HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/03/19 - Agenda Packetr
~,
10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS
15~ and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M.
MARCH 19, 2008
MEMBERS
MAYOR
MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
L. Dennis Michael
Rex Gutierrez
Sam Spagnolo
Diane Williams
CITY MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
Jack Lam, AICP
James L. Markman
Debra J. Adams, CMC
ORDER OF BUSINESS
CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M.
`~ INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC -
~ ` CU~ ONGA
TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to
speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,
you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views
of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from
clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City
Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table
and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or
not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public
Hearing' item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the
agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the
agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public
hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion
of the agenda has been completed.
Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library
and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access.
Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City
has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 19, 2008
1
A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM
1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth
Mayor Pro Tem Michael
Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams
CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE
CITY COUNCIL AND THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S~
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
F. RECESS
CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL,
LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 19, 2008
2
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO
CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE
AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth
Mayor Pro Tem Michael
Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamations to Carmen Moreno and Eunice Hill in recognition of their
being named the 2007/08 Outstanding School Crossing Guards of the Year.
2. Presentation for the House Raffle Committee in recognition of their work to support the PAL
Campaign and Certificates of Achievement for the Members of the Raffle Team.
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency,
Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.
State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not
previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by
the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All
communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council,
not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy
and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and
speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the
decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of
the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to
speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and
no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing
items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other
public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may
resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
_ MARCH 19, 2008
3
J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES
TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to
comments made by the general public.
K. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by an Agencymember for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting)
2. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, for the total amount ~
of $811,917.48.
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. 2
4. Approval to accept the Stadium Outfield Fence Replacement Project, Contract No. RA 08- ~ g
003 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the Acting
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $54,105.45.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-004 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE STADIUM OUTFIELD
FENCE REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA 08-003 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORKS
L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Boardmember for discussion.
5. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting)
6. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, for the total amount 22
of $103,320.80.
7. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. 26
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4
_ MARCH 19, 2008
8. Approval to adopt a boundary map showing Parcel Number 0201-043-45 (Douglas & Linda 31
Andresen), 9991 Snowdrop Rd., to be annexed into CFD 88-1.
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-009 33
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE. PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING A
BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
9. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 35
88-OS-1 (APN: 0201-043-45, Douglas & Linda Andresen), into Community Facilities District
No. 88-1, specifying facilities and services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to
be levied within the annexation and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the
annexation.
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-010 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember for discussion.
10. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting)
11. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, and payroll ending 45
March 11, 2008, for the total amount of $3,734,849.46.
12. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. 75
13. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citvwide Street
Name Sian Replacement, Phase 6, to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5300, as approved 84
in the FY 2007/08 budget.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5
_ MARCH 19, 2008
RESOLUTION NO. 08-058 ~ 85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
14. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of 89
Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations, to be funded from Transportation
Funds, Acct. Nos. 1 1 2430 3-5650/1 582 1 24-0, 1124303-5650/1591124-0, 1124303-
5650/1592124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-059 91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
15. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 07108 Local 96
Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure "I"
Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/10922176 and Prop. 42 Funds, Acct. No. 1190303-
5650/1022190.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-060 98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2007/2008 LOCAL STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS
IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
16. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Metrolink Railing 103
Re-Paint Project, to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District 3B Funds, Acct. No.
1133303-5304.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-061 105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE METROLINK RAILING RE-PAINT
PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
17. Approval of a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home" organization for the waiver of Central Park 110
room rental fees for a fundraising event to be held on April 6, 2008.
R
A
GENCY,
EDEVELOPMENT
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 19, 2008
RANCxo
CUCAMONGA
18. Approval of a recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission to rename the 112
Arrow Route Center.
19. Approval of a recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission to implement a 116
Non-Profit Organization Facility Use Eligibility Policy.
20. A{~proval of Community Services Update Report. 123
21. Af~proval of a Request from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AOMD) fora 132
Waiver of Rental Fees for use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on Friday, May 9th and
Saturday May 10th, 2008, to conduct their Electric Lawn Mower Exchange Event.
22 . P{~proval of a request from the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail for use of City equipment 133
and marketing support for their Bike-A-Thon to be held May 10, 2008.
23 . Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and setting of 136
public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2008/2009
for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate
is proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-062 138
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S
ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE
PROPOSED.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-063 139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO
24 . Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of 141
public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2008/2009
for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of
assessment rate is proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-064 143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S
ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~
_ MARCH 19, 2008
RESOLUTION NO. 08-065 ~ 144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 200812009 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
25. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of 146
public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 200812009
for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of
assessment rate is proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-066
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S
REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A,
36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE
PROPOSED.
RESOLUTION NO. OS-067
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
26. Approval of an Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) for storm drain
improvements for Parcel Map 16141, located south of 9`h Street, east of Madrone Avenue,
submitted by HC Vineyard, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-068
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (DRA-37) FOR STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS FROM HC VINEYARD, LLC
27. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract
in the amount of $3,135,980.00 to the apparent low bidder, Mike Bubalo Construction
Company, Inc. (CO 08-024), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $313,598.00 for the Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement
Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to SunFlower Street, to be funded from Drainage Funds,
Acct. No. 1112303-565011505112-0 and Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-
5650/1505176-0.
148
149
151
153
154
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
_ MARCH 19, 208
8
28. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation (CO 08-025) to 165
provide engineering services for the design of traffic signals at four locations and the design
of signal synchronization system and coordination timing at twelve intersections in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. Numbers: 1124303-
5650/1042124-0, 1124303-5650/1624124-0, 1124303-565011625124-0, 1124303-
5650/1626124-0, and 1124303-5650/1643124-0, and approve an appropriation in the
amount of $64,000.00 to Acct. No. 1 1 24 303-565011 6321 24-0.
29. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract
in the amount of $83,243.00 to the apparent low bidder, Wheeler Paving, Inc. (CO 08-026), 168
and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,324.30 for the
Jasper Street/Orchard Street Sidewalk Improvements (around Stork Elementary School), to
be funded from Beautification Funds, Acct. No. 1110316-5650/1661110-0.
30. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2005-00086, located 175
at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4'" Street, submitted by Trico TCH, Ltd.
31. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2003-00869, located at the 177
southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6'" Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Co.
32. Approval to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 16167, located on the 179
southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9'" Street, submitted by On Vineyard, LLC.
N. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second
readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or
Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the
title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or
Councilmember.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 181
DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the
Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub
area 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-02, 03,
04, O5, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635,
Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An
Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the
Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the City Council for final action.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 19, 2008
9
ORDINANCE NO. 790 (second reading) 181
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO
WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF
FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU)
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03,
04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14
O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
1. PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REGARDING HEALTHY 211
CITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 08-069 213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE HEALTHY CITIES
MODEL AND INDICATING INTENT TO SUPPORT PARTICIPATION IN
CALIFORNIA HEALTHY CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
2. REPORT ON CRIME ANALYSIS (PowerPoint presentation)
P. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per
Councilmember.)
2. CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION FOR 219
APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION BOARD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 19, 2008
10
Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING.
R. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 13, 2008,
seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
February 20, 2008
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL
CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday,
February 20, 2008, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by PresidentMayor Donald J.
Kurth. M.D.
Present were Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane
Williams, and PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; and John Gillison, Deputy City
Manager/Administrative Services.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
PresidenUMayor Kurth announced the closed session items:
61. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW
ROUTE AND I-15 FREEWAY; LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY -City
B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA &
STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S)
No one was present to comment on the closed session items.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:35 p.m.
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 2
F. RECESS
The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken.
•____,
G. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City
Council was held on Wednesday, February 20, 2008, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located
at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Ranchc Cucamonga, California. Chairman/President/Mayor Donald J.
Kurth, M.D. called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.
Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane
Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael, and
Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
Also present were: Jack Lam, Executive Director/City Manager; James `Markman, Legal Counsel/City
Attorney; Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst; Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II;
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs Manager; James C.
Frost, City Treasurer; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Lorraine Phong,
Sr. Information Services Analyst; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Services Specialist; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy
City Manager/Community DevelopmenUlnterim City Engineer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Dave
Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Jeff Barnes, Parks/Landscape Maintenance
Superintendent; Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent; Ernie Ruiz, Streets Superintendent; Julie
Ungashick, Management Analyst II; Sandy Mellem, Secretary; James Troyer, Planning Director; Rina
Leung, Senior Planner; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Kurt Keating, Code Enforcement
Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Community
Services Superintendent; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing
Manager; Susan Sluka-Kelly, Community Services Supervisor; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III;
Patrick Hediger, Community Services Coordinator; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu,
Assistant Library Director; Captain Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter
Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk; and Debra J.
Adams, Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk.
.._..~
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
H1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Nacho Gracia, Executive Director, Northtown Housing
Development Corporation, in recognition of his retirement.
The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to Nacho Gracia.
Mr. Gracia thanked the City Council and staff for their support through the years. He also recognized his
family and members of his organization that were present.
The Councilmembers expressed their thanks to Mr. Gracia for all he has done for the community.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 3
H2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Los Osos High School in recognition of receiving the
"America's Best High School Silver Award."
The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to Principal Chris Hollister and Student Leaders
Amanda Buchanan, Corey Burns, Tiana Okoye and Matt Sanders.
Principal Hollister stated the award was given to them based on test scores that had been submitted.
H3. Presentation of a musical number and announcement of the opening of the upcoming Rancho
Cucamonga Community Theatre production of "The Secret Garden," to be held at the Lewis Family
Playhouse, February 29 -March 9, 2008.
Susan Sluka-Kelly, Community Services Supervisor, and Patrick Hediger, Community Services
Coordinator, introduced the production of "The Secret Garden" and introduced a number from the
production.
H4. Councilmember Williams stated there is an event to be held Friday, February 22nd at the Paul
Biane Library celebrating Black History Month. She encouraged the public to attend.
Deborah Clark, Library Director, stated they are excited about their 2nd Annual Black History Month
celebration. She explained the program for the evening. She staled this is a free event and encouraged
the public to attend. She stated it is from 7:00 p.m. - 9 p.m.
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS.
11. Jim Frost mentioned the Run for the Wall event to take place over the Memorial Day weekend with
hundreds of motorcycles riding from Victoria Gardens to Washington D.C. He presented a video
pertaining to this, which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
12. Jim Moffatt stated he was impressed with the "Secret Garden" presentation. He asked why the
Council was banning smoking at City facilities and around City Hall to protect the children, but why
smoking was allowed at Quakes Stadium. He mentioned Mayor Kurth's fundraiser and felt he had quite a
following. He didn't understand the smoking allowed at the stadium where there are kids allowed.
13. Pat Sloman, Relay for Life and CPS3, stated on April 12th there will be a 24 hour event to help find a
cure for cancer. She stated it will run from 10:30 a.m, - 2:30 p.m., and invited the Council to attend. She
stated the event will be held at Los Osos High School.
14. Cindy Runge wanted to speak about the Ftelay for Life itself. She stated this is a 24 hour relay to
raise funds to prevent cancer and support cancer research. She stated it is April 12 and will run for 24
hours. She continued talking about the event. She stated she could be contacted at 987-8854 if there
are any questions. She stated they have a Fire Department team and are looking for a City team and a
Police Department team.
15. Raymond Herrera stated he is the national rally spokesman for the Minuteman Project. He
reminisced about jobs he had as a kid. He displayed a flyer (on file in the City Clerk's office) stating
people could contact hirepatriots.com to get one day to full time jobs. He hoped the City will help tc get
high school students hired in part time jobs. He had a packet of information (also on file in the City
Clerk's office), which he wanted distributed to the Mayor and Council for them to read.
16. John Lyons mentioned the Filippi Winery event promoting Safron Catering at this facility. He
mentioned the rails to trails and its success. He mentioned Nacho Gracia and how he has worked with
him and thanked him for his years of service. He stated he was a great guy.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 4
17. Fred Guibara commented on the littering of driveways with advertising materials including materials
from bark of landscapers, washers from plumbers, and notepads from realtors. He didn't think we wanted
this in our City. He didn't think these types of materials should be left on driveways, and felt people
should be mailing their materials to advertise. He felt it was poor for our City to allow this.
J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES
TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
James Markman, City Attorney, stated littering is a penal code violation when you discard something that
is considered garbage. He stated these various forms of advertising are not considered littering. He
stated he is currently looking at an Ordinance that Beverly Hills has, which staff is not sure they want to
adopt, where residents can say they don't want any farm of advertising left in their driveways. He
continued to state the Quakes have in their lease that they can have designated smoking areas within the
stadium and that is why this is allowed.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated the advertising materials left in driveways is an issue the Council has
been talking about and that we are considering adopting an Ordinance like Beverly Hills has as
mentioned by the City Attorney.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated staff does not think this will have a very big impact by adopting this
type of Ordinance.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated what he hears people complaining about is when people are out of town
and the material is left on their driveways with no one to clean it up. He stated he appreciated the
information from the Minuteman Project.
Councilmember Williams stated the Rails to Trails is a great asset to the City and that she uses it
frequently. She stated etiquette on the trail is necessary and that people should walk, ride etc. on the
right hand side of the trail in the direction they are headed. She felt people should be cleaning up after
their dogs to keep it clean. She stated dogs are required to be on a leash. She felt people should be
courteous while on the trails.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated he had a challenge for Rancho Cucamonga High School to put a team
together for the Relay for Life event, and added he will do the same from the high school he attended -
Alta Loma High School. He wondered if there was any connection between people leaving materials on
driveways and at front doors who might be watching a home to see if people are away so they can break
in. He felt this could be discussed in the future and more input could be provided by the Police
Department.
Mayor Kurth mentioned the Run for the Wall event and stated his hat is off to Jim Frost for his efforts. He
stated he would like to ride along for a little ways if he can. He stated people have fought for us so that
we have freedom and that we should all be grateful. He stated he spoke to Filippi Calderon, President
from Mexico, who said every country has the right to protect their borders. Calderon hoped that some
day Mexico will have the same opportunities that Americans do. He stated he appreciated Mayor Pro
Tem Michael's challenge to Rancho Cucamonga High School. He suggested all the high schools do this.
Councilmember Gutierrez thanked Rancho Cucamonga High School for being at the meeting tonight and
also Mr. Eisenbrae for enlightening the students about government.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 5
• K. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~~
K1. Approval of Minutes: February 6, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Michael absent)
K2. Approval of Check Register dated January 30 through February 12, 2008, for the total amount of
$89,164.36.
K3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2008.
K4. Approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Archibald
Library Remodel Project, to be funded by an appropriation from Fund 640 Fund balance to Acct. No.
2801640/5650.
RESOLUTION NO. RA OS-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD LIBRARY
REMODEL PROJECT" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Michael to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
...,.<
L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
L5. Approval of Minutes: February 6, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Michael absent)
L6.. Approval of Check Register dated January 30 through February 12, 2008, for the total amount of
$145,950.53.
L7. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2008.
L8. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District
No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-07-2 (Lions Pride Development-APN: 0201-043-53).
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A
SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1,
ANNEXATION NO. 88-07-2
L9. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District
No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-11 (6`" & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC -APN: 0209-211-41)
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A '
SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1,
ANNEXATION NO. 07-11
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Spagnolb to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
M. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL
M10. Approval of Minutes: February 6, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Michael absent)
M11. Approval of Check Register dated January 30 through February 12, 2008, and payroll ending
February 12, 2008, for the total amount of $3,551,802.16.
M12. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2008.
M13. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the construction of the
Banyan Community Trail from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Beautification
Funds, Acct. No. 1110316-5650/1613110-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM
AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
M14. Approval to increase contract spending limit for Brodart, Inc. by $213,000 to provide additional
book materials and processing services for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library as budgeted in the
2007/08 approved budget, located in Library Acct. 12906065200 ($200,000 to replace dated material),
and in Library Acct. 12906065300 ($13,000 for book processing and technical services).
M15. Ppproval of Community Services Update Report.
M16. Approval for the purchase of a 600 kW generator including an automatic transfer switch and
sound attenuation package from Generator Services of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in the amount of
$135,240.26 and authorize an expenditure of $20,000 for the relocation of the Generator Exhaust System
from Acct. No. 1712001-5603 and appropriate $55,240 into Acct. No. 1712001-5603 from Fund balance.
M17. , Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
amending Section 1, Exhibits "D" Through "F" of Resolutions Number 06-209 and 06-238B to include new
classifications and adjust rates of affected part-time positions to comply with the new State Minimum
Wage Law.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 06-238C
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1, EXHIBITS "D"
THROUGH "F" OF RESOLUTIONS NUMBER 06-209 AND 06-2386 TO
INCLUDE NEW' CLASSIFICATIONS AND ADJUST RATES OF
AFFECTED PART-TIME POSITIONS TO COMPLY WITH THE NEW
STATE MINIMUM WAGE LAW
M18. Approval of a contract change order and award to AKM Consulting Engineers (CO 05-056) for
additional Master Plan services for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage, to be
funded from Acct. No. 1116303-5650/1662116-0 (Fund 116 -Etiwanda Drainage) for the amount of
$65,450, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,550, and to appropriate
$72,000 to Fund 116 -Etiwanda Drainage (Acct. Nc. 1116303-5650/1662116-0).
M19. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for DRC2005-00852, located at
6795 Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Thomas G. Montes.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2005-00852
M20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 17455, located on the north side of 9'"
Street, east of Madrone Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-039
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 17455
M21. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for
DRC2004-01051 located on the west side of Red Oak Street, between Civic Center Drive and Aspen
Avenue, submitted by the Kiwanis CAL-NEV-HA Foundation.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-040
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-01051 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
M22. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance bond, accept a Maintenance
bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16445, located on the north side of
Sixth Street, about 1,000 feet east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Chang Revocable Trust.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16445 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 8
M23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 17318, located at the northeast
corner of 4~" Street and Utica Avenue, submitted by Investment Development Services, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 17318 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
M24. Approval to accept improvements and file a Notice of Completion for a portion of the landscape
improvements within Tract 15982-1 located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, east side of Day Creek
Boulevard and both sides of Blackstone Drive, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
M25. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for a portion of the landscape
improvements, areas served by controllers A and B, for Tract 16227, located on the north side of Day
Creek Boulevard between Indian Wells Place and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by BCA Development.
M26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16776, located on the north side of Base
Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Van Daele Communities,
LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16776 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
M27. Approval to release Maintenance Bond No. 190017194/104809466, which was held on February
7, 2007, in the amount of $34,462.39, for Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel
12 KV Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, Contract
No. 05-048.
M28. Approval to accept the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain from San Sevaine Channel to 1900' east of
Etiwanda Avenue Project, Contract No. 07-126 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a
Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approval the final contract amount of $916,918.89.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN FROM SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL TO
1900' EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE PROJECT,.CONTRACT NO. 07-
126 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
M29. Approval to accept the La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard
Drainage Improvements project, Contract No. 07-208 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond
as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $189,688.66.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 08-045
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LA SENDA AND
ETIWANDA CHANNEL ACCESS RAMPS AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CONTRACT
NO 07-208, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
N. CONSENT ORDINANCES
N1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-
00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the zone on 0.40 acres of land from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial, located 7388 Carnelian Street,
south of Base Line Road on the west side of Carnelian Street -APN: 0207-022-07.
ORDINANCE NO. 787 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 0.40 ACRE OF LAND,
LOCATED AT 7388 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0207-022-07
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 787.
MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
787. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
N2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00810 - F/S
MOTORSPORTS. INC. (GEORGE REYNOSOI - A request to amend the Development Code, Section
17.30 to allow auto sales and leasing, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, in the General Industrial (GI)
District, Subarea 1, a development district located west of Vineyard Avenue, generally between 8th Street
and Arrow Route, and east of Grove Avenue.
ORDINANCE NO. 788 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2007-00810 - A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION
17.30.030 AND TABLE 17.30.030 TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SALES
AND LEASING, SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 1; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 0207-022-07; 0207-262-
19, -21, -24, -28, -35, -36, -41, -42, -43, -45 THROUGH -51, -59; 0207-
251-10; 0207-541-60; 0207-252-92 AND -93; 0207-271-14, -23, -25, -27,
-28, -31, -33, -39, -40, -42, -46, -47, -49 THROUGH -52, -56, -57, -58, -
60 THROUGH -78
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 10
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title or Ordinance No. 788.
MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
788. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
01. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS DRC2007-00495 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Sections 14.08.350, 14.16.010(P), and 16.14.020
and adding Chapter 14.25 to the Municipal Code concerning temporary signs. This action is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
ORDINANCE NO. 789 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 14.08.350,
14.16.010(P) AND 14.16.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 14.25 TO THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING
TEMPORARY SIGNS
ORDINANCE NO. 787 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 0.40 ACRE OF LAND,
LOCATED AT 7388 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-022-07
A staff report and power point were presented by Rina Leung, Senior Planner, which is on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael asked why the Planning Commission felt two signs should be allowed per parcel
as opposed to one sign.
James Troyer, Planning Director, stated it was because the realtors felt it was better for visibility.
James Markman, City Attorney stated on page 173 "A." states up to two signs, and stated it should read
no more than two signs. He stated any signage allowed would also apply to political signs, and that this
would hopefully clean up all signage particularly in the right-of-way and no more than two signs of any
subject matter on any parcel. He felt this was an enforceable Sign Ordinance.
Councilmember Spagnolo stated he and Councilmember Gutierrez worked on this as a Subcommittee,
and wanted this to be as fair as possible. He felt by allowing two signs per candidate per parcel was
taking us back where we were before.
Dennis stated he was concerned about signs other than political signs being allowed to be up for more
than 45 days.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 11
James Markman, City Attorney stated you can change it as long as the political signs are not more
restrictive. He stated you could add language so that signs pertaining to an election event could only be
up 45 days, but signs for any other event could only be up a certain number of days before the event, and
didn't think this would matter.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael asked about businesses that put up grand opening signs and asked if this would
apply.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated no that it is a separate ordinance.
Councilmember Williams thought yard sale signs were only allowed to be up for one day.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated that regulation was to only allow so many yard sales per year.
Mayor Kurth asked about the animated signs being allowed.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated they are not allowed in the public right-of-way either.
Councilmember Williams felt this would be a big mess by regulating the animated signs. She didn't feel
the Police Department should be trying to regulate these.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated it will be Code Enforcement that will work to regulate this. He stated one
of their goals was to control the amount of yard sale signs a person can put up. He felt this was a step in
the right direction.
Councilmember Williams asked if this applied to billboards.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated it does not.
Councilmember Williams asked where a realtor can put a sign to advertise for an open house and stated
their business depends on this.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated if you allow open house signs in the right-of-way you would have
to allow political signs in the right of way.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated this is not to inhibit businesses. He stated certain types of signs could
not be discriminated against when they developed the guidelines for this ordinance.
Councilmember Williams stated she was concerned about using City money to take down all the political
signs that professional sign companies put up.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City has never received a complaint from a candidate that had their
sign taken out of the right-of-way.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael felt we are doing this because of the political signs.
Councilmember Spagnolo stated this is also for all the signs that are taped on power poles and telephone
polls too. He stated this has to be fair and balanced for everybody.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated our current regulations are not enforceable.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt this ordinance would be much easier to enforce than the no smoking
ordinance.
Councilmember Williams asked what happens if a sign is taken down by the City
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 12
James Markman, City Attorney, stated they should also be issued an administrative citation.
A recess was taken at 9:01 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:14 p.m. with all members
present.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt we could overcome the objections involved with this, but that we needed an
ordinance to meet our objectives. He felt we needed something legitimate.
Mayor Kurth opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Jim Moffatt felt the Code Enforcement officer needed more ammunition and that those that do not follow
the ordinance should be fined. He felt there should be some meat to the sign ordinance. He felt people
should be charged and not given their sign back if they do not follow the ordinance.
John Lyons felt some people might risk paying the fine and put out more and more signs just to win the
election. He felt it would be a conflict of interest for the City Council to put out signs and that they already
have an advantage in the election. He didn't feel real estate agents were doing anything wrong that they
are just trying to sell a house. He asked the Council not to vote for this ordinance as is. He felt real
estate signs should not be covered by this ordinance.
Ryan Smith, Government Affairs for the Board of Realtors, commended staff they had worked with on
this. He stated he didn't really feel this would change the sign regulations from what they are. He hoped
people that want to sell their homes are not hurt by this ordinance.
Michael Dubay stated he is also upset about the signs all over the place. He commented on politicians
that leave their signs up after the election is over. He said people ask them to do open houses and that
he and most realtors pick up their signs from one day and then put them out again the next. He hoped
the Council will work with them and not stop them from putting out their open house signs.
Key Nador stated some times there is not a place to put a real estate sign other than the right-of-way.
She asked that the agents be allowed to do this.
Robert Radford, Liberty Tax Service, felt there are many types of violations in the City that aren't being
taken care of. He said he is providing jobs to kids that dress in costume to advertise his business.
Linda Moore, realtor, said they need the public right-of-way to put their signs for open houses and asked
the Council what they can do.
There being no further input, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated the current ordinance has many flaws and needed to be cleaned up. He
stated residents are tired of seeing the political signs clutter the City. He said what they discovered
during the development of this ordinance is that certain signs could not be singled out with different
regulations. He stated their objection is not to put anyone out of business, but felt the regulations need to
be in place to enforce. He stated it is not the real estate signs that make the City look bad, that it is some
of the other signs the City has the problem with.
Councilmember Spagnolo stated the Subcommittee has been working on this for about a year and what
is before them to vote on is what they came up with.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael felt people should be elected based on their qualifications, not the number of
signs they put out. He stated he applauded the Subcommittee for their work. He felt one sign per parcel
would be better. He stated he has some concerns about the right-of-way issue, but didn't feel we have
the staff to monitor this completely. He stated he doesn't have a problem with yard sale or real estate
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 13
signs in the right-of-way, but his concern is that every kind of sign has to be treated equally. He asked if
signs on telephone, utility boxes, etc., could be restricted from any form of advertisement no matter what
the content.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated if all content is treated the same way you could do this.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated he wasn't sure we could completely eliminate the public right-of-way
100%, but hoped we could add some more analysis on the right-of-way options as mentioned above. He
stated he also has concerns on the 45 days for political signs.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would be willing to visit this again with the intention of not having
signs whatsoever on utility boxes, poles, etc., and limiting the number of signs on a parcel of land per
block.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated this could be returned to the Subcommittee to work on this further.
Councilmember Williams agreed with the suggestions submitted, and stated if a sign is not attached to a
pole, box, etc., that as long as it is free standing, it could be allowed. She felt signs in the median should
not be allowed at all. She asked if the Subcommittee would go back and work a little more on this.
Mayor Kurth stated he is tired of seeing all the signs all over the City and felt other people are tired of
them too.
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to refer the item back to the Subcommittee to
continue working on this issue with the suggestions discussed. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
P1. INTRODUCTION OF CITY PUBLIC WORKS STAFF AND OVERVIEW OF DIVISION
Dave Blevins, Public Works Superintendent, introduced the staff present (Sandy Mellem, Secretary; Julie
Ungashick, Management Analyst II; Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent; Ernie Ruiz, Streets
Superintendent; and Jeff Barnes, Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent). He also told about
their positions within the department.
The Council stated they are proud of the work that everyone does.
P2. PRESENTATION OF THE FIRST PHASE OF THE WORKFORCE HOUSING MARKETING
STRATEGY
A staff report and power point presentation were given by Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs
Manager, which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
The Council felt it was a job well done and was glad we can provide this type of housing to our residents.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael felt we have done a good job so far with this type of housing.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
February 20, 2008
Page 14
Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS
01. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per
Councilmember.)
Councilmember Spagnolo thanked the Council for their input on the sign ordinance, and stated he and
Councilmember Gutierrez will go back and continue working on this.
Councilmember Williams mentioned the incredible accomplishment of Los Osos High School and
commented on the feeder schools to Los Osos High School. She stated those feeder schools are
preparing the students well for high school.
Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated tomorrow evening at 4:00, the Council is meeting with the Cucamonga
Valley Water District at Central Park for a joint meeting.
Mayor Kurth felt we have the best City in the whole world
R. IDENTIFICATION'OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified far the next meeting.
,._.,.
S. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk
Approved: '
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00263949 2/27/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,320.50
AP - 00263949 2/27/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 210.00
AP - 00263951 2/27/2008 ASSI SECURITY 618.00
AP - 00263955 2/27/2008 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A., T 142,797.00
AP - 00263955 2/27/2008 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A., T 557,203.00
AP - 00263955 2/27/2008 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A., T -3,941.39
AP - 00264033 2/27/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,403.67
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 220.89
AP - 00264040 2/27/2008 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,500.00
AP - 00264051 2/27/2008 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 4,995.00
AP - 00264053 2/27/2008 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 45,601.46
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00264082 2/27/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 823.40
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 175.00
AP - 00264125 2/27/2008 RRM DESIGN GROUP 8,406.11
AP - 00264178 2/27/2008 VAN GAALEN LOCK & KEY 305.75
AP - 00264200 2/27/2008 WORLD ECONOMIC DEV ALLIANCE & BDO MA 4,950.00
AP - 00264295 3/5/2008 FARAH INC, ELIE 5,600.00
AP - 00264343 3/5/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 2,461.00
AP - 00264347 3/5/2008 LEE COMPOSITES INC 10,229.52
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3,076.91
AP - 00264381 3/5/2008 ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL 4,364.50
AP - 00264434 3/5/2008 SIGN SHOP, THE 91.06
AP - 0026444] 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,754.40
AP - 00264458 3/5/2008 TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES 9,522.50
Total for Check ID AP: 811,917.48
Total for Entit}': 8] 1,917.48
P1
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 14:52:4
452,768.22
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Investments Par
Value Market
Value Book
Value % of
PoMollo
Term Days to
Maturity YTM
360 Equiv. YTM
365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Fund 38,013,134.54 38,013,134.54 38,013,134.54 20.44 1 1 4.104 4.161
CalTrust Short-Term Fund (JPA) 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 5.38 1 1 3.363 3.410
Certifcates of DeposillNeg: Bank 4,000,000.00 3,999,826.00 4,000,000.00 2.15 34 11 3.000 3.042
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 125,000,000.00 126,469,119.81 124,939,250.00 67.19 1,468 1,106 4460 4.522
Federal Agency Issues-Discount 4,000,000.00 3,999,199.83 3,991,724.44 2.15 28 5 2.866 2.703
Treasury Securities-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,150,00000 5,002,343.75 2.69 6fi1 364 4.654 4.719
166,015,912.43 187,634,058.07 185,949,230.62 100.00% 1,006 754 4.264 4.323
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Subtotal
Total Cash and Investments
z,aaa.aa
455,212.66
186,468, 680.65 188,089,270.73 186,404,443.28
1 1
1,006 754
0.197 0.200
4.264 4.323
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 709,488.22 4,979,296.94
Average Daily Balance 190,026,889.53 162,364,429.51
Effective Rate of Return 4.70°/ 4.59
I certify that this report accurately renects all Agency pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC) - InteractivEData Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of RDA 1, 2004 8 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds as of current month end and Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided
unde Cit ffi t nt Po c e rovlsidns of the individual bon documents govern the management of these funds.
John R. Gi~lison, Treasurer
RepoRing period 0210112008-0212912008
Run Date: 03/1212006 -15:54
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
452,768.22
452,768.22
z,aa4.aa
455.212.66
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6.41.202b
Report Vet. 5.00
N
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management page2
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Average Purchase Statetl ttM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Matudry Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 38,013,134.54 38,013,134.54 38,013,134.54 4.161 4.104 1
Subtotal and Average 3],878,651.78 ]8,01],134.54 38,013,174.54 38,013,1]4.54 4.104 1
CalTrust Short-Term Fund IJPA)
SYS1007 1007 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 02/26/2008 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 3.410 3.363 1
Subtotal and Average 1,379,406.17 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 7.363 1
Certificates of DeposiUNeg -Bank
90531CFF4 1008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 02/07/2008 4,000,000.00 3,999,826.00 4,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 11 03/12/2008
Subtotal and Average ],172,413.79 4,000,000.00 3,999,826.00 4,000,000.00 7.000 11
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
31331VPL8 1002 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2008 5,000,000.00 5,067,187.50 5,000,000.00 3.750 3.699 1,059 01/24/2011
31331 OM79 911 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 3,000,000.00 3,002,812.50 3,000,000.00 3.210 3.186 94 06/03/2008
31331TWH0 935 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 16 03/17/2008
31331XT05 972 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,009,375.00 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,488 03/28/2012
31331XA36 982 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,201,562.50 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,180 05/25/2011
3133XP4P6 1001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/22/2008 5,000,000.00 5,043,750.00 5,000,000.00 3.600 3.551 1,238 07/22/2011
3133XPN6 1011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/21/2008 5,000,000.00 5,034,375.00 5,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 1,360 11/21/2011
3133XJVL9 967 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,188,437.50 3,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,105 03/11/2011
3133XKUH8 981 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,070,000.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,179 05/24/2011
3133XL304 984 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 3,000,000.00 3,105,937.50 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,550 05/29/2012
3133XLAH6 986 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 2,000,000.00 2,018,125.00 2,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,570 06/18/2012
3133%LAFO 987 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,009,062.50 1,000,000.00 5.800 5.523 1,572 06/20/2012
3133XLBS1 988 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,026,250.00 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 848 06/25/2010
3133XMS77 990 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/01/2007 2,000,000.00 2,031,250.00 2,000,000.00 4.870 4.803 1,342 11/03/2011
3133XNVE6 997 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/03/2008 3,000,000.00 3,034,687.50 3,000,000.00 4.500 4.440 1,311 10/03/2011
3133XNVZ9 998 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/07/2008 2,000,000.00 2,021,875.00 2,000,000.00 4.375 4.317 1,315 10/07/2011
3128Xi8D8 903 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 5,007,364.66 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 79 05/19/2008
3128X1JD0 914 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 08/12/2003 3,000,000.00 3,001,952.82 2,999,100.00 3.030 2.995 102 06/11/2008
3128X3FZ1 946 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/28/2004 3,000,000.00 3,007,953.79 2,993,700.00 4.000 4.002 83 05/23/2008
3128XSR75 971 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,011,708.07 998,300.00 5.250 5.217 1,475 03/15/2012
3128X5R75 973 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/04/2007 2,000,000.00 2,023,416.14 1,995,600.00 5.250 5.228 1,475 03/15/2012
3128XSK80 979 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,072,015.38 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,482 03/02/2012
3128X60R0 991 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 11/19/2007 2,500,000.00 2,535,752.49 2,500,000.00 4.500 4.438 628 11/19/2009
3128X6RV0 993 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 12/03/2007 2,500,000.00 2,526,282.50 2,500,000.00 4.320 4.261 1,007 12/03/2010
Run Dete', 03I12000a -1554
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM2)SymRep1641.202b ~
11.3
Report Ver. 5.00
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Matunly
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly'S 360 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3128X6UA2 994 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 12/17/2007 5,000,000.00 5,052,204.89 4,994,450.00 4.250 4.231 1,021 12/17/2010
3128X6VG5 999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 01/09/2008 5,000,000.00 5,073,594.67 5,000,000.00 4.250 4.192 1,409 01/09/2012
31398ANC2 1009 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/11/2008 S,OD0,000.00 5,009,375.00 4,993,000.00 3.125 3.131 1,077 02/11/2011
3136F84J1 1010 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/14/2008 5,000,000.00 5,037,500.00 5,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1445 02/14/2012
3138F8FW0 968 FEDERAL NATL IvTTG ASSN 03/07/2007 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5430 5.356 1,101 03/07/2011
3136FBLU7 976 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,021,875.00 4,996,250.00 5.25D 5.199 1,164 05/09/2011
31398ABC5 977 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 3,000,OD0.00 3,056,250.00 2,996,500.00 5.300 5.239 1,528 05/07/2012
31398ABC5 980 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 1,000,000.00 1,018,750.00 997,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,528 05/07/2012
31398ACL4 963 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,022,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,550 05/29/2012
31398ADF8 985 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4,033,750.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,564 06/17/2012
31398AJK9 989 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/05/2007 3,000,000.00 3,037,500.00 3,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 979 11/05/2010
31398AKV3 995 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,054,687.50 5,000,000.00 4.400 4.340 1,026 12/22/2010
Subtotal antl Average 134,071,545.69 125,000,000.00 126,469,119.81 124,939,250.00 4.460 1,106
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
313396TY9 1006 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 07707/2008 4,000,000.00 3,999,199.83 3,991,724.44 2.660 2.666 5 03/06/2008
Subtotal and Average 11,599,050.18 4,000,000.00 3,999,199.83 3,991,724.44 2.666 5
Treasury Securities -Coupon
912828GJ3 978 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,150,000.00 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 364 02/28/2009
Subtotal and Average 5,002,343.75 5,000,000.00 5,150,000.00 5,002,743.75 0.654 764
Total antl Average 190,026,889.53 186,015,912.43 187,634,058.07 185,949,270.62 4.264 754
Run Oele. 03112/2 000- 15:54
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b ~
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
February 29, 2008
Page 4
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts
SYS744 144 BANK OF AMERICA 452,768.22 452,768.22 452,788.22 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 Accruetl Interest at Purchase 2,444.44 2,444.44 1
Subtotal 455,212.66 455,212.66
Total Cash and lnvestmentss 190,026,889.53 186,468,680.65 188,089,270.73 186,404,443.28 6.264 75d
Run Date; 03/1212006 -15:54
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM216ymRep16.41.202b
CP
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits
Page 5
Retlemptions
or Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 4.161 18,200,000.00 9,000,000.00
Subtotal 28,813,134.54 18,200,000.00 9,000,000.00 38,013,134.54
CalTrust Short-Term Fund (JPA)
SYS7007 1007
CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND
Subtotal 0.00
3.410
10,002,777.89
10,002,777.69
0.00
0.00 10,002,777.89
Certificates of DeposiUNeg.- Bank
90531CFF4 1008
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal 0.00
3.000 02/07/2008 4,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
a.oo
0.00 4,000,000.00
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
31331DK55 904
31331TND9 927
31331TWJ6 936
31331TG62 942
31331XNU2 966
3133XPN6 1011
3133X4087 937
3133XAR25 955
3133XAMW4 957
3128XSC48 965
31398ANC2 1009
3136F84J1 1010
3136F5GP0 934
3136F6Y06 958
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
313384TJ8 1003
313384TJ8 1003
313384TP4 1004
313384TP4 1004
313384TN9 1005
313384TN9 1005
313396TV9 1006
Run Dale: 03112/2009 -1 5.54
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
Subtotal 144,920,075.00
3. 120 02/11/2008 0.00 1,997,500.00
3. 970 02/15/2008 0.00 4,000,000.00
3. 550 02/12/2008 0.00 2,998,125.00
3. 920 02/07/2008 0.00 2,982,000.00
5. 350 02/17/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00
3. 500 02/21/2008 5,000,000.00 0.00
4. 000 02/26/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
4. 080 02/19/2008 0.00 4,000,000.00
4. 000 02/22/2008 0.00 3,999,000.00
5 .375 02/DB/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00
3 .125 02/11/2008 4,993,000.00 0.00
3 .625 02/14/2008 5,000,000.00 0.00
4 .040 02/04/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00
4 .000 02/22/2008 0.00 3,997,200.00
14,993,000.00 34,973,825.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.650 02/19/2008 4,999,263.89 D.00
02/21/2008 0.00 4999,263.89
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.600 02/22/2008 9,997,111.11 0.00
02/26/2008 0.00 9,997,111.11
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.850 02/12/2008 4,995,215.28 0.00
02/25/2008 0.00 4,995,215.28
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 2.660 02/07/2008 3,991,724.44 0.00
124,939,250.00
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) BymRept 6.41.20: ~
RepoN Var. 5.00
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February f, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Dale or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Page 6
Federal Agency Issues • Discount
313588781 1000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.580 02/14/2008 0.00 9,972,155.56
Subtotal 9,972,155.56 23,983,314.72 29,963,745.84 3,991,724.44
Treasury Securities -Coupon
Subtotal 5,002,343.75 5,002,343.75
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 0.00 487,521.05
Subtotal 940,289.27 0.00 467,521.05 d52,768.22
Total 189,647,998.12 71,179,092.61 74,425,091.69 186,401,998.84
Run Dale: OW12/2006- 15:54
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM3)SymRep16.41.20: V
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended January 31, 2008
Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Pavino Aaent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
96 Housing Set-Aside Tax Bank of New York Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2002 VARIOUS 3.14% $ 453.50
Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2006 VARIOUS 3.13% 385.70
Housing Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3/12/2002 VARIOUS 4.00% 0.50
$ 839.70
07 Housing Set-Aside Tax Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Funds 12/31/2007 N/A' 2.92% $ 47,466.34
$ 47,466.34
01 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Money Market Funds 8/22/2001 N/A' 2.58% $ 7,371,529.03
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.58% 7.69
Interest Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.58% 1,432.96
Special Fund Money Markel Funds 9/30/2005 N/A' 2.58% 146,306.09
$ 7,519,275.77
99 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Interest Fund Money Market Funds 2/28/2005 N/A' 2.58% $ 1,316.30
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.58% 2,673.01
Special Fund Money Market Funds 9/30/2005 N/A' 2.58% 0.93
$ 3,990.24
04 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Investment Agreement 12!6/2004 8/27/2032 5.07% $ 12,938,491.70
Interest Fund Money Market Funds 2/28/2005 N/A' 2.57% 2,763.57
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.55% 1,528.86
Special Fund Money Market Funds 9/30!2005 N/A' 2.58% 341,102.10
$ 13,283,886.23
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 20,855,458.28
`Note: These investments are mon ey market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated u pon demand.
tD
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Investments
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
Par Market Book % of Oays to YTM YTM
Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Treasury Severities -SLGS 8,616,680.00 8,676,680.00 8,616,680.00 41.54 341 115 4.910 4.976
Treasury Securities-SLGS Demantl 12,125,514.23 12,125,514.23 12,125,514.23 58.46 1 1 3.050 3.092
20,742,194.23 20,742,194.23 20,742,194.23 100.00% 142 48 3.823 3.876
Investments
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Cu«ent Year 64,309.62 640,635.37
Average Daily Balance 20,747,940.44 21,188,537.42
Effective Rate of Return 3.90% 4.52%
This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated
August 1, 2001. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 0210112008-0212912008
Run Dare: c3r1 vzooe -1s.o3
Portfolio TAB
CP
PM (PRF_PMt) SymRep16.47.202E ~
Report Ver. 5.00 ~
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 365 Maturity Date
Treasury Securities •SLGS
S35583700 133 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,680.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.010 5.010 4 03/05/2008
535584200 134 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.000 5.000 35 04/05/2008
535585190 135 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 4.990 4.990 65 05/05/2008
$35585220 136 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 4.980 4.980 96 06/05/2008
535586010 137 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 808,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.970 4.970 126 07/05/2008
535586120 138 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.963 157 08/05/2008
535586550 139 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.965 188 09/05/2008
535586660 140 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.988 218 10/05/2008
535586670 141 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.930 4.936 249 11/05/2008
535586800 742 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,370.00 608,370.00 608,370.00 4.930 4.934 279 12/05/2008
Subtotal and Aveage 6,787,943.45 8,616,680.00 8,616,680.00 8,616,680.00 4.978 115
Checking Account
SYS125 125 BANK OF AMERICA 07/01/2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1
Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand
SYS143 143 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3.840 3.840 1
SYS144 144 TREASURY SLGS 09/11/2007 1,403,231.88 1,403,231.88 1,403,231.88 3.450 3.450 1
SYS145 145 TREASURY SLGS 10/05/2007 1,857,409.94 1,857,409.94 1,857,409.94 3.200 3.200 1
SYS146 146 TREASURY SLGS 11/05/2007 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 3.080 3.080 1
SYS747 147 TREASURY SLGS 12/05/2007 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2.490 2.490 1
SYS148 148 TREASURY SLGS 01/07/2008 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 2.580 2.580 1
SY5149 149 TREASURY SLGS 02/05/2008 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1.820 1.820 1
Subtotal and Average 11,959,996.99 12,125,514.23 12,125,514.23 12,125,514.23 7.092 1
Total and Average 20,747,940.44
Run Deta: 03/122006 -16:03
20,742,194.23 20,742,194.2) 20,742,194.2)
3.876 46
PoMolio TAB
CP
PM IPRF_PM2)BymRept 6.41.2020 ~
O
Repon Ver. 5,00
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management Page 3
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Staled Transaction Purchases Redemptions Entling
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Ra[e Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 0.00 0.00
Treasury Securities -SLGS
$35583080 132 TREASURY SLGS 5.020 02/05/2008 0.00 1,241,660.00
Subtotal 9,658,340.00 0.00 1,241,660.00 8,616,680.00
Checking Account (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal
0.00
0.00
Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand (Monthly Summary)
SVS149 149 TREASURY SLGS 1.820 1,200,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 10,925,514.23 1,200,000.00 0.00 12,125,614.23
Total 20,783,854.23 1,200,000.00 1,241,660.00 20,742,194.27
Portfolio TAB
C ~
Run Date: 03I12I2006 -16:03 PM (PRF PM3) SymRept 6 d1.20: ~
Report Ver. 5.00
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Investments Par
Value Market
Value Book
Value % of
PoMollo
Term Days to
Matudty YTM
360 Equiv. VTM
J65 Equly.
