Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/01/20 - Agenda Packet PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 1 All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submttt)ng these itema Is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuestlay prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Ot}ice receives all such items. A• CALL TO ORDER 1. Rdl Coll: Raquel-, Ak+xarxler_,Stout_ W9Irnu _, and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place far the general public to addross the City Council. Slate law prohibits the City Council from atldresaing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. TAe City Council may receive testimony end set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments era to be limited to Rve minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calentlar Items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discuealon. Any Hem may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discusalon. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/23/92, 12/30/92 and 1 1/6/93. and Payroll ending 12/17/92 and 12/30/92. for the total amount of 5910,705.43. 2. Approval to receive and fie current Investment Schedule as of 9 December 31, 1992. 3. Approvol to adopt a Resolution in support of locating a 13 Department of Defense Accounting Center at the sMe of Nodon Alr Force Bose in San Bernardino County. PAGE City Council Agenda January 2B, 1993 2 RESOLUTION NO.93-004 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CtiV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA. SUPPORTING LOCATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACCOUNTING CENTER AT THE SITE OF NORTON AIR FORCE BASE IN SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 4. Approval of Founders Day Parole Evaluation and Mod'rficotion 15 RBVieW PfOCe55. 5. Approval to display the Park ontl Recreation Commission's 2ntl 2fi Place Trophy from the Annual Founder's Day Parade in the showcase south of the Council Chambers as recommended by the Pork and Recreation Commission. 6. Approval to destroy records and documents which ore no longer 27 required as provided under Government Code Section 34J90. RESOLUTION NO.93-OD5 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CfIV COUNCIL OF THE CffV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORILNG THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER RE9UIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34(7',0 1. Approval to declare as surpWS two G.E, hondi-talkie radios and 35 chargers, ontl to donate some to the Inland Empire West Chapter of the American Retl Cross. 8. Approval to extend Comcast Coble T.V.'s franchise. 36 RESOLUTION NO. 91-012K 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIiV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T, V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9. Approval of request by Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of 38 Commerce to wolve City fees in conjunction with the annual Business and Community Expo. 10. Approval of revisions updating the existing San Bernardino County 39 permtt for the Mid-Volley SanRary LOnaflll. PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 3 RESOLUTION NO.93-006 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CfTY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISIONS UPDATING THE EXISTING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PERMIT FOR THE MID-VALLEY SANITARY LANDFILL 11. Approval to execute a Reimbursement Agreement (CO 93-001) 42 wRh certoin property owners in South ETiwanda to cover consuttont costs associated with a proposed assessment tlisirict as requestetl by property owners. 12. Approval to execute Settlemen} Agreement (CO 93-002) with 4q County of Son Bernardino regarding Municipal Court Fines. RESOLUTION N0.93-007 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THE COUNN CF SAN BERNARDINO. THE TREASURER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNN, AND THE AUDITOR OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 13. Approval to execute Professional Service P.greements with 54 Fieldmon, Rolapp & Associates (CO 93-003), Willtlan (CO 93-004), and Brown. Divan & Henischke (CO 93-00.5) in relation to a request by property owners in South Etiwontla to form an assessment district. 14. Approval to award and execute the agreement (CO 93-006) for 56 the maintenance contract for General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Parks and Landscape sites for Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, of Irwindale. California, for the amount of 559,410.00, to be funded by the General Funa ontl Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Account Numbers O1-4647-6028 and 404130-6028, respectivery. 15. Approval to award antl authorization for execution of contract 60 (CO 93-007) for Sierra Madre Avenue street Improvs,nenis from Ninth Street to Chatfey Alley, a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program 100% fetlerolly funtled improvement project, to Eastland Construction, Incorporated for the amount of S98.762.00 (S89,783.70 plus 10%contingency). PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1893 q T6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 68 88-18, located on the east side of Hwen Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Diversified Properties. RESOLUTION N0.93-008 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CffV COUNCIL OF THE CffV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 88-18 17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 71 Tract 13566-3located on the Southwest comer of SummA Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue, submitted by Century American. RESOLIliION N0.93-009 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE CTIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPfiOVEMEM SECURIIV FOR TRACT 135663 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension tar 74 Tract 13717 located on the Northeast comer of Church Street and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION N0.93-010 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CTIV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13717 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Ertension for the 77 Church Street Improvements, located Uetween Elm Avenue West and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION N0.93011 79 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMEM SECURITY FOR THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 5 ~. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for gp Tracts 14379 and 14380 located on the Northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street, submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Inc. RESOLUTION N0.93-012 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CfiV COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURTTV FOR TRACTS 14379 AND 14380 21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 84 Security antl Ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, for Cond'Aional Use Pertnf19618, located on the west side of Santa Antta Avenue North of 4th Street, submitted by Mortin J. Jaska, Incorporatetl. RESOLUTION N0.93-013 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CRV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9018 RESOLUTION N0.93-014 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cf1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 36 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT90.18 22. Approval of Mop. execution of Improvement Agreement, 89 Improvement Security and Ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Sireei Lighting Maintenonce District Nos. 1 and 2 for Traci 13759 located on the west side of Haven Avenue. north of the Southern Pocific Railroad. submitted by Fu Mai Limited Portnership. PAGE City Cauncil Agenda u-rCJ-, January 20, 1993 I Q`~C I 6 RESOLU110N N0.93-015 91 A RESOLUTON OFTHE CIiV COUNCIL OF THE Cf1V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 13759, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLIfiION N0.93-016 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND2FOR TRACT 13759 ?3. Approval to accept Hellman Avenue Street Improvements into 96 the mainigined street system, and retludion of the Pertortnance Bond from S759A85 to S75.900 fa Tract 14192-1. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Streets) S759.OB500 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Bond (Streets) S 75,9LD.127 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have hed public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one lime without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No items submitted. F ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or postetl as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 7 1. CONSIDERATION OF IANDMARK D SI +NATION -0 -Approval of 98 an application to designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard. Rancho Cucamonga, as an Historic Landmark -APN: 1100-061-02. (Continued ham December 16, 1992) CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF gg ~MOLITION REQUEST FOR TH ARSON FI IN TATION AND ARA lA POT NTIA O A oNDMARK STAi ANDA^ARK ^ND NATIONAL REGISTER ELI IB Sm I IRE] - A request to demolish a portion of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage. located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga -APN: 1100-061-02, fie Historic Preservation Commission recommends the preparation of a focussed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in order to besT assess the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that could be considered include the Issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. (COMinued Irom December 16, 1992) RESOLUTION N0.92-267 17g A RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE. LOCATED AT 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1100-061-02 2. FNVIRONA' NTA ACS CCM fdT AND ONDITIONA lIS p rzMR 9 18 - SMITHS ~ An appeal of the Planing Commission's decision 182 denying the development of a commercial shopping center consisting of a 75,000 square foot grocery store. Two satellite buildings of 3.500 square feet each, and adrive-Thru pad of 4.800 square feet on 10.6 acres of land in the Commun4y Commercial District (Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APN: 207-102-03, 5.8, 15, 20, 21, and 49. Associated with this project is Tree Removal PennR 92-17., RESOLUTION N0.93017 267 A RESOLUTION OF THE Cf1Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-18, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER CONSISTING OF A 75,000 59UARE FOOT GROCERY STORE, 1'WO SATELLITE BUILDINGS OF 3.500 SQUARE FEET EACH, AND ADRIVE-THRU PAD OF 9.800 SQUARE FEET ON PAGE City Council Agenda L-uC.~ January 20, 1993 8 10.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE f-0OTHIU. BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-102-03, 5, B, 15, 20.21. AND 49 3. FNVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14116 - 270 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a residential suUdivision of 19 single family lots on 4.09 ocres of land in the Low Medium Residentiol District (4-8 dwelling Units per acre), located South of Highland Avenue, west of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 107667- 03. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 91-28. RESOLMON N0.93-018 308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRY COUNCIL Of THE CfTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 14116, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 19 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 4.09 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENFIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWEWNG UNfTS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUfH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 107661-03 G. PU9LIC HEARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair wlli open iha meeting to receive public testimony. 1. R -OMM NDATION TO cTAB ISF~SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON 310 KENVON WAY FROM MILLIXEN AVENUE TO VICTORLA PARK LANE: A SPEED LIMB OF QS MPH ON TERRA VISTA PARKWAY FROM CHjJj;CH SrREET i0 MILI_IKEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM HAVEN IO MILLIKEN AVENLIE: AND A SPEED I IMIT OF 45 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENLIE FROM SUMMIT AVENLIE TO ?4TH STREET PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 9 ORDINANCE N0.505 (fnY reading) 312 AN ORDINANCE OF THE Cif V COUNCIL OF THE C11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS 2. CONSIDERATION OFD OPM M RP^EW -1 1 - DA\^S -Appeal 322 of Planning Commission's decision to require a Community Trail in conjunction with the construction of a single family house totaling 7,d(10 square feet on 16.6 acres of land In the Open Space Distrk;t antl Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre). basted at 9400 Almond Street - APN: 1051-491-01. H. CITY MANA .oa~c cTeaa nFOnarc The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. UPDATE C)N STA SID r pROPOCd. S (ORAL REPORT) I. O rN I R rcruccc The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. J_ IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMC FOR N XT M ETIN This Is the time for City Council to identify the items lhey wish to discuss at the next meeting. These flame will not be discussed of this meeting, only Identified for the nett meeting. PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1993 1 0 K. COMM INIf:ATI(1NC r-Qnu THE pllnl l(` This is the 41me and plane for the general public to address the City Council. State lew prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council mey receive testimony and sel the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be Ilmited to five minutes per Individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS. I, Debra J. Adams, Ciry Clerk of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certity that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 14, 7993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 70500 Civic Center Drive. 0 :N Ja Vv O. SS i •S• ~S~ •v~ iii •ai o o rrNON~POP.NONNnooo.,oNONPmN mr ~rfopnmgoNmorm~ o PNmoNnaoP..n_~NOOmne.ommPP om PmmmNrmpo_mp.pN n N N ormo.Nme~mmPPnmrvPr.Pmm.P.r <m mn•nN•mnPmamnrvN N ~ M•N - a~a NNNNn rVi =nnnnnnrnnrnn'.I.n rnnnnnnnnnnnMnnwnnnnnnMnnnnnnnnnnFnF 1 I > • m I m 2N .. m r W iu no°w` i•.°.r O VLLN PS NNOm ONr ~rJ fp f isms f m°e~o aim Yrm i= .`.°o" mm i~ ILL OSmYt~J Z Vr YZOmV3 O JJJf i~2u LOf n OiV 1 fiG Nlu p OVwN~P •\ OZNSp 2V rl u Oif N221-w u wi22J fTSNwJmSn rO\ nSJ O> 63Ww wOf fiw V6pTVriNSJG O Yrv 61 >ZN rSN wZJ 61~=rOm U _ _mn_f_ ~ii __ _ _ V w w J V F JO m J iJf NJi~SSLL LLii LLU mVnJ • ZJ w rOJ~ woOr_SSZLL2Y >„ a2~J LLLLa•Sf VV>Rlr wONrtsaWf a • i 6wf aROnr,-OUiNwlpi NN>JJ N6 Z> OP>PnNn v 2 J w 2Uu n2 SV> ~_J 2 nV V n L O f2 L VG C1LL vv nZVf UT Z JVOO N:`„= fOf OVU= a>.r • r0 O f Vma pwr tV pmpN NJV fU NOit +[OV ri l wir f wiV •NJ mS •lO ~ pOWWOpSImSNfC dim iNiS0Y2 1Jf 6f~ S N N Ui LLZfw nS OJ N26f mf2Wla\ ir22fJirOJW• wtm i7m Or iWrrOWiLLOifNWiv ViLLf OO 1.yW wf2rwi wN vYN r •rlOi ~.LLOO= i U TVfmO Wrr• i3 V2Y6NWNO fmmO f O:J 139f JO O Imif vvO 00 iflW wrWWWWORC[mf LL J 7 ff• 1ffm1 mOOmOOmJJVUVVUUU VV VOOOOO ILLLLLLLOO •+IVPnm Omm1O NNnPOPT•n •1•Oi• • rv~l• n ONONNfP•O• 000001 : :. mo~oN.ma~nnpP.pmm.Nnpa°PmPPmNPnmm~FaeamDNpp.paPOOnp D~°. T• mm~m a N °1 m.INO PDnNa<N mPOnNm<NOnm N.OFinapn mPa S% v~m mwl~n ¢1 Mmm mmnl OnFnrPnnnnFnNn>nNNn rnMNNNNnnNnnnhnrNMNnnnnnnnl.n FFFNn •l1 • _ _ _ _ • • •• • • m • JN6 ` I • m°2r i V ~ a i u¢p< ~ ~: ~ em f ins ~ n w m p s N No rm i:oar. u`¢ ND.. LP mV¢ wL v • • r\ UP aJ „ " L LL 2 NVn VOWZW JO m e p¢ oDw.rrm [ ~ mVF JS WW 00 >Jm NJw O•N • O V <O~ w6 <J LL~ =i •Sn ¢iL 1 V \ [J YI JW f2VNWFW ¢ry V¢ VV <V FV W t W3 r N I >Va0¢ wi rOw m\ >UNYMV •O Nil<wl¢f <SwL• »xJ0> wJmO iWm <S iNVYF WZ•r0 OLZZ ~ N tl i64Jpw ¢iJO•N NV¢mNr~6ip I li l<TZ w \ '~'~ ` tl w N u '• ~ ~ r i~ pL u .O Np \ U\W W O.I 2 JW u j.N i e<z JuNm< ¢ ° ' a z on w az Lz y z >.s ~ ' . .: ¢w o N :iz ni°m " `s~o~iHW°.J.C9~r m.< ¢yC map Wil '^< ¢na~N •w w a u ' ° r n LL . . ¢ i: i . No ip ~ '° ~D Wi NOUC =o .~ y n o e ¢p m •¢p ro aw.i~ +iN em¢sprm> J¢Wr~' mo.°. ~l¢..iW .N[Jr • 11 ° • r• ON NON J MZ SL v F Jnn6>i~iC[ JON°OW ° W tl W :: > . ,~I w iPeDOf prJ yr u i iu . DwG` p\: ~>06>mVtl irw VN [JVS NiYGN» 60[C>NJrOLiL SNYNE~N r O VLL V nY0 wS _ _ N S V n Z <w ~ f Y p0'L u m _ !S >[ JWh L WL NSO LLiY r ° S VV ..V ~i 2 V JO> r iyOm N OJ yj N N JNV 2 W JV F O N ¢ mV> N w OfU¢ N Ww V O. O w ¢J ° N w rm~LL 6M e\V O<¢ N r n ¢ Vi uju Vi1 ¢ u: •:S wQY Jl 10i yv ZZV N J J ` • J OLwrw :Fr O m° 4:6JZ¢ wJtlruu <JN?wVV¢ VSJ uw m <O• w= WVWL6VlSJ• NOp00 •n <1 J rl • •~° ~yWn<~N Jr w oZwrYV¢~¢¢WNtl F*N:N tl>m`N =Nf ~ F¢NSN NJ•iZi~VJ r r m • Ir[pV¢ •N r~NF J MOOJ •WN<ZZtl JWW 6 WNf Sw NO ~ 1 LLJ TWO fw w r CLJ . OOOOWV p6 L OOJWJ w Fmm Nu F tlNJry N: W=pNV WWN JN <W2~<NFO iiw JOJV tl W O LL •[• _ _ ~ onF¢NOZVJ Oi `w i2. VrR >V CN LVZfwr¢09M iL L [ •L 0 VVVZLLr~r l.!¢r[JJJJ000Jiiii L 00°D¢nGC¢¢NNNHNNNN tl1 • NONNP mmOnNOPn NOhafNyNrvOPrmmNNnNN ONN fNFNON NPNnwPNPmN •O• P~I^ NOPNONI PN<mP:T f"O is NNNN Nma nn a. a nnm rn~ +InN N°nnwn°mN nn N m mmP mm • • VOV~Ii ~+ iNP ~~rv pf+ z) iwo 0 I ~ jw~ iii ¢~ ~Z~ os a o .. o~nnnnn.... ..n ~.m-nnnn:n..-.-r if • • • V up ~ L mi fn • 0 2Vf o~ u i w .•i ee w ~V nif _ ~IfYW JLJ¢ O ~i rim ews .elmz fivNe ~~•• rsn o + f~f ioz Win N.J,~i.°. nwi u >Iw V~V uJl alf miN • wM?wO •Jf ^~ FIFN LZJ LJVP NJW n•af~Wiiu uiim w4O moNloumOYwZUiNSSp+ J S N +_ IVO wn o n NwLLwYN w 1 w N .~ VwiV 2~. l NSN 2J ft~ wVpuWUw~ yw umUau.n JSM1 JJwfnf )fwZ• eZ ZV ZCwU\ UVnZVI Nib of ¢frN G¢¢ HJnJm .+.ii ooenfa .ewfi NNN NNNNnn » .)aiia)a). nP~m na N 000003 . v.nN nONeCNP.sNPNCp00?emPNeM1 c•oe.-npP P~°n n..PPmoNeeNPPONNnmoeoaTNONea oo:ra.:drir.nnioNe::.~irv~~.~.~r,. N..~o:eo:e:.~. l.eeaeee:e:o:~e Pam m.oaNemeNrNh•mmNmPNOeeNaNalah N a1m • r PN .. N N NnrN.. hr NP F10 <; Ofn za ON fP^ ..NTVNahOPOrnTINYhOPOrNT•NOMYPO+N TINa1`OPO 6ah.~h..-hhnwOY00 i WI.~TTTTmTmTTI1TTT~^.nn~wYl~~Tmmmn~niP.1~~r~~011i1iV~VIr~J~V~• OMnFh1.F wMnFNnMNhhhhhPYhhFn.n.~Th h1.>hhhM1FhPMMnPnN!-I. I.h Y __ _ _ _ VYIY e • NO N P\ YP N P [P \N Y _ 1 n\ T\ •I- \ \ \ h fV \ PN hR Yi F OP \T NW \ r WZ\ N N PP \ Ir I' N L\ ryY + OWN N N =W \\ r FV aN nt NJf Wr r O W O\ .. rp OW nZ • YVYW W Vi M \O Yh WV I OV• W ~J .. i NZ If 1T •LLI L. p WJOOI > 1 YVZ NJ ^ N W S L 10 [ Mt 1 OW OW Nn 1 Y\ 00 O. WN.. NI<10 NNNL WJ.- WpfNOn y~ p nV R_WWW WyOOLYh i fWWWV_1 n06w•WWWFP N mJIiJ4J ~ZN\f Y'J W\iOJW..iVtOM V p \ Ys Y<.i"iliaw P•r.f.l- ~ ~~~srconn.•nu~11~~~N hVw2hO..MhiJOWihTJWit•'.fiiWMTih h•n• ONYZOLWW h\ f .- WVpSJN .WJWW~JN w wN 7i'J IYNWNPWOOIJNN J O[n niF WWNi O1fOF•N JhY6N<i LNMN NNY61YhN NLr in<~wP\JNih iLNLLOfi OWiR J•.. ..IW ZYI< W• NiW W VVNlWJV..OYJ W r W ..OLeN.. Jwr PJ_<Jrn•J •V•YJYN VwL<W~•hJ i J Vyy _ LW<JJJy~/ W N OOi 2NW0 hi1LZr<i I.pOW O~iZN YhW9i0ONtO.ii hFp hN0 fi ONJY {LL WOOOaOf<f0 Si0 00p<00 V UJ~WYYV'JfhJVWW2JOYfNVJ000WWUiiL ZiY>.JyVLWYW VNhYVNVYhW<NpOhVNYWOVi<O• GNNhhhYY~ JtVNN oN.Nhsep.i.<N>suhrw Wl. Op 1>szzWee .Y ._ wi:Y _h2> SNN`Zf ale iM.IMW~FNjJStIJ ~Ci:V<WN JJ~W<W V =>LLJ U:WJWi<WW ~I CC C < O».Oi [9•NNNiNiNN>ViLL••NWP•~[ <O.M>W•6i0i `W~ 7 » J iiFFY n NMJJJ Y.»7 2 V WWVVV i JJ Yr.M N SM J JJtiW 2 N O> .F• [ VN ZZOOO r W p<~ •N Z. Ope00 N ° wn toN .u i<Ni N.: .iii. > <W> zN us .uh~J J P'[ hih ff 'JYWY NJJNw•WWY iw NO O WN ipW N>Z WO OOOV <wj i NN OOOUw iWU WhN.'.N 000 2 <N WL[C O fl WN>JJV ;< ONZ <NNY F<• •<Jih P..SWi NNiZWOiwJ N•N.>FhY•rOOV V .iy. NOV hOiif i.. <WWWwwy>Wypji NJiV W~p• .JJ.Y wt\VYOW<w JJ nn n.i M< L V<ONSJ[YZOwi.l<W f0 h.0; NJJJYVVN>VwOJN NNOFM wINf FJN N.. w[O>F<J.W lNp .7NWN tN«<000 <Nl ipi Zt .i0 ii[ ~ Op\WM ~Vr»NNNW .wL•N1. O O..\V. .IVOWYOWV> WW<yNt wO<M iJ .i.NY .[i[N i • i2M6 <. Ni00SLNYNNi6<JNi<YNN Nf Ih00. .LO< Ip .O wVUO<VYJi<iYN.W.V.O~.LY~~MOOr~NSCOifV[WYY~~<JJ J'V'IiNINOJ FYiY>iY\JJJiiiiFiiYYi>SY •<WWJNOOOJJMF.W;7<;Yw • «WNJ<Y« <YWN0000« WYJNRYpOOMhiiii[[<OJ[<O< J « « LOOOOOOVUVUUVVVYVVVOOOWWWYYVLLSSwYNNNMl11tH JJ[ aeNONMTOmNPOTrOhPNNTNf aN NI•.IP ITTA•P OIPN•II+NPM•eN n n•INhN aNePmmNl..o•N+ P• NaooaomleNP NnNndPTNrNP NTmP NTT r TN nM ni.l i.l TNr N Op0004 u_ ` USC pfT u<N Sew <Op OjG E N; .E :i :L. ~~ \• ~ Nei •. z: lu i i of ~i i n~ ~o: •i• /6• ii i z • ~ iii •<• ii ioi •i• •W• •>• .awm opeeneeeTmo FPPee Y era Na wnieeeeea •i~~oooNa~ ~Newmm'iNi NamnNNO wTPTn eaeawaomN n ~.+NTaNa~mP e..NTananmPO-.NTaNhIPp.NTaNa wi:«««++Ni: ^aTTi:"'iiiii as Siaa SiS+ ni'".Nr TTTTTTTTTTTTTTNTmTmTTTTn~INTT Po ~n~~.T.n nnN1.T1-rr-NNrrrYnr-rnwn n~.nwnr nr-r ~ _ eV N• \ I~ 1 \e JrpiwT h •rT \NfawMw NN \O \N PiVTNO NJbr NI N\N ZJb i<\N N7NNN1 <J• \Y n/ wT TJ• pniV VTww aY!< OFbv mP\W w2 wbN OmNbM~ ue~ 17 WI ml• IW~ wViiL Yf J 6NSVwT \I WLM 6 PI ~i10 V<Z YiNiN9i J< N\ ffYOmP ~~J _w wb\w0 17WWWm OW_N\YpN N~~N\t OLW 4V fVLr O y F~ Vj VZW VrW NNiOw'J NJO w111W20 •V Y JL BlOilwl iua LwZ WfZ prVZl •O WU=~. ONaO hYwJ ~NUI-wiW •LlwtiiZt!)• aeip'jW~J •\~OpO ~rbL60 mn00 Y~LiN fILIVwNOW bWVZ <TJiN ObLLpyrVWtZLW Wi NOVJiiWZF LLZ mfFPJWYF NZiZNmO O W606si~ wwIZO0YV2 a0 JniP r WWWV TTJm OVOry Oh SujZNYW~F~J wvVrVYVVPin 1N< imi<FrUOfLJNNOwtp<tN ZNI wmrONVhi 'JFi9ZiwWribOOF•WZ~rp~Z •NV Tm Z\si~jJ~jO i VMZYiWiW WIL\O~tzWlYpi\JY a`W~\J~G rJ Wi N~ < w < GG O <ii>JNOVpON<ZIL lF100JOVF iZfWi« O W Y i Y V O f F N O f h i i N i N f i 'J O \ if i L V W Ow N Z 1 V V ryi W i Y6 6 N ZU W fV Y i F V N ILL ZN M N) O i ~V F f 76 V un N t OJ Ni i\ Wf Y7 Ni 1 Z V_ i iU VO ipO •zb N Ni ou ibi- V 1-O• Z~ «LLW YV WN OU1\ Wii mWWV<F 60i •f W9Ma YO ::~~ WS»N :°e i~ :i ":WC O~QP 6300iiOW JIi NVJOUVO YJ WVV NWiFF fP ZiWi<O V?<YV<NWM u i ~V Nw off pfWO• FiJVYN w9Y LLMaY •J JJ2 fib iJFI F MVY JJ W14 pfyw _f VaYOZN Of OpOFWF\OJ~OWiN y<IV Y~~PYO YJOOYbViZOiY00Nb10iYOZ JVJZNV6 iiooo a<NOOUpNfzii » «NOV oOOWb<W<W iizzisz:zzzoapbbbbboiiiiN NNNromzNN NNIna000PPNlPPaFNahMN nNMN<NnP ~aNaNN<Naa NNnINNV •TNwPnnOn PnaP NTNP PPNwN/N P N mn w mw T N acmes V Np YI Via y~0 1 a00 O•.C LL ~E a. \• O• 2• ~ m1 ~V is i ~~ ~V~ •r i f Zt~ ~i~ i i O~ •W• YaI-o mam Nam NOmNO OOppoO+ 1o FuaioaNmN Nmh~PNmm~p ra m NNN marN r m nN+mrP m mrNrN..a NmN ra . N N a.amN a•n N N ~YPOrNm+NanmPO.Nn+NaFrhorrvn+NamPeNNn•N al-mPOrrvmaN mmm nmmmmmnmmnmmmm~nmm~mmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmnmmmm OhNMhM1M YI•w.•I.1....•YI-PNM1MF wI.1•PNhM1hPFFI•h.~h.•hhhhNhhhhhhl•nY V Im VhN ~.V.h 1! 1\ 1 !m!! Y u r -m .°.e n i00P a ..N ~\! N N m V NIVV VV 1 JFJJN J J .~ wN NLImuNnaN> »~ r WV VV R N Y F S P J IL P fSi OY1 N •PN J W W O! f •a mn _ _ U =F f S O• l>Y !! ! f O 1 V 1 LLK> OC.. LJ •.V V V •.V V ~V VJ i .- .1 C JJ J 6 VJ ~z niWr u.We O°NN ~'iw ~'~F'N bl e~ >w WmN ~m1Y Wmr mW~> em ILf JF WI7FN: NTm F SFOi OF\MNN[ SVPN JNZ SONS Z\.[WWNp YJJm4 VYI ..FO YNN V)NF_ pw\>`J~O FthiWp.ViWL LOJ WIZW w.NwY SiSZ VILLVWS W f G • V _ _MGWOO\06 .JfYFf~ mOf V NV) WJMW~mNr` nIYO)Jm WJtiJWiI<LLiW~~WWW>Y~)WMrJi~6 )+hWNSrvwiOlmJemV>OOYO)JLLJO p'e Q u '. N u i .+.W. Yw zz.. N ) N u o v ~ Nz a W ~r iW Woo J ~ N SN WK~• ~SRhm V wL JWU)NZ NNY)VOVa NZMf I.7h Y W•SiYG2l iiiJUNNJfO O LL~W ZY JVfZOV NON VN fNN OiNr n mVWfn~JOnVSJ.ii umi ~ViJwWNY SOmN OYC60WY«J? Lm <i Ztf\ WiJ \2 •\ W<FO W_JVM1YGiJ•.J WYWW\'Z KLr•. 00 <LLYN ZYZwO Q..JYVVV\wi JGWWWfi•.N JF09Niu J6hJFNNFfJRYf JJOfMiRiF<J[iWN J11Jfa « OOeOVVVUUVVVVVVYVVJ [ ua\omN~m mm\ Y ~ N ..WZLLIL Nr.W LLLL.7 wON vu.W. hhooo )o OONNLL peJ WWYYYIwY J PO LP NZ 22VSWnV J w2 Y. J~iiiiYimii<z~ J60 JLL \aY6N\CY4.•if V<JIL fYwwwaiWlaL pVCV rpwo fJ000PVOPOOZJfWo u z .L. J ~ rs s zr. O LN N 1C C <O 1-ONVh V J 2 V i J J f •KW iV VfSNfrfFiO \O'6 N ZR <O_._.N VL i lY¢<Y> OVV a v JiW L4J .OVNm~~fi V. _ '11WiWW>Jy <ZV..\W OW WIS<N..f OVJ I~hiO f~Vh Wr.O\sS<2Vrmhs~t~ 7MWf VJLV>wrYh000>iSi VOOW WwwwwWULLV T.22in. r.N maNah plNPmpOmaOnN+N NNPn amn mNnN ml•aprNNNry m P rveh r~eaamhh+n+.-np Na„ nNl. r.-NN.. m_N..aw+MN N NPFNNNNm~hPrr wmlh Pr NNaNNn Nr Tyrnr mrp ppwa Py OVVVV - U V rl yu0 210 ¢ r 4 W N; \~ o;) Z• C O~ :i: ~O~ v1 O~ 1L• ~rvri~ • ~ •f~ tit •¢• ~OO~ isi ~W~ i)• nIr000roaa nNOnOpNma ^ Patlaryam w1N mOTPa n .~ n mN T Iln• N N n r NaY/Pp~NN•NarOPO.~NNf NarePOwNN•NaYOPp~IN mfNaY0m0 NN~N 7.S S, J,S a\NY,' mrNN-nnmm~NNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnNNNNNnmNNmm~nnnmm~mnn anrrrrrr r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.~-.rhrrrrrrrYr~- S NO O/\ / ~\ L ~ V W =F6 W~ f L neN • O w/ JJ yW w L i n J 14VZr a NOMJ 7 ~ N n0 Jrwry ril aNLLV W_ hV Y` Y N\¢ r PP0:0 WN \_J i Y / <iWi \ fr~ON rN Ni U~ • OfV •~\ • V JaU •M• //FW\ •~ N NiWOZQ YV U ¢~ VHN~`~ NN000 JPY iia• wM N ° iL MWWN/ ~O<OJV_ iU JIJ J IJ NO W)WJZJ O PWN~ J\l/ NU`\Z NNj ~r \nYhZN ~i ~ ~W\/fhO OWIY\ VZZyp~ V V OOJr¢¢ ¢~ •J YWW '~NmJi wOWwLL6LF0 Ono W NOO~O L¢O _f 020yN YF_JNrJ OOF n N _ pN° r_ L\n0_LWL O W^n JOi J ZJU ~JN\V in LN.4O Ww W7L Nuii• Ni NIONYJMNZONO u wJ0 ONNO O <JKWOWO S66rhOWOYO ¢QU •~aiJrY L° N N 1yWw o o~N V aL N aver .. NrwVN NL1•VF F VYZe°ei NY i•N 2N LWjWJOW JW2rUlm JWLO'W 2wNNwNp°uiiO ~OryOPfOYYmLL J VZZVZNOL Vi==FWwONi02 =WOOhU1Li¢i =0 wNrriW J6 O LrWNiJfNf ~\ w¢ MLy<ZNiH\i\NS IO miN ¢p VO¢ ¢S<iW HSWL nV 7ii LnyL¢iL<w N NZ Nuw iw WOUaPLWw¢ O;yJ¢p¢JWyWiWVNWOYWi6WOUV•INf V_ IW \ JW N: •>O~W \O OO):mOJN)Wf) f V nZOYOiNOJ¢OZ iVOP OOOnZ¢\fLYLLOWJO O¢ OeO~ N V ti O O N i O W\ i wY y i°oiN N Nz NYC u o n • i N V [ Nl Z Ni 6 )¢ w l L V= uV •„ Ny N NLL ~w J •N _ ° _ _ _ .r uu SO \ O 2NNWr Wr Y WJi ON ! ¢ N ON Na\wF.y i°Oy O =• W¢VJw O¢N LN z °w .Wii ~J+ly..\lN sN n¢¢ SyN Qi~l\i~v° .°.i iowa WJVrVi)O.J6 n'JVVJJ \pn wie wlWWUL\a P 1WW N MNS ~Oirwn N 1 !lYJiuri i /Vehi ip° WNYr SI •i0 JWNVL •i/)J OJfV YiYwww lNwwY2) h2JiONN/fWV¢<r V ~)YY OJ O<WO WLJ • la OlN •\•wY¢NJMGUVMNJJVVVO Neil •Ni)WNO1•rwOi Je •OiN/iWYi Oi C SVWeJ„~<\MYOJ JWnJJ eOlnO NViw •1 NYYWwwM :i •2F J :hVLapaf LLWWh tOZi Y\YOWWOfINWYWOOIJu N 6RUOr=NJ 1Yi i UWyrYil;h \nlriJhe Z JrNilfO iF nl¢9VZlfVJI VVML OVLiNNn000ViWJ)/WiifV ~i iJ•lZZ• InOO\a•,O »wMViZf\a\a\LMM000¢f¢f WMO<\/WY n lf[u<JJJJJtZiillZip006ii6LLLOLLLLOLLL~¢/OeiNNNNN ONnOOONNPOONTn NI.NryaaarOPe P ONN•l/NNar Na.In TH n nnmNa n.N.m Ala-cN`Mln noNnNNNrPeNinr~a//aen„/NeeeN\N PNN NNaPNN NPT'I NON N r~PPP NNP nNnPPa Nnnln/NwON /NNO / e ~~~7 2 v o n iNP usi 2 IL O \00 Oj¢ ~i ~: ii xi p• ¢~s~ iii i i i i i i ~O• rn 1¢ n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~W~ ~i• i 3 ioi ~w ~>: hcN~-i Na °N ~'N°NhM° ^FGGM ~ _ ` VO x ¢ i¢ v W e e ¢ ¢ • i r : Z i p0 J LL J Y N V O y P ILLL L J f w~1WQ Cfe Nu a~~aWO "no~•a.`ry.Niv '~awff \mim`°e e`Oo wi¢~O MVtOJ\OJp }JJf'.f0 O\IJ fN00 ~\ 72`F Pf'JYJ 0OWiwIL2 •h~w f ~~i WOWJOw eZF WIVV~ `iiOiW WiNS~ CYJiJi VOW6> JPWV ~JYOJ~WOY Oa¢ON¢~6WaVOZNOa w p N N j V Ofi \„ O f VOw O : • 6 J Zw ZJ¢ O OWVW \O w~ ip~W JNN S• V 2w\ W VRYZWJZ OFD ¢pp~ti .i 600 rLLiOVV• aN V J ¢OL w F=Y=2 WJVNOW~[ VtiGit MJffJR erpofe .i: Wfo wNNNrw>>aiiiinnw PaOmmNgOw00N0f~V •NNNMn.w n.~n~v Nl~nryp r/~NOTII Ow OO qN -a mom 649 a- L ~~: _ S'. a ~~ L.. € -` €S ~o - ~k .. I - .. - Sp 1' ~ ~ a ;F%~d f Y ~ ,. '. o' _. a .. ', ice=: - .~. .. ._ ., ..~X'.F .. .~ ,. `Y F' ,~ ' oO~J '~k T . C e~5.,y C d':.ti .2"cam Y: '=$x_ N § Y' S .. ': k.. ° _ ~ __~ n . '", sameex ..~~~~~..~~ z .. .~ s ~ .z« mPam s e. A H l m a a P. _ .•:;. F:fi SRR SR ~ -.° ~.. ~ ..: ~~Y'm - _ .. a Ed m - <.RSSA B _ _ __ :l. _m S~3s ~.. ~Y S~ _ d _ 'V~~t~ ~ ~J w~6..o~e n4 s ' .E.~,. ~YY'Y Y k:~'.i n W~ yc S °34Y ROI 4 kx Y.a % m 'I'C P ' _ ,. n. . . 4 .,u ~ ~ ~ K .: ~ m e v ... ~ ~ P .. 8. .. e ~: ` .. ... ...~.-.-.~... _ Vi : ; i z. (~ QOnn~o P Y ~: 5. 3' r oOvo~ j m : C. f't P ~ m ~^ iR a `n£ ._i cy'i .fin ~'_:~- _ _ ~~ :~ +t ^ti k Q~\yV~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 2Q, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Gry Manager FROM: Charles J. Suquet B, Mayor Pro Tem BY: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LOCATING A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACCOUNTING CENTER AT THE SITE OF NORTON AHt FORCE BASE IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY The City Council adopt the attached Resolution supporting location of a defense accounting center at Norton Atr Force Base. AB8LYS19 The SANBAG Board adopted the attached Resolution at its January 6, 1993 meeting and has asked local jurisdictions ro adopt similar Resolutionx. The purpose of the Resolution is to provide support of dte legislative efforts ro locate a Defense Accounting Center at Norton Av Force Base. The siting of a Defense Accounting Center at Norton Av T'otce Base will provide needed employment for San Bematdino County and its surrounding jurisdictions in addition to becoming an economic asset in the region. Respec~~J W 'Iced. Charles J. Buquet H Mayor Pro Tem Attachment: Resolution 000013 RFS~DUJFIa7 ND. q 3 - 00~ A RESOIlIP2~7 OF Tiff CITi ~D[IIiCII. OF R1iE Cll'Y OF RANCHO CI7CN~JNC.A, CALIFOAhIIA, SUPPOIII'rNG LJCATION OF A DFFAIaMENP OF DEFENSE A(C,DUNPDJG CFNFER AT 7fIE STTE OF NOHION AIR FbRCE BASE IN SAN BE~i1mIIJ0, (`AT TFbId7IA Wfff'72FAS, Norton Air Force Base is in the process of closing as part of o~tt nations defense reduction, arcl is therefore beimg prapcsed for vazious reuse activities user the jurisdiction of the Inlay Vall bevel Agency; and eY opmet~t 4h43iFA.S, Norton AFB has housed for several decades, in addition to flying missions, a large variety of sizeable Air Force units, irc;ludiry audit, inspector Ge»etal, safety, and audiovisual f ~ arci W1Q~RFA.S, because of this backgruud and many other similar public and private operations in the genay-al loation, the San Bernacdinp area has an abu~inoe of skilled workers who can respond inmediately to the iris of sudr an turnuntircl canter; and td{E[tFAS, California State University San Bernarrlinn }~ a highly acclaimed utdergraduate and graduate program in anrountirg, with a great marry wellyualified graduates annually, and with other four year amd two year colleges and Universities also providing an able supply of aocamti~ tecd~niciar~s at all levels; and WE~RFF7+S, the area has experienced, and is wntinniry to experience, dramatic arc? debilitating job losses in a qr~t marry oowpati~al sectors, as oonseg<renoe of both defense reduc.-lions arcl the general eowwnic distress; W1•fRf-45, other recent a~ planvrt3 job-site closures, both military and corporate, includug Gamle AFB, Falser Steel, I,or]dx+ad Aircraft, General Dynamics, arci TISI, have similarly devastated the area eooranically; arct WHEREAS, the San Br-rnarciitn area offers an affordable housitg market and marry other welwte attributes to rx~.w employees, even beyond the sizeable labor force already available; and NhffRFA.s, siting of a Defense Aomunrtirg Omer at Norton AFB enjoys enthusiastic anmty-wide support, beause it b~onr_s a major employer and ecnnanic asset thrarghwt our far-fluty cwnty arcl in the multi~ty region while also dramatically reducing long distance conrtutes and the air pollution associated with the wasteful travel; and WfiFRFRFAS, all the jurisdictions in San Bernazdiro Oounty will, find themselves and their workforoes similazly benefitted th' the location of such a center. NON, 74ff12EEORE, the City Ceuncii of the City of Rancd~o tloe9 h~'~i' slrpPort arxi Psd'use the proposal by the Inland Valley Development AgeMY and urges the Depaxtinent of Defense to approve location of a Defense Accounting Center at the site of the Norton Air Force Base. ~1 V ~J~-'~+i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATfi: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director SY: xathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation superintendent Karen Metcham, Recreation Supervisor SUBJECT: POUNDERS DAY PARAD% EVALUATION AND MODIFICATION REVIEW PROCESS Staff initiate en evaluation and review of the City~m Annual Founders Day Parade and the approval of questionnaires ae proposed by the Park and Recreation Commission at its December 17, 1992 meeting. This evaluation would include sending questionnaires for feedback on parade, reviewing parade operations in other citiee, researching pro and poet pereda activities to enhance attendance, and providing n complete financial breakdown of current and proposed costs toi the pereda. Community Services staff was requested by the Park and Recreation commission and city council to propose ways o! reviewing and modifying the pereda. A complete report on steff~e findings la due back to Council/Commission in early spring. The following list of projects era being proposed by staff to help answer questions end issues as raised by City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission regarding the parade. o Conduct a meeting to discuss and review alternative parade routes with representatives from Engineering/Maintsnance, Fires Department, Police Department, Administrative 8srvicse and Community services Department. o Discuss with the Chamber of Commerce their two announcing stands along the route. Topics to include problems end successes of the stands at those locations, last ainutes ohanges in the soripL, and other improvements/suggsetions on the part at the Chamber. CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOUNDERS DAY PARADE EVALUATION PROCESS January 20, 1993 Pegs 2 o Request from Pageantry Productions the Haase, costs, and specific duties of other cities which contract Pageantry to provide parade cervices. o Discussion with Pageantry Productions regarding: - Large gape in the parade, in aces cases up to tan ninutu in length. - The need for bands to play only at judging booths and not at other locations. - Siailar typac of groups leaped together 1n t1u limup. - Equastrlan groups waiting a long tSae between judging end actual aarchinq tine. - Script and lineup changes not given to the announclnq booths. - Need !or staff et disbanding area Heads to have a radio. o Contnct the cities o! Bellflower, Downey, ftollywood and Chino, all of which also contract Pageantry !or their parades, to revive their parade ectivitiac in relation to Pageantry and the involveaant of other city agenciac, organisatlonc and service clubs. o Develop an inforaational sheet--halplul hints to participnnta, to include: - Map of staging arse. - Location of chock-in. - Location of all restrooa tncilitias. - Mention the length of wait between check-in and etepyinq oft, which Se potentially a two-to-three hour aait. - suggactian to bring wetar and snacks for the wait, ea wall es a first eid kit end sun saraen. - Pencnka Braakfsat--cost, tics, end location. Q~16 C1TY COUNCIL l1BETING FOUNDERS D11Y PARADE BVALUHTION PROCESS January 20, 1993 Page 3 - Tiae and location of sward csrgony/live band before and after. - Snack bar--available during awarfl cereaony. o Developaent o! a questionnaire to be sailed to the tollowinq groups aho participated or were involved in this year's parade. A draft of the quastionnalres is attached for your review. - Park and Recreation cossisaion - Public Sataty Coauiasion - Police Depertsant - Citiaen Patrol - Volunteers - Chaaber of Cosserae - Naintenanae Stai! - Rnndosly drawn entries in all judging categories - City Council and other elected otlicials o "General Publio Queetionneiree~ should be included in Spring and Winter Grapwine of 1993. o Discuee with Citizen Patrol their aveilebility to work at the awnrds aergony in addition to working the parade. o Uttar to the judges to disease: - The increase in tine taken to tally parade results. This occurred wen though the nuawr of participants did not increase. - How increased tallying tine vas an inconvenience to participants/stet! and resulted in baA public rilstions. In addition, how increased tallying ties resulted In sdditional staff tile. - The desire o! the City to find a solution to this problq and ask for their input to b. aura that their tabulation tine ands no longer than t5 ainutes alter the parade hss ended. - That the judge should stopp only the bands at the judging stand snd not every participant. The length of the Lisa of the parade was extended at least 1/2 hour as a result of their action. This preatiae slso caused gape In the parade. ~1~ CIT" ^CDNCIL MBETffiG FODc. "DAY PARADE RVALVATIOM PROCBSS January ~J, 1993 Page 4 o The pouibility o! bolding the post parade went and arards cereaony aL the Sports Complex will be rwiewed, including costs of the use of the atadivl. o A coaplete financial breakdown of the parade owr the past lour years rill be coapiled. o Select the parade thew earlier in the year so sore attentiom can ba drawn to tM went. o Stott will dw~lop a aatrix to rwier the Rancho Cucuonga pnrade in comparison to tlu cities of Mlltlowr, Downey, Hollywood, atW Chino, sll of wblah are produced Sn lull or part by Pageantry. In addition, to include the Clty of lullertan, which produces their parade in-hove. The sstrix rill ltsaluMs Lull cost breakdown, tunQinq sources, participant lwels, spectator iwels, oo-sponsor imrolwsents, ana otper itm ae they ariw out of ditowsion rith stet! from thew coaunities. stet! le confident that by waluating/rwlewinq all of the shwa coaponents of our parade re rill be better able to anersr questions and issues raised by Council/COaipion, and will be able to begin to addraaa hor w can enhanom the 1993 parade. R epa~c/!/fully submitted, ~1~ c~ rry lwood, Deputy City Manager/ACt1e~q osaunity services Director JP/RS/Idt/kL Attachfents Questionnaires THE FOLLOWING QDESTIONB WOULD BB ASKED OF ALL CITY BMPLOYSES NBO WORKED THE PARADE. 1. Durinq the pounders Day Parade what ware your reeponsibilitiaa? 2. Nhnt typs of quastiona warms you aakad about the parade by apectatora, psrticlpants, or zaaidants. 3. Wbat typaa of training or inlorastion would Nava bean halptul to you in ansraring the quastionr lroa the public. 4. Nara three things the City can do to anhanw iha psrsda. 1 a 3 5. Additional Coaaattta: PLEASE RETURN YOUR CONPLBTSD SURVEY lORlt TO BY Thank youl PARTICIPART QDESTIOMDIIRS TR8 FOLLOWING QST88TION9 WOULD H8 ASRSD OF RANDWQ,Y-SBLHC'LHD PARTICIPANTS OF THIS YBAR'9 PARADE. 1. Was thin your list tiea partioipatinq in the City o! Rancho Cucelonga'a FOUndera Day Parade? Yea No If no, how eany years have you participated? 2. Did you attend the poet Parade Award wrsaony thin year at Red Hill Pnrk? Yee No _ Ii you did not attend the Poet parsM Award oere~ony, why not? 3. Wov1A a shut of helpful parade hints, ouch ae oheak-in location, locaticn o! rutroaee, and potential veiling period prior to slap ott, Mlp prepare you !or the psrade7 Yee No 4. What types of hints would you pees on to other partioipsnts? 5. Do you teal the availability of loud or refreehwente wss... Adequate Inadequate If inadequate, please list suggeation of possible vendors 6. 1. a. 3. Ntue three things the City esn do to enhance the parade. PARTICIPANT QLTESTSDNNAIRE Page 2 7. Would you or your group stay or bring people to participate in the lollovlr:q activities ii held in conjuncttion rich the parade? Please check those activities you could be interested in attending. Pre-Parade faorninal 9^~~-Parade [a ++.oon-ev ~*e) o A Fun Run o Crett Pair/Carnival o Chili Cook-0!! _ o Arards Groony o Mwioal Concert _ 8. Additional Cosaents: PLEASE RETURN YOUR CONPLETED BORVBY PORT( TO BY Thank you! GRNAtAL POBLIC QOEBTIOIINAIR6 THE FOLLOIiING QOESTIONS NOTJIA B8 INCJL*+DRD IN THE SPRING GRAPEVINE TO RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM THE GENERAL r7BLIC RSGl1RDING TRB PARADE. 1. Have you ever attended the City's Annual Founders Day Parade? Yee No Did you attend thin year's parade? Yae ,_ No It you did not attend this year's Parade, why not? 2. If you attended this yaar'• Parade, what Qid you li]u bast about the Parads? 3. Difl you attend the Poet Parade Award aera~ony thin year st Rad Rill Park? Yea No _ If you did not attend the Poet Parade Award aeraorry, why not? a. Nerve three things the City can do to, in your opinion, to enhance the parade or antics you to attend the parade. 1. __ a. 3. 5. Nhiah of the lolloving aativitiaa would your Laaily attend ii held Sn con~unetion with the parade? Plaaee ahaak all that you would be interested in attending. Pra-Parade faorninal Poet-Parada_(sitarneon-aveninaf o A Fun Run o Cratt Fair/Carnival _ o Chill Cook-Ofi _, O AMArde GrgOny ,~ o Nusioai Conaart _ 6. At whet location did you view the parade? Q~ GENERAL PUBLIC Pages 2 7 No e. How did you hear about the Parade? Newspaper Poster Radio Flyer Tha Grapevine Other 9. Additional Co~antea PLEASE RETORN YOUR COMPLETED 8STlCVEY PORN TO BY Thank you! Nere you near an announcing stand? Yea _ IP yea, what did you like or dislike? ~L~ SLSCPSD/APPOIHTED oFFICIALB QIIBSTIONNI-IRS THE FOLLOWING 4UESTIONS NOtlLD BE ASKED OF XLSCTSD/APPOINTED OFFICIALS NNO PARTICIPATED IN THE PARADE. 1. What did you like beet about the Parade? what did you like least about the Parade? 2. Did you nttend the Poat Parade Award ceremony Chia year At Red Hill Park1 Yee No _ 3. Would n sheet of helpful parade hints, such as cheek-in location, location of rastrooms, and potential aaitinq period prior to step ott Relp you on the day of the pareda7 Yee No 4. List three things staff can do to enhance the parade. 1. a. 3. 5. Would you like to see the City expand the Pnrade to include pre-pnrefle events/poet pnrade activities, ouch am those listed beloa. Please cheok those activities you would like staff to investigate and/or would ba interested in attending. Pre-Parade (morning) gQ/t-Parade tafternoo~sxsnin¢1 o A Fun Run o Cralt Fair/Carn val o Chili Cook-ot1 _., o Awards hremony _ o Nualcal Concert ._ ~{~' PARTICIPATING ELECTED/APPOINTED OFFICIALS QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 6. Additional Coaaenta: PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMPLETED SURVEY FORK TO BY Thank youl Q~ DATE: January 20, 1993 x ur nntv~nv i:ui;e~mvivve+ STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor anfl Members o! the City Council Jack Lea, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy city Manager/Acting coaunity services Director 4 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR DISPLAY OF PARR AND RECREATION COMMI83ION'S 2ND PLACE TROPHY At tl:e December 17, 1992 Park and Recreation Coaission meeting, it was racoaandsd that this year's 2nd place trophy lrom the Annual Founders Day Parade be placed in the showcase for display. The Park end Recreation Coaieaion won second place in the 1992 Founders Day Parade in the category of Novelty. currently displayed in the showcase is the trophy also son by the Park and Recreation Coaission Iron the 1991 Founders Day Parade in which they took third place in the same category. Res ectfully submitted, "~~ ~-.'2~ Z 'rry Fu1WOOd, Deputy City Manager/Acting Coaunity Services Director JF/kls 00~2~ l;el'Y UP' HANUHU CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: City Council ' FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk ,~ SUBJECT: DESTRUCTION OF CITY DOCUMENTS it is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). DISASTER PREPAREDNESS BUILDING S SAFETY Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by tha City Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment QDaI~ RESOL7JPION NO. 93-tfi'CJJ A RESOUJi`ICY7 OF 141ti CPFY (A[RiC1:L OF 'ifiE CP1Y OF RANQD CUCNU%JC~.A, CALiFORN7A, AU1fCHiIZIIJG 1fO: DESfRUCTICPI OF CPl'Y RDWPDS AND DOCi24N15 4hIICii ARE NO ILk7GFR REQ[TIRFD AS PROVIDID LT~ER OOVF13rffidl' ODDS SECTION 34090 WEQRFP.S, it has been determined that certain City remrds under the chan3e of the follwirg City Depvctments ate ro lorger requirsi for public or private purposes: DISASTER PRFPAREONESS BUIIDING 6 SAFEPy WFfrRFAS, it has been ~*~^^+'~ that dastruc:tiarr of the above- mentioned aaterials is necessary to conserve storage space, and rerLree staff time, expense, and rontvsim in handling, and informing the public; and 41HIDFA5, Section 34090 of the Government Code of tyre State of California authx:ixes the head of a City department to destroy airy City reootds aryl docampnts which are over two years old ruder his ar her dratge, withant malcirg a copy thereof, after the same are ro lotfger' required, ~ro the approval of the City Ctxurcil bf resolution and the written oacsmnt of the City Attrnrey; and F4RStFAS, it is therefore desirable to destiny said xeoortia as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto aid made apart hereof, in storage, without making a NPl' thereof, wtnidn are over two yeas old; and WHERF7~,.,, said reoorcls have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney. NOW, Rf~E, this City Caarcil of the City of Rancho does herekry resolve as follows: SECCION 1: that approval and authariution Ss hereby given to destroy ttwse reoorcls described as E~ibit "A" attadw3d hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: 'Brat the City Clerk i.a authorizsi to allow examirnation by and donation to the Depaztmerrt of Special Collections of the University Resear'dr Lilsary, University of California, ar other historical society desicpratsd by the City Council, arty of the remxcLs described in Exhibit "A" attadwrl hereto and made a part hereof, except tlloee deemed to be confidential. SECPION 3: Ybat the city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. - f 000028 EXHIBIT "A" DEPARTMENT Building & Safetv RETENTION 2 Years PREPAREDBY/DATE Tonv Russell/I1-3-92 DESCRIPTION OF RECORDS: eZNGLH pAMILY CD8T0H HOMEB 7/87 TO 10/90 ADDRESS 5087 GRANADA CT. 87-4362 10/15/87 10346 HIDDEN FARM 87-3415 07/14/87 10032 MANZANITA 67-2403 08/11/87 10161 WHISPERING 67-6006 11/17/87 9047 ALDER 88-6570 09/27/88 9043 ALDER 88-6569 09/27/88 7404 BERYL 87-8496 07/18/88 7414 BERYL 88-2877 08/24/88 6214 BLUE GUM 87-3928 01/28/88 6271 BLUE GUM 87-3786 06/28/88 10589 BOULDER CYN. 87-3458 10/16/88 5069 BRAMBLE 87-3549 03/14/88 5881 BURLWO00 CT. 88-5441 09/14/88 4926 CACTUS 87-14524 06/21/88 4907 CALICO CT. 87-2042 05/26/88 APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION BY P •N •AD ASST. CITY ATT EY RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION 5096 CALYPSO CT. 87-16049 06/17/88 6236 COLONY CT. 87-9571 02/03/88 5093 EARL 67-15914 11/05/88 9132 GOLDEN 88-8864 11/01(88 9200 GOLDEN 87-12903 04/29/88 5078 GRANADA CT. 87-10788 07/01/88 5097 GRANADA CT. 87-181 08/09/88 10040 HERITAGE LANE 87-2357 01/14/88 8757 HILLSIDE 88-1068 11/28/88 8865 HILLSIDE 87-6588 03/11/88 7851 JADBITE 88-397 09/02/68 8316 LA SENDA 87-7954 01/22/88 8398 LA SENDA 87-15303 10/17/88 8975 MAN2ANITA 88-3783 08/03/88 5740 MAYBERRY 87-10846 06/17/88 6231 PERIDOT 88-1509 08/15/88 5131 MOONSTONE AVE. 87-14226 05/17/88 9122 REALES 87-16092 10/12/88 8436 VICARA 87-7931 08/04/88 5013 VIA VERDE 88-5865 12/09/88 10141 WHISPERING FOREST 87-9479 01/11/88 10378 25TH STREET 87-14664 03/18/88 5225 ALPINE MEADOWS 89-1744 11/30/89 5243 ALPINE MEADOWS 89-1212 12/18/89 6891 AMETHYST 88-12167 05/09/89 6510 ARCHIBALD 89-14079 10/14/89 13047 BLVE GUM 89-1663 11/15/89 8575 BELLA VISTA 89-2932 10/24/89 5086 CARTILLA 88-14745 06/23/89 6224 COLONY 89-2488 07/18/89 5530 CROOEED CREEK 87-14305 01/18/89 5570 CROOKED CREEK 88-4148 12/28/89 4933 DELPHINE PL. 88-4138 09/29/89 5001 EARL CT. 88-5905 05/17/89 5094 EARL CT. 89-0135 11/15/89 5775 EXETER 89-0053 10/05/89 5070 GATEWAY 88-12853 07/12/89 4993 GINGER 88-9520 07/25/89 5096 GRANADA 89-3523 10/06/89 8854 HILLSIDE 89-2312 11/28/89 9871 HILLSIDE 88-7188 11/17/89 10384 HILLSIDE 88-1959 10/10/89 10388 HILLSIDE 88-1961 11/17/89 9003 LARAMZE 89-2251 10/06/89 8947 LARAMIE 88-5185 10/06/89 8244 LA SENDA 88-15554 06/16/89 8302 LA SENDA 88-9896 09/20/89 5043 LOMAS CT. 87-16152 01/02/89 5760 MAYBERRY 88-12603 07/21/89 9108 REALES 88-3398 04/26/89 9172 REALES 88-16242 08/24/89 10534 RIDGE CANYON 87-8806 08/13/89 10204 RING 7461 SCOTT ST. 12988 SHASTA 8797 STRANG LANE 10174 SUN VALLEY DR. 10132 WHISPERING POREST 10147 WHISPERING FOREST 8162 9TH STREET 5075 CALYPSO 5082 CALYPSO 8320 CAMINO SUR 5469 CANISTEL 5042 CASTLE 11082 DEER CANYON 5053 EARL CT. 5761 EXETER CT. 9154 GOLDEN 8822 HILLSIDE 8188 JENNET 8790 KING RANCH RO 8446 LA COLINA 8920 LARAMIE 8975 LARHMIE 9051 LARAMIE 4947 LAREDO PL. 8991 MANZANITA 5780 MAYBERRY 5150 MOONSTONE 8906 REALES 10203 RZNG 5019 SOLITUDE CT. 9714 SUNFLOWER 10128 SUN VALLEY 8490 VICARA DR. 10105 WHISPERING FOREST 10126 WHISPERING FOREST 9071 WILDFLOWER 88-9648 88-5048 88-8827 88-11369 88-9493 68-12468 87-13302 88-3225 89-3524 88-14148 89-5480 89-13550 89-16212 89-12371 89-9498 89-5561 90-1525 89-5838 89-8077 88-16694 89-4107 89-1974 68-16066 87-4168 90-0005 89-7662 89-12394 90-6595 89-4421 88-6744 89-10124 89-9690 89-10744 89-5202 89-2475 88-16006 90-0630 o2/la/a9 10/02/89 08/07/89 03/09/89 04/21/89 06/30/89 05/25/89 10/13/89 01/17/90 04/04/90 02/22/90 05/02/90 10/15/90 04/16/90 04/27/90 02/13/90 DEPARTMENT Admin/Disaster Prep pREPARED By/DATE Tony Russelllll-2-92 RETENTION D/R DESCRIPTION OF RECORDS: Inland Empire Commerce Center 12/17/90 Inventory 6/89 Language (Resources) 10/89 Legislative Bulletin League of Calif. Cities 4/90 Legal Powers "After" Quake 89 Local Emergency Mgmt Organization Hark Stevens Warehouse 9/89 Memberships 6/8B NCCEM Bulletin 8/B8 - 9/8B National Coordinating council 6/88 National Disaster Medical System 6/88 National Guard (Homelsse Sheets) 10/89 APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION BY: ,~ J DEPA THE ASST. CITY A Y RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION O.E.S. Region VI Directory 6/89 O.E.S. Directory Region VI 3/86 - 6/89 Ordinance No. 104 _-~rz~>_ Parks 8/89 P.E.P. Professional Emergency Planners 10/89 City Vehicles 89 Central Cities Sign 3/89 Cable TV Systems 6 Franchises 7/84 - 3/85 B.I. C.E.P. P. 4/88 Balance Sheet 11/87 Auto Maintenance and Repair 1/89 ~ia3ee- April Planning Materials 12/88 Civic Center 5/88 Central Valley Fire District 7/90 ~CRiac-- Check Requests 5/88 Containerized Chemical Disposal 3/90 -Requests Far Computer Assiatanee- Commissiona (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 4/90 county Medical supplisa- Department of Houainq and Comm. Develop. 7/88 Disaster Plan 2/87 Department of Public Health 2/88 S 12/87 Disaster Preparedness Spain e/89 CYA 2/89 Computer Assistance/Service 7/90 - 2/91 cehtra S~Vallry -Pro€essional service 3afl 'Di-eij3~CounEy-Sar -DSspateA-i-nq~. E®erger~ey ordinascee ~- ESP Program 9/89 Expense Reports 11/87 Turfy-$lorea.- Foothiil Fite District 11/87 - 6/88 Fuel System at Ninth street 2/89 - 5/91 General Plan 7/88 Generator Servlce Agreement 2/89 Haz Mat Emergency Response Report 8/87 Health i Safety Committee 4/90 - 5/90 .Inyas Hunt Water Selvage Companies West End Emergency Services Coordinators 7/88 - 9/88 Xerox 6/88 Lets!s Stor It~ Tear Gas 3(87 Tranaparenoiea ~C~ L ~'~' ~- vpland 3/90 Rancho Cucamonga Newsletter 2/89 Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Station 4/88 't3eav9x'>~ Recruitments (Office Assistant 8-16-88) San Antonio Community Hospital 4/88 San Bernardino County 6/89 Service Requests 87 Southern California Gas 8/88 Fr~ct3vB..~"-.ear Psychological Assistance in Disaster 9/86 RACES Report 8/89 Radio committee 2/88 Radiological information 3/Be CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE January 20, 1993 1II Mayor sad Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIELT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE AS SURPLUS TWO G.E. HANDI-TALKIE RADIOS AND CHARGERS AND TO DONATE SAME TO THE INLAND EMPHtE WEST CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN RED CROSS It is recommended [hat the City Council declare as surplus two G.E. Hundi- Talkies serial numbers 040346745 and 121466132 and two G.E. Radio Chargers serial numbers 040549344 and 040549544. It is fuller recommended that the City Couucil donate these items to the Inlaod Empire West Chapter of the American Red Cross. The City has received a request from We Inland Empire Weat Chapter of the American Red Cross for us to donuts our old 30-40 MHz bmd radios to them for use in Neir work. Because the City has recently converted to the new 800 MHz radio system we no longer need the 30.40 MHz radios, moat of which were replaccA four years with the system sve were using just before 800 MHz. As these radios are of no useful value to the City any Icoger and as the American Red Cross provides emergency services end relief to the people of Rancho Cucamonga, it ie recommended that these adios be declared surplus and donated to the Red Cross. ~ectfully Subm~itted,•,~t Dusne A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/dab QOOC35 GP1'Y UN' 1tANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMENDATION i Adoption of Resolution 91-012K extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BACKGROUND The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to ensure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. Respectfully submitted, f ~A t, f SV Micke / `~ Management Analyst I SM:dk Attachment OOOC36 RE901ATION NO. 91-0121( A REiOLU11QJ OF THE CPIY COfRiCII. OF 141E CITY OF RANGED QICAFDNGA, CAISFOHI7IA, EMP@aING NIA11Y OF SAN BIIIIUItiDIIdD IRANCfQSE LICENSE NTll1 OIIMAST CABiE T.V. FOR 90 ~fYS UFON E%PIRATiON OF QIISiIIJf LICENSE WPi4@! THE CITY OF RAN(ND CUCAELNC+A 4hIERFA.S, the Fian~ise LioenSe granted to Camca6t Cable T.V. by the Canty of San >~*~++airo and gratdfathexed inn the City of ~n Clx~orga will expire on Janlaty 30, 1993 and 4dIF~A.S, negotiations are ongoing between the City of Rand~o Cucamcxga arcl GUOCa~^t Cable T. V. ~ and YFR~RFAS, all terms and wndi.tions of the asrent license will continue the same. NOW, THFFEFORE, the City ~mcil of the City Of imr#b Qlc,.>IDanEga does hereby resolve to extad the FYanxjii`e License for 90 days after the expiration of the asrent Canty of San Befnardino License. 000037 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Maya and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Directs SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE REQUEST BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO WAIVE CITY FEE5 IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ANNUAL BUS;:.r'SS AND COMMUNITY EXPO The City Council waive the City fees in conjunction with the annual Chamber of Cotmnerce's Business and Community Expo. The City has received its annual request from Danielle Watson, Executive Dtrecta for the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Cotttmeree, to waive the City fees in connection with the Business and Community Expo to be held on May 15 and 16, 1993 at the Terra Vista Town Center. The Chamber is respectfully requesting the City fees be waived as the Expo is viewed as a joint community venture betwun the Chamber and the City promoting the area's business climate. The specific amounts to be waived aR as follows: Business License (2,080.00 Building and Safety S 48.50 Planning S 119.00 TOTAL 52,24950 000038 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP. STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. ONeil, City Engineer BY: Jo Lynne Russo-Pereyre, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT': CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE REVISIONS UPDATING THE EXISTING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PERMIT FOR THE MID-VALLEY SANITARY LANDFILL The City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the revisions updating the existing San Bernardino County permit for the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The purpose of these revisions are necessary because this is a San Bemarttino County facility currently operating with an outdated Solid Waste Facility Permit. The initial permit was granted on October 11, 197E and the San Bemardino County Solid Waste Depamrrent is in the process of updaing that permit The permit must be updated per [he requirements of Assembly BiB 2296 and the Public Resources Code (PRC) 50000 which provides that the establishment of a new Y[ expanded solid waste facility be detemtined by review and approval of the Board of Supervisors, and a majority vae of rho majority of the Cities/towns within the County having a majority of the iricorporated population. This is accomplished'oy the approval of the attached Resolution. The San Bernardino County Solid Waste Ilepartment is proposing to expand the capacity of the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill due to the closure of Milliken Sanitary Landfill. The revisions will include the development of the final grading plans which will enable a more precise estimate of future site capacity and site life of the Landfill. A09~YHI3 The Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill is located in the City of Rialto. The facility consists of two parcels totalling approximately 142 acres and an additional five aces used for ancillary facilities (recycling and landfill gas Flan). The rate of disposal has substantially increased since the permit was originally issued for the Facility. Revisions to the permit will consider increased tonnages due to increases in population growth and the potential diversion of half of the waste disposed of at the Milliken Sanitary Landfill. The Milliken landfill is scheduled for closure this year. Although it is undetermined which landfill will receive waste diverted from the Milliken landfill, allocation of one-half of the daily waste load to the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill permits a conservative impact analysis. QQa~1u.~ Maya am Members of the ary Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Mid-VaOty Sanitary Lard6ll January 20, 1993 Page Two staff has spoken with the City of Rialto ana been advised the Rialro City Council ate not opposed ro the expansion of the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The Ciry of Riatro has requested the San Berrtmdino Solid Waste Departmea[:eview the envi:anmental land use issues with Rialro and these discussions have been ioitiatod. Staff has also spoken with Tmr Trujillo of the County's Environmental Health services Department and been advised drat the cities of Monrolav, Uphud, Redlands, Big Bear Lake, and Apple Valley have approved Readutioos in favor of the revisions. Mr. Trujillo indicated those cities not responding ro the County's requested action are deemed ro have approved the proposed revnsrons. As the City Council is aware, the continuing requirements of AB 939 enacted in October of 1989 require local jurisdictions ro provide enhanced Lnndtill opacity where necessvey as efforts ro develop alternative methods fa disposal and clan are level City of Rancho Cucamonga lies within the "West End" of anS Baaardino CA ty and udhzes both the Milliken std Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfills. The proposed expansion of the Mid-Valley Santary Landfill provides another option fa the Gty's contract haulers in the disposal of Rancho Cutxmonga's refuse. Respectfully 'tted, William ]. eil City Engineer 000040 RESOIl7PION ~. `f 3 -d0~o A RESOIIATON OF '1F0; C1TY OURiCII. OF 'Dffi CPFY OF RAN(}IO CUCAM2I(~A, APP%7JING RE/ISIONS UPpAI'QiG 'lf~ E1QS1itiG SAN Bk13F~imIIJJ CO[II7FY PIId'IIT FS%2 'III MID-VALLEY SANITARY LANDFILL WHEREAS, the Mid-Valley Sanitary landfill is an existing, San Ber7~ardua County refuse disposal facility operating under pezmit sircx 1978; and WHEREAS, the operating Solid Waste Facility Permit (SWFP) , arigi~lly issue] on Octobas 11. 1978 is arrrently outdated; and WHERAS, the San Bernardino County Solid Waste mlw,r~.,r (S{dID) , acting as the Ia3d Agency, with corxasrelYY? fzrm the San Bernuxdiro Canty Planning Departnent as the San Bernazziim Canty Board of Supervisor's designated Erniraroental Lead Agency, will duly ornplete a Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFY) application; arc] WHl]iiFAS, said SWFP is only issued for the revision and the updating of the facility's operations, includircg all current Regulatory Agercies' requirafents; arc] WHEREAS, this facility can continue to provide the San Bernardino Canty SFL•ID a method of disposing of mrnicipal solid wastes, inert wastes, aryl ran-hazardaLS solid wastes; aryl WHERFA.S, Public ResouroPS Ocde 50000 r,o~n+l*~ that the "Site Identification and Description" of a new ar expanded solid waste facility whidr has not beer ider+tified or des¢ibel in a Canty Solid Waste ~ Plan (COSFd~) lust be approved or disapproval by the mw+ty Board of S~ervisors, and by a majority of the Cities/Resins within the County having a majority of the inxxuporatal populatiai; and WHEREAS, the Canty Departiwnt of EYrviramental Health Servioss/Itxal Enfortat~t Agency (LEA) Program is the Regulatory Resporcible Agency for the project entrusted to issue the SWF Permit with ~uxenoe provided~frrm the California Integrated Waste Maraga~rnt Board (CI4d9B) ; and WHEREAS, provided that the mrditions of the permit. ate amQlied with, there is ro substantial evidence in the record that there Will lie one ar more significant adverse imxicts gbtl jn the Citv's bcurclaries for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Canty Oeparm~it of EmironmeMZl Health Services Will prnoess the SWFP application aocordircg to provisions as provided in CBQA, dll applicable Local/ State/ Federal Ragulatiore, 'Bie San Bernardino CUUTtty Development Code and/ or General Plan standards; and NOW 2fE, BE TT RE90LVID that the City council of the City of Raraho CuCVtprga, Canty of San Bernardino, State of California, hereby approves the revisiore updating the existing San Bernardino Calory P~7111t for the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. ~ ' l 0®Q©41 Cfl'Y UN' ti.ANCriO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE January 20, 1993 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIECI': APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS IN SOUTH ETIWANDA TO COVER CONSULTANT COSTS ASSOCIATED Wfl'H A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AS REQUESTED BY PROPERTY OWNERS RF.COMMRNDATtON It is r.:commended that the City Council approve the reimbursement agreement with thirty two property owners in South Etiwande who have requested us to investigate Ne possibility of an asxssment district. BACKGROUND Certain property owners in south Etiwanda have asked the City to form an assessment district to finance the design and construction costs of master planned drainage facilities. Tht area in question is shown on the attached map. Before asking the City Council to form an assessment district Ne City needs to retain several consultants to study the feasibility of the project. Per Cily policy, we are requiring the proponents to pay for all of the consultant costs, The reimbursement agreement before the Council sets forth the manner in which the property owner's money is deposited with the City and how it is to be reimbursed from bond proceeds should an assessment district be formed. The City Council is under no obligation to form a district and the agreement specifically reserves for the City the right to abandon chest proceedings without having to reimburse funds already spent. As this agreement will help this project move forward without obligating the City, slat( is recommending approval. Respectfully ~~~~Suggggb''''m~~~~i~~tted, Wane A. Bake Assistant to the City Manager DAB/dab Q®QQ42 ou~msw~ert: ovxmort ~ dry" _,.... _~_ ._.,,. .._ UQpo43 ....,. .~....,.._ ,_ PROPOSED ASSESSI~EM DISTRICT - CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coundl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGARDING MUNICII'AL COURT FINES The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been party to a lawsuit against the County of San Bernardino regarding fines and forfeitures. Fourteen cities have joined together against the County for reimbursement of municipal mart fines and forfeitures that have been retained by the County in violation of Penal Code Section 1463. A summary judgement on the issue of liability was issued in favor of the cities. The County has since appealed, but the court also held in the dties's favor. While an additional appeal has been pending, the County and the sties have mutually agreed upon a methodology for determining the amount of fines to be reimbursed to each dty. FINDINGS The law firm of Meyers, Nave, Riback and Silver have represented the fourteen cities in their lawsuit against the County of San Bernardino. A preliminary settlement agreement has been drafted which would pay to the fourteen titles a specific amount of municipal court fines collected from March I, 1985 through January 31, 1990, plus Interest. The agreement was reached after it was determined that the amount of dollars to be distributed to each city was relatively consistent wit.i that projected to be received by each city, even after the appeal hearing, assuming that the cities won the case. Accordingly, both the dries and the county have opted to avoid further costs in litigation through the proposed settlement. The City of Rancho Cucamonga would receive $297,899.32. All cities party to the lawsuit have been asked to adopt a resolution approving the settlement agreement. A copy of the resolution is attached, along with the settlement agreement. 000044 CTCY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGARDING MUNICIPAL COURT FINES January 20, 1993 Page 2 RECOMME_~!DATION It is recommended that the City Counay adopt a resolution approving a settlement agreement between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and authorize the Mayor to sign seventeen copies of the agreement signature page. Respectfully submitted, i / ~~ . Do ng~iez Administrative Services Director RCD/dah attachments DoM J Resolution No. 93-~~7 A RESOLUTION BY AND BETNEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE TREASURER OF SAN BERNARDI ND COUNTY, AND THE AUDITOR OF SAN BERNARDI NO COUNTY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING MUNICIPAL COURT FINES WHEREAS, the City is party to a lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court entitled Vic to rville, et al.. v. San Bernardino County, et al ., Action No. 358193; and WHEREAS, the parties to said lawsuit are desirous of settling; and HHER EAS, a Settlement Agreement for settlement of Action No. 358193 has been presented to the City Council, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council is familiar with the contents of the Settlement Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council approves the "Settlement Agreement By and Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, the County of San Be rna rdfno, the Treasurer of San Bernardino County, and the Auditor of San Bernardino County, and authorizes and d!rects the Mayor to sign the same. V 11 0~~~6 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE TREASURER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, THE AUDITOR OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, AND CERTAIN CITIES OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY i, pAR22E8. The parties to this Agreement are the Cities oP victorville, Adelanto, Barstow, Biq Bear Lake, Chino, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, Upland, Highland and Ban Bernardino (hezeafter referred to collectively as "Cities^), the County of San Bernardino (hereafter referred to as "County"), the Treasurer of San Bernardino County (hereafter referred to as "Treasurer"), and the Auditor oP San Bernardino County (hereafter referred to as "Auditor"). i. PORpoEE. A leweuit was tiled in the Sacramento County Superior Court entitled cir_v of yic~orvi~le et al va County of San Bernardino. et ate. (NO. 358193) wherein the Cities, excepting the Cities of Highland and San Bernardino, alleged that the County, the Treasurer, and the Auditor had failed to dis- tribute to Cities, pursuant to Penal Coda $ 1463, their share of the fine revenues collected from defendants convicted of misde- meanors in the San Bernardino County Municipal Courts and placed on conditional sentence (also referred to as "court" probation and/or "summary probation"). Said ravenuea are hereinafter referred to as "Pines." Cities moved succeastully Por summary judgment on the issue of liability and a writ of mandate and summary judgment on liability issued. Tha ordare ware affirmed on the County's appeal. Tha newly created City oP Highland became, by its motion, a plaintit! in the leweuit. The purpose of this Agreement is to finally and fully raeolve all o! the issues and claims between the pnrtiea in Action No. 758193 currently pending in the Sacramento Superior Court. A further leweuit alleging as above was filed by the MY PtP.AORPPANll1' ivam ^«.iarn City of San Bernardino entitled City of San Berns*dino v Co of San Bernardino -~., Riverside Superior Court Case No. 207900. 1n that case, the County stipulated to a judgment substantively identical to that obtained by other cities. Thus, the purpose of this Agreement also includes final and full resolution of all claims and issues between the parties in action No. 207900 currently pending in Riverside Superior Court. 3. E/1PECT]:VE DATE. The effective date of this Agree- ment is the last date it is executed by any party. 4• The lawsuits referenced in paragraph 2 do not involve fines collected by the San Bernardino County Municipal Courts from defendants who pay their fines directly to the municipal or justice courts, which fines are currently being, and will continue to ba, distributed by County to Cities as provided in penal Code $ 1463.001 et. seq., without any collection fee. 5. 110 ADMIB82om. This Agreement is not end shall never be considered to be an admission of any fault, error, wrongdoing, or liability by the County, the Treasurer, the Auditor, or by any agent, officer, servant, or employee of any oP them. 6. RACE 1ImE REVIINEB. County will pay to Cities the total sum of three million nine hundred twenty-four thousand three hundred seventy-tour and 10/100 dollars ($7,924,374.10) in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in paragraph 8. This sum is comprised of two million nine hundred sixty-six thousand fifty-seven and 46/100 dollars ($2,966,057.46) tine amounts and nine hundred fifty-eight thousand three hundred sixteen and 64/100 dollars ($958,316.64) interest, which is estimated at seven percent (7t) to January 4, 1997. (This amount is referred to as "back fine revenues" in this Agreement.) The amounts paid pursuant to this Agreement are in settlement o! the lawsuits referred to in paragraph 2 and may be treated by each city as settlement proceeds. lAII P~PSORPF.MPnT 1711M91 Dx.IOnP 7. AP POR2IODHlLD1T OP BACE DIME R1:V8NO E8. The sum of three million nine hundred twenty-Pour thousand three hundred seventy-four and 10/100 dollars ($3,924,374.10) shall be appor- tioned among the Cities as follows: City Peroenteae ~ Adelanto .62 $ 24,476.42 Barstow .4i 15,960.46 Hig Bear Lake .05 1,895.90 Chino 5.36 212,000.61 Colton 8.94 351,278.87 Fontana 11.24 439,267.64 Grand Terrace 1.18 46,296.47 Highland .93 37,089.55 Montclair 4.45 174,295.58 Ontario 13.63 537,683.95 Rancho Cucamonga 6.14 241,660.99 Redlands 1.73 67,443.15 Rialto 5.12 200,297.72 San Bernardino 31.33 1,225,601.39 Upland 6.97 274,298.79 Victorvil.le 1.90 74,826.61 The percentages set forth in this paragraph apply only to the back fine revenues and to the interest provided for in paragraph 10. s, pA2 HACL PEQIOD. The back line revenues (three million nine hundred twenty-four thousand thzae hundred seventy- four and 10/100 dollars ($3,924,374.10)) shall be paid to Cities over the following "pay back period" and apportioned among the Cities according to the percentages in paragraph 7, above: (a) $400,000.00 on or before one montR from Lhe last party's execution of this Agreement; (b) $600,000.00 during Fiscal Yaar 1992 - 1993 (FY 1992-93) by one payment by the and of FY 1992-97, if necessary, so that a minimum of $1,000,000.00 1~N PlP.AOlPEMmR 11n49f Dot.le]9 is paid during FY 1992-93; (c) $1,000,000.00 during Piscal Year 1993-1996 (FY 1993-94) by one payment by the end of said Fiscal Year; (d) The reminder by a final payment by the end of Fiscal Year 1994 - 1995 (FY 1994-95). County may pay more than the above amounts in any fiscal year. 9. COLLECTIOa FaE. County will retain a collection fee of ten percent (lot) of fine revenues collected Prom defendants on conditional sentence and distributed to the cities pursuant to Penal Code S 1463.001, which shall be in addition to the County's statutory share (Penal Code S 1463.002) of summary probation collections. Tha loi is a collection fsa and is not intended to be an adjustment of the statutory percentages set forth in Penal Code $ 1463.002. The collection Pee will apply to distributions of tine revenues collected subsequent to the County's execution of this Agreement. The collection !ee shall be in addition to the fee for processing installment accounts as provided in Penal Code S 1205(6). 10. IaTLREBT. The back tine revenues of three million nine hundred twenty-four thousand three hundred seventy-four and to/ioo dollars (53,924,374.10) include accrued interest estimated at seven parcant (7t). it is understood and agreed by the parties that exact interest calculation would ba extremely burdensome because statutory intareet accrues from the and of the month Following each payment on each account, and the parties therefore agree to accept the estimate below. Additional intareet will accrue altar the date the County executes this Agreement, at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) rate or seven parcant (7t), whichever is lower, throughout the duration of this Agreement, on amounts paid pursuant to paragraph 8. Tha LAIP rate will ba calculated by averaging the three (7) most recent quarters' LAIF rata evailabla lA11 PIP.AdRPL' ffNT IYSIM ~.Id79 at the time a payment is made. 11. LOTDRE FINEB. All fines collected by County from defendants on conditional sentence whose court orders era received by County on and after September 1, 1989, shall be distributed to Cities according to the percentages sat forth in Penal code S 1463.002, or such percentages ae may in tl~e future be listed by Penal Code S 1463.002 or its successor. ('ounty agrees to prorate payments in accordance with Penal tale g 1462.5; provided, however, that if the proration statu~:ory provisions are amended or repealed, County may adjust its procedures in accordance with the statutory changes re Latad to proration without necessity of any amendment to this A~lreament. 12. DIBMI88AL. Within thirty days of thn ettective date of this Agreement, Cities shall Tile a dismissal with prejudice as to all defendants in city of Victorvilla. et al. va. County oP San Bernardino. et al., Sacramento County Superior Court Nc. 358197 and City of San Bernardino vs. County of San Bernardino. et al., Riverside County Superior Court No. 207900. 13. CO8T8. Each party shall bear its own coats and attorney's fees. 14. ~jpDIYICATZOmB. Th1s Agreement may DB modified only by a written instrument executed by all parties hereto. 15. $aj,,y~@g, Each and every city who is a party to this Agrnement, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby releasae and dischargna the County o! San Sernardino, the Auditor of San Bernardino County, the Treasurer of San Sernardino Ccunty, and their otlicer ;, employees, agents, successors, descendants, dependents, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, Lrom all causes of action, claims, demands, damages, and liabilities of any kind, whether known or unknown, now existing or hereafter arising from the Latta and circumstances set Lorth in the petition end complaint, as amended, in sacramanto Supnrior Court Action No. 358193 and Riverside Superior Court Action No. 27900. NN PIF.~ORm'1a'NNF ILnlI3 ae;.lOn9 16. BASE YEAR CALCOLATION. County warrants that each City's base year calculation amount Por Fiscal Year 1990 - 1991 shall reflect the full amourt of fine revenues attributable to each city pursuant to the parcentagea set forth in Penal Code S ia6~. 0o1 et seq. Thies warranty is made for the express purpose of compliance with Chapter 189 of Statutes, 1991, and tot no other purpose. 17. DBPLIGTE ORIOIIALa. This Agreement is executed in (17) duplicate originals so that each party will have an original of this Agreement. COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO DATED: Hy: Cha rman, Hoar of Superv sots ATTEST: EARLENS SPROAT, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ey: Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: ALAN K. MARKS County Counsel By: SVSAN A. HOPKINS Deputy County Counsel DATED: THOMAS P. O'DONNELL Treasurer-Tax Collector of County of San Bernardino DATED: ERROL T. MACKZUM Auditor/Controller-Recorder o! County of San Bernardino us rerwamw~rt Ivan oveaan Pages 7 through 22 of this agreement are not included as they only contain signature pages for the following cities: Adelanto Barstow Bi Bear Lake ~ Chino ton Co Fontana Grand Terrace Highland Montclair Ontario Rancho Cucamonga Redlands Rialto Upland Victorville San Bernardino Ut'1'Y VF' 1SANUHV CUCAMUN(iA STAFF REPORT DATE January 20, 1993 7D Mayor sad Members of the City Couocil lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SLTB]ECT: APPROVAL TO EXECITIE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEb1ENTS FOR l.'ONSULTANTS IN RELATION TO A REQUEST BY PROPERTY OWNERS IN SOUTH ETIWANDA TO FORMAN ASSESSMENT' DISTRICC It is recommended that the City Council approve professional services agreements with Brows, Divm & Hentschke, bond counsel, in an amount not to exceed 52,000; with Heldman, Rolapp & Asaocia[ea, financial advisors, in an amount not to exceed 52,000; and with Willdan & Associates, assessment engineers, in an amount not to exceed f16,000. This agreement is to be funded from a deposit made by the properly owners and will not affect the general fund. The property owners in South Etiwanda have asked the City to form an assessment district to finance the cost of design and construction of master planned drainage facilities in the South Etiwanda area. This area is shown on the attached map. Before asking the City Council to form an assessment district, a great deal of data must be reviewed and evaluated to determine if a district is feasible and what type of district should be formed. The agreements before the council at this meeting will bring the necessary expertise on board so that analysis of this proposal can begin. This work is being initiated at the request of the developer and is being paid for by the developer. Once the feasibility study is complete, stalf will bring back the appropriate documents for the City Council's consideration. R~ Submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/dab attachment oooes4 auim a wa ~a m avMmrt 1 PRDPDSED ASSESSIdENT DISTRICT lval a yr nn.vunu uu~~a,av+. vra STAFF REPORT GATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Luanda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO (WARD AND E%ECUTE THE AGREEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR 6ENERAL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 PARKS AND LANDSCAPE SITES TO iMRIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, OF IRwINDALE, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMWNT OF f59,410.00, TO 8E FUNDED BY THE GENERAL FUND ANO LANDSCAPE IANINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 01-4647- 6028 AND 40-4130-6028, RESDECTIYELY. It 1s recommended the City Council award and execute the agreement with Mariposa Horticul Wral Enterprises, Incorporated, of Irwindale, California, for the Maintenance Contract for General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Parks and Landscape Sites. On February t, 1993 the City will begin maintenance of the Sports Complex facility. To provide that service, staff positions will be transferred from General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District 1 area to the Sports Complex. In lieu of recruiting additional personnel, staff recommends contract services be utilized for the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District 1 park areas. Thts will be the first time C11;y parks will be maintained by a landscape contractor. Per previous City Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on MondgY, November 30, 1992. Mariposa Hortlcul Wral Enterprises, Incorporated was the lowest responsible bidder (bid summary attached). Staff has reviewed a)1 bids and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Nhen the bids were received on November 30, 1992, staff felt they were somewhat low. Staff contacted the contractor and quest/oned Mariposa regarding this issue. Mariposa responded they are very comfortable with the cost of the contract and followed up with written conflrwetton (see attached letter). IL should be noted, this contract 1s for 5 months only but can be extended on a year to year basis. The contract Drovldes for yeariy increases based on the C.D.I. only as applied to each item of work listed in the spetlficatlons. QO(~t'.~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT W1INT CONTRACT January 20, 1993 Page 2 The City's park maintenance crews have always had an excellent rapport Mth the publle. One of the concerns with using a contractor 1s how this rapport would be affected. To help alleviate this concern, the specifications in the contract require the contractors staff to wear uniform shirts Mth naves and phone numbers on thus so anyone can identify them. Staff M11 conduct training sessions for the contractor's crews to learn to interface Mth the public and a Field Supervisor is required to be on site at all tines. The contractor's crews Mll be supervised by a City maintenance staff saber and City facilities crews M17 still be at the various park sties from time to tine for naJor repairs. The contractor is under a new contract to provide park maintenance services to the City of lake Forest and Mariposa's contract costs arc in line Mth what that agency M11 be paying for similtar services. Me no:e Msrlposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, 1s currently one of two landscape contractors working for the City awlntalning median islands, parkways and paseos throughout the City. Mariposa has provided excellent service to the City and we expect they M11 provide the same excellent service to our City parks. Staff M11 report back to City Council in six months Mth a status report on the contract maintenance. If things 9o well we anticipate reeammending extension of the contract in fiscal year 93/90. This M11 provide us with a full years growing cycle when making recommerMatlon for furtAer use of tontraet operations throughout the City. Respectfully subm C /~/?~. William J. O'Neii City Engineer ~ NJO:LEH:dIw Attachments QOOO.ar"7 V1 a w ~~~~~~a ~n~~ g 888888 8 888 8 , °°~~R~ ~ ~~~ ~ 5 .. w Y p p p p p p ~ O O O O O O pp p p p O O O Q pppppp a p 3 ~ ~ ~ tp. t~ ;[ Q~ ryRp 4 u f N w y j ~ 1 ~ ~1 ~ ~+ a 9 i-1 p 8 O p p O O y ~ ~/j ap Vyj n T ~ OVO [~ ~ ~ !o'~ ti ~ ~ ` F f yy~~ rzy Vl Y^ N ~ N i m p N N fm`I ti m P .C G G~' ~/1 H N L ~ ~ U ~` 9' d y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O .~a++ ~ °` '~ ~ o 0 ~ ao.~0.FO~. ~0.§F~, a~~$d63 ~~3~ F oooes8 a~ W a0 0. M ~ R 1 l' O `~ !~ H O R T I C U L T U R A L E IJ T E R P 12 I S E S I IJ C December 11, 1992 To: Polr. Jeff Barnes Coy of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Bax 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Maintenance contract for the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District 1 Parks 8 Landscaped Sites. Dear JeH, This letter is in response to your concern over our unit prices as stated in our proposal of November 30, 1992. Please allow me to explain the procedure we use to arrive at these figures. When we begin the bid process, we look at the entire contract as one job rather than 9 different jobs and locations. We then calculate all necessary labor, equipment and materials to perform the work exactly as stated in the specifications. When we arrive a[ a total price, each site is then given a value based on the specific requirements and total area for that particular site. Once we have a total price for each Site, That price is broken down proportionately into the bid items provided. II is at this point that we pay less attention to detail. Ultimately, some or the prices may be somewhat disproportionate compared to what you would normally think it should cost. Res[ assured that all requirements in the specifications and special provisions have been met and Mariposa intends to perform these tasks precisely as outlined. We have been fulfilling contracts like These to many years and feel comfortable with the price we have proposed. We hope this will help to alleviate any apprehension you may have about our ability to execute this contract. If you have any further questions, please feel Tree to call. Thank you, /~ ~~ Richard den ri, Estimator c"~ .G;fO :,l'I;".l nn'.I,:''.. Ir •:'l1U/I~ !'A'.~'I°, (;,1 ldl l!C'".\IF (;~~IIII'~~~'It'I"Ir. I~I'~li' ^in IfL ?In. ::q.nl:n /~.'~'nlnn.^, ~I. ul r QOn C~7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 70: Mayor and Members of the C14y CourH:11 Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AIARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR SIERRA MADAE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM NINTH STREET TO CNAFFEY ALLEY, A CpMINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (COBG) PROGRAM 1001 FEDERALLY FUNDED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TD EASTLAND CONSTRUCTION, INCORDOINTED, FOR THE AMOUNT OF f98,762.00 ((89,783.70 PLUS lOf CONTINGENCY). RECd~E10AT10N IL 1s recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution, the contract for Sierra IMdre Avenue Street Improvement Protect to the lowest responsive bidder, Eastland Construction, Inc., for the mount of (89,783.70 and authorize the Administrative Slrvlees Director to expend f9B,762.00 (f89,783.70 plus lOt contingency), to be funded from Account No. 26-4333-9124. BM3I6ROUMD/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, 61ds were solicited, received and opened on December 1, 1992, for the subject pro3ect. Eastiand Construction, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of (89,783.70 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estlmste was (136,139.05. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found thain to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investtgatlon end finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submi , _~~,~ Ni111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:LAB:Iy Attachment cc: Purchasing 0QCC60 .~~ e$RSSt8S8888$88~8~ppppp$pp~~8ppp$pNQp8pp°8~yy8,888pp8pp$Nf~88$$8888~ ~p• Q~MyrNyOyOOymWQO~y~ON~Ny ~`~~ORa N O p MM p S Q y y H H NN N N N N N H H N H E :J e Z 8p.99p=$p$p$y~8888Q88388895°,VeGeV8~~8pp988888$ ~_. >•4 $NNNNO~N NNH~V{NHNN~HN~N~„N~00 N p p pp p p p pp gq pp pp pp p p pp pN pN .~i e3~$i. Q8`S~SBHGHO HHHHHT, ~.y'G,$HOHH'OH SAO Gj $RE cF~ U,"2 a~J,y3i,Y,ay~€9y~~y o^a~°v~~~NZi~»~. ~fye ~i5T5 < >y $pCRp$8~8~Cp8 Q8 SS888y8y~~8Oq8~~~°yy ~9y~5,88~8p 8~Q8 p$88~R~J/ p8p Z U1Y~ ~'. 4HHHMH~NNLSN ~NNNN~N HYfNHH~Np ~•~ii ~ ~ _ `''NOOK N N VV II Ypf ~N~1i ~O({~i~10 3ya^3~y S$5~yy$~~$pnp aQ$$8$ $$$$$pNYnY $p¢mnj,88 pRQ4Q8~V80~O$S $8$8$Si Z~=~ 44`11 y~ N~if ~i NNN~ ~i ~1 N ~H NNriN ~l 4~~~ ~ 8O~8~(8.~8~888e8~.89~ryx.~~8S888s8888S8_8884' F N~~ ~~. 'K~NN~F~' ~yR~Yri ~NHNN~HHHH~OHN~~O( r, ~ fO^ H IHI V~ N i3 l' p ~y ~ ~~~hMP~H~~of~+H~C1~.r.8 H1~.. '$N~.~ .Ti Z : .`~i°~s$$~iu~lu~4~~~55`a` L~~.i'v`!u~'a` "J °Ju~y`.j`.`~`~' `3`-~ n ~ e ~ z ~ ~~~ ~ ~ .,'" a s~ a AF ~~ ~~u F ~~C ~tl, ~ ~d~~ ~~~~ ro rF ~evi tl 7~ GG ~U~tl~$ uuuu, ~U ~~~~~~~~~aasav~~~ ~~~ 000061 8$(8(VV8~pp8ppv$v~~8$p$p~$$$pmp8y~8pp88pp$oo8$y~~$8~p8p8 e ~NO~OSNH Nip PN ~Op ttO{Q~Qy800 V~yN~~NH ' y1yH O0y V~CI~rNWy~~p NrrH''RR ~,VVOO1I ffVV ~/fN~HVVVMI J< N~ inNH yHHNNN HN ~H N H C < < ~' > yUy ~~ o~f ~~~$ U6~= ~o~,~ ~ < ~ y{~ y, ~' < Li O y Q ~ u <~ ~~ VJ y FS Z rz N ~.. F a F~ 0 9~ m 8pp<ON8N$88$S8S85tn_8OV8~8g88Q8Q5?8~~~.jj88~pp88 ~• '1~MNHyHHNHHNNNMH8NNH~il ~yN~~ N VV~~ pN p p ppV~ v~ Cppp~[ pp .~ SNS~NHHHH 8$$$'b', 3i "e~8OO,00uRH$P,O$ ~~ ~~sR~a~~~~~~°~~~~~~~~y~€q$ pppp N ^ E4 3i A ~ yH H N H N N y y N N H H N M 0 RCp4'A.'~-,8ry8ry$$F8Ymm9'dSTidE,YryJ.e'a,p888y$~18~~p"85ryrySvve'j ~Q8{ <'. HNHy~OHyN~N`~NHLYN+N~NM~~Ny VG ~~~iiiN ~` N N MN HHHFgH$p,H $gHH$r'Oh$O$$HN$S$S$C y~} ~~~~73~~~~~~~~B~P$~„~N~~~~v11 ~4~ryV~N~' p v y H N N M M N H N N N M H y H H N L)N ~ Vv~f pp Vv~fp Qy~p pp ppppppp p` 8$tdJ $lV$$00 4l`~HO V1 ~N{~T{tIHV~,ON$OOpV V0~00g~Oy ?. O, ~iSHN r~[~~yN y31 HiS YSN ~^HiMNHfr~' NN~N~H oO N H ,~jNNVi(J Y7WW~~~d .J .I VIHNGI ~J ~.71iiN ~.JH.i ~i ~~ ~ o H ~. ~ a ~ ~~~3 ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ '3~~p~ ~~~~~~~ L!Ci ci~'~Y °tlpC ~' 'tl ~~~~~~~4~~~~ada4~~~~.~~~~ 000062 s 88$8p~88$8888888$818Y4RSS(p8y~5y~8~8$8H8888p$p~~8p p8p 8p 88(~ y0 yn VN11~~1CQ~P~~~N..py (YONN Nf~I ~Oy~~1y~p~rO ON N~~O t~ ~yy ~ /i IIHYY N H N H N y N N N N H y N y N N N N~ N N N H H VVNIIE ptip p vv~~ p p p p p p QQ p p p p p pp p p p p p pQp pp pp p O SN HHHHHHGjHHHH~NIN~,HHHSHVf c,HNgH ~Q 4p 1~1 r1 Vf app MN y~NgNN~ pee mm ~~pp m N H H N^ H N N H N Nf N N M N~ N NNN N`~ P N N i v N H N HHHNNN 1~ py ..pp p g pQ p pp o p p p pp p pp p QN pp op Hp p Hf~1~m OC. gHry~HH~O?~HHHQ H~R R~q HHV [~ H N N N N H N N N m~ N~ ~ N N N N N N y E ~~ ~ N H N H ~ f~ ~ p G pp CC ep CC CC CCp o pp ep pQC GGGp < ~{y}}y{ii77 ~ pp~CQ~va p~prrB~$S$~~/;~OFPwNi,~g,F,~((OgO CCa p4p ~g~`j{{N ggQ`j' ..QSQ~{{ C ~ifi ~~• ;jHH~I HyNHHNH~~IXNNNANM~yy "N •i1 !qs ~_ '~pHRlp p p p g p p p p pp p p p C p pH ~`~'f17Q OgO1H~, g~40gOgOO Q1N~, `~fN~,00,0$~N~q~OS~ y'~j~=~ A• NN E~NHy~ NN y Y~y NHHNN~ 4p`Z Vi ~ i yF p p GGC Ge cc p pCCC pepCp 4~<~ w $epp~, Ot~~OeyV,00y~~00ptqq~`pOp N1((~~~, (P(..~~~~IHy~y,O Vf00S Q~Q00000 ~~~.Ti 1 M~NHNN QW~ryQeQNN~NNN~~ ~~H $N8S F'J=i g'w1 ~~7 ~ N Nily~gN NN ~N~N~ v~fN 0t0i V ~F ~ d N N H L!'M x ~ b y Z ' „y,7 v18S~U~~~~~~S.iH~Hy,.7 ,.7~yvbi~~y~~ M C a~ 3~ .~ci~Fvad^ 3tl giB~S~ ~J tl ~~ ~44u ,~Ettye ~~cc~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ QF }y5yr!<$ss$$gbyyb J ><L~ UU, GJ CJ~b 94 '$g ~qy gay OUZ VKE~~~~~uCi~0.bi6V~V~~~~RFQ ~C mui ~ 1U1~ Se' aF~o aaccsa .Y QHQ NOp P,SSG{HO;O OIq~1, O(py~ ~`NQQ 9NH8Q g~QHQQH VNj QQO `O ~O~°°,,GON 5~ ~Sy$y~~o,.yT.~~~~1~~$mQoN ZS N~VN1~10 y'JVC `~r~y~y~Tj,~v~~ N N N N N N H~ N N M y y Vl H N N N H O Z ~ ppp p ppppV pey~p pip ppap p p p8p pp~cO GC ~!vOfS~O;~'1~1pr~1,~N((V~~ff~'000Qfp~~pO pNpO~N~O _. CJNHN~~HHNNNyNMy~N8Ny~Hy~8~NFH `h NHN M ~Nf N vN N00~~ N $F3$~8.$$8$~~$$~$~8$88.8fi8$$$8& 4 g~~ ~_ gggg~g~~ < 2s ~~o.mG~~~N4$~oq- F "~i ~$~TNAIi [~ ~ ~< y A N N N N y y N~ F~ N y N N N N N E h7 OL V .~ 4 p < ~~ s 8~$~~$BS~~Qggw~,gQ g888s8gg~8 (' O~ '~1 Npp f~l ~~myf yV~I yV~IT RRTTf~I/ f~fp Vl V1G O~'^ Z~L '~.. t~NHNNyNNy~NVlNNNN yN V~V18NNH~ F~~fS or N YNI x ~~$SQqq w p ~v~+70 ~ $88ng88~ ~3888n$~$$ Q' ~$$8$$~ Z~=O M~ NvNf~ NH ON He f~` yy~~ NCp /M~~pN QQHp ypOp NNN ~Yf` ~f~~ 8pNp8f~`,8y8~O$CG,QGQ,8pN~8QNryNc1Oryjlry~f~V,8~Ig$g8$8$588888Q Fy~M _. 8NyNNN1Myy~VQI ~MNNNNN~NN~VO~NN(~a U ~{F- N ty` N Vf N NL~ s Z ? JyvnlhU~1 ~+7{y~~~..J ..7NtiS ViW J.i .+W rail .i .JN.l ..1 ~ a ~ ~ o ~~}} N C ~ ?~ ~ u H ~+a3~ 3q~~ 6y~i~~ae~~~tl tl Fr Y 7<Vd~9~ ~UOG1~~V~~r~ ~ ~~ <~ > '~ GUNGCZ 6, Y 9 ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~ m~ E 11 ~• ~~s ~:1 jj j ~eJ'tjyiJ ~:iw.i..^.~.~. Sj'.J.'~'~..^..~. .~.AF ~1~A'~~~i OOCG64 8n,~aj g~G4p HQ'~I~!Opq Hy HpH~HN~O Fryry OSSO pH 8H H!pOp Hpp p~p Hpp Hpp yOy _y~.1 fn ~MpH~~t.V~•i~~'Sf ~P~rp p~, .rp Nt..n <O-~O(NV N[Cp1 NUNpf p eC y H H N N N » y N NP N M H y H H N N N N N N '`KHtN H- Jc U ~ gry8$8Q8889,8889.,v$i^-gS'ig8ga$$~88 '•'~ pp }IVI~~1N ~D lV 1~VmI O ~~yy N.~ OV~+88 ?. ~ H N H H N H H N H NeC H N N H~ N N H y H~ N N N MV1 MMM Yf H Qp pp QQ p ++ pp p fq~ p ..pn ~ ~ H~~•,H v~HggHc~F gHaQ ~O~~qH Sj4HRHHVHH". F (Vy ~< yN H~HH r1)y MNMN N NYl H~ < 41 OL u e ~' ~ $Gpr$y~9~pp~8 Q$Q~p!8~~~m~y 9i$0~q. ,5~{{t=t~~R$Sj p5pppt ~5~ppi8ppS,8 $$d8d e8 ~e~~' .j.=. ~HNHyMNt~NNH~NISNNyNY)H'~N Ha ~N^ ~g pppppp Vl ``V~f CpppppN ~~(~ilO Qg g~ay8 n~p8(4R g4 R4~gj $n$n8$$$$~g8R Q4R~ =~~~i. F= y~y' 0~~3~3~~3~~~A'~~pa.~~~»~Nn~~~~~et~MtVV fSfVV ~? 2~=y C NN LYHHy~ NN M NH HHHH N~ ~ t Z 1 4f<~ 8,h.,$~8$$888:J8`~,~~~8A888$$8,y8. $ `7f ~^ .'1 8 Or'tf ~(Qpa~ 4STpq X1`1 CIry ~N$$fOC 88,3jy g y t=IJ Q eA ~ OHHNM~~yNMNHNNNHNNii{H~yOHN O U Ef y ~ ~~ ~ 8, ~1Q yy~ ep ~~ ~ ~~'~T~1'+S °'~m263 of~eN~N~~Pm~'NI~'s H..~ F9 «ftVVVv Z i JNVfLiNUW~W~~..I.J..iVINNry.ai..l.ifilh,..1.r'~`~`3 E~. ~ °~~ ~ aF Y• UpZU ~~~yp 9tl V GG~~rt~~ tl m(~[~..j ~VU V,~ ~~n y90001 V~tl ~ ~. FW <(j6 d i~t+~J ~UtJ U,U~o:. N~ U~ aO VI mum' 4F~eF F .:'l ~ijvi,/nd~i ~,^. .~..~. .ji'.~i ~.^.~i~~ir~NA~~~i d0~'~ ,y 8~8e 8~5p~8S~Q$o8$885?888 QQ8 p8 p9~,88888rE ppO H~'1hG N88(p~~M1 ~VyI y~N~F pNp y~y~~(pV88{v~j~ < Oa ~--`O NI~O IVOy~NN~~m-.~~yN NVI IH'~NN~f ~~ N H N H N N N H H m< N H N H N N y 8pMp~-8y~~$ppp8pp$<(p=pey~~18m8pp5t85iR8888R$Ve8Q~~~~yy888yG8Gy~~8_58S8. _. 'f~HNHNmNyHNNNyNH~NMNH ~ji{y1i'1HNV1 p' N N N N N < jg~~' .pop.6pa~~y8~~~~m3=~.p.'~ap_q~~~~.~'~n~ySy~~~' ~~~~i~~~8 a ~ NN NHN MNNNNN yNN 13 ~ NNM i ~~ P e~ c pp < TY $~p'1 NNi,m89p84n~$8~e~n ~e~~,8~'$'N-,8e$g gig Z ^~ HNN~00 Q n-S NHNR--N1`NQQ~SM 0 ~~ < 7 ~ N H~ L1M N N N N y N N N M N e~fU ~ O c pp~ G=j 0~i~~ _.~ $$$~g$S$$$$$ $ti$n$$ $$~$gR8 i Z}=(y. a~ NN NMNH~ NN N N~ HMNLf LSD OL<~(il ' <`4i1 aarr//~~ p p p yy~~ oy~p pppQ p ppp ~~ apQ fV$~O~rQO~$~Opp$SNj8~j{v~Ny Ty {FyON04$V$80py 0, 68 p$Q U V=i~O ~~ G{~NH ~f~H~NNNMNNNN~NNNN~ONNGC{ O Yf Y~ VN~ MN IV I'f N N b p,p,6, yt<e p.p,(~, <y {' y y _ ~ ;NNN(~y~{[~{y~~,.1J ~1N yrnSi ~l .l .J .7 ty N,.1 .LL.1N.J ,.1 ~ ~~.~ ~~~ g ~ '~ .~ { ^~ ~~ cio~u ~~~~3s~i j ~ti~~~~~gtlg tl ~ ~kuu~ Y~ m~,cc u~tl~ iC G~ <j6yya tl~jay7~~~$ t;c{cici~ov.'~~ap*j• ~~ CV ~2~~i~ dCIV ~f1LL6P:U~a K9~~ a0 4i 1 ~ Z 5e ~e Se :r O0.1 ~e Jf ,c F F Y .:'tvid vl ~indw j.~.~. .~. .'~..~.`~n~3a~wS~~.~'a 7~~i 000066 ,~ $pg8y~8pRQ$p888pQ8$ygQBp~t~8pV8(8V~°8a88888~i8==8p 8F L'~ ~~a.V ~~1N ~'K `^:'O1,NtY '1~,IS~HNm~~rM~H ~fn~V 49Qi NNVf NNNNyy NNy N NyMNNNN`y't y V ~~ .S O~NNNyLIHH ~MINNNNyNHN~~O ~~~ ~ O Vf Yl N f~ y ~ N N N N N M N y N H N T1 y N~ ~~ f Zf itl ~ ~~" ~: $C~f$~~.8,$ !$~$$_$8~~~f{{"~I?8$8 S918'A $$m_$Q$8 0~0~ ~_ 9~,$f;Hy~Sf~~Nk'NH~4f81VECNMLI~~~~NGN ~~~~ ~ Ll 111 X030 ~, 8$g8g~8$$$$~$88~$~8$$$SStR8$8 8! ll~~y NN ~NNy~ MH H NN MNYIM S'l~ {Y~ (({.~~~77 ~r}q V~p p pv~ a ppyy~~ ppp p 1 y~~. Sfi ~ (Qp'I4 C!~O{$$O, s4s fOOV~,~$VI Tl~~~{{$~$$R~pp1848 $(9VV I~y~~ ' MHNi4~~yHM~N~~L4~M~Ntt~O,~NN U ~< F N i .7 Nt11M 1.1WY1 Y1~~.J °J °..i un'iNy Wrd .A~WN.i ..l~..l .d ~~ "~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~aa ~~d~ out y°' ~ ~ ~,~ Jcici4~a, ~' ~~ LLWLb QOQ~~ Sri z yr tctuv~nv l:v4tuvivtvliA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Nayor, and Members of the CTty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Menager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. 6i1111and, public Norks Inspector ~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR CUD 88-18, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETNEEN LEMDN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES RECOMNEIOAnaN It 1s recaa~ended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreesrcnt extension and security a~ authorizing the Mayor and City Cierk to sign Bald agreement. BACK61l0UD/AIIALVSIS Improvement Agreement and tmprovament Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for CUP 88-18 were approved by the City Council on October 4, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;124,000 Labor and Material Bond: ; 62,000 The developer, Diversified ProperLles, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement to order to complete all of the required improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subm/ptsd, •~ i ~~~1 ~ ~ Nilltam J. O'Neil City Engineer ~ NJO:SMG:sd Attachments ooc~ss DIVERSH~7ED SHOITMG CENTERS Noveaber 24, 1992 City of Reecho Cucaaonga 10500 civic canter Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucaaonga, California 91729 ]1ttantlon: Stave K. Gilliland NOV 30 1992 CITY OF iL1NUi0 Ci:;I~MbICR Re: Iaprove~ep3t Agrewont !o! CDP 88-18 Haven village SAopping Center Deer Mr. Gillila3d: ~~ i Ne are in receipt of your letter dated lfoveaher 10, 1992 a3q wield to extend our laproveaont agregant relersnced above. Ne intend to start the atrwt ifprovaiants in January, enter the holiday SShoppi3y seawn. Me are doing ~odilicalions to the signal eras of the traffic signal in front of our cantor, Booauw thaw signal eras are special order itep, w needed 12 reeks of lord tiae for lebrication. Our expected delivery daG of the eras is Wceaber 15th. Me anticipate the reaslning atrwt iaproveaents will take an additional eight works to ooapleto. w~ appreciate your consideration of this request. Sincerely, DIVERSITTED BHOPPIINi CIQiTffit$ I~ROhre Project Manager c: John O~H~ara Darren Gill/DiD Coosrclal Construotlon Q~Q~y 3910 W FOp Armor, 8WU app, t.O. W 3017, Caw Mmti CYWnr• 9363430/7 (71 /1931.301 RESOLUTION N0. q3 . Qb p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IbPItOYEMENT AtltEEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 88-18 NHEREAS, the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on January 20, 1993, by Diversified Properties as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Levan Avenue and Highland Avenue; and HHEREAS, the lnstallatlon of such improvements, described 1n said improvement Agreement and subject to the terns thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said CUP 88-38; and NHEREAS, said hmpprovement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfarnla hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension arM said Improvement Security be and the same ere hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. Q~O~~ t;ri Y ur tet~rvuxu ~u~eunvrvi;n STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13566-3 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNESi CORNER OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND SAN SEVAINE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CENTURY AMERICAN It is recomaended that the Cijy Council adopt Lhe attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security end authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BN3C9tOL'10/ANIILVSIS Improvement A regiment and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13566-3 ware approved by the City Council on October 4, 1989, to the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f502,000. Labor and Material Bond: (251,000. The deveioper, Century American, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension an said improvement agreement, 1n order to complete concrete replacement and paving of the interior tract streets. