The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008/04/02 - Agenda PacketI~ ~\ ,, . . 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15` and 3rd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. APRIL 2, 2008 MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. L. Dennis Michael Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Debra J. Adams, CMC ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. `~ INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC CU~ ONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the Cit)rs website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us ® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, Please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA I CR~orr°cn APRIL 2, 2008 A. :3O P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM 1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGpENDA 2 RANCHO APRIL, 2, 2OOH CUCAMONGA G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April as "Child Abuse Prevention Month." 2. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing April 13 - 19, 2008 as National Library Week, and introduction of Library staff. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this orie hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY CCOUNCIL AGpENDA 3 RANCHO APRIL Z, ZOO8 CUCAMONGA J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to comments made by the general public. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: February 21, 2008 (special joint mtg. w/CVWD) (Spagnolo absent) March 5, 2008 (special mtg re Healthy Cities) March 5, 2008 (regular meeting) March 19, 2008 (regular meeting) ~ 2. Approval of Check Register dated March 12 through March 25, 2008, for the total amount of $260,212.46. 3. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract 2 in the amount of $1,562,626, including one bid alternate, plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $156,262 to the apparent lowest responsive bidder, Gamut Construction of Montclair, California, (RA 08-005), for the Archibald Library Remodel Project, to be funded by an appropriation from Fund 640 Fund Balance to Acct. No. 2640801-5602. L. CONSENT CALENDAR- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. 4. Approval of Minutes: February 21, 2008 (special joint mtg. w/CVWD) (Spagnolo absent) March 5, 2008 (special mtg re Healthy Cities) March 5, 2008 (regular meeting) March 19, 2008 (regular meeting) 5. Approval of Check Register dated March 12 through March 25, 2008, for the total amount of $ $70,163.10. 6. Approval to adopt a boundary map showing Parcel Number 0201-043-54 (Peter & Heather 6 Thuresson), 10059 Snowdrop Rd., to be annexed into CFD 88-1. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGpENDA 4 CU~ ONGA APRIL 2, ZOO8 RESOLUTION NO. FD OS-011 $ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-2) SHOWING PROPERTY _ TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 7. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 9 88-OS-2 (APN: 0201-043-54, Peter & Heather Thuresson), into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, specifying facilities and services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the annexation and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-012 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-2) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 8. Approval of an Agreement (CO FD OS-004) between representatives of the Rancho 16-1 Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Local 2274, Fire Support Services Association, and Fire Management Employee Group, fixing the employer's contribution under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act, and a revised CaIPERS Resolution stating the same. RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-013 16-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. 9. Approval of Minutes: February 21, 2008 (special joint mtg. w/CVWD) (Spagnolo absent) March 5, 2008 (special mtg re Healthy Cities) March 5, 2008 (regular meeting) March 19, 2008 (regular meeting) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL~fAGpENDA 5 RANCHO APRIL 2, ZOOS C.UCAMONGA 10. Approval of Check Register dated March 12 through March 23, 2008, and payroll ending 17 March 25, 2008 for the total amount of $3,640,610.21. 11. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of 50 Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4~" Street to Arrow Route and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 2500' west of Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue, to be funded from Transportation funds, Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1076124-0, Prop 42 funds, Acct. No. 1190303-5650/1076190-0 and Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-565011372176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 08-070 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO ARROW ROUTE AND ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 2500' WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 12. Approval of the Project Development Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho 57 Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino (CO 08-032) for the construction of Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4~" Street to Arrow Route. 13. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting (CO 08-033), 59 not to exceed $185,830, for the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or Environmental Impact Report (DRC2008-00263) for the Biane Business Park Project, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be funded from the developer deposit through Account No. 10013145303. 14. Approval of an appropriation of $200,000 to Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1398124-0 for utility 116 undergrounding fees for the landscape improvement project on the MWD Parkway at the southeast corner of Bluegrass Avenue and Wilson Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Fund balance. 15. Approval of a request from Run for the Wall for a Waiver of Fees and Charges for local 118 events associated with the run. 16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract 120 in the amount of $516,998.48 to the apparent low bidder, Diversified Landscape Management, Inc. (CO 08-034) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $51,699.85, for the Highland Avenue and Fairmont Way Street Improvements from San Benito to Kenyon Way and Highland Landscape north of Highland from San Benito to Fairmont Way, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. No. 112403-5650/1514124- 0 and Capital Reserve Funds, Acct. No. 1025001-5650/1514025-0. 17. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 08-035) located 126 at 6767 Amethyst Avenue, APN No. 020211111, submitted by John A. Hafner. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 Cu~ oNCn APRIL 2, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. 08-071 127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN A. HAFNER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO .SIGN THE SAME 129 18. Approval to accept the bids received, and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $88,982.50 to the apparent low bidder, Lifestyle Landscapes, Inc. (CO 08- 036), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,898.25 for the Banyan Community Trail from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Acct. No. 1 1 1 031 6-56 5011 61 31 1 0-0. 136 19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2003-01085, located on the south side of 7'" Street at the cul-de-sac terminus east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Scheu Management Corporation. 139 RESOLUTION NO. OS-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-01085 140 20. Approval of reductions in improvement security for Rancho Etiwanda Estates infrastructure (Tentative Tract Maps 16226 and 16227 and LMD Landscaping for Tracts 16226 & 16227), located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by JTY Investment, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 08-073 ~ 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REDUCTIONS IN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES (TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 16226 AND 16227) RESOLUTION NO. 08-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REDUCTION IN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES (LMD LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 16226 AND 16227) 146 21. Approval to release the Maintenance cash deposit for DRC2005-00715, located on Arrow 147 Route, Jersey Boulevard and Boston Place, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga II, LLC. 22. Approval to accept Improvements, retain $2,760.00 of the Faithful Performance cash deposit 149 in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 17938, located on the east side of Pittsburgh Avenue at 5th Street, submitted by Rock- - Pitt, LLC. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGpENDA ~ RANCHO APRIL, 2, ZOO8 CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO 08-075 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 17938 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING FO A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 23 Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a 153 Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16926, located on the northwest corner of 4`" Street and Buffalo Avenue, submitted by DEB Construction RESOLUTION NO OS-076 155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16926 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24 Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16542, located at 6717 East 156 Avenue, north of Victoria Street, submitted by J T Storm Development No 2, LLC 25 Approval to accept the Haven Avenue and 19`" Street Parkway Improvement Protect, 158 Contract No 07-078 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the Acting City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $611,147 17 RESOLUTION NO 08-077 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE AND 19T" STREET PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO 07-078, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting regwrements. 1 INTRODUCTION AND DEMONSTRATION OF NEW LIBRARY WEB PAGE (power point presentation) O. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the Crty Council for discussion 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Counalmember.) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGpENDA 8 RANCHO APRIL 2, 2OOH CUCAMONGA 2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) 3. UPDATE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE 162 P. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Q. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 27, 2008, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 21, 2008 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT MEETING WITH THE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (CVWD) A. CALL TO ORDER A special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire Protection District and Cucamonga Valley Water District.(CVWD) was held on Thursday, February 21, 2008, at Central Park - Etiwanda Hall, located at 11200 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/President/Chairman Donald J. Kurth, M.D. called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Boardmembers/Agencymembers: Rex Gutierrez (arrived at 4:36 p.m.), Diane Williams (arrived at 4:33 p.m.), Mayor Pro TemNice President/Vice Chairman L. Dennis Michael; and Mayor/President/Chairman Donald J. Kurth. Present were CVWD Directors: Floyd E. Clark, Ronald Sakala, Kathy Tiegs, Vice President Randall Reed, and President James V. Curatalo, Jr. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; James Troyer, Planning Director; Corky Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director; Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Dave Blevins, Public Works Superintendent; Jeff Barnes, Parks Maintenance Superintendent; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk/Assistant Secretary/Secretary. Absent was Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember: Sam Spagnolo •___.. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 61. John Lyons mentioned the water level of many of the recreational lakes being very low. He encouraged everyone to work together to solve this problem. C: ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS. PRESENTATION ON LANDSCAPE ALLIANCE Mayor Pro TemNice PresidenWice Chairman Michael stated he and Director Tiegs are on the Inland Empire Landscape Alliance (IELA). He asked Wyatt Toxel with the IELA to comment on the Alliance. Mr. Toxel briefly spoke about the IELA and introduced Brad Buller who was hired by the Inland Empire Utility Agency (IEUA). Mr. Buller commented about new legislation that water agencies will need to comply with by the end of March. He felt it was important for everyone to work together. Special City Council/Fire Board/Redevelopment Agency/Cucamonga Valley Water District Meeting February 21, 2008 Page 2 Mayor Pro Tem/Vice PresidenUVice Chairman Michael felt it was very important for everyone to work with the Alliance to come up with an Ordinance that could be followed. Item C3 was discussed at this time. The minutes will remain in agenda order. 2. UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF RECYCLED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM A power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, was given by Martin E. Zvirbulis, Deputy General Manager. ACTION: Report received and filed. 3. UPDATE ON REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES AND DEMANDS A power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, was given by Robert A. DeLoach, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer. ACTION : Report received and filed. ...... A DINNER BREAK WAS TAKEN AT 5:55 P.M. THE MEETING WAS CALLED BACK TO ORDER AT 6:40 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. ...... 4. UPDATE ON CENTRAL PARK DEVELOPMENT A staff report was presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, explaining the design of the park and all it has to offer. ACTION: Report received and filed. 5. UPDATE ON JOINT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development, stated one of the joint efforts would be Central Park and the reclamation and recycling facilities. He stated they want concurrence to proceed with these efforts. Robert DeLoach, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer, stated that CVWD does want to work with the City to provide services to the community. President Curatalo felt the City and CVWD have worked well in the past and should continue working togetter as a partnership. He felt there should be policies set that compliment everyone in the partnership. He hoped everyone would agree to work together and suggested staff have a workshop to discuss ideas where they can partner. He felt it would be good for City Manager Jack Lam and General Manager/Chief Executive Officer Robert DeLoach to move forward with partnership ideas. Mayor/PresidenUChairman Kurth stated he agreed with this. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams wondered why there hasn't been more discussed about Tapia Park and the work being done by the City and CVWD for this. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice President/Vice Chairman Michael stated he agreed with the partnership idea. He felt it was a good idea for the staff from both agencies to get together and discuss ideas. Special City Council/Fire Board/Redevelopment Agency/Cucamonga Valley Water District Meeting February 21, 2008 Page 3 Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Gutierrez asked why there are still so many septic systems in the City. President Curatalo stated they would like to convert everything to sewer. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Gutierrez stated he would be interested in the cost to do this. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice President/Vice Chairman Michael stated it needs the community to come together and say they want to do this. Robert DeLoach, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer, stated it doesn't cost as much when there is a large group in a neighborhood hooking up. Boardmember Tiegs stated she looks forward to working with the City and the CVWD Board. ACTION: Report received and filed. 6. UPDATE ON RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROCESS A power point presentation was given by Corky Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, and Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Mayor/PresidenUChairman Kurth stated there is always a price to pay to do this, but we have to find a way to do this for our residents and businesses. He said we need everyone's input as to how green and how healthy we want to be. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice PresidenUVice Chairman Michael suggested some of CVWD's meetings be taped and the City show them on Channel 3 as an educational tool. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams asked if CVWD has ever thought about televising their meetings. President Curatalo stated it is definitely something they could revisit. JoLynne Perera, CVWD Staff, stated they are taping some educational segments and that they air on public television. Boardmember Clark felt the community is getting the word about water conversation. Boardmember Reed thanked the City for hosting this meeting and liked the idea of partnerships. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, stated staff would be contacting CVWD and the IEUA to participate in the stakeholder's meeting for the General Plan Update. Boardmember Sakala felt everyone should meet more frequently. ACTION: Report received and filed. Special City Council/Fire Board/Redevelopment Agency/Cucamonga Valley Water District Meeting February 21, 2008 Page 4 D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk/Secretary/Assistant Secretary Approved: ' March 5, 2008 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council/Fire Protection District/Redevelopment Agency was held on Wednesday, March 5, 2008, in the Tri Communities Room at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/President/Chairman Donald J. Kurth, M.D. called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Boardmembers/Agencymembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams (arrived at 3:06 p.m.), Mayor Pro TemNice PresidenUVice Chairman L. Dennis Michael; and Mayor/PresidenUChairman Donald J. Kurth, M.D.. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst; Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; James Troyer, Planning Director; Corky Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director; Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Barbara Tuncay, Assistant Planner; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Dave Blevins, Public Works Superintendent; Karen McGuire-Emery, Sr. Park Planner; Mike TenEyck, Utility Operation Manager; Linda Ceballos, Environmental Program Manager; Robert Lemon, Management Analyst III; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director; Michelle Perera, Library Services Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk/Assistant Secretary/Secretary. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF HEALTHY CITIES PROGRAM IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA The item was introduced by Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director, outlining what would be included in the staff presentation. Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager, began the presentation of the staff report. She then introduced Evelyn Trevino, County of San Bernardino. Ms. Trevino, County of San Bernardino, presented information about the background of "healthy cities" stating it came about because of the obesity epidemic, which can also lead to diabetes. She continued talking about obesity and the increase of this every year. She added the "healthy cities" program is intended to promote a healthy community county-wide through nutritious food and exercise. She talked about the County staff that head up this program and the services their program offers. She felt Rancho Cucamonga has a big head start at being a "healthy city." She felt staff was enthusiastic and motivated Special City Council/Fire Board/Redevelopment Agency Meeting March 5, 2008 Page 2 Mayor Pro Tem/Vice President/Vice Chairman Michael asked if the Chamber can also get involved with this. Ms. Trevino, County of San Bernardino, stated yes and that other cities have also included their Chambers of Commerce in their programs. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Spagnolo asked how the schools can get involved. Ms. Trevino, County of San Bernardino, stated children are crucial in this program and felt we should get the school districts involved. She stated they are working with the school districts and so have other cities. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams asked if there is anything on a state level that requires more activity for the students. Ms. Trevino stated they are working for more children's wellness programs. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Gutierrez felt it was important for people that are overweight to lose the weight. He felt by people donating $1.00 for every pound they lose to help this program would be a good idea. He felt signal synchronization would help to promote a healthy community because there would be less air pollution. He felt festivals with activities would provide exercise for the community. He liked the idea of Bicycle Day and Cucamonga Beach. He felt kids walking to school would also provide for more exercise for the kids. He stated hiking would promote healthy cities. He felt by expanding the dog park not only would exercise the pets, but also their owners. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams stated some of the Rancho Cucamonga High School students are utilizing the trails to get to and from school and felt it was a good place to start. Sam Gennawey, Hogle Ireland, who is the General Plan Update Consultant, talked about incorporating healthy cities into the General Plan, and stated that both of these efforts are in alignment with each other. He felt Rancho Cucamonga would be at the forefront of a healthy community by incorporating these efforts with the work being done on the General Plan. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams hoped we can also get the Planning Commission's buy-in with this program. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, continued with the staff report. He also referred to the gold and blue handouts that were distributed, which are on file in the City Clerk's office. Norm McKenzie, Chamber of Commerce President and CEO, stated they have already started a healthy cities program for the business community. Melissa Mata, Fitness Expert with Perfection Fitness, stated they are also doing a motivational program relating to healthy cities and distributed flyers, with a copy on file in the City Clerk's office. Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager, continued with the staff presentation. Jack Lam, City Manager, felt it was important to incorporate this effort along with the General Plan Update. Councilmember/Boardmember/Agencymember Williams felt staff needs to be utilizing the trails and also promoting them. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice PresidenWice Chairman Michael felt it was good to have exercise facilities/equipment available at the parks for people to utilize. Mayor/President/Chairman Kurth felt the Council was on board with the healthy cities efforts. He was glad to see the Chamber wanting to be involved also. Special City Council/Fire Board/Redevelopment Agency Meeting March 5, 2008 Page 3 Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director, stated staff can come back at a Council meeting to adopt a Resolution branding a healthy cities program for Rancho Cucamonga. James Troyer, Planning Director, stated on March 12'" there will be a staff workshop on healthy cities and sustainability of green programs and that this will come to the Council at a workshop on April 2nd D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned 4:23 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk/Secretary/Assistant Secretary Approved: ' March 5, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 5, 2008, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Present were Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem, L. Dennis Michael, and President/Mayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; and Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) PresidenUMayor Kurth announced the closed session items: B1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire B2. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -Fire C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No one was present to comment on the closed session items. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 2 F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:53 p.m. with no action taken. G. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council was held on Wednesday, March 5, 2008, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael, and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, Executive Director/City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel/City Attorney; Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst; Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs Manager; Flavio Nunez, RDA Analyst II; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manager; Sid Siphomsay, Information Services Analyst I; Shelly Munson, Information Services Specialist II; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community DevelopmenUlnterim City Engineer; Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer; James Troyer, Planning Director; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Kurt Keating, Code Enforcement Supervisor and the rest of the Code Enforcement staff; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Assistant Library Director; Michelle Perera, Library Services Manager; Renee Tobin, Principal Librarian; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director; Captain Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Fire Marshall Rob Ball, Fire Inspector Tim Fejeran, Captain Cheryl Roberts, Fire Prevention Specialist II Michelle Seckler, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of a check for $43,000 from the Friends of the Library by the President of the Friends of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Members of the Friends of the Library presented a $43,000 check to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. H2. Recognition of Community and City Participants in the 2007 Spark of Love Toy Program. Fire Chief Peter Bryan and Captain Cheryl Roberts recognized those that participated in the Spark of Love Toy Program and presented them with certificates. H3. Announcement regarding "Healthy Hounds and Humans," in partnership with 24-Hour Fitness, promoting the health benefits of pet ownership. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 3 Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director, introduced "Wiggles" who is available to be adopted. He commented on the benefits of owning a pet. He commented on the adoption program they have with 24- Hour Fitness and the benefits you would have by adopting a pet. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Tom Thomas, Nick Victorio and Allan Portacorero, Creative Outdoor Advertising, stated they want to work with the City to try to keep the animated sign people employed. He felt they should be allowed to use the animated signs. He asked what they can do to keep their employees working. Nick Victoria stated they are monitoring their animated sign people and making sure they are not leaving a mess at the location they are working at. He stated Hemet has a permit process for these types of sign activities. 12. Shyra Harris and Beth Levy wanted to talk to the Council about juvenile delinquency and youth programming and distributed material which is on file in the City Clerk's office. She stated they are asking that Rancho Cucamonga get involved in their programs that they. support. 13. Jim Moffatt talked about the USO and stated they will be at Red Hill Coffee Shop this Friday collecting donations. He told people to stop by and support the USO. 14. Frank Atry stated he could not get a return phone call from the Mayor or City Manager, and couldn't understand why. He stated he is going to pursue his concerns with the police department and the staff at City Hall. He hoped they will establish dialogue with him. He stated he would be introducing a petition and hoped to get assistance getting it off the ground. 15. John Lyons defended the Sheriff's Department and stated the only people that have problems with them are the criminals. He mentioned the recent heavy winds we had over the weekend. He stated at the southeast corner of Foothill and Rochester the dust was really bad and felt we need to do something to help eliminate the blowing dust. He wished that information could be presented at a meeting to explain about the Fire Explorer program. He commented on how much he likes the new trail and how he rides his bike on it. He stated he likes Rancho Cucamonga's trail better than Upland's. He stated where the trail meets at Archibald he would like to see a place where people can stop to eat and park their bike or horse. 16. Debbie Lei and Christina, Los Osos High School and representing Lower Case People, updated the Council about their program and asked them for their support. She stated they will be having an event on March 14 at the corner of Day Creek and Highland to raise awareness of the conditions of other countries. She stated on April 11 they are asking other high schools to participate and join in another event they will be having. She stated people can contact their organization at osos.lowercasepeople. com. 17. Jim Frost talked about the Run for the Wall event to start on May 14 that will be leaving our City and heading for Washington, D.C. He showed a photo of the helicopters that will be flying with the motorcycles to Washington, D.C. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 4 J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Councilmember Spagnolo referred to the man that spoke about the sign ordinance and stated it is currently still being reviewed by the subcommittee. He stated it is not a done deal at this time. He stated he was perplexed about the man that made a lot of innuendos with no facts to support them. He suggested the girls that spoke about the juvenile delinquency youth programming contact the Police Department regarding the problems going on in the schools. Councilmember Gutierrez stated the human directional signs have always been illegal in the City, but that we really haven't enforced it unless there was a complaint. He stated he and Councilmember Spagnolo will be meeting about the sign issue very soon. He stated he is also concerned about the man that made the negative comments. He stated he appreciated the efforts of the Lower Case People. He said the Council does try to address everyone's concerns. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated he felt every elected official does take this job seriously and that customer service is very important to them. He also referred the ladies that talked about the juvenile delinquency youth programming information to talk to the Police Department. He mentioned the animated sign speakers and stated the subcommittee will be looking at this and taking more time to come up with a solution. He stated it is great to see the high school students address the Council. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed with the confusion about the police matter. She stated the social works students should get with some of the workforce housing unit people. She felt there were a lot of teenagers that are doing good things that people just don't hear about. Mayor Kurth stated juvenile delinquency is a terrible problem. He encouraged them to get in touch with the restorative justice program. He stated he always tries to return all of his phone calls. He stated he appreciated hearing from the Lower Case People. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he is not familiar with the man that said he and the Mayor are not returning phone calls. He stated if the man has a police matter they should contact Chief Cusimano. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Kt. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $863,748.05. K2. Approval of a contract with G/M Business Interiors and various other contracts to provide and install systems and freestanding furniture, carpeting and related items for various departments throughout City Hall, utilizing a County of San Bernardino contract, to be funded as per the 2007/2008 approved budget for Redevelopment Agency Acct. Nos. 2650801-5602 and 2650801-5207 (Public Improvements 2001 TAB), and authorize staff to transfer funds associated with the project to the appropriate accounts. K3. Approval to accept bids received and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $75,000.00 to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., (RA 08-006 / CO 08-013) of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffiti Abatement Services, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and Acct No. 2620801- 5300 ($26,250), as approved in the FY 2007-08 Budget with an option to renew for additional one-year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 5 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT L4. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $64,228.63. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams to approve item L4 contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL M5. Approval of Check Register dated February 13 through February 26, 2008, and payroll ending February 26, 2008, for the total amount of $5,451,174.31. M6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Banvan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Bervl Street, to be funded from Measure "I" funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1627176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 08-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M7. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $12,739.00 awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2007), administered by the State of California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Acct. No. 1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $4,869.00 into Acct. No. 1380501-5207 (O&M/Capital Supplies) and $7,870.00 into Acct. No. 1380501-5603 (Capital Outlay-Equipment). M8. Approval to declare surplus City-owned miscellaneous equipment and vehicles. M9. Approval to award a contract to C.S. Legacy Construction, Inc. (CO 08-016), in the amount of $1,831,717.25 (plus a 10% contingency) from Park Development Account No. 1120305-5650/1313120-0 for the construction of the South Etiwanda Park aka Garcia Park Improvement Project. M10. Approval to accept bids received and .authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $75,000.00 to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., (CO 08-013 / RA 08-006), of Azusa, California, for Citywide Graffiti Abatement Services, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and Acct No. 2620801- 5300 ($26,250), as approved in the FY 2007-08 Budget with an option to renew for additional one-year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of four years beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 6 M11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14759 (Traffic Signals), located at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and the other at Banyan Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Pulte Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 08-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14759 (TRAFFIC SIGNALS) M12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6`" Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken. M13. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00097 located at 12645 6`h Street, submitted by Inland Empire Utilities Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 08-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00097 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M14. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16089, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by David F. Dowding & Judy Dowding, husband and wife, Daniel Valdivia & Karla Valdivia, husband and wife, and Fabricio Badiola, a married man. RESOLUTION NO. 08-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16089 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M15. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759 (street improvements), located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. OS-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759 (STREET IMPROVEMENTS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-1, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 7 M17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Pertormance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-2, located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M18. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14759-2 (Rancho Summit Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. M19. Approval to release the Faithful Pertormance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14759-3 (Olive Grove Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. M20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14759-3, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 08-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14759-3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M21. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan to Wilson project, Contract No. 07-218 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and authorize the Acting City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $112,944.00. RESOLUTION NO. 08-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN TO WILSON PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-218, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Moticn carried unanimously 5-0. N. JOINT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL ITEMS N1, N2, N3 AND 01 WERE CONSIDERED AT ONE TIME. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 8 N1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00835 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub area 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006- 00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the City Council for final action. RESOLUTION NO. 08-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006- 00635, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14. ORDINANCE NO. 790 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, O5, 06, 11, 13, AND 14 A power point, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, for item N1 was presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. A recess was taken at 8:37 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:45 p.m. with all members present. A staff report on items N2, N3 and 01 was presented by Flavio Nunez, RDA Analyst II. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 9 A power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, was given by Tony Mize, the applicant for the project. Agencymember/Councilmember Michael asked about the waiting list of people for this type of housing. He stated there are also other requirements to be met as well. Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director, stated it is approximately two years. Agencymember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the background check process to get into this type of unit. Tony Mize explained this. He asked that the project be approved. Chairman/Mayor Kurth asked City Attorney Markman to explain the legal requirements that both the City and Agency need to address in terms of affordable housing. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is within the Redevelopment Project Area, 20% of the available tax increment is required by law to be used to generate or sustain low to moderate income housing. He stated if you don't fulfill this obligation, the City's economic development program could be shut down. He stated this is an overriding requirement of Redevelopment law for the City Redevelopment Agency. Chairman/Mayor Kurth opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Agency/City Council were John Lyons stated he would like to see the existing residents get a 6' wall. He felt Center and Church was a lousy intersection. He felt this needed to be fixed. He stated he did support the project. Dan Aylworth, Inland Valley Education Center, stated he does support the project. He stated he is here on behalf of Sharon Arpella. He didn't feel this project should be three story because the neighboring homes are single story homes. He stated he realizes we need workforce housing, but felt it should be scaled down to go with existing housing. Norm McKenzie, President and CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, stated they support this project. He felt it was important to approve this project before the state forces the City to do it. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Agencymember/Councilmember Spagnolo stated the City offers its services to help a community improve itself. He felt there were some two story homes near the area of this proposed project. He stated he supports this project and National Community Renaissance. He felt they do a very nice project. Agencymember/Councilmember Gutierrez stated he concurred with what Agencymember/Councilmember Spagnolo stated and felt we do need some work done in this area. He felt this project will improve the quality of life for people that live in the area of the proposed project. He felt the product this company puts out is very good. Vice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated there are a lot of people that work in the City that can't afford some of the homes here, and added this type of housing gives the opportunity for some of our workforce to be able to own a home. He felt the location of this project will allow these people to use our mass transit system for their convenience. He applauded the staff and National Core for the quality of this project. He stated he supports the project as presented. Agencymember/Councilmember Williams asked if the entire project would be surrounded by a block wall. James Troyer, Planning Director, stated yes Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 10 Tony Mize stated they will remove any of the neighbors walls that are a hodge podge and put up block walls. Agencymember/Councilmember Williams felt this was great that some of these people can freshen up their existing properties. She felt this project would be a great addition to this area. She liked the amenities it has to offer. She stated she was in support of the project which would enhance the area and also Foothill. She also liked the programs the management has to offer. Chairman/Mayor Kurth apologized to the man that didn't get to finish his presentation earlier in the meeting due to our public comment time limitation. He stated it has been his goal as Mayor to have an orderly meeting and that everyone has five minutes. He felt everyone deserved a decent place to live. He felt we do need workforce housing in our City. He felt we have an obligation as a City to have this type of housing here. He stated he is supportive of this project and felt it will benefit our City and fulfills a humanitarian commitment to find housing for all types of people. Vice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated with regards to the comment made by the gentlemen that left that the reason the developer got more than five minutes is because he is part of the presentation for the project. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 790. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve Resolution Nos. 08-055, 08-056, 08- 057 and waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 790 for the March 19, 2008 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve RDA Resolution No. 08-003 and the agreements in item 01. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"), IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO RESOLUTION NO. RA 08-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ("PROPERTY"), IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO SEE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER ITEM N1. RESOLUTION NO. 08-056 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY SEE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER ITEM N1. ~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS SEE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER ITEM N1. 02. PRESENTATION REGARDING ON-LINE PAYMENT AND PROCESSING OF PERMIT FEES (oral/PowerPoint presentation) A item was introduced by Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official. A power point presentation was given by Manuel Pilonietta, Information Services Manager, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. ACTION: Report received and filed. ITEMS 03 AND 04 WERE CONSIDERED AT THIS TIME. 03. PRESENTATION OF THE RECENT NEIGHBORHOOD CLEAN-UP EVENT (oral/Power-Point presentation) A power point presentation was given by Kurt Keating, Code Enforcement Supervisor, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. The staff from Code Enforcement were introduced at this time. ACTION: Report received and filed. 04. INTRODUCTION OF CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF AND AN OVERVIEW OF CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES (oral/PowerPoint presentation) SEE DISCUSSION UNDER ITEM 03 RESOLUTION NO. 08-057 AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE. AND AUTHORIZATION OF AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $18.5 MILLION FROM ACCT. NO. 2622801-5620. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 5, 2008 Page 12 P. COUNCIL BUSINESS P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo mentioned Tree City USA award has again been given to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He stated five trees will be presented at the Ralph M. Lewis Park with the assistance of Coyote Canyon School to occur at 9:30 a.m. on March 12th. He pointed out that effective this Friday all City facilities would be smoke free. Mayor Pro Tem Michael commented on the Council workshop held earlier in the day regarding healthy cities. Councilmember Williams commented on the legislative report (item P2) and stated the City is monitoring what the state is doing with their budget. She stated all cities and counties are going to get hit hard by the State. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated today was an Omnitrans meeting and that it was reported most of the riders are satisfied with the service. He encouraged the community to get on one of the buses when headed to work to see how effective it might be and to eliminate so many cars on the road. Mayor Kurth stated during the recess he called the man who said his phone calls weren't being returned, and that the man refused to talk to him. He commented on the number of deaths due to smoking. He stated today Congress approved legislation pertaining to treatment for alcohol and drug addiction and that it would require insurance companies to cover this type of treatment. P2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (oral report) See Councilmember Williams' comments in Item P1. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. R. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC ` Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk Approved: March 19, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Present were Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnold, Diane Williams, Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael, and PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; and Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) PresidenUMayor Kurth announced the closed session item: B1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire ...,.. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS No one was present to comment on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:35 p.m. ...,., E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 2 ' G. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council was held on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael, and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, Legal Ccunsel/City Attorney; Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst; Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Lorraine Phong, Sr. Information Services Analyst; Mike Toy, Information Services Specialist I; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community DevelopmenUlnterim City Engineer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; James Troyer, Planning Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Lieutenant Don Yoder, Crime Analyst Ronda Maher and Administrative Secretary Debbie Cabana, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk. ...... H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of a Proclamations to Carmen Moreno and Eunice Hill in recognition of their being named the 2007/08 Outstanding School Crossing Guards of the Year. The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to Carmen Moreno (Eunice Hill was not present) assisted by Judy Homstad, R.C. Area Supervisor, All City Management. Carmen Moreno stated her goal is the safety of the kids. Judy Homstad, All City Management, talked about the dedication of both Ms. Moreno and Ms. Hill. H2. Presentation for the House Raffle Committee in recognition of their work to support the PAL Campaign and Certificates of Achievement for the Members of the Raffle Team. The certificates were presented to those involved with the PAL Campaign and Raffle Team. Tony Mize stated they have raised almost $500,000 to go towards the Cultural Center. A Proclamation, read by Councilmember Williams, was also presented to Susan Gray. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 3 I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Terry Masl spoke to the Council about homeless people and the tent city located in Ontario. He stated there are about 40 - 50 people in Ontario that have ties to Rancho Cucamonga. He mentioned the low to moderate income housing in Rancho Cucamonga and stated he is volunteering to be the liaison between Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. He said there needs to be a place these people can stay. He felt there were about 150 homeless in our City. He felt Ontario is setting the bar to help these people. He stated he wasn't aware of Rancho Cucamonga spending any money for this cause. He was hoping our City would establish a tent city to help people. He thought there was legislation that if it is identified there are over 100 homeless in your city, you must provide shelter for them. He didn't think the homeless would go away and hoped the City will work with him to assist the homeless in Rancho Cucamonga. 12. Stephen Yang wanted to invite everyone to their Critical Mass bicycle ride to show that bikes, cars, motorcycles can all ride together on the streets. He stated the event is Friday starting at REI on Foothill at about 7:00 a.m. for about 14 miles. He stated this occurs the 3rd Friday of every month at REI. He asked the participants to have proper equipment to be safe and that people obey the traffic laws. 13. John Lyons wanted to make sure there is a commitment from the Council there will be a public hearing before the homeless are located in the City. He felt this could be a major public safety issue and felt everyone needs to work on this as a team. He hoped everyone will shop and eat in RC. He mentioned riding his bike on the trail. He mentioned an event that Sacred Heart Church had last weekend. He stated he bought tickets for Tony Orlando which will be held in Rancho Cucamonga. He mentioned the efforts of the PAL Campaign and wished there would be two raffles every year. 14. Debbie Crow, A Safe Ride Home, was speaking for Justin Plummer who lost his life due to a drunk driver. She stated their organization has raised money and has been giving numerous rides home to those who have been drinking. She hoped the Council would support their cause. She also mentioned their Bingo event to raise money. She stated the number for a safe ride home is (800) 305-taxi which is connected to Yellow Cab or they can be contacted at www.forasaferidehome.com . 15. Jim Frost mentioned an FA86 that had crashed in Rancho Cucamonga years ago. He talked about the Run for the Wall event to start May 14. J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Councilmember Spagnolo talked about the new cell phone legislation to go into affect on July 1, 2008. He thanked Jim Frost for keeping the memory alive of the Viet Nam Vets. Councilmember Gutierrez mentioned the Run for the Wall event to occur on May 14 with all the motorcycles riding to Washington, D.C. He hoped the public will support this event. He encouraged people to support "For a Safe Ride Home," and hoped his colleagues will support it too. He didn't think the homeless in the City were as visible as they are in some cities. He stated the City is committed to helping these people, but added we will not have a tent city in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated Rancho Cucamonga is committed to addressing housing and all income levels in the City, and stated homelessness is a regional problem. He stated this is a very complex matter and will take a lot of forethought to resolve this issue. He talked about "For a Safe Ride Home" that was brought up before the Council a year ago and stated he takes his hat off to these people for their efforts and commitment. He felt their efforts will make our City safer. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 4 Councilmember Williams stated our City takes the homeless issue seriously. She stated our Mayor is involved in a regional group about this issue and hoped to hear more about their efforts. She mentioned the bike ride that was mentioned earlier, and talked about all the people that continue to use the trail. She stated on May 10 there will be the 3rd Annual Rancho Cucamonga Bicycle Ride to start at Central Park at 8:00 in the morning. Mayor Kurth stated the homeless issue is dear to his heart. He stated Rancho Cucamonga has no intention of having a tent city, but wants to work towards a solution to resolving this problem. He felt the Mayor of Ontario has tried very hard to help these people. He felt the homeless issue should be handled on a regional basis, and stated the Homeless Summit he is involved in is working towards a solution to this matter. He stated he also volunteers for an organization that tries to help people that are released from jail. He stated he loves the Critical Mass group and what they are doing. He felt "For a Safe Ride Home" was a good program. He also supports the efforts of Jim Frost. He felt everyone should support our veterans when they come home. , .,.,., K. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY K1. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, for the total amount of $811,917.48. K3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. K4. Approval to accept the Stadium Outfield Fence Replacement Project, Contract No. RA 08-003 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the Acting Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $54,105.45. RESOLUTION NO. RA 08-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE STADIUM OUTFIELD FENCE REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA 08-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORKS MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT L5. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting) , L8. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, for the total amount of $103,320.80. L7. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. L8. Approval to adopt a boundary map showing Parcel Number 0201-043-45 (Douglas & Linda Andresen), 9991 Snowdrop Rd., to be annexed into CFD 88-1. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. FD OS-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 L9. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 88- 08-1 (APN: 0201-043-45, Douglas & Linda Andresen), into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, specifying facilities and services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the annexation and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ...,., M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL M10. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2008 (regular meeting) M11. Approval of Check Register dated February 27 through March 11, 2008, and payroll ending March 11, 2008, for the total amount of $3,734,849.46.. M12. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2008. M13. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Citywide Street Name Sion Replacement. Phase 6, to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5300, as approved in the FY 2007/08 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 08-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 6, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M14. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. Nos. 1124303-5650/1582124-0,1124303-5650/1591124-0,1124303-5650/1592124-0. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 08-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M15. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/10922176 and Prop. 42 Funds, Acct. No. 1190303-5650/1022190. RESOLUTION NO. 08-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2007/2008 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M16. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Metrolink Railino Re- paint Project, to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District 3B Funds, Acct. No. 1133303-5304. RESOLUTION NO. 08-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE METROLINK RAILING RE-PAINT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M17. Approval of a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home' organization for the waiver of Central Park room rental fees for a fundraising event to be held on April 6, 2008. M18. Approval of a recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission to rename the Arrow Route Center. M19. Approval of a recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission to implement a Non- profit Organization Facility Use Eligibility Policy. M20. Approval of Community Services Update Report. M21. Approval of a Request from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for a Waiver of Rental Fees for use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on Friday, May 9th and Saturday May 10th, 2008, to conduct their Electric Lawn Mower Exchange Event. M22. A{~proval of a request from the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail for use of City equipment and marketing support for their Bike-A-Thon to be held May 10, 2008. M23. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2008/2009 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. OS-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 08-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO M24. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2008/2009 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 08-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 08-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO M25. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2008, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2008/2009 for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 08-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 08-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO M26. Approval of an Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-37) for storm drain improvements for Parcel Map 16141, located south of 9`" Street, east of Madrone Avenue, submitted by HC Vineyard, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 08-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (DRA-37) FOR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM HC VINEYARD, LLC M27. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $3,135,980.00 to the apparent low bidder, Mike Bubalo Construction Company, Inc. (CO 08- 024), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $313,598.00 for the Beryl Street Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Sunflower Street, to be funded from Drainage Funds, Acct. No. 1112303-5650/1505112-0 and Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1505176-0. M28. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation (CO 08-025) to provide engineering services for the design of traffic signals at four locations and the design of signal synchronization system and coordination timing at twelve intersections in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. Numbers: 1124303-5650/1042124-0, 1124303- 5650/1624124-0, 1124303-5650/1625124-0, 1124303-5650/1626124-0, and 1124303-5650/1643124-0, and approve an appropriation in the amount of $64,000.00 to Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1632124-0. M29. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $83,243.00 to the apparent low bidder, Wheeler Paving, Inc. (CO 08-026), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,324.30 for the Jasper StreeUOrchard Street Sidewalk Improvements (around Stork Elementary School), to be funded from Beautification Funds, Acct. N o. 1110316-5650/ 1661110-0. M30. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2005-00086, located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4`" Street, submitted by Trico TCH, Ltd. M31. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2003-00869, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6'" Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Co. M32. Approval to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 16167, located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9`" Street, submitted by On Vineyard, LLC. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 9 N. CONSENT ORDINANCES N1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District, Sub area 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for certification. This item and the Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the City Council for final action. ORDINANCE NO. 790 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) TO MIXED USE (MU) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, AND 14 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 790. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 790. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 01. PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REGARDING HEALTHY CITIES RESOLUTION NO. 08-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE HEALTHY CITIES MODEL AND INDICATING INTENT TO SUPPORT PARTICIPATION IN CALIFORNIA HEALTHY CITIES AND COMMUNITIES A staff report and power point were presented by Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager, which is on file in the City Clerks' office. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated the "healthy cities" initiative helps the community to get in a healthy mindset. He hoped this movement will set the standard for future Council's to follow. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he gives his full support toward this, and added he received something in the mail from a man that suggested used tires be mixed with asphalt to be used for street paving. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes March 19, 2008 Page 10 Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager, stated we already do this Councilmember Gutierrez stated this is really protecting our environment. He had some other information from someone that talked about solar power. He felt the City needs to look at the future for our kids and grandchildren. Councilmember Spagnolo mentioned the Sharps Program to keep needles out of landfills. He stated there are a lot of programs that the City is already involved in and will try to market them better. He stated Caryn School has a walking program and talked about their efforts towards the health of the students. Councilmember Williams stated Rancho Cucamonga is now a State identifiable healthy city and will be healthier. Mayor Kurth stated he supported the healthy cities initiative and hoped the City can keep making life better in the City. He stated he is proud of what the Council is doing to make the City a better place to live. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve Resolution No. 08-069. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 02. REPORT ON CRIME ANALYSIS (PowerPoint presentation) A recess was taken at 8:28 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:38 p.m. with all members present. Lieutenant Don Yoder introduced himself to the Council stating he was glad to be back in the City. He introduced Ronda Maher, Crime Analyst with the Police Department, to give the power point presentation for this item, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. A power point presentation was given by Ronda Maher, Crime Analyst. Mayor Pro Tem Michael asked if at a future meeting the Police Department could present their Graffiti Tracker Program early on in the meeting for the high school kids to see. ACTION: Report received and filed P. COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM P2 WAS DISCUSSED AT THIS TIME. THE MINUTES WILL REMAIN IN AGENDA ORDER P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo stated he is on OPARC Boardmember and mentioned the OPARC "Steppin' Out" Walk-a-Thon to occur on May 3rd at Upland Memorial Park and also a golf tournament to occur on September 15th. He also thanked the CVWD and the Metropolitan Water District for the 3-day tour of the water system he recently went on in northern California in San Joaquin Valley. He stated water is a major issue in the State and everyone needs to conserve water. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes • March 19, 2008 Page 11 Councilmember Gutierrez recognized the people here for the relay for life to occur on April 12 and 13 which is to raise funds for curing cancer. He stated that Hilda Phillips mentioned to him that we should promote arts and culture. He stated he went to a conference last week to promote the business community and went to'Vineyard Little League's opening ceremony. He stated a lot of people want to know when Wilson will be extended which would help with the traffic. He wanted to mention the idea to the rest of the Council the idea of requiring a business license for anyone renting out a home in the City. He brought up commercial vehicles over three tons not parking on the streets and felt this needed to be looked at. He felt banks that own foreclosed properties should be required to maintain the property. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated he and Councilmember Spagnolo attended a CVWD event regarding Frontier Project that dealt with sustainable buildings, energy conservation, etc. for the City. He encouraged our staff and architects to incorporate sustainability into our buildings whenever possible. Councilmember Williams felt we really need to get serious about sustainability of buildings in the City. She felt facilities should do something so water drains in the ground and not in the street. She felt developers should possibly be putting in a trail walk around their projects they are building. She stated she is looking forward to the April 2nd workshop. Mayor Kurth stated there are a few Councilmembers that will be attending the City/County Conference this week. He stated there is no plan for a tent city in Rancho Cucamonga, but added the City is sensitive to these issues. He stated our City is on sound financial ground considering what is going on with the economy throughout the Country. He stated he is glad to be Mayor of the City, and that the Council works very hard on all the issues. P2. CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION BOARD Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated he and Councilmember Gutierrez met on March 3 with Library Director Deborah Clark and that Tina Gilfrey and Chris White are being recommended to the Library Foundation to fill vacancies, and that Bruce Bowne is being recommended for reappointment. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the Subcommittee's recommendations. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ..,.__ Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. R. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC Assistant Secretary/Secretary/City Clerk Approved: ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/2S/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264499 3/12/2008 ALTEK MEDIA GROUP, THE 2,007.33 AP - 00264506 3/12/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,374.00 AP - 00264506 3/12/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 357.43 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,732.00 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00264529 3/12/2008 CAPITAL FUNDING SOLUTIONS 4,950.00 AP - 00264529 3/12/2008 CAPITAL FUNDING SOLUTIONS 4,950.00 AP - 00264537 3/12/2008 CIVIC STONE 1,282.50 AP - 00264543 3/12/2008 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,629.91 AP - 00264S6S 3/12/2008 FARAH INC, ELIE 2,800.00 AP - 00264591 3/12/2008 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 9,094.99 AP - 00264591 3/12/2008 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 902.30 AP - 00264591 3/12/2008 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 30.00 AP - 00264600 3/12/2008 INLAND EMPIRE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPM 5,000.00 AP - 00264614 3/12/2008 LEARNING EXPRESS 4,081.00 AP - 00264634 3/12/2008 MORNINGSTAR 795.00 AP - 00264642 3/12/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 3,029.13 AP - 00264642 3/12/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. SS8.24 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.66 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,844.21 AP - 00264647 3/12/2008 OSBY, TONIA 12,204.80 AP - 00264668 3/12/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 71.84 AP - 00264668 3/12/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 324.91 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,091.00 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 180.50 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 33.00 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 230.40 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,327.87 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1S2.S0 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 707.50 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 147.50 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 147.50 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,944.00 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,171.00 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AA'D GERSHON ] 31.00 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 192.50 AP - 00264682 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY LAND USE SERVICES E 112.50 AP - 00264735 3/13/2008 NIELSEN DECORATIVE IRON 9,580.00 AP - 00264763 3/19/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 221.47 AP - 00264806 3/19/2008 CORENET GLOBAL 10,000.00 AP - 00264892 3/19/2008 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 50,004.15 AP - 00264960 3/19/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 76,519.80 AP - 00264960 3/19/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -7,651.98 AP - 0026SOS2 3/19/2008 WITHERS & SANDGREN LTD 45,924.00 Total for Check ID AP: 260,212.46 Total for Entity: 260,212.46 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ] Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:14:0 STAFF REPORT R~1NCH0 CUCAlISONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY Date: April 2, 2008 To: Chairman and Members of Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director By: Robert Karatsu, Assistant Library Director . . RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,562,626, INCLUDING ONE BID ALTERNATE PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $156,262 TO THE APPARENT LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, GAMUT CONSTRUCTION OF MONTCLAIR, CA, FOR THE ARCHIBALD LIBRARY REMODEL PROJECT TO BE FUNDED BY AN APPROPIATION FROM FUND 640 FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 2640801/5602. Recommendation It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,562,626, including one bid alternate plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $156,262 to the apparent lowest responsive bidder, Gamut Construction of Montclair, CA, for the Archibald Library Remodel Project, to be funded by an appropriation from Fund 640 Fund Balance to Account No. 2640801/5602. Background Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 18, 2008, for the subject project. The Project Architect's estimate was $1,850,000. A total of nine bids were received. Staff reviewed all bids received and in consultation with the City Attorney found the lowest bid, JM Builders, to be non-responsive due to the lack of listing percentages of work to be performed by their subcontractors. In addition, staff in consultation with the City Attorney also ruled that the bids of DELT Builders, Diamond Construction, Fast-Track Construction, United Contractors, and Oakview Construction be declared non-responsive for the same reason of not listing percentages of work to be performed by their subcontractors. There were also three letters of protest received regarding various aspects of individual contractor's bids, which are on file with the City Clerk's office. All letters and their content were reviewed by staff and the City Attorney. However, staff has completed the required background investigation and recommends awarding the bid for the Archibald Library Remodel Project to Gamut Construction. As the second lowest responsible bid received, Gamut Construction meets the requirements of the bid documents. The Archibald Library Remodel Project scope of work in general consists of, but is not limited to, new carpeting, interior and exterior paint, wall covering, replacing the roof and HVAC system, creation of a dedicated technology center and a redesigned story theater. Respectfully submitted, Debor~ar~~ ~r~/ . Library Director P2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264495 3/12/2008 AIRGAS WEST 272.50 AP - 00264496 3/12/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 172.48 AP - 00264498 3/12/2008 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 738.90 AP - 00264498 3/12/2008 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 445.79 AP - 00264498 3/12/2008 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 449.14 AP - 00264503 3/12/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 656.10 AP - 00264508 3/12/2008 AT AND T 274.80 AP - 00264524 3/12/2008 BUDGET GRAPHICS & TRAILER 5,850.00 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.21 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.50 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 298.89 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 313.44 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 332.10 AP - 00264573 3/12/2008 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 865.00 AP - 00264574 3/12/2008 FIREMASTER 186.94 AP - 00264574 3/12/2008 FIREMASTER 186.94 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 141.92 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 28.62 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 425.61 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 167.83 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 160.98 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 647.60 AP - 00264579 3/12/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS -167.83 AP - 00264582 3/12/2008 G.T. ENGINEERING 748.86 AP - 00264583 3/12/2008 GALLS RETAIL CA LOCK BOX 418.61 AP - 00264583 3/12/2008 GALLS RETAIL CA LOCK BOX 415.92 AP - 00264583 3/12/2008 GALLS RETAIL CA LOCK BOX 428.04 AP - 00264583 3/12/2008 GALLS RETAIL CA LOCK BOX 428.04 AP - 00264602 3/12/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 29.00 AP - 00264615 3/12/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 16.89 AP - 00264615 3/12/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 193.05 AP - 00264617 3/12/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 31.32 AP - 00264617 3/12/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 189.99 AP - 00264617 3/12/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 54.14 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.58 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 379.26 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 112.83 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -39.85 AP-00264620 3/]2/2008 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 68.79 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.39 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.87 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.82 AP - 00264626 3/12/2008 MCCLIMAN, MICHAEL 135.25 AP - 00264627 3/12/2008 MCLEOD PLUMBING INC, SCOTT 1,242.81 AP - 00264633 3/12/2008 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES LP 145.14 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 221.32 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 39.37 AP - 00264638 3/12/2008 NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMERG MED TECHS 20.00 AP - 00264639 3/12/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 420.41 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -39.33 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 104.49 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.35 P3 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15x4:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. ~ Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ]77.53 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 47.43 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -127.33 AP - 00264686 3/12/2008 SEYMOUR, RONALD 130.00 AP - 00264688 3/12/2008 SMART AND FINAL 142.07 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 584.54 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.47 AP - 00264696 3/12/2008 SUN BADGE CO 636.11 AP - 00264703 3/12/2008 TEAM THOMPSON 75.00 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82 AP - 00264713 3/12/2008 VERIZON BUSINESS 8.00 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 21.34 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 21.35 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 100.51 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 100.51 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 8973 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 57.54 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 46.52 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 57.54 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 581.43 AP - 00264743 3/19/2008 AIRGAS WEST 51.40 AP - 00264745 3/19/2008 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 614.13 AP - 00264750 3/19/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 874.80 AP - 00264750 3/19/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,579.50 AP - 00264776 3/] 9/2008 CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 1,200.00 AP - 00264796 3/19/2008 CLF WAREHOUSE 61.93 AP - 00264796 3/19!2008 CLF WAREHOUSE 317.98 AP - 00264796 3/19/2008 CLF WAREHOUSE 84.73 AP - 00264796 3/19/2008 CLF WAREHOUSE 12.02 AP - 00264797 3/19/2008 CLOUGHESY, DONALD 26.92 AP - 00264805 3/19/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 111.60 AP - 00264835 3/19/2008 DOI/BLM 11.47 AP - 00264835 3/19/2008 DOI/BLM 5.05 AP - 00264842 3/19/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 910.06 AP - 00264843 3/19/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 1,067.71 AP - 00264843 3/19/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 1,250.00 AP - 00264845 3/19/2008 EPSTEIN, SHAWN 494.14 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 195.90 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 415.13 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 398.52 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 450.57 AP - 00264852 3/19/2008 FLEETPRIDE 38.83 AP - 00264853 3/19/2008 FLEETPRIDE 29.79 AP - 00264856 3/ 19/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 131.98 AP - 00264856 3/19/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 2 37 AP - 00264856 3/19/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 48.88 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 415.92 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 AP - 00264859 3/19/2008 GALLS INC 428.04 P4 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:14:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 10.56 AP - 00264884 3/19/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 5.40 AP - 00264884 3/19/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 32.49 AP - 00264884 3/19/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 19.35 AP - 00264899 3/19/2008 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 35.00 AP - 00264903 3/19/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 91.50 AP - 00264909 3/19/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 1,689.19 AP - 00264913 3/19/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 4,121.44 AP - 00264926 3/19/2008 MEDINA, BREANNA 39.60 AP - 00264927 3/19/2008 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM 1,757.56 AP - 00264936 3/19/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 412.28 AP - 00264940 3/19/2008 NOREEN, ERIC S. 47.35 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 78.55 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7268 AP - 00264956 3/19/2008 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 212.15 AP - 00264963 3/19/2008 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 110.00 AP - 00264964 3/19/2008 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 135.00 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 6,425.56 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 5,131.34 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 3,198.56 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 3,859.86 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 1,546.24 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 1,026.27 AP - 00265012 3/19/2008 SUN BADGE CO 710.49 AP - 00265017 3/19/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP - 00265017 3/19/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 63.00 AP - 00265017 3/19/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 75.00 AP - 00265024 3/19/2008 TOWNSEND, JIM 53.88 AP - 00265025 3/19/2008 TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA 22.00 AP - 00265028 3/19/2008 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC 2,775.00 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 35.09 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 534.99 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 20.10 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 33.49 AP - 00265054 3/19/2008 XEROX CORPORATION 94.43 Total for Check ID AP: 70,163.10 Total for Entity: 70,163.10 P5 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:14:4 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: April 2, 2008 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP NO 88-08-2 RECOMMENDATION RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Adoption of a resolution adopting a boundary map showing property (located at 10059 Snowdrop Rd.) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. BACKGROUND Peter & Heather Thuresson (APN: 0201-043-54) is conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the referenced parcel into CFD No. 88-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation boundary map is presented for Board consideration and approval. The boundary map (Exhibit "A") illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire project. Respectfully submitted, ~~i~ P6 Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief ANNEXATION MAP NO. 88-08-2 OF EXHIBIT FAI COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~NO`N DROP ROAD Mea•unsw. nl sr-~ ~~ ~~ ~ \ srs3E~r.rm _ PARCEl1 PARCEL MAP NO. ISBaS P. M. B. 3039185 PARCELS PARCEL MAP N0. 15335 P. M. B. 30YGSWl BODNOARY MNE~ ppRCELJ PARCEL MAP GM.158a5 p M. B. 3039JPo PARCEL/ PARLEI MAP NO. 153s5 PM B.30353E9 NOTE: iX13 ANNEXATION MAP 311FLL GOVERN FOP ALL DETAILS AS TO TXE E%TENT OF THE LERftITORY ANNEXED i0 THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMMUNITY FACILITIES pSTRILi. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 90F PARCEL MAP N0. 15195, IN TXE COUNTY OF SAN BERN4RDIN0, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RELOROEDIN BOOK 3030E PARCEL MAPS, PAGES B3 THROUGH 58, INCWSIVE. RECORDS OF SAIDCOIIMY. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION FILED IN TXE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE RANCXO LVGMONGA FIRE PROTECTION pl$iRILi, CALIFORNIA, TH13 WY 3W_ RANCHO LUGMONGA FIRE PROTECTION pSTRIGi STATE OF CALIFORNIA I XERESY CERTIFY TH4T THE WITHIN MAP SHOVING SOVNWRIES OFTERRITORY PROPOSED i0 BE ANNESEO TO COMMUNItt FACILITIES PSTRILT NO. S&I OF THE RANCHO LLYAMONG5 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. C/JUNTY OF SAN RERN4ROIN0, STATE OF CALIFORNIP, WAS APPROVED SY THE DOARp OF pRELTORS OF SUCX FIRE PROTECTION OISTRICTAi A REGULAR MEETING TXEREOF HELOON TXE MYOF P3_. SV Ii5 RESOLU110N NO. TNIS ANNEXATION M4P AMENDS THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR PROTECTION pSTRICi, COUNTY OF S4N BERNPRDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRIOR RECpflOON AT SOOK OF MAP90F ASSESSMEM ANp COMMVNItt FACILITIES DISTRICTS, AT PAGE, IN THE OFFlCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN RERN4ROIN0, STATE OF GLIFORNIA. PANCMO LUUMONG4 FIRE PftOIELIION DISTRICT STATE Of GLIFORNIA Y. VICINITY MAP THOMAS GUIDE MW SAN BENN4NOIN0 COVNry PG 5]3, GRIDA-1 THIS MM XAB BEEN FIIEO UNDER WCVMEM NUMBER TXISOAY OF ID]l. AiM, IN 900N OFM^-b OFAS5E55MEM ANO COMMUNITY FACILITIES OISTRILiSAi PAGE_~ Ai THE REQUEST Of IN LXE PNOUM OF S WiRV WN%ER PVOITORICONIPOLLER~RECORCER LOONEY OG SAN BERNWdAV STATE OF CPLIFONNIA P7 P8 RESOLUTION NO. FD 08- ~~) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Boundary Map No. 88-08-2 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Boundary Map') showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: The Boundary Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of Boundary Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. - _{+..._ STAFF REPORT - RANQ-IO C[JCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT' RANOHO Date: April 2, 2008 cUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 88-08-2 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, to specify facilities and services to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation. BACKGROUND Peter & Heather Thuresson (APN: 0201-043-54) is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving a boundary map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex; (b) the facilities and services which the annexed property will, in part, finance (Exhibit "A" of said Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the annexed property; (d) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution); (e) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for May 7, 2008; and (f) election requirements. P9 Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolution is considered to be P10 RESOUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX APRIL 2, 2008 PAGE 2 routine and non-controversial, as the property owner is in support of the annexation procedure. On May 7, 2008, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. Respectfully submitted, Peter M. B an Fire Chief Attachment P11 RESOLUTION NO. FD 08- ©~~ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-08-2 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Boundary Map")showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. LEGAL AUTHORITY SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. P12 INTENTION TO ANNEX; DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. A description of the Territory is as follows All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Boundary Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on maps of the original District and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the original District. Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. SERVICES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Services") are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Services. The Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within District are the types of services to be provided in the Territory. If and to the extent possible the Services shall be provided in common within the District and the Territory. SPECIAL TAXES SECTION 5: It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the P13 proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services in the District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the original District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Special Tax Formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District. PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 7th DAY OF MAY 2008, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. P14 AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES W (THIN THE TERRITORY OR ANY OTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON. ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. MAJORITY PROTEST SECTION 7: If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, ar six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District, or (d)owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the Territory, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. ELECTION SECTION 8: Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, if the legislative body determines to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. NOTICE SECTION 9: Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. P15 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. P16 EXHIBIT B COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-2 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 TAXING CLASSIFICATION 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class Vll (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property 2. APPROVED PROPERTY 3. VACANT PROPERTY SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 $433.19 $333.87 $265.66 $232.16 $201.03 $183.10 $165.13 $666.54 per acre or $0.059 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. $200.00 per lot or parcel $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet P16-1 STAFF REPORT It~1NCHO CUG9MONG~1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: April 2, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic~~s~~(L Subject: Approval of Resolution Fixing the Employer's Contribution~'U'n'Cd~er~t~he Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act, and Agreements Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Local 2274, Fire Support Services Association, and Fire Management Employees Group, Stating the Same. Recommendation It is recommended the Board of Directors adopt the attached resolution fixing the District's medical contribution for Fire District employees under the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) at the minimum amount required under Section 22982(b) of the Act and approve agreements with the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Local 2274, Fire Support Services Association, and Fire Management Employees Group stating the same. Backnround The current Memorandum of Understanding between the Fire District and its employees has, since 1994, provided two tiers of health insurance coverage for employee and family members. Recently, the District learned that the two tier provisions did not conform to current PEMHCA requirements. The MOUs provide that, in situations such as this, the District and employees may "reopen negotiations regarding the affected MOU provision with the understanding that the total compensation to the employees shall not be reduced or increased". Representatives of the District and employees covered by the respective MOUs have met and conferred on new procedures that conform to current PEMHCA requirements. The attached "Side Letter of Agreement" between the District and the Firefighters Local 2274, Fire Management Employees and Fire Support Services Association, amends the medical provision of their respective MOUs to comply with PEMHCA regulations, and outlines the procedure for implementing the new provision. Overall, total employee compensation and benefits have not been increased or decreased, but merely restructured as required by PEMHCA. In order to implement the MOU provisions, the California Public Employees Retirement System also requires that the District adopt a new resolution fixing the employer's contribution under PEMHCA at the minimum amount required under Section 22982(b) of the Act. Attachments Stag Report-PEMHCA-April 2, 2008.doc P 16-2 RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT Whereas, Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a local agency contracting under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (the "Act") shall fix the amount of the employer's contribution at an amount not less than the amount required under Section 22892(b) of the Act; and Whereas, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is a local agency under the Act; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The employer's contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of family members in a health benefits plan up to the minimum amount required under Section 22892(b) of the Act, plus administrative fees and Contingency Reserve Fund assessments. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of April 2008. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, MD, President Attest: Debra J. Adams, Secretary P16-3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIItE PROTECTION DISTRICT AI\~ THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters' Association ("RCPFA") have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") covering the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (2) of the MOU provides for a fully paid employee and family health insurance program for all existing full-time continuous employees and retirees as of November 17, 1994; WHEREAS, Article R, Section 5 (A) (2) also provides that "such health benefits are vested for all full time continuous and retired employees as of November 17, 1994"; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (3) of the MOU sets forth that the District will provide fully paid employee and family health insurance for all full-time continuous employees hired after November 17, 1994, at the lowest fully paid family insurance plan offered through the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA") program; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (4) of the MOU provides that employees hired after November 17, 1994, shall be responsible for paying all premiums for medical insurance through PEMHCA, upon their retirement (i.e., the District shall not provide retiree insurance to employees hired after November 17, 1994); WHEREAS, the District learned that the existing structure of its medical insurance benefit is potentially suspended or superseded by provisions of the Government Code; WHEREAS, Article X of the MOU provides for the District and employees "to reopen negotiations regarding the suspended or superseded [...j provision with the understanding that the total compensation to employees under [the) MOU shall not be reduced or increased [...]; WHEREAS, the District and RCPFA engaged in negotiations concerning medical insurance benefits and have agreed to modify the MOU to reflect the mutual agreement of the parties as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, both the District and RCPFA wish to avoid and resolve all actual or potential grievances, disputes, controversies, claims, and actions between them regarding the level and mechanism of providing contracted medical insurance benefits owed to pre and post November 17, 1994, employees and retirees in order to make their peace and avoid the uncertainties of litigation, investigation or review, and the expenses and costs incident thereto; 1 of 7 P 16-4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES do hereby agree as follows: For emplovees and retirees hired on or before 11/17/94: Employees and retirees hired on or before November 17, 1994 have a vested right to fully paid medical insurance for the employee/retiree an any eligible dependents according to whatever plan is selected by the employee/retiree. 2. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend it's resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. In addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set for in paragraph 2, above, the District and RCPFA have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee and retiree hired on or before November 17; 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the health insurance plan selected by the employee/retiree for the employee/retiree and eligible dependents. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 2, above. 3.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits are intended to benon-taxable, to the extent permitted by law. 3.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in paragraph 1, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PERS directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there are adverse tax consequences to the employee/retiree the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 4. The reimbursement set forth in paragraph 3, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee or retiree at the beginning of each calendar month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee or retiree and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employee/retiree be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carrier. The District will use records available from Ca1PERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee and/or retiree. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from CaIPERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 2 of 7 P 16-5 5. The right of a surviving spouse and/or dependents of a deceased active employee or retiree to continue to receive District paid retiree medical benefits described in paragraphs 1-4, above, is dependent upon either (1) the Ca1PERS pension option selected by the retiree, or (2) the continued right of such persons to participate in PEMHCA upon the death of an active employee. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does not provide for continuing benefits to be paid to the retiree's surviving spouse/dependents will not be entitled to receive District paid retiree medical benefits upon the death of the retiree. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does provide for a survivors continued pension, will receive District paid benefits for life. Should the District no longer participate in PEMHCA, the rights of a surviving spouse or dependents to District paid retiree medical benefits is likewise premised upon the retirement option selected by the retiree or the survivors continued right to a pension allowance from Ca1PERS. The right to receive fully paid medical insurance for employees/retirees and their eligible dependents maybe modified only by the mutual written agreement of the District and the individual employee or retiree affected. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, are matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, may be modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. For emplovees and retirees hired after l1/17/94: Employees hired after November 17, 1994 have a right while employed by the District to fully paid medical insurance for the employee and any eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered. Upon retirement, such employees have no right to District paid health benefits, except as maybe mandated under PEMHCA. 8. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend its resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. In addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set forth in paragraph 8, above, the District and RCPFA have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee hired after November 17, 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the plan selected by the employee and eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family health insurance plan offered by the District. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 8, above. 3 of 7 P 16-6 9.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits are intended to be non-taxable, to the extent permitted by law. 9.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in paragraph 7, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PERS directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there aze adverse tax consequences for the employee, the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 10. The reimbursement set forth in paragraph 9, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee at the beginning of each calendar month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employee shall be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carrier. The District will use records available from CaIPERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from Ca1PERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 11. The right of an active employee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents may be modified only by (1) the mutual written agreement of the District and RCPFA, or (2) a health insurance mandate providing for contribution levels for active employees and dependents that are equal to, or exceed, the level provided herein. The District acknowledges that the right of an active employee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered is not subject to unilateral modification by the District, including under Government Code Section 3505.4 or rules and regulations adopted under Government Code Section 3507. 12. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, are matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, may be modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. 4of7 P16-7 Provisions applicable to all employees and retirees reeardless of hire date: 13. The parties acknowledge that the decision to participate in PEMHCA is subject to the duty to meet and confer in good faith. In the event the District unilaterally implements a change in health insurance benefit providers or plans (in compliance with its meet-and-confer obligations and after exhausting applicable impasse procedures, if any), any such subsequent provider or plan must offer alowest-cost family plan that has benefit levels that are, at a minimum, substantially similar to the benefit levels of the then-current plan available through PEMHCA. 14. No waiver by any party of any breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall be construed to be, nor be, a waiver of any preceding, concurrent or succeeding breach of the same or any other term or provision hereof. No waiver shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the party to be chazged or held bound. 15. Should any provision of this Agreement be declared or determined by any court to be illegal or invalid, the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said illegal or invalid part, term or provisions shall be deemed not to be part of this Agreement. Neither the District nor RCPFA shall take or support any action to declare any part, provision or benefit herein to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable. 16. The recitals herein shall be deemed an integral part of this Agreement. 17. The parties and individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that each of them has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party on whose behalf said person is purporting to execute this Agreement. 18. There shall be no modification of this Agreement except in writing signed by the parties affected thereby. This agreement is independent of the existing MOU, or any subsequent MOUs and its terms shall survive expiration of such MOLJs. 19. This Agreement is binding upon, and shall insure to the benefit of, the heirs, executors, administrators, officers, elected officials, representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto and each of them. 20. The above Agreement shall be effective as of the date of the last signature on the Agreement. 5 of 7 P 16-8 IT IS AGREED: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 APPROVED AS TO FORM James Markman City Attorney 6of7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Jack Lam Chief Executive Officer ATTEST Date Debra J. Adams, CMC Date City Clerk Date Representative P 16-9 Rick Clabby Date Susan DeAntonio Date Mike Ploung Date Vic Rodriguez Date Steve Campbell Date Paul Lenze Date Jim Dague Date Steve Kilmer Date Bob Eggers Date Gerry Campbell Date Mike Redmond Date Bill Kirkpatrick Date Pat Proulx Date Kevin Walton Date Jim Townsend Date Jeff Roeder Date Scott Sorensen Date Brent Roberts Date Tim Fejeran Date Mike Jerkins Date Dave Larkin Date Pete Magnuson Date Eric Noreen Date Rich Toll Date Danny Holt Date Jay Davenport Date Cheryl Roberts Date Tom O'Brien Date Ivan Rojer Date 7 of 7 P16-10 AGREEMENT BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BARGAINING GROUP WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Management Employees Bargaining Group ("Fire MEG") have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") covering the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (2) of the MOU provides for a fully paid employee and family health insurance program for all existing full-time continuous employees and retirees as of November 17, 1994; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (2) also provides that "such health benefits are vested for all full time continuous and retired employees as of November 17, 1994"; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (3) of the MOU sets forth that the District will provide fully paid employee and family health insurance for all full-time continuous employees hired after November 17, 1994, at the lowest fully paid family insurance plan offered through the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA") program; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (4) of the MOU provides that employees hired after November 17, 1994, shall be responsible for paying all premiums for medical insurance through PEMHCA, upon their retirement (i.e., the District shall not provide retiree insurance to employees hired after November 17, 1994); WHEREAS, the District learned that the existing structure of its medical insurance benefit is potentially suspended or superseded by provisions of the Government Code; WHEREAS, Article X of the MOU provides for the District and employees "to reopen negotiations regarding the suspended or superseded [...] provision with the understanding that the total compensation to employees under [the] MOU shall not be reduced or increased [...]; WHEREAS, the District and Fire MEG engaged in negotiations concerning medical insurance benefits and have agreed to modify the MOU to reflect the mutual agreement of the parties as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, both the District and Fire MEG wish to avoid and resolve all actual or potential grievances, disputes, controversies, claims, and actions between them regarding the level and mechanism of providing contracted medical insurance benefits owed to pre and post November 17, 1994, employees and retirees in order to make their peace and avoid the uncertainties of litigation, investigation or review, and the expenses and costs incident thereto; 1 of7 P16-11 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES do hereby agree as follows: For emplovees and retirees hired on or before 11/17/94: Employees and retirees hired on or before November 17, 1994 have a vested right to fully paid medical insurance for the employee/retiree an any eligible dependents according to whatever plan is selected by the employee/retiree. 2. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend it's resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. In addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set for in pazagraph 2, above, the District and Fire MEG have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee and retiree hired on or before November 17, 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the health insurance plan selected by the employee/retiree for the employee/retiree and eligible dependents. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 2, above. 3.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits aze intended to benon-taxable, to the extent permitted by law. 3.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in paragraph 1, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PERS directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there are adverse tax consequences to the employee/retiree the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 4. The reimbursement set forth in pazagraph 3, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee or retiree at the beginning of each calendaz month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee or retiree and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employeehetiree be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carrier. The District will use records available from Ca1PERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee and/or retiree. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from Ca1PERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 2 of 7 P16-12 5. The right of a surviving spouse and/or dependents of a deceased active employee or retiree to continue to receive District paid retiree medical benefits described in paragraphs 1-4, above, is dependent upon either (1) the Ca1PERS pension option selected by the retiree, or (2) the continued right of such persons to participate in PEMHCA upon the death of an active employee. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does not provide for continuing benefits to be paid to the retiree's surviving spouse/dependents will not be entitled to receive District paid retiree medical benefits upon the death of the retiree. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does provide for a survivors continued pension, will receive District paid benefits for life. Should the District no longer participate in PEMHCA, the rights of a surviving spouse or dependents to District paid retiree medical benefits is likewise premised upon the retirement option selected by the retiree or the survivors continued right to a pension allowance from Ca1PERS. 6. The right to receive fully paid medical insurance for employees/retirees and their eligible dependents may be modified only by the mutual written agreement of the District and the individual employee or retiree affected. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, are matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, maybe modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. For emplovees and retirees hired after 11/17/94: Employees hired after November 17, 1994 have a right while employed by the District to fully paid medical insurance for the employee and any eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered. Upon retirement, such employees have no right to District paid health benefits, except as may be mandated under PEMHCA. 8. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend its resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. L2 addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set forth in paragraph 8, above, the District and Fire MEG have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee hired after November 17, 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the plan selected by the employee and eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family health insurance plan offered by the District. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 8, above. 3 of 7 P16-13 9.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits aze intended to benon-taxable, to the extent permitted by law. 9.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in paragraph 7, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PER5 directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there are adverse tax consequences for the employee, the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 10. The reimbursement set forth in paragraph 9, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee at the beginning of each calendar month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employee shall be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carrier. The District will use records available from Ca1PERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from Ca1PERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 11. The right of an active employee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents may be modified only by (1) the mutual written agreement of the District and FIRE MEG, or (2) a health insurance mandate providing for contribution levels for active employees and dependents that are equal to, or exceed, the level provided herein. The District acknowledges that the right of an active employee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered is not subject to unilateral modification by the District, including under Government Code Section 3505.4 or rules and regulations adopted under Govemment Code Section 3507. 12. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, are matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, may be modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. 4of7 P16-14 Provisions applicable to all employees and retirees reeardless of hire date: 13. The parties acknowledge that the decision to participate in PEMHCA is subject to the duty to meet and confer in good faith. In the event the District unilaterally implements a change in health insurance benefit providers or plans (in compliance with its meet-and-confer obligations and after exhausting applicable impasse procedures, if any), any such subsequent provider or plan must offer alowest-cost family plan that has benefit levels that are, at a minimum, substantially similar to the benefit levels of the then-current plan available through PEMHCA. 14. No waiver by any party of any breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall be construed to be, nor be, a waiver of any preceding, concurrent or succeeding breach of the same or any other term or provision hereof. No waiver shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the party to be chazged or held bound. 15. Should any provision of this Agreement be declazed or determined by any court to be illegal or invalid, the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said illegal or invalid part, term or provisions shall be deemed not to be part of this Agreement. Neither the District nor FII2E MEG shall take or support any action to declare any part, provision or benefit herein to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable. 16. The recitals herein shall be deemed an integral part of this Agreement. 17. The parties and individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that each of them has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party on whose behalf said person is purporting to execute this Agreement. 18. There shall be no modification of this Agreement except in writing signed by the parties affected thereby. This agreement is independent of the existing MOU, or any subsequent MOUs and its terms shall survive expiration of such MOUs. 19. This Agreement is binding upon, and shall insure to the benefit of, the heirs, executors, administrators, officers, elected officials, representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto and each of them. 20. The above Agreement shall be effective as of the date of the last signature on the Agreement. 5 of 7 P16-15 IT IS AGREED: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE M.E.G Mi e Bell, Date Representative APPROVED AS TO FORM James Markman City Attorney RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Jack Lam Chief Executive Officer ATTEST Date Debra J. Adams, CMC Date City Clerk Date 6of7 P16-16 David Bed „~ Date Bell ~~ D~ Date • ti. (~ Mike Costello 3-l~,r~' Date 7- 6of6 P16-17 AGREEMENT BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Support Services Association ("RCFSSA") have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") covering the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (2) of the MOU provides for a fully paid employee and family health insurance program for all existing full-time continuous employees and retirees as of November 17, 1994; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (2) also provides that "such health benefits aze vested for all full time continuous and retired employees as of November 17, 1994"; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (3) of the MOU sets forth that the District will provide fully paid employee and family health insurance for all full-time continuous employees hired after November 17, 1994, at the lowest fully paid family insurance plan offered through the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA") program; WHEREAS, Article II, Section 5 (A) (4) of the MOU provides that employees hired after November 17, 1994, shall be responsible for paying all premiums for medical insurance through PEMHCA, upon their retirement (i.e., the District shall not provide retiree insurance to employees hired after November 17, 1994); WHEREAS, the District learned that the existing structure of its medical insurance benefit is potentially suspended or superseded by provisions of the Government Code; WHEREAS, Article X of the MOU provides for the District and employees "to reopen negotiations regazding the suspended or superseded [...]provision with the understanding that the total compensation to employees under [the] MOU shall not be reduced or increased [...]; WHEREAS, the District and RCFSSA engaged in negotiations concerning medical insurance benefits and have agreed to modify the MOU to reflect the mutual agreement of the parties as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, both the District and RCFSSA wish to avoid and resolve all actual or potential grievances, disputes, controversies, claims, and actions between them regarding the level and mechanism of providing contracted medica] insurance benefits owed to pre and post November 17, 1994, employees and retirees in order to make their peace and avoid the uncertainties of litigation, investigation or review, and the expenses and costs incident thereto; 1 of 7 P16-18 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES do hereby agree as follows: For emplovees and retirees hired on or before 11/17/94: Employees and retirees hired on or before November 17, 1994 have a vested right to fully paid medical insurance for the employee/retiree an any eligible dependents according to whatever plan is selected by the employee/retiree. 2. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend it's resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. 3. In addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set for in paragraph 2, above, the District and RCFSSA have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee and retiree hired on or before November 17, 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the health insurance plan selected by the employee/retiree for the employee/retiree and eligible dependents. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 2, above. 3.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits are intended to be non-taxable, to the extent permitted bylaw. 3.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in paragraph 1, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PERS directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there are adverse tax consequences to the employee/retiree the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 4. The reimbursement set forth in paragraph 3, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee or retiree at the beginning of each calendar month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee or retiree and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employee/retiree be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carver. The District will use records available from Ca1PERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee and/or retiree. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from Ca1PERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 2of7 P16-19 5. The right of a surviving spouse and/or dependents of a deceased active employee or retiree to continue to receive District paid retiree medical benefits described in paragraphs 1-4, above, is dependent upon either (1) the Ca1PERS pension option selected by the retiree, or (2) the continued right of such persons to participate in PEMHCA upon the death of an active employee. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does not provide for continuing benefits to be paid to the retiree's surviving spouse/dependents will not be entitled to receive District paid retiree medical benefits upon the death of the retiree. The surviving spouse or dependents of a retiree that selects a pension option that does provide for a survivors continued pension, will receive District paid benefits for life. Should the District no longer participate in PEMHCA, the rights of a surviving spouse or dependents to District paid retiree medical benefits is likewise premised upon the retirement option selected by the retiree or the survivors continued right to a pension al]owance from Ca1PERS. 6. The right to receive fully paid medical insurance for employees/retirees and their eligible dependents may be modified only by the mutual written agreement of the District and the individual employee or retiree affected. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, are matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, maybe modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. For emplovees and retirees hired after 11/17/94: Employees hired afer November 17, 1994 have a right while employed by the District to fully paid medical insurance for the employee and any eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered. Upon retirement, such employees have no right to District paid health benefits, except as may be mandated under PEMHCA. 8. The Parties have agreed that the District shall amend its resolution under PEMHCA to provide that the District shall pay on behalf of all active employees, retirees and eligible dependents the statutory minimum contribution for medical insurance mandated under PEMHCA. 9. In addition to paying the PEMHCA statutory minimum set forth in paragraph 8, above, the District and RCFSSA have agreed to establish a flexible benefit package that will reimburse to each eligible active employee hired after November 17, 1994, the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the plan selected by the employee and eligible dependents, not to exceed the cost of the ]east expensive family health insurance plan offered by the District. The flexible benefit package will be effective coincident with the effective date of the change outlined in paragraph 8, above. 3 of7 P 16-20 9.1 The District's payments for medical insurance benefits are intended to benon-taxable, to the extent permitted bylaw. 9.2 If, as a result of modifying the delivery mechanism of the insurance benefits set forth in pazagraph 7, above, from one wherein the District paid Ca1PERS directly for 100% of the cost of insurance benefits for employees/retirees and eligible dependents, it is determined at any time in the future there aze adverse tax consequences for the employee, the District shall be required to augment its reimbursement by whatever amount is necessary to cause the employee/retiree to be made whole, as if the reimbursement were delivered in atax-exempt manner. 10. The reimbursement set forth in paragraph 9, above, shall be accomplished by paying the employee at the beginning of each calendaz month the difference between the PEMHCA statutory minimum and the amount of the health insurance premium for the employee and eligible dependents. The parties intend that, to the extent possible, the employee shall be reimbursed prior to the time payment is due to the insurance carrier. The District will use records available from Ca1PERS to verify employee or retiree enrollment in health insurance and to ascertain the amount it owes to each employee. If the District cannot obtain sufficient information from Ca1PERS to determine the enrollment and premium amounts, it may require employees and retirees to provide appropriate proof of enrollment and premium payments. 11. The right of an active emp]oyee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents maybe modified only by (1) the mutual written agreement of the District and RCFSSA, or (2) a health insurance mandate providing for contribution levels for active employees and dependents that are equal to, or exceed, the level provided herein. The District acknowledges that the right of an active employee hired after November 17, 1994 to receive a District contribution for fully paid medical insurance for the employee and eligible dependents not to exceed the cost of the least expensive family plan offered is not subject to unilateral modification by the District, including under Government Code Section 3505.4 or rules and regu]ations adopted under Government Code Section 3507. 12. Other aspects of the health insurance benefits for employees and retirees, including but not limited to the District's continued participation in PEMHCA and the structure of the District's insurance plans, aze matters controlled by the MOU and the collective bargaining process and, accordingly, maybe modified in a subsequent MOU or as otherwise permitted by law. 4of7 P 16-21 Provisions applicable to all employees and retirees reeardless of hire date: 13. The parties acknowledge that the decision to pazticipate in PEMHCA is subject to the duty to meet and confer in good faith. In the event the District unilaterally implements a change in health insurance benefit providers or plans (in compliance with its meet-and-confer obligations and after exhausting applicable impasse procedures, if any), any such subsequent provider or plan must offer alowest-cost family plan that has benefit levels that aze, at a minimum, substantially similar to the benefit levels of the then-current plan available through PEMHCA. 14. No waiver by any party of any breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall be construed to be, nor be, a waiver of any preceding, concurrent or succeeding breach of the same or any other term or provision hereof. No waiver shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the party to be chazged or held bound. 15. Should any provision of this Agreement be declared or determined by any court to be illegal or invalid, the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said illegal or invalid part, term or provisions shall be deemed not to be part of this Agreement. Neither the District nor RCFSSA shall take or support any action to declare any part, provision or benefit herein to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable. 16. The recitals herein shall be deemed an integral part of this Agreement. 17. The parties and individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that each of them has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party on whose behalf said person is purporting to execute this Agreement. 18. There shall be no modification of this Agreement except in writing signed by the parties affected thereby. This agreement is independent of the existing MOU, or any subsequent MOUs and its terms shall survive expiration of such MOUs. 19. This Agreement is binding upon, and shall insure to the benefit of, the heirs, executors, administrators, officers, elected officials, representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto and each of them. 20. The above Agreement shall be effective as of the date of the last signature on the Agreement. 5 of 7 P 16-22 IT IS AGREED: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOC. fiche le Seckler, Date Representative APPROVED AS TO FORM James Markman City Attorney RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Jack Lam Chief Executive Officer ATTEST Date Debra J. Adams, CMC Date City Clerk Date 6 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3!25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264491 3/12/2008 A&V SOFTBALL 2,093.00 AP - 00264492 3/12/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 67.88 AP - 00264492 3/12/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 78.41 AP - 00264492 3/12/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 113.14 AP - 00264492 3/12/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 117.21 AP - 00264493 3/12/2008 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,665.82 AP - 00264493 3/12/2008 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,381.94 AP - 00264494 3/12/2008 ACTIVE NETWORK, THE 850.00 AP - 00264495 3/12/2008 AIRGAS WEST 37.71 AP - 00264497 3/12/2008 ALL WELDING 136.16 AP - 00264497 3/12/2008 ALL WELDING 186.54 AP - 00264497 3/12/2008 ALL WELDING 256.16 AP - 00264497 3/12/2008 ALL WELDING 69.62 AP - 00264500 3/12/2008 AMC THEATRES VICTORIA GARDENS 12 99.00 AP - 00264501 3/12/2008 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 465.00 AP - 00264502 3/12/2008 ANDRADE, LAINI 31.31 AP - 00264504 3/12/2008 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 57.60 AP - 00264504 3/12/2008 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 6,950.85 AP - 00264505 3/12/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 228.43 AP - 00264507 3/12/2008 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 377.13 AP - 00264509 3/12/2008 AT&T 1,344.23 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 4,912.00 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 4,000.00 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,000.00 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,500.00 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,000.00 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 9,462.50 AP - 00264510 3/12/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 540.00 AP - 00264511 3/12/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS 634.71 AP - 00264512 3/12/2008 AX-IT INTERNATIONAL 692.95 AP - 00264513 3/12/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 25,863.15 AP - 00264513 3/12/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 1,299.68 AP - 00264514 3/12/2008 BASELINE DENTAL PRACTICE 371.32 AP - 00264515 3/12/2008 BEAR STATE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CORPOR. 3,758.83 AP - 002645 ] 6 3/12/2008 BERG, RONALD 5,000.00 AP - 00264517 3/12/2008 BLINDS ETC. 754.25 AP - 00264518 3/12/2008 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 148,993.92 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.86 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.78 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS ] 71.99 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 191.40 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.73 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 44.93 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS ] 8.39 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 44.16 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.77 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.96 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 47.30 P17 Uscr: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 Agenda Check Ret=ister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.95 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.95 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 0.00 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.99 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 37.65 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 71.68 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.05 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.93 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.70 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.32 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 44.83 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.85 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.54 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 44.88 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART IIOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 03/26/200 ReporhCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2770 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.08 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1277 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 74.62 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 34.06 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.42 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 290.55 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.28 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 97.94 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2775 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 79.03 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2775 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.S 1 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS S 1.24 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 P19 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.4] AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.19 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.54 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.67 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.49 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.12 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.40 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.40 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 87.72 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.76 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.46 AP - 00264523 3/12/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.46 AP - 00264525 3/12/2008 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 401.55 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,365.04 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 949.04 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,400.00 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 6,682.12 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 465.54 AP - 00264526 3/12/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 833.57 AP - 00264527 3/12/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 3 ] 8.57 AP - 00264528 3/12/2008 CALIFORNIA APPRAISAL 30.00 AP - 00264530 3/12/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03 AP - 00264530 3/12/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 125.11 AP - 00264530 3/12/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03 AP - 00264531 3/12/2008 CARDENAS, NOE 498.00 AP - 00264532 3/12/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 90.51 AP - 00264533 3/12/2008 CHAFFEE HOME MAINTENANACE 10.00 AP - 00264534 3/12/2008 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 59,060.02 AP - 00264535 3/12/2008 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,329.00 AP - 00264536 3/12/2008 CHILDSPLAY 12,000.00 AP - 00264538 3/12/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00264539 3/12/2008 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP 15,573.66 AP - 00264540 3/12/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 171.50 AP - 00264541 3/] 2/2008 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 86.40 AP - 00264542 3/12/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 258.45 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.83 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.25 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.46 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.87 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 11.90 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.41 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 53.63 P20 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P21 Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.35 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.50 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.36 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,637.57 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.86 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.96 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 841.17 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 371.41 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 232.03 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.97 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.67 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.59 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.98 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.92 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.12 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.17 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 240.91 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.97 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 954.22 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.56 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 193.46 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.62 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.27 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 423.55 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 827.87 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 475.55 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 252.53 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,430.36 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.02 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 996.78 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.60 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.67 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.41 AP-00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 156.22 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,006.09 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.88 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.98 AP - 00264545 3/12/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.98 AP - 00264546 3/12/2008 D 3 EQUIPMENT 45.08 AP - 00264546 3/12/2008 D 3 EQUIPMENT 39.77 AP - 00264547 3/12/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 697.15 AP - 00264547 3/12/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 843.15 AP - 00264547 3/12/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 228.43 AP - 00264547 3/12/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 355.58 AP - 00264547 3/12/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 960.26 AP - 00264548 3/12/2008 D.C. ELECTRONICS TWO INC. 30.36 AP - 00264548 3/12/2008 D.C. ELECTRONICS TWO INC. 40.50 AP - 00264549 3/12/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES ] 8,970.00 AP - 00264549 3/12/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 3,520.00 AP - 00264549 3/12/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 12,000.00 AP - 00264550 3/12/2008 DAMS, AZIZA 20.71 AP - 00264550 3/12/2008 DAVIS, AZIZA 40.40 AP - 00264551 3/12/2008 DELGADO, OSCAR 171.79 AP - 00264552 3/12/2008 DELLHIME, SIGMUND 500.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 Agenda Check Re:rister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264553 3/12/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264554 3/12/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 150.00 AP - 00264555 3/12/2008 DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH 7 20 AP - 00264556 3/12/2008 DIRECTV 29.99 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 91,105.00 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 17,850.00 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 46,770.00 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 61,176.50 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 18,900.00 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 22,830.00 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC 12,996.80 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC -1,299.68 AP - 00264557 3/12/2008 DYNALECTRIC -25,863.15 AP - 00264558 3/12/2008 EDWARDS, DUSTIN 48.00 AP - 00264559 3/12/2008 ELEPHANT SET-STUDIO SCENERY 28,388.57 AP - 00264560 3/12/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,000.00 AP - 00264560 3/12/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 470.00 AP - 00264560 3/12/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 510.00 AP - 00264561 3/12/2008 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 7,916.00 AP - 00264562 3/12/2008 ESRI 18,970.64 AP - 00264563 3/12/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 712.95 AP - 00264564 3/12/2008 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00264566 3/12/2008 FARMER BROTHERS CO 12.74 AP - 00264567 3/12/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.29 AP - 00264567 3/12/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.15 AP - 00264567 3/12/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.02 AP - 00264567 3/12/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 15.58 AP - 00264568 3/12/2008 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 200.00 AP - 00264568 3/12/2008 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 120.00 AP - 00264569 3/12/2008 FIDLER, ZACHARY 348.96 AP - 00264570 3/12/2008 FILARSKY AND WATT 812.50 AP - 00264571 3/12/2008 FINE LINES TRIM 40.00 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 465.00 AP - 00264572 3/12/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 638.40 AP - 00264575 3/12/2008 FIROUZ D.D.S. ORTHODONTIST, MAURICE 168.92 AP - 00264576 3/12/2008 FLEET STAR INC. 2,160.92 AP - 00264577 3/12/2008 FORD PRINTING AND MAILING INC 1,655.11 AP - 00264578 3/12/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 1,338.51 AP - 00264580 3/12/2008 FUKUSHIMA, NDITH 2,244.00 AP - 00264581 3/12/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,134.69 AP - 00264584 3/12/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST -1,631.14 AP - 00264584 3/12/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 1,204.60 AP - 00264584 3/12/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 1,516.81 AP - 00264585 3/12/2008 GRAINGER 1,747.71 AP - 00264585 3/12/2008 GRAINGER 12.59 AP - 00264585 3/12/2008 GRAINGER 88.85 AP - 00264585 3/12/2008 GRAEVGER 627.47 AP - 00264585 3/12/2008 GRAINGER 71.41 AP - 00264586 3/12/2008 GRANICUS INC 1,100.00 AP - 00264587 3/12/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 35.00 AP - 00264587 3/12/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 267.04 AP - 00264588 3/12/2008 GUARDIAN 4,061.73 AP - 00264589 3/12/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO -1.719.69 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA As?enda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264589 3/12/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 537.98 AP - 00264589 3/12/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 4,301.62 AP - 00264590 3/12/2008 HEMINGWAY SHEET METAL INC. 72.90 AP - 00264592 3/12/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC -53.88 AP - 00264592 3/12/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 188.56 AP - 00264593 3/12/2008 HLC ESCROW 714.42 AP - 00264594 3/12/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00264594 3/12/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 647.04 AP - 00264595 3/12/2008 HOSE MAN INC 142.61 AP - 00264596 3/]2/2008 HUANG, PRUDENCE 750.00 AP - 00264597 3/12/2008 HUSE, SANDY 1,000.00 AP - 00264597 3/12/2008 HUSE, SANDY 2,000.00 AP - 00264598 3/12/2008 HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY 747.40 AP - 00264599 3/12/2008 INDUSTRY FREIGHT FORWARDERS 464.52 AP - 00264601 3/12/2008 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 832.00 AP - 00264603 3/12/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 454.00 AP - 00264604 3/12/2008 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY GROUP ]7,454.00 AP - 00264605 3/12/2008 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 68887 AP - 00264606 3/12/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 105.25 AP - 00264606 3/12/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -3.91 AP - 00264606 3/12/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 147.17 AP - 00264607 3/12/2008 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 519.45 AP - 00264608 3/12/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,464.03 AP - 00264609 3/12/2008 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 600.00 AP - 00264609 3/12/2008 JONES AND MAYER; LAW OFFICES OF 3,051.00 AP - 00264610 3/12/2008 JONES, ROBERT 3,360.00 AP - 00264611 3/12/2008 K K WOODWORKING 79.71 AP - 00264612 3/12/2008 KLAUS AND SONS 3,200.00 AP - 00264613 3/12/2008 KOA CORPORATION 10,000.00 AP - 00264616 3/12/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 60.00 AP - 00264616 3/12/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 400.00 AP - 00264618 3/12/2008 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 2,021.41 AP - 00264618 3/12/2008 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 24.70 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 37.83 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.64 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 371.21 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 100.34 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.57 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 76.69 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.87 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 1,013.07 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.76 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.81 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.46 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 107.95 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 232.47 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 191.72 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 98.57 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 69.56 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 58.06 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 39.80 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 79.96 AP - 00264620 3!12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 48.03 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 84.71 P23 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 69.93 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.22 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 764.93 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 33.26 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.93 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 5.32 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 247.30 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 16.68 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.45 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 213.22 AP - 00264620 3/12/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2217 AP - 00264621 3/12/2008 MANSOURI, IRAJ 7,680.00 AP - 00264622 3/12/2008 MARICIC, DIANE 28.28 AP - 00264623 3/12/2008 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES 5,885.83 AP - 00264624 3/12/2008 MAZOR, MARYA 1,333.00 AP - 00264625 3/12/2008 MC TRUCKING 282.65 AP - 00264628 3/12/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY ] 51.96 AP - 00264629 3/12/2008 MEGA WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION INC 146.32 AP - 00264630 3/12/2008 MEGATRUX INC 1,253.56 AP - 00264630 3/12/2008 MEGATRUX INC 2,126.13 AP - 00264631 3/12/2008 METRO FIRE PROTECTION 28.90 AP - 00264632 3/12/2008 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 129.28 AP - 00264635 3/12/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,829.60 AP - 00264636 3/12/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,226.12 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3827 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.69 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 76.19 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 161.15 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 47.39 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 113.88 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 26.17 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 33.45 AP - 00264637 3/12/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 47.37 AP - 00264639 3/12/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 16,812.15 AP - 00264639 3/12/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 835.00 AP - 00264639 3/12/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 1,931.06 AP - 00264640 3/12/2008 NELSON AND SIXTA 1,300.00 AP - 00264641 3/12/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 176.00 AP - 00264643 3/12/2008 NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 40,000.00 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 67.05 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -1.73 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.77 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.53 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.54 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 69.58 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1836 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 49.17 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 184.94 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.36 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ] 25.9] AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12225 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 433.40 AP - 00264644 3/] 2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 281.60 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 137.10 P24 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.95 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 153.47 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 130.38 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 228.48 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,018.33 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.59 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.35 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 46.68 AP - 00264644 3/12/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.93 AP - 00264645 3/12/2008 OLLIVIERRE, KEITH 2,800.00 AP - 00264646 3/12/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 632.28 AP - 00264648 3/12/2008 PARI.IER, CYNTHIA 100.00 AP - 00264649 3/12/2008 PENDLETON PARTNERS INC 17,090.89 AP - 00264650 3/12/2008 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00 AP - 00264651 3/12/2008 PERFORMANCE INSTITUTE, THE 1,590.00 AP - 00264652 3/12/2008 PETE AND SONS CONSTRUCTION 43,750.00 AP - 00264652 3/12/2008 PETE AND SONS CONSTRUCTION -4,375.00 AP - 00264653 3/12/2008 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 333.45 AP - 00264654 3/12/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 3,019.83 AP - 00264654 3/12/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC -36.00 AP - 00264654 3/12/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC -30.00 AP - 00264654 3/12/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 101.43 AP - 00264655 3/12/2008 PIP PRINTING 59.56 AP - 00264656 3/12/2008 PITNEY BOWES 438.88 AP - 00264657 3/12/2008 PITNEY BOWES 25,000.00 AP - 00264658 3/12/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80 AP - 00264659 3/12/2008 RAK-MA, KELSANG 48.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 267.40 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 227.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 150.76 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 39.44 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 143.45 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 661.71 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 46.87 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 227.21 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 155.78 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 149.65 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 179.05 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 177.43 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 116.92 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 123.15 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I ] 56.07 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 178.94 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 84.47 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 399.75 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 158.92 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 140.77 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 82.20 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 52.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 18.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 156.38 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL C 34.42 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 179.05 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 10.49 P25 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 179.05 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 159.81 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 858.94 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 18.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 229.79 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 163.12 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 64.99 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 18.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 241.94 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 464.80 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 159.14 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 344.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 108.07 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 303.16 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 262.82 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 215.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 148.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 131.51 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 108.46 AP - 00264664 3/]2/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 28.12 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 907.04 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 204.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 222.87 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 270.li AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 108.10 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 197.64 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 238.18 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 198.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 200.31 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 192.79 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 206.29 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 155.03 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 220.57 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 8.37 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 91.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 211.94 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 267.24 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 120.50 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 263.15 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 159.]0 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL i 456.33 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 273.41 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 197.07 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 108.14 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 171.04 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 186.06 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 201.43 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 160.30 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 171.04 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL [ 114.37 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL i 216.42 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 16.50 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 257.74 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 108.32 P26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 277.26 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 108.14 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 261.88 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 44.21 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 12.37 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 213.64 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 57.05 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 16.59 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 487.37 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 261.68 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.97 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 181.33 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 142.34 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 188.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 142.34 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 225.62 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 134.22 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 143.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.98 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 142.32 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.97 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 160.70 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 230.92 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 83.43 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 83.37 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 41.91 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 653.28 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 481.56 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 181.05 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 286.78 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 142.34 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 83.54 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 143.32 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 15.40 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 91.24 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 142.35 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 143.39 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 167.57 AP - 00264664 3/]2/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 1,793.13 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 1,449.85 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 418.40 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 83.43 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 130.34 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 209.83 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 121.87 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.98 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 229.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 143.28 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 265.84 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 14.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 170.10 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 114.87 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.04 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 143.28 P27 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check ReEister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 146.41 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL C 162.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 142.35 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 142.33 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 18].10 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 179.63 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 153.00 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 34.79 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 209.86 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 142.33 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 194.83 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 165.64 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 708.94 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 166.99 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 126.91 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 218.22 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 147.81 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 151.58 AP - 00264664 3/12; 2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 147.39 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 141.99 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 127.82 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 68.24 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 127.92 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 182.72 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 137.59 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 47.60 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 361.55 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 581.93 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 364.52 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 237.25 AP - 00264664 3/12/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.75 AP - 00264665 3/12/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 15.62 AP - 00264666 3/12/2008 RCPFA 7,353.02 AP - 00264667 3/12/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 390.06 AP - 00264669 3/12/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,798.00 AP - 00264670 3/12/2008 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS 771.39 AP - 00264671 3/12/2008 RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 60.