Local Agency Investment Fund 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 0.20 1 1 4.104 4.161
Wells Fargo Money Market Funtl 73,773,693.39 73,773,693.39 73,773,693.39 99.80 i 1 2.545 2.580
73,922,876.87 73,922,876.87 73,922,876.87 100.00% 7 1 2.546 2.583
Investments
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 154,459.46 1,717,320.14
Average Daily Balance 75,234,069.82 77,570,845.36
Effective Rate of Return 2.58% 3.31°
This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated
March 31, 2004. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 0210112008-0212912006 Portfolio TAB4
CP
Run Date: 03/12/2006-16:03 PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept641.202b ~
Repon Ver. 5.00 N
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 2
Averege Purchase Stated YTM Days to maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 4.161 4.161 1
Subtotal and Averege 149,193.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,163.48 4.161 1
Wells Fargo Money Market Fund
SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 73,773,693.39 73,773,693.39 73,773,693.39 2.580 2.580 1
Subtotal antl Average 75,084,886.34 73,773,693.39 73,773,693.39 73,77J,693.39 2.580 1
Total and Average 75,234,069.82
Run Dale: 03/1212008- 16:03
73,922,876.87 73,922,876.87 73,922,876.87
2.583 1
Portfolio TA64
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 6ymRept 6.41 202b ~
W
Report Ver. 5.00
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Page 3
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Beginning
Balance Stated
Rate Transaction
Date Purchases
or Deposits Redemptions
or Withdrawals Ending
Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 149,183.48
149,183.48
Wells Fargo Money Market Fund (Monthly Summary)
SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO
Subtotal 75,131,714.66
2.580
141,978.73
141,978.73
1,500,000.00
1,500,000.00 73,773,693.39
Total 75,280,898.14 141,978.73 1,500,000.00 73,922,876.87
PoRfolio TAB4
C ~
Run Date: 03/122006- 16'03 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6.41.20: A
Repoli Ver. 5 00
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value PoMOlio Tertn Maturity 360 Equiv. 366 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Funds 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.76 77,763,416.76 100.00 1 1 4.104 4.161
77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 100.00% 1 1 4.104 4.161
Investments
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Cu«ent Year 284,540.26 884,216.07
Average Daily Balance 77,763,416.76
Effective Rate of Return 4.60%
This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds Taxable 2007 Series B proceeds in accordance with the
Agency's indenture dated December 1, 2007. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Bow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 02IO1I2008-02129/2008
Run Dete. 03n 212006 - 16:04
Portfolio TA87
CP
PM IPRF_PM115ymRapt 6.41.202b ~
Rep°tl Ver. 5.00 ~
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYS701 701 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT 12/05/2007 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 4.161 4.104 4.161 1
Subtotal antl Average 77,763,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 4.104 4.161 1
Total antl Average 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 4.104 4.161 1
Portfolio TAB7
CP
Run Hate: 03/122006 -16:04
PM (PRP_PM21 $ymRapt 6 41.202b
m
RapMVer.500
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Beginning Statetl 7ransac0on Purchases Redemptions
Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 77,783,416.76
77,783,416.76
Page 3
Total 77,783,416.76 0.00 0.00 77,783,416.76
Run Dale: 03/12/2006 -16:04
Portfolio TAB7
C ~
PM (PRF PM3)SymRept e41.20: V
Regan Ver. 5.00
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintenden `V~
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer J
P18
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: ACCEPT THE STADIUM OUTFIELD FENCE REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT
NO. RA08-003 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE
BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $54,105.45
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency accept the Stadium Outfield Fence
Replacement Project, Contract No. RA08-003, as complete, authorize the Acting City Engineer to
file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond,
authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $53,040.00 six months after
the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $5,410.55 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract
amount of $54,105.45.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the Acting City Engineer.
The Stadium Outfield Fence Replacement Project scope of work consisted of removal and off-site
disposal of existing outfield wood fencing except for vertical posts, preparation of the area around
the site for the construction and installation of wood fence, clean up of construction area and
restore to original condition. Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
Budgeted Amount:
- Account Numbers:
Engineer's Estimate:
RDA's Approval to Advertise:
`: Publish dates for local paper:
~ Bid Opening:
9 Contract Award Date:
Low Bidder:
$100,000.00
2650801-5602
$100,000.00
December 5, 2007
December 11 and December 18, 2007
January 3, 2008
February 6, 2008
New Legacy Corporation
P19
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Stadium Outfield Fence Replacement Project
March 19, 2008
Page 2
Contract Amount:
10% Contingency:
~ Final Contract Amount:
r Difference in Contract Amount:
$53,040.00
$5,310.00
$54,105.45
$1,065.45 (2.01%)
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) Contract Change Orders. The
notable change that was significant to the increase of the Contract was Change Order No. 1 which
provided for the contractor to install a 20" deep concrete footing at the midpoint of an eleven foot
lumber span, and Contract Change Order No. 2 which refunded the contractor for damaged wind
screen material.
~luzri ~J
City Manager/Community Development
MA:TQ:SH/Is
Attachment
P20
ViCINITI( MAP
STADIUM OUTFIELD FENCE REPLACEMENT
CfTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P21
RESOLUTION NO. /~~ Q ~- DD~
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE STADIUM OUTFIELD FENCE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
CONTRACT NO. RA08-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Stadium Outfield Fence Replacement Project, Contract No.
RA08-003, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P22
Aeenda Check Reeister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00263935 2/27/2008 AFSS 50.00
AP - 00263938 2/27/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 48.49
AP - 00263938 2/27/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 146.65
AP - 00263946 2/27/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 899.10
AP - 00263946 2/27/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,245.38
AP - 00263972 2/27/2008 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 48,909.70
AP - 00263978 2/27/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 318.77
AP - 00263988 2/27/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 730.91
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00264003 2/27/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 133.55
AP - 00264024 2/27/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 450.57
AP - 00264024 2/27/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00
AP - 00264031 2/27/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 1,090.35
AP - 00264047 2/27/2008 HOSE MAN INC 58.00
AP - 00264048 2/27/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 9.65
AP - 00264048 2/27/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 11.62
AP - 00264060 2/27/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 1,440.74
AP - 00264060 2/27/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 402.94
AP - 00264067 2/27/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 190.73
AP - 00264067 2/27/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 270.27
AP - 00264068 2/27/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 2,004.15
AP - 00264070 2/27/2008 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 2,608.84
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 235.23
AP - 00264107 2/27/2008 PF SERVICES INC 120.00
AP - 00264107 2/27/2008 PF SERVICES INC 120.00
AP - 00264111 2/27/2008 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 366.28
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 120.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 125.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,371.50
AP - 00264131 2/27/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 274.21
AP - 00264133 2/27/2008 SBCTOA 10.00
AP - 00264139 2/27/2008 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 641.13
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 318.39
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 796.93
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,167.95
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 659.88
AP - 00264148 2/27/2008 SOUTH COAST AQMD 99.09
AP - 00264148 2/27/2008 SOUTH COAST AQMD 266.55
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,338.36
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 796.49
AP - 00264]56 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,163.92
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,737.26
AP - 00264164 2/27/2008 TEAM THOMPSON 140.00
AP - 00264169 2/27/2008 TOLL, RICHARD 50.00
AP - 00264171 2/27/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82
AP - 00264178 2/27/2008 VAN GAALEN LOCK & KEY 305.76
AP - 00264183 2/27/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.26
AP - 00264183 2/27/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.26
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 43.83
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 V ERIZON 37.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 V ERIZON 152.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 176.75
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 536.92
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 545.16
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ]4:53:2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P23
Agenda Check Ret=ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor N_ ame Amount
AP - 00264212 3/S/2008 AIRGAS WEST 387.01
AP - 00264214 3/S/2008 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 313.87
AP - 00264223 3/S/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 777.60
AP - 00264223 3/5/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,458.00
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 264.96
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 265.69
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 210.1 S
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 156.00
AP - 00264244 3/5/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 266.48
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 195.40
AP - 00264244 3/S/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 178.11
AP - 00264247 3/S/2008 CALIFORNIA FIRE PREY INSTITUTE 100.00
AP - 00264252 3/S/2008 CALIFORNIA PUMPING & SANITATION 385.00
AP - 00264259 3/S/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 146.82
AP - 00264259 3/S/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 25.91
AP - 00264260 3/S/2008 CARSON, DANIEL 162.21
AP - 00264266 3/S/2008 COMEAU, CHAD 121.25
AP - 00264266 3/S/2008 COMEAU, CHAD 198.36
AP - 00264274 3/S/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.17
AP - 00264274 3/S/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.34
AP - 00264298 3/S/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00
AP - 00264298 3/S/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 430.98
AP - 00264298 3/S/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 464.94
AP - 00264299 3/S/2008 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 934.00
AP - 00264303 3/5/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 75.34
AP - 00264320 3/5/2008 HOLLOWAY, DAN 195.09
AP - 0026432] 3/S/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 19.07
AP - 00264321 3/S/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2.OS
AP - 00264321 3/S/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8.30
AP - 00264336 3/S/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 645.21
AP - 00264340 3/S/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 283.85
AP - 00264343 3/S/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,700.00
AP - 00264344 3/S/2008 LANDORF, RICHARD 142.86
AP - 00264344 3/S/2008 LANDORF, RICHARD 134.78
AP - 00264346 3/S/2008 LEAL, MICHAEL 198.37
AP - 00264349 3/S/2008 LICHTMAN, OFER 116.1 S
AP - 00264349 3/S/2008 LICHTMAN, OFER 296.29
AP - 00264354 3/S/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 246.53
AP - 00264365 3/S/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264369 3/5/2008 NAVARRETTE, DANIEL J. 126.25
AP - 00264369 3/S/2008 NAVARRETTE, DANIEL J. 167.90
AP - 00264374 3/S/2008 NOREEN, ERIC S. 153.24
AP - 00264377 3/S/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 246.SS
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 62.82
AP - 00264377 3/S/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 337.91
AP - 00264377 3/S/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.73
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 106.46
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY ]49.71
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 106.46
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 128.08
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 192.13
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 64.04
AP - 00264388 3/S/2008 POLISHED IMAGE AND SUPPLY 84.84
AP - 00264390 3/S/2008 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 659.70
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 14:53:2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P24
Agenda Check Ret=.ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264402 3/5/2008 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONEVG INC 24.50
AP - 00264414 3/5/2008 ROEDER, JEFF 140.39
AP - 00264414 3/5/2008 ROEDER, JEFF 286.51
AP - 00264435 3/5/2008 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 553.00
AP - 00264435 3/5/2008 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 267.92
AP - 00264437 3/5/2008 SMART AND FINAL 19.77
AP - 00264437 3/5/2008 SMART AND FINAL 237.30
AP - 00264437 3/5/2008 SMART AND FINAL 19.77
AP - 00264438 3/5/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 308.78
AP - 00264438 3/5/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 113.62
AP - 00264438 3/5/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,020.81
AP - 00264438 3/5/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,020.81
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 419.05
AP - 00264454 3/5/2008 T MOBILE 3227
AP - 00264454 3/5/2008 T MOBILE 32.22
AP - 00264461 3/5/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82
AP - 00264461 3/5/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 790.52
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.16
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 72.00
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 671.95
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 92.90
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 119.85
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 91.54
AP - 00264465 3/5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 156.55
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 38.65
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 33.49
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 61.32
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 75.09
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 45.17
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 59.84
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 135.51
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 105.59
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 90.34
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 75.09
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 116.55
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 70.10
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 92.86
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 210.30
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 163.87
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 140.20
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 116.53
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 49.13
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 29.56
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 39.15
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 88.67
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 69.09
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 59.11
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 49.13
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:53:2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No.
AP - 00264486
AP - 00264489
AP - 00264489
Check Date Vendor Name
3/5/2008 XEROX CORPORATION
3/5/2008 ZBINDEN, JONATHAN
3/5/2008 ZBINDEN, JONATHAN
Amount
147.00
180.79
521.97
P25
Total for Check ID AP: 103,320.80
Total Cor Entit}': 103,320.80
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout
Current Date: 03/12/200
Time: 14:53:2
RANCHp
~UGAtdory~q
~~
FIRE
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book %o} Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equly. 365 Equly.
Local Agency Investment Fund 9,864,908.84 9,864,908.84 9,864,908.84 83.15 1 1 4.104 4.161
Fetleral Agency Issues-Coupon 2,000,000.00 2,010,625.00 1,999,000.00 16.85 731 439 5.081 5.152
11,664,908.84 11,875,533.84 11,863,908.64 100.00% 124 75 4.269 4.328
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking 175,066.61 175,066.61 175,066.61 1 1 0.197 0.200
(not inclutled in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments 12,039,975.45 12,050,600.45 12,038,975.45 124 75 4.269 4.328
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 47,747.78 323,869.45
Average Daily Balance 12,599,634.16 9,720,492.60
Effective Rate of Return 4.77%, 4.98%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department he v grit Pro ram herein shown provides suffcient cash Flow liquidity to meet the neM six months estimated expenditures. The attached State of California
Pool o gtrne t Aq or 1t (LAIF) st ten1~nt is pr Ided under the City and State offcial Investment Policy and represents the monthly source of valuation for the prior month's end.
John Rti8lison'Treasurer
Reporting period 0210112008-0212912008 PoMolio FIRE
CP
Run Date. 0311212006-t6~.16 PM (PRF PM1)6ymRept641.202b ~
Report Ver. 5.00 ~
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investmenl# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment FUnd
SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 9,864,908.84 9,884,908.84 9,864,908.84 4.161 4.104 1
Subtotal antl Average 9,202,839.87 9,864,908.84 9,664,908.84 9,864,908.84 4.104 1
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3133XKT96 1006 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/14/2007 2,000,000.00 2,010,625.00 1,999,000.00 5.125 5.081 439 05/14/2009
Subtotal and Average 3,240,131.03 2,000,000.00 2,010,625.00 1,999,000.00 5.081 439
Total and Average 12,599,634.16
Run Hate: 03112/2006 -16:16
11,864,908.84 11,875,533.84 11,863,908.84
4.269 75
PoMolio FIRE
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) Symaepl 6 41.202E N
V
Report Ver. 5.00
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
February 29, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's J60 Maturity
Passbook/Checking Accounts
SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 175,066.61 175,066.61 175,066.61 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 ~ 1
Total Cash and Investments 12,599,634.16
72,079,975.45 72,050,600.45 12,078,975.45
4.269 75
Run Dale: 03/1212006 - 1 6:16
Portfolio FIRE
CP
PM (PRF_PM2)SymRepi6A1.202b N
W
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Stated Transac0on Purchases Retlemptlons Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withtlrawals Balance
Page 4
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
SY50001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 4.161 3,000,000.00 600,000.00
Subtotal 7,46d,908.84 3,000,000.00 600,000.00 9,864,908.84
PassbooklChecking Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 19,060.62 0.00
Subtotal 156,005.99 19,060.62 0.00 175,066.61
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3128X5C30 1005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 5.300 07/13/2008 0.00 2,999,400.00
Suhtotal 4,998,400.00 0.00 2,999,400.00 1,999,000.00
Total 12,619,314.83 3,019,060.62 3,599,400.00 12,038,975.45
Run Date: 03/1212000 - 16:16
Podfolio FIRE
C ~
PM (PRF PM3) SymRept 641.20: ~
Report Var. 5.00
P30
Pooled State of California
Money Investment Account
Market Valuation
1/31 /2008
Description Carrying. Cost Plus
Accrued Interest Purch:
Fair Value
Accrued.lnterest
United States Treasury:
Bills $ 589,614,388.88 $ 599,274,000.00 NA
Notes $ 2,218,108,619.46 $ 2,223,024,000.00 $ 15,936,806.00
Federal Agency:
SBA $ 573,559,314.71 $ 562,279,087.44 $ 4,855,734.93
MBS $ 1,191,532,139.26 $ 1,211,787,878.50 $ 5,652,490.51
Bonds $ 5,507,594,930.68 $ 5,564,541,414.65 $ 107,803,022.97
Floaters $ 3,228,903,265.24 $ 3,227,380,850.00 $ 21,808,033.28
Discount Notes $ 12,545,820,097.40 $ 12,737,272,500.00 NA
FHLMC PC $ 201,703.82 $ 208,829.39 $ 3,304.58
GNMA $ 178,392.49 $ 207,909.97 $ 1,769.67
CDs-Floaters $ 200,000,000.00 $ 200,000,000.00 $ 2,556,194.44
Bank Notes $ 1,925,000,000.00 $ 1,926,256,029.50 $ 12,425,222.22
CDs $ 12,985,063,540.04 $ 13,006,496,466.35 $ 80,183,784.77
Commercial Paper $ 6,390,533,937.46 $ 6,449,696,957.79 NA
Corporate:
Floaters $ 119,015,372.40 $ 114,973,330.00 $ 881,256.61
Bonds $ 231,139,589.10 $ 233,516,737.25 $ 3,142,613.47
Repurchase Agreements $ - NA
Reverse Repurchase $ - $ - $ -
Time Deposits $ 9,151,295,000.00 $ 9,151,295,000.00 NA
AB 55 8 GF Loans $ 8,896,960,949.83 $ 8,896,960,949.83 NA
TOTAL $ 65,754,521,240.77 $ 66,105,171,940.67 $ 255,250,233.45
Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 66,360,422,174.12
Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and
Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost).
STAFF REPORT
RANCHO CUCAb1ONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief
By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II
Subject: ADOPTION OF ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP NO 88-08-8-1
P31
RANCHO
C,,UCAMONGA
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of a resolution adopting a boundary map showing property (located at 9991
Snowdrop Rd.) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1.
BACKGROUND
Douglas & Linda Andresen (APN: 0201-043-45) is conditioned to annex into Community
Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the
referenced parcel into CFD No. 88-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation boundary map
is presented for Board consideration and approval. The boundary map (Exhibit "A")
illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire
project.
Respe tfully submitted,
Peter M. Bryan
Fire Chief
EXHIBIT 'A' Ps2
ANNEXATION MAP NO. 88-08-I OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-F
OF THE RANCHO GUGAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RaNCHO Cif ~IMON^~ PRl!' PROTB.^^ON Di_~TM't' C&R77FIC
NOTE: Ffledm dr O(fic¢ of thrSwxury otds Rawho de®ooyFve P'otectiao
THIS ANNEXATION MAP SHALL 60VERN FOR Dbtria. Gl~ l thit_dey 300
ALL DETAILS AS TO THE EXTENT OF THE
TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE ABOVE
REFERENCED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. SHCRSfAHy
ItANQiO CUC~ fON!'iA F[RH P1tO7EC170N DS1RE.T
STATH OF CAL ~ORNfA
m ~ at Haok of Map of Aeeenmme and
Comoamib PwlUdu D~ehicb, w Pace . in the OC9ee of the Cowry
I henhy uitity do iWtluo map showing booedrtia diaritafy propowd to
be moucd to ryFw:7icu DigriaNo.BB-t of~eHmeho Cor~anp
Fin Itoewtim mial,'~, Caary of 9m Hemmdim, Sbte of Califoni4 wu
spproved h5' the of Dircaeon of weh fin pros«tlm diprla et r, n[{uly
mutlog those(, hold do tlw _ dq of . 200 hY ib
Remlutlm No. .71tie AOncetim Map m>code the howdvY nup for
Commwiry P gtla ui.ma No. g8.1 of the ltaocho Cnmwnga Fve
Aobctlw lr Coupry of Sm Banurdioo, Sbb of Catifotni0. prwr headed
SfA7H OP
'Z 1~2~8 47.53' .
pEi~~'' MPp R=230
p PRGE~. 0=15'32
L=62.4
APN: 0201-043-45-0000
1.99 ACRES 611.41''
22 s.6o'
R=170.00' 619~~21/
~=31'49'34" p.M' ~ R=170.00'
\ L-94.43' 4=91'50 41
~ \ L=272.51'
~~.~ -
o.
'Nb map hea bm elef d
_dq of I
Auemmul md.
of
Lvry wallow
Auditadcootro- -tteaoi
Cowry of9m '
STATH OF ORM
BY•
DocummtNumha u,;,
7d0~ at _ .m, m Book _ of Mope of
~w1I111fJ DIMal IL WBe _.~lt the tegoert
SHEET I OF I
P33
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08- DO9
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING
AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING
PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex
territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
"Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of
the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing
Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
88-1 (the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Boundary Map No. 88-08-1 to
Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of
San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Boundary Map") showing the territory proposed to be
annexed to the District (the "Territory").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The Boundary Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the
District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved
and adopted.
SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy
of Boundary Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution,
and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the
time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the
annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the
correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in
the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
P34
Resolution No. FD
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of
said Board held on the _ day of 2008.
Executed this _ day of 2008 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
STAFF REPORT '~ -
RANQ-10 CUGAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
Date: March 19, 2008 C',UCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief
By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II
Subject: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No.
88-08-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, to specify facilities and services to be
financed, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the territory proposed to be
annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation.
BACKGROUND
Douglas & Linda Andresen (APN: 0201-043-45) is conditioned by the City and Fire District
to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 to satisfy fire
protection service mitigation impacts. In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings,
the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving a boundary map of the
territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex.
The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex; (b) the
facilities and services which the annexed property will, in part, finance (Exhibit "A" of said
Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the annexed property; (d) the rate and
method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution); (e)
the date, time and location of the public hearing set for April 16, 2008; and (f) election
requirements.
P35
Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the
annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolution is considered to be
P36
RESOUTIONOF INTENTTONTO ANNEX PacE 2
NIARQ-I 19, 2008
routine and non-controversial, as the property owner is in support of the annexation
procedure. On April 16, 2008, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on
this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Peter M. Bryan
Fire Chief
Attachment
P37
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08- ODD
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.88-1,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors'), formed a Community Facilities District
pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982",
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of
California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain
real property to the District (the "Territory"); and
WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-08-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California"
(the "Boundary Map")showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been
submitted, which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on
file with the transcript of these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex
the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory
proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the services to be financed from the proceeds of
the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would
be levied within the Territory to finance such services, and to set a time and place for a
public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby
resolve as follows:
RECITALS
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors
pursuant to the authorization of the Act.
INTENTION TO ANNEX: DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT
SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and
necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of
Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District.
A description of the Territory is as follows:
P38
Resolution No. O8-
Page -2-
All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed
to the District, as such property is shown on the Boundary
Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of
which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain
open for public inspection.
A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter
described as follows:
All that property and territory as originally included within the
District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such
properties were shown on maps of the original District and
the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as
approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the
name of the original District. Copies of such maps are on f le
in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the
Office of the County Recorder.
SERVICES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT
SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the
proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Services") are
generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs
and expenses necessary to provide the Services.
The Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of
special taxes levied within District are the types of services to be provided in
the Territory. If and to the extent possible the Services shall be provided in
common within the District and the Territory.
P39
Resolution No. 08-
Page -3-
SPECIAL TAXES
SECTION 5: It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where
funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services
and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by
recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the
Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For
further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the
proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax
Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein bythis reference
and which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment of such
special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory
to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay.
The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to
the special tax levied to pay for the Services in the District, except that a
higher or lower special tax maybe levied within the Territory to the extent that
the actual cost of providing the Services in the Territory is higher or lower
than the cost of providing those Services in the original District.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate
which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied
pursuant to the Special Tax Formula.
The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner
as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties,
procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for
ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by
resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as
necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax
roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of
the District.
Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien
to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real
property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until
the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien
canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative
body ceases.
The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall
not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District.
P40
Resolution No. 08-
Page -4-
PUBLIC HEARING
SECTION 6: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 16th DAY OF APRIL 2008, AT THE
HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF
THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC
HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL
CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND
APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE
TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION.
AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED
PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY
OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL
BE HEARD.
AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED
ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
W ITHIN THE TERRITORY OR ANY OTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN
THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED
PERSON. ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR
SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND
SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO
WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE
FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE
PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT
ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
P41
Resolution No. 08-
Page -5-
MAJORITY PROTEST
SECTION 7: If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters,
whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the
registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing
within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the
territory included in the District, or (d)owners of one-half or more of the area
of land in the territory included in the Territory, file written protests against the
proposed annexation of the Territoryto the District and such protests are not
withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further
proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one yearfrom the date of the
decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public
hearing.
ELECTION
SECTION 8: Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, if the legislative body determines
to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the
qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters
within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the
vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre
or portion thereof within the Territory.
NOTICE
SECTION 9: Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the
Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general
circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government
Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to
the date set for the public hearing.
A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as required by the Act.
P42
Resolution No. 08-
Page -6-
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President
ATTEST:
Debra H. Adams, Secretary
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular
meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2008.
Executed this day of 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
P43
Resolution No. 08-
Page -7-
EXHIBIT 'A'
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES
The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to
provide fire protection and suppression services.
P44
Resolution No. 08-
Page -8-
EXHIBIT 'B'
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
FISCAL YEAR 2007/08
TAXING CLASSIFICATION SPECIAL TAX LEVY
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class I $433.19
(more than 3590 SF)
B. Residential Class II $333.87
(3077 to 3589 SF)
C. Residential Class III $265.66
(2564 to 3076 SF)
D. Residential Class IV $232.16
(2308 to 2563 SF)
E. Residential Class V $201.03
(2051 to 2307 SF)
F. Residential Class VI $183.10
(1795 to 2050 SF)
G. Residential Class VII $165.13
(less than 1795 SF)
Co mmercial/Industrial Property $666.54 per acre or $0.059
per square foot or building
area, whichever is greater.
2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or
parcel
3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre
SF =Square Feet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00263925 2/27/2008 91 EXPRESS LANES 115.00
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 30.81
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 646.90
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 60.32
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 56.49
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE -32.31
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.54
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.59
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.54
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 311.02
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 377.26
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 203.06
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,373.69
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.69
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 21.39
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.54
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 401.66
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.54
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 427.79
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.09
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 872.70
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 44.18
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 375.80
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.78
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 56.49
AP - 00263926 2/27/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 206.79
AP - 00263927 2/27/2008 A&V SOFTBALL 2,254.00
AP - 00263928 2/27/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 59.83
AP - 00263929 2/27/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 40.41
AP - 00263929 2/27/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 22.51
AP - 00263929 2/27/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 80.82
AP - 00263930 2/27/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 79.53
AP - 00263930 2/27/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 90.77
AP - 00263931 2/27/2008 ACCELA INC 9,527.50
AP - 00263932 2/27/2008 ACCURATE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 111.87
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00263933 2/27/2008 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00263934 2/27/2008 AFLAC 4,287.08
AP - 00263934 2/27/2008 AFLAC 3,978.74
AP - 00263936 2/27/2008 AGUIRRE, PARIS 280.00
AP - 00263937 2/27/2008 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE INC. 38.45
AP - 00263939 2/27/2008 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 16,308.10
AP - 00263940 2/27/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 331.87
AP - 00263941 2/27/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 38.55
AP - 00263942 2/27/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00
AP - 00263943 2/27/2008 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 166.25
AP - 00263944 2/27/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 51.95
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00263944 2/27/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 84.50
AP - 00263944 2/27/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 93.28
AP - 00263945 2/27/2008 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 2,256.97
AP - 00263947 2/27/2008 AQUINO, JOHN P. 160.36
AP - 00263948 2/27/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00263948 2/27/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00263950 2/27/2008 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 718.33
AP - 00263952 2/27/2008 AVANTS, MARGE 75.00
AP - 00263952 2/27/2008 AVANTS, MARGE 120.00
AP - 00263953 2/27/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 88.00
AP - 00263953 2/27/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 47.41
AP - 00263953 2/27/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 285.96
AP - 00263954 2/27/2008 BALDEON, CARLOS 299.25
AP - 00263956 2/27/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 498.61
AP - 00263956 2/27/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE -43.02
AP - 00263956 2/27/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 203.96
AP - 00263957 2/27/2008 BAST, CHRISTINE 110.00
AP - 00263958 2/27/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 317.50
AP - 00263959 2/27/2008 BERNARD, JEREMY 225.00
AP - 00263959 2/27/2008 BERNARD, JEREMY 1,147.38
AP - 00263960 2/27/2008 BHIBEKSHAN, SAROJ 60.00
AP - 00263961 2/27/2008 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 139,647.98
AP - 00263962 2/27/2008 BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 70,159.77
AP - 00263962 2/27/2008 BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC. -7,015.98
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 44.88
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 34.42
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.85
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 426
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 354.56
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 183.60
AP - 00263963 2/27/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00263964 2/27/2008 BROWNLEE, MARK 550.00
AP - 00263965 2/27/2008 BRUCE, INGRID 91.56
AP - 00263966 2/27/2008 BUCKNAM AND ASSOCIATES 726.50
AP - 00263967 2/27/2008 BURGESS, JULIA 28.00
AP - 00263968 2/27/2008 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 220.56
AP - 00263969 2/27/2008 BUSHONG, BRIDGET 440.00
AP - 00263970 2/27/2008 BUSINESS OBJECTS AMERICA 4,400.00
AP - 00263971 2/27/2008 CALBO 425.00
AP - 00263972 2/27/2008 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 101,195.10
AP - 00263973 2/27/2008 CALIXTQ, REMEDIOS 500.00
AP - 00263974 2/27/2008 CALSENSE 7,394.20
AP - 00263974 2/27/2008 CALSENSE 3,304.69
AP - 00263974 2/27/2008 CALSENSE 1,028.73
AP - 00263975 2/27/2008 CAPSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO INC 5,000.00
AP - 00263976 2/27/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 274.50
AP - 00263976 2/27/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 678.05
AP - 00263976 2/27/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00263977 2/27/2008 CAREER TRACK 129.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00263979 2/27/2008 CENICEROS, LOIS 45.00
AP - 00263980 2/27/2008 CENTRAL DRUGS 124.29
AP - 00263981 2/27/2008 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 32.99
AP - 00263982 2/27/2008 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 529.60
AP - 00263982 2/27/2008 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 588.00
AP - 00263982 2/27/2008 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 1,096.80
AP - 00263983 2/27/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00263984 2/27/2008 CLARK, KAREN 324.00
AP - 00263985 2/27/2008 CLOUD, DON 900.00
AP - 00263985 2/27/2008 CLOUD, DON 280.00
AP - 00263986 2/27/2008 CMRTA 50.00
AP - 00263987 2/27/2008 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANIES 774.92
AP - 00263989 2/27/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 168.09
AP - 00263990 2/27/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS ] 6.39
AP - 00263991 2/27/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 117.60
AP - 00263991 2/27/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 7.00
AP - 00263992 2/27/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 3,519.12
AP - 00263993 2/27/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 568.96
AP - 00263993 2/27/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 133.35
AP - 00263993 2/27/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20
AP - 00263993 2/27/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 240.03
AP - 00263994 2/27/2008 CPOA 80.00
AP - 00263994 2/27/2008 CPOA 80.00
AP - 00263995 2/27/2008 CRAFCO INC 573.23
AP - 00263996 2/27/2008 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00
AP - 00263997 2/27/2008 CROWNE PLAZA RESORT HILTON HEAD 1,017.72
AP - 00263998 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA ESTATES 52 LLC 15,000.00
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,116.27
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 450.44
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 710.49
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.96
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.83
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.75
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.94
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.09
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.88
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.30
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,667.10
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.61
AP - 00264000 2/27!2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 0.43
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.60
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.65
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.67
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 11.00
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.66
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.98
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.32
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.66
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.33
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.31
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 28.36
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.66
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.27
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p48
Asienda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.98
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.80
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.65
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.32
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.31
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,496.86
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.67
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.67
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.69
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.26
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.93
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.10
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.51
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.94
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.96
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 294.54
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 548.57
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 335.77
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 495.37
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.67
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.50
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.20
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.00
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.61
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.28
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.10
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.67
AP - 00264000 2/27/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.51
AP - 00264001 2/27/2008 D & D DISPOSAL INC. 400.00
AP - 00264002 2/27/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 382.52
AP - 00264002 2/27/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 328.64
AP - 00264003 2/27/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,049.41
AP - 00264004 2/27/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 12,170.00
AP - 00264005 2/27/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 3,370.90
AP - 00264006 2/27/2008 DAMES INC, ALBERT W 91,691.89
AP - 00264007 2/27/2008 DAMS, STEVEN 121.20
AP - 00264007 2/27/2008 DAMS, STEVEN 22.03
AP - 00264008 2/27/2008 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 2,780.00
AP - 00264009 2/27/2008 DBAC INC 10,000.00
AP - 00264010 2/27/2008 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 150.00
AP - 0026401 I 2/27/2008 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,625.00
AP - 00264011 2/27/2008 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,504.00
AP - 00264012 2/27/2008 DMJM HARRIS 19,141.39
AP - 00264013 2/27/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 30.15
AP - 00264013 2/27/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 21.43
AP - 00264013 2/27/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 25.06
AP - 002640]4 2/27/2008 DUNN, ANN MARIE 96.00
AP - 00264014 2/27/2008 DUNK, ANN MARIE 42.00
AP - 00264015 2/27/2008 DUROST, BARBARA 550.00
AP - 00264016 2/27/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,670.00
AP - 00264016 2/27/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,440.00
AP - 00264016 2/27/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 3,700.00
AP - 00264016 2/27!2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,585.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 03/12/200
ReporbCK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AEenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264017 2/27/2008 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 1,723.33
AP - 00264018 2/27/2008 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 15,611.00
AP - 00264019 2/27/2008 ESGIL CORPORATION 7,815.00
AP - 00264020 2/27/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 331.36
AP - 00264021 2/27/2008 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 2,352.77
AP - 00264022 2/27/2008 FAIRWAY FORD 81,384.86
AP - 00264023 2/27/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 40.59
AP - 00264023 2/27/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.35
AP - 00264023 2/27/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.45
AP - 00264023 2/27/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.45
AP - 00264023 2/27/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 27.07
AP - 00264024 2/27/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00
AP - 00264024 2/27/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES SS1.20
AP - 00264025 2/27/2008 FINLEY, CAROL 35.00
AP - 00264026 2/27/2008 FLORES, CHRISTOPHER 1,000.00
AP - 00264027 2/27/2008 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER 132.26
AP - 00264028 2/27/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 65.00
AP - 00264028 2/27/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 43.79
AP - 00264028 2/27/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 427.80
AP - 00264028 2/27/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 140.22
AP - 00264029 2/27/2008 FORTEL TRAFFIC INC. 380.00
AP - 00264030 2/27/2008 FOUNTAIN OF LIFE CHURCH 126.00
AP - 00264032 2/27/2008 FREUDE, LARRY 60.00
AP - 00264034 2/27/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 30.13
AP - 00264034 2/27/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 54.87
AP - 00264034 2/27/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 54.08
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 205.00
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHTCS 226.01
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 153.99
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 1,629.24
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 910.00
AP - 00264035 2/27/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 2,324.71
AP - 00264036 2/27/2008 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00
AP - 00264037 2/27/2008 GOOD SAMARITAN ZION CHURCH 239.50
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 93.32
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 4,344.48
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 452.64
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 150.26
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 42.83
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 162.92
AP - 00264038 2/27/2008 GRAINGER 28.38
AP - 00264039 2/27/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 18,968.87
AP - 0026404] 2/27/2008 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 200.00
AP - 00264042 2/27/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 420.85
AP - 00264043 2/27/2008 HERNANDEZ, LUVIA 100.00
AP - 00264044 2/27/2008 HILLCREST CONTRACTING INC. 98,188.00
AP - 00264044 2/27/2008 HILLCREST CONTRACTING INC. -9,818.50
AP - 00264045 2/27/2008 HILTON GARDEN INN 783.20
AP - 00264045 2/27/2008 HILTON GARDEN INN 979.00
AP - 00264046 2/27/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 325.41
AP - 00264046 2/27/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 612.29
AP - 00264046 2/27/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 33.45
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 60.61
P49
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: S Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50
AEenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 8.09
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 113.26
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 177.30
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 43.98
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 15.40
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 1,272.34
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 922.47
AP - 00264049 2/27/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 162.19
AP - 00264050 2/27/2008 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 811.96
AP - 00264052 2/27/2008 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 889.00
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00264054 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00264055 2/27/2008 INLAND VALLEY RV SERVICE & SUPPLIES 703.80
AP - 00264056 2/27/2008 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 378.00
AP - 00264057 2/27/2008 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,390.50
AP - 00264057 2/27/2008 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,336.50
AP - 00264058 2/27/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 115,619.03
AP - 00264058 2/27/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 594.30
AP - 00264058 2/27/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 908.73
AP - 00264059 2/27/2008 KAUFMAN, HOPE 250.00
AP - 00264061 2/27/2008 KONE INC 433.59
AP - 00264062 2/27/2008 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC 490.00
AP - 00264063 2/27/2008 LALONDE, JOHN 1,000.00
AP - 00264064 2/27/2008 LAM, JACK 129.78
AP - 00264064 2/27/2008 LAM, JACK 10.99
AP - 00264065 2/27/2008 LAMOUREAUX, DAVID 300.00
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 48.00
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 48.00
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 216.00
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 329.85
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,539.80
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,108.65
AP - 00264066 2/27/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 48.35
AP - 00264069 2/27/2008 LOS ANGELES METRO PUBLIC PURCHASING A~ 50.00
AP - 00264071 2/27/2008 MANCINELLI, BRUNO 9,533.00
AP - 00264072 2/27/2008 MANSOURI, IRAJ 7,680.00
AP - 00264073 2/27/2008 MARIN, ROBERT 138.00
AP - 00264074 2/27/2008 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 87.81
AP - 00264075 2/27/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00264076 2/27/2008 MCCLINTOCK, RONDALYNNE 75.00
AP - 00264077 2/27/2008 MELOCOTON, TAMAR 100.00
AP - 00264078 2/27/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 158.93
AP -00264078 2/27/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 12.99
AP - 00264078 2/27/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 42.97
AP - 00264078 2/27/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 158.93
AP - 00264079 2/27/2008 MIGLIACCI, THERESA 120.00
AP - 00264080 2/27/2008 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA II 490.00
AP - 00264081 2/27/2008 MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS 304.70
AP - 00264083 2/27/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 12.00
AP - 00264084 2/27/2008 NAFFZIGER, MICHAEL 234.00
AP - 00264085 2/27/2008 NASH, JESSICA 1,147.38
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51
At=_enda Check Ret=ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264085 2/27/2008 NASH, JESSICA 225.00
AP - 00264086 2/27/2008 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 126.00
AP - 00264086 2/27/2008 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 59.00
AP - 00264087 2/27/2008 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATI 115.00
AP - 00264088 2/27/2008 NEXTEL 75.28
AP - 00264089 2/27/2008 NIIQYO & MOORE 4,001.00
AP - 00264090 2/27/2008 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOCIATES 2,985.00
AP - 00264091 2/27/2008 NOWAK, JOHN 600.00
AP - 00264091 2/27/2008 NOWAK, JOHN 109.21
AP - 00264092 2/27/2008 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 55.60
AP - 00264092 2/27/2008 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 101.60
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 62.13
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.81
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 224.39
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 262.51
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 128.20
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.10
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 175.40
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 37.71
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 273.56
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 72.85
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 64.54
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.75
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ] 14.52
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 76.73
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 71.70
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 13.68
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,370.63
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 73.63
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 24.14
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 137.42
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 174.92
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.87
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.73
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.48
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.16
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.69
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.97
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.29
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.56
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 22.25
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.68
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.84
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.60
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 59.25
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 122.90
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 85.66
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 81.74
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 43.54
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 5.92
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 254.24
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 117.30
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 270.52
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 201.02
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 71.08
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.47
AP - 00264094 2/27/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 87.79
AP - 00264095 2/27/2008 OH, SCOTT 939.00
AP - 00264096 2/27/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 347.98
AP - 00264096 2/27/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 4,065.41
AP - 00264097 2/27/2008 ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER ICC 60.00
AP - 00264098 2/27/2008 OTT, LAURA 504.00
AP - 00264098 2/27/2008 OTT, LAURA 108.00
AP - 00264098 2/27/2008 OTT, LAURA 228.00
AP - 00264098 2/27/2008 OTT, LAURA 126.00
AP - 00264099 2/27/2008 OTT, SHARON 156.00
AP - 00264099 2/27/2008 OTT, SHARON 240.00
AP - 00264100 2/27/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 677.66
AP - 00264101 2/27/2008 PAIRMAN, DORIS 100.00
AP - 00264102 2/27/2008 PALLOTTO, KRISTINA 12.13
AP - 00264102 2/27/2008 PALLOTTO, KRISTINA 41.92
AP - 00264103 2/27/2008 PARK, WENDY 145.00
AP - 00264104 2/27/2008 PARTY ON RENTALS 210.00
AP - 00264105 2/27/2008 PERSKE, BRIAN 550.00
AP - 00264106 2/27/2008 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 28.67
AP - 00264108 2/27/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 7,540.44
AP - 00264109 2/27/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80
AP - 002641 ] 0 2/27/2008 PRINCIPAL LIFE 2,072.30
AP - 00264112 2/27/2008 QUIRAP, JOSELITO 500.00
AP - 00264113 2/27/2008 RAMILLA, VICTORIA 500.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 125.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 002641 ]4 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI ]25.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00264114 2/27/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00264115 2/27/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 3,610.49
