Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/11/05 - Agenda Packet~~ 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City office: (909) 477-2700 ~~END AS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15t and 3`~ Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. NOVEMBER 5, 2008 MEMBER5 MAYOR Donald J. Kurth, M.D. MAYOR PRO TEM L. Dennis Michael COUNCIL MEMBERS Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY ACTING CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Kathryn L. Scott, CMC ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC RANCxo CUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELDPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVE P A LO MENT GENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 jZANCxo NOVEMBER 5, 2008 ~UCAMONGA A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER -TAPIR ROOM 1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUlvICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH AND ARBOR LANE; AGS HOMEBUILDER 1, LLC, AND LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT- RDA 2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 6TH STREET, EAST OF 115 FREEWAY; GENERAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING; LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF PROPOSAL -RDA E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVEL PMENT A EN CY, O G FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 NOVEMBER 5, 2008 j{ANCxo ~UCAMONGA G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CxAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a $2,000.00 check to the City for a grant from Target Department Stores to conduct a "Merchant Awareness Academy' by the Police Department in 2009. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ NOVEMBER 5, 2008 3 J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2008 (Regular Meeting) September 3, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Kurth & Gutierrez absent) 1 2. Approval of Check Register dated October 8 through October 28, 2008, for the total amount of $2,593,400.00. 3. Approval for award and authorize the increase to contract 02-065 in the amount of 4 $198,070.00 to URS Corporation, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,807.00 for construction support services for the Haven Avenue Underpass Capital Project, to be funded from 2001 Public Improvement Tax Allocation funds, Acct. No. 2650801-5650/1355650-6314 and appropriate $217,877.00 (contract award of $198,070.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $19,807.00) to Acct. No. 2650801-5650/1355650-6314 from 2001 Public Improvement Tax Allocation fund balance. 4. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Hunt Design (RA 08-029) to provide 6 wayfinding design and consulting services in the amount of $36,100.00 with a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,610.00, to be funded from Acct. No. 2620801-5110. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2008 (Regular Meeting) September 3, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Kurth & Gutierrez absent) 8 2. Approval of Check Register dated October 8 through October 28, 2008, for the total amount of $181,060.15. 3. Approval to accept a donation of four (4) used SCBA air packs to be used for training 14 purposes valued at $800.00 from Reliant Power Plant. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2008 (Regular Meeting) September 3, 2008 (Regular Meeting -Kurth & Gutierrez absent) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA 4 _ NOVEMBERS, 2OOH 2. Approval of Check Register dated October 8 through October 28, 2008, for the total amount 15 of $8,304,572.67. 3. Approval of a recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission to approve the 71 street banner schedule and applications for calendar year 2009. 4. Approval to order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for PMT2008- 98 01332, located at 8770 Vinmar Avenue, submitted by Victor Martinez and Arciela Martinez. RESOLUTION NO. 08-211 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR 8770 VINMAR AVENUE (APN: 0207-242-18) 5. Approval to accept a $2,000.00 grant from Target Department Stores to be utilized to 107 conduct the 2009 Merchant Awareness Course. 6. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda Sevaine Area Master Plan for FY 109 2007/2008 and appropriation of $113,285.50 to Acct. No. 1 1 1 6303-5650/1 0261 1 6-0. 7. Approval of a Resolution to designate the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services as the City's Authorized Agent to execute and file the Medicare Application Form, and conduct 110 all matters relative to the City's application for Medicare coverage under Section 218 of the Social Security Act. RESOLUTION NO. 08-212 111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO DESIGNATE THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AS THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED AGENT TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO OUR APPLICATION FOR MEDICARE COVERAGE, INCLUDING THE EXECUTION AND FILING OF "APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT, PERS-MED-32 D FORM." 8. Approval of a purchase of twenty-four (24) Motorola radios and accessories from Motorola 114 utilizing the LA County Contract #43070 in the amount of $57,438.10 to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5200 (EquipmentNehicle Replacement) and $11,717.62 from Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Capital Outlay-Vehicles). 9. Approval of the purchase of six (6) Ford Escape XLS hybrid vehicles as per request for 115 Quote #110022 from Sunrise Ford of Fontana in the amount of $185,005.16, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Vehicle Replacement Fund). 10. Approval of Mills Act Application for DRC2008-00661 by Michael J. Vizio and Margaret A. 116 Vizio to implement the use of the Mills Act (CO 08-177) to reduce property tax for the Adams House, a historic landmark, located a# 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive -APN 0207-073-09. Related file: Landmark Designation No. 29 per Resolution No. 88-288. AGENCY R , EDEVELOPMENT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 08-213 129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2008-00661, A REQUEST TO IMPLEMENT THE USE OF THE MILLS ACT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAX FOR THE ADAMS HOUSE, A HISTORIC PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE, APN: 0207-073-09 11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 17487 and 17840, located south 144 of Church Street and east of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Shea Homes, LP. RESOLUTION NO. 08-214 147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 17487 AND 17840 12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2003-00199, located 148 on the southwest corner of Sebastian and Rochester, submitted by YNS Enterprises, No. 2, LLC. 13. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 150 Maintenance bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2004-01244, located at the northeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Drive, submitted by Abundant Living Family Church. RESOLUTION NO. 08-215 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-01244 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 14. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2004-00897 (PM 153 17988), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard between Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, submitted by Jersey Partners, LLC. 15. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 155 Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16226-1, located at the northerly terminus of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc. 157 RESOLUTION NO. 08-216 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16226-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 _ NOVEMBER 5, 2008 16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 15$ Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16227, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard between Indian Wells Place and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian at Rancho Etiwanda, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 08-217 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16227 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 17. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for Parcel Map 16488, 161 located on the north side of Laurel Street, between Red Oak Street and Aspen Avenue, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc. 18. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for Parcel Map 16574, 163 located on the southwest corner of Teak Way and Ironwood Street, submitted by Martinez Properties, LLC. 19. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16372 (traffic signal), located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by 165 Victoria Arbors, LLC. 20. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bonds, Nos. 104809465 and 190017193, 167 retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $77,818.55 for the Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, Contract No. 07-017. 21. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 726913P, retained in lieu of a 169 Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $255,000.00 for the Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa, Contract No. 07-076. 22. Approval to accept the Fiscal Year 2007/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Overlay 171 of Various Streets, Contract No. 08-051 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and approve the final contract amount of $753,194.06. RESOLUTION NO. 08-218 174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 08-051 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 23. Approval of a Public Convenience of Necessity Determination - DRC2008-00475 -Fresh 175 and Easy Market - A request to issue a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination for a Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 20 License; and Off-Sale General License for a grocery store in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue approximately 250 feet north of Town Center Drive - APN: 1077- 422-93. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. 08-219 186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONSIDERATION OF A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2008-00475 FOR A DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) TYPE 20 OFF-SALE GENERAL LICENSE FOR A GROCERY STORE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET NORTH OF TOWN CENTER DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-422-93 24. Approval of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Neighborhood Stabilization 188 Program funding allocation for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, DRC2008-00845 -City of Rancho Cucamonga - A review of the federally required substantial amendment to the currently approved Consolidated Plan and Action Plan, including the selection of Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funded project, based on a new grant allocation of $2,133,397. M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING ANNEXATION OF 209 TERRITORY (CRE 7, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY -APN 0208- 101-22,23,24&25 -ANNEXATION NO. 08-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS. RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-036 212 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 08-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1 ), CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 2008 8 N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES 219 DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CSCDA) FOR THE BENEFIT OF MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. RESOLUTION NO. 08-221 222 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION OF LICENSED HEALTH CARE FACILITIES BY MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT 227 AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 800 (first reading) 423 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935, A REQUEST TO AMEND PART II, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.24.300 OF THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS BY ADDING SECTION .304 UNDER CONDITIONAL USES, THEREBY PERMITTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND BOAT STORAGE AND SELF STORAGE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, SUBJECT TO BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND ADJACENT TO THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 2008 3. 432 RESOLUTION NO. 08-210 434 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING CERTAIN ANIMAL SERVICES FEES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DIRECTOR TO WAIVE ANIMAL SERVICES FEES AND PENALTIES BASED ON HARDSHIP 4. 00160 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre} and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Development Design Review and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 437 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN 437 AMENDMENT DRC 2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.783 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 areas of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dulacre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review, DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION N0.08-220 554 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM- HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ NOVEMBER 5, 2008 10 ORDINANCE NO. 801 (first reading) 559 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161, A REQUEST TO AMEND LAND USE PLAN (FIGURE III-17} DESIGNATION OF 14.73 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422- 01, 46, AND 93 O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 1. PRESENTATION OF NEW WEB BASED APPLICATION ON RCPARK.COM PROMOTING THE "HEALTHY RC COMMUNITY CHALLENGE." (Oral Presentation) P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT I, Kathryn L. Scott, Acting City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 30, 2008, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. August 20, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a closed session on Wednesday, August 6, 2008, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. by Chairman Donald J. Kurth. Present were Agencymembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman L. Dennis Michael and Chairman Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: Jack Lam, Executive Director; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director. i1h1e1R B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Chairman Kurth announced the closed session items: B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF I- 15 FREEWAY, FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CA, INC., & LEWIS INVESTMENT CO., LLC; LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT -RDA 82. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE, AND CENTER AVENUE. LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY-RDA C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S No one was present to comment on the closed session items. F4i1~i1 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 6:20 p.m. E. _CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 2 F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:20 p.m. with no action taken. G. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council was held on Wednesday, July 16, 2008, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/ PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel/City Attorney; Erika Lewis- Huntley, Management Analyst II; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Mike Toy, Information Services Specialist I; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; James Troyer, Planning Director; Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner; Dave Blevins, Director of Public Works Services; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Chief Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; and Kathryn L. Scott, Acting City Clerk. H.. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS - There were no announcements/presentations. _..... I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Frank Annunziato discussed the community contributions and activities of the Sons of Italy. He encouraged new members and invited the Council and community to the Sons of Italy Membership and Pasta Dinner on September 20, 2008. 12. Scott da Rosa requested the Council stop issuance of concert permits at Golden Oak Park due to the proximity of his home and disturbance from the noise. He displayed a map of the park and surrounding homes. In response to Councilmember Spagnolo, Mr. da Rosa indicated an organization was putting on the event. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 3 In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. DeRosa stated the event he was referring to occurred in August. He requested large events not be allowed at Golden Oak Park. 13. Raymond Herrera, Minute Men Project, discussed his support of the Mayor during his campaign. He addressed the Council regarding illegal aliens. He explained who the Minute Men were and that their mission was to ensure American posterity. He discussed the impacts created by illegal aliens. He urged the people of Rancho Cucamonga to think about who they vote for. 14. Robin Hvidston, National Rally Spokesman for the Minute Men project, stated they staged rallies at the day laborer site and were attempting to shut the day laborer site down. She requested the City ban together with other cities to work to do something about the day laborer site. 15. John Lyons stated the car show was great. He discussed increased use of the bicycle trail. He addressed the Council regarding the banner program and thanked the Council committee for obtaining a private donor to pay for the program. 16. Dee Barrow addressed the Council regarding the sanctuary cities surrounding Rancho Cucamonga. She expressed concern regarding gang activity in surrounding cities. She stated efforts were made to prevent San Juan Capistrano from becoming a sanctuary city. 17. Leslie Grimes expressed confusion regarding the uproar over the banners. She stated it was not necessary to go outside the City for funding. She stated Rancho Cucamonga residents were wiling to contribute towards funding of the banners. J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J1. Approval of Check Register dated July 30 through August 12, 2008, for the total amount of $1,626, 628.51. J2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule for months ending June 30 and July 31, 2008. J3. Approval to award a contract renewal (CO 08-013 / RA 08-006) with Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., for citywide graffiti abatement services for Fiscal Year 2008/09, with the option to renew for additional one-year periods (up to four years total), upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent by the City Manager and Contractor, in an annual amount of $75,000 with no increase in hourly rates, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and Acct. No. 2620801-5300 ($26,250). J4. Approval of a modifcation to the First-Time Homebuyer Program to include the requirement that homes that are purchased are located within the Redevelopment Project Area and be considered real estate owned properties. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Michael, seconded by Councilmember Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. ...... K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 4 K1. Approval of Check Register dated July 30 through August 12, 2008, for the total amount of $137,431.29. K2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule for months ending June 30 and July 31, 2008. K3. Approval to accept a donation in the amount of $2,500.00 from Patricia Wells to be used for Emergency Medical Services. K4. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. of Irwindale, California, for the maintenance of city parks and city and fire district landscape sites, in the amount not to exceed $1,398,956 for city facilities and $65,750 for fire district facilities with the option to renew for additional one-year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent of the City Manager for city facilities, the Fire Chief for fire district facilities and the Contractor; to be funded from various General Fund accounts ($451,286), San Bernardino County Reimbursement account ($85,500), Park Development account ($27,300), Landscape Maintenance District accounts ($805,070), CFD 868 account ($29,800), and Fire District accounts ($65,750) as approved in the fiscal year 2008/2009 budget. K5. Consideration of a resolution declaring the results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District NO. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-08-3 (a proposal to build a residential subdivision development located in the vicinity of Snowdrop Road and Hermosa Avenue). RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-3 MOTION: Moved by Mayo Pro Tem Michael, seconded by Councilmember Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. .»_... L. CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Check Register dated July 30 through August 12, 2008, and payroll ending August 12, 2008, for the total amount of $7,276,919.53. L2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule for months ending June 30 and July 31, 2008. L3. Approval to authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Tree Maintenance and to be funded from the Street and Park Maintenance Fund and Landscape Maintenance District funds and authorize the City Manager to award a contract tc the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. RESOLUTION NO. 08-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE" AND Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 5 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Tin Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from Measure "I" funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1630176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 08-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 7TH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the Wilson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to Canistel Avenue, to be funded from Measure "I" funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1628176-0 and Prop. 1 B funds, Acct. No. 1194303- 5650/1708194-0. RESOLUTION NO. 08-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WILSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO CANISTEL AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L6. Approval of Community Services Update Report. L7. Approval of a request to summarily vacate excess street right-of-way on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue, V-214 -APN: 209-021-31. RESOLUTION NO. 08-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL AVENUE, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE L8. Approval to purchase tax-defaulted property pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter 8, of the Revenue and Taxation Code for property along Milliken Avenue adjacent to Central Park used for street, highway and related purposes and identified as APN: 1076- 591-12 for the total sum of $4,000.00, to be funded from Acct. No. 1131303-5600 and Acct. No. 1001305-5600, and request approval of an appropriation of $3,294.00 to Acct. No. 1131303-5600 and $706.00 to Acct. No. 1001305- 5600. RESOLUTION NO. 08-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY L9. Approval to renew a contract with ABM Janitorial Services (CO 06-180) cleaning of citywide facilities in the amount of $723,845.00 ($653,845 annual contract plus $70,000 extra work allowance) with Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 6 the option to renew for additional one-year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent of the City Manager and Contractor, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001312-5304 (Contract Services, Facilities) and 1700201-5304 (Contract Services, Facilities). L10. Approval to award a contract renewal (CO 07-124) to Ellis Enterprises of Los Alamitos for window cleaning services for various city facilities for fiscal year 2008/2009, with the option to renew for an additional two (2) years in one (1) year increments upon mutual consent by the City Manager and Contractor, in an annual amount of $81,720.00 plus $10,000.00 extra work, with no cost increase for fiscal year 2008/2009, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001312- 5304. L11. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. of Irwindale, California, for the maintenance of city parks and city and fire district landscape sites, in the amount not to exceed $1,398,956 for city facilities and $65,750 for fire district facilities with the option to renew for additional oneyear periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent of the City Manager for city facilities, the Fire Chief for fire district facilities and the Contractor; to be funded from various General Fund accounts ($451,286), San Bernardino County Reimbursement account ($85,500), Park Development account ($27,300), Landscape Maintenance District accounts ($805,070), CFD 868 account ($29,800), and Fire District accounts ($65,750) as approved in the fiscal year 2008/2009 budget. L12. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 90-143, 90-144, 93-041, 93-080, 02-018) with Trugreen Landcare of Upland, California, for the maintenance of various landscape sites citywide, in the amount not to exceed $2,719,610.00 with the option to renew for additional one year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent of the City Manager and Contractor to be funded from various General Fund accounts ($35,450), Foothill Boulevard Maintenance account ($2,000) and Landscape Maintenance District accounts ($2,682,160), as approved in the fiscal year 2008/2009 budget. L13. Approval to award a contract renewal (CO 08-013 / RA 08-006) with Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Inc., for citywide graffiti abatement services for fiscal year 2008/2009, with the option to renew for additional one-year periods (up to four years total), upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent by the City Manager and Contractor, in an annual amount of $75,000.00 with no increase in hourly rates, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($48,750) and Acct. No. 2620801-5300 ($26,250). LI14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2005- 00831, located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road, submitted by Gene Corpus and Elizabeth Corpus. RESOLUTION NO. OS-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2005- 00831 RESOLUTION NO. 08-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2005-00831 L15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security for Parcel Map Number 18680, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue, submitted by the William Fox Group, Inc., and release of Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 7 previously-submitted improvement agreement and improvement securities accepted by the City Council on August 16, 2006, from Eagle Family Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. OS-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 18680 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18680) RESOLUTION NO. 08- 183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PARCEL MAP NUMBER 18680 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 16, 2006 L16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16113, located on the southwest corner of Wilson and East Avenues, submitted by Trimark Pacifc Rancho Cucamonga, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. OS-184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16113 L17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16226 & 16227 (north property line channel), located north of the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by JTY Investment, LLC. L18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16226-1, located at the northerly terminus of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 08-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16226-1 L19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16421, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry Street, Street, submitted by Shone and Sherry Wang. L20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16643, located on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. L21. Approval to accept the Alfreda Ward Maloof Greenbelt project, Contract No. 07-211 as complete, retain the Faithful Pertormance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1, 058,404.45. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 08-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ALFREDA WARD MALOOF GREENBELT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-211 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Spagnolo, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Michael to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. M. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS' M1. CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00625 - OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS ON BEHALF OF T-MOBILE USA - A request to amend the Development Code to allow wireless communication facilities within the public right of way within 300 feet of residential zones. Associate Planner Jennifer Nakamura, presented the staff report. The Council had no questions. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Michael, seconded by Councilmember Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. M2. CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow for synthetic turf. Associate Planner Jennifer Nakamura presented the staff report. Mayor Kurth discussed water savings with synthetic turf. Jennifer Nakamura clarified the amount of water use. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Jennifer Nakamura explained that the requested action was to clarify the definition of landscaping to include synthetic turf. In response to Mayor Kurth, Jennifer Nakamura explained the rebate structure offered. Councilmember Spagnolo requested an education program be implemented to inform residents of the rebate. Councilmember Williams asked if there would be criteria on the types of turf used. City Manager Lam discussed the use of synthetic turf at fire stations and the advancements in technology. He stated the product was available and use was timely. In response to Mayor Kurth, Jennifer Nakamura stated a permit was not required for rehabilitating landscaping. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 9 Councilmember Gutierrez requested research be done to ensure the best product was used. He suggested exploration of the possibility of the use of turf at some of the City parks. Councilmember Spagnolo discussed the different qualities and costs associated with various turfs. Mayor Pro Tem Michael discussed the cost of water and need to conserve. He suggested conducting a cost analysis to allow the public to see the cost for the turf and cost savings. MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Michael to approve the staff recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. ..._.. N. COUNCIL BUSINESS N1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo announced the OPARC fundraiser on September 15, 2008 and encouraged residents to participate in the golf tournament and volunteer if possible. He reminded residents to attend the Sons of Italy fundraiser. Councilmember Gutierrez discussed the Council subcommittee work on issues of solicitation. He reminded residents that it was unacceptable for people to come to doors to solicit after dark. He suggested residents call the police if they encountered aggressive solicitors. He discussed the permit requirements. He reminded residents tc take in their garbage cans. He discussed issues with lack of upkeep of landscaping. He stated garage sale signs had to be removed once over and were not to be put on telephone poles. He encouraged residents to participate in maintaining the City to keep it looking as nice as possible. Mayor Pro Tem Michael discussed the use of community parks and requested staff evaluate the use of parks based on Mr. da Rosa's comments. He discussed the California State Budget and potential loss of redevelopment funding. He discussed projects completed utilizing redevelopment funding. He expressed his appreciation to those legislators that would not take local funding. Councilmember Williams discussed the opportunity for grant funding for the installation of bike racks. She stated the banner program donor wished to remain anonymous. She discussed her challenge to the local State legislators to show her how they were making cuts and assisting with the budget deficit. She discussed the changes and efforts of the local legislators. Mayor Kurth disdussed his recent meeting with the Housing and Urban Development Agency to discuss the housing crisis. He discussed potential solutions to assist people struggling with their mortgages. He expressed dissatisfaction with the State budget process. He stated it was not right for the State to utilize local funds to balance its budget. He stated the solution was to cut spending. He encouraged residents to support the City's state legislators in their efforts. O. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes August 20, 2008 Page 10 Mayor Pro Tem Michael discussed the Landscape Alliance Task Force and model ordinance on water conservation. He requested the City Manager begin working with those agencies that are putting together the reports and present the task force work to the City Council. .._.,. P. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Gutierrez discussed the work of Dee Murray on behalf of mobile home park owners and stated she had passed away. He requested adjourning the meeting in her honor. Mayor Kurth, after a moment of silence for Dee Murray, adjourned the meeting. The time was 8:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Acting City Clerk Minutes prepared by Lisa Pope Minute By Minute Transcription (805)208-8473 Approved: September 3, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A2' CALL TO ORDER '"` The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a closed session on Wednesday, September 3, 2008, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. by Vice Chairman Michael. Present were Agencymembers: Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, and Vice Chairman L. Dennis Michael Also present were: Jack Lam, Executive Director; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director. Absent: Agencymember Rex Gutierrez and Chair Donald J. Kurth i 4 # ~F Y . . B.: ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) . Vice Chairman Michael announced the closed session item 61. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF 115 FREEWAY, FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CA, INC., & LEWIS INVESTMENT CO., LLC; LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT-RDA C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)" ` No one was present to comment on the closed session item. •,t++~• D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION , Closed session began at 5:05 p.m. ..._.. E. CITY. MANAGER ANIVOUNCEME~NTS Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 2 F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:40 p.m. with no action taken. ...... G. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council was held on Wednesday, September 3, 2008, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, and Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel/City Attorney; Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst; Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Mike Nelson, Economic Development Manager; Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs Manager; Tony Le-Ngoc, RDA Analyst II; Donna Vega, RDA Analyst I; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Mike Toy, Information Services Specialist I; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; James Troyer, Planning Director; Dave Blevins, Director of Public Works Services; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Assistant Library Director; Michelle Perera, Library Services Manager; Chief Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; and Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk. Absent were Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Rex Gutierrez and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth ,,..,. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing September 6'" as "Rancho Cucamonga Day at the Fair." Scott Kelly, representing the LA County Fair, announced the 86'" Annual Fair. He discussed Rancho Cucamonga Day at the Fair on September 6, 2008. Mayor Pro Tem Michael presented a proclamation to Mr. Kelly recognizing September 6'" as "Rancho Cucamonga Day at the Fair." Mr. Kelly presented eco-friendly bags to the Council and encouraged residents to visit the going "Green" booth. Councilmember Williams discussed the volunteer efforts of Bob Curtis. She stated he would be honored as the City's Community Hero at the LA County Fair on September 6. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated Mary Faheem was also being honored as a junior Community Hero for her volunteerism. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 3 H2. Update regarding the Archibald Remodel Opening on September 13, 2008 Assistant Library Director Robert Karatsu provided an overview of the Archibald Library. Library Services Manager Michelle Perera explained the purpose of the remodel. Mr. Karatsu presented some of the remodel elements. Ms. Perera announced the grand reopening on September 13, 2008, 9:30 a.m. Mr. Karatsu encouraged residents to attend the grand reopening. Councilmember Williams thanked the School District. Mr. Karatsu discussed the use of the temporary facility at Central School. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Karatsu indicated the Archibald Library would be open on Sundays. ..,... I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Terry Masl, President of the Inland Valley Democratic Club, expressed concern regarding the gridlock in Sacramento holding the State budget hostage. He stated it was unwise to borrow against the future. He stated City funds should not be used to balance the State budget. He questioned why Senator Dutton and Assemblymember Emerson were being supported while invading the City coffers. He urged the Council to protect the City. 12. Steven Alvarez indicated support for Proposition 5, the non-violent rehabilitation act. He discussed the benefits of Proposition 5. He discussed his uncle's negative experience with drugs. He urged residents to vote in favor of Proposition 5. 13. John Lyons stated he would vote for Senator Dutton and Assemblymember Emerson. He discussed the poor economy and State budget crisis. He discussed money spent on illegal immigrants. He stated he had been utilizing the bike trail frequently. He stated dogs were being walked on the trail as well. J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY City Attorney Markman clarified that under Item No, J2, the Agency Board was being asked to: A) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the DDA and the modified Loan Agreement associated with the Rancho Workforce Housing Project B) make a finding to the effect that without the subordination to the tenant regulations that are contained in the agreement subordinating them to the senior lien holders, that financing for the project would not be available on the same economically comparable terms and conditions; and C) authorize and instruct the staff to make any non-substantive changes in the project documents which are necessary to close the transaction and consummate it. J1. Approval of Check Register dated August 13 through August 26, 2008, for the total amount of $1, 245, 038.94. J2. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Development and Disposition Agreement (RA 08007) and Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (RA 08008) associated with the Rancho Workforce Housing Project generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 4 MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Spagnolo, seconded by Councilmember Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3-0-2, Mayor Kurth and Councilmember Gutierrez absent. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Check Register dated August 13 through August 26, 2008, for the total amount of $30,402.89. MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Spagnolo, seconded by Councilmember Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3-0-2, Mayor Kurth and Councilmember Gutierrez absent. L. