HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/03/09 - Agenda Packet § PLANNINC. COMMISSK
1977
WEDNESDAY MARCH 9, 1994 7:00 P.M.
I~.NCHO CUC~fONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CH~V. BER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUC~%MONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Roll Call
Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher
Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy__
Commissioner Lumpp
II. Announcements
III. Approval of Minutes
January 12, 1994
Adjourned Meeting of February 23, 1994
February 23, 1994
IV. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
A~ENDM~NT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Consideration of an Environmental Assessment
and Ordinance amending the Development Code to
implement transportation control measures
mandated by State and Federal Air Quality
Regulations. This action will be forwarded to
the City Council for final action and the date
of the Public Hearing before City Council will
be separately noticed.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Environmental
Assessment and Ordinance amending the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to implement
transportation control measures mandated by
State and Federal Air Quality Regulations.
This action will be forwarded to the City
Council for final action and the date of the
Public Hearing before City Council will be
separately noticed.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-04 - INLAND ANSWERING
SERVICES, INC, - A request to establish an
answering service in a leased space of 1,790
square feet within a multi-tenant industrial
building in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at the northeast corner of 6th
street and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 209-261-52.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-05 - BSW
INTERNATIONAL - A request to establish an
arcade in conjunction with a children's indoor
recreation facility (Leaps & Bounds) within the
Terra Vista Town Center in the Community
Commercial District of the Terra Vista
Community Plan, located at the northeast corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue -
APN: 1077-421-70.
V. New Business
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
93-20 - WILKINSON - The development of a 33,000
square foot office building on 3 acres of land
in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8)
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located
at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red
Oak Street - APN: 209-144-80. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
F. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-2! - CAPELLINO A request
to construct a 29,580 square foot industrial
building on a 1.88 acre parcel in the General
Industrial designation (Subarea. 8) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
southwest corner of Arrow Route and Oakwood
Place - APN: 209-471-02.
VI. Public Comments
This is the time and place flor the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
VII. Commission Business
VIII. &djourn~ent
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
~ ....................... ~!i ~'"? i ~41~ ..... i!: ...... ii'ii "~II ' ............. '''' ......... '' .......
i~ I~? :':':"
~ I '~' '~'"'~'"'~'"~ '~ '~ '~' 'i' ~ ~ ~; '~ '~' '~ ~' :::::::::::::::::::::::: ;::::::::::: ;:::; ::::': :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::~ ~:::;:
, .~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:~:~: :~
I H~ i I;::::;::: :; ; :::;: : ; : :':'~ . ::::::::::::: ;::'X':':':-:':I I';:: '
I ~':':':':':':':':':':':':':':': :: ~ i I.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. :: :::: :: I '.::: ~
~ ~ ~ :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: '.'.'~-'~ '~ "'~'~ ~ r
~ ~ V~I P~ ~
I
? ,
', I !,
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE:March 9, 1994STAFF REPORT
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Convission
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT 'AND ORDINANCE
AMENOING THE OEVELOPMENT COOE TO IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION
CONTROL MEASURES MANOATED BY STATE ANO FEOERAL AIR QUALITY
REGULATIONS.
INOUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENOMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONPiENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND
O)[EIlaR)~ AMENDING THE INOUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO
IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES MANDATED BY STATE AND
FEDERAL AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS.
RECOMMENDAT ION:
It is reconmmnded the Planning Comaission review and conmnent on the
proposed ordinances and forward them to the City Council for further
consideration.
BACKGROUND:
The South Coast Air Basin, which includes Rancho Cucamonga, has the worst
air quality in the nation. More than half of the smog in the basin comes
from motor vehicles. Both the 1992 Air Quality Management Plan and the
1992 Federal Attainment Plan for carbon monoxide include transportation
control measures (TCM) for implementation by local governments through
adoption of a trip reduction ordinance. The 1992 Congestion Management
Program (¢MP) for San Bernardino County also contains a trip reduction and
travel demand management element and sets forth a county wide strategy for
meeting mobility goals and air quality requirements.
The County wide strategy involves uniform implementation of a series of
minimum trip reduction measures for new development projects by all
affected cities, so as to avoid pl.acin~l one city at a competitl~
disadvanta~le 'With another.
Rancho Cucamonga is involved in a joint city/county effort led by San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to develop a subregional program
to improve air quality by reducing vehicle trips. Rancho Cucamonga must
. adopt a trip reduction ordinance, or be subject to South Coast Air Quality
ITEMS A & B
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 9, 1994
Page 2
Management District (AQMD) regulations. The City Council recognized this,
and on .June 16, 1993 approved resolution 93-126 committing the City to
adopt a local TCM Implementation Program. The proposed ordinances will
provide a trip reduction strategy suited to the City's needs, while
avoiding further regulation by the AQMD. They will also implement the
provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Air Quality element.
These measures are being adopted by all the Cities and the County within
the SANBAG subregional area. This will prevent any agency from taking an
unfair advantage over the other agencies by not adopting these regulations.
ANALYS I S:
If adopted, these ordinances would amend the Development Code and the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, establishing TCM's as conditions of approval
for new large residential, commercial and industrial development projects
exceeding proposed thresholds. These measures will mitigate air quality
impacts created by the projects as follows:
1. Commercial and industrial projects shall provide showers for cyclists
and walkers and provide preferential parking to accommodate bicycltst
and carpool/vanpool vehicles. In addition, on-site video conference
facilities shall be provided for office developments with more than
1000 employees.
2. Multi family projects with 10 or more units shall provide preferential
parking to accommodate blcyclist and carpool/vanpool vehicles.
3. Residential projects with 500 or more units will provide a
telecommuting center or contribute towards the development of one.
The proposed ordinances include a measure of flexibility in determining
which TCM's are used to reduce trips. All or part of the TCM's may be
modified under certain circumstances. The ordinances provide that if
implementation is tnfeasible, ineffective or redundant, alternative
measures may be considered. When implemented, such alternative TCM's shall
reduce an equal amount of vehicle trips.
The trip reduction measures will be integrated into the existing
development review process and additional review board or process will be
created as a result of this amendment. The ordinances may need to be
amended or superseded from time to time, in order to meet congestion and
air quality goals as experience is gained through implementation of trip
reduction and transportation demand management measures.
CONCLUSION:
Adoption of a trip reduction ordinance is necessary to conform to Federal,
State and local air quality mandates. Failure to adopt a trip reduction
ordinance will result in the following:
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 9, 1994
Page 3
1. Loss of State Gas Tax. If an ordinance is not adopted, the City may
lose' subvention funds from the State Gas Tax. These Punds are used by
the City for street maintenance, including the power for traffic
signals and street lights.
2. Loss of local control. The AQMD is directly responsible to the
Environmental Protection Agency to impose Federal sanctions if Federal
attainment standards are not met by the South coast Air Basin. The
AQMD has indicated it would further regulate existing businesses if
Cities do not enact their own trip reduction regulations. Such
regulations would be mandatory and include requirements for paid
parking lots and additional gasoline taxes. These additional
regulations would be more onerous and impact the local economy more
than the kinds of actions contained in the proposed ordinances. The
ordinances includes actions that will enable trip reduction to occur
without direct regulation to businesses. Through project design and
new facilities which allow people to walk, bicycle and use transit
instead of cars, federal and state mandates to improve air quality can
be met.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The proposed ordinances would establish procedures to help improve air
qua! ity, and therefore the action is categorically exempt from
environmental review provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Respect ~-y~Submi tted,
City Engineer
WJO:PAR:ly
Revised 8/30/93
Att- hn ent A
CORE ACTIONS
DES~ON:
Core ~ctions .~d W ~ adopt~ by all jurisdictions ~n tbe South Coast Air Basin, i.¢. the Valley and
Mountain portions of San Bernardino Co. ntT. The core pro,ram cons~s predominantly of design standards
for new development. Application of these measures to existing development may be considered at the
regional level for ce~nin actions, such as requirillg the instalJation of bicycle parIcing facilities.
ACTION CORE ACTIONS STANDARD T.RV . OF
CATEC, ORY IMPI ATION
~? S~ 1. Require bicycle parking fac'tliti~ as a New non-residentinl and multi-family (of 10 or more
for De,mlolnnent percent~ of auto p~king spece~ in units) development or remodel when discretionary
new non-residential development or review in required.
require secured lockers. Parking mcb ~ocured lockers at · nee of I per 30
l~4finl s~c~s with · mlnlm~m of a three-bike rack.
2. Provide on-sito pede~rien walkways New non-residential and multi-family (of 10 or more
and bicycle facilities to connect each units) development.
building in the development to public
streots.
3. Require shower fac'dities for persons New non-remidentinl development meeting CMP
bicycling or wnlldng to work. threshokls (250 or more pe~k hour trips).
l~i~imu~l of O~ ~W~f f~cility acce#ible to both
5. Require passenger loading are~ in New non-msidentinl and multi-family (of 10 or more
localions cioas to building antranc~ un~) develoimmnt with at iee~t 100 parking spaces.
and ~o as not to interfere with vehicle Loading Amass equivalent to · minimum of 5
6. Require de~il~tion of preferential New non-re~identinl developmant.
putking s!~ce~ for vanpools near Designated I~king sic. es at · rate of [1-21 pexking
buik~ enUl~cu. A~ ~olm~mate, s~:e~ce~ per 100 sqn~ce~ with a minimum of one.
vertical c!eanmces must be no less
than 9'.
