Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/12/16 - Agenda PacketC�'CnbtphC' GSO QTY OF RANCHO C UCAMOWA UATn�Y��TTT(\MANCIL 1977 Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Wednesday, December 16, 1981 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. _ A. Pledge of Allegiance. • B. Roll Call: Frost_, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge_, and Schlosser. C. Approval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Advisory Commission Meeting, Thursday, December 17, 1981 7:00 p.m. - Lion's Park Community Center. b. Reappointments to the Advisory Commission and Historical Preservation Commission. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -12 -16 in the __ 1 amount of $350,192,50. b. Forward Claim by State Farm Insurance Company for Palla 3 and Gerald Hector to city attorney for handling. c, Acceptance of Parcel Map 6051 - Nelson: located on the 8 north side of Manzanita between Sacramento and Beryl. 0 City Council Agenda -2- December 16, 1981 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 6051. d. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6085 - Koll -Lyon Associates; 11 located at the north east corner of Milliken and 4th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 6085. L,o� e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Site Approval 80 -13 - Church of Latter Day Saints; located on the southeast corner of Sapphire Street and Highland Ave. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -188 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR SITE APPROVAL NUMBER 80 -13. f. Acceptance of Map, Agreement, Security, and Real Pro - 22 perty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for ParceT� Map 6582 - Praver Brothers Investment; located at the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Blvd. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PRAVER BROS. INVESTMENT (CHARLES HUGES, OWNER), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME, RESOLUTION NO. 81 -190 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CLAIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6582, IMPROVEMENT AGREE- MENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. • g. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security 36 for Director Review 81 -24 - Tokai of America; located on the northeast corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue. • r] City Council Agenda -3- December 16, 1981 RESOLJTION NO. 81 -191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -24. h. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and _ Lien Agreement for Minor Development Review 81 -36 - Foseco; located at 7th Street and Santa Anita. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FOSECO, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. i. Acceptance of North Town Phase II Street and Drainage _ Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN PHASE IT STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. j. Release of Bonds: -Tract 9430 - located at the northwest corner of Haven and Wilson. Owner: R. L, Sievers & Sons, Inc. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $102,000.00 - Parcel Map 6228 - located on the north side of La Vin Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues. Owner: Leo Lamb. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 34,000.00 -Tract 9421. Owner: Nubank International Inc. For subdivision signs and sales office: 70 -20 -401 $ 150.00 70 -20 -400 $ 1,000.00 70 -20 -401 $ 2,000.00 37 44 45 50 51 City Council Agenda -4- December 16, 1981 41 -Tract 9422. Owner: Marlborough Development Corp. _ For subdivision signs, sales office, and design center. 70 -20 -400 $ 1,000.00 70 -20 -401 $ 4,000.00 -Tract 9472 - located on the north side of 19th _ Street west of Havenue Avenue. Owner: Boulevard Development. Acceptance of Reduced Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond (road) $68,000.00 Labor & Material Bond (road) 34,000.00 Release of Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond (road) $231,000.00 Labor & Material Bond (road) 116,000.00 k. Set January 6, 1982 for public hearing for: Environmen- tal Assessment and Planned Development No. 81 -14 - Pfeiler. A change of zone from R -1 to R -3 /PD for the development • of 328 condominium units on 23.6 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Turner and Arrow Route - APN 208 -34 -9 and 11. 1. Set January 6, 1982 for public hearing for: Appeal of Planning Commission decision on Environmental Assess- ment and Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -13 - Rothschild. The development of a 3000 square foot commercial building and self- service gasoline station on .70 acres of land in the C -2 zone located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 208- 241 -20. Jm. Reserves for Contingency. 58 Recommendation: Staff recommends at this time not to set aside any funds for contingency purposes in order to maintain flexibility of operation on a day -to -day basis. n. Alcoholic Beverage License for Iksan and Maryann C. L, 60 Kim, Quality Market, 10120 25th Street, for off sale beer and wine. o. Forward Claim for Damages by Kim Darlene Barrows to the 61 City Attorney for handling. • • City Council Agenda -5- December 16, 1981 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. CONTINUATION OF JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE DRAF E- DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE DRAFT ENVI NMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED RANCHO REDE ELOP ENT PR ECT. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -12 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -13 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT • FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -14 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOM- MENDING ADOPTING OF SAID REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -196 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. • 0 1, City Council Agenda -6- December 16, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 166 (first reading) 92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 97 81 -01 TT 1853 - AMERICAN NATIONAL/BARR-ET IRVINE. R changerom R -1 -8500 to R- 3 /P.D. or a total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona. APN 202 - 171 -42. ORDINANCE NO. 163 (second reading) 99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 171 -42 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET AT RAMONA FROM R -1 -8500 TO R- 3 /P.D. C. AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN. Amend- 100 ments to include mode ication of t e and use definition for "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" and "Building Contractor's Offices and Yards," the provisions for Building Contractor's Offices and Yards in certain areas of the Plan, and to provide for railroad service spur locations along 7th Street, east of Devore Freeway by allowing the L-.ndscape setback to be maintained no less than 20 feet from the ultimate face of curb when adjacent to rail service. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -194 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CONTRACTOR'S OFFICES AND YARDS AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE FREEWAY. • City Council Agenda -7- December 16, 1981 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. SELECTION OF FINANCIAL CONSULTANT FOR ASSESSMENT '109 DISTRICT 79-1. Staff recomnen s that Council retain FielTmman, Rolapp 8 Associates as financial consultant in the selection of bond underwriters for the Industrial Assessment District. B. REPORT AND RESOLUTION ON CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDE- 118 LIN S. Staff report by Michael airin. This is a Resolution adopting the formal city environmental guidelines. The guidelines are required by State Environmental Law and have been prepared in accordance and in supplement to the State Environmental Review Guidelines. The city guide- lines are simply formalizing the process which the city has been using over the last four years. No new procedures are proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDE - LINES AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 15000 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, C. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NEEDS. Staff report by Bill Holley. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to December 23, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. for second reading of Ordinance No. 166 which must be adopted before December 31, 1981. • 122 138 1. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lion's Paris Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, December 16, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m, by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Present were: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren H. Wasserman: Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Absent was: Councilman Michael A. Palombo. Approval of Minutes: None had been submitted for approval. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Mayor Schlosser announced that the City wanted to continue with the Spring Clean up Campaign this year. h. Appointments to the Advisory Commission. Terms of office for the following Advisory Commissioners expired an November 17: Alta Loma: Mary Barlow and Helen Blanchard Etiwanda: Mary Lane and Glenn Rankin Cucamonga: Nacho Gracia and Faye Stamper Mary Barlow had requested to resign and Faye Stamper had moved out of the City. All other members had expressed an interest in reappointment to the Commission. Reappoint- ments would be for a four year term, to begin November 17, 1981 and end November 17, 1985. Council had received two applications. One from Peter J. Pitassi from Cucamonga, and one from Anne Calinsky from Alta Loma. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to accept the resignation of Mary Barlow with .: letter of thanks to be sent over the Mayor's signature to both Mary Barlow and Faye Stamper for their services to the community. Also, to reappoint Helen Blanchard, Mary Lane, Glenn Rankin, and Nacho Gratis for a four year term; and to appoint Anne Calinsky to fill the vacancy in the Alta Loma Committee, and for Council to schedule an interview with the Cucamonga applicant at a later time. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Appointments to the Historical Commission: Terms of office for Robert Hickcox, Gene Billings, and Ada Cooper expired in June without Council making reappointments. This action is needed by Council. Motion: Moved by Mikcic, seconded by Bridge to reappoint Robert Hickcox, Gene Billings, and Ada Cooper to a four year term to the Historical Preservation Commission. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palumbo. C. Mayor Schlosser announced an addition to the. Agtada, item .SD, Alta Loma School District Request for Crossing Guard at 19th and Cartilla - Deer Canyon School. d. Councilman Frost announced that there would be a special meeting of the Planning Mr. Frost also announced that the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee ad- journed to a special Town Meeting to be held on January 12 at 7:00 p.m. at the Etiwanda Intermediate School. e. Councilman Mikels requested an added item to the Agenda, item 5E, "Video Games and Arcades." f. Nacho Gracia requested that Consent Calendar item "i" be removed for dis- cussion. g. Mr. Wasserman requested that Council adjourned to an Executive Sessior. flowing the meeting to discuss legal matters. h. Councilman Mikels requested that Consent Calendar item "e" be removed for discussion. 1. Chuck Buquet, requested that Consent Calendar item "m" be removed for discussion. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -12 -16 in the amount of $350,192.50. b. Forward Claim by State Farm Insurance Company for Pella and Gerald Hector to city attorney for handling. C. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6051 - Nelson: located on the north side of Manzanita between Sacramento and Beryl. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 6051. d. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6085 - Koll -Lyon Associates: located at the northeast corner of Milliken and 4th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 6085. e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Site Approval 80 -13 - Church of L ^tter Day Saints: located on the southeast corner of Sapphire Street and Highland Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR SITE APPROVAL NUMBER 80 -13. f. Acceptance of Map, Agreement, Security, and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 6582 - Praver Brothers Investment: located at the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PRAVER BROS. INVESTMENT (CHARLES HUGHES, OWNER), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP "HER 6582, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IM- PROVEMENT SECURITY. g. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Director Re- view 81 -24 - Tokai of America: located on the northeast corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIREC- TO REVIEW NO. 81 -24. h. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Minor Development Review 81 -36 - Foseco: located at 7th Street and Santa Anita. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FOSECO, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. i. Acceptance of North Town Phase II Street and Drainage Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN PHASE II STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. J. RELEASE OF BONDS: *Tract 9430 - located at the northwest corner of Haven and Wilson. Owner: R. L. Sievers 6 Sons, Inc. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $102,000. *Parcel Map 622,, - located on the north side of La Vine Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues. Owner: Leo Lamb. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 34,000. *Tract 9421. Owner: Nubank International, Inc. For subdivision signs and sales office: 70 -20 -401 70 -20 -400 70 -20 -401 $ 150. $ 1,000. $ 2,000. *Trace 9422. Owner: Marlborough Development Corp. For subdivision signs, sales office, and design center. 70 -20 -400 70 -20 -401 $ 1,000. $ 4,000. Acceptance of reduced bonds: Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 68,000. Labor 6 Material Bond (road) 34,000. Release of Bonds: Faithful Perforn,.nce Bond (road) $231,000. Labor S Material Bond (road) 116,000. k. Set January 6, 1982 for public hearing for: Environmental Assessment and Planned Development No. 81 -14 - Heiler. A change of zone ` 7, R -1 to R -3 /PD for the development of 328 condominium units on 23.; acres of land located at the northeast corner of Turner and Arrow Route - APN 208 -34 -9 and 11. 1. Set January 6, 1982 for public hearing for: Appeal of Planning Commission decision an Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -13 - Rothschild. The development of a 3000 square foot commercial building and self- service gasoline station on .70 acres of land in the C -2 zone located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue APN 208 - 241 -20. m. Reserves for Contingency. Recommendation: Staff recommends at this time not to set aside any funds for contingency purposes in order to maintain flexibility of opera- tion on a day -to -day basis. n. Alcoholic Beverage License for Iksan and Maryann C. L. Kim, Quality Market, 10120 25th Street, for off -sale beer and wine. o. Forward Claim for Damages by Kim Darlene Barrows to the city attorney for handling. Discussion of Consent Calendar items: Item e: Councilman Mikels stated he was concerned about encroachment and wanted to know how many feet there were between the southern portion of the proposed project and the northern boundary of the existing subdivision. Mr. Hubbs stated that this was the Foothill Freeway right -of -way which was approximately 310 feet. Item f: Nacho Gracia stated that he requested this item be discussed since he wanted to thanrc .he city council and the city staff for the cooperation that was given on the two phases of the North Town project. Item m: Chuck-Buquet, ?994 Onyx Court, expressed concern as to why we were not putting money into contingency. Mr. Wasserman explained that when a need ;irises, it is brought to Council to appropriate the money from reserves rather thn-i in- clude it as a contingency item. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Mr. Wasserman provided an overview of the project area, outlined how a redevelop- ment agency financing actually works, and a summary of types of projects which could be financci through a redevelopment agency in order to solve some of the problems which have been identified in our community. .. had p'. oer:y wicnin the proposed redevelopment area, and also with other toxin[ agencies. Mr. Wasserman stated that the city had received communication from the Lewis Develop- ment Company, dated December 14 indicating support of the redevelopment project. Council and Agency also received some revisions to the draft redevelopment plan fror.. the consultant and legal counsel, Manny DeDios went over some of the financing mechanisms. Mayor Schlosser opned the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Rudy Guzman asked that since the city council serves as the redevelopment agency board, what happens when there is a vacancy on the council? Would that member still be on the agency board or would the new councilmember be on the agency? Mr. Wasserman answered that if there was a change in the council, then the new councilmember would become the new agency member. Mr. Guzman stated that at the last hearing there was a reference made that a homeowner would be eligible to borrow low interest loans. How long would it be before a property owner would be able to obtain this type of loan? Mr. Brown answered that this was one of the policy decisions which the redevelopment agency would be prioritizing in the months to come. Councilman Bridge asked what percentage of funds would be available within the next three to five years. Mr. DeDios stated that legally we were not entitled to receive actual flow of increments until fiscal year 1982 -83. Tax increment projections have been made and in the next three to four years we could expect about 25 percent of the ultimate increment which might come to the Agency. There being no further public discussion, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Mr. Mikels expressed concern with the suggested revisions for the redevelopment plan: in particular, on page 76 of the Agenda Packet. He stated that he had never seen low income defined as income not exceeding 50% of the median income. Mr. DeDios stated that the 507, refers to the very low incomes. Mr. Brown stated that this figure was contained in the California Health and Safety Code ip th- 50000 section. Mr. Mikels stated that on page 79 of the Agenda Packet, the sentence, "In order to insure that the requirements of this plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary... He felt this should be changed to "shall as it deems necessary." Mr. Mikels stated that since we deleted a reference to potential involvement with the Foothill Freeway improvement, we should also delete item 11 on page 15 of the Plan, modifications to I -10 access at Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Frost asked Mr. DeDios to review the changes in the December 10 and December 16 memos. Mr. Abe DeDios stated that all the revisions made in the December 10 memo were incorporated into the December 16 with one minor change. That change was on page 3, section 313: the second sentence was added, "The Housing Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Pla- ind!cates the need for providing low income housing within the City." Mr. Mikels pointed out that the language which he had referred to before, "the Agency may as it deems necessary," appeared again in Section 254 of the memos. Mr. Brown stated that this language arrived out of discussion with staff where it was pointed out that the original language, the shall language, would mean that all subdivision maps would have to come before the redevelopment agency before being, processed by the city. Mr. Mikels stated that his intent was to limit this to orojects which used tax increments, not for the redevelopment agency to look at every single development that wen[ on within the project area. However, there would be projects which would not be using redevelopment financing which would be influencing projects whicn do. He said that maybe they should set guidelines as to which projects they would want to review. Mr. Lam stated that regulations for development within the redevelopment area does not change since they most follow all the policies of the city. He felt there were safeguards since the agency would deal with the financial mechanisms and stipulations which only the agency would wish to involve itself. When the agency approved a project, they will be looking at the conseouences of any special condi- tions which have been placed on it to the surrounding area. The agency will see those things they want special conditions on. Anything else will always follow standard city regulations. Mr. Lam suggested using the "may" language and add the sentence, "However, all projects that utilize tax increment financir;; or other- wise enter into a contractural arrangement in the redevelopment area shell be reviewed and approved by the agency. Discussion continued regarding the "may" versus the "shall" language. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to keep the permissible "may" language. Mr. Mikels stated that he felt this Body should set the policy guidelines to de- termine projects to be reviewed. Council felt a motion was not necessary and concurred with Mr. Frost's suggestion to maintain the "may" language. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RAB1 -12 RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -12 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODER- ATE- INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOP- MENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, the public portion was closed. Mr. Mikels asked if they were going to give staff some direction to come back with Policy options for approval of projects within the redevelopment area. Mr. Wasserman stated that based on the discussion, staff understood the concerns and will bring some guidelines back to council for consideration. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -12, and to waive further reading of the resolution. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -13. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL rtPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Mr. Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed. Mr. Brown stated that he had some recommended changes to this resolution which were: SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Agencv of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga certifies the Environmental Impart Report for the pronosed Rancho Redevelopment Project and hereby finds that the final environmental impact report has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Agency's local CEQA Guidelines. To the extent that the Redevelopment Plan allows the occurrence of signi- ficant effects identified in the final EIR without full mitigation, the Agency has identified specific economic, ecological, and social reasons to sunnort its action which make infeasible the project alternatives described in the final EIR or additional mitigation measures. The Agency finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in the Final EIR, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Report to the City Council. Mitigation, measures have been made a condition of significant environmental effects identified in the finial EIR. The Redevelopment Plan itself is a mitigation measure which is intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects of blighting con- ditions identified in the Redevelopment Plan, Report to the City Council, and Assessment of Conditions Report incorporated herein by reference. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -13 with the recommended changes and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -14. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -14 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTING OF SAID REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Chairman Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RASI -14, and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Mikels. ABSENT: Palombo. Mr. Mikels stated he voted no because he wanted to withhold his support of the document until he saw the guidelines. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -196. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DE- CLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public convent. There being none, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81 -196 and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -197. He stated this was the same ns the Agency's Resolution No. RA81 -13, and will have the same changes. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. on .ed by _ .L ..,g vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None, ABSENT: Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 166. ORDINANCE NO, 166 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordin- ance No. 166. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser, NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing on the Ordinance. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set the second reading For December 23, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Center. Mayor Schlosser called a break at 9:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 p.m. with all members of staff present and the following council members: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. Councilman Palombo was absent from the meeting. AMERICAN NATIONAL /BARRET IRVINE. A change of zone from R -1 -8500 to R -3 /PD for a total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona. APN 202 - 171 -42. Staff report by Jack Lam. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 163. ORDINANCE NO. 163 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 171 -42 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET AT RAMONA FROM R -1 -8500 TO R -3 /PD. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 163. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Bridge stated that he went by to take a look at the property. He could not see that there would be any impact on the church. Councilman Frost stated that he was only interested in the type of buffer used. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to approve the zone change and the issuance of a negative declaration by approving Ordinance No. 163. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: Palombo. y vt _1 .ng „_ . s u and yards in certain areas of the Plan, and to provide for railroad service spur locations along 7th Street, east of Drvore Freeway by allowing the landscape set- back to be maintained no less than 20 feet from the ultimate face of curb when adjacent to rail service. Staff report by Tim Beedle, Se -.ior Planner. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council ass: William Eels, speaking on behalf of the developer, recommended approval of the resolution. Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve the Planning Co'mmission's recommendation and approve Resolution No. 81 -194 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -194 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECO[MENDING AMEND- MENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CONTRACTOR'S OFFICES AND YARDS AND LAND- SCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE FREEWAY. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 5A. SELECTION OF FINANCIAL CONSULTANT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1 Recommenda- tion by staff was that Council retain Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates as financial consultant in the selection of bond underwriters for the Industrial Assessment District. Lauren Wasserman presented the staff report. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to approve staff's recommendation to retain Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates as financial consultant. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 ( Palombo absent). 5B. REPORT AND RESOLUTION ON CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES. Staff report by Michael Vairin. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed, Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81 -195 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried 4 -0 -1. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 81 -195. RESOLUTION N0, 81 -195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 15000 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 5D. ADDED ITEM: ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR CROSSING GUARD AT 19TH AND CARTILLA FOR DEER CANYON SCHOOL. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Mr. Wasserman stated that if council concurred with the request for a crossing guard, staff would come back at a future meeting for the transfer of funds. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve the request for crossing guards for the Deer Canyon School. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Palombo absent). 5E. ADDED ITEM: GAME ARCADES. Councilman Mikels stated that there has been a moratorium in Los Angeles on game arcades. Because of this, there is a possibility for an explosion of these in our area. He requested a review be done by the Planning Commission regarding the zoning and kinds of establishments these would be allowed in and requested that staff come back to Council with a report. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to adjourn to an Executive Session to reconvene on December 23, 1981 for a special meeting. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Palombo absent). The meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully_submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk r Ll / TTV /1 T A WTI TTA I TTI A AAIIATf A STAFF REPORT�''� of r F U December 11, 1981 ian TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager /t RE: Reappointments to the City Advisory Commission The terms of office of the following members of the Rancho Cuca- mong Advisory Commission expired November 17, 1981. Alta Loma: Mary Barlow Helen Blanchard Etiwanda: Mary Lane Glenn Rankin Cucamonga: Nacho Gracia Faye Stamper If it is Council's desire, it is therefore necessary to reappoint these members to the Advisory Commission. Their new terms of office would be four years beginning November 17, 1981 and ending November 17, 1985. All of the membE.: of the Advisory Commission whose terms have exf�red.haye- expressed -an-interest in reappointment with the exception o� ry% B.;irlow_who has asked to resign and Faye Stamper who has moved out of ttbe CT-fy: - - -- - -- Therefore, staff would recommend, if Council so desires, that the following members of the Advisory Commission be reappointed to four year terms commencing Novmeber 17, 1981: Alta Loma: Helen Blanchard Etiwanda: Mary Lane Glenn Rankin Cucamonga: Nacho Gracia Continued-- Decemher 11, 1981 • Reappointments to Advisory Commission Page Two It will also be necessary in the near future for the Ci'v Council to appoint two Commissioners to fill the vacancies on the Alta Loma and Cucamonga subcommittees. Attached are the applications of those residents from Alta Loma and Cucamonga who have expressed an int:rest in serving o, the Advisory Commission. Thus far, the City has recc:ved applications from Peter T. Pitassi, A.I.A. (Cucamonga) and Ann Calinsky (Alta Loma). JHR /vz Enclosure • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f z U 19 ?7 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Pvrn /iV' r"vICN NAME J' PIT,a� • /4 ' ADDRESS /-rl7 kit -t�, c�c.ic AV PHONE cl,01)q 6—. OCCUPATION ARr'1- 11- rE=C�� EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 221` cIrAC t�G7 c�y f7'3M[�nl,n Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. Nr - • Why are you interested in this position? NYX X.1 ]U« • CF- C%'fJ fZ you consider to be your major qualifications? CJC"�A.E� PK'�••i;1�F =:'S c`.'F` fYJ� ri1T�.' L+a`c'7 TNT- lM t�f.f1.�NE REFERENCES: 1. N-• .t. A/A NJ 7 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. FO9TOFFICERO %907 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (711)9994991 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s', r vl j� A F 8 2 V > 197] 4;1�� CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: CITIZEN'S IZEN'S ADVISORY COMMISSION NAME NNE CONSTANTIN QPLTNSKY ADD Ae55_�4 F8 y�j1INDA. RANCHO CUCAMONGA (ALTA LOMA) PHONE (7141 987 -8911 OCCUPATION HOMEMAKER EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) HTGH SCHOOL '(�QTO1 12 YFARG Iry Y3(FSiS_IT.Y nF nvr.vnwwx �10��1 avcAFS Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, Please list. yFC 1gt AJ,d 3 d TUESDAYS Why are you interested in this position? RFASnNS STATED ON COVER TFTTFR What do you consider to be your major qualifications? r 0\ •• u1\ 5 E'@ Please attach a written statement containing any ad i ♦ona} infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Counc ilt e Y b E a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION NOV 251381 AM PM 4)8195pdg1Y)11253(4(556 POSTOFFICEBOX 907 • RANC )IOCUCA.BONOA,CALIFORNIA91130 • (715H114151 November 25, 1981 Anne C. Calinsky • 5468 Valinda Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 Phillip Schlosser, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Mayor Schlosser, I am interested in the vacated position on the Alta Loma Citizen's Advisory Commission. For quite some time now, I have been interested in working with the Commission because I would like to see our City develop the way that would be in the best interests of the people who live in Rancho Cucamonga. My major qualifications for the Alta Loma Citizen's Advisory Commisssion include the following: 1.) Due to the fact that I have attended the various Commission and Council meetings for more than a year, I feel that I have developed a good understanding of what the City of Rancho Cuca- • monga has planned for its future. 2.) 1 also consider myself to be highly qualified for the position because of my reliability in the past and my dedication to projects I undertake. I hope you will consider my application for this position. Respectfully submitted, Anne C. Calinsky 0' • J - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ct CAM0&' STAFF REPORT ° y.� a I O O P F � Z Date: December 16, 1961 UI 1977 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department subject: Appointment of Historic Preservation Commission The Commission seats held by Robert Hickcox, Gene Billings, and Ada Cooper are subject for immediate Council considera- tion. Due to an oversight by the Community Services Department, the terms of these three Commissioners quietly expired last June, without needed Council actions to reappoint seated members or make new selections. The needed action from Council would be to reappoint existing Commissioners or to appoint newly selected individuals to fill these positions which will run through June of 1985. The balance of Commission seats, now held by Maxine Strane, Helen Kilmurray, Beverly White, and Melicent Arner will be subject to Council consideration in June of 1983. All seated members are working effectively and efficiently together and are interested in continuing present direction of effort. Staff Recommendation: The appointment or reappointment of Commission members is solely within the purview of the City Council and therefore a staff recommendation would be inappro- priate. If I can answer any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Thank you. WLH:nm V y ' 9867 CITY CF RANCHL CUCAMONGA WARRANT RECONCILIATION 12 /16 /Rl PAGE 1 PARR 1 VEN R V E N D C R N A M E MARE REf kPEACC DISCOUNT NET I.SOO. ^O b 305 . ]5 3.4 S.c0 1.312.50 34.00 U. 185.41 1tl5.GU 55 1.361.52 51.50- R867 CITY LF MANCHL CUCAM,,NG4 ` PARR I VEN 1 V E N C 0 R N A M E Oas12 1025 PRUGRFSS BULLETIN �tlbl� 905 RANC�i�i CISV��S4L Sf MY ICC 0x530 OB08532 532 _ Ufl533 534 08 03535 00536 0d53 U Osi 06539 l CB54 0254 I G ?542 0,4543 a544 c \ 09545 1V S V L E482 SPILL CCNTFOL SPLY C MF 0525 $TAIICNEPS LLNP E540 SUN TLLEC.RAM 8544 SUPERINIENIit NT I�LCUY.ENI 0545 SURVEVCPS SVC CU 11I74 TURMEI 11NU 8785 TRAFFIC MGNT SYSTEMS 3635 TRIAD PHUIC 9L02 U R 5 CLNSIRULIICN CD I05 VAIMIN MICHAEL U 9290 MC ST EKC UNIT.0 NAY 9390 'nCSTEKN HIGHMAY PFI:000I 9525 WILLIAMS PRINTING. 0 9990 RIRGX CCHP SS95 YUMUN 15PDSAL SERVICE VOID FINAL ICT A IS WARRANT HECCACILIATILN 12/16/01 PAGE 2 DALE RL'IRIENCE UISCLUNT At( FINAL TOTALS S.GG 3x.SC 1sv.ua 5.ur. t s.L3 6.00 OU.05 1-1.05 1.8 ar.00 66.00 62.04 31.00 1,581.16 Il.al 6.559.51 4.Ii 211.46 19.00 11.50 IAU.A4 60.00 68.30 22.1S 215.00 69. UO 17 It 1.5'18.64 149.10 1.013.5E 60.00 3501192.50 ❑ STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ❑STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS OATS OURINSURED ACCI GENT OATE OUR CLAIM NUMBER- 1 —24 -81 Hector, Gerald 10 -28 -81 55 8408 757 O UR FILE NUMBER YOUR INSURED Unk (DR# 1121703 -11 Cit of Rancho Cucamonga VOpT lF ^.TPE95 A9pRtZ5 LOCATION OF LOSS: SID Archibald, 50 feet North of Arrow Highway 'PLEASE REFER TO THE CAPTIONED CLAIM NUMBER WHEN REPLYING From: r'City of Rancho Cucamonga , STATE FARM INSURANCE CLAIM OFFICE Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 2569 9320 Base Line Road Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 5269 Palo Verde Montclair, California 91763 L J 714- 624 -9661 BY: Fo1e— lai Service Represen ative_ CERTIFIED MAIL /RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED We have been informed that you are the insurance carrier for the party designated as your irj 6jcl Qn.(hiii gipfio(Jj of this letter. Our investigation of this accident establishes that your insured was responsible fowls AEiRWHO CUCAMONGA ©ADMINISTRATION Please accept this letter as notice of our subrogation rights under • Personal Injury Protection (PIP) ® Vehicle DamageAy NOV 30 1981' PH ❑ Medical 7181911DIUIp111213141S 6 Medical Payments Coverage (MPC) ❑ Other: 1 ❑ Should we be called upon to make payment under our policy, we will be looking to you for reimbnur� nt. M (� �Y ❑ We have made the following payments and request reimbursement as shown below: `A VN.U, M..R Sta,e, C-,-J ckt Name of our Payee PIP /MPC Net Vehicle Damage Payment (Less Salvage) ® STATE FARM MUTUAL O $ 162,71 AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Cherry Auto Bodes_ ❑ STATE FARM FIRE rs Policyholder (Tow S Labor ) ANO CASUALTY COMPANY ❑ STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ❑STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS OATS OURINSURED ACCI GENT OATE OUR CLAIM NUMBER- 1 —24 -81 Hector, Gerald 10 -28 -81 55 8408 757 O UR FILE NUMBER YOUR INSURED Unk (DR# 1121703 -11 Cit of Rancho Cucamonga VOpT lF ^.TPE95 A9pRtZ5 LOCATION OF LOSS: SID Archibald, 50 feet North of Arrow Highway 'PLEASE REFER TO THE CAPTIONED CLAIM NUMBER WHEN REPLYING From: r'City of Rancho Cucamonga , STATE FARM INSURANCE CLAIM OFFICE Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 2569 9320 Base Line Road Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 5269 Palo Verde Montclair, California 91763 L J 714- 624 -9661 BY: Fo1e— lai Service Represen ative_ CERTIFIED MAIL /RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED We have been informed that you are the insurance carrier for the party designated as your irj 6jcl Qn.(hiii gipfio(Jj of this letter. Our investigation of this accident establishes that your insured was responsible fowls AEiRWHO CUCAMONGA ©ADMINISTRATION Please accept this letter as notice of our subrogation rights under • Personal Injury Protection (PIP) ® Vehicle DamageAy NOV 30 1981' PH ❑ Medical 7181911DIUIp111213141S 6 Medical Payments Coverage (MPC) ❑ Other: 1 ❑ Should we be called upon to make payment under our policy, we will be looking to you for reimbnur� nt. M (� �Y ❑ We have made the following payments and request reimbursement as shown below: `A VN.U, M..R Sta,e, C-,-J ckt Name of our Payee PIP /MPC Net Vehicle Damage Payment (Less Salvage) Other Payment/Expense• Cherry Auto Body S $ 162,71 $ Cherry Auto Bodes_ $ $ 1333.32 S Policyholder (Tow S Labor ) $ $ 30.00 $ • Northern curve of newly- constructed concrete island protrudes into lane of traffic, Island was unmarked with reflectors or other warning devic c at the time of this loss. Insured struck same, Injuries renorted to driver s passenae Net Amount Paid Insured Vehicle aBy Company $ 1526. 05 Deductib ;e $ 50.00_ TOTAL 1576.05 7Rtachments: Copies of drafts, repair bills 0 4379.1 PRINTED IN U S.A. \J cc: Agent Chism �,;A!,:,II CA -L 0, �'N A V�OLb COI'N NOT NIGOT ALIE -ri L) U o :Aw No POI. NO '7 RAY TO THE ):DER OF --i IS, F� IT a­' 1AW, U= 111 II NS CO C�, 5TA' ;ARV P RE ZAB_A.T� C 5. A. "A J' A'FvC,cD 8Y r .... . _- STATE FARM INSURANCE y. T61 ........ COSTA M - E5A CAL;'OVI A 124:6 ­12 597 3 8 1 TT TD .1 f; 10 SOUTHERN C.A�lFCRINIA O�R CE ' :- Co�y NOT NEGOTIABLE *'A S. s NO� 'T �'S CAR NO, —DATE' _�'T -"T"' + "PAYTO, THE FI ' 1- Iwo oec Roc Ir 1\ V::- , -.ki 1 1, 4'r, i U 41 N, "I, 'N' IE V,, S., 64 IR�.. t ,Tm ro 1 S 7 —41 t S 'ZI .0, � 41 DOLLARS - I , - I . � . I. f I r T, C W11, E % r nr, I R AIR C" T.11AlY YARSCU EX] SKATE FARM M Tl UAL' A. T6 INS, CO STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUAL" TA CO. I RTS rARRI OLNERAL INS CO. STATZ F,,-M COLN" MUTUAL INS. 10. Ot TlxAS API`F�,E y STATE FARM INSURA`IC[ C,: U CGS 'A A e:, 1 12 S 7 ,319 N S J9 L y a I IR PO. L, CAR NO DATE T T E"' ,N o' ♦ n EST F 'S, , , L. . , RK ` S }HE 5 ED E DOLLARS v Y M49K5o &J STATE FARM MUIVAIL AUTO INS, CO W, . 1 11 - ' I `*` :TAT' 'ARM CAE CO., CO. - I'% TATE II tIN6Ns, CO., S 10/ 01� 1--- Y A 13928' -7 0 RECEIVED By 771�2-12A Yort! CASH OF V.ORK i IOTAI M STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES G 5l T PRRITED M U.BA ` REPAIR ESTIMATE ,.. wCH; CtAIM.ND. ow•c or xartcriex . ruw•c snc Msrcc•co �,:•rnr/ .� LICENSE INSURED //`� % C 1 r� yI� �'r y— ` �j ` NUMBER ocs< Ci L(• _ �. L� 1+1 l.I 1 -.:21� � 1 f, r J -J ^I P, C- i r TEL. NO �I •� / ? �'. L •1� MANE I YEAR SERIES BODY SinE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SP NEADINGEp. iiCJ+-JO-CI•S'77� 3n r<.I 111 nnwu nwcc DESCRIPTION PARTS ®LIST LABOR XRS. REFIN ISMRSC PAINT { ET RI EM.S -.1^ •.. d ;'. - ! . it — u n. -- • .S /nn,l Lt'z,n: ; PtY'� � .. i1'LI -O. n 2112 " - J V t r' -�� '��•i �J L T-2 F/� 1 C) L TOTAL $'_.I / CLAIM NO, i (i To RITF Rol TO SHOW V IS ALE A APPRAISAL T Stil SERA ;R COST EP IRS RE ALSO. AOPEc. TO SNOW THIS APPRAISAL TO REPAIRER pEFOgf REPAIRS ARE SIANIEO. WE ACCEPT Changes in EstlmatDNs THE REPAIRS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. I AUTHORI2EU THE COMPANY TO MAKE PAYMENT OF 3 h •S TO THIS REP \I SHOP ON MY BEHALF. MSURED'S J w �i. �Y, I SIGNAIURP STATE FARM CLAIM ` (V` REPRESENTATIVE_ REPAIR SHOP. RETVRN THIS ORIGINAL FOR PAYMENT TO CLAIM HIMCE q /KE AT 6260 PtlA yereR_ YeMDlafr Cl 81763 ' {!�:�. r P. a Box sass 4�74 LABOR HRS. kEF. MRS, ^ • 1 TOTA' PER LAO MRS. X $Z MR. f l @RTS f/ Y• y LESS '•�. DISC. S L`��c�F l N "1', .L CL \ SALES TAX $ � (.�� PAINT, MATERIALS, B NET ITEMS S --R-U 3 Ill L TOTAL REPAIR COSTS 4n1 S Z LESS "? 7rs' ;OMJ BETTERMENT $ / L PRIOR DAMAGE 11-- tT a 3 DEDUCTIBLE S'-�� '•,Bp 11175 C/C TOTAL DEDUCTIONS S L�kl .7 G �TNL ..:'kR COMPANYM►Ar Sy l , •.: p a ATO T: n j l •AWNER TO PAY S �j // / :AUTHORIZE &Wil4"et' -4 'oA LABOR RES. TO REPAIR VEHICLE ACCORDING 10 REPAIR,11COST AS ITEMIZED, ALSO, I AGREE TO SHOW THIS APPRAISAL i0 REPAIRER BEFORE REPAIRS ARE STARTED. REF. HIS. NSURED'S ..// / -r TOTAL C� PER 1 a1GNA1URE 1(1 ♦ T.C,' .�,✓ " 1 t '/ -I /• PARTS LABO HIS _�% S M0.. f NE ACCEPT REPA C STS AS IT IZEO, G Tanges IN Estimate B LIST f `(; � l LESS DISC, f IGNATVR RequiF jEstimator's Approval. l� 'I � CT SALES TAX s (�JZ'•�� ` PAINT, MATERIALS, i NET ITEMS f 1 I_f 'HE REPAIRS HAVE BEEN COr.1PLETE6. 1 AUTHORIZE TA COMPANY TO MANE t ' 6TTAL REPAIR COST f 'AT'MENT OF i G.� f TO THIS REP IR sH P ON MY BEHALF. LESS 1-�f RSUAED'S - BETTERMENT f.Jli� IIONAIURE PRIOR DAMAGE f iTA ARM ft AIM l � . IfPREflNTATIYE Lw, DEDUCTIBLE f 19►A!R SAUP: RETURN THIS ORIGINAL FOR PAYMENT TO CLAIM „ . <; •. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS S� • WWi OFFICE AT 5260 Palo Verde Montclair CA 91763 1.1:': coMPANr ro FAr t� —� EIS:' P. 0. Box 2566 17 _ • - REF FrTR "ATP -1 - ' M - 7\70 .q n OWNER TO PAY f AR' P DESCRIPTION ® PARTS L LIBOR R REFIN P STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES 0!6]1.0 PnINTEDm USA. REPAIR ESTIMATE `A DATE OF INSPECTION A $ NSD a- �L�1 -L.,; G�i.�:ll( -.lam - LICENSE' NUMBER % (✓ l/ li �T /' ADDRESS lfi 2•l[; 1 {'1�U I i �I\.t ' �rl . I \�`�K LIT, (.!T ` TEL. NO. I (C 7 — ? C; G• t �j // / :AUTHORIZE &Wil4"et' -4 'oA LABOR RES. TO REPAIR VEHICLE ACCORDING 10 REPAIR,11COST AS ITEMIZED, ALSO, I AGREE TO SHOW THIS APPRAISAL i0 REPAIRER BEFORE REPAIRS ARE STARTED. REF. HIS. NSURED'S ..// / -r TOTAL C� PER 1 a1GNA1URE 1(1 ♦ T.C,' .�,✓ " 1 t '/ -I /• PARTS LABO HIS _�% S M0.. f NE ACCEPT REPA C STS AS IT IZEO, G Tanges IN Estimate B LIST f `(; � l LESS DISC, f IGNATVR RequiF jEstimator's Approval. l� 'I � CT SALES TAX s (�JZ'•�� ` PAINT, MATERIALS, i NET ITEMS f 1 I_f 'HE REPAIRS HAVE BEEN COr.1PLETE6. 1 AUTHORIZE TA COMPANY TO MANE t ' 6TTAL REPAIR COST f 'AT'MENT OF i G.� f TO THIS REP IR sH P ON MY BEHALF. LESS 1-�f RSUAED'S - BETTERMENT f.Jli� IIONAIURE PRIOR DAMAGE f iTA ARM ft AIM l � . IfPREflNTATIYE Lw, DEDUCTIBLE f 19►A!R SAUP: RETURN THIS ORIGINAL FOR PAYMENT TO CLAIM „ . <; •. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS S� • WWi OFFICE AT 5260 Palo Verde Montclair CA 91763 1.1:': coMPANr ro FAr t� —� EIS:' P. 0. Box 2566 17 _ • - REF FrTR "ATP -1 - ' M - 7\70 .q n OWNER TO PAY f AR' P DESCRIPTION ® PARTS L LIBOR R REFIN P PAINT o c/ INA 0,— TIC -1 . .. n 75 P , .; I, v J A-- MIM Si — Fii/ t •S — /�% TOTAL $ $ , ,ru C C ., IfPREflNTATIYE Lw, DEDUCTIBLE f 19►A!R SAUP: RETURN THIS ORIGINAL FOR PAYMENT TO CLAIM „ . <; •. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS S� • WWi OFFICE AT 5260 Palo Verde Montclair CA 91763 1.1:': coMPANr ro FAr t� —� EIS:' P. 0. Box 2566 17 _ • - REF FrTR "ATP -1 - ' M - 7\70 .q n OWNER TO PAY f CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' } DATE: December 16, 1881 TO: City Council and City Manager ��' FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Nap 6051 - Nelson Fred Nelson, developer, is submitting Parcel Map 6051 for final City Council approval. The subject map is located on the north- side of Manzanita between Sacramento and Beryl and divides 1.94 acres into 3 parcels within the R -1 zone. Off -site improvementswill be installed at time of building permit issuance. RECOMMENDATION • It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 6051 and authorizing the City Engineer and City Clerk to sign same. Res ec tfullyV�d, LBH: :jaa Attachment O RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 6051 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6051) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6051, submitted by Fred Nelson and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the north side of Manzanita, between Sacramento and Beryl, being a division of Parcel 3, of Parcel Map 1843, as recorded in Book 23, of Parcel Maps, Page 10 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6051 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 6051 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor • r , U �J PARCEL MAP 6051 iAYCfG Y 0459 /AL Nlt i� 4�A SI s° tt S q o 4 h ao9 � o G d9 � 8 �-n'$ K¢ l On rui °d . s tmr. o°r or FI 91a vr' uo9s o +��E, afT[7Y ,Gt Y �p re rhP Yag9t >[S.anl i`• I m' Lur v[ cw S' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY AIAP� N E e tlfl PM page � ¢I [e rrP roryM X� �[s last, per ..n PO oel a 09oP! Ac , n[r q m`, 6 �M ¢ a'�7�o I xd 6 I g i'CRCCC / J p . nag a�NfiS 4° V m b Lip R�3r U o:. I II I e ° >; AlAWMI, DOW iAYCfG Y 0459 /AL Nlt i� 4�A SI s° tt S q o 4 h ao9 � o G d9 � 8 �-n'$ K¢ l On rui °d . s tmr. o°r or FI 91a vr' uo9s o +��E, afT[7Y ,Gt Y �p re rhP Yag9t >[S.anl i`• I m' Lur v[ cw S' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY AIAP� N E e tlfl PM page • • { u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6085 - Koll -Lyon Associates Koll -Lyon Associates is submitting Parcel Map 6085 for final City Council approval. This map divides 73 acres of land into 4 parcels within the M -2 zone, located on the northeast corner of Fourth and Milliken. All off -site construction has been completed and accepted. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 6085 and authorizing the City Engineer and City Clerk to sign said map. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments �J • RESOLUTION NO. 5I—Kc7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6085 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6085) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6085, submitted by Koll -Lyon Associates and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Milliken and 4th Street, being a division of a portion of the Southwest : of Section 18, T. 1 S., R. 6 W., San Bernardino Meridian was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6085 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Nap Number 6085 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to Present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor y I vL . V R�" r =__"jx �YY♦ .. nee. .0 RngcEL a 6.•• STgEET �• - u •v.0 w MAY 2 1900 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0.6085 << nWILiN . :..2 sou yaO Y•w.rio, Clvll ev�rra"_gp 4 PngCeLS 11.0% xvan - RYCRrPT1ON __ _ O ^r q FLRCEL 2 R C LANG COM%1NY su . ". r+•+ca c..rE -^+ '� 'Clla)�a R,^ra,`,le »lo L1 .•o sunov apR :.o. KOLL LYO1 ......ue.r w., ..... �..� r,a `e2me mor.p C11a�0j". x� Pwmrwo .+ WlLllnly ^.cu .ar.vo SCnlwlo ' cvn Er.rp1•.�eR3 Illp2 Svv gaRn gou.pv/�gO : - .._� ...•�'� •v �^` (lIa: 5A9. 222214 i:syRC� —�GI'_ a ^�I � � E STFIEE.T�• _ ...... 'ten =ec: -� �_ _ _ > ..,m .: �.3';' III .+.• �x k,« 1•zm p ZpQ PARCEL 1 g� In, ,e4 RIRCEI p 8 W . V R�" r =__"jx �YY♦ .. nee. .0 RngcEL a 6.•• STgEET �• - u •v.0 w MAY 2 1900 . :..2 e . W F FLRCEL 2 90r nc j 9 'IRA, .0 RngcEL a 6.•• STgEET �• - u •v.0 w MAY 2 1900 • • n. n 1 XTn TTn nTTn A AKnWTn A STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Site Approval 80-13 Church of Latter Day Saints The Church of Latter Day Saints is submitting the attached bonds and agreement for the construction of off -site improvements for their project located at the southeast corner of Sapphire Street and Highland Avenue. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the bonds and agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully sybmitted, LBH: -:ja Attachments H. RESOLUTION NO. ST) -I W A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR SITE APPROVAL NUMBER 80 -13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on December 16, 1981 by Church of the Latter Day Saints as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Sapphire Street and Highland Avenue. - WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Site Approval No. 80 -13; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • I� Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor • 0 SITE APPROVAL 80 -13 ^ CITY OF RANCI 10 Cl CA�IONCA A �. ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY nlnr N II•: page L CITY OF RAtCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SITE APPROVAL 80 -13 xt10:1 ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, In conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation. hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and cormration of the Presiding Bishop of the church of Jesus Christ of Satter -osy saints hereinafter referred to as the ceveloper. NITNESSETM: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of, Site Approval 80 -13 in accordance with the provisions of the report of the Common Icy Deve ooment Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located southeast corner of Sapphire Street and Highland Avenue and, WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval; NOW, THFREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all • improvements described on page 3 hereof within 9 months from the date hereof. 2. The term of this agreement shall be 9 months , commencing an the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Develoner may request additional time in which to complete the provi. sions of this agreement, in writigg not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. in consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustaents thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provi. sions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Encroachrent permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right - of -way, and the developer shall canduct such work In full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way improvement work reyufred shall be constructed In conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall Include any transitions and /or other Incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. • 17 J IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 7. Hark done within existing streets shalt be diligently pursued to comple- tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred Iron the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re- moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way resulting free work done on the adjacent property or within said right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The Improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond $55.000.00 Material and Labor Bond $27,500.00 • iN WITNE5S HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: '... . ""... " "'" " "•' • ^"""°' °' DEVELOPER BY: DATE: 111 LJ1i FRED A. 9AKF.R, AUMORIZED AGEMI' BY: DATE: HITNI SS: DATE: /,A. ,.•r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation BY: MAYOR ATTEST: , CITY CLERK DATE: L, � ( V CIT. OF RANCdo C0:SCRCCTIC:: :N: 3n11D ESTf ^VE • EYCRn:,C!11!E::T ?EX:I: FEE SCNCD::LE (Attach to "Inspector's Copy ") DATE: 11/10181 PERMIT 10- COHFFTEO FIT d.$tofa,dr. File Reference Site Approval 80 -13 CLt7 Drawing No, S.E.C. Sapphire St 6 Highland NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or paveaent replace- ment JaPasits. LTE:I MANT7T't UNTT INITT rMT $ 5.371.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS est.onD n0 FAITHFUL PERFOSMANCF POND (IOO:) te5.0n0. DO r.. h - %° 41. L. F. ENGINEERINC INSPECTION FEE t 7—AM M P.C.C. InrF only 6" C.F. L. F. MOSL:ICNTATION DOND (CASH) '0- (5200 min' I.. F. 4" IX .c. Sidavn lk S.F. .75 15 418 I" nry ve ,\nnrnnuil S.F. street sn 1 C." lma eed5nb an ink lnent C.Y. Pr ^v cit ien of ShF -,sdc S.F. Ila. rna Sa, wee tons) 1 TON 13 '.. 1 =nn to uno tons) roN n. (,d, W to 9n0 e,, l I TON A f 1,nder trend 5.111 c ^vl 1 117 TnN n no In In P,11h A.C. (tre ch) S.F. I" Mie4 A.e. Overlav S. F. \d bw 77 Adh:et .11ell C.G. to Grade I EA. Ad 4 r \'alone to fr de EA. N1— EA. 4^ r hy' Tr =r� I EA. a e 4roo ur . bU 41256 a u 1n an emova e, amp 1 p 1 1 1 i 1 1 i CONSTRUCTION COST $49,629.00 CONTINGENCY COSTS $ 5.371.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS est.onD n0 FAITHFUL PERFOSMANCF POND (IOO:) te5.0n0. DO [AF,OR AND `ATERIAL DONM (SOS) tp>_SOD nn ENGINEERINC INSPECTION FEE t 7—AM M (FEE SCHEDULE) MOSL:ICNTATION DOND (CASH) '0- � IG • 0 0 • ,r Bond a0109 31 51 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the Ci CouncilV f th Cycc o nche uc morn a, tale of California, and�o�at }or ['�°�he I�rpf ld�sg "i o� Fi y e "'lure "pf esus (hereinafter designated as prancapai') have enen Cerra into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated Novemher 21;�7o g7 1901, and identified as project Site A or val 89 -13 - Southeast Corner of $apv 'r S.reet and Hivhland Avenue is hereby referred to and made a part ereo an . WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal andFederal Insurance Comnanv as surety, areKe3d and firmly bound unto the City o Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City ") , in the penal sum of fifty-five thousand and 00 /100 ------------------------ ------------------------------ Dollars (aoD,VUU.vV 1 aw u money o the United statesr or the payment oiww is sum we 1 and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successora, executors and admini- strators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above hounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the forms of the agreement or to the work or to the spedficotiono. iH WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrement has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on November , ± 1901. PRINCIPAL C� Corrwration of the Presiding Bishon of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter 9av Saints. a Utah Cornoration Sale Fred A. Baker, Authorized A9ent Lill, SURETY FEDM L INSURANC C0'10 1,4Y Norman G. to rnevin "Fact st out Ial East ICi y. Utah 94 Salt Lake [1LY, Utah 8111 C� F Bond a 8089 31 59 LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND WHEREAS, the C't Covpc.1 of the Ci y of Rancho Cucamonga stare of Cali Eoxnia, and PO�a�,. of thy Presld ng Bishop Qf the Cpurcp Qf Jesus (hereinafter designates as pxirc.pax t „a•+e ear .8 •o. ....u..... whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated enu. :< /?•, 1981_1 and identified as project _iae_gpprnont Rn. M Sapphire Street a d Highland Avenue as exeby re err to and ma e a part ereo an , WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the state of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all Contractors, subcontractors, laborers, mat.ri.l.ser, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of swent -seven thousand, five hundred and 001100 Do ars z¢i.�b5m0p -w � , for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or ornts due under the• Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing "on obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein tendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought Upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force end effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such Change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and surety above named, on November y•, 199 J. PRINCIPAL Cornrrati0n of the Presiding 8lshoo of the .. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Oay Saints, a Utah Corooration Sole rise �i�✓ By. 1i,�..iY !4 ,,)r -� Pred A. Baker, Authorized Agent 9 SURETY FEOE0. INSURAII C0'19ANY By: 1 0' Homan u. au a1 tornev-Ic[ .�oa'�6 �yi -7G iG-fr C 447 East Itt Soitp.h vim . • • nTm nc. n A wtnT n nT rn A "nun A STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FRO14: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician 4' 1977 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Agreement and Security and Real ovement Contract and Lien Agreement r rp 6582 - Praver Bros. Investments The subject map located at the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Foohill Blvd. is submitted by Praver Bros. Investments for final City Council approval. This map divides 6.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the C -2 and R -1 zones. woolsworth Nursery is being constructed on Parcel 2. At *ached for your approval are bonds and agreements for the construc- tion of off -site improvements on Hampshire Street and additional improvements on Helms and Foothill Blvd. Also attached is a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of a landscaped median is- land to be installed on Foothill Blvd. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 6582 and accepting the bonds, agreement and Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement for same. Respectfully submitted, IV LBH:7a Attachments Z RESOLUTION NO. Stl- 16q • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PRAYER BROTHERS INVESTMENTS (CHARLES HUGES, OWNER) AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 6582, located at the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill, submitted by Praver Brothers Investments was approved on August 26, 1981; and WHEREAS, Installation of Median Island with landscaping and irrigation established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Charles Huges, Owner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren H. Wasserman, City Clerk n LA Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor I�3 RESOLUTION NO. q0)_ I q�) • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6582, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.6582) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 6582, submitted by Praver Brothers Investments, and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the south- east corner of Helms and Foothill, being a division of the North � of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast ; of Section 10, T. 1. N. was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 26, 1981; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6582 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by Praver Brothers Investments as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and • said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 6582 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D, Schlosser, Mayor d PARCEL MAP 6582 u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title; PM A `. i ; �, <r •,x EwclNr•.rKlNc onrlslov — { r 6m VICINITY ALAI' N page_ n/ E a i cor . �I� irrirr,•'i iar�, �. I ,�� Iln 16, I �I : r ,t`it I • �" i 1 . � -��.� L�'�p�,;,_� >.. �;. + /e i l l r ---,• �.. . � � r tl ' -_. y lOyci I v , r r' '... ll as It I Do �. 3r ti AlACT ,I �. ENO' ��.nnn:a 1 a� n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title; PM A `. i ; �, <r •,x EwclNr•.rKlNc onrlslov — { r 6m VICINITY ALAI' N page_ n/ E a CITY OF RANCHO CoCA11000A • ,IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL PAP NO. 6582 KNOW ALL IIEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, to conformance with the provisions of the Nunicipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and PRAYER DROS RIVECTM$ ereinafter referred to as the Developer. WI VIESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of Parcel Pap Number _(582 in accordance with the Provisions of the report of the City Engineer thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at the southwest corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. and. WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by sain Dev- eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and, WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupas. of securing said approval; NOW, THEREFCRE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: • 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 3 hereof within nine months from the data hereof. as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28. 2. The term of this agreement shall be nine months commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro- visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 0. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right of way, and the Developer shalt conduct such work in full compliance with the re- gulations contained therein. lion - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right of way improvement work required shall be constructed in con - fmmance with approved impmvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety, . 2- i K] - • age 2 .IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple- tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cast and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocation, or re- moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right of way resulting from work done on the adjacent property or within said right of way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Ccpounity Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terns of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond Material and Labor Bond $51,600 $25,800 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: OE�y1;�LOPER e�- — —/,y� BY: ,M1 .� - 1iaY LwLi.M DATE: BY: RJ DATE: —/- WITNESS DATE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation BY: 'MAYOR ATTEST: .CITY CLERK BATE: .rll \r rgra��m��f\n rl .r .. MC�•�k a•y'n- %r/- ei /YI... ' ii...rrrrrr .r III.rI leml r1 nnliL.. r.. n.. •r.... x r.rrrrrrn.,�� m 7 M fOq NOTa qv SEaL Jq sT xMr ry.CC11- k -Cr.0 ^r'�.^000 :. , wY C�a Tnet�f. l Ipu�141a CITY OF RANCHO CtC 1I0::6A CONSTRUCTION X:n ROND ESTI%t TC E%LROACINENT PECIIT FEE SCHEDULE (Attach to "Inspector's Copy ") DATE: 11/18/87 PERMIT V0. COMPUTED BY C G ENGPIEED7NG File Reference PM 6582 CiLy Old.", Nn.s 737 %OTC: Does not include current fee for -[icing pecmiL or pavement replace- ment deposits, CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIKATE TTE4 InVANTTTF I L'%TT VNIT COST 5 AMMMT c P f.. r­4 - R" [, L. F. 6 no 462 P.f,f.. r—h —1, A" C.F. L.F. V.C. 9111, Is2fn 11.) L.F. E" P.e.r. gideua ;k 9 4 S.F. 1-75 5 170 6" Dries Annrnath 1, S.F. 3 610 N" P.I.C. Crnsa Cucoer 733 S.F. 3.40 ?.492 Sl Ic" F[eavazion I C,y, Inpurted Ec6an1ncnt C,y• Prc +o rnU nn of Sul^.mAe S.F. 4 .. fo 1100 to-1 TON A. .Ind - - 0 n inn,) To% r. d nn d s) TI \% arh d.C. r nch S.F. 1" P.,1 0 .). r 0,er l a.• 7 000 s. F. 0.30 1 2.100 Adina'c F r G0. ro CraAn EA. v7 r Ce Ama [ rode 1 1 FA. I It rnr ' el. S n V'Lrer V I FAQ 7q .11 q Pu 11 er SCE EA. c S urn A. 0. Guard ard Panel w000 I 1. F. 25. JG 200 t CONSTRUCTION COST 46.900 CONTINGENCY COSTS efiyp TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS et Ren FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE ROND (100%) 61.600 LABOR AGD tPTERIAL WM (50%) 251800 E%GINEERC2G INSPECTION FEE 2 235.50 (FEE SCHEDULE) N)!.LNENTATIOV RONO (USH) V V 051 10 Pitcn :.ac Card • Ccv^ec No. 9320 .!a rain 19 -90 9829 • 9929 INPROVE:4ENT SECURITY INSTRUMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, For the Project Rno•dn As Parcel H.p 6583 THIS AGREE.. ^]E IT, made and entered into this /mot d y of rc 1981_, by and between herei to rein "Lem he 14 n , _ hereinafter "Borrower^, and .HE CITY RANCHO CU A.NOSGd, CALIFORNIAr hereinafter de "City ", provides as follows: 11 1 T N E S S E T R: HHEREAS, Lender is a financial institution subject to regulation by the state or federal government within the meaning of California Government Code Section 66499(x)(3); and, IMEREAS, from the proceeds of a loan from Lender to Borrower, Lender has an deposit, for the account Of Borrower, the sum of S7),d00.00_ ------ -- ----- two- thirds (2/3) of which shall constitute and b. rx..rred to as "the performance fund^ and the other one -third (1 /3) of which shall constitute and be referred to as the "payment fund "; and, HEEREAS, Borrower has entered into an Agreement, herein- after "the Agreement ", with the City whereby Borrower agrees • to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, dated , , and identified as referring to Projec -' is hereby referred to and made a part hereo ; NON, THEREFORE, in consideration Of the City giving final approval to the Project known as p_.^., aa• and authorizing the recordation of any tract or parcel map pertaining thereto, iznder and Borrower agree: (1) The performance fund is security pledged to the City to insure that Borrower, its heirs, successors, executors and administrators, shall in all thing. stand to and abide by, and will and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions of the Agreement and any altera- tion thereof made as therein provided, on Borrower's part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified and in all respects according to its true and lawful meaning, and to insure that Borrower, its heirs, successors, executors and administrators, shall indemnify and gave harmless City, its officers, agents and employees as stipulated in the Agreement. (2) Lender shall disburse the performance fund to the city in such amounts as the City demands, promptly upon re- ceipt of written demands signed by the City Engineer of the City, and specifying therein that Borrower is in default under the Agreement or this Agreement. (3) In the event City commences legal action to re- cover all or any portion of the performance fund, then the - Cit7 shall be entitled to recover, in addition to the amount Of the performance fund, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees. -1- 051 (4) Lender and Borrower agree that the payment fund is security pledged for the payment of all contractors, sub- contractors, laborers, m.teri.l.aa and other persons em- ployed in the performance of the Agreement and who are referred to in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of D>yisicn 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California for materials furnished or labor performed of any kind, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, and that Lender will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the payment fund, and in case suite is brought will pay, in addition to the payment fund, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees. (5) This Agreement and the payment fund shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corpora- tions entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in aev suit brought upon this Agreement or against the payment fund. (6) No change, extension of time, alteration or addi- tion to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be Performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any wise affect this Agreement or Lender and Borrower's obligations hereunderr and they do hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specification, This Agreement shall become effective upon acceptance by the City and shall remain in full fare. • and effect until such time as the City shall releeae the performance fund and payment fund as hereinafter provided. IN WITNESS WHEREGF, Lender and Borrower have executed this Agreement on the day and year first abo��,v,,''e written //,��..rr LENDER:`^//^f 4µl( F'K BY: S4 pal' Nam (Title) BORROWER: STATE. OF CALIMANIA ocxrr Nanf IYWm :n +M Inr .nA+:e.nn aM Smr. M+wr+III +VMnd Ineu ra meu MrAn__ prrv:demdM -W 11 i', ar: r „+im. f 1.e.. ie mr In MrM Srlre.o.^s_rt; :rl dr nrprn:n rAn e+mnM rM niAin inanmem,+M Ine.n le m, in M rM ryr.m,.M nrnrr+.l iA. .rlFin inYn • m.m .. LMII �I tl:r ..r;.rnxm n.,.:n n.mN, mA wlrmrl' = rApJ is mm rMr mrb rnrywamm ror +n:l iA. ame, pxrnum Y. M h.., 01 lo SEAL mm IMO:\a FACfQEN � In er r rr.l.r:nn nl il. 0.e r.l el nrr.rrnr. � FOIE.._, -sA++E. I Er nY i! FIl]ISS mf A +M mbul r,l. lO Wants wAR 3d - E r1 L J • 4 The Cit; of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby accepts the foregoing Improvement Security Instrument and agrees: (1) Upon final completion and acceptance of the re- quired work, and the performance of all acts specified in the Agreement, City will release any part of the performance fund not claimed by the City in accordance with the above provisions, not needed as security deemed necessary by the City for any guarantee or warranty period or not needed as security for costs and reasonable expenses and fees of the City, including reasonable attorney's fees. (2) Six (6) months after the completion and acceptance of the required work, City will release the payment fund except such part thereof as equals the total of all claims on which an action has been filed and notice thereof given in writing to the City Council of the City. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA, a municipal corporation BY: 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Base Line Road Poet Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 1981, by and [hereinafter referred to as 'Developer'), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation therein- after referred to ae 'City'), provides as fellow.: WHEREAS, the Developer has requested approval by the City o • Ten rat ip. Parcel Hap No. 6583 in accordance with the provisions of the report of the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at the aourbeast corner of Foothill Boulevard end Helm. Avenue ; and, WHEREAS, as a condition of approval for the development, the City requires that a lien be created upon the real property to be developed for construction, at some future date, of median island including landscaping and irrigation on meter on Foothill Boulevard , adjacent to the property to be developed. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install offsite street improvements, including half width Median Island with landscaping and irrigation , in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvd* ments .hall be installed upon and along Foothill Boulevard coneieuous to V 0 2. The installation of said improvements shall be Completed not later than one (1( year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at not expense to the City. 3. In the event the Developer fails or refuses to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all coats of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and Conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: parcels I to 4, Bach inclusive, of Parcel Map 6582, as per sap recorded in Book Pass of Parcel Maps. Records of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino, State of California. • S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes de:cribed above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 37 n 0. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement AS a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortgages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the Provisions of this Agreement, to recover any am which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Developer to redeem the above - described property from the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY' DEVELOPFR: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, • CALIFORNIA, a municipal i corporation my BY. PHILLIP D. SC NLOSEER Mayor V ATTEST: LAUREN M. WASSERMAN City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO On November 3, 1981, before me, the undersigned, a Notary CH ARLE51 J.a HUGHES anddJACQUELYNDM .SHUGHEEPersonally appear be she I Persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed he same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. / &T.44YA w UC 7-1 Pu tc • 3� 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CL'CANINGA CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIMATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE (At[.rth to "Inspercor'a C., ") DATE: 10/11181 PERMIT NO. COMPUTED BY 0 Stole- c File Refercn-n Parcel Mao 6583 CitN Dr..1ng Me, Median Isla d- Foothlll Blvd. ]47 -Feet) NOTE: Does not include current fee for .riling pe[ml[ or pavement replace- ment d .... Ics. WNSTRUCTTON COST ESTIMATE ITEM 4 . TY nN11 UNIT T L. F. P.C. " rb n r RC.F. 721 1. 1. A.C. Mare[m ($100 min) L. I. P.C.'. S. F. r—a)k 6" 6" Drive Ac . S. F. x" P.C.C. Cr.— C[�sa Cure[ S. F. St lee[ Excevat ion I C. Y. ImOO rt etl Emb enkment C.Y. Pr mntfan n( Sub lade 1 B.F. A C. 1 r 1100 tom TON A.C. 1000 1100 tonal TON , to TON TON Pitch A.C. v cM1 31 S.F. .7 A I" TS' a A.C. Overlay t S.F. F.A. Adiust sever C.O. 1. Crade EA. Ad i'.s[ II r Valves to Grade EA. EA. S e 1 EA. B[reo 1 F.A. 0 e e t I 94 L, F, 0.30 308 Fill (I-Ft. Benin S Sell 167 C.Y. 8.00 1336 Landecave, A trrl ation 4U5. S.F. Z.1V 12145 Sc[i in 1 694 0.10 I CONSTRUCTION COST I1,677 CONTINGENCY COSTS 11733 TOIA1. CONSTRLTTION COSTS 24'000 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (1005) LABOR AND MATERIAL BONS (502) E%GINIF.RING INSPECTION PEE (FEE SCHEDULE) MO",, ENTATION BOND (USN) NOTE: Developers Share (502) • $11.000 V' Ll • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 � 1s TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Director Review 81 -24 - To ai or amc��ca Tokai of America has submitted the attached bonds and agreement for the construction of sidewalk, drive approach and an under - sidewalk drain for their project located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the bonds and agreement for Director Review 81 -24 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. Respectfully submitted, LBH: :jaa Attachments ?l1 RESOLUTION NO. 5) -I9I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -24 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on December 16, 1981 by Tokai of America as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Director Review No. 81 -24; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Inprovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor J • • nn DIRECTOR REVIEW 81 -24 9 zi a: a• ya title" rY OF RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA A — /,'dI``\ D.R. ENGINEERING DIVISION 7 VICINITY NI,$, 1� page, CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Director Review 81 -24 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered Into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Tokai of America hereinafter referred to as the Developer. NITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS. pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of, Director Review 81 -24 in accordance With the proVixionx o the report of the Comrunity ve a0ment Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located northeast corner of ]th Street and Utica Avenue and, WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all • Improvements described on page 3 hereof within 9 Months hereof- the date hereof. 2. The term of this agreement shall be 9 months , comnencfng an the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the tern stipulated, unless said tern ,�- - has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional tine in which to complete the provi- sions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shaII have the right at any time to cause said provf - sions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. S. Encroachment permits shall b, obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right - of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non- campliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the Penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way improvement Work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. • n IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 7, Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to conole- tion; the City shall have the right to coanplete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred fron the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re- moval of any component of any irrigation rater system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for reaoval of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way resulting from work done or. the adjacent property or within said right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Conmmnity Developmen t Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval Of roe City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond $9,400,00 Material and L.Wr Bond $4,700.00 • IN WITt:ESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on set forth apposite their signatures'. rr�cuu •aa� r. MOaYNIRIP DEVELOPER ww- TORAI OF AtOBMICA .�.,,..ui ATTEST:_ DATE -J... DATE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation I MAYOR CITY CLERK i OF 3UC::O CCC:C:O:An CONS77CCTION d::0 EOND ESTI:L \TC • ENCBOAC:?'IEST ?MMET, FEE SMIEDCLE (. \[r xh [n "Inspee w r'a Copy "7 DATE: 11/5181 PERMIT NO, CU.4yLTED BY J. Stofa, Jr. File Reference D.R. 81"24 City Drawing No, wh NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing perm[ or pavement rep", ment depost[s. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTLMATE 1TIN OCLMITY TT S f fn -N'•ff F. L.F. P.C. a ', nniv n• C.F. L. F. A.C. Hem feyi0 min) L. F. " �nnrnach S.F. 30 A" V.L.0 p.r.0 A" frnxs fu au S.F. St reer F ian 1 C.Y. Emer [edrEnDanwmen[ C. Y. Preeavatien of .Snb,,de S.F. e Ine I A.C. Invcr 1301) renal TON A.f.. 14M to I Cn cons) TON Oine, SM c M ;ono TON r SON c 1 :'ON P.ich A.C. krcnchl f S.F. 1" 'Fick A.C. Mer law S.F. n ItAde E.\. .Ad•usc Sc. r C.O. to Grade EA. Adluar Vetqr v lees eo Gra e ( EA. 5 r 1'•4c i 5 r n r slcns f \. Ed [ret t as EA. I r ik drain I a, 1 i 1 1 1 1 CONSTRUCTION COST 58.375 CONTINGENCY COSTS 11.1195 TOM CONSTRUCTION COSTS OATH) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SOND (Ift%) <0.400 EABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (SOS) 44 mil ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE a 4711 (FEE SCHEDULE) MOWIENTATION BOND (C1SII) 'D- • Bond No. 03 96 00 Premium: $169.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City Council Of Che City Of Reecho Cucamonga, State of California, and TOIGI OP AMERICA, INC. �hereinaf ter designated as "pnncrpa ) nave entered rota an agreement hereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated Public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 , and identified as project Street rovementa ornar Street and Utica Avenue rs ereby referred to and made a art ereor; and, P WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. ND:Jr THEREFORE we the principal and NATIONAL ONION PIRS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBGRGH, PA. as surety, are a d� firmly uad unto the Ci ey of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City "), in the penal sum of nine A usand four hundred and 00/100 ------------ ------ ----------------- - -- - -- Dollars ( n59 400.00 th 1 awru money o e united States, or t e payment w is sum we 1 and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, succeaso rs, executors and admini- strators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is Such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep end perform the Oovenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein Provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be ta::ed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension Of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifics [ions accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bondr and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, tension of G1 , me al to ra do or addition to the terms of the agreement or extension the work or me the specifications. IN WTTNESS WREPEOF, thin instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on �oveawe Id 1701. r '.I 1. atnt TORAI OF AMERICA, INC. �, ^aOMY „p. �ISM� e/,.IIMA 10TERNATIONAt ICo rw,we «wow^ Byi NtMt.vw4emew ]RIM awt iakuji F dk'� res' enf • NATIOIN�AL ON ON U I O ,g CE COMPANY BPI X10. a AtFOrtiiy -ln- act P. 0. Box 7714 Burbank, Calif. 91510 ? d• Bond No. 03 94 00 Premium: Included in Per BO IJIBOR AND MATERIALM£N BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and TOM or AMERZG. INC. (hereinafter designated as "principal") nave entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , and identified as project Streat Improvements WE CbF�r itn— -_ Street and Utica Avenue , is hereby referred to and made a part erect; an , WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3081) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of four thousand, seven hundred and 00 /100 --------------------------------------- ------------------------------- - - - -Dollars or materials furnished or labor thereon o any kind, or-Tor such tordla under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety well pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount will pay in set forth, and also in case suet is brought upon reasonable bond will pay in addition fees, including to the face amount thereof, casts and reasonable expenses and fees, y enforci reasonable attorney's fees, incurred and by City in successfully courtly en tto be such as csobligation, to be awarded and faxed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to :he benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, than this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remaen in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any' such change, extension, alteration or addition. -- IN WITNESS WHEPCOF, this instru,nent has been duly executed by the Principal and surety above named, on November 30, , 198 1 ru, r ' TORAI OF AMBRTCi, INC. tj wR04Y „R. RISM4^ xAJIMA INTEBAATIONAL, iNC. MuhnIllild •ttx �InnreN� �JM ..non _ Takuj Vfunak l GS a n} NATIONAL UNION ItIB COMPAMY • err 1�. a A tornayTict P. O. Box 7714 Burbank, Calif. 91510 r] .I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician c�GMggc } 'n Q� 0 � z UG > SUBJECT: Acce tance of Real Pro ert Im rovement Contract and Lien Agreement for Minor Development Review 817-16 - Foseco 1977 Approval has been given to Foseco, Inc., located at 7th Street and the future extention of Santa Anita Avenue for the addition of 2 offices to existing building. As a condition for this minor development review, an offer to dedi- cate Santa Anita Avenue (33' wide) and a lien agreement for its future construction is required. A document for the offer to dedicate Santa Anita Avenue has been executed. The lien agreement to provide the future construction of Santa Anita Avenue is attached for your approval. RECOM1MENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolu- tion and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the lien agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LB H:1 jaa Attachments 14 • RESOLUTION NO. 51 -17� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FOSECO, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Minor Development Review No. 81 -36, located on Santa Anita at 7th Street, submitted by Foseco, Inc. was approved on November 17, 1981; and WHEREAS, Installation of Off -Site Improvements established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Foseco, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk • Phillip D, Schlosser, Mayor H� r� u • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81-36 rrrlppp���[�� /u /czrn wvecn i_. j, _I_.'•_ i LY 1' M� �iT Po'1' •Poi li ' ' . ��:'J_I�I� ;..• 'Iz oP.0 1. Iv .oK !a, p_ . `Ol l l' flip, I I I II`I • CITY OF RANCHO CUCA \IONCA 81 -34 ENGINEERING DIVISION b NVICINITY n'lAr nn �f page s. 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY and WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Rase Line Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 25th day of Novesber , 1981, by and between Foseco, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as 'Developer') , and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for industrial development, the City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements, including but on limited to curb, gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk and ate in c lights, adjacent to the property to be developed; and, WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvement, until a later date, as determined by the City; and, WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install off- site street improvements, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk and street lights, in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements• shall be installed upon and along Santa Anita Avenue, contiguous to the subject property. ,4/7 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed not later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to the City. 3. In the event the Developer fails or refuses to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to More the repayment to City Of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improve- ments upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer doe. by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamongp, • County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: That Portion of Lot. 92 and 93, Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, page 20, records of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the West line of Section 17, Township 1 South, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, and the North line of Lot 97; thence Easterly along the North line of Lot 97, a distance of 661.99 feet, more or less, to the West lint Of the land conveyed to the Cucamonga Land Company, by Deed recorded April 1, 1966, in Book 6600, page 347, Official Records; thence Southerly along the West line of the land conveyed to the Cucamonga Land Company, to a point 100 feet South of the Northerly line of said Lot 92; thence • West and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot 92 to the West line of said Section 17; thence Northerly along said section line to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING • THEREFROM the West 70 feet as conveyed to the San Bernar- dino County Flood Control District, by Deed recorded January 1, 1942, in Book 1.509, page 411, official Records. L�� S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes• described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. ]. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to • mortgages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Developer to redeem the above- described property from the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the part!.. hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, j CALIFORNrA, a municipal corporotion ce P1esident a d Secretary BY: PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER Assistant Secretary Mayor Ai TEST: • LAUREN M. WASSERMAN City Clerk 0 u \J nrmv nc D n wTnvn ni TO A sXnXTO A STAFF REPORT 1"0 , �`' °I DATE: December 16, 1981 v j 1977 TO; City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Acceptance of North Town Phase II Street and Drainage Improvements Phase II of the North Town Street and Drainage improvements, Community Development Block Grant Case 4110 -05105 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the City Council approve acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety. RECOMMENDATION Council accept as complete the North Town Phase II street and drainage improvements, Community Development Block Grant 4110 -05105 and adopt a resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release performance bonds. Respectfully submir�ted, U r/-) • RESOLUTION NO. $I - Iri3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN PHASE II STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of street and drainage improvements on Feron Boulevard, Reid Avenue and Main Street have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor v 1 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEY RECORDED MAIL TO CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Bax-807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: North Town Phase II 1. TK. full name and address of the undersigned owner is: • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9330 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, 3. On the 16th day of December 1981, there was cor.: plated on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for "NORTH TOW PNAEE lI STREET aND OUTRAGE IMPROVENENIS" 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was Schram and Walter. Conrracmrc, Inc. S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: NORTH TOWN PHASE II STREET AND DRAINAGE I: @ROVLME \TS The street address of said property is: WA DATED: , 19 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owndr • BY: Na (Title$ J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubba, city Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds Tract 9430 - located at the Northwest corner of Haven and Wilson OWNER: R. L. Sievers S Sons, Inc. 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue Suite 8 Buena Park, California 90620 i 101i Release of Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $102,000.00 1977 The road improvements for Tract No. 9430 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. P.M. 6228 - located on the north side of La Vine Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues OWNER: Leo Lamb P. 0. Box 104 Upland, California 91786 Release of Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $ 34,000.00 The road improvements for Parcel Map No. 6228 have been constructed in actor with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. Tract 9472 - located on the north side of 19th Street west of Haven Avenue LBH:bc OWNER: Boulevard Development 777 South Main Street, Suite 106 Orange, California Acceptance of Reduced Bonds as follows: Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $68,000.00 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $34,000.00 Release of Bonds as follows: Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $231,000.00 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $116,000.00 67 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED NAIL TO CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Post Office BOx'807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract N0. 9430 • 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is; CITY of RANCHO CUCANONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 16th day Of Bareabar , 1981 , there was com- pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for Tract No. 9430 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- prnvement is a whole was R. L. 8leven aad Son., Inc. S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: screet Improvements for Tract No. 9430 The street address of said property is: DATED: , 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONC,A, a municipal corporation, Owner • BY: _ (Marc; • (Title) RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TV: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Rox•807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF CW1PLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of Which interest or estate is: Parcel Map 6326 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 16rhday of Beceober , 1981, there was eon - pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for Parcel Map 6226 1. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was Leo Leeb S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of Ban Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Srrea6 Improveeenrs far Pareel Nap 6228 The street address of said property is: DATED: , 19 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner • BY: (Na, e) (Title) 3: -1- :0 .• 0 i vaa a yr L%� Ia aiv vUUe VAVLIUn MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 1981 TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer U. SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BONDS FOR NUBANK INTERNATIONAL, INC. i I Work for the following tract has been completed and the guarantee bonds are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release to Nubank International Inc., 9014 W. Olympic Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California, 90211, Attention: Paul K. Coombs - President. Amount Purpose/ Tract No. Lot No. of Bonds Case No. Location 9421 38 E 150 70 -20 -401 Subdivision Signs and 1000 70 -20 -400 Sales Office located 2000 70 -20 -401 on Lot 38 - Tract 9421 Thank you for your assistance; if you have any questions regarding this bond release, please call. GWR:kp CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 1981 TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance FROM: Gary W, Richards, Code Enforcement Officer /J� SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BONDS FOR MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Work for the following tract has been completed and the guarantee bonds are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release to Marlborough Development Corporation, 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550, Los Angeles, California, 90067, Attention: Shirley Larsen - Engineering Coordinator. 507 49 0 • Amount Purpose/ Tract No. Lot No. of Bond Case No. Location 9422 43 & 46 $1000 70 -20 -400 Subdivision Signs, Sales $4000 70 -20 -401 Office, and design center located on lots 43 & 46 - Tract 9422 Thank you for your assistance; if you have any questions regarding this bond release, please call. GWR:kp 507 49 0 • l: `J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM December 10, 1981 To: City Council - City Manager From: Finance DireI -r — Subject: Reserves for Contingency 101 1977 As to Council's direction, the following information, with regards to a reserve for contingency equal to the amount of additional revenue sharing over and above that amount that was originally budgeted,that amount being $57,433 , is submitted for Council's persual. Currently our General Fund Budget Revenue is at 27.82% received. Our General Fund expenditures are 43.74%. Simply stated in dollars is that the City has spent $929,059.00 more than it has taken in. Also, to consider with this is the fact that this is the slow part of the year for revenue income, and our weakened position should be somewhat Improved in January with the receipt of our first property tax install- ment, and again in March when Fanchise fees are due and payable. Therefore, I cannot recommend setting up a contingency in reserve from the General Fund. Of course, there are the reserves, the only real source of available money to set up a reserve for contingency. However, they are becoming depleted as far as cash is concerned. The reserve status is as follows: Current Changes in economic conditions $341,100 Reserve for City Facilities Acquisition 500,000 Reserve for Loss of Bailout Funds 170,840 Park Land Acquisition / Development 1,006,000 Loan to Redevelopment Agency 70,000 Total Available $2,087,940 Reserves secured by Council action: Park Land Acquisition / Development $ 606,000 Loan to Redevelopment Agency 70,000 Loan to Rancho Cucamonga Chamber 6,000 Transfer to General Fund to offset Reduction in Motor Vehicle in Lieu 128,809 Total designated $ 810,809 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Reserves for Contingency Memo - Page two Potential Requests of Council for Further Use of Reserves: Parkland Acquisition / Development $ 400,000 City Hall Architect 500,000 Additional Loan to Redevelopment Agency 70,000 Change in Economic Conditions (Will be needed to support General Fund if economy stays flat.) 307,131 Total Future $1,277,131 Total $2,087,940 Currently, reserves are supporting three funds that are in a deficit situation from a cash flow standpoint. (Grants, F.A.U. and Assessment Districts). These funds are reimbursable, it always after the fact. This amount is $241,685.00. With all this happening, it becomes necessary to make a conservation recommendation. Should any funds be necessary on a contingency basis, I would recommend they be drawn against the changes lneconomic conditions portion of the reserves. However, I would caution Council to be very perusal in its judgement of the use of reserves for things other than already discussed. The year is not even half over and the availability of these reserves may become a critical issue later. v C/ is • • 7�LLtpp.. ,:: COPYR. 5'[<s �! pr lr r.rl^l.r.r..11 npirr pW.rAir lit -I.r M.i1••rrrrr oRrr rr 5' i -, A WILIC 1ilON FOR ALCOHOLIC eiVERAGF LICFN$GS) 1 1. MEl51 OF LICEN$EI$) F FIIE NO _ F to: ol," m el Almhell< Bererove Comrol _ FEE NO. Ban Berardino O OFF SALE BE T& YLN3 .,'$evame"IO,eoACSSeu _�__ G GEOCRAPHI:AL . . .. CCDE .595 zh. and... i hoeby."I - for D Dore Vc-s- decrbed IF fell..r t a timed 'L. NAME!$i Of APPLICANT(S) •`' a/JJ Or d. If Premnea 1-led, 7. Are P-a-, Lode al L „eme :h- 191721 uy L.mnr= Yee' e. Ma W9 Aderee f I dif ear, m- !base uad $rrr<r '!e'i }�.`"'°-' ?K' 9. Xa.e you ••n been can.rzred of a leleny+ 10 11- yev < violated any ,l the pror, he al ... .T, a r. IS. Be.erege Carrel Al or revulorlom of he Drpanmem per. h,a Ie:nin0 ra IM1<Aer = .', 11. t"I.ra YES ” omner re near 9 or 10 ae a. oit-Frar nrcb Shall be deemed pot of r'I, opIko - 12. AppM1mel agree (al tk,t o"y .... , emplay.d " n .ole :, rred pr<mi ,II h— all rbe paal,M1wuam N o lieeer•e, and Ibl rear 1e .dl ro "1 ol. ar came .,'Pram to b" molmed_o eel F, Pm.ve,r IF rFe Alcoho6r Ie.r• Cg Trral AO. .; a sure of cAUrovrvlA ceaap IF Sun Berl ;iao oar. 12/3/81 IA. All IC-11 :.�' 19, Lomuoa Nrrmbm ead 9nn C ly o "d Ep Code __ 1fi9J0 -05th ft,.r Kr7 ilD ^,rim Cn, nnp_H1 r'z1_C e^ Do Nal R' III, 'nett the Ling I a• 1), .,,,a, I'rr Only Amdrd IJ Remrd ^d noun, CI Fnl Pm•n. pp ASCd32 - -- � _. _. COPIES MAILED R's;iYa'aAT;,l' .. r ' ❑brr..ra4 Fn 0 .._... Roida ._,._._.. 12/9/81 ._. - - CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY �tfr5 -say)/ 6wabryVgr,M��yf.,odkl 9alctxa roemr • IN9TRUCTI6NS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to wexamal properly must be filed not later than 190 days after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property most be filed not later than 1 year after the "curante. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident, 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915x) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No. I E C a I V i 0 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION NOV 3 0 1981 AN 7,Sf9(n,ll,1Y,1,2i3,4,5,6 1! Name of Claimant Age of Claimant (if natural person) Pgic Home Address of Claimant City and State Home Telephone Number Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent How did DAMAGE or INJURY'oecur? Give full particulars. F%lay��y ��5E -ball z.l a C'..0 -YCa AC1c:l � -l:v,m 46 did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day: 11C�i =.th tiiF 2. :7 C1-i 7 "L•C+'t S .�i•.O.m Where did CAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of is sheet, where appropriate, give street names and address and measurements from � landmarks: !-OU l=Lc `,>t.. t"rl t.mc,iL rl\ pr:;�ta7 a \\ Eiticl What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim cadsed the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage, if known: What DAMAGE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Cive full extent of injuries or damages claimed: -j• ,1t 'l ht rF I lr 0" .) rat- -1-e "etc iU 1 L '\ nt_ '400- � t,.; What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of u,ji,ry or damage as of dale of presentation of this claim, giving basis of computation: *Note - Assistant surgeon's fee is 2p% of sureeons. f of �fhe patient is in need of surgical repair of ruptured medial collateralF .ligament of the knee. This will cost:approximately $1500, for the surgeon, and approx. $305. for the assistant surgeon. 3 to 5 days in hospital at approx. $200. per day. ii6,' 1 ," _ ,rM • -SEE PACE 2 (O%Tlt) •IMIS CLAIM MUST EE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDF w`' A. R. Ellingson, M.D. Orthopaedic Surgeon, 1230 E. Arrow Hwy., Upland, CA Insurance payments received, if any, and names of Insurance Company: ENpenditures made on account of accident or injury: (Date — Item) (Amount) !Name and address of Witnesses, Doctors and nospnals: ., Il.n.j . k READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets. including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers of distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B'• location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A -1•• and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by "B -1" and the point of impact by '•X.•• NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS I L SIDEWALK R ..�...:. -. .... .. .. CUR PARKWAY L_ 7 SIDEWALK FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS L Signature of Claimant or person filing on his behalf givingI Typed Name: _ I Date relationship to Claimant: ..., .. .q� NOTE, Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Cal, Pen. Code Sec. 71). ' CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (GOV. CODE SEC. 915a)."`�,`Fl "( y IEEEIV9D CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOV 30 1981 • CO -ED SLO -PITCH SOFTBALL AM PM INTER LEAGUE %800100411213 INIS League play begins: Sunda , October 11, 1981 ! �Cl League play ends: Sunday, December 20, 1981 There will be a playoff game on Sunday, January 10, 1982 at 6:00 p.m., Vineyard Park, Citrus L.L. Field between the lst place team in the National League and the 1st place team in the American League. (A championship team trophy will be awarded.) The following rules will be used for all league play and shall take precedence over the basic rule -book if they are in conflict. A. Game Time 1. Games will be scheduled to play at Vineyard Park, Citrus L.L. Field. The time of games will be at 10:00, 11:15 a.m., 12:30, 1:45, 3:00 and 4:15 p.m. There will not be any grace time. No infield practice will be given before or in between game times. 2. The time limit will be one hour and ten minutes or seven innings, which ever occurs first. 3. When a team is twenty (20) runs ahead after 4 innings, the game will be called. • 4. If the score is tied at the end of one hour and ten minutes, it will be continued, inning by inning until a winner is determined. 5. Last team listed will be home team. It will be the responsibility of each manager to let the umpire know who is the home team. The winning team's manager is responsible to call the Community Services Department and let the Recreation Supervisor (Karen Matcham, 980 -2634) know who won the game. It is the responsi- bility of each manager to check with the umpire at the start of the game and to check with the scorekeeper periodically. B. Team 1. A roster of 20 players will be turned in with an entry fee of $190.00 before Friday, Seltnmber 25, 1981. Open roster until final roster is due on Monday, October 26, 19812 at 5:00 p.m. 2. A team shall consist of ten (10) players on the field at one time. However, a game maybe played without forfeit with (9) rostered players, five players must be women. 3. Ir a player is ejected from a game, he or she Will Not be elig- ible to participate in the next scheduled league game. If he or she does participate, the game will be forfeited. 4. Team roster cannot exceed nineteen (19) players (plus a playing manager.) 5. Home team will be required to provide a new DeBeer 212 softball for each game. Failure to do so will result in a forfeit. Vis- itors will supply a playable ball for the 2nd ball. • ^. Ci . �- . ndr n:.aaa :Tl 6. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide medical insurance for I adult,sports leagues. r.N alcoholic beverages are allowed in our ball parks. We are • ".Iaskirig you to refrain from bringing any alcohol to the games. _ Also'we would like for your spectators to keep it away from the ball field as well. (City Park Ordinance 12.04.010, sub section B.) Teams and spectators breaking the law can cause a team to forfeit a game or to be expelled from the league. 8. Batting order: Players must bat in alternating order by sex. For example: Woman, Man, Woman, Man ect. Exception when there are only nine (9) players, two (2) women must bat in consecutive order. As many as sixteen (16) players may bat. 9. The entry fee of $190.00 covers the cost of trophies for first, second and third place teams, and twenty first and second indi- vidual trophies, one official and one scorekeeper. 10. Because the field is a little league field and 190 -200 foot fence, it is an out when a man hits the ball over the fence. . It is a homerun when a women hits it over the fence. C. Protested Games 1. it is the manager's respons�.bility to notify the umpire and the scorekeeper before the next pitch that the game is under protest. All protested games must be in writing and submitted with a check for $10.00 into the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 • Arrow Highway, R.C., to Harem Matcham (Recreation Supervisor), no later than 24 hours after the game to be under consideration as a protested game. D. Forfeits 1, A team. not having nine (9) eligible players, five(5) of them women on the field past the scheduled game time, will forfeit the game. E. Line Up 1. Once a player has been removed from the game, he or she is still. eligible to qo back into the game as lonq as they remain in thc= batting line up. Once they are pulled out of the game they c,�nnnt. return. 2. Therc must be a woman at either shortstop or first base. F. Plaver's Eligibility 1, All players names must be on their team roster. A player may be dropped from the roster at any time. 2. All players must be able to prove that they are on their teams • final roster by supplying a driver's license upon request. 3. Players must be at least 16 years of age or older. 3t`.: Q G. Equipment CITY f RANCHO CUCONONGA • 1. shirts and shoes are required. NOY 30 1981 2. No metal cleats �► 8i9�y��llj12i1i2is�4i5i6 H. General Playing-Pules 1. Pitching: Distance will be 96 feet. The ball must arch higher than the batter's head. The ball muse not exceed a height of more than 12 feet above the ground. 2. If the batter attempts to hi,, an illegal delivery, the pitched ball will be considered as legal. 3. No bunting or chop hits are allowed. Penalty% Hatter is out. q. No base stealing. If a runner advances illegally to the next base, he is declared out. If the runner doesn't touch the next base and is returning to his legal base, he or she can be forced out if the throw reaches the base first. 5. Base runner may lead off as Soon as the ball has left the pitcher's hand in a legal delivery. 6. For scoring, for safety reasons, you must touch the official home plate, not the extensicn. .• 7. sliding is allowed. S. Only captains or managers con confer with umpires. 9, No infield practice before Cr in between games. 0 10. No alcoholic beverages on p;•)rk grounds. 11. At the beginning of each inning or when a pitcher relieves another, no more than 3 balls may be delivered to the catcher or any other teammate. Reminder: 20 -:ran roster will close on Monday, October 26, by95 %00Ap,mm. Please bring it to the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, Highway, R.C. For further ifformation or any qucsti.ons pertaining to this league, pL mse call ¢aren Matcham, 080 -2631. office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday. lL'._ ERNEST M. FREEDLE, 7R., M.D., F.A.CS. MPLAND (ORTHOPAEDIC -41MICAL (OROUP ABEL RAYMOND ELLINGSON. M.D. ^ •' ` "° JOHN SANTANTELLO. M. D. "'O CAST ARROW HIGHWAY KENNETH C. LAY, M.D.. F.A,CS. UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 01705 Tnveoe. Tu .05-722. TO VIHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ODLIN,ATF or TR[ AAUU RAH OF OITHwA[D=c lutam IILIOW OITNt.....A.ACAMYT OF OIR.... WM[OMt November 30, 1981 Re: Kim Barrows The above named patient is currently under my care in this office for injury sustained to her left leg. The patient is in need of immediate surgical repair of a ruptured medial collateral ligament. This surgery has been scheduled to be done at San Antonio Community Hospital on December 2, 1981. ARE: j CITY OF N�NUM CUCAVO,%A ADMINISTRAT!GN As NOV 3 0 198 ?�I�nd11�1112�9141516 Very since3;ely yours, • v �N A. R. Ellingson M.D. Pi City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department Accident Report Ileport must be submitted to Director of Community Services within 24 hours) Date of Reporc92 Date of Injury �^, 9_ e^n Jr ..•, !..ii .;'l Name of Injured T— i,..•._ -90 R.t 6W.3 Address `%o %(o -... Phone of 7 a.r7 .. . t. Parent's Name (if minor) ' LOCATION where accident occurred �nh.r > r�•% / !'•-r� /�� % {. r, ._,� lan,�',i r,• r.,..:,,wr p(, Cfi- . //��wr NATURE of injury /00 -1,J WHAT was disposition of unjured person and at whose direction? 1 ' Name of Physician or Hospital administering treatment (if applicable) - Witnesses: Name Address Phone el Was activity being supervised at time of injury? Yes w" No _ If no. where was supervisor? •'" Signed Classification /.e /+ r) f e ,rr ^ 7, /1" 5 �1 ✓ -1 ,..., ^^` ...Date` _'Y,��;ea'II /IV.../"/. �/� 'Y` '4' v `.',yJy7,y'• ::�. . v. / % �' 1. ; . _ El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beadle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: The City Council and Redevelopment Agency will conclude their public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan at the December 16 meeting. It is anticipated that at this meeting they will be able to take the necessary action to consider adoption of the Resolutions and findings and to have first reading on the approving Ordinance. Enclosed with this report includes: o Staff recommendations on revisions to the Draft Redevelopment Plan o Comments and responses to the Environmental Impact Report o Accompanying Resolutions requiring action by both the City Council and Redevelopment Agency o Adopting Ordinance Since the last City Council meeting, Staff has met with interested property owners to discuss the aspects of Redevelopment and specifically Y the City intends to have the Redevelopment Plan work for their Com- munity. Also, a question and answer brochure in both English and Spanish has been prepared for public distribution. Once the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency have closed the public hearing, it will be necessary to consider taking action on all the Reso- lutions and adopting Ordinances for the Redevelopment Plan and Agency. Also, the meeting should be continued to the date of December 23 in order to have second reading of the adopting Ordinance. �:k Public Hearing on Draft Redevelopment Plan City Council Agenda December 16, 1981 Page 2 RECOP4AENDATION: Upon completion of the public hearing, it is recom- mend City council and Redevelopment Agency consider adoption on the attached Resolutions and Ordinance. Respectfully so itted, �A AICP Community Development Director JL:TJB:jr Attachments 6 lJ CJ MSI make presentatmo Lore. 0 <. Rending of Written Com municnlinns in Fnvnr of the Proposed Redevelopment Pln0 MAYOR: "Will the City Clerk pieese rend Any written communications received and not yet rend into the records since the December 2, 1981, opening of the Joint Public Henning regarding the proposed Redevelopment .. .. Plan." CITY CLERK: City Clerk reads written communications, it any. � r' Revised 12/10/81 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING- , OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1. Continuation. of Joint Public Hearing 41AYOR: "On December 21 1981, the Joint Public Hearing of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City If Rancho Cucammoge on the proposed Redevelopment . Ilan and the Onft Environmental impact Report for the Rancha iedeveloomenl Project was opened. This is e contir.annce of that Joint Public Hearing. 1 now declare the City Council Public Hearing open." AGENCY CHAIRMAN: 9 now declare the Redevelopment Agency Public Hearing open." 2. Introduction of Staff MAYOR: Before 1 ask those who wish to speak to come forward, 1 would like to request Mr. Lauren Wasserman, Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency to introduce the Agency staff members wIm will respond to questions Ot EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mr. Wasserman introduces Agency Counsel, consultants, and app,opriate staff members. J. staff plcl mtstinn ' D ERECUTB F. DIRECTOR: rYraa i of prescntntion of the Draft Redevcinv,reM Plun ". MSI make presentatmo Lore. 0 <. Rending of Written Com municnlinns in Fnvnr of the Proposed Redevelopment Pln0 MAYOR: "Will the City Clerk pieese rend Any written communications received and not yet rend into the records since the December 2, 1981, opening of the Joint Public Henning regarding the proposed Redevelopment .. .. Plan." CITY CLERK: City Clerk reads written communications, it any. � r' S. Oral Statements bV Persons Wishing to Speak in Favor of the Proposed Redevelopment • Plan .. .._....._ MAYOR: "AR persons wishing to comment or ask any Questions regarding toe proposed Redevelopment Plan or Environmental Impact Report will now have an Opportunity to speak. SPEAKERS: g. Closing of the Joint Public Hearin¢ MAYOR: m now declare the City Council Public Hearing closed." AGENCY CHAIRMAN: m now declare the Redevelopment Agency Public Hearing closed." 7. Staff Presentation of Proposed .Agency end Council Actions AGENCY CHAIRMAN "Will the Staff now give a brief explanation of the actions to be considered tonight by the Agency and the City Council." 1 1 � s S. Questions and Discussions by the Members of` the eJJoint Bcdv MAYOR: "Do any Martha" of either the City Council /Redevelopment Agency have Questions regarding the proposed Redevelopment Plan or Environmental Impact Report "" 9. Remmmendstion of the Redevelopment Agency EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "1 have for your consideration Resolution No. a Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approving and declaring that the provision of low -nnd moderate- income housing outmdo the. Rancho Redevelopment Project Area is of benefit to the Project Area ". AGENCY CHAIRMAN: "Do i have a motion?' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR; "I have for your consideration Resolution to. , e Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project ". AGENCY CHAIRMAN: "Do l have Vmolion ?" -7r L EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: m have for your consideration Resolution No.I1 A_ Pl -1 y_' --,- e Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approving the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project and recommending adoption of said Redevelopment Ft. by the City Council." AGENCY CHAIRMAN: "Do 1 have a motion ?" Adjourns after completing business. ACTION BY COUNCIL Ill. CITY MANAGER: "1 have far the Council's consideration Resolution No. fJ -ne finding and declaring that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area is of henefil to the /projeet Are.." I recommend adoption of ResalutiotH fhe• ". • MAYOR: "DO I have a Notion ?" CVTY MANAGER: % have for the Council's consideration Resolution No, certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project" I recommend edopton of Resolution MAYOR: "Do 1 have a Notion ?" 11. Council gives First Reading to the Ordinance adapting the Redevelopment Plan "Aq 12. Council proceeds with the remainder of the Agenda. Lauren M. Wasserman Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 N "O .:3 0 OX PAIN i. -NGUL VN e L GP.ING.. C. L4'.w NIA SxEIW (".) x. f - 1x0. fYN CITY OI II C[ iw.SO CMICARY YLN.wO 1. 11 .1 IJD. f SUN C v u10w Nl. 9i]CI lii alf - : »[ LOS ANGELES OF.10[ GIS EOUTN ILOWEP ST..1111E IY LOS ANGELE3.4LIFOP N IA 30011 Re: Draft Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Lauren: Pursuant to the Agency's request, we have reviewed the proposed draft Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelop- ment Project, outlined below are our recommendations re- garding revisions to the Redevelopment Plan which we would suggest be incorporated into the plan prior to its consideration by the members of the Redevelopment Agency at their meeting of December 16, 1981: 1. Section 102, Section 102 of the Redevelopment Plan correctly states that the redevelopment processes are available to eliminate economic blight, including the elimination of conditions which have led to underutilization or disuse of land, or a lack of private investment within the redevelop- 40 • LAW OIIIC 63 OF BEST, BEST 6[ KRIEGER -, Yc .[' c SSOO OD..N.E STPEET il,. P. O.fIOF Was cV•c RIVERSIDE. CALI FOFNIA 92502 TELEPHONE (714) 806 -1450 December 8, 1981 ,.IN.....,I aN.N.N.Y wlxN.a LPISOZ.. xYCi.un:`n.u..+.n Lauren M. Wasserman Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 N "O .:3 0 OX PAIN i. -NGUL VN e L GP.ING.. C. L4'.w NIA SxEIW (".) x. f - 1x0. fYN CITY OI II C[ iw.SO CMICARY YLN.wO 1. 11 .1 IJD. f SUN C v u10w Nl. 9i]CI lii alf - : »[ LOS ANGELES OF.10[ GIS EOUTN ILOWEP ST..1111E IY LOS ANGELE3.4LIFOP N IA 30011 Re: Draft Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Lauren: Pursuant to the Agency's request, we have reviewed the proposed draft Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelop- ment Project, outlined below are our recommendations re- garding revisions to the Redevelopment Plan which we would suggest be incorporated into the plan prior to its consideration by the members of the Redevelopment Agency at their meeting of December 16, 1981: 1. Section 102, Section 102 of the Redevelopment Plan correctly states that the redevelopment processes are available to eliminate economic blight, including the elimination of conditions which have led to underutilization or disuse of land, or a lack of private investment within the redevelop- 40 • . ,,ww ornces or t' 'BEST. BEF S KRIEGER ' Lauren M. Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Two • 0 ment project area. In Regus v. City of Baldwin Park (1977) 70 Cal. App. 968, 977 -78 (citing Sweetwater Valley Civic Association v, City of National City (1976) 18 Cal. 3d 270, 277), however, the court cautioned that "it is not sufficient merely to show that an area is not being put to its optimum use, whether the land is more valuable for other uses." We would therefore recommend that Section 102 of the Redevelop- ment Plan be revised to explicitly reference Health & Safety Code Section 33032 in order to clearly establish the basis for the Agency's determination that blight exists within Rancho Cucamonga's redevelopment project area. This section of the Community Redevelopment Law permits the Agency to make a finding of economic blight if there are inadequate public improvements which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment or if the redevelopment project area is characterizied by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of the existence of lots or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water. We would propose for your consideration the following revision to the second paragraph of Section 102: Rancho Cuca menga is experiencing major physical deterrents to growth, due in particular, to the existence of in- adecuate flood control public improvements, as well as a lack of public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. At the present time, the Rancho Redevelopment Project area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of a pre- valence of depreciated values, impaired - �..w ornccs or "- SEST.13 EST & KRIEGER Lauren M. Wasserman • December 8, 1981 -` Page Three investments, and social and economic maladjustment due in part to the existence of lots or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water. It is anticipated that this Redevelopment Plan can eliminate the existing conditions causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Rancho Redevelopment Project area to the extent that it will no longer constitute a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community. These conditions cannot reasonably be ex- pected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting along without redevelopment. We would recommend that the plan expressly reference the assessment of conditions report. 2. Section 103 (Definitions). Section 103 of the Redevelopment Plan contains • definitions of low and moderate income and very low income. As you know, these terms are referred to throughout both the Redevelopment Plan and the Community Redevelopment Law. We would recommend that the definitions of low or moderate income and very low income be revised to include references to those sections of the California Health & Safety Code which presently define low or moderate income and very low income. The following revisions would accomplish thin recommendation: "Low or moderate Income" means persons and families whose income does no*_ exceed 120; of the area median income as defined b California Health & Safety 0�3ection , "Very Low Income" means persons and families whose income do not exceed the qualifying limits for very low income families as defined in California • f-13 T. BEST & KRIEGER Lauren. M. Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Four Health & Safety Code Section 50105 and established pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, or in the event such federal standards become obsolete, persons and families whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the media^, income, as estimated by the Agency from time to time, for the area in which the nousing units in question are located. 3. Section 201 ( Acquisition of Real Provertv). The Agency is authorized by California Health & Safety Code Sections 33342 and 33391(b) to acquire by condemnation all or part of the real property in the project area and we would therefore recommend that paragraph 1 of Section 201 be revised as follows: • Such acquisition does not include the en- ployment of condemnation nor eminent domain proceedings, pursuant to Sections 33342 and geeeiea 33391(b) of thea'ritornia Health & Safety Code, except as provided for in Section 211 of this redevelopment plan. 11 4. Section 211 (Participation Priorities) Section 211 generally references rules which the Agency has promulgated for owner and tenant participation. Since the Agency has formally adopted owner participation rules for the Rancho Redevelopment Project by resolution adopted November 4, 1981, we would recommend that Section 211 of the Redevelopment Plan be revised to expressly incorporate by reference the adopted owner participation rules. For example, the first sentence of paragraph 2 of Section 211 could be footnoted as follows: 7Y9 NW OFFICES OF :n .BEST. BEST & KRIEGER Lauren M. Wasserman . December 8, 1981 Page Five 1. Owner participation rules adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Resolution No. adopted on November 4, 1981. 5. Section 232 (Public Improvements), Section 232 of the Redevelopment Plan provides that the Agency is authorized to install and construct public improvements and public utilities necessary to carry out the plan. Health & Safety Code Section 33445 provides for redevelopment plans adopted after October 1, 1976, that acquisition of property and installation or construction of each facility shall be provided for in the Redevelopment Plan. In addition, Health & Safety Code Section 33445 permits the Agency, with the consent of the City Council, to pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of in- • stallation and construction of any building, facility, structure, or other improvement, which is publicly owned, only if the City Council makes the following findings: (1) That such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located; an d (2) That no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community. Although Health & Safety Code Section 33445 undoubtedly contemplates that the City Council may make these findings after the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and prior to the Agency's decision to expend funds for such public improve- ments, we would recommend that Section 232 be revised to include language essentially addressing the findings required by 33445 for financing the public improvements listed. 77 . OFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEGER Lauren M. Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Six Section 232 as revised would read as follows: The Agency is authorized by California Health & Safety Code Section 33445 to pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure, or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without the redevelopment project area necessary to cam out this plan. It is contemplated that acn uisition of property and the installation and construction of the following buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements may be undertaken as part of this redevelopment plan: (insert each facility for which acquisition of property and installation or construction is contemplated by the Redevelopment Plan). • The Agency and the City have determined that such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and that no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community of Rancho Cucamonga. 6, Sections 254 (Development by Agency) and 331 (Confo ,.ance With This Plan). We have discussed generally the second paragraph. of Section 254 and the first paragraph of Section 331 which impose requirements that all development plans (whether public or private) be submitted to the Agency for approval and review. Staff has indicated that whereas development plans should most certainly conform to the requirements of the Plan, it may not be necessary to require that all development plans be submitted to the Agency for approval and review, • LAW OFFICES or BEST. BEST 6 KRIEGER Lauren M. Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Seven We would recommend for your consideration the following revision to Section 254 which would accomplish this result: The Agency shall require that develop- _ rent plans (whether public or private) conform to the requirements of this Plan, City's General Plan and zoning ordinance as well as all other local requirements formulated pursuant to this Plan. In order to insure that the requirements of this plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary rea wire that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval. All development must con- form to this plan and all applicable federal, state and local laws as amended from time to time, and must receive the approval of appropriate reviewing public • agencies. Section 331 should be similarly revised as follows: All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No real property shall be developed, re- habilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan except in conformance with the provisions of this Plan. In order to insure that the reeuirements oa, t. �s an are carr1ec out. the A er.c7 may as it eer, necessary require t.at development p ans w et er � is or pHvate s a . .e suomitEe to it Tor review ana aoProva 7. Section 311 (Conformance to City's General Plan. This section of the draft plan incorporates by reference several exhibits regarding the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in particular the land use • ` • LAW OFFICES OF BEST. BEST & KRIEGER • Lauren Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Eight .. _. ._ .. .. ._ 10 element of the General Plan. More generally, California Health & Safety Code Section 33331 provides that "every Redevelopment Plan shall conform to the General Plan insofar as the latter applies to the project area." California Health & Safety Code Section 33302 goes on to provide that the City's General Plan must otherwise conform to the requirements of California Government Code Section 65302. In light of the recent court decision in Camp v. Mendecino (1981) 123 Cal. App. 3d 334, which indicates the seriousness with which courts are inclined to review General Plan con- sistency requirements, we believe it would be prudent to provide some additional text in Section 311 which addresses other elements of the General Plan if only to state that the Redevelopment Plan is generally in conformity with those elements and is intended to enhance implementation of the City's adopted General Plan, This would mean including some brief textual reference in Section 311 to all nine mandatory elements of the City's General Plan including the lard use, circulation, housing, conservation, open spacl, seismic safety, noise, scenic highway and safety elements. 8. Section 401 (Twenty Percent Requirement). Section 401 of the Redevelopment Plan provides that not less than 207 of all tax increment allocated to the Agency shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income. We have discussed with staff the fact that these funds may be used inside or outside the project area if the Agency otherwise complies with the requirements of Health & Safety Code Section 33334.2. We have recommended Char hcth tho .redevelopment Agency and the 4AW Of11CC. Oe BEST. BEST 6 KRIEGER Lauren Wasserman • December 3, 1981 Page Nine City Council adopt a resolution finding that the use of these funds inside or outside the project area will be of benefit to the project. Since such a resolution is to be adopted by both the City Council and the Agency, we would recommend that Section 401 be revised to include the following additional sentences: The Agency has determined that it may use these funds inside or outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project area. The Agency and the City have found that such use will be of benefit to the Rancho Redevelopment Project and that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project area will be of benefit to the project. 9. Section 313 (Residential Uses). • Although Section 313 of the Plan states that the land designated for residential uses in the project area is vacant at the present time, the Plan goes on to provide that "development of residential uses in the project area will go forward with a minimum of Agency involvement...." However, if the Agency elects to take advantage of the authority in Section 33334.2 of the Health & Safety Code (requiring the use of 20 °; of the tax increment revenues from redevelopment for low and moderate income housing) we would recommend that some summary discussion of the needs of the community for low and moderate income housing should be added to Section 313. For example, a brief discussion could be limited to references to appropriate sections of the housing element of the City's General Plan. We also note in this regard that Health & Safety Code Section 33333(c) requires the Redevelopment Plan to show by diagram and in • SAW OFFIc El OF BEST.SEST & KRIEGER • Lauren Wasserman December 8, 1981 Page Ten general terms the approximate number of dwelling units within the Redevelopment Project area. We would also recommend, therefore, that Section 313 be revised to clarify the approximate number of dwelling units within the Redevelopment Project area. 10. Section. 505 (Financing Limitations). We would recommend that the last paragraph of Section 505 be revised as follows in order to bring it into consistency with the Agency's finding that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project area will be of benefit to the Rancho Redevelopment Project: The Agency may use such tax funds inside the Pro- ject Area or, outside the Project Area. • The City Council has found that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. In addition, the Project Area includes property suitable for low and moderate income housing. Yours sincerely, JEB:bjs cc! Municipal Services, Inc. 0 John E. Brown of Best, Best & Krieger MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. MEMORANDUM • TO: LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM: ABE DE DIOS DATE: ,DECEMBER 10, 1981 SUBJECT: Revisions of the Draft Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Based upon input received from the Agency Staff and Council, it is recommended that the following revisions to the Draft Redevelopment Plan be incorporated prior to adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the RedvelopmenL Agency at its regularly scheduled meeting on December 16, 1981: Section 102 Revise 2nd paragraph: . Rancho Cucamonga is experiencing major physical deterrents to growth, due in particular, to the existence of inadequate flood control public improvements, as well as a lack of public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. At the present time, the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of a prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social and economic maladjustment due in part to the existence of losts or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water. It is anticipated that this Redevelopment Plan can eliminate the existing conditions causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area to the extent that it will no longer constitute a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the economy. These conditions cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone without redevelopment. (See Assessment of Conditions Report). Section 103 (Definitions) Revise: "Low or Moderate Income" means persons and families whose income does not exceed 120% of the area median income as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 50093. "Very Low Income" means persons and families whose income do not exceed the qualifying limits for very low income families as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105 and established pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, or in -1- a the event such federal standards become obsolete, persons and families whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the median income, as estimated by the Agency from time to time, for the area in which the housing units in question are located.. Section 201 Revise paragraph 1: Such acquisition does not include the employment of condemnation nor eminent domain proceedings, pursuant to Sections 33342 and Sections 33391 (b) of the California Health and Safety Code, except as provided for in Sections 211 of this Redevelopment Plan. Section 211 Revise first sentence of paragraph 2 to be footnoted eat 1 Owner participation rules adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Resolution No. RA9 - 189 adopted on November 4, 1981. Section 232 Revise first paragraph: The Agency is authorized by California Health and Safety Code Section 33445 to pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure, or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without the Redevelopment Project Area necessary to carry out this plan. It is contemplated that acquisition of property and the installation and construction of the following buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements may be undertaken as part of this Redevelopment Plan: (insert each facility for which acquisition of property and installation or construction is comtemplated by the Redevelopment Plan). The Agency and the City have determined that such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and that no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 232 Add: 15. Fire Protection Facilities Due to the expected increase in population and development, four proposed fire stations are to be located within the Project Area; one within the Victoria Plan Community, one within the Terra Vista Planned Community and two within the Industrial Specific Plan." -2- Q . y.. Section 254 • Revise 2nd paragraph: The Agency shall require that development plans (whether public or private) conform to the requirements of this Plan, City's General Plan and zoning ordinance as well as all other local requirements formulated pursuant to this plan. In order to insure that the requirements of this plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval. All development must conform to this plan and all applicable federal, state and local laws as amended from time to time, and must receive the approval of appropriate reviewing public agencies. Section 301 Change "will" to "may" Section 311 Revise 2nd paragraph: The proposed land uses as described in the following sections conform to the General Plan and also conform to existing specific and Community Plans which have been adopted for certain portions of the Project Area. (See Exhibit 2 for General Plan and Proposed Land Uses.) The Redevelopment Plan's main purpose is to faciitate the provision of needed public improvements and thereby encourages development of underutilized areas by providing feasible financing mechanisms. All of the proposed redevelopment activities conform to the General Plan and more specifically, conform to all elements of the General Plan which include: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, seismic safety, noise, community design (includes scenic highways) and safety elements. All elements in the General Plan contain obiectives for achieving established goals, the implementation of which will be enhanced by the Redevelopment Plan. Section 313 Revise: " .. It is anticipated that the development of residential uses, approximately 17,800 units, in the Project Area will go forward .. . Section 331 Revise: All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No real properly shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan except in conformance with the provisions of this Plan. In order to insure that the requirements of this Plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval. • r. . Section 334 Revise: 11... Shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. In order to insure that the requirements of this Plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval." Section 339 Delete Section 411 Add: The Agency has determined that it may use these funds inside or outside the Rancho Redevlopment Project Area. The Agency end the City have found that such use will be of benefit to the Rancho Redevlopment Project and that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area will be of benefit to the project. Section 505 • Revise last paragraph: The Agency may use such tax funds inside the Project Area or, outside the Project Area. The City Council has found that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. In addition, the Project Area includes property suitable for low and moderate income housing. AD /KJ /dr is -4- � . L1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 (g) of the California Health and Safety Code requires that not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Redevelopment Agency shall be used by the Redevelopment Agency for purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate - income housing unless the Redevelopment Agency finds that the provision of low and moderate income outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area would be of benefit to the Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project is to revitalize blighted areas and promote redevel- opment activities for the establishment of new residential, commercial, and industrial uses. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and declares that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment OroJect Area is of benefit to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 2: The Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: 19 Lauren M. Wasserman, Secretary Phillip D. Schlosser, Chairman s RESOLUTION NO. POS-1 -1,3 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have consented to a joint public hearing for consideration of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the adoption of a Redevelopment Project requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Public Hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project on November 10, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency must consider the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project prior to adopting the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. • NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: 4 SECTION 1: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project. SECTION 2: The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren T1. Wasserman, Secretary Phillip D. Schlosser, Chairman q1? RESOLUTION NO. P J 4 ) - � y A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PROPOSED • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF SAID REDE- VELOPMENT PLAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had directed that the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project be transmitted to the Planning Commission, appropriate entities, and the City Council for their consideration, as required by California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1981 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission approved its report and recommendation on said Redevelopment Plan and found said Redevelopment Plan to conform to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has complied with all re- quirements for public participation and has held a Joint Public Hearing with the City Council pursuant to Section 33355 of the California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has received written and oral testimony concerning said Redevelopment Plan and the Rancho Re- development Project and has duly considered all such testimony. • NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevel- opment Project and recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed Redevelopment Plan as amended for the Rancho Redevelopment Project attached hereto. SECTION 2: The Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the adoption of this resoluticn. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Chairman Lauren M. Wasserman, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW- AND MODERATE - INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 (g) of the California Health and Safety Code requires that not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Redevelopment Agency shall be used by the Redevel- opment Agency for purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate- income housing unless the Redevelopment Agency finds that the provision of low and moderate income outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area would be of benefit to the Redevel- opment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project is to revitalize blighted areas and promote redevelopment activities for the establishment of new residential, commercial, and industrial uses. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and declares that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area is of benefit to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOP ":ED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: 9 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. G ) ) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have consented to a joint public hearing for consideration of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the adoption of a Redevelopment Project requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Public Hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project on November 10, 1981; and WHEREAS, this Council must consider the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project prior to adopting the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: . SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby cert'ifies the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project. SECTION 'L: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Oetermination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserc+an, City Clerk Phillip O. Schlosser, Mayor lJ ORDINANCE IG (- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as the "Agency ", has formulated and prepared the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, herein- after referred to as the "Redevelopment Plan "; and WHEREAS, the Planning Cz)mmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga submitted its report and recommendation finding the said proposed Redevel- opment Plan to be in conformity with the General Plan and recommending aoproval of said proposed Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency has adopted rules governing participation and rules for reasonable reentry preferences to property owners, operators of businesses and tenants in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency has adopted a Relocation Method which is to be extended to all persons who may be caused to be displaced resulting from Agency acquisition of certain property; and • WHEREAS, the Agency submitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as the "City Council ", said proposed Redevelopment Plan; and 0 WHEREAS, the Agency has submitted the Report to City Council accompanying the Redevelopment Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, that Report describes conditions of blight existing within the Project Area; and WHEREAS, after due notice, a Joint Public Hearing has been held by the Agency and the City Council; and WHEREAS, all actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public agencies; and WHEREAS, after said joint public hearing, the Agency approved said Redevelopment Plan and recommended adoption of said Redevelopment Plan to the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 7� Ordinance No. Page 2 SECTION 1: The purposes and intent of the City Council with • respect to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area hereinafter referred to as the "Project Area" are: (a) To eliminate and prevent the spread of physical blight and deterioration by promoting and encouraging the re- vitalization or redevelopment of currently deteriorating or underutilized areas within the Project Area. (b) To encourage new development within the Project Area to provide additional residential housing at affordable prices, and affordable financing terms. (c) To encourage development of office, industrial, com- mercial and permanent uses within the Project Area to reinforce, strengthen and complement other devel- opments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) To provide for construction which in turn will provide short -term and long -term employment opportunities for local residents. (e) To mitigate the major flood hazards by providing im- provements to the existing flood control channels. SECTION 2: The Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment • Project is hereby approved and adopted and designated as the official Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area, and is incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: (a) The Project Area is a blighted area for the reasons described in the Report to the City Council accompanying the Redevelopment Plan, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.; (b) The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. in the interests of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare; (c) The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible; (d) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; (e) The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan will promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.; 7� Ordinance No. Page 3 (f) The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the . Redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired as required by law; (g) The Agency has a feasible method for the relocation of families and persons who are temporarily or permanently displaced from facilities in the Project Area; (h) There are or are being provided in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and com-nercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. (i) Inclusion of any land, buildings, or improvements which are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the area of which they are a part; that any such area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purposes of obtaining the allocation • of tax increment revenues from such area pursuant to Health and Safety Code, Section 33670, without other substantial justification for its inclusion. (j) The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area cannot be reasonably expected to be accomp- lished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. 1 SECTION 4: The City Council is satisfied permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to such displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the time of their displacement. No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary, and otherwise standard dwellings. The Agency shall not displace such person or family until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. ,7 Ordinance No. Page 4 SECTION 5: The Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area provides for the expenditure of money by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in carrying out the Redevelopment Plan, and authorizes the City to financially assist the Agency by way of loans, grants, or other financial assistance. The City Council hereby provides that such financial assistance to the Agency shall be made from time to time as the City Council shall determine to be necessary, and that all such financial assistance shall be deemed to be loans to the Agency based on terms to be established by an agreement between the City and Agency, unless the City Council shall provide in specific cases that such assistance shall be treated other than as a loan. SECTION 6: In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved and adopted, it is found and determined that certain official actions must be taken by the City Council with reference, among other things, to changes in zoning, the location and relocation of sewer and water mains and other public facilities and other public action, and accordingly, the City Council hereby: (a) Declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceedings necessary to be carried out by the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan; and (b) Requests the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga having . administrative responsibilities for the City like- wise to cooperate to such end and to excerise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 7: The City Council finds that pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the California health and Safety Code, the use of tax revenues received by the Redevelopment Agency outside of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area for purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate - income housing for persons and families of low or moderate income will benefit the Rancho Redevelopment Project. SECTION 8: The City Council is convinced that the effect of tax increment financing will not cause a severe financial burden or detriment on any taxing agency deriving revenues from the Pijject Area. SECTION 9: All written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan hereby are overruled. SECTION 10: The City Clerk hereby is directed to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Agency, and the Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. �5 Ordinance No. Page 5 SECTION 11: The City Clerk hereby is directed to record with • the County Recorder of San Bernardino County a description of the land within the Project Area and a statement that the proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. The Agency hereby is directed to effectuate recordation in compliance with the provisions of Section 27295 of the Government Code to the extent applicable. SECTION 12: The Community Development Department through the Buildina and Safety Division is hereby directed for a period of two years after the effective date of this ordinance to advise all applicants for building permits within the Project Area that the site for which a building permit is sought for the construction of buildings or for other improvements is within a Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 13: The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded pursuant to Section 33373 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, a copy of this Ordinance and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Rancho Redevelopment Project to the Auditor and Tax Assessor of the County of San Bernardino; to the officer or officers performing the functions of auditor or assessor for any taxing agencies which, in levying or collecting its taxis, do not use the County Assessment Roll or do not collect its taxes through the County; to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which, in levying or collecting its taxes, do not use the County Assessment Roll or do not collect its taxes through the County; to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which levies taxes • upon any property in the Rancho Redevelopment Project and to the State Board of Equalization. Such documents shall be transmitted as promptly as practicable following the adoption of this Ordinance, but in any event, such documents shall be transmitted within 30 days following the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 14: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily RRepoort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n0 tario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of , 198. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor i ATTEST: Lauren M, Wasserman, City Clerk 15t/n 1] Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 2, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO 87 -01 - change of zone from R -1 -8500 Ingle Family Residential 8500 sq. ft. lots) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential/ Planned Development) and the total development of 72 condo- miniums on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202- 171 -42. ABSTRACT: The proposal before the Council tonight is for a total planned development of 72 condominiums on 5.71 acres of land. In order to approve the proposal, the City Council will need to approve the zone change from R -1 -8500 to R -3 /PD and issue a Negative Declara- tion. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 28, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above described project and approved the related Tract Map with Conditions, as attached, and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration and Zone Change. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report of October 28, 1981, which fully describes the project. The project as proposed is consistent with all related City Ordinances and Standards. The proposed density of 13.6 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre). No adverse environmental impacts are antic- ipated as a result of this project. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. Also, no opposition was voiced against the project at the Planning Commission hearing. q7 Environmental Assessment /PD 81 -01 City Council Agenda December 2, 1981 Page Two RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 81 -01 for the above described project_ through the adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development • JL:CJ:jr Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of October 28, 1981 • Planning Commission Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance 0 �r7> ORDINANCE NO. �/ J • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 171 -42 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET AT RAMONA AVENUE FROM R -1 -8500 TO R- 3 /P.0. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: following: SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel Number 202 - 171 -42, approximately 5.71 acres in size and generally located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue, is hereby changed from R -1 -8500 (single family residential - 8500 square foot lots) to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple - family residential /planned development). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dailv Report, a newspaper of general circulation Published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of December, 1981. AYES: NOES: 0 ABSENT: cr 7n G J 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CONTRACTOR'S OFFICES AND YARDS AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE FREEWAY ABSTRACT: This report discusses two matters which have arisen unforeseen regarding conditions on development within the Industrial Specific Plan area. In order to address these unforeseen considerations, the Specific Plan should be amended to provide for building contractors with vehicular storage in other areas and to reduce the landscape setback requirements adjacent to railroad spur rights of way in the Heavy Industrial area. The recommendations in this report have been proposed by the Industrial Committee and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: Recently, two matters have arisen regarding development stan- dards within the Industrial Specific Plan. These matters were unforeseen at the time of the development of the Industrial Specific Plan. However, with minor modifications of the standards dealing with these matters, the Industrial Specific Plan can be made to address the concerns. One item is the inherent similarities in the existing definitions between "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" and "Building Contractor's Services ". The Council may recall that the purpose of "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" is to provide for the location of storage yard facilities for heavy equipment in an unscreened manner. This use has been shown in the Heavy Industrial category of Subarea 15 east of Devore Freeway. The purpose of "Building Contractor's Services" is to provide for building contractor's uses including their administrative function as well as the storage of equipment and materials. Recently a grading contractor proposed to locate their administrative offices and storage area on Lucas Ranch Road, just north of 4th Street, however the Industrial Specific Plan would allow this use only east of the Devore Freeway in the Heavy Industrial area. The proposed site design has the storage area screened from the view by the offices and other additional screening. The use is appropriate for the General Industrial category, especially in Subarea 5, and therefore could be considered acceptable under the requirements of the Subarea. Industrial Specific Plan Amendment City Council Agenda December 16, 1981 • Page 2 The Council should consider amending the title and definitions of "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" and "Building Contractor's Services" to more clearly define the difference in activities and to amend the land use sum- mary in order to provide for Building Contractor's Offices and Yards in Sub- areas 4 and 5 in order to assure compatibility with the adjacent park categories and to assure protection of the view along 4th Street. The other matter which was not given consideration in the Industrial Specific Plan was the appropriate landscape setback adjacent to a rail spur which runs parallel to a public street. This situation has arisen regarding a proposal to locate a rail spur running parallel adjacent to 7th Street, east of Devore. The problem with this occurs when determining the appropriate landscape setback. The Council may recall that under the Industrial Specific Plan, the landscape setback along 7th Street is 35' from the ultimate face of curb. When combined with the required railroad easement of 30', the property owner is required to have a total overall setback of 65' fromthe ultimate face of curb. The overall setback requirement puts a more onerous burden on the property owner. The landscape setback is more than necessary in order to achieve proper spacing between the buildings and the street frontages and in order to achieve appro- priate screening. It would be appropriate to modify the landscape setback in this Subarea along 7th Street from 35' to 20' where adjacent to a railroad • spur right -of -way provided that the landscaping is designed in such a way to help screen the loading activity. The Industrial Committee has recommended that this change be considered. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on both of these changes at their meeting of November 25, 1981. They approved a Resolution which recom- mends amending the Industrial Specific Plan as indicated and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that should the City Council concur with these changes in the Industrial Specific Plan, they approve the attached Resolution amending the Industrial Specific Plan. Res ectful lyt su emit _ _�c I� 1�—� JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:TJS:jr Attachments: Summary of Land Uses by Subarea City Council Resolution • Initial Study, Part I Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -141 )n r RESOLUTION NO. % -/c 11� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CON- TRACTOR'S SERVICES AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE FREE'dAY WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did recommend amending the Industrial Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Specific Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga amends the Industrial Specific Plan as follows: SECTION 1: The land use definitions be amended as follows: "Building Contractor's Storage Yard: Activities include the maintenance and outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and out- door storage of building materials in an unscreened manner." "Building Contractor's Office and Yards: Activities typically include offices and storage of equipment, materials, and /or vehicles for contractors who are in- volved in trades involving construction activities in- cluding, but not limited to plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services." SECTION 2: That the "Summary of Land Use by Subarea" be amended as shown in attached Exhibit "A" SECTION 3: That within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan, the following special consideration be added: "Where a rail service spur is necessary adjacent to 7th Street frontage the landscape setback may be maintained at a distance no less than 20' from the ultimate face of curb extending to the rail service right -of -way. Landscaping within this area shall be designed in order to help screen the loading activities ". AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the en- vironment and therefore recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. I T • 16 TABLE III -1 EXIMIT SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA e PFPM1TPn I IQ= M nom.:..: +:.. USE TYPES SUBAREAS MANUFACTURING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 77 101112q 31an 516 Custom light.._.—�.�_' . ...._... _ ,...._..... �:,.,,.:;..,, a• o e o o• a • e e o 0 0 � '--::: ----_..._._'...."�. 0 9 0 e 0 0 0• "' • o•• �� o O _Medium ... ?'Ili"II IMR.CT,N=AVY.INCUSTRIA.L C ❑ C o ❑ • O a o • o o O eav _ WHOLESALE. STORAGE DISTRIBUTION Light Heavv o o e o e• o e o• o• n w 0 0 COMMERCIAL _Administrative and Office -- - .. ❑ G ❑ o o ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ _ Agricultural Supplies and Services `"- " -' o 0 o " " o --' :- Care '•— � -�' s • p 0 p _Animal Automotive Fleet Storage "� ""'"" "'" "" - - - — - _ ._ ._Automotive Rental " "" " -�� -- Automotive/ Light Truck RepairMinor'_...�._, o o e C ❑ ❑ ❑ - •- ❑ 0 ❑ _ -_. ❑-_ ':Automotive / Truck Repair-Major _`:'-^ o e e C ❑ C o` - a❑ a o C" ,:,_, Automotive Sales' - _ o - o ❑ ❑ - .._. . Automotive Service Station ; "`•"_-�• C - ❑ ❑ - `� M. l ❑ ❑ ,. .... Buildinq Contractors OFFICES AND YARDS ._ e v O — ❑ ❑ ❑ C C _Build Caintenanc SERVICE YARDS 0 = a o o e Building Building Maintenance Services - ' O- Building Supplies and Sales•`-• -"' "' —' • e e • e o o 0 - " Business Supply Retail Sales and Services - p ❑ p ,, u 7 ❑ p p0 ❑ C ❑ 0 C ' Business Su- ppoS Services e - o e o o• e o 0 0 0 ' ' Communication Services "' - '_`- " "'_"`•-�. o 0 0 - 0 9 o C C e o 0 0 Convenience Sales and Services � �-"'- vice p 0 p e o p C 0 0 0 0❑ 0 - Eating and Drinking Establishments " "-'""' ❑ .� ❑ ❑ ❑ d ❑ _ ❑ ❑ c ��❑ _ ❑ Entertainment �" - ��" "`� "'-"° • o w e o o e• • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extensive Impact Commercial- '-- " "'- ` "-"'° - - C C C C ❑ C ❑ _ Fast Food ._...._.._�._..�,... _ .. - ❑ Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services C Food and Beverage Sales � C ❑ • p C ❑ e 0 - une Funeral and Crematory Services "' "' " "� • " ❑ C C ❑ C C -- C ❑ ❑ C ❑ ❑ ❑ ..., Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals -` ❑ ' Hotel /Motel ""' ' � ❑ C C -, ., -,= _ ° .. Laundry Services "----.. "`.._..,...�_._. 0 0 o e 0 0 _- Medical / Health Care Services-- '"'"'" ^''--' ❑ O o o 0 0 0 - .. . Prsonal Services 71 o ii e ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ e ' _ Petroleum Products Storage ' ❑ : ❑ ❑ C C ❑° '•� Professional Services 1] C1 C • . . Recreation Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ o ❑ 0 ❑ C ° Repair Services o o _; a •• 0 0 0 O -' Scrap Operation 0 0❑ o ,I _CIVIC Aeminnstrahve Civic Services o Cultural • 0 0 0 • e o 0 0 0 Extensive Impact Utility Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ J C O - _ Public Assembly Public Salety and Utility Services ...Rcliaious ❑ - ] ❑ -% ❑ ❑ ❑ _ `' ❑ -. Assembly -- - - t, •C : -' _ " ❑ ❑ ❑ '40 -,-mark^d U;es no' perm!Ied, .j, ^.? 'I RESOLUTION NO. 81 -141 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOH:4ENDI7IG AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CON- TRACTOR'S OFFICES AND YARDS AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Specific Plan; and WHEREAS,-the Planning Commission seeks to improve the Industrial Specific Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recce ^ends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the Industrial Specific Plan be amended as follows: SECTION 1: The land use definitions be amended as follows: "Building Contractor's Storage Yard: Activities include the e of lar maintenance and outdoor storagge construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and out -door storaae of building materials in an unscreened manner." • lding Contractor's Offices and Yards: Activities typically include offices and storage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractors who are in the trades involving construction activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. SECTION 2: That the "Summary of Land Use By Subarea" be amended as snown in attached Exhibit "A ". SECTION 3: That within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan, the following special consideration be added: "Where a rail service spur is necessary adjacent to 7th Street frontage the landscape setback may be maintained at a distant^ no less than 20' from the ultimate face of curb extending to the rail service right -of -way. Landscaping within this area shall be designed in order to help screen the loading activities ". APD OF. IT FU' +'!�LR RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that tni•, ar•en;,ent will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the envirnnront and therofore recon- r:onds issuance of a Negative Declaration. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1961. PLANNING CCI'MISSIO'I OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a • LJ :wi Lo. at -ia Page 2 I, JACK: LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning COICmission held on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CTIMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel, Dahl, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS; None ASSENT: CoMTISSIONERS: None )6r . • CITY OF RANCHO CUCA>tONCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT IilERMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviro =.ental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects reauiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) day=_ before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Nagy -ative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: Amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan _ APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHO::E OF PERSON TO BE CO,%TTACTED COLICEPIr;YNG THIS PROJECT: —Tim J. Rendla. ion;nn Dl,� WC-ATIO:: OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A_^J ASSESSOR PA.,CEL NO.1 LIST OTHER PER:•IITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDrP,�L AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: • I -I + )O6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: a the industrial Specific Plan to ea 0 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENrAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOIL•1ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIKALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): N/A Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? x- 2 J . WTLL TTITS PROJ—CT: YES NO _, X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ____ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ ,,(_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flaanables or explosives? E=xplanation of any YES answers above: IMPORT?.N'T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CCRTIFICATIO74: I hereby certifv that the statements furnishec above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and infor.._tion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie_. I further understand tha t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by, the '4:velopmenc Review Corti ttec. Date Navnmbor 17 IQ81 Signatu Title ceninr Olanner x�l� . 0 • nrmv nt n . %Tn n: 1n a %XnwTn A STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd E. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Selection of Financial Consultant for Assessment District 79 -1 • g�-,5 ;; This item was continued from the December 2 meeting to allow the Council to review a proposal from Miller 6 Schroder Municipals, Inc. and to modify the termination clause in the Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates agreement. The revised agreement is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the selection of Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates as financial consultants for Assessment ' District 79 -1 and authorize the Mayor to execute contract. Respectfully sub itted, LBH:j Attachments to / Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates • MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS November 24, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Baseline Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer Re: Financial Consultant Services 6th Street Industrial Area Assessment District No. 79 -1 - Dear Mr. Hubbs: • Pursuant to your request, Fieldman, Rolapp 6 Associates and Hadie- Jensen are pleased to submit this joint letter proposal for municipal financial services to be performed in conjunction with the financing of the proposed 6th Street Industrial Area, Assessment District No. 79 -1 ( "Project "). We understand that the Project involves grading, clearing and grubbing, asphalt concrete paving, aggregate base and storm drains including acquisitions of all right -of -way and easements, together with appurtenances; the assessment pro- ceedings will be conducted in accordance with the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and the issuance of bonds repre- senting unpaid assessments will be in accordance with the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Our firms have extensive exper'.ence in handling the aforementioned method of financing. We offer to assist you in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to you the research, statistical and consultant staffs of the Fieldman, Rolapp 5 Associates organization and of the Kadie- Jensen organization to such extent as may be necessary and helpful. Mr. William L. Fieldman, Mr. Lawrence G. Rolapp, and Mr. Carl Hadie will be directly responsible for providing financial consultant services to you. • 2061 Buei nose Center Drive, Buite 203 • Irvine. California 92715 • (714) 732.2781 • City of Rancho Cucamo nga Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Two Our services can be divided into two phases. The first phase would be concerned with the financial planning and all other necessary analyses, public meetings, workshops, con- ferences and hearings required up to and including the con- firmation of assessments. The second phase would be concerned with furnishing financial consultant services to be performed in conjunction with the marketing of the bonds representing unpaid assessments. SERVICES: General: We agree to provide financial consultant services in connection with any and all City financing requirements as they pertain to the Project. PHASE I • 1. Preliminary Survey We will confer with your City Council, City Engineer and Staff, Bond Counsel and Consulting Engineers, for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a coordi- nated plan to finance the Project. Included in the survey will be an analysis of the merits of offering the bonds at sealed competitive bids versus a negotiated sale. 2. Attendance at Public Meetings /Workshops We will be available to meet with affected property owners to explain the effects of any proposed financing. 3. Consultation /Advice Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consulta- tion and advice. {Pork Sessions and Seminars • We will be available to conduct and /or participate in work sessions and seminars which may be held to discuss the Project and methods of financing. Municipal FinancM Consultants City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Three Public Hearings We shall attend all public hearings required by the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and shall participate in such hearings to the extent deemed necessary. PHASE II We will perform the following additional services in conjunction with the marketing bonds issued pursuant to the 1913/1915 Improvement Acts. A. Municipal Bond Market • Furnish the City with information concerning current municipal bond market conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing, including' maturity schedules, funds, covenants, prior redemption • schedules and other details which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and therefore marketable at the lowest possible interest rate. H. Negotiated /Competitive Sale At the direction of the City either negotiate a sale of the contemplated bonds or, assist the City in calling for competitive bids. If the later obtains, 1) Official Statement. Accumulate and compile into a "short form" Official Statement, economic, financial and statistical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which "short form" Official Statement shall be satisfactory to you. The Official Statement will include the Official Notice of Sale. 2) Due Diligence Meetings. Prior to the pro- duction and distribution of any Official Statement, the City agrees to hold a due diligence meeting to verify the accuracy of the data contained in the Official Statement and make full disclosure of all pertinent information concerning the economy and finances of the City. We will participate in such due diligence meet- • ing and assist you in the examination of pertinent financial data. Municipal Financial Consultants A • City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Four 3) Production of an Official Statement. Under the supervision of the City, cause to produce said Official Statement. 4) Distribution of Official Statement. Distri- bute copies of the Official Statement to known under- writers of special assessment bonds. 5) UQdating of Official Statements. In the event the authorized financing is sold in more than one sale, we will update and distribute copies of the revised Official Statement in accordance with 1), 2), 3) and 4), above. 6) Consultation /Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, will be available for consultation and advice until such time as the bonds issued to finance the • Project have been sold. 7) Contact of Bond Underwriters. We will make direct contact with a select number of bond underwriters in an effort to stimulate bidding on the bonds if a competitive bond sale is conducted. 8) THE BOND BUYER Ad. If a competitive bond sale is conducted, we will place an advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the bond issue prior to the time bids are received for such issue. 9) Attendance at Bond Sales. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for bonds are received for the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids. 10) Necl_o tiat_ed Sale. If it is determined to sell the bonds by negotiated sale, we will conduct and /or assist in such negotiations and make appropriate recommendations to the City. C. Attendance at Bond Closing We will compute closing figures, including accrued • interest, and coordinate the events of the closing. Municipal Finan` ci Consullcnls ll' City of Rancho Cucamonga • Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Five D. Table of Debt Service After the bonds have been delivered, we will prepare and furnish the City a Table of Debt Service which will set forth actual semi - annual and annual payments of principal and interest due on the bonds. E. Procedure Manual We will prepare a procedure manual to be used by the City as a guide to service and administer the bonds. If a competitive bond sale is conducted at the time of payment for and delivery of the bonds, the City agrees to furnish the successful bidder a certificate, signed by the appropriate officials of the City, acting in their official capacity, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief, and after reasonable investigation, (a) neither the Official Statement nor any amendment or supplement • thereto contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading; (b) since the date of the Official Statement, no event has occurred which should have been set forth in such an amendment or supplement; nor (e) has there been any material adverse change in the operation or financial affairs of the City since the date of such Official Statement. FEES In the event the City decides to sell the contemplated bonds on a negotiated basis, our fee for services rendered will be at our current hourly rate of Eighty -Five Dollars ($85.00) with a maximum fee of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($8,500.00). In the event the City decides to offer the contemplated bonds at sealed competitive bid, our fee will be based on our current hourly rate of Eighty -Five Dollars ($85.00), which fee would be applied as a credit against the following contingent fee schedule: • Municipol F;nciTI l Consultants • City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Loyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Six Three - quarters (3/4) of One Percent of the first Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) assess- ments levied to finance the project, plus One -half (1/2) of One Percent of the assess- ments levied in excess of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00); provided, however, that fees based on this schedule shall not exceed Twenty -TWO Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($22,500.00). EXPENSES It is contemplated that we will pay our own out -of- pocket expenses and that the City will reimburse us for costs incurred in connection with paragraphs A. 3), 4), 5), and 8) above. • PAYMENT • 1) Fees based on hourly rates shall be due and payable monthly; and 2) Fees based on a percentage of assessments levied shall be due and payable upon confirmation of assessments. TERNS The City may terminate this agreement by giving written notice thereof to Consultant, provided that the City shall be obliged to pay Consultant for all work performed and all direct costs incurred prior to receipt of notice of termination by the Consultant. It is expressly understood that this agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advi- sory capacity only. Municipal Financial Consultants City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs November 24, 1981 Page Seven If the foregoing proposal is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, FIELDMAN, ROLAPP 6 ASSOCIATES By 1,�0_2" Lawrence G. Rolapp I { LGR:rs Attachment J Executed on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga • this 3rd day of December , 1981. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By Title Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: • Municipal Fin F101 Consultants fii11 0 • 0 Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS SCHEDULE OF RATES EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1981 Principal Consultants William L. Fieldman $85.00 Per Hour Lawrence G. Rolapp $85.00 Per Hour Carl Kadie - Kadie- Jensen $85.00 Per Hour Secretarial Services $16.00 Per Hour 2001 Business Center Drive, Suite 200 • Irvine. California 82715 • (714) 752.2781 11-7 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES GG ��cnnvolc " o 1977 BACKGROUND: Under the provisions of the California Environmental quality Act and the State Environmental Guidelines, cities are re- quired to adopt appropriate procedures for processing environmental documents. To date, the City has been utilizing the State Environ- mental Guidelines and there has been a need for developing more pre- cise guidelines for actual environmental processing. Attached is the City Environmental Guidelines as proposed by the Planning Division staff which sets up precise procedures for proces- sing environmental documents. The procedures are similar to what is presently being used. These guidelines are meant to be used in con- junction with the State Environmental Review Guidelines which set forth broader criteria and policies which must be met. Typically, the State amends the State Environmental Guidelines on an annual basis which normally causes cities to make appropriate amendments to their guidelines. However, we have taken the approach to write guidelines addressing only the processing portion of the environ- mental law and utilize the State low for other environmental criteria. The benefit in this procedure is the alleviation of time and cost caused by constant amendment to the guidelines as a result of State amendments. The only time we would necessitate amendments would be if the State amendments actually affected the way we were processing our environmental documents. The Ci�y Attorney and attorneys for the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the document and their comments have been incorporated. The Planning Conmlissiun has reviewed the guidelines and has recom- mended that the City Council adopt them. 0 City Environmental Guidelines -2- December 2, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the Planning Commission that the City Council adopt the attached guidelines and approve the Resolution. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Cowunity Development JL:MV:jr • Attachments: Environmental Guidelines Adopted Planning Ccmmission Resolution City Council Resolution • I�u RESOLUTION NO. 81 -135 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY EN- VIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 15000 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE WHEREAS, the State of California has enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to provide decisionmakers with useful information on how government actions affect the environment; and, WHEREAS, the State of California has developed environmental guidelines for the implementation of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, the state guidelines only provide basic criteria and direction which requires local agencies to prepare and adopt additional guidelines for environmental processing within its boundaries. SECTION l: Therefore, the Planning Commission hereby finds the following: 1. That additional guidelines are needed to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA. SECTION 2: The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the State Environmental Review Guidelines by incorporation by reference as now contained in Section 15000 et. seq. of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code and as hereafter amended. Further, to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA, the Commission recommends that the Council adopt the additional guidelines attached hereto. SECTION 3: The Planning Commission and City Council are hereby designated as the local agency for purposes of implementing the State EIR Guidelines, as supplemented. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLAtlNI11G COMMIS5 'ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY : n ATTEST Secretary of the Planning Cournission �T c� T Resolution No, 81 -135 Page 2 . I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: E • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None jai • RESOLUTION NO. 'G H155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AND ADOPTING BY REF- ERENCE THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 15000 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE WHEREAS, the State of California has enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to provide decisionmakers with useful information on how government actions affect the environment; and, WHEREAS, the State of California has developed environmental guidelines for the implementation of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, the state guidelines only provide basic criteria and direction which requires local agencies to prepare and adopt additional guidelines for environmental processing within its boundaries. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has recommended adoption of City Environmental Guidelines. SECTION 1: Therefore, the City Council hereby finds the • following: 1. That additional guidelines are needed to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby adopts the State Environ- mental Review Guidelines by incorporation by reference as now contained in Section 15000 et. seq. of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code and as hereafter amended. Further, to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA, the City Council hereby adopts the additional guidelines attached hereto. SECTION 3: The Planning Commission and City Council are hereby designated as the local agency for purposes of implementing the State EIR Guidelines, as supplemented. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: L �1h 0 • • ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES p G�3CA11I 1977 COQIMliRITZ' I)LVELOPNIF.AT Di PARBIll? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES CONTENTS Page California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1 Initial Study /Negative Declaration Process 2 -3 Environmental Impact Report Process 3 -6 APPENDIX Flow Chart A. Environmental Assessment Notice B Negative Declaration C Notice of Preparation D Notice of Completion E Notice of Determination F 0 • n Ll ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW HANDBOOK The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint the user with the procedures, policies, and administrative tools used to implement the California En- vironmental Quality Act (CEQA) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The in- tent of this information is to give the applicant a clear and accurate explanation of the Environmental Review process and its relationship to the State Environmental law and the City's development review process. CEQA - A BRIEF HISTORY In 1970, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was passed and signed into law. The Act reauired that Environmental Impact Reports be prepared for projects in actions which could have a significant impact on the environment. During its first few years, the Act was interpreted as applying only to projects constructed or carried out by governmental agencies. In 1972, the California Supreme Court decided that the term "projects" includes private projects, which are subject to public agency review and regulation. Following this decision, the legislature amended the definition of "project" to include private activities that are sub- ject to governmental review and approval. • The State Resources Agency prepared guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by local public agencies. The State Guidelines are binding on all local agencies. However, they are general guidelines and only provide the basic principles, objectives, criteria, and definitions which indi- vidual agencies shall adopt for internal use in implementing CEQA at the local level. The Guidelines allow individual agencies to develop their own review process within the limits of CEQA. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted the State Guidelines by reference and has developed an environmental review procedure within the parameters of CEQA and the State Guidelines. This handbook is designed to be an addendum to the State Guidelines, which will outline Rancho Cucamonga's specific environ- mental review procedures. • CEQA divides projects into two categories; discretionary and ministerial. A Discretionary project is an activity, which requires judgement deliber- ation, or decision by the public agency, prior to approval. Ministerial projects require a public agency to issue permits that do not require judgement or deliberation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that such activities as approval of final subdivision maps, issuance of building permits, issuance of business licenses, issuance of tree removal permits, issuance of encroachment permits, and approval of individual utility con- nections are ministerial projects and do not require environmental review. Certain types of activities, including those that are classified as small 1;� 4 scale discretionary projects, have been predetermined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are designated as a "cate- gorical exemption" from environmental review. These "categorical exemptions" are specifically listed in the State Guidelines. Environ- mental review is not required for categorically exempt activities or for ministerial projects. All discretionary projects require environ- mental review and /or clearance. INITIAL STUDY /NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROCESS Initial Study Questionnaire After it has been determined that a project required environmental review, the next step in the process is the completion of the Initial Study Questionnaire. The Initial Study Questionnaire is divided into two parts. Part I is completed by the applicant, Part II is completed by the Planning Division staff. The purpose of Part I is to gather general information about the proposed project, its environmental set- ting, and the type of impacts the project might be expected to have on the environment. Part II is a checklist containing a list of possible impacts. This checklist is completed by the Planning staff in conjunction with a field investigation and is used to gather and organize information • on potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. The Initial Study shall be completed within fourty -five (45) days from the date of acceptance of a complete application, unless a continuance or waiver is granted by the applicant. Staff Recommendation The completed Initial Study forms the basis for one of the following staff findings: 1. The proposed project may have a significant impact on the environ- ment. This finding forms the basis for a staff recommendation that an Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) or an expanded Initial Study be prepared for the project. 2. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. This finding forms the basis for a staff recommend- ation that a Negative Declaration be approved for the project. 3. The proposed project will not have a significant impact, if certain mitigation measures are added to the project. This finding forms the basis for a staff recommendation that a Negative Declaration be approved, provided that specific mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. -2- v ? • Planning Commission Review The staff recommendation will be advertised in the newspaper ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting, in the form of an Environmental Assessment Notice. The notice shall provide a full description of the project and staff's recommendation. The Staff Report and Part I of the Initial Study are presented to the Planning Commission at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission may take one of the following actions: 1. Require the preparation of an E.I.R. 2. Issue a Negative Declaration (finding no significant impact) with or without mitigation measures 3. Require that additional imformation be supplied prior to taking further action. If a Negative Declaration is approved, formal notification is sent to the applicant. A signed, approved copy of the Negative Declaration including both parts of the Initial Study, is sent to the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. After making the decision to Carry out or approve the project for which a Negative Declaration has been prepared, a Notice of Determination is sent to the County Clerk. • When a Negative Declaration is approved, the Environmental Process is completed, unless the decision is appealed to the City Council. In some cases, a project approval or issuance of a Negative Declaration, must be completed by the City Council, upon recommendation from the Planning Commission. In those cases, the Negative Declaration shall be signed by Council and sent after Council approval. u Apoeal to City Council Any environmental determination by the Planning Commission may be appealed in writing and filing appropriate fee to City Council, by any affected party within fourteen (14) days from the Commission's decision. After deliberation, the City Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the Planning Commission, or take any of the actions listed under the Planning Commission review section. ENVIRONPENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROCESS Determination that an E.I.R. is Required After reviewing the Initial Study and the staff recommendation, the Planning Commission may determine that an I.I.R. is required. The -3- IO 7 determination of the Commission shall be made at a public hearing which • has been lawfully advertised. During the public hearing, the Commission shall receive any public imput on the scope and content of the E.I.R. The Planning Commission, as part of their determination, shall discuss the focus of the E.I.R. The concerns voiced by the Commission and those received through the Notice of Preparation shall form the basis of the E.I.R. Notice of Preparation Once the decision has been made to require an E.I R. a "Notice of Prepar- ation" shall be prepared and sent by certified mail, to State, Regional and Local governmental agencies, school districts, and public utilities which may have an interest in the project. The Notice of Preparation contains a description of the project and information on the location and probable environmental effects of the project. This notice requests these agencies to make specific responses regarding the scope and content of the proposed E.I.R. and environmental information related to the agency's jurisdiction, which may be included in the E.I.R. Selection of a Consultant After determination of the scope and content of the E.I.R., staff shall prepare a "Request for Proposal" (RFP) on the project, to be sent to environmental consultants. The applicant may suggest that names be added to the list, however, the consultant is selected by the City and • will be under contract directly to the City to prepare the E.I.R. Neither the applicant nor consultants affiliated withihe applicant may be selected to prepare the report. After the consultant's proposals are received, the most qualified candidates are interviewed and a final consultant selection is made. Contract and Compensation A contract containing the scope of work and a work program for the E.I.R. is prepared and signed by the City and the consultant. The consultant's fee is established by the consultant and is payable by the applicant to the City upon finalization of the contract. In addition to the consul- tant's compensation,a fee equal to 202'• of the actual cost of the E.I.R. will be charged by the City to cover the City's costs for consultant selection, contact preparation, analysis of the E.I.R., public hearings, Staff Reports, and legal publications. The fees for the E.I.R. shall be deposited with the City in a Trust Account_ and shall be paid to the consultant as work is completed, Preparation and Printinq It is the consultant's task to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) in accordance with the contract with the City and in compliance with CEQA and State Environmental Guidelines. When the draft is completed, a -4- h Ic (• screen check of the text is performed by the Planning Division staff. Upon completion of any revisions required by staff, an appropriate number of copies of the D.E.I.R. are printed for distribution. The number of copies varies withthe nature of the project. The consultant shall be responsible for printing and distribution of the D.E.I.R., unless other- wise specified in the contract. Distribution and Review Copies of the D.E.I.R. with a "Notice of Completion" attached, are distributed by the consultant to State, Regional, and Local agencies for comment. If the project has been determined by the State Office of Planning and Research to have Regional and /or State wide significance, a review period of forty -five (45) days will be required, If not, the review period shall be a minimum of thirty (30) days. The Planning Division will receive the remainder of the copies, which are distributed to other City divisions and public agencies. Copies of the D.E.I.R. should be made available at the County Branch Library for public review. The City Planning Division is the lead agency for review of the D.E.I.R. All comments on the Draft E.I.R. are channelled through the Planning Division and forwarded to the consultant. The consultant will be re- sponsible for responding to these comments. Upon conclusion of the review period and the consultant's response to all comments, the Planning Division shall prepare a Staff Report to the Planning Commission on the • adequacy of the report and its findings All comments and responses will become an addendum to the D.E.I.R. Any changes or additions approved by the Planning Commission will be made by the consultant prior to printing the Final E.I.R. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission shall review the D,E.I.R. at an advertised public hearing. The Commission can take one of the following actions on the adequacy of the environmental impacts identified and its findings: 1. Require additional information or modifications in the text, before accepting the D.E.I.R. as adequate; or, 2. Accept the D.E.I.R. as adequate with a finding of no significant adverse impacts, based upon the implementation of mitigation measures outlined in the report; or, 3. Accept the M.I.R. as adequate with a finding of significant adverse impacts. The last finding (of significant adverse impact) does not necessarily prevent approval of the project. The project could be approved, but the approval body must show over riding considerations in such approval. If the Planning Commission is the approval bod- far the project, then the Commission shall be the certifying body. If the Council is the final approval body, then the Commission shall forward a recommendation to the -5- r) n r; c' City Council on the adequacy of the document. The City Council shall hold • a public hearing to consider such recommendation and any other input on the adequacy of the E.I.R. Notice of Determination After approving a project for which an E.I.R. has been prepared and certified, the City shall file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of San Bernardino County, Board of Supervisors. If the project requires discretionary approval from a State agency, the notice will also be filed with the State Secretary for Resources. If the City Council approves a project which would allow the occurrence of significant impacts, which are identified in the E.I.R., but are not mitigated, the City must state in writing, the overriding reasons to support its action based on the E.I.R. and /or other information in the record. This statement must be includedin the Notice of Determination. The filing of the Notice of Determination completes the formal Enviorn- mental ReviEW Process and starts a 30 -day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval under CEQA. Further Questions The foregoing is an overview of the Environmental Review Process as adopted and administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are more detailed provisions of CEQA and the State Environmental Guidelines • which are not covered in this handbook. Questions regarding these documents or this review process should be directed to the City Planning Division. • -6- 1 -2() 0 0 • APPENDIX CEQA PROCESS FLOW CHART Public agency determines whether the activity is a ,project" — Not a project — — — — — — • Project Public agency detemsines i/ — Statutory exemption — the project is exempt — Categorical exemption — — Not exempt Public agency evaluates project to determine if there is a possibility _ No possible significant that the project may have a sig- effect nificant effect on environment Possible significant effect No further action required under CEQA Determination of Iced agency where more than 1 public agency is involved Responsible agency Lead agency ead agency prepares t 1 Respond to informal study Respond to Notice of Pre- paration as to contents of draft EIR Comments on adequacy of r craft EIR or Nell five IL— C'atsultation Declaranon final EIR or Negative Declaration prepared by 1, agency Find on le."1111 ty of reducmgl or avoid in', sigmbcant environ- I Declaration Lead agency sells Notice of \ • preparation to responsible agency pletion and gives public notice of availability of draft EIR Public review, period Lead agency prepares final EIR including responses to comments on draft EIR Consideration and approval of final EIR by decision making body Findings on fcasiblity of reducing or avoiding significant environ - Leas agency gives public notice of availability of Negative Declaration Public review period / Lsion on Project State agencies Local agencies State agencies Local agencies Fde Nonce of File Notice of File Notice of File Nonce of Det <rm roan.. with Determination with Determination with Determination with Secretary jar Resources County Clerk Secretary for Resources County Clerk Appendix A ?rh I and approval Declaration • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE • Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following projects. The Planning Commission will be considering these assessments, staff's recommendation, and public input, at their meeting of prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of project and Staff's recommendation on the projects to be considered: A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Suite "B ", Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. written comments should be addressed to the Planning Division at the above address or phoned at (714) 989 -1851. In addition, concerns can he addressed to the Planning Commission publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. and shall take place at the Lion's Park Com- munity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. 7 � Appendix B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION • 1. Brief Description of Project: 2. Name and Address of Applicant: 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. 4. Minutes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are on file in the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. This decision may be appealed to the City Council • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written appeal and filing fee must be received by the Planning Division no later than 5:00 p.m. 6. This Negative Declaration is subject to the implementation of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments. DATED e Appendix C • Ll n \J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: FROM: (Responsible Agency ead Agency Address (Address) SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an environmental impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scone and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with tht proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location, and he probable environmental effects ore contained in the ottcched materials. A copy of the Initial Study _ is, _ is not, attached. Due to the time limits mandated by State liw, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to at the address shown above. We will need the name for a contact person m your agency. Project Title: Project Applicant, if any: DATE Signature Title Telephone Appendix D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FORM Project Title roject Location — Specific Project Location —City Project Location County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project Lead Agency Division Address Where Copy of EIR is Available Contact Person Area Code Phone Extension Appendix E 0 • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION • TO: _ Secretary for Resources FROM: city of Rancho Cucamonga 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Planning Division Sacramento, California 95814 P. 0. Box 807 or County Clerk Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 County of San Bernardino SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Location This is to advise that the • Lead Agency or Respons.Ele Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: I. The project _ will, will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: 3. Mitigation measures _ were, _ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations _ was, _ was not, adopted for this project. Date: • Appendix F i • U CITY OF RANCHO CUC"ONGA CuCAMo STAFF REPORT' a Fyn Date: December 16, 1981 C > is» To: City Council and City Manager From: Hill Holley, Director, Community S vices Department Subject: Information regarding Senior Citizen Needs at the Neighborhood Center The Community Services Department requests a continuance of this item to January 20, 1982. This request is based on difficulty of finding contractors who are willing to bid the job on the wall and counter modifications. The continuance will permit us to return to Council with requested dollar specifics on the overall project total, which will include wall and counter modifications, refrigera- tor, and reducting of the air conditioning and ventilation system. if you have any questions regarding this continuance please give me a call. Thank you WLA :nm 1 a RESPONSE TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION On December 10, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga received a comment on the Draft EIR from Caltrans via the Office of Planning and Research, the State Clearinghouse for environmental documents. Although the legally required review period of 45 days transpired November 26, 1981 and the Agency is legally not required to respond to late comments, the Agency's staff desires to bring the comment and response to the attention of the Council and Agency. The Department of Transportatian ties four concerns which are as follows: 1. The proposed interohnnge on I -15 at 7th Street is probably not feasible given insufficient distance between interchanges, anticipated development, and future need. 2. The Report states that there will be impacts on Foothill Boulevard, the junction of 1 -15 and Foothill Boulevard, and the proposed interchange at I -15 and 7th Street but fails to addreas these impacts or provide specific mitigation measures. 3. The construction of park and ride lots and transit interface facilities should be considered, 4. The report should discuss costs related to transit improvements, potential for fund;ng, and source of funds. The first comment was addressed in the Final EIR on the Draft Industrial Specific Plan. The comment stated that City staff and their traffic consultant believed that the interchange was possible and met minimum standards set forth for freeway design. Although Caltrans believes the interchange not feasible at this time, the City and Agency can pursue the project until a specific proposal is not accepted. The General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan would then he modified to reflect the transit situation. Impacts on Foothill Boulevard, the junction of 1 -15 and Foothill Boulevard, and the proposed interchange at 1 -15 and 7th Street have been discussed in the Draft EIR for the Rancho Redevelopment Plan summarily and discussed further in the General Plan EIR and Industrial Specific Plan EIR. The Draft EIR for the Rancho Redevelopment Project was prepared as a subsequent EIR to that prepared for the General Plan and incorporated by reference, the Industrial Specific. Plan EIR and Victoria Community Plan EIR. The above cited impacts were discussed in more detail in the Industrial Specific Plan EIR and an excerpt from that document has been attached. In terms of specific mitigation measures, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has extensive do::ulnentation of proposed circulation improvements. These improvements are intended to acc,>mmodate anticipated growth in the City. The City has further indicated in the Final EIR far the Industrial Specific Plan that modifications to the Specific Plan will be made if certain, proposed improvements are not completed. It is anticipated that tax increment revenues, developer fees, and, hopefully, increased gas tax revenues will be available to assist in providing necessary improvements. At this time, it is difficult to predict exactly when certain intersections and roadways will be significantly impacted. The purpose of the Draft EIR on the Rancho Redevelopment Plan is to highlight areas of concern, incorporate mitigation measures where feasible and use the information to assist in focusing the detailed analyses of potential traffic constraints which are recommended (in the General Plan) be included in specific development proposals. Park and ride lots and other alternative transit facilities are discussed and have been incorporated as mitigation measures in existing certified EIRs which pertain to the Redevelopment Project Area. Transit improvement costs in the Redevelopment Project Area approximate $17,500,000. Available City funds for transit improvements fall short of this total cost which emphasizes the need for redevelopment and tax increment revenues. The potential for increased revenues from the State gas tax is likely and a final decision on the proposed $.02 increase in the gas tax is expected within two weeks. It is also anticipated that tax increment financing will assist the City in providing the needed transit improvements. Results of this process ore given in Figure VI -16 for seven critical intersections. These were utilized for intersection capacity analysis as discussed in the next section. IMPACTS This section describes traffic impacts of Industrial Area development. Three levels of analysis were performed: Roadway Network; Major Intersections; and Freeway Access. Roadway Network Analysis. Considerable attention has been given in the past to developing an appropriate roadway network for the Industrial Area. In the western portion, much of the network is constrained by existing developments and rights -of -way. Even in the largely undeveloped eastern portion of the Industrial Area, the arterial road system is r- lotively well defined by existing freeway access points. Hence, the focus of the current effort is to ensure that adequate capacity is available on existing and planned roadways within the Industrial Area to meet long -range tr off ic levels. Traffic flows are useful in attaining on understanding of the general nature of traffic in an area, but do not by themselves indicate the ability of the street network to carry additional / traffic, nor the quality of service afforded by the street l facilities. For this, the concept of "Level of Service" has been developed to correlate numerical traffic - volume data to subjective descriptions of traffic performance at inter- sections. Intersections are the controlling "bottlenecks" of traffic flow, and the ability of a roadway system to carry traffic is nearly always constrained at roadway 'inter- sections. Table VI -16 presents the Level of Service categories, "A" through "F ", considered in this analysis, and indicates the corresponding volume -to- capacity ratios and qualitative definition of each category. Levels "A" to "C" represent good traffic service; "D" is fair; and "E" and "F" are progressively poorer. This study considers Level of Service "D" as the minimum acceptable standard for peak - period traffic conditions on city streets in the long -range future. This level is commonly accepted for traffic planning in other urbanized communities and is the city's present standard. Although it implies congested conditions, these would occur only during short periods and at critical locations on the network. During other times and at other locations, Levels of Service "A" to "C" would prevail. Based on the Level of Service "D" standard, generalized midblock roadway capacities were calculated for each typical VI -62 TABLE VI -16: LEVELS OF HIGHWAY SERVICE INTERPRETATION C Level of Service A B C D E F Source: Volume to Capacity Ratio 0 -60 Percent 60-70 Percent 70-80 Percent 80 -90 Percent 99 -100 Percent Over 100 Percent Based on National Academy of Sciences, Highway Capacity Manual, 1965, and the Draft Final Report for update of the manual. VI -63 �, I Delay Range (Sec. per Description Vehicle Excellent operation. All approaches to 0 -16 signalized intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. No vehicles wait longer than one red traffic signal indication. Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feel 16 -22 somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to a signalized intersection may occasionally be fully utilized, and a substantial number of cycles are approaching full use. Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have 22 -28 to wait through more than one red signal indi- cation, and bock -ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. This level is typically associated with urban design practices. Fair operation. Cars are required to wait 28 -35 through more thnn one traffic cycle during short peaks. There are no longstanding traffic queues. Poor operation. Some longstanding vehicular 35 -40 queues develop on critical approaches to inter- sections. Delays may be up to several signal cycles. Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. 40 or Backups from locations downstream or on the greater cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. Volume to Capacity Ratio 0 -60 Percent 60-70 Percent 70-80 Percent 80 -90 Percent 99 -100 Percent Over 100 Percent Based on National Academy of Sciences, Highway Capacity Manual, 1965, and the Draft Final Report for update of the manual. VI -63 �, I roadway cross - section utilized in Rancho Cucamonga. As defined here, roadway capacity is the maximum volume of traffic that the facility can carry in a specified time period without operating below the Level of Service "D" standard. (This is 10 percent below the facility's maximum practical capacity.) Hourly capacities were calculated for each roadway cross - section using procedures outlined in the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual and the Draft Final report of the manual update. These were modified to reflect typical operating conditions in Rancho Cucamonga. Adjustments were also made to account for loss of capacity at signalized intersections due to capacity being shared by two directions of flow. Daily capacities were then estimated assuming typical ratios of hourly to daily traffic. Resulting Level of Service "D" capacities are given in Table VI -17. TABLE VI -17 MID -BLOCK ROADWAY CAPACITIES AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" Number of One -Way Two -Way / Standard Major Arterial Through Hourly Daily Section Description Lanes Capacity Capacity2 A Local 2 B Collector 2 600 12,000 4 1,000 22,000 C Secondary 4 1,150- 23,000- 1,300 26,000 D Major Arterial 4 1,400 26,000- 28,000 E Major Divided 6 2,150 43,000 Arterial 'Assumes two -way operation; no parking, 5% trucks; 10% left turns; 10% right turns; 0.85 peak hour factor, 0.40 -0.60 G /C, 2.Assumes 10% of daily traffic is in peak hour Table VI -18 presents results of the roadway network analysis. General roadway adequacy is evaluated by comparing projected ADT volumes at build -out to planned VI -64 C TABLE VI -18 ROADWAY VOLUME /CAPACITY (V /C) RATIOS AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" :r VI -65 ?�K�e f "2'Ys Through Projected Capacity Street Segment Class. Lanes ADT Vol. (Veh /day) V/C Vineyard 4th - Foothill Sec. 4 28,000 26 000 1.1 Hellman 4th - Foothill Sec. 4 8,000 23,000 0.3 Archibald 4th - Foothill Art. 4 22,000 28,000 0.8 Turner 4th- Foothill Sec. 4 5,000 23,000 0.2 Haven 4th - Foothill Art, 6 60,000 43,000 1.4 Milliken 4th - Foothill Art. 6 40,000 43,000 0.9 Rochester 4th -6th Art. 4 6,000 26,000 0.2 6th -Arrow Art. 4 17,000 26,000 0.7 Arrow - Foothill Art. 4 10,000 26,000 0.4 Foothill Haven- DevoreFwy Art. 6 40- 57,000 43,000 0.9 -1.3 Arrow Rte. Vineyard - Archibald Art. 4 11,000 26,000 0.4 Haven- Devore Fwy Art. 4 16,000 26,000 0.6 C 7th Street Rochester - Devore Fwy. Art. 4 29,000 28,000 1.0 6th Street Vineyard -Haven Sec. 4 25,000 26,000 1.0 Haven - Rochester Art. 6 20,000 43,000 0.5 4th Street Vineyard - Devore Fwy Art. 6 17,000 43,000 0.4 :r VI -65 ?�K�e f "2'Ys capacity at Level of Service "D ". Volume- to- copcity (V /C) ratios greater than unity imply unacceptable traffic service ! over the roadway segment. \ I The only streets within the Industrial Area that are projected to potentially experience substantial overloading are Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. In the case of Foothill Boule- vard, heaviest volumes are projected toward the east near the Devore Freeway, and this indicates a significant freeway access problem. However, alternative Industrial Area freeway access routes -7Th and 4th streets —are projected to operate satisfactorily throughout the Industrial Area. In the north -south direction, Haven Avenue is substantially overloaded along its length. Moreover, there is little potential for diversion of Haven Avenue traffic to parallel arterial routes as both Milliken and Archibald avenues ore close to their respective capacities. Major Intersections. Major intersections within the Industrial ren were evaluated in greater detail since these are potential bottlenecks in the roadway network. As with the roadway analysis, Level of Service "D" was considered the minimum acceptable standard for peok- period conditions, and results ore expressed in terms of volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratios. For intersection analysis, the "critical movement analysis" technique* was utilized to calculate V/C ratios. In this r process, total intersection turn volumes (as shown previously in Figure VI -16) are assigned to individual approach lanes. For each direction of traffic, critical flows are determined by taking the maximum through plus opposing left -turn volumes. These are then summed for the north -south and east -west direction to yield the critical summation volume for the intersection. The resulting volume, which represents the total intersection traffic volume to be accommodated in a single equivalent lane, is then compared to a standard intersection capacity (per equivalent lane). In this case, a capacity of 1,500 vehicles per hour was assumed for Level of Service "D "; this is higher than the average value recommended by the Transportation Research Board, but is judged to be more in keeping with values observed in Southern California. Results of the analysis of seven Industrial Area intersections are tabulated in Table VI -19. The enalyis assumes that in general, separate single left- and right -turn lanes are provided on all approaches; in some cases, double left -turn lanes are assumed. In all cases, the number of through (ones is equal to the number of lanes carried midblock upstream of the intersection. Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board, 1980, VI -66 FIGURE VI -16 : PROJECTED INTERSECTION PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES . C. HAVEN MILLIKEN ROCHESTER 000 T-380 N I O .G720 4^ 1820 210 FOOTHILL 60 BLVD. 560 280 1250 r4 1560 180 -1 280 Nom o00 M l7 v'1 lm')�4 40 200 N 0 0 0 0 0 m 17 N ARROW �"" ROUTE X400 �' 80 200 � t T (� 220 -^-� I o 370 --j �f� I ('3 320 N ov 250 0 0 0 m W W rN ^ 4'H STREET 80 170 110 L. 7 1 r> 000 M M P r m N N -580 <--I 70 - r' 290 7 1 r> 000 M M P r m N N 780 240 --> 100-- vofb VI -67 m P �L 470 EJ y -1940 �r 50 160 T 1830 ---� 110 O O MN � 80 440 780 240 --> 100-- vofb VI -67 m P �L 470 EJ y -1940 �r 50 160 T 1830 ---� 110 O O MN � TABLE VI -19 PROJECTED VOLUME /CAPACITY RATIOS - INTERSECTIONS, AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" Lane Additions` Dble. left Turns— oll approaches Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; WB Dble. left turn lanes —WB; SB Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; SB; EB Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; SB; EB *Unless otherwis> stated, all cpproaches are assn, red to have one left turn and one right turn lane in addition to mid -block through lanes. According to the table, the Foothill /Haven intersection is the most heavily overloaded intersection in the city. Even with double left -turn and right -turn lanes on all approaches, the intersection is projected to operate substantially above capacity. The second worst intersection is at Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; this one is projected to operate slightly above capacity, assuming double left -turn lanes on three approaches. Other intersections requiring double left -turn lanes on at least some approaches are on Haven Avenue at 4th Street and at Arrow Route; these are projected to operate satisfactorily. The remaining three intersections considered are projected to operate satisfactorily with single left -turn lanes. Congestion at Foothill and Haven appears to be a recurring problem under oil land use alternatives. Both roadways are being widened to the maximum extent practical and still allow proper signal control and of -grade crossing by pedestrians. To further mitigate this congestion, traffic must either be reduced on Haven or consideration be given to ypgroding the capacity of the intersection by a grade separation. The section on mitigation measures discusses the issue of a new through -route in the Haven- Milliken corridor in more detail. Freeway Access. The City's Industrial Area is afforded excellent accessibility to the regional freeway system of present. Seven freeway interchanges serve the area. Two of these - -4th Street and Foothill Boulevard -- access the Devore Freeway on the eastern edge of Industrial Area Zone B. The remaining interchanges are along the San Bernardino Freeway VI -68 C � C PM Peak Four Intersection Volume Capacity V/C Haven /Foothill 1890 IS00 1.26 Haven /Arrow Route 1340 1500 0.89 Haven /4th 1470 1500 0.98 Milliken/Foothill 1590 1500 1.06 Milliken /Arrow Route 1200 1500 0.80 Milliken /4th 1500 1500 1.00 Rochester /Foothill 1440 1500 0.96 Lane Additions` Dble. left Turns— oll approaches Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; WB Dble. left turn lanes —WB; SB Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; SB; EB Dble. left turn lanes - -NB; SB; EB *Unless otherwis> stated, all cpproaches are assn, red to have one left turn and one right turn lane in addition to mid -block through lanes. According to the table, the Foothill /Haven intersection is the most heavily overloaded intersection in the city. Even with double left -turn and right -turn lanes on all approaches, the intersection is projected to operate substantially above capacity. The second worst intersection is at Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; this one is projected to operate slightly above capacity, assuming double left -turn lanes on three approaches. Other intersections requiring double left -turn lanes on at least some approaches are on Haven Avenue at 4th Street and at Arrow Route; these are projected to operate satisfactorily. The remaining three intersections considered are projected to operate satisfactorily with single left -turn lanes. Congestion at Foothill and Haven appears to be a recurring problem under oil land use alternatives. Both roadways are being widened to the maximum extent practical and still allow proper signal control and of -grade crossing by pedestrians. To further mitigate this congestion, traffic must either be reduced on Haven or consideration be given to ypgroding the capacity of the intersection by a grade separation. The section on mitigation measures discusses the issue of a new through -route in the Haven- Milliken corridor in more detail. Freeway Access. The City's Industrial Area is afforded excellent accessibility to the regional freeway system of present. Seven freeway interchanges serve the area. Two of these - -4th Street and Foothill Boulevard -- access the Devore Freeway on the eastern edge of Industrial Area Zone B. The remaining interchanges are along the San Bernardino Freeway VI -68 C � C C L (1 -10) three - quarters of a mile south of the Industrial Area; these are located at Milliken, Haven, Archibald, and Vineyard avenues and at 4th Street near Grove Avenue. Despite the large number of interchanges that serve the Industrial Area, freeway access was identified in earlier studies as a potential future problem. Most of the existing interchanges are relatively low in capacity due to such factors as single -lane ramps, left -turn access onto and off arterial routes, inadequate left -turn queuing space, and narrow freeway - crossing structures. Moreover, the interchanges are shared by traffic from Industrial Area C (enst of the Devore Freeway), the northern half of the city, and the City of Ontario. (The last includes the Ontario Motor - Speedway area and vicinity and the Ontario International Airport, both of which are expected tv generate greatly increased traffic in the future.) Two major Devore Freeway interchange improvements have been assumed in the future highway network. The City -Wide and Industrial Area Traffic Study (March 1980) identified the potential need for an additional DevorgEreeway interchange at 7th Street to serve the Industrial Area. (Although the plan appears feasible, CalTrans has not yet formally approved the concept, nor is there funding available.) The second major freeway access improvement assumed in the analysis is upgrading of the Foothill Boulevard interchange in concert with development of the Victoria Homes Community. Included me direct ramps to and from the proposed regional shopping center. Table VI -20 summarizes projected ADT volumes and capaci- ties on Industrial Area freeway access routes. Capacities have not been reduced to reflect freeway ramp and inter- section effects and are therefore likely to be somewhat overstated. Also, projected volumes are based on an "all -or- nothing" assignment method that does not consider capacity constraints on particular routes. Nevertheless, the table gives a general indication of freeway access conditions in the future. Approaches to the Devore Freeway appear to have sufficient overall capacity, but there is a potential for substantial peak - period overloading at Foothill Boulevard which could result in additional traffic being diverted to 7th and 4th streets. The north -south approaches to 1 -10 are of greater concern, however, since there is a potential net deficiency of capacity across the entire screenline. Haven Pvenue appears to be the critical facility, with a projected volume over 40% above capacity north of 4th Street. Closer to 1 -10, the potential overload is greater due to additional Traffic from the proposed Ontario Motor Speedway Developments and vicinity. The 7th Street and 4th Street interchanges at the Devore Freeway were analyzed in more detail. Peak - period VI -69 TABLE VI -20 PROJECTED VOLUME /CAPACITY RATIOS— FREEWAY ACCESS ROUTES Note: Daily capacity is at Level of Service "D" based on general mid -block lane widths. Capacities do not reflect reductions due to interchange geometrics and are therefore likely to be overstated in the table. VI -70 C `1 Projected Daily Location ADT Volume Capacity V/C West of Devore Freeway Foothill 57,000 43,000 1.33 7th 29,000 28,000 1.04 4th Iy 4.3,000 0.40 Total 103,000 114,000 0.90 North of 4th Milliken 40,000 43,000 0.93 Haven 61,000 43,000 1.42 Archibald 22,000 28,000 0.79 Vineyard 29,000 26,000 1.22 Total 152,000 140,000 1.09 North of I -10 Freeway Milliken 60,000 43,000 1.40 Haven 75,000 43,000 1.74 Archibald 20,000 28,000 0.71 Vineyard 12,000 26,000 0.46 4th 32,000 26,000 1.23 Total 199,000 166,000 1.20 Note: Daily capacity is at Level of Service "D" based on general mid -block lane widths. Capacities do not reflect reductions due to interchange geometrics and are therefore likely to be overstated in the table. VI -70 C `1 volume /capacity ratios were estimated for the four ramp /nrterial -route intersections using the "Critical Lane Summation" method and are summarized in Table VI -21. As f indicated in the table, the 7th Street /Devore Freeway West Ramps intersection is projected to operate 10% above capacity, while all other intersections would operate below capacity. Southbound freeway onramps at both interchanges are projected to carry about 1,500 vehicles per hour, which is about their capacity. The heavy ramp volumes would likely result in less than desirable weaving conditions with southbound freeway traffic. TABLE VI -21 PROJECTED VOLUME /CAPACITY RATIOS - 4TH AND 7TH STP.EET /DEVORE FREEWAY INTERCHANGES Vehicles Per Hour Rams Volume* Capacity ** V/C 7th Street /West Devore Fwy. 1650 1500 1.10 7th Street /Easot Devore Fwy. 1120 1500 .75 4th Street /West Devore Fwy. 1070 1500 .71 4th Street /East Devore Fwy. 500 1500 .33 ( *Sum of critical volumes. * *Level of Service "D ". 