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL Mayor Pro Tem Michael pulled Item Nos. L3 and L4 in order to allow staff from the Library to highlight the grants. Librarian Deborah Clark addressed the Council regarding the grants received which allowed additional services to be provided at the library. She announced the Big Read Program, highlighting the Maltese Falcon. Mayor Pro Tem Michael commended staff to obtaining grants and improving services. L1. Approval of Check Register dated August 13 through August 26, 2008, and payroll ending August 12, 2008, for the total amount of $5,314,620.83. L2. Approval of a request from American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) Region 65 for a waiver of fees and charges for use of the soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Adult Sports Complex on September 6, 2008, for their picture day. L3. Approval to allocate $12,000.00 received from Metlife into Revenue Acct. No. 1290000474003701; appropriate $3,000.00 into Library Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015100; $4,000.00 into Library Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015200; and $5,000.00 into Library Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015300; allocate $15,000.00 received from the Library Foundation to Revenue Acct. No. 12900004907; appropriate $15,000.00 into Library Expenditure Acct. No. 12906075300. L4. Approval to allocate $25,000.00 awarded by the California State Library into Library Revenue Acct. No. 12900004740/03701 and appropriate $10,000.00 into Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015160; appropriate $4,000.00 into Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015100; appropriate $11,000.00 into Expenditure Acct. No. 12906015200; allocate $40,000.00 donated by the Library Foundation into Revenue Acct. No. 1290004740/03701 and appropriate $40,000.00 into Expenditure Acct. No. 13026015300. L5. Approval of a Tolling Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino (CO 08137) concerning property tax administration fees. L6. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 08187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES L7. Approval to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement for energy services by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Viasyn, Inc., (CO 08138) subject to any modifications approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035209. L8. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16592, located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 08188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16592 L9. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC200400656, located on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Rochester Court, submitted by Mangini Development. L10. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond far DRC200400721, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 7 ~n Street, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC & Milliken / Greystone Properties, LLC. L11. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, accept a Maintenance cash deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 17423, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway, submitted by CIP Gateway 1 & 2, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 08189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 17423 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L12. Approval to accepted improvements, release the Faithful Performance cash deposit, accept a Maintenance cash deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 18209, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by RockJersey, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 08190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 18209 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L13. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 16899, located on the south side of 9 m Street, east of Lion Street, submitted by Cecil R. Carney, Cathy A. Carney and Shucri I. Yaghi. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 6 L14. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 147592 (Rancho Summit Park), located east of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. L15. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16306, located on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive, submitted by Young California Cucamonga, L.P. L16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16466 (Storm Drain), located north of Banyan Street between Etiwanda and Bluegrass Avenues, submitted by Carriage Estates III, LLC. MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3-0-2, Mayor Hurth and Councilmember Gutierrez absent. liki,lF . M: CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS M1. INTRODUCTION OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF AND AN OVERVIEW OF REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES (Oral) Redevelopment Director Daniels explained the purpose of the Redevelopment Agency including capital infrastructure, economic development, and housing. Economic Development Manager Mike Nelson explained the program areas under economic development. Housing Programs Manager Tranda Drumwright introduced members of the housing portion of the Redevelopment Agency staff. Redevelopment Director Daniels discussed the potential of losing $15 million if the State took away Redevelopment Funds. Mayor Pro Tem Michael thanked the Redevelopment Agency Department. He mentioned projects throughout the City that had been built and funded through the Redevelopment Agency. He expressed dissatisfaction with the State considering taking redevelopment funds. He stated the City's local legislators had indicated opposition for taking local revenues. a••r~~w N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS N1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo announced the Sons of Italy Pasta Dinner fundraiser on September 20, 2008. He announced the OPARC Golf Tournament on September 15, 2008. He discussed the 911 Remembrance Service at the Draper Mortuary. N4. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) Councilmember Williams discussed the lack of adoption of a State budget. She discussed the Governor's proposal to shift redevelopment funds. She discussed past efforts regarding Proposition 1A and ensuring Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 7 redevelopment agency monies were protected. She stated redevelopment funds were supposed to be constitutionally protected. City Attorney Markman explained challenges of redevelopment funds. Councilmember Williams provided examples of projects completed by the City's Redevelopment funds. She discussed the City's efforts to participate in ensuring the City's funds were not taken away. She encouraged residents to contact Assemblymembers and Senators to request City funds not be used to balance the State budget. N1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) (CONTINUED) Mayor Pro Tem Michael announced the Special Meeting on September 16, 2008 at which Little Leaguers would be recognized. He discussed the Link Program, assisting shut-in, sick and low income seniors during the holidays and he encouraged residents to support the program. N2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING TWO APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Councilmember Williams stated 28 applications were received. She stated 6 individuals were interviewed. Councilmember Spagnolo recommended Curtis Bray and Patricia Morris be appointed to the Park and Recreation Commission. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Michael, seconded by Councilmember Williams to appoint Curtis Bray and Patricia Morris to the Park and Recreation Commission. The motion carried 3-0-2, Mayor Kurth and Councilmember Gutierrez absent. N3. APPROVAL OF VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS Principal Management Analyst Fabian Villenas presented the resolutions to be considered at the upcoming League of California Cities Annual Conference. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated Councilmember Spagnolo, the City's voting representative, would be present at the League meeting. He recommended allowing Councilmember Spagnolo to vote at the conference based on the testimony at the conference. Councilmember Williams concurred. She discussed instances when resolutions were amended. She indicated support for allowing Councilmember Spagnolo to vote on the Council's behalf. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to allow Councilmember Spagnolo to represent the City and vote on its behalf at the League of California Cities Annual Conference. N4. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) Mayor Pro Tem Michael provided an update on bus transit services. He stated ridership was increasing and the mass transit system was being utilized. Councilmember Williams discussed increased use of Metrolink services. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes September 3, 2008 Page 8 O. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. ...... P. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated the next regular meeting would be held on September 17, 2008. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Acting City Clerk Minutes prepared by Lisa Pope Minute By Minute Transcription (805) 208-8473 Approved: RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273825 10/8/2008 ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST 34.95 AP - 00273841 10/8/2008 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 580.00 AP - 00273897 10/8/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 425.61 AP - 00273901 10/8/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 289.85 AP - 00273901 10/8/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 43,213.99 AP - 00273902 10/8/2008 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 69,370.16 AP - 00273903 10/8/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 2,094.75 AP - 00273906 10/8/2008 GAMUT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 529,992.20 AP - 00273906 10/8/2008 GAMUT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC -52,999.22 AP - 00273911 10/8/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 173.00 AP - 00273911 10/8/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 1,073.46 AP - 00273913 10/8/2008 GLOBAL PRESENTER 6,369.72 AP - 00273914 10/8/2008 GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 960.00 AP - 00273920 10/8/2008 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,700.00 AP - 00273939 10/8/2008 ICSC 600.00 AP - 00273946 10/8/2008 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CEN" 50.00 AP - 00273946 10/8/2008 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CEN' 50.00 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 787,866.92 AP - 00273959 10/8/2008 LANDS END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 99.15 AP - 00273981 10/8/2008 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 725.00 AP - 00273981 10/8/2008 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 170.00 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 99.88 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 24.57 AP - 00274013 10/8/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 4,899.85 AP - 00274013 10/8/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 7,894.85 AP - 00274014 10/8/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 92,844.47 AP - 00274014 10/8/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -9,284.45 AP - 00274016 10/8/2008 PROQUEST LLC 1,750.00 AP - 00274026 10/8/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 140.92 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 648.89 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 513.00 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 14,984.00 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 700.00 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 40.00 AP - 00274032 10/8/2008 RRM DESIGN GROUP 5,794.00 AP - 00274036 10/8/2008 SAFCO CAPITAL CORP 29,265.87 AP - 00274038 10/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 50.00 AP - 00274064 10/8/2008 SUNSET PUBLISHING 1,521.17 AP - 002741 l3 10/15/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 376.05 AP - 00274127 10/15/2008 ALTEK MEDIA GROUP, THE 1,200.00 AP - 00274135 10/15/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,426.90 AP - 00274140 10/15/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 221.47 AP - 00274189 10/15/2008 CORENET GLOBAL 4,335.00 AP - 00274190 10/15/2008 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,792.91 AP - 00274191 10/15/2008 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 87,038.25 AP-00274211 10/15/2008 DEMCOINC 1,466.76 AP - 00274215 10/15/2008 DISPLAYS2G0 761.38 AP - 00274215 10/] 5/2008 DISPLAYS2G0 142.98 AP - 00274219 10/15/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 81.20 AP - 00274229 10/15/2008 ESQUIVIAS, VIRGINIA 51.68 AP - 00274242 10/15/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 113.14 AP - 00274244 10/15/2008 FRAME ART 120.95 AP - 00274247 10/15/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 919.73 AP - 00274256 10/15/2008 GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 600.00 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:17:0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check t2et?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER AP - 00274284 10/15/2008 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE AP - 00274299 10/15/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS AP - 00274337 10/15/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC AP - 00274347 10/15/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC AP - 00274347 ] 0/15/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC AP - 00274347 10/15/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC AP - 00274353 10/15/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. AP - 00274353 10/15/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. AP - 00274353 10/15/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. AP - 00274353 10/15/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. AP - 00274353 10/15/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274368 10/15/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC AP - 00274368 10/15/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CFIAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00274401 10/15/2008 RRM DESIGN GROUP AP - 00274421 10/15/2008 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00274455 10/15/2008 TUTOR.COM INC AP - 00274472 10/15/2008 VEND U COMPANY AP - 00274499 10/15/2008 YAMADA ENTERPRISES AP - 00274499 10/15/2008 YAMADA ENTERPRISES AP - 00274499 10/18/2008 YAMADA ENTERPRISES AP - 00274499 ]0/15/2008 YAMADA ENTERPRISES AP - 00274499 ]0/t 5/2008 YAMADA ENTERPRISES AP - 00274506 10/22/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00274526 10/22/2008 BEACON PLUMBING AP - 00274553 10/22/2008 DEMMERS, LINDA AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00274571 10/22/2008 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC AP - 00274576 10/22/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY AP - 00274577 10/22/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS AP - 00274578 10/22/2008 G I S PLANNING INC AP - 00274580 10/22/2008 GRC ASSOCIATES INC AP - 00274581 10/22/2008 HERK EDWARDS INC AP - 00274581 10/22/2008 HERK EDWARDS INC AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS AP - 00274610 ]0/22/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD AP - 00274610 10/22/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD AP - 00274633 10/22/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P2 Amount 166.70 40.51 2,195.00 391,247.79 2,420.55 3,219.71 4,636.43 22,352.65 896.65 24,282.00 53,312.50 1,505.00 99,332.43 56.75 202.96 -99.88 299.24 3,384.17 22.58 3,300.00 1,300.00 6,633.33 6,633.33 -5,333.36 1Q,471.10 881.00 14,085.00 19.80 157,182.58 36,509.05 5,387.50 1,324.10 1,580.69 742.32 525.19 400.00 293.02 -10.13 22.04 19.46 3,089.15 116.37 12,921.13 20,400.00 770.00 44,170.00 -4,417.00 31.00 7,900.00 1,500.00 1,885.00 21.32 97.32 121.17 Curren[ Date: 10/29/200 Time: 16:17:0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P3 Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 79.11 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 276.21 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,021.83 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO -231.53 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,096.52 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 98.63 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 204.88 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 70.06 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 206.88 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.32 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.52 AP - 00274720 10/22/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 94.39 Total for Check ID AP: 2,593,400.00 Total for Entity: 2,593,400.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Curren[ Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:17:0 P4 STAFF REPORT ~ 1=~c,i~~r:rasi~~c, Siut~'iri~a llia~.~a'r~n-:N'r i~ RANCHO Date: November 5, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer~'"~ Subject: APPROVAL FOR AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE INCREASE TO CONTRACT CO# 02-065 IN THE AMOUNT OF $198,070.00 TO URS CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,807.00 FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS CAPITAL PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM 2001 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TAX ALLOCATION BOND FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 2650801- 5650/1355650-6314 AND APPROPRIATE $217,877.00 (CONTRACT AWARD OF $198,070.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,807.00) TO ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1355650-6314 FROM 2001 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TAX ALLOCATION BOND FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the award and authorize the increase to contract CO# 02-065 in the amount of $198,070.00 to URS Corporation, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,807.00 for construction support services for the Haven Avenue Underpass Capital Project, to be funded from 2001 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 2650801-5650/1355650-6314 and appropriate $217,877.00 (Contract award of $198,070.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $19,807.00) to Account No. 2650801-5650/1355650-6314 from 2001 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This contract is for the Haven Avenue Underpass improvement project and provide construction support services which include technical support contractors requests for information, conduct shop drawing reviews, attend builts and related construction support services. Respectfully submitted, uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer for URS Corporation to for responses to the meetings, prepare as- Attachment ~., P5 LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION VICINITY MAP 4 STAFF REPORT REDE V ELOPnf F_NT AGENCF Date: November 5, 2008 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director By: Donna Vega, Redevelopment Analyst I ~`, ~ J I~.,- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HUNT DESIGN TO PROVIDE WAYFINDING DESIGN AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,100.00 WITH A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,610.00, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 2620801-5110. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve the attached Professional Services Agreement for Hunt Design to provide design and consulting services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Wayfinding Sign Program. The Agency's approved budget for FY 2008/09 includes funding for this contract. BACKGROUND: The City Council identified as part of their 2008 City Council Goals the implementation of a Wayfinding Sign Program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. With regards to this objective, a cross-departmental taskforce was created to develop directional sign program criteria for the City's civic, historic and tourist-oriented destinations that are frequently accessed by both residents and visitors. The Wayfinding Taskforce consists of nine staff members from various City departments, including the Redevelopment Agency, the Community Services Department, the Engineering Department, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department, the Fire District, the Library, and Geographic Information Services. The Taskforce has been working together since January 2008 to identify facilities for inclusion in the program and possible sign locations. ANALYSIS: In July 2008, the Redevelopment Agency staff prepared and mailed a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to seven qualified wayfinding design and consulting firms. In addition to the direct mailing, the RFQ was also posted on the City's website. The Agency received six' proposals in response to this RFQ, and three firms were invited to participate in interviews and presentations. A Selection Committee, comprised of four members from the Wayfinding Taskforce, evaluated the firms based on their qualifications, experience, and quality of design work. Following the interviews, all three firms were asked to submit a cost proposal for the tasks of designing a sign template and assisting with the implementation of the Wayfinding Sign Program. Based on the cost and criteria mentioned above, the Selection Committee was unanimous in their recommendation of Hunt Design as the firm that would best be suited to carry out the City's Wayfinding Sign Program. Hunt Design has over twenty-five years of experience in the design of signage projects for both civic and recreation clients, including over twenty city directional sign and gateway projects. Previous clients include the cities of Newport Beach, Redondo Beach, Oxnard, Pasadena, and San Juan Capistrano, to name a few. Hunt Design is highly skilled in the planning and design of P6 P7 .APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT \VITH HUNT DESIGN TO PKOVIDE WAYFINDING DESIGN AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AMOtiNT OF $36,100.00 WITH A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,610.OQ, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 2620801-5110. NOA'ISMBHR 5, 2008 environmental graphic programs and the process of building consensus from both residents and public stakeholders on project elements. Their recommended process of building consensus is to hold workshops with project stakeholders, City Commissions, City Council, and members of the public to get community feedback during the design process. This will assist them in developing a design template that is reflective of the City's cultural identity and consistent with the City's graphic standards. This is a process that we plan to utilize during the development of our project to ensure that the City implements a successful program that is accepted by the community. Hunt Designs cost proposal of $36,100 is based on fees for four identified project tasks: site survey & data gathering; signage design; creation of plans and specifications; and supervision over the implementation process. These fees also include Hunt Design's expenses and staff time to prepare for and attend up to ten meetings, including City Council. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT p$ Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273802 10/8/2008 25 DOLLAR PLUMBING HEATING & AIR CONDI' ] 00.00 AP - 00273803 10/8/2008 A & A APPLIANCE SERVICE 172.41 AP - 00273803 10/8/2008 A & A APPLIANCE SERVICE 55.00 AP - 00273810 ]0/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 175.63 AP - 00273810 ]0/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 84.05 AP - 00273810 10/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 669.67 AP - 00273810 10/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 252.06 AP - 00273821 10/8/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,458.00 AP - 00273835 10/8/2008 BALL, ROBERT 119.94 AP - 00273839 10/8/2008 BELL, MIKE 1,640.00 AP - 00273844 10/8/2008 BROCK, ROBIN 135.40 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 492.09 AP - 00273894 10/8/2008 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 175.00 AP - 00273907 10/8/2008 GANDOLFO'S NY DELI 180.81 AP - 00273907 10/8/2008 GANDOLFO'S NY DELI 44.81 AP - 00273923 10/8/2008 HAM RADIO OUTLET 1,562.21 AP - 00273941 10/8/2008 INFECTION CONTROL EMERGENCY CONCEPTS 60.00 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 11.93 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 656.97 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 447.69 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 88.16 AP - 00273957 10/8/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 2,388.32 AP - 00273964 10/8/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 215.50 AP - 00273964 10/8/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 102.30 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 47.32 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 73.17 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.20 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 47.33 AP - 00273970 10/8/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 12.54 AP - 00273970 10/8/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 20.62 AP - 00273979 10/8/2008 MEDINA, BREANNA 500.00 AP - 00273995 10/8/2008 NORTH COAST EMS AGENCY 110.00 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 362.08 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.26 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 188.56 AP - 00274002 10/8/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 9,396.00 AP - 00274002 10/8/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 7,516.80 AP - 00274002 10/8/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 1,879:20 AP - 00274009 10/8/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 211.31 AP - 00274017 10/8/2008 QUALA TEL ENTERPRISES - 281.43 AP - 00274021 ~ 10/8/2008 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 24.50 AP - 00274041 10/8/2008 SC FUELS 2,321.99 AP - 00274041 10/8/2008 SC FUELS 1,160.99 AP - 00274041 10/8/2008 SC FUELS 3,322.14 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 146.16 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 5].02 AP - 00274047 ] 0/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 51.02 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 20.24 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 30.81 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 51.02 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 51.02 AP - 00274047 10/8/2008 SMART AND FINAL 51.03 AP - 00274051 10/8/2008 SOUTH COAST AQMD 109.00 AP - 00274051 10/8/2008 SOUTH COAS"t AQMD 109.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopcz Page: I Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274051 10/8/2008 SOUTH COAST AQMD 86.69 AP - 00274051 10/8/2008 SOUTH COAST AQMD 86.69 AP - 00274061 10/8/2008 STROUD SAFETY APPAREL LLC ]20.00 AP-00274065 ]0/8/2008 SWIFTYSIGN 105.60 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.72 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 56.25 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP-00274080 ]0/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 43.10 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP - 00274104 10/8/2008 XEROX CORPORATION 159.00 AP - 002741 ]4 10/! 5/2008 ABLETRONICS 49.19 AP - 00274121 10/15/2008 AIRGAS WEST 390.32 AP - 00274123 ] 0/15/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 646.50 AP - 00274123 10/15/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 78.66 AP - 00274123 10/15/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 242.98 AP - 00274124 10/15/2008 ALL WELDING 170.00 AP - 00274132 10/15/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,093.50 AP - 00274138 10/15/2008 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 3,518.45 AP - 00274147 ] 0/15/2008 BARB DOOR INC. 268.70 AP - 00274153 10/15/2008 BICONDOVA, JOHN 160.00 AP - 00274162 10/15/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 370.42 AP - 00274162 10/15/2008 CADET LNIFORM SERVICE 333.07 AP - 00274162 ] 0/] 5/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 190.73 AP - 00274162 10/15/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 388.30 AP - 00274162 10/15/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 230.55 AP - 00274162 10/] 5/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 269.89 AP - 00274163 10/15/2008 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 287.59 AP - 00274165 10/15/2008 CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF ARSON INVEST] 65.00 AP - 00274172 10/15/2008 CARNES, SANDY 36.31 AP - 00274179 10/15/2008 CFCA OPERATIONS CHIEFS SECTION 75.00 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.17 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.00 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 863.66 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,294.45 AP - 00274201 10/15/2008 DAGUE, JAMES 168.28 AP - 00274234 10/15/2008 FAIL SAFE TESTING 1,340.45 AP - 00274238 10/15/2008 FIREMASTER 178.47 AP - 00274238 10/15/2008 FIREMASTER 178.47 AP - 00274238 10/15/2008 FIREMASTER 2,679.99 AP - 00274251 10/15/2008 GAILINAS, PEGGY 250.00 AP - 00274252 10/15/2008 GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN. 633.18 AP - 00274274 10/15/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 4.84 AP - 00274274 10/15/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 1.93 AP - 00274274 10/15/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 31.99 AP - 00274274 10/15/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 7.26 AP - 00274274 10/15/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 31.46 AP - 00274274 10/] 5/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 60.28 AP - 00274278 ] 0/15/2008 IAFC MEMBERSHIP 235.00 P9 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Ret=ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274280 10/18/2008 ICC ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER 80.00 AP - 00274280 10/18/2008 ICC ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER 80.00 AP - 00274280 10/1S/2008 ICC ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER 80.00 AP - 00274305 10/18/2008 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 767.29 . AP - 00274320 10/18/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,858.24 AP - 00274320 10/18/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,855.24 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP - 00274320 10/18/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP - 00274345 10/1S/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 131.24 AP - 00274345 10/15/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 690.46 AP - 00274346 10/1S/2008 NATIONAL EMERGENCY NUMBER ASSOCIATI( 120.00 AP - 00274352 10/15/2008 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER 300.00 AP - 00274372 ]0/1S/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 242.65 AP - 00274376 10/15/2008 PHYSIO CONTROL INC 1,004.87 AP - 00274382 10/18/2008 PROULX, PATRICK 39.22 AP - 00274405 10/18/2008 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 170.00 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,322.18 AP - 00274428 ]0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 418.93 AP - 00274449 10/18/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 42.00 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 101.70 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 101.70 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 20.23 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP - 00274494 ]0/18/2008 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 7,375.86 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 47.88 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 67.35 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 84.1 S AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 77.47 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 40.95 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008. AIRGAS WEST 73.95 AP - 0027451 S 10/22/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 46.33 AP - 00274522 10/22/2008 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 665.90 AP - 00274522 10/22/2008 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 827.78 AP - 00274537 10/22/2008 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 398.58 AP - 00274548 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,373.34 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.58 AP - 00274548 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 298.21 AP - 00274546 10/22/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 478.26 AP - 00274584 10/22/2008 DEXSIL 301.00 AP - 00274584 10/22/2008 DEXSIL 9.88 AP - 00274888 10/22/2008 DIRECT SOURCE PRODUCTS 51.00 AP - 00274885 10/22/2008 DIRECT SOURCE PRODUCTS 9.00 AP - 00274857 10/22/2008 DORSEY COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, JIM 52.80 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 780.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 2;270.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 1,490.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 2;280.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 1,540.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 2,400.00 AP - 00274562 10/22/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 560.00 AP - 00274563 10/22/2008 EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS 210.00 AP - 00274573 10/22/2008 FIRL- EXPLORER POST 840 591.80 AP - 00274574 10/22/2008 FLEET SERVICES INC. 14.14 AP - 00274574 10/22/2008 FLEET SERVICES INC. 291.41 P10 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Pl l Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274585 10/22/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24.60 AP - 00274596 10/22/2008 INSIGHT 167.44 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.20 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.20 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.20 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.20 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.19 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 32.18 AP - 00274604 10/22/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 75.38 AP - 00274604 10/22/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 85.68 AP - 00274604 10/22/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 1,847.03 AP - 00274604 10/22/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 360.15 AP - 00274604 10/22/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 96.44 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 92.00 AP - 00274608 10/22/2008 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 256.80 AP - 00274608 10/22/2008 .LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 38.98 AP - 002746 ] 2 10/22/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 135.00 AP - 00274612 10/22/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 5,923.75 AP - 00274612 10/22/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,712.00 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 12.29 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 484.88 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 287.70 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 349.11 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 1,320.24 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 2,587.62 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 222.82 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 104.74 AP - 00274613 10/22/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 222.50 AP - 00274620 10/22/2008 MCKESSON MEDICAL SURGICAL 1 ] 1.21 AP - 00274620 10/22/2008 MCKESSON MEDICAL SURGICAL 162.05 AP - 00274622 ]0/22/2008 MEJ1A'S FURNITURE REPAIR 65.00 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 59.79 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,528.10 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 166.78 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 51.27 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.68 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.86 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.68 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.86 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.04 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 41.83 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.32 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 123.18 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 1,900.00 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 426.53 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 8,800.00 AP - 00274658 10/22/2008 RASMUSSEN, STEPHANIE 40.00 AP - 00274658 10/22/2008 RASMUSSEN, STEPHANIE 17.00 AP - 00274676 10/22/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 141.28 AP - 00274676 10/22/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 82.44 AP - 00274676 10/22/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 66.34 AP - 00274676 10/22/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 230.48 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,562.83 AP - 00274688 10/22/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P12 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28Y2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274688 10/22/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP - 00274688 10/22/2008 TERMTNIX PROCESSING CENTER 77.00 AP - 00274694 10/22/2008 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 8.99 AP - 00274697 10/22/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.72 AP - 00274697 10/22/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.72 AP - 00274707 10/22/2008 VERIZON BUSINESS 8.00 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 34.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 40.13 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 157.71 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 172.99 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 622.22 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 539.27 AP - 00274727 10/23/2008 LEE, LEOTA 307.60 AP - 00274728 10/23/2008 MORGAN, BYRON 528.52 Total for Check ID AP: 137,329.74 EP - 00000052 10/23/2008 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,328.42 EP - 00000053 10/23/2008 ALMAND, LLOYD 712.20 EP - 00000054 10/23/2008 ARTHUR, VERA 176.36 EP - 00000055 10/23/2008 BANTAU, VICTORIA 355.47 EP - 00000056 10/23/2008 BAZAL, SUSAN 1,085.41 EP - 00000057 10/23/2008 BILLINGS, ESTER 244.44 EP - 00000058 10/23/2008 CARNES, KENNETH 621.60 EP - 00000059 10/23/2008 CORCORAN, ROBERT 1,298.74 EP - 00000060 10/23/2008 COX, GEORGE 449.72 EP - 00000061 10/23/2008 COX, KARL 1,005.47 EP - 00000062 10/23/2008 CRANE, RALPH 1,536.30 EP - 00000063 10/23/2008 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 449.72 EP - 00000064 10/23/2008 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 1,717.46 EP - 00000065 10/23/2008 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 621.60 EP - 00000066 10/23/2008 HEYDE, DONALD 1,298.74 EP - 00000067 10/23/2008 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 682.74 EP - 00000068 10/23/2008 KILMER, STEPHEN 3,434.92 EP - 00000069 10/23/2008 LANE, WILLIAM 1,717.46 EP - 00000070 10/23/2008 LEE, ALLAN 1,067.72 EP - 00000071 10/23/2008 LONGO, JOE 176.36 EP - 00000072 10/23/2008 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 621.60 EP - 00000073 10/23/2008 MACKALL, BENJAMIN 176.36 EP - 00000074 10/23/2008 MAYFIELD, RON 2,026.29 EP - 00000075 10/23/2008 MCKEE, JOHN 2,026.29 EP - 00000076 10/23/2008 MCMILLEN, LINDA 414.04 EP - 00000077 10/23/2008 MCNEIL, KENNETH 1,298.74 EP - 00000078 10/23/2008 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 1,298.74 EE - 00000079 10/23/2008 MYSKOW. DENNIS 621.60 EP - 00000080 ] 0/23/2008 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 621.60 EP - 00000081 10/23/2008 NEE, RON 2,026.29 EP - 00000082 10/23/2008 NELSON, MARY JANE 262.30 EP - 00000083 10/23/2008 POST, MICHAEL R 1,269.22 EP - 00000084 10/23/2008 SALISBURY, THOMAS 1,536.30 EP - 00000086 10/23/2008 SMITH, RONALD 621.60 EP - 00000087 10/23/2008 SPAGNOLO, SAM 535.66 EP - 00000088 10/23/2008 SPAIN, WILLIAM 621.60 EP - 00000089 10/23/2008 SULLIVAN, JAMES 690.26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA[T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P13 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount EP - 00000090 10/23/2008 TAYLOR, STEVE 922.23 EP - 00000091 10/23/2008 TULEY, TERRY 1;298.74 EP - 00000092 10/23/2008 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 1,298.74 EP - 00000093 10/23/2008 WALKER, KENNETH 307.60 EP - 00000094 10/23/2008 WOLFE, DUANE 1,536.30 EP - 00000095 10/23/2008 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 1,717.46 Total for Check ID EP: 43,730.41 Total for Entity: 181,060.15 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:17:5 P14 t= ~_~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A FIRE PROTECTION D I S T R I C T Staff Report DATE Noverr~er5,2008 TQ President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief Janet Walker, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPTA DONATION OF FOUR (4) USED SCBAAIIR PACKS TO BE USED FOR TRAINING PURPOSES FROM RELL4tff POWER PLANT RECOMMENDATION Approval to accept a donation of four (4) used SCBA air packs valued at approximately $800 from Reliant Power Plant to be used for. training purposes BACKGROUND Mr. Kevin Schupp, Manager at Reliant Power Plant contacted the District wanting to donate four used Scott air packs. He indicated that the air packs are in working order and they simply~no longer had use for them at their facility. Each air pack contains a low pressure mask and one 30-minute steel cylinder. The District has determined the air packs are in acceptable condition and are an appropriate use for training purposes within the District FISCAL IMPACT None. Contact was made with our current SBCA representative who indicated the value of the used air packs to be approximately $200 each, for a total of $800. Upon Board approval, the District will issue a letter to Reliant Power Plant accepting the donation. Res ctfully submitted, Peter . Br n Fire Chief CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273804 10/8/2008 A&V SOFTBALL 3,588.00 AP - 00273805 10/8/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 76.18 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 253.49 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 39.63 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 10.78 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 30.17 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 18.80 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 67.88 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 10.24 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 40.41 AP - 00273806 10/8/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 192.55 AP - 00273807 10/8/2008 ADVANCED AUTO TECH 693.95 AP - 00273808 10/8/2008 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE INC. 30.35 AP - 00273809 10/8/2008 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 329,937.1 I AP - 00273809 10/8/2008 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 275,000.00 AP - 00273809 10/8/2008 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 295,000.00 AP - 00273809 10/8/2008 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT -60,493.71 AP - 00273809 10/8/2008 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT -29,500.00 AP - 00273810 10/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 3,948.47 AP - 00273810 10/8/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 50.50 AP - 00273811 10/8/2008 ALL WELDING ~ 1,632.41 AP - 00273811 10/8/2008 ALL WELDING 100.00 AP - 00273811 10/8/2008 ALL WELDING 272.40 AP - 00273812 10/8/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 624.14 AP - 00273813 10/8/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 187.00 AP - 00273813 10/8/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 98.05 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 002738]4 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 325.