8. Provide tre~it improvement~ such as All new residential and non-residential development
b~ Imllon~, bus pade, and bu~ aion~ existing or planned tra~it routes.
shel~rs. Need for and nature to be
14. Provide telecommuting center or New re~lent~ developmont of 500+ unto.
contribute toward development of ·
telecommuting centor.
15. Provide on-~te video confemncin~ Off~ park devekq~ment= for 1000+ employees.
f~cil/ti~
ACTION CORE ACHONS STANDARD t.EV~. OF
CATEGORY IMI~.{~iENTA~ON
17. Reduce parking space requirements to New non-residential development linked to other
account for increased ridesharing and actions that reduce trips.
other modes of transportation.
N~"w F{i{~ 6. Develop bicycle route system To be determined based on countywide bicycle plan
consistent with SCAO's Regional to be released in August 1993.
Mobility Element.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 AMENDING TITLE 17, OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES
MANDATED BY FEDERAL AND STATE AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Development Code Amendment No. 94-01 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City;
and
b. The proposed amendment will establish procedures to help
improve air quality, and therefore the adoption is categorically exempt from
environmental review provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DCA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 9, 1994
Page 2
b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives
of the Development Code; and
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan, or the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15308 of the
State CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 94-01 to modify the
Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, 17.10
AND 17.12, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE,
REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) On March 9, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Development Code Amendment. Following the conclusion of said
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. , thereby
recommending that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment No. 94-01.
(ii) On April 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to
adoption of this Ordinance.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
S~cTION ~: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct.
S~¢TION ~: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proposed
amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, and determines that the proposed
amendment will establish procedures to help improve air quality, and therefore
the amendment is categorically exempt from environmental review provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15308 of the CEQA
Guidelines, and further this Council hereby directs the City Clerk to file a
Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062, regarding this
matter.
S~CT!0N 3: section 17.08.030.E.8 of Chapter 17.08 is hereby added to read
in words and figures as follows:
Res~dent%a~ Districts
E. specie! Use Regulation.s ·
8. Xe!ecom~utinq center~. single-family development of 500 or
' ~ore units shall provide a teleco~uting center or contribute toward the
development of one in an amount satisfactory to the City Council.
Ordinance No.
Page 2
~: Section 17.08.090.C.3 of Chapter 17.08 is hereby amended to
read in'words and figures as follows:
General D~$iqn Guidelines
C. Site Plan Desiqn ·
3. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation should be
designed to provide a safe and efficient system for vehicles
and pedestrians. Points of access shall comply with city
access regulations and shall not conflict with other planned or
existing access points. Two points of access shall be provided
for all but the smallest residential developments. The
circulation system should be designed to reduce conflicts
between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on
adjacent properties, combine access where possible, and provide
adequate maneuvering areas. Curvilinear streets are encouraged
whenever possible. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic shall be
separated, to the extent possible, through the use of a
continuous system of interconnected public and private
sidewalks.
SECTION 5: Section 17.010.030.F.7 of Chapter 17.10 is hereby added to read
in words and figures as follows:
Use Requlations
F. Special Use Requlations .
7. Office parks with 1,000 employees or more. such projects shall
provide on-site video conference facilities.
SECTION 6: Section 17.10.060.C.l.c of Chapter 17.10 is hereby amended to
read in words and figures as follows:
General Desiqn Guide%ines
1. Site Plan DeS~qn ·
(c) Access/Circulation: The access and circulation of a
development should be designed to provide a safe and efficient
system, both on and off the site. Points of access shall be
designed in conformance with the City access regulations. The
circulation system shall be designed to reduces conflicts
between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on
adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where
possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of
access shall not conflict with other planned or existing access
points. Pedestrian walkways shall connect every building with
public sidewalks.
Ordinance No.
Page 3
~: Section 17.10.060.C.l.i of Chapter 17.10. hereby added to read
in words and figures as follows:
GeDera! Des~qn Guidelines
c. Guide~%nes
1. $~e Plan Desiqn · .
(i) Transit Improvements. Transit improvements such as bus
shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall he provided if
determined necessary by the City Engineer and the City Planner
in consultation with the local transit provider.
SECTION 8: Section 17.10.070 of Chapter 17.10 is hereby added to read in
words and figures as follows:
Trip Reductio~
A. A minimum of one shower facility accessible to both men and women
shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each
project which meets the following thresholds:
Commercial 250,000 square feet
Industrial 325,000 square feet
Office 125,000 square feet
Hotels and Motels 250 rooms
B. Office Parks with 1000 or more employees shall provide on-site
video conference facilities.
SECTION 9: section 17.12.040.c.1,.2,.3 and .4 of Chapter 17.12 are hereby
amended to read in words and figures as follows:
C. SP~C%a! Requirements. The following parking requirements are applicable to
~ multi-family residential, commercial and office land uses as
designated. ~ Special stalls shall be closest to the facility for
which they are designated in order to encourage their use.
1. Handicapped: Those commercial and office facilities with twenty-five
(25) or more spaces shall designate two (2) percent or one (1) space,
whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the
handicapped. The designation and design shall conform to state
standards.
2. Motorcycle: Commercial and office Facilities with twenty-five (25) or
more parking spaces shall provide at least one designated parking area
for use by motorcycles. Developments with over one hundred (100)
spaces shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent.
Areas delineated for use by motorcycles shall meet standards set forth
in subsection 17.12.030-C-1.
Ordinance No.
Page 4
3. Bicycle Storage: Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all
multi-family residential projects of more than 10 units, commercial,
office, and industrial districts in accordance with the following=
(a) Minimum spaces equal to 5 percent of the required automobile
parking spaces or ~ 3 bicycle storage spaces, whichever is
greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided,
additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required
automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall
provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike
rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces
required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or
greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole
number.
4. Car pools/Vanpools: Off-street parking close to the building shall be
provided for commercial/office/industrial facilities ~ ~*$~ at
~ the rate of ten (10) percent of the total parking area as
designated for use by car pools and vanpools. If covered, the vertical
clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
SECTION 10= Section 17.12.040.D of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to read
in words and figures as follows:
D. ~d~Parkinq Reduction and Parkinq Structure Provisions. The following
may be required by the City Planner or provided at the option of the
developer when applicable to commercial, residential or office off-street
parking uses.
Sections 17.12.040.D.1,.2 and .3 remain the same.
SECTION !1: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid
by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason
of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs,
sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at
least once in the InLand Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 AMENDING
PART III OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES MANDATED BY STATE AND
FEDERAL AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals-
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-01 as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City;
and
b. The proposed amendment will establish procedures to help
improve air quality, and therefore the adoption is categorically exempt from
environmental review provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with rel&%sd
development; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
IASPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 9, 1994
Page 2
b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan, Development Code, or the Industrial Area
Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15308 of the
State CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 94-01 to
modify the Industrial Area Specific Plan per the attached Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING PART III, REGARDING TRIP
REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) On March 9, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion
of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. ,
thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment No. 94-01.
(ii) On April 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to
adoption of this Ordinance.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct.
S~CT~ON 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proposed
amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, and determines that the proposed
amendment will establish procedures to help improve air quality, and therefore
the amendment is categorically exempt from environmental review provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15308 of the CEQA
Guidelines, and further this Council hereby directs the City Clerk to file a
Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062, regarding this
matter.
SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the District in which
the site is located; and
b. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
Ordinance No.
Page 2
c. That the proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
S~cTIoN 4= That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby approve on the 6th day of April 1994, Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 94-01 amending Part III to read in word and figures as follows=
Part III Section III B.2
8.2. The access and circulation of a
development should be designed to
provide a safe and efficient system,
both on and off the site. Points of
access shall be designed in conformance
with the City access regulations. The
circulation system shall be designed to
reduce conflicts between vehicular and
pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on
adjacent properties, combine circulation
and access areas where possible, and
provide adequate maneuvering areas.
Points of access shall not conflict with
other planned or existing access points.
Transit improvements such as bus
shelters, pullouts and pads shall be
provided if determined necessary by the
City Engineer and City Planner, in
consultation with the local transit
provider.
Part III Section III B.7
B.7. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall
be provided throughout all projects to
connect public streets, parking areas
and public transit facilities with
buildings and pedestrian open spaces.
Part III Section IV F.2
F.2. Required parking shall be located on the
same site with the main use of the
building, or on premises contiguous
thereto, or in a location in accordance
with an approved development plan.
Ordinance No.
Page 3
Car pools/vanpoolst Off-street parking
close to the building shall be provided
for commercial/office/industrial
facilities at the rate of 10 percent of
the total parking area as designated for
use by car pools and vanpools. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be
no less than 9 feet.
