY LAEOR ASSOCIATION - A proposal to designate the Cucamonga Labox' Camp, a site previously used as a World War II Italian Prisoner of Waz labor Camp, located between Foothill Hou levard and Arrow Aoute, west of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, as a Historic Point of Interest - A1>N: 207-271-07, 18-21, 31, 32, and 34. Related File: Tentative Tract 75540. BACKGROUND: Staff has been working Wit7i Pu Mai Limited Partnership over the past few months in the processing of Tentative Tract 15540 for a 159 single family detached residential development, which is located on the Cucamonga Labor Camp site, used during World War II to house Italian Prisoners of War. Currently, the site ie not listed in the City's Historical Resources Survey, however, staff feels that the historical significance of the ai to history warrants consideration far a Historic Point of Interest designation by the Commission. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Since the time the site was used ae a labor camp, all structures have been demolished with only concrete foundations remaining. The site contains 222 mature trees protected Dy the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The natural slope of the property is roughly 3 percent in a north/south direction. SITE LAND USE, ZONING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: The site is currently void of structures and unoccupied. The property Se designated Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) by the General Plan and Development Districts Map. LAND AND SPECIFIC UESIGNAT IDN3: The land to the north Of the site contains two buildings currently used ae a traffic school and an art gallery and is designated Office by the Foothill Hou levard 6pecific Plan. The property to the south of the site ie developed with apartments and ie designated Medium Residential (B-14 dwelling unite per acre) by the Development Code. Immediately seat of the site Se the Cucamonga Flood Control Channel, which is designated ae a Plood Control land use by the Development !w`! HPC STAFF REPORT PU MAI LIMITED PARTNEASHIP May 11, 1993 Page 2 Districts Map. To the west is t:.a Casa Volante Mobile Home Park, the E1 Chico Market and vacant land, wi;i ch are designed Medium, Medium and Low- MMedium Residential, respectively. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The site gains its historical significance through its unique use in housing Italian Prisoners of Waz during the later part of World War IZ (1944-1946). Originally, the site was used as a Civilian Conservation Corps Camp during the depression, housing workers in the barrack-like Dui ldings on the property. These same buildings housed the 499 Italian Prisoners of War sent to the site. These low escape risk prisoners were used to aid in the agricultural harvests (primarily citrus and grapes) through an agreement between the Southern California Farmers Association and the ^. S. Army. This Facility served as a "stopping ground" for the prisoners ultimate location, Camp Ono in north San Bernardino, which served as the main detention center far the area. Foz more information about the site's history and prisoners' accounts of their axpeziencea, please refer to Exhibit "HPC-2." ANALYSIS: In reviewing the request to designate the Cucamonga Labor Camp site a local HSetorle Poini of Interest, the Covmisaion ahoy ld consider if and how the historical documentation should occur. Several articles (example: Exhibit "NPC-2") have been written about the site. These articles typically include in-depth interviews from ex-prisoners who still live in the area. These articles, combined with what the Historic Preservation staff can still learn from interviewing ex- prisoners who live ir. the area., can serve to provide the necessary documentation for the labor ca nip. In addition, the significance of the site's history could be documented by incorporating a plaque or similar historic monument, with text aubj act to staff review and approval, within the main common open apace area and within the entry walla near the two-guard gated entrances to the site. With construction of the proposed project, all remaining building foundations and other remnants of the Prisoner of Waz Camp will be removed. Over time, the history of the site will be lost without the recommended documentation and plaques. Therefore, installation of the historical plaques will serve to mitigate the lose of the remaining elements of the Prisoner of War Camp. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Hi atorlc Poirtt Of Interest designations are exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15308. This designation is accompanied by a duly advertised public hearing. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Ln Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Pre9ervai ion Ordinance, the following findings are made concerning the designation: Gil HPC HTAPF REPORT FO MAI LIMITED PARTRSASNIP May 11, 1993 Page 3 A. Historical and Cultural Si .ificance: Finding: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: The site in question housed Italian prisoners of waz providing their services in the agricultural productivity of the area during the later stages of World War II, which was both important and unique to the area. Finding: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now raze. Fact/s: During Wozld War II, the use of low-risk Italian pr. isoners of war to aid in the productivity of local agricultural crops took place in this area, as well ae other parts of the southwest United States. With development of the area, this agricultural activity will likely never occur again. Finding: The site is the location of an important historic event or building. Fact/s: The site served as camp for 499 low-risk Italian prisoners of war during the later stages of World War II. The site was used for this purpose for approximately one year until the prisoners were moved to nearby Camp Ono in San Bernardino. This use is unique to the City. RECOlAtENDATION: Staff recoamenda that the Historic Pre6ervation Cov¢niseion forward its approval to the City Council to designate the San Gabriel Valley Labor Aasociatlon Prisoner of War site as a local Historic Point of Interest. Respe/cIS/tf///u~lly submitted, ~y Henderson Principal Planner LJN:SH:mlq Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Site Plan for Tentative Tract Map 15540 Exhibit "HPC-2" - AYticlee Regarding the Labor Camp Draft Clty Council Raeolution of Approval Raeolution of Approval +I ' 4 b ~ U ~ ' ~,~-~ ~ ~ --- `.fit d 2 y ~I~ . -' ~ __f F r _ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ a~~tn' - 1 ~r/E~ ~ ~~ '~~i!____1 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 4 „ _ ~ ~ ,a • ~.. . - -- t ~. :iii f ~ :s; ~ ' ~G ~ ~te~! ~ ~~ ~::= ~ ~ ii 't I~ ! ICI . ~ . ~.y~ r l ~45T [!pY 1! S ~ O, 1 •r ~ it III'I 1~ ~ I ~. ^^ J ~ a~ li if ~ ~ ~' N ~ :;v • ~ :Iilii IIII d ~~I ~ ~~,_. .,• ~; ~~. III r. ~ ,: L I J of ii fc ii u • .i _ ~ ~ -w.. '~ ~ ii o i i f~ i. ~ ~ '' ~ s ~ f ..d ~ ~ ~ i~ ~`k~ i ~. .aw i ~ (]~7 t . ~ ~ ~ ~ • • i ~ ~ ~ } 1 y ` ; ... ._ ~ , ' P 1 1 rR II , p l . ~ ~ {I ~ _ ~ ~ • ~ ~ _ •, ~ il F '-- . i - ~ ! . , ~ ! e ~ , ~ 1 1 ~ ~~lv pppp ~ ~` r ~ ~ '~,,1 ``I~~, I I I • 1 ~ 94 . 4 1 1 1 1 h ` ~ a ~ ~"1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ yi ~ ~ 1 1 ,,,,, r ,,, . " I • v ~ ~ ! N ~ .o ~``~,~ I ~ i I 1 a d i 1 l +, ~~I1 ,~ I ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ' >< ~ 1 . 1 --- ~1 11 1 ..... " _ 1 x''11 11: ~ L• • 1 1 . '~ 1 -=~_ :._ ~~! ._ . . _~ N~ ....... s. ~_., . 131T~~H EX r+ C _~ Cucamonga's Labor Camp Memories of V/U/II Wor Prisoners [3t' T. A Sunderland T here are several ingredlenta to this gory. the wholeolwhlch connimtesa bll of obuure hbtory in the W<st End. The flrat is the San Gabriel Valley 46or Asw<iation, a fih<en acre migrant farm workers camp on Arrow Highway in flan<ho Cucamonga. dust a handful of families Ilve In the camp ell year round. The main Row of tenants. mostlyaingl<men, stares in January during the pruning uawn and ends In autumn with the harvest. The wand eat of ingr¢dlents b e group of Inng time residema of the West ErW and Rialto. and one who has alnca moved to Huntington eea<h. Paul Ludfore Ilvea in Rancho Cucamonga end has for over thitsy- five years. He is probably best known for his bualness. though, Paul's Shae Repair on Archibald Avenue lust nosh al FootAlll. Perry Pugno liven In Rialto in a house he bulls himself. He owns Peny's Elecvic and contacted m build the fins alDelectnc home In Rlello back In the late fihles. Emlllo Pauolatl resides In Huntington Beech with hh wile Penny. Emlllo la an engin<tt for McDonnell Douglas and a member of the American Legion chapter. Joa Galbs Ia a retired electngen who Ilvo In a mobile home park In Rancho Cucamonga. lust crop th<flel4 hom the Sen Gabriel Veliry Labor Au«laR«. J« still hen the Italian/ American dictionary luued m him by tA< War Rellel S<MCa. The last Inpredl<n4 and the one Mrden to locate, Is a n<wsDaptt ankle In the Dally Report. The anginal copy has long siren yellowed and cracked with age. It now eHSb only on mlcrofllm. On the fins Datl< of the Dally Report dattd Saturday. January Z9, 19141a an article teilingolshearrlval olbur hundred end ninety-nine Italian prawn<rs- of-war to a railroad siding In Gueatl. The mm, all established as low euape Halo. were greeted warmlyby theltallan raWena of Cucamonga and Guam. The dlpPing tells of haw many realdenb bled to locate prlwnen hom their home towns In Italy. Other vhouted Inquhi<s about relatlvn back in the old country. Aker roll was taken and ell the men wen accounted ter they were loaded on b«ea. Thry were to be hawed in banacb at a the onginelly used as a CCC cemplClvlllan Conurvati«Coryl during the deyraaian. Ths land was lattt mmed over to the Southem Calibmla firm <rs Au«laslon for uw In the housing of miprant term worker. A decade iota ih< buildings and land would come under the aulhoriry of the Sen Gabriel Valley Labor Aawclation. PeW Ludbrn Pent' Pugrm, Em11in Pauoled and J« Galba were all on those buses. Although they did not yxt realize Is, that day wsa to be o« of the moss ImDOnam In their ilvea The aMVal of the prlwnen to Cucamonga was the product oleo agreement worked out between the U. S. Army end the Southem Callfomle Farmers Asw. The war had brought a ahartage of manpower to the agnculsurai IndmMes of Southern Cel4 (ante. The Farmers Aun. agreed to hove the Dnsoners, provide food, put them to work end compenate them kr their labors. The army agreed to provde secunry. is was a lortunet¢ choice on the pars of the army. Cuwmonya was about as dose to Italy et one could get. Th< lust. inland valley, then a checkerboard of grape vine- yards arW orange groves, bore a great rnemblance to the home country of the ntw anWals. As If that wsa nos enougA. Cuca- monga and Guam were largely Italian communltlea, having been settled al the sum n( the century by Immigrants brim the rmrthem pltdmont region of Inly. San Segundo d'Assl. the Catholic church in 40 F«ehllls Vi¢w Ex ff~ a r~ "N?c-a ~ Guasti, is named and modeled aher a church by the same name in the town of Asu In northern Italy. The c mp itself was a paradfu for the men, Th¢y had all been taken prisoner in the Allied invasion nl North AM<e. Many o(the men had bun In the desert for as long m three years. s me even more. Far the malodty it had been a long time since they had slept in clean sheets or had more then one hot meal a day. Immedlatety bNorc taming to Cucamonga, the prtsonen had bean held at Camp Florence In Arizona along with 27.000 other Italian POWs. At Cucamonga they wen out of the desert and things were a lot feu crowded. As Pavl Lucilora rrcalis, "The food wen out of this world" It did not take the prbon<rs very long to feel m home. II was wiener end the start of the pruniny season. The men worked aide by aide with many of the local Inlfena They would lunch together, ohen with a bottle nl wine supplied by one of the Iamillea. The men even stopped In Ihelr homes baton returning to the camp at night Emlilo P<KOlan tells olhow on at lent one ocoNw when they retnmed to camp the pdwnen were more sober than (heir guards. But It wee these encounnrs, m the llalds and nom<s o! residents of the Wan End, that these men met Iheirhture wives and Mends. Lila Inside the camp was taken up with prsoner activities. A soccer teem was organUed and games were artanged with e Mexican league. There were also games against teams hom Camp Ono, the main detention cennr in San Bernardino, The men also plnved the American games o! baseball and volleyball. Upon the arrlual of the Inteme¢> the camp was whhout lanb staging. A number o/the men ut forth and planted shrubs and plena. Evening and nigAttlme hours were taken up with mera• Ikon Dakar games. Prboners were homed in Cucamongs Mr about a year. although soma of the men were there ter a much charter period of Om¢. All the men were <veMUally irand<rred to Camp Ono. • larger and much moo or ganired camp In Iwnhem San Bemardino heaslne about 1.500 men. But dnpite their removal hom Cucamonga, the men wen tlnued rda0omhlps. Emlho Pawolatl had already ma Penny elen<o wd Pavl Ludlore was ueing Ms future wife. Sarlna, as much as possible. With the larger number of men at Camp Ono there wu a wider varlery otwork to do. Some al Ih< men want to worN mending twb and working In the motor pool Orhen wem tg work outside the temp, once again workin9ln the holds or in hoapltel+. TheSan Bernardino Ciulc LIgM Opera came to the camp end recrvleed nngen for IhNr chorus The men alw formed an orchntra end held large dan«s. Weekend pow were he quentlY 91ven and Iml as oho the Oriwnen went over Iha fence. $urprisinglY enough then wen never any euapes. It was at Gmp Uno Chet the men were glum an opponanlry to change their stoma Ahar tht wccearlul Invasion of Italy by A91ed lorcea, Muswllnl was depoud. Italy surrendered and Menhell Plevo Badoglio was put In chafe of the new govemm<nt. Badoelb IAen In tom declared war on Germany and Italy became one of the Allied power. Gweral Ebenhower made en egreo- merit with the Italian leader allowing pro- vlomly captured man ro etgn en nHh of ailagtaoc<. The prlwnen were tachnicallY then conddered lotion wldlen in servke to the Amerlun Army. but br reawns never IuIIY explained the men Intoned In the Ilnlted Ststes were still <onlfned as prlsonertop wsr. Pen of the hewn mfgM have bean the varied polltl<al beliefs of the soldiers. Same were lacu4 sell d<vond to Muuolini. ~n ~T J IY //~G~ +~ ~\ Winter 1982 4~ Photngrapha sham some o(ehe actieitin oJpnaoneo ar Cucamonga P.O.W. camp during World War Tmo. Phoroa by Phil Sawyer. BUSINESS 8 PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE: DooY wait For luiMSS io 6e1 Better MAKE IT BETTER with Ihs NOWBYPrdHEISNBOR ,`~ (714) 987.5936 ~L-~'~ P,O. Baa 277 Alta Loma. CA. 91705 • let us Bend your business Dv olaung yow personal mwlallen wilb every new hnm~ awne•in yow area eats mpnln YCf ~96p • New customers momM1ly • Low Cosl •••R~gb R<:urn • Retulls verilrable •••Proven success • Best buy for your >drerhimg Dollar • For inlormalion on new customers eyoy monln ull or wnb us today! GROW WITH YOUR COMMUNITY '00;,9A ~Y~ Y Q oO •~ C ~g s~ W ~F V o Othma WR[ paRl[am and [RII e[hera W<R mmmun6u and aorialista. EaN group mrmained a diRerent W<w d what was happening and tensions were high. In order not to take any chances the army kept the men quartered and under wcudry. Other ac[Ivitiea were al[o organized for the men. All day group picnics went to the beach and the mountains Dances at the camp got better as the orchestra end tAe imtrumenb Improved. As the mwnspeoDle n San Bernardino and surrounding cities became accustomed to the Dreunce of the men more people came to the events Reality came crashing back in Apol of 1965 when the war in Europe ended. Ac cording to the rules o1Ne Geneva Commtion the men bad to be returned m halt'. Artangemenu were worked om and pro- mites made Eight months larerthe men leh on boats horn San Pedra for the Mp home. Within months their prospective brides bllowed Once back in Italy the worst learn o! the men were <onflrmed The coumry had been devauated by war. The land was in ruins, the < nomy i complete chaos. Penny Biencaoarrtved In Italy within a yesr end a belt o/Emilio s rttum. Theyw<re mertied In Emlllo's home town, in the original San Segundo d'Aati. The aHalr was so large. Emlllo recalls, that the town had m be cloud down far the day. Within two years nl their return d« Gaiba, Peul Lucibre and NANDCRAFTED OAK MODULAR BEDROOM SET • Heatlboartl e Plallorm • CeOinete e Lpnc erldpa Sale Price S2799~ DESIGN YOUR OWN SYSTEM 1280 W. 7th STREET UPLAND ~ 982-3212 South d Mounlangreen Center EXCITING DESIGNER FURNISHINGS OF HAND-CRAFTED OAK AND WALNUT EXPLORE THE MOST UNIQUE FURNITURE STORE IN THE VALLEY. Cx4I'3 ,_~r-~,,~_~, INTERIORS dz FppmgN vhw 31 Pent' Pugw were married to Heir Amerban wives also. Once married to Am<Hfen dtixena she mm gained prelmed status forimmlgration back Into eM cwntry. Paul ludbra rammed with his Wie and set up houseFeeping in Cucamonga. Emilio Paacelatl was IIWng In Cucamonga and working in an aummotive garage. J« Gaiba wea alw back Pmt' Pugno was living on Me Vernon in San Bernardino. The man burned fhemulw Wth the dual oaks of raising lamllin and starting careen last March. ever lhirtyei9M Y<an ahtr heir initial arrival In Cucamonga, there wee a reunion !or brmer Italian POWs. There ere over w<nrygve men now IiWngin Calilomia. horn San Fran<ISCO to San Diego. They all wear ihlir past proudly. AN<r gaining his Htirmship In 1951 Emlib Pauolati went to work for Aeroj<t as e r«Fet I«hnician. He went on to Trl<dyne and then to McDonnell Douglea where he works ww. WhileMwaa living in Cucamorga Emilio announced thl weekly"Italian HOYP radio show on KASK a I«al radio sbimn Hr did it for HNlen years, hem 1919 to 1961. In 1965 Emilio moved his family. which by thN lime included a wn and a daughter. la Sa[ramrnso lac Emlllo'• lob. Th< Pescolatya have since returned to Huntington Beach. In addition to Dlcturn and other mementos horn his days in Cucamonga and Camp Ono, Emilia pill has copies of the original camp rou<n. Paul lu<ifora lives In the fledhill nttlon nl Rancho Cucamonga. Me wea In hla flrat shoe repair shop eighteen yeah before moWng to hie Dresent location. Paul Is wdh known m Poncho Cucamonga, both for the yuelity of hb work and hiutandingua long time member al the community. Paul has s daughter, Marla, who Ilvn in YUOipa with hat husband. There la also • wn. Paul Jr. long lime rekAenn of Cuumonga recall the lush vegnable garden Paul would annually plant In the smell pint of land edlacent m hb buliding. Since th<d<ath of Sarine two yeah ego, fAe land het gone m Welds J«Gaiba. aNar Working a en electddan st A<rojet as well as br tM raliroed and l.ockhlcd, b now retired and IIWng In Cuumwga. J« was never pert d the military In Nonh AM<a. ether M wa a ciWllen smplw<e `millnrind for hb know ledge" Although he Wu to Mve DHOdry as e dWllan durlrn a ntnat he was posed war In the cMoa ANer nrving a commanding olflur far the POWs In Cucamonga. J« Went m Camp Orw br a brllf period He wu thm rc ualgned to K<Ilogg Ranch (now CaI Polyl where he cared for Arabian hones. J« remembers German POWs coming to rl~ place him whm he leh shat the Woo Perry Pugno mired recently horn hla elecMul contra<tln9 Ousln<u which he has pseud on to his wnimlaw, Perry and hh Wh continue to Ilw In their Mme in fllalb and Perry «<uplu Almulf atlM gull couru. perry hu tMee chlldnn end flue grsndchlldnn. Hb wn. Perry Jc, b • doctor and heads emergency uMns at fll«nlde Commumry M«pitei. He abo has tWo Mughten. Dla« end Nancy. Although he was never at the camp In Cucamonga, Alceo Vecchio was at Cemp Ormwhen he ma hie (stun wile. Alceo was on • tank crew end was wounded at Tobmk He wu later deconled for bravery. He telh dhow he was abk to win enough money In poker game at Camp Ono b buy a Model T Ford. He n9iatered it In the name ola friend and kept It parked at a gas nedon near tM camp. Alcor now lives In Claremont with hD wile. They Mve two chlMren. Alceo la co ow«r of EHwanda Grape Company. Iron foly. he open g«s to tAe labor Aun. to ncmlt workin Alceo hn Just recently ntircd as aces dhemor for the Amerkan Vouch 5«cer Organlxetlon (AVSOI. Durfn9 parts of 1M Year the camp on Artow Highway b largely duen<d. The diatom hum olcan or Fwthlil Blvd. can be Merd. TM bartadu en now subdivided Into smell rooms br Wnden. WorN crew+ prepue tM camp each Year for the arrival of IM get wave of mlpnnn dmin9 th<proning uuon In Lnwry. Soma of the Ugna nl apthdry are gone but the sure nl labor al the camp nmelna. N ['X ~'~ ~ i~ i ' [ ~ f~L _d ` Winter 19gY 1~ Emilia Pasolati propoan a ro«t al she reunion o7lormer lrolian Pdaanen of Warheld loaf March Photo By T. A Sunderland ~~.;F ~:~ • 1 Y %"°n$~39~°~yyyyy~yy ~ ~~c ~tr~s~°~~ 9y5~ h~Y'JZ-gSuc-~3 id~~ ~~; ~9~g9~3E§~aqgf~ T ~ ~; 3~F~~~~s~z33 ;, 5a ~~~'s~a~:: s~k~ ~ of W F~~3~~~ `~~~~~ .~e b.~$g ~a ~j~l 5qr 3c° c~3'6s~$!3w 9d ~~ a~~ 7 m ~53`$~yy~~' `'Yg S '~ °~sa~Ld ~~S~ ro 99f LL ~e S Fsa'c .,4~~ 3~ a ~ $Q YJ y IIy ~} xj ~= oEi8 ~EE5~3~ib R 5 fi F98~ 939 ~~5 5 ~. a ~~a~3~~F~~~ ;. .~~ ~~~a~;~~~~5 sQ Bpy9a w gggg ~ya7Q'!9i '~ ~~ ~~~1~~~~~'E~7S $ a~~ a ~~~ ~ ~~~ tf~~f t,~~, EX`S-"'v-:~~-a JJ ice, CAMP: A Ne W Ma RYaat his . 7Mttnrt d the problem 11v in the poliueal leaning of eb MtnapBnt~o~then werc~ were Fase1M. t::vot- •rert Cortununuts. Au these ~~ aM auU oth<n r grottq uw the war from a ggUtermt point of view and they argued bitterly. The Antmaoua were esncerWted by m agrerntent between Qlw luban and the Amenran govenunmta ' M Shortly after the capture of traps m North Africa the ~ r21Wed forces invaded IWy, which quickly aurnndesd. uewbm was ousted and replaced by Marshall Pie ,'8adoguo. In ntum, Bado6lm delraretl wu m Gemwny i In an agrecmmt between Sadaglio and Gen. Dwight D. '£uenhowm. pptured 1Wun troop were allowed to 'like an oath a(Wegwtrn b the UmteO Sutn. Although the mm. after liking ine atA, were techm- ;ca0y free. flit United States nWned custody. 'they '~ were hotued antl given JoDS for wMCh they wen paid. 7Te amroversy over nkmg the oeN of allegiance ~aharpened Dater feeling. When PaxolaU, along wth a ;number of other pnaonm. volunteered b COOpenu. .Sae Army gwckly removed them from the camp He7P roe Rarraen Although the ulumate desUnauon of the mm wu Camp Ono m San Bernardra,199 of them wen taken m Cucamonga ere part of a deal between the Sathem GII- fomla Farmer's Aun. and the U.S. Army. The war Wd nueed a ahonag o! mmpower ro the ' agrtculturai tndustnn of Sourhem Califarnn. TTe tan mar's aasanuon agreed m hoax the pneonero. provrdt fad. Dut them to work and ampmsate them for their Idhors. The Army agreed b provide the amunty in or- der to nununtu Ne DroDlema the Army chore men who . had proved themRlvea m br bw-escap risks. PeealaU was one at those choem. ' The pnsonen amved on th<mornrng of Jan. 28. 19N, at a nurad ndtng m Guxu. a Wgely 1 Wian communt- :uy tact eolith of Cucamonga. Many of the local rendenta of Guasu, wort of whom had tmmrgralod to the Umtetl Stites lust a few years Barber. tamed out io gr<et tM amvmR Dnaners. • Handshakes and kisses were exchanged and mgtpnea • made about relauves back m IWy PascolaU met a man from the same province as be. Sy the time Ue tart of the pnsonen wy oM lW Van and unto the waling buses the entlrt group had begun singing 1 W ran folk songs. Priwaen 9iaaioa Ldla Luras. 86. Is the widow of~Hevy Luras. the grandam of the Southern Caldomta Partner's Aean. during this period Llla was ala olh<e manager at the camp She remembers the Dnsoners still artging as they came Into the camp The men were green an opportunity m tamil4nR themselves with the camp. Several days of ram proht- 6ned them from working m Uri helde. They spot the days eaplonng. At one point an alarmed ghee oHlcer " from nearby Upland Came b the Army upWn m charge, and vose0 hw concern aDOm flit wmdenng Dneoners. Paacolou rememhen the capWn. who spoke wan a stutter. asaunng the slice alhcer there woultl De "man but not leer pnsonen Wck at th• camp m lime to D< fed. AetuWly. the Anny could not have pinked a Diller place than Cucamonga It was the closest to luly one could get. Around the turn of the century Nerc ha0 been a loge mllux of IWUn tmmtgnnu. The climate and Ne surrounding topography arc aimUar b 141y. and the ground was fertile Vineyards were planed and wlnenea sort (o9owed. The small sown of Guam, a goad w Homeland Found~~ part o/ wDich V now liken W by the Onurio Interr* doM Airport, was origlnaBY R[Ued u an IWim ale} ny. l7fe W W Gtholk ChWCh, San S<gnndo D'AaU. a} mDUturcrepUCa of a chumJt N narNVn iWy. - Thls mvironmem, mmbmed NN the warm tettfi lion of Ne local Carman and people. made the pnsott¢n quickly feel of home. Jmuary was tSe peak of the pnmitlg Beason. WiN the erM of the rain the mm ware gmctly orga• nized orb cork groups and taken om Into Ne flelde ev- ery morning. A mihtaryguard was xnt Mth exh grotp but then was attic need for one. Out m the fields tDe pnsonera worked ode Dy sgle wtN N< tarmerc. many of them Italim, arM Uteir Innuhes. At noon meals wen Rived by the women. Often then was a Wltle of wine pseud around Efforts at hoaptlauty often IM b romance. PasalaU wsa invited m the hoax of the man rte nod met from his proWnn whin he got off the trun. '"Chi man Dad a meCG' Patsalau ord. "Thu k now 1 was able b reface Permy.' Penny Bnnco's faNer nod come b Ne tinned States m 1912. AfW several trip bxk m IWy rte fuu11Y Rt- Ue0 b Qacunortga. }~tliio and PmnY gmeWY Degan going ~togNer. Ita11Y1•AmsTican mothers and rotnen nod no obyn;000 to tbw girls tnterwary oath the POWs. To them the pnaonen were just what they wanted nice 1WUn.mm far tDrir Wugnten. N lu a6 RCUntY wY al the camp, almat b Ue point of flit priwn<n Dnng able b sore and go as Ney pleased. Nan was still much uuvny trtatde. Almon ev- ery nigh the men IrW marathon poker games. 'ITey were pad 80 ttnu a day for Nar labors and many of theta. including PaROLU. parWYed Neu eamings orb __ loge amounu. Often the prupnen would gather m group and nag aonge. There was nev¢r m absence of food. Many of the gratefW farmers, leellne SD ttnta a day was not enough, donated cD¢kens, egg. vegetables. chece and the like. GmP Oaa Mae Strarlard ' At Ne anclbsan of the pruning xason the Dnsonen wen taken from Cucamonga to the larger Camp Ono m the San Beni Wlro tatlWls. Oro was an othcW pnson- er-of-woe enrlP and was more nraturcd. Hen. hexauee of hisaiechamral atpenence. PaacolaU wai plaeM in charge of the motor pal "When we didn't work on flit trucks we merMea tenu.' Activities at Gmp Ono wen orgemzed at a mucn nigher Iev<L Ther<was an ofhmal soccer team antl xv. erW tarot Mencan teams were mxnte0 m Dlay TTerc was also a talent search by rtremDers of the lo- cal mane group to recruit opera angers James Guthrie. who now works at the San BemarNno Munc L:bran. went OUt b U< camp LO xareh (or W nbnea and tenon Aftm aiMruomng abom 350 men Guthrie found 75 ulmted enough b prlorm. The men were featured in peAornunc<a put on Dy .the San Bernardino Concert At Camp Ono then were rennrhons. but t.`.r~ were kept ba nummum. Paocolnl took advanuRe antl vlsrte0 Penny and Der family traqumtly, Many of the oNer men also pursued romaccrs Thr wu wu almat forgotten On weekends the mcr wau'n slip away Iron Ue umD+nd go into town Some ever wain as tar a, Hollywood. Reality came craehmg Wck when the war mtled c. April of 1915. Under tat rules of Ne Geneva Coin en! ic- themen had m W retuned to I W y. TlaaR et<MWCAMP,Py<t),t aYf ~ RESOLOTION NO. 93-OS A AESOLOTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMlII SSION OF TH8 CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMDNGA, CALIYORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 93-01, DESIGNATING TEE CUCAMONGA LABOR CA!@ SITE, LOGTffi? BETWEEN POCTNILL BODLEVAAD AND ARROW ROUTE, NEST OF TH6 CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AS A LOCAL HIETORIC POINT OF INTEREST, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SOPPORT THSAEOP - APN: 207-211-01, 10-21, 31, 32, AND 34. A. Recitals. (i) Fu Mai Limited Partnership has filed an application for Point of Interest Designation 93-01, as described Sn the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thi6 Resolution, the subject Point o! Interest SO referred to ea "the application." (SS) On May 11, 1993, the Rietoric Preservation Cos®Laeion of the City of Rancho Cucamnga conducted a duly ncticed public hearing on the application. (S11) All legal prarequisltee prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, TI@REPORB, it Se hersbp found, dstazmined and resolved by the Rietoric Preservation of the Clty o! Rancho Cueamnga ea follower 1. This Cosmdeeion hereby specifically finds chat all of the facto set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Rewlution era true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 24.56 aurae of lanfl, Deeicelly a narrow, long rectangular configuration, located between Pooth111 Boulevard and Arrow Route wart o[ the Cucamonga Creek Plood Control ChnMel. 3. Saved upon anbstantiel svidencs prewntsd to thin Coaialaalon during the above-rnferenced public hearing on Msy 11, 1993, Sncluding written end oral staf! reports, togsthar with public teatlmny, and pursuant io Section 2.2d.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cods. thin Coa®Sesion hereby makes the following findings end lactss A. RSstorical and Cultural 6lgnlficancss Pinding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest is particularly reprasantntive o! an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: The •ita in gwatlon housed Siallan prLonara of war providing their wrvicaa in the agricultural produMivity of the arse during the later stages of World Nar !I, rhlch was both important and unique W the ans. W 8PC RBSOLUTZON NO. 93-05 FO MAI LIMIT® PARTNERSHIP May 11, 1993 Page 2 Finding: 2. The proposed Point of Interest Ss connected with a buslneas or use which wag once common but ie now rare. Fact/s: Ouring World War LI, the use of low-risk Italian prisoners of war to aid in tae productivity of local agricultural trope took place in this area, ae veil ee other parts of the eouthweet Onited States. With development of the area, this agricultural activity will likely never occur again. Finding: 3. The site Se the location of m important hlaiozic event or building. Fact/s: The site eerved ae camp for 499 low-rick Stalian prieonera of war during the later stages of World Nor II. The site wee used for this purpose Por nppzoximately one year until khe psieonera ware moved to nearby Camp Ono in San eernnrd£no. Th1a use Se unique to the City. d. Designation of a Historic Point of Interest Se exempt from C8{aA (Article 19, Section 15308). 5. Based upon the findings and eonclusioaa set forth in paragrepha 1, 2, 3, end 4 above, this Comission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, twat the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cueamonge hereby reeamoenda approval on this 11th day of May 1993, of Historic Point of Interest 93-01 with the following mitigations: aI Plaques or aisiler hiatorlcal agnumeats per City 8tendezde shall be provided within Tentative Tract 15540 Lo adequately mitigate the loan of any raYina of the Prisoner of Wer Camp. The design, text, and location shall bs reviewed and approved by City staff prior to the issumd of building permits (this condition rill b• included in the Ratoluilon of Approval for Tentative Tract 15540). 6. The Chairmen of this cammlaaion shall certify to the adoption of this Reaolutlon. APPROYBD AND ADOPTS TH~IS.,1~1TH~DAY O! MAY 1993. Marsha eak nka Chaf-van AYEBx COl81I98IONERBt ARMBR, SANRS, HABBgITE, 6CBMIDT, TBBBSER N088e C0181188ION=RBe ABBBNT: COlOIIBBION811Bt BILLINCB - carried W RESOI.DTION NO. 9~ ~ (~V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 93-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA LABOR CAMP SITE, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF THE COCAMONGA CAEF.R FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, AS A LOCAL HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 2U7-211-01, 18-21, 31, 32, AND 34. WHEREAS, Fu Mai Limited Partnership has filed an application foT Point of Interest Designation 93-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Aereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest Designation is referred to as the "application". WHEREAS, on May 11, 7993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the city of Rancho Ltiscamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application end, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 93-05, thereby recommending to the City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on June 2, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hentinq on that date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequlaitee prior to the adoption of this Reeo lotion have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve ae follows: SECTION 1: The appli cntion eppliea to property located at Aese9 sot's Parcel Numlaere 207-211-01, 15-21, 31, 32, and 34. SECTION 2: The application applies to approximately 24.56 acres of land, baeicelly a narrow, long, rectangular configuration, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, west of the Cucamonga Creek Plood Control Channel. SECTION 3: The proposed Point of Interest meats the following criteria estahliehed in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed Point of Interest ie particularly repreeentetive of en historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. JI CITY COIINCZL AESOLOTION NO. POI 93-01 - p0 lI.1I LINSTSO PARTNERSHIP June 2, 1993 Page 2 2. The proposed Point of Interest Ss connected with a business or uee which was once common but is now rare. 3. The site is the location of an important historic event or building. SECTION 4: Oesignation of a Point of Interest is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). SECTION 5: Hosed upon the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Council and based on the findings wet forth above, BE IT PURTHEft A65OLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the designation of the Cucamonga Labor Camp Site as an Historic Point of Interest. 7O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1993 T0: Mayor and McMers of the City Council Jack Las, A[CD, C1ty Manager FROM: Nillias J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Norks Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE MILLIKEN UNDERPASS PROJECT, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONDS ANO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION' RECOMMENDATION: It is recos~ended that City Council accept the Milliken Underpass Protect, located between S1xth Street and Jersey Boulevard, Contract No. 91-007, as cosplete, authorize the City Engineer to f11e a 'Notice of Cospletion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Perforaxnce Bond in the asount of f3,856,118.23 and release the Labor and Materials Bond 1n the asount of (1,928,059.12, six soMhs after the recordation of said notice 1f no claims have been received. Also, authorize the release of the retention in the aaaunt of (225,871.64 plus interest earned, 35 days after acceptance. BAGK6ROUN0/ANALYSIS The subtect protect has been cospleted 1n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer. The final contract asounL, based on protect docusentation, is f3, 733, 234, which includes 10 change orders in the asount of 5175,178. The original asount approved by Council was (4,048,924. Respectfully su tted, A ~~~~ '(, N111tas J. 0'Ne City Engineer NJO:MP:sd Attachsent cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. 9„3 ~ ~'~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MILLIKEN UNDERPASS PROJECT, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Milliken Underpass Protect, located between Sixth Street and Jersey Boulevard, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, iHEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~%~~~~r ~~ ORDINANCE NO._ ~ L~~~ I I~% ~, ~1- AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAS10NGA REGULATING NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONGA. A. QECITALS i.) The Federal Clean Water Act of 1957 esmblished the Na[iona] Pollutan[ Discharge Elimination System to protect waters of the United States from pollution by urban storm water mnoff; ii.) The Federal Clean Water Act allows the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to delegate its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting authority m states with an approved environmenml mgulatory program: iii.) The State of California is one of the delegated states; iv.) The Porter Cologne Act authorizes the State Water Quality Control Board, through its Regional Boards, to rtgulute and control the discharge of pollwants into waters of the state and trihumries themto; v.) Recognizing the regional nature of stomr water mnoff the California Water Quality Cnn[ml Board. Santa Ana Region nn l'ktober 26, 1990 issued Order # 9(1-136, and as amended by (hder # 923. naming the San Bernardino County Flcxxl Control District, San Bernardino County, and the sixteen incogxa'ated cities compri.eing the citius and the un- incorpomted areas in San Bernardino County within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Board as Co-Permittees nn a regional Municipal Diuharge Permit vi.) The Order includes the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Co-Permittee; vii.) Order # 9(?-136, as amended, prescribes waste discharge requirements for urban storm wamr mm~lf; viii.) Order # 90.136, as amended, myuires the Cn-Pcrmittces to enact legislation and ordinances as necessary to ensure compliance with the stom water manugemcm programs and the implemenmtion plans specified in the Ordur i x.) Order # 90-136, as amended, rcyuiros tha Co-Permittees to pursue enforcement actions as necessary to ensure compliance with the storm water management programs and the implementation plans specified in the (Eder; B. ORDINrVtiCE NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Par, A, of this Ordinance. STORM DRAIN ORDINANCE Section 1 - A thori{y. °.trpo and Pol'ry Det~mnon~, 1.01 ....................................... .................................. Authorit y 1.oz ........................................................................................... I (13 Purpose ........................... ... .. DeOnitions 1.04 ..................................................... ....................................................... ... _........... ConFlict - General C^^dition nd Proh'bition 2.01 ........................... Administration . ........_ ......................................... 4 2.02 ................................................... .Notice . ....................................... . ...................................................................................... Connections 2.04 ................. ............................Protection o(the Storm Drain System 2.05 .................................................................... Prohibited Discharges 2.06.....,,..,.. .........Exceptions to the Prohihited Discharges 2.07,,.,,,,... Notification o(Intent and Compliance with General Permits 2.08 .....................Compliance with Best Management Practices (BMP) ..................................................... . 2.09.,,,, , .....,,,.Spill Containment 2.10,,,,,,,,,,,,,_.._..,...,.,,, Immediate Notification of Accidental Discharge 2.I I .................................. Written Notification of Accidental Discharge Section - Re 'd r t a ~ r t)uirement 3.01 ............. ............... 3.02 _ .............................................. .,,...... Prohibitions `- ............................ 3 03 ................................ ........................Exemptions r . .............. .............. 3 04 .............................,...Best Management Practices , ~ ~ " . ............................ ................................................ Permits Required ~. ~' Section 4 -Ind retrial R auir ment 4.0 L..,,...,,,,.„,,,. 4 02 ..............Non-StomlWuterDischargas i . ,...,,,,, ....... 4 03 Exemptions . ............. 4.04 ..............................Best Management Practices ........................... _ .. _...... _...................,....,...... Permits Required Section 5 - Constr~rt' n R gpirement 5.01,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Permitted Non-Storm Water Discharges 5.02 ............................ . ........Best Management Practices 5.03 ........................................................................... Permits Required ....................................................................... Authority to Inspect ................................. Notice of Violation and Notice to Remediate ................................................................... Falsifying Infortna[ion .................................................................. Adminis!mtive Hearing ............................................................ _..... Administrative Orders .......................................................................................... APPeals ........._ ...............................................................Criminal Penalties ..........................................................Compensation for Damages SECTION 1 AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND POLICY, DEFINITIONS SECTION 1.01 AUTHORITY This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to authority conferred by law including, but not limiced to, the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et segJ; the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 122; Porter Cologne Act; and, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. CA 8000200 issued by the California Water Quality Contml Board, Santa Ana Region. SECTION 1.02 PURPOSE The purpose nt this Ordinance is to pmmnte the future health, safety and general welfam by controlling and/or eliminating non-storm water discharges into the City of Rancho Cucamonga storm drain system. This will he accomplished by elimina[ing all non-permitted discharges to the municipal separate storm sewers, controlling the discharge «~ municipal separate storm sewers from spills, dumping or disposal of materials other than storm water, and reducing pollutants in storm water discharges to the maximum extent practicable. The intent of this ordinance is to protect and enhance the water quality of our watercourses, water bodies, ground water and wetlands in to manner pursuant to and consistent with federate stale, and hx:al laws and regulations. SECTION 1.03 DEFINITIONS $js~p. BMP shall mean any Best Management Practice, Best Management Guideline, or Best Management Requirement as adopted by any Federal, State, regional, or local agency as applicable to the storm drain system. ~jly Permit City Permit shall mean any permit issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Constrztetinn Aetivitv. Consuiretinn Activity shall mean any activity as deFlned by the Stale Winer Resources Board or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. whichever is more restrictive, that necessitates secm'ing an NPDES Permit ar NOI. II'ceal Disch:vye. I!Icgal Discharge sindl moan any dischurec m the storm wmor drai nuge sys!zm that is not composed entirzly of swim water or contains con.etinrents not provided for under PrnhihitcJ Discherecs Szctinn ?.116. Illicit Connection. I!Iicit Connection shall mean any connection to thz srorm water druinaee system that is not permitted pursuant to a valid NPDES Permit or written approval by tha City. L NOI shall mean a :Notice of Intern to comply with err. adopted NPDES storm water permit. Non-Storm Rater, lion-storm water is any water not associated with storm Rlnnl f and that OI'IglnateS pn OI' IraVl'rti&S any property, NP~Permit. NPDES Permit shall mean any permit issued pursuant to the NPDES program under the Federal Clean Water Act. NPDES, NPDES shall mean the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Receiving Waer. Receiving Water shall mean all waters of the United States and trihutaries of waters of the United States that are used for recrcatianal nr other purposes; Irnm which fish or shell (ish arc tuAcn; or which arc used far industrial proposes by indusnics in intcrntam cnmmcrce. Storm Drain S aem. Strom Drain Sy.ucm shall mean all of the property owned, loused, or conu'nlled by the City and used directly or indimedy in the collection, com'eyana~, storage or disposal of slum water and including, but oat limited to, conduits. natural nr nrtilicial drains, channels, halms and watercnu rses, wgether with appurtenances, pumping stations and cyuipment. Storm Water Pollut ion Stom Namr Pollution Prevention Plan shall mean the plan 'r v~ntinn Plaa an dasciibrd in the Canerul Consuvcunn Activity Storm Water Permit u.c issued by the 3mtc Water Resources Contro! Board un August 211, 19)2 and as may he amcntlatl. Swimming Pool. Swimming Ponl is any body o(water created by artificial means designed or used far swimming, immersion or therapeutic purposes. SZS~.C User is the owner. tenant. or other lawful pos=essrn' of the premise. SECTION 1.U4 CONFLICT The provisions of this Ordinance shall govern where such provisions are inconsistent wi[h uny other Ordiiutnce of the City. SECTION 2 GENERAL CONDITIONS AND PROHH1ITfONS SECTION ?.111 ADh1INISTRATION Except as otherwise provided herein, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall administer, implement and enforce the provisions of this Ordinance..Any powers granted rn' duties imposed upon the City Engineer may be delegated by the City Engineer to persons acting in the henolicial intemst of or in the employ ol'the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2.112 NOTICE Unless otherwise provided herein. uny notice required to he given by the City Engineer under this Ordinance shall he in writing and served in person or 6y first class nr registered or certified mail Notice shall he deemed to have been given at the time of deposit, postage prepaid. in a facility regularly serviced by the United States Postal Service. SECTION 2.03 CONNECTIONS The discharge nr diversion of storm water ornon-storm water is permissible only when connection to the stom drain system is made in accordance with a valid City permit. approved constnic~inn plan, or an NPDES permit and/or an NOt, and the discharge conforms to the standards of Secfion 206. It is prnhihited to estuhlish, use, maintain and/or continue any illicit connections ro the Cily storm drain sysem. This prnhihition i:. reu'nactive and applies to connections made in the post. regarcilcss nl whether made under a permit or other authorization or whether permissi Me under the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of the connection. Permits arc reyuired Inr the con.cu'uctinn nr mndil'ication of any storm drain or com•eyor of drainage waters and appurten;mt items within: Dedicated easuments, lights-n(-way, or public place and/or facility; (2) Private property so as it may dirrr,ly or indirectly discharge into the storm drain ,eystem. Indirret di.uhargea include, but arc not nocess;rily limited n,. under sidca•alk drains, driveway approaches, and unresn•ictdd shoe[ Ilow. SECTION 2.04 PROTECTION OF THE CITY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM Without prior wri r;:;n approval nl the City Engineer, nn person shall construct or modify or cause to he constructed or modil'icd any suvcture, facility, or appurtenant items which may alter the normal functioning of the City storm drain system, including actions which may alter the capacity, fall, rn'stmcnnal inmgrity of a storm drain, chunnch or relatad Hrucuvc.a. SECTION 2.05 PROHIBITED DISCH:~RGES II is prohibited to: (l) Discharge directly or indirectly into the City storm drain system any non- storm water or other solid, liyuiti or gaseous matter in violation of any law, rule, regulation, permit, order nr other requirement nl' any federal, stale, county, municipal nr other governmental rmity or agency. Q) Discharge non-storm water directly or indirectly to the storm drain system nr any sh~eeL lined or unlined drainage ditch which leads to a puhlic storm drain, unless such discharge is permitted by an NPDES Permit or a Coy permit If such discharge is permitted by a NPDES Permit, but causes the City to violate any portion of its NPDES Permit (or storm water discharges, such discharge is also prahihitud. (3) Throw, deposit, (cave, muintnin, kce.p, or permit a, he thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained, in nr upon any street, alley, sidewalk, storm dram, inlet, catch hasin, Conduit or other drainage structures, husiness place, or upon any public or pri vato lot in the City, any re(ose, rubbish. garhagu, or other discarded ar abandoned oh,jects, articles, accumulations, or any substance Ihm pollutes nr may pollute .ttortn wmer. (4) Throw or deposit litter in any publically owned, maintained, or operated body of water within the City. SECTION 2.Ob F,XCEPTIONS TO THE PROFIIB ITED DISCHARGES The fallowing discharges are exempt I'rnm the Prohibited Discharges listed in Section 2.U5: (I) Waterline 17 ushing and other discharges from potable water sources, provided that the chlorine residual in any heavily chlorinated water used to disinfect water storage 1'ucilities or water mains is thoroughly neutralized prior to contacting rocciving waters; (2) Landscape itrieutinn, lawn wueciing, and initiation water, (3) Diverted stream t7ow.c, rising ground water, inliltrmion M'separate storm drains, springs, !l mvs from riparian huhitats and wotlands; (1) Uncontaminmed pumped ground water, foundation and footing drains, water from crawl space pumps, air conditioning condensation; (Sl Individual residential car wushins, de-chlorinated swimming pool discharges; and, (6) Flows from fire lightine. SECTION 2.07 NOTIFICA"f1ON OF INTENT AN'D COMPLIANCE ~~'ITH GENERAL PERMITS Eoch industrial discharger, discharger ussoeialed with conswetion activity, or other discharger, described in any general storm water permit addressing such discharges, as may be adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. the State Water Resources Conurol Board, or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Santa Ana Region, shall provide NOI, comply with, and undertake all athar activities reyuired by any general NPDES storm water permit applicahle to such discharges. Each dischareer idemil'ied in an individual NPDES permit or Discharge Order relating to storm water discharges shall comply with and undertake all activities reyuired by such permit nr order. SECTION 2.OR CO!FIPLIA NCE WITH BEST 11fANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BbIP) Any person undertnkin¢ any activity ur operation that causes or contributes to illegal discharges or storm wafer pollution shall comply with all applicahle BMPs. SECTION 2.09 SPILL CONTAINMENT Spill conainment systems, as may he reyuired, shall conform to requirements established by the City Engineer. No person shall operate a spill containment system that allows incompatible IiyuiJ to mix thereby creating hazardous ur toxic substances in the event nl failure al ono nr more containers. Spill containment systems shall consist of a system of dikes, walls, harriers, berms, or other devices designed !o contain spillage of the liquid contents of containers. Spill containment systems shall ho constructed of impermeable and non-reueuve materials Ur the liyuida Ixing canmined. Spilled or looked waste and accumulated precipitation shall he removed from the spill containment system in as timely a manner as is necessary to prevent overflow of the collection system. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Engineer, all chemicals or wastes discharged within the rnlluction area shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicahlu kderal, state, and Inca) laws and regulations and not discharged to the public sewer, the smrm drain system, or the ground. SECTION 2.10 IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE Protection of the Storm Drain syswm from the accidental discharge of prohibited material is the responsihility of the parson nr persons in charge of the facility where such discharges may occur. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this proteciinn shall he submitted to the City for review, and shall he approved by the City Engineer prior to any construction. All plans shall include provisions for the immediate nmilicmion m the City ol'necidental discharges which may enter the City stone drain system. All existing usury shall complete such a plan. Review and approval of such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the user Crom the rosponsihility to modify the user's facility as necessary to meet the reyuiroments of this Ordinance. SECTION 2.11 WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE A notice shall he pertnanendy posted in a)+rominent place advising umployees who to contact in the event of an accidental dtscharge. Employees shall ensure that all employees arc advised of the emergency notification procedures. In the event of an accidenml discharge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone and notify the applicahle local, federal, and state offices. Within five (5) working days following an accidental discharge to the storm drain system the person or persons in charge n( the facility permi«ing the accidental discharged shall suhmit a written report to the City Engineer. The report shall descrihe in detail the type, volume and cause M'the discharge, corrective actions taken, and measures to he taken to pmvenl future occunenees, Such notification shall not relieve the user of any lines nr civil penalties incurred as a insult of such event, or any other liuhility which may he imposed by this Ordinance or other applicahle laws. SECTION 3 RESIDENT[.AL .4ND COM1IDIERCIAL REQUIREMENTS IRescivcd) SECTION 9 INDUSTRIAL REQUIREMENTS (Reserved) SECTION 5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 5.01 PERMITTED NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES The following pcimit[ed non-storm water discharges are allowed under the General Constniction Permit so long as they comply with BMPs as descrihed in the Stortn Watar Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and they do not cause or contribute to violation of any water quality standard nr federal, state, or local law or regulation. (I) Landscape inigatinn of erosion control measures; (2) Waterline flushing and Icsling as provided far in Section 2.(lt; (3) Street washing; (4) De-watering; (5) Dust Con[rol; (6) Soil Compaction; and, (7) Discharges of non-storm water as may Fk necessary for p;rfarmance and completion al certain conswctian projects. SECTION 5.02 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES fRescrvod) v SECTION 5,03 PERMITS REQ[i1RED .Any individual or emity wishing to onesge in ronsnvctinn activity shall comply with Section ?.117, and provide evidence of compliance prior obtaining any City issued grading nr consuiiction pe~mirs. SECTION 6 ENFORCEMENT SECTION 6.111 AUTHORITY TO INSPECT The City Engineer, or designated repnsenta;ive, shall he authnri zed at any reasnnahle time to enter the premises nl' any user of the storm drain system to determine compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance, and to: (!) Conduct inspection, sampling, monitoring, and/or other authorized duties to enforce the pmvisions of this Ordinance; (2) Review any records, reports, test results or other information required to enforce the provisions n( this Ordinance. Such review may include the necessity to photograph, vidcompe, or copy any applicable information; and. (3) Inspect nny was~cs, chemicals, storngc areas, storage conminers, waste generating processes, treatment Iscilities, and discharge locations. Such inspection may include the necessity to photograph or videotape any applicable wastes, chemicals, storage areas, storage containers, waste generating processes, treatment fxilities, and discharge locations. Adeyuate identification shall he provided by the City Engineer, nr designated representative, when ensuring the premises of any user. It'such entry is refused or cannot he obtained, the City Erginrcr shall have rccowse to every n~medy provided by law to secure lawful envy and inspection n(the promises. If the City Engineer has rcasonaMc roux; to believe that non-storm water discharge conditions un or omanuting Irom tlto premises are so hazardous, unsafe, or dangerous as to require immediate inspection to safeguard the public heahh or safety, the City Engineer shall have the light to imrnediately enter and inspect the property, and may use any ivasonahle means rcquimd to effect such entry and make such inspection and take all necessary steps to protect the public health and safety, whether the property is occupied or unoccupied and whether or not formal permission has been obtained. Where a user has instituted security measures requiring proper identification and clearance hol'ore entry unto she premises, the user shall make all necessary arrangements with its .ttcuriiy guards in order that, upon presentation of such identification, duly dasignmcJ City personnel .shall he permitted to enter the premises without delay for the pwpnsc of performing [hair authonzed duties. For facilities which require special clearances to conduct inspections, it shall he the responsibility oFthe user to ohtain all n.:ressary clearances nn behalf of the City so that City inspections air; not impaimd SECTION fi.02 NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE TO REhiEDIATE Whenever the City Engineer finds that any user has violated M is violating this or any provision of this Ordinance, an NPDES storm water permit or City permit the City Engineer may serve upon such person a written notice stating the nature of the violation and stating the penalties Cnr continued non-compliance. If required in the notice, the user shall submit to the City Engineeq within a prescrihed period speoiticd in rho notice, which period shall not he less than ten (IO) working days unlc.es an emergency situation dictates a shorter period, a plan indicating the cause of the violation, cnrrcciive actions which will he taken to prevent recurrence and, i(required, a prnpowd compliance schedule indicating the dates those conrctive actions will he completed. Whenever the City Engineer rinds any non-permitted, prohibited substance discharge or any other material nF any kind, in or upon the sidewalk abutting or ,adjoining any parcel of land, or upon any parcel of land nr grounds, which may result in an increase in pollutants enteri .eheFaty 3tiSriri tftairrsyrtetrb the City Engineer may give notice to remnv • y non-permitted, non-prohibited substan`~e ~- -discharge that the City may provide, u. mercm user w n receives such a nmice shall undertake the rcmedimion activities as desni bed in the notice. SECTION fi.114 FALSIFYING INFORMATION It shall he unlawful for any person to knowingly make any false statement, representation, record, report, plan, or other document and utilize the same in connection with the application for or exercise of a storm water discharge permit, oc to falsify, tamper with, or «rtndn~ inaccurate mnnitoiing devices nr methods required under this Ordinance. SECTION 6.05 ADb11NISTRATIVE HEARING Any user may request in wntine, nr the City Engineer may order an administrative hearing, at which a user who causes or allows or who has caused or allowed an unauthorised discharge to enter the City storm drain system shall show cause why a proposed enforcement action should not he taken. An administrative hearing officer who is ^ city af1'icer not directly involved in enforcement nl'this Ordinance shall preside over the administrative hcnrin,_, at which each party, including the user and the City Engineer, shall have the right to prcscum evidence. A notice shall he served nn the user specifying the time and place n( the hearing regarding the violation, tht reasons why the action is to be taken and proposed enforcement action, directing the user to show cause before the hearing officer why proposed enforcement action should nut he taken. The notice of hearing shall he served personally or by registered or certified math return receipt requested, at least ten (10) working days heloro the hearing. Service may be made nn any agent or officer of the user. SECTION fi.Ofi ADM111N tSTRATIVE ORDERS The City Engineer may require compliance with this Ordinance, NPDES permit, or City permit by issuing administative orders that are enforceable in a court of law or by directly seeking court action. Administrative orders may include stop work orders, cease and desist orders, termination of service orders and immediate termination of service orders. (I) Stop Work Order -the City Engineer may ,carve ^ written stop work order nn any person engaged in doing or causing to he done new construction, tenant improvements, altcmtions or additions, if: a. A City permit is rcyuircd and no permit has been granted by the City, h. Work has begun without prior written approval by the City Engineer; or. c. Violations of this Ordinance are found at the site of the new constmction, tenant imprmemunts, alterations or additions. Any person served a stop wm'k order shall stop such work forthwith until written authorization [n continuo is received lietm dte City Engineer, (2) Cease and Desist Order -- when the City Engineer finds that any industrial/commercial user has violated or threatens to violate any provisions nl this Ordinance or NPDES storm water permit or City permit, the Ciry Engineer may issue a cease and desist order directing the user to: a. Comply Immediately; nr Comply in accordance with a time schedule specified in the cease and dacist order. 12 A cease: and desist order may include modifications in the li~eyuency of monitoring, testing and submission of sCll-monitoring reports. (3) Termination of Service - when the City Engineer finds any industrial/commercial user has violated an adminisu~ativc order, the City Engineer may terminme storm drain service to the user. The user shall be liable for all costs for termination al sltnm drain service incurred by the user :md the City. Thi.c provision is in addition to arbor statutes, rules or regulations uulhari ring Icrminatian ol'servico for dd~nyucncy paymen[, or for any other reasons. S« n'm drain service shall hs: rc-instiniled by the Ciry Engineer al!cr thu usar has complied with all the provisions of the administmtive order. The user shall also he liahle for all costs for re- instituting storm drain service. (4) Immediate Termination of Service -the City Engineer may immediately suspend storm drain service and any City permit when such suspension is necessary, in the opinion of the City Engineer, to stop an actual or threatuned discharge which presents ar may present an imminent or suhswntial ondangermcnt to the health ar wet fare of persons or the environmon[, ar which signilicandy causes pollution to the receiving waters, ground, and water coursos of the City. Any industrial/commercial user natilied that storm drain service NPDES permit or City permit has been suspended shall immediately slop and eliminate the applicahle contributions to the storm drain system. In the event of failure to comply voluntarily with the suspension order, the City Engineer shall take s[eps as deemed necessnry, including immediate severance ot'storm drain rnnnections. The industriaUcommercial user shall he liahle for all costs incunrd by the City in terminating storm drain service. Storm drain service may he rc--instituted by the City Engineer after the ac«ial rn~ Ihreataned discharge ha.c been eliminated. A detailed wri«en statement, suhmiuud by the industrial/commercial user, duscrihing the cause of the harmful amuihution and the measures In prevent any future occurrence shall he submitted to the City Engineer within li(teen (15) working days ol'the dote al storm drain service termination. The City Engineer may adopt a proposed compliance schedule submitted by the user, or may adopt a revised mmpliunce schedule if, in the ,judgment of the City Engineer, the compliance schedule would allow the user to cause harm to the receiving waters and/or City storm drain facilities. The City Engineer will notify rho user of the adopted compliance schedule in a timely manner. The City Engineer shall not adopt a compliance schedule which extends beyond applicahle federal guitloliner. SECTION fi.07 APPEALS Any decision of the City Engineer ar the adminisu•ativo hwring officer may be appealed pursuam to Section I S.OR.0211 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as may he amended from time m time. The imposition of fines or penalties shall be stayed during the appeal period unloss the City Engineer or administrative hearing it officer, as applicahle, detciminos tlwt ,uch a stay would threaen the public safety, health or welfare. SECTION 6.08 CR1111INAL PENALTIES It shall he unlawful for any person, lirm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to tail to crnnply ~.vith any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. In addition to any other penalties rmpnscd b.y law, any person, firm, partnerships or corpnraion violating uny provi.eion of said Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its reyuiremcnts shall he deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction lhercoL shall fh: punished by a fine n(not exceeding one thousand dollars (.`; Ltx)tl.tx)), or by impii NOnment. Each such person, tine, partnership or corporation shall he deemed guilty o(a separate ol'I'ense for each and every day or °ny portion thereof during which uny violation of uny of the provisions of said Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted to continue by such person, firm, partnership or corpnrnlion and shall he deemed punishahle therefor as provided herein. SECTION fi.119 COhIPENSATtON FOR DA,4tAGE5 Any pecan who damages monitoring equipment, detrimentally affects the water quality of the United States, signil icanlly ina'eaus maintenance of, requires non- routine inspection nr sampling, causes hlockagas oF, damage lo, interference with storm drain facilities, or causes any other damages, including the imposition of tines or penalties nn the City by ledeml, swte or local regulatory agencies, shall he liable to the City for uIl damages and additional costs, including fines and penalties, occasioned therehy. An adminis«ative Ice. us may he set by Resolution of the City Councih shall he added to those charges and shall he payahle to the City within thirty (3t1) calendar days of invoicing, SECTION 7.Ofl CIVIL RE!1IEDIES AVAILABLE The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a nuisance and may he ahuted by the City through civil process by means of res«wining order, preliminary nr permanent inju action, pwtcuam to Section R.23 nl' the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, or in any other manner provided by law for the ahatement of such nuisance. SECTION 5.00 SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is fbr any reason deemed or held to M' invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any cows ofcompetent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares chat it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, senlencas, clauses, phrases, or other portions might suhscyuantly he declw'ed invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 9.00 PUBLICATION The Mayar shall sign this Ordinance end the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (IS) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this- day of 1993. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED; COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk is ORDINANCE NO. ~~' AN UNCpDIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULATING NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES IN THE CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA. A. RECITALS i.) The Federal Clean Water Act of 1987 esmblished the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System to protect waters of the United States from pollution by urban storm water runoff; ii.) The Federal Clean Water Act allows the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to delegate its National Pollutant Di.nharge Elimination System petrniuing authority la states with an apprrnrod environmental rogulatory program; iii.) The State of Cali(omia is one of the Aclegated states; iv.) The Porter Cologne Act authorir~s the State W ater Quality Control Board, through its Regional Boards, w regula[e and control the discharge of pollutants into waters of the state and tributaries thereto; v.) Recognizing the regional natwt of storm water mnoff the Calilnmia Water Quality' Control Board, Santa Ana Region nn (ktober 26, 1990 issued Order ;# 90-13fi, and us amondul by Order # 92-43, naming the San Bernardino County' Flood Control District San Bcmurdinn County, and the xixlecn incaiPorated cities cnmpti sing the cities and the un- incorpnratcd amen in San Bcmurdinn County within thu,jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Board as Co-Peimitteas nn a regional Municipal Discharge Permit vi.) The Order includes the City of Rancho Cucmm~nga as a Co-Peimittee; vii.) Order # <NI-136, as amended, prescribes waste discharge rcyuirements for urban storm wmcr nmofl; viii.) Order # 911-I ifi, a,e amended, ruyuires the Co-Pcrmitleus to enact Iegislmion and ordinnncex as necessary «t en.vure comp!innec with the storm venter mmmgancm proprnnts and the implementation plans specified in the Order; ix.) Order # rNl-13fi, as amended, myuires the Cn-Pennittecs to pursue enforcemont actions as ncecssary to ensure compliance with the storm water management programs and the implementation plans specified in the (hhdur; 41 B. ORDINANCE NUW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of this Ordinance. STORM DRAIN ORDINANCE ion I.OI ............................................ ............................................ Authority 1.02 ............................................ ...............................................Purpose 1.03 ............................................ .......................................... Definitions L04 .......................... .......... ............CnnFlict Section 2 -General Conditions and Prnhiirit'nn 2.01 ............................... ...,,... Administration ......................................... 2.112 ............................................................................................ Notice 2.U3 .................................. _................................................ Connections 2(14„ .,._.._............. _ ...................Protectien of the Storm Drain System ?.f15 ....................................................................Prohibited Discharges 2.f1E .................... ...............Exceptions to the ProhibiteA Discharges 2.117,,,,,,,,,, Notil icatinn nl' In tem and Compliance with General Permits 2.f1S,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,_Compliance with Best Management Practices (BMP) . ................ 2.U9............ _ ......................................... Spill Containment 2.I(L...,,,.,„ .................lmmediate Nrnilkmion of Accidentul Discharge 2.1 L,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1V ii «en Notification of Accidental Discharge Section 3 -Residential and Cnmmrrrint Rngt' mnnrc 3.f11 ................................................................................... Prohihitions ?.02 ................................................................... _..............,Exeraptions 3.(13 ........................ .........Best Management Practices 3.(14 ....................._.....,..........................,.................... PermiLS Rcquimd SeCti00 Q - Indll~frinl Renuir _.._ ____ emenh 4.(11 .......................... ............................ NOn-S(llnll Water DIRI'haIPES 4.112..... _. .................. E%CmphOnS 4.f13..... _, _6e.ct Management Pactices 4.f14„,,,,,,,,,., ........................ PL`I'ml(,c Rcyuired Section 5 - Concirnetinn Rennirem ne 5.f11,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, Permr iced Non-Storm Water Discharges 5.02„ ..........................................................Bast Management Practices 5.f13 ................_.................................._...................... Permits Required .................................._.......... Authority to Inspect ,,,,,,,, Notice of Violation and Notice to Remediate .......................................... Falsifying infornation ......................................_.Administmtive Hearing ........................................... Administmtive Orders ................................................................. Appeals .................................................Criminal Penalties .................................Com punsation for Damages SECTION 1 AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND POLICY, DEFINITIONS SECTION 1.01 AUTHORITY This Ordinance is enacted pursuant [n authority conferred by law including, but not limited m, the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, ut scy.); the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 122; Porter Cologne Act; and, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. C.4 R(KN)2(H) issned by the California Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. SECTION 1,02 PURPOSE The purpose n1 this Ordinance is m promote the future health, safety and general welfare by controlling and/or eliminating non-storm water discharges into the City of Rancho Cucamonga storm drain system. This will be accomplished by eliminating all non-permitted discharges to the municipal separate storm sewers, controlling the discharge to municipal separate storm sewers 17om spills, dumping or disposal of materials other than storm water, and reducing pollutants in storm water discharges to the maximum extent practiwNle. The intent of this ordinance is to protect and enhance the water yuality of our watercourses, water holies, ground water and wetlands in a manner pursuant to and consistent with fcA;ral, state, and local laws and regulations. SECTION 1.03 DEFINITIONS BMP• BMP shall mean any Bas: Management Practice, Best Management Guideline, or Best Management Requirement as ntlnpicd by any Federal, State, regional, or local agency as applicable to the storm drain system. City Permit. City Pcimit shall mean any permit issued by the City of Rancho Cucnmonga. '~r7 Constrnetion Activiy-. Conswction Activity shall mean any activity aS defined by the State Water Resources Board or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, whichever is more restrictive, that necessitates securing an NPDES Permit nr NGI, Tlggal Discharne. Illegal Discharge shall mean any discharge to the storm water drainage system that is not composed entirely of storm water or contains constituents not provided for under Prohihited Discharges Section 2A6. Illicit Connection. Illicit Connection shall mean any connection to the storm water drainage system that is not permi«ed pursuant to a valid NPDES Permit or written approval by the City. N_Q.L. NOI shall mean a Notice of Intent to comply with an adopted NPDES storm water permit. Non-Storm Water. Non-storm water is any water not associated with storm mnol l and that originates on or traversal any property. NPUES Permit. NPDES Permit shall mean any permit issued pursuant to the NPDES program under the Federal Clean Waver Act. NPDES. NPDES shall mean the National Pollutant Discharge Eliminmion System. Receivin f Water. Receiving W;uer shall mean all waterx of the United States and trihut:rrics of waters ol'the United States that are used for recrcuionul or odrer purposes; from which fish or shell lish arc lal:en; or which arc used for industrial pwposes by indu.cuies in imerctate commerce. Storm Drain System. Storm Drain System shall mean all o(the property owned, leased, rn• controlled by the City and used directly or indirectly in the collection, conveyance, storage or disposal of storm water and including, but not limited to, conduits, natural or artificial drains, channels, basins and watercourses, together with appurtenances, pumping stations and cyuipmont. Storm Water Pollution Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall mean the plan Prevention Plan •rs described in the Genoral Construction Activity Storm Water Permit ;t.e issued by the Slate Water Resources Control Boned nn August 20, 1992 and us may he amended, Swimmine Pool. Swimming Pool is any body of water created by artificial moans <lesigncd or used fm' swimming, immersion or lherapculic purpaees. SLSCI User is the owner, mmmt, or olhcr lawful possessor of the promise. SECTION 1,04 CONFLICT The provisions of this Ordinance shalt govern where. aech provisions are inconsistent with any uiiIDr Ordinance of the City. SECTION 2 GENERAL CONDITIONS AND PROHIBITIONS SECTION 2.01 ADMINISTRATION Except as otherwise provided hu'ein, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall administer, implement and enforce the provisions of this Ordinance. Any powers granted or duties impoxd upon the City Engineer may be delegated by the City Engineer to persons acting in the henel least interest of or in the employ of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2.02 NO'T'ICE Unlass otherwise provided herein, any notice reyuired to he given by the City Engineer under this Ordinance shall hu in waiting and served in person or by first class or registered or certified mail. Nrnice shall he deemed u, have heen given at the time of deposi4 posmgu prepaid, in a facility regularly srniced by the United States Postal Scrvicc. SECTION 2.03 CONNECTIONS The discharge or diversion of storm water or nom-storm water is permissible only when connection to the storn drain system is made in accordance with a valid City pemit, approved construction plan, or an NPDES permit and/or an NOT, and the dixharge rnnforms to the standards of Suction 2.(16, It is prohibited to ostablish, use, maintain and/or continue any illicit connections to the City storm drain system. This prohihitian is retroactive and applies to connections mado in the past, rcgar<Ilcss of whether made under a permit or other authariration or whether pennissihle nnder the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time ol'the connection. Permits are reyuired fm' the construction cr modilication of any storm drain or conveyor of drainage waters and appurtenant items within: Dedicated easements, lights-of-way, or puhlic place and/or facility; (2) Private property so a.c ii muy directly or indirectly discharge into the storm drain system. Indirect discharges include, but are not necessarily limited to, under sidewalk drains, driveway approaches, and unresmicted sheet Ilow. SECTION 2.OJ PROTECTION OF THE CITY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM Without prior written approval of the City Engir+eer, no porson shall construct or modify or cause to he constmaed or modified any structure. (acuity, or appurtenant items which may alter the normal functioning of the City storm drain system, including actions which muy alror the capacity, f:d 1, nr sanetural integrity of a storm drain, chunnch or rotated sin+cutres. SECTION 2.05 PROHIBITED DISCFIA RGES [t is prohibited to (I) Discharge diroctly or indirectly into the City storm drain system any non- storm water or other solid, liquid or gaseous matter in violation of any law, rule, regulation, permit, order or other rcyuirement of any federate state, county, municipal nr rnher governmental amity or agency. (2) Discharge non-storm water dirrcdy or indirectly in tho storm drain system or any street, lined ar unlined drainage ditch which leads to a public storm drain, unloss such discharge is permitted by un NPDES Permit or a City permit. It'such dischage is permitted by u NPDES Permit, teat causos the City to violate any ponion nl its NPDES Pcnnit for storm water discharges, such discharge is also prohibited. (3) Throw, deposit, Icuvc, mninmin, keep, or permit to be thrown, deposited, placed. !eft or maintained, in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, storm drain, inlet, catch haste, crnrrhiil or other drainage structures. business place, or upon any puhlic ar private tat in the City, any refuse, ruhbish, garhage, or other discurderl or ahandoned ohjects, articles, accumulations, or any suhstanco that pollutes nr may pollute storm cantor. (4) Throw or deposit litter in any puhlically owned, maintained, or operated hody of water within the City. SECTION 2.06 EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITED DISCHARGES Thu following discharges are exempt livtm the Prohihitcd Discharges listed in Section 2.05: (I) Waterline hushing and other discharges Irom potahle watur sources, provided that the chlorine residual in any heavily chlorinated water used to disinfect water storage facilities or water mains is thoroughly neutralized priot'ro contacting receiving waters; 'i[) (2) Landscape irrigation, lawn watciing, and initiation water (3) Diverted stream flows, rising ground water, infiltration M'separate storm drains, springs, flows fmm riparian hahitats and wetlands; (4) Uncontaminated pumped ground water, foundation and Looting drains, water from crawl spare pumps, air conditioning condensation; (5) Individual residential car washings, de-chlori rated swimming pool discharges; and, (F) Flows from fire fighting. SECTION 2.07 NOTIFICA'CION OF INTENT AND COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL PERJTITS Each industrial discharger, discharger associated with construction activity, or other discharger, descrihed in any general storm water permit addressing such discharges, as may he adopted by the Unitod States Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, shall pmvide NO[, comply with, and undertake all other activities reyuircd by any general NPDES storm water permit applicahle to such discharges. Each discharger identified in an int". vidttnl NPDES permit or Discharge Order relating to storm wnler di.u•h;u•ges shall comply with and undertake all activities myuirod by such permit nr order. SECTION 2,OS COM1IPLIANCE WITH BF,ST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (Bp1P) Any person andurtaking any activity ar operation that causes or connihutes to illegal disharges or sunm water pollution shall comply with all applicahle BMPs. SECTION 2.f19 SPILL CONTAINMENT Spill containment systems, ns may he reyuircd, shall conform to requirements estahlished by the Cily Engineer. No person shall operate a spill containment system that allows incompatihle liquid «t mix therchy creating hazardous or tonic substances in the event of (ailuro of one nr more containers. Spill containment systems shall consist of a system of dikes, walls, harriers, hermx, or alher devices dceigned io contain spillage tit' rho liquid contents of containers. Spill cnnulinmem systems shall he con.ctnictrd o(impermeahle and non-rcactiw materials to the liyuid.c hcing conWinod. Spilled or leaked warm and accumulated precipitation shall hu removed From the spill containment sysem in as timely a manner as is neces.vuy to prevent overflow 4? of the collection system. Unless odrerwise npproved in writing by the City Engineer, all chemicals or wastes discharged within the cciluction area shall be disposed of in accordance with all appliwhle federal, state, and local laws and regulations and not di.cchargcd to the public sewer, the storm drain system, or the ground. SECTION 2.10 IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE Protection of the Storm Drain system from the accidental discharge of prohibited material is the responsibility of the person or persons in charge of the facility where such discharges may occur Detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this protection shall he submitted to the City for review, and shall he approved by the City Engineer prior to tiny construction. All plans shall include provisions for the immediate notificmion to the City ofaccidental discharges which may enter the Cily swim drain systom. All existing users shall complete such a plan. Review and approval nl'such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the user from the msponsibility to modify the usar's facility as necessary to meet the reyuimments o(this Ordinance. SECTION 2.11 WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE A notice shall he permanently pulled in a prumincm place advising employees who to contact in the event of an ar. idanml discharge. Employees shall ensure that all employees arc advised nl' the emergency notilication procutluras. In the event of an accidenal di.ach;u'ge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone and notify ;hc applicable local, federate and stale ol'l ices. Within five (5) working days following an accidenml discharge to the storm drain system rho person or persons in charge of the facility pcrmi« ing the accidenta] discharged shall submit a wriucn report to the City Engineer. The report shall describe in detail the !ypc, volumo and cause nl' the discharge, corrective actions taken, and measures m he taken ur prcvcm future <xcurrences. Such nnti Gcation shall not relieve the user of any lines or civil pen,,^.hies incurred as a resell of such event, ur any other liability which may he unposed by this Ordinance or other applieahlo lows. SECTION 3 RESIDENTIAL AND CObID1ERCIAL REQUIREMENTS (Resen•cd) SECTION 4 INDliSTR1.4L REQUIREMENTS (Rescivudl SECTION 5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 5.111 PERi111TTF,D NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES 'The li~llnwing permitted nnr~~-.euxm waicr discharges :vo allnwod under the General Consuvctinn Peimn so lone as they comply with BMPs as described in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plun (SWPPP) and they do not cause or contribute to violation of nny water quality standard or ledcrah state, or local law or regulation. (t) Landscape irrigation nl'erosion rnnunl mcasuros: (2) Waterline Ilushing and tasting us provided lix in Section 2.tIG; (7) Street washing; (4) Dc-wntciing: (5) Dust Cnntrnl; (6) Soil Compaction; end. (7) Discharges of nnn-xtonn wmcr as may he necessary t'or pcrtortnance and completion of ccrtoin conslruetion pro,jccl;,. SECTION 5.02 OLiST MANAGEh1F.NT PRACTICES rRcccrvud) ~r A SECTION 5.03 PERAlITS REQUIRF,I) Any individual o!' entity wishing to ongaec in construction activity shall comply with Section 2.07, and provide evidence al' compliance prior ohmining any City issued grading or conshactian pe!mit5. SECTION fi ENFORCE\IEN'I SECTION fi.01 AUTF10R1TY TO INSPECT The City Engineer, or dccigna!cd representative, shall he authorized at any reasonable time !o enter the premises n( any user of the storm drain system to determine compliance with the provisions of this (kdinance, and to: (1) Conduct inspection, sampling, monitoring, and/or other authorized duties to enforce the provisions nl'this Ordinance; (2) Review nny records, reports, test results nr other information requited to enforce the provisinn.c of !his Ordin;tnre. Such review may include the necessity to photograph, vidruutpe, or copy any upplic•ahle information; and. (3) In.apect any wus!c.e, chrmicul~, storage urea., suxugc containers, waste gatm'aiing ry'ocessos, ustuunem I'uciliticc, and discharge locations. Such inspection m,ry include the necessity to photograph er videotape any applicable wastes, chemicals, storage areas, storage containers, waste generating processrs, t!eatmcm facilities, and discharge locations. Adequate identification shall he provided by the City Engineer, or Designated represenmtive, when entering the. premises of any user. II such entry is refused or cannot he obtuinal, the Cily Engineer shall have rccounac to cvc!y romcdy provided by law to secure lawful enu•y and inspection of the premisa5. If the Ciry Engineer has rcasonahlc cause to hdlieve that non-stnnn water discharge conditions on or cmanming from the prcmi.cc.c arc so hazardous, unsafe, or dangerous as to require immali:uc inspection Ut safeguard the public health or safety, the City Engineer shall have the light to immediately enter and inspect the property, and may use any rca.conahle means required to el leer .such entry and make such inspection and rake all nuca5sury steps to protect the public health and safety, whether the property i~. occ•upied or unoccupied and whether nr no[ formal permission has been obtained. Where n user has instituted security measures requiring proper identification and clearance ht lore enu'y ono! thr premi,ecs, the user shall make all necessary arrangement.e with it.c security guards in order ih;u, upon presentation of such idemil'icatian, duly dcsign;ucd City personnel shall he permitted to enter the premises without delay 1'or the purpose of performing their authorized duties. For facilities which rcyuire special clearances to conduct inspections, it shall he the responsibility of the user to obtain all necessary clearances on behalf of the City so that City inspections aro riot impairod SECTION fi.02 NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE TO REMEDL4TE Whenever the City Engineer finds that any user has violated or is violating this or any provision of this Ordinance, an NPDES storm water permit or City permit the City Engineer may serve upon such person a written notice stating the natum of the violation and stating the penalties for continued non~nmpliance. If required in the notice, tht user shall submit to the City Engineer, within a prescribed period specified in the notice, which period shall not he less than ten (10) working days unlace an emergency situation dicmtes o shorter period, a plan indicating the cause of the violation, corective actions which will he taken to prevent recumnce and, il' mquired, a proposed compliance schedule indicating the dates those corrective actions will hc. completed. Whenever the City Engineer finds any non-permi«ed, prohibited substance discharge or any other material n( any kind, in or upon the sidewalk abutting or adjoining any parcel of land, or upon any parcel of land or grounds, which may result in an increase in pollutants entering the City storm drain system, the City Engineer may give notice to remove any non-permitted, nun-prohibited substance dischnrge that the City may provide. The indusu•ial/commercial user who receives such a nrnice shall unrlenake the mmediation uc iivitics as dc;crit>Ld in the notice. SECTION 6.