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 755.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 460.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 500.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 370.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 510.00 AP - 00273814 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 575.00 AP - 00273815 10/8/2008 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 5,550.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273816 10/8/2008 ALVAREZ, ETELVINA 78.00 AP - 00273817 10/8/2008 AMERICAN BODY ARMOR & EQUIPMENT INC. 107.75 AP - 00273818 10/8/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 241.44 AP - 00273818 10/8/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 207.68 AP - 00273818 10/8/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 233.71 AP - 00273819 10/8/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A< 187.87 AP - 00273820 10/8/2008 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 162,667.61 AP - 00273822 10/8/2008 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES I 90.]6 AP - 00273823 10/8/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00273824 10/8/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 500.00 AP - 00273824 10/8/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 119.56 AP - 00273826 10/8/2008 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 445.20 AP - 00273826 10/8/2008 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 149.72 AP - 00273827 10/8/2008 ASSE 160.00 AP - 00273828 10/8/2008 ASSI SECURITY 360.00 AP - 00273828 10/8/2008 ASSI SECURITY 685.00 AP - 00273829 10/8/2008 ASSOCIATED GROUP 2,213.59 AP - 00273830 10/8/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 21,159.75 AP - 00273830 10/8/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 13,427.50 AP - 00273830 10/8/2008 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 2,467.50 AP - 00273831 10/8/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS 104.99 AP - 00273832 10/8/2008 AVIAN ENTERTAINMENT 400.00 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 351.10 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,344.29 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 15.19 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 117.51 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 509.30 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 719.89 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 144.39 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 213.35 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 216.50 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 542.98 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 844.98 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 21.55 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 225.20 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 227.27 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 42.87 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 338.31 AP - 00273833 ]0/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 2,613.75 AP - 00273833 10/8/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,243.79 AP - 00273834 10/8/2008 BALDEON, CARLOS 133.00 AP - 00273834 ] 0/8/2008 BALDEON, CARLOS 120.00 AP - 00273836 10/8/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,295.68 AP - 00273837 10/8/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 1,066.69 AP - 00273838 10/8/2008 BART\`ES AND NOBLE 1,402.84 AP - 00273840 10/8/2008 BERA'ARD. JEREMY 438.75 AP - 00273840 10/8/2008 BERNARD, JEREMY 282.63 AP - 00273840 10/8/2008 BERNARD, JEREMY 228.00 AP - 00273840 10/8/2008 BERNARD, JEREMY 112.50 AP - 00273842 10/8/2008 BISHOP COMPANY ]05.50 AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 200.00 AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 200.00 AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 200.00 AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 200.00 P16 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No: Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ W ORK GROUP INC 200.00 AP - 00273843 10/8/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 200.00 AP - 00273845 10/8/2008 BRUCE, INGRID 169.70 AP - 00273846 10/8/2008 BUCKNAM AND ASSOCIATES 412.50 AP - 00273847 10/8/2008 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 87.31 AP - 00273848 10/8/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 514.92 AP - 00273849 10/8/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE BOARD 552.00 AP - 00273850 10/8/2008 CALSENSE 256.80 AP - 00273850 10/8/2008 CALSENSE 1,550.85 AP - 00273851 10/8/2008 CALZADA, KIMBERLY 100.00 AP - 00273852 10/8/2008 CARSON, AMY 79.46 AP - 00273853 10/8/2008 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 3,059.40 AP - 00273854 10/8/2008 CITY RENTALS 285.00 AP - 00273854 10/8/2008 CITY RENTALS 380.80 AP - 00273855 10/8/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00273856 10/8/2008 CLAIREMONT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,380.00 AP - 00273857 10/8/2008 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 179.82 AP - 00273857 10/8/2008 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 498.96 AP - 00273857 10/8/2008 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 1,287.36 AP - 00273858 10/8/2008 COMMUNITY BANK 60,493.71 AP - 00273858 10/8/2008 COMMUNITY BANK 29,500.00 AP - 00273859 10/8/2008 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 454.00 AP - 00273860 10/8/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 714.38 AP - 00273860 10/8/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 732.70 AP - 00273861 ] 0/8/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00273862 10/8/2008 COOPER, MISTY 225.00 AP - 00273863 10/8/2008 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 995.34 AP - 00273863 10/8/2008 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 862.00 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 33.34 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 26.67 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 400.05 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00273864 10/8/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 7t 1.20 AP - 00273865 10/8/2008 COVERT SYSTEMS LLC 1,631.25 AP - 00273865 10/8/2008 COVERT SYSTEMS LLC 1,482.79 AP - 00273866 10/8/2008 CRUZ, SANDRA 21.00 AP - 00273867 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA ESTATES 52 LLC 500.00 AP - 00273867 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA ESTATES 52 LLC 522.00 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 333.50 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.95 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 296.10 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 616.17 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,182.68 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,332.14 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.14 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 514.65 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 860.10 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 393.39 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 329.94 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 576.69 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 218.55 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 524.52 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.49 P17 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 506.19 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67.01 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 284.82 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.15 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.04 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,606.13 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 645.78 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.37 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,387.86 AP - 00273868 10/8/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 951.75 AP - 00273869 10/8/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 366.35 AP - 00273869 10/8/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 858.77 AP - 00273870 10/8/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 20,820.00 AP - 00273871 10/8/2008 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 4,270.00 AP - 00273872 10/8/2008 DELOS SANTOS, CECILE 250.00 AP - 00273873 10/8/2008 DELTA DENTAL 40,077.94 AP - 00273874 10/8/2008 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 194.82 AP - 00273874 10/8/2008 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 213.35 AP - 00273874 10/8/2008 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 109.91 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 135.00 AP - 00273875 10/8/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 150.00 AP - 00273876 10/8/2008 DODSON & ASSOCIATES, TOM 4,745.00 AP - 00273877 10/8/2008 DYNALECTRIC 10,666.89 AP - 00273877 10/8/2008 DYNALECTRIC -1,066.69 AP - 00273878 10/8/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1,225.36 AP - 00273878 10/8/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC -87.18 AP - 00273879 10/8/2008 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 5,941.50 AP - 00273880 10/8/2008 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 1,849.68 AP - 00273881 10/8/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 45.00 AP - 00273881 10/8/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 291.55 AP - 00273882 10/8/2008 ESRI 215.50 AP - 00273883 10/8/2008 ESTATE SERVICE, THE 250.00 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 243.97 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 146.02 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 974.06 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 142.85 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 642.57 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 157.10 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 41837 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 105.06 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 44.52 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 121.52 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 418.98 AP - 00273884 10/8/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 29.91 AP - 00273885 10/8/2008 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 19.40 AP - 00273886 10/8/2008 FARLEY, ANN CLOSS- 500.00 AP - 00273886 10/8/2008 FARLEY, ANN CLOSS- 383.59 AP - 00273886 10/8/2008 FARLEY, ANN CLOSS- 834.00 AP - 00273887 10/8/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 7.85 P18 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CU.CAMONGA p~ g Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00273888 10/8/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 66.38 AP - 00273888 10/8/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.00 AP - 00273888 10/8/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 37.46 AP - 00273888 10/8/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 47.49 AP - 00273889 10/8/2008 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 200.00 AP - 00273890 10/8/2008 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 503.19 AP - 00273890 10/8/2008 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 375.88 AP - 00273890 10/8/2008 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 697.40 AP - 00273891 10/8/2008 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 336.11 AP - 00273892 10/8/2008 FILARSKY AND WATT 1,687.50 AP - 00273893 10/8/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 441.75 AP - 00273895 ]0/8/2008 FLEET SERVICES INC. 232.16 AP - 00273896 10/8/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 100.00 AP - 00273897 10/8/2008 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 4,257.74 AP - 00273898 10/8/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 215.51 AP - 00273898 10/8/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 1,842.36 AP - 00273898 10/8/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 24.69 AP - 00273899 10/8/2008 FUKUSHIMA, NDITH 2,887.50 AP - 00273900 10/8/2008 FUTSCHER ENTERPRISES 25.50 AP - 00273901 10/8/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3,766.22 AP - 00273901 10/8/2008 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 2,600.18 AP - 00273904 10/8/2008 GALE, BRIAN 759.00 AP - 00273905 10/8/2008 GAMBOA, MINERVA 310.00 AP - 00273908 10/8/2008 GARCIA, LUPE 500.00 AP - 00273908 10/8/2008 GARCIA, LUPE 500.00 AP - 00273909 ]0/8/2008 GARCIA, TERESA 250.00 AP - 00273910 10/8/2008 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING IT 210.00 AP - 00273912 10/8/2008 GLOBAL PRESENTER 380.00 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 271.08 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 396.63 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 111.14 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 9.43 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 10.95 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 221.78 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 62.45 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 58.55 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 234.21 AP - 00273915 . 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 1,783.37 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 262.80 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 969.33 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 969.33 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 658.07 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 477.47 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 30.00 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 7.13 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 17.61 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 2.93 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 198.41 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 398.68 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 535.74 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 34.23 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 7.99 AP - 00273915 10/8/2008 GRAINGER 1,824.51 AP - 00273916 10/8/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 321,609.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273916 10/8/2008 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC -32,160.90 AP - 00273917 10/8/2008 GRANICUS INC 1,100.00 AP - 00273918 10/8/2008 GRAY, JAMAAL 45.00 AP - 00273919 10/8/2008 GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES 87.52 AP - 00273921 10/8/2008 GUARDIAN 3,515.11 AP - 00273922 10/8/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,987.17 AP - 00273922 10/8/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,883.63 AP - 00273924 10/8/2008 HAMILTON, DENISE 500.00 AP - 00273925 10/8/2008 HAMMER, ANDREW 834.00 AP - 00273926 10/8/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 239.50 AP - 00273927 10/8/2008 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 96.88 AP - 00273927 10/8/2008 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 281.85 AP - 00273928 10/8/2008 HEELER ARCHITECT, JOHN 3,545.00 AP - 00273929 10/8/2008 HERK EDWARDS INC 39.92 AP - 00273930 10/8/2008 HOGAN, JULIA 67.39 AP - 00273931 10/8/2008 HOLIAN, KATHERINE 60.00 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 621.18 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 100.00 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 606.64 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,102.56 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,641.30 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 811.63 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 610.67 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 123.37 AP - 00273932 10/8/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00273933 10/8/2008 HOLMES II, EMORY 250.00 AP - 00273934 10/8/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 109.01 AP - 00273934 10/8/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 288.87 AP - 00273935 10/8/2008 HOSE MAN INC 14.00 AP - 00273935 10/8/2008 HOSE MAN INC 20.93 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 96.96 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 34.75 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 6.81 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 310.96 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 229.71 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 111.50 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 276.09 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 69.49 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 168.82 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 506.90 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 225.94 AP - 00273936 10/8/2008 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 25.36 AP - 00273937 10/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 596.15 AP - 00273937 10/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 239.60 AP - 00273937 10/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 390.89 AP - 00273937 10/8/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 244.20 AP - 00273938 10/8/2008 ICMA 1,296.00 AP - 00273940 10/8/2008 IGNITE DESIGN AND ADVERTISING 1,375.00 AP - 00273942 10/8/2008 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIC 755.20 AP - 00273943 10/8/2008 INLAND EMPIRE, IES 496.00 AP - 00273944 10/8/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 5.00 AP - 00273945 10/8/2008 INSIGHT 242.25 P20 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16: ] 4:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2005 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273945 10/8/2008 INSIGHT 242.26 AP - 00273945 10/8/2008 INSIGHT 884.68 AP - 00273945 10/8/2008 INSIGHT 430.72 AP - 00273945 10/8/2008 INSIGHT 242.26 AP - 00273947 10/8/2008 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 575.58 AP - 00273948 10/8/2008 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 227.56 AP - 00273949 10/8/2008 JACKSON HIRSH INC 94.38 AP - 00273950 10/8/2008 JAMIL, ZOHRA 8.00 AP - 00273951 10/8/2008 JOHNSON LIFT HYSTER 1,990.38 AP - 00273952 10/8/2008 JOHNSON, VICTORIA 64.92 AP - 00273953 10/8/2008 K K WOODWORKING 38.79 AP - 00273953 10/8/2008 K K WOODWORKING 25.86 AP - 00273954 10/8/2008 KARATSU, ROBERT 45.00 AP - 00273955 10/8/2008 KELLY EQUIPMENT 1,588.38 AP - 00273956 10/8/2008 KINDERSTUTH, OLIVIER 158.00 AP - 00273958 10/8/2008 KUZMINSKI, CHERISE 69.62 AP - 00273958 10/8/2008 KUZMINSKI, CHERISE 20.00 AP - 00273960 10/8/2008 LEAL, RUTH 380.00 AP - 00273961 10/8/2008 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 3,621.50 AP - 00273962 10/8/2008 LEZA, MENA 132.94 AP - 00273963 10/8/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 15.00 AP - 00273963 10/8/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 612.90 AP - 00273963 10/8/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 515.94 AP - 00273963 10/8/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 1,263.86 AP - 00273965 10/8/2008 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 123.58 AP - 00273966 10/8/2008 LOS ANGELES OPERA 600.00 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 301.74 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 172.15 AP - 00273969 10/8/2005 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 27.60 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 78.87 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.11 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 43.49 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 58.02 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 171.42 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 43.00 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 229.70 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 235.22 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.65 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 49.96 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.69 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6.10 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.09 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 110.08 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 121.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 23.60 AP - 00273969 ]0/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -41.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 3.21 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 41.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 41.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 46.93 AP - 00273969 10!8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 97.90 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.41 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.70 AP - 00273969 ]0/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.35 P21 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.42 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.49 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 23.54 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 89.96 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 146.95 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 223.32 AP - 00273969 10/8!2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 245.84 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.05 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LO W ES COMPANIES INC. 25.61 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 48.97 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 75.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 111.21 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 316.79 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.22 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 55.06 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -10.75 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.41 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.75 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.43 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES'INC. 37.50 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 43.85 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.54 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 88.41 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 173.20 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 428.85 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 76.20 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 72.76 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 84,48 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.65 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.73 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.87 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.79 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 67.83 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 61.68 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 21.23 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.54 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 53.34 AP - 00273969 10/8!2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 646.52 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 124.18 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.26 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 40.30 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.92 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 72.62 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 75.90 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 199.12 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 128.03 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.59 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.98 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 27.81 AP - 00273969 ]0/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 94.32 AP - 00273969 ] 0/8/2008 LO W ES COMPANIES INC. 191.83 AP - 00273969 ] 0/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 83.79 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 19.74 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.58 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: ] 0/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2g Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 tluough 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.29 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 98.08 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 101.39 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.66 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 69.88 AP - 00273969 ] 0/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 75.37 AP - 00273969 10/8/2008 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 159.92 AP - 00273971 10/8/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 525.82 AP - 00273972 10/8/2008 MALAK, JOSEPHINE 500.00 AP - 00273972 10/8/2008 MALAK, JOSEPHINE 500.00 AP - 00273973 10/8/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00273973 10/8/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00273974 10/8/2008 MATERL4L HANDLING SUPPLY INC 713.51 AP - 00273975 10/8/2008 MATHIS CONSULTING GROUP 2,145.00 AP - 00273976 10/8/2008 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 67.88 AP - 00273977 10/8/2008 MCI 12,366.20 AP - 00273977 10/8/2008 MCI 14.15 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 77.32 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 66.92 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 383.42 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 193.60 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 257.84 AP - 00273978 10/8/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY -66.92 AP - 00273980 10/8/2008 MEDINA, SANDRA 240.00 AP - 00273981 10/8/2008 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 15,063.84 AP - 00273981 10/8/2008 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 475.00 AP - 00273982 10/8/2008 MINUTEMAN PRESS 278.91 AP - 00273983 10/8/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 377.29 AP - 00273984 10/8/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 304.05 AP - 00273984 10/8/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 191.49 AP - 00273985 10/8/2008 MURADIAN, LESLIE 500.00 AP - 00273986 10/8/2008 NAJERA, HECTOR 86.00 AP - 00273987 10/8/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.86 AP - 00273987 10/8/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.30 AP - 00273987 10/8/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 228.75 AP - 00273987 10/8/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 15.95 AP - 00273987 10/8/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 263.75 AP - 00273988 10/8/2008 NASH, JESSICA 1,061.88 AP - 00273989 10/8/2008 NATIVIDAD, ELIZABETH 60.00 AP - 00273990 10/8/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 472.89 AP - 00273990 10/8/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 21,594.30 AP - 00273991 10/8/2008 NELSON, JOANALEE 90.00 AP - 00273992 10/8/2008 NICOLS, JOSHA W 120.00 AP - 00273993 10/8/2008 NINYO & MOORE 1,159.00 AP - 00273994 10/8/2008 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOCIATES 7,180.71 AP - 00273996 10/8/2008 NOVELTY PRINTING 537.20 AP - 00273997 10/8/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 98.43 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.27 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 6.58 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 493.15 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.90 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.53 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.01 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P24 Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -10.26 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 10.26 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.73 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.02 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.01 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 122.16 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 35.87 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 293.36 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,096.94 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.00 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.32 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.26 AP - 00273999 ] 0/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -3.25 AP - 00273999 ] 0/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -16.32 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 281.60 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 45.70 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 66.48 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 122.87 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 22.53 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 86.22 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 50.34 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 46.89 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT - 3.06 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.19 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 61.65 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.01 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.74 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.73 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.50 AP - 00273999 10/8/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.50 AP - 00274000 10/8/2008 OLSEN CONSTRUCTION, H C 500.00 AP - 00274001 10/8/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 4.06 AP - 00274001 10/8/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 391.24 AP - 00274001 10/8/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 280.76 AP - 00274003 10/8/2008 ORACLE CORP 3,000.00 AP - 00274004 10/8/2008 PAIRMAN, DORIS 140.00 AP - 00274005 10/8/2008 PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 2,550.00 AP - 00274006 10/8/2008 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 165.85 AP - 00274007 10/8/2008 PARSAC 9,137.00 AP - 00274007 10/8/2008 PARSAC 93,654.00 AP - 00274007 10/8/2008 PARSAC 43,077.00 AP - 00274008 10/8/2008 PASCOE, JIM 250.00 AP - 00274009 10/8/2008 PATTON SALES CORD 4.48 AP - 00274010 10/8/2008 PENDLETON PARTNERS INC 21,344.32 AP - 0027401 I ] 0/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 909.73 AP - 00274011 10/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 110.78 AP - 00274011 10/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 54.00 AP - 002740] I 10/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC -128.86 AP - 00274011 10/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 292.84 AP - 0027401 I 10/8/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 338.33 AP - 00274012 10/8/2008 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 200.00 AP - 00274012 10/8/2008 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 200.00 AP - 00274012 10/8/2008 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 200.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274012 10/8/2008 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 200.00 AP - 00274014 10/8/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 102,468.50 AP - 00274014 10/8/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -]0,246.85 AP - 00274015 10/8/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80 AP - 00274018 10/8/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDA 9,100.40 AP - 00274019 10/8/2008 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 100.00 AP - 00274020 10/8/2008 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 30.00 AP - 00274020 10/8/2008 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 30.00 AP - 00274022 10/8/2008 RBF CONSULTING 16,420.03 AP - 00274023 10/8/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 46.17 AP - 00274023 10/8/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 96.98 AP - 00274024 10/8/2008 RCPFA 8,584.98 AP - 00274025 10/8/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 178.59 AP - 00274027 10/8/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 594.00 AP - 00274028 10/8/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC ]08,256.13 AP - 00274028 10/8/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 11.16 AP - 00274029 10/8/2008 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 278.82 AP - 00274029 10/8/2008 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 200.62 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 105.00 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 110.00 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 83.00 AP - 00274030 10/8/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 125.00 AP - 00274031 10/8/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 480.00 AP - 00274033 10/8/2008 RUCKER, MARK 1,334.00 AP - 00274034 10/8/2008 RUSLI, SILVIA 103.68 AP - 00274035 10/8/2008 S & S DOORS 161.63 AP - 00274037 10/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT ],004.00 AP - 00274039 10/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 168.00 AP - 00274040 10/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,030.48 AP - 00274040 10/8/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 4,315.00 AP - 00274041 10/8/2008 SC FUELS 11,245.71 AP - 00274041 10/8/2008 SC FUELS 15,529.78 AP - 00274042 10/8/2008 SCWMF 210.00 AP - 00274043 10/8/2008 SHEAKLEY 120.40 AP - 00274043 10/8/2008 SHEAKLEY 12.60 AP - 00274043 10/8/2008 SHEAKLEY 43.00 AP - 00274043 10/8/2008 SHEAKLEY 9.00 AP - 00274043 10/8/2008 SHEAKLEY 32.00 AP - 00274044 10/8/2008 SHORTS, ROBERT 500.00 AP - 00274045 10/8/2008 SIGN SHOP, THE 50.10 AP - 00274046 10/8/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 762.87 AP - 00274048 10/8/2008 SON, KWONG MI 250.00 AP - 00274049 10/8/2008 SOUKUP, STEPHANIE 15.80 AP - 00274050 10/8/2008 SOURCE GRAPHICS 67.33 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,041.02 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25,443.41 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.01 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.40 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.11 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aisenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 166.88 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.27 AP - 00274053 ]0/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,541.18 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.42 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.44 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.56 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.49 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.97 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.87 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 465.45 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.56 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.30 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.46 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.43 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.30 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.49 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.17 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.25 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 543.65 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.53 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.15 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.75 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.43 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.18 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.44 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.08 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.06 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.11 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.90 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.56 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 515.19 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.68 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.83 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 6.