AP - 00264116 2/27/2008 RCPFA 7,353.02
AP - 00264117 2/27/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 90.00
AP - 00264118 2/27/2008 RED RIDGE SOFTWARE COMPANY 299.00
AP - 00264119 2/27/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 155.65
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53
Aeenda Check Ret=_ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264120 2/27/2008 REDDELL, SONYA 5,000.00
AP - 00264120 2/27/2008 REDDELL, SONYA 250.00
AP - 00264121 2/27/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 89.11
AP - 00264121 2/27/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 55.38
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 44,435.68
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 31.60
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 33.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,052.50
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 88.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,011.20
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 18.50
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 29,176.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 37.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,954.76
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 462.00
AP - 00264122 2/27/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,332.00
AP - 00264123 2/27/2008 ROCK HAVEN LLC 15,000.00
AP - 00264124 2/27/2008 ROSEN PUBLISHING AND POWERKIDS 993.35
AP - 00264126 2/27/2008 RUBIO, RONDA 900.00
AP - 00264 ] 27 2/27/2008 RUSCO INC 1,023.63
AP - 00264128 2/27/2008 SABBAGH, MICHELE 38.00
AP - 00264129 2/27/2008 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 181.09
AP - 00264130 2/27/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 445.52
AP - 00264130 2/27/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 622.67
AP - 00264132 2/27/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORT 242.19
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 11,021.28
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 2,925.41
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 10,389.16
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 14,346.95
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 21,708.26
AP - 00264134 2/27/2008 SC FUELS 15,219.87
AP - 00264135 2/27/2008 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 192.00
AP - 00264136 2/27/2008 SELEZINKA, ROMAN 550.00
AP - 00264137 2/27/2008 SELEZINKA, VICTORIA 550.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 162.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 45.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL. CALVIN 6.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 34.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 144.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 126.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 100.80
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 100.80
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 102.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 18.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 135.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 54.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 105.00
AP - 00264138 2/27/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 35.00
AP - 00264140 2/27/2008 SHAC 100.00
AP - 00264140 2/27/2008 SHAC 185.00
AP - 00264141 2/27/2008 SHARP, LAMES C 440.00
AP - 00264142 2/27/2008 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES 423.95
AP - 00264143 2/27/2008 SHRED IT 21.25
AP - 00264143 2/27/2008 SHRED IT 21.25
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Re>?ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264143 2/27/2008 SHRED IT 4250
AP - 00264144 2/27/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,850.00
AP - 00264144 2/27/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,007.36
AP - 00264144 2/27/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,907.88
AP - 00264145 2/27/2008 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATORIES INC 3,324.09
AP - 00264146 2/27/2008 SKINNER, GARY AND PATRICIA 1,361.50
AP - 00264146 2/27/2008 SKINNER, GARY AND PATRICIA 1,224.93
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 115.16
AP - 00264147 2/27/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,777.92
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.94
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.08
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.57
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.58
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.31
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.64
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.23
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.48
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.28
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.35
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.08
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.09
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.65
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.33
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.98
AP - 00264]56 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.07
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFOIL\'IA EDISON 14.85
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.77
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.08
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.20
P54
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.58
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.32
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.64
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.96
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.20
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.15
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.16
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.98
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.32
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.27
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.48
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.60
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.23
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.41
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 20.18
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.46
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.82
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.88
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264li6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.47
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.18
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.73
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.70
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.33
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.41
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.75
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.87
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.61
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.98
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.89
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 373.65
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I 1 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 393.94
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.47
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.44
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.43
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.69
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.32
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.80
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.89
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.75
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.46
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 5.47
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.37
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.11
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.44
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.]4
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,052.46
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.88
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.91
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 685.33
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.40
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.34
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 163.27
AP - 00264 ] S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.11
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.61
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.66
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.64
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00264 t S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.20
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Rei?ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.00
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 745.53
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.88
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.44
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.06
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 463.71
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.60
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.83
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.66
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264 ] 56 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.58
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.23
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 636.66
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.22
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.47
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.92
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ]4.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.30
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.91
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.55
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.82
AP - 00264156 2/27!2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.42
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.41
AP - 002641 S6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.80
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.42
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.67
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.72
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.71
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.43
P57
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58
Azrenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.83
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.32
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 254.34
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 254.50
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.54
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.89
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 407.64
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.16
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.66
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 223.87
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.57
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 191.94
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.20
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.05
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.13
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.81
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.94
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.12
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.06
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 126.58
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264li6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.01
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.70
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.15
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264li6 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.35
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORA~IA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.95
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.91
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.30
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.62
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.18
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.70
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porn-ait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 tluough 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.76
AP - 00264156 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 222.06
AP - 00264157 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.73
AP - 00264158 2/27/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.19
AP - 00264159 2/27/2008 SPOONFACTORY 540.00
AP - 00264159 2/27/2008 SPOONFACTORY 330.00
AP - 00264160 2/27/2008 STERICYCLE INC 446.18
AP - 00264160 2/27/2008 STERICYCLE INC 240.57
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 154.65
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 139.15
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 178.08
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 360.90
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 51.30
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 86.25
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 347.40
AP - 00264161 2/27/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 178.96
AP - 00264162 2/27/2008 STEVENSON INC 69.95
AP - 00264163 2/27/2008 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 492.57
AP - 00264165 2/27/2008 TENEYCK, MICHAEL 393.61
AP - 00264166 2/27/2008 TESSIER, JEAN YVES 500.00
AP - 00264167 2/27/2008 TESSIER, JEAN YVES 500.00
AP - 00264168 2/27/2008 THEWES, KRISTEVE 409.50
AP - 00264168 2/27/2008 THEWES, KRISTINE 331.50
AP - 00264170 2/27/2008 TORRES, EILEEN 250.00
AP - 00264172 2/27/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 260.75
AP - 00264172 2/27/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,998.49
AP - 00264173 2/27/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 48,660.38
AP - 00264174 2/27/2008 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 895.35
AP - 00264175 2/27/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 183.50
AP - 00264175 2/27/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 132.71
AP - 00264175 2/27/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.78
AP - 00264175 2/27/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OP CA INC 183.49
AP - 00264176 2/27/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00
AP - 00264177 2/27/2008 UPS 23.40
AP - 00264177 2/27/2008 UPS 27.12
AP - 00264179 2/27/2008 VARIAN, BROOKE 11.00
AP - 00264180 2/27/2008 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 168.00
AP - 00264180 2/27/2008 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 216.00
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 842.35
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 292.85
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 48.74
AP-00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITAWIRELESS 73.21
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 598.04
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 134.29
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 623.49
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 140.00
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 50.82
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 305.32
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 76.33
AP - 00264181 2/27/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 878.20
AP - 00264182 2/27/2008 VEND U COMPANY 92.86
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 92.01
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 35.22
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 33.59
P59
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: IS Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60
Agenda Check Re>?ister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 32.88
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 93.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 20.10
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 37.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 93.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 1825
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 93.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 32.55
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 32.55
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 604.14
AP - 00264185 2!27/2008 VERIZON 50.43
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 75.62
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 86.84
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 653.22
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 70.20
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 161.84
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 5.10
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 8857
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 93.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 88.82
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 31.63
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 32.88
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 108.88
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 37.67
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 46.49
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 53.20
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 60.55
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 114.23
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 82.61
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 471.48
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 128.10
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 38.71
AP - 00264185 2/27/2008 VERIZON 570.79
AP - 00264186 2/27/2008 VICK, LINDA 425.00
AP - 00264187 2/27/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 3,298.27
AP - 00264188 2/27/2008 VICTORIA ARBORS LLC 5,250.00
AP - 00264189 2/27/2008 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 327.63
AP - 00264190 2/27/2008 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 890.90
AP - 00264190 2/27/2008 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 257.27
AP - 00264191 2/27/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 62.58
AP - 00264191 2/27/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 146.58
AP - 00264191 2/27/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 53.37
AP - 00264191 2/27/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 845.32
AP - 00264191 2/27/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 298.01
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 1,631.16
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 635.16
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 413.62
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 628.04
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 941.46
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61
Aeenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 862.02
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 658.32
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 628.68
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 444.60
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 77.22
AP - 00264192 2/27/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 436.64
AP - 00264193 2/27/2008 WATERS, JIM 94.43
AP - 00264194 2/27/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 588.89
AP - 00264194 2/27/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 91.78
AP - 00264195 2/27/2008 WEBB, JASON 500.00
AP - 00264196 2/27/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 44.53
AP - 00264197 2/27/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 95.08
AP - 00264198 2/27/2008 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 28,200.00
AP - 00264199 2/27/2008 WITHER, MATTHEW 550.00
AP - 00264201 2/27/2008 YNS ENTERPRISE NO 2 LLC 35,000.00
AP - 00264202 2/27/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 111.54
AP - 00264203 2/27/2008 ZIRGES, ARLENE 252.00
AP - 00264204 2/27/2008 JONES, ROBERT 3,318.00
AP - 00264205 3/4/2008 US POSTMASTER 175.00
AP - 00264206 3/4/2008 US POSTMASTER 25,000.00
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,570.91
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,090.59
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 440.44
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 103.63
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.78
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 555.70
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 716.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.04
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,296.64
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.78
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 59.95
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 445.95
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.14
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.23
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 28.85
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 36.05
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.19
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.19
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.27
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.19
AP - 00264207 3/5/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 595.74
AP - 00264208 3/5/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 2,313.17
AP - 00264208 3/5/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 12.20
AP - 00264208 3/5/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC -12.20
AP - 00264208 3/5/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 45.48
AP - 00264209 3/5/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 106.38
AP - 00264209 3/5/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 30.13
AP - 00264209 3/5/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 743.24
AP - 00264209 3/5/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 502.16
AP - 00264209 3/5/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 89.72
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62
At=enda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264210 3/5/2008 ADEMORIJIMI, YINKA 500.00
AP - 00264211 3/5/2008 AGUILAR, PETE 740.00
AP - 00264213 3/5/2008 ALL WELDING 380.00
AP - 00264215 3/5/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 50.05
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264216 3/5/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00264217 3/5/2008 AMERI NATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 180.00
AP - 00264218 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 120.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 25.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 25.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 245.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264219 3/5/2008 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 175.00
AP - 00264220 3/5/2008 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 340.00
AP - 00264221 3/5/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 5.40
AP - 00264222 3/5/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP MENT AND SERVICES (A( 28.25
AP - 00264224 3/5/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00264224 3/5/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00264225 3/5/2008 ARBON, DONIELLE 176.00
AP - 00264226 3/5/2008 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 6,658.95
AP - 00264227 3/5/2008 ASSE 635.00
AP - 00264228 3/5/2008 ASSOCIATED GROUP 2,207.59
AP - 00264229 3h/2008 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1,337.08
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264229 3/8/2008 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 4.32
AP - 00264230 3/8/2008 AT&T 3,100.26
AP - 00264230 3/5/2008 AT&T 1,332.68
AP - 00264230 3/8/2008 AT&T 100.58
AP - 00264230 3/8/2008 AT&T 100.58
AP - 00264231 3/8/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS 3,108.23
AP - 00264232 3/8/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,874.85
AP - 00264232 3/8/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 393.54
AP - 00264232 3/8/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,435.79
AP - 00264233 3/8/2008 BARKSHIRE LASER LEVELING INC. 1,100.00
AP - 00264234 3/8/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 181.02
AP - 00264235 3/8/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 812.50
AP - 00264235 3/8/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 197.50
AP - 00264236 3/8/2008 BERMUDEZ, ELIZABETH 121.00
AP - 00264237 3/8/2008 BOHRER DVM, SUSAN 5,294.00
AP - 00264237 3/8/2008 BOHRER DVM, SUSAN 3,336.00
AP - 00264238 3/8/2008 BOY SCOUTS TROOP 699 100.00
AP - 00264239 3/8/2008 BRENT BINNALL 1,499.17
AP - 00264239 3/8/2008 BRENT BINNALL 2,138.97
AP - 00264240 3/8/2008 BRYANT, LAWANDA 100.00
AP - 00264241 3/8/2008 BURGAN, JEREMY 400.00
AP - 00264242 3/8/2008 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 517.05
AP - 00264243 3/8/2008 CACIOLA, JAMES 100.00
AP - 00264245 3/8/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 318.57
AP - 00264246 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 5,330.00
AP - 00264248 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 372.03
AP - 00264249 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00
AP - 00264250 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 47.58
AP - 00264251 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 45.54
AP - 0026425] 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 10.08
AP - 00264253 3/8/2008 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 165.00
AP - 00264254 3/8/2008 CALPELRA 310.00
AP - 00264255 3/8/2008 CALSENSE 5,126.24
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CALSENSE 9,838.42
AP - 00264255 3/5/2008 CALSENSE 17,926.47
AP - 00264255 3/8/2008 CALSENSE 1,104.41
AP - 00264285 3/8/2008 CALSENSE 3,304.69
AP - 00264256 3/8/2008 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 37.02
AP - 00264256 3/8/2008 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 29.78
AP - 00264257 3/8/2008 CAMPOS, ROSINA 200.00
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 518.23
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 499.39
AP - 00264258 3/8/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00264261 3/8/2008 CCPOA 30.00
AP - 00264262 3/8/2008 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 7,098.00
AP - 00264263 3/8/2008 CITY RENTALS 167.54
AP - 00264264 3/5/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 23,570.76
AP - 00264264 3/8/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 4,811.84
AP - 00264264 3/8/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,550.40
AP - 00264265 3/8/2008 CMTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 305.00
AP - 00264265 3/8/2008 CMTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 305.00
AP - 00264267 3/8/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 192.55
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ]9 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64
Aeenda Check Reeister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00264268 3/5/2008 COPE, LINDA 514.00
AP - 00264269 3/5/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 1,308.84
AP - 00264270 3/5/2008 COPRICH, JAZZMINE 30.00
AP - 00264271 3/5/2008 COSYLION, JASON 200.00
AP - 00264272 3/5/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.97
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.88
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.60
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 256.87
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.57
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.96
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.97
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.67
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.29
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.01
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.51
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.66
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 289.22
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 837.18
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.17
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.50
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.84
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.49
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.97
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.64
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.98
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.23
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.67
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.53
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.60
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.94
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 369.02
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.19
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 168.01
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.99
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.61
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.98
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.13
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 353.06
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.81
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.63
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.14
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41.66
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.64
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.39
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.65
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.34
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.33
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.96
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]43.22
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.33
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.62
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.97
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.68
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.60
AP - 00264274 3/5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.00
AP - 00264275 3/5/2008 D 3 EQUIPMENT 4,460.85
AP - 00264275 3/5/2008 D 3 EQUIPMENT 2,715.30
AP - 00264276 3/5/2008 D 7 CONSULTING INC 4,600.00
AP - 00264277 3/5/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 561.92
AP - 00264277 3/5/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 697.15
AP - 00264278 3/5/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 77,520.00
AP - 00264279 3/5/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,180.95
AP - 00264280 3/5/2008 DAMES, RUSSELL D 1,000.00
AP - 00264281 3/5/2008 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 4,060.00
AP - 00264282 3/5/2008 DOCKMASTERS 330.00
AP - 00264283 3/5/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 308.22
AP - 00264283 3/5/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 247.64
AP - 00264284 3/5/2008 E.D.D. RIVERSIDE AREA COLLECTION OFFICE 36.99
AP - 00264285 3/S/2008 EDFUND 65.08
AP - 00264286 3/5/2008 EDWARDS, DUSTIN 120.00
AP - 00264287 3/5/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 110.00
AP - 00264287 3/5/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 75.00
AP - 00264287 3/S/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00
AP - 00264287 3/5/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 50.00
AP - 00264287 3/5/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 330.00
AP - 00264287 3/5/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 50.00
AP - 00264288 3/5/2008 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,100.00
AP - 00264289 3/5/2008 ESPINOZA, LORENA 2,094.00
AP - 00264290 3/5/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 207.74
AP - 00264290 3/S/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 208.08
AP - 00264290 3/S/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 51.04
AP - 00264290 3/5/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 94.30
AP - 00264291 3/5/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 19.40
AP - 00264291 3/5/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 77.59
AP - 00264291 3/5/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 19.40
AP - 00264292 3/5/2008 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 852.17
AP - 00264293 3/5/2008 FAIRPOINT LLC 500.00
AP - 00264294 3/5/2008 FALCON, CHRISTINA 100.00
AP - 00264296 3/5/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 36.60
AP - 00264296 3/5/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 107.13
AP - 00264296 3/5/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 22.32
AP - 00264296 3/5/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.32
AP - 00264297 3/5/2008 FELICIANO. ANTHONY 120.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 534.75
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 558.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 384.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 660.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 552.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 768.00
AP - 00264298 3/5/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 851.20
AP - 00264300 3/5/2008 FLORES, CAROLINA 250.00
AP - 00264301 3/5/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP - 00264302 3/5/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 853.44
P65
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/I 1/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor_Name Amount
AP - 00264302 3/5/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 99.52
AP - 00264304 3/5/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 30.13
AP - 00264304 3/5/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 29.27
AP - 00264305 3/5/2008 GE MONEY BANK/AMAZON 11.00
AP - 00264306 3/5/2008 GIBBYS FENCING MATERIALS 342.45
AP - 00264307 3/5/2008 GILKEY, KATHLEEN 265.00
AP - 00264308 3/5/2008 GLOBAL PRESENTER 3,123.67
AP - 00264309 3/5/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 340.05
AP - 00264309 3/5/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 369.45
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 150.80
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 41.76
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 713.47
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 932.04
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 534.44
AP - 002643 ] 0 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 164.64
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 29.61
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 413.10
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 74.09
AP - 00264310 3/5/2008 GRAINGER 829.32
AP - 00264311 3/5/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 68.27
AP - 00264311 3/5/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 66.94
AP - 00264311 3/5/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 141.84
AP - 00264311 3/5/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 242.24
AP - 00264312 3/5/2008 GUNBY ROOFING, VIC 500.00
AP - 00264313 3/5/2008 HALL & FOREMAN INC 4,000.00
AP - 00264313 3/5/2008 HALL & FOREMAN INC 5,600.00
AP - 00264314 3/5/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 595.10
AP - 00264315 3/5/2008 HEARTSAVERS LLC 50.00
AP - 00264315 3/5/2008 HEARTSAVERS LLC 100.00
AP - 00264315 3/5/2008 HEARTSAVERS LLC 100.00
AP - 00264315 3/5/2008 HEARTSAVERS LLC 110.00
AP - 00264316 3/5/2008 HERNANDEZ, HENRY J 500.00
AP - 00264317 3/5/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 121.22
AP - 00264317 3/5/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 20.47
AP - 00264317 3/5/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 290.51
AP - 00264318 3/5/2008 HIRSCH AND ASSOCIATES 1,026.21
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 287.42
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 123.37
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 135.00
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,217.31
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,217.31
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,979.91
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00264319 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,22459
AP - 002643 ] 9 3/5/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,428.97
AP - 00264321 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 43.02
AP - 00264321 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES ]75.60
AP - 00264321 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 145.47
AP - 0026432] 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 119.47
AP - 00264321 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 40.86
AP - 00264321 3/5/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 17.83
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264321 3/8/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 71.93
AP - 00264322 3/8/2008 HOSE MAN INC 80.25
AP - 00264323 3/5/2008 HOUSE OF RUTH 843.51
AP - 00264324 3/5/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 73.75
AP - 00264324 3/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 223.92
AP - 00264324 3/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 264.41
AP - 00264324 3/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 264.54
AP - 00264325 3/8/2008 HUEY, KELLI 71.50
AP - 00264326 3/8/2008 HUMES, BREANNA 100.00
AP - 00264327 3/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 11.80
AP - 00264327 3/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 207.79
AP - 00264327 3/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 11.80
AP - 00264328 3/8/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 193.37
AP - 00264329 3/5/2008 INDEPENDENT CONCERT PRODUCTIONS 11,600.00
AP - 00264329 3/5/2008 INDEPENDENT CONCERT PRODUCTIONS -460.95
AP - 00264330 3/5/2008 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 48.62
AP - 00264330 3/8/2008 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 255.15
AP - 00264331 3/5/2008 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIC 384.80
AP - 00264332 3/8/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 839.25
AP - 00264332 3/8/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,195.37
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 103.42
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES ] 15.61
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 75.00
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 73.77
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 49.59
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 45.77
AP - 00264333 3/8/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 81.81
AP - 00264333 3/5/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 53.98
AP - 00264334 3/5/2008 INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 1,750.00
AP - 00264335 3/5/2008 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 1,815.17
AP - 00264337 3/5/2008 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 177.79
AP - 00264338 3/8/2008 J D C INC 198,731.72
AP - 00264339 3/5/2008 K K WOODWORKING 20.48
AP-00264339 3/8/2008 KKWOODWORKING 159.43
AP - 00264341 3/5/2008 KURTH, DONALD 500.00
AP - 00264342 3/5/2008 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 4,819.13
AP - 00264342 3/5/2008 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 270.00
AP - 00264342 3/5/2008 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 6,905.00
AP - 00264343 3/8/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 3,700.00
AP - 00264343 3/8/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,350.00
AP - 00264345 3/8/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/5/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/8/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/5/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/5/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/5/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/8/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264345 3/8/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00264348 3/8/2008 LEWIS AND LEWIS 2,862.85
AP - 00264350 3/8/2008 LINA 17,086.22
AP - 00264351 3/8/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 450.00
AP - 00264351 3/8/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 156.25
AP - 00264351 3/8/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 156.25
AP - 00264351 3/5/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 156.25
P67
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AEenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264351 3/5/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 156.25
AP - 00264351 3/5/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 325.00
AP - 0026435 ] 3/5/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 125.00
AP - 00264352 3/5/2008 LOPEZ, GRACE 250.00
AP - 00264353 3/5/2008 LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT 250.00
AP - 00264354 3/5/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 239.21
AP - 00264355 3/5/2008 LUEVANOS, MARIA G 3,758.83
AP - 00264356 3/5/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 161.63
AP - 00264357 3/5/2008 MANELA, ROSE 19.90
AP - 00264357 3/5/2008 MANELA, ROSE 5.38
AP - 00264358 3/5/2008 MANTEK 530.93
AP - 00264359 3/5/2008 MARCARELLQ KAREN 1,047.00
AP - 00264360 3/5/2008 MARQUES, CLIFFORD 32.00
AP - 00264361 3/5/2008 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP 1,581.29
AP - 00264362 3/5/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 30.19
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 276.86
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 276.86
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 73.96
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 134.91
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 134.90
AP - 00264363 3/5/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 111.93
AP - 00264364 3/5/2008 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC R ELECTRONICS USA II 490.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264365 3/5/2008 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 25.00
AP - 00264366 3/5/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 81.63
AP - 00264366 3/5/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 55.94
AP - 00264367 3/5/2008 NASH, EDITH 500.00
AP - 00264368 3/5/2008 NATURES EARTH PRODUCTS INC 1,256.37
AP - 00264370 3/5/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 34,726.93
AP - 00264371 3/5/2008 NEW IMAGE COMMERCIAL FLOORING 494.98
AP - 00264372 3/5/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 72.00
AP - 00264372 3/5/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 40.00
AP - 00264373 3/5/2008 NOLO PRESS 48.58
AP - 00264375 3/5/2008 NOWAK, JOHN 21.50
AP - 00264376 3/5/2008 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 44.23
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.11
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 28.21
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 53.98
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 6.16
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 31.72
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 107.97
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.87
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.64
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.07
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 551.34
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.63
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 193.94
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPO"r 93.40
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 126.67
P68
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69
A>;enda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264377 3(5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 91.05
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 42.83
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.29
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,296.45
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.29
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 62.97
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -13.38
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 159.55
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,342.76
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 120.17
AP - 00264377 3/5/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -2.77
AP - 00264378 3/5/2008 OFFICE MAX 63.91
AP - 00264378 3/5/2008 OFFICE MAX 1,144.95
AP - 00264378 3/5/2008 OFFICE MAX 888.99
AP - 00264379 3/5/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 22.17
AP - 00264380 3/5/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 210.12
AP - 00264382 3/5/2008 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00
AP - 00264383 3/5/2008 PB AMERICAS INC 9,739.55
AP - 00264384 3/5/2008 PBS&J INC 4,477.38
AP - 00264385 3/5/2008 PEP BOYS 68.30
AP - 00264386 3/5/2008 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00
AP - 00264387 3/5/2008 PITNEY BOWES 206.88
AP - 00264387 3/5/2008 PITNEY BOWES 375.33
AP - 00264389 3/5/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 266.49
AP - 00264391 3/5/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 839.28
AP - 00264391 3/5/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 1,870.96
AP - 00264392 3/5/2008 QUIJADA, MELISSA 50.00
AP - 00264393 3/5/2008 QWEST 3.64
AP-00264393 3/5/2008 QWEST 5.57
AP - 00264394 3/5/2008 R H F INC 245.50
AP - 00264395 3/5/2008 R M DALTON ASSOCIATES LLC 2,850.00
AP - 00264396 3/5/2008 RAMIREZ, SANDRA 40.00
AP - 00264397 3/5/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL 500.00
AP - 00264398 3/5/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 500.00
AP - 00264399 3/5/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 202.09
AP - 00264399 3/5/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 202.09
AP - 00264400 3/5/2008 RASMUSSEN, MILT 400.00
AP - 00264401 3/5/2008 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 657.75
AP - 00264403 3/5/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 48.49
AP - 00264404 3/5/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 2,234.05
AP - 00264405 3/5/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 189.60
AP - 00264405 3/5/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 146.53
AP - 00264406 3/5/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 194.27
AP - 00264406 3/5/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 103.66
AP - 00264407 3/5/2008 REPUBLIC ITS ],249.87
AP - 00264408 3/5/2008 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 574.09
AP - 00264409 3/5/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 1,975.00
AP - 00264409 3/5/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2,005.00
AP - 00264409 3/5/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2,855.00
AP - 00264410 3/5/2008 RMA GROUP 846.00
AP - 00264411 3/5/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,183.20
AP - 00264411 3/5/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,183.20
AP - 00264412 3/5/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 160.00
AP - 00264413 3/5/2008 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 16.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Dale: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264415 3/5/2008 ROTO ROOTER 6,700.00
AP - 00264416 3/8/2008 RUBINO. JENNIFER 15.86
AP - 00264417 3/8/2008 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 196.18
AP - 00264418 3/8/2008 SAM, MAY LING 100.00
AP - 00264419 3/8/2008 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 150.00
AP - 00264420 3/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 293.59
AP - 00264421 3/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 228.00
AP - 00264422 3/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 21,817.00
AP - 00264423 3/8/2008 SANTOS, CHRISTINE 200.00
AP - 00264424 3/8/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 160.00
AP - 00264425 3/8/2008 SC FUELS 9,880.17
AP - 00264425 3/8/2008 SC FUELS 13,644.05
AP - 00264426 3/8/2008 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 259.14
AP - 00264427 3/8/2008 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 100.00
AP - 00264428 3/5/2008 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00
AP - 00264429 3/8/2008 SCOTT, MICHAEL 300.00
AP - 00264430 3/8/2008 SCWMF 30.00
AP - 00264430 3/8/2008 SCWMF 50.00
AP - 00264431 3/5/2008 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMIN 163.20
AP - 00264431 3/8/2008 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMIN 68.00
AP - 00264431 3/8/2008 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMIN 20.00
AP - 00264431 3/8/2008 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMIN 12.00
AP - 00264432 3/8/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250.00
AP - 00264433 3/5/2008 SHOETERIA 77.57
AP - 00264433 3/8/2008 SHOETERIA 92.11
AP - 00264436 3/5/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 192.06
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,066.36
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SS0.04
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 640.51
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 466.29
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 530.50
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,560.68
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,416.97
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 892.01
AP - 00264438 3/8/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,989.84
AP - 00264438 3/8/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 7,234.70
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,233.08
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 564.48
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.48
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1536
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 179.96
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.50
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.74
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.41
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 96.87
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.43
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.72
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.98
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.98
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I5.5I
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.34
AP - 00264440 3/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.56
P70
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P77
Agenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.14
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.01
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,813.37
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.28
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.14
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.80
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.63
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.80
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.42
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.60
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.99
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.11
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.66
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.32
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.06
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.53
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.47
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 352.42
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.69
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.58
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.29
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.82
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.47
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 166.13
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.16
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 592.50
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 250.93
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.22
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.67
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.23
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.00
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.84
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.95
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.93
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.74
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.08
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29
AP - 00264440 3/5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.58
AP - 00264442 3/5/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 230.00
AP - 00264442 3/5/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 1,196.00
AP - 00264443 3/5/2008 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 642.07
AP - 00264444 3/5/2008 SPORTS ILLUSTRATED 72.24
AP - 00264445 3/5/2008 STAR PERFORMANCE GROUP 6,096.00
AP - 00264446 3/5/2008 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 179.00
AP - 00264447 3/5/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 1,496.94
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p7p
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264447 3/S/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 877.]9
AP - 00264447 3/S/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00264448 3/S/2008 STOFA, JOSEPH 13.00
AP - 00264449 3/S/2008 STONE, IDA 49.49
AP - 00264450 3/S/2008 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 1,917.00
AP - 00264451 3/5/2008 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 3,000.00
AP - 00264451 3/S/2008 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 38.06
AP - 00264452 3/S/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 3,000.00
AP - 00264453 3/5/2008 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 64.65
AP - 00264453 3/S/2008 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 166.58
AP - 00264454 3/5/2008 T MOBILE 329.74
AP - 00264454 3/5/2008 T MOBILE 62.20
AP - 00264454 3/5/2008 T MOBILE 294.64
AP - 00264454 3/S/2008 T MOBILE 62.40
AP - 00264455 3/5/2008 TENGKER, JIMMY 382.00
AP - 00264456 3/S/2008 THOMPSON, DAVID SS0.00
AP - 00264457 3/5/2008 TIME WARNER TELECOM 6,918.45
AP - 00264459 3/S/2008 TLINGGALDJAJA, INGE 859.77
AP - 00264460 3/5/2008 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC 391.21
AP - 00264460 3/5/2008 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC 699.57
AP - 00264462 3/5/2008 LIMITED WAY 309.82
AP - 00264463 3/5/2008 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC 579.26
AP - 00264464 3/S/2008 VASTA, WILLIAM 18857
AP - 00264464 3/5/2008 VASTA, WILLIAM 188.56
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 87.88
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 43.64
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 205.48
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 2,415.83
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 78.92
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 88.82
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 34.81
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 32.64
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 32.62
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 69.20
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 161.08
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 32.55
AP-00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 20.]0
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 47.89
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 V ERIZON 86.32
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZOM 8882
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 8857
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 117.10
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 32.SS
AP - 00264467 3/S/2008 VERIZON 19.53
User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Asenda Check Resister
2/27/2008 through 3/] 1/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 360.68
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 34.56
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 33.66
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 453.89
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 51.27
AP - 00264467 3/5/2008 VERIZON 34.59
AP - 00264468 3/5/2008 Verizon 27.80
AP - 00264469 3/5/2008 Verizon 33.90
AP - 00264470 3/5/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 277.18
AP - 00264471 3/5/2008 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 175.00
AP - 00264472 3/5/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 286.30
AP - 00264472 3/5/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 672.62
AP - 00264473 3/5/2008 VILLANUEVA, MARISABEL 500.00
AP - 00264473 3/5/2008 VILLANUEVA, MARISABEL 500.00
AP - 00264474 3/5/2008 VINEYARD LITTLE LEAGUE 250.00
AP - 00264475 3/5/2008 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,312.32
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 189.08
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 119.54
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 84.67
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO -231.48
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 40.52
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 138.65
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 601.00
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 117.72
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 52.94
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 119.91
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 727.32
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 466.56
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 107.75
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 278.73
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 183.49
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 238.16
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 55.27
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,010.19
AP - 00264476 3/5/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 568.92
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 31.89
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 891.78
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 93.54
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 106.12
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAX[E SANITARY SUPPLY 82.25
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 297.39
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 730.81
AP - 00264477 3/5/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,190.75
AP - 00264478 3/5/2008 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,127.06
AP - 00264479 3/5/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 17.78
AP - 00264480 3/5/2008 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10
AP - 00264481 3/5/2008 WESTCOAST MEDIA 824.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WES"TERN UNIVERSITY 15.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00
P73
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Curren[ Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74
AP.enda Check ReEister
2/27/2008 through 3/11/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264482 3/5(2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00
AP - 00264482 3/5/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00
AP - 00264483 3/5/2008 WILLIAMS, ANGELA CRENSHAW 41.00
AP - 00264484 3/5/2008 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 725.00
AP - 00264485 3/5/2008 WORLD BOOK INC 139.35
AP - 00264487 3/5/2008 YALE CHASE MATERIALS HANDLING INC 243.50
AP - 00264488 3/5/2008 YEE, LARRY 12.00
AP - 00264488 3/5/2008 YEE, LARRY 25.00
AP - 00264490 3/10/2008 RAMIREZ, JOSE 300.00
Total for Check ID AP: 2,207,122.56
Total for Entity: 2,207,122.56
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 03/12/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:51:3
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 29, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Investments Par
Value Market
Value Book
Value % of
Portfolio
Term Days to
Maturity YTM
360 Equiv. YTM
365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Fund 32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15 16.93 1 1 4.104 4.167
CalTmst Short-Term Fund (JPA) 10,002 777.89 10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 5.26 1 1 3.3fi3 3.410
Certificates of DeposiUNeg. -Bank 13,000,000.00 13,035,070.50 13,000,000.00 6.83 117 76 3.738 3.790
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 103,925,000.00 105,316,512.98 103,854,765.00 54.57 1,548 7,016 4.548 4.611
Federal Agency Issues -Discount 10,000,000.00 9,997,000.13 9,978,209.72 5.24 29 6 2.666 2.703
Treasury Securities -Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,150,000.00 5,002,343.75 2.63 661 364 4.654 4.719
Investment Agreements 16,244,865.96 16,244,865.96 16,244,865.96 8.54 1 1 3.632 3.682
190,394,785.00 191,968,368.59 190,305,103.47 100.00% 872 570 4.181 4.239
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking 426,127.20 426,127.20 426,127.20 1 1 0.197 0.200
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase 977.78 977.78
Subtotal 427,104.96 427,104.98
Total Cash and Investments 190,820,912.20 192,395,473.57 190,732,206.45 872 570 4.181 4.239
Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 714,882.95 5,662,588.87
Average Daily Balance 194,270,114.30 193,847,401.76
Effective Rate of Return 4.63°/ 4.37%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted December 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
govern the management of these funds. On October 21, 2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegon(fransamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will
earn interest at 6.00% per annum through June 26, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement
will earn interest at 2~The average annual rate of return over the fve ear period is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above.