(14 FA L5iFY1NG INFORMATION It shalt he unlawful for any person to knowingly make any false statement, representation, record, report, plan, nr other document and utilim the same in connection with the application for or exorcise. of a storm water discharge permit, or to falsify, tam per with, or rcnrler inaccurate monitoring devices or methods required under this Ordinance. 51 SECTION fi.05 ADM1IiNISTR.4TIVE HEARING Any user may inquest in writing, or the City Engineer may order an administrative hearing, at which a usor who emtces or allows or who has caused or allowed an unauthorized discharge to enter the City storm drain system shall show cause why a proposed en(omemcnt action should not h. token. An administrative hearing officer who is a city officer not directly involacd in rnlnreement of this Ordinance shall preside over the administr;uive hearing, ul which each parry, including the user and the City Engineer, shall havo the right to picm:m evidence. A notice shall hL served nn the user specifying the time and place of the hearing regarding the violation, the reasons why the action is to he taken and proposed enforcement action, directing the user to show cause before the hearing officer why proposed enforcement action should not hL taken. The notica of hearing shall be served personally or by regismred a' cenitied mail, remm receipt requested, at least ten (10) working days hcforc the hearing. Service may he made nn any agent or officer n(the user. SECTION fi.llfi ,4DNIN ISTRATIVE ORDERS The City Engineer may require compliance with this Ordinance. NPDES permit, or City permit by issuing administrative nrderx drat are cnfnrucahle in a court of law or by direc0y seeking court action. Administrative orders may include stop work nrdees, cease and desist orders, termination of service orders and immediate terminntinn n(service orders. (I) Slop Wor4: Order -the Cit}' Engineer muv srrve a wr.tten slop work order nn any person engaged in doing or causing w he done now construction, tenant imprnvcmcnis, altcmlions ur additions, il: a. A City permit is rcyui red and no permit has hwn granted by the City, Work has hegun without prior written approval by the City Engineer, or. c. Violations nl' this Ordinance are found at the site of the new constmctinn, tenant imprnvementc, alterations or additions, Any per.5nn served a .crop work order shall stop such work (onhwith urail written authorirminn to continue is rcedived li'om the Oily Engineer. (2) Cease and Dosisi Urdcr -when the City Engineer I'ind.5 that any industrial/commcrcinl user has violated or thrcatcns In violate any provisions of this Ordinance ttt NPDES storm wmer permit or City permit, the City Engineer may issue a cease and dceist order directing the user to: a. Comply immcdimcly; or Comply in accordance with a time schedule specified in the cease and dc5isl order. a7G A cease and desist order may include modifications in the Ireyuency of monitoring, testing and submission of xh'-monitoring reports. (3) Termination of Service - when the City Engineer finds any industrial/commercial ase;r has vinlnted an administrative order, the City Engineer may terminate storm drain service m the user. The user shalt be liable for all costs for tmminatinn of storm drain service incurred by the user and the City. This provision is in addition to other statutes, rules or regulations authori~ine Icrminatinn of service for delinyuency payment, or for any other reasons. Srnnn drain .cercice shall h; re-instituted by the City Engineer after the user has complied with all the provisions of the administrative order. The user shall also he liahlc. for all costs for re- instituting corm drain .ca'vicc. (4) Immediate Termination of Service -the City Engineer may immediately suspend stn!m drain service and any City permit when such suspension is necessary, in the opinion of the City Engineer, to stop an actual or threatened discharge which presents or muy present an imminent or suhstantial rndangermonl to the health or welfare of persons or the environment, or which significantly causes pollution to the receiving waters, ground, and wmer courses of tho City. Any industrial/commercial user nniilicd that .storm drain service NPDF.S permit nr City permit has been suspended shall immcdiWCly stop and eliminate the applicahlc contributions to the storm tlrnin system. In the event at' failnm to comply volunta!'ily with the suspension order, the City Engineer shall take steps as deemed necessary, including immediate u:verancc of storm drain connections. The industriaUcommurcial user shall ho liahlc for all costs incwnd by tho City in terminating steno drain service. Storm drain service muy he rr-in.ctiuncd by the City Engineer alter the actual or Ihrcatcned discharge has hzen eliminated. A demiied written statement. suhmiucd by the industrial/commercial astir, desa'ihing the cause of the hnrml'ul conu~ihutien and the measures to prevent any future occurrence shell he suhmiucd to the City Engineer within fifteen (15) working clays nl the date ol'slunn drain service teiminnlion. The City Engineer may adapt a proposed compliance schedule suhmi«ed by the user, or may adopt a revised compliance schedule iL in the judgment of the City Engineer, the sloe p!iance schedule would allow the user to sense harm to the receiving waters and/m' City storm drain fncilitius. The City Engineer will notify the user of the adopted compliance schedule in a timely manner The City Enpinccr shall not adopt a compliance .echcdule which extends hcyontl applicahlc federal guidelines. SECTION fi.07 APPEALS Any decision nl the Cily Engineer or the administrative hearing officer may be appealed pursuant « t Section IS.oR.i120 of the Rnnchn Cucamonga Municipal Code as may he amended from time a'. time. The imposition of fines or penalties shall be stayed during the xplxal period unless the City Engineer nr administrative hearing officer, as applicable, de!t:mines that such a stay would threaten the puhlic safety. health or tvcll'mr. SECTION fi.OS CRIDIIN.4L PENALTIES It shall he tmluwful for any ptrcon, firm, partnc:xhip or co+parution to violate any provision or to tail to comply with any al the rcyuirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. In addition In uny other pensltics imposed by law, soy person, firm, partneeships or corporation vinlmir.g any pprovision nl'said Ordinance or failing to comply with any of rts requirements .ehall he deemed guilty oFa misdemeanor and, upon enm•iction thtrenl', shall M: punished by a fine of not exceeding one thousand dollars (S L(NI(!0(1), or h}' impri.vnnment. Each such person, firm, partnership or corporation shall he deemed guilty of a separate olfense I'or each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation nl any of tha provisions of said Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted to rnntinue by such person, frm, partnership nr co:poratinn ;md shall hr deemed puni.ehahlc thcrol'nr ^s provided herein. SECTION fi.119 CO.\IPENSATION POR DAMACF,S Any parson who damages monitoring equipmcn4 dctrimenmlly affects tha water quality of rte United Starts, .cignil'icantly ineroa.ces maintenance of, requires nen- routino inspection or sampling, c;uisos blockages ul', damage «+, interference with storm Jrain facilities. ar cnus.+ any othca dumucos, including rho imposition of (ine.e er ptmtltirs on the City h}' lederal, state ur locui trgula«n'y agtncics, shall he liahlu to the City I'nr all damu¢rs and addidon;d rusts, including Tines and penalties, occasioned thrrahy. An admiuistr:uive fa:, us may he xt by Resolution of [he City Council, shall he added to these chm•gac ;md shall he payable to the City within shiny (3fq calendar days of invoicing. SECTION 7.11(1 CI\'IL RE\IGDIES AVAIL.4i3LF, The violation ul uny al'~ho provisions of this Ordinance .vhall constitulo a nuisance and may ho abated by the City through ciril process by means ollrstruining order, preliminary or permanrnl injunetinn, pursumtt to Section X.23 0l' the Rancho Cucamonga !s9unicipal Cade, or in any nUttr mariner provided by law for the ahatamcnt oF.cuch nulxnncc. SECTION S.11f1 SF, \'GRA1311.IT5' If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion nl'this Ordinance is for any t'wsnn ducmal nr hdd ut hr invalid rn' unrnnstihniunul by the decision of any court nl'atmpclem juasdiction, such doci.cion .shall not afla•t the validity of dte remaining portion of this Ordinance. T'he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declare.e that it would hove adopted this Ordinance and each section..cuhsectiun, scnk•ntq clause, phrase, ur ponian thurcol, irre.epective of the fact that :my one or mare seclian.c, sub.u•clinn.c..centtnccs. clatisos, phrases, nr other portions might suhseq ucndy ht ckcl:u'ttl irrvalid nr uncnaslitutinnal. i .t SECTION 9.00 PUBLICATION The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (L5) day. afNr its passage at least once in The inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circul.ned in the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED ibis- day of .1)93. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL b1EMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL A1EAIBERS: Mayor ATTEST: Debra 7. Adams. City Clerk S I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hemhy certify that the frn'oeoing Ordinance wus given a first reading at a regular meeting of the Council o(the City of Rancho Cucamonga held nn the day of 1993; a pohlic hearing was held on the day of 1993, and wus (finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City o(Rancho Cueammtga held nn the day of .1993. F,xecuted this day of California. 1993 at Rancho Cucamonga, Dehra 1. Adams, City Clerk u, UI'1'Y V1'' ItANUtlV UUUAMU1VliA STAFF REPORT DATE: Jure 2, 1993 IO: Mayor, Member of City Coundl & City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucuda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONDUCTING THE SECOND OP TFi1tEE PUBLIC HEARINGS PERTAWING TO THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND REC REATfON IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85 ). RF OMMENDATION: It is recommerMed that City Council conduct the second public hearing perhhrbrg to the kwy of annual essessmarb within the Park and Recrwdon Improvement Dutrkt (PD - g5 ). BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: This is the second of three public hearings to be conducted by City Council relevant to the kry of annual assessmenb wihin the Park and Recreation Improvement Dbtrict (PD - RS ). The Hied public hearing will be held on June 16, 1993 at which f{me City Council will be asked to take actlon approving the Annual Engineer's Report and eshbRah the aasesement rare for the Park and Recreation tmprwement'iatrict (PD RS) (or the flxal Year 1993/94.. Park and Recreation Improvement District was cmated to provide funds to fitwtce the cost of constmction, mainterunce, operation and debt payment of Hedhge Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. tiedrege Community Park is a 40 acre fac0ity braced on the soutltwest comer of Hilbide Road and Beryl Street Red Hili Community Park is 42 acres and b located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Virreyard Avenue. The Diatdct boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the gereral ezceplion of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Tam Viau Planned Cornmunitles. Pursuant to the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each ywr the City Council moat adopt resolutlons, giving prelimlrrery approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring in intention to levy and collect aseesammb for 1993/94 Fixal Year. The assessment rare increased from f35.W ro E42.00 during the 1991/92 Fixal Ywr, this rah will remain at E52.00 for the 1993/94 Fixal Yesr. Assessmarb for PD-3S will be levied according to the following xlredule: Single Family Residential E52.00 Lesa than 1.50 acres E26.00 3S1 acres tD 7A11 xres 5182.00 7.01 ecrea m 14.00 acm E364.I70 14.01 acm to 24.00 acres E728.00 25.01 acres and larger E1,300.00 5? Respectfully sub Wm. Jce O'Neil ~G~~ City Engineer Attachment: Annual Fi~gineer's Report a~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD-85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: i~~ William Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Repoli Pl}85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 AUTT-IORITY FOA RETORT 77us report for the 93; 94 fiscal year is prepared pursuant b the order of the City Cowal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and N mmplianre with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Sectlon 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are brcluded in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual lery of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereaker referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has bear created to provide fords to finance the cost of comtruction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Commwity Park and Red Hill Community Park N the City of Ranch Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 27573, landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires aasessmans lobe levied according to benefit radra than affording m assessed value. The section states: "'the net amount to be assessed upon lands wilirin an assessment disMct may be apportloned by any formula or method which fairly d'utributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportiw to the estimated berrefib to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is [ontained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Califonria). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas witirin an assessment district into benefit areas whore, by reason of variatimu N the nature, location, and ezlent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially Me same degree of benefit from the improvemenb and may mnslst of contiguous or nonrontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied w the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's tee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Artlde XIIIA. Propertles owned by public agencies, such as a city, cowry, state, or the federal govemmenq are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, ere not assessed. Cenain other parcels used for railroad mainline rightofway, public utility transmission rightof•way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assesstrrart for nwbile Forme parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage DISTRICT ANALYSiS A. [mprovemenl lTstdct Bowdary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcel9 of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of ~ Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor N the Hall of Records, 172 Weu Third Street, San Bernardino, California and whiff are hereby made a pan hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreafion Improvemast District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities 71se existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The consfn¢fion of Hertage Commonly park including, but not Bmited to, grading. planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalW, parking Tots, lighting, restrooma, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, atldetlc fadlities, and walking, jogging and equestrian tra0a. 2.Ttte constructlon of Red Hill Community park including, but not limited lo, gmding, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lob, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilitlea, playground equipment, pirnic fadlitiea, major lighted aWetle facilities, jogging tail, underground storm drain system, and adjxent pub0c street improvements. D. The asaeaament rak for the 92/93 FY Is 532.110, this rate wiu not increase for the 93/94 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the distncb maintenance and operation expenses (or the 93/94 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or reroverhtg deficib in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficib shall be included in the assessment for the following flxal year, s1 Regular Payroll S2~ ~ Fringe Benefits 580,520 Vehicle Maint./Operations 524,000 Maintenance & Operations 551,100 Equipmart Maintenance ~ Op0 General Liability 513,840 Contract Services 510,000 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.DA. Study 516,560 Water Utilities 5103,080 Electric Utilities ~~ Subtotal: 5636,310 Assessmau AdministreNon and General Overhead 5259,640 Tax Delinquerry fa2g40 Debt Service ~~ Subtotal: 51,142,080 Gross Revenue Required: 51,778,190 Less: 92/93 District Canyover <5115570~ Assessment Revenue Required: 51,662,620 METHOD OF SPREAD The landscaping and LighOng Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. B. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the puryose of determining the assessments as fO110WS: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on fire number of existing residential uNte within certain ranges of parcel size, CATEGORY B -includes aft parcels not defined in Category p or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels, Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parrnls that are Ilsted as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than 5500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel airxs in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based at actual land use Information contained in the current San Bemardira Assessor's computer Bles and Assessors parrnl maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelBng units and meeting the following mndltlons. Parcel Size Range Less than IS acres and 151 to 35 aces and 3S1 b 7.0 aces and 7.01 l014.0 aces and 14.01 ro 25A aaev and 25.01 acres & Urger and Number of Existing Res. DwelEng Unfb/Parcel 1 or rtnre dweBvtg units 2 a more dwe0irsg units 4 a more dweBirsg unib 8 or more dwelling unib 15 m more dweBfng unib ?b or more dwelling unib Category A is based on the number of existing residentlal unib. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing rpidential dwelling uNt may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district Maintenarce coati, however, are expected m increase annually and will somewhat offset the antldpated decease in assesamenb due to new devebpment Category B: AE parcel rot defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as define5 ixlow: 1. All properties cnrrrently tax exempt; 2. All public ownentdq; 3. Railroad mainline righbo(-way; 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; S. Mineral rights; b. Parcels so small they curtently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parceU within an assessed vaiuatron of less Than 5500 and 1S acres or less; and C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Arrounb Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rete which will be levied during Bsal year 1993/94 is 552.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 552.00 times the number of dwelling unib. Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1993/94 shall be according b the folbwing sdu!dule: DeRnition Assessment per parcel less tram iS0 acres S 2Q00 ISI acres b 3S0 aces f 7gpp 351 a~ m 7.0 acres f 182.00 7.01 aces to 14.0 acres f 364.110 14.01 acres to 25.0 saes f 72g,0p 25.01 acres & Urger f1,300.00 Gregory C: The assessment shall be f(1.00 for Gregory C perceU. PROJECTED 1993/94 ASSESSMEN75 23,217 Single Family ParceU 2317 units at (52.00 = 51,207,284 245 Multi-Family Parcels 4,749 unib at f52.00 = f246,998 Less 0en 1S0 Aaes (935) Parcels 1098 unib at f 26.00 f28,548 15 Acres to 3S0 Ages (909 Parceb) 401 tmib at S 78.00 S 31,278 351 Acres to 7.0 Aaea (227 Parcels) 212 unib at ft8200 = S 38,584 7.01 Acres to 74A Aces (131 Parcels) 132 unib at f364.00 S 48,048 U.OI Aces ro 25A Acres (45 Parceb) 44 unib at f728.00 = (32,032 25.01 Acres or larger (23 Parceb) jlLp((q~l f1,300.00 S 22YL0 29,876 unit f1,662,622 --, ~~ ~~ Q w c~ w c~ s ~ ,_ c F, ~ z 6 O U U p Z o z xp U PG C ~ W U Cz W O Z }- Q H C/] U ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ANNEIGYI d15 AMNE%EO AAR iI 1, 1992 iR 144!6 35 AU AMNE%ED JDNE 3, 1992 TR 1464 D AU ANNE%ED OCTOBER 7, 1997 DR 89-04 .43 AC ANME%EO OCi08ER 7, 1992 9M 12959-1 18.27 A[ ANNE%EO OCTOBER 22, 1992 TR iQ42 39 AU AMMENED MgT9ER 10, 1992 9N 11n4 30.29 AC AMNEMFD DECEMBEF 2, 1992 vN tsnG tzs Ac ANNE%ED JANUARY 20, 1993 c.u.v. 9D-te 4.oe Ac ANNEXED JAMUARr 20, 1997 TR 13759 56 AD ANNE%ED fEBRUARr 17, 7991 PN 14118 3.47 AC ~:tt r yr n.nivr:nv ~: tlt~tamvsv r:e~ STAFF REPORT DATE: lure 2,1993 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: William J. dNeil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Racket; Assodak Enginrer SUBJECT: CONDUCTING 7HE SECOND OP THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS PERTAINING TO 7fiE LEVY OP ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4 S ,6, 7 & 8. It is recommended that City CouncB conduct the secod pubBc hearvrg perfainmg m the levy of annual assessment vritldrr Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 36, ~, 5, 6, 7, k 8. This is the second of three public Haring, t be conduckd by Gty Courcil relevant to the kry of annual assessment within the Tandsup Mainteance WMcts. TH third pubtlc hearing will be held on June 16, 1993 at wlddr tlme Gty Courscil wi6 H caked t take actlon approving the Annwl Engineer's Report and estbli.sh the assessment rates for tH noted Landcape Maintaanre District for fH Fiscal Year 19^3/94.. Below is an ieemized analysis on a district by district bast. To summarize, wakr charges are increasing for all district due t a proposed rete inceeree by Cucamonga County Water District of 5% for domestic and 7% for agriicdturel, effectlve Jury 1,1993 end enotlser Increase of 5% for domestlc and 5% for agricultural e(feayive January 1,1991. N some dieMCb an incrtmse in the amount o(tndxape area b maintain ttas eased an btctease in fH amourst of mekrlesance and operation cost. In eddidon, some diatrkb are acceptlng tndxape area Into the disMct without annexing additlonal assessment uNb to off set Ure cost, N pat yeas any avai4bk prior year carryover was used ro keep ueenment bebw the annwi assessment revenue requirement, in some dtMcb this carryover no longer exist resultlng M an incmaae in the assessment rate. The foBowhtg, abng with reference ro the PrelimWry Engineer's Report, identifies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compered with Curtent FY 92/93 rates. TH PreBmirary Engineer's Report identlfles the tegdred budget for ends disMct and any carryover used m redure refes. A fax delinquercy amount is added to each dbtrkt's budget to cove antldpted delinquendes in tx payment. lF tH delinquencies are less than expected, fords witltin tH district can be added to the district fund bakrsce. However, if the detlnquencks are es proJetled, various required maintenance xtlvitles will not have available funding whkh may result in reduced service levels. u1 The recommerded rate of f92.21 from fTLA7 reflect bcreased water rates and inflation cosh and the acceptance of Old Town Park. Church Streei Pazk and the Neighborhood Center inro the District The recommended rate aF f422.na from fq(K.30 reflect increased water rates of the district LMD M2 has the largest landscape area of any district trr the City wiM 118.62 acres, of which 2750 acres is parks. I -_ ae wY Main +nc Die rk No, 3e - Ham, so The recommended role of H13.7~ from S193Af reflect IM increase water rates of the district The recommeded race of f352.80 from f3~7-08 rvAect increases in ware rates to Ute district (~~~ M ' .N LTatrjrt Nn 4 -Tern Vista The recommended rate of f252S0 from f7A82a reflccb increased ware rold to dIe dbtrkt In addition, East Greenway Corridor and 1-0D aae of grormd cove ,tuA and slwbs was accepted into the district to be matnbiratd. l a. ~l~tF "'i two TN tri-` N~ i T t.w The recomrrendad race of 1113.29 from 5108.78 reflect warn race trrcrease to the dbtrkt 1.`srsilpP Ac pi ^. . 6 - 7he recommended rate of f216.97 from f243.% reflect wader nce hlcrvase to the district. I a.vlq{dp~M infeti .rv. 1)iatri[t No. 7 - iVuM Etiwarda the recommended rate of f3fYJ56 From f3f15.43 refiecb water rote incregae to the district. ( ate. ~ 1~`aintaL LNti^+=F No. 8. Gu.ih F_.kx~~~..ra The recomnkeaied ro4 of f1f1A5 ftorrr f150AS rellecb water nce irkadse fo the dbtrict Respectfully sub G~ Wm. Joe O'Nef City Engineer Anachmenb: Annual EnghKer'a Report i. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. l (General cay Parkways, Medians, Pazks and Equestrian Trails) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landxape Mainterwtce DisMCt No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Fqueshian Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, L>;vision 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. t (LMD •1) represents 29.94 acres of larrdxape area and 38.25 acres of parks whidr are boated at various sites throughout the City. These sites ate not considered b be associated with any one particular area wlMin the City, but rather bane,^.f Me entire City on a broader xale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining [MD's. Typically parcels within this disMct have been annexed upon devebpment The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paxas, entry monuments, equestrian trails and parks. The 38.25 saes of parka consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres , 20 acres of Fast and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park 6S acres of Church Sheet Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. Oid Town Park, Church Street Park and the Neighborhood Center are being added ro the dishier this fixal year. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 41[43 Q}~g Cound Coverard Shmbs 21.47 21.47 Turf lA7 1.47 Parks ytr,Bp 38~r Fqueshi n Trails z~ _~ Total Area in LMD 41 54.94 Acres 61{.19 Ages The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the varous landxape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private Iandxape maintenance company while the equesMan hails are maintained by the City's Trails and Applicatlon Crew . The majority of the budgeted cosh for LMD 41 are for direct maintenance of tort, ground cover and shrubs and the maintenance of the parW. These functlons, along witlt tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Conlrect Services Agreement the City has with a private lartdxape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equesMan traib witltin the district. The projected cash ro operate aM maintain LMD Al are as follows: 70 Regular Payroll yUr 060,00 Fringe Benefits (15,770.00 Maintenance and Operations (16,830.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations (16,310.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental (1,000.00 Mileage f1,000.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median landscape Maintenance f236,4(p.00 Park landscape Mamterance f112,030.00 Tree Main[enanre (6,000,00 Athletic Light Maintenance 513,000.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A. Survey for b Parks (9,700.00 Touch Pad System for East & West Beryl Pazka (36,000.00 Capital Equipment Outlay (4,980.00 General Liability (7,480.00 Water Utilities f182,110.00 Electric Utili0a ~,~ Subtotal: f753,220.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead ;113,660.00 Tax Delinquency Total Revenue Requred; f963,910.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover <532,710.00> Assessment Revenue Required 931 200_00 For 93/94 the district budgeted f9,700.00 for a Mandatory A.D.A.(American's witlt Disabili8es Act) Survey. This survey b required ro evaluate design deficiencies in the districts path for A.D.A compliance. Also budgeted is an (36,000 Touch Pad System which uRll allow the disMct ro recover revenue from spoAS field Tight usage. Capibl Equipment Outlay of f4,980.(p is ro purchase equipment (or Ote Tree Mainterence Crew and the Trails end Application Gew. An411'Qia: Budgeted mainterwnce cosh for LMD M1 incmased from (735,290 in 92/93 ro (946,710 in 93/94. This increase can be attributed ro increased Maintenance cosh, Mandatory A.D.A. Surveys and the addition of Ovee City Park facilities ro LMD Ml. 'These parks will add an edditbral 13.2.5 acres of maintained area ro the diaMct. The increase in water rata is due ro the fxt That Cucamonga County Water District is anticipating an average 9S% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average Increase for the domestic rate is 7S%. 71 The FY 93/94 assessmert rate is 592.21, this is a f19.74 increase wer FY 9Z/93 which was E72.47. 71~e folbwing itemizes the assessment rate (or the district Unit No. of Access. Unit Rate/ Parcel 8,034 f92.21 ].0 f92.21 Parcel f,]jQ f92.21 0.5 (46.11 Totals 93f 1200 ~-., Q ,_ o E' ~~ 4 0 v U O Z 2 UCC~rs. C CCU W Cx, (~ O z ?~ 6 E- V7 U G 'B oG1 ~~ ~~ I'~w!]~ 10 ~ ~ ~ LND 1 ANNE%Ai10M5 ANNEXED APRIL i, 1992 TR 14486 35 AU ANNEXED JUNE 3, 1992 Ta u6u a Au ANNEXED October 22, 1992 TR tU92 39 AU ANNEXED JANUMI 20, 1993 iR 13759 56 AU 74 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~ ~-~ William eil, City Engineer 75 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engtneer's Report Landscape Maintenance Distrito No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) ciscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in rompliance with the requiremenb of Artkie 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streeb and Highways Code, State of California (Iardxipe end Lighting Act of 1972). llackt~ttod: [andxape Maintenance DisMct No. 2 (LMD 42) represenb Wdacape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landxape installation can be directly attributed b those parcels within that community. Because of this, aasessmenb nrqutred for this dbtrkt aze charged to those parcels witltin Drat planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median isWds, paseos, equestrian trails and parks. The 27.5 acres of parks in Vkbria conabt of Kenyan Park, Vlcroria Groves Park, Vintage Park end Windrows Park. The breakdown of maintainM arose is u (oBows: 92!93 StL4t Ground Coverand Shrobs 45.28 47.99 Turf 3853 40.13 Parks 2750 27.50 Fquestrian Traiia ' ~ ~,~ Total Area in [MDW2 114.31 Acm 118b2 Acres The ground rover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landxape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the garb are maintained by the City's Park Mainlenarrce Crews. The majority of the budgeted mab for LMD N2 are (or direct maintenance of mrf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and cerhin IMgatbn system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Servkn Agreement 0te City hea with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and AppBcatlon Crew maintains Me equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district The projected cosb to operate and mainbin LMD N2 areas tolknvs: 76 Regular Payroll 5269,770.00 Part Time Salaries q~~O.Op Fringe Benefits f94A20.00 Maintenance and Operations 541,300.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations (10,000.00 Mileage (340.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle b: Equipment Renal (1,000.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance f568,810.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory ADA Survey fq,gOp,Op Mandatory ADA Implementation f25,280.00 Variow Renovations to All Four District Parb 560,520.00 Renovations to Etiwanda TraB (96,000,00 Landscape Renovation b Contract Maint.. Areas f90,270.00 Capital Equipment OutiaY f27S50.00 General Liability 512,330.00 Water Utilities 5455,700.00 Electric Utilities (~ Subtokl: 51,782,310.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 5136,210.00 Tax Delinquency (301,690.00 Torsi Revenue Required: (2,084,030.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover cdea78.100,0p> Assessment Revenue Required 1 705 930.00 For FY 93/94, the district budgeted (4,400 for a Mandatory A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluak deign deficiencies in the districts parks for A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is (25,200 (or Mandatory A.D.A Impkme~ktion in Kenyon and Vintage Parks. Various renovations to the (our Distrct parks for f60S20 include replacing the tot lot deck replacing the corcrek trail fence wilt PVC and repainting the steel fence at Windrows Park, construct retaining wall at Vintage Park, end repaint basketball courts at all four parks. Renovations b Etiwande Trail for (%,000 reconstructing curb and correcting Ne drainage problem on the trail landscape renovation for f90,270 include replacing trees, shntbs and ground cover at various median island and parkway sites. Capial Equipment Outlay of f27,550 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. In FY 92/93, the Assessment rak for LMD ft2 was (/05.30, this tale will ircr~se ro f422,(p for the 93/94 Fl'. This Increase is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water District is // anticipating an average 9S% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average increase for Ore domestic rate is 7S%. There were rw new assessmenb units added to Ole dIStrICt 11119 Vear. ~' 93!94 A IL ex~s=:ent tr. The following itemizes Ore assessment rate for Ore districC Unit No. of INld Use Tlme ina. Unit Pale/ ~ partrt f 91 Single Family Parcel 3,763.00 (422.00 1.0 (422.00 51,597,990 Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 (422,00 1.0 (422,00 (52,330 Commerrial Acre 15.74 (422,00 2.0 (914.00 f13,280 Vacant Acre ¢Qfj,QQ (422.00 0.25 5305.50 1~.'}~Q TS2TAL4 4,400.74 if ,705,930 10 d ~~ O Z v ~ V C "' q Z ~ ~ V Cs7 O ~ F CC/6] U y~ R n A BBBd~ ~~d ~~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance ITsMtY No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance DisMM) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 92/93 annual report for Landxape Mainterwrce Distrct No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance DisMct) is prepared in compliance with Ore requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of Me Street and Highways Code, State of Ceiifomia (Lardxape and Lighting An of 1971). 14askYrwtod: Landxape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD ttla) represeMS a 4ndxape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of SixM Street The sire is associated with an area wiMin Mat district and as such any benefit derived from Me landxape 'vu414tion can be directly attributed hr (hose parcels wiMin that district. Because of Mia, asseumerb required for this distrct are rl~erged to Besse parcels wiMuf tlut district. The breakdown of maintained arils 4 e9 folbwe: S2/S1 %1L4t Ground Coverarui SFwbs 0.11 0.11 Turf fLOQ B.OQ To41 Area in LMD 13a 0.14 P_Crea 0.14 Aaea The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private 4ndxape mavuenance company. The majority of the budgeted coat for LMD 13a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along wiM tree maintenance and certain irrigatlan system repair and testing are performed Mrough a Contract Services Agreement the City has wiM a private Iandxape maintenance company. The projected cmb W operate and maintain LMD 13a are as follows: 81 Regular Payroll 630.00 Fringe Earefils (10.00 Maintenance and Operations (390.00 Vehicle Matnlerance and Operations (0.00 Contract Services landxape and Tree Maintawrce 51,830.00 Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Rerovatbns (600.00 Moisture Sereor & Canholler FncMsure Installations f5,040.00 General Liability (40,00 Water Utilities 6870.00 Electric Utilities S3T,0,04 Subtotal: 68,930.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 5290.00 Tax Delinquerxy S4LQ!! Cross Revenue Required: f9,220.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover <53.910.(ab Toral Revenue Required: (3,310.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted f600.00 landscape p1aM material renovation and 65,010.00 (or Moisture Sensor and mntrolhr encbsure butalletloro. No vehtcle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in93/94. ~d In the FY 92/93 Ore assessmest rate fvr [.MD M3a was 6393.04/A.U. This will ircrease to 5413.74 for the FY 93/94 to cover the current maintenance costs of the disMct and Ote anticipated average 9S9L agricultural and the average 7S9G domestlc water rate increases. This represents an increase of 5.27% war last Osml year, No new assesatreua were arutexed into the district this year. The following itemizes Me assessment rah for the district Unit Rate/. [ard use Tune unite Rate Factor Ail Revenue Industrial Parcel 8 6413.74 1.0 (413,74 63a1o•00 QG c~ ~--, ~i ~~ ~~ F.~ w o... d ~ ,_ o E' ~~ a ~ ~ Q U O Z O .~~ Cp'.. P~CCU fs. ~W O Z ?-~ C ~~ U t~~ ~ ~ ® ii~~i ~ ~~~ 83 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercia 1 /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Ciry Engineer 84 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) '[he FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintaw~ce District No. 36 (Commercal/Gdusfrial MaintenarKe District) is prepared m compliance with the re~quitenunb of Article 4, lfiapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California ([anduape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landuape Maintenanre District No. 36 (I.MD M3b) represents Iarduape slip tlvoughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the lardscape installation can be directty attributed ro those parcels within thot district. Because of this, aasessrnenb required for this district are charged ro those parcels within that district The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92L73 %il3S Cound Coverand Shrobs 5.95 6,74 Turf ~ ~ Total Area in LMD Nab 914 Aces 10.03 Acres The rorf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The majority of the budgeted msb for LMD N36 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testlng are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has witlt a private landscape mainterwece company. A portion of the budgeted costa are for the maintenance for the median islands and parkways on Milliken Avenue located south of Jersey Bivd at the Grade Separation for the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. The projected cosh ro operate and maintain I.MD N36 areas follows: Regular Payroll 51,940.00 Fringe Benefits 5680.00 Maintenance and Operations f'7,700.W Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 51,030.00 Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental 51,000.00 Contract Services LarWuape Maintesunce 5136,050.00 Tree Maintenance 526,500.00 Capital Expenditures irrigation Upgrades ro Central Control 558,500.00 Landscape Plant Material Rerovations 512p00.00 Milliken Ave. Landscape Rehabilihation f155,68i1.00 Capita Equipment Outlay /Vehicle 520,000.00 General Liability 52540.00 Water Utilities ¢t2,830.00 Electric Utilities 59.924.QQ Subtotal: 5476,370.00 Assessmett Administration and General Overhead 529,180.00 Tax Del'uquenry t5S L1ta.M Subrofal: (84,790.00 Groan Revenue Required: 5561,160.00 Less: 92/93 Distrkt Carryover <5749.270.00> Total Revenue Required: 11~1b90 .W.W ~41Y414% N the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD Klb was 5347.08/A.U.,thb wiB increase ro 5352,80 for the FY 93/94. Thu increase is due ro the fact that Cucamonga County Water District has implemented an average 95% agricultural water rate Increase for the fiscal year, while the average increase for the dorrwtk rate Is 73%. 49.58 asaastrsent imib have beat added to the district this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the districe Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ Land Use Tyoe hula Rat Fxtrr AU. Revenue bdustrial/Comm. Acre 1167.48 (352.90 1.0 5352.80 5911~ffi totals 5411.890 c~ E--~ U ~--, w w w z ~ ~~ e~ ~~ ~o ozo a a v o~ =~ ~~~ ~ ~ a ~,~ ~ ~ ~ Ero ~ ANNEIGiidS ANNEXED OCiDBER 7, 1992 DR 89-DG .<3 AC ANNE%EO OGYDBER 7, 1992 PM 12959-1 18.2) AC ANNEXED NOVEMBER 18, 1992 vN 13nG SD.z9 Ac ANME%ED DECEMBER 2, 1992 PN 13nG 12.3 AC ANMEXEO JANUARY 20, 1993 c.D.v. 9o-1e G.oe Ac ANNEXED fFBRWRY 77, 199} vM u31e S.u Ac Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tarts Vista Planned Community) Fdacal Yea[ 9x/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for lardxape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tarts Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requiremenb of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Stale of California (landxape and Lighting Act of 1972). 