Part III Section IV F.4
Bicycle and Other Two
Wheel Vehicular Facilities F.4. Bicycle storage facilities at the rate
of one rack or locker per 30 spaces
(minimum of a three-bike rack) shall be
provided within all development and
relate to planned and existing bicycle
trails in accordance with the
Development Code requirements.
Part III Section IV L
L. VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION
L.1. A minimum of one shower accessible to
both men and women shall be provided for
persons walking or bicycling to work for
each project which meets the following
thresholds=
Commercial 250,000 square feet
Industrial 325,000 square feet
Office 125,000 square feet
Hotels & Motels 250 rooms
L.2. Office parks with 1000 employees or more
shall provide on-site video conference
facilities.
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 9, 1994
TO: -Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission
FPDM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-04 - INLAND ANSWERING SERVICES, INC. - A
request to establish an answering service in a leased space of
1,790 square feet within a m~lti-tenant industrial building in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and
Hermosa Avenue - APN: 209-261-52.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Site Characteristics: The site is developed as "6th Street Co~nerce
Center," a multi-tenant industrial center. It contains three buildings
totaling 39,780 square feet. The site is serviced by three streets namely
6th Street, Hermosa Avenue, and Sharon Court.
B. Parkin~ Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footag9 Ratio Required Provided
3 Multi-tenant
Industrial Buildings 39,780 1/400 sq. ft. 100 146
Total 100 146
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has occupied Suites D and E of Building 2 as shown
in Exhibit "C" as early as August of 1992. It was through the renewal of
his business license that staff became aware of a change in the nature of
the business (from Inland Medical Building Service to Inland Answering
Services, Inc.), and a change of address (from 9087 Arrow Route to 10134
6th Street). Inland Answering Services, Inc. is classified as Business
Support Services which is conditionally permitted in Subarea 5 of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
According to the applicant, Inland Answering Services, Inc. operates
24 hours a day and seven days a week. The number of e~loyees on duty
ranges from four to six (see Exhibit #A#).
B. Compatibility: A consideration in reviewing this application is the
compatibility of the use with the surrounding businesses and uses. Staff
believes that the use is compatible with the office and light industrial
nature of the complex. North, east, and west of the site are existing
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 94-04 - INLAND ANSWERING SERVICES, INC.
March 9, 1994
Page 2
larger manufacturing, industrial or warehousing buildings. South of the
site is vacant. A brief survey of the existing businesses within the site
show that they are predominately office and quasi-office uses such as
contractor's offices. However, a number of them do not have City business
licenses, have not obtained a Conditional User Permit, or are not
permitted in this zone. These businesses (a total of five) have been
notified by staff of their non-compliance with the City's Codes. Separate
Conditional Use Permit applications may be forwarded to the Planning
Commission for review in the future.
C. Parking: Another consideration in reviewing this application is the
availability of parking. The site exceeds the parking requirements by
46 spaces. According to the property management company, the site is
73 percent leased, with approximately 10,600 square feet of space still
available. Therefore, parking is more than ample for the proposed use.
D. Code Co~liance: The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has
reviewed the application and stated that an accurate set of floor plans
must be submitted for their review to verify the location of fire
extinguishers and the specification of fire rating for the carpet. A
condition of approval is included in the Resolution that requires the
applicant to submit such plans to the Fire District for review within
60 days from the approval of this application.
E.Environmental Assessment: This application is exempt per Section 15061 of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the
Inland Valley Dail~ Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and
notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co~nission approve
Conditional Use Permit 94-04 through adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval.
BB=NF=mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "E" - Fire Protection District's Co~ents
Resolution of Approval
..... "~ '"' :"".~ ....... kip
CITY OE l:~'~O.,,.. UCA.,'ViONG^ Trr~:
P~ .NINO. D~SION
E~mff: A SCALE:
CITY OF RANCHO,'.CUCAMONGA
PLANNING. DMSION TITLE: Cd,~
EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE:
2ITY OF RAN'CHO.,..CUCAMONGA
PLAN .N'ING. DMSION TITLE: ~~~,~-~
l~
EXHIBIT: SCALE:
'~' ~'~/"f/~: o
~,,,., III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I~ I~r' IIIII II I III _RA
~ -- NICEIrED --
~ ' ~NNINO
,~ DIVI~
~ ..............
' SI~NED ~ DATE
1 ~ 3 ~A~ - ~LY PAK (~ SE~) 4P472
~~. 4S 472 P~ s ~ N ~ ~ ~Y.
CITY OF .R,R~C'HO... '..~UCAMONGA ITEM: g,.IA~ ~,4'--g~' ~ '~
PLAN .NINO, DI~/ISION N _=
:
EXHIBIT: E SCALE: ... ......~ ·
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TME CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 94-04 FOR ESTABLISHING AN ANSWERING SERVICE
WITHIN A LEASED SPACE OF 1,790 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE IN
THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5 OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-261-52.
A. R~citals.
1. Inland Answering Services, Inc. has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 94-04, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the northeast
corner of 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue and is presently improved with a
multi-tenant industrial center; and
b. The property to the north is industrial buildings, the
property to the south is vacant, the properties to the east and west are
industrial buildings; and
c. The proposed use is compatible to the surrounding land uses;
and
d. The proposed use will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-04 - INLAND ANSWERING SERVICES, INC.
March 9, 1994
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the .above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows~
a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Code, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. That the proposed uae, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below=
p~annino Division
1) The approval is for an answering service with a
leased space of 1,790 square feet. Any expansion
and intensification of the use shall require a
modification to the Conditional Use Permit.
2) Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Development
Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in
effect at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
granted.
3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought
before the Planning Commission for consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4) Any signs proposed for the business shall comply
with the Uniform Sign Program for 6th Street
Commerce Center and the City's Ordinance.
FAre protection District/Buildinq and Safety Division
1) An accurate and detailed floor plan shall be
submitted for Fire Protection District review and
approval within 60 calendar days from the date of
the adoption of this Resolution.
2) Any modification to the approved plane may
require additional review and/or permits from the
Fire Protection District and the Building and
Safety Division.
PLANNINO COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-04 - INLAND ANSWERING SERVICES, INC.
March 9, 1994
Page 3
5. The Secretary to this Commission ehall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS=
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i;~ ~i'
STAFF REPORT
DATE: 'March 9, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-05 - BSW INTERNATIONAL - A request to
establish an arcade in conjunction with a children's indoor
recreation facility (Leaps & Bounds) within the Terra Vista Town
Center in the Community Co~ercial District of the Terra Vista
Community Plan, located at the northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70.
BACKGROUND: On December 13, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the design
of Building Y; and on January 5, 1994, the City Council approved the final
design of Building X. Presently, the shell of the building and the tenant
improvement plans for Building Y are in plan check. The tenant for Building Y
is Leaps and Bounds, an indoor recreational facility which is a permitted use
in the Com~nunity Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The
applicant has designated a game room for the placement of seven token-operated
skill games, as well as four other skill games, within the facility. The
placement of more than three amusement games constitutes an arcade, which
requires a Conditional Use Permit.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: Leaps and Bounds is an indoor family play center with an
emphasis on children as customers. The proposed hours of operation are
generally between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. daily. They will employ approximately
80 people. The number of employees on a shift may range from 15 to 20.
The token-operated skill games are special gemes chosen to help develop
dexterity and coordination in the children. Examples of such games are
Bozo Basketball, skee ball, and a magic coloring book. A detailed
description of the proposed business and its operational characteristics
is attached in the report for the Commission's review (see Exhibit "A").
B. Compatibility: In reviewing this application, staff determined that these
proposed skill gemes are customarily related to the indoor play center.
Since the surrounding uses are either retail businesses, offices,
restaurants, or theatres, staff determined that the proposed arcade would
not cause a problem.
The Fire District has reviewed the floor plan and conceptually approved it
with the condition that detailed plans be submitted for their review and
approval prior to the issuance of any permits for the tenant improvements
and the improvement work be completed and inspected prior to occupancy.
ITEM D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 94-05 - BSW INTERNATIONAL
March 9, 1994
Page 2
C. Environmental Assessment/Correspondence: This application is exempt per
Section 1506~ of the California Environmental Quality Act. This item has
been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
notices have been mailed out to the surrounding property owners within 300
feet of the project site, and the project site was posted.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ends that the Planning Co.hiss ion approve
Conditional Use Permit 94-05 through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
~y pd lalln~r~ BB: NF/j fs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Leaps and Bounds Business Description
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan
Resolution of Approval
ONE WEST THIRD STREET PHONE
SUITE 100 918 582-8771
TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103-3501 FAX
918 587-3594
J~nuary 17, 1994
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Leaps & Bounds
Dear Sirs:
Leaps & Bounds requests a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit for 11 token
operated skill games.
Attached is a detailed description of the typical Leaps & Bounds, hours of operation,
concession menu and photographs of a typical Leaps & Bounds facility.
The proposed facility will employ approximately 80 people. The largest shift will be a crew
of approximately 15-20 people.
Leaps & Bounds provides 11 token operated skill games for the pleasure of their
customers. Special games have been chosen to help develop dexterity and coordination in
the children.