3 7a/>
ame .Frost, reasurer
Reporting period 0 2/0112 0 0 8-0 2/2 912 0 0 8
Run Dare: 0?/122006 -15:50
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) symRept 6 41.202b
Renon Ver. 5.00
V
Ul
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Dale Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity Dale
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15 4.161 4.104 1
Subtotal and Average 34,753,175.63
32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15 32,222,141.15
CalTrust Short-Terre Fund (JPA)
SYS1331 1331 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND
Subtotal and Average 1,379,406.13
02/26/2008 10,002,777.69
10,002,777.69
10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89
4.104
3.363
3.363
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. -Bank
90531CDE9 1325 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 01/09/2008 8,000,000.00
90531CFF4 1332 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 02/07/2008 5,000,000.00
Subtotal and Average 11,965,517.24
13,000,000.00
10,002,777.89 10,002,777.89 3.410
8,035,280.00 8,000,000.00
4,999,702.50 5,000,000.00
13,035,070.50 13,000,000.00
3.738 76
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
313310M79 1205
31331TWH0 1253
31331X705 1297
31331XA36 1309
31331YDH0 1316
3133XJVL9 1294
3133XKUH6 1308
3133XL304 1310
3133XLAH6 1312
3133XLBS7 1313
3133XMS77 1314
3133XMZT1 1317
3128XiBD8 1198
3128X1JD0 1208
3128X2P25 1257
3128X07G8 1256
3128X5R75 1298
3128XSR75 1302
3128XSK80 1306
3128X60R0 1318
3128X6RV0 1319
3136F32F2 1222
3736FBFW0 1301
Run Date' 03/12/2008 -15:50
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 2,001,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 94 06/03/2008
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 i6 03/17/2008
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,009,375.00 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,488 03/28/2012
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 4,000,000.00 4,268,750.00 4,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,180 05/25/2011
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/13/2007 2,500,000.00 2,532,812.50 2,499,375.00 4.650 4.594 1,168 05/13/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,314,062.50 5,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,105 03/11/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,070,000.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,179 05/24/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,141,250.00 4,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,550 05/29/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 3,000,000.00 3,027,187.50 3,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,570 06/18/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,026,250.00 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 846 06/25/2010
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/01/2007 2,500,000.00 2,539,062.50 2,500,000.00 4.870 4.803 1,342 11/03/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/13/2007 1,570,000.00 1,591,096.88 1,570,000.00 4.690 4.826 1,168 05/13/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 5,007,364.88 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 79 05/19/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 5,003,254.70 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 102 06/11/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 3,003,690.03 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 394 03/30/2009
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,251,873.78 1,248 750.00 3.650 3.626 67 05/07/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2007 2,000,000.00 2,023,416.14 1,996,600.00 5.250 5.217 1,475 03/15/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/04/2007 3,000,000.00 3,035,124.21 2,993,400.00 5.250 5.228 1,475 03/15/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,072,015.38 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,462 03/02/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/19/2007 2,500,000.00 2,535,752.49 2,500,000.00 4.500 4.438 628 11/19/2009
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 12/03/2007 2,500,000.00 2,526,282.50 2,500,000.00 4.320 4.261 1,006 12/02/2010
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 4,007,500.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 150 07/29/2008
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2007 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5.430 5.356 1,101 03/07/2011
4.200 4.200 117 06/26/2006
3.000 3.000 11 03/12/2008
PoAfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep1641 202b
v
rn
Repot Var. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
February 29, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Baok Value Rate Mootly's 360 Matudry Date
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3136F8LU7 1304 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,021,875.00 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,164 05/09/2011
31398ABC5 1307 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 3,000,000.00 3,056,250.00 2,991,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,528 05/07/2012
31398ADF6 1311 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000000.00 4,033,750.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,564 06/12/2012
31398AJK9 1315 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/05/2007 3,000,000.00 3,037,500.00 3,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 979 11/05/2010
31398AKV3 1320 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/28/2007 2,000,000.00 2,021,875.00 2,000,000.00 4.400 4.340 1,026 12/22/2010
31398ANC2 1333 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/71/2008 5,000,000.00 5,009,375.00 4,993,000.00 3.125 3.131 1,077 02/11/2011
3138F82D6 1334 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/13/2008 2,105,000.00 2,125,392.19 2,100,790.00 3.625 3.629 1,444 02/13/2012
3136F84J7 1335 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/14/2008 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 3,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1,445 02/14/2012
Subtotal and Average 110,876,775.60 103,925,000.00 105,716,512.96 10J,854,765.00 4.548 1,016
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
3133847X7 1329 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/07/2008 5,000,000.00 4,999,500.28 4,989,987.50 2.670 2.675 4 03/05/2008
313588UC7 1330 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/07/2008 5,000,000.00 4,997,499.85 4,988,222.22 2.650 2.656 9 03/10/2008
Subtotal antl Average 13,287,050.9] 10,000,000.00 9,997,000.13 9,978,209.72 2.666 6
Treasury Securities -Coupon
912828GJ3 1305 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,150,000.00 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 364 02/28/2009
Subtotal antl Average 5,002,343.75 5,000,000.00 5,150,000.00 5,002,343.75 4.654 364
Investment Agreements
SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 16,244,865.9fi 16,244,865.96 16,244,865.96 3.682 3.632 1
Subtotal antl Average 16,213,489.79 16,244,865.96 16,244,865.96 16,244,865.96 3.6J2 1
Total and Average 194,270,114.J0 190,394,785.00 191,968,368.59 190,J05,103.47 4.181 570
Run Dale: 03/12/2009- 15'.50
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b V
V
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
February 29, 2008
Page 4
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts
SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 426,127.20 426,127.20 426,127.20 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 Aamed Interest at Purchase 977.78 977.78 1
Subtotal 427,104.98 427,104.98
Total Cash and lnvestmentss 194,270,114.30
190,820,912.20 192,395,473.57 190,732,208.45
4.181 570
Run Date: 03/122008- 15:50
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRepl641 202b V
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits
Page 5
Redemptions Ending
or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
SV500005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 4.161 25,500,00800 22,700,000.00
Subtotal 29,422,141.15 25,500,000.00 22,700,000.00 32,222,141.15
CalTrust Short•Term Fund (JPA)
SYS1331 1331 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 3.410
Subtotal 0.00
1a,9oz,777.fis
70,002,777.89
10,002,777.99
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. -Bank
90531CFF4 1332 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3.000 02/07/2008
Subtotal 8,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
73,000,000.00
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
313310K55 1199
31331TND9 1244
37331TWJ6 1254
31331TG62 1263
31331XNU2 1295
3133X1 P27 1237
3133XAR25 1277
3133XAMW4 1279
3128X5C48 1293
3136F5EE7 1250
3136FSGP0 1252
3136F6Y06 1278
31398ANC2 1333
3136F82D6 1334
3136F84J1 1335
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.120 02/11/2008 0.00 2,496,875.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3 970 02/15/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.550 02/12/2008 0.00 3,997,500.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.920 02/07/2008 0.00 3,479,000.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.350 02/12/2008 0.00 5,000,000.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.000 02/07/2008 0.00 1,333,333.32
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.080 02/19/2008 0.00 1,000,000.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.000 02/22/2008 0.00 999,750.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 5.375 02/08/2008 0.00 5,000,000.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.750 02/04/2008 0.00 2,999,062.50
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 4040 02/04/2008 0.00 4,000,000.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 4.000 02/22/2008 0.00 1,998,600.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.125 02/11/2008 4,993,000.00 0.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.625 02/13/2008 2,100,790.00 0.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.625 02/14/2008 3,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 128,065,095.82 10,093,790.00 34,304,120.82
103,854,765.00
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
313384TR0 1327
313384TR0 1327
313384TP4 1328
313384TP4 1328
3133847X7 1329
313588UC7 1330
Run Oale'. 03/12/2009 -15:50
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.670 02/12/2008 8,989,320.00 0.00
02/28/2008 0.00 8,989,320.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.600 02/22/2008 2,999,133.33 0.00
02/26/2008 0.00 2,999,133.33
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.670 02/07/2008 4,989,987.50 0.00
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 2.650 02/07/2008 4,988,222.22 0.00
Portfolio CITY
C'D
PM (PRF PM3) 6ymRept 6.41.20: ~
Repon Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investmen[# Issuer Balance Rate Dale or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Page 6
Subtotal 0.00 21,966,663.05 11,986,453.33 9,976,209.72
Treasury Securities • Coupon
Subtotal 5,002,743.75 5,002,747.75
Investment Agreements (Monthly Summary)
SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 3.682 32,496.75 0.00
Subtotal 16,212,369.21 72,496.75 0.00 16,244,865.96
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 0.00 379,307.60
Subtotal 805,d34.80 0.00 779,307.60 426,127.20
Total 187,507,784.73 72,595,727.69 69,371,881.75 190,731,230.67
Portfolio CITY
C ~
Run Dete: 03/12200a - 15'.50 PM (PRF_PM3) 9ymRept 6.<1.20: Q
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended January 3t, 2008
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Paving Agent Accoun[ Name Investment Data Date Yield Value
Assessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo Imprvmnt Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A' 2.58% $ 287,110.07
Masi Plaza Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A 2.58% 243,097.50
Redemp. Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A' 2.58% 4,897.97
$ 535,105.54
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series Wells Fargo Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 0.00% $ -
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 2.58°h 589,186.58
Sr. Resrv. Fund FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 2.58% 1,106,858.37
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 2.54% 434.43
Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A` 2.58% 77,443.13
Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A` 2.58% 478,114.78
$ 2,252,037.29
CFD No 2000-03 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.61% $ 1,538.82
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 10!13/2005 N/A 2.58% 710,195.35
Escrow Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 0.00% -
Project Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.58% 6,559,109.66
Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.58% 142,299.11
Interest Account Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.62% 191.46
Principal Acwunt Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.28% 44.01
$ 7,413,378.41
CFD No 2000-01 South Etiwanda Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 2.58% $ 2,217.57
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 2.58% 111,693.24
Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 3.22% 62.32
Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 2.92% 90,505.65
Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0.00% 15.95
Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0.00% 15.42
$ 204,510.15
OD
Bond Issue
CFD No 2000-02 RC Corporate Park
CFD No 2003-07 Improvement Areas #i
Trustee andlor
Pavino Anent
Wells Fargo
Account Name
Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Admin Expense Fund
Acquisition Fund
Interest Account
Principal Account
Purchase Maturity Cost
Investment Date Date Yield Value
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 NIA
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Money Market Fund 6/31/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 NIA
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/112003 N/A
Cultural Center Fund Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
2.58% $ 13,540.37
2.58% 681,988.39
3.22% 62.32
2.92% 572,235.26
2.35% 85.39
1.75% 57.28
$ 1,267,969.01
2.58% $ 5,625.51
2.58% 1,468,091.48
2.58% 510,128.68
2.58% 425,632.80
2.58% 511,149.23
2.58% 23,727.18
0.00% 8.80
$ 2,944,363.68
CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0.00%
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/112003 N/A 2.58%
Interest Account Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 2.58%
Agency Project Fund Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0.00%
Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0.00%
CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #1 & #2 Wells Fargo
Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund
Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund
Interest Account Money Market Fund
Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund
Principal Account Money Market Fund
Redemption Fund Money Market Fund
$ 0.04
289,761.71
14,389.16
0.18
2.21
$ 304,153.30
9/18/2001 N/A 2.57% $ 38.94
9/18/2001 N/A 2.58% 1,106,109.72
9/18/2001 1/4/1900 2.57% 5,032.95
9/18/2001 N/A 2.57% 3,860.00
9/18/2001 N/A 2.72°/ 184.13
9/18/2001 N/A 2.58% 161,804.96
8/31/2006 NIA 2.73% 110.15
9/18/2001 N/A 2.58% 2,158,933.31
$ 3,436,074.16
N
Bond Issue
CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #3
CFD No 2004-07 Rancho Etrvvanda Estates
CFD Na 2006-01 Vintner's Grove
CFD No 2006-02 Amador on Route 66
Trustee andlor
Paving Agent Account Name Investment
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund
Admin Exp. Fund Money Markel Fund
Interest Account Money Market Fund
Principal Account Money Market Fund
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Escrow Fund
Project Fund
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Principal Account
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Acquisition Fund
Agency Account
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Water District Acwunt
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Acquisition Fund
Agency Account
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Water District Fund
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS
Purchase
Date
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
8131 /2006
8/31 /2006
Maturity
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Markel Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/2512007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
`Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
Cost
Yield Value
2.61% $ 1,576.37
2.58% 78,568.20
2.57% 9,042.55
2.58% 32,361.00
0.00% 13.81
0.00% 6.62
$ 121,568.55
0.00% $ 10.15
2.92% 3,771,568.75
o.oo°r° o.oo
2.92% 2,056,991.32
0.00% 0.00
2.87% 628.36
2.92% 240.84
$ 5,229,439.42
0.00% $ -
3.07% 382,468.45
3.07% 3,028,276.31
3.07% 770,128.88
3.07% 108,960.08
3.07% 22,040.06
3.07% 687,489.52
$ 4,999,363.30
0.00% $ -
3.07% 199,956.36
3.07% 311,296.52
3.07% 436,291.43
3.07% 81,894.36
3.07% 11,478.87
3.07% 624,183.18
$ 1,665,100.72
30,373,063.53
$ 30,373,063.53
DO
W
s~ i ~~ . P84
r. -
~~ .:~:'
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T
Staff Report
DATE: March 19, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, DCM Community Development
BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Man er
SUBJECT: Approval to authorize the adverting of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Street
Name Sign Replacement, Phase 6, to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5300 as
approved in the FY 2007/08 budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Citywide Street Name Sign
Replacement, Phase 6" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from account
number 1025001-5300 as approved in the FY 2007/08 budget.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On April 2, 2003, City Council approved Phase 1 of the citywide street name sign replacement program. The County Box
Blades street name signs were replaced from west City Limits to Hellman Avenue. Phases 2 through 5 replaced the
remaining County Box Blade and Extruded Blade street name signs along major arterials, collectors and residential
streets with the highly retroreflective materials.
Phase 6 will continue the trend of standardizing the residential and collector streets with the new street name sign
specification of the highly retroreflective material. Scheduled areas for standardization will complete the residential and
collector streets west of Haven Avenue and the residential and collector streets between Haven Avenue -Milliken Avenue
and Deer Canyon Drive -Base Line Rd. The new street name signs have been well received by the community and
emergency response agencies. The total estimate of signs to be replaced in this phase is709 street name signs.
Future phases (depending on funding availability) will standardize remaining street name signs on residential and collector
streets moving east from Haven Avenue.
Engineer's estimate for Phase 6 of this project is $60,000
R spe ully subm e~
Ma di u ri
DCM C munity Development
MA:DB:jh
P85
RESOLUTION NO. ~ $-O5 D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to
construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepazed
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for the "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the
work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE
OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR
OF 2:00 P.M. ON April 23, 2008 sealed bids or proposals for "CITYWIDE STREET NAME
SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730.
Bids must be made on a fonn provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BID FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6."
A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for April 15, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91729, where
bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications.
THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be
documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the
Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process.
P86
Resolution No.
Page 2
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to
pay not less than. the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in
the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages aze on file
in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer,
workman, or mechanic employed for each calendaz day or portion thereof, if such laborer,
workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated
for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provision of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will
be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases
shall not be less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has
exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or
2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or
3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his
contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
P87
Resolution No.
Page 3
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship,
San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standazds and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth
in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments aze defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is
awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the
difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned
to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to
secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and
the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
P88
Resolution No.
Page 4
including but not limited to an "A" (General Engineering Contractor), or "D-42" (Sign
Installation), or "C-32" (Parking and Highway Improvement Contractor). In accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be
signed by the Contractor declaring under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is
true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the
office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FNE DOLLARS) is
non-refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said
request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable
payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
Questions regarding tbis Notice Inviting Bids for CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6 may be directed to:
Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Maintenance Superintendent
9153 Ninth St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
(909) 477-2700, ext. 4108
(909)477-2731, fax
By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 19"' day of March 2008
ADVERTISE ON: April March 25, 2008 and April 8, 2008.
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEP~IRTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Jonathan Wu, Senior Civil Engineer ~yt~
P89
a
RANCHO
cUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE HE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23
LOCATIONS TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS ACCOUNT NOS.
11243035650/1582124-0, 1 1 2430 3 56 5 0/1 5 9 1 1 24-0, 1124303560/1592124-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the Construction of '
Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations; and approve the attached resolution
authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The construction of the Traffic Signal Interconnection System generally consists of upgrading the
existing traffic signal controllers, installing communication cables, and implementing timing at 23
locations along Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Gardens Lane and Archibald Avenue. The project is
to be funded from Transportation funds, Account No's. 11243035650/1582124-0,
11243035650/1591124-0, 1124303560/1592124-0. Staff has determined that the project is
categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CECtA guidelines.
The Engineer's estimate for the interconnection system is $200,000. Legal advertising is scheduled
for March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 8, 2008.
submitted,
Mahdi ~
Deputy
MA:JTW
Manager/Community Development
Attachment
flt ' ~ r ,I ~
-I - -r
_
II °r~ r ' ;HILL IDES
~ Z-J-~ ~TI `' I'-e
i '
~ „
SANTINA
_i
_ ~, `r , ', ~ ~ ,`Yrl J
'
~~ ~
I . J
~- ~ ~'
~
HI -SIDE ,r r-
.- -1
ea
-
-- ~
- 1 ~ r
,
~ L
~
~'
, I~4 _
-
-
-
~ _
,~ ILL
~ :"~+1 ~T ~_1ff{ .,.,,.~
---=-~Ti ~~~j 1r =C`,
_~.
g., .;
~ ,~_
_ ~~~'
1 ~:_~:
~ ill
~ L fl-
u
-
{ N _,
L
_ .{ ~
iri-L~^' -E~1~5 J'~ CI -_77i=
CC TE
-
-- =~~,~-
,.~:
i~
~ JERFEY
,J ~
--
, 7TH m J z ti i ~ ~
i~T 4 6
_
JL
6Tf+I~cU
v ' '
j ~ I I
.F~?;~ _~i +; ; dTH ~ i rID _
~~ ~
1
~
~~ ~ ~
~
..1 Ui'r~~I
O'
i '
JLy
~
~ = s 1
- I
~ ~'
~
~/ ~ -,,.
~ 1
r h'v ~.L`,'~ WILSON
~I( ,--~
.-L •
-_ A
-
~, ~ r,; ~ ~ 1,s -~ ,, ; -
^_, r ~
~- - -
~ 1210
~~ ; B~4CS~i}NE.I
• Synchronized Intersection
`U`""'°
~~°
°> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.O
f
~,
°
VICINITY MAP
19T
P91
RESOLUTION NO. O $"' O S9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC
SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications forthe construction
of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the
"Construction of Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations":
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and fgures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 8, 2008, sealed bids or proposals
for the "THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23
LOCATIONS " in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked "THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS":
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of perdiem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are
available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
P92
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 2
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractoror subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in thattradefora certificate
of approval. The certif Cate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices tojourneymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution
of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
P93
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 3
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar
day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check,
or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work stiall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance
with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code,
Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
P94
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 4
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon
written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request
is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment
of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-8.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 19'" day of March, 2008
Publish Dates: March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this
19th day of March, 2008.
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
P95
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 5
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19~' day
of March, 2008.
Executed this 19'h day of March, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEP~IRTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer
P96
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE FY 07/08 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF
VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS ACCOUNT NO.
11763035650/1022176 AND PROP. 42 FUNDS ACCOUNT N0.11903035650/1022190
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of FY
07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets and approve the attached
resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The scope of work for FY 07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets
consists of, but not limited to clearing and grubbing, cold planing, crack sealing, A.C. overlay, re-
striping and pavement markings. The project will be funded from Measure "I" funds, Account No.
11763035650/1022176 and Prop. 42 funds, Account No. 11903035650/1022190. Staff has
determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA
guidelines.
The Engineer's estimate for FY 07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various
Streets is $980,000.00 and legal advertising is scheduled for March 25, and April 1, 2008, with bid
opening scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday April 8, 2008.
City Manager/Community Development
MA:RMD
Attachments
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 2007/08 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ~ N
OVERLAY PROJECT
N.T.S.
O
P98
RESOLUTION NO. O c~'-Q 6 n
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2007/2008 LOCAL STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS
STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications forthe construction
of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifcations for the
construction of the FY 2007/2008 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various
Streets.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specifed
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and fgures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga
will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or
before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 8, 2008, sealed bids or proposals for the "Bid for
Construction of FY 2007/2008 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets "
in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of FY 2007/2008 Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of perdiem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of perdiem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are
available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
P99
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 2
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractoror subcontractoremploying tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution
of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
P100
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 3
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar
day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check,
or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with
the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
P101
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 4
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamdnga, and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon
written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request
is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment
of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 19th day of March, 2008
Publish Dates: March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this
19th day of March, 2008.
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19~"day
of March, 2008.
P102
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 5
Executed this 19`h day of March, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/C munity Development
By:, Neil Plummer, Facilities Coordinato
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer
P103
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE METROLINK RAILING RE-PAINT PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 36 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1133303-5304
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the Metrolink Railing
Re-Paint Project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the
"Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Metrolink Railing Re-Paint Project scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not
limited to, prepare, primer and repaint to match the existing, the vertical surfaces of the
approximately 2,400 linear feet of 36" high tubular fencing at the Metrolink station. The project is to
be funded from Landscape Maintenance District 3B funds, Account No. 1133303-5304. Staff has
determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 of the CEQA
guidelines.
The Engineer's estimate for the Metrolink Railing Re-Paint Project is $30,000.00. Legal advertising
is scheduled for March 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April
15, 2008, unless extended by Addenda.
City Manager/Community Development
MA:NP:SH
Attachments
P104
VICINITY MAP
METROLINK RAILING RE-PAINT
l' J
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P105
RESOLUTION NO. O8- Q ro
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE METROLINK RAILING RE-PAINT
PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City df Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications forthe construction
of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications forthe "Metrolink
Railing Re-Paint" Project:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 15, 2008, sealed bids or
proposals for the "Metrolink Railing Re-Paint" project in said City.
A pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on April 9, 2008 at 11208 Azusa Court, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA. This meeting will be a job walk at the Metrolink site where bidders may review the
site and present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals and Specifications.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Metrolink Railing Re-Paint" project.
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are
available to any interested parry on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
P106
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 2
such determinations to be posted at the job site
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendarday or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractoror subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall complywith the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator ofApprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution
P107
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 3
of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar
day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check,
or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C33"
License (Painting and Decorating Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's
License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and
regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed
P108
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 4
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon
written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifcationswill be mailed when said request
is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment
of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "Metrolink Railing Re-Paint" Project may be
directed to:
Neil Plummer, Facilities Coordinator
City of Rancho Cucamonga
(909) 477-2730, ext. 8056
Dated this 19th day of March, 2008
Publish Dates: March 25 and April 1, 2008
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this
19th day of March, 2008.
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor
P109
RESOLUTION NO.
March 19, 2008
Page 5
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19w day
of March, 2008.
Executed this 19'" day of March, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: March 25 and April 1, 2008
P110
STAFF REPORT
CO.VIIvfUNITY SERVICES DEP~1RT1v~fENT ~!`
RANCHO
Date: March 19, 2008 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor U~~
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM "4 A SAFE RI HOME"
ORGANIZATION FOR THE WAIVER OF CENTRAL PARK ROOM RENTAL
FEES FOR A FUNDRAISING EVENT TO BE HELD ON APRIL 6, 2008
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home", a
non-profit organization, for the waiver of the Central Park room rental fees for a fundraiser
scheduled for Sunday, April 6, 2008.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home", anon-profit organization, to
hold a BINGO fundraiser at Central Park Sunday, April 6, 2008. The mission of "4 A Safe
Ride Home" is to fund cab rides for individuals as an alternative to drinking and driving.
Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of rental fees associated with the
proposed BINGO fundraiser as it promotes a safe alternative to drinking and driving. The
organization would still be required to pay direct fees and charges associated with
obtaining permits and insurance to conduct their event and would have to comply with all
facility rental policies and regulations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees totals $697.00.
Resp ffully s miffed,
1
Kevi McArdle
Community Services Director
Attachment
l.' ICOMMSERVICouncil&BOardslCityCouncillSteHReports120081WaiverFees.4ASa/e Ride HomeFundraiser.3.19.08. doc
w~'`m°~~ P111
~.. ,
o:
8780 19`~ St. # 310 • Alta Loma, CA 91701 • Phone (909) 481-8300 • Fax (909) 481-4608
Dustin Plummcr a California Non-Profrt Corporation Tax JD # 20-8188875
.Ip. 419b - Oe~ A.'[006
<•wbdtls110m•LOm
February 21, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
11200 Baseline Rd.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Dear Kevin McArdel,
Last year the City Council and the City of Rancho Cucamonga offered to help support
our cause in promoting the dangers of drinking and driving and to help raise money to fund cab
rides for those in need of a safe alternative to drinking and driving. Well, it's working - to date,
we have provided over 1100 rides.
Once again, we aze in the process of planning our 2"d annual "Bingo" fundraising event to
be held on April 6, 2008, at the Rancho Cucamonga Community Center and are aslang for your
support by waiving the rental fees of $95.00 an hour as part of a collaborative effort to help make
our community a safer place.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (909) 481-8300. Thank
you for your support.
Since
r
Debbie Crowe
STAFF REPORT
P112
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director ~~ / ,
By: Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent~V`~l
Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION TO RENAME THE ARROW ROUTE
CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve
the proposed name "RC Family Resource Centel' as the new name for the Arrow Center.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Arrow Route Center is scheduled to open up in May of 2008 as anon-profit human
services center and needs to be renamed so that the community will be able to identify
this facility and understand its purpose. This facility was once called the Neighborhood
Center, Senior Center, TAC (Theater Arts Center) and most recently the Arrow Route
Center. Staff is suggesting that this facility be renamed so that the community may be
able to easily identify its purpose and so that staff could begin some advance marketing
prior to the opening of this facility.
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed and approved staffs recommendation
along with five alternatives. This proposed name has been used by a couple of other
cities for this same type of facility and was found to be one of the more self descriptive
names for such a facility. After consideration of numerous names, this one is
recommended because it refers to this facility as a place that can assist families and it
correctly implies that there are numerous resources within the facility to assist residents.
Furthermore, staff and the Commission were sensitive to consider the impression that
the facility name may have upon the community or potential attendees. Other names
that were considered could have dual meanings such as "RC Service Centel' (auto or
equipment repair facility) or RC Family Care Center (medical center) or some names
could be somewhat demeaning to its participants such as RC Family Help Center that
could have a similar effect as a 'Welfare or Unemployment officd' facility name. In
addition, the facility name of "Resource Maly' was not recommended as it is fast
becoming the more popular name for homeless shelters.
P113
APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO PAGE 2
RENAMETHEARROW ROUTE CENTER
MARCH 19, 2008
Attached for your reference is a copy of the staff report that was presented to the Park
and Recreation Commission meeting on February 21, 2008.
Kevin IW1cArdle
Community Services Director
Attachment: February 21, 2008 Park and Recreation Commission Staff Report
I: COM MS E RV\Counci 188oa rds\CityCouncil\StaffReport\2008\ArrowRouteCenterProposedNam es.03.19.08. doc
STAFF REPORT
COMIvfiJNITl SERVICES DEP:IRTMENT
Date: February 21, 2008
To: Park and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent '~
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NAME FOR THE
CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
P114
RANCxo:
CUCAMONGA
ARROW ROUTE
Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Commission approve the proposed name
"RC Family Resource Center" as the new name for the Arrow Center and forward their
recommendation to the City Council for final consideration.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Arrow Route Center is scheduled to open up in May of 2008 as anon-profit human
services center and needs to be renamed so that the community will be able to identify this
facility and understand its purpose. This facility was once called the Neighborhood Center,
Senior Center, TAC (Theater Arts Center) and most recently the Arrow Route Center.
Staff is suggesting that this facility be renamed so that the community may be able to
easily identify its purpose and so that staff could begin some advance marketing prior to
the opening of this facility.
Staff has considered many possible names and is recommending that the Park and
Recreation Commission approve a recommendation to the City Council to select "RC
Family Resource Center" as the new name for this facility. After consideration of over 30
different names this one is being recommended because it refers to this facility as a place
that can assist families and it correctly implies that there are numerous resources within
the facility to assist residents. In addition, this name is unlike several facilities out there
that refer to services exclusively for the homeless such as "Resource Malls". There are
very few facilities such as this in southern California that do not cater exclusively to the
homeless.
Staff was careful to consider the impression that the facility name may have upon the
community or potential attendees. Many names that were considered could imply different
meanings such as a "RC Service Center" (auto repair, equipment repair or other services),
"RC Family Care Center" (medical facility) or some facility names can be somewhat
demeaning when a name implies direct help such as "RC Family Help Center" and could
have the similar effect as a "Welfare or Unemployment office" facility name. In addition,
this particular name (RC Family Resource Center) is also used in a couple of other
communities for similar facilities. Staff discussed many other creative versions but found
themselves gravitating to this particular name for all the above reasons. Some of the
P115
CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NAME FOR THE ARROW ROUTE CENTER PncE 2
Goooi iecv 71 9rIf1R
following names were also considered as other top choices but also not as well liked or
discounted for some of the same reasons as mentioned above.
RC Family Services Center
RC Family Outreach Center
RC Multi-Service Center
RC Human Services Center
submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
I:COMMS ER V~Council&Boards\Park&Rec\StaffReport\2008\ArrowRouteCanterProposed Nam es.02.21.08
STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~LYy~~
1~RA~NC HBO ~
Date: March 19, 2008 (;UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent ~~~~ ~~
Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION TO IMPLEMENT ANON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION FACILITY USE
ELIGIBILITY POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the
attached Non-Profit Organization Use of Community Centers & Meeting Facilities Eligibility
Policy.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Park and Recreation Commission has identified a need to implement a policy that places
greater controls on non-profit organizations that rent city meeting facilities at a discounted rate.
Over the years, there have been a number of issues that warrant such a policy that would insure
all non-profit organizations are utilizing City facilities for their intended purpose and for activities
that actually serve the residents of Rancho Cucamonga.
The attached draft policy proposes that a system be implemented that uses the City's facility
registration software system to manage a list of pre-approved non-profit organizations and
selected organization contacts. Attached is a recommended policy for review that provides
some suggested guidelines on how to implement this amended process. In addition, the
previous two staff reports addressed to the Park and Recreation Commission are also attached
for City Council's reference.
Community Services Director
Attachment: Non-Profit Organization Use of City Community Centers & Meeting
Facilities Eligibility Policy
Non-Profit Eligibility Application
January 17"' and February 21~` Park and Recreation Commission Staff Reports
P116
I: CO M MS E RV\Counci 18Boa rds\CilyCouncil\SfaffReport\2008\NonP rogitOrg FacilityUsePolicy.03.19.O8.doc
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION USE OF CITY
COMMUNITY CENTERS & MEETING
FACILITIES ELIGIBILITY POLICY
POLICY NO.:
PAGE: 1 of 2
EFFECTIVE:
REVISED:
APPROVED:
500-61
March 20, 2008
SUBJECT: DEFINE THE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS' ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS FOR USE OF CITY COMMUNITY CENTERS AND
MEETING FACILITIES.
PURPOSE: To specify guidelines and parameters that identifies the eligibility requirements
and process for non-profit organizations requesting the use of City community
centers or meeting facilities.
POLICY: The following procedures will be used in determining whether non-profit
organizations are eligible to use City community centers or meeting facilities
under the Group 2 fee classification.
GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has further refined its current eligibility requirements of non-
profitorganizations that request the use of City community centers or meeting facilities. This
pertains to those non-profit organizations that provide a significant service to the community
that has been approved by the City and are requesting meeting space at a City facility. The
following guidelines will provide a more detailed description of what types of non-profit
organizations are eligible for the use of City facilities under the discounted Group 2 fee
classification.
All non-profit organizations are to submit the following information to staff a minimum
of twenty-one calendar days in advance of their first rental under these new
guidelines which must also be approved priorto any request for City meeting facilities
is considered.
a. A completed Non-Profit Eligibility Application including a list of reservation
representatives who are members of their board and able to request use of City
facilities on behalf of that organization.
Organization is to submit with the above application a roster (s) listing all of their
participants, their names, addresses and phone numbers. This information will
be kept confidential and will be used for internal purposes only and for proof of
residency.
c. Organization must be located and based in Rancho Cucamonga and their roster
must include at least 51 % residency to be eligible. If the organization is unable
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION ELIGIBILITY FOR FACILITY USE POLICY
PAGE 2
to determine their level of residency due to the type of activity or roster
confidentiality issues then that group must justify or demonstrate in writing to
staff that their use of that facility will provide a significant benefit to Rancho
Cucamonga residents. The Director of Community Services will determine
whether it is a significant benefit to the community.
d. Organization must also submit a current proof of non-profit status by the State of
California such as a "Determination Letter." If it is a new organization that has
not obtained one yet then they will have six months to obtain one and will be
permitted room use until then as long as everything listed above has been
submitted. The six month period will commence on the date that their
application was submitted or received by the State of California. However, they
must submit a copy of their application to the State to City staff to validate that
their application is in the process of being considered.
2. Once approved, each organization will be listed on a City operated data base under
CLASS that can be viewed but not amended by any City facility coordinator or
supervisory staff. This information will be referred to any time a facility request form
has been submitted by that organization requesting a Group 2 rate orwaiver of fees.
Only those organizations listed on this data base and their selected representatives
may apply for the use of City facilities under the discounted rate (Group 2 fees) or
waived fee.
3. If an organization wants to amend their list of representatives who are eligible to
reserve City facilities then they must do so in writing and submit it to staff a minimum
of twenty-one calendar days prior to their requested date of facility use.
4. The reservation representative of each non-profit organization must bean adult 25
years or older and a member of that organization's board or be the actual event
coordinator if a board doesn't exist. That same person must attend the event or
meeting during all of the times that the facility was requested and be available to site
staff if needed.
All non-profit organizations are to follow all reservation policies and procedures. In
addition, all fees must be submitted by the same representative listed on the
application and City data base listing each organization's approved reservation
representatives.
6. Those non-profit organizations that have entered into a city recognized partnership
with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department will be exempt from
this process and fees. This might include some of those organizations that provide
critical services (medical care, drug counseling, food & clothing distribution, etc) to
the community and have been invited by City staff to provide a service at a City
facility.
7. All non-profit organizations must reapply by resubmitting the Non-Profit Eligibility
Application and be approved once every two years including updated participant
rosters.
8. All non-profit organizations that are not approved underthis process to receive facility
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION ELIGIBILITY FOR FACILITY USE POLICY
PAGE 3
use under the Group 2 fee classification will be charged the appropriate fees for the
group classification (Group 1-4) criteria that they qualify under.
9. All organizations must adhere to all City policies and rules governing the use of
facilities or may forfeit all future reserved dates and the ability to request for City
facilities in the future.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department ~,.
- NON-PROFIT ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION ~~QP~2°
Please print legibly in ink. _ _'-~^°-
~~`- -
Application Process:
This application should be submitted to the Community Services Department 21 calendar davs prior to the date requested in
order to insure adequate approval time. This is an application only and is used to determine the eligibility of an organization
for non-profit group rates and establishment of an official contact representative (s) that may reserve City facilities on behalf
of their organization. If this application is approved then only the representative (s) listed on this application may submit
facility request forms for use of City facilities and be eligible for non-profit group rental rates.
Proof of Residency:
All non-profit groups must submit a complete roster (names, address, City/Zip code and phone number) of their members or
participants demonstrating an overall Rancho Cucamonga residency rate of 51% or higher to qualify for non-profit rental
rates. Organizations that cannot provide a roster because they are unable to identify their participants in advance or due to
strict confidentiality rules by their organization then they must submit a letter to justify or demonstrate to the Community
Services Director that their use of the facility will provide a significant benefit to the community in order to be considered for a
non-profit rental rate under Group 2 Fee Classification. All roster information submitted will be kept confidential and only
used to determine residency. Submittal of rosters for verification of residency must occur once every two (2) years.
Proof of Non-Profit Status:
A Determination Letter from the State of California must also be submitted confirming the organization's non-profit status with
a copy of the organization's charter. If an organization has submitted an application to the State then a copy of that State
application must be submitted with this one to validate that they are in the process of being considered by the State.
Facility Use:
All non-profit community based youth organizations are permitted one free board meeting or membership meeting per
month. Each non-profit youth sports group may use one room without charge for participant registration no more than twice
prior to their season and no more than four hours for each use. Non-profit groups who require room use beyond the above
criteria and meet all residency and verification of non-profit status are charged the Group 2 building rental hourly fees.
Organization Non-Profit #
Organization mailing address: Web site address:
Organization E-mail address: Phone number:
Description of organization's service to the community:
Each non-profit organization may select one representative and an alternate to request use of City facilities. Please list them below.
Contact Name Street Address
City Zip Primary Phone ()
Secondary Phone ( ) Fax () E-Mail
Contact Name (Alternate) Street Address
City Zip Primary Phone ( )
Secondary Phone ( ) Fax ( ) E-Mail
1. Have complete group participant rosters been submitted demonstrating 51 % or higher residency? ^ Yes ^ No
2. If rosters cannot be provided then has a letter of justification been submitted and approved? ^ Yes ^ No
3. Has a Determination Letter from the State of California been submitted validating the correct non-profit status? ^ Yes ^ No
4. Has a copy of the requesting organization's charter been submitted? ^ Yes ^ No
Registration Coordinator Signature:
Community Services Superintendent Signature:
Date: /
Date:
(Staff signature only acknowledges that the above organization has been approved to use City facilities at a non-profit group
rate in addition to establishing authorized group contacts. It does not approve any specific facility reservation that can only be
accomplished by submittal and approval of a Facility Use Request form.)
P121
STAFF REPORT . ,-
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT "~~'
f RANCHO
Date: February 21, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To: Park and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Dave Moore, Community Services Superintenden
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A NON-PROFIT O NIZATION FACILITY
(COMMUNITY CENTERS AND MEETING FACILITIES) USE ELIGIBILITY
POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Commission approve the attached Non-
profit Organization Use of Community Centers & Meeting Facilities Eligibility Policy.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
A draft copy of this policy was reviewed by the Park & Recreation Commission at their
January meeting and the Commission had requested staff to bring back this item 'for
further review once specific revisions had been made to the policy. The intent of this
policy is to develop greater controls on facility requests of Community Centers and
meeting facilities by non-profit organizations. The attached draft policy proposes that a
system be implemented that uses the City's facility registration software system to develop
a list of pre-approved non-profit organizations and selected organization contacts.
Attached is a revised draft policy for review that provides some suggested guidelines on
how to implement this amended process.
submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
Attachment: Non-Profit Organization Use of City Community Centers & Meeting
Facilities Eligibility Policy
I:COM MS ER V~Council&Boa rds\Park&ReclStaffReport\2007\NonProgitOrg FacilityU sePol icy.02.21.08
STAFF REPORT
CpMMLIN[TY SERVI~S DEPARTMENT
RANCxo
cUCAMONGA
Date: January 17, 2008
To: Park and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By:. Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION FACILITY
(COMMUNITY CENTERS AND MEETING FACILITIES) USE
ELIGIBILITY POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Commission approve the attached
Non-Profit Organization Use of Community Centers & Meeting Facilities Eligibility
Policy.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
A number of months ago at a Park & Recreation Commission meeting, the
Commission requested staff to develop a policy that provides greater controls on
facility requests of Community Centers and meeting facilities by non-profit
organizations. The attached draft policy proposes that a system be implemented that
uses the City's facility registration software system to develop a list of pre-approved
non-profit organizations and selected organization contacts. Attached is a draft
policy for review that provides some suggested guidelines on how to implement this
amended process. Staff would like to get the Commission's comments and thoughts
on this draft policy when it is discussed at the upcoming Park and Recreation
Commission meeting.
submitted,
Kevin 15~cArdle
Community Services Director
Attachment: Non-Profit Organization Use of City Community Centers & Meeting
Facilities Eligibility Policy
Non-Profit Eligibility Application
I: COMMSE RVtCounGl&Boards\ParkBRec\StaffReport\2007\NonP rogltOrgFacilityUsePOlicy.01.17.08
P122
P62
STAFF REPORT
P123
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008 RANCHO
cUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director
By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Subject: APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation programs,
projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs
occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided to the City Council for
informational purposes only.
Seniors:
• The table on the following page highlights some senior activities that take took place during
February 2008 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass.
Activity Date Number of
Partici ants
Pool Tournament Februa 1, 2008 16
Black Histo Month Februa 7, 2008 80
Senior Bi Band Dance Februa 7, 2008 110
Valentine Da Part Februa 14, 2008 220
Senior Birthda s Februa 27, 2008 150
Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered - 719
Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered - 251
Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered - 252
• Upcoming Senior Activities are summarized below:
Activit Date Time
Pool Tournament March 7,2008 1:00 .m.
Senior Bi Band Dance March 8, 2008 7:00 .m.
St Patrick's Da March 13, 2008 9:30 a.m.
Senior Birthda s March 26, 2008 11:30 a.m.
• The Senior Advisorv Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, March 24, 2008 at
9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center.
P124
APPROVAL OF THE COMMLJI`IITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARCH 19, 2008
Human Services:
PAGE2
The table below summarizes participation in Human Services activities for the month of February
2008:
Pro ram Number of Partici ants
Blood Pressure Screenin 30
Resource Libra 80
Commodities 388
Bereavement Su ort 5
Elder Law Private Counselin 22
HICAP 14
Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In" 14
Peo le with Arthritis Can Exercise 219
Sit and Be Fit 198
Upcoming Human Services activities are summarized below:
Pro ram/Activit Date Time
R.C. Annual Wellness Fair April 25, 2008 4:00 m - 8:00 m
Trips and Tours:
The table below summarizes participation in trips and tours for the month of February 2008:
Tri Date Number of Partici ants
The Gett Center Februa 6, 2008 41
"Wicked" Performance Februa 12, 2008 26
Golden Nu et Casino Februa 24-26, 2008 27
• Upcoming Trips and Tours activities are summarized below:
Tri Date
Broadwa and the Irish March 12, 2008
The Gett Villa March 13, 2008
Na a Valle March 30, 2008
Special Needs Programs:
The table below highlights some special needs activities that took place during February 2008.
Activit Start Date Number of Partici ants
Friday Night Fun Club -
Februa Sweetheart Dance February 8, 2008 28
G mnastics Janua 7, 2008 3
Star Performers Janua 9, 2008 35
Martial Arts - Be innin Janua 14, 2008 6
Martial Arts -Intermediate Janua 14, 2008 2
Upcoming Special Needs activities are summarized on the following page:
P125
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARCH 19, 2008
PnGE3
Activit Date Time
Frida Ni ht Fun Club -March Madness March 14, 2008 5:30 m - 7:30 m
Ballroom -Social Dance March 31, 2008 4:30 m - 5:20 m
Ballet - S ecial Needs Aril 3, 2008 3:00 m - 3:45 m
Movement and Tumblin - S. Needs Aril 3, 2008 4:00 m - 4:50 m
Ta - S ecial Needs Aril 3, 2008 5:00 m - 5:45 m
S ecial Needs Prom Ma 16, 2008 5:30 m - 9:00 m
Tech Junction:
The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for the month of February
2008:
Senior Computer Classes Date Number of Participants
Blo in Online Februa 19, 2008 14
E-mail and E-cards Februa 18, 2008 21
Introduction to Surfin the Net Februa 4, 2008 20
Introduction to Windows and PC Februa 1, 2008 20
Mana in Multimedia Februa 5, 2008 20
Tech Junction Date Number of Partici ants
Dro In-Use Month of Februa 819
• Upcoming Senior Computer and Contract Class activities are summarized below:
Senior Computer Classes Date Time
Introduction to Windows and PC's March 3,4,10,11 10:00 - 11:30 am
Introduction to Surfin the Internet March 17, 18, 24, 25 10:00 am - 11:30 am
Introduction to Power Point March 5, 6, 12, 13 1:00 pm - 2:30 pm
Introduction to Word Processing March 19, 20, 26, 27 1:00 pm -2:30 pm
Advance Power Point Workshop March 7, 14, 21, 28 1:00 pm - 2:30 pm
Contract Computer Classes Date Time
Intro to Typing and Microsoft Word March 27, 2008 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Microsoft Publisher Tools & Digital
Camera March 27, 2008 5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
Intro to Microsoft Word and Excel March 27, 2008 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm
Intro to Computer and Internet March 27, 2008 7:00 pm - 8:00 pm
• Upcoming Senior Computer and Contract Class activities are summarized below:
Senior Com uter Classes Date
Introduction to Windows and PCs March 3, 2008
Introduction to PowerPoint March 5, 2008
Advanced PowerPoint Workshop March 7, 2008
Introduction to Sung the Internet March 17, 2008
Introduction to Word Processing March 19, 2008
P126
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARCE319, 2008
Volunteers:
PAGE 4
The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the
month of January 2008.
Division January 2008
# of
# of Vols. Hours $ Value* July -January 2008
# of
# of Vols. Hours $ Value*
Administration 5 15 $296 35 105 $2,073
Senior Services 132 1,507 $29,748 1,113 12,669 $250,086
Human Services 31 98 $1,935 244 803 $15,851
S orts 123 1,494 $29,492 842 7,144 $141,023
S ecial Events 0 0 $0 345 647 $12,772
Performin Arts 86 754 $14,884 665 5,480 $108,175
Teens 27 148 $2,922 412 5,118 $101,029
Youth Pro rams 0 0 $0 10 386 $7,620
Totals 404 4,016 $79,276 3,666 32,352 $638,628
'8asetl on $ia. /4/Hour- Stale avefage as oelermineO me t,aurornla rnaepenoen[ aeaor
Youth:
• The table below summaries youth program attendance for the month of February 2008:
Program Classes/Sites Registrants/Attendance
Pla school 65/5 891/6,953
Lewis Partnership Kids Club @
Evergreen, & Terra Vista Apartments
4 sites
192
• "Fun on the Run"attendance for February 2008 was 230.