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully suDmltted, ~~Y~'i~ G~l.~~ N1111am J. O'Ne1J City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachments 0000'71 century American November 23, 1992 Steve M. Gilliland CITY o7 RANCHO ~CAmOMdA community Devclopaent Department 10500 Civic Cancer Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT' 17566-3 near Mr. Gilliland: We are requesting en extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13566-3. The required improvements have not been Completed to date as we have had to slow down construction, flue in part to the prevailing economic conditions and to the requirements imposed on us by our lenders. We have achieved IOOt occupancy of Phase i and 2 am of OctoMr 1992 and currently bidding the concrete removal and relacament, as wall as, the Pinal asphalt cap in these phases. This will complete all cork in the above mentioned phases. The work remaining includes construction of the last 20 unite (from slabs to final street improvements). We are requesting en extension of the Improvement Agreameni for an additional 12 months. Your assistance is very much appreciated. cordially, 8TI.11ND11 HI P7IATNBIIH jy/'~cl EunYce Bo art Construction Manages ~o00~K: 3828 Eset Chepman Avenue • P.O. Box 2322.Oranpe, CA 92889 (714)833.177B• Pax X714)833.8010 RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - ~~ A RESOLUTION ~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENi AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-3 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeanga, California, has for its consideration an Iegroveoent Agreeeent Extension executed on January 20, 1993, by Century Aaericen as developer, for the inryrovenent of public right-of-May adfacent to the real property spectficatty described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Suewit Avenue and San Sevatne Avenue; and NNEREAS, the /nstallatlon of such tayroveeents, described in said In~proveexnt AgreeeM:nt end subject to the tents thereof, is to be done in conjunction M1th the developawmt of sold Tract 13566-3; and NHEREAS, sold Ie~proveeknt A9reeaient Extension 1s secured and accaapanled by good and sufficient Iaproveawmt Security, Mhlch 1s identified 1n said Iwfprovee~ent Agreaeent Extension- NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the C1LY of Rancho Cucaeanga, California hereby resolves, that sold Ieprovanent Agraewtent ExUnsion and said Inproveaient Security be and the sane an herby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign sold Iaproveaw!nt Agreneent Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto. 000073 Cl'1'Y Vb' KANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Nesters of the City Council Jack Las, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nillias J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, PuD11c Norks Inspector IL_,y,~- ~ ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION F~OR >TRACT 13717, LOC11TE0 ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE, SU&IITTED BY LEMIS HOMES RECOMIFJNIATIOM it is recossended that the City Council adopt the attached rosolution, accepting the sublecL agreeaxsnt extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sold agreesent. BACK6ROIND/ANALYSIS tsprovesent Agroesent and Iaprovaaknt Security to gusrantee the conseructlon of the public ta>proveaKnts for Troct 13717 were approved by the City Council on Novesber 21, 1991, 1n the following asounts: Church Stroet Tract 13117 Median Lendscaoln9 Faithful Perfarnsnce Bond: (82,000 (64,000 Labor and Material Bond: f41,000 f32,000 The developer, Lewis Hales, is requesting approval oP a 12-south extension on said 1a>proveasnt agreesent due W slow econaslc conditions. Copies of the Isproveaw!nt Agreesent Extension aro available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subsltted, ~ ~~~`.~`l' %~-~~. N111tas J. O'Neil, / City Engineer (v~ NJO:SMG:sd Attachsents 00074 LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. Hsi IL MewMYe AvarP.0. eoi pMlplelp, cMbrN~ Mn Plww:(71~YY-a•/i Fec (7tINe-pop November 18, 1992 city of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drives P. O. Box 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9991730 Attn: Steve M. Gilliland Public Worker Inspector Ref.: Extension of Improvement Agreements for Tract 13717 and Church Street from Elm to Elm Dear Steve: Enclosed are two sets of Improvement Agreement Hxtension lorms, exewted in triplicate, ere well na a check in the amount of $502.00 for the above-referenced projects. Because of the abrupt slowdown in the housing aarket, re were forced to choose between finishing this tract or Tract 13351 and, since that mep was closer to expiration and had !ewer unite, we decided to continue on with that tract. The only work left to do on Church Street between 81m and Slm is the median landscaping which we will probably install before finishing Tract 13717. The perimeter street work is nearly complete on Tract 13717, but none of the interior siderallu, landscaping, etc. will be started on Tract 13717 until Tr. 13351 is nearly sold out or the market improves and warrants completing this project. Therefore, we are requesting a one year extension on the ebova- rafazancad work items. Thank you !or your aasistanca and your consideration of our request. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. Donmpson Project Manager Terra V1eta DMT:kak Enclosures ~~~s RESOLUTION N0. ~ 3 - 0~ D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13717 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on January 20, 1993, by Lewis Haines as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-wqy adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Church Street and Spruce Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Iisprovement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s W be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13717; and MHEREAS, said improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified to said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, Lhe City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension end sold Improvement Security De and the fame are hereby approved and the Mayor is Hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Exttnsion on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest theroto. 0(~Q~6 CITP OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 70: Mayor, and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliae J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ~~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED BETNEEN ELM AVENUE HEST AND SPRUCE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEHIS HOMES It fs recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the suD,ject agreement extension a~M security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sa10 agreement. BACKGALIUD/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for the Church Street Improvements rare approved by the City Council on September 5, 1991, 1n the following total amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f1,094,868 Labor and Material Bond: ; 547,434 The developer, Ler1s Haines, Is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement to order to complete Sidewalks and the median landscaping. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to the C1ty Clark's Office. Respectfully submit d, N1111am J. O'NetY City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. , 1158 N. Mamlaln AvmuN~A. Box 61aNplanq Gll7omlx 91755 Phmr. (770955-W71 Fu: (11 Q919-6788 November 18, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 civic Center Drive P. O. Box 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9991730 Attn: Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector Ref.: Extension of Improvement Agreements for Tract 13717 and Church Street from Elm to Elm Dear Steve: Enclosed are two sets of Improvement Agreement Extension forms, executed in triplicate, as well as a check in the amount of $502.00 for the above-referenced projects. Because of the abrupt slowdown in the housing market, we were forced to choose between finishing this treat or Tract 13351 and, since that map was closer to expiration and had fewer units, we decided to continue on with that tract. The only work left to do on Church Street between Elm and Elm is the median landscaping which wa will probably install before finishing Tract 13717. The perimeter street work is nearly complete on Tract 13717, but none of the interior sidewalks, landscaping, etc. will be started on Tract 13717 until Tr. 13351 is nearly sold out or the market improves and warrants completing this project. Therefore, we are requesting a one year extension on the above- refarenced work items. Thank you for your assistance and your consideration of our request. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. Don "Tfiompson Project Manager Terra Vista DMT:ksk Enclosures ~C~~ RESOLUTION N0. 93-a1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IlWROYEMENT AtltEEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS NHEREAS, the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on January 20, 1993, by Lew1s Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Church Street between Elm Avenue Nest and Spruce Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such tmprorements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub~ett to the Lanes thereof, 1s to be done in conJunction with the development of said Church Street Improvements; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension end said Improvement Security be and the same an hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~_~~ ~~79 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~~ ~ '~~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I~vti-~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION F~JOR TRACTS 14379 AND 14380 LOCATED ON THE NORTNNEST CORNER OF ETIMANDII AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY NATT INLAND EMPIRE INC. RECOMMEIQIITION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tracts 14379 and 14380 were approved by the City Council on November 7, 1991, in Lhe following amounts: Tract 14379 Tract 14380 Faithful Perforwance Bond: (829,000.00 =1,091,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5414,500.00 S 545,000.00 The deveiaper, Natt Inland Empire Inc., 1s requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said ingrovement agreement due to current economic conditions delaying the commencement of the improvements. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the C1ty Clerk's Office. Respectfully submittgd, ~'6I ~ N1111am J. O'Neil C1ty Engineer NJO:SM6:ly Attachments OOOO~U WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC. P.O. Hoz 2026 Palm Springs, California 92263 (619) 325-1120 FAX (619) 322-2971 ~ ,~ ~ ~J:. .~.. December 4, 1992 ~ ~ ~~ Mr. Steve Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91370 RE: Tract No. 14379 - Subdivision Zmprovement Agreement pear Mr. Gilliland: The Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 14379 expired in November 1992. Due to current market conditions, wa do not plan to begin development at this time. 1 respectfully request the City of Rancho Cucamonga to extend the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Accompanying this letter please find three (3) executed extension forma and our check in the amount pf $251. Your help is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ---~-~`ZcZ Thomas E. Hegqi President Watt Inland Empire, Inc. TEN/cjm Enclosur4s OOOC~1 WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC. P.O. Ilox 2026 Palm Springs, California 92263 (619) 325-1320 FAX (619) 322-2971 i'i ~~ December 4, 1992 - _J Mr. Steve Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91370 RE: Tract No. 14380 - Subdivision Improvement Agreement Dear Mr. Gilliland: The Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 14380 expired in November 1992. Due to current market conditions, it has not been economically feasible to complete the improvements. As of this date, grading and certain drainage Yacilitiea have been completed. The remaining improvements which inciufle streets, curb and gutter, and drainage Pacilitiea should be completed within one year. I respectfully request the City of Rancho Cucamonga to extend the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Accompanying this latter plaeee find three (3) executed extension forms and our check in the amount of $251. Your help is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, _I-I-~-.-, ~..~Z Thomas E. Heggi President Watt Inland Empire, Inc. TEH/cjm Enclosures O Ma 2 RESOLUTION N0. ~3 -D~e> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 14379 AIID 14380 NHEREAS. the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on January 20, 1993, by Natt Inland Expire Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adlacer~t to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tracts 14379 and 14380; and NHEREAS, said Inprovexx!nt Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Ixprovemerh; Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~--~ 6 , ~ oocce3 Cfl'Y UP'1[A1VlaiV VUUAMUNUA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 2D, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 38 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-IB, LOCATED ON TWE NEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY IMRTIN J. JASKA, INCORPORATED AECOMNENDATION It is recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the sub,~ect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, aM authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUIID Conditional Ose Penait 90-18, located on the west side of Santa M/ta Avenue north of 4th Street, was approved by the Planning Cammisston on November 14, 1990, far the development of a truck rental, leasing, and maintenance facility consisting of 2 6uildings totaling 12,580 square feet on 4.08 acres of land 1n the General Industrial District, Subarea 14. The Developer, Martin J, Jaska, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site Improvements 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance good: 5137,211.04 Labor and Material Bond: S 68,605.52 Copies of the agreement and security and the Consent and Waiver to Mnexation form signed by the property owner(s) are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Ne~1 City Engineer ~Ittac~ n~s 0000&4 RESOLUTION N0. ! ~-Q (3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-18 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement, by Mertln J. Jaska, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvements of public right-of- way, generally located on the west side of Santa Mite Avenue north of 4th Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in Bald Improvement Agreement and subfect to the terms thereof, is to be done 1n can,iunctton with the development of Bald real property as referred to Planning Cammi sston, Conditional Use Permit 90-18; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified 1n said Improvement Agreement. NQI THEREFORE, THE CITY CgINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEAEBY RESOLVE that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities De and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ t QQ~Q~fs RESOLUTION N0. ~3 -d ~~ A NESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE NIIINTEIUINCE DISTRICT N0. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING IMiNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I ANO 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-18 WHEREAS, the City Councll of the City of Wncho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and H1ghwAys Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Ma/ntenance District No. 38, Street Lighting Maintenance O15trict No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Councll is desirous to take proceedings tO annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereW and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance D15trict have flied with the City Clerk their written consent to the yroposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NO11 THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLY~5 AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are alt true and correct. SECTION 2: That tAis legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhlbtt "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "8" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future Droteedings of the Maintenance O1strlct, including t-Tie Tevy of ali assessments, shall De applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 00(3056 'A• ASSESSMENT DIA~iRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 36 STREET LIGFITMIG MAMI'T'ENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 ~AYN 2Z9-ssi-ob~ /-3Rrr't 7 A[tLFG s 4~ STREfiT CITY O~ RANCHO CUCAMONaA ' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~, n. go_,B s VICINITY MAP Mt EXHIBIT 'B' ACREAGE: 4.08 ac PROJECT: CUP 90-18 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess No. of Lams to be Annexed District No. Units ~_ 1 8.16 --- --- --- --' --- 6 8,16 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess Street District No. Units Name 38 4.08 Santa Anita Community Turf Ground Cover Equest.Tra11 sq• ft• Sg. ft. Trees Ea. 9 J0:1 /20/9a U1'1'Y UP' 1CANUriV l:U I:AMVNIiA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: MAyor and Members of the City Council Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Ph111iD Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13759, LOCATED ON THE HEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, SUBMITTED OY FU MAI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION It 15 recoaiaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13759, accepting the suD~ect agreement and security, ordering the annezatian to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANIILYSIS/BACI(GROUMD Tract 13759, iocated on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad, 1n the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Camalsslon on January P7, 1988, for the division of 14.01 acres into 56 single family lots. The Developer, Fu Mai Llmtted Partnership, 1s submitting an agreement and security (Irrevocable Letters of Credit) to guarantee the construction of the off-site lagrovements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Labor 8 Material Phase [ f 616,000.00 (308,000.00 Phase II ; 547,000.00 f273,500.00 Phase III f 58,000.00 f 29,000.00 Phase IY f 52,000.00 f 26,000,00 Phase Y S 53,000.00 f 26,500.00 Project Totais: f1,326,000.00 f663,000.00 OOOOS9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 13759 - FU IMI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP January 20, 1993 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are avallabie in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and eiementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. A R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Malver to Mnexation fore signed by the Developer is on f11e to the C1ty Clerk's office. Respectfully submi`tEed,~ / ,, '/ `~C ~~lt?~1' NtltTam J. 0 Ne11 City Engineer NJO:PV:Jh Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~3 ~ O~5 A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT tMP NUMBER 13759, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY NHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13759, submitted b_~ Fu Mai Limited Partnership, and consisting of 56 lots located on the west side o~'Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad , was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 27, 1988, and is in compliance with the .State Subdivision Map Act and Loral Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and ' NHEREAS, Tract Map No. 13759 is the final map of the division of land aDProved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Fu Mai Limited Partnership as developer; and NHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 13759 1s hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be flied for record. 91 OOOO~i'Z b.Lie.OCYrS wK«+r¢vr i,~ :T L' ~+ _ i EXHIBIT 'q' TRACT NO 9344 ~e ~x/ydt _ i _ _ __ ~ _ ___L__.. ?8 i 37 28 127- ~ 21 ~ 20 ~_L w n~ 1~ 2 3 4~ 5 1 6 7 i 8~ 9; t0 ; t t ~,;,;rr !;(r ~~ Yg ` eF ~. 15 i :ili ~ I~L_? Zl [J I !J 4Z1 }I _ as ~ ,,~ ~ -s ~ r ' :z'i r ~i ~ ~ 7» , t~ i ~ ' V7 1Jf ~ :w ?+ : d1 A _ ..ti;2` I„ 8 r I ~ 3D JD __J Y ::~la~ U a7 lrsl~d is ~ .'s w v c _, CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OF 'SAN OERNARpINO ~j EXHIBIT 'A' ,~ STATE OF CALILcORN1A TR 13759 A/ 16 Y 1P IO M + 07 li ~ _ ~^ lr ~n ,~ ~J i a Z [ Ci • ~ i - 6 i~ a s d ~ o 7A7~/ Q7 N . _.. .' . r C.' , .~ '.'i': 1 ~•e r%~ +. VV/C/N Mr 7H .vN~ RESOLUTION NO,Q3.0/(~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13759 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"1; and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council Ts desirous Lo take proceedings to annex the property described on ExAlbit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have flied with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: fiat the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the propel as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work prograA~ areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including a evy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~~~ EXMIlIT 'A' ASSESSMENT ~IAQRAM LANDSCAPE MANTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 TRACT 13759 W I` G D CITY MAINTAINED AREAS '~ • BTREET LIGHT F° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA COUNTY OF SAN 9ERNARpNlO - i ,~ STATE OR CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT ~A~ EXHIBIT 'B' N0. OF D.U. 56 Area 14,01 ac PROJECT: TRACT N0. 13759 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess No, of La s to be Annexed District No. Units i 1 56 -- 4 -- __ __ 2 56 17 -- __ __ __ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District Assess Street No. Units Nance 1 56 Center Ave. La Vine St. Messada St. Hanover Ct. El burn Ct. Amherst Ct. Haven Ave. Conwunity Turf Ground Cover Trees Equest.Trail Sq• ft• Sg. ft. Ea. --- --- --- 41 --- --- --- 14 --' --- '-- 10 --- --- --- I1 --- --- 3,800 25 ~~~'.9J vrrv Ur' HANCxU GUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the Ctty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II ~~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF HELLMAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS INiO THE MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AND REDUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCE BOND FROM f759,085 TO f75,900 FOR TRACT 14192-1 RECOMIEMdITIOM It is recommended that City Council accept the Hellman Avenue street improvements into the maintained street system and reduce the Perforamnce Bond from (759,085 to f75,900. BACIIGROIIMB/ANALYSIS Tract 14192 Ts located on the east side of Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street and is being developed 6y Hix Development. The Engineering Division conditions of this tract Include the completion of the Hellman Avenue street improvemeMS prior to the issuance of bull ding permits. The developer complied and did indeed compiete all conditioned improvements on Hellman Avenue. The interior street improvements are currently under construction and are approximately 80% completed. Nhen the Improvement Agreement and Bonds were accepted by City Council on November 21, 1991, the Perfon!ance Band in the amount of f759,085 included ali street improvements (interior tract streets and Hellman Avenue). Since early completion of Hellman Avenue was conditioned and the improvements are now complete, :nd since all tract improvements cannot be accepted at this time, it 1s being recoanended Lhat Council accept only the Hellman Avenue street improvements into the maintained street system and reduce the Performance band frae f759,085 to 575,900. Nhen the remaining street improvements are complete, staff will recommend that Council accept all improvements, and a Notice of Completion will be filed at that time. ~~Q~l'~ CITY COUNCIL STUFF REPORT TRACT 14192 - NELLMAN AVE. STREET IMPROYEMENTS JANUARY 20, 1993 PAGE 2 Developer: Hix Develognent 431 5. Cataract Avenue, Suite 3 San Dimas, CA 91773 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f759,085 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f 75,900 Respectfully submitted, ~~~'~~ Nilliam J. O'Neil C1 ty Engineer MJO:SNG:sd ~OC'C~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APYLI CATION TO DESIGNATE TEIE PEARS ON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE, LOCATED AT 12912 POOTHILL BOULEVARD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN 100-761-02 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSfiSSMENT OF DEMOLITION REQUEST POR THE PEAASON STATION AND GARAGE (A POTENTIAL ILH'AL LANDMARK, STATE LANDMARK, AND NATIONAL REGISTER BL IGIBLE STAUCPURE) - A request by Barry Vanti gar, et al, to demolish a portion of the Pearson Filling Station end Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, - APN: 1100-161-02. AHCf1M®7DATION The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council approve an application to designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Historic Landmark. In response to the demolition request of a portion of this structure, the Commission further recommends the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report in order to best assess the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that could be considered include the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 811CKGRO0ND The Council continued this item from their December 16, 1992 meeting with direction that there would be no further continuances. The continuance was in order to allow for the Lima needed to receive initial findings on the subject structure's eligibility for the National Re giater of Historic Places from the State Office of Nis tonic Preservation. The Historic Preservation Commission requested thin review by the State Office eo that the full historic signif icnnce of the building would be determined and to ensure that the owner and the City did not reduce available restoration options. If the building were deemed eligible fox the Register and the owners wished to rehabilitate it, they could apply for income tax reductions of up to 20 percent for the year in which t'~.iey complete the rehabilitation project. The poste cochere's proposed demolition wind impact the etructute's potential eligibility for the National Reglatez• At the time of the writting of this report, staff has yet to receive a to eponee from the State Office of Historic preservation on the information we sent November 3, 1992. UUlYV~7V CITY COUNC LL STAFF REPORT PEAASON FILL ZNG STATION AND GA PAGE Sanuary 20, 1993 Page 2 The issues to be decided upon by the Council remain the Landmark Designation, as unanimously recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission, and the environmental assessment of the request to demolish the Porte cochere portion of the Pearson Station and Garage. A Landmark Designation would not preclude the approval of the demolition of the pone cochere element of the structure if such action were the Council's choice. All City Landmarks are required to 9o though a Landmark Alteration Permit process; however, since the Historic Preservation Commission has already reviewed the proposed partial demolition request, the Council could take final action on the assessment of this alteration tonight. atsroAlc e~s~vArxoN cGy+ISSxoN AcrloN AND aesPavsss The Co:msission found that the structure, known historically as the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, clearly met moat all of the criteria outlined in the City's Historic Preservation Orflinance and that furthermore, the station repre cents both the Etiwanda mawunity and importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore (please refer to Exhibit "A", staff report and resolution recommending approval from the special Historic Preservation Commission meeting of August 25, 1992). It was built in 7928-1929, a few years after Route fib opened in 9926, by one of the area's most important contractors, Henry xlusman. Virtually unaltered, the Pearson Filling Station and Gara qe stands as one of the oldest and rarest examples in the entire region of vernacular roadside architecture. The Commission, upon their review of the structure, determined unanimously to reconmend landmark Desi gnatlon and that the historic station was also potentially eligible for placement on the National Register of Historic Places. On the issue of eligibility, the owners of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage have hired an independent architect to evaluate the building's significance (please see Exhibit "B"). Staff's initial review of the report submitted by this consultant, Louie Skelton, located one significant error. Namely, that the Porte cochere "appeared to be added later,^ according to Mr. Skelton. Assessor's Records and the recollections of Mr. Pearaon'a two sans, who remember the building of the station, both reveal that the entire building was constructed at one time and no portion was added. CQiCLOSION The City Council has several alternatives. Two possible alternatives are as follows: Ae recommended 6y the Historic pre servetion Conmiseion, approve Landmark Designation and direct that a focused EIR be prepared prior to a demolition decision being made; or 2• Approve the Landmark Designation and a Landmark Alteration Permit for the demolition of the canopy with a Negative Declaration end 000099 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GAAAGE January 2D, 1993 Page 3 appropriate mitigations (see Environmental Assessment Eor possible mitigations). Either of these alternatives wi 11 satisfy the requirements of Municipal or State codes. 8<iViRO@flIIITA7. " ".,la7T: As the Council will recall, Ne Historic Preservation Commission determined that demolition of any portion, including the ports cochere, of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage could not 6e mitigated fully and recommended that a Pocuaed Environmental Impact Report be conducted. The Cosmiaeion also moved unanimously that the structure be secured by fencing, (which has been done since the last meeting) and that the installation of the ultimate intersection improvements be tied to future development of this nOrthedat corner. If the Council does not concur with the Cos®ia eion'e assessment, and thus determines that the impact of the proposed demolition can be mitigated, another option would be to approve the iaeuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If the Council should thus determine, staff would recommend cronsideration of the following mitigation measures: Document the ports cochere structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Historic American Building Survey (HAHS) guidelines, prior to issuance of a Demolition Permit for the ports cochere; or Document the entire structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Historic American Building Survey (HA BE) guidelines, prior to issuance of a Demolition Permit Eor the ports cochere (the reason for requiring that the entire structure be documented at this time would be to en au re that the context of. the ports cochere, to the main structure, is not forgotten). It is estimated that the coat to do the entire structure is approximately $7,000; to do the ports cochere only would be approximately $4,000. 2. Prior to tl~e development or redevelopment of the property, the property owner shall perform a feasibility study on the adaptSVe reuse of the gas station structure, including the re-establishment of. the removed ports cochere. The study shall include a report from: i) a qualified structural engineer, who specializes in historic structures, to determine the structural soundness of the st ructute and the potential for its relocation; 2) a qualified arcY~itect and an economic analyst to establish a range of possible uses that are historically sensitive, economically feasible, and that best utilise the site and structure. The study shell also address the need and type of additional mitigations that may be necessary Sf. the ultimate dsvelopment of the site impacts the Kist -,r.ic relevance of the gas station structure and ports cochere. QlY\,'.Ll•0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PEARHON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE January 20, 1993 Page 4 PACT" POR FINDINGS: The environmental review of the proposed partial demolition of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage is in keeping with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, General Plan, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Further environmental analysis is provided in the attached staff report from the August 25, 1992, Historic Preservation Commission meeting. The demolition will have a detrimental effect on one of our eovmlunity's historic resources. WRRSSPUpffiICE: These items have Deen re-advertised ae a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dai1~~HUlletin hewapaper, notices were Gent Lo property owners with In a 300 foot radius of the structure, and the site has been posted. Resp u y e Arad er City Planner BB:AH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report dated December 16, 1992, with Historic Preservation Coamiasion Reeolution No. 92-04, and minutes dated August 25, 1992 Exhibit "B" - Report to Louis Skelton for Harry Vanti ger, et al Resolution of Approval o~c~cs c1'1'Y VY' RANCHO CUCAMONGA =<y;:y. STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Hied Duller, City Planner BY: Anthea Harti g, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02 - Approval of an application to designate the Penrson Filling Station and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Faneho Cucamonga, as a Historic Landmazk - APN: 1100-061-02. Continued from October 7, 1992. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DEMOLITION AEOUSST FOR THE PEAASON STATION AND GAPAGE (A POTENTIAL LOCAL LANDMA RR, STATE LANDMARK, AND NATIONAL REGI STHR SLIGI DLE STRUCPVRE) - A cequeai by Barry Vantigez, et al, to demolish e portion of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill eoulevardr APN: 1100-061-02. The Historic Preservation Commission rernamenda the preparation of a Pocueed Environmental Impact Report in order to beat assess the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that could be considered include the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Continued from October 7, 1992. RECOI!®DAtION: The Historic preservation Co®iaeion recommends that the City Council approve an application to designate the Pearson Pilling Station and Garage as a Historic Lan dmazk. In response to the demolition request of a portion of this structure, the Covmiseion further recommends the preparation of a Pocueed Bnvironmental Impact Report In order to best assess the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that cou.Ld be considered, by minute action, include the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a conditioned demolition permit. BACiGItlOIID: This item was continued from the Council's October 7, 1992, meeting in order to allow further time to assess a number of issues related to the improvements of the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, including the determination of the historic significance (per the National Register of Historic Plecee criteria) of the Paeraon Garage and Filling Station (please refer io Exhibit "A^ for the related staff report). On related right-of-way issues, City Engineer, Joe O'Nai 1, will present an oral update at this meeting. At xanua:~~ 2., 1093 ~-~-{~IgIT' 1,~~ CITY CO-NCIL STAFF REPORT L- 92-02 - PEARSON GARAGE ce camber 16, 1992 Page 2 the time of wr±ting this staff report, staff has yet to hear from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SRPO) and thus has not received hie analysis of the structure's eligibility for inclusion on the National Register. An information packet was sent to the SHPO by express mail on November 2, 1992, and two follow-up phone calls have been placed to the SHPO office (see Exhibit ^H"). The owners of the property, represented by Harry Vantage r, hired Long Beach architect I,ovis Skelton of Inns rspace Design to perform an independent review of the Pea za on Garage and Filling Station's history and significance. From initial conversations with Gary Womack, the broker working with Mr. Vantiger and Partners, it appeared that along with checking the acwracy of staff and the Historic Preservation Commission's findings, Mr. Skelton would also perform a preliminary relocation and reuse feasibility study. At staff's one meeting with Mr. Skelton, who has had extensive experience relocating historic structures, he offered an initial opinion chat zelocnting the garage building would not pose any insurmountable difficulties. Staff had hoped to have Mr. Ske lton'e findings to include in this report but hne yet to receive any information. Mr. Womack indicated the repot[ may be ready Monday, December 14. 11NALYSIS: The Hiaioric Pre 6e rva Gaon Cammieaion de tezmined that the structure dcea meet the criteria for local landmark deslgnaiion and recommends that the Council designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a landmark because of its important place in the built environment of our region. Both staff and the Historic Prase zvation Commission are aware that the canopy structure cannot feasibly remain in its current location but believe cultural, civic, and economic benefits would arise from the rehabili tatiun of [his community resource. In order to preserve all available economic options for the property owns ra, documentation and relocation or reconstzuctlon of any portion of the structure should be worked out wish the 3RP0, if the State dcea de to amine the building eligible for the National Re gi ate t. If it Se ell gable, any future income-producing renovation projeMe on the structure could apply for federal Investment Tax Credits (ITCH). The ITC program allows for a pe rcentaga (up to 20 percent) of rehabilitation costs to be credited against pe reonal income taxes owed to the Federal Government. However, removal of the ports cocheze portior. of the structure could jeopardize the stxucture'e eligibility for the National Re gia ter and, therefore, the Dane rs' poientiel for ITC savings. If the structure is not listed on the National He gi star and undergoes a sensitive rehabilitation, it would be eligible for a 10 percent ITC. These federal programs have se rued to mnke many eligible rehabilitation proje cte more coat-effective while preserving valuable coamunl ty resources. oQrsc3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LD 92-02 - PEARSON GARAGE December 16, 1992 Page 3 SAyIRD[QD3M1'AL ASSES9RSRf: As the Council will recall, the fliatoiic Prase rvatior. Commission determined that demolition of any portion, including the poste cochere, of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage could not be mitigated fully and recommended that a Focused Environmental Impact Report be conducted. The Commission also moved unanimously that the Structure be ae cured by fencing (which has been done since the last moeting) and that the installation of the ultimate intersection improvements be tied to future development of this northeast corner. If the Council does not concur with the Commission's assessment, and thus date manes that the impact of the proposed demolition can be mitigated, another option would be to approve the issuance of a Mitigated Negative ceclaration. Sf the council should thus determine, staff would recommend consideration of the following mitigation measures: Document the ports cochere structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Aietoric American Building Survey (AABS) guidelines, prior to isaunnce of a Demolition Permit for the poste cochere; or Document the entire structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Aietoric American Huilding Survey (AAHS) guidelines, prior to issuance of a Demolition Permit for the ports cochere (the reason for requiring that the entire structure be documented at this time would he to ensure that the context of the ports cochere, to the main structure, is not forgotten). It is estimated that the coat to do the entire structure ie approximately $7,0001 to do the poste cochere only would be approximately $6,000. Prior to the development or redevelopment of the property, the property owner eha 11 perform a feasiblli ty study an the adaptive reuse of the gas station structure, including the rerestabliahment of the removed poste cochere. The study shall Snclude a report tram: 1) a qualified structural eng'.neer, who specializes in historic structures, to determine the structural soundness of the etructura and the potential for its re low tionl 2) a qualified architect and an economic analyst to establish a range of possible uses that are hiatorioally cenaitive, economically feaeiDle, and that best utilize the Bite and structure. The study shall also address the need and type of additional mitigations that may be necessary if the ultimate development of the Bite Salpncie the historic relevance of the gas atntion structure and poste cochere. Q~Q'~~X CITY CWNCZL STAFF REPORT LD 92-02 - PEARSON GARAGE pecember 16, 1992 Page 4 FACfS FOR PIIIDIN[S: The environmental re View of the proposed partial demolition of the pea rson Filling Station and Garage is in keeping with the City's Historic Pse nervation Ordinance, General plan, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Further environmental analysis is provided in the attached staff report from the August 25, 1992, Historic Preservation Commi scion meeting. The demolition will have a detrimental effect on one of our cosanunity's historic resources. CORRSSpOMDRICE: These items have been re-advertised ae a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newepape r, notices were sent to property owners althln a 300 foot radius of the structure, and the site has been posted. Peeps 6u d, ~~- HrBd 1 City Tanner .. HB: M: sp Attachments: Exhibit ^A" - Staff Feport dated October 7, 1992, with Historic Pre eervation Caarmiseion Resolution No. 92-04 and minuLea dated August 25, 1992 Exhibit "B" - Letter to SHPO, dated November 2, 1992 Exhibit ^C" - Memo From Jerry Grant, September 16, 1992 Resolution of Approval ooc~scs CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE T0: FROM: eY: SUHJEL T: October 7, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02 - Rpp royal of an application to deli gnats the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, located at 72912 Foothill Sou levard, Rancho Cucamonga, as a Historic Landmark - APN: 7100-161-02 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENL OF D@fOLITION REQUEST FOR THE PEARSON STATION AND GARAGE (A POTENTIAL i/.1CAL LANDMARK, STATE LANDMARK, AND NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE STRUCTURE) - A request to demolish a portion of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga - APN: 1100-161 -02. The Historic Preservation Commis elon recommends the piepara tion of a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in order to beat arse as the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that could he considered include the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. RBCOMM86DATIQI: The. Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council approve an application to designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Historic Landmark. In response to the demolition request of a portion of this structure, the Commission further recovmends the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report in order to hest asaes6 the adverse impact to this resource. Other options that could be considered include the issuance of a Mitigated Ne gat.i ve Declaration. EACKGROOND: The process by which we have come to this review has been complicated and lengthy and it stems from street improvement requirements at the Sntereection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue of the Foothill Marketplace project. Initial concerns of the property owners were the result of queatione raised by their insurance company about the potential for, increased liability if the location o° the traffic signals on that northeast corner were placed in their ultimate location - placing the ports-corhere (coveted portico or canopy) of the gas station, moat of which is in the right-of-way, close to the signal. More recently, we have learned that Sf the signal and 16.tiaczmLcn,g2~ ~~ ~!LT aI^[,r-.. CITY CODNCIL STAFF REPORT PEARSON PILLING STATION October 7, 1992 Page 2 curb return arr. placed in their ultimate location it will regssire the re-routing of the high powered 661CV electrical lines. The re-routing would put the 66RV line directly over the station's poste-cochere and thereby also necessitate demolition. Since the Historic Preservation Commission's action on August 25, 7992, an on-site inspe uti on of the station's poste-cochere aae made by Jerry Grant, City Sullding Official, at the request of the City Planner. The purpose of the inspection vas to gather additional information on the pcss able relocation and reuse o£ the station's poste-cochere. The Huil dittg Official found that the current condition of the poste-cochere constitutes a public nuisance and should be abated by fencing around the ports-cochere, pending any permanent solution to its existence. Ae also determined that attempts to relocate the structure might very well result in it falling apart in Lhe process fees Exhibit "C^). With this new information, and the fact that the ultimate street improvements will require the removal of the ports-cochere, staff 'e recommendation includes the option of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigated Negative Declaration with conditions would allow for the removal of the ports-cochere. This option was not presented to the Historic Preae rvation Commission at their August 25, 7992 meeting since the inepe coon ass not made by the City Hui1d1n9 Official until later. Should the City Council determine that they support the applicant's request for demolition and that the proposed mitigations do address the loss of the existing poste-cochere, the City Council say take action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration by minute action at this meeting. Whether the City Council requires a focused Environmental Impact Report or a Mitigated Negative Declaration, the immediate fencing of the porte- cochere ie re commended until a permanent de cislon is made. 9ISTORIC PRiSSm[gATIQi COlYQ88IOR ACxIOIt: The Commission found thnt the structure, known historically ae the Pea raon Filling Station and Garage, clearly net moat of the criteria outlined in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and that furthermore, the eta ti on repreeenta both the Etiwanda Community and importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore (see Exhibit "A"). 1t was also built in 1928-1929, a few years after Route 66 opened Sn 1926, by one of the area's moat important contractors, Henry Rlueman. Virtue lly unaltered, the Pea raon Pilling Station and Garage 6[ande as a one of the olds et and rarest examples in the entire region of vernacu laz roadside archlte ctnre. The Commission upon their review of Lhe structure determined unanimously to recommend landmark designation and that the historic station aae also potentially eligible for placement on the Natlonnl Pegiatez of Historic Plecea. Lastly, the Commission recommended the aignnle be alloned to be placed in an SnYarim location, rather then ultimate, in order to give adequate time fora complete Brody. V O^1V I CITY COONCIL STAFF REPORT PEARHON FILLING STATION October 7, 7992 Page 3 @7yIP0[@~P'fAL 11SSHS9)ffi7'f: The action to approve the landmark statue of the said structure is exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15380. Because of their fSndings ana upon review of Initial Studies, Parts i and Il, [he Commission finds that this proposed demolition of tF.e porte- cochere will have an adverse impact on the Pea raon Filling Station that cannot be mitigated fully. ey minute action, the Commi salon unanimously recommended that the ultimate street signal configuration be delayed and that it remain in an interim location until the property owner on the northeast corner ie ready to develop their property and, if the Council does not wish to delay the ultimate placement of the improvements, that a focused Environmentsl Impact Report and other necessary studies be prepared to assess completely the impact on the etrunture (see Exhibit ^C"). As noted in the background section of this report, if the Council does not concur with the Commissi.on's asaesament, and thus determines that the impact of the proposed demolition ~n be mitignted, another option would be to approve the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If the Council should thus date sure, staff would recommend consideration of the following mitigation menaurea: Document the porte-cochere structure, according to the standards laid out Sn the federal Riatoric American Building Survey (MARS) guidelines, prior to issuance of bemolition Fe rmSt for the ports-cocheres or oocument the entire structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Niatorlc American Building Survey (NABS) guidelines, prior to iasuan~¢ of Demolition permit for the ports-cochere (the reason Eor requiring that the entire structure be documented at this time would be to ensure that the context of the ports-cochere to the main structure is not forgotten). It is estimated that the coat to do the entire structure is npproxlmate ly $7,000; to do the ports-cochere only would he npproxiamtely $4,000. Prior to the development oz redevelopment of the property, the property Omer she 11 perform a feasibility study on she adapilve reuse of the gee atatign structure, including the reestabllsF.ment. of. the removed ports-cochere. The study ahnll include a report from: 1) a qualified structural engineer, who apecialiaes in historic structures, to determine the etrvctural soundness of the structure and the potential for its relocation) 2) a qua lifted archlte ct and an economic annlyet to eetabli eh a range of possible uses that are historically sensitive, economics lly feasible, and that beet uti liae the Bite and etrvcture. oac~see CITY CO[JNCTL STAFF R%PORT P%ARSON FILLING STATION October 7, 1992 Page 4 The study shall also address the need and type of additional mitigations that may be necessary if the ultimate development of the site impacts the historic relevance of the gas station structure and ports-cochere. PACTS PGR FINDINGS: The environaental review of the proposed partial demolition of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage is in keeping with the City's Nistoric Preservation Ordinance, General Plan, and Foothill eoulevaxd Specific Plan. Further environmental analysis is provided in the attached staff report from the Avqust 25, 1992 Aietorln Pre ae roeti on Covual &Sion meeting. The demolition will have a detrimental effect on one of our cosmm~ity's historic resources. CORR68P(AIGHNC6: These items have been adve rtiaed es a public hearing in the Inland Va11eY Gaily Bulletin newspaper, notices were sent to property awns ra within a 300-foot radius of the structure, and the site have been punted. Reaps lly su: to d, Brad liar Cl ty P18 nnEL BB:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Deport dated August 25, 1992 Exhibit "B^ - Aiatoric Preservation Cowaiseion Reaol.ution No. 92-04 Exhibit "C" - ASetozlc Preservation Coomti esion minutes dated August 25, 7992 Exhibit "D" - Memo dated September 16, 1992 WQZ09 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 25, 1992 .... Chairman and Members of the Histozic Pzeservation Convni scion FROM: Larry 1. He rde rson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Y.a rtig, Associate Planner S L'BSECT: CONS TnERA TTON DF A (` AN. D TH HICTORTC CTAT rc pND APP I ATI Ot'C F CTAB •i SHMFNT OF MTTTC.AT TON MFACLiRFC THEAFIN FOR THe pcpR ON CORNER nF - Consideration and determination of the histo zit status, application for Poinr. of Interest or Landmark Designation, range of appropriate project alternatives, and level of appropriate mitigations for the pact ial demolition of the structure. The actions and recommendations can include the Eoll owing: La ndmazk status, Point of Interest status, other project alternatives, and/or mitigation measures prior to demolition. HA.C RPRO[MD: On Culy 30, 1992, 9arry Vant ige r, on behalf of his parcne rs, requested the partial demo lit ten of a building historically known as tte Pearson Filling Station and Gazage, located at 12912 Foothill boulevard. Rased upon Historic Preservation Cortvni scion policy, a Landma zk/Point of Interest De si gr.atien application was initiated in order to est a6lish a formal review procedure. After subsequent review, [he structure was also added to the Historic Sites Survey as a Potential Local Lan dmerk and Potential Listing on the National Reqi stet of Historic Places (at the cuzrent time, the Status of the State Point of Interest program is suspended until a program initiating a State Register of Historic Places can be implemented). At its meeting of August 6, 1992, Che Historic Preservation Conant scion agreed to held a special public hearing to determine [he significance of the Pearson Station and to review the associated demolition request ([he Landmark Designation application is inci uded as Exhibit ^HPC-1" and Site Plan Exhibit "HPC-2"1. the process by which ve have come to this review has been .;omplicated and ie ngthy and it stems from the involved Foothill Marketplace project (site of the future Price Club and WalMa ztl. Zn approving the Conditional Use Permit fcr the Foothill Marketplace cen[e z, the Ci[y placed a condition on the project requiting the improveme nc of the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda Avenue intersection. Tne full extent of these improvements was not known a[ the time of project approval and at the time cf this commission's review of the impacted cultural resources on the southwest corner because detailed plans were not available. It has only been through [ha review of the final scree[ improvement plans that we have tea lized the full impact of the required changes. Based on the traffic study for the project and the r_ity's traffic model, it was determined [hat the developer needed to complete a range cf RPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 2 improvements, including placement of the traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue, which is to be upgraded to handle the anticipated traffic. As is policy with the installation of traffic signals, the City requires the signal poles to be located in their ultimate location to avoid having to relocate the poles at a later date. In the specific instance at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, the pole will be located aFProximately 30 feet northeast of its current location, placing it in line with the canopy of the existing gas station on that corner. Initial plans for the northeast coiner were approved by both Calt rans and the City with the pole in its ultimate location with temporary curbs and pavement proposed that would eliminate the need to alter the canopy. The developer then proceeded to work with the property owners to obtain the necessary right-of-way in order to install the signal. It seemed that agreement had been reached between the two parties until the property owners' insurance company threatened to cancel their insurance if the pole was placed in the approved location. The insurance company claimed that the proposed pole location would encourage more pedestrians to walk under the 3as station canopy in order to access the c zosswaik. This, in their opinion, places the station in a position of greater liability and, therefore, could not be supported. As a zesul t, the prope r[y owner does feel it is in their best interest to provide [he developer with the necessary street dedication. On July 29, 1992, City staff aiet with the developer of the center and the gas station property owners to discuss alternatives to placing the signal in the ultimate location. one suggestion called for the signal to be placed in an interim location, within the existing right-of-way, that would not irt~act the gas station canopy. This solution would require the pole to be relocated upon development of the northeast corner, Also, the interim location would be contrary to current City policy. The Ci[y has also pursued the possibilitl' of installing a chain link fence around the canopy to prevent access under the canopy. According to the property owner, this alternative we9 not found to be acceptable by the property owners' insurance company. A third suggestion called for the removal of the canopy in order to eliminate the "liab it iiy" expressed by the property owner's insurance company, In that this solution would place the pole in the ultimate location and remove a potential liability, the property owner submitted a demolition permit requesting removal of the canopy. It should be noted [hat a written explanation of the insurance company's position has not been submitted. Following submittal of the demolition permit, staff also received correspondence tzom the developer that a substantial elect zical utility line and pole at the northeast corner had to be relocated in order to widen the st zee[ as approved. By doing this, the utility pole would be located close to the proposeU signal location. Because the power lines angle to the east, the relocation of the utility pole would place Che lines over the existing canopy, contrary to the policy of SouGhe cn California Edison ~SCe~. If left in the rote rim location, the lines would be away from the building a sufficient distance to satisfy SCE. ~Q~1 ~ NPC STAFF REPORT PF.AASON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 3 SITE LOCATION ANn DESCRIPTION: A. i.n~ar;on: The structure lies in the northeast corner of the parcel at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue and the parcel is close to two acres in size. The site's topography is relatively flat and other distinguishing features include a variety o£ mature trees. B. no.: Qnat:..n.; The parcel lies within Subarea a of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and pax Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 91-D1 submitted by the same property owners, this corner parcel's land use designation was changed from Medium Residential to Community Commercial, and includes the requirement of a Master elan for the site and surrounding area. C. coecif is Plan Dgv!gnat :_ons: As with the subject prope zty, the parcels to the north, soutR, east, and west ass also designated Community Co~mmezcial per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. D. Arch; aT~i~rnl na~Q~rip ion: The at ruCture Sa a former ae rviae station and garage. The large zectangulaz concrete, single-story building has a three-bay ports cochere. There are moture trees to the east of the structure. The roof is a flat hip with red barrel Lila for both the building and pozte cochere. The Lila roof on the north elevation has been removed and replaced with asphalt shingles of a matching color. A skylight with six panes Ras also been added to the middle of the hip roof on the north elevation. The pocte cochere bases are constructed of poured concrete. The north and south bases Rad two pampa each and the middle base had one pump, all of xhich have been removed. The columns are aqua re and unadorned, with slightly flared capitals. The main garage is constructed of slip-form poured concrete and the ports cochere is of wood frame construction with thick cement stucco. The walls are currently painted white with zed accent under the eaves. There is evidence that the walls were once paintetl red, mustard, and navy blue at dif Eecent tinias. The fenestration pattern o£ the structure is as follows: North Elevation: The door (approximately 6 i/2 feet high) Ras been removed and the opening has been boarded up. There are two 20-paned windows side-by-aide to the east of the door on the north elevation. A metal grate has Deen added to the windows. The six panes in the center of the windows open outward. South Elevation: The front door is under the ports cochere. It is a single door with a single-pane xindow. Above the door is a ai ogle-paned window and there are single-paned, wood-framed windows to the left and right of the doors. The window to the left is boarded over with metal grates. The six panes in the center of tha windows open outward, ooai~ HPC STAFF REPORT PEARS OtJ FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 gage 9 East Elevation: There are two windows, spaced approximately 10 feet apart, that have 20 panes. Both windows are covered wie}+ metal grates. The six panes in the center of the windows open outward. c?est Elevation: There is a 20-paned wintlow on the south side cove zed with a metal grate. The six panes in [he center of the window open outward. There is a small service bay on the west elevation and a larger service bay on the south elevation. The se zvice bay doors on the south elevation are constructed of 2 I/2-inch vertical siding with 5 1/2-inch boards spaced 4 1/2 feet apart. There are three decorative hinges on the top of each of the sliding doors and the 5 1/2-inch boards are cut to a pcint on the base board. Tt.e sliding doors are on a track mechanism that is still in place. There are two 18-inch concrete Dutt resses, one on each aide of the service bay doors. There is one gooseneck light above the right service bay door and there is one gooseneck light to the right of the service bay doors. The small service bay on Lhe west elevation has double wooded tloors and is constructed of 2 1/2-inch vertical siding on the top and 6-inch Horizontal siding on the bottom. There axe small wooden decorations on the top corners. The tloor corners are rounded. There are also two 1B- inch concrete buttresses, one on each side of the service bay doors. Centered above the doors is a gooseneck light. ANALY STC--SnNnMaR D I NAT ON A. H+= or' a~ Ba kpry; The service station was built in 1928-1929 by an important local coot zactor, Henry Klusman the renowned concrete man, for John "Doc" Pearson antl Lee Stevens who were brothers-in-law. They sold gas for automobiles as well as distributing it to the local citrus ranchers. After a short time, Mr. Pearson alone ownetl the station and provided a full complement of automobile-related services. Located along Rontc 66 which had been completed in 1926, Che station was a frequent stop of Depression-era immigrants who would spend the night in their cars on the site because they had no other place to stay. Also at that time, Doc Pearson gave gas away to travel:erg who simply could not pay. P.J. Pearson Clark, Doc's niece, recalls one of the more o'utatending humanitarian efforts exhibited by Ter uncle. A "Dust Howl" family had completely run out of money when they reached Etiwanda. it seems one of their sons had a lovely voice, ao lovely in fact that the family was moving from Oklahoma Co Hollywood so he could be ''discovered." Mc. Pearson, after hearing the boy sing, organized a convnunity concert a( the Pearson's family packing house and raised enough money for the young boy and his family to continue their travels. The station also served fox many decades as a gathering place for locai residents. Grove owners would come Co the station when it was cold and together would wait and wonder if temps rata ree would drop below freezing. Nhile they waited they would gather around the radio for entertainment. Residents of Etiwanda had only three places to purchases pp~p113 HPC STAFF REPORT PEAASON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 5 their gasoline and of them, Pears en's was the most modern and fu11- serviced. Highway Patrol officers assigned to the local stretch of Route 66 also congregated at the service station, in particular Frank Freeman and ^Two-GUn^ Louis, who spent many hours with their friend Doc Pearson. An episode retold by Mr. James Cla xk is particularly revealing of the role the service station played in decades gone by; namely, of the races that would be held along Route 66, Foothill Boulevard, from the border of Upland to Doc Pea rson's garage. The twn officers we,:ld station themselves at either end to stop traffic on the two-lane road and allow the mot oxcycle races to proceed. Mr. Pearson eventually sold the station to the Myers family, who continued to operate in the same consnunity-based spirit. The station and garage also represent a basically intact example of a local, vernacular expression of the very popular Spanish Revival architectural style constructed by the foremost concrete contractor of the day, Henry Rlusman, As such, it is the only example of its building tyFe to have retained as much of its original appearance and one of a handful of rapidly disappearing Rlusmen structures. Along the regional stretch of Foothill Boulevard, the roadside vernacular that characterized the physical landscape of Route 66 is rapidly being replaced. The Pearson Filling Station and Garage remains, however, as a testament to this important stylistic and cultural period of American history. Facts far eindinas: Per the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, Section 2.24.090, the following findings are made per the landmark review criteria specified in that section, eiaEOrical and Cultural Sigaifictnce: Finding: The proposed landmark/point of interest ie particularly representative of an hiat oric period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: Representing both the Etiwanda citrus community and the importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and mass western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical ae rvices, and often a helping hand, the station and its owners were an Important part of the local area. Finding: The proposed landmark/point of interest is an example of a type of building which was on:•e conmon but is now rare. The proposed landmark/paint of interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. tact: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, including the Etiwanda area. Most of these roadside 9tetiona and garages have fallen out of use os been e6endoned or demolished. With their loss, physical reminders oP the evecyday patterns that characterized consnunity life sixty years ago are fading. 000114 riff. STAFF REPORT PEAFSON FILLING STATION August 26, 1992 Page 6 Finding: The pzc posed landmark/point of interest is of greater age than most of ~:s kind. Fact: Opening shortly after the con~letion of Aoute 66 in 1926, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage is one of the oldest such structures extant. Pinding: The proposed landmark/point of interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact: The Peazsor, family was and is deeply connected with the cultural and familial fabric of Etiwanda history. Fiadiaq: The architect or builder was important. tact: Hui lder Henry Kl unman was one of the more talent and significant local builders to mark the pages of the area's history books. 2. elatorlc ArcAltactusal tad Lngineasing SSgalticance Finding: The construction mate ria la oz engineering methods used in the proposed landmark/point of interest are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. Tact: The reserved, vernacular expression of the very popular Spanish Revival architectural Style demonstrates local interest in broader stylistic trends. 3. Neighborhood and Gaograpbic Sattiag Fiadlnq: The proposed landmark/point of interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighhozhood. Fact: At the Foothill Houlevazd and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the station is Che only remaining link to an important element of local history and to an epoch of our national expe rience. Nithout it, all physical traces of that portion of Route 66 will be lost. Finding: The proposed landmark/point of iota cast in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Faci: For over 65 years, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage has been a community resource and its oaners, the Pearsons, Stevens, and Myexs to name a few, added to the co~mnunal experience of the Etiwanda area. C. Flioih111iv; Only the National Park Service in collaboration with the State Ristoric Preservation Officec can formally list a structure on the Register. But as a part of this review, staff has reviewed the Pearson Filling Station and Garage per [he Register Criteria. Staff finds the structure eligihle under sections A and C of [he fact that "The quality ppp115 HPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 7 o£ significance in Ame ricer. history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present ir. districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: A. That ar9 associated with events that have made a significant contribm:ion to the broad patterns of our histo zy; and... C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction." D. Issues: The property owners requested the inmiediate demolition of the canopy o£ the Pearson Filling Station and Garage due to the puzpozced demands placed upon them by Cheir insurance company in light of the street improvements required by the Foothill Marketplace project. In a letter sent to the City, attached as Exhibit "HPC-3," the owners expressed that in their opinion, the structure lacked any "historical value." It appears then [hat the owners would object to staff's findings in support of a landmark designation. Thus, in accordance with the Commission's policy on owner objection, staff has reviewed the structure 6asetl on the policy's three neceaaa ry findings, that the atruct ure is: listed on the Clty'a inventory, stands out as having outstanding historical architectural, and cultural significance; and that designation as a landmark could help protect it through the environmental review prose sa required under CEQA. E. P.nvi ronmenr al As..e.<smnnr; Any future landmark designation would be exempt from CEQA under Article 19. Section 35380. If the Cortmdsslon concurs xi[h staff that the structure is significant to the community's heritage, then the proposed demolition as requested negatively impacts this resource. The demolition permit request can be considered a project under CEQA because it is an activity involving an action, issuance of the demolition permit, by a public agency.( Staff has evaluated the st ructure per the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and on National Register criteria. After completing the Initial Study, staff has Eound that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on identi Eied cultural resources that cannot be mitigated Eully (please see attached Exnibit ^HPC-6," Initial Study, Parts I 6 II). Although only an application for a perndt to demolish the canopy of the 9t curt ure has been submitted at this time, staff asserts that thin act would adversely impact the at ructure for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the pone coche re (canopy( acts a9 the major architect oral element that announces the building's use--that of a gas station, Even without the pampa, there is little mistaking Che statement that Lhe canopy makes architecturally and functionally. Nith the removal of the canopy, the structure would lose Sts 1Please refer to ~¢de, Section 21065 and GlliflelineH, Sections 15378 (a) and 15352. pp0116 NPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 8 most distinguishing and prominent feature. Secondly, if permission were granted to demolish only Che canopy and since such an undertaking would reduce dramatically the structure's significance, there would be little impetus to preserve the remainder of the structure. Moreover, such a partial demolition-- literally chipping away at a building's significance--goes against the intent of our City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and CEQA and potential national register eligibility. Although this demolition permit has been requested separately, the structure's proposed destruction could be seen as being tied to future development plans. Case law pertaining to what is known as "splitting" a project under CEQA has created a significant precedence for reviewing the potential negative effects of a proposed project with the project itself.2 Therefore, to conforn to legal procedures, the preferred course of action would be to wait until a commercial project was submitted for this site and then to review any and all environmental impact, including those to cultural resources, as Dart of that project. Since the property owners applied for and received a received a zoning change on this parcel, from Radium Residential to Con®unity Commercial, and considering the future dray of the Foothill Marketplace project, it seems highly likely the site will be redeveloped in the near Future. Staff would thus recortwend two options at thin time: that 1) either the approved portion of the i~tovements in their ultimate location be installed or 2) that the City Council accept interim improvements and thus not alter the current configuration of the northeast aide of the Sntersectior. until the time when the respective property owners are ready to submit a project on the site (please see Exhibit "HPC-9" for diagrams). NSth both options, staff feels that if the st ructute will be vacant, a security fence should be installed around it and the building should be secured Lo the highest standards. The City Engineer has indicated this exception to the City's improvement policy i:i acceptable because installing only a portion of the curb return and the signal in their ultimate location will not necessarily make the intersection any more viable at this time. If the applicant still desires to demolish the canopy portion of the structure, staff finds that the only way to pe chaps mitigate the inq~act would he to relocate the nnt~ra a ~ safely inside the right-of -xay and in correspondence to City setbacks and to maintain its current configuration and re lati onahip [o the streetscape. This move would be in coordination with the the State Ni stozic Preservation Officer (SHPD) to ensure that LDe structure's National Register eligibility would not be compromised. It this relocation were not con templatetl, staff feels that the demolition request would require the completion of a Focused Environmental Impact Report (E IR), refer to the Cede, Section 15063 (c)(3), In order to best analyze the potential of adaptively reusing and thus preservi nq the structure, this EIR would include a feasibility study whose recommendations woultl be implemented per CEQA. This FeasiDil ity Study would be monitored and approved by the City Dut paid for by the applicant. The only way to allow fox demolition of a part 2P lease refer to Ozinda Aean. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 182 Cal. App. 3d 1195 (1986), Laurel Heights, supra, q7 Cal. 34 376 (1988), Citizens Assn, for Sensible Development of Biship Area v. County of Invor supra, 172 Cal. P11. 3d (1985), and City of Antioch v. City Council, 187 Cal. App. 3d (1986). 00011r~ HPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 2E, 1992 Page 4 or the whole of the structure xould then be for the City Council to make a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" after their review of the EIR, The Council would Dave to find !hat the benefits of the demolition project outxeighed the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, and thus finds these adverse effects "acceptable,^ (Cede, Section 15093 (a)). r_or_O AEC~Nr_E; This item has been advertised in the Inland yallev nai iv Bulletin, property owners xi[hin 300 feet of the project site have been notified, staff has inspected [he property, and the property's owners are aware of this review process. ARCOMMENDATION: Staff ICC Onmle nda that the COmmi99ien f0 iwa id t0 the City Council a recommendation for landmark designation for the Pearson Filling Station and Garage. Staff also recommends that Che application to demolish partially the structure be denied and that the Commission recommend that the City Council direct staff to continus to work xith the applicant in order to secure the site without any demolition and/or xaive the ultimate traffic signal location policy in this unique case. If however, the applicant still desires to demolish the canopy and thus seriously and irrevocahly reduce the significance of the structure as it has been presented to you in this report, staff recommends the preparation of a Focused EIR. Respectfully Sub tied, ~~^ Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner. BB:AMN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Landmark Application with Photographs Exhibit ^HPC-2" - Site Plen Exhibit "HPC-3" - Letter from Barry Vantiger, et. al. Exhibit "HPC-9^ - Curb a Signal Diagrams Exhibit ^HPC-5" - Initial Study, Parts T i II Resolution Recommending Approval 00~ + 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Ap pl is at ion for HISTORIC LANOYARR DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNA7ION X Historic Landmark H<storic Point of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1. Common Name: Dvane's Service Garane 2. Historic Name, if known: pearson Garace & Filling 5tat'on 3. Street or Rural Address: 12912 Foothill Aouleva zd C Sty: Fa nc ho Cucamonga Zip: 91739 County: San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-161-02 2ooe~ Commercial Legal De script ion: 5 1/2 SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SEC 4 TP 15 4. Present Owner, 1f known Charles V. Cunvninylddrese: 1645 N. Laurel Ave. C Sty: Upland 21p: 91756 OwnernDip Ss: public private 5. Preaemt Uae: Vacant Original Vae~ Filling StdtiOn 6 Garaqe Otber pact uaea~ None DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the Dreeent D e1ca1 • stance of the Bite or structure and tleec[SD! gay wJor a teratlpoe ram St• orSglnal cosditfon: The structure is a former service station 6 yarage. The large rectangular, concrete, single story building has a three-bay pone cocheze. There are mature trees fo the east of the structure. The roof is flat hio '!. Location sketch map (draw a label site and aurtounding streets, roads, and pramloeet Ladmarke): Q A Z 3 ~~~u- 841/p . ~___._- N S. Approximate property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontage Deptb or approx. aczeageT B. Condltlas: (check one) a. Exce llebt_ D. Good c. Pair X d. Detez iorateo_ e. No longer 1o exlatence_ 10. Ie the feature: a. Altered?_ b. Unaltered? X 11. Surrousdiege: (check more than one 1t neceuary) •. Open land b. Residential X c. Scattered Duildinga_X d. Densely built-up e. Commercial X f. Industrial g. Ocher ~.x++IP t T ~+R- - I a 12. Threats to Site: a. None known- b. Private development X c, Zoneng d. Public works Project X e. Vandalism X f. Other_ 13. Deter o1 enclosed phot ogrnph(s) Ma~~ 1991 !TOTE: The fo13ow1oR tItems 14-18) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior bu ilding materlnl: n. Stone- b. Brick_ c. Stucco X d. Adone_ e. Hood X f. Other Cc, mete 15. Is the Structure: a. Op Its orig iv1 site? X b. Yoved? c. Unkvown? 16. Year of Inlt ial Coo etruction: 1926 This Date is; a. Factual b. Estimated X 17. Arc ^ltect (if koawo ): unknown 18. Builder (if knowo ): }{gNrN ~.SISVy1p1A 19. Related Features: a. Barv b. Carriage aquae c. Outaou ae d. Saed(e) e. Pareal Gar deo(a) f. Ill edmill g. Ilatertower/tankhovae b. Other Trees 1. Nooe SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state slat orical and/or archit eetural importance (include daces, eventc, and persona aatociatatl with tae site when koown ); The service station was originally owned by John "Doc" Fearson s Lee Stevens who were brothers-in-law S sold gas for au[omo6iles s also distributed gas to the local farmers. The scat ion is located along the former Route 66 S during the 21. Ya In theme of tae slat oriv resource; (check only one): a. Architecture X b. Arta k Leisure c. Econamlc /Induct rlal 3 d. Cmvernmevt e. Exploratloo/Settlesent f. YS11L ary g. Re llglov h. Social/Educat SOn 1 22. Sources; Liat hooka, documents, auryeya, personal interviews, nvd their dates: Hickcox, 2iwanda: Th F'rc 100 Years 1981. Interview: Bob Hickcox, March 26, 1992. Mrs. James Clark, March 26, 1992 6 August 17 1992. 23. Date form prepared August 1992 By (name): Vince Be rtoni/Anthea Nartio Address: 10500 Civic Center Dr. City: Rancho Cucamonga ZiD: 91729 Phone: 1714) 909-1861 Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga ++f~- I b 20 ADDENDUM - DUANE'S SERVICE STATION Description ?6 with red, barrel rile for both the but ld inn 6 pone cochere. The rile :oof on the north eieva tion has been removed 6 replaced with asphalt shingles of a matching color. A skylight with six canes has also been added to the middle of the hiu roof on the north elevat tor.. The none cochere bases are constructed of ooured concrete. The north s south bases had two pumps each s the middle base had one pump, which all have been removed, The columns are seuare 5 unadorned with slightly flared capitals. The Hain garage is constructed of slip-fcrm ooured concrete 6 the ooate cochere is of wood frame construction with thick cement stucco. The walls are currently painted white with red accent under the eaves. There is evidence that the walls were once painted red, mustard 6 navy blue at different times. The fenestration pattern of the structure is as follows: North Elevation: The door (approximately 6 1(2 feet high) has been removed and the opening has been hoarded up. There are two - 20 paned windows side-bv-side to the east of the door on the north elevation. A metal orate has been added to the windows. The six panes in the center of the windows open outward. South Elevation: The door is under the pone cochere. It is a sirq le door :ai th a single-pane window. Above the door is a single-pane window and there are sinyle-paned, wood framed windows to the left and right of the doors. The window to the left is boarded over with metal grates. The six panes in the center of the windows open outward. East Elevation: There are two windows, spaced approximately ten feet apart, that have 20 panes. Both windows are covered with metal grates. The six panes in the center of the windows open outward. West Elevation: There is a 20-paned window on the south side covered with a metal grate. The six Danes in the center of the window open outward. There is a small service bay on the west elevation and a larger service bay on the south elevation. The service bay doors on the south elevation are constructed of 2 1/2 inch vertical Siding with 5 1/2 inch boards spaced 4 1/2 feet apart. There are three decorative hinges on the top of each of the sliding doors and rite 5 1./Z inch boards are cut to a point, on the base board, The sl id irg doors are nn a track mechanism that is 5ti11 in place. There are two - 15 inc'n concrete butt ressesr one on each side of the service bay doors. There is one gooseneck light above the right service bay door and there is one gooseneck lrght to rite right of the service bav doors. The small service bay on the west elevation has double wooded doors is constructed o' 2 1/2 inch vertical siding on the top and 6 inch horizontal siding on the bottom. There are small wooden decorations on the ton corners. The door corners are rounded. There are also two - 18 inch concrete buttresses, one on each side of the service bay doors. Centered aheve the doors is a gooseneck light. 0001:1 }.~ _ ~ ~ ADD£NDDM - D'vANE'S EERVIC£ STATION Description ".2G Depression, immigrants would spend the night in their cars on the site because they had no other place to stay. The station also served as a gathering place for local residents. Local citrus grove owners would come to the station when it was co13 6 would wait for the thermometer to drop below freezing 6 return to the groves to take care of the freezing crops. While they waited they would gather around the radio for entertainment. Highway patrol officers would also gather at the service station. oearson 6 Sevens eventually sold the station to the Meyers family. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMrillSSION LANDMARK SURVEY AP# ia~y,~~ of -- Address: ~ 2917 E'OOTFiLL MDUS EVARD View i,ooking ^sm .Date of Photo MAY 1991 ~~ 1 {~i ,,,,,T„ .Date of Phow MAY 1991 VIeW LookEOg - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APk 1t 00-t61-02 r' ' 1124 ~' 1~ ViEWLO01(lfl$ SOUTx , U8hOI1'tlOtO MAY 1991 View Looking unxmx Date of Photo xnv too, , HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY AddteSS: 12912 FOOTHILL nOULEVhRD APN 1100-161-02 View Looking ur .Date of Photo Mnv , oo, n - - .Tr ' I rG" ~q View Looking wasm .Date of Photo nnx 1991 IIISTORICPRES ~~ Address: 1 ~ VAT1pN C01vIIvIISSIOIJ LA zeiz ~oomnzLr sovMARK SUR V$Y .. E'uARD APp 110011 D0-16 ~~ 0 s.;..... . -.. ,~ 4 View Looks ~ g HORm~EA" ~~' I I~ .Date of Photo MA~~ ,cw igpking ~--~--____.,. ~~, Date of Photo '-_-1 / - f, ._r_ L.. ~ . , t, j T < i ~__~ -- /~ .\\ j i ~ry ~. 0~ ~~ ~~ ~/ ~.~ti..-, , _ , :~~~ ,__. \~ u ~~~~N ^ ~ ~ 2 \ i < W `ti!r ;r Y \ ~ / / r ~: J ~ _.__~..__ OW ~____~ ______ ____Off_ J / ~~~ P S~ N~]~65 ~ I 1 \J ' i CI A z ~~ L ~- J z i7o s ` i. f -1 ~ ~ Z K ~ u ~ / .~ ITEM: EXIST~r,10~ Sly PLAN rm.E:LD q2-OZ N EXHIBIT: ~IfL'~.SCALE:I„=1~ 000127 ~i-(~, - 2 J~zlY 30, 1552 Ci<y of Ranci,o Cur_amonga Cr+rtiu~u ni :y Levelopment, Department i05J0 Civic Center Urive Ranr_hp Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: 3033 W. Foothill (NE Corner of Etiwanda & Foothill) The purpose of this letter is to request a determination of *.he l ar_k of anY significant hieto ricai value with regards to the ~,rucLure located at the above refarenced address. This request ie made in conjunction with application for demolition of the existing canopy in order to accommodate the widening of the intersect iris and placement of new traffic lights. If there ie any additional information required or eny 9uestior,s concerning this request, please contact Barry Vantieer at 933-4321. Mr. Vantiger is authorize4 to represent all owners With regards to this matter. A complete title and vesting is attached for your reference. + ''Re//spectfully~, ~ ~ `~ WSlliam Obe rhauser, Truetr_e Harry antige rustee 1648 Laurel Ave. 2177 N. First Ave. Upland, CA. 91786 Upland, CA. 91768 lRiarles V.~ dummine 1645 N. Laurel Ave. Upland, CA. 31786 repreeenr,ing .Tohn Fo hal, Trustee 17331 eirie tip land, CA. 91736 attaCt,ment 000128 ~x~e,-t- ~. - 3a Tale and vesr,ine for: 4033 W. Foothill Bivd, Fontana, CA. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91733 Aeseeor"e parcel number 1100 161 02 Portion S 1/2 SW 1/4 SW i/4 SEC 4 TP 15 Census Tract: 6 71 2000 li BARAY VANTIGER, WILLIAM OBERHAUSER and CORAL L. STRATTON, as Trusteee of the Gemmel Pharmacy Group, Inc. Shsreholdera' Trust, dated June 22, 1990 as to an undivided one-t},ird interest, 2) JOHN ROHAL and JACflUETTA LOUISE ROHAL, as Trueteee of the ROHAL FAMILY TRUST, eetabliahed by Declaration of Truet dated April 5, 1983 as to an undivided one-third interest, 3) WILLIAM J. OBfiRHAUSfiR and CARBON SUE OBERHAUSER, Cri-Trusteee of the OBERHAUBER FAMILY TRUST dated .June 19, 1977, as to an undivided one-third intereet. OpU129 3-~ ~~ aa4~ Q~ ~I k1 ~ sidntet. ~_ ~us~ss~r ~rrlru. eu~ L n-~) dl ¢ ~ u~Ztw~ su~c- ~~ I ~[IbN ~ l ITEM: l-•D. ~12-D2 TTT1E:'PP.¢TG4 v~'T1v~n,n"T'~ ~ Re y Sl N4l_ EXHIBR: gSCALE: N~Ac~ 000130 K~ ~tl SSE aF P~/t° M6-,~T-7b BE it/a HRH a~C ~oN 2 PcwTlor~ A~ ~frca ~Wp GWiESr ~~rn10~. j~c.sa tfF7- zvR+~/ t.d.res r CII ITEM: L ~ D , q2 -d Z TITLE: ~Xl STl i~/~ /N ~ ~a7 ]Y Cu,Rb .S~4Nd~ toc EXHBIT: }jSCALE: ~t( F~ pp0131 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City pclicies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application 6e provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT EE PROCESSED. Please note [hat it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of eubnuttal; city staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. GBLYEAIU. INPOMIATIO[1 Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: HMO[-/ - TON PERMl7' /N GWJUIRRENCE WITH G14NDhk1RK DES/br. 9x02 Project Title: Pp~~ [.aLl./Q 7f-/~ )~~-~/~/ FLLUN& 'Ri77QNNR.o4E Name 6 Addreee of project owner(s): ~4RY VANT/i~E.4 ~.GtA~ /~.3 N• ENGL/D ,OVG., Oh/TArf2/0 , C.4 9 / 76 2 Names Address of developer or project sponsor: Contact Person 6 Add[ess: So71'Y12 ~ L{.V~~ Telephone Number: 9f~-~?.~ Names Addreee of person preparing this Lorm (1L dlfCarsnt from above): A'. M • ffA-+4T/6.r ~ ~oMMUNl7Y i~/6LOPI~4~IT' Dr< ~ !~. j`f OF !~/~GHfl GuC.411-fONb~4- R D. BoX 80T R,oNatlo Guy-,ewfoWfaA , Ch g172y Telephone Number: 1(Gj - 989- 1 ~OI C I T Y o f R A N t~C~..~: C U C A M O N G A 0) Includ± n deacriptien of all permits which will be nec¢ssnry from the City o£ Poncho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: ~(~A~N4 PE'RM+T /~R DEMDU7TD~/' IF LIES/g. /V4TF~ /~ LU'-KC.tin/D~^tid?1'C~ /2 GA1.1DMdWG ~ (.Tla Fzd770A1 ~R ~.tIT NrOI.t.LD ~r~'V f~E NF.GOFA 9) Describe the physical setting of the site na it eziata before the project including Snformntion on topography, Boil arability, plans and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing atructuraa on Bite (including age and conditien) end the use of the structures. 7lttaeh photographs oY significant fentures deacrlbed. Sn addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeologitel surveys, traffic studies): pGE~' sEE ,47'R~H60 sT~r°F ~RT~.' [.. b. y2 -D2 ooos~ ~a 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of Snformation (books, published reports and oral history): pLE~GE REF'8~2 7b S'GY1PF 2U~~2'~ tb(L ~.D.9z-oZ 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels Ghat now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) end hor trey will affect proposed uses: ~~~ 1Z) Describe the proposed proieet in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in Lora of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there ere proposed phases for fleoelopment, the extent of dewlopmsnt to occur with each phase, end the enticipeted completion of esch lncresent. attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: pc.~-cSE Re~~ Ta sm~ aE~)er ~e_ L. o. 92-02 000134 13) Deacrlhe the surrounding properties, including information on ?iants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land ~:_ ;residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fam':y, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, se[beck, rear yard, etc.): PL.~ASE REPF~,2 ?b 3-CL1~c~~jdj~- fBl2' t•r~.~2-r.~'z 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, seals or character of the surrounding general area of the project? y ~~ . 15) Indicate the typo of short-tars end long-terms noise to to generated, tncluding source and aa:ount. Wow viii thane noise levels affecC adjecent properties and on-site uses. Whet asthoda of sound proof inq are propoaedl ~0~~ •16) Sndlcata proposed rasovala and/os raplacessnta of sature or scenic tr•ee~s: iv~~ 'OD0135 SG 17) Indicate any bodice of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: iB) Indicate expected amount of re ter ueagn. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucaaanga County Water DiattlCt at 987-7591. A / A a. Residential (gnl/dsy) , V e`akL~aee (gal/day) b. commercial/Ind. (qal/dny/ec) Peak use (gel/mtn/ec) 19) Indicate proposed a:ethod of sewage di appeal. Septic Tank Sewer. it septic tanks are propoaad, attach percolation teats. xf diacherga to a eanl4ry aerage ayatm Se proposed indicate expected daily aewege generation: (sea Attachmnt A for uaaga estimatae). Por further clarification, please contact the Cucasonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/dny) b. xnduatrisl/commercial (gal/day/ae) Rc9xD>~rlat PRtA76Cf$ N/~ 20) Number of reeidentiel unite: Detached (indicate range of parcel sized, ad nimuw lo[ size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or [or Gale unlta): 000136 Sd 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents; Sale Price(s) S to Rent (per month) S to 22) Speci `.y number of bedroosm by unit type: N/f1- 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 2a) Indicate the expected number of school children vho rill be residing within the pro~tat: Contact the appropriate school DLstrlcts as shown in Attachment B: a. ELementary: b. Junior Xigh: c. Senior High: CdsOfMC1AL, IND08TRjAL AtD I118TI19lIOw71i. PIOTRTB 25) Describe type of use(s) and me jor function(s) of co~srclal: industrial or institutional uses: 26I Total Cloor area of commercial, industrial, of institutional uses 6y type: 000137 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: TeCal: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide 6reekdown of anticipated job claaeificatione, including wage and Salary Yengea, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each claasifieatlon (attach additional [heat if neceaeary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers [o De hired that currently raeide In the City: •31) Por coaveercial and induatrlel uses only, Sndlcate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should ba writied through the Scuth Coast Air Quality Management DietricL, at (e iBl 572-6283): ALL PFIDJ[I3'tl 321 Mave the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies nerving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate [heir reeponee. ND~vE ~v~~T~D Qoasser.~.~' 33) In the known history of this property, has the re been any vas, sto rage. or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or Loxic materials include, Dui are not limited to PCS'at radioactive eubatancea; pestieldes and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their uee, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of uee, iE knorm. ~~~ ~~ 3<) Nill the proposed project Snwlve the temporary Or long-term uee, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic sabrlals, Sncluding but not limited io thoas examplaa listed abooeT If yea, provide sn inventory of all such materials W De used and piopoaad method of disposal. The location oL ouch uasa, along with the atarags and ehipmsnt areas, shall be shown end laGled on the application plans. I hereby certify that the atatemanLS furnlahad above and in the attechad exhibits preasnt eha date and information raqulnd [or adagwta avaluatlon of this project to the bast o[ ry abllLty, chat the facia, atatamants, and information pressnUd era trva and correct to the bast of ry knowladga and belief. 2 further undaratand that additional Lnforsatlon say M raquirad eo De submitted baton an adaquaG avalwtion can b• soda by GM C1ty o! Poncho Cucamonga. Date: ~ 2 Slgnaturat Titles 000139 5 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (Part II - Initial Study) ~. HaCICGR00ND 1) Project Name• /~/ p tj 2) Related file No.