1 In sum, freeway access may be congested in the future, even with the addition of a new Devore Freeway interchange at 7th Street. The severity of the problem is highly dependent on development levels outside the Industrial Area, as only a fraction of the total traffic volume is generated within the Industrial Area. MITIGATIONS This section discusses a number of measures that should be taken to mitigate traffic impacts upon full build -out of the Industrial Area. It should be noted that implementation of a number of the mitigation measures (e.g., Foothill Freeway Construction; network modifications; TSM program) has been assumed in the preceding impact analysis, and if they are not accomplished, those impacts would be greater. VI-71 Roadway Network Modifications. Relative to the proposed network developed in the City -Wide and Industrial Area Traffic Study, the following roadway network modifications are recommended within the Industrial Area: l New Rochester. As discussed ir. the City -Wide and In ustri— al Area Traffic Study and incorporated in the Industrial Area Plan, Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to north of 7th Street should be relocated to the west. This is needed to provide adequate distance for turning lanes between the Rochester and the Devore Freeway ramp intersections along 4th and (in yhe future) 7th Streets. Desirably, this new alignment should be carried north to the first collector street beyond Foothill Boulevard, thereby providing a continuous, direct, north -south route to supplement Milliken Avenue. However, the AT &SF Railway plans to construct a railroad yurd approximately between existing Rochester Avenue and future Milliken Avenue. To avoid grade separating New Rochester over the railroad yard, the existing Rochester grade crossing should be retained. This would necessitate a tight reverse curve from New Rochester to existing Rochester south of the AT &SF tracks. This alignment has been assumed in the current study but should only be adopted if the railroad yard cannot be shifted westerly and if an acceptable reverse curvature can be provided within the available distance between 7th ! Street and the railroad tracks. Such a question can be resolved only by a detailed geometric alignment study. Day Creek Boulevard. This alignment, proposed as part of the Victoria Homes development, should extend southerly across Arrow Route and connect into Rochester north of the AT &SF tracks. Cleveland Avenue. As will be discussed later, the need for additional north -sovth roadway capacity through the Industrial Aren is highly dependent upon future development levels in the Ontario Motor Speedway, as well as in the area bounded by Haven, Baseline, Milliken, and Arrow Route (Terra Vista and Rancho Cucamonga Business Pork). At projected traffic levels, however,- Ihere­oppears_ to be a need for another continuous route h'am Faot-iilrBovlevZ t S- 6mh-tu the -SorrBernardin F-r-eeWox,- Wfeduce- froffir on Haven and Miliken- venues see Table VI-22)-and-reduce-critical- overloads, -at-Te intersections of Foothill /Haven and Foothill /Milliken. Cleveland Avenue is the most appropriate alignment. To be fully effective as an alternative route, it should extend south of 4th Street and connect across the San Bernardino Freeway to a new south frontage road. Extension of Cleveland C. VI-72 Avenue to the north would involve a new crossing of the AT &SF railroad tracks. c TABLE 22 EFFECTS OF CLEVELAND AVENUE EXTENSION Haven- Milliken Corridor (Vehicle /Day) ' Screen Location Total Total Volume Ca acit (V /C) South of Foothill Without Cleveland Ave. 79,000 86,000 0.92 With Cleveland Ave. 79,000 112,000 0.71 AT & SF Railroad Without Cleveland Ave. 97,000 86,000 1.13 With Cleveland Ave. 97,000 112,000 0.87 North of 4th Street Without Cleveland Ave. 101,000 86,000 1.17 With Cleveland Ave. 101,000 112,000 0.90 Access to the San Bernardino Freeway is a major issue associated with the Cleveland Avenue extension. Cleveland Avenue would upgrade capacity sufficiently through Rancho Cucamonga's Industrial Area, bui much of that traffic would still have to access the freeway at Haven or Milliken Avenue. Hence, this improvement, unless coupled with 1 -10 freeway access improvements in Ontario, would simply move the traffic bottleneck farther south into Ontario. At a minimum, it would likely be necessary to provide a grade separated crossing of 1 -10 at Cleveland Avenue and to tie Cleveland Avenue into a one -way frontage road system paralleling the freeway. Existing "G" Street in Ontario could be used as the north (westbound) frontage road. These improvements should logically be considered in any . redevelopment of the Ontario Motor Speedway and vicinity by the City of Ontario. Intersection Improvements. Intersections are usually the controlling "bottlenecks" in a highway network, due to two traffic streams sharing the same roadway space. It is therefore important to make intersection improvements in concert with any roadway widenings so as to allow the roadway's capacity to be developed. Figure IV -17 summarizes recommended approach lanes at key Industrial Area VI -73 FIGURE VI -17 , DIRECTIONAL LANE REQUIREMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS 1 32 1 21 �--1 1 32 '--I FOOTHILL 4-- 3 S 2 "'� f f 1 y 7 2 BLVD. �i> 3 -� h� r-) 12 3 131 3-4 (-'11' 3--j 1-', 231 1-,1 1 2 1-q, 1 2 31 1 3 1 't- I 1 3 1 ���� 2 1 ARROW 2 ROUTE 1 2 �El 2 12 1a 231 1 3 1 1 EILj <2 �1 6TH STREET 1 T 2-4 fl r> 1'y 131 1 3 2 1 rJ I . L) 4 - 3 4TH V C I STREET 1.5, 3 -'- fi r� 1 y 2 3 1 HAVE N 2 1 1 3 1 ���� 'C- 1 U3 3 �2 2-4 T �(1 ri 2 �El 12 1q 131 VI -74 ( 1 C C� U3 3 <-3 3—� T 3 -� h� r-) 12 131 3 3 4 I 1 3 --7� �F(� f> 2 131 CLEVELAND MILLIKEN VI -74 ( 1 C C� FIGURE VI -17 . Cortinued. `. ROCHESTER 1 2 1 2 1 cJ �L-> 3 FOOTHILL `ter 1 BLVD. 2 -� Fl� f) I y 1 2 1 7TH STREET C 6TH STREET NEW ROCHESTER 21 I. 1 w'7 yr 2 2 2 22 1 2 2 4TH �' 3 STREET 3,! T 2 C 1 -15 12 (4 V' F— 2 E-- 2 w.. 2 -P 2 -I 2 --� 2 -� VI -75 I -15 2 -1 2 -a' 2-) 2 -j i intersections. The lone configurations are intended to guide right -of -way development; actual lane requirements will also be affected by site- specific access design and other unknowns. As a general rule, each intersection should include one separate Taft -turn lonebnd -as -many- through -lanes as there me navel- fdne's- upstream. At some locations, double_IR - turn Panes- wilt- be- recessary to increase capacity and reduce left -turn queuing length. Right -turn lanes should also be provided where indicated. Right -turn lanes will require II feet of additional approach width for about 300 feet upstream of an intersection, compared to the dimensions shown in Figure IV -2 of the City -Wide Industrial Area Traffic_ Study (March 1980). Access to Arterials. To insure safe and smooth traffic flow along major arterials, side frictions should be minimized, This means no on- street parking; few, if any, driveways; and no median o s}rvc ions - -svc s left -turn traffic signals, regularly spaced intersectons and traffic signals, and confinement of left -turn movements to specific locations. Ultimotely, after the city has matured and traffic volumes have stabilized, raised medians should be constructed. The use of temporary medians (via paint, traffic bars, or other inexpensive methods) should be encouraged while traffic volumes are growing and subject to change. Driveway access along arterial streets should be discouraged; In no cose should left -turn access-be provided. Instead, access should be concentrated on crossing collector streets. Intersections should be spaced at least 1,100 feet cpart--as shown in Figure VI -18. This will provide adequate storage lengths for left -turn lanes, including toper, and still allow a minimal distnce of full -width median which con be attractively landscaped. Signalized intersections should be about 1/2 mile apart to achieve satisfactory progression. Oddly spaced signals make two -way progression very difficult. "T" intersections can be spaced as closely as 940 feet apart and still provide for left -turn entry and exit lanes on the arterial. Since left- turning sidestreet traffic crosses each direction of the arterial separately, these intersections work very effectively without the benefit of signalizotion. Freeway Acess. A new Devore Freway interchange is recommended at 7th Stteet: Interchange imprcW&m is are also needed at Foothill Boulevard; these should be- considered in concert witli ariy development of areas north of FoothRl Boulevard. Cleveland Avenue should be developed as a four -lone arterial from north of Foothill Boulevard to o new east-west froiifuge VI -76 of g� -o 0 ` N O rt of _s Minor Street o N O A: "T" INTERSECTION J K K Minor Street FIGURE VI -18: ARTERIAL INTERSECTION SPACING II 0 O ON 0 O N Arterial A J K W Q Minor Street B; FULL INTERSECTION VI -77 t road south of the Son Bernardino Freeway. This will necessitate a new crossing of the AT &SF tracks and of the San Bernardino Freeway. Details of the alignment south of 4th Street must be worked out with the City of Ontario and l proposed developments such as the Ontario Motor Speedway site. Reduction of Travel Demand. The traffic projections reported in earlier sections assume the presence of effective measures to minimize peak - period auto usage in the Industrial Area. Such measures may include, for example, public_- fronsit_ improvements, ride - sharing incentives, modified work hours,_ bicyc(e-facilities, and- on-site employee - services sJcF as coal, —ln itie absence of suchmeasuresi project - -e3_ fly and peak - period traffic levels and congestion would be significantly greater than previously indicated. The goo!s for reduced auto usage rates were incorporated by assuming lower vehicle -trip generation rates for Industrial Area sites. Table W -23 summarizes these trip- making rates. TABLE VI -23 INDUSTRIAL AREA VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION 'rrips Per Standard Reduced Industrial Employee Rate* Rate ** Reduction Daily (Two-Way) 3.0 2.5 17% PM Peak Four - Inbound 0.105 0.088 16% - Outbound 0.315 0.242 23% Total 0.420 0.330 21% * Average rate used in Citywide and Industrial Area Traffic Study. "* Average rate used in current study. Although the targeted reductions are optimistic, they are judged achievable over the long range if strong incentives to use alternatives to the single - occupant auto are mode avait- able to Industrial Area employees. Some elements of a potentially effective program are discussed below. a) Public Transit Improvements -- At present, Omnitrons is the sole provider of public transit service in the area. Existing bus routes serve little of the Area and are low in frequency of service. In the long range, however, when the Industrial Area and other nearby areas are t VI -78 VI -79 5 more fully developed, bus service will be more viable. The adopted long -range transportation plan for San CBernardino County calls for a substantially increased : -,,el of transit service in the future, with an overall 10% growth in ridership projected by 1990. Caltrans has completed a preliminary feasibility study for 0 commuter rail demonstration project that would link Son Bernardino to Los Angeles via rail. The AT &SF line that traverses the Industrial Area of Rancho Cucamonga is one of two lines being considered for service. Although the short -range (1981) demonstration plan does not include a station within Rancho Cucamonga, it is conceivable that if the demonstration Project is implemented and is successful, a station could ultimately be provided within the Industrial Area. The commuter rail service would complement Omnitrans bus service and, if well located and served by bus feeder lines, could service both in - commuters and out- commuters. Its potential for ridership is, however, rather limited when compared to the number of auto trips generated. The service is envisioned as only a limited peak - period service; the need to avoid interference with freight operations limits the amount of passenger service possible. Moreover, the target market for such a service is the long- distance commuter, and .this represents a relatively small fraction of the total trip - making. Hence, while the commuter rail service, as envisioned, would be a highly visible effort to encourage public transit usage and is therefore worthy of the city's support, bus service will likely remain the chief means of public transportation in the Rancho Cucamonga area. At this stage of planning, it is important that barriers to future transit service provision be avoided on potential transit routes. Figure II -3 identifies possible major transit corridors within the City. Presently, buses operate on Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue within the Industrial Area. In the future, however, it would seem more likely that Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue would be primary bus corridors as higher density uses are developed along them. They would be used for both inter - community and inter -city service, providing connections to major existing and future generators such as regional shopping center, civic center, Chaffey College and Ontario International Airport. Haven Avenue would also be 0 prime site for a Passenger rail stop if the proposed commuter roil service were to operate along the AT &SF line. Alternatively, Haven Avenue is a potential transfer point between any bus service operating in HOV lanes in either the San Bernardino or Route 30 corridor and 4 intro -city lines. (See Figure VI-19) VI -79 5 U. VI-80 Al OL OL Al Ultimately, secondary corridors would also develop for C local and inter- community service. To provide bus service within 1/4 mile walking distance of all of the Industrial Area, routes would have to be located no more than 1/2 mile apart. This would effectively mean that all primary and secondary streets within the Industrial Area would be potential bus routes. b) Ride - Sharing Incentives -- Ride - sharing encompasses all forms of transportation that involve pre - orronged shared rides for travellers with similar origins, destinations and travel schedules. Included are carpools, vanpools and subscription bus (commuter club.. bus) services. Ride-sharing reduces traffic by accommodating the some number of travellers in fewer vehicles. The primary market for ride - sharing is the work commute trip, which makes ride - sharing a promising means to reduce traffic in the Industrial Area. Within Rancho Cucamonga, ride - sharing is facilitated and promoted by Commuter Computer. Results elsewhere have indicated that employer- sponsored programs can be most effective, particularly for larger employers. Actions that can be taken by employers include: C • Distributing ride - shoring matching forms to all new employees and regularly to continuing employees; • Surveys of employees to determine interest in ride - shoring; • Designation of a staff member to assist other employees find carpool matches; • Advertising and promotions to generate interest and viability for the program; • Tailoring of work hours to facilitate ride - shoring; o Provision of preferentially located or priced parking for corpoolers; - • Leasing of vans, of cost, for employees who vanpool; • Provision of company fleet cars at nominal cast for commuting by carpoolers; and • Subsidization of subscription bus services, particularly in the early period of formation. VI -81 c) Modified Work Hours — Modified work hours may involve flex -time programs (where employees ore free to set their own work hours around a specified core period) or staggered work hours (where work hours of different employee groups are staggered by say, 15 or 30 minute intervals). Both programs attempt to reduce the amount of peak period traffic by spreading employee arrivals and departures over a longer period. Daily traffic is unaffected. Both programs are applicable to office and industrial employment sites. However, where a multiplicity of employers is present, such as envisioned in the Industrial Area, some spreading of commute times naturally occurs without_ the need for a formal program. This could be monitored by the City in the future to ensure that such spreading occurs. d) Bicycle Facilities -- Rancho Cucamonga's relatively flat terrain and dry climate are particularly conducive to bicycling. However, only a relatively few commuters live close enough to work and are willing or able to expend the necessary physical effort to bicycle to work on a regular basis. Also, bicycle usage drops off rapidly during inclement weather and when darkness sets in early, so that bicycling has only limited potential as a year -round mitigation measure. Nevertheless, introduction of barriers to bicycling, such as lack of safe bicycling routes, should be avoided in the future. Positive steps to encourage bicycling should be taken by Industrial Area employers, including on -site provision of secure, well - located bike storage facilities. e) On -Site Employee Services -- A significant amount of traffic over the day is generated by employees driving to banks, restaurants and the like. Land use polices that provide for such services within walking distance of employment concentrations will therefore be effective in reducing total Industrial Area traffic over the day (less in the peak period). Provision by employers of on -site services can accomplish the some purposes. In this study, calculated employment levels were reduced by 10 percent to account for inter -mixed commercial site catering to walk -in business by Industrial Area employees. C VI -82 RESPONSE TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH Comments were received from the Olfice of Planning and Research on December 10, 1981, approximately two weeks after the 45 day review period on the Draft EiR expired. In addition, and most importantly, the comments were addressed to the Redevelopment Plan and redevelopment process in general and were not at all germaine to the Draft Environmental impact Report. There were no comments on environmental impacts or mitigation measures; rather, the comments addressed fiscal impacts on taxing agencies, time frames for redevelopment activities, financing schedules and alternative financing mechanisms. These comments were offered as suggestions on the Plan, not comments or concerns on the Draft El R. OT V AV n e urun rrTr a UAW!e STAFF REPORT R, U T December 16, 1981 1977 TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Managerij4' RE: Alta Loma School District /Request for Crossing Guard 19th 8 Cartilla - Deer Canyon School The City has received a request for an additional crossing guard at 19th and Cartilla Streets beginning January 4, 1982. The Engineering Department states that based on a projected student population the "warrants" are met to justify a crossing guard at this location. In addition, the school district has agreed to fund >* the cost for the crossing guard at this location. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the City Council authorize the addition of one crossing guard for the Deer Canyon School at 19th and Cartilla and authorize the appropriation of s of the necessary funds from the City's reserve contingency fund, Currently crossing guards are compensated at an hourly rate of $4.14 per hour. The approximate cost for the City's share of the additional crossing guard's salary is $2,000 for an entire school year. JHR /vz Enclosure Alta Loma School District 9350•F Baseline Road • Poet Office Box 370 • Alta Loma, California 91701 • 714/987.0766 Established 1685 BOARD OF TRUSTEES December 15, 1981 ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W. TANGEMAN MRS, LIZ G.ALL.ARINI MRS. SANDRA A. OERLY JOHN C. BOOK City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman Subject: Request for Crossing Guard 19th and Cartilla Streets Dear Sir: The Alta Loma Schaal District requests the placement of a crossing guard at 19th and Cartilla Streets, beginning January 4, 1982. JOHN E. McMURTRY Svpr nrmdmr FLOYD M. STORK Po MneUSupport Se m SIACY NELSON 8..i st S'n,im MILLY STRAIN Curnmlum/SpM l Pmle The City's Engineering Department has determined that the crossing meets all the City's criteria for a crossing guard. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT ® ,/� Floyd M. Stork Administrator Personnel and Support Services FMS /jh FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared By: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Redevelopment Agency and Municipal Services, Inc, 1661 Hanover Road Suite 215 City of Industry, California 91748 A Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project was published on October 12, 1981 in the Daily Report. The Draft EIR was circulated for review at that time to those organizations and persons included on the list found in the Appendix of the Draft EIR (this list was also used for the Notice of Preparation mailing). The review period expired on November 26, 1981 and the only comment received was from the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission. In addition, there is a response to the West End Resource Conservation District of the Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. The District responded to the Rancho Redevelopment Plan rather than the Draft EIR and because their concerns were environmental, they have been addressed as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report. RESPONSE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The Planning Commission expressed concern that the mitigation measures in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Plan were not -" as strong as those previously adopted in the General Plan EIR, Victoria Community Plan EIR, and Industrial Specific Plan EIR. Of particular concern are the measures intended to mitigate impacts on air quality. The following response presents information which addresses the Planning Commission's concerns. The Draft Environmental impact Report an the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project is a supplement to the Environmental impact Report certified by the City Council for the General Plan. In addition, information from the Victoria Community Plan EIR and Industrial Specific Plan EIR have been incorporated by reference into the Draft EIR on the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. The California Environmental Quality Act, Laws and Guidelines (1981) specifically states: 'The EIR on a general plan may he used as the foundation document for EIRs subsequently proposed for specific projects within the geographic area covered by the general plan. The subsequent EIRs may reference and summarize material in the EIR on the general plan for the description of the general environmental setting and as much of the description of the environmental impacts as applies to the specific project. detailed information in the EIR on the specific project may be limited to a description of the project, the specific environmental setting, and those impacts which are not adequately described for the specific project in the EIR on the general plan ..... The purpose of this section is not to restrict analysis of environmental issues but is to avoid the necessity for repeating detail from the General Plan EIR." The Draft EIR on the Rancho Redevelopment Plan summarizes information from the General Plan EIR and presents additional information when necessary to adequately describe and assess the Redevelopment Plan. The mitigation measures were also summarized and presented in the Draft EIR. In addition, the Redevelopment Plan In itself is a strong mitigating measure in that objectives of the Plan include the provision of various public improvements intended to eliminate significant impact identified in previously certified EIRs. The Rancho Redevelopment Plan is being proposed as a means to implement many of the goals and objectives stated in the General Plan. It is a financing vehicle, which if adopted, can provide the Agency and City with funds to assist in providing needed public improvements. The Rancho Redeveloment Plan conforms to the General Plan as previously determined by the Planning Commission and, therefore, growth impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan also pertain to the Redevelopment Pro)ect Area. The Redevelopment Plan will not create new impacts or enhance impacts previously disclosed. It may, however, shorten the time in which certain impacts are expected to occur which is the main reason environmental concerns were addressed. Additional research has been done on measures to mitigate air quality impacts. In addition, a summary of existing and proposed mitigation measures for each environmental impact, discussed in the Draft EIR, has been included. Air Quality The Draft EIR states in the Mitigation Measures section "measures have been adopted as part of the General Plan in the form of policies to encourage energy conservation and to implement the Air Quality Management Plan." These above- referenced measures are policies contained in the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan and the General Plan specifically states that they shall serve as the City's general policies on air quality. Accompanying this response are sections from the Air Quality Management Plan for the Valley Portion of San Bernardino County and the Air Quality Management Plan for the entire South Coast Basin. The Plan for San Bernardino County was prepared in 1978 to be incorporated into the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan and to provide air quality control tactics which could be implemented by local governments in San Bernardino County and which were chosen based upon their potential for implementation. These air quality control tactics may be implemented by the Redevelopment Agency as well as the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan also contains tactics for air quality control and the attached excerpt compares all of the subregional air quality control measures. This attachment was included to indicate the wide range of air quality control ATTACHbrAM7S fXGE�P1 r-av -1 'T} AiK- QUA,. -Cl uAU14C�EYt61lr pAt4 foL vau.01 Pof-nou of -! >AW M— KIAf —!blNO Gouur( C MITEL IV RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the analysis conducted by staff and the discussions held over the past several months with the County AQMP Coordi- nating Committee, recommendations are included in this report. It is intended that the many cities, districts, and agencies within San Bernardino County, as well as the County itself, will review the list of recommended air quality control measures de- scribed in Appendix D as potentially feasible, and then select _ certain specific measures for implementation within their juris- diction. Since each local jurisdiction has varied financial, political, and physical environments, no single County -wide pro- gram of control measures.is proposed. Rather jurisdictions will be encouraged to build an effective local program by choosing from the "menu" in Appendix D. The recommended tactics fall into four main categories: I. Transportation Measures 2. Energy Conservation Measures 3. Local Government Actions 4. Land Use Measures Within each category, the air quality mitigation tactics are grouped into strategies. Each strategy is a number of separate tactics which collectively attack a particular aspect of the pollution problems. The strategies include the following: Transportation Strategies 1. Implement a Comprehensive Traffic Flow Program 2. Analyze and improve transit services. 3. Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance. II. Energy Conservation strateg ies I. Implement a local agency energy conservation program. 2. Implement a residential energy conservation program. 3. Implement an industrial /commercial energy conservation program. III. Local Agency Control Strategies 1. Reduce emissions from sources directly under local agency control. IV. Land Use strate ies . Implement changes to General Plan. 2. Implement changes to development ordinances. To determine specific tactics, who would implement them, and their relative costs and benefit,the reader should refer to appendix D. Transportation Strategies These tactics all address the reduction of air Pollution by reducing vehicle emissions. This is done by improving traffic flow by provi- ding effective alternative transit servic es, and by requiring vehicle maintenance and inspection. 24 Other than the vehicle inspection program, each of the tactics in this category has limited potential for reduction of emissions. However, if several were to be implemented as a package noticable impacts could be achieved. In addition, other benefits could be realized, such as decreased gasoline consumption, more efficient traffic flow, and more effective transit services. Those which appear to be most feasible at this time include: 1) removing unwanted stop signs, 2) forming a county -wide traffic coordinating committee, 3) providing buses at additional bus stops, 4) freeway fliers from San Bernardino to E1 Monte or Los Angeles, .. 5) legislative changes allowing bus service between San Bernardino and downtown Los Angeles; and 6) providing shuttle bus service be- tween major employment centers and CBD's. Other tactics which were found to require further study, or to be infeasible at this time include: 1) improved signalization, 2) providing bus shelters at additional bus stops, 3), public awareness, 4) park and ride facili- ties; and 5) mandatory inspection and maintenance programs of motor vehicles. There may be some mechanism for implementation of some of these measures already in existence. Removal of unwanted stop signs would be determined by city, County, State and Federal governments. The present SANBAG Transportation Technical Committee could expand its role to review improved traffic flow as a means to reduce air pollution. SANSAG and Omni -Trans are already scheduled to install new benches at bus stops in the future, but additional benches could be provided if reducing air pollution was added as an additional means of estimating cost - effectiveness. The legislature could be utilized to provide t:e necessary legislative changes allowing national carriers i.e. Trailways, etc., to provide bus service be- tween San Bernardino and downtown Los Angeles, while Omni- Trans, or the Riverside Transit Authority, or the Southern California Rapid Transj.t District could be called upon to provide freeway flyer service between San Bernardino and E1 Monte or downtown Los Angeles. Energy Conservation Str&tegies These tactics appear to be the most promising measures for wide- spread implementation. This is due to the fact that they not only reduce air pollution emissions by reducing the demand for fuel - burning power plants, but they also reduce our consumption of our fuel resources and reduce our expenditures for electricity and gas consumption. These tactics include such things as insulation, water use controls, building design changes, and public education. All are aimed at reducing consumption of energy. The following similar energy conservation tactics were found to be the most feasible at this time: 1) installation of insulation, 2) utilization of solar energy systems, 3) utilizing low flow re- strictors, 4) landscaping with draught resistant plants, 5) control- ling temperatures, 6) public education programs, 7) controlling lighting, and 8) controlling driving habits. There were some tactics which are either infeasible at this time, or require further study: 1) retrofitting with insulation or flow restriz tors in existing local agency buildings, 2) utilizing natural. lighting and differ- ent street lighting systems, 3) changing work hours or vacation schedules, and 4) reviewing solid /sewage waste practices. Implementation of those measures found to be feasible are rela- tively easy with most costs to be absorbed by the individuals who implement the tactics, however, some cost would be passed on to the ultimate consumer. Installation of insulation would be adopted by the appropriate levels of government. Utilization of solar energy systems, flow restrictors, and landscaping with drought resistant plants would be accomplished in the same manner as insulation above. Controlling temperature settings and light- ing systems would be performed by the user of the individual sys- tems. Installation of drivers' checklists would be the responsi- bility of the individual vehicle fleet owners. Any administrative requirements instructing employees to reduce the number of vehicle trips would come from employers. Local Acencv Control Strategies This category includes such tactics as utilizing low emission equipment for necessary functions, installing pollution devices an existing equipment, and inventory local sources of pollution. All of these tactics are aimed at making local officials aware of the pollution caused by public agency operation and attempting to limit it. The impact of these tactics is limited, but they appear to be cost - effective and also allow government to set the example in controlling pollution. The only tactic found to be feasible at this time is the inspection of equipment that is under the control of local agencies. The other tactics,(i.e., retrofitting with pollution control devices and re- placing existing polluting equipment with newer, less polluting equipment) may or nay not be needed based upon the outcome of any inspection program. Local agencies could either conduct the inspection program with present staff or by contract with a private firm. Any decision to retrofit existing equipment, or purchase any new equipment would be the responsibility of the local agency. Land Use Strategies This group of tactics includes those actions available to cities and counties which would permit them to incorporate into their general plans and development codes a means to reduce the use of energy and automobiles and, thereby, to reduce emissions. The use of land use controls to reduce air pollution was the basic premise of the San Bernardino County Air Quality Plan adopted in 1976. The L., L!,, .uvmmended at this time are compatible with 26 and in addition to the measures suggested in the 1976 plan. The earlier plan was a widely acclaimed first step in identifying what local governments can do to control air pollution and its effects. Those earlier recommendations remain quite valid and provide a foundation upon which this air quality management plan and related programs can build. The land use control measures specifically recommended in this document include, primarily, tactics which incorporate measures to reduce automobile travel into local general plans and develop- ment codes. While the actual implementation of VMT minimization measures would be the responsibility of individual developers, the requirement and review of any proposed measures would be accomplished oy the local . planning departments. Adoption of any required ordinance or code would be by the appropriate level of government. Local governments could also include VMT incorporation.in circula- tion elements as they revise or submit new circulation elements for their general plans. These tactics are intended as long -term solutions and it is doubt- ful they would produce any immediate results. However, these do provide a tool for local governments to use for combating not only air pollution but also to provide their citizens with alternative life styles and more efficient communities. Another role local government could play in controlling air pollu- tion would be to provide a thorough environmental analysis of large regional events and projects which have substantial air quality im- pacts. Proposals such as the 1984 Olympic Games, the "Expo 81" exhibition, or the SOHIO Pipeline and its related shipping facili- ties are examples of projects which have substantial air quality implications for the entire South Coast Basin. Adequate analysis and mitigation of these impacts is necessary in a truly effective air quality management program. Failure to do so would negate many of the efforts made in the other tactics suggested throughout this plan. Increased State and Federal Assistance Air pollution can not be solved by any one level of government act- ing independently. This is due to the fact that smog ignores poli- tical boundaries and because of the complex and expensive nature of the solutions available. The recent passage of Proposition 13, Tax Limitation Initiative, further weakens the financial capability of local governments. Therefore, there is an increasing need for financial, legislative and enforcement support from State and Federal government. 27 The United States Environmental Protection Agency should be called upon to assist in locat efforts. Since local air quality efforts are primarily directed toward attainment of EPA standards, it seems reasonable to expect EPA assistance in such areas as planning and imolementation grants and feasibility research. This research would study the feasibility of such things as alternative fuel sources for automobiles and power plants, emission control devices, and energy reduction tactics. ,. Since a great share of our pollution is generated by the automobile,._.. pressure should be applied to Congress to impleme.:t tightened vehicle emission standards upon the automobile industry. Local government has not control over this process. Federal emission standards for aircraft, ships and trains also need to be developed and enforced. Pollution Reduction Goals It may be useful for the State and Federal government-to set speci- fic reduction goals for portions of each region. Such goals could be established for parts of counties or even for cities. Reliance upon these goals could be useful in ensuring that each jurisdiction is doing its fair share in reducing air pollution. These goals could be either attainment of a standard or the elimination of a given amount of emissions. In addition, it could be. productive to provide incentives for attain- ing the goals set rather than merely threatening potential sanctions against non - complying areas. if, for instance, a local government were to implement a tactic to design streets with more efficient traffic flow, then the State and Federal goverment could provide incentive grant funds to install synchronized traffic signal systems. This approach would be more positive than the threat of potential sanctions. Congress has earmarked 69 million dollars for air quality planning and implementation in the next fiscal year. 'It is critical that the state and local governments receive their share of these funds in order to put into action the AQMP recommendations. The state also has funds controlled by the Air Resources Board that could be used to assist local governments. It should be implied that local government want to give up their local governments want to give up their local roles and responsi- bilities, but rather that the state and federal governments should assist local governments when called upon to do so. 28 APPENDLX -C LAND USE MEASURES I. Name of Strategy: Implement Changes to General Plans Reduction Implementing Potential Tactics A. Circulation Element 1. Locate trans- portation corridors so as to reduce VMT. 2. Incorporate VM'P reduction in General Plan B. Land Use - clement 1. Adopt codes and ordinances allowing com- mercial establis ".cents to be more accessible to residential areas. Agency County, cities ANC 2754 CO 1420# NOX 349`, County, cities RHC 175$ CO 800# NOX 210# County, cities RHC 380# CO 2065# NOX 380# 2. Locate commercial and County, cities'R9C 315# industrial activities with high CO 20400 rate of VMT between them close NOX 380# together, i.e., trip type districts, etc. 3. Design communities County, cities R.HC 220$ with relatively high density CO 1240# to reduce driving and trip NOX 240# lengths and to facilitate transit use. Who Pays Cost Local government. $5,_000- $7,500 2 man-months for study. Local government. 5500 -$2,C Local government. $500 -$2,0 locate government/commerce and industry. $5,000- $25,00 Local government. $10,000- $25,000 for design. RHC 135# 4. Identify centers for County, cities CO 805; Local government. $500 -$2,0 nonresidential land uses. NOX 1350. RHC 195# 5. Dispense nonresiden- County, cities CO 11000 Local government. $S,000- tial uses into the neighbor- NOX, 1950. $25,000 hood environment. RHC 1695x' CO 8670# Social and Environmental Imnlications NOX 1655# All tactics are environmentally acceptable. Social implications are harder to assess as some minimal change to life styles may be necessary. Comoatibilitv with General Plans Due to the changes required, alterations to general plans will be required to allow General Plans to include these tactics. Relationship with Other Strateaies Relates well with transportation measures and with charges to development ordinances. C -1 LAND USE MEASURES II. Name of Strategy_ Implement Changes to Development Ordinances (zoning and Subdivision Code) Tactics A. Have Planning Commissions adopt conditions on Conditional Use Permits requiring energy conservation or air pollution control measures. B. Incorporate VMT mini- mization measures into new developments (narrow streets, internal walkways and bikeways, school sites in development, etc.) Implementing Agency County, cities Reductioh Potential Undetermined. Depends on what energy conserva- tion or air polliu- tion control measures are implemented. county, cities Undetermined. Depends on what mean _s are implemented. Range of Cost Undetermined. Depend on what energy cqn- se nation or air pollution control measures are implemented. Undetermined. Presently, there is 6210,000 for con- structing bikeways in the County. Decreasii street widths of a 2,700 foot cul -de -sac from 32' to 26' saved $16,200 and 38,232 therms of energy. Social and Environmental Implications Both are socially and envircrmentally acceptable. May result in minimal life style charges, but they should have positive impacts. Compatibility with General Plans Any, conflict would be resolved as Plans are amended. Relationship with Other Strategies Relates well with the tactics and would be very supportive of changes required to General Plans. ' C -2 TRANSPORTATION NEASU11MS I. Name of Strategy Implement a Comprehensive Traffic Flow Program. List of Tactics Implementing'Agency Reduction Who Pays/ Potential Cost Range A. Improved signalizatioin State, county, cities . An: 7235,#. State, county, cities Study signaling and make them CO 1603900 $60,000 for a brand more efficient to move vehi- NOX 2410,4 new signal system. cles as exoedisously as possible. (Speed improved -� from 10 mph to 15 mph @ ' 15,000 A= B. Reduce number Of stop State, county, cities RHC 28954 State, county, cities signs. Study stops and re- CO .41965# $150 for each removal; move those that are not NOR 1445 +# necessary for safety, or ' impede traffic flow. (Improved speed 25 -30 mph, (18,000 ADT) C. Establish a County- State, county, cities RFC 14,1000 County, cities wide traffic coordinating CO 232,700# Utilize existing committee. (25 -35 mph speed 'NOX 10,550+3 staff. improvement, 30,000 ADT)(USe existing SA ° G Comlittees) RHC 242,3000 CO. 435,055# NO" 2,410'# Social and Environmental Implications All are social s environmentally acceptable. Lost fuel economy from stop /go traffic is overcome less time•is lost in idling as traffic flow is Improved, and less pollu- tion is given off as traffic flow is smooth without unnecessary idling. Conpatibility with General Plans No conflict Relationship with other Strategies Very supportive of energy oonseration tactics C -3 TRANSPORTATION MEASURES II. Name of Strategy:.Analyze, improve and expand Transit Services Social 6 Environmental Implications All tactics are socially and environmentally sound. Single occupancy vehicle dependancy is reduced as people move from their cars and into buses. As people depend on the freeway flyer, freeway congestion is reduced. Tactics Implementing Agency Reduction Who pays/ . Potential Cost Range A. Provide bus shel- Omni -Trans RHC 375: Omni -Trans ' ters and benches CO 21008 $75,000 NOX 3758 B. Provide shuttle Omni -Trans RAC 120$ Consumer bus service be- CO 5658 $.10 - .15/ tween employment NOX 1308 person /one way centers and CBD, trip- include a down- town loon service. C. Establish park/ Caltrans, local RHC 27758 State, County ride facilities jurisdictions CO 104408 or City for vehicle pool- $50,000 to.build ing. lot for 30 -40 cars. Excludes land. D. Improve routing Southern California RHC 140008 Consumer $2.15/ and scheduling of Rapid Transit Dis- CO 555008 person /one way freeway flyer from trict NOX 190008 trip San Bernardino to Los Angeles. E. Legislative change State Legislature RHC 70008 $1,500 - $2,500 Eliminate compe- CO 280001 , ' tition restraints NOX 95008 between regional , and national bus lines. F. Expand public Caltrans, Omni -Trans RHC 12008 Caltrans awareness of CO 60008 $130,730 Caltrans transit services. NOX 15008 grant in use now . TOTAL REDUCTION: RHC 254704 CO 1026008 NOX 34470 Social 6 Environmental Implications All tactics are socially and environmentally sound. Single occupancy vehicle dependancy is reduced as people move from their cars and into buses. As people depend on the freeway flyer, freeway congestion is reduced. Comoatibilitv with General Plans No Conflict Relationship with other strategies Compatible with strategies aimed at reducing energy use and with land use density strategies'. C -5 TRANSPORTATION NFASURES III. Name of strategy: Vehicle. Inspection and Maintenance Tactic Implementing Agency Reduction Who Pays/ Potential Cost Range Support mandatory California Air Unknown, but Individual car inspection and maintenance Resources Board 35% of the owner. of vehicle air pollution cars inspected $14.00 per vehicle emission devices. might be inspection, expected to exclusive of repairs fail, thus needed repairs would, reduce _ vehicle emissions. Social and Ensironmentai a 3.1 ' No eavircr,aen.o' '�.oDlums �. pe a in the automobile necessitates that air poll•:cion moi it r. rd.c,,um. There may be a problem with social ar .;.g an ad b: re .hrou51 effective public education. -ai �_tation and energy conservation strategies. a c -6 LOCAL AGENCY CONTROL I. Name of Strategy: To Reduce Emissions from Sources Directly Under Iocal Agency Control Reduction Implementing potential Who Pays Tactic Agency Cost Rarige A. Inspect all equipment County, cities None that emit air pollution that are directly under local agency control. Local government. 2 man - months at $2,000+ 510,01. R. Retrofit existing equip- County, cities, Depends on Depends on individual costs ment that are directly under individual effective- of specific control devices, local agency control with air entities ness of pollution control devices where ' found to be fea3 able. _control devices implemented C. Replace existing equip- County, cities, Depends on Depends on costs of replace- ment by establishing low individual new equip- ment items. emission standards and high entities meat that is energy efficiency as addi- procured. _ tional selection criteria. D. Other items to be dis- cussed under energy conservation strategy. Social and Environmental Implications All tactics that would be implemented should be socially and environmentally acceptable. Before any specific tactic is done, the-social and environmental implications should be determined. Compatibility with General Plans There should be no conflict, but again it should be determined before individual tactics are implemented. .' Relationship with Other Strategies - Should be used in conjunction with energy conservation strategies. C -7 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 1. Name of Strategy: Implement a Local Agency Energy Conservation Program Implementing Reduction List of Tactics Agency Potential A. Insulation ' 1. Encourage the use of insulation where electric resistance heaters are utilized. B. Solar Energy 1. Encourage retrofitting existing buildings with solar energy systems. W 2. Encourage tax incentives for solar energy use. ` C. Water Conservation 1. Encourage /Require reftofitting existing buildings with water flow restrictors. 2. Encourage and/or require on new develoL rents landscaping with drought resistant plants. 0. Tcmoerature Controls 1. Require night thermostat setbacks 2. Encourage facilitating the use of fresh air for ventilation. Local agency Energy savings . NC� - 10# PT 5 @ 50.1 - 10# stack HC 0 Local agency Energy savings 110 - 13,600# PT 1,7000 502 - 75# CO 3,400# State /Local Energy savings government NO - 13,6000 PT 1,7000 502'- 75# CO 3,400# Local agency Energy savings NO - 100 PT 11 sox - 150 CO 0# Local agency - Energy savings NO - 100. PT 59 .' so2 - 101 Stack HC 0# Local agency Energy savings NO - 5,600# PT 7009 sox - 30# CO 1,400# Local agency Energy savings NOx - 2,8000 PT 350# E02- 15@ CO 700# Who Pays 6 Cost' Range Local Agency $500 - $1500 Local agency $0,000 - $10,000 Space heating; $1,500 - $2,000, Water heating. Up to 55♦ of 1st $3,000 can be deducted. Local agency. $100 - $500. No additional None None List of Tactics' D. Temperature Controls (continued) 3. Encourage thermostat settings at 68 F winter, 7e - BOo F summer. 4. Require relaxing dress codes, i.e., open collars, etc. E. Public education 1.. Encourage making energy conserva- tion hints available to taxpayers and other citizens. F. Lighting /Electricity 1. Encourage using natural lighting in plants and buildings where feasible. 