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 130.00 AP - 00264672 3!12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 120.00 AP - 00264672 3/12/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 125.00 AP - 00264673 3/12/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 176.00 AP - 00264674 3/12/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 213.22 AP - 00264674 3/12/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 309.40 AP - 00264674 3/12/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 330.65 AP - 00264675 3/12/2008 S AND S SALES 32.94 AP - 00264676 3/12/2008 SAEIDI, ARDY 48.00 AP - 00264677 3/12/2008 SAFETY FORUM OF THE INLAND EMPIRE SAFE 10.00 AP - 00264678 3/12/2008 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 2,400.00 AP - 00264679 3/12/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 663.47 AP - 00264680 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 385.50 P28 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264680 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR< 385.50 AP - 00264680 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDIlVO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 514.00 AP - 00264681 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 840.00 AP - 00264683 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1,500.00 AP - 00264683 3/12/2008 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00264684 3/12/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 88.00 AP - 00264685 3/12/2008 SELECT FENCE COMPANY INC 7.20 AP - 00264687 3/12/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 256.66 AP - 00264689 3/12/2008 SO CAL EQUIPMENT 2,808.63 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.73 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.97 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.91 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.60 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.90 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.47 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.80 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 394.41 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.50 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 469.85 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 15.98 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.82 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,808.02 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.63 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.15 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.12 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.13 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.74 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,389.50 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,82882 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.71 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.72 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.14 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.95 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.44 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.15 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.02 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.26 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.58 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2252 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,880.42 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.66 P29 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>ienda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.80 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.48 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.62 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,901.13 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.86 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.22 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,156.77 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.02 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.94 AP - 00264693 3/] 2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.16 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.62 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.33 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.98 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.59 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTFERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.72 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.19 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.78 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.96 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.79 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.75 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.09 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.26 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00264693 3/]2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.25 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.57 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.40 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.09 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.96 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 P30 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check ReEister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.39 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.77 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.88 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.28 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.90 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 926.38 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.51 AP - 00264693 3/12/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.35 AP - 00264694 3/12/2008 SPAGNOLO, S.AM 58.68 AP - 00264694 3/12/2008 SPAGNOLO, SAM 499.22 AP - 00264695 3/]2/2008 STEVES TIRE SERVICE 235.00 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 52.41 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 23.81 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 246.28 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 246.28 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 695.85 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 190.85 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 77.62 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 320.00 AP - 00264697 3/12/2008 SUNRISE FORD 776.75 AP - 00264698 3/12/2008 SUPPRESS FIRE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS INC 81.00 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 442.46 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 137.51 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 453.82 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 117.96 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 310.86 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 73.53 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 116.77 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 174.60 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 281.08 AP - 00264699 3/12/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 609.80 AP - 00264700 3/12/2008 T B R GRADING INC 189.00 AP - 00264701 3/12/2008 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 1,019.30 AP - 00264702 3/12/2008 TBH INC 5.01 AP - 00264704 3/12/2008 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 93.23 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 55.23 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 852.34 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.08 P31 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 830.10 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 6277 AP - 00264705 3/12/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 824.88 AP - 00264706 3/12/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 257.34 AP - 00264706 3/12/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,959.36 AP - 00264707 3/12/2008 UNITED TRAFFIC 948.65 AP - 00264708 3/12/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00 AP - 00264709 3/12/2008 UPLAND AUTO ELECTRIC 167.01 AP - 00264710 3/12/2008 UPS 49.18 AP - 00264710 3/12/2008 UPS 42.16 AP-00264710 3/12/2008 UPS 27.72 AP - 00264710 3/12/2008 UPS 26.88 AP - 00264711 3/12/2008 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC 647.43 AP - 00264712 3/12/2008 VARGAS, WILL 550.00 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 69.24 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 19.11 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 35.83 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 200.18 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 90.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 21.62 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.79 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 279.87 AP - 00264715 3/]2/2008 VERIZON 34.29 AP-00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 48.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.82 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.79 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 33.59 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 33.62 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.88 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VEffiZON 33.49 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 70.06 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.88 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 570.79 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 356.02 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 385.73 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.57 P32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33 Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 33.49 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 100.91 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.82 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 88.82 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 33.80 AP-00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 146.49 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 45.42 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 183.59 AP-002647]5 3/12/2008 VERIZON 32.72 AP - 00264715 3/12/2008 VERIZON 1,408.61 AP - 00264716 3/12/2008 VIRGINIA DARE WINERY CENTER 100.00 AP - 00264717 3/12/2008 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 240.43 AP - 00264718 3/12/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 215.72 AP - 00264719 3/12/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 722.50 AP - 00264720 3/12/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 1,251.84 AP - 00264720 3/12/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 1,666.86 AP - 00264721 3/12/2008 WATER CITY 75.99 AP - 00264722 3/12/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 344.29 AP - 00264723 3/12/2008 WE TIP INC 400.00 AP - 00264724 3/12/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 991.36 AP - 00264724 3/12/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 216.50 AP - 00264724 3/12/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 17.78 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 45.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00264725 3/12/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00264726 3/12/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 31.83 AP - 00264726 3/12/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 1,252.73 AP - 00264727 3/12/2008 WHITTEMORE ENTERPRISES INC 40.50 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 596.16 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 333.26 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 372.05 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 498.26 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 560.71 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 379.45 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL 642.15 AP - 00264728 3/12/2008 WILSON AND BELL ],065.22 AP - 00264729 3/12/2008 WLC ARCHITECTS 1,530.00 AP - 00264730 3/12/2008 YEE, LARRY 47.00 AP - 00264731 3/12/2008 YES YOU CAN BUY 12.00 AP - 00264732 3/12/2008 YORK INDUSTRIES 196.25 AP - 00264733 3/12/2008 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 750.00 AP - 00264734 3/12/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 760.96 AP - 00264736 3/17/2008 FREEMAN, LARRY S. 1,654.91 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264737 3/19/2008 A & M ORNAMENTAL IRON 40.50 AP - 00264738 3/19/2008 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 1,490.40 AP - 00264739 3/19/2008 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 1,393.00 AP - 00264740 3/19/2008 ACCELA INC 555.00 AP - 00264740 3/19/2008 ACCELA INC 555.00 AP - 00264741 3/19/2008 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 175.00 AP - 00264742 3/19/2008 AGI ACADEMY 315.00 AP - 00264744 3/19/2008 ALLEN, TONY 280.50 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOM.4 ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 105.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 440.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/ 19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00264746 3/19/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 210.00 AP - 00264747 3/19/2008 AMBIANCE ADDITIONS 395.54 AP - 00264748 3/19/2008 AMERON PIPE DIVISION 48.00 AP - 00264749 3/19/2008 APPLE INC 112.49 AP - 00264751 3/19/2008 APPLE VALLEY, TOWN OF 298.00 AP - 00264752 3/19/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 13,562.50 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 136.50 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 2.43 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 508.20 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,550.00 AP - 00264753 3/19/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 9.22 AP - 00264754 3/19/2008 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 693.87 AP - 00264755 3/19/2008 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC 24,549.00 AP - 00264756 3/19/2008 ASSOCIATED GROUP 2,207.59 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264757 3/19/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 3,577.50 AP - 00264758 3/19/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 11,192.50 AP - 00264759 3/19/2008 AT&T 1,129.56 AP - 00264759 3/19/2008 AT&T 3,090.91 AP - 00264759 3/19/2008 AT&T 15.39 AP - 00264760 3/19/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 4,292.50 AP - 00264760 3/19/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,380.00 AP - 00264761 3/19/2008 AVID MICROSHIP ID SYSTEM 321.10 AP - 00264762 3/19/2008 AZIZI, LAW OFFICES OF SOHEILA S 5.45 AP - 00264763 3/19/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9,372.45 AP - 00264764 3/19/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 195.03 AP - 00264764 3/19/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 390.82 AP - 00264765 3/19/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 13,395.50 AP - 00264766 3/19/2008 BART UDINK CONSTRUCTION 79.20 AP - 00264767 3/19/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 5,715.00 AP - 00264767 3/19/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 4,637.50 AP - 00264768 3/19/2008 BENAVIDEZ, MARGARITA 46.50 AP - 00264769 3/19/2008 BLANCHARD, ALLISON 90.00 AP - 00264770 3/19/2008 BRETALL, CURT 250.00 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 385.43 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 283.11 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 114.92 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 89.37 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 119.28 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.18 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 87.35 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 288.13 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 869.01 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 18.75 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 307.78 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 435.18 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 330.58 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.63 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 9.95 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 896.67 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 454.27 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.83 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2128 AP - 00264771 3/19/2008 BRODART BOOKS 63.84 AP - 00264772 3/19/2008 BROWN, JENNIFER 132.00 AP - 00264773 3/19/2008 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 105.00 AP - 00264774 3/] 9/2008 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 644.13 AP - 00264775 3/19/2008 CACEO 150.00 AP - 00264777 3/19/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 372.03 AP - 00264778 3/19/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00264779 3/19/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 47.58 AP - 00264780 3/19/2008 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 36.44 AP - 00264781 3/19/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 14.85 AP - 00264782 3/19/2008 CANTEEN VENDING SERVICES 44.83 P35 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porhait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264783 3/19/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 203.03 AP - 00264783 3/19/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 432.40 AP - 00264783 3/19/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 517.96 AP - 00264783 3/19/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 182.15 AP - 00264784 3/19/2008 CARRILLO, TRINA 384.00 AP - 00264785 3/19/2008 CARTY, DIANE 1,562.40 AP - 00264786 3/19/2008 CASH, PAUL 724.80 AP - 00264787 3/19/2008 CASK N CLEAVER 63.00 AP - 00264788 3/19/2008 CASTILLO, FRANK 135.00 AP - 00264789 3/19/2008 CASTILLO, JACK 1,504.50 AP - 00264790 3/19/2008 CENTER ICE ARENA 227.50 AP - 00264791 3/19/2008 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 62.65 AP - 00264792 3/19/2008 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 10.99 AP - 00264793 3/19/2008 CISNEROS, JENNY 65.00 AP - 00264794 3/19/2008 CITY WIDE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 113.00 AP - 00264795 3/19/2008 CLARK, KAREN 2,292.00 AP - 00264798 3/19/2008 COASTAL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 30.00 AP - 00264799 3/19/2008 COLLINS EQUINE VETERINARY SERVICES 1,170.00 AP - 00264799 3/19/2008 COLLINS EQUINE VETERINARY SERVICES 195.00 AP - 00264799 3/19/2008 COLLINS EQUINE VETERINARY SERVICES 1,025.00 AP - 00264800 3/19/2008 COLOR ME MINE 91.00 AP - 00264801 3/19/2008 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 2,348.10 AP - 00264802 3/19/2008 COMPUTEK 2,220.18 AP - 00264803 3/19/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPt 192.55 AP - 00264804 3/19/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 117.60 AP - 00264804 3/19/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 7.00 AP - 00264807 3/19/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP - 00264807 3/19/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00264807 3/19/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00264808 3/19/2008 COX, HEIDI 100.00 AP - 00264809 3/19/2008 CRIDLAND, KYLE 28.28 AP - 00264810 3/19/2008 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 00264811 3/19/2008 CUB SCOUT PACK 536 250.00 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.28 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.14 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 540.59 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 500.69 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.81 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.32 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.50 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 316.72 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.70 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,160.48 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 265.98 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.73 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.36 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.34 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148.24 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.31 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.33 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.45 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.98 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.51 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 9.74 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.99 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.31 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.30 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.92 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 864.93 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.52 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.64 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.95 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.26 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.43 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.41 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.84 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.83 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.48 AP-00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 238.25 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 375.67 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.96 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 734.79 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 252.88 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 673.16 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 989.09 AP - 002648]4 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 537.93 AP-00264814 3/]9/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 31.45 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270.17 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 288.79 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.93 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40 AP - 002648]4 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.23 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.34 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 337.10 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.81 AP - 00264814 3/]9/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.95 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.26 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.98 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.49 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41.66 AP -00264814 3/]9/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.79 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.08 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.57 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 297.20 AP-002648]4 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 261.29 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 641.67 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 460.81 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 386.33 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 733.83 AP-00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.32 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 845.18 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 621.74 P37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 649.67 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.98 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 740.11 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,173.42 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 246.66 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 247.56 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,221.57 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 306.51 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 537.50 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.23 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 261.11 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 670.68 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.97 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 543.25 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.65 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.15 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 783.98 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 377.00 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 302.52 AP-002648]4 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 403.60 AP - 00264814 3/19/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.77 AP - 00264815 3/19/2008 D & D DISPOSAL INC. 400.00 AP - 00264816 3/19/2008 D.C. ELECTRONICS TWO INC. 30.36 AP - 00264817 3/19/2008 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 1,134.30 AP - 00264818 3/19/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 264.99 AP - 00264819 3/19/2008 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,917.60 AP - 00264820 3/ 19/2008 DARCY, KATHLEEN M. 90.00 AP - 00264821 3/19/2008 DAMS, LENA 136.50 AP - 00264822 3/19/2008 DCM CONSTRUCTION INC. 40.50 AP - 00264823 3/19/2008 DELTA DENTAL 40,764.50 AP - 00264824 3/19/2008 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133.20 AP - 00264825 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,376.00 AP - 00264825 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,790.00 AP - 00264826 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264827 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264828 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264829 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264830 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264831 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00264832 3/19/2008 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,581.65 AP - 00264833 3/19/2008 DIAZ, ADRIAN 15.00 AP - 00264834 3/19/2008 DMJM HARRIS 1,557.38 AP - 00264836 3/19/2008 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 1,032.00 AP - 00264837 3/19/2008 DUFFY, RICK 3,870.30 AP - 00264838 3/19/2008 DUNN, ANN MARIE 1,705.80 AP - 00264839 3/19/2008 E.D.D. RIVERSIDE AREA COLLECTION OFFICE 36.99 AP - 00264840 3/19/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 129.79 AP - 00264840 3/19/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 20.00 AP - 00264841 3/19/2008 EDWARDS, DUSTIN 48.00 AP - 00264843 3/19/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 22,900.00 AP - 00264844 3/19/2008 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,650.00 AP - 00264846 3/19/2008 ESGIL CORPORATION 18,845.62 AP - 00264847 3/19/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 48.49 AP - 00264848 3/19/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.89 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 Aeenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264848 3/19/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 22.14 AP - 00264848 3/19/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 36.60 AP - 00264848 3/19/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.79 AP - 00264849 3/19/2008 FELICIANQ ANTHONY 90.00 AP - 00264850 3/19/2008 FIBRE CONTAINERS COMPANY 122.91 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 851.20 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 15.96 AP - 00264851 3/19/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 851.20 AP - 00264854 3/19/2008 FOREMAN, FELECIA 2.00 AP - 00264855 3/19/2008 FOUNDATION CRY-ROP 250.00 AP - 00264857 3/19/2008 FREEDOM ORANGE COUNTY INFORMATION 1,179.95 AP - 00264858 3/19/2008 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 2,320.00 AP - 00264860 3/19/2008 GAMEZ, MARK 425.00 AP - 00264861 3/19/2008 GEIGER BROTHERS WEST 257.03 AP - 00264862 3/19/2008 GENESIS FILTRATION INC. 80.00 AP - 00264863 3/19/2008 GENTEX CORP. WESTERN OPERATIONS 60.74 AP - 00264864 3/19/2008 GENUNG, NATE 90.00 AP - 00264865 3/19/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 2,274.55 AP - 00264865 3/19/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 59.26 AP - 00264865 3/19/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 2,741.16 AP - 00264865 3/19/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 87.50 AP - 00264866 3/19/2008 GEORGE TAO D.D.S. INC. 99.89 AP - 00264867 3/19/2008 GILKEY, JOHN 100.00 AP - 00264868 3/19/2008 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 807.00 AP - 00264869 3/19/2008 GRAHAM AGENCY 500.00 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 38.17 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 141.80 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 109.68 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 557.54 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 80.00 AP - 00264870 3/19/2008 GRAINGER 318.25 AP - 00264871 3/19/2008 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 362,662.40 AP - 00264871 3/19/2008 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC -36,266.24 AP - 00264872 3/19/2008 HADDON, DAWN 54.04 AP - 00264872 3/19/2008 HADDON, DAWN 8.16 AP - 00264872 3/19/2008 HADDON, DAWN 30.00 AP - 00264873 3/19/2008 HANGER I S LLC. 182.00 AP - 00264874 3/19/2008 HASAN, JAMES 1,070.00 AP - 00264875 3/19/2008 HEILIG, KELLY 1,360.80 AP - 00264876 3/19/2008 HERNANDEZ, PIA 100.00 AP - 00264877 3/]9/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 242.44 AP - 00264877 3/19/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 23.85 AP - 00264877 3/19/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 188.56 AP - 00264877 3/19/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 188.56 AP - 00264878 3/19/2008 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 1,200.00 AP - 00264878 3/19/2008 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 11,444.62 AP - 00264879 3/19/2008 HIRSCH AND ASSOCIATES 280.00 AP - 00264880 3/19/2008 HOGLE-IRELAND 6,500.64 AP - 00264881 3/19/2008 HOLLINSHEAD, KATE 90.00 AP - 00264882 3/19/2008 HOME DEPOT USA INC. 25.00 AP - 00264883 3/19/2008 HOWARD, BOBBY 1,008.00 AP - 00264885 3/19/2008 HSU, STEVE 499.20 AP - 00264886 3/19/2008 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 630.00 AP - 00264887 3/19/2008 HUTCHINSON, LISA 1,305.60 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P40 Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00264888 3/19/2008 IMPERIAL WOODWORK INC 35.00 AP - 00264889 3/19/2008 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 405.31 AP - 00264889 3/19/2008 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 1,001.87 AP - 00264889 3/19/2008 IIvIPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 830.97 AP - 00264890 3/19/2008 INFINITEK CORPORATION 127.79 AP - 00264891 3/19/2008 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 6,227.00 AP - 00264893 3/19/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 73.32 AP - 00264893 3/19/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 100.80 AP - 00264894 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 3,400.28 AP - 00264895 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 477.00 AP - 00264895 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 179.00 AP - 00264895 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 228.50 AP - 00264895 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 267.50 AP - 00264895 3/19/2008 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 AP - 00264896 3/19/2008 INTERSTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 5,400.00 AP - 00264896 3/19/2008 INTERSTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 640.00 AP - 00264896 3/19/2008 INTERSTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 400.00 AP - 00264897 3/19/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 527.75 AP - 00264898 3/19/2008 JACKSON, HUGH 25.00 AP - 00264899 3/19/2008 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 1,046.50 AP - 00264900 3/19/2008 KAELBERER, BETH 500.00 AP - 00264901 3/19/2008 KIM, DANIEL 441.00 AP - 00264902 3/19/2008 KINKLE RODIGER AND SPRIGGS 1,182.74 AP - 00264902 3/19/2008 KINKLE RODIGER AND SPRIGGS 1,544.81 AP - 00264904 3/19/2008 KOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ] 8.90 AP - 00264905 3/19/2008 KOTZIN AND ASSOCIATES INC, R 11,904.20 AP - 00264906 3/19/2008 L E H AND ASSOCIATES 13,500.00 AP - 00264907 3/19/2008 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00264908 3/19/2008 LESTER, RANDY 45.00 AP-002649]0 3/19/2008 LIM,HEATHER 990.00 AP - 00264911 3/19/2008 LIN, TUANG LI CHIEN 119.08 AP - 00264912 3/19/2008 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 59.40 AP - 00264912 3/19/2008 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE -14.85 AP - 00264914 3/19/2008 LORENZO, MILDRED 657.00 AP-002649]5 3/19/2008 LOUIS, PETER 579.00 AP - 00264916 3/19/2008 MAGRUDER, KAREN 70.20 AP - 00264917 3/]9/2008 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 1,950.28 AP - 00264918 3/19/2008 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,168.20 AP-002649]9 3/19/2008 MARSHALL, VIRGINIA 48.00 AP - 00264920 3/19/2008 MATERL4L HANDLING SOLUTIONS 110.01 AP - 00264921 3/19/2008 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 67.50 AP - 00264922 3/19/2008 MCCAINE, SHAWNTA 15.00 AP - 00264923 3/19/2008 MCCALEB, ERIN 858.00 AP - 00264924 3/19/2008 MCI 364.48 AP - 00264925 3/19/2008 MCINTOSH AICP, ANNE BROWNING 375.00 AP - 00264928 3/19/2008 MEGAZONE INC 379.00 AP - 00264929 3/19/2008 MERIAL LIMITED 562.46 AP - 00264930 3/19/2008 MILLS, CAREY 619.20 AP - 00264931 3/19/2008 MIRANDA, ELENA 106.25 AP - 00264932 3/19/2008 MOE, JOHN 847.50 AP - 00264933 3/19/2008 MORRIS, RICHARD 540.00 AP - 00264934 3/19/2008 MYERCHIN, NICOLE 1,834.80 AP - 00264935 3/19/2008 NADEL INC 30.]0 AP - 00264937 3/19/2008 NEW TECH SOLUTIONS INC 15,283.26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264938 3/19/2008 NEWMAN, ROBERT 100.00 AP - 00264939 3/19/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 60.00 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.07 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 18.36 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 2,112.46 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 68.76 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 121.65 AP - 00264942 3/ 19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.18 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 56.40 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.14 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.54 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 40.49 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 967.60 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.58 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 18.89 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -7.91 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.87 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 38.19 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 264.98 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.25 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 87.45 AP - 00264942 3/] 9/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 340.38 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 156.73 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 18.12 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 5.78 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -18.12 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -48.44 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -6.20 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.21 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,000.00 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 2,537.65 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 124.65 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 111.95 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 338.57 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 10.80 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 147.78 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 314.57 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 40.63 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.28 AP - 00264942 3/19/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 637.73 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT 1NC 343.73 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 77.47 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 700.27 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 1,391.92 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 401.15 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 401.15 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 1,511.52 AP - 00264943 3/19/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC -343.73 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM 499.38 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM 286.88 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM -276.25 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM 765.00 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM 1,020.00 AP - 00264944 3/19/2008 OFFICE TEAM 765.00 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264945 3/19/2008 OMNITRANS 191.00 AP - 00264946 3/19/2008 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 840.00 AP - 00264947 3/19/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 17,908.35 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -174.54 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 30.42 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 58.00 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 42.83 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 246.53 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 19.57 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 113.12 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 3.00 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 61.73 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 384.66 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 165.44 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15.23 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 3.43 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 33.39 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9.35 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 108.80 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 248.55 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 95.35 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 158.00 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 129.94 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 246.69 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.39 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 250.94 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 32.94 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 147.50 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 129.08 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.62 AP - 00264948 3/19/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 40.92 AP - 00264949 3/19/2008 ORONA, PATRICIA 450.00 AP - 00264950 3/19/2008 DRR, PAUL 24.00 AP - 00264951 3/19/2008 OTSUKA, DENNIS 36.00 AP - 00264952 3/19/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 37.69 AP - 00264953 3/19/2008 PACIFIC MEDICAL SPECIALTIES LLC 12.00 AP - 00264954 3/19/2008 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00 AP - 00264955 3/19/2008 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00264957 3/19/2008 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00 AP - 00264958 3/19/2008 PEREZ, JOHN 13.00 AP - 00264959 3/19/2008 PMI 1,028.00 AP - 00264961 3/19/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 266.49 AP - 00264962 3/19/2008 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,041.95 AP - 00264962 3/19/2008 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 92.40 AP - 00264965 3/19/2008 QUINTANA, PAUL 61.61 AP-00264966 3/19/2008 QWEST 7.43 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 118.86 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 235.80 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 197.25 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 300.80 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 326.54 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 313.13 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 201.87 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 168.87 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P43 Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 507.61 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.00 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 244.70 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 130.73 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 398.51 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 59.16 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 60.25 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 401.85 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.04 AP - 00264967 3/19/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 164.64 AP - 00264968 3/19/2008 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 3,030.84 AP - 00264969 3/19/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 63.58 AP - 00264969 3/19/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 152.98 AP - 00264969 3/19/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 250.00 AP - 00264970 3/19/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 229.29 AP - 00264970 3/19/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 310.00 AP - 00264971 3/19/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 183.16 AP - 00264972 3/19/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 81.06 AP - 00264972 3/19/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 201.38 AP - 00264973 3/19/2008 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 904.45 AP - 00264973 3/19/2008 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 904.45 AP - 00264973 3/19/2008 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS -602.97 AP - 00264974 3/19/2008 RIDGELIKE ROOFING 1,100.00 AP - 00264975 3/19/2008 RIVERA, ENOC 680.60 AP - 00264976 3/19/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 36,697.57 AP - 00264976 3/19/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 12,747.96 AP - 00264976 3/19/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 42,927.82 AP - 00264977 3!19/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 916.98 AP - 00264977 3/19/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 887.40 AP - 00264977 3/19/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,183.20 AP - 00264977 3/19/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 887.40 AP - 00264978 3/19/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 88.00 AP - 00264979 3/19/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 266.90 AP - 00264979 3/19/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP - 00264980 3/19/2008 RUBINO, JENNIFER 27.72 AP - 00264981 3/19/2008 RUBIO, RONDA 425.00 AP - 00264982 3/19/2008 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 161.70 AP - 00264983 3/19/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 133.02 AP - 00264984 3/19/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY ASSESSOR 840.00 AP - 00264985 3/19/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORT 36,285.00 AP - 00264986 3/19/2008 SANBAG/SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOV 9,275.07 AP - 00264987 3/19/2008 SANDOVAL, RIGO 10.00 AP - 00264988 3/19/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 128.00 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 3,816.07 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 10,137.84 AP - 00264989 3/19/2008 SC FUELS 13,999.86 AP - 00264990 3/19/2008 SCHONDEL, TONY 226.88 AP - 00264991 3/19/2008 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00 AP - 00264992 3/19/2008 SHARPE, JOHANNA 100.00 AP - 00264993 3/19/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250.00 AP - 00264994 3/19/2008 SHRED IT 21.25 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 A>?enda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00264994 3/19/2008 SHRED IT 21.25 AP - 00264994 3/19/2008 SHRED IT 42.50 AP - 00264995 3/19/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 832.37 AP - 00264996 3/19/2008 SMOKE DETECTORS, THE 1,120.00 AP - 00264997 3/19/2008 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,400.00 AP - 00264997 3/19/2008 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 700.00 AP - 00264998 3/19/2008 SOLOMON, LASHONDA 324.00 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.98 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.99 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.84 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.20 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1 ]4.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.97 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.85 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.67 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.72 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.30 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.81 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 879.58 AP - 00265003 3/]9/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.00 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.09 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.57 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.32 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.90 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.30 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 63.90 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.18 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.14 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.66 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 617.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.37 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.11 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.43 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.04 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.78 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.41 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.89 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.64 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lope2 Page: 28 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/2S/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,211.91 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,110.31 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.91 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,102.58 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.23 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.86 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON IS.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.26 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 210.61 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.84 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 209.78 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.20 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1934 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.48 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.13 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.63 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.91 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.65 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.59 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 8.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.84 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 605.13 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 620.46 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 532.54 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 307.01 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.04 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.41 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 237.70 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.13 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.96 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.97 AP - 00265003 3/] 9/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 5.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.56 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.74 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.44 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.72 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.46 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.10 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 P45 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Date: 03/26/200 ReporhCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Ageuda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check ReEister 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.72 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.85 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.26 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.02 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.86 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.65 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.97 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.97 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.71 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.61 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.01 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.69 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.47 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 5.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.61 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.65 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.01 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.21 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.44 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29 AP - 00265003 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64,]32.62 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 886.47 P46 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 03/26/200 Repor[:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check Re>?ister 3/12/2008 through 3/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,340.27 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,984.81 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,973.73 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.79 AP - 00265004 3/19/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21,684.94 AP - 00268008 3/19/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 1,196.00 AP - 00265006 3/19/2008 STERICYCLE INC 445.91 AP - 00265007 3/19/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 128.68 AP - 00265007 3/19/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 331.83 AP - 00265007 3/19/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE SS3.78 AP - 00265007 3/19/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 264.61 AP - 00265008 3/19/2008 STERLING ELECTRIC 68.40 AP - 00265009 3/19/2008 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 75.00 AP - 00265010 3/19/2008 STOFA, JOSEPH 13.00 AP - 0026501 I 3/19/2008 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,239.13 AP - 00265012 3/] 9/2008 SUN BADGE CO 76.23 AP - 00265013 3/19/2008 SUN, THE 172.80 AP - 00265014 3/19/2008 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ENTERPRISE INC 1,024.50 AP - 00265015 3/19/2008 SWEDA, SHANNON 312.00 AP - 00265016 3/19/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 677.65 AP - 00265018 3/19/2008 TERRY, DONNA 226.80 AP - 00265019 3/19/2008 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICE 387.90 AP - 00265020 3/19/2008 THOMAS, TRACY 90.00 AP - 00265021 3/19/2008 TIME WARNER TELECOM S3S.20 AP - 00265021 3/19/2008 TIME WARNER TELECOM 685.60 AP - 00265021 3/19/2008 TIME WARNER TELECOM 993.60 AP - 00265022 3/19/2008 TOMARK SPORTS INC 263.66 AP - 00265022 3/19/2008 TOMARK SPORTS INC 63.57 AP - 00265023 3/19/2008 TONG, TUNG 25.00 AP - 00265026 3/19/2008 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,961.78 AP - 00265026 3/19/2008 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 6,619.17 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,622.00 AP - 00265027 3/] 9/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,000.00 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,512.00 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 8,897.61 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,581.03 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 292.06 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 533.19 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,516.89 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,721.57 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,014.07 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,634.02 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,162.00 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 57.34 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,521.30 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,145.90 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 27,186.78 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,695.61 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 869.56 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 956.32 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,328.92 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,077.78 AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 475.00 P47 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/12/2008 through 3/25/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00265027 3/19/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 7,967.44 AP - 00265029 3/19/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 48,944.67 AP - 00265030 3/19/2008 UNITED EDUCATION INSTITUTE 2,423.00 AP - 00265031 3/19/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 132.71 AP - 00265032 3/19/2008 UNITED WAY 304.82 AP - 00265033 3/19/2008 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 10,281.70 AP - 00265034 3/19/2008 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,154.40 AP - 00265035 3/19/2008 UPS 68.00 AP - 00265036 3/19/2008 URBANO, VERNIE 560.00 AP - 00265037 3/19/2008 VALDEZ, ED 150.00 AP - 00265038 3/19/2008 VALDEZ, RACHELLE 145.80 AP - 00265039 3/19/2008 VENTURI STAFFING PARTNERS 50.00 AP - 00265040 3/19/2008 VENUES TODAY INC 200.00 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.00 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 22.59 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.56 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 19.80 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 69.86 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 19.