These games are necessary to help keep Leaps & Bounds competitive in the indoor family
recreation market.
Please place this case on the earliest possible agenda of the Planning Commission.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary A. Baker, AIA
Attachments
GAB/klb
/"
1100 West 22fid Street
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Direct Dial Number
TM
LEAPS & BOUNDS®
Leaps & Bounds® is an indoor family play center with emphasis on children's
fitness, fun and interaction with parents. Our market is children: toddlers through
12 year olds and their parents. Children play on state-of-the-art equipment
specifically designed for their age level to develop dexterity, strength, and
coordination. There is an admission fee for each child who must be
accompanied by an adult and adults are admitted free. Birthday parties held in
individual party rooms are an added attraction.
Each Leaps & Bounds facility has a unique play environment with slides, ball
pools, ladders, tunnels, and rope climbs, creating an adventure of supervised fun
for children and their parents. Theplay equipment is padded. and prote~ed
where necessary to prevent injury. The facility specially trains counselors to
supervise individual stations throughout the play area andencourage safe play.
Leaps & Bounds stresses: Security, Safety, Sanitation, and Service. Concerned
parents today worry about the security of their child. At Leaps & Bounds we've
developed a check-in/check-out system that greatly eases parents' concerns.
During check-in time, each child is given a name tag to put on his or her back
and a wrist band. A parent or guardian must accompany each child. During
check-in, the responsible adult is given a name tag and asked to give his or her
name, address, and phone number. Our computer at check-in prints stickers
with pertinent data that is placed on the child's wrist band and the
parent/guardian's name tag. At the time of check-out, the parent/guardian's
name ta.g .sticker and each child's wrist band sticker is checked for a match
before gtvlng them their shoes and permitting them to leave the facility. It is
important to Leaps & Bounds that every parent and child feel safe and secure.
Cleanliness is another top priority at Leaps & Bounds but, even that turns out to
be fun. The unique ball washing machine washes thousands of balls each day
and each piece of play equipment is sanitized daily.
The last key ingredient is service. Our main goal is to provide "play with
purpose",,,. It's important for us to accommodate parents' needs when they plan
a birthday with us for 10 six year old boys, as well as helping a three year old
"master" climbing through a ball pool. We want our customers to have a positive,
fun experience with their children in a safe, secure, and clean environment.
co? qb,-o - ,,
I~ Prin'~Yecycled Pai~er
1100 West 22nd Street
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
......... Direct Dial Number
TM
SPECIFIC FACTS ABOUT LEAPS & BOUNDS®
Estimated Number of Customers per Year: 100,000
Hours of Operation:
Summer: 9:00 am - 9:00 pm Mort. thru Sat.
10:00 am - 8:00 pm Sun.
Winter: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm Mort. thru Thurs.
9:00 am - 9:00 pm Fri. and Sat.
10:00 am - 7:00 pm Sun.
!'[::i""I EXlSTIN~
......... II~ELL I'~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 94-05 FOR AN ARCADE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN
INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY IN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN
CENTER, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE
AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1077-421-70.
A. Recitals.
1. BSW International, Inc., has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 94-05, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. R~solution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the northeast
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue which is presently vacant; and
b. The properties to the north, east, and west of the subject
site are shopping centers and the property to the south is an office park; and
c. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. The proposed use will not have a significant effect on the
environment ·
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-05 - BSW INTERNATIONAL
March 9, 1994
Page 2
a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Code, the Terra Vista Community Plan, and the
purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below=
Plannina Division
1) The approval is for an arcade in conjunction with
an indoor children's play center.
2) This approval shall become null and void if a
Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 24
months from the date of approval, unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning
Commission.
3) This approval shall run with the applicant and
shall become void if the business operation
ceases for more than 180 days.
4) Adequate interior clear space shall be provided
for safe and convenient patron circulation and
shall meet the following minimum standards:
(a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer
than 12 inches from any wall assembly
separating the arcade from any adjacent
building or portion of a building.
(b)Provide a minimum of 60 inches between
amusement devices and any entrance or exit.
(c) Where amusement devices are located along
one side of an aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 66 inches.
Where amusement devices are located along
both sides of any aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 90 inches.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-05 - BSW INTERNATIONAL
March 9, 1994
Page 3
(d) Additional interior clear space may be
required by the Building Official, Foothill
Fire District, or Police Department in order
to maintain public safety.
5) No amusement device shall be used for purposes
of, or in connection with, gambling. The winning
of anything of value shall constitute gambling,
except the winning of a prize in a scheduled
tournament.
6) Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Development
Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in
affect at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
granted.
7) Prior to any use of the project site or business
activity being commenced thereon, all conditions
of approval shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
8) If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought
before the Planning Commission for consideration
and possible termination of the use.
Fire District/Buildinq and Safety Division
1) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence
until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal's regulations have been
complied with. Detailed plans shall be submitted
to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
and the Building and Safety Division for review
and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits. The building shall be inspected for
compliance prior to occupancy.
2) Any modifications to the approved plans after
occupancy of the building may require additional
review and/or permits from the Fire District and
the Building and Safety Division.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-05 - BSW INTERNATIONAL
March 9, 1994
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST=
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commiaaion of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES= COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 9, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 - WILKINSON -
The development of a 33,000 square foot office building on 3 acres
of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of
Arrow Route and Red Oak Street - APN: 209-144-80. Staff
recon~nends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Site Characteristics: The site is part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business
Park II. It is vacant and relatively flat. Street improvements along
Arrow Route and Red Oak Street are completed except for sidewalks and
street lights.
B. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Office 33,000 1/250 ~32 230
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant obtained a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 93-38) for
an office use at this site last September. He also indicated that the
tenant for this proposed office project is the San Bernardino County
Department of Public Social Services.
The proposed project is a two-story building oriented in the middle of the
site. The basic building materials consist of precast concrete walls with
a heavy sandblasted finish and sapphire blue glass with bronze aluminum
window frames. An employee patio area is proposed on the south side of
the building. The north elevation is articulated with a triangular
element, offset walls, and columns which provide an entry statement.
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Co~nittee (Lumpp, Tolstoy, and
Coleman) reviewed the proposed project on February ~, 1994. The Committee
raised several design concerns which are described in the attached
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 93-20 - WILKINSON
March 9, 1994
Page 2
Co~ittee's action co~nents as shown in Exhibit "G." The applicant has
worked with staff in revising the elevations to address the major and
secondary design concerns listed in the Committee's action co~nents.
The revised plans show that the east and west elevations are articulated
with a 9-inch pop-out building wall that is approximately 24 lineal feet
in length. For contrast, both the triangular element and the pop-out
walls are treated with a variegated textured look (fluted). The south
elevation is articulated with the same offset walls and columns.
Landscaping is provided around the employee patio area. Driveway entries
are textured and pedestrian walkways are provided from the public sidewalk
and the customer parking area to the building entry. Also, the applicant
has agreed to provide a bus shelter. Staff believes that the revised
plans a~vess all of the Committee's design concerns.
C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Initial Study Part II
to assess any environmental impacts as a result of the proposed project.
Staff determined that the development of the project would not have any
significant impact to the environment and recommends issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Development Review 93-20 through adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
BB:NF/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "G" - February 1, 1994, Design Review Co~ittee
Action Comments
Resolution of Approval
~ 1'1' ~ LITILl Z,~ T IOhl
:~.~..~__ ~ ~:_~.~: ?-~ I~~ i i~-i-:'--i' '- .....~ '~-----~ ....~ {i
,i..~, t!:~~_-~ ....................
'~ ' 1'.4 Ut ' I tt"l II II
......~, , ] 11~..1,~ ........
...... lii~ ~"~ ( -~
~ ..............., ~ '"~ ~u
O: '. ~ ...' '"..
, .............. ~
~ND A~ 4g8' x 25g' ( 128.g82 SK) (2.ge ACH[S)
KLOOR A~ RA~10 2~ ' ~
HANDICAP ~ REQUIR[D wl'lH ~ VAN ~[[11~ 12 ~ LANDSCAPE COVERAOE REQUIRED
,13.5 ~ ~NDSCAPE COVERAGE PROVIDED 5HE E T
HANDICAP ~OVlO[O WITH VAN -
A1
~: ~ q~-~
C~ OF ~CHO CUC~ONGA E~: ~ SC~E:
P~NING D~SlON
,,
~ ~' I '~---
.~;-?? ............. _ ~ - .':~..
,' ~
· ~.~. ~ ~[ ~
,-.- ~ I 'L '""~'"
' ' I · - ~L~JL_.,: r .... L~ "
{ ', . - ........ ~ II
C~ OF ~CHO CUC~ONGA
P~NING D~SION E~: ~ SeALB:
.J
PLANT PALETTE VERTICAL ACCENT tBHIITlll PLANTING
~.,,,~ --' , .....