(s): G.D. 9Z-!J 3) Applicant: ~(J1Q~QY VAN-77bER~ ~-' Q Address: lcJ7~ /~/• EGGL/D.4~VE ONZ~f2/o, ~4 9/762 Telephone No.: 98 3 - 4 32l e) Repreaentatlve: S/l[M ~~ Address: Telephone No•: 5) project accepted ae complete (date): ZI. R7VIROMffiITaL I!@71018 Pura ua nt to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanaClon of the potential project Smpecte identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" are required on attached sheets. Explanntion shall also be provldeL in each instance where a potentially algnificant effect has been determined not So be significnnt and ie mnrked "NO". Yee Maybe No 1. EARTH. will the pzopoaal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes Sn geologic substructures (including slope failures, subsidence, falling rock, etc.)? 1/ b) Subs tential dl axupeion, fll splacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c) Major change In topography or ground eurfece relief features, ea thst the general slope and say of land will be e ignif scantly modified? 5h C I T Y o f R A N C QOQo14UC U C A M O N G A Yea Maybe No d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical featuresr e) Any increase in wind oz water erosion of soils, either or off the site? f) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, lands lidos, mode lidea, ground failure, or similar hazarde7 / 2. AIR. Will the proposed result in: a) An increase in air pollution levels ' in the area in excess of exiating sir pol'ution atandarde7 (Particulate matter (duet) ae well ae chemical polluianta should be considered.) / b) The creation of objectionable odora7 / c) The alteration of air movement, moisture, or CempereLUre or any change in climate, either locally I or reglonally7 -/ 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) The poaeibl lity of coniminating a public water supply ryataa or adversely affecting ground wster7 ~ / JL b) The conetruceion of etrueturaa or dl aturbanee of a flood plain, marsh or watercouzaeT c) chengea in ebeorption rates, drninage patterns, oz the rate and amount of surface [unaff7 __ / d) Alteretione to the couraa or flow of -- flood waterer V e) Alteration o[ the dlreciion or rote / o[ flow of ground waterer V f7 change 1n the quantity of ground peters, either through direct addltione or withdrawl s, or through intercaptiona of en aquifer Dy turn / or axcavatione7 000141 - 5 ~ 4 5 Yea Maybe No q) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies] / h) Exposure of people or property to / water related hazards sash as / flooding? PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) A substantial change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plena (including trace, shrubs, grass, trope, microfloza, and aquatic lants)? / p b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, raze or endangered species of plants? c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or results in e barrier the normal replenishment of existing apadcal d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? / / e) The removal f a tr ? / o ees ny (/ ANIMAL LIFE. WS 11 the proposal reaul! in: a) A significant change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animis (birds, land animle including reptiles, fish mA shellfish, bentAic organisms oz j insects)? _/ b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animle? 1/ c) Introduction of new species of animle into the area, or result in a barrier to the migration or aovamnt of animis? d) Deterioration to the existing fish or wildlife habi tail QOQ142 Yea Ma be No 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Si 9nifiean! in<reaee in ambient noise levels Por adjoining areaar ~~ b) The creation of duelling units for which the interior end/or exterior ambient noise levels exceed Federal, State or City noise guidelines? _/ c) Exposure of people to serve noise / leveler V 7• LZGRT AND GLARE. Will the proposal result. in: a) Tha 9enezatlon of light oz therms? pollution detecteDle Pram adjacent / propertiea7 b) The generation of nev light or glare? __ e. LAND DSE• Nill Lhe project result in: a) A disruption in ?fie orderly, planned development of the area? .__ b) An inconsistency with the plane end goela that have been adopted by the / City? ~_ .r- c) A significant change in the present land use, pattern, scale or character / V of the general aran7 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal tesulG in: a) The di eplacement or alteration of any unique natural or men-made f feature? __ _ b) An alteration in the potential use, extraction, of conservation of n / scarce or unique natural reeournT -__ ,_ __ cl Znczeaaa Sn the rata of use of any / natural resourcee7 __ d) SubatanlSel depleticn of any non- renewable natural reeourceaT ~ ,! _ QQp~.43 Yes MaybO No 70. CCMNUNITY. Will the proje et reau It in: a) The displacement of community / residents? / b) Onposi tion or controversy within the neighborhood or the community ae a who leT _~ - c) A detrimental effect on the community due to an i ffi i nsu c ent market? d) An undesirable precedent which would promote oz foci litate other projects that would crests eignlficant impecte - an the environment? - .J•L/ - e) An alteration in the location, diatriWtion, denai ty or growth rate / of the human population of an eras? _•1 /L - f) A detrimental effect on the existing housing or create a demand for additional housingt / 11. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. pill the proposal resu lt in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? / / b) 2ffecta on existing perking tacilitiea, ` or demand for new parking? / c) Substantial impact 'upon exi sting J tranapor[ation ryatame7 -- / d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of paopla and/or goods? V e) Al.teretiona to waterborne, roil or air / traffic? / f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor ~ vehic lee, bicyclists or pedaatriana7 OOQ144 JT-G Yes Maybe No 72. PUBLIC SERVICES. will the project result Sn: a) The premature provision of public services to the extent that service costs exceed benefits derived fzom the projects b) An alteration Sn existing and/or proposed services for any section of the City? c) The on-site disposal of solid or liquid wa etes7 d) A change in or a need for new or altered governmental services Sn any of the following areas: 1) Fire Protection? 2) Police Protection? -~L 3) Sehoolal 4) Parks/recreational facilitiee7 ~/ 5) Neintenance of pu611c [aci11t1ee, / including ronde7 / 6) Other governmental services? 13. ENERGY. will the proposal result in: a) The use of eubeiantlal amounie of fuel or energyT / / b) Substantial increase In Mmand upon exleting sources of energy, or require the devslopssnt o[ new sources of enargy7 14. UTIL ITICS. will the proposal result in: a) A need for new systew, or eubstentiel alterations to the following utilities: 1) Powsr or natural gas? ,/ 2) Communications systems? __ / 3) waterP / ~ )/ 4) Sewer end sewage treatment? ooos~~ ,5~ 15. 16. 17 18 Yes Maybe No ~-Y 51 _ Stott. wetaL drainagn2_ -~.~.~ ~+~-.- ~.ls~:::_~_ ~- ~/ S 6 SSd t d l was ) o e asposa ? RECREATION/OPEN SPACE. W111 the project result in: a) An encroechmeni into any recreational area or an area ozopoaed ae open apace 6y the City or any other juziediction7 b) An impeet upon the quality or qumtity of existing or planned recreational opportunities? CULTURAL RESWRCES. W111 the proposal result in: a) The alteration of oz the destruction oL a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? ~ - b) Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a historic building, structure, or object? c) The potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing rail gioue or sacred uses within the potential impeet awes? _~C AESTHETICS. X111 the proposal result in: n) The creation o! an aesthetleslly offensive Bite open to public view? SAFETY. Will the proposed pro~eet result in: a) The creation of an adverse or hazardous conditions should a lsndsllde, earthquake, / flood, or other natural disaster occur? r b) The application, use or di eposal of potentially hazardous mttarials7 J~oQi46 s~ Yes Maybe No c) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event / of an accident or upset conditions? _~/ d) Exposure of people to potential health hezards7 _ e) possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, aubeiantial ly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below below self euetaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare of endangered plant Or salmi or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehistory? _ b) Doea the project hove the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goalsa (A short-term Smpe<t on the environment ie one which occurs Sn a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will dndure well into the Euture.) c) Doas the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively cone idera61e7 (A project may impace on two or more separate resources where the impact On each resource Sa relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) \!/ d) Does the project have environmental of facts which will cause aubstential adverse eEEecb on human beings, either dl rest ly or indi rectly7 __ 00014'7 S"a III. DIBC9BSIOR ~ BMVIIq~i'AL 6VAL®xIQ1 (Attach additional sheets wit-h~''dn~ajr/rative description of environmenia'l/~~~'~'~~~~+~^~~'y`'.. impacts. ) ~~i ~~~ ~~, GG/L'S~~ f~~ ~"~7NQ ~ Z~' U rv. DBxHIauNAxiD~e9Z _ J "' ~ • v (TO he completed Dy the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project cDULD NOT hnve n significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DHQARATION WILL BE PREPAR®. Z find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there rill not be a eignificant effect in this case because the mitigation meaeure9 described on an attached sheet hnve been added to the project. A NEGA7TVE DECLARATION WILL BH PREPARED. I find [he proposed project MAY hove a eignificnnt effect on the enoir nt, and en ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IE REQUTABD. Lo Au~lustA2 t-- e 9lgnat a For 1 _[_ \-~ 000148 Sr RESOLUTION NO. 92-04 A RESOLUT IGN OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF LAW MARK DESIGNATION NO. 92-02 TO DESIGNATE THE PEARSON /STEVENS FILLING STATION AND GARAGE, IACATED AT 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORICAL LANDMARK - APN: 1100- 061-02 A. Recitals. IiI The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed .~ application for Landmark De sl gnation No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application.^ iii) On August 25, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. fiii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Ncamonga ae follows: 1. This Con®isaion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 2 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard. 3. 9ased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facie: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: Representing both the Etiwenda citrus community and the importance of Route 66 !o American culture and folk to [e, the structure herkene back to an era of agricultural growth and mass western ml gratlon. Offering fuel, mechanical aervl cea, and often a helping bend, the station and 1Le owners were an important part of the local area. acQS~s NPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-OQ I.O 92-02 - PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type cf building which was once con®on but is now rare. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once covsnon Dut is nw rare. Fact: Gas station9 and garages from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, Including the Etiwanda area. Most of these roadside stations and garages have fallen out of use or been abandoned oz demolished. With their loss, physical reminders of the everyday patterns that characterized comwnity life sixty years ago are fading. Finding 3; The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact: Opening shortly after tha completion of Route 66 in 1926, the Pearson Ei llin9 Station and Garage is one of the oldest such structuzee extant. Finding 4: The proposed landmark vac connects3 with someone renown or important or a local pereonnlity. Fact: The Pearson family was and is deeply connected viih the cultural and familial fabric of Etiwande history. Finding S: The but ldet or architect was important. Fact: Builder Henry Rluaman was one of the more talented, competent, and ai gnificant local but ldere to mark the pages of this area's history books. B. Historic Architectural end Engineering SignlEicance. Finding 1: The construction materials az engineering mothoda used in the proposed landmark are unusual or eigni Eicent or uniquely effective. Fact: The reserved, vernacular 0xpxesaion of the very popular Spanish Revival architectural style demonstrates local interest in broader etylietic trande. C. NeighDOrhood and Geographic Setting. Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact: At the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwende Avenue intersection, the station ie the only remaining link to an Important element of local history and to an epoch of our 000150 HPC RESOLOTION NO. 92-Od LD 32-02 - PEAASON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 3 national experience. Without it, ell physical traces of that portion of Route 66 will be lost. Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact: For aver 65 years, the Pearson Pilling Station and Garage has been a community resource and its aanera, the Peareons, Stevens, end Myers to name a few, added to the communal experience of the etiwanda area. d. Hared upon substantial evidence presented to this Co®iseion during the above referenced public hearing on August 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2. 2d.a90 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant Co the Commie aion policy regarding landmazk deai gnntion over nn owner's objection, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and Eacte: A. It is the policy of the Historic Pzeaervation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga [o override the objection of an owner in recommending landmark designation when: Finding 1: The property is on the City'a Historical Inventory. Fact: Staff has reviewed the structure and listed it as a Potential Local Landmark (PLL ), Potential State Lanark (PSL), and Potential Listing on the National Register of Historic Places (PNR). Finding 2: The property stands out ae having outstanding historical, architectural, cultural, and/oz aesthetic significance. Fact: The important place of the citrus industry to our local area and, on a broader scale, of Route 66 and the westward migration in the 1930e, are evidenced by this modest, architecturally-intact community resource. Finding 3: Deai gnaiion could help protect it. Fact: Ae a local landmark, any subsequent alteretiona, including demolition, would have to be revieaed fully by the Comai eaion. 5. This Commission hereby finds that the pzoj act has been reviewed end considered for caeplience with the California Snvironmentel Quality Act of 1970, and thin deai gnaLion Se exempt from CHQA under Article 19, Section 15330. 000151 HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-04 LD 92-02 - pEARSON FILLING STATION Au9uat 25, 1992 Page 4 6. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Coami ssim hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Poncho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Covmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of August 1992, of this Landmark Oesi gnation application. 7. The Chairman of this Cosmisaion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992. By: arsha Meek Han airme AYES: A1aiER, BANES, e2LLINGS, COOPER, SCNMI VT, TESSIER NOES: NONE ABSENT: HASEVITZ pp0152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIO'7 MINUTES Special Meeting August 25, 1992 Chairman Marsha Banks called the special meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ristoric Preservation Commission to order a[ 5:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Couneil Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Hanks then led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Melicent Arner, Marsha Benke, Gene Billings, Ada Cooper, HoD Schmidt, Anne Teeeler COlA1ISSIONERS: ABSENT: Alan Nsakoltz STAFF PRESENT: earrye Henson, SL Ciyil Engineer, Anthea Bertig, Aeeoeiate Plannerr Larry Henderson, Principal Planners Scott Murphy, Aeeociats Planner . . ~ . . Shelley Petrelli, 9eezatary PUBLIC NEARING A Anehea Hartig, Aaeocinte Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Teeeler aekaA it the iraff is elgnals were already located in the ultimate location. HPC MINUTES -t- August 25, 1992 000153 application for Point of Interest or Landmark Oaelgnation, range of appropriate protect alterna[ivas, and level of appropriate mltigetione for the partial demolition of the structure. Tha actions and recommendetiona include the following: Landmrk statue, Point of Interest status, other project alteznetives, and/or mitigation meaeurea prior to demolition. Scott Murphy, Aeacciate Planner, replied that temporary signals had been installed approximately halfway between where the signals used to be and where they would be located ultimately. Chairman Eanks asked for clarification on the concern regarding endangerment of pedestrians Erom traffic at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard because there seems io be little, if any, pedestrian traffic at the Socation. Barrye Hanson, Sr. CSvil Engineer, stated this is a concern the property owner brought up, but it had not yet been aubstantlated by the Bngineering Division. Commi esioner Cooper gate ti oned why the improvements to the intersection would need to be completed prior to widening Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Hanson, stated that it is standard policy to finish off intersections a[ their ultimate location to ensure Lhe hardrare Beta placed in the proper position. Chairman Hanks opened the public hearing. Barry Vantiger, 2177 N. tat Avenue, Upland, one of the property owners, stated that becnuse of a aeries of events beyond their control ([he development of Hal-Mort and the eventual widening of Foothill Houleoard), they feel they hove been placed in a precarious position as fez ea developmnt or demolition of the building on their property ie concerned. He stated the properly is currently Ln use as a commercial operation. He nlso commented that they eventually want to develop the property, but they cnnnot do anything until a flood control dietr lct Se developed for the nren. He remarked that they are in favor of dame lltion because they feel it will occur eventually to make room for the widening of Aouie 66 (Foothill Boulevard). He eteted he thought it would be better to remove the building now end reconstruct it later with new materials (restoring it to ire original look) and that they would ba willing to do that. Comma esioner Schmidt eeked if temporarily fencing the canopy with chain link fence would help the currant trsflic situation of care cutting through the canopy. Mr. Vantiqer responded St would restrict hie current tenant's access to the building and it Se only s temporary solution. Gary Womak, 5366 evening Canyon Way, Rancho Cucaawnga, real eatet± broker, stated he hoe been working ai th the Gemmel Family on property during the rezou±ng Erom residential to commercial. He stated they favored the commercial zoning 6eeauae the eurcoundinq area ie commercially zoned and they felt [het residential xoninq of their property was out of place. He further commented they felt pnCaettlen traff lc would increase on the property when the nee ehoppi ng center ie complete which in turn would create a greater liability for them. Ne suggested leaving the building In tact, moving the canopy to the beck of [he bu11d1 ng, and reconatructing the canopy later. Ha eteted that, if HPC MINUTES -2- August 25, 1992 oocss~ the property is developed eventually, they will incorporate the building into the development at the time. He said, with the canopy being in the way of the ultimate right-of-way, it will likely result in the cancellation of the owner's Siabi li ty insurance which will then prohibit having a tenant in the building and result in a loss of income to the property caner. He coamented they expected increased traffic in the area because of the shopping center and they would like to gee the street and intersections widened now to accommodate that traffic. Chairman Banks asked if the owners of property have developed any concepts on what they will do with the property later. Mr. Womak stated that they had two or three preliminary site plans done when the property was rezoned and all of [hem utilized the building on the site. He stated but ldinga on corners have good visibility and he felt the building could be rehabilitated. Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Cowai ssioner Teasiez said she thought moving the canopy to the back could work and it would keep the building in tact- Chairman Banks clarified that if the canopy were moved to a position that did not face Aoute 66, the building would no longer qualify for National Register status. She elated if the entire building and canopy were moved together directly north (fecing Route 661 it would ati 11 qualify. Commissioner Arner stated she would not want the building to lose any of its authenticity. She also said she thought it could be a good tourist resource. Covmii asi on er Billings stated he had concern over moving the building and asked if it could even be done. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner replied it wea possible, but it would be very expensive. Commissioner Cooper commented she thought the street widening should be completed prior to altering the intersection. cheirman Banks stated she was pleased Uat the applicant remgni ud the structure ae an historic structure and was considering incorporating it into some development on the property. She expressed that she thought a mutunlly acceptable solution could be worked out between the City and the applicant. She had spoken to some of Lhe historical families in the Etiwanda area and she had been told of Che1r involvement in the Route 66 celebration. She was also informed that this filling oration was coneidezed quite unique and apeciel by Route 66 historians. She stated Chet it was her feeling the the station had ai gniEicance, to both the City and the applicant, end wished to explore the poeaibllity of obtaining National Aegi eter atatw. She remarked that adaptive reuse of the building was definitely possible. NPC MINUTES -1- August 25, 1992 000155 MOTION: Moved by Schmidt, seconded by Artier, unanimously carried 6-0-1, to recommend to City Council approval of Landmark Designation 92-02, the Pearson /Stevens Filling Station and Gara qe. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMM ISSIONEAS: ARNER, RANKS, BILLINGS. COOPER, SCHMIDT, TESSIEA NOES: COIMtI EEIONEAS: NONE ASSENT: COMM ISSION EAE: HASKVIT2 -carried Commissioner Tessier asked what would happen if the signal pales were not moved now. Mz. Murphy stated that the Commission had the option of leaving the poles in the interim location and then, upon development of the property, relocating or moving the building when the poles are moved to their ultimate location. Mr. Henderson stated that leaving the poles in the interim location creates no changes in traffic, liability, etc. Coma ssioner Tessier asked if a temporary berm could be installed to discourage traffic ftom cutting through the property, via the canopy. Mr• Murphy stated an asphalt curbing could be installed temporarily to eliminate the traffic problem: it would also alloy access to the tenant currently conducting bueineas in the building. Chairman Sanka asked who would be paying for Lhe Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIA). Mr. Henderson replied that it would paid for either by the owner on the northeast corner or by Foothill Marketplace property owners. Chairman Ranks commented that she did not want to back the current owners into e corner regarding paying for an EIS, etc. Decaux they are not currently ready to develop the property. She felt im~rovemente could wait until they were ready to develop. commissioner Cooper asked if the insurance company would continue to provide coverage for the building if the ultimate street improvements were not made now. Mr. Henderson stated the City hea racelved no documentation from the insurance company indicating they would cancel coverage. He remarkod that fencing the property seemed to be a viable alterna[iva because there is enough area on the a ire to accommodate circulation and access to the current tenant. He stated proper placement`of gates would secure iha property as well ae eliminate the traffic problem. HPC MINUTES -0- August 25, 1992 00^156 Chairman Benka stated ahe thought two-sided fencing would work to eliminate the traffic also. Mr. Nenderson said he did not think it has been demonstrated that demolition is the only alternative. He commented staff would like to see further studies done an the site. Commissioner Cooper asked if it was correct to assume that, if the aignala were not moved now, Foothill Marketplace would not be paying for the etraet corner improvements when Che ere completed later and that owners of the tilling station property would bare these costs totally. Hr. Henderson replied that was correct although the property owners would be responsible for certain development coats whenever they developed their property. Re stated that currently Foothill Marketplace is paying for the signals, curbs, gutters, asphalt, etc., and the filling elation property owners would be responsible to pay to rove the signals. Chairman Hanks asked if Poothill Marketplace could sat aside money In a trust end/ot bond to be used later to move the signal. Mr. Henderson said that was possible. Barrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer, atsted Chet City policy hoe always been to have the developer pay for the total signal SmproVamenta and then reimburse them with money from the tranBporLatioe fund. Ra stated met of the coat would be reimbursed Lo the developer. Ha further stated that in codes of property owner reeiatance, that particular property ornar would then bare the coat oP the improvements when they developed their property later. MOTION: Moved by Arner, seconded by Schmidt, unenimoualy carried 6-0-1, to recommend to City Council that the uliimete street ei gnel confi9urntion be delayed and remain in ahe interim lmcetion until the property owner on the northeast corner 1e reedy to develop their property and, if Council does not wish to delay the ultimate Location of the signals, Lhat s fowaed Environmental Impact Rapore and various other studies M prepared regarding the impact on the historic statue of the property. Motion serried Dy the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AANER, RANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCFBMZDT, TESSIEA NOESS COlBIISSIONER9: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1(ASKVITE -carried HPC MINUTES -5- August 25, 1992 ~~ 0 ~~ N C K O C L' C November 2, 1997 Nr. St Bade Craigo, AIA Acting Stara Historic PreeervatlOn Officer office of Historic Pzeeervat ior. P. O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94796-0001 ~~ ~( O 't' G ~1 i I - - --~ SVBJECf: ROUTE 66 PEAASON GARAGE AND FILLING STATION - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Oeaz Nr. Craigo: Thank you for your willingnsu to review the attached historLc ruourco survey forma and relatetl materials describing tM Route 66 Pearaon Garage and Filling Station Ln the City of Rancao Cucamonga. in brief, we would like to request that your office forward an initial opinion on the acid building's potential elLgibility for inclusion an the National Register of Historic Places end on how a proposed demolition of pert of tae building and/or iU teloeat ion would Lepaet thin potential eligib111ty. The Duildinq nppeara to meet the criteria of eligibility for inclusion in the National RegisGt of Hiatoric Plasma antler Criteria A and C. Along LM regional stretch of Foothill Boulevard, the roadeitle vernacular ChaC characurizetl the physical Lndscape of the original AouG 66 i• rapidly Deinq removed and replaced with a built environment very different in scale and intensity. The Pearaon Carage and Pilling Station remains in its original location on stet nbeck'a ^mot her road" a• a bst anNnt to CAL important epoch of American htatory and folklore. The station and garage repaunt a basically intact exempla of a aadest, roatlalde, and veo: nacular expression of tae very papa lar Spanish Revival architectural style roust r'~<ted by LM foremost local <onerector of the day, Henry Rluaman. Ae euchr LC may be eha only example of ifs building type to have retained as mueA of Lta original appearance and one of a handful of rapidly diuppearing Rluaman stzucturee. Etiwantla end cucamonga'e stretch of Route 66 was dotted with small and large, fwily-run wineries, a few dining utablishmanb, and apptoxLaately Eive qaa atatione. Of the tvo extant filling atatione, the Pearaon Garage i• tM betUC preserved and tM more Aistozically aignifieant. The proceu by which w have arrived at our request for your auietance is complicated and long. After a request 6y the bu lldinq'^ owned to demolish its canopy, most of which list in the ultimate right-of-way of Foothill Boulevard, staff completed a review of the garage/lilllnq station's aignifieance per our City Historic Presarvat ton Ortlinance and the cr testis of the National Register of Historic Plates and ana ly xed the environmental Lmpact of such demolition. At an August 75, 1997, meeting, the comnioion unanimously eoxurred that tM Pearson Garage antl Pilling Station clu rly met almost ell of tN criteria outlined in the CLty'^ Ord inanw and that the propoeeo demolition of the port-cochere would have an adverw impact on the building Lhet could not be mitigated Lally. Tae only way that tM Commlu ion found to sit igace cM MOyor Dennn 1 Stout Councllmembe! IJiOne Williams MOyor AO?em WllllOm 1 AlaMandBf ... Councllmembef POmelO J Wngnt JOCk Lam. AICP, Clty Manager Councllmember Chones J Baguet II ~. '..^,SCC Crv~: Ce^~er Give . PO 9oe B01 • Ronan Cucartango U of/Y0 . pt4)989~1851 . ~Ar . OQ0158 STEADE CAAZGO, AIA PEARSON GARAGE 6 FILLING :ATION November 2, 3992 Page 2 impact would ba to telocats Lha ant ire buiidinq safely outaida the right-of-way while maineaining its current eonfigurat ion and relationship to iu hietor is context, the at rest acape. Ne made the Commies ion aware roar such a move woultl first, among of her th inge, necass it ere your rw iaw of the building's eli9 ibil ity. The Commix ion thus recommended to the City Council that a focused Environmental Impact Report De prepared to aeeea• completely Che impact Lhe tlemolit ion request on Lhe building's significance. The City Council, briefly stated, was not convinced of the building's significance or et ability when they raviswed the proposed landmark designer ion nntl environmental aeeeeement documents et their October 7, 1992, meeting. Arguments were presented that the ports-eoehere element ws in poor structural condition and that it eventually would have to be removed pat [M ultimate and approved eonf iqucat ion o[ Foothill Boulevard. TMts wu aLO brief tliseuu ion an whether it was rusanab le to require era property owner to relocate eM building. The property owner suggested to both tM City Council and HUtoric Preservntion Commission the you ibility of cecanetruct inq the ports-coehera clamant of tM building to the north or seat face on the main •tructua. It was also presented that the Duildinq'• ports-cochara acu as <M major architsetural element Chat announce ehs building's use--that of a gas at ation. Even without the pumps, there i• litCls mtetakinq the statsaunt chat Cho canopy make arehiieeturally and funct Lanally. It was Qso discussed that tM rsquuNd dsmolit ion of tM pore-cocNte might impact the fsaslbtllty of a National der signet ion, even if tM you ibiltty sz istad to re-utaDliu the potter-cochara at a Leer dace. The Cliy Councii contlnusd their consideration of Chic matter until ac ly December. I have included a complete DPR-521 form, a blue-lined print of an serinl photograph with the future street improvements shown, and a few otMr suppo[t ing docununes. I apologize for tM immediacy of this request and appreciate any level of rev iaw you might qiw to thL matter bslore our Council rsconvena• on December 16. Agacn, cur request is to obtain a much inEOrmaC ion as you ibla with ouch short notice ere to the building's potential •1Lgibility for inclusion on the National Register of Hietaric Places and on how a proposed demolitlan of part of the building and/or its relocation would impact Lois potential eligibility. Thank you for your considertee attention. Please do not hesitate to call me at 17141 989-1861, extanaion 2251, or Auoe iate Planner Ant Ma Hart ig at exeena ion 2290, with any queries or concerns. Sincerely, CONMVNZTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNI NISI Brad Lr ~/ City Planner Att achment• cc: Mehw Hart Lq ' ~OQ'1J~ Sbe or GNihwrw - TM a!e-~ -on Aewsv 5lr. Na. I-131 - 1 - 1 OEIp11TMlM OR RAAKa An :QUTION MA55~_xAE R_ _fiNL Na. _-NR SUtw~ UTM: q L ~1 SLS xITA 1m C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY e D IDENTIFICATION pasha's Service Garace 1. Common nerve: 2. Niaoric name: Pearson Garage and Fill ino Station 3. $trNt or rural address: 12913 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Lp 91719 County sun aP.na~divn a. grgl number; 1100-161-G2 5. preLn[OWrler: ~~hd 1P~ 1 Adds/; 1665 N_ L.aLr Pl piEnne City Voland Zip 91786 Owrmrdrip y: PuMk Fivne v 0. -rewnt Ur: vacant OriPInM uM: a' ommt+it s rvi +tfnn DESCRIPTION 7a. ArNitarturM aryls: Vernacular Spanish Revival 7b. Briefly dacdbe tM pnxnt pnpka/ ppransa M tM uta a a[na:tun and dMrri6a arty majo/ albratione 1rOm its aginM Landitbn: The structure is a farmer service station and garage that only recently changed from this use; thus the epntial requirements of this use are clearly expressed on the structure's exterior. The main portion of the structure consists of an open beamed garage bay accessed from the south Dy two large sliding doors and from the went by two tall hinged doors, all constructed of wood and appearing to be original; and at its southwest corner an office spnca exists which is accessed Dy a single, standard size door. At one lime, the north aide of the garage was also entered through a leige opening covered wilh a wood door, but it nos since been removed and the opening covered with planks. Extending from the office bay is a flat-roofed, three-bay ports eochere, perpendicular to the road (Route 661, which defines clearly the atructure~s use as a filling station and is supported by six aubelnntial, square, and unadorned columns with slightly flared capitals. The entire canopy structure is framed in wood and covered in stucco, including the columns. Thick pour concrete walla of Lhe single story garage/office 6ayn support a wood-framed, flat hip roof etruccure that is covered by red barrel tiles. Tne replaced wish asphal< (congl CAnnrut[IOn dau: Enimadd Factua ..:~ Y Artldtaa xenry ftlvsra^, 10. BuilMr 11. Approx. Properly Nn bn 4e• Fronta5a WptR - Or aPprex. !crlaie = a ' 12. ~Calalel OI eM10Md pn01 ~q• ea Mdv :'i'!: .. . OFR 5231Rw. 11/551 000160 11 Condhion: E:elNnt -Goad ~ fair_~ Dyanors[M _ No longer . .xirtanu 71. Altaratidla: Minor doer ~gmoval. oartial - f' d k 1 ght _ li Surtawtdngs: (Cheek mon than one if netauaryl Open Iand _Saaand DuiWinga ~- DmWy builtup Rwidamial x IrquatriN _Cormmaroial~ONer: 16. Thnam to ai»: Nona krawn__Priva»dawloPment~ 2oninq_~ ya.Walism public Works project ~ ONy: 17. h Na nructurc On is original u»7 _~ Movad7 _ Unkrrown7 18 RNatad hnmy: Snma ma ~r lan ds caoing SIGNIFICANCE 19. BrieXV rata nirtoriul and/or armitae[urN importanq (ifxluM darn, awns, atq nanena aaaoeiatatl wiN Na ai[a.l The service station was built _.-, 1929 by an important local contractor, Hen:~~ renowned concrete man, for John .t Xlusman, "Doc" Pearson and Lee Stevens who were Drotn2rs-in-law. The pair sold gas Eor automobiles as well as distributing it and other petroleum products to the local citrus ranchers. After a short time, Mr. Pearson alone owned the station and provided a full complement of automobile-related services. Located along Route 66 which had been completed in 1926, the station was a frequent atop of Deptession- era immigrants who would spend the night in their cars on the site with Doc'e permission because they had no other place to stay. plao at Lhat time, Mr. Pearson gave gas away to Lravell ers who simply could not pay. P.S. Pearson Clark, Doc's niece, recalls one of the more autatanding humanitarian efforts exhibited by het uncle. A "bunt Bowl" family had completely run out of money when they reached Etiwanda. It seems one of their sons had a lovely voice, so lovel in fact that the family was moving from Oklahoma to poll y Mz. pearson, after hearth the bo Ywood so he could be ^discovered." family citrus pack xng house and ra ised9enoughnmoneyaformtheryoungnboytand his famylyn's to continue their travels. ICOrt{,~ I0. Main theme o/ Na nirtoric rawum: III mtq Nan orr is Hacked, numbs m oMw of impottanu.l Arrhitattu» Ara 8 Laiau» Emtromic/IndwtriN ~Explortltidn/SnNmant ~_ Goyrnmam Mili»ry RNiggn SoaNlEdtaation 3 21. Sourcy ILirt books, dotaatwn0, aWNyt, paronN intarvilWa and dNir da[wl. Hickcox, Etiwende; The Pirat 100 Years, 1981. IntetvieWl Bob Xick cox March 26, 19931 Mrs. James Clatk, March 26, 1992 and Auqus[ 17, 1992. Los Angeles Co's City Directories, 1940, 1945- 1946, 1948-1949, 1951. Y1. Da» form Waparad Avouat wv By lrymN vonce Bertoni/anth Organization C1 tv of Rancho ~ amonpa Adtlrap; 10500 Civic Center D[iv City Rancho Cucamonae Lp 91730 phi (7141 989-1861 Logtiotup akatH maO ldraw arq IaGI u» and atlroutdirq aray/, roads, and praminant IalMmarksl: /~ uneru MASTER FILE HIST^RIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING f^SET NOTE: Tb numbs in pnrmaua irM._..e eitbr tpe numbr b amned or tM ntapwr d lion drt mrv b Merkur, 1, Ser. No. 1'39 1 1 City Zip 111 Farm No. 1141 Prep. No. 1041 USGS Duad Mm No. Iq 2452 of cbracan Ilaaert, num...n, punctuation mu W, soaoal mn may 1D. gegisaation 5bnp 111: -11 IiaHd -dell 181 _II may beoma Nigide _21 dearmined Nigide - -51 Nigiple lord liaonq veer 121 _81 inNigide far appva $31 appear aligide _71 unwbr`--~ 2. UTM Zona (21 Eartin 101 Npnhinq (71 A I I ~I >~2~ ~~7d ~1D0 11. Proparcr Given Rapatradon SHaa a (l l: 0 C -11 Part of ditaigt D ~ZI iMividuN WoPer9/ -31 i»tlr of apps 3. Prowrty Name: Common Nama 1301: 12 NR Clan Ggagory 111: Duane's Servace Station Hinaic Nama 1101: Dear=o C. d 'll' Pargl No, (017) 1100-161-02 1. Addrea: 12912 FapLpjjl Boule vard Numbr I ' I tent Naar 14p1 _Etiwanda avenue Nom[ Gou Stmt 10-201 ~$ ucampnpa fer ~ ip'nall t' d 1 City own I ~ZDI 91730 Vicinity of ZiP Coda 151 CiN/7own (~ County 3•Htbr dnignaty 131 S9D 5. Type of OwroMiP (141: 11 unknown 21 ledral 31 stall G Pretant Ub I1 AI: _11 unknown _21 commercial 31 Hpden0al %11 privab 51 eaunry _81 city _ 71 tpadN dietriet .JLII Drivab nonebnm. 51 pubic _81 norr 7. yur of Imnal Cpmtrucdan: Individual ProartY Ill 1929 Diana 181 8. Arrhitectlt110-151: --Unknown _] I dfatrkt - No. of proarnn 10.31 _219b ~L31 puildin9 _11 awctun _51 otdact 13. Omer Raytaauon (0.91 _11Hiataric Am. 914 Survey %S) GI. Nitbrital Undmark _21 Hlttonc Am. Enq. RIe. .~C)1 County h of Mitt Inbnn _31 NaaaN Hiat La.rdmtrk,L9) Local Lifting _II Sob Niatarie Park _91 County/RlgonN Park _51 otnv 11, Pronerry Attritwer: ~1l unknown _2'2l lakdriwr/Hnrvon X21 ling. family poD• -231 MiP -31 mwt family Prop. X11 IignClaun _411rtcillary bq, X51 amutamant park .SI nobl/moth _291 mOnummt/mural/gravntone .~ 81 comrn. pl4 1 q at _271 folk art _ 71 tatttyn. Mp onr 7 tt _181 ftreet lumitun - 81 inAraiN py. _291 landaeaa arNia. - 91 aerie upliN bra _201 tnnNagltation -101 dwaa ~tl careen can tlNlp -111 InMnMnM ttruR X21 rurY Dan tpap -111 drie audltaium .bl farm/randl -131 emnN fw0h0e. nMl .311 miliury Drparly _1119oa1mrant e19. _281 CCCANPA structure -181 eduuaonN 019. _3b11Mnic minariN proartv -181 rNigiaw b9, amnic group 15201 _171 R/R d4pot -181 trun ~)1 nignwrv/tnd J91 bid9a _38) wtlmin's woam X01 ertN/a9taMuet X101 catnlbry 111 dam X91 otMr Buddarlt110.251: 15. ArMitgealral /IaM xnnrv vl cman ~ arM Sadflatipm; y1a X No 9, year of Survey (21: 199111992 O-R 8501Rrv. 12/821 000162 Pearson Filling Station and Garage Historic Resource Survey Form Continuation Sheet 1 7b. shingles of a reddish-brown color. A skylight with six panes of glans has also been added to the middle of the hip roof on Che north elevation. Poured concrete stripe extending the width of the oor ~orh along the ground serves an banes for eaoh set of the supporting columns. At one time the north and south bays eacA had two gasoline pampa while the middle bay had one pumpr all the pampa have been removed. The st zucture'a walls are currently painted white with setl paint applied under the eaves; there is initial evidence that the walla were once painted zed, mustard, antl blue. The lanes[ rat ion pattern oL the structure is as follovs: North Elevation: The door, approximately 6 1/2 feet high, has been removed and the opening has been boarded up. There are two 20-paned windows aide-by-aide to the east of the door on the north elevation. A metal grate has been added to the windors. The six panda in the center of the windows open outward. South Elevation: The front door is under the Porte cochere. It is a single door with a single-pane rindor. Above the tloor is a single-paned window and there are aingle-paned, wood-framed vindora to the left and right of the doors. The window to the left is boarded over with metal gsatea. The six panes in the center of the rindowa open outward. East Elevation: There sra two windows, spaced approximately 10 feet apart, that have 20 panes. Both windows axe covered with metal grates. The six panes in the center of the windows open outrard. West Elevation; There is a 20-paned window on the south aide covered aith a metal grate. The six panes in the center of the rindor open outrard• As mentioned, there is a derv ice Day entrance on the we at elevation and a la zger se rice bay on the south elevation. The sa rvice bay doors on the south elevation are constructed of 2 1/2- inch vertical aiding with 5 1/T-inch boards spaced 9 1/2 feet apart. There are three decorative hinges on the top o[ each of the sliding doors and the 5 1/2-inch boards are cut to a point on the base board. The sliding doors are on a track mechanism that is still in place. Two 18-loth wide concrete buttresses flank the ae rv ice bey doors, and one gooseneck light remains above the tight ae rvice Dey door and another to the right of the service bay doors. The small service Dey on the west elevation nas double wootled doors arA is cone[ rutted of 2 1/2-inch vertical siding on ~~!f?1~3 Pearson Filling Station and Garage Historic Resource Survey Fotrl Continuation Sheet, 2 7b. continued the top and 6-into horizontal aiding on [he bottom. Detailing similar to [hat on the south aide door exists on thin went aide. 19, The station also nerved for many decades as a gathering place for local residents. Grove owners would come Co the station in the winter months and together would wait and wonder if temperatures would drop below freezing. rhile Chey waited they would gather around the radio for entertainment until the dropping me rtury alerted them that their citrus groves were in danger. Residents of Et iwanda had Only three places to purchases [heir gasoline and of them, Pearaon'a was the moat modern and full-sezvi red establishment. Highway Patrol offices assigned to the local stretch of Route 66 also congregated at the service station. During Che 1930s and 1990a, offices Frank Freeman and "Two-Gun^ Louis Kronmeyer spent many hours with their friend Doc Pea zson. M episode retold by Mz. James Clark is pa cticula Ay revealing of tae role tae ae rvi<e station played in decades gone by; namely, of the races that would be held along Route 66, Foot hill Boulevard, from the border of Upland to Doc Pearson'a garage. Tae tro office ra rould station themselves at either end to atop traffic on the two-lane road and allow the motorcycle races to proceed. It appears that Che station changed hands numerous time after Mr. Pearson sold it in approximo rely 1995 end the Meye ra family as aumed owne cahip in 1951. Harvey Beach of Riverside and Donald Howell of Fontana appear as proprietors Sn Che 1995-96 telephone directory voile eilliam Lamb of Cep Baldy is thus listed in 1946- 49. The building appears to meat the trite zia of eligibility fcr inclua ion in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C. Along the regional stretch of Foo[h::: Boulevard, the roadside vernacular Cant characterized Che phya:ca. landscape of the original Route 66 is rapidly being replaced. 'te Peazaon Filling Station and Garage remains, however, as a testament Co this important stylistic and cultural period A.ie rican histc ry. The station and garage represent a basics::~ intact example of a modest, roadside, and vernacular express ion .. Che very popular Spanish Revival architectural sty le roost curt!: by the foremost local contractor of the day, Nenry Kluamon. A• such, it is the only example of its building type to have reta:nl: as much of its original appearance and one of a handful of rapid.. disappee ring Kluaman structures. QOQ1fi4 September 16, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM •`;r . a' ~: T0: 8rad Buller, City Planner FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT; SERVICE STATION CANOPY - N.E. RNER ETIWANDA AVE. & FOOTHILL BLVD. This will review the results of a structural investigation conducted on September 10, 1992 to determine the feasibility of relocating the above referenced structure. After removal of the exterior plaster in a number of critical locations and observations of the internal framework, I have reached the following conclusions. a) Nearly every connection and structural member would require replacement or reinforcement because of dry rot, obsolescence, or inadequate strength or stiffness. b) The structure is very unorthodox in construction compared to today's methods, using unconventional methods of assembly i.e, use of lag-screws for connections, splices at mid-span of members, use of corrugated cardboard as backing for stucco, etc. c) The exterior plaster, particularly to the ceiling plane is literally becoming detached from it's supports and will likely fall off if the canopy is moved. It also poses a degree of hazard to anyone beneath it, since traffic vibration could ultimately dislodge it. d) The roof is straight sheathed and will require replacement of the roof decking in order to attain lateral stability required under the codes today. e) The columns supporting the roof system are not properly braced to resist wind and earthquake forces. f) The roof covering will require replacement to provide proper weather protection. g) The exterior stucco does not have a weather resistant barrier between 1t and the supporting framing, which would be required if moved to a new location. [n light of the above conditions, it is ab' opinion that attempts to relocate the structure might very well result in it falling apart in the process; certainly, reconstruction would be much more feasible. Xh~~~-~1Gt, 000165 MEMO: SERVICE STATION CANOPY - N.E. CORNER ETINANDA AYE. 8 FO'~TH ILL BLVD. September 16, 1992 Page 2 Considering the potential for someone to be indured in the event of dislodgement of the ceiling stucco, and the lack of barriers to prevent pedestrian or vehicular traffic underneath the structure, the current conditions of the structure constitutes a public nuisance and should be abated by fencing around the canopy, pending permanent solution to it's existence. I trust this provides the information you required. JG:71 000166 DEC-30-1992 16:44 FRU9 STRPLES-TR2RRrKE 1790 TO 198998'6499 P•02 AN ASSESSMENT OE NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGffitLITY" FOR TfIE P]sARSON FILLING STATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI.ffORN1A ('StEPARED FOR: BARRY VANTIG11t PREPARED BY: LOUIS SKTs~TON, ARCffi7'ECT 15 DGCEMBER, 1992 ~041~7 ~+it3tT "g'1 DEC-30-1992 1c~45 F~ STHPLES-TOP,RFY~Y..E p50 TO 19095876499 P.0? 1.4 INTRODUCTION 1.t STATEMENT OF PURPOSE THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY IS TO ASSESS THE NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY OF THE PEARSON FILLING STATKNJ IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA . PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT, SECTION 106. THE "SECTION 106" PROCESS APPLIES TO ANY E'ROPCRTY LISTED IN, OR ELIGIBLE FOR, THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES. THE PROCESS iS INTENDED TO IDENTIFY ALL ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES AND UE I EKMINE THE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON THEM. fF THERE IS AN ADVERSE EFFECT, THEN WAYS TO AVOID OR REDUCE IT ARE TO BE SOUGHT. UNDER SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT. A PROPERTY CAN BE CONSIDERED POTENT WLLY ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IF IT MEETS ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA (ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1984 ): A ASSOCIATION WITH EVENTS THAT HAVE MADE A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE BROAD PATTERNS OF HISTORY. B. ASSOCIATION WITH THE LNES OF PERSONS SIGNIFICANT IN OUR PAST C. EMBODIES THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION, ORTHAT REPRESENTS THE WORK OF A MASTER, OR THAT POSSESS HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES, OR THAT REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT DISTINGUISHABLE ENTITY WHOSE COMPONENTS MAY LACK INDIVIDUAL DISTINCTION. D. HAS YIELDED OR MAY LILLY YIELD INFORMATION IMPORTANT IN PREHISTORY OR HISTORY. TO BE CONSIDERED ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER, NISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES MUST BE AT LEAST 50 YEARS OLD. THESE THEN ARE THE CRITERIA TO BE USED TO EVALUATE THE NATIUNAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY FOR THE PEARSON FILLING STATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 000168 LE[-32-1932 16: a5 FROM STFpIES-TOFRFMICE #?Q iCi -9995c~~649? F. Ba 1.2 t]UAUFlCATtON3 -LOUIS SKELTt]N, HtSTORfC ARCHfTECT Louis Skelton Is A Licensed Arcttdect In Private Practice In Long Beach, Ca. Fie is Certif'red ey The National Council OFArchitectural Boards And Holds Registration In Five States, Indud'mg Calfornia. Mr. Skelton Has Extensive Expererr_ (20 Yeas) in Evaluafing, Rehabilitating And Restoring Historic Ploperfies. His Projects Have included The Documemation And Successful Listing OF Over One Hundred National Register Properties In Five States And The Preoaretion OF Two Successful National Re~rster Districts ComprisMg Nearly Four Hundred Contributing Structures. His Rojects Have Been FZecogn¢ed With ~;~~ ~ Awards For Adaptlve Reuse And Sensitive Additbns To Historic PrcPertiea. Ha Has a,,nzrd5 Relocated And Restored Twenty-Seven Historic Properties7nduding AGreene And Greene Residence. He Hae Bean Lfsted In Who's Who In Califomia As An Historic Ardlltect Since tt;'88. Mr. Skelton Ea Curtently Serving As The Senor Member (N The Cukurel Fbritage Commission For The City OF long Basch (Mayoral Appointce) And Is A Pan Chak. He Is Also The V'~Chair OF The Los Angeles Courrty Hfstoric Landmarks And Records Commission.( Appointed 8y Board OF Supervisors) Mr. Skelton Served For Two Veers On The Architecural Review Board For Columbus, Ga (Mayoret Appointee) Louis Skelton is A Beoo9nized And Published Au4horlty On Architectural Hlettxy And Styles. He Has Presented Lectures And Tours To Sdrooi And University Classes, Community Groups, And Nos Served As A Guest Panelist For Several Local, State, And National Conferences On Topkis Ranging From The Technical Aspects Of Restoration To Beetling BuAdirgs And Conducting Historical Raaaarch. Ha Swwc As An Advisor To California State University-Long Beach, Department OF Rerxeetion And leisure Studies, With An Emphasis On Managing Pubfic Owned Historic Properties. OOfi169 DEC-30-1992 1646 FROM 9Ti~LE6-70RRPNCE p90 TO 19099E'76499 P.05 2.~ 2.1 SOURCES CONSUU'EQ The Materpls Used For Research Of This Project include The Verdcai Files And Local History Section OF The Public Library In Ordario, l:a., The City Directories Of Cvaamonga, Including F.6warnfa Publications And Artitdes In Historic Preeervadon Magazine, Travel And leisure Magazine. The National Parr Magazine, Peterson's Phoxgraphic Magazine, ' A Wpa Guide To Califpmia " , "Route 66 ,The Mother Road "Light Over The Mountain, A History OF The Rancho Cttx.~ammortga Area," The Staff Report Prepared By Anthea ~~ t lartig For The City Of Rancho Cucemorga, And Oral Interviews With Tam Snyder, f_1N ~ Author ' A Route B6 Travebfs Guide: A Roadside Canpenion' And Vivian Devise Of v ~u T he t:alilomia Historie Rout~G Ass~tbn In La Verne And, Eupene Itogewa, SHPO. ~U ~lt/1.VN.~A .~SSQhL-e'+3 Q~~OZ"y~ ^..Er-30-1992 :c~n6 FFOM STRP~ES-TORF"N;rE u90 TO 190998?6n99 F.06 S-0 HISTORY 3.1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA AND ARF1+ Cucamonga. Allaged~y The "Land Of Many Springs" fn A Native Indian Language Was Inhabited By Native American Trifles Until The De Area Expedition Brought White Settlers In The 1700'S And The San Gabriel Missicn. In 1839, Tiburcio Tapia Was Granted This Area As A Rancho ey The Mexican Gcvernment. He Began The Planting Ot Grapes For Wine Protluction. In 1870. Isaias HeAman Purchased The Cucamonga Rancho. He tester Comt'~ted His Iowa Tract With The Hermosa Tract Deveoped By Adoplh Petsch To Fann The loamosa Colony, Which Was Changed To Alta Loma In 1813. In 1881 Joseph Garcia Sold His Huld'mgs To The Ghatrey Brcthers And They Developed The Etawanda Coony. The CFinate Anc1 Sal Cond'Rwns Contributed To A Thriving CIQus Industry Which Was Helped By The Arrival Of The Santa Fe Railroad In 1887. AgriruNure BuiR The Economy Of The Area And Was The Primary Commerce When The Red Car Line Was Instituted In 1914. The Vineyards And Wineries Continued To Expand As Did Land Transportation Wrth The Designation OF Route fifi As A Part Of The Nattorral Highway Program In 1826.. The Advent Of The AutomobNe And The Later Ilrterstate Roads Began The Decline Of Agricukure As The Smog Began To Undermine The Crops And The Demand For Housing Created Rapid Use Of The Vineyards Land For Suburbia And The Wineries Became Retail Shopping Centers To Serve The Changing Population. 3.2 ROUTE 138 - MAiN STREET OF AMERICA " Route 6S ,Starting At Grant Park In Chicago, Reached Aoraos More Then 2,400 Mlles, Three Time Zones, And Eight States -Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico~lrizona, California - Before k Deadended At The Santa Monica Boulevard And Ocean Avenue In Santa Monica.... I; Was Onc Of The Country's First Continuous Spans of Paved Highway Linking East And West"(1) The Development Of The Motorcar Created An Interest In Building Better Ro,~sds. Cangreas Passed The Federal Artl Road Act Of 1918 To Make Funds Available For New Highways. In 1921 The Law Was Modified To Construct A System Of Inierconttected Interstate Highways. Also In 1921, Cyrus Avery, A Reakar And Oil Developer In Oklahoma, Wac EWctad Prccidam Of The Associated Highways Association, Which Comprised Forty-Tyro Members From Across The Country. Avery Was Appointed State Highway Commissbner Of Oklahoma In 1923 And A Leader Of The American Aawciatlon Of State Higtlway Ofikials. k Was At The Associations 1924 Annual Meeting That A Formal Request Was Made To The U.S. Secretary Of Agiricutture That A t:ompreherwiw And Uniform Scheme Ba EMablishad For Roads Of Interstate And National Signlflcance. The Secretary Appointed Avery Ae A Consulting Ot~£3171 Pcr-30-1?92 1647 FR7M STRPLES-TOP.PRNCE p90 TC _9099776499 P,a7 Highway Specialist With The Charge That He Create What Would Se Knnwn As The United States Hghway System. Beginning In 1925, Avery Began Tu Establish The Proposed Network Of Routes. To Avoid CoMUSion, The East- West Routes Would ee Given Even NumberE And The North- South Routes Would Be Labeled Wdh Odd Numbers. In 1928 After Much Debate With The State OF Virginia As To The Use Of The Number 60, The Number 66 Was Chosen For The East• West Route From Chicago To The Pacific Ocean. The Route Became Ofricial On November 11, 1926 8y A Vvte Of Federal A~ ~d State Highway Officials. At The Time Of Approval Only About 800 Miles Was Paved. The Remaining 1,648 MAes Of Dirt, Gravel, Bricks And Other Surfaces Was Not Connected With Pavement Until 1937. ~ Avery Named The Route 66 As " Tha Main Street Of America' to A 9rxech At Tire Organizational Meeting OIThe National U.S. 66 Highway Association. It Was This Group That Sponsored The Famous "Bunion Derby" Which Was A Foot Race From lAs Angeles To 1Vew Yark With A Cash Prize Of $25,000 For The Winner. After 87 Days Of Running Abng Route 88 And'fhen East To New York, 55 Runners Completed The Marathon Run. This Evert Eatabfistrod the Image Of Route 66 And Mede It A Household Word In America. In The Fogowing Years, The Road Was Immortal¢sd In The Writings Of John Steint~edt And The ballads Ot Woody Guthrie. The Road Was Becoming The Symbol Ot The Independence And Migretion To The Promised Land Of CaNtomia. In 1948, A Sang Recorded By Nat "King" Cole Enticed America To "Get Your Kcks On Route 66." In The tie's The Route Wee Ogigneted As The Will Rogers Highway, in Memory Of The American Humorist. h Was The Federal Highway Act OF 1956 That Established Guidepnea For The Irlterstsrta Highway System That Began Replacing The Original Route 88 With The New lnterstates 55, 44, 40, 15, And 10. Even The Televiabn Show Of The 80'S Was A Nostalgic Trip Abng A Read That Was Becoming Obsolete As Amerk~ beaarrte Less Interested In The Passage Aral More Intent On The Arrival To The Destirretion. The Last Lmk Of The "New` Interstate Systen Was Oedk~ted in 1984, However ,The Legend Of The "Mother Road" Remains In The Short Stretches Of Original Roads Abng The Ofrramps Of America's Super Highways. 3.S HENRYiaUSMAN,CONTRACTOR Henry busman Was A Contractor Woridng In The Area During The Earty PaR Ot This ~ Century. Hie Werk In YaR To Ba Inventoried, Hovrawr, He to AtVibuted With His Own ~~ Residence On Foothill Boulevmd, The Virginia Dare Winery, Portions O1 The Sycamore Inn And Several Concrete Water Tanks And Related Buildings On The Wineries. tie Is ~U~ ~ Also Seen Named As The CArtVactar For The Pearson Filling Station. He Is Known To ' Have Worked In Cesi-In-Place Concrete, Whk:h Was A Common Materiel And Method ~L`' Of This Time Period His Rtrvr-times Are (~aneralty Innuencad By The Spanish Cobnial ..~ Revival Style. ~... i COC1.72 JEC-:R-.?52 ii:: ae RRQ"i STAPLES-TOP.RR^!~E q~ iG 19E99°^F455 P.Oe 4. ARCHITECTURAL ASSESSMENT 4.1 317E The Site Is Approximately Two Acres i 200'X430') Located At The North East Corner Of Foothill Boulevard And Etawanda Avenue. The Site Is Gerteralty Level With A Gentle Rise To The North. tt Is Mostly Opan WRh A Few Mature Trees. The Original Two lane Raad Of RoW.e $a Hes Been Widened To A five Lanc Road Wrth A Center Left Turn Lane. @awanda Is A Two Lane AsphaR Road Leading To The Etawanda Colony Site Approximatery One Mile To The North. interstate-151s Located Approximatety One-HaIF Mfb 7c The West And North. On The South West Comer OFThe Ske la A One Story Vacant Filling Station Historicairy Known As The Pearson Filing Station, And Canmonly Known As Duane's Servhx Station, The North West Comer OFThe Irrtersection Is The Sita Of A Former Roadside Motel (Demolished Due To A Fire) The Southeast Corner le VaoeM And The South West Comer Is Being Developed For A Wal-Mart Stropping Center And A Price Club Warehouse Retail Facikty. There Are Other Commercial Structures Along The North Sde Of FoothNl Boulevard And A Catholic Church Of Note To The West Of This 5ka. Most Of The Vineyards And Orchards Are Naw eafng Redevebped For Residential Or Cormercial Uses. 4.2 Billt.~NG The Mein Building Fonn Is A Rectangle Constructed Of Cast-In-Place Concrete Walls Wrth A Wood Frame Roof Structure. The Perimeter Is A Truncated Hip Roof Covered Wfth Terra Cotta Barrel Tr'les On The Front And Sides And Aspheit Compos8ion Shingles Akmg The Rear. The Flat Roof Is Covered Wdt F1ot Mopped, BWR Up CornpocRion Roofing .The Floor Is A Slab On Grade. The Buikting Is Divided Into The Service Bays For Auto Repair And A Small OPflce In The Southwest Corner. The Main Service Bay Entrance Is A Single Wide Opening With Three Overhead Track Doors On The South Elevation. A Single Wide Opening la Located On Tha WeBt Elevation Whh Double Doors. The Office Has A Single Door Leading To A Porte Cochere. The Porte Cochare Is OF Wppd Frame Construction Clad to Stucco And is Supported By Six Square Columns Forming Three Bays. The Root Is Lower Than The Main Structure, Ard to Covered YVhh Terra Cotta Tile Rooting To Match The Main Bulkling. N;~o~=#tfe Po~~ Corhere Appears To 8e A Later Adtlklon. It Has Been Damaged By Impact ~ And The Gas Pumps Have~e'enlier~ioved. ffa~sed Conaete islands Define The Keys C~QE41i3 I7EC-3O-1?92 1645 FROM SrRP:.ES-TOFtRnME p?p rO 1309987EA99 P.29 For Service. The Front eay, Originally Severn! Feet From Tne Edge OI Pavement. Is Now Only Severn! Indres From The Widened Route 66. The Foundation Of Separate Resdoom FaGlRtes (Now Dentol!Shed) Can lie Seen At The South East Comer Of The Main Structure. The Original Steel Framed Windows Ara Covered With Metal Grates And Are Being Vadalized. A Later SFry(igM Has Been Added To The North Roof Elevattin. 4.3 INTERIOR The Interior OF The Building Is Exposed Conrxete Fbw And Wags And Exposed Wood Frame Trusses. The Auto Service C-quptlment liar Been Removed And The Area la Being Used For Unconditioned Storage. 4.4 MITE6RiTY The Main 9tructuts Appears To Be EsaeM•1a11Y In Tact With The Ewoeption Of The Added Skylight And Asphalt Shhgbs.. The Porte Cochera Has Sustained Severe Impact And Water Damaga And Needs Sulletantiel Repair. The Gas Pumps And Auto Service EquiprtteM Haw Been Removed And The Reatrooms Have Been Demofiahed. Ths Rsladortsitip Of The Building To The Rued Is No Longer Valid. The Rural Two Lane Road la Now A Five L.EMre Road Wlth A McJor Intareadion Evolving Into A large Scale Commercial Envkonment The Underling Zoning Is For Planned Commercial Development Artd Ttrreelerls To Erode All Evidence Of The H'stortcal Context Of The SeMCe Stettin. 0001'74 PEC-3C~-199.' SE~49 FP.CM 9TgPLEE-7~RRfp1CE p99 TO 1~f29997ta99 ?.:~' 5.0 EVAWATION OF NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY 5.7 SUMMARY it 1s Dpinirm Of This AuthorThat'I'he Ori¢inal Cottext OfT7te Station To The Historic Rwte 66 Aa A Rtaal Two Lane Highway ,Has Been Sabstazltially Altered Thmngh The Yeats Hy Widening And Other "Improvements". The Ociginil Equipment And Restrooats Have Been Removed And The Porte Cosh„-re 3 'P`~,-~O.^. ;~~ Add,- Tne Adjoining Agricultttrel Uses Hare Disappeared And The Original Context OFThe Stmctme No Longer Exist 5.2 THE FIRST CRITERION TO Bfi CONSIDERED IS THE BUILDLYGS ASSOCIATION RTTH EVEN; S THAT HAVE MADE A SIGNIFICAAT CONTRH3U7ION TO BROAD PATTERNS OF HISTORY .The Discrssion Of Route 66 Will Dlusaste This Criterion. The Importance Of Route 66Is Dooumertod As "Thc Mather Road" It Is Reeognded As The Beginning Of The [nteratate Highway System Iv The United States. The Service Station In Question Was Not A Crmtnbuling Facurt Te This Relationship And Therefore Would Nave To Have Other Events Forthcoming To Qualify User This Cnterion. S 3 THE SECOND CRITERION IS THE BUII.DINGS ASSOCIATION WITH THE LIVES OF PERSONS SIGNIFICANT IN OUR PAST. Initial Research Indicates That The Owncrs And Opcretors Of This Srnicc SwHon Wero Known Daly To Theeir Imtttediate Ghatomers And Were Not involved In Significant Contnbutians To The Commtmity And Thcrcfore World Alot Exhibit The Level Of Significance Intended By This Criterion. S 4 THE THIRD CRITERION I$ WHETHER THE STRUCTURE SMHODIES THE DISTTNCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TYPE, PERIOD; UR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION, OR THAT REPRESENTS A MASTER OR THAT POSSESSES HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES OR THAT REPRESENT A Sl(iNIFICANT DISTINGUISHABLE ENTITY WHOSE COMPONEIv'I'S LACK LNDMDUAL D[STiNCTTON. Although Thia Is Complex 1t'ording, The Estxnce Is Clear. Dow This Building Represent A Unigae Or Distinctive Type Oi' Sttactare in One Fprm Or Another' This Stiu~Ktac I: A Cast In Place Concrete Which Wan A Very Cottmwn Construction Method In The Twenties. The Style is Bayed RottQhly On Spanish Coltmial Revival Which le Common To The Area And Region And This Example Offers No SiguifitaQtt Vatiadtm. Tate Contractor'Designer Appears?o Have Gained Local Notioe For His Works, However, I Believe Other 9trucurres World More Reprctxnt Isis Maaterworka. (Eg. The Syoamo» Itm And The Virginia Dore Winery J 0Q(Dl"J5 GEC-30-1?92 1650 FROM S7iiPLES-7ppyfiNCE p90 TO 19099876499 P. 11 5.4 7HE FINAL CRifERiON IS THAT 7HE STRUCTURE HAS S7ELDED OR M.4Y LIKELY YIELD INFORMATION IIvIPORTANT IN PREHiSTORX OR HISTORY Thete Is No EviQtawe That This Sitc Huhb Infurmstivo Retstal Tu PreLiswry Aud lu Putcrriial Is Not Signi6cantiy More Than Atry Other Site In The Area Ita Potential To Relay Any Valuable Infotmatian To History Wonld Not Appear To Add To The Body Of Knowledge Tn A SignifipM way. TI IS THIS AUTHOR'S OPllVION TEAT THIS STRUCTURE DOES NOT QUALIFY IN ANY OF THE FOLK CRITERIA ESTABLISHED TO DETERMINE BLLGll31Ll'I'Y h'OK THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HIS'R)RIC PLACES. I DO BELIEVE THE STRUCTURE COULD QUALIFY AS A CONTRIBUTING ST'RUCTURfi TO AN HISTORIC DISTRICT, HOWEVER, THE CONTENT FOR THIS OPPORTUNTIY SEEMS TO BE WEAK SINCE THERE IS NOT A CONTIGUOUS BOUNDARY OR A DEFINABLE GEOGRAPHIC AREA. 1.~Ii1aC0l-ATi01Y 11 IS RECOhL+vffiNDED THAT TH8 9TRUCTURE Bfi PHOTO DCICUML•NTED AND A MEASURED DRAWING BE PREPARBD OF THE FORTE COCHE13E STRUCTURE. COPIES OF THESE RfiCORi?S SHOULD HE FILfiD WITH THE CALIFORNIA HISTORIC ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATION AND THE LOCAL HISTORY SECTION OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR FUTURE REFERENCE ANR STUDY. ~Q~1~ DEC-x--1392 16$1 FROn STRPLES-TORR6NCE N90 TO 190998'76499 P. 12 8.0 REFERENCES Baldwin. l~nlel 1999 Route 66:Shooting the Main Street.,.Peterson's PhotQgraohic Maa 11/90 p.47 BoyO,ROber! 1992 Route e6: Unmarked Buf Not Uneurtg. The New York Times 8/23192:Sec 5 P~ocB Davies, Vivian 1992 Oral Interview (714593-4046) Director, California Historic Route 68 Assodation HartiB,Anthea 1992 Oral Interview - CkY of Rancho C:uaemon8a, Planning Dept. Henderson.Jim 1992 Get Your Kicka.tl7riving Route 66) Travel and Leisure Apri192 pW 10(5) Snyder,Tom 1992 Oral Interview ((BOS48fr9923) Ruthw,R4tlRe 6B: A Trevebr'a Guide 3tewarl Dan 1981 Route66: terminal ~rt not quite d9ed yef ~,ques 8 Collecting Hobbies Jan 91 p58(4) Wallis, Michael 1990 Rvuffi 68:Trie Matter Roaa.gi Mamrt's Praea, New York, N.Y. Q~~1.'7~ FESOLVTION N0. (~~~ A RESOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02, THEAEEY DESIGNATING PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE, LOCATED AT 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-02. WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Landmark Designation 92-D2, ae described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation is referred to as the "application". WHEREAS, On Assgust 25, 1992, the Historic Preservation Caaani scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92-O d, thereby recommending to this City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on October 7, continued to December 16, 1992, and again continued to January 20, 1993, the Ciiy Council of the City of Poncho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Lhe application and concluded said hearing on that date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NUW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, detexmine, and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The application applies to property lots tad at Asaesaor Parcel Number 1100-161-02. SECTION 2: Repro sent.t n9 bath the Etiwanda citrus community and the importance of Route 66 to Averican culture and folklore, the structure harkens back to en era of egz icultural growth and macs western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical rervicee, and often a helping hand, the eiation and its wmers were an important part of the local area. The proposed landmark mee to the following criteria established in chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical. and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed Landmark ie particularly zepresentatlve of a historical period, type, style, re gian, or any of life. 2. The proposed landmark ie an example of a type of building which was once common but Se nee tare. Q,pp178 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PEARSON FILLING STATION January 20, 1993 Page 2 3. The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. Tne proposed landmark was co~ected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality. 5. The proposed landmark is connected wish a business or use which vas once coxm;an but Se now rare. 6. The architect or builder was important. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. i. The construction materials or engineering ae thods used in the proposed landmark are unusual oz significant or uniquely effective. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting; 1. The proposed landmark materially benefiia the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. Tne propOeed Landmark, in its location, represents an established end familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and City (ord. 70 69, 1979). SECTION 3: Designation of a Landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, section 15308). SECTION 4: Baeed on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Council and based on the findings eat forth above, HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Coun cll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the designation of the peareon Pilling Station and Garage ae a Historic Landmark. 0001;9 I /~o -/~~ ~Elx ur liAlvl4rlV uuunlnilrvtta STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 ?p: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Bu118 r, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRIXJMENT ASSESSMENT ANO CpNDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-18 - SMITN'S - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision 3enying the development of a eo®ercial shopping center consisting of a 75,000 square foot grocery store, two satellite buildings of 3,500 square £eet each, and a drive-thru pad of 4,800 square feet on 10.6 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Poothi ll Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-03, 5, H, 15, 20, 21, and 49. Associated with Chis project is Tree Removal Permit 92-17. The Planning Commission reconmiends that the City Council concur with the find inga made by [he Commission and adopt the attached Resolution of Denial. However, if after receiving input on the proposed project, the Council determines to uphold the appeal, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Approval to be brought back at your next meeting. B11CFfiIbBND Following the Planning Conmiseion's public hearing on December 9, 1992, the Planning Coamission denied the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit on December 15, 1992. At the December 9 and December 15, 1992 meetings, several concerns with the site plan, circulation, and project design were voiced by members of the Commission. A more detailed discussion of the Coamieeion's concerns can be reviewed in Lhe attached minutes from the December 9 and December 15, 1992 public hearings. The Co:moi ssi on's primary concerns can generally be summa tired as follows: Site Plan/Circulation The orientation of the loading dock doors, which are located on the east and west aides of the store and which face Foothill Boulevard, were a public circulation and aesthetic concern for the Commission. The internal circulation plan has potential Fot conf llcts between truck, automobile, and pedestrian traffic within the parking lot. 00018^ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 97.-'B - SMITH'S ,Ianua ry 20, 1993 Page 2 Ttuck traffic along San He rnardino Road and truck ingress/egress from and to this street is undesirable to existing residents on both sides of the street. Design The amount and location of the project's Forking within the activity center was not found to be consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Following adoption of the Resolution of Denial for the Conditional Vse Permit on December 15, 7992, the applicant filed a timely appeal to allow the City Council to consider the application as pYOpose d. AHAL73IS A. Site Plan/Circulation The Commission felt that the design of the grocery store building with the dock loading areas facing the Pzont of the center (Foothill Boulevard) was inconeisten[ with other shopping centers which have been approved and constructed within the City. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan cequirea that auto related facilities (i. e., working bays and storage areas) be screened or oriented away from public views. It was the Cammission'e opinion that the docks were not adequately screened with the trellis element the applicant was proposing and that any design That indicated docks in the Er oat of the store was unacceptable. The Commission Sndiceied that these service related arses are typically and more appropriately provided along the rear ale vationa of grocery stores and/or shopping centers to conceal dalive ry activity from public view, particularly Sn an arse which ie considered to be a major gateway into the western section of the City. The Commission felt there could be potential vehicular conf llcts between car and truck traffic due to the location of the easterly dock area in such close proximity to the entry from Vineyard Avenue. The mi tags ti one incorporated into the project's design were not found acceptable. The Commission also felt ouch a confueing traffic pattern on the site could 6e potentially dangerous to pedestrians as well. De sl gn The Commission also felt the parking lot would be a dominant feature along Foothill Boulevard which would be inconsistent oath the goals and design guidelines of the ac[lvity canter concept na out ll ned in the Foothill Boulevard Hpeclflc plan. At the public hearing on De camber 9, 1992, the Comma scion received four letters Eras adjacent property owners to the north of the OOOlE3 CITY COUNCIL STAPF R&PORT CUP 92-18 - SMITH'S January 20, 1993 Page 3 project site and on the south side of San He rna rdino Road. The letters have been attached for Council review; however, the owners were generally concerned that their parcels would be difficult to develop if they were not included with the Smith's Food and Dzug proposal. They also felt as though a more aesthetically pleasing project could be developed if the entire block were developed as a whole. Additionally, a resident at the north aide of San He rnardino Road objected to large truck traffic on his street. OPfI0.VS The City Council may consider three possible options regarding the proposed project: Uphold the findings of the Planning Commission and deny the project without prejudice. 2. Direct the applicant io work wSth staff and the Planning Conaniasion to redesign the site plan in order to address the concerns of adjacent property owns re, residents, and the Covvnission. 3• Uphold the appeal and approve Conditional Vas Pe roll 92-18 ae currently proposed. This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Hul le tin newapape r, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within Subarea 2 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Aee lly s to d, ~' er 1 r Ci pianos eE:BN:mlg Attachments: Exh161t "A" - I.e tter of Appeal Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report Doted December 9, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Resolution of Denial 92-151 Exhibit "D" - Mlnutee from December 9, 1992 Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit "E" - Minutes from December 15, 1992 Planning Cammiaeion Meeting Exhibit "F" - to rte re from Adjacent Property Dane re Resolution of Denial Q~G154 BEST, BEST b KRIEQER uMntR{ nIV[gCIOE ROp NORTN Nwvin. \UIT[ I]o (]twI p96.1.]O RO[T MiICE WA 9]RO ONTARIO, C,11I10RNIR b){I IwLM \I.RINOf 1619) ]ES-])!w T[IEIMONC f]I.) 9N~{\\w TCIELLIRR pal 9w41u1 December Z3, 1992 Debra Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 MNCNO MIRMF f[t01 ]{{~]{tl flECE1VE0 ..t n OF RMIDHpE UCgyONGP DEC 2 31992 789]01112 i21 ^056 qm -5ic~lx_~ Ra: Appeal of Denial of Planning Commission'^ Denial of Conditional Use Permit 92-18 - Smith's ,ICIUat7 Dear Ma. Adams: Wa have bean asked by our client, Smith's Pood and Drug Cei,tera, Inc., to Tile vitti you, pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of thE: Development Coda of the City of Reecho Cucamonga, an appeal of the Planning Commiaeion'a decieiar. •Ir DaC~.\+er 15, 1992 to deny Smith'6 application far a ~oixlitionsl use permit. Smith's asks that the City Council approve the conditional uaa permit and the related mitigated Negative Declaration. A chock ir, the emount of $126.00 is attached, ae required by the City's fee schedule. The basis for the appeal is Smith's belief that the project as approved by the Daeign Review Commission and presented to the Planning Commission is consistent with the land use development standards o! the City end that the findings for the issuance of a conditional use permit can and should be made in this case. Atter reviewing the record and attending the hearing, we believe that the lindings of tact and conclusions of law in the resolution of denial adopted by the ?leaning Co®ission era not supported by signilicant evidence in light of the whole record. We request that this matter be set for hearing at the City s earliest convenience. va'ry` truly yoCUrs, a~ Wynne 3. Furth of Bast, Best 11 xrieger WSF/jr QQ~'1$5 ~X`I~1~~ ~Ih~l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 1992 T0: Chairman end Members of the Planning Comniseion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 6I: Beverly Niaaen, Aeaociata Planner SUBJECT SMITM~9 - The development of a commercial •hopplnq enter coneiating of • 75,000 square Eoot grocery stole, two a'.tal'.ce bu Sidings of 3,500 square foot each, and a d__.. chru pad of 4,800 square CNC on 10.6 ecru of land in the Co:munity Conercial District (Subarea 2) of CN Poothlll Bouluvatd Spec!fle Plan, located nt the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard antl Vineyaztl Avenue - APN: 207-302-03, 5, 0, 35, 20, 21, antl 49. Aaaoc ietetl with thin project la Tree Removal Permit 92 -17. PROJECT ANO SIT, DESCRIPTION: A. Action Rewested by A licani• Approval of a Conditional Vu Permit [or eM development of a 75,000 square foot grocery store and conceptual •ib plan approval of two utelllte bu ilding• of 3,500 square feet each (Fade B and C) and conceptual approval o[ a 4,800 equate foot pad (Patl A) for drive-chru purposes and issuance of a nit igated Negative Declaration. e. Surround ino Land Use and 2 ni North - Vacant and exLtinq apartment builtlingsi Community Comeere lal (SUbares 2, Foothill sou lavard Specific Plen). South - Vacanii CpwaunLty Commercial (Subarea 2, Poothlll Boulevard Spec lEic Plan). East - Thomas Vinery Pieta; Specialty Commercial (SUbaren 2, Poothlll Boulevard Specific Plan). Neat - Cucamonga Creek Channel] Flood Control. C. General Plan Deei at' Project site - commercial North - Comae[c lal South - Commercial East - Commercial Neat - Flood Control ~Q186 ~l'~~y~'r 1~p711 V ~ PLANNING COMMISSIO. ,TAFF REPONT CUP 92-18 - SNITH'S December 9, 1992 Page 2 D. SiU Charectsrl ti The project site ie approximately 10.fi acres in sire end elopes approximately 4 percent trom north to south. Tha siG is made up of several parcels, all of which are currently awned by Smith's Pool and Drug- A house built by the Thomas famLly in 1910 et ill cite on the property. An exi st inq restaurant building ie located on the Bite as well as a vacant roller rink facility. Thus structure nre proposed for demolition with construct Lon of the project. 8. parkins Calculations: Number of Number of TYPe Square Parking Spaces Spaces o[ Uee Footage Ratio Required Provided Grocery Store 74,896 !/250 300 Ped A (drive-thrv) 0,800 1/75 66 Feat Pood Pad S 3,500 1/250 16 General Retail Pad C a, 500 1/250 1} General Retail TOTAL 392 675 ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant i• requesting to develop a 70,896 square foot supermatML and a fact food drive-thru pad of 4,800 square feel and two general retell psde of 3,500 square fut each. TM review rsqueeted [or tM three fnestandlnq psde la conceptual only and specific design review of the architsatural •lsvat ions end •iu plan details will be required in the future wMn they ors proposed for development. The proposed •ib plan also includes dwelopa~ent of the Activity Center concept at the corner, including • waGr elsmenL and special paving conaLUnt with the Foothill Boulevard 9psciEie Plan, and pedeetrLn connection to the tutors Regional Multi-PUrpow Tull locat.W along Cucamonga Crnk Channel which borders tM site to the we eC. TM project aLo provides a vehicular wnnection to the vacant parcel to the north at the corner of son Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulward a part o[ • conceptual master plan. ~( $ ~~ (i 0~(llb7 PLaNNTNO COMM ISg IO, .SAFE REPORT CUP 93-18 - SNITH'g December 9, 1993 Page 3 H. Backetound: A Pre-Application RwieM roe condueUd on the project on April 2, 1993, by the full Planning Co®leeion. kt that meK inq, tM Commie ion identified the following lows and auggeated that tMy W addraeed in any tutors submittal: 1. TM chalUnge for tM applicant ix to fit the 75,000 square foot building onto tM •ib. 2. The cut-parcel to the north should M master planned. 3. Three of the Commissioners mote opposed io [oil-up doors [ae inq Foothill Boulevard and one o! tM commiaioners feli they might M sueeustully Lneorporaial into the project 1f aothetics and location issues mote conaideral. 6. Metal roof Ls not desirable. 5. The architecture of the project should not reties that o[ the Thames Nlnery shopping cater. 6. Englnarinq and Historic Preservation concerns wcm not dlcuual. The appl Scant should consult with the wire DL[riet to deurmine It tM secondary drlvaay off Vineyard Awnue could M turf blocked and whKher a majority of CM drive aisle Gould M reduced to 2L fat. TM xlaiotic Prasrvation Coaaaiulon will consider the project dose the orlglnel Neamonga Peat O[tiee wa loeatal on CM •lte. 7. TM applicant should revise the Activity Center concmpi. eul ldings of an approprlab sole should M added and sited aL tM corer. C. Da San Review Ce>•itta: TM Design Review Cos•ltta (Helchsr, Toltoy, ColeYn) reviewed tM project on October 6, 1993, and recammendal tM tollorinq revisions: 1. Thm applicant lndieatal ehae the rock wtsrlal utlllzal on the storm ra sLllr to ehae of the flayfarer•^ CMpel and Taliain Mest. TM Cemsltta felt thl• ra unacceptable, Mewa tM era wa notal !or river rock ~Le., smooth, roundal eobbles~j howvn, tM Coeapltta wa will inq to review epeelt le dKaile, photograph, and mKerlal maniple of how tM matmrlal could rock and whether or not Se wou30 tit into the conuxt of tM •lu. Tudltlonal rivmr rock wa euggatal u an •lternatlve vhlch mould M eampatlblm with rivmr rock approval for tM norUaee and southaet eornmr o[ CM lntmrsmetlon !f the othmr typ. of stone i^ dKerminal not to M appreprlats. er~1s~ N $ .~ N PLANNING COMMISSIOI. ~TAPP REPORT CUP 97-18 - SNITH'S December 9, 1994 Paga 0 2. The ComiittN preNrred the second option Eor the drivrthru; howver, they requ Lred that the drive-thru lane be screened tram Foothill Boulevard. An it lustrat ive cross-section should be preNnted to the Committee for further r•vl•w. 3. A master plan which incorporates accNS to the parcels to Lhe north ehou ld W provided. d. Landeoapinq should b• provided in front of and atljac•nt to tM Smith's building. 5. No cart storage should W allowed In trout o! tha grocery store building. A letter frae Smith's agreeing to this condition should b• submitted prior to scheduling for Planning Comniuion. TM CommittN eugqutad acing tM trlanqular space betwNn CM store and the loading arN for care .[Drag.. 6. The maN of tM tower should W modil ied by 1ncsHSinq its height and width. '/. Ths size of the tre11L colusma on tM [root elevation should G carefully Kudied end possibly incrused in depth Lo W square in shape. In addlClon, the size of tM liellis msmbara ehculd be epeeif ied. 8. TM pedutrlan conneetian to the Eront of the store should line up at 90 degrNS with tM front en[rance, rather than angled as currently shown. 9. Special paving (aggregate tinieh or inter locking pavers) should W provided in front of the entire entcyway acrou the driveway. 10. Lsrge canopy ones (not Che Prunue uruifera) ahoulJ W provided for shading of eM parking loL. Additional tress should W added io tM parking lot and may W planted rdjacene !o the light standards, with Che height of eM Llq:d: being lover (L. e., maximum 15 tees) roan tM eventual canopy height OL the trN. 11. The retaining wall^ along Vineyard Avenue and Poothill Boulevard should be trubd with the same type of rock thae will W provided on the building front. 14. NAeaign Ua Smith's Ntryway to provide a Ncond pt of glue door rather than a foreW alt Darrler or sllminate tM dividing wall Decween [M entrance and exit to provide • moo invlelnq entrance. ,1 b,~(( ooczSs PLANNING COMNISSI O, +TAPF REPORT CUP 92-18 - SMITH'S December 9, 1992 Page 5 13. The Foothill Boulevard Activity Center/landscape concept ehould continua from Lha corner to the channel along Foothill Boulevard and from the corner to the northerly driveway along Vineyard Avenue. Terraced rock walls ehould be provided to minimize 2:1 elopes. 16. Th. veneer of the iwo builtlinga a[ the cornea of Poothill Boulevard antl Vineyard avenue ehould De constructed of the rock matarSal. 75. If the two building pads at the cornet era not davelopetl at the •ams time ss tM grocery atom, tMn the arrest scope ehould W developed up to the level of pad and the pads landscaped for erosion control. 16. Incroesed information on how [he feat-food pad will work should b• submitted, inc lading a stacking study. 17. The CaimlttN szpruaed concern that the "aqueduct" •lemsnt was wkward, and comDlned with the grade differential, would negatively aftect Smith'• view corridor. 1B. The bus atop •helbr ehould be redoigned to •liminaG the steeply pitched roof element. 19. Provide a andering of the truck loading arsa• to show how trucks would be actsened. Ths applicant euhmitied rwised plena and the committee (MeN1Q, Me1cMt, Coleman( rwiewed CM rsviud proposal on November 3, 1992, and indicated that some of their concerns could become Conditions of approval, while soma Suues needed to Da reviewed further by tM Committee. additionally, certain site planning aapset• regarding the corner Pads B end C were discussed and may be incorporated a conditions of approval at a conceptual level only. The spproval of the spec lfic srchitecture [or Pads A, B, and C was deferred to a later data. The CommitGS recommended the pLns W reviasd to addru^ Ue following items at their November 17, 1992, meat ingi 1. Tha poured Ln-place rock treatmmnt proposed was not acceptable to tM Committee. additional alurnativu, such as native river rack should W pruenGd for Committu nviaw and approval pr for to scheduling the pro}act for Planning Cammiuion. 2. The Might of the trellis in front of the Smlth'• store should 6e lowered to convey • human ^cale. The •izs of the wood nunnber^ of the trellis should be increaud. The architect OOL~13U u 3 „~,(, PLANNING CONMISSIO,. JTAFF REPORT CUP 92-13 - SMITH'S December 9, 1992 Pages 6 indicated that the size of the members were 4 Lnchss x 4 inches, 4 inches x 8 inches, antl 4 inches x 12 inehas. The Commitiea felt the smallest member size should be 6 inches x B inches with the other elements incraeeed prmportionately. The trellis should not just plainly terminate at the Duildinq face, but should somehow appear to ba ettucturnlly supported. TLle wLeh a rafter Lreaiment and pone iDle texture around the edge might be incorporatatl. 3. The eiza and shape of the trellis columns should W increased and/or madif isd. A battered •ida or a cruciform shape was sugqubd by the Coswittas. Also, the trallia at ruciurs should W pushed back towards Che more front with something morn subaiantial than vinN planted in front. 6. Tha pyramidal ahapad trellis •lemant over the Smith's entry door should be rev Lad and provlded with • solid file root element. 5. The roof of the bus shelur 1• still too atop and should G modified Lo ref lacl the shape o! Lhe lergar pyramidal element over the Smith's stare. The bus sMlter should have some type of solid overhead structure which will protect bus paoangara from the rain. 6. The overhead aqueduct element connecting Pad• B and C end the bus sMiter should 6a sllminaud. 7. The low walls ndjaunt to Peda B antl C should be tapered back et the ends rather than terminating abruptly. 8. Ths landauplnq/padotrlan walkway ato Deiwaen Pade a end C and the parking lot should be Lncwaaed to 30-12 toot in width minimwa. 9. Sawa landaoapinq at the corner of Vineyard Avenue and Pooth111 BouLvard L apprapriata7 however, a Lndicaud, !t Lntarrupb the flow of pedutrLn movement on Che •iu. The Corner should be doigned in an open manner and ehou id invite pedotrLans onto the LLu. TM rd Lcting pool and fountain era acceptable antl may Wen be acaLd down; however, the froeundtnq wall parallel to Foothill Boulevard bKwaan Che two eau of stairways ehcald ba des lead. 10. The acaL of CN stairway along Vineyard Avenue aAOUld be bolder, similar tc Chat which Le provlded along pooehlll Boulevard. 11. TM oLal pipe handnll^ an not dnlubl• and should be dsLUd nr redo Lgned. QOQ19~ h a~r~~ PIANNSNO COMMISSIOa .. TAFF REPORT CUP 92-18 - SMITH'S December 9, 1992 Page ] 12. The egress lane onto Focthill Bou levartl should be modified to extend the leng[h of the landa<ape plantar area •vsn with the end of the fist caw of parking. The Committee recommentletl Chai the following items be Included as conditions of approval Eor the project: 1. Tha bezminq along Foothill Boulevard adjacent to rho drive- thru lane ehou ld be s minimum of 3 feet in height in order to sdequately sorun ear^. 2. Special paving (aggregate finish or interlocking paves) should be provided in front of the entire entryway scros• the driveway. 3. The retaining walls along Vineyard avenue and Poothill Boulevard should W treated with the came type of rock Ghat will be provided on the bulldinq front. 4. The Foothill Boulevard act iviCy dnNr/landwape concept ahould coneinw tram rho corner to Chs channel along Poothill Boulevard snd from ens corner to tM northerly driveway along Vineyard Avenue. Terraced rock wells should G provided to minimize 2:1 elopes. 5. The veneer of the two bu ildings at the corner of Poothill Boulevard and Vineyard avenw ehou ld be conetrueted or aewnesd with the approved rock materiel Eor the Smith's storefront. 6. If the two bulldinq• at ens corner an not developed at the same time a the grocery store, then Che etrNtscape should be developed up to eM level of the pads and landeceped for erosion control. Thr applicant submleted revised plan^ which were reviewed 6y the Commlttw (MCNiel, Melchor, Coleman) at the niece Lng of Nove:nDez 17, 1992. The following items fray the previous moot ing of November 3, 1997, wars incorporaGd into the avLed project: No. 1, 7, J, {, 6, 7, 8, and 17. Ths Committee recommended aooroval suDi act io [he followinc. and s 1 • comments of tM Comm!ttee. beinc lncormrabd as Condit lone of aooroval: 1. A wild, flat bus shelter roof i• permin Ibis. Vitus may be incorporated adjacent to ohs supporting columns In order to •o [ten the sttucLUa (addruses prwtru• comment No. 5). 2. The concept of uL ll lzlnq palm tees within the activity CsnNr wu approvedr however, the applicant should work with sta[f in order to det•mine the most appropriate species during the plan check procu^ (addrsues prw LOOS comment No. 9). (~ ~ ~gpssz PLANNING COMMISSIOI. STAFF REPORT CDP 92-18 - SMI TR'S December 9, 1992 Page 8 3. The natal pipe ha ndraile are accaptaDle on a limited basis when needed adjacent to etairwaya. Color of the railings should bland in with the eutrou nd ing herdeoape and noG be treated with an obvious contrasting color (addreaaee previous conment No. 11~. 4. The pedestrian entrance to the fast food pad should bs treated with a textured paving similar io what i• proposed adjacent to the Smit h'• store entrance (acarad con<rats with a broom finish ~. 5. rood itione No. 1-6 frwo the previous Design Review committee meet ing will apply. 6. The green color of tM roof tile, window mullions, and tinted windows should G diaauued by the full Commission. D. T.chnical Rwiaw Ca®ittu: TM Technical Review Comslttaa reviewed Cns protect on Oc[obsr 7, 1992, and approved it subject to conditions contained witnin the Resolution of Approval. fiNyIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I o[ the Initial Study ^u Deen complebd by tM applicant. Staff hu computed Part Z of tM Environmsntel Checklist and found that the projset could have a significant effect an tna environment in several areas: A. Cultural Rswuzcse Studv: The •ite N• DNn identified a pert o[ a larger aru that rspreunts an important physical link to major historicsl periods Ln the Rancho Cucamonga arse and es such, there era many potentially significant impaci• as well a• a var ic[y of identified and unidentified cultural zsaourcea. The •Lt• was trsvened Dy local native Amsclcans prior to the arrival of the Spanish explorers. Tne •Lte wee en integral part of the Turbiclo Tapia Rancho de Cucamonga which inc ludsd the Thomas winery and was the location oC Chs first post o[Llce Ln the aru, which wu Commie iovd 6y Pru ident Lincoln in 1864. Fu rthst, the •ite still contains one of tAs few struetura built Dy CN Thomas family for family msmDSrs and workers. This •ing l• family structure U located at 8010 Vineyard Avenue. It was bu Llt Ln 1910 end L o[ a craftsman erchitsctural style. In addition, GM Tnomu Mouw, located at tM corner of Poothill eoulw-rd and San Bernardino Rosd, whlcn has been demolLMd, wu Dullt !n 1926. Tnerefore, a Cultural Rewures Study hoe been required, subject to Nletor is Pnservaeion Commluimn review end approval. The study hu Deen commie toned and • ranee pant has been ulectadr howwar, at the time at tole publle hurLnq, tM study has nos been compleGd. A Condition of Approval rsgsrdinq eha study nu Don pieced In eM Rssolut ion of Approval. 