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 19.53 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 375.33 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 35.02 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 35.09 AP-00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 21.62 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 117.79 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.00 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 35.38 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 128.10 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 40.70 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 219.66 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP-00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 33.01 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 35.43 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 33.49 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 66.99 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.41 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 21.07 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 88.57 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.00 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 36.68 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 151J5 AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON 34.56 P48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 03/26/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:12:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 3/12/2008 through 3/2S/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265042 3/19/2008 VERIZON AP - 00265043 3/19/2008 Verizon AP - 00265044 3/19/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY AP - 00265045 3/19/2008 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL AP - 00265046 3/19/2008 VOSS, MARY AP - 00265046 3/19/2008 VOSS, MARY AP - 00265046 3/19/2008 VOSS, MARY AP - 00265046 3/19/2008 VOSS, MARY AP - 00265046 3/19/2008 VOSS, MARY AP - 00265047 3/19/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00265047 3/19/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00265048 3/19/2008 WAREHOUSE FURNITURE OUTLET AP - 00265049 3/19/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 0026SOS0 3/19/2008 WHITE, BETTY AP - 0026SOS 1 3/19/2008 WILSON, JOHN C AP - 0026SOS2 3/19/2008 WITHERS & SANDGREN LTD AP - 0026SOS3 3/19/2008 WLC ARCHITECTS AP - 0026SOSS 3/19/2008 YALE CHASE MATERIALS HANDLING INC AP - 00265056 3/19/2008 YEE, LARRY AP - 0026SOS7 3/19/2008 ZAILO, ROBERT AP - 00265058 3/20/2008 GUSHUE, GARY AP - 0026SOS9 3/20/2008 LIN, TUANG LI CHIEN AP - 00265060 3/20/2008 ZAILO, ROBERT Amount 34.99 21.07 88.57 172.42 33.49 38.19 44.14 44.14 88.57 67.02 134.02 lOS.31 31.46 2,367.21 950.00 S 1.OS 17.50 8.45 178.75 94.18 720.07 184.73 51.19 376.96 1,314.00 440.00 2,750.00 S4S.00 110.00 31.00 410.00 500.00 119.08 410.40 Total (or Check H) AP: 2.531,810.91 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Total for Entit}': 2,531,810.91 P49 Current Date: 03/26/200 Time: 1 S:12:3 P50 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTb1ENT RANCHO Date: April 2, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer~~ Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO ARROW ROUTE AND ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 2500' WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1 1 2430356 50/1 0761 24-0, PROP. 42 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1 1 9030356 50/1 0761 90-0, AND MEASURE "I" FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1372176-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4'" Street to Arrow Route and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 2500' West of Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, routing of cracks, removal and replacement of damaged pavement, asphalt rubberized hot mix overlay, adjust utilities to grade, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Transportation funds, Account No. 11243035650/1076124-0, Prop. 42 funds, Account No. 1 1 903035650/1 076 1 90- 0 and Measure "I" funds, Account No. 1 1 7630356 50/1 3721 76-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for the Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation is $1,100,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 8, 2008 and April 15, 2008, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 22, 2008. Resp bmitted, Mahdi luzri Deputy ity Manager/Community Development MA:RMD Attachments P5 ,NDA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATIO (FROM FOURTH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE) AND ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (FROM 2500' W/0 ETIWANDA AVE. TO ETIWANDA AVE.) ALMOND SITS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP P52 RESOLUTION NO. l70 ~ 0'70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO ARROW ROUTE AND ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 2500' WEST OF ETIWANDAAVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE" IN SAID CITYAND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. W HEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby ap~roved as the plans and specifications forthe "Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4` Street to Arrow Route and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 2500' West of Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 22, 2008, sealed bids or proposals for the "Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4~h Street to Arrow Route and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 2500' West of Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the offce of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4`h Street to Arrow Route and Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 2500' West of Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations P53 RESOLUTION NO. April 2, 2008 Page 2 of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of perdiem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in thattrade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen thatwill be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administratorof Apprenticeship, San P54 RESOLUTION NO. April 2, 2008 Page 3 Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall P55 RESOLUTION NO. April 2, 2008 Page 4 indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, asset forth in the Plans and Specifcations regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 2nd day of April, 2008 Publish Dates: April 8 and April 15, 2008 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 2"d day of April, 2008. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk P56 RESOLUTION NO. April 2, 2008 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd day of April, 2008. Executed this 2nd day of April, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 8, 2008 and April 15, 2008 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer P57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO ARROW ROUTE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Project Development Cooperative Agreement between the City and the County of San Bernardino and authorize the Mayor to sign the Cooperative Agreement for the Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4`" Street to Arrow Route. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, routing of cracks, removal and replacement of damaged pavement, asphalt rubberized hot mix overlay, adjust utilities to grade, re-striping and pavement markings, from 4`h Street to Arrow Route. However, the easterly half of the street between 4`" Street and Napa Street is within the County of San Bernardino, thus resulting in the need for the Cooperative Agreement. The project is on the agenda tonight for approval to advertise for bid and to be funded from Transportation funds, Prop. 42 funds, and Measure I funds. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation is $930,000, with the County's share estimated at $ 250,000. submitted, i Aluzri y City Manager/Community Development MA:RMD Attachment PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (FROM FOURTH STREET TO ARROW HILLSI E D IL ~ ILSO AVE -~~ Y4TH ST N w ~ ~ BAN N ST ¢ ~ SU IT AV a EMO ~~ V U a ~ N^~, 9 H 0 x~ HIGH ND E 3 ~ / 30 a m N ~~ J VICTORI PARK v B LINE D I`14 _ ~~ HUR ST I^^II\\ VI TA 0] a~1~ w ~ ~^^U U FOOTHILL BLVD ~ 66 w 10500 C CENiE DR. w w ~ RROW w ~~ ~ I ~ ~ • ~ w Z ~ N W ~ ,,,.,, ¢ ~ a o a ¢ BNSF ~ ST 6TH ST COOPERATNE PROJECT SITE-BETWEEN CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EC SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP x P59 the city of Rancho Cucamonga Staff Report DATE: April 2, 2008 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RBF CONSULTING, NOT TO EXCEED $185,830, FOR THE PREPARATION OF A AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (DRC2008-00263) FOR THE BIANE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT, WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO BE FUNDED FROM THE DEVELOPER DEPOSIT THROUGH ACCOUNT 10013145303. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement awarding the contract to RBF Consulting. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received an application to demolish an existing winery facility to develop a 239,370 square foot industrial warehouse building on a 10.41-acre parcel referred to herein as "Biane Business Park," located at 10013 East 8th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. The existing winery facility, Biane Winery, consists of approximately 13 industrial buildings including; a winery building, bottling plant and warehouse, grape crushing building, distillery, bonded warehouse, and three single-family homes that range from 900 to1,200 square feet in size. Additionally, there is approximately 1.14 acre of active grape vineyards on the subject site. The Biane Winery was originally established circa 1910 as the Cucamonga Vintage Co. and has been identified in previous cultural reports as appearing to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The current project site is designated as General Industrial (GI), Subarea 5, on the Land Use Map and General Industrial on the City's General Plan. No Development DistrictAmendment orGeneral Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. On January 17, 2008, LSA Associates, Inc. was selected to prepare the Cultural Resources Assessment of the Biane Winery and update the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Forms (DPR 523A and 5236) for the property as part of the Cultural Assessment. Additionally, on January 17, 2008 staff released the Request for Proposal (RFP) to several environmental consulting firms in Southern California, to prepare an Initial Study for the Biane P60 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -RBF April 2, 2008 Page 2 Business Park and determine the appropriate CEQA document required for the project. If it is determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR/Focused EIR is required based on the Initial Study, the selected consultant will process the appropriate document for the proposed project. The City requested that interested candidates submit atwo-part proposal for the Initial Study and for the Mitigated Negative Declaration/EIR if required. Two consulting firms responded to the RFP and based on a review of the proposals submitted for the Scope of Services/Work with cost estimates, RBF Consulting has been selected for City Council consideration. The contract is for $185,830. The developer submitted to the City a deposit of $185,830 to cover the costs associated with the successful bidder's proposal for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or Environmental Impact Report preparation and processing. Re pectfully submitt d, James R. Troyer Planning Director JT/CB/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Request For Proposal/Qualifications (RFP/RFQ) Exhibit B - RBF Consulting Proposal Dated February 19, 2008 P61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DATE: January 17, 2008 GOAL: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals to prepare an Initial Study and determine the appropriate CEQA required document for the Biane Business Park Project. The update must include specific public participation opportunities, meet all legal requirements, and be user friendly with the most current computer access processes and methods available. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City has received an application to demolish an existing winery facility to develop a 239,370 square foot industrial warehouse building on a 10.41-acre parcel referred to herein as "Biane Business Park" located at 10013 East 8th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. The existing winery facility, Biane Winery, consists of nine existing structures including; a 75,000 square foot main building, 16,000 square foot warehouse building, two storage facilities (1,000 square feet and 1,500 square feet); and three single-family homes that range from 900 to1,200 square feet in size. Additionally, there is approximately 1.14 acre of active grape vineyards on the subject site. The Biane Winery was originally established circa 1910 as the Cucamonga Vintage Co. and has been identified in previous cultural reports as appearing to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The City is requesting proposals to prepare an Initial Study for the Biane Business Park and determine the appropriate CEQA document required for the project. A California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) form prepared in 2001 for the site is attached for your review. LSA Associates, Inc. is currently preparing the Cultural Resources Assessment of the Biane Winery and is anticipating that the study will be completed by early March. LSA Associates, Inc. will update the DPR 523A and 5238 forms for the property as part of the Cultural Assessment. If it is determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR/Focused EIR is required based on the Initial Study, the selected consultant will process the appropriate document for the proposed project. The City is requesting that interested candidates submit atwo-part proposal for the Initial Study and for the Mitigated Negative Declaration/EIR if required. The current project site is designated as General Industrial (GI), Subarea 5, on the Land Use Map and General Industrial on the City's General Plan. No Development District Amendment or General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. If it is determined that an EIR is required, the document shall be in conformance with State and City requirements and include the following basic components: • Initial Study and Notice of Preparation • Screen Check EIR • Draft EIR • Response to Comments • Final EIR • Mitigation Monitoring Program ~xh~'.6, ~ ./~ P62 BIANE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DRC2007-00951 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL January 17, 2007 Page 2 • EIR Certification Process • Public Hearings - Up to a total of four public hearings, two before the Planning Commission and two before the City Council. • Findings for EIR Certification, including over-riding if needed. • Final EIR • Program Administration • Meetings, Graphics, and Time Table • Time Frame including present status. • City Staff Meetings -Conducted at least once a month. • Progress Reports -Submitted monthly. • Intergovernmental Coordination The Consultant shall be responsible for conducting all meetings; preparing agendas, public notices, mailing lists; postage; and related activities. The completed Initial Study and appropriate CEQA documents text, tables, charts, and maps must be user friendly and be in a compatible format to the City's word processing software (Microsoft Word 97). In addition to a minimum of 50 hard copies, the completed final update shall be made available on compact disks in a readable format. If it is determined that an EIR is required, the EIR maps shall be coordinated with the City's Planning Department and Geographic Information System (GIS) staff and be formatted in compliance with existing City software requirements (ARCVIEW). SERVICES REQUIRED: If an EIR is required, the following special studies may be required for analyzing demolition related impacts: 1. A Traffic Impact Analysis as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP). 2. Air Quality Study. 3. Review of the submitted Hydrology and Drainage Study. 4. Short-term Noise Impacts. 5. Hazardous Materials Analysis. Provide separate cost evaluations in your proposal for each study listed above AMOUNT BUDGETED: Applicant Deposit Required. CONTRACT TYPE: The City uses a Fixed Fee -Plus Actual Amount of Other Expenses, a professional service contract with a payment schedule based upon scheduled project component completion and City acceptance of the work. P63 BIANE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DRC2007-00951 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL January 17, 2007 Page 3 QUALIFICATIONS: Relevant professional qualifications, management qualifications, relevant project experience, logistical capabilities, financial qualifications, and special terms and conditions. Technical disciplines needed include: acoustical engineer, traffic engineer, fire facilities planner, botanist, and biologist. EVALUATION: Each proposal will be evaluated by the City based on the following criteria: 1. Conciseness and clarity. 2. Professional qualifications and capability of the consultant team that is assigned to the project. 3. Ability of the consultant firm to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the project in the time frame outlined in the RFP response. 4. Experience with similar type projects. 5. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the project and the work to be performed. 6. Competitive cost. The firms that most closely meet the City's needs shall be invited to a presentation and evaluation interview. SUBMISSION DIRECTIONS: Firms interested in responding to this request must submit ten copies of their proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 19, 2008. Proposals received after the prescribed date and time will not be considered. Please address all proposals and inquires regarding this Request for Proposal to: Candyce Burnett Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 LSA June 13, 2001 .. ~. LS ASSO I P64 A ATE3~ INC. C OTHE¢ OFP[CES: FT. COLLIN9 ONE PA¢A PLAZA, 6UITE 500 949~553~D 666 TEL BE¢RELEY IIIV E¢6IDE IBVINE~ CA LIPOIINIA 93614 949.5538076 PAS PT. IIICAS[OND ¢O CAC3N Anthea Hartig City of Rancho Cucamonga Historical Program P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 C/~OFRANCHC CSC ~~N 18 , AMpNGA RFCF/~~0 200 PANNING Subject: Historic Consultation for Cingular Wireless Facility SB 139-01, County of San Bernardino, California Dear Ms. Hartig: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is under contract to Cingulaz Wireless (Cingular) to provide a cultural resource assessment for Cingular facility number SB 139-01, located at 10013 Eighth Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California. The assessment was conducted to identify historic properties (prehistoric or historic sites, buildings, structures, objects, or districts listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places [National Register]), as required by 36 CFR Part 800, the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The facility will consist of four panel antennas and three microwave dishes mounted to the tower facade of a 70 year old building. Specifically, the antennas will be located near the top of the tower of the building but will not project above the existing parapet. Associated equipment will be located on a vacant landscaped area, adjacent to the building. Approximately 30 feet of trenching to the south will be required to obtain utilities. Each antenna is approximately four feet in length and six inches wide and will be painted and textured to match the existing facade. See Attachment A for a photocopy of the site plans. LSA architectural historian Judith Marvin has evaluated the building for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). The building is the Pierre Biane Winery, built in 1930 by an unknown architect. The building does appear to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register under Criteria A and C. Under Criterion A, it is associated with the history of viticulture in Rancho Cucamonga. Under Criterion C, the possibility exists that it might become eligible because it posses distinctive architectural characteristics. The building is a rare remaining example of the Mission style of winery architecture in Southern California. '['he Pierre Biane Winery was designed during the period when buildings of Mission Revival architecture were being constructed for public, commercial, and residential clients, and is a fine example of its type. Our recommendation to the California Office of Historic Preservation will be that although the building appears eligible for the National Register, it will not be adversely affected by the installation of Cingular facility SB 139-01. The antennas will be designed in a way to preserve the visual character of the building, and the placement of the antennas will be reversible in design. Included in Attachment B are the California Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Record (DPR 523A) and Building, Structure, and Object Record (DPR 523B). 6/13101«P:\Pbm030\ArchaeD\letter\SB I39-Ol HistCon.wpd)) PLANNING ENVI¢O NNENTAL SC3ENCC6 DE61GN P65 LfiA A660 CIAT66~ SNC. Pursuant to Section 36 CFR Part 800.3(e), LSA is contacting the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historical Program to solicit comments regarding this Federal undertaking. If you have any comments regarding this facility, please contact me within ten working days of receiving this letter. I can be reached at the above address and telephone number or by e-mail at nicolew@lsa-assoc.com. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Nicole Wallock Archaeologist Attachments: A -Site Plans B - DPR Forms 6/13/01 CC P:\Phm030\Archaeo\IetterlSB 139-01 HittCon.wpd)) P66 L9A A590CIATE9, INC. CINCULAR JUNE ]001 9B I9f-BI ATTACHMENT B DPR FORMS P:\Pbm030\Archaeo\IenerlSB 139-01 His[Con.wpd ((6/13/0 U) P67 State of California -The Resources Agency primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION li-IRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date ?ale l of 4 *Resource \ame Ur #: (ASSiQnerl by rPrnrAPrlRianP Winarv Pl. Other Identifier: Padre Winery/Cucamonga Vintase Comnan *P2. Location: ^ Not for Publication ^ Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7S' Quad Guasti Datel966 (1981 Photo revisedl T 1South ;R 7 West ; SW '/a of NWt/a of Sec l4 ;_B.M. a Address. 995] Eieth Street City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 9]730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ] ] ;445840 mE / 3772320 mN e. Other LOCational Data: fe.g., parcel x, daettinns to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) From Interstate 10 Exit Archibald Avenue. Trove] south on Archibald heading towards Ontario International Airport. Take the left fork in the ramp, left onto Archibald Avenue, right on to Street Eighth Street. Building is located on the south side of Eighth Street, west of Turner Avenue. *P3a. Description: (Describe resource end iu major elements. Include design materials, condition. alterations, size. setting. and boundatiesl See Continuation Sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: ([.istattributesandeodea) HP8 IndustrialBuilding *Pd RPCNrTPPC ~.~o..~. ~ .,_.,, n ... n _.. n _. r, _ .. .Recorded by: (Namc, affiliation, address): Judith Marvin. Date recorded: 5-27-2001 Attachments: None ®Location Map ^Sketch Map ®Continuation Sheet ®Building, Structure, and Object Record ^Archaeologica] Record ^District Record ^Linear Feature Record ^Milling Station Record ^Rock Art Record ^Artifact Record ^Photograph Record ^Other (List) DPR 523A (1/95) 6/7/01 «P:1Pbm030~ArchaeoWrch Eval FormslSB 1391S6139Primarv.wpd» *Required Information Pll. Report citation: (Cite survey report and other sources or enter "none.") Cultural Resource Assessment for Cingular Wireless *Map Name: Guasti Calif *Scale: 124.000 *Da[e of Map: 1966 (19811 r~,~, .~ ~~ -'Cw-eb n ~ ~. IL I 7 5D/ taP Ir ~} ' 41 4 ' ~ ~~ ~~ _ _ yFp. ~~. ~ ~~~~ ' - h ~u Y ~ ~I~Y A1gLj`~ ~b 1 ~ - \V % +0.µ` i3 E'~ ,. y.: -, •• . u + -_ r. ~ ..i;5 52E_. - 4 ~~ _1 ~ 1 ti ___ I 4rh\\ 1~~ S I .. ' ~ n•~ ,_'~ i ~ p j~~ r _ t r J.+t_v .. K ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ . r . 111 ~ $• ~ , I r `}.~` • ~ ~, ~_~ ~ . ntml~ C ~ M ® ~ W ¢ '1210 `I ~f ~~ " 5J' /~5d / ~~ ~ ~~r/K/ _ r .~. Cuca m~ngxn ~ F 6 ~ ~ le ~ m' R ,~~ ® c S' h I tl i~ ~ yrL ~ . " Q ~' `j' D •+ . ~'~UP%+~ ~ , ' : .-. b H~SIm cal Lafl arF f - .k~_. - ~~ _ `\ - gry i .. "~ t ~ ~ p ,oci ~ ~ ~ 1-.. ~ • Ii i~. ark 1.i, • r _7ltlHlli :1'C _- . 2'~. ~ ~i IS ~L f / n ~ .. ., .~` II ~I ir r ~• ~ S z ~ _ I /s ~. l .... ... ,~' .... ....~. ... .~...~ . .. I , .. T •• 1.1 . - -- ' ~ - .-R ReryC lower a i IYJ.SKIm ~ ~ _ ~ . .,I ~~. 1 pT A ATT ,' t e 4 S ; :: - r® ~ ~ T... °,,, . •-_- .. . - ~; WINERY .. I Seen h Va) A 'dli tj -.. ~ _ d . / I _ I .y ,T J ~ t ~ ~ I .~9 F. 1i ~ ., I J. a .ER ,... ~ U ~ 1. .... ~ r ~R _servor .. \ Iv. ~`~° m I 1. ~ 1 1 ~ _. , ~y -. _. ~ ~ _.._.._ ~ I . .. -Well ~-I ~~ ._._ ~ ~ - •~ SL•L. ~ _ ~ ~ ~... -~, ~ ~ • .. irsi r~~ N . / ~ PaM ,_ ~ ~ ~ _.. I, .~. c ~ Cavana ' ~r~' '' '" .. ank r ~ ~ --~, N - ,~ I ~^ s ._ , ~,. _,_ m~m,.. ___~~_ ~ ~ _ . _, ,. ~, e ~'- SCALE 1:24,000 ~ ~~~ -- ~~ ,S f 1 112 0 1 MILE ^ f pq ! ~ ! ' i. <a ~n ' y ..y ^'~ ,D00 D ,DOD 2000 3D00 4000 SD00 6000 TOOOFEEf N , ' i'+ n ~, :: ~ 1 .5 D / gLOME7ER ~ TRUE _ ~ I' r -~. , _ - __ I ~: ~ - DPR 523J (1/9$) *Required Information Paged of ~ *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Biane Winery P69 "Recorded by Iudith Marvin. LSA Associates. Inc. 'Date Mav 27.2001 ®Continuation o Update Pia. The Biane Winery consists of a complex of buildings, of various ages and architectural styles, al] related to the winery operations. The primary building, with a long rectangulaz mass and an end gabled, Mission file roof is constructed of concrete faced with granite river rock. The facade features a central raised, Mission style parapet and series of arches, with chipped granite surrounds and concrete sills. Fenestration in the arches consisu of multi-light metal frame industrial sash. The upper portions of the arches are clad in stucco and appear to have been filled in. Mission style castellated parapets are located at the roofline on either end of the building; both feature hipped roofs and arches. Primary access is via a recessed entryway and the original glass and frame door, flanked by windows, on the east far<ade. Attached to the west elevation of the building is a long brick rectangulaz structure with ten bays, which face north towards the railway spur. The building has a shed roof, relieving arches over the bays, and brick pilasters and cornicing. The west elevation of the building features a large modern farrade of wood and stucco, with a sign advertising the Pierre Biane Winery. The secondary building is an irregularly, shaped multiple story wood structure connected with a corrugated metal building on the west and a shed roofed metal building on the south rear. A large squaze tower is located on the northeast comer of the building; the pyramidal roof clad in corrugated metal. The main structure has a gable roof, also clad in corrugated metal. The building is clad in horizontal V-rustic frame siding. Fenestration consists of 1/1 light frame sash, double hung, staggered at various heights azound the building. Doors are conswcted of vertical boards. A grape crushing facility, a single story rectangular building of cast concrete, is located on the east end of the property, south of the primary building. Concrete grape loading pits aze located on its north and south sides, with a metal conveyor belt extending into the building. Fenestration and doors are of the standard industrial type. A simple Craftsman style office building is located to the reaz of the primary building. It has a low pitched front gable roof with intersecting gabled entryway, horizontal lapped siding, I/1 double hung fi-ame sash windows, and a post on pier foundation. Other facilities, including warehouses and sheds, are located on the property. The front yard of the winery features river rock pillars, connected with swagged chains, clipped hedges, and a ]awn, Grape vines are planted on the west side; the rear feamres a wisteria arbor, fan and date palms, orange groves, and pepper and Eucalyptus trees. DPR 523E (1/95) *Required Information 6/7/01«P:\Pbm030\Archaeo\Arch Eval Forms\SB 139\SB139ConShea.wpd» P70 Bl. Historic Name: Padre Winery/ Cucamonea Vinevard Comoanv B2. Common Name: Biane Winery B3. Original Use: Winery B4. Present Use: Winery *B5. Architectural Style: Mission Revival. Craftsman *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The primary building was constructed in 1909; the dates of the others are unknown, but appear to have been built over a period of years dating to the 1960s. *B7. Moved? ®No ~ Yes ~ Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: V Buildings as noted on Primary Form; spur on Eighth Street B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme Aericultural and Commercial Develooment Area Rancho Cucamonga Period oCSigniScance 1909-oresent Property Type Winery Applicable Criteria A and C (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, end geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The Biane Winery appears to be e]igible for inclusion in the Nations] Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C, and the California Register of Historical Resources under Criteria I and 3. The Padre Winery Company, also operating under the name of the Cucamonga Vineyard Company, was the leading winery in Southern California in the days afterthe repeal ofProhibition and before the beginning of World War I. The company, which dates from the 1870s, entered its modern period in 1909, when it was acquired by James Vai. During Prohibition, the company operatedas the California Medicinal Wine Co., but by the mid-1950s the 3.5 million gallon winery was specializing in bulk process sparkling wine. Vai died in 1961, business declined in the 1970s, and the winery was sold in bankruptcy in 1981. As one of the few wineries remaining in the Cucamonga area from the boom years of the early 1900s, the winery continues m use today as it did when first established. Ii has one of a fast declining number of vineyards in the azea; where 20,000 acres of vines were growing in 1960, there are only 1,000 in the 1990s. Under Criteria C and 3, the building is a rare remaining example of the Mission style of winery architecture in Southern California. The Padre Winery was designed during the period when buildings of Mission Revival architecture were being constructed for pubic, commercial, and residential clients and is a fine example of its type (see continuation sheet) Bll. Additional Resource Attributes: (List atvibutes end codes) *B12. References: The Architecture of Los Angeles, Paul Gleye, Rosebud Books, Los Angeles, 1981; A Companion to California Wine, Charles L. Sullivan, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998; Primary and Building, Structure and Object Forms, M 'll 1 8 Lynn em , 9 7. B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Judith Marvin LSA Associates. Inc. One Park Plaza. Suite 500 Irvine. CA 92614 *Date of Evaluation: Mav 27, 2001 (This space reserved for official commenu.) (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) __ ~_ O J ~~ T i i l ~__~ ~p DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information 6/7/01 «P:~Pbm030W.rchacoV.rch Eval FormslS$ 139tSB 139BSO.wpd» Page 4 of 4 NRHP Status Code *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Biane Winery ~ ,. .>-:, /tom\~:,nf~\ .. .. ~= _ ~ S ` , `~.. rP71'^ ~..,, " '~ ~ '~6 February~19,n2'008 ,." ' r.. r. - s' r ~ ~ 5' 1 y-r-. J k}(Y r .. J 1~ L ¢ Fiane ~Fus~ue s ;=~ .. =~~ ~~ f ro.' W H ~: . P ~~ -pro' e~g':c:~ ~ ~ r ~ * ~, ~~ s: z A ~ '`, 4 ~: Yy ~11N) ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~~ ~ :4'y k'. .~` ~ 4 )fin .i ~ ! ...M 5 ~ ;yy~i ~^; _ i R'..~ rfe f k~~~n~b'~~~'xi.~ ~ ~ db6 ,>r ~yv ~..~mvc+-r8~ ,ri / ~k ~ ~,t~gAei ~> a V r .E: gsjrmiY, ~.-,:za .i ~~1"~ S ` r{$.a_.Y~, ~ k.. ,. i'~~ ~ ~- r ~ JNh'~~.,.r.:v~, r,. c,:: :::..; ._~ Spey ~,. ,4k fNI ~'~. L t A 1 ' ..., P .S. ~ _ nN 'l. ! l i 1~ s 1 q//' 3 } ~ 1pF" t.aa~_ ' r.~ ItWxTV r&.-..,J r'' 5 !~ a ~ ~Pa' ~ ° s . h ',.Y~ .+ .. i4ara+LV+.eeav!` W •^ ~k +~'+ dJ +3' a ~ ~ -~ x ~} 1t~~ r .tea-.4~ r.'~ . .. ~ 't•~ SZ./ ? r ~ ~ 'j z ~ ~'~~, t~~ ~ i .. ~~ 1 1 r' i '~ w fr s 1 ~. t ~. iGY+~f ea+¢uvaa 1 ~ Sl xl"Y n~1ACd ^h'`~" ~.IN ~•g i ~i d. L e s f ~~„ ~~ ~;~ '~* Sys t e ~+~~ r / ~. x ~~~^~,,~ ~ ck ,~,{ Ypi 1 a ~i G .. u; 1• us ~i''y '' F'1 ~ ; h..s~ t 1 ~ 1 6 ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ M ~S, 4 x', r'<d trey{ _ r ~.Y 'I 4 .n# f .LV ~ ~ r. y ~A `S~. S2CA^~' • a. rACY'~^'~N 1~ W 1 J .. ~ P~ ..:. p ' .. ..x C /-0, /Y ~6.. ~, d 4 vu. .»_ , _ ' ., ...... . _. .... R_ ~ , 1 .. ,, ... _. {. ~Peepared for: City of .Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by: RBF Consulting ~xh~~~%f ~' P72 i -' I _~ ~ ~ ~ J CONSULTING I, , i February 19, 2008 FEB 1 9 2008 Ms. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner RECEIVED -PLANNING City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Biane Business Park Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Ms. Burnett: RBF Consulting is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to prepare an Initial Study and subsequent environmental document (either a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report) for the Biane Business Park Project. We understand that the project site is located within the southwestern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, along the southern side of East 8~' Street, east of the Archibald Avenue, and west of Hermosa Avenue. The project involves the redevelopment of the Biane Winery. The Biane Winery is a 10.41 acre site and includes 1.14 acres of active grape vineyards. Existing uses also include nine structures consisting of a main building, warehouse building, two storage facilities, and three single-family homes. The proposal involves demolition of the existing structures and construction of 239,370 square feet of industrial warehouse uses. Based upon our review of available project information, a visit to the site on February 12, 2008, and our current work effort in Rancho Cucamonga for the Carrari Ranch Project, we have developed a comprehensive understanding of the issues and concerns involved with the project. We believe that our background in Rancho Cucamonga and the experience of our team members are key attributes that we can provide to this assignment. In summary, RBF offers the following benefits for your consideration: • Project Team Commitment and Availabi/ity: The designated Team will be led by Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, serving as Project Director and Mr. Alan Ashimine, serving as Project Manager. Resumes for each team member are included in this submittal. • Legally Defensible Documentation: Throughout RBF's 36 years of preparing environmental documentation, we have attained extensive experience in writing accurate, -- legally defensible environmental documents for all types of development, policy, and infrastructure projects. • Experience with Similar Projects: Our resume includes several infill/redevelopment projects in highly sensitive environments. Project references include the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in Rancho Cucamonga, the Pacific Trade Focused EIR in EI Monte, the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Upland, North Village Specific Plan EIR for the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel PLANNING &" DESIGN R: CONSTRUCTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 14725 Atton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618-2027 • P.O. Box 57057, Irvine, CA 92619-7057 • 949.472.3505 • Fax 949.472.8373 Offices located throughout California, Arizona & Nevada • www.RBrcom pmtW m reM•e cew~ j City of Rancho Cucamonga P7g I February 19, 2008 Page 2 i i EIR Project, Vineyard Center Specific Plan EIR in Ontario, the North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transitvillage Plan EIR/EA, the EI Centro de Huntington Park in Huntington Park, and Cypress Business Park Environmental Review. Multi-Disciplinary Capabilities: RBF possess a unique in-house network of over 1,000 professionals in disciplines including Planning/Environmental Services, Transportation Engineering, Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public Works, Water/Wastewater and Hydrology), Mechanical/Electrical/Energy Engineering, Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) and GIS Services, Mapping, Surveying, Aerial Photogrammetry and Media Services, which results in a coordinated and efficient effort, with full-service consulting capabilities within one firm. i Diverse Planning and Environmental Services: RBF's Planning Department offers an extensive background of services and expertise for projects including Environmental Impact ~~ ~ Reports, Mitigated Negative Declarations, General Plans, Specific Plans, Due Diligence Reports, Urban Design, Entitlement Processing, NEPA Review, Noise Studies, View Analysis, Hazardous Assessments and Air Quality Modeling. The RBF Planning ~- Department also includes the Urban Design Studio (UDS) division. Excellent Track Record of Meeting Schedules and Budgets: RBF has proven capabilities to effectively complete environmental studies on time and on budget. We appreciate your consideration of RBF Consulting for the Biane Business Park Project and are available to begin the work program immediately. The undersigned is an agent authorized to submit proposals on behalf of RBF Consulting and is authorized to negotiate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on this project. We welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss further clarify the work program. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 949.855.3663 if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Glenn Lajoie, AICP Vice President Planning and Environmental Services ~. r, I~ r, ~, ~~ 1 ~~ i.. 1. r_; ~_ . I ~. ~_, L. PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Biane Business Park Project Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga Submitted by: RBF CONSULTING February 19, 2008 P74 P75 ~~ I TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction and Understanding of the Project ................................................................. ................1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... ................1 1.2 Unders tanding of the Project ............................................................................... ................1 II. Scope of Work . ................................................................................................................. ...:-............4 1.0 Project Scoping ................................................................................................... ................4 1.1 Project Kick-Off and Project Characteristics .......................................... ................4 1.2 Research and Investigation .................................................................... ................4 1.3 Agency Consultation .............................................................................. ................4 1.4 Field Reconnaissance ............................................................................ ................5 1.5 Preparation of the Initial Study ............................................................... ................5 1.6 Initial Study Determination ..................................................................... ................5 1.7 Deliverables ............................................................................................ ................5 2.0 Alterna tive 1 -Preparation of a MND ................................................................. ................5 2.1 Preparation of a Screen Check MND ..................................................... ................5 2.1.1 Environmental Analysis ............................................................. ................5 2.1.2 Graphic Exhibits ......................................................................... ................7 2.1.3 Screen Check Draft MND .......................................................... ................7 2.2 Draft MND ............................................................................................... ................7 2.3 Final MND ............................................................................................... ................8 2.3.1 Response to Comments .........................:.................................. ................8 2.3.2 Mitigation Monitoring Program ................................................... ................8 2.4 Notice of Determination .......................................................................... ................8 2.5 Meetings and Coordination .................................................................... ................8 2.6 Deliverables ............................................................................................ ................9 3.0 Alterna tive 2 -Preparation of an EIR .................................................................. ................9 3.1 Notice of Preparation .............................................................................. ................9 3.2 Scoping Meeting ..................................................................................... ................9 3.3 Preparation of a Screen Check EIR ....................................................... ..............10 3.3.1 Introduction and Purpose .......................................................... ..............10 3.3.2 Executive Summary .................................................................. ..............10 3.3.3 Project Description .................................................................... ..............10 3.3.4 Thresholds of Significance ........................................................ ..............10 3.3.5 Cumulative Projects to Be Considered ..................................... ..............10 3.3.6 Environmental Analysis ............................................................. ..............11 3.3.7 Effects Found Not to be Significant ........................................... ..............19 3.3.8 Growth Inducement ................................................................... ..............19 3.3.9 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................... ...........:..19 3.3.10 Alternatives to the Proposed Action .......................................... ..............19 3.3.11 Additional Sections .................................................................... ..............20 3.3.12 Graphic Exhibits ........................................................................ ..............20 3.4 Draft EIR ................................................................................................. ..............21 3.4.1 Preliminary Draft EIR ................................................................. ..............21 3.4.2 Completion of the Draft EIR ...................................................... ..............21 3.5 Final EIR ................................................................................................. ..............21 3.5.1 Response to Comments ............................................................ ..............21 3.5.2 Mitigation Monitoring Program ................................................... ..............22 3.5.3 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations .............. ..............22 3.6 Project Coordination and Meetings ........................................................ ..............22 3.6.1 Coordination .............................................................................. ..............22 3.6.2 Meetings .................................................................................... ..............23 3.7 Deliverables ............................................................................................ ..............23 i 3.7.1 NOP Distribution ............................................................. .........................23 3.7.2 Preparation of Screen Check Draft EIR .......................... .........................23 3.7.3 Draft EIR ......................................................................... .........................23 3.7.4 Final EIR ......................................................................... .........................24 III. Preliminary Project Schedule ................................................................................ .........................25 IV. Summary of Qualifcations ................................................................................... ..........................26 V. Project Team ........................................................................................................ ..........................36 VI. Statement of Financial Conditions ........................................................................ ..........................40 VII. Budget ................................................................................................................. ..........................42 1.0 Preparation of an Iriitial Study ................................................................. ..........................42 2.0 Preparation of an MND ............................................................................ ..........................42 3.0 Preparation of an EIR .............................................................................. ..........................43 i I l r i i I P76 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services . . ^ CONSULTING i. INTRODUCTION AND UNDERSTANDING OF _.. THE PROJECT 7.1 INTRODUCTION RBF Consulting (RBF) has submitted this Proposal to prepare an Initial Study and either a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess potential impacts and identify mitigation measures for the proposed Biane Business Park Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Initial Study and subsequent environmental document will be prepared in accordance with the criteria, standards and provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Section 21000 et. sec. of the State EIR Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000), the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Guidelines, and the regulations requirements and procedures of _, any other responsible Public Agency with jurisdiction by law. RBF will, throughout the document, and where appropriate, relate the proposed project to the general trends in Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding area. The proposed Scope of Services has been prepared in accordance with the City's Request for Proposals. Each of the issues is approached thoroughly in order to fully assess all potential impacts, establish thresholds of significance, and identify mitigation measures. 7.2 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking to retain a consultant to prepare an Initial Study _- for the Biane Business Park Project. The project site is located within the southwestern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, along the southern side of East 8'~ Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and west of Hermosa Avenue. The project consists of the redevelopment of the former Biane Winery. The 10.41-acre project site is currently occupied by active grapevines, a 75,000 square foot main building, 16,000 square foot warehouse building, two storage facilities (1,000 square feet and 1,500 square feet), and three single-family homes ranging from 900 to 1,200 square feet in size. The project proposes to demolish the existing uses/structures and construct 239,370 square feet of industrial warehouse building facilities. The scale of the project, as well as its geographical location, requires consideration of environmental, planning and design criteria. Careful consideration is necessary for on-site conditions and compatibility of the projects with the surrounding community. RBF will serve as an extension of City staff to assure that the entire CEQA process is conducted in a comprehensive manner, which will include consideration of recent CEQA legislation and requirements of reviewing agencies. The RBF project management team led by Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, and Mr. Alan Ashimine, will provide regular and consistent communications and updates to staff on the progression of the work program and status of the analysis. The project initiation will involve a detailed scoping process including a review of issues, constraints and project opportunities. RBF will embark on an agency consultation process which will be an opportunity to get a better understanding of key agency/community P77 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 1 February 19, 2008 ~-~ r-~ (. r-' t i~ i Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING concerns. RBF will prepare an Initial Study to determine whether an MND or an EIR will be necessary. This proposal includes a scope of work to conduct an Initial Study. The Initial Study would provide preliminary impact analysis, allowing the City to consider the project's environmental and community effects and determine the appropriate subsequent environmental document. This proposal also includes two alternative scenarios following completion of the Initial Study process for either an MND or EIR. Under either scenario, the primary issues having the potential to result in a significant environmental impact are described below: Aesthetics, Light, and Glare: RBF will evaluate the proposed project's potential impacts in regards to aesthetics, light, and glare. RBF will analyze the existing goals and policies within the General Plan, and any other applicable documents, and assess the projects short- and long-term impacts on the surrounding community. r- Air Quality: Air emissions resulting from project construction and buildout will be studied. Emissions associated with project vehicular trips will be evaluated in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's modeling criteria. Cultural Resources: The environmental document will evaluate and analyze the potential impacts to the existing structures on the project site. The structures on-site will require detailed analysis, since preliminary analysis indicates that the structures (dating back to the 1930's) could be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. RBF will utilize the existing Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the proposed project. r I ,_. • Hazards and Hazardous Materials: RBF will analyze the potential hazards and hazardous materials on-site. RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment for the project and incorporate the findings of the study into the environmental document. • Hydrology and Water Quality: The environmental document will analyze the project's potential to affect water quality in the site vicinity as a result of off-site drainage impacts, based on hydrology design information provided to RBF. RBF will also perform a peer review of the prepared Hydrology and Drainage Study. • Land Use and Relevant Planning: The environmental document will analyze the project's consistency with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. I Noise: Project noise impacts to sensitive areas (schools and residents) in close ' proximity to the site will be addressed. Impacts along local roadways and to f sensitive receptors in the vicinity will be analyzed. 1' Transportation and Traffic: The environmental document will address on-site and off-site traffic impacts, turning movements, parking, circulation modifications and P78 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 2 • February 19, 2008 ^ . ' CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services improvements for nearby roadways and regional facilities, in accordance with City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino requirements. • Public Services and Utilities: The ability of existing public services and infrastructure to support development and increased demand will be assessed in the environmental document. • Growth Inducing Impacts: The potential for growth inducing impacts will be evaluated in accordance with local and regional projections. The RBF project team will play in integral role in the project review process and will participate in meetings with staff and public hearings, as required by the City. The environmental review process will result in the presentation of pertinent information associated with project impacts and findings to the City decision makers for determination and CEQA approval. ~.... P79 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 3 • February 19, 2008 r h i C ON SLI LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 11. SCOPE OF WORK The following Scope of Work has been prepared based upon information received from the City of r Rancho Cucamonga. The cost estimate, which is itemized according to task and issue, is included in Section VII. As stated previously, this proposal provides for an Initial Study, followed by alternative scenarios for either an MND or an EIR. 1.0 PROJECT SLOPING 1.1 PROJECT KICK-OFF AND PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The work program will be initiated with a formal kick-off meeting with City Staff to discuss the project features in'greater detail. This initial meeting is vital to the success of the CEQA process and will be a key milestone in order to confirm the parameters of the analysis, project construction program assumptions, proposed buildout conditions, scheduling and overall communications. Prior to the kick-off, RBF will distribute akick-off meeting agenda and detailed memorandum, which will identify information needs. Based upon the detailed project information obtained at the project kick-off, RBF will draft a preliminary project description for review and approval by City Staff. 1.2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION RBF will obtain and review available referenced data for the project area, including policy documentation from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State and Federal agencies, the Southern California Association of Governments and all other agencies which may be affected by the project. This information, along with environmental data and information available from the City and other nearbyjurisdictions, will become part of the foundation of the subsequent environmental document and will be reviewed and incorporated into the analysis, as deemed appropriate. 1.3 AGENCY CONSULTATION As indicated in Section 15083 of CEQA, many public agencies have found that early consultation solves many potential conflicts that could arise in more serious forms later in the review process. Although the NOP will provide that opportunity, RBF will conduct additional discussions with local, state and federal agencies which will assist in the early stages of the analysis and issue delineation. This scoping can be an effective way to bring together and resolve the concerns of affected Federal, State and local agencies as well as the local community. P80 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 4 • February 19, 2008 ~_, j' ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 7.4 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE As a part of the early scoping for the project, the RBF Team will conduct a field study of the site, review existing land use and environmental conditions and conduct i a detailed photographic recording of on-site and surrounding uses. 7.5 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY RBF will prepare the Initial Study for the proposed project. The Initial Study will L_. describe the project, the project location, and a description of the environmental setting of the proposed project site. The main body of the document will consist of a City-approved environmental checklist and an accompanying environmental analysis. The project will be analyzed for its potential to create significant environmental impacts in the areas specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The Initial Study will also include mandatory findings of significance regarding impacts upon cultural resources, biological resources, cumulative impacts, and direct and indirect impacts upon human beings. 1.6 INITIAL STUDY DETERMINATION This section will denote the appropriate CEQA action based upon the Environmental Checklist/Environmental Analysis. The RBF Project Management Team will meet with City Staff to review the analysis, findings, and advise on the recommendation of preparing either an MND or EIR. Section 2.0, Alternative 1 -Preparation of an MND, and Section 3.0, Alternative 2-Preparation of an EIR, which follow, provide detailed scopes for the preparation of either document. As directed by the City, RBF will proceed with the preparation of compliance documentation in accordance with the scope of work presented in this proposal. 