Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/03/05 - Agenda Packetr 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15t and 3rd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. MARCH 5, Zoos MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Donald J. Kurth, M.D. L. Dennis Michael Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Debra J. Adams, CMC ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~~ RANCHO cUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ MARCH 5, 2008 A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY COUNCIL. III B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) ~~ C. 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire 2. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -Fire CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams Presentation of a check for $43,000 from the Friends of the Library by the President of the Friends of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. 2. Recognition of Community and City Participants in the 2007 Spark of Love Toy Program. 3. Announcement regarding "Healthy Hounds and Humans," in partnership with 24-Hour Fifness, promoting the health benefits of pet ownership. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. (Continued on page 3) 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT ACENCY~ F[RE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. .T. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to comments made by the general public. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $863,748.05. 2. Approval of a contract with G/M Business Interiors and various other contracts to provide and install systems and freestanding furniture, carpeting and related items for various departments throughout City Hall, utilizing a County of San Bernardino contract, to be funded as per the 2007/2008 approved budget for Redevelopment Agency Acct. Nos. 2650801-5602 and 2650801-5207 (Public Improvements 2001 TAB), and authorize staff to transfer funds associated with the project to the appropriate accounts. 3. Approval to accept bids received and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $75,000.00 to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., (RA 08-006 / CO 08-013) of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffiti Abatement Services, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316- 5300 ($48,750) and Acct No. 2620801-5300 ($26,250), as approved in the FY 2007-08 Budget with an option to renew for additional one-year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-08. 3 4 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 ~~ L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~~ The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board atone time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. 4. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $64,228.63. ~~ M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. 5. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, and payroll ending February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $5,451,174.31. 6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, to be funded from Measure "I" funds, Acct. No. 1176303-565011627176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 08-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $12,739.00 awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2007), administered by the State of California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Acct. No. 1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $4,869.00 into Acct. No. 1380501-5207 (O&M/Capital Supplies) and $7,870.00 into Acct. No. 1380501-5603 (Capital Outlay-Equipment). 8. Approval to declare surplus City-owned miscellaneous equipment and vehicles. 9. Approval to award a contract to C.S. Legacy Construction, Inc. (CO OS-016), in the amount of $1,831,717.25 (plus a 10% contingency) from Park Development Account No. 1120305- 5650/1313120-0 for the construction of the South Etiwanda Park aka Garcia Park Improvement Project. 4 6 9 51 53 58 60 77 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 10. Approval to accept bids received and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $75,000.00 to Urban Gral~ti Enterprises, Inc., (CO 08-013 / RA 08-006), of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffiti Abatement Services, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316- 5300 ($48,750) and Acct No. 2620801-5300 ($26,250), as approved in the FY 2007-08 Budget with an option to renew for additional one-year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-08. 11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14759 (Traffic Signals), located at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and the other at Banyan Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Pulte Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 08-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14759 (TRAFFIC SIGNALS) 12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6`h Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken. 13. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00097 located at 12645 6`h Street, submitted by Inland Empire Utilities Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 08-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00097 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 14. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16089, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by David F. Dowding & Judy Dowding, husband and wife, Daniel Valdivia & Karla Valdivia, husband and wife, and Fabricio Badiola, a married man. RESOLUTION NO. 08-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16089 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 5 80 82 85 86 88 90 91 93 15. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 94 Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759 (street improvements), located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. 08-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759 (STREET IMPROVEMENTS} AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-1, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-2, located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14759-2 (Rancho Summit Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. 19. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14759-3 (Olive Grove Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. 20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-3, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-053 96 97 99 100 102 103 105 107 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 7 21. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson project, 110 Contract No. 07-218 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and authorize the Acting City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $112,944.00. 112 RESOLUTION NO. 08-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN TO WILSON PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-218, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK N. JOINT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub area 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the City Council for final action. 114 114 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 8 282 RESOLUTION NO. 08-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006- 00635, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. ORDINANCE NO. 790 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14 2. RESOLUTION NO. 08-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"}, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO 312 340 344 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING, L.P. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA -- RESOLUTION NO. RA 08-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"), IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO 3. RESOLUTION NO. 08-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 2. PRESENTATION REGARDING ON-LINE PAYMENT AND PROCESSING OF PERMIT FEES (oral/PowerPoint presentation) 3. PRESENTATION OF THE RECENT NEIGHBORHOOD CLEAN-UP EVENT (orallPower- Point presentation) 9 346 348 350 353 4. INTRODUCTION OF CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF AND AN OVERVIEW OF CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES (oral/PowerPoint presentation) HERMOSA AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE ACCT. NO. 2622801-5620 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 5, 2008 P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (oral report) ~~ O. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 28, 2008, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Asenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263414 2/13/2008 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 1,706.76 AP - 00263414 2/13/2008 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 17,642.24 AP - 00263448 2/13/2008 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,629.91 AP - 00263463 2/13/2008 DIRECTORY & MAPS USA INC. 5,400.00 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 59.64 AP - 00263491 2/13/2008 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 47,377.36 AP - 00263498 2/13/2008 JONES LUMBER COMPANY INC 7,832.56 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 383.59 AP - 00263523 2/13/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 5,533.40 AP - 00263523 2/13/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 8,315.61 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 44.41 AP - 00263535 2/13/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 80,111.25 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 703.00 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 100.00 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 9,097.91 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 30.06 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 205.65 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10.59 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 457.17 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 523.93 AP - 00263612 2/13/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 156.21 AP - 00263669 2/20/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,512.25 AP - 00263669 2/20/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00263669 2/20/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00263694 2/20/2008 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 107,134.13 AP - 00263694 2/20/2008 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 52,897.49 AP - 00263751 2/20/2008 HDL COREN AND CONE 4,200.00 AP - 00263770 2/20/2008 KIPLINGER LETTER, THE 89.00 AP - 00263781 2/20/2008 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP 19,467.61 AP - 00263800 2/20/2008 MOTOROLA 21,845.94 AP - 00263827 2/20/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 80,551.81 AP - 00263831 2/20/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 383,143.75 AP - 00263831 2/20/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -38,314.38 AP - 00263835 2/20/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 8,633.33 AP - 00263852 2/20/2008 SAFCO CAPITAL CORP 29,265.87 Total for Check ID AP: 863,748.05 Total for Entity: 863,748.05 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Curren[ Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:55:2 STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~''~~ RANCHOI ~UCAMONGA DATE: March 5. 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS AND VARIOUS OTHER CONTRACTS TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL SYSTEMS AND FREESTANDING FURNITURE, CARPETING AND RELATED ITEMS FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS THROUGHOUT CITY HALL UTILIZING A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONTRACT TO BE FUNDED AS PER THE 2007/2008 APPROVED BUDGET FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNT NUMBER'S 2650801-5602 AND 2650801-5207 (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 2001 TAB) AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO TRANSFER FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS. RECOMMENDATION Approve a contract with G/M Business Interiors and various other contracts to provide and install systems and freestanding furniture, carpeting and related items for various departments throughout City Hall utilizing a County of San Bernardino contract to be funded as per the 2007/2008 approved budget for Redevelopment Agency account number's 2650801-5602 and 2650801-5207 (Public Improvements-2001 TAB) and authorize staff to transfer funds associated with the project to the appropriate accounts. BACKGROUND In budget year 06/07 an assessment of work space within City Hall created the need to evaluate city wide employee work space and public common areas. It was determined that the majority of the furniture for City Hall is original to the construction of the building. The ability to maintain and replace this furniture has become difficult to complete given a dwindling parts inventory and inability to obtain stock that is now discontinued. In the past, staff has successfully addressed the replacement of damaged components and reconfiguration of work areas to accommodate the changing needs of new or current employees. After many years, it has become increasingly more difficult to continue this approach. Knowing this staff looked at possible solutions to address these issues. P2 P3 age 2 March 5, 2008 City Hall Furniture Contract, GIM Interiors Purchasing, working with a space planner, identified areas in need of replacement or basic upgrades. Additional areas, such as conference rooms and storage areas and public common areas were also reviewed. Overall assessment identified areas that could be enhanced to increase employee productivity, provide for common areas for collaborative needs, and meet industry ergonomic requirements. Also assessed were areas that could benefit by adding file storage and paper management components. Additional consideration was also given to purchasing eco-friendly, sustainable furniture, upgrade lighting to energy efficient fixtures, upgrade interior fiber cables and associated products to assist in making the building more environmentally conscience. Staff recommends Council approve the contracts to continue the reconfiguration and needed replacements throughout City Hall. The results of this work will create improved employee work space utilization and overall work place effectiveness, enhanced collaboration, enhanced ergonomics, flexibility for future employee workspace, technology related support areas and the ability to maximize paper flow and filing storage needs. In addition, improvements in to the cabling infrastructure for network connectivity, telecommunication cabling, heating and air conditioning retrofits, lighting, and electrical modifications will also be accomplished. Res~pec~tful~ly s~ubmitted,p""""`~ U Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director STAFF REPORT ~ - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Ernest Ruiz, Maintenance Superintendent Streets, Storm Drains & Fleet Subject: ACCEPT BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 TO URBAN GRAFFITI ENTERPRISES, INC., OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA FOR CITYWIDE GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001316-5300 ($48,750) AND 2620801-5300 ($26,250) AS APPROVED IN THE FY 07-08 BUDGET WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UPON REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF PRICING AND MUTUAL CONSENT, UP TO A TOTAL OF FOUR YEARS BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 07-08 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $75,000 to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffti Abatement Services, to be funded from 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and 2620801-5300 ($26,250) as approved in the FY 07-08 budget with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in fiscal year 07-08. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council and Board action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 (see attached Bid Summary). The funding far this project was approved in the FY 07-08 budget for $75,000. Staff has reviewed all bid documents and found Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc. to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Superior Property Services submitted the lowest bid; however, withdrew their proposal after further review of the. banding requirements. The project specifications required the contractor to demonstrate their color matching capabilities prior to acceptance of their proposal. Staff has met with Urban Graffiti Enterprises and determined they meet all the qualifications specified. This graffiti contractor will augment our existing in-house graffiti abatement crews and will assist in implementing our new comprehensive graffiti removal program targeting private property. P4 ity Manager/Community Development P5 BID SUMMARY CITYWIDE GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES Bidder's Name Total Bid** Superior Pro ert Services, Inc.* $1,010.00 Urban Graffiti Enter rises, Inc. $3,825.00 * Superior Property Services, Inc. apparent low bidder; however, they declined the award due to the bonding requirements of this contract. ** A multiplying factor was used for the comparison of bids. Total maximum contract amount for FY 07-08 is $75,000. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor_N_ ame Amount AP - 00263405 2/13/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,336.50 AP - 00263413 2/13/2008 BAUER COMPRESSORS 188.18 AP - 00263416 2/13/2008 BELL, MIKE 1,580.00 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 264.97 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 265.68 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 156.00 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 266.48 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 195.39 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 2]0.16 AP - 00263431 2/13/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 179.05 AP - 00263435 2/13/2008 CARSON, DANIEL 310.00 AP - 00263441 2/13/2008 CLOW, FRED 198.60 AP - 00263443 2/13/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 668.70 AP - 00263445 2/13/2008 COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY INC 796.00 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 262.62 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 390.12 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.94 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 367.09 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.78 AP - 00263459 2/13/2008 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 53.86 AP - 00263470 2/13/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 332.10 AP - 00263470 2/13/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00 AP - 00263470 2/]3/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 372.21 AP - 00263489 2/13/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 17.42 AP - 00263489 2/13/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 6.96 AP - 00263493 2/13/2008 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 150.00 AP - 00263494 2/13/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 64.64 AP - 00263505 2/13/2008 LANDORF, RICHARD 825.00 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 5.90 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 72.67 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 28.31 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.15 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -21.88 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 66.74 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.18 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,555.24 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 149.94 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 101.48 AP - 00263527 2/]3/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 143.89 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.99 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.78 AP - 00263540 2/13/2008 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 659.70 AP - 00263543 2/13/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 7.00 AP - 00263544 2/13/2008 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 24.50 AP - 00263549 2/13/2008 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LLC 699.74 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,804.50 AP - 00263559 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 350.00 AP - 00263560 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 81.50 AP - 00263561 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00 AP - 00263561 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00 AP - 00263561 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00 AP - 00263561 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00 AP - 00263561 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00 P6 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:56:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT p7 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263568 2/13/2008 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 321.25 AP - 00263568 2/] 3/2008 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 321.25 AP - 00263571 2/13/2008 SMART AND FINAL 34.46 AP - 00263571 2/13/2008 SMART AND FINAL 47.97 AP - 00263571 2/13/2008 SMART AND FINAL 30.49 AP - 00263571 2/13/2008 SMART AND FINAL 27.09 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 596.89 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 204.66 AP - 00263594 2/13/2008 ULTIMATE OFFICE 82.09 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 97.63 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 97.63 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263618 2/13/2008 XEROX CORPORATION 94.43 AP - 00263618 2/13/2008 XEROX CORPORATION 147.00 AP - 00263622 2/20/2008 25 DOLLAR ROOTER & PLUMBING CO. INC. 97.50 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 60.96 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 49.18 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 51.40 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 183.71 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 60.96 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 95.37 AP - 00263632 2/20/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 14.82 AP - 00263636 2/20/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,093.50 AP - 00263636 2/20/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 182.25 AP - 00263680 2/20/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 14.83 AP - 00263681 2/20/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 56.44 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 286.45 AP - 00263717 2/20/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 3,300.59 AP - 00263717 2/20/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 860.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 531.36 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 440.78 AP - 00263727 2/20/2008 FIRECOM 2,495.00 AP - 00263727 2/20/2008 FIRECOM 13.65 AP - 00263746 2/20/2008 HAM RADIO OUTLET 4,744.]0 AP - 00263752 2/20/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 8.10 AP - 00263771 2/20/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 105.93 AP - 00263771 2/20/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 110.19 AP - 00263777 2/20/2008 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 680.16 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 926.64 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 2,921.23 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 209.03 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 3,144.78 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 3,732.62 AP - 00263779 2/20/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC G73.32 AP - 00263783 2/20/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 88275 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 305.79 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 68.42 AP - 00263796 2/20/2008 MIELKE, BRETT 130.00 AP - 00263803 2/20/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.96 AP - 00263826 2/20/2008 PF SERVICES INC 429.51 AP - 00263858 2/20/2008 SC FUELS 1,799.25 AP - 00263858 2/20/2008 SC FUELS 2,686.01 AP - 00263858 2/20/2008 SC FUELS 1,340.51 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:56:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263871 2/20/2008 SMART AND FINAL 53. 23 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,389 .69 AP - 00263883 2/20/2008 STYLISTICS SPECIALTY MATTRESS MFG 2,966 .15 AP - 00263889 2/20/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 42 .00 AP - 00263889 2/20/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65 .00 AP - 00263889 2/20/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 75 .00 AP - 00263889 2/20/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 63 .00 AP - 00263893 2/20/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53 .82 AP - 00263893 2/20/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53. 82 AP - 00263899 2/20/2008 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 5. 78 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 34 .71 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 534 .99 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 20 .10 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, JANET 34 .91 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, JANET 20 .65 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, 7ANET 25 .00 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, JANET 14 .28 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, JANET 17 .78 AP - 00263906 2/20/2008 WALKER, JANET 7 .50 AP - 00263909 2/20/2008 WEST MARK FIRE APPARATUS 409 .26 Total for Check ID AP: 64,228 .63 Total for Entity: 64,228.63 P8 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:56:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263391 2/13/2008 A & R IMPORT DOMESTIC 22.00 AP - 00263392 2/13/2008 A&V SOFTBALL 1,541.00 AP - 00263393 2/13/2008 A.C. ULTIMATE CO. 34.50 AP - 00263394 2/13/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 366.78 AP - 00263395 2/13/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 25.86 AP - 00263395 2/13/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.70 AP - 00263396 2/13/2008 ABIDING WORD FAITH MINISTRIES 100.00 AP - 00263396 2/13/2008 ABIDING WORD FAITH MINISTRIES 30.00 AP - 00263397 2/13/2008 ACCELA INC 185.00 AP - 00263398 2/13/2008 ALKAHEST ARTISTS & ATTRACTIONS 2,000.00 AP - 00263399 2/13/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 205.80 AP - 00263399 2/13/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 144.39 AP - 00263400 2/13/2008 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 16,329.82 AP - 00263401 2/13/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 215.50 AP - 00263402 2/13/2008 AMERICAN PIPE AND GEO-TEXTILES 305.04 AP - 00263403 2/13/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 219.58 AP - 00263404 2/13/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 61.95 AP - 00263404 2/13/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 7.01 AP - 00263406 2/13/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00263407 2/13/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 2,217.60 AP - 00263407 2/13/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,524.60 AP - 00263407 2/13/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,603.60 AP - 00263408 2/13/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 6,631.25 AP - 00263408 2/13/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 9,096.25 AP - 00263409 2/13/2008 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 2,263.94 AP - 00263410 2/13/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 382.59 AP - 00263410 2/13/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 690.89 AP - 00263410 2/13/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 501.69 AP - 00263410 2/13/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 726.09 AP - 00263411 2/13/2008 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 300.00 AP - 00263412 2/13/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 77.58 AP - 00263415 2/13/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 1,710.00 AP - 00263415 2/13/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 3,745.00 AP - 00263417 2/13/2008 BISHOP COMPANY 407.25 AP - 00263418 2/13/2008 BLINDS ETC. 52.80 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 185.49 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 340.49 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 165.99 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.29 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.13 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 106.40 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.13 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.24 P9 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 34.06 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.49 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.75 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.95 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 80.87 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 114.92 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.71 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.44 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 366.08 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 91.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.88 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.28 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 89.70 P10 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pl 1 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 221.37 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/] 3/2008 BRODART BOOKS 87.55 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 977.23 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.50 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/132008 BRODART BOOKS 679.14 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 121.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.54 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.44 AP - 00263429 2/] 3/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS ]08.83 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 187.59 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 119.39 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.21 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 147.13 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 96.06 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.28 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.]8 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 68.31 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.33 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 168.14 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/] 3/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.32 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P12 AQeuda Check Reeister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 127.69 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 134.36 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.37 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.34 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.06 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 IIRODART BOOKS 2,017.56 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.59 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.28 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.75 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.49 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 74.62 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 138.40 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.21 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP -40263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 250.98 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.85 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.58 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 274.66 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 189.43 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 104.30 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.85 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,617.44 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.33 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 289.42 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 344.80 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 810.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 534.98 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 502.27 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 259.62 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 157.47 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 420.60 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.24 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.S 1 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.54 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 102.53 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 78.93 P13 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layou[ Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P14 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.59 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4047 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.57 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 123.80 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 213.61 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 426 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 58.33 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 416.16 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 222.64 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 176.25 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 301.73 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 800.17 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 781.43 AP - 00263429 2/ 13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 67.71 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.07 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.20 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.24 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 185.28 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.34 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 64.06 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 100.10 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.95 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 112.87 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.24 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.75 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.5 ] AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 290.45 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263429 2!13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 224.98 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.64 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.50 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.53 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 53.21 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 795.52 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 526.52 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 419.40 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.82 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.7 ] AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.15 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 169.13 AP - 00263429 2/] 3/2008 BRODART BOOKS 3 ] 5.78 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Curren[ Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.34 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 92.38 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.57 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.26 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 418.85 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 37.28 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 77.74 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 127.91 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 70.65 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.24 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 68.75 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 324.49 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.17 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.33 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.57 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.50 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.48 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.76 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.51 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 212.69 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 59.11 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.95 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.01 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.58 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.17 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.89 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.17 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 54.86 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 69.91 AP - 00263429 2/]3/2008 BRODART BOOKS 173.19 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.32 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.10 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,24428 AP - 00263429 2/13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.48 AP - 00263429 2!13/2008 BRODART BOOKS 460.15 AP - 00263430 2/13/2008 CACEO 65.00 AP - 00263432 2/13/2008 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66.75 AP - 00263433 2/13/2008 CALBO 150.00 AP - 00263434 2/13/2008 CALSENSE 2,054.06 AP - 00263434 2/13/2008 CALSENSE 1,104.41 AP - 00263436 2/13/2008 CASTILLO, JESSIE 250.00 AP-00263437 2/13/2008 CDW-G 586.26 AP - 00263437 2/13/2008 CDW-G ~ 20,662.10 AP - 00263438 2/13/2008 CERRITOS COLLEGE THEATRE DEPT. 80.00 AP - 00263439 2/13/2008 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 80.55 AP - 00263440 2/13/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 P16 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aae-tda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00263442 2/13/2008 COLLIER, ADAM 2,300.00 AP - 00263443 2/13/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 34.30 AP - 00263443 2/13/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY -75.78 AP - 00263444 2/13/2008 COMFORT INN 976.20 AP - 00263446 2/13/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 5,422.84 AP - 00263447 2/13/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00263449 2/13/2008 CPS HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES 200.00 AP - 00263450 2/13/2008 CRAIG FIRE PROTECTION 114.84 AP - 00263451 2/13/2008 CR[ME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 00263452 2/13/2008 CSMFO 1,200.00 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.93 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.27 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 581.82 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.64 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.50 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.95 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 262.62 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 559.21 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.89 AP-00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]49.57 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.30 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 529.44 AP - 00263454 2!13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.66 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.99 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.64 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.49 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.32 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.62 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.60 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 318.48 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 423.55 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.03 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.30 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151.80 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.85 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.67 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 14].16 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 516.65 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.51 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270.60 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 209.42 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 258.23 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.98 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 837.18 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.30 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 309.17 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.91 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.09 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.43 AP - 00263454 2/] 3/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.43 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.26 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.56 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.16 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.44 P17 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 Agenda Check Reeister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.64 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.15 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.28 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.93 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 979.81 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.34 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.27 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.94 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.29 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.93 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.33 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.53 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.15 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 662.95 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.90 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.71 AP - 00263454 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68 AP - 00263455 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 520.00 AP - 00263456 2/13/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 665.00 AP - 00263457 2/13/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 723.75 AP - 00263458 2/13/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 569.75 AP - 00263458 2/13/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 534.65 AP - 00263460 2/13/2008 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 270.00 AP - 00263461 2/13/2008 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 102.69 AP - 00263461 2/13/2008 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 7529 AP - 00263461 2/13/2008 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 75.29 AP - 00263462 2/13/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 22.23 AP - 00263464 2/13/2008 DMJM HARRIS 14,643.86 AP - 00263464 2/13/2008 DMJM HARRIS 2,988.17 AP - 00263465 2/13/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP - 00263465 2/13/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 3,905.00 AP - 00263465 2/13/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 745.00 AP - 00263466 2/13/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 456.73 AP - 00263466 2/13/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 364.12 AP - 00263466 2/13/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 34.74 AP - 00263466 2/13/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 42.41 AP - 00263467 2/13/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 48.49 AP - 00263468 2/13/2008 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00263469 2/13/2008 EXTREME ANIMAL NUTRITION 290.36 AP - 00263470 2/13/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 465.00 AP - 00263471 2/13/2008 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 485.04 AP - 00263472 2/13/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 105.98 AP - 00263472 2/13/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC -6.47 AP - 00263473 2/13/2008 FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT 6,250.00 AP - 00263474 2/13/2008 FOREST CITY 2.00 AP - 00263475 2/13/2008 GAIL MATERIALS 821.86 AP - 00263476 2/13/2008 GIONET, ARMAND 600.00 AP - 00263477 2/13/2008 GLOBALSTAR 1,091.72 AP - 00263478 2/13/2008 GOLDEN WEST OIL INC 125.00 AP - 00263479 2/13/2008 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 12,000.00 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 164.48 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 1,146.40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ] 0 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asrenda Check Re¢ister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 43.70 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 557.93 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 557.93 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 306.87 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 1,755.25 AP - 00263480 2/13/2008 GRAINGER 45.93 AP - 00263481 2/13/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,523.42 AP - 00263482 2/13/2008 HAIR CHARISMA 39.52 AP - 00263483 2/13/2008 HAMMER, ANDREW 400.00 AP - 00263484 2/13/2008 HASZ FUND CONTROL INC 10,000.00 AP - 00263485 2/13/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 291.95 AP - 00263485 2/13/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 225.34 AP - 00263485 2/13/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 23.85 AP - 00263486 2/13/2008 HOGLE-IRELAND 14,028.52 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 82.97 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 609.06 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 810.81 AP - 00263487 2/13/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 692.84 AP - 00263488 2/13/2008 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC 1,588.03 AP - 00263490 2/13/2008 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATK 454.30 AP - 00263492 2/13/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 454.00 AP - 00263494 2/13/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 328.61 AP - 00263494 2/13/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 147.17 AP - 00263495 2/13/2008 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 118.53 AP - 00263496 2/13/2008 JAY, RICHARD 107.74 AP - 00263497 2/13/2008 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 175.00 AP - 00263499 2/13/2008 JONES, ROBERT 3,115.00 AP - 00263500 2/13/2008 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,376.48 AP - 00263501 2/13/2008 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 1,700.00 AP - 00263501 2/13/2008 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 650.00 AP - 00263502 2/13/2008 KRC CONSTRUCTION INC 2,332.00 AP - 00263503 2/13/2008 KUZMINSKI, CHERISE 24.24 AP - 00263504 2/13/2008 L E H AND ASSOCIATES 5,600.00 AP - 00263506 2/13/2008 LAWN TECH EQUIPMENT COMPANY 479.20 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 1882 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 151.19 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.56 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.40 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 54.83 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 27.09 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.77 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 46.31 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 3954 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.23 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 25.60 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 186.63 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 146.39 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.71 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.09 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 212.71 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 66.13 P19 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.02 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 13.98 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.56 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 997.44 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.71 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.06 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 23].29 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 125.42 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 305.08 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 61.32 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.87 AP - 00263508 2/] 3/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.22 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 44.87 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 306.97 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 185.33 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4].75 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 1277 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 64.26 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.63 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 200.98 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 57.55 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 39.38 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.69 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.71 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 83.68 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 39.49 AP - 00263508 2/13/2005 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 34.94 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.03 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 96.81 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 77.32 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 621.95 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 13.64 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 153.00 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 67.03 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 25.24 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 74.26 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 247.54 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.58 AP - 00263508 2/13/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 28.40 AP - 00263509 2/13/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 206.88 AP - 00263510 2/13/2008 MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 6,092.25 AP - 0026351 I 2/13/2008 MANSOURI, IRAJ 4,920.00 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,930.05 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,998.12 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IA'C 5,059.08 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.74 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,105.76 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,563.77 AP - 002635 ] 2 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 22,188.27 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,701.90 AP - 002635 ] 2 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 9,123.15 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,910.52 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,51 ].22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,950.23 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 9,718.59 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,003.77 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 846.26 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,181.84 AP - 00263512 2/13/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,022.47 AP - 00263513 2/13/2008 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 177.04 AP - 00263514 2/13/2008 MARTINEZ UN10N SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00263514 2/13/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00263514 2/13/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00263514 2/13/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 150.00 AP - 00263514 2/13/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00263515 2/13/2008 MCINTOSH AICP, ANNE BROWNING 375.00 AP - 00263516 2/13/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 40.95 AP - 00263517 2/13/2008 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC, PAUL C 399.87 AP - 00263517 2/13/2008 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC, PAUL C 4,000.00 AP - 00263518 2/13/2008 MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS 52.95 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 45.51 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 379.13 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.39 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.31 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 142.29 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -56.02 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 94.71 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 106.24 AP - 00263519 2/13!2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 56.02 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -25.83 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 52.66 AP - 00263519 2/13/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 34.79 AP - 00263520 2/13/2008 NATURES EARTH PRODUCTS INC 628.19 AP - 00263520 2/13/2008 NATURES EARTH PRODUCTS INC 1,155.86 AP - 00263521 2/13/2008 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 7,500.00 AP - 00263522 2/13/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 96.00 AP - 00263524 2/13/2008 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 65.32 AP - 00263525 2/13/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 110.91 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.79 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.71 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.01 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 13.19 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 75.64 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.32 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 64.09 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,244.40 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4S 1.42 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.71 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 5.92 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.57 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 40.65 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.83 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 22.09 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 62.74 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 22.17 P21 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout' Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 57.50 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 97.00 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 78.08 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 153.12 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 150.01 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 96.87 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.64 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 169.88 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 109.48 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.33 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 618.31 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.99 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 17.56 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 344.26 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 13.51 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 115.14 AP - 00263527 2/13/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.76 AP - 00263528 2/13/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 162.30 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.37 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 141.78 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 118.48 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.51 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.70 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.94 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15.28 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.37 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.01 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.05 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 360.88 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 34.18 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 33.39 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 0.99 AP - 00263529 2/13/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.23 AP - 00263530 2/13/2008 PAPA 70.00 AP - 00263531 2/13/2008 PABON, SONIA 250.00 AP - 00263532 2/13/2008 PALMER, FRANCIE 1,754.50 AP - 00263533 2/13/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 18.00 AP - 00263533 2/13/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 181.00 AP - 00263533 2/13/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 30.00 AP - 00263533 2/13/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 522.36 AP - 00263534 2/13/2008 PHONG, BRYAN 100.00 AP - 00263536 2/13/2008 PLATINUM PR 5,000.00 AP - 00263537 2/13/2008 PORT SUPPLY 1,386.02 AP - 00263538 2/13/2008 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 76.82 AP - 00263539 2/13/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80 AP - 00263541 2/13/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 253.50 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.00 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 323.07 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 61.04 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 51.48 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 49.02 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 59.91 AP - 00263542 2/]3/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 301.85 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.08 P22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: ]6:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check RePister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 184.72 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 53.14 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.88 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 199.75 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 51.48 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 49.02 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 232.68 AP - 00263542 2/] 3/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 336.85 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 238.27 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 86.09 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 235.80 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 390.64 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 151.04 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 49.02 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 38.51 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 515.43 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 77.85 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 171.32 AP - 00263542 2/13/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00263545 2/13/2008 RCPFA 7,353.02 AP - 00263546 2/13/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 155.69 AP - 00263547 2/13/2008 REMOTE PRODUCTIONS INC 2,000.00 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 893.07 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 2,533.05 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 6,78888 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 478.28 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 8,370.09 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 3,588.70 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 9,28785 AP - 00263548 2/13/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 175.13 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,741.60 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 132.00 AP - 00263550 2/13/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,717.89 AP - 00263551 2/13/2008 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 348.36 AP - 00263552 2/13/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 97.50 AP - 00263552 2/13/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00 AP - 00263553 2/13/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 48.00 AP - 00263554 2/13/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 181.90 AP - 00263554 2/13/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 177.65 AP - 00263554 2/13/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 487.02 AP - 00263554 2/13/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP - 00263554 2/13/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 2,295.17 AP - 00263555 2/13/2008 SAEIDI, ARDY 72.00 AP - 00263556 2/13/2008 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 596.51 AP - 00263557 2/13/2008 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 2,536.78 AP - 00263558 2/13/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 123.32 AP - 00263558 2/13/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 115.65 AP - 00263562 2/] 3/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 56,229.93 AP - 00263562 2/13/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 178.00 AP - 00263563 2/13/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 48.00 AP - 00263564 2/13/2008 SC FUELS 10,701.29 P23 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263564 2/13/2008 SC FUELS -105.27 AP - 00263564 2/13/2008 SC FUELS 14,777.97 AP - 00263565 2/13/2008 SCHEITHAUER, KRISTIN 2,418.75 AP - 00263565 2/13/2008 SCHEITHAUER, KRISTIN 50.00 AP - 00263566 2/13/2008 SECC CORP 500.00 AP - 00263567 2/13/2008 SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES INC 6,304.71 AP - 00263567 2/13/2008 SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES INC 4,495.21 AP - 00263567 2/13/2008 SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES INC -580.28 AP - 00263569 2/13/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 323.25 AP - 00263570 2/13/2008 SKILL PATH INC 199.00 AP - 00263570 2/13/2008 SKILL PATH INC 199.00 AP - 00263572 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,810.65 AP - 00263572 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 1,656.09 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.54 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.02 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.37 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.59 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.96 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.73 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.13 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.45 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.29 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.64 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.06 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.95 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.28 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.49 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.68 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.75 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.97 P24 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor_Name Amount AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2867 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.77 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.10 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.18 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.81 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.09 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.45 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.69 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.10 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.97 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.73 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.60 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.28 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 172.86 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.98 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.60 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.89 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.49 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.14 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.14 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 182.16 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.90 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.50 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.07 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.48 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ]4.98 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.05 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00263579 2/li/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.41 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,609.12 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.27 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.63 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 44.92 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1651 P25 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check llate Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.31 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.16 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,632.63 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHEIN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.32 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.80 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.63 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.67 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.71 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.73 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.91 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 271.54 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.49 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.57 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.88 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.25 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.59 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,027.56 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.86 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.50 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.82 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 16.