000193 u~,-~N PLANNING COMMIS5201, .TAFF REPORT COP 9Z-18 - SNITN'S December 9, 1992 Pages 9 e. Gaoloeic Review: TM •Lte Se located within the City'• designated Spacial Study Zone fez the inferred Red H111 Fault and as each, the provielons of the Alquint Priolo Act apply. The preliminary geotechnical investigation concluded LhaC the proposed retail stores could W euDject to •i9nificant groundsheking which could reeu It from earthquake. on any of eavaral nearby active fault •. However, based on the conaultant'• inventigat ion and data review, there is no evidmcs indicating that the Aad Hill Fault pruenb a eignif icant ground raptors harard to the proposed development. Aeeommendations contained in the report hove bean incorporated within the conditions of Approval in eha attached Resolution Cf Approval. The geotechnical investigation is currently under independent revLw by an outaida coneu It ant chosen by the city. C. ArDOriet Aewrt: The arborlet report idantif ied ZB mature tress of varying specie. on the sib. TM arborlet zeaommended that tM two lsrge palm trove (Naehingtonia robunta and Nuningtonia filifere) he relocated on the cite. several other trau (Pious canariensie, 'Cadru• daodara, Platanue aeerifolla( may oleo be relocated with probabL succap. The arboriet hu recommended that the remaining tree on-sib be removed. The removed tree. would b .object to the tree replacement eribri• in !M Tree Pruervation Ordinance. Pertinent conditions have been included in tM attached Resolution o[ Approval. D. Noise Studv: The site may be impacted by road noise free Pooihill Boca levsrd end Vineyard Avanw as indicated in tM Noise Blemsnt of the General Plen. A Nolee Study will 6e required to determine tM noise source and Uval, and propou a mit igatian and monitoring progrus to ensure the reduction of inierlor noise levels especially for Pads A, B, and C. An appropriab condition hu been included In tM attached Reoolution of Approval. staff conclude. Ghat there will pqj, be • significant effect on the environment in Lois cue beuuu of the mitigation measures which have been included in the project deign or a CondleLons of Approval within the attached Ruolution. TMnfore, if after rev Lewinq the prapoud mltlgat ion meaeure• epeclf led within [M Resolut Lon, the Commie. ion concur with etaEf'• !lndings, then iuuancs oC a mitigated Negative Declaration would Da Ln order. FACT3 POR lINDINGS: In order Eor the P1annLnq Commtuion to approve tM project, the following Cact• for findings mat be medu A. TM propogd uu is in accord with thr General Plan, the objectives o[ [M Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purpou• of the dletrice !n which the sib Ls Located. B. The propoud use, together with the condltion^ appllcsble .hereto, will not be detrimental to tM puDllc nee lth, utety, or welfare or mabrially injurious to propsrelu or Lmprovement^ !n the vicinity. II ao,(/iN J~ PLANNING COMMISSIOI. ~TAPP REPORT CUP 92-18 - SMITH'S Daesstar 9, 1992 Pages 10 The proposed uu eompl lea with each of the applicable provieiane of the Development Coda and Induetri al Area Spsc if ie Plan. CORReSPONOBNCE: Thie item bees Deen edvertisetl ae a pubic hearing in the Inland Vallw Daily Bul Ltin newspaper, the proj set hoe bun posted, and notice ware sent to all property owners within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. PECONMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CommU •ion receive all publ lc c~atimony on the project. If, attar raoaivinq •11 UaLimony, the Colamiu ion concurs with the Eindinga auggeNed, than Luuanee of a mitigated Negative baccarat ion and approval of Conditional Uu Pormit 92-18 through adoption of the attached Ruolution o[ Approval would bs in order. Ln addition, Ue Coemiuion shell review the propowd colors and roof tiles metsria 1, which will bs pzewnted at the public hearing, and make n racoamandatcon regarding [hair acceptability. Rupees submitted, Brad r City Planner BB:BN:mlq Attachment: 6xh iblt "A Exhible ^B exnibit ^c Exhibit "D Exhibit "E 6xh ibis "P Exhibit "G Exhibit "N Maolution -Existing Fareel• - SLte Plan -Grading Plan - Building 6lavationa - Traa Plan - Aet ivity Cantor - Penpect ive eketchu - [andscapa Plan of Approval X1195 ~~ a~P ~I ~~ ~ Ei I,-~ /i; i% ~, ~I ,, :.~ J ~, ~ ~ y+ i ' ~ 3 i fI I _! i~ f I ~° 0 ~~~ _~ ",_-- i ~~ .....~ 1 .-. ~":;:;'~.,'. ITEM: C[1Y OF RANCiCf.,CUCAMONGA TmE: ~xlstl-~ PwPr,E1.S N PLANNING DMSION EXHIBIT: Pc SCALE: odt~s~rppN I ? it i y ~' I II I I i1~ - Ii; r I~! l i ._ _ _ ~ r..._, j,I '' ,.. 1 i i a ~ l.~q~. '~ ci ;~~, ~~_, ~~ ~/ ,~ ... i~~, ,.; ~~% / I ~• ~' ~' ~~ /~ i i'N~ ~ l,~ ~'~, ~~ i I ~~ ,, ;M,+\ ~ w ~ til I ~ , i,~~i 1 •iswee s~iirseoi ,~ ,,.~~,, ;,, ~ ,, 1W ~~,. I, '~f ~~ fi ' ~I 'i ,~ ,s i~ h II I, !, 1 I i:~ ~'ii~ ~ ~. i~h ~. i ~f ., ~r_ Ij ~; II I~ ~I• Y ~_ I ~ II :~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ _. : ~ _ ` ITEM: y . CITY OF RANCFid.,CUCAMONGA TITLE: C 1Y~~~ 5i p~ 1Y PLANNING DMSION EXHIBIT: ~j SCALE: w ~1~19'7 .. ,~ .:.$ . `. [TEM: CI1Y OF RANC,fiCf.,CUCAMONGA PLANNING DMSiON TmE:1~ s ~ ~r.. ~~ 1Y EXHIBR: C SCALE: ~~ $ , ~pb298 ~~ O e_ ~~~ a~ µ~ F CCC F G U ~~ ~¢ J r~: .~ 4 i x :~: -7 r~ ~~i z z ~~ ~ , I~,OOM~~ ~~ ~~ f da I µ~7 w~ C ~ y `~ {~ ,~ U> ~~ y. z J~ 000:.00 u~,IAn J QOi~;:01 e e~,i5" N_ F U ~~ J ~: z i 31~ l w :1~~ ~os~;.~z c • q ~.....i x ~~ ~ a ~~ z ~~ ~~ ~,1~~~ ........ °~ _..... ,,1 ITEM: CuP A2 -IA CITY OF RANCFiCf.,CUCAMOIVGA 'f177..E_TPX.E ~~ N PLANNING DMSION ,,,,,,,_.,,~, EXHIBCf: ~ SCALE: ~i ~,`~~~ a~ i~ I 5 N u.~ J Ill:n Itl!IIII!Iln ~! ~, OQQ,;.04 ~i~,~qu /'~ ~ ~~ rr„~ Z J~ ~: ~E ~~ J > n v~ C' Z "~~"' ~" J~ ~ 000"..05 N ~~„ -u 1 c', ~i ~, ~~ ,~ II t ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ i „i I ~, III i, i i ! i~l~ ~IR ~R ~1 1 I ~_ cCW !- ~X+7 U~ ,-. - ~ rte- ~ ?' ~ z J~ Cflfl~46 u~.~i~~ s ~fi ; :.\~ f w ~ ~~ y ~ R J ~ Y :. i s ~W } W Y i 4 ~ _~ ~ Y y e i! ! ~ ~ : i i ~ ~ ~ _ r%~ - Y ~ .. p \ OOiI~'~ ~, ~ ~~n ^~~ f •, 1~ ~'.. ~~' _ ,• i~ . ; ~ 1 , 8 W , ~"'~.~~ ^ 9 i ~ ~ ~ ~ '. ' ~ i I :i: 1 (,~i W W J ,~ n - ~~ _~ Z r C C w J ."n. ~ ' ,; u '1 a ' ~~• #u:.:1 .,,~;j.,; lij d i '17 i .~ 3 . z++' :~ j .I ,' ~ ~ ~' "a ii~;' ~i;?If;i(i:i,~l ~? - i i~i!f ~s'lil~ i ~ ~~ ' ~s+~pp m s v ~ i I ' , .,,..,,,.. .,,, .,, .~ ,~~ ~ ~~ p ; a ~s-er __ _.. srier-rrr• rl ~~- :~ i j -~ il ~' ~ _ : a ' ~'' i ~I _„ , :, ~ = _ _ - f ~t _ _ _ 3~ / ' ~ '~ ~ :I ;i 71 i? Ii 1 ~~ 1 ^~ .• ~~ 1 1 ' • ? R j I ii~ ~ i 1~. ~ ~ 1 ~ f ' Mi~• ?li i 1 ~ >!~ a y~ ,_ ~- :! P~ OY -A /7001 77/Mi 00I O ~ --J' -- ! it - ; -____~w~~s_ J e ~ac~ =as `' ~,a~II ~~ ~ >~ a X ~ ad ~ '~ r jai ~ e ~'>1 ~' • i t,, II ~ i~~ Iki e a i~ i' _ s ~i li ' .j _~ "~_ ,! --_ i ~~ e _ _` 1 g ' 0 ~ ! ~ '~ _ ' -~~ i ~! i _ ~ J !si _' *' .j g ~ __ :.~ ~ • • "~., o ~ ' ~[ ~+`+ ~1 ~--i i'I -' ~ ~_ i!~ ~.~ . 3 OOtD~9 u ~ , ,~ ~.n RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF IUNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL VSE PBRMIT NO. 91-18 FOR THE OBVELOPMHNT OP A COMMERCIAL SN0PP2NG CENTER CONSISTING OP A 75,000 SOVARE FOOT GROCERY STORE, Two SATELLITB BUILDINGS OF 3,500 SQUAA6 PEST EACH, AND A DRIVE-THAN PAD OP 0,800 SQUARE FEET ON 10.6 ACRES O! LAND IN THE CONMUN ITY COMlRACSAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OP THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT TF1E NORTHWEST CORNEA OP FOOTHILL HOVLEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENV6, AND HARING FINDINGS SN SUPPORT THER60! -, APN: 107-101-03, 5, 8, 15, 10, 11 and a9. WIv1\1A-~-P,'}/ A. RecLgL. 1 (i) Smith'• Au filed an appllcat ion for the iouance of COndlt Tonal Uee Permit No. 91-18 as described in tM title of thi• Rnolut lOn. Hereinafter in thi• Ruolution, the euDjed Condit Tonal Ow Permit requgt i• referred to ae •the application." (LL) On tM 9th day Of December 1991, end continued to tM 15th day of December 1991, ehe Planning Cammiuion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an tM appllcat ton end concluded said hating on than date. (iii) All Legal prerequL ito prior to tM adoption of !hi• Resolution have occurred. B. NON, THEREFORE, it Ls hereby Eound, determined, and ruolved by the Planning CommiuLOn of tM Clty of gaucho Cucamonga a tollowa: 3. Thi• Conotisslon Mnby apeci[ically fLnds that all of the fsct• ut forth in ehe ReeiLaL, Part A, o[ ChU Resolution ate trW and correct. 1. Based upon subata0iial evidence presenbd to thi• Commiuion during ens above-rstermeed public nearing on December 9 and 15, 1991, including wri[ten and oral staff rsporb, together with public testimony, thi^ commies Ton MreDy specifically finds as follows (a) The application applies to property locaud at the northwest corner of -oothlll Bou levacd and Vineyard Avenue with a et rest Frontage of 770 tact along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth o[ 7E0 fast and i• present ly improved with a vacated roller rink and restaurant, • free-atandinq vacated ruteurant •nd usociated parking lot with landscaplnq, a vacaud turn ltuze store, and a one-story wood framed coidenes; and (b) The ptoperey to the north of tM subject site i• partially vaunt and partially davelopsd with two apartment buildings, tM property co the mouth of that aiu coneLst• of vacant property beyond Foothill Boulward, ehe property to ehe ust i^ Thomu Winery Plaza beyond Vineyard Avenue, and ins property to the west i• Cucamonga Cnanne l; and Q0(~~10 ,5N u y~ , PLANNING COMMI99ION t ,OLUTION NO. CVP 92-1e - SMITH'S December 19, 1992 Page 2 (c) Ths subj ai property i• designated Conwunity Commercial by the Foothill eoulevard Spec iEic Plan; and (d) The project nquin• she demolition of [M exist inq roller rink and netaurant buildings ae wall a the single family •iructun located ai SO1O Vineyard Avenue, which wee built by the Thomas family for workers and family member •. A Cultural Aeeourn Study i• currently being conducted by a Society of Profusional Archaeologists (SOFA) certified consultant; and (e) The project •ib itult may also be dgni[ieant •inee it wu eravenad Dy local Native Americana prior to the arrival of the Spanish explorers; vets an integral pact of the Tiburcio Tapia Rtncho de Cucamonga, which includes the Thomas Ninety built in 1839; wu part o[ the ground Gransportat ion system o[ generations of Americans including the ButGrfisld stage coach, tM Pacific electric railway and Route 66i and was the location of tM [int poet o[!in in Chs aru. The Cultural Resource Study will debrmine the •ignilicancs of these items as well ae ncoaaaend mLCigat ion aruusu. 3. eased upon iha subsGnt lal evidence pnunted to Ghls Ca®SUion during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the epcilic findings of facts pi forth in pazaquphe 1 and 2 above, ihL Caaaiaslon Nnby finds and concludes a [ol lowu (a) That ins proposed uu i• in accord with the Central Plan, the objactivH of CN Development Code, and the purgoNa of the district in which the siU is located. (D) That the proposed uo, togetMr with tM conditions appllcabl• thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or maurially in juriou• to propartin or impcovemenu In the vicinity. Icl Thai tM proposed we campliss with each o[ the applicable provLlons of the Development Coda and Foothill Sou lsvard Spec Lflc Plan. a. TAL CoawLslon hereby Llnds and care ilia that Cha prof wt ha^ heen reviewed and conKdeted in compliance with tM GllfornLa Lnvironmenul pus lity Act o[ 1970 and, further, thL COmmlalion hereby louse • mit igated Negative DaeLrat ion. 5. Bub upon the finding^ •nd conclusions ut forth in pangrapn• 1, 2, 3, and d above, this Camniuion Mreby approves tM applLCat ion subject ec uch and every condl[LOn set Coreh halor •nd in tM Standard Condit ions sttaeMd hereto and incorporated herein by Chia reference. 1) Upon completion of the Cultural Roources Study currently being condueeed by a SOFA care i[isd consulunt, •11 mlt Lgation msuune and rsconanandation^ contained than in, as call as addlt tonal ^ite plan conaideution• and Q®0`:11 n p, ., ~ u V~ " PLANNING COMMISSION 'SOLUTION NO. CVP 92-38 - SMITH'S December 15, 1992 Page 3 environwntal mitigations, shall be incorporated into the pro)ect design. All ovLtandinq iuuu and any revisions and/or modifieat Lon• required by the Study shall be rwiswed 6y the Hiata[ic PraNrvation Commie ion and tarwarded to the Planning Commission for final approval prior to the iuuancs of grading permit ^. 2) Prior to the demolition of any siructun on tM pro)ect •iCa, t complete demOlit ion albtltoe survey and abatement plan shall N required and shall W sub)eet to rwiew and approval Dy the Building O(f ieia 1. 3) Large canopy trees within the parking lot shall be planted for ahadinq at a rate of one tree per thrN parking stalls. 6) A Vniform Siqn Program shall G submitted and rwlewed and approved 6y the Design Awiew Coamittss prior to ehs issuance of bu ildinq perm it e. 9) All future building pads shall be ceded and Lrrigatsd far erosion control. De4iled plena, including landscape and irrigation, shall W sabmltted to the PLnninq DLVis ion prior to CN luuance of building permits. 6) OnlEcrm hardscaps and street furniture (lneludinq eating benches, trash receptacles, [rw-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, sec.) shall W utLlized and be compatible with the archluctural style of the cenur. Ostailsd deign shall G wbmitted for Planning bivUion rwlew and approval prior to eM iuuanee of building permits. 7) Truh eol lest ion eAall occur between eM hour of 9 a.m. and 30 p.m. only. 3) Craf tits eha 11 bs removed within 72 hours. 9) All open[iona and bu etneuu shall be conducted eo comply with the Eol lowing acandarde which obeli be incorporated Into ens lease agreement Of all tenantu a) Nclw Gvel - All commsrc ial activ It its shall noc cnau any nolu shat you ld uwsd an eater for no lea level at 60 d! 000:12 q ~,~~(( PLANNING COMH I33ION .OLUTION NO. CUP 92-18 - SMITH'S December 15, 1992 Page 4 tluring the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a. m. or fi3 d9 during the bouts of ] a.m. to 10 p.m. b) Loading and Unloading - No person shall caue the load inq, unloading, apeninq, closing, of other hsndlinq of bozo, crates, containers, buildtnq materials, garbage cans, or other similar oDject• 6etwen the hours of 10 p. m. and 7 •.m., in a manner which would cause • noise tlisturDanee to a residential arses, unleu othetwiae specified herdn. 10) Provisions for the following design Luturea in tN trash enclosure to the satlstaction of Ue City Planner: •) Arehitectutaily integrated into the design o! the shopping center/project. b) separate pedetrian acwu chat does not require the opening of the main doors and include self-closing pedetrian doors. c) barge enough to accommodate twa Grub bins. d) 0.011-up doors. •) Trash bins with counter-weighted lido. [) ArchiNCeurally Gretad over Mad shade ere11 U. q) Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing aut of the encloeun and de igned Co he hidden from view. 111 TM stirs •lu •M11 W kept tre trpa treh ana debris at all times, and in no event shall tech and debrL remain far more than 2a hours. 12) X13 futon pad development within tM ^hopp Lnq cmtst shall be deigned to De compatible with tM •rtablisMd archiuttural program. 17) TM lightinq tixtun design conupt shall caapl lment eM arch iteetural program. IC shall include she plaza area lighelnq [lxeurea, Duildinq lightinq fixture )eeerlor), and parking loe 11ght1nq fixtures. OQtl~:13 u ~, AN PLANNING COMMISSION ;OLUTION NO. CVP 9Q-18 - SMITH'S Oecemper 15, 1991 Pe9e 5 la) Ayproval from caltrans shall be required fo[ drainage acceptance (under sidewalk drain) and work within their right-ot-way prior tO iuuance of q[adinq permiie. 15) A .lope dralnege aeceptame letter eha 11 be required prior to iswance of gndinq permit. 16) Naxlmum/minimum height. of all walla and .lopes shall W indicated on the final grsding plan. 1J) The Neater Plan L approved in concept only. hture dwelopment far Pads A, 8, and C shall be subject to wpatate bwelopment /OU L9n Mwlew proses !or Planning eammLaion approval. Modlficatiou to tM (shopping emter/Muter Plan) eRall M aobjeee to Planning Coemlealon approval. 18) The Wrminq along Foothill Boulward adjacu[ to the drive-thru Lne shall G • minimum of ] tut Ln height aDOVe the lane in order to edequab ly aerun earn. 19) Spec Lal pavement shall G provided acrou eireulatlon •ie le, peduerlan walkway, and plara. TM pavewnt shall De of btltk/tile pavers, exposed aggreqaG, intequl color concrete, or a combination of them. Pull camp/ea shall W submitted Eor Clty Planner nvlew and approval prior to iuuance of Dulldinq permit. Special paving shall be provided In trout of CM entire entryway acrou the driveway. ZO) The retaining wall. along Vineyard Avenue and -oothill Boulward shall W tzuted with the taw type o[ rock that will W provided on the grocery store building front. Z1) The foothill Boulward Activity Centr landscape concept shall eontlnw fcam eM corner eo iM channel .long foothill Boulward and from the corner to the nottNrly driveway .long Vineyard Avenw. Terraced rock wall. ahsll G provided to minimlu Z:1 .lopes. 3Z) TM three pad Du ild logs (A, B, and C) shall Lncorpoun tM approved rock material Cor the Smleh'a store !root into the lr deign scAew. OOQ214 ~,~n PLANNING COMMISSION .OLUTION NO. CVP 92-18 - SMITH'S Dsemmber 15, 1992 Page 6 27) If thm two bu Sidings at CN eornmr u• no! dewlopsd at the •ams time a thm grocery Sion, than thm atrNtaeepe wtback arN .hall W fully dwelopsd up to the pads and thm pads shall ba lande<apad for sromlon control. 14) A tlat boa ahmlbr flat loot it pszmi a iblmj however, thm roof .hall bm solid in order Co provide •11 weNher protaotion. VSnN may bm LncorporNSd adjwmnt Go tha auppozeinq columns in ordmr to wfNn tN structure. 25) TRe applicant shall work with staff during the plan check proue• in ordmr eo dsGrmine thm most approprLU speclN of palm trNS at the ingnect ion. 26) TM uw of aortal pips handrail is acwptablm on • limited buia whN nsedmd adjaemnt to eiairways) but must W archltmcturally intsgnted within chm plaza hasdseape design in Berms of color and scalm. 27) The psdNtrlan sntrucm to CM tut food pad shall W treated with • mpecialty paving similar to chat i^ proposed adjacNt to the Smith'. storm entunes )aeormd conentm wish a broad [inish). 28) TrN Removal Pmrmit 92-11 i• approved eubj wt to thm Col lowing: a) TM mxlstlnq wuhinmtonis rr,.~,, Maahinatonia flli[era, P1nu CanariaNie, Cedrus dsodara, and Platuue aeerifol is shall G relocated on tM •!te and indicated on thm [1na1 landscape plus which .hall bm nvlmwmd and approvmd by the City Planner prior to CM Lsunes of bu Lld lnq permits. bl Tha remaining trmw .hall W rauaowd and nplantmtl on • onm-to-onm bN l• with eM largnt grown nurwry stock avallaDle. Speelu and location shall be lndlcatmd on thm final landsoape plan to 6e reviewed and approvmd Dy thm City Planner prior to the iuuuem of bu Siding permits. 19) Recommendation of the "Preliminary CeoNChnical Invutigat ion" prmpacmd by Lmighton and AmapC Sato, caeca September 30, 1991, shall be 000,::15 u ~, ~/i PLANNING CONNISS ION iOLUT ION NO. CUP 92-13 - SMITN'8 December 15, 1992 Page 7 incorporated into the project design with prtinent infocmat ion noted on the final grading plan which shall be reviewed and approval Dy the Building O[[icial prior to iuuanee of grading permits. Vpon completion of the independent geotachnical analyaL currently 6einq conducted, any additional revisions and modifications contained Lherein shall G incorporated into tM project design. 30) A final noiu study/accoustical sport shall W prepared with any recosmendaeions and mitigation measuraa incorporated into tM tinal pzo)ect dulgn. The final nolu study shall W reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building psrnite. 6nOineerlna Division 1) Constroc[ CN entire Ungth of San Sernarlino Road full width from Vineyarl Avenue westerly (including the cul-dreac Dulb). Of[-alb strwt trove and sidewalk may W deferred until dewlopmsnc of the ad)acant property. TM dweloper may requut • relmbunearnt agraament to recover CM coat of oft-cite improvraent• from future development/rsdswlopernt as it occurs on ad)acent property. 2) Foothill Boulevard ^hall b• constructed as follows, subject to modi[ScaCion by and approval of Calt canes al N11 Lmprovswnt• on the noeth side [rom Vineyard Avenue to the Cucuaonga Creak bcldge with neeeuary transition as debrslned by CM Clty Lnglneer and a coa~bined right turn lane and bus bay tram the inbnection to CM wesbrly pro)sct driveway. b) A landscaped median [rom tM interact ion with Vineyard Avenue to tM center of tM Cucamonga creek bridge to the utieface ion of tM City Engineer. 1f Coltrane doss not allow a single segment, in-limo Ceu will W required in conformance with Cond pion No. 3. c) Thirty-ewo [ne of pavement on the mouth •Lde of the mad lan. ~Viiw1G a 6..~~11 PLANNING COMMISSION ._dOLVTION NO. COP 91-18 - SNITR'S December 15, 1994 Plge B d) The dewLOper maY cequwt a raimburtemant agreement for paxmanant impravemants mouth of the eenterl ins, including halt of the Landscaped madlan eosU, frwt future dwQopment a it occurs on the south •ide of Che etrNt. 3) It Caltrane dwe not 611ow conat:uction o[ eha median island within foothill EouUvard, than an in-lieu tN !or one-hal! the coat of eha construct ion, lncludinq Landecapinq and irrigation, shall W paid to the City prior to iuuance of building permits. TM tN for eha msdlan Lland shall b• 6aaed on the dUtanee between eha canter line of Vineyard Avenue and tM canter of the Cucamonga Crwk bridge. 4) Acquire necessary additional right-ol-way and construct pavement to w~_ien Cha moat •ide of Vineyard Avenue tram Foothill Eoulwud southerly to provide safe lane transitions toz tM relocation at the Vineyud Awnus unterline to the ueisLetion Of tM City Engineer. The dwelopsr may csqueat reimbursseent agresmsnt to recover the core of oft-site pecmansnt improvements from future development/redwslopment a it occur on adjaant property. 5) Overhead Util it Ses: a) The ex Set inq overMad ut ilitiu (Nlecommunication and electrical) shall a unOergtcunded as to lbws: 1) Loothill Boulwazd - on Us project •ide of !hs street tram the first pole on CM most ^!de of Cucamonga Crwk to and inc lutlinq the Last pole easterly. il) Vineyard Avenw - on the project •ide aL !M acrgt from and including tM L/nt pole south of San sernardlno Road Co and includlnq tM last pole southerly (all remain lnq lines and removal of existing poles). iii) on-a1G - from tM flea[ pole on the noon •ide o[ San Bernardino Road to and includlnq the last pole a~c~:.s~ 11 a , y~~R PLANNING COMMISSION :OLDTION NO. NP 9Z-18 - SMITH'S Deeamber 15, 1991 Page 9 (on-site) north of Foothill Boulevard (along the vacated portion of San Diego Avenue). TM develops[ may requut a rsimburamnt agremnt to recover one-half the Ciiy adopud Bost Eor undergroundinq from future development/redevelopment a• li occurs on the opposite aids of Foothill BouLVard. b) An in-lieu fN a eontribution to the future undergroundinq (San Bernardino Road) and reimDUrsmnt for previously undergrounded (Vineyard Avenue) overhead utilities (tsl¢osmunieation and •Lctriul) on the oppoeiN •ide of ehs street shall bs paid to tM Clcy prior to the iasuanw of bu Lldinq permits. TM fn shill W one-halt the City adapted unLC amount eLaea the [ollowinq lengehs~ i) San Bernardino Road - the length of she pro~ece frontage. li) Vineyard Avenue - tram LM north pro)ect boundary Co tN senor o[ Foothill Boulevard. 6) An Ln-lieu fee ar relmbursmnt for serest improvmnt• completed on iN west •!de of Vtmyard Avenue per reimbursmnt agremnt in effect ^hall M paid to the Cliy pr LOS Lo LM iasuanp of building permits. 71 Madlt ications and relocation, if neceuary, of the tut[lc signal at the lnunectlom o[ Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenw, shall De the ruponaibil ity of the developer. TM relocation and mod i[i<ation shall W to the aatistaetion o[ the City Engineer. S) Construct [M local storm drain pipe Ln Foothill Boulevard from eM ea LLlnq conneeelon at Che intersection of VLneyard Avenue to Cucamonga Creek to the utLtact ion at the Clty Engineer. 9) ^NO Parklnq/Seopplnq^ signs sMll W posted •lonq the tronuqu of foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue and a ^No Trueks over 3 Ton" sign shall W posted on San 8ernardine Road. OOQ':18 u ~,3,,)) PLANNING COMMISSION :GLUTTON NO. CUP 92-1B - SMITH'S December 15, 1992 Page 10 10) M in-lieu Cu for onr fourth the cost of constructing spacial pever• within the Foothill Boulward/Vineyard Avance intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of buildLnq psrmlts. The Eee aequni shall be based an the equate footage of the inbrsset ion. 11) Consistent with Lhe foothill eoulevard Specific Plan, the vaNr element a[ the northwest corner of Poothill Boulevard and VLnsyard Avenue shall W located outside the public right-of-way. Buildinc a Safety DSvlslon 1) Approvals Etas San Bsrnardlno county Health, Cucamonga County water District, and school district shall G required prior to tM iuuanee of bu ildinq grmits. In addition, AQ3~ approval may W requital It hazardous materials are aced, handled, or stored. 6. The Secretary to thL Comm/salon atoll cart lfy Co tM adoption of thin Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15 TR D3,Y OP DECLMSLR 3992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THL CITY OF RAMCMO :UCAMONGA BY: Larry T. NcNlel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Swrstary o[ the Planning Commie ion of tM City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hsrsby cart lty that the forsgolnq Resolution wu duly and raga Lrly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commin ion o[ the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a requ lar mwtinq o[ tM Planning CoamL•icn Mid on the 15th day of Dscsmber 1992, by tM following voerto-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: OOQ~19 ) ~.~~,u ~~T. or DEPARTMENT OF 71B+OACNO CUCd1Y0YY0A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PRQIECT a: C<J~ f2~~g sue~ECr: _ or1 at~ci:Y1 ~a ~~~ //~~i LOCATION: /~1LdG /1Tr41'/L /!/ II[/~ rnoaa n.ms dradtW an CaMMbrta a Appovr. APPLICANT Sl16LL CONTACT THE PLANNt1Y6 ONIlNON . (ltq /N•1M1. lWll COAiL1ANC8 WRl1 THE FOLLOWING CONOrtgNtl: A. TMta L4naa ~_ t. ApprWrlMY azaN, unlaa axMgad W dta pWatap CammYabrt, Y taiadaq panrita ara nol eauad a approval tw hr not mmmrradvAlYn Z4 ngMMnorrtllN Ora a approval. 2. DEW WpIMnVDMIgn FNvNw Yh~Y by app10w0 plbf b ~ r 3. Appravr a TanlrNS Trod NO. M gataW laY1~aG4 b tM approvr a A. TMdwabparulottmmarca, panitlpau nu aridOOnralanraaoauMb WfbrtKMnCaO. prllcgalW in„utortauttattrae. ^ Aaado-Floaa CambMy FaWYa Dlaaki ICED) fa dx Raridb Cutrnwtpa Fka Pbladlon DYakt b ntrrtta torrlntdon ands maaaanrloa d a nn statbn to prva tlr dWabptMra. TM rrbn ahM W bcaM0. dwlvnd. aro OuYI b at tpricYicatbna a ttr Ralblb Cueartnnpa Fka PtaNdbn Olrrld. and ahal batoma iM DWrkra praparty upon oorttplrbn. TM aattpltM aMY W aalaaad W tln OMakt in aocadanca wYh b naWa. b atry hrYAYq a a radon. tM eavalopar altal tARrPN vrilh aY appncaDia lava and rapulrblta. TM CFD eMa W bmNd by dN Diaakt and qN dWropar oY tfN lima raoordrbn a tM Ilrtal ntp ooraua. ~Waalar ~J_ JJ- -J_J- ~J- 5. PAOr to racadatbn a dla tMW map a IM laatwtoa d hulOYtp pamYb, whkliwar tarrw! Iktt. IM applicant ahY aaManl to, or panidpata N, t!N aGabaaMtMnl a a MaYo-Roos Can+rramay FadWin Drtrld for tM tortrnrcmn artd ntaYtlwwba a naoaaaary rlCtbol IadNlha. Howwar, Y any aGtda 0Wb1 hp praviouaty aataetuttad futh a CdrtatIUIMY FadNllas DisMd, tM appMcata ahM, in iM rlamrNa, oaNra b UM atrlaaalbn d tM prgjad Lila ntto tM IartYory a atctl aY4tlrq Diaabt prbr b Uw raardrbn a tlta tYlr map or Iha uaUarba a OuYdnp pamYla, vMlctiWar torts Ika1. ftatlMf, Y IM aMadad adtool drat hA rla brrrNd a YNIIo-ROOa CarYnunily FaeYMlaa Ortrld wN1Yn bvaNa ntgntM Irom tM dra of approval d tM projad arW prbr b iM raaotdrbn a nta Ilnr map or nwante ~, a owioinQ prtmW br said projad, tllia owtditbn ahY l» daamad nuY and wid. JJ- x x/at CSOQ~ti~ II ~ ~35 ~~~ ~.0 92-.a t Th4 oorMkbn sMa M warve0 d tM Cay receives rbtl~ ttrm iM appaCem and aN ane!tad sdgol d[slrfda nave emered'eno an aproemem ro givmery accomnodme arty and as sciswi irrgacla ae a roeuk d tMs Drolact. ___~___ 6. Prbr to remrdmbn or iM Ilnm map or prior 10 iaauaraa d Eua6rtp psmVb wMn no map e involved. wrath csnincmbn from tM anapsd wmadlsirkx ttW adpuata sawsr and wmar lacilkies aro «wNl M avaaaEle to serve tM proposed projad staa M suwrsttad b dw Cepanmem or Comrtunay Devabpmars. Such Naar mum ttava baert bauad Ey tM wmsr tlbtrict wanin 5otlays parro finm mapapprovm MtMtaead suEONhbn «pnorb iswanu of perrrsls in IM case of ak dtbr residaraW projecYS. 8. SIN Dwmoprnarn _ p_. _ 1. The sea snaa be tlevabpW antl mekrNined In aooordanp wIM IM apppved pNm wltieh include sae pNrn. arMkadural aNvatbn, arirlor maNMN and cobs. tandaca0aq, sign Pro9r>rm, antl padnp on fM b iM PlwWq pNlalpr6 tly OOriAbry Caraaatad Mein, Devabpmara CoW reouwbrr, and dal BIv1. Spaeab Pfan.+sd' 2. Prbr to arty use d iM prolaG sae a EuaalaM adlvay DaYtp carrarrnad ataraon, aw Corgai«m of Approvm snY W oorrglma0 b ify aatlmaclbn d aN Cay Plaraur. 3. Occupancyd IM fadaty shY nd mnwrtarca unN auchtleta as M UNOnn drildktp Code and Sfma Fln Marsha's nqulmbrs ttav~ Egan carr9aad wah. Ptbrb ooalpafby, DNna snort ba aubnaltad ro ma Randq Cuomnonpa Fln Praadbn ONtrktarrd ay BuArarp and Smary Diviebn b snow oongaarioa. TM buadktp ahaa M krpaGad far oortpartoa prbr b occWanO'. _~ 1. Rwuad eaa pNra and OuiMinp ayvalbn in00rpor>tYlp as C«tdaory d Apprwm than W sudnitlad 1« City PNnrrar ravNw artd apwwm pn« b iaarmrlu a Mrida4 parrrYta. 5. Ak sea. prarlkq,lmalaape, iRgatlon, anOatraNirrpovanara pan tlylMcoordYUtW br rnreetancy pdato itaartca a arty parmaa (eucn n yraAltp, ores rmbval, anawNaMrn, Wildatp , mc.l. « prbr ro IaW map approvm in ity rasa a a wabm n wDOAriaion, or approvatl use rota miaroanad, whbMvN conraa faaL -~ u. Appmym d tnN repose soak na waM conpaarroa wan all aatabrta a tl» o.wwprMrn Cade, a1 oayr aPPacaEN Cay Orlslyrtoaa, aM appacaEN CamaallY Plw or SpCak Plarro n aaaq m dta Iary d Brrtlrq Parma yWYtp. X 7. A dmaiNd On-aaa aplllkq pan tfral Ea yvlawW at10 aplrovat! EY fly CaY PIWyf arx SMrat's DaparMyra (9!Plt111 ~ pA« b IM saurtca a ErAlArq parmb. Suet pan sMl irldiCale shN, iauninmion, kadllon, tylQfa, an mmnd a atwldap w as not b advmen snag ad(anra Dropufya. 9. n ro canfraaxW traan ranpladn aro provkMd, Y Each pldrrq retell W tar atdwterm una. wan as reaplacMa anNldad Irom pubac vNw. J___/- JJ- J-J- J~_ J~- J~- J.-/- _J-/- J-' - _~ 9. trash nupudNp an roWirad ane ahaa rnM Cay taandar0a. The Ilrtaldaalpn, boson. ~' ~'- and ay ralnt0ar d rtaah nagataaa aftatl M auojaq ro CYy Planyr ravNw anti approval pt« ro isauana d Euildatp pamtas. 10. Aa prourtWmouAW utilay appunanrbaa such as Iranelarrltan, AC cortderyars, ab., mall ~li - .. . ba bated aut of pudic vyw an0 adequately scyartW tlagph iM ufa d a mmOnatipn of concrma or masonry waae, bermmp, anaor NtWacapaq p tM aNipagbn d tM Cay PNnne. C~Q~'i22Y ~,,, sc siet aena tt ~,~bn s~m~ 71. SVNN names shall De erbrtNted Ior CM Planner review and approval in accordance with tM adopted SIraM Narrarp Pdicy prior ro approvat of the final hWl, _~ 72. AN Wildelg fumDers arM Nblvidual unas shall [b identNbd in a char and mrnba manner, incaldkrg I>foDer NbmNlatbn. 13. A detailed pW indkpirq trail widths, maaimrm slopes, ptryelcal corldNbra, lerroirq, afM weed mdra, in accordarce with City Mayer Trail drawige, ahae W sudrMrrd br Cay P tanner revew and approval MIDr to approval and reaOrdaa0rl a iM FNgI Trap Map and Drb r ;o approvalot meet improvemsra and gradlrgpana. DwetoperetlaN upgrade and construe aq treas. irreklOirtq lsncirq arW drainage devices, in oorlrunetbn weh prNl NrpovemeMS. t 4. The Covenant. Corrdebrn and bt owners b auOdNbiora ahae have ttM d appeawlg to tloaros a alr.ctaa a CCBRS. eW notprohONtM kesplrgdaquins ~ rgaaN ererllakwNltouldb rlecassity aaaodrbn Ior rlrrarldnlara to the t 5. TM CovanaMa, ContlNbro, aria Reathelona (CCBRa) and AnkJN a Nborporalbn d the Horneormers' Aaaoeipbn an slrOiee b da approve d ttw PyrrYtp and ErpYtaedrq DWiebra and the Cay Atlpney. TMy shat W ramrdad oorlplmnay wah iM flr1Y Map or Prbr ro tM bwarlcs a W NdbO pemas, wlrkJlwer omen nrp. A raoa0ed Dopy ehaN M provided to fM CNy Erginaar. 18. AllparNwayt, open anae.and W WaupkgstW W panronarah mYnlaYlad DytMpraparty owner, horrteorvran' aaodpbh, or oiler maw aceaptaDb b ate CNy. Praot d oNa larldaeaps maiMwrrce shah W subnehW br Cly PlarNler and Clry ErlpMaer revew and approval prbr ro iswarla d Ouildlrlg pemWS. t 7. Solo atseae aaement a11eA W rladkaad Ior tl1a purpose a iMImYIQ t11p each b1 or dwellNlg ur1N shah haw dM npFN b rereMe erNINQIM stew adpoara lot a unb br ua a a sow wrpy 6ypem. The eaaentanle may G oantaNaa in a DaWralbn a RaaONdbns b~ tn. suodlvision wllkh e11aN I» nmrded oorlaaranlty wah ttw noordpbn a tla IN1e may o. Tswana o1 pemtils, wlNCMvN aomn fNp. Tla eaenlarn paN prohEa the oapeq o shadows try vepetplan, aouwlrea, IMUrp M any odar obNa, eaaq for Wley wlm arx sirrliW o0japa, paweab DawbptnaM Cade Sepbn 17.00.00o-1}2. 18. TM projap rnraaaa a dseyplpad Htbrbe 1ar10rtWk TM aM pall W dewbped and maireawad b aoeoroarba 1rNt1 tla t•Nelorb t.ar10n1ark Aaeralbrl PrwrtM Na. . Arty IurtMr nndllkplar b IM aMe NrdutlNlp, Out rb1 rtNted b, eabrbr aaeratbna andror interior aaeratlatawhlchttMeplta elttedwatMOuNdNpaar tltlUCltMea, rertwe d tndmark trees, dertoNlbn, rabepbn, remrWnldbn a buedNlpa or prualMee, arryartpee to the srte. shah reAUlre a RladNlapbrl b tta NletOrla l.ar101i1arl{ ANarpbn Palnp Y~1 b Httonc Preaarvatlon Comnsabn revew w approve. C. Bulldlrp Design J-J_ _/J~ JJ, JJ~ ~~- JJ_ JJ- ~~ t An aaerrutlw sharpy sypem h repaired b provitM dalMaOa 1101 weN br all dweNYp unny _ and Ior Matirp any ewilrNrellp pool a spa. antes oiler etmeke erargy eypaeta an OemaMrpW b a a eoHlwNte aapaaaY art etlkbrtcy. AN aaramiNtgpoota katried a tla tirta d irlitie davebprrlaM ahae a eupplemamed wtl1 !OW Mpktg. oeaNe pup a ~rlc4ded N1 IM Ouildklg ptra and ef1aN G etAlneted tar CNy Ramer rwielr and approval poor to tM ieauallce a builttkq permit. 2. AN dwellings dull have tM IroM, side and oar pevpians upgratls0 wNh arr;llNapural treatment, ONONinp and increased dpiMegn d woes trspmare suDpa b Cay Pinner revrew and approval prior to swans d Wildktg parmNS. sc.=rat ~oru dQfA2`a'2 G++P a,.••m.e g2'IQs ~Immnax: 3. t;wndard pffib aorsr dells for use by iM Flonteowners' Atlsodalbn ehaA G sU6lMltetl la J_ J_ cNy PWrter aro BuNeMq alkiai rsvww and approvY fxbr ro iaeuarlcs a buNdrq psrmes. ~a. AN roof appuMnaroes, ilAanO aircondtbrwrs and otMrrod trrourltW equiprMmandror JJ_ ixoNdbM, ettaNlls anietdedttamview arNtM sound btMend from ad)aum propenNs and Streel6 as reQOifed by 1M Planran0 Clvision. SuCb sasnWq stW M ardWeCNriNy ide0rated wIM tM buNtlYtp deslOn arld oorxstnx:7e0 to tM aatlelaotbn d tM CNy Planner. Details stwN be irlydtrded ill Ouildkg daM. D. PaMlnp and VMkuW ACCaa (IfrYdle delYN Orl OIIIMNIO pima) t. M perkin0 bt Iendeeaps 4gftdt attaN YNVe a rrtMwtum auUltla t1YMMbn d B Iat ano snaN JJ- coraain a 12-Nldt wak adpant b iM padtYp aW (NeYrdrlp aub). . X 2. Textured pedatrhn pYhwaye aM wxaxW Parem.r+ adoa airoarbtt arw eMN a -~--/- Prw'ided lfxgpf 1o1A dM devebprnert b cellrled dwNrpaAwYlNAtf W 4t0a witlf o W n tpeaU dazaNreueatioMl uaa. 3. M PeMMq spaeea ehaN a double Wpetl per Gry tsarNards arrd N drlwwaY aieiee, JJ- snfrarces, artl exits anea W alriped per CNy tdYtdatda. ~. M urns slnll W Provided wah OraOe door opaMn M dttwlwaya w lea tMn t! IeN b -/-/- depth howl batik d aidawsac S. 7MCowMnla. COMlbflfand Reaa'IdbrM anMreWldategorapdrsosatlonY vtrftiewa J-~- on tfYa sb unNas tMy are nM prattipal aourw d tranlporWbft Nor tlr oaew am prohEN parkln0 en NdNbr dralYbn alYa 011tar Own N dapf Wad vWOr puMYq araM. ~_ e. PWe br arty ~b OYa e1wN W alibnatlW for Or CNY Plararar, CITY fir, arxt J~- AancM Cticatmrga Fke Prdatdbn DYtrktmiawam agaovalpflorbMausroad buYdlrq perrrlaa. E. LJIMeCadnO (tor Pt~kb ~~~ YndaosM aesss, nlar b >Isdbn N.) t. AONaAWIaMaeeapaaoAhgrbnPNn,UcMdtgYbpO0WYO4andngONMma W4cap- -J~- irq b tM cate d rsabarMW ttavabprrwfs, Yts1 M pnpafs0 OY a Noansad landaaaPe ardtllaq and eubnYOW 10r CNy Piwtar tMawandappfoval pbrb UlaMauarroad WIMNq perfrws or prbr iirW map apprbvY M tha twae d a oupom W aubabWOn. 2. ExbtlrtOtnearpuWdbMpraafvedinp4oaaMlbaplowdadwtltsoNWnwlbntfarrNr J___1- m a00ordYloareiMlON AMntICgI000s SWbll /9.00.110. altl as 1bNdoflNwptlflpplaM. 1Te bcrbndlhoae OSabOa prasnW In plop aM rwrr bralbrrfortrrdplanlad Oau snaNbeYtuwnonOtetfYWaOlartdacapspons. TMapONOYSaMAbbwYidtlMarboMPs remnxnargYbfu npardln0 pnananon, lranaplawn0 am UntmNO mallbda. 9. AnWMmurnd_Ifaapargwsaaen•COmpAaWdaMbbwatpY7a,YtMMptovWW J~~- wAhinlMpm(eG: %•{O-inchbOxawrgar, %-36Nrhboxar4ryar, _ % • 24 inCft box tN larper• _ X • tSysson, aM _ % • S gabn. __,~j__ {. A minimum d ~_%d vas DNtMW wiOSn Ms prapq YtY W apadman ells vase • i -~- . 24irtM box or Wqr. 5. VYdhin paMNq bta, tfas atoll ba denied al a raw d orw is-pMbn lra br avNy tMae I - - paMtfq alaNa, lUfNCNflI to ahada 50% d fM paMinq area Y Polar ttibn on Au0ua121. 000223 SC • I/91 { of 17 Y JT,/N 8. Iran ahYM pWAatl in aroasofpubAC view adlaeenl to and abrp saueluros at a rate of one ine par 30 hMar IaK C CuiMYip. ~7. AAprhrde abpeaann5feet«NuinvMkW Miphl anda5:1 «graaNrabpe. but lase than 2:1 abpe, aMa W, al minrrbm, wripalW and iandecaDed wile appropdafa yourzf cover br aNaiOn dellea. SbW Pl+ntkq re0uvea ar ihN eadibrt stall i11CMrde a parrnafrarA fnipation syalerll b W etataMd ~1r dte dwebper prbr b ecagartq. _~9. AApnvbe ebpeeinezqsadSfM.bN lsaaOlantllNt invaRkalnaiptlt argaz:l«¢aalM Steps etl9A Delan~' adaM pll~ad tOf alWbn Gef111d a11~1O f011MifMk appaaiLlCan toaows: one t 5-yalbn «iarparaaa tree par each 150 ap. R. a abpa area. t yalbn «tvgar sae slwu0 Wrsach t00 sa. rt. d elope area. arM appbprWepoundoovar.In addAbn, abpa Hance b exau a e Net b vMkal triya and d 2:1 «grealar abp aMA also irtclitde one 5-yWbn « iaryAr aae tree par each ?50 aq. R. a pope area. Treaa and alatths AtgN W ptaraed h slapparW Nratera b Aalan and vary atepa Dlalla. SIApa platMai9 fagUYad 0Y t1aA section fhY ireArde • pamtarrarA idgatbn AYMertt b W arMaAad Ay dta davebpar prbr b T• 9. For s+Vw tam9y reaidantlal OevebpmerA, Y ebpe phnlrp and Nripalbn aMA W owaaar- ouey maYnatred ina Ma111yanddMVaptprglbn CYau devakparurtleach>rlAlMualurrA is eobandacopNdeylMaurer. prbrbnMrirtp0acvparrrybrttbruNa,anYwpedton sMA M cvrtdcxsW W tM PIanW7p DMafon b OaNnrArta Mal tAay era h aatletaaory mrtdYtlon. 10. FoemWFlalttily ryldarAial and tbrrraeideraW sAMe br tM coraMatal rrWtaelrarrca d a/ ~ Dbl>Mr OYRNIA are rapon• UItlAOAPAd atw ar-tR~, r wN u omAlptoua ptanpd areas wAhYl Me puOAe rglAq~waY. N IYIOAOapad areas altd a kepi has iron waetla and dAbrr aro Ir1a11AaAlAd b . MYIy AIM MrMY4 dwtaworr, and shall tAIYNa regular vn+n+rw, tenWritlp, mowatp, am mrm+y. Anr eaniapaa, dAad. dr.aa, « daaarbo W.rA mat.nal aMA a npacAd wAhM so IlarA hom tlta dale a dsttlape. t t .Frond taro iartaAaapltp aMA w raAurad pK iM t)aeAbprrlan Coda and rot . Thla raptitattlets Attp M h aOaAOn b IIrA nputrW stmt traeA and abp plaalrq, _~ 12. The ArW dsgn a iM pA1MlalAr padtwayA, waY, esq. and AHawaArA Al1aA W iriaudM h iM regoN+d ptrla and A11a1 a «repcl b cur PYnlar rerMw am apl>raaal andoaoloYtMadlaOarYtaroY~anYDSAwar 9tXanwhichmrya reposed Or the EnpMwtYp DlvYlon. 17. Special Ia11MCapA IaaAMM anal Y IIIOINIdfla AMIVW IOCk, apaCYlMl1 aw tYAM, (MarldAf- inp aidewatlu (wAh IbrlmtAal dttrlps), and YAarMYNd WtdsespMq, Is rpuYad abtq to. t.andacapinOartONrlpMbnaytlartwraQukadbairwwdwMhhtMpuOlc rgltt~a-war on iM perMMNr a drlA pmNa ana enY W otuilMatottAy nlaitaaMtAd M tM dawbpn. ~_ 15. AA waMA AMA M provided WAIT dA00raIM IleaItlMla. M bCalW h ptAAe fnWlterilanG anaA, iM WAgn Alta1 Oa oOOrdYtslAd wAh IM EfpMNNMIp DNMlotl ~,_ 18. TIN mantenaltda aAada AMA W davNapad atld attbmlllad br CAr PlatatAr ravfAw and apptogl prbr b iaatlatrCa d ~uAdh9 pafmNa. TMN CrAaM AMM atloowapa tl1s tlatllfa ylavth ataractedAttp of tM talAgad irN ApeaMA. ~_ t 7. latwttcapirlp And wrgAlbn AhaA W oatiprraa q ddnwrva want tlratgh nta prklcipNA o Xeriacaps u daNnad wt Chagar 19.1 A d ttts tAandto CunmorlpA IAulliepal Cads. 000224 Wr s..a ~ ~(~ ~9tomr~~ J_J_ JJ- JJ_ JJ. J_/ J-J_ J._/_ J__J- JJ_ JJ- ~~_ -~- SC ~ 1/91 S of III 11 ~ .2/:11 CAP .~9T~tb ' F. Stpn ~ ` _~t. TMelpfs Yrdit:alaO ontMwbminedPWroarooonoequai ony arW rotapanatlri6 approval. J_J- AnY e4rw prapoaed for INa rfevebprnem shaA comply wiM Ms Srn OrtAnaree art dull regain separate appscatbn aro approval try tM Purvtirtq Oivmbn prbrto irulaAation a any spne. _~ 2. AUnAOrm Sign ProgramlorttW devabpmenleMNba wanlneOla Cky Plantar review arW J_J- approvalprior to iaauartce d Duilalrtp psmtAe. 3. Cirecrary monument sun(s) snau bs provtlad for apartmsn, oortdomirium, or towrstomas -J~_ prbr to occupancy and ehaA regain separate appaeatbrt and approval W iM Planrtirtp Oiviebn prior to eerurtn a brrilOYlp perrrWa. G. EnvlromunW _~t. TM daveloparsnaA proviW each ProspecdW Guyer wAgrtndiwdtlu FaMh Straat ROds J-/- Crtraher prolsd n astandard smut as dNarnarlad by Uta City Prrtrw, prbrb aeaptlnp a cash depose on arty property. ~_ 2. TM dawlopsr 3haA pnvWe each proapediw buYM wralan rblke d dta CAy Adopted JJ- Spaorl 3Vdr6 Zorn la tM Red Fli Fats, b a atarrdaid lertrtat r dNarrttYNO by bM Cay PWnar, prbr b aocegirtp a wth depose on arty propMy. _~ 3. TM davelaper ebfA provide each proy7aaM boyar wraps rtolba d tM FOOdIr Freeway J_/- proract M a startdaro IormY r dNarttWnd M dp CMy Plartrw, pdor b ac+aptktp a cash OapoMl On arly property. a. A anu acouatlcal report aluM ba arrbtrrMad for CAY PWapr nvrw and approval prbr b tM JJ- Isauartce a buiiArp parrrtaa. TM Mal spat attaa Aaaus 1M pvN d kaerbr rota adanualbnlo t»bw 45CNEL.tMOWlOktq malartap and arirnaalontabhipuasprovidW. irl0 s ipproprtip, vMly tM adaplsy d dN It1NIpMbn maaatar. TM OWranO plans will W checked br coaomurroa wah ttu mltlpalbn nlaruna aanahtW N lM Mal spat. ~ i N. Otlraf AparlClr t. ErturpartryaaoeridaiyaxaranMDaprovldad inatannfareswah RaroMgrcanbrtpaFirs J-~- Protadbn Ohlrkl SlaMrda. 2. ErMrgancy aocaasaluNbaprovidM,makaallartp has anddlw,a tttWrtarmdZblaalwids J-J- at art iktlaa duraq corrablrClbn M axarEana with Rarcho Cucangrga Fin Protaclbn Olprkt nqukamartp. i ~ 3. PMr b rauYba a ttulldkq pamras hx balibtratlpa aorMnttlbrk avidaroa shall a ' - - aubrrrtlad b tip Rancho Ctksmortga Fin Praaabn Dr1rk1 that tarttporarywatar euppty lar Ike pmtaubn r avaNaCp, paniktp rprlpNtbn a nprlrad tka praaAbn fyalam. ~. rna appACara snap tmrnacl tlta U. S. Foetal Sitrvba b dNarnllrta dla approprpp type and ktntion of rtlail boaaa. MuAHlamAy raak7araial davabpnwras of WI prpvpa a aoAE ovarMad _ atnruun br mail boas stab adptrala MghlNp. itp IYtal rondos d tlp maY boar and iM dasgn d tM ovarlpad atrta]un tltaA W wbha to CAy Flamer rwrw art approval poor to IM iawarca d buiklkq pamwa. 5. For proiacta using aeplk tank lacililiaa, wrfllm tprtAfcalbn a acaplaDAAy, irlCludMlq an wpportiva ittbmulbn, anaA W ootainad Irom dta San t3arrlaNYlo County Dapanmarn of Emkompnal Hearth arq wonkttM to tM 8uildnp OdkXal prior b tin laawnn d Sepuc Tank PMlkla, and prbr b rwarlCa d W Ndklp pamtaa. Q~n~:iGJ aC • 1/91 a of 19 rt rZ A..W 2-;6 :~~ APPLICANTS 9NI1LL CONTACT THE IIUN.DINO AND SAFETY pNg10N, (71~) asa.taea, FON coaruANCE 1ArtrTI TNe FoLLOwllw coNOrtaNS: I. Sae t)«.bpm«n 1. The applknti etrA wttpywahiM meal atbgep Unibrm eailainp Coee, Uraorm McCMrM- J~- rai Cape, UnNorm PNtnibaq Ceps, NalbrtY EleUrle Cope, atq ar otMr appaca0ie copes. ortanances, and tapulalbn in Mad at tM drtN d iasuatce d rsrtlve pemils. Prase corxad the Builekq arxl Satey ONMbn tot eaOles d dw Code Apoptlon OtdMnu arW applicaoN hanpouta. z. Prfor to Iewance d Ouitdin0 pemats la a new teaidaeW drertq ungp or myor aepllion JJ- to exiakq unN(s1, tMapp Acna eMNpay dSVSbprtrm ISN at IM eaa0hhaprate. 9udt INs may incelde, 6u1 ate M WnNedb: City Besudflraatlon FN, Patk FN, DoMnde FN, systems Oh'eteprtrta FN, Pemr aM Prn CMeMhO FeM, and School Fees. ~_ 3. Prbr b iM1enC1 d hUNdtq perttra for a trw eorrenarelal ar kafralal pevebprtrra ar JJ- at101tlon to an exWkq dweloprwnL the appNCaM SMN PaY dawkpnrrs INS at iM eanoWMp tale. Such INt may ttcAlde, Oul are not IYtaled p: SyetNr OwebpnaM FN, Orainapa FN, Stbool FNe. Penh anp Pon Cheddtq Feee. _~ 4. StreN addmees duNWptovidatl dY tlr BUNdYgO111eW,aMrlracVpalCa map teeadation a11d pblb iYW11G d ~O p•Ailb• J. EaIMhrN Slrtbturaa t. Provide cortpWa:e weh tlr UMbrm &ANYp Cops for dle prODaty Nne deararx:N J~- caMi0adn0 UN, area. era MeiNgNwnaa d exMMO WNAnOa. 2. FiNUrtp WNOMIpa sIW W toads b oontpy wMh tsxna Ou10Yp araN mnYp rspdatbro br JJ- tM intendap uN a Ills aalall0 t11aN M damoMgtad. 3. Exbtlttp aewape phpaW IadrlN steal W renbva0, IEaO altdror ea0pad b COnoly wah tM JJ- UrM10rm PWriDirlp Cade and lNalorm BWtlMq Cade. e. utldagtouro orre~ u1NNYaA an b W beMad aM elbtwt on tAtNOMq p4M euOmNAaO br J~- OuilDlrtp WmM appMrtlort. K. OTadlltp -1. f3radirp d ilN MlElaci PtOPatY tllaM M h amadrbe trlNt du UrtMonn ALMdkp Cade, CAy J~- GradM10 SWMrW, and aoapte0 OladhN Drac4eas• TM Nnal gtlrq pqn Shall W wt subaanlW aaramanta wtll tTr approved P+dNq pW. 2. A eoNa raNOrl altaA ba prSpaW OY a oLWINd ertgiMer Neared W tlr StMe d CalNOmia to I J-J- pMarm aueh wak. ~, 3. T11e tlerebpnla/a Y reaatl wNhin iM soN eroabn oOArd OOlM10a1Na; a SON DW W Wnea i ~-' - PamrrreWMad.PNWOpeadSYlBernadYgCOINyyWpahAlaNdAprleuMWaa11711) ; 33T-2t111apemWrLCpAdatlon.OoaMMnrAbrtdataltpamMlahaN0aau0nWte0btMCNy ~~ prior b tM iasliartea d mApl padlnp permN. ~_ e~ A peobglcal report ahaA a prepared M a l)wwlud atgMa a t)aobOW aM eudnMW a '~ - -~ tM iNIN d appAcalton br yradirq plan cheek. ~S, ThelinalgaAlrtpplanaehaNDamnglNWandapprovedprlabMwarcadbuildkqpemtAS. ~-- Q©(9~ti6 SC ~ 1/91 70f 19 li ~ ~` N U- m~o 42-l6 p~:_,~ ~. 6. Ae a arelombt whdlvelon, the loeowirtq requiremeres shay W rtM: a. Sunry stwt»posted and an agreertwrd azscutadauarareeeinq mrrOls'tbnd all orfska -~-J- drainape acatlas rerussary ar dewatsrkq aM parcey to the sWialagbn a the Buibaq and Satery OlvNbn prbr to final map approval and prbrto the issuance d pradirq peman. b. npproprate eaasmma br sate dbpoeal d drahupe weer that ri catduaed orao JJ- or over adjacent panda, ale to a wanaated and receded b the satWadbn d Mte Buiroinq aM Satery DivYion prbr to beuartca d gradhtp and Wsdktq paman. c. On-site dravwps knprwertlants, retcaawy for tlawaterarD aM praedNq dte suOdNidad J-~- propsrtisa, are to W irmaMd pna ro iasrarce d otrad-9 pemats br aorminrctbn upon arty parcel trot may W srrhiad b dnknpa Iban riemp, Navinp, or wahin a parcel relYNe b wftioh a Ouildkrp WrrM is nquealad. d. Fvnl gradlnp p4rr for each panrl ri b W et~rtilled b a» BuYdllp and Satery JJ- lNviNon for approval prbrto laeuanud taradagand pad4p pamWe. (TNa my w on an irtuert»raal a aorrpoaae taateJ e. NI slope WrrMS n e:pu a 5 reel in veMUl rnlpnt stW w waded vMh native grasses J~- or pWaed wah pourdoaverbr amabn oorarol trponaattpMbndgrWYtpaaortn omar asamalM method d erabn oonool etaawoorrotateda tMerlManlonattw eralaMy, OIfkIN. In addebn a pemwtara Mrlptlon syaMm stn/ W provided. Tltk reW Wmri tloea rbt rNeaw iM appNcantMavebpar hom donpaattoa wsh do sbpe p4n1Yq rapuaerrnns d Sktbn 17.Ob.Q10 I d iM Davebprrnre Code. APPLMaNT SM1LL CONTKTTME ENOINEERN6 DNIlION, (7sq t1i7EQ FOR COaPLWICE Nny-t rtte FtXLOyV11Ki CONtM10NS: L oadkatlon aM VMkvnr Access t. Rghngf-way arrd eaaemanu stair (N daaceled b pM CMy for Y YMerbr prrOSC streets, JJ- eommurrey traiN, Pry P~~. pry arar, sheet heee, and PtrCMO draln.o. fadstMS as shown on fire plain arrdrar teraadve map. PrNete aararrtarse for mrrprosc ladstlu (sou-la drahapa, low NaOaraars, ale) ahY a raawvw as shown on ttn pans anNar tantatlw map. ~c 2. o.awron shah w made d IM telbwMtg rtplee-pt-w.y en>M v.mtw« afresh l J-J- (msawrW.Iim,-n~alnal c~maArnl: ~~ttoglNelon VI~NG~ AilG 1~rtotal Net an ~Y~U ~~ ~ttL . teal teat on-M.rl ~G(NtX dAlt.O ~!. teat reef on 3. AnimvocaeNonerddedlcatbnl« •ItblwlWroaOwayaaatnantshallWmaW ~ J-' for all private sineb or dMes. 4. Non-vehiarW aoaa shat W Wdcaled to tM CMy for the blowitq elnaeM: I ~ - 5. Racgrocal atzesa easements shah W govtded ettsurvlp aoaea b aM psrab M CCbRS ~~~ _ -_ or M Weds and ahaN M moorded dontaxnndy with do map a ptbr b rite bstrattoa d '. sc ~ srol ouikkq pemlAS, wMn ro map • involved. QoQa19711 Q.~~all Private tranapesassmarda for cross-bt oraaiage s1Wl De provided era shall be delineated ' a noted on iM YrW map. 7. TM fYlal map ahaY decry deYneate a t o-taet mwlimum Wilding rsatrigbn area on the rlaipl~6orlrg lot adpiwq tM zero bt line waY ane wntain Yte IoYOwnp Ian0ua0e: Wr .~,s,~.o qZ.l~ s~m~.a: -~_ J~_ •uWS MnbYQaofCare to tM Cdy a RubM Cueamerga rM rgnf ro proh0it tM consVUdbrr al (ro1iWAiaQ WibYrps /or aMraeucWrea) aathin fAOas areu dulprwfed an fha myo u 6viwinp rsambrgn area.' A maintenance 8Qre9Rlela algaaMobOralded tram each lot lotto aWawra lattaatgh rile CCBR's. ,~8. AY SZistag eaaemanb yirgwahlnfiaun rlplMq-way aflaYb WadaYrlad or deNnaatsd on 1M lalal map. _~ 9. Easarlwraa for pabdo afdelraat6 aMar atreN bees plaoe0 OlAabe dM pudic rlptaal-way sM1 a dedlcaled to the Cay wMrever dMy arleloactl arao pMraM pnlpwy. ~_ t 0. AOdYbnal atraN rlpfacf-way atoll bdaaeatad abrg dyMDan Wlw,b pbvba a minYrum a 7 feet rMatUnd from hw law a cab. Y axe adJaewa aldawaat Y wad ably tM rtpta rum 1a11a, a paraYN abaat Vas maaaarurwe aawmala et1aY b plwbed. t t. TM an'doper stall malts apoodlaahelbttb aopuaetM npt4eda11-Mepopny intereela nawaWy b corlatluq tM faQUked Pr0Y0111pbve1lMlaa, am Y flaralta alb1a01aa b do w, tM tlavelepar anu, at lust t 20 Rays prbr q submiaal p 1M tltlal map for apyloval, enter info an iQleelrlara t0 OOIION11Ifle YIp10veDMllb pwwata b COYtaeawlll Coda Saabn 88e62 at tubfltlmatltM Cb aoQWr^atlNDbDartY h1e1M11wP1Yad10rtlN bpWMMnta. Such sp^srMnl s11aN Pbtnda br PYY~a Vy tlta davabgra a1 dwY Ytctrrad M ttla Clry to acquire tM al•aaeprapelfy i1Nleala ntlllq'd bwleladbnwlMlb ataldlMawn. SaaMy for a pottbn a tlleas web sflall b h ttta arm d ^ wet dapoaY h ela amblaa pNan in an aPWalw report odalrlae Vy tM awbper, ^ oawbpera coal. Tla appraYar shall have been apprwad W tM Cry prbr b oomn1a11twwrwa a aM appraMal. M. straal anprotramares 1. AY pudk irtgwMNtlta (I1aaA0r streets, draMtapa fati111M, aomltuNy trap, Puaos. larldawpad areas, eb.~ attolm on nr pltsta atldror tenlaYre mp alwl b w11gn1Gad tc CYy Staltdvda. Inlalbr asset Yrtprovamarsa anaY sleYlda, Oul w 11a YDYIW b, aro ant: putter. AC pavettlartl, t1rWe apptoactw. aldawab, saew Yplri, and abaci toes. 2. AmmlumaZaloolwpaPwalMILwYMna~o-baeddaMdlrJladttpMol•erryahaYd wMtrudad for aY haY~solblt atreeb. 3. CoMtnrA tAa fOYVartq pNY1Mar atfeN IrIpeW11MINa Y1Cklallp, blA 110) YTYW b: 97AEEr NAad CUIm• CV17ER AC. Wary sax WAIX DRIVL APAR WFfta altar COaOt. 71WL 0{AfID ORIER f f hA' I G X ~ z JJ- ~~- JJ_ JJ_ J-/- J-J- II J-~- x • arot COd0wZ2~i $'Q'aJ 11 Gul' ~,a gYlO NdM: (a) MadW It1arM erehMaa iaMacaWrp arq Miprbn on mra/. (b) Pavamerd S r•OOrlrnlCibn arts overlays rAA W draminad W rlrp Pon check. (cl y r4 mraad, sida- wak anri w awWlaar o•r Sip. 30t. (dl n ao hwrkad, an in-Nau of eonrnwtion IN snag J~pry~'~rordss aam.(Cl K.iekT ~M/~ I~,v e ~ Melba/ I{'~ (~]ywe0D9 ni11.i r IdAI ar JrrVLW fv R hilts' r ~_ t. inprOV•rtNrd plarw and oonrluabn: a. Shell mpfOVMMIra pWw Inelydnq rfN) irNa and llraal aphis, prepared by • rapY• J-J- land Civil EnOawror, alY1 Da illernal•d b aral aPMCVad by ~ CaN Erpanar. SaaiAy shr tw pored aM an apn•msa azaoulW b als arWaabn a uia cy Enpar•r and IM Cy AnOrrry puararaaanp aonprbn a Cis pinae arldror pdvw pnr Yrpw•- C»nlti prbrb ww rr~ apprwr ama Wuarwa a ClAlenq pamYts,whkhwar ocars IkaL e. pror b any wool errlo i~wm.d in pliDle rgl+avar, la•• ah•a a gab artl a i J~- oonrruabn parrM 71WI W obLnwd hom ar Cy ErgYnMa 0aba n addawn b any Dove p•nrsls rpuind. c. Pavarrl•ra ahlpMp. rrrrkaq, trMC, atr•r runs slpslq, and Ya•roorara eondlA I J-/- a1W M Mrraaad b IM arwaabn a tl» Cy EnpYN•r• o. SgrWCaaLawiMpWlbmissanaNw•rUMeonanyhwdorlrnwtbnar•mrr6uabn J~- d myor, a•osrnary araoasctar anew wrweh NMnaawtlr oul•r mapr. ••oorlmry « coaaclor a•tiw la aAUn tank agrraY. Ara eo»a anaa a Dlae•d Cn bolo •bsa a au aMNr9laraulydadBCR, ECRaanyasgrbcrbnaappw•dOytlrGryErgin••r. Haas: J-~- ~) AM Wd eo^a anaa W No. 6 ur•w atlawwY• spaGlad M ~ Cy Ergln••r. (2) Cordua am a 7-Ydl paNarll:W ap•1 vets puMOp•. •. wrier aalr rarlq am a• awlaasd an u bur arnra a Y••ra•clbrr pa Cy J-~- ShrWrds or as Ck•aw A m• Cy Enpnr••r. I. ExlWrlp Cy rCdFr•alrYbp Corranlr~llorr anal r•nMn aprr b Mule r aN Wrr•a wah J-J- ad•pual•dabutAaNgmrrlruelbn. Aaaardorrr•p•mlRmryb• r•glr••d. Aeash MpCrl rar b• 0~'b•d b aor.r M Coal a Ra~+g and PwMq. w•acn anY a n1uMW upon mnpsllon a tlr eorlalnrcll•rr b MI• •alY4Clbrr a ltra Cy EnpYw•r• p. CorlerrYataaldraMrap•gowaanaarblu•asb•waM•. lNld•ratlawalldrakr aNa W J~- irWal•d b Cy Slarrdards, •raq br anlpl• lamy bq. h. Handicap aoww rang d•agn snY D• ar ap•rall•d M M• Clly Enpar••r. J-J- i. SU•MrartMSthYWapprovdhylMCyPlwrrprlorbsvOm11Y1M1kgDWCh•ck. J--- S. SV•r MrgrOV•m•r pWs par Cy SWrdrW brY prMap aln•Ia ants W p1o~MIW br rwi•w arts approvr Dy IM Cy EnpYr•w. Prbr b any wak b•Yq p•rbmr•0 on dr• pd• ~r• an••a, r«a arras a geld am aorraauabn p•mlMa ants i» ogwr•d hem dl• cuy Ergn••ra Olik• n addabn b arty otrNr p•miM• rprN•d. s. sh••l lr••a, a mNrimrm a 1SgaMorl al:• a wpar, anaA oa nMail•d per Cy starWarda in aooordarrC• wen IIN Cay! pr••1 trN program. 000229 J~ ~ J- x ~i•I born h .~'p'n X 7. Ilaaraedbn la» d silo d.aion ,nap t» reviewed 6y are City Engineer for pDdomNnte wsh atlopfa0 poaq. a On maacbr a W9ar atroata, 9nes d sipttt strap a pbltsd for all Drolau Wersedion. arcardar0 drhewaya. WaM, spn. and sbpes shwa be located oWSide die lines of siWa. UrWxaWrrO and dn.r oeetrudbns waNn tM anss d sgfs snWl a appovad oY tru Cay Errpineer. D. fatal reaidedlal steel iraenectiorra atua Mve tMa nollpabaay krOrovW, usually DY movirplM 2+/•cbeealatreeltraaa On sacnllde awaylromtMStroe1 and Waeed'm asueet tree sasemenl. ..~~ 6. A Penral be ogaared Iran CALTRANS for anY wtrrk waM tM 1Nbwlnp rgMOl•way: %ll ~tri.. •_• 9. M Rroac aryaovartpnla M dta baowlnp aifN11 W W Oe oparatlaraay aonpMla prior to tM iserrarra d buadlrq pemab: N. Rlat aYNMnalloa Anus 1. A sepanle ael d lardetape ir10 hlgalbn Wan paf EgtUaMq PuoaC Woks Stardarda straa 6a aubnahe0 ro ata CMY FJtpYwar ar ravWr and approval pda b IaW map approval a 4awrcy d oundap pamrl4, wNCMvar arxvn ihrt TM baowarp kWSeapa parkways, rrrewans, paasoa, saaamartta, haaa, a d)w arar an rgiad ro W araNaad ado tM Lardacapa Maaaarrartca DYVIty: V~1 v J J~_ J_J_ J~_ JJ_ J-/- J_l J-l_ ~2. ASiplrW rbnsera and walverbmrropN altNOrbmrtlw applapdab Urldaoapa and lgMhq Distrkda afuN W flNdadal tM City Errpatpr pdabtagimapapplovalOr 4suarrcadhuildrrp parmih wfadrwar ocaaa hal. ForrrtMbn taM alWl hs Aonr M dw davaMpar. 3. AarpyirW puoac lardaCapagandkllpafWnayMams alrabrznaarowy rnaaaaard CytM developer uraN aonptad by dla Cay. ~_ t. PaMwq Wdsapatp Oo fM krlbrWp meepa) tNY omform b Ole reams d ttte reeparsNa Baldalealbn Maalar Plan: _ O. Oralfrape an0 Fbod OOIIUOI 7. The Dbiad (a Patbrr dtweW) b IoaNd waNn a FlodO Harald Zorn: dteralon, Ibod pmtecderr maaauM snaa M provda0 tl artaNd M a npltaan0 CMA Eltplnaer and apgova0 Oy tlN CMy EnpaNer. 2. n snM Oe tM davabpera rettporolDily ro nave tM cunara FlRM Zone desipnMbn rMbvrld Iran IIM pmNct ana. TM tlevNSpara anpknar a1Ma pnpan as dnM+~wbaon ICLOMFI aMM W~ oMa~ Whom FEM. A ContlMbnal Lahr prior b hrlal map apprwal a iawarrn d builtlkq permlla, wfllcMvar aaaaa tM. A latla d Map RavYbn (CONK) shall W blued by FEMA prbr b ooplpara,Y a irrpo'yarnara aooapartea, wnkMvN oaura tint. 3. A final drainage ahrdy ahaa be aubnwlad b and approved Dy dre CNy Ertpklaer prbr ro final map approval or tM bwana d ouildrrq perrlala, whfCMve/ amrn anl. All drainage lacr4lin snaN M arotawd as rpuind by IM Cay Errpalaar. JJ- J-~- J-J- J~- O©030 x • argil a one u ~~~~ tr t. A pemat Imm the ccuray Food Cornrol Dlstrkt b rspuired for wont wahin rts rgrnol-way. wr rA,.~.a a2-i~ s~mm>avt 5. Treece ire prdaDaed wahil 5 feet of die aubide dartrelx of arty pubic storm grain pps IJ~ meawrW hom lM autx sdpe d a mature tree tnnac JJ- B. Rldk storm drain eaeenunts ehaa W graded b cornet ovedbwe in tM event d a JJ- bbrkape in a wmp catch Dash on the pubac etreN. P. Ut11aNa ~_ t. Provitla separate uli4ly aervius to each parch NKlydkq sanaary sewerage syelxn, wbx. J-J- pas. ebr.Yricpower, tsMpllorre, and eeDM N (M unarpwrb) h aooordrlce wim tM tltllry Standards. Eesxnsnts slue tts provWW n rspcried. -~ 2. The devebper sheN W nsporreihM IOr tM relOCallon d exs1Yq utatlee a Mpeaary. JJ- 3. Walx and awvx daro shad tte deelpred arb mrpln¢hd b nNel tM regtlkxtlNaa d llw JJ- Cueanrorrpa Counts Walx OMMCt (CCYOD), Rancho Cucumr4a Fin PtoteOkrr Dlwtct, ana fire Ernimmunlal HeMh Deprbtrra d lM Caaay d San BertratdYn. A feller d oorrgW nu Iron IM CCWD is reglared prbrb IMW trr~ agsovsl a Ywrarcw d pemYlt, wtaeMwr ooaus fist. a Carwal Regpkanranu card ADpla1W ~_1.TM eaparale paroelaodaaYNO wiINn tM pto(sct botardatMS anMfla laOMYCOrtEired YMO JJ- one parcel prbr to latuarra d anWMp pamNa 2. M eaumxa br a ioia we OAweraY afraN W Oro`/ldad Drier b Mal map appoval d I JJ- iawarra d buadirp pemrlb, wraclrar~w Donee INM, br: 9. Prior to appoval d tM ftnM map a oapoaa stall W Poatad wArr tM CMy aovxNp tlra I JJ- sstinaled and d appatbrarp tla aaaawitam caber Aaaeaanart DNtrb among IM rrawy aaaad pareab, 1. Eflwarbar3an SeNN'Y Ma Rayarl Maiitlta, 9aarbaty RpIpW. am MaeMr Pan I JJ- DrainapeFansfraaWpabprlorbtYalmaptppovalaptbrbOUYbtppormaiawarru M rb nlrJ H irrOerad. 5. Pemtb stral a ogailw hom rite blowNq apaatcfn for wodr wfgrln Oat rgMal-way: I J_J_ 8. A sipnw odrxs Yrd walwr form b ~ andrar brm fits fart Ersaartwtt Corrtnturlay I JJ- Fadaln OMYIq 1na1 M flied wMn 1M City EttpMraar prbr b tiW mp appbval or IIa aauatw d euadalp permb, wtlktawr ootaas hs1. Fotmspon oats ahsa W Dona Dy its Oweloper. 7. Prior b flnaaaatbn d any rlavaloptrara phue, sufnWta Yrplovantara pWa stall W tom- -.' pNled Beyond tM pfafe tlourbarNS a aswn tacdbry aowa aro OrYnpa prdagbn b IM salaaabrr d Mrs Clry EnpYaar. Ptap goutbsriss Ylal oonaspdb b bt Mrat mown on tM appovad tanWtva map. 0()n:J~ sC•1/el 17 of 11 11 h~~ll RESOLVTION NO. 92-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA. CALIFORNIAr DEN%ING, WITHOUT PRESUDICE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-18 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER CONS ISm I:7G OF A 75,000 SQUARE FOOT GROCERY STGRE, TWO SATELLITE BV ILDINGS OF 3,500 SQUARE FEET EACN, AND A DRIVE-THRU PAD OF 4,800 SQUARE FEET ON 10.6 ACRES OF LAND SN THB COMMUNITY COMMEACI AL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTN ILL BOULEVAND SPECIFIC PLANT LOCATED AT THE NORTNWEST CORNEA OP FOOTHILL BOVLEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOP - APN: 207-102 -03, Sr Er 15, 20, 71r ANO 49. A. Recitals (i) Smith'a Pood b Drug hoe filed en application for the iouance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-18 ea deaeribsd in the Citle of thin Reeo lul ion. Hereinafter in this Reaolut ion, the eubjeet Conditional Use Permit tequeei ie referred [n ae ^the application.• (ii; On the 9th day of Dacembsr 3992, the Planning CommLSaion of the City of Rancho cucamonge conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded acid hearing on that date. (iii) At tM conclusion of the above-noted public hoar ingr the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for approval by the Commie ion on December 15, 1992. (iv) All legal prerequie ita• prior to the adapt ion of ehls Puolut ion have Occurred. B NON, THEREFORE, it 1• hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning CommL•ion of tN City of Rancho Cucamonga a• follows: 1. Thl• Commiuion hereby epecitically finch that all of the facts Bet forth Ln Lhf RfcitaL, ParC A, of this 0.esolut ion are trw and correct. 7. eased upon su batantial av idmw prf unbd to thL Commtu ion during the ebovrreffrencad public hearing on December 9, end continued Co DecembeY 15, 3997, including written end oYel staff reports, iogsChar with public testimony, th if Commission hereby speci[ically finds e• Collowr. (a) TM applLCat ion applies to property loce[ed et the northwest cornfc of Foothill Boulward and Vinfyacd Avenue with a arrest frontage of 770 [Bet along Foothill sou Lvard and a loC depth of 780 fut. The propoad sift is campoud of several pacefl• and L^ pnunt ly improved with a vac aced roller rink end restaurant, a [nrstandinq vacated restaurant and associated parking lot with landseaplnq, anQ a one-story, wood-framed nsidfncs; end ^©f IzJ2i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-151 CUP 92-18 DENTAL - SMITH'S December 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject •ite are partially vacant and developed with two apartment bu ildings, the property to the south eonsiat• of vscan[ property south of Foothill Boulevard, the property to the east ie Commercial ea e! of Vineyard Avenue, and the property to the weal ie the Cucamonga Channel; and (c) The application contemplates thv devalopmsnt of a ]5,000 square Eoot grocery stare, two satellite buildings (B 6 C) compriaad of 3,500 square fast sash, and a drive-thru pad cons Lting of 4,800 squ ara fact; and (d) The appllestlon, as proposatl, would be detrimental to the publ ie health, safety, and welfare and doe not comply with each of the applicebls provisions of the Oevelopunt Coda and [ha Foothill Boulevard 5pscif is Plan for the following rsaaons: (1) The arehitseture end relatd duign element within the proposed project, as reflected in thin application, eta no! consistnt with the goal, pollclu, and design guidelines Of Chs Poothill Boulevard Specific plan which states LM LOllowlnq: 1) In Section 0.5.1, thst vehicular Craf tic through adjacent nsitlentlal arrest shall be mLnlmlzsdp 2) In Section B.2.2, that Activity center perking lob dominating the street scene are specif ieally prohibited and auto-related facll itlu (i.•., wrklnq bays, s[orage, etc. ) shall be •crwned oc orisntd way from public viws, buildings shall be cited and designed to minimize pedestrian/vMicle eonfllct• and avoid locating drivswsys and service areas which interfere with the flow of Foothill Bou Lvard pedestrian movement; 3) In Section 8.2.5, Chat in Activity cantor locations the parking areas shall be located io the rur of build inga; and 0) In Section 9.6.3, that parking lots between the [root property line and major structures ere strongly discouraged. (2) The design of the Smlth~s store, a• proposed, provides loading dock Eacll itiu on the east and west •ide^ of the store which tees Paothill Boulward end are, tMatore, inconsistent with the duign of otMr major supetmarkau in Rancho Cucamonga which [root onto major thoroughfares. The location and orientation o[ loading facilitiu are typically provided along the roar elevations o[ grocery store end/or shopping center co corral deltvery activity fnSEe publLc view, particulsrly in en are which i• considered to W a major gabway into the wasbrn section of the City. (3) The location o[ ohs loading docb crate potentially dangerous vshleular coot 11th between Crack and ter cu[[ic within the parking lot. In add Ltlon, ouch • pobnt lolly 4angerou• and contuslnq ersttlc pattern within the parking lot sou Ld De hazardous to pedutrlan• entering and citing the store. (4) Truck traffic along San Bernardino Road and truck ingru^/egcsn tree and to thL street which Ls proposed by the project site du Lgn, Se undulnbU to szirt lnq rnldenen along both •Ldu of the strut. 00i?~33 PLANNING COMMISSION RE$DLDTION NO. 92-151 CUP 92-18 DENIAL - SMITH'S December 15, 1992 Pegs 3 3. Baaad upon the suhstantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-rafsranced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facto set Eorih in petagtaphe 1 and 2 above, this Commies ion hereby finds end concludes as follows: (a) That the proposes use U not in accord with the General Plan, Lhe object Luse o£ the Developnent Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That LM proposed use, together vita the Condit Lone applicable therator will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or uelfars or msterially injurious co properties of improvements in the vicinity. (c) Thet the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Bouleva[d Specific Plan. 0. Based upon CM findings and conclusions set torts in paragraphs 1, 2, 'and 3 nDOVe, this Commission hereby denies, without prejudice, the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of thL Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TXIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1992. PLANNING CO! SIGN OP TNS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ~` T. McNiel, Chairman I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City o[ Aaneho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wu duly and regularly int[otlueed, peseed, and adapted Dy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commie ion held an tM 15th day of December 1992, by Che fallowing vote-to-wli: AYE9: COMMIS9IONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE N069: COMNIS9IONER9: MELCHBR AB9ENT: COMMSSSIONER9: NONE 000234 Nr. Buller agreetl it would be appropriate to remove all portions of the wa)1 in that area because of the condition of ehe number of Lots in the area. ~ -, Chairman. MCNiel questioned if the City r,~wne Lot C from the adjoining a4act. i' Mr. Buller at ated the City does own the land and will quit qla im it to the lore being created with the subtlivieion. „~ Chairman McNiel questioned the die posit ion of the area marked natural at the soot hern portion of Lot 19. Hr. Coleman noted that Engineering Condition 5 rdquirea the developer to make a good faith effort to offer iG to the owner Af Lot 44 to the we et because of the ditfetsnce in grade from the. remainder o`f Lot 19. ~` Chairman MeN isl observed that the motioh had bean made and seconded to issue a Negative Oeclarat ion and adopt the fasolut ion approving Tentative Tract 14116 with modification tc combine driWways af`two of the lots at the end of Santa Clara Court. Hat ion carried py the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:*' CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERA: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~-carried Chairman MCN ielf.moted that the eppeal pruceae was available to the reeidenta of the commuyty. Ha stated that an alternative of working with the developer would oleo a available. Planning Commission recessed from 8:56 p.m. to 9:10 p.m. '~ I. ENVIRONMENTIL ASSESSMlNT ND CONDITION T~ ~* ocewtm oo-:A - gMITH'S - The development of a commercial ahoppinq canter conaieting of a 75,000 square foot grocery atom, two satellite bu ild inga of 3,500 square Eeat each, and a drive-thru pad of d,800 square [see on 10.6 acraa of land in the community Commereiel Olser ict (Subarea 2) of ens Foothill eoulevard Specific Plan, located at CM northwest corner of FcothLll Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-03, 5, Br 35, 20, 21, and 49. Staff recommends issuance of a mit i9atad Negative Declaration. Beverly Nieun, Aaeocieu Plennar, preaenta0 the staff report. Brad eullar, City Plennar, noted that the City had received letters from ad}oin ing property owners expreeaing theLr concerns end those letters ware In front of the Commlu ionars. commissioner Tol atoy aakad if any lines of might had been praperr•d to show the view of ehe truck loading and shopping cart areas [rom Foothill Boulevard. Planning Commission Mlnutss -13- December 9, 1992 oon~ h ; b ~ t ~ ~ ,p „ Me. Nie een stated there had been sketches of the areas but they were as viewed from the Bite, not from Foothill Boulevard. Commissioner Tolstoy asketl if there were any provisions for recessing any vending machines which may be placed in front of the store. Hs. Nissen responded that the applicant had agreetl to recess any vending machines but a Gonda ion had not been added. Chairman McNiel opened the public heating Larry Rlang, Sm ith'e Food 6 Orug Center, 1418 Thomas Piac a, Fo tt Worth, Texas, stated their facilit lee are combination supermarket and drug stores. He et atad they had surveyed the erase area ana selected the site as being the best location. He indicated tney had purchased six parcels of land which represented a substantial investment in the community. He etatetl they had been in the entitlement proc esa Ear IS months and he felt their project would clean up a blighted entrance into the City. He requested that the application ba approved because they were anxious to proceed but they were concerned regarding some of the conditions. He said their architect antl engineer were present and would ask specific questions about the Condit Iona. Commies io net Me Lcher observed the Commission had received four lette ra from property owners on San Bernardino Road intl ie at Lng that Sm it h'e had been in escrow at one time but had since decided not to purcnase those properties. He requested that Mr. Mlang give some input on the metier. Mr. i(lang stated that at one time chose three pr ope rt lea had been under contract and Sm it h'e had pat up a substantial amount of earnest money, but Smith's decided to forfeit the earnest money because they did not feel they could get effective use from that much land in the development and meet the City's and Smith's requirements. He said they could not qet enough building area in the total prcject to just iEy the ourchaea of those atld itional propert lee. He said they had therefore decided to scale down the project. Prescott Hu ir, Preec otC Muir Architects, 1744 Berkeley Street, Senta Monies, thanked staff Eec working with them during the Design Review proceae. He Eelt considerable changes had been made and the prcject had been cone iderably improved by the pro<ees. He remarked that when they originally submitted the project they used a generic store airs of 75,000 equate feet, out the actual footprint of the store had been reduced co 71,420 squ ara Eeet with mezzanine apace producing a 79,551 square Eoot store. He stated that Smieh'e does not anticipate locating vending mach loco in front of the store, but they would be waling to enclose any machines if they should decide to add them in the future. Ne etatetl plane for such architecturally treated enclosures could be provided prior to pulling building permits. He showed chair proposed grey concrete file [o be used in place of the originally proposed teal color. He proposed that the blue-g teen paint finish be used nn the window mullions and the glazing tint also be bls e-green, but said they would cone ider changirq iE the Commies ion felt thet would be Lnappcopriats. Hs said they had some concerns with conditions ae outlined in the propo aatl rasolut ion. He said they would like to move Che pzo7ect forward and did not want Che concerns to be an Planning Commies ion Minut ee -14- December 9, 1992 l!0,, /n.U V impediment to the process. He requestetl that the uniform Sign Progtam approval not be required prior to issuance of building permits, but rather prior to issuance of a Celt if irate of Occupancy. He observed that in their experience CalTrana is very slow in project review and he requested that Planning Division Conditions No. 14 and 15 be changed to require Ca lTranv drainage acceptance and elope drainage acceptance prior to Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of grading permits. He remarked that the cedar tr¢v they wore being required to relocate under Planning Condition No. 2E would coat beCween 530,000-540,000 and there would be a chance the tree would not survive. He observed that 540,000 would buy a lot of new trees and he felt it would De more reaeonab le to increase other lender ap ing in lieu of attempting to relocate the true, He Eelt they should not be requ i[ed to construct the 3z feet of pavement on the south aide of the Foothill Boulevard median and asked that the condition be changed to indicate construct ion would be that which ie required by CalTrsns. He noted that Engineering Condition No. 2d stated the developer may [squest a ze imbureement aq[eemenC but there was no guarantee the request would be honored. Mr, Mu it requested that Eng Lneerinq Condition No. 4 be changed to state that they would make a good faith effort to negotinta with property owners to gain rights of way Dut would expect the City to offer the rights of eminent domain to proceed with condemnation if an agreement could hat by rear had. HB noted they we ra being asked to [hare in in-lieu fee[ antl reimbursement fees in previous and yet-to- be-built improvement a, and he did not feel that surrounding propartiee were being asked to parC tripe[[ in deferment of coats where Smith's was making the improvement e, ouch as in curb and gutter and rlght-of-way improvemenU. Hs questioned why they would need to qo beyond Cucamonga Creek to underground utility poles and felt undergrcunding should 6e limited Co the project side of the creek. Hs felt it should by cond iC toned upon the avellability of existing eonduit• in the bridge which could accommodate the bearing of the atilt[ ten ae ha thought the coat of extending ut ilitiu through ehv existing bridge would ba excessive. Hs stated Chat where Smit h'a is being aekad to pay for prsv lout improvement a, they would expect wbeequent developer[ to share in the cost of improvements being mods in Ghe public right of way. Xa requested eliminat lon of Engineering Condition No. 6 beceuee by felt they should not have to contribute in-lieu Eeae for improvements where they will be reconetruet ing previous improvement ^. Mr. Mutr stated their intone in making the imptovement• to Sen He[na[tlino Road was to accommodate truck Cra Ef is eo they could route delivery trucks to the center via San Bernardino Roetl. Ne objected to Eng inesring Cond it icn No. 9 setting a 3-ton Ilmit on the road and Ea It the limit should be Htabl Lhed based on tM actual [ruck lcade they intend to impose on the arrest. Hs requesced that approval[ from the San Barnard ino County Health, Cucamonga County water District, and school dietricte be required prior to Certificate of occupancy rather than prior to ieeuance of build ing permits. Ha stated they were not trying to avoid compliance with Condit tone, but merely trying to expedite grnd ing antl construct ion. He observed their landscape architect and civil enq ineer were available to answer questions. Calvin Reed, 73a Santa Victoria, Solana Beach, stated he ie a part owner of the apartment but Ltling at EBa3 Sen Bernardino Road. He observed Ghat he had submitted a letter to ens CommU•ion requesting chst Smith•• devQop the entire area as a singU project. Ne felt the changed use would make It Planning Commission Minutes -15- December 9, 1993 QGf?~3'7 difficult to refinance or sell the apartmene building. He request etl that the City work with smith's to make the project work on the ens ire cornet of land. He noted that Nr. Hlang had mentionetl that it seemetl impossible to mesa the City's requirements and still include those parcels. He Eelt the development woultl De nicer looking without the aging apartment buildings overlooking the center. Richard Re ichelt, 1846 North Vallejo Way, Oplantl, stated he is pars owner of [he apartment building at 8563 San Bernardino Roed. He provided pictures of the development on eha east side of vineyard and the apartment building e. He noted chat he had submitted a Letter dated December 2, 1992, and ae ked if th ac woultl be part of the record. Chairman NcNiel aseu red him it woultl be part of the record. Mr. Reiehalt et at ed Chet in June 1990 they had been contacted by Sm Lt h'e agent regarding sale of their property. He said a price was established and they agreed to sell. No said no fort her negotiations had taken place and Smith's had never contacted them regarding any problems with pricing. Ha Eelt development by one owner would bs a 6ensf it tc the City, smith's, and the taxpayers. He said they wars Lneraduced to the Foothill Boulevard Spec if is Plsn in 1990. Ns thought the Foothill Boulevard SpecLfic Plen intends that l single party develop the entire corner antler a master plnn. He •aid Smic h'e had new constricted the plan to allow thsmaslve• Chs pr iv ilege of a prams devdopmsnt spot with the concurrence of the City Planning Commis don which will leave a blighted arse for the City with limited future tlavslopment. Ha said the rsmnent parcel wa• being picturstl for Puturs dsvs lopmsnt with Gwo bu ildi nqa and a parking Lot but he Ee It it would not be possible to develop with two 2,000 square foot buildings and make n profit. Xe felt the blighted arse would remain unlas• it ie condemned, torn down, or burned. He al eo felt the increasatl tra [f is end limited parking on son sarnerdino Road woultl be a constraint Eor the apartment Duiltlings. Ne did nor Eeel the remaining parcel• are economically developable paresla singly. Xs said it the three remnant parcel• ware conso; ;dated, it would mean they woultl need to meet new development requinment• including possibly looking for Intl ion bones and a poet o[f ice and paying for a street lightr curbs, etc. Hs did not feel a small investor could afford ihoee contlitions. Xe obwrved that tenant• ere leavlnq she apartment bu lidlnq and ne felt that Smith's currenC plan would cause him severe flnenclsl losses. Ha stated the Foothill 0ou levard spseif Lc Plan calla [or a min lmum parcel of two acres, 200 fast wide and 195 feat deep. Hs said the combined frontage of the two apartment hou ee• only equals 140 feat and woultl not meat the two-acre minimum. Hs felt the remaining parcels would bs a small extra expense [or Smith's to absorb and would make a better project. Ns noted that hs nod talked with the Planning Div is lon and envy had emphasized the fact chat tna city cannot force emit h'e to purchase their property. He stated that he admired Smitn'a for their oriq inel proposal, but Re was now concerned about the rosidue left for Rancho cucemonge. Na quotioned if Smith's propassl follows the Paothiil Boulward Specific Plan. Hs nmarketl that hie tenant• would nsve to view an unplanned rear view of the dwelopmsnt with a steep embankment and no block wall. Hs [ssred iN chl ldrsn from tN apartment house could fall down the embankment. Planning Commiulon Minutes -16- ^ecember 9, 1992 OQ~~38 Hazie Aeichelt, 1866 North Vallejo Way, Vplantl, pact owner of the 8863 San Bernardino Aoad apartment building, stated they hatl lost tenants who had Deen there Eot seven years because they feared trucks would be using San Bernardino Road and they did not wish to live there because they had children. She asked that the City do whatever could be tlone to have her property pure ha eed or condemned. Patricia Mejia, 409 South Daleaford Drive, La Puente, part owner of the apartment building at 8851 son Bernardino Road, noted that the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan calls for a minimum of 2 acres, 200 feet wide artd 175 feet deep, for Community Convnercial development. She noted that the plan also calla for internal circa lotion patterns to direct reef Eic away from surrounding residential neighbothootle. she felt [heir property would be negatively impacted by the smith's driveway. she remarked her father had nod a stress attack becauee of the problems aeecciated with the proposed Smith's development. she et at rd they had loot tenants beeau sa of the dove lopmeni. Ed Comb •, 417 North Central Avenue, Vplantl, owner of 8000 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, noted he had provided a Eour-page letter. He felt the tlevelapment of smlth'r will De a great asset to the City. He saitl ha had been apptoachetl in 1990 to sell the parcel and he informed Smith's that he had an approved project and had pulled bu ild inq perm ire and paid ae soclatrd Eras. Hr said he rejected the offer and wee informed by Smith's that unless they were able to t.ie up the Mej is and Reiehelt property as well ae hie, Ghey would walk from the project end choose another site. He said Smith agreed to purchase hie property at a fair and reaeonaDle price and he felt that the beet thing to do for both himself and the City would be to integrate his parcel into the Smith's project. He then remarked that if the Smith's project were approved ae submitted, he wanted io get hie previous ly approved, but now expired, project underway again, but he did not see how it could work becauee the dif Ee re nee in elevation Erom the aceee• to Vlney artl to hie property ie 16-18 feet. Chairman NcNiel questioned why Mr. Combo had allowed nia permits to azpire. Mr. Combo responded that he had mot wish Ciiy Manager lack Lam, and even though the city hatl extended the permits ae long as legally possible, the permits expired earlier this year. He said he had been under conezeci to 5m ith'e at the time, so hr could not ee 11, encumber, lease, or refinance the property. Mr said Lnat a• of Eivr days before the escrow wa• to close, Mr. Kiang hoe indicated he did not know it they were going to buy the property. Raul Me}ia, 409 South Dalartord Drivs, La Puente, stated he ie pact owner of the apartment build inq at 8851 San Bernardino Road, Rancho Cucamonga. He said he hoe been under a Lot of stress and had been doing well until Smith's approached him to sell hie prope:t y. He noted they had negotiated and smith's had agreed to hie pricing. He ae id Lhai after opening escrow, hie tenants moved or stopped paying rant after hearing about the Smith's development. Ha ea id hr had a hard time re-rene inq unite becauee he had to tell prospective tenants that eha building war in escrow and would be torn down. He said hie property ie br inq destroyed end hr cannot afford to keep rebuilding. Hs observed that Sm ith'• nod never contacted him to renagot late the price, but Lnetead just pu lLed out of escrow. He hoped someeh ing could be worketl out so Planning Commission Minute -17- December 9, 199Y Qocz3s ChaC Smith's would buy hie property because Re feared hie parcel ie too small for any other dwelopment. Chairman HeNiel questioned Mr. Mej ia'a vacancy rate. Mr. Mejia stated that currently all four apartments are filled but two tenants may move by the end of the month berauae of the situation. He said ha Rad typically had all four units rented; but since the property had entered escrow he had experienced people moving in and out and not paying rant. Chairman McNiel noted that part of the problem may ba the general economy. Bill Hartag, 8837 San Bernardino Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated ha Lives on Cho northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue, across the strut. Me felt abet if LM Smith'• project iv approved witROUt the three pnrceL, the corner lot immediately sereu free him would De zoned for a convenience market and he did not want to live acroa• the strut from a small market. Ne objected to [rusks acing San Bernardino Road 2a hours a day. He stated he did not want to pay for Lmprovement• to San Bernardino Road. Chairman McNLal asked if Mr. Nlang or Hr. Muir would like [o addreu tM public eosmsnte. Both Mr. Rlanq and Mr. Muir reepondetl negat ively. Nearing no further Uet imony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He caked if the Smith • project meets the raga itemut• of iha Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Mr. Buller orated that in ataft'e opinion eha project ie in full compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specif Lc Plan as related to master planning of the area. He said that acme of the adjolnLng property owner! had alluded that the Foothill Boulevard SpeciELC Plan required the entire property from San Bernardino down to Foothill Bou LVard W developed a^ one unit at one tiu and that wa• not Lrue. He noted coat • good example wss the approval of Mr. Combo property, at whleh alma Mr. Combo wu asked to provide • master plan to •how that tM adjoining property could 6e developed harmoniously in the Euture. He noted that she master plan trom Smlth'• did not preclude dwelopmut of the property to the north. Chal rmen McNiel !eked tM City Attorney io •laDOraG on the City's limitations or abilitiu to require Smlt h'a to include the Chru remnant percale. