The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995/06/21 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 21, 1995 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lain, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander Biane , Curatalo Gutierre;z , and Williams , B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamafion to the Cucamonga Bad Girls Basketball Team congratula~ng bhem for their Southern California Championship and wishing them success at the National Championship. Presentation of Proclamation to Dean Smothers recognizing his years of service to the community. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time end place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. Request by GeorQe Kuvkendall, President of San Antonio Community Hospital. to address the City Council on the DinDosed San Bernardino County Medical Center D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: Apdl 5, 1995 (Regular Meeting) May 17, 1995 May 18, 1995 June 1, 1995 June 2, 1995 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/24/95, 5/31/95 and 6/7/95; and Payroll ending 6/1/95 for the total amount of $2,132,620.03. City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE , , , Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 1995. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Beer and Wine Import and Wholesale for International Import & Distributing, Domenic F. Sarzotti, 8358 Maple Place, Suite A. Approval to create Page II Classification for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Approval of temporary variance of the Sports Field Light Policy for Alta Loma Little League Tournament July 5 through July 19, 1995. Approval of the 1994/95 AB 2788 Maintenance of Effort Cerlffication, Public Safety Augmentation Fund. RESOLUTION NO. 95-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ITS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 2788 (PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUND) Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 94-21, located on the east side of Toronto Avenue, north of Seventh Street, submitted by John W. WKler. RESOLUTION NO. 95-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-21 . RESOLUTION NO. 95-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 94-21 Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO95-019) with Agajanian and Assodations for the preparation of a Commercial Land Use and Market Study, Not to Exceed $45,900.00, to be funded $30,000 from Account No. 014353-6028 for Fiscal Year 1994/95 and $15,900 from Account No. 01-4353-6028 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. 21 24 26 27 28 29 32 City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE 10. 11. 12. 13. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO95-020) for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, to Hovey Electric for the amount of $97,735.00 ($88,850.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4637-9401. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO95-021) for 1994/95 F~cal Year Pavement Rehabilitation Program Phase II Improvement Project, at Vadous Locations, to Laird Construction for the amount of $555,923.50 ($505,385.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account Nos. 01-4640-9400 and 10-4637-9113. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO95-022) for Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhoed Center Improvements, to be funded from CDBG Account No. 28-4333-9105, to the Apparent Low Bidder to be determined at the bid opening scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, June 15, 1995. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO95-023) for the Construclion of a Bus Bay on the North Side of Arrow Route West of Haven Avenue, to be funded from AQMD Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044, to the Apparent Low Bidder to be determined at the bid opening scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 21, 1995. 37 40 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBUC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meetingto receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01. ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG 4TH STREET; 1.600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION USING RULE 20-A FUNDS City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG 4TH STREET, 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 4TH STREET, USING RULE 20-A FUNDS CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CIWMP) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY - The County of San Bernardino has prepared a Countywide Siting Element and Countywide Summary Plan as part of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). The Countywide Siting Element identifies where the County will obtain disposal capacity for the next 15 years. The Countywide Summary Plan summarizes local solid waste management practices and waste divetalon programs and identifies programs and facili~es that can be utilized on a cooperative basis. RESOLUTION NO. 95-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE COUNTYVVIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CIWMP) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street, east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street, east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. 47 48 City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change th~ land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street, east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 24 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) -APN: 209-062-01. RESOLUTION NO. 95-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01A, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01 RESOLUTION NO. 95-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-O1, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01 RESOLUTION NO. 95-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 REMOVING FROM THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP 1.38 ACRES DESIGNATED INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 17) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01 72 75 78 City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS AND USES, PAVILION CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION, ATM INSTALLATION. OPEN AIR MARKET/FLEA MARKET. AND PROFESSIONAL BOXING (Oral Report) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing item, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. UPDATE BY MARKS CABLEVISION ON CABLE T.V. SERVICE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED SPLITTING OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION 3. UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY 81 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identirmd for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda June 21, 1995 PAGE L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.8, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE; VALLEY BASEBALL AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT EXECUTNE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO A GOALS WORKSHOP TO BE HELD ON JUNE 27, 1995 AT 5:00 P.M., IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE CIVIC CENTER. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby cerlify bhat a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 15, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 19, 1995 William I. Alexander, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 San Antonio Community Hospital Dear Bill: Each day brings additional news of financial crises at the national, state and local level. For those of us who are residents of San Bernardino County, we face a particularly disturbing development.. . the plan to build a replacement county hospital. It is my belief that the proposed county hospital is not only not needed but, if built, has all the potential for bankrupting the County of San Bernardino. The impact of such a disaster will be shouldered by the cities in the County and, ultimately, by the taxpayers. I would like an opportunity to address the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga so that each Council Member may be aware of the likely impact of replacing the county hospital. George A. Kuykendall President GAK:jsv / g99 San Bernara~no Road, Upland, California 91786,909/985-2811 Approvea by the Joint Com, m~ss~on on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations DISCUSSION FOR THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW IS CONTAINED IN THE MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 5, 1995 SPECIAL MEETING WHICH WAS HELD AT 6:00 P.M. April 5, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 5, 1995, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Karen Matcham, Recreation Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Manager, Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Shirr'l Griffin, Secretary; Joi Simpson, Office Specialist II; Jill Ecoff, Records Clerk; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring Apdl 5, 1995 as Records Management Day. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 9 through 15, 1995 as National Library Week celebrating the theme "Americans Can't Wait." Mayor Alexander left at 6:42 p.m. City Council Minutes April 5, 1995 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC C1. Don Donnelly of Rancho Cucamonga stated he felt the citizens are concerned about the utility tax and the Council's commitment to changing it. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/15/95 for the total amount of $355,413.23. D2. Approval of Extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D3. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Calaveras Avenue Street Improvements between Ninth Street and Arrow Route and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 95-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT FOR CALAVERAS AVENUE BETWEEN NINTH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE D4. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 2 for Tract No. 14208, located on the north side of Base Line Road west of AIta Cuesta Drive, submitted by Mr. Ralph G. Rittenhouse. RESOLUTION NO. 95-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14208, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 95-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR TRACT 14208 City Council Minutes Apdl 5, 1995 Page 3 D5. Approval to order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 6 for CUP 94-37, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of 4th Street, submitted by Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 95-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 94-37 (APN 210- 071-56) D6. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 95-013) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Wells Fargo Guard Service for providing security at the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park and Quakes Stadium. D7. Approval to accept the Milliken Avenue Extension between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route Project, Contract No. 94-044, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,488,860.72. RESOLUTION NO. 95-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D8. Approval to accept the Milliken Avenue Grade Separation, Slope and Drainage Modification Project, Contract No. 94-075, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $89,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION, SLOPE AND DRAINAGE MODIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D9. Approval to accept the Salina Avenue Street Improvements between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue Project, Contract No. 94-076, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $179,383.30. RESOLUTION NO. 95-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SALINA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes April 5, 1995 Page 4 No items were submitted. No items were submitted. No items were submitted. No items were submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCI=S F. ADVERTISED PUBIIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H, CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF REPORTS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. RFQUEST FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCF TO PRFSENT A RFSOLUTION RFGARDING THF UTILITY USFR'S FFF J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MFFTING Councilmember Curatalo stated he would like a report from staff about the impact the Ontario Mills J1. Stores will have on the City. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes ~,pril 5, 1995 Page 5 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adjoum. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. (Note: the Executive Session to discuss Labor Negotiations will be discussed at the next meeting). Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: May 17, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ReGular Meetin~l A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 17, 1995, in the Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manger; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Miki Bratt, Associate Planner; Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; James Frost, City Treasurer; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Marli Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Jana Ellis, Disaster Preparedness Specialist; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, and Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Proclamation declaring May as Older Americans Month. Proclamation presented to Don Carroll, President of the VIP Club. Mr. Carroll thanked the Council for their support of the senior citizens. B2. Presentation of Proclamation designating May 22 as Math Day in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Paul Ward, Diane Murphy and Sarah Sagoon of Rancho Cucamonga High School. Paul Ward thanked the Coundl for the proclamation and invited everyone to the Math Fair to be held Monday, May 22. City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 2 B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Alberta Wormdahl recognizing her for her Dedication in Promoting Disaster Preparedness. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Alberta Wormdahl. Alberta Wormdahl thanked the Council for this honor. B4. Presentation of Proclamation to Chaffey Joint Union High School Distdct for their Participation in Promoting Disaster Preparedness in the City. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Diane Allen. Diane Allen thanked the Council and Marti Higgins and Jana Ellis for the work they do with this program. B5. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the week of May 21 - 27, 1995 as National Public Works Week. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Joe O'Neil. A recess was taken at 7:51 Councilmembers present. C1. C2. C3. p.m. Mayor Alexander called the meeting back to order at 8:09 p.m. with all C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Nate Viswanathan complimented Capt. Ron Bieberdorf and his staff for the work they do. John Van Doren, 11186 Corsica, stated he would like more information on the CERT program and felt it was ven/beneficial. He stated he would like to be able to see minutes of a previous Council meeting before each meeting starts. He stated he hoped that the Council could advise the public as to what monies are being appropriated from Item D9. Tony Mize, 10390 Commerce Center Drive, commented on the Habitat for Humanity Program and the work that was going on with that. He thanked the RDA for (heir assistance on this project. He stated he would like to have a meeting with the City Manager about volunteers for this project. Councilmember Biane asked about the dates for this project. Tony Mize stated the actual Jimmy Carter work week in which 50 houses are going to be built throughout Southern California in a week is June 17 to 24. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manger, stated there are corrections to Item D9 as indicated in the revised staff report distributed. He also commented to Mr. Van Doren that each year about this time the Council adopts an amendment to the budget. This means that all of the revenues are updated after the first half of the Fiscal Year, and that Coundl actions taken this past year are included in the amended budget. There are no expenditures in there other than those that have been already acted upon by the City Council publicly. He stated the drops City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 3 in the property tax revenue are a result of the Assessor's actions. He stated the two major expenditures on this is the payment of the Booking Fees that we owe the County as a result of the court settlement. He stated the other is the $300,000 Law Enforcement Reserve that must now be placed back into the Police Contract which was stipulated in budget hearings last year. Coundlmember Biane asked why on the revenue side is there $791,000 more than was budgeted and where is that money being spent. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated over $300,000 was from the Police Reserve that is being moved over and the other $300,000 plus is from the Booking Fees Resen~e that was set aside a number of years ago in anticipation of the court settlement. D1. Approval of Minutes: March 15, 1995 March 22, 1995 April 5, 1995 (Special Meeting) April 19, 1995 May 3, 1995 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/3/95 for the total amount of $1,070,051.86. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of Apdl 30, 1995. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General, Holiday Wine & Spirit Company, Tara and Tarshinder Dhillon, 10451 Lemon Avenue Suite A. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Establishment, No name given for business, Jaruwan Chuwatthanakul and Nives Kamnuanmasok, 8038 Haven Avenue #A. D6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of a bus bay on the north side of Arrow Route, just west of Haven Avenue, to be funded from Fund 14 Air Quality Improvement Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044. RESOLUTION NO. 95-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRU~.,TION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, JUST WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D7. Approval to reject all bids for the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Rehabilitation as non- responsive to the needs of the City and authorize staff to immediately re-bid the project. D8. Approval to appropriate $20,000.00 from Fund 14, Air Quality Improvement Grant for construction of a bus bay on the north side of Arrow Route just west of Haven Avenue. D9. Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1994/95 Appropriations. D10. Approval of Resol~ons of Inducement for various housing projects. (Continued from May 3, 1995) City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,-DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MOUNTAINSIDE APARTMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 95-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE SYCAMORE SPRINGS APARTMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 95-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MONTEREY VILLAGE APARTMENTS D11. Approval of co-sponsoring High School All-Star game with Quakes and Daily Bulletin to benefit the "Send an Underprivileged Kid to Camp" program. D12. Approval to authorize the Engineering Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to submit to SAN BAG projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1996/2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. D13. Approval of the Environmental Ini'dal Study Parts I and II for the Roadway Widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 95-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROADWAY WIDENING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE-FOURTH STREET INTERSECTION D14. Approval to purchase one (1) Conventional Truck Cab-Chassis Schwarze Model 7,000 Air Street Sweeper from Road Machinery Incorporated of Chino, California, in the amount of $119,944.39 to be funded from General Fund Account No. 01-4645-7045. D15. Approval of the installation of two baseball scoreboards at Heritage Community Park, requested and funded by the Alta Loma Little League. D16. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Disposition of City owned property adjacent to Santa Clars Court and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 2 for Tract 14116, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Sheffield-Alta Loma 55, Ltd. City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 95-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 14116, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 95-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14116 RESOLUTION NO. 95-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN D17. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 95-015) for Bike Lockers and Racks at Civic Center, City Yard and Metrolink Stalion for the amount of $17,462.50 ($15,875.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Air Quality Management Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044 to Trautwein Construction. D18. Approval to set a Public Headng for June 21, 1995, to consider establishment of an Underground Utility District along Archibald Avenue and along Fourth Street, 1,600 feet north and south of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street, using Rule 20A Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 95-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG FOURTH STREET; 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET: USING RULE 20A FUNDS MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar, including the corrections for Item D9. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items were submitted. City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATE PLAN, THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1995/96 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN - The review and adoption of the Federally required Consolidated Plan which covers the five-year period for FY 1995-1999, the Annual Action Plan for FY 1995/96, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a grant of $1,024,000 and $37,644 in Program Income, and review of required amendments to the City's Federal Citizens' Participation Plan. (Continued from May 3, 1995) Staff report presented by Cindy Nords, Associate Planner. Councilmember Curatalo thanked the City for the work that was done on this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to get together with staff in about one month to go over the policy for this program. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Zion Thompson, of the Boys and Girls Club, thanked the Council for their donation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 95-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN INCLUDING THE FINAL SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN MOTION: Moved by Gutjerrez, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 95-068. Motion carried 4-0-0- 1 (Williams abstained). Councilmember Williams stated she was abstaining because of her association with one of the organizations. F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 02A - 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Government Cede, a revision and update of the city's Housing Element, including the State- mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units, at risk of conversion to market rate, through June 30, 2004. Staff report presented by Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public headng was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 95-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02A, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 7 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 95-081. unanimously, 5-0. G1. Motion carded G. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON CHURCH STREET FROM PEPPER STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON MORNING PLACE AND VINTAGE DRIVE FROM BANYAN STREET TO MILLIKEN AVENUE Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about Banyan between Milliken and Haven and the speed limits that are set there. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, stated the Engineering Division keeps a survey for about five years unless there are major changes with the street. Councilmember Gutierrez asked how much discretion the City has for stop signs. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, stated there are state requirements that the City must follow and that sometimes stop signs are not obeyed and are not effective. He stated there are a lot of conditions to consider for a stop sign. Mayor Alexander stated he has a problem with the speed limit on Church between Pepper and Haven. He stated he hates it that the speed limit is determined by how fast drivers are going on a street. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public headng. Addressing the Council was: Jim Frost stated that possibly the speed limit on Church could be lowered as it was on Base Line in front of the high school several years ago. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 540. ORDINANCE NO. 540 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 540 and set second reading for June 7. Councilmember Williams felt this should be tried for a period of time and then come back with an update. Mayor Alexander stated he had a problem voting for anything other than 35 mph on Church. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that on page 224, Item 16, the speed limit could be changed to 35 mph instead of 40 mph. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with this and that Item 45 should remain at 35 mph also. City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 540 and include the changes as stated above and set second reading for June 7. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES TO HELP PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council was: Gary Christian, Chamber of Commerce, stated he enjoyed partidpating in this project and commended the City for the recommendation. He thanked the City for allowing the Chamber to give input on this project. Councilmember Biane asked Duane Baker to comment on what he has heard from store owners about this ordinance. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated they are concerned about how this will be enforced. He stated they have been cooperative in helping the City accomplish something. Councilmember Williams asked what it would cost to retroffi for this. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated about $500 for the camera, which would go up in cost if they wanted to enhance the equipment. Councilmember Williams asked if insurance companies will give a cost break if a business does have a camera. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated he would follow up and find out about that. Councilmember Williams stated there are a lot of other types of stores that are open late at night and asked if the City was going to do the same type of program for them. She felt the Chamber might be able to pass out information to the small businesses. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve staffs recommendation. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. Mayor Alexander asked that California Grocers also be contacted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander stated he has been contacted by the City of Upland regarding Highland to try to work cooperatively on this project. He asked if there was any input from the public. There being no response, public input was closed. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes May 17, 1995 Page 9 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code 54956.8, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Rochester Avenue; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Parties, regarding Terms of Payment; and for Executive Session to adjourn to a Budget Workshop on May 18, 1995, at 4:00 p.m. in the Tri- Communi'des Conference Room. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: May 18,1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency, and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, May 18, 1995, in the Tri Communities Room, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. by Mayor Alexander. Present were members: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager: Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Sandy Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Bob Valenti, Accountant; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Administrative Services Officer Alex Ahumada, Deputy Fire Marshall Ralph Crane, Deputy Chief Bob Corcoran, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Ron Bieberdoff, Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM(S) OF DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR 1995/96 FISCAL YEAR Jack Lam made presentation on the proposed 1995~96 fiscal year budgets as was included in the budget document. He continued to talk about each department and what programs they would be involved in for the 1995/96 fiscal year. He stated a plan to reduce the Utility Tax will be completed in about two weeks for the Council's consideration. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he appreciated Jack Lam's presentation, but added that he is committed to making the employees happy to work here. He stated all of the employees will not be forgotten. He felt the City should continue working with businesses to get "quality" sales tax revenue. He felt quality public safety was also important. He stated he felt this was a tough budget and wanted to make sure it worked and to try to cut the Utility Tax. City Council Minutes May 18, 1995 Page 2 Councilmember Williams stated she had a couple of line item questions from some of the departments, but would work with them individually for now to get her questions answered. She felt the budget was a piece of work. She felt the City should continue working with legislators, and added she thought staff has done a phenomenal job with the budget preparation. She felt there were some cuts that had to be made, but that everyone seemed willing to make things work. Mayor Alexander stated he really did not have many questions at this time. He told the public that were present that the staff worked hard to get the budget balanced. He mentioned Disaster Preparedness and the excellent service they provide to the community. He commented on new development in the area that would bring jobs to the City and help the economy. He stated it is a very good budget and put together very well. Councilmember Biane stated he appreciated everyone's work on the budget. He felt it was fair and everyone could see that the City was managing with what it had considering the positions that have not been filled, etc. He felt the City should not lose focus of the opportunities that are out there with redevelopment and economic development that could continue to increase the ability to generate sales tax or property tax revenues for the City, and provide the level and quality of services that are now provided. Councilmember Curatalo stated he agreed that Rancho Cucamonga is a quality City. He commended staff and Jack for all their hard work. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Mr. Lansdale, Sapphire, felt the City was over budgeted and could cut the budget by 5 - 10%. He felt this should be done to each department. C2. Don Donnelly, Rancho Cucamonga, felt the City needed more revenues coming in for public safety services. He felt more sales tax was needed, and that the City should be doing things to accomplish this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated the City had recently talked with Mr. Dutton to help promote the City. Councilmember Williams stated that right at this very moment City staff are at the International Council of Shopping Centers conference marketing the City. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjoum to Tuesday, May 30, 1995, 5:00 p.m. in the Td Communities Room for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 1, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Special Adjoumed Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 1, 1995 in the Tri Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:20 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were members: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager: Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Buller, City Planner; Joe O~eil, City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Administrative Services Officer Alex Ahumada, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION Mayor Alexander announced that the City Council will not be mee.ting with Assemblyman Aguiar on Friday because he will be delayed in Sacramento on business. 1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR 1995/96 FISCAL YEAR Jack Lain continued with his presentation on the proposed budget. He stated the City has just learned from Sheriff Penrod that there will be a 6% overhead charge factored into all conlracts for law enforcement services. He stated this would amount to approximately $465,000 to the City. He stated the City has told the Sheriff that we are disappointed how this is being done. He stated the City does not have any other information or anything else on this matter, but that he felt this was unfair and would be a burden on the City. He also felt this would be a breach of good faith between the County and the City. He stated he is not prepared to discuss any strategy at this point, but did want the Council to know what was coming down. Mayor Alexander asked what will happen on June 8 if there would be any alterations to the Police Department's budget before it is adopted. City Council, Redevelopment Agency, F~eProtection Dis~ictMinutes June 1,1995 Page 2 Jack Lam felt the budget should go ahead and be adopted as scheduled, but that staff will not complete all the programs in the budget until more information comes out on this additional charge by the County. He stated that on June 8, they will go ahead and approve all the budgets as proposed. Mayor Alexander brought up the travel and meetings account and felt only one or two people needed to attend a meeting or conference, and that those individuals could bring back the information for the rest of the Councilmembers. He did not see a need for everyone to attend something. He stated he would pledge to do this and asked everyone else to do the same. Jack Lain stated this year's budget is more defined as to how much money is budgeted for each event. Councilmember Willjams stated she agreed and felt every line item in the budget should really be looked at before spending the money. Jack Lam continued his presentation by talking about the Utility Tax model as was outlined in his staff report. Councilmember Curatalo stated he wanted to make sure that everyone above the $50,000 amount will get tax relief. Councilmember Biane asked when people would see a difference once the reduction is put in place. Jack Lain stated fiscal year 1996/97, and that if audits are received in October, 1997, it would occur then. He stated staff urges that the Council adopt the Resolution for the tax reduction. Councilmember Williams suggested that a questionnaire go out with the business license renewal notices as to how many users are paying between $20,000 to $50,000. Jack Lain stated staff could certainly do this. Councilmember Williams stated along with reducing the tax, that the City doesn't keep adding new programs if there is no money to pay for them. Mayor Alexander stated he totally agreed. Councilmember Biane stated he agreed with what Councilmember Williams was saying. Councilmember Curatalo stated he hoped this is what the City has been doing. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt all the departments have sacrificed in order to hold the line with the budget. He stated he resented this new mandate on police services by the County. Councilmember Curatalo asked if the City could go ahead and take a stand tonight to oppose this. Jack Lain stated it could come back at next week's meeting so the Council could take action. City CounciFRedevelopment Agency/F~eProtection Dis~i~Minutes June 1,1995 Page 3 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Gary Christian, President of the Chamber of Commerce, stated the Utility Tax has a different affect on businesses than it does on residents. He brought up that it is almost 50/50 between residents and businesses make up the split on the tax. He stated the Chamber does like the plan, but did not feel they would see relief for about 18 months. He stated he was concerned whatever the plan is. He did applaud Jack Lam and the staff. C2. Ede Swistock, Chamber of Commerce, stated he first wanted to comment on companies revealing what they are paying because he felt it would be a problem because of the competitiveness issue. He stated if you look at a company's electric bill you would know how busy they are, etc. He felt 50% would go over much better than the 25%. He did not think the ratio of business/residential was 50/50, but rather about 60/40. He stated the City Council needs to keep working on things to help the business community, but does appreciate what they are doing. Mayor Alexander asked if the Utility Tax could be adjusted at any time. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it could be adjusted at any time. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to adjourn the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire Protection District Board to Thursday, June 8, 1995, 5:00 p.m. in the Tri Communities Room located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia for the purpose of adopting their budgets, and for the City Council to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjoumed at 6:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 2, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adiourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was scheduled to be held on Friday, June 2, 1995, in the Rains Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, at 7:30 a.m. Due to lack of quorum, the meeting was adjourned. City Clerk Approved: o 0 .0 o 0 · w ~o V V · V v~ ~ 0 J '~ I · · · I t I t!