1 Landxape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD 44) represents Iandxape sites throughout the Terta Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landxape inspllatlon can be directly atMbuled to those parcels within that district Because of tltis, asseasmenb requited for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landxape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos and parks. tltere was area acre of mainfai[1ed area added [o the district this year, the breakdown of rnahuakfed areas is as follows: ~L~ ~~ Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.27 8.35 Turf 6.62 6.58 Parks 22.04 2204 Total Area in LMD 44 40.89 Acres 41.89 Aces The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contras by a private Iandxape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Gews. Pyp)ected Coats 'the majority of the budgeted cosh for LMD N4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree rnain[enanre and certain irrigatlon system repair and testing are performed through a Contras Servkes Agreement the City has with a private landxape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted costs are for Me maintenance for Fast Greenway Corridor, which is starts on the east side of Milliken Avenue, just rrorth of Milliken Park and runs easterly to Terra Vista Parkway East. 7Tus maintenance area will be added to the distris this fixal year. The projected costs m operate and maintain LMD 44 ere as follows: Regular Payroll f260,090.00 Part Time Salaries !4,650.00 Fringe Benefits !91,030.00 Maintenance and Operations f41,050,00 Mileage 5260.00 Vehicle Mainterwrce and Operations 530,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vetdcle & Equipment Rental 51,000.00 Contract Services landscape Maintenance !191,310.00 Tree Maintenance 52,000.00 Capital Expenditures Repaint Basketball Court ®District Parks !4,320.00 Exercise Sttion Replacement 517,280.00 Terra Vista /Base Line Median Renovation !413,780.00 Milliken Park Expansion: Expand Fx. Parking Lot S%,000.00 Expand Ex. Balifield & Add Sport Light 5120,000.00 Mandatory A.D.A Study for District Parb 514,600.00 Capitl Outlay /Equipment (22,750.00 General Liability (5,090.00 Water Utilities 5130,930.00 Electric Utilities 5T9.1NLflII Subtotl: 51,469,290.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead !89,140.00 Tax Delinquency 50.4!! Gross Revenue Required: 51,558,430.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ <i524.690.00> Total Revenue Required: 1 740.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted 514,600 for a Mandatory A.D.A. (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design defidendes in the district's parks for A.DA. compliance. Also budgeted for the district's parka is !4,320 to repaint basketball court and 517,280 for exercise station replaremenb at Coyote Canyon and Spruce Parke. The Milliken Park Expansion includes expanding the existing parking lot to add 25 parking ata0e (or f%,000 and expanding the existing 60' ball field b a 951' fleM and installing sports field lighting and a Touch Pad System for !120,000. There is N13,780 budgeted for the Terra Vista Parkway/ Base Line Road Median Renovation and 522,750 budgeted for the purchase of equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. AB4lyaial In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD M4 was 248.24/A.0., this will increase to 5252.50/A.U. for the FY 93/94. This increase is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water Dishic is anticipating an average 9.5% agrkultural water rate increase for the fiscal year and an average increase for the domestic rate of 7.5%. 357 new asseasmenfs unit were annexed to the district this year. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computtion Chart. 91 FY 9_'+Na Asaesament Rah The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district _ Unit No, of Rate/, Single Family Parcel 1934.00 f25250 f4gg,3~0 Multi Parcel 2215.00 f222.00 f491,730 Commercial Aere 137.21 f382.99 (52,550 Vacant Acre 30.14 537.12 ct »n 1003 740 M 888 P ~ N O O 3~a 9 t9 V >' > 88 ~.. ~ ~< V° tS 8 8 T T ~+ ~+ E $ E G C W (Nryy a N ... 44 a ~ ~ ~ pqp o a T g T e~ E~ ~ s r~~5 w Y ~ 2 0 ~ a `' EE d s' ~ yF E 5 a N H $c 7' ~ rv~ E 0 V 8 8 .~ YI wl 6 r N W 8 O ~i 9 VY 4 G P ~ n~~ S 7 ~~~ ~o v o E r ~ ~ E $ ~, ~, 3LL Z T ~~~ ~ ~~~ W 292929 ~ S T W ~ ~~ ~ M A _y ~3 9 ~~ e6 ~ ~ 3 T ~ n r S~ ~~ ss n~ ~~ ~5 i ~ryp a ~ S iJ r C~_ ~ N C T. o q t 3 ~ K iA a ~71~ d Z ~`" O ~ ~ p 6 p '` U 6 U O Z ~ ~ U w ~~ 0 z r a E- v~ U ~ ~~ ~~ s ~ l1Df AMXE1UT10N4 ANNEXED A9AIL 1, 1992 TRACT AMS N AU ANNEXED A9RIL 1, 1992 TRACT 13294 15.72 AU AMME%EO 1f1Y 6, 1992 iR 14407 114 AD ANNEXED MAY b, 1992 TR 1K07~1 13 AU Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District Iv`o. 5 (Tot Lot) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance wiM the requiren~b of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Code, Skk of California (Landscape and Lighting Ad of 1972). 13aslc~mandl [andscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD NS) represent a Isndacaped Tot Lot ,located on the southwest comer of Andover Pbce and Bedford Drive. Thb sik u asaodated wiM a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a rnmmon usage of the Tot Cot such that any benefit derived from the landscapng can be directly attributed to those parfkular parcels. Betauae of this, assessments required for itch district are charged to throe apeciBc parcels. '[here is Doty one sik mainkined by the district. It consist of a Tot Lot and a small amount of shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities d maintained arena mrtsiat of•. 92L4(il %dL9! Ground Cover and Shrubs 033 0.33 Total Area in [MD MS 0.33 Acres 033 Acres The ground cover and shrubs arms are maintained under contract by a privak landscape maintenance company. The majority of the budgeted cwt for LMD a5 are for direct meinteatance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along wiM tree rralntatance and catkin irrigation system repair erd ksting are performed through a Contract Servicm Agreement dte City has witlt a private landscape maintenance company. The projeckd cosh ro operak and rreinkin LMD NS are as kllows: .7l Regular Payroll §80.00 Fringe Benefits §30.00 Matnterunce and Operations 5500.00 Vehicle Maintenance std Operations §70.00 Conhact Services Landscape Maintenatxe 51,060.00 Gpital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A Survey for Tot Lot f1,100.00 Irrigation Upgrades to Replace Risers w/Pup Ups §1,200.00 Landscape Material Renovation §600.00 IrrigaOon Upgrades to Ceturol Control §5,420.00 General Liability (30.00 Water Utilities 5280.00 Electric Utilities 5339,0(! Subtotal: 510,500.00 Assessment Admirdstrafion and General Overhead (610.00 Del'upuency Contrngestcy SlLtl9 Grose Revenue Required: Si1,110.1102 Less: 92/93 District Gnyover _ <56.130.00> Total Revenue Required: 980.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted §1,100.00 for a Mandatory A.D.A (Atnrrian's with Disabilitres Act) Survey. This Survey is required to evaluaM design defktencie9 in the tot bt for A.D.A compliance. Also budgeted la f1,200 tor~irrigatfon upgrades to replace risers w pop up hods, §600 (or landscape material renovaOon and f5i420 for Central Control irrigaOon upgrades. [1N1vTie: In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD MS was ft0R,78/A.U„Ode will incr~se to Si13.29 for the FY 93/94 to cover Ote average 9S% agricultural and the 7S% domestic tale increase in water ra6es Out is andcipaled from Use Cucamonga County Water DisMct. No new assessment units were arvtexed into the district Otis year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Rate/. Lad Use lWra ILug Rafe PaMr AU. Revenue Single Family Parcel 44 §113.29 1.0 §113.29 §4,980.00 AO H ~~ Qi w d 4 V y, O E--~ ~ ~ ~ O v v o z o z x v z~c6.~ cam.. m 0 z ~- d E- cn v r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~ William j q' eil, City Engineer 100 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Hngineer's RepoN Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) The FY 93/99 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No, 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in mmplianre wiM Me requirements of Artlck 1, Chapter 1, Division 5 of Me Streets and Highways Cade, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. b (LMD fib) repmsents landscape sites ltuoughout the Caryn Planned Community. 7hece sites are associated with ate0e within Mat district and as such any benefit derived from Sre landscape installation can be directly attributed b those parceb within Mat district Because of Mir, asseasrnents required for this district are charged to those parcels witldn that distrkt The various landscape riles in Caryn Mst are maintained by the district cauilt of parkways, median islands, and paseos and . The breakdown of mainlakred areas is as folbwa: 93/$3 83L~ Cmund Cover and 5lvubs 12.09 12.09 Tud 2.89 2.89 Community Trails 3,QQ 3,pp Total Area in LMD ab 17.89 Acres 1789 Ayes The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup Me parkways, median islurds end paseos are maintined under contract by a private landxape mein4rerce company, wh0e Me Community Tmils are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of Me budgeted mats for LMD rb am for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along wiM tree mainterance and certain irrigetlnn system repair and testing are performed Mrough a Contract Servkm Agreemen the City has wiM a private landscape maintenance company. The projected cosh to operate and mafnpin LMD AK are es follows: 1~1 Regular Payroll (7,7900.00 Fringe Aatefib 52,730.00 Mainlerwnce and Operations f5,5]00.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operafiore f1,910.(q Contract Services Landxape Maintenvtce f 165,250.00 Tree Maintenance f5,000.00 Capital Expenditurq Irrigation Upgrades ro Central Control f154,68i1.00 Landxape Plant Material Renovation 513,500.(p Capial Outlay/Equipment (1,500.00 General Liability ;2,730.00 Water Utilities (65,100.00 Elechic Utilitles f2eLl9,OQ Subtotal: (428,750.00 Assessment Adminisftatlon and General OverMad 526,870.00 Tax Delinquency 515.63Q.IIQ Subtotal: (41,900.00 Cores Revenue Required: (470,650.00 Less: 92 /93 District CarryWer _ <S781 A90.00> Tolai Revenue Required: 960.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted (154,680 (or irrigatlon upgrades to Central Control and 533,500 for landscape plant material renovation. The funds for thin renovation come from the cartyover of last 0xal year's district budget. Equipment purchases of (1,500 are budgeted for in 93/94. Au41Yl11: In the FY 92/93 the assessment raga for LMD i/6 was (243.%/A.U., this will increase to f246.97/A.U. for Me FY 93/94 ro cover the antldpated 9S% agricultural end the 7S% domestic water rote Increases hom C.C.W.D. to the district. No new asseeemenb unib were arutexed into the district this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the dlaMCh Unit No. of Rate/. Lard Use Tyne Units Rata Factrr AU. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 (246.97 1.0 (246.97 5288,960.W 102 E-~ fZ C~ w Q T --~ E~ w z ~- o ~~ d U 8 U C 2 .emu C~.~CCO C Z Q ~ w ~ o P° ~-+ 4 @-+ V7 U ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: William J eil, City Engineer 104 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repoli Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fi9ea1 Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape MaNteunce District No.7 (Etlwanda Nortlr) is Prepared in compliance with the requirement of Artkle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of Me Street and f-Eghways Code, Sbre of California (landsape and Lighting Act of 1972). Badr#mfad: Landaape Maintenarrce District No. 7 (LMD #7) represena landscape sites throughout the Etiwarda North area. The9e sires are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape instellatlar can be directly attributed m throe parcels within that district. lkcause of tltb, asseaamenb required for tlds dbtrkt are drarged m those parcels within that district The various bndscape sites in the Etiwanda North area tlut are mainbmed by the dbtrict consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trills and pasew. The breakdown of mambinea areas i9 as folknvs: ~~ ~~ Cound Cover and Shmbe 7.46 754 Turf 3.55 4.02 COrlrrr1Ur11ty Tail9 ~ 2.OLL Total Area in LMD M7 13A1 Acns 1356 Acres llte turf, ground rover and shrubs areas that nuke up the parkways, median islands and paxvs are mainbined under contract by a prlvare larrdecape mNnttsuraY company, while the Community Trait are maintained by the City's Park Mamtenence Crew. FBiffiaiLGaNa The majority of the budgeted cwt for LMD #7 ere for direct rtulntenuke o! mrf, growl cover and shrubs. These functions, along witlt tree mdnlaunce and cerbin irrigatbn system repair and testing ere performed through a Contact Servka Agreement the Gty has with a private landxape mainterunce company. The projected cosh m operate and maintain I.MD 47 are as fotlows: 1~ Regulaz Payroll 52,590.00 Fringe Benefits (910,00 Maintenance and C~peraadons SlOb90.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operatiore 51,330.00 Emergency & Routbce Vehicle & Equipment Rent! 5500.00 Contact Services Landscape and Ttee Maintatanoe 5737,490.00 Capital Expeditors Landscape Plant Material Renovations 530,000.00 Weed Abatement for N.E. Community Park Site 56,000.00 Capital Outlay /Equipment 5160.00 General Liability 53,930.00 Water Utilitis 517,470,00 Electric Utilitls 52!0.00 Subtotal: 5209,810.00 Assessment Administratlon and General Overhead 524b80.o0 Tax Delinquency Si5.1fi0.00 Subotal: 569,840.00 Grass Revenue Required: 5279b50.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit _ S23A10.00 Tonal Revalue Required: f30306D.W For 93/94 the district budgeted 530,000 for landscape plant matedal renovation and 56,000 for weed abecement at the Northeast l:nrnmurdty Psrk site. 'there is 5160 for equipment purchase budgeted for in 93/94. The lax delinqueuy in tun anaunt of 545,080.00, ntpresetb the amount of unpaid taxes within the district In Bra FY 92/93 Ote asssanrent race for LMD M7 was 5305.43/A.U.,thb will increase ro 5307,05 for the FY 93/94 ro cove the anticipated 9S% egrkullunl and the 75% domestlc rate increase in water rats from Cucamonga County Water CNStrlct. The following itemizes the essssment rate for tlce district Unit No. of Rate/. Ids Use Tme ihib Rafe Faclcr A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 987.00 5307.05 1.0 5307.05 30303 ,W 1W z~ ~z ~~ `-'oz o ~ oC c z ~ a W U Cs., ~ O 2 C~/J ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Engineer ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Arca) The P1 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance Dbtrict No.B (SouM Etiwarda Area) b prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of die Street and Highways Code, State of Caiifomia (landscape and Lighting Ark of 1971). Ianduape Maintenance Distrkt No. B (LMD aB) represent brrderape sites throughout the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated w1Ur areas wlMkt that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape irotelletion can be directly attributed to those parcels withut that district. Beaux of Ihls, assessment required for thb district are Barged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South fitiwanda area that are rtaintalned by the district consist of parkways, median islands, Community Toils and paseos. The brgkdown of mainained areas is as folknvs: 92L$f Sl/3! Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.23 0.23 Turf 0.06 0.06 Community Trait p,(g ppp Total Arca in I.MD MS 0.29 Acres 029 Aaes The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are mainbirted under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, wNle the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Mainlerance Crew. The majority of the budgeted ousts for LMD 08 are (or direr! mainteance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. 'These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigatbn system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape rtainterar>ce company, The projected cosh b operate and mainbin LMD ~1g are u follows: 1^" Regular Payroll 1A0.110 Fringe 8arefib f10.(p Mamlenance and Operations f890.(10 Vehicle Maintenance and Operatlore 5370.00 Contingency Tree Replacmimt Sp,00 Contract Services fg85p,Op Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation 51,200.00 Irrigation Upgrades ro Central Control (4,700.00 Capital Outlay / Equipment ff160.00 General Liability 5140.00 Water Utilities f770.00 Ele[hie Utilities ~(~ Subrobl: f18,210.00 Assesmau Admvdstration and General overlwad fl,etlo.oo Detlrquency Cantingaxy ~gp,Op Subtobl: 51,900.00 Gte~Revenue Required: (20,110.00 [.ass: 92/93 District Carryover _ <t3.760.00> Total Revenue Required: S16a50,W For 93/94 the district budgeted f1,2oo.0o for plant rerovatlon and f4,700 for irrigatlon upgrade to Crmhal Control as capital improvematt projecb, a portlan of tlsese funds are cerrywer from last fiscal year's district budget Equipment purchases of f1(A are budgeted (or in 93/94. The tax delinquency in an amount of 5100.00, repreaenb the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. In the PY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD lB wu f150A5/A.U.,thb rate will increase ro f151.45 for the FY 93/91, This incrnse in the assersment rate b needed ro cover the average 8S% ircreaae in water rates that are antldpabed from Cucamonga County Wabr Diatrke ro the dishict. The following itemizes the assessment robe for the district Unit No, of Rate/. ImdLba '[Ime s,a, liar Far1r AU Smgte Family Parcel 108.00 f151.45 1.0 (151.45 16 .00 110 Qi V-=~ ~- ~i w z z ~ ~ z ~ o ~ U 6 UO2 U Q.: ice.-. 06P.,wU Cv W O d ~--~ U ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ s~ ~1 ~€ ~ ~ url'z Or' RANCHO CUCA.~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2,1993 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: WilBam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONDUCI1NG THE SECOND OF THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS PERTAINING TO 7HE LEW OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS W[iFTBV STREEF LIGHTWG MABJTENANCE DISTRICT' NOS. 1, 2, 3, ~ 5 6 7 k 8. It b recommended that City Coursc0 conduct Ute second public hmrirtg pertainbtg to the levy of annual assesamenb within Street Lighting Maintenance Dbfrict Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8. BA K •RO ~D/ANp YCIC• This is the second of three public hearings to be candtscled by City Council relevant ro the lery of annual assessment within the Street Lightng Maintenance District. The third publk hearing wBl be held on June 16, 1993 at which tlme City Council wi8 be asked to tke action approving the Annual Engineer's Report and atbliah the assessment ntea for the noted Street Lighting Maintenance District (or Ute Foal Year 1993/94, Below is an itemized analysis on a district by disMct basis. To summarize, electricity dtarges are expected to decease for a6 diatdcb, due a a projected rate decrease by Soutltem California Edison of 3.1%. Even Haugh the Edison rates are being reduced ffiia budget year, Rte assessment rates are being increased to cover tbe actual cost of Ute dbtrkb. N prior yest Sbte Gas Tax Funds were used to subsidize Rte district and artificially keep sasesament rates low. By increasing the rates shown in Bch PreBminary Engineer's Report, the district will be abk to stand on its own without additlond fording from other sources. U some disfeicb Here is an increase N the number of street light being mainlined which alto affects Rte assessment rate. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the app8cable dlatrkb. Tn addition, Operatans and Maintenance charge for traffic sigstab, which l prbr ynra were paid by State Gas Tax funds, wi8 aLw be home by Use appikabk diaMcb. In past yeah any avallabk prior year carryover was used to keep aaseasmenb bebw the annual auesament revenue requirement. In some distrkb this prtywer no longer exbb restating b an incrmse in Rte assessment rate. The following, in conjunctlon witlt rekrence l Rte PreBmirwy Engineer s Reports, identifies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compared with current PY 92/93 rates and justification for those proposed rates. The Prelirnbury Engineer's Reporo identifies the required budget for each diatrkt and any carryover used to reduce rates, $I[CE[ LRblillg Mains 0J9Jilct j`Jp, l- At3edd An assessment increase la recommended In thb dbfrict, from 513.81 to 517.77 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This is primarily due fo an Incrdse in Electric UHlitks cab prevbttly home by Stale Cas Tax funds. 1~ sizes] Irghtioe maioteoaoce l~ rlu. 2. laral An assesamart vrcreax is recommended N this district. from 529.30 m 539.97 for Fisnl Year 1993/94. Electridty costs vsaeased over 580,000 m a ptjected annual cost of over 5200.000, tlrls is due m the faM that Gassers] Fwd and Sbce Gas Tax fords love subsidized the district a past years. ~yitMainl~~anrn l?la![It[jy0..~=~(IdO11d P~8ilOed nmm .oily An assessment increax is recommended to this district, from 529.74 m 545.75 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This increax is due m a projected increase b electridty web whidt were subsidized by State Cas Tax funds to past years and a bck of prbr year ouryover,• ~ Mainteoaocep14trk1Nal: T1~YIstaPlaooed r^^.. M assessment increax b recommended hr tlds dbtricq from 527.72 m 528.96 (or Fixal Yeu 1993/94. Prior year canyover fords evil] stlli be used m keep the rate bwer ttrar the armrW burden would require. However, tMx unywer funds w81 rot be avdlabce m future yeen. S1z~ LISh00g I11d1I17204000 IT19tr1G[ b0. S: ~lyU PIYOOCd An assessment inamx b recommeded N tlde district, from 533.19 m 534.60 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior yeu ®rryovaa are used Wa year m keep 8re nce down but wi8 be depleted and unavailable in 8re future. Sleet Lishtlng Mitmlt9eoce I2111dc1 Dfo. fi: ~mmac W LloduNdil An assessment increax b recormrerded hr thb dstrict, from 53121 m 557.40 for Pbral Yeu 1993/94. Prior year carryovers are not available this year m keep the ram down. Sleet Ltslltlog Maiutma0C8 DLStriC[ b4. Z . L40[16 Ettnuoda An assessment inaeax is rot recommended m tl+ie dbtrkt, the ram wig rasroin at 533.32 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This proposed rate b subsidiud with pcryover funds from prbr year. Skeet I~6 lffaiotcoaooe AJgdct fllrl. fl c Sintllt FJ(leraodl M aueasmert inaeaseb recoounerrded m thb dbtrkt, frotrr 512631 m 5193.75 for Fiaul Year 1993/94. This proposed ram is higher than the average Ilghting dietrkt due m a disproporttoruce number of street lig?tb m assesmmeat urdb. As more aexesmdst unib are annexed m the district it ie exptcted that the street IighFm-assewment unit wlll be reduced thereby reducing the assOerrrett ram. Aespectfulty sub ' ~~ Wm. Jce O'Nd City Fngtrreer Attachments: 113 Resolutlon FxeivNve Summary Annual Fneneer a Report 114 Annual Engineers Report. City of Rancho Cucamonga Street tight District No:1~. (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94. Approved: Willi Veit, City Engineer 115 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's RePoN Street Light Maintenance District No. l (Arterial Streets) The F1' 93/94 annual report for Street Light Mainterurce District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD Ni) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street light and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this diaMCt, being located on arterial street, have been determined b benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such throe msb associated wiM the maintenance and/or installation of the facaitip is assigned to tliis City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consbt of street light on arterial street and traffic sigrwle (or a portion theeof) on arterial street. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a mrxtition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historicaay, dte irtstalWtion of street light and traffic sigrab has not been funded with Street Light Dlatrict funds, however, this is permitted under the Landxape and Lighting Act of 1972, The majority of the budgeted cosh for SLD Mt is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for Maintenance and Operetloro. These funds are no longer available. Projected Maintenance and Operatioru coals are Inamsing by nearly f49,000 over last fiscal year due primarily te the fact that Gas Tax can no longer subsidize the dbtrict A tax delinquenty arrount b added te arrive at the Revenue Required te rreintain the district This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which b antlcipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipt. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD Ml areas follows: 116 Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations 518,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustrneu 55,470.00 General Liability ~~~.~ Electric Utilitip sl 5~ytfl(1 Operations and Capital Subtoml: 5211,990.00 Ass®smatt Administration and General Overtwad 5117,27.00 Tax Delinquency ~ y90 w Subtotal: 5163,660.00 Total Revenue Required: 5375,650.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit S34 930,00 A.sseasmau Revenue Required: 5410.380.00 OOiIX51C The most significant impacts on t11e proposed PY 93/94 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operatiore of nearly 549,000 due to the elimination of a prior yeah State Gas Tax subsidy, and an increase N the number of street lights and traffic signals. 124054 new assessment units have been annexed Into the district. Fir FY 93/94 the rate per assessment wit u 517.77. That is up 53.% (mm the FY 92/93 rate of 513.81. The following itemizes the assessment rate for tlu district Unit No. of Unit Rote/ Commerdal Acre 3,338.84 517.77 2 (35.54 5118,660.00 Single Family Parcel 16,426.00 517.77 1 517.77 52419~L~Q Total 10 50.00 1i~ ~-~ ~~ ~y i '~-~ '~+---~ "r-a ~~ ^~^~ I~ w ~~ ~~ ~-~-. ~~ ~~ ~' ~+ r~ E~ ~~ w r- .~ Q ~' r o F- ~ z d ~ U p U U p Z Z ~ p O U R'' Gam., ~ W U fs. W O Z ?~ d E-~ C/i C,~ ~~~ J N SL01 AMME%ATIONS ANNEXED ARNIE 1, 1992 iR 13298 15.72 AU ANNE%EO APRIL 1, 1992 TR 1A765 G1 AU ANNE%EO APRR 1, 1992 TR 14486 35 Au ANNE%EO 1V1Y b, 7992 iR 14407 114 AU ANNENED INT 6, 1992 IR /44071 13 AU ANNENED JDME 3, 1992 iR 14664 8 W ANNEXED OCTOBER i, 1992 OR 89-04 .43 AC ANNE%EO OCTOBER 7, 1992 9N 12959-7 18.27 AC ANNENED OCTOBEq 22, 1992 TR 14192 39 AU ANNENED NOVEMBER 18, 1992 RM 13724 30.29 AC ANNENED DECEMBER 2, 1992 PM 13724 72.3 AC ANNENED JAMIMRY 20, 1995 G.U.P. 90-18 4.08 AC AMNENEO JANUARY 20, 1997 iR 17759 56 AU ANMERED fEBRUMY 17, 1993 PM 1<318 S.4Y AC 119 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Ciry Engineer ]20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The F7 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Stretts) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Artlcle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Cafe, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD M2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or insWlation of street light and traffic signals located on local street tluoughout the City but excluding those auras already in a local maintenance dfsMct Gatere0y tltb azea encompasses the residential area of He City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determHed that He facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites ma'sntalned by the district consist of street Iighb on local streets and traffic sigwls (or a portion Hereof) on local streets generally were of Haven Avenue. Typically, street light are installed by private developtnatt as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be iretalled by development or as a City capita improvement project Historically, the installation of street light and traffic sigtub has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this Ls permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD M2 b for electricity diacges for the power to the street light and traffic signet N the amount of fZO1b70. In lfie past, State Gas Tax funds have been used m subsidize the electricity charges in this disMct These funds are no longer available and this is the reason for the 988,140 increase in elecMc utilitlea over last fiscal year. A tax delinquenry amount is added m arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district 'This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payment which b antlapated to occur during tY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipt. The prjoected cosh to operate and maintain SLD A2 are as follows: 122 $9yoaed MaLntenantt Bn ¢et fm 1994°" Total Personnel f9,980.OD Maintenance and Operations SS,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment (9,870.00 General Liability (2,650.00 ElecMc Utilities 5201.6700(1 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 5229,170.00 Assessmatt Admittiatration and General OverA~d f48,620.OD Tax Delinquency < 7 Tan 0n Subotal: 569,850.00 Total Revenue Required: 5299,020.00 Less: FY 92/93 Carryover ( W9.270.(1(Il Assessment Revenue Requved: 249 750.00 f The most significant impact on the proposed F7 93/94 budget o tlx inaeese in electricity costs of over (80,000 ro a projected annual cwt of over (200,000. H past yeah the asaeasmerd rate lead been subsidized by the General Pund or Sta4 Gas Tax funds, In future ymrs tlds will not be the case and as such will a(fett the district's assessmau rate. FY 93/94 A t Rate For FY 93/94 the rate per wsessmart unit is (39.97. That is up (10.67 from the FY 92/93 rate of (2930. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the distrfce Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Lab Use 7\mn FJ,u wo Pxtr A t R Commerdal Aae 224.(3 (39.97 2 579.94 (17,960.00 Single Family Parcel 5799.00 (39.97 1 (39.97 (271.790.00 Total 249 750.110 c~z E-~ ~-.~ E-- .__.. w w f~ L..7 E--~ •---, ~--~ w w Q ~~ ~z ~o V U V ~ ~ p ~ C1C. z 4 ~ oQC x c6.~ ~. pia' 0 H ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3L02 ANMEXAT IONS ANNEMED APgIL 1, 7992 iAAOT 14486 35 AU ANMEMEO JUNE 3, 1992 TR 14644 B AU AMNEMED OCTOBER 22, 1992 iR 1<192 39 AU ANNENED JANUARY ZD, 1993 iq 13739 36 AV Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Xear 1993/94 Apprrned: (~_ William . 'Neil, City Engineer 125 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual E:tgineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) The FY 93/99 annual report for Street Light Maintenance Distdct No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared N compliance with dte requirements of ANcle 4, Ctapta 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CaltfomW (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD M3) is used M fund We mainlertance and/or installation of street Hghb and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally lire area enrompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Rase Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has beat determined that Ne facilftres in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street light on local street acct traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the Victoria Planned Cornmunity. Typically, street lights are insblled by private development as a condition of a development projert's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the irutallatfon of street light end traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under Me Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD X3 is 5:r electricity charges for the power M the street lights and traffic signals M the amount of ova: f120,000. In the past, Smte Gas Tax funds have been used M subsidize rite eletdcity charges in this distdct. These (ands are no bnger available and this is the reason for Me f52,95o increase in elecMC utilities over the last fixal year. A tax delinquenty amount is added M arrive at the Revenue Required M maintain the district. Tftis is a projected amount of delinquency tax payment which b anticipated M occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipt. The projected cost to operate and maintain SLD M3 are as follows: 11+V Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations f0.00 Contrad Services Traffic Signal Adjustment f0.00 General Liability Sls7p,pp Electric Utilities 5124.610.Of1 Operations and Capital Subtotal: f125,It10.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 533,530.00 Tax Delinquency 525.910.00 Subtotal: 5108,000.00 Total Revenue Required: 5184,62U.OD Add; Defidt Recovery S2 790.00 Ass~smett Revenue Required: 5186.910.00 The most signi0cant impact on the proposed FY 93/94 budget rs the increase N eMetddty costs of over 550,000 M a projected annual cost of over ft20,000. !n pest yeah the assessment rate Fad been subsidized by the General Pund or Stale Gaq Tax funds. !n future yeah this will not be the case and as such will affect the dhtrictb assessment rate. No new assessment unib have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94the rate per assessment unit is 547.15. That is up 517.41 from the PY 92/93 rate of (29.74. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMCC Unit No. of Unit Rate) Lmd.Use_ '~~ne 11ri14 Rah Pxtr ~ 1 R en Commerdal Ane 97.53 f47.1S 2 594.30 59,200.00 Single Family Parcel 3769,00 547.15 1 $47.15 1177.710.00 Total 1; 06,910.00 J.la! c-~ ~-_., w w F i <--~ a z >- o ~~ ~Q U U C ~ z z d z ~ v w m 0 z ~- a E- rn U dd ~~F s ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: illiam J, il, Ciry Engineer 129 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Stree! Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Divisan 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landswpe and Lighting pct of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD ~t4) is used M fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Garerally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue- It 1•as been determined that the facilities in this district berrefit the properties wihin this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of sheet lighb on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within d>e Terta Vista Platmed Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not bear funded with Street Light District funds, however, this b permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the hudgeted costs for SLD N4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lighb and traffic signals in the amount of nearly f5B,f100. A taz delinquency amount is added m arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district This is a projected amount of delinquency tax paymenb which ie anticipated ro occur during PY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipb. The projected msb ro operate and maintain SLD M4 areas follows: iW Proposed Maintenance Bud¢et for 199L9a Total Personnel f44,36p,tp Maintenance and Operations 510,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustmeru f5,00D.00 General liability 5840.00 Capital Expenditures: Install Signal ®Terta Vista Pkwy & Church St. 5102,000.00 Electric Utilities 567.270.00 operations and Capital Subtotal: 5209,470.00 Assessment Admirdstradon and General Overhead 521,280.00 Tax Dellnquertcy 50.00 Subtotal: f21,280.00 Total Revenue Required: 5230,750.00 Less: FY 92/93 Carryover f 5107 AfN1.007 Assessment Revenue Required: 5128.950.00 ARi(YH14: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or SUte Gas Tax (ands. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate, 5101,800 of the district's fund balance will !i° towards the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Terta Vista Parkway and Church Street 504.79 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 93/94 Aaeeument Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 528.%. That to up f1.24 (mm Me FY 92/93 rate of 527.72. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMcu Unit No. of Unlt Rate/ [ad[Jse Jypp 11r41s Rale Facbr AU Revere Commercial Acre 923.38 528.96 2 557.92 f53A80.00 Single Family Parcel 2b26.00 528.96 1 f28.9fi 575.470.0L7 Total 12f 8.950.W ia1 w ~~ .-.a ~~, a~ ~~ ~o ~ U Q Z ~QG' ~2~ ~~ O ~~ ~~ v -.~- c ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~. sl o4 ANNElUT1U16 ANNEXED APRIL 1, 1992 TRACT 14365 41 AU AMNEXEO APRIL 1, 1992 TRACT 13296 15.72 W ANNEXED INY 6, 1992 iq 14407 114 AU ANNEXED W1Y 6, 1992 iR 14407-01 9 AU 1' Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Ciry Engineer 1~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street L1ght Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report (or Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliarce with the requirenumb of Article 4, Chapter 1, Divisan 5 of the Streeb and Flighways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting pct of 1971). Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD YS is used to fund the maintena«e and/or installation of street lighb and traffic signals 1«aled wiltlin the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area a«ompasses the azea of IM City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of FEghland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within thLs area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street fighb on local streeb and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on I«al streeb within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street Iighb aze instilled by private development as a condition of a development projects approval. Traffic signals tan be instilled by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the instalation of street lighb and traffic sigruls has not been funded with Street Light IRatrict funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD MS is for electricity charges for Me power tm the street lighb and traffic signals bl Ute amount o(wer 527,000. Funds carried over from the 92/93 Fiscal Year vr311 allow the district to instill missing street lights on R«hester Avenue and Banyan Street. A tax delinquency amount is added to arive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax paymenu which is anticipated ro «cur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tix receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD A5 are a9 follows: I C ~Rposed Maintenance B +d t (n 799aa+e Tofai Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations 532,7&1.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50.00 General Liability Sg80,p0 Capital Expenditures: Street Light Installation 529,2011.00 Electric U0lities 52773!1.110 Operations and Capital Submtal: 564,790,00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead f9,100.00 Deluquency Contingenry 5290.00 Submpl: 59,340.00 Total Revenue Required: 574,130.00 Less: FY 92/93 Carryover ( 5.33.610.(Illl Assessment Revenue Required: 540520.00 ALilY8I41 There are fro substantial increases v1 the disMct's budget. In past yan the assessment rate had Veen subsidized by the Gatarai Fund or Stale Gas Tax funds. m future yean this wIB not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 524,220 of the district's fund balance will be used to install missing sheet lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. No new assessment units have been annexed inm the district For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 534.60. That is up 51.41 from the FY 92/93 rate of 533.19. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ladlhe Tvoe L1nir. R En Faax• f I R Single Family Parcel 1,1jj,QQ 534,60 1 534.60 f40.52n.00 Total 1,171.00 540520.110 1° E-~ .-, w w r ~ •---~ E~ ~~ ~~ w Q z >- o ~z .~ 0 U U C 2 z z w w c=., ca o a F ~ U ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 O'Neil, City Engineer 1~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annnal Engineers Report Street Light Maintenance Distrito No. 6 (Commerci:Ulnd usfriap The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industriaq b prepared k compliutce with the requirenrenb of Artkk 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streeb arxl Highways Code, Sbk of Ggfomia (landxape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Mainte~nce District No. 6 (SLD 16) b used to fund the melntenanrn and/or inabllatlon of street lighb and traffic sigtuls located on commercial and industrial atreeb throughout the City but excluding Mox arena dready in a local maintenance dbtrict Ge~adty Mis area encompaasd Me induatrid of the Gty aouM of pooM01 Boulevard. It has beat determined Mat Me fecilltres within this distrkt benefit Mb ara of dte Gty. The sites mavrtained by dte dbtdct conabt of atreN Bghb on indwtrial or coeunncisl atreda and traffic signela (or a portion tliereof) on iMwfrW or commercial street genengy aouM of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street light are instilled by private devebpman u a cotditlon of a development project's approval. Traffic signaa can be installed by devebpmern or as a City capital improvanern project. Hisrorica0y, the irbtailatlon of street Iighb snd traffic signals h+., .:c: beat funded wiM Street Light District funds, however, Min b permiteed under Ute landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted cwt (or SLD dG b for electrkity charges (or the power to the street lights aM traffk signals N Me amount of over 576,000. A tax ddbtquenty amount b added to arrive at the Revenue Required b maintain tlw dlrtrkL this b a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which b anticipated to occur during F1' 93/94 bared upon actual tax receipt. The projected aosb b operak and tnainfeln SLD K arc as folbsvs: 139 Total Persormvl Maintenance and Operatiore Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric UOlities Maintenance & Operations Subtotal: Assessmart Admmietratian and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtohl: Total Revenue Required: Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit Asset Revenue Required: f7,480.00 f2,50(1,00 56,580.00 5310.00 S16A00.00 f33k70.00 f5,370A0 55.]70.00 SIO,540.00 541,210.00 u7.39o.00 Ao11T>fla: There are no significant bur~aea b the budget in peat yeah the assessment rate hsd been subsidised by the Ceneol Furl or Sate Gas Tu funds. )n future yen Uda will not be the case and as such will affect the dbtrkt's assessment rase. 7037 new aasesemmt unib have base annexed inb the disfricL For FY 93/94 Ure rate per assessment uNt Is 551A0. slut h up 52(1.19 from the FY 92/93 rate of 531.21. The folbwing itemizes the asseument rsh for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ IadLlz ~'FC 6.a. Rrir A 1 [nda_trial/ amrn Acre 921.98 551.10 1 551.10 Total ~ffi'~ ;47,390.00 1~ ...~ E-~ w Q w i--~-1 ~---M E-' ~~ ~~ ~y w w 6 Z ?" o z ~ p 4 0 U ~' ° z z C C~ U Lr. W O Z T^ d E-~ C/7 ~U ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ a~ s ~ 5106 MNENAT IONS ANNEXED OCTOBER 7, 1992 OR 89-Ob .43 M ANNE%ED OCiOBEp 7, 7992 RM 12959-1 ID.27 A[ ANME%ED MWEINIEp 18, 1992 PN 13Rf 30.29 AC ANNE%EO DECEMBER 2, 7992 MM 13T2< 72.3 AC ANNE%ED JMOMY 20, 1993 C.u.9. 