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Clty Attorney, eLaGd the Clty bake at plans which an eubmitua to sea Lt tM plan meets tM nods, recommendat tone, and expectat ion• Lor tM aru. He indicated there would De euf Eicient greund^ Eor denial ie tRS site plan Ls not approprlau for she propowd dwelopesnt. He aid Ln thi• eau cM City wa^ being eked by adjoining property owner to look at sdjacant property which 1• nos betars the Commluion. Ns staUd tM City wa^ Deinq eked to remedy a [ailed buslnns dnl by lne lading • Condit eon of approval which would Eoree ergo islt ion of eddlt tonal property anO the City cannot do that. Na ^aid !AS City must look K the site plan end not consider Planning Commiuien Minutes -18- December 9, 1992 C~Q024U property valuations or negot istione which may have occurred and iha City could not resolve Lssuie be[ween private pertiea. Ha observed that a eondltion of approval requiring purchase of Chi adjoining ptopsrtiu would not be valid becaue the Cosmiaeion moat determine only if the pneentad tin plan L• adequate. He said it the site plan as presented is inappropriate because of the lack of those properties, then it would be appropriate for the Commission to deny Chi project, but iha City muse dial with the project ae patented to sae Lf LC ie valid. Chairman McNisl anksd if the testimony presented was more of a civil matter. Mr. Nanson mated that would possibly 6s true dependant upon ihs contractual ngrsaments. Chapman McNiel as kid that staff roipond to Mt. Haitag'• quutlon about thi poniDility of being apisae0 for improvements made [o San sernardino Road. Dan Jamie, Senior Civil Snginser, observed that if Mr. Hartaq develops in the furors, he would have to reimburse smith's Eor puDllc improvements along his frontage. Chairmen McNisl nuggestsd the Commission a[tunpt to gat staff's input on iha quutione zaLed by iha applicant. Mr. Buller noted that a majority of questions raised by cha applicant ere a mater of policy and wgguted chat the chairman review the conditions in question with the full CommLSSlon. Chairman McNLel noted one request was to have the unitoa sign program approved prior to CM iuuancs of a cart if scats o[ occupancy rather than prior to the iuuancs of bus Ldinq permits. He recalled Chet [oars had Dann problue on other projec[o in those instances where the adoption of the unitorm sign program had bean delayed. commiuionsr Chitiea agrad it would 6s ineonststent to delay adoption of the uniform sign program. Mr. Buller felt that a •Lqn program for this center would not be cliff Lcult bscauu then is only one uin building and three [utun pad Du tidings. Chairman NcNiel asked for Snglneerinq Division'^ input regsrd lnq Planning Cored it tons No. 14 and 15 requiring CalTrane approval for drs lnage acnptance and iha slope drainage acceptance letter prior to issuance of gradln9 permits. Mr. Jams[ noted that the Bu ild inq and Safety Division would not aign otf on the plans without nn approval from CelTrana. Nr. Buller said soft would not recommend any change to thou conditions. Chairman MCNlel agreed there shoo ld be no changes. CamaL•sonar Tolatoy agrud that than could be a lot of problue !f tM City allowed grading co begin prLOr to CelTrana approval. Planning CommLalon N1nuGS -19- December 9, 1993 000241 Chairman McN ial noted there had been a question rained regard inq rep lent inq th0 radar tree. Mr. Buller said the Commieeion had diecret icnary action to allow the applicant to improve the quantity or size of other vegetation on the property in lieu o[ relocating that particular tree. Crmmiuicnsr Chitin asked toe sge and oiza of the tree. Commissioner Toletoy felt it would be better to enhance the remainder of the landscape plan because the tree msy not survive if it is mound. Me. Nieesn et eted'the tree is 60 feat tell and 30 feat wide with a 64-inch trunk circumference. She stated tM arDOt iet'• report etab• the tray i• healthy with a 75 percent chance of survival. tic. Bu11eY auggaeied Smith'• m:y uieh to look et donating the tree it it was found accaptaDla to remove the tree from the sib. Coemiuioner Nelchaz noted that the applleani was not resisting relocating any of the other cru• and ha felt the chances of loss should be caneidared. Xa agreed with Commie toner Tolstoy. Chairman McNiel agreed. Hs noted Chet the applicant had also oD)ecbtl to constructing 32 tact of Pavement an CM south •ide of Poothill Bon LVard and had requuted that ehs eondit ion De changed to require construction would be as required Dy CalTrans. Mr. James noted that the construcCLOn sequLremsnL wu lisbd as Daing subject to mod if icstion and approval by CnlTrane. He said that, Dated on experience, staff felt J2 feat would De the calTrana rage irement. Chairmen M<Niel noted the developer Dad a question regarding Engineering Condition 2d. Mr. Buller etabd the dawloper's quutlan had Daan wRether ehs city could honor a zeimbursemant agreement nquast. Mr. lames stsbd Enginutinq would ogre to that coquet. He said Eng ineerlnq has not denied any such cequut• for permanent improvements which Dave bun installed. chairman McNiel remarked the developer also had concerns about Engineering Condition No. 4. Mr. ,Tama stated that Enq inuring Condition No. 4 desk with the pouiDl• need to acquire right-ot-way on the southwest Cosner Lor the Vineyard Bou lavard transit Loninq. He nobd that Standard condition No. ill provides for tM developer to •nCer into an agreement with toe Clty to campleu the improvements [o llowinq the Clty'• acqu Lett ion of the land Lf CM daveloper'• good talth dlort• to acquire the land should tall. Plannln9 CommU•Lan Minute -20- Becembar 9, 1992 000242 Chnirean McNiel observed the[ Mr. Heir Dad questioned the requiromenta on undergroundinq. Mr. Buller noted that the applicant had requested that Engineering Contlition No. 9ai be changed to require und¢rgrounding only if there Le ex iat ing conduit in the bridge beeausa he was coneern¢d with the poientisl expense of undergtounding across the channel if the conduit dose not exist. Commissioner Toletoy asked if thaC would mean conduit under the bridge. Mt. Buller said it could also mean along the aide of the bridge. He said the commission had not addressed ouch a situation in Lhe pact. 5hintu Bose, Deputy Ciiy Engineers etaied the applicant would be able to hang some conduit on the side of the bridge. CommiuSOnei Melc her requested clarification that eherv was no [houghs UaL the underground ing would need to go under the channel. Mr. Bos¢ eonf lrmed that was correct. Chairman McNiel asked if the Commie sonata were in concurrence Chet Lhs undergrounding condition •hou ld remain as written. IC wu the conwneu• of the Commieeionare tact it should remain. Caairman McNiel stated CM next area of concern wa• with CondlCion No. SD. Mr. Buller remarked that there Dad been a tequeat for clarification of the neighbor'• ruponeibility for reimbureement. Ne aid that if the other properties acrou the attar dwelop, they would be r¢sponaible Eor reimDUrsinq 9mith'• for a portion of those improvements completerd by amitD's. Chairmen McNiel fs 1C that Mr. Mu it's quution had been if a reimbursement agreement exist• eo they could get some o[ the money back. Mr. culler noted that SD refers Co in-lieu Ease. He as id the neighbor woultl be required to contriDuta the otMr halt at the time of development, and tM work would be done at that Cime. Chairman McNiel noted theca had been remarW aDOUi Engineering condition No. 6. Mr. JanN• orated that smith's would be o611gated to reimDUree CM pro~eet developer on the cut •Lde of vineyard Avenue Eor any improvemenu made to the wuc dde if the dweloper on tae euG aide submlb a reimbursement agreement requot. He aid at tM preunt time the developer on the eat •lde has not submitted a relmbunement agreanwne. Ne acid tact Sm1th'a wculd not have to pay the other developer for any of the improvements rhea they haw to remove and replace. Chairman McNiel thought there aad been questions regarding Engineetinq ConOltion No. 8. Planning Commie lore Minute -21- Oewmber 9, 3994 (~OQ~43 Nr. Jaawa stated the local storm drain is being required to be eonatruetsd at Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard westerly to the channel. Ns asid that normally the first party in installs the local storm drain. Ne sold if the City were to grant reimbursement to Smith's from future development along the south Bide of Foothill Boulevard, then it would also be necaaeary to requite SmitR'e to reimburse Thomas Winery for Lhe local storm drain work Cnay constructed in Vineyard Avenue. He enitl typically there is no rsimbutsenien[ for local storm drain eonsi ru coon. chairmen McNiel noted the applicant had ob)ected to the 3-tan limitation on San Bernardino Road. Nr. Buller stated that the applicant Rad indicated they would want to reeonetruet San Bernardino Road io epeciticat ions wh leh would Randle heavier trucks and would want the limitation bawd upon the spec if icatione, rather than limiting to 3-tone. Commies idnar Nalcher fy It the applicant was consider inq running eem i• on the •erwt whicn would be many tons over tM euggesbd 3-ton limit. Commiuicvr Val Letts nctetl that the strwt i• still vsidential end she felt it would 6e inapproprisb for larger trucks to uw the atraeG. Mt. Buller noted [hers would be [ruck access Etom Foothill Boulevard and from Vineyard Avenue, but [hat Smitn'• desired truck access from tM no[Lh. Chairman NcNisl noted Chore are no dellvsrio at LM sack of the building and the use would be to access tM docks on either side of tna bu Lldinq. Mt. Buller felt the applicant preferred aecese from San Bernardino Road for ease of ingreu end egrus at a eignelized intersection over a less-[reveled public street to the site. Commissioner Me leher felt !M nee of San Bernardino Roed would be to the apparent detriment of otMr properties. He eaitl Ae understood Smith's desire for the opening but ha sLo would undersuad the nei9hbonc~od'• opposition. xe questioned why and when Lhe 3-ton limit we• introduced and when Lt became apparent to Smith's. Nr, Jame• stated Chat !M J-ton limit was sugquted by the City's Tratf lc Enginor. Ns uid tM applicant had bean edviesd of the limit doting Technical Rwiew. commis •ioner Tolstoy felt the[ semis should noc utilize son Barnard lnc Road. xr. Coleman stated a similar limitation had bean plaead on tRa NuWast shopping cantor at Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue regarding accaw down Halms. Commies toners Chitin end Vallstu agnad chat aami• •hou ld not use San Barnard ino Road. Chaldean McNiel questioned iE tne[s would be a nesd for •ny oaten to San Bernardino Road if truck access uen slim lusted. P inn inq Commies ion Minutes -q7- Becember 9, 199] 000244 Nr. eel ler stated that the Bite plan had been reviewed by Fire, Sheriff, Planning, and Engineering Divieiona and it was felt that aceeee to the north along San Bernardino Road ie desired. Commiae inner Toletoy felt the access to San Bernardino Road ie eeaential but he did not think it is eesent ial Eor semis. Commiae inner Valletta stated she had an issue to bring up lnter after the Commies ion had reviewed the conditions which may affect the Commission's feelings on the matter. Chairman McN ie1 noted the applicant had requested that Building and Safety Division Condition No. 1 requiring approvals from San Bernardino County Health, Cucamonga County Water District, and the eehocl dietrict• be tied to certificate cf occupancy rather that issuance of building permits. Mr. Buller stated coat staff recommended that tn. conait ion remain as written. Chairman McNial agreed that if the condition were changed and ch. project war. later denlad by the school dietrict, there would 6e a real problem. Me felt approvals should be obtained on the front end. Commissioner Toletoy stated he would like an adtllt tonal raqulramet providing tar recessing outdoor vending machines. Mr. Buller •t aced that rtsfE wculd support adding that Condit loo. Commissloner valletb stated [hat the aide loading dock areas are inconsistent with whet het been required in the rest of the City. She said other grocery •toraa have all been required to have loading to the rear. She stated •hs nod recently observed a truck trying to posit loo itself Por unloading at the Rialto Smith's store. SM said it's booking view was oDSCUred because of vehiculnr parking in the area, as wcu ld eziat on the east Bide of the building. She noted there la no direct sceea• etra fight Lnto the loading arse and is i• only 12 feet wide. Sha observed that the trucks would nave to maneuver at a right angle Erom the front of the store, 6aekinq up on the blind side trying to get into a 12-foot are. She said she understood the trucks are generally ebcut B feet wide, leaving only 2 feet on each side. She Bald at the Rialto store she had observed [nee a 68-foot truck took seven attempts to maneuver into the dock area where to was not even at a right angle. She aLo thought the view [ran Foothill Boulevard would not be asethetical ly plea ing and nobd tM Lntersact ion i• one of she city's major entrance. Sha commentaO that the 9mi[h'• store in Fontana has a rer loading dock. Sha thought coneidara[LOn should bs given to raconf lguring tM loading dock to the rear o[ the Duilding even though she noted that may require the parches o[ adtlitianel property to the north of the Bite. Commiuionar ch it iea Eelt the site is currently bllghtad and •M Ee li it •hculd have appropriau dwelopment. SM eaiQ sM did not msen to discourage retail bulldinq but she hlt the des iqn of the enter should meet or aced whet sxlsu in the C1ty. EM noud that during ens pre-application nvisw she hsd exprupd eriou• concern^ shout the ^lte plan regard lnq bulldinq Plennlnq Commission Mlnuq• -27- December 9, 1992 000245 orientation, circulation, truck access, massing, and architectural elements. she dLd not foal those ie sues had been adequately addressed. She tlitl not think the design of the activity center at the Poothill 9oulsvard and Vineyattl Avenue intersection meats the intent of the Foothill Boulevard 5peciELc Plan. Sha tali the ptojett should be redesigned. she concurred with Commieaioner vallette'o comments regarding the 1oadl ng docks. she did not think there w9e any other location in the City where a from of Bide Loading sack is permittetl and the particularly opposed one at such an important intersection. she Eelt the Bite hoe enormous potential which was not being realized with Che design of the project. Commissioner 'foletoy at at ed that was one of the reasons ha had asked about the Bite line because he also nod a problem with the aide loading areas. Commissioner Valletta noted there had been a pct-applicntion workshop at which it was stated that aide loading docks were an issue. Chairman NeNiel stated there had been objections from all the Commssioners and smith's nod maintained that side load lnq dotke were cons Ltent with what they typically do end the concerns coultl be mitigated. Xs noted that Sn the Design Rsvieu prowu tMre hnd been attempts to mitlgste the impact of CM side loading docks through deign. Hs said he was taken aback by CasmUSloner Vellette'e witnessing the difficulty of maneuvering a truck into such an srea and he was less comfortabU with the design in light of the entrance off Vineyard Avenue at that location. He tali there may be tra[fic problems along Vineyard Avenu se a result of a truck trying to enter ihs loading Qock area. Ha noted the Commission could condition Che timo• of day that trucks could vu Cho dock area, but he felt that would be extremely diff ice le to police. Commies inner Chit isa felt that limiting Che hours of delivery would not address [he aesthetic concerns. Chairman McN iel stated they hnd attempted Co mit igate the visual impact at Design Review bscauu Chet is whsi CM dwoloper had requested. Commie ions[ Me lcher tiered he was also conprMd about Commies inner Vellette'• comnent• regard log [rook maneuvering. He stated ha was not personally opposed to [root-facing truck docks end he felt they had Wren properly nddruud, but hs quutionsd if a truck maneuvering diagram hnd bun prepared for the siu and, if so, if atetf was convinced that li works. Mr. Buller sieted Cnat one had bun prepared and seatf tilt that is would work. Commissioner Melchor eked if the truck maneuvering diagram was baud upon using San Bernardino Roed for trucks !n excess of J tone. Mr. Coleman stated the diagram depicted acres from both Vineyard AVenW and Foothill Bou Uvard. Ha recal led ihet smith's had do scribed Cho enaGrn loading are a to bo uud by smaller trucks, such so brad trucks, and tM mein dock area would be on tM wesi ^!do of the build Lnq. Planning Commission Minutes -1C- Docomber 9, 1991 QOn246 Commieeioner Valletta stated she had observed a qB-foot truck. Mr. Coleman thought that would be she normal size of a semi. Commieeioner Valletie indicated that stores also use daub la semis for deliveries. Commieeioner Chitiea obeetved that in ocher projects throughout the City, oven in the industrial areas, measures are taken to orient trucks away from the automotive traffic areas. Sne did not think the project ie an appropriate dseign, particularly at ono of Lha major intercecc ion entries into the City. She also felt it was a safety issue. Commieeioner Vallatte agreed it was a safety ieeua. Chairman McNiel acknowledged ChaC it was a matter of concezn. He said they had attempted to message the design based upon whet had been presented by Smith's. Comm iel ionsr Chitiea felt that the Dee iqn Aev iew Committee should no! dseign the project, but to try to help an applicant meet she needs of Che community a• best a• possible. Shs did not feel that it meant ChnC the entire commission had to accept the application. Cammiu ionsr Tolstoy asked iE ii would be proper to hear from Lhe applicant regarding tM dseign of the Fontana sears with it• rear dock. He revelled that at the pre-application review, tae Commission had requested rear Load Lnq and Smith's had replied taut all of their stores have front loading. Commissioner Chitiea felt there were greater problems than juai the loading dock. MoL io n: Moved by Chitiea, to direct at efE to prepare a resolution of tlenial for the next available mast inq. Commi uioner Melchor seconded the motion far purpou• of discussion and indicated he might vote against [M motion. He sagguted tN applicant be eonsu lied tc see if the applicant would pre Hr the Commie ion move forward vita such a motion or requut a continuance to allow tine( to possibly addree• some of tM comments hard tonight. He oburved that the applicant would have the right to appeal to the Clty Council and he suggested teat the Commiaeloners consider what action the City Council might take. Chairman McNiel reopened the public peering [o gain input from the applicant. Mr. Klanq •t aced the Fontana •tora ha• vastly different property dimensions, conftgu rat ion, size of total project, and ground sieve( ion which permLtted tear loading. He uttl he i• working on other pro jecte In Northern Calltornla which ere nos tight with no grad inq problems and in most case [hey can uc Lllze tear load inq docks. He Ulf the grade elevatLOns an0 length of tae parking stalls in (root precluded rear loading. He uld because of cM di[[lculty in severing large enough parcels, Smleh'• hu nod to use front Planning Commi a ion Minutes -]B- December 9, 1994 QOIItiK~ loading with imaginative screening treatments to make the stores look good and work. Ha atatad there htd been a study on truck traffic pasterns and Smith's engineers assured him ii would work. He said there had been 18 months of good faith effort on Chs part of 5mith'• and City staff to arrive at a plan that was aeeeptaDle to everyone ana Smith's waa now in virtual agreement wish what had been proposed. He nobd that the coat of carrying the projse[ is almost $10,000 a wank and ha quest icnsd how long Sm ith'a could carry tM proj act. Ha was concerned about qusral eiaNmsnU that the plan does not moat somsone'• conception. xe said he was not comfortable Baying [hey could negotiate further and that ha would like to diecuea Che loading dock question with ihs architect and engineer. He thought it may be better to take the project on through the administrative proceea to see where the bottom line ie. He said he heard to CwmaLsion'• concerns and M wa• now concerned about Smit h'• pos ieion and investment and where they would ga Erom this poine. Ha said tDetr goal i• to open a store in the Community and provide 350 joDe and at lust $250,000 idea tax. Ha noted the it project sou ld De cleaning up an admitted bl Lghted area and ha talc it could be one of their most beautiful projects. Ha uid ha now felt some of the Commiuionere had expteued concern that the •ite waa not awn a proper place Ear them. Commissioner Val UlU etaLd thsi her concerns about the dta planning end loading anu in no way capruenta an attitude that Smith'• is not wanted in the City. she felt ie will bs a good project. She noted that the loading area had bean an lone with all five CommLsicnere during the pre-appl ieation workshop. She noted eha[ two Commiuionsra had served on eha Design Rsviaw CommiiLN and now Defon the full Commission the loading area >s still an issue. she hoped the applicant and Clty could work CogetMr to relocau tM loading areas. Mr. Kiang uid that made him feel batter. Commiesionar ToLtoy stated there had never bun any Comments shout the desirability of Smith'• in eM City, but the Commie ianer• had exprosud concerns about asfety mattar• and authetice. Mr. Along stated M did not parsons lly believe Chars should be Gruck traff ie on San Barnard ino Aoad. Ha said the loadlnq docks an the side of the afore era tied into their merchandistnq plan tneide tM store. He uid that is all very carafe lly planned. Ha uid that if the loadlnq dock area is changed, it eraatu oven opatat ions problems. He sugguud Mr. Mu lr talk about the loading area. Commissioner Tolstoy rwellad thnt at the prreppllcaeion review, the Commiesionen had bun told that the atop configuration could not be changed and there could not ba any otMt location o[ the loading dock. Mr. Klanq responded that amith'• had learns California. Ns stand Chat In other anu oL in[lex ib le because eM land is pretty flat, ehers and cost uvlnq• are obv ion. He said that upo haw devLed dlf tenor plane and have waled dow store to better fit on available proportlu. Planning Commission Minute -26- d a lot •Lnn coming Cc the country, they Dad bean an gr ld Grattlc patterns, n coming to California they n eM size of eau of CNir Dwember 9, 3992 000248 Chairman McNiel crated that during all of the meetings with the applicant, discanfort had been expraesed regarding the Front-end Loading. Mr. Muir stated that the Fontana store conEigurat ion is completely different and not viable. He Bald that Smitn'e had Duilt numerou^ stares with the configuration proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, including one in Yorba Linda and one in Mission Viejo. Xs said they had not made the scope of cosmetic mod if ieations on any other et ore and the proposed more for Rancho Cucamonga could very well be the most expeneivr store in the chain, with their rat imttrs being 51,500,000 over their typical development. coats in site and 6u ildlnq cosmetic improvsmeni •. He said that typically they new five to •Sx deliveries per work by armia which are not genrcslly larger than 6a fart. Ns said wch deliverlrs are typically in the early morning. He statetl the •LG has a atrep grade trandtion between the front and the rea[ of the store. Xe said if there weer adsquab etrrrt accsee, rear-loading docks would require a high retaining wall on the back •ide of the store and create a bigger visual impact than what i• currently proposed. He said the propowtl docks are buried on both •ide• of the store end they would De glad to provide cross-sectional siN studiae snowing the reUvant rlwstion of the docks to Foothill aoulward. Ha said they had made a Change to flair [M western dock. Ne saki trellius were proposed along the dock wall and over the dock bays, eo thai vines would sofUn the rl Gct across the front of the bays. Ne said there L typically a 50-foot ramp Lnto the Day, so Lhe trucks are Dack from the throat of tM Day. Xe stated the dock on CM went •ide i• Haired completely away from any visual !lace fray Poothlll Boulevard. Xa said that it would W necessary to have acceu further north on Vimyard in order to have a direct acces Lnto rear-loading docks and it would be essentially impoo ible to gain the ramp down into the docks because of tM clever ion increase along Vlneyud. He uid that tM nature of the site and the limibd access from Vineyard and Foothill would neceaaitate [ruck maneuver lag in !root of the store, particularly if acces• from San Bernardino Road were limited. Hs felt that the configuration desired Dy tM Commie ion would preclude any grocery store on Cho site. commissioner Val Lete asked the width of tM loading area on the wratern •Lde. Mr. Mule stated It i• a double truck bay, so it would be 40-44 Eeet. Chairman McNisl asked if Mr. Muir would consider working on wttn the Commiuion or if he would prehr the CommLSion proceed wish tM motion as voiced. Mr. Muir uKed what could be gelned by referring the prof act beck to staff. Commissioner Melchor stated it would 61 neceuary to return to eta t{ because the Commieeion did not have a resolution of denial for adoption. Mr. Muir aeKed it there would not be an opportunity for further design issues. Commissioner Ch idea cured the •lternaeivs would be to 9o back •nd redesign the projwt end she felt LC would require major design changes. She felt the entire •lu plan should be reviewed. Plano Lnq Commie ion Ninutes -27- oecember 9, 1994 00049 Nr. Muit felt that bringing the issue Co a vicee at the Commission level woe ltl not preclude that from happening. He waa not ours what was to be gained by going back to staff if it wan not an opportunity for further deg ign changes. Chairman MCN irl etaisd Lhe Commission did not have a resolution of denial to atlopt and the motion on the floor was to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial. Mr. Huiz asked if the Commission coultl not vote on the p[ojecC wiLROUi Chat recommendation. Chairman McNiel stated that waa the motion on the floor. Ha said the resolution of denial would be adopted at the next meeting. Mr. Muir asked if there wsv any other avenues available. Chairman HCNiel stated the applicant could also consent to a continuance if the motion were to De pulled. Commiuioner Val Ltte augguted that if the applicant waa willing to do major redesign of the nits plan, the motion may be pulled. Mr. Muii caked iE ha could diecua• the maiier with hie client. Commiarionrr Chitira avggretrd a abort vicee• might be taken to allow tM applicant to discuu the options. Mr. Combo asked iE the public hearing wne at i11 open. Chairman NcNirl ri ated it bed bran opened only to gain a roponw from the applicant to a rpse if is question. Hr •aid the hearing was not open to take any additional test imcny. TM Commission rrcrord from 11:15 p.m. to 11:20 p.m. Mr. Muir stated the dock configuration had been Cane idered and they did not feel it could be draigned in any other way bseause of she conf Lgurstion of the sits, the elope, and the limited accasa. Hr said they were not trying to force ihr iuue with the Commie ion, but tMy tlid nos fsrl it could be recon[igured. Me alsc stated It was not a matter of acquiring ihr property to the north. He uid their circulation plan had been vviewsd by one of the moat reputable tu[tic snq ineev in SoutMrn California, who indlcsted it would not create an unufe aiiuation. Me sold Smlth'e oleo hoe had ax per Lance in ouch dock conf Lquratione and they would not create a lieDllity for the store. Nr aequeebd that if the matter were vturnrd to staff for preparation oC a rraolutlon of den is 1, Chat a special meeting be Mid on December 15, 1992, in order not to delay their ability to •n itiate an appeal. Mr. But Lr mated that if CM nwtion were to pose, it could De pvparad for a apeclal muting end he ugquud December 15, 1992, ae a ponibie date. Commie loner Chit Lea etagd she would like to reltsreb that her oppoeii ion to the project was not to SmiC h'e a^ a uur, in fact •M would like to welcome Plann lnq Commiuion Minute -28- December 9, 1992 OQl I~Q them to the ecmmunity. Sne said hoc concern was the speeif is location of the project. She Ee It the concecna were greater than just the loading dock, but also the entire configuration of the property, the ingress and egress, the design of the satellite buildings, the orientation to adjacent propett Lea and the corner, and the activity center at Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Commies ioner Me lcher stated he was not convinced it would be impossible to locate the docks in any otner configuration. He et ated there ie also a grade difference at the shopping center at Milliken and Highland and that loading dock ie to the rear. Ne noted tnat through the use of landscaping and retaining walla it was poaeible to create a drive access all the way around the rear aide of the shopping center and create a pleasant appearance to Highland Avenue. Ha thought it could Oe used at this site bui it would probably mean that aceese to San Bernardino Road may have to be abandoned. Comm iseioner Chit iae notetl tnat ei Ea ea Line and Haven and Lemon and Haven there ware similar •ituat ions wish gratle changes where appropriate designs hews bean employed. 5ha noted that the Planning Commiasicn EirsC saw the project eight months ago at apre-application review and all of those concecna were voiced at that time eo that the applicant had early input from the Commission. She stated that her motion stood. Commies ioner Meleher stated Gnat hie second stood. Chairman McNiel restated that the motion was to direct atafE to prepare a reeo LUt ion of denial. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIBL, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried It was the conseneu• of the commission Ghst the Commission would convene a special meeting at 4:45 p.m. on December 15, 1992. Motion: Movetl by McNlel, eecontled by Tolsioy, carried 6-1 (Me lcher no), continue beyogd 11:00 p.m. w R . ~ ''/_ J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS6ESME 1 - A residential subdiv Lemon and design review for the developme E 20 sing le family lore on 4.39 acres of lend in [he Lbw-Metlium Ra~~ nc ial District (4-E dwelling unite per acre), located on the notch C~ of San Eernertl ino Road, oast of Vineyard Avsnua - APN: 10E-091-08 slated File: Variance 91-I1. Staff recomma nde issuance of a Naga DeclaraYlon. i R. VARIANCE 91-11 - HU - request Co reduce the raga iced minimum rear lot depth from 90 to oat [or 1 lot within a proposed 2D-lot eubd lv isaon in the Low-Medium •idential District (4-E dwelling unite par ac ro), located on the no •ide of San Bernardino Roed, asst of Vinsyeid Avenw - APN: ~091-08. Re leted File: TantaG ive Tract 14405. .: `•~ CommL^ion Minutes -19- DecamDer 9, 1991 000251 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Nesting December 15, 1992 ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chit Lea, Larry McKie 1, John Melcher, Peter ToLatoy, Wendy Valletta ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Etad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, P[incipsl Planner; Riek Gomez, Community Development Di[acioi; Den Jamae, Senior Civil Engineer; Beverly Niswn, Auoc iota Planner; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commieaion secretary; Tarry Smith, Park Planning Development Suparintpndent (tour only) TOUR OP SPORTS COMPLEX The five Planning Commiaeionen Coured the apoita comp lax beginning at 3:00 p.m. an December 15, 1992. They ware accompanied by Community Development Director Rick 4omez, City PlanneY Brad Buller, and Park Planning Dwelopman[ Superintendent Tarry Smith. The tour concluded at 4:15 p. m. and Lae Planning Commieaion recuwd until 4:65 p.m. FNVIRONALNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CDND ITIONAL DSE PER IT 92 IB SMITH' - The development of s commerc lal shopping wntar consisting of a 75,000 square foot grocery store, two eatelll[e build Loge of 3,500 square face each, end a drive- thru pad of 4,800 square Eeet on 10.6 scree of lend in the Community CommerciU District (subarea 2) of the Foathlil Boulward spsclE lc Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-OJ, S, 8, 15, 20, 21, and 49. Staff recommends Lsnance of e mlt igatad Nagai lvs Declarat loo. Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meat ing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commie•lo~ to order at 4:45 p.m. TM meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic center, 10500 Civic Canter Dcive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Chairmen M<Niel then lad in the pledge of allegiance. Brad culler, CLty Planner, gave a recap of the history of the project. Ne noted that the project had gone through a pre-application review and several du lqn review meetings. Me ttatsd that during tM process she applicant had bean adviud of tM leauu and concerns of tM Planning Commieaion and staff end the epplicsnt had made Boma changes. He said that fo llowing the leaf Design Review Comm ittea meeting she project had been forwarded to eha full 000:52 EXh'~Di1' "E" Planning Caimiibeion with a reeemmendat ion for approval. He stated that at the end of iha public hearing tRS Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial. He ea id that if the Planning Commiaelon allowed add Ltlonal testimony, that it could only take teat imony on Leauee raised at the public Rearing on December 9, 1992. He also indieats0 that staff ha0 provided the reeolut ion of dental as requested by the Commiee ion as well as the re solution of approval i[ the Commission should feel that today's ceatimony indicated the applicant had made efforts to address the issues which had been raised. He turned the meeting back to the Chairman to determine if the Commies Loners wished to open the hearing for public tact imony. Chairman McNial stated ha had talked with the applicant's architect following the December 9, 3992, meeting and the architect Rsd asked what they could da to salvage the project. Xe said he had told tae srchitac! they could make a short presentation to adtltas• tea issue of loading dock placement and Lts effect on circulation and Vineyard Avonua end tae aesthetic iaeuas of front loading tlocks. Xe said they had not die cussed further aeehitactutal is eve s. He asked if tae other Commiasionara would like to open up the Rearing to see if the matter warranted return inq the ptojeot to design roviaw or review by the toll Commiuion. Commissioner Tolsioy stated that he would like to hear [ram the appl leant if any new informer ion was available. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Prescott Muir, Prescott Muir Architects, 1744 Berkeley Street, Santa MODLCa, 'toted they had looked at the poesibil icy of moving the dock to the back of the building, but SmLth'• felt that would be unworka6l• 6acauu it would create a blind corner for tea trucks to maneuver info the back and would raga Lre a rear yard setback var Lance because of the ex Ltlnq residences. He acid if the property ware converted to commercial, es shown in tRa General Plan, a zero lot line would be sufficlant. He indicated thty mneidewd ellminat Lng iha arises from San BernerdLno Road, creating a retaining wall, and lowering the grade to dock elevation to allow trucks room to menauver, but that would also need eha variances on iRe setback and parking. Xe •ald they Nit iha propowd cant Lguration wu [M only you lb la one without requLcing a variance from LN CommLelon. Me stated CRere wars other opportunLL ia^ to mauaga the project. Me saggestad the eastern dock could be •liminated by creating • corridor Ln back of the Du Lldinq Dut that would man losing arts Cra111^ element or approximately 12 perking apace. Ha thought the project did not have excess parking available. Mr. Buller asked i[ the lost perking spaces could not De regained on the sae[ •ide o[ the building in the srsa from which tae load inq dock was being moved. Mr. Muir agreed it would be poe•ib l• to •lLminat• rho oast dock, eh ift tM bu tiding forward fi feat to melnuln an interior corridor, melntatn tM setback, end place double losd Lng parking on iha aaai •Lde of tea build inq. Xa aid they would not need any varlancee. Commie loner Tolsioy (alt share may be • grading problem with such ^ 'hits. Planning Commie ion Mlnutu -2- December 15, 1992 ~O,i53 Mr. Muir acid there is a 7 portent elope in the area. He said the back of the building mould not change. He etatad there is a 16-foot grade eUvat ion dif fsrence between the first finished floor of the apartments and the floor of the store. Ha •sid that was why they hatl Eelt a rear dock eoultl be hidden with an effective greenDeli separation. Commieeionar Melchor thought the larger footprint area of the building may mean more parking would ba required. Mr. Muir agreed that may bo truce. Conmissioner Melchor asked if the additional floor area would be allocated for nandtrueks to service the uet •ide of the etora. Mr. Muir agreed it would not ha aalee apace and would not generate any atldit icnal perking demand. Commissioner Melchor asked if the additional square footage could ho factored out of Lhe parking calculation requirement •. ' Mr. eu ller thought a minor exception process could W used. He said that would require a notice to the neighDOra. Commiuiomr Ch it iea noted that would still laeve an exposed dock on the went side. Mr. Muir felt the wunrn dock would not be exposed. He etatad tMy could develop a •ite model to Dhow how cha dock could be concealed. Na noted it i• flared away Erom the main view corridor. Commie loner Valletts eeketl Eor an explanet ion of how the rear dock would uu berming. Mr. Mulr showed where the rear dock would be lccatad and etatad a 12-14 foot retaining wall would he needed Ln addiC ion to closing off the acuu eo San Bernardino Road. Commisslonet CDitiu asked if a variance would be required for the rear dock. Mr. Buller felt there were find ing• that sou ld be mstle to grant the verianea because of tDe lot roof Lgurat icn and eha grades. Ha 4It [het a minor exception might also be available. Commie stoner Chiiiu asked if a public nearing woultl ba haltl. Mr. Bulloc stated a public hearing would be heltl only it a variance ware nquind. Commissioner Vsl UtN etatad that ae the pre-application rev ieu workshop direct LOn had Dean given to have all docks in the nor of the Du tiding. She eked why the eppl leant Dad net pursued that avenw. Planning Commission Minutes -1- December 15, 1992 00054 Mr. Hu it stated they had planned aide docks because of a combination of trying to maintain the minimum parking required and trying to accommodate the goo le of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in creating an activity center. He said that Smit h'e felt they would need one outlying drive-th ru pad in order to make the project economically Eeaeible. He said that in order tc aeeommadate the rear docks they would have to buy the adjacent property and they had received direction thnt nn additional feet food drive-thru pad would nct by palatable. He stated Smith's felt that the project would not be economically Eeaeible to absorb the coat of the additional property tc ac conmuadate rear docks. Xe Eelt it would also require a 16-18 foot retaining wall. Mr. Buller saitl that staff would prefer ut ilizinq only the western dock and expanding the building footprint rather than eliminating the access to San Bernardino Road and vliminat ion of the rear parking area. Chairman Mc Niel asked if the western dock could not be moved north to be more hidden from view from Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Muir said that may be pose ibis. Mr. Huller ea id that iE the dock ware moved north, Cho grade may be mart difficrlt for maneuvering the truth. He said Chat during the site plan review cheer had burn connwnt• about traffic flow and there had bean discussion that it would be easier for user who wished to travel north on Vineyard Avanu• to ex to to San Bernardino Road becauw there would shoo be a signalized intersection to enter Vineyard. Nr sa ld hr could be concerned about any designs that rl iminatiM acen• from iha project to San Bernardino Road. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there Ls often a line of cnr• going south on vineyard Avenue attempting to cros^ Foothill Boulevard end Coosa cats would conflict with anyone attvmpttnq co make a lift from [he eastern dr ivv o[ the center onto Vineyard Avenue. chairman McNiel felt the changes proposed ware vary dramsiic and would require that the project qo back through design rovisw. Me asked if enough information had barn preaantetl to allow the applicant to procee• through design review. Commissioner Tolstoy stated ha would like to give the applicant the opportunity to return to daaign rrviaw. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea felt the iasuae ware mnjor in terms of circulation including access to San Bernardino Road, moving ihr docks from exposure to Foothill Boulevard, building art lcu lot ion in front and rear, the nand Eor add i[ionel bu titling movement, relatlonvhip to adjacent reeidencea, and appropriate daaign• for the satellite buildings. She sold Chat if those thinq• could be achiwed, It would be sppropriab to go back through the design rev iaw proceu. She wa• not aura the project would fit without acquiring addit tonal property. Planning Commission Minuiea -4- December 15, 1992 ~?Qn255 Commissioner Matcher stated he understood that the pad bu Tidings could be part of a separate application. He felt that if Smith's were willing to examine the ideas proposed and show the pose ib le rase lt, that would be a more rational approach than to deny the project. Commies loner Toleioy stated ha had nothing to add. Commies io ner Valletta at aced that when the project was initially reviewed at the pre-application workshop, the main concern addressed was Cho dssiie of the majority of the Commiesionera tc have rear loading decks. She fa l[ the Commission had been consistent in the original direction at the pre- epplicetion review and in their denial of the proposal in expressing a desire for the rear docks. Sho thought it is mainly a safety issue. She felt there were still serious internal circulation problems. Sho thought there ace potent Lally hazardous pedestrian <roesing erase in the currant proposal. She did not favor approving the project as presented and felt that major ehangos wets needed to the site plea and eitculetlon plan. Commissioner Chitiea asked if Commieeianer Vallotto was eatietiod with Cho architsetural elements of rho building. Comm issloner Ve11eLU uid •M had some concern• regarding the architecture but her wrtou• caneerns were with the loading dock and tM exLCinq internal circulai LOn. She recalled making statements during the pre-appl icatlon review thst existing Smith's markets have vary little movement and ro lie! on the front of the buildings. She Eelt CM Oee Lqn Review CommltGa hatl done the best they could with what had Deen ptes8nes0 by the applicant but indicated she did not feel it i• up to the standard of other projects within the City. She et etod there is not a commercial pro jsct locaiad anywMre in the City with front loading. Chairman McN Tel Eelt Chow issues could be readdteeeed aC design review. Xe auggeeted eho project go back through the process. rye tslt the major Laeuoe could be nsolvad. Hr. Buller asked what the Commiuion wu expaciinq the applicant to change. Ne said Commie TOner Chitiea had indieeNd tMrs should De significant chsngu in the Bite plan and erchttectute end cammiasioner Velletb hsd indicated there •houle be major changes in tM site plan and some changes in architecture. Commissioner Vallaete felt there should 6e more emphasis on movement of the build lag. She asked if it would be better to workshop the item rather then only having two commis•ionere at design review. Commies ionar Chiiioe felt that would be bast. Mr. Buller agroed that all five Commi es ionar• •hOU ld De part o[ the procus. Xe quest toned it it would De aceeptablq if the applicant •llminabd Cho eastern dock and providaO a plan showing all access off the western dock without msklnq otMr changes to she site plan. Planning Commies Lon Minutes -5- [)ecember 15, 1994 OOn2SV Cha itman McNiel Ee It that would not be acceptable Commissioner Valletta atatetl the City implemented a pre-application design review proeeae to allow applicants to receive early direction from rho entire Commission. She acid direction had been quite clear at the pre-application workahop that there should be no frone dock areas vis ib la from the street and she did not feel the City ahou ld try to massage the plane submittetl. Mr. Sul ler requested clarification if it was the pcaii ion of the Planning Commie aion that theca should be absolutely no front dock doors no matter what. He said if CaaG were the case, she applicant could then decide whether to pursue additional design review meeiinge. Chairman McNiel atatad he felt that Commiseionera Chitiea and VaLletie were firm in their appoeit ion to front docks. Commissioner Toletoy stated he also has a problem with front loading. He ea id the Commiae ion had been told at the pre-application review workahop that Smith'• could not operate a store anises they hatl the loading as depicted on the currant Bite plan •, but aEtarward• the Cammiesionere learned there acs etorea which acs back loatled. ' commissioner Valletta stated she did some further checking and found there are stores in Glendora and RLvere ids in addition Lo the Fontana store with rear loading. Chairman McNrsl fair chat rear loading would De the appropriate direction to pursue. Ne agreed a full Commission workahop should be held antl atltl itional attention should be paid to bu •ld ing articular Lon. Mr. Buller recommended reopening Lae public hearing to allow the applicant to atltlreea it they would be willing to consider a design that would eliminau all front loading. He suggested that iE the applicant were willing, the Commission may wish to set a workahop data In early .7enuery. Chairman McNiel reopened the pubiLC hearing. Mr. Muir stated they Celt iMy had already gom through the procue. xe as id their understandlnq at Lhe last Deelgn Review Commletee meeiing was that historically tM recanmendat ion• of she du Lgn review proceu carried considerable weight at the Planning Commiu ion end would not raga ire aubeequent design rsvitw proeeues. He 61t [o go back through the design review proceu would be a •ls-month atop backward. Me indicated that Smlth'• and their legal counsel would prefer a vote on the project at tail time, even if it were a denial, to allow teem to par sue the metier through an appeal. He apologizetl for the mleunderstand ing that the Commleeloness Ee It Smith's dose not hove rear-facing dock canf igurat Lana. He esitl n majority of their stores do have rear-facing dock conf igu rat lone, but shay felt tae ^1te contlgureeion demands aide-loatl ing docks. Ray Lavange, 6123 Per idott, Rancho Cucamonga, asked about the corridor. He said is 1• a heavily congested sru and he fiend there may De a problem if Planning Commission Minutu -6- December 15, 1892 4'©~tiS there Le only a little turn-in going south on Vineyard and people may back up Lnto otRet intersections. chairman NcNiel again elcsetl the public hearing. Commisa loner Melchet asked if it would be necessary to go through the denial process if the applicant was willing to make the changes Mr. Nuir had suggested,. Chairman NeNiel reopened the public hearing Nr. Nu it stated they would be willing to make the changes they had diacusaed but their carry coats eta ao expensive that time is of the ee aence and they did not wieR to initiate a long and exeenviw design rovtaw proceu re-examining every tacet of the project. Ne felt if they could limit Chs tlebate to strict ly the dock configuration and they received enough feedback that one of the two or three proposed achemee would make the project acceptable, they would be willing to work with the Commission. Chairman McNiel cloud the public heating. Ne felt Chat if the dceks ors moved, it dramati tally changes tae footprint of tN building end cruNS probles~ with reepeet to atchitwture Chat would have eo be addreuad. Motion: Moved by chitiea, seconded 6y Tolatoy, to adopt too reaolut ion denying Conditionsl Usa Petmic 92-18 without pte}utlics. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONSAS: CHITIEA, NCN IEL, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOEa: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER ABSENT: COMMiSSIONEAS: NONE -carried Mr. eu ller stated if tMtf were an appes 1, the matter could pose Lbly be heard at the eacond City Council Meeting in January. . . . . ADJOUANMSNT Motion: Moved by Nslcher, uconded Dy Cait lea, co adjcurn. 5:35 p.m. - The Planning Commission adjournod to a workshop at 5:00 p.m. on January 6, 1993, at the Tolstoy residence regard tnq Plannlnq Commission goal^ and prior it le s. Respectful ly eubmltted, B~BUl e[ S•c[eta[y Planning Commission Minutes -7- December 35r 1992 ~/ llVifw:aR.~ RICHARD & MARIE REICHELT 1846 N VALLEJO WAY UPLAND CA 91786 (909) 985-8330 December 2, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 RE: Conditional Use Permit 92-18 - Smith's Foothill Blvd & Carnelian/Vineyrd Dear Planning Commission Members: We are writing as owners of our parcel of property that borders the Smith's project to the north on San Bernardino Rd. We wanted to express our concerns for a better quality development of that corner if all the parcels from Foothill to San Bernardino Rd were to be included in the project. We were originally contacted on June 19, 1990 by agents of Smith's who wrote that they were y~y interested in acquiring our parcel o£ property for their project. We negotiated a price with Smith's and soon after opened escrow. By agreeing to sell, we believed at that time that we were acting in the best interest of ourselves, the city of Rancho Cucamonga's Foothill Specific Plan, the immediate neighborhood and of course Smith's progressive development. It was cur understanding that the Plan called for one developer for the entire development. We were made aware on April 8, 1992 that Smith's site plan now did not include our property and they would not be acquiring our parcel. This was several months after they had notified the city of their intent to exclude our parcel. After a meeting this morning with staff from your planning dept we learned of Smith's new master plan which shows "some future developer' be left to develop our remanent parcel. We can show where it would not be economically feasible to build on or market it in the near future. Indeed it creetes a hardship on us as present owners and severely limits our opportunities. We are concerned that the City's "gateway project" may be left with inadequate parking, inadequate traffic lanes and conditions, and two a artment building structures nearing the end of their usef~~~q~c life. ~~nws9 ~X~f t~lT n~u There exists foz all parties concerned, a window of opportunity if Smith's develops the complete parcel at a the small proportionate cost for them. Zt seems highly improbable that a quality development would ever 6e economically feasible in the foreseeable future on the small remanent parcels. We understand the city's ethics preclude "forcing" Smith's to purchase our property as they originally intended. however we trust with vour encouracement and more in depth review of the project, all parties concerned can be equally enjoined Res ctfully, ~_~unApg~ EGG Richard S Marie Reichelt .NU LPL, nrvr. 71NG DI4'SION u.c 81992 '?dC ll 212 3 P?1 i1i~i~~5~i; H F~~;~o~°zso j1~ 7Bbn, ~vax ~'~'` - '3719 e - _ _ _ f ~1 1 n it r~~u City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, C.A. 91729 Re: Conditional Use Permit 92-18 - Smith's Dear Planning Commission Members: In view of the fact that this commercial development comprises the major gateway to Rancho Cucamonga from the West, we feel that a better quality development for Smith's corner should be entexta fined from them than what is presently under consideration. The three parcels beginning at the Southwest corner of San Bernardino and Vinyard should be included and made part of Smith's plan. These parcels were in fact under contract by Smith up until September of this year. Not only that, but Smith's mitigating plan for the development of these parcels as required 'by the City, are not economically feasible! Their plan for this area really does nothing more but assure the City that two already aging apartment buildings will blight the appearance of this attractive development for years to come. what could be built on that small parcel that would generate the income necessary to provide a return on not only the cost of combining the three parcels, but pay for the expensive offsites the Engineering Dept. feels are necessary? Some o£ these are: Extending Smith's right turn lane North to San Bernardino Rd., relocating the traffic signal at that corner as well as installing the usual underground utilities, sidewalks, etc. How much better it would be if the Commission would decide to maintain the City's integrity to the Foothill Specific Plan that envisions one entity developing the entire corner. We therefore ur,~: the Commission to suggest to Smith's that they submit a plan that includes the development of these parcels by them. then the concerns of your Engineering Dept. could be addressed as to the needed extension of that right turn lane and the signal relocation associated with that. Sincerely, .,r r Y . -~,IYCNO Cu... .n., Dirt":ING CIV +~nN Calvin & Mar Reed, UEC $1992 y part owners of ~ the apt, bldg, at 8863 S.B. Rd. :i9!m~ll~~«~.!1~is 736 Santa Victoria ,( ~ x'1516 Solana Beach, CA 92075 (619-792-8058) QO("~62 u ~~3w December 3, 1992 cirr ~' '~4vc~;o c., City of Rancho CUCamOnga c/o Planning Department • Planning Commissioners ,~ OTC ?799 Rancho Cucamonga, Calrfomia 91730 ~ "'`~IIDlyJ12l1t2t$~g 6 Development Qf ~ orooertv al Foothill Blvd.. Vin r Avenue ~ $@L Bernardino ;343U:~Pnmarv Develcoer _ Smth's Food Dear Planning Commissioners: I am the property owner of 8008 vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga (Southwest comer Vineyard 8 San Bemardino Roads). Over 1 1/2 years ago Smith's Food contacted me about purchasing my property. Smith's was going to purchase my property abng with ~j ~@ other DrODertles in the block for their own use. Umil just recently did I become aware that Smith's was not going to close escrow on my parcel abng with two adjacent properties to the west of mine. My property was scheduled to dose escrow on September 1, 1992. 1 apologize for the length of this letter... but a lot has happened the past couple of years. In case some of you are rtd aware I had planned to develop rtry corner parcel prior to Smith's coming akxrg in earty 1991. I received approval from your committee, the planning commission and the City Council. I paid all the necessary teas and secured the building, grading and engineering permits for construction. I had paid almost $60,000 for these fees to the City. Then Smith's came along. (Note: I was a 1/3 owner of the parcel directly South of the comer - app. 2 acres). Smith's had signed convects for all the other parcels in the block wfth the exception of mine and one of the apartrnent complexes. I informed Smith's that I did not want to sell the Corder because I was in the process of beginning conswdion. Smith's informed me they would stop the while project and look for another bcation... if they could not tle up All THE PARCELS IN THE BLOCK. Since we tlBQ jQ CFI 1 the 2 acres to a primary deveoper for the whole block, I agreed to sell my corner to Smith's. Sometlme In 1986-89 me and my partners submitted a devebPmem for the 2 acre parcel; however, lt became very dear that the City wanted a SINGLE devekper for the entre block. In fad, lt got very difficult to proceed with our proposed devebpment (2 saes) and we abandoned tl1e project. Later on I began to see the benefits end reasoning why the City of Rancho Cucamonga was looking for a singb developer for the entire block. There were several properties in the block that had older buildings with little useful economic life in them; some vacant properties and the flood contra district property at the west end of the block. It did seem to make sense to have a single major developer that could recttly and dean up the whob mess, QOQ26.3 1 u ~~y In easy 199t Smith's had every parcel in the entire block under contract which would satisiy the Foothill Specfic Plan. The roller rink, restaurant, apartment complexes and vacant land would all be under the control of a single major developer. The Foothill Specific Plan would be satisfied, the City would get a quality development and the blight would be totally removed from the site. Seems like everyone's needs would be met! Unfortunately, everything did not work out as planned. Three parcels consisting of approximately 38,000 sq.ft. (less than t acre) are now being pulled out of Smith's development. Smith's development consists of something in the range of 500,000 sq.ft. The three property owners are now being told by Smith's the reason for this is: (1) does not make economic sense, (2) City of Rancho Cucamonga led Smith's on about receiving Redevelopment Funds and was subsequently turned down by the City; and (3) the City of Rancho Cucamonga would not allow 3mRh's to fully develop the property as originally planned. It seems (according to Smith's representative) that Smith's met all the standards with a larger development (first submittal), but the City cut down the number Of leasable square feet. These are the reasons I have been given for not proceeding with the purchase of my parcel and the two apartment complexes. M Smith's plan is approved as currently submitted, it will be going against the guidelines of the Foothill Specific Ptan and the blight in the naighbomood will remain. The two remaining apartment parcels will virtually l>e left 'undevelopable" because of their size and location. The owners were aware of the Foothill Specific Plan and knew someday in the future a single major developer would come along, pay a fair price and remove the old buildings. My problem (comer lot) is a little bi[ more unique. We believe if you approve the plan and leave out the three smaller parcels at the north end of the project; (1) d will t>e going against your own plan for the sfte, (2) not remove the blight already on the site and (3) not albw smooth traffic and pedestrian flow for all the possible developments for the site. In addition, we believe we are the victim of circumstances between the CKy and Smith's Food King. First of all, Smith's agreed to purchase elf of our properties at a price Smith's fart was fair and equitable, then Smith's told us they couldn't buy the property because it was to expensive and the City would not let them davebp it as they were led to believe. SmAh's though they could get redevelopment funds and/or build a larger developmeM...and since neither one happened Smith's claimed they could not use our properties for economic reasons. Smith's knew about the City's Foothill Specific Plan and the wishes of the City. Evidemly Smth's now believe, very confidently, that they can now proceed wKh their development without having to honor their commitment and purchase the entire block es per the guidelines of the Foothill Specific Plan. The losers will be the City, its citizens, the immediate neighborhood and of course the property owners who were led t0 believe in Smith's and the City guidelines as approved in the Foothill Specfic Plan. This whole block is the western gateway to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 'rf this project is approved as su>mitted, R doesn't seem to meet the standards (Foothill Plan) which took several years to study, review, revise numerous times and finally QOQ~Ei$ ~-K ~ receive the stamp of approval 6y atl the citizens and staff of Rancho Cucamonga. If Smith's plan is approved wRhout incorporating our three parcels we believe the following will occur; (1) Smth's will not be meeting the standards and guidelines of the Foothill Specific Plan (2) According to Smith's they now do not have to complete the purchase our property.., because tt is too expensive and the City feels their project is acceptable in IigM of the Foothill Specfic Plan. (3) The three property owners gave the City and Smith's the opportunity to proceed with the development for the sRe as THEY WISH... we allowed Smith's to "fie up the property' for over 1 t/2 years (4) Smith's falling three property owners the City is at tauR because of their unreasonable restrictions (5) The blight left after the Smith UevelopmeM will probably be there forever (5) Very difficult to effectivey develop remaining parcels and incorporate them with the Smith devebpmeM (7) All the other property owners were able to salt and rose escrow with Smith's because bl them. The City will get a major developer for the sde. Remaining property owners are the real ktsers. They're left with trying to develop a commercial sde that even Smith's say is not economically viable. If Smith's does not think it's worth developing, then who will. The blight will remain literally forever. Is that what the City wants? Reoartllna Prior n°°rovat Q southwest Corner yt_r~rd ~ ~r eernardtno Roads I personally feel betrayed and tricked into entering imo a purchase/option agreement with Smith's in early 1991. I Q(Q il4S want to seN the property as I spent untold hours and a lot m money to begin devebping the ske, ff was made very clear to me that if I did not enter into a k'xMVaG with Smflh's for the comer...they would look for other sites and would not buy the two aae parcel which I was in partnership with two othar irNestors. I did receive a fair otter from Smith's and decitled to sell the comer. After attending numerous meetings with the City regarding the Foothill Specific Plan end realizing the City's wishes and desires, I feR the only viable solution for the project bounded by Foothill, vineyard, San Bemerdino and the Flood Cornrol District... would be to find a single major deveoper. Smith's seemed to be the perfect answer for everyone, including all the property owners. I knew ff Smith's was the single developer for the whole site everyone would be happy and satisfied. QQ(P~6 i 3 n ~~/n tl When I first pulled the building permR for my corner site I had several serious buyers who wculd purchase the property and move their business onto the site. I had a couple of retail outlets looking for a long term lease (10+5+5 years) which would have been good for ma. Prior to signing the final agreement with Smith's I met with City officials to make sure that my building permk could remain active until the decision with Smith's occurred. The City was extremely helpful antl assisted me while at the same time allowing Smith's suffident time to do their studies on the site. It was in the best interests of the City, Smith's Food Kng and mySaM to see that the Smith project goes forward. In the early part of 1992 my building permit had expired and I was not able to proceed with construction because of my contract with Smith's. I was assured by Smith's everything was going along okay and escrow would dose as scheduled. September came and wem without escrow dosing. To this date I have never received a letter from Smith's indicating their desires not to purchase my property. Just prior to September 1, 1992 I was informed by Smith's realty consuftant...they didn't know what Smith's was gdng to do. No one would give me a reason or talk to me about my property. I called Smith's Food IGng several rimes for darfication. No one at Smith's would talk to me. They kept referring me to a COnsuRam in Texas, Mr. Larry bang. Mr. Iaarrg has always been very nice and would talk to me, but he didnR have the final say 50. I am now left with my original parcel, lost two years of marketing and at least three potential sales, all permits have expired, and I fats another possible uphill battle to reinstate my original project with plans, reviews, additional expenses and public hearings! This is not whet I had in mind when I agreed to contract with Smith's. As indicated early everyone, except the leftover three property owners, gets what they want...Smith's, City of Rancho Cucsurwnga and the other property owners who were fortunate to have their property inducted in a specfic plan that called for the entire development to be under the control OF A SINGLE DEVELOPER! I am requestlng that you adhere to your previous goals laid out in the Foothill Specific Plan, and whoever devebps the site indude ;~j DfOD8fYt8s within >Jjg aforementlonetl bountlaries. k makes for good sound planning. Smith's has already indicated they do not want the three properties because it will not make any economic sense. Why is that? Together (City, Smith S Property Owners) we need to resolve the matter for all concerned. I look forward to your comments and will be at the public hearing on the 9th of this month to answer any questions you might have regarding this letter. Sincerery yours, Edward R. Combs, Owner 8009 vineyard Avenue (714)•985-5994 residence C0,~266 N ,_7, RESOLUTION NO. { a.I - 0/ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CI/CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING, CONDITIONAL VSfi PERMIT N0. 92-10, TNfi DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER CONSISTING OP A 75,000 SQUARE FOOT GROCERY STORE, TWO SATELLITE BUILDINGS OP 3,500 SQUARE FEED EACH, AND A DRIVE-THRU PAD OF 4,800 SQUARE FEED ON 10.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COM!@RCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNEA OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEABOF - APN: 207-102-03, 5, E, 15, 20, 21, AND 49. A. Recitals. (i) Smiths Food S Drvg Tae filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Uee Permit No. 92-18 ae described in the title of this Resolution. He minafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Uae Permit request ie referred to ae "the application," (ii) On the 9th day of December 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Ncamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. On December 1E, 1992, a subsequent public hearing was conducted and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Re sOluii on No. 92-151 the reDy recommending to this City Council that said application he denied. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On Sanuary 20, 1993r the City council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that dots. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of ihie Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it le hereby found, da to rlodned, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows: 1. This Council hereby ape cifica lly finds that all of the Eacte set forth in the Recitals, Pert A, of ihie Resolution era true and correct. 2. Based upon aubetantial evl8ence preeented Lo ihie Council during the above-referenced ,7snuary 20, 1993 public heating, including written •tafE reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Cosmll seion aeeting, and the contents of Planning Cammieaion Resolution Nc. 92-151, ihie Council ha reby sped Eically finds ae follows: Q®~26~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLVTION NO. CVP 92-18 DENIAL - SMITH'S January 20, 1993 Page 2 (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Fcothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with a street frontage of 770 Feet along Foothill Boulevard and a lot depth of 780 feet on property zoned Community Commercial. The proposed site is composed of several par^els and is presently improved with a vacated roller rink and restaurant, a free-standing vacated restaurant and associated parking lot with landscaping, and a one-story, wood-framed residence; and (b) The properties to the north of the subject Bite are partially vacant and developed with two apartment buildings, the property to the south consists of vacant property south of Foothill Boulevard, the property to the east ie Commercial east of Vineyard Avenue, and the property to the west is the Cucamonga Channel) and (c) The application contemplates the development of a 75,000 square foot grocery store, two sate111te buildings (B 6 C) comprised of 3,500 square feet each, and a drive -thru pad conaiatinq of 4,800 square feet: and (d) The application, ae proposed, xould be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Coda and the FooN111 Boulevard Spe ciflc Flan for the following reasons: (1) The architecture end related design elements within the proposed project, as reflected in this application, are not consistent with the goals, policies, and design guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Spe clfic Plan which states iha following: 1) In Section 4.5.1, that vehicular traffic through adjacent residential streets ehnll be minimized; 2) In Section 8.2.2, that Activity Center parking lots dominating the street scene are ape cifically prohibited and auto-related facilities (i.e., working bays, storage, etc.) shall be screened or oriented awny from public views, but ldinge shall he aired and designed to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and cervitt areas which interfere with the flux of Foothill Boulevard pedestrian movemente7 3) In Section 8.2.5, that in Activity Center locations, the parking erase shall be located to the rear of building; and 4) In Section 9.4.3, that parking lute between the front property line and major structures are strongly discouraged; and (2) The design of the Smith's store, as groposed, provides loading dock fact litiee on the ea et and west aides of the stare Nhich face Foothill Bou?evard snd are, therefore, inconsistent with the design of other major sups rmarkete in poncho cvcamonga which front onto major thoroughfares. The location and orientation of loading facilities era typically provided along the rear elevatlone of grocery stores and/or shopping centers to conceal delivery activity from public view, particularly in en area which is considered to 6e a major gateway into the western section of the City; and (3) The location of the loading docks create potentially dange roue vehicular conf litre between truck and car traffic within the pa rkinq lot. In addition, such a potentially danga roue and confusing traffic pattern within the parking lot could ba hazardous to pads etrians entering and exiting the store; and aoozss CITY COONCIL AESOL[TfION N0. CUP 92-18 DENIAL - SRITR'S January 20, 1993 Page 3 (4) Truck traffic along San Bernardino Road and truck ingress/egress from and to this street, which i9 proposed by the project site design, is undesirable to existing residences along both aides of the street. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will to detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or mterially Snjurious to propertlas of Smprowmnte in the vicinity; and (c) That the proposed use deem not comply with each oP the applicable provisions to the Dewlopmnt Code and Foothill Boalsverd Specific Plan. 5. The City Council of the Ciiy of Rancho Cuwmongn hereby deniee the application. 6. This Council hereby provides notlca to 6mith~e Food and Druq that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution moat be sought is gow rned by the provisions of Ca1lEornia Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of %ncho Cucemonge Se hereby directed to: (a) ca rtify to the adoption of this Rawlution, and (b) forthwith irenemit n certified copy of thi^ Resolution, by certified mil, return-receipt requested, io Sm1th~• Pood and Dzug at the address Sdentiflsd in City records. Qlill~J Ul'1'Y Vf' KANUHU CUUAMUNCiA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ' FROM: Brad Bu Ller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATLVE TFACf td 116 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a residential subdivision of 19 single family lots on d.09 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located south of Highland Avenue, west of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 1076-bt-03. Aasociabid with this application is Tree Removal Permit 91-27. TIOII The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract 1d 116 through adoption of the attached Resolution. AB94MCf This item is being appealed by Council Member Rex Gutierr82, who has expressed concern with the circulatier. pattern along the northern portion of the project site and with the number of late at the end of Santa Clara Court. BAC61a78ND On September 14, 1988, the William Lyon Company submitted a proposal for a 21-lot custom lot subdivision which consisted of a circulation pattern with three ea et-west oriented Cul-de-Baca. This subdivision was a part of a master plan approved by the Planning Commission in April 1986 with Tract 12952, located inmediately to the west. The master plan illustrated a proposed loop street connecting to Highland Avenue (sae Exhibit ^H"). The northerly cul-de-sac of Tract 14116 (San Mateo place) was deai fined to be approximately 770 feet in length. Bteff responded to the applicant that their proposal was inconsistent with the City policy which limited cul-de- sac length to 600 feet, unless specifically approved by the Fize District. The two southerly cul-de-sacs had lengths of 535 feet end 24C feet and were not affected by the 600-foot limitation. The applicant did meet with the Fize District and chose not to pursue the tract design with three cul-de-sate because alternative deai fins were possible that did not conflict with the 600-foot policy. The second proposal was submitted an April 17, 1991. This proposal consisted of 19 Lots wish the street connecting San Mateo place to O~Q~r % U CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TT 16116 - WILLIAM LYON COlffANY January 20, 1993 Page 2 Highland Avenue. Through a series of neighborhood meetings and the Design Review process, the proposal was redesigned to provide a loop street between San Mateo Place and Santa Barbara Place and to eliminate the connection to Highland Avenue. Three lots have been located at the end of Santa Clara Court as indicated in all previous proposals. The Planning Co:mai sai on approved the final design on December 9, 1992. ASALYSIS The appeal of the tract deai gn is two fold: 1. Number of Iota at the end of Santa Clara Court: The apps llent, as well as neighboring residents, believe that the provision of three lots at the end of the street would create parking problems, as well as an excessive annum of rnncrete driveways at the end of the street. They also believe thnt ii would be inconsistent with other cul-de-sate in the neighborhood. The lot size of the three lots in question are consistent with those in the neighborhood in terms of square footage, but due to their location et the end of the cul-de-sec have lot Frontages at the minimum allowed for the district (30 feet). 2. Street Circulation: Residents, as well as the appellant, would prefer to have the original project design (three cul-de-lace) rather than the loop street configuration. The residents feel as though this would maintain and preserve the character of the existing neighborhoods. DISCOSSIO~ In discussions with the applicant, they have indicatad a willingness to proceed with the original at re et confiqurat_1on. In order to approve this concept, however, the City Council would have to modify the existing policy and ozdSnance regarding maximum cul-de-sec length. Following ie a discussion of the intent and background of that particular policy: Cul-De-Sac Policy On February 7, 1990, the City Council heard and adopted by minute action a report on current Clty standards for street width, length, and access relative to the operation of emergency vehicles presented by the Pire Chief and the City Engineer. The particulars of the 600 foot length Sa best explained Ln the attached copy of the staff report (8xhibit D). The report reiterates a Foothill Fire Protection District requitement contained in their Ordinance No. 10 adopted Merch 13, 1986 and also in tha City's General Plan (6xhibit E) that cul-da-sacs 000271 CITY COUNCIL STAPF REPORT TT 14116 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY January 20, 1993 Page 3 should not exceed 600 feet in length. Specifically, the Ordinance does not permlt cul-de-sacs in excess of 600 feet unless two points of access aze provided or a turf-blocked emergency access is constructed. In order for the City Council to allow a cul-de-sae in excess of 600 feet, Ordinance No. 10 would have to be amended as well as the policy in the General Plan regarding cul-de-sac length. Since the approval of the report by City Council, staff's position hoe Deen that cul-de-sac streets shall not exceed 600 feet in length, except when it can be demonstrated that the property owner will not have reasonable use of his property due to extreme physical constraints as agreed to by the planning, Engineering, and Fire Departments. In those cases, same form of mitigation will be required. Staff can recall only one instance that the 600-foot length was exceeded. The project is located north of Hillside and east of Beryl Street (Tract 14644 - nee Exhibit "I"). IL is an extenelon of a County approved subdivision bounded by existing residential property to the north and west and the Demena Channel to the south and east. This item was advertised ae a public hearing in the Inland Ve11eY Daily Bulletin newspaper, the si te has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owner s within 300 feet of the project alts, ne well ee to those in attendance at the neighborhood meetings. l ly~ ~/Rej~s]pec~t f u ubmitted, ~ Brad Buller City Planner BH:BN:mlq Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Appael Exhibit "B" - planning Conmieeion Staff Report dated December 9, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commiealon Resolution 92-146 Exhibit "D" - City Council Staff Report dated January 22, 1990 Exhibit "E" - Exeerpt from City's Gena[al plan Exhibit "P" - Ordinance No. 10 Exhibit "G" - Planning Commlesion Minutes dated December 9, 1992 Exhibit "H^ - Master plan for Tract 12952 Exhibit "I" - Site plan for Tract 14644 Cul-De-Sec Reeolutlon Approving Tentative Tract 14116 oQll4r I.~+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: IROM: SUBJECT: DacamDer 21, 1992 Debra J. Adana, City Clark ~ 1I, pea Gutierret, City Council Mambar~ APPEAL OF PLAmNIRD COlDIIBEIOR DECIEIDN TEmTATIVE TMCf 14116 I wLh to appeal the conditions o! approval o! Tsntetive TrsM 14116 with regards to number of lots and lot conflquration et tba and of Santa Clara court and street circulation pattern of San Mateo Place end Santa Eerbara Place. RG/yu RECEIVED JITr OF RANCNO CUCMID<,'^ CITY CLERK DEC 21 1992 171 EI91101llIPtI 11u5; 91516. - mk1.L~Yar - CITY ~NNIIA ~ ~VISICf~ N~~ DEC ~8~ ~ 7 1sm,nlrcal2-s,~ls .. nU OOtD273 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ «k STAFF REPORT TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner ' HY: Beverly Niaaan, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EN"JI RCNMHNTAL ASBESSMENT AND TBNTATIVR TPACT 1d 116 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A reaidentlal subdivision of 19 single Family lots w d.09 acres of land ie the Law Nedium Residential District (d-8 dwelling units per acrs ), located souU of Highland Avenue, asst of the Deer Creek Chancel - APN: 1076-61-03. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 91-27. Staff recommends Seeuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. PROJHCT AND SITE DBHCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by applicant: Approval of the subdivision map and conceptual grading pleas and Seeuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. B. project Density: d.6 dwelling units par acre. C. Surrounding Land Dw and Zoning: North - Tract 1]890 (under construction): Loa Residential District (4-8 dvalling unib per acre) South - Deer Creek Channel: Loa Nadium Residential District (Victoria Community Plan) East - Deer Creek Channel: Low Medium ReeiMntial District (Victoria Coo•::nity Plan) Weae - Tract 129521 Low Msdlum Msidsntial District (4-S dwelling unib par acre) D. General Plan Daoim:ations: Project Site - La Medium Msidantial North - Loa Medium Rssidantlal South - Medium Wsldantisl East - Plood Control/Utility Corridor Neat - Low Medium iueldentlal z. Site Charac^eristlcu The sib slopse from north to south at approxia:etsly 5 percent. The vacant e1b contains 11 trees and scrub vegetation. Tha site is not part of the Victoria Planned Cormunity. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project le a subdivision only - no houu dstlgne are proposed at this time. Ths iota range in sirs from 5,000 to 12,20] ~-X~ttOtt ((6(( PLANNING COMMISSIOA dTAFF REPORT Tf 1st 16 - WM. LYON COMPANY oecember 9, 1992 Page 2 square feet and average 7,006 square feet in area. The minimum net and minimum average lot sizes exceed the requirements of the Low Medium Residential District which are 5,000 and 6,000 square feet respectively. B. Neighborhood Heating: The project an originally proposed consisted of 19 lots but had a different street configuration which connected San Mateo Place to Highland Avenue and provided a cul de sac at the end of Santa Barbara Place (ate IDchibit "A"). A neighborhood meeting was conducted on the original subdivialon on November 1B, 1991. At that meeting, the residents expressed concern regarding the through connection to Highland Avenue (aae Hxhibit "B" for the list of attendees). In response to the concerns of the residents, the applicant redeai gnad the project to elimimte the eomnetion to Highland Avenue. A revised project consisting of 20 iota was presented et a second neighborhood meeting on March 3, 1992. The minutes from the meeting and a list of attendees is provided in Hxhibit "C." The reaidanta had concerns regarding the number of lots at the end of the Santa Clara cul de sac and felt that parked cars and increseed traffic and congestion would present a problem. They also indicated they Mould prefer to have a park at the end o[ the street and generally felt that eM number of iota proposed aae excessive. The applicant has revised the layout state Na Let neighborhood meeting by eliminating one Lot (per DIC re co®andation) shish eliminated the flag lots et the end of San Mateo Plate: however, the number of lots at the and of the Santa Clara cul de 6ac aae not revised. C. Design Review Cossaittae: The Design Awiaw Cooittee (MCNiel, Ch trite, }:routil) approved the original tree[ layout (witlf the connection to gighland Avenue) on September 19, 1992, with the following conditlons~ 1. The theme Mall along Nlghland Avenue should wrap around the corner adjacent to the channel and terminsta at the southerly property Lina for Lot 0. 2. The remainder of the wall along thn Deer Creek Channel should be consistent with the existing call adjacent to the chsnnei. 3. A trail connection to the future Dear Creak Regional Trail should ha provided at iha end of Santa Barbera Place. The details of the trail dmsl9n, and ahetMS or not the trail landscaping will M main[ained Ln a Landscape Mainisnanca District, should W datarminmd by the City Hnginmmr and City Plsnnar. Landseaps plans indleaeing tM trail end surrounding aall• should be reviewed and approved by the City Planner end City Hnglnser prior to recordation of tM find msp. 00(1275 ~ p: ~ `Y PLANNING COMM LSSIOb .iTAFF REPORT TT 14116 - WM. LYON COMPANY December 9, 1992 Page 3 4. The details of removing and replacing the existing westerly perimeter wall should be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. Since the firer Design Review Co®ittee meeting, the project was revised to eliminate the through connection to Highland Avenue because of concerns of local residents as noted above. The revised project rae reviewed by the Dealgn Review Committee (Valletta, Teletoy, Coleman) on March 5, 1992 and Lhey did not approve the project in this configuration and directed staCE and the applicant to work together to reeolw the following iseuee prior to Planning Cot®iaelon review: a. The number of flag Lots et the end o! the knuckle at San Nateo Place and Santa Barbara Place should be reduced. b. A shared driveway should bs utilised between two o[ the three lots et the end of San Mateo Place. The applicant submitted revised plane to staff which eliminated one of the flag loU ai the end of the knuckle at San Mateo Place and Santa Barbara Place. Convent No. 2 of the Design Reviar Committee has been added as a Condition of Approval. D. Trails Advisory Casittee: Bacauee of the location of the project, which abuts a fuLUta Regional Trail along Deer Creek Channel, the proposal rae reviewed by the Treile Advisory Com:ittee. The Co®ittee originally reviewed the project on May 15, 1991, and recd®ended a trail wnnaction to Deer Creak Channel. The Co®ittea reviewed the revised project on tebruery 19, 1992, and reco®ended that a 20-foot ride psseo troll connaotion ba made somewhere between LoU 6-13 to the Cutura Desr Creek Regional Trail. StaCC informed the CaamLLttea thst there ere several existing Pasco trolls rhich link nalghborhoods on the west side of the Deer Creek Channel to the future Regional Troll. At the last neighborhood meeting, residents aggasUd Chet the trail connection be made at the end of Banta Clare Court. Nwwsr, this could be Lao close to an existing erall connection at the end of Sonora Place Isae Exhibit "D"). The davsiopes tus proposed the trail connection at tM end of San Mateo Place (sss Exhibit "B"). E. Tree Removal Yermlte Associated with the project Se the request to remove 11 multi-trunkad Mountain Mahogany. Ths trees are subject to the tree nplacamant criteria o[ Ordinance 19.08. Pertinent conditions haw bean included in the attached Resolution at Approval. Technical Mviw Cosmdttae: The Technical Mview Committee reviewed the original proposal on September 13, 1991, and the revised proposal on March d, 1992. The nvissd proposal was approved subject Co the pertinent wndltlons Sn the attached Resolution o[ Approval. C~0~12'76 11 ~,a1, PLANNING COMM IS SIOh oTAFP REPORT TT 14116 - M1. LYON COMPANY December 9, 1992 Page 4 ,. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the original proposal on September 17, 1991, and the revised proposal on Match 3, 1992. The revised project was approved subject to the conditions noted in the Conditions oP Approval. Environmental Aeaeasment: Part I of the Initial Study Ma been completed Dy tM applicane. Staff has capleted Part II of tM Environmental Checklist and determined that the project could adversely affect tM environment Mcauae of LM tree removal. However, tree replacement Sa required as a mitigation: therefore, the project will not Mve a significant Smpact on the environment. PACTS POR PINDINGS: The project is rnnalstent with the Genetal plan and the cevelopment Code. The project, rich tM added mitigation msasurea, will not be detrimental to the public Malth or eatery, or cause nuisances or significant sdversa environmental SmpaCU. In eddltlon, the proposed use and cite plan, together with !ha rsco~andad Conditions of Approval, are in cosWlianca rith the applicable provisions of tM Development Code and Clty standards. CORRESPONDENCE: This item Ma Dean advertised a• a ptblic hearing In the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, tM property Des been posted, and notices Mva bean giant to all property awnsra within 300 feet of the project site, as well a• to those k attendance at tM Neighborhood meetings. RECOMHLRiDAT ION: Staff recoveends Chat the Planning Coolssion approve Tentative Trace 14116, eubj act to iM Conditions of Approval, thswgh adoption of the attached Resolution and Saeuanca of a mitigated Negetlve Declaration. Reap y eu Bra ar City lemma[ BB:BN ap Attachmanta: Exhibit "A" - Original Tract Layout Exhibit "H" - Liat of AttenMes tram Neighborhood muting of November 1B, 1991 Exhibit "C" - Nlnutss from March 1, 1992 Neighborhood meeting Bxhiblt "D" -Trail Connection Exhibit "E^ - Proposed Tnct Layout Exhibit "!" - S1G DtlliEatian Map Bxhlblt "G" - Gndinq plan Exhibie "H" - Tres Removal Plan Rewluelon of Approwl with Conditions ~Q!!'s7+~ 11 ~v~ll ~~~ ~~~~~ F~~:r ~ ~ cep- -~_~.,_.~___'__y _•_;~ s- ~~,'~~I~ ~` y y `.' r *. - LAN ~ - ,: ~ ~ ~' t- --- `~° © °E n~,~ ~, . _.. ;P .,.. .. i - ~, , f e , i ~ ~~ .'~; '~~ ~ ,~, i~ i ~ ~' +, ,~' . ~!~ iii' ~- I i; 'i ~~ 1 ~' `'~' ~.X~tiblt "~" o2i~~aa~. TP-,ACr 1.AYOr~r rV~rGrf1' ao>7 ~ ~TI'iwl6 __-- / I/-lP'9~ 7+b ~M ~n~ ~ ~~,~~,~ ~~~,~.,~,.,~~, cam-- ~~y-9~.-~3~~ ~/ ~JL~. ~--J ~r Gd~) s~ ~ i f/~F~ PnP~ ~' Ct~ I /~~ / C~C "~5~~ iQ ~/a.r/ /J~,~-~ ~~//~~ ~n tel. / R ~ ~N ON~^ Lc~. , 7I7D/ ~i'i¢1f/LEl~/ /Y~oiPiPls ~nuv»tf- ~, ~...c~- ~093~ SA•v /YJrStIEd .dL.9c~' ~G~i9 L.oMA C.'9 9,70/ ~~i~> pe~~- o0 6Y ~ Y~c~,lll~...1s~c~ c4~1.r~ ~K.~,a+ nk~~~.+ c..~ ~z~~l/91 -fv ~;.,~.~,. ~4t^.~..,,. ~Ic,~.,f L..~ l.:w ~,.e{..,c{.r~ ~k,a cCF..-e~~,r iv ~a~.on~~ vn'+C..,,..~ c:~,,.,«.{~,~ mac-.,. ~k w~eo +o ~;~.nc~ ~cG.a Iv n¢i~4D.vcw.e0 e~vc;h~on ~ -1,z.FC~•c. Ilp~~[ II NFa6H~oR•tloo~ Mrfx. ',~~t61q.1 ~X}tIDIT `~ ~'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 1992 T0: Brad Buller, City planner ~q-v1 PROM: Beverly Nissen, Aeeoelata Planner SUBJECT: MINUTBB PROM NIIGABORNOOD Ma3T IND - TilITATIy6 TMCT 16116 (NLLLIAN LYON) - A rseidentiel subdivision of 20 single family lots ao a.09 scra o! lend Sn the Low-Nediua Rssidentlal District (hs dwelling unite per acre), located south of Nl9hland Avenue, we:a of the Daez Creak Chamal - APN: 1076-61-03. The second neighhborhaod racing Cos this project vas conducted ~oo Tuesday, March 3, 7992 at 7:70 p. /. The attsndw (sw attached list) reviewed the revised subdivision laywC and had CM Collowinq concerns: 1. Tha use of existing stzrb !or conseructlm traflLc thrwgh the existing single fasdly nefghbochaod wr a concern. 2. Concern ngardinq crospatibility o! new hors with tba existing hors wr expnred by the reeihnta. Staft responded ehae tM how wen not being procuaed Cor approwl at this tlr and eMt this true would M rerLwed hY the plats inq Corlsalm at a later data Then a Drign Review applicetlon wr subsltted. 3. Reeidenq exprrrd ooMezn regarding the nutlet of house at the end of the 9apta Clara cul-davae. They felt u thwgh parked ears rwld present a preDlq u wall a inerrrd nair, trat[ie and congeatlon. TM residents lndtubd ehae they were eels by clay Butt Sn tM pre ehae tMre would be M dewiopwt at eM end o! their wl-da-sac and they felt ihai the secant o[ lots propred yr exenaiw. TMy would prefer to ar a park at tM end of the eul-da-sae. 8tatt indicagd Nat the residents should addrrs [heir corenes to the Planning Coriulan both !n psnon a well as by Letar. Ne also Lndicated to the zrldanb that their concerns rou ld b tncludsd in the stet! report and that they would M Mulled of Cho date o! the rating. BN: mlq Attachrnt C-0~280 ° tb.ls'. ~X~rro~r c-i ~l~-i -~t+eoR~op mTb• NEl 6 H ~p(ztI oo!- ~-1E. - i ~ti i ~ -t ~ ~ e 5~ EaN t9P sH~~T 3~ 3~q 2.. pah O~G~s~m~ U ~,4TSy,urnt~iS /012 .Tg•~.~ Eo P[. 9 Y-~.~~~ ~Grly /T~il.Yfdi.Jce'C- /B%r/9 cf'q.J Mw~/'A'o PL l"S~/-/3yf' n~IJ~C~ ~ YYlar~ ~~ I ~~~~. R89~6 8~ ~~o -/ • pE ux i/v.~ sN.~•~ ~- p~nv Cor~,C.~ 9`~ 169P 000281 ~.~Qfil dtrG '~' u ~.~ ~~ ~- HIGN LA,. D f~~. •w°` mrcr rwcr >a~ ~ .. ~ T ,~ ,~ 5~; ~~ ro. ~~ ~ ' ~ ea iW~t iRMT ro. ro. xo. 41 ~ ~Ct ~~~ r i . I 9171 IIfi06 I i~ iR. ~ 7RCT iRMi (.~/ 10 A _~ ~ ~ ~ IA ~ ~' ~ 7„N1G_ ~ y `i ~_ Ilf~-~ ro. ra. uoss no. G~N't~cL~ ~ ' 1 ' ~~ mrcr ® no. I~ll9 ` " ,~1L ~~ CITY OF t~AlyCt'-fCf.,~UCAMONGA PLANNING DMSION N EXHIBfC: fl SCALE: OOR;~S2u ~,~N !~ ~- a~, ..._. ~ ~ . ,a..~.. ~.. y 4. w~ V _ Cam' ~ ®M DL ® I'"w ~.,,. - _ ~ ,_--"""_~ s ,~~/~~~~ ~, ~ u i ,w iS ~I~i"11 `~ ~ ~ .n ;iF'. ..,. ..., y b~ ~ i iN -~_~ • ,j1 n, I ~ -u as ~ Ep!!ie ~ ~ ,;~ :~ .- ~ I,, r''~u 0~~12F3 ~ ~ „~ ~XHI~bIT u~" P8opo5iA rR>AGr I.I~boT x ~~ ~OR-RII~QL s • ~»coa~r ~,., \ Y 6 ~,.,~•~', I 1M~ ~~~*i_ ^'~ 4i ~~-~ ,,~, -~ ~~ 1 ,~ t (1 - ^4 L ,^ = - T v I, i~s t a "^~' ~ ~ x Z ~~.i~`_ 4~ -_~_: JrL, i ~~. r -\/. ice. W'' %~_ F- ; L fZvG?,'~4 ~ = i T) str~ uTtuzA~noN r~nP ~XktlbiT ~~~u n ~7~l0" ~~~ ~-~ `7 g~ rx~. ~.yt `ly ~ n SIE~~ -1-- ;=1-3a ~n ~~ ---- ~ - ~. ~: 4~G~$ s - - - - -.. ~_ ;~ z ls7 a G7 / _--- , ~ 1 ~~ ~. y 5' pp c ~' ~,~ jji ~;lii n , ~ ~l~ N~ i ' ~I~ _ r 1, is ;~i~ ~ ~: ,~ /~= ~~~ ~_ 'w / ~~ ill b 1.[~' ~, -a ~ i i. • 1 :•, ~ ~ j; ~; ~` ii~~~ 1'1. . ~ % .~~ aI YID U`a 9 ! ~ Ii, iii ~;" p .x i~ l I,,,f EXHIBIT "G1~1 CaPa4DW6 RAN ~5 ~°~: ~ I P ~y -~ ~ Y~ „~ ~l~:: ®. ~. '~ ' i lil~ _ -Qs ~~ ! i ,y .~ ~" b ,, i~,: ~:tl~: i i i 'E_.. ,,,~,~I. j s C ' i ~ ~ 3 4 ~ i •1 4 , u~,~u ~X~I~'`T 'N" TRt~ REMovar, pr_gN R690LUTSON NO. 92-145 A RESOLUTION OF 'fte PLANNING COIOII SSION OP THI CITY O7 RAIICNO CUCAMONGA, C1IL SF0PNSA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACE NAP NO. 11116 A pE3IDENT2AL SUBDIVISION OF 19 SINGLE PANILY LOT9 ON 4.09 ACRES OT LAND IN TH6 LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DIS?RICT (6-8 DNELI,ING VNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTA Ol HICHI.AND AVENUE, N63T O- TH6 DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MARINO BINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOT - APNs 1076-61-03. A. BadGla. (1) William Lyon Coaq;any has tiled an application !ot the approval of Tantat Lve Tract Map No. 14116 a deaerlbad In Che title of thL Resolution. Hereinafiez in thin Maolution, CM aub3eeL Tentative Tract Map request ie referred !c a "Ue application.' (SS) On tM 9th day of Oecead»z 1991, the Plannl~y Co®Saaion o[ the City o! Rancho Ncaeonga conducted a duly noticed public Aearinq on tM application and concluded acid hearing on that date. (lil) All legal prerequiaitee prior to eha adoption of foie Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, TFRAEPCRt, it 1• hereby found, deGClalMd, and resolved Dy eha PLnnlnq CommLSlon of the City o[ Rancho Cuesawnga a follows: 1. Thie CtxnLelon ner.by apeeifically find. tMt •11 0! tAe Lets eet forth Ln the ReriLL, Part A, o[ tAL Rnolui ion are tcw and correct. 3. Bub upon substantial evldenq pruented Lo thL Cammiuicn during tM abovrrsferueed public Haring on December 9, 1997, Lncludinq writun and oral sG!! reports, together with public teat lawny, thl• CaussLsion Mnby spseltieally finds a lollow~ (a) The application appllss to progtty located south of Highland Avenue and wst o! Dwr Creek Channel with • street frontage of JJO feet .long H1gAlud Avenw and lot depeh of 730 tee! and L^ pruently vacant; and Ibl The pcopsrty io LM north o! the subject •lU L a •inq le family resldsntial developnwnt under eonstrucelon, eM property to CM south o[ coat •iu eonelsu of •ingls [mnily realdential devslopsenc, tM property to ehe cue i• ehe Deer Creek Chanml, and the property to ehe wet is a single tsmlly residential dswlopmsntl and (e) The proyaet, with CM acoaswnded Conditions o! Approval, compiles wleh all dswlopment standards of tM City o! Mneho Cucuanga. Q0fD2b'7 ~iXkli'jlt" uGr PLANNING COMM255ION IOLUTION NO. 32-:~10 TT 1x116 - WILLIAM L.JN COMPANY December 9, 1993 Page 2 3. Saeal upon the eubetantial widencs presented to [hL Commiuion during eN above-nGrencal public hearing and upon tM specific findings of Eaet• set fotth in paraqupha 1 and 3 above, this Commiulon heteDy finds and concludes a follows: (y Tha bnUtive ergot is consLWnt with the General Plan, Dwelopmsnt Code, and specific plane; and (D) TM design or improvemwnt• of the tentative tract are consLStent with tN General Plan, Development Cod., and spec if ie plane; and {c) TM e1b U physically auitabU for tM type of dwelopment propotali and (d) The design Of tN subdivision i• not Likely to cauu substantial environmental damage and avoidabU Lnjury to humans and wildlife or ehsir habitat; and (.) TM tentative tract U not ltluly to cause orlous public health~problamq and ([) TM design of the Ungtive tract will not coot Lict with any easement acquired by the publ ie at Lrge, now of record, for aocos through ar uu o[ tM property within CM proposal wbdlvLion. 4. Thl• Cammluion hereby finds and certifies that CM project ha• bwn rwiswal and eonsldsral Ln eampllance with the Glltornla Lnvlronmentel pual ity Act o[ 1970 and, [urtMr, this Commission hereby issues • mit Lgatal NegatLve Declaration. 5. Basal upon the findings and eoneluelons set Torth in parsq= ~.s 1, 2, 7, and • above, this Caasalu ton herby approves the application cut a co uch and wary eondielon set forth Dslow and in the aetachal Stanaara Conditions attachal heHCO and LneotpOraeal herein by this rderence. Plannl 1) A shared driveway shall be utili:al between two o[ ehe three lot^ at ehe end of 9m Mateo place and Santa CLra Coutt. 3) The ehesm wall along Highland t~venue mall wrap around the cornet adjacent to the channel and urminaq at the wuCMrly properey line [or Lot 6 (l.e., the pueo trail). ]) Construct a well •lonq ehe Deer Crgk Channel from the northerly property line of Lot 7 to terminate at ehe apex of Che triangular piece K the south end o[ Lot 19. Said wall shall match the existing wall to ehe south. 000268 NCI n PL3INIIZNG CO10~SSSION : JLVTION NO. 32-iJ5 TT 1a116 - rILLIaN LYON OONPANY Deeeeber 9, 1997 Page 3 al The dataila of removing and replacing the relating westerly perimeter wall shall M reviewd and approval by the City Planner prior to tM iaauanee of grading parmita. 5) TrN iemoval Pernlt 91-27 is hereby approval euD3ect to the replaearnt of tM 11 multl- erunked Greoeatpwc cetuloLdec (Mountain Mahogany) with eM largess grown nursery atoek avallaDle. TM location and spectre eMll M aharn on eM [lnal landaeape plan to M revLerW and approved by tM City Planner prior to louanq o[ gtadinq permits. 6) The developer shall prmviG Nch procprtlw buyer written notice o[ cM /Dutch Street Rock Crochet pta3ect prior to acceptl~g • deposit on My property. 7) CroN-lot dnlncge shall M eliminatal and 111uctrstal on tM [tool gradi'p plan. e) TM walls along the wsC skis of Loge 17 and 19 should M conelnual up to a point even with the [root o[ tM houN on Lots 10 and 17 0! Tract 17957, rNgetlvely. 9) TM deGil• o[ CM connection to eM Iteglonal Tzall, and rMeMr tM trap eonneeCion Lndwaplnq will M maintained !n • Landscape MalntNanee District, sMll M deterelnal Dy the Clty Planner aal C1ty LnginNt. Wndeoaq plane LMieatlnq tM trail aM eurreualinq ra1L eMll M uvlewal and approval Dy eM City Planner and City itplneer prior eo reeordat/on o[ [M [Coal Np. i'wlneerlee Divleien 1) M !n-lieu [N ac eonerlDUCion to tM tutors undszgroundlnq of the ealNinq everMal utilities (teleeoeeunleaelons aal electrical) located on the north •Lde o[ Nlghland avenN shall M paid to tM City prior to approval o[ she Plnal Map. TM [N shall M one-Mlf tM City adoptal unit amount Close tM Ungth tram she wet pro~ece boundary to eM ceneerllN o[ DNC CrNk CMnNl. 7) Nighland AVNUe shall be conscruetal cull width lrom Trace 17957 en eM wet to Tract 13057 on QOQ289 Il p ~ ~ ll PLANNING COMMISSION iOLUTION NO. 97-.;e TT 14136 - NILLIIIM LYON COMPANY Daeambar 9, 1992 Page tM east, including the widaninq of tM bridge over Dwr CrNk Channel, in conformance aith Dravinq po. 1390. Lt tMw improvewnea us completed by the dwelopsr of Tract 13890 on tM north aide of Highland Avenue, thin dweloper shall relaburw tM Tract 13890 dwalopr [or the ccat of lmprovawnL south of the Highland Avanua cantuline for tM lwgth of the project frontage. It thin devalogr cwpletu CM lmpravamanta, M atoll M eligible for rslaburaewnt as lollowac a) Credit against and rslmbursawnt for costa in exeaae of tM Citywide Transportation owelopwnt TNe for all work wlihln tM Deer creek cMnnal righe-of-way, except landwapinq. b) TM developer may request • reiaburaapnt agreewnt to recover the cost of lmprovsmenta on ohm north Aida of tM Mighiwd Avenue centerline fronting Tract 13890 upon dwelopwnt of QMt lraK. 3) Extend tM pevawne trweltion lnatalled for CM tsaq+orary •T• intueweion of 19th acraai with Highland Avenue t0 wet CM naM lmprovewnts and install objac[ wrlure eo tM utiatact ion of tM City inginNS and :alteans. 4) Thm dwelogr shall request that the Clty appropriately prowee uN! quit elais Lot Cot Tract 12952 prier to final mop approval. 9) TM developer chaff make • good [aleh a[tort to otter tM triangular portion o! Lot 19, mouth of eM retaining wall, to CM owner of tM proprty to tM west )Lot {{ of Tract 129521. It chat owner agrees, • lot line adjuatwnt co ucompl Lh ohm tsne[er atoll W recorded prior to final mop approval. 6) Aaeonetruet CM delve approach en Lot 57 of Tract 12952 when conatruetlnq the knuckle Mewwn ltrwe ^a• and Santa OuDUa Plum. 7) Parkwq Lndeoaplnq aeroo eM Plood Control o/etsiet property eha11 W Lnetalled from eM set tract boundary to CM exletlnq nrelnue ae Treet 13057. Landaeaplnq shall traneltlon Gcween tM 19th 9crnt and Highland ~wnue Q®~' .~0 nA~~g PLANIIINO (.•O)DIIaSION JLUYION RO. 92-156 TT 1x316 -WILLIAM LYOe COI(pARy Dacasher 9, 1993 Pages 5 there and M eospat lbla with axiatinq rlood Control District Lndaeapin9, which mall M shown an LM laMaoape plans toz ra[eranca. 8) 'rha Meign of Lot A shall W conalatent with •Lilar trail connactiona to tM south. 9) Accua ramps say M raquirad on teeth aidaa of tM knuckle for eM trail eonnaetloo during plan check. 6. She lecratary to thta Comirion atoll certify to CM adoption of Lhia Wwlution. APPAOV9:0 MO ADOPTtD 'LUIS 9TA DAY O- D^CfMetll 1997. PLANIIII/O Ia3I011 Or TBf CITY O- a)111CB0 COC)1ROIIO71 r G BY: ~ I, Brad Buller, Decretary of tM Plannl~p Ca~Lalon of tM Clty of Ranoho Cucaawnga, do heretry eetti[y ChK eM toepelnq Reeolutlon wu duly and raqularly lnerodveed, paaaM, and adopted by tM Planning Coawiaaion of eM City o! Rancho Cucamolpa, at • regular maatlnq e[ tM Planning CarUalon Mld on the 9th day of OaaemDer 1997, hY tM following vote-towlt• AYIB, CdwIl820MdLLi CHITIEA, MCNIRL, IQI.CID:R, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE Moss. oaaxsuassRS~ RDRE AsassT~ cawlsslgssRS~ Monte 000291 pC~~n - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT _ ~ ~» DATE: 7avuary 22. 1990 ~ 7Q Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Russcii H. Maguire, City Engineer L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief S[JB3ECf: Rcport on Current City Standard Street Width, Leng[h wd Access Relative to the Operation of Emergency Vehicles Minimum street width Cor both public and privue rcsidevtial nrcets should be ao less than 36 feet, with vo variance allowed. CWde•sac'a in high density residential (i.e. cvadominium, apanmeat, attaehtd multi-family) areas should nor exceed 300 feet in length. wll other eWde-sac's should not exceed 600 feet iv Ievgth. Cul•de•su's iv excess of 600 feet should not be allowed and should be rcplued by a through sweet with [wo poinu of mobatrvcted 36 foot ucas. All subdivisions tracts should Gave two complete and tmobatrveted points a[ access, euh a minimum of 36 feet wide. During November of 1989, questions were directed to the City Engineering Depanmev[ and to the Frc District rcgardiag whu appwrcd to be differcacea is the interpretation sad application of tbeir respective coda as applied to street widths. Ooe specific polar of diunaaion revolved wound s project located on north Hermaaa Avenue, known u 'Tha Woods", where the street width wu permitted u 2g fact. Historically speaking;, tha Fire District hu 6ad [he responsibility of euablishiag rtrc ILe ^ea n» ^ ". standards in accordance with their Ordinance NIO and tha Engineering Departmea[ has administered tha rcgvircmenn pertaining to n till "rr~• ~ u established is the Circuluion Element of the General Plan. The fire Isae and fire ucess nanduda art, for the mou pan, applied to within commercial/iaduurial projects where [he type of constrvctian sad/ar occupancy dictue the Deed for ^ minimum 26 foot fire Jana. This width shows for the set-up of the trvck company whiles stilt loaning aoougb diitmee for another piece of emergency equipment to pw tha track. if atxded. 13ia type of procedure ii oat normally required whm combating fires is single-family type residential structures. Therefore, the minimum 36 toot public street width is sufficient for tha Fine Distriat needs. but We minimum street width must be maintained at 36 feet. ,~~ r „~„ Street Width, Length and Access January 22, 1990 Page 2 There have been some instances where a private development has keen constructed utilizing non-dedicated streets in their project. Being private streets, the width of the siren is constructed below the minimum width accepted (or public or dedicated streets. This allowable narrowing creates tactical problems for the Fire District and parking enforcement problems for the Sheri (f. The above mentioned problems are the result of narrowed street widths in who[ is normally a private, gated development where parking is allowed on both sides of the street. When considering these pdva[e streets, two areas of concern should be recognized. The first concem is aesthetics. These private streets can be pasted as fire lanes by pluiog signs every 100 feet throughout the project or the curbs coo be painted red. Neither of these will produce general public or ci[y planner appeal for aesthetic quality, Secondly, enforcement of the no parking would become difficult in a gated community, due to the lack of continued and reliable access through the gates. Even withou[ the gates, the enforcement problem would be continuous and burdensome and could, produce adverse reactions to Ne Council level on behal[ of the affec[ed rcsidena. Thertforc, these private streets should be trcued the same u Ne public street and a minimum width of 36 feet should be rtquircd. This will provide for reliable emergency accts and u Ne same time reduce the need for parking enforcement. The long dead-end, cal-de-su type street hw been found to be one of Ne most difficult to plan around initially and also to navigate later on when completed. These issues become extremely problematic wheo the cal-de-sac is proposed (or a high density dwelling project. Some of the problems that occur are Nat the rcsidena end/or visiron will not only park on both sides of the street (normally 600 feet long), but also park perpendicular to the cal-dense bulb, creating a cum-around problem for emergency equipment. WAen that ocean, it becomes necessary for the apparatus operators to back the equipment approximately 600 feet out to the nearest intersection. Even with Ne use of "bakers" (another firefighter watching the back of We unit a it moves backward) it is not an all togeNer safe prutiw. This required baking out also delays the rcaponsa of Nis unit, should it be Deeded at another emergency acne. Another item ro consider is that during en emergency at these high density projeeu, the emergency equipment will be utemptiog to use Ne swe accw io v Na rcsideeu are using to evacuate. This will become more profoundly noticeable wheo a nuunl disaster strikes and partially or completely isoluea those rcsidena living in high demity projeca oa 600 foot long ritsets. Based upon Ne foregoing information, it is to Ne advmtage of Ne emergency responders and to the residents that cui•de-su's in multi-family toning be limited in IengN to 300 feet. This will reduce the Dumber of vehicles on Ne street, reduce the backing distance ud reduce Ne potential threat of those ~~~- ooozsa ~ac~t~e~r .tp-iN Street Width, Length and Access January 22, 1990 Page 3 being isolated to one-half in comparison to the number of those currently existing on 600 foot cut-de•su's. Within the past year or so, a project was proposed which, when completed, would have tied two streets together, giving access to the project from two points. A small uprising of citizen complaint surfaced and the end result was one short cut-de-sac and another cut-de-sac approximately 1200 feet in length. It was then necessary to require an emergency ucandary access to this project in an attempt to mitigate the excessive length of the cut-de-sac. That secondary access now presents a se[ of problems on its own. The big problem is, will the access be there when we need it? !n the meao[ime, who is going to monitor and enforce its existence on a consistent buis? In the future, we should avoid creating on-going problems for ourselves by not allowing cut-de-sac's in excess of 600 feet. It would appear ;he most ezpcdicn[, cos[ effective, and aatLSt method of resolving this type of dilemma is to require through streets in plue of extended cut-de-sus. The citizen's concerns regarding traffic and aoiae is understood. but at the same time it is not taw unrealistic to believe thu the original citizen contem can tum into litiga[ian when it is found Nu a delay is response occurred due to blocked atcess, both primary (cars, parking, nuural disaster, etc.) and secondary (growth, planting, construction, etc.). Again, it is to our advantage and ultimately to that of the citizen, that cut-0a-sacs in excess of 600 feet not tx permitted in any zoning area. This uea is one which should be most euily remedial. Two points of access for tracts is required on a fairly staadud buis u this time. Again, i[ is a safety based requirement which enhances the ingress of emergency vehicles white at the same time allowing for the egreu o[ ruidenu via a upuate route. On occasion, emergency vehicles will be responding from diametrically opposing directions sod two points of uceu allows for a more rapid end direct response for both vehicles. This arcs could sand some emphasis but tar We moat pan is being handled on a fairly equitable and consistent buis throughout the city. Respectfully submitted ~''~T'~ enois Michael M. Ma 'rte / Fire Cbie( Ct LBA/ss ~ 3 oQc-zs~ ~.xµlplT "D-2" ~ENE~AL PGi~ti The future fire station locations are not now owned by the district nor is the location site specific. The depiction of a fire station is an indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. • All proposed development shallsatistythe structural fire protection standards contained in the mast recenteditions ofthe Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. All proposed development shall be adequately served by water supplies for community fire protection. All proposed development shalt meet the Foothill Fire Protection District's requirements for safe and ready access for fire and other emergency equipment. The design of roads and street systems should meet the following standards. Each development or phase of development should have at least two di}terent ingress•egress routes. - Cul-de-sacs should not exceed 600 feet and should provide a turn-around right of way not less than 90 feet in diameter, Street grades should not exceed 12 percent except for short distances where topographic conditions da not permit lesser grades. In areas designated as high fire hazard, the City and County should undertake or continue programs to minimize fuel buildup around residences and other occupied structures. Establishment and maintenance of a greenbelt or cultivated fuel break between fire risk areas and urbanized areas. The City should undertake programs to manage the intertace between light ground fuels and heavy forest fuels so that easily started fires with low burning intensity can be controlled before they have the opportunity to ignite the heavier}uels such as dense chaparral and those of the woodland areas. Such programs should include the following measures. Fire buffers along heavilytreveled roads should be created by thinning, discing, or controlled burning subject to air quality restrictions. Brush, but not woodland canopy, should be cleared from the road for 10 feet on bath sides of the road. - Firebreakprogramsinriskareaswhere there are no roads should be continued. A minimum firebreak from 30 to 100 feet should be maintained in these areas. The existing rows of eucalyptus should be topped and trimmed, and combustible and dead vegetative material atthe base should be removed. - The fire hazard posed by existing blue gum species of eucalyptus should be recognized and the feasibility of replacing these trees should be considered. • All applications fordevelopment in the fire hazard area shall include an interim fuel management program to reduce the risk of lire. The County and City shall encourage clustered developments to provide for more localized and efledive fire protection measures such as consolidation of fuel buildupabatementffrebreak maintenance, QO'~%:95 ~Xftl Prl7 "~" ORD/NANGE plO. /C ,;rbs s ;all Se r- .