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.89 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.80 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.56 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.55 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.56 AP - 00263579 2/] 3/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.01 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.60 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHEIN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 15.87 P26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layou[ Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.47 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.96 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.36 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERNr CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.64 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.17 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.49 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.91 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,429.19 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 620.00 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,420.37 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.48 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.90 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.68 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 645.74 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.93 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.25 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.10 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 532.20 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.94 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.11 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 261.54 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.27 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.42 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.78 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.13 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 637.62 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 618.12 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.53 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.69 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.76 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.71 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.97 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.02 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,212.04 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.28 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.68 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.24 P27 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.00 AP - 00263579 2/] 3/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 225.60 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.52 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.23 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.16 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.43 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.32 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.61 AP - 00263579 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,102.58 AP - 00263580 2/13/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 272.55 AP - 00263581 2/13/2008 SPECIALTIES INC 4,405.53 AP - 00263582 2/13/2008 SPINITAR 295.00 AP - 00263583 2/13/2008 STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES 2,178.14 AP - 00263584 2/13/2008 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,185.25 AP - 00263584 2/13/2008 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,777.88 AP - 00263585 2/13/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 900.00 AP - 00263586 2/13/2008 SUNRISE FORD 47.69 AP - 00263587 2/13/2008 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 45.26 AP - 00263588 2/13/2008 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 400.39 AP - 00263589 2/13/2008 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 512.75 AP - 00263590 2/13!2008 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORS ASSOC SOU" 10.00 AP - 00263591 2/13/2008 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 73.70 AP - 00263591 2/13/2008 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 5.13 AP - 00263592 2/13/2008 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00263592 2/13/2008 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00263593 2/]3/2008 TUSTIN, CITY OF 275.00 AP - 00263595 2/13/2008 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 160.00 AP - 00263595 2/13/2008 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 80.00 AP - 00263596 2/13/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 952.79 AP - 00263596 2/13/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 694.91 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 857.17 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.08 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.08 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 1,120.68 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00263597 2/13/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00263598 2/13/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 48,504.24 AP - 00263599 2/13/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 259.77 AP - 00263599 2/13/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,987.28 AP-00263600 2/13/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00 AP - 00263601 2!13/2008 UPS 24.13 AP - 00263601 2/!3/2008 UPS 123.46 AP - 00263601 2/13/2008 UPS 29.08 AP - 00263602 2/13/2008 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 440.00 AP - 00263603 2/13/2008 VANIPARO LLC 930.00 AP - 00263604 2/] 3/2008 VEND U COMPANY 62.87 AP - 00263604 2/13/2008 VEND U COMPANY 42.94 AP - 00263604 2/] 3/2008 VEND U COMPANY 52.80 AP - 00263606 2/] 3/2008 VERIZON 67.16 P28 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: ] 6:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 21.39 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.11 AP-00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 1,470.91 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 179.91 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 44.84 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 146.49 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 367.83 AP-00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP-00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP-00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.82 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 117.79 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP-00263606 2/]3/2008 VERIZON 128.10 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 8857 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VER[ZON 68.15 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263606 2/13/2008 VERIZON 356.02 AP - 00263607 2/13/2008 VICTORIA ARBORS LLC 8,550.00 AP - 00263608 2/13/2008 VILLA PACIFICA APARTMENTS 100.00 AP - 00263609 2/13/2008 VILLENAS, FABIAN 41.00 AP - 00263610 2/13/2008 VISTA PAINT 21.78 AP - 00263610 2/13/2008 VISTA PAINT 39.60 AP - 00263611 2/13/2008 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 539.68 AP - 00263613 2/13/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,223.33 AP - 00263613 2/13/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 376.96 AP - 00263613 2/13/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLI' 130.83 P29 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263613 2/13/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,043.94 AP - 00263613 2/13/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 113.08 AP - 00263614 2/13/2008 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 2,474.62 AP - 00263615 2/13/2008 WLC ARCHITECTS 2,448.00 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 7,606.79 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 9,621.12 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 6,539.10 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,102.91 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,998.72 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 7,835.37 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 9,608.40 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 6,196.13 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,268.15 AP - 00263616 2/13/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,814.42 AP - 00263617 2/13/2008 WU, JONATHAN T. 125.00 AP - 00263619 2/13/2008 YEE, LARRY 22.00 AP - 00263620 2/13/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 208.18 AP - 00263620 2/13/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 111.32 AP - 00263620 2/13/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 460.84 AP - 00263620 2/13/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 61.20 AP - 00263620 2/13/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 119.02 AP - 00263620 2/]3/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 165.12 AP - 00263620 2/]3/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 406.12 AP - 00263621 2/13/2008 US POSTMASTER 1,100.00 AP - 00263623 2/20/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 19.40 AP - 00263623 2/20/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 88.14 AP - 00263624 2/20/2008 ABLETRONICS 20.43 AP - 00263625 2/20/2008 ACCOMODATING IDEAS INC. 288.94 AP - 00263626 2/20/2008 ACME BALLOON CO. 225.00 AP - 00263626 2/20/2008 ACME BALLOON CO. 225.00 AP - 00263627 2/20/2008 ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOFTWARE 329.72 AP - 00263628 2/20/2008 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6,901.01 AP - 00263629 2/20/2008 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,050.00 AP - 00263629 2/20/2008 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 175.00 AP - 00263630 2/20/2008 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 483.50 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 342.91 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 132.76 AP - 00263631 2/20/2008 AIRGAS WEST 101.87 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 AL"CA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ] 6:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P31 Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00263633 2/20/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00263634 2/20/2008 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 605.83 AP - 00263635 2/20/2008 ANDREWS, SHALONDA 250.00 AP - 00263637 2/20/2008 ARCED, MARICRUZ 50.00 AP - 00263638 2/20/2008 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 669.21 AP - 00263639 2/20/2008 ARMA INTERNATIONAL INC 215.00 AP - 00263640 2/20/2008 ASSI SECURITY 525.00 AP - 00263641 2/20/2008 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC 19,992.00 AP - 00263642 2/20/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,000.00 AP - 00263642 2/20/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,460.00 AP - 00263642 2/20/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,000.00 AP - 00263642 2/20/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 4,167.00 AP - 00263642 2/20/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,000.00 AP - 00263643 2/20/2008 AVID MICROSHIP ID SYSTEM 10,083.63 AP - 00263644 2/20/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 138.27 AP - 00263644 2/20/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 227.33 AP - 00263644 2/20/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 47.41 AP - 00263644 2/20/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 9.47 AP - 00263645 2/20/2008 BAKER, ARLENE 300.00 AP - 00263646 2/20/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 8,948.44 , AP - 00263646 2/20/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 393.54 AP - 00263646 2/20/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,874.85 AP - 00263647 2/20/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 390.82 AP - 00263647 2/20/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 195.03 AP - 00263648 2/20/2008 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 725.00 AP - 00263648 2/20/2008 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 775.00 AP - 00263649 2/20/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 2,355.58 AP - 00263649 2/20/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 507.50 AP - 00263650 2/20/2008 BEARINGS & DRIVES INC. 412.49 AP - 00263651 2/20/2008 BERON, RHONDA 100.00 AP - 00263652 2/20/2008 BESINAIZ, CANDLE 250.00 AP - 00263653 2/20/2008 BIAGLOW, JANET 100.00 AP - 00263654 2/20/2008 BMI 218.36 AP - 00263654 2/20/2008 BMI 16.26 AP - 00263655 2/20/2008 BONILLA, ADRIANA 500.00 AP - 00263656 2/20/2008 BOYCE FOREST PRODUCTS INC. 436.39 AP - 00263657 2/20/2008 BOYD, MELISSA 60.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 729.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 670.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,007.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 3,762.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,415.20 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODAR"f BOOKS 933.35 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODAR"f BOOKS 14.93 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P32 A>;enda Check Reeister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.29 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.88 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 93.68 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 102.37 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.]8 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.59 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.44 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.43 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS ] 2.31 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 56.44 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.22 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.17 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33 APeuda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.24 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 82.06 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,387.61 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.59 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.34 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 811.28 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 56.16 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.22 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 73.57 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 47.43 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 163.89 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2,971.10 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 76.61 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 74.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.34 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 223.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 174.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 98.11 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.90 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS ]0.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 234.79 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2!20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.~ 1 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.14 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 185.81 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.80 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 435.63 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 149.17 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.65 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.14 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.54 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 47.43 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 387.88 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 53.40 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 90.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.32 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.92 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.19 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 39.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 127.29 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.60 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 291.91 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.19 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.05 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 130.64 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 763.25 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.07 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 413.32 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.99 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.89 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 68.68 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.78 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.95 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.4] User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Aeenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1282 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS S.S 1 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.49 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 34.11 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.06 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.S 1 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.34 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 134.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2985 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 7 72 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 413.59 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.79 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 571.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 160.11 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.09 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,160.78 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 156.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 619.25 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.66 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.06 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 39.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2226 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.90 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 0.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.22 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 298.13 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.33 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.]4 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 176.60 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.30 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.39 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 97.73 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.13 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Dale: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Asenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 261.10 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 548.86 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.05 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 251.07 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 115.25 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.20 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 773.85 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.23 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 30.12 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 0.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.14 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.43 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 80.57 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 52.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.07 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.09 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 104.61 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4438 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.63 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.31 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.44 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 66.75 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.57 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.98 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.95 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 200.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.60 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 285.17 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.92 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 168.94 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 389.60 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 69.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.89 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.61 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 545.16 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 191.53 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 206.56 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 100.04 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37 Asenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.24 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.71 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.58 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.58 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.49 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.05 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 18.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 18.00 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 37.72 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 18.39 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.13 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.24 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 59.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.65 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 93.53 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 104.80 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.48 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.92 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.30 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 75.18 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.89 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 30.48 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.40 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.31 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.33 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 18.42 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.75 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.21 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1935 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 79.61 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 64.83 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 54.44 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 167.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 35.80 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomai[ Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.29 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.31 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.15 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.14 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.41 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.05 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.73 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.90 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 196.21 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 93.63 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.82 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 35.71 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.95 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.26 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.33 AP - 00263667 2/20/2008 BRODART BOOKS 715.36 AP - 00263668 2/20/2008 BUILDING ELECTRONIC CONTROLS INC 315.00 AP - 00263670 2/20/2008 CACEO 65.00 AP - 00263670 2/20/2008 CACEO 65.00 AP - 00263671 2/20/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 318.57 AP - 00263672 2/20/2008 CAL POLY POMONA 42.00 AP - 00263673 2/20/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 372.03 AP - 00263674 2/20/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 47.58 AP - 00263675 2/20/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00263676 2/20/2008 CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATIO 750.00 AP - 00263677 2/20/2008 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 165.00 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 3,092.43 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 3,941.13 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 3,847.23 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 6] 8.76 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 3,259.44 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 2,225.23 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 1,636.10 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 3,174.59 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 2,814.79 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE ],546.22 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 1,718.59 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 795.54 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 6,188.19 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 1,716.56 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 1,548.81 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 5,149.65 AP - 00263678 2/20/2008 CALSENSE 2,203.22 AP - 00263679 2/20/2008 CANO, ALEXANDRO 100.00 AP - 00263679 2/20/2008 CANO, ALEXANDRO liS.00 AP - 00263682 2/20/2008 CASH, PAUL 543.20 AP - 00263683 2/20/2008 CASTANEDA, ARNOLD 250.00 P38 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263684 2/20/2008 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 5,174.50 AP - 00263685 2/20/2008 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 4,619.29 AP - 00263686 2/20/2008 CHAUDHRY, KRISHAU SS9.7S AP - 00263687 2/20/2008 CISNEROS, JENNY 250.00 AP - 00263688 2/20/2008 CITY RENTALS 32.43 AP - 00263689 2/20/2008 CLARK, DEBORAH 39.00 AP - 00263690 2/20/2008 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 231.94 AP - 00263691 2/20/2008 COLLETTE VACATIONS 17,478.00 AP - 00263692 2/20/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 192.SS AP - 00263693 2/20/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 58.60 AP - 00263693 2/20/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 328.08 AP - 00263693 2/20/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 111.21 AP - 00263695 2/20/2008 COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL, THE 4,850.00 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 160.02 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 53.34 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00263696 2/20/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 280.04 AP - 00263697 2/20/2008 CRIDLAND, KYLE 24.24 AP - 00263698 2/20/2008 CRUZ, SANDRA 31.85 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.75 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.67 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.09 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 383.47 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.18 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.57 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.25 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 436.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.63 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.29 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.75 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.82 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.96 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 218.73 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.62 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4S.6S AP - 0026370] 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.29 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.20 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.95 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.47 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1SS.79 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 508.67 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.41 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.07 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.50 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 221.39 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.33 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.89 P39 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.94 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 436.22 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.99 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.65 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.95 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.60 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.60 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.60 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.57 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 168.19 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]74.84 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.31 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.94 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 286.56 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.85 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 269.27 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.96 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.26 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 53.63 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.18 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.51 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 424.88 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 258.63 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.29 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.21 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.05 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.86 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.15 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.39 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 281.40 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.39 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 325.67 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 204.44 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 431.53 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.66 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.32 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.65 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.87 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.25 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.13 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.83 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.70 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.47 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.88 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 330.02 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT li8.88 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 27927 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.59 AP - 00263701 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.21 AP - 0026370! 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.94 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,584.91 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,628.28 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 492.22 P40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: ] 6:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 tluough 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.00 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.00 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.11 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 808.15 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 242.09 AP - 00263702 2/20/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,163.23 AP - 00263703 2/20/2008 CUNNINGHAM, KAREN 250.00 AP - 00263704 2/20/2008 DAMES INC, ALBERT W 81,953.89 AP - 00263704 2/20/2008 DAMES INC, ALBERT W -8,195.39 AP - 00263705 2/20/2008 DAMS, AZIZA 7.58 AP - 00263705 2/20/2008 DAMS, AZIZA 30.30 AP - 00263706 2/20/2008 DEE, TOM 99.00 AP - 00263707 2/20/2008 DELTA DENTAL 39,906.30 AP - 00263708 2/20/2008 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,395.10 AP - 00263709 2/20/2008 DIAMOND SQUARE LLC 18,400.00 AP - 00263710 2/20/2008 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 267.59 AP - 00263711 2/20/2008 DOUGLAS, LANCE 48.00 AP - 00263712 2!20/2008 DUMBELL MAN FITA'ESS EQUIPMENT, THE 160.04 AP - 00263713 2/20/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 129.41 AP - 00263713 2/20/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 66.18 AP - 00263713 2/20/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 113.03 AP - 00263714 2/20/2008 E.D.D. RIVERSIDE AREA COLLECTION OFFICE 36.99 AP - 00263715 2/20/2008 EDFUND 65.08 AP - 00263716 2/20/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,500.00 AP - 00263716 2/20/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 185.00 AP - 00263716 2/20/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 110.00 AP - 00263716 2/20/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP - 00263718 2/20/2008 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 2,750.00 AP - 00263719 2/20/2008 ENGINEERED PLUMBING 15.00 AP - 00263720 2/20/2008 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 792.64 AP - 00263721 2/20/2008 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00 AP - 00263721 2/20/2008 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00 AP - 00263722 2/20/2008 EXPERIAN 15,611.00 AP - 00263723 2/20/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 3,423.97 AP - 00263723 2/20/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 4.42 AP - 00263724 2/20/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.21 AP - 00263724 2/20/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 17.52 AP - 00263724 2/20/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.84 AP - 00263724 2/20/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.39 AP - 00263725 2/20/2008 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 737.50 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 212.80 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 117.04 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 16.50 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 465.00 AP - 00263726 2/20/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 523.13 AP - 00263728 2/20/2008 FISCHER, JANE 41.68 AP - 00263729 2/20/2008 FJS CABLE ENGINEERING INC 1,000.00 AP - 00263730 2/20/2008 FLANDERS, KELLEE 120.60 AP - 00263731 2/20/2008 FOOTHILL AREA COUNCIL OF BETA SIGNMA P 250.00 AP - 00263732 2/20/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 381.00 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263732 2/20/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 962.97 AP - 00263733 2/20/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 664.28 AP - 00263733 2/20/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 47.41 AP - 00263733 2/20/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 313.55 AP - 00263733 2/20/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 397.36 AP - 00263734 2/20/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 2,866.40 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 180.85 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 59.40 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 59.40 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 30.13 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 152.58 AP - 00263735 2/20/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 55.05 AP - 00263736 2/20/2008 GAPPCO LLC 6,340.00 AP - 00263737 2/20/2008 GE MONEY BANK/AMAZON 29.00 AP - 00263738 2/20/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 3,368.61 AP - 00263739 2/20/2008 GIRON, GABBY 25.00 AP - 00263740 2/20/2008 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATI 805.00 AP - 00263741 2/20/2008 GRAINGER 445.94 AP - 00263741 2/20/2008 GRAINGER 36.76 AP - 00263741 2/20/2008 GRAINGER 200.74 AP - 00263741 2/20/2008 GRAINGER 402.12 AP - 00263741 2/20/2008 GRAINGER 201.06 AP - 00263742 2/20/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 12,756.52 AP - 00263742 2/20/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 45,360.50 AP - 00263742 2/20/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC -9,812.16 AP - 00263742 2/20/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 40,004.56 AP - 00263743 2/20/2008 GRESSCO LTD 2,053.00 AP - 00263743 2/20/2008 GRESSCO LTD 138.05 AP - 00263744 2/20/2008 GUZMAN, ISABEL 99.33 AP - 00263745 2/20/2008 HALL & FOREMAN INC 8,000.00 AP - 00263747 2/20/2008 HANSON, BARRYE 10.00 AP - 00263748 2/20/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 38.00 AP - 00263748 2/20/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 362.70 AP - 00263749 2/20/2008 HARPER, JORDAN 441.37 AP - 00263750 2/20/2008 HARTZ, CHRIS 100.00 AP - 00263753 2/20/2008 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 950.00 AP - 00263754 2/20/2008 HUGHES, RANCE 12.12 AP - 00263755 2/20/2008 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 565.00 AP - 00263756 2/20/2008 IBM CORPORATION 285.43 AP - 00263756 2/20/2008 IBM CORPORATION -96.33 AP - 00263756 2/20/2008 IBM CORPORATION -128.14 AP - 00263756 2/20/2008 IBM CORPORATION 356.72 AP - 00263757 2/20/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 75.50 AP - 00263757 2/20/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 411.40 AP - 00263758 2/20/2008 INFRA SOURCE 10,000.00 AP - 00263758 2/20/2008 INFRA SOURCE 10,000.00 AP - 00263759 2/20/2008 INLAND EMPIRE FAMILY 1,030.00 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 355.00 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 352.50 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 472.50 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 210.00 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 227.50 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 468.75 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 472.50 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 34 Current Datc: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 445.00 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 126.25 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 240.00 AP - 00263760 2/20/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 473.75 AP - 00263761 2/20/2008 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY GROUP 3,200.00 AP - 00263761 2/20/2008 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY GROUP 50.00 AP - 00263762 2/20/2008 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 89.62 AP - 00263763 2/20/2008 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 85.00 AP - 00263763 2/20/2008 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 85.00 AP - 00263764 2/20/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 253.28 AP - 00263765 2/20/2008 JACK IN THE BOX # 3152 6.00 AP - 00263766 2/20/2008 JACOBO, SAM 1,478.60 AP - 00263767 2!20/2008 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 35.00 AP - 00263768 2/20/2008 JOEL JONS FURNITURE 344.80 AP - 00263769 2/20/2008 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 91.59 AP - 00263772 2/20/2008 KUCERA, JENNY 45.82 AP - 00263772 2/20/2008 KUCERA, JENNY 75.00 AP - 00263773 2/20/2008 L D I MECHANICAL 40.00 AP - 00263774 2/20/2008 LABANIEH, HISHAM 1,000.00 AP - 00263775 2/20/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION IN~ 96,605.00 AP - 00263775 2/20/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION IN~ -9,660.50 AP - 00263775 2/20/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION INi 110,372.00 AP - 00263775 2/20/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION INi -11,037.20 AP - 00263776 2/20/2008 LARA, DANIEL 500.00 AP - 00263776 2/20/2008 LARA, DANIEL 1,000.00 AP - 00263778 2/20/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00263780 2/20/2008 LIGHT BRIGADE, THE 700.00 AP - 00263782 2/20/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,175.00 AP - 00263784 2/20/2008 LOPEZ, JULIE 249.75 AP - 00263785 2/20/2008 LOS OSOS SOFTBALL BOOSTER 500.00 AP - 00263786 2/20/2008 MACY'S #241 3,139.98 AP - 00263787 2/20/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 426.69 AP - 00263788 2/20/2008 MANELA, ROSE 2412 AP - 00263789 2/20/2008 MARINO, BARBARA 42.50 AP - 00263789 2/20/2008 MARINO, BARBARA 32.50 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 275.80 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 378.90 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 125.70 AP - 00263790 2/20/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,565.91 AP - 00263791 2/20/2008 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 3,714.14 AP - 00263792 2/20/2008 MAUREEN KANE AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,220.00 AP - 00263793 2/20/2008 MC CLENDON'S 10.68 AP - 00263794 2/20/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 11.68 AP - 00263794 2/20/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 213.89 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 97.95 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 116.95 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 1,237.53 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 39.98 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 39.98 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 14.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 14.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 2798 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 27.98 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 155.93 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Curren[ Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Re:rister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 155.93 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 205.91 AP - 00263795 2/20/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 155.92 AP - 00263797 2/20/2008 MOORE, DAVID 400.00 AP - 00263798 2/20/2008 MOOREFIELD CONSTRUCTION 43.19 AP - 00263799 2/20/2008 MORALES, MELISSA 20.00 AP - 00263801 2/20/2008 MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS 205.09 AP - 00263802 2/20/2008 MULYATNA, DAVID 500.00 AP - 00263804 2/20/2008 NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION 125.00 AP - 00263805 2/20/2008 NIELSEN, NETTIE 300.00 AP - 00263806 2/20/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 72.00 AP - 00263807 2/20/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 1,458.00 AP - 00263807 2/20/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 466.00 AP - 00263808 2/20/2008 OCLC INC 45.35 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 75.46 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -17.95 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 49.49 AP -00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 281.42 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 5.28 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 38.57 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.42 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.18 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -14.32 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 6.01 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -4.50 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 93.60 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -20.88 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 31.61 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.12 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 71.33 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 84.11 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.62 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.66 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 70.71 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 149.01 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 163.28 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 310.19 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 105.95 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 161.98 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 135.61 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 145.83 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 756.41 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 299.24 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 35.90 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 453.82 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.74 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 126.28 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 15.74 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 270.44 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,141.08 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 36 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRA[ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 135.75 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 161.88 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -41.41 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.64 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 46.54 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 105.35 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.67 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.03 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 136.02 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 144.08 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.43 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 212.91 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 149.24 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 824.72 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 408.47 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 286.24 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 882.01 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 85.33 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 154.18 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 444.24 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.57 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.74 AP - 002638 ] 0 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.08 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 56.46 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 32.11 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 213.28 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 69.93 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 103.26 AP - 00263810 2/20/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.96 AP - 00263811 2/20/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 94.66 AP - 00263812 2/20/2008 OPEN APPS 810.00 AP - 00263813 2/20/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,165.30 AP - 00263813 2/20/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 824.70 AP - 00263814 2/20/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 3,470. ] 6 AP - 00263814 2/20/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 3,999.35 AP - 00263814 2/20/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 42.99 AP - 00263814 2/20/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 3,654.86 AP - 00263815 2/20/2008 PADFIELD, NELLY 250.00 AP - 00263816 2/20/2008 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00 AP - 00263817 2/20/2008 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 389.63 AP - 00263818 2/20/2008 PARS 3.500.00 AP - 00263819 2/20/2008 PARTIES UNLIMITED 150.00 AP - 00263820 2/20/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 86.47 AP - 00263821 2/20/2008 PAULA'S BEAUTY SALON 19.00 AP - 00263822 2/20/2008 PC TODAY 29.00 AP - 00263823 2/20/2008 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 70.58 AP - 00263823 2/20/2008 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00263824 2/20/2008 PEREZ, GLORIA 500.00 AP - 00263824 2/20/2008 PEREZ. GLORIA 500.00 AP - 00263825 2/20/2008 PERRY, LESLIE 450.00 AP - 00263828 2/20/2008 PIVOT GROUP INC 17,910.66 AP - 00263828 2/20/2008 PIVOT GROUP INC -1,791.07 AP - 00263829 2/20/2008 PMI 1,824.70 AP - 00263830 2/20/2008 PORTOCARRERO, MICHELLE 40.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 37 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46 Agenda Check Resister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263831 2/20/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 29,196.76 AP - 00263831 2/20/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -2,919.68 AP - 00263832 2/20/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 266.49 AP - 00263833 2/20/2008 PURCELL, ROBERT 24.00 AP - 00263834 2/20/2008 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS 29.95 AP - 00263835 2/20/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00 AP - 00263836 2/20/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL 3,860.00 AP - 00263837 2/20/2008 RANCHO ETIWANDA 685 LLC 10,540.00 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 107.59 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 98.97 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 1,897.20 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 90.35 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 1,048.01 AP - 00263838 2/20/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 987.46 AP - 00263839 2/20/2008 RAUSCH, TROY 400.00 AP - 00263840 2/20/2008 REARTE, NADINA 36.00 AP - 00263840 2/20/2008 REARTE, NADINA 36.00 AP - 00263841 2/20/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 1,456.36 AP - 00263841 2/20/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 14.98 AP - 00263841 2/20/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 1,099.28 AP - 00263841 2/20/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 7.49 AP - 00263841 2/20/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 7.49 AP - 00263842 2/20/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 48.19 AP - 00263843 2/20/2008 RIGS, LUIS 500.00 AP - 00263844 2/20/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 613.89 AP - 00263844 2/20/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 828.45 AP - 00263844 2/20/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,442.33 AP - 00263844 2/20/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 2,968.64 AP - 00263844 2/20/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,829.09 AP - 00263845 2/20/2008 RK DIVERSIFIED ENTERTAINMENT INC 240.00 AP - 00263846 2/20/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00263846 2/20/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 112.00 AP - 00263847 2/20/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 48.00 AP - 00263848 2/20/2008 RODRIGUEZ, DIANE 100.00 AP - 00263849 2/20/2008 ROSEN PUBLISHING AND POWERKIDS 946.05 AP - 00263850 2/20/2008 SADDLEBACK MATERIALS COMPANY INC 1,616.25 AP - 00263851 2/20/2008 SAEIDI, ARDY 48.00 AP - 00263853 2/20/2008 SALMAN, BEATRIZ 250.00 AP - 00263854 2/20/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 40.25 AP - 00263855 2/20/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,081,817.75 AP - 00263855 2/20/2008 SAN BER,NARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 27,651.25 AP - 00263856 2/20/2008 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY COLLEGE 100.00 AP - 00263857 2/20/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 48.00 AP - 00263859 2/20/2008 SCHULTE, LAWRENCE 100.00 AP - 00263860 2/20/2008 SCIENTIST FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST 500.00 AP - 00263861 2/20/2008 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00 AP - 00263862 2/20/2008 SCRIPTLOGIC CORP 1,799.00 AP - 00263863 2/20/2008 SHEA INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 375.00 AP - 00263864 2/20/2008 SHEPHERD OF THE HILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH 9,030.00 AP - 00263865 2/20/2008 SHERATON GRAND SACRAMENTO HOTEL 491.91 AP - 00263866 2/20/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250.00 AP - 00263867 2/20/2008 SHOOK. STEVE 500.00 AP - 00263868 2/20/2008 SILVER STATE COACH INC 589.88 AP - 00263869 2/20/2008 SIMMONS, ARLENE 300.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 38 Current Date: 02/27/200 ReporCCK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47 Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263869 2/20/2008 SIMMONS, ARLENE 44.00 AP - 00263870 2/20/2008 SIR SPEEDY 1,998.69 AP - 00263872 2/20/2008 SOURCE GRAPHICS 2,700.00 AP - 00263873 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALI DJS 350.00 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.77 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.83 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.65 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.37 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.05 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.90 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.60 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.50 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.36 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.07 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 852.47 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.28 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.57 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.25 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.34 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.52 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.58 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 307.62 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 533.61 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 217.69 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.62 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.03 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,174.92 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,341.95 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.13 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.98 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.14 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 645.15 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.52 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHEIL'V CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.47 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.07 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.2] AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.07 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.66 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.72 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00263875 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 39 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 887.56 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.83 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,979.32 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.90 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,674.25 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,403.75 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64,358.85 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96 AP - 00263876 2/20/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80 AP - 00263877 2/20/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 966.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 720.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 840.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 210.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 210.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 210.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 210.00 AP - 00263878 2/20/2008 SPOONFACTORY 720.00 AP - 00263879 2/20/2008 STADIUM PLAZA NORTH OWNERS ASSOCIATI( 169.31 AP - 00263880 2/20/2008 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 179.00 AP - 00263881 2/20/2008 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 88,176.25 AP - 00263881 2/20/2008 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 20,287.90 AP - 00263882 2/20/2008 STOFA, JOSEPH ]3.00 AP - 00263884 2/20/2008 SUMMERS, MELODY 125.00 AP - 00263885 2/20/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 185.00 AP - 00263885 2/20/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 600.00 AP - 00263886 2/20/2008 TAMMY RAPP PHOTOGRAPHY 150.00 AP - 00263887 2/20/2008 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 157.05 AP - 00263888 2/20/2008 TARGET CORPORATION 425.60 AP - 00263890 2/20/2008 TORRES, JOSH 54.54 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,164.40 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 743.18 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,644.91 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,086.99 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,309.32 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,121.34 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,935.15 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,645.59 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 140.55 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 641.13 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 11,191.00 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 27,500.00 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,510.82 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,500.00 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,576.54 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,668.89 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 10,399.45 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 27,156.75 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,145.90 P48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 40 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,521.30 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 57.34 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,162.00 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,160.12 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,014.07 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,721.57 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,695.61 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 16,065.08 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 10,145.49 AP - 00263891 2/20/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,535.46 AP - 00263892 2/20/2008 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 169.50 AP - 00263894 2/20/2008 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES EVC 433.59 AP - 00263895 2/20/2008 UNITED TRAFFIC 29847 AP - 00263895 2/20/2008 UNITED TRAFFIC 638.96 AP - 00263896 2/20/2008 UNITED WAY 309.82 AP - 00263897 2/20/2008 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 13,785.23 AP - 00263898 2/20/2008 US POSTMASTER 3,000.00 AP - 00263900 2/20/2008 VASTA, WILLIAM 269.38 AP - 00263901 2/20/2008 VEND U COMPANY 39.60 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 19.82 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 73.50 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 34.08 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 21.62 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 V ERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 8857 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 8857 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 39.19 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 V ERIZON 199.67 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 31.62 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 34.08 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 65.08 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 33.13 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 21.07 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 35.18 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 148.70 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 21.07 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 8857 P49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 41 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:53:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check ReP_ister 2/13/2008 through 2/26/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 180.71 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 32.55 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 35.19 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 43.20 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 43.20 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 37.67 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 135.28 AP - 00263903 2/20/2008 VERIZON 100.75 AP - 00263904 2/20/2008 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 500.00 AP - 00263905 2/20/2008 VISTA PAINT 1,017.22 AP - 00263907 2/20/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 723.17 AP - 00263908 2/20/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 19.03 AP - 00263908 2/20/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 34.11 AP - 00263908 2/20/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 57.72 AP - 00263908 2/20/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 59.27 AP - 00263908 2/20/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 113.03 AP - 00263910 2/20/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 320.85 AP - 00263911 2/20/2008 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10 AP - 00263912 2/20/2008 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 184.24 AP - 00263913 2/20/2008 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 1,243.45 AP - 00263914 2/20/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC ],365.74 AP - 00263914 2/20/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 69.93 AP - 00263915 2/20/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 247.18 AP - 00263915 2/20/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 417.99 AP - 00263916 2/20/2008 WHITESIDE, BESSIE 32.00 AP - 00263917 2/20/2008 WILLIAMS, VANESSA 100.00 AP - 00263917 2/20/2008 WILLIAMS, VANESSA 256.75 AP - 00263918 2/20/2008 WITHERS & SANDGREN LTD 8,250.00 AP - 00263919 2/20/2008 WORLD BOOK INC 968.67 AP - 00263920 2/20/2008 XLNT TINT OF ANAHEIM INC 135.00 AP - 00263921 2/20/2008 YEE, LARRY 22.00 AP - 00263922 2/20/2008 ZAVALA, MARIO 15.00 AP - 00263923 2/20/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 221.45 AP - 00263924 2/21/2008 .INLAND DIRECT 1,080.00 Total for Check ID AP: 4,378,465.95 Total for Entity: 4,378,465.95 P50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 42 Current Date: 02/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:53:1 P51 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTbIENT RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer ~y~- Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1627176-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, routing of cracks, removal and replacement of damaged pavement, asphalt rubberized hot mix overlay, adjust utilities to grade, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1627176-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation is $250,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for March 11, 2008 and March 18, 2008, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 25, 2008. Mahdi City Manager/Community Development MA:RMD Attachments VICINITY MAP SITE ~ ^~ 19 H T a 30 a N ~ B LINE D HUR ST FOOTHILL BLVD m ~ ^ ^ ~~> > > > a^ VICTORI PARK Y W U D BNSF II I~ 4TH ST a 0 r x FROM CARNELIAN ST TO BERYL ST THOMAS GUIDE PAGE 572 GRID-G3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N y FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET x.T.s. ^ HILL E ~ u u r ILSO AVE w ~ w ~ N ST a a EMO V U ~] P53 RESOLUTION NO. d $- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. W H EREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street": BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 25, 2008, sealed bids or proposals for the "Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Califomia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of perdiem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. P54 RESOLUTION NO. March 5, 2008 Page 2 Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendarday or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in thattradefora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the AdministratorofApprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in P55 RESOLUTION NO. March 5, 2008 Page 3 Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. P56 RESOLUTION NO. March 5, 2008 Page 4 The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 5th day of March, 2008 Publish Dates: March 11 and March 18, 2008 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 5th day of March, 2008. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day P57 RESOLUTION NO. March 5, 2008 Page 5 of March, 2008. Executed this 5`h day of March, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: March 11 and March 18, 2008 P58 F I R E PROTECTION D 1 8 T R I C T StaffReport DATE: March 5, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,739.00 AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2007), ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $4,869.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5207 (O&M/CAPITAL SUPPLIES) AND $7,870.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY- EQUIPMENT) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the acceptance of grant revenue for Fire Protection District operations in the amount of $12,739.00 awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2007), administered by the State of California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Account No. 1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $4,869.00 into Account No. 1380501-5207 (O&M/CAPITAL SUPPLIES) and $7,870.00 into Account No. 1380501-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-EQUIPMENT). The grant is 100% funding with no matching funds required. BACKGROUND The Fiscal Year 2007 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP '07) provides funds to enhance the capability of State and Local units of government to prevent, deter, respond to, and recover from incidents of terrorism. The SHSP '07 grant funds will be used to purchase new radios, a rapid response wireless weather station, and accessories for District operations. Page 2 March 5, 2007 Approval for Homeland Security Grant 2007 Pricing for the Motorola radios is based on a piggyback purchase on the County of Los Angeles' contract to include the various radios, and accessories with acceptable terms and conditions and represents the best price currently available. Purchases of the Motorola radio products are direct from Motorola and the single source was previously approved and is on file in the Purchasing Division. Respectfully submitted, Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief P59 -2- P60 STAFF REPORT 1~. ~ ' dry rrcmo .mrr rr-CFR VT('FC T7Fp.1RTATFUT RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services By: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS CITY-OWNED MISCELLANEOUS RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approval be given to surplus the City-owned miscellaneous equipment, computer equipment and vehicles per the attached listing which are either no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property: material and supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City to request that the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Manager to dispose of City property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of surplus are as follows: transfer to another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply disposing of the equipment. The majority of items to be surplused are vehicles and computer equipment. If the City Council is in agreement, these items will be disposed through the best method determined by the Purchasing Manager. Respectfully submitted, John Gillison Administrative Services Director Attachment P61 Page 2 Vehicles Surphts 9ta~f report March 5, 2008 Unit # Year Manufacturer Description Vin # Fuel Type 414 1997 Chevy S-10 Long Bed 1GCCS14X4VK236392 UNL 557 2000 Ford F-150 Extra Cab 1 FTPXI7LOYK822728 UNL 601 1991 Ford Crown Victoria 2FACP72GXMX173730 UNL 640 1992 White Dump Truck, Front Load 4V2DCFHD3PN668419 DSL 646 1988 Deere 544E Loader 0 DSL 647 1989 Deere LoaderBackhoe T0510CB754711 DSL 808 1996 Ford E-350 Van IFTJS34F1THB33483 DSL 913 1991 Ford F-2510 Explorer 1FMUC22X8MUC04739 UNL 1208 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W6XK224670 UNL 1222 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W8XK223858 UNL 1321 1997 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13WXV2231330 UNL 1326 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W9XK223075 UNL 1327 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W7XK222796 UNL 1330 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W8XK223388 UNL 1334 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W6XK224698 UNL 1411 1997 Chevy S-10 Pick-up 1GCCS14XXVK236512 UNL 1500 1997 Ford F-250, Utility Bed 3FEHF25FIVMA42764 DSL 1501 1996 Ford F-250, Service Bed 1FDHX25F5TEB72406 DSL 1508 1997 Ford F-350, Stake Bed 1 FDKF37G8VE674562 UNL 1509 1997 Chevy S-10 Pick-up 1GCCS14X9VK236646 UNL 1510 1997 Chevy S-10 Pick-up 1GCCS14X9VK238087 UNL 1511 1997 Ford F-350, Stake Dump Bed 1FTJW35G6VE692870 DSL 1518 1997 Intl Tree Truck 1 HTSCABM8VH428089 DSL 1525 1999 Ford F-250, Utility Bed 1FTNF20S1XEC36820 UNL 1634 1999 Ford F-550 Sign Truck 1 FDAF56F5XEE37433 DSL 1691 1999 Ford F-250 Dumb Bed 1FTNF20F4XEE37436 DSL 1712 1997 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNDT13W6V2231339 UNL 1715 1997 Chevy S-10 Pick-up 1GCCS14X4VK238563 UNL 1716 1999 Chevy Blazer 4x4 1GNT13W6XK222403 UNL 811 2000 Ford Ex lover 1FMZU71X3YZB75720 UNL 1214 1996 Chevy Astro Van 1GNDM19WOTB176436 UNL Miscellaneous Equipment FA # Descri lion S/N 195 13" TVA/CR Combo 793WCD589 741 YA Pa erback Rounder 1675 Xerox co ier 5328 ODG109047 2671 YA Pa erback Rounder Microwave GE w/turntable 202KM00824 2-hamilton VR20 draft table 28J856 3 Steelcase Mauve Chairs D nix - Telecirc E ui ment A S5030555 1- ost-it holder Velco Bind 230 40289 Vac-115-05 foldin attachment 99398 P62 Page 3 Surphrs Staff report March 5, 2008 Velco Bind 292 2485 Xerox W ork Center XD 130df 24389 Di ital Video Camera 11530301 Camera Samsun / Evoca Zoom 115 9506594 XEROX L7G-154229 Brother Intellifax 2800 U56577J1653588 Safe-ori inall from IS office YA Pa erback Rounder YA Pa erback Rounder Tables 8' Chairs Gressco VHS Holders 20 +/- boxes Shelum books Monitor -Self Check 75884348 Monitor -Self Check 75884566 Self Check 2086 Self Check 2092 Bulletin Board E21011 M Eastman Printer Ribbon B136 Olivetti T ewriter Ribbon General Led er Comauter Equipment MFG. DESCRIPTION SERIAL# FA# PALLET # H.P. 15" MONITOR TW142612002 0708-1 H.P. 17" MONITOR MX92081932 0708-1 H.P. LASERJET 4500N JPMAED8220 002161 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903006 002404 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903010 002407 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902946 002414 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902987 002415 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US1402966 002409 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005709 002408 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US03011840 002490 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94210304 001244 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US93808244 001184 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94803804 001169 0708-1 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US92524298 001186 0708-1 P63 Page 4 Sruphrs Staaf report Mardi 5, 2008 H. P. VECTRA VLIB US92511228 001174 0708-1 H. P. 15" MY82016948 H .P. 15" CRT KR82197919 H .P. 15" CRT CN10532791 H .P. 15" LCD TW1360823 0708-2 H .P. 15" LCD CN22285813 0708-2 H .P. 15" LCD TW 14260015 0708-2 H .P. H.P. US94469919 001912 0708-2 H .P. H.P. US94011181 001369 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US14902997 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US22911323 002893 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US2310181 002948 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US149038024 002373 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US14902961 002395 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US14902960 002433 0708-2 H .P. VECTRA US9852651 001927 0708-2 H .P. Vectra VL420 US14902960 002433 0708-2 H .P. Vectra VL420 US14903838 002363 0708-2 H .P. Vectra VL420 US14903817 002366 0708-2 H .P. Vectra VL420 US15005713 002475 0708-2 H .P. Vectra VL420 US22910802 002951 0708-2 H.P. LAS ERJET 8100 DM VSGG00744 RC002125 0808-3 H. P. CRT 17" MX93127179 0808-3 H. P. CRT 17" KR80828628 0808-3 H. P. CRT 17" KR79846965 0808-3 H. P. MONITOR 15" TW13966201 0808-3 H. P. MONITOR 15" TW14261003 0808-3 H. P. MONITOR 15" TW13965886 0808-3 H. P. MONITOR 15" TW14161645 0808-3 H .P. MONITOR 15" TW15140932 0808-3 H .P. MONITOR 15" TW13760809 0808-3 H .P . MONITOR 15" CN222B5788 0808-3 P64 Page 5 Stuphis Stafr report Marrh 5,2008 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13761342 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903015 RC002457 0808-3 H.P.A8177S VECTRA VL420 US14902962 RC002437 0808-3 H.P.A8387T VECTRA VL420 US23101457 RC002914 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US22912771 RC002913 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902941 RC002480 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US1490297 RC002389 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902977 RC002478 0808-3 H.P. D9000E VECTRA VL18 US94470186 RC000455 0808-3 H.P.A8177S VECTRA VLIB US14903834 RC002384 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US93211536 RC001253 0808-3 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005714 002485 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902969 002449 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903001 002427 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903021 002422 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902986 002473 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902721 002428 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902952 002447 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005711 002398 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US1402974 002468 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902947 002496 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902998 002469 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US1402969 2416 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903005 002486 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903009 002446 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US144903826 002354 0807-4 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903002 002442 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" CN22265793 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" CN217B5955 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14369339 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14947555 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13760817 0807-4 P65 Page 6 ~~~~ H.P. MONITOR I5" TW13760808 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR IS" TW14161386 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13760727 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13966287 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14947792 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14947556 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13965600 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13760809 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13762895 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" CN22265808 0807-4 H.P. MONITOR 15" CN22265784 0807-4 H.P. VLI8 US49010010 002075 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94010186 002015 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94010008 001790 0807-5 H.P. VL400 US05204194 002178 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US03011777 02673 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US93211547 000006 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94010227 002109 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94469932 002083 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94767344 000018 0807-5 H.P. VL18 US94469845 002014 0807-5 H.P. VLIS US94469928 002024 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 17" D2837 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR81860455 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 17" MX91872533 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR81862187 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR81860451 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 15" D7825 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 15" MY7193803 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD CN21765959 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW14161400 0807-5 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW1194060 0807-5 P66 Page 7 Surplus Staiff report Mard15, 2008 IBM 15" Monitor T540 55-N3570 0807-5 IBM 15" Monitor T540 55-L2603 0807-5 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902983 RC002471 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902957 RC002431 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903029 RC002426 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US74902963 RC002436 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903818 RC002386 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005719 RC002483 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902945 RC002424 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903013 RC002451 0907-6 H.P. 17" MONITOR MX90421708 0907-6 H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81862267 0907-6 H.P. 15" MONITOR TW14161380 0907-6 H.P. IBM T540 15" MONITOR 55-L2601 0907-6 H.P. IBM T540 15" MONITOR 55-N2751 0907-6 H.P. IBM T55A 15" 55-X2179 0907-6 H.P. FARGO PRINTER 4250 90500091 RC000167 0907-6 H.P. SCANJET 5200c PRINTER SG94116114 RC000501 0907-6 H.P. TOSHIBA PORT REPLICATOR 79052956 0907-6 H.P. LOGITECH WIRELESS KEYBOARD MCT43108946 0907-6 H.P. I OMEGA ZIP DRIVE RC001607 0907-6 H.P. BUSINESS INKJET PRINER 2250 RC002180 0907-6 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005715 RC002448 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US22911496 RC002895 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL18 US14903008 RC002459 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902976 RC002540 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US22911555 RC002889 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005712 RC002456 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903024 RC002410 0907-7 H.P. 15" LCD D5063 TW13965587 ~` ~~ ~~ - 0907-7 H.P. 15" LCD D5063 TW13965732 ice' ° -~' ~~ a 0907-7 H.P. 15" LCD D5063 TW 14161638 ~~.