F~A~ ~ ~ ' · '
BUS 8TOP A~A 8MOOTN BAG
CONCRETE I~gADER COt. OR ~A8 ~ ~ COVER (TYPICAL)
k /
BLOCK WALL VERTICAL A~ T~ ¢
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT: l~) SCALE:
PLANNING DIVISION
CI'I~ OFi I~.NCHO CUC/UVIONG^
PLANNING DIVISION EXHmlT: ~_.~L SCALE:
· ' !JjjiJ
.- !lJJji
, , , j ,, j , , , , ij:jl~j
J _ ..!, ~ ~&.~.,~ k .....
'" ........' ...." ill
,, J __.._._ .Jjj
, . ......~
' I '"
~-~ ~--~ ~ ...... mJ~il
--:_:~.:.:~_,:_ .~',-~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.~
I
: :: J.
C~ O~ ~O~O
P~N!NG D~SION E~~:F~ SCALE:
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:40 - 6:00 Nancy Fong February 1, 1994
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 - WILKINSON'-- The
development of a 33,000 square foot office building on 3 acres of land
in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red
Oak Street - APN: 209-144-80.
Background:
On September 22, 1993, the Planning Com~ission approved Conditional Use
Permit 93-38 to allow office use on this site. With the submittal of
this Development Review application, the developer has indicated that
the tenant for this proposed office project is San Bernardino County
Department of Public Social Services.
Desi.~n Parameters:
The site is part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park II. It is vacant
and relatively flat. Street improvemen~s along Arrow Route and Red Oak
Street are completed except for sidewalk and street lights.
Staff C~e~ts
The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the
Committee ' S discussion.
Major Issues. The following broad issues will be the focus of Committee
discussion regarding this project=
1. The building plane of the proposed north elevation is treated with
offset w&11s and co1:,~ on the first story, and a two-story
triangular shape buil~Ang element. This two-s~or¥ ~riangular
building element could be a s~ronger focal point by changing the
building materi&ls
2. Provide additional variations and interest ~o the east, west, and
south elevations. For exa~le, adding the same offset walls and
columns as shown on the north elevation.
3. Chan~ the propose~ painted concrete band on the first floor to the
same sandblasted material or a natural color concrete material that
provides a slight con~r&st to the heavy s&ndblasted material.
Secondar~ Issues= Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and
~i~e permitting, the Cosmitres will ~iscues ~he follo~ing secondary
DRC CO~T S
DR 93-20 - WILKIHSO~
February 1, 1994
Page 2
1. Provide a bus shelter on-site. The design and materials for ~his
bus shelter should be compatible to the buildings.
2. Provide landscaping to the west side of the employee rest area.
3. Change the proposed stamped concrete for the two driveway entries
and across the drive aisle at the main entry to interlocking
pavers, heavy exposed aggregate or other textured materials.
4. Provide additional tree wells with tree grates within the main
entry plaza area.
Staff recommends that the C~ittee direct the applicant to revise the
development plans and submit them for staff review, prior to scheduling
=he item for Commission review.
Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Peter Tolstoy, Dan Colman
Staff Planner: Nancy Fens
The Committee directed the applicant to address the identified i~su~-s
listed below:
1. Make the two-story triangular element at the north elevation a
stronger focal point. This can be achieved by changing the
materials to all glass or a different texture materials (can
include integral color) that provide a strong contrast.
2. Provide additional articulation to the east and west elevations by
adding a pop-out section of the two-story building plane. The pop-
out building plane can include a change in the texture materials.
3. The added Pop-out walls and columns at the south elevation and as
shown at the s~eting are acceptable.
The applicant agreed to change the painted concrete bend to sandblasted
material. The applicant also agreed to revise the plans in addressing
all the design i~ems listed under the secondary issues in the staff
report.
The Co--~ttee stated that once the applicant has revised the plans to
address the above ident/fied is~ues to the satisf&c~cion o£ the City
Planner, then the application can be forwarded to the ~ission for
revie~ and approval.
ElD.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 93-20, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 33,000 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING ON 3 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK STREET IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 8, OF THE INDUSTRIAL
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 209-144-80.
A. Recitals
1. Marshall Wilkinson has filed an application for the approval of
Development Review No. 93-20 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resol~t~0n
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above referenced March 9, 1994, hearing, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southeast
corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street with a street frontage of 735 feet
and a lot depth of 260 feet and is presently vacant; and
b. The property to the north contains a post office and is
partly vacant, the property to the south has small industrial buildings, the
property to the east is a large industrial building, and the property to the
west is vacant; and
c. The proposed project meets all applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
d. The design of the project meets all applicable design
guidelines and policies; and
e. The development of the proposed project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-20 - WILKINSON
March 9, 1994
Page 2
3.* Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows=
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan~ and
b. That the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of
the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of
the district in which the site is located~ and
c. That the proposed project is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific
Plan~ and
d. That the proposed project, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission
finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows=
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration
and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of
the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard
to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental
effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as
follows= In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the
information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the
Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-20 - WILKINSON
March 9, 1994
Page 3
5.. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the
application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the
Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
P!annina Division
1) A bus shelter shall be provided. The design of
the bus shelter shall be architecturally
compatible to the building design, subject to
City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of permits.
2) Additional trees shall be provided to meet the
ratio of I tree per 3 parking spaces and i tree
per 30 lineal feet of the project's boundary.
3) A total of 11 bike storage spaces shall be
provided no further than two times the distance
between the main building entrance and the
nearest parking spaces per RCMC 17.12.040.C.4.
Five of the 11 spaces shall be all-weather,
lockable bike storage spaces. The placement of
the bike storage spaces shall be subject to City
Planner review and approval prior to the issuance
of permits.
4)Any public telephone facility shall be placed
inside the building.
EnqineerSnq Division
1) Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated
per City Standards.
2) If the existing drive approach on Arrow Route is
widened, it shall conform to City Standards as
approved by the City Engineer, including
appropriate aligr~ent with a future drive
approach on the north side of Arrow Route to be
centered on the property line.
3) Parkway landscaping on Arrow Route shall conform
to the concepts established on adjacent
properties, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Planner.
4)Special pavers within project driveways shall be
located outside the public right-of-way.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-20 - WILKINSON
March 9, 1994
Page 4
6.. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY-
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES= COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
Re riga
i . 3-J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Those items chewed are Con,ions of ~proval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. Time Limits ~
\Jl. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are / /
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of . ./ /
4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, .../ /
participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a !ire station to sewe the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specifications of the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be tormed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation ol the final map occurs.
5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / ./ .......
first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building parmits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school
district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation ot the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void,
SC - t2/93 ~__~ ~f ~2
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all altected
school districts have entered into an agre:e~ t~ptivately accommodate any and all school
%/~6 impacts as a result of this project.
· Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
V'/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Piannino Division, the conditions ~a~.~ herein,
DevelopmeN Code regulations, and ~_,.J~!~L,I&'T~.I~I/,,.,, . _
.Specific Planeand
pl~r--- ~ ~ ......
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced Ihereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
~'/3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected 1or compliance pdor to
occupancy.
~~4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoq3orating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
~//'5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated tor
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, atc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes tirst.
~/'~ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
\J 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
Sheriff's Department (989-6611) prior to lhe issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units
with all receptacles shielded lrom public view.
V//'9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations,
and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
~~10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as translormers, AC condensers, etc., shall
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satistaction of the City
Planner·
sc- 12/93 2or12~1~
C~n~e~ion
11. Street names shall be submitted for City P~anner review and ap.pmval in accordance with / /
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to app~val of the final map.
12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / .../
including. proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / /
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / /
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations 1or amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Rest;ictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concun'ently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs lirst. A recorded copy shall be
1provided to the City Engineer.
6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / ./
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / /
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and
similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / /
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No.
· Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior aiteraUons which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal ol landmark
trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and approval.
C. Building Design
1. An aifemative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units ../ /
and Ior heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted Ior City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. All dwellings shall have the lront, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / ./
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
sc- 12/93 3of12. ~(~
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / /
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shell be included in building plans.
D. P,a/~ ,mJ Vehicular Acc,, (Indicate detalia on bullcling plan,)
v 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /
'"'2 contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
· Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shell be / /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
3.plazas/recrealional uses.
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / /
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / /
depth from back of sidewalk.
5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / /
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shell be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / /
Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
E..Lan/~plng (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.)
~ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / /
ing in the case of residential development, shell be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or prior final map approval in the case ol a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shell be protected with a construction barrier / /
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shell be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the ari:~orist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods.
3. A minimum of ..... trees pergross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided / /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
~ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~ % - 5 gallon..
4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / /
24-inch box or larger.
· Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / /
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 5(P/o of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
C.o~oleLiO~ Date:
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one -
tree per 30 linear feet of building. / '"/
7. All private slope banks 5 leer or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than / /~
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AII private slopes in excess of S feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1orgreater / /~
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. It. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. It. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy.
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / /
ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satistactory
condition.
10. For multi-family residential and _non-residential development, property owners are raspon- / /
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, lertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / /.~
·This requirement shall be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design o! the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / /
included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping planwhich may be
~/, 1,~313 required by the Engineering Division.