- _ red z^d/or acp roved `__re _..., sicds nstal'ed _„_ the lent th desicnzted :;v ..._ Foc-^ '1 .re =rctectipn District Said _icnsP s'n z:l Se instai:ed nc no:e than 100 feet apart on scads znd accessways a to 1/4 -.i le in ienyth. ..n :Dads and accessw~ays in er.cess of 1/: m.le in '_e:',yth, said sicns shall be ins=aped no nose than 200 f__t apart. I:. `°ct:.cn 10.207 c_° the uniforn Fire Code is ire re by za~e nded to add Section (c~) as follows: (ri lny^ress and Egress. in residential tract dev_1cp- .~ s and where cul-de-sac streets in excess cf 500 ~_`eet exist, two separate and distinct points of access (incress and egress) shall be provided. .nis may aiso be applied to certain industrial park developments. Ar_icle 10 of the Unifo rra Fire Code is hereby a:ne nded to add Sec tier 10.210 "Building certification". <ectio.^. 10.210. .he :ire Chief or his designate shall not certify any building or oceunancy until he is sztisfied that the zequir_ments for fire protectipn facilities have actually been constructed and provided in accordance with the an?roved plan. The develo?er sS:ali call the r^ire District for inspections related co the constrcction p'_ seta iced `ire preteccion ;.aclrc_e s. .-._] ^le 10 Of the C'^if Cr-' F1Te CO:_ '.S herei^v cC_.._..- c_ ~~,. Sec tips iC.2'_'_ ....pess Doors". ~_c .i ca 1C. 211. - cess Coors sha 11 be provided a.. -._s. Ground Leve l:.oor = fighting purposes .. -- rdaace wd ch _.._ L:.i `_ rm Build my Code. ._ sY.a 11 'c=_ at least one Goer not L=ss than 3 fee tY '_.. w doh a..d not less t.^.an 6 `_eet 2 inches in hei== . ...in zee recuired ravel d_stanc_. Travel dist_nce ..__.,_ n said Coors shall not erc e=_d 150 feet, cr - ~ trot tics t..__eof ca th=_ e>aerior ~aa11 a:':^.ich "a=as c-e access^road~.:av. (For access door r_ccirc- r.. --- _>_l= _ to .-nixed =rock, se_ tin i_c_a ____ Code,Sectio n-fi 1. 109~(b).) -.,_ a=_s_hetic reasons, safety glass (tempered class) --r.=_ls, t.e same s __ as .he access doors (3'8"x5'3"; -- be used as z su icable on:ion the r-ecc lar _~c=_ss doors. These class panels shall be narked „__ --_ =_a?repriate reflective marking symbol, =_s _ - _ by t're .___ District for e=_se of location by ____ rightiny'persorr.e1. Hetal roll-up doors are not acceptable for such purposes. All C~Q!~2`3(i Commies ioner Melc her agreed the trail should not to required on Parcel 1. mmies ioner Chit iea concurred that it would be appropriate to dale the tr '1 because iG would serve only Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 could hav direct acts to the Community Trail. .p Commies io~z Valletta agreed. ~~e Motion: Mod by Chitiea, seconded by Me lc her, to is e a Negative ^eclar at ion and adopt the reaolut ion approving Tentative Parc Map 1287'] with modif is ations to'~elete the requirement fcr a local fe er trail and to require a etatama~. on the record title regarding th applicability of Xilly ids Oevelopmant ~qulat ions. Motion cart led by Che ollowing vote: AY'E5: COHMISSIONE RS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL. MELCHER, OLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS- NONE ABSENT: COMMIS SZONERS: NE -carried • . . . . 0. CO O - - - A request Co construct a 3,283 square foot building tooter 'n ,200 square Eeet of retail apace and a 1,983 square Eoot fast food tauten[ (with drive-thru ), within a prey iouely approved conane rcial r a canter in the Regional Ra lated Commercial designer ion (Subarea ) o she Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, loceGed on Gha south si of Poo L11 Boulevard between I-16 and ECiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-0 -03 throng 13, 15, 16, 20, and a portion cE 59. Brad Buller, City Planner, ated staff had rata ed word Erom the watteon Arno Company, property o ate, that Che pto~ect~po9 ant would like to continue the matter to ow further review b the D r n Review Committee. Ae no written request d been received, he suggested tatter be continued co January 13, 1993. ' Chairmen McN iel o ed the public hearing. There were no co:mlen\\t e. Motion: Move by Melchor, seconded by Toletoy, to continw Cdl~d it tonal Oae Permit 92-2 o January 13, 1993. Motion serried by the follow in~vo<e: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNIT 2EA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLEt'TE NOEB: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~ AB T: C.OMMISS IDNERS: NONE -Carried \. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TMCT 14116 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A reeldent ial eubdiv iaion of 19 single family lose On 4.09 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential Diairic[ (4-8 dwelling unite par acre), located south of Highland Avenue, west of the Daer Creek Channel - APN: 1076-61-03. Ae aociated with ihia application ie Tree Removal Permit 91-27. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Nagai ive Declaration. Associated with Ch ie project i9 Tree ftemovel Perm i[ 92-17. 0~~297 Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 9, 1992 N /1 EXti~b',-f G Beverly Nissen, Aeaoeiate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman NcNiel opened the public hearing. Brian Austin, Will ism Lyon Company, 4490 Van Karma n, Newpo ct Beachr et ated they were in agreement with the propoeetl Conditions of approval and he urged Planning Commies ion approval of the map. He stated that Stanley Morse, the project engineer, wag present and available to answer questions. Maurice Marston, 10971 Santa Clara court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated nis property abate the wall to the east of the proposed Lot 19. He noted a Large property 1Ln¢ eh ift was shown and ha wond¢red if a largo portion of land from the now tract was to be doodad to the City. He said ha had attended the March 3, 1992, meeting and expressed his concerns about putting cores houses at the end of Santa Clara Court. He ea id he had the suppoci of a resident of Shaw Street, actoee the wash. He said they were concerned with the amount of congestion and the 30 feet of drive approach which would in effect take up almo et all of the end of the cal-de-sac. He said he had visited the City before purchasing hie lot and had been to ltl that Santa Clara Court would remain a cal-de-sac, but probably Santa Barbara Place and San Mateo Place would change. He understood Chat cal-de-seta cannot be Longer than 600 Eeet antl saitl Chat although he would like to tee no aceeee to the new tract oEf Santa Clara Court, he would be willing to support two Lots at the end of the at rest. Xe Eelt that three lots would overt rowtl the atce¢t and he felt Lhe proposed Lot 19 woultl be nn extremely irregular shaped lot. He auggeeted that he would be willing to negotiate the purchase of some of the property Erom the William Lyon Company in order to reduce the number of lo[a at the end of Santa Clara Court. Phillip Tal leer, 10961 Santa Clare Court, Rnnc ho Cucamonga ete[ed Santa Clara Court is snort with only seven houses on the at rest. He said rasidencea of three of the houses were in the audience antl the other four homeowners had expressed concern. He stated he was speaking on behalf of those not present. He said they were categorically opposed to the propeeed lot d iv ie ion. He said they woultl be willing co compromie¢ at two Loie at the end of the etr¢¢t. He felt three lore woultl b¢ intone iaient with the existing homes. Ha presented plcturea of ens ezieting homes on the scree[ and he noted ens Iota on Santa Clara Court are generally larger than the average lot• in the tract and the driveway ate Eutther away from each other with more spacing between homes. He set Lme[ed an average diet ante of 30-40 Ee¢t between the ezieting drivewnya while thre¢ driveways were proposed at the tip of the cul- de-sac which would virtually be on top of earn other with only 30 feet of frontage onto Santa Clara Court Eor each home. He envisioned the end of the cal-de-sec with mainly concrete and very little room for lantl ecaping and stated that would be ineonaiatent with Che remainder of the street. He felt the atld it Tonal three homes would create excessive traffic congestion and heavily impact packing becau as there would be no parking available in Eront of the three homes at the end of the cal-d¢-sac, H¢ thought the addition of homes would not improve th¢ appearance of the at rest and woultl negat ivaLy impact the property valued on Santa Clara Court. Ne said the r¢¢idente of the street were unewar¢ that any future development would take place on Santa Clara Court becau¢¢ the cal-da-tae i^ alr¢atly finieh¢d with sidewalk and a Planning Commie ion Ninut¢• //~aEE-a- December 9, 1991 l.'V~1~~8 wall while Santa Barbara Place and San Mateo Place aze clearly unf in iahed streets. He stated the tee itlents would iike to see the street remain the way it ie and would prefer no development take place, but they would be willing to support iwo homes at the end of the atreet. He noted that the cul-de-ants across Deer Creek Channel each have only two Lots flanked oEf the bulbs. He asked that the Commission maintain the City's high standards. Jerry Jacobson, 10935 Santa as rbara Place, Rancho Cucamonga, at ated that at the November 1991 neighborhood meeting he had questioned why the st re_t was being connected to Highland. He said the City et aff had said they did not know why the atreet was being proposed to go through to Highland and they would research the question. He said they had indicated they thought there was a requitement for fire access or Lhe need to have a second access becav ee a cul-tls-sac cannot be more than 600 feet long. Me said he could not at [end the March 1992 meeting and he was now disturbed to Eind out that the City had agreed not to connect San Mateo Place to Highland Avenue but instead to create a u-turn by connecting Santa Barbera Piece to San Mateo Place. He said he had been told Santa Barbara would be made into a cul-tle-sac if the William Lyon Company tleveloped the land. He eaitl he had decided to purchase that lot because he thought ii would be a cul-de-sac and ha would have a aafe place to raise hi• child. Ha asked that hie street not change and that the William Lyon Company find another way to develop the Land. Ne did not think the loop atreet With additional homes would banet:t the City. He was concerned about the additional traffic. He said his neighbors agraetl with hie con<srne. Dion[he Cueimano, 10968 Santa Clara Court, Rancho Cucamonga, et at ed she had purchased her home six moot ha ago for three reasons: 1) aesthetic qualit iea, 2) a cul-de-sac atreet whore her children could play, and 3) a large eitle yard on the end. She ea id if the development were approved she would lose all three benefits. She etaied her children would no longer be able [o play cut front and she would lone half of her aide yard, She said [hat no plane were disclosed to her prior to her purchase or she would have probably made another decia ion. She felt she development will be a detriment to Ret family, the ne i9hborhootl, and her children. Commissioner Melcher fe Lt an observation shoultl ba made LRai no ex feting Lot would lose any of iea own area as part of iRe propaeal. Chairman McNiel noted that there may have bean some confusion as to property lines and Lhero an wctione of land that have been maintained by re•ident• although not owned by the re eidenta. Mr. Auet in stated he understood the concerns about changing ihs nature of the na ighborhood and it was not the William Lyon Company's intent to degrade the neighborhood. He said that Santa Clara Court was a fin iehed cul-tle-sac but ie was tlesignetl to accommodate the additional late at the and of the atreet. Ha said the three lots era not small, ranging in size from 7,565 to 10,000 square feet. He thought the three lots would be bigger than the adjacent lots and would be desirable lots. He said the proposa4 layout ie a reasonably normal cul-de-sac layout. Ha at ated he had not bean at the neighborhood meetings but Re believed a cul-de-sac for Santa Barbara Plata and a connection [rom San Mateo Piece to Highlantl Avenua hetl been proposed et the fire[ neighborhood Planning CommLeion Minute -7- December 9, 1992 QO~D299 meeting. He indicated a sketch of the currently pronoaad layout had been presented at Che aecontl neighborhood meeting and he thought it hatl been agreed to by the people at the meeting. He said they had tried to respond to the concerns raised by the neig hbor• and he helieved they had a reaeonab le development for the property which, although it involves change, could not adversely affect the neighborhood. commisa io nor Chit iea noted that shared dr ivewaya had been conditioned at the end of son Mateo Places and she queer Toned if they could be uaetl at the entl of Santa Clara Court. Mr. Auat in observed that shared dcivewaya are not ae dseirable, but he felt they could be used to minimize the amount of curb disrupt ion. Hearing no further public testimony, oboe rued tha< City policy limits the and any attest over 600 feet must ha was the purpose of the loop arrest. at rests but cul-de-sec at reeta ere n Hr. Talleur had commented that there des-sac etraet• acroe• [he channel b bu Tit most of the cul-de-a ac etreet• Chairman McNiel clo length of cul -des-sac ve two ac teas points Me observed that of designed to be p era only two lot• a ut h• •aid that wit have three lots at t eed the hearing. Ha streets to 600 feat He indicated that children do play in arks. xe noted that t the end of the cul- hin she tract being he end. Commissioner Valletta questioned what the length of the arrests could bs if San Mateo Place entl Santa Ba[bara Place were made into cul-de-seta. Me. Nieeen noted that San Mateo Place ie cursntly 400 feet from the center- line of Lhe street to the existing wall and she showed where the 600 foot length would reach. She noted that Santa Bacbara Place could be developed ae a cul-des-sac. Comm Tae inner Valletta tole the property ie a difficult parcel for aubdivi•ion and she felt the William Lyon Company had done an excellent job. she did not think the lot sizes era inconsistent with Che adjacent neighborhood. she d1d not feel the homes would be inconsistent with the eurrountl ing homes. she was concernetl about the number of driveway coming off the end of the cul-des-sac and of£ the knuckle at the end of San Mateo Place ii.e., Lots 4, 5, and 6i. she said that was why the Dee ign Aevisw Committee had supported shared dr ivewaye. she felt the residents had come legitimate concerns and agreed [hat it would be mostly hardecape at Cho end of Santa Clara P1 are because of frontages of only 30 to 33 feet. She observed that if the land were au b0 iv ided into just two loss, the lore would be be more than 13,000 aquae Eeet, uh ich would be larger Chan of her lots in the adjacent neighborhood. she ea id the Commie ion had received direction from the City Council to 6s more aware of community concerns and she tlid not Eeel that the rest of the ne i9hborhood has eo many dr iveuays clustered together. She was also concerned about the lack of guest parking. She requested that Che ocher Commisa loner comment on the concept of eheretl driveways. Comm iesioner Melcher stated these there La no question that the charncter of sa nta dare Court will 6e changed, but what in proposed would not make it unlike other cul-ds-eac• in the City. Because of the limited frontage, he Planning commission Minutes -S- December 9, 1994 r?Q(~JVO felt the driveways should be combined for Lote 17 and 18 or Lo[s 18 and 19 sc that there would only be tuo et andard driveways at the erd of the cal-de- eac. He favored combining driveways on the other streets if Chars were other opportunit fee. Commieaionec Ch it iea agreed there ie a dilemma regartl ing the street configuration concerns. She understood that the presently proposed configuration was based upon concerns raisetl at the original neighborhood meeting. She did not see any other way tc access the lots uh ich currently face Santa Clara Court because of the difficult configuration cE the parcel. She was not sure whether having San Hateo Place loop around to Santa Barbara Place wad any better or worse than having San Mateo Place connect to Highland Avenue. She felt that combining drivewa}'a woultl be reasonable. Sne said she did not no rmnl ly like to see combined driveways if it can be avoided but she agreed that parking is extremely difficult at the end of a cal-da-sae and she wanted to avoid excaesive hardscape in that area. She noted that streets are not places to ploy. Sne felt that the loop configuration £or San Mateo Place and Santa Bnrbarn Place woultl be al ig ht ly safer than opening up San Hateo Place to Highland Avenue. Comminaicner Tolstoy agreed that the development should not hnve a street opening up to Highland Avenue because of the amount of tratflc on Highland. Ha eaitl Gnat when he wad on the Design Review Committee it had been recommsndetl ihet Loi• 4 antl S ba combined with one driveway Ln order to provide more parking and legs hardsoape on the San Maiao Place knuckle. He suggested that Lote 17 and 18 or 18 and 19 have a common driveway to provide parking room and reduce the hardacape. Commiaaionar Valletta eekatl she minimum antl maximum equate footage of end neighborhood. Me. Niaeen responded that the entire Trnet 12952 was 172 sing la family lots on J2.7 scree with lots ranging from 5,052 to 12,000 equate feet. She said there were 96 late in the 5,000-6,000 square Eoot range, 52 in the 6,000-7,000 range, 10 in the 7,000-8,000 range, 30 in the 8,OD0-10,000 range, and 4 Ln the 10,000-12,000 range. Chairman McN iel noted there had been an original plan for three cue-de-sac et taste. Ne opened the public hearing to oak how many lots that divie ion yielded. Scan Mores, Mores Consulting Group, 4 Venture, 5u its 100, Irvine, stated Che original plane from 1988 p[npoeed three cal-de-sere but one of the cal-de-eac• waa approx imataly 670 faei Lonq and they were told they could not be granted an exception to bu lltl a cal-de-sac over 600 Eaet. H0 said they Chen proposed routing San Nateo Place out to Highland Avenue, but following the neighborhood meeting they had revised the plans to the currently pcoponed loop nt teat. He ea id all three plans yid lded approximately 19 Iota. Chairman McNial noted that 670 fast would be only a 30 percent variance Erom the max imam 600 [eat. Me asked if the Commission woultl have latitude to grant that variance. Planning Commiae icn Mlnutaa -9- December 9, 1992 QO~.iV\/1 Brad Buller, City Planner, recalled that when the City Council eat ablis had the 600-toot limit there had been tliscuae ion about where the line should be drawn. Me thought the Fire Oiettici had been fairly ettonq in their position that 600 feat should be the maximum. Ne said that eoneidecat ion fora longer cur-de-sac may need to be addreaeed as a public safety issue and he did not feel comfortable making Chat des iaion tonight. commiaeioner Melcher asked the basis for the limit. Dan Coleman, Principal PLannez, notstl that the Fire Oepnrtment and Engineering O lure ion had indicated in the staff report to the City Council Chat the limit should bs set at 600 feat beeauae of the diffieu lty in backing up the fire apparatus and the need to have a fireman posted at Cae rear of the veaicla to assist in directing them. He as id it is many times necessary from a tactical standpoint to bring in apparatus from two points and it wav felt that 600 feet would ba the breaking point of whore two points wars needed vsrsu• one point. He rematketl tact a 600 foot limit far cul-de-sacs is a fairly standard rule of thumb in planning circlev. Chairman McNiel remarked Lhet if taste wa[a [o ba an abet ruction of the cul- de-sac it might ba necessary to drag firs equipment down Us street. Mr. Coleman noted that while the Pire Department ie try ing to get equipment info tae street, tae residents could also be trying to enter or exit ehs ere. Commissioner Melcher asked how wide the lots are on cul-drwc strwLS. Me. Nissen responded that they are approximately 50 feet wide. Commia•ionsr Melcher vtatsd [hers are many places in the Ciiy where 40-foot wide or narrower lots aavs bean developed oR cul-de-eats, ao teat in cul-ds- eaes of equal length there could eoncelvably bs a Eaw more houses than would be On fosse arrests. Commiesionar Vallstte asked iE it would ba possible for ehs Commission to approve the development with cul-da-sac streets with the prow L ion that it ba reviewed by tae Public Safety Commission. Mr. Buller etatsd that would mean a substantial change in the rot configuration, anO he suggaetatl twat the Commission could defer action on tae map until after receiving input from the Public Eefaty Commie ion. Commi9eioner Vallstt• felt it would De a better tract map if tares cul-drsecs could bs utilized. Ehs noted that the proposed Lots 15 end 16 ors rather large chile other lore are rather narrow. Commissioner Ma lchsr asked if ehs change would be a Miner Exception or a Variants. Mr. duller noted Ghe 600 fast i• s policy set by ehs clay Council and therefore would not cage lra formal application at either a Minor Exception or Variance. Planning Commission Minutes -30- Deuniber 9, 1992 oon3oz Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the City Council had approved the policy by minute action. Comma a ionei Melchor did not feel it would be appropriate to modify the policy to eccommodnte one eel-da-sac. He asked if an exception coultl be made to the policy. Mr. Coleman obeervetl that the policy allows Firer Planning, and Building Divisions to 'd ieeue• poeeible exempt acne or exceptions given unusual cirevmstancse. He •aid the property in quaati0n is unusual but the Fira Department did not grant an exception because it was physically you able to loop the strwb togatMr end avoid havi nq a cal-de-sac uoaad 600 feet. He did not retell Lha original design and thought it may nave pushed the cal-da- eac as far east as possible whereas it may be possible to hold the cal-da-sac aloes to 600 Eeet with the use of long fLeg lots or if the yield wars dropped Dy aswral lots. Commie toner Helcher felt it makes tenet to have a sinndard for when eubd ivls ions era be lnq made on land which le not conetreined, but he thought this wa• an awkward, remnant parcel and the length of ens cal-de-sac is dictated by the geometry of the interwction of the north/south strut. He felt it would be worth another try io obtain an exception but ha thought the proposed eontigurat ion would ba the heat if an except Lon ware not granted. Commiuloner Ch it tae talt there were other strut in the erect whleh era very near Lha 600-toot limit. She felt Lt would Da worth a look tc tea if cal-da- sae• could be used. Commie loner ToLtoy sekad haw eha Cammioloner• would foal if the developer returned ins map with three cal-de-acs and a lot of Elag lot• with very congested erase at the ands of the cal-da-ue in order to supply driveways. Na felt [hare would ba a let more hardscape at the and of the cal-de-saes. Ha did not feel the current rasidente could want a number of flag lot• which would nppear small Erom the attest. Ha thought the currant proposal wa• the bast for circulation and avoidance of flag lot• and fanning Erom the node of the cal-drsace. Ne noted that the Commluion hatl tllscouraged flag lot• on other erects. Ha stated that the ends of iM cal-de-secs would meroly present a ten of driveways with no quest perking. Commissioner Chitiea egrud It would impact the ramalnder a[ the eiteet. Commissioner Tolstoy remarked that any elms Ghsn is an in-fill prof act, theta are problems with the design parameters of eha eubdivieion. He thought Chet three cal-de-sacs would renal[ in vary unepptaltnq situations. Commiasio her Valletta euggasted the commisatonar• diecua• whether three Lab would be appropriate ei the sod o[ San[a Clare Court. Chairmen ncNial seated that with the teat of the cal-do-eac• in the tract there are similar Eans a eurrentty propoud. However, ha nobd it i• not consistent with that particular strut which hu the largest house Ln tM tr¢i with the houses spaced farther apart than on the two strset^ io tM PLnn inq Commie ion Minutes -11- December 9, 3997 ooo~oa north. He noted that the three lots proposed at the end of the attest are well above the minimum size and at the average of the rest of the lots in the tract. Commissioner Chit iea noted that the cul-de-sac bulbs accosa the channel are closet to the channel then the bulb at tRe end of Santa Clara Court is. She felt therefore the lot configuration could be diEfecent on the two aides of the channel. Sha thought three lots would fie in better with the average loi size and the felt an appropriate mitigation would be to combine driveways on tuo of those lore. Motion: Moved by Toletoy to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Tentative Tract 16116 with modification to require combining two of Che driveways at the and of Santa Clara Court. Commieeioner Nelcher eaconaad the motion £or purposes of discussion. He commented that Commieeioner Valletta had Indicated that comb inad driveways may also be appropriate at the other knuckle a. Commieeioner Valletta noted there was already n condition requiring a combined driveway at the end of San Nateo Plata. Commieeioner Melchor aekatl if Commieeioner Vellette wanted more. Ralph Henson, Deputy City Attorney, noted that Planning Condition No. 1 provides Eor a shared driveway at the and of San Mateo Plate antl Commieeioner ToL toy•• motion would add Santa Clara Court. Me oburwd Chat Commieeioner Toletoy could amend his motion to provide the came at Santa Barbara Place. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hoar ing. Mr. Talleur felt shared tlrivewaye would be inconeiaient with the Current neighborhood because theta are no other lots in the tract that have shared dz iveway9. He said the equate footage of the lots at the and of Santa Clara Court takes into account the City's quit claiming of Lot C and ha asked that the acreage of Lot C be considered. Mr. Austin stated they had revleuetl the three tul-de-sac approach early in the process with the Fire Department and Che Fire Department was vary concerned about the length of the cui-de-sac. He did not foal the Fire Oepariment would bs willing to grant an exception and preferred approval of Che prapoaed subdivision. Ne ea id they were willing to share the driveways ae had bean tliecuseed. Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing. commissioner Melchor noted that the photographs prsaented by Mr. Talleur of Santa Clara Court had depicted an open feeling from house to hones in the neighborhood. Ha hoped Chet the City Planner would require that the tall existing westerly perimeter wall 6e removed in iu ant irety, including LM foundations, back to the setback lines and the ends of the came lning well finished appropriate ly. Ha did not sea any purpose In leaving any o! the wall in front of the setback lines. Planning Commission Mlnutae -14- December 9, 1994 000304 Mt. eul le[ agreed it could ba appropriate to remove all porG.ane of the wall in that area beeau ae of the contlit ion of the number of lots in the area. Chairman McNiel questioned iE the City Duna Lot C frcm the adjoining tract. Mr. Huller stated the City does own the land antl will quit claim it to the lots being created with the aubdiviaion. Chairman HcNiel queationetl the dispoait ion of the area marked natural at the southern portion of Lot 19. Mr. Coleman noted that Engineering condition 5 regv irea the developer Co make a good faith effort to offer it to the owner oI Lot 44 to the weai because of the difference in grade from the remainder of Lot 19. Chairman McNiel observed that the motion had bean made and seconded to iaaue a Negative Declaration and adopt Cha reaolut ion approving Tentative Tract 14116 with modification to combine driveways of two of the lots at the end of Santa Clara Cou[t. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYE B: COMMISSIONERS: CM ITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLHTOY, VALLBTTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONBAS: NONE -carried Chairmen McNiel noted that the appeal proceae was available Lo Che residents of eha community. Ms stated that en alternative of working with the developer would also be available. The Planning Commieaion recasaetl from 8:56 p.m. [0 9:10 p.m. I. N o Bevel ant of a commercial shopping canter canoioting of a 7S, quaro foot groceix atom, two satallito buildings of 3,500 aquas E each, and e dr Lvr[hr ad of 4,800 aquas foot an 10.6 acroo land Ln eha Community commo al Oietriet (Subarea 2( of t oehlll Boulevard Specific Plan, loco st the northwest corns oothill Boulevard end Vineyard Avenue - APN: 01-102 -03, 5, 20, 21, and 49. Staff recommends ioeuanee of a mi tad Nep~,1' 0o Declaration. Beverly Niuan, Aswciats Plannor~+Q2eaiatad the staff report. Brad eul le r, City Plann noted that tN Oity had received lattera from adjoining properey ow axpreeaing their con<erne and those letters ware in front of the Comm nors. ~ ~ Commie ioneq~fLtoy asked if any lima of eight had boenapiepered io show CM view o~~'truck loading and shopping cart areas from Poothi tl..,eoulavard. ,s~ Planning Commioo ion Minuta^ -33- December 9, 1992 C~~D!1305 M fYl YfllFf W a ~. i , ~ R ~~ !; ati- ~ i~ i .. ? \ ii ,. ~3 v aZY i a ~U~ ~r ;i ~ ~~~ ! Q N ;{ i~' ~, N ~Il! ~~ i I h a1 ~ ~ ~~~l~.~1! ~1liel l ~! wHNI ~1 1 it ~~ ~ --~ 11, ~ ~~1 ~i~~ TIsNJO i 1 I ,~ ~~ 1 } I TR. 8 ~/ ~ i m ~ Gj ~ ~ a ~~ -- i ~z ~i I ~ J / ~ W ~ ~ Y ~ / / HILLSIDE ROAD C11'Y OF ~~~7}~,~ [1CAMONGA ~M` Tt Ia6aa \ T1TL.E: S1iE UTILIZATiUN N PLANIViI~T±~-hD IOh' ' `,":.,< .-.. Q'~n'sQ'7 EXHIBIT: B SCALE: none ~~FIOIT "~'' RESOLUTION NO. ~3. OI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 7q 776. A RESIDENTIAL SUHD VISION OF 19 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 4.09 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-H DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUE, WEST OF DEER CREEE CRANNEL, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 7076-67-03. A. Recitals. (i) William Lyon Company has filed art application for Tentative Tract 74116 as described in the title of this Re solution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tract Map request is referred to as the "application.^ (ii) On December 9, 1992, the planning Coswisal on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of avid public hearing, adopiad Resolution No. 92-146 thereby recommending to this City Council that Bald application be approved. (iii) The de ciaion represented by said Planning Commleaion Itesoluiion was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On January 20, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the epplicaiion and concluded said hearing on that date. ' (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Aeeolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it Se hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga act follows: 1. This council hereby specifically finds that nil of the facie sat forth in the Re citala, pert ^A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and ce rtifiea that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Snvlronmantal pus li ty Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 3• Ha aed upon aubetantlal evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced January 20, 1993 hearing, including writian staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced planning Comma action meeting, and the conten to of Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-146, this Council hereby a7xcificel ly finds act follows: (a) That the proposed project la cone is tent with the objectives of the General Plan) and QOP'3428 CITY CODNCIL RBaOLIR'ION NO. TT 14116 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY ,Tanuary 2c, t993 Page 2 (b) That the proposed design ie in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the Hite ie located; and (c) That the proposed design is in caapliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or Lmprovemante in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and coacluslone set forth in paragrapfis 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition as set forth in Planning Cosmieelon Resolution No. 92-146. 5. This council hereby provides notice to WSllism Lyon Cpapnny [hat the time within which judicial review of tM decision rmpresanted Dy Lhis Resolution moat be sought Se governed by the provisions of Cellfornia Coda of Civil procedure Seekion 1096.6. 6. The City Clark of the City of Rancho Cuwmon9s ie hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Iesolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolutioa, by certified moil, return-receipt requests d, to William Lyon Company et the eddreae identified in City records. 00(.1309 UCCY VP' [CANUtlV GUUNN1V1V liH ~<:,~ STAFF REPORT - '~ OATS: January 20, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: oaul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON KENYON MAY FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO VICTORIA PARK LANE; A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPN ON TERRA VISTA PARKNAY FROM CHURCH STREET 10 MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FRON HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE; AHD A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON ETIWANDA AYENUE FROM SUMMIT AVENUE TO 24TH STREET RECOMIEJDATION It is recommended Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide for a speed 11mTt of 35 MPH on Kenyon May from M111iken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane, a 45 MPH I1m/t on Terra Yista Parkway from Church Street to M1111ken and 40 MPH on Church Street from Haven Avenue to M1111ken Avenue, and 45 MPH on Etiwanda Avenue from Summit to 24th Street; and making findings thereof. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code allows cities to set speed limits 1n accordance with specific Engineering surveys in order to more precisely establish the "Reasonable and Prudent" speed requirements under basic state speed law. Th15 speed then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than 5 years old, is also required where radar 15 used for enforcement. A survey as required above has been conducted on each of these streets. The survey involved the determination of the preva111ng speed of existing traffic Dy the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to drivers which wouid require a reduced speed. The results of these surveys are summarized 1n the attached ta61e. After review of these results, 1t was found that the safety record o9 Kenyon May, Church Street, Terra Yista Parkway and Etlwanda Avenue were well within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not apparent to drivers. Kenyon Nay between M1111ken Avenue to Victoria Park Lene Majority traffic speed 30 to 39 MPH Prevailing speed of 40 MPH 000310 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESTADLISH SPEED LIMIT JANUARY 20, 1993 PAGE 2 Church Street between Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue • Ma,{ority traffic speed 3R to 47 MPH • Prevailing speed of 49 MPH Terra Vista Parkway between Church Street to Milliken Avenue Ma,~orlty traffic speed 33 to 42 MPH • Prevailing speed of 43 AWH Etiwanda Avenue between Suanlt Avenue to 24th Street • Ma,~ority traffic speed 37 to 41 MPH • Prevailing speed of 46 MPH These sections of Kenyon Nay, Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway and Etlwanda Avenue have limited access with few intersecting streets. Thus, the observed prevailing speeds must be the predominant consideration 1n determiining the speed limit. CONCLUSION A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the driven on the street and still provide for effective enforcement. A speed limit such as this is set at, in most cases, the first 5 MPH increment below the speed at whicA 851 of the drivers are going. If accident rates are higher than expected, a further 5 MPH reduction from the 851 level accompanied with a higher level of enforcement mqy reduce the accident rate to within expected Levels. The proposed speed limits are expected to be exceeded by 341 to 431 on Kenyon Nay, 201 to 311 on Church Street, 181 to 341 on Terra Yista Parkway, and 201 on Ettwanda Avenue, of the drivers observed; however, the limits should provide an effective tool for law enforcement due to the circumstances under which they will be in force. Respectfully su d, C>~~ Nilliam J. 0'Ne City Engineer NJO:PAR:1y Attachment cc: George Yankovlch, Chairmen, Public Safety Commission eonass ORDINANCE N0. SV~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MB:NDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGAROIN6 PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (11) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part D of this Ordinance. (1111 The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (11 ), above. O. Ordinance NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby 1s amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is deternilned by City Council resolution a3 upon ass o an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed penaitted by state law 1s greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found t0 exist upon such streets, and tt is declared that the prime facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated 1n this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Sp eed Ltm1t (MPH) 1. Archibald Ave. - Banyan St. to north end 50 2. Archibald Ave. - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arrow Rt. - Baker Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 4. Baker Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd 35 5. Banyan St. from Beryl St. to London Ave. 35 6. Banyan St. - Haven Ave. to Rochester Ave. 45 7. Banyan St. from west City Limits to Beryt SL. 40 8. Base Line Rd. - west City limits to Carnelian St. 45 9. Base Line Rd. - Carnelian St. to Hermosa Ave. 40 00!1312 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE JANUARY 2D, 1993 PAGE 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH1 10. Base Line Rd. - Hermosa Ave. to Spruce Ave. 45 11. Beryl St. -Banyan St. to end 45 12. Beryl St. - 800' N/o Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40 13. Canistel Ave. - Nilson Ave. to Antietam Or. 35 14. Carnelian St. - Vineyard Ave. to end 45 15. Center Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 40 16. Church St. - Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 40 17. Church St. - Haven Ave. to M1117ken Ave. 45 18. East Ave. - Base Line Rd. to Highland Ave. 45 19. 8th St. - Grove Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 20. Etiwanda Ave. -Foothill Blvd.. t0 24th St. 45 21. Fairmont Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 22. Fredricksburg Ave. - Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr. 35 23. Grove Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 40 24. Haven Ave. - 4th St. to Nilson Are. 45 25. Hellman Ave. - Foothill Blvd.. to Alta Lowe Dr. 35 26. Hellman Ave. - 500' N/o Manzanlta Dr. to Valley View 40 21. Hellman Ave. - 6th St. to Foothill Blvd. 45 28. Hernasa Ave. - Base Ltne Rd. to N115on Ave. 45 29. Hermosa Ave• - Nilson Ave. to Sun Valley Dr. 40 30. Hermosa Ave. - 8th St. Lo Base Line Rd. 45 31. Highland Ave. - Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40 32. Highland Ave. -Amethyst St. to Hermosa Ave. 35 33. Highland Ave. - Hernwsa Ave. to 800' N/o Haven Ave. 45 34. Hillside Rd. -Ranch Gate to Amethyst St. 35 35. H11751de Rd. - Amethyst St. to Haven Ave. 40 36. Hillside Rd. - Haven Ave. to Cantstel Ave. 35 37. H111v1ew Loop - Vintage Dr. to Vintage Or. 30 38. Kenyon Nay - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Ln. 35 39. Lemon Ave. -Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 40. Lemon Ave. - Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 40 41. Lemon Ave. - Haven Ave. to Highland Ave. 40 42. Manzanlta Dr. - Hermosa Are. to Haven Ave. 35 43. Mountain Y1ew Dr. - Spruce Ave. to M/111ken Ave. 40 00~?313 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE JANUARY 20, 1993 PAGE 3 Declared prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 44. Netherlands Vtew Loop - Yintage Dr. to Yintage Orive. 30 45. 9th St. -Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 46. Red Hi11 Country Club Dr. -Foothill Blvd. to Aita Cuesta 35 47. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd 40 48. San Bernardino Rd. - Vineyard Ave. to Archibaid Ave 35 49. Sapphire St. - Banyan St. to end 45 50. Sapphire St. - 19th St. to Lemon Ave. 40 51. 1Lh St. -Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 52. Sierra Crest Yiew Loop - Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30 53. Spruce Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 54. Terrace Yiew Loop -Vintage Dr. to Yintage Dr. 30 55. Terra Vista Parkway -Church St. to Milliken Ave. 40 56. Yictoria St. - Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35 57. Victoria St. - Etlwanda Ave. to Rt. 15 40 56. Victoria St. -Haven Ave. to Mendocino P1. 40 59. Victoria Park Ln. - Fairmgnt Nay to Base Line Rd. 35 60. Victoria Nindrows Loop (north b south) 35 61. Vineyard Ave. - Church St. to Base Line Rd. 40 62. Vineyard Ave. - 8th St. to Carnelian Ave. 45 63. Vintage Or. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 64. Nhittram Ave. - Etiwanda Ave. to east Ctty limits 40 65. Nilson Ave. -Amethyst Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 66. Nilson Ave. -Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canlstel Ave. 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (1) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-flue (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and (1t) The mites per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of tra ffic and are speed limits which ere reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (T11) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on Bald streets; and (1v) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared hereln• C1~43314 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE JANUARY 20, 1993 PACE a Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify Lo the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Sectton 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general clrculatton published ~~~ yCi own r o, California, and circulated Tn the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 00t~315 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE JANUARY 20, 1993 PAGE 5 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: e ra ams, y e enn s u yor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 20th day of January 1993, end was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 20th day of January 1993. Executed this 20th day of January 1993, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. e ra . e (~O(9316 F N x N {- ~m W ~ Z ~ O J= YW JZ ~"=Iff Z0.>' ~5 7 ;~~gN y ~ 'c-~ ~- e ~ 4 I ' a ~ Q I ~ ~ ~~ 1 g ~ Q W )~ 2d r°p =X 6~ ¢. s7 °f~31 ,. 2J '---. -~ --'I-- -- y > J N 3_ } V ~ ~ H W I ~ ~~~ hii~~l-~ I ~ "~ OO O l ~c~31~ U V •111M } vC VWp ~V° ~SNu TVC6t~ YYW YO: Vf WW~^4 r>c iuez it icVu w 1TM•/l Al ~. L% !1 n m • 111 18 11 R 1R IV W m m m~ on rcTU •0~+~ •LTU n~ ~p0 UTtI ~ S:w 6' O O WWi JW CSC. .-aN1 c'am' p w ¢w: ~oW1 LWC N3Ni fJ P CW nJ°1 N V. ; 0 WI L 'N]al 6 ~ N o T~-~ ~°1 Z 1 JJI 2 L S [` T '1 T J O s r ~ m m G 2 L o ~ O O N N p O O „ _J N W 2 ¢ 4[ O h i S O J 1 R t_J ~ I I 3 w` u ° i _~ J L 2 J S _ Y Q4D~1338 N U wMIY• ~ l- wLLC 00 1Ji wC6N 190 YLW I ~KN •R1 ~IOn W' /~~¢~. }UT2 Mw~ i /4 U) • :C V ~ 6~ X16 M TtO'~p ~OyV~ 1~JPV1 VPV~ 6 ~¢] .1 N P T T IIT A2 O^ N N r O N O VI O N O WW1 VWI 6641 _ N~ G w ..°¢°W' i WGI N~NI M1 J T T C f- n m N N T T N T goo: i ..: u r 1- W ~ 2 YVILLT _ _ O I/I V 4 F M P~ ~ O O •i0M N N ¢* 2 O O FF~ O O t T (. J III N K C I N { 1 J K N _S ~ S 2 ~~a °~~ C0~329 ~ N ~MM x}IyylFw FVF ~UW IJi 6 l1 TWO ~WOF ~K~-W• ~C.N^~6l ~6LNF (L O O T P IK V61 ~o'u~ FFOFaA ~YW.U2r N N m m xV ii m I N ~Y ~ - a +i ri lac`. mM iauF rv m mu• ~..e. W_ PUF N O UNUI QrQF Ow 6_ S_ J:J i T ¢CdAI r P `e 6mw ~ ~ o m m ouo: WKWR LWYA I~1 iA VI¢N.~1 P O} rviWM N T \~~ T f y°i K N6F f f 6'tN• n F N T C O P O I( O O ^6A P m A O O O O u`wi o m LWT rv rv wW~1 J N O M N F T W Y 3 6 fL J E 6 Yl L L 4 VI O ~ 2 W V U Z 'S 7 _ a J A M u ~ 000320 N 9 'n RRR RyyRRv r rRi `uW xw~ .WC ~. o x nq0 ~~J U~ Syr VpNWV RC U~• +00 +Lw + L~'W Ll •W> P •4N •MV• 1 +UnWV .OR +F+]¢• UC[Zl N iW~ ~1 + .C +W Cli n ILA O + P1-M O (L V iO~u~ +N_ +YTUV O PU• NS• +S ~W ~O {r~OU 12i¢• O • WWR L 2¢6n1 T ?6NM O r1 JIWJO~ T 4J~/ NJ V~1. G R nJ P W ~L JCR T ~WR ::~• NNR m R OOR WW• WFWIiI 6 f~pNY 2 a w w N + o m.- w .s. a°°: o o uwi N zuR fr wW• J +1 R V I+ N y O N o :~ u J • W S T N I ~i co~a21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1993 TO: Mayot and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICp, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SDBJECT: CONSIDERATION OP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 92-11 - DAMS - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require a Conmunity Trail in conjunction with the construction of a single family house totaling 7,600 square feet on 16.6 acres of land in the Open Space Diatzi ct and Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling unite per acre), located at 9400 Almond Street - APN: 1061-491-0 /. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the rnnditiona of approval requiring dedication and conatrvciion of a Community Trail across the subject property. AB9fRACT The applicants, Randy and Sandy Davis, of approval that the Planning Commiaeio their custom single family residence. are appealing certain conditions n placed upon the construction of E11CId;R00MD Since the adoption of the City's 1981 General plan, a public Community Trail connection across the subject property hoe been planned and mapped (see Exhibit "I" of Planning Commie elon Staff Report). Community Trai 18 are intended for equestrians and hikers and provide connections between the Regional Trail system and the private equestrian trolls within each subdivision. This partlcu lar secpoent is an extension of the Almond Trail: an east-went trail which extends across the entixe nozthern portion of A1[a Loma. Equeetrlana have traversed this property since the 1960's when cosmerc Lal horse boarding was fire[ established. The applicants have been steadily upgzeding the ranch as a private commercial bus meas. A new riding ring hoe been built, the di lepldnted stables have been demolished and a 9,040 square foot horse barn ie under construction. This application proposed the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a custom home. No development Se proposed within Thorpe Canyon. eoo::2z CITE' CODNCIL STAFF REPORT DA 92-11 - DAMS Sanuary 20, 1993 Pagc 2 AEAL7SI8 The Planning Commi salon's deliberations focused upon the trail issue. The design of the house, and related grading, were deemed acceptable. The house was designed consistent with the Hillside Development Regulations; hence, no changes to the house were required. Three options were presented to the Planning Commi salon: 1. Defer the trail until the property is subdivided. 2. Require an offer of dedication for the trail but defer construction until the properly is subdivided. 3. Require dedication and construction of Che trail prior to occupancy of the house. The applicant requested deferring the trail until ouch time na the property is subdivided (see Exhibit ^R" in Planning Commission Staff Aeport). The Trails Advi eory Comm tree recomannded that the trail be required at this lima, but sae flexible on the alit®nt. Several members of the Alta Loma Riding club testified in favor of requiring the trail to be cone trotted nt this time. The applicant supports a trail through the lower portion of their property, but is requesting deferral until subdivision ocNrs. The applicants letter (Exhibit "R") cites psivacy coots rne, potential liability, coat, and the lack oP any change in use of the property. In addition, the applicant notes that, should the property to the we at ever be developed and Almond Street extended, the trail improvements would be removed and a new parkway trail constructed. In denying the applicant's request to defer construction of the trail, the Planning Commission noted the following factors: 1. The Trails Implementation Plan recognized the Almond Trail ae an important east-west linkage. 2. The applicant operates a commercial horse boarding and training facility wh1eR derives a direct benefit from the use Che equestrian trail system which crosses other private props rtiee Srt Alta Lome. 3. A public Community Trail exists to the Me6t through the adjoining Tract 11626 (see Exhibit "P" Sn Planning Comsdedon Staff Report). 4. A trail route errata to the east across private properly aith unrestricted acceca. 00(!323 CITY COVNCIL STAFP REPORT DR 92-11 - DAVIS January 20, 1993 page 3 5. The substantial coat of the trail vas the result of the applicant's preference to align the trail through the steepest areas of the property and the necessary grading and retaining walla this would entail. The Trails Advisory Coam:ittee and staff had recommended minimal trail improvements to keep the area natural. 6. The coat of the trail could be minimized by following the existing dirt raadl however, the Coamlasion accepted Lhe applicant's proposal to align the trail along the westerly and southerly edge of the property. A complete copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and minvtee are attached for your consideration. Reapec a , r Brea Buller City planner HB:DC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit "B" - getter from Applicant Exhibit ^C" - Plnminq Cammi salon Minutes Planning Cos®leaion Resolution oP Approval No. 92-150 pQ1,?324 Cl'1'Y UN' RANCHO CUC.A.MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FARM: Arad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, principal Planner 6UBTECT: pEVELOPMfiT7T REVIEN 92-11 - DAMS - The development of a single family house totaling 7,600 square feet on 16.6 acres of land in the open Space District and Vezy Low Residential District (up io 2 dwelling unite per acre), located at 9400 Almond Street - APN: 1061-491-01. ABSTRACT: This item is a deai gn review of the house and related grading. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: This item requires design review by the full Planning Comtoi scion par the Rill Aide Development Regulations because the existing grade exceeds 16 percent, greater than 5 feet of cuL and Eill la proposed, and greater than 1,500 cubic yards of cut/fill Ss proposed. SITE CAARACTEAISTICS: The site ie a horse ranch, including a re aidence, riding arenas, barn/stables (under conatructlon), and accessory strnctuzea (see Exhibi[a "B" and "C"). These improvements lie between the Demene draimga arse and Thorpe Canyon. physically, the site is notable for Ste prominent hillside location at the base of the foothi Lla, mature Sycamore ttaea, and the steep oak-studded Thorpe Canyon, featuring a year-round stream, and heavy vegetation. Numerous utility easements bisect the property (see Bxhlbit "R"). A public Community Trail (thzu Tract 11626) adjoins a portiott of the westerly property line (see Exhibit "A"). ^a he appllcent intends to demolish the existing residence to construct a new home in the same location. The elope varies greatly across the site, ranging Erom 5 percent to over 30 percent (see Exhibit "D^). ANALYSIS: Staff worked closely with the applicant to address hillside and design issues. Therefore, Ln presenting the revised plena to the Oeaign Aevlew Committee, staff identified the following key design elamenta In support of this project; No development ie proposed within the scenic Thorpe Canyon area. 2. The proposed two-story home and driveways have been sited where the existing residence and driveways are located to minimize grading. 3. The proposed home has been deli gned in accordance with the Ai llaide Development Regulations, such as plotted parallel with contours, split pad, detached garage, varied roof elements, end a combination of one- and two-story elements. 4. The proposed gradrng mimics existing grades which are man made. ..,.~ OOR32 GX h -pr i ~y PLANNING COMMISSION STAPF AHPORT DR 92-it - DAMS December 9, 1992 Page 2 5. The proposed elevations are well below the maximum 30-foot building envelope. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (MCNie1, Melcher, Coleman) reviewed the project on November 3, 1992. The Coomittee reco®ended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed grading Scheme includes regrading several large elope ereae that will require planting per the Nillside Development guidelines and standards. The applicant has aubmitied a Conceptual Landscape plan indicating extensive elope planting (see Hxhibit "G^). 2• The proposed slopes should feature the following elements: variety in slope gradient wherever possible and rounding off hard edges (i.e., top/ice) . 3. The proposed interceptor drain at the top of the elope above the house should be "naturalized" will: native river rock or colored concrete. 4. The proposed retaining walla should be redesigned with terracing. 5. Any trees removed shall be replaced per the Tree Preeernation Ordinance. 9. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trai18 Advisory Comittee revieaed the projec! on October 21, and November 1H, 1992. The Hiklnq and Riding Trails Nester plan indicates a Co®uni ty Trail connection acroea the project site (see Hxhibit "I"). This would be m extension of the Almond Trail which would ultimately connect to the exiating Ca®unity Trail within Tract 11626 to the wear and the future Regional Trail to the east. There are a variety of poeaible trail alignments ae shown in Hxhibit ^J." Staff recom:enda that the Planning Comieslon consider the following factors in deciding whether it ie reasonable to require a Liail at this time: 1. The proposed house only replaces the exiating house. 2. The steep grades (in excess of 30 percent) make it extremely difficult to construct a trail down end up the canyon walla: therefore, the coat of constructing the trail sill be aubetantiel for a project of this limited scope. 3. The property may be subdivided in the future. 4. There Se no existing trail to the east aith which to connect. The Planning Commieaion may consider the following options regarding the Community Trail faeue: 1. Defer the trail until the property is subdivided. 000326 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 92-11 - DAMS December 9, 1992 Page 3 2. Require an offer of dedication for the trail bui defer construction until the property is subdivided. 3• Require dedication and construction of the trail prior to occupancy of the house. The applicant requeate that the Community Trail he deferred until such time as the property ie subdivided (i.e., Option ^1"). The attached letter (sae Exhibit "R") explains their reasons for deferral. C. TecMical Review Committee: The TecMiwl Review Coamittee reviewed the project on November 6, 1992. The Fire Safety DiVlaion recommended that a fuel modification plan, fire defense plan, fire hydrants, and an automatic fire extinguishing system be required because the project Se located althin a high Eire hazard area. The Engineering Division eocoamended a lien agreement for the future conatzuctlon of Almond Stree[. A31 of these comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval in the attached resolution. D. Grading coomittee: The Grading Committee recomended that the project be approved aubje c! to conditions addressing coa¢+llance with the Mi llslde Development Regulations (sea Design Feeviea CowWttae conditions above) and the Uniform Building Code. A final soils report and p!ology report sill be required during plan check. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cca®Leeion conditionally approve the project through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Reaps ally submitted, Brad idler City Planner BB:DC/jfe Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Aerial Photo Exhibit "C" - Topographic Mnp exhibit "D" - slope Ana lyele Map Exhibit "E^ - Grading Plan/Cross 9ectiona &xhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Landacal» Plan Exhibit "N" - Sasen.nt Map Exhibit "I" - Biking c Aiding Trails Maatmr Plan Exhibit "s" - Trail Alignments Exhibit "R" - Appllcant'^ Latter Resolution of Approval 001327 .... CoMM t~N I ~c'Y "'I'p~IL ~f,~tls'1'IN~.) c It-r c.I M I r -rpn~r ~~cpz6 ;; ~~.~ 4}s.::~~ :..c. ~... L"`" 'ri " a VL FC os ... FC FC ~~ r~~ .~:~ ~dNenK {' ~~;, FC i ,.,~i, .',.~'~' f .. ........... L.Hlll~~ ': ' { Y ~ Y p CITY OF RANCfiO. IvUCAMONGA ITEM. ~ PLANNING DMSION TITLE:VIGIIJI N EXHIBR: SCALE: (~~3z3 n~~- N~ ~ ,_ ,s ~,:_~ ,~W ~~~ '. ~~~' ,;: b ~.Y _ ; ~~ ' c"IO ~'; '~' rrC. v av, i^~ ~ `~, v r~ i Y~ I i.'~! '~';. sl~.~a rR'.: ~ .~ ~-1 u 4-fx, C1,~~ YI~..>}~{.~• ~ _ ^~ 4'e ~YY: _ ,~~~: ••1:: / ~N ~a _.L :. ._~wT......r~ I ~L~n 4 ~~ ~~M T s'" 1 \ ~ ~\ /^, =\ ` \~ ~~ . ~ ny ~ T ~~~_ . ~, a~ ~-~~ t _. \ `` '`~- ~._: -~~ -L./ c._/ .__ .._~ _ __ `= ~~ _ , / , ` ~ ~ ` ti~^ ~' ~. I ~"~ ~^ //\\ \ ~ `~ ~ ~, ~;' - , ~~~ ~~., .~ . 1 ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~6 ~ ~ '~ . 'C ~- __~ , ib ~ \ j i~ -~C. ~%~ ~/ /i / ~ ~ l - I~ K __ i by - ~.. ,' ..11\ \ `.i .Rl~ •~ ...'-- m.~ ~ .S: r:e .4.. C ` ~~ l wu , n : RS(e.:n Y4 r . s.. ~['t'ps ." Euc._ c \ ` \ . ~ ;~- Z2 \\ \ \ -.~ ^ ~~ ^, 1 _' ~i I _ ~~ _ ~ / ~~ ~ .. ~ == ~~ .~~~ - , -_ ~_ T -°_ _~. _~ ~- _ ` xna \--~:_ _= y- `- _ ~_ . ~._- _ _- -- --: __ --~ _ - -- ~ _- =-- r ~~ ,= _s ~; ~~~ ~ i ._ f , J J; ~. ~,- Yy -~;,^. `' V a ~~~ s,~,, ,, ~;~X, ~, _,~__. OL ., - , _. _~_. @a.r ~.~ ,', ,._r~,~ ~-~ ~'~ ,. ~ NAIL _ ~ ~ 1/ ~ •\ ~~ 1 ! , m .,,., _I ~ l~ ~- _ ~~~ ~~ ~, - - 7 M r~ 1f ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 1 z I ,~L o :J ~__t._f - 1 j, ~ .. - -r--- M . ~, ~ • moo ~ r~' ~ r ' i, r r l it it {I r~ l '\ ~~ ~ ~~7 % ' li :' :~ '--"mss ~.;.. ~ . , ~ _ 6 ~, ~ ~ ~ ; ,..~ e ~ ,-.`~~ ry 1~. .i~ ac s.~ i i, '~ Y i rT 9a ~, y~~~ _'' _ !~~ ,. ;. ,.~., ..-~~..,. ~ r ' ., J a +" ' ~i ~ .-_-- ~ I ..,, , , _~. _ r > ~ ~. ~~~ 7 i _ ~~ ~. 3 ~~ ' ;~ `' F F ~~ 3 3~ i ~ i "~ i.A 1~ h ,~~ ~ y ~ JJ ~ , '~ ~ ~ ~• q ~ ~'1 l S .. l: + ', ~ ,~ j 1 ~ , s I i` J r' y f ~i ~. ., , ~, :, o i a ~ _ ~ r '~ 1 ~ ~ U U u ~ 1 ,~ 1 ° 1, ~ z 5 ~ 8 ~ ~ r Y y ~ ('333 ~ ~~ i f i ,i ~_ ~,i ~I li ~ ~1 ;- - of I a -, 0 ~~ ~. i° ~; i ~~ i° ~~ ~~ ~< 1= 000334 ~. ~~N vo~s xn~•~r~,-,~y ~' ~ ~ . r .. r,....e. ~-. -: - ~ ~ ~ ~.s~ u lif Wiwi '_M~~ IWYb 1~R111 ~ < . W }~ b ` iw Y_ ']C i_9_f 4~ ^~"dG+~L yg~ wi Iti ___ ~.y' ~__ _ ~c/ (• Y J a+. ~ F P ` ~ F ' % 5 n a ;B:o ~ j +~ ~t ~~ ,~. ~ _. ' F ` ~di~ ~ ~ ~ ,a 9' , ,-,~..~' 1 1\ e ~: ~ ~ ~_ ,..1 .J ~'-;+.yr~~ fir?'' " 4' ~~.. •~~ •'`~h..:, .. \~~ it , , ~ ._., '-',..~N ~y~lti wr~ ~.~+-. ~-r" f ~: Si~.tl ~Oh.tl.o-~~rvf l~~y O ' h101 ~J^ `/ 1A~0OMna~I o-~~b Np~.v~ g149~ G~+f: a3.llwn :: LY?l 2 l { ~ y / C y+ e SS 1y ± i~ ~ l 1 y 'k~u 7~e4 9ti ~ _~ 'F ~~~~ ,.3d ~ ',I ~4 5 ~a 4 ~+ o 3 i r,;~2 [3 e'~ ; ! ~ C 3 ~ ~ '`e ~ y '~k:`2 x3 j~ ~~~ , . ~bnt~ da Jt +e- ±~ ~ ~ _ ~ G 1 ;~~:, i ,, _,, '> yG~ ti ~'t ;Y } ;, 'r Vr.1. ~'~ i~ :I ~.-~z. oor~a:~ T "4•Z+ ~ tlx: ~-~__ ~~~ ~~ ~ ; ~V F 8 ,~~• r~ t) ~ 't~ f y 3 iCi~ l G 1 \ • ~ \ ~ s ~y; r ~3 t ' !\\ ~ o ~'. ~~ .. t i \ 1 ~ ~. ~~ ` li !i II • '~ 00~ 1 ~ ~ i. r h I! ti' !' ` ~ ~' ~ ~'~" ~' p I, II rt t ~,~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~~ ri rt ti It ~ 1 ii i~ it fi i~ !i ~\ ~ ~•: - ~ ~. ~ t , - ~! t ' fl +, 000000 - .. . , -~: ~ ~ ' :~ t '~~ ~ ~ ' u rl f ~ ~ t ~ ~ .~ ~ r s t ^./ iu' ~~ t / ~i 00(!337 - ^~~~' fi .; , , ~._ _ ,._ Figure 2: HIKING & RIDING TRAILS MASTER PLAN LEGEND Proposed Brldpe Proposed Street Undercroaslnp Exlstlnp Streot Undororoaalnp ReplaMl IaubFPirrpoae TnWS: The rapbrgp Yalb are dr oacNborn al tM puWb iraY gnbm. Thsy an reserved, brp dbtarse oonWon and nerve as the msYr aonrrcars b ttte repbnal parW aceMc caryore, the rwiorw anat. other rnyor open eVacse. nsidentlal, oonartarcW, and Nrdtratrbl area. The replorud tnw mUrMy albw 11000 Oofarel Chameb and ulNiry CofrldDn. Tlrsy ere krlandad ar ua u eouuMan, psdsetrlan and bicyde trails. Catrrsathy TnIN: The corlnsrrAty trait provWe tqA upr aocsaa a oortrrswty facNMks such u parka, aelroob and sltoppirp center. Thane public traMS arm bops d varyirp bnptlr and ad u the Nrri t»Mreen the heal iNder IraNS h each Vad and the repionW trait 00~33H rr/1~~ 1 N~ M 1 ~ J ~~/ ~ ~\`\\~~ J/jam=~` ~, "~ ~ '. ~; 1 ~' ~ ~~ `s./ ~. ~~ _~`~ ~/ •v1 ' ~~ `--~ i '+w ' mu ~_, ~ ~ -yam ., '~ \\` a 4Q ~~ ~- -_ __ - s I . ~ A~~~ ~ _ ~. . " ~ ^ ;: 1i - /` i. -_ ~ ~ ~- ---~-.- ~_~ t /s _ s.. ND _ - ~ sa>~ ~. a~., ~ '~Jl~11, o~t~r~ .. .... .a.:...: ~uw.~o , . ~ ~ we. •.,. '^ ~..a...'. ~['Nf a ~ . .~'~, ~ '~ ~~ SON Y S .."s a., a:e: C ~ n H~•:,. ~ .~. nn. A.. OO'.r~~ ~-~ i Knl ANC". . ~:"`' aF gAWpq ^N~Nt3A crty tx~pc November 16, 1992 NOV251992 L71sHltol ltltsl1IZ131415f~1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr. Jack Lam, City Manager RE: Development Review 92-11 Davis Residence - 9400 Almond Street Dear Mr. Lam, We are the new owners of the property located at 9400 Almond Street, approximately 17 acres with a single family residence and horse boarding facilities. During the time that purchase negotiations were taking place, we researched the site as to ~eny restrictions, conditions or problems with the site that may hinder the revitalization and facelift for the site while not changing the use. The response from the City staff wee that there would be no restrictions in proceeding with the intended project. We have been pursuing this approval for approximately 8 months in an effort to build what we had believed would be our dream home. The property is located in an isolated and rural area of Rancho Cucamonga with an existing residence that ie over 20 years old end is in quite a state of disrepair. Additionally, the site hee historically been used to commercially board horses and these boarding stables also were in a state of disrepair. It hee been our intent to continue this boarding and training service, and we have a city business license to do so. As this will be the site of boarding activity end our personal residence, we wish to build a home that we end our children can enjoy end feel comfortable in. The run-down individual stable stalls are being replaced with a centralized born that ie efficient and aesthetically pleasing. The born ie being pushed further away from the residence becauee of our desire to maintain privacy. The existing dilapidated residence ie planned to be replaced with a new, spacious end whet we feel will be a beautiful home. F AL this time, we feel the request for ue to construct a public horse trail through our property ie en unreesoneble one in ea much as the site usage ie to be unchanged. Should we have desired to reside in the existing house and utilize the existing horse boarding facilities, we would have no requitement placed upon the property to construct a horse trail. We also do not feel that it ie unreesoneble for us to expect to retain our privacy end seclusion for our family in our new home. 000340 ~~~ I~N Since we have purchased the property and our horse trainer has been working we hnve had numerous riders, whom we do not know, come onto the property and poke around looking into places that ie no concern to them, creating a distraction to our employee, who is employed to train horses. We believe that this curious attitude will become even more exaggerated when our new home ie built. We hove also found that the insurance requirements imposed by our insurnnce carrier would be financially draining due to the amount of liability coverage required for such a trail to crone the property. With the ongoing activity of the working ranch it ie extremely possible that a horse with an unskilled rider mny become skittish and subject that rider or others to serious injury. We have explored possible alternative locations for the trail to get from the west aide to the east aide of our property to sllevinte some of these concerns. However, due to topographic features of the site another problem arises. The trail moat traverse the caayoa that parallels the west property line, the wells of the canyon ae they ,exist are in excaea of 40 percent. As such, the design criteria of the City Engineering Department of a maximum 15 percent is devastating and even some elope alternatives in excess of 15 percent were explored. To eat n trail which descends into the canyon'then ascends up the other side end then continues ncroae the Bite have generated estimates to construct ranging from $20,000 up to $50,000. We feel this nn extremely excessive expenditure to subject upon a single residence, especially in the existing tough economic times. At this time ae would eek the Commission to consider deferring the construction of the horse trail until such time ihet the adjoining 11 acre bluff to the west is subdivided. At each time that n aubdzvision should occur on that property Almond Street, the southerly 33 feet of our property, would need to be extended for access. This extension would necessitate a re-alignment of the horse trail thereby rendering much of the monies spent nt this time as wasted. We nre willing to work with the City in this matter and execute en agreement to participate in the construction of the hose trail when this adjoining property ie subdivided to more efficiently end coat effectively achieve the ultimate trail connection. Sincerely, Randy and Sandy Davie 000341 U UEC 221992 %a~( ~irF TOE Mayor Dannia 9lout 6 aaaboro of TM City Council of tha•City of Rancho Cucaaonga, Cal/fornla. 9uDJact~ ADPaal of Planning Coaali asian loci sion. Dacaabar 21, 1992 Tho undaroignad Rancho Cuuaonga proporty ownaro deal re to appeal the ~Planninq Coao~i asien daeiolon of Daeaabor 9. 1992 ragardlnq the raQui rawonto for a bri dla trail on our proporty at 9600 Alaond 8t root, Alta LoM. Ma era willing to offer daAi cation of property for trail purpooos bu! doairo to defer conatructlan of tM trail until ouch Liao as tM proporty oast and/or wet of our proporty !^ developed for use. Reapeetf ully, Randol h 9• D ~7/i..cCILQ ~ /Crrt./.,7 9andr•a P. Davis QQn342 ^.!..F!.: 'r s:ir rreT CnIF'i_ICJ'r. . -_-- .~ ." SAblC 4:i fIJ(~enO:uG:====~_~ :Ii': Hvi i. ?:e'r 'c?-iE52 .i;: ~~I', F' -._.. iii ;: [: r_r ~, EI'S.On ______________ T I I .. ~N ~~' ~ C airman McNiel was concerned that moving the master Dsdtoom windows Erom t r elevai ions would leave a long blank expanse of wall. Commie Doer Valletta elated there had been dieeueeions regard the potentia of placing windcwe higher Chan eye level to permit ligh o enter while bloc g the view. Chairman McKie asked if there had been any cone ideration Ivan to other architectural ame 'ti`\es to be ndded to Lost portion of the b ding. Mr. Xa;ve stated not specific had bear. dieeuaced of r than Davinq staff review the modification ~ Chairmen McNiel suggested tlyt staff require arch' ciural eMancoment iE the moving of th+ windows rasulte~in a plaln look. Cammieeioner Chitiea suggested th4 elevation a returned to the Design Aeview CommittN. ~' • \ CommLaioner ToLtoy sugguted that st handle tM matter. t` Commissioner Chitisa tell it wou De ::qta appropriate to return [o the Committee u a Conant item. \* commiuioner Tol etoy stated t would be accep Ola and he amended his mot loo to that effect. Commissioner Chilies re irmad her aeeond with th change. The motion to iuue a Negative Decl anon and adopt the nsolut n• approving Tentative Tract 16405 and Vari • 91-11 with rtroditicetione to re irs that mature trees sahedu led to ramal • pruned by a liesnaed free trimu approved by the CLty Planner pribr to ccupaney end to return tM rear elsva ons Co tM Oee lgn Review Committ on a consent calendar basis carried by tN ` ollowing vote: AYES: MMISSIONERS: CXIT IEA, MCNIEL, MELCXER, TOLSTOYr VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried L. DEVELOPMENT REVIEN 92-11 - OAVIS - The development of a single family house totaling 7,600 square feet on 16.6 arru of land In the Open Space D Ltriet and Very Low Residential DLtriet (up to 2 dwell Lnq units par acre), located st 9400 Almond Strset - APN: 1061-491-01. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, pnunted the staff oport. Chairman McNiel requoud Uarif icat loo on tM you lbl• tra 11 routes. Mr. Colman outlined CM opt lone. Chairmen McNiel asked if any of tM property would 6s wltable for subd iv Llon and dwslopmant. ~(16~343 Plannln9 CommLSS ion Mlnutee ]- December 9, 1992 Exh~ b~~ "g,. Mt. Coleman responded that it was Chairman McNiel asked if there uae any commercial value in terms of what waa happening to the property. Mr. Coleman replied that the property had previously been operated a• a boarding facility and Re believed that was the applicant's intent. He said they currently have a Grainer uor ki ng at the site and it is one of the Eew faeilit tee of that nature remaining in the area. Commiseionar Meleher said it appaaretl there uae a road running south of Gha barn location and awinglny to the north along the watt. He said he had been on the property several times before the Oaviaes bought Gha property and he recalled that the toad followed tRe contiguraxion of the northern possible trail routs shown on Exhibit ^J^ and allows one to tltivs up to other aide of Thorpe Canyon in a four-wheel drive vehicle. Mr. Coleman stated that the previou• property owner allowed squeetrians to ride through the property end use the road as a trail. He said on the canyon to the west, a similar existing dirt road had been converted to a community trail. Commissioner Melc Rer felt there wa• a tough question about [he project. Ma sLatsd the applicant had proposed a nice houaa and a good echame for tRe redsvelopmenC of the property, but he noted the applicant ie also planning a eommarcial equestrian endeavor on the •ite and he felt people sROU ld be able to ride borate to the place of xhe business. Ne felt that alone may juetiEy having the trail improvements instal lad at LRis time. Ns questioned why it thou ld be deferred. Chairman McNisl invited public comment. Sandy oavie, owner, 9400 Almond street, Rancho Cucamonga, said they were totally opposed to having a trail run through their property 6eeauss they are in eM business o[ boarding hone for tRSir clients. she noted that tRs proposed trail run• right through CRe middle of their property and would be a major intrusion on their privacy. she said they would like the trail to go along Almond Sirast to the south In the futon when someone dsvQops to tM seat or watt o[ CMir property. SRe said the blggesG Lsue 1• Liability and her insurance company would not ull s policy for people who just want to ride through the property. she said they had spent a lot of money on the it property rend houaa. She Essred that horsa• which are trailing through the property may graze and peal diseaas• if CMy haw not had proper abort. Shs wanted to meko aura her clisnxs' horasa did not catch any diseases. She ^ald they were not opposed to a trail, Dut they wanted it along Almond Street and they canted it deferred beeauea the coat would be eteggarinq at $20,000-$50,000. Commix toner To la toy noted that one of her objections to s trail had bun inasnnca. Me said •ha had also uid •hs would ltka a futon trail along Almond Strut, and he quutionsd why then would be a dif [stance in inw renew if the trail wets along Almond. Planning commix ion Minutes -J4- Oscember 9, 1992 00344 Hra. Devi• avid [hare would be no fencing along the northern trail, whereas there would G fencing along the Almond route. She said they did not want to be liable for anyone falling on their property. Commissioner Toletoy asked if it would not be poaeible to fence along the northern trail route. Mz •. Devi• said the northern route would be in the middle of their property and they would Chen not be able to drive [halt vehic lee through their own property. commiaeioner Mslcher agreed it would De difficult to fence eha trail at the northern location. Hrs. Davie acid it would cauu a lot of problems ai the northern location. crag Pilcher, 8990 Citation Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is a Hember at Large of the TreiL Adv ivory Comm tries, and as each speaks tormal ly fo[ the equestrian members of the community. He stated he wished to clarify that there i• an existing unimproved pa cage extending from the east property line in a northautezly diceetion tc Arehibsltl Avenw. He aid Chet paaeage i• currently used by equestrian members of the community. He said previous owners of the Davie' property had bean nice in nl lowing equastriane to pace through the property. He said he understood the liability iuw but Eelt that Chia is an important link in the Almond Trail. Don Terry, 9023 Appaloosa court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is president of the Alt• Lana Riding club. He said the Riding club has always been a strong supporur of the equestrian community and any equuerlan activit tee in she area. He said they were pleased to see that the property will be a horse i u fining and boarding stable and felt Lt will be an Gaut to the area. He said the Riding Club also [eel• the General Plan and award winning Trail 2mplementation Plan mutt De adhered to. Ns noted that lndivldual lot devslopnent such a• the throe lot• west at Heritage Park wet of Hillside Avenue were requited to improve the Cra1L in their front yards CO bring Cham up to City trail standards. He felt the fact that the Davin' property 1. 17 acrd ehou ld not alter the requirumt. Ne nobd the property aLO contaln• a comsercial enduvor. Ne felt eha Dav U' clienu will want to use the exist Lnq trails and perk Eacilltlu, end he orated CM expenw for those fac111t Le are borne Dy the equutrisn community. He felt it wee unfair to think that the property line gates could awing in only one direction, allow inq the Davis' clienu to uu eM equwstrian facil it is• while not allowing the equestrian community • means Co pu• the property. Xe thought it wu doubtful the Davis' property would ever be •ubdly ided bateau of the location o! the improvements, tM steep canyons, end limited stases acrou the Demens flood control uaah; end M Ghentare thought the Planning Commie ion •hould now require the Creil improvements. Commiuioner Val Ltu noted that the trail is entirely on privau property. she acid she hsd concerns where • erall would div ids privau property. SM asked 1! there wu a precedent where a trail cut acroo privau property. Planning CgM1nleslon Hlnutu -33- December 9, 1992 oo~a~~ Mr. Terry stated that all of the houses in the northern end of Alta Loma are horse property and all have a bridle path behind them, even though ii ie private property. Commissioner Valletta caked if mere are existing brttl le erai la which literally cut parcels in hal E. Mr. Terry stated he did not support cutting the parcel in half. Me agreed with the Davieea that would not ba a good location for the trail. He Eelt there would be better locations, perhaps on the south end of tine property along Aimontl Avenue. Commissioner Valletta aeketl if he would support deferring the construction of the tretl until further development occurs. Mr. Tarty tali that the trail should be improved to City standards concurrent with the improvements being constructed now. Jan Stanton, 8760 Golden, Rancho Cucamonga, stated ohs had moved to the area in 19fi9 becauw they wanted equestrian property. SM old they had decided on Rancho Cucamonga beceuae the city hoe a plan antl generally sticks co it. She felt the Trail Implementation Plan i• important. Shs understood why Cne DavUU would not want their privacy taken away, but ohs quest TOned the reasoning that horsae boarding ni tM Davia• property could De exposed to disuu by other hovel using tM trail. She wondered if that IlKiant the horses never lefi the Oavis' property and used public trails. Mrs. Davie said they did not run into a lot of harass when they trail 6acausa there i• a lot of open apace. shs said that whenever nores• era brought for boarding, they are up-to-dote on shots. She did not fsei it would be [air Lo expose het <lisnte' hones to other horsae. Me. Stanton felt the plan thou ld ba adhered to even if the trail lo<atlon needs to be moved. SM noted that sM has to me intaln the trail behind her houu and the heritage trees even if she dots not like them. Pam Xenry, 9013 Caballero, Rancho Cucamonga, noted that the General Plan shove the Almontl troll going across the area end had been on the book^ a long Gime. She remarked that people have been riding through the Davis' property Eor a long time and tMre are eurrenely trail connections. SM notetl that the ex Lsting Community Tra 11 coda at tM edge of the Davis property, and CM Almond trail Ls scheduled to qo acroa^ the entire City and ie probably the only trail in the City with moth aesthetic valve because of the canyons ie traveass. She uid that all of the other trails follow Clty streets. SM said there are currently no finished tra il• that go all the way acroa ens City and that L^ why it i• important to get the era il• open. She tali tM link at tM Devls• property i• a very important link. shs feared that if ttu Grail were deferred, tM property would not be redeveloped antl the trail may never De built. She sympathized with the Devisee and understood why they did nor want a trail going through the mitldL o[ their property. Sne is It the alignment by tM Almond St not uwment would make man sense. She noted that mere la an ex Sating dirt road through the canyon which branches beak down info the canyon Planning CommLeion Minuta• -36- December 9, 3992 Q01~346 DeCOre getting to the Cep where one could see the development. She felt it might be poeaible to bring the trail along the canyon while still maintaining control of acceee to the developed area. She hoped the City might try to be creative in thinking of way to help get the trail built. She suggested the City might De aDls to financially joint venture the developman! of the trail eo the alignment could De palatable to the Davieee. She augg¢eGeO the Op¢n Space Eaeament Act cE 1976 could be used co dad icat¢ land and get tax credits. She noted that tM Engineering Div ie ion had not requ¢etad the usual City etandarde for a Community Trail. She also et at ed there ie another trail going through Hermosa G[oves west of Hermosa where the <rail bifureatee eom¢ of eh¢ lct• and ii e¢emad to be working without problems. She noted that the Grail on the property to the west used a dirt road and upgrading was not required other than Eencing in areas where the trail was particularly steep on the [idea. She noted that proposed Engineering requirements wore not the extensive level normally required for Community Trail• until full-fledged Almond Street ie developed. Randy Davie, 9400 Almond Street, Rancho Cucamonga, eteted abet theit ineutanoa carrier had informed them Chat there would not be a problem if the [rail were fene¢d in at the southern end of the property, how¢v¢r, iE eha trail were run through the midd l¢ of th¢ property it uou 10 not be totally f¢nc¢d. X¢ noted that a Community Trail i¢ used Eor hiking and bicye le riding in addition Co horseback riding end a lot of people could Da wandering around their property increasing Chelr liability. He observed that Xr. Pllchsr had •aid th¢ trail• currently connect but hs said there will De a well wMn they finish their improvement e. H¢ ¢aid shay used to board ihsir borate on the property end the former owns re did not allow just anyone to go onto their property. Xe Felt Chet when the property to th¢ west i• developed, it would b¢ ¢ary to improv¢ the troll. H¢ euggestad that ridsr• could ride around ehsLr property and back up to Elood control ehann¢1 to connect to the existing trail. Hs did not feel they should have to spend 550,000 to develop the trail along Almond becaus¢ i[ would have to b¢ redone when the property to the west is subdivided. He said [hey are only updating their property and building a new house. Mr. Pilchsr felt that bringing the tra 11 acuth along Almond would be difficult as theca are currently 3-4 foot drop-offs because Chars Ls a lot of aroe ion in [ha area and It would 6e harA to maintain a [rail in the flood plane. Hr. Davie noted that the trail Mr. Pilchar referred to on the east ie currently erod¢d with a 30 percent grade and is not being maintained. There wen no tuxthar public comments. Commissioner To letoy race lied that when the City wee formed, ohs of the promises made was that there would De an ¢questrien area in northern Alta Loma. He observed that the General Plen ref lade thoe• daalraa. H¢ ea Ld the only way co g¢[ a trail is to install a link every [hence theta is, even it LASH ors no ti¢• on tit h¢r end, because eventually then will D¢ an opportunity to ¢%tend tM trail. X¢ uid then is a prendent Cor [calls that Oon't qo beyond the property lines. He Celt the Almond Trail i• ono of the vary important traLl• In the City and the trail •hould b¢ conseructad at ehi• time. H¢ said hs had been using eha Cra11 system ac roe• the Davis' property Planning Commieaian Mlnute• -37- December 9, 1992 OOf*347 for 60 yearn. He felt there would be a way to work out the trail and euggeated following the road from the existing Community Trail tc the west along the northern lip of Thorpe Canyon and then utilizing the middle trail of the three proposed trail routes. Ha felt the middle trail could be installed below the lip of Lhe canyon to insure the privacy of the Devisee and then continue the frail along Almond to Coo ae neck Road. Ha said there is a precedence for having tza il• which do not follow property lines and there has bean continuous use o£ the trails for years. He stated that if iha Davieae did not like the way ha had euggeated the trail configuration, they should work with staff to tlse ign a trail that would be palatable to Lhem. Xe din not feel it would be very expene ive [o install the trail the way he euggeated and said that if Chey wished to follow another path that would be more expensive, it would bw their choice. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Commissioner Toletoy. Sha said that she also had ridden on that propatty prior to incorporai fan info the City. She es id it look a lot of hard work and contribution 6y members of the community to design eha Trail Implementation Plan now in place. She felt the trails ors an important element of the General Plan which has bean atlopted Dy Ciiy Council. She noted the properly contains a conmarcial operation in addition to the house. Sha felt there should ba flexibility as to Cho location of the trail. Commissioner Mslcher agreed. commie inner Valletta concurred and suggastod that the matter qo back to the Trails Adv Leoty Committal as Ms. Menry nod some euggeK ions on low coat methods to implement the trail. Mr. Coleman stated the conditions were currently worded to allow return to the Trai le Committee through the Plan Check procaaa. He said the Commission ws• not expected to determine the trail alignment, but merely to decide if the Grail should ba rage irad at this time. chairman McNial stated hs could undaratand the need to connect the trails to eery ice LM community at the least Lmpoeit lon tD the p[oparty owns r• faun lvad. xe taco llad that the precadance Co cross enrough the mitldle o[ a property in eha peat, tlid so because the configuration of the property would not allow any other •lignmant. Ns felt the euggeated conLigurat ions througn the middle of the Davls' property in assenca makes their property an equestrian park and dadicato • groat deal of their property to the trail system. He acid St ned been •ugguted earlier that pouib ly the southern connection would ha eppropriata and he could undsrst and that. Ha supported the trail eyetam and uid ha could support the southern trail. cammiea inner chit iaa noted that the other Commiseionars had indicated shay ware flexible so far ee the location. Commie inner Melchor fait the Commies inane ware saying the applicant could work wlth siatf to coma up with whacevar tra 11 alignment would moat minimally impact LMlr •njoymsnt end use o! the property but that theta should be a troll and it should be now. Planning Commission Minutes -38- December 9, 1997 oooaas Motion: Moved by Val let te, eeeonded by Ch it iea, to adopt the reeo lotion approving Development Review 92-11. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEAr MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMXIS$IONER$: NONE -carried R • • • M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT VI 92 06 RYOBR TRANSPORTATION RESOORCBE - A request to develop a 65,444 square foot warehouse/di et ribut ion building on 3.97 acres of lend in the General Industrial Diatrlct ~SUbarea 14) of the Industrial Araa Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avsnus - APN: 229-331-07. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Steve Hayes, Aaeociate Planner, presented eha staff report. Chairmen McNiel invited public continent. Hark RsdLe, architect, 10300 4th St[aai, Aaneho Cucamonga, expiuud appreciation for an opportunity to eddreaa ins Commission regardSnq the sirs plan. He noted that tM Oaeign Review Committee had exproud concern that vehicular, padesttian, and truck treEf is erase and ors in contl ict. He fsl[ the eras in front of the building hoe sufficient spaces for the amount of office apace they ;re providing including roan for visitors. He noted that the parking Ln [ha back would be for warehouas workers and the truck drivers who would then Da driving company trucks from the facility. He thought it would Da Dotter for iha wareAoues wozlurs and iha eruckecs to perk their vshie lea when xhey arrive at tM mart of their shift end they would than not be leaving tint 11 the end of their anitt, ea [haze would not be a loi of crou- traLflc. Hs did not one le ipata theca would bs many viaitora to the off ice located in ins rear. xa nosed the building msy accommodate two tenants. Hs thought anyone leasing the back office would not have a lot of viaitor^ 6ecauu they would have no visibility. Ha tali [hare would be minimal truck traEEic Dacauu trucks would typically come in antl take ovenl hours to load or off-load. Ns crated that current marketing cond itiona require as msny dock doors a poolbla and Schema B would 6e impractical hecauw it is too deep and would only accommOdaL 13 dock doom. He said it would slao Da exposed to the corner of Santa Anits Avenue and 4th Strwt. He said that Scheme A wouLtl not be workable becaup than woo ltl ba only 37.4 percent bu lid Lnq coverage. Commiaaionar Taletoy felt there would not ba enough truck turning area. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated [hap use not enough apace Ostwnn the vehicle parking and the truck tlocking area. Mr. KadLC stated the spec if LCetion^ met the Industrial Aru Specif is Plan requirements. Howvar, ha uid [M build Lnq depth of approximately 130 Ent would not ba workable. He said Scnama B has only 78 feat of depth in eha main part o! the Duildlnq and would not ba workable and tM arua on the oat and west would not be di netly accuaiDle to truck door and uou ld ba Planning Commission Minutes -)9- December 9, 1991 oona~s RBSOLUTION NO. 92-1i0 A R88OLUTION O! THE PLANNING COMMISSION OP TXB CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DBVELOPNENT REVIEW NO. 92-11 POR A 7,600 SQVARE roOT SINGLE FAMILY AESIDENCB ON 16.6 ACRE$ OP LAND, LOCATED AT 9400 ALMOND STREET IN THE OPEN SPACS DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THSASOP - APN: 1061-a93-O1 A. Aeciia L. (i) Randy ana sandy D•vte nav. filed an appliCat ion fOr the approval of Dn;; slopment Aevlew No. 92-11 as doerlbsd in CM tills of thL Reao lut ion. HerdnafLZ In this Roolutlonr tM eubj act DevQopment Review request L referred to a •th• applicatlon.• (11) On the 9th day of Decead:er 1992, the planning Conmisalon of the City o[ Rancho Cucamonga condutied • muting on CM applic•t ion and concluded •aid meet inq an that data. (iii) All leq•1 prarequisltee prior to tM adoption of Chic Resolution have occurred. 0. Resolution. NON, THBREroRE, it is Mreby [ound, determined, and ruolve0 by the Planning Commiulon of tM Clty of Rancho Cucamonga •. followee 1. ThU CammL•LOn Mreby sps<Lt ically Clods that •11 of U. [acts set forth Ln the Recital., P•Yt A, o[ Chic Ruolutlon u. tru and correct. 2. Bawd upon eubetantial wlduce pnuntW to thl^ Caimsleaion during the above-rete[snced muting on December 9, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, Chic Comeiulon Mrsby apecllictlly [Lode a followse (•) TM applic•t ion •pplles to property loeaLed •t 9100 Almond Strut with a strut frontage of 666 feet and lot deptn of 1,160 het and is pruen[ly improved with • aingh Easily ruLdence) •nd (b) TM property to the north of tM ubjut sib is [hs foothill, CM property to eM south consists of single family ruidmcee and a wuh, tM property to the cut le • wuh and undeveloped lndl and tM property to the weal L • dsuyinq oreMrdj and (c) Slope. grutsr than 19 pereut uiet on • portion of tM sabjwt site. Twelve feet o[ cut (3,990 cubic yards) and a,320 cubic yards of fill are propoud. TM Hillside Development Requlae ions eMntore require P lanninq Comslu ion rwiew •nd approval) end (d) The house Me Men dulgned !n accordance with tM xillalde Development Requ ltlone (PCMC 17.21) a lollowu (.^x'.350 EXh'~b~~t •~ C(~ PLaNNINO COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-150 DR 97-11 - DaVIs December 9, 199: Page 7 (1) No Development is proposed within the scenic Thorpe Canyon area. (]) The hauw and drivways have been e1Ld where the exist inq residence and dsivways ste located to minimise grading. (3) The house he b«n plotted parallel wish the ezL•tinq contours. ({) TM hou« is d«igned wish • split pad, detached q•rage, varied roof elements, and a combination of one- and two-story ele«nts. (5) TM proposed grading mimlca she eietlnq man-made grades on the property. (6) The proposed 6uildinq height ie coneidesaDly below the maximum 30-toot building envelope. 3. sued upon the subetant lal wld«ce pre«nted to this Co®SUlon durLng the show-referenced meeting and upon the speci[le findings of facts et forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 aDow, chic Coaieion hereby fLnde •nd conelud« « follows: (y That the proposed project L co«Ltent with the object Lv« of the General Plan: an0 (b) That eM proposed caw is Ln accord with the objective of the Dwelopment Code and Che purpose of tM dLtrlet in which the errs ie located: and (c) That the proposed ue Ls in coapllance with «ch of the applicable provisions of CM Development Cody •n0 (d) That the proposed ue, LogetMr with the conditions applicable CMreto, will nos W detrimental to the public health, u4ty, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improveents in the vicinity. {. gaeed upon eDe findings and coneluslone sec forth in paragraphs 1, 7, and 3 above, this Coamiuion herby approve the application subject to ech and every condlCion «t forth below and In CM standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by UL reference. puDpjQe Division 1) Rlopss shall W planted Ln accordance with the NL1 Uide Dwelopment Requlat lone (RCMC 17.7{), including, but nos limited to, the tollowinq: !nlormal clusters of tree end eArubs, drought tolerant and fire retarder glee material, and • permanent irrigation system. oonass PL/1NNIN6 CONlII SSION RESOLUTION NO. 92_t5J DA 92-11 - DAMS DecemWr 9, 199T Page 3 T) All elopes shall be designed with variety in •lop gradLni, wherever iwuibU, and hard edges rounded oft (1. •., at top/tu of elope, or major direaClonU change). 3) Retaining wa1L shall W terraced and wparated by a minimum of 3 lace of landscaping. No individual wall shall exceed 4 tact in height on the upalope, nor exceed 3.5 tNt Ln Might on the downalope. 6) The interceptor drain, at the cop of the elope above tM house, shall W "natuzali:ed" with native cock or colored concrete. 5) My removal of heritage trees atoll require submittal and approval of • Tree Removal Pezsit per the Tree Prewrvation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08). 6nminNrins Division 1) A Ilan agreewne shall G recorded toe she future conetruM ion o[ Almond Street Leprovemants, including A.C. pavement, curb and queer, street lights, street trees, storm drainage Le11Lt1ea, • draw approach, and a parkway Coeswnity Trail to the eatletaetlon of GM City Engineer. T) EaaeeMntl for po[tione of the Comwnlty Trail placed outride the public right-o[-way shall W dedleated to the City wMrever they encroach onto private property. 3) since A1JJand Street lmprovement• are not being SnetQied at this time, temporary Community Trail improvements shall W located aitRln tM Almond Jtreet right-o[-way, a close to their ultimate allq,wnt a Le physically ponibU given the exiting topography. IneCall limited trail improvsrnte, to tM eaeietsetion of the City Pinner and Clty Engineer, a lolloweJ •) ESnlmum [call surface width shall W 10 feet, within a 20-toot uaeamnk Lf outside CRe public rigRt-oLway~ b) Native soil sRSll W graded to Community Troll Kandarde wiU rocks end weeds removed) oooasz PLANNING COMMISSION ARSOLVTION NO. 92-150 DR 92-11 - DAMS DwemWr 9, 1991 Page 6 e) Provide fencLnq only where eteap channel •lopea fall away Erom the trail edge, in arua not auDjact to flooding; d) Connect to the axLtinq Community Trail on Lot a of Tract 11616 along the war project boundary; •) Provide • vehicle gale with •ide aceeu, Coward the easterly terminus of the proposed Co®unlly Troll, located and/or special ly designed to minialze damage due to storm waters to tM aatiafaet Son of tM City Engineer. 4) In the event that Almond 9CrNt improvesenb are ineialled in the Curare, portions of the trail adjacent to A1moM street shall M reconstructed u • minimum width Parkway Community Trail within the existing right-o[- way. If additional right-of-way le nwowry to accaamxodate • vehicle 9aea wish aide aeceu on tM war side of tM project driveway, LC shall G dedicated at Ghat time. Bulldlnm i 9tfety Division 1) Provide elope setback an nortR aide of house per ordinance 411 (U!C! and pools Lve drainage around house. 1) A final wiL report and geology report are required prior to issuance of gradinq and building permits. Sold reports shall include elope qudient, hslgh! of slope, load inteneily, and erosion characterLtie• of elope material. lire Satsiv DLVLion 1) Sabmit • hel modi[icat ion plan and a fire detenw plan prior to Suuanee of gradinq and building permlia. 1) fire flow raquirewnt .hall W ],000 gallons per m1nuG. A Lirs flow shall G conducted by tM applicant and witnuasd by fire department pmrwnnsl Drlor to water pLn approval, altar oonacruction, and prior eo occupancy. 