The table below provides the "Fun on the Run"schedule for winter/spring.
Teens:
Day of the Week Park Location Time
Frame
Monda Bear Gulch 2:30-5 m
Tuesda Hermosa 2:30-5 m
Wednesda Windrows 2:30-5 m
Thursda Ellena 2:30-5 m
Frida Old Town 2:30-5 m
• The table below summarizes Teen Program Attendance for the month of February.
Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation
Teen Center 606 Partici ants / 88.5 hrs
Teen Center, CSD Rental, Meetin s 48 Partici ants / 5 hrs
Teen Dance, S ecial Events 155 Participants/3 hrs
TRAC Meetin s, Snack Bars, S ecial Pro'ects 21 Volunteers / 35.5 hrs
P127
APPROVAL OF TIC COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARCI-I 19, 2008
PAGE 5
Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation
TRAC -Bab sittin 78 Partici ants / 11 Volunteers / 64.5 hrs
Teen Connection - S ecial Events 1 Volunteer/ 3.5 hrs.
Worksho s, Seminars 21 Partici ants, 66 hours
Youth Sports:
• The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity #
Partici ants Age/Gender #
Teams
Pee Wee Basketball 411 3-5/bo s & iris 48
Youth Basketball 706 7-15/bo s & irls 86
Youth Volle ball 190 8-14/bo s & iris 16
Northtown O en Pla 33 6-13/bo s & iris N/A
Northtown Cheerleadin Class 4 5-14/bo s & iris N/A
Northtown Hi -Ho 13 5-14/bo s & irls N/A
Northtown 3-on-3 Basketball 20 6-14/bo s & iris 4
CMS Youth Basketball Games 70 9-13 iris 8
CMS Youth Basketball Team Practices 584 7-13/bo s & iris 81
CMS Judo 42 7-12/bo s & irls N/A
RC Family Sports Center:
The table below provides drop-in/open play and rental participation at the Center for the
reporting period:
Activit #Partici ants
Adult Basketball 506
Youth Basketball 831
Adult Rac uetball 484
Youth Volle ball 3
Adult Wall ball 7
Youth Wall ball 30
Jazzercise 935
Rentals 540
Adult Sports:
• The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period:
Activit #Partici ants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,421 167 Males/Females
Tennis 12 N/A Males/Females
Basketball 260 379 Males
Rac uetball 14 N/A Males
Rac uetball 4 N/A Females
Northtown Hi Ho Aerobics 3 N/A Males/Females
There were two (2) adult softball tournaments during the month of February at the Epicenter and
Adult Sports Park. Two additional adult softball tournaments were cancelled due to the weather.
P128
APPROVAL OF Tf IE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARCH 19, 2008
Special Events:
PAGE 6
• On March 29'" the Department will be hosting its 2"' annual Job Fair at the Cultural Center.
Interviews will be conducted on-site for summer and year round part-time positions.
Staff is working with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation's Gala Subcommittee for
the upcoming 2008 Gala for the Arts that are scheduled for April 18`h at the Cultural Center.
Cultural and Performing Arts:
The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period:
Activit Partici ants/Attendance
Adult Choral Trou e 21
Teen Actors Boot Cam 28
Youth Theatre Worksho (agesll-15) 52
Sin in for a Lifetime 137
Broadwa Babies 151
Showsto ers 21
First Ste s: Introduction to Actin 42
Musical Theatre Worksho 58
Youth Theatre Worksho (ages 6-10) 106
Total 616
Community Theatre rehearsals included the following during the reporting period.
Activit Partici ants/Attendance
The Secret Garden 420
Rental Activities:
The table below and on the following page summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall at the
Cultural Center for the reporting period:
Celebration Hall Rental Events
Date Event Attendance
2/5/08 Public Pollin /Election Da 650
2/5/08 Tar et-Team Buildin Meetin 52
2/6/08 Cit of Rancho Cucamon a - Trainin 34
2/7/08 Association of Public Health -Meetin 168
2/8/08 Don Kurth for Ma or - Fundraisin Luncheon 189
2/9/08 Rancho S ecialt Hos ital - Holida Part 67
2/12/08 Dr. Zariff -Meetin 76
2/15/08 Cit of Rancho Cucamon a -Worksho 57
2/16/08 Private Part - 50 Birthda 78
2/19/08 Dr. Zariff-Business Conference 65
2/20/08 CREW -Inland Em ire - Networkin 54
2/20/08 Howe Barnes -Meetin 43
2/20/08 San Bernardino County -Behavioral Health -
Meetin
28
2/21/08 5 Linx -Seminar 120
P129
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MARC[-I 19, 2008
Celebration Hall Rental Events
Date Event Attendance
2/22/08 BNA Entertainment - Comed Show 142
2/23/08 Desi ner's Corner- Fashion Show 97
2/26/08 Dr. Zariff -Meetin 66
2/27/08 Chaffe Colle e - Leadershi Meetin 21
2/28/08 CB Richard Ellis -Awards Brunch 134
TOTAL 2,243
Lewis Family Playhouse:
During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Plavhouse was host to a wide variety of
productions, community programs and private rentals. The table below summarizes this
information for the reporting period:
PAGE 7
Lewis Family Playhouse Professionally Presented Productions
NUMBER OF
SHOW DATE Tickets Sold EVENT
Dreams of Anne Frank 2/1/08 and 2/2/08 837 3
We Tell Stories 2/6/08 252 1
Harlem Gos el Choir 2/9/08 872 2
Todd Oliver & the Funn Dos 2/10/08 759 2
Russian-American Kids Circus 2/16/08 690 2
Lewis Famil Pla house Communit Theatre Productions
SHOW
DATE
Tickets Sold' NUMBER OF
EVENT
The Secret Garden 2/29/08 230 1
The table above reflects number o/tickets sold for various performances during the reporting period. It does not reflect
actua/patronsin attendance.
Public Lobby:
• The Lobbv to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public seven days a week.
During the reporting period 1,310 visitors informally toured public areas of the facility.
Recreation Classes:
Registration for the spring session of recreation activities started on March 10~', and classes will
start on March 29`". Spring session is 10 weeks long and will end on June 6"', 2008. Three
hundred fifty-five (355) classes at 29 different sites throughout the City are being offered during
this timeframe.
P130
APPROVAL OF TIC COMMUIVITYSERVICESUFDATE REPORT
MARCH 19, 2008
Facilities:
PAGE 8
The table on the following page illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance
figures for our community facilities during the month of February 2008:
Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
Lions Center East 15/40 325 5,707
Lions Center West 40/122 1,423 3,596
James L. Brulte Senior Center 92/217 6,000 19,425
Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 102/234 9,950 12,765
Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Club,
Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted
Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming.
Parks:
The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for
the month of February 2008:
Park/Shelter Attendance/Partici ants # Rentals
Red Hill 839 18
Herita a 386 10
Milliken 135 5
Hermosa 70 3
Co ote Can on 0 0
Civic Center Court and 0 0
Am hitheatre Red Hill Park 0 0
TOTAL 1,430 36
Equestrian Rentals/Drop-in Use Participants: 120
S ectators: 0 8
Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of
assistance.
Epicenter Rentals/Activities:
Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming 2008 rentals and activities at the
Epicenter:
A licant Event Location Pro osed Date
MS Society Walk-a-thon Exterior streets surrounding April 5, 2008
the Epicenter, Parking Lot B
and grass area adjacent the
lot
Okoye Foundation Sports Clinic Adult Sports Fields at the May 11, 2008
E icenter
City/Community Playschool Graduation Epicenter Stadium May 22, 2008
Services
De artment
B-12 Pictures Commercial Filmin E icenter Stadium Ma 24, 2008
P131
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
MnRCH 19, 2008
PAGE 9
A licant Event Location Pro osed Date
Daily Bulletin All Star Game Epicenter Stadium June 10 & 12,
2008
Rancho Cucamonga 2008 Graduation Epicenter Stadium June 11, 2008
Hi h School
Pacific Coast All Star Games Epicenter Stadium June 22, 2008
Baseball
City/Community 4 of July Spectacular Epicenter Stadium July 4, 2008
Services
De artment
Pacific Coast Championship Games Epicenter Stadium August 24, 2008
Baseball
City/Community Founders Festival TBD October/November
Services 2008
De artment
The Public Works Division has scheduled major renovation projects for the Epicenter during the
timeframe of September 215` through December 2008.
Park and Recreation Commission:
• The Park and Recreation Commission's next meeting is scheduled for March 22, 2008. At this
meeting the items are agenized for discussion:
- Tour of the City of Fontana's Aquatics Facility.
- Discussion regarding the tour of the City of Fontana's Aquatics Facility.
- Discussion regarding parking at Heritage Park.
- Commission discussion regarding attendance at the California and Pacific Southwest
Recreation and Park Training Conference held February 26-29, 2008.
- Senior Advisory Committee update.
- Sports Advisory Committee update.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
The Community Foundation continues to work securing significant donations for the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center.
Two grants for funding were submitted during the reporting period; one to Bank of America and
the other to Target Stores.
• The Foundation continues to meet monthly through their various Committees and Sub-
committees: Executive Committee, the Membership/Nominating Sub-Committee, the Fund
Development Sub-Committee and the Finance Sub-Committee.
The next Community Foundation's board meeting is their annual meeting which is scheduled for
Wednesday, June 11, 2008.
Community Services Director
STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008 RANCHO
C;UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director
By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) FOR A WAIVER OF FEES FOR USE OF THE
EPICENTER SPECIAL EVENT AREA ON FRIDAY, MAY 9T" AND SATURDAY, MAY
10T", 2008, TO CONDUCT THEIR ELECTRIC IAWN MOWER EXCHANGE EVENT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the CitM Council approve the use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on Friday,
May 9`"and Saturday, May 10 by South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for their
Electric Lawn Mower Exchange Event and waive associated rental fees.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a request from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) to hold
their Electric Lawn Mower Exchange event at the Epicenter again this year. AQMD is proposing to move
onto the site on Friday, May 9`h for set up, so the trailers of new mowers and dumpsters that will receive
the old mowers can be setup in advance. AQMD will provide private security overnight at the site to
safeguard their equipment and supplies. The actual event will be open to the public (participants must
be able to show proof of residence in AQMD's service area --all of Orange County, and major portions
of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside counties) on Saturday, May 10`h from 8:00 am until 12-
noon. AQMD will clean up the site and move out their equipment by 3:00 pm. This year participants are
required to pre-register to take advantage of this opportunity. Last year, 579 residents of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and surrounding communities exchanged their operable, gasoline-powered lawn
mowers for a zero emission cordless electric lawn mower that was provided by the AQMD for the cost of
$100.00. The price will remain the same for this year's event.
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the fees associated with the proposed Electric Lawn
Mower event hosted by AQMD, as this event will help residents "clean the air that we breathe'.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of rental fees associated with this event is $2,000. AQMD
would still be required to provide evidence of liability insurance as well as an additional endorsement
naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured for the event.
P132
Kevin IV7"¢Ardle
Community Services Director 11COMMSERN000ncABBOartlslCityDounc]IStallReports120081Warver.AOM0.3.19.OB.tloc
STAFF REPORT
COMMUI`RTY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE PACIFIC
ELECTRIC TRAIL FOR USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND MARKETING
SUPPORT FOR THEIR BIKE-A-THON TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2008
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from the Friends of the Pacific
Electric Trail, anon-profit group, to use City equipment and receive marketing support for
their Bike-A-Thon event to be held on May 10, 2008.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a written request from the Friends of the Pacific Trail to assist with
equipment and marketing for their 3`d Annual Bike-A-Thon. The event begins at Central
Park, on the trail, and includes a family ride and 25 mile fun ride, along with various
sponsor booths. The group is requesting marketing exposure and equipment for this event
that raises funds for the Pacific Electric Trail.
Marketing exposure includes the ability to place flyers at City community centers, a mention
on the City/Community Services Department website, and a listing on Channel 3. They had
also requested a mention in the Grapevine and the ability to hang a street banner, but
these requests were received too late to accommodate them. Equipment needs include
canopies, tables, chairs and a small PA system. They also request two-three staff members
for set up and clean up.
Staff recommends that City Council approve the request to provide the above items for the
event.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the City for staff support: Approximately $150.
Res ttully su miffed,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
P133
Attachment
I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&BoardslCityCouncillStaf/Report5120081PET bikeathon request.3.19.08.doc
P134
~~~Q~C1FiC 8~~~~~
a CIFj ~~
a P:.._.,~, a
I'o ti ~'^_~,1 ~
February 20, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mr. Kevin McArdle
Director of Community Services
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
RE: Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail 3rd Annual Bike-a-thon
Dear Mr. McArdle,
We are requesting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga co-sponsors our 3rd
annual bike-n-thou this year. We are looking forward to your participation
and working with your department to achieve a successful event. We are
especially delighted that this year, as we are able to incorporate the newly
opened section of the trail, beginning at Central Park. The areas that we
need the most assistance in fall under the category of equipment and
marketing exposure from the City.
Marketing Exposure:
1. We would like a mention in the City/Community Services Website,
(RCPARK.COM),
2. Mention in the newsletter
3. The ability to distribute flyers at City community centers
4. Hang a city banner, (possibly next year).
5. A mention in the Grapevine, (next year)
6. Mention on the City's Channel 3
7. Assistance with contacting Charter TV to inquire about possibly
filming this event.
P135
Equipment Requests:
1. 15-20 E-Z Up canopies (10x10)
2. Tables (25)
3. Chairs (50)
4. Small PA system
5. Staffing support (2-3), as we will also have volunteers to assist in
set-up.
Thnnk you for your interest in this most important activity. Plense contact
me with your ideas of how we can work together to make this the most
successful event ever! I can be reached at 909.921.1059 and my email
nddress is: vickygoodwinl@hotmail.com. Thank you in advnnce for your
time and interest in this worthy event.
Sincerely,
Friends of Rails o Trails
Victoria Jones, Vice President
Vick~goodwinl@hotmail.com
909.944.1046
cc: Diane Williams
Stephen Yang, Bike-a-thon Chnirman
StaffReport
DATE: March 19. 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND
CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING
OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 21, 2008, TO LEVY THE
ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009
FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public
Hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for the Park and Recreation
Improvement District (PD-85). It is recommended that there be no increase in
assessment rates in this district for Fiscal Year 2008/2009. The Engineer's Reports are
on file in the City Clerk's Office.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance
the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage
Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre
facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill
Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road
and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the
Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARKAND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85
March 19, 2008
Page 2
Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must
adopt resolutions giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to
levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the
assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2008/2009.
Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule:
Definition
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Less than 1.50 acres
1.51 acres to 3.50 acres
3.51 acres to 7.00 acres
7.01 acres to 14.00 acres
14.01 acres to 25.00 acres
25.01 acres and Larger
Respectfully submitted,
Deputy City Manager/Community Development
MA: ED
Assessment oer Parcel
$31.00
$31.00
$15.50
$46.50
$108.50
$217.00
$434.00
$775.00
P137
Attachments
P138
RESOLUTION NO. O ~-C~1O2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORAPPROVAL OF
CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND
RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO
INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve
that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City
Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in
writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the
maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District
(PD-85); and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a
report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this
Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every
part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said
report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby order as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work
and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said
report be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in
said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment
District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by
said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses
thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal
year 2008/2009 for the subsequent proceedings.
P139
RESOLUTION NO. D S- D~3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
PARKAND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows:
Description of Work
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention
of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement
District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2008/2009 for the maintenance and operation and debt
service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon
dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the
boundaries of said district. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision
of landscape maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any
improvement) in connection with said district.
Location of Work
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill
Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer
and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment
Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)."
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of
more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the
expense of the work chargeable upon the district, which said district is assessed to pay the
costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior
boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District
(PD-85)", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said
assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City.
Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description
of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the
extent of said assessment district.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT (PD-85)
March 19, 2008
Page 2
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved
the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed
assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment.
The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said
City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of
the assessments and for the extent of the work.
Time and Place of Hearing
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the
Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, 91730.
WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M.
Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the
existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or
why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2008/2009. Protests
must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof
is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said
City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be
considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll,
such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the
owner of the property so described.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the
Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the
same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for
the hearing, at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
P140
P141
Staff Report
DATE: March 19, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING
THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR
MAY 21, 2008, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2008/2009 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE
IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the
Public Hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no
increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2008/2009. The
Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Below is an itemized analysis on adistrict-by-district basis. To summarize, the
assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended
to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the
actual costs of the districts. In the past, any available prior year carryover has been
used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements.
This policy continues for FY 2008/2009 and will allow the assessment rates to remain
unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports,
identifies proposed FY 2008/2009 rates that are recommended to remain the same as
FY 2007/2008 rates.
The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
March 19, 2008
Page 2
Assessment Rate
Street Lighting Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit
SLMD # 1 -Arterial $17.77
SLMD # 2 -General City Local $39.97
SLMD # 3 -Victoria Planned Community $47.15
SLMD # 4 -Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96
SLMD # 5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60
SLMD # 6 -Commercial/Industrial $51.50
SLMD # 7 -North Etiwanda $33.32
SLMD # 8 -South Etiwanda $193.75`
"This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate
number of streetlights to assessment units.
Ily submitted,
~luzri
City Manager/Community Development
MATED
P142
Attachments
P143
RESOLUTION NO. O g- Olv
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF
CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City
Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report
in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the
maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said
City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to
this Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said reports and each and
every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and
that said reports, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby order as follows:
That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work
and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said
reports be hereby approved and confirmed.
2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described
in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said
Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by
said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses
thereof, as contained in said reports are hereby approved and confirmed.
4. That said reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for the
fiscal year 2008/2009 for the subsequent proceedings.
P144
RESOLUTION NO. Q D' Q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVYAND COLLECTASSESSMENTSWITHIN
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows:
Description of Work
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the
intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 2008/2009 for the
maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon
dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the
boundaries of said districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and
supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or
any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection
with said districts.
Location of Work
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway
rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the reports of the City Engineer and described
on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8."
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of
more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the
expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay
the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior
boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No.
1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7" and "Map of Street Lighting
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
March 19, 2008
Page 2
Maintenance District No. 8" indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory
included within said assessment districts and which maps are on file in the office of the City
Clerk of said City.
Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular
description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all
details as to the extent of said assessment districts.
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No.
approved the annual reports of the City Engineer, which reports indicates the amount of
the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of
assessment. The reports titled "Annual Engineer's Report" are on file in the office of the
City Clerk of said City. Reference to said reports is hereby made for all particulars for the
amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work.
Time and Ptace of Hearing
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in
the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, 91730.
WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M.
Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for
the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried
out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2008/2009.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the
Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to
the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date
set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
P145
P146
R A N C fl O C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE: March 19, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING
THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR
MAY 21, 2008, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2008/2009 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,
2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the
Public Hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape
Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. It is recommended that
there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year
200812009. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS:
It is recommended that the assessment rates remain at existing levels for all Landscape
Maintenance District for FY 2008/2009. Staff is researching the possibility of amending
the rates in LMD's 6, 7, 8 to cover the rising costs of energy and water. Any changes to
these rates would not be implemented until sometime in fiscal year 2009/2010. The
following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY
2008/2009 rates:
Assessment Rate
Landscape Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit
LMD # 1 -General City $ 92.21
LMD # 2 -Victoria Planned Community $422.00
LMD # 3A -Hyssop $413.74
LMD # 36 -Commerical/Industrial $352.80
LMD # 4 -Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
March 19, 2008
Page 2
LMD # 5 -Tot Lot
LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community
LMD # 7 -North Etiwanda
LMD # 8 -South Etiwanda
LMD # 9 -Lower Etiwanda
LMD # 10 -Rancho Etiwanda
submitted,
Mah~ii Aluzri
Dep y City Manager- Community Development Department
MATED
Attachment
$113.29
$246.97
$307.05
$151.45
$387.94
$616.20
P147
-2-
P148
RESOLUTION NO. O g'D~lo
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City
Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report
in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the
maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2,
3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said
City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been
presented to this Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and
every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and
that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby order as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work
and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report
be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described
in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said
Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by
said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses
thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal
year 2008/2009 for the subsequent proceedings.
P149
RESOLUTION NO. O ~~ d~ 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows:
Description of Work
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of
this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,
2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for the fiscal year 2008/2009 for the maintenance and operation
of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by
deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said
maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance
(including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for
illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts.
Location of Work
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-
way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly
described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams
Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10."
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more
than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the
work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and
expenses thereof,_and which districts are described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior
boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map
of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4",
"Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6",
"Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8",
"Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
March 19, 2008
Page 2
No. 10", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each
assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City.
Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of
said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent
of said assessment districts.
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the
annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed
assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The
report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City.
Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the
assessments and for the extent of the work.
Time and Place of Hearing
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the
Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, 91730.
WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M.
Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the
existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out orwhy
assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 200812009.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the
Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the
same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for
the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
P150
STAFF REPORT
Engineering Deparhnent
DATE: March 19, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Acting City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
P151
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
(DRA-37) FOR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16141,
LOCATED SOUTH OF 9TH STREET, EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY HC VINEYARD LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving an amendment to
Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) for Storm Drain Improvements for Parcel Map 16141, and
authorizing the Mayor to sign said amendment and the City Clerk to record the same.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
A Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) was approved by the City Council on December 5, 2007,
and recorded on December 18, 2007, as Document No. 2007-0702031 in the office of the County
Recorded, San Bernardino County, California. The agreement was for the future reimbursement
from property owners for construction of the 9th Street storm drain and related improvements. This
is a developer to developer reimbursement, City funds are not impacted.
For clarifcation purposes, Area 3 of Exhibit "A" for DRA-37 should be exempted from paying any
fees from the ReimbursementAgreement since they are part of Parcel Map 16141 that was required
to install the storm drain project. Area 3 consists of 11 parcels of Parcel Map 16141 and is also
identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 207-272-79 thru 89. The original calculated reimbursement
fees for all other assessed parcels will not be changed.
A copy of the recorded Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) identified as Document Number
2007-0701031 has been attached for reference.
Respectfully submitted,
Mahdi
G D1D9S10
DEPARTMENT
Manager/Community Development
MA: W B/rlc
`r
1 i
f
CITY OF
J RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGWEERING DIVISION
, ~ ~ _t
P152
~~' 37 N
ITEM:, /~~RrF/ M~ /6/.~/
TITLE: ~LL['~/V/T"'y /N1eD
P153
RESOLUTION NO. O S' ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (DRA-37) FOR STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS FROM HC VINEYARD LLC.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution
No. 87-284 on December 5, 2007, accepting a Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) from HC
Vineyard LLC; and
WHEREAS, said Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) was recorded in Official
Records of San Bernardino County, California on December 18, 2007 as Document No. 2007-
0702031; and
WHEREAS, any fees related to Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) shall not apply
to parcels 1 thru 11 of Parcel Map 16141 and also identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 207-
071-79 thru 89; and
WHEREAS, the original calculated reimbursement fees for Assessor Parcel
Numbers 207-262-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19, 21, 24, 28, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 52, 53,
58, and 207-731-65 are not being modified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, does hereby approve said amendment to Reimbursement Agreement
(DRA-37) for Assessor Parcel Numbers 207-027-79 thru 89 and that the City Clerk shall cause
said amendment to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
P154
STAFF REPORT ~ _
ENGINEERING DEPARTIv1ENT
RANCHO
Date: March 19, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer ~~r{/
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,135,980.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, MIKE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $313,598.00 FOR
THE BERYL STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO SUNFLOWER STREET, TO BE
FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11123035650/1505112-0 AND
MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1505176-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $3,135,980.00 to the apparent low bidder, Mike Bubalo
Construction Company, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$313,598.00, for the Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta
Loma Drive to Sunflower Street, to be funded from Drainage Funds, Account No.
11123035650/1505112-0 and Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1505176-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 4, 2008, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $4,040,580.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities
to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to
Sunflower Street scope of work consists of installing master planned storm drain with pertinent
manholes, laterals and catch basins, relocating interfering water and sewer facilities; installing
handicap ramp, concrete curb and gutter, cold milling and pavement overlaying, including
rehabilitation; replacing rockscape, landscape and irrigation in kind; adjusting utilities to grade; and,
re-striping, including pavement markings. The contract documents call for one hundred twenty (120)
working days to complete this construction.
Mahdi luzri
Deput City Manager/Community Development
MA/RD/SH:is
Attachment
P155
BERYL STREET STORM DRAIN AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO SUNFLOIVER STREET
srra
4,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
VICINITY MAP
N
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation Irom
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street
ENGINEERS COST
ESTIMATE APPARENT LOW BLP~ 56
Mike Bubalo Construction
Ca., Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Clear and Grub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $65,000.00 1 $65,000.00 $45,000.00 1 $45,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $600.00 1 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement prepazation & routing $100.00 1 $140,000.00 $100.00 1 $140,000.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $3.00 1 $14,880.00 $3.00 1 $14,880.00
5. 15 EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $350.00 $5,250.00 $800.00 $12,000.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $200.00 $2,000.00 $300.00 1 $3,000.00
7. 550 TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $85.00 $46,750.00 $120.00 1 $66,000.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $45.00 $35,100.00 $50.00 1 $39,000.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin V.%=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $23,000.00 1 $207,000.00 $18,000.00 $162,000.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=2]', incl. local depression, complete in place $18,000.00 1 $396,000.00 $15,000.00 $33Q,000.00
11. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
12. 17 EA junction Stmcture No. 2 $12,000.00 1 $204,000.00 $3,000.00 1 $51,000.00
13. 6 EA ManholeNo.2 $15,000.00 $90,000.00 $8,000.00 $48,000.00
14. 1 EA Manhole No.4 $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $14,000.001 $14,000.00
15. 1 L$ Remove & replace in kind rockscape, imgation & landscape after cons[. of
CB &laterals $30,000.001 $30,000.00 $25,000.001 $25,000.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $$,000.001 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000,00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $45.001 $28,800.00 $30.00 $19,200.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $12.00 $16,800.00 $6.001 $8,400.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $6.00 $20,400.00 $6.001 $20,400.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8"PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $800.001 $6,400.00 $300.001 $2,400.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $65,000.001 $65,000.00 $35,000.001 $35,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90"RCP(1800D) $600.00 $1,718,400.00 $450.001 $1,288,800.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP(ISOOD) $500.00 $481,500.00 $400.001 $385,200.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP (15000) $300.001 $234,600.00 $200.00 $156,400.00
25. 403 LF 24" RCP (20000) $200.001 $80,600.00 $200.001 $80,600.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $5,000.001 $15,000.00 $800.00 $2,400.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $500.001 $10,500.00 $900.00 $18,900.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.001 $2,000.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $500.00 $6,000.00 $500.001 $6,000.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $10,000.001 $20,000.00 $1,650.001 $3,300.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition StructureNo.lperStd334 $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $14,000.001 $14,000.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' & 6' water, replace B' VCP to 8" DIP sewer, install blow-off, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $45,000.001 $45,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist.tltilitiescrossingproposedstormdrainpdorfoexcavation $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $35,000.001 $35,000.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $1,000.001 $2,000.00 $800.001 $1,600.00
36. 1 LS TraffcSigning,SMpingBPavementMarkings,perplan,completeinplace $11,400.00 $11,400.00 $8,000.001 $8,000.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $15,000.001 $15,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
TOTAL 1 $4,099,580.00 $3,135,980.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #2
Southern California
Pipeline Const. Inc. #3 P157
Ken Thompson, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. 1 LS Clear and Grub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $17$,000.00 1 $17$,000.00 $47,000.001 $47,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,$00.00 1 $3,000.00 $87$.001 $1,7$0.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $10$.00 1 $147,000.00 $10$.001 $147,000.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $1.$$ I $7,688.00 $$.001 $24,800.00
$. 1$ EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $7$0.00 1 $11,2$0.00 $410.001 $6,1$0.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve 8 cover to finish grade $$00.00 1 $$,000.00 $264.001 $2,640.00
7. $$0 TOA'S AC Pavement, incl. pavement prepazation. Section "A" $11$.001 $63,2$0.00 $117.001 $64,3$0.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $40.00 1 $31,200.00 $63.001 $49,140.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin W=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $13,000.00 1 $ 117,000.00 $12,700.001 $114,300.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=2I', incl. local depression, complete in place $9,800.00 1 $215,600.00 $9,400.001 $206,800.00
11. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $9,000.001 $9,000.00 $8,800.001 $8,800.00
12. 17 EA Junction Structure No. 2 $2,000.001 $34,000.00 $1,800.001 $30,600.00
13. 6 EA Manhole No. 2 $9,000.001 $$4,000.00 $8,200.001 $49,200.00
14. 1 EA Manhole No.4 $14,$00.001 $14,$00.00 $13,800.00 $13,800.00
15. 1 LS Remove & replace in kind rockscape, imgation & landscape after const. of
CB & laterals $1$,000.001 $1$,000.00 $17,500.001 $17,$00.00
16. 1 LS Sawcu[ exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $2,$00.001 $2,$00.00 $3,500.001 $3,$00.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $3$.00 $22,400.00 $31.001 $19,840.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $6.001 $8,400.00 $6.501 $9,100.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $$.001 $17,000.00 $4.90 $16,660.00
20. $ LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8" PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $1,$00.001 $12,000.00 $4$0.001 $3,600.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $50,000.001 $50,000.00 $295.001 $29$.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (ISOOD) $44$.001 $1,274,480.00 $563.001 $1,612,432.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP(1500D) $400.001 $38$,200.00 $461.001 $443,943.00
24. 782 LF 36"RCP(1500D) $280.001 $218,960.00 $166.$01 $130,203.00
2$. 403 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $240.001 $96,720.00 $14$.001 $$8,43$.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $1,$00.001 $4,$00.00 $1,400.001 $4,200.00
27. 21 EA Consttuct support for conduits across ttenches per Std 339 $$00.001 $10,$00.00 $1,300.001 $27,300.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $7,$00.001 $7,$00.00 $468.001 $468.00
29. 12 EA Constrict concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $1,500.001 $18,000.00 $900.001 $1Q800.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $13,000.001 $26,000.00 $2,340.001 $4,680.00
31. I EA Construct Transition Structure No. 1 per Std 334 $10,$00.001 $10,$00.00 $6,43$.001 $6,43$.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $2,92$.001 $2,92$.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' 8 8' water, replace e" vCP to e' DIP sewer, install blow-oH, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $g$,000.OO $8$,000.00 $18,135.001 $18,13$.00
34. 1 LS Pothole allexisLUtilitiescrossingproposedstormdrainpdortoexcavation $1$,000.001 $1$,000.00 $22,000.001 $22,000.00
3$. 2 EA Install construction signs $2,000.001 $4,000.00 $819.001 $1,638.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Stdping 8 Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $8,000.001 $8,000.00 $4,100.001 $4,100.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $1$,000.001 $1$,000.00 $29,2$0.001 $29,2$0.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $1$,000.001 $15,000.00 $8,800.001 $8,800.00
TOTAL 1 $3,212,]48.00 1 $3,222,569.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #4
C.P. Construction Co., Inc. #5 F'15fi
Riverside Const. Co., Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Clear and Grub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $235,000.00 1 $235,000.00 $240,000.00 1 $24Q,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $500.00 1 $1,000.00 $2,050.00 1 $4,100.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $110.00 1 $154,000.00 $97.50 1 $136,500.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $2.75 1 $13,640.00 $2.00 1 $9,920.00
5. 15 EA Adjust manhole tmme and cover to finish grade $450.00 1 $6,750.00 $850.00 1 $12,750.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $75.00 1 $750.00 $600.001 $6,000.00
7. SSO TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $110.00 $60,500.00 $88.001 $48,400.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $99.00 $77,220.00 $65.001 $50,700.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin W=26', incl. local depression, complete in place $14,300.00 1 $128,700.00 $12,000.001 $108,000.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=21', incl. local depression, complete in place $10,500.00 $231,000.00 $9,000.001 $198,000.00
1 L 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $10,500.00 1 $10,500.00 $8,100.001 $8,100.00
12. 17 EA Junction StructureNo.2 $950.00 1 $16,150.00 $1,350.001 $22,950.00
13. 6 EA ManholeNo.2 $10,500.00 1 $63,000.00 $7,600.001 $45,600.00
14. I EA ManholeNo.4 $14,500.001 $14,500.00 $13,000.001 $13,000.00
15. 1 LS Remove & replace in kind rockscape, imgation 8. landscape after const. of
CB & Iatemis $35,000.001 $35,000.00 $15,500.001 $15,$00.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $650.001 $650.00 $4,000.001 $4,000.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist $16.501 $10,560.00 $24.001 $15,360,00
I8. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $8.001 $11,200.00 $6.001 $8,400.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $4.251 $14,450.00 $8.001 $27,200.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8" PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $25,001 $200.00 $1,000.001 $8,000.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $20Q,000.00 $200,000.00 $85,000.001 $85,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (ISOOD) $470.001 $1,346,080.00 $445.001 $1,274,480.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (t500D) $320.001 $308,160.00 $360.00 $346,680.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP(ISOOD) $145.001 $113,390.00 $230.001 $179,860.00
25. 403 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $109.001 $43,927.00 $190.001 $76,570.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $2,000.001 $6,000.00 $2,200.001 $6,600.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $750.001 $15,750.00 $1,500.001 $31,500.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $750.001 $750.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $500.001 $6,000.00 $1,000.00) $12,000.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $1,500.001 $3,000.00 $6,800.00) $13,600.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition Structure No. 1 per Std 334 $19,750.001 $19,750.00 $5,500.001 $5,500.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $950.001 $950.00 $65,000.001 $65,000.00