9078 4.OB AC MME%ED FEBRWRT 77, 1995 9M Ti31B 3.47 AC 142 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer 143 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) The Fl' 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is Prepared in rnmpHarue witlt the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streeb and Highways Code, State of C,alifomia (Landscape and Lighting Act cf 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD 47) is used m fund Ne maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals I«ated on 1«al streets in what is tented the North Etiwanda area of Me City. Gerterally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and not1h of Highland Avenue within Hte incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in Mis district benefit the properties within tltis area of the City. The sites maintained by the disMct consist of street lights on 1«al streeb and traffic signals (or a portion tltereo~ on local streeb within the North Etiwanda area, Typically, street lighb are installed by privace development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be instilled by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the iretallaHon of sheet lighb and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is penNHed tender the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD 117 b for elecMCity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over f11,000. A tiz delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required b maintain the disMct. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to «cur during pY 93/94 based upon actual taz receipb. The projected msb to operate and maintain SLD N7 are as fellows: 1'! t Tolel Persormel f0.00 Maintenance and Operations (200.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal AdjuatmaN 50.00 General Liability (170.00 Electric Utilities f1t.770.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: f12,190.OD Assessmart Administration and General Overhead (4,620.00 Tax Delinquency 54370.00 Subtotal: 58,930.OU Total Revenue Required: 521,070.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover <51.040.111A Assessment Revenue Required: f20A30.00 A~i1Y414: There are rro sigificant increases in the budget. A fund balance carryover of f1,040.00 is available to keep the assessment rate the name as last fiscal year. No new asseument unib have been annexed into the district thia year. For FY 93/94 the race per assessment unit is (3332. There h no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 92/93 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for Me district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Family Parcel fiQL9Q fA1.00 1 f33.32 trz0.~ 20 030'(16 145 E--~ U w 'Q ~~ ~~ ~_~ Q; E-~ ~---~ r""~ d ~ ~ O ~ ~ Z C .'-- p ~ Q U p Z Z UA-'F~ 6 qG ~ U fs. W O Z Er C] V ~~~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District Na. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: 147 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Artlcle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and highways Code, Sfate of l:alifomia (Iandsrape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installatlon of street lighb and traffic signals located on local streets in what b lemmd the South Etiwanda area of fhe City. Garerally this area encompasses the area of dte City east oI Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determintd that the farilities N this district benefit the propertles within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district conafst of street Bghb on Iocal street and traffic signals (or a portion tltereof) on local streets within the South Efiwuda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a conditlon of a develapmen project's approval. Traffic signals can be insbHed by development or v a City capital improvement project. Historically, the inaWiation of street light and Traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District fords, however, tlsb is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD M8 b far electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of ready f4,000. q lax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tar payments which Is antldpaled to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipt. The projected cosh to operate and maintain SLD 48 areas follows: 1'' Total Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations 5130.00 Contract Services Traffic SigrW Adjushrrad 50.00 General Liability f50.0p Electric Utilities 139611.00 Opewdons and Capital Subtotal: 54,040.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead f720.00 Taz Delinquerry 540.110 Subtotal: 5760.00 Total Revenue Required: 54,810.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit 62.170.1111 Assessnrart Revenue Required: 56,980.00 ARalYa15: In FY 91/92 Mere was only ore parcel paying into SLD K8. In the FY 93/94, 35 additional parcels were added to the district rtaking a total of 36. 35 of these parcels are owned by ore company, the devebper, Citation Homes, 6rc. No new assessment orals have been annexed into Me district Mis fixal year. For FY 93/94 Me rate per arsessment unit is 593.75. That U up (67.44 from the FY 92/93 rate of f12631 . The following itemizes the assessment rate for U1e distrkt Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ladlJse Tune Ls.r. R FaAr r Single Family Parcel ~,QQ 5193.75 1 f193.75 SG.990.0(! Total 36.00 56,980.00 1'6.7 U C~ w W ~-~-, ~---~ N ~-~-, _~ :/] v z ~ ~°s. ~ c "°z z ~z w o m ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of Che City Council Jack Las, AICP, City Mana 9er FROM: Hrad Huller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF TRHH REMOVAL PERMIT 92-1d - HOWELL - Appeal of the Planning Coemission's decision denying a request to remove two Eucalyptus trees located on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop, west of Rock Rose Avenue - APN: 227-411-42 A&[bM1~7DASI0A The Planning Commis aion recommends that the City Council deny Tree Removal Permit No. 92-14 through minute action. On December 2, 1992, the City Council conducted a hearing on the request to remove two Eucalyptus trees within the City's street tree easement. After receiving testimony, the Council continued the hearing to determine if the recently completed tris®ing would correct Lhe prob ism and to see if options were available instead of tree removal. ANALSSIS Since the December hearing, the Public Works Division hoe been monitoring the trees on a bimonthly basis. They have determined that the trees are in excellent structural condition and currently pose no observable safety hazard (bee Exhibit "A"). Additionally, because the trees are in good health and they carry out the theme for the loop streets within the Victoria Planned Cosmninity and the overall Etiwanda community, alternate tree species were nit considered for replacement. Therefore, staff recommends against removal of the trees. City HH:SM:ep Attachments: Exhibit "A^ - Memorandum dated March 17, 1993 Exhibit "B^ - City Council Minutes dnted December 2, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Staff Report dated November 4, 1992 151 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 1993 TO: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer FROM: Jeff Barnes, Parks i Landscape Maintenance SUBJECT: STATUS OP TMO E[ICAI.YPSSIS 141gE8 I9 TB Approximately four months ago, City crews pruned the two eucalyptus trees in the North Victoria Windrows Loop parkway adjacent to the Howell residence at 6599 Elderberry. After the pruning was completed, the trees were inspected and found to be in ezcellent structural condition. Because of the homeowner's request for removal of these trees, Curt Lance and I have inepectad the trees on s semimonthly schedule and have found them to be sate trees, representative of the species. They are in fact some of the better specimens along the parkway. I spoke with Mrs. Howell on the telephone last Thursday, and asked her if she was satisfied with the pruning work done to the trees. She said she was, but wanted the City to prone more frequently to control the amount of leaves Palling into her yard. I should mention, that she has a medium vise Eucalyptus groaing in her backyard. These two trees pose no current observable safety hasards to public or private property or persona, and I cannot recommend !heir removal for any other purpose. JB:la cc: Bob Zetterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manaq Curt Lance, Maintenance Supervisor, Trees f.-Xf//b'7 i4 "152 ..., ... City ColRwii Minuws Ocember 2,1992 Page 5 MOTION: Movd by Buque4 seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92-297. Motion cartid unanimously, 5-0. G. PII6LIC HEARINGS GI. ~GNCID RATION OF TRFF REMOVAL PERMIT 92 I4 HOWL -Appeal of the Planting Conunission's dectitian denying a request b remove two Erazlypms vas IocarA on the north side of NaM Viuaia WiMrows loop, west of Rack Rox Avenm - AFN: 227+111-42. (Coatioud from November 18, 1992) Staff'repal ptecenwd by Soon MtRphy, Associew Planner, vent alto prcxnted a video. Cwrailmemha Gudertez acted shoo[ dw mainwtmrre schduk for the trees. la O'Neil, City Engiaer, coved it is about every five years a sooner if Waded. Maya Stan opened the mating for public hearing. Addmssmg the City Council wav: Rosutne Howell who staled dw trees had never ban rimmed sitwe Nay were planted in 1985 until she canplained m the Pknting Caaunisvort mating. She stall these are leaves and athu droppin8s dw taH is her yard all yam mood which mltinuWy make a mess on her concrete and pool. She did nor think Nis world seta prasdau if dw appeal was granted ilrre being no funlrr respottx, the public Irarhtg was ekaed Catrciimember Gutitva acrd if dorm had been a recortl of bercpnplaint atom the mainteunce of the Iran. la O'Neil, Ciry Engineer, staved tlwro wsn a record of canpuhm4 hot dot cuff was nor sum N the hegiming if the trees were in the tasetam a on Mrs. Howell's property. He added it was Wes daennbwd slut dw trees wcrc in the tasemen[ and Net the City steeps the respabibiliry fa the rnaiolettstree of Urrn. Cawrcilmembeu Aksartder askd if these was other types of eucalyptus trees Nm did nor Mop leaves u mceh as Mrs. Howell's did. Brad BWkr, Ciry Planar, crowd Uut sll types of tucalypnR tress drop Troves. Courwihtwmber BuQtla asked Why Brae eucalypm Was were sekad fa Nis arcs. Bud BWkr, Ciry Planar, scold becaltx dory are the hardiest Councilmembu Gutierrez soul he u concerned that Nu might set a precedent but is sympaNetic b Mrs. Howell's teGulSL Councilmemba Akxartder eskd if now IAat des tme has bail trimmed. it it helped the mess. Ms. HowaH Rath tor. She felt the silver dollar awalyptm wcuW nor be as massy. Comwiittrmba Alexander did rot fat rwmfonaMe with thu lanigh4 end wamd m look inb des rrtancf further. CoumBmembu Williams sod hLya Stout staved they bed previaudy looked a the aiw. ~iVI~Q '/ rrJ // li7J Ciry Camcil Minute '~ ..~ Ikcembc 2.1992 Page 6 Courtcilmembc WBliams felt the Ciry should look at all ttte uees in the easement m see if they ate appropriate for their location. Coate0member Gutkmz acted ff them have ban oNU complaints about Nis same type of problem. Brad BWkr, Ciry Planner. aural he knew of a halt dmrn then he had personally dealt with. Carrcilmunbet Buquet acted he was not k fawr of taking the tree aa, but fek the Ciry should do what they can m help minimize the ptobkm that the trace are causing. He tek it would take ooopention by botlk the City and Mrs. Howell. He suggested sell' look at thir furNv befon; something u decided, He felt thir sharN 6e looked at for an additional 90 days He fah the appeal should be denied, but for staff m work with Mts. Howell on a solution m the problem. Coarcilmembtt Gutiemz staled he would like m wait and ger more infonnatian before he decides, bW did not [al IIIC see Should be tipped OUL MOTION: MovW by Akwtder, seconded by Gurkrtez m continue the matter m the Minch 3.1993 meeting al 7:00 pm. Maion carved aunimaLtly, 5-0. ....rr were suhmiuod. . •.... I1. ~QZ{$(pj;g,~gN Or Fq~gh~(O A GR terra TACK FORG„F,.((~•.I Reporf) Mayor Smut stated he and Comb member Bugat cumendy serve the Law Enforcement Subcommittee. He sated dray ore castiderhrg fartnkg a ui Tark Face and Nit [mruliy agendized fa the December l6, 1992 mating m bring a proposal to We tcil on what ask Fora wood mnsist of and what its asks would be. He felt the Ciry already bar ore of the saoeu gaffiti removal programs o[ any Ciry anywhere k the valley, if rot the State of CaBfomn. He Mated it ely cosdy and Nee is uiB gnffiu that needs m M dealt wiN. He acted they wanted m hot beyond d appmxhes arM stet lacking inm mare non-aaditional appraechea. Cottncilmember Bugtta staled dre k that exists k 'N the peopk slut do stria and-social aaiviry does nor make it tary m came up a longterm solution. He scud way the juvenik propyn u now, atu a juvenile is ought heu only d ' not m do Nir again and kt go wiNau g done m help recover Ue Ciry's cost for the removei. He the penal code syMem doq not provide juvenik s b get lough and remedy Nia probkm. He acted for Council m alkw tike Subcommiua m wok wiN the City y m drag an ordinMtce m provide for fWl of abatement coM. Mayo S tike Ciry rteeds.wme medgd of geeing the graffiti removed if • popery ow es tKK wykt m assist tike pobkm arM charge dam fa the removal. He felt the City should he able m go an as tike C Weed Abtaerant Depanmatt does m get the gtaRitl removed wiNk 24 hour. 154 c;lix yr linrvi;ntJ uu~nrvlurvur~ STAFF REPORT DATE: November 4, 1992 TD: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AI CP, City Manager FROM: Hzad Huller, City Planner 8Y: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATIQT OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 92-10 - FIDWELL - Appeal of the Planning Co®iaeion's decision denying a request to remove too eucalyptus trees located on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop, neat of Rock Rose Avenue - APNi 227-411-42. IDSODMI~XIIPI The Planning Commission recoamends Uet the City Council deny Tree Removal Permit 92-ib through minute action. DIS'QJSBION on September 9, 1992, the Planning coamiaeion conducted a hearing to consider a request to remove too Med Gum Eucalyptus trees from the corner el de yard Of the single faintly residence owned by Ms. Howell. While being sympathetic to the concerns eapreaeed by Lhe applicant, the Commission determined that the tree removal was not c»neiatent pith the intent of the Tree Preservation Ordinance Por the following reasons: 1. The trees are located within a atrnet tree easement and, therefore, are City street trees. TRa decl eion of whether or not to remove the trees is the reapone16111ty of the City. 2. The trees are part of the established streetacepe theme for Victoria Windrows Loop, which cronsiste of a double roe of 6ucalyptue [zees straddling the sidewalk. 3• The trees were required to he installed ae a rnndition of approvel for devnlopment of the housing tract. 4. The installation of deciduous trees vould etl ll result in leaven dropping into the reez ynrd during the full eeeeon and continuing the maintenance problem. FM~.B/r ~~ ~ C CITY CO[RICIL STAFF R7SPORT TAP 92-16 - tlONELL November d, 1992 Page 2 5. Proper tri®ing of the trees would reduce or eliminate many of the concerns expressed by the applicant. The Commission asked that special consideration be given to tri®ing trees at the earliena opportunity. (Trees were trued the week of Septe~ber tl• 7992). As a result of these findings. the Planning Commission could not support the removal of the trees and denied the Tree Removal Permit applicntion• Respec lly sutmitt Brad uller City Planner BB:SM: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appeal Letter Exhibit "B" - Planning Co~ieeion Staff Report dated September 9r 7992 Exhibit "C" - Planning Co®ission Minutee dated September 9r 1992 156 CC~ Jac1( ~,~k . ~,~d ~u~ ~[liainr ~. September 16, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Debra Adams, City Clerk 105(10 Civic Center Drive Rancho Gtilcamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Tree Removal Permit 92-14 Dear Ms. Adams, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission denied my request for Tree Removal Pelmit 92-14 at thou meeting of September 9, 1992. I hereby state my intent to appeal their decision to the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. It was stated at the Planning Commission meeting that they do not have the authority to remove city planted trees. Ro a D. Howell 695 ~ i~t-best-~ e-~-. ~'-~ulo~rola~ U9- ~i 1~3~ C-1lu) x`19-ai~~ I ctTr. aF RAnu1D cucdnDeGA ~ <T141 T989~--1051 ~~3;fBL~°ii~P~i!±wW~1~ '~ IOl3 PLAI8IING FEEES 4126.00 PLAII 001111 APEgI fEE C.A. NOVEL 001-7VOi-7280-00000000 TOTAL DUE 1126.00 RECfiVED FRDIIt tdSRS ELOERBETfRY CT RC CA CKCR (126.00 ,.TOTAL~TE181E8ED 4126.00 CIIAN6E OUE (0.00 i' 157 fill I VP lCtilV liliV liU(,H1y1V1VVH STAF~~ REPORT GATE: September 9, 1992 TC: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner HY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SU&7 ECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 92-14 - HOWELL Appeal of the City Planner's decision denying a request to remove two eucalyptus trees locar ed on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop, west of Rock Aose Avenue - APN: 227-411-42. BACxGROlMO: On July 22, 1952, the City received a request to remove two eucalyptus trees from the south el de of an existing residence located at 6595 Elde [berry Court (see Exhibit "E"). In reviewing the request, staff determined the following: 1. The trees are defined as "Heritage Trees" by the Ttee Preservation Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 6ection 19.OH.030). 2. The trees were installed as a condition of approval for development of the housing tract. 3. The trees are part of the established atreetecape theme for the Victoria Windrows Loop which consists of a double row of eucalyptus trees straddling the sidewalk. 4. The trees are not interfering with any existing or proposed improvements or development. 5. The trees are in good health. 6. With proper maintenance, the risk of fire is minimal. Trimming of the trees w.i 11 further minimize the risk. 7. Proper trivming of the trees will reduce the leaves being dropped in the pool. Aa a result of this information, Tree Removal Permit No. 92-14 waa denied. Subsequently, the applicant filed an appeal with the Planning Conanission requesting consideration of the Tree Renaval Permit. ANALYSIS: The trees were planted to create r. special lendacepe theme along the northerly and southerly "Windrows Loop" collector streets. The treos behind the sidewalk were placed in a 4 1/2-foot, City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Maintenance Easement. Therefore, the trees in question 1C PLANNING COMNIESION STAFF REPORT TRP 92-14 - ROWELL September 9, 1992 Page 2 are public street trees intended to be maintained by the City. The appellant states that they desire to replace the trees with another variety; however, the Clty ie committed to maintaining the established theme of Red Gum Eucalyptus as evidenced by its ongoing replacement program. In their appeal letter (see Exhibit "A"), the applicant states that the trees represent an extreme fire hazard. The applicant references the recent 105-acre Etiwanda fire and the Oakland fire in which eucalyptus trees were involved. There are several important distinctions between those events and the present request for removal: Trees in the Etiwanda area are "Eucalyptus globulus^ (Blue Gum eucalyptus) and, ae noted by the applicant, were originally plnnted as wind breaks for the citrus crops. With the elimination and/or neglect of the citrus groves, the eucalyptus trees no longer receive regular watering. Aa a result, home of the trees have become very dry and brittle. Additionally, the trees are not aaintained in e fashion that would eliminate much of the fire potential (i.e., removing dead branches, cleaning up leaves under the tree, etc.) The location of the trees proposed for removal Sa within a corner side yard setback that does receive regular water. Also, the trees appear to be maintained fairly well in that no dead limbs or a large amount of leaves at the tree base were visible. The ground plane has been covered with river rock (by the homeowner). 2. There was a large amount of dry brush within the Etiwanda and Oakland fires that helped spread the flames at a rapid pace. The trees proposed for removal are located within a rockacape area surrounded by maintnined lawn, groundcover, end shrub ereae. All areas are green and appear to receive regular irrigation. A9 noted in the attached Sunset magazine article (see Exhibit "D^), information obtained after the Oakland fire indicnted that the eucalyptus trees posed no greater fire threat than many other tree species; and with regular mnintenance, the eucelypiua trees are as cafe as any other broad-leafed evergreen tree. The trees proposed for removal, ^EUCaiyptus enlmalduleneie^ (Red Gum eucalyptus), were not planted to protect trope from the wind. Rather, this species of eucalyptus was ealected because of its avi tabi lity and aesthetic value within street parkways. in conclusion, staff believes that the request to remove the two eucalyptus trees Se intone Setent with the intent of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the concerns expressed by the applicant cnn be addressed through proper maintenance of the trees rather than removal of the trees. 159 PLANNING COtR4ISSION STAFF ABPORT TRP 92-14 - NOWELL September 9, 1992 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the appeal of Tree Removal Permit 92-14 by minute action. Respectfully submitted, Hrad H ler City Planner BH:SM/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "B" - Letter Denyinq Tree Removal Permit 92-14 Exhibit "C" - Tree Removal Permit Exhibit "D" - Article by Joseph Y. Williamson Exhibit "E" - Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Photographs 160 August 10, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner Community Development Department Planning Division Subject: Tree Removal Permit 92-14 Dear Mr. Kroutil, CIiYu, /~. uJM PiA .:Inu DIL .ION AUG 12'1992 18i9dD ep. +~1~8~,5r" I have reviewed your August 3rd letter of denial for Tree Removal Permit 82-14'. In considering your letter, 1 wish to state the following: 1. "Eucalyptus" is defined as a large chiefly Australian evergreen vee, characterized by its ragged bark and yielding a volatile, pungent oil. 2. Eucatypms trees are commonly referred to as hvidow-makers" because of the extreme damage caused by falling debris. "Eucatypms leaves contain enough oil [o ignite without so much as a spazk. Heat from a nearby fire is sufficient. We've actually seen them explode. It almost acts as its own torch." These are quotes attributed to Fire Chief L Dennis Michael in the "Daily Bulletin" article of Juty 19, 1992. This same article continues with the following: 'The City is taking a particularly hard look at the area's rows of eucalyptus trees. Originalty planted to shield fruit orchards from the wind, the treesconMbuted to the spread of the July 6 fire" which burned 1(15-acres in Etiwanda. "City Hall has already agreed to waive it's tree-removal fees for Etiwanda residents andous to chop down eucalyptuses." 4. [n addition to the extreme fire hazard under "normal" wnditions, the Etiwanda area is the prime host of destructive winds which have reached 80 mph. Afire fueled try eucalyptus would be disastrous to our arcs. The vast devastation of the recent Oakland fire was atmbuted to the establishment of eucalyptus trees within and among residential homes. 5. Times have changed. Originally planted to proteM orchards from winds, the orchards are disappearing and communities have been established. Given the highty volatile and dangerous nature of the eucalyptus, 1 question simply the choice of tree planted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within the community of the "Victoria" tract. Not only the choice of planting, but removal of the homeowner's right to either replace or maintain. 161 Your letter sites the 'Tree Preservafion Ordinance" and "the planting of trees as a condition of approval for development of the housing tract". As a homeowner who wishes to contnbute to the beauty and safety of our community, [ simpty wish to exercise the privilege to replace the two eucalypms trees on my property with any other type of tree. Unlike most trees, eucalyptus also shed contlnually, all year azound. I have enclosed photographs of the mess they make each and every day to our back yard. As the wind blown gentry each evening, dtese pees "rain" leaves into our back yard. It is impossible to keep it maintained in a proper manner. Your letter also states that with proper maintenance, the risk of fire is minimal and that proper trimming wID reduce the leaves dropping in our pool. Since the planting of these particular trees in 1985, they have never been trimmed and now reach a height of at least 75 feet and still growing like weeds In the past, I have made repeated calls to the City Yard to request trimming. I have personalty watched the City employees trim smaller trees between the sidewalk and the curb, but each time, they choose to bypass the trees on our lot, possibly because of their size. Our immediate neighbor at 6598 Elderberry Ct. has eucalyptus leaves dangling directty over their chimney vent on a composition style roof. It ha; never F,cen maictai: ed by the Cit•,~ of Rancho Cucamcw¢a. I bave noticed the annual tree trimming on Basil, a few blocks from our home. A fine job is done each Spring as they are cut way back; however, City trimming of trees appears to be very sporadic. After careful consideration over the years, my contention is no longer over tree trimmirg, but rather tree removal. I request their removal for two reasons: I. They do no allow me as a proud homeowner, to care for my property in the manner N which I would like. 2. They are an undeniable fire hazard As stated in my permit request for removal, I am more than happy to replace them with another kind of tree. My sincere hope is that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will graciously allow the homeowner the privilege of planting and maintaining another tree of choice on their own property. Any other tree of choice, made even by the Planning Commission, would be readily accepted. I'm confident that you also have the beautification and safety of fhe City of Rancho Cucamonga foremost in your minds as you struggle with these issues. [ thank you for this second reconsideration and await your reply rely, ^I I , M1~~1 i oxanne D. Howell iV` T H E C I T V O p R t1 N C 1-I O C U C t1 M O N G t~ August 3,' 1992 Roxanne Howell 6595 Elderberry Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 EUHJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 92-14 Dear Ms. Howell: The planning Division has completed its review of pour request to remove 2 Eucalyptus trees on the south side of your lot, adjacent to Victoria Windrows Loop. In considering your request, eta £f has determined the following: 1. The trees are defined ae "Heritage Trees" by the Tree Preservation Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Munlclpel Code Section 79.08.030). 2. The trees were installed ea a condition of approval for development of the housing tract. 3• The trees are pert of the eetabliehed etreetecape theme for Vletorin Windrows Loop, which consists of the double row of Hucalyptue trees along the sidewalk. d. The trees are not interfering with any existing or proposed improvements oz development. 5. The trees era in good health. 6. With proper mnintainance, the risk of fire is minimal. Trimming the trees x111 further minimize the risk. 7. Proper trimning of the tress will reduce the leaves being dropped in the pool. Based on thi9 information, staff finds ineutficient grounds to grant approval of the Tree Removal Permit• A0 a result, Tree Removal Permit 82-14 has been denied. Thi9 actions shall become final unless an appeal is filed with the Secretary of the Planning Commission within 10 days of the date of this letter. Any appeal moat be submitted in writing and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. Moyp Dennrs 1. Stool Councilmember Diane VJilllams Mayor Pro-iem William J. Alexander CounNlmember Pgmelo J. Wrighf Jack Lam. AICP, Ciry Manager Councilmember Chatles J. Buquef II - N',/B,y g rI f0;A0 Cvrc Canter Urea • PO Box 907 Roncno fucmnrongm. CA 9V29 . (714)089.1851 • oAx (714; r9ly~rt~ ~ .,' ~.. Ln i Z Z Z Q J I-- Z W LlJ 0 Z O U LL H Z W Q a City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Removal Permit NON•DEVELOPMENT ~ 4L -ice GENERAL INFORMATION LESS THAN 5 TREES OR 50' LINEAR FEET OF WINDROW Ortlinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single Trunk circumference of fifteen (15) inches or more and multi~irunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty four (24) inches from ground levee, without ?first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: C LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: b~S9 J~ G,A.N.Y~£S'1r~J G't'• ( Sew, NAME,ADDRESS. TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: ~O`~+.rr.Q_ ~•O\A)Q.l~, . c 1 /~ C {~r~ggi~,~dle t7F Wis.! /, GT~41Q rw r~{1" •' 1"~~~g, NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): REASONS FOR RE~IOVA~1attach ngcessary sheets): / / 5helokT\~ ~S. 1~J~5 Ca hVA1 b--~ G ~g a . E'xh-ev-a h~e.r. ~;re~ 1,azavbA ~- r-- ~-- PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: ~'~r~,~ Ah ? c.T Tra Qum~~wclltr~$ •}p-teplw 0 APPLICANT'S SIGNATU~_ DATE:?=~ ~Ca- ADDITIONAL FILING REQUIREMENTS 0.~' ~ This application shall include a plot plan Intlicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, number, and size of the trees to De removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ACTION - EvUurtlon of tAlr rppneNlon Ir Mrrd oD 1M arltrilr ai lM rrwnr rldr. C APPROVED By'-- Date: DENIED ~~ Reasons: S~ ~`-~~ _._. The permit shall be valitl for a period of ninety (90) days, unless an extension is requested fourteen (14) days prior to the expiration of the permit. TRP 92 TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF: 7. Condition of the trees? [.4l~D-~.YCELGlXI'. 2. Any safety hazards to persons, adjacent property or utility installations? A'C/vE 1Na> aR~ ~c,{d/Ly /ANN/iG/rM1BGE_ 3 . Any conflict with proposetl improvements? N~ 4. Proximity of otherirees in the area? O/l~"R /y~+T DV '~~ W/N~~~ ~P f Rvtr.4asE'. 5 . Effect of tree removal on the aesthetics of the area and the public health, safety and welfare. RCwlo Y•I[ leulo f~]/.OBC13'N iR~cK>FM'FeK RrstJarAG 4~ ~ W AREA . 6 . Are any of the trees required to De preserve Dy any specific plan, condition of approval, or historic landmark designation? 7ALRS AU.?fALLdW A3 ~7lPl Li1~ lJ.4fLt3G9ifY~+ /AC ~~ZOfG .wn .~smsv.,sis~s fNHNC L'oP w~clrpeokU_(~cb~. 7 . Is an arDOrist required? ~ n,... . DECISION: - G Bo N4 'A ~ MU ~ ~6kDYA1 9' 1CLat5 /YOiIIO __ I E Li / W/ J/ DATE: ~t8.9t EVALUATED BY: 166 A FINAL NOTE: DON'T BLAME THE EUCALYPTUS •~ URIN(i THE afternoon of October i 20, when IFe Oakland-Berkeley hills fire was urging al its fiercest. I was driving from Monterey ro San Francisco and hearing about it on the car radio. One very concerned informant, claiming previous (orestn' experience, repeated- ly got on one station and ar- gued wish intensity Thal since the grove of eucalyptus trees just east of the Claremont Reson Hotel and Spa would soon explode into flames, and the hotel would then burn with it, the trees should im- mediately be chain-sax~ed down. He sounded genuinely terrified. It turns out the real fire fighters on the scene never planned to gel rid o(th< trees. Instead, thanks to their cellent fire hose xork, plus nelpful cix'ilians, both the eu- calyptus grove and the hotel mmain in tact. This pleases me immensel}. In 21 years zs .Sunset's garden editor. I came Io respect and admire the eucal}'plus trees of Cali- fornia and Arizona. N'ilh this tree, it seems you either love it or fear and hate it. And I've noticed that (hose xha (cur the tree seem almost irrational about il. IGencrail)'. These same people s«m to know little about tins or Irccs.) During the aftern can and evening of the fire and in the du), and xcek. That followed. reporters and citizens repeat- edly characterized the trees as explosivel. flammable haz- ards-inooe eau, likening them to huge. open tanks of gasoline But they were wrong. A (ex messy types of eucalyptus need to have their debris cleaned every year or two, but notes of other kinds are as orderly and as safe as any other broad-leafed ever- green tree. 1\ DEFENSE OF T:IE TREE When the dry, low eleva- tions of California and Ari- zona were issued their trees. they just didn't get anything tall and unthirsty. Australia's dry lands did-so we began growing their eucalyptus, for a number of purposes, some 135 years ago. From the start, many peo- plc found them beautiful and useful. From any viewing dis- lance,thc muscular trunks and branches holding clouds of dark leares ugui nst the sky make an inspiring picture. Rows and groves of rhea willing, up-to-200-foot-all gi- ants were planted to comb the meanness out of California's prevailing summer e(ternoon westerlies. Growers from the Salinas Valley to the Oxnard Plain, and homwwners from the 1<e flanks of San Franeis- cn's Presidio to the Irvine Ranch and Torrey Pines Mesa found them definitely satisfying to live with. The older cuts (generally, those planted before 1950) are strong; they don't blow or fall over more readily than any other kind of tree. Theca early cues were planted as seedlings from flats--their roots never encountering sides of containers-and so today have natural, not kinked or bent, root systems. Th<s< grand trees also sup- plied shade, soil stabilization, firex~ood, and pulpwood. Earl)-century ranchers made the mov of the big cuts' stump-sprouting thorn. ens- sic Th<}''d cut doxn a huge tree for firewood; its stump would grow many new sprouts, and in uveral years the few strongest sprouts would have grown big enough l0 bC CUI fOI fir<wppd. W.EAIV ITS LITTER, AN'D FILL DO FINE Even in regard to fires, the eucalyptus's faults turn out to M manageable. The main problem is that the dead kaves and litter that gather berteath the blue gums (E. gfobufus) and a few other tall kinds-E. cladoralpx. E. ru- dis, and E. viminalis-can became fact much more easi- ly than living leaves and branches can. ((maintained. however, then tall cuts are no more or less combustible than any other species. Re- move all branches between the ground and 20 feet up. and clean up the litter every year or two, before the fire season begins. If you're plant- ing anew euc, choose lrom the many kinds that don't make liner. When fire hits, people look to blame somethlo, and the eucalyptus-big, c.;ueable, imposing--makes quite a tar- get. But in a hot, dry 40-mph wind like Oakland's last Oc- tober, everything in the plain kingdom burns quickly. Even in the slower-mm~ing fires that burned in the lower hills that night, evidence colketed afterward shored that the cuts burned to no greater de- gree than other species-re- gardless of what the excited voitt of the man on the radio might have said, gr lnsrph F N'illiomsnn LiY//gar rV t/ 166 (~a5 ~ 1~,~b~ C-t-- ~-i=iwo~o~~ Gfl- `~ 1~3 °~ ~~i~+) 8~°I-a1~Fr H~ i~hl arn1 •R~er .-...~.~~...w lnvrl. R 0 G K R 0 s E ~~ ~~ X ~~ rc~or~5 "f•W 0 J OCO.•i-i OhS 6'f" WGa1~~t.IS• "~'~25. P~o•} h -t~5 0.'~- .~ mr, c~ to pQx~t-~.}._ ~ Vi' v.~-c'e- P 0.r e c~t~ o~.pl o~ ~es. `~wey a<e.~ e~tre~.~~ ~.•ess ~~,r~ ~` fire hv,Z.ordl ~ ~ ~vr v ex~ ~ a~ ~lo~-- Qcsx``~`tey ~a ~e-~ L . ~ goo . . _ ~ _ _e-~r--+-~-~ ~~ FYM/J~"I' ~. 6'1 ~ic-F6rio. ~/~J ~~~15 ~.--00(I~ E~~~r z~~ ~i° j2- ~ sqs ~d~~-~, ~: ~NISIT f~ 0 N ~~~ 3 _.... r a r~ J ~,. f ~~. `. r I~ C a~i~ J 'r R r ~ f w ~ ^•v~ x o ~" ~ ~ pr V~ ~J r Y fY)3,~T5~ N~ _~ 6 C- N C I }L~NS :a.~~ .Z6'961I 3..'Ib.La.Otl ~ r o~ = N _< ~~~: ~AA~~I~ J /: r'!'. 1 W c ~ .~.~i3S ~ z leg 1- o ~ ~w~a •- r W ~~~ "° ~~~~g y~` Y ~ U S S_ J w O ~ ~ 4 ~ 1 j `~ r~ uu~l ~~ 1 u y!Nt ~ ~ ~ c W K~~~~~ ~~_ uy w r 0 Z O IV i~ u; ~ u ~ ~ ~~~~~~ a~ l i pp s ` t u~ ~t W ~w 2~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ FO~~~ ,y W a ~~iSSS ~ ~ ~ ` - r S ! j ~ ; ~ ;yy ~ wR y`y;yypu y~yF~y{. 1N +~ ~ ~ ~i Q. rO~J~~~Vg O w y°~ r r ~ r r W FZe~~ ~~ ~ ~ r J ~ L S r ~ i r~~ 3 ~ ~..{{m~ ~'~ ~ ~ .~..;~r~s~ ~~ ~~i~~e~kl~~s~ • •o x o~ m N M Y Yf J r e a Mr b ~~~ ~b~ ~J 1 ~~~~ . 'u i '• 1i j __. tcs.tl ~ tN1 LItlaCO 0.721 ~ ~ `. ~ ~ ` f -' ! -~ R 4111 •f] T ~~~j)~/)~{.- ti ' ~ ~ r~ ~ 3, \•b s' i S ~ p n~ y Ifni 7 y ~~// ~~ ~~ ~ Y S spa -~ ~ t R~~_j ..--' a•z•.i.N•xNi~tlll3a_(~a~~j`Q~Qb,k,~ ~ •' _ "• ,~~~ m : • :, to r"-ra)3.yI,y4,siN 3,•.~ a ~,;~, o W rrrrr yy~~ ,{p ry.,~ J r B f. L~ '. Rai ' i ~~ .~ :' e.1 I ii F' `habt1'_.~m ~~'1-'~t~-"-!` rc ~ ~I'R~".itf~~t._ 'r _ p ~r ~ N ',^,i O Z- a ~N I ° ~`~-ice ~::xZ n ~... ~RR ,~~~ ~ I ~- §8$~'saat 3~~~~777 's s ,'; ~;. ~. ~ N'N ft,y K a ~ ;~ ~wwn~,wR? ,co•a S ~~ I y ~ ~ '4ua~~y{ s. y ( ~ =1k y1 I ~j F-. (~ ~=5iA1(f • ~ ~` " ~ a R ~~ ra r 3 w~ U t~?"3~= r sN ~ - I r' .. _ .. -d l~~~Ifw L. THEE REMOVAL PERMIT 92-1{ - HONLLL - Appeal of the City Plsnur'• deeLian denying a requpt to ramow two Eucalyptus tnu located on the north side of North victoria Nlndrows Loop, west of Aock Roae Avenue - APN: 227-all-61. Seott Murphy, Auociats Plainer, pnonted the staff report. Coamiuioner u1eMr obuzved Chat LM co®LUion had received word from Jeff Barnes, Parlu/Landscape Malntsnann 8upervSSOr, that tM trees an located in tM CiLy'• Landscape Maintmnance Distriet and although thane nod been a miundentandinq in LM past and the Lrses had not been suintainsd, they mould M smintained in tM future. Chairman McNiel incited public caaa+ant. Roxanne Howll, 6595 6ldmrbarry court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated tMt sM felt tM trees pose • airs danger, but she realised tMt tMre an confllctinq opinions regardlnq that danger. eM old LMt the arses you • urioua cUan- up wu for Mr. eM marked that Mr back yard is liken up almost completely by • pool and tM trees continually rain leaves Lnto nsr pool. she tsarad Chat tM trees are lowering Mr property value Mcauo eM did not think anyone mould Duy Mr noun Mewu of she conmtant moss Ln tM pool. aAe noted tMt tM iKter denying Mr Crme CMOVal pmsmit application stated that i! tM Lremm are properly maintained, tM fin danger le minimal and then mould M a rsduMion Sn tM leaves Ming dropped Into she pool. SAe oDUrvsd that tM trees nod Dun planted in 1985 and Mw never been uintalnsd. Shin etatW mM nod called [M City pveral times over the yeas and had been Cold it is the wrong fir of yur or it L not in the Clty'• budget. eM uid eM Md asked to M able to pay for trimming of tM trees and wain told aM could not do w. IIM ma10 one had not bun swans of how nigh tM true grow, and sM now wanted thmm resoved. SM stated aM was willing to replace thY wits any otner typo of trees and auggeased chat liquid ambers M uaad Mcauam tMy an tM street tree along the adjolnlnq atrue. She eked that aM M pewilimd to awintaln Mr property Ln inn enjoyable wy. There more no Lurthar public coarnte. CamluloMr Valletta mtatmd mM had formerly rdead eodemrna about 6ucalyptua tzua in tM planawd ca~unltUm and Md takmn a tour of tM City wits Sandaeapm mainUnann petsonnel about mlgnt anntM ago. 8hs oburvsd toot Mr. earns sad written • maaoranduw stating tM trees should haven bman maintained Dy tM city sad Nuld M maintained in eM futon. Sne said mM had seen • big impmvawnt In maintenann slow Mr. 8aznee took over. 8M lucad it mould ut • yrscmdent Lt tM haamorner wen allowed to rmplaee tM trees. She also remarked thmt Mcauu o[ tM winds, the traem could only M replaced clan otMr dmciduoue tress, wAien mould mull lose tMlr Uavem. Commiesloaer MeleMr ebmmtved that !os awry homeowner who appllem for pmrmlt to remove a LiN, tMn mien other nmident• wM mmtely remove tM tremor. Mm did net lmml that strmmt trmm maamrnea work wry wmll. Hm hopmd Planning Co~immion Minutmm -5- 9epCeMmr 9, 1992 172 4 that Mr. BarNa mould have the trNa Lriaaasd as soon ae pouible end sN what could M done to rectify eaN of the problems. Xe expressW sympathy for the applicant but felt u a Plaminq CommissioNZ he could not support the removQ Of tM trNS. Chairman NeNisl co®ented that when the Victoria Community Plan was Mtnq developW, the residents demandW that trNa be planted and raplacW. Xe agreed that the applicant hu • problem, but he talt the Commission needs to support tM strict trN policy. Be recommended that tM applicant appeal to city Council. In reaponN to Ca®iasioner lM1cMr, Dan JaNS, Banior Civil Engineer, sGtad that M had spoon with Mr. Barnaa and been advLed tMy mould M able to start trN trianing in tM arN in January. Chairman NcNlel zequutW that a Nnw of priority M given to Mvinq LM trNS tr1mW a soon N poulble, Mfote tM windy sgson. Ne again invited puDlie cement. Ns. 8owe11 stated aM apprsclatW iM CossLsioners' syaryathy. BM resarkW chat eucalyptus trNS shW Mrk and lNws all year long, not just in tM loll. 9M Nid sM planned to appeal to City Council and ohs hoped they mould consider her pool and grant an exception. It wu CM consensus of all thrN ComLdoners that tM appeal M dental. . • • . no public costars at this tine. • • • . . p. Brad Bu1Lr~ City Planners N Lhat h/ fe1L Lhe proposed wrdlnq had raieW larger policy quution aDOUt ieh M would IiM direction tram tM lull Cosolselon. B• Nked for qui on the appropriateneu of requNtinq changes when tfaa extemions ere reque Wand Lhsre new not been any cMngN to codN or standards. Camsiaaioner 1N1eMr slatW riot M under tM orlginel rNwn for requeKinq additional wrdlnq wu to M aura th project proponents tNllae they nay M contronLW with changes and Ae had su stW lanquags to convey that posalbllity ante clearly. Comissionsr gallette M11evW tM issue MO come up In neetion wlih reviewing a tit extension for • particular projsrt which tM 1Nlonen planning Conmluion Ninutes -4- Beptembes 9, 1992 173 CrrY VN' tCANCHU UUCAMUNUA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND STREAMLINE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES Attached for the City Council's review is the listing of City Council Committees, Subcommit[ces, and Commissions as designated from the November 30, 1992 City Council meeting. Respectfull Submitted, Diane O'Neal Management Analyst II Attachment: List of City Cvuncil Committees, Subcommittees, and Commissions 174 The folbwing is a brief synopsis of tech of the Council Commitmes, Subcommitmes and Commissions. BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALTTION (CLOUT) Provides a program of action for dre public and privam sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area-wide impotsance. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE.: Williams CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE The City Selection Committee is made up of all of the Mayas for San Bernardino County and its purpose is m select elecmd reprexrtmtives m various bodies which brclttde: I.aral Agency Formation Commission (I.AFCO) and the An Quality Management DisvicL The regular meeting of the cpnmitme is heW on the last wodcur6 day of April of every even numbertd year. Mtyor is ReprweoWtivt AB 9]9 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE This is a stem matMamd task face created by San Bernardino County and is made up of the Board of Supervisors, elected representa[ivns fran each Ciry within San Bernardino end IOhon-elected represrnmtives. The purposc of the task force k m coadimm the development of the County and City's Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and m coordvum a cos[ effective tegiaml solid wasm m~nagemeIX system. Meets on a Quarterly Basis, the Third Thursday o/ Each Mooth from 2 p.m. l0 0 p.m. io Sao Beraardioo. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Wiiliama AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE Provides liaison with the South Coati Art Quality Management District regarding av quality issues. 