000353 PLANNING COMMISSION REsOLUi ION NO. 92-150 DR 9Z-11 - DAMS Deeember 9, 1992 Pegs 5 3) Biro hydrants will be required. Ex toting fire Hydrant locations eh all be provitled prior to water plan approval. substandard hydrants sM11 be upgraded to meet Fira District standards. All required publie or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivery of sny combust ibla building material' on •Lw (L.e., lumber, rooting matsrLL, etc.). Hydrant flushing shell be vitnesssd by fire dapsrtment personnel. 4) Hydrant ref lactlvs markers (blue dots) shall W requited Eor all hydrant' end Lnstalled prior to final inspection. 5) M automatic fire extinguish inq syasem(s) will be required per Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protlct Lon District Ordinance 15 and Rancho Cueaswnga Ordinance 436. 6) sprinkler system monitoring must be installed and operas tonal ismeAiaeely upon completion of sprinkler systems. 7) All roadways wlthtn pro]ect shall comply with Pi re District's firs lam standards. e) All cress planted Ln any mWian shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14 Net 6 inches from the ground up ao a not to Lmpede [ire appar+tue. 9) A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prio[ to final lmpectlon. Proof of purchue shall G suMolttsd prior to final Du tiding plan approval. Contact tM fire DLtrict for speeitic Oeta1L and ordering lnformat ion. l0) Gated/restricted entry(e) require Lnetal let ion o[ a Knox npld entry key system. 13) A tenant uo letter shall be ecDmitted prior to final building plan approval. spec lei permit' may b+ required depending upon intended use. 12) Add Ltlonal plan check [ne 'hall be paid prior to eater plan approval •nd prior to fiml plan approval. SeparaN plan cheek tees for fire probctlon systems (sprLnkLra, eLrme, etc.) and/or any consultant revleva will be auuesd upon submittal of plans. C;~f1354 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 92-i50 DR 92-11 - DAVIS Dfcfmbfr 9, 1992 Pa9f 6 5. Thf Swrftary to ehit CammiuLon shall cfrtify to thf adoption of thin Afaolutlon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TN DAY OP OECEMEER 1992. PLANNING :%N~MISSION OP THE CITY O! AANCHO CUCAMONGA Bred I, Brad BulUr, sforftary o[ ehf Planning CaaoLdoa Of thf Cley of 14ncho Cucamonga, do harfby cartlfy that tha forfgoinq Rfaolution wu duly and rfquLtly intraducfd, puafd, and adoptfd by thf Planning Conn..luion of ehf Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, at • rfqular mNtinq Of tM Plannlnq CawoSULOn hfld on thf 9th day Of Ofcaad:fr 1992, by thf followlnq vob-to-wit: AYES: COl01ISSIONERS: CHITIPA, MCNIEL, MEL,CHER, TOL3IDY, VALLETfE N068: COMMI88IONE113: NONE ABSENT: COMMI38IONEAS: NONE C0035S ~o~~ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ~Qp~fl~~~~~~~°°aA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT p: J/^ / Z SUBJECT: U/Ji~ ~C ~ Go r~L~.G~ APPLICANT: ~ Z LOCATIONS r~n' NIOOO~ ~~ I O~ Those items checked are CAfaalOna of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (711) aeiia6l, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOU.OWING CONORIONS: A. Tlme LImNe X t. Approval shall expire, unless eMendea w IM wannxp Correnfasbn, N buildup pemits are rot issued or approved use has rat conlmencedwNhin 24 nanlhs Nom the date of approval. 2. Deveb{xnenVDespn Review ehaN be approved prior a / / 3. Approval al TemalNe Traq No. b praMed sugect b the approval of The devebper shah commence, paRidpate in, andoorieummete orcause b be commenced, paRbipated in, or consummated, a Melb-Roos Cormunily FadNlbs DMrlct (CFD) for the Ranch Cuwrtarpe Fire Protegion Obtriq to Nnarxx oorrelrogion arrdror maintenance of a lire staton to serve IM dwebt7rrbnt. The slatfon shall W boated, desiprtad, and W iN to all spacsicatbns d the RarcM Ctrcarrartpa FNe PrMSgbn Dbtriq, aria Shah Deume the '~ Oistrbt's propeRy upon mrtrplalbn. The eWipntent shah bs saleged q' the Distrq in accordance with es needs. In arty buibNq of a station, IM developer sheN cortlply wah all al'7Wicabb laws and ret7ulalbna. The CFD shaa W bmbd W the Datricl and the developer W' iM lima recordaton d IM Nnal map occure. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of bu:IdNp pameta, whichever comes lust, the applicant shall Wneertl lo, or paRbgata NI, the setedbhmeM of a Melb-Roos Communiy FacilNbs Dbtriq for iM oonatnafbn and maintenance of necessary school IacilNies. However, N any school district has peviousy eatebNShsd such a Community FaCilNies District, the alnt shah, in the etlemetNe, COtteaM b the annexatbn of the projeq sRe into the tenaory of such exiatfrp Distriq prbr to the reoordetbn of the linal map or the issuartns of drildhp pemau, whbMvar mrtlee lirsl. FuRhsr, N the aNeged school district has rat loaned a McNo•Roos Corrmuniry FaCiNIbS Qie1M.R within twelve months Irom the date of approval of the project and poor to the reoordai!dn of the line) map or issuance of taiairp permits for said propq, fhb oonddbn shah Da deemed nuN and void. S~-ac -/_/- J~_ JJ- J~- J~- QQ~JrJF) SC~7/91 for 17 ~,~,a..~e J.¢9a-rl Gm,deeoe D.,c 1Tis corMitbn shall be waived N the City receives notice that the applicant and all amecled school distnds have entered iMO an agreement to privately axommodate any and all school inpacts a5 a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or pror to issuance o/ twibing pemntts when ra map is irnolved, written certNicatbn Irom the aNected water dstrict that adequate sewer antl water facilNies are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community DevebpmeM. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prbrto final map approval inihe case of subdivisbn orpriorto issuance of permis in me case of all other residential projects. 8. SNe DevebpmMt t . The SNe shall be devebprU and maintained in accordance wNh the approved putts which include silo plans, archttndural ebvatbre, exteAOr materials arM cobra, larrdseapirp, sign Program, and grading on file in the Palming Divfeion, the Condttbrts contained herein. DevebpmeM Code regulations, and Specifb Plan and Planned Cammuniy. 2. Prior to arty use of the project sae or bueirMSa aaNiry betttp cortanenrMd thereon, all Contlttions of Approval shall be completed ro the 58iMlabtlbrl d tIM CMy Planner. ._~ 3. Ocurpancyolthe ladlNy shah notcortxnerlce untNwGtlims es allUnilortn Buildatg COdeaM State Fire Marshall's regulations have been WmpIIBO wNh. PMr to adclgancy, plans shah be submitted to the Rancho Clxartbrga Flre Praedbrt DieUkY and the BuNdrlg and Safety ~. Division ro show compliance. The buiMStg ehaN ba Ntspeaad for compliance prbr to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and'heiMeyekvetiersircarporetMtp aN CondNbrM of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prbr ro issuance of buiWirtg pem>tts. 5. All site, grading landscape, irtpatbn, shBN OecooMinated for Consistency priorto issuance of any permis j8uM1 as grading, tree fBrtbval, encroachment. building , etc.l. or prbr to linal map approval In IM case d a astom bt Subdivision, or approved use nos comnMrroed, whbMvarmmes lust. 6, Approval of this request shall not waive anNNie!tce wiM ell aectiorM of ihs Oevsbpment Code, all Other applicable CNy OrdirMrleas, and appMcabb CommunNY Plans or Spedlic Plans in eNect at the time of Builtlirtg Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on•stte IlgMirtp plan shah be reviewed and approved try ihs CNy Planner and SherSl's DepaAmem (989-8811) pnor ro tM issuance of buiWNtq perrtliM. Such plan shall indicate style, illuminalbn, br;atbn, haigM, and mathnd of shieWirtg so ae not to adversely aNed adjacent properties. 8, If noceMrelked trash receplaGes are provided, aNtrash pidtapshall befarindividualuntta wtth all receptacles shielded from public vgw. 9. Trash receptacle(s) ate requirtld and shBN meal CNy slarMarde, TIM IirMl design, bcations. and the number of trash receptaces shall be ttubjsct to CNy Planner review and approva~. prior to issuance of DtliWNtp permits, 10. All ground-mouMeO utility appuAenaneas Such a6 Iranslortnere, AC Condensers, etc., shat be orated out of pulNb view artd adequatey scroened throtph the use of a combination o concrete or masonry walls, bemirq, ardor landscapirtp to the satfslaAbn of the CNt Planner. JJ- JJ JJ_ J-J- JJ- J-J- _I_.J- J_J_ JJ- ~J- ~~- 0003'7 5< ~ 1/91 Z of 17 ~m~,., D,¢ 9~..-rr „o,,,d.~a, o.~ 1 t, Street nartles shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All Wikfirg numbers and individual units shall he identNied in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 73. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, mazinum sbpes, physical coMNbns, fendrg, and weed comrol, in accordance wdh City Master Trail Orawugs, shall be submitted for City Planner reviewaM approvalpriorto approval and reaoNalbnotthe FktalTrad Map and prior to approval of street inlproventern and grading pins. Oevebpershall upgrade and construct all trails, including lancing aM drainage devices, in conjunctbn wNh street improvements. 14. The CAVBnams, CondNions bt owners in subdivbions shah have the option of keepkgsak animals wlthoulme rbcasssy of appealing to hoards of directors or twmeownet' at:sociatbns for amendmems to the CCBRS. t 5. The Covenants, Condabns, and Restrictions (CC6RS) and ArNUes of Incoryoratbn of the Homeowners' Associatbn are subject to the approval of the Pbrvwrg and Engineering Divisbra ano the CNy Adomey. They shall De recorded CMnalmenlly with Ure Foal Map or prior to the issuance of W ildlrg pemNls, whichever acorn final. A recorded copy shall ba provided to the City Engineer. t s. All pancways, open areas, arW brWSCapirg shah Oe pennanerely mainlabed Oythe ProPeM owner, homeownere' association, or char mearo arxxptabM to tM CNy. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall t>a suMneNed for CNy Planner and CNy Engineer review and approval poor to issuance of building permit. t 7. Solar access easemens shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each bt or dwelling unit shall nave the rqM to receWe sunlight aerosn adjacerN kas or units for use of a solar energy system. The easemeraa may be coreaktW in a DecWratbn of Reatrldbns for the subdivisbn which shall be retoroad CofloURemly with the reCOfdBtiorl of the Nnal map o1 issuance of permNS, whichever comes first. Ths easements shah prohlbN the casting of shadows M' vegetation, stmclurae, Ihrlurea or arty other objaq, excaq for utlNty tykes antl similar objegs, pursuam b l)evebpmem Cade Secdon 17.OB.O60~G-2. t a. The project contains a dr3pnated Hiabrieal landmark. The Bile shall he davebped and mairnained in acwroarlce with the Historic Landmark ANSrelbn PemtN No. . Any further modOicalioM to tfts sae incMrdinO, Dul rtol Amited to. exterbr aNeratiort andror irnerbr aaeratkxtwhbh a1lecTtM exlarbrol the buNdrgsorstnulures, removal of tndrnark trees, demolNbn, rebcation, reoonstnrctbn of buddirps or StNdurea, or charges to the sde, shalt require a moddicalbn b the Historic Landrrenk ANaralbn PemNt wbject to Httorb Preservatbn Commission review and approval. C. euhding Design 1. An alternative energy system b required to provide domestic hot water for all dwellkg unal and for heating arty swimming pool or spa, unbss other aaemativa energy syatams are demonstrated to be of equivabm capacity andsMiciency. All svimnNlg poobinsreNed al the hmB of initial devebpmenl shah be supPlememad wiM solar heating. Details shall br included in the huikkg port and shall be stNxtrilted for CNy Penner review an0 approve prbr to the issuance o1 bulking pertnNs. 2. All dwellings shall have the Imnt, side and rear ebvatbna upgraded wah architeClura treatmem, detailing and incree6ed delineatbn of surl8ce treatnMnl subject to CNy Panne review and approval prbr to issuance of 6uiklrg permNS. _ /-J- JJ- JJ- J~- J~- J-J- J~ J-J- J-1- ~-/-- SC .1rBl don l9 Q~r3+~h{~.' P~.~~.o pi1 y1-~r Cundm.„ o.~c 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the flonleownens' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and BuNditg Official review and approval prior to issuance of building pertnNs. 4. All roof appurtenances, ifldnxxfirrg an contlXbnere and other roof mounted equipment aMror projedbns, shall be shielded from view argtM sound buttered Irom adjaceMproperties and streets as required by the Planning Divisbn. Such screening shah be arctritecturaay imegratetl wah the brihJirg design and corfstruded to tM satisladbn of the City Planner. Details shall be irrdWed in Ouiltleg plans. D. Parklnq and Vehbular ACnMfe (IndlCale deWb On bulNllnp plans) f . All parking bt larltlacape glands shah Mve a miMrnum oNSitle tlimerfsion of B lest arM shall wMain a 12-inch wok adjacent to the parking staN (infcNrdirg arD). 2. Texturetl pedestrlen p«fn+ays antl texNred pavemero across ekculatbn asses shall be providedthrougMullM Aevelolxnera to coNrectdwaNkgyurilalbuiklagawiM Open spaces/ plazas/recraational used. 3. AIt parking spaces shah be doubb striped per CNy standards and aN dMeway aisles, emrances, and exits Shan ba slrged par city starMarda. 4. All unNS sMll ba provitled wNh garage do« opanere N ddveways are bs6 than IB leaf in depth from bads of sidewalk. 5. TheCovanams, Condiliorl6 arM Rsatrbtbru ahaN reatACllM ataagadrecreatbnal vehbks on tfas sae unbss tfK+y are iM pdrwipal source d tranaportatbn f« IM owner and protabN parking on interior droulatbn ahlan «her than In rissipneted vbXOr parklrg aroas. 6. Plans for arty securtty gates sMN f>e submmsd ror IM CNy Plamfer, Clly Erglneer, and Randy Cucamonga Fire Proteditln Obtrld review ant approval prlorb Iswance d WNdirg pennNS. E. LantlscNPlnp (far publlety malnalMd Mndagpe any, nIM ro 3aCt10ri N.) ~1. Adetailed larxlscape and kdpatbn plan,IrfcNrdirgsbpelAaMingandntodeltgmeWndscap- inq in tM case of IsaideMial OsvebprtMro, ahaN M preparetl by a Neensed lardacape arohNerxantl wbmmed br CNy Planner ravlewandappnwal prlorro tM bsuanaaa,iaing permss or prior line) map appoval In tM cans of a custom bl eubdNiebn. 2. Existing troes requirodtoWPraaarvedbplaes shaNWpnMSdetlwehaconMmCtlon bender in acoordancswiMiM MunldpalCode Sedfon 19.08. t t0, and e0 raledontM padrgplam. The Iocatbn W those Uses to W preeeNed In place and new bcatbru f«tramplanled treed shall be sfbwnonlMdeteibd laridacape putts. life appNcara ahaNfalbw aX d tM eAOdst's feComRMndatlpnS raQardllg proasNelion, lnnapgnlinp and IdmmNq rlletfl0ds. 3. Aminimumol Ifeea pergrose acre,compdaWrNtMfONOwtng s@n,sMNbeprovided wdhintM projeq: Y.•48-inch box «larger, 14-38-ktch box or Wrger -- ~ - 2{- inch box or larger, _ Y. - 15-gaNOn, and _ X • 5 galbn. 4, A minimum of Y. of trees Izlamed wiMin the projaG shah M specimen sire Ireas 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within padrinq lots, Ines shalt be planted et a rats d one 15-galbn tree for every three parking stalb, suHieiem to shade BOK d IM parking area at solar noon on August 21. OOR:i 50 J~- J~_ JJ- J~- J-!_ JJ_ JJ- JJ- J~- _J-/- ___/~- J~- ___J~ SC ~ 4/91 { o! IN Trees shall be planted in areas of puGb view adjacent to artl abng structures a1 a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 1C 7. All prNate sbpe barsc95feetorless in vertical height and of 5:t orgreatersbpe, butlers than TT~~ 2:1 sbpa, shall be, at minimum, irrigaletl arW landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope plaMirlp required try this section span include a pemlanem irrigatbn system to be instaged q' the tlevebper prior ro ocwparlcy. -i1L-a. Agprivate sbpesinexcessot5feet,but lesstllan8 feet invertical heghl andof 2:l orgreater /~ sbpe shall be landscapetl ant irrigated for erosion caMrolandto sogenthek appearance as folbws: one 15-galbn or larger s¢e tree per each 150 sq.11. of sbpe area, tyalbn or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. h. of sbpe area, and appropriate grourldcover. In additon, sbpe banks in excess of 81ee1 in vertieal height and of 2:1 orgrealer sbpe shall also krclude one 5-galbn or larger size Iree per each 250 sq. h. of sbpe area. Trees and snnrDs stroll be plaMetl in staggered Gustero ro sohen antl vary sbPe plane. Sbpe plantlng required by tlgs section snap inGuda a permanent inigatbn system ro De instaged by the devekger prbr ro oaupancy. 9. For single ramify resitlemial Oavebpment, aq sbpe plaMktg ant impatbn ahaN be cOMinu- ousy maintained in a heaAtryarftlthdvirlgcorldgbn . Priorto robastrrp oorayanryfarMOeeurMta, aninspectbn shah be corrductetl by tfle Planning Division to determine ttltl they ero b segalaclory condgbn. 10. For multi-gamily residential and non-residential devebpmsnt, property owners are respon- sible for the cominual mairgenarlce Of aq landscaped arose on-sqe, as weA as wMiguoua '~ palmed areas wAhin the public rpM-ol-way. M IarMSCaped arose atWA be kept tree from weetls and debris arW mairaainetl in a heaAhy and thm'ing oondmon, and shall receive regular pruning, (ertigzirlp, rmwinp, arq kkmwtg, poly damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plats material shah De rapaced wghin 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yam IaMSCapirlq shop be required per the Devabprttent Code and /o! . This requiromeM shag be in addition to tM requketl street trees and sbpe plantktp. 12. The final desgn of the perimeter parkways, wags, Wrtdscaprlp, and sidewalks shell be included in tM required lartdecaps plain and 6hpq G sublets to CNy Planner review antl approval and coordkleted brtxxlsratsrlq with ant padcway landscaping plan which may bs required by the EngiMSM1p Division. 13. Special landscape IeaWres such se rtburldrq, agtrvial rock, aPecinlen size trees, meander- ing sitlewagcs (wqh horizontal chargel. antl gasnsgiW IarWecapgq, f6 requked abng 1 a. Lantlscapirtq and impatbn syaterre requbetl ro bs irgtalNd wghln its pubec dgntcl-way on the perimeter a this propct aroa shah be cominpuay maiMalnW M the Oevebper. 15. All walls shall be providetl wghdaooralhro troaltnaM. H located M puDNC maintenance areas, IhB desgn shah be coordtnaled wgfl the E1lpkteeArtg D"M61on. 16. Tree maimenarlce crosrfa bMN W devebped ono atrbnwted for CAy Planner review and approval prior ro iaauarlce of eugdktp permits. These cMeda atoll encourage the natural growth charagartetica of the salaried Ires apecNa. 17. Landscapirp and inigatbn snap tx osspneo ro conxrve water through the principles of Xenscape as tlelined b Chapter 19.18 M the Rarlcfro Cucamonga Municipal Code. Q®r3Gn D.e yi-l/ JJ_ JJ_ JJ_ JJ_ JJ_ J~_ ___/-/_ J~- -JJ_ JJ_ J-/_ -/.__/_ 9C ~ 4/91 a of 17 F. Sena t The signsiraicated ontMSUbmilted plans arecorx;elMUatonly and rotapanol this aPDroval. Arty serfs proposed for this development shall mrrpty wan the Sign Ordinance aM shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto instalWtion of any signs. 2. AUnaorm Sign Program for this devebpmern shall Da submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to issuance of 6uildirlg permas. 3. Directory monumem sign(s) shalt be provided br apertrtnrn, condominium, or towntames prior to occupancy and shall require separate applkatbn and approval by the Planning Divison prior to issuance of Wrildirg permhs. G. Environmental t. Thedevebpershallprovide each prospective boyar written notice of the FOUM Street ROCk Crusher project in a staraaW format as delemxrnd by the City Planner, prbr to accegirg a cash deposit on any property. i 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wraten notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone forme Red HiN Fauh, in a standard lomtat as dBtermatetl by the City Planner, prior a acceptirq a cash depoaN on arty property. 3. The developer shah provide each prospective Duyer written notice Of the FooMal Freeway Protect in a standar0 format as determined by IM Chy Planner, prior to accepirp a rash depose on aM WoPeM~ ~, a. A final acoustical report shall ba submined for City Planner rev"iew arq approval prior to the issuance of lwibing pemNts. The final report shah dlBCU58 the level of interior raise adenuatbntoOebwaSCNEl,theWiltlargmatenaleand mnstructbntechniquesprovided, andR appopiate, verily the adequary of the mNgatbn meawrea. The Wribirp pans win ba cnedced for cornormance wah tM rritigalbn measures oornained b the linal report. H, Other Apenclee t. Emergency semntlary aaase shall De providadbaaoNancewah Rancho CUrartarpa Fire Protection District Slarxl8rda. ~tt~ ;,.. ~J- JJ_ JJ- J___/_ J-/_ _/-/- ~_/_ JJ- JJ- J~- JJ_ 2. Emergercy accesashall Deprovided, matrnenarxx tree and cbar,amlmmumof 281eetwide at an times dump WrtalrUCtlbrl in adCOrdaflG wah Rancfa Cucamonga Fire Protectbn District requirements. 3, Prbr to issuance Of buildutp pemNta for combuetibb oorutNCtbn, evidence shall be submaletl to tin Rancho Curartanga Firo Protecton Dielrfq that Ismporary water suppty for Lire protecYbn is available, perWkp corttplstion of raquaad fire txolactbn system. a. me applbam shall comae the U. S. Postal Service b detsmNns tM appropnata type and bcatan of maN Doxes. Muhi-lamity reaidarnlal Oevsbpmerna mall provide a solid ovedread slnxYUre for mail boxes wan adequate NgMafg. The final bcadon of tin mall boxes and the desert of ttn ovedMad stntcarra shah bs subjeq to Ciry Planner review arW approval prior to the issuance of buildup permits. -~5, For projects using septic tank lacilales, wmten ceANicalbn of atxeplabilay, including all supportive irnormatbn, snail be ogained from the San BemerOira Coumy DepanmeM of i Environmernal Heahh and submated to Ina Buildup Ollbial prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permds, and prior to issuance of buibinq pertrits. J_/_ sc - xis I ear ~IDR'.i4i1 c.~d~oe„ o.~~ APPLICANTS SMALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (71a) 9e9•te63, FOA COMPLIANCE MBTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITK)NS: 1. She DevebpmaM t. Theapplicant shallmnply wah the latest adopted Uriilorm Buibirq Coda, Urdlorm Mechani- J-1- CJ cal Coda, Uniform Plumoing Code, Natbnal EleUric Code, and aN other applcable miles, ordinances, and regulations in seed at the time of issuance of relatNe pemxts. Please mrnaa the Building and Safety D'vision for co{Nes of the Code Adoplbn Ordinance aM applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of budding pemxts for a new reebensel rlwaWrq urdl(s) of mayor addhion JJ- to existingune(s),the appdcarxshad paydevebpmemfeesat theestaDMahedrate. such teas may inckxJe, but are not dmietlto: City Beau6licalbn Fee, Park Fse, Drainage Fee, Syslerns Devebpmem Fee, Pemdt and PWn Chedcktp Fees, and 3ctrool Fees. 3. Prior to issuarxxa W building pertnile for a new mrrene2tlal or IMustdal davebpmem ar J-J- additbn to an exi6tirq devebpmsM, itq appdeant shall pay devabpmem lees at the estadisfred role. Such lees maY irrClude, 6ul are nd limbed b: Syeterre Developnlern Fee. Drainage Fee, Sclbol Fees, Permd and PWn Chgckirq Fees. a. Street addresses shall be provided bytM &ribitq Olfieial, allertraCVpan:el map recordation JJ- aM prior to issuance of buildlrg pemlae. J. Exllting SIruLluru 1. Provide mrrydarrce with the Uneortn Budding Cods br the property IMe cbarances I J~- considenrlp use, area, and lire-resietlveMSe of exblinp drildklpe. 2. Existing dlil0irga shall be made to comply web correct 6uibbq afld zoning regulations for JJ- the imerMed use or ffb buibirip shah lxe demGkshed. i 3. ExisYirgsewa~edleposallagplbsshaMlMremoved,lilbdartdrorcappedtomrtplywiththe J-J- Undorm Plumbing Code arM Uneonn Buildirlp Code. d. Underground on-sits utllNbs are to bs boated and albwll on 6uildkip plans stlbnrilted for J_1- buibing perme appdcation. K. Gndlnq / 1, Gradirq of IM sul2pcY prbpsrly shall bs b acmrdarbe wdh the UMbnn Buddirip Cade. City -~-~- Gradirq Slartduds, arM aecepted 9fadwq pratdioes. The tlnel gfadbq plan shall be in substantial coreonnartce with the apgwsd grading p4n. 2. A soils report shah he prepared by a quaklied efgineer licarlaed by tIM State of CBldomia to -J-~- pertonn such woAt. 3. The devebpmers is baled wdhkf the soil erosion rbntrol Douneahea; a Sod Disturbance J-J- Perma H requked. PNasebaaaa Sin SarrorddbCounty Dep7rlrrNrd of Apkuduro at (714) 3s7-27 f 1 lorpemil appdCelbn. Doarrtimtahon of such pemkl shad he sutxnilled tothe City prior to ihs iswanbe o1 rough grading pemW. 4. A geobgical repon shad be prepared by a QtlalNbd engineer or ptbbglet and suDmthed at -J--l- ~ the lime OI applicalbn for gradirq plan chedt. J / 5. ThefkWlgradirq plans shall Oecortgkted and approved pAOrbiesuance of buiblrtppermds. _. - 00~'3G2 SC ~ 2/91 70f 12 ..,~..~tiR 9Z9Z-// ~.,~ 6. As a wslolRbt subdivision, the folbwirg requiremerds mall M me;: a. Surary anal Ds poelstl and an agreement executed quaromesinq corryktion of all on-sire ~ J~- droinags hCiligOa necessary ror dewgervq all paresk to tM satilfadifdn o1 tM Building and Satery Oiviabn priorto final map approval and pdor to the nwancs of gradirq penNts. D. Appropriate easemeras for sale disposal d drainage water Mq are colluded orso JJ- or over adjacem parcels, aro to M deaneged and recorded ro tM satbtadion d tM Buibing and Safery Divisbn prbr to iseuanp of gradkq and dlildirq pem:ta. c.On-sne drainage improvsmsras, rleesseary for dswatsrkq aril protedktq tM subdivided J-J- propeAiee, aro to M imtaaad prbr to issuanu d lusdktq parrMls for corcArudbn upon arty parcel that may W subject ro drainage fbvn araerkp, Navetp, or walsn a parcel relative ro which a 6uildkq W rMl it requeged. d, Final grading plans I« aacn parch are to W submilled b IM BuiNirp and Safety I JJ- DNiebn lorapproval prbr to usuanu of 6uiMatg and Qadhtp perrriro. (Thll may W on an inderMrtrol «corrpoaite balls.) s. All 6bpe WrWS M sxcelt OI S leg ro veftlesl Migrll lnaa be ceded wah naave aaeles J~- «panf Wwan ground coverbr erosron carol uponodrtpNlron W gradstp «eame omsr aaemgM mghod d erolioncoMrol Thal tM cmtplged to the agMladbna tM Bulldlrq Ollidal. In addabn a Pen^aMnt wrggbn lygem loss De provNW. Tlaa repuirernem doss nol reNaee tM applicantrdevebpsr from oompaana wall ale pope gaming rsQuiroments d Sedbn 77.08.010 I d tM DwaWplfwM Coda. APPLICANT SNALL CONTACT THE ENOINEFJIMIG OIVIBION. f71q aM18sa, FOR COSiLIA/ICE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONORION3: L. Dedkadon arq VMkular Aeews 7, Rplas-ol-way and eaMmsrNS 117sa a dsAealsd b IfN CNy for Y sasll0r public greed, JJ- comminily trails, pubic pesos, pubae WbwaPa areal, groel ttNa, artd pupae Drainage facilNMa as shown on fM gam anN« tefaatlw map. Rivals saaarmtaa for non-prbMc ladMtias Iaosa•bt dainaps, peal Isatlar traW, qc.) ahaa a rlsarvl0 as aMwn an ma gam ana« tamghn map. 2. Oedicafion sMll De made o11M bbwinp rlgfaao4way On tl7a paMtgar grass I J~- (meawnd from atrM ta1lMlsrM~: lolsl teat On te1tY fast on lelal lesl erl tail feq on 3. An imvocabNdflrW0ldlealionf« dadwldarbadwayeaaarflarttaf7a11bemade I J-~- f« a8 prNalep~ps «dflws. 1. Nonatmiallar aeoaY loss W dadkatW t0 tlN CMy IOr 0M (ONOwMp alraga: I JJ 5. RaclpotalacGSaeaslmems snaabaprovfdWemuhgagasaba0puab by CCBRS j J-.'-_ or by deeds ar7d shwa W rseprdad oDneumrMy with tM rr4p «pAa to its nwar7a of bulroinp pamMt, wMro ro map N imo1vW04~::63 x :rel eer ~ -.. Dr~gi-ll f. r~' f~-'uaa' `.r 6. Private aainage easehlemsforcrosa-bt Drainage shalloe provded anD Shalloe Delineatetl or noted On the linal map, - - . 7 The linal map ahaN cNady delkMate a t 0-loot minimum iwigirg rexrictbn area on the neigmm~rrp bt aW~oNkrq iM zero bl line waN ant Contain the folbwing brpuags: 'lhYe Mrsby dedicaM to tM Cpy of Bantle Cucnrlorga tla nqM to pronioil tlrs ronstruaion al (reaidsrrfial) OuNtlirga (or Omer sWCturos) wiflrin teats arose Oeagnarad an me mqo as twlMinp -sarnYtion seas.' A maintenance agreement chap also W premed lrom each bl to iM adpcsM bl through the CCdR's. a. All eriating saaemeras yirq within lulus dglrtt-a-way slWlbe puadaNneOOr daNnsaletlon the final map. 9. Easements for pubpc sidawaks artdor sleet trees plead oubioe IM pudic right-ot-way shag M da0icated to me City wMrsver ploy erldoach ora0 pMab property. t 0. Addpbnal6lreft rigMcf-way shad W dedbated abrq rlgMtum boas, b provide a minimum 01 71sN measured hom tM ha of ar0a. a Curb agaant awewalk b atop abrq lM right tam lane, a paralbl easel tree mtlMerrarree earmeM aMt W provldW. t t. The Owagper shah make a goodlaahsllorl q aryuaeRw nqukadall-Ae property iraerasta nacesaary q oorWnla tlh nrauWd pudk inpgveranb, and M ha/ttre stglad lap to do so, the dewbper shah, al bast t 20 days prbr b flrOrrMlal p IIb w1Y map IOr appmval, erpsr into in BgrNRNra q arrpbte iM NnprovwMnls ptanlarR p li0verlartart Coot Seaion 68182 at strchdme aatM City aaguirestMpropxty YasmbtaWfndlorlM intprwmtatss. such agnemera shall povide qr payer By ttte dwetopera a Dote Nraxr.d M the cay to aoguirotMoR-site properly krbrMt n4tlirad inoomepbntath tlb tuOdlNtlon. SaaMy ror a ponbn d thew costs aftaN a n Itr brm a a ash Mpost b iM amount 9Men in an appaiaal report odakled bN ttre Oevebper, at devabpya Ooat. TM appraber fhaN have been approval OY iM Cpy prbr b consnertcentera a tM apprabat. M. StnN knprovernerNa _~ 1. All pudic improvembMt (IrINdW prNta, ikatlapa facYtlbt, OOrMalhtly iwW, patent, bndtcapW anraa, etc.) tll0tnl Oh the ptrb altdbr leraatlw map ahY W conalnraad h Cpy Sbrbarda. Iraerbr preN imprOVMNrtt that ilttdtrde, Out are n01 tllrNtd b. aA ark puller. AC pawmam. drM tppmatfbs, aldtwab, aRaat Apttt, aru peel ItNt. 2. Aninknumd26-loot wba pawmerM, wllNna~O-loot widt dadkalad dpM-W-way shaNd cahatruatd for w hw-tetllbn oleos. ~_ 3. Carolers Vla bbwMtq pMNNIM !fM IriprpwrlNltt pICA10p1Q, OtA rt01 tl11WW 10: SittEEi' NAa2 CURB l ot/rrtR AC, Pvwr tmi w,ux DRIVa: APlR tlOtfi3 lIIIQy 7Tti6 COa0/. flWL ro1.1ND 0711lR C~ JJ_ J~_ ~~- JJ- JJ_ JJ_ ~~_ ~_/_ sC • 1/91 90(11 QOtll.i64 -._..~ .~DLgZ-~I Notm: la) Median island includes la ~°'~ ndsoagrg and imgalion on meter Ib) Pavement reCOrrSINCibn and dyenay3 WIII N Ceterminal dunrg plan Check. (tj N so markfd, s~e- wak SMN N arvilbau par STD. 30e. (d) Il so maMal. an in-lieu of conMruc,bn lee shall ~, N provided for this NSm.~ FF~R ~b ~PECI At_ uwol n•t~ ~ 4. Improvement plane arld oorMruction: a. Sireel ingrovamenl plena irrokrdirrq streN trees and btraN IlplNS. pnparad M a regia- JJ- tered Civil Erlgirw•r, shall N SubnNlal b and approval W •la CNy Engin•ar. SaarNy anaN N postal arld an agr••rtrsM aaaWtal to eta aadWaction a tln City Erprlasr and tM CNy Mom•y ouarants•irlg conpistion a tM tarENC arler« pMaa atr••t krprova- menta, prior to final map approval «tM isauarru d hulldNtq pamkls, whioMvar occurs first, b. Prbr b ary work Nine p•dOmral b puDlb dpM-0l-way.1••a shr N paid and a J-J- corrotrudbn p•rmN snaN N oMaktal hom dra CNy Errpal••re O•b• in arbNbn b any aner p•rrtan repuwal. c. PavmMt sldpkq, madtkrp, trams, atgN nW,N alprwq, ono NN•roonlact mnduN JJ- shaN N ingaMd b tM aatWacdon a Nu CNy Erlpn••r• d. SipnalcaauNwahpuNN7rah•NNinpradonanyrrwoorrstnreaon«r•oonetrutdbn J.J_ a mapr, s•mraary «ddsact« atnata wheh bt•rsap wah om•r mty«, a•coraary Or CONaG«!Va•ta r« lulus tratlb aiprWa. Pria Nar ahr N paoal On IIOm aide a aN siro•tat 3la•IaaaiW aBCR, ECq«anyaMrbcatbn•approwdbytMCNy Ergina•r. Notes: JJ- (,) NI puN Nar snap N No. B luwr ah•rwiu ep•cs,ad •Y iM CMy EngiMer. (2) ConduN shah N 3•irlch gaNanii•d M•N wM puarop•. e. yVha•1 dnir rirlpa alga N ilWaNal on al bur otxrwn d Na•ft•clbnt p•r CNy J-J- Standards «r dir•ctal Oy tM CNy ErgN,•u. t. Exafirlg CNy roads rquNNq aorsltnKtlon ahY rNrtain opM b iralnC al aN time wiM -1-~- ad•qual•d.IdwaWMlpwrMntclbn. A•InN dortr•p•mll mayN raquN•d. Acash O•posN anM N Proya•d ro dorm at• cos a ¢adwq era pavNlg, wnph sraa N rohrnaed won oompt•aon a •1• cortslntctbrl b ql• fatlalatlbn a m• Cay ErlgNl••r. g. Conc•neat•ddralrl•p•Ibw•sMlnolaorsWwYU. lM••rsWwakdraMr NhaN N _J_J- irotaMd b Clly Stal,OalOt, •ac•q br aktgM nr1Wy ton. n. Mandbw aowsa ramp •Mlgn atoll N r sp•cNNE by tM CMy EfIgMM«. J_J- i. StnNrwn•sthYb•appw•dMtMCNYPWnwpA«bsubniMalbrlNstp4nch•dt. J_J- s. Suet b9roe•m•nt pans p•r City StarldarW r« al privet. sIr•aa shat N pbv,dsd for J~- rviaw era appovI bY,rN CNY Enpkl••r. Prbr b arty woM Nkq p•Aam•d on ih• pn• yet. w••n, r«a arrlt w pea era aorrstruclbn plnNn eras a aaairl•• nom tlw clry Ertpr,••fs Oab• n aednbrl ro any oM« p•mlNa nquk•e. 8. Str••, tr•••, a mNarnfm a , Syalbn a¢• «lalg•r, thw 0• NMaN•d p•r CNy Standards in J-J- accordarrw wNh tM Ciry's stn•t iM program. QOr365 Y ~ 7 / 91 I O of 17 ,,,,,D242-11 7. IMersegion line al sne tlesgns span M reviewe0 oy the Cny Ergmeer br conbrmance won atlopted polby. _/_~ a. On codeaor or larger streets, lines of sqM sMll M potted for aN project imersectbns. intludirq Wiveways. Wads, spro, and sbpas shall M boated outside the lines of sgM. Landatapinp era dhN Ob3lrUdbns w%Mn iM lines d sqM shad M approvetl by tM CNy Engineer. b. Local residsrnial street iMerseCtbns srwN Mve tMV noticsabildy improved, uaualy by moving iM 2./-cbsest street tresson each side awrylromtMStreetara placed %f a street tree easement. a. A perrr>it shad Oe oaakraO lrom CALTRANS for any wont wNMn IM tolbw%p right-ol~way: 9. All pubNC inprovMMMS on tM bdon%rtg sirsala shall W OPerallortally eempNts poor to iM issuance of building pamale: N. PuDNC aYlMartartp Aran 'iflllt~. _~ 1. A aeparals set d p4M par ErtgMtaenng Ptldk WOM3 Sundarda shah W submNtW t0 tM C iMar Io~rwMw and approval poor b flrW map apgovm or gsuarrce d buildktq pemlNa, whicMver OCWn Taal. TM bAOrnrtp Wdaapa parkwrys, medians, paseos, easertlenn, itib, d OtMf Yana ife nplked 10 be sort%ed NIIO iM Landscape Mairtnnartee DiatrlLY: Ce AAAAU AI I'M "IYIAIL, 2. A sgned consent era waiver form to pin arwortonn iM appro(diele LanMcape and L'pMirg Diatrir,YS sMN IN fiN0 vriM iM CMy ErtgiMer pnorb Ibal map apgovator ieaWrtad building peones whirJtsvY acorn fiM. FormYbn meh ahaN be bona by tlN dwebpar. 3. An raquiredpudk laraacapirg era bngatbn eypema snaN W mrairdrously maintaiMd bytM devebpef unit acwgetl by dts City. 4. Partway laraaeapirq Ort tM blbwrirtp etreet(a) ahaN COrNOrtn b tM resuNa d tM raepegive (3eatnNication Mahar Plan: O. Drainage era Fb00 COrM101 t. Tns pojep (or Dor•.bM IMreol) b boated wNhin a Food MaNW 2oM; IMrNOre, Ibod proteabrt rrlsasurse eAaN ba provided u grlNleO by a rapiatarw ,lull EnglneY and apWoved M fire CNy ErgMer. 2. It shad be 1M tlewbpers naponaNiiMy to have tM t%lrrarN FIRM Iona dssgnalbn rerrbvW Irbrlt tM proieq ans. TM dwelopers artgNwar sled prepare art necessary nPOna, plans, aro hydrologir~hydratNlc ealCUlagorla. A CoMNbnal LsdY of Map gevision (CLOMR) shah ba obtained hom FEMA prior b tktY roaP approval or issuance d Wildkig plrrtnNa, aAtblNVer cacao Ikal. A LMY al Map Revisbn (CONK) shall W issued Dy FEMA prof b otxupanry or +rprdverrMA atxeplana, whichever oocun first. J~r_ JJ_ J~_ J~- J___/_ J~_ JJ- ~_/- JJ- J___/_ 3. A final drainage shdy aMN W sufxniNW b and approved W NN CNy EnglnNr prbr to final '~ .~'-r.- map approval or the iswanp Of OuilOirg pemlNS, wfiiclNVY gcNra lust. All drainage IacdNMS shah be inslalNd ae rarJtiirW by tM CNy EngiMer. oonsss SC • Z/9I 11 of la Z-,~ ., De92-!i o. A pamit from tM County Food Comrol ~istrkt is required for work whin es rgnt-obway J-/- 5. Trees ife prohibited within 5 feel of iM outside diameter o1 arty pudk slonn drain ppe measured Iron fns outer wipe of a mature tree trunk. J~_ 6. Pubae storm drain eatuments ahap a graWd to convey ovemows in iM went a a I JJ_ bbckaps in a wmp catch baser on Me pudk street. P. UtIIttNs t.Provide separate utility ssrvieea to each parcel ekMtdMtQ wtaary lewerape system, water, J~- gas, electric power, tabplane, and abM N (all underground) n aoordartce with IM Utility Standards. Easemerds sMa M provided as required, 2, The dwebber shah W responsipN for tM relocalbn a eskaeg ulaaMa as rteaseary. J-/- 3. Water and sewer pgro lftaa t» aeeipned ors! Wrtfantaed b mast pte nquhrt»raa of IM -1--/- Cucanarpa County Wa1H Ohbkl (CCWD), gartClb l.ttaanbrga FMa Pfaecdon Olgria. and tM EnvirorerwAil HeMh OePartntant a iM County a San Bemrdlm. A Mttu a complitrtce Iron tM CCWD b required prior b teal map appfwal ar 4wartee a pemtiu, whkMvsr Doors IirM. O. Gattaral RaquNUtwrtta affil Apptwasa t . Tha Nparall paraeltaaMieNd waNn dNMaleat tloYftdarfai oboe W IsgaMy lbfflbMted ire0 I J_/_ one parcel prior to iuuarta d buiONq parmss. 2. M easement IOr a lava ufe deveway s11aN (N provbM Drbr b Ietal ma0 apgoval Of Tswana a building puma. whiatsver oacws Mq, ta: J~ 3. Prior b approval a the Itnal map a r7aposs she W postM wile tlN Cey oovNNq tlN I J~- sstimned oust d ttpportbninp IM aawaantara lamer AouuMm Diablo among tM awy aeuw parcels. 4. EthvaftdySan Swains Ma Bayonet MaNMYN, Saoormry gepbrW, anti Mager Plan J~- OrainapaFeMShahWptYdpMrblYfalmspapppvalaprbrbbuadkgpufMbwana M rb mtp n irnaNad. 5. Pemtita snaa W obUktad ltom tM bMowklp apatteMa for wok wllhitt Itwir rlpM~ol-way: ~ ~J_ 6. A sipnw sewn and wWU Ism b lain attNa lOrm pM Law Ertbraman Cortntuftay I J_/- FsdWlp Olstkt shas be Isad wMlt tM CMy Eftpinaer prior to sls~ rhP apPrwal ar tM awana a buaalq pamw, wnkMwr oases Ikp. Fomtallon poab tttsll W tome by tM Oevefopsr, 7 Prior to firuNxtnion a any 0wskfplMnl phw, strllldan intproeantant palls stall ba cam- J~- platad t»yoM tM phase bouttfkufM b auun faoormary aoaa aro tkaMtapa praKtbn b IM salialaClgn Ol da Clry Enynsa. Phate ifourtdarbs shat garraapaftd b bt Frtas Sitbwn on tM appovW tamrlw Ilap. oonss~ SC ~ 1/al Is of 17 ~~- y~-~ 13 v~ C-~-7 --JANUARY 8, 1993 GOVERNORS PROPOSAL --OVER $ 2 BILLION FROM CITIES, COUNTIES AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS --OVER $300 MILLION FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES --ESTIMATED OVER $800,000 LOSS FROM PROPERTY TAX FROM CURRENT $2M --$2.5 MILLION FROM PROPERTY TAX/AUGMENTATION 1. POSTPONE ANIMAL CONTROL 2. POSTPONE GOING OUT TO BZD ON FIRE STATION 3 3. NO NEW ACQUISITIONS FROM HOUSING SET-A-SIDE FUND FOR WHICH NO FINANCIAL COMMITTMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE. 1 5751 Cabrosa Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 July 9, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Mr. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner RE: Building Permit For Barn at 9400 Almond Street The City has requested, as a condition of approval of the application referred to above, that we submit a letter signifying nur willingness to'dedicate land £or trail purposes across the subject property. The undersigned are prepared to dedicate land as a community trail for purposes as specified by the City's Trails Master Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The dedication will be located approximately along the southern and western edges of the property; 2. once dedicated, the City will be responsible for maintenance of the trail; 3. In addition to the City required trail fencing, we will have the right to fence our property adjacent to the trail at our expense; 4. The dedication will occur prior to the issuance of any building permits for ..he house. We trust that this assurance will permit the processing of our application. Sandra P. Davis R ndolph S. Davis ~ '~ 7 i~lYv SENI :Y~~eDt Pass b Recreatia 1-; ~ 2~ ., ~ 9'oooone26~ cl it rALLIN 1 D~RARl11OP /~ YII~C1 ' PAC81MIlETRANSMRTALa~~r .-- Lary T~ ~OFFIC NWT10NrT;OMP~NY ~P~L""a"h ~6P~'' i ~1 W,~Jw FROM ~....._4`'n ~/bt ^ INFORMATION ~ FORWARDED PER REQUEST ^ COMMENT NOTE AND flLE ^ REPLY•MY SIGiNATURE ^ INVESTIGATE 11 NOTE AND REROUTE ^ REPLY-CC ME ^ CONTACT ME M[CQAOEAEMdNN9 dP.N ~ u rP~+ rpa City of Ranctt° OuQCamo - - - - - - larrrinr9 Y~y11 'If VOU DO NOT REGEIYE ALL GF THE PAQEB INDICATED. PLEASE CALL THE SENDER A8 SOON AS POSSIBLE. oi: ueDt Parks 6 Recreat ia. 1-20-83 Eo of r" 81a ;ITV nA~~,A Z Route 66 Pearson Garage and lillinq station, Ranoho Cucemongn National Register allgibility The building is a single story stucco covered structure with red til• roof end a prominent throe-bay eanopy Integrity appears to ba rather high. A QOOr on the north side has bean removed, and ppart of the roof hoe bean replaced with asphalt covering. A skylight has been addsd at the north alwation, and the gasolire pampa removed. These sltsrations de not, howwaz, serioualpp datraat from the overall historic appearance o! the gas atetion. The buildingg appppears to have a strong likelihood o! National Register eligibility. Zt is nn early exempla of Ste type, a geeollne/automobile service station, and one that hsa a long association with hlstorlo Route 66. 11s the rayort points out, this section o! the higyhway was completed in 1926, and the station was oonstructad in 1928-9. The repport also notes that this buildingg i• the best preserved remainingq exemppla o! qes station architecture, that which has retained the highest degree of integrityp The 2ooa1 historic Ppreservation commision hold thnt the building is "one of the oldest and rarest axemples in the antis region o! vernacular roadside arohlteeture." The building map also be significant in the social history of the community, both because of its rol• in sheltering Depression aza travelers, and as a ggnthsrinq place !or citrus ranchers and other local residents. 81griilicanca in this arse would need additional contartual inlormation to establish the relative importance of the station !n thn• two roles. Howwar, there bupldingti• signiticenttlocall~in theohietocats that the 1 y ry o! transportation and architecture. eecausa of the importenas o! the canopy in deilninq the identity o! the structure, it Ss likely that !ts removal would preclude the possibility of listing Sn the National Register, A short move, one that keppt the station close to its original location on Route 66, end in it• onyanal orientation, would ba lase likely to jeopardise allgibility. Ideally however, the building should remain xn its present position. Maryln Bourne Lorti• January 4, 199a •+ To: 1111 Members of City Council We the residents at San Mateo Place, Santa Barbara Place and Santa Clara Court attach our signature hereto in illustration of our opposition to proposed development. The development of the triangular parcel adjacent to our homes ie o! great concern to us. Wa era opposed to the proposed street configuration of San Mateo and Santa Barbara. We era in favor of cul de sacs for both San Mateo and Santa Barbara. We era also in favor of limiting the number of homes added to Santa Clara Court to two. These characteristics of development as we have requsstad them, best serve ovr neighborhood in safety, traftic end consistency. Please take our opinions Into consideration. Thank you. Respectfully, Residents of Rancho Cucamonga ca ~~~ ~~p~ ° o y sa. ~o.. ,mar-an~c i~ TG'I~k-ENGE {~+ I~IRTIS7G ~• h y ~FENiKFF 3Ati5i~ '. TE~~6K~E EA'nsrb ~~ ,. .. , ---,-_ ~-_-~~ ~-_ r ~ ~ - ~-%~ --...-- r ~- f-- BEST, BEST & KRIEGER •rrr~~nrlr il.c~ LAWYf R6 ~Y c~~rr~• FIVE 8610E BOO NO P1N NhVC N. 601iE I]p gbNCHO MIR/iOE I .I rI 606.1.50 n i O))ICE 00.{ • (b l9) 46B~t 611 - ONThRI O, C.I LIFORNIL691]fl PALM SPflIN03 iC LEPHONE ()1/1 989050. X6191 3)50)6. 1E LECOPIEP (>1.) 9..1.11 January 12, 1993 C17YOF H~`.x' ~ i HARD DELIVERY AOW1N ^7LI ~.:CFMO;,, ' ' IIpN Ms. Debra J. Adams JAN 12 1993 City cieRancho Cucamonga ~'8'9'~C~I~.Ie,;.e,d,4•,,~, 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91725• Re: Smith's Food 6 Druq Centers, Inc. Dear Ms. Adams: in accordance with our telephone conversation, ve have enclosed eight sets of informational materials about Smith's Food & Drug centers, Inc. fiach sat contains the following materials: 1. The 1991 Annual Report. "t. The 1992 First Quarter Report. 3. The 1992 Second Quarter Report. 4. The 1992 Third Quarter Report. 5. A brochure entitlefl "Alliance for Innovation" that contains general information regarding the operation of the supermarkets. 6. A video tape entitled "A Better Way Ta Run A Supermarket" that also contains general information regarding the operation of the supermarkets. We request that you promptly distribute one set each to the Mayor, each councilmember, the City Manager and the Planning Director, :+nd that one set be retained in your office. If you have any questions please call us. Very ly o s, er M. Barmack, Esq. for BEST, BEST 6 KRIEGER PMB/jr VK23/d7 REGEIVEU CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGa ADMINIS?RA?ION 1,F;a•ren ro Hr.,nBeHsnl.r .ut Hnucno cucnwoucn I:R: sHt'ru's JAN 191993 7,8,9.10,7 i,lG,i,Z,o,4,5,c Dear Member: over a year vyv thA Stnte Vui,l d.l.nq 'I'r:ndes council, ab.i ch represents al.l of us began nngqvP..l ntlvnn wl. I:h Sm.l l:h's Fovct and Utttq about build l.ng lhn1C stores with Uul.on labor, paying fn .l r. wagges to out local tew.ldents. Sml fir's l.n a lotye grorv ty retail cotpotatlon based in Utnlr, whlclt plane tc buJ.Ld 7/n of n billion dollata of stores and unrehoUSeB in Ca 1.l Coth.ln. The diaCl1a31011 alth 6m1 t11's went on [ot one gear wlkh peoponals dud counter proporals. 1'hopa dlecassiona did not end with mr agreement f.or. sml.th's to build Uuiop. flow we ate eugagerl Lr a cr.ucl vl. ak ruggle which will determine whether large out of. sta Le concerns cnn coma to caAifvtnle and totally dl,sregatd the standards which wa have spent years fighting fol. He al, rnrq wJ.th the rest of I:Iw Dui ld l.nq 'trades affiliated crafts have bean Sevf.l eC.i.nq Sml.lar's seven days a week telling the general public of the ser,lous healLlt vlolntl.vne which Sm~t6'a teas amassed. Their disregard not oniYq effer_ts Us but also effevts the ehtite community that we aJ.,l. ).lve i.n. t am arl l•1 uq you nt lhln time to nsk fvk sl+ecial assislonce which yoU me irr a un .yue howl. klon t-o give at this time. smith's Ss pl.nnn lerg to moves inl:o Honcho coca monggs and lulends dlstegstd the desl.gn tequlr.ements which the cl.t-y has placed for all now bual.ness. Pre Jntend to he nt the Cltyy Cor.nrc.ll, when this 1.aalte cornea be[ote them and let them know thnt cl.ti.>ens of, Itvnchv cucamonya are in opposition Co gqlvih~ Rmith's spec.lal treatment. Xou will get a pholte ca l.i a sla nq wIP_ttlPt we can count on your patticl potion. I hope you will step forward and help us Lr Chia crucial fight. Please see attached 31st and contact all of the names listed at Rancho Cucamongo CSty Hall. protesting the new Smith Pood b Drug located at Vineyard 6 Foothi l'1 in Rancho Cucamonga. 1+1ltlle'~do 'hot ^entlvn Eha'IY~ you are a Vnion member./ - Fr~a~te~r/nally yours, ~. + Bob Ilatmon Business Agent Ironwotketa Local A33 . .~ RANCHO CUCANONGA CITY NALL P.O. 80X 007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CA 91729-0007 MAYOR DENNIS L. STOUT MAYOR PRO-TEM CHARLES J. EUQUST COUNCILMAN WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER COUNCILMAN REX GUTIERRHZ COUNCILWOMAN DIANE WILLIAM3 ~.~ 1b ~'~w,~ a9°a aJ !' ~~ ?~,oC atia 0atib v e ..i~:a ?a~ m ?oa F~o~ b~ ~°a~ ~~ ~4~ O 6 yea a ti° o~ ta' v° ob ~e oae yo Qp4 Qtio Soy 3~ a°,®ea1 goo oQe Leo t~ef . ~° ~e .~° ~ Q a~` o~ Jc a~ t Oq ~~ ~'~ LOCAL UNION NO. 108 G1'„l~. ~ Sheet Metal Workers' Intemabonal Association , ss~`• January 8, 1993 Dear Sir and Brother. Over a yeaz ago, the Stale Building Trades CouncU, which represents all of us, began negotiations with Smith's Food and Drug. Our request was that Smith's budd their stores with Union labor and pay fair wages to our local residents. Smith's is a large grocery retail corporation based m Utah. They plan to bu11d stores and warehouses m Calforna which would cost approximately 3/4 of a billion dollars. The State Building Trades dtscusstons with Smith's went on for one year with marry proposals and rnunter proposals. Those discussions did not end with an agreement for Smith's to bu0d with Union Iabor. Now we aze engaged In a crudal struggle to determine wheUrer lazge out of state corporations can come to California and totally disregard the standards which we have spent years Oghting to achieve. We, along with the rest of the Building Trades atIlllated crafts, have been hand bfufng Smith's scum days a week. Our goal is to tell the general public of our dilemma and the serious health Wolatloas which Smith's has amassed. Their disregard not only affects us but also affects the entire community that we live m. At this t1me, your communfy is in a unique position to give our crusade spedai assistance. Smith's is planning to move into Rancho Cucamonga and mtmds to disregard the design requirements which the dty has placed for all new business. We must ask the dty to retrain from giving Smith's any spetlal compensatlon or variantt from the standard building requirements to circumvent bWldmg their store to the current city bullding codes. We Intend to be at the City CouneU meetings when this Issue comes before them and let them know that citizens of Rancho Cucamonga are 1n opposltlon to glvmg Smith's any spedal treatment. You wW receive a telephone call asking whether we can count on your support and participation. 1 hope you wW step fororud and hdp us ta this crucial fight. We ask that you advise your friends, neighbors and families not to patronize Smith's Food and Drug centers. Additionally, we need volunteers to help hand hW and phone bank ta our crusade against Smith's. if you have any free tune, please call me at the o[Bce and I wW be happy to provide you with something to do for this campaign. F7atemally yours, Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union 108 .~~~~~ Brad J. Rooker, &IRUnb Business Representative & Coordinator for opdu xao Southern California Smith's Food Campaign aa~do•cic, ~G~ 5 Lucas Avenue • Lon Angeles, CWiforma ~A)U l' • i?111 ~t31~?050 • E4.~ 1?t11 ~rHi~]U'6 ~_ JUSTIN F. FARMER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS ING ?33 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 155 FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92635 TEL,li14) 447-6070 FAY (714) 447-6080 January 11, 1993 Prescott Muir Architects 159 W. Pierpoint Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 RE TRUCK ACCESS, SMITHS CENTER VINEYARD AND FOOTHILL RANCHO CUCARONGA, CALIP. OUR FILE / F1002 Gentlemen, At your request, we have reviewed the latest site plan for the subject Location, particularly regarding the ability of trucks to enter, load/unload, and depart without impacting either vehicular or pedestrian traffic. For purposes of analysis, we have used the undated site plan prepared by Tait and Associates. That plan indicates a possible use of the property on the southwest corner of Vineyard and San Bernardino for commercial purposes with the parcel labeled "NOT A PART, FOR MASTER PLAN USE ONLY". The following is a summary of our analyses regarding the ability of trucks to enter and exit the site, via Foothill; Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue driveways and their ability to circulate within the site. For purposes of analyses, we have used a "semi" as a design vehicle with a 5o foot turning radius. Each critical location associated with the site is addressed separately. ENTERING THE SITE VIA VINEYARD AVENUE A delivery truck requiring a 50 foot turning radius can quite easily make a northbound left turn into the proposed 40 Foot wide driveway. However, a similar vehicle turning right into the site from southbound Vineyard Avenue cannot execute a right-turn from the proposed right turn lane under conditions as shown. If the curb return on the northwest corner of this driveway were to be constructed to a 35 foot radius, a southbound truck could enter the site without undue intrusion into the through south- bound lane, nor would that truck unduly interfere with traffic exiting the site driveway. VIA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD one driveway is proposed onto Foothill Boulevard, that being near the western side of the parcel. A 35 foot wide throat and 18 foot radii are proposed. Like Vineyard Avenue, a separate right turn lane is also proposed to expedite traffic entering the site without impeding through traffic on westbound Foothill Boulevard. If a truck with a 50 £oot turning radius attempts a right-turn into the driveway, and if that turn is started with the trucK within the outside through lane (not in the right turn lane), the truck will require 20 feet of pavement and thus will impede outbound traffic exiting the driveway if the driveway throat is only 35 feet wide. If, on the other hand, the driveway was widened to 40 feet and striped such that the entering truck has 20 feet of driveway throat to turn into, then turns can be executed with a minimum disruption to non-truck traffic. Inasmuch as a raised median island is proposed for Foothill Aoulevard, left-turns into the site will be precluded. EXITING TRAFPIC VIA VINEYARD AVENUE Exiting this driveway via either a left or. right turn can be accomplish within the designed driveway. It will be noted that an exit via a right turn will necessitate the front left of the truck to intrude into, or nearly into, the ~1 southbound (inside) through lane. Disruption to through traffic should be minimal, albeit the truck will use much of the southbound travel way to complete an exiting maneuver, because the right turn will be made into a gap in southbound traffic created by a traffic signal at San Bernardino Road/Vineyard Avenue. Exiting this driveway via a left-turn should be relatively easy in that there will be ample gaps in northbound traffic (created by the signal at Foothill/Vineyard) and the turning radius for a left-turn is much greater than for a right-turn. VIA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Inasmuch as Foothill Boulevard is expected to have a raised median island, all turns out of the driveway will be confined to right-turns. Assuming the left edge of an exiting truck is located at the center of a ]5 foot wide driveway, that left edge of an exiting truck will intrude approximately 20-25 feet into westbound travel lanes on Foothill Boulevard. Because of the close proximity of a traffic signal "up stream" of this driveway, it is anticipated that ample gaps in traffic flow will exist to accommodate an occasionalexitinq truck. JGSTIN E FARMER 2 rw~~nroHrano~ i,~oi~et:x~. i~r. INTERNAL TRUCK CIRCULATION WESTERN LOADING DOCXS Provisions have been made for two trucks to unload Simultaneously as well as a truck in front of the compactor. While a driver will have no difficulty arriving from either Foothill, Vineyard, and backing into either of the unloading stalls (docks), that same driver may experience some difficulty in leaving the dock and turning "half left" due to a small landscaped parking lot island located almost due south of these docks. It will be noted that a truck cannot leave southbound via the aisle parallel to and adjacent to the creek, because of the location of the only site driveway onto Foothill Boulevard. It is recommended that the three landscape islands located south of the western loading docks be reduced in size and configur- ation, as shown on the attached drawing. Described verX briefly, the westernmost parking lot island should be reduced in size to accommodate one new parking stall; the middle island should be revised to eliminate one parking space and convert the area to landscaping. The easternmost of these 3 islands should be narrowed slightly to accommodate the wide truck path. If the above modifications are made, the number of parking stalls will not be changed nor will there be any noticeable change in aisle alignment. Trucks will be able to arrive Prom all cardinal directions and will be able to leave to the west via Foothill Boulevard and to the north, east and south via vineyard Avenue. An alternate design was considered wherein handicap parking stalls were relocated such that truck docks were aligned in a north-south direction. While this would tend to improve truck circulation, it would place Handicap parking stalls such that travel paths would cross the dock approach, which would not be recommended. EASTERN LOADING DOCK Trucks can approach this dock from either Foothill Boulevard via the main North-South aisle, then easterly along the Pront of the store. A truck can also enter from Vineyard Avenue and turn into the easternmost North-South aisle. From either location the driver then can back into the dock. A minimal modification to the landscaped island immediately south of the dock will be required. A driver leaving the easternmost dock can make aright-turn and leave westbound along the store frontage. This will require a minor modification to the landscaped islands as shown on the attached sketch. once oriented in a westbound direction, the driver can leave the site via Foothill Boulevard westbound. JUSTIN E FARMER rNn~~POkrnnov r:w.ner:ks. ruc Although there are minor changes that will expedite truck circ- ulation on-site, the project appears to be well designed and truck activity will not pose a problem for customers. Respectfully submitted, J-`U7S~Ty/INI(F~. PARMER, TRANSPORTd.TION ENGINEERS, INC. /-(~ ~/~/ Justin F. Farmer P.E. President JFF:dk cc: Mr. Fred Urbanek Mr. Mark Babbitt JUSTIN E FARMER 5 TRA.\SFORtAT10V ENGL\EERS, INC INTERNAL TRDCX CIRCULATION 1. Access to the westernmost loading docks will be satisfactory from any of the cardinal directions. 2. Minor modifications will be necessary to the landscaped islands in the parking lot south of this western loading dock such that trucks can exit that dock. Those modifications are illustrated on the attached drawing 3. Minor modifications will be necessary to landscaped islands south of the eastern loading dock so that a truck may enter and leave this rather long slender dock. 4. while not absolutely mandatory, it is suggested that the 5 foot wide landscaped space adjacent to and east of the eastern dock be shortened approximately 20 Peet. This will make entering or leaving this dock much easier. 5. Inasmuch as the vast majority of truck activity takes place in the very early morning periods, there should be no appreciable conflict between trucks and customers. P(YfENTIAL MASTER PLAN The site plan indicates a MASTER PLAN SCENARIO for that parcel of land along the south side of San Bernardino Road west of Vineyard Avenue. For master plan purposes a parking lot and driveway are illustrated. Truck turning templates have been placed on this driveway and it is recommended that a MINIMUM driveway "throat" width of 35 feet will be required for a truck to ENTER a driveway to this lot. It should be emphasized that the current proposal does not envision any development on this site. The analysis herein is solely to set minimum conditions IF AND WREN this parcel is developed (at some future time). In the above, it was stated that a wider driveway will be needed for a truck to turn oUT OF A DRIVEWAY at a location associated with the subject Potential Master Plan. Due to the existing (40 feet) street width on Ban Bernardino Road at this location, a throat width of approximately 50 feet will be needed unless a customized driveway approach design is used. This parcel is not a part of the project and thus a driveway is not currently under consideration. AChT1.V F. FARMER 4 TRANSPORTA170N ENGINEER5, INC January Z0, 1993 T0: RanChO CUCarnOnQa City COUnCi1p8f50nS FROM: Ed Combs, Property Owner -8008 vineyard Ave., Rancho Cucamonga I'm the property owner at the Southwest Corner of Vineyard and San Bernardino Roads. In 1991 Smith's Food IOng opened escrow and was purchasing my property to dose escrow on 9/1/92. Not until mid 1882 did I realize that Smith's was not including my parcel along with the two parcels directly to the west of mine in their plans for the entire block. When the Foothill Specific Plan was being developed it became very clear to me that a single developer for the entire bock from Foothill to San Bemardino along the wash to Vineyard was best be suited for the properties. Smith's came along and 'tied" up every parcel in the bbdc. tt seemed to be an excellent situation for the city, the property owners and Smith's. In mid 1992 we were told by Smith's they weren't going to dose escrow on my property and the two apartment complexes because the dtY had 'cut down' their development size. Smith's went ahead and submitted the stte plan without including our properties. We were never told, in advance, what Smith's plans were nor did we ever see the proposed site plan until just before the planning commission meeting. (Note: My parcel had en approved plan with buikling approval, permit fees paid and ready for construdion...when Smith's came along. I felt tt would be best for the entre parcel rf I did not proceed with my plan. Now that Smith's had changed their minds my plans have expired and now I'm Jett with no approved plans.) The current site plan before you tonight indicates a development of about 500,000 sq.ft. land inducting all parcels in the entire block with the exception of three parcels at the extreme Northam part of the development. These three parcels total about 38,000 Sq.Tt. I do not feel the plan as submitted by Smith's meets the guidelines of the Foothill Plan nor does tt albw for smooth traffic or pedestrian flow through all parcels in the bock, and would not be compatible with future developments on the small three remaining parcels in the block. 1 request that you deny the site plan as submitted by Smith's and uphold the Planning Commission decision to deny the project. In late limber 1992 Smith's asked all three property owners 'rf we would sell to Smith's. We answered in the afirmitive. If you have any questions I'll be attendance at the meeting. Than you, ~~ Ed Combs, Property Owner -8008 Vineyard Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. ;: ~~~ arvc~~""10~ JAN 191993 ~,~efien~1z, sc ~? s,-o~„ ~ ~9yc~. /-r B-ys !mss „v ~f'oyG Ti.y..L (ij.~.^s,o.N.-vT o ,c' //rris ~,~PE„~ .G' ~/~~ vE G!/iY~l'FSS.e`~. 7"i'i!,~ G.st~unsrr ~x~.v3 4.v dF' 7^'NS ,..-9.arc.9 ~,~vrc _ .,? 2.~jsu~~°~~ 4 r vyzY,~yp-fy~E; ?y . , ~~i9jYHi,~/ G C-pw"/~'.9/A.y ~ G-i7'y C. ctJ.Vt,.C. Win? 7~is. C.',S;9i,tr 's?oat~' m~.Fsr,97'.ta~v' i9.L3m,rra- ,7''0 ..J.rv~°- iy i.~rs ~.a~ ~r/,ii.c-a.E- /,?.F,~y s.~..cz. or~.,~.~~is ~- ;r~~,vr~-~s h'~>/.~ ~'.los~1~ sii~ Dy.9~~'4s rae,~ ~ ~~ .i' oy .rmryE~~~ GG'irr~ 7-°n'is .y ,~+"r..di,0 .~ , s.e~li~`1i,~ %/~'is c--d..~Y~,.,sv~y ~,-ovro ,L~.c 6)~•~/U,~?~ r .-~.rcn- ~~" G°o,~DtYp,S~S S'.r-y ~Ary ~ rs+..i,/ lJi eq..aCE- ?o vd •~iy, ~'~ 1~~°%yrv~-rs S,f'avao .~~ ~.~r~'.~ /~ CITY pFq~CHOCD `~~/7 ~.uy ~~s. AOMIp7rSTRq °DA / ,er ~y JAN 19 1993 f •-r" 1~ 4~~~' ~ , T8~8,iU,7r,72,7,e",3,g68 ' ~i,n ~ ~~. w jF: e, ~, .,, .. # { _._, .>, (r /n ~~ / //u t ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 rionorable Mayor Stout: /4, 1^ '..~ ~~/~, ..~ I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and i enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification oP this City. i recently became aware that Smith's Food & Drug is planning to build new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. Z would like to go on record in opposition to •.he City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food 6 Druq Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Dray Stores offer a concept that sounds grent, "one Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the most part reside and work here ir. Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics and othsr large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meat you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food 6 Drug issue le on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely yours, RECF.IVEu CIiY OF RANCHO 0.iCAMCN6~ ADM IN'•STZ n' m': January 15, 1993 N.ayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rarchc C+±camen?~, rp 91729-090? Honorable Mayor Stout: JAN 191993 7,8,9,10a ; .e.;.~ o ~ ,. I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food & Druq is planning to build new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place Por the construction of new business. i wcu13 like to qo on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food & Drvg Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "one Stop Shopping' but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the moat part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out oP the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong as the small buslneas of the area. IP Smith's is allowed to build i['s store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food & Drug issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely your , Sanuary 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Sox 807 Rancho C~_camonga, CA °.1729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: RECEIVED CIiY 0A0MNN'SrRa py OnG~ JAN 191993 i currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. i recently became aware that Smith's Food & Drvg is planning to builfl a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place Lor the construction of new business. I would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food & Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Drug stores offer a concept that sounds great, "One Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business aen and women, for the most part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics anfl other large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many oP the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to gat the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food d Drug issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! 9lncerely our , t k 0 N a _ ^" {!~, P O ~y ~ U U N ((f~ .-1 XX L M i O ~~ 0 U O V „ V o0 O • U ~~A~ ~ n ~~~ ~~~ qq~ g i~~ RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONG+~ ADMIN~c7RAPAN JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'/29-0807 Monorable Mayor Stout: ~~8,9,iQt~ J2:"~,4s,u.a.c I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food & Drug is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. i also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. i would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food 6 Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food b Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "One Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the moat part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. we are see ing more and xore families moving out oP the Rancho Cucamonga area because oP the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. if Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. i sincerely hops to get the opportunity to meat you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food & Drug issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely yours, ~~ti~~~ ~' . ~; ~- ti ~~ ~~ ,,~ . nn~ V` O ~~\ ~~ ~, ~ _~~ ~~~ a r y0 0 F 6 O x U m U x ~ a W U %..U a O O m O a x x O U U ~~o~ a N i 6 • V O a z z m H •„~ ~ E < O F U F V RECEIVEL CITY OF flANCHO CUCAMONf 40MiN I$igA710"~ JAN 19 1993 January 15, 1993 7,8,910.7 , e ', ,_ .. ..., Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food & Drug is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. I would like to go on reoord in oppcsition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food S Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "one Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the most part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out of iha Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food 6 Druq issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! sincerely yours, ~~~~~~~ ~''~~~'g -~l~Yauo ave. RPT~4~T?aucFw cucwmo~A. a a a~a N '1~ N o' ~ V ~ F V i ~! - f 6 V6 ~ .1 xUxT. Z ~ V ~ ~ t b. U 'Ji Ut.._' a m1O QS ~ d ~~~~ ~ ~ M 'Z ~y 2I~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 3 IZ QU ~~M 'y'am ~~ ~ ~r .'3nud rv -.. 190' RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON''. ADM!NISTHATION JAN 191993 Mav: x- i:r_nnls '~. Ctout pa r. ~.ho C'., c.amo nga Citti Hall ..,. ~.,,. ~~~n7 7,8,9,10:11,12,1,'2,3.4... %a~r•~~>h~.~..~lcanwnca. CA 917%~-030' ''^lon'~~'able MavGr °tout: ':uTentlY ree lde hP_Ye In Ra nChO f1U Camonhr: and !nV faml:y and . v"~, i0: thG effnr f.=. cf a malty Cou,^,rll tha': t3kB5 great pr1dE' in the .-:anc: n~. ar.d beau ti.f ication cfi this C1 ty. . recentl~; became aware that Smith's Food 5 Urug 1s pla~nni ny ., •. build a new Gore at foothill and Vlnevarb here In Rancho c.uca:nonga. i Also became aware that Smith 's is tryl ng to disregard sny dellyn requ3 remenis Chat the Cibl has 1n place for Lhe co~siru otlo^ of new business. i would 11 ke to go on record in cpposl tion to the City Council rnr,nU9r _~ making any COnCP.55 iOn5 to the $mi th'=. FoOtl & Drug Corp. 7ht=~ maY sound a little harsh. But the real sty i= that It may r,ot `.; rn: C'n Fu>d 6 Drtrg Stpree offer a n,ncept that sounds great, 'Une ;top Shoppl nq" bn t, the tact Is Lhat this large corporation ha~~ .:Y.tle Or" *nGW np nCErn for the •=,mall businesses lrl our c6mflUnl ty. ?na ;e s,malt bus.i nes=., men and women. for the most part reside and w~+r;, hrn'-= it Ra nc iio Cucamonga. :dn dre seeing more and snore families moving :>ut cf the Ranc.:-,o :.uca aor,ga ::rea because of the clos'u r=. of Ge Herat bynam3c~ and other large v~,dus t, r,~, ~ f,ommuni Ly ._ only as strong ..~ tr:e ~ma 11 b'u';a nes~; .. l'.he area. if 'iml Lh '0 15 Aloud to bUl ld lt'°. SLO'"e in.3nY Gf the mP..rl;.hant ^. (Pie =.u i'r,~u ndl na rarea w:l'. be forced to c:owe. Cu.':'enC1Y mariV c4 .•hn -. t.:: res .i r'r^, ea"ant, that are lnra r,ed in the V1 na Yard LOtIrL '. h•+rrlr.:; ,a't'a 1':". `. En'a of thr> purpo=_.eC new cite. ~. ,~ ,,. -~ G'. ~~ ~ mef th9 Cl>POr',`.Unt b/ tp mP.Ot ynU G1t Y.hB ~~, ~ mnr t.~ , 41hP, I'? the °~ml th _, FG)gd E Druq .~Elle 1'~ On the :: :n'v ,. ;:: ,:q~:.in,:." for' •/o'.ir c.nnce r,;l ^u near/e]',~ . 90uo~ !-/VAi7CN 0~/Y~ },~OJ (~ ti 0 0 ~ N _a ti Y ~ ~ O .+ r, N U N m a 4 M M O C C S, O O ae~-e E moa U m U ya 7 -+U %U O W O CI C L t t 0 U U C C p C o a m 5 C W C n ~`~ h~~~ ~~~ ;~4 ~ ReCEIVf.D CITY Dh RANCNO CUCAMDNii: ADMIN!SiRAT:ON JAN 191993 Sanuary 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stovt: I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food 6 Drug is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. i also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the city hae in place for the construction of new business. I would tike to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food 6 Druq Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Fool & Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "One Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation hae little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the most part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more famil iea moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga arse because of the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong ae the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores ere ~acent that are located in the Vineyard Court mopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meet you at the city Council meeting where the Smith's Food b Drug issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely yyours, // / ~/?~ ~v"~-' 1 ~ ,ill Y ~--~" r, ~is w ~~~~ u O m O a P a N x N F N m b F 6 o .+ v F U N a i • c+ o a z z 0 0 ~as~ Z V aD W C: K U P O O V ~ U ~~°~ w ~~ ia~~ Ja r.c,r ~,' 7. 1`~J9i Y:an': !1: r,'JC3m0`19aJCitY Ha11 ',i1. So'. 90i I'a rn:~» Cucamonga. Ca ~17~q 0.90' ~b;.n^~.'ab7e Mayr, r' Ctcu t: RECEIVED CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 191993 7,8,9,10;11.12,11 ~.4.5.r. i CUr rend`! r=_alde here :n Pant, !1C Q1Camgn4a antl my f3m11V 3ntl 1 •~~. ,._, the eff o^t.=. Or a Ci t'; Cou ncll that takes yr ea t. pride in the ~;nnn_na and beau Y.if irarior. of this Gi tv. r ecenti~; bec3ma aware that Smith 5 Focd & Crrug i£, planni np _. o:.r. 1:9 ~ new store a.. Foothill and Vine`/ard hire in Rancho l.UC3mpnga., i F11SO became aware that 3mi th's l5 trying tc disregard any de'a 1?n requirements Chat the C1ty ha= In place for the C.in _;[I"UJt.iun Of n9W bu=,i ne55. T wc~!ld Lke `.n go on record in oppo=iLlen to the C1tY fou ncil membef'_. 'aaki np any c.onoes,ions tc the Smith's Food h Uruc Corp. i his isay sound 3 little harsh. 5ut Lhe reap ty is that it may not be h3f Gh P. I'10Uyhl ami t"' G FOOC $ CrU`9 StOYee offer d Cgn~2pt ih3t SOUndi gro3C, ';ne Stnp 54!`,opp3 na" but ths. fact is that t.hi° large corporsti on ha=_. ..~, .^le> ~.- t.nnw concern tart' the wall bus. nesses in our community. nt?se °mal! Gusr eess men and women, far the most. part !-aside end ,, .r'r. _ ~ ,,. Rancho Cucamonga. wz ~`e 3eei n~3 yore ar.d more fiamll les movinc out n! the Rancho C:ucamnn`;IS v~-ea beoause ofi the Olosure o' beneral Dynamics and other l..irge Indira try. U r~.omrnu nl b/ ... oN.v as :ar oh9 as the small burl ne';.=. r,f the area. It 7mith': ,~ aloud to bulid lt'r :. to%e many ,f r,he mer-c.hants in Yhn ?,'.; r'. ou ndl ng area wil] h2 forcetl t.0 of ose. CuI'r en Llv man'/ Of t'~, r.. -, r.ore~ ar5 vac3r. t, that are Inca red ui t!`,e Vineyard G;urt ,~ ,,. '~Lt^ el"eY ]U`.t E3LT pf I, IIe pll !"nOSBd ^,eW Sli.e. 1 ~.tr.o:gr nl h~;r5 ho yPt 7.,he cppnr-tuni k'/ t0 meet YOU at tha_ ~;U!` , n,. Ptl',I wh+31'C', the Sm1 CY: C. ~JOd i [: r'~'tl SSSUB 1,. On the "d,r. r h.'ll'. r. In ^rlvdnfe t.;r YC'~.!Y pbnGern~. Ei ricer ely, /~/n/ - :~; ' ~~ - ~. h O O .-~ a -1 c~ s r r. m ~ ++ G +~ U V ~ ~ H EO Ep G G K ;~, o O A 6 n @ S of o of J W U ~ 7 7 -IU ~U L 0 C 0 tlI C N L G 0 U G G G O K Om a1 saaa ,J ~ ~~ q ~~M ti~ ~0~~ ~~ ~~ RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMONC~~ ADMAN iSTRATION JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: 7,S,g,io,~ ~ ,T2,i,2s,a:5 F I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Counoil that takes great pride in the planning and beautification oP this city. I recently became aware. that Smith's Food 6 Drug is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. ~ would like to go on record in opposition to the City council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food & Druq Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! smith's Food & Druq Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "One Stop Shopping" but the Pact is that this large corporation has little or no conc,rn for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, foz the moat part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong ae the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchenta in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyar3 Ccurt Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to gat the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food 6 Drug issue is on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concarnl sincerely yours, RECEIVED CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOr• ADMINISTQ.ATION JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hail P.O. BoX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: 7,8,9,t0,t ~.~z., z:,.v t.: I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food & Drug is planning to build new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. I would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food 6 Druq Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality ie that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food 6 Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "one Stop Shopping" but the fact ie that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the moat part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. F7e are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure oP General Dynamite and other large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will ba forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food & Drug issue le on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely yours, ~~~~~~~ January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennls L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga city Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: RECEIVED CITY 04DMNM~7aA Cjg4 ONGF JAN 191993 2,8,9,10 ,I.i 1,t.2,o.A P t I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and Z enioy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. T recently became aware that Smith's Food S Druq is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that Smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. I would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food & Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "one Stop shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business men and women, for the most part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. We are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area becauve of the closure of General Dlmamlcs and ethsr large industry. A community is only as strong as the small business of the area. If Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to gat the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food & Druq issue ie on the agenda. Thank you in advance for your concern! sincerely youzs, ~ ~._. r ~~ '.x: ~:. iia i~}~ a: C:i ~.... ^`,. ,\ lY. Y M Lr~_ ~~:. ~Qm m;LL ~U¢ pp WWy~U ZG~ 6 ~ ~~J 4 n ro 0 a a, .~ _6 n t„ ~ N ~ ~ O V f U y ~ < ~ Z y N ~ xxO s=~_m U ~ U O V y, ~ ~ O O U V ~~a~ J CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aDMiNiSrgATION JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: '.8,5.10.u .12,1,2,3,4;5,6 I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga, and my family and I enjoy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautification of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food 6 Druq is planning to build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucamonga. I also became aware that smith's is trying to disregard any design requirements that the City has in place for the constntction of new business. I would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members making any concessions to the Smith's Food & Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh, but the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food & Druq Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "One Stop Shopping" but the fact is that this large corporation has little or no concern for the small businesses in our community. Thane small business men and women, for the moat part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. we are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure oP General Dynamics and other large industry. A community is only as strong ae the small business of the area. Zf Smith's is allowed to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant that are located in the Vineyard Court Shopping area just East of the proposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the opportunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the 9mith's Food & Dzug issue is on the agende. Thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely yours, ~RL-G rn/~N Jarua._! 7. tan ~. .,+_Y~~( ..enr,L ~_. StoUt ~'am:~o C~.lcamcnga City Ha 11 _. .... eon ~.in[I~~.: .~camcnga, t: Ll ?i729 °OBG? l+Gn,p. able ma VO! COll t. RECEIVED CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 141993 7,8,9.10,11,12,1,2$.a,5,a . .... r=ntly r.aslde here Ln Raroho b_camcnga and my fam:lv and i r~.n acv thz sf'ur is cf a^,: ty Ucu ncil taa:. takes great pride 1n the ... n: ma and beaus if loatlor. o' this City. 'er..ent:'. became aware tha i. Sm1 th's • Food R Drug i s p:armin9 ro bu i td ._ ^ew sr•ore at Foo tnill and VLnevsrd Here in Rancho '.. ur amnnga. P.1 sc became aware that Smith 's is trying Lo dl sregard anv _e ~: qn requirements that the City Has in place for the c'.+nstruot.icn o°r new bull Hess. I WC"ald 11<9 t0 ~G Gn reCGYd lrl CppGa tion tU Che ra C`/ f.GU nCll members maki n; any concessions to the Sm: tlr'g Food & Uru3 Corp. !I'+i i'. .Ta`/ eOU nd 5 lltt ie harsh. But the reality 15 that it maY nOt be ha(5`. P.nOUghl (:m1 tC'.''-. FG9d h Dr'Ug C',tGreS 7ffer 3 concept, that sounds-, ~3re3t, 'iJne'S,oo ;hoppl ny" but Lhe facC t=. that this lards oorpora t: or. has ,. t.t;-; ;r ':new concern for the 'small bull ne:sas Ln our' cc.mmuni ty. T he•.e small toss ne=.°. men and women. for the most part resid=. and :r..: -~_~.. Nanr.hc i:ucamonaa. We .aro ~ee.'•,; more and more families moving ..^.ut :f `,he P.anono Gu~amcmga ar ~a bey: au•ae cf the r..l o.=.ure of Gent=.ral Dynarrlce. and Gther larder indu•~.tr ~/. n Canmuni tV •-. on lv a•~ strong .as the small hl; L.: nes". ct the arGa_ :f 7m1 th S. 1.3 aloud tC bUiid t'b Store many cf the m9rGhan t lr tl'~e :,u rrc.:ntli~,-ra area will be For Ged t.c close. Currently many of t'nz •.Cnr ens :v'e ~:acant, that are located in the 'Jineyard ::ourC Ctinrpl n~; ar ca ]u"'_ Ft.=.t o`, tha purposed new s1te. ' :..+, •'e1 / hJrD 4. tG 7et t.h^ pPPGI"tUnitY t0 mP.et `/CU 3t the +:,. ~.~inr :. me evt+n;+ w!-e. p' the Sm1 nh ~ Food 8 Di ug issue Ls on the c m:d '..•.v !nu .n .: d~'anca for tiour concern! 5l ncere tv, ~4Yfi ^1 Q) ~ ~ M 4i ~ 'J ~ 3 ~ ~ Q.. ~ V Q \ ~ ~ U_ ~ ~ n._ ~ CL. 1 0 ~~ N ~ t~ x N a a Y <, O ~+ U i~ ~ m L p0 pp O G C >. G O W E~-E S t0 0 ~ U ~ U N J -~ U ;C U A o l0 O pl p 4. L t 0 U p G C C G O W of xawa DECEIVED CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGP ADMINIG?RATION Ja roar', 1°9' JAN 141993 7,8,9,10,1 t.12.t,2.3.4,5,t M, r: ur ,'a nr :':; '~. stout k3'i0'3°: GJ <a.Y'O ngd C1 tY' Nall R .:~. ..,4 Fiv~ f:,3n! -i .: C.3mcnua. 1. (~, '~1 ~i ~'''~~Di "~9 r0:'abiE Md`:o^ .aCUt: L :V r:'ent 1Y re51dE here in r'3nOh0 CU03inO:nga and ml'f.3Ri11`J and ':- t`~C 9.'f0' `e n~ d C1 t': COIInCAl ti`la: i..3 /.CF. g'"P.dL Frl:[ 1n the inrnli" Jnrl beau ttf tca lion of _:,.., ,..,.. re ;entiv becdmE aware t.hiaL ^P1 t.h's Food ` 5 C!rug is Fiannln9 t l,i a _ , ::u rnw _t.ore at r oo thi 11 anC Vlneva rd here In Rancho ur.arc',on~-]d. ' /also became 3Wdr0 that smah"E. l~: tYy l n<.J LO tlleregdr'd !r'/ :B?1rJn 'eQU SremEn25 LhdL the , Clty has In F1aCe fOr Ch9 ....,.:,:-.,. ... on . ~ new bueine=.e.. i Wocld 11 Y.e to go on record in oppos: tlon to Che City Cr. ~.:ncll ,iemt.+ers maV.i na anv .^.o ncess lone tc the Smith'°. Focd R Drug CorF. 7C1~~ ^::v sound a li ttla harsh. But the reality i~ that It m,': not ,.c harsh enough' ;;n,l hh 'a F.;cd & Cru'~.^, t<:re~ offer a : :cncept that eountls ar'eaL. '!;c•' Otnp Lhoppl ng" but the tact 15. that this large corF~'`ra t.lon has !lk`1= ;; ' . nc'~~ r.. <>nr,ern fi>r th= srnzll b,sl nesses i!': cur c.>mmun;. ty. 1!':e'.C `=. f.lii : L:USI neB?. men rand Women, for the mOa part rE51de and W,:; 4 ~-:ray .:' R9nC-h0 r.!JCdflJn yd. Ne .U C G.': e_1ng T.O i'e 3nC more fam3 flee mC`I1 nQ ^Ut of the R3nOn0 Cu L.39Car-1d al'^~.: b9: di13Et Lh6 GIUSU Ye Cf (+F nEt .+l Uvnartilc's and Other .,=.-oe :nd~.^r. r; H Commune t.y 1-, on Ly .a strcrna as Che small ;eUS. ~:'l E'^,'1. •f ChP area. Lf '.ml`h °. .: .:1gUd L7 bU l.ld It 5 StO!'e and r,V Of }. he mP_r0 hdnt5 ,. ;, r,n =,1;r~~nu nxll n~ area well be fsrcetl to :.lose. Cu rr-ently many of :.he t0'~, e d:'2 ':?C'.3nt, h.h3Y. are ?9.3 t,Bd to the Vlne'.'ar''7 (;f:'Irt :rnl n'1 r. -,,,~ r,;x•, F„sr of [he nurpcs.ed new site. ' ,lr,.sr'~,7: 'loi=~= t, ,Jet the oPPOr tou`t'. rn mefe Y, you ii the . ..^U r~~,: ipnfl)n'1 b.ne~ w the pmt :.h'S Fnnd b JrU~=1 lagUB L nn thP. . .,.:, ;d :•.3 i:v yn'~I i.Va nCt? for yOUr GC n::ern~ `.:A nQei-eJ Y . Ronni L. Mendes 7201 Archibald, Suite 4-223 P.O. Box 7000-223 RarkJw Cucamaga, CA 91701 (909) 980-3153 -(909) 466-9599 (tax) January 10, 1993 .. I ~ ...(... ~ . ~OF RANECElyE0 AOMIN SN RA7IpH ONGA JAN 13~993 ~8,9Jp:. i i 4.5.5 Mayor Dennis Stout RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALL P. O. Box 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0907 pear Mayor SmuC As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I am taking this opportunity to express my concern regarding the 5mith's Food and Dtug store that is planned for the comer of Vineyard and Foothill. By going directly to the Rancho Cucamonga City Counctil, Smith's is attempting to circumvent the local building standards that all other retailers in this city had to conform to. The PLmning Commission has already denied Smith's. It is my strong opinion that the Planning Commission was diligent in their dudes to the community by making this decision. I am strongly urging you, as an elected official, to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. Make Smith's abide by the same roles as other businesses. Since Ronni L. Mend 8307 Vineyard Avenue, p7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /rlm so C i /) ~n / I ~ ~ ~ ~ l (i.. , ,~.i ,, ~Ef,°1'J'D •~ ~ ~ CITV OE RANChi!Ci1CAMONG? ~` ~ ~ ' ADM~t`°~TRAT!ON January 7, 1993 ~ ~!'.~ ~ JAN 131993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout ~ ~ i,!2,t,2,3.4.5.b Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 7,8,9,10, P.O. Box 8D7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Honorable Mayor Stout: I currently reside here in Rancho Cucamonga and my family and ? en icy the efforts of a City Council that takes great pride in the planning and beautif ice tion of this City. I recently became aware that Smith's Food b Drug is planni n9 Lo build a new store at Foothill and Vineyard here in Rancho Cucaino nga. I Hlso became aware that Smith's is trying to tlisre9ard any design requirements that the City has in place for the construction of new business. I would like to go on record in opposition to the City Council members ma k.i ng env concessions to the Smith's Food a Drug Corp. This may sound a little harsh. But the reality is that it may not be harsh enough! Smith's Food b Drug Stores offer a concept that sounds great, "Cne Stop Shopping" but the fart is that this large corporation has little or know concern for the small businesses in our community. These small business man and women, for the most part reside and work here in Rancho Cucamonga. ~We are seeing more and more families moving out of the Rancho Cucamonga area because of the closure of General Dynamics and other large industry. A Community is only as strong as the small business of the area. if Smith's is aloud to build it's store many of the merchants in the surrounding area will be forced to close. Currently many of the stores are vacant [hat are boated in the Vineyard Court ;hopping area ,lust East of the purposed new site. I sincerely hope to get the oFPOr tunity to meet you at the City Council meeting where the Smith's Food 6 Drug issue 15 on the agenda. thank you in advance for your concern! Sincerely, ~~ ~ I •1 ~a CITV OF RANCHO CDCAMONG~ '~~ ~ + ADMINISTRATION .L3r:U3r': 7. :94. tf. ' ~ i JAN 13 1993 laver ~ ._ .::'; _. cnut ~ %,8,9,10,11,12,1 2 3 4 E . ftanchn „~camonga City Nat: , , , . ' o r - . 7. .. , .. . 4G7 ~,'sn;hc C~..i °.amongr . CP '1729-OBG7 P,.^.rora l=_ Manor Gtout . ^Urreni lY' rE51 de !`ere In RaltChC CU CaR19nQa and m+~ fam17Y and , ?r 7o'. the effior is of a Cit': Oou Heil that tahas 91-e.nt nr"lde in Cne F lor•. r.; r+., acd r:eaa of icatiCn cf Chi.=. CiC/. .-even t.)v became away= that Smith e. Food S Rug ie planet ng Lc ru 11d ~ new =tore at Foothl 1.1 and ~'i neyard 'sere in Rar.che Cuc;amanp; .'I F1=o became aware that Smi th'e 1~ trving to disregard arty .251•.n ~"equl cements that the Clt'/ has In plane For' the con:. t.ruot.i nn of new buss Hess,. ~.a>u 1.d Lika to go or. reccrtl in nppo~i ticn to the City Council .n~~noer =, rnav.l ng any conceSSl one to the Jm]th'£. Food C Drug Gorp. ?his, rua': sauna s little harsh. But the reality a that 1t may not be harsh E:nOIJg~. .n.th :, :.,cd r: Crup 'Stores offer a rcnceFC that =:ountls gra_at. U"':e Ctor Sr,ePp%np" but the fac!, is tl'.a r. this larce corporation has 1 °~it.ln ~.' knew cnnr,::rn frn' the small busi Messes rn our c'.ommum t/. ?he~.e small bu ; nee=, n_n and womei; for the most. Hart reside anC .. r'i 4n n:: ho Cuoamon9a. lye aie ~,ee ing more and mare famr lion moor ny out of the F`anoho :~.cornorr-ra a. ea t: e.caue.a o~ the rlnsure of Senerai irv narnios and other I.u qe ~, •,_1u•;t ry. A Commune t/ .> enly as ;trnnq a": the 'small hu~c ;. re_s. or to=: sr ea. if ;mi [h'S r•s aloud to build f.'s CtCrF, many c= the merchant: ;r. the 'a.u~ro~,,indi na area wr;l 6s for ce.d to cl os ~. Current..'d many of !, ~'N LO"'r?^ •9 r'pq ~: ,p<ar'it tnaC at'.~.. ,r;yt~3 C1 La thF Vineyard Court ... ;tn~.; .'nr nlc. t', East of the c+u rposed new cite. + -,; r. ni ;t ; 'mr r,. t ., ~?et the r.,pporLuni tv tc meet ';you ar the ~. _, ., nn: ~';n~o whni r. thr- Smi `. r•.'_: 6cxs: d Drug issue is on the I n'. rd .,+u i:. :~dv.r Hoe for '/our r-.oncei n~ -,~ ~. ;~~. -. 0 _ _.. o m --i m ^1 N Q S T Y }. T N 2 O .ti U +~ U al C H M a O C C A 0 C o! E ~- E E mo ~ U m U y ~ } -+U kU A O E 0 W C 4 L A D C O C C O C O W - W '.L CO.K ~~ ~~ ~' I / /~ January 8, 1993 Mayor Dennis Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Dear Mayor Stout, r CITY OF RE(:E1VED aWCHO COCAMONGp AOMINIS7RpTI0N JAN 13 1993 7,8,9,10,tt,12,1,2,3,4,5,p I am writing you in regard to the proposed smith's Food and Drug retail store to be located on the corner of Vineyard and Foothill. It is my understanding that Smith's design of this store does not meet the local sfarrdards as far as they loading docks one conormed. It is also my understanding that the Planning Commission hinted down Smith's, and now Smith's is counting on the City Council to over ride the Planning Commission. As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I am strongly opposed to giving Smith's a lazge corporation, any special consideration. If odter stores had to go by dte rules and standards of the Planning Commission, then Smith's should also honor them. I urge you to please back the Plazming Commission on this issue. Wtretr this issue comes before the City Council, I am planning to attetrd. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Scott Collins 12584 Atwood St. #812 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91739 ~~~ ~~ F.anp;"b C, L'Ld;COnQd C1 tV HdlJ ~'.3 n.:.ho C~.,ca!a'v r.ca, CU 417?'~-09C7 ' ,CITY OF RgyCHO CUC ADMrNiSTRgr10~ONGa JAN 13 1993 ~,8s, io• r , : Iz:l.z,a.gss .:Ur'ently rP=.1de hE!'e ]. r. Rd rGhO CUOdmOnPa .And m`: family and c)n',' the effOr ts. Of :: CL t.v Cc.!nell t.hal t.3kes gl-eat pr}de ~ the , a~'din',1 anC f,BaL; lR fleatl0ft Of t.nle (11 LY. 8".8 r. :.i`: tECame 3War P. th3:. in',}i. ? ~ FOOd 5 Dru!r i5 pldm`1 nQ 4'.L~i <: 3 nevi EtOre dt POO t.h 111 aCG Vlne Var'd here In Ra nC hG C'.!c among,=.. ] E11sn became awarE that Srt:}Lh'S is tryln9 to tlvsregard an'; dBS V]r] reGUlr'ement5 :hat Lhe Clty has ]n F1.3c0 fOr Ch2 ~rrns true t;on cf nsw buElneES. i would 11 ke to go on reocrd 1n oppoEl tlcn f,n the Cvty Ccu nn}1 mr -,bE^s maklna any eoncecsl onE to the Sm1 th's Fnod S DruG Cc'.~c. Thy=. na'p ;:nu nd a l;ttle har^h. But the real}tY vs that 1t may not ',lm; th. '~,- .,,', 4 D"uy Otr,.res off=_r' s concept that sounds ;;r eat. 'Joe; Ct nR' &hnppln•]" bu[ Lhe fiact is that, thls laryP. corpora tl on has i of cie ~. '~-now r.nnc.?r'n for tha bma 11 bus: nesses vr. our rOmmu nl t•r. L"~~°:~ s.m;l! bus.;nes's. me?n and women, for thr most Past, reside and -. ~ .are Ln f~a nn ho Oucdmom.7a. bIN :u"=, '.tee a?g more and m.r'e famL lleo mnvvny out of the Ra nc.ho !-arr. ~,n>a area becau=,.P '.,f t. t',e alenure of General Uynamlcs. and other' . _~,C i:`ILPS tr'/. /d pOmnlUnl CV li Only dS EtrOn"7 a5. tha Small u=,I `!es'•. :., the ::rea. .~ ~ml t.h'=~ .= aloud to buLld 1k.'s 3LCre mar.v of the mEr :.hant=. Ln the SUrI-DU na log dY"E". wll,1 hr3 f01"Ced LO CIOSe. Currently many Of th.; :'. t,, rP-_ .are :•acanr that ar'e 1;~:_ated ;. r. the Vvnevdrd Ccurt. ": hr,:•c~ln^, :. .,. 'gust East !f T.he purposed naw 31t5. ,: n,-prcl.v rOF.^. LS: oet th9 C.pp ~>r LUnL ty tG meet '+UV 3L LhE1 .. (. :.:,~ : :; q•11'1'.: WhE'P E' LhP :h011J1 S FOOd b Ui 'Jq 15iUe lE Oll thEl I t i ~, .:,: ., ~• I r. adyd nOy fror' VOUI" cOnCern C.tnr: r3relY, ~~ ri i'.J ~D ~•..I xc: Lt. c3 r,.... ati ~Z ri ii:' }• M~- ':Li ~~4 Z ~~V ~~~ 0 0 -+ m ~1 N q ~~ S m J >, 5 Y ~ 0 ~+ C i' U A M F LC ff, 0 G T 0 O men-e s x o m U W U v 7 7 -+U %U d C of OC10 ML L 0 U ~ 0 C G O C c m d xao.a RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONG~ ADMINISTRATION JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: 7,8,9,1 O,11,12,1,2,3,a,b,b As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that hove gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headqunrtered out o£ state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements Lhe city has for all new businesses. I£ is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasses~.so.many. ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners ere residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, G.~.~ ~ 3 Z 36 C.~tZ7e.d w "~ January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Nall P.O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONG' ADMINISTRATION ~pN 191993 7,8,9.10.7 t ,t 2,1,2s,n.5,t As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviouely small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to Lhe planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encomgasaes~:so~.mang ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small buainesa owners out of buainesa. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, s % ~ v'E eK ,..,-u4N ~ ~ &'9s w F'~ ,r~ V'i~'sT lH «~ [ter-..-A 'M January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Rall P.0. Bcx 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: RECEIVED CITY OF NWCHO CUCAMONGh ADMINISTFIATION JAN 191993 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6 As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never berm occupied since completion, while many aze obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning conmisaion their disregard fox? design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief Lhat to allow a large store that encompasees~so~,many ventures to build hare, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners ere residents of this community who have met the Planning Department epecificetions. I Further urge a 'NO VOT&' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~Xo..~ ~~ January 15, 1993 RECEIVED CI1Y OF RIWCHO GDCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 191993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Ball 7,8.9,?0,~~' '~ ' P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small buainesaea that have gone out of basins sa. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our cormaunitl~. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new buainesaea. It is my belief that Lo allow a large store that encompaaaes:,eo'.many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. Z further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~ y2cY /,jo~+C Hr~NRd S c19U W, /9 r'4 /¢LTH Cc>w /f t ;• January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CITY OF NECEIVED RANCHO CUCAMONGti ADMINISTRATIOM JAN 191993 7,8,9,10,11,12, l ,[,a,.,, p,,, As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, i have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied 6uildinga, some of whicR have never been ocenpied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our coaasunity. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompaaees::eo~,many. ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~dn~ CQ SLl/ 4_Qza..~,~~ ar Januazy 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box R07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CITY OF RECEIVED RANCHO CUCAMONG:, ADMINISiRA710N JAN 19 1993 7,8,9,10,11,12,1;2,;i,4,b,b As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously smell businesses that hnve gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is heedquertezed out of stele is planning to build in our communit;+, They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasaea~so-,many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Deportment specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. _~ Respectfully yours, ,~ ~aru ~:dt ~8Z i Ca.x^~ `)i 7~/ ^ J' I CITY OF RANCHO~G ADMINISTRATI~O ONGP JAN 191993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: 7,8,9,10,tt,t[,t,~,a4,b.t As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously amnil businesses that have gone out of business. A largo chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our comsunity. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard foz design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encaapasses::so~,many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~r ~4~v K~u S/n an <.,~lo Gaca..,%n January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Rall P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stovtz G1Y RErF'vFD OAOM ~~c r~ ~ ~~`~ONGA ce p, N JAN 1 4 1993 7$9,70, ~ ~, ~~.. `~'~4.5,6 As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain stare operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. it is my belief Ghat to allow a large store that encompasaes::so~.many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances foz any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~y~<. ,cam v~ ,{ ~~ January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Eall P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CITY DE RECENED RANCI70 CUCAMONGR ADMINISTggTIDN JAN 191993 7,8,8,10.11,12, 1,2,y,q,S,6 As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which hove never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small buainesaea that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that ie headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning conmission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. IL is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasaes:;so~.mnny ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small buaineae owners out of. business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any buaineae, large or small. Respectfully yours,, O.Q.e-ti ~/~v.eft~ ~i.