7.7 DELIVERABLES Twenty (20) copies of the Initial Study One (1) camera ready copy of the Initial Study One (1) electronic copy of the Initial Study 2.0 ALTERNATIVE 7 -PREPARATION OF AN MND 2.1 PREPARATION OF A SCREENCHECK DRAFT MND 2.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Environmental Analysis section will provide supporting information for the conclusions rendered in the Environmental Checklist. The MND will analyze all impact categories as mandated by the CEQA Guidelines. P81 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 5 • February 19, 2008 ~' r_. ^ ' C~NSLI LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services Aesthetics -The MND will evaluate the project's potential aesthetic impacts, focusing on temporary construction-related disturbances and the development of 239,370 square feet of business park use. Mitigation measures will be provided, as necessary, to minimize impacts to less than significant levels. Agricultural Resources -The MND will evaluate the project's potential impacts to Agricultural Resources from the loss of grapevine fields. To minimize impacts to less than significant levels, mitigation measures will be provided, as necessary. Air Quality -RBF will quantify project emissions in accordance with SCAQMD methodology, utilizing required modeling software. This task shall include a description of existing conditions, analysis of construction- and operation- related impacts, and an analysis of consistency with localized significance thresholds. In addition, RBF will also qualitatively address global warming issues as they pertain to the global climate change initiative (Assembly Bill 32). Biological Resources -Impacts to Biological Resources are not anticipated. However, RBF will utilize existing documentation, including the City's General Plan and General Plan EIR, to confirm existing conditions and provide an impact analysis in this regard. Cultural Resources-RBF will provide a description of existing conditions in regards to cultural resources, including archeological, historical, and paleontological resources, utilizing the prepared Cultural Resources Assessment and existing documentation. Geoloov and Soils-The MND will examine the grading/excavation required forthe project, on-site/regional seismic conditions, and exposure of people/structures to adverse seismic affects and soil characteristics (i.e., erosion, expansion, instability) associated with project implementation. Hazards and Hazardous Materials -RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment to evaluate the potential for hazardous materials and characterize the expected nature of hazardous materials that may be present. This section will utilize the Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment to analyze construction- and operational-related impacts. The MND will examine construction- and operational- related impacts to surrounding uses. Hvdrolooy and Water Quality- RBF will utilize the prepared Hydrology and Drainage Study in addition to existing information and documentation to perform analysis of the project's potential impacts. Analysis will review the project's affects on drainage and water quality for both the construction process and during long-term operation. RBF will utilize the Hydrology and Drainage Study as the basis for the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the MND. Land Use and Planning -The MND will analyze the project's consistency with the City's General Plan and Zoning Code. This section will also examine the project's compatibility with existing surrounding land uses in the site vicinity. City of Rancho Cucamonga • 6 • February 19, 2008 i L. P82 I I ~- i ^ ^ ^ ^ C ONSLJ LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services Mineral Resources -The MND will analyze and examine the project's potential to impact the City's mineral resources. Noise -The MND analysis will focus on short-term construction noise and overall changes in ambient noise levels associated during construction of the project. The analysis will discuss the acoustical effects on surrounding sensitive receptors during short-term construction and long-term operations. Population and Housing -The MND will analyze the project's potential for growth inducement and the possibility for the project to displace housing or people. Public Services -Impacts to Public Services are not anticipated. However, the MND will confirm existing conditions and provide impact analysis in this regard. Recreation -Impacts to Recreation are not anticipated. However, the MND will confirm existing conditions and provide impact analysis in this regard. Transportation and Traffic -The MND will examine the project's potential construction-related impacts due to the ingresslegress of construction workers, heavy trucks, and other construction equipment. In addition, RBF will analyze the project's potential operational impacts due to the construction of a business park. Utilities and Service Systems -RBF will analyze potential impacts to existing utilities and service systems with the implementation of the proposed project. The ability of existing infrastructure to support the proposed project will be evaluated in terms of increased demand for utility service, such as water, electricity, gas, and wastewater. 2.1.2 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS The environmental document will include a maximum of five (5) exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify the project and potential environmental impacts. Exhibits are anticipated to include: Regional Vicinity Map, Site Vicinity Map, and Site Plan Map. 2.1.3 SCREENCHECK DRAFT MND RBF will submit five (5) copies of the Screencheck Draft MND for review and comment by the City. This scope of work assumes that any revisions desired by the City will be consolidated into one complete set of comments. RBF will incorporate comments from the City and submit one (1) "fnal check copy' of the final draft document for review and comment by the City. RBF will incorporate one additional complete set of comments received from the City. Should additional copies be required, additional copies will be provided by RBF at an additional fee. 2.2 DRAFT MND RBF will develop a distribution list (previous commenting agencies/parties, responsible public agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties) and distribute City of Rancho Cucamonga .7. February 19, 2008 P83 r-• ~ ~ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services CONSULTING up to fifty (50) copies of the Draft MND for public review. RBF will also post the Notice of Availability for the Draft MND at the County Clerk's office and send copies ' of the document to the State Clearinghouse. This scope of work assumes that the City will perform any radius mailing/newspaper ad posting for the project. 2.3 FINAL MND The Final MND shall be composed of the Response to Comments and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. RBF will submit ten (10) copies and one (1) camera-ready copy of the Final MND to the City 2.3.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS r RBF will prepare responses to public comments received during the public review period. In addition, RBF will prepare the errata for any changes to the Draft MND text. This task is limited to a maximum of 30 hours. 2.3.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM To comply with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 3180), RBF will prepare a Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program that will be submitted to the City for review and comment. RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be defined through working with staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps and procedures in order to provide a basis for monitoring such measures during and upon project implementation. RBF will provide one camera-ready copy of the finalized Mitigation Monitoring Program. 2.4 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RBF will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the proposed project and file it with the California State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk. This scope of work assumes that the City will be responsible for the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) NOD filing fee, if applicable. 2.5 MEETINGS AND COORDINATION Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, and Mr. Alan Ashimine will be responsible for quality control, oversight of the analysis, and the management and supervision of the Environmental Review as well as consultation with the City. Mr. Lajoie and/or Mr. Ashimine will undertake consultation and coordination of the project and review the Environmental Studies for compliance with CEQA requirements. RBF will attend project meetings, will represent the City at public hearings, and make presentations at these meetings if necessary. This task assumes attendance at two (2) project meetings with City staff (including the kick-off meeting) and one (1) public meeting City of Rancho Cucamonga .g. February 19, 2008 P84 r^ i ~ , ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSI~LTIN6 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ,--- for the project hearing. Additional meetings shall be billed on a Time and Materials basis. 2.6 DELIVERABLES Five (5) copies of the Screencheck Draft MND One (1) electronic copy of the Screencheck Draft MND • One (1) "final check copy" of the Screencheck Draft MND • Fifty (50) copies of the Draft MND One (1) camera ready copy of the Draft MND • One (1) electronic copy of the Draft MND Five (5) copies of the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program • Five (5) copies of the Draft Response to Comments Ten (10) copies of the Final MND • One (1) camera ready copy of the Final MND One (1) electronic copy of the Final MND 3.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR 3.7 NOTICE OF PREPARATION RBF will prepare, distribute, and file the NOP for the EIR. A Draft NOP will be prepared and forwarded to City Staff for review and comment. RBF will then finalize the NOP for distribution. The distribution will be based on aCity-approved distribution list of affected agencies and interested parties, to be prepared by RBF in conjunction with City staff. This task includes certified mailing to a maximum of fifty addresses. This task includes either radius mailings or a newspaper notice. 3.2 SLOPING MEETING A public scoping meeting, which can also involve federal, state or other local agencies, will be set up as a brief project overview presentation, so that the community can gain an understanding of the proposed project and make comments based upon accurate knowledge of the proposed project. The scoping meeting will emphasize the review process and will be presented so that the community can gain a greater understanding of the proposed project, as well as the intent and requirements of CEQA. RBF will provide handouts and up to two presentation-size graphics to supplement the discussion. Following the presentation, the meeting will be devoted to public participation, questions and comments. Written comment forms will be provided for this purpose, and these comments, along with verbal comments, will become a part of the administrative record. P85 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 9 • February 19, 2008 ^ ^ ^ ^ C CNSLJ LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 3.3 PREPARATION OF SCREENCHECK EIR 3.3.7 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA and the City of Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Implementation procedures for which the proposed project is subject to. This section will identify the purpose of the study and statutory authority as well document scoping procedures, summary of the EIR format, listing of responsible and trustee agencies and documentation incorporated by reference. 3.3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Executive Summary will include a Project Summary, an overview of project impacts, mitigation and levels of significance after mitigation, summary of project alternatives and areas of controversy and issues to be resolved. The Environmental Summary will be presented in a columnar format. 3.3.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project Description section of this EIR will detail the project location, background and history of the project, discretionary actions, characteristics, goals and objectives, construction program, phasing, agreements, and permits and approvals that are required based on available information. This section will include a summary of the local environmental setting for the project. Exhibits depicting the regional and site vicinity will be included in this section. Applicant prepared plan information and an aerial photograph are to be included within the Project Description. 3.3.4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE This section will provide a comprehensive description of thresholds of significance for each issue area of the environmental analysis. The significance threshold criteria will be described and will provide the basis for conclusions of significance. Primary sources to be used in identifying the criteria include the CEQA Guidelines, local, State, Federal or other standards applicable to an impact category. 3.3.5 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED In accordance with Section 15130 of CEQA, this section provides a detailed listing of cumulative projects and actions under consideration for the analysis. As stated in Task 3.1.9, Cumulative Impacts, the likelihood of occurrence and level of severity will be studied. The purpose of this section is to present a listing and description of projects, past, present and anticipated in the reasonably foreseeable future, even if those projects are outside of the jurisdiction of Rancho Cucamonga. The potential for impact and levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of interaction with the project area. RBF will consult with City staff and other applicable local jurisdictions to define the appropriate study area for the cumulative analysis, as described in Task 3.1.9. P86 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 10 • February 19, 2008 _. i ^ ^ . ^ CONSLI LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 3.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential adverse effects of project implementation (both individual and cumulative), and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised during the scoping process (NOP responses, and any other relevant and valid informative sources) will also be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all available data, results from additional research, and an assessment of existing technical data. These analyses will be performed by qualified Environmental Analysts, CEQA Experts, and Planners at RBF. The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for each environmental issue area, identify short-term construction and !~ long-term environmental impacts associated with the project and their levels of significance. The impact analysis will be in a consistent order of environmental factors as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (Aesthetics, Agricultural, Air Quality, etc.). The thresholds for significance shall be identified for every environmental issue. A discussion will be provided for all environmental issues determined to be No Impact or Less Than Significant Impact, explaining why these determinations i were made and that no further analysis in the EIR is warranted. The Impact Subsection will provide a detailed analysis of each issue determined to be Less Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated or Potentially Significant Impact. For each environmental issue requiring EIR analysis, the EIR will state the level of significance and then provide the analysis discussion, mitigation measures specific to this environmental issue, and level of significance after mitigation for that environmental issue. This section will include analysis for the following ! environmental issue areas: A. Aesthetics, Light, and Glare The issue of aesthetics is in some ways a subjective consideration. What is visually offensive to some may not be of great concern to others. Nevertheless, the issue does require review, based upon the criteria set forth in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and input received at the public scoping meeting for the EIR. The evaluation for this project will be based upon a review of plan information and on-site reconnaissance. RBF will characterize the existing aesthetic environment and visual resources, including a discussion of views within the site and views from surrounding areas to the site, particularly from the adjacent uses. Project construction impacts will be addressed based on the site's aesthetic changes visible from surrounding roadways and locations. RBF will evaluate available architectural and design standards for the project. Mitigation measures such as perimeter landscaping, building design, articulation, screening, and setbacks may be recommended to reduce the significance of potential visual impacts. Color site photographs will be provided which will show on-site and surrounding views. This section will analyze potential view impairments (if any) to adjacent uses as a result of project implementation. The compatibility of the project's architectural features, height and building City of Rancho Cucamonga • 11 February 19, 2008 P87 i Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ~- ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING ;- materials with the on-site uses and the surrounding area will be reviewed. RBF will also address potentially significant impacts generated by the introduction of light and glare from of the proposed project. This analysis will discuss light and glare impacts (from streetlights, vehicle headlights, building lights, etc.) on neighboring sensitive uses. RBF will review and incorporate existing City policies and guidelines regarding light and glare for inclusion within the EIR. RBF will recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential aesthetic and light and glare impacts to the maximum extent possible. B. Air Quality RBF's Air Quality Specialists will evaluate project-related air pollutant emissions on both ashort-term and long-term basis and prepare an Air - Quality Study. The Air Quality Study will include the following which will be j incorporated into the EIR: Existing Conditions. The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). RBF will describe the meteorological conditions and discuss ambient air monitoring data collected for the nearest monitoring station. A description of the regulatory framework relating to air quality (i.e., California Clean Air Act, Air Quality Management Plan, etc.) will also be provided. Construction-Related Emissions. Equipment exhaust and fugitive dust emissions resulting from construction activities will be quantified using URBEMIS2007. Based on landform/grading/demolition/excavation data and assumptions provided by the project Applicant (i.e., number/type of equipment needed for grading activities, project phasing, etc.), the analysis will estimate equipment exhaust emissions utilizing the latest emission factors as prescribed by the EMFAC2007 and OFFROADS2007 models. Emissions from soil hauling activities will also be quantified, if necessary. Fugitive dust emissions will be quantified based upon the area to be graded per day. Construction pollutant emissions will be compared to SCAQMD thresholds and mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of emissions, where feasible. Construction related Localized Significance Thresholds will be analyzed and discussed. RBF will also qualitatively discuss naturally occurring asbestos impacts as they relate to the proposed construction activities. Long-Term Emissions. RBF will quantify vehicular and area source emissions then provide a comparison to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. The emissions will be quantitatively derived utilizing the EMFAC2007 and URBEMIS2007 models. Project consistency with regional air quality plans will be evaluated. RBF will address cumulative air quality impacts based upon a list of cumulative projects supplied by the City. Should project traffic warrant Carbon Monoxide Hotspot modeling, RBF will model intersections utilizing the BREEZE ROADS model. The analysis will be consistent with the Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 • February 19, 2008 P88 r__ i~ ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services Protocol, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis. Currently no guidelines on how to approach the preparation of a Global Climate Change Impact Analysis. Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California Air Resources Board (GARB), or the SCAQMD have not developed significance thresholds for climate change. In the absence of such guidance, the analysis will assess the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) produced by the proposed project. As there is no significance threshold set for GHG emissions, this report will not address significance issues; rather it will be intended to inform the public of the GHGs emitted. RBF will describe the regulatory status of climate change legislation in the United States and California. RBF will draft a short section describing the status of regulatory development of AB-32 (Global Warming Solutions Act), with an emphasis on the preliminary nature of the legislation. In addition, this section will briefly describe the current state of Federal legislation, including a discussion of whether such legislation is likely to pre- empt the current California legislation. Note that this scope explicitly excludes RBF from developing Global Climate Change thresholds or emissions inventories for the City. C. Cultural Resources This section will incorporate the results of the Cultural Resources Assessment to be provided by the City. The EIR will utilize the Assessment regarding archaeological, paleontological, and historical resources to provide a description of existing conditions, potential impacts, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures, if necessary. RBF will evaluate potential cultural impacts of the proposed project, include a discussion regarding existing conditions and historical use of the project site, and incorporate the Cultural Resources Assessment conclusions into the EIR section. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessmentto evaluate the existing conditions of the project. The objectives of the Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment is to: (1) evaluate the potential for hazardous materials on the site based upon readily discernible andlor documented present and historic on-site uses and uses immediately adjacent to the site, and (2) generally characterize the expected nature of hazardous materials that may be present as a result of such uses, within the limits imposed by the scope of the Assessment. Materials that may constitute a hazardous waste include, but are not limited to petroleum products, pesticides, organic compounds, heavy metals, or other compounds injurious to human health and the environment. The Assessment is designed to document past activities, facilities, or waste disposal practices, which may have resulted in soil or groundwater contamination. Past site usage will be investigated through an aerial City of Rancho Cucamonga •13• February 19, 2008 P89 i~ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ^ ^ . CONSULTING f~ photograph review, interviews, review of former permits, review of ~ documents on City file, and a research of former citations from state and local agencies. Current site conditions will be documented by an on-site ~.. inspection of the project area. RBF will utilize the Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment and analyze the potential impacts of the proposed project. The potential for hazardous materials to exist on-site due to historical uses will be analyzed, impacts will be discussed for both construction and long-term operation of the project, and mitigation measures will be recommend as necessary. E. Hydrology and Water Quality RBF will perform a peer review of the Hydrology and Drainage Study to be ~ , provided by the City for the Biane Business Park Project. RBF will review the report to ensure that it contains a review of existing documentation, watershed boundary delineation, existing conditions analysis, analysis of 1, proposed hydrology, analysis of proposed drainage facilities, and proposed water quality features. The review will also assess preliminary design assumptions. The Hydrology and Drainage Study will be reviewed to assure that it conforms to City and/or County of San Bernardino master plans of drainage and design standards. RBF will include two reviews of the Hydrology and Drainage Study and two comment memorandums based on the review. Additional reviews could be accomplished on a Time and Materials basis. The EIR section will incorporate existing hydrology and drainage data for the project area to identify any existing localized drainage issues. The EIR section will incorporate a review of existing documentation, watershed boundary delineation, existing conditions analysis, analysis of proposed hydrology, analysis of proposed drainage facilities, and assessment/sizing of stormwater detention facilities, identify drainage patterns, storm drain improvements, and downstream affects. RBF will also evaluate water quality conditions and identify water quality techniques/structures that may be set forth by the County or State and Federal regulations. The potential forthe project to degrade water quality, interfere with groundwater recharge or expose people to water related hazards will be identified. F. Land Use and Planning RBF will evaluate the proposed project in consideration of on-site and surrounding land uses and will analyze the relationship of the project to applicable planning policies. These policies will be identified from the General Plan, Zoning Code, and other City standards. Existing land uses in the project area will be identified based on information compiled as a part of the EIR. Impacts to existing and potential future land uses in the project area will be assessed for both construction and operational phases. RBF will identify possible impact to nearby residences, businesses and other uses. P90 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 14 • February 19, 2008 i i ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services G. Noise RBF's Noise Specialists will prepare a Noise Study to evaluate project- related noise impacts specifically focusing on short-term construction impacts. The Noise Study will include the following which will be incorporated into the EIR: Existing Conditions. RBF will review applicable State and City noise and land use compatibility criteria for the project area. Noise standards regulating noise impacts in the noise standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be discussed for land uses on and adjacent to the project sites. RBF will conduct a site visit along the project sites and at adjacent land uses. During the site visit, RBF will conduct short-term noise level measurements along the project area. Noise monitoring equipment will consist of a Br0el & Kjaer model 2250 sound level meter (SLM) equipped with Bruel & Kj~r pre-polarized freefield microphone. The results of the noise measurements will be post-processed and graphically illustrated with the Bruel & Kj~r Noise Explorer software. The noise monitoring survey will be conducted at up to five separate locations to establish baseline noise levels in the project area. Noise recording lengths are anticipated to require approximately 10 minutes at each location: The noise measurements will evaluate noise exposure due to traffic while accounting for local topography, shielding from existing structures, and variations in travel speed. Construction-related Noise. Construction would occur during implementation of the proposed project. Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (Leq) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent sensitive locations. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area and the Noise Ordinance specifications of the City. RBF will provide a discussion of off-site truck hauling, if required, for construction-related soil import or export, focusing on haul routes affecting sensitive receptors. A technical discussion of construction activity-related vibration will be provided. The analysis will be based upon the guidance and thresholds issued by the Federal Transit Administration publication titled Transit Noise and Vibration Impacts Assessment, May 2006. This is the industry accepted methodology for assessing construction related vibration impacts. Aground-borne vibration level of 0.2 inch-per-second peak particle velocity (PPV) will be considered as damage threshold criterion for structures deemed "fragile," and aground-borne vibration level of 0.12 inch-per-second PPV will be considered as damage criterion for structures deemed "extremely fragile," such as historic buildings. With respect to structures that are considered "well engineered," a ground-borne vibration damage City of Rancho Cucamonga •15• February 19, 2008 P91 ~~ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project ~~ Environmental Services ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSIJ LTING threshold criterion of 2.0 inch-per-second PPV will be used. Note that this task excludes performing vibration measurements on-site. Stationary Noise Sources. Potential effects of existing off-site noise sources will be evaluated based on the City's land use compatibility standards. Compliance with applicable noise standards will be evaluated, with recommended mitigation measures included where appropriate. Transoortation Noise. The proposed project is anticipated to generate new vehicular traffic trips from future growth. On-site and off-site noise impacts from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the U.S. Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The analysis will focus on noise impacts associated with the development of the proposed project. Model i~ ~ input data will include average daily traffic volumes, day/night percentages of autos, medium and heavy trucks, vehicle speeds, ground attenuation factors, and roadway widths. The 24-hour weighted Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) will be presented in a tabular format. Traffic parameters necessary for the model input will be obtained from the traffic study. This scope assumes that architectural mitigation will not be developed (i.e., window glazing specifications, soundwall design, etc.). H. Transportation and Traffic RBF's Transportation and Traffic Specialists will prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to evaluate project-related traffic impacts. The TIA will be prepared in accordance with the Guidelines for CMP Traffic ImpactAnalysis Reports in San Bernardino County (Congestion Management Program for San Bernardino County, San Bernardino Associated Governments, November 2, 2005).The TIA will include the following which will be incorporated into the EIR: Studv Conditions: The traffic analysis will identify traffic impacts under the following scenarios: Existing Conditions; Forecast Near-Term Year Without Project Conditions; and Forecast Near-Term Year With Project Conditions. Congestion Management Program analysis scenarios are included to address potential long-range impacts consistent with San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) CMP traffic studies guidelines. Study Area: RBF will count and analyze up to twelve (12) study intersections during the a.m. peak period (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and the p.m. peak period (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday). Additionally, RBF will collect 24-hour roadway count data at up to eight (8) study roadway segments on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday). In accordance with SANBAG CMP guidelines the intersection count data will include vehicle classification information at six of the twelve study intersections. If additional counts are required beyond the number assumed, the counts can be performed on a Time and Materials basis. P92 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 16 • February 19, 2008 I r . ^ . CONSULTING i Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services RBF will visit the study area to document existing conditions including intersection control, traffic signal phasing, roadway cross-section, speed limits, parking restrictions, intersection approach lanes, etc. The traffic analysis will include graphics documenting the existing intersection roadway geometry, and the analysis will utilize existing conditions to establish a baseline for current operations. Forecast Near-Term Year Traffic Volumes: Forecast future opening year traffc volumes will be based on either specific cumulative projects traffic data supplied by the City, and/or by applying an annual traffic growth rate provided by the City to adjust existing traffic volumes to the designated future horizon year. RBF will derive trip distribution and assignment at up to ten (10) approved/pending projects identified by City Staff. Forecast near-term year with project volumes will be derived by adding the forecast project trip assignment to the forecast near-term year without project volumes. Proposed Proiect Trip Generation. Trip Distribution. & Assignment: The study will identify the number of daily and peak hour trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, using trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 71" Edition, 2003) or other source as directed by the City. RBF will perform 24-hour driveway count data at up to six (li) driveways at the existing winery site to identify existing trip generation displaced by the proposed project. Assumptions regarding projecttrip generation will be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to inclusion in the traffic study. The traffic study will provide a forecast distribution of project-generated trips. Manual trip distribution and assignment will be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to utilization in the study Level of Service: The forecast traffic impacts of the project during peak hours at the study intersections will be assessed. Operation of the study intersections will be documented to identify project-related traffic impacts using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology. Traffix software will be utilized for preparation of the level of service analysis. Mitigation measures will be recommended, as necessary, in accordance with applicable agency performance criteria. The TIA will document forecast operating conditions after application of any recommended mitigation measures. Traffic Signal Warrants: Traffic signal warrants will be prepared at up to two (2) unsignalized study intersections in accordance with the California MUTCD (FHWA MUTCD 2003 Revision 1) methodology. If applicable, existing conditions traffic signal warrants will be prepared using peak hour and daily traffic volume data for the applicable eight California MUTCD signal warrants, and future traffic signal warrants will be prepared using P93 City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 • February 19, 2008 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING estimated average daily traffic applied to the California MUTCD Table 4C.103(CA). State Highway Analvsis: The State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide forthe Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies guide requires review of substantial individual projects, which might on their own impact the State Highway transportation system. RBF assumes the project trip generation and distribution does not exceed Caltrans-established trip volume thresholds. Therefore, no State Highway analysis is included in this scope of work. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Prooram Analvsis: The purpose of the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) is to develop a coordinated approach to managing and decreasing traffic congestion by linking the various transportation, land use and air quality planning programs throughout the County. The program is consistent with that of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The CMP requires review of substantial individual projects, which might on their own impact the CMP transportation system. When accounting for passenger car equivalents, the proposed industrial project is forecast to generate in excess of 250 two-way a.m. peak hour trips and in excess of 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips. Therefore, preparation of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is required for the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. This scope of work assumes the CMP analysis study area will include up to six (6) CMP intersections to satisfy the San Bernardino CMP. RBF will work with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and SANBAG staff to post-process currently available traffic model run data for forecast year 2025 conditions. Since the SANBAG traffic model does not generate peak hour intersection movement data at the study intersections, RBF will post-process the year 2025 mid-block peak period traffic volumes to derive a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at up to six (6) study intersections for forecast year 2030 without project conditions in accordance with SANBAG- established criteria correlated to existing intersection approach traffic volumes, including pro-ration of incremental traffic growth to derive forecast year 2030 volumes from SAN BAG provided year 2025 volumes. This scope of work does not assume costs associated with running new model runs. The CMP analysis will document existing operation of the study intersections, and determine future opening year and year 2030 operation of the study facilities both with and without the proposed project to identify project-related traffic impacts using the HCM analysis methodology. Mitigation measures will be recommended, as necessary, in accordance with San Bernardino County CMP performance criteria. P94 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 18 • February 19, 2008 ^ . CONSULTING P95 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 1. Public Services and Utilities RBF will contact potentially affected agencies to identify relevant existing conditions, project impacts, and recommended mitigation measures. The discussion will focus on the potential alteration of existing facilities, extension or expansion of new facilities, and the increased demand on services based on the proposed land uses. RBF will evaluate the ability of the project area to receive adequate service based on City and applicable County standards and, where adequate services are not available, will identify the effects of inadequate service and recommended mitigation measures. f L. 3.3.7 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT RBF will provide a qualitative explanation of issues found not to be significant in the Initial Study, and which were not discussed in detail in the EIR. The Initial Study will be provided as an attachment to the EIR for the reader's reference. 3.3.8 GROVYTH INDUCEMENT RBF will provide a project specific analysis update of potential growth-inducing impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(g). The analysis in this section was based. on data from the City of Rancho Cucamogna, California Department of Finance, and U.S. Census. This section will discuss ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. The analysis addresses growth-inducing impacts in terms of whether the project influences the rate, location, and the amount of growth. Growth-inducing impacts are assessed based on the project's consistency with adopted/proposed plans that have addressed growth management from a local and regional standpoint. Potential growth-inducing impacts from the proposed development will be analyzed as they relate to population, housing and employment factors. 3.3.9 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130, RBF will discuss cumulative impacts for each environmental issue area identified above, focusing on cumulative impacts and levels of severity in the project area at a quantitative and qualitative level. The analysis will include potential future development in the project area. The analysis will focus upon cumulative impacts from recently approved and/or pending projects in proximity (cumulative project information to be provided as stated in Task 3.1.5). 3.3.10 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, RBF will provide an analysis of a "reasonable range" of alternatives (for budgeting purposes, RBF assumes four City of Rancho Cucamonga •19• February 19, 2008 r i ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services • One (1) electronic copy of the Draft EIR and Appendices 3.7.4 FINAL EIR • Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments One (1) electronic copy of the Response to Comments Five (5) copies of the Screencheck Final EIR • Five (5) CD version of Screencheck Final EIR Technical Appendices • Forty (40) copies of the Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical Appendices Forty (40) CD version of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices • One (1) unbound camera-ready original of the Final EIR, Exhibits and Technical Appendices One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical Appendices Five (5) copies of the Draft Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations • One (1) camera-ready Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations • One (1) electronic copy of the Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations One (1) camera-ready Notice of Determination • One (1) camera-ready Notice of Completion City of Rancho Cucamonga •24• February 19, 2008 P96 r' i ^ ^ ^ ^ CC NSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 111. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE The following is a preliminary outline of the Project schedule. A date specific schedule will follow the kickoff to the work program. Project Kickoff Day 1 i' Project Description and Background Information Week 1 Preparation of the Initial Study Weeks 2-4 (~ ALTERNATIVE 1 -PREPARATION OF AN MND ' Preparation of Technical Reports Weeks 5-8 Screencheck Draft MND preparation Weeks 5-10 Review of Screencheck Draft MND i Week 10-11 Complete, Publish, Circulate Draft MND Week 12 30-Day Public Review Period Weeks 13-16 '; RBF prepares the Final MND' Weeks 17-20 Review of Final MND Weeks 21-22 i Complete, Publish, Circulate Final MND Week 23 Public Hearing TBD ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR Preparation of Technical Reports Weeks 5-12 30-Day NOP Review Weeks 5-8 Screencheck Draft EIR preparation Weeks 5-15 Review of Screencheck Draft EIR Weeks 16-17 RBF Prepares Preliminary Draft EIR Weeks 18-19 Review of Preliminary Draft EIR Weeks 20-21 Complete, Publish, Circulate Draft EIR Week 22 45-Day Public Review Period Weeks 23-28 RBF Prepares Final EIRZ Weeks 28-31 Review of Final EIR Weeks 32-33 Complete, Publish, Circulate Final EIR Week 34 Certification Hearings TBD i ~ The Response to Comments and the Mitigation Monitoring Program compose fhe Final MND ~ The Response to Comments, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations compose the Final EIR. P97 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 25 • February 19, 2008 i. ~- ^ ^ ^ ^ CO NSLl LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services IV. SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS RBF Consulting is amulti-disciplinary planning, engineering and surveying firm with a total staff of over 1,000 professionals, with offices in Contra Costa, Marin, Santa Clara, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Los Angeles, and San Diego counties. With over 60 years of public and private sector experience, RBF is respected and recognized in the profession of consulting planning, environmental, and engineering services throughout the state of California. RBF has in- house expertise in disciplines including Environmental Analysis, Planning, GIS Services, Surveying, Aerial Photogrammetry, Mapping, Real Estate Assessments, Transportation/Traffc Engineering, Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public Works, Water/Wastewater, Hydrology), Mechanical/ Electrical/Energy Services, Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) and Media Services. Over 90 professionals are dedicated to Planning, Environmental Services and Landscape Architecture. RBF possesses the full range of disciplines necessary to provide turn-key planning, design and implementation of a wide range of projects. We combine our expertise in development projects and urban planning, transportation and air quality management, to develop and assess project designs that minimize impacts to the natural environment and community. The following is a comprehensive list of RBF departments and services: DEPARTMENTS AREAS OF EXPERTISE Land Planning and Urban Conceptual Design; Master Planning; Site Planning; Hillside Design: Grading; Landscape Architecture; Redevelopment and tnfill Land Use Planning; Illustrative Plans; Pedestrian and Vehicular Trail Studies; Visual Analysis; Design Guidelines and Development Standards. Policy Planning: Specific Plans, General Plans; Community Participation Programs; Project Management and Coordination; Feasibility/Special Studies; Fee Programs; Entitlement to Use (including zone changes, General Plan Amendments and annexation studies); Redevelopment Studies; Consultant Coordination; Governmental Agencies/Public Liaison; and Development Support Services through Construction. Environmental Services: Environmental Impact Reports/Statements; Expanded Initial Studies/Negative Declarations; Mitigation Monitoring Programs; Public Participation Programs; Natural Resource Management; Resource Mitigation Permits; EIR and EIS Review; Noticing; Statements of Overriding Considerations; Findings; and Special Studies, such as Phase I Site Assessment for hazardous materials, as well as noise and air quality monitoring and modeling. Transportation Planning: Master Plans of Circulation; Transportation Planning/Engineering; Traffic Impact Studies; Traffic Control Plans; Traffic Signal Coordination; Traffic Signal Design; Congestion Management Programs; Street Lighting; Signing, Striping, and Construction Detour Plans. City of Rancho Cucamonga • 26 • February 19, 2008 P98 ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services Media Services: Report Graphics; Presentation Graphics; View Analysis; Illustrations; Slide Shows; Video Services; and CADD Illustrative Plans. Civil Engineering: Subdivision Engineering; Structural Engineering; Engineering Design; and CADD mapping. Mechanical/Electrical Commercial Office Buildings; Retail Shopping Center; Educational Engineering: Facilities; Hotel/Motel; Industrial; Special Energy Systems; Entertainment Performing Arts Centers; and Computer Centers. -. RBF has experienced professionals in a wide range of planning, engineering and related ' disciplines. With over 60 years of experience throughout California, our staff is actively involved in I professional and local issues through serving as local and state officers for various professional organizations. We provide a full range of engineering and planning services, with particular expertise in the planning, design and permitting of major commercial/industrial and mixed use projects. Our staff includes: • 34 American Institute of Certified Planners • 6 Registered Environmental Assessors • 2 Certified Environmental Inspectors • 1 EPA -Certified Building Inspector and Management Planner for Asbestos • 1 Registered GeologisUCertified Engineering Geologist • S Licensed Landscape Architects • UCI Certificate in Environmental Site Assessment and Remediation/40 hour OSHATreining • Instructors in the areas of Energy Efficiency, Environmental Engineering and Water Resources • Over 300 Registered Civil, Traffic, Structural and Mechanical Engineers ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES As a leader in the environmental field, RBF offers an extensive array of services associated with environmental compliance and documentation. RBF provides evaluation for the full range of environmental effects for all types of projects. Our award-winning team offers documentation in compliance with environmental laws and regulations including CEQA, NEPA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and other applicable environmental laws. Environmental documents prepared at RBF address the full range of environmental and technical issues, with in-house specialists providing technical evaluation for traffic and transportation, flood control and drainage, air quality, noise, land use, socioeconomics, utilities and services, energy conservation, visual and aesthetic effects, relevant planning, Phase I hazardous materials, neighborhood and construction effects, landform modification, agricultural suitability and many other environmental issue areas. RBF draws upon the profession's leading subconsultants for specialized biological, archeological, geotechnical and fiscal/economic studies to build amulti- disciplinaryteam ofenvironmental analysts. State-of-the-art computer facilities including Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD), ARC/INFO, and specially created computer programs are utilized in obtaining the highest level of technical completeness and efficiency. P99 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 27 • February 19, 2008 r^ i ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services SUMMARY OF KEY PROJECT EXPERIENCE This section includes a summary of RBF's background involving similar projects. We have also included a listing of additional projects for consideration. Carrari Ranch Project EIR City of Rancho Cucamonga I RBF is preparing an EIR for the Carrari Ranch Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The ._ project site is located at the foot of the San Bernardino Mountains along the San Bernardino National Forest. The Carrari Ranch Project requires the annexation of the project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga (and other affected agencies) and pre-zoning of the properties within the annexation areas as Hillside Residential and Open Space. Additionally, the project involves development of 110 residential units on 74 acres of the site while a remaining 596 acres would remain undeveloped. The EIR analyzes numerous key issues including water and sewer service, fire service, roadways and circulation, and public safety. Pacific Trade Project Focused EIR City of EI Monte RBF Consulting is preparing a Focused EIR for the Pacific Trade Project located within the San Gabriel Valley. The approximately 27-acre site is located within the northwestern portion of the City of EI Monte's limits. The project proposes to develop the 27-acre site into commercial and industrial uses. The project would require the subdivision of the site into three private parcel and one public parcels. The private parcels would be utilized for commercial and industrial development while the public parcel would be utilized as a public roadway to provide access to the site. The private parcels would have commercial condominiums, subterranean parking, a warehouse, office space, and show rooms. Key environmental issues include air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, traffic and circulation, hydrology, and land use. The Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR City of Upland RBF prepared an EIR for the Amendment to the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan. The project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Upland, near the Upland -Rancho Cucamonga city boundaries, and is bisected by the new Interstate 210 freeway. The project includes 1150 residential dwelling units, 115 acres of commercial uses, a school site, fire station site and natural open space areas. The EIR analyzes the comprehensive amendment to the approximately 450-acre Specific Plan area. Key issues evaluated include: land use and relevant planning; aesthetics/light and glare; traffic and circulation; air quality; noise; biological resources; geology and soils; hydrology and drainage; and public services and utilities. Rialto Airport Specific Plan/EIR City of Rialto RBF prepared a Specific Plan and EIR for 3,131 acres surrounding the Rialto Municipal Airport. The goal of this City-sponsored project is to improve economic vitality, the area's visual image, and in general, enhance development of the area. With over 650 property owners (including a variety of municipal agencies), an extensive public communication program was necessitated; this program P100 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 28 • February 19, 2008 r^ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ~, CONSLJ LTING ~- including property owner workshops, an advisory committee, and newsletters. Issues focused on the proposed SR-30 Freeway and the economic benefits associated with a regional freeway ' commercial corridor; an existing, operating landfill which is planning an expansion (impacting Airport airspace); as well as issues related to the Airport (i.e., safety, noise, etc.). Proposed uses i include commercial, commercial recreation, a variety of industrial uses, as well as a potential community college. Cypress Business Park Environmental Review City of Cypress For more than a decade, RBF Consulting has been preparing environmental documents for individual development projects within the 587-acre Cypress Business Park, which encompasses six specific plan areas: Cypress Business and Professional Center, Cypress Corporate Center, Cypress View Limited, McDonnell Center, Worland/Cypress Business Center, and Lusk Company Industrial Park. A range of business park-related land uses are allowed within the specific plan areas including commercial, office, research and development, business park, light industrial, manufacturing, warehouse, hotel, and golf course uses within the past four years. RBF Consulting has prepared Mitigated Negative Declarations for the projects listed below. • Ushio America -Walker Facility: a 72,427 square foot office/warehouse building on a 4.0- acre site. • Marriott Residence Inn: a 155-room hotel on a 3.7-acre site. • SHURflo Project: athree-building campus for SHURflo, including a 50,000 square foot office building, a 91,618 square foot research and development building, and a 100,000 square foot warehouse building on a 12.2-acre site. • West Orangewood Water Well Project: a 1,000 foot deep waterwell and pumping facility on a 3,500-square foot site. • 6161 Chip Avenue: a 50,000 square foot speculative office/research and development building on a 2.9-acre site. • Vertex Standard: a 95,800 square foot office/warehouse building on a 6.0-acre site. • 5730 Katella Avenue: a 62,700 square foot speculative research and development building on a 4.3-acre site. • Cypress Corporate Park: four speculative office/manufacturing/warehouse buildings totaling 208,271 square feet on a 10.83-acre site. Vineyard Center Specific Plan Final EIR City of Ontario RBF prepared the Final EIR for the Vineyard Center Specific Plan which addressed three alternative land use schemes. Schemes A and B, proposed by the applicant, consisted of a mixture of commercial/retail, warehouse retail, hotel, commercial/office and industrial land uses. Scheme C was developed by the City of Ontario to address a "retail only" Alternative eliminating the hotel, industrial and warehouse retail land uses. Primary issues of concern addressed within the document include: • Circulation and traffic at several intersections would operate at LOS D or worse with project implementation; • Compatibility of the proposed planned commercial uses with surrounding existing uses; • Wind and water erosion during construction; P101 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 29 • February 19, 2008 ~ .. ~~ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING ~- Hydrology and drainage (including analysis for on-site detention basins); • Views associated with replacing existing undeveloped area with planned commercial uses; and • Noise on the surrounding street system from project-related traffic. Yucaipa Valley Acres Final EIR (Chapman Heights Final Supplemental EIR) County of San Bernardino/City of Yucaipa RBF was hired by the County of San Bernardino to prepare a Final EIR analyzing the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed 1,012-acre, 3,847-unit planned development located in the City of Yucaipa at the base of Grafton Hills, approximately four miles east of the City of Redlands. RBF hydrologists were consulted to analyze stormflows relative to the portions of the project that are located within a floodway. The recommendations of RBF's hydrologists included a system of proposed improvements to reduce flood hazards both on and off the project site. Other features of the plan requiring special technical analysis involved maintaining safe yields for project water supplies, impacts on anon-site water reclamation facility, and management of traffic impacts. RBF also prepared the Final Supplemental EIR for the revised project, referred to as the Chapman Heights Planned Development. The project at that time was within the jurisdiction of the City of Yucaipa. Ontario Gateway Plaza Specific Plan EIR City of Ontario RBF prepared the EIR for the Ontario Gateway Plaza Specific Plan site, located on 57.3 acres in the City of Ontario in southwestern San Bernardino County. The Specific Plan proposed a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to accommodate development of 1,097,100 square feet of commercial office and retail floor area. The EIR addressed contained extensive analysis of several environmental issues, including: Traffic and circulation impacts due to the project's location on the northwestern corner of the San Bernardino Freeway (I-10) and the Devore Freeway (I-15); • Land use consistency with surrounding uses and existing on-site uses; and The project's effect on the regional jobs and housing balance. North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transit Village Plan EIR/EA City of Lancaster RBF prepared an EIR/EA fora 103-acre area in the Lancaster North Downtown area. The proposed project represents the City's long-term program to retain and revitalize the historic downtown area. The Plan was formulated with the involvement of various Stakeholders in the area. The plan creates a framework to achieve the overall objectives of expanding and locating new institutional uses in the area, providing adequate locations for various service providers, rehabilitating or replacing deteriorated housing stock, providing recreational facilities and enhancing commercial uses. The RBF team has provided comprehensive services for the project which includes public participation, vision plan, design guidelines and standards, infrastructure studies and required General Plan Amendments/Zone Changes. The environmental review has involved traffic, historical resources, air, noise and hazardous materials. P102 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 30 • February 19, 2008 r~ ' Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services i" ', ^ ^ ^ i CONSLI LTING -~ EI Centro de Huntington Park City of Huntington Park ~.