1lireta as Needed DELEGATE: Stout ALTERNATE: Gutkrrex ANIMAL CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the building of the Animal Control Facility end monimrs mumW imms of interca4 Meets as Needed DELF,CATES: Stool sad Buquet 175 CABLE TELEVISION/PUBLIC ACCESS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for We cable television franchises and m develop the public access portion of the franchise BglCettlplL Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Bugnel nod Gutierrez CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION The Association provides a networking wiN othu connect cites for services, such as working on legislation, and is currendy working on a more equitable dvs:ributian of properly mx (espetiaBy to bw/no ptoputy tax cities). Mccts as Needed DELEGATE; Alexander ALTERNATE: Stout CENTRAL PARK DESIGN COMMITTEE Provides liaison for the development of the City's Cenual Park aM will serve a9 City Council liaison for library issues. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Stout and Williams ALTERNATE: Gutierrez CHAMBER OP COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE Provides liaison between the Chamber of Commerce and die City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating projects aM items of mutual interest Meets Secoed Wednesday o/ Each Moot4 DELEGATE: Williams ALTERNATE: Akxaoder COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTR6 Monitors Ute activities of the Foundation and items of mutual inkrcst Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Alexaoder aed Williams DAY LABORER TASK FORCE Provides liaison m the Day labor issues. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Akxauder and Gutierrez 116 DEVELOPMENT AND INSPECTION REVIEW AD HOC COMMITTEE (ARROYO SEGO STUDY) Asslsrs with developing plan review, pemtit iaettance and inspection services encompassing both the City and Fire District. MeeLS u Needed DELEGATES: Buquet and Akxaoder EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison with the Emergency Preparedness Depanmen[ in the coadinadon of its projects and disaster Peparedness Dlanning. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Williams aed Gutierrez FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison with dte Finmtce Department. Meets as NtedM DELEGATES: BaquN and Williams FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Reviews employment eligibility Gals prior to certification and Aber related personnel masers. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Stout pod Akxaoder HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE Revews affaNebk housing ttaeds and develops strmegy end pogroms feragerey sa-aside mmiey. MeeU as Nettled DELEGATES: Akxaader and Gutierrzz INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OP CALIFORNIA CITIES The Inland Empire League is one of fifteen divisions within the League of California Cities and functions as an "ertn" of cities. The League also povides uaining, kgisktive trnclting, and research [or assaciak tides. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Stout 11! LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison fa law eMorcement issues including coordiriotrm d the Anti~Grdffiti Task Force. Mnu as Needed DELEGATES: Stoat and BagaN MOBILE HOME ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison fa the Ciry's Mdfile home Accord and Contract negotivions. The Accord is a contract between the owners of the City's mobile harre {arks and Ute Ciry and addresses rent stabilization fa the mobile home parks. Meeu as Needed DELEGATES: Williams nod Gutierrez ALTERNATE: Aiexaoder OMNITRANS OhDJITRANS is a loin[ Powers Agreement whkh coordinaka the basing needs of iu assaiate tides. These meetings ore held the f'usl Wednesday of each month m San Bemadtrq and begin m 5:00 am. DELEGATE: Bngoet ALTERNATE: Aknader PARK AND RECREATION PACILI7IES SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison fa the consauction of park and recreation faBitrrs and items of mutual corcan. Meeu as Needed DELEGATES: Stoat and Williams PUBL[.^^. WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE Providrs liaison fa public wake poJects Ntrwghout the City. Meeu as NeMtd DELEGATES: Bagaet and Williams REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison fa the maAedng of die Ciry end reviews agency marketing budge4 Meeu a6 Needed DELEGATES: Smut nod Willlema 170 REGIONAL MALL SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the corutruction of the Regional Mall. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Stout Heil Buquet SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY GANGS & ORUC TASK FORCE Interfaces with other bcel agencies and districts m address gang and drug issues throughom our region. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Williams sad Gutierrez SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOIL EROSION SUBCOMMITTEE This is a San Bemardita County Subcommittee established [a the Soil Ermian District The City participates on this Subcommittee and pmvides liaison for the soil cadidans within the City and also monitors the pn;vrntlon of soil erosion during high winds. Meets as Netded DELEGATE: Gutierrez ALTERNATE: Williams SANBAG SANBAG is the regional planning authority of which the City participates in Nrough a loins Powers Agrcement. These meetings are held the first Wednesday of cacA montlt in San Bernardino and begin at 9:00 a.m. DELEGATE: Ruquet ALTERNATE: Alexander SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAC) SCAG B an association of County and City governments end is a Council of uavemmants (COG). The purpose of such councils is m provide a tomm while members can reach agreement on issues of common concern and develop regional planning approaches. Meets as Needed DELEGATE: Stout ALTERNATE: Williams SPHERE OF tNPLUENCE SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for those issues effecting the City's sphere of influence. Meets n Needed DELEGATES: Stout soil Buquet 179 YOUTH ASSISTANCE SUBCOMMTTTEE Addresses Ponding oppa0mines fa pmpoaed canprehensive Youdl assiatartce progams (a at-risk Youdts and thew families. Meets u Needed pELECATES: Akxaoder alsd Gutierrez VICTORIA LAKES SUBCOMMITTEE Liaison for design plans, lakes, artd mainkimitoe costs fa die pmjeee Mttt9 u Needed DELEGATES: Bugaet sad Williams ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION The Council Subcommittees far dteae Commissions conduct the interviews for tin: exp'ued krms and vacancies a9 dtey occur and pmvide Raison for inure of mtmW internal. EMC DELEGATES: Scoot sad Wllliama HPC DELEGATES: Akxnder and Gatierre: Park & Rrcreatioo DELEGATES: BogoN and WilBama Plaooieg DELEGATES: Stott and Buquel Publlc So(ety DF.LETiONS AS DIRF.C DELEGATES: TRD BY TNF. CIT Akxaodar and Gotierrea Y COIINCII. City Entry Monument Subcommittee League of Califanie Cities Voting Repmserttarive (WBI h egendizcd as appropriate) Library Services Creanan Tatk Face NortBc Waads Subwmmittee Rtereational Vehkk Subcammitke Regiotal Av Quality Element Subcanmiftee 1® COUNCB, COMMfiTEES/SUBCOMMITTEESRND COMMISSIONS Stout Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Animal Control Subcommittee Central Park Design Committee City Selection Committer Environmental Management Commission Subcommittce Fue District Personnel Committee Law Enforcement Subcommiltce Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Planning Carunission Suhcanmitrce Redevelopment Madceting Subcammitter Regional Mall Subcornnritter Southern California Associated Govenmtents (SLAG) Sphene of Influence Subcommittee California Contract Cities Associadon Wand Empire League of California Cities B1CEa~ A6939 Solid Waste Task Force Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUD California Contract Cities Association Community Foundation Subcornmitter Day Laborer Task Force Development and Inspection Review Ad Hoc Comm (Arroyo Seco) Fue District Personnel Conurdaee Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee Housing Set Aside Subcomntittce Wand Ertrpire League of California Cities Public Safety Commission Subcommittee Youth Assistance Subcormrritter Chamber of Commerce Representative Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittce Omnittans SANBAG DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Altercate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Altercate Altemax Altercate Altercate 181 viii yr rcesiv~;nv i,u ~:~unuivtin After completion of the staff report, staff received the attached letter from Mr. Austin's attorney (CAarles A. Doskow) lnfoneing us that the property has changed hands. It has been deeded to Crosby Insurance Profit SAaring and Pension Plan, Helmut Dueck, Trustee, who wish to pursue the appeal. The staff report is attached. NJO:BRN:dIw Attachment MEMORANDUM DATE: Jane 2 1993 t T0: Mayor and Mea~ers of the CTty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer~ _~~ BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Sr. Civil En~,(~er SUBJECT: RE UEST TO DELETE STREET RE UIREMENTS FOR 10306 DALO ALTO STREET STREET EAST OF CENTER AVENUE :Y' •~ Chozles S. Doskow A LAW COgPOPATION Nay 26, 1993 RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK The Nayor and Members of the City Council c1Tx of RANCHO CUCANONGA MpY 2 61993 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 789t0i1111212131as161 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 Re: 10306 Palo Alto, Rancho Cucamogna Appeal of Mark Austin/Helmut Deuck, Trustee City Council Agenda: June 2, 1993 we attach hereto the appeal originally filed in this matter, with supporting documentation. since the Piling oP this appeal the property in issue has bean deeded to Crosby Insurance Profit Sharing and Pension Plan, Helmut Dueck, Trustee. This appeal, is being pursued on its behalf, as the owner of the property. The actions of the City in this matter have effectively crippled Mr. Austin's financial capabilities. Ne seek only to have the City act in accordance with law. Very truly Aovurs,/J ~j/ < Charle Doakow CBD:dec 222 Noah Mountain Avenue. Sulie 210. Uplond, Calllomla 91786 909.94b1991 FAX 909-946.6684 109 Charles S. Doskow F lF'!J CC?.FOBATI G:: April 12, 1993 The Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 Re: 10306 Palo Alto, Rancho Cucamogna Appeal of Mark Austin city Council Agenda: April 21 Mark Austin appeals the determination by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga set forth in its letter of February 2d, 1993. A copy oP that letter and Mr. Austin's Notice of Appeal are enclosed. This office represents Mr. Austin in his appeal. The City is attempting to require Mr. A•lstin to dedicate, without compensation of any kind, twenty-four per cent of the area of the lot on which he has constructed a single family residence for speculative sale. Street improvements are also demanded on the land demanded. Staff has attempted to enforce this requirement by denying inspections to Mr. Austin for a significant period of time. Staff has also attempted to threaten or cajole Mr. Austin into agreement with the imposition of the requirements set forth in the February 24 letter from which this appeal is taken. Staff has indicated that no final inspection will occur, nor certificate of occupancy issue, unless its demands are met. Amendment V to the Constitution oP the United States, made applicable to the states by Amendment XIV, provides "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." The Constitution of the State of California Contains the Same requirement. Code of Civil Procedure $ 1263.310 mandates compensation Por property taken. Mr. Austin sited the house on the lot in reliance on tha building permit which was issued to him. The house has been constructed in reliance on the building permit. 222 Nosh Mountc:n Avenue. Swte 210. Upland. C¢Illomle 91786 909.940.1991 ~ FAY 909.946-6084 10`t The Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 12, 1993 Page 2 There is no objection to condemnation of the land by the City with just compensation. we request that the Council instruct city staff to (1) perform all requested inspections of the subject property promptly upon proper request, (2) issue a certificate of occupancy upon completion of construction) and (3) do nothing to attempt to enforce the demands made in the February 2a letter. in the alternative, we request that the City institute condemnation without delay. The actions of staff have had a serious negative impact on Mr. Austin's financial position. Ha asks only that' he be treated fairly, and in accordance with law. Very truly yours, ~~ Charles S. Doskow Attorney for Mark Austin CSD:dsc 185 1 H E '~ ~'~~ N C lj J February 24, ISP3 C U L ~, O F ~1 O N G RECEIVED ~,' ~ - 1 LS3 Mark Austin Austin Constructors 23572 Canttnenta7 Drive Canyon Lzke, CA 92587 RE: Single Family Residence at 10306 Palo A.1 to Street Oear Mr. Austin: This letter is to reafixm the City Engineering Di vision's position structure tat ltheszbovessnoted addressou tThoseeiltems,upwhich fwere previously stated in letters dated Nay 9, 1990 and Narch 17, 1992, are as folloxs: 1. A 25 foot wide offer of dedication for Ivy Lane. P.. A offer of dedication for a corner cut off at the Ivy Lane/Pa1o Alto intersection. 3. A lien agreement fcr the future construction of the Ivy,lane street Improvements including the curb return at Palo Alto. 4. The completion of the street improvements on Paio Alto Street. It is noted that the Ivy Lane right-of-way width requirement has keen reduced from the prevtously required 30 feet, which is the City Standard, to 25 feet, which Ts considered the minimum acceptable to provide the necessary street improvements. Al so, item 2 was not mentioned prevtously, because 1t is a minor item that would have been asked for during the review of the offer of dedication documents. Your oppeslticn in the ivy Lana ofeer dedication and future improvements Ts ackncwledged, however, it 1's felt that the eventual construction of Ivy Lane thru to Palo Alto Street is necessary to provide proper circulation far the general area, and allow for the potential futher subdivision cf the currently underdeveloped properties 1n the area. !+'e zre 1n receipt of a letter signed by several of the residents to the north expressing their desire to see Ivy Lane extended thru to Palo Alta. ~1 IJCyor Cennis 1. Sl cu7 ceurcrvmember Wiliiom J. Ale xonCer M aypi nio~iem Cnodes J, auouel it Ccunalnembei Dipne N'illiom, Jcc« Lom. AiC P, CAy tJ~enecEi ~ Ccunaimembei nex Gul'~euet IOSOn Grit Cernei GVrve VO ac+?^i ec nc nc Cuco mr., a C:. ci~.v o ~7 l0'%):5P:FSi ::.x iav; :r; p. Imo., 1° Austin constructors v February'24, 2993 Page 2 We are, a1 so, in receipt of a letter from the Assistant Principal of the Oona Merced Elementary School in opposition to the extension of ivy Lane to Palo Auto. We aDPreciate his concerns, but feel the connection can be made 1n a safe manner. .If you would tfke to appeal staff's decision on the requirements to the ;City.~COUnc11; you may do so by submitting a letter explaining your ~~ ~~''~au=poSitidm and the payment of a (251.00 appeal fee. If ycu should have any questions, feel free to contact the undersigned or' Willie Yalbuena at (909) 989-1862 extensions 2311 or 2364, respectively. Sincereiy, . COKMl1NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAATMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Barrye A. Hanson , Senior C1vi1 Engineer ,~ cc: Raiph Hanson .David Yan Fleet, Dona M,e rc ed Elementary School Rick Gomez, Community Development W1717am ~. O'Neil, City Engineer Shtntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer i 187 Vfll VP RH_1~1 VS1V ~/V liHlvl'J1YVA STAFF REPORT ., DATE: June 2, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager , FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Sr. CTVtI Engineer SUBJECT: RE UEST TO DELETE STREET RE UIREMENTS FOR 10306 PALO ALTO STREET STREET EAST OF CENTER AVENUE RECONlENOATIOM It is re.:ommended that the City Council deny the applicant's request. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In January 1989 Mr. Mark Austin submitted plans to construct a single family residence at 10306 Palo Alto Street. Plans were reviewed by City staff, appropriate conditions applteA to the protect and a bull ding permit Wes issued on January 11, 1990. Subsequent to issuance of the building permit, Engineering staff became aware of an oversight regarding dedication for street improvements. In reviewing Mr. Austin's plan, staff required dedication and street improvements on Palo Alto Street but failed to require an offer of Aedication for Ivy Lane, a future north/south street located east of Center Avenue north of Palo Alto Street (refer to location map, Exhibit "A"). Mr. Austin has refused the requirement to offer for dedication the needeA right-of-way for Ivy Lane (refer to Appeal Letters Exhibits "8" and "C"). Mr. Austin has dedicated the right-of-way for Palo Alto Street, but has yet to agree to construct the necessary Improvements on Palo Alto adJacent to his property. Nhile an offer of dedication for future Ivy Lane has been required, please note no im rovements have been required at this time. Improvements are to be deferr un a u ure time when other improvements 1n the area are undertaken. The improvements ad,~acent to his property on future Ivy Lane will be secured by a Lien Agreement. In researching this situation, staff has founA an easement al read exists over the easterly 15 feet of Mr. Austin's property, in favor o parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown on the location map (Exhibit "A"). The dedication of 25-foot street right-of-wdy would therefore only result 1n a net loss of an additional 10 feet or 10% of the entire lot to Mr. Austin. 1~ CITY COUNCIL S'IAFF REPORT 10306 PALO ALTO ST - MR MAAK AUSTIN June 2, 1993 Page 2 Staff has been working with Mr. Austin to resolve this request. We have allowed him to continue to construct the home insplte of the fact he has not agreed to dedicate the necessary right-of-way on Ivy lane nor begun construction of improvements on Palo Alto (see attached letter Exhibit "D"). We have however indicated to Mr. Austin a final release will not he given until the issue of right-of-way on Ivy Lane has been resolved. Staff has outlined in a letter dateA February 24, 1993 (Exhibit "E") the four conditions that are necessary and to allow the Engineering Division to agree to a final sign off. The conditions as applied to Mr. Austin are consistent with conditions far ail other similar projects in the City. The Municipal Code requires dedication and improvements for all public rights-of-way prior to issuance of a building permit for a new structure. The City Attorney has reviewed this situation anA has determined the conditions are legal anA consistent with all C7ty Ordinances. The issue of ingress and egress in this area is of great concern to surrounding residents. The City has received a letter (Exhibit "F") from residents to the north expressing their desire to see the Ivy Lane right-ot- way dedicated to the City. Apparently, at one time this access was open and allowed for ingress/egress of both vehicles and particularly school children, but in the recent past has been closed. We have also received letters from the Central School District and the Assistant Principal of Dona Merced Elementary School, located south of Palo Alto Street (Exhibits "G", "N", and "l'). Ne have spoken with school officials and explained the issue at hand is not construction of Ivy Lane but only an offer of dedication. The school bas been assured in wri ting that construction Is a future issue at which time their input will be evaluated (copy attached Exhibit "J"). The Public Works Subcommittee has reviewed this issue and supports the staffs' recommendation. Therefore, based on the Municipal Code which requires dedication for the project, the request of the residents 1n the area, the already existing 15 foot easement on the Austin property and recognizing the Aevel Oper is not being required at this time to construct any improvements, staff recommends the City Council reaff7rm the requirement for an offer of dedication of rlght- of-way on future Ivy Lane and other requirements as outlined 1n staff's letter dated February 24, 1993. Respectfull,'j~fitted, ' C/~~ ~~ Cl-(: C William J.CQ~NA11 City Engineer WJO:BRH:sd Attachments 1~ CIiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK h1AR 2 41993 h~319i~oi~;i;zi;izivieisia 2dAR1C AUSTIN AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 23572 Continental Drive Canyon Laka CA 92587 NOTICE OF APPEAL The undersigned hereby appeals to tha City Council the determination by members of the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as set forth in the attached letter dated February 24, 1993. This appeal is based upon the following facts: 1. The city has issued me a building permit to construct a single family house at 10306 Palo Alto. 2. After the plan for the site was developed, and while the house was under construction, the City demanded that I dedicate land to the City for street purposes without compensation, and refused for a period of time to authorize inspections unless such dedication be made. 3. The structure is located on the lot in reliance on the initial issuance of permit, in such a marnc.- that dsdicaticn as requested by the City would greatly diminish the attractiveness and value of the property. The quantity of land demanded is twenty-three per cent of the lot area. 4. I believe, based on conversations and the positions that have been taken in the past, that City staff will decline to allow utility hookups or issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless the demanded dedication is made. The house is near completion. 5. The City is attempting to take my property without just compensation therefor, in violation of the constitutions of the United States and the State of California. I would nat resist condemnation if adequate compensation were offered. Respectfu y submitted, r ////// ~usti Enclosure: Fee for appeal 5251.00 1~ , R ~' ~ F I l/ ... ~' cc: ~dcK ~M .~6'il~ r r nc u.xrxr ~ Chcales S. Doskow ENGINEERING DIVI$IC.'+ ALAW COgPC iATION EXH/B/T 'B a April 12, 1993 CITY OF ggMCHO CUCAA1pNGA The Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 civic center Drive APR 121993 Post Office Box B07 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 I'll 2 i 9I le' SI i Ili 1 - -~-i~_'3'~4~S i6~ Re: 10306 Palo Alto, Rancho CucaIDOgna Appeal of Mark Austin City Council Agenda: Apr11 21 Mark Austin appeals the determination by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga set forth in its letter of February 24, 1993. A copy of that letter and Mr. Austin's Notice of Appeal are enclosed. This office represents Mr. Austin in hie appeal. The City is attempting to require Mr. Austin to dedicate, without compensation of any kind, twenty-four per cent of the area of the lot on which he has constructed a single family residence for speculative sale. Street improvements are also demanded on the land demanded. Staff has attempted to enforce this requirement by denying inspections to Mr. Austin for a significant period of time. Staff has also attempted to threaten or cajole Mr. Austin into agreemen[ with the imposition of the requirements sat forth in the February 24 letter Prom which this appeal is taken. Staft has Indicated that no final inspection will occur, nor certificate of occupancy issue, unless its demands are met. Amendment V to the Constitution of the United States, made applicable to the states by Amendment XIV, provides "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." The Constitution of the Stets of California contains the same requirement. Code of Civil Procedure S 1263.310 mandates compensation for property taken. Mr. Austin sited the house on the lot in reliance on the building permit which was issued to him. Tha house has been constructed in reliance on the building permit. 222 Nonn Mountain Avenue, State 210. Upland, Camomla 917Ae oov-v4o-lool I FAx cov-o4e.xe41~ Exhibit "B" The Mayor and Members o£ the City Council CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMOMGA April 12, 1993 Pages 2 There is no objection to condemnation of the land by the City with just compensation. we request that the Council instruct city atafP to (1) perform all requested inspections of the subject property promptly upon proper request; (2) issue a certificate of occupancy upon completion of construction; and (3) do nothing to attempt to enforce the demands made in the Februsry 24 latter. In the alternative, we request that the city inatitusa condemnation without delay. The actions o£ staff have had a serious negative impact on Mr. Austin's Financial position. He oaks only that ha ba trseted fairly, and in accordance with laa. Vary truly yours, ~~ Charles 8. Doakow Attorney for Mark Auatln CSD:deC lea EXH/B/TC'~~ CITY OF R RECEIVED ANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK MAR 2 41993 ~7~89101 I(II 11231415161 MARK AUSTIN AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 23572 Continental Drive Canyon Lake CA 92587 NOTICE OP APPEAL The undersigned hereby appeals to the City Council the determination by members of the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as set forth in the attached latter dated February 24, 1993. This appeal is based upon the following facts: i. The City has issued me a building permit to construct a single family house at 10306 Palo Alto. 2. After the plan for the site was developed, and while the house was under construction, the City demanded that I dedicate land to the City for street purposes without compensation, and refused for a period of time to authorize inspections unless such dedication be made. 3. The structure is located on the lot in reliance on the initial issuance of permit, in aunt: a mannnr that dedication as requested by the City would greatly diminish the attractiveness and value of the property. The quantity of land demanded is twenty-three per cent of the lot area. 4. I believe, based on conversations and the positions that have been taken in tha•past, that City staff will decline to allow utility hookups or issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless the demanded d@dication is made. The house is near completion. 5. The City is attempting to take my property without just compensation therefor, in violation of the constitutions of the United States and the State of California, i would not resist condemnation 1f adequate compensation were offered. Respectfu y ssA`Ju 1bmwit~t^,ne/~d,~/ 1 V~ Mark Auati Enclosure: Fee for appeal $251.00 Exhibit "C" r F~ ~ n ~ c O 'r E March 17, 1992 1 C V C [~ ill ~ t ~ !~ EXH/B/T 0" Mark Austin Austin Construction 23572 Continental Drive ' Canyon Lake, CA 92587 Dear Mr. P.ustin: During our meeting on March 30, 1992, we discussed your project on Palo Alto Street in Rancho Cucamonga and steps that could be taken to get construction restarted. At this time we are Drepared to authorize continued construction on the property with the understanding the issues of dedication on Ivy Lane, a lien for future street improvements on Ivy Lane and construction of public improvements on Palo Alto must be resolved before issuance of an occupancy permit and/or authorization of utility turn on. Please contact me at your earliest convenience and adivse if this proposal is acceptable to you. If you have questions Dlease contact wither myself or Mr. Oan James. Yery truly yours, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVI~SIONn ~~ V / ~~ William C'Neil City Engineer WJO: dIw cc: Rick Gomez, Corsnunity Development Director Jerry Grant, Building Official Oan James, Senior Civil Engineecr n,"oyor Denros l Stour F~ _ "P Counc~lmember Diane Wilhgms Mrv/qr Pro- rem W.uigm 1 A~eKCnCer ,~~~ ~' ~ Counctlmember ngmeiq J N/ng nr ..c'k lam r1:CP. GN Mgnuger Coungilmernber G~~orles J Ouquet II ~~ ..5~0 :,. •, •>:~.!nr .. PO BCx tl01 a^c no Cucor,crgc G4 a1 •;~ ~.•f :+.>t951 ::.,r ri ~.:'~:gith(:1:~ Exhibit "u;siJ T H E R t1 N C K February 24, 19a3 C v O F O C UC ~~ MONG L~ EXH/B/T ~E'` Mark Austin Austin Constructors 23572 Continental Drive Canyon lake, CA 92587 RE: Single Family Residence at 10306 Palo Alto Street Dear Mr. Austin: TMs Letter is to reaflrm the Ctty Engineering Division's position regarding the items necessary to ail ow you to receive occupancy of the structure at the above noted address. Those Items, which were previously stated in letters dated May 9, 1990 and March 17, 1992, are as follows: 1. A 25 foot wide offer of dedication for Ivy Lane. 2. A offer of dedication for a corner cut off at ,the Ivy lane/Palo Alto intersection. 3. A Lien agreement for the future construction of the Ivy Lane street Improvements /nciuding the curb return at Pala Alto. 4. The completion of the street improvements on Palo Alto Street. (t is noted that the Ivy Lane right-of-wqy width requtremenr, has been reduced from the previously required 30 feet, which 1s the City Standard, tb 25 feet, which is considereA the minimum acceptable to provide the necessary street improvements. Also, item 2 was not mentioned previously, because 1t is a minor item that would have been asked for during the review of the offer of de4lcatton documents. Your opposition to the Ivy Lane offer of dedication and future improvements is acknowledged. However, tt is felt that the eventual construction of Ivy Lane thru to Palo Alto Street is necessary to provide proper circulation for the general area, and allow for the potential father subdivision of the currently unAerdeveloped properties in the area. 4'e are in receipt of a letter signed by several of the residents to the north expressing their desire to see Ivy Lane extended thru to Palo Alto. M OVOI CennrS l Stout ~ COUnCllmembef W11bgm J. Ale.a nCer M ovor Pra~lem Cnorles J Buquet II +r-~ Councnmember D1gne wdlloms Jack Lam AICP CAy Mqnoqer Councllmember Rea Guhenez I^,_'til C vc Cerve~ Uwe ~ v 0 Sox B01 Roncno CacnmanGp r:A 91119 (Poo) 9BG.1d51 •.. Exhibit "E" 1"c Austin Constructors February 24, 2993 Page 2 We are, also, in receipt of a letter from the Assistant Principal of the Dona Merced Elementary School 1n opposition to the extension of Ivy lane to Palo At to. We appreciate his concerns, but feel the connettton can be made Tn a safe manner. tf you would tike to appeal staff's decision on the requirements to the City Council, you may do so by submitting a letter exptalning your position and the payment of a 5251.00 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, feet free to contact the undersigned or Niilie Yalbuena at (909) 989-1862 extensions 2311 or 2364, respectively. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT E/N~GINEERING DEPARTMENT ~.% ~/ Rarrye R. Hanson Senior C1v11 Engineer cc: Ralph Hanson David Van Fleet, Oona Merced Elementary School R1ck Gamez, Comnunlty Development W1111am J. O'Ne11, City Engineer Shtntu Bose, Deputy C1ty Engineer 1~ EXH/B/T iF" Date: 9 June ig92 Tm: City Engineer of Rancho Cucamonga From: Residents of Ivy Court 6 Ivy Lane Subject: Ivy Lane Road Easement RFc F ci ANN 'V~. F °` 1j ~99~ O ~ccyom;~~~a, Dur neighborhood has been in{ormed that there will be a decision made as to whether or not an easement, connecting Ivy Lane to Palo glto will 6e allowed .We represent a majority of the impactetl community antl we are not only extremely disappointed with the present access closure of Ivy Lane, but are alarmed to be informed that this situation may become permanent. We hope that the superficial wishes of a select few will not overshadow the genuine concerns of the majority of the community. Dur concerns are plain antl simples we want safe access to the other side of our community. In the past, we were able to drive through this area and our children also used this route as an access way to school. It didn't matter that it was only a dirt roatl~ what matters was we had a safe alternate access to our surrounding community. Now that the area has been hl ocked off, our children must now walk a far more lengthy and dangerous route to school. Morecver~ simple vehicle access to the area has keen sincerely missetl. We have had to suffer enough, ql ready we must accept the fact that Ivy Lane may never 6e fully completetl. Consequently, we must make due with only a dead-end half built road which can 6e very dangerous to both pedestrians and vehicl as. Wa have had enough of this seeming lack of concern for our community. It is time the city acknowl edgad this absurd situation and ensure suture access of eur community by coot inuin9 the existing easement on Ivy Lane all the way through to Palo glto. Sincerely ~~ ~~~ ~~~~,~- ~~~~.- ~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ Exhibit "F" 1.70 Li h- /i 17 ADMINISTRATION Central School District Sonja L. Yates, Ed.D, 5~a°°r°°d°°r Ingrid Vogel 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 /Rancho Cucamonga, California 91 730 / p14) 969-6541 Asasram supenmendenr xvs~nett Sen¢es Sharon 1. Nagel RECEIVED CITY OF RAryCHO CUCAM Ass~sranr SUcer~~rendenr Educx~onal Servrcn ONGA PLANNING DIVISION APR 141993 April 12, 1993 ~ 6 ~~~~a>~14151 Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Letter in opposition to the Extension of Ivy Lane to Palo Alto Street Dear Mr. culler: Central School District is requesting that tha decision to extend Ivy Lane to Palo Alto Street is again reviewed and reconsidered by the City with the safety of Dona Merced Elementary School students in mind. I fully concur with the concerns raised by Mr. Van Fleet in his March 9, 1993 letter addressed to Mr. Hanson and strongly believe the seriousness of the problem needs to be addressed again before a final decision is made. If there is anything else the school district can do to clarify the situation, please let me know. sincerely, ~(~~ u v~ Irgr d Vogel Assistant Superintendent, Business Services C: Jack Lam, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer B. Dalton, Principal, Dona Merced School D. Van Fleet, Assistant Principal, Dona Merced School Attachments BOARD Oi TRUSTEFS Debra K Bann Diane L Gamer Richard A Mover Dobm E. RwWI Inan R. Weirs Exhibit "G" l~ Dora Merced Elementary School 'A school where every child counts" March 9, 1993 Barrye R. Ranson, Senior Civil Engineer Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 EXH/B/T H N RE: F.x tension of Ivy Lane to Palo Alto Street Dear Mr. Ranson, I received a copy oY the letter dated 2/24/93 which you sent to Mark Austin regarding the single family residence at 10306 Palo Alto Street. In this letter, you made reference to a letter you received from me in opposition to the extension of Ivy Lane to Palo Alto. You stated you feel the connection can be made in a safe manner. However, at no place in your letter did you address the safety of the children attending Dona Merced Elementary School. Please refer my letter dated 1/29/92 diseusaing these concerns. We would welcome someone from the Engineering Department, the Safety Department, the Sheriff Department, and City Council to visit our school between 2:50 p.m. and 3:20 p.m. (or 1:35 p.m. and 2:05 p.m. on Wednesdays). These Limes are during dismissal for our students. Congestion is particularly evident on rainy days, when cars are parked on both sides oP Palo Alto, cars are waiting to turn into the school parking lot from both the east and west sides of Palo Alto, and the school buses are attempting to turn left out oY the bus loading area onto Palo Alto. The extension of Ivy Lane would only add to the confusion and congestion in front of Dona Merced Elementary School. Another concern is that at the present time there is only a sidewalk part way down the street on the east side of Ivy Lane from Baseline. If Ivy Lane becomes a through street, there would need to be sidewalks on both sides of the street from Baseline to Palo Alto. Our mnjor concern is for the safety of our children at Dona Merced Elementary School. Please feel free to call us at 980-1600 and speak to Robert Dalton, the Principal, be Pore you make a final decision on this matter. S' erp l/~, ~itud L'C1.~1 ~-~G. David Van Fleet, Assistant Principal 10333 PALO ALTO, RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 980-16i0W0 1 Exhibit "n."W Dona Merced Elementary School "A school where every child counts" January 29, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. eor 807 Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Willie Vnlbuena, City Engineers Oftice Dear Mr. Velbuene, Thank you for calling me regarding the possibility of Ivy Lene becoming a through street trop Baseline to Palo Alto. I as writing this letter on behalf of Dona Merced School, asking that Ivy Lane not be changed to 'n through street for the following reaaona: 1. (:enter Street is located approxiaately 250 feet weal of Ivq Lane and is s through street trop Bsseline to Candlewood. This allows our parents edeQUata access for transporting their children by car. 2. Palo Alto in front of the school at Ivy Lane is only 27 feet wide. When car• ere Dsrked on both north sod xouth aides of Palo Alto in front ~t the school, it is difficult for our school buses to sake a left I:urn out aP the bus loading area. If Ivy Lane becone• n through xtreet, it will ante raecL Pelo Alto in the aid<Ile of our bus loading area, causing wore traffic congestion. 3. It Ivy Lane cones through to Pelo Alto, 'our parents nay use that intersection to drop ott or pick up students. :itudents would then be crossing Pelo Alto in a highly congealed ere• to get to the school grounds. 4. At the present tine, [here is no sidewalk on the north side of Pnlo Alto. It Ivy Lane becomes a through street, students would be walking in the street to get to their parents' cars parked on Ivy Lane. For all of these reaaona, we Yeel the safety oP our children would be enhanced by not extending Ivy Lane through to Pnlo Alto. We appreciate conslderntion o[ our cancerna. Sincerely, David Van Fleet, Aaalstnnt. Principal Dona Merced Elementary School Exhibit:vv~i" EXH/B/T 'I " T H E C ~ ~~ NC ISO May 10 1993 T Y O F C U C ~ MONG t1 EXH/B/T ,~!" Ingrid Vogel Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Central School District 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: INTERSECTION OF IVY LANE AND PALO ALTO STREET Dear Ms. Vogel: I have reviewed your letter of April 12, 1993 and the letter from David Van Fleet, Assistant Principal at Dona Merced Elementary School, dated January 29, 1992, regarding the extension of Ivy Lane to Palo Alto Street. The City appreciates your review and conments relative to the future extension and of Ivy Lane. Please let me put the issue in its proper perspective. The City will be considering a request by Mark Austin, a contractor developing a single family residence at 10306 Palo Alto Street. Mr. Austin has been conditioned by the City to provide a 25-foot wide offer of dedication for future Ivy Lane and certain street improvements on a o tl~T--A1 o-StreeC. This request is a standard City condition for development within the community and is consistent with requests for other similar developments. Currently there is a 15-foot wide private easement on the east side of the property for ingress/egress. Please note the City is not requiring the developer to construct ivy Lane at this time. Obviously, in reviewing the conditions in the field, it is clear there are numerous privately owned parcels involved in any potential extension of ivy Lane. The Developer has not been asked to install improvements on Ivy Lane nor does the City have any plans at this time, nor in the forseeable future for the completion of Ivy Lane. The issue of whether or not the street will ever be completed, depends on future land development within the area. The reason the City 1s requesting an offer of dedication at this time, is without such offer it would be difficult to complete the extension, if in the future it was deemed necessary. The issues you raise are certainly valid and warrant consideration. At such time as the issue to actually extend the street is considered, those issues will be fully discussed. Mayor Donnie L. Stout (;ouncilmember WA~lam J. Alexantler rolnvo~ Piaiem Char!os J. auquet II -~ ~ ~ Councdmember Duna Wllhams Jost ! om, AIC P, Clty Idanag^r Coun ;ilmertbP.r nex GUberrot I,^.°bOC.~0. C~~n •~p pnv~: ~ PO.fax 9ql Rnnc ho Caaomarq a. CA r~Vpn (oP~l %flvIF,51 FAX (9n'i~9y ]~GJ99 Exhibit "J" 2' I NGRID VOGEL INTERSCCTI ON CF IVY LANE AND PALO ALTO STREET May 10, 1993 Page 2 Also, the City is in receipt of a petition from residents in the neighborhood requesting Ivy Lane be extended to Palo Alto (copy attached). The concerns of the citizens are for access to not only Palo Alto but to Dona Merced School. Please note this issue will be considered by the City Council on June 5, 1993. If you have any questions rzgarding this matter please contact either myself or City Engineer Jioe~)O'Neil. Sincerely. / ty De,Lelopment Director cc: B. Dalton, Pri nclpal, Dona Merced School O .. ~ r MF)IDRAI~IIN OF UMDERSTARDIM6 lhis Memorandum of Understanding is entered into Dy and between the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Ff re fighters Association (herein after referred to as "Association") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Board (herein after re fa rred to as "Board"). Whereas, the Association and Board have met and conferred in good faith regarding Issues within the scope of meet and confer; and whereas, the Association and Board have reached agreement regarding issues within the scope of meet and roofer: and whereas, the Association and Board wish to memorialize those agreements wtthfn a Memorandw of Understanding; Now, therefore, be it reso ived the Assoc is tlon and Board agree as follows: 1. All current conditions of employment not altered or changed by this Memorandum of Understa~irg shall remsin in full force and effect for the duration of this agreement. 2. The effect/re date for ali items within this Memorandum of Understar~dtng shall De Hfeetive July 1, 1990, mnlas tpecifleaily shied to the contrary. 3, A cost of living adJustment of 6S of base salary tha n De granted. 4, The annual uniforta purchasing and melntenance allowance shall be fncreased to 5425.00 annually. Additionally, elfect/ve July 1. 1991, all uniformed personnel will be required to purchase and wear as part of their work shift uniform the new style slack cut pocket pants. 5. The following leave time shall De included as time worked toward the calculation of overtime as overtime fs required pursuant to the Fa 1r Laoor Standards Act (FLSA): Included: Bereavement, tn,lury on duty, sick leave, vacation, holiday, and Jury duty. Excluded: Military leave. work Period: The work period for the computation o} FLSA overtime will be 14 days. 6. F1 re Inspector salary range will be equal to a Fire Engineer salary range. T, Ffre Inspector standby Day will be SS of the E step of a Fl re Engineer, Mesorandus of UMerstanding Page 2 8. Holiday pay for F1re Inspector - Fire Inspectors are entitled to take the number of hours off for a holiday equal to one day equivalent of the normal hours worked in one day. Nowever, the nusDer of holidays Is equal to the total number of holidays granted Dy the F1rc District (i.e. 4/10 shift equals 10 hours as 1 day hollday~, 9. Implementation of an educational rcisbursecent program. The Drograe Is the same program offered to the C1ty of Rancho Cucasonga employees. The progras allows for rcimbursesent of out of pocket expenses (up to a spetlfted caucus) Incurred in the pursuit of a degree fros an accredited college ar university. The expenses are rclcDUrsed upon successful .completion of a course with a grade of "L" or better and for pass/fall classes with a "pass", and submittal of receipts showing the costs for the course. Relsbursement is for tuition, books, supplies, parking, lab expenses, and miscellaneous expenses for Uking LAe course(s). Re lmbursesent does not Include mileage or gasoline reimbursement or work hour pay. The cazicuc tuition reimbursed is set on a fiscal year basis with the total reimbursed being the average of the costs for course work at Callforota State University Fullvttn, G1 Poly Poaona, and Giifornla State University San Bernardino. For fiscal year 1990/91 the acxiaan relmbursecent 1s up (1500. 