-u.+...-.~" ~; l January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Rall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CITY OF R N~p C~~OA dOMINISTRATION JAN 191993 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,d,q,g,6 As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have notieed~.many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many ere obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headqunrtered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. If is my belief that to allow a large store that encaspasaes~so~many_ ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for eny business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~/f>191 GS/l` P Qke~rodaQ p /(9M[Ir0 1.4 (.F MUN~a4 //7j0 ~~. r January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. BOx 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: C7Ty OF RECEIVED RANCNOCUCgMONGa ADMINISTRgpON JAN 19 1993 7,8s, ~ o, ~ , , ~ 2, ~ ,2, a,v s,t As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticedmany unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning conmission their fliaregard for design requirements the city has for all new busine saes. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasaes~so~,many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners ate residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, O ~ ~~/r T {y X ~' . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTpATION JAN 19 1993 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: 7r8,9,10,11,12,t,c,b.4 S,t As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, i have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, soma of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our communitl•. They have indicated to the planning co:mniasion their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasaes~.so~,many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are resiflents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours,//~~ .d/d* /39Y6 ~ d..fa~ .y G. ~wre ~+~./ /.aw< G~«.. ~• 9,739 I i January li, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Rall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: cl7y of RAN clo ~° ADMINISiRA7T~lON ONGn JAN 191993 7,8,9,10,17,12,7;L,3,4,5,b As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, acme of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompaeaes so,.many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTB' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~. ' ~_ January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CITY OF RIVED AOM ryCgTgATI0NA0NGA JAN 191993 7,8,9,1O,11,i2,1,2,3,4,5,b As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses thnt have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasees~;so~.many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO V0T6' on any and all future variances for any business. large or smell. Respectfully yours, /~ /'^"'°'~ /OLYI ~, ~~ - O y/lJo CITY OF RIVED ADM~IIVjSTDpCgTIOAMONGA JAN 191993 7,8,8,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregard for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasaes;;so~many ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours,//~~ 9 90 3 ~u~++~+v+C ~ . ~G. a,~w January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Aall P.O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: CI1YOf RECEIVED RANCHO CUCANIONDq ADMINISTRATION JAN 191993 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,x,5,6 As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed .many unoccupied buildings, some of which have never been ocenpied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A largr_ chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They hove indicated to the planning commission their diaregar8 for design requirements the city has for all new busineasea. it is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasses::so~,many~ ventures to build here, will only serve io drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any and all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours, ~7 ~, ~~ ss~ «,.~s.~.-~..><. ,~,. ~= r 1 a[t~IVtD CITY OF RANCHO CUCMAONOA ADMINISTRATION JAN 19 w93 7,8,9,t0.tt.t2,t,2,3.4,5,6 January 15, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Rancho Cucamonga City Nall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-087 Dear Mayor Stout: As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I have witnessed the enormous growth of our community. Recently, however, I have noticed.mny unoccupied buildings, some of which hove never been occupied since completion, while many are obviously small businesses that have gone out of business. A large chain store operation that is headquartered out of state is planning to build in our community. They have indicated to the planning commission their disregnrd for design requirements the city has for all new businesses. It is my belief that to allow a large store that encompasee s:,5o~man$. ventures to build here, will only serve to drive many small business owners out of business. The majority of these owners are residents of this community who have met the Planning Department specifications. I further urge a 'NO VOTE' on any anfl all future variances for any business, large or small. Respectfully yours,'~`~`.2~/ A ~~ ~ O ~~` ~0. ~~ ~ ,~;, `n~ '.~,qon ~ ti'n."g'l ~ 1P~o"n 1 . ylnu`, i"~ ~M1•R 'wR;_ E 2~ p~~sg. ~ ~ ~ ~$p $~~tx~ a 2i2~ z~- n~ ~ ~~ '~z~~a~s~ ~ `> a~a~~W ~= ~5'g g~ ~ E ~z s'~E.~~ F ~ ~ 2_.S 3 'Y 56`J 6C 33 ~yGR ~ =f ~ 3`x3.5 O ~ "= n g ~ 2 n ~ z x x ~ ~c ~~ c n A s A ~ ~ A ~ ~ ? '~ ' ~ gg ~ ~ ? ~ s _ dm 7 y ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~a ~ r.~ E ~ > > . ~~~ _ g eat `~' R v r "7 C n § 6 e 3 c F 3 a ~ H ~~~r'~ ~~~~~ ~~~~y~~ c s=~5 j m O m m D ~ m "r' n v {~ 3 -°'i m 8 ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ $ w a w w y ~ .._ N~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b I( ~'. i '.C mn+ 8 ~ ^ ~ g ~^ n r og A ~ y m Y ~ $ m '- ~ C ~ ~ 6' ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~A ~ ~ ~~~ w N~~ ~~~ m ~~~~~~ '~~"~ ~~ ~. z.~ Q d i w m m q. m Q~ ~ ~ ~kk w o .. ~.. N ~ ~ ~ ~ ae ~' ° w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + A as Y . ae a^ as Op 6 gg Y? m C ~~ a a ~ ~ a ~ `3 s~~ 8 $ b v. ~~ ~ s ~ ~s .. ~z ~ ~ ~ g ~s °~ , ~ ~rN ~gH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Ed de !C eP y~ffi aQ aE de ,~~°. 3Q ~ ae ~8 M ocus on Tomorrow Highlights of 1991 During 1991 Smith's achieved some significant results. The Tolleson Distribution Center opened in Arizona, as did the Tolleson Dairy.. Smith's opened 17 new stores and remodeled six. New technology was added to automata front-end and back-end scheduling, to automate bookkeeping and to automate time and attendance records. During this time, Smith's experienced record sales and profits. Smith's growM has provitled opponunifles for people to advance their careers. Mae than 90 percent of the management posfhons In California were filled by existing Smith's people. Smith's grew from 15,289 employees on January 1, 199010 more than 18,000 on January 1, 1992. Technology is helping to maximize eight-hour shifts for These empbyees. Automated time, attendance and bookkeeping help us operationally, and will support our growth throughout ihe'90s. Plans for 1992 1992 will be an equalty exciting year. Our aggressive expansion schedule includes opening 15 To 18 new stores this year. More than half of these stores will open in Calitomia. The remaining stores will open In these existing areas: two in New Mexico, two In Arizona, one In Nevada, and one in Park City, Utah. In addition, nine stores ore schetlukjd fa remodeling. This agerxia honors our canmlMrent that no Smith's store will go beyond 10 yeas without being completely remodeled. In closing. Rkhle and I are convinced we have the very best people in the supermarket business, Please accept our personal thanks fa all you do at Smith's. We hope you share our pride In our past accomplishments and our enthusiasm fa 1992. ll c, orporate Philosophy INTRODUCTION We are in me footl industry. but actuolry we ore in me "people Business." Our success in the food industry is determined by our success in serving our customers: othacfing and holding capable dedicated employees; and maintaining good business rapport wim our suppliers. Our basic philosophy for dealing with all mree groups is me same. and it is simply me Golden Rule: We want to heat our customers ,employees and suppliers as we ourselves would like to De heated, LOUR CUSTOMERS: We will provide our customers clean, modem supemnaNefs which offer a wide selection of merchandise, athactively d'uplayed, and fairN and competitively priced. Additionally. we wont to offer our customers friendlier antl more courteous service man any omer supermarket. We honestly wont to be meir "Favorite Store." II. OUR EMPLOYEES: (A) Our employees are a primpry key to our success. To attract and holtl top people, we pay top wages. offer maximum hinge benefiR by industry standards, and provitle o pleasant family atmosphere in which to work. (B) We maintain high standards for employee performance. We believe in The Free Enterprise System of rewarding people according m meir abilities, and time and effort put form. We want to shore the profits of our company wRh mose who help produce me profits. Employees are fudged on meir actual performance in meeting company objecflves. There b no place in our company for poor substandard pertormance, (C) We expect complete honesty and loyalty to me company, and we expect all employees to live by me rules and regulations of me company. Employees should always be guided by a sense of personal honor which is one of the most precious possessions in life. If any employee has a question about a course of action, the answer should instinctively be: W what Is right emlcally and morally proper, Dishonesty cannot and will not be tolerated at any level or in any relationships wim customers, suppliers or omer employees or the company (D) We wont positive, active minkers, because we recognize we live in a time of constant change. Therefore we will provitle an atmosphere in our company where suggestions for improvement are freeN exchanged, evaluated and acted upon. We must seas and exploit every new opportunity to get me'pb done in a more effective and efticlent way. (E) Collectively, we must have an Intense tlesire to be number one. We must all be builders. DecWons must be company decisions, not one mpn'S decisions. We must all SeCOntl-gael5ers Wf10 dent get mek OWfI Way. (F~ We will play no favorites. All empbyees are to be heated equalN and fairN. We mointdn on "open tloof' policy. If any empbyee minks ne nos been heated unfairly. he can take his complaint io me next highest official ... right up to me president of the company. (G) In order to prowde career opportunities for our people, we must commit ourselves to a sound, planned pattern of growm. To finance and grow, we must hove profit. And to be profitable we must hove loyal and protluctlve employees who want to succeed and hwe me company succeed. (fQ The management of mis company makes ms cornmifnieni fo aN empbyees: No empbyee wiN ever become OI be treated as a nurrrber, but rather will alv+ays be heated as an Individrml whose worth b equal to any omer ertlpbyee w officer of mis company. That all employees will be heated wim me some fairness and fie management redlines mat growm creates ezha demands on me time of key individuola creating sUuotions which sometimes can be mis{nterpreted as lack of interest In me weMore of an indMdual or Group of III.OUR SUPHLIERS: Our suppllen pre on invaluable Ilnk In our chain of success. We must be as fair antl honest wUh our suppliers as we are wim our customers and employees. We want to be tirn and demantlirg, but never mmless. IV. OUR COMPANY: Our company must merit and earn the respect and loyalty of our customers. employees and suppliers, Success. growth and progress are winning characterlsttcs ...and everyone wants to be with a winner. We wont a company where every one of us Is proud to say.. . "Smith's Food & Drug; That's My Company." e facts on the table, make me decisbn. There ur Prescription for Improved Customer Service in the Pharmacy An effective remedy for improving customer-pharmacist l° relations has proven successful in the newly updated design of fix: our in-store pharmacies, ~~` Specifically, the format changes will serve to enhance the professional. personable counseling pnd information our pharmacists and technicians provide our customers. A floor-level change now brings our pharmacist to the customers' eye level. Elimination of the glass partition }ha} previously enclosed the work area now provides a more personal environment for customer interaction and counseling. Smith's Food & Drug Centers offer the besT in prescription medication service. Our pharmacists are able to fill most orders within 10 minutes. We believe }hat the best way to keep our customers happy is To give them fast and efficient service, os well as any information Yhey may need. ustomer Service is Priority One No other supermarket offers as wide a variety of service for our customers as Smith's. At our Customer Service CenTer alone, shoppers can buy stamps, mail a package. purchase tickets to a conceR or sporting event, get a money order, and cash checks at no charge. Customers can have something photocopied, send a FAX or pay a utility bill os well. A rededication To customer service is the emphasis for all store and office personnel in 1992. An intensive customer service campaign is being launched in all of our operoting areas that will incorporate paining videos, employee surveys and heightened in-store awareness. All of this will be communicated to our customers through new television, print, and outdoor advertising. Providing a pleasurable shopping experience for each of our customers is SmiM's frm commitmenT. ,a~,~I `" ::11 '~, 4y Y :. ~?AI ecoming a Part of the California Dream The dream is now reality. Nine stores ore open and operating in Southern Colifomia. Our construction, engineering and store set-up teams undertook one of the most aggressive store opening schedules in itre Industry and successfully met each deadline to open all stores on schedule) SmiM's usual schedule h to open a store in 26 weeks... In some instances, our stores in Calffomla were opened in just 16 weeks) Averaging 80,000 square teat, our Caltlomla store format Is one of the most modern in the supermarket Industry. We feaMe Innovative new boor plans that maximize category and product adjacencies. Our variety of specialty departments are showcased in a beautiful Interior decor pockage. More than vlsualty appealing, h is In keeping wiM the CalRomia lifestyle. ~4: aking the Most of Your Investment How can we worK together to reduce the cost of doing business for you and Smith's? • Electronic Dato Interchange (EDI) • Cross DocKing • Jus} In Time Delivery • Conhaci Buying • Cenhal Buying • Drop Shipping • Layer /Pallet Ordering • Reduce Required Lead Time • Buying In Best 8rackel • Improve Out-Of-Stocks Service Level • Annual Promoibn Planning • Dealing Wi}h Decision Makers • Measuring Effectiveness of Actions /Follow Up Meetings • All Allowances OH Invoice •Account-Specific Marketing • Other Opportunmes alue End, Check-Out End VALUE END PROGRAM Value ..the key mgredlont In our exclfing value end program The enormous success of this program is martainod ih~ough the selection of those demand items that represent real value to the consumer, Through negetiatior. anU applicat'~~or of o!i product allowances into COST Of a00d5 a prod Uai price-VOIUe re;ailpn$nlp S BS1CbhSned that simply Ca^ t be peafl So Important is this program rr Srndhs arc our vsndors. Ihot we ve asked our scremahc: department to dovelop a computer program to track all value erd acir,i}y A simple computer print-out details the value end~cap position,, availabihN and item duration for every stare in the Chain, month by month. Don t miss the opportunity to have yeurvolue-priced proauct feahrted cn a maximum exposure enacap for an ensue mo^ih in every Smith s store Hsk your buyer how to obtain c Vale Ena Cap, "CHEAP" PROGRAM Its your last chance to catch shot customer before thpv leave the store Ard there is no greoter placo than rh,n rneck-out end' And shots lust the beginning rt~s flrxcle too. Choose one end or cnaose all of them. Vou r_hr; ass •ne pion that worus the best for you. .., !~ ;k~Urd Ends Always Produce rno.. $20°° ,., s80oo aking Customer Service Our First Priority Our'21 Shoos UnCer Ore Roo`' format truly addresses fhe ene-stop shoFPing concept anU brings convenience and variety to oar customers • Grocery Store • Drug Store • Dlsr_ount Pharmacy • Videc Center • Soup and Salad Bar • Juice and Melon Bar • Growers Market • Cosmetics Salon • Tortilliaria • Fresh Fish Market • Specialty Meat Shop • Sausage Shop • Variety Store • One-Hour PhoTo Shop • Chinese Kitchen • Dry Cleaners • Corner Cafe • Wine and Spirits Shop • Servic° Deli • Bake Shop • Floral Shop • Yogurt Shop • Nutrition Center • Bulk Foods General Store • Smokehouse "We've got d oil together .~ l iva Espanol! Growing aT a rate six times faster Than any other segment in the United States, the Hispanic malkeT represents purchasing power in excess of'7 70 billion. Currently 10 percent of the population, or 24.9 million people in the U.S. are Hispanlc. By the year 2015, it is estimated that The Hispanic populaTion will comprise 28 percent, becoming the largest ethnic group in ttie counhy! To address this growing and important segment of the market Smith's has integrated special Hispanic sections in-line in our grocery, produce, housewares, cosmetic and health and beauty care categories in the markets where the Hispanic populations dictate. Our scan-data information system suggests that these merchantlising shategies are paying olf. In stores #713 Oxnard, California and #515 EI Paso, Texas, scan-data indicates that name brand items such as A9UA NET, COLLATE and ALBERTO V-OS are moving ai rates that far exceed that of chain average. In-store Tortilliarias. Spanish greeting card sections. speciality spices and candies, Spanish store tlirectories and signage, as well as Spanish language versions of our television and radio commercials are just some of }he ways Srnith's is keeping pace with the growing Hispanlc market. emonstrated Sales Pertormance Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc, is a leading regional supermarket chain operating in the Intermountain, Southwestern and Southern California regions of the United Slates, Smith's principally develops, owns and operates combination food and drug centers which offer a full selection of supermarket food items. a wide assortment of non-food and drug items and a number of specialty deporfinents. We offer customers the widest product selecfion at everyday low prices, Our customers are able fo fill a substantial portion of their daily and weekly shopping needs ai one convenient location. We believe this to be "A Better Way }o Run a Supermarket" 1987 1056M 20% 1988 1393M 32°/D 1989 1732M 24% 1990 2031 M 17°/D 1991 2217M 9% S2soo 52000 Sim Siooo 5~ 50 rket Shore access K r~, ~.m r~ .~~ The above market share data has been compiled by the Research Department of Smlih's Food & Drug Centers, Inc, using staflsilcal sampling methods designed by the C~.xrpany applied on a basis consistent with prior periods. ~:,~ ~,,,~ ~.~~ ~~.,~ ~s% r,b reas of Operation • Idaho - 5 stores ~ major distribution center • California - 9 stores • existing stores ave Reviews mith's Team of Preferred Suppliers Smith's Provides: Manufacturer Provides: • Shelf Position Preference All Available Funding • More Depth to Product Line Flexibility • Time-Business Planning Sessions Volume Incentive Rebate • First Opportunity on Promotional Programs DURACELL 1 BDF•••• NEUTROGENAS i~ IJrI~ '8i ristol-Myers f3eiersdorf Inc (JIOyt@X ~I/EYEREADV. REVLON L'OR~AL° ~I~N ENERGIZER SANDOZ ®• ~ ~ .~~ NICE-PAK CLAIROL Anchor l1< < OMOCking ,4mbassador :;~ ,.~~~ ~ ~ f =.7 ~~iit-=m ® ~l ~ l ~ CUt'Cd. Gillpne 'fVestle® Kenr~A~rFUruRO CONF~B/,- Slirn•Fast. ~ ~ ~ ~~, kerrwlPs KNAFT ~Colgat+e' ~rz~nPr. r7~ PBAA/GOCO Anse ALLERGAN~,p~O//P~~TICAL THOMPSON MEDICAL COMPANY Burroughs Wellcome C Chesebrough Ponds USA Co. d Scherirx}Plouoh HeaBhCare Products. (~iEMTEF: -~_"~~' apitalizing on New Opportunities Smith's believes that our success in building market presence can be attributed to our aggressive pricing policy At Smith's we are deepPy committed to our everyday low price strategy, and long term goal of low cost operation, Through contract pricing we can consistently pass the savings on to our customers and in doing so, ;ncrease sales and market share of both our company and our valued vendor partners. • EVERYDAY LOW PRICE POLICY Smith's everyday contract pricing offers the manufacturer o consistent everyday low price on his/her product •INCR[ASED MARKET SHARE Smith's everyday low price strategy b manufacturer market share and esta competitive environment. • EFFECTIVE INVENTORY/SHIPPING/SERVICE LEVE Through contract pricing a manufact efficiently control his/her inventory lei and overall level of service, as JIT deli critical issue for bath retailer and mar • SAVINGS TO THE CONSUMER Determining contract costs on manul pmducis allows for a retail strategy th Smith's to pass the savings on to the c • PRICING EDGE OVER THE COMPETITI Contracr pricing participation affords monufociurer a significant pricing ed~ aampellt~Ve brands that are not parts conhaci pricing program. • ANNUAL PROMOTIONAL PLAfJNING Contract pricing partners are offered opportunity to pion promotions and specific participation throughout the year with their non-foods buyer •INCREASED INVENTORY TURNS Contract pricing increases inventory turnover fcr both the retailer and the manufacturer. This resin}s in increased bottom line profits, • 6UANTITV ORDERING To minimize a manufacturer's shipping and picking costs. Smith's invites manufacturers to discuss ordering product by layer or pallet. • DECREASED ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS The administrative costs involved in processing claims and excessive research are greatly diminished far both the retailer and manufacturer. oundations Growth sro~<, ~; ~ 3 Oxr~rd Ca'~rf^: rna si ,....: ~~„ oundations for Growth 5, .~ . •' q F.~ ^r'^~ CoU`:J~r ~ s~~~~ ::~.~s ~anraster Cairfomio n~tlb,, ~: rrf~-rn~a can Data Services WHAT'S AVAILABLE? • All general merchandise and HBC categories. • dPC scan information from 1-115 stores. • Customized studies developed for manufacturers or market research departments. WHV SMITH'S SCAN DATA? • All stores in 15 markets are on-line, located in the Intermountain, Southwest and California Regions. • Prompt one-week }Urn around on Scan data information, • Provide specific produc} pertormance data by market and/er store, Number Fixeo Price Number of Fixed Price Number of Fixed Price WHO'S SUBSCRIBED? of Items Bracketll'1 Stores Rrnctref!'1.9 wPP4c HrnrLCrT•3 '.-5 1,66 18 11.45 L4 1303 615 2.77 3-5 1527 58 20.86 1635 3,96 610 19.09 9-13 25.63 3670 5.43 llaa 23.86 14-19 30.36 71-125 7,17 19-30 29.62 24.26 34,96 126245 9.15 31-47 3628 27.34 39.35 206320 11,33 48.70 43,72 35Qr 44.07 321.500 1379 71-100 51.87 44.53 47.50 501-850 16,80 101-1.38 64,66 851-1,500 21.15 139.185 70.05 1,501-2,500 27.00 186242 80.00 2,50'.-5,000 33.75 5,001.14,400 45.00 14,441-20, 64,04 20.001-40, 9000 an ur~W ~~~-..~ ~~ s, x,•,mm +,~,o-nn mmnrw~ m~ nnr,np,,,in ^~ •~ marvAr r•r• irn xv-n m m• nimrt tnlrpnn.v M1m q.gmrJa WL(AH AMOIIN! IA P'IlDiH ~hI.U,Vi yx !M")ll.nH.:MnIIN l ix I GUAR nMOUnp A=i0L11- Ca^ i TAMBRANDS Feminine Hygiene REVLON Shampoo ST. IVES Shampoo L'OREAL Cosmetics BRISTOL-MEVERS Analgesic L'EGGS Ponlyhose MENNEN Lotion Division WHITEHALL Analgesic For more information and a specific plan for your prolecf. please concoct'. Michael Oxborrow Director. Space Management and Market Information Smith's Food & Drug Censers, Ina 1775 Wesi 1500 South Sall lake Cily UT Bd104 (AO p 974.1401 NFOSCAN® Infoscan is a naTionol scanning service that tracks sales, market share, dishibution, price cnd promotional activity of all UPC-caded products. Smith's is utilizing Infoscan To develop merchandising decision oriented products and services for retailers and manufacturer representatives who influence retail decisions, Smith's is using Information Resources main frame Data ServerTM as The delivery and analytic fool for their buyer-merchandisers. The following is a list of key issues which Smith's buyer-merchandisers are addressing Through the Infoscan system, • Which categories are growing? Declining^ • Is Smith's getting it's fair share of category sales In the marketplace? • How well ore new products pertorming in }he market and at Smith's? • What iTems are in the market that Smith's is not carrying? Should Smith's stock them? • What items should be deleted in the category? • How are promations doing? Is Smith's under or over-promoting compared to the market? • How well are the vendors performing in the market and at Smith's? • Whai product mix will Smith's need To carry when it enters a new market? • Are Smith's promotional strategies effective against the competition? INFOSCAN® CATEGORY GROWTH PERFORMANCE -%CHANGE IN SALES 1990 VS 1991 ORAL NvcIENE VOAMINS DIET AIDS NASAL SPRAV UJIJGN Pvr11P 0.0 100 20.0 300 ~SMIM'S ~MARKEt 'NF f A1(fiClrv G1YJV/M PERFORMANCE FEN41 yqW$ Mf CHANGES M IkAI AALCS AtSMI11151N WF AlBgCIUFRgUE MARKET glgN61%1 PV U£vA1M 5N'N n RfeONr Mi BIrvER MFIK'NAN[4¢R CAN OFRRM'14 W41CH CAIEGOPE! ARE bPMY1NG OR IYr;IIWIM. 4NO WNEMER SMMS IS GROWS fAti,FR OP SLOWER MAN MF MARNFI IN MfY Nf"CAIEGOTFS )i AI 11 2J 1R A 18A OB os 110 R] INFOSCAN® SHAMPOO/CONDITIONER VENDOR PROMOTIONAL RESPONSE 'o INCREASE IN BASELINE UNIT SALES ME ,rtrvocR PROMOnorvAL RE~ausE coMPARES ro PROMOtroNAL RESPONSE O PROMOnONS WiiNIN A CAifGORr i0 E VfNCORS PMMkI'pNAL IMPAC' ON NLE$ W ~ 251 ~ 170 189 t~ loD ~ 47 49 44 0 D FEANRE DISPLAY FEANREB PRICE REDUCTION aNLY ONLV DIS%AV ONIV _ VENDORA ~SMRH'S 1NF R6PJPI PIONS MAI VEryD(K A ACHIEVFSIHF GPEAft51 &^O511N SALES L~llfw. Ka %.bMO'Ip1¢WHICH INCLUCF CGTAV p1AV Mf.C`14yMOlION$Af,NIEyER yGWNCAMIYGRARP SLLESINCRE0.5E5 A15yBIN5:HAN 1NEY fM01N 1Nf MARKFI I W`n MINCREASE V$ IiN,INCFEAY INFOSCAN® SHAMPOO/CONDITIONER PROMOTIONAL RESPONSE BY VENDOR ^A INCREASE IN BASELINE UNIT SALES INf PRgd01'CWAL RFSRWY RPORi BV YFNDOR SNOW ME RRCEM iNCGEnSF M FACN vFNWR'S lM1T SP1E5 Wr'ICN WAS ACMEVfO WRING MCMaIICNS fIIMNG ME HAP ENDORA ENDORB EN[bR C ENDOR D NDORE NDORF ENDOR G ENDOR 11 ENDORI ENDORJ ENDORK I~ 103 21J 153 JCR 1~ 118 10.) 1 J 6 i)4 NFOSCAN® CAiEGORV PERFORMANCE VS. VEAR-AGO/PERFORMANCE VS. MARKET SHARE VENDOR PERFORMANCE VS. VEAR~AGO scan Pe~ods 52 Weeks Entlin {J Noe 2d, 1 W 1 SCpn Ma'ke13 Soll Gpke CiN UI C>wm. NON SNIt •: bm yMPS Ga~ eµ 9v^d NaYH ~y PIGS Yfefn PM S}ct } >s~ Wg. yeS,PW ba vea.Arp Gnm M SrmrGOp) 'EGORY~DEOCORAM I 11:6M 25745 413fA5M1 30,765 qL5 09 0 IDORA 2 3314M 8023 855.455 ~1,Od2 J94 2.' ~17,58.5B IGOR9 3 .3149M <<"3,1JI 865.909 52.501 364 G.5 44454.2 IDORC h 262oM ~104&I 552.516 d7p12 475 20 33,189,4 IDORD 5 1735M 9,586 395,851 -38,109 478 1.6 9,219.8 IDDRE 6 1287M 10.410 304,859 )4.052 42,2 ~15 2.166.5 IDDRF 7 1175M B,J69 316,548 22,715 J]I 0,0 13.884.4 This ~epoe shows IrFms WhiC.~ war4 sok) .n me Son Lpxo Cary MaA'e: wh¢M1 Sm4h's is nor cunarlry cprmrg melai n stew: srn,m~: c annual apportu~eN edlars srauld Ivey dacha to curly These rcems INFOSCAN® ITEMS NOi CARRIED CATEGORY-HAND&BODV LOT ION Perotl 13 Weak ErMirg Nw 24, 1991 ~ r I dyer Market Salt Lpka CiN UI So in ~ Mmar PMr[~ aG.sl Fv+ I1M11 WY Rke 31 SIEVENB USC SkNZP CRMR Bcz 00525]310008 3,304 d6 385 111 858 23: SIEVENE FRGFR SKN2R CRM 4oz 00525]) OON4 30(N 51 W8 5B 349 B.3 WCNDRA WC SkA4f`lR4 IOOZ 0031000001)9 IABI 91 545 93 482 41f SUAVE REG SKM2R LIN 125oz 00 )940010460 1.28) 103 611 oB 190 215 SIAVE AEG Sk'MJtIRl rDBf9 l0 oz 0019411014230 1025 113 All 19 lAb 52: INFOSCAN® eve ve4w uwew Era nr n rve lJ w c ME~ A 261W1 NEW ITEMREPORT `~24 I%I CATEGORY BAht PROD UC i S . we e oe MnYar SM I~Le ~iN N ~p t m n ama ~~ 4 r be Stlei ' Mc r.Mel pwmnd' I `maM' ..}t Rbs RvF UrM hP~ rvJer bUS Lw6 Ms• lA&1 REG CLGM 120] 00464410124] 2,100 0 353 J6 A13 115 Bd 100,0 COrv NLN45 ClG4 ISOZ 00310551211) !.526 2J 290 dB 526 161 7d 99.3 NANRES FM HREL BLBM J2 oz W11996 M9dJ 1,305 3,J 6% 13 199 115 I 1000 NANRES FM 9CV 0LBM J2 oz 001199654944 1,3~ 3d 656 14 199 115 2 100,0 PRIfq REG CIGN OSoz 002616908615 I.p4B d0 210 CO 499 165 93 101.3 COZY EMERD REG CIGM Boz ro31655123ft5 alb I9 Io5 7] 495 156 9d 998 iPBU CLLR 2a 004644]00521 141 00 DD 152 Ild4 P,5 100 100,0 ASRNFRW RG CIGN OSOZ 00482)500.122 132 91 A IJV 451 175 95 IOp.O MNI&'MUg(REG CLGN OSOZ 00261A901.519 I20 vJ l46 06 e9v ]]5 v4 100,0 ACP&1M RSE BIMG B156z WIV04501410 621 lOd 141 85 421 45fl 0 1000 VMIIXGBIIt PEG ROUM IJO] 00>508904000 618 105 .M 219 1)11 1]4 JI 1000 A R R R 1 W ~ p 50 416 0 5l) I ~ a 1 42 11a ~ Iro0 i SPEN R EG 17 oz 4 82 D 0 2 l d 4 200 3 fl 5 S'NCUIRp RE6 &BM 125w WIp0N V0004 55G 110 dot 2d 4)3 ]>5 IW 1000 CACHF AfG CIGN J2oz OO 4509335991 502 121 OD I00 SJ9 715 8I 1000 CHPNBiIV REG PRFbM 125 of 001126115130 415 105 J2 230 9II 1I5 )3 1000 IAAV SIEISONffGCIGN 25nz WJIb551205) dJ5 1do 92 12J 10.5 115 ]9 1000 AM8r5N MUSH ClGt4 120t 0046MI59415 Jv4 I55 68 150 20) )]0 vl 1000 LERIEUR AF.G liRS PIS OZ OO JIU512556 Jet 158 J9 210 1CO 110 100 100,0 Al]R 5%v REG RIRS 250oz 0026169 WI12 365 103 49 IB2 201 11.5 14 1000 Isle new item repM Ibh aP new 4ezro for tirec tluln99 Ills Iasi l weeks. It rot oNy hocks the or~i rew Jerpm~ dip haCMi MB tKKB SNM1 copMee firm hw ca]wet4lOn. Smi1MS oclrieve0 p dl 51E Thee of Te eeobaant category n itre Sah lake City Market Writ wO[a.WF lncrepsa vi. Yepr'p9o SrNM's categoy doper soles Increases vs. previau yarn by'25,Jd5 while tots aanars in hre market vecreased bY'3o,]65. VBMa B b the lop perfortnrq yentlar 1n iha market bW has an opportaniN 91we deficit of 51%'wt Smith's husirleu Thu repesenh'4d.45d of lost opporM1+rkN tldla5, wilding Presence Through the Advertising Program We're excded about the opportunities avddoble to bu'~Id your business through creative advertising and innovative rrsrchandising programs. For 1992 we have some new progrm opportunities to helo drive sales and builtl market share. The look for our prin. cds this yeor will be four or eight page tabloid size mailers. These will be+ied in with key ad themes cnd fJll-cobr role mailers which are distributed around important holiday weeks. Weekly GrcJlofiorr Intermountain Region .. 1,359.412 `ouf~west Region .. 1.938 330 Cchforn'~a Region ......587,672 total Weekly Circulohon 3,885,414 In addition to our prm! od program. we a:e offenng an exrifing new option for you to target a portion of your advertising dollars TPR (Temporary Price Reduction) This is our new program which will enable us to Put fJndS against select produal5 to rnduce re!ails and drive Sales. Creative merchondising dnd Special rrstore signwork are sure to make tn~s program a SUCCeSS~ P,eCause iurllted ODparfurotlES ao avavanle, see your buyer now and reservo space for your , products today rand OpportunitiE at Grand Openin Smith's Grand Openings are really something special! We go al out wi}h pre-opening campaigns on billboards, radio, newspaper ads and direct mail to the area. They are so exciting that customers usually begin lining up ai lec an hour before the scheduled opening...rain or shine. We serve donuts, coffee and hot chocolate as a courtesy to those in line. ~ invite you to use your imagination as far os what you would like is do to be a part of this event, Tell us what you woultl fke to do and we will see whoa can be worked out. The following are examples of what vendors do and have done: Soft drink bottlers give away six-packs to the first 500 through the door. Many vendors participated in our 0uy-One-Get-One-Fred offers. Many scheduled samplers to Blve away sama!es or tastes of their product along with manufacturer's discount coupons. Some have special character costumes and have these characters on hand to greet the children. And of course. many offer special deals in order }o have a price point advantage in our Grand Opening ads, GRAND OPENING AUERNATIVES'. • Special Promotional Price • Special Dnting Program • Giveaways • Vendor Demonstration • Special Instant Coupons • Promotion/Prize Contribution igns of the Times Advertise your product to your customers day and night every doy for 30 days with Smith's outdoor bi!Iboord program Increase new product sales, take advan}age of seasonal shopping or add a boost in volume) your message will be strategically located along }he major routes throughou~ metropolitan areos, on the same roads your customers use to go to our stores, Billboards remind Ihem to buy Your product as they are heading for the store in o mood to shop and buy. Add a hot price-point and watch your product move through the checkstands even faster! Vou can choose Bom two 345hee? billboard packages. Eoch package includes art produc}ion and silkscreening production of the paper for the billboard posting. Illustrations must be line art and can have up to four different ink colors. Half-}one reproduction, complicated illusiraYions or additondl colors will be es}ima}ed before production and you will be informed of any additional charges. Produc}ion lead time is o minimum of 45 days. PACKAGE A - A 25 GRP showing which reaches 25 percen} of the metropolitan population daily. PACKAGE B -.4 50-GRP showing which reaches 50 Fercent of the metropolitan population daily. MULTI-MARKET DISCOUNT -When omultiple-market package is purchased for the same month, 0 10 percent discount will be applied. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING RATES NUMBER OF DAII-V MONTHLY MARKET BILLBOARDS CIRCULATION REACH/FRE9. COST PACKAGE A Soft Lake 12 210,000 82%110 '7,400 La Vegas 9 192.057 75%/10 `7,100 Reno 5 63,000 76% / 8 '4.100 Phoenix 22 496.525 77%/9 '15,300 Albuquerque 8 1^5,000 76%/8 X6,100 tucson 9 154,150 76Wo / 8 '8.100 El Paso 12 381,000 7B% / 18 '7,300 PACKAGER Soft lake 23 420,000 88°k / 18 '12.900 Las Vegas 16 384,114 83%/19 '11,400 Reno 10 127600 Bb%/ 15 '6,900 Phoenlx 44 993,050 87%/ 15 '29,400 Albuquerque 16 250,000 83%/ 15 '10,300 Tucson 17 308,300 eb%/ 15 '14,200 EI Paso 20 568.000 87%/ 25 `i 1,400 ,,s ;,yY: ~;; ` ~, ~~;~y''~'n2 s'C Y~ ... n ~ iYQ:.'.... ~' Net sobs $2,217,437 $2,03],373 $1,731,559 Net Income 65,097 34,314 2$,131 Net Income pn cararlorr shore 105 138 118 ONMends per wrrinrerr Mem ,38 .28 .10 Average Camlar lllere4 27,397,873 26,272,011 24,979,283 Net property erM pulpnram 881,350 837,312 513,346 Total Deets 1,198,689 M3,718 721i,48T StockhoMms'eWNy 471,358 2ti8,198 240,920 Book vMn per Mere 15.83 10.83 9.b9 Nunkn Maloroa 109 95 98 Total store pone [Dotage 8,773,000 5.550,000 6.28b,000 SmMA'a cone a Onrt Cwdsrs. Irra a e leeelK reQmel aupsmMMet chsln a0aratkt M to Imamrantak, SoulhwaQam and Soutlum CWlDrnle mpma d the Ihdtee 9bhs, u1N 109 stain M Mrare, CMlanla~ Idsla, NarMY, New MaxkD, Taxes, Iltsh sna WYerriMrt sreretfit 07.100 spraro lat. s BwpsnMittD toOsT's afisrrOri(arrsrsrrer needs. SAnlm's Ms aaslsced s sfsta9f7heart cDrrrfibratlsrr kse arrd drat polar that OrDVldas onastop shop9krt 74 hpxs a daY• Tfisse kuts peters, raeWdrit ta1pNT 9t arM sceclan tlsks, Doer the wlast aekatbn M nstbrWy adrsrtNae loa sod ranked preducts a web w pWlty Prkate kMN Bern. FaM store b s1aMd wMh halphd, fiNrrdly errrplDyees Mq 0realea customers w8h M checkout arM DsnT-aol earekros, m adeF tkn, a vadety or apsckely dsvartnrerra altar takeout cldn.a ane/a Mexkan kp, wataur vhatD gowsMi{, NdaD mitNS, .orbs ane coop bars, gap.ree fiats, fish esh, dry ckardryp Konen mart awls, hdFasrvk+ trardrfirg tacBXka and moan moro. Toes. cams. ere amore fiy amanyowpe, rally krta~srod eMtrlfiulla IacllMks. > smllnY wa /Doodad m 1998 sne nNaorporslee under Daleware ka M 1989.Our ea:pY ex- ecuthe ollkas are IoeatW M Belt lake CRy, Ilteh. Ta Canpwrys Gsse B CDrrsrran 9arar a treaae a the INw Yak Stack ExonaNa areer to symhW "ttv". - Flecal 1993 wn a very alleceaehl Yaer M enilM'a dnplh a w~ekelled ecawlny e1M ebwed aelse Oewm m tM awemlwket ma.ar. We eenwlated . alrccweN4 W Wty a- NxFq, dleerl weretlaw a e new mn8on aaeel• ha dletdbutlorl renter m Alloau, eM Cddllleed t0 Oepelld aw IN(O Nrod e1M 4111(rIMFMNOn CMdele ~l' OpenM18 Sr IIeM .tan meludms our Mst Mn atoroa m tM Sau1Mm CeNlemla market. s !'iunn~inl Hi,~ldiglds Our sew alul net income powN contkrue0 m Mcal 1991 Na aew for the year roxked 4x.x2 drawn, m klcrene a 9%orar t9a pda year. net kxwule a 946.3 mMNen mcroued 33%over wt yar'a 584.9 mgnon. Net Nlcerne per cerrulan aMn a 5186, enuta4 M ed419on.1 ak.rn wW m iar a 1993, wr w nx ealwered m wt ysn•. sL9s. orr. mwfkw mcnaed to xx.xeN m 3s93 mm x3.rrn m 3990. rolN a:• pemes w a pe2er4 a sew 4ecleeee4 h 18.96%Nan 39.08%. Net klearrM n a per cold a.awa Imroeeee to x.o9%cenipeled m L89N m eM pda y.ar. saw m cenper.ela atae. a tk. y..r maseea one parrld. > our eawa m new 3993 kr creeaed deaplt• 9re we.k.rr.d ecaiolrAc colgNlom xMhkl ow meMetkrS ene elul rare thNn` a our sloe apsnmp end cwhi8s. rte.wenmrket IMrtry ea(en upaMnek~{ . moderetbn a.alra etas aaln m tM /a6 a 3990 n hen a tlw OuM war and w.w.l. ult ecaromy en.cw caurmrer epwidMis. Cwtenwn noe aay wen 91pMig lees on Beck t4P h lM store ou! eMRed to IOWeI p0ee4 ProMlcb, Onpta itNae QOM1maN tnrlde, rr rrrrrrrwr ranarM akowad 9Nt ow CIU10111er cWlt ks m het CorllFllled to Blow aM our meAa eharo has not decrere0. We abo beroaed Mom the shm to loear- plked, pdvae label ttema whk:n Mrprored groan mapm. > 7M tknkrg a sta. open Ings era croskrge krrWCted our Bales growth. Wdrrg Mcd 1990, we clred 18 aMrr r we wrwMded our sun "re5itkr[' program. lloweaer, duMg Mca 1991. the opwringa a our 17 new oombpraMn hmd and drag centers prlmarpy occurted ABM{ the Ma hag a the par. We closed throe stores Oudry; flecal 1891> Fquifq Olfrrirf~ In luh we eoW an atldttMna 4,690,000 eheree a Clan B Conanal Stock a 998 pn snare M a auccwehrl prdpM olkdng. the net plot-<er a 5171 rrMNon were uaetl to rs duce autalarMig debt. 9narwe eapenaMn end Merore woAM[ capml. Wgh a4ulty a 5474 mlNnr eaueaMg 5076 a tote eaptta, we aro M a abwrg pasttbn to coaaan our ag8eaalra ezpsnaMn Purrs. s iLlAdionel Di<frihufinn Fnrilifirs 1991 maAea the hra rime ell a our aoroa were.ervad M our awn dbbladlar uaas. Prkr to 1991, me stores M the souttnrrt Fallon wen eyplNd M krdaparrdea wnob aebm. In Augrt, s new mpgm avuan hwt, hilly Mte~aed abtMUlbn canter M Tawan (PnoaMzl. Mtar. became hdh opemtlonW. iaa hclgty aho Mchan • rhdd mpk Ward end a bottled water plrR dararrBY, aN ttw ataroe M Ure 9orrtlrwsat Regbrr era ttre new star M capknrM an arrPPlled M tM. d4bibutlon facXlty.> wl6l Bw .deF Bon a the rolMaon teclgty, we now opera. mar 2.7 mllpnr poets rest a b.dnt.La abtdeutlan and Procanki( taolplNa. We bapeve the baebtage MtegraMn alien a Mt pottaa adraaagee M our canpetl0ve purcheshg urlroranad. Plot say d, the ataru reeeWe better suppow end servke, mrt thM sehllatdbutMn a8ows r to conOrwe oar ew errdaY Mw Ddce pro6ram end Mrgove propNbllky.> M ~~~ Min~kr'fr Oudrrg the year, we cawMrna our plaemd program a eaerMg new nrnkea and Mgwm- hig rnnka ann. M eaMMg nlerlreb. In 1981, we opened 17 new corrranetbn Mad era drug cernters areragNlg 77.000 aquero feet aM namdeb0 alz ahr stoma. In tea wa Imeaea a reeoa 52818 rnrpllon M capta ataeb Inchakq new atom, mrwdaa, aslrF tartlon era proaraMg hrclptln. s Our emry Mto the Saarem Capferrlls maAat wr tle M®rN~t a oa alas eapsnMn Program. OurMg the Wt lour mwdM a Mcel 1991, we opened nMe nom M tnb new am. We oenlary planrd thb entry char erMrNMg pn tendal mediate adlecerd to ow opsralhq area. Our ezpaelu arreeasa M nasna pen has Proven drat the npdmn carauner b lookkK /or newer. more reeporlse aterr. YYe bakwe Wr rnrriibkra0on foo0 and dnrg Banter lorrna wNl be B artccas M ttgs new mar ka. Slnu mae Deelde flue M Sou9em Callornda than all a ow aner aperahrg mike. camarred, h wXl he tle rrWa focus a our eaparbn plan tar Ors ua! aawBN y.«..> f7iaiJrrui. SNrsro oa Mldel pu08c ofhMg M 1989, we ane pNerd Nat dlNMlas Mw Mcnased seen yea. Brea u Ors sironL mab d Mca 1993, lM Bus a Olnaotera M Jnanq' 1992 Manretl the annuN dIVMNM tae hen 5.98 per oonranrorn ahem to 8.14 par can mon ahns.> o••,, ~. ¢r er. nr.,:n .~,en Oatlra~k . ~. ~~ ...,.; 1. ""''r' We look (award to the oppordmlUSS antl ctraOSKw of the cpnM{ year. We pW1 to open 14 to 18 new dares In Osca17902, krekelklL altlrt to tan new stone M SwIMm CaMlsmla. We wlp amWars to keep Our ataro W W date and Nwest M turdutaN hdlF tles. OePRM eapenddaes for Osca11992 are p~raed to s[aln saoee0 5200 rrd0lon, Wa WHI ebo comMUe as conmdhrlaR to eYeryday kM PdCear elularlral N(YILCr arld R spOnar~ to customer rMSM. Our 18,000 smpbyeu Me dsdleated t0 Smltk's arrCCMs arM Mae M tM rewaW of byal saNca arM OanPenY amwlk. iM0aQ1 dewilopM{ aw people arM makdakdrq modem, dtrac8re tecWOes; we wM skay{Wen our mnaMtment to our cudarrors Orin pmyMe a °clear oppommOY" fa ep our errlDlOyeea > ~~~~ le8rey P. Smkh Cfn,vnrnu nl rlv lonul nl i lrrJn~. anA r'hrrr I v. nnrr t Vh, n ,` Rbkad D. OmIM nrArnf an.l f-hrrr r llr.ef nr,Crrlryr r. Squnrr Frrt hu Stow Tigre u o,~a.ema ore i,...,..~~.,~ er m es so A key ebmerd to our suaneae b otlednp exh d our custamen fhe hay YroppkK expo- rune pwsibb. To provbe such en expederwe, ee have aarrrhmed aMroeOve, rrndan, respanive, .tare hNOtyes vddl aervksodwded errgloyeea, ererydey low prices arY e "OOlden flub" rorPorote pMloaoplry. > Shrre Fonnnt Our storos are carehOY pbnrwd, pealpneA end aperoted to ue Ore moat reapaWw to MarlQnd; wrlerarrer needs and dmropyOrk drancterbtles.5mflh's operates tluee type d Yo1e bmrNs. Our 92 a:mrblrwOm bad eN dnlQ Comers rYl(e b aKe haul 45,000 to 94,000 apace bet and afbr a corrrplete sebctlon d supemuukat, norOood end drug protlrrcts. TMSe slag. bolus rrro0ern, at4aeflve tryada with wide a'aM and bMnh M Obpiry'sparoa b 4cOtah eanvenbnt ahoppkrO, a varbly dapaelYty depad• nwda, and eerNaOod, h10dyautmrotW drechout facPhles. Our 14 supentap rorr(s m alas ham x0,000 to 4b,000 sprwe fad and horror 9u1 appeerulro d e Iw(e supemradcat whh a slpOOcart anlotmt d naOOOO arr0 Ora{ rrurcMrlMse added. OerreuOy our superstores have Isyver and mole tmNM apxblty dsPartrrreota then our rnrrrbhatlon atoms. Ow Ilaee earrventloeY Yorsa evea[e 22,T00 puao lest m sbe arM love iM ep peames d tMtbrW eupamrodbta.> Mast dam stores an apm 24 haaa a say erxl oiler aver so,ooo d9brent abed Orargs and pdvafe bhai prodrwis. Oa conrhhretlorr food erM Onq centers rapreaad Ow aleetop ehappirrO caraePt. A aatansr not onN can puchaae hom a wide..lec9on a bad erM nadwd rrwrchnaes, but can sh00 a valetY d specWty dspeMpnb krcyuderC phermx4es, dearataserr, hot pro pored faoh, hHtale Wkedse, vl0po depNblMnb, haal Yaps, Orrehallr phdo fhdahkr/. hdFaervke trerdu and Ctrkwse err0/a Mexkan takeout loads. A sb9ed crrstarrwr au~ vke couma located near the store enuwne open erutarrren aaabnnce ahh qusstbm a bCallrl(pmducla, purchumg tkkab br beN warn. caslir{ clrecW, purdwkr9 moray mbn and PaYkrY u1Rtty bRb. We abo PrOV~Oa fat ehschaut servleea vAN rorrv pdedred acwurers and courtesy clerks who hK ®oCelles and agar cnrYad sarvka.> tihrrr ~pprnruum We belbve our stoma aro atom/{ fhe moat modem stow m taMy'a aupsmnrkat InAo- try. Over 76 parcad d ou currerd square faoh9l IrM Assn newly cenahrretad a tofaAy ronradeled m the lest fhe years. 9Y conllnlralry svahrotlnO sash aeon's phy.bY carrdF tbn and eppeerarne, vre msuro Net mr Ymn ere rrndwn, ethectM, m `000 phyakY condfllon, and roapongve to comlxrror needs. > Phrrr Lrrrntinrr Our IrNrouee roN estate dapenmerrt ureNly aebcb Yore aha aMr enalyalry{ such feo- ton r Compedlion, eeeaasNYlry, tralhc pekerrn, aM poggetbn vvllhm tM propossO ores ket eroa.0ur9oel b to eefaMbh eM Uran mekOYn a stray{ mwket shoo m each Yae'a merkel aroa throvBr our evsryOay bW prklrl(t {xogerrl end agpudve markathr`.> Cmplnyrc~ Smlth'a cuwen9Y empbys ova 18,000 empbynss. Our caOhxlaO eueeen m tM supaa market Nrtlwtry Oepanda m our ahiBtY to attreGt end rofam co4eole, OsAceted employees to twtter sans our cuYamero. Much d an rocad suawa can 6e attrlbute0 to our loyal arm productive empbyees. 7hmugh their elrorts, we have bean able to attract and serve more satisfied customers each year. In rehm, we have worked to cuPoVate an excellent employee emlronmeM where people can excel. As an organkatien we are corn milled to halo ant deverop empbyees and promote from within.> We encourage each employee's entreprerreunal spark by evaluating and acitng upon their auggestkas ror Ira provemeM. Fmpleyees are periodkalry surveyed to obtain feedback on what we are ddng wNl arm wham we need to Improve. These surveys co11aM data on a variety d topke In- cluding customer service, work wrmHiars, compersMian, benefits, treimng, lob satlsfec- tlen, lob security, and relatknshiPS with other emproYeea arm aupervisore. Opponunklas are also provmee tar every employee to wbmk wggestkns to management through the "Smih's Idea Bank." Over the pee[ years. many Important programs and roliUec have been Implemented as a Direct reauH of ampbyee Input. Bmldea hngovarreMa In daydr daY operetkmn, empleYce kea9 have been Irotrementel In Impreving perskn benefits arm heaHh cam preglams, imgoving training, then®ng promotkn polkka, ant enMng kng checkout Ilnea. ow open chamrels of communkatron will never allew us to become cwn paceM. > We paY competBive salaries ant wages ant aRer outstanding bamflts. In ed dHlen, management at all kvek pertlcipffies In home programs based an prollb end performance. Last year an arrrolmt equal to appraximetery 30% of Income Oelore taxes was pall to our employees In the farm of bonuses.> We are alw proud M our very experF errced and motivnted manegenrerd team. Our twelve executive oMcers have been wkh Smih's kr an average of 13 yeas arm most have been In ttielr current poaHlon hu the last five years. This low turnover In our management team provides Smith's wHh a conaie- tent management phlksophy and a char Nskn M the tenure. > Our mercharmising program. Is based on everyday low ahek prices. Wa believe thla b the halrent program for our customere. Ta accomplleh everyday Imv pricing antl maintain aM1 equate marglrs, wa rely on sophistkmed buying systems, an active rorward 4uY pre®'am. tlgM Invemory contrds, arm strict control of operating expenses. > t, .i'JF'I iL„ i~~,i Smkh's corporeta phlloaophy lotuses an the treatment of three Important groups of poopk. We want to treat our customers. empoyees arm auppllers as wo aureeWea would Ilke m ha treated. TAIs phlbaophy prompin us to be comidarete A customer deeds arm desires. to attract, hold antl devNOp IoYaf employees ant to be honant arm rolr wkh our supplkrs. Continuing the partnerehlp wkh customers, ampbyeea ant aupplles will ba a key to our /uture success. > , ~ ~, -Ifr, ~ , I„ ,. I I „~, In order to maximize cuataner wrvlce, we have developed our own IMromo comumar rr ' warch department. This department coMlnuafty surveys customer attHudes and merkM shares of all supermarkets, Irrclutling SmHh'a, In axlnting as well ae proapeMlve market areas, We also actively smkk customer opinions In these mallet areas. The data ganerv ated hour thane survaya enables our management to resporm ro changing consumer rreeda, evaluate store locailana, arm atlluat aria target advertising based on apeekk cur tourer perceptions. > ~= :.y~l:.~'A:.~K ___ . .>;. ~~ ,~ ~ ~;~ .. -: ;=: ~~;r;: ~'~Yfifvs4y, y+~X" t // ._..._ ~~r...~~~w M. d ~ °~ ~ l a ~:~y ... .,,. Smkh's believes a high level of automation and computerization is essential to maintain ing and improving our competkiv¢ position. We rely on sophisticated computedzed data systems to provide meaningful Information to all levels M management. some of the In- novations curnMly In use i«lude inventory control and product movement systems, ac counting, labormwnagement scheduling systems, direct store delivery systems. pharmacy tlata banks entl buying systems.> EI«tronic scanning equipment In all our stores has simplified [he checkout pr«ess entl tl«reasetl [he amount of tlme required Por customer checkout. Atltlttionally, tms equip meM galhere useful IMOrmadon about movement of merchandise and volume M each prod«t sold. This data Is usetl to all«ale product space, plan labor schedules, evaluate the pmfitabllky of indivltlual products, and plan merohandbing programs, As a resuk, we are aUe to reduce labor coats, monkor the success of promotional programs, entl efiee lively manage the level M Inventory in each store. > Our stores also have separate. 1o- store computer systems whieb are networked Into the malMreme computer system at the corporate oMce and linked to the scanning equipment in checkout s[antls. Cur rently, this Instore system Is used by the pharmacy tlapartment to process presctlP lions, maintain requlretl IMorma[lon on each customer. and assist in the billing process br charges covered by participating medical plans. The video department uses this tom pater to process all video renYls entl account for the vltlao Inventory. Any retail pdce changes adglnating at the corporate office or from the centre) boyars are transferred eiedronlcally to the scanning equipment through the irretore computes Plus. Hem movement iMOrmetlon gathered by the scanning equipment is transmitt¢d through this instore computer to corporate headquarters for mrther analysis. A new merchandise re~ calving system for products delivered tlirectly to the stores expetlkes the receiving pro sass. controls paces parr br merchandise tlelNersd to the stares. entl retluces the amount of peperworN and labor requlretl to pr«ess invoices for payment. > The tllstrlbution centers have Installed separate computetlzetl systems tlesigned specifl~ tally to Increase warehouse and purchasing elgclency and reduce operating costs. Through these systems. our buyers receive timely IMorma[lon to make economical inven tory W rchases. Since the system provides detalletl Information an receiving and ship meats and related product I«ation, warehouse labor costs Dave been reduced. labor efficiency Is enhanced through the use of time stantlaMs fur warehouse tasks that are calculated and monkoretl by the system. Adtlklonally. the dlPerence between actual and standard time is osed for incentive wage computations. > Except br the tllsttlbmlon center and Instore computers, all computer pr«essing and programming Is pertormetl at corporate headquarters. The Management InmmrMlon sys tams department conslsLs of malnfiame and store programming teams, operators entl pr«esaing control personnel, communlcelinn specialists, report dletdbulion pesonnel, end system support speeialists. Face la Involvetl In the Durrett compuer system opera lions and Is detllcated to providing accurate entl timely reports to management. > Since the beginning 011985 through the end of 1990. Smkh's Implemented a strategy M phasing out smaller. older comemlonal stores and superstores and replacing them wHh larger comdnMlon food and dmg canters. As a resuk of this strategy, the total number of stores remalrred constant during that time period. However, the amwM of store square footage Ircreased how 2.920.000 to 5.580,000. an Increase of 91°6. We complMetl this ^reHtting" program in 1990. In 1991. our efforts wore focused on expert sbn into the SoMhem Callbmia market and further penetratbn Into the 0.rizona market. In totah we opened 17 food and drug combination centers tludng the Year. Including 9 stores in Sou[hem Calibmia and 6 stares in Arizona. These stores Increased the store squaw footage to 8.773,000 square teat at the erM of tae year. Addflionalty. we closed a small stow In Uteh, sold a combinMbn carter In Arizona and replaced a stare in New Mexico. > Through our afore davelapment program, we strive to build arM own our store locations, whenever possible. ConaequeMly, stow ekes era pumhasetl when economF catty kaalbb rather than kaaed, Cunartty. 82 M wr 109 operating stares have bean bulk try us on property we have ekher purchaeetl outdgM a leased an a long-term basis. The remaining 27 stores are leased how third partks. > Our fully IMeI:rMed real eatnte department is a key rector in the wccesa of our store devekrgnarrt program. The atalf consists M real estate rlegntlators. ecorlwnic reaeamh analysts, lawyers. archkacis, art gineers. arm censtmntien supervisors who kleMky potemial new afore locations, pun chase (or k necessary lease) the beat available store skes, plan and oversee stow constmc[lon, and manage atom remodels. > The primary focus in 1992 will be on adding new stores In the Calibmla market In 1992, we plan to open 14 to i6 new stores. Oi those new stores, a to 10 will be In Southern Calibmla. The remaining new stores will be In ezlsting markets. > sR { ~~ ~? .'. r Y', 4 . ' t ~y .: yr ~~ L ' ~ c ySYy fil .rvr.d :s. '`Y . '^v`,` . L 14 C < ~ .. ; i • i Yi.. ~ ' ,, ` f ~~ ,~. J~l ~ ''r' _~ ~. .~ ' + -s ~,.Y .,a t 1'~y~. s' i ~ .N t lX ~ ~ ~, ' . r~ ~ ~~ 5, ~29 ." lkY 35y, x-> :.. ~ s(, ~ . 4 ~ ' ,}-' ~ r ,, T „~ sot ~ ' ~~, ~ .,:mss: ~'>.. ~f~';~; (J t' ` "1 +~ ~. ,~µ,,~ . ~.. f .. ~ ~~~['~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ I t fl,, t rt. i•Pk /.~~ '~ ~ s.-~J .~~~~' Tl' . ,~.Afs b4 ~'~ •/ ~ ~~ ~ .I ?~i ~ ''S ~i°r~~ ", fi~ ;~ F Each store is supportetl by tlecemralketl operational management which enables us to ' more ellectively react to local market circumstances and gain competkiva advantages as local condkions change. However. certain accounting. real estato, legal and data pro- ceasing funetlons are eemralketl to retain the advantages of economies of xale. AddF banally, cerkral distribution tacilkies, backstage proeasaing plains, antl Invemory management provide support to the stores by: • Securing lower pdces through volume Wrchaxs of merchantlix. • Enhaiming gross margins and retlucing retail paces hom special buying oppartunKies, • Comrolling Inventory levels. maxlmKing Instock poakion and optimhing the use of store sheK space. • Reducing [rensporta[bn costs threugh effective managamerd of store shipmems. • Insuring ontime tlelivedos. ' Our 109 stores are located in eh'Jn weslem slates antl are tlfviOed Into three re®ons. The Imemmumaln Rel9on consists of 99 stores In Utah. Nevada. Idaho. and Wyoming. The Southwest Region corrolats of 41 stores in New Mexico. Arhone, antl Texas. The rlew CalKomia Region caulnffi of 9 stores. Each region is atafkd wIM operational man alters who function wkhln appmved budge4 constraints and objectives. The regional stab coMisffi of Oepertmerrt supervlxrs over meat, produce, bakery. Iwnloal, pharmacy, tlell ~~ ,,, ~ antl prepared lootls. Thex departmem supervisors assist dlstriM arm atom managers in malmalMng corporate staiMards arM implemerrting mercharWising programs. Our organ4 zation at all levels Is dedicated to cominually seeking batter ways to serve our custom ers. erM ofkr qualKy merchandix at everyday Inw pdces.> Central oRlces cooNlnate the hiring of empbyees by accepting applications antl contacting Interviews, pppllcaMs era prescreened according to atandar0 qualKles antl charectetlstics inclutling a tlesire to provide excellent customer service and potemlal to tre developed br higharaerel jobs. As a rnuK. we believe our empbyees always reflect SmNh's attNutle M contain ant ser Nce to our customers. t The regions are further dlNtled IMO tllstricta ranging from 9 to S6 stores oath. District antl atom managers are responsible far ali aspecffi of afore operatlpns Including oversee- ing local advertlsing bmreta, empbyee reletlarre ant tlevelopmem. customer reletlana. communky akalre ant obrer lurwrtlone relating to local operations. > i, ., As the number of Smith's stores grows. so does the need for krrowledgeable and capable employces. Our employees are continually trained In customer relations to maintain courteous and emclent urvlce. The Store Director Candldnte tmining progrem oBere six Intensive weeks d InstmMlon In total store management to future store directors. Can- dmates learn about store operations, accourrting. daW processing. personnel. ware house operatiore and receive hantlwn haining In vatlous store departments. Employees also receive training through Irvstore meetings and Insimction. videos antl seminars. A6 ditionally, we use a combined printed and video newsletter to communicate quartariy wtth our employees at all levels. > The Company operates central dlstribMlon facilities In flak lake Cky antl neamy Layton. I/tah arts Toleson, Arimna. Wtth the addklon d the Tdkfson Obtribullon center In 1991. all d our stores. Including our new stores In SouNem Calibmla, are aupplled by Com panygwced, fullyaMegretad dhtribMion cerden. q produce warehouse located In Call fomia helps ensure quality arts freshness by dealing dlrectty wkh produce grewere. Over 70% of the memharWlse sdtl by Smkh's Is haMmd by our distribution facilities. Tne bal. ante d products Is supplied by dlreM delhery from manufacturers and apeclaky whole- salers. We cumoMly operate 2,746,000 square feet M tllsMbutlcn faciliies. > The grocery distribution Comdex in Layton also includes a stMea}4hean hlgtMse ware house wkh a mllyautomMed inventory storage system to manage larger quantkles of mrv.•arkbuy Inventories wkh a mlrlmum d labor. > The Company operates several processing fadlltles to provme better support tar our stores arts atldkianal profit oppartunkles. Thex processing facilities atl~ln our diatdbu~ Lion centers located in Wyton arts Tolleson. Fach dlsMbMion center has a dairy process- ing plant thM processes a variety of milk, milk producb and fmk Wnches under 9mkh's private label. Tha automated hozen dough dent In laylon protluces numerous hozen fakery goads mr goal baking a<our Instore bakeries. The cukured dairy products plant in laylon supplies all Smkh's stores wkh private label yogurt, cottage cheese, scar cream, ant chip tllp products. Tha Ica cream processing plats In Layton supplies ell Smkh's stores wkh private label Ice cream. The bottled water plant In Toleson supplies the stores in the SoMhwest re~on with bottled water products. > __ .. ,~ M1 .~ h~f 7C,~i,{„ ~~ J~ ~_ ~m } ~ ;,,;_ _~ ;;: -. , kalping our smployain succeed 6trengthene Smkh'c commkment to our customers. > Smkh'e Pootl eta? Dmg Cerrtars presents a Clear Oppo; rooky br her6 warking, dadbatetl emPloyaea. In fact. we krtnty be Ileve this commkmem to our employees la a key to loadarshlp aiW Innovatlar, In the supermarket Industry and our abllky to compete In a tough entl dynamic marketplace. > We maNe every eilort to prvylde growth opportunklas to all Smkh1 empk:yeee at every level so our cuetomere can coum rm better, fetter, aM more re11aWo service. > Wkh more than 18.1100 arm ployeero and growing, we ero bRunate to have detl4 sated workers who take pd~ i In what tkey ao. > 7hb year's annual report highlights tM ceroers of only e bw at Smkh'e emdoyem who have taken advantage at this Clear Opportunity. > .., to pravltle camp; opportunkba br our peapN+, we moat commk ourselves to a sound, planned pakem of growth." > ..-~riv~ :~'".~:: :.Fy ~. ~~ v `~ 4 ' of ~M1. _ ?f. ~ hf`: / .• / / Y~a 'I~ V~ ~~ ~~ ~? `. ~. - `a., ~a * ~ ~ ~ `, ~ . ~,. ~s .v~_.~ Net Sales increased 9.2", in fists! 1991. 17.3'• in fiscal 1990. and 24 3". in fiscal 1989 comparM with [he re- spective Vdor fiscal years. During this period. square foot age br ail stores increased ¢0 5.773.000 square feet m the end of fiscal 1991(109 stares) hum 5,SR0.000 squaw feet M the end of fiscal 1390 (95 stores) and 5.235.000 square feet at the end of Hscal 19R9 (98 stored, reP.acting the Company's efforts to close smaller conventional and superstores arM to consolidate market coverage wkh fewer but larger combination Ipod and drug c^.nters. New stores increased net sales by 8.1^: in Hscal 1992. 10.4"^ In fiscal 1990, and 13.7b in fiscal 1989. Same store sales In<reasetl 1.1"., in fiscal 1991. 6.9"o in fiscal 1990, antl 10.6°'~~ in Hsca11989 compared with the respective pdor fiscal years. The inmeases In same store sales were ganera[etl ax new stares opened in recent yeare rontinucd to mature in Ihelr markets antl as volume increased as a result of the Company's everyday low price policy, The CospanY attribirtes the slowing In the rate ni Increase in sans store sales to various factors Including the moderation M inflation. Increased compatklon in verb nus markets and the general economic downturn. > Gross mmgdns dudng fiscal 1991, 1990. and 1989 were 22.26"'„ 21.77 ~•. and 21.76".. respectively. The Improve. merits in gross margins ware due to Ne brther maturing of new and Existing marketing areas as well as a shirt in product mix to higher margin products in the, Company's larger combination stores and In specblty tlepaHments. Also, atlaKloaal dlstribullon Udlitles antl continuing Im- provements In backstage. eificlendes Improved gross mar gins. > The Company anticipates that new stores recently opened antl Manned in the Callbmla market will apply pressure rw Its gross margins until the stare= become es tablishad In their markets. When the Company cote.? u new market area. k actively prMnMes Its everyday low price pnficy In wdor fi estabish antl then maintain a mar knt share In the area adequate to provide anticlpatnA ecanomias of scale. CompEIKIVe responses to this met chandlsinp, strategy heyuently put pressure on a new store's gross margins dudng lha Initial phases M market entry. In November J.909, rho Company en<arad the Phoe~ nix. A~ixona market. In Reptembsr 1991. the Company on teretl the 6outhmn Calibmia market. Operating, selling antl administrative erprnses decreasetl as a percentage of net sales to 15.53°.~ in fiscal 1991 ham 15.944• in fiscal 1990 antl 16.05"; dudng liscai 1989, TCese decreases resulted ham economies n( scale ripe to intrea52tl SaICS v01WTE WhIC118praatl f1Sed GOS(5 aver a larger salts base. > Oeprxdatian antl amoetir.-dlon expenses increasetl by' 573 million during fisca11391. 97.2 mllllon during fiscal 1990, and 56.0 mllllon dudng fiscal 1989 over the re sportive pdor fiscal years due to Ue conslmctinn of larger combination cemers and the atltlkion of new Aistri. !adion and processing bcllkles, > Interest exVense increased 18.5"., in fiscal 1991 corm paretl wkh fiscal 1990 as n esua of net inoteases in aver age !ong~term debt tar each peAotl. Howevee, the increase was offset in par•, by a reduction of debt hem the pro- ceetls of fhe Company's public oHerng in July 1991. The tlecrease of 2.6". in fisca~1990 compared with fiscal 1989 was caused bV a reducBOn of revolnng credit bank loans from the prococds of the Compary's Inkial public of- frdng in tune 1989. > Inrnma axes as a percentage nt income bebre Income taxes were 38.6"~. in fiscal 1991 antl apVroximately 3Fn in Oscal 1990 antl 1989. The Increase in Pisca11991 was tlue primarily to the Company's increasetl presence in ma n kets recently en:ared which have higher state tax rates. ~ As the Company enters new markets, net income mry be nega[hely affected by normal slaH~up costs assodated with new store openings antl as a resuk of the Cpmpacy aggressively pursuing Hs everyday bw price policy In ordm to establish market shares sufficient in reach net sales volume atleyuate to effect anticipated economies of scale. Management believes that net Income In fiscal 1992 may come under pressure with Me Company's entry Into so lected mallets In 9oNhem Callbmla. The Company opened nine comMnatlon stores in cheep markets dudng L~F,- ZTU..~'~~'+'~.,4 /~ t r: 35 ',i ~Y. '..Y~~ ~~f ~ ~'~" '~ya"5R ~i $!Gg 1dt'i_ y (~'~,jj~~j{~}I~~~~, ..,v... .s34 ?~r7~;. avay. nt-.I~f „L .CL the last two quarters of fiscal 1991 anA plans to expand ks market penetration In Somhem Califomla by constmc4 ing atltlklonal storm. Net income may also be allected by the relatively higher real estate. operating and selling ex~ penses typically -'-""iMed wkh stores Ir, the Southern Calibmia market. akhough th!s may be offset to some de grec. decentling upon competitive condkbns. by the gen erally higher gross margins expected in that market. > Cash ant cash equlvalerrts decreased 52.8 million during Aval 1991 primarily m a resuk of cmh management et. bks and normal cash activkles. Working capkal was 530.7 mllilon .at December 28, 1991, an Increase of 536.2 mllilon compared to the prior year. At December 29, 1990, curteM IlaMlkles exceedetl currem meets by 55.9 mlllian. The Company's cunent ratio at the end of fiscal 1491 wet 1.1:1 comparetl to .98:1 at the antl of As- cal 1990. The Increase In working capkal resukatl from the proceetls of the public ofM1ering in July 1991 and the Irv crease in backstage inventories. Working capkal Is fur they supplemental by unused revolving credit Imes. which were 542 million at December 28, 1991. > Cmh prevld¢0 by operating actbkles amounted to 5619 million and 5107.7 million for Hsca11991 and 1990, respectively. These fluc<uatlore were mainly caused by Increases in 1o- vcntory balances nRset by Increaws In supplier accounts paYabie. The Company maintains significant levels of lo- ventory to support Hs hlgM1volumu, lowydca memhandls Ing sbategy. During fleca11991. Inventories Increased 580.8 million to $190.4 milllor. m the end of Ascal 1991 comparetl [o an Increase of e26.0 mllilon In flsca1199G. These Increases In Inventories were caused mainly by warehouse and store expanslan. > Cash used by Investing activities was 5277.4 tnlllinn for Hsca11991 and 5159.0 miPlon for ^scal 1990. The Compan}' antlclpates expenG Ing ePVroxlmately $200 million tludng fiscal 1992 for the development antl construction of new footl sod drag coo- tare, remodeling of existing stores, and replacing equip inert .Cosh provided by financing actlvkles totaled 5212.6 mllilon for fiscal 1991 antl 563.8 mllilon br fiscal 1990. On July, 36. 1991, me Company soN 4,690.0(10 shares of Class S Common Stock at S3B per share In » suecessml public aRering, realking net proceeds to the G>mpasy of aPproximatsly 5171 million. The net pro ceetls from the ofledng were used to [educe Intlemednem nutstanding under the banN nedk agreements, flnarwe expansbn protects end Increase working capkal. Duar- tedy cash dlvltlends have been paid on the Class A ant Claws B Common Stock. a The Company hbtaHcally hew Onanced now Companycwned stores antl tllstHbmbn fa clll!les through bortowings, typically secured by the prep- ertles. At December 26. 1991 and December 29,1990, the Company had oufstanding 5395.0 milllan and 5342.6 mllilon, respectively, of longterm mortgage debt, pdncN pally bonowetl from Insurance companbe aril other InstN rational lenders. The Company has rat expariancetl tlHACUky In omalning mortgage financing at setlaha:tory Interest rates. ManagemerH Alarm to Manca hkuro atom development throu®r secured antl unsecured bngdemt dam. > Manegemem believes that the Atranclal resources avellable to k, Including amouMa avallabb under existing bank Imes m credk amt Imamalty genermed IurMa, will be suMCIeM to meet planned capkal axponslon antl working capkal requirements Including dam seMCing roquire meets resuking /rom addttlonal borrowings. fie Company may, however, use addkional sources of brtds (or such purpnsea. Including the Issuance of dam m equky seeurt ties and leasing rather then owning bulidl,sgs end equip men[. > In December 1990, the Flnanolel Accounting 62antlams board t Fg56! Issued Stntemem of Flnanclal Accouning Standards Ne. 106, °Emplayoni Accauming Mr Pmtretirement Benelka Other than Pambne." Tire Company currently does not oAar any poatretlremem txsn elks other than pensions to rte amploYaea. The edoptlon of Strtement 106 has no ellect an the Company's con solitl#etl flnnnclal etatemente. > 1,_ In recent years, fAe impart nl inflation on the Company's operating reeulta has boon mutlorete, reflecting lower rotas of Inflaion In the economy garrerally. Management does nnl believe that the Company will be adversely ap fectM by any slgnlACant M1kum Inflation due to the large number o/ Compenyrowned atorea. whkh tlo trot havo con tingant or valume~relatad rental ebngatlone. Whlk Infln tlon has not had, and the Company does not expect H to have, a matodal Impact upon opereting roauka. [hero la no assurance that the Company's business will not be art femetl by IMlation In the /arms. > i~rnifff~,~, Nat ales 52217,437 $2,031,373 $1,731559 Cost of good se14 - -- --~J 1723,848 - 1589,056 1394,743 493,589 442,3]8 378,616 Expenses: Operatin8, sDlll~ aM adminhtrttive 344.363 323,792 277,988 Depreclatbn anO amortlratbn 45.610 38,217 31009 Interest 30,319 25,595 26.290 420,192 387,804 335,285 Income belOre Income taxes -- 73,397 54.71A 41531 Income taxes 28,300 20,4W 15,100 Nei Income S 45,097 S 34,314 S 28,131 Net Mcome per ehere a Common Stock 9 185 5 138 S L38 L~mtth~, L:... CURRENT ASSEfS Cash and Cash e4uivalents $ 14,394 $ 17,157 Rebates and accoums recelvaWe 15,074 15.301 InveModes 290,427 209,631 PrepaNl expenses arM deposHS 3.855 3,611 Total curtem assets 323,750 245,700 PROPERTY qND EQUIPMENT land 186,872 ]34,464 BuIldMgs 4%.653 327,705 leasehoNl Improvements 26,046 26,297 Flxtures and equipment 358.457 262,380 1,025.026 770,846 Less allowances for OepreclatNm and amorthalNm 183,678 133,334 863,350 637,312 OTRER .455EF5 11,569 8,704 CURRENT LIABILITIES Trade accoums payable $ 180,393 $162,332 Accmad eaNra arN other taxes 30,842 28,307 accrues payroll aM rclaled oene/its 60,982 43,159 Curtem maturitlas of Iwig-term sebt 19,817 18,378 Currem matumbs of Retleemade Preferred StocN 1,046 1,048 Total cmrem IIaWINNro 293.070 261,220 LONGTERM DEBT, lase curtam matumNn 375,832 328,190 DEFERRED INCOME TA%E$ 46,200 37,700 REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCN, lees current malur9ks 7,401 8,448 COMMON STOCNMOLDERS' EQUITY Convertl0le Class A Common Stock (shares outateMing, 14,160.430 In 1991 am115,843, 784 In 1390) 141 158 clash 9 Common 6tocN (shares outstanding. 15,801,581 In 1991 antl 9,428,247 In 1990) 158 94 4tldNlonal pelbin capkal 266,44q 114,419 Retelrred aemings 188,643 153,498 474,386 288,158 $1,198,889 $891,718 CiminlidnfreiShl~lelm•rltso(CmnnumShriklwl~iec~''[-:qu)tq SmithA Bde~Ke et January 11999 19.406.999 s 194 $ 8.45? 5103,239 5111.886 Net Nkwme ka 1989 28,131 28.131 4c4uleltbn d CWSe l1 Common Stack (108,888) (1) (31) (593) (625) beuence d Clan B Commas Stock 5,975,000 $ 59 105,997 108.066 Tranehas d shams ham Clan Ato ClmaB (1.958,484) (20) 1,956.484 20 Ceeh alvMnge-$.10 per ehw. (2,527) (2.527) Balance rt Dacember 30.1989 17,340,527 173 7,931g8q 79 114,41.8 128,250 240,920 Net Frtame /or 1990 34.314 34,314 7ralnfery d aheree fiom Claea A to Ckw 8 (1,498,793) lis) 1,499,783 16 Cash dMBerMa-$.28 per shale (7,078) (7,078) Balenae at December 29.1990 15.843,784 158 9.428.247 94 114,418 153.488 288,158 Net Income Jar 1981 45,097 46,097 lefuwrx d clans B canmm stock a,s90,000 47 17o,s1o vo,9s7 Tmmbn d shares Irom Claw A to Clan B (1.883,334) (17) 1883,334 17 CaM dlN4erMe - 8.36 per ahem (9.942) 18,942) other u6 us Bdsrree at December 28,1991 U,160,430 9141 15,81/1081 5158 $286.444 8188,843 5474,388 ,~milh opl3unrtc acTmrles Net Income 545.097 534,314 $28.]31 AdluaOnanb ro rocmrclb rot kiceme to net oath provided In opereOrrQ actlvNles: Depreclatlon aria rmnlratbn IbclutlM6 anauntt clrar8ed to cmt d ¢mdt add) 50,495 40,577 32,785 oerenna Irwome wet e, 600 z9oa s.soo other z19 Ch.r~a b opernth~ eawb ma IIS08Mn: ReOelee and sccaurM recelvakb 227 (3,324) (1.~7) Inverdodea (80.798) (27.981) (30.137) prePaMl aapemw ana aepotlb (214) (1,024) 187 Trade aecounb paya0b 18,051 38,712 25.043 Attroea aab4 ane dMr wee 2.635 8.115 2,818 Acmued payroll sM rotated Eeneett 17,823 17,437 8.477 catn provbed M operotirq eetlvMle. 83,909 107,746 89,817 wve9nn9 AcTlvmt:s AM9tlamropropeny and equgarrom (251.550) (193,673) (148,289) prorroe0t hom aeb d ProlreAY and equipment 7,027 17,329 3,d32 Omer (2.885) 12.500) 836 CaM Used In bvestlrrg ectlvftba (277,418) 1189,094) (144.239) FlHMICINO ACnV1TIE9 Addkbm ro brrB-term asbt 77,007 95,990 84,240 peymenb on brr8~term MUt (24,324) (24,084) 199,309) Redemptlgad Pre/arrod Stack (1,047) (1.994) (920) AcgdtRlaria d Clan A cwrmron Stock (825) Prxeab frarn saN d Clan 9 Common Stock 170,887 108,058 paymam dNNOenM ~--- (9,942) -_ (7,078) (2,627) CsA proylded by Bnancbg ac6aNlee 2]2,751 83,758 77,918 Nel Incrsae (aeeroae) b cmh erM cuh equNabda (2.783) 2,468 3,494 Cqh end cmh equNnbme a< Oedmb{ d year 37,157 14,Bp9 11,205 Cath arM cuh e4uMbmt at end d year S 14,394 617,157 S 14,889 ~~ ~, . ~ ~ ~~, xi.rrn:. ~, n.,n .i.,r~~;, ~,~ ~:(7"I !~ 1 -'-i,;ruh~ uril,ln runt nr; Pnh; Ir. Tire eonsdldaled flnerrelet strierwrka Include the weourrta d SmIM's Food 8 Drug Caden, Ica. aM ks vrhdyowrbd suMWladee (ihe CompanY), attar the e0minribn d al®rflbenl IderoanpaY tmmaeflau eM accouma. The CwrpanY operetm a rogbnal supennarkd chain M tta Imembudaln, SeuthWeatem, aM Soulhem CalNOmla roglwa d itro Unketl Strim.> Tha Company's flxel year eMa a the SatwdaY rrearest to Dewmar 3L F1acN Yoar WarotkK result irmhrtle 51 Weeks for ewh year. Cash arM cash equNebnts cornbt d rash Arid aherbterm bvafinenU wkh rrlateMbs bo tAM three mantle. > Retail nrorchandlee Invenlgba d 5141.8 mulbn M 199Y arrd 5114.7 mmbn b 1990 are stated ri the haver d cat or madtel using the retell rrMDgd. Werdiwse inverrlMla d 5147.8 mNNon In 1991 and 594.9 mNNan M 1990 aro stated ri the buret d flratan, flrtad cost a nraalel > Property eM equlpmerd era stated M wet. DaPrwbllon an0 amattratlan are provided by iM •trelOtHkie meltrod basso upon estimated usefW Ilya. Iniprovenbrds to based property era errlafthed aver their estlmated uaeld Nva a the rerrrolNrg terms d ikelr reapedNe leases, vNleMver b ahener. > Costa IncurreO b coraroctbn rvlth eke opening d rrow atoms end abtddabn twHMa art expensed a Incurred. Tka re- mdnirg wt grvestmela In riorea cased, boa sdvege value, b charged agaNrt eamMrgs b lfre peaad d closhK and. br leased afore, a govWw Is melt fw the romddrrg leas IlobNky, nri d expaded srrbbaae read. > Iderest cmts ere azpemed as Iwurred, except for Iderest cafe whkh have keen capXMlxed a Wrt d tM wet d prepeabs carder develolmront, The CompanY'a rash peymMta for haero.t (net d ceDltd4ed Irdareat d approxFnmely 59.0 mllibn in 1991, 54.8 mllNon In 1990, end 53.1 mflNw In 1989) emourrted to 527.9 mlllbn b 1991, 523.1 migbn In 1990, end 526.4 mUNon In 1999. > The CampanY ddermlma ka ddened ta% IbtNNtlea timed w aMeremmaa betaroen the flnariclal repoakrg and fu peals d Ha asset and Iladlkka using to ta% rates Mri rAX be In e8ad sultan the dmaronces ere whe0ubd to royerse. r Net inwma per share d Cammw Siwk b rampded kY dhMHrrg the rrt Income by the vrelQrted average number d shares d Common Stwk odstarMbg d 27,397,9731n 1991, 28,272,011 b 1990 slid 22,479,2811n 1989. Common Stock equivebms In the loan d ctwk optba do not have a material dllutNe etbct w Me net hroane pm share cotta lotion erld aro excluded hom lke caaulrian. > TI10 Company la a party to arWn legal wtlona adNng out d tlro ordNwn couroe d Its huskroae. k5arragernerrt OeNevm that now d these ac0ons, hrdlvbualry or In lke egpagata, wIN have a meteael adverse efleat w tke Comprry'a rs sake of operribns or flnenclsl posltlon. > ~NokcwtoCmnnli~lntcdFimallrinlStntrrnctitslt~mtirrm'ral ~~~ 'Smith's \; rll i~~., ,t,tr7u.va,'i~gwprrrrn! The CanpenY depreciates 1te WlMirrgs ova 25 to 30 years and Ib flxturoa and equlpnaart over a perbd d 2 to a yeah an0 amortizes Its kaeehold hnpravemerrts over their eatlmeted ueeNl Nvas or the IMe d Ore lase. whkhever b shorter. Property aM equlpnaart ~rubts d the /ollmNrrg: 1991 Land 9 106,672 9180.872 Buildings 455,853 S 4b,3% 410.465 511.312 leasehdd Improvemerrts 26,046 5,371 20,675 1,553 Flxturea aM egWDnrort ----~-.~----- - 3%.457 112,819 243,538 37.630 53,025,028 8183.878 b%1,350 950,49b 3990 land 8 134.484 9134,464 Buidings 327,705 934,482 293,223 S 8.612 Leaeelrsld hnprovemeds 28,297 5,560 20,737 2,058 Flxturea and equipment .___ _._.--_.._..__.--._ 282,160 91.292 188.8% 30,009 5 770,848 5133,334 9837,312 540,577 Long-term deDS corniets d the lolbwing: Mortgage dotes, eoilateralixed M property arM equipment with a coat d .. .. .... _ _ _. _. 54910 mlllbn In 1991 aM 3399.2 mlllkm In 1990, payebb b monlhh Irretellmerda d 93.5 million In 1991 arrd 19901ndudhlg Irtermt rt an average rated 9.99% In 1991 end 10.22% In 1990 5387,052 5312,385 Indurtdal revenue borlde, couaterelhetl by property arM equpment wiN a cost d 538.8 miflbn In 1991 aM 1990, peyabb In varykrg annual hatMNnenb whkh decrease ham 51,030,000 In 1992 to 5773,500 In 19%, plus Irlteroet rt an everoge rete d 9.30% In 1991 aM 9.27% In 1990 10.848 11,803 RevoMng credR bank bane 33,000 19,000 Omer 4,749 3,598 395,449 342,588 leas curtart mrturlfles 19,617 18,378 4375,832 5328,190 S~Qith?~1 V07F. C - lr.r~.~.,,,rrrr f kh' : rr: mdr,i Interest on the revoMng credN bank bars b based on famdea wMch mutt In retee tlrd are Semrdty lower Man Me pMle rate. The agreamams are revbwed armudy vriM Vre ban W, a< whkh tkna the date each {nstalNlwrn b duo b garenlly asteMed one Year. At December 28,1991, tlb Company had unused Ihws q credit related to unsecured r> vdNrrB credit bank bans d 542 mINMa1. MaMritba d the Compeny'a brrg-farm Debt Ia the Ma Mcel years eutteaMrC OeMrnber 28, 1991 ere appmaNnatey 519.8 milNOn In 1992, 522.0 millbn In 1993, 524.7 mINNm b 1999. $27.7 m8 Nan M 1995, aM $30.0 mlNbn in 1996. ~ NOTF, i~ ~ ~rJ~ ~ n;ahd Prr'i~rrcd St. irk The CompenY has 85,000,000 shares d 5,01 pa share par vaba Pra/ened Stock eulhorbed, The Company has deulS~ rated 34,524.579 d tlwse shares ae Serbs I Preferred Stock. d vvlrleh 25,340,888 ahsrea srW 28.482.588 shares was hared arM aubtanOkrC In 1991 antl 1990, respedlvey. The Preferred Stock has rro dlvWaM re4uhemenl. s AN Mersa q the Company's Serbs 1 Prererted StacN ere subtect to redanptNw at arry thne d tib oplbn d 111e Board d Dkectas, Nt such numbma m the Board may determbre, arM al a redargtlon prke d 5.331/3 Da share, 7M xhsA ubd redemplbm q tta Company's fledeemebb Prehrred Stock aro eppresimetay 510 mNNon each year ugil eN orristardkr8 eherea ae redeemed. Upon INryldetbn d Ure Company, each share d Series 1 Preened Stock b edale0 to a Ilquldstlan prebrenoe d 5.331/3, on a Pro rah Wsb wIM any athsr sodas d Prehrred Stack, before erry dlshk bntlan to the hokbn d Clara A Carxrrm Stock a Cbas B Corrmrart Slosh. Each Shre d Series I ProlareO Stoch b errMbd to ten vdea par share. fledeemaMe Serlea I Prelened Stock b stated el nkbmptlm vabe b the CarnoNOaletl Balance Sheets. > NOTI 1 ,~.~~, ~iurldn~~' Cquihi ilw vdbg pmren, preterentte and reietlve ri~rta d Clan A Camron Stock and Class B Corrmron Stock are Identical M ON reapeeb, eacept the the holden d Class A Cornrron Stock have ten votes Der share and the holden d Coss B Cannon Stock have orre vda Ikr drare. Fach ahara d Clew A Common Stack b conrertlhb at any flaw at Ore optNm d the bower Imo one share d Class B Commcrr Stock. The Canpeny's CertlNcate q IrrcorpooDOn also proNdes that each ahero d Clew A Common Stock will be converted eulornnticdry brio one when d Cbsa B Common Stack N d eaY tkna the narrow d shares d Chas A Caarron Stook issued and aulstandbL ahaX be boa Men 2.910,885. Future seNn a trerw/en d lee Comparry'e Cirna A Cornnron Stock are restricted to the Company a bunedlsle tarnllY mom boa d the oriNkral Cbse A Cararpn StockhoNbn unbar Nrst preseMeO to the Company for convenbn Imo an WuM number d Class B Common Stock sAarea. iha Class B Canmon Stack hoe rw wrrverslan ri~M. At OecemOer 28, 1991, there were 20.000,000 sllarea d 5.D1 per Mare pa vMn Cbas A Canman Stack aM 100,000.000 sparse d 5.01 Der share per value Cbes B Commm Stock adhorized. >• Srti;Iti;y~ '~;~%7 F' 4 - in,nnir Tarr; InrorlM fez ezperue cerwieb of fire lellewb~ CWrenl: ____. ._ ......_...__..._-_- iederW 6fete 517,050 516,306 2,750 2,195 ,y: 5 7,787 tf+a 19,800 17.500 &900 DebweO: Federal 7,067 2,838 B,OSO Sbte 1,443 287 460 528.300 820.400 816,100 Cah Mebesenr18e fer bwane texas wero 829A nrMion 61991, 812.6 nABm In 1890, snd E7.8 ni111on ti 1899. > ilre dttNrerres between brcerrw tex experr ~d tlM tax cerrreeted by app17bi8 tlw sbtu[ory brssrrra fax rags m IIICpIN Eelela IIIL'Ollle fLIM Y M ID9pM1: Y,.Yi v. _ _ bhtutory tedenl blcOrrre tU Iale 34.0% 34.0% 94.0% 6tete brcenMl tex rote, net q /ederd blxerrle tax sliest 4.1 2A 2.8 lob to cndlb (.5) L41 1.61 Otirsr .8 .8 .7 38.b% 37.3% 37.1% 7be cemparsnb of dsMred hreolrre fez expense Mek 9er11 Ule te9ewbq IOerls: ,~~~, vv.,„ ~.~ ~,. ,, ., pn,~ .,,y _ .._.___ ~opu OspleelNisn 510,732 58,066 Se,f.96 Reserve Maslfbnunncs (1,191) (2.169) (712) Reserve fa cbNed store expsmn (789) (2,950) Ottew (279) (6b) (968) 8 9,600 52,800 58,600 ~s~~1h;5 \T tTl~ l; - L~ity°~ rrr:d Crmm~hnrnls the Oaryany beaee aapsrty srd erllYlmrart carder terms rd8dr halude, b Bane razaa, renews optlau, eseabtbn CI81~be a C«IINIgl11( MnnS Mdclr Me nezed M BUGS. 7oW rose 8%pbYe tOf eYal bBdei 81110Yn{!Ir b trle Ar9owhrg Mbhnum roaelz 515,650 $14,389 59,321 Conthrgent ronfae L041 532 528 16,691 14,901 9,847 foes sublease Waal Income 4,706 4,880 2,531 S]1,988 530,2u 57.318 Al Oaamrber 28, 399E hOnro rnYrhnun roaN mrroNNrenb end arrbleeze r«da hrwrra hn all rmrrcarcaabb bees v4tlr h4Ba « rarrrenp temu a are year « more amabted a Be IaMOwlne ,. „~r: _~ N~mi `:d e,yl 1992 519,147 S 8,160 511,993 1993 20,845 8,238 14,209 1984 20,718 8,173 14,645 1996 20,822 8,152 14,870 1990 20,711 8,114 14,897 1997-2003 99,894 27,738 72,886 zaox-2006 eo,uo ss,sas 7o.7os 2007-2011 73,708 8,008 85,702 2012@018 41,741 1,766 39,988 7lreroeR« _------^-__- 12,745 12,745 5418,141 587,333 5331,808 At OecerrrAsr 28, 1991, the Canpeny hW axdmct rwraabnans a epprozennely 520.8 rrYAbr to Adun wrubuctkrr. ~ ,V(YP! 11~ Pru.rm flnrrv F,rnplayeu whose terror d arrrpleymwd ere detemrhMd by ne{o8atlarm wltlr r4C0t514e4 C411eatlYe ber[ahrhlg Yale are eovered M theN rospacBro naBBenrployer pemlon parrs to wbk0 tM Conpmy amlMaes. 76e awb eher(ad to ap eralbm far Braze phew arrwrane0 to approztmetay SLB mlXlarr b 3991, 52.1 mlWar hr 1898, aM 82,4 mlMzn b 1989.Otlw hlbmrMlar Aor throe nrultVerrrployer phas b not avellatle to the Campary. TM Oorrr9enY mNnWra a tla mad bernM Perrzlon aen for e8 aA« pennenant, h4Ftlnn employees arhkh Provldee for name) rotlronraB n age Bs. Fmployeu ero al®ae to loln wiron ttsy campbte n but one year a servke and have retched aje 2L The bare8ta Nofrs Ya CBr1arlirlnha{ Fininrcial5tnfelru7rGa ltui~tdraled) ~ ~rnilh;g~ are based oh years of serrke erM stated anaunls aaeoclated with those years of eervke. The OotnPanY'a hxldng polkY k to caddlxrte annualry the enroum that may he deducted for federal hreome tax purposes. Net pedodk pemkn cost Includes the /olbwhrg componome: Servke cast - pt6aenl value of benefits _ earned tludng the period 51,364 51,382 5988 Irdermt cost on protected lx3rreM odlpetkn 77fi 506 303 Actual return an plan assets (1,170) I7 (540) Net amortlxetlon eM deferrel 310 _ 1588) (451 51,280 91.318 5646 The /dbwing tads Reseed tlq plan's landed statw and amoums reea~rbetl M the Campsnq'a cattrs!`aeetetl sheets: balance actuedN present value M accumulated UBrreBts based on service rerxlered to date: Vested $ 7,736 $ 5,262 Nonveated _._-.__-. ______.-._.-_- _- -~- 2,803 _.._____-- 1,656 30,339 6,918 Plan assets at (air valve (pmnadly in equity aM fixed Irwerrre /undo, and real mtalal 10,011 7,987 Fair value of den assets Ile excess d) lea than protected benefit odlga0on 328 (1,049) Unrecognbed rret kss hum past expeAence dl8erom hum that assumed and efTect+ d changes in aewmdlare (2.299) 11,384) Plot aervkc cmt rret yet recognbe0 m rret perbdk penskn cmt 1243) (271) Unrecoprlma net aa~et 1,630 1,793 Not prepeM perrsbi axparde 9 583 5 911 The welded averega dlscourd rate used to determine the actuedal prerem value af!Ae pretected Oerieflt odl Qatbn was 8.5% m 1991 errtl 9.0% m 1990. lha expected longdetm rate M return on plan eased was 9.5%fa eec11 year pre serried. > `` mith'y The ComPaaY has a Stock OPOon Plan whkh au0wd[ea the CorriPeneatlon Canmttlee d tlro Beard q DlRCtors to grant aptkap to key empbyem hx the purchase d up to an eggrappte d 12 ml0bn shares d Clan a Connion Stock. The op8ons may !b ehher Irwenthro stock optbm a rranpuall0ed stock optlwre. Stock optkan greded to key employees aM optlare uutstemling are es Idlows: Graded lone 211989 519.00 822,000 Forfokea ~ 19.00_ - 115,000} enlance d December 30, 1989 19.00 907,000 Gfarrted 19.00 54.000 For/eltad i `.- 19.00 - (18,0001 Balance M December 29, 1990 19.00 813,000 Grarded 19.00 191,000 Forbhed ^` 19.00 ~ I~.t~l Balance al Oecenrber Z0, 1991 919.00 938,000 The optlau 6ecomo eserehabk as fo9owe: Jane 21, 1993 30,000 Jurre 211995 30,000 lumf 211999 667,IXq March 12000 30.000 lamre7 1, 2001 _____-_ _____«___ --- 191000 _ 938,000 Canpeaae0on eapeme for the dkhrerrce between Ure market vagre d the optlmp on the gtarr[ date an4 the great price h elnertbBd on a etrtlghtilne Dania over the I8e d the optlona.lhe emoud che0(e0 to OpeteOoN Nr 1991 erld 1990 was knmatedd.>- RcrfxruY of Iu(ltr~knlett'llt tlialihn~s KesE;vilsibilit'y, filr FinhlllirilRgxutiuti Ii.xn~J n' Uvrrlnr~ and Sh~rkhnlrlrr< ,,. crrrith'< Axd b Drry, G~nhr=, Irrr. We nave evened the ecrnnpanying cerweNdatee Glance sheets a Smlth's rood 8 Drag tartars. Inc. and aulwid mrbs m d DerxmGr 28, 1991 arrtl Deranrba 29,1990, arrd tla nmtad corudtle[ed atatemarts a Income. rnrrt mon atocklwlden' agony. and rash gown br each d the three Ibeat teen in tl,e peded anted December 2& 39917heee Mancw stMerrunta ero the naparublgty d iG tonNenY's mauganerrL. Our rnpommNly b to ex- press an opmmn on these MandN eGternerrb Geed an our audits. > We cenductea e« ardlta in acwraama wltA 1[enaranY eecepted srdltarg arardarW. 7lraee staMrds npdn iha we plan arM peAOnn the audit to obtakr tea sareble aaearanee abo1R wlretlrer tG grrerrelal aGta moms ere bee a instals mlesratelrrent M ndlt Includes ezamkmrg, on a test Gsls. evMaww suppMk+g the arrrpnrrts ant dbcbnrM m tG IY1arICW rtafarnenta. M audit also Includes assessing tG acceurrting pda clples used and e1p111ksa eatlmetn made by mange mein, ®waA m evaWathrg Ore aaaaR INrerrclel statement pnaemdbn. We begeve tsar ow eudN pm Nde a roasone0b Gab for our apmlon. > in our opmbn, the wnarcbl sfat«nena referred to eGre pnaent faNty, in aR mateaal rnpeeb, tG rnmaMeted INunela p«F tins a SmIM'a Food d Drug Canes. Inc. end aubaldlarlee a DaxmGr 28, 1991 end December 29, 1990. and Da conselMeted resuns a tlreN opemtkna and tlrar rash Iowa fa eeeh a tla three Neal Yesa m tla pedod anted December 28, 1991, m oonMrMly wleh garorady ee eepted xeorrrrting pdrrclpbs. > the htanegemerrt a SmIM's Food 8 Drug Cerrten, hre. and N auGldlabs has the reapmelbxlty 1« tG pnpaa tqn, haegYltr, aG ollteahny a the xaanpanyarg wa salldated 6rerrcml atatermms.lG .fat«rwrrm worn propand in aarnre«rce wllh ttaremgY accepted examt- mg pdrrclpba, using Marngmrom's beet estknates and Judpnem whero neransery. Manegerrrant also prepared tG dGr Nrforrnetlon in tG amruM report arM b respwr srom hX N aeeuracy and oonebfency with the eoneatF dated INrarrclal sbtemarb. > hdanegerrrerrt ma4rtakls a cost elbcDVe rystem d mtemel c«rbob Out prorMes renarede severance a to iG kneDiy ens ngebglry a 9u rnneoge.ted tinerrda sGtemenb ant urdeaymg tmsacRoru and gra aebpwdmg a web aga4ut kas a «rawh«4ed un. MansywrrwR heAern thls aystan d krterrrsl connob, ertPrtanad by Ib krterrW audltMrg tlarta tins, asarxG 0re+daWacY eM praRb d grrarulal np«t- kaL > Our Nalepaldarrt audNra. Emit a Ywrrg, audlled llw rnrudidated Ikrarrelel stelarronb in accordance with genengy aceeptod euMtMlg sterrtlarh to ertlependerdy anew tG Mr pnsadatmn, m aN meteAN respects, a the Certrpany'a eomolMeted IFrerrelal atalmante. > iG Man conarattee a the ewrd a Dkeaton cembta erdNety a directen who aro not dlkers «errploren d the Cornp«ry TG Mdn r:ananntee nreeb psdodkalty with fG lndeperldarn audnon arq terrWarO' managsrrrard eo resbw itre n.rms a a«Rt wok .rra any aarxrranb on tG atle0uacy a the system d hrlarrrel cmbole arW the pinny a nnanrAel relrortNlg. > We tageve the comon detect nrrumlal abtemenb and Mstaa nn.nciN hdomr- tbn M tG annuN rep«t act accurate in eq matedd reapecte and met frier won Irepared m accordance with genaaly aocepte0 ecc«nUtg princlpms. > ~~~ San lake City, tllah lamury 27, 1992 OeRnY P. Srrdlh Robot D. BoNlelal ( Irnmm~n rl Ihr ennJ rr r wit hv. 1 ,rnrtirr Pri r Prradr,C avA naAt Intl! ttr rJinr n/h,n rhrrl D,mnnnl Ullrror Smi[thli n,:,i Fis;;tl 7 ~~~7 Nat sales $532,922 5547.007 $544,020 $593,482 $2,217.437 Grose profit 118,855 ]20,285 12t,925 134,524 493.589 Net Irrcomo 10.408 10,844 12,228 11.618 45,097 Net Income par common share .41 .43 .42 .39 L86 NYSE p4ce range Nigh 411/2 433/4 423/8 39 low 283/4 361/2 351/2 301/4 I-nu+I 79,x1 Not seise 5487,745 $501,191 $510,188 5532,271 $2.031,373 Oro95 pr01N 108,152 109,387 111.354 118,426 442,319 Net lrwomo 8,139 8,634 8.620 9,021 34.314 Net Income per common when .32 .34 .34 .36 138 NYSE price Hoge Nigm 27 3/8 33 3/4 341/2 30 3/4 Low 23 263/8 243/4 243/4 I i,rnl 7",~y Not sabre 5399.241 5421.846 $432,457 $478,016 $1,731,559 Groasprofll 86,775 92.425 94,631 102,985 376,816 Net Income 5,878 5,955 7,217 7,281 28.131 Nat Income per common share 29 .MI .28 .29 L38 NYSE glee range MIS 21 5/B 24 7/e 26 bw 201/2 201/2 20 7/e Fite )bnr Sunrrunnr ni Selri trd Financinf Rnr1 Uprrrtii~r,~; Drtht SrnithS Net sales Grovs proM OperaBng, selling aM atlminlstn8ve expame Imeroat expanse Irxome hen operatlena [bbro Incarro taxes Income /roar operotbm Change In mettwd of eccourNng for Income taxes Net Income Average number o/ cannon Maros outetenaing Net Incane per cannon abate: Irreama Iram operatiaw Accwming change Net Incarre OIVI4eMa per common snaro Book value pa common Man 1?ala,n i' ~la'~'I Unla Nat property arM equipment Total aueh Leng4arm 4ebl, bee curron mahrltba Re4eamable Preferre4 Stock, bna wrrant melurNbe Canmon atoc8troldere' equity hr'r, r (rprrahn,~ bald Number o/ storm Total atom aquaro footage Number o/ empbyem $2,217,437 $2,031,373 81,731,559 $3,393,091 $1,056,029 493,589 442,318 376.816 300,697 233,316 344,383 323,792 277.986 222.147 189,31H 30.319 25,595 28,290 25,409 19,883 73,397 54,714 41,531 28,099 24,848 46,097 34,3]A 28,L91 17,899 11,848 4,400 45,097 34,314 26,131 17,899 19,046 27,397,973 25,272,011 22,479,281 19,471,508 19.724,439 S L85 $ 138 $ 1.18 S .91 $ .74 .23 L65 138 LSB .91 .97 36 .28 .10 18.83 10.81 9.53 fi.77 4.88 $ 881,360 $837,312 S 61L346 8 389,269 9 328.831 1,198,889 891,718 728,482 582.097 478,540 375,832 328,190 257,208 292,776 224.848 7,401 9.448 9,542 10,882 11,890 474,388 288,188 240,920 111,$85 95,287 109 95 98 91 88 8,773,000 5,580,000 5,235,000 4,534,000 3,887,000 18.303 15,208 15,288 32,388 8,838 Sm;, itr,,, ., ~L)r lafiey P. Smkh Chmnnmi n11Nr• Brurr.". „' Dirrttrn+an.l Chir' L[n uhte Okirrr RkhaN 0. Smkh Tnvgere on,l Chrn pJzvnhrrq <A+rri r Robert D. BdlrMer 6lrrnh;~ l nr Pr,.uln;Lmd (7trrl Faunnnl UN,a•r James W. HellseY Srrunr 69rr Prrsulnp erul G+pgrefa Nnnfdrip ['iarlar RenneM A. Whka Srrunr Virc Prradrnf mn7 RrQinnnl M,rva,prr, (nl,lnrrnn Rrqu+n Dal.omre Arreerson Rrhr Lf'n ;rr'hr tin'n1nN ,;d A7nrkrl n g ltrrtcfar. ~I ^!mn•im AUn Kfilnrl Rodney H. Brady !`mv,imL i hirl !'rrrehrr nm;nllr Pm rn,rl,rvnl t;r l orlxnu M1re a hvrndr nchu,C nunt~nv Alan fl. Hoofer Mnrmynq• Grnrrul Pminn nr;llan H,xirrf Gnnlnnu. n Jn~rab~ ime~f mart Imr;krnp INrrh,fl~hli, Allen P. MartlMale Rahrcd Fnrmrrlu Chamrmn , d fhr Ii,xxni al 1'In'rrhva nnJ C!urq I'rrnrhrr ONircr Duane Petero RrfnrJ, I'nrmrr'Iv I;x+` uNrr Vvr Prnrdrr,l uud 6nvral AAann,pa nl H.F Puu (.name ~ n Rey V. Rose Rtlurd, I'nrrnrrly Pn•.idenl of Kn;,Q Srryrr Srgrrrnar krk Free L Smith Prrsrdrnt of Frrd $rmfh'e Flomdr Aummrhiln of Pnlm jprrrrp., an auto dmlrrship; t'n5idrnt ul Frrd Smrth'~ laguar'Rnll= Rnvcr o~ RanrH.r Mvngr,nr. iyil(i dnilrr<lup Dou®8610M Tl6ert !ire CVmrhs Clark fteuneLt` PrnlrK,mr of Mnrkrnin,Q m Bu(mm Cnllrgr artd Pnstdrnf orPryrlv>,Qruph:rs Inkmutionnl pf Cmmda, Lh1., a nxarAelir rr.~mrrp /rmr f.Y('<'li h,'f l i+HllrprlCl' JeRroY P. SmIM Rkhard D. SmHh Robert D. BolhMer lames W. HalHey NanrwM A. MRrka C,nunnn,rtmn l nrn•til h+' leflrey p. SmIN Deana Petero Rey V. Pose An~61 t_1rnmliB`rr Allan P. MaMMek RodrroY N. Brady Alan R, Noefer iircvh;r [ )HI, rr, 1e1/reY P. Smith Chavrran nl fhr &s+rJ ni Dvealnra red Char F,'xrnrh:e tlry¢rr RlMard D. Smith Prrsdrnt and Chu r ~ryrnlirr,Q OPI[rr Robek D. Bo11Mer F'ravhxv l9cr Prc;tdrre nrut Chir/Fnran: Nl Oklca RkMM C. Hylekl Srninr Virr Nrrsidrnf„ Hurrmn Rrxmnrs Michael C. Frol Srrunr Vsr Pre'ident Gmrrml Cnumel nrrd Cor{u.aM Srarmrv 1. Cralp ORbert °mnrr Vrir PrrSNrut and Rrgmnrl Mnnq;n, 5nuthxrrst RYln9r lames W. Hallway Srrunr L'¢e Prr~idrnt and ["rgrvnfa Nm~InMn Dnritor leay R. McfblR :;n!mr V;rr Prnidrvt Grgrnnfr Clrtrlnprnmf Alrol Porter Srn;nr Var Prrsrdrnt mul RrQimml Mnnagrr, Intrnnnunlnin Rr,Gum Matthew 0. Teak Grnuv l'irr Prreuerrt. Firmnrr and irrnvurr Fred F. Urbanek 5rninr 49n• Prr~rdnrt, Fni ilifv btgmrnirrg Herxreth A. Whha Gnnnr l'in• Prrnidrnf and Rrninnnl MnnnQ+r, CnllMrnet ftr;¢urn ~~(~h~ti l'r;r P+r<irlrrr'< James Actor Paul Tedr l'icr Prrsidrnl Meaf D;rerhv Vice Pmstden4 Contrnlfn Peter N. Behr Vrre Prasrdeaf. Cnrynrnlr Cnurtvl. Assistant Srcrrtary, Peter F. Cower Vice PrnidrnL Grrntry Fuye BroM Farmwortn Vrre Prnr'drnr, Uprratrnn: DirrcLV, Intermnunlain Rrgrpn NenMA R. Findley Vier Pmulrnq Op'rnHnns DireRnr. $nufhttnt RtCinn Don NlaarY Vicr PrnidrnL Manogemerrt Inforra4nn tiystevne Robert Lee Vrre Pnwidrnt. fairy and GJ!ure Plnnf A1nnage NennMh A. MaNnONe V4'r PnTUlrnf. Mrrdwrrdi~~ iug. Cndfinnra Repum Bruce B. MNler Vim Pmsrdrn4 Merrharuln in,Q. tioulhurst Rrginn Nary M. MoeNN Vice Prreu:rnl, Dmelnr n/ Ryyrnx Rlclnrtl 1. Nebon Vrre Prneien4 Mrrdmndrr- in,y Inf~mrnunraiu Rr,~Qirrr Never F. Sknnem Virr Prn!drnb O)rrnhon< Drrrrfrr. Gvh/+rrtm Rrgu+n snalbr Tnorrwa Vire Presided. Puhlic Affairs Sb W88ams Vke Presulcn4 Ero:en Lhrugh Plant Mannfn elak WaoM Vire Presulrnl, Dirtttm al Pharmary Mark WaoM vice Prrsident, Soles and Mnchandicin,Q Direrfnr, Nanimis Drtdsinn Cnnrnrrtr Ir¢ormntinr; l or(xnak Hrndquarh'rs Smkh'a Food a Orup, CerdeR,Ix. 1550 Swtlr Redwood Rd. Salt lake City, Illah 84101 Tekghaw:180118741400 Annual Mreting The 1994 Annual MeetkrR d StockhoMMS wle a held K 5:00 P.M. (MDT) on WerhraadsT, ApN 29, S8B2 et Corporsb 1550 SouM Redwood Rd. Sdt LAb CNy, lltall Stork Exe'Image SmIM's Food a Drrr{ Carders, Inc. b Sated ar the New Yak Stoclt F><clnn`e carder fhe aYmtel `SFD'. ShrrkJrnldrrs of Rrand There wero 325 rYn. A Cananm StocIOelMn end 805 Cbsa B Cannrrarr Stockholder d record r a OaMnOSr 28, 199E 7YarutAr rigrut dnd IZegisrrnr Fhst Sscudty Barrk d Blab, N,A. Stock TnmM Dspertnnnl P.O. Bon 30007 SNt lake Clly, Ilnlr 84]20 Q~ '(vnrnfc'r A,~rrtt The early of new rock Corlwrste Trwt 9o Waahk¢on skeet 4th Floa New cork. New rock 1o2es Indc7rendent .IudiMrs FtMt a YourrQ 60 South Meln Sleet, srm 1+00 Sek lake CAY+ Utsh 84]A4 rnrn!10-K A copy d Faint iodc br 1851 p Bbd w8h tlw Secalllw and Eaohsrr[ps Cerrardwlea for SrMth's Food s Drv{ Canton, Inc. wM Oe evaBsOb to stocMelden upwr rsprsl to: Inraala Rdalbro 9mIM's fee0 • DrrK CeMSrs, Ire. 1560 9oulh Redwood Rd. Salt lake CNYr Illah 89100 ~~„~s~'~ ~,~„'~ ~~;~c 4 C7 • 'I"i ~ i -'r"::". "';A~ 'n i!.! ' :' MA.N;.:":": i',F i tiG ''!!RO*.:Gii '!i(7~I{30R°i^ODS 6 AROCMi ..............:_ ~ .;."~,. ;...,,. ~,,r: r.- ;:gr'ni?'~ n:'d.; F 97yi:YARD n'v"F, RF.NCF70 r"'Cr~.~.~y.~, Ai., f , e - a: i ti 4 III • x ' c M' ~ ~ .l 1 ~ 1 `5 ~ r ~ / .:i L~ 'f' ~a/ ?S ~ ~ ` 1 1 PROJECT A5 PRESENTED W ITN c: FRONT LOADING DOCKS • ~r (. • ENTRANCE LANE TO LOADING BEHIND COMPLEX AT MILLIKF.N & ffiGHLAND AVE, FONTANA. THIS SHOWS EXCELLENT TREATMENT OF EXCAVATED SLOPE S RETAINING WALL. 3 t C~ • VIEW FROM SURFACE STREET. MIiLIREN b HIGffi,AND AVER ~ i`• L.y LI PEDESTRIAN VIEW FROM THE SURFACE STREET. REAR OF SMITHS, FONTANA. CART STORAGE (TO BE LOCATED IN FRONT WEST SIDE OF 2ROJECT ON FOOTHILL) • • REAF2 LOADING DOCXS AS THEY COULD LOOK IN REAR OF SMITHS PROSECT BELOW SAN BERNARDINO ROAD.