~ I ,t · · t I II e I · t · II , % u_k~laJ .j z · ~ z z J ~e"dlb ,I )"' We 'J, - I · r :l ,d ~ Itz~ouu,~.-az4z~zz · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ,1 · I ^ ~ IIItl I I,- W · i Z · · · · · · · · · · · · · t · · · · · · · · ¢ · · I · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I · · · % · I I,,,,I ~1~1 OI ]1 I Z I 131 I I I I I I lZl I~1 I~1 I I I~1 INI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~1 IZl IZl I I I I~1 I · w 06/12/1995 CITY OF RAK1]O CUCAI4OMA PM - 1 PORTFOLIO MASTER SS~ARY CITY MAY 31, 1995 CASE AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERM MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank ............... $ Local Agency Investaent Funds ................ $ Bankers Acceptances .......................... $ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ............... $ Treasury S~mrities - Coupon ................. $ Treasury Securities - Discount ............... $ Mortgage Backed Securities ................... $ Small Bus. Aria/Miscellaneous Agency .......... $ TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVERAGES ........... C~SH 13,419,566.50 24.74 466 339 5.837 5.918 10,212,819.24 18.83 1 I 5.876 5.957 4,976,977.80 9.17 28 0 5.947 6.030 19,450,915.63 35.86 1,049 901 7.123 7.222 272,845.00 0.50 1,180 822 6.569 6.660 1,437,795.60 2.65 364 28 5.242 5.314 376,169.73 0.69 6,447 3,564 8.937 9.061 4,101,562.50 7.56 2,720 1,839 6.879 6.975 ..$ 54,248,652.00 100.00% 760 576 6.404% 6.493% Passb~k/Checkinq Accounts ................... $ 926,979.73 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase ................. $ 98,698.01 TOTAL CASH and PUI{Cq{ASE INTEREST ............. $ 1,025,677.74 TOTAL CASH and INVESTMIH{TS ................. $ 55,274,329.74 NON]q{ ENDING FISCAL TOTAL EARNINGS MAY 31 YF.A]{ TO DATE Current Year $ 289,015.64 $ 2,342,449.06 AVERAGE DAILY ~ EFFECTIVE RATE OF RE~q3RN $ 55,077,439.37 $ 0.00 6.18% 0.00% DATE I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and is in comformity with investment policy adopted July 20, 1994. A copy of this investment policy is available in the Finance Division of the AdministratiVe Services Departmet. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures. 06/1211995 CITY OF RANCBO CIICAI~A INVE,.~NEIff PORT~LIO D~AII3 - INVESTEITS MAY 31, 1995 l~l- 2 CITY I]~STNEIr AVERAGE P~IASE STATED ---YTN--- MATURITY DAYS NI~R ISSUER ~ DA~ ~ V~UE FACE VaE ~ V~UE ~TE 3~ 365 DATE ~ ~T CERTIFICATES OF DEi:'OSIT - BANK 80942 BANK OF AMEI~ICA 04/04/95 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 2.800 2.800 2.839 06/06/95 5 00944 BANK OF AMERICA 05/04/95 127,921.00 127,921.(M) 127,921.00 2.900 2.900 2.9~ 06/05/95 4 (X)937 ~ILL I1{1)~ BAXK 04/06/95 2,000,0(X).00 2,000,000.00 2,(XX,O00.O0 7.180 7.082 7.180 04/09/97 678 00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.0{) 4.600 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 74 00918 GREAT WESTERN 11/15/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 11/27/95 179 00927 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 01/25/96 238 00930 GREAT WESTElfiN 02/15/95 5(N),O00.O0 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 08/16/96 442 00931 GREAT WESTERN 03/01/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,050.00 6.250 6.250 6.337 03/04/96 277 00932 GREAT WESTERN 02/23/95 1,500,000.00 1,5(M),O00.O0 1,500,000.00 6.750 6.750 6.844 08/21/95 81 00936 GREAT WESTERN 03/29/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.800 5.800 5.8~1 09/25/95 116 00924 SAIfWA 12/28/94 1,O00,OOO.O0 1,000,000.00 1,O~O,O00.O0 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 575 00933 SANWA 02/23/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 634 00945 SANWA 05/02/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,0~.00 2,000,000.00 6.410 6.410 6.499 05/02/97 701 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 13,419,566.50 13,419,566.50 13,419,566.50 13,419,566.50 5.837 5.918 339 ~ AGENCY I~TMIHIT { 0(X15 IIICAI, AGENCY IIVST FUND 0(004 I/)C. AL AGEIfCY I~ST FUND SUBTOTALS ~ AVERAGES 13,397,657.95 9,099,819.24 9,099,819.24 9,099,819.24 5.960 5.878 5.960 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 5.934 5.853 5.934 10,212,819.24 10,212,819.24 10,212,819.24 5.876 5.957 I BANKERS ACCEPTANCES 00946 SUMITOI40 EANK NY 05/04/95 AVERAGES 4,495,334.79 4,976,9T'/.80 5,000,000.(X) 5,000,000.00 5.920 5.947 6.o~o o6/ol/95 FEDERAl, AGENCY ISSUES - COOPOll 00895 FEDERAl, FAIU! CRIH)IT BAlIKS 04/29/94 0{)897 FEDEP.),L FARM CREDIT { 05/05/94 00922 FEDERAL IN31{E LOA!{ BI3[ 12/19/94 00925 FEDERAL HOWE LOAN BA~ 12/28/94 00939 FEDERAL BOWl LOAN Ba!{ 04/06/95 OO940 FEDERAL IK)E LOAIEA![ 04/06195 00943 FEDERAL BONE LO~EA![ 04/26/95 00938 00949 O0921 00926 00935 00947 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES FEDERAL m3E LOaS NOnT~. CO 04106195 FEDERAL l{Oe{E MAIl I!O!fiYL CO 05/16/95 FEDERAL MATL MTG ASSil 12/21/94 FEDERAL I~!TL ~ ~ 12/29/94 FEDERAL MATE WrG ASS! 03/22/95 FEDERAL MATE MTG ASSm 05108195 17,902,528.53 2,0(X),000.00 2,0~,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 1,996,250.00 2,0(X),000.00 1,996,250.00 5.850 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,O00,(MX.O0 8.030 1,065,134.38 1,09{),{)00.00 1,065,134.38 6.360 ~5,1~.25 1,00{),0{30.00 ~5,1~.25 4.570 942,968.75 1,000,000.00 942,908.75 5.240 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 8.045 1,002,031.25 1,000,000.00 1,002,031.25 7.420 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 7.050 1,981,250.00 2,00),000.00 1,981,250.00 7.050 1,~8,125.00 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 7.700 54){),000.00 500,000.(X) 500,O(N).O0 7.010 1,54){),00{).0{) 1,50{),000.00 1,500,000.00 7.270 19,450,915.63 19,450,915.63 19,590,000.00 5.770 5.850 5.870 5.952 8.030 8.142 7.789 7.898 6.727 6.821. 7.030 7.].27 8.045 8.157 7.226 7.326 7.050 7.148 7.564 7.669 7.752 7.859 7.010 7.107 7.270 7.371 7.123 7.222. 04/29/96 04/29/96 12/19/97 09/19/95 1213O/96 n/3o/9$ 04/26/00 {)9/23/9<) o5/15/98 lo/lo/~6 12/1o/96 o3/21/97 333 333 932 476 578 1,278 1,791 1,575 1,079 497 558 659 1,803 06/12/1995 CITY OF P,~ CU~ R~ - 3 INVEST~ ~RTFOLIO DETAIL~ - I~~ ~Y 31, 1995 INVESTMENT AVERAGE PURCHASE STATED ---YTN--- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSOER BALANCE DATE BOX VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE MATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT TREASURY SECURITIES - COLON 00903 TREASURY NOTE AVERAGES 06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.569 6.660 08/31/97 822 272,845.00 TREASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00907 TREASURY BILL AVERAGES 06/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,509,061.20 5.040 5.242 5.314 06/29/95 28 1,437,795.60 MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/23/87 00203 FEDERAL NATL WIG ASSN 09/21/87 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG A 07/01/87 00069 GOVERNMEleT MATIONAL MORTG A 07/01/87 SUBTOTAL~ and AVERAGES 381,291.35 68,866.45 70,701.54 442,907.10 8.000 149,667.47 162,021.62 612,753.80 8.500 131,559.60 133,393.76 663,389.28 8.500 26,076.21 25,561.97 84,710.58 9.000 376,169.73 1,803,760.76 391,678.89 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,406 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,571 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,175 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,114 8.937 9.061 3,564 SMALL BUS. ADM/MISCEI/INEOUS AGENCY 00950 FEDERAL IK)ME LOAN BANK 05/15/95 00004 SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN 07/25/86 SUBTOTALS and AVEPAGES 2,746,723.79 3,0OO,O00.GO 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 6.400 6.400 6.489 05/15/96 349 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.00 1,065,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 5,898 4,101,562.50 4,065,142.39 4,000,000.00 6.879 6.975 1,839 TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVG. $ 54,248,652.00 55,734,110.72 54,053,743.51 54,406,064.63 6.404% 6.493% 576 06/12/1995 CITY O[ RANCBOCUCAMONGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - CASi{ MAY 31, 1995 INVESTMENT AVERAGE PURCHASE STATED --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE EATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHE~IM/SAVI~ ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF AMERICA AVEPAGES 1,023,695.86 Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS 926,979.73 2.000 1.973 2.000 98,698.01 $ 55,077,439.37 55,274,329.74 06/12/1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUC~A R{ - 5 PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITYBY TYPE CITY MAY 1, 1995 - MAY 31, 1995 CASH STATED ~SACTION PURt'q{ASES SALES/RATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT { ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITMI)RAWA.[,S BALAM(IE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK BEGINNIM BA.LAI~'E: ~941 ~ OF MICA 2.800 05/04/1995 127,921.00 00944 BANK OF AMERICA 2.900 05/04/1995 127,921.00 00894 SANWA 4.250 05/02/1995 2,000,0(N).00 00945 SA~dA 6.410 05/02/1995 2,000,000.00 SUBTOTALS and E]fl)ING BALANCE 2,127,921.00 2,127,921.00 13,419,566.5<) 13,419,566.50 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMERT FUNDS (Monthly Summary) O(X)05 LOCAL AGENCY I~ST FUND 5.960 00804 L(r. AL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.934 SUBT(YrALS and ENDING BALAMCE 6,270,000.00 BEGINNIE BALAI~'E: 12,400,000.00 16,342,819.24 6,270,000.00 12,400,004).00 10,212,819.24 CHE(IING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (Monthly Summary) ~180 BANI[ OF AMERICA BEGINNIN(i ~: 1,709,700.00 2,525,000.00 1,742,279.73 926,979.73 ACCRPTAM<IES 00946 SUMITOMO BAMK MY 5.920 05/04/1995 BEGINNI~ {: 4,976,977.80 0.00 4,976,977.80 FEDERAL AGENCY I~UES - COUPON 00896 FEI)ERAL FARM CREI)IT BANKS 5.160 00949 FEDERAL l{O{{E LOAM MORT{2. CORP. 7.050 0{~947 FEI)ERAI, NAIL )[~G ~N 7.270 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 05/01/1995 05/16/1995 05/~/1995 B~IHING BAI.ANGE: 1,500,000.00 16,950,915.63 4,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 19,450,915.63 TREASURY SECURITIES - COOPON TREASIIRY SECURITIES - DISCOON'[ BEGINNIINS BALANCE: BEGINNING BALAMCE: 272,845.00 272,845.0<) 1,437,795.60 1,437,795.60 MORTGAGE BA~EI) SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL I{OWE LOAN BANK 00203 FEI)ERAI. BIL M'I'G ~ 05/xs/ss 05/2s/gs BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,223.25 4,761.37 387,230.36 Z7 06/12/1995 CITY OF RANCHO~ PORTFOLIONA~T~ INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE MAY 1, 1995 - NAY 31, 1995 CITY CASB STATED TRANSACTION I~KNISES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INV~TMENT ~ ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEllITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALA~E 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL NORTG ASSN 8.500 05/18/95 1,147.99 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ~ 9,000 05/03/95 3,928.02 S~TOTALS and ENDING BA/.JalCE O.GO 11,060.63 376,169.73 SMALL BUS. AI)M/MISCEI,LANEOUS AGENCY 00950 FEDERAL H(31IE MAN BANK TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE:$ BEGINNIIIG BALAJICE: 1,101,562.50 6.400 05/15/1995 3,000,000.00 4,101,562.50 51,655,014.56 22,084,598.80 18,563,981.63 55,175,631.73 TO: Deparanent of Alcoholic Beverage Control 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 C'ALIfOINIA APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) File N~ber ............ 30?963 Receipt Number ......... 1031674 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 04-26-95 Issued Date RIVERSIDE INTERNATION','~ LE DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County ls premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (!f different from premise address) ff promise licensed: Type of Ucense Transferor' s ,names/license: License TVDe IMPORT & DISTRIBUTING 8358 MAPLE PL STE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES 6028 KIRKWOOD AVE ALTA LOMA CA 91737 CA 'RECEIVED 917~1'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,~ CITY CL~PK APR 2 7 1995 516! Transac:ion Tvne Fee TYPe Master DUD Date Fee 1. 09 BEER AND WINE IMPO ORIGINAL NA YES 0 APR 26,1995 $.00 2.17 BEER AND WINE WHOL ORIGINAL NA YES 0 APR 26,1995 $100.00 3. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 APR 26,1995 $39.00 4. 17 BEER AND WINE WHOL ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 26,1995 $72.00 TOTAL $211.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Comrol convicted of a felony? NO Control Act, or regulations of the depatZment pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pail of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and Co) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date APR 26,1995 Under penaJty of perjury. each person whose signatur~ appears below, ceru~es and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants. or an executive offic~ of the applicant coq~oraUon, named in the foregoing applicauon. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and k~ows the contents ~ert'of and that each of the above statemores therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or appUcants has any direct or indite1 interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this applicauon is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to saUsfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agtgement entered into more than ninety {90) days preceding the day on which the transfer appljcauon is filled with the Depattn~nt or to gain or establish a pref ce to or for any ~tor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of tansfear. (5) that the transfer application may be wmthckawn by eid~cr the applicant or ~c-en-~e with nt~ mesuhing iiability Io t2,,: Depatlment. · ant Name(s). Applicant Signature(s) ' ABC 211 (9/93) f DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CREATION OF PAGE H CLASSIFICATION RECOM1VIENDATION Approve creation of personnel classification Page II for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library with a pay range of $6.85 - $8.79. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Currently, approximately 12 Pages are employed by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, scheduled throughout the 59 hour service week. Beginning July 1, 1995, Library Pages will be assuming the additional responsibilities of basic janitorial tasks as needed throughout the service day. This classification is supervised by the Circulation Supervisor, who is also responsible for the supervision of 10 part time clerks. While all Pages will remain under the direct supervision of the Circulation Supervisor, the creation of the position of Page II will provide assistance in the training, scheduling and task-follow-up for the members of the Page team. In addition, certain building maintenance tasks, such as the ordering and maintenance ofjanitorial supplies and the training of other Pages in the duties/routines of building maintenance will be assigned to this classification level. FINANCIAL IMPACT Costs: One Page lI position at 20 hrs. per week will have an annual cost of $1,540 above the cost of currently budgeted Page I. Impact: The creation of the Page II classification will have no impact on the overall budget. Costs will be absorbed by reducing the overall hours allocated to the Page classification. No new funds are f'~,uested. Library Manai~/~ :j LIBRARY PAGE II $6.85 hr/Pan Time THE POSITION Under direct supervision of Circulation Supervisor, shelve and process returned books and materials; assist in the training of Page I class in duties pertaining to orderliness of library shelves and facilities; and to provide general clerical assistance to library staff and public. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMPLES OF WORK Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: return library materials to shelves; retrieve library materials from storage areas; assist in training of other staff in shelving and building maintenance routines; assist in the inventory and ordering of maintenance supplies; clean furniture, fixtures and shelving and maintain cleanliness of reading rooms; provide emergency clean-up when necessary; prepare materials for circulation; assist in maintaining and repairing visual and sound media; provide general assistance to library patrons; may assist in checking out books, receiving and processing returned materials; may perform general clerical work; may son and distribute mail; may perform minor repairs on library materials; may prepare materials for delivery; may perform outdoor tasks raising flags, emptying outdoor book drops and picking up trash; may be required to lift heavy objects. Equivalent to completion of 12th grade. One year experience in shelving or building maintenance required. Ability to train others. Knowledge of English usage, spelling grammar and punctuation; principles of basic mathematics. Knowledge of Dewey Decimal classification. Ability to follow oral and written instructions; operate office machines and equipment; communicate effectively, both orally and in writing. Ability to file numerically and alphabetically. LIBRARY PAGE $5.37 hr/Part Time THE POSITION Shelve and process returned books and materials; assist in maintaining the orderliness of library shelves and facilities; and to provide general clerical assistance to library staff and public. Approximately 20 hours per week. Work schedule will include evenings and weekeneds. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMPLES OF WORK Duties may include, but axe not limited to, the following: return library materials to shelves; retrieve library materials from storage areas; perform a variety of messenger and errand work; clean furniture, fixtures and shelving and maintain cleanliness of reading rooms; provide emergency clean-up when necessary; prepare materials for circulation; assist in maintaining and repairing visual and sound media; may assist in checking out books, receiving and processing returned materials; provide general assistance to library patrons; may perform general clerical work; may sort and distribute mail; may perform minor repairs on library materials; may prepaxe materials for delivery; may perform outdoor tasks raising flags, emptying outdoor book drops and picking up trash; may be required to lift heavy objects. Equivalent to completion of tenth grade. Knowledge of English usage, spelling grammar and punctuation; principles of basic mathematics. Knowledge of Dewey Decimal classification. Ability to follow oral and written instructions; operate office machines and equipment; communicate effectively, both orally and in writing. Ability to file numerically and alphabetically. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2 1, 1995 TO: Mayor, Member of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF SPORT FIELD LIGHT POLICY FOR DATES JULY 5 - 19. 