10. When the Rancho Cuuconga Fire District increases its canning assignment fora truck or engine company to 4 lnvidlvuets, Goth sides agree to meet and confer regarding minimum rnntng lerela. Nin tmuc rnning w111 be 3 msn engines, 3 man Lroek, 2 man squid. Hoverer, situsttons amy occur in which squad say be down manned for ptrlods of time less than 6 Murs. 11. Begyinning with ~}L aad confer nt9ot1atlons for fiscal year 1991/92 sultiyxr ptektgs w111 bt ntgotiatM w as to kelp w1tA the philosophy of negotlatton on off tlecLiona years. The Association and Board agree that no changes to this agreement or Current conditions of emptoyamnt witMn the scope of sett and confer v111 be discussed or changed without express written consent and agreement of Doth parties. If a court vlth proper ,lur/sdictton deterslnes that any singlt provision of this Memorandum of Understanding 1s Inwlld, Lhe remtining provisions of tMs agreecent shall remain va11d and in full forte unless othenrlse agreed to Dy the Association and Board. . /' V Meamrandum of Understanding Page 3 This agreement is entered into this 20th day of June 1990. This Memordandum of Understanding is recommended Lo the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Board for adoption and to the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Fire Fighters Association for ratification by: For the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firc_fig~At~~_ers~~ASSactatlon: ~f'a~~ res ent Rancho Cucamonga Professional Flreflghters Association ,/ M ke age m ,--, 3am~pagnoT~ J ~_ Kev n Na tan For the Rancho Coeaaonga Fsrc Protection Board: m Hart Administrative services Director ~~ Mary Ku ers- onneT Tec n1c an ~/! ~ Ken ernes Agreement This agreement is entered into by and between the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters Association, (herein after referred to as "Association") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Board, (herein after referred t0 as "Board"). whereas, the Board ordered the comDl et ion of a classification and compensation study; and Nherea s, the classification and compensation study has Deen completed and the consultants recommendations have Deen accepted and now the Board wants to implement the study; Now, therefore, De it resolved, the Assoccation and Board agree as follows: 1. The Board wf shes to implement the philosophy of compensation utilized for the City of Rancho Cucamonga employees; that Detng, compensation at the average of the identified survey cities plus 5S. 2. The philosophy of compensation at the average of the identlfted survey cities plus SS will be implemented in the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Districts current 5 step Plan (A-E). 3. Adjustments to compensation based on the results of the compensation study are as follows: a. 3f effective July 1, 1990. b. SS effective January 1, 1991. c. 2f effective Apr11 1, 1991. 4. May 1st of each year, a survey of the Identified labor market cities will be completed, reviewed Dy the Association and Board, and used as the comparison basis for any negotlatlons regarding market equity adjustment and cost of living adjustment tf ad,iustments are needed and not conditioned Dy a provlston of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Association and Board. Page 39 SECTIONS: Formal Grievance Pro !t~R A. Step I The employee and/or his representative shall present his grievance, in writing and signed, to his immediate supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the date that cause for s grievance arises., An official grievance form must be used staling names, dates, times, place, and nature of grievance. The employee's supervisor shall attampt to resolve the grievance with the employee and shall submit his decision in writing [o the employee within three (3) days after receipt of the grievance. The employee shall have the right to appeal the decision of his supervisor to the Fire Chief. Step II If the grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction of tha employee the grievant has three (3) days following receipt of the written response from his supervisor to file a written appeal to the Fire Chief or his designated ~ representative. Written appeal to the Fire Chief or his designated representative shall consist of the statement of the grievance and shall include a statement by the grievant's representative setting forth the reasons why the response of the employee's supervisor did not satisfactorily resolve the grievance and an indication of the action desired by the grievant. After submission of the written appeal, the Fire Chief or his designee shall reply within three (3) days, in writing, to the grievant regarding the grievance. In event of rejection, reasons for so doing will ba included in the response. ~^ ~ Page 40 C Step III If the grievance is not resolved by the Fire Chief or his designee to the satisfaction of the grievant, the grievant may, within three (3) days, then file a written appeal to the District Board of Directors, An appeal to the Board must include a complete statement of facts supporting the grievance, a statement by the grievant or representative setting forth the reasons why the Fire Chief or his representative did not satisfactorily resolve the grievance and a list of witnesses the grievant would call to testify. The grievant may request a formal hearing before the Board and, further, may reques[ the hearings to be a closed personnel session. The Board shall schedule such hearings within ten (10) days after receipt of the request. The Boud shall submit its decision, in writing, to the employee within ten (10) days of the date of the hearing. [f ao submittal is made, the grievance shall be deemed rejected and the decision of the Fire Chief sustained. D Step IV ` 1. if the grievance is not settled in Step III,. binding arbitration may be invoked in accordance with the following: . a. The request for arbitration must be submitted within ten (10) days of receipt of the decision of the Board of Directors. b. A "Fact Sheet" must be submitted to the arbitrator by both parties, stating [he nature of the grievance and desired action. c. The term "arbitrator;' as used herein, shall refer to a single arbitrator. d. A list of five (5) arbitrators shall be requested from the California State Conciliation Service, The hearing arbitrator shall be chosen by an initial flip of a coin, with the winning side, Board or grievant, ~ ~ Page 41 having the first choice of either selecting the arbitrator or eliminating one candidate. The turn shall then revert to [he other side, who then can exercise the same option. This procedure continues until either an arbitrator is agreed upon or there is only one candidate remaining. e. The arbitrator so selected shalt hold a hearing a[ a time and place convenient to the parties involved. Statements of position may be made by the parties, and witnesses may be called. The ubitrator shall have the initial authority to determine whether or not the dispute is arbitrable under the express terms of this agreement. Once it is determined that the dispute is arbitrable under the terms, the arbitrator shall proceed in accordance with [he provisions of this Rule to determine the merits of the dispute submitted to arbitration. f. The location and time of the bearing shall be mutually agreed upon by both puties. If as agreement cannot be achieved, each party will ti submit their location and time to be drawn by chance. g. All expenses which may be involved in the arbitration proceedings shall be borne by the panics equally; however, expenses relating to the calling of wimesses or the obtaining of depositions or any other similu expenses associated with such proceedings shall be borne by the poly at whose request such witnesses or depositions arc required. h. Legal counsel may be obtained by either party if they so wish. Expenses for [he legal counsel shall be borne by the puty obtaining such counsel. i. The pay far the ubitratot will be based upon the fee charged by the California State Conciliation Service for such services. r ( Page 42 j. Failure on the part of the District's representative or grievant/grievant's representative to appear in any case before an arbitrator, without good and sufficient cause, shall result in forfeituro of the case and responsibili[y for payment of all costs of arbitration borne by the party failing to appear. k. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the District and appellant. Page 6 B. Survey Cities: Now, therefore, be it resolved, the Union and District agree as follows: The District wishes to implement the philosophy of compensation u[ilized for the City of Rancho Cucamonga employees; that being, compensation at the average of the identified survey cities plus 596. The cities azea as follows: Fullerton Ontario Riverside West Covina Pomona San Bernardino City Corona Orange Upland 2. The philosophy of compensation at the average of the identified survey cities plus 596 will be implemented in the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's cutreat 5 step plan (A-E). 3. May 1st of each year, a survey of the identified labor market cities will be completed, reviewed by the Union ~ and District, and uscd as the comparison basis for any negotiations regarding market equity adjustment and cost of living adjustment if adjustments are needed and not conditioned by a provision of an agreement between the Union and District. i RANCHO CVCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS IAFF LOCAL 2276 GATE: MAY 17,1993 T0: The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Board c/o Bob Dominguez FROM: The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Fighters - Local 2274 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO REPLY FROM MR. DOMINGUEZ DATED MAY 13,1993 CONCSRNZ NG GRIEVANCE DATED MAY 12, 1993 Local 2274 is aware of the current political and economic conditions facing the Fire District and have been negotiating with this in mind. The Local is aware that the provisions of the grieved section of the MOU does not require the Local to accept the five percent above average pay increase, but that the Board must make it available. Unfortunately, the reluctance of the scard to grant any pay/benefi[ increases and the break off of negotiations has required us to pursue a grievance in this matter. On May 13,1993, Mr. Dominguez denied, in writing, the grievance filed on May 12,1993 by Local 2274 for being untimely and holding no merit according to Article II: Section B(2) and B(3). The Local believes the grievance ie timely and holds merit. In the denial of the grievance Mr. Dominguez states the Local did not implement or utilize this provision (Article II: Section 1:B) for fiscal years 1991/1992 and 1992/1993. He further states the Local did not challenge or grieve the Districts failure to comply with the provision. He states the grievance is well beyond the fifteen day (15) filing period because of this. His response on timeliness is to[ally without merit. The Local did request the District to honor this provision of the contract in negotiations for 1991/1992. The Locai and the District were unable to reach agreement on a contract for the 1991/1992 fiscal year because of the Boards unwillingness to honor this provision and to compromise on ary other items. The Board of Directors subsequently passed Resolution N0. FD 91-011 and FD 91-G11A ending the negotiations. The negotiations for the 1992/1993 contract started in early 1992. The five percent (58) above average provision was requested as the number one item on a list of 18 items. Negotiations were started with then Administrative Services Director Jim Hart. Linda Daniels took over for Mr. Hart when he left. After getting nowhere in negotiations with Ms. Daniels, a grievance was filed basically stating the same thing as the current grievance. This grievance was dropped for several reasons. The City stated they wanted to wait for a permanent Administrative Services Director and they felt it was too early in the budget process to assess the economic impact. The Local felt this was a reasonable request and the grievance was not pursued. On January 6, 1993, The Local received a Memorandum (attached) stating the City's willingness to meet and confer as necessary for the 1992/1993 fiscal year. On January 14,1993 the Local signed a D;OU that contained many of the provisions of previous contracts, but did not contain a pay raise or enhanced benefit package. Since then, the Local and the City have met to secure a contract on a pay/benefit package, but have not reached an agreement. On May 6, 1993 the union declared an impasse. This is the day we feel the Local was grieved as we felt continued meetings would not accomplish anything after the Board refused any pay increase at all. The Local is easily within the fifteen (15) day period from the day of the impasse and therefore the grievance is valid on this point. Mr. Dominguez feels the basis for the grievance is without merit. He quotes half of Secticn B(2) and uses this as the whole of his argument. The complete Section states: 'The philosophy of compensation at the average of the identified survey cities plus 58 will (our emphasis) be implemented in the Rancho Cucamonga Fize Protections current S step plan (A-E).' Clearly this plan, even though it is stated as a philosophy, ie to be implemented. Mr. Dominguez then again partially quotes Section B(3). He indicates that such survey data is to be "used as a comparison basis for any negotiations." He is right in saying that when we negotiate, this is the section that applies a basis for the cost of living increases. The last part of this section clarifies this and was conveniently left off by Mr. Dominguez. It says: ...and used as a comparison basis for any negotiations reca dins ma k i v adi m and o r of 1'v'na adiu m n a if adi ~ m n ~ ar n d d and no conditioned by a ~rovicion of an aar m n b w n h Union and District.' This statement clearly states that during negotiations for salaries, the survey is to be used as a basis for determining pay. If ad7'ustments need to be made, and as long as no other provisions of the agreement condition this, the pay will be 58 above the average of the survey cities as stated in B(2). Finally, the Districts financial condition does not preclude salary increases. This is a myth imposed on the Local and [he employees and not backed up by the budget. In fact, the, Districts financial situation is considerably better than the Board would like to admit and the reason for denying pay raises is purely political in nature. If the Board of Directors felt that the financial situation was significantly different three years ago when this Section was put into the MDU, then why didn't they attempt to change it when they signed the most recent MOU scheduled to expire June 30, 1993? It is obvious, the Board is grasping at straws in an attempt to block any pay increases for the Local. They have not honored the MOU, they have passed resolutions with ro pay raises, they have not budgeted for pay increases in violation of the MMBA even though money was available, they have denied grievances for almost any reason they can dream up, and have stalled or simply refused to negotiate. The Local therefore requests a hearing before the Board, concerning this grievance, per Article IV: Section S:C of the MUU. The Local requests the ~~. hearing to be a closed personnel session. (It should be stated, that on May 13,1993, Mr. Dominguez said that his further handling of the grievance would be fruitless and a Board hearing should be the next step.) The Local reserves the right as stated in the grievance procedure to call the following witnesses as needed to resolve this issue. !,.-., Tom Salisbury Go-cRichard Shore u~.- Dave Larkin Pr,~~y Mary Kuhn Jeff Carter~•~ N~,Kevin Walten • Steve Campbell Jim Hart - Dennis Michael - Linda Daniels 'Mike Eagleson ~~Tim Wessel 'Robert Dominguez Alex Ahumada .S'rvM~c /162./+_ gel ~~~ ~r~r FC~,,~6~Gf ,___ ~ -CITY OF RANCHO CUCA..,ONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 13, 7993 TU Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Local 2274 c/o Midwel Eagleson and Steven Campbell FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Directq ,~~i9 SUBJECT: BESPONSE TO CRIEV N OF aY 72 79A~ Your grievance dated May 12, 1993, has been referred to me by Fire Chief Dennis MfchaeL The union alleges that Article II, Section I(A) has been violated by the District. As a threshold matter, Article IV, Section 5(A)(1) of the current Memorandum of Understanding requires in part: I. 'The employee and/or his representative shall present his grievance, in writing and signed, !o his immediate supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the date that cause for a grievance arises." The protvion you are grieving was placed in effect for fuical year 1990/91. The provision was not implemented/utilized for fLscal yeah ]991/92 and 1992/93, At no time did the union challenge/grieve the District's failure to comply with the provision. A grievance filed at this time is untimely, well beyond the fifteen (IS) ~y ~8 period set forth as due. Even if your grievance were timely, the basis of your grievance would be without merit. Section B(2) of the grieved provision establiahea (the philosophy of compensation." Section B(3) indicates that such survey data rs to be "used as the comparison basis for any negotiatIona." No where is there any guazanteed contractiual right to a salary increase. Section B(3) clearly contemp-ates that the survey data is subject to the negotlatioM or meet and confer, process. As you well know, the District's fmandal condition has precluded salary increases, The parties have engaged to a lengthy meet and confer process, the District is not in a position b implement a "philosophy of compensation" that was established three years ago what the District's finandal position was slgnificantiy different. Therefore, your grievance is denied. RCD/dah ~ Jack Lent, AICP, City Manager Fire Chief Dennis Michael RANCHO q" ^AMONGA FIRE PRO'1'EC1'Iq" DISTRICT EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE FORM Dance shall npt interlMe wiM Me tanrul wale rauline. %ease type or print legibly in A sgaanre sheet d paper rtu y 6e amdad i(mare space is needed) Employee NameRancho Cucamonga Firefighters/local 2274/IAFF Title Reco¢ni zed bar¢aining group Supervisor L. Dennis Michael Divisior/Shift/Station unguez NatureofGrieranee: Failure to pay wanes as required by Memorandum of Understanding Rule/Policy/Agreemerf, Etc., Alleged to Have Been Violated: Article II: Section 1:e Adjustment Desired: 7o have the Board pay the employees Shat are represented by local 2274 as required by the Memorandums of Understanding, Article II: Section 1:6 commencing Dec. 17,1992. Employee Represent. .. ~ ~y.~/fit ~ 1 wr,s TAi~eN oN A I~FIL~D ToU~" of LIV~p+~~. tN AN ~lTt-~ n~PT To SUtsTIF y ~K~ 13, 5!0 AC'R~s ~~t~1Y Cosr ~ ~~~3g9.55 PEA Ac~E Tu ri1 N ~r~-. Ftir~ . AS P~Rr ~~ 1~~T Ac~e~c E ~ WAS st-1owt,~ C~REENBE~TS 'i~tar a~E ~e-nn~uy ~JAtr=C~~D RNA c~tT e~~ Y~~ l~4ornEowlvci~2S , (+1>r otit_~ ~:~roNS~~it,~Ty ~rFtE ~t~ ctry {-tr~S ~rv -r~tusE F~;~~;t~S aRE ~+~E -tr~~ ~ S t,~fllc~~ r~rz ~1F1'C~R~O R y "(t-~E I~O~i~GJJNCfZ, ENE -r~ZE~ p,cco~r=TS Fcr; No n~of~C '(!/Ir\t~ bc~t~ S~~;t;rjrt~ ~o off, S UJAS A~s~~ .sttc~vN GRAu~i. UJ~1t_~;lu{1\~S s o~Yti/ ~ F ilJ t~ ~ G El lu'En E l,J;/~ ~ >~j L~._C:D , IOW (11~tC~l L'C~,S lT CAST '"l o n1i-1iNT.}~ItU ~-R~vz~ ? UJI~S CLtnll/N ~ ~tti~l,{'(~~% /S~DD1Vt5loN c;~-~-`~\ 13A~hEN La,vu cov~>zcn w ~tt-l wt~~ Gr~ow~rN _ ~ ZF '(~11 s S ~ T~ ~ s ~ ~ U DLO 1'E D 1`C ~,~ t trL '6'E T~ GtT~.~ ACCEP~s 1t~~ ~f\RE o~ ~(~I+~r ~~ACRENG-t~\~ . F~ocv~ v.1F~gT I wAs SE}oViN T r1m NoT CONVINCC.~ ~t~r S Any r E-ri ~N~ my I~ar~~y's ~vo~T~4, T~ ~r~cr 1~ `r'ov, R..(~,o~~ ENE "PoR~ FAT~~ FRoryi `(Nt/ PCTII~\L t-l~hE ~ i tt~ CosT (DER RCr;E I,~1~~ PRo~P.~l.`~ Ar~PP~o~CFt A Cc~ i cF 1430,000 ('~r;'. r~LC~E, ~(<; ~ ~C~i\ ~' o ~ ~~~5~ O~SCRURTto~vS ~I.~S~ RNS>AE~ ~~~ Fot_LOwiNU QuEs-noNS, 1, CAN y~~ ('~Ea,~e. s~-nw m~' N~IC}1P,o~S MUD 11\yS~,~,~ EN /1 QLO~ Vt~W i'1'l~P EF OuF DtsTRiC,'C IuFF~E you PGraN I a SPED ~13~~a~-lD.up Iti l-AtJ~S~rtP~ /tND TReE rnAir~ i~aNc~ P~~vO ~~w you C~nl~ 2. CAN y~~ s Ko~J 1ti~ la t~riZ~ yc~u f~czE DOING 7b SptNO ~t 3c~~Oc~d.ca iN l-1'`N-SC.APG p~}~NT ~~A'(I:CZIiEI_ t~~NOU~\'I ION -~ ANO R ~R~KDoWt~ Or y~Ule ~STi1~1RT~~ ~xp~Nr~t'C~A(ZES DETf~ll.l~G UJ!lF~T yok PLArJ To b u ~, ? 3, C~~; yot~ SIIoJJ Ins A cosT ~-~t;Y~K.~owN DF~ "(NE ~~ (~ao0, ba ~-t' '(AK>/S t~ A3tiT~ l~~~DS IN 'C61~ No ~, ~MrnU~UiT SARK Sire ` ~~Ny CANT y~~ LEAVE~`IT S~NCO 11-4t~~ AEZE NO CUR'~~N~ ~1,11NS rt-o P~vE~n~ iY? ~T P~Dsol~s ~ N+1~C~if;i\~ SP~CE~RI~SI~ RR~, a , CAt~ ~~~~~ o r- ~t'~!t. cos- ? sHo~~~ us ^~ lo,(~~iG<oo y>, DE'(A1LED 111AI~~Te~v~N~E g~'! ~~ Dc~ ~,~N Rn~i~ D~('GY'r,~~or; S CAN y01,~ S{•~DW ISIS A ~R~{~p~~ of 'f~~ ~~ ~~~ ~5~, Oo WS~ FDR aSSGSS~,I~N'f ADMtNIS~(~~~(I,OtJ ~Np C7~N~YtAL DUEIZKE~O? (9 , ~ ~l'~ ~1(' ~ W ~ '~ ELF 1Z~ S P o cJS i ~L~ FD (Z DTIk~-1Z P~OP~~S pcLl+~t~~EN~C" 7"AX~S ~ '(~11S ~~~l~f. ycu fk2E StFnWiNG ~~45~I1~v.~~ !~= ~E~~tUC~u,~Nr T~Xr/s (,~~ICH is I(fl~lo o F ~f kl~ QupGET , ~j~~'~l S~t(~ I~ '(N;~ FIC~ST 1111;•I;1~INCr ~k4A'C ~~~'~~ COt_~EC,T PEUtvc~uEyvT 'C1~.yf:;S ik1" S~~~titG rOINT"s Sr ~ o W}}GY~E; D~ Wt; SEE 1~ t_~t~~ l"~t.~~ IN T}iG ~'jUDGE'( ~~cPKDUW~J '~0(` ~~ CoLL~C1 L(~'I oR ~'P.~Cou~cO'~ D~I.It~1~l.~~t~~C ^,FIX~S ~~.Uc'~ pRE'~lOlls tJ~~-l`iJ(~~~NCIC S ~, ~~ W~ poNT L~/~1J"r' To PHI ~O(~ GTytE~Z sr:12v~~s o~ cDt,~~.cT y~uc` -rAUt/s ~,;~ ~~~N-C L14~E RtiN~CRL PP.c~('~Ty. At Lc~sr 'Ck\~'( ~,~.l~ti~.,~ P~"oPc,v U~ti.~ KNOW BEroRE -~ttE~ I~~OVE ir,;T~ ~ttE ~tREt~ T~tAT ~tkEy l~ll~l. BL ~XpECT~b Ta PA~~ FoR NoT 0'Nt_ ~(F4ti~R nwN '1"R1lE.S yji,t~ S oMEO r\1~ EIS E 5 ~ I.s~• 8, ~~~ C IY I~TfR t~~1~ S 10 ~ 7~ a F ~"I~ G R1~-C~ INC'RE~6 Ta ~~F6 RA~C"~ ~NGR~PtSE 81~- ccwD a cc~ D ~~; -r~.~tv s~~rr/s T~r~T i1-t~iR iNGR~SE ~s GNt,~ ACGv~~NT~1~lrE ~~ a~`~~ d~ 'Clk~, CITI~ ASS~SSrtit~N-r Ih1CR~SE, WN~7 1S T~l,U~1G- 1'~l~ Tl~lt~t{ -? ~. Some; car ~s ARE aE,~~ ou~rZ ASS ~ ss~ ~oR mEt,~ - i2o6S c~~ 88-I RNG CPS ~ ~-2 , ~(4k~SE PSSE55rn~NTs ASE L~ek5~9 oN "(I;~~ SQUFiRE FD 0'(i\G~ 0i' dUVZ HDr~t~S_ UJN~ Do '~~4~ C.tTI~ fZ~ CoRO S !voT ACCUR.EZ4~TbL Re~t.EG i '(N~ P,CTU,I~L S ~IUf~RE ~0 OTf~~S 0>' OU tZ lkDwtCS ? W~R~ NoT ~utt,DiNG- P~'Ri~~~~ts 1ssuED ~~, '(t-4~ G~Ty T~ T4t~ fli/V~l,op-12 OF 0~~ 1-40Y~~ES ~ ~10U~p NOt T-HE PER~~~~~~ I'N~Or>,n'l~'C1,oN REQktR~ PL{~NS SNvwic~Cr sQua~E FoOT~C~ o~ YttE HoinESr, 10 ~ l~1 N~~ ARi' ~~E I rJ (110fe~N ~~tu/+1n/D~1 T+f~ ONLY OrJGS PA~in1G- F~r~ CAD ~~-2-~ D~~trunG6 ? ~J~ Y~2E ~nylti~ Fad l,ocn~, Aran ftR'(~`I~~ S'(REEC L-IG-~{'~S ArvD '~Pt14`i'lG SIGNt\~.5, SLR ~ I mr„~ SI,D~ 2~ IN A~~itS 0~ '(II'~ CiT~`~ ~R(~ p~,~Ts~nE NORTPt 1:'~IU~f1rUDt\, 4S14~~~ ~ ~~~ ~(i~oS ~cPEOP~~ ~ N~R6 IN o,, r^os1s~; -- 11. 5~ to v ~ nlo~R E o F Tl~ g~tflG6T fo ~ SLD ~ l r~nJ~ SI~D~ 2 is Fat ~L~G'(RIGITy . CRtJ Wl; TURN ©FF ~ U~'R~ D'(1~R ~TR~'~ L1 G-~4T 1z~ NAUC (3or~D5 g.~gN SoLp ~7(~ CAD 6~-~? SF NoT, l,v~Y ? S~ NoT, W~ER~ ~s ou{2 Tex r2oYJG~f ~OIZ T~ l S l"~~rn Cro r ril G ~ SS ~ T IN F mD ~~~ I~11~FZKE T ~rnNp oR S°"~~ O'~~ P~C~uN'F y1~EL~rNG /~ Con1PE'(~Tlu~ INT~iZ~sT RATE ? GNAT ~s ~~ INT>12EST Rr~TE~ (THEN ~1~L '(l,~ ~ orJD a~ So~D ? S}lau~~ rv'r ICJ E Do i t N o ~.J W~ 11. E ~ rv'CcR~st" ~ZAT~S ~P~ DoWN ? W~ Llh~ Ou,YZ G~T~ ~ ~E Ltt;~ ouV2 ~~~~t,~~~~as S t_tKC ~Pcm80R Nn,l~s ~ti~ ~r~cLtrttzs , ~~~~ NOI,J ~ c~~~ l~~Fo(~p 1 lkEtY~ ~tiD ~n rky ~E (Z l G-N 1" N o c~J T1-I't; CtT~,. C/~n1~TU I~~~OKD T''J }~AU~ OuVZ CR~1Uw~-~~S Loc~K ~t~<E l~~ A2~ L~vi~v~ _ 1 N L~ ~~~u Ik o R F~, r ~D ~ oR F~ous-t~ mla~~~G w~ C~:w ~In~~l~l~ ~~ F~n~ouN't" o~ P~~~TS, tr~~~"Rt.,~ RIP s~~~~TErv~ s, 'D0 1~I,vAt; 'vJ t'C~C`, ~A"(~ ~"'ul~ICrl2~ GfzOuND C~V~S ~ l>,sE Tpe~s JEI~~i'}S r1i~,'p ~t l~(~D sCV~P~ ~ ~~ L~UE I~ Fl tulrv0~J PESEr',T CtrtmR~. UEst~-rJ ~ccor<pivGLU 1~.-CT i,~~ t,~oRK I~t~Ck1 `~oll ~'~S~oND . CVU I~K~~ i o A,EPo(ZTS o~ bb;oKEN ~6zlrvKl.ETzs AND S!'~tNKLERS ~NRT RAN I~JK~N tT is R1~iN1NG 0'~ LE-` 1,5_1-~RVE 'C~~ C({PA~II.tT~ ~b T611~iJ 'Sl~ri~ OAF, ~F UJ~ ft~E 'B~IGVCr ~UtiC~C~R~G~ Fo(Z PUt,I,IN~- I~JEEDS IN C~Rr~VEL ~UALKUJN~1,s .Z~ll Q, G~~N "t-~ HELP K~ '(l~~n 1,U ~~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ . ~tr~t/ ~s It oil UJ ~ C~7v KEEP CosTS bc~~ N , A~ Fi~R As ~ttisiNG AsSeSSm~,fis ~~~~,~ '~, uiZC G ~;4ie GlT(~ Cok~vc,tl. i J vow {lGl';tNS l I T L±~~J~II~ '(N~ U (,~T~ STc~~tCrNT~~S l,tP TNT ~~Rot~1,~7~'15, CI,~I~n~S UP trs AC,'r ~rvD DElt1~NS-~ie~1~r~S ~T7~ US ilzt~r;oucnl~u~ ~1 RE~o~mA~l~~ IN ITS w~~ o F DDING bus tr~ESs . S pltZGl; >-~prnEOW~~Tz5 T6 QRGt'~n717~ O~~D~~S \N Jl,(tZ "'(~ES~EC'(lVt/ QIS"~RIC'« T>5 I NV~ST l ~ +~~~ yaU.'~ g ti~ G ET5 ,~ N D '(~E G1TlT~ CL~~ ~ ~E~RA I~9HmS P ~ i o R -~ TN-~ N ~ x-r kT ~'~1>`' c ro Cs DP~-r~~ L~~1b~~3, "(~}IS INFpRl~1~'C(AnJ is 4N ~IoU~ ~kss~ssnltrvT N~-(ICES, ~~ . n~~~ flECE1VED ~,~,{~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG^ //'_ CITY CLr.RK Mar z~, 1993 MAY 2 6 1993 C~~J , 7'819'1 IDI 111 L2'11 Z1314~5 X61 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Property Owners Notices dated April 21, 1993 Dear Sir: Tttis lettur is to serve as a protest for the teccrt proposed assessments of landscape improvements and street lighting for Districts No. 7, Nu. i and No. 2 dated April 21, 1993. Through ho [h our annual property and special assessment taxes (Mello-Roos), we are currently paying §400 monthly of cosmunity taxes. As 3 year residents of the new North Etiwanda community, we are aware that [here will be ongoing costs £or the improvements of the immediate area. However, as residents, we have contributed our fair share of taxes and cannot withstand any Further regular increases. Furthermore, these tax increases have been for improvements on the outskirts of the region we live in. As of ye[, we have not seen any improvements in parks, public facilities, walkways, find lighting that sub- stantiate these extreme increases. Unfortunately, if both the city and the county continue to impose further tax collections that are no[ warranted collectively by the residents of [his community, then homeewnera such ae ourselves will be forted to reeide else- where. Please, as a final thought, I am sure all of you are taxpayers as well. Isn't $400 per month in taxes enough financial burden for one family to endure? Sincerely, 7 ~~ \, /' ° Q Il j/ Jeffrey and Nancy Rumage 13997 San Dimas Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 PH: 909-R99-0462 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Sir: RECEIVED May 21, 1993 CITY OF C~CLERK MAY 2 51993 7'8'a'10'Iti 12111 2i3~~4'~516 Subject: Intent to Assess Annual Levy far Landscape Maintenance District 1 1 object to the proposed assessment of 592.21 per single family/multi-family unit. I do not think it is fair to charge this additional tax at all and why single out only Maintenance District No. i ~ Surely, the city doesn't think that people living in a particular geographic area in the city only use certain parks. Tne parks, neighborhood center, etc are for everyone's use. Surely the city must be getting additional money from the season parking fees and S2 parking fee charged at the Quakes Epicenter stadium. I feel S2 is a lot of money to just park on a dirt lot but we pay this money because we figure the money is going to the city. I strongly feel that the city of Rancho Cucamonga is going to cause people and businesses to move out of this city if they continue to impose additional taxes such as this proposed assessment. The city recently passed the utility tax, we have an entertainment tax and now Proposition U is on the June 9th ballot) The citizens of this city are definitely getting the message that the city needs more money to pay its bills but we just don't have the additional income. Sincerely, J/ay/ne Dam 6953 La Paz Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ~G ~%~6~ G CAMON . '~ cc ~. C~~ - W a Tr CLf"~ ~aic~~.~.~ s~ /Z.2,,este C~,.}~~r~..~.- h Z1 ,=r .. ~~-- m r ter. L . ~~~ /~5~ °1' . V N ...~ ¢ ^ _,vl iC 'ti~~_E- ~•{,mac. t.-.-~L: C.~C.`~ ILLS.-<: 1~ ~ ~ ... ~ r C~ "! t Y / ~ 6 'mot' ~~c% s~,c'~'"GL. .~~.:-~~C. ~=-die.-~,,..a~-. ~. ''/ .~-..-~~~-`: ... ~ ''L 9-~<> _.. _~.'_~~ o~v - ~d~C t~~ _ cam, e~ - ~} - ---- - ~< d O ._.. - - -- ~,~~ ~ C ~C-a ~C_t~ Cc-t-//cam -. ""~-' /C..,LLZ/ "'C ,CSC. C.1 ~'.C~G-2 ~ ~+ r. -1~c~~L~ .~..,,. •.11'\ :)I 1\a.: ill:'.' L.''.1'~al:))l~ili;a RECEIVED ~liY pF RANCRD ~'CAiADNC, ~ CITY CLFRK MAY 2 6 1993 '~,7yn~Y', Illi 1!112 ~,, 1~2i3~. q,5~61 L~ ~t~ ~~~ ~~ .. ''.' ~ ';• '.^.,^~'c- :~,.~ fc,•,),, lrorntest against ina'eased property (axes in our '''• ~"~'~~nr:'on~nr,,nert\laxe'aarca!readvlnohlgh i\nvincrea~ewouldsurely :::n n ;'c,rder. rr ~, r,,,. I;ou;ehoiu W'tti! the stag ui the economy', the IaVOits taking p'~r:':: ',^. '.'. ~ re;;:'.~~,~,, ,u•,d t'r~c fac± t'•~at m,nst nt;y res;c!ents who have been able to keep n..,'` "'''" "'„':' . ~ .. 'ec' .~^ increase In salan• in over five years (which i=, oar "~\ar,nn: !: •:erm. aimnat ndiculnus that the C-ily of Kancho Cucamonga would .v^''^ ~:'r, •! v~nu nn~e .q! ri?~ lq;ht. at our new 5tadnnn. instead ni oharging us for ~~I„ rn~,ani iwi)t iriie i hr: +ladmm hoc bath of ns m an Uproar II surely was .ul .~• `•. ":,."• .. ~~~~ •. :t,ns'.i Ja l\)\U''. r; :iii J w\•i ilia lUl nc'N Ut`. pui }\ iC: la tl',IUJ ,I ' .~ :. ~ .., ~ ~ ' r: •~ry ,r,,d ti-~c 'rst ;hmg yn+-~ :w.!: ~a'as a sen^ t,. o ',,,....:..:,: ' '~ ' ' ''. n-•'•,' ,.:;~ p:e cinieirrn pla•;~ N'hy wa.=, this semrprn spnrtti ~teanl '- .' m~,.,'~. ~:~„•,1 n, n: n' 1'ailrtrc when wo cunporfed more parks for Ihp ~.:' ~ ^.,~..'., ..~ • rer:a<' r;. \;t)te for the mavrr and a- other crunai members '..~' ~u~r,, m'.., , : a'ir:ng tiara dcrwu)n and Jecclt lY'c aru so angry about thts ~v ~ ': !':'' :~aadnlr:~ .n ,: t„mi~~ a„~:~~. ,!„u Is ,opposed tosuppcrf_ edu~atiun and play ....~ '., ~.'~ , :""'.:,. ~...., a;'. '. r;, ~.'. r, re;uiC any additional taxes, and look . ,-' ,~. '•,~.i,,..,•p t ,•,hr". ,,,, the ~'Itv (::;unctl width tho<o who truly cart' .,I-n:d ~,::. rr.nv„nnvv,~ ~.,,,.,, ~ ~;,,1,,, :. i,::;..:~,~i>t , \:111; .i1Y0F RECFjy® Cc 1-d1fL'I~~tI' `E~ ~ 1 aim ~~,~~ ~~~ rUiv` 7~.er~ ~ !!r~~?~lr~~ l/rCc'ir~lt r~ ~ `~/u ~~?rrl~~i~r y ~~~iz zi.~ j ~~ ^~z2<' I~6u GG~d 2~' ~`/rv /2~/~° 51~ mil l~x~ ~~/7C~2f~i~ • ~fy ~~C G~~~ ' hCt' G7 Cr~G~ ~ ~' GL~1-n. ~a~~z,~zr~t ~~, ~r,~.~uez'. /.riP ~c~ ~`/~~2~i~/z~~.~ l'dlliL~ji ~ ~'~d ~~ ~ Cl ~ f1Jz /~~ . ~~ Gam. ~r~~ .~,~ ~~~%' ~r~.~`, ~ re./I Gc-~~~d. ~lev~Q! z`/7~ f~G~1~~~j- erg z`f;~ ~!zc/f1 f~~~~^ ,~~'raai,-/sue/ l~~z`{L 7f,~ ~~Gil~ L,~ .K~~i' /7'JCIG~d1 t, /7-.~1'lf~L7 7G ~//JL 'GC/ l/1~' ~!!~J/lt' . Lll;~ ~`LLJG /~" [ /t~G lriY/C/ /iCl//~~' /lam/ d~ //TLI ~ /.fill~7~ ~ ~/`,r,/!l'!/lZ /G ~z~~~G/~ll~.oit ,~'-f~i ~Cr ~r7 ~~i /ZI~U C2,l5~`~ GC/dr~ eUCt L x-~i2~° ,.,G,eG~ij ~,~lv .~~ lr~liaEl ~2er~ ~ n Sri h~r~-~~ i~i2«~a, ,~v G~f ~ ~~~ ~~ rxe now r Mouae P. 50 p 1. 321 // Up 917 B31 MAv U aM, 9V ~~~~ 4,5a5 ~dRl ~uC~rna~ ~~tHf73o ~~~ c~ ~ RECEIVEfi JJ '..ITY OF RANi,HO Cli(.AAIONGP ~ t~ CITY CLERK City Clerk ~uN 611993 05/24/93 City of Rancho (.UCamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~~~ y I ]p ~~ lL I ~ 1 ~ R ~ 4 5 6i To whom it may Concern, This letter is being written to vice, in the strongest terms, my opposition to the proposed landscape and lighting district property tax assessment for District :Jo. 7. i DO NOT WAM' TO PAY MORE PROPERTY TAXES!!! I currently pay significant property taxes an my home (Which has fallen in value) as well as supplemental district assessments which provide a total tax burden of nearly $4,000.00 per Year• Enough is Enough!!! With the current climate of a struggling California economy, a depleted state treasury, a huge federal deficit and every local, state and federal agency angling for ways to increase taxes, it must be considered irresponsible to further burden the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, Glenn A. Brown' 13106 Arapaho Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 0225351010000 GB/bjs ~''~ ~~ c~ v WRITPEN PROTEST' TO A CERTAIN PROPOSED ASSESSMENT To The CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 Dear Sir/Madame: Greetings ! This serves to formalize our opposition &/or protest to .:iTY OF R RECERfEp ANCiW CUCAMORGA CITY CLERK JUN 011993 7i A9'10111)12'1123145161 'The assessment proposed ro be levied on those properties shown by the Assessors roll of the the County of San Bernardino pursuant to the existing landscape maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1:' Rationale of this formal protest a) homeowners are already heavily burdened with the property tax; b) property tax rate remains at a high percentage in relation to assessed value. the proposed assessment will mean additional tax btuden and will increase tax rate on properties; c) assessed values are arbitrarily high vis-a-vis current market value of properties; therefore, amount of property taxes being paid apparently is high; d) higher property taxes imposed during recessionary period is apparently untimely and unwelcomed by most homeowners. Done this 26th day of May, year 1993, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Respectfully yours, rG~ncltu ztGt--- RENATO UNTALAN X2175 Dairy Ciwrt Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97739 Hay 24, 1993 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: Second Public Hearing June 16, 1993 Dear Sir, CC ~~ w~,~ RECEIVEp ~~ RC KIGIMONGn JUN 01 ~g93 7 89 1e LI>21112131`16 Please be advised that xe are the oxners of the property located at 1426 Lomello Way, Rancho Cucamonga, California. We xant to protest any more fees, taxes, etc. We are paying enough as it is now. When to these extra charges and fees stop? Very truly yours, ~~~ ~~ RODNEY TIBHETTS 292 E. 5th Street Quincy, California 95971 city Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Diive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 To Whom it may CO11Cern: lL Monday, May 31, 1993 GitYpp ~OEIVFD ~g pgiNClER~k MONG!1 (f ` JUN 011993 7i 819'1U111112'1'21a el i i It is imperative that our government's leaders become acquainted with what is occurring in our communities. People are losing jobs by the thousands; our illustrious President has a new tax plan to take an additional 82,000 from our working families; our city has passed a utilities' tax, adding four more taxes to our burden; the water district is currently requesting an additional fee. As a local school teacher, my family has not had a raise in two years, and may even face cuts 1n the future (as many other districts in Southern California have). And YOU are now requesting an additional fee to maintain our medians, etc! My family has had to cut back our expenses; we have had to do with less. When is goverl.ment going to learn that, in times of less money, they SPEND LESS, NOT DRAIN THE TAXPAYERS FURTHER !?11! Medians should neveC even be built (nor should pretty signs entering ovr city) when we cannot adequately fund our schools, police, and other essential local Bove r~tment agencies. My family is TOTALLY OPPOSED TO ANY TAX ASSESSMENTS at th16 time. When you have a money shortage, cut back non- essentials as do the people in your community. Stop spending (or trying to spend) what you don't have. No society in the world has ever taxed itself into prosperity. Perhaps a simple economic lesson is needed here. The economy of an area only grows when people have money to spend for goods and services. If you continue to take Chat money from us, we have I,eyB,, not more to spend. When we spend leas, less is producefl, more people lose their jobs, etc. IL you really want to solve the problem, you will NOT pass this assessment. Sincerely, ~~ Doug Westlake 6073 Amethyst Alta Loma, Ca (~~~- 9t. 91737 dew Cc. WRI1-lEN PROTEST TO A CERTAIN PROPOSED ASSFSSMENl' To The CITY CLERK C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CMC CENTER DRMi RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 Dear Sir/Madame: Greetings ! This serves to formalize our opposition &/or protest to ~°. RECEIVED JITY OF RgNCHO CUCAMOryGA CIiY CLERK MAY 2 ? 1993 !~Ixl9'toutluuila a~s s 'The assessment proposed to be levied on those properties shown by the Assessor's roll of the the County of San Bernardino pursuant to the existing landscape maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1:' Rationale of this formal protest a) homeowners are already heavily burdened with the property tax; b) property tax rate remains at a high percentage in relation to assessed value. the proposed assessment will mean additional tax burden and will increase tax rate on properties; c) assessed values are arbitrarily high vis-a-vis current market value of properties; therefore, amount of property [axes being paid apparently is high; d) higher property [axes imposed doting recessionary period is apparently untimely and unwelcomed by most homeowners. Done this 26th day of May, year 1993, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Respectfully yours, CONSUELO UNTALAN 72275 Dniry Cnun Rancho Cucnmongu, CA 91739 %~ eat' w~+~~-7-~~ I Is ~d ~h~.I ~w~ ~'jyt coy-~'s 1 ~avC tc~cel'd~1 i~9 ~'~ /ate t e~ r~a~r~, L- ~ "no; ~ ~}~ I~X /nG.~' ~ lam. NI (: ~ M~~~I /4,nV CC~f 4 ;5 111 ~ ~~~'~ 3b USA 19 ~ ~ f y ~{e~~ io~-a~ C;v~~c D~ T H E C I Y O F '~ R L1 N C K O C U C~ M O N G~ May 17, 1993 Georgia A. Higgins 326 Lincoln Avenue Pomona, CA 91767 Dear Ms. Higgins: He have received your letter of protest regarding the proposed Increase assessment for Street L19ht Maintenance District No. 2 and will forward this letter to the City Counc7l for their considerstion. I would like to take this op ortunity to exptaln that the assess~eent 1s to maintain the street 11 ling ~or lace streets within the general cit~yy area. Your home is also 1n Street Lighting District No. 1 whicA provides Ciiy wide arterial street lighting and Landscappee Maintenance District No. 1 which provides maintenance for landscapirg within Lhat district. Please refer to the enclosed ma s for the areas the districts cover. The QQroposed increased ass ssment for these three districts, collectively, 1s t34.37 per year or t2.~6 per month. Please be aware, the City 1s meklny every attempt to ensure that assessments are as low as possible. There are however, facWrs bgyond the G1ty's control which could result in increases t0 the assessments. f r example, Cucamonga County Mater District has proposed a rate increase of 9 ~15t which will affect the assessment in the landscaping maintenance districts. The City has installed water saving devices and uses water saving landscaping whereever possible Lo keep the assessment rates as low as possible. If you have any questions or /f we can further assist you, please contact Lucinda Hackett at 989-1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ~.r/ Ni111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:diw Enclosure Mayor Dennis ~, stout councllmember wiiliam ~. Aieronoer Movor Pro~tem cnoiies .l auquet a Councilmember Diane Williams Jacr lam, AICP, Gty Mgnoger Counctlmember Ran Gutierrez 10500 Clvlc Center ~nve P O Box eel Roncno Cucomonga, CA 91749 19119) 9e9~IB51 FAx ~9M91 Vtl/ hdv/ q~ -~ n ~a a -e z 0 too '~ r~ ~~~ ~ n ~ ~ °~ z o o ~ a c-~ C C '' z o ,,y~ z a r d C~ .-~ d ~---~ ~--~ C"~ r. ~ q ~ ~~ C.q H 2 ~ CO "~i7 ra., a z z ~ 9 O ~ O C"~ C ~ ~ O .yC Z 9 it y LTJ y ~--., y ^~ ~ ` y ~~ ~~ d ~~ ~/~ y ~--~ C"'] y ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ z `` 0 00 `~ ~ z ~ =~~ °~ d o z o c~ ~ o c-~ c a z o ~~ -e c-, ~n - t~ t-~ '.~~ ~--3 d ~--a ~--~ ~""] ZV ~irypFq gE~ry~ ~~ ~~IEgK"°"~~f91MONA, CA 91787 E MAY j p X93 MAY 5, 1983 ~ U y lU ~~ ~Z, ~ z'~95f: DEBRA J. ADAMS CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 DEAR MS. ADAMS: HAVING RECEIVED MY NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS REGARDING A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER THIS LETTER A PROTEST TO THE IMPENDING ASSESSMENT. THE PROPERTY TAXES ON MY HOME LOCATED AT 8812 diEEKSIOE ARE VERY HIGH, AND I THINK THAT THE CITY HAS NOT USED GOOD JUDGMENT IN PERFORMING SOME VERY EXPENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS AT A TIME WHEN THE ECONOMY IS AT A VERY LOW EBB. IF, INDEED, THE ASSESSMENT 13 FOR STREET LIGHTS, I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT THE CITY GET THE FUNDS FROM THE COUNTY SINCE INCREASED TRAFFlC 13 UNDOUBTEDLY DUE, FOR THE MOST PART, TO THE CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX TIME, PROPERTY OWNERS AND SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS ARE THE BRUNT OF BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES. THEY ARE ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE STATE, NOT UNITED NOR POWERFUL TO MAID= dVIL AND F~Fr. rcn SERVANTS 1.14TFN rn T11FIH THAT SI ERELY, Q x GEORG A. HIGGINS ~L T H E C 1 T Y O F R t1 N C H O C U C t1 M O N G ~~ May 13, 1993 John R. Shedlack 10069 Iron Mountain Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Mr. Shedlock: Th1s setter is in response to our letter of May 10, 1993 regarding the proposed assessments for the Landscape and L1ghting Districts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. t would itke to take this apportunlty to explain that these ere not rmw assessments. Your propperty is located 1n Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street L1ggAttng Maintenanrce Districts Nos. 1 and 2 were fonts in 1979 and 1983, respectively, for the urpose of malntalning landscape and for the cost notioce youorecelvedLredoesirec~om end tanflncreeie 1col~leUct/velUY, Doftf34t37 peg year of 52.86 per month. ofpa proposed 9 75Sn increase by Lhe aCUCaa~ionga County MaUrcDiitrlct1s TheaCi~ is making every attempt to ensure that assessments charges as low as possible. Nater savinngg devices and water saving landscaping have been installed wherever poss161e. You also stated concerns regarding weed control on Henosa Avenue, tree trimming, street repair and street cleaning. The parkways on Henosa Avenue are not included 1n the Landscape Maintenance 0lstrict because thry are side yards to the homes located at the end of the cul de sac end an to be pplanted and malnUlned b9 those homeowners. The City does not begin eleening the sytreettys or trlswTny the trees within a tract unt11 it Y1s accepted as c lpate 7, 1993 ~W1~he Ctty Yardrhes beenanoipi if Mato 1r~icil du ebthisareafo~lsehed'uled maintenance. If you have arty further aauestlons or we can be of further assistance, please contact Lucinda Hackett aE 989-1862, extension 2310. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EN6INEERIN6 DIVISION d-ve N1111am J. O'Ne11 City Engineer NJO:dIw EDC10agre Mayor Dennis 1. Stout Councilmember Willlom J. Alexontler Moyor Pro~Tem Charles J, Buquet rl 41- _. ti Councilmember Drone Williams Jack lam, AIC R, Gfy Manager Counctlmember Rex Gutleuei 10500 Crvrc Canter Drive P08ox 807 RanCpo Cucamonga, CA 01 X49 19W)984~1851 fA%pi09)'J876d^^+J U E-~ w E-~ ~~ ~_ ~-r~~ ~-+~ ~y ~~ ~~ ~~ w z ~- o z ~~ r6~ o U O '~ U 0.!m. (Y~.. LGU W Cs. L7q O E~-+ C/4] V H 2 ~~ Qi ~7 Q--i Qi ~, ~~ ~-~ ~i ~~ z E}-- o z ~ p o ~ U O y z x z ~ 6p.., W U [s. Op O Z F V67 U 6 g ~~~ a ~~ c~z E--~ w ~~ r~ti ~~ ~~ ~~ f--a ti~ E_,.., ~~ w .