2. Acquire having janitorial, staff light only immediate work area. 3. Acquire reviewing of street lighting system to determine if the same service can be provided with lower energy consumption. 4. Encourage banning the wasteful use of. energy, i.e., unnecessary lighting, fountains, etc. G. Time /Driving 1. Encourage instituting flexible hours to avoid driving during peak hours.. Implementing Agency Local agency Local agency Local agency Local agency Local agency Local agency Local agency. Local agency Reduction who Pays 6 Potential Cost Range Energy savings NOx - 13,6008 PT 1,700# S02 - 758 CO 3,4001 Energy savings NO, - $9,200 PT 7,4001 501 - 3359 CO 14,8001 Energy savings NO, - 301 PT 101 S02 - 351 Stack HC 50 Energy savings NO, - 104 PT 58 S02 - 51. Stack HC 04 NOx - 1000 PT 251 S02 - 1151 Stack HC 10# Reduced energy consumption: NOx - 1001 PT 251 S02 - 1151 Stack HC 108 Reduces congestion and accompanying pollution. None None Local agency $11000 - $5,000. Local agency $500 - $1,500. None Net savings $.11 /lamp Net savings None., Name of Tact[rs 2. Encourage coordinating vacation schedules of employees to coincide with periods of greatest air pollu- tion potential Implementing Agency Local agency 3. Require the Development of adminis- Local agency trative procedures requiring employee to telplione or write instead of driving whenever possible. 4. Require installation of driver checklists for energy conservation driving habits in all vehicles. f ' c Il. Solid /Sewa,tr, waste Reduction Potential If People take vacation away from SCAR, may reduce pollution, in basin. Feduce gas consumption and accompanying air pollution Local agency Reduces fuel consumption and aec- 1- panying air pollution. Who Pays 6 Cost Range None Local agency $100 - $500 Local agency $250 - .$1,000 1. Encourage analyzing and modi- Local agency May reduce energy consumption of local agency fying solid waste /sewage waste vehicles and refuse may be used 6 man - months for collection and dispoaal practices for as alternative.fuel. study at $10 - maximum energy saving. . $35,000 for study Plus cost of imple mentation of recommendations Social and Environmental Implications ' The only social implications may result from relaxing dressing, but should be.easily resolved. Environmentally, all tactics are highly acceptable and favor energy conservation. Compatfbility with General Plans No conflict nelntionshin with Other Strategies Most effective if used concurrently with energy conservation strategies involved both residential and commercial /industrial sectors. ENERGY CONSER, iION II. Implement a Residential Energy Conservation Program Tactic Implementing Agency Reduction Potential Who Pays 6 Cost Range A. Insulation S02 3009 2. Encourage retrd- Homeowner Saves energy .1. Adopt code cLange Homeowner Energy Savings strictors in homes S02 130# requiring adequate NOX PT 0,1009 Homeowner insulation in S02 3651 CO 16,2009 $300 -500 attics D. Solar Energy 3 Eacouratjd the use Government encourages Saves energy oP -solar energy developer imple.aents NOX 35,6001 PT 4 4501 Homeowner SOZ Oju1 CO 8,900# $5,000 -61000 Space heating $1,500 -2,000 Water heating n Z. Adopt codes pre - Local government Saves energy venting homeowners NOX 35,600# PT 4,4500 Local government from banning solar S02 2009 CO 0,900# $50 -100 energy system on aesthetic grounds C. Water Conservation 1. Require Low flow State /local government Reduces energy standards in new homes NOX 265# S02 3009 2. Encourage retrd- Homeowner Saves energy fitting of flow re- NOX 135# strictors in homes S02 130# PT 65# In purchase pric Stack 11C 201 $100 -200 PT 35# Homeowner Stack HC 10# $100 -200 II. ple,_.nt a Residential Energy Conservation Prog. .n (continued), ` Tactic Implementing Agency Reduction Potential Who Pays b Cost Range . D. Tempature Controls ' 1. Require reducing State Reduces natural gas use tempature setting on NOx 12,000# PT 1,500# new water heaters S02 701 CO 3,000 #. None 2. Encourage set back Homeowner of space heating 100 at night E. -Lighting /Electricity 1. Encourage banning Romeowner use of unnecessary lighting and energy Reduces natural gas use TiO 64,800) PT 8,100# SO2 365# CO 16,200# Saves mercy NO LJ# PT 15# sox 701 Stack HC 51 Net savings Net savings Social and Environmental Implications All tactics are environmentally acceptable. May be a social problem with preventing homeowners groups from banning solar energy systems on aesthetic grounds. _ Compatibility with General Plans No conflict. Relationship with Other Strategies This strategy would be most effective if used concurrently with local agency and commercial /industrial energy conservation strategies. III, implement an Industrial /Commercial Energy Conservation Program Tactic Implementing Reduction Agency potential A. Insulation 1. Encourage the use of sufficient Individual Saves energy. insulation where electric resistance company NOx - 901 PT 251 heaters are used. S02 - 1051 Stack 1C1 U. Solar Energy 1. Encourage the use of solar energy Individual Saves energy systems in new developments. company NOx - 60,4004 PT 7,5509 502 - 3d51 Stack Ile 15,100# C. Water Conservation w 1. Encourage retrofitting existing buildings with flow restrictors. 2. Require low flow standards in new buildings, 3. Encourage /require landscaping with drought resistant plants, D. Temperature Control 1. Encourage using fresh air for ventilation. 2. Encourage relaxing dressing standards. i_e., open collars, etc. Company Saves water a energy NOx - 1959 PT SO S02 - 2201 Stack NC 159 Company Saves water 6 energy Nox -125 0 PT 309 S02 -14009 stack EC 109 Company Saves water G energy NO, - BOO PT 204 S02 - 901, Stack nC 59 Company NO - 10,00'09 PT 1,2509 • SO - 550. CO 2,5008 Company Saves energy NO - 51200# PT 6509 • SO - 304 CO 1,3009 Who Pays 6 Cost Range Company $350 - $1,500 Company $6,000 - $10,000 Space heating $1,500 - $2,000 water heating Company $100 - $200 Company $200 Developer $200 - $1,000 Nona .None III. implement an Industrial /Commercial Energy Conservation Program (continued) • Implementing - Reduction Tactic Agency Potential 3. Encourage reducing temperature Company setting to 680 F. winter /780 - 800 F. summer. E. Public Education 1. Encourage /squire appliance effi- Companies ciency labeling. 2. Encourage making conservation Utility hints available to taxpayers and other companies citizens PT 35T f S02 - . F. Lighting /Electricity Stack NC 104 P 1., . Encourage banning the wasteful use Company of energy, i.e., unnecessary lighting, . fountains, etc. 2. Encourage requiring janitorial staff Company to light only immediate work area. 3. Encourage review of parking lot Company lighting to see if same service can PT 354 be provided with less energy. 80 - C. Time/Driving 1. Encourage requiring employees to Company write or telephone .instead of writing - whenever possible. Saves energy NO, - 20,0004 S02 - 1154 Saves electricity NOx - 2854 502 - 3204 Saves natural gas U0, - SU,•70o S02 - 2854 Energy savings PT 2,5004 CO $loco PT :704 Stack 254 PT 6,300. CO 12,600 NO - 1454 PT 354 S02 - 1604 Stack HC 104 Electricity Reduction NOx : 154. PT 54 S02 - 154 Stack tic 04 Who Pays & Cost Range Net savings Consumer $1,00 - $4.00 add on price of appliance Consumer in monthly bill. $.10 - $.25 eac Company, net savings Company,- net savings. Reduces energy use Company NO. - 145k PT 35T $150 - $250 S02 - 1604 Stack NC 104 for review net • savings of $.11 . per lamp Reduce energy use Company NO - 1454 PT 354 $500 - $1,000 80 - 1609 Stack HC 104 yearly savings III. Implement an Industrial/Commercial Energy Conservation Program (continued) Social and Environmental Imolications No environmental conflicts or problems. May be some resistance to zeiaxinq dress codes, but should be easily A resolved. I r u+ Compatibility with General Plans No conflicts. Relationship with Other Strategies Can be most effective when used concurrently with local agency and residential energy conservation strategies. Implementing Reduction Who Pays S Tactic Agency Potential Cost Range 2. Encourage institution of flex -hours Company Reduces congestion and Company accompanying air pollution None ' 3. Encourage installation of driver Company Encourage average conserving Company checklists for energy conservation in conserving habits $1.00 - $2.00 each vehicle. each checklist Social and Environmental Imolications No environmental conflicts or problems. May be some resistance to zeiaxinq dress codes, but should be easily A resolved. I r u+ Compatibility with General Plans No conflicts. Relationship with Other Strategies Can be most effective when used concurrently with local agency and residential energy conservation strategies. APPENDIX L AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Land use Measures Implement Changes to General Plans Tactic Tons Reductions Cost Range Cost/ Ton Economic Social Environ- w ntal Feasible ,Recommenda- tion for Zmoiementati A. Circulation Element 1. Tiansportation 1.02 $5,000 - $4,900 - + + + No corridor 7,500 7,3 °3 2. VMr Incorpora- .60 $500 - $830 - + + tion 2,000 3,300 + + Yes D. Land Use Element '0 1• CO mrce More 1.4 $500 - $350 - + ? Assessible 2,000 1,425 + + flusher , Study 2. Trip Types 1.3 $5,000 - $3850 - - + + 25,000 19,225 + NO 3. High Density ,85 $10,00 - $11,750 - - _ + - 25,000 29,400 _ No 4. Non- Pesidcntial .54 $500 - $925 - + ? ' ? Centers 2,000 3,700 7 Further Study 5, Non - residential ,74 $5,000 - $6,750 - -- ' Neighborhood 25,000 33,775 - ? ? 7 No n0att4l , •, IK:]alt1VC ui wn q N A. Inspect Equipment B. Retrofit Existing Equipment C. Replace Existing Equipaent T $2,000 - 10,000 ? ? 1 T y Control 0 t 0 0 t - APPENDIX L • AIR MITIGATION TACTICS , Land Use Measures - Irtpleimnt Changes to Developrent Ordinances Tactic Tons Cost Cost/ Economic Social Environ- Feasible Recommenda- Reductions Range Ton mental 1:ion for Implementat A. Conditional Use ? ? ? + + + + Further Permits Study B. W Minimization 7 ? ? i + + + Further Study Measures _ I i q N A. Inspect Equipment B. Retrofit Existing Equipment C. Replace Existing Equipaent T $2,000 - 10,000 ? ? 1 T y Control 0 t 0 0 t APPENDIX L AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Transportation Measures IMPI MNP A NMPR•I1EISIVE TPAFFIC FW1 Pf'OGRTM Tactic Tons ! Cost Cost/ Economic Social Environ- Feasible 1Reconmenda- Reductions Range Ton ire: ntaI tion for Implements' A. Improved Signali- 85 $62,000 $705 + + + + No zation D. Peeve Unwanted .72 $150 $200 + 7 '+ + Yes stops j C. Countywide Coimdttee 5.2 T ? ? + + + Yes -b Analyze and Inprove Existing Transit Services - A. Bus Shelters .48 $1,700 - $3,540 - - + + - No 2,500 5,210 D. Bus Stop Benches 1.0 $300 $800 - + + + Yes 1,000 1,000 C. Freeway Flyer 9.5 $2.15/ $0.23 + .+ + _ + Yes , person D. legislative Change 4.75 $1,500 - $325 - + + + + Yes 2,500 525 E. Public Awareness 4.3 $130,730 430,400 7 + + + No + beneficial 0 neutral - negative ? unknown APPENDIX L AIR MITIGATION TACTICS TranSoortation Feasimts Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance A. Mandatory I 6 M 7 rv,aayz ang an ranslt bery. cps + + No Tactic Tons Cast Cost/ Economic Social Environ- Feasible Recommenda- • A Reductions Range Ton mental tiop for ' Energy System 10,000 11110 _ Implementa A. Shuttle Bus .4 $.10 - .15 $.25 - I + + + + Yes 2,000 .38 + +. + + Yes B. Paris /Ride Facilities 2 $50,000 $25,000 - + + + No Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance A. Mandatory I 6 M 7 $14.00/ 7 + 7 + + No .o inspection 150,000 - + arther St • A 9 $5,000 - $890 - Energy Conservation Ka Un -q— TnnAT. hrrV `V Al. Sufficient Insula- .01 $500 - $50,000 - +. + + No tion 1500 150,000 - B1. Retrofit w /Solar' 9 $5,000 - $890 - Energy System 10,000 11110 1,500 - 165 - 2,000 225 + +. + + Yes 132. Tax Incentives 22 8,000 - $890 - + - _ + - Yes 10,000 1,110 1,500. 165 - 2,000 225 Cl. Petroiit Existing .02 $150 $5,000 - } . } Buildings w /lcw - 500 25,000 {. No Flar Re;trictors + ocna:Iclal 0 neutral aan - APPENDIX S AIR MITIOATION TACTICS Tactic Tons Reductions Cost Range cost/ Ton Economic Social Environ- montal Feasible. Recomrienda tion for Implementa G2. Coordinate Vaca- ? 7 7 I ? ? 7 ? Further Sttx tion Schedules 25 $5,000 6 $200 -240 + i + + Yes G3. Administrative ? $100 - ? I + I + + + - Yes Procedures 500 G4_ Driver Checklist 7 $250 - 7 + + + + • Yes D2. Codes Prohibiting 25 1,000 $200 -240 111. Solid/Sewage Waste ? $10,000 - ?' + + + + Further Stu: Disposal 15,000 ' _o 2,000 nesidential Al. Adequate Insula- 45 $300 - $7 - $11 + + + + Yes tion 500 al. Solar Energy Sys- 25 $5,000 6 $200 -240 + + + + Yes terns over $ 60- 80 $100 - 200 D2. Codes Prohibiting 25 $5,000 - $200 -240 Solar Energy 6,000 $ 60- 80 + 7 + + Yes am $500 - - 2,000 Cl. Low Flow Restric- .33 $100 -200 $300 -600 + + + + Yes tars in New Ibnes + beneficial 0 neutral 1 - na ..:ice , APPENDIX i AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Tactic Tons Reductions Cost Range Cost / Ton Economic Social Environ- Feasible �Reconnenda- muntal Lion for ' Implementat: C2. Drought Resistant .Ol 0 C +. + + Yes D1. Night Thermostat 4 0 0 I Setbacks + + + + Yes D2. Fresh Air Venti- 2 0 0 + lation + + + Yes 03. change Tenl�erature 9 0 0 + o Settings + + +. Yes m 04. Ft-lax Dress Code 1 0 0 + ? + + Yes E1. Public Education 40 $1,000 - $25 - + + + 5,000 125 + Yes F1. Natural Lighting .04 $500 - $12,500 + + + 1500 37,500 - + No F2. Light Immediate .01 0 0 + + + Areas + Yes F3. Street Lighting .13 $.11 7 ? + + ? . savings - Further Stud F4. Han Wasteful .13 7 ? 7 + + Energy Use + Yes G1. Institute Flexible ? ? ? ? ? I[ours + + . Further Study beneficial neutral negative unkzyTJn APPENDIX D AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Tactic Tons Reductions Cost Range Cost / Ton Economic Social Environ- mental Feasible �Recon� menda tiop for Implements' C2. Itw Flow in .03 $100 - 200 $3,300 - + I + + + No Existing Homes 6,600 C3. landscape with .05 . 0 0 + + + + Yes Drought resis- tant Plants Dl. Reduce Teulmra- 9 0 0 + + .. + - + Yes turn Settings in Water Heaters . D2. Night Setbacks 45 Net Saving 0 + + + + Yes E1. Dan Wasteful Used .08 Net Saving 0 + + + + Yes Energy 0 J . lxaleficial 0 neutral - negat>.vo ? ' XR] APPENDIX L AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Inplement an Industrial /Ccrnerci.al Energy Conservation Program Tactic Tons Reductions Cost Range Cost/ Ton Economic Social Environ- r.,�r.tal Feasible ,Recommends - tion for Impiementat Al. Sufficient Insula- .12 $350•- $2,900 - _ + tion 1,500 12,000 I + + NO D1. Solar Energy in New Develolxrent 40 $8,000 - $200 - + + + + YeS U , 10,000 250 $500 - $90 - $50 - m 2,000 Cl. Retrofit with .24 :$100 - 200 $400 - 800 + + ++ Yes ,'low Restrictors C3. Flcw Restrictom .24 $100 - 200 $400 - 800 + + - + +- Yes in New Develop - rent C3. Drought Resistant .10 0 0 + + + Plants - + yes Dl. Fresh Air for 7 0 0 + + + + Yes Ventilation - D2. Relax Dressing 4 0 0 + ? + + Yes Standards 03. Reduce Tenperature 14 0 0 + + + + Yes Setting E1. Efficiency Iabelin .35 $1.00 -2.00 $285 -550 + + + + .Yes nnnecciat neutral negative APPENDIX Y AIR MITIGATION TACTICS Tactic .._.. Tons Reductions Cost Range Cost/ Ton Economic Social Environ- mental Feasible Reco� mmenda- t.ion for Implementat: E2. Conservation Rints 35 $0.10 - $.Ol - .. 02 + + + 0.15 + Yes Fl. Dan Wasteful .02 Net Savi 0 + i I + + + Yes Energy Use F2. Light irnediate .01 Net Saving 0 + + + + Yes work area F3. Street Lighting .18 $150 - 250 $835 - - + + + Further Study 1,390 G1. Writing, not ? 7 ? + + + + Yes driving G2. Flexible Hours ? 7 7 7 .+ ? + Further Stud G3., Driver's Checklist 7 $1.00 - ? + + + - +- Yes 2.00 a neutrnll ne :ivo x w .. ........... r� AXOI-W fPDM -a* 1-0014 COASf At F- QOauTY t MAN jV40M e9T 'rl.A$ -j F (TABLE X -1) RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES t V AOIiP SUB,pEG(ONAL ELEMENTS < gg a TRANSPORTATION • The measures Included arc Transit Improvement from the plan released by the Park and Ride, X X X X X N -85 city on July 26, 197P - but Subsidize systems X X X X X H -41 have not been approved by the Encourage private participation % X X % N -79, 13. 34 city council. Expand tnansi N•gareMansit X X X % X is -63, 76, 85. 86, 87, 89 Support rail transit X X -4-71, 86 Support exclusive bus lanes in certan corridors X X X H -85 Support regional transit development X X X X 8-63. 85, 89 Support interjurisdictional transfer services X , Transportation Improvement Program % Transit Nana ement And iii%i— encY�mprovamentS Bus shelters X X k H -109 Sus benches X X % H -109 improved scheduling X X X H -63. 89 A RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES T (TABLE x -1j Cont. j a V Apfl SUB - REGIONAL CEMENTS O Z5 y ~ ar, a W iu "cMw 'ai� TRANSPORTATION (cont.) x x x H -13, 34 Expand public awareness Improve transit movement x x x 4-63, 85, 89 Monitor VMT changes x % Rip Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) Subsidize mini mum transit fare structure _ x x x X -al ,rAWrehMslre mHew Of tlx systm x Rideshare Prroo�ram / High ccl! upancy Vehicle Widim" x x x x H- 5,34,41,70, Preferential rkin Da 9 % % x x 79 N -5,70 Use of government vehicles x x H -34 Private sector pa ticipation x x x H- 34.70.79 .Autmbile / Parking dlsintenNirM x x % x H -67 Commuter Computer x x x x H -34 efeferential lane treatment , x x H -85 x 0 r (TABLE X -1) cant. ASURES z FAQM:P5U8-t11DGt1O"1AL ENTS Ww uWfl. �S Ow �u �dw 'd G: iaw aw mw J ¢2 O C Z TRANSPORTATION (cant.) X X H -96 Highway System Improvements Intersection modifications .(improved signal trot an— X X X X X H -35 Removal trf- s to, -0", X N -96 Establish county wide treff)c 'coordinating commitCep X Expand uniform traffic control program X X H -35 Upand treeway.remp metering- X X X RIP BASELINE Expand by- pass - freeways - missing links, X X X RTP BASELINE Use of one -way streets X X H -96 On -street parking limitations X X N -74 Peak period truck restrictions x X H -96, 107 Reversible traffic lanes X H -96 lmproved Traffic Flow Through Special Turning Lanes and Bus Exemptions X H -102 0 x P 11'1 (TABLE X -1) cont. RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES a E AQMP SUB-REGIONAL ELEMENTS z ~J -J mud r TRANSPORTATION (cont.) X H -35, 88 a TM15 TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER Traffic flow Improveeents Transportation Improvrmnt Program X ANOTHER HEADING, Traffic Signal Control I X H -35 Parking Management X H -58 Car -free zones on selected streets Study feasibility of auto control zones - X X X H -58 Encourage improvement of access to major airports I X H -103 e Staggered Work hours/4 day week • X X X X H -4 Revlew of parking facilities X X H- 104,108 Preferential parking for ride share vehicles X X X H -5 Reduced Parking ReRul remen is In Centers X H -106 ' Metering and regulation to encourage short -term parking X 11'1 x V (TABLE % -1) coot. RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES A@W SUB- REGIONAL ELEMENTS F U uuII 2F_ O Or 1Wu ¢w ¢w gWZJ mu TRANSPORTATION (cont.) THIS TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER MOTHER NEADINL Travel Reduction Ban drive -op type-tervtee� X Managing travel demand X X N -13, 68 Use of railroads /pipelines to move goods and corodities X 1 N -73, 84 ♦ Relocating landfill m reddce NMT ; N -111. 115 m ' (TABLE X-1) coot. RELDMIEHDED CONTROL MEASURES 'Y r Y AGtW SUB - REGIONAL ELEMENTS .n •- z v- � o r cz aw 'aW w mw 0 o 3 a2 `c TRANSPORTATION (cant.) Travel Substitutes Voluntary trip reduction programs x H -13 Redevelop neighborhoods /comaunity •bicycle / pedestriaa circulation Vstead /transit.stopp x x x S x H -23, 27 Use.pf PRT systems • x H -85 Improved pedestrian /bicycle -safetya x x x x H -23, 27 Provide secure bicycle storage faGiiities -• x X x x H -23 .GJhuttle services, x x Increased use of mall/phone sheppi'+g ( X H -62 Pricing Measures X x x N -67 a7axing parking', Reimbursemeet of transit fares x H -34, 79 Strict enforcement of 55 Wh Timit x -.Merchant validation prugraw x . x i b T RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES AOMP WD-REGIONAL ELEMEM • J"u aW 0 v� �W 0 J "W gg o2W O °psi >W ox g �� aW ll . JAELE X -l) Cant, ENERGY CONSERVATION • :d1S TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER IWrove efficiency home heating, ANOTHER HEADIN:; cooling and insulation X X X N -2 Support conservation and development of new energy sources X X N- 7,2,3.75 Encourage Wore effic`ent energy usage by commerce /in ustry X S N -1 S.ipeert water cuservaticaw X X X H -2 Support efforts for solid waste conversion to fuel X H -105 • Development of low emission fuel efficient engines X H -113 Develop low-pollution fuels X H -75 Streetlight improvements,0 X X N -• • Landscaping plants resistant and capable of removing pollution X H -110 Solar energy program X X N -3, IS, 20 Retrofit existing buildings -with solar energy systems, X X X N -3 Give-tax -incentives for solar energy.vs X X N -20 n k x 0 W RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES AOMP SUB- REGIONAL ELEMENTS a z <w o §W 0 3W 3 Wm`dW (TABLE X -1) cant. ENERGY CONSERVATION (cont.) a THIS TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER AIiOlHER HEADING ,Use Community Development Block Grant Funds for lower income energy related N -2 H -101 repairs % Lisa natural lighting whenever possible' % X K.I. 2 Have janitorial staff light only H -1 3mmediate.work area x ,Ban wsteful -use of energy. x M -1 Czp4iee appliance- efficitnpy libeling, x �dbrdinate vacation schedules -+ X H-4 Install drive checklists for energy conservation in all vehicles x Analyze and modify solid waste sewage, waste collection and disposal for maximum energy savings x % H -111, 115 .o Glexible work hours /4 day week. x % X H -4 Strict energy conservation in all government buildings x N -1, 19 Increase density level within new developments x x H -99 Revise city building codes % H -95 x rN RECOPMENOED CONTROL MEASURES AOHp SUB - REGIONAL ELEMENTS usW 0 Ws o °� m2W 0 c of aW �W (TABLE x -1) cunt. ENERGY CONSERVATION (cant.) Evaluate local solar energy production and protecting solar rights x M -20 Restructure exterior lighting x x N -1, 2 Reduce non - essential lighting x x N -1, 2 Efficient use of process steam and N -11 2 waste beat x Street design for conservation x N -18 Better insulation- electric* resistance beaten % M -2 Kndscape with drought- resistant plants x Luutback thermostats at night- x x N -2 8elax dmss.cmde x E;gilitate use of fresh -air for ventilation . x % Educate public for energy conservation x x x N -20 Autama tic light shut -off for buildings x N -1 n x N RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES AQNP SUB-REGIONAL ELEMENTS W2 dw W2 'dw o Ow iw p W 6W . (TABLE % -1) cant. ENERGY CONSERVATION (cont.) Building Code Requirements for Natural Heating and Cooling to Non - Residential Buildings X N -1 Energy Efficient Nan, City Buildings E N -19 Comuterized Pooer Allocation X Installation of Efficient Air - Oxygen Transfer Devices % Petroleum Products Administration a Natural Gas Conservation by Recreation and Parks X x i w w n (TABLE % -1) Cont. RECOMMENDED C04TROL MEASURES o ANNP SUB - REGIONAL ELEMENTS z6, LOCAL GOVERNMENT a THIS TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER ANOTHER HEADING Transportation Single - occupancy vehicle H -S, 67,60,69 disincentive % Parking surcharges x x H -67 . Purchase vehicles based on fuel ecunooWlIDWest emissions % % % H -113 . fleet maintenance and• (Mehicle uipment..inspeetton % x H -114 (tetraflt of. agency equi Pasant % MCV1aceRent of agency equlpmenb % % H -113 Palmdale international Airport % RTP BASELINE City Transportation Plan x Energy Conservation Inciu ed Un_ r En Co servation Public information Include Air Duality impacts in driver education programs % H -112 Develop programs for individual effort to improve air quality % % % % x H -1, 2 3 0. 16. 17.)8,(9. Energy conservation programs 20 n x A (TABLE X -1) cont. RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES AVMP SUB- REGIONAL ELEMENTS "z i ¢W 'aw §z zW 8 0 aW LOCAL GOVERNMENT (cant.) ' State - Federal �nndatory - vehicle_ Inspection /wintenant M�aa (pregram• X H -I0, 114 Reduce competitive constraints ,petreen national, regia al. and local transit X Other x N -75 Methane Extraction Monitor development of low-pollution fuels as substitutes for natural gas and petroleum distillates X H -75 Purchasing agent procure combustion equipment designed for law air pollution emission, non - reactive solvents, degreasers and paints X H -93 Participate in AOMD decision making X X 7_11,12,13 Support em"ssion control enforcement X T -13 Promote developnent of "cleaner" Industrial base for counties X T -17 Revise offset rule 1 to I in affected areas X T -2,13 Impose local controls on stationary sources X T -16 x sn n rxx� x sn (TABLE X -1) cant. RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES o AOMP SUB - REGIONAL ELEMENTS �W LOCAL GOVERNMENT (cant.) a THIS TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER a ANOTHER HEADING Check for SCAOND permits during fire marshal inspections X T -15 Analyze stationary sources for control as public nuisance X T -13, 16 . Carpool sign -up and explanation of transportation alternatives during new employee orientation X H -34, 112 LAND USE PLANNING Encourage increased residential' sdensities when appropriat@ x x % H -99 Provide industrial /commercial revitalization program X X H -100 a Use Community Development Block Grant funds for major repairs and upgrading residential structures X X H -101 Use multi - purpose centers for' niiii Intensive con ercial uses _i X X X X H -100, 106 Growth management techniques X X H -106 Slow growth /timed development X X H -91 Subdivision regulations X H -106 x i r.. w REClM1E1NED CONTROL MEASURES MW SUN- REGIDNAL ELEMENTS cW9w OW i wyi WSW IYJi �i VW Vjw a O o' "i �W o �Z iW (TABLE X -1) cant. LAW USE PLANNING (cent.) X H -106 Hezara zanina gNSter zwi'. X X X H -106 Annexation X H -106 Coordination with transportation pla o'n9 X 9-91, 93 Perfamance zoning A X H -106 Locate new employment centers close to Probable maptoyee residential areas X X 14-13, 100,10 Neighborhood coamtroial in � esidential areas a - -. X X X H -76, IDO Design residential areas to_facilttate -opus service; X X H -109 Planning review process for air quality consideration X % H -95 Encourage urban infill X X X H -91 Incorporate WT reduction in general plans X X H -93 x V REC01e1ENDED CONTROL MEASURES AVMP SUO- REGIONAL ELEMENTS °u wL oc wi aW VS to G- z ER o SuF (TABLE x -1) coat. LAND USE PLANNING (coot.) a THIS TACTIC ALSO LISTED UNDER MOTHER HEADING energy conservation" ,Require �cunditional pellts R t .N.11- ' Control amount /distribution of growth and development x X X H -93 Locate sensitive receptors in areas of best air quality t [ H -92 Revise ordinances /regulations to provide incentives to non - polluting industries F H -95 Revise ordinances /regulations to provide transportation efficient land use patterns % % R H- 13,93.100 Inclusion of air quality considerations in general plans % x T -11 a Relocation landfill to reduce VMT N H- 111.115 e List landscaping plants selected on the basis of resistance to pollution and capable of removing pollution x X H -110 Revise ordinances /regulations to provide affordable housing in new developments and redevelopments X H -94 x n RECDMIENOED CONTROL MEASURES AW SUB- REGIONAL ELEMENTS aw o ww us o oy ' z 's .Yw — (TABLE x -1) cunt. LAND USE PLANNING (cant.) x H -106 Grath Incentives for Centers Reduced Parking RequlrementS in NSd, 106 Centers x Open Space Plan % 1� SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Ranch Redevelopment Project and hereby finds that the final environmental impact report has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Agency's local CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 2. Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Measures. To the extent that the Redevelopment Plan allows the occurrence of significant effects identified in the final SIR without full mitigation the Agency has identified specific economic, ecological, and social reasons to support its action which make infeasible the project alternatives described in the final EIR or additional mitigation measures. The Agency finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in the Final FIR, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Report to the City Council. Mitigation measures have been made a condition of approval of the Redevelopment Plan and are intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects identified in the Final FIR. The Redevelopment Plan itself is a mitigation measure which is intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects of blighting conditions identified in the Redevelopment Plan, Report to the City Council, and Assessment of Codnitions Report incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this REsolution PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: Palombe Q.nA 'FIUQ-- Lauren M. Wasserman Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Resolution No. 7871 of the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Electing to Receive Allocation of Taxes Pursuant to Provisions of the Community Redevelop- ment Law Dear Lauren: We have reviewed the enclosed Resolution No. 7871 adopted by the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District on October 13, 1981. We would recommend that receipt of Resolution No. 7871 simply be noted in the minutes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that it be filed for future reference, No additional legal action is necessary at this time with respect to Resolution No. 7871. You should know that the legal effect of Resolution No. 7871 is to entitle the Metropolitan Water District to anv "tax increment” directly attributable to future increases in the Metropolitan Water District's tax rate which occur after the effective date of the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. For example, if LAW CFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEGER _ L C i TAIL 4200 ORANGE STREET _ Pa L.w C "GS C+ IFJeN � 82263 1. �31+i 325 3E e+ „•3 P. 0�9CM 1029 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 orrice SUN CITY p is LVON 38620 C +Rc - SuN C 23ei LEE Z December 7, 1981 . e...J,J W IT A 11Z. .11 L LE3.C.LI'JPNIe'sJJ, Lauren M. Wasserman Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Resolution No. 7871 of the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Electing to Receive Allocation of Taxes Pursuant to Provisions of the Community Redevelop- ment Law Dear Lauren: We have reviewed the enclosed Resolution No. 7871 adopted by the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District on October 13, 1981. We would recommend that receipt of Resolution No. 7871 simply be noted in the minutes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that it be filed for future reference, No additional legal action is necessary at this time with respect to Resolution No. 7871. You should know that the legal effect of Resolution No. 7871 is to entitle the Metropolitan Water District to anv "tax increment” directly attributable to future increases in the Metropolitan Water District's tax rate which occur after the effective date of the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. For example, if LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST S, KRIEGER Lauren M. Wasserman December 7, 1981 Page Two the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District were at some future date to enact a special tax in the amount of $.10 per $100 assessed evaluation, the additional tax increment generated by that special tax levy will go to Metropolitan Water District rather than the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since the '_e: *,• of such special tax appears to be highly unlikely, Resolution No. 7871 would appear to have little or no effect on the redevelopment activities presently contemplated by the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. Please let me know if you have any additional questions regarding Resolution No. 7871. Yours nce ely, John E. Brown of BEST, BEST & KRIEGER JEB:bjs Enclosures cc: Municipal Services, Inc. RESOLUTION 7871 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ELECTING TO RECEIVE ALLOCATION OF TAXES PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW WHEREAS, Section 33676 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Sections 33,000 et seq., of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California) provides that any affected taxing agency, such as the District, may elect to be allocated, in a :!dition to that portion of taxes allocated to the District pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 33670 of said Law, all or any portion of the tax revenues allocated to a redevelop- ment agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of said Section 33670 attributable to increases in the District's tax rate which occur after a redevelopment plan becomes effective_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California that this District hereby elects to be allocated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated to this District pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 33670 of the Community / Redevelopment Law (Sections 33,000 et seq., of the Health and safety Code of the State of California), all of the tax revenues allocated to the Rancho Redevelopment Project of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to subdivision (b) of said Section 33670 attributable to any increases in this District's tax rates which occur after the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelopment plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project of the City of Rancho Cucamonga becomes effective. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Secretary is hereby directed to file forthwith certified copies of this resolution with the governing body of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Auditor- Controller, and the Tax Collector for the County of San Bernardino. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, at its meeting held October 13, 1981. Executive SecretRny The Metropolitan Water District / of Southern California CCT 231991 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Ukeof gamd ci Ooeunr �� October 13, 1981 a -3 Mr. Lauren iQassermar. Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91.730 Dear Mr. Wasserman. Enclosed is a certified copy of Resolution 7871, electing to receive allocation of taxes pursuant to provisions / of the Community Redevelopment Law. This resolution was \ adopted by the Board of Directors of Metropolitan Water District at its meeting of October 13, 1981. Very truly yours, Karen E. Dorff Executive Secretary ob Enclosure CITY vF PiiU CYUC' :� Afd ".INIS7Rn 710110, AM OCT 1619dr �t�Igt1011llul1i2i311r� G 4 11115.mel imvrd, to,Angles, CA,. /6ladmgaddres% goc$4133, Los Angeles, Qhl. 90(154 /Telephone: ❑131 6 2 6 4 282 �eu, seal CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ck—Ca o MEMORANDUM , �i 1a 197 I DATE: December 17, 1981 TO: City Council & Redevelopment Agency FROM: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CORRECTION TO PROJECT BOUNDARY Part of the project boundary of the Redevelopment area divides parcels 207 - 102 -15 and 03, which are under, one ownership. The Redevelopment District boundary includes Assessor's Parcel Number 207 - 102 -15; however, a small access route 10' by 500' (Parcel Number 207- 102 -03) is under the same ownership and should have been included within the boundary area. Unless the Council has on objection to making this change in the project boundary description, we will correct the project area boundary map to add this very small parcel in order to assure that the project boundary is coterminus with property ownership. Attached please find a copy of the project area boundary lines. TJB:jr Attachment 15011 ,15012 Opt 10 c @208 09 14 2 2 75AC" P or Lot 2. AA 5" 1545 Ac @ look pq A joint meeting of the Redevelopment Agency and City Council was held on December 16, 1982. The Agency meeting was called to order by Chairman Phillip D. Schlosser. Present were: Agency members ,lames C. Frost, Jon D, Mikels, Michael A. Palumbo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Chairman Phillip D, Schlosser. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Legal Counsel, John Brown; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; and Finance Director, Harry Empey. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Mr. Wasserman provided an overview of the project area, outlined how a redevelop- ment agency financing actually works, and a summary of types of projects which could be financed through a redevelopment agency in order to solve some of the problems which have been identified in our community. Mr. Wasserman stated that since the last public hearing on December 6, staff had met with representatives from the North Town area, with a number of pro- perty owners who had property within the proposed redevelopment area, and also with other taxing agencies. Mr. Wasserman stated that the city had received communication from the Lewis Development Company, dated December 14 indicating support of the redevelopment project. Council and Agency also received some revisions to the draft redevelop- ment plan from the consultant and legal counsel. Manny DeDios went over some of the financing mechanisms, Chairman Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Rudy Guzman asked that since the city council serves as the redevelop- ment agency board, what happens when there is a vacancy on the council? Would that member still be on the agency board or would the new council - member be on the agency? Mr. Wasserman answered that if there was a change in the council, then the new councilmember would become the new agency member. Mr. Guzman stated that at the last hearing there was a reference made that a homeowner would be eligible to borrow low interest loans. How .Long would it be before a property owner would he able to obtain this type of loan? Mr. Brown answered that this was one of the policy decisions which the redevelopment agency would be prioritizing in the months to come. Councilman Bridge asked what percentage of funds would be available within the next three to five years. Mr. DeDios stated that legally we were not entitled to receive actual flow of increments until fiscal year 1982 -83, Tax increment projections have been made and in the next three to four years we could expect about 25% of the ultimate increment which might come to the Agency. There being no further public discussion, Chairman Schlosser closed the public hearing. Mr. Mikels expressed concern with the suggested revisions for the redevelopment plan; in particular, on page 76 of the Agenda Packet. He stated that he had never seen low income defined as income not exceeding 507 of the median income. Mr. DeDios stated that the 507 refers to the very low incomes. Mr. Brown stated that this figure was contained in the California Health and Safety Code in the 50000 section. Mr. Mikels stated that since we deleted a reference to potential involvement with the Foothill Freeway improvement, we should also delete item 11 on page 15 of the Plan, modifications to I -10 access at Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Frost asked Mr. DeDios to review the changes in the December 10 and December 16 memos. Mr. Abe DeDios stated that all the revisions made in the December 10 memo were incorporated into the December 16 with one minor change. That change was on page 3, section 313: the second sentence was added, "The Housing Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan indicates the need for providing low income housing within the City." Mr. Mikels pointed out that the language which he had referred to before, "the Agency may as it deems necessary," appeared again in Section 254 of the memos. Mr. Brown stated that this language arrived out of discussion with staff where it was pointed out that the original language, the shall language, would mean that all subdivision maps would have to come before the redevelop- ment agency before being processed by the city. Mr. Mikels stated that his intent was to limit this to projects which used tax increments, not for the redevelopment agency to look at every single development that went on within the project area. However, there would be projects which would not be using redevelopment financing which would be influencing projects which do. He said that maybe they should set guide- lines as to which projects they would want to review. Mr. Wasserman suggested that this be adopted as originally submitted with instructions to come back with some specific policy guidelines. Mr. Lam stated that regulations for development within the redevelopment area does not change since they must follow all the policies of the city. He felt there were safeguards since the agency would deal with the financial mechanisms and stipulations which only the agency would wish to involve itself. When the agency approved a project, they will be looking at the consequences of any special conditions which have been placed on it to the surrounding area. The agency will see those things they want special conditions on. Anything else will always follow standard city regulations. Mr. Lam suggested using the "may" language and add the sentence, "However, all projects that utilize tax increment financing or otherwise enter into a contractural arrangement in the redevelopment area shall be reviewed and approved by the Agency." Discussion continued regarding the "may" versus the "shall" language. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to keep the permissible "may" language. Mr. Mikels stated that he felt this Body should set the policy guidelines to determine projects to be reviewed. Council felt a motion was not necessary and concurred with Mr. Frost's sugges- tion to maintain the "may" language. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -12. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -12 A RESOLL71ON OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODERATE - INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. Chairman Schlosser opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -12, and to waive further reading of the resolution. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palumbo. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -13. RESOLUTION N0. RA81 -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Mr. Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed. Mr. Brown stated that he had some recommended changes to this resolution which were: SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project and hereby finds that the final environmental impact report has been completed in accordance with CDCA, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Agency's local CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 2. Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Measures. To the extent that the Redevelopment Plan allows the occurrence of signi- ficant effects identified in the final EIR without full mitigation, the Agency has identified specific economic, ecological, and social reasons to support its action which make infeasible the project alternatives described in the final F,IR or additional mitigation measures. The Agency finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in the Final EIR, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Report to the City Council. Mitigation measures have been made a condition of significant environmental effects identified in the final EIR. The Redevelopment Plan itself is a mitiga- tion measure which is intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects of blighting conditions identified in the Redevelop- ment Plan, Report " � City Council, and Assessment of Conditions Report incorporated herein by «.erence. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -13 with the recommended changes and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Secretary, Lauren Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -14. RESOLUTIDN NO. RA81 -14 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTING OF SAID REDEVELOPN.iNT PLAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Chairman Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -14, and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Mikels. ABSENT: Palombo. Mr. Mikels stated he voted no because he wanted to withhold his support of the document until he saw the guidelines. A I OF � i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE DE- CLARING THAT THE PROVISION OF LOW -AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IS OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81 -196 and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -197. He stated this was the same as the Agency's Resolution No. RA81 -13, and will have the same changes. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81 -197 as amended and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None, ABSENT: Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 166. ORDINANCE NO. 166 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 166. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing on the Ordinance. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set the second reading for December 23, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Center. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Assistant Secretary Vax x yr nnav a,nv �, V VnlvxVxv vn GUS- wMO,l, MEMORANDUM z Oil 1977 DATE: Decmeber 16, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council /Redevelopment Agency FROM: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MEETINGS HELD ON THE REDEV LOPMENT AGENCY The City staff met with representatives of the North Town Community this past week to discuss the Redevelopment Agency. The questions we heard generally were similar to those at the December 2 meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency. Staff provided the assurances that this City and the Redevelopment Plan does not in- tend to remove or relocate persons in residential housing. We also indicated that the use of involuntary imminent domain is not a part of the Plan. Community residents indicated that they are interested in the Redevelopment project and wish to see their area improved; however, they want to make sure that the Council /Agency knows that they do not want to be forced to leave their homes. To help further explain the purposes of the Redevelopment Agency, staff completed a question and answer brochure and a Spanish translation. This has been made available to the public and will be at the December 16 public hearing. TJB:jr �i WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as the "Agency ", has formulated and prepared the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Plan'-; and ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga submitted its report and recommendation finding the said proposed Redevelopment Plan to be in conformity with the General Plan and recommending approval of said proposed Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency has adopted rules governing participation and rules for reasonable reentry preferences to property owners, operators of businesses and tenants in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency has adopted a Relocation Method which is to be extended to all persons who may be caused to be displaced resulting from Agency acquisition of certa:,. property; and WHEREAS, the Agency submitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as the "City Council ", said proposed Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency has submitted the Report to City Council accompanying the Redevelopment Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, that Report describes conditions of blight existing within the Project Area; and WHEREAS, after due notice, a Joint Public. Hearing has been held by the Agency and the City Council; and WHEREAS, all actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public agencies; and NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The purposes and intent of the City Council with respect to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area hereinafter referred to as the "Project Area" are: (a) To eliminate and prevent the spread of physical blight and deterioration by promoting and encouraging the revitalization or redevelopment of currently deteriorating or underutilized areas within the Project Area. (b) To encourage new development within the Project Area to provide additional residential housing at affordable prices, and affordable financing terms. (c) To encourage development of office, industrial, commercial and permanent uses within the Project Area to reinforce, strengthen and complement other developments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) To provide for construction which in turn will provide short -term and long -term employment opportunities for local residents. (e) To mitigate the major flood hazards by providing improvements to the existing flood control channels. SECTION 2. The Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project is hereby approved and adopted and designated as the official Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area, and is incorporated herein by reference. L 1 uoprn` SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: (a) The Project Area is a blighted area for the reasons described in thehReport to 0/ml tho.ASSessrhem'XoFcvv%d;t%&� V -e1 the City Council accompanying the Redevelopment Plan,^the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.; (b) The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. in the interests of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare; (c) The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible; (d) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; -2- purposes and policies of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.; (t) The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired as required by law; (g) The Agency has a feasible method for the relocation of families and persons who are temporarily or permanently displaced from facilities in the Project Area; (h) There are or are being provided in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. (i) Inclusion of any land, buildings, or improvements which are not detrimental to Gn the public health, safety, or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the area of which they are a part; that any such area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purposes of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area pursuant to Health and Safety Code, Section 33670, without other substantial justification for its inclusion. (j) The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area cannot be reasonably expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. SECTION 4, The City Council is satisfied permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to such displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the time of their displacement. No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary, and otherwise standard dwellings. The Agency shall not displace such person or family until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. -3- I , to - A. , by ..ay of loans, grants, or other financial assistance. The City Council hereby provides that such financial assistance to the Agency shall be made from time to time as the City Council shall determine to be necessary, and that all such financial assistance shall be deemed to be loans to the Agency based on terms to be established by an agreement between the City and Agency, unless the City Council shall provide in specific cases that such assistance shall be treated other than as a loan. SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved and adopted, it is found and determined that certain official actions must be taken by the City Council with reference, among other things, to changes in zoning, the location and relocation of sewer and water mains and other public facilities and other public action, and accordingly, the City Council hereby: (a) Declares its intention to undertake and complete any proce it deew,s eding Anecessary to be carried out by the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan; and (b) Requests the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga having administrative responsibilities for the City likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 7. The City Council finds that pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the California Health and Safety Code, the use of tax revenues F890ired by the Redevelopment Agency outside of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area for purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate- income housing for persons and families of low or moderate income will benefit the Rancho Redevelopment Ptoject. SECTION 8. The City Council is convinced that the effect of tax increment financing will not cause a severe financial burden or detriment on any taxing agency deriving revenues from the Project Area. SECTION 9. All written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan hereby are overruled. SECTION 10. The City Clerk hereby is directed to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Agency, and the Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. -4- that the proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. The Agency hereby is directed to effectuate recordation in compliance with the provisions of Section 27295 of the Government Code to the extent applicable. SECTION 12. The Community Development Department through the Building and Safety Division is hereby directed after the effective date of this ordinance to advise all applicants for building permits within the Project Area that the site for which a building permit is sought for the construction of buildings or for other improvements is within a Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 13. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded pursuant to Section 33373 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, a copy of this Ordinance and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Rancho Redevelopment Project to the Auditor and Tax Assessor of the County of San Bernardino; to the officer or officers performing the functions of auditor or assessor for any taxing agencies which, in levying or collecting its taxes, do not use the County Assessment Roll or do not collect its taxes through the County; to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which levies taxes upon any property in the Rancho Redevelopment Project and to the State Board of Equalization. Such documents shall be transmitted as promptly as practicable following the adoption of this Ordinance, but in any event, such documents shall be transmitted within 30 days following the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published once in the newspaper of general circulation. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16Ttiday of December, 1981. .;� ,r:. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney The City of Rancho Cucamonga 6fl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1981 TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager i,)� RE: Alta Loma School District /Request for Crossing Guard 19th & Cartilla - Deer Canyon School The City has received a request for an additional crossing guard at 19th and Cartilla Streets beginning January 4, 1982. The Engineering Department states that based on a projected student population the "warrants" are met to justify a crossing guard at this location. In addition, the school district has agreed to fund 4 the cost for the crossing guard at this location. 1977 RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the City Council authorize the addition of one crossing guard for the Deer Canyon School at 19th and Cartilla and authorize the appropriation of 'i of the necessary funds from the City's reserve contingency fund. Currently crossing guards are compensated at an hourly rate of $4.14 per hour. The approximate cost for the City's share of the additional crossing guard's salary is $2,000 for an entire school year. JHR /vz Enclosure Established 1695 BOARD OF TRUSTEES ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W. TANGEMAN MRS, LIZ GALLARINI MRS, SANDRA A. OERLY JOHN C. BOOK Alta Loma School District 93S0•F Baseline Road • Post Office Box 370 a Alta Loma. California 91701 • 714/987.0766 December 15, 1961 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman Subject: Request for Crossing Guard 19th and Cartilla Streets Dear Sir: JOHN E. McMURTRY SuPeanwe m FLOYD M. STORK PesonatUSuPpon Send", SFACY NELSON ausinese Services MILLY STRAIN curriml.wSpedal Pi" The Alta Loma School District requests the placement of a crossing guard at 19th and Cartilla Streets, beginning January 4, 1982. The City's Engineering Department has determined that the crossing meets all the City's criteria for a crossing guard. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. very truly yours, ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT Floyd M. Stork Administrator Personnel and Support Services FMS /jh MEMORANDUMS 5 2 1977 DATE: December 15, 1981 TO: City Council & Redevelopment Agency FROM: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ADDITION TO PROJECT BOUNDARY Part of the project boundary of the Redevelopment area divides parcels 207 - 120 -15 and 03, which are under one ownership. The Redevelopment District boundary includes Assessor's Parcel Number 207 - 102 -15; however, a small access route 10' by 500' (Parcel Number 207- 102 -03) is under the same ownership and should be considered within the boundary area. Unless the Council has an objection to making this change in the project boundary description, we will add this very small parcel in order to assure that the project boundary is coterminus with property ownership. Attached please find a copy of the project area boundary lines. TJB:jr Attachment 00, 15011 ,15012 opt '40 .5 05AA 208 Ads D! 4N ODNO 13 Por Lot ZOTAC 15 45AC 17 2 82 AC 3BOAC. 'I 60 ULEVAR fV- W-IL<3- t6ouwpw4zq Via. SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Ranch Redevelooment Project and hereby finds that the final environmental impact report has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Agency's local CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 2. Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Measures. To the extent that the Redevelopment Plan allows the occurrence of significant effects identified in the final EIR without full mitigation the Agency has identified specific economic, ecological, and social reasons to support its action which make infeasible the project alternatives described in the final EIR or additional mitigation measures. The Agency finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in the Final EIR, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Report to the City Council. Mitigation measures have been made a condition of approval of the Redevelopment Plan and are intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects identified in the Final EIR. The Redevelopment Plan itself is a mitigation measure which is intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects of blighting conditions identified in the Redevelopment Plan, Report to the City Council, and Assessment of Codnitions Report incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this REsolution PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: Palombo MONGA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have consented to a joint public hearing for consideration of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the adoption of a Redevelopment Project requires an Environmental Assessment; and - WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Public Hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project on November 10, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency must consider the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Redevelopment Project prior to adopting the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. NOW THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: t -_..tw SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Agency of a City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the Environmental Impact port for the proposed Rancho 1�� Redevelopment Projectomck htivs►1 {lsmdc -h o pro £r� viP�M I/^namt d1* hao lomy.V. Cwl v„PCo7�„d his et- GGrnGi SECTION a Secretary shag certify to the adoption of this Resolution. /�1 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1981. C eQ A 1U AYES: S NOES: Sec � : Z £l Q IS jt ABSENT: SI. dIO Cdr CET /� Ph r, hairman ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, Secretary Se¢� a�a�Q -756— S-i -a't`e r•,o� c'F � v�i1��v►9 J�-t eases. -�-� p w. Ql ., Op S, k` S�Qcif'�c c01 eco Col icd C re&wrep,*^s 4=6S 6o,-? POJIZ- C*D ac -'t.d%., WW#--c i, w. s ka. w.'�emvi6le j.c.d "LL e A LA,, 1 R c3" l }�cLAW. a.r..9. civ�'�o. F'w,a 1 E 1 R , Tla �.Qdev�lo�+a�C v�Oaizzijaia d1 avoid sigh���ca CAM tAQL scess w•ew� c f,_C�n�-.d_�t�;..a.,� -- - - - -- - a LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. 1156 Nc4h Mourmin A mue PO Box 670 Upland. CA 91786 714 985.0971 December 14, 1981 Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o Municipal Services, Inc. 1661 Hanover Road, Suite 215 City of Industry, CA 91748 Gentlemen: Lewis Development Co., for itself and its affiliates in the Terra Vista project, formally requests that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency assist the Terra Vista area of the Rancho Redevelopment Project in order to induce and accelerate the early development of the property, thereby benefitting the Redevelopment Project and the City at large, and in order to meet the need for affordable housing. The Redevelopment Project is intended to stimulate the economic growth of the area by inducing and accelerating development. New commercial and industrial development will provide property tax, sales tax, and many other sources of revenue. New residential development is essential to house the industrial emplryees and to trigger commercial development, and also provides revenue in and of itself. Affordable housing in particular is essential and is by law a major goal of the Redevelopment Project, The Terra Vista Planned Community contributes to all of these goals. It contains substantial commercial and business areas, significant housing opportunities, and the City's most logical locations for providing affordable new housing. We have previously indicated our interest in the Rancho Redevelopment Plan in letters dated July 30, 1981 and August 19, 1981, which the City instructed us to send directly to Municipal Services, Inc. Included in these letters was information on the tax increment that will be created by the Terra Vista project and on the major infrastructure costs associated with its development. Updated and additional material is enclosed herewith. An incremental tax analysis for the Terra Vista project is enclosed (Exhibit I, including detailed Schedules A through F). It analyzes the property tax, property transfer tax, and sales tax that Terra Vista will generate over the next 20 years. The analysis (Schedule B) indicates that, if developed over a 20 -year period, the Terra Vista project will generate $233 million in total tax revenue. It is estimated that $145 million of the total tax revenue would accrue to the City and the Redevelopment Agency (Schedule F). Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1981 Page 2 There is no assurance that the entire project can be built and financed without redevelopment assistance. The 20 -year build -out period for Terra Vista referred to above is what could occur if no assistance is provided to the project. The basic infrastructure costs of the project are of such magnitude that they will slow down development if only financed entirely out of retained earnings and private financing, that Ss, without financing help from the Agency. Development would have to be deferred until the property value rose to a level adequate to cover major costs, and major improvements would necessarily have to be installed in a piecemeal fashion as each adjoining parcel was developed. However, with assistance from the Agency, Terra Vista can be developed much more rapidly. This is in fact the intent of any redevelopment effort: to assist with high initial costs so that development can occur earlier, with the cost of the assistance greatly more than repaid by the tax revenue generated by the development. With the Agency's assistance making possible earlier development of the project, the total tax revenue generated by Terra Vista would increase to $325 million (Schedule A in Exhibit I). This is $92 million more in tax revenue than would result under the slower development program that would occur without any assistance. The additional revenue results from having developed properties on the tax rolls at an earlier date. This $92 million in tax revenue is created simply by accelerating development and is irretrievably lost if development proceeds at a slower pace. Under the accelerated development schedule, the tax revenue share going to the Redevelopment Agency and the City is estimated at $211 million (Schedule F). This is $66 million more revenue than the Agency and the City would receive under the longer build -out that would occur without any assistance. This $66 million in additional revenue to the City and the Agency is, again, entirely the result of accelerating development and can never be recaptured if development is not accelerated. To put the shove numbers into perspective, if there were no Redevelopment Project or if Terra Vista were not included in it. the Redevelopment Agency would receive no tax revenue from the project and the City would receive only $50 million (Schedule f). To summarize: Revenue share Total revenue to Agency /City Slow build -out, $233 million $ 50 million $95 million gain net in RDA to RDA/City by in in RDA Slow build -out, $233 million $145 million $66 million gain no assistance to RDA /City by assisting project Accelerated build -out $325 millon $211 million with assistance Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1981 Page 3 Providing assistance to accelerate development is a completely proper and fitting use of Redevelopment funds, and the above figures demonstrate the great benefits such assistance can reap for the Redevelopment effort and for the City at large. Rather than "giving money away" by providing assistance, the Redevelopment Agency and City actually show a substantial gain of $66 million, due solely to accelerating the development of Terra Vista. This is in addition to the $95 million that the Redevelopment Agency and the City gain simply by including Terra Vista in the Redevelopment Project. Such assistance provided to accelerate development would be repaid many times over by the resulting revenue. Clearly, the Terra Vista project represents a major portion of the entire Redevelopment Project, and the tax increment created by Terra Vista will be a major source of funding for the many improvements that the Redevelopment Agency hopes to undertake. The Redevelopment Plan identifies several categories of improvements that are proper uses of Redevelopment funds. For instance, anticipated projects include "installation, construction and /or reconstruction of major thoroughfares, freeway interchanges, storm drains, railroad - thoroughfare grade separations, and bridges" (page 3, FIR). Because of Terra Vista's central location, it includes critical links in the City's overall circulation and infrastructure systems. Improvement of these facilities in a timely manner is essential to the orderly development of the City, independent of the development of Terra Vista. Our company is not in a position to complete all of these necessary improvements at an early date, and until they are completed they will constrain the growth of the City at large. The Terra Vista project involves major expenditures for highways, storm drainage, utilities, and similar infrastructure facilities. Some of these major improvements serve the entire City and are not warranted by or necessary to the development of Terra Vista itself. Such improvements benefit the entire Redevelopment Project and should properly be funded by the Agency. Other 'morovements more closely related to Terra Vista itself also benefit the entire Redevelopment effort by accelerating development of a major portion of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is discussed in more detail. in Exhibit 4. The enclosed Exhibit 2 identifies some of the major master planned infrastructure costs of the entire Terra Vista project. Exhibit 3 breaks these costs out by development phase according to a preliminary phasing schedule. The total major infrastructure costs are estimated at approximately $23 million. This is a small percentage (11% to 16 %) of the tax revenue the Agency and the City will receive from the Terra Vista project, and an even smaller percentage (7% to 10 %) of the total tax increment the project will generate. There will be other development costs associated with the project, aside from master planned infrastructure, which would also be appropriate uses of Redevelopment funds. For example, at the last meeting of the Agency, a councilman explained that parking lots could be constructed to promote commercial developments. The Agency can assist with structure and site improvements, offsite costs, land costs, financing, and special assistance for affordable housing. We are asking the Agency to participate in funding the Terra Vista project in all of the above ways. It is clear that such assistance provided to Terra Vista will much more than repay its cost. Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1981 Page 4 By a relatively small initial investment in the Terra Vista project, the Agency can not only facilitate development - which is its purpose - but can also capture tremendous revenues which would not otherwise be created. These funds can be used to provide a variety of improvements vital to the City's growth. And in addition to the tax increment, accelerated development will provide other economic benefits, including stimulation of employment, subventions received on a per capita basis, and the direct labor, material, and sales tax expenditures connected with the construction. Aside from the purely economic benefits to the Agency and the City, assistance in Terra Vista can play a vital role in helping fulfill the need for affordable housing. The Redevelopment Plan makes a major commitment to this goal, and Terra Vista is a logical target area for new affordable housing because of its proximity to planned employment, service, and transportation facilities. However, providing affordable housing without assistance is today extremely difficult. The high basic infrastructure costs referred to above will compound the problem even more. With the Agency's help, though, Terra Vista could meet a great deal of the overall need. Assistance on basic infrastructure for the project would thus serve a dual purpose. Combined with financing aid, a tremendous contribution to the need for affordable housing can be made. For the above reasons, we believe that Agency participation in assisting the development of Terra Vista is a highly proper and beneficial use of Redevelopment funds and is entirely consistent with the overall purposes of the Redevelopment Agency, We hereby request that the Redevelopment Agency enter into an owner - development agreement to fund the costs Cited herein. Provided an appropriate owner- development agreement can be negotiated, it is our intention to participate in the Redevelopment Project to everyone's benefit. Very truly yours, LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. �� /^ - By: Ralph M. Lewis R.ML:gk:2120a Enclosures: - Exhibit 1 - Incremental Tax Analysis Exhibit 2 - Estimated Costs of Major Master Planned Infrastructure Exhibit 3 - Major Infrastructure Costs by Phase (Preliminary) Exhibit 4 - Discussion of Infrastructure Needs cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga EXHIBIT 1 TERRA VISTA INCREMENTAL TAX ANALYSIS The attached schedules illustrate the incremental tax to be generated from the development of the Terra Vista project. For purposes of this analysis the incremental tax includes (a) 1002 of the real property tax generated from the developed property, (b) 1007 of the real property transfer tax generated from resales of developed property, and (c) 1/6 of the sales tax generated from commercial businesses within the Terra Vista project. The analysis, substantiated by the attached schedules, was conducted on two bases, as follows; 10-Year Build -Out. Redevelopment Agency Financed Infrastructure. Using funds made available by the Redevelopment Agency for the early financing of the major project infrastructure, it is assumed the Terra Vista project will be built out in 10 years. The incremental property, transfer, and sales tax revenue generated over the next 20 years amounts to $63.9 million for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and $146.8 million for the Rancho Redevelopment Agency, based no a 10 -year build -out, The combined revenue to both bodies is estimated at $210.7 million. 20-Year Build-Out. No Agency Assistance on the Infrastrucure. If Terra vista is not assisted by the Redevelopment Agency and the infrastructure must be financed from company retained earnings and private borrowing, it is estimated that it may take 20 years or more to build out. Since the longer build -out period results in developed, high tax base properties entering the tax rolls at a later date, the incremental tax generated over the next 20 years amounts to $50.4 million to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and zero to the Redevelopment Agency. The combined City and Redevelopment Agency extra benefit resulting from the accelerated 10 -year build -out, made possible by Agency financing of the infrastructure, is $160.3 million, over and above their revenue under the 20 -year build -out, Schedules A and B. which are recapped in the Summary Schedule on the following page, summarize the incremental revenue based on the two assumptions and illustrate that the 10 -year build -out will. generate $325 million in incremental tax, $92 million more than the $232 million generated from the 20 -year build -out. This tax revenue increase, which results from having a greater amount of developed properties on the tax rolls for a longer period of time, is four times greater than the total cost of the project infrastructure. Schedules C, D, and E contain the detailed calculations for each of the three types of tax revenue. Schedule F estimates the amount of the total tax revenue going to the Redevelopment Agency and to the City. /O yEN.f'�U /LO-O�> � /TE�✓Flb�ifEN> �£Sa'Cy T.w.4.YC'EO �iVS.PH_� >�(/G'TUi96 /966 /Y9/ i /9Y6 ' ___ �A0.4>P1?�TX ANO %�'rifEiP TAX AC//ci✓(/C A"O yEA.P I'dC/tO. O.T ��.,�YCy !�- ffisf9✓Ls- fin/ / /7,EASlAliG7U.P6 ��i�"oPE,Bl>'' iypx A.+�o T.�.cwrj:E' Tx �i�EY✓c� - -- TosAG /iYG�i9fiYE�✓>AL TAX /Jd-!/lNdf -- C�uifcsA7iUE TAx AE!/E�✓v� /.�/CifBivSt �,ycr�i ✓6 �.�r/ - -- A�if/c'J/ �.v.GH�E.O /N�PRSTi9UCTClif6 law � /o // � / /.O/YiWa✓'�67,Bpi�ty,�� /Ect /�r�.w�j� /J. ////LLgA�B /. /N /WaN /9 /.3nlvo✓/ j?! 3.O.r /v/a✓ 10.6ni[[ia✓ 7 /.src� w /YI 13 j��N /(!M'� �'Y. J/NKUb✓ S7YN 4XN� �j sio. /Ni[4p� +SG7riuw✓ `io3.f:ru�a+' it 7 -.-T- Iles', Z27,'13 4 it /wz gl;w672, IV/v/o :tt #4y, 1 714 pi PWO ,�s 4r] Z 4:�� 41 I . oa�� dov� � Siicc_' Arc' iT.vs<:i T .fes�e �:-' any v 4 __ . ?orcve.cFia�o- oo>- ivs.9ac+r✓.fs »,wr<o ewi2r'�+rte� -�.r6 I _ I ILYNIfYr� ni_ (M�Jnx ✓2r,.>r..y'1a> ,7°e+•= , _I .n(wre rFii /.rn,.e -✓ rir rre' 4 �• / � im Paz= .. u _ _ ,. _ i =A.P =__. _..fb.^r:. _Ta 5iv „Tt •:e- „ � �vY �f�C �. /Y2' � /Ll L ^A � /O3Yi "9� � ✓� -Y�, R , >I.3� - - •_'.!d I //69 6J� %P, ,. ' c rr /,dam. Huf1� SP. T. J c._... : _ /966 _ roi �) . /s- "= rf"•Y. � .s /Y -`c .[ 2°YC /C,' �J'✓Et. ,/9:`: 27G /9f% °1PIT:J . rD: '=Y; f_4 •'1> r 3•/� M � �. ?:: E!: .: sGL : ^M, .. . I . � I d /96n' � i 4C'b? ..a .'GYl.Y76 6 �bt ! B7C4�'O' O.l� ✓°a .. S' /C'�s rN I � /ice r d „ Yb wV!, � ✓ ✓:: 1 >1 � .. ^?:6 >T.� �I �� _ -, -- /r9/ -_. 91. "olb __ -. -, '.S9lli.�j_ /�"F"�_i ,[ t76:c`✓c?'� / /O /3i 91 .. I ..6Jo,'D711 1, ..I.. u. - />Y2 /trv3D ,.9wrveA �L7C /, ¢ Sla1r >',,hl3r_ ?i3d , ", 7919) ✓3 ':. .. i..i ,I ii ". /Y. +9 : /at2,ra .:B2v3sin? ', ZHC✓b± �s r1i:w_.•,� »r.°i'_ryi ., :Ycy mow? ;. . -. �..I ,I ...L. v i '� I. /YY-� ,. /vr)be r1>S�o b S*or1Yi ,. Y73n°O :, T7 > -r.a✓q , :JSm1.'F� i ', is /,'Y9 I�1 > ➢ %S7q r2391/b/e; � /Z3 %K>' 1 /FYFif j' �d :'!DBE .7Pd.F1b% I i I �� I i �i�eb .: Z' / %A Id Y°YNN . /J /1/N� At /L`✓v! ?' I S=:Y /b.� t 8T1[YH °9 . n' L "DD/ _ _ __ 2i /J•Kd 196•f • °e'i^ / <Nl•/ 'ar aV01_`r 6RIOM/1 26 we'!" _ I.:: n. y/>•✓GI !A:lf?6 /m'X �6'ln'i43 s ?.3 /✓D/Mr�rn.*oY1Dd �:Y.�d-'rN -" I I I II i I I' I i a I I y I I _ I P I _ I I _I I TV I f ._. *210 to =rcd at Pd. i. 0?7?, -;tc ^-Ceti - II f� ap all o f� 46r ffV/ , ti /mo-m. It IM7 Ut /40 fItm4ro�. ,w fo 7-7 I I i .6o- Mar, yr .6 /3°a ft?M r I. r8 M ... . ....... . I K�All.l s'o, JMV ayw4 .-rlo .7f�v 01 21.901 llr'ov J5 IV nr.. 112elSzP gc-,v) .6o- Mar, yr .6 /3°a ft?M r I. r8 M ... . ....... . I K�All.l ayw4 .-rlo .7f�v 01 21.901 ... . ....... . ayw4 .-rlo .7f�v 01 21.901 llr'ov J5 IV nr.. 112elSzP gc-,v) fl, _Z4 ... . ....... . �'JPgr�fNT>' iNX R.ra Te.➢.v Fre TAr - h �:vt o 9 I- _ .� __ - - "_ - � - - !.c'}xwvr f:.o � /en.•xnoifsw>rAWVYT�s+eu�o /.«lr� ✓if ^ —rte^ ?o �swE Erro coi I i18.✓v�.•Y.G`21 fYHW -_ - - - -- - /,ut'F o.✓ � G/F d //O.bi[ 1 <i✓'r.I .u.. .✓ f - f .>D /N� ....Miw:'a . /L� =%tW .� eK •aL s -.< JrEN,P._ - _ _ - -. /L >r /.+.Y.o1, c /i+. .r „ ' u. iY(�[W C1 /oW5 Jdi /yyt 1i5asl / � I r /Yf3 I_ .. ir.> 91Slrr' I sr /Oir� ., .,, w�� B u .3c'Tw' - Y7,Y,✓3i ..1..� "- />, +.• __ -__. : yC' > -v.b, ^J r 1 /Ma /L r�;�n 1 .t2T0 1 /F� b- .rin .3.'ai l l'w' A'7',114 S ,° /P ;' 7a!' >9 " {'s7 >o ZJ2� 6 aaIi5:'lJ1?4d ?TaAv /YJ'> /r „c� ,. /;6,Y>! .3lPl.: 3f:C0 d /Y. ➢1B , " fFG 131],>IP Zp-w-) J 3.IpS /qI 32i ej .3 /.DA IA .P6Y2 ?r ✓.'7 - .Y68 p. _ SGm� f9. ✓D : /xYo ?s+ ;, s',Ppvr I: .7ntia S /:od >P, .1 fL� 'i M,J;d /O .'YSYhJi:54 g O, ee Zr _ / /ff /� .. Nran4 .1 /y�A Y. /CA In ,I •.- /+'r'( .•_. - - _ - Za'SYffi PSp.33r -» - S_•hrA. !PS!`YY' 1 t r; r�Y!• ;I % r. CY'?Y/;- :I E2 Z3% �.'/31'm2 S:'rJ,>{ I!' ➢Fea! !j 7a'f3A I: %iailJ� V%1,71r dC:39F, z F ?Y. dl.; Ef "[I Zn33 <0! r/ It I , /v/ /p[S a f ?a 9.T .: ..'T ✓oA ; lwwi 1� ✓ /.c <'�.ass ii I !Y,'Y °2eZ6Jx?I r: 3.?2Z/ 67 ± ➢j „ .'471w 3� jl /o. » /Pd, �I .I fire ?19i rir /av /F /�; ,. > n 3fr113 7rY:j ?r /�7/' „ m ti % , /dlpl>! y SdArrO 61�FS5'- . .. /}'�'Y /Y>.P :33"Yas' 89>rrO, ;, iTJ „ J'. ^:Y y ?IO ✓iP /xYJm �! ! /,.(s9,yy Z+v7dJ) ,: Flp �i .639% Ij . Tibvrj >36,roo :: :SYYiy, /<,R'% ]Ya, YZJ'✓Sf +: /3 3N d J[B>daNY? Yr� Z2i(51A � ^Tro33 ;, 21, iv8w � 9SS1 lic ➢3o .. 9lraio : 2 •, ,. " " , ;p , , ', 1pir"cJ 1 1 � TtY 9Sppwoo ! 1/c3a1dN ” +a Scb r ✓y / /ory L a J9J I 2tMA y 2> t1Y 9d6A r Iq II .K& „ Cv ! ' lJ'JS' rfY3111- �0 ?li.',� 1Sv13 � I , T r e ° - - ♦ '- 1 ... r I � � I I I 1 .I �),(hFS.!/ry >.ol SUS ��nescLi.idC 1.�2t'Tr >ljN c�i1CNC.r1e�G A7� a tir.0 y.,ct+� j/ LU L�+.c «�vJ' iuN.t.' I "� /wLA[YT�i4<- ..I yI ! fiOri+'q, (?� �i �f'. -e �-- /.,. y%y,� S/ . ll:b OA'� TNF Vii.✓ / un:• �"aJ tx/ P�/X: .YY,a'TX -!1 LJCL<� � .tN4yr (vm)On»4Q. (Cep i➢N J>t� I I ,: �,""�� (JJ ��Ai CeY'aGlY rervi.�pr: c�lNl,�N>Fd 'iS .(iNJPQ LLVI .;w,'tftl' ;iyek "1140watry X (nG °v Nrs Mrn reui.'y; x �'r ?s ro •ti'/ X (Tfd Q-00.0 -W �i./%➢F.f'fl yFAC'e Of.'CS,✓Yy'S ,.:.SS G� f /sV.i !'.�fi �.r'i CF ' - - i.. it ! ' i AA-1 Cl) zz 14 w Ae 60, /.WYpa 1OJ--e "OL" "O IX (✓) Jn5 O-A EXHIBIT 2 TERRA VISTA ESTIMATED COSTS OF MAJOR MASTER PUNNED INFRASTRUCTURE Major roads Traffic control Bridges Storm drainage Sewer system Mater system $11,921,052 1,500,000 233,000 6,223,753 996,875 2,303,456 $23,180,135 The above costs are for major master planned infrastructure only and are based on preliminary estimates. In addition to the above items, funding is requested for appropriate structure, site preparation, land, financing, end other costs associated with the commercial residential and affordable housing areas of the project. EXHIBIT 3 TERRA VISTA M?JOR INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS BY PHASE (PRELIMINARY) Percentage affordable: 25.05% Commercial/ Potential Number Office Cast of major affordable phase of units acres infrastructure units I 1,428 118.0 $ 9,169,597 350 II 1,460 100.7 6,342,106 375 III 1,250 16.3 2,622,272 300 IV 1,212 -0- 1,876,655 250 V 1,299 -0- 3,058,444 350 VI 1,390 -0- 971,328 325 VII 743 -0- 139,733 250 Totals 9,782 235.0 $23,180,135 2,200 Percentage affordable: 25.05% EXHIBIT 4 TERRA. VISTA DISCUSSION OF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS The following is intended to identify some of the major infrastructure needs associated with the Terra Vista project and to very briefly identify why these items are appropriate uses of Redevelopment Agency funds. Milliken Avenue. Milliken Avenue is essential to provide access to the entire eastern half of the city and to link industrial and residenti,.l areas to freeways and other transportation corridors. It is essential tc the orderly development of the City even if Terra Vista were never to develop. Traffic analysis by the Citv's traffic consultants indicates that Milliken will be needed as a full six -lane divided highway, plus additional lanes at intersections, simply to carry Citywide traffic when the City is fully developed - even if Terra Vista does not develop at all. Development of Milliken by Lewis Development Co. will necessarily by done in many segments and would take many years to complete, constraining development in other areas of the City in the meantime. Milliken, is clearly a Citywide need and its funding on a Citywide basis is more than justified. Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, Base Line Road, Rochester Avenue. These major arterials are on the perimeter of the Terra Vista project. Their improvement is needed to accommodate Citywide traffic aside from traffic generated by Terra Vista. This is again borne out by the City's traffic consultant with respect to a substantial portion of the ultimate improvements to each street. Foothill Boulevard in particular is planned for major commercial development. The high cost of improving Foothill (including street improvements, landscaping, master planned storm drains, and necessary utilities) is extremely high and therefore may deter development until property values rise, thereby delaying generation of tax increment and causing irretrievable loss of increment funds. Foothill additionally is a major through route and image giver to the City, as are the other highways mentioned. Secondary arterials and collector roads. Church Street and Cleveland Avenue are called for in the General Plan as secondary arterials. In. combination with Terra Vista Parkway, they open up the Terra Vista property to development. Their improvement, in addition to accelerating development, will also make the prevision of affordable housing in Terra Vista much more feasible. Traffic control and brid es. Major traffic control improvements (signals and pedestrian crossings) will be required. Again, much of these improvements are required to accommodate City background traffic on the major arterials which serve the City at large. The project also requires work on three bridges across Deer Creek, all of which are shown on City master circulation plans. Storm drainage system. Extremely high expenditures will be required to DISCUSSION OF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS Page 2 construct storm drainage facilities to serve the development. In several rases major drains are required, not to accommodate storm flows from the Terra Vista property, but to convey flows from existing properties to the north- Approximately one - fourth of the total estimated storm drain cost for Terra Vista is to construct drains in this category, which serve other areas and are not related to the Terra Vista development itself. Other major drains are required in Foothill Boulevard (see discussion above) and interior to the project, the cost of which may deter development and will militate against the overall affordable housing goals of the project and of the Redevelopment effort. Sewer and water mains. Major backbone utility extensions will be needed to open up the project to development and a great deal of the. total outlay must be expended up front. Assisting with these facilities is consistet.t with the Redevelopment goal to accelerate development. Summary. The above items all represent major basic costs that are not associated with atypical smaller development. They are essential to open up the area for development and by participating in their early construction, the Redevelopment Agency can capture additional tax increment revenue which will repay the cost of the initial improvements many times over. An addi- tional very important goal of the Redevelopment effort is the provision of substantial affordable housing. With assistance on extraordinary costs such as the above, the Terra Vista can make a major contribution to fulfilling that need. The improvements discussed above are basic backbone infrastructure only and do not include any local streets and facilities or onsite costs of specific projects. Other elements of individual development projects will also involve major expenses and would merit assistance on buildings, site improve- ments, offsite facilities, land costs, and /or financing. Commercial develop- ments along Foothill Boulevard in particular would be prime candidates for Redevelopment participation because of their economic benefit. Specific affordable housing projects would also be. logical targets for Redevelopment participation. We ask that the Agency provide funding for these items as well as the specific infrastructure improvements discussed above. Such assistance is completely consistent with Redevelopment legislation and with the goals of removing impediments to development, stimulating economic growth, and meeting the need for affordable housing. MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. MEMORANDUM TO: LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM: ABE DE DIOS DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1981 SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDFVVELOMENT PROJECT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. Based upon input received from the Agency Staff and Counsel, it is recommended that the following revisions to the Draft Redevelopment Plan be incorporated prior to adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Redvelopment Agency at its regularly scheduled meeting on December 16, 1981: Section 102 Revise 2nd paragraph to read: Rancho Cucamonga is experiencing n physical deterrents to growth, due in particular, to the existence of inadequate flood col : public improvements, as well as a lack of public facilities, open spaces, and utilities whit cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. At the present time, the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of a prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social and economic maladjustment due in part to the existence of lots or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water. It is anticipated that this Redevelopment Plan can eliminate the existing conditions causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area to the extent that it will no longer constitute a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the economy. These conditions cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone without redevelopment, (See Assessment of Conditions Report). Section 103 (Definitions) Revise the definitions to read; "Low or Moderate Income" means persons and families whose income does not exceed 120% cif the area median income as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, "Very Low Income" means persons and families whose income do not exceed the qualifying limits for very low income families as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105 and established pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, or in -I- the event such federal standards become obsolete, persons and families whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the median income, as estimated by the Agency from time to time, for the area in which the housing units in question are located. Section 201 Revise paragraph 1 to read: Such acquisition does not include the employment of condemnation nor eminent domain proceedings, pursuant to Sections 33342 and Sections 33391 (b) of the California Health and Safety Code, except as provided for in Sections 211 of this Redevelopment Plan. Section 211 Revise first sentence of paragraph 2 to be footnoted as: 1 Owner participation rules adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Resolution No. RA - 81 -9 adopted on November 4, 1981. Section 232 Revise first paragraph to read: The Agency is authorized by California Health and Safety Code Section 33445 to pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure, or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without the Redevelopment Project Area necessary to carry out this plan. it is contemplated that acquisition of property and the installation and construction of the following buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements may be undertaken as part of this Redevelopment Plan: (insert each facility for which acquisition of property and installation or construction is contemplated by the Redevelopment Plan). The Agency and the City have determined that such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and that no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 232 Add following: 15. Fire Protection Facilities Due to the expected increase in population and development, four proposed fire stations are to be located within the Project Area; one within the Victoria Plan Community, one within the Terra Vista Planned Community and two within the Industrial Specific Plan. -2- Section 254 Revise 2nd paragraph to read: The Agency shall require that development plans (whether public or private) conform to the requirements of this Plan, City's General Plan and zoning ordinance as well as all other local requirements formulated pursuant to this plan. In order to insure that the requirements of this plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval. All development must conform to this plan and all applicable federal, state and local laws as amended from time to time, and must receive the approval of appropriate reviewing public agencies. Section 301 Revise to read: Subject to any limitation in law, the City may aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying Out this Plan and may take any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused the blight in the Project Area. Section 311 Revise 2nd paragraph to read: The proposed land uses as described in the following sections conform to the General Plan and also conform to existing sperifie and Community Plans which have been adopted for certain portions of the Project Area. (See Exhibit 2 for General Plan and Proposed Land Uses.) The Redevelopment Plan's main purpose is to faeiitate the provision of needed public improvements and thereby ercourages development of underutilized areas by providing feasible financing mechanisms. All of the proposed redevelopment activities conform to the General Plan and more specifically, conform to all elements of the General Plan which include: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, seismic safety, noise, community design (includes scenic highways) and safety elements. AR elements in the General Plan contain objectives for achieving established goals, the implementation of which will be enhanced by the Redevelopment Plan. Section 313 Revise this paragraph to read: The land designated for residential uses, as illustrated on Exhibit 2, General Plan Map, are vacant at the present time. The Housing Element of the Rgneho Cucamonga General Plan indicates the need for providing low income irousin within_ the City. While it is anticipated that the development of residential uses of approximately 17,800 units in the Project Area will go forward with a minimum of Agency involvement, it may be necessary for the Agency to become involved in providing off -site public improvements or land acquisition assistance in order for actual development to occur in the area. -3- Section 331 Revise this section to read: All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan except in conformance with the provisions of this Plan. In order to insure that the requirements of this Plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval. Section 334 Revise to read- ". .. No parcels in the Project Area including any parcels retained by a participant shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. In order to insure that the requirements of this Plan are carried out, the Agency may as it deems necessary require that development plans (whether public or private) shall be submitted to it for review and approval." Section 339 Delete Section 401 Add the following after the first sentence: The Agency has determined that it may use these funds inside or outside the Rancho Redevlopment Project Area. 'lhe Agency and the City have found that such use will be of benefit to the Rancho Redevlopment Project and that the provision of low- and moderate - income housing outside the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area will be of benefit to the project. Section 505 Revise last paragraph to read: The Agency may use such tax funds inside the Project Area or, outside the Project Area. The City Council has found that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. In addition, the Project Area includes property suitable for low and moderate income housing. AD /KJ /dr -4-