-; tzT --Sk :t*i kY?.... 'rF~ -~«_ ~ 0907-7 I P67 Page 8 5~ report Mart;h 5, 2008 H.P. 15" LCD D5062 ,t~ TW 1240207 =~ '~~ ~' 0907-7 H.P. 15"CRT D2837 KR82087704 ;~~' ~~~k<'' 0907-7 H.P. 15" CRT D2837 KR82075649 "?_'~ '~. ~~ ~ 0907-7 H.P. 15" CRT D2837 f KR80825680 '~ ~~~~`~ 0907-7 CP COMPAQ 20" CRT r ,., ~: ~- 20FD221 EC977 ~% ~ ~%'~ 0907-7 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94803791 RC001480 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902950 RC002460 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902975 RC002432 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902944 RC002464 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005720 RC002452 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94010174 RC001118 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US3303685 RC001222 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94010157 RC000503 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL18 US93807862 RC001160 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US93212093 RC001242 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903836 RC002357 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902999 RC002465 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902996 RC002430 0907-8 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US932116000 RC000164 0907-8 CP VECTRA VL420 US93303668 RC000221 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW13761340 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW20142590 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW14162231 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW 1395597 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW 13761342 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW13760821 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD CN21785979 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" LCD TW13965591 0907-8 H.P. MONITOR 15" CRT KR82087697 0907-8 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2741 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2743 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2743 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-L2597 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-L2614 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N8323 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N3762 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2754 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2746 1007-9 P68 Page 9 ~~~~ IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2749 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-N2745 1007-9 IBM MONITOR TS40 15" 55-L2602 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNF28NM 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNFA2XF 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNFA460 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNF8373 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNFA32G 1007-9 IBM THINCLIENT BNFA4A3 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNFA2ZV 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNFA3R6 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNFA3VX 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNFA8K 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNG3212 1007-9 IBM THIN CLIENT BNFA2W9 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902948 RC002463 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902994 RC002479 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903814 RC002361 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US92423594 RC001299 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902956 RC002481 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903808 RC002358 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902995 RC002470 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903026 RC002394 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903825 RC002362 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94469849 RC001533 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94470114 RC001530 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US03006583 RC000276 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US92423767 RC001124 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94010176 RC001945 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94214570 RC001527 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US14903828 RC002376 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US9380424 RC001557 1007-9 P69 Page 10 Siuplus Staif report Mardi 5, 2008 H.P. VECTRA VLIS US96201544 RC001471 1007-9 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902972 RC002435 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902939 RC002396 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL18 US14902943 RC002453 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903809 RC002379 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903840 RC002375 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902982 RC002458 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902958 RC002390 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902935 RC002429 1007-10 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US15005721 RC002454 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13760829 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13965735 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14161362 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14161393 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW04501799 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW14261001 1007-10 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13760811 1007-10 H.P. SCANJET T400C CN1A650232 1007-10 H.P. DESKJET 1220C SG1B8130B3 1007-10 Panasonic PANASONIC VIDO CASSETTE REC. 10TA00053 1007-10 H.P. LASERJET 5 USKC235172 1007-10 H.P. DESKJET S95CX1 SG933130KP 1007-10 H.P. DESKJET 1120C SG96171316O 1007-10 tome a IOMEGA DVD-RW CJAE38009V 1007-10 Xerox XEROX WORK CENTER XD130DT 024389 1007-10 Viewsonic VIEW SONIC A1O050154877 1007-10 IBM MONITOR 15" 23-GB-387 1007-10 IBM MONITOR 15" 55-PD753 1007-10 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW14162230 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW13965731 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW14161397 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW13966024 1007-11 P7O Page 11 Surplus Staff report Marsh 5, ZDOS HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW 14947588 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN206A4471 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW 137062894 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW 14161390 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN217B5982 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW13965729 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW14161396 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN217B5977 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW14161389 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 TW13965726 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN216A2216 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN21765960 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN216A2210 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN216A2244 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN216A2237 1007-11 HP MONITOR 15" D5063 CN217B5958 1007-11 HP VECRA VLI8 US93211627 RC001221 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903025 RC002477 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US15005716 RC002466 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903816 RC002356 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US22911516 RC002890 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903819 RC002377 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903007 RC002402 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US1402988 RC002467 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14902990 RC002423 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903828 RC002403 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903823 RC002367 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903120 RC002383 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US14903810 RC002364 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL420 US93211323 RC000159 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL18 US14903027 RC002476 1007-11 HP VECTRA VL18 US22911481 RC002887 1007-11 P71 Page 12 ~~~~ HP VECTRA VLIB US93000187 RC000010 1007-11 HP VECTRA VLI8 US95201434 RC001273 1007-11 HP VECTRA VLIB US93212110 RC001217 1007-11 HP VECTRA VLI8 US2422505 RC001228 1007-11 HP VECTRA VLIB US94214581 RC001301 1007-11 HP 15" CRT MONITOR KR74846959 1107-12 HP 15" CRT MONITOR KR81862188 1107-12 HP 17" CRT MONITOR MY94211877 1107-12 HP 15" LCD TW1462235 1107-12 HP PRINTER RC001714 1107-12 HP 7916 PRINTER MY49FG912M RC000710 1107-12 SCANNER 6806102010 RC002245 1107-12 H.P. H.P. 15" D5063 MONITOR TW14260998 1107-13 H.P. H.P. 15" D5063 MONITOR TW13966274 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23Y6537 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 23YB533 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23PY344 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23Y6528 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23Y8516 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23YB530 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 23YB502 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 23YB513 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 23Y6500 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 V1D5826 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23XT918 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-A61 23YB544 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23YB527 1107-13 iBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23YB543 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23YB532 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-AB1 23YB531 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-H61 V1C1005 1107-13 IBM IBM 15"6636-HB1 V1D6530 1107-13 P72 Page 13 Siuplus S~f report March 5, 2008 IBM IBM 15"6636-H61 V1D6574 1107-13 IBM IBM 15"6636-H61 V1D6034 1107-13 H.P. IBM 15"6636-HB1 V1D6032 1107-13 IBM IBM 15"6636-HB1 V1D6026 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-HB1 V1 D6013 1107-13 IBM IBM 15"6636-H61 V1D5836 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 6636-HB1 23MVZ99 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 9205-AB2 VLA8525 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 9205-AB6 V6-MF714 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 9205-AB6 V6MG168 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 9205-AB6 V6-MG187 1107-13 IBM IBM 15" 9511-AG4 55-NR547 1107-13 VSONIC VS VG1506 V6CDS21451 1Q11310020 1107-13 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCVX6CP R0000697 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBMFV R0000686 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCBY2WH R0000700 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBY2WT R0000691 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBG99KZ R0000621 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1U KCBT3NY R0000683 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KLX4945 R0002954 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCKT3BT R0000825 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBZ5DF R0000693 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBZ5F6 R0000695 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1U KCBM4FY R0000618 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBZ5FT R0000622 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCKV3YP R0000824 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1U KCBZ5DL R0000698 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCBZ5FV R0000690 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1 U KCBZ5FP R0000685 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBM6FA R0000684 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBT9LB R0000688 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCBG9LG R0000623 1107-14 P73 Page 14 ~~~~~ IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBZ5FR RC000689 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCBZSFH RC000625 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBZ5DG RC000687 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1 U KCBG9L6 RC000627 1107-14 IBM IBM M50 8159-E1 U KCBZSFF RC000694 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCKT2NG RC000819 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBHBPV RC000619 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCFROYG RC000815 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCBV2FG RC000820 1107-14 IBM IBM M508159-E1U KCKV2DR RC000821 1107-14 IBM IBMM508159-E1U KCKT2N6 RC000818 1107-14 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-H61 V1D6016 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-H61 V11 D6568 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-HB1 V1 D3156 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-HB1 V1 D5829 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-AB1 23Y6535 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-AB1 23YB519 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-AB1 23YB515 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-AB1 23YB456 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-A61 23YB535 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 9511-AG4 55-N3761 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-AB1 23DBV07 1107-15 H.P. MONITOR 15" D5063 TW14161404A 1107-15 Vsonic Monitor 15"VLCD521457-2 101110954 1107-15 IBM MONITOR 15" 6636-HB1 23MVZ69 1107-15 1107-15 CMPO EVO D510 W24L63ZA018 RC002926 1107-16 H.P VECTRA US1403000 RC002387 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL420 US15005710 RC002487 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL420 US1402949 RC002462 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL420 US14903012 RC002441 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL420 US14903003 RC002444 1107-16 P74 Page 15 ~~~ H.P VECTRA VL420 US14902936 R0002401 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL800 US12205933 R0002215 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL800 US15101574 R0002419 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL800 US15101560 R0002420 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL800 US15101570 R0002420 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VL800 US11555036 R0002193 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US93211659 R0001321 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US9000499 R0000103 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US14903022 R0002400 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US3211603 R0001043 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US12400940 R0002224 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLIB US14903815 R0002360 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLI8 US14902091 R0002411 1107-16 H.P VECTRA VLI8 US15005718 R0002413 1107-16 H.P. MONITOR 17" CN10532865 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR75215592 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 17" MX0421945 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR81862111 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 17" CN10532819 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 17" KR72470286 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 15" CN210A0477 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW13966286 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR 15" TW10621977 1107-17 H.P. MONITORI5' TW14161363 1107-17 H.P. MONITORI5' TW12240190 1107-17 H.P. MONITORIS' CN217B5980 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR15' CN222B4704 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR15' TW13761338 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR15' CN222B4704 1107-17 H.P. MONITORIS' TW14260019 1107-17 H.P. MONITOR15' TW10623066 1107-17 H.P. MONITORI5' TW11720587 1107-17 P75 Page 16 Surphis Stasf report AAaroh 5, 2008 H.P. 1220C Printer SG07A13120 1107-17 H.P. 1120C PRINTER SG8981320Y 1107-17 H.P. CRT 17" KR74846996 1107-18 H.P. FAX MY9B4E10KX 1107-18 H.P. LASERJET 4050TN USQA019655 1107-18 H.P. CRT 17" MX91872830 1107-18 H.P. CRT 17" MY02574375 1107-18 H.P. SCANNER 4882A197 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14902984 002391 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VL420 US14903812 002380 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLIB US94469761 002040 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94214602 001308 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US9320894 001272 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US94105302 001243 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US93303675 001236 1107-18 H.P. VECTRA VLI8 US93209003 001245 1107-18 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78X5188 002319 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 23FW360 002209 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 23FW402 002217 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 23FV591 002234 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78KX010 002281 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78MY573 002734 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78X5209 002323 1207-19 IBM Netfnit 6000R 23A0230 LaserFiche 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 350 23F1142 002221 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78GR864 002526 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78KZ004 002525 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78MY647 002886 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78X5203 002320 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 350 23F1179 002222 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78X5238 002322 1207-19 IBM eServer xSeries 330 78X5189 002321 1207-19 P76 Page 17 Sinphrs Sfa6f report March $2008 IBM eServer xSeries 100 7827147 002527 1207-19 H.P. Vectra VLiB US03114606 000942 1207-20 H.P. Vectra VL420 US14903016 002440 1207-20 E son FX-1050 Printer OOD1014671 1207-20 H.P. 1120C Printer SG83L130C8 000185 1207-20 H.P. 1120C Printer SG84G130W4 1207-20 H.P. 15" LCD Monitor TW 14162233 1207-20 H.P. 15" LCD Monitor CNC4240GCP 1207-20 H.P. 15" LCD Monitor CNC4240GDW 1207-20 H.P. 15" LCD Monitor CNP406FOKP 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V6MG170 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V6MG175 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V6MG176 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V1D6542 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V1D5808 1207-20 IBM 15" L151 LCD Monitor V1D6054 1207-20 VIEW SONIC 15" VG150B LCD 1011310017 1207-20 VIEW SONIC 15" VG150B LCD 1011111099 1207-20 HP 15" LCD Monitor TW14260994 N/A 1207-21 IBM 15" LCD Monitor V1D5837 N/A 1207-21 IBM 15" LCD Monitor V1D6017 N/A 1207-21 HP 21" CRT Monitor JP22466165 N/A 1207-21 IBM 15" LCD Monitor V1D5656 N/A 1207-21 IBM 15" LCD Monitor V1D3209 N/A 1207-21 IBM 15" LCD Monitor V1 D6544 N/A 1207-21 HP 15" LCD Monitor TW14260992 N/A 1207-21 HP 15" LCD Monitor CH21785953 N/A 1207-21 P77 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENP Date: March 5, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community evelopment By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Pla f Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO C.S. LEGACY CONSTRUCTION INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,831,717.25 (PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY), FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT NO. 1120305-5850/1313120-0 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH ETIWANDA PARK aka GARCIA PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION Accept the bid received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $ 1,831,717.25 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency, in the amount of $ 183,171.70, to C.S. Legacy Construction Inc., for the construction of the South Etiwanda aka Garcia Park Improvement Project, to be funded from Park Development Account No.1120305-5650/1313120-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On Tuesday, February 26, 2008, 2 bids were received and opened for the South Etiwanda Park aka Garcia Park Improvement Project (see attached summary). Staff reviewed the lowest bid from C.S. Legacy Construction Inc., and found it to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Thus, staff recommends award of the contract, in the amount of $1,831,717.25. The Garcia Park site is located at 13150 Garcia Drive, in the Pacific Communities Development. Park improvements will include the construction of an unlighted ball field, with a soccer overlay; a full basketball court; an exercise course; a large play area/tot lot; a restroom facility; picnicking amenities with tables and barbecues; on site parking for 45 cars, as well as, landscape and irrigation improvements. submitted, City Manager/Community Development Attachments GARCIA PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 26-Feb-06 # Description Quantity Unit Eng. Estimate Unit Price Price _ C.S. Legacy , Unit Price Price Braughton Const. - Unit Price Price 1. Sawcut and remove ex. curb & utter 100 LF $ 2.00 $ 200.00 ¢ $ 8.36 $ 836.00 $ 23.64 $ 2,364.00 ~~ 2. Sawcut and remove ex. AC vin 450 SF 1.50 675.00 - 0.82 369.00 2.63 1,182.00 3. Storm Water Miti anon Pollution Prevention 8 SW PPP 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 , 5,249.00 5,249.00 8,737.01 8,737.01 ' 4. Construct 6' hi h tem ra chainlink fencin & ale 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,844.00 1,844.00 5,319.00 5,319.00 5. Excavated and com acted backfill 8,000 CVS 10.00 80,000.00 ~ ' 2.19 17,520.00 16.59 132,687.77 , 6. Excavation & ez d of unsuitable on-site soil & debris 2,400 CYS 35.00 84,000.00 ' 12.48 29,952.00 12.50 30,005.91 7. 24x24 catch basin 17 FA 1,200.00 20,400.00 ~ 893.00 15,181.00 1,147.24 19,503.08 8. 24' RCP 1350 D Load 740 LF fi5.00 48,100.00 .. 82.55 61,087.00 104.62 77,421.00 9. 18" PVC drain line 630 LF 45.00 28,350.00 ¢ 72.00 45,3fi0.00 97.56 61,462.80 10. 4" pertorated drain line with wm 276 LF 20.00 5,520.00 ¢ 14.00 3,864.00 ~ 31.05 8,569.80 11. Manhole per Cit standard Ian #318 1 EA 9,000.00 9,000.00 ~ 2,554.00 2,554.00 7,683.00 7,683.00 12. Concrete wllar er Cit standard Ian#329 4 EA 500.00 2,000.00 298.00 1,192.00 1,004.70 4,018.80 13. Junction Structure er Cit standard Ian #331 9 EA 3,500.00 31,500.00 1,070.00 9,630.00 2,744.87 24,703.83 14. 4" VCP sewer line 350 LF 35.00 12,250.00 18.00 6,300.00 54.88 19,207.50 15. 4' sewer line connection to exislin a"sewer 2 EA 500.00 1,000.00 ,. • 1,101.00 2,202.00 3,398.25 6,796.50 16. 1-1/2'PVC domestic water line 1,974 LF 8.00 15,792.00 ~ 6.00 11,844.00 5.63 11,110.80 17, i" reduced ressure backflow device and enGosure 1 EA 850.00 850.00 _ 2,778.00 2,778.00 2,452.65 2,452.65 18. Sanita sewer clean out 2 EA 850.00 1,700.00 251.00 502.00 384.15 768.30 19. 1-1/2" gate valve in round concrete box 4 EA 150.00 600.00 $ 273.00 1,092.00 184.69 738.76 20. 1"water meter er CVW D standards and connection in street t EA 1,500.00 1,500.00 ¢ 5,885.00 5,885.00 4,077.90 4,077.90 21. 3" water meter er CVW D standards and connection in street 1 EA 4,500.00 4,500.00 ~ 7,074.00 7,074.00 4,609.80 4,609.80 22. Concrete curb 847 LF 22.00 18,634.00 13.00 11,011.00 14.18 12,013.85 23. Concrete curb8 utter 377 LF 30.00 11,310.00 20.00 7,540.00 18.91 7,129.82 24. 8" thick concrete 23,519 SF 11.00 258,709.00 6.00 141,114.00 7.09 166,796.75 25. 4" thick concrete 16,225 SF 5.50 89,237.50 ¢ 4.00 64,900.00 5.73 93,012.76 26. 4' wide concrete Swale 1,256 LF 35.00 43,960.00 1fi.00 20,096.00 22.93 28,800.61 27. Mow curb concrete header 750 LF 10.00 7,500.00 , 9.00 6,750.00 7.09 5,319.00 28. 3" thick AC avin 310 Tons 85.00 26,350.00 ¢ 98.00 30,380.00 92.96 28,817.16 29. 4" thick Class II a re ale base 346 Tons 60.00 20,760.00. 30.00 10,380.00 32.39 11,205.17 30. Parkin lot stripin includin handice stalls 45 EA 35.00 1,575.00 15.00 675.00 12.29 553.18 31. HC parkin lot si ns 4 LS 200.00 800.00 ¢ 200.00 800.00 276.29 1,105.1fi 32. Handica ram rCit standard Ian#102 1 EA 900.00 900.00 ¢ 1,472.00 1,472.00 1,182.00 1,182.00 33. Handice rams er Detail Q Sheet CD-1 2 EA 500.00 1,000.00 1,472.00 2,944.00 1,182.00 2,364.00 34. 6' hi h mason wall 753 LF 55.00 41,415.00 94.00 70,782.00 256.50 193,147.07 35. Rubber safet surfacin includin a re ate base 5,228 SF 40.00 209,120.00 ¢ 16.00 83,648.00 15.18 79,366.57 36. Pla a uipment 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 112,097.00 112,097.00 112,627.67 112,627.67 37. Bic le racks 2 EA 500.00 1,000.00 ¢ 648.00 1,296.00 1,019.17 2,038.34 38. Benches 5 EA 900.00 4,500.00,. 727.00 3,635.00 ~ 832.68 4,163.38 39. Picnic table 13 EA 1,200.00 15,600.00 ~! 1,781.00 23,153.00 2,200.95 28,612.30 40. BBO rill 9 FA 500.00 4,500.00 _ . 369.00 3,321.00 379.16 3,412.43 41. Trash receptacle 17 EA 500.00 8,500.00 . 678.00 11,526.00 - 701.89 11,932.10 42. Drinkin fountain 4 EA 3,500.00 14,000.00 •,. 5,459.00 21,836.00 4,905.30 19,621.20 V # Description Quantity Unit Eng. Estimate Unit Price Price C.S. Legacy Unit Price Price Braughton Const. Unit Price Price 43. 8' hi h chainlink fencin at baseball feld 220 LF 30.00 6,600.00 ~ 53.00 11,660.00 55.07 12,115.50 44. 6' hi h chainlink fencin at baseball du outs 120 LF 20.00 2,400.00 ~ 50.00 6,000.00 ~ ' 53.19 6,382.80 45. Baseball backsto s 1 LS 12,000.00 12,000.00 . 22,005.00 22,005.00 22,304.34 22,304.34 46. 21' la er bench 2 EA 1,500.00 3,000.00 _ 717.00 1,434.00 1,352.21 2,704.42 47. Bat rack 2 EA 800.00 1,600.00 850.00 1,700.00 - 910.14 1,820.28 48. Home late/bases/ itUers mound 8 EA 120.00 960.00 ~ 449.00 3,592.00 160.90 1,287.20 49. 4" thick infield miz 4,969 SF 4.00 19,876.00 $ 1.00 4,969.00 2.80 13,908.04 50. Basketball coun surfacin and strt ing 5,336 SF 2.50 13,340.00 ~ 1.00 5,336.00 0.11 561.45 51. Basketball court slab, base and sand 5,336 SF 10.00 53,360.00. 6.00 32,01fi.00 . 5.89 31,441.20 52. Basketball backboards 2 EA 1,800.00 3,600.00 2,125.00 4,250.00 2,751.70 5,503.49 53. Removable bollards 3 EA 500.00 1,500.00 687.00 2,061.00. 118.20 354.60 54. Park ID sin 1 LS 8,000.00 8,000.00. ~ 12,955.00 12,955.00 11,820.00 11,820.00 55. Restroom buildin including electrical 1 LS 320,000.00 320,000.00 ~ 165,549.00 165,549.00 178,770.41 178,770.41 56. Trash enclosure 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 8,415.00 8,415.00 16,704.02 16,704.02 57. Icon shade shelter 4 EA 12,000.00 48,000.00. 25,160.00 100,640.00 25,162.42 100,649.68 58. Automatic irrigation system to include main line, lateral line, trenching, fittings, backfill, heads, remote control valves, gate valves, isolation valves, testing 8 adjustment 171,390 SF 1.50 257,085.00 0.70 119,973.00 ~ 0.73 125,920.94 r 59. 3" reduced pressure backflow preventer with enclosure 1 LS 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,866.00 5,866.00 11,940.06 11,940.06 60. Irrigation controller with enclosure (Wall mounp 4 EA 5,500.00 22,000.00 6,285.00 25,140.00 10,139.20 40,556.78 61. Pump with enclosure 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 24,719.00 24,719.00 42,112.30 42,112.30 62. Flow meters 4 EA 500.00 2,000.00 471.00 1,884.00 1,657.76 6,631.02 63. Master control valve 4 EA 1,000.00 4,000.00 253.00 1,012.00 1,160.72 4,642.90 64. Soil preparation and fine grading 165,425 SF 0.35 57,898.75 0.20 33,085.00 0.09 15,642.59 65. 15' BTH palms 8 EA 3,500.00 28,000.00 8,099.00 64,792.00 1,843.92 14,751.36 66. 36" box trees 1 EA 950.00 950.00 1,263.00 1,263.00 827.40 827.40 67. 24" box trees 91 EA 350.00 31,850.00 285.00 25,935.00 255.31 23,233.21 68. 15 gallon trees 50 EA 150.00 7,500.00 257.00 12,850.00 82.74 4,137.00 69. 5 gallon shrubs 468 EA 20.00 9,360.00 13.00 6,084.00 , 21.28 9,957.17 70. lgallon shrubs 1,165 EA 10.00 11,650.00 ' ~ 6.00 6,990.00 5.91 6,885.15 71. Groundcover (flats) 9,224 SF 1.00 9,224.00 i 0.75 6,918.00 0.08 763.57 72. Turf (hydroseed) 147,075 SF 0.10 14,707.50. _ 0.05 7,353.75 0.13 19,122.69 73. 180-day maintenance period 165,425 SF 0.12 19,851.00 0.10 16,542.50 0.06 10,311.86 74. Site electrical work as shown on sheets E7 8 E2 1 LS 125,000.00 125,000.00 128,276.00 128,276.00 120,256.68 120,256.68 75. Removal antl relocation of existing streetlight 1 EA 3,500.00 3,500.00 1,785.00 1,785.00 - 1,087.44 1,087.44 76. Verizon phone services wod< incuding street crossing 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 ~ 7,200.00 7,200.00 24,065.52 24,065.52 77. SCE electrical work incuding street rsossings 1 LS 30,000.00 30,000.00 19,031.00 19,031.00 36,051.00 36,051.00 78. General conditions 1 LS 180,169.58 180,169.58 _ 70,765.00 70,765.00' 15,247.80 15,247.80 TOTALS E 2,596,289.33 E 1,831,717.25 S 2,187,112.60 V STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 G'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Ernest Ruiz, Maintenance Superintendent Streets, Storm Drains & Fleet Subject: ACCEPT BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 TO URBAN GRAFFITI ENTERPRISES, INC., OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA POR CITYWIDE GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001316-5300 ($48,750) AND 2620801-5300 ($26,250) AS APPROVED IN THE FY 07-08 BUDGET WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UPON REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF PRICING AND MUTUAL CONSENT, UP TO A TOTAL OF FOUR YEARS BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 07-08 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $75,000 to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffiti Abatement Services, to be funded from 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and 2620801-5300 ($26,250) as approved in the FY 07-08 budget with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in fiscal year 07-08. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council and Board action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 (see attached Bid Summary). The funding for this project was approved in the FY 07-08 budget for $75,000. Staff has reviewed all bid documents and found Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc. to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Superior Property Services 'submitted the lowest bid; however, withdrew their proposal after further review of the bonding requirements. The project specifications required the contractor to demonstrate their color matching capabilities prior to acceptance of their proposal. Staff has met with Urban Graffiti Enterprises and determined they meet all the qualifications specified. This graffiti contractor will augment our existing in-house graffiti abatement crews and will assist in implementing our new comprehensive graffiti removal program targeting private property. submitted, Manager/Community Development P80 MATER P81 BID SUMMARY CITYWIDE GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES Bidder's Name Total Bid** Superior Pro ert Services, Inc.` $1,010.00 Urban Graffiti Enter rises, Inc. $3,825.00 * Superior Property Services, Inc. apparent low bidder; however, they declined the award due to the bonding requirements of this contract. ** A multiplying factor was used for the comparison of bids. Total maximum contract amount for FY 07-08 is $75,000. P82 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14759 (TRAFFIC SIGNALS), LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILSON AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND THE OTHER AT BANYAN AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14759 (Traffic Signals) were approved by the City Council on November 15, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 640,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 640,800.00 Due to reconstruction of one of the traffic signals, the construction has not been completed. The developer, Pulte Homes Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Mahdi MA:TL' City Manager/Community Development Attachments ,.~.,.~..,,. ,.,,e~, „ -- a --- W-~-..~.~ --° _ i 1 ~_ ~ ~ ® _ ~ ' R• 1 _ 1 S .= 1 i ,d -~ t~ _ - ~ ~°+ c _1 I , ® 1 i i - - ®, -- ~ I 1 < - 1 _ ~, Y I 1 Cr j ~ i 1 I p _ ~: B ~_ _ __ "~~~ _ __ .~ ` 1 1 :~ 1 ~'" IF - - r -- ,c _ ~ a i ~ r ~J - f~ 1 s, ~, 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ R. i m~ ' [ •~ Z , i 1 - - .~ i off' ~ __ nm lVl n` 1 ~ ~A~ 5 ~ ~ tl~~ ~ 4 ~ F~~ ~ { R k\ O 1~ 1 I~ ~ f Y ~~ N ~ o~a~o~ _1r~~f~ P83 P84 - :ate r4~ ~~® The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729-0807 Re: Imp Agreement- Extension Traffic Signals Tract 14759-1 Deaz Sirs, We would request the extension of the Improvement agreement for the signals covered under the agreement. One signal has been completely installed, however the other signal has had to be re-engineered as to its footings, due to constraints uncovered form the gas company high pressure lines. All equipment is ordered and all work should be completed by the end of February 2008. This will allow the city to have the signals finaled as to engineering inspections. If there aze any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, ~~ St v J. Ford Director of Planning and Entitlement North Inland Empire Division 1351 Pomona Road Suite 200 Corona, Ca 92882 951-538-5835 Cell 951-271-5860 Fax 951-271-5800 Office North Inland Empire Division 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200 Corona, California 92882 951-271-5800 Phone 951-271-5860 Fax P85 RESOLUTION NO. D8''©~f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14759 (TRAFFIC SIGNALS) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 5, 2008, by Pulte Homes Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located one at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and the other at Banyan Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road: and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14759 (Traffic Signals); and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. P86 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2002- 00922, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF FAIRWAY VIEW PLACE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY FAIRWAY. BUSINESS CENTER ON MILLIKEN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6th Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Fullmer Construction 1725 S. Grove Avenue Ontario, CA 91761 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Resp cttully submitted, Mahd Aluzri Deput City Manager/Community Development MA:TLV #CR48904 $2,320.00 Attachment P87 sTH 4TH PROJECT SITE STREET z w a 5TH STREET z W Y J J E~ VICINITY MAP t~.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DNISION NORTH II 1"= ITEM: ~, ~~~1.3"-~JD°l~}a TITLE: _ EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00097 LOCATED AT 12645 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2003-00097 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2003-00097, located at 12645 6th Street, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed. Y City Manager/Community Development MA:TLV P88 Attachment(s) P89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DNISION NORTH I I 1 "_ ITEM: DIZC~in~-hn~,g7 TITLE: V~C(IV I'rY ly/~P EXHIBIT: P90 RESOLUTION NO. O $' ~ ~D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00097 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2003-00097 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P91 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16089 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE; EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY DAVID F. DOWDING & JUDY DOWDING, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DANIEL VALDIVIA & KARLA VALDIVIA, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND FABRICIO BADIOLA, A MARRIED MAN RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 16089 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 16089, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue; east of Hermosa Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 6310 Meadow Glen Place, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 286944 $180,000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 280458 $18,000.00 (Bond No.) Mah~i Aluzri Dep ty City Manager/Community Development V Attachment(s) P92 n H A!~'ilB4tD AYIIV(IE llERYQ91 AVE ILtYBf1PR?' AYE x I{~1~]V AID ~ i ~D~q P93 RESOLUTION NO. OS`a y9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16089 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 16089 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P94 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPAR'T'MENT ~~-! )~ I'~R^-~ANCr~Hr-O 1 Date: March 5, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759 (STREET IMPROVEMENTS) LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES The required improvements for Tract 14759 (Street Improvements) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14759 (Street Improvements), located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release Accept: Faithful Performance Bond Maintenance Bond Manager/Community Development # 596SBDN8473 (Bond No.) # 596SBDN8473-M (Bond No.) $601,100.00 MA:TLV $60,110.00 Attachment(s) P95 .~.._,,..,.o. ~,,,.~.,,..,.,.,,.~,. ,.,~,~ , _ ; - __ ~ i _ I ,c~ i .t --ff~ 9 - ~ ~a ® ~ i 1' ~_ __ i ~ ~ .~ ~ - i ~' ~ ~• F 5 3:a ~ ~ i _ ___ a - - - -- --- ~. ~~ _ ~ R - _ f ~ ~ - - r ~ - -- ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ t ~~ ~ ~ - :~ -- ~- - - -- t~Q § ~ _ ~: Z ~j ~ _ '~ .ssom '" A~ ~ ~ ~ nn `A~ p ~ ~ I~~ p A as o ~? N oQOao~ __~~ P96 RESOLUTION NO. D g- Qs~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759 (STREET IMPROVEMENTS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14759 (Street Improvements) have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P97 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-1 LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14759-1 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14759-1, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 08664409 $3,202,200.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 08885632 $320,200.00 (Bond No.) Aluzri r City Manager/Community Development Attachment(s) MA:TLV C[TY OF RANG[ !O CUC~~~1~lONGA 1~NC.;iNFERiNG DIVISION VICIN[T1' h~1AP N [file; P~~e / P99 RESOLUTION NO. O cQj' ~ SI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14759-1 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.ARTAIENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P100 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-2 LOCATED EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14759-2 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14759-2, located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite, 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 08664410 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 08885633 (Bond No.) Mahdi Jp,liJ'zri -" Deputy City Manager/Community Development MA:TL $1,350,000.00 $135,000.00 Attachment(s) P101 ~?~o . ',~"'^,_ C(T1' O~ RANCI f0 CUC:~~\IONGA ~;;>tiA ~' L~-i=~ ~ ENC;INl:ER1NG DIVISION ~. , l~1CINfT1' ~IAP /~ ~ [itlr.; . //' v TiZ 1759-2 P102 RESOLUTION NO. ®g ~ J`~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14759-2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P103 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND BEING HELD IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE BOND AND ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 14759- 2 (RANCHO SUMMIT PARK), LOCATED EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14759-2 (Rancho Summit Park) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and were accepted at the September 5, 2007 City Council Meeting. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a maintenance bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of for Tract 14759-2 (Rancho Summit Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release: Faithful Performance In Lieu Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond fitted, Mahdi A uzri Deputy 'ty Manager/Community Development # 864919S (Bond No.) # 864919-S (Bond No.) $2,045,800.00 $204,580.00 MA:TLV Attachment(s) i J i VICINITY MAP P104 7 dr CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P105 , RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 14759-3 (OLIVE GROVE PARK), LOCATED EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14759-3 (Olive Grove Park) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and were accepted at the February 6, 2008 City Council Meeting. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of for Tract 14759-3 (Olive Grove Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release: Faithful Performance # 864920S (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 864920-S (Bond No.) City Manager/Community Development $2,197,000.00 $219,700.00 MA:TLV ' Attachment(s) ';: ~~ i VICINITY MAP P106 T r * CITY HALT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !r \1 v . ~nti~ C~ 7~ 175 9 3 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P107 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-3 LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14759-3 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14759-3, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200, Corona, CA 92882 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 596SBDN8474 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 596SBDN8474-M (Bond No.) fitted, ~luzri City Manager/Community Development MA:TLV $868,600.00 $86,860.00 Attachment(s) P108 I do~oao4v ~~ r ~r cirv aoA~~ ~84~'/ ®~ RA(~~NI® ~IDCG'~~I®G.1~Q P109 RESOLUTION N0. O S= a.53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14759-3 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer 5~f P110 RANCHO CtJCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN TO WILSON PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-218 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE ACTING CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $112,944.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson project, Contract No. 07-218, as complete, authorize the Acting City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $122,184.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $11,294.40, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract .amount of $112,944.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Acting City Engineer. The Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson project scope of work consisted of construction of community trail PVC fence, concrete header, concrete water bars, miscellaneous grading and placement of decomposed granite, etc. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: - Engineer's Estimate: $200, 000.00 11103035650/ 1607110-0 $148,000.00 - City Council's Approval to Advertise: September 5, 2007 - Publish dates for local paper: September 13, 2007 and September 18, 2007 - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: September 25, 2007 October 17, 2007 - Low Bidder: Pete & Sons Construction, Inc. P111 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson March 5, 2008 Page 2 r Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: $122,184.00 $12,218.40 $112,944.00 (-$9,240.00) (-7.56%) The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of one (1) contract change order (Balancing Statement). The notable change that was significant to the decrease of the Contract in the Balancing Statement is the decrease of 231 linear feet of concrete water. Respectfully submitted, hdi City Manager/Community Development MA:RD:SH/Is Attachment P112 RESOLUTION NO. O S'©S`/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN TO WILSON PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-218, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson project, Contract No. 07-218, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Acting City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Acting City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 113 ARCHIBALD AVE. CObiMUDiITY TRAIL N N.T.S. P114 Staff Report DATE: March 5, 2008 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue - APN:" 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District/amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be conside`fed by Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub area 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006- 00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006- 00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council take final action and uphold the Planning Commission recommendation to approve General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and to certify the Final EIR relative to those applications through adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance. ANALYSIS: Background: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 13, 2008, for these items as part of the development proposal for the Rancho Workforce Housing (RWH) Project. A copy of the staff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P115 DRC2006-00635 AND DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 report and draft minutes is attached for reference. The Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2006-00633 conditioned upon the City Council approval of the associated General Plan and Development District Amendments. No appeal of Development Review DRC2006-00633 was filed within the appeal period, so the application before the City Council pertains to the General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, and certification of the Final EIR. The RWH project is a joint venture between Workforce Homebuilders LLC and National Community Renaissance of California, with funding by the City Redevelopment Agency for the development of a 166-unit multi-family housing complex. The project area encompasses the entire 17 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, and south of the existing single-family residences, which includes the proposed 10.54-acre RWH project, the Whole Enchilada, and a master plan of the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue (the area currently occupied by Shop & Go, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories). The project site is currently within a commercial land use designation that does not permit residential land uses; consequently the General Plan Amendment and zone change request were submitted to allow for development of the proposed RWH project. The General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed Use and the Development District Amendment would change the project zoning from Community Commercial to Mixed Use. General Plan/Development District Amendments: Amending the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed Use and the Development District Map from Community Commercial to Mixed Use would allow for development of the project area in a manner that promotes land use compatibility with existing residential uses to the north of the project area and with the existing and future commercial uses to the east and west of the project area, thereby .promoting future development consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. As part of the amendment request, the applicant was required to master plan the entire 17-acre site to ensure a cohesive development pattern and demonstrate that those parcels not included in the RWH project area remain developable. A master plan of the area currently occupied by Shop & Go, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories was prepared in consideration of the project overall design and as part of the EIR analysis. The master plan provided for general office, commercial, and restaurant uses to discuss environmental impacts; however, the ultimate development of this area could include a single tenant commercial use, multiple commercial uses, or a combination of commercial and residential land uses. As an example, development of the site could include land uses similar to those located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, where a variety of commercial and residential land uses are developed and successfully integrated into a cohesive project by providing commercial uses that are compatible with the adjacent residential uses. Mixed Use District: Within the project boundaries there are several existing land uses that will be affected by the proposed Mixed Use District. The existing Espinoza Tire business and two adjacent residences will be removed; the other existing business operations (The Whole Enchilada, Shop & Go and the attached apartments, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories) will be subject to the following Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) land use regulations, which include: The Whole Enchilada is classified as a "restaurant with incidental serving of beer and wine." This is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P116 DRC2006-00635 AND DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 3 • Shop & Go is classified as a "delicatessen and specialty food store" and is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District; the adjacent apartments are also a permitted land use. Shop & Go and the adjacent apartments are considered legal non-conforming with respect to development standards. These uses will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 - Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. • Twins Club is classified as a "restaurant with entertainment and/or cocktail lounge and bar." This land use is not permitted within the Mixed Use District and will be considered a legal non-conforming land use. This use will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 -Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. • Route 66 Memories is classified as an "antique shop" which is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District. Route 66 Memories is considered legal non-conforming with respect to development standards. This use will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 -Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. FACTS FOR FINDING: 1. The project site is approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with various commercial and residential buildings (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Twins Restaurant, Shop & Go, Route 66 house, and two single-family residences). The General Plan land use designation for the project site is General Commercial and the Development District is Community Commercial; 2. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); the property to the west, across Hermosa Avenue, is designated Commercial/Office Commercial; the property to the east, across Center Avenue, is designated Community Commercial and Industrial Park; and the property to the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is designated Commercial/Office; 3. The project does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; 4. The project does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and 5. The project would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental assessment for the project includes the circulation of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). NOP/Initial Studv: An Initial Study was prepared for the project and based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the project may have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact, and an EIR is required. Areas identified as environmental factors potentially affected are in Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Population/Housing, Noise, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P117 DRC2006-00635 AND DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 4 Transportation/Traffic, Public Services, Recreation, Utilities/Service Systems, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. A NOP for the Draft EIR was distributed fora 30-day public review period from October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007. The objective of distributing the NOP was to solicit public comment to identify and determine the full range and scope of issues of concern so that these issues might be fully examined in the EIR. The RWH Initial Study and its associated reports and studies that were incorporated by reference in the NOP were made available to the public during and after the comment period. Two comment letters were received during the public comment period of the NOP. Comments received regarding the NOP were used to help identify impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project. The NOP, Initial Study, and comment letters were included as an attachment to the Draft EIR. Draft EIR: Based on the potential for impacts of the proposed project, including cumulative impacts, and the comments received, the City determined that an EIR should be prepared to analyze potential impacts of the proposed project with respect to Air Quality, Noise, and Traffic. These three environmental issues are addressed in the EIR. Based on the analysis provided in the Initial Study, all impacts associated with eleven environmental issues were determined to be "Effects Not Found to be Significant" according to §15128 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEOP,) Guidelines and are not further addressed in the EIR. A summary of the issues and why they were not included is discussed in detail in the EIR. A draft EIR was prepared for the project and released for a 45-day public review period from November 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007. A total of 8 letters were received by the City in response to the Draft EIR. Under the Califomia Public Resources Code (§21104(c)) "[a] responsible agency ... shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project that are within an area of expertise of the agency ... [and] those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." The primary objective and purpose of the EIR public review process is to obtain comments on the adequacy of the analysis of environmental impacts, the mitigation measures presented and other analyses contained in the EIR. CEQA requires that the City respond to all significant environmental issues raised (CEQA Guidelines §15088). Comments that do not directly relate to the analysis of the EIR are not given specific responses; however, all comments are included so that the decision-makers may know of the opinions and issues presented. All letters received and a response to comments is provided in the Draft Final EIR. Two comment letters and a petition were received from adjacent residences located north of the RWH project site. These comment letters, the petition, and a response to comments are included in the Draft Final EIR. Generally, these comment letters indicate an opposition to the project, question why the project cannot be built at a different location, claim the project will increase crime, traffic and other problems in their tract, and claim that the project will lower their property values. Draft Final EIR: A Draft Final EIR incorporates by reference the contents of the draft EIR and, in addition, includes the following: the comments received; the City's response to comments; and a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies that commented. The Draft Final EIR also includes a proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) that addresses issues and impacts evaluated in the document. The MMRP includes mitigation measures relating to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise, and traffic and circulation. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00635 AND DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 5 Before approving General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 the City Council must "certify" the Final EIR relative to those applications. According to CEQA Guidelines (§15090), "certification" consists of three separate steps. The agency's decision making body must conclude, first, that the document "has been completed in compliance with CEQA"; second, that the body has reviewed and considered the information within the EIR prior to approving the project; and third, that "the Final EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis." CORRESPONDENCE: No comments were received in response to the proposed public hearing notice; however, various letters, and one petition, were received during the draft EIR public comment period. PUBLIC NOTICE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, ~. James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report Dated February 13, 2008 Exhibit B - Draft Planning Commission Minutes Dated February 13, 2008 Exhibit C - Draft final EIR for the RWH project (Distributed under separate cover) Draft City Council Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 Draft City Council Ordinance recommending approval of Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 P118 P119 Sfiaff Report DATE: February 13, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for consideration. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be forwarded to the City Council for final Action. Continued from January 23, 2008. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00633 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING -The request to develop a 166-unit apartment complex on 10.5 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (the associated General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications propose a Mixed Use District), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and west side of Center Avenue. APN: 1077-601-02, 03, and 04. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-0063, 5Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2006-00636 -The request to remove trees on the property associated with the development of 166 apartments located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Center Avenue. APN: 1077-601-02, 03, and 04. SUMMARY: The proposed project is a joint venture between Workforce Homebuilders LLC and National Community Renaissance of California, with funding by the City Redevelopment Agency for the EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P120 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 2 development of Rancho Workforce Housing (RWH), a 166-unit multi-family housing complex. The project area encompasses the entire 17 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, and south of the existing single-family residences, which includes the proposed 10.54-acre RWH project, the Whole Enchilada, and a master plan of the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue (the area currently occupied by Shop & Go, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories) (see Exhibit A). The project site is currently within a commercial land use designation that does not permit residential land uses; consequently a General Plan Amendment and zone change request was submitted to allow for development of the proposed project. The General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed Use and the Development District Amendment would change the project zoning from Community Commercial to Mixed Use. Final approval of this project will be contingent upon City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment, the Development District Amendment, and certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) as to those applications and upon Planning Commission approval of the Development Review application and certification of the FEIR as to that application. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Zoning and Density: Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) (proposed Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3)). The RWH project area encompasses 10.54 acres and proposes 166 units, a project density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: - North - Single-family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial (restaurant and office) and vacant across Foothill Boulevard; Commercial/Office (CO) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) East - Commercial (restaurant) and industrial uses; Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) and Industrial Park (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 17) West - Commercial (restaurant and convenience store) and vacant; Commercial/Office (CO) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial (proposed Mixed Use) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Office East - General Commercial and Industrial Park West - General Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The RWH project site is located on a relatively flat site, sloping gradually from north to south. Two single-family residences and one business (Espinoza Tire) are currently located within the RWH project boundaries; one of the existing residences will be relocated within the City, and the other residence and the business will be demolished. The majority of the RWH project site is vacant and was recently used for agricultural purposes (the area contains neglected grape vines and an area used seasonally as a strawberry field). Other vegetation consists of small scale shrubs and grasses across the site with some trees near the existing residences that are proposed for removal with the project development. The RWH project surrounds an existing restaurant (The Whole Enchilada) at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue and is adjacent to the existing commercial uses to the west (Shop & Go and the attached apartments, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P121 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 3 E. Development Standards: The Development Code does not establish specific development standards that are applicable to a Mixed Use land use district, but instead establishes that "[e]xisting development standards for each land use category ... shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the Master Plan review process" (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) §17.08.040.A.3). Consequently, in the evaluation of the proposed project, no specific development standards are applicable to establish building setbacks, building to building separations, building height, etc; however, for the purposes of analysis, the applicant utilized development standards that closely follow the Medium Residential District. What this means to the project site is that even though the applicant is proposing to follow development standards applicable to the Medium Residential District, any development standard may be modified during the review of the project Master Plan. The following table provides an analysis of development standards applicable to the RWH project with a comparison of those standards utilized in both the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts. ~• .. .. . +:I' Deve/opment~; ' Medium Resrdenhal,+ ~ Medrum;%Hrgh~ + . RanchgWorMorce'Housrng'" rd •: ' St d * ' r: ~ R de f l I ' _ ' a ' ! , '' ' - , : an a s > : .•. .. esr n ra . .:. .: ..:: .,: , ~ u ~, ..:, ~ Dwelling Unit Size: Two Bedroom 800 s uare feet re ardless of district 887 Three Bedroom 950 s uare feet re ardless of district 1,088 Setbacks: Building = 55 Bldg B = 55, Bldg A = 47 min Major Boulevard Parking = 30 Parking = 55 (FBD" 45' for 1st floor Landscape and Wall = 55 avg, 40 min. Landscape = 55+ avg, 47 min and 50' for 2nd floor Building to building: Between atio & bld 20 20 20 Building to detached ara a 15 15 15 Building to curb at ro'ect ent 20 20 20 Interior Site Boundary (dwelling unit) 25 25 25 (FBD" adjacent to residential 25' Interior Site Boundary (accessory bldg) Adj -Low Residential 15 15 25 Ad' -Other 5 5 5 Height Limitation 35 40 37 FBD" 35', towers 40' Lot Covera a Max % 50% 50% 33.3% Open Space Private 225/150 150/100 225/150 round/u erfloor Common Min 30% 30% 43.6% Usable 35% 35% 50.3% Recreation Area/Facilit Re uired Re uired Provided Landscaping: # of trees/ ross acre 45 50 50 Amenities Re uired Re uired Provided 'All development standards are from RCMC §17.08.040 Development Standards, unless noted Foothill Boulevard District (FBD) §17.32.080 "Bold =Pro osed revision from Medium Residential District develo ment standards PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P122 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 4 F. Density: The Foothill Boulevard District development standards establish the density range for the Mixed Use District by stating "activities consist primarily of a mix of Medium to Medium-High Residential uses" that typically "include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling units per acre" (RCMC §17.32.020.C.3). The Medium Residential District permits a density up to 14 dwelling units per acre, while the Medium-High Residential District permits a density up to 24 dwelling units per acre. The RWH project area encompasses 10.54 acres and proposes 166 units, a proposed density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre, representing a project density 12.5 percent above the Medium Residential District density range, but still well below the allowable maximum density range for the Mixed Use District. The following table provides a density analysis applicable to the RWH project with a comparison of density limits for the Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, and Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Districts. .• '~- ~Dege/opment ,~' ~ °~~,Med~umr . << Medium Hrgh :Foothill ~ s' ' JRancho ~':-,:: ~;~; 1 Standard t Residential ° ~+i +~ Residential + ~ t ~ Boulevard ~.; $ .~Workfo`rce F ;+ ` ~ . , ~ Miiced Use ;,z ~ eHousm Density -Dwelling 8 - 14 14 - 24 20 15.75 Units Per Acre Maximum Units for 147 252 210 166 10.54 acres G. Parking Calculations: The total number of parking spaces provided is based on the residential development parking standards (RCMC §17.12.040.A.2), which establish minimum parking requirements based on the number and type of units rather than utilizing parking requirements contained in the Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions (RCMC §17.40.060), which could allow for a significant reduction in on-site parking. A total of 373 parking spaces will be provided for the project including 232 garage parking spaces, 80 uncovered, and 61 on-site visitor parking spaces. The garages, uncovered parking, and visitor parking spaces are scattered throughout the project site to provide adequate parking opportunities for residents and visitors (see Exhibit B). Utilizing either the general parking requirements contained in the Development Code, or those specifically applicable to Affordable Housing projects, the RWH project provides parking in excess of the applicable Code requirements. Under general parking standards, the project must provide a minimum of 354 parking spaces and 373 spaces are provided, an excess of 19 parking spaces. Under the Affordable Housing Incentives parking standards, the project must provide a minimum of 332 parking spaces and 373 parking spaces are provided, an excess of 41 parking spaces. Parking requirements for the multi-family housing complex project are indicated in the tables below: -. ~ r~r ~ -. a o;i:;Unit Siie . 'r '~~~Parkin '`'Standard'. u . ,.' :.r'Number~of.Umts . ';; :.'Re hired Parkin.,.,S aces = i 2-Bedroom 1.8 S aces Per Unit 100 180 3-Bedroom 2.0 S aces Per Unit 66 132 Visitor 1 er 4 units 166 42 ,, , ,: Total ., 166'.. ~ -:. ~_;°:.,354 •.. _ . ._;r 2-Bedroom: 1.8 off street parking spaces,per unit of which't spaceshall tie-in a~garage.or carport - .- 3-Bedroom: 2 offstreet arkin s aces er unit of wfiich 2 s aces shall be in A era a of ba~ ort PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P123 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 5 •~ ~Un'itSize~,~r ,..Parkin".Standard's ..xr,''Number'ofUmfs,~.,,iy:Re-uir=ed.P..arkih-".S aces=~l. 2-3 Bedrooms 2.0 S aces Per Unit 166 332 Visitor N/A 166 0 ~,i„ '!awit 11 I°°4 a~. li?, i, ~ F, ~T' , ~~,,.'., .. ~166';,;r*;; ~S i ,3 ,~.~.. :-.Fi v,, ..in ,n fir: ;r,• .,~,4 4..TOtaI. ,~ rat.,. ~,_ <,,.a;7 , v ~~ ,u.,.r~ z,. ~ 332„S~"~.,.Lm.,IM;~i 2-3iBedrooms 2.on srte parking spaces per unit inclusl~e of~handtcApped andiguest parkmg ~,i W"" r u_,, ~ ~, ~~ a~ ~ I"~`nr~, i, No?re' uiremerils'for covered'° ark,n s ,. ,i ,n}± . r `, ,, „ ~ ;.... ~ : ~ _k ~ ' ; ar x. , ii ~?? ?h+ "i= =:Pa"rkm " T>'"` e`.~ ~~ , ~ ~i . +~, } ` Re " u+red,Parkin~°S "'acesr, "` ~'' Provideal Parkin"-15 aces'a ~: Covered Gara e 232 232 Uncovered 80 80 Visitor 42 61 Total ~ . ,>; :.;:354 " ~ _'~ i. 373' " .; 1'' H. Landscape Standards: Landscape standards establish a minimum number of trees required per acre and a percentage of trees that must be of a certain box size (RCMC §17.08.040.G). The RWH project proposes the planting of 608 trees within the project boundaries; this number was established based on the project size and the tree replacement requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Although it may appear that the project design utilizes the box size requirements applicable to the Medium-High Residential District, in absolute terms the number of trees provided by RWH far exceeds the minimum percentage planting requirements of both the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts (see Exhibit F). The following table provides a Landscape Standard analysis applicable to the RWH project with a comparison of those requirements for the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts. ..• .. . u~ _ ~Developmenf .z%: „l~ Nled+uin Res+deift+a/x~ K 'r ;Y,r Medium N+ghpgr 4 ~ 7~ rRancho Workforce ~ _;` ,~ Standa~ds ate ~ ir ~ ,, ~ ~~ irl : r i ~ r ~ ~ ? ~ Resident+a/ t 'r ~Flousin ~~ r ;k fi 1 ~ r +~ ' ' ~., t• , , , ,; ~ w,,,.,,~ n.~~ ~ n .a ,.,.. ~ , ~~ {~,„~ t s4 , ! ~n r~a , Landscaping: # of trees/ ross acre 45 50 50 %48-inch box 0% 0 5% 27 5% 30 36-inch box 10% 49 5% 27 5% 30 24-inch box 10% 49 20% 109 20% 122 %15- allon 80% 392 70% 381 70% 426 # trees rovided' 490 544 608 'Includes the number of trees required per acre based on a project size of 10.54 acres, plus a 7-for-1 replacement of trees removed with TRP DRC2D06-00636 ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed RWH multi-family complex is intended to provide workforce affordable housing units in the City; the project proposes 166 units with 131 units (79 percent) held below market rate. The distribution of affordable and market rate units will include 22 units for those families at 35 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), 44 units for those families at 45 percent of the AMI, 65 units for those families at 60 percent of the AMI, 33 market rate units, and 2 units for on-site management. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT p1 p4 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 6 The RWH complex consists of 12 buildings containing a mix of 1, 2, and 3-story structures arranged across the site (see Exhibit B). Dwelling units are distributed so that 1-story units are situated along the north project boundary adjacent to the existing single-family residences, 2-story units are located towards the center of the project site, and 3-story units are located along the southerly boundary of the project adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. The unit mix will include 100 two-bedroom units and 66 three-bedroom units ranging in size from 887 to 1,088 square feet, respectively. A 5,185 square foot 2-story community building, which includes a recreational area and community pool is also proposed and will be located near the center of the project north of the main entrance. On-site recreational amenities are provided including swimming pool, tot-lot, picnic tables and BBQ grilles, and two large (55 feet by 100 feet) lawn areas for open play. B. Density: The project will provide 166 units on 10.54 acres, a proposed density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre, which represents a project density 12.5 percent above the Medium Residential land use designation. Although the RWH project density exceeds the Medium Residential District density standards, the proposed density conforms to the Development Code because under development standards for the Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use District "Multiple Family Residential land uses of up 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements" of the Development Code, is a permitted land use (RCMC §17.32.020.C.3). The RWH conforms to the Foothill Boulevard District because a proposed density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre is within an allowable density range of up to 20 dwelling units per acre. Utilizing the Foothill Boulevard density range, the applicant could have requested 210 units, a density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and a project density 42.85 percent above the Medium Residential District. The proposed project density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre is achieved utilizing the permitted density range of the Development Code, without requiring a Density Bonus Agreement under the Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions. Density Bonus Provisions: Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions are contained in Chapter 17.40 of the Development Code. These provisions allow a density bonus and other development incentives to encourage "the production of housing for very low income, lower income ... households" and to "facilitate the development of affordable housing" within the City (RCMC §17.40.010). The provisions function by allowing a reduction in development standards in exchange for the development of affordable housing units. Based on the number of units provided, and the percentage of those units designated for Low and Very Low Households, the applicant may request a density bonus andlor other development incentive to facilitate the development. Incentives can include reduced building setbacks, reduced open space, increased lot coverage, increased maximum building height, reduced on-site parking standards, reduced minimum building separation requirements, or other site or construction conditions applicable to residential development (RCMC §17.40.040.B.1.a). "A density bonus and three incentives shall be provided to a developer who agrees to construct at least thirty percent of the total units for lower income households, [and] fifteen percent of the total units for very low income households" (RCMC §17.40.030.C.1). Had the proposed project not been located in a proposed Mixed Use District, which allows a modification of development standards during the Master Plan process, the applicant could have requested three incentives and a density bonus to allow for development of the project as proposed, while providing approximately 80 percent of the units for lower income households. C. Development Standard Modification: As previously stated, there are no specific development standards applicable to a Mixed Use District, but instead, the Development Code allows that "[e]xisting development standards for each land use category ... shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P125 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 7 the Master Plan review process" (RCMC §17.08.040.A.3). In designing the project, the applicant attempted to comply with development standards applicable to the Medium Residential District, but because of site constraints, proposes to modify three specific development standards. These standards relate to building setback, maximum building height, and maximum wall height and include the following: A reduction in building setback along Foothill Boulevard (a major boulevard) from 55 feet to 47 feet (RCMC §17.08.040.A.3); this standard is applicable to all residential districts. Additionally, within the Foothill Boulevard District development standards, building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard are 45 feet for the first floor and 50 feet for the second floor (RCMC §17.32.080.C.9.e). In both instances, building setback is measured from the ultimate face of curb. The proposed setback reduction is only applicable td Building A, the 3-story building situated to the east of the Foothill Boulevard driveway and results from installation of the deceleration lane/turn lane into the project. This setback reduction is necessary to facilitate development of the project, will not impact any adjacent residences, and will allow for sufficient area to provide landscaping between the street frontage and Building A. • An increase in the maximum building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (RCMC §17.08.040.C). The 35-foot maximum building height is applicable to the Medium Residential District and not the Medium-High Residential District, which allows a maximum building height of 40 feet. Additionally, the Foothill Boulevard District development standards identify a maximum height of 35 feet and that towers and other architectural features have a maximum height of 40 feet. The proposed building height increase will only be applicable to the four southerly 3-story buildings; the eight remaining 1- and 2-story buildings do not exceed the height limit. Although the proposed building height of 37 feet exceeds the maximum building height of the Medium Residential District, all of the buildings that exceed the 35 foot maximum building height are in an area away from the adjacent residential land uses and thus will not impact adjacent residences to the north. An increase in the maximum wall height from 6 feet to 9.5 feet for a combination retaining and garden wall along the west project boundary (RCMC §17.08.O60.K.2). Walls not exceeding 6 feet in height may be located in a required side yard. Combination retaining and garden wall height is measured from the mid-point of the retaining wall to the top of the garden wall; a combination wall with a 4-foot retaining wall and 4-foot garden wall does not exceed the 6-foot height limitation. Here, the applicant is proposing a combination retaining and garden wall along the west project boundary. The wall design will include a maximum 7-foot high retaining wall and a 6-foot high garden wall, which has a maximum height of 9.5 feet. The proposed wall is located along the west property line, the increased wall height will only be visible from the project site, and the wall is situated adjacent to the garages along the west property line so it will not be visible off-site; the wall height will not impact adjacent residential land uses. D. Parking: On-site parking will be more than adequate for the project; a total of 373 parking spaces, including garages, open tenant parking, and visitor parking spaces are evenly distributed throughout the site. Garages that are designed to be architecturally compatible with the residential structures will be an asset to the complex because they provide additional security for tenant vehicles, the opportunity to screen a large number of parking spaces, and a buffer from the existing PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 8 land uses to the east and west. Neither garages nor covered parking are required for projects that provide affordable housing opportunities; however, by providing garages for tenant parking, the project will benefit both the tenants and the surrounding community by providing safe parking opportunities for complex residents. In addition to providing adequate parking opportunities, the site is within close proximity to existing bus stops along Foothill Boulevard. The closest bus stop is located on Foothill Boulevard adjacent to The Whole Enchilada restaurant. E. Perimeter Fencing: The site will be secured with a 6-foot split face block wall along the north and west project boundaries and adjacent to The Whole Enchilada site. Wrought iron fencing will be provided along both the Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue frontages allowing both pedestrian and vehicle access. Vehicle access will be controlled by motorized access gates at the Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue driveways; the Foothill Boulevard driveway will allow both resident and visitor entry, while the Center Avenue driveway will only allow for resident access. Pedestrian access will be controlled by access gates along the Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue street frontages, identified by decorative trellis structures. Entry monuments will be provided along either side of the Foothill Boulevard driveway and will utilize design elements that include the sign structure, wood trellis, block walls with stone veneer, and signage that includes both project and Route 66 identification. Along the Foothill Boulevard frontage of the site, wrought iron fences will be accented with split face block columns (see Exhibit F). F. Architectural Stvle: The contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style for the project is well designed (see Exhibit E). The building design elements include fully tiled roofs, trimmed out windows and door openings, and walls clad in stucco and accented with faux stone veneer. Staff finds the exterior materials and details to be appropriate and durable. The proposed landscaping palette is complementary to the architecture, with plant materials being well distributed around the site. When completed, the development of the site will result in an attractive multi-family complex that will improve the current visual quality of the area consistent with the quality of new projects under construction in the nearby area. G. Design Review Committee: The project was initially reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Diaz) on May 1, 2007. At that meeting, the Committee identified two general concerns relative to the project Site Plan and architecture. The Site Plan comment directed the applicant to take into consideration the existing land uses adjacent to the project to minimize the potential for both immediate and long term conflict. The architectural comment directed the applicant to revise the architecture to eliminate the boxy appearance of the project design. The applicant revised the project and the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Diaz) reviewed the project on June 19, 2007. The Committee reviewed the revised Site Plan and architectural revisions, recommended a change to one of the proposed colors, and recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. H. Grading and Technical Review Committee: The project was conceptually approved by the Committee on May 1, 2007. Neighborhood Meeting: Two neighborhood meetings were held with the adjacent residents .to discuss the proposed project. The meetings were held on September 29, 2005, (at The Whole Enchilada), and November 14, 2005, (at Central Park). At each meeting, local residents, primarily from the adjacent residential tract to the north, attended and were opposed to the project. The public comments expressed by residents were based on how they felt the proposed project would impact their property values and/or create security issues for their neighborhood. Others raised traffic and environmental concerns about the property such as the loss of open space and why P126 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P127 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 9 affordable housing is proposed at this location. The applicant responded to their questions. A copy of the Neighborhood Meeting reports prepared by the applicant is provided (see Exhibit G). J. Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 17 trees in order to accommodate the development of the site. An Arborist Report was prepared to address all 17 trees and identified 12 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Of those 12 possible Heritage Trees, the Arborist Report recommended removing 7 trees because of their poor condition and preserving 5 trees if they can be incorporated into the landscape design for the project. The applicant proposed the removal of all 17 trees because they conflict with project improvements. To address the proposed tree removal, the applicant is proposing to utilize Development Code landscaping standards applicable to the Medium-High Residential District (RCMC §17.08.040.G.1). This code standard requires that new developments provide 50 trees per acre of which 5 percent must be 48-inch box size, 5 percent must be 36-inch box size, 20 percent must be 24-inch box size, and 70 percent must be 15-gallon size, as well as providing a 1-for-1 tree removal replacement. To address the removal of all trees on site and to conform to development standards, the applicant has proposed the planting of 608 trees of varying sizes, in excess of the 544 trees required by the Development Code tree planting requirement. K. General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635/Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634: Amendment Discussion: Amending the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed Use and the Development District Map from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) would allow for the development of the project area in a manner that promotes land use compatibility with existing residential uses to the north of the project area and with the existing and future commercial uses to the east and west of the project area, thereby promoting future development consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. As part of the amendment request, the applicant was required to master plan the entire 17-acre site to ensure a cohesive development pattern and demonstrate that those parcels not included in the RWH project area remain developable. A master plan of the area currently occupied by Shop S Go, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories was prepared (see Exhibit D); this exhibit was also utilized in the EIR analysis. The master plan provided for general office, commercial, and restaurant uses to discuss environmental impacts; however, the ultimate development of this area could include a single tenant commercial use, multiple commercial uses, or a combination of commercial and residential land uses. As an example, development of the site could include land uses similar to those located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, where a variety of commercial and residential land uses are developed and successfully integrated into a cohesive project by providing commercial uses that are compatible with the adjacent residential uses. Mixed Use District: Within the project boundaries there are several existing land uses that will be affected by the proposed Mixed Use District. The existing Espinoza Tire business and two adjacent residences will be removed, one of these residences is proposed to be relocated within the City limits. The other existing business operations (The Whole Enchilada, Shop & Go and the attached apartments, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories) will be subject to the following Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) land use regulations, which include: • The Whole Enchilada is classified as a "restaurant with incidental serving of beer and wine." This is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P128 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 10 Shop & Go is classified as a "delicatessen and specialty food store" and is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District; the adjacent apartments are also a permitted land use. Shop & Go and the adjacent apartments are considered legal non-conforming with respect to development standards. These uses will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 -Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. Twins Club is dlassified as a "restaurant with entertainment and/or cocktail lounge and bar." This land use is not permitted within the Mixed Use District and will be considered a legal non- conforming land use. This use will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 -Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. Route 66 Memories is classified as an "antique shop" which is a permitted land use within the Mixed Use District. Route 66 Memories is considered legal non-conforming with respect to development standards. This use will be subject to the requirements and limitations of RCMC §17.02.130 -Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. Freouencv of General Plan Amendments: The frequency of amendments to the General Plan is generally limited to four cycles per year, three fixed date and one floating date; however, California Government Code (§65358(c)) exempts affordable housing projects that meet certain criteria from the four-per-year restriction. These criteria require the General Plan amendment to be necessary for a single development of residential units, where at least 25 percent of the units will be held for persons and families of low or moderate income. The proposed General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 is necessary for a single residential development, the associated 166-unit multi- family development, and at least 25 percent of the units are held affordable; here, approximately 80 percent of the units will be held for persons and families of low and moderate income. FACTS FOR FINDING: The project site is approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with various commercial and residential buildings (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Twins Restaurant, Shop 8 Go, Route 66 house, and two single-family residences). The General Plan land use designation for the project site is General Commercial and the Development District is Community Commercial; 2. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); the property to the west, across Hermosa Avenue, is designated Commercial/Office Commercial; the property to the east, across Center Avenue, is designated Community Commercial and Industrial Park; and the property to the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is designated Commercial/Office; 3. The project does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; 4. The project does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and 5. The project would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P129 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 11 L. Environmental Assessment: The environmental assessment for the project includes the circulation of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). NOP/Initial Study: An Initial Study was prepared for the project and based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the project may have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact, and an EIR is required. Areas identified as environmental factors potentially affected are in Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Population/Housing, Noise, Transportation/Traffic, Public Services, Recreation, Utilities/Service Systems, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. A NOP for the draft EIR was distributed fora 30-day public review period from October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007. The objective of distributing the NOP was to solicit public comment to identify and determine the full range and scope of issues of concern so that these issues might be fully examined in the EIR. The RWH Initial Study and its associated reports and studies that were incorporated by reference in the NOP were made available to the public during and after the comment period. Two comment letters were received during the public comment period of the NOP. Comments received regarding the NOP were used to help identify impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project. The NOP, Initial Study, and comment letters were included as an attachment to the Draft EIR. Draft EIR: Based on the potential for impacts of the proposed project, including cumulative impacts, and the comments received, the City determined that an EIR should be prepared to analyze potential impacts of the proposed project with respect to Air Quality, Noise, and Traffic. These three environmental issues are addressed in the EIR. Based on the analysis provided in the Initial Study, all impacts associated with eleven environmental issues were determined to be "Effects Not Found to be Significant" according to §15128 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and are not further addressed in the EIR. A summary of the issues and why they were not included is discussed in detail in the EIR. A draft EIR was prepared for the project and released fora 45-day public review period from November 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007. A total of 8 letters were received by the City in response to the Draft EIR. Under the California Public Resources Code (§21104(c)) "[a] responsible agency ... shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project that are within an area of expertise of the agency ... [and] those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." The primary objective and purpose of the EIR public review process is to obtain comments on the adequacy of the analysis of environmental impacts, the mitigation measures presented and other analyses contained in the EIR. CEQA requires that the City respond to all significant environmental issues raised (CEQA Guidelines § 15088). Comments that do not directly relate to the analysis of the EIR are not given specific responses; however, all comments are included so that the decision-makers may know of the opinions and issues presented. Of the comment letters received, six were from responsible agencies who were addressing activities within an area of their expertise. Letters were received from Southern California Edison, Native American Heritage Commission, Southern California Association of Governments, California Public Utilities Commission, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. These comment letters and a response to comments are included in the Draft Final EIR. Two comment letters and a petition were received from adjacent residences located north of the RWH project site. The letters were received from Mr. Dave Lyman and Ms. Sharon Capella; the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P130 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 12 petition was signed by 57 persons representing 45 different properties. These comment letters and a response to comments are included in the Draft Final EIR. Generally, these comment letters indicate an opposition to the project, question why the project cannot be built at a different location, claim the project will increase crime, traffic and other problems in their tract, and claim that the project will lower their property values. Draft Final EIR: A Draft Final EIR incorporates by reference the contents of the Draft EIR and, in addition, includes the following: the comments received; the City's response to comments; and a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies that commented. The Draft Final EIR also includes a proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (see Exhibit I) that addresses issues and impacts evaluated in the document. The MMRP includes mitigation measures relating to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise, and traffic and circulation. Before approving Development Review DRC2006-00633 the City must "certify" the final EIR. According to CEQA Guidelines (§15090), "certification" consists of three separate steps. The agency's decision making body must conclude, first, that the document "has been completed in compliance with CEQA"; second, that the body has reviewed and considered the information within the EIR prior to approving the project; and third, that "the final EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis." CORRESPONDENCE: No comments were received in response to the proposed public hearing notice; however, eight letters, including one petition, were received during the draft EIR public comment period. PUBLIC NOTICE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the Press Enterprise newspapers, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. A total of 295 notices were mailed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2006-00633, subject to City Council approval of the associated General Plan and Development District Amendments, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636 and certify the Final EIR relative to those applications and forward to the City Council a recommendation of approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 and certification of the Final EIR relative to those applications through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P131 DRC2006-00635, DRC2006-00634, DRC2006-00633, DRC2006-00636 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 13 Respectfully submitted, ~'`'~~ ~~~ I Jame R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Grading Plan Exhibit D - Master Plan Exhibit E - Building Elevations Exhibit F - Landscape Plans Exhibit G - Neighborhood Meeting reports dated October 10, 2005, November 14, 2005 Exhibit H - Initial Study Part I (The Draft Final EIR, which includes the Initial Study will be provided under separate cover) Exhibit I -Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2006-00633 and Part II LOCATION. MAP ~~ ~~ f ~ ~. GPA DRC2006-00635 GPA DRC2006-00634 ® DR DRC2006-00633 0.05 0 0.05 0.7 , AAiles P132 EXHIBIT A ~~ ~~~~''~~ - P133 1 ~ a j _.. p 8' } ~S ~ )j fi} g _ ~ C ~ + cc } ' _ ° ^ ____ ;c: e -" ;: ;,: a. ~ ::: _; P° ° ~ i~IF St p'efg a~ ~° d aag~ A ~ 9 ^ ~~~ S z i _ _ . . ! a ,.. R e g ~ ~ f` iA ~¢ .~'':~ Y'y x ~E ceRC a i ~ ~ ®~ . ~~ o ~ ~ g i §{ g ~° ~~ dd gg ~ ~ ~ s ~s # # ¢}pp}p pp & 3 }p #~ . ~ ~3 ! k~ ~ ~4 4 3 . £€af f$ dd993 6 .' 9i . , . e ' , . _. 1 I AI __... _. ~ '' ..._ _. ti U ~ ~ '~~ ` ', ~--~ ' ~• ~ III ~- ~~ _ ~; .. iv ~ j' _I _. ~ I I i ~- I~ I. _ 4 i. ^ I .~ EXHIBIT B 1 -~ - _ -'- l~C a<3~o~ -- _~_i '.I ~_ _ _.~ -__ _ ii _. ~_ _ ~ ..~ '; :9^iI i .Cs' ; ~`C~'':, 6:@ < Y;.:p ~_k., € t-::'i i x:E:L Q ~+ z .. O x¢ z ~ z .~ ~ w a m O Q `°U~.. ~" °a<z ~ o ~ ~a ~~, ~°~]o ~~ow~ ~~° 4 " c' ~i ~ a ~c~°a x~xu O V ° 3z N Oa x U z ~i g U O~~ WVe a Nan ~a~_ ~- ~~v ~~~`e ~ ~~ VOa Um ~-„~~~~ ~og~~ P134 i Tx 2 -- -' - -- - - I -- ---- ----- - `------ T~ ---~ . r-_---• ~ _ + _ - _ - ______ __~ --_-'. -1 I ~ I a ,I T ~ ~ ~ .~ (- - li Irl ~ ~ ~ ® ~~; _ I '`-, ' I oa o II I e I 1/ 0 0o a I a I I 1 - - v a o d a o II ~ I ee eeeee 'I - xaapp r I 3-.IVr qIW 1 ~ e I VVVV 0D 6 oVV 0D boo V 0 ~ 0000 I~ v II wW~ (Q o II~~~~~~{{~~~jj~~71 '1ri _ __ __ _ o I v ~ t ~ ~~ , ~ f+{I~H HfN+N-H~~~ = o a I eeeeeeee r----~{~-~ - _ _ see eee_ _ ~ I I II Rna o~ep. 000 OQOQ o I 3p I v0000000 ; i I II I I I __ ~ II - ~ II i ~ II I EXISTING RESTAURANT II - a I I 'THE 1VHDlE ENCHIUDA' II I ==-J I II _ vovovvuv v vvau _ ~-~ II "~ al ( c.ns Pnl~ I I ,- i~ II 0 I 1 ' I ii I o I ^I II \ I - I I i .i. II I" II _ _ _ ____________ ~ Ili II o II~ 5 CaM1UYm - IX-~~~'--~-- c-T-JI I FOOIH/LL BL I/D. I ,,I I; r ~ I RESID NTIA IT ~ IMMARY l I I eca : los. I pm-I.v f I}25 d//.c !~ III Vnil-. 2 160 Vnila III .3- 2 Bdm/1 Ba N.S= rp r \ ~` 3- 2 Rdm/2 pa 3.55 i r ~ Ipe mlc oml. - lops R. h a-. R hh I I I I I T .n,., v v z eem - e. „mla . Le - 151 spaaa I ~ l j (ce..,n - e. cy.. - pe I ~ I~ ] eem, - ez emla . z - me span . I I III (COmea - 16a) I IBR ur a . ]5 mee - • c -. a2 Wnl Spevef I to1W RawYap PyFF9 epa[m. 368 ~ Con ~ 'I Pon ~ I Taltl %aNpeO Por4bq Spoce. 3.e _ Con ~ ~ I 11] (a)) - Cpn I~ ti it 9$ gcceeaiply Vnlla a 3S - $ gtteaeLle Garages (1.' . 1p' clear e~ea rr/ 10~ . p'- I Eea) I W 69 Pom Rnl<nl Slelle a 2S - 3 AccvafA I IU II spans I I I .~ Poan deal $IWIa . SS - ] q mA1e I I Ir1II yl Spaces I ~ il I I - I COMM R IA 51T Ol MMARY II I I I pu¢ s 50 k. 'I I; ;~~ T.a. al deeF_ I z-slew alms aeq a zs.opo .,. ~) ~ II sngi. asr Remi o le.opo a.l. I I (II i Rniwrml Pve O 5.000 a.l. P. .F a I I I ''II ~IL . a .~r~am=i 01 to space _ ,roan a $b .1. I II I - I 25.0[0/350 - IGO epacn i I _r_ Cwnmvcy Space - 1 y e pn 350 il. i I '' II 10.000/zb - e/ Wacn ~i i I 1 f I yI Realaurml Span - 1 voce pe I W al Sod r • I %~ I1 P ` ~ - a m- a, tell Reweee Spec - 3I fpocea ielal RpWee $pena - $I] paces fl-e eE kcna p hF ~ I 1 I I e e zx or zu - s R.wbp pnnami. spaces ---------------------------l. -. J_ -I 11 r - _ 1 I I ___ r ,-___F__Y _r I • I r i \ .°ri, ___ _ __- e~_t_,) ~ r , - -~_ I ~ -- .. __ _. i SITE PLAN -ALTERNATIVE 1 scn~c=(so D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 WORRFOHCEIIOMePU1LUER91c„ tC631 CMC CENTER URrvR R A N C H O F A M I L Y A P A R T M E N T S RANCao cucAMUNCa cA Rlrpo PHONE~1909199YB191 r R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A - ~ e2 Attu ~~ f` KTGY.GROUP, ~.~ `~ ii ~~~~ ~,a.,avn.. .,..~ .: W .~ m x = 5a~.o- ~ o_.._.. -- -; ~---- o pp ~.[ Bal i Rl od Dim _ ~ ~ AsSh --~---~ ~' `~/ ~----- Bdrm 3 w ' LlvinB Bdrm I Bdrm 2 w w ~ 11 .: +. wr. am v. ~. (• Fint l--p Pet't o Floor Plan ss ~ w ~-a- = ~\ Q ~Y Plan 3 - 1088 s. f. 1 e.-. 1-. T Dining Lwv~nB ~ Bpr~ I ~ 134crn? Ili 7v+ ~ Livivg ~ Hdrm I ~ Bdrm 2 :rss mea~~ ~~~ First Floor Pisv mss metRawo ~,m t Fint Floor Plev Plan 2X - 887 s. C. ve•. r.r Plan 2 - 887 s. C. Ir•-. r.r WORkiORCE IIOAffPW.OFRT LLC IW31 CIVIC CFNiFA pRIVE RANCxncuc.vaoumLU9mo CONCEPTUAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS Q SINGLE STORY CONDITION ' %IRIE (AH191N-9191 D R C 20 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 NAr1oNAL couuuNlr. N6NA1ssANCC RANCH O WOR KFORCE H O U S I N G A Of CALIIORNIA 9065 NAKN AK. sUliE 100 aa 9nao b vn c aw a ~ N t ' RANCHO C U C A M O N G A A ol v[ j ( e . z CAL [ F O R N[ A NOTE: Each unit provided 160 SF lockabl<storage N decklpatio. NOTE: Each Imit provided 160 SF lockablc storagc in deck/patlo. A-1 KT6Y QlOU't~.'. W m O - 00 ~-H Beth op Dim ~ - _ (] wr 9 _~ Lim Bdrm I gdr~2 .°'.'r: cer. coe.. ®LnR Sccond /Third Dcck Floor Plev q _ 3'-0' '~0' 13'0" '~0" U'-S' ' y O ab Bfl[ ~ q au Dining ~ ' o' ° 0 -t . r . ~ I _I _~ Living Bdrm Bdrm_ 2 _~ E ¢¢ '€ TT ^e.~ .. e.. .o... A a -. 4 -_ a ®., ®~ First ~ v ~a~ Floor Plav - ' S'~0' I 19'0" IS'~S° _ wcar3oact IroMEauunras uc IWII flNt' CENTER MRIVE P.WCIIO CUCNAINGA. G 91n0 PIIUNE 1~1 91n.9191 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE 1. ~6 OE CPLIrCRNIA 9085 HAVEN AYE. SUNS 100 10 RANCHO COCAMUNGA CA 9g3U PHONE: (909) 483-]446 ....~. $111 i -~, ~ ~ .y D-vim 0 er . c Lim Bdrm Bdrm 2 ..+. wag w... = '~ s.a.w ron>,. rm Sccond /Third Dec sv ~~ Floor Plen 3'~0° ~3'-R~ I3'~0' i'-0',, IRg° 35-g" r _ i ~ .°. ~.°.` [ o`p ob I-.~ al E DI-- g _ Q wrr ~` Lim Bdrm 1 Bdrm 2 r - ~ :o+e w+: w: f a - and Pntio First ~ m v.r ! Floor Pim _ ~~ ii S~0' 19'0° IS~S' _ Plan 2X - 887 s. f. Pion 2 - 887 s. f. Ilr-r.o- li4-°r.m CONCEPTUAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS Q 2 & 3 STORY CONDITION D A C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A NOTE: Each unit provided 140 SF lockable storage in decWpatio. NOTE: Each unit provided Id0 SF lockable storage in decWpatio. A-2 KTGY AlOIPI ~:; 1 W V , __ - I~+ ~~ w B - o - 00 ep e - Dining ~ 4 - Bsth ww • 9arm ~ _ ww Living Bdral l Bdrm~ :aw wr. .O1. r. r m Se cond / Thlyd Dcck NOTE: Each unit provided 140 SF lockable storage in deck/patio. e 1~ _ ~ ~ e Bath Dlnin¢ wr O ~ . Harms :::. Lim Hdrm 1 Hdrm 2 r ~I rO+r rwa~a r1•p l9C T ! - ~ } y - ~ - ~ ~~ {I T ~ Flnl ~ ~ 1 X P~ti o Floor Plev ~ 1 j 4 tl u ~ S w~ RO' IY~0' 14'8" 11'4" ' W VRKFUPCE IIUI.RBNLULR4 LLC I W31 CIVIC CINItA UNVF. RANCIb CUCAMONtiA, CA 91110 PIIUNE (9V9)9n-9191 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE k ~ OP CALIV ORNIA 90fi5 HAY£N AYE. SUOE 100 1 IR FANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91)}0 PHONL (909) aB}-i<aa Plan 3 - 1088 s. f. I1•-.r o- CONCEPTUAL UNIT FLOOK PLANS Cu 2 & 3 S-POKY CONDf'fION D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-3 .mr.«.m ,..MA ~\ W W WORKiOftCE HOA4:9VLLUFAS LLC 10531 CIVIC CINIE0. DWVE MNCHO CIICAMtpJVA, G 91110 PNQiL (A~9)989-9191 ROOF PLAN ac lM-r+r PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN W/LAUNDRY QBLDG.L SCg1.E 1/n--I W' CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE I - FLOOR PLANS - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE ,gr OF CALIFORNIA 9065 RAVEN AK. SUILE 100 IP PHONE (909J a8J 3a<a 91130 BUILDINGS J, K & L D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-0 w KTGY (lllCN.Pi. _~ ~\ Il.~ PARTIAL ROOF PLAN W /LA UNURY @ BLDG. L umEare =r+r FIRST FLOOR PLAN srxe. In--rvr 7Y P. FRONT ELEVATION SG11.E: L16ti1'd SIDE ELEVATION SCN£: 116'•1'0 SIDE ELEVATION SCALE'. L16'•I'A' oaxroeca uonrtBwnExs u.c CONCEPTUAL ELEVA'I"IONS - BUILDING "TYPE I IM31 °"` `°"°` °"1°E BUILDINGS J, K, & L aaNEHO cucuauNUA cA 9nw YIIpiE 1959191]-9191 D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 NanaNAC coaul]Nln acNassANCE RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G I; Of CPUFpiNIR 16 Rnncno cvcninoi+ca llulv~no RANCHO C U C A M O N G A PNONE: (909) aB3-2aaa CAL [ F O R N I A MATFUTAI S t Ff:FNn Q r~x er Qi ¢ ... ~i uwl~.e.mr... p u. Cs upl..~i rr..o7 ©~a..~e. Q] w..µ umli-y (~ o:.,al.. r...f~ M G.hh 9O ,e rWJ OO Ob ~mr QI T.OY aC.1s N Y am~JM1Od Q Ibex ('Weu1J~w64o) S91nia. C~u W.! 1©[ or ®SaW Nruv lYF~nJ A-5 KT6Y QfOIPI ~. ®~' ..4. A O WIIRI(FURCE IIUMEBVLLpFAS LLC IWII CIVIL- CFNIER UNVE RANCIIU CUCAMUNUA, CA 91910 f11UNE 1Po919P]-9191 NAiIWIAL COMMUNIiT RENA45ANCE OI CAUfORNIA 9pfi5 NAKN AVE. 5111iE 100 ' 16 RANCHO CVCAMONGA. CA 9030 PNONE: (909) a9.1-}aa< MATFR A SI,Ef.FN9] 1Oc we 4/ Oern Qi MV~W.smid Q ~ Q W+I+.ar.~a~a.. 1~ Q •rrp l...44 O a ®im 9OH vuvJ OO C iw~~ lOi ininau OS ~ -"~Yy.Rv ~~ 1-F nu LrwM1rp ~i fpneeemruy © M" ®frnem~n..0~~n CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE I BUILDING L D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N C A C A L I F O R N I A A-6 KTGY QIOIPt:,'° "O A PARTIAL FRONT ELEVATION W/LAUNDRY (NJ BLDG. L 9v.LE. Vl6-~1'O W/LAUNDRY @ BLDG. L SCALE: YI6'~1'V WORI(FORCE HUMEBVLLDFR$ LLC lu6]I cmc EFNIER oluve RANCf10 CUCAMON(iA G 91)ip PH[TJE' IW19199 a-9191 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE t OF CALIFORNIA 9065 MAKN AVE. SURE 100 RANf,MO CUCAMONGA, CA 91 ]JO PHONE: (909) 983-1«a HOOP PLAN SC'ALE'.12'=1'D TYP. FRONT ELEVATION !:lll6'=I iY CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE II - FLOOR PLAN & ELEVA'T'IONS BUILDING I D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A MATFRIAISIFGFAR9 Qi c n s ~ex.a O3 c sv. O paHaaeanmsnnn Qi c la el O v.~.i.uu.~.aewe © ttaw.slwa O1 u'rwalnLm RUliy eO wa 1~xx Q fa m ~.wm IOo nev. ~ r.. 1©M~ •.vimJJfmrt Pv IQ V°~a• C P+/v~e ts4q•fus•ryil Q xvl. rte. c.~.av Qs~ ©:a...e.......ayna9.a A-7 KTGY GROUP ~. >::_ ..~_ 1 A N FIRST FLOOR PLAN STALE IiH'~1'A TYP. SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: LI6'~I'd TYP. SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: J/16'=1'O SECOND FLOOR PLAN xnLe: Im-wr w0R1(fOXCF. IIV.AffBUI1DFA5 LLC ~ 10531 CIVIC CINIp( CPJ YE !V RNICIIN CUCAMI.WUA, CA 91]wl NAiIONAI COMIAIINIiY RENAISSANCE S. 0( CALIFORNIA 90fi5 HAKN Av[. SV rtE lOV Y I PHONf~(909) <BJ }~aa1 91)30 PA RTIAL FLOOR PLAN W/LAUNDRY @BLD G.H scuE Ir•ro CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE III - FLOOR PLANS BUILDINGS F & H D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-8 KTGY Ca1lOUP3 ~: A W FIRST FLOOR PLAN YN£:IA-•1'd TYP. PRONT ELE VAT70N WOgKENPCE IIVMEBVLLDFPS LLC III CIVIC L'FNIFR DNVE p-wcxo cucuanNC.A. a nvw NICNE 1911919!}9191 NATIONAL C04MUNIIT flENAI55ANCE 4 ~ Of CALIfIXVNIA 9Cfi5 HAKN AK. AlllE 100 16 aNa+[~(swj is ~z9ai 51I.1a CIIIC FI CVATI(l Al CONCEPTUAL BUILDING "1-YPE III - ELEVA-PIONS BUILDINGS F & H D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A MATFNIAIS F6FNIl IO cs.n. a us Q e s. O ly.ly [m1Ym Qi cn.. w Q5 Fl~~m.m Fr o.e © w.sa.. o-m.. Oi u~n9m uma.y (J ~ F~ O f~ cslwa 9w~fineu ~0 Cwnllmv® Q i. Q] u +=rnuN. oa Q lai° .vullq.fs6y1 (~ YH i~cros~t lOf ~ ti ©.wA.e/r~.~a A-9 KTGY G1lIXPI .. i'~""' .. _.~ I -D A SIOE ELF,VATION SCNP:YI6+1'JY woaRroace xoMExuu.oEas uc -~ Itt31 CMC CENIFA PRINE RANCHO CUCAMON4A, CA 9tl10 ' by VHONE 14v919S1-9191 ' NApONAL COMMUNITY flENAI55ANLE .k OF CALIFORNIA 9065 HAVEN AK. SUNF 100 I RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 90J0 PHONE' (909J <83-4<90 CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE III - ELEVATIONS BUILDINGS F & H D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A MATFR Al C 1 F(:FAHi QI ~rtu v.a Qz a r...u Q3 Lpn~LUe iu+a imM Qu U. ~ v~~w. S.I~r.L. o,e © a.4+,,.. m.a. O1 vl..fp l~anaa!'ry © M~auY'~iumim¢ fO v aie..eawvuw.o ©n c.~vws~mevmv Q i~ Q un s.mm.l a.1.~ O Im a. CR.Inulai.y. fm sipl IOI So ~ recwns BW IOS fW ©e.u~a AVaeavl.nµv c'm A-10 KTGY QtC)<F? f^ Y ' PARTIAL FRONT ELEVATION W/LAUNDRY r~i BLDG. H SCALE'. 1/IL-=1'b T YP. SIDE ELE VATION W/LAUNDRY Q BLDG. H SCALE: 1/IL•-I•L• ROOF PLAN SCAI.E.IM'-1'd WVRKFV0.CE HVAffBVRUFAS W.C ~ IW31 CIVIL CFNiFA UNVE ~/ RANCHO CIICM1pN4A U 91110 PHONE <911919P).9191 NAl10NAE COMMUNITY RENAISSGNCE OP CAUf ORNIq 9065 HAKN pVE. SURE 100 RANCHO CUCAMONCA. CA 9q,I0 PHONE: (909) 4Bd-]«0 CONCEPTUAL BUILDING 'CYPL" III - ROOF PLAN BUILDINGS F & H D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 R A N C H O W O R K F O R C E H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-11 KTGY (RtOI.PPJ.: T.:::.:..:..~::.. C.~~ .\ Y ROOF PLAN W/LAUNDRY rQ BLDG.H SCIAEaA~-r.m SECOND FLOOR PLAN x:ALH:In~-ro FIRST FLOOR PLAN SGLE: ln~l.a. WO0.Kfo0.CE tIVAffBNIDfA3 LLC IW31 CINC CINIEA DNVE PNJ[HO CVCMIMJ4A, G 91tW PIIOHE IMN19!}9191 NATIONAL COMNUNILT flENAISSAN<E ,4 OF LALIfCflNIA 9W5 MAVEN AVE. SUITE 100 1 PPNCNO NCAMONGA, CA 91 ),HI PeONL (909) a9J-3a0a CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE IV - FLOOR PLANS BUILDING G D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A CAL [ F O R N I A A-12 KTGY l~lOLP _.. A V WORI:FORCE HOMEb W.OiA3 LLC • IC6E1 C1VIl CINIE0. WUVE .'~ MNCHO CII[pMlING0. CA 91110 PHONE: 156919PJ-9191 NALIONAL COMMHNIiY RENA155ANCE 9065AHIAKN AK. SOME lOO ) PHONE (909) 4BJ 1444 91J30 TYN. SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: VI6'~1'+Y CONCEP'PUAL BUILDING TYPE IV - ELEVATIONS BUILDING G D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A CAL [FORM A MATFRIAIS IFCFNn Q c u x.+ O3 w.m m Q Lvn~snm llve Qcr..w OS Y~~L.aSwnRW Pv © w....u.. v.~~m. Qi v~ad~bm wea Qe w. _ Nv O9 f~i CvMN[im pvirv:'p 10 C io• vse lOl nnw•c © Nw, mJ0.ysM ~P•fnu Lmtrp is bpl O foN~ir C.mugp IOS SuA A-13 KTGY QtOLP Y~t:G A 00 ROOF PLAN SCALE: IA'~1'V woweFOxcE xOllEHUauPU L[d CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE IV - ROOF PLAN ~, IW:1 crnc cwrEa o1HVE B U L L DING G PANCHO CI)CAMONU'A, Cp 91110 ' PHONE 191919e9-9191 D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 "A1.°N AL `°MH°"'." HE"A.5$""<E R A N C H O W O R K F O R C E H O U S I N G OF CALIFORNIA 1 aArvcHO acpuoiu q'cAl9n3° - R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PHONE: (909) a83-2a4< C A L I F O R N[ A A-l4 KTGY GROII'1~.. ..e~,..•.e Y,>,n waaaeuaeR xol.>rew.oeRS u.c I W]I CIVIC CFNIER DRIVE aANCNO CVCARI~]NVA, G 91]10 PHgJE (9U919PJ-9191 NAJIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE or cnuroxwA 9065 HA VfN AVE. SURE 100 IV PxONE~(909) aB3G2 a4 91 RO ROOF PLAN sc'ALE-. Ire-w'm SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE'. IM'~I'A' CONCEY'CUAL BUILDING TYPE V - FLOOR & ROOF PLANS BUILDING E D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO W O R K F O R C E H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-IS KTGY QtOU'I ;;; (.71 O FIRST FLOOR PLAN uALx: 1A--ra- TYP. FRONT ELEVATION scnEE~. ;ns-rm W(10.KiORCE HVAffBVLLOFAS LLf IW31 CIVIC CF1I3£R ANNE PANCHO CUCAMONti0. CA 91l]R PHG`12 1909191119191 NATIONAL COMMVNIiY RENAISSANCE - OE CAL60RNIp _ 9065 HAVEN FYE SUILE 100 i RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91Id0 PHOrvE (909) a93-3a44 MATFRIAIS3F6FN31 Q cm..n. e n=r (~ w ... Q uw L..:~r,.. .p ~ is ®~... ps e ~am.P.~mw. © o-...o.. Qi e.aaumr~ ~ r ®r~ Q v ~.. ..wu Q n. ,. Iz "•d -~-•I~-om I© ~ 1'6CnlolNrp~e.vPl wee a.. ~ s ...~~.••o-•am CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE V - ELEVATIONS BUILDING E D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-16 KT6Y Q!(%Fi.li ("~^ ..~~ CJ7 TYP. SIDE ELEVATION 6C.LLE'. 3116'~I'O SECOND FLOOR PLAN xnu~:: Im-rm FIRST FLOOR PLAN unte:l~~rv wowcE°xce„°,,~ai9LUU~u,c CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE VI - FLOOR PLANS wwcxo ~°xA~°i~ A°wG ,nm BUILDINGS A, B, C, & D m PIroNE: lanl se,-sul D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 """°""` `°"„°""" aENAI$$A"" RANCHO W O R K F O R C E H O U S I N G ~. _~ or uuroawA 90fi5 HAVEN AK. SUITE IOD ( PNplE (909)~:e ci. aA smo RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-17 KTGY Q\OUP mrm~ ~..~. vsa~ "O CJ1 N O ~ ~ Q i V I i -- Q a --- a 4 a ~-- , Q 4 11411 IU.N.O) a ~ a o =i a ~- a 4 b i j __ ~I 1~\ O ;1~\ O ~ nrn 4 i ~ 4 ' I I 1 a 4' ---~ a ; a i o O ~ 4 i 4 ~ o a i a 4~ -- 4 ~ `- i ~ : ~ /~ _ GY i , / ~ %I I O ROOF PLAN xAIE. In'-ra THIRD FLOOR PLAN xn1E~. In••rn• °wtr°ece u°nffuw.°uvs uc CONCEPTUAL BUILDING 'T'YPE VI - FLOOR & ROOF PLANS IIW31 nvlc cE~+rea wuvs k3 U 1 L D (N G S A, B, C, Nc D RANCIIO c'IICnMON4'A. [A vlUn PIIIINE IMi91 9P1-9191 D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 "°"°"""°""°""` reE""'~~""`E RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G k 90fi5°H'A~N'AVE. SURE 100 'ID reANCn° cucAwroNCA, cA snao R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A vHwuE: (s°s) qe.q-lggq C A L I F O R N I A A-18 KTO~Y (~TlOLPga... 'r_~rn "D W TYP. FRONT ELEVATION SNE: YI6~I'V WOANFORCE NOI.RBNLDFAS LLC IMII CIVIC CEMFP DNVE MNCHO CVCAMON4'A G fl)b PH(NlE IMi91 9[]A 191 NP11ON4L COMMUNItt REN4155PNCE A OF GLIFORNIA 9065 MRVEN pK. $V lif 100 I, 10 PpNCHO LUCRMONC0. CA 91)X1 PHONE: (909) a8J-laH MATFRIAI RJ,E4ENp O c.m~ n./ O a .s. Q uw o...o...ar ~' c ('s uwl... r. rru~ Q w..,. m. ~... Di ..aw.m..i.. '0 wL n... o.... ~....... r V.~ ~ M m.l a..eae w~o~ r.w+~.l~..s. r.+-wl Q eN•r...cw a.a lOf u~IM •.r ~erir nyu. •v CONCEPTUAL BUILDING TYPE VI - ELEVATIONS BUILDINGS A, B, C, & D D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-i9 KTCiY GTKJIPI r O'1 TYP. SIDE ELEVATION SCPLE: )l16'~1'L' >s.J- l~pu 4[)_0.J • Refer iP Shee1 A-9 fur fill Floor Area: Laundey Room Elevations 44fi S. F. Second Floor Area: 2164 5 F. wURArOftCE IIUMEBULLOER9 LLC IWII CIVIC CFNIFA rXUVE RANC110 lI1CM111N4'A, CA 91))a PHONE 19n919P).9191 NRrIONgF COMYUNIiT RENAISSANCE t ~ a cqura+NlA 9065 IIAKN AK. yJI1F 100 Y 1 PHONE (909) <RJG N~4 91150 _~ i .-_~_ \ 0 NO[ GI~sS YP'4G PsL4 "w L.u°Jrv - - ~ F FwtNl^a.l Bre`k Raam ~ Ls44z _ _._. _ C :)~ 1 - - Ias-{Yl_1 -- M+r [e92Lfl J® ~ ~i av ~ uv. I a,~~. u'JU~u e u e~~.: ~ a First Floor Area: If 1019 S. F. CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN RECREATION BUILDING-5185 S. F. SCALE: ~' a 1'-0' D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RAN C H O WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-20 KT(~Y QtOU'sm.: r~W ..__ O1 Rear Elevation suL~ N. - r.o• Left Elevation swc : - r.o~ MATFN A G Ff:FUF lO fa~nu iav Oi o v. Ol YN L~~feaelW G O1 IaW~eere snw irim © M1v,en am. Qi vn.W VSU.~ w. nm Q fM .n mw.p Qo c. m.e i..~... It i~ie~uym IOS A •awnn O ",e~•~•n4r•~! by lOi Syn v m~u BLt TOY bun uar ® e.w.......na-W.u CONCEPTUAL ELEVA"PIONS wrv~roa~E II°r~fi~l.°~ «< R E C R E A "I' I O N B U I L ll I N G IW]I CIVIC CENTER MUVE w+cxn cucmnn"un, cn enm SCALE ~• ~ 1'-0• vum+[ 1~~91 9er-oral D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 NA='°NAL `°""°""" HE"A159A"CE RANCHO W O R K F O R C E H ,[ a 9°fiSAHAYEN'AY£. SLHE 100 C PHONE (909) <B.IG 2~Pad 9"'10 RANCHO C U C A M O N G A CALL FORM A O U S I N G Fron[ Elevation sum k: - rn• Right Elevation A-21 KT6Y QlIXF:^' ., a r..• . ~. ... ,. ,... ~_ Ut M'URI:FO0.CE HOMEBUIIDFAS LLC IW31 CIViI CFNIEM1 UPIVE awwo cvcAml]NUA. a n]m PNGNE IA91 96]-9191 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE ` Cf CALIf ORNIA 9065 HAVEN AYE. SUI1E 100 -IC FANCHO N<AMONCA. CA 91]}0 PHpvE (909) <83-N<A CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN RECREA-['ION BUILDING SCALE: t6' I'-0' D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-22 KTC3Y QtCII.PL ~: R" I~ ~~ I.n V woaxraace xm.¢HUUDMCS I.tc ~~ Iu531 CIVIC CENryA DPIVE _ RANCHO CVCFMpNtiq. p 91Ja0 PHONf (91~9J 981-9191 NAiIONAC COMMUNITY flENA155ANCE d1 O( CALIFORNIA 9065 MAVEN qVE. SUITE 100 o- PNONEO(909) 69JG 2a44 91)30 Root Plan Floor Plan Front Elevation MATFRIpIS 1 F~Ijj lO cw.¢ ~ w Qx w .... Qt L~p~lmarmvw ~° Q f~~....m... ~w © d<m~.. Q IvaA~umwa:e ~i o...~a.<v.or~ Q ~. ~. ..~ wel Qo c . us.® QJ.. e. ~z uM...,,~.1 c.q.m O1 Lan4. =nm s 2Yg9 6pa fss COmmPlxk ~I S~ s. ar © SvW •nsvw~NaaO~wap 9' R_} ,~ Typ. Side Elevation Rear Elevation CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS GARAGE BUILDING TYPE I - BLDGS 3,4,5,6,9,11,14,16,18,23,26&28 SCALE: 11X' 1'-U' D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-23 KTGY QtOU' ~. ~~`~ I.T7 Q 1:121U. N.O.) Q a ~ rr rave mrl Roof Plan Floor Plan 1'ronfEleva low n M6TFRIAI S 1 if.FNl) ~ c r+.w Qi p N~.~..®..r O~ ~ ~ ~ a. ©~oe.,~.a... Q o~px.~L.y OI p'° fO ~~w rrreu Qa ne..a u. m T O3 1 ... 10.M~ O 1'w~f-u LnYnYtr6ep1 O ae ~~ «+r m~i © ]i" © [eN.em..,~nry~c'w 8' ~ i Typ. Side Elevation Rear Elevation CONCL'P"1'UA1. FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS axaroxcc non¢sw.ovu uc GARAGE 6 U I L D I N G TYPE 11 - B L D G S I, 2, 7, S, IQ, 13, l4, l7, 19, 24, 25, & 29 imzl ane crxzm move uNCxo cucAmmmA a anw 5 C A L E: ~' - 1'- 0' PIIINE IflN~9AH191 D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 """°'"A` <°""°"'T" "`"A'~~A"<r RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G Of LAUf°RNIA r l enrvao cucnwi~oec ..' ca~snio RANCHO C U C A M O N G A cxove (sos) +e~-lsaa C A L I F O R N I A A-24 KTGY QlOU'' .. ~.1~• -D J Root Plan i i iiiiia FIATFRIAiS 1 Ff.FNII Q c =~= Pr zp am .a. Q I:sln laasu... rmn Q5 NMn~ raven... oo- © °^^°'~ ~ '°"a' ~9 u rte. ~ ~ ... I.a ..oa.v ~o ~ ~a.® r . p .. :ae.wrea a., ©~ 1-RRn uLMnge faJaVp p ...a~_..,.~ O^ ,~....eA...ae-~rvm Floor Plan Front Elevation WUPi(FURfE HUME9VLLpLR3 LLC Iron clvlc cPirtER owvE RANCIIU CUCAMON4A. CA 91]10 PIIONE'. 19I~9)9P]-9191 NpiIONAI COMMUNItY RENAISSANCE F or uuwrewA 9065 HAKN AK. SUIif 100 'fiT RANCHO CUCANONGA. CA 917}0 vHOrvE: (909) ae}_i++a ~. A Typ. Side Elevation Rear Elevation CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN & -ELEVA'T'IONS GARAGE BUILDING TYPE ^I - BLDGS 15,2q&17 SCALE: ~' = 1'-0' D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO W O R K F O R C E H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A A-25 KTGY GRp.Py.:~ O j Q 1:12 (U.N.O.) Q /~ ~ ~ A®IhY hW Roof Plan IIJI Floor Plan Rear Elevation WOPKF08CE NVMEBULLDpI$ LLC 10531 CIVIC CFNRR pNVE PPNCHV CUCAMVN4'T. CA 91f)0 PHR1E. 1a~91 911}9191 NATIONAL COMMVNIIY RENAISSANCC t9 Of CALI{ORNIA 90fi5 HpYEN AY( SUITE 100 Ip RANCHO NCAMONLA CA 91)30 PHONE: (909) aB5-]aa< ~~ATFR p C 1 F(FNO Qr ~n.vr O `®w~° O LM1~.im.f... OS Yp~Y.. RRUn ie .idav funirhe Q R~Mlr.nx.~ O ~IfeY\ir{w 9O ]~' ~r u~i ~O CW vs r. ,. O 1. rw m,.l..e.•r.r.elw Q .w rr ~..e..m © N>Im u.va..9l.y~aa yv_ Typ. Side Elevation CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVAI-IONS GARAGE BUILDING TYPE IV - ACCESSIBLE GARAGE BLDG t2&27 SCALE: ts• ~ I'-0' D R C 2 0 0. 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A CAL [FORM A A-26 KTGY-GROUPI ~.. ~~ Front Elevation a 4 MpTFRIA C F('FVII Q c u w O n ... Qi I:W I...aio..l... sQ ~a 1... s~..r... o.. © o..a.~..91m. Q n...M`nnav Q oa eNv Qf s~ s.. rc~ Qo i`w vmv Q rn p .1 .A~..~,.R_ 11 law .',.I~.,..F.~1 O..w._.~..m p, ~~. ©~ .....s....w-.. 4:121U.N.0.) Q •a• ¢wve rrrn Roof Platt Floor Plan Front F.leva[inn Rear Elevation WON:FOPCE IIOMEBUII.OFAS LLC 1331 CINI CkMER CPJVE xpNnw attmm~urn, cA 9nw %IONE IU919E1-9191 NPLIQ4Pl [OMMUNItT RENpISSPNCE f ~ OF CALIFORNIA 9065 NpV£N PK'. SUIIC 100 IP RpNCMO CVCAMONCA. U 91 J}0 PHONE: (909) 481-]a44 - ~` -O '~ Typ. Side Elevation CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS GARAGE BUILDING TYPE V - MAINTENANCE BLDG 22 SCALE: R' = 1'-0' D R C 2 0 0 6- 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O A N I A A-27 C~• ..~~ "O t~ N Roof Plan Section Side Elevation WO0.CFURCE IIaM9N WFA5 LLC 103)1 CIVIC IFNI[R UW VL wwaln cvc,wneun, cn 9¢m PIIONE. 1911919P].9191 NATIONAL CONMUNItT RENAISSANCE Q OF GAUL ORNIA 90fi5 IIAYEN AYF. SURE 100 Ib RANCHO CU~AMONGA. CA 91],10 PNQYL ts097 aW-NOR Floor Plan Front Elevation II b Rear Elevation CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS TRASH ENCLOSURE SCALE: I' ~ I'-0" D R C 2 0 0 6 0 0 6 3 3 RANCHO WORKFORCE H O U S I N G RANCHO C U C A M O N G A C A L I F O R N I A ~IATFR AISIF('.FNO OI waitl.~/ ]Q~s. Q clv l~..3`L . ~~ Of `pW [~a1~J P~ © umnm uae Q wisW Mein O ~~`vwi~efnu~ O Y • o uvJ p m ,,...,... p .... M M a.. P.. U I. IQi i ~r~Gnms ryml Q fi~uu ©.tmtlavmwa YNUy~ WJ A-28 KTGY QlIX1P1:~ '1~.~'.'.::... .. ~.~ I 1 (.l~ ! a~ i ff E ~ff! s3 3 ii ~ d f;! ] f 3~ z €~ ~~ I I ~~ ~ i 3 t 6. ~ e ~ i ~~ ~j'~~ t~ ~; ~~~~~ ~ ~Ip~~~ ~ ~ d 8~ a4~~~ §~ ~~;Eiai ~iggtli~! ~ ~e~ i a s ~~$ 9 3 ~ °s®OOOC~~O~d~® EXHIBIT F f ~ 1 f' ~~! ,ib~~ ;+3l~~ppjjf s~~i ~~ e ~y ~~il~iet~~lli~le°aiR4a~ iP7 ~ ~e i f~c a/j3 ~o~ P' 3 9 a ., , 4 Sli ~~ E Eg Z ~ d ! 7 7 sl ii rn FF ~" i17 ppR ! e28 sa,~ Sl 8 ~ ~f 1 .s: ~" iii IEEE ~.. ~~~p~ iE6k ~~f s?s~ a~ ~P~~ .c - - ~+:e i to ..:O~u E c t~ f ~ R~; p 1 { - is~W A ~8 F3 YY f i ~ , E i '^' af' °' F1!_°: S?i3~3a1 _.....9 I I 2 ~ F- ~ ~4i~'f' 91 ~ f ,zt II } ~~~~#i~ il,f~ f e '7 t43~1' jsll; ~` 7 ~i~ ~ISI tt~~l~t~~1 ~j117~19i1~'~~ il~~f pt s ~I#FZ:ie?i: i37~77~~E~{ 7~ij.3. ~,i,s I :.gl i 9 of 3, ~~ i e :.d ~~ E f 3 )O®00 OOO O BOO®©®®®®®~~ ~i ~ ,; r 1 dg !fi i t? ffpp 4 1 wlPJ171 If ~ri~~~~~~1. 00 000 00( m 0 R V L' ~e .~ v z o ~- W >~ ~¢ U .'_° F~ Q o O Z J U S .~ i v ~ ~a V c z~ o= VC °°r N 1I ~ -- _ _- ~c I I ~ i 1 ! _ B ~ + C - § ~ B 'I O ~m IO~ _.O~t / ) ~ of 1 1 , i rI i I I ~ -- - O / it , ~ ~ <- o--, r , L_I , D I` , , ~ x ,. i ~~ , : o_ u ~ ;^, ~ , I ~ I yL ~ ~ - i r ~jT~t yo , fi .. ~, L f ] , I ~1~Ig r ~IY6 ~~~ 1 t h ~ ~ 1 ~ E i, ~ ~ _,~ t ~ I~ I III a ~ ~ ~' I I 1 ~.{ } a o ~ I I ' ,j s ~ ~ -- M ;;-- ~r Jr, M ~F - i l LZ , 1 ~ ~~ o ., . _ s ,. _ '. .... a e_. i .. ... ..... -..8. OA L -'---'-' ---'-'-Foothill---''---Blvd. ~-~ ___ Rancho Workforce Housing CONCEP"CUAL HARDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN Rancho Cucamonga, Cali(omia __ -_ ' -.~ EFATllRE LtcErvD. O ° OO "~ . : 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ µ,w °... ~ 1 1 ~~ . 1 ~. ...I..u © r~r...,w. m We- ~~ ~ 1 1 J / Q © L.u_s.nn..) slrr4~e i ~ .\ ~• ~.~ Y I_ J ~ i -) N ~ ~ / I ,~ ~ ] ` --)r I~ ..u ,_.... © F ~ I © ~ru. n.n... u.._nru.. w. r. o . I i -~. ~ ~.. _-.. _~ I s I i~.l LIGNTWG LE~END. •L n• r ...^k.earr_ r..,w.u • / \ K Nlye •PY IIN •/ )v s. ..M1.,N../..., ~, 6 AP NILN PFNMEfER W.1LL FLEV,~TIDN ~...,...r + .~°,.: .:~.. p• a-T-sui4~e.MM1.o_ Shee ,..•..,, i'/ ~1 DRC-2006-00633 ••• 1 n..~Z~ r~,..~.~.~ v:. C9o~ - - FEATURE LEGEND: :! ~ ~' ~. v ~ . m.ve..m. i yt . O .,. 1 0 ~ M ., ~ . ...u ,. ,.~~~ o ~ o ~..w ~,,~. , o ... .,.n.a,~.M,~,Q.~.e~.c,.R~ w~ _:a - -.off - ,t .~ .,,E. e..., .~..,~ I ©~ • .,} - - ~ o ,,,~,, .a~PO.m...K>„M,.~m.,.,. ~ _ ~ .. ...~ p Q i= ; ~., a. ma,o~.K.,..e.a..m~..~.ow~....,.m.n _ ~ __ . ,. m - . ~;! ~_ i W . ~b .. .~..s.~ POOL /RECREATION AREA V V U PICNIC AREA @ LAUNDRY ROOM TOT LOT @ LAUNDRY ROOM Rancho Workforce I-lousing CONCEP'PUALLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENTPLANS Rancho Cucamonga, Cali(omia DRC-2006-00633 n..r1~ Sheet L-3 Y--• 4 ~ ii. ir ..,..~.,,, e ~~ PEDESTRIAN COMIvIUNI I'Y ENTRY PORTAL ELEVATION Rancho Workforce Housing CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE ELL'VA"PIONS 2ancho Cucamonga, Cali(omia DRC-2006-00633 ~~ Sheet L-4 ~: 'L~%~~ ~, ® CIYnF aw-- ~w.~..~ .. . ~:e ~ V ENTRY MONUMENT FRONT ELEVATION ENTRY MONUMENT -SIDE ELEVATION PICNIC STRUCTURE ELEVATION 1 ~ ~ ~ _ ~~~, .,,. I+; 11;~ ,_ ,:,'.. L ~L l.'° V w~ ~. u~p~w~~a..wiq A PICNIC TABLES _.,~ ~~ =~. ~- ,,~~ ~~~ - ~, ~ `4' I n ~ ~ I ~~.? \ .~ ~~ ~~Hn sw. W.~~~ wa ~~.s. rv~n... pj Tor-LOr cncFS z-sl ;+ ~ , .~; ,~,. ~~ ~.'.,:. II:q.F ...,~ A POOL DECK LOUNGE CHAIR i1~1 =. ~~. _ ~~ ~r-~ `5._. „ . ~J_I ,...-.-•.~,,.-u.-..,. ~.--,.-. A~~~,~ BARBECUE v~ _ ~ ~ ``. ~-~~ ~4_ ~, , /_.. Wv~~~r saoem..n .~ua~ ui~aq.stir A TOT-LOT (AGES b-12) {r ...•.u i r~ I~ 4y, ~ 1 h.-1 I _. ~ ~ - .- .__ ~~~ ~. "'y ~~1 5 ;; r Itl i I' ~ '~ ~, ~~~„'II I - 1-XYi l:.l... .. I:~I err i __ C' o~~'v.e..u_ ~ d,,~„ ,r w..~,....r~--.6.u..~ 5 TRASH RECEI'I'ACLE ~~ BIKE RACK I $ i , -"u~~dxw~n~ "~~ I > ~ , ,T I I ~'S Y' LLL F, v0.un DRINKING FOUM'AIN '-_='£ ,~ I ~;~~ ~s.~"ti~i}~ f~ .i ~~°: ti....~; ~.:w„xa f~BENCH W .~ ,,. I- ~, < ,.~ o.~ a.` ~'`m ~. PATIO TABLE SEr LIGHT FIXTURES V en.erv~i Y1 ~.i..~o Rancho Workforce Housing TYPICAL FURNISHINGS Rancho Cucamonga, California DRC-2006-00633 Sheet L-5 ''~e~~ ~. ~ ~.e i+...~..~ C7' ~. Rancho Workforce Housing POO'iHILI. BOULEVARD CONCEP'T'UAL LANDSCAPE ELEVATION Rancho Cucamonga, California DRC-2006-00633 ~r~~ 7~ _ ;. i ~~ ' i. u.. o,~u ~=~~° ° ~ ~ P170 VUORI~'ORCEn HOMEBLT~DERS 1efi21 Civk Curter Drive • limcho Cummongi, CA 9173U Ph: (969J 967-9191. Pea (969) 967.9181 mmvrvocklmeehb.mm Neighborhood Meeting Report October 1D, 2005 Mr. Dan Coleman Acting Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Gucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Foothill B1vd/Center Ave. Community Meeting 9/29/2005 Deaz Mr, Coleman; Worlo`orce Homebu>7ders LLC and Southern California Housing Development Corporation held as initial community meeting from 6PM to 730 PM at the Whole Enchilada restaurant on 5eptembet 29, 2005. The purpose of the meeting was to seek input from the suncunding neighborhood on our proposal to develop approximately 120- 130units of worI~'orce housing on an approximately 6.9 acre mostly vacant site on the northwest comer of Foothill and Center (excluding the restaurant itsal fl. I have attached a copy of the notice that was mailed September 13, 2005. I have also attached a copy of the PowerPoint used in the meeting, the sign-in sheets. The map and mailing list have been delivered to you sepaz¢tely. Our handouts were an eazlier version of the attached ULI publication "Higher-Density Development-Myth and Fact" end a similar publication distributed by HCD, also attached. We generally mailed to about 600 feet as requested by Brad Buller in an earlier meeting with planning stai£. The development team held this 1~ meeting prior to developing any preliminary site pleas in order to give the neighborhood the opportunity to be involved up front in design issues, particularly as they might relate to the northern edge of the site which is adjacent to approximately 8 or 9 homes on the south side of 5ta$'ord. The sign-in sheets indicate 70 individuals end one company. There may have been same additional people who did not sigo in, but not many. We also had Flavio Nunez from the RDA and approximately 10 people from the Worlcforce/SoCal Housing staffs. EXHIBIT G WORI~ORCE HOMEBUII.DERS, I,I,c n ~ Pl ~, The meeting commenced with a presentation by SoCal Housing staff and me desen'hiag our experience in Rancho Cucamonga for the last 12 and 18 years, respectively, The audience contained 4-6 individuals who did their best to loudly disrupt the meeting by interrupting many times during both the formal presentation end the Q&A period and another 4-6 who were mare civil but expressed the same concerns. Their common theme was the following: We don't want subsidized housing there, W e don't want apartments there, We know we need workforce housing, do it down the street Most of the rest of the audience remained si]eat and did not really ask questions. While I tried to elicit comments ar questions regarding site design issues, there was really only ono young man who spoke to the issue. He lived directly "over the fence" from the property and he stated that if it was going to be built, he would hlce to look from his backyard and see same spacing distance, with a walldng path and trees before he sees the buildings. All of the other comments were not really questions but statements along the same lines es the bullets above, It is interesting to note that in the iwo weeks from mailing to meeting I only received one phone call the day after the mailing from a Mr. Jose Nuzasco of 10145 Stafford. Also, at the city council meeting last Wednesday night there were no public cammants at all resulting from the neighborhood meeting of 9/29/05. Please feel free to cotrtact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~/ / ,. D. Anthcny IvTize, President P172 ORKFOlRCE ~ ~ HOIV~BUILDERS 10621 Gvfc C:mty n`ive aand~o Cu®monp, CA 91739 Ph: (909) 937A391 liu:(9~9)997-9181 ww~vvvurhfol¢hh.mm Neighborhood Meeting #2 Report November 21, 2005 Mr. Dan Coleman Acting Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Foothill Blvd/Center Ave. Commuuity Meeting #2-1I/14!2005 Dear Mr. Coleman: WorlcForce Homebui]ders LLC and Southern CalifomiaHousingDevelopment Corporation held their second community meeting from 6PM to 8PM at the GoIdy Lewis Community Center on November 14, 2005. We mailed to the same 600 foot list used for the first meeting. We had 31 sign-ins (see attached list) but probably a little aver 4D people actually in attendance. During the initial portion of the meeting we presented research results on questions raised in our first meeting regarding crime, property values, Section 8 units in Sofa! Housing's Rancho Cucamonga properties and related property management questions. The information presented is included in the attached PowerPoint• We then presented our conceptual site plea and elevation boards, explained that the proposal now included 10.54 acres with 170 units (at 16.1 units per acre) and sought input from the attendees. A number of people continued to express a general opposition to apartments. However, once some ofthe attendees living on Stafford Street saw that we were sensitive to the edge issues and were proposing single story buildings transitioning to two-story before any three-story buildings, we received positive comments from a number of the attendees. One of the initial vocal opponents is now helping to organize a December 6 meeting we are planning to discuss specific edge fence treatment recommendations. We also received a support call on 11/15 from a Teresa Tims who lives at 7968 Center St, on the comer of Center and Stafford. She had to leave the meeting early but intends to write a support letter to the City Council and Planning Conlmissian. WORI~ORCE HOMEBi7ILDER.S, LLC P173 I have attaohed a copy ofthe notice that was mailed October 28, 2005. I have also attached a copy of the PowerPoint used in the meeting and the sign-in sheets. Our handouts were the current version of the attached ULI publication "higher-Density Development-Myth and Fact' end the 5oCa1 Housing Crime-Free/Drug-Free lease addendum, along with the conceptual site plan and elevation boards. Please feel free t6 contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, D. Anthony Mize, President ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key fo move from one line to the next line.) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility o(the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: DRC200(i ' 00(o?iZi Project Title: Rancho Family Apartments Name 8 Address of project owner(s): .Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: WF Fund III, LLC, 8300 Utica Avenue, Suite 173, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Address: D. Anthony Mize, 8300 Utica Avenue Suite 173 Rancho Cucamon a CA 91730 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Lesley Edwards, 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 220, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number.• (909) 291-1400 x 116 P174 Page 1 of 9 Created on 3!9!2006 ~ 1:13 AM EXHIBIT H /~C -Z~i3fa~,' P175 '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Northwest portion of Foothill Boulevard and Center Street 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1077-601-02-0000, 1077-601-03-0000, 1077-601-04-0000 'S) Gross Site Area (arJsq. h.): 10.77 acres / 469,141 sq. ft. '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 10.54 acres / 459.122 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet i(necessary): General Plan Amendment from General Commercial to Mixed -Use. Development District Amendment from Community Commercial to Mixed-Use. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment Lot Consolidation Design Review Approval Tree Removal Permit, Grading Permit, and Building Permit. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The Site consists of three parcels of land. The majori of the site consists of vacant undeveloped land however residential and commercial structures exist along the southerly portions of the property. The site was developed with one single-family residence constructed circa 1970 one sin le-family residence constructed in 1928, associated landscapin and ara es and a concrete block auto repair EnvironmentallnfoFOrm.doc Page 2 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM Information indicated by an asterisk () is not required of nonconstruction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. shop constructed circa 1980. The remainder of the site consists of vacant undeveloped land a portion of which is currently utilized for agriculture. The property is essentially planar, slopin to the south at about a 2 percent rade. Elevations range from approximately 1,220 to 1,205 feet above sea level. Ve elation consists of ornamental trees and shrubs associated with the residential structures and abandoned vineyards and strawberry field in the undeveloped areas. In general, the site is mantled with a thin layer of loose to medium dense brown silty sand to sandy silt underlain by a medium dense to dense silty land. These sands are generally considered non-plastic and non-expansive. (Geotechnical Report #-05-072-11 by RMA GeoScience dated December 19 2005) (Cultural Resources Assessment #W KH0601 by LSA Associates Inc. dated May 5 2006) 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite a!1 sources ofinformation (books, published reports and oral history): The 1928 residence was determined ineligible for listing in the California Register or for designation as a Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark. The records search and archaeological field survey did not identify any cultural resources that will be affected by the proposed development (Cultural Resources Assessment #WKH0601 by LSA Associates Inc. dated May 5 2006) 11 J Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Traffc noise from Foothill Boulevard and Center Street. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description o/the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: See Attached Project Description. EnvironmentallnfoForm.doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 3/9!2006 11:73 AM 76 P177 PROJECT DESCRIPTION WF Fund III, LLC and the Southern California Housing Development Corporation have teamed up with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to develop the subject project. The project is comprised of the development of 166 affordable and market-rate apartments and a community center/recreation building on 10.54 acres. The proposed project fulfills policies of the General Plan, including the promotion of residential infill. Additionally this project is in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency's efforts to create affordable workforce apartments. To accomplish the uses envisioned for this site and in accordance with Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and Chapter 17.40 of Title 17, Section 17.40.040(B)(1)(b) ofthe Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, a General Plan designation change from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) and a Development District designation change from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) are requested. In addition to the change in designation we are requesting a density bonus in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of Title 17, Section 17.40.030(B)(2) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code which allows a maximum allowable bonus of 35% based on the percentage of units affordable to very low income households. Although the project qualifies for considerably higher density, our proposal is only requesting 15.75 dwelling units per acre on the 10.54 acre site. This represents only 1.75 dwelling units per acre above the 14 dwelling unit per acre maximum for medium residential, or a 12.5% bonus. The new project will incorporate three parcels of land at the northwest side of Foothill Boulevard and Center Street. The site is currently improved with two residential structures with associated garages and a tire shop, all of which will be demolished. The project will have 84 two-bedroom and 82 three-bedroom units. One hundred four (104) units (62%) will be rented to ]ow-income families, sixty (60) units (36%) will be rented at market rates, and two units will be occupied by the management personnel. The architecture and landscape design of the project wiH have a TllSCan theme, which is intended to create an Old World style and feel with geometric layout of major features, use of stone veneer with columns and wood arbors, and ornamental ironwork. Our proposal includes the positioning ofone-story structures along the northern boundary of the project site to create a softer transition to the existing single family homes adjacent to the site. The project will consist of 14 one-, two- and three-story residential buildings which will step up in height, with the one-story buildings adjacent to the single-family dwellings to the north and the three-story buildings along Foothill Boulevard, the major transportation comdor. Tile roofs will be used throughout the project. Parking for the project will be accommodated by providing detached garages around the residential buildings and plenty of open pazking spaces. The proposed new development will also include atwo-story community center/recreation building with high-end amenities such as a fitness center, media room, business center, game room, and laundry room. The leasing offices and reception area P178 will also be located in this building. Major landscape elements aze the central pool and spa, outdoor fireplace and barbeque adjacent to the community center/recreation building; large formal central green; individual children's tot lot and play areas; and picnic gazebos with bazbeque facilities. The major vehicular entry to the new development will be on Foothill Boulevard flanked. on both sides with entry monument signs and pedestrian gateways. Additional pedestrian gateways will be set at mid-block locations on both sides of the main entry. Monuments and gateways will acknowledge the connection that the site is located along historic Route 66. The entire site will be fenced with omamenta] iron and stone pilasters. P179 13J Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Surrounding land use includes a restaurant to the southeast industrial offices a gas station oil change and car wash to the east single-story sin le-family residential to the north vacant land and commercial to the west and vacant land and commercial to the south. 14J l~l/ the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The project will remove existing blight in the form of outdated buildings and vacant land which collects trash and replace that blight with new high-quality residential development providin affordable workforce housing for the community. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term moderate levels of noise will be generated from rading and construction activities Hours of construction will be limited to that allowed by City Ordinance No long term noise anticipated from the new apartment complex. '16) /ndicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The project will require the removal of 17 mature trees. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: _None. Site drainage surface flows to eventually reach Cit storm drain system EnvironmentallnfoPorm.doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM P180 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 53,120.00 Peak use (gal/Day) 106.240.00 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 36.750.00 b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) _ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 166 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Mixed-income rental units. 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to Rent (per month) $399.00 to $1.500.00 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Unit Type 'A" : 2 Bedrooms Unit Type 'B' : 2 Bedrooms Unit Type 'C': 3 Bedrooms 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Unit Tvoe 'A': 3 Unit Type'B': 3 persons Unit Type 'C': 5 persons maximum EnvironmentallnfoFOrm.doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM P181 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 48 b. Junior High: 32 c. Senior High 22 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): EnvironmentallnfoFOrm.doc Page 6 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM P182 ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? !f so, please indicate their response. Yes. Adequate services can be provided to this project Fire protection service would be provided by the Ranco Cucamonga Fire Protection District and a fire station is located less than 2 miles from the project site._ The flood control channel is alread constructed and the project is tied in through the City's master planned storm drain system. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not timited fo PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any o/the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. No known history of use storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials on subject property 34) lMl/ the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of al/ such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ////%~.~ Date: 'J_{~ Signature: Title: President, WF Fund III, LLC EnvironmentallnfoFOrm.doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family ApUCondo Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family ApUCondos Commercial/Industrial General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Heavy Industrial Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 600 gallday 400 gal/day 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 2,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/daylac 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gallday/ac P183 EnvironmentallnfoForm.doc Page 8 of 9 Created on 3/9!2006 11:13 AM ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 P184 EnvironmentallnfoFOrm.doc Page 9 of 9 Created on 3/9/2006 11:13 AM P185 j (~i 1t ' ~,~ ~D}.~.- - tl .. o i PI l d p SC~~~k,; 1 .r ~. \ Iwua~- Ma 3PJ f..E~f~{ ~ Q ~ r ~- ~ ~ ~ - avJ~ _ 111 /J ~ ~ `~` 1 if ~~ , l ~~ 111y re~"r[r ~p ~ ~ ~ i f•y\I + .'.; !l J ~~ W ~ is ~}Q L4vI r 'i st 2a•~l+ ^ r i I ~~,t r a },~.wp ~„h4 r ~:~s~ uie ~ ra` j a ~ ,~~~~. ~4'/... ~ `fl^Y 1; 1 ~~'k. s ~ ~11', ~S•' ~ •. ~ o~ e • r + r t ^ _,~~ ~. - ~' ,7, «' r ~ S'.>, ~-c , r 1 - + it , \ll Q F ,,• b t . .~ • I -e , _ k f ~` r ~ 1'' L ~ 4!! Gz ~-+s ~ .: T. e e ~rfoat• F~ t .1,. air ~u -'l ~ ~ I ^.:. _,}. ,• ~ ~ ...-i.^s~.a 1 f~ 1•~,a i.'' p ' 1 c r Ikww- i'r. 's A4 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ap r w i , a .l • ~ .TI -, ssM/ i•: ^ "`aj+ u Ewa ' ~,ay+L`~ yc) t ~1.:1~ ~ a ^7r~ •i s fit: rr~^ia ~=•, « *~'F ~...a: l • ~ jsy~ N ~~ t{ 1~~~ ~ 1.N. •f.1fA' ai ~:3 s c ~. i. }rte ,~ , , ,~f , t y~U» s 1 `~d •i ~~{ 1N Y u s r e ;:~kr~ nlh 4+ 5 a w.v 5,q~,t,„. P If ^ tf~~ eta~ialFl~~fr •. std iw rt rjriy ~ , w"li <~+. z 1 ~•y w" •..e ~• r w z ..rk3Y~ !~ '~ x~ z< f 1 w ~ +'v'{{. rte. ~. • N~ cep ~ ~ ...,s, %efr fi ( k ~~ts,~ ~'{ • 'a. l ~ Mxrft"~ ~ •~ }i ~~'a ~ 'E~ w"+r3 " 'Sv+iES •csat ^ r ) ,C'y sv ` 1 • ~ ~i •.r•.w Ir I: a rn;F 'rl. s x+.Y f ea • Ki i'C•,yk' -F x s si. -.