· Special landscape features such as moundtag, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / /
ing side~)(~l,~h horizoBtal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along
~_/'~14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / /
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
~"'/'15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. if located in public maintenance areas / /
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted tor City Planner review and ./ /
approval pdor to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural
,~? growth characteristics of the selected tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
sc - t2/93 Sot t2
F. Signs
\~1. The signs indioated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / /
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / /
project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level ol interior noise
attenuation to below 45 C:.NEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided,
and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Oth~[~ sncles
1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire / /
~~ crotection District Standards.
2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance lree and clear, a minimumof261eetwide / /
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamo.nga Fire Protection
~ District requirements.
%,,~3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / /
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply Ior
,~.//~4. ~ePrOteCtion is available, pending completion of required fire protection system.
applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure 1or mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all
supportive information, shall be oblained from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
sc- ,2/93 eof t~ ~'~
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (g0g) gSg-1883, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. stte Dev~l~ment
,///1. The applicant shall comply with the latest actopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- / /
cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Elecldc Code, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies ol the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / /
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
~/~3 Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
· Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commemial or industrial development or / /
addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development lees at the
established rate. Such lees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
~_/4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation / /
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / /
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / ./
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / /
Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code.
4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / /
building permit application.
~ 1. Grading ol the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / ./ .
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /
perform such work.
3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / /
Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714)
387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit.
4. ~A geological report shall be prepared by a quailtied engineer or geologist and submitted at / /
Jthe time of application for grading plan check.
V 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits- / /
6. As a custom-lot subciivisicn, the following requirements shalt be met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing ¢ornpletion of all on-site / /
drainage facilities necessary for dewaterin§ all parcels to the satisfa~ion of the Building
and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto / /
or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the
Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided / /
properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits !or construction upon
any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel
relative to which a building permit is requested.
d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / /
Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis.)
e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses / /
or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other
alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement
does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / /
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public
facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans
and/or tentative map.
~/'2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets / /
(measured from street centerline):
,~ total feet on ~T
total feet on
total feet on
total feet on
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made / /
for all private streets or drives.
4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: / /
5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs / /
or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involved.
sc-t2/o3 8or12 ~',~,(~
6. Private drainage easements forcross-lit drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated
/ /
or noted on the tinai map.
7. The linal map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the / /
neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the tollowing language:
'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the
construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated
on the map as building restriction areas."
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted Irom each lit to the adjacent lit through the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within luture rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / /
the final map.
~/'~' 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way .... / /
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property.
10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / /
ot 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used aling the right
turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / /
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and ff he/she should tail to do so,
the develiper shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section
66462 at Such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City
to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security
for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the develiper, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have
been approved by the City prior to commencement ot the appraisal.
M. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, passos .... / /
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to
City Standards. Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and
gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / /
constructed for all haft-section streets.
3. Construct the tollowing perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /
STREET NAME CURB & &¢. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET COMM ~EDIAN BIKE
GUTTER PVMT WALK APPR. JGHTS TREES TRAI. ~ TRAIL OTHER
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and ovedays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side-
walk shall be curvilinear per STD. construction fee shall
be for
,J4. Improvement plans and construction:
a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / /
tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the public and/or private street improve-
ments, prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / /
shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new constructionor reconstruction / /
of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or
collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides ol the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes: / /
(1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope.
e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City / /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /
adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. Acash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the co.nstruction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /
installed to City Standards, except for single family lots.
h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. / /
i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / /
5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for / /
review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri-
vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City
~/~6 Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required.
· Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / .
accordance with the City's street tree program.
SC - 12/93 10of' 12 ~'~
~"~7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy.
a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections,
including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight.
Landscaping and other obstructions within lhe lines of sight shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by
moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a streel
tree easement.
8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way:
9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to Ihe / /
issuance of building permits:
N. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of lands~:ape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Slandards / /
shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval
or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the
Landscape Maintenance District:
· A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / /
Beautification Master Plan:
O. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / /
protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer.
2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone / /
designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all
necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall
be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first.
3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final / /
map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage
facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
[aloiect No.:- _ .'~~)
4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within itsright-of-way.
/ /
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge o! a mature tree trunk. / /
6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey oreallows in the event of a / /
blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street.
P, Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / /
gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucarnonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolectlon District,
and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter ot
compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance ol permits,
whichever occurs first.
Q. General Requirements and Approvals
1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into / /
one parcel prior to issuance of building permits.
2. An easement lor a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or / ./
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, Ior:
/ /
3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the
estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessmenl District
among the newly created parcels.
4. Eftwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan / /
Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if
no map is involved.
5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: / /
6. A'signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community / /
Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the
Developer.
7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- / /
pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to
the satisfaction ot the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown
on the approved tentalive map.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ·
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 9, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con=aission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-21 - CAPELLINO - A request to construct a 29,580
square foot industrial building on a 1.88 acre parcel in the General
Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Oakwood Place
- APN: 209-471-02.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Site Characteristics: The site was previously rough graded with the
development of Phase I buildings. No vegetation presently exists on site.
B. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Office 15,948 1 space 63.8 66.0
250 sq. ft./
Manufacturing 1,134 1 space 2.3 3.0
500 sq. ft./
Storage 12,498 ~ space/ ~2.5 13.0
1,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL 29,580 78.6 82.0
ANALYSIS:
A. Background: On January 8, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the master
plan and Phase I development plans for the 52-acre parcel at the southeast
corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue. Subsequently, the applicant has
completed construction of the three buildings within Phase I and all street
improvements for the project. The existing buildings are tilt-up concrete
panels with painted and sandblasted finishes. Brick veneer and green glazing
are used as accent treatments at the office area and in areas of public view.
B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a 29,580 square foot building
just north of Phase I. This building will be the first along Arrow Route.
The building incorporates the same materials (painted and sandblasted
concrete, brick veneer, and green glazing) as Phase I.
The site plan proposed by the applicant represents a positive change to the
approved master plan. Originally, a multi-tenant building was proposed with
parking provided along the Arrow Route frontage. With the revised plans, the
ITEM F
PLANNING COMMISSIO~ STAFF REPORT
DR 93-21 - CAPELLINO
March 9, 1994
Page 2
building 'is located adjacent to the landscape setback, thereby reducing the
number of parking spaces and eliminating the extended drive aisle along the
street frontage.
C. Design Review Committee= The Committee (Lumpp, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed
the proposal on February 1, 1994, and recommended approval of the project
subject to the following conditions:
1. The vertical elements proposed should be eliminated.
2. The center portion of the north elevation should be revised to provide
additional relief. A possible solution includes the use of brick across
the parapet and extending vertically adjacent to the glazing. The
revised plans should be reviewed by the City Planner prior to scheduling
for Planning Commission.
3. The revised east and west elevations submitted by the applicant were
acceptable.
4. Provide landscape fingers at the southerly ends of the parking aisles.
To address the Committee's concerns, the applicant has revised the elevations
to incorporate additional glazing and brick veneer on the north, east, and
west elevations (see Exhibit "D"). Staff believes the revised elevations
address all of the Committee's concerns.
D. Environmental Assessment: In approving the project on January 8, 1992, the
Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for the project. While the
building has increased in size from 18,659 to 29,580 square feet, the
intensity of use of the two buildings is comparable. Traffic generated for
both projects is approximately 160 vehicle trips per day. Therefore, staff
feels that the Negative Declaration issued for the original project
adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed project. No additional
environmental review is necessary.
RECO~ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Development Review 93-21 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval.
BB:SM/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Master Plan
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval
ARROW
,,.,-.-.
EXISTING MASTER PLAN
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
ARROW ROUTE
ARROW ROUTE
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 93-21, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 29,580 SQUARE
FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON A 1.88 ACRE PARCEL IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 8) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND OAKWOOD PLACE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-471-02.
A. Recitals.
1. Capellino/Galleano has filed an application for the approval of
Development Review No. 93-21 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 9th day of March 1994, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on March 9, 1994, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Arrow Route and Oakwood Place with street frontages of 280
feet along Arrow Route and 206 feet along Oakwood Place. The property is
presently rough graded; and
b. The properties to the north and south of the subject site
are designated for industrial uses and are developed with industrial
buildings. The properties to the east and west are designated for industrial
uses and consist of vacant land; and
c. The development of the 29,580 square foot industrial
building is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan; and
d. The application, together with the attached conditions of
approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan and the Development Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-21 - CAPELLINO
March 9, 1994
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan~ and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of
the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located~ and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code~ and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, the Planning Commission issued a Negative
Declaration on January 8, 1992. Further, this Commission finds that the
application is in substantial compliance with the original approval for which
the Negative Declaration was issued.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the
application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the
Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
~lan~q Division
1) Landscape fingers (6-foot minimum width) shall
be provided at the outside edge of the parking
aisles. The plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to building
permit issuance.
Enaineerina Division
1) A lot line adjustment shall be processed prior
to the issuance of building permits.