1995. RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends approval of a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow for light use until 11:30 p.m. on the Senior Field at Heritage Park from July 5th through July 19, 1995 ( excluding Sundays) Game times are to be 5:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. for two game nights, and 6:00 p.m. for single game nights. BACKGR6UND The current sports field light policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted. No complaints from residents have been received. Since this tournament is for older boys, play traditionally lasts 2.5. to 3 hours. In recent years the Council and Commission have approved a curfew variance only to accommodate extra inning play. ANALYSIS The requested variance would apply to only the 90 foot base path field located at the east side of Heritage Park. And staff requests theCouncil and Commission continue with their current policy of providing curfew variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings which is necessary for tournament play. Currently, one request is filed for use of the Equestrian Center. Alta Loma Riding Club will hold a local show which should end about 5:00 p.m. Therefore, staff believes no conflict of use will occur. Several picnic permits have be authorized for the park throughout this two week period. Staff believes there will be no conflict of use or parking with the baseball games. As in the past, the League is to provide the City with a draft of the notice to the neighbors a minimum of two weeks prior to the games. This notice has been required by the Commission so that surrounding neighbors are aware that a variance has been permitted by the City to accommodate play and that any questions regarding use should be addressed to the City or league representatives. Once the draft is approved, the League must distribute to the neighbors on the north and east streets which face to the park. A final tournament bracket should also be submitted to the City prior to June 29, 1995. Respectfully Submitted, ./, "2- ....l- ~- "L,,- ~,- -t,-(,, g ices Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUNDS Backt, round On June 30, 1993, the State of California authorized a one half cent sales tax to raise funds for local public safety service. These funds are held in a local public safety augmentation fund until they are dispersed to the local agency. Since 1993/94 the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been 'in receipt of augmentation funds in the amount of approximately $170,000 per year. Finding~ Assembly Bill 2788 was enacted in the 1994 legislative session, and requires that each recipient agency of public safety augmentation funds to provide a Maintenance of Effort certification regarding the use of said dollars. The Auditor/Controllers office of the County of San Bernardino has requested the provision of a calculation and resolution indicating certification for the use of the funds. For fiscal year 1993/94 the City received $169,244; for fiscal year 1994/95 it is estimated that the City will received approximately $172,000. Staff has calculated and made the determination that the City has met its obligation for its Maintenance of Effort; and that is, that the City has maintained a minimum level of funding for public safety (police) based on the 1992/93 approved budget as the base year. A proposed resolution and the calculations determining the City's Maintenance of Effort have been completed and arc attached. It would be appropriate for the City Council to approve the attached resolution. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the enclosed resolution, certifying the City's Maintenance of Effort with regard to the use of public safety augmentation funds. R~ ctfully submitted, t~eoe~t~ - Administrative S~u~icZDirector RESOLUTION NO. 95-*'~*' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ITS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 2788 (PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUND). WHEREAS, during the 1994 legislative session, AB 2788 was enacted into statute and it required that a Maintenance of Effort threshold be met in order to utilize Proposition 172 funds; and, WHEREAS, this one half cent sales tax was authorized in 1994 as a result of the 1993/94 state budget; the one half cent sales tax allocated to local agencies was authorized to fund public safety activities such as police, sheriff, fire, district attomey, county corrections, and life guards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that since its base year of 1992/93, ,the City has enacted a Maintenance of Effort policy in providing police services for the City, and has, therefore, utilized Proposition 172 funds above the minimum funding level for public safety activities identified in the 1992/93 base year; and, WHEREAS, the City ofRancho Cucamonga has always maintained its public safety services at the highest possible level, and with the assistance of Proposition 172 funds, will continue to maintain and expand where appropriate its public safety services. NOW, THEREFORE, be is resolved that the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, Califomia, does hereby certify that its public safety augmentation funds (Proposition 172) are being utilized in a manner consistence with legislation adopted pursuant to Assembly Bill 2788. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RI ,PORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~eil, City Engineer Willie Vaibuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 94-2 I, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF TORONTO AVENUE, NORTH OF SEVENTH STREET, SUBMITTED BY JOHN W. WIDERA (APN 209-401-05) RECObtM'E. NDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DR 94-21 improvement agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. RACKGROUND/ANA! ,YSIS DR 94-21, located on the east side of Toronto Avenue, north of Seventh Street, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 10) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Division on February 7, 1995. This project is for the construction of a 104,390 square foot industrial building on a 8.14 acre parcel. The Developer, John W. ~Videra, has submitted an improvement agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Materials Bond: $36,200.00 $18,100.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City C!erk's office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to' Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City C!erk's office. Willi~ J. O~eil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw -.d RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 21, 1995, by John W. Widera, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Toronto Avenue, north of Seventh Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as DR 94-21; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 94-21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Pan 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 'T ~ 7rH Sr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR S ~I'E OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTS: DisL S1 S6 5800L EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: DR94-21 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Turf S.F. S.F. Trees Ea. 3 ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B N/A 8.14 16.28 8.14 8.14 6/21/95 231 CITY OF KANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21,1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner APPROVAl TO FXFCUTF A PROFFSSIONAI SFRVICFS AGRFFMFNT WITH AGAJANIAN & ASSOCIATI=S FOR THF PRF:PARATION OF A COMMFRCIA~ lAND USF AND MARKFT STUnY NOT TO FXCFFD $45.900.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council grant, by minute action, this award and execute the Professional Services Agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Over ten months ago the Planning Commission first raised concern with the increasing number of developers interested in requesting changes in land use designations for retail commercial uses. At the time our City was becoming aware of certain "targets of opportunity" having to do with commercial development and its fiscal impact. The Commission's concern centered on the realization that we would have no current economic information upon which to base their decisions and recommendations. Since many economic changes have occurred since the General Plan was initially adopted in 1981, it is the desire of the Planning Commission to take a fresh look at the document and the current economic basis upon which direction should or should not be considered with respect to commercial land use decisions. To answer questions affecting planning for economic development, the Commission proposed to conduct a comprehensive study of commercial land use. Important to the completion of such a study is accomplishing a market analysis and fiscal component upon which all commercial land use decisions are to be made. These concerns were forwarded to the City Council dudng the latter part of 1994 and discussed at recent workshops with the Planning Commission. With the City CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COMMERCIAL LAND USE AND MARKET STUDY June 21, 1995 Page 2 Council's approval, staff sent out Requests for Qualifications (RFQ), in Apdl 1995, to several economic consulting firms in Southern California. Of these highly qualified firms, Agajanian & Associates best matches our needs for this particular project. The proposed Scope of Work includes items requested by the Council during the workshops. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with Agajanian & Associates. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:AWrJfs CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE TO HOVEY ELECTRIC, INC., FOR THE AMOUNT OF $97,735.00 ($88,850.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM TDA ARTICLE 8 ACCOUNT NO. 124637-9401 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize for execution, the contract for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, to the lowest responsive bidder, Hovey Electric, Inc., for the amount of $88.850.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $97,735.00 ($88,850.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from TDA Article 8 Account No. 124637-9401 BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 30, 1995, for the subject project. Hovey Electric, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $88,850.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $100,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, WJO:LRB:ly Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET Bids Opened on May 30, 1995 Engineer's Estimate = $100,000.00 Hovey Electric Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $88,850.00 $88,850.00 2 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $112,327.00 $112,327.00 Peek Traffic Signal Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $97,195.00 $97,195.00 2 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $120,955.00 $120,995.00 Paige Electric Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $97,229.00 $97,229.00 2 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $112,922.00 $112,922.00 De La Cruz Construction Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $100, 174.00 $100,174.00 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $128,357.00 $128,357.00 Sierra Pacific Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Unit of Measure LS Estimated Quantity 1 Alternate A " Unit Price Total $103,100.00 $103,100.00 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $117,650.00 $117,650.00 Page 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET Bids Opened on May 30, 1995 Engineer's Estimate = $100,000.00 Superior Signal Servi:c Item Item No. Description I Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Unit of Measure LS Alternate A Estimated Unit Quantity Price Total 1 $105,328.00 $105,328.00 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $120,408.00 $120,408.00 DBX Inc. Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $122,142.00 $122,142.00 2 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $146,782.00 $146,782.00 MBE Electric Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Alternate A Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Total LS 1 $128,437.00 $128,437.00 2 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting LS Alternate B $143,893.00 $143,893.00 f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O~eil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR 1994/1995 FY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM PHASE II IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS TO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., FOR THE AMOUNT OF $555,923.5 ($505,385.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY)TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 014640-9400 AND 10- 4637-9113 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize for execution, the contract for FY Pavement Rehabilitation Program Phase II Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Laird Construction Company, Inc., for the amount of $505,385.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $555,923.5 ($505,385.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Account Nos. 01-4640-9400 and 10-4637-9113. BACKGROUND/ANAl .YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 30, 1995, for the subject project. Laird ConsWuction Company, Inc. is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $505,385.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $580,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, · William J. ~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:Iy ~,~Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM CDBG ACCOUNT NO. 284333-9105 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER TO BE DETERMINED AT THE BID OPENING SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M. ON THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1995 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Improvements. Bids are scheduled to be opened at 10:00 AM on Thursday, June 15. The project will be funded from CDBG Account No. 28-4333-9105. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 15, 1995, for the subject project. A memorandum, accompanied by a bid summary, will be presented to Council members this evening stating the low bidder, a bid summary and the amount of money to be appropriated. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $182,000.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O~eil City Engineer WJO:dlw ,/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: By: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~eil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector .... AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM AQMD GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 14-4158-7044. TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER TO BE DETERMINED AT THE BID OPENING SCHEDULED FOR 2:00 PM ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 1995. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for a Bus Bay on the north side of Arrow Route west of Haven Avenue. Bids are scheduled to be opened at 2:00 PM on Wednesday, June 21. The project will be funded from AQMD Grant Account No. 14- 4158-7044 BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 21, 1995, for the subject project. A memorandum, accompanied by a bid summary, will be presented to Council members this evening stating the low bidder, a bid summary and the amount of money to be appropriated. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $20,000.00. Respec.tfu'II~submitted, William~ City Engineer WJO:MDL:dlw J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City' Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier~ Sr. Civil Engineer ESTABLISHMENT OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG 4TH STREET; 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION, USING RULE 20-A FUNDS RECOMMENDATION Approval of a Resolution establishing Underground District No. 95-01, along Archibald Avenue and along 4th Street, 1,600 feet north and south of the intersection, using Rule 20-A Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Southern Califomia Edison allocates udergrounding funds to each City based on the number of electrical meters in the City. The use of these funds is govemed by the so-called Rule 20 regulations. Rule 20-A covers all activities for undergrounding and is paid for by SCE except modifications or replacements of electrical service panels for users. Rule 20-A funds are reserved for heavily used streets, and/or for scenic purposes. The project must also be a minimum of 600 feet in length. The City contacted Edison with a request to have Edison underground some lines along a portion of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street, running 1,600 feet north and east of the intersection of these two streets. Edison suggested the City use the Rule 20-A funds to perform the work. However, it should be noted that these poles also have 66KV lines on them. This means the 66KV would remain overhead and the poles would not be removed. What is removed are the lower cross arms that carry the 12KV. We would see then two of the existing four cross arms removed along with the underground to overhead feeder lines. Presently them are two private structures within the proposed District: one on the west side of Archibald Avenue and one on the south side of 4th Street, both maintain overhead service. The one on Archibald is a house and the one on 4th Street is an office complex used by the Environmental Agency of the County. Both of these will continue to use the overhead feed installation by Edison. Each will have an on-site pole for connection to their Meter and Electric connection. 4/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESTABLISHMENT OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01. ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 4TH STREET JUNE 21, 1995 Page 2 The conversion costs for the two existing structures should be minimal. Staff recommends the City provide the conversion for each. The conversion would require a minor modification in the overhead service connection. similar to the one performed on Base Line Road under another Underground Utility District. That conversion cost the City less than $500.00 for two structures. They will continue the existing services on-site via overhead feeds. Therefore, there should be no public interference with service or any need for additional contributions to complete the project from property owners. The City's current balance in the Southern California Edison Rule 20oA account is approximately $700,000.00. The undergrounding at Archibald Avenue and 4th Street is estimated to cost $530,000.00. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MO:Iy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG 4TH STREET, 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 4TH STREET, USING RULE 20-A FUNDS WHEREAS, A PUBLIC HEARING was held on June 21, 1995 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia to determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district along Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia; and WHEREAS, A NOTICE of such hearing has been given to all effected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all utilities concerned in the manner and for the time required by law; and WHEREAS, SUCH HEARING has been duly and regularly held and all persons interested have been given an opportunity to be heard; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1: It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 13.04 and the definitions contained herein that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare requires the information of an underground utility district along Archibald Avenue and along 4th Street, 1,600 feet north and south of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street in order to remove excessive overhead utility wires, and associated structures and to underground utilities along said portion of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. Said Archibald Avenue and 4th Street are public streets which are extensively used by the general public and carry heavy volumes of vehicular traffic. Section 2: An underground utility district to be known as Underground Utility District No. 95-01 is hereby established in that area along Archibald Avenue and along 4th Street, 1,600 feet north and south of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street in Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia more particularly described as follows: Those portions of Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands Tract, Map Book 4 Page 9, as recorded in the office of the San Bemardino County Recorder, California, lying within a strip of land 300 feet wide, the centerline of said strip being the centerline of Archibald Avenue running from 4th Street (San Bemardino Avenue) to 1,600 feet north; and the centerline of 4th Street (San Bemardino Avenue) running from Archibald Avenue to 1,600 feet east, said streets shown on said map. RESOLUTION NO. UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 905-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG 4TH STREET JUNE 21, 1995 Page 2 Section 3: All 12KV wires and associated overhead structures shall be removed and underground installations made in said underground utility district within the following times and conditions: a. Underground installation by utility companies and property owners and reconnections no later than August 1, 1996. b. That Southern Califomia Edison Company utilizes Rule 20-A funds to underground the first 125 feet of service lateral for those property owners required to be converted to underground. Section 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy hereof and a copy of Municipal Code Section 13.04 to all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all affected utilities within ten days after adopted of this resolution. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ,REPORT June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE PLAN COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approve a resolution accepting the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan of San Bernardino County. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AP 939 or the IWM Act) was passed by the State of California in response to the concerns of impending shortage of landfill capacity. AB 939 set forth numerous policies, which included a hierarchy of preferred waste management practices for state and local governmental agencies. The intent of AB 939 is to reduce, reuse and recycle as much of the state's solid waste as feasible. AB 939 requires the preparation of a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). The plan consists of four elements and a summary plan. Each jurisdiction is required to prepare and submit a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE), Household Hazardous Waste Element (HWE) and a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE). To complete the CIWMP, the County of San Bernardino is required to prepare a Countywide Siting Element and Summary Plan and must be approved by effected jurisdictions within the County. The County of San Bemardino has prepared a Final Draft of the Countywide Siting and Summary Element which demonstrates that there is at least 15 years of remaining disposal capacity, if combined with proposed landfill expansions, increased diversion efforts and export of waste, to serve all the jurisdictions within the County. The Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan has been prepared in conjunction with local jurisdictions' SRRE, HHWE, and NDFE. The preliminary Siting and Summary Element was CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WAST PLAN June 21, 1995 Page 2 reviewed by each of the County's local jurisdictions and the San Bemardino County Board of Supervisors prior to the final draft. The Siting Element is a document "which provides a description of the areas to be used development of adequate transformation or disposal capacity" (Public Resources Code (PRC) section 41700). The Siting Element serves as a policy manual and demonstrates that the County has sufficient disposal capacity to provide 15 years of waste disposal for its participants. The Siting Element provides proposals for expansion and/or closure of landfill sites to meet the 15 year requirement of AB 939. The Summary Element contains the goals and policies faced by the County and waste management programs and steps to cooperatively implement these programs among the County jurisdictions to meet the mandates of AB 939. As stated in the Siting Element, jurisdictions must make every effort to meet their 25% and 50% diversion mandates. The Summary Plan is updated every 5 years along with any other affected elements of the CIW1VIP. After reviewing the information contained in the County of San Bemardino's Countywide Summary and Siting Element it is staffs recommendation that Council accept the Countywide Siting Element and Summary Plan and approve the attached resolution. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw cc: Diane O'Neal, Management Analysis II Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CIWMP) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939) requires local government to adopt a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP); and WHEREAS, AB 939 requires local govemments to implement waste diversion programs to divert 25% of solid waste from landfills by the year 1995 and 50% by the year 2000; and WHEREAS, the CIWMP, which includes the Countywide Siting Element and the Countywide Summary Plan, has been prepared in accordance with State law governing the content of these plans; and WHEREAS, environmental documentation has been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local environmental guidelines; and WHEREAS, County staff reviewed the Summary Plan and Siting Element and is in agreement that preparation of these elements is categorically exempt from CEQA; and WHEREAS, County staff will/has file/filed a Notice of Exemption; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES to adopt the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP) presented at this meeting on this date. q7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Brart, AICP, Associate Planner SUB.rECT: ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT ANT} GENERAI. PI.AN AMENDMENT NO. 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING I')EVEI.OPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 ' dwelling units per acre) for 138 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT AN13 r)EVEI.OPMFNT DISTRICT AMENr)MF. NT NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVE. I .OPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAl. AREA SPECIFIC PI .AN AMENDMENT NO. 95-01 -NORTHTOWN HOUSING r)EVF. I .OPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for L38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. RKCOMMF, N!)ATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Resolutions approving General Plan Amendment No. 95-01 A, Development Diswict Amendment No. 95-01, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA NO. 95-01A, DDA NO. 95-01, IASPA 95-01 June 21, 1995 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The subject applications were filed by the Northtown Housing Development Corporation as part of their neighborhood residential housing infill program. The Corporation's infill program is consistent with the Redevelopment Agency's affordable housing strategy. The Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the subject applications on May 24, 1995. Public testimony supported the land use change. No written or oral opposition to the land use change was received. The Planning Commission concurs with staff that the requested residential use in the Low Medium range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre is compatible with surrounding land uses. Also, the Commission finds that the site is suitable in size for the requested land use change. Therefore, the Commission recommends approval of the requested General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. (See attached PlanningCommission Staff Report, dated May 24, 1995; adopted Resolution Nos. 95-2 l, 95-22, and 95-23; and minutes of the meeting.) ENVIRONMENTAl .: The Planning Commission finds that there will be no environmental impacts resulting from the requested land use change and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public heating in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. ACTION: If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff, it would be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolutions approving General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A, Development District Amendment No. 95-01, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01. Respectfull submittal, , City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 24, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes dated May 24, 1995 Resolutions of the Planning Commission Nos. 95-21, 95-22, and 95-23 Resolutions of Approval CITY OF .RA_NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May24,1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT AND GENERAl, PI,AN AMENDMENT 95-01A - NORTHTOg HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Slxeet east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01 ENVIRONMENTAl, ASSESSMENT AND DEVEI .OPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-01 - NORTHTOg HOUSING BEVEl ,OPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAl. AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 - NORTHTOg HOUSING BEVEl .OPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medim Residential, 4.8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Mettim residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. PROJECT AND SITE, DESCRIPTION: A, Zoning and S,,rronridinl, [ .and Use: North Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling South - East - West - units per acre); developed, single family residential and one vacant parcel (acres) General Industrial (Subarea 4); Railroad and vacant except for three single family residences on the south side of 8th Street. Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre); developed, single family residential Industrial Park (Subarea 17); developed, industrial (contractor's office and yard) J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 95-0 IA - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 2 General Plan l~esiVnation: Project Site - General Industrial North - Low Residential South - General Industrial East - Low Residential West - General Industrial C, Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and covered with non-native grasses and weeds, with evidence of weed clearance. One tree, species unknown, is located at the northwest comer of the site. There are two Eucalyptus trees which appear to be dead. A portion of the west end of the site is fenced and is currently used as a drainage easement. The site is relatively flat with a gradient from north to south of approximately 2 percent grade. ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, Pan I, and completed the Environmental Checklist, Pan II of the Initial Study, and has determined that no significant adverse -environmental impacts will occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment, Development Districts Amendment, or Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. Under the Master - Environmental Assessment for the 1988 update of the General Plan, the site was planned for industrial development. A change to residential development would not appear to introduce any greater impact than industrial development. A, Water: Historically this parcel has received storm nm-off water and been subject to flooding. However, with the completion of the Main Street/Archibald Avenue Storm Drain, which is under construction, the site will be protected from flooding. Noise: This parcel is adjacent to the Metrolink Track. Prior to residential development an analysis and mitigation of noise impacts will be necessary. Mitigation of noise impacts for residential development adjacent to the railroad track has recently been achieved for the nearby Del Notre family aparunent complex. D, Population: A maximum population increase of 42 persons is estimated to occur with development of 14 one- and two-bedroom apartments. Housing: Development of up to 14 units of housing will not substantially change existing housing opportunities, but will increase the number of affordable sites. I,AND USE ANAI,YSIS: A, Appropriateness of the existinl, General Industrial designation. No narrative record has been found explaining the industrial designation of the subject site. On the one hand, it can be inferred that the existing contractor's yard adjoining the property to the west and the availability of a rail spur to the south were significant factors leading to the industrial designation. On the other hand, adjoining residential development serves as a constraint to PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 3 industrial development with stringent design requirements to achieve buffering of the industrial use from the residential use. Further, the rail spur is unused, partially buffed and apparently abandoned. Appropriateness of requested residential use. Residential use is consistent with adjoining residential development to the north and east of the subject site in the "L" (2 to 4 dwelling twits per acre) designation. The neighborhood is characterized by single story, detached houses built from 1910 to 1935 on lots ranging in size from 4,000 to 8,500 square feet. There are a number of vacant parcels ranging in size from 4,000 to 18,000 square feet. The original plot was for 4,000 square foot lots. Four lots on the north side of the street are 4,000 square feet, two lots are 6,000 square feet, and the remaining lots are somewhat larger. The houses are typically small, ranging in size from 640 to 1,720 square feet. Several sites have second units. More than half the units are rentals. Discussion of requested l.ow Medium CI.M'' - 4 to 8 dwellin~ units per acre) Residential designation. The site was originally plotted for 13.7 lots which were each 4,000 square feel The "LM" (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) designation could yield from 10 to 12 units on lots ranging from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. With a Conditional Use Permit some or all the lots could support a second unit yielding up to 24 units on the site. The "LM" designation is consistent with the unit size and most of the lot sizes found in the neighborhood. The "LM" designation is also consistent with the "LM" designation for the Villa del None development located on Feron Boulevard with an entrance on Main Street. Further, the "LM" designation would be consistent with the transitional character of the subject site between the adjoining "L" (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) designation on the north and east, the developed industrial property on the west, and the planned industrial use to the south. Discussion of alternative I .ow CI ." - 2 to 4 dwelling .nits per acre,) residential designations. The "L" designation would be consistent with the density designation of the area to the north and east of the subject site. Under the designation the average lot size is 8,000 square feet and each newly constructed dwelling unit would typically be larger than 2,000 square feet. In general, the larger product type would not be consistent with the smaller units existing in the neighborhood. The 1.38 net acre parcel could yield 7 lots, averaging 8,000 square feet each. With a Conditional Use Permit, each lot could support a second unit, in theory yielding a maximum of 14 units on the site. Discussion of altemative Medi.m CM" - 8 to 14 dwelling ,,nits per acre) residential designations. The "M" designation typically is developed into two-story multi-family units. Under the "M" range, the site could support from 11 to 19 units. A two-story apartment development would not be compatible with the one-story, single family character of the neighborhood. Further, according to the noise study completed for the nearby Villa del None project, a single story development can be effectively shielded by a sound wall, but the second story of a two-story development must use costly construction designed to provide an adequate barrier for the sound levels generated by passing trains. Both a sound wall and sound barrier..._.