- RBF was called in by the Community Development Commission of the City of Huntington Park to ' quickly prepare a Draft EIR in five weeks to meet the City's aggressive schedule. The project I proposes to redevelop the approximately 29-acre site from industrial uses to commercial uses. Implementation of the proposed project will require the purchase and demolition of portions of j approximately 50 parcels, and demolition of 595,000 square feet of existing buildings. In total, the I new commercial development consists of approximately 490,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. Project highlights include: Big-Box Retail Replacing Aging Industrial Uses; Compressed EIR Production Time Frame; Urban Decay Study; and RBF Technical Studies for Traffic, Air Quality, ~ Noise, Hydrology, Water and Sewer. Dominguez Hills Village Specific Plan EIR City of Carson RBF prepared the EIR for redevelopment of this Brea Canyon Oil Property. The project site has been an oil producing and storage facility since the 1920s and also includes the Deepwater Iodides facility, which has been remediated and removed. The 99.4-acre Specific Plan project proposed 992 residential units, a 50,000-square foot neighborhood retail center, child care facility, relocation of oil production facilities, 355,000 square feet of light industrial uses, and a tank farm. As a related project addressed within this EIR, City staff has developed aCity-wide Oil Well Ordinance that would allow existing oil wells in residential and commercial areas to continue operating with a Conditional Use Permit, including provision of submersed well heads, landscaping and noise control. Primary issues addressed in the EIR include site remediation, land use compatibility, traffic, noise, air quality, and potential school district formation. Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plans Master EIR City of Long Beach RBF is currently preparing a Master EIR for 10non-contiguous areas located within Downtown and Central Long Beach. The project area is part of two redevelopment project areas: The Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed project involves removal of existing uses for development of new uses, adaptive reuse of existing uses and development of new uses on vacant land. In addition, the work program has included development of design concepts for four of the sites. The project proposes development of residential, retail, mixed-use residential/retail and/or office uses, an Art Exchange, live/work units and parking uses to assist in realizing the objectives and actions identified in the Downtown Long Beach Strategic Action Plan and Strategic Guide for Development for the Central StudyArea. The environmental review will involve aesthetics/light and glare, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, historic resources, public services and utilities, a water supply study in accordance with SB 610, and hazardous materials assessments. City of Santa Monica Environmental Studies City of Santa Monica RBF has prepared numerous EIRs and Initial Studies/Negative Declarations for projects located within the City of Santa Monica. Key environmental issues addressed in these documents included land use compatibility (primarily visual and noise related), traffic, and glare/shadows. These P103 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 31 February 19, 2008 ,-~ Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services r- ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING r- projects include: The Ravello Mixed Use Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement (commercial/retail uses, office and four apartment units); Pacific Garden Senior Group Housing Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The 2020 Santa Monica Boulevard ~_, Parking Structure Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The Third Street Mall and - Downtown Assessment District Improvement Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The Addendum to the Final Initial Study for the Proposed Senior Housing Project at 1121-1135 Third Street; The 100 Broadway Mixed Use Development Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The Criterion Theatre Complex Initial Study and Neighborhood I Impact Statement; The 1250 Fourth Street Mixed Use Office/Retail Building EIR; The Mixed-Use Office, Retail Project at401-415 Santa Monica Boulevard/1341-1347 Fourth Street EIR; The Ocean ' Avenue Condominiums Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; Plaza Promenade,1343- 1349 Third Street Environmental Impact Report; and the Upward Bound EIR (Senior Housing and Transitional Housing). PROJECT EXPERIENCE SUMMARY ' The following is a summary of project background experience on environmental review projects: i Land Development Projects Buena Vista/Kern River Ranch Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA Colonies at San Antonio EIR -Upland, CA Fagan Canyon Specific Plan Program EIR -Santa Paula, CA Gosford-Panama Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA Grand Canal EIR -Bakersfield, CA Hi Hope Ranch MND -Oceanside, CA Lancaster Capital, LLC Tentative Tract 53229 -Lancaster, CA Lyons Canyon Ranch Specific Plan EIR -Santa Clarita, CA Moffett Towers Corporate Campus -Sunnyvale, CA Oasis Road Specific Plan Master EIR -Redding, CA Rio Bravo Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA Robinson Ranch North EIR -Yucaipa, CA Shoppes at Chino Hills EIR -Chino Hills, CA Soledad Village EIR -Santa Clarita, CA St. Cloud Tentative Tract Map MND -Oceanside, CA University Village and Orchard Park Specific Plans EIR -Loma Linda, CA Village of Del Lago at Quintana -Thermal, CA Redevelopment/Brownfield Projects Beverly Wilshire Office Building EIR -Beverly Hills, CA Clearwater Specific Plan EIR -Mammoth Lakes, CA Fair Isaac Redevelopment Project -San Rafael, CA Garvey Villas IS/MND -Monterey Park, CA Gateway Plaza -Santa Cruz, CA Montage Project EIR -Beverly Hills, CA North Downtown Lancaster Transit Village EIR/EA -Lancaster, CA Redlands Mall Redevelopment Project EIR -Redlands, CA San Gabriel Center EIR -San Gabriel, CA P104 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 32 • February 19, 2008 ^ . CCNStJ LTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project P105 Environmental Services Shoreline Gateway EIR -Long Beach, CA Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan EIR -Huntington Beach, CA Uptown Orange Mixed Use Project MND -Orange, CA Industrial/Commercial Projects Blue Rock Business Center EIR -Antioch, CA Boeing Specific Plan EIR -Seal Beach, CA Broadway Plaza Shopping Center Technical Studies -Chula Vista, CA CA Army National Guard Maintenance Facility EA -Riverside, CA EI Centro de Huntington Park EIR -Huntington Park, CA Eldorado National Forest Telecommunications Project EA - EI Dorado National Forest, CA Firestone Mastercare Center Technical Studies -Chino Hills, CA Mariner's Mile Gateway Project MND -Newport Beach, CA National City Costco Technical Studies -National City, CA Pine Corporate Center Technical Studies -Chino Hills, CA Super Wal-Mart Commercial Center EIR -Rialto, CA Tyler Mall EIR Addendum -Riverside, CA Vitner Square Shopping Center EIR -Lodi, CA Policy Planning Studies City of Angels Camp General Plan Update Studies -Angels Camp, CA City of Carson General Plan Update and EIR -Carson, CA City of Cerritos General Plan Update and EIR -Cerritos, CA City of Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR -Costa Mesa, CA City of Cypress General Plan Update and EIR -Cypress, CA City of Glendora General Plan Update and EIR -Glendora, CA City of Lancaster General Plan Update -Lancaster, CA City of Stanton General Plan Update and EIR -Stanton, CA Dana Point Town Center IS/MND -Dana Point, CA Downtown Sierra Madre Specific Plan EIR-Sierra Madre, CA Palmdale Transit Village Specific Plan EIR -Palmdale, CA Route 66 Specific Plan EIR -Glendora, CA Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update and EIR -Los Gatos, CA Watsonville General Plan Update EIR -Watsonville, CA ResortslRecreation Anaverde Basin/Sports Complex EIR -Palmdale, CA Berryessa Creek Trail Reach 3 MND/CE -Milpitas, CA Cypress Skate Park Technical Studies -Cypress, CA Gilroy Golf Course EIR -Gilroy, CA Hotel del Coronado Master Plan EIR -Coronado, CA Loch Lomond Marina -San Rafael, CA Long Point Resort EIR -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA McKean Sportsfield Complex EIR -San Jose, CA North Village Specific Plan EIR -Mammoth Lakes, CA Santa Cruz Coast Hotel EIR -Santa Cruz, CA Santa Rosa Creek Trail IS/MND -Cambria CSD, CA ~- City of Rancho Cucamonga • 33 • February 19, 2008 l! r~ ' PROJECT NIGNLIGNTS ^ Prepared a Subsequent Program (' EIR for 1,156-acre expansion of I the San Sevaine Redevelopment on an accelerated project schedule ^ Completed project on time and within budget I, ~~ i_.. San Sevaine Amended Redevelopment Plan Subsequent Program EIR San Bernardino County, CA RBF Consulting (RBF) was retained by the San Bernardino County Redevelopment Agency to prepare aerogram-level EIR for an amendment to the San Sevaine Redevelopment Plan. The proposed amendment sought to expand the existing redevelopment plan area, which is located west of Fontana and east of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, by 1,156 acres. Included in the amended redevelopment plan was a description of future capita] improvement projects the Redevelopment Agency planned to implement under the plan. RBF was able to minimize the cost of the EIR by relying on the existing planning documents and technical studies supplied by the Redevelopment Agency. This allowed for the EIR to be submitted on time and within budget in accordance with the accelerated project schedule. The Draft EIR was submitted in June 2004 and the Final EIR was submitted in September 2004. The San Bernardino County Planning Commission and the San Bernardino CounTy Board of Supervisors ultimately approved the EIR and redevelopment plan amendment without any legal or political opposition. ~ t ,..,.. - - ~ - _- - ~ r ~- M ... = - _ .~-. ~= _- - , -, ~; ~ i ` ~ ~~ ;._ . -- " q - ~ - - - ~ -- - -- ~ - - - i L ~.~~;. - - - ~ ~~ F F Y L ~ ~ _ 3 F f i tagontl ReEevelagmeM Area - MM0 Npe Epelrq ~Y1ovLLV, - Slmo Gib s,,.. u ~ ona-nrzsms L ^ Streamlined process by relying on existing planning documents and technical studies ^ Subsequent Program EIR and Amended Redevelopment Plan approved without any opposition Reference: Rosenow Spevacek Group 309 West 4th Street Santa Ana, CA 92701-4502 Ms. Felise Acosta, 714/541-4585 06 PROJECT NIGNLIGHTS 70~ ^ Neo-Traditional Land Design Rich Haven Mixed-Use Specific Plan Ontario, CA ^ Mixed-Use Regional Commercial Center RBF Consulting (RBF) was selected by Richland Communities and ^ variety of Housing Types Watt Genton Associates to prepare a Specific Plan for the Rich- Haven Development. The 510.6-acre parcel is part of a larger parcel ^ Pedestrian Paseo System annexed into the City of Ontario in 1998, and subject to the New Model Colony (NMC) General Plan Amendment (GPA) design ^ Trip Budget Density guidelines adopted in 1998. Transfer Mechanisms ^ Part of the Greater NMC GPA The objective of this specific plan is to develop a cohesive and self- sustaining community consisting of well integrated neighborhoods ^ Utility Corridor Constraints with residential, regional commercial, and community facility land uses. RBF prepared specific development standards, design guidelines, and a land use plan to fit within the vision and framework Reference: of the NMC. The specific plan will be used as an implementation tool Richland Communities to augment the NMC GPA for future development in the plan area. 4100 Newport Place In order to comply with the vision and objectives of the NMC GPA, Suite 800 this plan incorporates a mixture of uses with a unique identity, Newport Beach, CA 92660 incorporating "live, work, and play" opportunities and a series of Mr. Jim Powers, 949/261-7010 connecting trails, sidewalks, and transit stops to encourage pedestrian and bicycle mobility. "Main Street" commercial/retail, civic, and cultural uses, provide a central focus for the community. Public spaces, such as small parks and plazas, have been designed to create synergy between adjacent land uses. ~ --- °".~- ~~~ ,W i, ~r~uno us[F~r~,~n W I2] - L]A/U] caN CUViNo ._ . 1. ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING V. PROJECT TEAM Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services The following are brief background descriptions for the key professionals who would be responsible for preparing the EIR. The percentage of hours of each staff member and individual tasks are included in the Fee Summary. Glenn Lajoie, AICP Project Assignment: Project Director Mr. Lajoie is the Environmental Planning Manager and oversees a team of 22 professionals in Irvine. Mr. Lajoie's primary responsibilities include oversight of daily operations, management of projects, staff mentoring and instruction, scheduling, and business development. With 20 years of practical experience, Mr. Lajoie is a recognized leader in CEQA and NEPA studies (EIR's, EIS's, Negative Declarations, Environmental Assessments), as well as other policy planning documents, including General Plans, Area Plans, Specific Plans, and due diligence studies. Projects have ranged from private entitlement applications related to residential and commercial projects as well as a variety of water, wastewater, highway, and redevelopment projects throughout California. Project responsibilities include analysis, technical review and management of environmental and policy planning documentation for compliance with CEQA/NEPA, implementation of public participation programs, and assistance to various public and private sector clients in meeting the requirements of local, State, and Federal agencies. Relevant project management experience includes the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Upland, North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization(Transit Village Plan and EIR/EA; the Long Point Coastal Development Plan EIR in Rancho Palos Verdes; the Hotel del Coronado Specific Plan EIR in Coronado; the Cambria Desalination Facility EIR; the Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR; the North Village Specific Plan Program EIR in Mammoth Lakes; the Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR in Rancho Palos Verdes; the Grand Canal Entertainment Center EIR in Bakersfield; and the Escondido Performing Arts and Justice Center EIR in Escondido. Mr. Lajoie also oversees on-call environmental services assignments in Long Beach, Santa Ana, Westminster and in Cambria. Mr. Lajoie is the Project Manager for a current EIR in Long Beach involving projects within the Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plan areas and recently served as Project Director for the Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel EIR and the Shoreline Gateway EIR in Long Beach. Mr. Lajoie is also currently serving as Project Director for the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in Rancho Cucamonga. Alan Ashimine Project Assignment: Project Manager Mr. Ashimine, as a Project Manager with the Environmental Planning group, oversees and prepares environmental studies for public and private sectors clients, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Mr. Ashimine draws on his broad background and understanding of environmental constraints to provide technical and CEQA compliance review and environmental documentation, in addition to research, analysis, and writing. Mr. Ashimine has either managed or coordinated a wide range of environmental planning projects, including environmental documents for major infill and redevelopment projects, land development projects, highly controversial hillside developments, and water resources infrastructure, among others. Mr. Ashimine is currently serving as Project Manager for the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in P108 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 36 • February 19, 2008 ~, Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services i... CONSULTING r~ Rancho Cucamonga. Relevant project experience includes the Pacific Trade Focused EIR in EI Monte, the Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan EIR in Huntington Beach, Southern California Logistics Airport Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Victorville, and the Old Town Yucca Valley • Specific Plan EIR in Yucca Valley. Michelle Dunn Project Assignment: Environmental Analyst ' Ms. Dunn prepares environmental compliance studies under CEQA for both public and private sector clients. Ms. Dunn's experience includes residential, infrastructure, coastal, and industrial projects, among others. Through her experience in analysis, research, and writing of environmental impact documentation, Ms. Dunn provides comprehensive services to assist Clients in project compliance review. Ms. Dunn's project experience includes the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in i ' Rancho Cucamonga, the Parking Lots Project EIR in San Fernando, the 601 North Park Center Drive IS/MND in Santa Ana, the North Beverly Drive Project EIR in Beverly Hills, the North Village Specific Plan EIR for the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Seawater Desalination Project EIR at ( Huntington Beach, Regional Seawater Desalination Project at Encina EIR in Carlsbad, the City of Artesia General Plan Update, the City of Glendora General Plan Update, the Clearwater Specific Plan EIR in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Downtown Revitalization Project EIR for South Pasadena, the San Fernando Parking Lots Projects EIR in San Fernando, the Sherwin Project EIR in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, and several other projects involving complex hazardous materials, air quality, noise, residential, and traffic issues. Eddie Torres, INCE Project Assignment: Air Quality Study and Acoustical Study Mr. Torres received two BAs from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) in Environmental Analysis and Design and Mechanical Engineering and most recently a MS at the University of Southern California (USC) for Mechanical Engineering. As a Project Manager/Environmental Analyst at RBF, Mr. Torres prepares Environmental and Planning Studies for public and private sector clients under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Mr. Torres has extensive experience in the research, analysis, and writing of CEQA documentation for a variety of projects involving infrastructure, redevelopment, residential, commercial, mixed-use, and industrial uses. Utilizing his broad background and understanding of environmental constraints. Mr. Torres provides technical and CEQA compliance review and environmental documentation including EIR's and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declarations. Mr. Torres also has experience with noise monitoring using Type I rated instruments, as well as sophisticated noise modeling using FHWA-RD-77-108 and Traffic Noise Model 2.5. Mr. Torres also can provide full-range noise measurement spectragraphs utilizing the Larson Davis and BrOel & Kjaer Data Noise Analysis software. Additionally, his expertise in Air Quality Assessment includes technical modeling experience using various CARB and EPA approved programs. He has been involved with a wide range of public and private developments within the State of California, with work in several air districts from the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD). Bob Matson Project Assignment: Transportation Study Bob Matson has many years of diverse traffic and transportation experience in preparing a wide range of traffic studies and transportation planning analyses. Mr. Matson and his staff generate a P109 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 37 • February 19, 2008 r° ,r ^ . i CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services variety of traffic/transportation studies to analyze and document projects at various stages of development, such as conceptual planning, preliminary engineering, agency general plan/zoning modifications, environmental documentation, projecUinfrastructureyhasing, site plans, tract maps, final engineering, construction traffic management plans, and parking studies. His expertise allows him to work effectively with local, state and private sectors. Mr. Matson's experience includes preparing traffic study's for the Carrari Ranch Project in Rancho Cucamonga, the Etiwanda Marketplace Project in Rancho Cucamonga, the Redlands Village Town Center Project in Redlands, Moreno Valley Mall Project in Moreno Valley, the Southern Califomia Logistics Airport in Victorville, the Laguna Beach Downtown Traffic Impact Analysis in Laguna Beach, the Mariner's Mile Gateway in Newport Beach, and the Carson Marketplace Onsite Circulation Analysis in Carson. Richard Beck, REA Project Assignment: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Study Mr. Beck assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies for public and private sector clients, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. As the Regulatory Coordinator at RBF, Mr. Beck is involved with regulatory permit processing pursuant to Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. Included in this area of study, Mr. Beck also conducts jurisdictional delineations and acts as a liaison between public and private sector clients and State and Federal regulatory agencies. In addition to ' regulatory issues, Mr. Beck prepares Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and Environmental i Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy. Mr. Beck also assists in the preparation of documents with respect to CEQA and NEPA. Rebecca Kinney, P.E. Project Assignment: Hydrology and Drainage Peer Review Ms. Kinney has many years of experience in all phases of stormwater management projects including planning, design, and construction. Her recent experience has focused on development of Master Plans of Drainage, which focus on hydrology, storm drainage facility sizing, stormwater NPDES compliance, stream stability, and floodplain management. Ms. Kinney also has experience in floodplain management, including revisions to development codes. She is also experienced in channel restoration design work, including hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and PS&E work. Ms. Kinney has served as a regulatory agent for permit applications 404 (ACOE), 401 (California Regional Water Quality Control Board), and 1601/1603 (California of Department of Fish and Game). She received wetland delineation training by the Wetland Training Institute. Her knowledge of both engineering and environmental requirements makes her an asset to any multidisciplinary team. P110 City of Rancho Cucamonga • 38 • February 19, 2008 I_. f -, i i' ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services ORGANIZATIONAL CHART City of Rancho Cucamonga Glenn Lajoie, AICP Project Director I Alan Ashimine Project Manager '! i i i Michelle Dunn Environmental Analyst Eddie Torres, INCE Air Quality Study and Acoustical Study Richard Beck, REA Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment Bob Matson Traffic Impact Analysis Rebecca Kinney, P.E. Hydrology and Drainage Peer Review City of Rancho Cucamonga •39• February 19, 2008 P111 ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services VI. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS This proposal shall be valid for a period of 90 days. Progress billings will be forwarded based on payment criteria established by the City. These billings will include the fees earned for the billing period. The City shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. The fees proposed herein shall apply until March 1, 2009. Due to annual increases in costs associated with inflation, staff wage increases and increases in direct costs, Consultant will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after March 1, 2009, by fifteen percent (15%). Deviations or modifications from the Scope of Work will result in potential re-evaluation of the associated fees. Items not soecifically stated in the proposal will be considered an additional work item. ' All work will be performed at a "Not to Exceed" contract price, which will become the fixed price upon completion of negotiations with the City staff authorized to negotiate and agreement. The total budget includes all miscellaneous costs for travel/mileage, reproduction, telephone, postal, i delivery, reference materials, and incidental expenses. ! The budget provides a breakdown of our estimated cost of performing the services described in this Scope of Services. Our Scope of Services and its associated cost are based on several key assumptions, including the following: ~ 1. The budget is valid for up to six months from the date of submittal/opening, after which it may be subject to revision. 2. City will develop the mailing list for distribution of the EIR and notices. The City will be ` responsible for newspaper cost of publication of notices, which will be billed directly to the City, so they are not included in the proposed budget. V 3. Photocopy costs included in the proposal are for the specified number of copies of deliverables and reasonable incidental and in-team photocopying. If additional copies of deliverables are needed, they can be provided with an amendment to the proposed budget. 4. Review cycles for preliminary documents are presented in the scope of work. Additional i review cycles or additional versions of administrative drafts are assumed to not be needed. I 5. The proposed work addresses CEQA requirements of the proposed action. Work related to NEPA compliance, Section 404 compliance, or other permitting processes is not included (although these can be added, as needed, with a contract amendment). Work concludes at the acceptance by the City of the final deliverable. 6. The budget is based on completion of work within an agreed upon schedule. If substantial ` delay occurs, an amendment of the budget would be warranted to accommodate additional project management time and other costs. Substantial delay is normally defined as 90 days i or more. City of Rancho Cucamonga • 40 • February 19, 2008 P112 r' I ^ ^ ^ ^ CONSULTING Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 7. Costs are included for the number of meetings specified in the scope of work. If additional meetings are needed, they can be included with an amendment of the budget. 8. The extent of public comment on a Draft EIR is not predictable. The proposed budget includes a reasonable, preliminary estimate time to respond to comments. RBF will consult with the City after the valuation of the comments to determine if the preliminarily estimated budget is sufficient. An excessive amount of comments is generally considered to be more than thirty (30) commenting agencies/individuals and/or over 150 comments that require answers other than "Comment is noted." Costs have been allocated to tasks to determine the total budget. RBF may reallocate costs among tasks, as needed, as long as the total budget is not exceeded. 10. Once the proposed project description, baseline, and alternatives are approved by the City for analysis in the Draft EIR, it is assumed they will not change thereafter. If changes requiring revisions to analysis or rewriting of EIR information occur, an amendment of the budget would be warranted. 11. The CEQA statutes or guidelines may change during the course of this EIR. Ii amendments require redoing work already performed or substantially increasing effort, a contract amendment may be warranted. City of Rancho Cucamonga •41• February 19, 2008 P113 i" ^.. I ^ . CON SLJ LTING VII. BUDGET RBF has provided a budget for preparation of an Initial Study, in addition to two alternative budget scenarios for preparation of either an MND or an EIR. 1.0 PREPARATION OF AN INITIAL STUDY TASK G.L. 210 A.A. 135 M.D. 100 G.A. 60 Total Hours TechStudy Repro Total Cost 1.0 PROJECT SLOPING 1.1 Pro ed Kick-Off and Pro'ec! Characteristics 6 6 6 18 52,670 1.2 Research and Investi afion 2 4 6 $670 1.3 A enc Consultation 2 4 6 $670 1.4 Field Reconnaissance 4 4 8 $940 1.5 Initial Stud 1 8 30 6 45 $4,650 1.6 Initial Stud Detenninaiion 8 8 16 $2,760 1.7 Deliverables $250 $250 TOTAL HOURS 15 30 48 6 99 'Percent of Total Labor~Hours) 15.2°k 30.3% 48.5% 6.1°k SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS $3,150 $4,050 $4,800 $360 $0 $250 $12,610 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 512,610 2.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 -PREPARATION OF AN MND r f I f I L TASK G.L. 210 A.A. 135 M.D. 100 GA. 60 Total Hours Tech Study Repro Total Cost 2.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 • PREPARATION OF A MND 2.1 Pre oration of a Screencheck MND 2.1.1 Environmental Anal sis t 12 80 93 $9,830 H drol andDraina ePeerReview $6,300 $6,300 Prelimina Hazardous Materials Assessment $12,000 $12,000 2.1.2 Gra hicFxhibits 8 8 $480 2.1.3 ScreencheckDrattMND 2 4 12 16 $2,160 2.2 Draft MND 1 2 8 11 $1,280 2.3 FinaIMND 1 2 B 11 $1,280 2.3.1 Response to Comments 1 2 12 15 $1,680 2.3.2 Miti afion Monitorin Pr ram 1 2 8 11 $1,280 2.4 Notice of Determination 1 1 4 6 $745 2.5 Meetin sand Coordination 8 20 6 34 $4,980 2.6 Deliverables $2,500 $2,500 TOTAL HOURS 16 45 138 8 207 'Percent of Total Labor IHours) 7.7% 21.7% 66.7% 3.9% SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS $3,360 $6,075 $13,800 $480 $18,300 $2,500 $44,515 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $44,515 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project F114 Environmental Services City of Rancho Cucamonga • 42 • February 19, 2008 r ~A r t I` ^ ^ ^'^ CONSULTING P115 Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project Environmental Services 3.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR TASK G.L. 210 A.A. 175 M.D. 100 GA. 60 Total Hours Tech Study Repro Total Cost 7.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 • PREPARATION OF AN EIR 3.1 Notice of Pre aradon 1 2 2 5 $680 3.2 Sco in Meetin 6 6 72 52,070 7.2 Pre oration of a Screencheck EIR 3.3.1 Introdutlicn and Pu se 1 1 7 9 51,045 3.3.2 Exewtive Summa 1 2 10 13 $1460 3.3.3 Pro'etl Description 3.3,4 Thresholds of Si n~rance 2 1 20 2 4 22 7 $3,120 5680 J.3.5 Cumulative Pro'etls to be Considered 1 2 12 15 $1.680 3.3.6 Environmental Anal sis A. Aesthetic, Li hL and Glare 1 2 24 27 82,880 B. Air Qualit t 4 20 25 $8,500 $11,250 C. Cultural Resouroes 1 4 1fi 2t $2,350 D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials E. H drolo and Water Oualit 1 1 2 4 16 16 19 21 $12,000 $6,300 814,060 $6 650 F. Land Use and Plannin 1 4 30 35 $3,750 G. Noise 1 4 24 29 $6,900 812,050 H. Trans dation and Traffic 7 4 24 29 $26,400 $29 550 I. Public Services and Utilities 1 2 40 43 $4,460 3.3.7 Effects Found Not To Be Si nifranl 1 2 4 7 $860 3.3.8 Growth Inducement - 1 2 6 11 $1,260 3.3.9 Cumulative lm acts 1 fi 6 13 $1,620 3.3.10 Adernatives to the Pro sect Action 1 2 24 27 $2.H60 3.3.11 Addhional Setlions 1 2 8 11 $1,280 3.3.12 Gra hic Exhibits 1 2 24 27 $1,920 3.d Dre(t EIR 3.4.1 Prelimina Drafl EIR 2 6 24 34 $3,900 3.4.2 Com letion of Drafl EIR 2 4 18 4 2B $3,000 3.5 Final EIR 3.5.1 Res prise to Comments 2 20 24 46 $5,520 3.5.2 Milication Monifodn Pr ram 1 2 10 13 $1,460 3.5.3 Findin sand Statement of Overddin Considerations 1 4 20 25 $2,750 1.6 Pro act CooMination and Meetin s 3.6.1 Coordination 24 55 40 119 $16,465 3.6.2 Meetin s 40 90 32 162 $23,750 3.7 Deliverables $0 3.7.1 NOP Distdbufion ~ $750 3.7.2 Preparation of Screencheck Draft EIR $1,500 51,500 3.7.3 Draft EIR $3,000 $3,000 3.7.4 Final EIR 52,000 $2,000 TOTAL HOURS 100 264 4fi7 26 855 'Percent of Total Lahar IHoursj 71.7% 30.9% 54.2% 3.3°h SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS $21,000 $35,640 $46,300 $1,680 $62,100 $7,250 $173,220 TOTAL LA80R COSTS $773,220 G.L. =Glenn Lajoie A.A. =Alan Ashimine M.D. =Michelle Dunn GA. =Graphic Artist Note: M work will be performed a1 a "Not to exceed" ennead price, which will become the fum toed price upon wmpletion of negotiations wAh the Client. The total budget incNdes all miscellaneous costs for trave0mileage, reproduction, raimburseahles, telephone, postal, delnery, reference maledals and inddental expenses. RBF will receive payment either on a percentage basis using milestones w by monthly billing, as oetennined by Ne Client. The RBF project manager reserves the rght to make adjustments to stag allacatbns as necessarywOhin the overall budget. City of Rancho Cucamonga •43• February 19, 2008 STAFF REPORT ENGINEF_RING DEP.~IRTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer (~j P116 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF $200,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1398124-0 FOR UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING FEES FOR THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON THE MWD PARKWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLUEGRASS AVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an appropriation of $200,000 to Account No. 11243035650/1398124-0, for Verizon and Southern California Edison fees to underground utilities, to be funded from Transportation fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's project to install underground utility conduits and street lights on concrete poles in conjunction with the landscaping of the MWD parkway project at the southeast corner of Bluegrass Avenue and Wilson Avenue will be starting this month. Southern California Edison has recently invoiced the City $131,069.19 for their part to underground their overhead facilities and install street lights. We have not received an invoice from Verizon for their costs to underground, however we estimate it to be $69,000. This appropriation will fund these expenditures as soon as possible and then the utility companies can schedule their work. hdi MA:CSB Manager/Community Development Attachments: Vicinity Map i , r.::; P117 ~u HILLSIDE D2~ ~u ILSO AVE 9ANYAN ST O 2 'n I N ~~~ 21 ~~~ a <~ z ~ ¢ ~ ASE LIN RD U 11 1 07 HURC ST w 8TH ST CITY OF RANCBO CUCAfNOM6A EN61MEE81h6 OIIIISION 6TH ST ONTARIO CITY LIMIT PBOIECT: LOCATION: EIIBIBIT: PROJECT MYYD PaNcway Landscape BlueOrass a Wilson lllclnlq- Map MEMORANDUM COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT P118 RANCHO Date: April 2, 2008 G'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM RUN FOR THE WALL FOR A WAIVER OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR LOCAL EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RUN DATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from Run For The Wall for a waiver of fees and charges for local events/activities associated with the Run which will take place over the 2- day period of May 13 and 14, 2008. BACKGROUND: Run For The Wall (RFTW) was started in 1989 as an effort by James Gregory and Bill Evans. They were Vietnam Veterans who traveled across the United States on motorcycles, talking to local radio, TV, and newspapers about the fact that thousands of men and women were still unaccounted for from all of our wars. The RFTW, now anon-profit organization, continues this tradition every May. RFTW gets its message to the public across by riding through the United States to the Vietnam Wall in Washington, D.C. Their primary mission is to promote healing among all veterans and their families and friends. RFTW's goals are: - To guide the participants across America. - To educate future generations as to the importance of accountability in wartime actions emphasizing that no one should be left behind. - To participate in Rolling Thunder in support of their demand for government accountability for Prisoners of War (POWs) and the Missing in Action (MIAs). For the past several months Jim Frost, City Treasurer and 2008 California State Coordinator for the RFTW, has spoken to the Council under Public Comment at City Council meetings regarding the RFTW. On behalf of the RFTW organization, Mr. Frost has sent a letter to the City requesting that the City Council waive all facility rental fees and associated support costs for the Run which will leave from Victoria Gardens in Rancho Cucamonga on May 14, 2008, to travel cross country to Washington, D.C. ANALYSIS: City staff has met with Mr. Frost and representatives from the RFTW regarding their request for support from the City through the City's Event Team Meeting format. The assistance requested from RFTW is outlined below: P119 APPROVAL OFAREQUESTFROMRUNFORTHEWALLFORAWAIVEROFFEESAND PAGE2 CHARGES FOR LOCAL E VENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RUN AP1uL 2, 2008 • Use of Goldy S.Lewis Community Center (the Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda banquet rooms, Mesa Courtyard and exterior parking area) on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 from 4:30 pm until 7:30 pm for a catered dinner and a 'blessing' of the bikes that will participate in the Run. The use of specific facility equipment is also being requested which includes: - sound system - CD player - DVD player - stage - podium - tables and chairs for 400 • Use of the Special Event Area at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter on Tuesday, May 13, 2008, between the hours of 8:00 am until 12-noon. Participants in the RFTW will be able to come to this area for safety training thereby increasing their safety on the road. The RFTW has requested motor deputies to attend this training, if possible. On Wednesday, May 14, 2008 the RFTW participants will meet at Victoria Gardens in the parking lot adjacent to JC Penny's between 5:00 am and 8:00 am in anticipation of the start of their journey. Here, participants will receive a free breakfast and coffee donated through local merchants. The use of Victoria Gardens parking facilities has been approved by Forest City Management. At approximately 7:45 am RFTW participants will exit the parking lot with assistance by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department onto southbound Day Creek Blvd. where they will travel in tandem to the North lanes of I-15. The following is a list of specific resources that have been requested by the FRTW for this activity: 3-man crew from Public Works between the hours of 6:00 am until 9:00 am > 2 electronic arrow boards > advance electronic warning boards > approximately 150-traffic cones > approximately 100 cardboard waste containers and liners 2 deputies and 1 Supervisor from the Victoria Gardens Substation from 6:00 am until approximately 8:00 am n 4-6 Traffic Deputies from 6:00 am until approximately 8:00 am In order to ensure the safety of the participants in the local events/activities as well as the general public it is recommended that the City Council approve the request from the RFTW. RFTW will be providing the City special event insurance for their events naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured. Aside benefit of their events is the fact that riders from across the United States will converge in Rancho Cucamonga in mid-May adding to the to the local economy and media coverage brought to the City. Kevin Mi;~rdle Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&BoardslCityCouncillSlaHReports120081WaiverFees.Charges.Run/ortheWa11.4.2.08. doc P120 STAFF REPORT J\ r ENG INI`:1?.RING I~I?YARTMI~N'P cjZANGHo Date: April 2, 2008 UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ff Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $516,998.48 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,699.85, FOR THE THE HIGHLAND AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN BENITO TO KENYON WAY AND HIGHLAND LANDSCAPE NORTH OF HIGHLAND FROM SAN BENITO TO FAIRMONT WAY, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1 1 24303 56 50/1 51 41 24-0 AND CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 10250015650/1514025-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $516,998.48 to the apparent low bidder, Diversified Landscape Management, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $51,699.85, for the Highland Avenue and Fairmont Way Street Improvements from San Benito to Kenyon Way and Highland Landscape north of Highland from San Benito to Fairmont Way, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Account No. 11243035650/1514124-0 and Capital Reserve Funds, Account No. 10250015650/1514025-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 18, 2008, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $690,163.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders meet the requirements of the bid documents. The Highland Avenue and Fairmont Way Street Improvements from San Benito to Kenyon Way and Highland Landscape north of Highland from San Benito to Fairmont Way scope of work consists of clearing and grubbing, A.C. removals, excavation, curb and gutter, A.C. overlay, cold plane, fill topsoil, cobblestones, automatic irrigation system, controllers, boulders, shrubs, trees and mulch. The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction. Mahdi Aluzri Deput City Manager/Community Development MA: C B: SH/I s Attachment ~a P121 ~~~v~ F~onn sa~u ~~a~~~® ~® ~~-o~an~o~Y uv~v ~OCATB®hV _> > ~, ~+ a'~ a ~ a ~`~ > ~ > a, a m ~ r Y~ ~ m ~, r-,, m o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e'~ Almond Rd,~ ",f ~ I ~ - > ~ ~' g~~'y. ~ ~ ~, -fi - r L -. - Ill m _. r';W ~, 4 Hillside Rd, i ~ ', - s l,~ ,~ ~., ~ ~ -~~~ v 1 ~ Ydllaon ry W i - ' u ~~ l~ u,, ! ~-- m _ , T' ~ -Wilson Av Banyan sty ~ ~ i ' „i ~ ~ ~~-'~ ~ a o _- rr i~ ~ . ".~ ~., ~. ~~ ~ ~ z ~ _ Route 30 r ~ u. ` c. 19th-St ° -'~ l* 3 ~ ~'=~ Highland Av ~L t }~ t f _ 1 i ~' ~ I ~~ ~ __ -~ -~i _ T f ~~ Base LacRsl~ ~ - ~ ' r ~ ase Lute~ltd' ipS u 1 ~~ 17iI r,-~ ~ - IF -F ... 7 I~ ~ ~ _ ~ 0. a~ _-~ -fl ~- ~ c 1 i ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ F2 ~ l L, ~-_. Foothd~,,8~~~ ~ II ~ ~-~ ~ i ~ - `-' ~ `- ~,:t~r ,l a y ~~ 4 ~ ~ C i ~Foo~tull Bt ,4- Arraw~2t I - ~~ = i~ - ~ ~ ow Rt .ty ~ I I 7 ~ L- ! -_ 8th St ' ~ , _- - -'-- 10 Freew~ IQ Bth~St`~t ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ - i _._J -- .~i_u.__d'r'Q ~ ~~ ~ ' _ i i ~'-'----'v ,-.. r ,. , 4th St ~~," '4--.v'--fig- -r~~- -a~- ` ~c- -~f .-,-•.a °-`-__10 Fre e~ m Y _!, ~ _ ~ ~ d 2 Q` _ _ ~ S' W BID SUMMARY' FOR BID OPENING MARCH 18, 2008 avvaaENTLOwl11DDER 2 a P ~ 22 HIGHLAND AVE AND FAIRMONT WAY STREET IMP. FROM SAN BENITO TO KENYON WAY AND HIGHLAND LANDSCAPE N/O HIGHLAND FROM ENGINEER'S Divenl7ied Laadacape REC Roadway Belaire-West SAN BENITO TO FAIRMONT WAY ESTIMATE elan. ement me. En ineeria Landana a Inc. I AT NO QTY UNIT DESCRI['T10N C05T AMOUNT COBT AMOUNT COST AMOIINT C AMOUNT Clearing and Grubbing including removal of mow strip, irrigation and 5x0,000.00 sa,xoo.oo s4.zoo.oo s6],oo0.00 $6].000.00 azo.ooo.oo szo.ooo.oo 1. , Ls landsca a $20,000.00 Remove AC including AC berm and 563.450.00 50.49 5xo,axs.oo $o.az sv,aso.oo Soso 5v.zso.oo 2. az,soo sF sawcuttin $t.so 3. 1,950 CV FII $25.00 596.250.00 S14.00 $25,900.00 528.401 $52$40.00 $20.001 $34,000.00 4. 700 ToN Construct AC Pavement & Overa $90.00 $63,000.00 5100.$01 $]0,350.00 $]8.50) 554.950.00 $100.001 $]0.000.00 5. 3,400 sV Cold Plane $2.00 55,800.00 $3.02 $10,268.00 Sz.601 $a,840.00 $3.001 $10.200.00 InstalUAdjust Water Valve Box and $800.00 513].501 $1,100.00 $130.00 51,040.00 $200.001 $1,600.00 6. a EA Cover to Finish Grade $too.oo Construct Rockscape per City Std. $120,160.00 54.60 $69,092.00 $s.3o $]9,606.00 $A.00 $120,160.00 7 ts.ozo sF 542, Case 1 $8.00 Construct Rockscape per City Std. ss,zoo.oo 5s.oo 50060.00 s6ao $3.2]6.00 sa.oo 50,160.00 a s2o sF 542, Case 1 with 5" Beddin $to.oo Construct Rockscape per City Std. C 3 s6,7oo.00 50.001 55,360.00 ss.ao $3.886.00 5e.oo ss,abo.oo 9 670 sF ase 542, $to.oo 10 20 LF Limited Access Curb $50.00 $1,000.00 53s.oo s]oo.oo sz6.oo sszo.oo sso.oo 51,000.00 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter 536,400.00 sles6 534,3xs.2o 519.001 s34sao.oo szo.oo s36.aoo.oo 11 t,ezo LF includin removal of existin $20.00 Construct PCC Access Ramps including retaining curb and sl.soo.oo sll.zs at.aso.0o s11.so st,3eo.00 sls.oo sl.eoo.oo 12 1zo sF detectable warnin surface $ts.o0 13 s EA Install Guard Dst with sleeve cover $700.00 sa•soo.oo s33o.o0 51,6so.oo 5aso.oo~ sz,zso.oo s]so.ool 53,7so.oo Install Automatic Irrigation System l 5]0,000.00 5131,131.321 $131,13 Lax 5111,000.00 SI 11.000.00 $100,000.001 5100,000.00 14 1 LS COm ete in P ace $70,000.00 Soil Preparation/Fine Grading 16 41000 SF includin a ronomis soils re ort $0.75 530,]53.00 $0.951 $19,95 L80 $0.061 52,960.29 SO.SO $20,502.00 16 1 Ls 60 da maintenance eriod $to,ooo.oo $lo,ooo.oo $as00.oo $3,00.00 az.loo.oo 0x,100.00 $6,000.001 s6.ooo.00 17 2555 EA Shrubs - 1 Gal. $e.oo 5x0.440.00 55.591 $]4,282.45 $6.301 $16,096.50 57.001 $1],885.00 18 1705 EA Shrubs-5Gal. $30.00 $33,150.00 513.391 $14.]90.]0 $I LOOT $12,155.00 $15.001 $16,5]5.00 19 76 EA Tree - 24" box $1,000.00 $76.000.00 5238.811 $18.199.56 $240.001 $18,240.00 $200.001 $15,200.00 20 3530 LF Construct 6" Concrete Header $12.00 $42,360,00 $9.291 532,993.]0 58.50 $30,005.00 $7.00 $24,]10.00 21 510 CY Mulch $30.00 515.300.00 532.84 516748.40 $21.00 $]0,]10.00 $22.00 $1 L220.00 z2 21 EA Landsca eBoulders - 18" $50.00 51,0,0.00 s46.42~ $9]4.az slos.oo~ az.zos.oo sao.oo $eao.oo 23 37 ~ Landsca a BOUIderS - 24° $75.00 $2,]75.00 $91.891 $1,549.93 $190.00 5].030.00 $,0.00 51.850.00 24 a3 EA Landsca eBoulders-36" $125.00 5,,37,.00 $so.oo $2.1,0.00 $260.001 au,leo.oo s].oo ,301.00 25 1 Ls Install Traffic stri in and si nin $1,000.00 ,1.000.00 54.3,0.00 540,0.00 02,900.00 sz.9oo.0o ,9.000.001 s9.ooo.oo 26 9 EA fOr afe $200.00 51,600.00 $522.621 $4,180.96 $960.001 53.680.00 $300.001 $2000.00 SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution 1 L5 ,,,000.00 $071064 ,4710.64 sl.eso.oo ,1.0,0.00 5,00.001 ,,00.00 27 Prevention Plan $5,000.00 TOTALS I 5690,163.00 ( d516,998.4d 4559,329.94 4559,663.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 18, 2008 a 5 6 T p123 HIGHLAND AVE AND FAIRMONT WAY STREET IMP. FROM SAN BENITO TO KENYON WAY AND HIGHLAND LANDSCAPE N/O HIGHLAND FROM A]Reace streetwerka America Weat SAN BENITO TO FAIRMONT WAY Inc. cent BrotLen Inc.. Candace a lac. Me a Wa Eater rises UMT BID UMT UNIT UNIT HO QTY UMT D66CRIP1'ION CO6T AMOVNT CO6T AMOUNT CO6T AMOUNT LO6T AMOUNT Clearing and Grubbing including removal of mow strip, irrigation and $a2.ooo.00 $4z.ooo.oo sao,ooo.oo sao.ooo.oo s3,13eao $3,13e.4o sle,ooo.oo sle.ooD.oo 1. t Ls landsca e Remove AC including AC berm and $o.ao $1].000.00 Soso szl,zso.oo $o.3z s13,600.00 50.60 52..500.00 2. 4z,soo sF sawcuttin 3. 1,850 CV Flll $18.00 $33,300.00 51].001 531.950.00 52x.901 595,190.00 $20.001 83],000.00 4. 700 TON Construct AC Pavement 8 OVera $70.00 549,000.00 592.001 S50,a00.00 599.961 $69,9]2.00 $9295 364,925.00 $3.00 $10,200.00 $1.251 54,250.00 53.fi9 $12,596.00 S2.]SI 89.330.00 5. 3,400 sV Cold Plane Install/Adjust Water Valve Box and $700.00 55.600.00 s200.00 $1.600.00 s295.56 $1,964.49 5300.001 s2,900.00 6. a EA Cover to Finish Grade Construct Rockscape per City Std. $7.00 slos.lao.oo 5].00 slosa4o,oo a6s9 $98,981.80 $].90 SI1s,fi54D0 7 7s,ozo sF 542, Case t Construct Rockscape per City Std. gg,00 Sa,6ao.oo $9.01 $3,900.00 Szo9 $3,6]6.40 SB.BO $9,576.00 B s2o sF 542, Case 1 with 5" Beddin Construct Rockscape per City Std. $9.00 $6,030.00 $'1.30 $5,025.00 $6.591 $4,915.30 s8.25 55,52].50 9 6]0 sF 542, Case 3 10 20 LF Limited Access Curb $25.00 $500.00 $30.00 $600.00 $22.]4 $454.80 $53.00 $1,060.00 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter $77,00 530,940.00 $22.00 $90,040.00 $29.09 $43,843.80 $2].00 $49,140.00 11 1,820 LF InCUdln removal of existin Construct PCC Access Ramps including retaining curb and $16.00 51,9zo.oo $zo.oo sz,aoD.oo $16.16 81,939.20 $16.2. $1.950.00 12 7zo sP detectable warnin surface 13 s EA Install Guard ost with sleeve cover $756.00 $3,9sD.oo 5400.001 $z,ooo.DO $253.291 $1,266.95 $..0.001 az.9so.oo Install Automatic Irrigation System $130,000.00 s13o,ooD.oo slzD,ooo.ool $]zo,ooo.oo $19z,azla] swz.fiz1.39 su2.ooo.oo $112,000.00 la 7 Ls Com late in Place Soil PreparatioNFine Grading afooa sF $o.o5 3z,oso.zo sD.ll saslo.a9 $o.z9 sll.o]LOe so.zs l slo,zsl.oo 15 includin a ronomis soils re Ort t6 ° Ls 60 da maintenance eriod $2.000.00 $2.000.00 ss.ooo.DO ss,DDO.oo sz,4 n.ls 52.9 n.1a szsoo.oD l s2soo.Do 17 2555 EA Shrubs - t Gal. $6.00 515,330.00 S9.00 522,99..00 35.191 513.260.95 56.50 1 $16,609.0 18 7705 EA Shrubs - 5 Gal. $tb.oo 811,050.00 51].001 518,]95.00 513.861 515.315.30 516.00 ' 81],680.00 19 76 E'+ Tree - 24" box $250.00 319,000.00 5220.001 516,]20.00 $204.591 818848.84 $290.001 520,520.00 2p 3530 LF Construct 6" Concrete Header $8.25 529.122.50 59.001 531,]]p.00 $9.991 535,199.10 59.001 531,]]0.00 21 570 CY MUCh $20.00 510,200.00 528.001 $19,280.00 $23.561 $12.015.60 535.001 81],850.00 '22 21 EA Landsca a Boulders - 18" $too.oo $2,100.00 $125.001 52,62..00 $116.001 52,436.00 $]5.001 Sl,s]5.00 23 3] ~" Landsca a Boulders - 24" $200.00 $].900.00 $1]5.001 s6,4]5.00 516].531 $6,198.61 $123.001 $4,625.00 24 a3 ~" Landsca a Boulders - 36'• $325.00 513,9]5.00 $225.001 59,695.00 816].521 $].203.36 $1]5.00 1 59,.25.00 25 7 LS Install Traffc stri in and si nln $4,000.00 54,000.00 $3.500.001 $3.500.00 $3,593.601 $3.]3.60 $3,]00.00 1 $3.100.00 l afety and exit loop detector sta e ~ e a $800.00 53,200.00 $900.001 $3.200.00 $4]8.831 $3.830.69 $550.00 1 $4 a00.D0 26 t fo SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution i LS $70,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,000.00 $9,000.00 $1,436.49 $1,936.49 $1,800.00 1 $1,500.00 27 Prevention Plan TOTALS 8669,48].90 86]1,690.44 8593,26].26 8669,936.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 18, 2008 e 9 rn rr P 124 HIGHLAND AVE AND FAIRMONT WAY STREET IMP. FROM SAN BENITO TO KENYON WAY AND HIGHLAND LANDSCAPE N/O HIGHLAND FROM International Pavement SAN BENITO TO FAIRMONT WAY GMC &n neeri¢ I¢c. Conan Co oration E.C. Constrnction Solutions I¢c. uenT BID uNtT umT uNlT NO QTY UNIT DBBCRIPTION COST AMOVNT COST AMOVNT COST AMOUNT COBT AMOUNT Clearing and Grubbing including removal of mow strip, irrigation and $aBSOa.00 $48.904.00 slas2s.oo $18,825.00 $zsoo.oo $zsoo.oo sla,DODSO sla,oooso 1. t Ls landsca e Remove AC including AC berm and $0.5a $zz,9so.oo $0.46 $19sso.oo $0.70 $z9,7so.DO so.4s $19,12s.oo 2. 4zsoo sF sawcuttin 3. L850 CY FII $20.40 $37,740.00 $IBAI $34,058.50 $42.2x1 $]8,144.00 $20.50 $3],925.00 4. 700 TON COnStfUCt AC Pavement ~ OVella $86.84 $60,788.00 $98.29 $68,]68.00 $]8.191 $54,733.00 $76.001 $53,200.00 $3.04 $10,336.00 $2.621 $9,588.00 $3.00 $10,200.00 $2.401 $B,Ifi0.00 $. 