~. cx.,? 4'k. ~r fh' ~ r• • ay "~;' C ''~ ~ •.I M. , ..•r^+ ,ir~^i t~ t« ^ ^ r k,-""=„~,rs k ~ ~} c?aah~ • ~ilii• . t°"S ~~ i'~u.i ~ 'f i~iRi*w ~'' 14w~ 'X,~` m „9 .EI ~~ ~,?k A • • r • .s ~"-'3 i Q r~ ~ ~ ~ asfLlsr ~e , e~ ~ ~.' r ~ r;q wa- . + ~'~_' ~ `n~ . ^ i^~ . ~ wi ia. sp sa nvC" y ,i*~ ~C `r !"y~"' ~s'i2 rGl'~F Yii s%~~} s?~..~~ ~ I.^ ; `. .«'Vv+..ak r v~M ~'~a` z Wis. ~4~ ~-'m,7, °..t s.'. ApJ• ~ ~' Y~' ~°Sy -s' v.a i. - ~ ~ ~x 't<.'.~ .~•.~i~3 '.fir "r~ff's~~~"r }L:-a.._` ~-•~'",'u3 r" • s r 1' ~iis s~ kr~~ -..~ r._.4.e c::i..2'.n ..r:~v.Tx ~.x,. :4.~ % ! E.~' a-t ii N P186 SITE PHOTO KEY MAP RANCHO FAMILY APARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~~~ ®, WORKFORCE _~~,~..n~~~ ~rr,a,.~~„rr, ' ' HOMEBUILDERS IJrvpL tnneN inrMrarlnn e .e~n.Y~~ile/ unurrrve tm..non~.n P187 1. View of site from Center Street facing west. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California i WORKFORCE ~..~:~~~.~.~~., ~~ ;~ HOMEBUILDER.S ~;~,..,~~~~,~~,~o,~,.,~,o~ ,..,. ,.,,~„...,.~~w...... P188 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California WORKFORCE ~~,,,~~,~.a~~o,~a„~~„~9 -, , HOMEBUILDER.S 2. Street view along Center Street facing North. P189 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California i WORKFORCE Soups=m Celiionita Housing ~ '~u' ~ HOMEBUILDERS 1)rre~npm!~m Lnpniaiinn . nrvn r:n~lulr.......x'~~~pmnw 3. Street view along Center Street facing south. P190 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~ . WORKFORCE ., ~~, o„„a~ ~~.,~ a ~,o~,,, ' j' HOMEBUILDER.S ,~,,,.,n,,,~.,.~, ~.,~...,.... 4. View of site from Foothill Boulevard facing north. P191 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California WORKFORCE Sovlhem Gltlarnia Homing ® ~'~ ~'~- HOMEBUILDER.S Devekpm=nl Crnpnni 5. Street view along Foothill Boulevard facing west. P192 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California WORKFORCE ,~~,~. ,~,~,~ .:~, ,- HOMEBUILDER~ Uov Jnnmrm Corry~m:ion .~ dmrl'nqu llr~mixv Lvµrv~nni 6. Street view along Foothill Boulevard facing east. P193 7. View of site from adjacent restaurant facing northwest. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILY APARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California i WORKFORCE ;~~,,~.,~.,,«~~,.~~~,~y .- - HOMEBUILDERS ....,.~,,,,...,.. ~wA.~_. P194 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California '~ ~® WORKFORCE 5~,~~.r,~,:,~„~,„a"~~„~~, DERS ' {' HOMEBUIL 8. View of tire store located on western portion of site. P195 9. View of house located on western portion of site. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California I ~~ , WORKFORCE 5~.,~,,~~„rd~„~.,,~,~~~„~y k;- ~~ HOMEBUILDERS P196 SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ~i~ WORKFORCE viniy.n rn~PO•nlnNiou,m9 -_ .~- HOMEBUILDER.S ~o~•~~iunm« icnq ~,: non 10. View of site from Foothill Boulevard facing northwest. P197 11. mew from site facing east towards officefindustrial warehousing. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California .~° ®,~ WORKFORCE s~,~~,,..a~,,~„a~~~,~~~ ' ~'~ HOMEBUILDERS .1 .~~in/S~i/ll llei iY CrvP~A~ixn P198 12. View of restaurant located adjacent to the southeast of site, at northwest corner of Foothill/Center. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ®. ~ WORKFORCE ~emhem Caidomh Hamnvi ~° ' ' HOMEBUILDERS fix.elopmem cmpnmiicn .~.~...r,,,rv u..,~.. c.a,.,,µ. P199 . ,; t `•~~ ~, 13. View from site facing southwest towards offices. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California i~ SouO~.em:alikmie Ncoemc, Uwehnm~m iwlrcrrainn .1.MOl~a( l/nu ~~f~+nn ins WORKFORCE HOMEBUILDER~S P200 14. View from site facing southeast towards vacant land, and town center with under construction multifamily. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ;~ \` ®, WORKFORCE mnhem CammNa eousmc ' ~a' HOMEBUILDERS ~Grvrinnmrm ! orpmaunn A.lmr-1Y~)il llnminv Gvµnmum P201 15. View of single-family located adjacent to the north. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California i ~' WORKFORCE 5~~,~.,::~.~„~.~:,~,o~:,,,~, ~' ' HOMEBUILDERS ,..,.,,.„.;,~,.,,..~...o.n,.... P202 16. Uew from site facing north towards single-family. SITE PHOTOS RANCHO FAMILYAPARTMENTS Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~~ WORKFORCE 5~,.,r:,_a~„o~,~.~.~~ ~~ HOMEBUILDERS ,. ,.:.~,,,,e..,.: ~~.,..~ Cucamonga Valley Water District Robert A. Deloach General Manager Chief Executive Officer June 12, 2006 P203 10440 Ashford Street • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0638 P.O. BOX 638 • (909) 987-2591 • fax (909) 476-8032 Ms. Lesley Edwards Workforce Homebuilders LLC Southern California Housing Development Corporation 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 220 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Will Serve Letter Rancho Family Apartments Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Ms. Edwards: Enclosed is the requested "Will Serve Letter" for the above referenced project. This District understands that you will forward said letter to the appropriate City offices. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me (909) 987-2591. Sincerely, CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ted Munson Engineering Technician II Enclosure James V. Curatalo. Jr. R. Rnhrrt Neufeld .Iormm~ M wa~,.~ o,,,a,n i.,...... o__~ ~_.~.. T:___ P204 Cucamonga Valley --~--Water District Robert A. DeLoach General Manager Chiei Executive Ofticer June 12, 2006 1044D Ashford Street • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0638 P.O. BOX 636 • (909) 987-2591 • Fax (909) 476-6032 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.O Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service Rancho Family Apartments Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue Gentlemen: You are hereby advised that the proposed Rancho Family Apartment complex is located within the service area of the Cucamonga Valley Water District. We have reviewed the tentative map for the development and have determined that the District has an adequate supply of water available to meet the domestic needs of the development. However, water main improvements may need to be completed to provide minimum fire flow requirements as established by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Following the receipt of appropriate application and hydraulic modeling of the system, arrangements can be made for the installation of facilities required to meet the minimum fire ,flow requirements and furnish public water utility service to the development in •accordance with the District's policies, rules, regulations, and rate ordinances. Also, the District anticipates the existing sewer system. and sewage treatment plant capacity to be adequate for this development. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me (909) 987-2591. Sincerely, CliCAMONGA VALLEI' WATER DISTRICT Ted Munson Engineering Technician II .t,,.,e~ v n,.~~~i.. I. D Gn6nM Alen{nld i,,..,_.. ~~ ~~~:~___ ~__~_„ ,____ ~__~ ,. _.~.. T:-_- P205 Cucamonga Valley ter District Robert A. DeLoach General Manager Chiel Executive Officer .Tune 16, 2006 10440 Ashford Street • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0638 P.O. BOX 636 • (909) 987-2591 • Fax (909) 476-8032 Ms. Lesley Edwards Workforce Homebuilders LLC Southern California Housing Development Corporation 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 220 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Rancho Family Apartments Northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Center St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Ms. Edwards: Pursuant to your request, we are furnishing herewith the results of a flow test conducted on 6/15/06 at 9:45 near the above referenced location. The results of the flow test aze as follows: Fire hydrant #1 flowed: North side of Foothill Blvd. 450' west ojCenter St. Fire hydrant #2 flowed: NWC of Foothill Blvd. and Center St. Pressure gauge for flow: East side of Center St. 375' north ofFoorhill Blvd. Outlet # 1 Outlet # 2 Static Water Pressure: 85 p.s.i. 85 p.s.i. Pitot Reading: 25 p.s.i. 28 p.s.i. Observed Flow: 2148 g.p.m. 2278 g.p.m. Residual Water Pressure: 72 p.s.i. 72 p.s.i. Main Size: 6-inch 8-inch Outlet Size: 4-inch 4 -inch Combined flow at 20 p.s.i. 10542 g.p.m. The normal static operating pressure ranges from 84 psi to 91 psi for this location based on the average water elevations in the reservoirs. The test results above indicate the capability of the water system at the time the test was made. Since the capacity of the water system may vazy as a result of many factors, including changes in demands placed on the system by other users or the static water elevation, we recommend that you give adequate consideration to the information provided, including the normal static operating pressure range, when performing your analysis. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me (909) 483-7440. Sincerely, CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT '` Braden u Senior Engine i_`._..v n...-._i_ i. n n_~_.. u_.a.u ~____.. .. ....~. _. .. _ P206 RESOLUTION NO. OB-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals 1. Rancho Workforce Housing filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 23 and February 13, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories, Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences; the property to the west is designated General Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with existing commercial and residential uses; the property to the east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with an automotive service station and industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated General Commercial and is developed with restaurant, day care, and office uses. c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and ~C ,~ES o °~~/3/ a b` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-04 DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 2 and This Amendment does promote the goats and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and the proposed project master plan complies with current development code standards regulating building setback, building height, parking and landscaping; and b. That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, the proposed project was designed to be sensitive to existing adjacent land uses, and the project Environmental Impact Report was prepared to address and mitigate potential environmental impacts; and c. That the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The Planning Commission makes the following findings under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act: a. Among the applications for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project, the Planning Commission is not the decision-making body for, and is only the advisory body to, the City Council for the General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634. For purposes of making its recommendations onthese applications, the Planning Commission has receiveii and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with the oral and written testimony received thereon during the hearing prior to any action on the Project. Based on that review, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify that the FEIR was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines") and that it adequately addresses the impacts and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-0635, the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Development Review DRC2006-00633, and all otherapprovals necessary to carry out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The Planning Commission further recommends that the City Council find that that the modifications to the FEIR that have been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. b. The Planning Commission finds that based on the FEIR, additional public comments, and the written and oral staff report, and ExhibitA to this Resolution, that the Project will not cause significant environmental impacts except with respect to interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year 2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With respect to all of these P207 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OB-04 DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 3 potentially significant impacted areas and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to less than significant. c. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR, and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific changes and alterations required are contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of the Project as explained in Exhibit A to this Resolution. The Planning Commission finds that the mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant environmental effects of the Project. d. The Planning Commission finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill the basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required no project alternative, the reduced intensity alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative, and the off-site location alternative. For the reasons explained in Exhibit A. the alternatives identified in the FEIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much lesser degree, and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Planning Commission finds that each of the alternatives is determined to be infeasible. e. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program has been completed incompliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission hereby recommends thatthe City Council adopt each of the mitigation measures set forth in the FEIR and incorporate those measures into the Project. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council adopt the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in Appendix F ofthe FEIR and incorporated herein by reference. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval. f. The custodian of records forthe FEIR, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraph 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, in accordance with the attached Draft City Council Resolution including Exhibits A and B and in accordance with the condition listed below: Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its P208 P209 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-04 DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 4 agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY~`~<~cxr.~ JI~ Richard Fletcher Vice Chairman ATTEST: Ja ~s R. Troyer, AICP, ecretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART P210 GENERAL PLAN -EXISTING GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL l 1 LOW RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles i EXHIBIT A-1 P211 GENERAL PLAN -PROPOSED N 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles EXHIBIT A-2 P212 ~ ~ - ~ LA M N M O M N N M LD M N r O r ef r r W N ~ tp u7 er ~ r V M r 7T N 0 ~ 0 ` ~ r W w ~ O h J % d u1 7D O 7r ~ Oi ~ h p ~ 4 ~ N F. d W h - W rn ~f.' LV 7+T to LD V' 7A M W M ~ ID 01 7>D r tD M R N j0 ~~ N 7D N ~ 7A; fi . n ln W O O p1 h h O O Q 7:h M W W Of LO r Qf f0 r M r h M o r (D r pl tD W h ~ y N M M .-- M h ~ ~ m r r M ~ U Q d Hy ~L ~ Cs a ,C R ` ~ ~ C Q. o h ~ W U 2 _ d ~ yr h ~p 'L b ~ s: i y ' z ; ~ O y o ~ N W a ~ ~ ~~ ~ rn I I { I N 1n O ~ p OD I Qf v N N W N O N N I 7D N O O O b fp ~ N pI h r W ` i N r r 11'1 In N Q I i ,,, y O c7, N1 I O) .- C O ~ u7 7p ~ W jt~~ I7niO ' ~h IO I M O ~~ t(7 7>o O r to h N L Q Z ~ Q Z N 01 N M t0 M R ' h Q Z 7q ~7 ~ h O h (O an d ~ ~ O _ h WIC - ~ I~ ~ O h 17 W W h 11 7 117 N I< IV' .-. ~C N~ .- lt) O.~LD r ; t0 r !.- C7 ~~ M ~ ~ a h N 7A I h h C~ I _ r _ r i 10 O C= ~ ~- N _ O a ~ `~ ~ v1 ~n 1` ~ cfl ~ ~ oh In M O orn ['' h. N~ ti7 lrnl.-1n . hl ~ N ' l( ~ LD o p1 D 7n W D 11> h Q Z Q Z ~ M v LD N h OO N r 'Cf Z m M Z o O I 0 O ~ y= ~ U) O N ~ ,:. ~ r 7>7 W O Q1 , ~' O r ; i ~ O H W c7 •- L N 117 ( p1 r T 7D 7T N h 7D r Q r O r r W N r O rn O rn tL ~ h ~ M tD .~ ~ ~~~ O I?.I ~ to to 1~ N ~ N M LD M `Q' ~ h N j r r ~~ N W h i ~~:~ ~IV ~' O h 1n ' W W h ~ N ~ ~ N *- tp I M I N {D et lD Q ..'G. O ~ t~ A.I ~' M K) ~ 17j Q ~ C '. r I ~ r h W m W rn y U w h W M j ~ G 1 I I 1 1 I i I I Z l l i l l l l l i 1 i 10 N rn y m IN O ``' N - ~ W N h LO aril; >A W N Q1 N - -- N O h cp 177rn 7D ~7 0 7A 1~ ~ [O 00 ~ 0 N 00 CD (O rn 7T D W r 1D M ~i N O 7p • N . ;tw,< . ~_.. LD r O rn h ~' h I N r f r M r f~ M of r (p O IT ~7D IO Itp ~ N M r N r V r N Q I ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ,'~ I a l ~ I ~ ~' ¢ LL Lt7 ~ N N N lA ', ~ ~ O N ? M Q ~ i `O N M ~ N D' ~ Q ~ ~ w Q LL Q IL 'i9 iZ p G i [p .. .. ~ ~'Q LL Q '~ ~ Q N N L N :_~ IC i Q d' , ~ ~ ~ N O ~ QLL L 7D LL ~ O LL r ~ ~ I v ~ " I E " ` _ `° '` ~ L °• `° uL, u7 ~ U q ~- Q r ~ , _ I N o _ ~ E a ' E ~ y E c r ?v ,; ~ ~ .. _ r ? 7u ° LL N ° i a ~ h J g O U ~ m _ ~ o o ~ ~ z LL f o o U E o N ~ f9 ~ ~ ° c ~ o U U LJ) " " ~ Lq i 7u lo o E U ~ ;~ ~ c ~ Z m o ~; L ~ U p h O c c o ~ o ~- .~ ~ _ _ H ..1 w. ~ ~ 7U a L .~ o E .~ m N m N ~ ~ ~ c in O m N - . v1 ~ O U .0 ~ ~ E c O v Ln 2 O lC 2 .V ,O7 (r E~ C U N >> C E lO C 7Y t n C O .~ E E t .- Y p ~ O N Q Z O Q N 7 lU X ~ ~ 0 ~= 7U lU a 0 0 ? p N .01 C te t9 L'' ~I LL. UIL C ~ CSI = G U LL U U W = a. Q O N L F~ ai rn C d O 3° N ,.1 1D U `p d ~O ~ n w U tr ~ ma o v ~ v .n ~, m c R a c o-~ d R - t Q y ' 3 LL E E ac g E~~ c ~ 1xa ~ E a E N d c ~y~y E ~ c .-`~~ ~ M C 7 ~ ~ N G O 41 N E ip ~ N U 7 C1 y ~ 70 C 'O O O ~ C = ~ O ~ ,n Z y d = . Vi CO E 7u=" C d d ~ d 3 79 O m oF-Ny L.• y - C T a W N d L ~ ~ 9 O m E ~ E ti O ~n =a~,m .= N C~ N ~ - 7- ~ ~~ as C 7U b 79 t9 N E ~L„ C C ~ O .y IN O N d ~ U mod' ~ d ca c U O p> `1 t9 N o m _~ L ~ - ~ U N •N ` m c7udo o ~ p> ~ m c rn a Q F- p c LL c a ~ N ]~ N ~ ~ d C X o d a .a ~ 7ug 7 C p N~ T ?'d acv, ~Ey~'-o a a~ w ~'~ p o m m c a ~ ~ a'a o 07 d C C O- o~ a ~ y O m ~ ° ~ ay ~ a°'cm~mo o ad ~.m c,f9~ 70 T N N 61 O C a ~ ° U ~ N !6 fU ~ ~ O 7 O rn N d~ p y O C d p1 a l9 l0 C C ~~,~=~L~ °~~~ N' ~ o N N LL to p C > !a ~ N O C ~ ~ t7 C C ~ ~ C y N7v7uy~°'o, o.~'njrnaNi~ ~~ d~ =a ~ N C O C X O U ~ ~ to O ._ ~+ t4 d KN ZOO a2 ~m EXHIBIT B-1 P213 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Page II/-30 The Planning Center P:ICRA-O7.OGIMerch 2002 Final GPIGP LU Master Report for printing. doc OClOher I ~, Z~~I use adjacent arterial highways to move to other portions of the mixed-use development. 8. Exhibit considerable flexibility in design in achieving maximum site potential and sensitivity to adjacent uses. 9. Apply CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles to provide both the reality and perception of public safety. 10. Provide a unique and engaging experience for both residents and visitors, similar to those often found in older cities. Each application of the Mixed-Use designation on the Land Use Plan has a specific intent. Therefore, the guidance for each one is tailored to that area. A land use table is provided for each mixed-use designation to establish the uses to be permitted and the general area to be devoted to each use. Flexibility is provided in the ranges to permit combinations of uses at a variety of overall intensities. Unless otherwise specified, the most intensive combination is the most desirable. The ten areas designated for Mixed-Use development under these provisions of the General Plan are: 1. The Regional Center area, bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, I-15 and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel; 2 A "Town Center" node at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; 3. The north side of.Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Hellman; 4. The western entrance to the City along Foothill Boulevard in the area generally know as Bear Gulch; 5. The Terra Vista Mixed Use Area, located along Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and 6. The Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, generally located west of Milliken Avenue, south of the railroad tracks, north of 4m Street, and east of Utica Avenue 7. The Foothill Boulevard -Cucamonga Channel Area, located at the base of "Red Hill," located near the Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 8. This Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site, on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and the original commercial center. 9. The Haven and Church site, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. 10. The Foothill Boulevard site, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, south of the residences on Stafford Street. EXHIBIT B-2 P214 2.5.3.6 Mixed Use (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The purpose of the Mixed-Use designation in the General Plan is to stimulate and guide development in special opportunity areas where land use change is desired. Mixed Use development may occur in two ways: 1) as a combination of uses in a single development project on a single parcel of land; or 2) as a combination of uses on multiple parcels within a specified district of the City. In either case, the intent is to achieve a complete integration of the uses and their support functions into a common concept. The effect of mixed-use development in the ten opportunity areas in which it is applied is to create special urban places within the general suburban pattern of single uses somewhat isolated from each other. While such a mixture would not be feasible over extensive portions of the City, it can be desirable within limited, focused areas. The expectations commonly required of mixed use developments through site planning, design, and use configuration is that they: 1. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian movement into and within the site. 2. Provide uses that are interconnected rather than being rigidly separated. 3. Include uses that are highly urban in character, with generally higher intensities of use than in surrounding areas. 4. Contain usable public open space that is highly accessible and convenient to residents and visitors. 5. Express a common design theme that may be carried out by architectural styles, landscaping and lighting treatment, street improvements and street furniture, or other means of unifying the development. This does not precluded an eclectic mix of architectural styles; only that the development be tied together in its physical form by some means. 6. Involve a variety of scales and spaces to provide interest and diversity in the environment being created. 7. Include an integrated circulation system of arterial access, internal circulation, parking facilities, pedestrian pathways, bicycle routes, transit stops (where applicable), and related signage. It is intended that movement within the entire opportunity area be feasible on site without being forced to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Page /I1-30 The Planning Center P:ICRA-O7.OGIMarch 2002 Finel GPIGP LU Masfer Report for pnnting.doc October 77 2001 use adjacent arterial highways to move to other portions of the mixed-use development. 8. Exhibit considerable flexibility in design in achieving EXHIBIT B-3 P215 III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY 2.5.5.7 Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7.24-acre site is significant within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. At the southern base of "Red Hill," the site is strategically located near the northwest corner Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Like other newly designated Mixed Use districts, this site presents an opportunity to expand commercial office activity, while providing an opportunity for new multi-family development in the City. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area. TABLE 111.10 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- CUCAMONGA CHANNEL SITE Land Use Mix Percenf Range Grreane Rannn 100% 0 - 7.24 acres ' This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District lSHODI 2.5.5.8 Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site This is a relatively small (3.24 acres), but significant, site within the historic Alta Loma commercial area. Once the location of a large citrus packing house, the site, now vacant, is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and original commercial center. This vacant parcel presents an opportunity to bring new activity into the historic town center either with new commercial office ventures, or with new multiple family developments, possibly aimed to provide housing for our growing senior citizen population. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area: TABLE Ill-11 ALTA LOMA AMETHYST MIXED-USE Land Use Mix % Ran a Acrea a Ran e Medium-High Residential 0%-100% 0-3.24 acres (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres Ci17~ ojRancho Cucamonga Genera! Plan October 17, 2001 EXHIBIT B-4 Page f/I-43 f:V'UNN7NGILarryIGENERAI PLAMFin°! 2003 GP LU M¢sler Rep°Kd°creW-16. d°c P216 2.5.5.9 Haven, and Church Site This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. The site represents a transition area between single family residential to the north and west and industrial/institutional (CVWD Maintenance and Office Facility) to the south and future Office uses across haven to the east. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. TABLE 111-7 2 HAVEN AND CHURCH -FLOOD CONTROL BASIN Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres (B-14 dwelling units per acre)' Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.36 acres This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). 2.S.S.lOFoothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue This 17-acre site is significant within Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. A Master Plan of the site includes a proposed 10.54 acre 166-unit workforce multi-family housing project, an existing restaurant at the northwest corner of Foothill and Center, and a future commercial, office, and restaurant land use at the northeast corner of Hermosa and Foothill. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. TABLE Ill-13 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SITE MIXED USE Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium/Medium High Residential` 0%- 62% 0 -10.54 acres (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre) Commercial -Retail, Office 0% - 100% 0 - 17 acres (commercial and professional) and Restaurant ` This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. P217 RESOLUTION NO. OS-OS A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals. 1. Rancho Workforce Housing filed an application for Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 08-04 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 23 and February 13, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories, Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences; the property to the west is designated General Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with existing commercial and residential uses. The property to the east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with an automotive service station and industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated General Commercial and is developed with a restaurant, day care, and office uses; and ~t` ~ t?~ © c~~J3 ~G1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-05 DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 2 c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The Planning Commission makes the following findings under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act: a. Among the applications for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project, the Planning Commission is not the decision-making body for, and is only the advisory body to, the City Council for the General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634. For purposes of making its recommendations onthese applications, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with the oral and written testimony received thereon during the hearing prior to any action on the Project. Based on that review, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify that the FEIR was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines') and that it adequately addresses the impacts and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-0635, the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Development Review DRC2006-00633, and all other approvals necessary to carry out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The Planning Commission further recommends that the City Council find that that the modifications to the FEIR that have been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. b. The Planning Commission finds that based on the FEIR, additional public comments, and the written and oral staff report, and Exhibit A to this Resolution, that the Project will not cause significant environmental impacts except with respect to interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year 2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With respect to all of these potentially signifcant impacted areas and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation P218 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 08-05 DRC2006-00634-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 3 measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to less than significant c. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR, and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific changes and alterations required are contained in Appendix F of the FEIR which is hereby incorporated by reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F ofthe FEIR, avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of the Project as explained in Exhibit A to this Resolution. The Planning Commission finds thatthe mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant environmental effects of the Project. d. The Planning Commission finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill the basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required no project alternative, the reduced intensity alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative, and the off-site location alternative. For the reasons explained in Exhibit A, the alternatives identified in the FEIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much lesser degree, and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Planning Commission finds that each of the alternatives is determined to be infeasible. e. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt each of the mitigation measures set forth in the FEIR and incorporate those measures into the Project. The Planning Commission also recommends thatthe City Council adopt the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in Appendix F ofthe FEIR and incorporated herein by reference. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval. f. The custodian of records for the FEIR, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraph 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, in accordance with the attached Draft City Council Resolution including Exhibits A and B and in accordance with the condition listed below: Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought againstthe City, its agents, officers, oremployees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, oremployees may be required by a court to pay as a P219 P220 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-OS DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 4 result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Fletcher. Vice Chairman ATTEST: ~! ~i7riJ=~' l Jame$ R. Troyer, AICP, cretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MiJNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART P221 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals. 1. On January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-05, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Draft Ordinance 2. On March 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on March 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories, Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences; the property to the west is designated General Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with existing commercial and residential uses; the property to the east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with an automotive service station and industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated General Commercial and is developed with restaurant, day care, and office uses; and P222 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the Environmental Impact Report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Draft Environmental Impact Report, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Environmental Impact Report. b. The City Council has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report and all comments received and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with CEQA; (ii) that the City Council has reviewed and considered the information within the Environmental Impact Report prior to approving the project; and (iii) that the Final Environmental Impact Report reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council recommends certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d. The custodian of records for the Final Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. P223 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 SECTION 4: The Development Districts Map is hereby amended to change from Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) to Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) for 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibits A and B and in accordance with the condition shown below: Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P224 ZONING MAP - EXISTING Low Residentia Low Residential Industrial Park Low Residential Low Residential Commercial Office Community Commercial Low Medium Residential Industrial Park Community Commercial Commercial Office Low Residential Low Medium Duei.lunfiel PO Mixed Use 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles EXHIBIT A-1 P225 ZONING MAP - PROPOSED m c v v .~ 3 0 J Low Residential Industrial Low Residential Low Residential Park Low Residential Commercial Office Industrial Park Community Commercial Communty Commercial Low Medium Residential Commercial Office Low Residential Low Medium Residential r~ n 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles FO I Maed Use EXHIBIT A-2 rn x x D W 1 L/1 N v N O LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR. MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL MASTER PLAN.APPROVED PUR SUPNT'TO DRC2003-01036 PPRIL 14,.7004 COMMERCIAL $C SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL, CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL RRG REGIONAL.RELATEDCOMM ERCIAL *, MASTER,PLAN APPROVED PURSUlVdT TO ~ ' DRC 2006-00635, DRC2066-00634, A Dq,C4006-U0633 FEBRVPR Y'7008 OFFICE MU MIXED USE O OFFICE CO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE INDUSTRIAL LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUBLIC U UTILITY P PUBLIC ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA LAND USE PLAN 0 3 p m m 0 a 3 m n 0 a m W N ' n O V W N O 0 N N SUBAREA 3 P227 Rancho Cucamonga Develonment Code Section 17 08 030 Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium-High Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17.08 and 17.10. All uses that may be authorized under the Office designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08 and 17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable within the Mixed Use District. 2. Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Site: This 31.5 acre site is located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site: Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreaqe Range High Residential 40% - 45% 12.6 - 14.2 acres Office 55% - 60% 17.3 - 18.9 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.30. All uses and activities that ark permitted, or may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, under the High ` Residehtial, Office/Professional, General Commercial, and Industrial Park designations are subject to the same permitting processes and development standards as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.20, shall be applicable to any development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. 3. Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site: This 7.24-acre site is located at the base of "Red Hill" on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to a Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.06, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District." • This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). EXHIBIT B 17.08-1D 2/04 P228 Rancho Cucamonea Development Code Section 17 OS 030 4. Haven. Church and Center Site: This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre Offlce 0% - 100% 0 - 3.36 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, and 17.10. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to Development Code Chapter 17.10. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, and 17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. * This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). 5. Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue Site: This 17- acre site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium/Medium High 0% - 62% 0 - 10.54 acres Residential (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre Commercial -Retail, Office 0% - 100% 0 -17 acres (commercial and professionalj, and Restaurant ', The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32. All uses that may be authorized under the commercial designation are subject to Development Code Chapter 17.32. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. * This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. 17.08-11 2/04 P229 RESOLUTION NO. OB-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00633, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 166-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 10.5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, AND 04. A. Recitals. 1. Rancho Workforce Housing filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2006-00633, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of January and continued to the 13th day of February 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing on January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, with a Foothill Boulevard street frontage of 662 feet and a Center Avenue street frontage of 307 feet, and is presently improved with a commercial use (Espinoza Tire) and two-single family residences; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences. The property to the west is designated Community Commercial and is developed with commercial uses (Shop & Go, Twins Club, and Route 66 Memories). The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with a restaurant (The Whole Enchilada) and industrial uses. The property to the south is designated Commercial Office and is developed with restaurant, day care, and office uses; and c. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The applicant proposed the development of 166 workforce apartment units and a community recreational building center. The project also provides on-site parking and recreational amenities including a ~C ~eS ~ e2~~3 ` ;~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 2 P230 swimming pool, half basketball court, tot-lot, picnic tables and BBQ grilles, and two large (100 feet by 50 feet) fawn areas for open play; and e. The proposed density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the development standards of the Foothill Boulevard District density range for the Mixed Use District, which permits Multiple-Family Residential developments up to 20 dwelling units per acre; and f. The design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style. The exterior design elements for the new apartment units include fully tiled roofs, trimmed out windows and door openings, and walls clad in stucco and accented with fully grouted faux stone veneer. Moreover, landscaping and recreational amenities are well distributed around the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to-properties or improvements ih the vicinity. 4. The Planning Commission makes the following findings underthe requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act: a. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines"), the City prepared an Initial Environmental Study (the "Initial Study") forthe Project. The Initial Study concluded that there was substantial evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact on several specifically identified resources, including air quality, noise, and traffic. Pursuant to Guidelines 15064 and 15081, and based upon information contained in the Initial Study, the City ordered the preparation of an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. On October 1, 2007, the City prepared and sent a Notice of Preparation of the EIR to responsible, trustee, and other interested agencies and persons in accordance with Guidelines Section 15082(a) fora 30-day review period. The City circulated the Draft EIR to the public and other interested parties fora 45-day review period from November 15, 2007 through December 31, 2007, consistent with the 45-day public comment period required by Guidelines Section 15087(c) and 15105. During this public comment period, the City received six (6) written comment letters regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR. The City also received an additional two (2) letters after the 45-dayreview period, for a total of eight (8) written comment letters. The City prepared written responses to all the comment letters received on the Draft EIR in accordance with Public Resources Code § 21092.5 and Guideline 15088. b. The Planning Commission is the decision-making body for Development Review application DRC2006-00633 for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. For purposes of making its determination of the application, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") forthe Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with the oral and written testimony received thereon during the hearing priorto any action on the Project. Based on that review, the Planning Commission hereby PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 3 certifies that the FEIR was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and the Guidelines, and that it adequately addresses the impacts and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for the Development Review application DRC2006-00633, General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and all other approvals necessary to carry out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The Planning Commission further finds that that the modifications to the FEIR that have been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. c. The Planning Commission finds that based on the FEIR, additional public comments, and the written and oral staff report, that the Project will not cause significant environmental impacts except with respect to interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year 2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With respect to all of,these potentially significant impacted areas and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to less than significant. d. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR, and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific changes and alterations required are contained in ExhibitAto this resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of the Project. The Planning Commission finds that the mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant environmental effects of the Project. e. The Planning Commission finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project that might fuffiltthe basic objectives of the Project. These aifernatives include -the required no project alternative, the reduced intensity alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative, and the off-site location alternative. The alternatives identified in the FEIR are not feasible, as fully articulated in Exhibit A to this resolution, because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project orwould do so only to a much lesser degree, and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Planning Commission finds that each of the alternatives is determined to be infeasible. f. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission hereby adopts each of the mitigation measures set forth in the FEIR and incorporates those measures intothe Project. The Planning Commission also adopts the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in Appendix F of the FEIR and incorporated herein by reference. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval. g. The custodian of records for the FEIR, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. P231 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraph 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 4 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Final approval of Development Review DRC2006-00633 shall be contingent upon subsequent City Council approval of the associated General Plan Amendment (DRC2006-00635) and Development District Amendment (DRC2006-00634). 2) This approval is for the site plan, grading plan, exterior building design, and landscaping fora 166-unit multi-family workforce complex and associated site improvements as described in this report and depicted on approved plans on-file with the Planning Department. 3) The 166-unit multi-family housing complex is located in a proposed Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) and was designed to comply with the Medium Residential development standards, utilizing the Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions. The Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions applicable to this project include: a) A reduction in the Foothill Boulevard building setback from 55 feet to 47 feet. This setback reduction is applicable to Building A located on the east side of the Foothill Boulevard driveway. b) An increase in the maximum building height from 35 feet to 37 feet. This wall height increase is applicable to the 3-story buildings. c¢-::: - A'~:incfease ih the maximum wall heig~tfor a combination garden/retaining wall from 6 feet to 9.5 feet. Maximum wall height is measured from the mid-point of the retaining wall to the top of the garden wall. This wall height increase is applicable to the wall along the west project boundary. d) A project density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre, representing a 12.5 percent density increase above the Medium Residential District density range. 4) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval. 5) The design and height of decorative metal fences, gates, railings, and perimeter walls shall be submitted for final Planning Director review and approval during plan check. All decorative exterior metal elements shall be finished with high quality powder coat paint and properly maintained by the property owner in good condition at all times thereafter. 6) Primary daily pedestrian and vehicle access to the site shall be from Foothill Boulevard via the main entry gate nearest the Community Building. The use of the vehicle access gate on Center Avenue shall be limited to resident and emergency vehicles/responders only. 7) On-site structures (e.g., buildings, garages, fences, walls, gates, exterior lights, recreation equipment, etc.) and facilities (including parking lots) within the complex shall be maintained in good and presentable condition at all times. Any damaged areas shall be promptly repaired and restored to original P232 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 5 conditionlappearance to the greatest extent possible. All graffiti shall be promptly removed when discovered by on-site management or as notified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Engineering Department 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards including curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, 16,000 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, drive approach, traffic signs, and striping: a) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This designates a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatment, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancement area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC&R's. A portion of Foothill Boulevard median island including landscaping and irrigation shall be reconstructed. Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans accordingly to reflect the above improvements. b) The proposed gated entrance on Foothill Boulevard shall be in accordance with City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. P233 e ri. c;{- 'Afetftum lane on Fbdthilt Boulevard-shall be Qer Citq,,~tandard' d) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. e) Provide an easement for sidewalk purposes for the sidewalk located at the back of the main drive approach entrance. f) No accent paving within the City right-of-way is allowed. g) Driveway is to be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. 2) Center Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local Street" standards including curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, traffc signs, and striping: a) The Emergency Exit/Entry and Residential Exit Only drive approach shall be 35 feet wide per City Standard 105-C. 3) In compliance with the Final Environmental Impact Report as modified for Rancho Workforce Housing: a) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credit. If the City starts construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 6 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except 66 K~ on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site the westerly project boundary to the first pole off-site the easterly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developerfails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except 66 K~ on the project side of Center Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site the northerly project boundary to the first pole off-site the southerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. The City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the east, Parcel Map 15029, paid for as an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. 6) Construct appropriate off-site street improvements from transition to existing. 7) The Water Quality Management Plan ("WQMP") submitted with the tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on grading plans when submitted for technical plan check. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) During project construction the construction contractor shall implement the following measures to reduce fugitive dust. a) Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. b) All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. c) All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). d) Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. e) All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically or chemically stabilized. f) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. P234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-O6 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 7 2) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 3) The construction contractor shall utilize electric ordiesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 5) The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 6) The construction contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. Biological Resources 1) BIO-1. Apre-construction survey for the burrowing owl is required to confirm presence or absence of the species on the .proposed project site. The pre-construction survey for the burrowing owl'sfial(be conducted within 30"days prior to the commencement of grading activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall not be required. 2) BIO-2. Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated prior to the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be conducted per applicable California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not be permitted during the nesting season for this species. 3) BIO-3. Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1 and January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas. Cultural Resources P235 1) CUL-1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-O6 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 8 of the find shall be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist (meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course ofproject-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. 2) CUL-2. In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the vicinity of the discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations for further mitigation. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) HYD-1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from FEMA a Conditional Letter of Map Revision-Fill (CLOMR-F) to remove the propertyfrom the 100-year flood zone map. 2) HYD-2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and requirements including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro-modification impacts. Noise 1) .Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor uses, such as patios or park/recreation areas with a tine-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound wall/berm combination with an effective height of B feet. 2) Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 3) For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre parcel, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4) For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel, restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) unless the proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 5) The construction contractor shall implement the following mitigation measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. P236 6) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING February 13, 2008 Page 9 emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 7) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas along Foothill Boulevard, away from existing residences to create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 8) During all site excavation and grading, the projecUconstruction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 9) For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a residential use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 10) In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the tire shop, a 6-foot high wall surrounding the tire shop will be required in orderto reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than significant level. TrafFc and Circulation 1) The developer shall construct a traffic .signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. 6. The Secretary fo this Commission slab certifiy to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Fletcher, Vice Chairman ATTEST:~iwrvv~' Jamefc R. Troyer, AICP, Se retary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P237 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART P238 EXHIBIT A TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 Findings and Facts in Support of Findings I. Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that will occur if a project is approved or carried out unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific econdmic, sobial, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Rancho Workforce Housing Project. These findings are based upon evidence presented in the record of these proceedings, both written and oral, the FEIR and all of its contents, the Comments and Responses to Comments on the FEIR, and staff and consultants' reports presented to the Planning Commission. II. Project Objectives As set forth in the FEIR, the objectives of the project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: A. Locate development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts; B. Provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community; C. More fully utilize the availability of existing public improvements, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public; D. Augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City; and 11231-0001 \l 031054~~3.doc P239 E. Promote balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an Initial study to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation, certain impacts of the Project were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study, and were not analyzed in the Draft EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural Resources; (C) Biological Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (D) Cultural Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (E) Geology and Soils; (F) Hazardous and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (H) Land Use and Planning; (I) Mineral Resources; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Recreation; and (M) Utilities. IV. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Less Than Significant, and Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A general biological resources assessmentlfield study was conducted as part of the Initial Study to aid in the determination that the following issue areas would result in a less than significant impact. However, there still remains the potential for a significant impact to result to the following issue areas. As a result, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. A. Biological Resources Burrowing Owl The Project site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously used for agricultural purposes. Because of this, there is a lack of suitable habitat on the Project site and no probability for the occurrence of any sensitive species except with regard to the burrowing owl. Although the probability of the occurrence of the burrowing owl is low, the EIR has identified a mitigation measure to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: BIO-1: A precondition survey for the burrowing owl is required to confrm presence or absence of the species on the proposed project site. The pre-construction survey for the burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to the commencement of grading activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall not be required. I 1 ?3 I -0001 V 031054v3.doc P240 BIO-2: Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated prior to the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be conducted per applicable California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not be permitted during the nesting season for this species. b. Facts in Support of Findings Currently, the northwest ahd center portions of the proposed project site provide marginally suitable habitat for the burrowing owl. Although a Field Study was conducted as part of the Initial Study, apre-construction survey for the owl is required to confirm the presence or absence of the owl from the site to avoid impacts to any owl(s). Vegetation in these areas is low to moderate in height and interspersed with debris piles, thus providing a potential for owl occupancy. Vegetation within the northeastern portion consists of remnant vineyards, overgrown with ruderal vegetation. This portion of the project site would provide marginally suitable habitat as well, should conditions change (i.e., with vegetation removal). The burrowing owl is a mobile species; therefore, apre-construction survey is required to ensure no impact to burrowing owls that may occupy the proposed project site. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant. 2. Raptors The Project site contains a few large ornamental trees which could be suitable roosting or nesting trees for raptors. During the field survey conducted as part of the biological resources assessment conducted as part of the Initial Study, no nest for raptors were observed. However, because raptors are mobile and- there is the possibility that nests may have been established during the period since the Initial Study, there is the potential for a significant impact. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure articulated below, any impact will be reduced to less than significant levels. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: BIO-3: Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1 and January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre- construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas. b. Facts in Support of Findings Because any raptor nests in the trees located on the project site may have been established after the Initial Study field survey, there is the potential for a significant impact with regard to raptors. However, with the incorporation of the above identified mitigation I I ?3 I -0001 U 031054v3.doc P241 measure, any impact will be reduced to a less than significant level. The mitigation measure specifies the pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted, and that removal of trees shall be limited to the period outside the nesting season for raptors. Further, the mitigation measure requires that a qualifed biologist be contacted if raptor nests or nesting birds are located. These measures will ensure a less than significant impact. B. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the Project site. Further, through compliance with Senate Bill 18 which requires notification of the Project to potentially affected Native American Tribes, only one Tribe responded indicating that there was no knowledge of any specific cultural or sacred resources on the site. Nevertheless, the potential to uncover an archeological resource may be present. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the . project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-1: In the event a cultural resources is uncovered during the course of grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the fnd shall be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualifed archeologist (meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. b. Facts in Support of Findings Although the site is located in a developed area where significant ground disturbance has occurred, the potential may still exist to uncover an archeological resource. With the incorporation of the above identified mitigation measure, any impact to an archeological resource will be less than significant. Specifically, if any archeological resource is found, any ground-disturbing activities will be relocated and a qualified archeologist will be consulted. Further, the archeological resource will be recorded and/or removed per City and State regulations. This will ensure that any impact is reduced to a less than significant level. 2. Paleontological Resources The project site is located in an area containing extensive existing development. The development of the existing roadway, curbs, sidewalks, infrastructure, and nearby structures would have required a large amount of ground disturbance that would have likely resulted in the discovery of or destruction of existing paleontological resources. While there have been no paleontological resources recorded within the City and the project area has previously been disturbed, the potential to uncover a paleontological resource may still be present. a. Findings 1 L31-0001\1031054v3.doc P242 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects ident~ed in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-2: In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the vicinity of the discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the fnd and make recommendations for further mitigation. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, any potential impact on paleontological resources will be less than significant. The measure will ensure that any excavation of the Project site will be halted when paleontological resources are encountered and that a qualified paleontologist be consulted, thereby ensuring a less than significant impact. C. Hydrology and Water Quality 1. Structures Other than Residential in 100-year Flood Hazard Area Because a portion of the Project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area, and because a small portion of Hermosa Avenue (adjacent to the Project site) is prone to flooding, there is the potential for a significant impact to result. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, any potential impact will be less than significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") a Conditional Letter of Map Revision -Fill (CLOMR-F) to remove property from the 100-year flood zone map. .HYD -2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and requirements including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro- modification impacts. b. Facts in Support of Findings The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) identify areas subject to 100-year flooding. An area along Hermosa Avenue is shown within the 100-year flood hazard area on the FIRMS. The conceptual plan for 5 II?31-0001\10310S4v3.doc P243 the western portion of the project site includes commercial, office space, and a restaurant. The structures associated with the western portion of the project site may fall within the 100-year flood hazard area. Proper storm drainage facilities shall be constructed on the project site as part of the drainage plans to be reviewed and approved by the Building, Official and City Engineer. Implementation of the features and facilities contained in the approved drainage plan will help to ensure that impacts associated with flooding or redirection of flood water flows are less than significant. In addition, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD-1 and HYD-2, impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant. V. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant A. Noise Impacts Certain noise impacts were studied in the EIR and found to be less than significant. Specifically, noise construction associated with groundbourne vibration was determined to be less than significant, as was the potential for the Project to expose people in the Project area to excessive noise levels based on the proximity to an airport. Further, the Project is not anticipated to cause excessive off-site traffic noise impacts. Although these noise impacts were found to be less than significant, other noise impacts, as articulated below, were found to be significant requiring mitigation. B. Air Quality Impacts Certain air quality impacts were studied in the EIR and also found to be less than significant. Specifically: (1) the proposed Project is consistent with the most recent Air Quality Management Plan; (2) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to construction emissions, with the exception of fugitive dust articulated below; (3) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to operational emissions; (4) the proposed Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations from architectural coatings; (5) the proposed Project will not impose short-term health risk impacts on sensitive receptors; and (6) the proposed Project will not create objectionable odors. VI. Effects Studied in the EIR But Which Have the Potential to Become Significant, But Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A. Air Quality Fugitive Dust Emissions The proposed Project is not anticipated to have a significant impact with regard to construction related fugitive dust emissions. Nevertheless, to ensure this impact remains less than significant, mitigation measures have been identified. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P244 4.1.1A During project construction the construction contractor shall implement the following measures to reduce fugitive dust. (A) Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. (B) All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. (C) All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). (D) Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (E) All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically or chemically stabilized. (F) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. 4.1.16 The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. . 4.1.1C The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel powered equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible. 4.1.1D The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.1.1 E The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.1.1E The construction contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. b. Facts in Support of Findings 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P245 Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on aproject-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions at the time of construction. The project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM10 component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. The following are the applicable Rule 403 Measures: • Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). • Water active sites at least twice daily. (Locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). • .All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114 (freeboard means vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer). • Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road. • Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 mph or Tess. Additional dust suppression measures in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are included as Mitigation Measures 4.1.1A through 4.1..1E to ensure that impacts remain less than significant. In sum, through compliance with Rule 402 and 403 as well as the additional measures incorporated as mitigation measures, this impact will be less than significant. VII. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to be Significant, But Reduced to a Level of Insignificance Through Mitigation The following impacts were analyzed in the EIR and found to be significant. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, these impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. The Planning Commission identified in the Final EIR (and significant level. A. Noise finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project below) would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than Il?31-0001\1031054v3.doc P246 Interior Noise Levels The analysis in the EIR demonstrates that construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the on-site proposed residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.1A Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with a line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot-high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor uses, such as patios or park/recreation areas with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound wall/berm combination with an effective height of 8 feet. 4.2.16 Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.1C For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre parcel, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2,1D For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel, restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a. m.-10:00 p.m.) unless the proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. b. Facts in Support of Findings The proposed residential uses would potentially be exposed to high traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, mitigation measures are required to ensure that the sensitive receptor locations are not exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the City's standards. Whether or not a specific apartment building is subject to the established mitigation measures depends on the building's location within the project. For residential units within the project site, the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would result in the construction of sound walls and mechanical ventilation. The sound walls would provide a 5 to 7 dBA or more in noise reduction for ground- floor receptors. With a combination of walls, doors, and windows, standard construction for southern California residential buildings would provide more than 20 dBA in exterior-to-interior noise reduction with windows closed and 12 dBA with the windows open. However, with windows open, there is a potential for interior noise on the ground floor units to exceed the 45 dBA Ld„ standard (i.e., 63 dBA - 12 dBA = 51 dBA). Therefore, the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2.1A would be required to ensure that windows can remain closed for a prolonged period of time. Further, with the implementation of all the identified mitigation measures, noise levels would be reduced to a level that would be consistent with the City's 11231.0001\1031054v3.doc P247 General Plan noise standards. Therefore, impacts associated with this issue would be mitigated to level that is considered to be less than significant. 2. Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts Construction noise impacts resulting from the proposed Project will be potentially adverse requiring mitigation. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.2A The construction contractor shall implement the following mitigation measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to B:OD p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. 4.2.26 The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site 4.2.2C The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4.2.2D During all site excavation and grading, the project/ construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. b. Facts in Support of Findings Noise levels from demolition, grading, and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA Lmaz at the closest residential uses to the north of the project site for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse. Typical noise levels range up to 91 dBA Lmax at 50 feet during the noisiest construction phases. The site preparation phase, which includes site excavation and grading, tends to generate the highest noise levels, because the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers, dozers, draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full-power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower-power settings. Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. Noise typically associated with the use of construction equipment is estimated between 79 and 89 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet 10 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P248 from the construction effort for the grading phase. This equipment would be used on site. Each dozer would generate a maximum of 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, and water and pickup trucks would generate approximately 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual noise source, the worst-case composite noise level during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from an active construction area. As these noise sources are point sources, the noise decreases at a rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The nearest residences are located to the north of the project site along Stafford Street. These residences are approximately 25 feet from the project boundary and may be subjected to short-term noise reaching 97 dBA Lmax intermittently generated by construction activities on site. Additionally, demolition of the existing buildings on the western 5-acre parcel may occur after the project apartments are occupied; however, these will be no closer than the existing residences. This level of noise is comparable with vehicular traffic noise on Foothill Boulevard. Construction-related noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse; however, with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. To minimize the impact of the construction noise on residences adjacent to the project area, compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance would be required. Because Construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the closest residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed, the above identified mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. More specifically, by limiting construction hours, using noise mufflers on construction equipment, and placing construction equipment and staging areas away from residential uses, this significant impact will be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3. Long Term Operational Noise Impacts The EIR found that the proposed Project would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels associated with long-term operations of the proposed Project. This significant impact will be reduced to a less than significant level with the imposition of mitigation measures. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.3A For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a residential use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2.36 In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the tire shop, a 6-foot-high wall surrounding the tire shop will be required in order to reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than significant level. 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P249 b. Facts in Support of Findings Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would be associated primarily with operations at the on-site commercial uses. These commercial uses would generate noise from truck delivery, loading/unloading activities, and other activities at the parking lot. These activities are potential point sources of noise that could affect noise-sensitive receptors adjacent to the loading areas, such as the proposed residential uses on site. For example, there is an auto tire shop located on the project site near the center of the Foothill Boulevard frontage that would project noise to the surrounding proposed residences. This business is scheduled to be removed; however, it is possible it will continue operation for some period after the apartment portion of the project is built. Noise sources from the auto tire shop include customer-generated noises as well as noises associated with auto services, such as pneumatic drills, hydraulic lifts, and other machinery or equipment typically used in such operations. It is anticipated that the closest project residences will be located no less than 100 feet from the auto service area. Peak noise levels associated with the auto service activities would range up to BO dBA Lmxx at 50 feet. Noise attenuation from a point source will drop off at 6 dBA per doubling of the distance, resulting in a noise reduction of 6 dBA at 100 feet from the source. Therefore, the homes 100 feet from these auto service activities would experience noise levels up to 74 dBA Lmax. This range of maximum noise levels is lower than the daytime exterior noise standards of 75 dBA Lmax; however, even with windows closed, it exceeds the daytime interior noise standards of 45 dBA Lmax. A 6-foot-high coricrete masonry wall surrounding the tire shop would provide a minimum of 6 dBA in noise attenuation to the nearby residences, thus reducing the daytime interior noise levels to below the standard (60 dBA - 6 dBA - 24 dBA - 6 dBA = 44 dBA). It is assumed that the auto service operations do not occur after 10:00 p.m. Further, delivery trucks for the anticipated on-site office/retail/restaurant uses would result in a maximum noise similar to noise readings from loading and unloading activities for other projects, which generates a noise level of 75 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Based on the site plan, the restaurant will be located in the southwest corner of the site, more than 400 feet from the nearest proposed on-site residence and more than 600 feet from existing residences to the north. Therefore, with the distance divergence, loading/ unloading noise would potentially reach up to 57 dBA Lmex at the ground level of the nearest residences to the east and 53 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the north. This potential maximum noise level would not exceed the daytime exterior noise standard of 60 dBA; however, it would exceed the nighttime exterior 55 dBA L25 standard at the nearest proposed on-site residence if the noise lasts more than 15 minutes in any hour. Although a typical truck unloading process takes an average of 15-20 minutes, this maximum noise level occurs in a much shorter period of time, (i.e., in a few minutes). As long as the maximum noise level occurs in a time period less than 15 minutes in any hour, a nighttime exterior 60 dBA L,~ standard will not be exceeded. Therefore, noise associated with. loading and unloading activities at the restaurant would not result in noise levels exceeding either the daytime or nighttime exterior standards at the nearest residences to the north or the east. Standard building construction in southern California would provide 24 dBA or more in noise reductioh from exterior to interior with windows and doors closed and 12 dBA or more with windows and doors open. With windows closed, the maximum interior noise attributable to the restaurant loading/unloading activities would be reduced to 33 dBA Lmax. With 12 1 1231-0001 V 031054v3.doc P250 windows open, it would be reduced to 45 dBA Lmax. Thus, only with windows open could the nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax be exceeded. Therefore, the restaurant deliveries must be restricted to daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). In sum, because the tire shop may operate for a time after the residential units of the Project are constructed and occupied, Mitigation Measure 4.2.36 will be implemented to reduce any potential significant impact to a less than significant level. Further because the maximum interior noise attributable to the retail/office loading/unloading activities would only be reduced to 41 dBA Lmax at the existing residences to the north (which exceeds the nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax), Mitigation Measure 4.2.26 will be implemented which will require delivery hours to be restricted ensuring the nighttime interior noise standard will not be exceeded by the operations of the Project. B. Traffic 1. Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the commercial portion of project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: • Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would result in LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. As identified above, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is forecast to exceed the satisfactory level of service of D in 2009 with the commercial conditions of the project. However, in the 2009 without project scenario, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection would also operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour which is an unsatisfactory level of service, and at 2007 existing conditions, this P.M. peak hour is at LOS E. However, because the forecast level of service at this intersection exceeds the minimum service standard of D in the year 2009 plus commercial scenario, a significant impact will result. 13 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P251 To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Commercial Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Opening Year 2009 with Residential Project Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Residential Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR.. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1 A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the residential portion of the project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection levels of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: • Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. However, even without the project (i.e., with just the 2009 baseline), the above intersection would operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour, which is an unsatisfactory level of service. Further, at existing 2007 conditions, the P.M. peak hour LOS level is at LOS E. Impacts to this intersection are considered a significant impact of the proposed project. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Residential Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 3. Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) Traffic and Level of Service 14 1 1231-000 I U 031054v3.doc P252 The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa AvenuelChurch Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the addition of the entire project (commercial and residential) traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard of LOS D: • Hermosa Avenue/Church Street would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. The level of service deficiency at the Hermosa Avenue and Church Street intersection is also forecast to occur in the year 2009 without the project; thus, the project would not produce the LOS deficiency by itself. Nonetheless, the project does contribute to the level of service deficiencies, resulting in a significant impact, and mitigation is required. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection are reduced to less than signifcant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa AvenuelChurch Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Entire Project Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. VIII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in the EIR. The City considered a range of reasonable alternatives as more fully discussed in the EIR. Some of these alternatives were rejected outright and were not analyzed in the EIR because they would not fulfill the basic project objectives. This range included: (1) No Build Alternative; (2) the Business Offce Alternative; and (3) the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative. With regard to the No Build Alternative, no development would take place on the site, and the project site would be retained in its current condition. The existing tire shop, residences, strawberry fields, and commercial uses would remain on the property. Disallowing development of the site, as suggested by this alternative, would impose conditions that conflict 15 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P253 with the existing vision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the site and the project area. The No Build Alternative does not represent the highest or best use of the site. Furthermore, retention of the project site in its current condition would not fulfill the primary objectives of the proposed project and would not provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community or augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City. The substantial economic and land use benefits derived from the development of .the proposed project would be forfeited. Consequently, the No Build Alternative was rejected from further consideration in the EIR. With regard to the Business Office Alternative, The Business Office Altemative consists of the development of the project site entirely with office uses. The development of the entire site with such uses would not provide the varied retail, residential, and service uses associated with the proposed project. Additionally, the development of office uses would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community. Thus, this alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. Third, the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative would only consist of the development of 166 apartments that are proposed as part of the project. The office and commercial portions would not be developed as part of this alternative. The development of a portion of the site with residential uses would not provide the varied retail and service uses associated with the proposed project. Similar to the alternative for office uses, the development of apartments alone would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it bring new revenue-generating uses in the City. Additionally, the development of the residential portion alone would fail to achieve the objectives of the proposed project, in particular including promotion of "balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy," and providing "additional jobs to the local economy." This alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. B. Alternatives Analyzed in the EIR. The EIR however did undertake an analysis of three other potential project alternatives. These three alternatives were also rejected for the various reasons stated below. No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The No Project Alternative assumes what would reasonably be expected to occur, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services, in the foreseeable future. The project site is currently zoned Community Commercial and designated for General Commercial uses. Given the goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the continuing trend of infill development in the project area, it is highly reasonable in the event the proposed project were not approved, that the site would be developed with some type of commercial use. Within the Commercial zone, uses including offices, retail commercial, and general services are allowed. With the No Project Alternative, development of a retail commercial use is assumed at a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 25 percent, allowing up to 185,000 square feet of commercial floor space. 16 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P254 b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative, the project site is assumed to be developed with a commercial use consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning. With this alternative, significant unavoidable air quality impacts would occur that do not occur with the proposed project. In addition, impacts related to aesthetics, traffic, and noise would be increased over those of the proposed project. The No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative has been rejected because it would have greater impacts to air quality, noise, and traffic than the proposed project. In addition this alternative would not meet all of the City's objectives, which includes the failure of the alternative to "provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community." 2. Reduced Intensity Alternative Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the project site would be developed with approximately 75 percent of the residential, commercial, office, and restaurant uses envisioned under the proposed project. This alternative would result in 125 apartment units, a 3,750- square foot restaurant, an 18,750-square foot office building, and 12,000 square feet of retail shops. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the Reduced Intensity Alternative, visual resource impacts would be similar. Impacts related to short-term construction-related air quality and noise impacts would be reduced although similar to those identified with the proposed project. Further, long-term air quality operational emissions under this alternative would remain less than significant, although reduced in magnitude. Because of the reduction in vehicle trips achieved under this alternative, impacts to the operation of local roadways and intersections would be proportionally reduced from the proposed project. Under this alternative, the proposed project objectives are met, although to a lesser degree. Reducing the amount of commercial square footage would decrease the amount of revenue forecast to be generated by the proposed project. This Reduced Intensity Alternative has been rejected, because it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. 3. All Residential Project Alternative a. Summary of Alternative With the All Residential Alternative, development of apartment units similar to those in the proposed project would occur. This alternative assumes that the existing restaurant on the southeastern 1.5-acre corner of the project (the Whole Enchilada) would remain. Residential apartment uses would take place on 15.54 acres of the site and would be developed at the same density as the proposed project with 15.75 units per acre, resulting in 245 apartment units. This alternative would result in the same removal of all other existing uses on the property as the proposed project. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative 17 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P255 WRh the All Residential Project Alternative, potential impacts associated with short-term construction related air quality and noise impacts would remain similar to those identified with the proposed project. Impacts related to traffic operations would be proportionally reduced in relation to the reduction in trip generation between the All Residential Project Alternative and the proposed project. The volume of pollutants emitted during operation of the project under this alternative would be reduced and would be less than significant. The change in the vehicle noise achieved under this alternative would not be perceptible. With the reduction of traffic resulting from the development of the All Residential Project Alternative, air emissions and noise levels would be correspondingly reduced; however, the significance of air, noise, and traffic impacts would remain similar to those of the proposed project and would be less than significant. New housing opportunities would be created with the additional residential apartments planned for this alternative, however, the absence of retail uses from the project site would most likely reduce (sales tax) revenue to' the City and therefore not meet all project objectives. 4. Off Site Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The Off-Site Location Alternative analyzes the impacts of the proposed project in a different location. This alternative would be composed of the same intensity and the same uses in an alternative location. An alternative site would require adequate land,- access, and services, and must be compatible with adjacent uses. The selected location for the off-site alternative is southeast of the proposed project, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This site is currently zoned for industrial park uses and is approximately 17 acres. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative The Off-Site Alternative would have similar impacts to the proposed project in all impact areas with the exception of Hydrology and Water Quality which would be reduced. The Off-Site Alternative is not in a redevelopment area and does not meet the City's objective of locating development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts and therefore has been rejected, 5. Environmentally Superior Alternative The EIR has identified the Reduced Intensity Alternative as the environmentally superior alternative. However, because this alternative would meet the project objectives to a lesser degree than the proposed Project, the alternative has been rejected. More specifically, it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. C. The Project As Proposed Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the EIR. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed IS 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P256 The Planning Commission has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of the Alternatives described in the EIR and has compared it with those of the proposed Project. The Planning Commission finds that the various Alternatives are infeasible for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons as discussed above. The Planning Commission further finds that the Project as, proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interests of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the proposed Project locates development within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency project area designated for redevelopment, and as analyzed in the FEIR, minimizes any potential environmental effects. The proposed Project also provides 166 apartment units as workforce housing. Further, the proposed Project will make use of the availability of existing public improvements by locating the Project in a developed area, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public. The proposed Project also will help augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City with the addition of 16,000 square feet of retail shops, and a 5,OOD square foot restaurant. Finally, the proposed Project will be an example of balanced, effcient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to residents and other users, and will strengthen the local economy by the addition of 25,000 square feet of office space, as well as retail and restaurant uses. For all of these reasons, the Planning Commission has selected the proposed Project. ' ]9 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P257 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for use in implementing mitigation measures for: Rancho Workforce Housing The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2007101001) prepared for the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment (Public Resource Code §21081.6). The law states that the reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program contains the following elements: • Action and Procedure. The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several mitigation measures. • Compliance and Verification. A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • Flexibility. The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations bythose responsible for the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. As changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. On the following pages are Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program checklist. EXHIBIT I (1/312006) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST Project File Name: Prepared by: Rancho Workforce Housing EIR Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: January 7, 2008 City of Rancho Cucamonga .. ~`'AIR1QUAL~'TiYy~r,'~~' z a a, ._ F, _ Y is 4.1.1A. During project construction the construction contraclorshall implement BO C A/D 4!7 the following measures to reduce fugitive dust. • Revegelate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. • All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). • Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. • All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically or chemically stabilized. • The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. 4.1.1 B. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment BO B/C D 2/4 used on site based on low emission (actors and high energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.1.1 C. The construction contractor shall utilize electric ordiesel-powered BO ~ C A 2/3 equipment in lieu ofgasoline-powered engines where feasible. (1 /31 /2008) ~ N (71 W -, .- 4.1.1 D. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading CE/BO B C 2 plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.1.1 E. The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as BO C A 7 to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safely adjacent to existing roadways. 4.1.7 F. The construction contractor shall support and encourage PD C A ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. i r -iiaF i~'""~';*'~~~}~ °'r1~,~`~575 `!'.'t~'~`G 7BIOLOGICAL`RESOURCES'~~'^ ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~'i ~~ ' 4~ ` r ~ ~~ ~,.ts. - - ' a ,,tkrs~se~ '~ ~ ?"~'e`~`t ~~~t ' ~ ~ ti, ryRr-ix~~~^,yYt_.'. t T ~~ . s l r`.... ._-.....~.,_:~.... ~......._...~.__.w.....~iJ'r._!_,.,~¢.,. .u~ ..L ~~'r., dG.uw.r7.'~ h~...~..~ ,. r . .u.+~r _Ht.~S,- ,t _ ~_.L,c . n, y ,,_ .mac .-r . tii . A ._ -~twls ' x ~..{`.. e ..Se.a....a _. S .v : BIO-1. A pre-constmction survey for the burrowing owl is required to confirm PD B City Review of D 2 presence or absence of the species on the proposed project site. The pre- Focused construction survey far the burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days Survey. prior to the commencement of grading activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall not be required. 810-2. Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated prior to PD B/C D 2 the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be conducted per applicable CDFGand/or USFWS procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not be permitted during the nesting season for this species. BIO-3. Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1 and PD B/C D 2/4 ' January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas. (1/312008) ~ N -, .. #1G_U_L'TUR_A_La RESOURCE_b'K~~,~~"¢r'y~5~"",~"'.. -r`a--ir~wi',~*~i' .2~C5,..~6..~-A-'Sa.+w'~1k$.y ~. f~f ~i...a-...`F asw'M: f~ti. 4 1.°N~'y~;y`~t'+ ~3,~,~y~ .4,tu:n~t~„r .~"v m '.t ~'~ `~il+`~yt#..~a^~ wry, Sn _.Xi` d '~~~a1 v-T.a#~.. r~.x'~4 $"N ~4- ~ii~-{3. ./p4aSY., µ~'p"" ~~2^Jx.C~~^~ "r`,~.1'su~R.,C~+~+P'~'~yr ;.1,~ T 34'iY' 3L Ala' +n%a.r.Y.. CUL-1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of PD/BO C During grading A 4 grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity and construction of the find shall be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist (meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or Slate regulations. CUL-2. In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during PD/BO C During grading A ~ 4 construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the and construction vicinity of the discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations for further mitigation. t:HYDROL•OGY>AND WATE __,.t ~3~i z'r$°.r l~ G,~n~. 3~}a r'^v~egt~s'.s R QUALITY ,..~ ~ ~~ '~ ' .'~i `-'~3`~F~t~y',~^ '~`~ ~ p 53" A~l~~ #s ~ ) ` ~ r, F~` ~ a"~._.rslr+.t~~" ~"3 - 6 t ` w ~ ,~~•.?:y rY ~w i '~i ~ ~ S~ ~ a~~.5th`At*F~°z"n ~ fm~'~5:~1-Td"}':4.i . " ~ ~~ ; ~ .~., I,d .. ........: ....~. -,.,..-,._ ~..~;.. fi......u . : ...:{..,,. xw.=-r. .:?lkn. ;.,x ro..o.te. F3.~ . S>,4,rulY Ya u .° 3 . ~n al?us . ~,~n , n ..K ';!<~. .:,n;. ~.1~ t.k 3 'd. HYD-1. Priorto the issuance of grading permits forthe western approximately CE B Cily Review of B/C/D 1/2 five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from FEMA Grading and a Conditional Leller of Map Revision -Fill (CLOMR-F) to remove the property Building Plans from the 100-year flood zone map. HYD-2. Priorto the issuance of grading permits forthe western approximately CE B City Review of B/C/D 1/2 five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading and supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and Building Plans requirements including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro-modification impacts. S ,~~ ~':r 9 ~+ 1 fY~ll ~"{ `~ 8'k"~St S} S .i(. YS WAl JYl~. i td i` YAI.y.*f'~ NOISE t~ U r s a v ~1 ( ~ ~ Y, ~,i 1CC1 3.{.4.%~± y$~ ~ ~ ~~ ..'a` !l?'' -~ ~ yc [?. ~~.~pi~' C~ft ~N .} "f "4 '~ i ~ 'W ~F#"< `k n t ~~ " ~ T N ~P 1 ni ~>f R 4 ~d "x3` <r d~h; YF$v-'. r i~ 1?.. ~ ° " I~ ~ . :. .~:.. xss.u.'..uah~,nJ_w+..._ss x-~.~9.res~..a~we. ..3a x.~.,.,'L~.•?~wx ».«~~ax. red- ~ ~. C a~~a ;3z . -iv.,~ ..- e~ it.~~:r.' '~. ,.ri a.~ .e ,. rv3. iC t ~ i: r~r" hJ z:. r. sH 4.2. 1A. Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill BO C/D During A/C ~ 3/4 Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air construction conditioning system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with a line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot-high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor uses, such as patios or park/recrealion areas with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound wall/berm combination with an effective height of 8 feet. (1/31/2008) .- 4.2.18. Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center BO C/D During A!C 3/4 Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air construction conditioning system. 4.2.1 C. For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre parcel, PD E During A 7 delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 Operation p.m.). 4.2.1 D. For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel, PD E A 7 restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p. m.) unless the proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.2A. The construction contractor shall implement the following mitigation pp/6O C A 4/7 measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours - of 6:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. . 4.2.2 B. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment 80 C A 7 so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4.2.2C. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas B0 C A 7 along Foothill Boulevard, away from existing residences to create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4.2.2D. During all site excavation and grading, the projecUconstruction B0 C A 7 contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 4.2.3A. For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a residential pD E During A 7 use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.- Operation 10:00 p.m.). , (1/372008) N m -, .. 4.2.38. In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and BO A/D A/D 3 occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the lire shop, a 6-foot-high wall surrounding the fire shop will be required in order to reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than significant level. «._... ~;TRANSPORT'ATIOPI~A~JD~TRAFF~C>~~ `~°~ ", =i• `~^-.~~. ~ '"~'~ ~ ~.. .~:...,...~.+ w...,.Mi.. z.r.,s.....E. ..,.r.~~e ~~~.£?'a'~il~~~~'~ ` s "`~-" ~:~.ih:~b4G~ti _ - "3E U1~1 ~ ,r : ~ ~' ~~~,r'~ t-*S ~ ; 4 +.r~; i ' . ~-. ~ 4.3.1 A. The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of CE/PD . M C -v :.. w Issuance of ~.:. I.~ .~w 2.. C fs.::..i~~E~~; E!zfi5'.3tr3i+..x`f, .F.a.-.~3w 2 Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the Occupancy event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of ~ Permits building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. Key to Checklist Abbreviations cLah `~r~a'Y ~~« aau ~.. `v`im /4 `. fte~ onsl~le"Fdrsonk~~~~` 1..3f.`/Y~3Y~S:a1.~..4J9..Set ~ :X" Z~: .z. ~»~.~k ~ 7 c Zt~ty-93afi` F.'w:^/t"~.=w' ~~',rrr`Mo~SrtonngtF~requenEy-°_" .w A'5 ~ ~~. `~' ~ E ' _. a-ua. raF a oxen a ~Me~io'd fY~~rific~tion' ~~ ~ - ~ " ' ' ' ' ' 0. ~ '~~~ r ~~`~'~'~$dhj~d~~'.~ ~°` lf ~ N~ ~ . _ „ . . . .. . ~. e.+ ~.. az.,.~ ..^`~ .:i :.ss ,. . w ~•=3 ~ ~i >~i5s.«s~:r S 1,_ s. a i . r %?F '^_".'.,Yb:klai."~f1t` b~~ ..~ PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection 1: Withhold Recordation of Final Map ~ CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior To Construction B: Other Agency Permit /Approval . 2: Withhold Grading or Building Permit 80: Building Official or designee C: Throughout Construction. C: Plan Check 3: Withhold Certificate of Occupancy PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4: Stop Work Order FC: Fire Chief or designee E: Operating 5: Retain Deposit or Bonds 6: Revoke CUP 7: Citation (1/37/2008) N N P263 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC 2006-00633 SUBJECT: Development Review APPLICANT: Rancho Workforce Housing LOCATION: North/ side of Foothill Boulevard and west side of Center Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of DRC2006-00633 is granted subject to the approval of GPA DRC2006-00635 and DDA DRC2006-00634. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-04, Standard Conditions, and alt environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. SC-1-O5 Completion Date -/-/- -/_/. 1:1PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. oRC zoo6-oorP264 Completion Date 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.75 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,656.75_X_ 5. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program -The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program B. Time Limits DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first: 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. -~-~- -~-~- _~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~- - -~-~- -~- - -~_~ I:\PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM\2008 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC Zoos-ooP265 Completion Date D. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 14. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. if a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 15. For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 16. For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided. 17. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the Development Code. Shopping Centers The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to separate Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. E. Building Design An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. -/-/- -/-/- _/-/ -/_/_ -/-/- _/-- -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/-/- -/-/- -/-- I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2DD8 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2006-00633SidCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oosP2(i6 Completion Date F 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, _/_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. 4. For all residential development, provide conduit from each uniUlot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Pa rking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _I_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and _/_/_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 7. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 8. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 4 I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Projeot No. DRC Zoos-ooeP267 Completion Date G. H. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent ofthe required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. La ndscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/ / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _ _ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior f nal map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 5Otrees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within _/_/_ the project: 5% - 48-inch box or larger, 5 % - 36-inch box or larger, 20 %- 24-inch box or larger _ and 70 % - 15-gallon. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/ the continual maintenance of alt landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas _ within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 7. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. _ I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oorP268 Completion Date 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. _ 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require _ separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior _I_/_ to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. J. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to _ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _I / of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ _ mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; I:\PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-006335tdCond 2-13.tloc Project No. DRC zoo6-ooeP269 Completion Date b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC 2006-00633) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2006-00633). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. N. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~- - -~-~- -~-~- - -~. -~- - -~-~- I',\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oorP270 Completion Date 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _I_/_ Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. _/_/_ 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _I_/_ 7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 8. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_I_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/ fire-resistive construction. _ O. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_I_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/ pertorm such work. _ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction .reports shall be completed, _/_/ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building _ permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. P. Additional Requirements/Comments 1. Project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code Chapter _/ / 11A (Housing Accessibility). _ _ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/ street centerline): _ As needed total feet on Foothill Boulevard / / 33 total feet on Center Avenue _ % % 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/_/ deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. _ 8 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-73.doc Project No. DRC 2006-OOiP271 Comoletion Date R. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded. 4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X X (b) Center Avenue X X X X X X (b) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffc signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer -~_~. -~_ . -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- _/_/ -~-~- -~-- I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Sd rep\DRC2006-006335tdCond 2-t 3.doc Project No. DRC zoos-aop272 Completion Date Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specifed. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. . g. Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 10 -~-~- -~-~- -~- - -~-~- -~- - I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stt rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oosP273 Completion Date 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Mln. Grow Street Nama Botanical Nama Common Name Space Spacing Size txy. Center Avenue Brachychlton Bottle Tree 5' 25' o.c. 15 Fill popuioneus GAL. in Under Utilities Magnolia NCN 3' 20 o.c. 15 Grandiflora St. GAL. Mary Foothill Prunus blireiana NCN 3' 20' o.c. 15 Boulevard Informal GAL. Non Activities groupings not more Centers -Accent 25% of Tree total front age trees Non Activities Prunus blireiana California Sycamore B' 35' o.c. 15 Centers Informal GAL, groupins Non Activities. Prunus blireiana London Plane Tree 8' 30' o.c. 15 Centers Informal GAL, groupins Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. S. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard. 11 -~-~- -~-~- -~- -~-- I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-13.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oo~P274 Completion Date T. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _I_/_ property from adjacent areas. U. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the I /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. V. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one _/_/_ parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the frst six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if _ at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 12 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12008 Res & Stf rep\DRC20D6-00633StdCond 2-73.doc Project No. DRC zoos-oorP275 Completion Date 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_I_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. _/_/_ X. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. _/_/_ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. _/_/_ Y. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. Z. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shalt have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner. AA. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _I_/ visibility. _ 2. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of _/_/ project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. _ Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department. 3. All developments shall submit an 8 Y" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant _/_/ developments to the Police Department. _ 13 I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\ZO!)6 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00633StdCond 2-73.doc P276 Design Review ittee discussion and they decided to bring it to the Commission. He said the owner did what they cou remarked that it is not fair to ask them to build a 900 or 1,000 square foot house because of the limits f the lot. He said he would approve the request but it is up to the Commission. He said there is the of sending it back to Design Review. Commissioner Munoz stated the applicant already re~et~the offer to alter the project any further Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, commented that the Commi has only been presented a resolution of approval. He said that if the Commission wishes to de a application then a resolution of denial will have to be brought back to the next meeting for the Co Sion to review and act upon. He said once it is acted upon, it can be appealed. Commissioner Munoz clarified the action. Mot' eFlC~on~by Howdyshell, to deny the Variance request (3-1-1). Staff will ring a resolution of denial to the meeting of February 27, 2008 for signature. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY ABSENT: STEWART -carried DRAT ..,.. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTDRC2006-00635- • ` RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Fbothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for consideration. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 23, 2008 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub area 3, to Mixed Use/Retail (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for consideration. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be forwarded to the City Council forfinal action. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 23, 2008 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00633 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING -The request to develop a 166-unit apartment complex on 10.5 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (the associated General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications propose a Mixed Use District), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and west side of Center Avenue. APN: 1077- 601-02, 03, and 04. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 23, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes E~H i B IT B February 13, 2008 CG 3-S o8 P277 Tom Grahn; Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He reported that he received several phone calls from persons that misunderstood the noticing; they believed there had been prior meetings on the project for which they did not receive notice. He clarified that this is the first public hearing held by the City for this project. He said in addition, the mailing radius was expanded to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the project boundaries for the notices. He said he had received two letters and a petition with 57 signatures opposing the project. Commissioner Howdyshell noted that on Exhibit A, that 17 neighbors are directly affected by the project along the north boundary. She asked for the height of the north boundary wall. Mr. Grahn reported that it is a 6 foot block wall along the north project boundary. He added that the developer will be required to work with the property owners to eliminate the "double wall condition." He said the wall would be built on the project boundary not on the neighbors' property. Commissioner Howdyshell referred to Exhibit B and asked for the height of the units along the north boundary. Mr. Grahn stated they are single-story. Commissioner Howdyshell asked if the parking is opened or assigned. Mr. Grahn stated that because there are garages, it is likely those will be assigned to the tenants and then there will be some open parking as well as guest parking spaces. Vice Chairman Fletcher remarked that this is an affordable housing project and he asked counsel to comment on the State requirements. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, said that the City has certain obligations noted in the General Plan and required by the State. He said the Housing Element notes that we are to provide land and space for a variety of housing types. He said by charge of the California Association of Governments, all types of housing should be developed in each community to maintain a balance of economy. He said that we still need to develop this type of housing in order to meet the target required by State law. He noted that the Redevelopment Agency has had a great role in the development of Victoria Gardens and 20% of the revenues received from that must be used towards the development of affordable housing. He added that the State legislature has determined that there is a critical housing problem and that California has the most expensive housing in the nation and that there is a lack of affordable housing. He said the legislature adopted statutes to compel cities to provide and approve affordable housing. He noted that affordable housing projects can only be denied if 1) the city has already achieved their required share of affordable housing units or 2) if the project would create significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated. He remarked that there are other laws that also limit the ability to deny these projects and fines/penalties and attorney fees can be imposed. He said the City and the Redevelopment Agency are under pressure to develop this type of housing. Tony Mize, Workforce Homebuilders LLC, 8300 Utica Avenue, Suite 173, said they have worked on this project for about 3 years. He then gave a powerpoint presentation. He commented that the project meets or exceeds the quality of anything built in the last five years and will exceed all new standards for "green" building instituted in 2007. He said the project would meet or exceed the fire codes. He noted that the intersection of Church Street and Hermosa Avenue is considered substandard and that as part of the development, a new intersection signal will be installed. He noted that for noise mitigation, units along Foothill Boulevard will have plexiglass installed. He said construction noise will most likely occur for about 15 months. He added that the development also pays school fees that are used by the school district to build facilities. He said that with the layout of Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 13, 2008 P278 the project, the two-story units are far enough away that someone will not be able to see into the back yards of the single-family homes to the north. Commissioner Howdyshell commented that she would like to see smart controls added that conserve water used for maintaining the landscape. She said she is glad to see that the development is using low flow showers and toilets. Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing. Rhonda Carter, 7740 Center Avenue, commented that the notice for tonight's meeting was the first she had received. She expressed concern that her backyard would be visible from the workforce units. She expressed concern about water usage. She said that many of the residents will have more than two cars and that there is not enough parking. She said the schools are novas close as depicted on the exhibit and that she is concerned about "stray" teenagers. She said the line of sight will be blocked by development and that could be dangerous for drivers and pedestrians. She said there is a lack of open space for that many units. She said the garages would be targets for thieves and there would be a crime problem. She said she had never been asked to sign a petition so obviously not everyone was asked to sign. Eddie Lakkees, 9086 Hillside Road and Robbie Lakkees, 6818 Darby Court, stated they own the Twins nightclub and the property immediately to the west of the club. They said they would consider the idea of redeveloping their property in the near future. They expressed support for the proposed project and said Mr. Mize is doing a great job and that they foresee the possibility of working with him in the future. Norm MacKenzie, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, commented that he is tired of those that try to stereotype this type of development as being magnets for undesirables and crime. He expressed support for the project and said it is a quality development. He commented that their leadership agreed that in the next five years, workforce housing would be a major challenge. He said this is a good thing to provide housing closer to places of employment which will minimize freeway congestion and will help employees get to work safely. He added that 30 years ago Rancho Cucamonga was far more affordable than it is now. He said the business community supports local control and that this project is good for the community overall. Sharon Capella, 7994 CenterAvenue, a 30 year resident, expressed displeasure forthe Twins bar. She stated that they awaken her at 2:00 a.m. night after night. She commented that there are other available sites in the city that could be used for affordable housing. She said single-family homes do not mix well with apartment living. Dan Aylworth, 10259 Stafford Street, said the noticing for the hearing was irregular. He objected the change in zoning to Mix Use. He said shame on us for not dealing with our quota for low income housing before it came to this. He objected for reasons of increased traffic. He objected to the project because the single-family homes will have a view of three-story rooftops. He added that there are safety concerns regarding crime and that Stafford Street will be used for egress from the project. He complained that his tract has no sidewalks or street lighting and that they are the "forgotten ones." He said the current zoning of the property should be left as commercial and that we should respect that and not "change the game." He said there would be an increased demand on all the utilities and water. He suggested that if the developer make all the units single-story and keep the trees and mature landscaping, and remove the fence, then he would support the project. Vice Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 13, 2008 P279 Commissioner Howdyshell commented that we do not always have our choice and that we have to look at the mandates and needs of the community. She said when there are mandates in place we have to think smart and build smart. She added that the project is close to public transportation. Commissioner Munoz commented that we are fortunate to have the Redevelopment Agency and that we have reaped many benefits as a City from their efforts. He said we cannot be limited to just building places such as Victoria Gardens, we also have to have affordable housing. He noted that the rise in prices has priced many out of our community. He added that crime has gone down per 1,000 residents which is a 39% decrease. He said the State requires us to build a certain number of affordable units and we have less than'/: of that goal. He said if we do not do this, the State could do it for us and we would lose control. He said there have been great improvements made to the project design and that it meets the Code for parking requirements. He said the developer has worked with the Design Review Committee and the design meets all the requirements. He recommended approval of all facets of the project subject to final approval by the City Council. Commissioner Wimberly had no comment. Vice Chairman Fletcher expressed appreciation to the residents that presented their views and concerns. He commented that the City does not have much leeway in this matter other than to do its best to get a quality project and see that it remains as such. He reported that he had recently visited 8 different communities of this type and that without exception were all nice, quiet and affordable. He said most have a 1-10 year waiting list. He said there is a huge demand and need for this type of housing. He said people have to qualify to move in. He commented that it is difficult for the developers to build these in Rancho Cucamonga because the property/land value is so high, that they are hard to pencil out. He said the Redevelopment Agency, (RDA) assists with this. He noted that the developer went with a lower density than what they could have asked for and received. He said that the developer listened to the neighbors concerns. He remarked that water concerns rests with the CVWD, they sign off that they can service these developments. He commented that the units will not be housing multiple families and therefore the parking should be sufficient. He reiterated the need for affordable housing as emphasized by the Chamber of Commerce representative. He said this development may have a mix of people including young couples/families and the elderly. He commented that Planning has not received any calls from the neighbors regarding noise issues from the Twins club. He suggested the neighbors let the Planning Department know if that is occurring. He remarked that the irregular noticing of the meeting was not intentional nor intended to deceive anyone that there was a problem with the newspaper advertising. He commented that the western portion of the property is not for consideration tonight and that any plans for that property will be presented at a later date. He noted that there will be more traffic on Foothill Boulevard with the new development and that as noted in the EIR, can be mitigated and that the installation of the new traffic signal will improve the traffic conditions. He added that the development should not contribute to crime and that there is often more crime in open vacant lots/areas and older neighborhoods rather than new development. He commented that new development often forces out that element. He reported that the requirements to become a resident are stiff and that some agreements and checking is done. He commented that all the utilities will be verified. He noted that generally, he does not like to see commercial zoning changed to a residential use but that the need for affordable or senior housing supersedes this. He commented that the City is 90% entitled and that because a piece of property is empty does not mean it is available for this type of development. He said many changes were made to help it be attractive for the neighborhood. Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Howdyshell, to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 and also forwarding the EIR for certification. The Commission also adopted the Resolution approving the Development Review DRC2006-00633 and certifying the EIR with respect to the Development Review. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 13, 2008 P280 AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: STEWART -carried R R # # R PUBLIC COMMENTS Dan Alyworth, 10259 Stafford Street, commented that the developer said as part of his presentation that the apartment units will not see into his backyard and that he wanted that as part of the record. He added that he would be willing to offer his house at fair market value for affordable housing and that he is putting it up for sale. Norm MacKenzie of the Rancho Chamber of Commerce expressed his thanks for approving the project on behalf of the business community. # # R R # ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 4-0-1 to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: Planning Commission Minutes -8- February 13, 2008 .~ N 4~ C~ 0 c~ .,~, ti V a4 O `_. ~ ~- y.. - ~~ ._. a ~i ~ ` s=~ L ~ X .~ b~q c U ~ 0 cn ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o .U ~ "D O ~ O ~ U N ~ Q ~ ~ v O ~ ~ U ~ o O ti ~ N ~ _ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~_ ~ _ X ~ O co i ~ ~ N~ . O ~ U O ~ ~ O ~ ~ L }' - a N ~ ~ ~ + , ~ O ~- .L O ~ ~ ~ O O U C p > ~ ~ ~ N ~. ~ C ~ +r N C ~ O ~ ~ O- o oU m o o ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~- • O ~ Q ~ ~ L O ~- Q O ~o~ ~ ~~, -~ ~~n ~ U o~ L ~ }, o ~' ~ C~ ~(n N~ D° ~ • • ~ • ~~r-~-.~ ~/~ .-. `/ / d ~ N ~~ ~ ~ co ° p ~ ^ ~ ~ ~- v ~~ `° `° Q m ~° ~° H v ^~ }i ~ m e''a c~'a c 'v e°1a ~ ~~ = ~ ~ ~ H N N ~ y •~ (' V ~ rn ca ~~ a 0o a~~ m ~ N L'c ~ ~ ~~ N ~,o~ ~ ~ d ~ ~~ ~ y:C V p ~ • ~ .a ~ ~ d G1 3 V j = Q W ~ N c~ p Y. .0 a p W O ~ .-. 3 ~ ~ ~ y O. N M ~ C N ~O ~ O et et N ~ O ~ to ~C M M t[! ~! ~O ~ ~ r v~- r rMN r MM ^~ ~ _ C Q N ~ d ~ a~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~'' X C p ~+ ~ N ~ ~ V C :a = :d p .~ Y i°- ~ E°- ~ a` a • • • • • • ~J .~ o~ U s 0 ~- -; ~~ ^~ ^~ a 0 ._ ~~ L V 4~ o ~_ ~ °~ .~ O m ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co .~ O ti U ~ ~ • • ~. U iL 0 O • Q. O 0 a~ N • m m L ~ ~ ±- (~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~. .~ a~ ~ ~- U ~ ~ N ~ ~ J • • • ^~ ^~ .F+ .~ V ~"l1 .~ e~. .0 ~~: x._~ Q 0 0 a a~ .~ E 3 :z ._ L ~' C ~ ~ .~ !0 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ti co • 3 0 V ~ ° m ~ri a i a' Z .~ Q d Q ~J •,.~ e~. o~ L .~ L 0 f+ 0 N L f+ J O H 0 3 ~. 0 0 bq .,~ c~ ~lJ ~L V WM W ~3 L Q V .~ ,,~~ r ,~~; L .~ •.+ ~: O .~ .~ Ca U C ~U W w N ~--i X N O •~~ o~ L ~~ • a-=~ Q L ~+-~ U .~ ~ a O ~ C ~ ~ N O . ~ ~'' C ~ ~ O -~ C _.. +~ O .-. N ~ ~ ~ C i U O N ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ O U ~ ~ ~ _ U ' ~ ~ N N ~ ~ _~ ~ o ;},, U • ~ ~ ~ N ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N •~ O ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Q ~ U c~ ~ a a ~ U ~, ~ ~ O c~ c c ~ o ~ ~ w w O Z U ~ _U s ~--~ C O .L 0 L O O L a~-+ .~ ~ L Q ~~ .Q • • • • • • L O (C3 C6 "~ c .~ N .? w O C ca • b~0 .~ v v ~~ v .~ W L L ~--+ ._ O a~ _~ U .~ .~ L 0 ~~ ._ U 0 N C6 a~ N a~ .~ L W O U ~L ~..L C6 .~ L 0 C~ U to N O U .~ .M W a~ .~ a U C N L O ._ -~-~ .~ .~ ^~ W O U ~_ 0 0 N N U U c~ .v ~--+ U .~ ca c 0 E ca U U 0 U ~~/ L.L a~ .~ ~4 .~ C~ f+ d V .~ U .~ c~ L ~--+ ~--+ ._ Q. .~ a~ .~ O U C6 C~ • N U c~ .~ -~ -~-.+ .~ 0 .~ .~ .~ U W • .~ U N C O N U U 0 U t6 .L d. • 0 .~ O ._ N LL brp .,~ v 0 a x _-_ r `x ~ r1~9W11 ~ 9 8 a ~~ ElmhurtA Aw ~ ~ CambidgrAw FMS ~ ~ 'kM Mal Aea~ y < E JS any atl~d avy 3 ~7 .7~ ^uowsy Pavuo ~~ ~ ~ `3~ ° 7 W O ~~~ ~ L ~ A ~°r P~ ~~ ArcAibald r U V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~- }'~U~ ~ o ~ -~ ~ ~ ~=~a~ ~ o c~ .~ ~ to ~ O ~ ~_ > ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q ~ ~ • E m SL a O ~ G~ c`~ '6 4 (.~' ~ ~ u V ffrvar Ave 0 N L 6 Dewnvhie ~ c Gnter6ury R abpgwr~ a`Y b rrrowrd pwrrrrb any ~ uoPuol 31 '^ E ~Mdven 4 s L a = Ave g 5 ~ _ ~ any Apun6urg U L ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ '~ ~ o ~ o ._ U ~ O ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ' ~ cn in ~ c~ • ~ ~~ i ~~ ~--+ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-' ~ ~ ~ X . ~ O - ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N _ J U ~ • ~ _ ~ • ~l •,.~ o~ c~ f+ ^~ L .~ W c~ 3 a~i a .~- a~ a~ ~ _ a~ .~ c ~o •~ ;,_. ~~ c a~ bq .~ o~ c~ v N 0 U L 3 0 m .~ 0 0 a~ 0 m °o 0 bq .,~ o~ O 0 0 U L ~~ ~ L O ~ ^~ Q O lQ O T z i 0 r z w ~4 .~ o~ ~' .~ "~ N _ V O ~ N U •~ ~ L L ~ N °o °' ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ - v ~ c ~ ~ ~ o p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W V t ~ 2 O C ~ O . C ~ ~ ~ ~ U - o • o s O N v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O _ r v V t!1 a 0 ~ ~ t ~ -~ a ~ v ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ co , _ ._ N • C ~ N ~ 9 Q ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~' .~ O O N f+ .~ 1 _. ---- ,. 1 1 •. j .JQTVM MNmlIM ' EAST 1 ; 1 . ' ETIWMIW ~~ 1 W 1 1Jp 1 ( 1 QQ n,~ , 1 O 2 1y yL 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ` 1 ' 1 IL 1 0 1 1~ 1 Fy` 1 IA4N/ ~ FF 1 1 G IdM10M 1 1 1 1 1 1 11ETI/V6T 1 1 BEp1l 1 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~~- ~~~ ~~~ ;i~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~z a~~ ~} ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ •~~ ~~~N ~~~ W ~ 1 N 1 ' <- - 1 f'~ ~ ' YOMII~Il~ - - - -1 i,;J ~, 1 1 1 IRDIO A-O 1 . YlNtlY1NY~ 191YiM~0Y 1 Sl1 1 1 1 Y{11QN 1 ~~ 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 IIMIEM ~ 1 1 111110611 ~ 1 ~~ 1 1B{!Mp ~ 1ELLIWW 1 1 / 1 1 . f'~ 1 1 ~ W 1 6MR1116 ~ ~ . 1 1®IV6 1 ~ , ~~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ 3//~~O011WU ~F+~ 1 ~! : < ~ '~~~ ~~ : ~~~w~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ O • ~~~~ ~~- O ~- pmt ~ ~ .~~ =ar p ;~L°~'3 ~' C~ 6~Occ0 L ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ Q~ ~ a.~Q~ ~ w oo vc, aa~x•- ~aca~c~ ~ L ON s ~ •- w _~~ v .N N~ ~ ~' . ~ ~ ~ C+~ M= CCU ~~ ~~a~~~-~ ~cnoiSa~ ~O tO00~~r~000 f-~ 3~ vU HMS 3~ ^~ 0 Z L O 3 0 a~ ._ O U L (~. (~ ~ ~ C ~ = 0 L a~ ~ ~ ~ U U ~ ~ U~ L ~~ O v p Y L Q ~ ~ N V~ L.L 3 .c~o o ~~'~ ~ U~~ O •~ ~ O ~ j (~ 0 0~~ 3 ~~,~ ~ .C j ~ O • • -+-~+ O U vi ~--~ Q U L 0 c 0 "~ L m ~~ c~ ''^~ VJ ~ ~ ~ }' '~-' ~ C U c~ ~ ~ '~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ cv ~ s~ ~ L O ~ ~ }' ~~~ N ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ > ° ~~ ~~~ :~ ~ 7+ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ^' W O 0 ~ Q `~V 0 ~ ~ O o U~ ~ ~~ ° ° ~ 4~ ~ ~ c ~ . c ~ -~ c n o ~ U~ ~ ~ Q- (~ NN ~L ^ •--~ • • • U U 0 s U L U (B N O N U (B w U O L fa 0 U 0 L U C (C ~' f+ ~ W '~'~ 1 ~ O O ~ ~--+ 0 ~ L .~ ^• ^• (/~ o ~ ~ L • ,~, C3 0 *~ t Q 0 N .. f+ +~ ~ ~ d ~ Q d ~ ~ ~ ~ N _ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ c~ O ~ ~ • 0 c~ z 0 a~ ~' c~ C6 a~ 0 • ~ ~ _ o 0 ~- z ~ ~, ~ o ~ ~ > ~ -~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a~ o c~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~= C6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ._ o N C~ V ~ •- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~, ~ }. o0 00 wo~;w_~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 00 00 0~ U ~ ~U JU • • .~ 0 ~~: ~~~ .~_ r ,, ~+ ~ ~--+ W U 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~ U ~ '~ O L ~ ~ ~ ~ a. }' O ~ L V ~ ._ .~-~ !~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ +-+ ~ > .~ U ~ O •'' ~ L Q. • L ~--+ C~ c 0 N N V O C ~L a~ a~ 0 a~ CD ~-- .U L W .~ U N C O ca U U 0 U C~ .~ c~ • CC5 L 0 .~ O W I..L bq .~ v U .r .~ 3 O U ~.+ f+ N V .; ~. d t/1 • O ~-:+ 0 ~.~.. .~ 2 0 L Q O 2 • ~ ~ •~ O L Q O ~ow ~ N O ~ ~U ~ ~ - cn (CS ~ ~ ,~ ~z ~ ~o~ O U -~ O W ~~ • O ^^L 1 • 0 Q. 0 L r M • U a~ 0 .~ N • L ~ ~~ L U ~ L ~ ~ °~ ~U a~ ~ L '~/~ /1 U ~ ~ ~ T • ~1 .~ O U ._ c~ ~+ .~ 0 ._ N ._ 0 • co c 0 c~ U U 0 U C~ .~ a~ ca a~ • L U L a--r 0 ._ O O c c~ 0 • L 0 O U c~ ~_ ~U ti N .~ ~ ~ a~ .- ~ ~ O ~ ~.._ ~U • N N C (6 a~ 0 O O O c~ 0 N C O ca m c 0 E c~ U U 0 U c~ .~ .,~ 0 V J `~ J ~ ~ ~ L U ~L ~ N .~ Q X d' ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ,',_, ~ W ~ 4) p ~ ~ -~ _ ~ ~ ~, ~, Q ~ ~ o ~- Q V L N ~,- O ~ ~ W o ~ - ~ L c~ o ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ao r-U W ~ • • • .-. 00 N M O `-' M ~ b,,0 N 0 .~ 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ ~ ~ Q ~' ~ ~ o W Q ~ ~ ~ o w U ~ ~ j o • • ~ .~ L 0 L ~-~+ O ~U ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ +~ ' _ ~--~ • ~ •--+ L .~ -~ c 0 ~- ~ ~ ~ a~ c~ -~ U .~ a o~ L .~ c~ .~ v- ~ ~ •--~ (~ ~~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~, ~ ~ ~ o ~ U ~ L O ~ U O ~ ~ ~, U ~- ~= o o ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ o ~ U U c~ c 0 x a~ .~ v f~ =:r ^ ~ U = U ~ . L v v O O 0 N N d V H C w N~ N N ~ r N ~` O N `~ N ~ ti eN- O t~ ~ N 00 1~ ~ ~ tG ~!'f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ f Q1 O Of Q Q c~ M N N N~ 2 Z Vi Vi fR !R V} Vl fA ~ C C N tq C C ~ N C C y ~ N ~ ~ N E a a a o. n. a c ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ M ~ M ~ M .O d .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .. ~ 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 m O O m m m m m m m m a 0 m m m m m m m m ~ M N M N M N M N r C O O O O o 0 0 ~ m N ~ M la0 ~ M ~. N ~ ~ ..~ w. C to ~ C to ~ C to ~ _ 3 'O ~ :~ ~ 'd ~ = w ~ V m ~ v r ~ v . ~ v . ~ w .. • .. ~ .- ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ o L 4 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1p v~ liil Iy ~ ~' ~-''• W 0 0 ~~ SJ Q 3 -I~ S v ~~ ]~ 0 0 SJ v 0 0 s 0 .~ s ..~ Z V/ ^~ ^W W ~~ 0 .~ O U ^V, W . - n~ W a c~ V O J t' _` ~. ~ ~.~- s _ - ~f _ nnu T~ ~ ~ ,a ~~ ~a s ~ ~ ~~ ~ :~ ~ c U ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ _ c U p U ~ a~ L Q 0 N ~ O L ~ .~? N U o ~ ~ O ca U U O v L O a X W D ~ O ~ > ~ ~ ~ '~ U D ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O (a V V O v U c ~ .j, ~ ~ = ~ W c c~ (t3 Q o ~ U ~~ !j ~ ~ ~ c ~ a~ '~"i N ~ ~ ~ cA ~ U p ~ L ^,, W ~ ~ .,?~ ~ ~ U a ~ OC ~ ~ C~ V m U A A A A A A A A A A 1 ~'" m c , d ~ m °~ L ~ O W ~ N G1 ~ ti O U °o N 0 • • ^• V~ 1 ---F--~ ~ }r W 0 ~ U~ ~ Q C6 ~ ~ , _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ L T U ~+ C6 '~' ~ ~ ~ O ~ O~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 4 ''~^^ _ ^ vI v ' ^ v• v• ~ O • --~ ~_ ~ ~ _ ~ ^~ ~ ~ ~m ~ S ~ a~ ~ U~ ~ QO i 1 U ~ ~ U (CS C ~ C ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'ca ~ ~ O ~ nL `~' (~ L C N .L ~--+ W .V ca 0 U U .> ~--+ Q O ca Cn _~ '^~ V J -1--+ ~ ~ - C~ • • • • • ~ C •= c~ U ~ a~ ~ ~ o ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ .~~ .._.~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° - a~ ~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ U a .U ~ ~ ~ O N ~ N ~ aj N «_~ ~ ~- ~ Q ~ N U •- CQ U O ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Cif ~ Q ~ . N ~ ~ ~ W O .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ v ~ ~ ~~ ~" ~ ~ .L ~ o ~ ~ ~'~ o ~ L ~ ~" ~ ~ o ~ c a~ ~ c~ .~ ~ cOn ~ ~ ~ ~ .C ~ c c~ o c a~ ~ c~ o ~ c~ ~~ ~ a ~ '}'r C (~ ~ V ~ -~ C O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ O O O O O O ~ O O .i .~ O U a~ 0 0 (~ N N W ca. L M~ W r. ,;;;'_.i ': ~ Q ~,_. ^ L ~~ Q 4 i A~ 4 \~ Q v° ~v -I..i v ca ~~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~m U~ ~ ~' U a o~ ~~ V L ``O^^ v/ 0 Cn L ~- N O c~ a~ a~ L C~ V O +~ ~. ~ N ~~ ~ ~ .~ ~ (n c~ ~~ o~ W ~-. ~~ o ~- 0 .~ V v 0 c~ 0 C~ r M 0 c~ a~ 0 M C~ C~ -~-~ N N O L O 0 N 00 O C'7 O o O N O ' w ^ 1 ^ ~\ ~ CV O ~ ~' o0 ~ ~ - L N _ ~ ~ .~ o ~ I d. U n ~ ~ ~ o0 ., O Cn ~ V ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O v N U ~ ~ ~ O ~ L. ~ o ~ ~ O ~ o cn ~ = v }' O ' ' ~ O Ca W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ Q ~ ~ L ~_ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~' cn U ~ O ~ - ~' LL O ~ ~ ~ ~ _ .. U ~ O O 00 p 0 ~ ,~ • • • Z • • ^~ }^~+ W W L ~ ~"~ I ~_ L ^, ~ ~ W ~ Q Q V W V ^~ L W •O ~I- -1-+ ~ ^, W ~ ~ L.. 0 o -- o ~ U~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~, ._ _ .- a~ .~ _ ~ I-- ~~ ~ ~ .~ -i-~ -}--+ .~ .~ 4~ .~ a~ .~ L a~ U_ 0 .~..~ W L .~ ~--+ V •~--+ L .~ a~ v ~L ~--+ 0 ~--+ ~~.+ L Q~ ~. c~ c~ 0 .~ O c~ 0 00 'c n ~~ C71 C N C~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ c cv 3 a--+ N N U L 0 W N O U `~ (~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ -- ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ N U ~ . ~ V ~ ~ 00 N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~? O ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 X cI~ v~ ._ ~ ~ - ~ - ?~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 U ~ ~ .U .~ U N U ._ L Cn O Ca L 0 ._ N Cl) 0 • W ~}~ 4~ 0 a~ ._ 07 C~ .~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ._ C~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ C6 V > .- L o~ ~: .? U 0 L a. C~ a~ ._ U a~ • a~ U .~ L U ~' O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ M N ~ O ti O N ~~~i H 0 0 N O O O M O O N N _';; O ~', O O ~~ . N O O r ~ N ~ r O O O r M 00 r" ~ ~ M 00 00 N 00 ~ r' O~0 ~ O ~ O .~ ~_ R ~ J ~ ~"~ J V) _ •- N ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~:` . ~ A ~ _ _- m ~ O L a y_ _ _ ~.;~` 1~, s ? ,~. t . _.. t: '' ,.f ~J , Gam, ~~ -~~ q.~ l , t ~,. ~,.: ,.. i- . ~~ . ~ "!~ ~~~ r ~_ 1 `, _- ~ ` ~' ~~ ~ ~ .~ I • T~ Q 4~ t~ c~3 ,-~ W 0 0 N ~' N c~ w . r.., ~ ~ U ~ ~ O aA ~~ ~ ~ V a~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ O a ~ ~ ~ ~ U ^, 3 ~~ ~~~ ~ w O • ^1 ~l •N U •~ ~ q~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o °' `~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ '~ °' o ~ ~ ~~ ~, o '~ ~ o ~ ~ °' o ~ ~ ~' `~v rtv ~' N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n `~ ~l W O •~ O ~~ ~ ~^ ~~ ~_ .,~ °o '~ 0 .,~ .,~ v 0 0 '~ ~~' •~ ~] V` V U .,~ ~^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .b4 • ~ v ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~' `ti ~ v •~ ~~ ~ o •~ ~ Cn ~ ~--~ -~ ~ ~ ~ 4) a~ a~ U ~ ~ ._ ~- ~ ~ v w Q ~ ~ ~o 00 UN U .~ 0 0 ._ C~ U a~ .~ ._ '~ Q a~ a~ L 0 w ^L W Ca c~ Q C~ a~ .~ U •-+ ^~ W ^~ W i ~O ~ ~ ~' W ca _~ U O U a~ 0 0 0 .~ a~ Z 0 3 0 .~ C N U C (~ L C W c~ 0 a~ 0 L.. 0 I..L ._ 4) c~ U .~ 0 a~ X w ., W U .~ O O ._ -~-~ ._ .U 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 a~ V c~ .~ O a~ ca c~ ~ ~ • 0 ~ U .'-' -_ U O U C C O U U ~ ~ ~ _ _~ O V L 0 L _~ .~ .~ .~ ~_ _ ~ ~ > +~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ,. ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O m ~ U O V ~ ~ -~-+ •~ ~ .~ c~ U O ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ •• = t"~ '~ O ~ U - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O _ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ -~ to O ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ O ~ 4'- ~ '~ O (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N .~ O ~ ~ v _ ~ _~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ .~ _~ ~ N ~ U +~ O N ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_. a ~U C6 ~ Q ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ .U ~O p ~ ~ W W 0 .