~ z~ ~~ ag o~ ~Ao ~d~ ~f~C.U W G~ f~ ~jO... X E-r Ca/3 U ~ 6 ~ ~ John R. Shedlock 10089 Iran Momtein Court Alta Lama, Ca. 91737 4 May 1993 CITY RECEIVEp City Clerk OF RANCHO CUCAMOgGA City of Rancho Cucamonga C~CLEgN 10500 civic center Drive MAY 1 0 1993 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 7 Elr "~'S ~14j Dear Council Hembers, City of Rmcho Cucamonga I fully protest the proposed plm to increase our taxes Eor improvmeats of Street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals, street lights on local streets and traffic signals and improvements of perk+.eys, medico islmds, peaeoa. entry momvneats, equestzien trniva and 38.25 ec rea perk e. I am al reedy papiag 54300.00 par annum lv propertp taws. I em told that Chic figure is higher Um other properties in the Citp of Rmcho Cucrosoaga with almiler or larger properties. Furthermore, I have 6eea in cop borne since 1989 sad the Citp hee not seen f!t to lmdecape or malatnin their property by triming the [resc or clearing weeds on the west side of Raxmoaa avenue above and helot Iron Momtein Court. At variaua times of the peer, when the weeds alert growing, cop children, are left off by their school bus oa the west Bide of the street et Copps[ Momtein Court, they must Nen welt through the large tumDL weed bushes and growth along the street. It ie dmgeroue to walk on Rermoea avenue at this point, beceuae vehicle traffic generally [revel quite feet due to the downhill grade. There is always n three[ of Deing bitten by n rettleaaake, or to etum6ls and fell oa the rough rocky terrain (ao eidmrolta or walkways along the «est side o[ the •traetl. Ia addition, tba section of Renaose Avenue below Iron Momtein Court i• always developing pot holes. Repairs are periodicnllp made, but the repairs seem to only last e short while. Mp cars have taken a beating oa the Ded road. Lastly, our street bee nawz sewn a street clemer, propertp owners clew the ^C1 tp^ propertp and attests in front of their homes. Sincerely, John R• Q. ~J.L.QO.~~ Shedlock pp pp ~~~~ H E{{~~ ' K L1 :V ~ 11 May 13, 1993 C UC ~ MONG ~~ Brian C. Miller 12684 Coral Tree Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Miller Ne have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting 0lstricts. The City Council will take your letter into consideration at the Public hearing on May 19 and June I6, 1993, at 7:DD PN 1n the Ctty Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Nackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENOINEERING,O~IV^IS~ION ~ "P ~.c / N1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:,{ h M ~yor Den rnS L Slo ui ~ CounCilmem ber `Nllllam J Ale xand ar rA~y v ron r~,m~ Chnnes 1 Puoue! II ~ Counalmambar G~pne w~lhoms Jock 10 m, AICP C,ty Pdonpgef COUnComember Rex Gune!rP,t ~~ 10500 ~ ixiC CnntBr D~.ve P O Box 00~ ~ f~Oxq hO CnCOmO^9u~ fA 91149 ~ (Po9) 9881951 Fax ~,':Ip; aganaav C T V O F dITY OF RANCHO~UCAMCNGA CITY CLERK CITY CLERK MAY 101993 MAY G, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCgMONGp 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CULRMONGA, CA. ~ !) !C G". e2'i l~Ii3'~5 i.; 161 GEAR SIRS, WITH THIS LETTER I RM SUBMITTING MY FORNgL PROTESTS TO THREE TAX PROPOSALS RECENTLY MAILED TO MY RESIDENCE. THESE PROPOSRlS BEING CONSIDERED ARE FOR STREET LIGHT XAINTAINENCE RNO LRNDSCRPE IMPROVEMENTS- WITHIN THE TWO YEARS OF MV LIVING IN THE "VICTORIA" COMMUNITY I HAVE SEEN NO LESS THAN FIVE DIFFERENT PROPOSgLS TO INCREASE OUR TAX BgSE. THESE ARE TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. IN THIS OAY pN0 qGE, CITY, MUNICIPAL, ANO STATE AUTHORITIES MUST REALIZE THAT THE RESIDENTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE NEIGH80R!I0005 CRNNOT BEAR qLl THE BURDENS OF PROPOSED TRX INCREASES. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS MUST SE7 AN EXAMPLE OF "BELT - TIGHTENINfi", JUST q5 AlL OF THE WORKFORCE HAS BEEN SUBJECTED T0. WHILE SOME OF THE NATION'S JOB MARKET HAS SEEN SOME PROMISE OF REBOUND, CALIFORNIA LAGS BEHIND. MRNV OF HER EMPLOYED NRVE NAD TO ACCEPT PRYCUTS pN0 OTHER LOSSES OF BENEFITS. MANY HAVE SUf FERED THROUGH LAYOFFS ANO PLANT CLOSURES/REIOCATI0N5. POORLY THOUONT OUT PROGRAMS SUCH AS THE ONES WHICH YOU HAVE PROPOSED HAVE NO PLACE ON THE DOCKET AT TNIS POINT IN TIME- RESIDENTS OF "VICTORIA" AlflEAOY ARE BURDENED WITH SOME OF HEgVIEST TqX LOAD IN THE AREA. WE RESIDENTS ARE FRCEO WITH A DILEMMA, WE ARE PAYING MORTGAGES IN MANY CASES THAI ARE SIGNIFICANTLY OREgTER THAN THE RCTUAL VALUES OF THE NOME ITSEI F. THLS, IN CUNJUCTION WITH THE FACT THAT OUR TAXES ARE EVER INCREASING HAS REMOVED ANY DESIRABILITY TO RELOCATE FAMILIES INTO OUR CtlMMUNITY. WE CAN'T HAVE ANYMORE RECKLESS SPENDING SUCH HRS BEER SUGGESTED MERE TODAY. THE CITV HAS TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO ALL OF Z7'S RESIDENTS BY LIVING WITHIN ITS MEANS. IN OTHER WORDS THE WELL IS DRY. CONSERVE... SINCERLY; y~! N ORYAN C. ~LIIE'-Ri-- 1268~ CORM TREE RD. RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CA. 91739 T H E C ~ T Y O F R t1 N C K O May 17, 1993 C UC ~~ MONGl1 Mr. and Mrs. George Johnson 11068 Sh11ah Caurt Rancho Cucanronga, CA 91737 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Johnson: Ne have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment Por the Landscape and L1ghting D15tr1cts. The Ctty CouncTi Ni11 take your Letter into consideration at the public hearing on Maly 19 and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM 1n the C1ty Council Chaalbers, 10500 C1vit Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Nackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENG''i NppEE RIAANG OIVSSION ~-a, NillTae J. O'Ne11 City Engineer NJO:,~h Mgygr Den ni5l sic of CounCilmercP~er William J, Alexander "f ay0' Prn iom Cngrle5 J BUgUFf II }~ ;i r Councilmembef ~IOne Williams Jack iom, AIf. P, City Mnngger Counctlmember Rex Gutierrez I GSW Ci~~c Cenler errve P O ae, 907 Aa ncnn Coc omongo, CA tl1720 (WM) 9094951 ~Ax itlfMl OB ~~n X190 t ' ~> C~ C_i~:AlZ yj ~;~,~ /~~' /993 J ~ '. _ ~~- CL~'cIG~L~"~-L~:l Ey C~~1'll ~+.J®.¢QJl/Y/L:',tf ~ /~ -L cff~~l.~r(.(.;~;~ I~~ C~- [j ~,l S7%i:~ i /1~~1jjl/(~li.I ~ne~n'~yfASl.~ ~a~ ~ / //~~8 S/uf'r~/i/ C~ ~~~' l ,C~r~! c~z~ x%/73 ~ ..ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHOp CITY CLERK MAY 171993 IT151911UI 111 ill llai31413y6: T H E C I T V O F R t1 N C N O May 17, 1993 C U C H M O ~d G t1 Michael T. Chen 20240 Leadvrell Street Canoga Park, CA 91306-3215 Oear Mr. Chen: Ne have received your Letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council w111 take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on Myy 19 and June 16, 1993, at 1:00 PM 1n Lhe C1ty Council Chambers, 10500 C1v1c Center Dr1ve. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING OIYiSION dw Ni111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:~h Mayor Dennis L Stouf L , Counalmember William J. Alerantler r!ayor Pro (em Charles) 9uqueNl ~~_~ si~, Ccuncilmrmber Diane Williams Jack Larn. A~CP, Cily Manager ~~ CouncJmamber Rex GuliEUez 105W Civic Center Drive vp BOx 901 Rancho CUCamongo,CA 91219 (90919991851 FAF 9u:, 9+.]•.... May l 1, 1993 Michael T. Chm 202101.'adarJl SaeU Camga park, Ca 913063215 City Cleric City ~Itancho Copmonga 10300 Civic Cenlu t)rivt Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Dear Srr CG' ~_~tvn*~ I am the ptopeRy owner at 6130 Pamrama Ct., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701. [ save 0x notice regazdiag proposed mmmmt w my progeny for the ioytovemm6/maimmaoce dth attxt tights and traffic signals oa laal stteeb within the Catyn 1'la®cd Cott®tmiry. 7'his leaer is m let yw kmw thm I m prolMla~ aplot shove kv~. Plwe wnodc my ptopeu when determining whether m levy the proposed aosaal saae®ent w uq praperry. ILaok yaa very much) Sinaaely, MicYael T. Chen ~`~~.~ RECEltrrr CITY OF RANCHU `. ',^,e.gryG~ CITY Ci a~aY i s ~ss3 I7~R19110111112 ~~_ _._ '. T H E C I T V C F l R .~ N C K O C U C A M O N G ~1 May 18, 1993 Richard Thomas 6949 P1zzo11 Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Thomas: Ne have received your letter of protest 1n regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on May 19 and June 16, 1993, at 7;00 PM in the Ctty Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any yuestlons, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIYISION l~V~ .~,,.~N1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:,~h M1rayai Dennis l Stout Counalmember Wllllam J AlPxpnder •,tovrn oro m•r Chrnlps J Buque(II ~r1 p~, r~. Councllmemner Dlone Wilaoms Jac4 Lam, AIC P, C~rv IAanoger Counp~member Rex Gutierrez I OSp flimc f enter Gr:ve ~ P p ?Jx fi0x 9a nr,na Cucomo~ga. Cn 91179 19p9) 980-I B51 rnx '~4J; )H9 0: ~~ ,~~. ''F ~ P-- i ~, i ,~~ . N ~~ , • = ~L \~ v ~ T u x J I ~ ~ '~ L1 v :rte _ G 7 O w ~ vv a ~ u v ~ o d~ ~cJ. ~ '~ ~ 117 j r U 1 a ~s J~ a a a N N n' i 'r -~~ r~ ~.. ~~~-_ ~: ~._ s = - 1 ,' w _J N 1"~ N• ~- ~- G -~ s Jv l ~1 'd .3 v e ~ r 3 1 ? H E C I T V O F IZ A N C K O C U C~ M O N G~ May 16, 1993 William and Louise Runyan 10213 Heather Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737-4323 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Runyan: This is in response to your letter of May 4, 1993 regarding the increase in the amount of the assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A copy of the Annual Engineers Report which includes a map of the district area is enclosed. Plans showing the areas being maintained within the District are quite voluminous. We would be happy to pull the plans for you to examine at the Engineering 01v1sion counter. Our office hoarse are from 7:00 a .m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. A11 revenue collected through this assessment 1s used 1n the district area. As a matter of law, the revenue collected must be spent in the district in which it was collected. Only those parks located within this district boundary are maintained by the assessments collected within the district. Annual reports are prepared for all the Landscape and Lighting Districts within the City to determine the amount of ad,lusUaent required to balance the revenue and expenses for each district. There are factors beyond the City's control which result 1n increases to these assessments. The Increase to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 is partly attributable to a Droposed water rate increase of 9.75X by the Cucamonga County Water District. The total increase in this district is 519.74 per year or 51.65 per month. There is no increase in Park District 85 (PD-85). Please be aware the City 1s making every attempt to ensure thet assessment charges are as low as possible. The City has installed water saving devices and uses water savlny landscaping wherever possible. We are also tnvestlgattng other opportunities 1n an effort 1n keeping assessment costs down. "d ayor Gen me L Sfouf ., Councilmem6er WAbam J Alexander blow _, c,q h;r~ Chanel J Buauef II Cauncdmember Dione Wtlllams lack Lom. AIC. P. Cdy ldanager CouncilmamGe, Rex GW~errez %, II15C0 CiNq Cpnigr Dmp PO BOx 9W Rancho C~camonpo CA V1129 1o09~OH919$I FAF ~•i;0,~g7 pJ.'. WILLIAM AND LOUISE RUNYAN PAGE 2 MAY 18, 1993 If you have other questions regarding this matter, please contact Lucinda E. Hackett at 989-1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COrP1UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIY IS ION ~5'^"~. B'au ~-,~ William J. O'Ne11 City Engineer WJO:d1M Enclosu-es May 4, 1993 Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Divi sioc 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Ms. Hackett: Reference the proposed assessment announce meat dated April 21, 1993, we are requesting the following Snformation: 1. A map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. 2. pn accurate list of the parkways, median islands, paseos, entry monuments, end equestrian trails actually located within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. 3. Are all city-wide districts to be assessed fees for the listed parka" 4. Why would out maintenance district 6e responsible for maintaining items not located within our dletrict7 5. Is this proposed assessment ~uat one of s city-wide proposal to all dietrictal 6. Are we the first district affec tad? Are additional assessments planned? If so, when vo uld these occur? May 4, 1993 Page 'I vo Your written response vouid be appreciated by May 12, 1993, so that an informed response can be submitted prior to the first scheduled public Hearing of May 19, 1993. Sincerely, William & Louise Runyan 10213 Heather Street Alta Loma, CA 91737-4323 987-2704 (home) 394-3496 (work) PROPOSED PROCEEDINGS, OR THE ESTIIdATE OF T}L COST AND EXPENSE OF THE PROPOSED MAIIVIENANCE, OR THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMEN"1'; AND ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTER- ESTED MAY FILE A WRITTEN PROTrsT AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR TH`c SECOND HEARING REFERRED TO HEREIN. ~ : ' ``',w..: r_ %~ ~ + THE OWNER OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DLS'CRICf MAY MAII:A PROTEST TO THE FOLLOW89G "11'x' ~' ADDRESS: ~\~, CITY CLERK ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '' ~" '•""'-`- - ^'-'^'=-:. 10500 CHIC CENTER DRNE - `, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~-~~ TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, ALL PROTFSIS MUSP 8E RECEIVED AT OR PRIOR TO ' THE T8v1E SET FOR THE SECOND PUBLiC HEARING. A POSTMARK PRIOR TO SUCH DATE AND TIME '"" ~.~. -! . NTLL pjQT BE SUFFICIENT. - 1 ForaB infomtation relating m these proceedings, the hearing procedure, aid any and all matters av set mrtlt and mnfained N arty documents, Your attention is directed m the person designated below: . „ ,. LUCWDA E. HACKEFF, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1O5000Ml~CENTER DRNE C1IY OF RANCHO ~ p RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 CITY CLERK 'MONQA DATE: APRIL. 21, 1993. DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALffORMA MAY 18 1993 7R Y AO II 12123456 City o/ RanrEO Cueanonp U.A~P ~ P.o. ear 907 PAID RanfioCuramonga,G 9/729 trtrsat tb. 22 9trammpa.AWYmIa it CAR-RT SGFT ii RR90 N ICh AEL hG-CU IhA 10570 SILVEF SFIR Cl ALTA LOM A• GA SI7J7-2193 CCG ~ CMG ~.c ~ Q /'~1 ~Y ~'~ 1p"~ pp T ~~~~ H E1u~ C I T pY 1~~ O r ' K C1 1V ~ It O ~ U ~ !.1 1~1 O :V ~i .\ May 18, 1993 Michael Ng-Quinn 10570 Silver Spur Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737-2493 Dear Mr. N9-Quinn We have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Oistrlcts. The City Council wttl take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on May 19 and June 16, 1943, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Or1ve. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION +Gifuv.~PT d-r William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:,Ih Mayor Dennis L Slout Coon almember WAllam J, Alexander Moy qr Pr O~iem Chap ESJ Buqu et II y. ~, COVn atlmember Dione'N JIiamS JOGk ~,am, AIQ P. Cdy (~ia~agEr ~~~ DOUn(:1lmember nex GUherreL In5ntl Qvi«: Cen«e~Dnve vq BGx 801 Roncho CUCOmonga, CA 01129 1909)9g9~IB51 Fa. - - i H E C i i V O F R ~ NC KO C UC ~~ SONG ~~ May 19, 1993 Ms. Bonnie Robins P. 0. Box 475 Upland, CA 91785 Dear Ms. Robins: Ne have received your letter of protest 1n regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessakent for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. Per our conversation, enclosed 1s a copy of the Engineers Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a {Fp•ssop). The City Council rill take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on May 19, June 2, and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM to the City Council Chambers, 10500 C1v1c Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Luctnda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELL4"MENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIV[~ION N1111am J< O'Neil City Engineer uJO:,{ h Enclosure Moyer Dennrs l Stout Councilmember William J. Ale.ronoer M ayOr Prn-rem Ch Olles J auquet II ,-i i ~ COUOCtlmembel Diane WiIIlOmS Jock yam, AIC P, Gty Manager Councilmembel ReK Gutierrez ~~ I G.50G Civic Cen~nr Drive P O Boe 807 Ranpgo C„camonga. CA C1129 (G091 ~89~1851 fav %Cp+ Gq) 0:... DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1~ ,, ~.~ bir1Y 3r7 rpb~3 U MaY 5, 1 9 9 3 C1Ti'CF R?.yi.;'.C ry it r~r C ERTIFiED k 439 266 193 City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10900 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Proposed assessment for landscaping on Hyssop Drive TO WHOH IT HAY CONCERN: We wish to register our opposition to the proposed assessment. First, each property owner should care for that portion adjacent to their property, and should be able to do so less expensively with their normal weekly maintenance. . Secondly, any additional ices during these recessionary times add an unnecessary burdan on owners and developers. At a time when the City has hundreds of vacant buildings and is facing budgeCary concerns, the focus should be on attracting business and thereby tax revenues-everyone wins) Lastly, our opposition 15 based on the fact that despite our telephone request to your office, we were told that we could not obtain by fax or mail even a basic description of the proposed project, including the actual location. Sincerely, ~~!! ~-- '' C~e~ /C~ Bonnie Robins ~c: Lucinda E. Hackett, Engineering P.O. Box 475 Upland, CA 91785 (909) T H E C I T Y O F 12 ~~ N C H O C Ll C~ ~q O> G~ May 19, 1993 Christopher C. Wheeler 13932 Annandale Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91139-2185 Dear Mr. Wheeler: We have received your letter of pretest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for thx Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter iota consideration at the public hearing on May 19 and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM 1n the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. ST ncerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGIN~EE RBI NG DIVISION William a O'Neil City Eng~eer WJ O:jh Mayor Donors L Sfou1 Counctlmember Wllbom J. Alexander Mnvnr Pro~lem Chones 1. Bnryuet II >7 `-Lam'°°r"' S ))) Counrnimember Dione Wlpiams ;~s,x inn Alr a, p•y MOnoger Councllmombel RexGWrerrez 105 ,nrvic C:anrci pr~v~ ap 9or Nnl Ronc no CUCOTOnU0 CA 91920 19fA)9g9 rf351 FA%(90979896499 PROPOSED PROCEEDINGS, OR THE ESTIMATE OF THE COST AND EXPENSE CF THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE, OR THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT; AND ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTER- ESTED MAY FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE SECOM7 HEARING REFERRED TO HEREIN. THE OWNER OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT MAY MAIL A PROTEST TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: CTIY CLERK ~~~~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~d 10.5(10 CP/IC CENTER DRNE Y I R RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91719 C/n'Cf /SOHO ~ 199: a'CIN COCA TO BE CONSiDEAED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, ALL PROTESTS MUST BE RECEt~AA'{~R TO THE TIME SET FOR THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING. A POSTMARK PRIOR TO SUCH DATE ND TIME W9LL Lyf;'F.iIF. SUFFICIENT. For all information relating ro these proceedings, the hearing procedure, and any and all matters as set forth and contained in any documents, your attention is directed ro We person designated below: LUCINDA E. HACKETT, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DiViS10N 10500 CNIC CENTER DRNE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 DA 1E: APRIL 21, ]993. ~`!f ~ f ~~se L-t1 i £ [-/ L- Ci /~ / G/c' o U) ~~l' Go/Yli^~eJr L_Y ~,'n/Fq IP ( ~G~!r(L 7Z t-c_. S~.~t~-L o./i_ DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CL'eRK ~'/yO r"~~ FS ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /F%a/~~k'J STATE OF CALIFORNL4 ~~ Cf1P--/ J City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 gulPkoRate P.D. Boa g07 aGa Rancho Cucamonga,CA 97729 PAID Permh No. Z7 Cucamonaa Celilomis 1NN~ef 5-OIGiT 91739 FO1 CHRISTOPHER C YNEELER 17972 ANh ANCALE LN RCN CUCANONGAa CA 91739-E185 T H F. R f1 N C iI O May 25, 1993 C UCH MONO; Joel Ca scadden 9729 Sunfl ower Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Mr. Cascadden: We have received your letter of protest Tn regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter into consideration at the Dublic hearing on June 2 and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMONITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGTNEERI NG DIYISION ~~~~~~,~ Willia ~' O'Neil City En lneer WJO:Jh Mayor Uenois L Srnut J Counalmember William J. Alexantler Mayor nro-iom Charles J. Boaunt II ~ ~ ~~ CounciLnember Drone Wlllloms ,Iq'.k Oi r, p'C:P (;PV Meno qer COUnUlmember RB° Gu}iB rreZ In ii !q~i.,x C.•n'nrUm~~ FL Arx a01 Rencnn CUCOmonrao ~A 9V;9 i?q91 BAV 1951 ~ F4X f"+p9L 99 ~~hd99 C I T v O F 5/19/93 To xhom it may concern, The public Ss be Sng 1m~ndated Nith demands for additional taxes to pay for everything from landscaping to polioe and fire pro~eotlon. It Sa time t0,"Drax the line", an3 to atop asking for more taxes, Prioritize expend Stures and, PLEASE, no more nex taxes. hankyou, \ Jo/ 1 Casc adden ~g729 gunf loNer Alta Loma Ca, 91737 909-9800726 c T H E C I T V O F ~ ~~ N C I-I O C U C ~~ M O N G t1 May 26, 1993 Ms. Kathieen Graven 8535 Sandalwood Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Ms. Graven: We have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council wt11 take your letter into consideration at the public hearing on June 2 and ,tune 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chanters, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. 6lncerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION .~~~ j.~~ Wi111am O'Neil City Eng eer W.10: J h M ayu~ Uen nis L Steut Counailmember William J Alexantler M aver Pie-iem (a erl&SJ BVpUGrh ~+. ~ Ce~ln Cilmember Cliane WIIIIOm$ ,~r~,~~om a'~G a. r;,ry Mor~ger Counc~.mamber Rex Gutierrez ~~ rg5nq '; ,~, "cr~or un~g n O en. gip a~nc no Coromongo Cn of lpp wool V5P rBbl r.., ~ry~~p~~~ ~'CLE'A MAY E 41993 'c~ ~~~ „89,0_, c~ ~,.~ l./ ' ~~Q -~.~ / ~t! arm lllYti2,~7` C n~~~ /~~ri ~Xfi~ g? 1i7G2e~ ~l/7GLilCler~ 7~~ ~~re~~~~ F~jhz,,;]T,~r/p, G1,~~2 ~ ~Flr~i Y1 cc r~irt~~/~ ~ ~~ ~1 ~,~~ ~~~~ ~ ~G~ ~ ~~ rrCyt~~~ . [~ zly ~~c C~~zies- ,~ii~Q' c~ G/ `r~ ~n~ ~~iC~z`z~C ~~,~za Iti~o ~ ~~ G1/~ ~~r G m ~'~tr~~ /DUC'z` . `G'o ,'o~ f f~iiZr®'t~~~?~~ /~ ~v..~ ~~ jp 9~~ ~~itl 172 G lf~C~d~a~.e'10~tvlTZ~ ~ ~~~ ~ <'~cld ~~~~ Q ~ ex mJ /C'iulgit~.C. ~d~ ~ am~~ el LGmrC~' .e~lr~~/ z/~ f~a~~ sr~ ~h~ G~{~ `t/z<~~~li~ ~k/,~lvu~y llid~d~ fr S /r7'a wdr~ f ~~ .2~~r ~/ f~r.~/zan ~. ~ ~d ~ ~~ w a~ ~UC~~ ~~ ~?2r~ t n 7~v h~f~c~¢~ b,~ 12z~' ~,~JD l~f ~~z`l~ U P. 1 711 / /,~ 1' `~~~/ 9 1 MA ~C~~~ X35 ~'al C u(1z mo~w~a ~A q 17 3a T H E C I T V O F ' R 11 N C K O C U C t1 M O N G t1 May 26, 1993 Boyd C. Spencer 4921 N. Valley Road Greenville, CA 95947-9736 Dear Mr. Spencer: Me have received your letter of protest in regard to the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the Landscape and Lighting Districts. The City Council will take your letter Tnto consideration at the public hearing an June 2 and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 PM to the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lucinda Hackett, at 989- 1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMBNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION NilNil/~J 0~~ City Engineer NJO:,lh PAayo~ Dennis L Sfout Councilmember Wilhum J. Alexander ,~ OVO~ 0~0 iem Cho0e5 J BU gUe;.I i~r~~r, ~`, COUnCilmembef Diane WilhOms '~ar:~ Lan. AIC P. C+ry rdanoger Caunctlmember Rex Gutierrez '05n'1 Ov ~, (.nni9r D~rve P 0 Bov 80] Ronc ho Cucamonga. CA 91119 ~ X909) 9891851 FAx ~, 9i ,o „ .. AT THAT TIME THE LEGISLATNE BODY WILL CONSIDER AND FINALLI' DETERMINE WI-'.ETHER TO LEVY THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, AND TO HEAR ALL PROTESTS RELATING TO SAID PROPOSED PROCEEDINGS, OR THE ESTIMATE OF TY.E COS? AND EXPENSE OF THE PROPOSED MAINFENANCE, OR THE PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, .4ND ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTER- ESTED 97AY FILE A WRIFCEN PROTEST AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE SECOND HEARING REFERRED TO HEREIN. THE OW NER OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTWCT MAY MAIL A PROTEST TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: ~~~ CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1Q500 CNIC CENTER DRNE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91719 TO HE CONSIDERED BX THE LEGISLATNE BODY, ALL PROTESTS MUST BE RECENED AT OR PRIOR TO THE TIME SEF FOR TI-~ SECOND PUBLIC HEARILdG. A POSTMARK PRIOR TO SUCH DATc' AND TIME vrtLL NOT BE SL':'.^.CIENT. --. .._ - .. ... - .._ *_ BDYD C SPENCER /~\t-LF, °' 4921 N VALLEY RD I~ ~ c' F ~ GR EENVILLE CA 95947 r pM ~ ALV~tA1' Forall information relatingto these proceedings, the hearingproced a apyytq~y all ma e~a3~tforlhirld contained in any documents, your attention is directed to the person low: J L 1 P /C/ ~ LUCMDA E. HACKETT, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER CCCC//// CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA ENGiNEER1NC DIVISION 10.500 CNIC CENTER DRNE RANCHO CUCAMONGA; G:A 91729 DATE: APRIL 21, 1993. A J. A S, CLERK OF RA HO CUCAMONCA, E OF CA IFORNIA ~,~ u-r~N TD ; - ---- -- City of Rancho Cucamonga Bulk Rab P.O. Hof 607 N.S. Paataq~ Ranch Cu<amonga,CA 91739 PA{D "~ ~_ Parmil Na. 13 ti't'-'W ~¢,~~~y..._~~~~~y~Cueun_opnW. CalilorW] ~ q ~ ~ rte, ~ .~-~' ~~d~~F. _ ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~ ~.,.,%~ ~,*->~ /C~ ~~ 1 ' _" r"'- r ~"`~,~V O /wt_ C~ C7a"u~-'~ ~~`°.~`y2teJ) ~"'Y ~Cl9w~~ {+++ +++• NIXED $7ATES -t"/y`a ~d ~7YIL~ 80Y0 C SP EhtEF R06 0923 N Vq LLEY RD G/R/E/~E'N~y f/L/CEr CA ggyg7_9736 7 H E C I T y O F ~n~vcHO cL1c~~:~oNCJn May 25, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. A1-ChalatT 13986 San Dimas Lane Etiwanda, CA 91739 Dear Mr, and Mrs. A1-Chalati: Ne have received your letter in protest of the proposed 1993/94 assessment for the LanASCape and Lighting Districts and will forward it to City Council for their consideration at the public hearings on June 2 and June 16, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. to the Ctty Council Chanmber, 10500 Civic Center Drive. Please be aware that this 1s not a new assessment. The current assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 is 5305.43. IL is proposed the rate be increased to 5307.05, an Increase of f1.62 per year. Ne would like to take this opportunity to address your concerns regarding the time of day the landscape is watered. The landscape 1s noramlly watered between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. Sunday through Thursday. Nhen the sprinklers are being tested or areas have been 9~ewly planted or seeded, the sprinklers will be on during the daytime hours for short periods of time. Ne appreciate your concern and thank you for calling these items to our attention. In answer to your questions, regarding parks and the green belts located 1n your areas, there are plans for a communll<y park to be constructed north of Summit Avenue, east of East Avenue. The green belt areas are to be used for walking and bicycling. Benches were not lnctuded for this reason. If you have arty additional questions or if we can assist further, please contact Lucinda Hackett at 989-1862, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~oe~o N1111am O'Neil City Engineer NJO:dIw Mayor Dennis l Stquf COUncJmrmber Williom J. Alexontler Mayor Proem C~arlesJ euquet !! ~r ~ Counoimember Drone Willinms vgc,k Lnm. AiCP CAy Monoger Councdmembor Rex Gutierrez !q~'Y74wic i;nnr~~Urrve ~O Bax 909 Roncno Cucomonga. CA Sr 97v (909r B89~IB51 Ppv .~ CC ~ [.g~wc4(/ 13956 SAN DIMAS LANE ETWANDA,CR 91739 MAV 11,1993 DEBRA J. ADAMS CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91729 DEAR MS. ADAMS; WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT TAXES OF THE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT KNOWN AND DESIGNRTED AS "LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT k7 LET IT BE KNOWN AND RECORDED THAT WE ARE TOTALLY AGAINST ANV MORE TAXES IN THIS AREA. OUR HOUSES HAVE DEPRECIATED TREMENDDUSLV,VET WE ARE STILL PAVING ABOVE AND BEYOND OUR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES. ANV MORE TAXES AND WE WOULD BE TAXED OUT OF OUR HOMES . IT WOULD BE OF MUTUAL INTEREST TO RE-EVALUATE THE FUNDS THAT ARE BEING USED TOWARD THE LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE AND SEE THEY ARE PROPERLY MANAGED. ON NUMEROUS ixCASIONS,THE RESIDENTS IN THE "DISTRICT" NAVE NOTICED THAT THE SPRINKLERS FOR THE SAID LANDSCAPE HAVE BEEN TURNED ON MAD-DAY, 11-1 P.M,THE MDST CDSTLV AND LEAST EFFECTIVE TIME OF THE DRY. THE PLANTS USED IN THE LANDSCAPING ARE ALSO VERY LOW MAINTENANCE,NOT REOUIRSNG AS MUCH ATTENTION AS PERHAPS OTHER TYPES. 50 WHERE ARE THE FUNDS GOING ? WE DO NOT HAVE A PARK FOR OUR CHILDREN. WE DO HAVE A SO-CALLED GREEN BELT (WITH MORE DIRT THAN GRASS OR PLANT5I, NO BENCHES TO SIT ON IF PEOPLE WOULD L.I KE TO USE IT ? PERHAPS IT IS TIME TO STAR TO RE-EVALUATE SALARIES OF TOP MANgBEMENT POSITIONS. MOST RESIDENTS ARE MIDDLE CLASS WITH CHILDREN ATTEMPTING TO KEEP THEIR HEADS ABOVE WATER, VET THEY ARE SOME MEMBER OF THE CITY STAFF THAT MAKE OVER ! 100,000 A YEAR, WHV SHOULD THERE BE SUCH DISCREPANCY ? tHE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N 7 HA5 BEEN TAXED ENOUGH , WE IMPLORE YOU TO FIND Al7ERNATIVE INNOVATIVE MERNS OTHER THAN TAXATION TO ACHIEVE YOUR GOALS. RECEIVED SINCERELY YOURS ~iIY OF RANCRO CUCAMONG^ / CITY CLERK MAY 171993 AND AL-CHALATI i7'u~'/'lUi i.l 11 :.i 31nj516i May 27, 1993 John W. Bright 7485 Sierra Linda Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Bright: Your letter of pprotest for the proposed increase in assessments for Landscape and Lighting of stricts has been forwarded to City Council for their consideration. I would like to take this oppnrtuni ty to address some of the concerns mentioned in your letter. Please he aware that these are not new districts. Landscape Maintenance 9istrict dlo. ~. and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 were Formed in 1984 and Street Light Maintenance District No. was formed in 1983. The assessment notices you received recommends an annual increase in Landscaped Maintenance District No. 4 of $4.26 from $248.24 to 5252.50, in Street Light Ma%ntena me District No. 4 of $1.24 from $27.72 to 42P,.96, and in Street Ligght Maintenance No. 1 of $3.96 from $13.81 to 511.77 which amounts to an overall annu at increase of $9.46 or 40.79 per month. The revenue col? ected from these assessments is not used for the construe tf on of improvements. It is used to maintain the existing tandscaping, street lights, end traffic siynal s. Also, improvements to vacant land are not constructed by the City. The developer/owner of the vacant land r. enstruc is the improvements. After the improvements are accepted by City Council they are maintained by the District. In addition, please know the City is making every attempt to ensure assessments charges are as low as possible. Water Savings devices are being installed wherever possible and '.va ter saving tandscaping is being used. 'Ae hope this informatf on addresses your concerns. If yeu have any additional puestions, or if we can assist you further, of ea se contact Lucinda Nackett at 989-1862, extension 2340, Sincerely, COMA"UN ITY OEVELOPKENT DEPARTMENT ENGINES RI"!f, DIVISION ~ i ~. '.dill tam J. O'Neil City Engineer 'dJ 0: dl w ~`~~~ ~«~ ~OllrN ~. /3RI4Ni ~ ~, y485 SIERRA. L1~1'DA CT. aecewe~ RAh'CNO CUCArON4A, CA. 9!730 '' ~ ~ OF RgNCHO CUCAMON(;' ' CITY CLF:=,~ %A'y lz, lOP3 PnAY 17 1393 CiTy C9Ud~iL ;i13ER5 ., a i.l' it RAhCNO CUCArO,I'GA.CA. -- "' SU3~ECT:RROrOSEr7 LEVIES TO RRORE;27 7fiX~5 DEAR COUNCIL i;E~YQERS; AS A SE,4IOR CI7i BEN ArVD REST DE,V7 OF OVER FOUR YEARS, l OU,9EC7 70 7NE I ROROSED ASS~SSIiEd'TS Ah'D FIND IT BORDERIrVG ON 7!iE OBSCEIJE 70 ADD A,Y ADDi7i21'AL LOAD ON 7NE FIXED INCOME C171ZENS OF 7/lIS CITy.'/E N~9VE 3EEN PA;'IN4 FOR E;(1571h'~ P1RIh'TENAh'CE AND COh'STRUC7IOii IN OUR Nf_14Nr30RllOOD SINCE mOVIh'4 HERE Ah'D FIrVD IT ImROSSi6LE 70 JYDERS7Ah'D !U!ly ~E SNOULD lAy FOR If7RROVFJ7EN7 OF EIlrRiy LAND AND Uh'DEVE~O9ED AREAS OF TERRA ViSTA,wNEN INE RRORERiU TAXES SNOULD QE ~AiD °y ~EOiLE r~0'/IrY~ Ir1'%D %NESE rl'Efi !)EVELO%mEN7S,!!!! W,HE,ti !/E PURCl1ASED OUR N0~1E IrV ~ANUARy 1989 7NE FORmE7 O~~VER VIAS iA91NF; AROU,VD Sl,iGO. taxc..a d4~t€R !VE lURCNASED IT 7NE TAX ROSE i0 51.-roo. ~Ih'D RECE,V7LP !/AS A4AIrV 'RAISED TO OVER sz, loo.!! NO!/ y0U !/1~Ni i0 ADU Ah'07NF.;~ 5900. ITV ASSfrSSi4E~VlS 70 TNAT PoAk1~V4 A iOIA! OF O'JER 52.400.!!!! A7 7NE SAl7E 71r~E ALL U71LIiif~ NAVE RiSE,Y OVER i00',~ A,tD Ih' SOi1E CASES OVER zoo o. 6/NE^E ICU 7/lE !UOR!.D DO 'JOU TNINK FIXF_D INCOrnE PEORLE ARE l0 FIND THIS EXTRA ,flONEy OWNER 7NAN CUTTING FOOD,NEALiN CARE,I,VSURANCE, CLGTNI,VG ETC.?%?????? OUR LIFE SAVIN45 uErV7 LV70 OUR NONE :VI7/l iI/E EXREC7ATi0N OF LIVING O(/i OUR LIFE IN INE CI79 OF OUR CNOiCE S%1i,4 A TiGIl7l3UD~ET 7NA7 ELI1GIrVATES ANy SO CALLED LUXU21E5,40D NEl_R 7NE FIXED INCOrrE CITZ[ENS U/NO NAVE lUORKED AL! 7NEIR LIVES AND ARE STRU«lih'C, 9!!S7 TO ~tlAKE BASIC NEEDS. FEDERAL 40VERrV/1EN7 YON TALKS ABOUT TAXIrY'4 SOCIAL SECURmTy Ah'D GASOLINE 70 ADD Ah'OTNER 7/fOR,M1' i0 LOCAL RRORLEl1S. i~V BE_,4ALF OF Sf_~ti1GRS.RLEASE RECONSIDER 7NiS 7NREEFORLD iA:( BURDEN ArVD 1-irVD OilIER 4V1yS 70 CUT VIIII"l1IN CZ79 40VE^rUr7ErVT. 7!lA,VKih'1~ 9(lU FOR 'JOUR CGd'SIDERAiiOh'.i REIiAiN; JER') TRUL9 90/IRS: ~. J „~'90NN '~l, sRi4ili F,...1LY T H E C ~ ~ N C K O June 1, 1993 Jayne Dam 6953 La Paz Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Ms. Dam: T V O F C U C t1 S O N G ~ This letter is in response to your letter of May 21, 1993 regarding the proposed increased assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Please be aware that this is not a new assessment. It was formed in November of 1979. Currently, the annual assessment for this district is 572.47. It is proposed the rate be increased to 592.21 for fiscal year 93/94. This is an increase of 519.74 per year or 51.65 per month. A portion of this amount, E2.70, is the result of a proposed increase to water rates by the Cucamonga County Water District. The remainder of the cost is a result of additional areas added to the district over the last year. As you mentioned, this district includes several C1fy parks that are used by people living outside the district. However, other City yarks, for example, these located within the Terra Vista and the Victoria Communities are mainta ineA with assessments from Landscape Maintenance DTstricts 2 and 4. Rate increases have aiso been recommended for these districts. Heritage and Red Hill Parks are maintained with assessments from Park District 85. To give you some idea of the areas contributing to these districts, maps for landscaping Maintenance Districts 1, 2, and 4 and PO 85 are enclosed. The Sports Complex is not maintained by any of the Districts. The City receives fifty percent of the Parking fees collected at the Sports Compt ex and those are for the maintenance of that facility. Please know the City is veryy concerned with keeping the maintenance district rates as low as possible. We have installed various water saving features to reduce cost and use water saving planting wherever possible. We will continue these efforts in the future. Your letter will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at the public hearings on June 2 and June 16, 1993 at 7:00 P.M, in the City Council Chamber, 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have questions, please contact Lucinda Hackett, at (909) 989-1662, extension 2340. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEE/RING DIVISION /~l ~i~ ' l2~-E C~ Willia J~. O'Neil CT ty En Weer WJO:diw Enclosures Mayor Dennis L. Sfouf Mayor Prn-fern Cnnnes 1. auai,et II ~ lei _ ~ ack Inm, MCP, Coy Mcnagor ~- ~ _~ C oun climert•,be~ Wtll:am J. Moxande~ CoUnrtlmember Diu ne WIIIInT9 COVn CI1+1an1UOl Pvw Gutanoi Ch0ir ~.~, pnlnr Drron "O nnx 90J Rn~cIro COCI]RO^nn qA 'J1 J:v !9n'JI Oa9 ig51 FA%rye4i 9A 10499 C~ ~~ /Ll RECEIVED CG (J ~'aY OF RANCHO CUCAMON May 21, 1993 CITY CLERK MAY 2 51993 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 i s ~ v ~ to i n I tzl 11213 ~ 415161 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Sir: Subject: Intent to Assess Annual levy for landscape Maintenance District 1 I object to the proposed assessment of 592.21 per single family/multi-family unit. i do not think it is fair to charge this additional tax et all and why single out only Maintenance District No. 17 Surely, the city doesn't think that people living in a particular geographic area in the city only use certain parks. The parks, neighborhood center, etc are for everyone's use. Surely the city must be getting additional money from the season parking fees and ~ , ./ S2 parking fee charged at the Quakes Epicenter stadium. I feel S2 is a lot of ~,.`~(o•~"/" money to just park on a dirt lot but we pay this money because we figure the I" ~~L.J" money is going to the city. Q.~ I strongly feel that the city of Rancho Cucamonga is going to cause people and businesses to move out of this city if they continue to impose additional taxes such as this proposed assessment. The city recently passed the utility tax, we have an entertainment tax and now Proposition U is on the June 8th ballatl The citizens of this city are definitely getting the message that the city needs more money to pay its bills but we just don't have the additional income. Sincerely, /~.L ~~~~I-" Jayne Dam 6953 La Paz Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 as a - ~s/ -s/ "Coe- /.A3o ~/d. y ~, ~ i S !- U a' P ~ r,, t;iii yr ^cnrri:nai l.UI.AMVPIVA MEMORANDiJM DATE: June 2, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: RE$UEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION I have been informed by our City Attorney that an executive session is needed at the conclusion of the City Council meeting to discuss pending litigation (Settlement of the Lawson case). Please adjourn the City Councff meeting to Executive Session. JBF/dja JAMES L. MAgXM VN9Eq ONE CIVIL CEn iEq CiRG IC ANOR[W V. AgCt PO. BOII 159 gALPH O. HrCry 50 BRC A. CALIE OG NIA 828221058 JECCR [v RING I)IMI 9B O~O D01 D. CP11G FO% TELE PXJNC { , ] 10168 -J BSI WILLIAM P. CVgL M AHSNA G.SLOV J V LIA A. CEMP DIIJ EOOTNI LL BOVLE VA RO PAMELA P, XING SJIiE 200 N [glgEgtO E 9 CHO CVCAM ONGA. GA LI, OnN IA 911]0 BONNI[ 9AIiEY I /9091 DB 0~2PX2 iCLEPHOHE I X19091 JBI-O 21B ~N qE PLY PLEASE REPCR TO. ebo Cucamonga /EGLL~/M¢W, I7.~G: !l(<69LJO)L' ~' 4)tlj~ AN ~ ((((/////~ ,.//// p~L,G V O F YN SXI V')S/X leX "-w_'1J EY 0 AS PAN iONFS June 1, 1993 Raa Honorable Dennis Stout Mayo: of City of Rancho Cucamonga Members of City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Post office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730-807 Re: CITY OF RANCRO COCAMONOA va. LAIISON, at al., Dear Mayor Stout and Members of Ciiy Council: Mr. S Mrs. Kurt Lawson are the owners of the lot to the north of the Morrows, who in conjunction with the Morrows, blocked the access to a feeder trail with gates and fences. The lawsuit with the Morrows was resolved pursuant to a Stipulated Judgment, in favor of the City, and an Agreement that the trail will be in compliance with the Development Code no later than November 30, 1993. The lawsuit against the Lawsons for a Violation of the Development Code and Abatement of a Public Nuisance was filed in April of this year, contemporaneous with the resolution of the Morrow matter. The Lawsons are presently in eacrow concerning the sale of their home. They do not wish to get involved in litigation. They have agreed to sign the enclosed Stipulated Judgment, (Exhibit "A"), so that it can be recorded before the close of escrow on June 7, 1993. As well, they have agreed to bring their property into compliance, prior to the close of escrow, with the exception of erecting a trail fence along the interior perimeter of the trail. The new owners would like to erect the trail fence in accordance with their tastes and interests. The Lawsons have allotted the new owners Honorable Dennis Stout Members of City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 1, 1993 Page Two $5,000.00 towards the construction of said Pence. The new owners have agreed to sign the enclosed Agreement, Exhibit "B" providing for the erection of the fence within 90-days of the transfer of title to Lot 4. The Lawsons have been working with Mr. Brad Buller so as to take all necessary steps to bring the property into compliance. They have been very cooperative and are motivated to resolve the issue forthwith. I would appreciate authorization from the Council to resolve this lawsuit consistent with the enclosed documents. While time is limited, there should be no problem having the documents executed, and the Stipulated Judgment recorded before June 7, 1993. Thank you very mucF~ r your cooperation. I i SS cerely, PAMELA KIN \ Px/ymj JJJ Enclosure ]I~ MARxM11N, ARCaYNBxI, HANBON i xING PAMELA xINO '1 9133 Foothill Blvd., Suita 200 Rancho COCaaonga, CA 91730 $ I (909) 900-2744 411Attornaye for Plaintiff 5 6 7 $ IN TH8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE eTATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND POA TH8 CODNTY OP BAN BERNAADINO 10 ]] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, ]2 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 MR. & MRS. KURT LAWSON, 15 Husband and Wife, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 76 CASE NO. RCV 02211 PROP08ED BTIPtlLATED JODOMENT Defendants. ; 17 21 Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the CITY OF RANCHO i CUCAMONGA on the Complaint, and against defendants, MR- & MRS. KURT LAWSON. ~ IT IS FUP.THER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. Pursuant to conditions of approval for Tract 10046, an easement for equestrian trail purposes was created over that portion of defendants property (Lot 4) designated for said purposes on Tract Map 10046; 2. MR. 6 MRS. KURT LAWSON, are hereby enjoined from engaging in or performing any and all acts which may interfere with the free use of the equestrian trail easement over that portion of the 1 ~~(~..A]~qT' 6R ~ 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1~ 11 MR. KURT LAWSON 15IIMRS. KURT LAWSON 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 defendants property designated for said .purposes on Tract Map 10046; and 3. The within order constitutes a final determination of the rights of the parties as between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and MR. & MRS. KURT LAWSON, in the above-entitled cause. Dated: i JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT HONORABLE DENNIS L. STOUT MAYOR OF THE CITY OF .2ANCHO CUCAMONGA z 71 O R E E M E E T Tn recognition of the following: 1. Pursuant to conditions of approval for Tract 10046, an easement for equestrian trail purposes was created over that portion of Lot 4 designated for said purposes on Tract Map No. 10046; 2. The Develooment Code of th City of Rang ctcamonca provisiohe require that all feeder trails be unencumbered by obstructions to the free use of the trail system; and ~. The Development Code further requires that a trail fence, acceptable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, be maintained along the interior perimeter of the trail. do hereby agree to erect a trail fence, acceptable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, along the interior perimeter of Lot 4 within ninety (90) days of the transfer of Title to Lot 4, in favor of the undersigned. Signed: Date Name ~~YG.d~~1~' u ~ h