2 ) A new reciprocal access easement shall be
processed concurrent with the lot line
adjustment.
3 ) All applicable conditions of Parcel Map
12959-1, in accordance with Resolution 92-04,
shall apply.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-21 - CAPELLINO
March 9, 1994
Page 3
4) Street trees shall be installed per City Plan
No. 1472, Sheet 3 of 20.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY=
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST=
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Co~nission of the City of Rancho
Cucamong&, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES= COMMISSIONERS=
NOES= COMMISSIONERS=
ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS=
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
~se items c~ ~ ~a~ of ~v~.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)9~8-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. Tlme Llmltl C, enleia~i2~
/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are / / .
not issued or approved use has not commance<l within 24 months from the date of ap!3roval.
2. Development/Design Review shell be approved prior to I I / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subisct to the approval of / ./
4. The developer shall commence, pefiicipate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced .../ /
participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Dist~'t (CFD) tot the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DIst~t to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be io(=ated, de~lgnad, and built to
all specilications of the Ranclx) CuGamonga Fire Protection District, aml ~hall become the
District's 1::~:~3efiY upon coml~letion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its naedl. In any building of a ~tation, the developer shall com!31y with all
ap!31ica131e laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map occurs.
5. Prior Io recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / /
first, the apl:)lioant sl'~all consent to, or participate in, the estal~lishmont of a Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any settool district has previously establish sucl~ a Community
Facilities District, the apG)#cant shell, in the alternative, conaenl to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District Ixior to the ~ion of the final map
or the issuance of building perm~, w~er comes first. Further, il the affected aclx)ol
district haS not lofted a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Dist~ct within twelve months from
the date of ap13roval of the project and I:~or to the racorclation of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
sc- 2/91 [ 41~' ~FI ~)
?,o,,,= .','o.~/'~ 7'~-~/
This condition shall be waived ff the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommoclate any and all school
impacts as a result of this project, .
J 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of bullcling permits when no map is / /
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be su13mitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district wlt~n 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permils in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
v/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
/.,4/~[x:~-'/"~/~ Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
2. Prior to any use of the proiect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / /
Conditions of Approval shall be compieted to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Unilorm Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshatl's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Ranctx) Cucarnonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
v'/ 4. Revised site plans and building alevatlons incorlx)reting all Conditions of AI3provai shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval Ixior to issuance of building penTtits.
v/" 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street iml:wOvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (suof~ as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
~/' 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / /
Code, all other applicable City Ordk~mas, and appac, at~ Corrm~nlty Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Pentilt iasu~nce.
v/ 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / /
Sherfft's Department (989-~11) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shMIding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash recel~Xacles are provicl~, all trash pick-up shall be Ior individual units / /
with all receptacles shielded from public view.
-v/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, / /
and ttm number of trash rece~acles shall be sul:)ject to City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
v/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as translormers, AC condensers, etc., shall / /-
be located out of public view and adequately screened througt~ the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satistaction of the City
Planner.
11. 811eel n~m~ sl~il ~ ~ub~ lot C~ ~nner .rev~w ~ ~p~v~l in ~ffi~e ~h / /
~ 1 ~. ~1 ~i~ ~ ~ i~iv~l un~s s~11 ~ ~nl~ in ~ clear ~ ~ise ~nner ..... J /
i~,~ ~r ~umi~l~n.
13. A del~d ~an ind~li~ trail w~hs, ~i~m s~s, ~s~i m~, fends, a~ / /
w~ ~ffiml, in ~ffia~ w~h C~ M~er Trail ~~, ~1 ~ ~~ ~r C~y
Planner m,~ a~ a~val ~rto ~val a~ ~a~ of t~ F~al Tr~ M~ a~ p~r
to ~val of strut i~ve~N ~
all tm~, i~i~ fe~i~ and dmi~ ~, in ~n~n ~h ~ i~ements.
14. T~ ~ve~, ~a~ a~ ReMains (C~Rs) ~11 ~ ~h~ t~ k~ ~ ~ine / /
ani~s w~m zon~ r~uim~Ns fort~
~t ~em M su~~ ~1 have t~ ~n
of ~aU~ to ~a~s of ~o~ or ~w~'
CO&Rs.
15. ~e ~ve~s, ~a~, a~ Reffi~ (CC&Rs) a~ ~es of I~mt~n ol t~ / /
~~ne~' ~t~n am su~ ~ ~ ~v~ of t~ P~nn~ a~ E~ineeri~
DNis~ ~ t~ C~ A~o~y. T~y s~11 ~ r~ ~~ ~h ~ ~1 M~ or
~r to t~ ~e of ~i~i~ ~s, whoever
~v~ to ~ C~ Engi~r.
16. Nl~ay8, o~nam~,a~~~sM, ~~m~m~ ~t~W / /
~r, ~~~' ~~n, or ot~ ~ ~~ to t~ C~. ~f of this
lan~ maiffie~e s~11 ~ ~~ ~r C~ Pl~r a~ C~ E~l~r mvMw a~
~val ~r ~ ~sua~ of ~i~ ~.
17. ~lar ~ss ease~s sMII ~ ~~ for t~ ~ of a~m~ t~ e~h ~t or / /
~elli~ u~ shall ~ve t~ ~N ~ r~Ne ~n~N ~ ~ffi ~s or un~ for use of
a ~r ene~ syffiem. ~e e~s ~y ~ ~~ M a ~~n ~ R~ns for
t~ ~iv~n w~ s~l ~ ~ffi~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ol l~ final m~ or
issu~ of ~as, wh~er ~s f~. ~ e~~s ~ ~ ~ ~ng of
shes W v~n, ~ur~, f~ or
18. T~ ~ ~Nai~ a ~~ Ht~ ~~. ~ Me ~1 ~ de~ a~ / /
trees, de~l~n, re~, ~~n ~ ~i~i~ or ~m~ms, or ~s to t~ s~e,
shall ~i~ a ~~n ~ ~ H~ ~~ ~e~ Pe~ ~ ~ H~toric
Presew~ ~~n r~ a~ ~v~.
C. Building ~gn
1. An aaem~Ne e~ syffiem ~ ~i~ to ~ ~~ ~t w~er ~r all ~t~ unfls / /
a~ lot ~ati~ aW ~~ ~ or ~, un~ ~ a~~ e~ syffie~ are
'ti~ of in~ml deve~m s~ ~
i~ in t~ ~i~ ~ a~ ~1 ~ ~~ for C~ ~r ~ a~ ~val
~r to t~ ~a~ of ~i~i~
2. All ~elli~ s~11 have t~ from, s~ a~ rear e~a~ u~r~ w~h arch~ural / /,,
tma~, ~aili~ a~ i~m~ ~lima~n ~ ~ tm~m ~ to C~ Planner
rev~ a~ ~mval pdor to ~a~ ~ ~i~i~ ~s.
Com~e~cm
3. Standard patio cover plans tor useby the Ho~w~' ~~n shall be submM~ for / /
C~ P~n~r
4. All ~f ~~S, in~i~ air ~ne~ a~ ~r ~f ~m~ ~m a~r / ./
pmje~ns, s~11
~mets ~ r~i~ by ~ P~nni~ D~n. S~ ~n~ s~l ~ amh~rally
i~~ w~h t~ ~i~i~ des~ ~ m;~~ to t~ ~i~n ~ the C~ P~nmr.
Detai~ s~11 ~ i~ in ~i~i~ ~.
D. Pa~lng a~ V~Mr
/ 1. AIl~i~t~~la~s~B~veami~m~di~ns~nof6feeta~all / /
~ a 12-~ wak ~ to t~ ~ ~B (~i~ ~).
~a~~nal uses.
~/ 3. All ~i~ ~es s~11 ~ ~b~ ~ ~r C~ ~a~ ~ aB d~ ~les, / /
e~ra~, a~ ex~s s~11 ~ M~ ~r C~ ~a~.
4. All un~s s~11 ~ ~v~ ~h gar~ ~r ~ ~ ~a~ am ~ t~n 18 f~t in / /
~h from
on th~ s~e un~ t~ a~ t~ ~ ~ ~ t~~ for ~ ~r ~ ~hibR
~i~ on ime~r ci~n ai~ ot~r
/ 6. Pla~ ~r ~ s~ ~es s~11 ~ ~~ for t~ C~ P~nner, Ci~ E~r, a~ / /
Ra~ C~~ F~ ProtOn D~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ i~ of ~i~i~
E. ~n~pl~ (~ p~l~ ml~4l~ ~~ m, ~r to ~ N.)
i~ in the ~e
amh~ a~ ~~ ~r C~ ~a~r ~ ~ ~ ~to t~ ~~ ~ ~i~i~
2. Ex~i~ tm~ ~l~ to ~ ~w~ ~ p~ s~ ~ ~~ ~h a mmt~n ~r / /
in a~~t~ ~~ ~ ~ 19.~.110, ~ ~ ~ont~g~a~.