33. I LS Relocate exist. 6' & e' water, replace 8' VCP to e' DIP sewer, install blow-oft, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $20,000.001 $20,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist. Utilities crossing proposed stone drain priorto excavation $15,000.001 $15,000.00 $25,000.001 $25,000.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $500.001 $1,000.00 $1,500.001 $3,000.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Striping & Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $7,250.00 $7,250.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $37,000.001 $37,000.00
TOTAL 1 $3,251,777.00 1 $3,277,270.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #6
pacific States Engineering #7 F'1 by
H & H General
Contractors, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Cleaz and Grub, incl. removal, tmclass excav/fill & disposal $69,000.00 1 $69,000.00 $170,000.00 1 $170,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,500.00 1 $3,000.00 $2,400.00 1 $4,800.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $90.00 1 $126,000.00 $116.00 1 $162,400.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $1.40 1 $6,944.00 $2.00 1 $9,920.00
S. 15 EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $300.00 1 $4,500.00 $1,200.00 1 $18,000.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $175.00 1 $1,750.00 $277.50 1 $2,775.00
7. SSO TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $82.00 1 $45,100.00 $223.50 1 $122,925.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $78.00 1 $60,840.00 $47.00 1 $36,660.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin w=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $11,700.00 $105,300.00 $12,500.00 $112,500.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=21', incl. local depression, complete in place $8,800.00 $193,600.00 $11,300.00 $248,600.00
11. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $8,050.00 1 $8,050.00 $13,560.00 1 $13,560.00
12. 17 EA Junction Structure No. 2 $2,800.00 1 $47,600.00 $1,525.00 $25,925.00
13. 6 EA Manhole No. 2 $8,900.001 $53,400.00 $7,760.00 1 $46,560.00
14. 1 EA ManholeNo.4 $14,300.001 $14,300.00 $18,600.001 $18,600.00
15. 1 LS Remove & replace in kind rockscape, irrigation & landscape aRer const. of
CB & laterals $28 500.001 $28,500.00 $18,600.001 $18,600.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $6,480.001 $6,480.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $27.001 $17,280.00 $28.001 $17,920.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $44.001 $61,600.00 $30.001 $42,000.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $4.201 $14,280.00 $4.501 $15,300.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8"PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $110.001 $$$0.00 $675.001 $$,400.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $75,000.001 $75,000.00 $30,000.001 $30,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (1800D) $544.001 $1,558,016.00 $470.00 $1,346,080.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (ISOOD) $497.001 $478,611.00 $406.00 $390,978.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP (ISOOD) $104.001 $81,328.00 $238.00 $186,116.00
25. 403 LF 24" RCP(2000D) $78.001 $31,434.00 $234.001 $94,302.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $2,950.001 $8,850.00 $3,120.001 $9,360.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $3,075.001 $64,575.00 $360.001 $7,560.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-3G' RCP pipes with mortar and brick $2,200.001 $2,200.00 $2,400.001 $2,400.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $1,150.001 $13,800.00 $480.001 $5,760.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $7,000.001 $14,000.00 $1,800.001 $3,600.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition Structure No. ]per Std 334 $11,000.001 $11,000.00 $23,760.001 $23,760.00
32. I EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $4,400.001 $4,400.00
33. 1 LS Relorate exist. 6' & e' water, replace e' VCP to e' DIP sewer, install blow-oft, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $125,000.001 $125,000.00 $120,000.00 $120,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist_Utilitiescrossingproposedstormdrainpdortoexcavation $28,000.001 $28,000.00 $16,560.001 $16,560.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $400.001 $800.00 $1,080.001 $2,160.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, SMping 8 Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $6,600.001 $6,600.00 $7,320.001 $7,320.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $61,200.001 $61,200.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $58,000.001 $58,000.00
TOTAL 1 $3,400,138.00 1 $3,468,481.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #8
Trautwein Const. #9 P~ 60
Bonadiman-McCain, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
l . 1 LS Cleaz and Grvb, incl. removal, tmclass excav/fill & disposal $100,000.00 1 $100,000.00 $2Q,000.00 $20,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,100.00 1 $4,200.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $95.00 1 $133,000.00 $100.00 1 $140,000.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $1.35 1 $6,696.00 $2.00 1 $9,920.00
5. 15 EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $300.00 1 $4,500.00 $500.00 1 $7,500.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $100.00 1 $1,000.00 $150.00 1 $1,500.00
7. 550 TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $100.00 1 $55,000.00 $142.00 1 $78,100.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $22.00 ) $17,160.00 $150.00 1 $117,000.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin W=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $18,000.00 1 $162,000.00 $13,900.00 1 $125,100.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=21', incl. local depression, complete in place $16,000.00 1 $352,000.00 $12,000.00 1 $264,000.00
1 I. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00
12. 17 EA Junction StructureNo.2 $1,800.00 1 $30,600.00 $1,800.00 1 $30,600.00
13. 6 EA ManholeNo.2 $11,000.00 1 $66,000.00 $5,800.00 1 $34,800.00
14. I EA ManholeNo.4 $23,000.00 1 $23,000.00 $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00
15. I L$ Remove & replace in kind rockscape, irrigation & landscape after cons[. of
CB & laterals $4,000.00 1 $4,000.00 $14,000.00 1 $14,000.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $2,500.001 $2,500.00 $6,000.00 1 $6,000.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $25.001 $16,000.00 $37.00 1 $23,680.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $16.001 $22,400.00 $27.00 $37,800.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $6.001 $20,400.00 $6.001 $20,400.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8"PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $600.001 $4,$00,00 $800.001 $6,400.00
21. I LS Bracing or Shoring $100,000.001 $]00,000.00 $lOQ,000.00 $100,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP(ISOOD) $498.001 $1,426,272.00 $569.001 $1,629,616.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (1500D) $460.001 $442,980.00 $440.00 $423,720.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP (1500D) $310.001 $242,420.00 $212.001 $165,784.00
25. 403 LF 24"RCP(2000D) $260.001 $104,780.00 $176.001 $70,928.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $4,000.001 $12,000.00 $1,500.001 $4,500.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $1,000.001 $21,000.00 $1,000.001 $21,000.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $1,500.001 $1,500.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $200.001 $2,400.00 $500.00 $6,000.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $1,000.001 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
31. I EA Construct Transition Structure No. 1 per Std 334 $15,000.001 $15,000.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $2,500.001 $2,500.00 $4,500.001 $4,500.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' & 8' water replace 8' VCP to 8' DIP sewer, install blow-0R, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $40,000.001 $40,000.00 $52,000.001 $52,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist. Utilities crossing proposed storm drain prior to excavation $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $800.001 $1,600.00
36. 1 LS TreKc Signing, Striping & Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $8,000.001 $8,000.00 $6,000.001 $6,000.00
37. 1 LS TratTicControl $15,000.001 $15,000.00 $77,000.001 $77,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $10,000.001 $10,000.00
TOTAL 1 $3,500,908.00 1 $3,551,648.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #10
Norstar Plumbing and
Engineering, Inc. #11 P~ 67
Steve Bubalo Const. Co.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Clear and Gtub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $6QOOO.OO I $60,000.00 $150,000.00 1 $150,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,250.00 1 $2,500.00 $1,SOO.OO I $3,000.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $100.00 1 $]40,000.00 $100.00 1 $140,000.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $3.00 1 $14,880.00 $2.00 1 $9,920.00
S. 1 S EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $750.00 1 $11,250.00 $600.00 1 $9,000.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $250.00 1 $2,500.00 $400.00 1 $4,000.00
7. S50 TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $125.00 1 $68,750.00 $100.00 1 $SS,000.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $35.00 1 $27,300.00 $50.00 1 $39,000.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin w=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $15,000.00 1 $135,000.00 $16,500.00 1 $148,500.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=21', incl. local depression, complete in place $12,000.00 1 $264,000.00 $13,000.00 1 $286,000.00
I1. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 1 $12,000.00
12. 17 EA Junction Structure No. 2 $4,000.00 1 $68,000.00 $7,000.00 1 $119,000.00
13. 6 EA Manhole No. 2 $8,000.00 1 $48,000.00 $7,800.00 $46,800.00
14. 1 EA Manhole No. 4 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 S. I I,$ Remove & replace in kind rockscape, irrigation & landscape after const. of
CB & laterals $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect [o new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $32.00 $20,480.00 $45.00 $28,800.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $18.001 $25,200.00 $30.00 $42,000.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $5.00 $17,000.00 $7.00 1 $23,800.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8" PvC bleeder & install 36" RCP $2,000.00 $16,000.00 $400.001 $3,200.00
21. I LS Bracing or Shoring $80,000.001 $80,000.00 $150,000.001 $150,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90"RCP(1800D) $600.001 $1,718,400.00 $527.001 $1,509,328.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (t500D) $360.001 $346,680.00 $380.001 $365,940.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP (1500D) $225.001 $17S,9S0.00 $300.001 $234,600.00
2S. 403 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $200.001 $80,600.00 $250.001 $100,750.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collaz per APWA S[d Dwg No. 380-3 $6,000.001 $18,000.00 $3,000.001 $9,000.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $1,800.001 $37,800.00 $800.001 $16,800.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-3G" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $7SO.OOI $750.00 $1,200.001 $1,200.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $1,800.001 $21,600.00 $500.001 $6,000.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $7,000.001 $14,000.00 $1,200.001 $2,400.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition Structure No. ]per Std 334 $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $8,000.001 $8,000.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $3,500.001 $3,500.00 $2,000.001 $2,000.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' & B' water, replace 8' VCP to 8' DIP sewer, install blow-0ft, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan 840,000.001 $40,000.00 $48,000.001 $45,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole allexisLUtilitiescrossingproposedstonndminpdortoexcavation $1Q000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.001 $10,000.00
3S. 2 EA Install construction signs $2,000.001 $4,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
36. 1 LS TraffcSigning,Striping&PavementMarkings, per plan, complete in place $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $5,000.00 $5,000.00 81Q,000.00 $10,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.001 $2,500.00
TOTAL 1 $3,569,140.00 $3,640,038.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #12
Metro Builders &
Engineers Group, Inc. #13 P162
-Albert W. Davies, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Clear and Grub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $41,300.001 $41,300.00 $80,000.00 1 $80,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,180.00 1 $2,360.00 $600.00 1 $1,200.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $132.16 1 $185,024.00 $106.00 1 $148,400.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $2.08 $10,316.80 $2.00 1 $9,920.00
5. IS EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $413.00 $6,195.00 $570.00 1 $8,550.00
6. ] 0 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $295.001 $2,950.00 $380.00 1 $3,800.00
7. 550 TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $101.481 $55,814.00 $126.00 1 $69,300.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $21.24 $16,567.20 $70.00 1 $54,600.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin w=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $11,328.00 1 $101,952.00 $25,200.00 1 $226,800.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=2]', incl. local depression, complete in place $9,558.00 1 $210,276.00 $20,800.00 1 $457,600.00
11. 1 EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $8,260.00 $8,260.00 $16,600.00 1 $16,600.00
12. 17 EA Junction StructureNo.2 $1,593.00 $27,081.00 $4,100.00 1 $69,700.00
13. 6 EA Manho]eNo.2 $10,431.20 1 $62,587.20 $9,900.00 1 $59,400.00
14. 1 EA Manho]eNo.4 $2Q,644.10 $20,644.10 $12,100.00 1 $12,100.00
15. 1 LS Remove & replace in kind rockscape, imgation & landscape after const. of
CB &taterals $21,830.00 $21,830.00 $20,000.00 1 $20,000.00
16. I LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect [o new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $885.001 $$$5.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $35.40 $22,656.00 $35.00 1 $22,400.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $14.751 $20,650.00 $21.00 1 $29,400.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $11.80 1 $40,120.00 $5.00 1 $17,000.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8" PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $6,490.001 $51,920.00 $$00.00 1 $6,400.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $295,000.001 $295,000.00 $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (1800D) $558.94 1$1,600,804.]6 $500.00 1$1,432,000.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (1500D) $399.29 1 $384,516.27 $418.00 1 $402,534.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP p50oD) $233.251 $182,401.50 $350.00 1 $273,700.00
25. 403 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $218.23 $87,946.69 $341.00 $137,423.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $3,776.001 $11,328.00 $4,000.00 $12,000.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $1,180.001 $24,780.00 $1,350.00 1 $28,350.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $4,130.001 $4,130.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $1,180.00 $14,160.00 $1,200.00 1 $14,400.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $2,950.00 $5,900.00 $2,500.00 1 $5,000.00
31. 1 EA ConstmctTransitionStructureNo.lperStd334 $1Q,089.00 $10,089.00 $13,200.00 $13,200.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $1,770.001 $1,770.00 $3,200.001 $3,200.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' & 8' water, replace 8" VCP to 8" DIP sewer, install blow-off, gate
valves, elbow, lee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $41,300.00 $41,300.00 $3Q,000.OO $30,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist. Utilities crossing proposed storm drain prior to excavation $29,500.00 $29,500.00 $8,000.001 $8,000.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $5,900.00 $11,800.00 $980.001 $1,960.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Striping & Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $8,260.00 $8,260.00 $5,800.001 $5,800.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $88,500.00 $88,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $29,500.001 $29,500.00 $7,400.001 $7,400.00
TOTAL 1 $3,741,073.92 1 $3,756,337.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPEi\ZNG March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation Crom
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street #14
Cass Construction Inc. #IS Y I b3
HPS Mechanical, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Clear and Gmb, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $139,630.00 1 $139,630.00 $76,420.00 1 $76,420.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $1,500.00 1 $3,000.00 $5,300.00 1 $10,600.00
3. 1400 TONS ARHM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $102.00 1 $142,800.00 $152.40 1 $213,360.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $1.85 $9,176.00 $2.00 $9,920.00
S. 1 S EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish grade $950.00 $14,250.00 $1,120.00 1 $16,800.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $SS0.00 $8,500.00 $1,024.00 1 $] 0,240.00
7. SSO TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $100.00 1 $SS,000.00 $158.50 1 $87,175.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $48.00 1 $37,440.00 $68.00 $53,040.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin w=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $13,700.00 1 $123,300.00 $I 1,780.00 1 $106,020.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=21', incl. local depression, complete in place $11,400.00 1 $250,800.00 $9,990.00 1 $219,780.00
11. I EA Catch Basin W=14', incl. local depression, complete in place $8,200.00 1 $8,200.00 $7,540.00 1 $7,540.00
12. 17 EA Junction StructureNo.2 $5,470.00 1 $92,990.00 $1,910.00 1 $32,470.00
13. 6 EA ManholeNo.2 $9,500.001 $57,000.00 $8,585.00 1 $S1,S10.00
14. 1 EA ManholeNo.4 $16,200.001 $16,200.00 $15,200.00 1 $15,200.00
15. 1 I,S Remove & replace in kind rockscape, inigation d landscape after cons[. of
CB & laterals $28 100.001 $28,100.00 $17Q,000.00 $170,000.00
16. I LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $2,675.001 $2,67$.00 $1,770.00 1 $1,770.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $34.001 $21,760.00 $36.00 1 $23,040.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $14.60 $20,440.00 $8.54 $11,956.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $4.10 $13,940.00 $7.66 $26,044.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8"PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $680.001 $5,440.00 $690.001 $5,520.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $38,400.001 $38,400.00 $153,330.001 $153,330.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (ISOOD) $628.001 $1,798,592.00 $650.001 $1,861,600.00
23. 963 LF 72"RCP(1500D) $514.001 $494,982.00 $516.001 $496,908.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP (ISOOD) $149.001 $116,518.00 $339.001 $265,098.00
25. 403 LF 24"RCP(2000D) $126.001 $50,778.00 $169.00 $68,107.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $1,330.00 $3,990.00 $1,4]0.001 $4,230.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $1,400.001 $29,400.00 $1,410.001 $29,610.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $2,400.001 $2,400.00 $2,820.001 $2,820.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $1,365.001 $16,380.00 $1,180.001 $14,160.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $2,500.001 $5,000.00 $1,700.001 $3,400.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition Structure No. 1 per Std 334 $12,650.001 $12,650.00 $11,650.001 $11,650.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $2,100.001 $2,100.00 $4,100.001 $4,100.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6' 8 B' water, replace 8" VCP to 8" DIP sewer, install blow-off, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $62,150.001 $62,150.00 $40,370.00 $40,370.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist Utilities aossing proposed storm drain pdor to excavation $36,000.001 $36,000.00 $5,450.001 $5,450.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $4,120.001 $8,240.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, SMping & Pavementfdarkings, per plan, complete in place $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $]0,250.001 $10,250.00
37. 1 LS Traffic Control $95,000.001 $95,000.00 $28,920.001 $28,920.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $8,240.001 $8,240.00
TOTAL 1 $3,848,381.00 1 $4,164,888.00
fly /~A
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING March 4, 2008
Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from
Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street
#16
Choctaw Contractors Inc. r r v~+
#17
T. C. Construction Co.,
Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Cleaz and Grub, incl. removal, unclass excav/fill & disposal $350,000.001 $350,000.00 $39,000.001 $39,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove existing tree, including roots and stump $2,000.001 $4,000.00 $250.001 $500.00
3. 1400 TONS ARAM Overlay, incl. pavement preparation & routing $106.00 $148,400.00 $116.001 $162,400.00
4. 4960 SY Cold Plane, per plan $2.50 $12,400.00 $3.001 $14,880.00
5. 15 EA Adjust manhole frame and cover to finish Bade $900.00 $13,500.00 $500.001 $7,500.00
6. 10 EA Adjust water valve box, gas valve & cover to finish grade $400.00 $4,000.00 $300.001 $3,000.00
7. 550 TONS AC Pavement, incl. pavement preparation. Section "A" $85.00 $46,750.00 $87.001 $47,850.00
8. 780 TONS Crushed Aggregate Base $25.00 $19,500.00 $68.001 $53,040.00
9. 9 EA Catch Basin W=28', incl. local depression, complete in place $15,193.001 $136,737.00 $19,000.001 $171,000.00
10. 22 EA Catch Basin W=2 ]', incl. local depression, complete in place $13,844.001 $304,568.00 $15,000.001 $330,000.00
I1. 1 EA Catch Basin W=] 4', incl. local depression, complete in place $12,271.001 $12,271.00 $11,000.001 $11,000.00
12. 17 EA lunctionStructureNo.2 $7,776.00 $132,192.00 $5,100.00 $86,700.00
13. 6 EA ManholeNo.2 $14,633.00 $87,798.00 $8,900.001 $53,400.00
14. 1 EA ManholeNo.4 $19,016.00 $19,016.00 $47,000.001 $47,000.00
15. 1 I,$ Remove &, replace in kind rockscape, irrigation & landscape after cons[. of
CB & laterals $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $1,000.00) $1,000.00
16. 1 LS Sawcut exist. Parkway drain & connect to new catch basin see detail Sht. 3 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
17. 640 LF Construct curb & gutter per Std. 104 or match exist. $35.00 $22,400.00 $30.00 $19,200.00
18. 1400 SF Construct access ramp per Std 102, Single Ramp $11.001 $15,400.00 $13.00 1 $18,200.00
19. 3400 SF Construct P.C.C. Sidewalk to match existing $8.501 $28,900.00 $6.00 1 $2Q,400.00
20. 8 LF Remove interfering portions of exist. 8" PVC bleeder & install 36" RCP $450.001 $3,600.00 $500.00 1 $4,000.00
21. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $10,000.00 1 $1Q,000.00
22. 2864 LF 90" RCP (1800D) $590.00 $1,689,760.00 $730.00 1$2,090,720.00
23. 963 LF 72" RCP (150oD) $550.001 $529,650.00 $500.00 1 $481,500.00
24. 782 LF 36" RCP(1500D) $400.001 $312,800.00 $300.00 1 $234,600.00
25. 403 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $380.001 $153,140.00 $248.00 1 $99,944.00
26. 3 EA Construct concrete collar per APWA Std Dwg No. 380-3 $3,400.001 $10,200.00 $1,800.00 $5,400.00
27. 21 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches per Std 339 $516.001 $10,836.00 $1,900.00 1 $39,900.00
28. 1 LS Plug existing 3-36" RCP pipes with mortar and brick $2,275.00 $2,275.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
29. 12 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per Std 340 $444.00 $5,328.00 $1,900.00 $22,800.00
30. 2 EA Construct house connection remodeling per Std 338, Case A or B $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,600.00 $9,200.00
31. 1 EA Construct Transition Structure No. 1 per Std 334 $13,200.00 $13,200.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00
32. 1 EA Relocate existing water meter & service, complete in place $850.00 $850.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00
33. 1 LS Relocate exist. 6" & e"water, replace e" VCP to e"DIP sewer, install blow-oft, gate
valves, elbow, tee, reducer, etc., per CVWD plan $25,900.001 $25,900.00 $72,000.00 $72,000.00
34. 1 LS Pothole all exist. Utilities crossing proposed storm drain pdor to excavation $23,177.001 $23,177.00 $23,000.001 $23,000.00
35. 2 EA Install construction signs $800.001 $1,600.00 $760.001 $1,520.00
36. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Stdping & Pavement Markings, per plan, complete in place $8,300.001 $8,300.00 $7,300.00 $7,300.00
37. I LS Traffic Control $46,315.001 $46,315.00 $38,000.00 $38,000.00
38. 1 LS SWPPP $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00
TOTAL 1 $4,247,763.00 1$4,259,554.00
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date:
To:
From:
By:
Subject:
March 19, 2008
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
P165
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Co munity Development
Jonathan Wu, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSI AL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KOA
CORPORATION TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT FOUR LOCATIONS AND THE DESIGN OF SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM AND COORDINATION TIMING AT TWELVE
INTERSECTIONS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TO BE FUNDED FROM
TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NUMBERS: 11243035650/1042124-0,
1 1 2430356 50/1 6241 24-0, 11243035650/1625124-0, 11243035650/1626124-0, AND
11243035650/1643124-0, AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$64,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1 1 243035650/1 6 321 24-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with
KOA Corporation, authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $94,160.00 and 10%
contingency in the amount of $9,416.00 for providing engineering services for the design of traffic
signals at four locations and the design of signal synchronization system and coordination timing at
12 intersections, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreements and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Requests for Proposals (RFP) were originally sent out in December 2007 to five consulting firms
known to the City to provide Traffic Engineering services for various projects for the City and other
municipalities. Four firms responded to the RFP. After a careful evaluation of the firms'
qualifications, personnel, relevant experiences and fees. It is recommended that a Professional
Services Agreement be awarded to KOA Corporation.
The consultant will prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimates (PS&E) for new traffic signals
at four locations (Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway, Banyan Street at Fire Station No. 175,
Church Street at Hermosa Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue) and design the
signal interconnect system and coordination timing for five existing traffic signals on Carnelian
StreeWineyard Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Vivero Street, and for seven existing traffic
signals q~n Haven Avenue between I-210 Freeway on/off ramps and Wilson Avenue.
Mahdi A uzri
Deputy ity Manager/Community Development
MA:JTW
Attachments
P166
MP SNOW DROP
P~ I
y I
{~,. t _~ _-~_.~
~:- ~ _
HI SIDE: -^- i
-~y ,2 ~ N -_~ r-'~ i
r,~_" _
i- ~ 4"JfG'S0 -- - --I _
~ C L- . ~_.(.j r WILSON ~ ; ~!tY1L'50N BEE
w _
i- .tit ~_'~,' - J~
~II_-'c "'-
y•: r
y
'.-'LY-;o ..c
oc~-i.-rl
_1G r-il~-BAM N !m
m'-IJ l_c ~~ f. `1
l BANYAN -~'-~-~3 ,C.-I
;
a
~ .
.~L
I
r~
~
~ ;
j~~"
'l '-l y ~~T
"
.' I.
_r I_~I'
'-I L,1! '~ I I
_
~
~l 1-
4
=~`1}` -
~~
1
`
~~ i
`
_ Y
~
7
~ I
_
Iw I
w L
'
~ rFi RA
MP
,.oe.l ...,_~J. -
1
i'
yv, 1
~141-[ ~; ,
o'
- l 1210
'-
ar
-J' i 19T
~ 'l ~ rL _lL Cl %~~
: Ip ~
cvi
I
IJ ~: ~
~
~I`L
..1 .1 Ntl.~ --'W ~ -~ J+:J-~
_ ~
~ i
~
F+~;
.f-1
I ~
.
.
J ~
~ K~~. TF--
A ~
'_,i.c -' _.~" 11
~,
F _ iC', 1 ./ ~ _
!', r; VI OR
I ~ VICTORI
~
r
:-1- - - ..u .,.__',L :(:.. ~='J
~ '~.I~ Acl'J
=>? .r, r-
`,
-
C~'~
,
ILL
L+
I
_ ti r - r '
y
~
+r
~
A T
T
hc~ .
_,
r
NEB ~
- ~ !~ ..•,
-
~ ~
c E LINE'.I
B
,
S. ~7.L
iT
LE ASE
E17
._. '
U„' r
Li ..-{;i~
~ /. '. -: ~ 11,c. Icl' _i '? P
>--I ,~I -L,J ~f ~~ - t'~?>;' WY/ nL~7,-'I,
- III
.
` -~~r_.-C .7_
'll'
i~_''.-;
~' wT- IIJ F. ,~..r ~,~, J~.`~. A ,A 3~
Y~c',
l~ I - - _~
.;I~
~-
r,-.~IJ
;;,'~~
~r~
,_~n :_II HUM .~, r ,,, ).fin-,a _
F-• P
kll1 ,~~- ER
d ~I [:'~'yi'ILd
'
~
- -54-d -'..~i -_j
_~~ i
-
-1 -.oe~:: ,I-~,I ~-~rEr.
r-~ ~
--
`-
f~~:
~
: s
,
=a'tie
i_ - m IOb 3
rHI
.
_
.~ _ _
T m i _
o'~=~iko"1 ~~~~' 11-~J~I -
J'_~AR C3N/ - ~:i VIC EN
J Lam. __
U~ j_; I I~ _~. TH .
~ ,_- ~-r~ fl, ~ ~" ~_ .J R5EYJ
-` 1~
L
I
I - _
'L==L 8TH I :._I. ..1;~-. __~
! I _
_
~ T-
-
~
7rH - - hfi i
1
, I
~ ~~ I
6
~
, ,1, ~--;
- - ,I. ST I
PL
I ~ I ~I I 6TH
~
L
I I
J ' i _rci I' <
~'..LJ.
1-=~~
{
I I 4TH I
N
Proposed Traf£c Signal Installation Intersection
vao cUCn MO^.C
- ~= VICINITY MAP
e
J ~ Proposed Traffic Signal Installation Ho, „ s~,~
r,,,
P167
Wilson Avenue
Amber Lane
B
Sv
t
anyan
ee
L
A
emon
venue
Alta Loma Drive
e
fk'
~
~
I
a
v
6
c
i
i =
Baseline Rd
~n Q
c
m ~
~
d A
n
V C
Vivero St
' ~ I
try
o
V L
Q
?, Fe ` San Bernardino Road
Foothill Boulevard
Q LEGEND N
v
- b
v
• Study Intersections
Noc co Scale
gp`~ /^~ pp
111.J t'! ~~J LLaC 1J~~1 dV ld City of Rancho Cucamonga Figure I
- ~ ""''"" "'~~'~ ~'--~'i'-~ Proposal (or Traffic Signal System Design & CoordinationTiming Services Study In[ersection Location Map
P168
STAFF REPORT t_
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT '(~`~~'
RANCHOrOJ
Date: March 19, 2008 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer S~
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,243.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, WHEELER PAVING, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A
10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,324.30, FOR THE JASPER STREET/
ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (AROUND STORK ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL), TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
1 1 1 031 6 5650/ 1 661 1 1 0-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $83,243.00 to the apparent low bidder, Wheeler Paving,
Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,324.30, for the Jasper
Street/Orchard Street Sidewalk Improvements (around Stork Elementary School), to be funded from
Beautification funds, Account No. 1 1 1 031 65650/1 661 1 1 0-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 26, 2008, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $151,035.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent
low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents.
The scope of work consists of removal of existing A.C. sidewalks, landscaping and other
miscellaneous items affected by the proposed sidewalk, construction of vinyl fence, retaining curb,
driveways, drive approaches, curb & gutter, access ramps, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk.
The contract documents call for thirty-five (35) working days to complete this construction.
Deputy~City Manager/Community Development
MA/RD/SH:Is
Attachments
P169
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JASPER ST./ORCHARD ST. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ~, N
AROUND STORE ELEM. SCH.
N.T.S.
n
^~~n
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 26, 2008 APPARENT LOw BIDDER 1 a r I I V
JASPER STREET /ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK
1117PROVEMENTS (AROUND STORK ENGINEER'S Addisoa Equipment
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ESTIMATE Wheeler Pavln lac. Reatal Yakar
NO QTY DMT DESCRIPTION (%IS'I' AMOUNT W6'I' AMOUNT DO6T AMOUITI' CAST A8[ODNT
Clearing antl Grubbing (all misc. removals,
including shnlbs, AC, PCC, chain link fence,
gates, concrete foundatwns, bouMers and all 515,000.00 515,000.00 516,000.00 516,000.00 323,]00.00 $23, !00.00 521,000.00 321,000.00
1. 1 LS misc. excavations, greding and disposal
5600.00 81,200.00 $1,000.001 $2,000.00 58]5.001 53,'/50.00 $500.001 53,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove tree
5250.00 $]50.00 $250.001 $950.00 $250.001 5]50.00 8250.001 $]50.00
3. 3 EA Remove mailbox antl replace with new (same kintl)
5200.00 $400.00 $250.00 $500.00 $125.00 $250.00 $200.001 $400.00
4. 2 EA Remove antl relDWle exist Mailbox to top of sitlawalk
4' PCC Sidewalk over compacted native per Sttl.
101 end 103 (including capping and/or relDCafion 5].50 $66,000.00 $3.35 $29,480.00 $3.00 $26,400.00 53.95 $34,]60.00
of existing inige0on system and shrub trimming
5. 6800 SF aRec[ed by the proposed sidewalk)
4' PCC Sidewalk over compactetl native per plan
(including atltlttional sprinkler heatls,capping $9.50 55,100.00 $].00 $4,200.00 $5.00 53,000.00 55.50 $3,300.00
antl/or relocation of existing irti9ation system,
6. fi00 SF complete in place)
518.00 514,880.00 53.901 SJ,62].00 $].001 56,510.00 55.501 55,115.00
7 930 SF Cansttutl drive approach per den antl per Std.101
540'00 $]20.00 $23.501 $423.00 5]0.001 51,260.00 535.001 5630.00
B 18 LF Reconstruct curb antl gutter (Type A243)Ver Sttl. 104
e' PCC driveway (520-C-2500) Over compactetl $18.00 56,400.00 56.401 $2,560.00 56.]51 52,]00.00 $6.501 52,600.00
9 400 SF native
Construct access ramps, including recOnetr0p50n 83,500.00 $14,000.00 $]]5.001 33,100.00 $1,650.001 $6,600.00 $1,]00.001 $6,800A0
10 4 EA of curb only per plan and Std. 102
525.00 $250.00 $15.501 $155.00 $61.501 $615.00 530.00 $300.00
11 10 LF Construct 8-concrete headerper Std. 534
$30.00 $2.880.00 $19.25 51,848.00 $18.50 $1,]]6.00 $25.001 $2,400.00
12 96 LF Construct retaining curb per plan
Reinstall bounder per plan (Detail B-B)within the
$20,00 $4,400.00 $].001 $1,540.00 $6.50 $1,430.00 $15.00 $3,300.00
13 220 SF RNJ area
54.50 $1,665.00 $].001 $2,590.00 $9.001 $3,330.00 $6.00 $2,220.00
14 370 SF d-esphall concrete (A.C.)over tznmpactetl native
Relocate ezistlng brick mailbox (8443 Orchard)
excavate fo foundation and relocate as shown on $1,200.D0 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 5600.00 $300.00 $300.00
plan (if damaged during relocation, the conimctor
15 1 LS shall replace the mailbox in like and kind)
Replace sod al sleeper gretle to match existing
16
380
SF
(5:1 max. grzde) $30p 51,100.00 S2.OO I ~ 5]60.00 $5.001 51,900.00 53.00 1 51,140.00
ons c vmy ante avanna y my
Fence or approved equal)per plan and $80.00 39.600.00 546.00 $],360.00 54500 5],200.00 542.50 1 56,800.00
17 160 LF menufacturefs specs, complete in place
Conswct two 6' double vinyl gate (Savannah) by
USA Vinyl Fence or approved equal)per plan and St,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 51,200.00 $1,110.00 $1,110.00 53,300.00 51,300.00
18 1 LS manufacturefs specs, complete in place
Remove and relOCate signs to concrete Sidewalk
$350.00 $1,900.00 $150.00 1 5600.00 5250.00 1 $1,000.00 $150.00 1 5600.00
19 4 EA (Std. 401-B)
$250.00 $250.00 $350.00 1 8350.00 $65.00 1 $65.00 5250.00 $250.00
20 1 EA Adjust WM to grads
$150.00 $300.00 5350.00 1 $]00.00 $185.00 1 $3]0.00 $250.00 $500.00
21 2 EA Atljust water valves bg2de
$2,000.00 52,000.00 $2,000.00 1 52,000.00 $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 $1,500.00 1 51,500.00
22 1 LS Traffic Control
TOTAL 8161,035.00 883,243.00 894,816.00 I 896,966.D0
Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 26, 2008 ~ e c
JASPER STREET /ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS (AROOND STORK ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL IPS Ivc. .iDC Kvcma Inc.
UNIT Sm UINT GRIT
RO QTY UR[T UBaCRIPTION CO6T AMOUIPT CURT AMOUNT COUT A610URT
Clearing and Grubbing (all rtnsc. removals, Inclutling
shrubs, AC, PCC, chain link fence, gates, concrete
fountlations, boultlers antl all misc. excavations, grotling $18,000.00 $10,000.00 $26,000.00 $2fi,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
1. 1 LS antl disposal
5300.00 5600.00 53pp.oo $600.00 s22s.oo 0050.60
2. 2 EA Remove tree
$250.00 $]50,00 $225.00 Sfi]5.00 5200.00 5600,00
3. 3 EA Remove mailbox and replace with new lsame klntl)
$250.00 $500.00 $150.00 $000.00 $100.00 $rzOp.Op
4. 2 EA RemoveaM relocate exist Malldoxbbp of sitlewalk
4- PCC Sidewalk over tompatletl native per Sld. 101 and
103 (inClutling capping antllor relocation pf existing $d.00 $35,200.00 SS00 $44,000.00 5650 $5],200.00
irrigation system antl shmb mmmng affectetl by the
5. 8800 SF proposetl sitlewalk)
d" PCC sitlewalk over ppmpaclatl native per plan (Including
atltlitional sprinkler heatls, capping antllpr relocation of $000 $2,g00.0o $5,50 $3,300.00 $fi.]5 $4,OSO.Oo
6. 600 SF existing irrigation system, complete in place)
$]'co $4510.00 $5.001 $],990.00 $8.00 1 5],440.00
7 930 SF DOrISaaCl drive appmacn per plan aM per$td.101
$2500 $450.00 $35.001 5630.00 560.00 1 $1,080.00
8 i6 LF Rewrtshud cuN and g~+aer lType A2-8)per Std. fOd
9 400 SF e"PCC driveway(520-C-2500)over compacted native 3)25 $rz,9oo.00 $8.501 Sa,aoo.oo $].65 1 $3,060.00
COnsUUCI access ramps, including reconslNClipn Of Wrb $2,300.00 $9,200,00 $1,950.001 $],800.00 52,600.00 $i 1,rz0p.00
10 4 EA only per plan and Sld. 102
" $som SsOO.oo S2o.oo $200.00 Slo.oo Sloo.oo
11 10 LF GOOStNCt a
concrete heatler per Sttl. 634
12
96
LF
Construct retaining curb per plan 51].00 $I,baz.oo $20.00 $1,9zo.oo SIS.UO $1,400.00
13 220 SF Reinstall bounder per plan (Detail B-B)within the R/W area $9.00 $1,960.00 Se.op $1,]60.00 S10.0p $2,200.00
14 3]0 SF 4'asphalt concrete (A.CJover compaced native $].10 $2,62].00 $].50 $2,]95.00 $10.001 $3,]00.00
Relocate existing brick mailbox (8443 Orchard) excavate to
fountlalion and relocate as shown on plan (if tlamagetl $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,800.00
tluring relocation, the conlroclor shall replace the mailbox
15 1 LS in like and kintl)
Replace sod at steeper grade to rtHtfh existing (5:1 Tax. $100 $2,fi60.pp 53.001 $1
190.00 $4.001 $1
520
00
16 360 SF 9rotle) , ,
.
onsuuc o viny ence avanna y my ence or
apOroved epuap per plan and manufacturefs specs, $30.00 $0,900.00 Sas.00 $],200.00 550.00) $e,oo0.00
17 160 LF complete in place
Construct two 6' double vinyl gate (Savannah) by USA
Vinyl Fence or apprOVetl Cqua) per plan antl $3,00000 $3,000.00 $I,SOO.dp $1,500.00 S1,rz50.00 $1,250.00
I8 1 LS manufacturefs specs, complete in place
Remove and relocate signs to concrete sitlewalk (Sftl. 401-
19
4
EA
B) $200.00 $600.00 Steo.00 $]20.00 $250.001 $1,000.00
20 1 F1~ Adjusl WMto grade $450.00 Sa50.0o $50.00 $50.00 $150.001 5150.00
21 2 EA Atljusl water valves to gratle $250.00 $SO0.00 $]6.00 5150.00 Slso.p0 $300.00
22 1 L$ Tra~C Control $1.500.Da $1,500.OU S]sp.op $]50.00 $1,500.001 $1,500.00
TOTAL j98,4e9.p0 j113,11p.00 $11R,2gU.Op
P171
Page 2
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPErv1uC FEB0.UAR1' 36. 20x3 r e a
JASPER STREET /ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS (AROUND STORK ELEMENTARY Grand Pacific
SCHOOL C.S. Le Conct. Ise. Coatracton Inc. E.C. Coact., Inc.
UAIT HID OFIT UNIT
NO QTY UF[T aEeCRIPTIDF COUT AMOOFT COFT AHOVFT COS'[ AMOUNT
Clearing end Grubbing (all misc. remDVals, inclutling
ahfub5, AC, PCC, cha10 Ok fenDe, gates, DOnRele
fountlatipns, boulders end all misc. excavations, gentling $2$ 0]6.00 522,0]6.00 $]5,000,00 $15,000,00 524,690.00 524,690.00
1. 1 LS and disposal
S2°4'DO %489.00 5300.001 $1,600.00 Sl,ooOm $],ooa.ao
2. 2 EA Remove free
5228.00 Efi89.00 $750.001 52,250.00 5500.00 91,500.00
3. 3 FA Rertave mallOD+eM replace xlM new lsame lOnO)
52J5.00 5470.00 $500.001 51,000.00 5200.001 5400.00
4. 2 EA Rertbve end rebwte Rlsl MallbOx b by of si0ewelk
4' PCC $itlewalk over compacted native per SItl. 101 antl
103(indudinBCappiDB eOdlor felOC81iD00f exis110B 55.15 $45,]20.00 $5.10 544,a9D.DD $5.65 $49,720.00
irtigation system antl shrub Idmnvng affected by the
5. 8800 SF proposetl sidevxlk)
4' PCC Sitlewalk over cortpacled native per plan (inGuding
atlditional sprinkler heads, rap0~n9 andlOr relocation of ,1515 $3,090.00 5510 5],@0.00 55.65 Ssa90.00
6. 600 SF existing iMgadon system cpmplete in place)
38.1E $S,fi91.6o $d.00 E7,440.00 ~ $9.001 $7,440.00
7 930 $F LansbucldMe BDD~Dac6 pet pldndM per 610. 101
Sbo.oo $1,080.00 S2a.DD 5504.00 550.001 5900.00
8 16 LF Recoretrutl cum em Sutter (Type A2-8t per Sld. 104
SL]J 50.092.00 $8.501 53,400.00 SI0.00 $4,000.00
9 400 $F 6" PCC driveway (520-C-2500) over COmpaGetl native
(.OnS[NCt ecCe551afI1p5, lOGD010g raCDO51NCIID001 CUN $2,47].00 $9,99Y,o0 $1,650.00] $5,600,00 $2,500001 $10,000,00
10 4 FA Doty per plan and $fd. 102
~1'~ SatD.oO S2o.0D $200.00 525.001 5250.00
11 10 LF COOSWCY e'concrete heatler per Sttl. 534
541.00 $]•9]b.o0 Szs.oo l g2,4D0.oD 535 ao Sa,36o.00
12 96 LF CDnsINCt retainin wro Der plan
$lO.DD 52,200.00 $5.001 SI
100.00 SJ.57 S7SS.a0
13 220 SF Reinstall bounder per plan (Detail B-B)wilhin the RlVJ area ,
$8.00 g2,9b0.00 915.001 EC,660.00 $10.701 $],959.00
14 370 SF 4'asp0alt fAncrele lAC.)pver wmpatled native
Relocate ezislinp brick mailbox (6443 Orchartl) excavate to
fountlatipn end relocate as shown Dn plan (if damaged $I,tszoo 51,15700 SL000.00 gl,ooo.oD 51,vo.oo $1,170.00
tlurinB relDntion. the contractor shalt replace the mailbox
16 1 L$ in like antl kind)
Replace sW a151eeper grade to fr6tph existing (5:1 rtnx.
16
360
SF
grade) 51.00 5380.00 52.50 ) E950.00 53.62 1 E1,]]5.60
onswc wny ence avanna oy my ence or
appmvetl epuel) per plan and nanufaCluref5 specs, 55900 $9,440.00 566.00 ] 510.560.00 S67.OO I 510,720.00
17 160 LF cprtplefe in place
Construct two 6'tlouble vinyl gale (Savannah) by USA
Vinyl Fence OrdppfOVetl equdp per plan and $1]4400 $1,]44.00 52,640.00 $2,Ca0.00 $],350.00 $3,J50.00
18 1 LS manufeGUrers specs, complete in place
Remove and reoUte signs tD Concrete 5itlevYdk (Std. 401-
1]00.00 $1,200.00 S4W.oo 51,000.00 5150.00 1 5600.00
19 4 EA B)
116pp.00 51,400.00 5250.00 1 5250.00 9500.00 1 5500.00
20 1 EA Adju5tWM10 Bratle
5]00.00 51 400.00 550000 1 51
000.00 $75. W I 5150.00
21 2 FA Adj051 w21er valves 10 grade ,
54,357.00 $4,J57.o0 S1p,Ppp.a0 510,000.00 51,500.00 1 51,500.00
22 1 LS Traffic Control
TOTAL $122,627.60 5123,664.00 5131,760.00
P172
Page 2
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 26, 2008 m u n
JASPER STREET /ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS (AROUND STORK ELEMENTARY ,]MR General e. Parker 8agiaeering,
SCHOOL En 'veerin Inc. FPG CO
OR[T am UBIT LIF1T
NO QTY UA[i O88CRIPTIOA COST AEEOUAT C08T MfOUBT COST A$fOUFT
Clearing antl Grubbing (all misc. removals, incutling
shrubs. AC, PCC, chain link fence, gales, concrete $45,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $90,000.00 $93,195.00 $93,195.00
foundations, boultlers antl all misc. excavations, grading
1. 1 LS antl tlispbsal
$]50.00 $1,500.00 $600.001 $1,200.00 $950.00 $1,90000
2. 2 EA Remove tree
$250.00 $]50.00 $300.00 $900.00 $250.00 $]50.00
3. 3 EA Remove mailbox antl replace will, nea lsame klntl)
$>50.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $600.00 $150.00 $300.00
4. 2 EA Remove and relocate exist MallbOx tv by of sidewalk
4' PCC Sitlewalk over compadetl native per Sltl. 101 antl
103 (inclutling capping and/or relocation of existing ga.25 $3],a0o.oo $ss0 $4e,9oo.o0 $s.25 $46,200.00
irrigation system antl shmb trimming aHedetl by the
5. 8600 SF proposetl sidewalk)
4' PCC Bitl¢walk over compatled native per plan (including g].20 $9,320.00 $].00 $4,200,00 $10.00 $6,000.00
atltlitional sprinkler heatls, capping antl/vr relocation bf
6. 600 SF exislinB imgatien system, complete in place)
$1500 $13,950.00 $9.001 58,3]0.00 $9.501 58,83500
] 930 $F CgwhVCl drive epvroach per plan and per 6W.101
$5000 $900.00 $100.00 $L,a00.00 $50,00 $900.00
B 16 LF Recoralmd cuN antlguXer (type A2-Bi per $W. 10d
$15 W $6,000.00 $11.50 $9,600.00 $9.50 $1,800.00
9 400 SF 6" PCG tlrlveWay (520-G2500) Ovaf cOmpatletl nativ¢
1)On$tNClacbe55 ramps, inclutling redon5Wd1i00 Of cufb $2,ppp,pp $8,000.00 $],200.OO $12,800.00 $1,499.OO $5,]9fi.00
10 4 EA only per plan and Sld. 102
Sso.oo $500.00 $20.00 $200.00 S4o.0o Saoo.oo
13 10 LF Construct B" concrete header per Std. 534
$56.60 Sa,eoo.00 $te.bo $1726.00 $36.00 $1,456.00
12 96 LF Construct retaining curt per plan
13 220 SF Reinstall bounder Der plan (Oelail B-B) within the R/W area 520.00 $4,900,00 $20.00 54,900.00 $35.00 $].]00.00
S].50 $2,]]5.00 $6.001 $2,220.00 $9,00 $J,330.00
14 370 SF 4'esOhall conttere lACJ DVerwmpadeA wove
Relocate existing brick mailbox X8443 Orchartl) excavate to
fOllnda600 and r¢OLat¢ d5 shpwn OO pdn (I( tlarrNgetl $1,500.00 $1,SOODO $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,]49.00 $3,]49.00
during relocation, the contractor shall replace the mailbox
15 1 LS in like antl kind)
Repare sdtl at steeper grade t0 nHtch existing (5:1 max. g5.o11 $1,900.00 $1.50 $590.00 $2.50 $950.00
16 360 SF gratle)
On5 NC v vl0y ¢ne2 aVabnd by Iny ence pr
approvetl equal) per plan and IrnnufacWreds Sp¢cs, $]5.00 $12,000.00 $40AO $6,400.00 $99.00 $],840.110
17 160 LF complete in place
Construct Iwo 6'tl0uble vinyl gate (Savannah) by USA
Vnyl Fence or approved equaq per plan and 83.000.00 $3,000.00 S1,5oo.00 $)500.00 $1,225.00 $1,225.00
16 1 LS manufacturer's specs, complete in place
RemOVe and relocate signs 10 concrete sidewalk (Sttl. 401- 8300 W $500.00 5200.00 1 $800.00 $199.00 S]96.00
19 4 EA BI
3250.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $400.00 $400.00
20 1 EA Atljust WM to grade
8250.00 Ssoo oo $500.09 $1,000.00 SvsoO Saso.oo
21 2 FA Atljust water valves to gratle
8$,]50.00 $8,]50.00 E1spo.00 $1,500.00 $3,169.OO $3,169.00
22 1 L$ Tfdffe 000tr0
TOTAL $140,495.00 $348,188.00 $151,041.00
P173
Page 2
BID SUMMARY FOR B[D OPENING FEBRUARY 26, 2008 t3
JASPER STREET /ORCHARD STREET SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS (AROUND STORK ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL Hard 8s Ha er, Inc.
UNiT HID
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT
Clearing and Grubbing (all misc. removals, including shrubs,
AC, PCC, chain link fence, gates, concrete foundations, $79,790.00 $79,790.00
1. 1 LS boulders and all misc. excavations, grading and disposal
$1,000.00 $2,000.00
2. 2 EA Remove tree
$1,000.00 $3,000.00
3. 3 EA Remove mailbox and replace with new (same kind)
$1,000.00 $2,000.00
4. ~ 2 EA Remove and relocate exist. Mailhox to top of sidewalk
4" PCC Sidewalk over compacted native per Std. 101 and
103 (including capping and/or relocation of existing irrigation $9.00 $79,200.00
system and shrub Vimming affected by the proposed
5. 8800 SF sidewalk)
4" PCC Sidewalk over compacted native per plan (including
additional sprinkler heads, capping and/or relocation of $9.00 $5,400.00
6. 600 SF existing irrigation system, complete in place)
$12.00 $11,160.00
7 930 SF Constnrct drive approach per plan and per Std. 101
8 18 LF Reconstruct curb and gutter (Type A2-8) per Std. 104 $100.00 $1,800.00
9 400 SF 8" PCC driveway (520-C-2500) over compacted native $12.00 $4,800.00
Construct access ramps, including reconstruction of curb 55,000.00 $20,000.00
10 4 EA only per plan and Std. 102
11 10 LF Construct 8" wncrete header per Std. 534 5200.00 $2,000.001
S10o.00 $9,600.001
12 96 LF Construct retaining curb per plan
13 220 SF Reinstall bounder per plan (Detail B-B) within the RAN area S10o.00 $22,000.001
$15.00 $5,550.00
14 370 SF 4" asphalt concrete (A.C.) over compacted native
Relocate existing brick mailbox (8443 Orchard) excavate to
foundation and relocate as shown on plan (if damaged $10,000.00 $10,000.00
during relocation, the contractor shall replace the mailbox in
15 1 LS like and kind)
Replace sod at steeper grade to match existing (5:1 max. g15.o0 $5,700.00
16 380 SF grade)
ons ruc wny ence avanna y Iny ence or
approved equal) per plan and manufacturer's specs, 550.00 $8,000.00
17 160 LF complete in place
Construct two 6' double vinyl gate (Savannah) by USA Vinyl
Fence or approved equal) per plan and manufacturer's $10,000.00 $10,000.00
18 1 LS specs, complete in place
Remove and relocate signs to concrete sidewalk (Std. 401- 51,000.00 $4,000.001
19 4 EA B)
20 1 EA Adjust WM to grade 51,000.00 $1,000.00
21 2 EA Adjust water valves to grade 51,000.00 $2,000.00
510,000.00 $10,000.00
22 1 LS Traffic Control
TOTAL $299,000.00
P174
Page 2
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II
P175
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2005-00086,
LOCATED AT 9300 SANTA ANITA AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SUBMITTED
BY TRICO TCH, LTD.