~ C ~ / ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ L ' ~. C6 C ~';:~', ,~ .;,`. J + _ .~ , ~,:; ;>y'~;; r~',:' oz A _ ~. Q a. o w ~Q ., _~ , QQz ¢°o w~oc~oQ ~~Z OVZp~W ¢~a ~ZQz° ~g~ w ~. - ~~~~~ ~¢~ Vww ~~~ i" W Q ,t` . cn J ,~, a d v R d ~~4. Y d ` ~ , 3 O O 0 o ~ N o L C ~ U .~ ~ ~ a •~ W O o ~ ~ N ~" ~ z ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ c cn Cv ~ '~ a~ ~ °~ U L ~,. ~ >, a v w .. .. .: y 0 ^L I..L ~ ~ O L i--+ O N ~ O O O O U ~ U ~ •~ i C w w a~ w O ~ ai ° U c o ~ U 'v~~i a~ v~ Y ~ o ~ ~ c N v a m O O ~ fn U c c L ~ ~. m c~ a~ cn O o ~ c ~ .~ c O .~ O ~ ~ ~ Q O c c .c ~ v m ca c~ ~- c ~ ~ a a °o ~ v~ w w w o a (6 L ^L I..L 0 ._ ~--+ U a~ ._ C~ .~ ._ E Q .~ a--+ .~ L a~ -_ ~U O U ~~ O O y- 0 4) .~ a~ as ~. O U a~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ c~ ~ C6 O a~ 0 a~ ~~ ._ U~ a~ ~ ~ c~ O ~ .O CCS ~_ 0 U N ,~ a~ 0 a~ .~ ~~ ._ .~-~ C~ ._ ca ._ .~ U c~ .~ .~ U ~~ m ~ . ~ ~ •- ~~ Q ._ ~ X ~~ ~_ ~ -- 0 ._ a~ V .~ 0 ~, N N L 3 a~ .~ 0 N C L Q~ L L V .~~ ~, ~-_ ~ 'c~ O `}" U .~ .~ 0 U O as ca 0 ca .o c~ .~ .~ c~ o ~~ .~ O .~ a~ ~ C ~ ~.~ ~ O•C OLO ~ U ~ L ~ ~ 3 ~ ++ O> ~~.~ ~°V ~ oo ~a~ (~" c ~ ~ ~ .c ~ cn L o cv ~ c~ O O •~ L N C "L •O ~ Q- C O O •C •O.. ~ ~ a~ 'a c a~ w ~ Q c •v~ ~~r ~ N ~ ~ c~ S a> > ~ 3 co a ~ N_ a~ d C 'C U ~. ~..~ O? ~ N O V 3 ~•~ C '~ a~ ~ ~ ~ .9 c -v~ ~a~ ~ •~c ~Oa~ 3 C V ~U Q N C ` d` S ~ O ~ O +~+ N O E N O N ~ C~ O U O ~~ O O~ O ~N -p "O Q UW ~ ~ v Q c vti ~~ ,Qc~ Z O C CO ~~ ~O ~ NO ~, ~N ~~ `O~ O~ ~oU ~ ~a"' aI~ co p.c ~ cat U '''' }' U~ :wU a~~ ~`~ ~ ,ooh ~ , C ~~ (~- ~N ~ O c ~ ~.. ~O tC tqU ~.O•V ~NC C ~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~ O C ~~~ O 'Q~ b~ ~(6 CN ~ ~~N S C CO OUO ,CE ~O = NL L O (~ O ~ N O O 'O~N ~~+ ~ _ 'CSC UJ y+r ON _ ~~ LO `. ~°~ ~~ Zorn a~i~ ~' ~~~ ao ~ Lo ~V o°c' c~~ ~o ~~ ~~rn o~ _~ ~~~ ~ .~.Q 3 O vi .w c ~ ~ c W~ ~~ c O~ O~~ Omo ~c O ~-p~N Q N V N ;_• ~ .. ~~ 1 N~ r o~-- CcN SON N ~ ~m~N ~.,- `goo ~o~ ~a~ o~ a~ ~oo~ ~o ~Ua Qcn~ ~~ ~O 3 v)~U~ 0 ~- .. O C6 0 L 0 (a C O U U 0 U c~ ~+- O U 0 .~ .> ._ D a~ a~ U 0 w N O U 4) .~ L a~ U U .~ ._ U 0 O 0 0 00 x 0 m 0 a: ~~ V ~ N c~ .~ O ._ t~ U (~ C O U U 0 U C (a I 1 N ti N 0 .. a~ O a. P281 EXHIBIT C DRAFT FINAL EIR FOR WFH PROJECT DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER CG 3-S-off P282 RESOLUTION NO. D S-o 5S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals 1. Rancho Workforce Housing filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 23, 2008, and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 08-04 recommending approval by the City Council. 3. On March 5, 2008, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, PartA, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on March 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories, Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences; the property to the west is designated General Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with existing commercial and residential uses; the property to the east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. "*' DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 an automotive service station and industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated General Commercial and is developed with restaurant, day care, and office uses. c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the related development; and and This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and the proposed project master plan complies with current development code standards regulating building setback, building height, parking and landscaping; and b. That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, the proposed project was designed to be sensitive to existing adjacent land uses, and the project Environmental Impact Report was prepared to address and mitigate potential environmental impacts; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The City Council makes the following findings under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act: a. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines"), the City prepared an Initial Environmental Study (the "Initial Study') for the Project. The Initial Study concluded that there was substantial evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact on several specifically identified resources, including air quality, noise, and traffic. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, and based upon information contained in the Initial Study, the City ordered the preparation of an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. On October 1, 2007, the City prepared and sent a Notice of Preparation of the EIR to responsible, trustee, and other interested agencies and persons in accordance with Guidelines Section 15082(a) fora 30-day review period. The City circulated the Draft EIR to the public and other interested parties fora 45-day review period from November 15, 2007 through December 31, 2007, consistent with the 45-day public comment period required by Guidelines Section 15087(c) and 15105. During this public comment period, the City received six (6) written comment letters regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR. The City also received an additional two (2) letters after the 45-day review period, for a total of eight (8) written comment letters. The City prepared written responses to all the comment letters received on the Draft EIR in accordance with Public Resources Code §21092.5 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15088. P283 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. •"** DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 3 b. The City Council is the decision-making body for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. For purposes of making its recommendations on these applications, the City Council has received and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") forthe Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with the oral and written testimony received thereon during the hearing prior to any action on the Project. Based on that review, the City Council hereby certifies that the FEIR was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and the Guidelines and that it adequately addresses the impacts and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-0635, the Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Development Review DRC2006-00633, and all other approvals necessary to carry out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The City Council further finds that that the modifications to the FEIR that have been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. c. The City Council finds that based on the FEIR, additional public comments, and the written and oral staff report, and Exhibit A to this Resolution, that the Project will not cause significant environmental impacts except with respect to interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year 2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With respect to all of these potentially significant impacted areas and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to less than significant. d. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR, and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific changes and alterations required are contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of the Project as explained in Exhibit A to this Resolution. The City Council finds that the mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant environmental effects of the Project. e. The City Council finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill the basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required no project alternative, the reduced intensity alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative, and the off-site location alternative. For the reasons explained in Exhibit A, the alternatives identified in the FEIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much lesser degree, and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the City Council finds that each of the alternatives is determined to be infeasible. f. The City Council further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt each of the mitigation measures set forth in the FEIR and incorporate those measures into the Project. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council adopt the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in Appendix F of the FEIR and incorporated herein by reference. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval. P284 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. "*"* DRC2006-00635-RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 4 g. The custodian of records for the FEIR, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review ih the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, including Exhibits B and C and in accordance with the condition listed below: Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. P285 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P286 EXHIBIT A TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUINCIL RESOLUTION NO. OS "' Findings and Facts in Support of Findings I. Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that will occur if a project is approved or carried out unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Rancho Workforce Housing Project. These findings are based upon evidence presented in the record of these proceedings, both written and oral, the FEIR and all of its contents, the Comments and Responses to Comments on the FEIR, and staff and consultants' reports presented to the City Council. II. Project Objectives As set forth in the FEIR, the objectives of the project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: A. Locate development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts; B. Provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community; C. More fully utilize the availability of existing public improvements, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public; D. Augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City; and 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P287 E. Promote balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an Initial study to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation, certain impacts of the Project were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study, and were not analyzed in the Draft EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural Resources; (C) Biological Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (D) Cultural Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (E) Geology and Soils; (F) Hazardous and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (H) Land Use and Planning; (I) Mineral Resources; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Recreation; and (M) Utilities. IV. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Less Than Significant, and Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A general biological resources assessmenUfield study was conducted as part of the Initial Study to aid in the determination that the following issue areas would result in a less than significant impact.. However, there still remains the potential for a significant impact to result to the following issue areas. As a result, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. A. Biological Resources Burrowing Owl The Project site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously used for agricultural purposes. Because of this, there is a lack of suitable habitat on the Project site and no probability for the occurrence of any sensitive species except with regard to the burrowing owl. Although the probability of the occurrence of the burrowing owl is low, the EIR has identified a mitigation measure to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: BIO-1: A precondition survey for the burrowing owl is required to confirm presence or absence of the species on the proposed project site. The pre-construction survey for the burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to the commencement of grading activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall not be required. 11231-OOOI\]031054v3.doc P288 BIO-2: Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated prior to the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be conducted per applicable California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not be permitted during the nesting season for this species. b. Facts in Support of Findings Currently, the northwest and center portions of the proposed project site provide marginally suitable habitat for the burrowing owl. Although a Field Study was conducted as part of the Initial Study, apre-construction survey for the owl is required to confirm the presence or absence of the owl from the site to avoid impacts to any owl(s). Vegetation in these areas is low to moderate in height and interspersed with debris piles, thus providing a potential for owl occupancy. Vegetation within the northeastern portion consists of remnant vineyards, overgrown with ruderal vegetation. This portion of the project site would provide marginally suitable habitat as well, should conditions change (i.e., with vegetation removal). The burrowing owl is a mobile species; therefore, apre-construction survey is required to ensure no impact to burrowing owls that may occupy the proposed project site. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less . than significant. 2. Raptors The Project site contains a few large ornamental trees which could be suitable roosting or nesting trees for raptors. During the field survey conducted as part of the biological resources assessment conducted as part of the Initial Study, no nest for raptors were observed. However, because raptors are mobile and there is the possibility that nests may have been established during the period since the Initial Study, there is the potential for a significant impact. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure articulated below, any impact will be reduced to less than significant levels. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels`. BIO-3: Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1 and January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre- construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas. b. Facts in Support of Findings Because any raptor nests in the trees located on the project site may have been established after the Initial Study field survey, there is the potential for a significant impact with regard to raptors. However, with the incorporation of the above identified mitigation II231-000]\]031054v3.doc P289 measure, any impact will be reduced to a less than significant level. The mitigation measure specifies the pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted, and that removal of trees shall be limited to the period outside the nesting season for raptors. Further, the mitigation measure requires that a qualified biologist be contacted if raptor nests or nesting birds are located. These measures will ensure a less than significant impact. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the Project site. Further, through compliance with Senate Bill 18 which requires notification of the Project to potentially affected Native American Tribes, only one Tribe responded indicating that there was no knowledge of any specific cultural or sacred resources on the site. Nevertheless, the potential to uncover an archeological resource may be present. Findings Changes or alterations have. been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-1: In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find shall be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archeologist (meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. b. Facts in Support of Findings Although the site is located in a developed area where significant ground disturbance has occurred, the potential may still exist to uncover an archeological resource. With the incorporation of the above identified mitigation measure, any impact to an archeological resource will be less than significant. Specifically, it any archeological resource is found, any ground-disturbing activities will be relocated and a qualified archeologist will be consulted. Further, the archeological resource will be recorded and/or removed per City and State regulations. This will ensure that any impact is reduced to a less than significant level. 2. Paleontological Resources The project site is located in an area containing extensive existing development. The development of the existing roadway, curbs, sidewalks, infrastructure, and nearby structures would have required a large amount of ground disturbance that would have likely resulted in the discovery of or destruction of existing paleontological resources. While there have been no paleontological resources recorded within the City and the project area has previously been disturbed, the potential to uncover a paleontological resource may still be present. a. Findings 4 11?31-0001\]031054v3.doc P290 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-2: In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the vicinity of the discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations for further mitigation. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, any potential impact on paleontological resources will be less than significant. The measure will ensure that any excavation of the Project site will be halted when paleontological resources are encountered and that a qualified paleontologist be consulted, thereby ensuring a less than significant impact. C. Hydrology and Water Quality 1. Structures Other than Residential in 100-year Flood Hazard Area Because a portion of the Project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area, and because a small portion of Hermosa Avenue (adjacent to the Project site) is prone to flooding, there is the potential for a .significant impact to result. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, any potential impact will be less than significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") a Conditional Letter of Map Revision -Fill (CLOMR-F) to remove property from the 100-year flood zone map. HYD-2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and requirements including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro- modification impacts. b. Facts in Support of Findings The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) identify areas subject to 100-year flooding. An area along Hermosa Avenue is shown within the 100-year flood hazard area on the FIRMS. The conceptual plan for 5 11231-0001\]031054v3.doc P291 the western portion of the project site includes commercial, office space, and a restaurant. The structures associated with the western portion of the project site may fall within the 100-year flood hazard area. Proper storm drainage facilities shall be constructed on the project site as part of the drainage plans to be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and City Engineer. Implementation of the features and facilities contained in the approved drainage plan will help to ensure that impacts associated with flooding or redirection of flood water flows are less than significant. In addition, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD-1 and HYD-2, impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant. V. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant A. Noise Impacts Certain noise impacts were studied in the EIR and found to be less than significant. Specifically, noise construction associated with groundbourne vibration was determined to be less than significant, as was the potential for the Project to expose people in the Project area to excessive noise levels based on the proximity to an airport. Further, the Project is not anticipated to cause excessive off-site traffic noise impacts. Although these noise impacts were found to be less than significant, other noise impacts, as articulated below, were found to be significant requiring mitigation. Air Quality Impacts Certain air quality impacts were studied in the EIR and also found to be less than significant. Specifically: (1) the proposed Project is consistent with the most recent Air Quality Management Plan; (2) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to construction emissions, with the exception of fugitive dust articulated below; (3) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to operational emissions; (4) the proposed Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations from architectural coatings; (5) the proposed Project will not impose short-term health risk impacts on sensitive receptors; and (6) the proposed Project will not create objectionable odors. VI. Effects Studied in the EIR But Which Have the Potential to Become Significant, But Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A. Air Quality Fugitive Dust Emissions The proposed Project is not anticipated to have a significant impact with regard to construction related fugitive dust emissions. Nevertheless, to ensure this impact remains less than significant, mitigation measures have been identified. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 6 1 123 ] -0001 U 031054v3.doc P292 4.1.1A During project construction the construction contractor shall implement the following measures to reduce fugitive dust. (A) Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. (B) All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. (C) All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). (D) Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (E) All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically or chemically stabilized. (F) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. 4.1.1 B The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.1.1CThe construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel powered equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible. 4.1.1 D The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.1.1E The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.1.1 F The construction contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. b. Facts in Support of Findings 7 11231-0001\]031054v3.doc P293 Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on aproject-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions at the time of construction. The project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM10 component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. The following are the applicable Rule 403 Measures: • Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). • Water active sites at least twice daily. (Locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). • All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114 (freeboard means vertical space betweeri the top of the load and top of the trailer). • Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road. • Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 mph or less Additional dust suppression measures in the SCAQMD CEQA Air C~uality Handbook are included as Mitigation Measures 4.1.1A through 4.1.1E to ensure that impacts remain less than significant. In sum, through compliance with Rule 402 and 403 as well as the additional measures incorporated as mitigation measures, this impact will be less than significant. VII. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to be Significant, But Reduced to a Level of Insignificance Through Mitigation The following impacts were analyzed in the EIR and found to be significant. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, these impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final EIR (and below) would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level. A. Noise Interior Noise Levels 11231-0001\]031054v3.doc P294 The analysis in the EIR demonstrates that construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the on-site proposed residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.1A Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot-high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor uses, such as patios or park recreation areas with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound wall/beret combination with an effective height of 8 feet. 4.2.1 B Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.1C For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre parcel, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2.1D For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel, restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) unless the proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. b. Facts in Support of Findings The proposed residential uses would potentially be exposed to high traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, mitigation measures are required to ensure that the sensitive receptor locations are not exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the City's standards. Whether or not a specific apartment building is subject to the established mitigation measures depends on the building's location within the project. For residential units within the project site, the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would result in the construction of sound walls and mechanical ventilation. The sound walls would provide a 5 to 7 dBA or more in noise reduction for ground- floor receptors. With a combination of walls, doors, and windows, standard construction for southern California residential buildings would provide more than 20 dBA in exterior-to-interior noise reduction with windows closed and 12 dBA with the windows open. However, with windows open, there is a potential for interior noise on the ground floor units to exceed the 45 dBA Ld„ standard (i.e., 63 dBA - 12 dBA = 51 dBA). Therefore, the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2.1A would be required to ensure that windows can remain closed for a prolonged period of time. Further, with the implementation of all the identified mitigation measures, noise levels would be reduced to a level that would be consistent with the City's General Plan noise standards. Therefore, impacts associated with this issue would be mitigated to level that is considered to be less than significant. 9 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P295 2. Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts Construction noise impacts resulting from the proposed Project will be potentially adverse requiring mitigation. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.2A The construction contractor shall implement the following mitigation measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. 4.2.2B The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4.2.2C The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4.2.2D During all site excavation and grading, the project/ construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. b. Facts in Support of Findings Noise levels from demolition, grading, and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA Lmax at the closest residential uses to the north of the project site for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse. Typical noise levels range up to 91 dBA Lmax at 50 feet during the noisiest construction phases. The site preparation phase, which includes site excavation and grading, tends to generate the highest noise levels, because the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers, dozers, draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full-power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower-power settings. Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. Noise typically associated with the use of construction equipment is estimated between 79 and 89 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from the construction effort for the grading phase. This equipment would be used on site. Each dozer would generate a maximum of 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, and water and pickup trucks would generate approximately 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal 10 11231-0001\I031054v3.doc P296 strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual noise source, the worst-case composite noise level during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lma, at a distance of 50 feet from an active construction area. As these noise sources are point sources, the noise decreases at a rate of 6 d6 per doubling of distance. The nearest residences are located to the north of the project site along Stafford Street. These residences are approximately 25 feet from the project boundary and may be subjected to short-term noise reaching 97 dBA Lmax intermittently generated by construction activities on site. Additionally, demolition of the existing buildings on the western 5-acre parcel may occur after the project apartments are occupied; however, these will be no closer than the existing residences. This level of noise is comparable with vehicular traffic noise on Foothill Boulevard. Construction-related noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse; however, with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. To minimize the impact of the construction noise on residences adjacent to the project area, compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance would be required. Because Construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the closest residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed, the above identified mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. More specifically, by limiting construction hours, using noise mufflers on construction equipment, and placing construction equipment and staging areas away from residential uses, this significant impact will be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3. Long Term Operational Noise Impacts The EIR found that the proposed Project would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels associated with long-term operations of the proposed Project. This significant impact will be reduced to a less than significant level with the imposition of mitigation measures. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.3A For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a residential use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2.3B In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the fire shop, a 6-foot-high wall surrounding the fire shop will be required in order to reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than significant level. b. Facts in Support of Findings 11 11231-0001\]031054v3.doc P297 Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would be associated primarily with operations at the on-site commercial uses. These commercial uses would generate noise from truck delivery, loading/unloading activities, and other activities at the parking lot. These activities are potential point sources of noise that could affect noise-sensitive receptors adjacent to the loading areas, such as the proposed residential uses on site. For example, there is an auto fire shop located on the project site near the center of the Foothill Boulevard frontage that would project noise to the surrounding proposed residences. This business is scheduled to be removed; however, it is possible it will continue operation for some period after the apartment portion of the project is built. Noise sources from the auto fire shop include customer-generated noises as well as noises associated with auto services, such as pneumatic drills, hydraulic lifts, and other machinery or equipment typically used in such operations. It is anticipated that the closest project residences will be located no less than 100 feet from the auto service area. Peak noise levels associated with the auto service activities would range up to 80 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Noise attenuation from a point source will drop off at 6 dBA per doubling of the distance, resulting in a noise reduction of 6 dBA at 100 feet from the source. Therefore, the homes 100 feet from these auto service activities would experience noise levels up to 74 dBA Lmax. This range of maximum noise levels is lower than the daytime exterior noise standards of 75 dBA Lmax; however, even with windows closed, it exceeds the daytime interior noise standards of 45 dBA Lmax. A 6-foot-high concrete masonry wall surrounding the fire shop would provide a minimum of 6 dBA in noise attenuation to the nearby residences, thus reducing the daytime interior noise levels to below the standard (80 dBA - 6 dBA - 24 dBA - 6 dBA = 44 dBA). It is assumed that the auto service operations do not occur after 10:00 p.m. Further, delivery trucks for the anticipated on-site office/retail/restaurant uses would result in a maximum noise similar to noise readings from loading and unloading activities for other projects, which generates a noise level of 75 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Based on the site plan, the restaurant will be located in the southwest corner of the site, more than 400 feet from the nearest proposed on-site residence and more than 600 feet from existing residences to the north. Therefore, with the distance divergence, loading/ unloading noise would potentially reach up to 57 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the east and 53 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the north. This potential maximum noise level would not exceed the daytime exterior noise standard of 60 dBA; however, it would exceed the nighttime exterior 55 dBA LZS standard at the nearest proposed on-site residence if the noise lasts more than 15 minutes in any hour. Although a typical truck unloading process takes an average of 15-20 minutes, this maximum noise level occurs in a much shorter period of time, (i.e., in a few minutes). As long as the maximum noise level occurs in a time period less than 15 minutes in any hour, a nighttime exterior 60 dBA L,i standard will not be exceeded. Therefore, noise associated with loading and unloading activities at the restaurant would not result in noise levels exceeding either the daytime or nighttime exterior standards at the nearest residences to the north or the east. Standard building construction in southern California would provide 24 dBA or more in noise reduction from exterior to interior with windows and doors closed and 12 dBA or more with windows and doors open. With windows closed, the maximum interior noise attributable to the restaurant loading/unloading activities would be reduced to 33 dBA Lmax. With windows open, it would be reduced to 45 dBA Lmax. Thus, only with windows open could the 12 11231-000]\1031054v3.doc P298 nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax be exceeded. Therefore, the restaurant deliveries must be restricted to daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). In sum, because the fire shop may operate for a time after the residential units of the Project are constructed and occupied, Mitigation Measure 4.2.38 will be implemented to reduce any potential significant impact to a less than significant level. Further because the maximum interior noise attributable to the retail/office loading/unloading activities would only be reduced to 41 dBA Lmax at the existing residences to the north (which exceeds the nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax), Mitigation Measure 4.2.26 will be implemented which will require delivery hours to be restricted ensuring the nighttime interior noise standard will not be exceeded by the operations of the Project. B. Traffic Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with, regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the,number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the commercial portion of project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would result in LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. As identified above, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is forecast to exceed the satisfactory level of service of D in 2009 with the commercial conditions of the project. However, in the 2009 without project scenario, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection would also operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour which is an unsatisfactory level of service, and at 2007 existing conditions, this P.M. peak hour is at LOS E. However, because the forecast level of service at this intersection exceeds the minimum service standard of D in the year 2009 plus commercial scenario, a significant impact will result. 13 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P299 To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Commercial Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Opening Year 2009 with Residential Project Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Residential Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the residential portion of the project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection levels of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. However, even without the project (i.e., with just the 2009 baseline), the above intersection would operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour, which is an unsatisfactory level of service. Further, at existing 2007 conditions, the P.M. peak hour LOS level is at LOS E. Impacts to this intersection are considered a significant impact of the proposed project. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Residential Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 3. Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) Traffic and Level of Service 14 1123]-0001\1031054v3.doc P300 The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the addition of the entire project (commercial and residential) traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard of LOS D: Hermosa Avenue/Church Street would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. The level of service deficiency at the Hermosa Avenue and Church Street intersection is also forecast to occur in the year 2009 without the project; thus, the project would not produce the LOS deficiency by itself. Nonetheless, the project does contribute to the level of service deficiencies, resulting in a significant impact, and mitigation is required. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection are reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Entire Project Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. VIII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in the EIR. The City considered a range of reasonable alternatives as more fully discussed in the EIR. Some of these alternatives were rejected outright and were not analyzed in the EIR because they would not fulfill the basic project objectives. This range included: (1) No Build Alternative; (2) the Business Office Alternative; and (3) the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative. With regard to the No Build Alternative, no development would take place on the site, and the project site would be retained in its current condition. The existing tire shop, residences, strawberry fields, and commercial uses would remain on the property. Disallowing development of the site, as suggested by this alternative, would impose conditions that conflict 15 11231-0001\I031054v3.doc P301 with the existing vision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the site and the project area. The No Build Alternative does not represent the highest or best use of the site. Furthermore, retention of the project site in its current condition would not fulfill the primary objectives of the proposed project and would not provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community or augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City. The substantial economic and land use benefits derived from the development of the proposed project would be forfeited. Consequently, the No Build Alternative was rejected from further consideration in the EIR. With regard to the Business Office Alternative, the Business Office Alternative consists of the development of the project site entirely with office uses. The development of the entire site with such uses would not provide the varied retail, residential, and service uses associated with the proposed project. Additionally, the development of office uses would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community. Thus, this alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. Third, the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative would only consist of the development of 166 apartments that are proposed as part of the project. The office and commercial portions would not be developed as part of this alternative. The development of a portion of the site with residential uses would not provide the varied retail and service uses associated with the proposed project. Similar to the alternative for office uses, the development of apartments alone would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it bring new revenue-generating uses in the City. Additionally, the development of the residential portion alone would fail to achieve the objectives of the proposed project, in particular including promotion of "balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy," and providing "additional jobs to the local economy." This alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. B. Alternatives Analyzed in the EIR. The EIR however did undertake an analysis of three other potential project alternatives. These three alternatives were also rejected for the various reasons stated below. No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The No Project Alternative assumes what would reasonably be expected to occur, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services, in the foreseeable future. The project site is currently zoned Community Commercial and designated for General Commercial uses. Given the goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the continuing trend of infill development in the project area, it is highly reasonable in the event the proposed project were not approved, that the site would be developed with some type of commercial use. Within the Commercial zone, uses including offices, retail commercial, and general services are allowed. With the No Project Alternative, development of a retail commercial use is assumed at a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 25 percent, allowing up to 185,000 square feet of commercial floor space. 16 l 133 L0001 \ 1031054v3.doc P302 b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative, the project site is assumed to be developed with a commercial use consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning. With this alternative, significant unavoidable air quality impacts would occur that do not occur with the proposed project. In addition, impacts related to aesthetics, traffic, and noise would be increased over those of the proposed project. The No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative has been rejected because it would have greater impacts to air quality, noise, and traffic than the proposed project. In addition this alternative would not meet all of the City's objectives, which includes the failure of the alternative to "provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community." 2. Reduced Intensity Alternative a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the project site would be developed with approximately 75 percent of the residential, commercial, office, and restaurant uses envisioned under the proposed project.. ,.This alternative would result in 125 apartment units, a 3,750- square foot restaurant, an 18,750-square foot office building, and 12,000 square feet of retail shops. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the Reduced Intensity Alternative, visual resource impacts would be similar. Impacts related to short-term construction-related air quality and noise impacts would be reduced although similar to those identified with the proposed project. Further, long-term air quality operational emissions under this alternative would remain less than significant, although reduced in magnitude. Because of the reduction in vehicle trips achieved under this alternative, impacts to the operation of local roadways and intersections would be proportionally reduced from the proposed project. Under this alternative, the proposed project objectives are met, although to a lesser degree. Reducing the amount of commercial square footage would decrease the amount of revenue forecast to be generated by the proposed project. This Reduced Intensity Alternative has been rejected, because it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. 3. All Residential Project Alternative a. Summary of Alternative With the All Residential Alternative, development of apartment units similar to those in the proposed project would occur. This alternative assumes that the existing restaurant on the southeastern 1.5-acre corner of the project (the Whole Enchilada) would remain. Residential apartment uses would take place on 15.54 acres of the site and would be developed at the same density as the proposed project with 15.75 units per acre, resulting in 245 apartment units. This alternative would result in the same removal of all other existing uses on the property as the proposed project. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative 17 11231-OOOlU031054v3.doc P303 With the All Residential Project Alternative, potential impacts associated with short-term construction related air quality and noise impacts would remain similar to those identified with the proposed project. Impacts related to traffic operations would be proportionally reduced in relation to the reduction in trip generation between the All Residential Project Alternative and the proposed project. The volume of pollutants emitted during operation of the project under this alternative would be reduced and would be less than significant. The change in the vehicle noise achieved under this alternative would not be perceptible. With the reduction of traffic resulting from the development of the All Residential Project Alternative, air emissions and noise levels would be correspondingly reduced; however, the significance of air, noise, and traffic impacts would remain similar to those of the proposed project and would be less than significant. New housing opportunities would be created with the additional residential apartments planned for this alternative, however, the absence of retail uses from the project site would most likely reduce (sales tax) revenue to the City and therefore not meet all project objectives. 4. Off Site Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The Off-Site Location Alternative analyzes the impacts of the proposed project in a different location. This alternative would be composed of the same intensity and the same uses in an alternative location. An alternative site would require adequate land, access, and services, and must be compatible with adjacent uses. The selected location for the off-site alternative is southeast of the proposed project, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This site is currently zoned for industrial park uses and is approximately 17 acres. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative The Off-Site Alternative would have similar impacts to the proposed project in all impact areas with the exception of Hydrology and Water Quality which would be reduced. The Off-Site Alternative is not in a redevelopment area and does not meet the City's objective of locating development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts and therefore has been rejected. 5. Environmentally Superior Alternative The EIR has identified the Reduced Intensity Alternative as the environmentally superior alternative. However, because this alternative would meet the project objectives to a lesser degree than the proposed Project, the alternative has been rejected. More specifically, it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. C. The Project As Proposed Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the EIR. 2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed 18 1123]-OOOlU031054v3.doc P304 The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of the Alternatives described in the EIR and has compared it with those of the proposed Project. The City Council finds that the various Alternatives are infeasible for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons as discussed above. The City Council further finds that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interests of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the proposed Project locates development within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency project area designated for redevelopment, and as analyzed in the FEIR, minimizes any potential environmental effects. The proposed Project also provides 166 apartment units as workforce housing. Further, the proposed Project will make use of the availability of existing public improvements by locating the Project in a developed area, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public. The proposed Project also will help augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City with the addition of 16,000 square feet of retail shops, and a 5,000 square foot restaurant. Finally, the proposed Project will be an example of balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to residents and other users, and will strengthen the local economy by the addition of 25,000 square feet of office space, as well as retail and restaurant uses. For all of these reasons, the City Council has selected the proposed Project. 19 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc GENERAL PLAN -EXISTING GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW MEDIUM RESIDEMIAL l 1 LOW RESIDEMIAI INDUSTRIAL PARK LOW RESIDENTIAL ~ INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles P305 EXHIBIT B-1 GENERAL PLAN -PROPOSED N 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles P306 EXHIBIT B-2 P307 2 I ~ i w O r.l W W Z m2 y I ~.. m~ J U_ ~_ Z Q w j 0 Z Q ,.I ~ ~ ~ M N O M N N M fO M T O Q ~ N lfl f0 ~ ~' 7 r Q M ~ 0 d` 1 O U ~ L d ~ ~" . a o __ .;, y ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ ti ~ O~ j ,.. I ~~~ ''`' o d _.;.. - 07 N 1~ fO ~ '07 ; CO N O 4 N' N~I O N O i~ il fD V 0 I In 11 M 0 m M ~ tD r O CO r r tD M ar ~ N ° m : ; ~ Of f~ h la~ o °~ . Ir~ o Q ch M co IO rn O r O CD r M r f~ M Q ~ (D r I CAI tp~ N f~ . O C) :: N C7 M r• M h r < OD ~ U ~ r M Q ,- w y y b I dp~ .. C" ~ •C ~ ` ~ ti ~ o ~ W U ~ ,, . ' ~ ~ moc ` ._ ~o :,; Z j ` ~ ~4 lL Q ° N ~ O U1 ~ ro m J :., ~ ~ Q ,. . O T d •. N N O N O O N N p ~0 lp N ~ ~ r OD r ~ ~ N r r ~ M f` Q y ~ O 10 M 4'~` .O' O to [O I OI CO CA N I O f• I O O O'c ~A m O tCY r• U7 Q Z Q Z Q Z N O N MI tD M <}' r r 1~ Q Z ~ < q( Z h OI 1~ O m d y ~ N O '@1 1~ I [D 'C ~! ' C Q O h 1 0 I CO aD f` In p In ~ et ~Q ~ G l6 y G ~ N r .: LL) O r (D I r ' (D ~ ~ C') e- :~ M R tCY r Q A N {A 1~ 1 O 1~ O a ~• ~ . . . r r ~ y o- ~ h j .~ ~ ~ (D I~ NS ~ O n l 0 O I t!') M I~- I rn r to O N! '~ N O O O I 47 ^ Q Z a Z Q M R (D N f~ W N 'iT' Q Z CD M Q O O I O O ~ ~ __ _~ O ~ O .- 1~ to it'1 .- O O t0 I I N (D ~ O r i 1Cf O 1 0 ~ C ,'.' • ~ N O m f` O M O r O ^ O N to (Q r O r 00 I~ r r r r N ~ CA I bl CA ~ l p d y ,, O O M I O ~ ~~CO V- ~ O [F ~ b ~ N ~ I ~ 1~ NI O N M tO M Q 1~ H ~~ ~ R . 1 ~ O ~ O :' ~ : ; N CO ~j 1~ O V j ~ao. fD a ~ v ~ I O tD ~ C O to I t~ I IO IO ! aO N CO h ~ 1f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 J C , f r ~C o 1~ M r`:~~ ~ ~ n ~ 1 l t D Q N rn rn U y ~.. ~ ,C ... ~ M ti ° .I I I I I { I I I Z I l l l I I I I I I N rn a~ 3 ~ r q M p~ O n iV! 00 O "'Q+.7 - ~, N. 1~ W fD '7 Ip .- CO In N (O r O O r r t0 M N O O~ ~ I N I O [A!: N ~ Ni, Ol .O` C + O," 1*7 ~ O D O O O 1~ 1~ O ~ a0 O O N ID CA LD r M - N a (D CA O ~p L , + ~ : r ( N M f~ ~ N r . M r ~ O ~ W N ~D ~ U r N Q :, ~ 0 0 0 0 o G J Q M Q' ~ LL ~ ~ j 3 7 .Q O y C ~ N M ~ LL~ ~ N Ln t/1 N ~ ' ' C/1 7 N I F- 0 I Q Q 2 Q Z fp i c6 CV ~ N ~' Q Q. LL ~ Q ~ ~ ~ u' N L L L L ~j QI ~ ~ ~ . N ~ I LL' Q L L. (D L L U G ~ ~ 1 N ~ 1 N ~ I 'C ~ .U LQL u' ~ LLj ~ 7 (.~ . O . ¢ r Q I ~ ~ y -.J 2' O aV E E U a~ E O ~ R~ ; lC • ~ . O ~ - °O N 00 ~ 1° Q' c v i ~ g ~ "-~a ° E E ° `r' N .. m ~ N ~ . o ~ . .. to r u ~ L ~ I 3 ° b Z O'0 O cD D ~ N Qi DI O I CU ~ `.. N y Z i O 0 '` ~. O C N 7 a~ C 7 U C O '- O L Ib V O IA O ~ CO ~ O .C N L _ LL ~ a diL .~i.~~ E ~ c ~ ~ K > > R °-' c~a a~i c o I ~I E E r ~ •°O-t .Y `` I •d p .~ i N Q O Q d N L d O O 0 X 1 0 v .? j l (0 L zl o:z w v ~ c~ ~ ~ _ ~ o~ = o ~ w i,~~ w =~ ~~ a I ¢ C d L1 O a~ L r ai m c m m O u~ U p 01 •O C1 a ~' U :~ L ~ O O a a a, v o '0 ~ a~ ° R ~ t Q c r 3 ~ c E ~ ~ nE y m m E ~ Eg m ~ d ~m o ~_ N O C C ~~ C 7 ~a ~~oo ui E~~N c`S ~ ~~ ~ C ~ d d a~~E`m ~ ~ ~ Z 'n c _ - N O E w = " C N .O ~ ~ l7 - O N - C ?-. ~ ~ d d a ~,~~~ ~ E o ~ w _a_ =av,~ y la - C 7 d~ E ~ ~ ~ v a a rn C ~ N f6 ~ C ~ ~ C c ~ o ~ .y H CA d cCi av~~ c v C y .O ~ v ~ N L W C jj t ~_V S N N 'r W C d d O t` °a ~ m ~ Q ~ ° c C ~ C ~ to a. N 4) D N C d O a a ~ ~ S ?~dacrn~ ~ E ~,~'~ o a °• ~ '- 00 ~'m~o a ~ ,v_i d n •a o N d C C a- O 'O .O O N ~ fff ~ o ~ c ay ~• d ° ~~ ~ ~ O ad 3.~? o,r~ a - d ° U C y~ O N ~ ~ y 7 d O> Vi N ~ O .O O O O A :.9 y ~ ~ QL N~. m y ~ ; ~ p i' m`~_mo ~-1O Q C C O Q C y C to d ~ ~ 7 .~ N O C 'y ~ m ~ ~ O) O ~ ~ - O N C ~ C O N ~ ` W l0 O X ; U ~1-Z~~ a~ ~o EXHIBIT C-1 P308 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Page !I1-30 The Planning Center P:ICRA-07.OGIMarch 2002 Final GPIGP LU Masfer Report /or ' prinNng.doc October ]7, 200] use adjacent arterial highways to move to other portions of the mixed-use development. 8. Exhibit considerable flexibility in design in achieving maximum site potential and sensitivity to adjacent uses. 9. Apply CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles to provide both the reality and perception of public safety. 10. Provide a unique and engaging experience for both residents and visitors, similar to those often found in older cities. Each application of the Mixed-Use designation on the Land Use Plan has a specific intent. Therefore, the guidance for each one is tailored to that area. A land use table is provided for each mixed-use designation to establish the uses to be permitted and the general area to be devoted to each use. Flexibility is provided in the ranges to permit combinations of uses at a variety of overall intensities. Unless otherwise specified, the most intensive combination is the most desirable. The ten areas designated for Mixed-Use development under these provisions of the General Plan are: 1. The Regional Center area, bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, I-15 and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel; 2 A "Town Center" node at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; 3. The north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Hellman; 4. The western entrance to the City along Foothill Boulevard in the area generally know as Bear Gulch; 5. The Terra Vista Mixed Use Area, located along Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and 6. The Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, generally located west of Milliken Avenue, south of the railroad tracks, north of 4m Street, and east of Utica Avenue 7. The Foothill Boulevard -Cucamonga Channel Area, located at the base of "Red Hill," located near the Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 8. This Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site, on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and the original commercial center. 9. The Haven and Church site, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. 10. The Foothill Boulevard site, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, south of the residences on Stafford Street. EXHIBIT C-2 P309 2.5.3.6 Mixed Use (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The purpose of the Mixed-Use designation in the General Plan is to stimulate and guide development in special opportunity areas where land use change is desired. Mixed Use development may occur in two ways: 1) as a combination of uses in a single development project on a single parcel of land; or 2) as a combination of uses on multiple parcels within a specified district of the City. In either case, the intent is to achieve a complete integration of the uses and their support functions into a common concept. The effect of mixed-use development in the ten opportunity areas in which it is applied is to create special urban places within the general suburban patterri of single uses somewhat isolated from each other. While such a mixture would not be feasible over extensive portions of the City, it can be desirable within limited, focused areas. The expectations commonly required of mixed use developments through site planning, design, and use configuration is that they: 1. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian movement into and within the site. 2. Provide uses that are interconnected rather than being rigidly separated. 3. Include uses that are highly urban in character, with generally higher intensities of use than in surrounding areas. 4. Contain usable public open space that is highly accessible and convenient to residents and visitors. 5. Express a common design theme that may be carried out by architectural styles, landscaping and lighting treatment, - street improvements and street furniture, or other means of unifying the development. This does not precluded an eclectic mix of architectural styles; only that the development be tied together in its physical form by some means. 6. Involve a variety of scales and spaces to provide interest and diversity in the environment being created. 7. Include an integrated circulation system of arterial access, internal circulation, parking facilities, pedestrian pathways, bicycle routes, transit stops (where applicable), and related signage. It is intended that movement within the entire opportunity area be feasible on site without being forced to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Page /II-30 The Planning Center P:ICRA-Of.OGIMarch 2002 Final GPIGP LU Master Repoli for pnnring.doc October l7, 2001 use adjacent arterial highways to move to other portions of the mixed-use development. 8. Exhibit considerable flexibility in design in achieving EXHIBIT C-3 P310 III. DEi~ELOPING THE COMMUNITY 2.5.5.7 Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7.24-acre site is significant within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. At the southern base of "Red Hill," the site is strategically located near the northwest corner Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Like other newly designated Mixed Use districts, this site presents an opportunity to expand commercial office activity, while providing an opportunity for new multi-family development in the City. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area. TABLE 111-10 tD - CUCAMONGA 0% - 100% I 0 - 7.24 acres c~mce I 0% - 100% I 0 - 7 24 acres ' This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housino Overlay District lSHnnl 2.5.5.8 Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site This is a relatively small (3.24 acres), but significant, site within the historic Alta Loma commercial area. Once the location of a large citrus packing house, the site, now vacant, is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and original commercial center. This vacant parcel presents an opportunity to bring new activity into the historic town center either with new commercial office ventures, or with new multiple family developments, possibly aimed to provide housing for our growing senior citizen population. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area: TABLE Ill-11 ALTA LOMA AMETHYST MIXED-USE Land Use Miz I % Range I Acreage Ran e Medium-High Residential 10% -100% I 0 - 3.24 acres {14-24 dwelling units per acre) Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres City oJRancho Cucamonga Genera! Plan page ~p_q3 October 77, 2~~ 1:IPLINNING1LarryIGEN£RAL PLAM Fina12003 GP LU M¢ttn EXHIBIT C-4 Reportd°crevGd4d°r P311 2.5.5.9 Haven, and Church Site This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. The site represents a transition area between single family residential to the north and west and industrial/institutional (CVWD Maintenance and Office Facility) to the south and future Office uses across haven to the east. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. _ . _. _ ._ TABLE 11l-f 2 HAVEN AND CHURCH- FLODD CONTROL BA51N Land Use Mix Percent Range ~ Acreage Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.36 acres This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). 2.5.5.10 Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue This 17-acre site is significant within Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. A Master Plan of the site includes a proposed 10.54 acre 166-unit workforce multi-family housing project, an existing restaurant at the northwest corner of Foothill and Center, and a future commercial, office, and restaurant land use at the northeast corner of Hermosa and Foothill. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. raBLEnI-~3 _ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SITE- MIXED USE Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium/Medium High Residential` 0% - 62% 0 - 10.54 acres (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre) Commercial -Retail, Office 0% - 100% 0 - 17 acres (commercial and professional) and Restaurant ' This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. P312 ORDINANCE NO. 79~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals. 1. On January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-05, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Draft Ordinance. 2. On March 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on March 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically fihds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial (The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories, Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with existing single-family residences; the property to the west is designated General Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with existing commercial and residential P313 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 uses; the property to the east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park and is developed with an automotive service station and industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated General Commercial and is developed with restaurant, day care, and office uses; and c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the Environmental Impact Report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council makes the following findings under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act: a. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines"), the City prepared an Initial Environmental Study (the "Initial Study') for the Project. The Initial Study concluded that there was substantial evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact on several specifically identified resources, including air quality, noise, and traffic. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, and based upon information contained in the Initial Study, the City ordered the preparation of an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. On October 1, 2007, the City prepared and sent a Notice of Preparation of the EIR to responsible, trustee, and other interested agencies and persons in accordance with Guidelines Section 15082(a) fora 30-day review period. The City circulated the Draft EIR to the public and other interested parties fora 45-day review period from November 15, 2007 through December 31, 2007, consistent with the 45-day public comment period required by Guidelines Section 15087(c) and 15105. During this public comment period, the City received six (6) written comment letters regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR. The City also received an additional two (2) letters after the 45-day review period, for a total of eight (8) written comment letters. The City prepared written responses to all the comment letters received on the Draft EIR in accordance with Public Resources Code §21092.5 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15088. b. The City Council is the decision-making body for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. For purposes of making its recommendations on these applications, the City Council has received and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with the oral and written testimony received thereon during the hearing prior to any action on the Project. Based on that review, the City Council hereby certifies that the FEIR was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and the P314 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 Guidelines and that it adequately addresses the impacts and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-0635, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Development Review DRC2006-00633, and all other approvals necessary to carry out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The City Council further finds that that the modifications to the FEIR that have been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. c. The City Council finds that based on the FEIR, additional public comments, and the written and oral staff report, and Exhibit A to this Ordinance, that the Project will not cause significant environmental impacts except with respect to interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year 2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With respect to all of these potentially significant impacted areas and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to less than significant. d. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR, and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific changes and alterations required are contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F of the FEIR, avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of the Project as explained in Exhibit A to this Ordinance. The City Council finds that the mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant environmental effects of the Project. e. The City Council finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill the basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required no project alternative, the reduced intensity alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative, and the off-site location alternative. For the reasons explained in Exhibit A, the alternatives identified in the FEIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much lesser degree, and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the City Council finds that each of the alternatives is determined to be infeasible. f. The City Council further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt each of the mitigation measures set forth in the FEIR and incorporate those measures into the Project. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council adopt the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in Appendix F of the FEIR and incorporated herein by reference. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval. P315 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING March 5, 2008 Page 2 g. The custodian of records for the FEIR, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 4: The Development Districts Map is hereby amended to change from Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) to Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) for 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibits B and C and in accordance with the condition shown below: Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P316 EXHIBIT A TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUINCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08='* Findinqs and Facts in Support of Findinqs Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that will occur if a project is approved or carried out unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Rancho Workforce Housing Project. These findings are based upon evidence presented in the record of these proceedings, both written and oral, the FEIR and all of its contents, the Comments and Responses to Comments on the FEIR, and staff and consultants' reports presented to the City Council. II. Project Objectives As set forth in the FEIR, the objectives of the project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: A. Locate development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts; B. Provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community; C. More fully utilize the availability of existing public improvements, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public; D. Augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City; and 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P317 Promote balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an Initial study to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation, certain impacts of the Project were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study, and were not analyzed in the Draft EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural Resources; (C) Biological Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (D) Cultural Resources, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (E) Geology and Soils; (F) Hazardous and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality, with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (H) Land Use and Planning; (I) Mineral Resources; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Recreation; and (M) Utilities. IV. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Less Than Significant, and Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A general biological resources assessment/field study was conducted as part of the Initial Study to aid in the determination that the following issue areas would result in a less than significant impact. However, there still remains the potential for a significant impact to result to the following issue areas. As a result, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. A. Biological Resources Burrowing Owl The Project site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously used for agricultural purposes. Because of this, there is a lack of suitable habitat on the Project site and no probability for the occurrence of any sensitive species except with regard to the burrowing owl. Although the probability of the occurrence of the burrowing owl is low, the EIR has identified a mitigation measure to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: BIO-1: A precondition survey for the burrowing owl is required to confirm presence or absence of the species on the proposed project site. The pre-construction survey for the burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to the commencement of grading activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall not be required. 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P318 BIO-2: Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated prior to the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be conducted per applicable California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not be permitted during the nesting season for this species. b. Facts in Support of Findings Currently, the northwest and center portions of the proposed project site provide marginally suitable habitat for the burrowing owl. Although a Field Study was conducted as part of the Initial Study, apre-construction survey for the owl is required to confirm the presence or absence of the owl from the site to avoid impacts to any owl(s). Vegetation in these areas is low to moderate in height and interspersed with debris piles, thus providing a potential for owl occupancy. Vegetation within the northeastern portion consists of remnant vineyards, overgrown with ruderal vegetation. This portion of the project site would provide marginally suitable habitat as well, should conditions change (i.e., with vegetation removal). The burrowing owl is a mobile species; therefore, apre-construction survey is required to ensure no impact to burrowing owls that may occupy the proposed project site. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant. 2. Raptors The Project site contains a few large ornamental trees which could be suitable roosting or nesting trees for raptors. During the field survey conducted as part of the biological resources assessment conducted as part of the Initial Study, no nest for raptors were observed. However, because raptors are mobile and there is the possibility that nests may have been established during the period since the Initial Study, there is the potential for a significant impact. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure articulated below, any impact will be reduced to less than significant levels. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: BIO-3: Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1 and January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre- construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas. b. Facts in Support of Findings Because any raptor nests in the trees located on the project site may have been established after the Initial Study field survey, there is the potential for a significant impact with regard to raptors. However, with the incorporation of the above identified mitigation 11231-OOOI\1031054v3.doc P319 measure, any impact will be reduced to a less than significant level. The mitigation measure specifies the pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted, and that removal of trees shall be limited to the period outside the nesting season for raptors. Further, the mitigation measure requires that a qualified biologist be contacted if raptor nests or nesting birds are located. These measures will ensure a less than significant impact. B. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the Project site. Further, through compliance with Senate Bill 18 which requires notification of the Project to potentially affected Native American Tribes, only one Tribe responded indicating that there was no knowledge of any specific cultural or sacred resources on the site. Nevertheless, the potential to uncover an archeological resource may be present. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-1: In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find shall be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archeologist (meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. b. Facts in Support of Findings Although the site is located in a developed area where significant ground disturbance has occurred, the potential may still exist to uncover an archeological resource. With the incorporation of the above identified mitigation measure, any impact to an archeological resource will be less than significant. Specifically, if any archeological resource is found, any ground-disturbing activities will be relocated and a qualified archeologist will be consulted. Further, the archeological resource will be recorded and/or removed per City and State regulations. This will ensure that any impact is reduced to a less than significant level. Paleontological Resources The project site is located in The development of the existing road structures would have required a large a resulted in the discovery of or destruction have been no paleontological resources previously been disturbed, the potential t present. Findings an area containing extensive existing development. way, curbs, sidewalks, infrastructure, and nearby mount of ground disturbance that would have likely of existing paleontological resources. While there recorded within the City and the project area has o uncover a paleontological resource may still be 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P320 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: CUL-2: In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the vicinity of the discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations for further mitigation. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, any potential impact on paleontological resources will be less than significant. The measure will ensure that any excavation of the Project site will be halted when paleontological resources are encountered and that a qualified paleontologist be consulted, thereby ensuring a less than significant impact. C. Hydrology and Water Quality Structures Other than Residential in 100-year Flood Hazard Area Because a portion of the Project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area, and because a small portion of Hermosa Avenue (adjacent to the Project site) is prone to flooding, there is the potential for a significant impact to result. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, any potential impact will be less than significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") a Conditional Letter of Map Revision -Fill (CLOMR-F) to remove property from the 100-year flood zone map. HYD-2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and requirements including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro- modification impacts. b. Facts in Support of Findings The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) identify areas subject to 100-year flooding. An area along Hermosa Avenue is shown within the 100-year flood hazard area on the FIRMS. The conceptual plan for 1 1231-0001 U 031054v3.doc P321 the western portion of the project site includes commercial, office space, and a restaurant. The structures associated with the western portion of the project site may fall within the 100-year flood hazard area. Proper storm drainage facilities shall be constructed on the project site as part of the drainage plans to be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and City Engineer. Implementation of the features and facilities contained in the approved drainage plan will help to ensure that impacts associated with flooding or redirection of flood water flows are less than significant. In addition, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD-1 and HYD-2, impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant. V. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant A. Noise Impacts Certain noise impacts were studied in the EIR and found to be less than significant. Specifically, noise construction associated with groundbourne vibration was determined to be less than significant, as was the potential for the Project to expose people in the Project area to excessive noise levels based on the proximity to an airport. Further, the Project is not anticipated to cause excessive off-site traffic noise impacts. Although these noise impacts were found to be less than significant, other noise impacts, as articulated below, were found to be significant requiring mitigation. B. Air Quality Impacts Certain air quality impacts were studied in the EIR and also found to be less than significant. Specifically: (1) the proposed Project is consistent with the most recent Air Quality Management Plan; (2) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to construction emissions, with the exception of fugitive dust articulated below; (3) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to operational emissions; (4) the proposed Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations from architectural coatings; (5) the proposed Project will not impose short-term health risk impacts on sensitive receptors; and (6) the proposed Project will not create objectionable odors. VI. Effects Studied in the EIR But Which Have the Potential to Become Significant, But Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation A. Air Quality 1. Fugitive Dust Emissions The proposed Project is not anticipated to have a significant impact with regard to construction related fugitive dust emissions. Nevertheless, to ensure this impact remains less than significant, mitigation measures have been identified. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 11?31-0001\1031054v3.doc P322 4.1.1A During project construction the construction contractor shall implement the following measures to reduce fugitive dust. (A) Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. (B) All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. (C) All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). (D) Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. (E) All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically or chemically stabilized. (F) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. 4.1.18 The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.1.1C The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel powered equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible. 4.1.1D The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.1.1 E The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.1.1 F The construction contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. b. Facts in Support of Findings 7 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P323 Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on aproject-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions at the time of construction. The project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM10 component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. The following are the applicable Rule 403 Measures: • Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). • Water active sites at least twice daily. (Locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). • All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114 (freeboard means vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer). • Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road. • Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 mph or less Additional dust suppression measures in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are included as Mitigation Measures 4.1.1A through 4.1.1E to ensure that impacts remain less than significant. In sum, through compliance with Rule 402 and 403 as well as the additional measures incorporated as mitigation measures, this impact will be less than significant. VII. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to be Significant, But Reduced to a Level of Insignificance Through Mitigation The following impacts were analyzed in the EIR and found to be significant. However, with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, these impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final EIR (and below) would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level. A. Noise Interior Noise Levels 11231-OOOI\1031054v3.doc P324 The analysis in the EIR demonstrates that construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the on-site proposed residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.1A Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot-high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor uses, such as patios or park/recreation areas with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within 358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound wall/berm combination with an effective height of 8 feet. 4.2.16 Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.1C For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre parcel, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2.10 For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel, restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) unless the proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. b. Facts in Support of Findings The proposed residential uses would potentially be exposed to high traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, mitigation measures are required to ensure that the sensitive receptor locations are not exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the City's standards. Whether or not a specific apartment building is subject to the established mitigation measures depends on the building's location within the project. For residential units within the project site, the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would result in the construction of sound walls and mechanical ventilation. The sound walls would provide a 5 to 7 dBA or more in noise reduction for ground- floor receptors. With a combination of walls, doors, and windows, standard construction for southern California residential buildings would provide more than 20 dBA in exterior-to-interior noise reduction with windows closed and 12 dBA with the windows open. However, with windows open, there is a potential for interior noise on the ground floor units to exceed the 45 dBA Ldp standard (i.e., 63 dBA - 12 dBA = 51 dBA). Therefore, the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2.1A would be required to ensure that windows can remain closed for a prolonged period of time. Further, with the implementation of all the identified mitigation measures, noise levels would be reduced to a level that would be consistent with the City's General Plan noise standards. Therefore, impacts associated with this issue would be mitigated to level that is considered to be less than significant. 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P325 2. Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts Construction noise impacts resulting from the proposed Project will be potentially adverse requiring mitigation. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EfR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.2A The construction contractor shall implement the following mitigation measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. 4.2.28 The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4.2.2C The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4.2.2D During all site excavation and grading, the project/ construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. b. Facts in Support of Findings Noise levels from demolition, grading, and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA Lmax at the closest residential uses to the north of the project site for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse. Typical noise levels range up to 91 dBA Lmax at 50 feet during the noisiest construction phases. The site preparation phase, which includes site excavation and grading, tends to generate the highest noise levels, because the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers, dozers, draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full-power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower-power settings. Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. Noise typically associated with the use of construction equipment is estimated between 79 and 89 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from the construction effort for the grading phase. This equipment would be used on site. Each dozer would generate a maximum of 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, and water and pickup trucks would generate approximately 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal 10 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P326 strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual noise source, the worst-case composite noise level during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lma, at a distance of 50 feet from an active construction area. As these noise sources are point sources, the noise decreases at a rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The nearest residences are located to the north of the project site along Stafford Street. These residences are approximately 25 feet from the project boundary and may be subjected to short-term noise reaching 97 dBA Lmax intermittently generated by construction activities on site. Additionally, demolition of the existing buildings on the western 5-acre parcel may occur after the project apartments are occupied; however, these will be no closer than the existing residences. This level of noise is comparable with vehicular traffic noise on Foothill Boulevard. Construction-related noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse; however, with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. To minimize the impact of the construction noise on residences adjacent to the project area, compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance would be required. Because Construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels at the closest residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed, the above identified mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. More specifically, by limiting construction hours, using noise mufflers on construction equipment, and placing construction equipment and staging areas away from residential uses, this significant impact will be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3. Long Term Operational Noise Impacts The EIR found that the proposed Project would cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels associated with long-term operations of the proposed Project. This significant impact will be reduced to a less than significant level with the imposition of mitigation measures. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.2.3A For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a residential use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.). 4.2.36 In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the tire shop, a 6-foot-high wall surrounding the tire shop will be required in order to reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than significant level. b. Facts in Support of Findings 11 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P327 Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would be associated primarily with operations at the on-site commercial uses. These commercial uses would generate noise from truck delivery, loading/unloading activities, and other activities at the parking lot. These activities are potential point sources of noise that could affect noise-sensitive receptors adjacent to the loading areas, such as the proposed residential uses on site. For example, there is an auto tire shop located on the project site near the center of the Foothill Boulevard frontage that would project noise to the surrounding proposed residences. This business is scheduled to be removed; however, it is possible it will continue operation for some period after the apartment portion of the project is built. Noise sources from the auto tire shop include customer-generated noises as well as noises associated with auto services, such as pneumatic drills, hydraulic lifts, and other machinery or equipment typically used in such operations. It is anticipated that the closest project residences will be located no less than 100 feet from the auto service area. Peak noise levels associated with the auto service activities would range up to 80 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Noise attenuation from a point source will drop off at 6 dBA per doubling of the distance, resulting in a noise reduction of 6 dBA at 100 feet from the source. Therefore, the homes 100 feet from these auto service activities would experience noise levels up to 74 dBA Lmax. This range of maximum noise levels is lower than the daytime exterior noise standards of 75 dBA Lmax, however, even with windows closed, it exceeds the daytime interior noise standards of 45 dBA Lmax. A 6-foot-high concrete masonry wall surrounding the tire shop would provide a minimum of 6 dBA in noise attenuation to the nearby residences, thus reducing the daytime interior noise levels to below the standard (80 dBA - 6 dBA - 24 dBA - 6 dBA = 44 dBA). It is assumed that the auto service operations do not occur after 10:00 p.m. Further, delivery trucks for the anticipated on-site office/retail/restaurant uses would result in a maximum noise similar to noise readings from loading and unloading activities for other projects, which generates a noise level of 75 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Based on the site plan, the restaurant will be located in the southwest corner of the site, more than 400 feet from the nearest proposed on-site residence and more than 600 feet from existing residences to the north. Therefore, with the distance divergence, loading/ unloading noise would potentially reach up to 57 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the east and 53 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the north. This potential maximum noise level would not exceed the daytime exterior noise standard of 60 dBA; however, it would exceed the nighttime exterior 55 dBA LZS standard at the nearest proposed on-site residence if the noise lasts more than 15 minutes in any hour. Although a typical truck unloading process takes an average of 15-20 minutes, this maximum noise level occurs in a much shorter period of time, (i.e., in a few minutes). As long as the maximum noise level occurs in a time period less than 15 minutes in any hour, a nighttime exterior 60 dBA L„ standard will not be exceeded. Therefore, noise associated with loading and unloading activities at the restaurant would not result in noise levels exceeding either the daytime or nighttime exterior standards at the nearest residences to the north or the east. Standard building construction in southern California would provide 24 dBA or more in noise reduction from exterior to interior with windows and doors closed and 12 dBA or more with windows and doors open. With windows closed, the maximum interior noise attributable to the restaurant loading/unloading activities would be reduced to 33 dBA Lmax. With windows open, it would be reduced to 45 dBA Lmax. Thus, only with windows open could the 12 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P328 nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax be exceeded. Therefore, the restaurant deliveries must be restricted to daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). In sum, because the fire shop may operate for a time after the residential units of the Project are constructed and occupied, Mitigation Measure 4.2.36 will be implemented to reduce any potential significant impact to a less than significant level. Further because the maximum interior noise attributable to the retail/office loading/unloading activities would only be reduced to 41 dBA Lma, at the existing residences to the north (which exceeds the nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax), Mitigation Measure 4.2.26 will be implemented which will require delivery hours to be restricted ensuring the nighttime interior noise standard will not be exceeded by the operations of the Project. B. Traffic Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the commercial portion of project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: • Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would result in LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. As identified above, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is forecast to exceed the satisfactory level of service of D in 2009 with the commercial conditions of the project. However, in the 2009 without project scenario, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection would also operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour which is an unsatisfactory level of service, and at 2007 existing conditions, this P.M. peak hour is at LOS E. However, because the forecast level of service at this intersection exceeds the minimum service standard of D in the year 2009 plus commercial scenario, a significant impact will result. 13 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P329 To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Commercial Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Opening Year 2009 with Residential Project Conditions Traffic and Level of Service Impacts The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Residential Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifcally, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. With the addition of the residential portion of the project traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the intersection levels of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard: Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. However, even without the project (i.e., with just the 2009 baseline), the above intersection would operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour, which is an unsatisfactory level of service. Further, at existing 2007 conditions, the P.M. peak hour LOS level is at LOS E. Impacts to this intersection are considered a significant impact of the proposed project. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P. M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Residential Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. 3. Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) Traffic and Level of Service 14 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P330 The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial) of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels: 4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development. b. Facts in Support of Findings With the addition of the entire project (commercial and residential) traffic to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the level of service at the following intersection would result in less than the minimum service standard of LOS D: • Hermosa Avenue/Church Street would operate at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service standard of D. The level of service deficiency at the Hermosa Avenue and Church Street intersection is also forecast to occur in the year 2009 without the project; thus, the project would not produce the LOS deficiency by itself. Nonetheless, the project does contribute to the level of service deficiencies, resulting in a significant impact, and mitigation is required. To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection are reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Entire Project Conditions will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance. VIII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in the EIR. The City considered a range of reasonable alternatives as more fully discussed in the EIR. Some of these alternatives were rejected outright and were not analyzed in the EIR because they would not fulfill the basic project objectives. This range included: (1) No Build Alternative; (2) the Business Office Alternative; and (3) the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative. With regard to the No Build Alternative, no development would take place on the site, and the project site would be retained in its current condition. The existing fire shop, residences, strawberry fields, and commercial uses would remain on the property. Disallowing development of the site, as suggested by this alternative, would impose conditions that conflict 15 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P331 with the existing vision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the site and the project area. The No Build Alternative does not represent the highest or best use of the site. Furthermore, retention of the project site in its current condition would not fulfill the primary objectives of the proposed project and would not provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community or augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City. The substantial economic and land use benefits derived from the development of the proposed project would be forfeited. Consequently, the No Build Alternative was rejected from further consideration in the EIR. With regard to the Business Office Alternative, the Business Office Alternative consists of the development of the project site entirely with office uses. The development of the entire site with such uses would not provide the varied retail, residential, and service uses associated with the proposed project. Additionally, the development of office uses would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community. Thus, this alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. Third, the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative would only consist of the development of 166 apartments that are proposed as part of the project. The office and commercial portions would not be developed as part of this alternative. The development of a portion of the site with residential uses would not provide the varied retail and service uses associated with the proposed project. Similar to the alternative for office uses, the development of apartments alone would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it bring new revenue-generating uses in the City. Additionally, the development of the residential portion alone would fail to achieve the objectives of the proposed project, in particular including promotion of "balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive and convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy," and providing "additional jobs to the local economy." This alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development of the project site. B. Alternatives Analyzed in the EIR. The EIR however did undertake an analysis of three other potential project alternatives. These three alternatives were also rejected for the various reasons stated below. 1. No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The No Project Alternative assumes what would reasonably be expected to occur, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services, in the foreseeable future. The project site is currently zoned Community Commercial and designated for General Commercial uses. Given the goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the continuing trend of infill development in the project area, it is highly reasonable in the event the proposed project were not approved, that the site would be developed with some type of commercial use. Within the Commercial zone, uses including offices, retail commercial, and general services are allowed. With the No Project Alternative, development of a retail commercial use is assumed at a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 25 percent, allowing up to 185,000 square feet of commercial floor space. 16 11231-000111031054v3.doc P332 Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative, the project site is assumed to be developed with a commercial use consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning. With this alternative, significant unavoidable air quality impacts would occur that do not occur with the proposed project. In addition, impacts related to aesthetics, traffic, and noise would be increased over those of the proposed project. The No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative has been rejected because it would have greater impacts to air quality, noise, and traffic than the proposed project. In addition this alternative would not meet all of the City's objectives, which includes the failure of the alternative to "provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community." 2. Reduced Intensity Alternative Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the project site would be developed with approximately 75 percent of the residential, commercial, office, and restaurant uses envisioned under the proposed project. This alternative would result in 125 apartment units, a 3,750- square foot restaurant, an 18,750-square foot office building, and 12,000 square feet of retail shops. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative With the Reduced Intensity Alternative, visual resource impacts would be similar. Impacts related to short-term construction-related air quality and noise impacts would be reduced although similar to those identified with the proposed project. Further, long-term air quality operational emissions under this alternative would remain less than significant, although reduced in magnitude. Because of the reduction in vehicle trips achieved under this alternative, impacts to the operation of local roadways and intersections would be proportionally reduced from the proposed project. Under this alternative, the proposed project objectives are met, although to a lesser degree. Reducing the amount of commercial square footage would decrease the amount of revenue forecast to be generated by the proposed project. This Reduced Intensity Alternative has been rejected, because it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. 3. All Residential Project Alternative a. Summary of Alternative With the All Residential Alternative, development of apartment units similar to those in the proposed project would occur. This alternative assumes that the existing restaurant on the southeastern 1.5-acre corner of the project (the Whole Enchilada) would remain. Residential apartment uses would take place on 15.54 acres of the site and would be developed at the same density as the proposed project with 15.75 units per acre, resulting in 245 apartment units. This alternative would result in the same removal of all other existing uses on the property as the proposed project. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative 17 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P333 With the All Residential Project Alternative, potential impacts associated with short-term construction related air quality and noise impacts would remain similar to those identified with the proposed project. Impacts related to traffic operations would be proportionally reduced in relation to the reduction in trip generation between the All Residential Project Alternative and the proposed project. The volume of pollutants emitted during operation of the project under this alternative would-be reduced and would be less than significant. The change in the vehicle noise achieved under this alternative would not be perceptible. With the reduction of traffic resulting from the development of the All Residential Project Alternative, air emissions and noise levels would be correspondingly reduced; however, the significance of air, noise, and traffic impacts would remain similar to those of the proposed project and would be less than significant. New housing opportunities would be created with the additional residential apartments planned for this alternative, however, the absence of retail uses from the project site would most likely reduce (sales tax) revenue to the City and therefore not meet all project objectives. 4. Off Site Alternative a. Summary of Alternative The Off-Site Location Alternative analyzes the impacts of the proposed project in a different location. This alternative would be composed of the same intensity and the same uses in an alternative location. An alternative site would require adequate land, access, and services, and must be compatible with adjacent uses. The selected location for the off-site alternative is southeast of the proposed project, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This site is currently zoned for industrial park uses and is approximately 17 acres. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative The Off-Site Alternative would have similar impacts to the proposed project in all impact areas with the exception of Hydrology and Water Quality which would be reduced. The Off-Site Alternative is not in a redevelopment area and does not meet the City's objective of locating development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any potential environmental impacts and therefore has been rejected. 5. Environmentally Superior Alternative The EIR has identified the Reduced Intensity Alternative as the environmentally superior alternative. However, because this alternative would meet the project objectives to a lesser degree than the proposed Project, the alternative has been rejected. More specifically, it limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project. C. The Project As Proposed Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the EIR. 2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed 18 11231-0001\1031054v3.doc P334 The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of the Alternatives described in the EIR and has compared it with those of the proposed Project. The City Council finds that the various Alternatives are infeasible for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons as discussed above. The City Council further finds that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interests of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the proposed Project locates development within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency project area designated for redevelopment, and as analyzed in the FEIR, minimizes any potential environmental effects. The proposed Project also provides 166 apartment units as workforce housing. Further, the proposed Project will make use of the availability of existing public improvements by locating the Project in a developed area, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public. The proposed Project also will help augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City with the addition of 16,000 square feet of retail shops, and a 5,000 square foot restaurant. Finally, the proposed Project will be an example of balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to residents and other users, and will strengthen the local economy by the addition of 25,000 square feet of office space, as well as retail and restaurant uses. For all of these reasons, the City Council has selected the proposed Project. 19 11231-OOOI\1031054v3.doc ZONING MAP - EXISTING 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles P335 EXHIBIT B-1 ZONING MAP - PROPOSED Industrial Low Residential Low Residential Park m c v a Low Residential v .i J ~ ~ Industrial 2 ' ~ . ., r ., _ Park Low Residential Commercial Office ' (~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^. I Commercial Community Commercial Low Medium Residential 0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles F Mixed Use } P336 EXHIBIT B-2 m X T2 W 00 w w N v N O LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR. MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL MASTER PLAN.APPROVED PUR SUANT'TO DRC]003-01036 PPRIL 14, 1004 COMMERCIAL SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL CC COMMUNIN COMMERCUIL RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL *, MASTER PLAN APPROVEb PURSUANT TO DRC 2008-00835, DRC2008~8063q, 6 ORC]806-00633 FEBRUAR Y'2006 OFFICE MU MIXED USE O OFFICE GO COMMERCIAUOFFICE INDUSTRIAL LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC U UTILITY P PUBLIC ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA LAND USE PLAN O h C 0 0 0 a m n 0 a m N O O~ V N O Ib ~.1.T (h~ V SUBAREA 3 P338 Rancho Cucamonga Develonment Code Section 17 08 030 Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreaae Ranae Medium-High Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17.08 and 17.10. All uses that may be authorized under the Offce designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08 and .17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable within the Mixed Use District, 2. Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Site: This 31.5 acre site is located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site: Land Use Mix Percent Ranae Acreage Range High Residential 40% - 45% 12.6 - 14.2 acres Office 55% - 60% 17.3 - 18.9 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.30. .All uses and activities that are permitted, or may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, under the High Residential, Office/Professional, General Commercial, and Industrial Park designations are subject to the same permitting processes and development standards as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.20, shall be applicable to any development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. 3. Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site: This 7.24-acre site is located at the base of "Red Hill" on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre Office 0% - 10D% 0 - 7.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to a Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District." This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). EXHIBIT C 17.os-1o 2/oa P339 Rancho Cucamon¢a Development Code Section 17 08 030 4. Haven. Church and Center Site: This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix, Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre " Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.36 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed 'Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, and 17.10. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to Development Code Chapter 17.10. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, and 17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue Site: This 17- acre site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Medium/Medium High 0% - 62% 0 -10.54 acres. Residential (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre Commercial -Retail, Office 0% - 100% 0 -17 acres (commercial and professional), and Restaurant The land use categories propdsed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32: All uses that may be authorized under the commercial designation are subject to Development Code Chapter 17.32. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. * This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. 17.08-11 2/04 STAFF REPORT P340 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RANCxo Date: March 5, 2008 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director By: Flavio H. Nunez, Redevelopment Analyst I I Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING, L. P RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached resolutions approving the sale of Agency owned property generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue and approving the execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement between the Agency and Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P. BACKGROUND In 2005 the Agency entered into an Exclusive Negotiations Agreement (ENA) with Workforce Homebuilders (Developer) to study the feasibility of a potential multi-family housing project with a component of workforce housing. In FY 2005/06 the Agency successfully acquired two parcels of land totaling approximately 10.5 acres in size as part of the ENA activity (refer to attached Location Map). As required by the ENA, the developer was required to go through the City's entitlement process as well as an environmental study. The Developer also prepared a housing market analysis and has held neighborhood meetings in order to include feedback and data as part of the design process. P341 ANALYSIS With the completion of the responsibilities outlined in the ENA, and subject to approval of the required development entitlements, the approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) is proposed. The DDA provides for the parameters of the inclusion of workforce housing and the financing relationship between the Agency and the Developer. Included in the DDA is the transfer of the 10.5 acre property at fair market value provided the developer performs under the terms and conditions of the DDA. A recent appraisal of the Property was conducted and determined the fair market value to be $8.8 million. As provided in the DDA, the Agency is financing a gap loan of approximately $27,565,000 million, including land and relocation costs, for the proposed development. It should also be noted that in addition to the contribution to the project by the Agency, the developer will be seeking State Tax Credits and private financing. A public hearing related to the tax credits and associated multi family bond issuance is also on the agenda for the City Council's consideration. The DDA requires that at least 131 of the total 166 units within the development be made available to low and moderate income residents in perpetuity, but not less than 99-years. The remaining units within the project will be leased at market rates. In addition to the DDA, the Agency has on this same agenda the consideration of a Regulatory Agreement, Loan Agreement and other related documents which will help to insure that tenant selection criteria and property maintenance are maintained at the highest standards possible. Since the developer's tax credit and private financing application depends on approval of the DDA, staff also recommends that the City Council and Agency Board authorize the Agency's Executive Director or his designee to make administrative approvals that do not change the major financial deal points of the DDA. The attached report, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 33433, identifies the total cost of the property to be conveyed, and describes how the sale will assist in the elimination of blight. This report and a copy of the Disposition, Development Agreement are available for review during the noticing period. In addition, a public notice of this hearing has appeared in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully sunnbmitted, N_~~~ in~~niels Redevelopment Director Attachments: Location Map 33433 Summary Report Resolutions for approval P342 LOCATION MAP DEPICTION OF SITE STAFFORD 2 m A O D P343 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Report of Sale of Property Health and Safety Code Section 33433 APN: 1077-601-02, 1077-601-03, and 1077-601-04 The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency proposes to sell to Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P. approximately 10.5 acres of land generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue for the purpose of developing 166 unit of rental housing, including at least 131 units of rental housing for low and moderate income residents. The following information is provided pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433. A. Land Acquisition Cost: $ 8,100,000 B. Estimated fair market value of property to be Conveyed at highest and best use: $8,800,000 D. Sale price: $8,800,000 The Agency is selling the property at no less than the fair market value. E. Elimination of Blight The proposed development of 166 units, including 131 units of affordable rental housing will assist in reducing the overall community need for affordable housing. Additionally, the new construction will act as a catalyst for further neighborhood revitalization Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan west of Haven Avenue. P344 RESOLUTION N0. D $- ~,Jr~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"), IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO A. Recitals (i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq), among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies, contains Section 33433 which provides that prior to the sale of any property acquired with tax increment moneys, the sale must be approved by the legislative body by resolution following a duly noticed public hearing. (ii) The officially adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan and Implementation Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency" hereinafter) provides for the development of affordable housing for occupancy by low and moderate income persons. (iii) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is the owner of certain real property generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Property" hereinafter). (iv) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has received a proposal to purchase the Property from Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P., a limited partnership, for the purpose of developing approximately 166 units of rental housing. (v) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the Agency has prepared a report summarizing the cost of the sale of the Property. (vi) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 5, 2008, on the subject of the Agency's sale of the Property, and having considered all oral and written testimony presented at the public hearing, decided to adopt this Resolution, including findings set forth hereafter. P345 (vii) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred as required bylaw. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the sale of the Property as described in the DDA will be of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. 3. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the sale of the Property pursuant to the DDA will assist in the elimination of blight within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area by providing affordable housing for persons of low and moderate income and by serving as a catalyst for further revitalization of the Foothill Specific Plan west of Haven Avenue. 4. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the total consideration for the property is not less than the fair reuse value at the use with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the Disposition and Development Agreement. 5. The City Council hereby approves the sale of the Property by the Agency to the Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P., approves the execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement by the Agency, and authorizes the Agency to take any and all actions necessary to complete the sale. 6. The City Clerk shall testify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5~h day of March, 2008. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: P346 RESOLUTION N0. RfI Q $.=0 0 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"), IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO A. Recitals (i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq), among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies, contains Section 33433 which provides that prior to the sale of any property acquired with tax increment moneys, the sale must be approved by the legislative body by resolution following a duly notices public hearing. (ii) The officially adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan and Implementation Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency' hereinafter) provides for the development of affordable housing. (iii) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is the owner of certain real property generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Property" hereinafter). (iv) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has received a proposal to purchase the Property from Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P., a limited partnership, for the purpose of developing approximately 166 units of rental housing. (v) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the Agency has prepared a report summarizing the cost of the sale of the Property. (vi) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 5, 2008, on the subject of the Agency's sale of the Property, approved the sale of the Property, and made certain findings regarding the sale of the Property. (vii) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred as required by law. P347 B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that the sale of the Property by and through the Agency's funding will be of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. 3. The Agency hereby specifically fnds and determines that the sale of the Property pursuant to the DDA will assist in the elimination of blight within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area by providing affordable housing for low and moderate income persons and by serving as a catalyst for further revitalization of the Foothill Specific Plan west of Have Avenue. 4. The Agency hereby approves the Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") with Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P., and authorizes the Chairman and Executive Director to execute on behalf of the Agency the DDA, substantially in the form on file with the Agency Secretary, with such changes as are approved by the Chairman and Executive Director, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the DDA, and to take any and all actions necessary to complete the sale of the Property. 5. The Agency hereby specifically finds that the financial obligations which it will undertake in the sale of the Project will not impair its ability to discharge any financial obligation previously undertaken by it with respect to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. 6. The Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that the total consideration for the property is not less than the fair reuse value at the use with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the Disposition and Development Agreement. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall testify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2008. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Date: March 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director By: Flavio H. Nunez, Redevelopment Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY ("CMFA") FOR RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve the issuance of housing revenue bonds by the CMFA for Rancho Workforce Housing through adoption of the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the California Municipal Finance Authority. The Authority has received an application from National Community Renaissance of California requesting an amount not to exceed $24 million of tax-exempt obligations to assist in the construction of the proposed Rancho Workforce Housing project. Rancho Workforce Housing project will consist of 104 2-bedroom units, 60 3-bedroom units, and 2- manager units with approximately 80% of the units affordable to families earning between 35% and 60% of the area median income. Twenty percent of the units will be at market rents. The bond debt is supported by the project revenues, and is the obligation of the developer. Neither the City nor the Agency incurs any obligation for the bond debt. As part of the fee sharing agreement, twenty-five percent (up to $13,750) of the issuance fees will be granted to the City's general fund and National Community Renaissance will be the beneficiary of a similar donation through a 25% reduction in issuance fees. Prior to issuance of bonds by CMFA, the City is required to conduct a TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) public hearing on the proposed bond financing. Although the CMFA will be the issuer of the tax-exempt revenue bonds for the borrower the financing cannot proceed without the City, as the governmental entity having jurisdiction over the site, approving CMFA's issuance of indebtedness. P348 P349 As required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, notice of this hearing was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 20, 2008. Following consideration of any written or public testimony provided either prior to or during the public hearing, a Resolution has been provided for Council consideration. The Resolution provides authority to CMFA to issue Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $24 Million to provide financing for the project. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Attachment: Resolution of Approval P350 RESOLUTION NO. O S- ~57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority (the "Authorit}~') is authorized pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. and the terms of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the "Agreement"), among certain local agencies throughout the State of California, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), to issue revenue bonds in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of financing multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, Rancho Workforce Housing, L.P., a California limited partnership, or related entities, has requested that the Authority adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such revenue bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $24,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount (the "Bonds"), to finance the acquisition and construction of a 166-unit multifamily rental housing project, generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to be known as Rancho Workforce Housing (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Bonds or a portion thereof will be "private activity bonds" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to their issuance, private activity bonds are required to be approved by the "applicable elected representative" of the governmental units on whose behalf such bonds are expected to be issued and by a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the entire area in which any faci]ity financed by such bonds is to be located, after a public hearing held following reasonable public notice; and WHEREAS, the members of this City Council (this "Council") are the applicable elected representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date hereof, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on a date specified in such notice; and WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on such date, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and P351 WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Bonds required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 9 of the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals aze true and correct. Section 2. The Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the Council that this resolution constitute approval of the Bonds for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code and (b) Section 9 of the Agreement. Section 3. The officers of the City aze hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby. Section 4. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution and a copy of the affidavit of publication of the hearing notice to: Stephen A. Spitz, Esq. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 405 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105 Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. OHS Wesc260351369.1 2. P352 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th day of March, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk OHS Wcsc260351369.1 STAFF REPORT - REDEVELOPNLENT AGENCY RANCHO Date: March 5, 2008 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director By: Flavio H. Nunez, Redevelopment Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL OF A LOAN AGREEMENT, REGULATORY AGREEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND A SHARED APPRECIATION INTEREST AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING, L.P TO ASSIST IN THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS RELATED TO THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZATION OF AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $18.5 MILLION FROM 2622801-5620 RECOMMENDATION Approve the above referenced documents and authorization to make an appropriation to Redevelopment Agency Account number 2622801-5620 in the amount not to exceed $18.5 million to assist in the development of the proposed Rancho Workforce Housing Project generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2005 the Agency entered into an Exclusive Negotiations Agreement (ENA) with Workforce Homebuilders (Developer) to study the feasibility of a potential multi-family housing project with a component of workforce housing. In FY 2005/06 the Agency successfully acquired two parcels of land totaling approximately 10.5 acres in size as part of the ENA activity (refer to attached Location Map). As required by the ENA, the developer was required to go through the City's entitlement process as well as an environmental study. The Developer also prepared a housing market analysis and has held neighborhood meetings in order to include feedback and data as part of the design process. The Loan Agreement between the Agency and Rancho Workforce Housing, LP provides a gap loan in the amount not to exceed $27,565,000 including land and relocation costs, for the proposed development. It should be noted that in addition to the contribution to the project by the Agency, the developer will be seeking State Tax Credits and private financing. A public hearing related to the tax credits and associated multi family bond issuance is also on the agenda for the City Council's consideration. P353 P354 The loan provided to the developer will be repaid on a residual receipts basis at 1.5% interest for a term of 55-years. The affordability covenants are recorded with the land in perpetuity, but not less than 99-years. As provided in the Regulatory Agreement 131-units will be restricted to residents earning 35%, 45%, and 60% of the county area median income. The remaining units will be at market rents with two units allocated for onsite management. In total the project consists of 166-units. Additionally, under the Operations and Maintenance Agreement the Developer will be required to have the property be part of our Multi-Family Crime Free Housing Program. Lastly, consistent with Agency policy, the agreement provides for an equity share upon default, resale, or refinance of the project. Since the developer's tax credit and private financing application depends on approval of the DDA, staff also recommends that the City Council and Agency Board authorize the Agency's Executive Director or his designee to make administrative approvals that do not change the major financial deal points of the DDA. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~j Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director P355 LOCATION MAP DEPICTION OF SITE x m A O a i .'` t a ~;' x 3 £.> ~~~s ' ~, ;> n m z m z STAFFORD H U 0 V V O t V t+ N f+ .~ d a a~ ._ 0 C O t Q N V .~ ~+ C d A a a~ ._ 0 I~ l~ ~] ~~ O O N \~w 7 L O ~ L - O ^~• W 4~ ~ c°y ~ .. > 00 N ~ ~' `~ 4~ ~ o c~ ~ .. +~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q .. ~ ~ Cn r` ~, cn 0. ~ ~ o ~ . ~ N ~ ~ ~ , ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~, ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U .~ ~- o .- ~ ~ ~ ~- a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~- ~ a. ,~~ a ' I ~~ ~ III. 4 L 0. }J L .~ L ~ U ~ .~ ~ ~ _U _~ .~ O ^ 0 i O U ~ ~ ~ V ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~ I U ~ L •--~ L 0 U ~ U ~ ~ ~ X ~ N ~ L O U O U L I Q U U /~ 'PI V U .L .~ c~ .~ _~ Q .j N O c~ 0 .~ LU. Q .j N ^U' W . O ~^ 1..I.. _~ Q .~ O O U Q L .~ 4~~' O .~ O O .~ Q .> N N U .~ -~ Q O a~n L N a--~ V L w z 1 N U .~ N ~--~ C N a ._ -}-~ n~ W n_o' W n~ W v / O ~- U 0 a~ c~ c~ o = U ~ ~ ~ ~ `rn~~ ~~ nv /' n~~ W W n~ W ~ ~ a~ ca ~~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ c~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~ ~ o .- ~~ U o o .. c~ ~~ :~. c~ ~' ~ ~' ~ :l ~~ ~I ' w L a 0 L ~~..~ ^ , (~ W ~ ` ~ a ^ • ~ W ~_ ^~ ~ O oa ~~ ._ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ V rwti `/~ ti V .ti (V V `~ fi h 0 ul V E a ~o U 3 47 ~--~ 0 Q y`` V ~ 0 ~ O O O i y ~ W ~ M ~- f~l F' ~ A ~ 0 V/ }+ ~ ^,~ ~, W ~ (~ ~ a' W L . ~ ~--r Q .~ O~ ~~ ~; ~~ L W ~~ y~ ~~ ~..,.. .~ h~ .~ V t.' r C h ` ~~ ~ O 0 0 ui N ~~ o o 0 0 ~ 0 o o goo ~m m m LL r Eo0 '9lNi A ~°o~ V~ ~ a o n ~ w `gym°~d= S LL 3 0~ u ~ i e N N em a ~ ~'' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o V N L7 d Q ~ ~ O ~ o °o N ~, ~ ~ o o .i , a : ~ m o ~v U ~ I C O C ~ `~„ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ 10 ~ QI ~ 8 ~ O C fi ` LPL r.+ CL , G ~ ~ ~. •' C ` O g ''+ d O 'a~ ~ OJ ~ '~ O ~ ~ aVi q d~ t ~ 6ul a0+ c 0 ~ Ootoaau ~ ,., ~. ~~ ~-. }~ ~ a--~ _~ ~- U ~ ~ C~ ~ U O n' L W ^~ o~ }+ .C O ^L' ~ W ~ ~~ V .y c fi a ~~' a 0 u ,y u L a C d ~0 a W a~ c 0 L } l0 C ~M ~N yN o. ~ o '~ V~ yN Ea a 'N C ~ c~ O `~ r v, a ~ ~ } L V w F~- ~ ~ ~o ~~o H ~ ~ N ~"' to W '`' a Z a r^ ~ Q pV 7.,~ ~ N ~°o ~ ~a~ ~ ~""~ a~ O m F- Q > ~ Q Q a c ~ 0 N N a m °C k N m w m N Y ^ 0 L ~C ^ ~ ~~ ~n NN }t ^^ °'~ ~a 3 ~ rY 00 V ~.~/ ~./ I~- u L vi a 0 U a N w 0 C A ++ ~ ~ O ~ C w ~! ~ L ~1 -~ = C C . L O ~~ Q ^ C L `i ^L I..L a~ U .~ ._ ~ .. U ~'' ~~ ~ 4) ~ ~~ ~ U ~ O U ~ U ~ ca ~ }, O a~ ~~ ~ U ~ ~ •--+ Q o ~ -~ a~ ~ ~~ o ~_ .~-~ . ~ t~ U C~ ~~ O ~ L.L ~ L ~ ~ = L .~ c a~ U U ~ ~ }~i a ~'~~~~~ O _~ •~ to ~ ~ ~~ U N ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ m ~, . +r Q ~ ~ ~ a--~ •~ ~ L ~ -~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o ~ U ~ N Q ~ ~ ~> ~ O ~ ~ CCS ~ ~ a~ O ~ V O ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ L ^. ~~ a-- L ~ ~ C~ ~ 0 L U 0 L +~+ U L ~--i Q Q c~ v~ L.. c~ m ., i' ~~, l!i a~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ O ~ ~ .O U O ~ ~ ~ C~ +r ~ ~ '- Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~' o ~ ~ a ~ ~ U L O L (~ ~~--+ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ - c~ ~ ~ .~ '~ ~ .~ ~ L m U M (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- o a~ U C~ ~ Z ~ . . ~--~ U N a C~ C O N O Q ~--+ _~ ~ _ ~U `~ a--+ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O . ~ ~ ~ O ~ X _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m o ~ ~ L' ~ ~ N ~ ~ = ~ d' ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~-- I U O ~_ ~U O U .~ W on O N a 0 u W Z J Z O H H 0G W d W J d ~lJ Z H m O W Q 6 ~0 O ,,~, ~ ~ O ~~~IIIIII,`~v e~ bA O cd V U 0 x U cd 0 ~~.~ ~~ ~~;~ Oo 4 0 ~ i` I.I- Q 3 s (~~,~ 0 4 vJ ~J v v Q--- i I~ .~ V 0 s 0 S ~J z c~ a~ a~ 0 .~ O U a~ ~U Q V O J '. ,_ :~ ~ _.~ ~~ y .~ .-f . ~f,~! ~~ Y~ s ~~ ~~ ~a s 1~ ~ v ~~~ ~U 0 U V L Q a D U ^^O {..1. U U 0 U L Q W U/ Li. O /~L I..L U D UN f.i U Q 0 U 0 U NN~ I.f~ C N~ I..L W U N .~ V J 0 V c U L ~~~ .~~ L ~--+ 0 V A A A A A A A A A A ^ ~, _ . ~+ ^' ~+ ~--+ W O ~ V~ ~ ~ , _ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ U (~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ c~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U V •~ O ^~ ~ --.~ W a = o ~ ~~ ~ ~ oo ~ s ~ a~ ~ o~ ~ Qo ~ ~~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~_ c~ ~ 'c~ ~ ~ ~ ._ a~ ~ ~~ 0 /~L I..L L ,~L.r-+ w a~ U a~ c~ ^~ U U a~ .> ~--+ ~. O ca •~--+ • ^~ V J _ ~--+ ~ ~ -~ . . . . . . . I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U L ~ ~ o >_ ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ,.`' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o Q ~ ~ ~ U _ .U ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ (~ ~ U ~_ U ~ Q N •- ~ O ~ L ~ ~ ~ . ~ C6 ~ Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ W O .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ U ~ v ~ r ~ ~ ~~ ~.' ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ c ~ L ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~`~ ~ ~ O ~ c a~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ca o c a~ c o a c~~ ~ c~ c ~. N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ Q O O O O O O O O I- ~ ~ F-- F- H H ~ • • • • ~ ~ !%r.~ ~~ -~~. L .~ O U a~ 0 0 C (a N C N c~ 0 a~ m ~.. Q ~~~ ~~ ~~ ; 0 m ^L` W 4 L Q.. "~J 4 \~ V r L J s v° ~v v a~ L L N ~~ U o~ ~a ~ ~ c~ m v ~ a~ U ~ ~~ '~ ~ .~ V Q ~ .~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U O ._ U ~ ~ ~ = O v ~ ~ O `~ ~ ~ ~, U ~ ° ~ ca v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ L ~ ~ _ ~ 0 ~'~~ ~ O `- c N ~ CO O 07 ~ ~ d- c~ o~ ~ ~' o c~ a~ ~ ~~ O ~ ^• O W ~ ~ C~ ~ c~ L ~--+ ~ C!1 V ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ .- O L N ~ pp U 0 M i U O O L 0 W O O U O O N N L .U ~ +r LL ~~ o cn c~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O ~ = c~ U U O U c~ 0 O C~ 00 00 N i I ~ ~ 00 O ~ c~ U ~ O ~ O r- L ~ U N -~ ?~ ~ I ~ ~ O ~ O to O ~ .. ~ `a L .. ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 4) -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~° • . O O ~ ~v ~ o ~ ~ C~ ~ .. ~ O O 00 Q ~ ~ I` N ~ ~ ~-- I..L • • • Z ^~ }^,, W W L ~..~ •..r I ~~ ~ ~ L ^~ ~ ~ W ~ 0 Q U Q~ _ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ C~ w ~ L 0 ~_ • V~ ~ ~ c~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ •- W .~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ .W ~--+ ~--+ .~ U .~ .~ ~--+ ._ L .U 0 ^~+ W .~ 0 -~ U L .~ a~ a~ L c~ ~L -1--+ L N O ~ (/~ ~ ~ ~ c~ > ~ ~- o o :~ •..+ - - ~ ~ o ~ ~~ A~ W L } ~ ~ U7 ~ j C "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~ O ~ _ ~ CD 0 0 0 F~F~ ~J^^,1 ~C n 01 C O v U C n m U (d 0.. N CD U 7 O E ~ ~ a--~ C N N U L W N O U C (0 C~ O N U .~ N N N U_ O .~ i U • 00 ti ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ti U_ ~ ~ oN O 0 v~ 0 a~ O 0 0 a~ O W .. .v ~,~.~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ U - ~ ~- ~ ~ U ~ _ ~ ~ Cn ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- X > } ~ 0 ,, U ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ o ~ O 4) t -`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cn ~ c~ v ~ V > C~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • a~ U .~ N L U ~' ~t'~ O O O O O O N ~ ~ t~ ~ M O ti O N 0 0 N O 0 N "P~ ~ 'i'. a: f.:~~ "~1 :_~' } N N -~~,; _ _ -- ~; . r N - ~~ ~ f ~st.+ ~R~ i '_ ~f _ ~~,~.. -~: W 07 M ~ ~ ~ M M O~0 ONO ~ r L ~ O y V ~ ~ ~ > ~V J V1 d .y m i G~ t O y ~ ~ +_+ `~ 'L^ V v ._ ~ ' V C Q. O L a. O O _ O M O O N O _ O O N O O _ ~ r O _ O O _ .O^ y - O i ~, L Q ~~ ~C` I! z ''~ ~- r ~~~. --~~ ~ _. ~. may. . r r ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,, ~ `r.~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ •l ~ -~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ I ` V ~~ .~.~• ~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ O r~~~ • ~ ~ ~- ' ;' ~ °' ~ ~~ ~ . ,-, .o ~ ~ ~ .,~ ~ 00 •'~ ~' O '~ °~ O ~ '~ ~N ~~ • ~~ f1 C~ -- ~ QN ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~, `~ 4~ ~ ~ I W ~ =~ •+' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) ~ ~ 4~ ~ 0 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ `'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ O °' o ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ U o~" o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v ,~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ `~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~~ .~ !~j w ~~ ~V '1~1 O ~~ ~ ~~~~ o~~°~o ~~~~ O ~; ~ . ~0 ~ ~ ., Q -~ N *~ ~ o ~~ .~~o o ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~o~ .~ ~ ~ .~ ~~~~ 4~ ~ N ~ ~ o~ ~ o `,~ ~ •N ~, _~ (~ ~ ~ ~ 4) a~ ~ U L ._ ~-- ~ ~ U W Q ~ ti ~o 00 UN U C~ .~ 0 0 U a~ ._ -}L-+ .~ .~ a a~ L w ~. L c~ Q C7 U ,~~ -~--+ L O ~ ~ ~ W ca a~ U O U a~ O O 0 .~ Z 0 3 0 C U C (0 C W 0 a. L ~-+ 0 L 0 I..L~ .~ ~~/ I..L c~ U .~ 0 x w V C~ ~_ L 0 .o .~- c~ ._ .U O 0 0 0 O ~--+ L 0 0 O a~ V C~ .~ O a~ Cn c~ _.. - - ~ •--~ O ~ ~ L Q 0 m ~ U ~ ~ ~--+ •~ ~ ~ ~ (~ U O c~ - O •- ~ ~ O L ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ._ - ~ ~, ~ ~~ o c~ ~ ~ L ~ c~ ~ .~' a~ ~ ~ U_ _ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ . ~ > N O ~ U -+~ ~ ~ O N • ~ ~ ~ cn +r C ~~ ~ Q Q . +~ . U ~ ~ ~ / t .Y: J ~" a V (,~ r L ~- O p _ ^^ L.L .~ ,.. Q °~o ~ W ~ ~- Q V Qom ~ ~~Q ~~z 02ZW~ QN° VOF-J ~ ~Q J QJ~ V~V~~ p~Qa W W C' ~ ~ ,~ - 0 N ~r C~ JJ ~ Ja d v r~ d U ~ I 'r .,~!~ ~ ~<.! _ _ ~~ i w ... ~:~ 1 0 t~ Oo ~~ 0 a o ~ ~ L ~E-- ~ ~. Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ c ~ ~ ~ > ~ o U O o ~ a .N -v Q. ~ O i +r ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O N i• ~ ,i ~ o V > ~ C (~ L to ~ L ~ ~ ~ O ~ L W ~ ~ /5.. v z ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ s ~ ~ c U U ~ a~i o. ~ m ~ •Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ f1) U V - C (p N !!) O O O o ~ ~ O C ~ ~ ~ ~. Q. ~ (.~ W V1 W W W D ~ ~ • • • ~ i~ r~ (6 L 0 /~L I..L O ._ ~--+ U a~ •~ CCS Cn ._ ._ E Q .~ a~ c~ .~ L -_ ~U O U ~~ 00 U U y-- O O N .> N O U ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ L .~..~ C~ ~ C~ O a~ a~ 0 .,?~~ ~- a~ Uo as ~ o° .O ~-• C~ O U ~' 4) N a~ a~ 0 .~ ._ C~ -+L .~ ._ ca C6 .. ._ .~ U c~ .~ ~_ ~L U ~ ~ m~ . ~ cn -- ~~ o a~ •- ~. ~ X C~ U ~_ ~ •- O U ._ U .~ O U A N N L N C .~ 0 ~ C i ~ N ~ ~~ L- Uo .~ ~ _ ~ ~_ -- O U .~ .~ O U O a~ U U O ~--+ c~ .o c~ -F .~.~ c~ o ~~ .~ O .~ i- 1 N (t3 N C O ~ ~ C U L'~ ~ ~.~ ~U +V1-. N +~ +~ Q7.,_. N C'L O C ~ N ~ U~~ ~ O S N ?r' 3Q c ~ ~ ~~ LN O s ~ ~~ ~,.~ ~ O w N_ ~ C > `~ ~ti v ~ NO ~~ ~ti ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,o ,.., ~ ~ ~ ~~ =o E~ c~ wrn .3 UU ~U ~~ ~+ a~ O O •c ~ p Ca 'CCN y'U d Q~ ~ ~ ='~ N ~ C ~ N V O C . O ~ ~ _.. O 'QN ~~ w(a O .~. 04~ L c~ '~ ~ y~ ~ oN 3 ..___. U O o o ~- ~o yU ~_ wC0 ~v~ ""° _ :~' H ~ ~ C ~ > ~p V ~ C (~ ~ ~ ~ CN w~0 ~~~ d NC O~~ OOO OC •- 0 vOiO ~~~ bv~C ~ ~ p aC ~ ~ ~'~ N =``_ ~o ~oOOQ Q~~ ~`l~ 0 ~- ~ 3 3~0 ~~ O E a.r Up (p~N O `'" `- CN OC~O W ~ ac.cn O~ ~ ~.> ~ L U~ O •'= .~ U ~" c c .~~ ~~o ~~ ~~~ O U O > ~ +~ L ~ C ~~ a~W c~ ~ O C~ 0 .~~ ~~U pC ~~O V ~~ ~- ~ ~o~ ~c ~ Oct O U t N .~. ~ •Q O ;~ p a~ d ~QUU ~ O C ~3~ COO OOca ~~ ~ Z N ~~ ~ ~~~ y,,, ~ `~ w cCa ~ ~•- ~}'~ Co c ~ c~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ 3 ~ Oc~ C~C V. y- ~ 'D ~ VC G~>+ ~'- ~-0 CN wL ~ ~C~ti ~ v, ~ mEN ~O 3 y-~a c0» ~~ 1 C~ ~ •• ~ O ~ ~ •- O O •~ ._ •- C~ ~ U +~ L ~ ~ U o ~ o ~ - o L ~ U V L ~ ~ O ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W L O O o ~, ~ ~ ~ o U U O ~ ~ .- •~ ~ Q L ~. ~ • - ~ O ~ ~ ~ U o x U o ~ U m ~ ._ ~ .> ~ ~ U ~ ~ c~ O v O ~ ~ U 0 o U C~ N V L ~+ .~ N N ti ti .-. 0 a~ O ~~1thv RC ~'OL r 1'.~°e.:..,~P Free we,Le a~..~~ - - City Hall . VG Cultural Center . Animal Center Community Centers Libraries . Fire Stations . Other City-Owned Facilities . All City Parks and Plazas Trails Playgrounds Creating a Healthy RC For You!