3. A mini~m~ tr~ ~rgmss ~,~~ ~elo~ s~, s~l ~ pmv~ / /
w~hin t~ ~j~: % - ~- i~ ~x or la~, % - 3~ ~ ~x or ~er,
__ % - 24- i~h ~x or ~.r, .. % - 15~, ~ % - 5 ~n..
/ 4. A ~ni~m of ~ % of tr~s ~ ~n the ~ ~aB ~ ~n s~e trees- / /
/ 5. ~hin ~i~ ~, trees s~11 ~ ~a~ ~ a ~e ~ o~ l~l~n tr~ ~r e~W three / /_
~i~ ~al~, ~ff~ Io ~ 5~. of t~ ~i~ ~ea ~ ~ ~n on ~ 21.
SC - 2/9! 4~A;~ ~'-( ,--~
6. Treessha~~bsplantec~inareas~fpub~icviewadjacentt~anc~a~~ngstructuresatarate~~~ne
tree per 30 linear feet of building. / /
V// 7. AIIl:~tvate$1ofMbenksSlaetorleasinverticalheightandof5:1 orgreatersiope, but less than / ...J
2:1 SIOIM, shall IM, at minimum, irrigated and sandec, aped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
~/// 8. AIIprtvatesiopeeinexcessofSfeet, but less than 8 feet inverticalheightandof2:l orgreater / /
slope shall be Mndscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their alopearance as
follows: o11o 15-gailon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. if. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and a12GH~e ground cover. In acldition, sio10e
banks in exoees of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slof:m shall also include one
5-gelion or larger size tree per each 250 sq. It. of elope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy.
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / /
ously malntalnecl in a healthy and thriving condition by the devoiolMr until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occtqMncy for thoee units, an inspection
shall be conducted by tim Planning Division to determine that they are in Setistactory
10. For muiti-famity residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / /
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be ke!:X free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any clamaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within :30 days from the date of damage.
11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / ...........
· This requirement shall be in addition to tim required
street trees and slope planting.
/ 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landacaplng, end sidewalks shall be / /
included in the roquirecl landsoape plans and shall be 8ul:Jjact to City Planner review and
al:~:woval and coordinated for consistency with any I:)aJfMay laficJaca~ing plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
~ 13. Special landscape features such as moundtng, alluvial rock, Sl:)acimon size trees, meander- ./ ./
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and inlensitied laficlaca~, is required along
~// 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the ~ right-of-way on / !
the perimeter of this project area shat! be continuously maintained by the developer.
V/// 15. All walls shall be provided with clecorativo treatmenl. #located in i:)ubllc maintenance areas ....... ./
the design artall be coordinated with tim Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be deveioped and sul~nitted for City Planner review and / /
~val prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural
growth clqaracteristics of the selected tree species.
L// 17. Landscal:)ing and irrigation shall he designed to conserve water through tim pdncil~les o! --/ /--.
XedacalM as defined in Chal:Xer 19.16 of tho Ranche Cucarrunga MunicilMI Code.
F. S~ne
v/' 1. Thesignsindioatedonthesut3mittedplansare:~ualonlyandnotapartof thisa1313roval. / /
Any signs proposed for this cleve~p~ ~'aii ~mply ~ the sign Ordinance and shell
require separate ~n a~ ;~val ~ the Planning Divert 13rior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Programfortniscleveiopmentshallbesut)mittedlorCity Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes .../ /
prior to ocx;upancy end shall require separate al:~ion and a13Proval by the Planning
Division prior to issuertoe of building permits.
G. Environmentat
1. The deveioper shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to acoepting a
cash demslt on any property.
2. The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any properly.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / /
project in a stan(larcl format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
4. A final acoustical report shell be submitted for City Planner review and N3pmval prior to the / /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided,
and il appropriate, verify the ade<Nacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencl#
v/' 1: Emergenny secondary acoesa sheit be I:a'ovided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire / /
Protection District Standards.
v/ 2. Emergency access shellbe13e:wlded, maintenance free and clear, a minlmum of 261eet wide / /
at all times during construction in accorclance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
V/ 3. Prior to issuance of buiiding permits for coml3uatible construction, evidence shell be / /
submittool to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolaction District that temporary water supply for
fire protection is availaisle, pending com!:)lation of required fire protection system.
v// 4. The applicant shell contact the U.S. Postal Service to detertrine the appmpdae type and / /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential deveiopments shall I:mWide a solid overtmad
structure for mail boxes with adequate ligNing. The final iocatio~ of the mall boxes ancl the
design o! the weftmad structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using SelXiC tank facilities, written certification of acOelXal:~lity, inciteling all / /.
supportive information, shell be oblained from the S~n Bern~fdi~ County Delmrtment of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Se13tic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. ,
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 98~1863, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Site Development
/ ~. The al)plic~nt shall cornply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- / /
cat Cocle, Unllorm Plumi)ing Code, National Electric Code, and all other apt:)licat)le codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of reiative permits. Please
contact the Building ancI Safety Division for copies of the Cocle Adoption Ordinance and
alx)licat)le handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition /
to existing unit(s), the a13plicarlt shall pay development fees at the eatal=itshed rate. Such lees
may inciucle, but are not limited to: City Beautilic, ation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checidng Fees, and School Fees.
v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or Industrial development or . ../ /
addition to an existing development, the arCGcant shall pay development lees at the
Sstat)lishecI rate. Such tees may inclucle, but are not limited to: Systems Deveiopment Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checidng Fees.
v/ 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structurll
1. Provide coml;)liance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / /
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be macle to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / ./
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage clisC<)sat facilities shall be removed, filiacl and/or Cal:Ced to comDly with the ./ / .
Unitorm Plurrd:)ing Code and Uniform Bui~ Cocia.
4. Underground on-site utilllies are to be located and shown on building plans Su13mitted for ./ /
K. Gracllng
'v/ 1. Grading of the Subiect property shall be in accordartce with the Uniform Building Code, C~ / /
Grading StarlClal~is, and ICC~lXed grading practi~$. The firtal grading plan shall be in
substantial confom,ance wah the alXXOv~ grading plan.
v/ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calilomia to / /
3. The develo13ment is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Distuft~nce .... / ./
Permit is required. Please contact San BernarcIlno Courly Del:)arthte~ ot Agrtcullure at (714)
387-2111 lot permit al:Clioltion. Docurnenlalion o! such pernd shall be Sul:)mitted to the City
prior to the issuance o! rough grading permit.
4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualiliecl engineer or geoiogist and Sut)mittecI at ./ /
the time of a13Pl~ion for grading plan check.
/ 5. The~rm~grading~:)~ansshal~becom~3ietedanda~:)pr~ved~3tiort~iSsuartr~e~fbuildingpermits~ / /
b. ~e e~~ ~r s~e d~ ~ dmi~ w~er th~ am ~~ o~ / /
or over ~m ~, am to ~ ~,~.~ a~ ~~ ~ t~ ~m~n of t~
~i~ a~ ~e~ D~ ~ to l~a~ ~ ~ a~ ~i~ ~.
c. ~e dmi~ i~ve~ms, ~~ for ~e~ a~ ~t~i~ t~ ~~ / /
~~, ~ to ~ i~al~ p~r to i~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~~n u~n
any ~1 ~t ~y ~ ~ ~ d~ f~ e~, ~, or ~hin a ~1
d. ~1 g~ ~ for e~ ~1 am m ~ ~~ ~ me ~i~ ~ S~ / /
D~n ~r ~v~ ~rto ~~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~. (~s ~y ~ on an
i~al or ~Me ~.)
e. All s~ ~ in ext. ~ 5 f~ in ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~h n~ g~ses / /
or ~ ~h ~m ~ver ~r ems~ ~mml ~ ~~n ~ ~ or ~ ~er
~. tn ~R~ a ~~ i~ s~ ~ ~ ~. ~is ~emem
~ ~ m~m t~ ~~~r from ~~ ~h ~ ~ ~mi~
r~im~m of ~ 17.~.~0 1 ol t~ ~~~ ~.
APPUCANT ~4'IALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 9~8-1~ FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I_ Dec~.k:atlon .~1 Vehloulmr Acce~
1. RigNs.of-way ~ easements shall be cle~ecl to the City for all interior public / /
oommunity trails. public pasoos. publio ~ areas. ,treet trees, and public drainage
facilities as $hovm on the ~ and/or tertt~tive m~. F)dvIte easenlerlll for non-public
facilities (cross-lot drainage, Iocll feeder trills, etc.) shall be reserved as slx)wn on the plans
ancVor tentmive map.
2. Dedication shall be made of lhe follcwin0 dONs-of-way on Ihe perilTinier streets / /
(measured horn ,lreet centerline):
tolal feet on
total let on
total feet on
total feet on
3. An irrevoclble offer of dedication for -foot wr,:le roadwly elserant shall be made / /
for all private streets or ddves.
4. Non-vehicular mss shall be dedicated to the City for the ~ ,Ueets: / /
5. Recipg)cal aocess easements $lmll be providm:l ensuring access 1o all parcels by CC&Rs / /
or I:)y deecis and sh811 be re(x)Kled ooncurrentty with the map or prior tO the Issuance of
Icxjilding permits, where no map is involved.