3,400 sY Cold Plane Install/Adjust Water Valve Box and $2x0.00 $1,9zo.oo $a7os9 $aafiaaz $7s.oo $600.00 $zso.oo $2,000.00 6. a EA Cover to Finish Grade Construct Rockscape per City Std. $7.ao $111,148.00 $5.88 $88.317.60 $7.00 $105,140.00 $8.80 $132,176.00 7 15,020 SF 542, Case 1 Construct Rockscape per City Std. $B ao $4.368.00 $].06 $3,67 L20 $7.001 $3,640.00 $9.351 $4,862.00 S 5zo sF 542, Case 1 with 5" Beddin Construct Rockscape per City Std. $7.50 $S,D25.00 $6.471 $4,334.90 $].OO $4,690.00 $9.351 $6,264.50 9 6]0 SF 542, Case 3 10 20 LF Limited Access Curb $24.00 $480.00 $52.991 $1,058.80 $20.00 $400.00 $47.50 $950.00 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter $18 40 $33,486.00 $23.531 $42,824.60 $31.10 $56.602.00 $19.]5 $35,945.00 I I LezD LF inciudin removal of existin Construct PCC Access Ramps including retaining curb and $ta.ao $1,7za.oo $n.6s $2,118.00 shoo $z.D4D.oo $16.00 $1,920.00 12 tzo sF detectable warnin surface 13 s EA Install Guard ost with sleeve cover $26a.o0 $l.azo.oo $941.18 $a.7osso as69.oo az.aas.oo $soo.oo $zsoo.Do Install Automatic Irrigation System $113,684.00 $u3,6sa.oo $124,]05.88 $124,]os.ae $1o9,6es.oo $109,685.00 $lfis,ooo.oD $16s.ooo.oo la 1 Ls Com late in Place Soil Preparation/Fine Grading 41004 sF $0.35 $14,351.40 $0.12 $4,920.48 $0.26 $1I p8L12 $0.251 $10,25 L00 Is inciudin a ronomis soils re ort 16 7 Ls 60 da maintenance eriod $3,400.00 $3,aoo.00 $ssa2ss $s,&azas $z,2as.DO $2,2as.oo $1AOO.oo $l,aoD.oo 17 2555 EA Shrubs - 1 Gal. $4.75 $12,136.25 $7.061 $18.038.30 $6J0 $1],118.50 $6.00 $15,330.00 18 11 D5 ~" Shrubs - 5 Gal. $12.00 $13,260.00 $18.621 $20.796.10 $20.10 $22,210.50 $20.00 $22,100.00 19 7B EA Tree - 24" box $240.00 $18,240.00 $282.35 $21,458.60 $390.]81 $29,699.28 $240.001 $18,240.00 20 3530 LF Construct 6" Concrete Header $9.40 $33,182.00 $10.59 $3],382.]0 $5.001 $1],650.00 $8.801 $31,064.00 21 510 CY Mulch $32.00 $16,320.00 $4].061 $29,00060 $61.411 $31,319.10 $24.001 $12,240.00 22 21 EA Landsca a Boulders - 18" $100.00 $2,100.00 $11].651 $2,4]p.65 $55.83 $1,1]2.43 $30.001 $630.00 23 3T EA Landsca a Boulders - 24" $150.00 $5,550.00 $211.]6 $7,835.12 $111.651 $4,131.05 $40001 $1,480.00 24 43 EA Landsca a Boulders - 36" $250.00 $10,]50.00 $294.121 $32,647.16 $167.481 $7,201.64 $65.001 $2,795.00 25 t L$ Install Traffc stri 1^ and si nl^ $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $3,235.001 $3,235.00 $3.0]0.001 $3,0]0.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 tal l afety and exit loop detector e ~ e $954.00 $3.632.00 $]05.881 $5,64].04 $615.001 $4,920.00 $525.00 $4,200.00 z6 a f for SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution t LS $4,400.00 $a,aoo.oo $a,2ao.oo $a,2ao.oo $zsoD.oo $2soD.oo $s,DOO.oo $s,DOO.oo z~ Prevention Plan TOTALS $694,000.66 8599,646.20 8615,677.62 $fi39,768.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARI' FOR BID OPENING MARCN I8, 2008 1z 12 14 /s P125 HIGHLAND AVE AND FAIRMONT WAY STREET IMP. FROM SAN BENITO TO ICENYON WAY AND HIGHLAND LANDSCAPE N/O HIGHLAND FROM c.s. Legacy Ellte Eobeat service, Laird Canatraction Co., SAN BENITO TO FAIRMONT WAY Covatr0etioa Iac. JMA Cowtzaetioa Inc. Iac. OT ~6T COBi NO QTY UMT OE6CRIPTION CO6T AMOUNT C AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT Clearing and Grubbing including removal of mow strip, irrigation and $810.00 5810.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $20,998.67 520,998.6] 5]8,891.90 $]8,891.40 1. 1 ~s landsca e Remove AC including AC berm and $O.aB $zo,aoo.oo $o.6a 52e,9oo.00 $0.41 517,azs.0o Soso azl,zso.oD 2. az.5oo sF sawcuttin 3. 7,850 CV FI $28.00 $51,800.00 $19601 $36,075.00 $18.001 $33,300.00 530.001 $ss,500.00 4. 700 roN Construct AC Pavement & Overa $109.00 $76,300.00 $112.001 $]8,400.00 $78.001 554,600.00 $95.001 $59,500.00 l Pl $2.96 $10,064.00 $9.001 513,600.00 $2.501 $8,500.00 53.]51 $12.750.00 5. 3,400 sY ane Co d Install/Adjust Water Valve Box and $244.00 51.962.00 sl,ooo.oo 66,000.00 slz5.ool sl.ooo.oo sso.oo $aoo.oo 6. a sA Cover to Finish Grade Construct Rockscape per City Std. $7.00 5305,140.00 $3.]5 $56,325.00 $12.50 5187,75D.DD $6.15 592,373.00 7 15,020 sF 542, Case ~ Construct Rockscape per City Std. gg.oo sa,6ao.oo s6.oo s3.1zD.oo 616.001 $a,32o.DO sz2s $3,no.oD 8 s2o sF 542, Case 1 with 5" Beddin Construct Rockscape per City Std. $8.00 $5,360.00 56.00 $4,020.00 $12.50 $8,375.00 $6.761 $4,522.50 9 670 SF 542, Case 3 10 20 ~F Limited Access Curb $41.00 $820.00 5120.00 $2,400.00 537.00 $]40.00 $27.501 $550.00 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter $25,00 545,500.00 $19.00 $34680.00 $35.001 $63,700.00 $36.001 563,700.00 11 7.820 LF IDCUdIn removal of existin Construct PCC Access Ramps including retaining curb and $14.D0 $1,680.00 s2o.oo $2,400.00 slo.oo 53,200.00 6x6.00 $3,000.00 12 1z0 sF detectablewarnin surface 13 s sA Install Guard ost with sleeve cover ss5too $3.zs5.oo s6so.ool Sa,2so.oo s9oo.DDI $4600.00 6676.001 626]6.00 Install Automatic Irrigation System $109,475.00 $109,4]6.00 5136,350.00 5136,350.00 5115,000.001 $115,000.00 5316,500.001 5116,500.00 14 1 Ls Com fete In Place Soil Preparation/Fine Grading 4mo4 SF $0.50 s2o6oz.oo so.ae $1ssalsz $o.z7 $u.Dn.os so.ls 66,16060 15 includin a ronomis soils re ort 16 i Ls 60 da maintenance eriod $7sfia.DO $7sa9.oD $e,ooo.oo $e.DOO.oo $1,]00.001 $1.700.00 as,ooD.oo $6.000.00 17 2555 EA Shrubs - 1 Gal. $10.00 $26,560.00 $6.001 $15,330.00 $4.651 $11,880.73 $6.50 1 $16,607.50 lg 1105 EA Shrubs - 5 Gal, $23.co $25.415.00 510.001 $11,050.00 $11.501 $12,70250 $20.001 522,100.00 19 76 EA Tree - 24" bOX $341.00 $25,916.00 $200.001 $15,200.00 5235.001 $17,860.00 $275.00 $20,900.00 20 3530 LF Construct 6" Concrete Header $71.00 $38,830.00 $12.001 $42,360.00 $13.501 597,665.00 515.001 552,960.00 2I 610 CY MUCh $46.00 523,460.00 $35.001 517,850.00 $18.501 $9,436.00 550.001 $25,500.00 22 z1 EA Landsca a Boulders - 18" $98.00 az,DSe.oo 6100.001 s2,loD.oo s5z.oo sl,o9z.DO 6100.001 $2,100.00 23 37 ~^ Landsca eBouders - 24" $91.00 53,36].00 $180.001 $6,660.00 5135.001 59.255.00 5200.D0 5],400.00 24 4J EA Landsca a Boulders - 36" $1oe.oo 54.644.00 $220.001 $9.960.00 5230.001 59,030.00 5275.001 511,826.00 25 1 LS Install Traffic stri In and si nln $3.378.00 53,378.00 $8,600.001 $8,500.00 $3,800.001 $3,800.00 $3,250.DD 53,250.00 sta afety and exit loop detector n 9 EA f e $368.00 52,944.00 $1,OOD.OO $8,000.00 5425.DO $3,400.00 $825.001 $6,600.00 26 o te SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution 1 Ls $6,815.00 566 16.00 $7.000.001 s7,ooo.DO $zsoo.oo szsoo.DO SsoD.oo Ssoo.oo z7 Prevention Plan TOTALS 5627,999.00 8634,511.62 6661,795.00 6696,465.00 Page 1 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Tasha Hunter, Engineering Technician P 126 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT LOCATED AT 6767 AMETHYST AVENUE, APN # 020211111, SUBMITTED BY JOHN A. HAFNER. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The property owner, John A. Hafner, requested for a building permit to demo an existing single family residence and to build a new single family residence. Installation of missing public improvements is a condition of issuing the building permit. The City Code requires that all missing public improvements adjacent to the property be completed upon issuance of a building permit. The property owner, John A. Hafner, has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the installation of said public improvements at a later date. Staff felt it was appropriate to defer the improvements because both north and south of Mr. Hafner's property the ultimate public improvements do not exist and conflict with joining would occur. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Submitted, City Manager /Community Development MA:THirlc Attachments P127 RESOLUTION NO. og ~ ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN A. HAFNER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, installation of missing public improvements established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for 6767 Amethyst Avenue has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by John A. Hafner; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement be and hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California P128 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division r -;, ~, x: r' DIY !( ~ ~i~ J ) 11~.- *S. T ? t ~ 4 1 ~ r ` ~ ~ r^ ~ ~" I F'. ~'t 4H k ~ F k k t - ' : H J . ~ ", X l Il 4 ~ ~• ,1' ~ a ~ 4 ~ ~~ £ , .~ i r~Y p " I'... •,~ 1 _ ~, i ' '1 ~ ~ }" t : j {rlt < ~ '1 5 ~ Y w 1 Y ' ~' it ~' { 3 ; k', , P x- ~ ~ ~ 1 F r , ;„ 1 ~ < . 1 ' 5 w ti 1{L . a. 7L:_ ~ .:. . H.,.. t is ,. . , } i 5 ~ let }{,n . f$ N aF .~ e , ~ . ; 13TH 1 s~ ~. J 1. yF 4 , a, r t. ' ' ` t . F ~ i 7T l A T'S ` q(~I '4 ~ y+ !1 V Y: ' ' ' ~ ~ , ...y ' ' ~~ !'e 1! ~ y s r ~ YtL 4 f !Sit L ti ` ''d'~ a ' " i ; j ?.. ~ e oca on >v, -p~1 A ,,; ~, . G -' ~ r _ a 1 t ~ 4 Q ~ ~ • ` ~ H k -~ ,1F I:F ~~ n • y 'I ~ S 1 [ 1 L l 1: ~ . ' . <, W ~ ~+, :~~ i. ,+ a . J _W . r a n, ^~ Y ; . ,- H ,. ~, ~ { ; }~, ~ ~ ~ e a ~ i V ~ n 1 ~ 1 - ~ ` ' ' r ' `4 f r t V ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ V i, 4Ff ' x Y_ i x .c ~ P 1 ~; r t#', '~ ~ ~y" ~ ~~ ~ ~ h i ~ . x y , , ~ ~ t ~ i ~~ 'v ~ }/ P f ~, i i ' l 1 h ' ~ yy,,,,,,~~ b Yt 3 .. ~ I t 1 ~ ' r ~ ~ ,y R• t ti.`. 1 ~ 1 t ~~ f . f, x . . Y N 1 f ~ l ` ~.i i ~ 1 1 i ~ ~ r Jh~ ~'t~1 'Y in i 'ni vJ34~A1{ 91J ~ , y t , -' n ~,." ~~. r r .il 4.. Y ~ ~! S ` I P Y ~ hi r , ~ 5 M ` ~ f __ . 1 ~ 7 '~ + ..i , f-. 3 ~' f f .~~. H ~ ~ 4 '.~41 N W ~~ E S Item: l~7(~7 ~rmell-i'~Sf Title: l~1 ~ r n t ~~ ~~ P129 STAFF REPORT t- ENGINEERING DEP_~1RTI~fENT '~ J' RANCHO Date: April 2, 2008 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Romeo David, Associate Engineeri Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineers.-f Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,982.50 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, LIFESTYLE LANDSCAPES, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,898.25, FOR THE BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1613110-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $88,982.50 to the apparent low bidder, Lifestyle Landscapes, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,898.25, for the Banyan Community Trail from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Beautification funds, Account No. 1 1 1 031 65650/1 6 1 31 1 0-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 11, 2008, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $140,225.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of construction of community trail PVC fence, concrete header, retaining curb, drive approach, tree and shrub removal, miscellaneous grading and placement of decomposed granite (D.G.), etc. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction fitted, Aluzri ~ City Manager/Community Development MA/RD/SH:Is Attachments P130 BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL (FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE) ~ PROJRCT SITE' r •• : _ _ ALMOND Si _ ~~ ~: ~u HILLSI ~ WILS N A ~ ~ 24TH ST • N • = BAN ST a ~ SUMMR Av' MO 0~ N^~ 19 ~~~ HIGH D A J 30 ^ \ ~ ~ m •c7 rn ~~ UN D ~ VICTOR PARK ~' Y J W 1N ~ HUR 5T R ~ FOQTHILL BLVD m ~~^^ 06 D,~ a~~> > ~ ~ lox RROW ~ R w ~ _ ~ > ~ < o ~ < 6NSf R Q U = ~ 6TH ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP x oy oy BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 11, 2008 APPARENT LOW BIDDER x x 1 ~ `x 1 BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM ENGINEER'S America Weat Addxaon Equipmeat AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE ESTIMATE Liles le com antes Laudsca a Rental C T NO QTY UNIT DNSCWITION 08 AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOIINT CO$T AMOUNT CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, FILL, DISPOSAL AND $10,000.00 330,000.00 $3,15D.00 $3,150.00 $9,522.86 $9.522.86 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRADING) 1. 1 LS REMOVE EXIST DIRT AND REPLACE WITH 4- INCHTHICKDECOMPOSEDGRANITE MATERIALS (DG) $85.00 ffi9550.OD ' 3115.00 526,450.00 Sl 10.03 $25,306.90 3350.00 $34,500.00 2. 230 CV SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH AND CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. f Of 530.00 $9000.00 ' $9.25 Sb,475.00 510.23 5'),161.00 58.00 55,600.00 3. 700 SF CONSTRUCT PVC 2-RAIL FENCE PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STD. DWG. 1010- A., MODIfIED HEIGHT. $35.00 $51,625.00 512.50 338.437.50 $35.75 323,231.25 519.00 328,025.00 4. 7475 LF CONSTRUCT CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY E75.00 $3,300.00 $16.00 53,520.00 S2L15 34,653.00 3t3.00 52 860.00 STD. 534 , 5. 220 LF REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS AND RELOCATE ALL EXISTINGIRRIGATION, TRIM TREES, COMPLETE IN PLACE $72000.00 $12000.00 ' $6,600.00 $6,600.00 $5,128.05 55,128.05 $4,500.00 54,500.00 6. t LS BARB WIRE AND INSTALL NEW VERTICAL BARB WIRE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2, Et50.00 $32,000.00 58.75 5700.00 39.12 $729.60 58.50 $680.00 COMPLETE IN PLACE. 7 80 LF CONSTRUCT PCC RETAINING CURB,VARIES E25 G0 S33 250 00 $28 001 $Ia 840 00 517 961 $9 518 80 $36 501 58 74 00 8 530 LF HEIGHT PER PLAN . , . . , . . , . . , 5. WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA COMPLETE /N PLACE. 83,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,680.OD $1,680.00 $1,137.70 $1,137.70 $600.00 $600.00 9 1 LS CONSTR UCT NEW AC PAVEMENT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $7000 51700.00 ' $9.00 $1,530.00 51q.93 52,538.10 $14.50 S2,a65.00 10 170 SF PAINT 4'SOLID WHITE STRIPE, PAINT LEGENDS AND PAINT RED CURB PER PLAN E500.00 $500.00 $1,100.001 $1,100.00 $1,073.231 53,073.23 $1,800.001 $1,800.00 11 1 LS CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE GRAIN OUTLET, LOW CAPACITY PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING N0. f07- $500.00 $500.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $768.04 $766.04 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 A, 45' OF 3' DIAMETER PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 12 1 LS INSTALL TRAIL SIGNS INCLUDING POST 13 2 EA STD. 401-B $g00.o0 $BD0.00 5250.003 $500.OD 5324.95 $6a9.90 $275.001 $550.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,800.00 S2,800.00 $2,042.39 $2,042.39 $3,000.003 $3,000.00 14 7 LS TOTALS $]40,225.00 $88,982.50 593,460.82 597,725.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 71 2008 4 3 r ~ fir' , s 1 International BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM Helalre-Wmt Laadseape Pavement Solutioae AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE Yakar Ivc. Wheeler Pevin Inc. Inc. UNIT HID VN]T UHIT VMT NO QTY UNIT D6BCRIPTION CO6T AMOUNT COST AMOUNT CORT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, FILL, DISPOSAL AND $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 55,000.00 $9,500.00 $4,500.00 $],500.00 $7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRADING) 1. 1 LS REMOVE EXIST DIRT AND REPLACE WITH 4- INCHTHICKDECOMPOSEDGRANITE MATERIALS (OGJ $135.00 $31,050.00 $150.00 539,500.00 $180.00 341,400.00 5180.00 $91,900.00 2. 230 CV SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH AND CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. f a1 gg 00 ' $6,300.00 $10.00 37,000.00 $6.60 $9,620.00 513.00 $9,100.00 3. 700 SF CONSTRUCT PVC 2-RAIL FENCE PER CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STD. DWG. 1010- A., MODIFIED HEIGHT. $20 50 ' $30,23].50 $20.00 529,300.00 517.00 525,0]5.00 523.00 533,925.00 4. 1475 LF CONSTRUCT CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY STD. 534 St9W 54,180.00 $8.00 31,]60.00 59.25 $2,035.00 $10.60 52,332.00 5. 220 LF REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS AND RELOCATE ALL EXISTINGIRRIGATION , TRIM TREES, COMPLETE IN PLACE 8580000 ' 55,800.00 58,000.00 58,000.00 37.000.00 $],000.00 57.500.00 5],500.00 6. 1 LS e BARB WIRE AND INSTALL NEW VERTICAL BARB WIRE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2, 512.00 5960.00 SIO.OO $800.00 510.00 $800.00 520.00 S I,b00.00 COMPLETE IN PLACE. 7 BO LF 8 530 LF CONSTRUCT PCC RETAINING CURB,VARIES HEIGHT PER PLAN 823.00 512,19D.00 325.001 513,250.00 326.001 513,]80.00 318.501 59,805.00 WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA COMPLETE IN PLACE. 524000 ' 5200.00 5500.00 5500.00 5500.00 3300.00 5950.00 5950.04 9 1 LS CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVEMENT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE 56.00 51,020.00 510.00 $1,]00.00 323.50 33,995.00 $12.50 $2,125.00 10 170 SF PAINT 4'SOLID WHITE STRIPE, PAINT LEGENDS AND PAINT RED CURB PER PLAN 5~~ 5500.00 31,000.001 51,000.00 $]30.001 3]50.00 31,200.001 31,200.00 11 1 LS CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET, LOW CAPACITY PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING NO. 107- $680.00 5680.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $650.00 $650.00 A, 45' OF 3' DIAMETER PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 12 1 LS INSTALL TRAIL SIGNS INCLUDING POST 13 2 EA STD. 401-8 3330.00 3620.00 5600.001 51,200.00 $250.001 $500.00 $PS.OO $350.00 14 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 31,100.00 $1,100.00 3500.001 5500.00 $3,500.001 $3,500.00 51,500.001 $1,500.00 TOTALS 597,657.50 $303,730.00 5309,955.00 $119,937.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARI' FOR BID OPENING MARCH 11, 2008 8 B ,u n r I J BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM Grand Pacific Hraughton AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE Contractors Inc. Me wa &vte daea N & P En ineedn Inc. Construction Inc. VNIT Hlll UNIT UAIT VAIT NO QTY UNIT DHSCRIPTION COBT AMODAT COBT AMOUNT CAST AMOIAiT COST AMOUNT CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS. UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, FILL, DISPOSAL AND 510,000.00 530,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $11,]]].00 SI I,n].00 54,012.00 59,012.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRADING) 1. 1 LS REMOVE EXIST. DIRT ANO REPLACE WITH 4- INCHTHICKDECOMPOSEDGRANITE MATERIALS (DG) $114.00 $26,220.00 $12].00 $29,210.00 $23,]]].00 $142.33 $32,]35.90 2. 230 CY SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH AND CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD.fOf $950 56650.00 ' SI0.50 57,350.00 $15.39 $10,]]3.00 S15.]4 $11,018.00 3. 700 SF CONSTRUCT PVC 2-RAIL FENCE PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STD.OWG. 1070- A., MODIFIED HEIGHT. $2600 $38350.00 ' $17.50 $25,812.50 $22.50 $33,18].50 $3 L69 $96,]92.]5 4. 1475 LF CONSTRUCT CONCRETE HEADER PER C/TY STD. 53a YnW $3,850.00 $16.00 53,520.00 Sa9.aa $9,]76.80 527.20 55,984.00 5. 220 LF REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS AND RELOCATE ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION , TRIM TREES, COMPLETE IN PLACE 86,000.00 Sb,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 58,77200 $8,]]7.00 $8,160.00 $8,160.00 6. 1 LS BARB WIRE AND WSTALL NEW VERTICAL BARB WIRE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2, $e.a2 5673.60 S12.00 3960.00 510.96 58]6.80 59.52 5]61.60 COMPLETE IN PLACE. 7 BO LF CONSTRUCT PCC RETAINING CURB,VARIES 8 530 LF HEIGHT PER PLAN 800.00 530,600.00 $29.001 $12,720.00 $25.991 Sla,n4.]o 52220 $19,a16.o0 WITHINTHE PROJECT AREA COMPLETE IN PLACE. S9,ooo.oD $4,000.00 32,500.00 52,500.00 $2,500.00 52.500.00 31,632.00 $1,632.00 9 1 LS CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVEMENT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $14]5 ~ 5250250 ' 323.50 53,995.00 $28.10 59,7]].00 S34.03 $5,]85.10 30 170 SF PAINT 4'SOLID WHITE STRIPE, PAINT LEGENDS AND PAINT RED CURB PER PLAN $825.00 $825.00 $I,344.OO $1,349.00 $97].OO $9]].00 $549.OO $544.00 11 1 LS CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET, LOW CAPACITY PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING NO. 107- $3.000.00 53,000.00 $1,500.00 51,500.00 $1,]]].00 $1,]]].00 $1,360.00 $L360.00 A, 45' OF 3'DIAMETER PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 12 1 LS INSTALL TRAIL SIGNS INCLUDING POST 13 2 EA STD. 401-8 5325.00 5650.00 5420.001 $840.00 $388.501 $]]7.00 $549.001 $3,088.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL. $B,SOO.DO $8.500.00 52,500.001 $2,500.00 S1,]]].OO 51 ]]].00 120.001 32 $2 720 00 14 1 LS , , , . TOTALS $121,826.30 I $123,281.50 $125,304.80 $136,959.35 Page 1 YIJ4 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH11,2008 f1 f9 a f5 BANI'AN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM Bully-l3Wer Convecting REC Roadway Humphrey AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE .TDC Ivc. co. En tveeriv Constructors I no Qtr uxcr nrscwrrlon cost Aefousr rnsr Amovlrr cost Anlovsr cosy Aazovsr CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, FILL, DISPOSAL AND $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $12,965.00 512,9fi5.00 58,400.00 58,400.00 538,500.00 518,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRADING) 1. 1 LS REMOVE EXIST. DIRT AND REPLACE WITH 4- INCHTHICKDECOMPOSEDGRANITE MATERIALS (DGJ 5265.00 360,950.00 $245.00 $56,350.00 32]0.00 $62,100.00 3190.00 $93,]oo.DO 2. 230 CV SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH AND CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY 570.101 $q,50 $6,650.00 $10.00 $],000.00 $11.40 $],980.00 315.00 $IQ500.00 3. 700 SF CONSTRUCT PVC 2-RAIL FENCE PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STD.DWG. 1010- A., MODIFIED HEIGHT. gp5.00 $36,8]5.00 $18.00 $26,550.00 324.50 $36,13].50 $18.00 $26,550.00 4. 1475 LF CONSTRUCT CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY 3f 5.00 $3,300.00 $15.00 $3,300.00 $13.00 32,860.00 518.00 33,960.00 STD. 534 5. 220 LF REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS AND RELOCATE ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION , TRIM TREES, COMPLETE IN PLACE 310,00000 $10000.00 ' $6,]50.00 $6,]50.00 ST,600.00 3],600.00 59,4OD.OD 39,900.00 6. 1 LS BARB WIRE AND INSTALL NEW VERTICAL BARB WIRE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2, St 1.00 5880.00 323.00 31,840.00 $13.00 31,040.00 312.00 $960.00 COMPLETE IN PLACE. 7 80 LF CONSTRUCT PCC RETAINING CURB,VARIES 8 530 LF HEIGHT PER PLAN gt]00 39,010.00 $30.001 $t5,90o.00 316.00 $Bp80.00 353.00 328,090.00 WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA COMPLETE IN PLACE. $$00.00 $400.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $400.00 $900.00 9 1 LS CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVEMENT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $15.00 $2,550.00 538.00 33,060.00 $18.95 53,136.50 $1].00 52,890.00 10 170 SF PAINT 4"SOLID WHITE STRIPE, PAINT LEGENDS AND PAINT RED CURB PER PLAN $900.00 $900.00 S1,000.OO $1,000.00 $950.OO 5950.00 31,000.OO $1,000.00 11 1 LS CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE GRAIN OUTLET, LO W CAPACITY PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING NO. 107- $]$D.DD 3]50.00 $400.00 3400.00 51,050.00 51,050.00 5500.00 3500.00 A, 45' OF 3"DIAMETER PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 12 1 LS INSTALL TRAIL SIGNS INCLUDING POST 13 2 EA STD. 401-8 $350.00 5]00.00 $350.001 $]00.00 $280.001 $560.00 5300.001 5500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3600.00 $600.00 53,300.001 53,300.00 $1,300.001 $1,300.00 $6,]00.001 $6 ]00.00 14 1 LS , TOTALS 5138,363.n0 3141,31s.0n $Saz,394.00 $1s3,]SO.On Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 11, 2008 1s 17 BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM AMETHYST Suarise Landscape Co. STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE New West Si na1 Iac. UNIT BID UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, FILL, DISPOSAL AND $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $14,042.45 $14,042.45 MISCELLANEOUS GRADING) 1. 1 LS REMOVE EXIST. DIRT AND REPLACE W/TH 4- INCH THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE MATERIALS (DGJ $335.70 $77,211.00 $434.90 $100,027.00 2. 230 CY SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH AND CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. f 01 $ii.oo $7,700.00 $23.20 $16,240.00 3. 700 SF CONSTRUCT PVC 2-RAIL FENCE PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STD. DWG. 10f0- A., MODIFIED HEIGHT $26.40 $38,940.00 $34.16 $50,386.00 4. 1475 LF CONSTRUCT CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY STD. 534 $n z5 $3,795.00 $23.52 $5,17a.ao 5. 220 LF REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS AND RELOCATE ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION, TRIM TREES, COMPLETE IN PLACE g12,oo0.00 $12,000.00 $20,32a.6o $20,324.60 6. 1 LS WIRE AND INSTALL NEW VERTICAL BARB WIRE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2, COMPLETE $8.80 $704.00 $9.80 5784.00 IN PLACE. 7 80 LF CONSTRUCT PCC RETAINING CURB, VARIES 8 530 LF HEIGHT PER PLAN $z5.oo $13,250.00 $3a.7i $18,396.30 WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA COMPLETE /N PLACE. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $6,046.99 $6,046.99 9 1 LS CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVEMENT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $23.00 $3,910.00 $20.49 $3,483.30 10 170 SF PAINT 4"SOLID WHITE STRIPE, PAINT LEGENDS AND PAINT RED CURB PER PLAN $1000.00 $1,000.00 $1,679.72 $1,679.72 11 1 LS CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET, LOW CAPACITY PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING NO. 107- $2,875.00 $2,875.00 $1,007.83 $1,007.83 A, 45' OF 3"DIAMETER PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 12 1 LS INSTALL TRAIL SIGNS INCLUDING POST STD. 13 2 EA 401-8 $315.00 $630.00 $447.93 $895.56 TRAFFIC CONTROL. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $10 078.31 $10 078.31 14 1 LS , , TOTALS $178,515.00 $248,566.76 P135 Page 1 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2003- 01085, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 7TH STREET AT THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2003-01085 were approved by the City Council on March 21, 2007, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit: $ 18,900.00 Labor and Material Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit: $ 18,900.00 Due to the redesign of the entire building, construction has not begun. The developer, Scheu Management Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Mahdi luzri Deputy ity Manager/Community Development MA:TLV P136 Attachments LELAND SCHEU %: LLYSCIIV SCHEU MCOUACIE March 6, 2008 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~~ .'~ Cull/or-i~~;t ("'orpn+a rnm Re: Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2003-01085 Dear Trina: P137 -.._'~i ~i B. SCNE'. 1 CRAM A SCHEU Please except this request for an extension to our Improvement Agreement number DRC2003-01085. Our delay was caused by a redesign of the entire building. I have attached the requested Improvement Agreement Extension signed and notarized in triplicate with a check in the amount of $298 as requested. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (909) 982-8933. Sincerely, SMC, a California Corporation _..'. Craig Scheu COO Enclosures l'rr:~.. rh.,Manaae~nzn` faz -.Ju f) 'So 51n(. ~..c:runnr+a 8 4 R. r, ~ u??i T::? ~i.;7 P138 Vicinity Map N. T.S. !' ,' Cal _ le Vcryar Fnant St ~ I f~ 400m 0'~~j 20011 uaybeary Dr ~rrmv Route 9 ~ ~ r ' a lvrow Route '-'- ..S .__._~.__ _._._----' ~-' - _~ . - i m D b `° .d a I 3 U i i . rn u 9th S e 1 1 Crest PI t z Rn u ~ 26th st S a = ~ ~ I g.. 2Sth St i. ~~ BbC T ~ n v ~ I. .. _ Faon Blvd 24[h St i ~ ~ I ..~,_. ~ _._ 9 {I - ' 6taln 5[ 4;chiso.n, !.. Topakz d Santz r {e ~_ ~ _._ ~ ' ' ~ ~ y ~numtaltluAVe < m _.Btrt S[_ ~ _ ... e .:' of z { ~ . i . . ~.. . ~ 1 a oil I .... ~ = acaw St ~ I <' ~ _ ~ D ~ _~th St ~ ry ~ ~ Ede6velss S[ D n 2 I m > e ~ Cameron SI~:i ' ~ ~ E D odar St A DeerUraok St j ~ - s Meadovr St, pRCZ003 ': o -O1D85 a ~ s. E Gth SI 6th St ~ i . - $ k i ro ~' ~ 2 E hlavrthome R N rv o `. 11 .... - .p ~ ~ ~. I I , ~ 1 b a E Bonnk BrdC Q 6 a ~- ~ C ~ ~ $ ' Havrthome Or d ~ u ~~ p y' ~ i E 5[h St ? ti .n `~ _ '`D ~` 5th St ' ` z Li I ~~, Trademark St ~ 1 G ~ ~j_, Fvborokn lk , ~.d x i! Onterprlse St ; ~ ,~ r ~ ~ Shatlwrgrovc Dr ~~ ~ .z d ,p 4th St y ~~ 9th SC < I a' a-- _... _..lv- .. ..-6.. r c-- _ y__._ .. -_ :.z_. ... __ ~ o ~Cucemonpa-GuasU y '~ ~ I D ~ i . Reglonaf Far(, < ~ ~ Contours Sty ro ITEM: DRC2003-01085 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT "A" City of Rancho Cucamonga P139 RESOLUTION NO. Q ~ ~ D7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-01085 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 2, 2008, by Scheu Management Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of 7th Street at the cul- de-sac terminus east of Archibald Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2003-01085; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. Staff Report DATE: April 2, 2008 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REDUCTIONS IN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE (TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 16226 AND 16227) AND (LMD LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 16226 8~ 16227), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY JTY INVESTMENT LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting reduced securities for the remaining work for infrastructure that is partially completed adjacent to and within Rancho Etiwanda Estates. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Tracts 16226 and 16227 located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low Residential Development District, were approved by the Planning Commission on July 24, 2002, for the division of 93 and 145 acres into 265 and 367 lots respectively. On September 7, 2005, the City Council approved an agreement and security submitted by the Developer, JTY Investments LLC, for the installation of "backbone" infrastructure improvements by the "master builder". Infrastructure improvements include perimeter public streets and storm drainage facilities as well as collector streets and storm drains interior to the private gated community known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates (Tracts 16227-1, 16227-2, 16227, 16226-1, 16226 and future tract 16226-2). On September 20, 2006, City Council approved a separate agreement and security for Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscaping on the perimeter of Rancho Etiwanda Estates, also submitted by the Developer. Copies of both agreements and securities are available in the City Clerk's office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE April 2, 2008 Page 2 The improvement agreement for Rancho Etiwanda Estates Infrastructure included five bonds. One, for the channel along the north tract boundary, has already been accepted by the City. Another, for exterior storm drains and the basin at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, will be scheduled for acceptance by the City in the near future. The Developer is now requesting a reduction in the three remaining bonds, for street improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue and the two interior collector streets and storm drains. The Developer is also requesting a reduction in the bond for LMD landscaping. Permit ROW FP Bond Remaining Work New FP Amt New L&M Day Creek, Etiwanda 2005-00276 $1,136,600 $113,600 $227,200 $227,200 Interior Tract 16227 2005-00788 $984,400 $223,500 $447,000 $447,000 Interior Tract 16226 2005-00792 $1,133,500 $179,300 $358,600 $358,600 Day Creek LMD 2005-01006 $4,689,300 $133,100 $266,200 $266,200 The Subdivision Map Act requires developers to furnish performance bonds or other security to ensure that public improvements are built to City standards. Prior to 2006, cities had the discretion to either release said security in full, upon completion of all improvements, or to do a partial release upon partial performance. The City of Rancho Cucamonga chose the former. Assembly Bill 1460 removed that local agency discretion, requiring cities and counties to provide for partial releases of security under specific circumstances. Effective January 1, 2006, subdividers are allowed to request one bond reduction. Government Code 66499.7 states that subdividers may provide substitute bonds or other security to cover 200 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to City approval. BCA Development, the master builder, provided cost estimates for the remaining work, which staff has reviewed and approved. JTY Investments Inc. has requested bond reductions in the amounts listed, which are 200% of the respective estimates. The two improvement agreements remain in effect. City Clerk shall accept riders submitted by the bonding company as follows: Existing Bond Amount Rider Amount Faithful Performance Bond No. 730330S $1,136,600 $227,200 Labor and Material Bond No. 730330S $ 568,300 $227,200 Faithful Performance Bond No. 730331S $ 984,400 $447,000 Labor and Material Bond No. 730331 S $ 492,200 $447,000 Faithful Performance Bond No. 730332S $1,133,500 $358,600 Labor and Material Bond No. 730332S $ 566,750 $358,600 Faithful Performance Bond No. 732367S $4,689,300 $266,200 Labor and Material Bond No. 732367S $4,689,300 $266,200 P141 Riders will not waive or alter any terms, conditions or warranties of the original bonds or agreements. Riders will be attached to and form a part of the existing bonds. P142 Respectfully Submitted, Mahdi ~luzli" Deputy City Manager/Community Development MA:BM/at Attachments VOLpIIf LMVP PMPFAiY LIN X,' Q~~° i ~'S d P143 -4 _y .___ ___ __~ --_ 4 h VI[U(I L.gRyP PgpPfRlY~~- y '~I O e ",I~,.~;; ~ o w w r;, ~ ~, / _ /r/N~ v'~n= +~' 1 ~ _ - ~ s .°/ .. ~~ S ~~~, - .„ ~~, ~ ~°}y J ~ wm ! I~ V Y n ~ s s i ,.i, ~~~ ~I --i .i.P.~ ~', r ~ -y ^ I{ Q :~:,~ v z - ~ p ~w ,~, UU ~~~ z -, . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z" z,r• i ar I /./I-- a R c f' a a a a a I I .- ~ ; ~ ~ U 9NrH36 1 1 li - L 1 1 _ 'e .,~ a / IT A _ 2 \/ _ I i ~ R ? ~ ° pr '~ I ' a _ x !~ I I - .. I I .°. - I I ~ e= ~~'R R'O3 R uCR i I I ~ a a ~ ~- vty ^ ~ .. I I A F ai ~bp¢py I ~ ~ por ~ : ~~ = _ iN ~ II \ V ~/ m \r ~. IL' VV 1' s Q N~ONFISN~ Cry ~0`3~^ r~_~/ I.~',; ~ I I _ \x ~ 3 ~. R ~~~ a r~~,: to 1 I a ( ~_~ ~! I 1 a^ a A ~. tl I I Ci. \ ~ ` ~ ~ Hy~ 43 ~ i I M1 ~ ~ ~ e s~~- ^' ai',r(~ I 1 _a~,~ r e~ 1 I I 1 _ ~ s I 1 x IH - ~ _ e .z I \ 0~~ I 2 ~O ~ _ -~ /4 I x ~ 3 i^ ' 3 R I e a - - i °~ `b v I I ~ ~ ,a ~ - aet a ~ ~, . 1 I Ri s a -~ ~ ~s %~, I I , .y ~ o e _ <i I `\/~ ~~ - - - q I S \\ / ~' ~ ~~ e_ __ I 1 ~' Y 9 I I ® - g _ - CI° n 1 - ~~_ a L .C y0411 I 1 C~~ R ^ YdY I I - a _ R 1 I R G j I I _.~ o 5 A _ ~ ~ ~ `~ ^> ~~ 0 r I \ =~ a ~ a M1 _ \ i a i i a s s s a~ = o a ~ I ° s - N2 - ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ ,~ ~ R J~ \ ~ 3 M s ~ T \ y;, n s ~4J22 I S ^~ - L ' n J` I 3 My^ I I U 1 p J _ - a I e > I I "9 4 _Y CV _~ a '° ~ I 1 x s c e e - o ~/ i I I a i 'i ~ _ .. I .o '® I ~ S~ ,p3 c R _~rtwa_ e $¢ I F s a~ I I n 3 ~~ x °^ < E v~ I I _ < a m [k~ I _ v _ 4 '~ ~ -JYftl g~ I I a - 5 .^, -.. R .~. ~ .^, I I ^ I I c doareem Nosaa o~aodrrv ~ u~3rttnos i ~i ~ .ua3eoue 'o ~ r~ s's oooo-a-ua~zzo Ndv R a x37a~ -~. P144 ~ I 1 5 ~ N E~ ~ ~ W ~~ II '. ~ N b 1 ~ ~ 4 ' I N ' 3 .F". °~ ~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~ ^ £ y c ~"I ~F+ ~ W O G w I ;~ 11I `1 1 ~ ~ ~ x '. W 2 s N _ ly 7 - a ~~\7 1/1 o C \ > ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ /~ i+ ~ ~ V ~ PY VN5 (11'5 V lU N _ C~ ~ T 1 J~ tir 1 I 1 yc ~ Z L~ ~ !l ~~ ~ ~ o J ~r ~~ U? U c7 ' O U w Hz U~a P145 RESOLUTION NO. 0~~ 07.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REDUCTIONS IN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE (TENTATIVE TRACTS 16226 AND 16227) WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously approved an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by JTY Investment LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property described therein, and generally located north of the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such backbone infrastructure improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, has been partially completed, in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tracts 16226-1, 16226, 16227-1, 16227-2 and 16227, which have been approved with improvement agreements of their own for interior improvements to private streets, and in right-of-way dedicated across one future Tract 16226-2; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval a request for bond reduction of the Improvement Security, to reflect the remaining work to be completed; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that said request for bond reduction of the Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to accept on behalf of the City a bond reduction rider to the original bond. P146 RESOLUTION NO. ~O ~ D~Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REDUCTION IN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE (LMD LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 16226 & 16227) WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously approved an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by JTY Investment LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property described therein, and generally located north of the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such Landscape Maintenance District improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, has been partially completed, in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tracts 16226-1, 16226-2, 16226, 16227-1, 16227-2 and 16227; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval a request for bond reduction of the Improvement Security to reflect the remaining work to be completed; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that said request for bond reduction of the Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to accept on behalf of the City a bond reduction rider to the original bond. P147 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: April 2, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2005-00715, LOCATED ON ARROW ROUTE, JERSEY BOULEVARD AND BOSTON PLACE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, LLC It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit, for DRC2005-00715, located on Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard and Boston Place, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga II, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Rancho Cucamonga II, LLC 4400 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 400 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Maintenance Cash Deposit #CR092452 Respectfully submitted, Mahdi City Manager/Community Development MA:TLV $2,140.00 Attachment P148 PROJECT W J Q u z rERSEr ecvv. VINCENt AVE. ,r B /A I 4RAOW j ~/h Q s r. h i 2 ~ W ~ ~ m v ~ 1. ~ ~ Q Q R. R. ~ r,- s r. W Q' O Q h O h V /C/N/ l Y .MAP ~r~c 2oos-~~~~ i 5 `5 HWr. W W Q h A. T E S, f. StREEt ~, Q 3 ~~ STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPAR'T'MENT Date: To: From: By: Subject: April 2, 2008 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Council Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manger/Community Development Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P149 RANCHO cUCAMONGA ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN $2,760.00 OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE CASH DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 17938, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE AT 5TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY ROCK-PITT LLC RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Rock-Pitt LLC have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain $2,760.00 of the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 17938, located on the east side of Pittsburgh Avenue at 5th Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain a portion of the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. ly submitted, MA:TLV Aluzri r City Manager/Community Development Attachment(s) The Roche feller Group January 22, 2008 Ms. Trina Valdez City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Maintenance Bond Parcel Map 17938 Dear Ms. Valdez; This letter is in response to your request for Maintenance Bond of $2,760.00 on our project located on Parcel Map 17938. Rock -Pitt, LLC deposited $27,600.00 for Faithful Performance to the city receipt # CR103187. We aze requesting that you retain a portion of this deposit in the amount of $2,760.00 for the Maintenance Bond and return to us the balance of $24,840.00. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, r Thomas McCormick, S1OR Senior Vice President Rock -Pitt, LLC Rockefeller Group Development Corporation Rockefeller Group Development SrOfl~teM1lcCH~iA~CKa SIORa%~S ESI}I0S VICE PRESIDENT 14 949-468-1800 ! 949-46N4805 Fax Rockefeller Croup Development Corporation 4 Park Plaza, Suile 540, Irvine, CA 92614-6560 Tel: 949-468-1801 Fax: 949-4fi8-1805 P150 P151 CI~ Of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVI510N ,, i ~~ _. f~" ~. a ~ ... ,'.'y-.~., Item: Parcel Map No. 77938 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE P152 RESOLUTION NO. ('~~. (~7,~j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 17938 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 17938 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P153 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16926, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND BUFFALO AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DEB CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Parcel Map 16926 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 16926, located on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Buffalo Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Deb Construction: 2230 E. Winston Rd, Anaheim, CA 92806 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 105026081 $8,000.00 (Bond No.) submitted, Mahdi WJO:TLV Manager/Community Development Attachment(s) P154 VICINITY MAP for Parcel 5, Parcel Map 16926 NOT TO SCALE -. AIAPQUES~ a in _^ _ 1 -I_ - - ---i 1 5rnt><y St 1- N r l~~t s i ~ ,~ ~ n '~" r yry O ~II I IPI ~r~'1~ (f ~ .. / / I~E~ I ~ ~ ! ~ I I tltl~~ ~ ~e~~J~~~l ~ _~~;»~ ~I~ r ~~ J ' Y % ~ I ( _ . _ . y ~ 11 1 r ~... .. B _ _ _ 4 . o ~ ul V gTret ' ~ a ~ r I ~ y P' , ~ , w.t *,nla L I y f l { fld y~ P I 1 { I b" F ' t i l ~ . hllssfon Park W ` ; 15th st I ~ .! a -- - i E M&F~.Vma Or I ''' ~ ° / ~ ~ - y ~' I < ° ~ PARCEL {' / q I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~'f I Cf ~% W I I PMI6`R6 c`-r. ._~ ... F dIF ~ I nw m r 20D7 N®Ouect Nc.. ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION (/1 ~ S[ \ ~L ~: ~1 I1~02__ ~A~' .,, I ... . p,:. ~ '~~ 6 0 S ~, Ontarw MIIIf Pkwy.. ;~ /./ fl .-- E G , Tan Item: Vicinity Map Title: Parcel 5 Parcel Map Ho. 16926 EXHIBIT: 1 Oam ~02C07 NAVTEQ a TtleAttef P155 RESOLUTION NO. ~ D ~D'~P A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16926 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 16926 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II P156 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16542, LOCATED AT 6717 EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF VICTORIA STREET, SUBMITTED BY J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16542, located at 6717 East Avenue, north of Victoria Street, submitted by J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC P.O. Box 2428 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #730984S Respectfully submitted, Mahdi luzri Deputy ity Manager/Community Development MA:TLV $10,700.00 Attachment P157 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: 77eACT I~1ap No. /6592 TITLE: Y/GINITY MAP EXHIBIT: Z V!CINOT Y MAP NOT TO SCALE STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMEA~T Date: April 2, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development 1 By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer ~?w~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer.~- P158 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE HAVEN AVENUE AND 19T" STREET PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-078 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $611,147.17 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Haven Avenue and 19"' Street Parkway Improvement Project, Contract No. 07-078, as complete, authorize the Acting City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $561,957.28 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $61,114.72, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $611,147.17. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Acting City Engineer. The Haven Avenue and 19`h Street Parkway Improvement Project scope of work consisted of fine grading and soil preparation, installation of 6" concrete header, cobble paving and landscape boulders, the planting of 24" and 15 gallon trees, 1 and 5 gallon shrubs, 5 gallon vines, and the installation of irrigation systems including water meters. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ~ Budgeted Amount: Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: $1, 500,000.00 10250015650/ 1504025-0 $894,102.65 City Council's Approval to Advertise: May 2, 2007 Publish dates for local paper: May 8 and May 15, 2007 Bid Opening: May 22, 2007 - Contract Award Date: June 6, 2007 P159 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept HAVEN AVENUE AND 19TH STREET PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT April 2, 2008 Page 2 Low Bidder Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount Land Forms Landscape Construction, Inc. $561,957.28 $56,195.73 $611,147.17 $49,189.89 (8.75%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contract Change Orders including Contract Change Order No. 3 (Balancing Statement). The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract were Change Order Nos. 1 and 2 which provided for the contractor to add access curbs, modified cobble paving and raise the existing controller assembly. The Balancing Statement accounted for some minor quantity decreases. submitted, Mahdi Deputy MA:RD Manager/Community Development Attachment HAVEN AVENUE AND 19TH STREET PARK~PAY IMPROVEMENT HAVEN AVENUE -WEST SIDE, FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 210 FREEWAY 19TH STREET -NORTH SIDE, FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO CARTILLA AVENUE ROJECT SITE r ~• : _ .ALMOND DR. -_ ~• I ~^ HILLSI E ~~ I I ~ ILSO AVE 4• ~ ~ 24TH ST ' N .~ ~ w ~ ~ BAN NST a a '• I SUMMR A -- ~- ---- ~L' -a---HIGH ND-AVE- _.0:-a.J :.__ --- N~^ is H - > 30 -- --- J m U N ~~ I ~, J VICTORI PARK N ~ J __.i C Y w •N ~ a HURC ST RR m < > 5 w o ~. FOt~HILL BLVD m < ^ 66 \/ <I^ ~ ~ ~ • ias o a RR W ~R. O ~• c~ o _ o .. 6TH ST vi a ~ii n w o > •_ 4TH ST °¢ z Z II .~I..! _.V .N_.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP x N~ P161 RESOLUTION NO. O~ X077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE AND 19TH STREET PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-078 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Haven Avenue and 19th Street Parkway Improvement Project, Contract No. 07-078, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and complete. WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~^ L ~_ . r J ~ ~ ~~~ V ' ~ d. c~ ~~ ~ Q~~ ~----- J- a~ '~ > -- O J ~` L W ,~ % ~ .r ~ ~• % 0O N f ~®' ~i 7 a ~;• U J f - \. ~` O s ~ O s M 3 ~+ O O O ~ O O I p t`' .~ O .~..+ ~ ~ •~ ~ O O N . ~ I °o ~ I `~ O '~ ~ O cn N F ~ O ~ N p ~ U O i ~ L O ~ ~ N ti ~ N r ~ O C~ cn ~ I O_ (~ J . r- I ~ co }' N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ° ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - E: ~ W U ~ z a. U ~ O ® \~ °"; ~~ ~ Q W U ... N ra 5 r /~'+)?~~', ~ 111r5~ Q ~~ vm J _.. _r _. _. .__- ____ . _ _ . _ . b ~1~ . .'"- ''~ Oo O O ~ U G ~ Qf ~ C i v I ~ ~ ~ Y C ~~ (1J I U L ~ ` r` a .n` ~) ~ J ~ , W J C ISM I '`~_ O O J O c ° O ~~ o N ~~ ~ vI ~ ~ a E ~ o ~ o ~ U ~ m m U G O O O O O O O O O O O O p o O O O O O O O O O W CL7 ~ N N ` w ,\ V u 4 "` t `` ... MM w O ~~1~ : J „F • ~ ~ ~Cj f C ~ ~ ~ 1, ,,,/ V../ m J I I I I 1 I I I 1 I ~ I 1 I M N O ° ° , ~ I I I I r 1 1 00 O N o I a N M L Yry O ~ Q, ~ .r ,___ ____.r_.~ .___---__ .- _ •. '~ ~"~ ~ .. \~~\ Tye ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ , ~ ~ ~"' • ~.: °. a~ ~ M ~~' ., .. ~ ;a~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I,y,• x ._ ~~y ~~= .> ~ ,~ ~ ~. ~. Z! _ ~y ,. Q ~d ~~ZJ: 'ate ~~'. ~ ~°~ ~ _ -- N a~ o 0 0 ~~~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o U ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ . ~ ~ rn ~ N ~ fA N ~ •L i J ~(•7~ 'i 0 QN •L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Qm U ~ C~ Q a~ ~; ~ ~ o `t° O ,~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ n•~~ ~ •~ c a,~ cn a~ o ~ o L~ z ~°~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ® _=emu Oo° +- ~ ~ ~~~ l ~~ "~~ ~ Y ~ ca o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~-1;-` m J ~~ -, =~ , ~~~~ ~ a _ c~ = ~ `-~ ~ ~ L ~~ a ~. ® ' - ~ C~ ~ a U O C~ (~ `~ O ~ ~ ~ C~ .~ > J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V • ~ G f ~ W ~y u V .. N w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ,.o ~7 m ~~ J Y.. ,...... w . ... ..., s.: _.. ~._....... v . The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation C~dld ,~.~ its featuring Tony Or/ando in Concert Friday-April 18, 2008 Lewis Fami/yP/ayhouse Ga/a ~ Perfnrmance 5125 Performance On/y Tickets s60 Tickets Available NOW through the Lewis Family Playhouse Box Office (909) 477-2752 or visit lewisfamilyplayhouse.com Those in attendance at the 2008 Gala for the Arts wilt be the first to hear the announcement of fine 2008/2009 Lewis Family Playhouse Season. Proceeds raised at the Gala for the Arts will benefit performing arts activities offered through the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation is a nonprofit 5010(3). The purpose of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation is to raise and manage funds to assist in promotingand enrichingthe visual and performingarts in ourarea. Photo Credit Christflpher Voelker P162 Staff Report DATE: April 2, 2008 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director BY: Rina Leung, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TEMPORARY SIGN COMMITTEE UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the standards outlined in the discussion below and provide comment and direction to the Subcommittee. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This report has been prepared to provide the City Council with an update of the progress made by the City Council Temporary Sign Subcommittee (Council Members Sam Spagnolo and Rex Gutierrez). During the February 20, 2008 City Council hearing, the Council requested that the Temporary Sign Ordinance item be returned to the Subcommittee to include provisions for temporary signs in the public right-of-way. During the March 13, 2008 and March 25, 2008 Subcommittee meetings, they developed a provision that permits signage in the public right-of-way. The following is a list of standards developed by the subcommittee to regulate signage in the public right-of-way: • One (two-sided) sign per block for a specific event. o The City Attorney's office will be requested to assist in drafting language that clearly defines a "specific event." For example; an election, open house, or yard sale may be considered specific events; whereas, happy hour and clearance sales would not be considered to be specific events. Political signs would be permitted to be displayed for a period of 45 days prior to an election and removed within five days after an election. All other signs may be displayed 24 hours prior to the event and must be removed 24 hours after the event. Signs must be ground mounted adjacent to the sidewalk in the parkway along the public right-of-way. During the subcommittee meeting, the members were provided with a summary of the City of Hemet's requirements regarding hand-held signs. They also discussed an option to revise the P163 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TEMPORARY SIGN SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE June 5, 2002 Page 2 Sign Ordinance in a manner that separates hand-held signs from other types of animated signs in order to allow for them. The following restrictions with respect to hand-held signs were discussed: • Permitted on the same parcel (on private property) where the main business is located. • Located in areas that do not impede vehicular circulation. • Hand-held signs should not be located in the landscaped areas. • Time limit for display. o Weekends and holidays only versus everyday. o Duration of 30 days. The sign may not be displayed within 14 days from the expiration date of any previously approved temporary sign permit. espectfully submittV~ 0 ~• James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:RUIs ;~ ' ~ ~ ' ~~ - ~ , ~ , ~ , r , ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ , ~ r zs xoo ~~U L Z ._ V U a--~ . . U 0 0 N N ._ L Q W V ._ L 0 ._ i r~ L 0 4~ 0 •- ~ (~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~_, ~ L ~~ a--+ U }' ca O O ~ N }' O ~ N ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I L o N ~ ~ O ~ •j ~ M O (6 ~ Q ~ ~ ~ `~ i ~ O ~ _~ ~ U ~_ ,~ •L o v O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O .~ ~= U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O •v~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~~ ~~z iU~~ ~~U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--+ ~ ~ ~ ~ i- ~ ~ ~ ~ -`-+ N U ~ a~ ~' ~~ L L L -F-+ ~ U O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ •- O (6 ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ • a--~ L .~ .~ ,.~_ ~~ *' ~~ s =,;;~ s` ~ ~~ ~~ ~ h .~ O V .~ zs xoo ~~U +~ ~-+ __ T ~ ~ O ~ U ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ •- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~_^^ ' VJ ~~ O ~ ~ O O n ~ - ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ to O O ~ U ~ - •- - - ~ ~ ~ ° c~ - .> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ o d. U ~ cn ~ • • Q~ ~ ~ ~ U ._ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ y ~^= ~ O O ` ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~~ V `0 ~~ o ~ ~ Q 3 0 ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ Q `~ fl' ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ o _ ~ ~ V U N N O ~z~ a Q l ~ a ~ } ~- ~ ° o ~~ ~ • ~ ~~ j ~~ c c O U ([3 L O ,,^~ VJ ~--r c .~ 0 Q N ~--~ ~--+ .~ O U ~/ J W -,.r W 'U^ V_! VJ ~--+ ca L U _O ~ ~-. L L ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ (t3 O ~_ •~ N L' ~~ ~ ~ ~ N O N I -~-+ Q N U > N N ~ O ~ L •O ~ ~ .~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . d- ) O ; ~.. I U ca ~_ L O C ~_ N W ~~ O C~ I U (6 0 ~_ (/J O N N O ca O Z O ~ U ~ ~ 'v~ ~ ~ Cn -~ ~ ~ > Q N ^ ^ ~` '< ~ , ~: V• ._ .~ ~~ oz U~o ~~~ ~i .~ O U ~i U .O .U .~ L _~ ~ U .~ N ~ > ~~ ~ . ~ Q ~ ~ \~z; ~ ~' f, , S P• ~--+ ~_ ~ 7 -_ )e L O •~ ~ ~~b ~ ~ U > ~ O ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C6 ~ .C ~ Q ~ N +~ U ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ,;~~~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' a--~ .i a~ a~ }' o = a ca ~ ~ N .~ p ~_ O ,~_ ~ D ~ ~ J ~U Z ~- I I I I 1 ,1 V Q zs U ~o ~~U ._ ~ ~ U o ~ - U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ ._ > ~ ±' ~ ~+~-