~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 .hge4 construction have been incorporated into the two-story Villa del None project. A multi-family complex was developed under the "M" designation and is located nearby on the Northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard. F, Corrtparison of the "l .M." "l .." and "M" residential designations. Comparison of the requested "LM" designation, the "L" alternative, and the "M" alternative, indicates that development of 14 units on the site would be consistent with surrounding densities. The applicant could achieve 14 units per acre under either the "L," "LM," or "M" designation, but the "LM" designation achieved through a density bonus appears to be most consistent with the actual lot sizes in the neighborhood. If the applicant did not go forward with development, the "LM" designation would be more appropriate as a transitional density than either the "L" or the "M" designation. Conformance with the General Plan. Because the site is transitional between IndusUial and Residential, either designation is consistent with the General Plan. Copformance with the Development District Map and Industrial Area Specific Plan. Because the site is transitional between Industrial and Residential, either designation is consistent with the Development District Map and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. CONCEPT PI.AN PREI.IMINARY ANAl .YSIS: No development package has been submitted with the subject applications. However, the applicant has submitted a concept plan for discussion purposes only, (see Exhibit "D"). The concept calls for restricted, affordable units to be owned by the Northtown Housing Development Corporation, managed by the Southern California Housing Development Corporation, and financed by the Redevelopment Agency. The concept plan proposes restricted and affordable rental units which will be fenced and gated. The product type proposed is a single-story attached garden apartment project consisting of 14 one- and two-bedroom rental units, ranging in size from 700 to 900 square feet with one detached garage per unit and additional parking consistent with the Development Code. The Development Code requires a minimum 5-acre parcel for a clustered, garden apartment project and use of the Optional Development Standards. Under State law the applicant may request a density bonus, waiver of development standards, and other incentives for development of a restricted, affordable project. The applicant proposes a restricted, affordable project and is expected to apply for a density bonus and waiver of the Optional Development Standards. On April 14, 1995, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the 25th Street office of the Northtown Neighborhood Development Corporation which was artended by ten residents, the Board of the Corporation, theft professional consultants, and City Staff. After a presentation of the concept, the neighbors and property owners attending were asked if there were any objections to the project. No objections were made. A neighborhood need for small rental apartments was expressed by PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 5 Again, density and design issues will be resolved when an application for development for the subject site is submitted. As a concept the proposal to develop rental units is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. The proposed unit size of 700 to 900 square feet is 'also consistent with surrounding single family unit size. With a variance and some design modifications, the cluster plan offers oppommities for sound buffering and common open space which would not be available with a small lot, detached development. Security is a concern in the neighborhood. If the garages were pushed to the property line with visual access from the units, the garage and parking area would be more secure than with access from a fence. Further, a row of garages would serve as a sound buffer. The potential pedestrian conflict could be handled by design elements such as a low fence and/or landscaping. As an alternative to the cluster concept, the applicant might develop a row of duplex units. The small lot size would probably necessitate front-on, street-side garages. Street-side garages would not be consistent with the character of the neighborhood, because the 1920's bungalows either do not have garages or have garage access from an alley or a driveway from the front to the rear yard. Because the site is only 1.38 acres in size, the subject application for residential designation will only minimally change the ratio of single family to multi-family development at build out. An application for development based on the concept plan would require a density bonus and would slightly increase the percent of multi-family units City wide. The current 65 percent single family to 35 percent multi-family ratio was achieved following a series of rezonlng actions based on City Council Resolution 91-060, adopted on February 26, 1991, which established that multi-family housing should be between 32 and 35 percent of total housing units at build out. If an application were approved for a 14 unit multi-family development, the estimated number of muiti-family units at build out would increase from 18,949 to 18,963 units, or .074 percent. In other words the applicant's multi-family concept would not materially affect the City Council's goal. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this application: A. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access, size, and surrounding land use. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental Study which indicates that no significant impacts would be expected as a result of this land use change. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and Development Code due to the site's ability to promote the goals and objectives for the Low Medium Residential District. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORT GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWNHOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24,1995 Page 6 2. ENVIRONMENTAl, ASSESSMENT: Parts I and II of an Initial Study have been completed as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. The determination is that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration should be issued. COR RF, SPONDF. NCF.: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution, thereby recommending that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment 95-01A. City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "B" - General Plan Land Use Map (excerpt) Exhibit "C" - Development District Map (excerpt) Exhibit "D" - Concept Plan Resolution Recommending Approval - General Plan Amendmere 95-01A Resolution Recommending Approval - Development District Amendment 95-01 Resolution Recommending Approval - Industrial Area Specific Plan 95-01 PET'ER J. P A ~ C H ITASSI, I T E AIA C T March 15, 1995 Mr. Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: General Plan Amendment (G.P.A.) Specific Plan Amendment (S.P.A.) Development District Amendment (D.D.A.) 9775 Main Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA A.P.N. 209-062-02 Dear Brad: On behalf of the Northtown Housing Development Corp., please accept this letter of justification regarding our applications for a G.P.A., S.P.A., and D.D.A. for the above referenced property. The Northtown Housing Development Corp. recently purchased this parcel from the Riverside Blueprint Company with the intent of developing affordable multi-family housing. This is their mission in the Northtown Community. We feel that the most logical use of this property is in a multi-family residential development. As you are aware, the Northtown Housing Development Corp. currently has the "Villa Del Notre" project under construction which includes 3, 4, and 5 bedroom townhouse type apartments. We have recently received approval for our in-fill single family detached program and this Main Street site will allow opportunity for 1 and 2 bedroom apartments. This is one of the last available parcels in Northtown of adequate 'size to accommodate an apartment project of this type. Mr. Brad Bulle March 15, 1995 Page 2 Development of this parcel is desired by the Board in order to provide a full range of housing opportunities within the community. A multi-family designation will also allow us the flexibility to successfully screen the adjacent Electrical Supply Company's equipment yard. This parcel and its neighboring parcel to the west were included in the Sub-Area 17 designation of the I.A.S.P.. It is interesting to note that both of these parcels were assigned residential status in the original General Plan. Considering that the parcel to the west is currently developed as noted above, it seems reasonable to conclude that an 'LM" or "M" designation for our parcel would provide us the opportunity to transition the land use from industrial to single family. As you are aware, we are currently working with your staff to develop a preliminary plan which will address specific planning and engineering issues. A Design Review Application will be forthcoming in the near future. Brad, as always, thank you for your assistance and please advise if you are in need of additional information. Very truly y~, s Peter . i rchitect ! PJP:caa There were no public comments at this time. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to continue to June 14, 199S. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES= COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE - ABSENT: BARKER - carried ***,, ..F~_,,-'''~: .~...,-. B. TENTATIVE PARCET. M~P 14789 - P~TOUN DE~/ET~DPMF. NT - A subdivision of 5.5 acres of land into 1 parcel f~gr-.t~ersion to acreage (currently 21 parcels) in the Low Residential Di&r,e~ct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and vacation of Park o~e~' Hill Drive, I on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calls del Prado, Ay208-921-15 through 35. an McNiel reiterated that the applicant had requested the item be ENVIRON~NT~r, ASSESSmeNT AND GENEPJ~T. PT.AN A~NDM~NT 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DN~/~r.OPM~.NT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9778 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L' (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Mediu~ residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN= 209-062-01. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. De ENVIRONM~,NT~T. ARSESSM~-NT AND DN~/ETOPM~.NT DISTRICT AM~.NDFNT 9~-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVETOPM~.NT CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to 'LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider "L' (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and 'M' (Medium residential, 8-14 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 209-062-01. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. [NVIRONM~NT~T. ASSESSM~.NTAND INDUSTRI~T- ~R~A SPECIFIC PT.AN AMeNDmeNT 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING D~V~.TnPFNT CORPORATION - A 'request to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to 'LM' (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also consider 'L' (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN= 209-062-01. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Lumpp complimented Ms. Bratt on the staff report and said it was well thought out and one of the most comprehensive reports he had read. He stated that he would like placed in the record that the Commission was not authorizing or condoning approval of the concept plan included with the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 24, 1995 Ms. Brat= confirmed that the concept plan was included for the Commission'e information only. She said the concept plan is what the applicant is currently considering ~ut it does not have any relationship to the land use change and the . City does not have an application for development at this time. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the railway spur will eventually be removed. Ms. Brat= replied that a letter had been sent to the railway but no response had been received as yet. She noted that the spur is currently covered with sand. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the spur is located. Ms. Brat= indicated that the line comes in from Archibald and parallels the adjacent property to the west and returns =o the main line. Commissioner Tolstoy noted that the track is now being used by Metrolink and he thought they may wish to use it as a siding. He asked how i= would impact the project if the railroad refuses =o abandon Ms. Brat= thought =he spur is located approximately 15 to 20 feet from the property line. She thought the property could be developed with a fence or garages adjacent =o the spur =o mitigate any negative impacts. Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Pete Pitassi, architect, 8439 White Oak Avenue, Suite 165, Rancho Cucemonga, stated he was representing North=own Housing Development Corporation. He camplime=ted Ms. Brat= on her staff report. He felt the report was complete an~ he supported staff's recommendations. He noted that Le Vine Management would most likely provide property management for any project developed on this property, rather than Southern California Housing Development Corporation as indicated in the staff report. He confirme~ that the applicant understood that a recommendation of approval for =he three amendments =his evening would not imply endorsement of =he concept plan. He said it had been included to provide some information on the thought processes =hat are going on. He thought they may be ready to submit a design review application within the next several weeks. He noted that any development of the property will require an acoustic analysis and would undoubtedly require an acoustic wall to mitigate the issue of the railroad. He said they had written a letter to the rail authority in April had not received a response as yet. Vice Chairman McNiel expresse~ appreciation for the work of the North=own Housing Development Corporation and the involvement of the neighborhood. As there were no other public comments, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher felt the request was reasonable and he supported Motion= Moved by Melcher, seconded by Lumpp, =o recommend approval of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 95-01A, Development District Amendment 95-01, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 95-01. Motion carried by the following vote= AYES: COMMISSIONERSz NOES: NONE ABSENT: BARKER LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY - carried Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 24, 1995 RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT 95-01A, CHANGING THB GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN= 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A as described in the title of this Resolution. Her·in·fear in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application.' 2. On May 24, 1995, =he Planning Co~taission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adol~cion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, de~ermined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as followsz 1. This Cc~m~ission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this C~ission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 2~, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows= a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically · rec~anqular configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 fee~ east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said proper~y is currently designated as Industrial Park; and b, The propez~y to the north of the subJec~ site is designated Low Residential and is ln-par~ developed with single f~mlly residences and ln-par~ vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The proper~y to the east is design·ted Low Residential and is developed. The proper~y to the south is designated General Industrial a~ is ln- par~ railroad right-of-way, ln-par~ vacant and undeveloped, and in-par~ developed with single family residences. c, This amendment does no~ conflic~ with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and de Element; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 195 Page 2 e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes am follows= a. That the subjec~c property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding areas and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properriseS and That ~he proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facets and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Co~miseion finds that there is no substantial evidence that the projec~ will have a significant effect upon the environment and recmnds adol~cion of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as followsz a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Enviror~ental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunderS that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent Judgment of the Planning Commission$ and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows= In considering the record as · whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impec~ upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exh~bits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby reco~nends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A. PLANNING COI~4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 195 Page 3 6. The Secre=ary to this Camuission shall cer=ify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Bullet, SecttraiT of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucmm~nga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularl~ introduced, passed, and adol~ced by the Planning Ca~mismion of the City of Rancho Cuc~monga, a= · regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of May 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES= COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES= COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT .' COMMISSIONERS ~ BARKER RESOLUTION NO. 95-22 A R~SOLUTION OF TaX PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPHENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-01 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM SUBAREA 17 IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA, TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, A~D MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNz 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for DevelolMnent Die=tic= Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May ~4, 1995, the Planning Cc~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 95-21, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution hav~ occurred. B. Resolution. NO~, THEREFOHE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of =he City of Ranthe Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cuemission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 24, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows= a, The application applies to approximately 1,38 acres of land, basically a tic=angle configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said proper~y is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 17}$ and b. The proper~y to the north of the subject sate is designated Low Residential and is in-par~ developed with single f~mAly residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The proper~y to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The proper~y to the south £s designated General Industr£al (Subarea 4) and is in-par= railroad right-of-way, in-par= vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related developments and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-22 DDA 9S-01 - NORTHTOWN MOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 2 d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as foliowe: a. That the subject proper~y is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding Troperties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adol~cion of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as followsz a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as &mended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent Judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows~ In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Coalmission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presuml~ion of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby reco~aendl approval of Development District Amendment No. 95-01. ~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-22 DDA 9~-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Cainlesion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 1995 . PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · ~T. McNi l, Vice Chairman I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc~monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and re~ular~ introduced, passed, and adol~cedby the Planning Cam~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of May 1995, by the following vote-to-wit= AYESz COMMISSIONERSz LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS= BARKER RESOLUTION NO. 95-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AR~A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK ( SUBAREA 17 ) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LA~D LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNz 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Developeaent Corporation has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of =his Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan amendment is referred to as "the application.' 