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.32 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.42 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.98 P26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA At=,enda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274053 10/8!2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.45 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.39 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.60 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.97 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.02 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274053 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50,047.84 AP - 00274054 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,855.80 AP - 00274055 10/8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,247.45 AP - 00274056 10/8/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 922.74 AP - 00274056 10/8/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 4,930.37 AP - 00274056 10/8/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 2,046.17 AP - 00274056 10/8/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC -2,046.17 AP - 00274057 10/8/2008 STITCHWEAR INC 406.23 AP - 00274058 10/8/2008 STOVER SEED COMPANY 263.99 AP - 00274059 ] 0/8/2008 STRAIGHT, SUSAN 250.00 AP - 00274060 10/8/2008 STRESS LESS EXPRESS LLC 150.12 AP - 00274062 10/8/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 2,960.00 AP - 00274063 10/8/2008 SUNNY EXPRESS INC 29.42 AP - 00274063 10/8/2008 SUNNY EXPRESS INC 29.42 AP - 00274066 ] 0/8/2008 TAN, LIN 106.24 AP - 00274067 10/8/2008 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 352.90 AP - 00274068 ] 0/8/2008 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES L 80.81 AP - 00274069 10/8/2008 TOOLS R US 187.09 AP - 00274070 10/8/2008 TROYER, JAMES 40.00 AP - 00274071 10/8/2008 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00274071 10/8/2008 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00274072 10/8/2008 UTI 1,343.16 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 50.34 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.77 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 983.97 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 190.68 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.77 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 50.34 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 950.42 AP - 00274073 10/8/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 165.37 AP - 00274074 10/8/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 51,268.39 AP - 00274075 10/8/2008 UNITED FENCE ERECTORS 4,850.00 AP - 00274076 10/8/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00 AP - 00274077 10/8/2008 UPS 55.31 AP - 00274077 10/8/2008 UPS 40.18 AP - 00274077 10/8/2008 UPS 129.84 AP - 00274078 10/8/2008 US POSTMASTER 500.00 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 2,421.71 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 202.62 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 32.87 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 575.35 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 200.38 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 459. ] 9 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 P27 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P28 Ai?enda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 21.52 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 43.20 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 281.38 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 33.96 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 20.23 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 39.59 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 32.87 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 32.87 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 364.50 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 1 ] 6.49 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 101.70 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 85.44 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 35.15 AP - 00274080 10/8/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274081 ] 0/8/2008 VERIZON 5,775.69 AP - 00274082 10/8/2008 VERIZON 3,913.63 AP - 00274083 10/8/2008 VERIZON 2,010.39 AP - 00274084 10/8/2008 VERIZON 2,961.61 AP - 00274085 10/8/2008 Verizon 39.66 AP - 00274086 10/8/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 240.24 AP - 00274086 10/8/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 198.46 AP - 00274087 10/8/2008 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 425.00 AP - 00274088 10/8/2008 VISTA PAINT 86.40 AP - 00274088 10/8/2008 VISTA PAINT 28.03 AP - 00274089 10/8/2008 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 1,232.14 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO -79.42 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 146.90 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 345.48 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 84.84 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 147.65 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 338.21 AP - 00274090 10/8/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 38.84 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 118.09 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 52.30 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 440.88 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 150.98 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 23.96 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 23.40 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 11.70 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 128.99 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 56.55 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -38.55 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 38.55 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 860.67 AP - 00274091 10/8/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 69.29 AP - 00274092 10/8/2008 WEST COAST ARBORISTS PVC 7,562.52 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pagc: 14 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274092 10/8/2008 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 18,933.99 AP - 00274093 10/8/2008 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 279.3 AP - 00274094 ]0/8/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 1,626.83 AP - 00274095 10/8/2008 WESTERN MILLING 810.24 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 5.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP-00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274096 10/8/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274097 10/8/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 866.81 AP - 00274098 10/8/2008 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 2,625.00 AP - 00274099 10/8/2008 WILLIAMS, VICTORIA 250.00 AP - 00274100 10/8/2008 WILSON AND BELL 445.69 AP - 00274100 10/8/2008 WILSON AND BELL 761.78 AP - 00274100 10/8/2008 WILSON AND BELL 222.62 AP - 00274101 10/8/2008 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 43.00 AP - 00274.102 10/8/2008 WOOD, HEATHER 500.00 AP - 00274103 10/8/2008 WU, JONATHAN T. 50.00 AP - 00274105 10/8/2008 XIAO, DENISE 65.00 AP - 00274106 10/8/2008 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 1,000.00 AP - 00274106 10/8/2008 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 500.00 AP - 00274107 10/8/2008 ZENO, MARIE 99.00 AP - 00274108 10/9/2008 PILOT POWER GROUP INC 22,808.15 AP - 00274109 10/9/2008 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 8,289.43 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 899.07 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.47 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 903.08 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 952.83 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 670.57 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,072.67 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.47 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 724.59 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.39 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.85 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.47 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.47 P29 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 52.00 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 381.76 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 140.66 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 942.65 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.85 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 48.84 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 102.54 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.71 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 90.80 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 45.42 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,291.15 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 99.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 89.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 26.26 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.95 AP - 00274110 10/15/2008 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 157.14 AP - 00274111 10/15/2008 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 1,404.00 AP - 00274112 10/15/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 996.69 AP - 00274113 10/15/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 6.47 AP - 00274113 10/15/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 119.82 AP - 00274113 10/15/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,237.24 AP - 00274113 10/15/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 171.81 AP - 00274115 10/] 5/2008 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 2,407.50 AP - 00274116 10/15/2008 ACME BALLOON CO. 350.00 AP - 00274117 10/15/2008 ADVANCED AUTO TECH 59.98 AP - 00274118 10/15/2008 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 3,661.75 AP - 00274119 10/15/2008 AGI ACADEMY 693.00 AP - 00274120 10/15/2008 AGI GENERAL CONTRACTING 5,000.00 AP - 00274122 10/15/2008 ALDRICH & ASSOCIATES INC. 625.00 AP - 00274125 10/15/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 1,120.67 AP - 00274126 10/15/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 775.00 AP - 00274126 10/15/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 620.00 AP - 00274126 10/15/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 570.00 AP - 00274126 10/15/2008 ALTA LONIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 405.00 AP - 00274126 10/15/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 555.00 AP - 00274128 10/15/2008 ALUZRI, MAHDI 42.25 AP - 00274129 10/15/2008 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 733.71 AP - 00274129 10/15/2008 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 478.04 AP - 00274130 10/15/2008 AMERICAN VISION FINANCIAL INC. 85.05 AP - 00274131 10/15/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 439.00 AP - 00274131 10/15/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 8.22 AP - 00274133 10/15/2008 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 6,872.25 AP - 00274134 10/15/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00274136 10/15/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS ] 07.62 AP - 00274137 ]0/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 206.95 AP - 00274137 10/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 21.99 AP - 00274137 10/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 10.18 AP - 00274137 10/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 354.20 AP - 00274137 10/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 156.26 AP - 00274137 10/15/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 113.39 AP - 00274139. 10/15/2008 BALDEON, CARLOS 212.50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AQettda Check Re>?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274140 10/15/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,874.85 AP - 00274140 10/15/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 393.54 AP - 00274141 10/15/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 85.97 AP - 00274142 10/15/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 12,214.36 AP - 00274142 10/15/2008 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 8,445.64 AP - 00274143 10/15/2008 BARKSHIRE LASER LEVELING INC. 2,200.00 AP - 00274144 10/15/2008 BARLOWS ALTERED ESTATES 28.00 AP - 00274145 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 49.51 AP - 00274145 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 691.70 AP - 00274145 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 477.83 AP - 00274]45 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 120.59 AP - 00274146 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 174.67 AP - 00274146 10/15/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,232.58 AP - 00274148 10/15/2008 BASELINE SURVEYING INC 725.00 AP - 00274149 10/] 5/2008 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 702.83 AP - 00274150 10/15/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 480.76 AP - 00274150 10/15/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 180.00 AP - 00274] 51 10/15/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 3,906.00 AP - 00274151 10/15/2008 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 2,808.00 AP - 00274152 10/15/2008 BERGERON, ROCHELLE 250.00 AP - 00274154 10/15/2008 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 198.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 146.79 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.69 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 166.30 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.68 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 655.77 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.63 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.88 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 7.75 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 72.24 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.11 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 60.06 AP - 002741 S7 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 618.12 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.95 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.06 AP - 002741 S7 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 438.27 AP - 00274157 10/] 5/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.40 AP - 00274157 10/15!2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.70 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 131.39 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 75.06 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.23 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.93 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.93 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 829.50 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.94 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.22 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.28 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 30.86 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.45 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.68 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 63.89 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42 P31 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2326 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.94 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 279.82 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 317.68 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.32 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 104.72 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 201.11 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.10 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 47.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.58 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.20 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.68 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 96.20 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 325.87 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 56.19 AP - 002741 S7 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 48.32 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.14 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.68 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 234.18 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.04 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.56 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.78 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.31 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.44 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 78.24 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.09 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.78 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 72.41 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 143.28 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.04 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 451.10 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.99 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 43.06 P32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register ] 0/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 97.34 AP - 00274157 10/t 5/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.04 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS .17.14 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 59.59 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 43.63 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 9.50 AP - 00274]57 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66 AP - 00274157 ] 0/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274157 ] 0/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 123.52 AP - 00274157 10/15/2008 BRODART BOOKS 123.50 AP - 00274158 10/15/2008 BROWN, CHERRY 19.50 AP - 00274159 10/15/2008 BROWN, JENNIFER 244.75 AP - 00274160 10/15/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 2,752.01 AP - 00274160 10/18/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 640.02 AP - 00274161 10/15/2008 C&C SIGNAL LLC.. 2,249.23 AP - 00274164 10/15/2008 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66.75 AP - 00274166 10/15/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE BOARD 2.72 AP - 00274167 10/15/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP - 00274168 10/15/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 AP - 00274169 ] 0/ 15/2008 CALSENSE 414.17 AP - 00274169 ] 0/15/2008 CALSENSE 1,804.90 AP - 00274169 10/15/2008 CALSENSE 1,848.71 AP - 00274169 10/15/2008 CALSENSE 604.72 AP - 00274169 10/15/2008 CALSENSE 1,630.85 AP - 00274170 ] 0/15/2008 CAPITOL STEPS PRODUCTIONS INC. 617.50 AP - 00274171 10/15/2008 CARDENAS, SERGIO 25.00 AP - 00274173 10/15/2008 CARR, CARLA 120.75 AP - 00274174 10/15/2008 CARRILLO, TRINA 445.80 AP - 00274175 10/15/2008 CARTY, DIANE 821.70 AP - 00274176 10/15/2008 CASTILLO, FRANK 162.00 AP - 00274177 10/15/2008 CASTILLO, JUAQUIN JACK 2,205.60 AP - 00274178 10/15/2008 CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX & ADVISORY OF ORA] 850.00 AP - 00274180 10/15/2008 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 109.99 AP - 00274181 10/15/2008 CHILTON, GABRIELLE 378.00 AP - 00274182 10/15/2008 CLAEYS, LYNNAE SUZANNE 2,066.59 AP - 00274183 10/15/2008 CLARK, KAREN 1,314.00 AP - 00274184 10/15/2008 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 68.92 AP - 00274184 10/15/2008 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 51.96 AP - 00274184 10/15/2008 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 89.34 AP - 00274184 ] 0/15/2008 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. -132.97 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 150.85 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 708.16 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 708.16 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 708.16 AP - 00274185 10/t 5/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 708.16 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 123.91 AP - 00274185 10/li/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 61.96 AP - 00274185 10/15/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 61.95 AP - 00274186 10/15/2008 COLLETTE, PETE 15.00 AP - 00274187 10/15/2008 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 3,271.20 AP - 00274188 10/15/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 192.55 AP - 00274192 10/15/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274192 10/15/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 26.67 P33 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Curren[ Date: 10/29/200 ReporbCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re!?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274192 ] 0/18/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274192 ]0/15/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274192 10/18/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 40.01 AP - 00274193 10/18/2008 CREATIVE DJs 250.00 AP - 00274194 10/18/2008 CRIDLAND, KYLE 37.44 AP - 00274195 10/I S/2008 CRUZ, PABLO 500.00 AP - 00274196 10/18/2008 CS LEGACY CONSTRUCTION INC. 122,143.61 AP - 00274196 10/18/2008 CS LEGACY CONSTRUCTION INC. 84,456.34 AP - 00274196 10/18/2008 CS LEGACY CONSTRUCTION INC. -12,214.36 AP - 00274196 10/15/2008 CS LEGACY CONSTRUCTION INC. -8,445.63 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.35 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.88 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 711.74 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 366.29 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,029.95 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 583.43 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.14 AP - 00274198 ]0/1S/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,580.47 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,371.93 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,488.65 AP - 00274198 ]0/d5/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.25 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 604.89 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 614.76 AP -00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,047.63 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 923.24 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 920.73 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 285.86 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 489.27 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.67 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 346.55 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.88 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 648.60 AP - 00274198 10/1 S/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 217.14 AP - 00274198 10/1 S/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,570.43 AP-00274198 10/]5/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 109.98 AP-00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,748.40 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.98 AP - 00274198 ]0/IS/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.26 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 255.98 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 293.28 AP - 00274198 ] 0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 332.09 AP - 00274198 ] 0/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.31 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.75 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 226.70 AP - 00274198 10/li/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,402.66 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.64 AP - 00274198 ]0/IS/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.44 AP - 00274198 10/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 432.86 AP - 00274198 ]0/18/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 323.63 P34 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Aeenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 494.60 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.18 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 664.36 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,864.34 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,509.39 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 477.68 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 511.52 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 241.11 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 229.83 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.47 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.54 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,955.08 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.82 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 323.99 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.70 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 588.71 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.30 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.21 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254.90 AP - 00274198 10/15/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.49 AP - 00274199 10/15/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,382.44 AP - 00274199 10/15/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 637.88 AP - 00274199 10/15/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 587.24 AP - 00274200 10/15/2008 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 621.00 AP - 00274202 10/15/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,264.83 AP - 00274203 10/15/2008 DAKOTA BACKFLOW CO. 400.00 AP - 00274204 10/15/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 49,400.00 AP - 00274204 10/15/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 54,690.00 AP - 00274204 10/15/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 23,975.00 AP - 00274205 10/15/2008 DANCE TERRIFIC 2,265.90 AP - 00274206 10/15/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 767.73 AP - 00274207 10/15/2008 DAMS, LENA 360.00 AP - 00274208 10/15/2008 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 18.99 AP - 00274209 10/15/2008 DeFAZIO, SAM 250.00 AP - 00274210 10/15/2008 DELL INC 75.40 AP - 00274211 10/15/2008 DEMCO INC 62.06 AP - 00274212 10/15/2008 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133.20 AP - 00274213 10/15/2008 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 4,864.90 AP - 00274213 10/15/2008 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION -243.25 AP - 00274214 10/15/2008 DIAMONDBACK DRUGS 149.98 AP - 00274214 10/15/2008 DIAMONDBACK DRUGS 45.00 AP - 00274216 10/15/2008 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT INC 120,322.21 AP - 00274216 10/15/2008 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT INC -12;032.22 AP - 00274217 10/15/2008 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 720.00 AP - 00274218 10/15/2008 DUFFY, RICK ~ 2,773.75 AP - 00274219 10/15/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 14.11 AP - 00274219 10/15/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 15.43 AP - 00274219 10/15/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 30.62 AP - 00274220 10/15/2008 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 148.50 AP - 00274220 ] 0/15/2008 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 996.88 AP - 00274221 10/15/2008 DYNALECTRIC 859.65 AP - 00274221 10/15/2008 DYNALECTRIC -85.97 AP - 00274222 10/15/2008 EDFUND ~ 164.91 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274223 10/15/2008 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY 75.00 AP - 00274223 10/1 S/2008 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY 150.00 AP - 00274223 10/1 S/2008 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY 150.00 AP - 00274224 ] 0/1 S/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 260.00 AP - 00274224 10/1S/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,500.00 AP - 00274224 ]0/1S/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 3,905.00 AP - 00274225 10/1S/2008 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 409.02 AP - 00274226 10/15/2008 ENSIL, NORMAN 108.00 AP - 00274227 10/1 S/2008 ESKENAZI, MOISES 50.00 AP - 00274228 10/1 S/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 305.22 AP - 00274228 ]0/1S/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 45.00 AP - 00274230 ]0/1S/2008 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 3,465.00 AP -00274230 ]0/1S/2008 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 3,850.00 AP - 00274231 10/1 S/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 9.61 AP-00274231 ]0/1S/2008 EWINGIRRIGATIONPRODUCTS 183.SS AP - 00274231 10/IS/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 205.94 AP - 00274232 10/I S/2008 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 45.96 AP - 00274233 10/1S/2008 EXTREME ANIMAL NUTRITION 499.24 AP - 00274235 10/15/2008 FANTASTIC SAMS THE ORIGINAL FAMILY HAI] 99.04 AP - 00274236 10/1S/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 701.12 AP - 00274236 10/1S/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 328.25 AP - 00274237 10/1S/2008 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 432.00 AP - 00274239 10/1S/2008 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,750.00 AP - 00274240 ]0/1S/2008 FLEET SERVICES INC. 626.07 AP-00274241 ]0/1S/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 405.00 AP - 00274241 10/1S/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 405.00 AP - 00274241 ]0/1S/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 405.00 AP - 00274243 10/15/2008 FOX CROFT FARMS 112.00 AP - 00274244 10/15/2008 FRAME ART 45.00 AP - 00274245 10/1S/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 174.72 AP - 00274246 10/15/2008 FREDRICS, HEATHER 13.46 AP - 00274248 10/15/2008 GADABOUT VACATIONS 898.20 AP-00274249 10/1S/2008 GADABOUT VACATIONS 2,988.00 AP - 00274250 ] 0/1S/2008 GAIL MATERIALS 4,787.89 AP - 00274253 10/1S/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 300.00 AP - 00274253 10/1S/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 88.89 AP - 00274254 10/15/2008 GILKEY, JOHN 150.00 AP - 002742SS 10/15/2008 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 243.00 AP - 00274257 10/1 S/2008 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 505.23 AP - 00274258 10/1S/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 161.56 AP - 00274258 10/1S/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 38.56 AP - 00274259 10/1 S/2008 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00 AP - 00274260 10/1 S/2008 GONZALES, YOUNG 40.00 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 179.29 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 283.46 AP-0027426] 10/IS/2008 GRAINGER 211.40 AP-0027426] 10/1S/2008 GRAINGER 731.19 AP - 00274261 10/1 S/2008 GRAINGER 489.24 AP-00274261 10/1S/2008 GRAINGER 309.15 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 906.72 AP-00274261 10/1S/2008 GRAINGER 33.07 AP - 00274261 10/1S/2008 GRAINGER 458.29 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 37.62 AP-00274261 10/1S/2008 GRAINGER 19.62 P36 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Ret=ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274261 10/18/2008 GRAINGER 110.29 AP - 00274261 10/1 S/2008 GRAINGER S 1.88 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 18.29 AP - 00274261 10/18/2008 GRAINGER 219.36 AP - 00274261 10/15/2008 GRAINGER 31.13 AP - 00274262 10/18/2008 GRIBBIN, BETH 160.00 AP - 00274263 10/18/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 229.38 AP - 00274264 ] 0/18/2008 HALE, BRUCE 1,125.00 AP - 00274265 10/18/2008 HANGER 18 LLC. 168.00 AP - 00274266 10/15/2008 HASAN, JAMES 672.00 AP - 00274267 10/18/2008 HAVEN AUTO REPAIR 658.78 AP - 00274267 10/18/2008 HAVEN AUTO REPAIR 512.42 AP - 00274268 10/18/2008 HEILIG, KELLY 937.20 AP - 00274269 10/18/2008 HERRERA, ADOLFO 10.00 AP - 00274270 10/15/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 182.96 AP - 00274270 10/18/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 332.36 AP - 00274270 ] 0/18/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 29.56 AP - 00274270 ] 0/18/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 320.88 AP - 00274271 ]0/18/2008 HOGLE-IRELAND 19,238.03 AP - 00274272 10/18/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,815.86 AP - 00274272 10/18/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 606.64 AP - 00274272 10/15/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 608.25 AP - 00274272 10/18/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00274272 10/18/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00274272 10/18/2008 HOLLIDAY' ROCK CO INC 150.00 AP - 00274272 10/15/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,826.36 AP - 00274273 10/18/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 324.59 AP - 00274273 10/18/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 60.29 AP-00274275 10/18/2008 HSU,STEVE 518.40 AP - 00274276 10/18/2008 HUTCHINSON, LISA 787.20 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 316.24 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 171.75 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 14.94 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 120.49 AP - 00274277 10/1S/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 49.36 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 227.41 AP - 00274277 ]0/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 179.69 AP - 00274277 ]0/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 19.75 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 118.29 AP - 00274277 10/18/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 49.36 AP - 00274279 10/18/2008 IBM CORPORATION 638.73 AP - 00274281 10/18/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 179.62 AP - 00274282 10/15/2008 INLAND CUSTOM PUBLISHING GROUP 750.00 AP - 00274282 10/18/2008 INLAND CUSTOM PUBLISHING GROUP 1,250.00 AP - 00274283 ]0/18/2008 INLAND EMPIRE FAMILY 1,080.00 AP - 00274284 10/18/2008 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 1,298.00 AP - 00274288 10/15/2008 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 4,160.00 AP - 00274286 10/18/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 809.73 AP - 00274286 10/1 S/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,028.98 AP - 00274287 ]0/18/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 51.40 AP - 00274287 ]0/18/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 250.79 AP - 00274288 10/18/2008 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 3,515.70 AP - 00274289 ] 0/18/2008 INPRO CORPORATION 633.41 AP - 00274290 10/18/2008 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY GROUP 4,000.00 P37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Timc: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274290 10/15/2008 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY GROUP 18.62 AP - 00274291 10/] 5/2008 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 6,887.50 AP - 00274292 10/15/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 921.38 AP - 00274292 10/15/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 645.35 AP - 00274293 10/15/2008 ITE 42.00 AP - 00274294 10/15/2008 J G CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 500.00 AP - 00274295 10/15/2008 JAVA DICTION COFFEE & MORE 26.00 AP - 00274296 10/15/2008 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 270.00 AP - 00274296 10/15/2008 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 540.00 AP - 00274297 10/15/2008 JURMAN, KIMBERLY 16.15 AP - 00274298 10/15/2008 KIM, DANIEL 588.00 AP - 00274300 10/15/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 28.00 AP - 00274301 10/15/2008 KOONTZ, JOSH 215.20 AP - 00274302 10/15/2008 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 2,750.00 AP - 00274303 10/15/2008 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00 AP - 00274303 10/15/2008 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00 AP - 00274304 10/15/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION INi 94,266.00 AP - 00274304 10/15/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION INi -9,426.60 AP - 00274306 10/15/2008 LAWTECH PUBLISHING CO LTD 51.03 AP - 00274307 10/15/2008 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 327.88 AP - 00274307 10/]5/2008 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 98.25 AP - 00274307 10/15/2008 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 2,906.31 AP - 00274308 10/15/2008 LESTER, RANDY 135.00 AP - 00274309 10/15/2008 LIM, HEATHER 870.00 AP - 00274310 10/15/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 1,219.03 AP - 00274310 10/15/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 335.3 ] AP - 00274310 10/15/2008 LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP - 00274311 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 350.00 AP - 0027431 t 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00274311 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 400.00 AP - 00274311 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTION'S 600.00 AP - 00274311 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 325.00 AP - 00274311 10/15/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00274312 10/15/2008 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 356.40 AP - 00274313 10/15/2008 LONG BEACH SOCCER REFEREE ASSOC 1,018.00 AP - 00274314 10/15/2008 LUCAS, DIAMOND 256.50 AP - 00274315 10/15/2008 MACDONALD, JAMIE 1,690.00 AP - 00274315 10/15/2008 MACDONALD, JAMIE 149.18 AP - 00274316 10/15/2008 MAGIC AND VARIETY ENTERTAINMENT 1,000.00 AP - 00274317 10/15/2008 MAGRUDER, KAREN 189.00 AP - 00274318 10/15/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 24244 AP - 00274319 10/15/2008 MARGORIE ANDERSON & MARK PEACOCK 25,000.00 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 20,950.64 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,323.10 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.74 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,181.84 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,059.08 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 20,950.64 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,323.10 AP - 00274320 10/15/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.74 AP - 00274320 10/t 5/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,181.84 P38 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274320 10/18/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,059.08 AP - 00274320 10/] 8/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP - 00274321 10/15/2008 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 1,656.12 AP - 00274322 10/18/2008 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,582.80 AP - 00274323 10/18/2008 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00274324 10/18/2008 MARY'S GRILL 21.84 AP - 00274325 10/15/2008 MATHIS CONSULTING GROUP 4,985.00 AP - 00274325 10/18/2008 MATHIS CONSULTING GROUP 4,797.50 AP-00274326 ]0/]8/2008 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 157.74 AP - 00274326 10/18/2008 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 76.14 AP - 00274326 10/15/2008 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 648.67 AP - 00274327 10/15/2008 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 60.00 AP - 00274328 10/18/2008 MAYORAL, LUIS 50.00 AP - 00274329 10/18/2008 MCCALEB, ERIN 117.60 AP - 00274329 10/li/2008 MCCALEB, ERIN 547.20 AP - 00274330 10/15/2008 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 123.54 AP - 00274331 ]0/18/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 329.90 AP - 00274331 10/18/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1,095.75 AP - 00274331 10/18/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 71 L00 AP - 00274332 10/15/2008 MERCADO, ESTELA 15.00 AP - 00274333 10/15/2008 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 244.53 AP - 00274333 10/18/2008 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 34.00 AP - 00274334 ] 0/1 S/2008 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 500.00 AP - 00274335 10/15/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 43.98 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 97.96 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 74.97 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 87.96 AP - 00274335 10/15/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 26.98 AP-00274335 10/15/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 44.98 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 12.99 AP-00274335 ]0/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 68.96 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 19.99 AP-00274335 ]0/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 39.98 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 35.97 AP - 00274335 10/]8/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 29.98 AP - 00274335 10/1S/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 12.79 AP - 00274335 10/15/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 87.96 AP - 00274335 10/15/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 96.36 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 48.98 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 21.99 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 46.98 AP - 00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 38.98 AP-00274335 10/18/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 39.98 AP - 00274336 10/18/2008 MOE, JOHN 669.00 AP - 00274337 ]0/18/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 1,364.98 AP - 00274338 10/15/2008 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 40.00 AP - 00274339 10/18/2008 MST VETERINARY SERVICES 6,825.00 AP - 00274340 10/15/2008 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 11,319.14 AP - 00274341 10/IS/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 433.59 AP - 00274341 10/18/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 665.55 AP - 00274341 10/18/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 4,580.45 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 279.17 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 100.27 AP - 00274341 ]0/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 119.23 P39 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 10/29!200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Resister ]0/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP -00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 313.97 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 59.04 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 41.38 AP - 00274341 10/li/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,295.02 AP - 00274341 10/]5/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 415.71 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 13.22 AP - 00274341 10/15/2008 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 304.31 AP - 00274342 ] 0/15/2008 MYERCHIN, NICOLE 2,032.80 AP - 00274343 10/] 5/2008 NAFFZIGER, MICHAEL 97.50 AP - 00274344 10/15/2008 NAGELE, KARL 250.00 AP - 