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee
Cash deposit, for DRC2005-00086, located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street,
submitted by Trico TCH, Ltd.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER Trico TCH, Ltd.
3100-A Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash deposit
#CR083642 $1,790.00
Mahdi luzri
Deputy ity Manager/Community Development
MA:TLV/rlc
Attachment
P176
f00THILLBOULEVARD 66
w ,
z L~ ~VP
~PLQ~O, z
Z ~J W
w
= 6TH STREET
Z
w
Y
J
_J
~ 4TH STREET
BERNARDINO
w
r-
w
2
0
a
of
15
~ SITE W
w
d
~ O
Z Q
Q ~
Q 1-
~ W
Z
vQi SAN BERNARDINO AVE.
FRWY ~I
10 \
e
CITY OF
RANC-~O CUCANdONGA
Er\'C(NEERINC DMSION
ITEM: ~ ~ ~ ~~
d
T[TIGE: ®G~fi'~
STAFF REPORT
P177
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: March 19, 2008 C,,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR DRC2003-00869, LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET,
SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION, CO.
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee
Bond, for DRC2003-00869, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street,
submitted by Oltmans Construction, Co.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER Oltmans Construction, Co.
10005 Mission Mill Road
Whittier. CA 90608
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #104199927
Resp ully submitted,
C
Mah i Aluzri
Dep ty City Manager/Community Development
MA:TLV
$76,920.00
Attachment
P178
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~V
rte: L~P~2D~.~11/1~G~ --
~: V/C.l/Y/TI' MAP
ENGIlIEERING DIVLSION
STAFF REPORT \
ENGINEERING DEP~IRTMENT
RANCHO
Date: March 19, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP 16167,
LOCATED SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND 9TH STREET,
SUBMITTED BY ON VINEYARD, LLC.
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Cash
Deposit, for Parcel Map 16167, located southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9th Street,
submitted by On Vineyard, LLC.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER
Release
Mahdi
MA:TLV/rlc
On Vineyard, LLC
515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Maintenance Cash Deposit
Manager/Community Development
#CR088309 $36,970.00
#CR094348 $29,480.00
P179
Attachment
P1
W
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM; VlclNl TY MAP
TITLE: Pa„ec~~ MAP 1 ~ l (07
EXHIBIT:.1.
P181
ORDINANCE NO. 790
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO
WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING
FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP
FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU)
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND
HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14
A. RECITALS.
On January 23 and continued to February 13, 2008, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed
public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development District
Amendment DRC2006-00634 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted
its Resolution No. 08-05, recommending that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Draft Ordinance.
2. On March 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development District Amendment
DRC2006-00634.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 5, 2008,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 17 acres of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located on the north side
of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa
P182
Avenue, and is presently improved with existing commercial
(The Whole Enchilada, Espinoza Tire, Route 66 Memories,
Twins Club, Shop & Go) and residential (single-family and
apartment) land uses, agricultural uses, and vacant land. Said
property is currently designated as Community Commercial
(CC) Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3); and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low
Residential and is developed with existing single-family
residences; the property to the west is designated General
Commercial and Low Residential and is developed with
existing commercial and residential uses; the property to the
east is designated General Commercial and Industrial Park
and is developed with an automotive service station and
industrial uses; and the property to the south is designated
General Commercial and is developed with restaurant, day
care, and office uses; and
c. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and will provide for development, within
the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
d. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
e. This Amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a
significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding
properties; and
SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the
Environmental Impact Report, together with all written and oral
reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council makes the following findings under
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act:
a. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations
§15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines"), the City prepared an Initial
Environmental Study (the "Initial Study") for the Project. The
Initial Study concluded that there was substantial evidence
that the Project might have a significant environmental impact
on several specifically identified resources, including air
quality, noise, and traffic. Pursuant to Guidelines Section
15064 and 15081, and based upon information contained in
P183
the Initial Study, the City ordered the preparation of an
environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Rancho Workforce
Housing Project. On October 1, 2007, the City prepared and
sent a Notice of Preparation of the EIR to responsible, trustee,
and other interested agencies and persons in accordance with
Guidelines Section 15082(a) fora 30-day review period. The
City circulated the Draft EIR to the public and other interested
parties fora 45-day review period from November 15, 2007
through December 31, 2007, consistent with the 45-day public
comment period required by Guidelines Section 15087(c) and
15105. During this public comment period, the City received
six (6) written comment letters regarding the adequacy of the
Draft EIR. The City also received an additional two (2) letters
after the 45-day review period, for a total of eight (8) written
comment letters. The City prepared written responses to all
the comment letters received on the Draft EIR in accordance
with Public Resources Code §21092.5 and CEQA Guidelines
Section 15088.
b. The City Council is the decision-making body for General Plan
Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District
Amendment DRC2006-00634 for the Rancho Workforce
Housing Project. For purposes of making its
recommendations on these applications, the City Council has
received and reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report
("FEIR") for the Rancho Workforce Housing Project along with
the oral and written testimony received thereon during the
hearing prior to any action on the Project. Based on that
review, the City Council hereby certifies that the FEIR was
completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), and
the Guidelines and that it adequately addresses the impacts
and provides for appropriate mitigation measures for General
Plan Amendment DRC2006-0635, Development District
Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Development Review
DRC2006-00633, and all other approvals necessary to carry
out the Rancho Workforce Housing Project. The City Council
further finds that that the modifications to the FEIR that have
been made since circulation of the DEIR, do not constitute the
addition of new significant information to the FEIR within the
meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5.
c. The City Council finds that based on the FEIR, additional
public comments, and the written and oral staff report, and
Exhibit A to this Ordinance, that the Project will not cause
significant environmental impacts except with respect to
interior noise level impacts, short-term construction noise
P184
impacts, long-term operational noise impacts, cumulative
noise impacts, and traffic impacts with regard to opening year
2009 with commercial conditions, residential conditions, and
entire project (commercial and residential) conditions. With
respect to all of these potentially significant impacted areas
and resources, the FEIR identifies feasible mitigation
measures for each impact that reduce the level of impact to
less than significant.
d. In response to each significant impact identified in the FEIR,
and listed in Section 4.b. of this Resolution, changes or
alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into the
Project, which avoid the impacts identified. The specific
changes and alterations required are contained in Appendix F
of the FEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein by
reference. The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program, contained in Appendix F of the FEIR,
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts of
the Project as explained in Exhibit A to this Ordinance. The
City Council finds that the mitigation measures and Mitigation
Monitoring Program will avoid or mitigate all significant
environmental effects of the Project.
e. The City Council finds that the FEIR describes a reasonable
range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill the basic
objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the
required no project alternative, the reduced intensity
alternative, the all residential portion of the project alternative,
and the off-site location alternative. For the reasons explained
in Exhibit A, the alternatives identified in the FEIR are not
feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives
of the Project or would do so only to a much lesser degree,
and therefore leave unaddressed significant social and
economic goals the Project was designed to achieve, and are
thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations,
and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate
the significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed
Project. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, the
City Council finds that each of the alternatives is determined to
be infeasible.
f. The City Council further finds that the Mitigation Monitoring
Program has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The
Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council adopt each of the mitigation measures set forth in the
FEIR and incorporate those measures into the Project. The
Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council
adopt the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" contained in
Appendix F of the FEIR and incorporated herein by reference.
The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be used to monitor
compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that
have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval.
P185
g. The custodian of records for the FEIR, the Mitigation
Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute
the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's
decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for
public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750.
SECTION 4: The Development Districts Map is hereby amended to change
from Community Commercial (CC) Foothill Boulevard District
(Subarea 3) to Mixed Use (MU) Foothill Boulevard District
(Subarea 3) for 17 acres of land, located on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center
Avenue, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibits B
and C and in accordance with the condition shown below:
Planning Department
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense
any action brought against the City, its agents, officers,
or employees, because of the issuance of such
approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and
attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a
result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall
not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of
this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision
or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted
by subsequent legislation.
P186
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its
passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
P187
EXHIBIT A
TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUINCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 08-"
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings
I. Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (the
"Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an
environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects
on the environment that will occur if a project is approved or carried out unless the public
agency makes one or more of the following findings:
A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project,
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified
in the EIR.
B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency
and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by
such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation
measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR.
Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed
Rancho Workforce Housing Project. These findings are based upon evidence presented in the
record of these proceedings, both written and oral, the FEIR and all of its contents, the
Comments and Responses to Comments on the FEIR, and staff and consultants' reports
presented to the City Council.
II. Project Objectives
As set forth in the FEIR, the objectives of the project (the "Project Objectives") are as
follows:
A. Locate development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any
potential environmental impacts;
B. Provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income
segments of the community;
C. More fully utilize the availability of existing public improvements, thereby
providing maximum benefit to the general public;
D. Augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within
the City; and
1123]-0001\]031054v3.doc
P188
E. Promote balanced, efficient development that is functional, safe, attractive, and
convenient to users, and which will strengthen the local economy.
III. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant
The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an Initial study to determine significant
effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation, certain impacts of the Project were found
to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or
the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas
were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study, and were not
analyzed in the Draft EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural Resources; (C) Biological Resources,
with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (D) Cultural Resources,
with the exception of those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (E) Geology and Soils;
(F) Hazardous and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality, with the exception of
those potential impacts noted in Section 4 below; (H) Land Use and Planning; (I) Mineral
Resources; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Recreation; and (M) Utilities.
IV. Effects Not Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Less Than Significant, and Will
Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation
A general biological resources assessmenUfield study was- conducted as part of the
Initial Study to aid in the determination that the following issue areas would result in a less than
significant impact. However, there still remains the potential for a significant impact to result to
the following issue areas. As a result, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the
Project to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant.
A. Biological Resources
Burrowing Owl
The Project site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously used for
agricultural purposes. Because of this, there is a lack of suitable habitat on the Project site and
no probability for the occurrence of any sensitive species except with regard to the burrowing
owl. Although the probability of the occurrence of the burrowing owl is low, the EIR has
identified a mitigation measure to ensure any potential impact remains less than significant.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifcally, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
BIO-1: A precondition survey for the burrowing owl is required to confirm
presence or absence of the species on the proposed project site. The pre-construction survey
for the burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to the commencement of grading
activities. If it is determined that the project site is occupied by this species, Mitigation
Measure BIO-1 shall apply. Conversely, if the project site is not occupied, Mitigation Measure
BIO-2 shall not be required.
1 1231-0001 U 031054v3.doc
P189
BIO-2: Any western burrowing owls identified on site shall be relocated
prior to the commencement of grading activities. The relocation of any specimen shall be
conducted per applicable California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) procedures. Relocation of on-site burrowing owls shall not
be permitted during the nesting season for this species.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
Currently, the northwest and center portions of the proposed project site
provide marginally suitable habitat for the burrowing owl. Although a Field Study was conducted
as part of the Initial Study, apre-construction survey for the owl is required to confirm the
presence or absence of the owl from the site to avoid impacts to any owl(s). Vegetation in these
areas is low to moderate in height and interspersed with debris piles, thus providing a potential
for owl occupancy. Vegetation within the northeastern portion consists of remnant vineyards,
overgrown with ruderal vegetation. This portion of the project site would provide marginally
suitable habitat as well, should conditions change (i.e., with vegetation removal). The burrowing
owl is a mobile species; therefore, apre-construction survey is required to ensure no impact to
burrowing owls that may occupy the proposed project site. With the implementation of
Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less
than significant.
Raptors
The Project site contains a few large ornamental trees which could be suitable
roosting or nesting trees for raptors. During the field survey conducted as part of the biological
resources assessment conducted as part of the Initial Study, no nest for raptors were observed.
However, because raptors are mobile and there is the possibility that nests may have been
established during the period since the Initial Study, there is the potential for a significant
impact. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure articulated below, any impact will be
reduced to less than significant levels.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
BIO-3: Any large trees on site shall be removed between September 1
and January 31, outside of the typical nesting season for raptors. If vegetation removal is to
take place during the breeding/nesting season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), then pre-
construction nest surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that active nests
are protected. The last survey day shall be scheduled three days prior to the start of
construction work. If nesting birds are found, a qualified biologist shall be consulted regarding
the relocation or extent of the buffer area around those nesting areas.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
Because any raptor nests in the trees located on the project site may
have been established after the Initial Study field survey, there is the potential for a significant
impact with regard to raptors. However, with the incorporation of the above identified mitigation
11231-0001\1031054v3.doc
P190
measure, any impact will be reduced to a less than significant level. The mitigation measure
specifies the pre-construction nest surveys shall be conducted, and that removal of trees shall
be limited to the period outside the nesting season for raptors. Further, the mitigation measure
requires that a qualified biologist be contacted if raptor nests or nesting birds are located.
These measures will ensure a less than significant impact.
B. Cultural Resources
1. Archeological Resources
There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the Project
site. Further, through compliance with Senate Bill 18 which requires notification of the Project to
potentially affected Native American Tribes, only one Tribe responded indicating that there was
no knowledge of any specific cultural or sacred resources on the site. Nevertheless, the
potential to uncover an archeological resource may be present.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
CUL-1: In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of
grading or construction of the project, ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find shall
be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archeologist
(meeting Secretary of Interior Standards). Any such resource uncovered during the course of
project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City
and/or State regulations.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
Although the site is located in a developed area where significant ground
disturbance has occurred, the potential may still exist to uncover an archeological resource.
With the incorporation of the above identified mitigation measure, any impact to an
archeological resource will be less than significant. Specifically, if any archeological resource is
found, any ground-disturbing activities will be relocated and a qualified archeologist will be
consulted. Further, the archeological resource will be recorded and/or removed per City and
State regulations. This will ensure that any impact is reduced to a less than significant level.
2. Paleontological Resources
The project site is located in an area containing extensive existing development.
The development of the existing roadway, curbs, sidewalks, infrastructure, and nearby
structures would have required a large amount of ground disturbance that would have likely
resulted in the discovery of or destruction of existing paleontological resources. While there
have been no paleontological resources recorded within the City and the project area has
previously been disturbed, the potential to uncover a paleontological resource may still be
present.
a. Findings
4
11231-0001\1031054r3.doc
P191
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
CUL-2: In the event that paleontological resources are encountered
during construction excavation, the project proponent shall halt excavation in the vicinity of the
discovery and call a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find and make
recommendations for further mitigation.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, any potential
impact on paleontological resources will be less than significant. The measure will ensure that
any excavation of the Project site will be halted when paleontological resources are
encountered and that a qualified paleontologist be consulted, thereby ensuring a less than
significant impact.
C. Hydrology and Water Quality
1. Structures Other than Residential in 100-year Flood Hazard Area
Because a portion of the Project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard
area, and because a small portion of Hermosa Avenue (adjacent to the Project site) is prone to
flooding, there is the potential for a significant impact to result. However, with the
implementation of the identified mitigation measures, any potential impact will be less than
significant.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western
approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit and receive approval from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") a Conditional Letter of Map Revision -Fill
(CLOMR-F) to remove property from the 100-year flood zone map.
HYD-2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the western
approximately five acres, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
supporting evidence of compliance with FEMA CLOMR-F specifications and requirements
including the discussion and analysis of fill material placement, elevation changes, and hydro-
modification impacts.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRMS) identify areas subject to 100-year flooding. An area along Hermosa
Avenue is shown within the 100-year flood hazard area on the FIRMS. The conceptual plan for
11231-000]\1031054v3.doc
P192
the western portion of the project site includes commercial, office space, and a restaurant. The
structures associated with the western portion of the project site may fall within the 100-year
flood hazard area. Proper storm drainage facilities shall be constructed on the project site as
part of the drainage plans to be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and City
Engineer. Implementation of the features and facilities contained in the approved drainage plan
will help to ensure that impacts associated with flooding or redirection of flood water flows are
less than significant. In addition, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD-1 and
HYD-2, impacts related to this issue would be reduced to less than significant.
V. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to Be Insignificant
A. Noise Impacts
Certain noise impacts were studied in the EIR and found to be less than significant.
Specifically, noise construction associated with groundbourne vibration was determined to be
less than significant, as was the potential for the Project to expose people in the Project area to
excessive noise levels based on the proximity to an airport. Further, the Project is not
anticipated to cause excessive off-site traffic noise impacts. Although these noise impacts were
found to be less than significant, other noise impacts, as articulated below, were found to be
significant requiring mitigation.
B. Air Quality Impacts
Certain air quality impacts were studied in the EIR and also found to be less than
significant. Specifically: (1) the proposed Project is consistent with the most recent Air Quality
Management Plan; (2) the Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to
construction emissions, with the exception of fugitive dust articulated below; (3) the Project will
have a less than significant impact with regard to operational emissions; (4) the proposed
Project will have a less than significant impact with regard to exposing sensitive receptors to
pollutant concentrations from architectural coatings; (5) the proposed Project will not impose
short-term health risk impacts on sensitive receptors; and (6) the proposed Project will not
create objectionable odors.
VI. Effects Studied in the EIR But Which Have the Potential to Become Significant,
But Will Remain Insignificant Through Mitigation
A. Air Quality
Fugitive Dust Emissions
The proposed Project is not anticipated to have a significant impact with regard
to construction related fugitive dust emissions. Nevertheless, to ensure this impact remains less
than significant, mitigation measures have been identified.
Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
11231-0001\I031054e3.doc
P193
4.1.1A During project construction the construction contractor shall
implement the following measures to reduce fugitive dust.
(A) Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
(B) All excavating and grading operations shall be
suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous
gusts) exceed 25 mph.
(C) All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil
materials are carried to adjacent streets
(recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water).
(D) Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit
unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks
and any equipment leaving the site each trip.
(E) All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as
feasible, watered periodically or chemically
stabilized.
(F) The area disturbed by clearing, grading,
earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be
minimized at all times.
4.1.18 The construction contractor shall select the construction
equipment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all
construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications.
4.1.1C The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible.
4.1.1D The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog
season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended,
thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4.1.1 E The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so
as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes
adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to
existing roadways.
4.1.1E The construction contractor shall support and encourage
ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
7
11231-0001\1031054v3.doc
P194
Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and
exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during
construction varies substantially on aproject-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity,
the specific operations, and weather conditions at the time of construction. The project is
required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust
be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not
remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition,
SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive
dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403
are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the
fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM10 component). Compliance with these rules would
reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. The following are the applicable Rule 403
Measures:
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers'
specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas
inactive for 10 days or more).
• Water active sites at least twice daily. (Locations where grading is to
occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving).
• All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be
covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard in accordance
with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114
(freeboard means vertical space between the top of the load and top of
the trailer).
• Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the
main road.
• Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 mph or less
Additional dust suppression measures in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are
included as Mitigation Measures 4.1.1A through 4.1.1F to ensure that impacts remain less
than significant. In sum, through compliance with Rule 402 and 403 as well as the additional
measures incorporated as mitigation measures, this impact will be less than significant.
VII. Effects Studied in the EIR and Found to be Significant, But Reduced to a Level of
Insignificance Through Mitigation
The following impacts were analyzed in the EIR and found to be significant. However,
with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, these impacts will be reduced to a
level of insignificance.
The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in
the Final EIR (and below) would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level.
A. Noise
Interior Noise Levels
11231-0001\1031054v3.doc
P195
The analysis in the EIR demonstrates that construction of the proposed project
would result in noise levels at the on-site proposed residences exceeding the maximum noise
level allowed.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
4.2.1A Residential units located within 358 feet of the centerline of
Foothill Boulevard shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning
system. Second-story balconies or decks on these units with a line-of-sight to Foothill
Boulevard would require an additional 6-foot-high wall. In addition, any ground-level outdoor
uses, such as patios or park/recreation areas with aline-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard and within
358 feet of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, shall be equipped with a sound wall or sound
wall/berm combination with an effective height of 8 feet.
4.2.1 B Residential units located within 90 feet of the centerline of Center
Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system.
4.2.1C For the possible commercial/retail use on the western 5-acre
parcel, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.).
4.2.1D For the possible restaurant use on the western 5-acre parcel,
restaurant deliveries shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) unless the
proposed on-site residences will be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air
conditioning system.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed residential uses would potentially be exposed to high traffic
noise from Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, mitigation measures are required to ensure that the
sensitive receptor locations are not exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the City's
standards. Whether or not a specific apartment building is subject to the established mitigation
measures depends on the building's location within the project.
For residential units within the project site, the implementation of the
proposed mitigation measures would result in the construction of sound walls and mechanical
ventilation. The sound walls would provide a 5 to 7 dBA or more in noise reduction for ground-
floor receptors. With a combination of walls, doors, and windows, standard construction for
southern California residential buildings would provide more than 20 dBA in exterior-to-interior
noise reduction with windows closed and 12 dBA with the windows open. However, with
windows open, there is a potential for interior noise on the ground floor units to exceed the 45
dBA Ltl„ standard (i.e., 63 dBA - 12 dBA = 51 dBA). Therefore, the implementation of
Mitigation Measure 4.2.1A would be required to ensure that windows can remain closed for a
prolonged period of time. Further, with the implementation of all the identified mitigation
measures, noise levels would be reduced to a level that would be consistent with the City's
General Plan noise standards. Therefore, impacts associated with this issue would be mitigated
to level that is considered to be less than significant.
9
]1231-0001\10310>4v3.doc
P196
2. Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts
Construction noise impacts resulting from the proposed Project will be potentially
adverse requiring mitigation.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the signifcant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
4.2.2A The construction contractor shall implement the following
mitigation measures during project construction. Construction will be limited to the hours of 6:30
a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, in accordance with City standards. No
construction activities are permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays.
4.2.26 The project contractor shall place all stationary construction
equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project
site.
4.2.2C The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in
areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and
noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
4.2.2D During all site excavation and grading, the project/ construction
contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and
maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
Noise levels from demolition, grading, and other construction activities for
the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA Lmax at the closest residential uses to the north of
the project site for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction noise
impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse.
Typical noise levels range up to 91 dBA Lmax at 50 feet during the noisiest
construction phases. The site preparation phase, which includes site excavation and grading,.
tends to generate the highest noise levels, because the noisiest construction equipment is
earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as
backfillers, dozers, draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment
includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of
construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full-power operation followed by 3 to 4
minutes at lower-power settings.
Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of
earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. Noise typically associated with the use
of construction equipment is estimated between 79 and 89 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet
from the construction effort for the grading phase. This equipment would be used on site. Each
dozer would generate a maximum of 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, and water and pickup trucks would
generate approximately 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal
10
11231-OOOI\1031054v3.doc
P197
strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction
equipment operates as an individual noise source, the worst-case composite noise level during
this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from an active
construction area. As these noise sources are point sources, the noise decreases at a rate of 6
dB per doubling of distance.
The nearest residences are located to the north of the project site along
Stafford Street. These residences are approximately 25 feet from the project boundary and may
be subjected to short-term noise reaching 97 dBA Lmax intermittently generated by construction
activities on site. Additionally, demolition of the existing buildings on the western 5-acre parcel
may occur after the project apartments are occupied; however, these will be no closer than the
existing residences. This level of noise is comparable with vehicular traffic noise on Foothill
Boulevard. Construction-related noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially
adverse; however, with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the impact would be
reduced to a less than significant level. To minimize the impact of the construction noise on
residences adjacent to the project area, compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance
would be required.
Because Construction of the proposed project would result in noise levels
at the closest residences exceeding the maximum noise level allowed, the above identified
mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level.
More specifically, by limiting construction hours, using noise mufflers on construction
equipment, and placing construction equipment and staging areas away from residential uses,
this significant impact will be mitigated to a less than significant level.
Long Term Operational Noise Impacts
The EIR found that the proposed Project would cause a substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise levels associated with long-term operations of the proposed Project.
This significant impact will be reduced to a less than significant level with the imposition of
mitigation measures.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measures have been imposed to mitigate any
potential impacts to less than significant levels:
4.2.3A For any commercial/retail use located directly adjacent to a
residential use, delivery truck activity shall be restricted to daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:00
p.m.).
4.2.3B In the event that the on-site residential uses are constructed and
occupied prior to the scheduled demolition of the tire shop, a 6-foot-high wall surrounding the
tire shop will be required in order to reduce impacts on adjacent residential uses to a less than
significant level.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
11
11231-0001\10310S4v3.doc
P198
Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would be associated
primarily with operations at the on-site commercial uses. These commercial uses would
generate noise from truck delivery, loading/unloading activities, and other activities at the
parking lot. These activities are potential point sources of noise that could affect noise-sensitive
receptors adjacent to the loading areas, such as the proposed residential uses on site.
For example, there is an auto tire shop located on the project site near
the center of the Foothill Boulevard frontage that would project noise to the surrounding
proposed residences. This business is scheduled to be removed; however, it is possible it will
continue operation for some period after the apartment portion of the project is built. Noise
sources from the auto tire shop include customer-generated noises as well as noises associated
with auto services, such as pneumatic drills, hydraulic lifts, and other machinery or equipment
typically used in such operations.
It is anticipated that the closest project residences will be located no less
than 100 feet from the auto service area. Peak noise levels associated with the auto service
activities would range up to 80 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Noise attenuation from a point source will
drop off at 6 dBA per doubling of the distance, resulting in a noise reduction of 6 dBA at 100 feet
from the source. Therefore, the homes 100 feet from these auto service activities would
experience noise levels up to 74 dBA Lmax. This range of maximum noise levels is lower than
the- daytime exterior noise standards of 75 dBA Lmax; however, even with windows closed, it
exceeds the daytime interior noise standards of 45 dBA Lmax. A 6-foot-high concrete masonry
wall surrounding the tire shop would provide a minimum of 6 dBA in noise attenuation to the
nearby residences, thus reducing the daytime interior noise levels to below the standard (80
dBA - 6 dBA - 24 dBA - 6 dBA = 44 dBA). It is assumed that the auto service operations do
not occur after 10:00 p.m.
Further, delivery trucks for the anticipated on-site office/retail/restaurant
uses would result in a maximum noise similar to noise readings from loading and unloading
activities for other projects, which generates a noise level of 75 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Based on
the site plan, the restaurant will be located in the southwest corner of the site, more than 400
feet from the nearest proposed on-site residence and more than 600 feet from existing
residences to the north. Therefore, with the distance divergence, loading/ unloading noise
would potentially reach up to 57 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the
east and 53 dBA Lmax at the ground level of the nearest residences to the north. This potential
maximum noise level would not exceed the daytime exterior noise standard of 60 dBA;
however, it would exceed the nighttime exterior 55 dBA LZ5 standard at the nearest proposed
on-site residence if the noise lasts more than 15 minutes in any hour. Although a typical truck
unloading process takes an average of 15-20 minutes, this maximum noise level occurs in a
much shorter period of time, (i.e., in a few minutes). As long as the maximum noise level occurs
in a time period less than 15 minutes in any hour, a nighttime exterior 60 dBA Li, standard will
not be exceeded. Therefore, noise associated with loading and unloading activities at the
restaurant would not result in noise levels exceeding either the daytime or nighttime exterior
standards at the nearest residences to the north or the east.
Standard building construction in southern California would provide 24
dBA or more in noise reduction from exterior to interior with windows and doors closed and 12
dBA or more with windows and doors open. With windows closed, the maximum interior noise
attributable to the restaurant loading/unloading activities would be reduced to 33 dBA Lmax. With
windows open, it would be reduced to 45 dBA Lmax. Thus, only with windows open could the
12
1 123 1-00010 03 1 054v3.doc
P199
nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax be exceeded. Therefore, the restaurant
deliveries must be restricted to daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.).
In sum, because the tire shop may operate for a time after the residential
units of the Project are constructed and occupied, Mitigation Measure 4.2.38 will be
implemented to reduce any potential significant impact to a less than significant level. Further
because the maximum interior noise attributable to the retail/office loading/unloading activities
would only be reduced to 41 dBA Lmax at the existing residences to the north (which exceeds the
nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA Lmax), Mitigation Measure 4.2.26 will be
implemented which will require delivery hours to be restricted ensuring the nighttime interior
noise standard will not be exceeded by the operations of the Project.
B. Traffic
Opening Year 2009 with Commercial Conditions Traffic and Level of
Service Impacts
The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Commercial
Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to
Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of
Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City
begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall
pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service
standard of D. With the addition of the commercial portion of project traffic to the year 2009
baseline scenario, the intersection level of service at the following intersection would result in
less than the minimum service standard:
Hermosa Avenue/Church Street. The intersection would result in
LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour.
As identified above, the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection is
forecast to exceed the satisfactory level of service of D in 2009 with the commercial conditions
of the project. However, in the 2009 without project scenario, the Hermosa Avenue/Church
Street intersection would also operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour which is an
unsatisfactory level of service, and at 2007 existing conditions, this P.M. peak hour is at LOS E.
However, because the forecast level of service at this intersection exceeds the minimum service
standard of D in the year 2009 plus commercial scenario, a significant impact will result.
13
11231-0001\1031054v3.doc
P200
To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street
intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure
shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa
Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Commercial Conditions
will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance.
2. Opening Year 2009 with Residential Project Conditions Traffic and Level
of Service Impacts
The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Residential
Conditions of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result with regard to
Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of
Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City
begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall
pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development.
Facts in Support of Findings
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service
standard of D. With the addition of the residential portion of the project traffic to the year 2009
baseline scenario, the intersection levels of service at the following intersection would result in
less than the minimum service standard:
Hermosa AvenuelChurch Street. The intersection would operate
at LOS F conditions in the P.M. peak hour.
However, even without the project (i.e., with just the 2009 baseline), the'
above intersection would operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour, which is an
unsatisfactory level of service. Further, at existing 2007 conditions, the P.M. peak hour LOS
level is at LOS E. Impacts to this intersection are considered a significant impact of the
proposed project.
To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street
intersection is reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure
shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa
Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Residential Conditions will
be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance.
3. Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project (Residential and Commercial)
Traffic and Level of Service
14
1 1231-000 ]U 031054v3.doc
P201
The EIR examined traffic impacts at Opening Year 2009 with Entire Project
(Residential and Commercial) of the Project and determined that a significant impact will result
with regard to Hermosa Avenue/Church Street intersection.
a. Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the
EIR. Specifically, the following mitigation measure has been imposed to mitigate any potential
impacts to less than significant levels:
4.3.1A The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of
Hermosa Avenue and Church Street with Transportation Fee Credits. In the event that the City
begins construction of the traffic signal prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall
pay the City Transportation Fee in accordance with the number of units in the development.
b. Facts in Support of Findings
With the addition of the entire project (commercial and residential) traffic
to the year 2009 baseline scenario, the level of service at the following intersection would result
in less than the minimum service standard of LOS D:
Hermosa Avenue/Church Street would operate at LOS F
conditions in the P.M. peak hour.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set a minimum level of service
standard of D. The level of service deficiency at the Hermosa Avenue and Church Street
intersection is also forecast to occur in the year 2009 without the project; thus, the project would
not produce the LOS deficiency by itself. Nonetheless, the project does contribute to the level
of service deficiencies, resulting in a significant impact, and mitigation is required.
To ensure that potential impacts to the Hermosa Avenue/Church Street
intersection are reduced to less than significant levels, the above articulated mitigation measure
shall be put in place. With these improvements, the P.M. peak hour LOS level for the Hermosa
Avenue/Church Street intersection operating under 2009 Project with Entire Project Conditions
will be reduced to LOS C and will be fully mitigated to a level of insignificance.
VIII. Project Alternatives
A. Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in the EIR.
The City considered a range of reasonable alternatives as more fully discussed in the
EIR. Some of these alternatives were rejected outright and were not analyzed in the EIR
because they would not fulfill the basic project objectives. This range included: (1) No Build
Alternative; (2) the Business Office Alternative; and (3) the Residential Portion of the Project
Alternative.
With regard to the No Build Alternative, no development would take place on the site,
and the project site would be retained in its current condition. The existing tire shop,
residences, strawberry fields, and commercial uses would remain on the property. Disallowing
development of the site, as suggested by this alternative, would impose conditions that conflict
15
11?31-0007\1031054v3.doc
P202 .
with the existing vision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the site and the project area. The
No Build Alternative does not represent the highest or best use of the site. Furthermore,
retention of the project site in its current condition would not fulfill the primary objectives of the
proposed project and would not provide residential development that is attainable for low and
moderate income segments of the community or augment the City's economic base by
increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City: The substantial economic and land use
benefits derived from the development of the proposed project would be forfeited.
Consequeritly, the No Build Alternative was rejected from further consideration in the EIR.
With regard to the Business Office Alternative, the Business Office Alternative consists
of the development of the project site entirely with office uses. The development of the entire
site with such uses would not provide the varied retail, residential, and service uses associated
with the proposed project. Additionally, the development of office uses would not provide the
additional municipal revenues expected to be generated from the proposed project; nor would it
provide residential development that is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the
community. Thus, this alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City
objectives for development of the project site.
Third, the Residential Portion of the Project Alternative would only consist of the
development of 166 apartments that are proposed as part of the project. The office and
commercial portions would not be developed as part of this alternative. The development of a
portion of the site with residential uses would not provide the varied retail and service uses
associated with the proposed project. Similar to the alternative for office uses, the development
of apartments alone would not provide the additional municipal revenues expected to be
generated from the proposed project; nor would it bring new revenue-generating uses in the
City. Additionally, the development of the residential portion alone would fail to achieve the
objectives of the proposed project, in particular including promotion of "balanced, efficient
development that is functional, safe, attractive and convenient to users, and which will
strengthen the local economy," and providing "additional jobs to the local economy." This
alternative was rejected because it would not provide the basic City objectives for development
of the project site.
B. Alternatives Analyzed in the EIR.
The EIR however did undertake an analysis of three other potential project alternatives.
These three alternatives were also rejected for the various reasons stated below.
1. No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative
a. Summary of Alternative
The No Project Alternative assumes what would reasonably be expected
to occur, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community
services, in the foreseeable future. The project site is currently zoned Community Commercial
and designated for General Commercial uses. Given the goals and objectives of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the continuing trend of infill development in the project area, it is highly
reasonable in the event the proposed project were not approved, that the site would be
developed with some type of commercial use. Within the Commercial zone, uses including
offices, retail commercial, and general services are allowed. With the No Project Alternative,
development of a retail commercial use is assumed at a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 25
percent, allowing up to 185,000 square feet of commercial floor space.
16
11231-0001\1031054v3.doc
P203
b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
With the No Project, Existing Zoning Alternative, the project site is
assumed to be developed with a cdmmercial use consistent with the City's General Plan and
Zoning. With this alternative, significant unavoidable air quality impacts would occur that do not
occur with the proposed project. In addition, impacts related to aesthetics, traffic, and noise
would be increased over those of the proposed project. The No Project, Existing Zoning
Alternative has been rejected because it would have greater impacts to air quality, noise, and
traffic than the proposed project. In addition this alternative would not meet all of the City's
objectives, which includes the failure of the alternative to "provide residential development that
is attainable for low and moderate income segments of the community."
2. Reduced Intensity Alternative
a. Summary of Alternative
Under this alternative, the project site would be developed with
approximately 75 percent of the residential, commercial, office, and restaurant uses envisioned
under the proposed project. This alternative would result in 125 apartment units, a 3,750-
square foot restaurant, an 18,750-square foot office building, and 12,000 square feet of retail
shops.
b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
With the Reduced Intensity Alternative, visual resource impacts would be
similar. Impacts related to short-term construction-related air quality and noise impacts would
be reduced although similar to those identified with the proposed project. Further, long-term air
quality operational emissions under this alternative would remain less than significant, although
reduced in magnitude. Because of the reduction in vehicle trips achieved under this alternative,
impacts to the operation of local roadways and intersections would be proportionally reduced
from the proposed project. Under this alternative, the proposed project objectives are met,
although to a lesser degree. Reducing the amount of commercial square footage would
decrease the amount of revenue forecast to be generated by the proposed project. This
Reduced Intensity Alternative has been rejected, because it limits employment opportunities by
limiting commercial and office square footage and housing opportunities would be decreased
when compared to the proposed project.
3. All Residential Project Alternative
a. Summary of Alternative
With the All Residential Alternative, development of apartment units
similar to those in the proposed project would occur. This alternative assumes that the existing
restaurant on the southeastern 1.5-acre corner of the project (the Whole Enchilada) would
remain. Residential apartment uses would take place on 15.54 acres of the site and would be
developed at the same density as the proposed project with 15.75 units per acre, resulting in
245 apartment units. This alternative would result in the same removal of all other existing uses
on the property as the proposed project.
b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
17
1123]-0001\1031054v3.doc
P204
With the All Residential Project Alternative, potential impacts associated
with short-term construction related air quality and noise impacts would remain similar to those
identified with the proposed project. Impacts related to traffic operations would be proportionally
reduced in relation to the reduction in trip generation between the All Residential Project
Alternative and the proposed project. The volume of pollutants emitted during operation of the
project under this alternative would.be reduced and would be less than significant. The change
in the vehicle noise achieved under this alternative would not be perceptible. With the reduction
of traffic resulting from the development of the All Residential Project Alternative, air emissions
and noise levels would be correspondingly reduced; however, the significance of air, noise, and
traffic impacts would remain similar to those of the proposed project and would be less than
significant. New housing opportunities would be created with the additional residential
apartments planned for this alternative, however, the absence of retail uses from the project site
would most likely reduce (sales tax) revenue to the City and therefore not meet all project
objectives.
4. Off Site Alternative
a. Summary of Alternative
The Off-Site Location Alternative analyzes the impacts of the proposed
project in a different location. This alternative would be composed of the same intensity and the
same uses in an alternative location. An alternative site would require adequate land, access,
and services, and must be compatible with adjacent uses. The selected location for the off-site
alternative is southeast of the proposed project, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and
Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This site is currently zoned for industrial park
uses and is approximately 17 acres.
b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
The Off-Site Alternative would have similar impacts to the proposed
project in all impact areas with the exception of Hydrology and Water Quality which would be
reduced. The Off-Site Alternative is not in a redevelopment area and does not meet the City's
objective of locating development in infill and redevelopment areas that will minimize any
potential environmental impacts and therefore has been rejected.
Environmentally Superior Alternative
The EIR has identified the Reduced Intensity Alternative as the environmentally
superior alternative. However, because this alternative would meet the project objectives to a
lesser degree than the proposed Project, the alternative has been rejected. More specifically, it
limits employment opportunities by limiting commercial and offce square footage and housing
opportunities would be decreased when compared to the proposed project.
C. The Project As Proposed
Summary of Project
The Project is described in detail in the EIR.
2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed
18
11?31-0001VI031054v3.doc
P205
The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts
of the Alternatives described in the EIR and has compared it with those of the proposed Project.
The City Council finds that the various Alternatives are infeasible for various environmental,
economic, technical, social, or other reasons as discussed above. The City Council further finds
that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interests of the
public and achieve the project goals.
More specifically, the proposed Project locates development within the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency project area designated for redevelopment, and as
analyzed in the FEIR, minimizes any potential environmental effects. The proposed Project also
provides 166 apartment units as workforce housing. Further, the proposed Project will make
use of the availability of existing public improvements by locating the Project in a developed
area, thereby providing maximum benefit to the general public. The proposed Project also will
help augment the City's economic base by increasing tax-generating retail uses within the City
with the addition of 16,000 square feet of retail shops, and a 5,000 square foot restaurant.
Finally, the proposed Project will be an example of balanced, efficient development that is
functional, safe, attractive, and convenient to residents and other users, and will strengthen the
local economy by the addition of 25,000 square feet of office space, as well as retail and
restaurant uses. For all of these reasons, the City Council has selected the proposed Project.
19
1 1231-0001 U 031054v3. doc
P206
ZONING MAP - EXISTING
0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles
EXHIBIT B-1
P207
ZONING MAP - PROPOSED
0.06 0 0.06 0.12 Miles
EXHIBIT B-2
rn
x
W
00
W
w
N
J
N
O
au
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
LR, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LMFi LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
MR._ MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL
MASTER PLMI APPROVED
PURSUNJT'TO
DRC4603-01036
APRa ia. zow
Cd M fVi ERCIAL
SG SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL.
CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
RRG REGIONAL.RELATED GOMMERCIAL.
*, MASTER PLAN APPROVEb
PURSUANT TO
DRC 1006-00635, DRC2bOff'06636, 8 DRC2b06-b6633
FERRUPR Y'2006
OFFICE
MU MIXED USE
O OFFICE
CO GONIMERCIAUOFFICE
INDUSTRIAL
LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC
U UTILITY
P PUBLIC
'~+ MASTER PLAN AREA
LAND USE PLAN
A
~-
0
C7
0
0
a
m
~_
n
0
a
m
W
n
O'
V
W
N
O
W
O
N
O
SUBAREAS
P209
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.030
Land Use Mix Percent Range. Acreage Range
Medium-High Residential 0%- 100% 0 - 3.24 acres
Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres
The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity
as defined in Development Code Chapters 17.08 and 17.10. All uses that may be
authorized under the Office designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approval.
The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08 and .17.10, for
each permitted land use shall be applicable within the Mixed Use District.
2. Foothill Boulevard and' Haven Avenue Site: This 31.5 acre site is located on the
southwest oorner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The following table specifies
the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site:
Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range
High Residential 40% - 45% 12.6 -14.2 acres
Office 55% - 60% 17.3 - 18.9 acres
The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity
as defined in Development code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.30. .All uses and
activities that are permitted, or may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, under the
High Residential, Office/Professional, General Commercial, and Industrial Park
designations are subject to the same permitting processes and development standards
as listed in Chapters 17.06, 17.10, and 17.20, shall be applicable to any development
within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development
approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site.
3. Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonoa Channel Site: This 7.24-acre site is located at the base
of "Red Hill" on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel.
The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted
on the site.
Percent Acreage
Land Use Mix Range Range
Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres
8-14 dwellin units er acre "
Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres
The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character
and intensity as defned in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32. All
uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to a Conditional Use
Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08,
17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development
within the Mixed Use District."
• This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior
Housing Overlay District (SHOD).
EXHIBIT C 17.os-1o 2roa
P210
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.030
4. Haven, Church and Center Site: This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of
Church Avenue, between Center. and Haven Avenues. The following table specifies the
uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site.
Percent Acreage
Land Use Mix, Range Range
Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres
8-14 dwellin units er acre
Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.36 acres
The land use categories proposed within the Mixed 'Use area shall be of the character
and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, and 17.10. All uses
that may be authorized under office designations are subject to Development Code
Chapter 17.10. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17,08,
and 17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the
Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the
Planning Commission specifically for this site.
`This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre).
5. Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue Site: This 17-
acre site is located on the north side of Foothill BoulevaM between Hermosa
Avenue and Center Avenue. The following table specifies the uses and range of
development that may be permitted on the site.
Land Use Mix Percent
Range Acreage
Range
Medium/Medium High 0% - 62% 0 -10.54 acres
Residential
(Up to 20 dwelling units per
acre
Commercial -Retail, Office 0% - 100% 0 -17 acres
(commercial and professional),
and Restaurant
The land use categories propdsed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the
character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10,
and 17.32: All uses that may be authorized under the commercial designation are
subject to Development Code Chapter 17.32. The corresponding development
standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use
shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be
subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission
specifically for this site.
This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential
uses, which may include Multiple Family Residential land uses of up to 20 dwelling
units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements.
17.08-11 2/04
STAFF REPORT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Date: March 19, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager
P211
RANCHO
G'UCAMONGA
By: Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II
Subject: Resolution Supporting Healthy Cities Program in Rancho Cucamonga
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution
Healthy Cities model as a means of integrating healt
improving the overall quality of life in the community.
No. 08-069, declaring its support for the
h concerns into a holistic approach to
BACKGROUND
At its March 5`" Study Session, the City Council approved staff's recommended approach to
developing a Healthy Cities Program for Rancho Cucamonga and directed staff to bring back a
resolution formalizing the City's commitment to Healthy Cities initiatives.
The Healthy Cities model advocates a broad definition of health which includes a shared vision;
widespread community participation; system reform; collaborative partnerships; engaging local
resources; and a means to measure progress and base improvements upon results. The Healthy
Cities initiatives promote clean and safe places to live, work and play; a strong economy with
diverse and well paying jobs for everyone; good schools and opportunities for life-long learning;
accessible and affordable housing; opportunities to promote, support, and celebrate cultural
diversity, among other initiatives.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga currently does a significant amount to encourage healthy lifestyles.
The City has established policies and provides a number of programs to the community that are
consistent with the principles identified in the Healthy Cities model including its system of parks,
trails, and other recreational and cultural amenities; a variety of health and safety programs;
employee wellness programs and activities; enforcement of a variety of ordinances that promote
public health, including the recently adopted "Styrofoam" Ban and Smoking Ban ordinances. The
City is also in the process of developing new Healthy Cities-related policies and programs, including
a fitness program at the Pacific Electric Trail, walking program at Victoria Gardens, health series of
speakers at the libraries, integration of Healthy Cities principles into the General Plan update,
among others.
In an effort to further the development of a Healthy Cities Program in Rancho Cucamonga and
improve the overall quality of life in the community, the City has joined the California Healthy Cities
and Communities (CHCC) network which provides a means of affiliation with the Healthy Cities
P212
RESOLiIIYON SUPPORTING HEALTHY CITIES PROGRAM IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 2
MARCH 19, 2008
Program and the international Healthy Cities and Communities movement. CHCC is a statewide
initiative to assist cities and communities with developing, implementing and evaluating
inclusionary, community-driven programs, as well as policies and plans, which address
environmental, social and economic determinants of health.
The City recognizes the importance of a community atmosphere that promotes healthy living and
that such an effort must be broad in scope encompassing the total health -mind, body, and earth -
and well-being of all of its members. The attached resolution sets the foundation for developing a
Healthy Cities Program for Rancho Cucamonga designed to create a healthy environment and
promote healthy lifestyle choices.
Attachments:
- Resolution No. 08-069
- Healthy Cities Staff Report 3/5/08
P213
RESOLUTION NO. 08-069
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE
HEALTHY CITIES MODEL AND INDICATING INTENT TO
SUPPORT PARTICIPATION IN CALIFORNIA HEALTHY CITIES
AND COMMUNITIES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California identified the
development of a Healthy Cities Program for Rancho Cucamonga as one of its goals for 2008;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its March 5`h Study Session, stated its commitment to
the Healthy Cities initiatives and support of policies and programs that facilitate the. promotion of
healthier lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, has placed a high priority on improving the quality of life
for all citizens of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, such an effort must be broad in scope encompassing social, economic, and
environmental factors that support the well-being of all of its members; and
WHEREAS, the City has joined the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC)
Network which promotes clean and safe places to live, work and play; a strong economy with
diverse and well paying jobs for everyone; good schools and opportunities for life-long learning;
accessible and affordable housing; opportunities to promote, support, and celebrate cultural
diversity, among other initiatives; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to support and advance the
principles of the Healthy Cities model by:
Supporting the mission of the California Healthy Cities and Communities program of
improving the health status of California residents by increasing the use of the Healthy
Cities model for health promotion; and
Blending together the objectives of Healthy Rancho Cucamonga with the planning
resources of California Healthy Cities and Communities, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
will be able to enhance current programming and initiate new efforts to make Rancho
Cucamonga a healthy place to live, work, and play.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga declares its support for the Healthy Cities model as a means of integrating health
concerns into a holistic approach to improving the overall quality of life in the community and
intends to develop a Healthy Cities Program for Rancho Cucamonga.
P214
APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California this 19`h day of March, 2008.
BY:
Donald J. Kurth, M.D.,
Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
QTY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Date: March 5, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Fabian A. Villenas, Principal Management Analyst
Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II
Subject: Discussion of Healthy Cities Program in Rancho Cucamonga
P215
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Introduction
At its recent Goal Setting Workshop, the City Council identified the development of a Healthy Cities
Program as one of its goals for 2008. In response to City Council's direction, staff began compiling
information regarding Healthy Cities, conducted an internal audit of Healthy Cities-related programs
and amenities currently offered by the City, interviewed other cities with Healthy Cities Programs,
met with County of San Bernardino Healthy Communities Program staff, and began discussing this
concept with Hogle-Ireland, the City's General Plan consultant. The culmination of these efforts was
a multi-departmental staff workshop held on February 12"' to gather input regarding the Healthy
Cities concept. The information gathered from this workshop, as well as a recommendation to
implement a Healthy Cities Program in Rancho Cucamonga, will be presented to the City Council at
the March 5"' City Council Study Session.
Background
In response to growing concerns over rising obesity rates as well as rising type 2 diabetes and
cancer rates, especially in children, and the decline in physical activity, cities have become
increasingly conscious of promoting policies that engage their citizens in more activities that are
healthy, and consider community design that makes more parks available and streets that
encourage walking rather than relying on cars.
This increased awareness has led to collective efforts to promote a Healthy Cities concept where
communities serve as healthy places to live, work, and play. This concept includes access to
recreational amenities such as parks, trails, community centers, and sports facilities; access to
healthy foods; programs and classes that encourage fitness; information and education on fitness,
nutrition, and health; opportunities for personal growth, cultural diversity, and mental health; cultural
and literacy-related programs; safe and walkable neighborhoods; and plans and policies that
support healthy living. Part of the Healthy Cities concept includes understanding the relationship
between health-related factors, land use policies, and community planning as well as understanding
the long-term community benefits to be gained by encouraging healthy lifestyles. An unhealthy
community will have less productive school and work lives, higher medical expenses, and a
decreased quality of life.
P216
DISCUSSION OF HEALTHY QTIES PROGRAM IN RANQ-IO GUCAMONGA
MARCH 5.2008
PAGE 2
At the State level, the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) network was created for
groups interested in the principles and practices of healthy cities and communities. Rancho
Cucamonga recently joined this network which promotes a clean and safe place to live, work and
play; a strong economy with diverse and well paying jobs for everyone; good schools and
opportunities for life-long learning; accessible and affordable housing; among other initiatives. The
League of California Cities has also recognized the importance of the Healthy Cities concept by
adopting a resolution that, among other things, resolved that the League encourage cities to
"embrace policies that facilitate activities that promote healthier lifestyles, including healthy diet and
nutrition, and adopt city design and planning principles that enable citizens to undertake exercise
with the goal of achieving a more active and healthy community." The County of San Bernardino
Department of Public Health has also established a Healthy Communities Division to encourage
and support the development of Healthy Cities Programs within the County. A representative from
the County Division will be attending the March 5`h City Council Study Session.
Healthy Cities in Other Communities
Staff conducted informal interviews with surrounding cities to explore the details of each Healthy
Cities Program. The cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario, San Bernardino and Rialto have all either
implemented programs or are currently in the process of developing programs. Staff was interested
in program development, program focus, types of programs and services provided, community and
stakeholder involvement, staffing, and funding. A detailed sample of a few cities is attached for your
review. A brief overview of the cities of Chino and Fontana are detailed below.
Healthy Chino was originated from an existing community group, the Healthy Chino Coalition. The
Healthy Chino Program was adopted in December 2004 when City Council passed a resolution
endorsing the Healthy Cities concept and formal participation in the California Healthy Cities and
Communities network. Healthy Chino has evolved into awhole-person approach to health by
identifying the following five key focus areas: Fitness; Health and Human Services; Nutrition; Public
Education; Safe and Walkable Neighborhoods. Some of the programs and services provided
include various walking clubs, Health & Fitness Expo, healthy snacks, community garden, Farmers
Market, mental health services for residents, various recreation classes, Employee Wellness
Program (recreation classes, walking, weight loss reward program), Stairwell Employee Art
Program, Family Fitness Challenge, Healthy Chino website, Healthy Chino newsletter, and
incorporation of healthy components in the General Plan Update. The City initially hired a
consultant to facilitate the development of the program. Healthy Chino currently has one Part-time
Coordinator (35hrs/wk) and one Part-time Specialist (25hrs/wk) funded through the General Fund.
As a result of continuous program expansion, they are considering hiring one additional Part-time
Leader (20hrs/wk).
Healthy Fontana was originally a project that evolved into an official City program, spearheaded by
Councilwoman Acquanetta Warren. The Healthy Fontana campaign was officially launched in
January 2004. Healthy Fontana was created to inform, educate and change the way people eat,
exercise and live. It promotes programs that enrich the quality of life for residents by focusing on:
Nutrition -Smart Choices; Active Living -Exercise; Smart Growth - Building a Livable Community;
Community Partnerships -Working Together. Fontana offers the following programs and services:
healthy cooking classes, walking clubs, exercise bootcamps, exercise classes, sporting activities,
community gardening, health-a-thons, website with healthy tips and recipes, wellness program for
local businesses, and "The Health of it" Newsletter. The City initially hired a consultant to facilitate
the development of the program. Healthy Fontana currently has one Full-time Coordinator and one
P217
DISCUSSION OF HEALTHY CITIES PROGRAM IN RANQ-IO GUCAMONGA
MARCH 5, 2008
PAGE 3
Part-time Coordinator (30-35hrs/wk) funded through the General Fund. Fontana indicated that they
regularly use other recreation staff on an as needed basis and will likely hire additional staff as the
program continues to expand.
While each city's approach was unique, the following key elements were integral to their efforts:
commitment of local leadership, staffing, and resources; involvement of volunteers and community
partners; public awareness of the benefits of the program; and availability of skill-building
opportunities for participants. Given the opportunities and challenges inherent in this work, long-
term investments-policymaking, funding, staffing, and acquiring in-kind resources-are needed to
support planning, implementation, and evaluation. Community visioning and strategic planning
processes are additional opportunities to integrate this work.
Healthy Rancho Cucamonga
One of the initial steps of our efforts to look at Healthy Cities has been to identify existing City
programs, projects, activities, and amenities that are consistent with the Healthy Cities concept.
This internal audit demonstrated that Rancho Cucamonga provides a number of Healthy Cities
types of programs to the community and does a significant amount to encourage healthy lifestyles.
Our system of parks, trails, and other recreational and cultural amenities provided by the
Community Services and Library promote healthy lifestyle choices. Police and Fire offer a variety of
health and safety programs to the community. Building and Safety enforces a variety of ordinances
that promote public health; the recently adopted "Styrofoam" Ban and Smoking Ban ordinances will
further this effort as well. In addition to all of the programs offered to the community, Administrative
Services offers employee wellness programs and activities. A detailed summary list of these efforts
is attached for your review. Based on Council feedback from the Goal Setting Workshop, staff is
also in the process of developing new Healthy Cities-related programs including a fitness program
at the Pacific Electric Trail, walking program at Victoria Gardens, health series of speakers at the
libraries, among others.
From the extensive inventory of existing Healthy Cities-related programs, it is evident that a Healthy
Cities Program can address a wide range of areas and requires input from many sectors of local
government, private sector, and community. While the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides a
substantial amount of programs and amenities, and continues to add new ones, we have not
branded these as "healthy" and therefore not identified by the community as part of a formal
Healthy Cities Program.
The Healthy Cities Program was discussed by the City staff at a recent brainstorming workshop that
included representation from each department. Representatives from the County of San Bernardino
Healthy Communities Program, as well as representatives from Hogle-Ireland, the City's General
Plan Consultant, joined the discussion to serve as a resource. Staff examined the major
components that contribute to a Healthy City and considered how this concept can be achieved.
Staff was encouraged to think creatively and with no reservations while participating in the
discussions. The goal of this initial stage was to create as many ideas as possible. An inventory of
existing programs, projects and partners was generated and opportunities for program
enhancement were developed. The group also discussed long-term goals and potential projects
that could be implemented in a phased approach. The results from this brainstorming session have
been summarized and will be presented at the March 5`h City Council Study Session.
P218
DISCCISSION OF HEALTHY QTIES PROGRAM IN RANQ'IO CUCAMONGA
MARCH-15, 2008
PAGE 4
Staff will be presenting to the City Council a suggested approach for developing a Healthy Cities
Program for Rancho Cucamonga. This includes both short and longer-term actions that the City
can take to enhance the well being of the community. Staff recommends that the initial step be
comprised of a two-year action plan which would include branding and marketing the many existing
Healthy Cities-related programs and efforts previously identified under a Healthy Cities brand;
analyzing existing health data indicators related to Rancho Cucamonga; establishing expectations
and guiding principles for the program; utilizing technical assistance of various Healthy Cities-
related organizations; developing a community-wide clearinghouse; staffing to assist in the
development and management of the program; expanding partnerships and pursuing grant funding;
and establishing a policy framework for Healthy Cities in the General Plan.
At the culmination of the 2-year plan, staff would seek further Council direction for future action
which would include developing a 5-year Strategic Plan, providing a road map for the Healthy Cities
Program to improve the overall health of Rancho Cucamonga's population. The plan would include
establishing along-term Healthy Cities strategy, conducting a community health needs assessment,
developing measurable goals, developing a comprehensive marketing strategy, establishing and
expanding additional partnerships in the community, and seeking major funding sponsorships and
grants. At the end of the five years, Council and staff would re-evaluate the program and determine
future direction of the Healthy Cities Program. Another City Council Study Session is scheduled for
April 2nd to discuss the City's sustainability "green" efforts, and possibly linking it to the Healthy
Cities efforts.
In summary, the efforts thus far have provided a foundation for operationalizing the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Healthy Cities Program. By introducing a visible, cohesive Healthy Cities Program, the
City can encourage its residents to lead an active lifestyle and further contribute to making Rancho
Cucamonga a healthy place to live, work, and play.
Attachments:
- Overview of Current City of Rancho Cucamonga Healthy Cities Related Efforts
- California Healthy Cities and Communities Overview
- Healthy Chino Overview
- Healthy Fontana Overview
- Healthy Ontario Overview
ca
c
0
E
ca
v
V
O
t
V
C
L
L
a
N
^~
.~
A
t
2
~ O
~ N
._
V
0
V
A
U
r
t
V
L
L
L
~+
C
0
.~
V
1- j Q
_ ~~ ~o~
~: ~ ~ o
;, , ~~~
U
L
U
O
U
~~
~_ ~
.~ ~
~~
U
o~
~ ?'
-~ ~
~~
~~
~~
~L
(~ ~
~ U
~~
~~
>~
^~
^~ W
W
U~
~_~
}~ (^n'
^ `~ /f
W O
2~
.~ j
~ O
L
•--r
~ ~
~_
U ~
C
~ O
O Q
~ .~''
O ~
~~
oa
a
c~
~ a~
~~
o •-_
~ ~U
~~
~~
~~
U~
ca ~
.~ ~U
~_ .O
•~ W
U~
o~
~~
_ ~ ~+
U Q~
Q~
O
~vU
,~ o ~
o s
c~
~'oc
~.
~ ~~ ~~
~-~
~0 ~
~- ~ ~
~~o
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
c~ o U
~ U ~-
L
-i--+
T~
^~' 1
W
~= o
o c~ ~.
~
~ ~~
^
1
A
W O ~~
~~~ U~
N ~ ~ N ~
L~~
` ~~
HU
~ HN
^c
W
O
a~
N
W
U
~_ ~ O
0 ~ ~L O
~
~ U O ~
I I I I
~
c~
ML
W
•.
V N
~
..
t C
~ ~
~ O
.
_ V
zs
~°o
~~
~aU
O
__
~~
U ~
_O ~
~~
O ~
t~
~~
~ O
~~
U ~,
~~
~ ~
N ~
U
~ O
~ U
~ >
O ~
~ Q
> .~
o
~ ~--+
._ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~~
a~ ~
~ O
C~ ~
L
N
U
•- N
~ ~
O ~
O
U `~
N O
~ ~
~ .~
~~
~_~
~U ~
O ~
- ~
U ~
• - t!1
a ~
~ O
~~
Q
> c~ ~
~~ ~ O
o~ ~
~ a~--+ ~ U
(~ ~ ~
~ ~ Q
~~~~
O O ~ o
._
~ ~ ~ L
O ~ O
~ ~ ~ I
•
O
~--~
U '
o
~
_
~
Q ~
~ ~
~ ~
U
_~ U
O O
~ ~
~ ~
._
~ ~
~ O
~
~
O O
~ ~
~ ~=
~ ~
Q ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
L ~ 'L ~ W
~ 'V p •- ~
~ ~ O
~ o ~ V
~ Q. o a~
L-
~ ~ ±-+
~'
~ •0 ~ ~
~, ~, O •~
o ° ~ = O
U ~ O O Q
I I I ~ ~
.
•
0
N
L
L
a
~~
z
U ~o
~~
~c~
N
~ ~
~ ~, ~
~
4
:- -
C6 ~ ~
.
~
~ L .
~ ~
N ~ ~~
L O~
-
. ~
~ ~ ~ •-
U
~ o~
~ ~ ~
~
~
o ~ _
~-'
~
v ~ ~ ~
o ~~
o
~ f
L
~
~
o
~ cn .
}~
~ O
. ~ .
~
~ •- ~
~~
o
U ~ ~
~
~j >+ o~
V
o
~
~~ O ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
~
~ ~
~O~
_
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
O ~ (~ L
~
~ ~ V~~
~ ~~~
00
~ _
.L •-
o ~ ~UU
o ~ .-a>,
N o ~~~
~ ~ ~~~
~ ~ ~c~c~
}, ~ O~~
Q ~ U==
U
O
a~
U
s
c~
a~
L
O
_~
C6
O
~
N
~ ~
~ O j ~
Q a~ ~
~~
~ V
~ ~
o
~
U ~
U ~ ~ ~~
cn -
~,
~ ~
- ~
o c~
o
~ Oa~
~
~ L o ~o
~~
_ -~
~
~_ ~ ~
~ }' ~~ Cam
~-_~ U ~ ~ ~
(~ - • -
L
~Q~~- n0
O~._ o~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ -
0
~ ~-
~ •-
~~ ~
~~
~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~~
~ _
~ U ~ ~ `~
~
~ ~
~ °
' ~~
c~
~
o
U >
~
a~ -
°:~
~U
. .
Q
t
L
f+
Cd.7
~ zs
U ~o
~~
~~U
0
0
N
N
3
L
.Q
~, O
~ ~
~_ ._
a~ ~
~o
L
~o
~
~
-~
~
~
~
~ O
~ O
N~
~ ~
~
^
``
L
W
~ Q
-1--
cn ~ U
•
a~
.~
C
X
0
~ ~
~ o
~~
o~
L
Q
~ ~
O }'
~ .X
~ ~
N ~
~ O
O
N
~-.+
U
(~
N
O
L
0
-~--+
O
U
C~
C~
C~
~ ~~
~= ~ U
~ U ~.
~ ~ O
-
o ~~
Q ~~
0
(~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
O ~
~ ~
~ ~U
~ •-
O
U~
•
O
0 ~
^ r L
0
. ~ O ~
~ ~ ~
O 0
~ ~ d. O
~ ~.O ~
~ -
~ N ~U~
.~.+ ~ o ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
-. (n `~=
V ~ a~ o
^~ L ~ _~ ~
L
>O•L a? ~ a
~ N~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O }, ..r to cn
~ ~ ~ N J ~ ~ ~
~, V o
^~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~= ~ ~ C
~ Q• ~~~ ~~a~~
~>
V Q~ L
~ ~~ ~ ~~ V ~ ~ ~ s U
~ ~ U •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c
~ ~ N U ' ~ Q ~
f~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p Q
N ~O ~ooC~w ~~~Uw
Q~~~ }' .
.~ ~ ~~
~~~ • •
~~
~~
oV
~--~ ~1
~T
2
U ~
~ ~
~ O
~ ~_
~~
~~
~o
o ~`
_^
~U
~~
~ a..r
C
N ~
~N
O .~
U
~ O
~~
O O
Q ~
Q (O
(a N to
L
~U(~~
~~~
~ U ~
o ~=
ca
U~.~
1- Q
v
-~~z~
U~o
.~ ~~
"~ . ~~~
N
O
~f ~
C W
~•• ~
~.
C
r~
N
N
L
C
o ~j
J C
~O
~a ~ N
~ '~O U ~ N
~ ~U
N ~ ~ .U ~
~ U W `~ c~
~ ~ ~ o a~
a~ -~
C~.c ~ ~ o
a? Q a c ~
~- c
~ ~ o ~ c~
U C N cn >,
.Q~ ~ ~ N O ~
W L ~ ~ O_ ~ ~
~ L O
~L C ~ ~ rr ~ U
L ~ J +-~
N ~ ~ ` .3
L _
~~ ALL c~ N
C~ ~ O ~ C
N~ C N C L ~ ~
~ ~ ~ U C ~ ~
N Q
N~ ~ M O U N N
N U ~ ~ >
~ U ~ = ~ ~ ~
(a L ~ ~ C N L
~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ N
.~ ±' N ~ ~ ~,~ C O
~ U w N N U O~ U
~_
U .
N
~~
C W
4~
1
^~
~~
V
~~
Z
z~
xo~
~~~
~~
.~
L
O
Q
U ~
C
~ Q
N ~
` ~
U ~~
LL
~
C N N ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
L ~
+r ~ C
- -
~U ~
~ N
~
~J ~ ~ O ~
~m ~ ~ ~ U
U~ N N
~ N Y ~
O ~
C
c V
~
v~
E
i o'
° o
~ ~
°~ o
=
a~ ~
F- v
a
c
~
`
o a
~ o_
. ~ ~ ~
~ ~
o c o c c~ c c~
2 2
~ ~ ~ (n (n Q (n
. .
i'
O
~ W
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
1J ~
0
~ ~
~ ~
.~
~V
.~I
~S
z
U ~o
~~
r~~
V
X
~ ~
o
U ~
L
N
~ °~
0
0 Q
cn
~ ~
~
Q o
N a~
rn
-v ca c
~
~ 3
N ~
~
~~
U
C
O ~ ~- .
~
N
~
~
V
~
N
j
~
~ ~
~
~
~ C U ~ ~ J'
N ~ ~ O N •~
O c a c v o ~- ~ U
c
O .~ 4=
(~ o
~ c
o
o
'
c~
~
t~ ~
, C
~ ~
-0
~ U
(~ +~
t0 ~
(Q
p
~ U ~ Q ~ ~ to ~ }'
L ~ C ~ ~ ~ C ~ fII
o U :~ o Z
~ ~ ~ U a. ~ 3 ~ U
~
~ ..r
~ a~
~ ~
o a~
~ o
:a
o
ai
~ U ~ ~- U c~ c~ 2 z
. .
~~
=_
'_ ,, ~
N
O
W
4~
c~
4~
4~
._
U
L
a+
d
N o
o a
o
~~ ~ ~
o_
o ~ ~ ~
~ L
~ ~ .~ ~ U ~ O ~ .~
Q1 Q L O ~ ~
O ~
J+ (.~ ~ N
N _ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ U (~
~ ~ V ~ U ~ .N N ~ m ~' ~
~ L~.~ a~V c~,~ ~
~ .•_. O co cn ~ c~ ~ ~ -
> ~ U ~ a- ~ U C ~ O ~ ~
w1U~Ui.~cnwU2cn0
. . . . . . . . . . . .
N
O
W
c~
z
x°o
~~ ~
~~
N
~
~
_
U ~
'
~ c
~ •-
2 ~
O ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
c~ N
a~
~ U
m ~,
o
U ~
C ~
N =
~ ~-' ~ N
"
C N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ U
~ a ,C
ca ~ N O
C ~ ~ ~ ;
~ ~ C ~
O ~ C ~ ~
N U ~ ~ ~
`
` N
L
O ~ O , ~
/~O p O C C
L N
~
L ~ Y ~--r U '
Q
~
Q
~ N • N
O _
N
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ C
~
~ ~
Z Z (!) C~ (~ ~ V7 (~
N
O
~~
C W
U
~~
z~
xoa
~~
~C~
C.~
a
L
C
AO N
W
N ~ O
~ O N
.~
C~ ~ ~ ~
c~ ~
~ vi o
.3 ~ p ~.
~ a~
~ ~ c ~~ ~
L
Q ~~ mY~~
C Q O O O
L
C ~
~ ~ Q O ~' I O
~ L O N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ > N c N
L ~ ~ ~ ~ L
L
^^''
~ ~ ~ O ~ O
c ~ ~ W m ~' ~ ca
a~
~ ~ ~ -a ~ Q.
_ ~ ~ c ~ J c ~
~~~~~~a~i°oEm
a~i a c`a o o° o ~ o ~
=c~mUm=~Uz
. .
.~
Q
L ~ (~
/~ ~ ~
~// ~ ~ ~
~ • - ~ -~ ~
~~ ~
~ ~ (~
~ ~ ._ ~
~ •~ ~ - V
~ ~ ~ ~
~~ U ~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~
•~ w ^~1 ~L ~_ .~
U W ~ ~ (n
~ ~ ~ p ~
~ ~ a~ ~ a~
~~
W ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~.v~ v ~ ~ ca ~
~ ~> ~ `~ ~
~ ~ ~.o ~ ~ ca W~
~~ ~
U~o
~U~ • • •
~U
~ • • •
L
~_
J
C
l.L
(~
U
0
J
0
~ ~
~ , ca
~~
L
U~
•
N
Q
d
a+
..
x
d
z
C7
oz
U ~o
~~ ~
~~
C
~--~
.~
O
c
ca
w
~~
.= ~ L
~~
V • ~ 0
Q
Q
•~
U
v /'~ ~
ice`/ ~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ (~
O ~~
U ~ ~
Q ~
~ ~ ~.
(a ~ O
~ > >
I
•
_~
~X
~-
O ~
C ~
~ ~
c~ ~
~ O
. U
~ ~
~ ~
~ U
M~
W W
~~
Ca
'x
0
.~
~,
U
(~
.~
Ca
.~
U
N
W
L
^~
W
L
C
(~
c
L
I..L
^L`
~W.r
L
Q
`~
U
.~
U
W
_~
a.
L
r~
V
0
N
N
.Q
Q
O
.~
[A~`]
/W\J
v /
~ /~~
V^/,
'W
•--+
~_+
a-~'+
(~
n~
^W
W
V
•
c
0
v
Q
s
a~
._
0
zs
o~
~~
~~~
a--~
~ ~ ~_
~~~~
Q~ ~ ~
~ O ~ >
~ QUO
~~ ~
.~ ~ .~ .~ ~
o}~'~°~~
U ~~~ ~
~.~~~~
~~~o~
0
UV~QU
~~~~~
~_ ~~ ~~
~~ ~•V ~_
~_+~.
~~~~N
~ i ~ ~~
~p ~~~
~ ~ ~ O
4 to ~,
~Z ~ 4~
o.oU~~
N ~~ i-
~p±-~v~
~ ~ ~ ~ >
Cn~= Ov O
•
_ ~
y c° i o~ c- c~ ~ u c
a'0~ ~ Na o. ~.c 1O~'°
E y c o ~i v aoi v a.-, a~
$c~a ~'~ ua~~ $ °iot~ S
~ ~ ~ ~
cWa o ~`v'~~~~~E'~w S,v° m~
o~ E Z'c~ gc g'~ y ~ o v n ~ , ~ ~
~ ~ Ov'-'aaNin'°~a c y~ ~~ _
O U ~ ~ ~ ~ a~a u L +L+ w ~ - l
Ji
w Z W£ ~ c o- a !~ a= V ~,p •
GZ -}' ~ ~n u c ~m N ~ y ~Tii E~g~v C.
p ~~ 4
Zo~ ~¢~ ~•~~mf ~i e (/O~¢ o ut^a rn~~"p ~L~t a ~£ N ~ ICI
Yl 61 _ C N i C y VI 3 N u '~ ~ ~ I
OZ. a ui ga. ~~ W E o+£on~ c E ~ nc6i ~, _
<W UW= w ~m 'U O i V OOC~ a~~ aeo >y E'!~ ~ o ~a~:+ • ~ i
~i-o >xu v cnir u ~ na£~ R ~'a.°!9 ~' a, n a ~ uS
°a o$
c
E`O iaL °c '° ~~~~'~i Ta "'ac v~c8i cmv~+ Ea°o ioc£cov
u~L ~~i, N~~aACi 3;'~'~aw !~, ra v°i vvi '°u mc3v ~~cav £~;~1~E
° ,nc ,.+ 14b 'O rom r' cE~i'u °JEm 'uo`u
L^n u o.o v E'~j ~ ~^ ~i € v,'O v ~~ v v o~L° °'u m`~ u~ v c °' S u v
n.v_i v a `~ 'o 'O c .~ ~o a E u c a E v ~ ~ rn c ~i ,., ~
> c n ma o a~- a v Iap- c~• o c ~>, ~ j o y£'.k
° ~ ~ ? ~ a £ ~O GyN11 ~ V +°' uO ~ ~ O ~ V ~ pv y ~ C N C ~ ~{p1 '~ C D ~ c
L rRj ti ~ Z +-' C O VI ~ a L N N u ~~~YYYI~ ~ y ; Jj v ¢ ~ ~ a N i9
~tv~o OE'D~mc n ~g'~ o oo~t~i 'Oa`~.Fm o,~,`o_o ~ '3 'aa`iE
O ~ N C ~ ~ N O ~ ~ .10 ~ ~ ~ > y ~1 Vi O Z E ~ in v N iT ~ t ~ N ~ 'in C cA i0
in '° Z ~i ~, w _ io a a ~ N 'u+ +~ ~ >• my
mx ~ W m c ~ r`' ~~m ~ ZA ~' u.o£ y y'a~ `~' ~ ~ uw d 'vi ~'°~
m n¢ `'9 > G~'~w fO ~ d+E o ~ 2'~ = N ~~£ m"Q'~ ,n y~y ~ °' r~o v m ~.`~, aEi
° ° ~ Vf ~ ~ O C i:+ i+ C 1p ~ N O 10 C "` °~ iA N E 2 VI f0 V _N _ t0
~., v m ~°~ w~.'c v m v E.C ~ Eo[a a °/_ N c o, ?.>-v:: c ~ c o
v~'Ec°/~~~;; ~~~~~~ ~`o~'°E~p1 aE m~~a~ E°vt'~ c,~mcn °J~~~tia
~pOC'~a~ >'v ~'~vi ~~ c~ ~~ Eo~!^c ~'N~~-^~ yva~o ~+~~u~~
£ . ,~ c a ~ ~ .~ ,~ E ~. c ai ~^ ,.; o v •c N °~ '_^ ~° 'tS T ._ ~ a E ~ ~ ° G ~ ~~ > 0 2 ~o
o ~~'>:~ ~ ~~ ~ u~. ~•y ~~ aci v V C ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~v'~° ~ C in ~ c~ n
m n~c °'~a'• ¢rnc Q,E ~'~~ ° ~ ~ c Zvi' vc O $~v
~o~~-c~E~ W°c}; ~i~-E.~v, ~' ~mc~o .C'~'i~.°.~ ~aEi~£c ~~im m£
<v~v°vua~~Sn -~iEd~aTiE Ec>•~~~u v ~a~~~q ~o>~2q5~ ~+aEa> ~->°E3Ea°~
tO7H¢AV~ivo VUOUE`uv°i v`~E~i$Ev ~~~ ~uTh~' t~~.O~ ~a~tv O~u~c°~m~
m
O
A
D
O
I
z
m
N
/O
0
m
< < t < < < < ~
0 0~ a o c S v c a m
aao Q~$~ ~ ~~ o ~
mmQg_morno ~~° ° ° °,c„p
3 bi ~ d ~y n_ ?rnpTma Imo
a > >.~. ~ ~3mn~'~
pD~~Q~ O~~~R~o
g~vo A c N~~`g~ Z
~ C ~
i101i ~ o ~~ 3 ' m
d 7 O ~
i (~ ~ C rr °
~p O _ 1'f
O n
A n ~ Q u
~ ~ 0 3 D °
a a a c
~ d v~ vii
~ ~
v ~
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • N
O O
(1~~(1~l'1 r()('1V1C1~ ~ ~T ~Z2m~ vUfvpT
ciOao~,°.~,~os44~. .07o mom .~c~~n
~ °J~K333v 3
vro-ooa_d~3~v~v~+nimroro~C m'~N~r3o ~c~.w
w c v f x a 3 ~ T~ oC-i-i c y D 2 ovi Q y~ =~ _~ 0 9
~ ~
z ro ~ sp B <_ o'~ *w ~a > >
c a vN a 3~~ O D~• ~ ro
a ~ of ° ro
(0 N T ~ ~ Z U1 ~
~ ¢p ~ ~ 41
d ~ N
3 n
a
~o
^ ^ '~
'--
^ ~ m
~ ~ !:
~ 3
i,. ~ ^ r
.. ~ ~ ^
,~
n
^ • i
~
~
~
w
3
^
i ~
n
~ ~ ~ ~ ~r z
C'1 w D G7 0+ rfl d D
j a naO°' B~ m n°a c ~Cf~ ~ y Z~
In ~ ry ~ ~ N ~p ~ O • • Q • • • ~ A • • • • • • • • • ,~., • • • ~ m
n~ ~_ D rp o~ m (/~ D f~ ~ y ~D" ~ ~ N C
~~ si O 'nn Oi rD ~ ~~ A~ ? ~ rn ~O O Cr p 7. D'~?N Vf Ta1~3A ~ S~c n d ~~ NT
~~a a D~~~~4 ~ oo. ~ °~ a'< ~3° ~m ~,Smo~~ &o,~N~ n33 v
~ ~ ? s ~N ^, ~ ~ ~3 ~~ o ~ ^ nfD ~ TA ° a ~ °-'•~i yma r^ i~O ern A~.rn m
~,~ n~ w'~ ~ ~ -gym m ~ 3r• > j n,n°<° $~~ rn
3~0 - - a3 ~,~ ,~ o3r o~ °~°; '°„Z„ v ono oo,~~~ Rr -+
^a ....~: .-9 ~ `"°~D' ate a ~fD ~n 1D=m ~Z ~' `°.~D au3,~3R o~'c~ <
tn' .; # •.r w.-ww, ~vp ~ ~~j' d S rno 7 N v' ~ N ~ ~ D ~ bi ~ n ~ ~~
.f e.... tiw 'F-,. ~. , ~ ~ j 3 D O a ~ o o' n ~ v (~ .D-+ ~ 7 n~ v~ ~1 -'y1
Sig 7 ?. ro
a ~ .~ ~ ....~ f ~.~ o D 'O '~ r<o °1 R ~ c ~ n c ~' ~ o ~ m
~ x i . , ~ ~ i4. y ". 4 j .0, t0 ~ 61 ~ (D rn N
O +dr ~ ~ s .a ...~f /I ~ ~ ~•. ~O .e R Q ~ ~ n OD. ~ `G
~ •. C ~ Ma M• ~ fD ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ Z
U,
~~I
i ~~
~~
~-
~ ~~
~N~~~
~~
~~~~~
~ g~ ~
W
~~g~
t y
Z
0~~~~~
~ ~~~ ~~
~~o~~~
_~~
a ~
~~
c
~~~~
~ ~~
R~11~
~r
4~
~~
_.. __ __.-. N~ry~InOrN~..
~w~a~
rr~~r sqn~~~ ~a.~w~
4M ~~
II
U
---1
i o Ill ~ ,,
,w~
0
0
^ ~~~
_~~~.:
.~
~'
,~
•
-a
:;
.~,..~.~,,,..M....a...
......, a....., .., ~ ~..
. ~.
1' '~i
/I~~er W W r~~ h~~M1~ IOC
~,;
,~.,
~+r1
9
9
Q ~ ~ 'i~
00~~
ao~
• ~ O ~i
~~ I~~~
~~a~
~:~~Y
' ~..-
^~;S
~~ ~ ~
~~ ~
~ «~.
~~~ ~
® goo
l',
Ise' ~~
3 R rj
. , . ~~
ff~ >s
1~:~
L ~
~'
ry~
.°~
~~~~~
~~~ ~ ~~
~ _~-~~~~ ~ ~ ~9~q~
S ~ ;~N'~$g z~
R 3~ ~~~g~
/ ;~~~
~~R~ ~ ~~
3~$ _ ~c;
a g~ _~
~~"a ~u~~
~ ~ ~
.. ~;
oa
~~,~ ~
i
/i -
.v
p f ~,
/~ _~ z$
~~~ ~ ~~ a
~„a~ ~~ ~~ ~P~~~~~E<g~a~
~ ` ~ok ~o~ o
~~ ~~o
a
E--'
z
w
^~^
1~
^W^
Fri
LL
(~
W
[~
L~L
C~
U
r~
~~
r^
0
~~
0
w
~~
~~
N
a
3
~'.
1'
":~ (~
`.
n~
~,
m3
VJ ~ngVY
J¢O:~~J:L
Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~
__,
J / -~
l ~ ~
Y I '~ t - -
v Y
moo
~~<
~=Z
J
~ 2 W
G 1-~ J
° r
~ W 6
Y ~/1
W
Y~~
CyLi~
L ~ W
W~~
~y0
? 3 y~
C y T
~ <
~ m ~
_y0
r °r~ N
C
~C" m W
Z<_
C
sLL0y
t7h-
~~i
f
~~~
..
.~l l Y
C$az
,f a
`~«i:
~~ ~ ~
~Z~J~
:O n:,a
i
W
F
s
W~
O 2
J t
i f J
r f f
G C~'
a~~
`~r
G F
o~
~o
(J
m
h
•
~ _
• ~ ~ 00 .5 '4 ,~i E L
Q p ~ ~ ~ _ T, ~ u x
W CVO ~ ~th,',~yy>~rs
Q W • ~~ G 61 Y t
a __.-~ ~-
N U .ri a ~ ~ ~ r~'~ c
iL ~• bra V ~ C$ ~ ~~
f •g
~ N .
~a~ ~~~
' ~ u ~'
O _~
W/ ~ v ' O ~Vy3I ~ .,,.
V ~ ~3 ~~~~r~sc~ - N ~ 3 `
cn ~ E.~ ~;
.~~ tE Y
~ . _ .~ ~ .~
Z ~N ~ ~' ~y ~$Y~3 ~
W t =_
St ~"
(n ~i n .n m re ~ H U ~ ~ w ~ c=. 51 cn
~~
2 „
0
V W z ~
W 0 M A
Q ~ ~ $~
Z=tv~
oN~~
f~=~~
~z
u
Zug ~
~~o °
J M
c~
Q ~ T.
z=~~
~, o
c~
,~
•
~~
~ ~
E ~
[~
~~
P219
' ' ~~~~ -S
~-- - .
_ ,
T }~3 E C I T Y O F
~._ v J' )~.xh. ~~
RANCIIO CUCAMONCA
Staff Report
DATE: March 19, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTEES TO THE LIBRARY
FOUNDATION BOARD
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-
committee's recommendation to appoint Tina Gilfry and Chris White and to re-
appoint Bruce Bowne to the Library Foundation Board.
BACKGROUND
The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation currently has three vacancies on
the Library Foundation Board.
The Library Sub-Committee, at their meeting of March 3, 2008, considered the
applications of potential appointees and received Library Staff's recommendation to
reappoint current Library Foundation Member Bruce Bowne.
After discussion, the Library Sub-committee is recommending appointment of new
members Tina Gilfry and Chris White and reappointment of Bruce Bowne.
Res ectfully submitted,
6~
Deborah Kaye Clar
Library Director