2. On May 24, i995, the Planning Ccm~nission of the City of Rancho Cucmnga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 95-21, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THXREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Co~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows= 1. This Co~ission hereby specif~.cally finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Par~ A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 24, 199S, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this C~mmission hereby specifically finds as follows= .' a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 fee~ eas~ of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said proper~y is currently designated as Industrial Park; and b. The proper~y to the north of the subJec~ site is designated Low Residential and is in-per~ developed with single family residences and in-par~ vacant and undeveloped. The property to the wee= is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The proper~y to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The proper~y to the south is designated General Industrial (Subarea 4) and is in-par~ railroad right-of-way, ln-par~ vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c, This amendment does not conflic~ with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related developments and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-23 ISPA 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 2 d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land U~e Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to tl,is Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coauuilsion hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject proper~y is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and canpatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c, That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with ell written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the proJec~ will have a significant effect upon the environment and reccaunends adoFelon of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as followez a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as followIt In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse ~npac~ upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Coa~lllion during the public hearing, the Planning Coe2illion hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01. 7~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-23 ISPA 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 1995 Page 3 6. The SecretarT to this Camnission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T. McN' , Vice Chairman A B I, Brad Bullet, Secretaz7 of the Planning Commission of =he City of Rancho Cucmnonga, do hereby cez~cify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adol~ced by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of May 1995, by the following vote-to-wit= AYES: NOIS = ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS= COMMISSIONERS= COMMISSIONERS= LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE BARKER 7/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 95-01A, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - conducted a duly noticed public headng, and on June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Ranch~ Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dudng the above-referenced public headng on May 24, 1995, and to this Council dudng the above-referenced public headng on June 21, 1995, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is in-part developed with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 2 the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The property to the south is designated General Industrial and is in-paR railroad right-of-way, in-part vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor.the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 95-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 3 b, That, based on the environmental assessment, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council approves General Plan Amendment No. 95-01A. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 95-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development Distdct Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinaffer in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as '~he application." 2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and on June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public headng on May 24, 1995, and to this Council during the above-referenced public headng on June 21, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is in-part developed with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to -75 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N(.). DDA 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV, CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 2 the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The property to the south is designated General Industrial and is in-part railroad right-of-way, in-part vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DDA 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 3 b. That, based on the environmental assessment, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council approves Development Distdct Amendment No. 95-01. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 77 RESOLUTION NO. (~.~- / O / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 95-01 REMOVING FROM THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP 1.38 ACRES DESIGNATED INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 17) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - conducted a duly noticed public headng, and on June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Coundl hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dudng the above-referenced public headng on May 24, 1995. and to this Council dudng the above-referenced public headng on June 21, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 17); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is in-part developed with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to CI'FY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. IASPA NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 2 the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The prope~, to the south is designated General Industrial and is in-part railroad right-of-way, in-pert vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties andwould not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformanoe with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. IASPA NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 1995 Page 3 b. That, based on the environmental assessment, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE On June 13, 1995, the Route 30 Task Force convened in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. The meeting was artended by nearly all of the committee members as well as City staff, CalTrans and SANBAG representatives. At this meeting the committee wanted to again re-examine the Profile for the proposed Route 30 Freeway focusing on Sapphire Street. Presentations were made by CalTrans representative Garry Cohoe and by the City Engineer. Three basic Alternatives were discussed in detail. The three Alternatives under discussion were Project as proposed by CalTrans which would provide for the freeway to be over Sapphire Street. Sapphire Street would be continuous and remain in its current location. Freeway at grade with Sapphire cul-de-saced on the north and south side of the freeway. Sapphire would no longer be a continuous street. This alternative has significant impact on emergency services. The freeway at grade and Sapphire over the freeway in an elevated condition. This alternative would require the acquisition of approxirnately 17 properties, would add an additional 17 million to the overall costs of the project and could delay the environmental review for up to one year. A copy of the Staff Report detailing the alternatives is attached. The City Engineer passed out computer enhanced photographs showing the visual impacts of the three alternatives under discussion. Gary Moon from SANBAG made a presentation regarding funding constraints, and SANBAG's desin to see Alternative # 1 approved. Mr. Moon discussed the problems with Alternate #3 including additional cost and delay in completing the environmental process. Mr. Moon indicated the additional cost of Alternative #3 will impact the ability of SANBAG to complete the portion of the freeway from Haven to the Los Angeles County line. The Committee discussed the pros and cons of the various proposals. The Committee voted 11 ayes and 3 noes to recommend Alternative #3 to the City Council. Alternative #3 would provide for the freeway to be at grade, with Sapphire Street to be constructed over the freeway. The Committee felt MEMBERS OF THE CITY COLrNCIL RTOUE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE June 21, 1995 Page 2 this was the best alternative became it provided for a continuous Sapphire Street and would provide a more esthetically pleasing scenario in spite of its additional cost. The Committee noted the fi'eeway is a long term project and esthetics and quality of construction are extremely important with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Committee's feeling was the residents in the area may be best served by Alternative #3. Two Task Force members recommended that Alternative # 1 as the most economical and equally esthetically pleasing as Alternative #3. One Committee member felt that Alternative #2 should be approved. At the end of the meeting comments from the public were received. Several residents expressed their feelings regarding the Sapphire alternatives. The consensus of the speakers was that Alternative #3 as approved by the Committee seemed to be the best proposal under the circumstances. The Committee also discussed phasing issues. The phasing, as proposed by SANBAG, would construct the freeway fi'om 1-15/30 Interchange to Haven Avenue on the westend and from I-I 5/30 to approximately Sierra Avenue in Fontaria on the east. The Committee expressed concern that if the freeway terminated at Haven Avenue traffic congestion and additional problems within the community would result. SANBAG representative Gary Moon described the phasing and the necessity to construct the freeway in order to best utilize existing funds and to provide maximum opportunities for' obtaining funds in the future. The phasing issue will be addressed at future meetings. The Committee agreed due to smnmer vacations a 60 day break should be taken with the next meeting in September of 1995. Re~s~spect(ful_ly submitte W~II~~J. Alexander Mayor WJA:dlw Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 13, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Route 30 Task Force William J. O~leil, City Engineer CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE PROFILES AT SAPPHIRE STREET Last month the Task Force discussed some implications of various ways of treating the freeway as it crosses Sapphire Street. The report from last month on some traffic implications is attached for your further reference. This month, some additional considerations are presented, as requested by the Task Force There are four ways in which the freeway can be carried across the Sapphire Street area. They are as follows: 1. The freeway over Sapphire; 2. The freeway at grade at Sapphire, requiring the closure of Sapphire; 3. The freeway at grade at Sapphire, requiring Sapphire to go over the freeway, resulting in the acquisition of several homes; 4. The freeway fully depressed at Sapphire, which has significant cost and safety implications. Alternative 4 has been discussed at some length and it has such a high cost ($70 million) due to the Cucamonga Creek and M.W.D. pipeline crossings, and such great safety concerns caused by the overhead creek crossing that it was the consensus of the committee this option was not a viable one. The advantages and disadvantages of the other three alternatives are as follows: 1. FREEWAY OVI:~.R SAPPHIRE (,F. stirnated cost $?7 milliorO Advantages: · Sapphire Street would not be severed. · Sapphire Street would remain open during construction of the freeway. · Flood Control access roads would not be severed. · The recreational trail adjacent to Cucamonga Channel would not be significantly impacted. · All improvements are covered by the environmental document, therefore not delaying the project. · No homes need to be purchased. ROUTE 30 STAFF REPORT ALTERNATIVE PROFILES AT SAPPI-HRE STREET June 13, 1995 Page 2 ~ , Disadvantages. · The freeway would be elevated, varying in height from 35 feet with sound wall at Sappl'ire Street to 14 feet (the height of the sound wall only) at Jasper Street, a distance of 2000 feet. · The elevated freeway would have a visual impact on the adjacent residents. FREEWAY AT GRADE. AT SAPPHIRE REQUIRING THE CI.OSURE OF SAPPHIRE (.Estimated cost $35 milllot0. Advantages: · The sound wall would be the only freeway improvement visible from the adjoining properties. · No additional properties would need to be acquired. · No significant impact to the schedule for approval of the environmental document. · Sapphire Street would not be elevated, therefore not creating a visual impact to the surrounding community. Disadvantages: · Sapphire Street would be severed, forcing all vehicles to utilize Carnelian Street to travel across the freeway. · Severs the flood control maintenance roads adjacent to Cucarnonga Channel. · A structure would be constructed over the freeway to accommodate the recreation trail, causing negative impact to the facility. · Emergency response time will increase and will impact traffic circulation as detailed in last months report (attached). FREEWAY AT GRADE AT SAPPHIRE REQUIRING SAPPHIRE TO GO OVER FREEWAY (,Estimated cost $,14 millior0. Advantages: · Sapphire Street would not be severed, eliminating emergency and traffic impacts. · The sound wall would be the only freeway improvement visible from the adjoining properties. Disadvantages: · Requires the acquisition of seventeen homes, requiring modification of the environmental document. · Severs the access from Sapphire Street to the church located in the northeast quadrant. · Sapphire Street would be elevated, varying from 0 feet to 12 feet for a distance of 1600 feet. · Severs the flood control maintenance roads adjacent to Cucamonga Channel. ROUTE 30 STAFF REPORT ALTERNATIVE PROFILES AT SAPPHIRE STREET June 13, 1995 Page 3 · A structure would be constructed over the freeway to accommodate the recreational trail, causing negative impact to the facility. · The noise impact would be greater especially at second story level, than that of the elevated version. Conclusion The Task Force should consider all impacts of each alternative in its formulation of a recommended profile. Respectfully Submitted,, City Eng'meer WJO:PAR:Iy Attachment Safety Fire Chief 3% Deferred Comp Deputy Chief Battalion Chief 56 Hr workweek Battalion Chief 40 Hr workweek Fire Marshal 40 hr work week MANAGEMENT SALARY RANGES A B C D E 37.36 39.23 41.19 43.25 45.41 2989.01 3 138.46 3295.39 3460.16 3633.16 6476.18 6799.99 7140.00 7497.00 7871.85 6669.33 7002.79 7352.94 7720.58 8106.61 33.97 35.66 37.45 39.32 41.29 2717.28 2853.14 2995.80 3145.60 3302.88 5887.44 6181.81 6490.90 6815.46 7156.24 20.22 21.23 22.29 23.40 24.58 2264.40 2377.62 2496.50 2621.33 2752.40 4906.20 5151.51 5409.09 5679.54 5963.52 28.31 29.72 31.21 32.77 34.41 2264.40 2377.62 2496.50 2621.33 2752.40 4906.20 5151.51 5409.09 5679.54 5963.52 28.31 29.72 31.21 32.77 34.41 2264.40 2377.62 2496.50 2621.33 2752.40 4906.20 5151.51 5409.09 5679.54 5963.52 Hou~y Bi-weekly Monthly Hourly Bi-weekly Monthly Hourly Bi-weekly Monthly Houdy Bi-weekly Monthly Hourly Bi-weekly Monthly Non-Safety Admin Services Officer Management Analyst II Maintenance Officer 22.72 23.85 25.04 26.30 27.61 Hourly 1817.28 1908.15 2003.55 2103.73 2208.92 Bi-weekly 3937.44 4134.32 4341.03 4558.08 4785.99 Monthly 20.45 21.47 22.55 23.67 24.86 Hourly 1636.09 1717.89 1803.78 1893.97 1988.67 Bi-weekly 3544.85 3722.09 3908.20 4103.61 4308.79 Monthly 20.84 21.88 22.98 24.13 25.33 Houdy 1667.22 1750.58 1838.10 1930.01 2026.51 Bi-weekly 3612.30 3792.91 3982.56 4181.69 4390.77 Monthly CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: June 21, 1995 Mayor, Member of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent~d~/ SUBJECT: TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF SPORT FIELD LIGHT POLICY FOR DATES JULY 5 - 19, 1995. RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends approval of a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow for light use until 11:30 p.m. on the Senior Field at Heritage and Red Hill Parks from July 5th through July 19, 1995 ( excluding Sundays) Game times are to be 5:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. for two game nights, and 6:00 p.m. for single game nights. BACKGROUND The current sports field light policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted. No complaints from residents have been received. Since this tournament is for older boys, play traditionally lasts 2.5. to 3 hours. In recent years the Council and Commission have approved a curfew variance only to accommodate extra inning play. ANALYSIS The requested variance would apply to only the 90 foot base path field located at the east side of Heritage Park and the northwest side of Red Hill Park. And staff requests the Council and Commission continue with their current policy of providing curfew variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings which is necessary for tournament play. The recreational baseball field at the Adult Sports Complex will also be in use for tournament but doe not require a variance of the light curfew due to the location of the park. Currently, one request is filed for use of the Equestrian Center. Alta Loma Riding Club will hold a local show which should end about 5:00 p.m. Therefore, staff believes no conflict of use will occur. Several picnic permits have be authorized for each park throughout this two week period. However, staff believes there will be no conflict of use or parking with the baseball games. As in the past, the League is to provide the City with a draft of the notice to the neighbors a minimum of two weeks prior to the games. This notice has been required by the Commission so that surrounding neighbors are aware that a variance has been permitted by the City to accommodate play and that any questions regarding use should be addressed to the City or league representatives. Once the draft is approved, the League must distribute to the neighbors who adjoin the park. A final tournament bracket should also be submitted to the City prior to June 29, 1995. Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 20, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, i FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PAVEMENT REItABILITATION PROGRAM. PItASE II On the Council Agenda for June 21 under Consent Calendar Item No. 11 is the approval to award Fiscal Year 1994/95 Pavement Rehabilitation Program, Phase II. Phase I, which was mostly slurry seals of existing street is almost complete. Phase II rehabilitates the following streets with asphalt overlay: 1. Base Line Road from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 2. Beryl Street from 19th Street to Banyan Street 3. Hellman Avenue from Cucamonga Creek to 6th Street 4. Highland Avenue from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue 5. Whittram Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Hickory Avenue Phase II also places a slurry seal on the following streets: 1. Base Line Road from Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue 2. Milliken Avenue from 4th Street to 6th Street 3. That area around the Neighborhood Center encompassing the area between Arrow Route on the north, 8th Street on the south, Archibald Avenue on the west and Hermosa Avenue on the east. Please refer to the attached Vicinity Map. Streets to be rehabilitated are selected based on the City's computerized Pavement Management Program. This program prioritizes and selects which streets should be repaired. After the selection, the various streets are revisited, and using engineeringjudgement the exact pavement repair is determined for each street. Also, included in the selection are various phone calls and/or letters from concerned citizens regarding the condition of certain streets. By staying in touch with citizens of the City and utilizing our Pavement Management Program, a planned, orderly program is being implemented for the repair of City streets. Fiscal 1995/96 has budgeted funds in it for continuing street repair. Amethyst Avenue between Base Line Road and 19th Street will be considered and evaluated. WJO:MO:sd Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: By: SUBJECT: June 21, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engi p~ Michael D. Long, Supervising orks Inspector AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENTS, TO MAHR CONSTRUCTION FOR THE AMOUNT OF $48,577.45 ($44,161.32, PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM CDBG ACCOUNT NO. 28-4333-9105 - ITEM D-12 Per previous City Council action, bids were received and opened on Thursday, June 15 at 10:00 AM. Three bids were received. There was an inconsistency with the bid from the apparent second low bidder, Hinkley and Associates. Although Hinkley's written bid total was $56,941.00, the actual total of the bid items is $40,113.40. Ron Svarc, from Hinkley and Associates, informed the City the difference is the addition of Hinkley's overhead and profit. Hinkley and Associates has been advised that their bid is non- responsive to the need of the City. Mahr Construction was the apparent low bidder with a bid of $44,161.32. See the attached bid summary. It is recommended that City Council reject the bid from Hinkley and Associates as non responsive to the needs of the City and accept the bids from Mahr Construction and Civil Trans Inc.. Also, it is recommended that City Council award the contract to Mahr Construction in the amount of $48,577.45 ($44,161.32 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from CDBG fund Account No. 28- 4333-9105. WJO:ML:dlw Attachment: Bid Summary 0 0 T H E ANCHO C June 19, 1995 Mr. Ron Svarc Hinldey and Associates 1235 Indiana Court, Suite No. 114 Redlands, CA 92374 T y O F CANONGA / a-r" / Subiect: Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Dear Mr. Svarc: During a review of vour bid for the subject project it was discovered the sum of the bid items, $40,113.40, did not equal the total bid amount of $56,941.00. When you were questioned about the discrepancy., you stated the difference was due to Hinkley and Associates markup for overhead and profit. Staff will recommend that the City Council reject your bid as non responsive to the needs of the City. Action on this recommendation is schedule for Wednesday, lune 21 at 7:00 PM. For future reference, any overhead and profit shall be included in the bid items unless there is a line item provided for such markups. Additionally, the total amount bid shall reflect the sum of all items bid and shall include no extras for ~vhich proposal items are not provided. Please refer any questions to me at (909) 989-1862, extension 2341. Sincerely, ,,,, ~ Michael D. Long Supervising Public Works Inspector Mayor William J. Alexander Councilmember Paul Biane Mayor Pro-Tem Rex Gutierrez 2--"-~,,~ _%., ' Councilmember James V. Curatalo Jack Lam, AICR City Manager ~i Councilmember Diane Willjams 10500 Civic Center Drive · P.O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 989-1851 · FAX (909) 987-6499 T H E C I T y R A N C H ~ C U C A 995 Mr. 1~on Svarc Hinkley and Associates 1235 Indiana Court, Suite :No. 114 Redlands, CA 92374 Subject: ~n~o Cuc~on~a Nei~borhood Cen~er De~ Mr. Sv~c: D~n~ a r~ of your bid ~or ~e subJ,~ project it was ~iseovere~ the s~ o~ ~he bi ~so~ates m~kup for overl~ead ~d pr,3~t, Ce was due to ~ Y~ey and St~ ~11 reco~end ~at ~:he City Cc,~l reJea yo~ bid as non respo~tve to ~e needs of ~e City. ~on or~ ~s recommen~on is s~ed~e ~or We~esd~y,/une 21 at 7:00 PM. For ~l~e referend, ~y overhead ~d profit sh~l be ~uded in ~e bid i~e~ts u~ess ~e is a Zinc item prodded For sua mar~ps. ~dition~y, ~e tot~ mo~t bid sh~l r~ea the s~ of ~ tte~ bid ~d sh~l include no ex~as for w~ propos~ items a~ not pr~ded. Please refer any ques~ons tc;~ me at (909) 989-1862. ~e~ion 23~1. Michael D- Long Supervising PubLic Works Inspector 0 F ,/,..,-/ A TRANSM I SS I ON REPORT TH I S DOCUMENT WAS SENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) COUNT 1 aSS SEND aSS NO REMOTE STATION I.D. 1 1 909 30? 0100 START TIME 6-19-95 10:58AM TOTAL DURATION #PAGES 0'57" 1 0:00'5?" 1 COMMENT XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEIMO June 21, 1995 Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City EngineS? COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D:13 - AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE... Please remove City Council Agenda Item D-13 because the bid exceeded the budgeted mount. This item xvill be brought back to Council in July to reappropriate sufficient funds. WJO:dlw j / April 22, 1994 CableVision Dear Valued Customer: Marks CableVision has been working hard to build a cable system that will take Rancho Cucamonga into the age of "The Information Superhighway" that everyone has read so much about. On or before June 1, 1994, Marks CableVision will be providing 62 channels of quality cable television entertainment throughout the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Many new popular channels will be available on your service including: HBO 2, HBO 3, AMERICA'S TALKING, COMEDY CENTRAL, COURT TV, KRCA, SPICE and MARKS HOME THEATER 1 AND 2. You will be receiving a new channel lineup card in the mail shortly. Within the next 60 days, Marks CableVision will be introducing addressable converter boxes to South Rancho. This will mark the very first time that South Rancho customers will have the ability to order Pay-Per-View events 24 hours a day. With a simple phone call, subscribers will be able to order world class sporting events, blockbuster movies and exclusive concerts. We look forward to bringing you these enhancements through new fiber optic cable which is currently he!ng installed throughout the city. Fiber optics transmit signals via tiny strands of glass no larger than a single strand of fishing line. As a custom· , you will see noticeable improvements in icture quality, reduced interference and fewer s~ice interruption. ]Vl'~rks CableVision wilfbe instalhng and activating more miles of fiber than any other cable company in the Inland Empire. Marks CableVision is sensitive about our service rates and is working hard to bring you the most for your money. On your June bill, rates for basic service will be adjusted to $23.65. ~This is the first adjustment to our rates in nearly two years. % Also, June I, we will be decreasing our price for additional outlets. Your second outlet will cost $4.00 per month. The third outlet will be just $3.00, and outlets four, five and six are ABSOLUTELY FREE! This will mean a substantial savings for many customers, and will be an incentive to those who have been considering the idea of wiring several rooms throughout the home. We appreciate your business and look forward to bringing your cable television service into the 21st century. Sincerely, Susan Booker, General Manager Marks CableVision 4240 N. Hallmark Pkwy. l O., 'ic 'a\ H,o,u.,,oL iqqq, · San Bernardino, CA 92407 · (909) 880-0231 · Fax: 880-0230 Cable Out Operator 9 6-13 6-13 6-16 8-29 8-29 9-2 9-2 9-9 9-11 9-12 9-15 9-18 9-25 6:30 am 9:00 am 2:26 pm 6:30 8:00 am 7:10 pm 6:10 pm 7:50 pm 5:20 pm 4:00 pm 1:00 pm 9:30 am 800 # not working Operator 17 picture horrible 9:00am - l:00pm 9:00 am Operator ? - wouldn't give info Picture Horrible No supervisor available, Juanita on vacation. Called City - Susan Nokee Picture Horrible Operator hung up on complaint Cable Out - DURING 10 minutes on hold Spoke to Mary Picture Horrible Karen, Supervisor Cust Service Referred to John Belchir Cable Out Marcy No idea how long 7:30 Picture is horrible, all channels Operator 15 Cable Out I hour Cable Out Operator 19 Cable Out Christine Picture Horrible Operator 19 Cable Out Cable Out, flickered for 30 miuutes Picture Horrible 2 hours Cable Out 10-6 6:25 pm Cable Out Helen Karen - Supervisor to call back 10-14 Cable out AM Picture Horrible when fLxed No supervisor called to date 11-2 Cable out Picture Horrible 6:00 am - 6:30 am 1-18 7:45 pm Out of town too much, couldn't check up on Marks Cable Out Unable to get through both 800 number and local # Gave up trying 10:35pm 1-19 10:04 am Called for credit Stella = .09 credit on bill CSad Fe_.~o -'Lf'*ave_\icr~ To: From: Date: Subject: Memorandum City Manager's Office June 19, 1995 Consideration of splitting the Inland Empire Division of the League of Califomia Cities There is a desire from certain Riverside County cities to split the Inland Empire Division of the League of California Cities and create a new Riverside County Division. This would require San Bernardino County cities to form its own division or join another division. The issue of splitting divisions have tended to be controversial with representatives making various pro and con arguments. This is a policy issue of City membership. Therefore, a meeting has been set for June 281h for Cities to indicate their preferences. The Division has asked all members to submit a resolution stating individual city positions and have a Council representative at the June 281h meeting to discuss this matter. In the past, San Bemardino County cities have not supported diluting the strength of the Inland Empire Division. The Exhibits attached are: 1. Memorandum from Sat Munoz, President of the Division 2. Resolution from Riverside County Mayors' and Council Members' Conference 3. Notice for June 281h Division meeting 4. Resolution from City of Grand Terrace Recommendation: City Council discuss the matter and take a position regarding proposed split of the Inland Empire Division of the League of Califomia Cities, and direct staff to prepare appropriate resolution for transmittal to the Division President. League of California Cities .wm Inland Empire Division MEMORANDUM Member Cilies TO: INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION MEMBER CITIES Banning Beaurnont Blythe Calirnesa Canyon Lake Cathedral CIIy Chino Chlno HIlls Coachella Colton Corona Desed Hot Springs Fontaria Grand Terrace Hernet HIghland Indian Wells Indlo la Quinta Lak~ Elsinore Lorna Linda Montclair Moreno Valley Murrleta Norco Ontado Palm Desert Palm Spdngs Pertie FROM: DATE: RE: J. SAL MUNOZ, PRESIDENT CITY OF TEMECULA JUNE1,1995 PROPOSED SPLITTING OF DIVISION As some of you may be aware, the Riverside Mayors and Councilmembers Conference recently passed a Resolution calling for the separation of Riverside County cities from the Inland Empire Division and the creation of a new Riverside County Division of the League of California Cities. This would mean that the San Bernardino cities would have to become their own division or join another division. (Enclosed is the proposed Resolution). In the past, this issue of splitting the Inland Empire Division has created controversy among the member cities, and yet there are good arguments pro and con. It is necessary to deal with this issue again in light of the above- mentioned Resolution. Therefore, we are dedicating the June 28th General Membership Meeting exclusively to this topic. It is important that all Inland Empire Division cities participate in this discussion, preferably at the June 28th meetini3, where all the arguments can be heard and weighed. Toward that end, I would ask that each of your Councils: (1) agendize this issue for discussion either prior to or after the June 28th meeting, or both; Rancho Cucarnonga ' (2) send a representative to the meeting; and (3) thereafter be prepared to submit a letter from the Mayor to this Division by July 24, 1995 stating Rancho Mirage Redlands Rialto RIverside San Bernardino San Jacinto Ternecula Upland Yucaipa whether or not your city supports the proposed split. The June 28th meeting will be held at the Red Lion Inn, Ontario Airport (specific announcement to follow). The letter from cities should be sent to Mayor Mike Wickman, City of Chino Hills, 2001 Grand Avenue, Chino Hills, CA 91709 (Phone: 909-590-1511 ). Please give this important issue your attention so that all cities' votes may be considered in making recommendations to the State League Office. This issue will likely be dealt with formally at the Annual Conference. A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY MAYORS' AND COUNCILMEMBERS' CONFERENCE SUPPORTING THE CREATION OF A SEPARATE' DIVISION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO BE DESIGNATED THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. VVhereas, Riverside County now has over one million residents and continues as one of the fastest growing counties in California; and VVhereas, the Riverside County Mayors and Councilmembers have many common concerns and problems; and VVhereas, there would be a Mayors' and Cotmc~membe~' orlpni-.jon which meets bi-monthly; and Whereas, there exists an opporumity for the new Riverside County Division of the League of California Cities to meet concurrmtdy and elimY.re the need for six meetln~ per year; and Whereas, in so doinF~ there would be an opportunity to increase attendnnce and activity because of the common interests. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that there be a separate Division of the · of California cities desi ted as the Riverside County Division of the League of California Citi~;L~ It Further Resolv~,~ the existing treasury be split between the two separate Divisions. ATTEST: Passed, Approved, and Adopted by the Mayors and CoHnciimembers' Conference of River- side County at its regular meeting held m Palm Desert, California, on the 17th day of March~ 1995. by unanimous vote of the membership present. JUDITH BAITINGER, SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY MAYORS' & COUNCK2VlEMB~' CONFERENCE League of California Cities Inland Empire Division GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING NOTICE JUNE 28, 1995 Member Cltles Banning Beaurnont Blythe Callmesa Canyon Lake Cathedral CIty Chlno Chino Hgls Coachella Coltan Corona Chased Hot Sl~lng: Fontana Grand Terrace Hernet Highland Inalan Wells Indlo La Qulnta Lake Elslnore Loma Unda Montclair Moreno Valley Muffeta Norco Ontado Pclm Palm Perrls Rancho Cucarnonga Rancho MIrage Redlands Rialto Rlve~slae San Bernaralno San Jaclnto Temecula Upland Yucaipa TIME: PLACE: PROGRAM: 6:30 p.m. - Networking Hour 7:00 p.m. - Dinner 8:00 p.m. - Program Red Lion Hotel/Ontario 222 North Vineyard From I-10 Freeway, south on Vineyard one block, left on D Street, fight into parking lot. AN IMPORTANT DISCUSSION will be held on the Riverside Mayors and Councilmembers Conference proposed resolution calling for the separation of Riverside cities from the Inland Empire Division and the creation of a new Riverside County Division of the League of California Cities. Your input is essential on this issue. All arguments, pro and con, will be heard and weighed. Member Mayors will be requested to send a letter to the President of the Inland Empire Division by July 24, 1995, stating their City Council's position on the issue. 86/15/1998 10:06 9097837629 GRAND TERRACE PAGE 01 City of Grand Terrace Facsimile Transmittal Sheet CI V IC CENTER OF GRAND TERRACE Member Cities of the League of Calif. Cities - To: Inland ~.tpirc D4vis~on Dire: 6-14-95 Attn: M~,3FoT. n{ ~r ~.~,,~1 an~ CiCy ~na~er From: ~.~ f~, M~o~ ~na City Co~cil ~b FAX i~~ 2 ~q~, In~ng ~s ~ansmMd sit. NO;S: 22795 BARTON ROAD GIlANO TERRACE, CA 92324 FAX 909- 783- 7629 PH. 909-824662 1 RESOLUTION 9S- It A RESOLIJTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE THE CITY OF GRAND TElRACE OPPOSING THE SPI,IT OF THE INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES INTO SEPARATE RIVERSIDE AND 8AN BERNARDINO COUNTY DMSIONS. WHEREAS, there is a current proposal to split the Inland Empirc Division of the League of California Citiem into two separate Rlvenkk aud San Ikruardino County Divisior~: and Wt[EII~,AS, ther~ axe conmi~krable dforts ~gin~ the Counties of Riverside and San Ikrnardino to J~datly maxir~t tl~ "Inland Empire" cour. q~: and V~S, splittitlg the Division will ~vcf the last organized political interaction bctwccn Council Members in Riverside and San Bemardino Countics; and WHEREAS, this issu~ has always be_ _-~l_ ddeateci when it has been proposcd in the past; and WHEREAS, splitti~ the Division will not incrzasc our voice in Sacramento NOW, THEREFOKE, BE IT KESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Grand Terrace is oppom~d to any efforts to split the Inland Empire Division of the League of California Cities. ADOPTED this 8m day of ~u,~, 1995. and tIM City Council thereof. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and the City Council thereof.