00274348 10/15/2008 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 288.00 AP - 00274349 10/15/2008 NICHOLS, GARY 892.50 AP - 00274350 10/15/2008 NINYO & MOORS 840.25 AP - 00274350 10/15/2008 NINYO & MOORS 1,591.25 AP - 00274350 ] 0/15/2008 NINYO & MOORS 6,880.75 AP - 00274351 10/15/2008 NOBLE. COMPANY, R J 6,847.50 AP - 00274351 10/15/2008 NOBLE COMPANY, R J -684.75 AP - 00274354 10/15/2008 NUON, SONA 100.00 AP - 00274355 10/15/2008 NWOSU, LORETHA 37.44 AP - 00274356 10/15/2008 OAKLEY SALES CORP 121.79 AP - 00274357 ] 0/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00274357 ] 0/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 138.69 AP - 00274357 ] 0/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 115.53 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 102.06 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 103.86 AP - 00274357 10/1 S/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 176.03 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 220.12 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00274357 10/t 5/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00274357 ] 0/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 56.93 AP - 00274357 ] 0/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00274357 10/15/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CAL[FO 128.07 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 72.11 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4.26 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.97 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 110.29 AP - 00274360 10/1 S/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 269.52 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 9.47 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 75.40 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 90.80 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 210.34 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.35 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -14.35 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 43.06 AP - 00274360 ] 0/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 78.23 AP - 00274360 ] 0/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.55 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 22.97 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.54 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 144.86 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 555.20 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.83 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 28.70 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -46.16 P40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Aeenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p47 Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 53.39 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 61.95 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 121.79 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -23.08 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.15 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.37 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 69.24 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.02 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 18.20 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.94 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -6.63 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4.45 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.45 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -7.08 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 53.98 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 83.74 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3,026.10 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ] 3.51 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.63 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 151.53 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 66.65 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ] 13.21 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 5.81 AP -.00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.06 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 86.64 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.56 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 37.60 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,048.45 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4.57 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 183.38 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 75.45 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 129.42 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.14 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,060.98 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.93 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.11 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 91.23 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 18.75 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 56.28 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 20.08 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 539.03 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 85.18 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.43 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 31.82 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.79 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 46.82 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 25.63 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 28.83 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 28.21 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 306.63 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 6.14 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 122.66 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 27.25 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 45.34 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 1 G:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 832.19 AP - 00274360 10/18/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.31 AP - 00274360 10/18/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.96 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1,451.72 AP - 00274360 10/18/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 47.49 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 137.94 AP - 00274360 10/18/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.79 AP - 00274360 10/15/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 10.39 AP - 00274360 10/18/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 342.71 AP - 00274361 10/15/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 1,494.92 AP - 00274362 10/18/2008 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 789.60 AP - 00274363 10/18/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 65.21 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 216.55 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9.84 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 11.82 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 239.98 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 58.59 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 296.27 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 316.56 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 11,36 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.79 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.45 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 28.24 AP - 00274365 10/]8/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.85 AP - 00274365 ]0/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 52.96 AP - 00274365 ]0/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.64 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 35.98 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.70 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 96.95 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.51 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 56.62 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.14 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1.61 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -1.61 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 35.53 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 96.69 AP - 00274365 ]0/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 36.59 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 13.45 AP - 00274365 ]0/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 24.07 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 97.15 AP -00274365 ]0/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.77 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.22 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 59.54 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 100.14 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 59.52 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 75.41 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 27.20 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 42.73 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 52.88 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 538 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 12.85 AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.23 AP-00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 861.71 AP - 00274365 10/15/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY IARDWARE 44.15 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274365 10/18/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.38 AP - 00274366 10/18/2008 ORONA, PATRICIA 465.00 AP - 00274366 10/15/2008 ORONA, PATRICIA 310.00 AP - 00274367 10/15/2008 GRR, PAUL 21.00 AP - 00274369 10/15/2008 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00 AP - 00274370 10/18/2008 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 194.81 AP - 00274371 10/18/2008 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00274372 10/18/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 110.34 AP - 00274373 10/18/2008 PENDLETON PARTNERS INC 15,100.00 AP - 00274374 10/18/2008 PETER M. MAYER PRODUCTIONS 48.00 AP - 00274375 10/15/2008 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 845.26 AP - 00274377 10/15/2008 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 5,086.05 AP - 00274378 10/15/2008 PMI 1,567.70 AP - 00274379 10/15/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 266.49 AP - 00274380 ]0/t 5/2008 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,873.20 AP - 00274380 10/15/2008 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 67.90 AP - 00274381 10/15/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 387.25 AP - 00274381 10/15/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 473.84 AP - 00274381 10/15/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 1,735.86 AP - 00274381 10/15/2008 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 460.13 AP - 00274383 10/15/2008 PURCELL, TANYA 50.00 AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 200.00 AP - 00274384 10/18/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 200.00 AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 200.00 AP - 00274384 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00 AP - 00274385 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 75.00 AP - 00274386 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YM 13,057.93 AP - 00274386 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YM 12,914.86 AP - 00274386 10/15/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YM 11,000.57 AP - 00274387 10/15/2008 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 30.00 AP - 00274387 10/15/2008 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 30.00 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 69.88 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 33.67 AP - 00274388 10/18/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 216.47 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 1,554.05 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 78.50 AP - 00274388 10/18/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 232.97 AP - 00274388 10/18/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 87.12 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 98.97 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 64.49 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 52.64 AP - 00274388 10/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 44.02 AP - 00274388 ] 0/15/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 158.99 AP - 00274389 10/18/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 145.45 AP - 00274390 10/15/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 5,444.00 AP - 00274391 10/18/2008 RICHELIEU GLASS CO 41.08 AP - 00274392 10/15/2008 RIVETT, NLIE M 250.00 AP - 00274393 10/15/2008 RK DIVERSIFIED ENTERTAINMENT INC 230.00 AP - 00274394 ] 0/18/2008 RM DALTON CORP 5,000.00 AP - 00274394 10/15/2008 RM DALTON CORP 10,000.00 AP - 00274395 10/15/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 256.00 AP - 00274395 10/15/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 224.00 AP - 00274396 ] 0/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 108.00 AP - 00274396 ] 0/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 90.00 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez .Page: 29 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Re>?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274396 10/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 100.00 AP - 00274396 10/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00274396 10/] 512008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 70.00 AP - 00274396 10/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 115.00 AP - 00274396 10/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00274396 10/15/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 105.00 AP - 00274397 10/15/2008 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP - 00274398 10/15/2008 ROSAS, JANICE 500.00 AP - 00274399 10/15/2008 ROSAS, LTRIO 100.00 AP - 00274400 10/15/2008 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 64.63 AP - 00274402 10/15/2008 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 109.04 AP - 00274403 10/15/2008 SADDLEBACK FENCE AND VINYL PRODUCTS I 980.00 AP - 00274404 10/15/2008 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 367.80 AP - 00274406 10/t 5/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 394.50 AP - 00274406 10/15/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 526.00 AP - 00274406 10/15/2008 SAN BERNARDEQO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 394.50 AP - 00274407 10/15/2008 SBPEA 276.90 AP - 00274408 10/15/2008 SC FUELS 4,348.29 AP - 00274409 10/15/2008 SCARANQ, TERESA 500.00 AP - 00274410 10/15/2008 SCHEURING, LORI 50.00 AP - 00274411 10/15/2008 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 310.97 AP - 00274412 10/15/2008 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00 AP - 00274413 10/15/2008 SCOTT, MICHAEL 283.98 AP - 00274413 10/15/2008 SCOTT, MICHAEL 1,160.87 AP - 00274413 10/15/2008 SCOTT, MICHAEL -450.00 AP - 00274414 10/15/2008 SHAW STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS GROUP 12,943.51 AP - 00274415 10/15/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP - 00274416 10/15/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 200.80 AP - 00274417 ]0/15/2008 SHRED IT 34.00 AP - 00274417 10/15/2008 SHRED IT 17.00 AP - 00274417 10/15/2008 SHRED IT 17.00 AP - 00274417 10/15/2008 SHRED IT 17.00 AP - 00274418 10/15/2008 SIGN SHOP, THE 308.89 AP - 00274418 10/15/2008 SIGN SHOP, THE 452.55 AP - 00274418 10/15/2008 SIGN SHOP, THE 75.43 AP - 00274419 10/15/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS ~ 1,442.77 AP - 00274420 10/15/2008 SLIMS KEY SHOP 31.62 AP - 00274421 10/15/2008 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,219.00 AP - 00274422 10/15/2008 SOLOMON, LASHONDA 156.00 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,104.91 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,973.81 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.08 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.15 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.71 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.56 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 ' - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.57 AP - 00274428 ]0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.99 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.14 AP - 00274428 ]0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.92 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.04 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.26 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 6.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.28 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.61 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.42 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/ 15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.55 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.61 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.19 AP - 00274428 10/1S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.56 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 ] 0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.84 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.23 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.48 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.94 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.60 AP - 00274428 !0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.52 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.75 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.28 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.85 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/] 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.15 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.45 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.05 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.55 AP - 00274428 ]0/]8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.06 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.00 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.08 AP - 00274428 ] 0/] 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.88 AP - 00274428 10/] 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.96 AP - 00274428 ] 0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.42 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Ret?ister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.05 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.45 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.09 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.08 AP - 00274428 10/1S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.57 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.21 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.03 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.55 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.83 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.55 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.71 AP - 00274428 ] 0/] S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.13 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,323.26 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.63 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.79 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.31 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.71 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.85 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.71 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/] 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.41 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.04 AP - 00274428 ]0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.09 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.36 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.41 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.61 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.50 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.07 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.53 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.55 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.99 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.34 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,474.10 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 26.58 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.83 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.30 AP - 00274428 10/IS/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.24 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.07 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.89 AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.60 AP - 00274428 10/t 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.26 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.77 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.94 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.24 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.52 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.26 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.06 P46 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274428 ] 0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.88 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.00 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFOIL'~IIA EDISON 139.07 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 483.77 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.06 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 26.73 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.81 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.93 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 45.79 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.41 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.23 AP - 00274428 ] 0/] 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.82 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.48 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.74 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.19 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.17 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.46 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.10 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.05 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,269.33 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 954.25 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,102.58 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.51 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.84 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.48 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.25 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.75 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.79 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 237.86 AP - 00274428 10/t 5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.91 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.28 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.38 AP - 00274428 ]0/]5/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.50 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.604.07 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.40 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.79 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.96 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.43 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.43 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.17 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.55 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERA' CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,006.85 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 673.30 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 330.05 P47 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.50 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 ] 0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.99 AP - 00274428 ]0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/1 S/2008 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.57 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 210.22 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.33 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 38.05 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 449.01 AP - 00274428 10/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.92 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. 21.50 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 436.34 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.27 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.56 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.20 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.59 AP - 00274428 ]0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.95 AP - 00274428 10/I 8/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.66 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 ]0/18/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 ]0/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.65 AP - 00274428 10/15/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.55 AP - 00274429 10/18/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 552.00 AP - 00274430 10/15/2008 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 320.00 AP - 0027443] 10/15/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 101.82 AP - 00274431 ]0/15/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 2,055.87 AP - 00274431 10/18/2008 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 703.17 AP - 00274432 10/18/2008 SR BRAY CORP 72,948.90 AP - 00274432 10/18/2008 SR BRAY CORP -7,294.89 AP - 00274433 10/15/2008 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 500.00 AP - 00274433 10/1 S/2008 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 5.000.00 AP - 00274433 10/15/2008 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 1.500.00 AP - 00274433 10/18/2008 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 5,000.00 AP - 00274434 10/18/2008 STANLEY ACCESS INC 52.36 AP-00274435 10/15/2008 STARK, RONALD 2,930.00 AP - 00274436 10/IS/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 689.17 AP - 00274436 10/15/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 1,338.43 AP - 00274436 10/15/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 3,152.53 AP - 00274436 10/15/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 3,000.00 AP - 00274437 10/1 S/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 68.80 AP - 00274437 10/15/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 200.43 AP - 00274437 10/18/2008 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 307.88 AP - 00274438 ]0/15/2008 STEVE AND DAVE MARGOLIN FOUR PLEX 36.35 AP - 00274439 ]0/18/2008 S'IILT CIRCUS 500.00 AP-00274440 10/15/2008 STOFA,70SEPH ]3.00 AP - 00274441 10/15/2008 STOVER SEED COMPANY ~ 2,801.50 P48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 34 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274442 10/15/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 2,400.00 AP - 00274442 10/15/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 112.50 AP - 00274442 10/15/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 400.50 AP - 00274443 10/15/2008 SUNNY EXPRESS INC 56.73 AP - 00274444 10/15/2008 SWEDA, SHANNON 252.00 AP - 00274445 10/15/2008 SYMQUEST SERVICES 500.00 AP - 00274446 10/15/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 82.50 AP - 00274446 10/15/2008 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 251.41 AP - 00274447 10/15/2008 TARACENA, BERTHA 180.00 AP - 00274448 10/15/2008 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 346.61 AP - 00274448 10/15/2008 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 103.66 AP - 00274450 10/15/2008 TERRY, DONNA 136.50 AP - 00274451 10/15/2008 THEWES, KRISTINE 337.50 AP - 00274451 10/15/2008 THEWES, KRISTINE 354.00 AP - 00274452 10/15/2008 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,636.83 AP - 00274453 10/15/2008 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 381.94 AP - 00274454 10/15/2008 TRUSFRAME INC 86.79 AP - 00274456 10/15/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.77 AP - 00274456 10/15/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 50.34 AP - 00274456 10/15/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 1,139.15 AP - 00274456 10/15/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 169.08 AP - 00274457 10/15/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 267.54 AP - 00274457 10/15/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 3,076.60 AP - 00274458 10/15/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 1,680.00 AP - 00274459 10/15/2008 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 1,149.77 AP - 00274460 10/15/2008 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.78 AP - 00274461 10/15/2008 UNITED WAY 304.82 AP - 00274462 10/15/2008 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 11,834.72 AP - 00274462 10/15/2008 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 8,582.03 AP - 00274463 10/15/2008 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,616.40 AP - 00274464 10/15/2008 UPS 68.40 AP - 00274464 10/15/2008 UPS 23.18 AP - 00274464 10/15/2008 UPS 38.86 AP - 00274465 10/15/2008 URBANO, VERNIE 476.00 AP - 00274466 10/15/2008 US IDENTIFICATION MANUAL 88.48 AP - 00274467 10/15/2008 US POSTMASTER 25,000.00 AP - 00274468 10/15/2008 UTI 1,566.11 AP - 00274468 10/15/2008 UTI 706.35 AP - 00274469 10/15/2008 VALDEZ, ED 165.00 AP - 00274470 10/15/2008 VALDEZ, RACHELLE 178.20 AP - 00274471 10/15/2008 VASTA, WILLIAM 188.56 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/t 5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.48 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.00 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.87 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 ] 0/15!2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 P49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Current Date: 10/29/200 ReporhCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50 Aeenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.69 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.62 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 78.42 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.42 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 95.26 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.16 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.86 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.74 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.43 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -1.21 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 65.59 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 69.16 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.10 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 74.49 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -1.21 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.67 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 89.39 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 65.49 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.73 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.07 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.30 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 81.83 User: VLOPEZ -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 36 Current Date: 10/29/200 Repor[:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.19 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.53 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.58 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.02 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.34 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 95.26 AP - 00274480 ] 0/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.18 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 ]0/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.93 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 56.12 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.10 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 ] 0/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.84 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.48 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.46 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.46 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.86 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.56 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/] 5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/]5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.13 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 37 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16: ]4:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check ReEister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 32.71 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.96 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 52.42 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.95 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 48.95 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.18 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 14.44 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.59 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.17 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.10 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.87 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -0.02 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -0.05 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.38 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.19 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.60 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.14 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.24 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.57 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.94 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.27 AP - 00274480 10/]5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -1.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -0.70 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 74.20 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 71.51 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 ] 0/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.20 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 - VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.12 AP - 00274480 10/] 5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 70.64 P52 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 38 Current Datc: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Timc: ] 6:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53 Aeenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/1 S/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.09 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 20.01 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.54 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 98.34 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 98.34 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.73 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.67 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 94.66 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 56.94 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.75 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/1S/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.85 AP - 00274480 10/1S/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.27 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.18 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.36 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.72 AP - 00274480 ] 0/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.83 AP - 00274480 10/1S/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.35 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.89 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.88 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.88 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.05 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 96.56 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 69.27 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.90 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.46 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 109.21 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.34 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.82 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6.20 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6.06 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6.06 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 7.62 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6.75 AP - 00274480 10/] 5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6.06 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.91 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.24 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 39 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 65.43 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.73 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.95 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -1.00 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 48.09 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.43 AP - 00274480 ]0/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.07 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.87 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.12 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.88 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.86 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.58 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.33 AP - 00274480 10/18/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.41 AP - 00274480 10/]5/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 77.26 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.12 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 31.80 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 20.01 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.48 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.82 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 32.41 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERILON WIRELESS - LA 37.85 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.27 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.25 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 98.34 AP - 00274480 10/15/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.93 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 69.96 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 21.60 AP - 00274482 1011 S/2008 VERIZON 19.22 AP - 00274482 10/]5/2008 VERIZON 1,367.11 AP - 00274482 10/18/2008 VERIZON 19.66 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 71.39 AP - 00274482 ]0/18/2008 VERIZON 191.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 45.72 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 40 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 147.13 AP - 00274482 ]0/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 382.49 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 35.92 AP-00274482 ]0/]5/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 91.51 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 118.55 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 127.45 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 40.68 AP-00274482 10/]5/2008 VERIZON 219.56 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP-00274482 ]0/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP-00274482 ]0/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/] 5/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 35.68 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 19.66 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 70.89 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 34.97 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 190.48 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 59.00 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 33.89 AP-00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 653.60 AP - 00274482 10/15/2008 VERIZON 358.86 AP - 00274483 10/15/2008 VIASYN INC. 3,000.00 AP - 00274484 10/15/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 3,018.70 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 41 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: ]6:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA At=enda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274484 10/IS/2008 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 135.55 AP - 00274485 10/15/2008 VISTA PAINT 23.95 AP - 00274485 10/15/2008 VISTA PAINT 516.42 AP - 00274485 10/15/2008 VISTA PAINT 47.91 AP - 00274486 10/1S/2008 VOSS, STEPHANIE 69.62 AP - 00274487 10/15/2008 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1,148.92 AP - 00274488 10/15/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 841.85 AP - 00274488 10/15/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 263.66 AP - 00274488 10/15/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 100.84 AP - 00274488 10/15/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 635.39 AP - 00274488 ]0/1S/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 43.40 AP - 00274488 10/1S/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 119.88 AP - 00274489 10/1 S/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 263.34 AP - 00274489 10/1 S/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 168.40 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 881.29 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 290.22 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 84.48 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 58.62 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 108.00 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 462.73 AP - 00274489 10/15/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 501.34 AP - 00274489 10/IS/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 420.10 AP - 00274490 10/15/2008 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10 AP - 00274491 10/15/2008 WESTCOAST MEDIA 849.00 AP - 00274492 10/15/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC SS.48 AP - 00274493 10/] 5/2008 WF CONSTRUCTION INC 15,000.00 AP - 00274495 10/15/2008 WILLIAM FOX 15,000.00 AP - 00274496 10/15/2008 WILMINGTON ASSOC COMMERCIAL PRPTY RE 1,152.00 AP - 00274497 10/15/2008 WILSON AND BELL 200.27 AP - 00274497 10/1S/2008 WILSON AND BELL 337.06 AP - 00274497 10/15/2008 WILSON AND BELL 533.64 AP - 00274498 10/15/2008 WOOD, DAVID 2,000.00 AP - 00274498 10/15/2008 WOOD, DAVID -140.00 AP - 00274500 10/15/2008 YANCY, MICHELLE 100.00 AP - 00274501 10/15/2008 YOUNG, LISA 250.00 AP - 00274502 10/15/2008 ZAILO, ROBERT 100.80 AP - 00274502 10/15/2008 ZAILO, ROBERT 43.20 AP - 00274503 10/15/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 475.27 AP - 00274503 10/15/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 1,142.85 AP - 00274503 10/IS/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 464.47 AP - 00274503 10/15/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 218.10 AP - 00274504 10/22/2008 2-]-1 SAN BERNARDINO 44.51 AP - 00274505 10/22/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 362.07 AP - 00274505 10/22/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 89.86 AP - 00274505 10/22/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC -89.46 AP - 00274506 10/22/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7.54 AP - 00274507 10/22/2008 ACCELA INC 609.70 AP - 00274508 10/22/2008 ACUTINT AND GRAPHICS 135.00 AP - 00274508 ] 0/22/2008 ACUTINT AND GRAPHICS ] 35.00 AP - 00274509 10/22/2008 ADVENTNET INC 4,780.00 AP - 00274510 10/22/2008 AFLAC 4,856.08 AP - 0027451 I 10/22/2008 AGI GENERAL CONTRACTING 10,000.00 AP - 00274512 10/22/2008 AGILINE INC 400.00 AP - 00274512 10/22/2008 AGILINE INC 800.00 P56 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 42 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274512 10/22/2008 AGILINE INC 600.00 AP - 00274512 10/22/2008 AGILINE INC 4,600.00 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 100.88 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 64.96 AP - 00274513 10/22/2008 AIRGAS WEST 786.03 AP - 00274514 10/22/2008 ALI, MOHAMMED 500.00 AP - 00274516 ] 0/22/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMEA'T CO 38.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008, ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00274517 10/22/2008 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00274518 10/22/2008 ANDRADE, LAINI 53.24 AP - 00274519 ]0/22/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00274520 ] 0/22/2008 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 709.97 AP - 00274521 10/22/2008 AUTO BODY 92.00 AP - 00274523 10/22/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 8,948.44 AP - 00274524 10/22/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 195.03 AP - 00274524 10/22/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 390.82 AP - 00274525 10/22/2008 BARTOS-POOL, GAYLE 100.00 AP - 00274527 10/22/2008 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 1,347.73 AP - 00274528 ]0/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.17 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.93 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.68 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 541.68 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.76 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.80 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.88 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.21 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 161.86 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.67 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 93.09 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1 ] 7.20 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 170.23 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.02 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 562.73 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.64 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26 P57 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 43 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.46 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.88 AP - 00274528 10/22/2008 BRODART BOOKS 71.32 AP - 00274529 10/22/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERiVI CARE 514.92 AP - 00274530 10/22/2008 CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC 5,239.98 AP - 00274531 10/22/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 89.27 AP - 00274531 10/22/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 224.03 AP - 00274531 10/22/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 210.50 AP - 00274531 10/22/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 74.25 AP - 00274532 10/22/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 940.32 AP - 00274533 10/22/2008 CASTILLO, JESSIE 250.00 AP - 00274534 10/22/2008 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 8055 AP - 00274535 10/22/2008 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 32.99 AP - 00274536 10/22/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00274538 10/22/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 326.48 AP - 00274539 10/22/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00274540 10/22/2008 COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL, THE 18,300.00 AP - 00274540 10/22/2008 COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL, THE -5,490.00 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 20.00 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 26.67 AP - 0027454] 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 226.70 AP - 00274541 ] 0/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 53.34 AP - 00274541 10/22/2008 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00274542 10/22/2008 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 00274543 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY ]AAP 27.00 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364.88 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 479.09 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 307.38 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.44 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104.03 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 325.7] AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 297.20 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.85 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.]8 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,107.11 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 746.87 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 631.68 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.40 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.38 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.39 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 159.02 AP - 00274545 ] 0/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 772.68 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.86 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 734.61 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,632.47 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 690.90 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 386.34 P58 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 44 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P59 Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.46 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,645.16 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.46 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 349.01 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.63 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,128.00 AP - 00274545 ] 0/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.67 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,301.12 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,434.57 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.88 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8,918.21 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.36 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 572.78 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 868.25 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67.01 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230.57 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 457.94 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 453.35 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,054.68 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.76 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.95 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 16.81 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,018.56 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.95 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.98 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.23 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326.81 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.50 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,263.36 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 638.73 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.52 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.72 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,624.01 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,838.64 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,435.38 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,632.78 AP - 00274545 10/22/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 893.94 AP - 00274547 10/22/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,700.28 AP - 00274547 10/22/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 2,295.27 AP - 00274548 10/22/2008 DATA QUICK 130.50 AP - 00274549 10/22!2008 DAMS, AZIZA 27.50 AP - 00274550 10/22/2008 DAMS, SAM 250.00 AP - 00274551 10/22/2008 DEL MECHANICAL 226.50 AP - 00274551 10/22/2008 DEL MECHANICAL 1,375.00 AP - 00274552 10/22/2008 DEMCO INC 465.12 AP - 00274552 10/22/2008 DEMCO INC 31.95 AP - 00274556 10/22/2008 DMJM HARRIS 24,606.60 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DLTNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 46.73 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 215.64 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 118.58 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION -16.27 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 16.27 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 49.72 AP - 00274558 10/22/2008 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 9.92 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 45 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274559 10/22/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 60.26 AP - 00274559 10/22/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 14.00 AP - 00274559 10/22/2008 EASTER, PAMELA -16.99 AP - 00274559 10/22/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 19.00 AP - 00274559 10/22/2008 EASTER, PAMELA 139.23 AP - 00274560 10/22/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 3,470.00 AP - 00274561 10/22/2008 EMBERTON, JOYCE L. 500.00 AP - 00274564 10/22/2008 ESGIL CORPORATION 12,100.00 AP - 00274565 10/22/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 176.54 AP - 00274565 10/22/2008 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 664.93 AP - 00274566 10/22/2008 EXTREME ANIMAL NUTRITION 499.24 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.49 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.35 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.52 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.85 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.35 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22!2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.38 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.46 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 70.64 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.64 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.05 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.31 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.31 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.52 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 ]0/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 ]0/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.35 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.31 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.52 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 P60 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 46 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61 Agenda Check Register ]0/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 32.02 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 32.02 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ] 9.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ] 6.52 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 36.17 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10.29 AP - 00274570 ] 0/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 26.20 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 32.02 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 32.02 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 26.20 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 47 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 26.20 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.75 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.31 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.89 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.79 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 58.65 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 57.84 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 53.15 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 57.84 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.89 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 52.28 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.31 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 38.67 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.10 AP - 00274570 10!22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 38.67 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.72 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10.29 AP - 00274570 10/22/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 70.64 AP - 00274572 10/22/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 851.20 AP - 00274575 ~ 10/22/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 16.81 AP - 00274575 10/22/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 151.73 AP - 00274579 10/22/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 837.32 AP - 00274582 10/22/2008 HERRNBERGER, VIKI 245.00 AP - 00274583 10/22/2008 HLP INC. 3,000.00 AP - 00274584 10/22/2008 HOGLE-IRELAND 66,063.59 AP - 00274586 10/22/2008 HOPPER, LAURIE 14.50 AP - 00274586 10/22/2008 HOPPER, LAURIE 185.00 AP - 00274586 10/22/2008 HOPPER, LAURIE 185.00 AP - 00274587 10/22/2008 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 275.00 AP - 00274588 10/22/2008 IBM CORPORATION 224.42 AP - 00274588 10/22/2008 IBM CORPORATION 384.48 AP - 00274588 10/22/2008 IBM CORPORATION 2,833.35 AP - 00274588 10/22/2008 IBM CORPORATION 866.31 AP - 00274588 10/22/2008 IBM CORPORATION 10,659.88 AP - 00274589 10/22/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 33.02 AP - 00274589 10/22/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 574.73 AP - 00274589 10/22/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 677.12 AP - 00274590 10/22/2008 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 265.24 AP - 00274591 10/22/2008 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,939.00 AP - 00274592 10/22/2008 INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 1,743.08 AP - 00274593 10/22/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 243.49 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 598.75 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 872.50 P62 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 48 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:142 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 820.00 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 122.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN' 127.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 197.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 483.75 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 537.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 827.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 837.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 238.75 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 186.25 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 217.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 276.25 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 477.50 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 270.00 AP - 00274594 10/22/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 815.00 AP - 00274595 10/22/2008 INPRO CORPORATION 531.39 AP - 00274596 10/22/2008 INSIGHT 82.37 AP - 00274597 10/22/2008 INTERACT POWER INC 2,755.43 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 225.57 AP - 00274598 10/22/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 204.35 AP - 00274599 10/22/2008 JACKSON, JAYE 50.00 AP - 00274600 10/22/2008 K.B LEUNG AND ASSOCIATES INC 450.00 AP - 00274601 10/22/2008 KAPCO 820.04 AP - 00274602 10/22/2008 KELLY EQUIPMENT 84.70 AP - 00274602 10/22/2008 KELLY EQUIPMENT 162.78 AP - 00274603 10/22/2008 KING, TIFFANY 40.00 AP - 00274605 10/22/2008 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 1,159.71 AP - 00274606 10/22/2008 KONE INC 457.74 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 44.45 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 22.88 AP - 00274607 ]0/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 852.08 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 2.66 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 39.46 AP - 00274607 10/22/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 28.63 AP - 00274609 10/22/2008 LAM, JACK 163.21 AP - 00274609 10/22/2008 LAM, JACK 47.52 AP - 00274609 10/22/2008 LAM, JACK 20.55 AP - 00274610 10/22/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 25,000.00 AP - 00274611 10/22/2008 LE MOND, PATRICIA 370.00 AP - 00274614 10/22/2008 LOWE, SHEILA 100.00 AP - 00274615 10/22/2008 MALLORY, MICHAEL 100.00 AP - 00274616 10/22/2008 MARICIC; MARIA 185.00 AP - 002746]7 10/22/2008 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 37.77 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 357.09 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -89.27 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 297.00 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -74.25 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 271.00 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -67.75 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 376.10 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -94.03 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 249.00 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -62.25 AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 842.00 P63 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 49 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through ]0/2812008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274618 10/22/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -210.50 AP - 00274619 10/22/2008 MATHIS CONSULTING GROUP 750.00 AP - 00274621 10/22/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 13.14 AP - 00274623 10/22/2008 MENDOZA, CARMEN 64.00 AP - 00274624 10/22/2008 MH SOFTWARE INC 324.00 AP - 00274625 10/22/2008 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 1,437.50 AP - 00274625 10/22/2008 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 250.00 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 32.98 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 32.98 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 30.98 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 30.98 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 87.33 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 87.33 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 802.75 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 188.68 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 491.54 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 358.83 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 231.24 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 167.28 AP - 00274626 10/22/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 14.99 AP - 00274627 10/22/2008 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA Ii 515.07 AP - 00274628 10/22/2008 MOOSE POINT TECH 10,775.00 AP - 00274628 10/22/2008 MOOSE POINT TECH 9,848.90 AP - 00274629 10/22/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 581.85 AP - 00274630 10/22/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 410.52 AP - 00274630 10/22/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 200.00 AP - 00274631 10/22/2008 MT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE 300.00 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -48.9 ] AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -35.56 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -29.09 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 123.09 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 220.66 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.83 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 34.75 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 59.69 AP - 00274632 10/22/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -98.79 AP - 00274634 10/22/2008 NETIQ CORPORATION 2,160.00 AP - 00274635 10/22/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 365.00 AP - 00274635 10/22/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 302.00 AP - 00274635 10/22/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 128.07 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.01 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 63.03 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 15.46 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.04 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.35 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.02 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 202.07 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.69 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 24.79 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -24.99 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -9.46 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.04 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 91.99 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 165.08 P64 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 50 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65 Aeenda Check Ret=ister ]0/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -24.33 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 69.49 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 55.56 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 47.26 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.41 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.24 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 7.47 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 148.65 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 144.10 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 11.50 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 64.98 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.42 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 189.52 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -901.87 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 926.86 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.04 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.75 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 42.46 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 216.61 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 14.35 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -14.35 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 63.03 AP - 00274637 10/22/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 15.46 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 69.30 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 52.47 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 86.63 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 GRKIN PEST CONTROL 86.63 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 GRKIN PEST CONTROL 52.47 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 114.40 AP - 00274638 10/22/2008 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 39.00 AP - 00274639 10/22/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 28.96 AP - 00274639 10/22/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 188.56 AP - 00274640 10/22/2008 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 7,129.07 AP - 00274640 10/22/2008 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 2,528.33 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENE 235.79 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 2,900.00 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 4,400.00 AP - 00274641 10/22/2008 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 144.54 AP - 00274642 10/22/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 240.14 AP - 00274643 10/22/2008 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 177.53 AP - 00274644 10/22/2008 PHILLIPS, DON AND CINDY 15.00 AP - 00274645 10/22/2008 PHILLIPS, GARY 100.00 AP - 00274646 10/22/2008 PITNEY BOWES 25,000.00 AP - 00274647 10/22/2008 PORRAZZO, JOE 100.00 AP - 00274648 10/22/2008 PORT SUPPLY 1,663.86 AP - 00274649 10/22/2008 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 111.16 AP - 00274650 10/22/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80 AP - 00274651 10/22/2008 PRINCIPAL LIFE 2, ] 70.05 AP - 00274652 10/22/2008 PROJECT SISTER 150.00 AP - 00274653 10/22/2008 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 7,500.00 AP - 00274654 10/22/2008 QUAINTANCE, TY 400.00 AP - 00274654 10/22/2008 QUAINTANCE, TY 263.26 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTI V E 224.58 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 51 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 45.79 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 224.58 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 240.52 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 191.01 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 53.31 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 170.75 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 38.31 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 268.92 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 195.00 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 327.14 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 193.48 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.00 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 398.71 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 38.31 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 38.31 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008. R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 68.88 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 47.05 AP - 00274655 10/22/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.55 AP - 00274656 10/22/2008 RAMIREZ, JOSE 250.00 AP - 00274657 10/22/2008 RANCHO FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES 421.35 AP - 00274659 10/22/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 8.08 AP - 00274660 10/22/2008 RCPD EAC 180.00 AP - 00274661 10/22/2008 RCPFA 8,674.1 I AP - 00274662 10/22/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 881.69 AP - 00274663 ] 0/22/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 114.47 AP - 00274664 10/22/2008 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 2,388.00 AP - 00274665 10/22/2008 REED SMITH LLP 617.50 AP - 00274666 10/22/2008 REFLEX CORPORATION 360.00 AP - 00274667 10/22/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 256.00 AP - 00274667 10/22/2008 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 256.00 AP - 00274668 10/22/2008 ROSHAN PROPERTIES 1NC 270.01 AP - 00274669 10/22/2008 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 481.04 AP - 00274670 10/22/2008 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 570.00 AP - 00274671 10/22/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,311.]6 AP - 00274672 10/22/2008 SCHTT, CORINNE 100.00 AP - 00274673 10/22/2008 SCOTT, MICHAEL 250.00 AP - 00274674 10/22/2008 SHOETERIA 200.00 AP - 00274675 10/22/2008 SIGMANET 254.00 AP - 00274675 10/22/2008 SIGMANET 20.00 AP - 00274675 10/22/2008 SIGMANET 317.72 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.57 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.13 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,36].64 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHER\' CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.72 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.86 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.25 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.47 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.50 AP - 00274677 ]0/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.68 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 P66 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 52 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.38 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.96 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.22 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.45 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.94 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.67 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.33 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.86 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.79 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.40 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.67 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.39 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,629.87 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,333.23 AP - 00274677 10/22/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.97 AP - 00274678 10/22/2008 SPAGNOLO, SAM 246.51 AP - 00274678 10/22/2008 SPAGNOLO, SAM 539.92 AP - 00274679 10/22/2008 SPARKLETTS 25.00 AP - 00274680 10/22/2008 SPECIALTIES INC 929.50 AP - 00274681 10/22/2008 STERICYCLE INC 520.93 AP - 00274682 10/22/2008 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 1,616.25 AP - 00274683 10/22/2008 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 2,570.91 AP - 00274684 10/22/2008 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 75.00 AP - 00274684 10/22/2008 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 75.00 AP - 00274684 10/22/2008 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 75.00 AP - 00274684 10/22/2008 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 75.00 AP - 00274685 10/22/2008 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 29.57 AP - 00274686 10/22/2008 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 281.25 AP - 00274686 10/22/2008 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 3,005.36 AP - 00274687 10/22/2008 TBH INC 4,677.00 AP - 00274687 10/22/2008 TBH INC 4,705.00 AP - 00274687 10/22/2008 TBH INC 1,696.00 AP - 00274689. 10/22/2008 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 363.28 AP - 00274690 10/22/2008 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES L 646.50 AP - 00274691 10/22/2008 TIACHAROEN, SAM LE 92.00 AP - 00274692 10/22/2008 TOM SAWYER PRODUCTIONS INC 100.00 AP - 00274693 10/22/2008 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 3,319.27 AP - 00274693 10/22/2008 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,355.00 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,922.69 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 286.60 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 731.57 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,785.33 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,014.07 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 23,034.86 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE ] 6,828.97 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 57.34 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,521.30 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,145.90 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 30,397.03 User: VLOPEZ -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 53 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P68 Asenda Check Resister 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 7,033.69 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,497.09 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,022.13 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,315.88 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 347.61 AP - 00274695 10/22/2008 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,075.90 AP - 00274696 10/22/2008 TUXEDO JUNCTION 41.50 AP-00274698 10/22/2008 UNISOURCEWORLDWIDEINC 834.36 AP - 00274699 10/22/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00 AP - 00274700 10/22/2008 UPGRADE GROUP INC, THE 1,947.00 AP - 00274701 10/22/2008 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 7,502.70 AP - 00274702 10/22/2008 USA TODAY 176.30 AP - 00274703 10/22/2008 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 1,010.71 AP - 00274704 10/22/2008 VASTA, WILLIAM 269.38 AP - 00274705 10/22/2008 VEND U COMPANY 54.78 AP - 00274705 10/22/2008 VEND U COMPANY 66.00 AP - 00274706 10/22/2008 VERIZON BUSINESS 45.45 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.58 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 78.10 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 468.08 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 34.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 105.97 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 V ERIZON 34.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 48.36 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 41.79 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 104.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 19.67 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 19.67 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 34.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 21.53 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 19.67 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 V ERIZON 82.41 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 72.96 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 48.92 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 67.81 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 34.55 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 21.48 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 87.94 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 36.83 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 151.78 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 V ERIZON 21.48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pagc: 54 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:]4:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 Agenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 V ERIZON 45.66 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 45.66 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 33.90 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 135.65 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 104.98 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 162.80 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 67.81 AP - 00274709 10/22/2008 VERIZON 1,313.34 AP - 00274710 10/22/2008 VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD 10.00 AP - 00274711 10/22/2008 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 250.00 AP - 00274712 10/22/2008 VILLENAS, FABIAN 67.28 AP - 00274712 10/22/2008 VILLENAS, FABIAN 499.12 AP - 00274713 10/22/2008 VOSKERITCHIAN, JENNIFER 128.96 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 251.32 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 46.36 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 36.32 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 95.00 AP - 00274714 10/22/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 26.71 AP - 00274715 10/22/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 659.88 AP - 00274715 10/22/2008 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 84.24 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 2,390.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 500.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 1,748.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 2,922.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 2,535.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 1,020.00 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 626.29 AP - 00274716 10/22/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 1,314.18 AP - 00274717 10/22/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 76.96 AP - 00274717 10/22/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 96.87 AP - 00274717 10/22/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 299.50 AP - 00274718 10/22/2008 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 21,318.32 AP - 00274719 10/22/2008 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 244.16 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP-00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274721 10/22/2008 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00274722 10/22/2008 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 3,150.00 AP - 00274723 10/22/2008 WING STOP 103.00 AP - 00274724 10/22/2008 WOLF, LORI 100.00 AP - 00274725 10/22/2008 YORK INDUSTRIES 603.40 AP - 00274726 10/22/2008 ZIMMON, ANITA 60.00 Total for Check ID AP: 4,619,141.23 EP - 00000050 10/15/2008 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 3,000.00 EP - 00000050 10/15/2008 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 192,192.00 EP - 0000005 ] 10/15/2008 VERNON, CITY OF 174,990.00 EP - 00000085 10/23/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,133,854.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 55 Current Date: 10/29/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:14:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Register 10/8/2008 through 10/28/2008 Check No. Check Date Vendur Name Amoun[ EP - 00000085 10/23/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 29,334.00 Total for Check ID EP: 2,533,370.00 Total for Entity: 7,152,511.23 P70 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 56 ReporLCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Current Date: 10/29/200 Time: 16:14:2 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: To: From: By: Subject: November 5, 2008 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RANCHO cUCAMONGA Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE STREET BANNER SCHEDULE AND APPLICATIONS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2009 RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the attached street banner schedule for calendar year 2009. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Annually, the Community Services Department requests applications for banner displays on Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. According to City policy, only City sponsored events and activities are eligible to display banners. The only exception to this rule applies to those organizations that are supported by the City and have a history of advertising specific events on street banners. These groups provide us a ready-made banner at their cost. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the street banner applications and schedule for calendar year 2009 at their October 16, 2008, meeting and recommended approval. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact. Community Services Director Attachments I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&BOardslCityCouncillStaHReports120081 StreetBanners.110508.doc P71 P72 Banner Display Schedule 2009 Organization Event Event Date Display Dates Location City of RC -CSD Frog and Toad Jan. 26 -Feb. 14 Jan. 26 -Feb. 16 Base Line City of RC -Library Telethon March 13 -March 15 March 2 -March 16 Archibald City of RC -CSD Spring Registration N/A March 2 -March 16 Base Line City of RC -CSD CSD Job Faire March 28 March 16 -March 30 Base Line RC Quakes Opening Day April 13 March 3D -April 13 Both City of RC -Library National Library Week April 12 -18 April 13 -April 20 Archibald City of RC -CSD Ferdinand the Bull April 18 -May 2 April 13-April 20 Base Line City of RC -CSD Wellness Faire May 1 April 20 -May 4 Base Line CVWD Water Awareness Day May 9 May 4 -May 11 Archibald City of RC -RDA Business Appreciation Week May11-May 17 May 11 -May 18 Base Line City of RC -CSD Season Ticket Sales TBD May 18 -June 1 Base Line City of RC -CSD Summer Registration N/A May 18 -June 1 Archibald City of RC -Fire RC Fire Benefit Car Show June 21 June 8 -June 22 Archibald City of RC -CSD 4th of July Spectacular July 4 June 8 -July 6 Base Line City of RC -CSD Summer Concerts and Movies July 6 -August 7 July 6 -August 7 Base Line City of RC -CSD Fall Registration N/A August 17 -August 31 Both City of RC -Fire National Fire Prevention Week Open House October 10 Sept. 28 -Oct. 12 Both City of RC -CSD Founders Festival Nov. 6 - 8; Nov. 14 - 15 October 26 - Nov. 15 Base Line City of RC -CSD Founders Pumpkin Race November 7 October 19 - Nov. 2 Archibald City of RC -CSD Founders Community Parade November 14 November 2 - 9 Archibald City of RC -Fire Spark of Love Thanksgiving -Christmas Nov. 9 - Dec. 28 Archibald City of RC -CSD Snowflake Festival December 12 Nov. 30 -Dec. 14 Base Line City of RC -CSD Winter Registration N/A Dec. 14 -Dec. 21 Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: _ LC,N~l~ ~I ~U ~ ~ Uy ~~ 1~t5 G q DeparlIt Iment W u Contact ~nnLtfi~ /UI~U,mo{l~o Phone: 90~-"7~~-2~~0 XZZOS E-mail: Q ~~U>`~OIO ~L C~~I,,11I4 (IT f C(,. (/iS n Address:y'} ~,,.+~05 nCU ~ly/Q.~ (,1•,VL~Y ()r'~V tr City: h~Ur~cl~o C~` ~11YYLG1't~Q State: l n Zip: ~~ ~"J~ Q i BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: A ~%j ~r~ f (1 Date of EvendProgram: 7QnU[~r t ~ U Brief description of event I(1 t >L ~ fi {{~~ Requested Dates of Banner Display From: Q- '~4~ z~ To: I Location: ase ine Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and arcwork Maii~Stvui- i~hcG~tr~ (+Gm~c~r~yy Pf'eScrlts ~ YEft-~ w cT-+ FRob ~i`NND TO~p 4nuai~ 31 - 1=~bvuur~ 1~ , 2t~y rnR T~ eic~r~ i'hu- 409- ti ~ ~ -z ~5z yr Visi ~ Itwtsf"~m,7vollAVhDUSc . uTm I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization co submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, is officers, employees and agena from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either t ersons or pro rcy ~ ich may be sustained while this banner is posted. ~: f Signature: % • n ~ Date: aQ~15 US P73 Date Received Date heard by Commission Dace Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Daces Approved Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Dateheard by Council _ Council Attion: #Approved #Denied Locar]on: Archibald Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization~~: //11 ~ `~, Q.arn~-~+-~ "~^~"w~ ~tiDepartment: ~-L'71V1'1'1 ~tR/ lX~~ Contact h.~-~ J Phone: X b ~J~3 E-mail: Address: Ciry: State: Zip: BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: d ~ p! 'h'1 C Date of Event/Program: ~ "w ~ Brief description of event ~ a Requested Dates of Banner Display From:. RlLt,~'1 To: ~'1 CVL cJf~ ~ ~ Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, arnvork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork V W// ` I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injurry~~,,ei""the~~r to persons or pro~p%er~~y, which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature• U`~-"- / "~n~` """' Date: ~ l r ~1 ~ Date Received "L/ 1 T+/[J`P~ Date Reviewed by Staff ~ )~ ~ ~~ ~ C~ Staff Reviewer \ ~ K F"~ ~ra` New applicant #Yes o New Banner #Yes N~q Dates Approved Daces Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archi ald Location: Base Line P74 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APP!_ICATION Organizatio,/n: ~ l~l/~ D~ ~ ,C- Department CSD Contact /~C,li-V l~X Phone: ~U'?-i-1~7-2-7(Dh X 2~~~ E-mail: Address ~~500 ~' I V i C C~.PI ~.t' ,I~ r - City: ~yylchc~ l A n~G i~ onCaA State: ~ Zip: ~ I ~ 3 h BANNER INFORMATION EventlProgram: `~nh -Fa i ~' ` , Date of EventlProgram: S A~ . I`-'l R'f C r 2-~ 2~~ Brief description of event ob Fa'r ~ r- Pp~jDlhy tv1 C 1!l~ Requested Dates of Banner Display From~3l(~'1 O`~ To: 03 Location: Base Line Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork I have.received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold har less the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or inj ry eit er~o persons or pry which may sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer ,New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dares Approved Dates Approved Date: ~ 4 ZZ ~ Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Attion: #Approved #Denied Location; Archibald Location: Base Line P75 Archibald Both ;qy/„ •' .,nanny ~~uC.c rrt P76 _Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department STREETi BANNER ARPLICA'i"ION OrganlZaClon: RanrY,n ftiiramnnga Diehl i t T i h i DepartmenL: T i hra rtr Contact Vivian Garcia Phone:_ 909-a77=2720. ext. SOaO E-mail: v4arcia@cityofrc.com Address: 7368 Archibald Avenue City' Rancho Cucamonga State: CA Zip: 91230 BANNER INFORMATION EvendProgram: Telethon 2D09 Date of EvenrlPcogram: _ Brief descripdon of event: A fundraiser from the Library Foundation Board for the March 2 2009 March 16 2009 Requested Dates of Banner Display From: 70; Location: Base Line Archibald Both ---.,.. Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be,processed wirhout proposed text and artwork White background with graphics and black wording. inviting the public to watch and donate to the Library. I have received a copy, have read and undersand, and agree co abide by~rhe rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve az the primarycontacc I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. its officers, employees and agena from any and all liability fordamages or loss or injury either co persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: V'~x~ R~lc~.~[.~-a Date: _october 2. 2008 Dale Received Date heard by Commission Date Reviewed'by Sniff Recommended byLommission: #Yes .#No Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Daces Approved Dates Approved March 13-'15., 20D9 If no,~why not recommended Date heard by Council _ Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line 09(26./2008 10:43 9094615005 QUAKES BASEBALL PAGE 02/02 P77 b City of Rancho Cucaunonga j Community Service:: Department STREiIET BANNER. APPLICATION t Organization: f~ /`-ANC(f~'~O W ~1MOI~fr/1 UCUA ~/Depaiune/npc 1"I~'~~`~f1.~15 Contact )p/ ~~*~~~}11nU~ } U~~'('~I Pho/n~e:~,~l Q q ~`yo r ' SoO~ x a f 3 E-mail: ('~J rf1"i W [® ~~a~-~VAK~isn[ .' Wh-'r Address: 6 7~~j "'d~ I%'Sr~iQ ny~ /~~ n City: ~~(ar+~ ~~~t!1~f1f{ State: '/~' Zip. `7~~~~ BANNER INFO MA//~~T~~I~~O',N /~- `l EventlProgram: --k~~ S/R ri G+~._ ~1dP~~lr~ ~ ~ 7 Date of EvenUProgram: fuDlJ~,yQ ri ~}82fL ~~ o20~q Brief description of event: _. ? Requested Dates of Banner Displa.r From:~3~ To: ~ ~ 3 Location: Base Line Ar:hibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Appiicacions will not be processed without proposed text and artwork ~~ ~PP~ ~ 13, ~ ag ~ ~'enol me f;~l,~o-f;ee ~~-s~ . I have received a copy, have read and ~. nderstand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Poliq.l hive been fully author red by the above organiation to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless she Clry a{ Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either persons or I: t'opercy which may be sustained while this banner i posted. ~ ~ al ~,~'~/ 90~ Signature: y~~spryv Date: • Dace Received ..___, Date heard by Commission Date Reviewed by Staff _,_ Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No Staff Reviewer __ New applicant »Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved ..~ If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Attien: tlApprovod #Denied Lapvon: Archi I Loction: Base Line {-1 stn ~ ~1~nn7~ „ _ City of Rancho Cucamonga it Community'Services Department STREET PANNE t r4E'PLICATION /Su.ec P78 Organization: Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Department Library Contact Vivian Garcia Phone: 909-477-2720, ext. 5040 E-mail: voarcia@citvo£rc.com Address: 7368 Archibald Avieaue Ciry; Rancha Cucamonga State:. CA :Zip; 91730 BANNER,INFORMi4T10N Event/Program: National Library week Date of-.EvendProgram: April 12-18, 2009 Brief description of event Requested Dates of Banner Displa rom: 4/9/09 To: 4/20/09 Location: Base Line Archibal ~~~ Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork Whitebackground, black printing with dates of National Library 'Week. I have received a copy, have read and: understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry:of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I. have beenfully authorized by the above organization to submit this farm and serve as the. primary contact I hereby. hold harmless the Ciry of:Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agenu from,any andall liabiliryior damages or loss or injury either to persons orproperry which maybesustained whllethis banner is posted, Signature: ~~It-eL ~~G^~`R- Date: October 1, 2008 Date Received Date heard by Commission- Date Reviewed by Seff Snff Reviewer New applicant pYes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates.Apprnved Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council _ CouncilAcrion: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Lacadon: $ase Line _ City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: ~Yy~lly/ f ~~y~1(~~SG ~WIS D epart me nt: CSu Contact: / In n nC~ei Munro (~ Phone: qq ny ? 1 / -IC"1" ~ / / - Z}4 • '~ X ZZ05 E-mai I: ~~ Address:L~ 1Z~Q5 Cu ItUra.~ ltll~i' UrrIVG City: ~GnCho C~~QYYIU~(ja State: ~ zip: ~I~~1 BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: ~1,1~(,~Irl(.(1'1L~ 111C'. Qll ~~ n Date of EvendProgram: ~pi') ~ ~ ~ J Nla~/ Zf ~G i Brief description of event I vlA iYl SI YI'[y' IYi[~7YG Requested Dates of Banner Display From: f I' ~ To: Locati Base Line Archibald Both ~p r. L Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork !~l(tlnSivect 7htutYC Ptrn~anY I~(eScnts f ERDINftN1~ ~TH-C QULL fFprl i 1S - l~c~y Z, zOGI~ FOR. 'i l~l<Et.C ('fi-11. 909- H~ 3 -Z~Z ON Vid if 1Cvur~fiU'ni {~n l(AUhf~l~. ("'Qm I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization co submit this form and serve as the primary contatt. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury eitheF tc~p~'rsons or prop~rty w~nch may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date: O ~ I Z5~08 P79 STAFF USE ONLY Date Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga Department Community Services Deparcment Contact Janelle Hyg_hes Phone: 909-477-2760 extension 2381 E-mail: jhughes ancityofrc.com Address: 9059 San Bernardino Road Ciry: Rancho Cucamonga State: CA Zip: 91730 BANNER INFORMATION EvendProgram: 2009 Wellness Fair Date of EvendProgram: May I. 2009 Brief description of event Wellness Fair -Free Health Checks. RafFle. Entertainment Free Food Requested Dates of Banner Display From: April 27, 2009 To: May I. 2008 Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and arwork Wellness Fair 2009 -Free Food, Entertainment, Free Health Checks, Raffle Central Pazk 11200 Base Line Road I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contatt I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or inju/ry~eith~~r tho ,pe~rso~nps or property w(}hicnh may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature:' A IXXiL.~?,f l l Date: September I8. 2008 Date Received "I / 12`~/G~Y`7 Q Date Reviewed by Staff .g~ I ~~~ l> Staff Reviewer c~~~l~A~-3~-' New applicant #Yes New Banner es #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council _ Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P80 Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga Deparment Community Services Department Contact Janelle Hughes Phone: 909-477-2760 extension 2381 E-mail: 'hi ughes onciryofrc.com Address: 9059 San Bernardino Road Ciry: Rancho Cucamonga State: CA Zip: 91730 BANNER INFORMATION EventlProgram: 2009 Wellness Fair Date of EvendProgram: Mav I. 2009 Brief description of event Wellness Fair -Free Health Checks, RafFle, Entertainment Free Food Requested Dates of Banner Display From: April 27. 2009 To: Mav I. 2008 Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork Wellness Fair 2009 -Free Food, Entertainment, Free Health Checks, Raffle Central Pazk 11200 Base Line Road I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury~~~eit///h~~er to persons or propercy whicnh may be susuined while this banner is posted. Signature:',•~,( .~~~ /~ ~! / Date: September 18. 2008 Date Received `1l 17h/CJ4'~ Dace Reviewed by Suff s~ 18~~ B Staff Reviewer t~~~.lA~9S-L~~ New applicant #Yes New Banner es #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Acvon: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P81 SEI? 29. 2008 1;49PM CUSTOMER SERVICE No. 0761 P. 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION prganization: 1' A C0.iT10iA C ~kt'~ .:t /+~, ' .l)rn r~f. ~'7ic.~Department: b(Tir.t D'~ ~uhlrC ~+fs Contact: ~rl~ ` _ , ~(l'L-~+s Phone:~~ ~ ~~ "~-5c~~ E-mail:Uf t /1 YVI~(' V't,t)GP l~a~ ~ ~-~~ Address: ~O~i'~. ~ ITS~tD~r~ ~~rni~ x(73 City; ~.U-hC~t~ ~'. r^ n...F't^~IL~'~ State: ~ Zip: BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: 1 l~ rTYI Y> ~) Ol ~ ~/Jc[Y'P! Date of EvendProgram: M ~'~~ `~.(~ U Brief description of event: ~rP2_ GJaE"Cf" LlWaf~rIPSC i Requested Dates of Banner Display From: To: Location: Base Line Archibald ~~' Both ` Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork See o-~'~'^c~h~d . . I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree co abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Streec Banner Policy. I Piave been fully authorized by the above organization.to submit this.form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either to pers~ojns or p~ro/Jperty~whi/cJ~h may be sustained while this ban~njer}Isnpostedl. Signature: ` •v / / t.x/l (A-G~. Date: I / oc 9 (U~/ Date Received Date heard by Commission Dale Reviewed by Staff Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No StafF Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Daces Approved If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council _ Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archihald Location: Base Line P82 ~ucamanga valley Environmental Magic Show 11th Annual Water Awareness Day Water Efficient Tools ~~ WD May 9, 2009 • 11:OOa.m~ 2:OOp.m. Community Organizations ~Yaternisnict ~ ~ @ Cucamonga Valley Water District • 987-2591 • www.cwvdwater.com Fun fvr the Whole Family! v w ;, City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organimtion: ~ I'I'li~ ~ ~Gt~111 ~'11~ ~,{d;~.1~ri1 ~rYl~ Department ~.Dl~P.~°.~I~YY~QI"u'F Contact V~I II Wl U,~I~4L~ Phone: x ~'aJ ~ E-mail: /Jf DYII~__ ;.I/,1 •1~0~ l "~ (~ I'11~1 f}I~ 12 C • lA 5 _ Address: I (1 ~Q nn ~~1 V I (1 ~~.f~1~"Q;12.. ~ City: ~A~~~v,o 1'l,l,fi1'~YYI'fNL~I- State: ~~ Zip: ~~~~3C BANNER INFORMATION EvendProgram: I~i/51Y1.~5S ~1~1~,P,IGL?1D>'1 YV2~,4~ Date of Event/Program: ~~ ~ ~ f '" ~ ~+11 Brief description of event F'~ So~ilS D-F Pnl2Tir5 I7(h'1DMIYL~l.Q, e~f11T~J{~I~L+"l ~'K ~`'f' {JGt`3iYLpJ~& i~ U ,~ Requested Dates of Banner Display Prom: I I'~ To: ~~~~ ~- C Y11f11v Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork ~GU1C,ltG (,+u~.r.2mcn~~. l:t~(.GbI~~J 1~5 ~ V~.e 5 S %jG 1I'i'I'' - M I ~rh ~(~8' I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury to perslo/ns or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: ~dYli~ I~ Date: `~~~'~~~~ P84 Dace Received Date heard by Commission Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer _ New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: LtitilS IZIYYIII~/ Piayhc~se Department Csp Contact: ~InnL Ci Mvm.olc Phone: -Idq- I~/ "Z~U~ J(Z~S E-mail: Address:p~~~'~ZJ~OJC ~U(>`1/YQ~ ItYI+eV' UVIVG '1 City: ~1P~1o ~~LGMOYIG4G~ State: Cl~ Zip: q~~~y BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: Date of EventlProgram: ~~ Brief description of event ~1(f`411UU~G 11CUJU/1 IILI~GT UGULS TT ~~,~~~ , Requested Dates of Banner Display From: I To: / - Locatio Base Line Archibald (~ Both I _ I Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork ~ne/ al/eady cx(~~ts and is a~ rho ~~~~ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Sveet Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization co submit this form and serve as the primary conucc I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agenu from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury eictler ~ Aersons or profaercy w~ch may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: ___ ~'l ~~ Date: f0 f Q ~ ~0 ~ Date Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dales Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Locadon: Archibald Locadon: Base Line P85 i ;, City of Rancho Cucamonga P86 Community Services Department ; STREET BANNER APPLICATION. Organization: Contacc~ E-mail: Address: City: Zip: BANNER INF RMAC EventlProgram: h Date of EventlProgram: Brief description of event ~1-~-~-~r1~l~~N 1~'t~'i-~L~/L,GtX~-0i'+~ N~'`~" Requested Dates of Banner Display From: g To: Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary conatt. I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or inju~eitherlto persons or property which may be sustained while this bannC/er is po~syted. Signatur . `"""~ Date: / " ~ d ~ U g Date Received `l 1 1 ~ / L''i~ Date Reviewed by Staff ~ ~ ~ 1 Staff Reviewer ~ ~ ~ r ~ New applicant #Yes New Banner #Yes No Dates Approved Dates Approved c Departpment: ~-4%IIt/I/I Phone: 00 ~ 6 ~S 3 Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Dace heard by Council _ Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line _ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization://// /Y,!//GI70 `'~llCarnorllla-~/,4e.~9/~/7f Department / /'rQP Contatt: fSf~~r,(_/ ~~~C~SGn7 Phone: X ~r~~~ ii., \ ~. E-mail: ~. n ~J /, Address:/~/CK~.Y> Gl//G (_P ~f//~. City: PT G State: ~ Zip: ~~7.~~ BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: Date of EvendP Brief description of event ' Z/ ' 0//D Requested Dates of Banner Display From: t ~u/~P !~ / ToaJG[/,l° ~ a~ Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and amvork ~;anch~ Cucam~n a T~re~~yy~~r2s ~rir~un./ ,~i~~'~~az Shc~ ~'ui1~/ay, Jute ~l ~Gt~9 I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organiution to submit this form and serve az the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agenu from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either fo persons o~ropercy which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Date: 9/~~~ Date Received Date Reviewed b~ Staff Reviewer New applican[ New Banner Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P87 ;, City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: ~~~ 0} ~ _ C. . Department ~S Contact KQTV COX Phone: ~'0~1 - y-(1- 21(p0 X 22.1 3 E-mail: Address: ~ 05C>a ~' i ~! i L' ~li l'~a-eX' ~ t" City:~/lYl('~1C? (_.1~t11t, Y1'l(71~1rC~ State: C~ Zip: ~1~30 BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: f OUrth o~ Date of EvendProgram: SQ~'iA ff Brief description of event Requested Dates of Banner Display r KS ~ ~ P <.i-ea c.L.tl ~L r _ Olo C~4r' To: M - 0'~ Location: Base Line Archibald ('Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork CsJC~b\' I-iTZe.v:~02.k SP~C~CVL.AK ~C,a 5~3-v.~r~c^y, J ~n,ly y ;Zoo °t i ickeks an sale ~ LP.wiS i-a~~~ily ~layhouus_-e ~cx O~~;c~ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by t e rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above orgariizacion to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or inj~ 'her o persons or pr rcy whit y be sustained while this banner is posted. f Signature: Date: ~ 9 ZZ D Date Received ~~ Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes No New Banner #Yes #No Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied P88 Dates Approved Location: Archibald Dates Approved Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organiutio/n: 1~~ ~ ~•~- a Department CS~ Contact KG-E'V l,(lK Phone: ID°~ - y 71 - Z~ ~oO K 22f 3 E-mail: Address: ~~5~ C.lv i L CQ (~}e;' ~~f Ciry: ~.~YIC~'10 l tAC0.Yyi.GY1q[.i State: ~' Zip: ~i~30 BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: C OYl C-P.-+"'F5 ~- I'L OJ I f S I n -//N'~A ~ar ~L Date of EvendProgram: . )tA ~y CO Z~~ `1 '- ¢"J K~ uS ~ ~ Brief description of event Co~nCSt 'f'~S i (1 ~~ ~~ f~, M Requested Da Banner Display From: ~ ~ To: ~~ IC Locatio Base Line Archibald Jvly ,D Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed withou[ proposed text and arwork ~O Lurk I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Polity. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contatt I hereby hold h s t Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or i~ eit to pers ns or p pe which m be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: - Date: ~ 22 v ~' Date Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P89 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: ~/ m(,f'LA ~ Dep`a/rcment ~f1 ~~`~ ~ ~"`~--I'i`~' Contact ~~ Phone: T ~~5 3 E-mail Address: City: State: Zip: BANNER INFORMATION EvendProgram: ~i Date of EvendProgram: Brief description of event: ~''(.~X-C.. V ~l P~-x~C.y-1-e//J~~IG(X,CE}~l/ /.+LJC-~xtiri..4 Requested Dates of Banner Display From: ~ 7 To: ll/..(.~1. 3 Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not 6e processed without proposed text and artwork / `~a`"-~ U ~' "' 0 I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organizadon~xo submit this form and serve as the primary contatt. 1 hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agena from any and all liability for damages or loss or inju either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signatur ~ ~~ ~~ Date: ~ ~ /~ ~/~ Dace Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes New Banner #Yes Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No ~~ }'ti ~t/~~ If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council N Council Action: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P90 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organiution:~/ ~/Un/~I~~ LJC/CQ/l1L~lCLZ /7,KP Department f7.P2 Contact:~~e/%C/ // /iPSDY/ Phone: .1~ ~ ~~~ E-mail: Address: ~l~ (J!//C (Q171Y.t'l.~/K". City: Date heard by Commission BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: ~~ Date of Event/Program: Brief description of ever Requested Dates of Banner Display From:_Y/.a'~/G7 To: 1[J//oyR`9 Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will noc be processed without proposed text and artwork R~9o ~camangz ~i~e l1Reserr~3' ~/.~ (~i2E~r~iar~ l~C~. Qc_~. ~-/d I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contatt I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Date: ~2/l~R~ Date Received ` 1 / ~ Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes New Banner #Yes Dates Approved Dates Approved Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Attion: #Approved #Denied ~_ Zip: ~~~~ Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P91 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: D ~ 1(~(~D l11 (~(~O ,ment: C~ Conncc Phone: ~ ~~l y Z 7 ' 27 ~D C) X `L21 2 E-mail ~n~l• 'Cl')K Cv L~1~1/A1- .l~-,~S Address: I~Sex~ ~jyict~OYI r ~Jr~`rP. City: ~Q~,L]Cd1(21 l~ c~,(1'~~ State: ~ Zip: q I Zr3O BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: Date of EventlP Brief description of event 1 Requested Dates of Banner Display From: ©GT• 12 To: NOV - 2 Location: Base Line rchibaid Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork P92 I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street i Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I ~ , hereby hold less he City of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or'' ji er to persopa-Crprpperty~a itfcfi?nay be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature ~ 1 ~~L~ ~ J . ~ ~"~ Date: IdI ~7 ~ 6 ~T ; Date Received ~ I~ ~ Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer .~ 11~ New applicant #Yes No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Accion: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization: ~~ C~~ O~ Y1Cj1(L~(C1YYlnY~9arcment: CS~ Contacc^ / , Phone: - p X (1 E-mail: ,~ C' Q X ~~'~~~-f'(' ._ lA C Address: In S/~~~ j ~/jL~ h~~ 7 (~ I~f'~ city:~hchp ~'ucan2f~ pi state:~_zip: ql?30 BANNER INFORMATION ~ EvendProgram: ~~~A~Q..Y~~ ~e J-1 VQ ~ C..O 11x1111 U V l ( - Date of EvendProgram: ~~ '~._ Brief description of event: ~O A(1 ~FPC }l V~I~Q1YlUY IVO y . 2 To: Requested Dates of Banner Display From: ~ V 1 ~ Location: Base Line Archibal Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed tex[ and artwork I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless t}~e City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injyr' ~ e tfteF to persons grope which ryay be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date Received r! f ~oqL . Date Reviewed by Staff ! ~ 2 ~ Staff Reviewer ~~~ New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date: 1 ~ ~ ~ Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied~ Location: Archi ald Location: Base Line P93 ;, -City of Rancho Cucamonga " Community Services Deparcment STREET BANNER APP!_ICATION Organizatio'/n: -1Th C.IhI ~(IYIC''1(1 l _u~M(~y 9oarcment: C S D Contact 11 KGI~V COX Phone:~ ~ y 1 ~ - 27(Or~ x 2213 E-mail: K(.l'~l • CA)C ~ ('~I~V t~~F-'("C . 1.1 S Address: ~6 5~ CIVIC ~~(11'l~t C ~'~ V'P City: ~bfff~lL~lACbrytor~aa state: C~} Zip: 9 I ~ ~(~ BANNER INFORMATION EventlProgram: ~~Y1L~01^$ ~e,~~lr~yn Date of EventlProgram: .IJI] V ~ ~L _V~1 ~ Brief description of event ~eSfi VQ Requested Dates of Banner Display From: NnV. 2 To: NOV • l~n Location: ase Lin Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and arwork I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the pules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless he City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agenu from any and all liability for damages or loss or i ury e h~to eerso or pro erty whjrJUnay be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date Received ff Q ~~ Date Reviewed by ta S Staff Reviewer `l New applicant #Yes No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Dates Approved Date: ~~ ~ Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Attion: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P94 _ City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organization-:/ /`Y//~J/D //lllOr~7ln,7~t7~i.42 Department ~I,QP_ Contact:~l~//~/ ~/rJ1ll~0Yl Phone: ~~~~~ E-mail: Address: /OJrOD l;/UiG /P .U/' . Ciry: ~~G State: ~_ Zip: ~/73~ BANNER INFORMATION Event/Program: Date of EvenUProgram: ~ Brief description of event: Requested Dates of Banner Location: Base Line hay From: // _3 To: /~-~~$~0 Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not 6e processed without proposed text and artwork .~. /J/~i.~q a /leul U~IIU~caP~ fzrZ, /D ~ {j,~e ~7urim? I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. 1 have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signatur Date Received Date Reviewed b~y'~Sta}ff~ Staff Reviewer ~ V New applicant #Yes N New Banner #Yes N Dates Approved Dates Approved .Date: ~/~~ Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard 6y Council _ Council Attion: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Location: Base Line P95 put i City of Rancho Cucamonga P96 ~. Community Services Department ' STREET BANNER APP!_ICATION Organization: LCDL ~ • C - Department C~ Contact `_//~__ Anl COX (~ Phone: ~'/O~1 - ~-7 7- Z7(p0 Jc X213 E-mail: F~(~~ - WX ~ C.1~n~1-1'C ~ US Address: I~F~Ci V 1 f l Pt~l-~Pf ~r'. City: ~anchn CI.lCC1PV10Y~4~ State: C~ Zip: 81730 BANNER INFORMATI Event/Program: : Jnnl. Date of EvendProgram: _ Brief description of event ~- Requested Dates of Banner Display From: I ~ 3C C"I To: i Z I y ~ C°1 Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the City of Rancho Cutamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injary ei er o persons or p~epa which y be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature(:/-_~~ (~~ ~~ Date: ~~ Z2 Date Received Date Reviewed by Staff Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes #No New Banner #Yes #No Dates Approved Date heard by Commission Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Dace heard by Council Council Attion: #Approved #Denied Location: Archibald Dates Approved Location: Base Line City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department STREET BANNER APPLICATION Organizati jon~:~ ~ c J,,, ~0 '~~ Department l%C~/AVM Contact I~ti r~~-~'~"`'' Phone: J~ gp5~ E-mail: Address: Ciry: State: Zip: BANNERINFORMA EvendProgram: lMN/w~'v ;Tv r ~ - ~ ~ yr ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~c it, Date of EvendProgram: D ~ ~~ .. Brief description of event Z^-' Requested Dates of Banner Display From: /~.Yl',7 ~ To: ~ y ~ Location: Base Line Archibald Both Use space below or attach copy of banner layout, artwork and text and colors used Applications will not be processed without proposed text and artwork G Q P~-~,~ l~~N,.tti~ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the rules of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Policy. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, iu officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banpner is posted. ~i Signature~~ Date: / / ~ ~~~ o Date Received ~ ~ i /gam Date heard by Commission Date Reviewed by Suf Staff Reviewer New applicant #Yes New Banner #Yes Recommended by Commission: #Yes #No If no, why not recommended Date heard by Council Council Action: #Approved #Denied Dates Approved Location: Archibald Dates Approved Location: Base Line i P97 f I P98 STAFF REPORT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: .Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Tech. ~~ j }- ~, ~~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, LOCATED AT 8770 VINMAR, SUBMITTED BY VICTOR MARTINEZ AND ARACELI MARTINEZ. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, for PMT2008-01332, located at 8770 Vinmar Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS PMT2008-01332, located at 8770 Vinmar Avenue, has applied for a building permit for a single family residence. The developer is required to fulfill certain conditions along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions, the developer is required to have the project annexed into the appropriate landscape maintenance district. The subject property was previously annexed into the lighting maintenance districts. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, r< er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CC:akt Attachment(s) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPT 8139 81 0 0 8734 O 8744 O 8756 0 8766 O 6774 0 ° 8786 8796 0 81 69 81 75 81 85 81 93 8207 0 0 0 0 0 8735 8732 C O 8753 8742 O • 8755 8754 o e 8771 8762 O O 8770 8775 0 0 8776 0 8787 8786 o o 8793 8794 0 0 82 43 82 47 82 51 82 55 82 61 B2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8730 8734 • • 8745 8740 e e 8753 8754 o e 8763 8764 O O 8775 8772 o e 8785 8780 0 0 8795 8790 o • w Q Z_ T I~TIT ~'T~-l ~y II - 8~837- 8~837~8837- 8~837~-~8837~8837- 8~837- 8~837- 8837- 8837 o I p I I o I g i I I p I ~ I I o I q I I~ - 88I37- 88137- 88~37- 88~ 3~7- 88~37- 88~3~ 7- 88~ 37- 88~ 3~7- 88~37- 8837 l~T -ll C oT-l f aT ~ l ~oT~ - 8837- 8837- 8837- 8837- 8837- 6837- 8837- 8837- 8837- 8837 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • elf-T-l IT f~l ICI ~ 8837 8837 ~ 8837 8837 ~ 8837± 8837 ~ 8837 8837 ~ 8837± 8837 o l o l o o l o l o II e l° II ° l o l ~---- ° 88137 c • 8837/88370 8837 - 8837 f--}-~ 7+ 8837 0 8837 8837 ~ 8837-~ e e n 883~7~ 8837I~0 88I37g0 8837 0 8837- 8837 88370 8837 P99 i7 0 8733 e 8745 • 8751 • 8763 • 8775 0 8787 • 8803 • 8791 0 0 8809 8819 0 dD VICINITY MAP (not to scale) P100 RESOLUTION NO. O $" ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR 8770 VINMAR AVENUE (APN: 0207-242-18) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, (referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 1972 Act authorize the annexation of additional teerritory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and P101 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 8770 VINMAR AVENUE P102 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Victor H. Martinez and Araceli Martinez, husband and wife as joint tenants The legal description of the Property is: THE NORTH %2 OF LOT 37 OF EUREKA GARDENS, TRACT NO. 1829 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. AP N: 0207-242-18-0-0000 ALSO KNOWN AS 8770 VINMAR AVENUE The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-~ 8770 VINMAR AVENUE P103 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2008/2009 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. B-1 8770 VINMAR AVENUE P104 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2008/2009) For Project: 8770 VINMAR AVENUE Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L M D # 1 -- -- -- -- 'Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel(s) DU or Acres S 1 S 2 L 1 1 DU 1 1 1 B-2 8770 VINMAR AVENUE P105 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2008/2009 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2008/09. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Land Use Physical Unit Type # of Physical Units Assessment Units Factor # of Assessment Units Rate Per Assessment Unit Revenue Single Parcel 8154 1.0 8154 $92.21 $751,880.34 Family Multi-Family Parcel 7404 0.5 3702 $92.21 $341,361.42 Commercial Parcel 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,093,426.18 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (8770 VINMAR AVENUE) is: 1 SFR x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. _ $92.21 Annual Assessment C-~ 8770 VINMAR AVENUE P106 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR 8770 VINMAR AVENUE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARK A. STEUER, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 5th day of November, 2008, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 5th day of November, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. :" i~~ --f CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA P107 "~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A RANCH 0 C U C A M O N G A P O L I C E Staff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Cusimano, Chief of Police, Rancho Cucamonga Police DATE: November 5, 2008 SUBJECT: ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT APPLIED FOR AND RECEIVED A $2,000.00 GRANT FROM TARGET DEPARTMENT STORES. THE FUNDS SHALL BE UTILIZED TO CONDUCT A MERCHANT AWARENESS COURSE TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN 2009. TAMARA ROUSH, DISTRICT ASSETS PROTECTION TEAM LEAD AND MARTIN INDRAJANA, ASSETS PROTECTION GROUP LEADER WILL BE PRESENTING THE CHECK TO THE CITY. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve the acceptance of a $2,000.00 Grant from Target Department Stores to be utilized to conduct the 2009 Merchant Awareness Course. The funds shall be placed in the Police Departments budget under Object Code 5200 Crime Prevention Materials. Tamara Roush, District Assets Protection Team Lead and Martin Indrajana, Assets Protection Group Leader will be presenting the check to the city. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS In March of 2008, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department applied for a grant through Target Department Stores to create a Merchant Awareness Course. The proposal submitted would be a one day course provided to owners and managers of local businesses educating them on current crime trends that affect their businesses. In August of 2008 the Police Department was advised the grant had been approved and they would be receiving a $2,000.00 award. P108 The Merchant Awareness Course shall be put on by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Departments Crime Prevention Detail. The purpose of the Academy is to educate local businesses on current crime trends to include: identification of counterfeit monies; credit card fraud; theft by credit card; identity theft; booster teams; and other crime prevention measures which will not only help protect their businesses, but also the safety of their employees and customers. The monies would be utilized to secure a site for the class and for materials needed to put on the class. The $2,000.00 shall be placed in the Rancho Cucamonga Police Departments budget under Object Code 5200, Crime Prevention Materials. FISCAL IMPACT None. This action only allows the Police Department to utilize the funds for the Merchant Awareness Course. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council accept the funds from Target Department Stores and the funds be placed in Object Code 5200 of the Police Departments Budget. Respectful) submitted, Do Administrative Lieutenant -2- P109 STAFF REPORT ~ -~- EN GI~EERING DEPA R'C\fENT v ' Date: November 5, 2008 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 2007/2008 AND APPROPRIATION OF $113,285.50 TO ACCOUNT 1116303-5650/1026116-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve by minute action an appropriation of $113,285.50 to account 1116303-5650/1026116-0 for Etiwanda Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements for FY 2007/2008. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Etiwanda Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net Etiwanda Drainage funds received each fiscal year. The remaining funds in the Etiwanda drainage Fund will be utilized for City projects. Annually, at the end of each fiscal year, after the City's financial books are closed, fifty percent (50%) of all Etiwanda Drainage fees collected during the fiscal year are set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement fund." The developers who are required by the City to construct planned drainage facilities necessary for proper drainage of their subdivisions enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City. The planned drainage reimbursement fund is divided between all these developers with the numerator being the original reimbursement sum for the developer and the denominator is the total of the original reimbursement sums for all developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund for said fiscal year. The total amount due to be reimbursed this fiscal year is $113,285.50. Respectfully submitted, .~/f/vim M er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/akt P110 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRdTIVE SERVICES DEPdRTMENT RANCHO Date: November 5, 2008 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Admin. Servic By: George S. Rivera, Human Resources Officer Subject: Resolution to Designate the Deputy City M ager/Administrative Services as the City's Authorized Agent to Execute and File the Medicare Application Form, and Conduct All Matters Relative to the City's Application for Medicare Coverage under Section 218 of the Social Security Act. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution designating the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services as the City's authorized agent to execute all the necessary documents relative to our application for "Medicare Only" coverage, including the execution and filing of Application and Agreement, PERS-MED-32D Form. Background Since early last year, the City has been working with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) to provide Medicare coverage to employees who were hired prior to April 1986 and are not eligible for Medicare. It was originally determined that the City had 26 employees that fit within this category. The process to obtain Medicare coverage through CaIPERS involved several steps, most of which have already been accomplished. The next step of the process requires the City to file an "application and agreement" with the CaIPERS Board to execute a modification of the California State Social Security Agreement to extend "Medicare Only" coverage in conformity with Section 218(n) of the Social Security Act. The attached resolution designates the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services to act as the City's authorized agent to execute all the necessary documents relative to our application for "Medicare Only" coverage for the ten (10) City employees described above, who have already voted to voluntarily begin contributing to Medicare. P111 RESOLUTION NO. 08- z tZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO DESIGNATE THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AS THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED AGENT TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO OUR APPLICATION FOR MEDICARE COVERAGE, INCLUDING THE EXECUTION AND FILING OF "APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT, PERS-MED-32 D FORM". WHEREAS, a division of the California Public Employee's Retirement System with respect to eligible employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as "Pubic Agency", who are members of and in positions covered by said retirement system, has been conducted in accordance with Federal and State Laws and State regulations for the purposes of coverage under the insurance system established by the Federal Social Security Act and a deemed retirement system, hereinafter referred to as Group B of the California Public Employee's Retirement System, has been established thereby as provided in Section 218(d)(6) of the Federal Social Security Act, composed of positions of members of such retirement system who desire coverage under the Health Insurance system established by the Federal Social Security Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to file an application with the State and to enter into an agreement with the State to extend coverage under the said insurance system on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to services performed by individuals as employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as members of a coverage group, as defined in Section 218(d)(4) of the Federal Social Security Act, of the said Group B of the California Public Employee's Retirement System; and WHEREAS, official form "Application and Agreement, PERS-MED-32D" containing the terms and conditions under which the State will effect such inclusion has been examined by this body; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said Application and Agreement on said official form be executed on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and submitted to the State to provide coverage under the California State Social Security Agreement of March 9, 1951, of all services performed by individuals as employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as members of a coverage group (as P112 defined Section 218(d)(4) of the Social Security Act) of said Group B of the California Public Employee's Retirement System, except the following: 1. All services excluded from coverage under the agreement by Section 218 of the Social Security Act; and 2. Services excluded by option of the Applicant as indicated in Resolution No. 07-274 adopted at a meeting of the City Council the 5 day of December. 2007: Effective date of coverage of services under said agreement to be September 1, 2008; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mr. John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Application and Agreement on behalf of and as Authorized Agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to forward same to the State for acceptance and further action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that authority hereafter to act as Authorized Agent, and so to conduct all negotiations, conclude all arrangements, submit all reports, and sign all agreements and instruments which may be necessary to carry out the letter and intent of the aforesaid application and agreement, is vested in the position of Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of November 2008. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Dr. Donald Kurth, M.D., Mayor Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk P113 CERTIFICATION I, (Name) (Title) Of the California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Resolution No. adopted by the of the meeting held on the day of the same appears of record in my office. as (Signature) State of at the regular/special (Title) STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORI:.S SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Dave Blevins, Public Works Services Director By: Ernie Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Maintenance Superintendent Dawn Haddon, C.P.M., CPPO, Purchasing Manager S'" ~t_ ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVE A PURCHASE OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) MOTOROLA RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM MOTOROLA UTILIZING THE LA COUNTY CONTRACT #43070 IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,438.10 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001-5200 (EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT) AND $11,717.62 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001-5604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES). It is recommended that the City Council approve a purchase of twenty-four (24) Motorola radios and accessories from Motorola utilizing the Los Angeles County Contract #43070 in the amount of $57,438.10 to be funded from account number 1712001-5200 (equipment/vehicle replacement) and $11,717.62 from account number 1712001-5604 (capital outlay-vehicles). BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Public Works Maintenance determined that twenty (20) 800 Mhz radios and accessories would be needed to replace units that are failing and can not be repaired; four (4) new 800 Mhz radios and accessories to be purchased and put in the new vehicles. Purchasing's past review has determined that these radios can only be purchased through Motorola. The City has extensive infrastructure and investment with the Motorola 800 MHZ trunking radio system, and only radios manufactured by Motorola will work with this regional system. This model has been determined to meet the needs of the end users and provide consistency for repair, programming, etc. Therefore, staff recommends the purchase of these radios from Motorola. Respectfully Submitted, Dave Blevins t~ Public Works Services Director P114 DB:GG:sm STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ,, Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Dave Blevins, Public Works Services Director By: Ernie Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Maintenance Superintendent Dawn Haddon, C.P.M., CPPO, Purchasing Manager P115 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF SIX (6) FORD ESCAPE XLS HYBRID VEHICLES AS PER REQUEST FOR QUOTE #110022, FROM SUNRISE FORD OF FONTANA IN THE AMOUNT OF $185,005.16 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001-5604 (VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a purchase of six (6) Ford Escape XLS Hybrid vehicles as per Request for Quote #110022, from Sunrise Ford of Fontana in the amount of $185,005.16 to be funded from account number 1712001-5604 (Vehicle Replacement Fund). BACKGROUND ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of nine (9) new and replacement vehicles in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 budget. Specifications were provided to Purchasing by Fleet Maintenance for the vehicles. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Quote, number 110022, and sent it directly to Sunrise Ford with the knowledge that there are six (6) Ford Escape Hybrids currently on the lot. Ford is not accepting any new orders for the 2009 Ford Escape Hybrids at this time. This issue is due to the same material shortage that Ford experienced for 2008 Ford Escape Hybrids. Unfortunately, Ford anticipates this issue to extend throughout the 2009 year with no foreseeable resolution date insight. The City was able to secure the current pricing which appears to be increasing on a weekly basis due in part to the high demand for hybrid vehicles. Therefore, it is in the City's best interest to purchase the above mentioned Ford Escape Hybrids off-the-lot from Sunrise Ford. Respectfully Submitted, Dave Blevins Public Works Services Director STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Beth Hartley, Planning Aide P116 ,{ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2008-00661 - MICHAEL J. VIZIO AND MARGARET A. VIZIO - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Adams House, a historic landmark, located at 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive - APN: 0207-073-09. Related file: Landmark Designation No. 29 per Resolution No. 88-288. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Mills Act Agreement DRC2008-00661 by adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The City Council designated the Adams House as a historic landmark on May 4, 1988. At that time, the owners did not request to implement the Mills Act to reduce their property tax. The current owners, Michael J. and Margaret A. Vizio, are requesting to implement the Mills Act in order that they may benefit from a reduced property tax assessment. On October 8, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the request and unanimously recommended approval of the Mills Act Application. ANALYSIS: The Adams House was built in 1935 by Paul and Margaret Adams. The house was designed by Architect, Saul H. Brown, and is an example of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. The Adams' were active in community affairs and Paul Adams was the manager of the Cucamonga Citrus Association and later the Alta Loma Citrus Association. The Adams' were among the original locals who developed the Red Hill area in the 1930s. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Mills Act Agreement DRC2008-00661. Respectfully submitted, J es R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:BH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated October 8, 2008. Exhibit B - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes dated October 8, 2008. Resolution of Approval for Mills Act Application DRC2008-00661 P117 .~`~ "~ ~~. ~ ~~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C H C A M ON G A Staff Report DATE: October 8, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Beth Hartley, Planning Aide SUBJECT: MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2008-00661 -MICHAEL J. VIZIO AND MARGARET A. VIZIO - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Adams House, a historic landmark, located at 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive - APN: 0207-073-09. Related file: Landmark Designation No. 29 per Resolution No. 88-288. BACKGROUND: A. Historical Significance: The "Adams" home was built in 1935 by Paul and Margaret Adams and designed by Architect, Saul H. Brown. It is a fine example of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture which was popular in California in the 1920s and 1930s. The Adams' were active in community affairs. Paul Adams was the manager of the Cucamonga Citrus Association and later the Alta Lama Citrus Association. The Adams' were among the original locals who began to develop Red Hill in the 1930s as an exclusive neighborhood for well-to-do, established families. B. Site Characteristics: The property sits on a steep slope. Because of its hillside setting, it is somewhat difficult to see from the street but is very visible from the parking lot of the adjacent golf .course. In addition to the house, the site contains a detached 2-car garage, a circular driveway, and thick vegetation consisting of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. The site is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The properties to north and west of the subject site consist of the Red Hill Country Club, and to the south and east is single-family residential development. ANALYSIS A. General:. The house was first surveyed in 1987. The single-story home is a "U"-shaped structure of wood and stucco construction. The design features a central courtyard, red the front and side-gabled roofs, smooth stucco finished walls, exposed eaves, and casement windows with false shutters. Multiple glass panes adorn the wood front door. The courtyard has been finished with red brick and complemented by a tall decorative fence that screens the courtyard from the street. EXHIBIT A Council Report 11/05/08 P118 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00661 -MICHAEL J. VIZIO AND MARGARET A. VIZIO October 8, 2008 Page 2 A detached, front-gabled garage is located at the front of the structure with a circular driveway. This home retains its original construction, with later additions approved by the Historic Preservation Commission to ensure compatibility with the existing historic structure. B. Landmark Desianation: In 1988, the subject site was designated as Landmark Designation No. 29 per Resolution No. 88-288 (Exhibit C). C. Mills .Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The draft agreement was reviewed and is attached for reference (Exhibit E). The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, enabling the property owner to reinvest money saved from the reduced property tax into necessary improvements. The properties that enter into these agreements are inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. Property tax savings to the owner could be significant. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate at the time of the assessment. D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2008-00661 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, • ~~ ~~ James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT: BH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Photographs of the Adams House Exhibit C -Landmark Designation No. 29 per Resolution No. 88-288 Exhibit D -Agreement Schedule Exhibit E -Draft Mills Act Agreement A-2 Red Hill Country Club {d04~TH 7914 ~~' Alta Cuesta EXHIBIT A (October 8, 2008, Staff ' \\ 8m 8 8C ~~ ~ ~ s ~ B ~m ~~m mm Y~\,, ., . v~~hi:..t ~,4 i~^. P119 ~; ;: ,;`_,~,. n ~>. ~. ; ;` p''~~~ ,r~z LOCATION MAP P120 MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2008-00661 ADAMS HOUSE 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE KITCHEN MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH GUEST BEDROOM GUEST BATHROOM GUEST BATHROOM EXHIBIT B (October 8, 2008, Staff Report) PARLOR/DEN LIVING ROOM P121 FRONT OF HOUSE COURTYARD AREA REAR OF HOUSE SHOWING DECKING LANDMARK DESIGNATION NORTH SIDE REAR OF HOUSE PUBLIC NOTICE P122 RESOLUTZON N0, 88-286 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC110 CU CAPDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK N0. 29 TO DESIGNATE THE "ADAMS HOUSE^ LOCATED AT 7914 AL TA CU ES TA DRIVE P.S HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 29 WHEREAS, the Eistoric Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 29 and issued Resolution No. 68-03 recommending to this City Council that said Historic Landmark Designation be approved. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Historic Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. B. T4ie proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned,'important or local personality. C. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. D. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. E. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood community, or city. NOW, TAEREFURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the Historic Landmark Designation No. 29. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1988. AYES: Brown, Buquet, Stout, King NOES: None ABSENT: Wright EXHIBIT C (October 8, 2008, Staff Report) Resolution No. 8,, l8b Page 2 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: ~~~,~ ' ,~ ,: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AIITHELET, CITY CL ERR of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ,.passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of May, 1988. Executed this 5th day of May, 1988 at Rancho Cucamonga, Cal if oznia. P123 Beverly Authelet, City Clerk P124 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA H/BYOB/C PRFSER V~{ TION M[LLS ACT AGREEMEM SUPPLEMEMAL: "Structure/Property Ten-Year Rehabilitation Timeline" (To be completed by the Applicant) ~e~.. .....`Mrt-+~ys.t`~w~. ^;^;`is.. w'. gy:^ra?~y.'+.:~._w4.J r: ~`-,•~ ,<;_:i.; r0..-. ,'".o...~~ ci r..' r~ Q~,~!1:~, Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next ] 0 years. List them in order of owner's priority. YEAR IMPROVEMENT ~~ I Cw wirin i~ lu.~bin 'Yore ori'n hatdt..xa~L ~'Imr . C o¢, LID, Dom, +d z Per=tod w.ou i 7i~ aW = Lib t4 +~le'PC E wfraF "P.6DFODocTw' P.t INTCQ..,oQ., ~ ~-~Y~oR (LrPhtQ- FIPL~c.RC CS I I~Sf l I~E410L~ -Ca QECT e1CCE41o uava ~6 ~ Ll Sc. t DATto 5~a8 tPA-tHT O i G1r~oUG D 't E <<N~FL {{g2~tJ q2~ •^LEMOVE A ~t T gy-TC'1.t0~ FCV' CE "1- E'DL f\G..F l l> ¢Qpt~1'r a "~+Y.7=~L R c..9'n~mrv~ ~ i L i i u o i2r-TarL.to~. f~oeT waocY„rr-r ~ ~eor..r yT~ u + A ~ is F ou "~ ~ ~ RCPLHGE PLF1w~Tl5-~~S IMPPLt)C S~FJNILLE ~J~c.,R 40 Li 'u ~E ' "olti+G. ot--+ SoaT+~- St ~ 'U( YL°PC. LACn-tVbS RCPLK-E K , / QCt JYC/ e(' 2 2 O 7~~IM ~O'f t.IPlir•O(t~ 'rl'e(/ OGQ SGNG~uLa o Pt>?o ~ a' P P ReVAC~ 1?ED 1e oeib"u p~ Y- LIU tvG RAM s,`s t t-+~ocrn +am 23 O S P - C 2.~eT iv NS[4-8~ w~ t-4 a z. L LiFC..~@'t OWNER CERTIFICATION its st~+F1 `""" r~nea~=oan a.[z> 1 !o (~ Pc-PLgcc~ `P_.~Vq,~ c-~cZetLUOY. c.aauG~rr4s a Glom ems , t~ D!}Tto z ec'F'i nc~h f~cgoA.t,~oad- ~,oor5 er~SlnQ(.s) pe+- x~.edt~l e, Lcertify that I am presen y the legal owner of the subject property. Further, I acknowledge the supplemental information on this form will be used as an exhibit attached-tQ the Mills Act Agreement. _ Date: ~ ~!~-08 y~ x u ,~ ~dL , ^ 0 ,~ a L ~~ '7a7 ~ S Z r} ~~ 41 Q ~[ J~~~ 1P 0 `~ ~ 9i y .~r>4 c u ~s r~- ~ ~ ,~..4/-c.~ro Cvc~~ouer9 9/30 * See attached list for Potential Projects for consideration. * All improvement projects must meet City requirements and Secretary of Interior's Rehabilitation Standards. * Improvement Projects will 6e reviewed by Planning Stapto ensure appropriateness. Tlf~ f}$Rms DOUSE ~~Dm,~-ems. De~6~~-Troll ~8-a 9 - ~ ~caoo8-oo~~i A~ c,~~-~~a-o9 EXHIBIT D October 8, 2008, Staff Report) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 8, 2008 Vice Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Vice Chairman Munoz then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Richard Fletcher, Pam Stewart, STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Crosthwaite, Attorney at Law (Richards, Watson, Gershon), Beth Hartley, Planning Aide; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Denise Sink, Office Specialist II; James Troyer, Planning Director f h ! f f ANNOUNCEMENTS None • rt R ~ k APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 3-0-2 (Fletcher and Stewart absent), to approve the minutes of September 24, 2008. k W M ! PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MILLS ACT CONTRACT DRC2008-00661 -MICHAEL AND MARGARET VIZIO - 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE. THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AS A CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM Beth Hartley, Planning Aide, presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Margaret H. Vizio, 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive stated her grandparents built the house in 1935 and it was then owned and occupied by her parents. She said the home is the physical reminder of joy, unity and continuity of family and community. She said she desires to restore the original features lost over the years and to add some modern elements as well. She said she loves to talk about her house. Commissioner Howdyshell remarked that the supplied photographs are great. P125 EXFIIBI~i B Council Report 11/05/08 P126 Vice Chairman Munoz said it is a beautiful home and that he is envious of their efforts in the restoration. He said this was the third home to be built on Redhill and it has a great history that they are carrying forward. He said the Commission appreciates the fact that she is caring for the home. Vice Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing Commissioner Howdyshell said the report is very inclusive and that she learned much about the house and that the fine photographs really tell the story of its condition. She commented that the owner's 10-year plan is ambitious and that the list gives indication of the owners' attachment to the house and to their desire for it to be in the best condition that it can be. Commissioner Wimberly remarked that it is nice to hear the history from the owner personally, the history and the sense of herjoy about the house. That although the property is hard to see from the street, he added that the report had very nice photos. Vice Chairman Munoz said it is a great house and the style and design are exceptional and he could imagine a Hollywood notable such as Spencer Tracy strolling through; it is a great reminder of the 30's and what was commonly built then. He said he appreciates this application and the owner's care. Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Wimberly, to recommend approval of Mills Act Contract DRC2008-00661 and forward the application to the City Council for final action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: FLETCHER, STEWART -carried w + w x w DIRECTOR'S REPORTS B. REQUEST FORAUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE STATE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGNATING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAASA CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT James Troyer, Planning Director, commented that we have come a long way in two years towards our Historic Preservation Program. He noted that Mayuko is our full time historic preservation planner, the Historic Preservation Ordinance is being updated as part of our General Plan Update, and that designation as a Certified Local Government makes it possible for the City to reap great benefits because we would be able to apply for grants and significant technical assistance. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Munoz thanked Mr. Troyerfor championing historic preservation. He noted the new ordinance will be part of the General Plan update. He said the time and place is right for this. He said with our City's development, we have seen some encroachment on historic properties. He said we need to be involved with this organization and to be mindful and protect historic properties. He then opened the floor for public comment. Gwyn Frost remarked that this is an excellent idea and a step forward for historic preservation. Luana Hernandez commented that she is part of a group of owners of historic homes. She said this is great and is pleased the City's effort in preserving the past. HPC Minutes -2- October 8, 2008 P127 John Anicic, President of the Etiwanda Historical Society, stated he is familiar with the Certified Local Government program. He said it is a good program and it provides good perks that you could not get othervvise and puts you in a good light at both State and Federal levels. Vice Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly commented that the City is in the process of updating the Historic Preservation Ordinance in conjunction with this application. He said it will help the City provide incentives to property owners and help them to come forward to preserve their properties and to protect historic properties from being demolished. He said he would like to see a moratorium on such demolitions while we are going through this update process. He said the City recently lost a property to demolition. Commissioner Howdyshell said this is great, that we have an active Historical community, that this designation indicates commitment to the state and our intent to our citizens. She said we will become part of an exclusive group of cities that have this designation and that it will be good for networking on historic preservation concerns. She said she is excited about it. Vice Chairman Munoz concurred with his fellow Commissioners and remarked that it makes applying for grants possible and that it is often "free money". He said he is "all for it". He noted that there is additional training and that it should improve the comments from "the bench" (the Commission) will be better. Mr. Troyer noted that none of the Commissioners indicated objection to the request and that it will be forwarded to the Council. R lekkle PUBLIC COMMENTS John Anicic, President of the Etiwanda Historic Preservation Society, announced he will be writing a new book about Rancho Cucamonga and that it will be unique because the City is unique in that it came about by joining three communities; Cucamonga, Alta Loma and Etiwanda, to form our City. He said he will probably call on staff for assistance. Gwyn Frost, Etiwanda Historic Society, asked to be notified when the Certified Local Government designation goes to the Council. k l4 RR COMMISSION BUSINESS None •RxrrR ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 3-0-2 (Fletcher, Stewart absent), to adjourn. The Historic Preservation Commission adjourned at 7:20 p.m. HPC Minutes -3- October 8, 2008 P128 Respectfully submitted, ~• James R. Troyer, AIC Secretary Approved: October 22, 2008 HPC Minutes -4- October 6, 2008 P129 RESOLUTION NO. D (J -Z ~ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2008-00661, A REQUEST TO IMPLEMENT THE USE OF THE MILLS ACT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAX FOR THE ADAMS HOUSE, A HISTORIC PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE - APN: 0207-073-09. A. Recitals (i) The Mills Act, beginning at Section 50280 of the Govemment Code, authorizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enter into a contract with the owners or the agent of an owner, of any qualified historical property to restrict the use of the property in a manner which the City Council deems reasonable to carry out the purposes of the Mills Act. (ii) Section 50280.1 of the Government Code provides that a qualified historical property includes any privately owned property which is not exempt from property taxation and is listed in the City's official register of historical or architecturally signifcantsites, places, or landmarks. (iii) The property located at 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified by San Bemardino County Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 0207-073-09 and more particularly and legally described in Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property') has been designated as Historic Landmark Designation No. 29 by City Council Resolution, No. 88-288 on May 4, 1988, is listed on the City's current register of approved historic landmarks, and is not exempt from property taxation. The Property therefore meets all the criteria necessary to be deemed a qualified historical property under the Mills Act (iv) The owners of the property are Michael J. and Margaret A. Vizio (the "Owners") (v) The Owners of the Property have applied to the City for a Mills Act contract. (vi) Both the Owners and the City desire to enter into a Mills Act contract to protect and preserve, and when necessary, restore and rehabilitate the Property so that it retains its historical and cultural significance. (vii) The proposed Mills Act contract meets the requirements outlined in Sections 50281 and 50282 of the Government Code. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga does herebyfind, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby approves the Mills Act Contract attached hereto as Attachment "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P130 MILLS ACT RESOLUTION NO. DRC2008-00661 - MICHAEL J. AND MARGARET A. VIZIO November 5, 2008 Page 2 ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, Mayor ATTEST: Kathy Scott, CMC, Acting City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at a regular meeting of the said City Council held on the 5th day of November 2008. Executed this day of 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Kathy Scott, CMC, Acting City Clerk P131 ATTACHMENT "A" Legal Description of Property Subject to Mills Act Contract 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 TRACT NO 2386 LOTS 7 AND 8 AND PTN LOT 1 EX BEG AT SW COR TH N ALG W LI SD LOT 55 FT TH NELY TO PT OF INTERSECTION OF N LI LOT 6 WITH NE LI LOT 1 TH SELY ALG NE LI LOT 1 50 FT TO PT OF INTERSECTION OF N LI LOT 1 TH S ALG E LI LOT 1 TO SE COR TH W ALG S LI LOT 1 TO POB EX MINERAL RIGHTS WOSE ATTACHMENT A Council Report 11/05/08 P132 RECORDING REQUESTED BY and when RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5th day of November, 2008, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City') and Michael J. Vizio and Maroaret A Vizio, (hereinafter referred to as the "Owners"). WITNESSETH: A Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorize cities to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance; (ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property, together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as the Adams House and generally located at the street address 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property"). A legal description of the Historic Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference; (iii) On May 4, 1988, the City Council of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 88-288 thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and, (iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. -1- ATTACHMENT B Council Report 11/05/08 P133 B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on November 5. 2008, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2, below. 2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of non-renewal is mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or City desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice ofnon-renewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the Agreement. Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least 90 days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by City to Owner at least 60 days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest of the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner ofnon-renewal. If either City or Owner serves notice to the other ofnon-renewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards for Historical Prooertv. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions: a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B,"and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement. b. Owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "C." -2- P134 c. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the County Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary to determine Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Provision of Information of Corporation. Owner herebyagrees to furnish City with anyand all information requested by the City which maybe necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that Owner breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. In the event of cancellation, Owner maybe subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. In lieu of andlor in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within 30 days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default maybe commenced within 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default herein under. -3- P135 7. Bindinc Effect of Acreement. The Owner hereby subjects the Historic Propertydescribed in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that Owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner. 8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other address as maybe later specified by the parties hereto. To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Planning Director To Owner: Michael J. Vizio and Margaret A. Vizio 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement stiall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. -4- P136 b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. Owner herebyagrees to and shall defend the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. c. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 10. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. The Owner shall be responsible for any fees required by the County for recording this Agreement. 11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. -5- P137 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. Dated: By: Dated: By: Dated: By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Donald J. Kurth, Mayor Michael J. Vizio, Owner Margaret A. Vizio, Owner -6- P138 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On ,Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared DONALD J. KURTH, personally know to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Kathy Scott Assistant City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga -7- P139 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On the _ day of , 2008, before personally appeared Notary Public, personally known to me or proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and the by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On the _ day of , 2008, before me ,Notary Public, personally appeared ,personally known to me or proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to methat he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and the by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State -8- P140 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Adams House 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 TRACT NO 2386 LOTS 7 AND 8 AND PTN LOT 1 EX BEGAT SW COR TH N ALG W LI SD LOT 55 FT TH NELY TO PT OF INTERSECTION OF N LI LOT 6 WITH NE LI LOT 1 TH SELY ALG NE LI LOT 1 50 FT TO PT OF INTERSECTION OF N LI LOT 1 TH S ALG E LI LOT 1 TO SE COR TH W ALG S LI LOT 1 TO POB EX MINERAL RIGHTS WOSE Exhibit "A" -9- P141 THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence bf the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. 7. The surtace cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction project. 9. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Exhibit "B-1" -10- P142 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: 1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; 3. Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items; 4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas; 5. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location. EXHIBIT "B-2" -11- P143 STRUCTURALIPROPERTY TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION TIMELINE For Adams House 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission's staff. ITEM YEAR TASK 1. 2007 New wiring and plumbing. Restore original hardwood floors and remove and replace interior hardware and lights with period reproductions. Paint interior and exterior. Repair fireplace. 2. 2008 Install period correct exterior awnings. Install screens. Repair patio slab and paint. 3. 2009 Remove paint from original hardware. Remove and replace exterior fence. 4. 2010 Repair and replace garage windows and doors. Add lighting to north exterior. Add wrought iron front gate. 5. 2011 Remove and replace fence on north and back sides. Replace landscape and improve irrigation. 6. 2012 Repair driveway and add lighting to driveway area. Replace fencing on the south side. 7. 2013 Replace ac/heater. Have arborist trim 70 year old trees per schedule. 8. 2014 Improve front parking pad. Replace/repair original parlor and living room windows and doors. 9 2015 Replace carpet in master bedroom and guest bedroom with hardwood. 10. 2016 Replacelrepair exterior walkways and adobe bricks in patio. Refinish hardwood floors per schedule. 11. 2017 Check roof for defects and repaint interior and exterior. EXHIBIT "C" -12- P144 . . STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPBRTT[ENT Date: November 5, 2008 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 17487 AND 17840, LOCATED SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET AND EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY SHEA HOMES, LP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 17487 and 17840 were approved by the City Council on September 20, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 200,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 200,400.00 All required improvements have not yet been completed. The developer, Shea Homes, LP, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV Attachments P145 She~mes Caring since iBSi September 23, 2008 Ms. Trina Valdez Public Services Technician II City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 RE• Request for Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 17487 and 17840 Dear Ms. Valdez: Please accept this letter as our written request to extend the Improvement Agreement on Tract 17487 and 17840. The reason for this request is to allow Shea Homes more time to complete all required improvements under the agreement. Sincerely, ~'~Ln= -- ~ ~ c~c~ ---- ~~Jourdanne Cadavona X951)739-9701 l ~vl r ,,.,~,,,, lt~,,,;~, ,,,,,, ~ml; LOq 1hr.l Ne, n.-. l n,rll.',l l{nwrrr,L~p c' 'lil -i'I O-Oll '/il -i.YJ ~~SN i Tk I t` `~ \\ \/ \/, /~ -I ,I J ~~ ~~, P146 J J Cr UI 'D i J ~ OI d u u° ~F a ~ ~..~ $ ~Q:: ' ~Z 8 g QO ~; ~ 8' Q U I a ~ U ~ v o• of QU c ._,- m ._ p L 1. U mom, d i ~,~vb. ~ U ~, ~.,.. a a .-.: ~ . ~, y N O 6 U O z 5 ,~ y ~ E ~ ~ fi 2 0 m 0 •• ~ ~ /~ r y/1~1 /J~ // m S ~J, 7 r ~ ~ ~~ ''v I~ /1V 17"`1. J~A~ P147 RESOLUTION NO. Q ~~ ~1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 17487 AND 17840 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 5, 2008, by Shea Homes, LP, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located south of Church Street and east of Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 17487 and 17840; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. P148 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERPICES DEPdRTTfENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2003-00199, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SEBASTIAN AND ROCHESTER, SUBMITTED BY YNS ENTERPRISES, NO. 2, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2003-00199, located on the southwest corner of Sebastian and Rochester, submitted by YNS Enterprises, No. 2, LLC BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER YNS Enterprises, No. 2, LLC 3250 Wilshire Boulevard, #2007 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit #CR101969 Respectfully submitted, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV $1,770.00 Attachment P149 Vicinity Map. NTS ~ hu•: tray roe, to r•, :9. v ur :, ~ ~~ nn_i C[ r. y ].!4 .tl L ~ R 9 = a ' T a Ur cnumm10' s r = o ~ _ vq f< J ~ } R ^ A , y ~ v ~ n //a /d : AShfDrD $1 p , d _faonv~k St ' t r ~ ~ n~~rt0~ St z ' Ucrsclt St ~r _` ~ J h --ry - ---`~--- Wcatyptus 0 i a~orna D. T M1 M1 _ Y r;ndir.o-Jd Dr ',7alrihrark Dr c D Uay luck Df n g t g ~ r o' 1r.,. ,m r~~1{ ~ ~~ t tr .r x S ] VILLOIfd 7~ T I ~, S~ Gardens `y' R {FI 511 ~.!1'I.B f b D R e i<N~Vlc~rl'arFzrk~i/='~~~ M1 rl ~i~ n. I _ _ Foothill Dtvtl ' ' Jt ~ DRC2D03 00144 l tUlicnlum Ct ~ t-_ - ~ Sa; llil]f,Nv S G~ wny w ~ _ ``,~' _ .' > fie 03+ ~~ ~ > EYice.uer Aran nOlitr C x )~Iii'y bllQ i I• .i i 1„4 G i• Ain%a C! c )rrmy Ct `~ ~~ ~r art eih $! Roth ester r,' Wyt m Ui~ I ' r Afl4N Rodtr Etiwan da 0 ITEM DRC2003-00199 TITLE Viclnlty Map EXHIBIT "A" Clty of Rancho Cucamonga STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPdR"I'&fENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-01244 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND RED OAK DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RECOMMENDATION Tfie required improvements for DRC2004-01244 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2004-01244, located at the northeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Drive, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 10900 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 732193S $135,100.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 732193S $13,510 00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, ar .Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV P150 Attachment(s) CITY OF' RANC~IO CUCA]VIONGA ITEM: ~i~y[(e'_~®•~ ®~~ ~~i~ TITLE: _~/~G//V//T9~ O~°I /p P151 ENGINEERING DIV1SIOh' P152 RESOLUTION NO. ~$'~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-01244 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2004-01244 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be, filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P153 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP_jRTi`IENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II -~~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2004-00897 (PM 17988), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BOSTON PLACE, SUBMITTED BY JERSEY PARTNERS, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2004-00897 (PM 17988), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard between Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, submitted by Jersey Partners, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Jersey Partners, LLC 8311 Haven Avenue, #200 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Respectfully submitted, uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV #CR101004 $860.00 Attachment P154 Vicinity Map NTS ~, _ _ _ r~omai owa _ _ :c rid' - - ~ ' M1 f l i ly`1 n Y ~ ~ r/ay rv R ~ l M1il~ n„ In C' ~Y `o-/ 1 ~, ~c.~T f/~ Crnc Lrnrcr Clr v L7BOn Q 1 acorr~a Or r e O ~. W ` o Jrlsry tl1.~ Y ~' o rI N < u ~ 'J J r < Empire ~ LaMes -_ COI! ~ COV/SC P ~ ~ The ~ 11 ~ EPrttrl ter ~~ II 7+ r.. /~ r Nei ICS ~n UI :m St C M1, n M1 ~` ~,<1 Arrow Rovl'c /' / Q /!r/ ~~ r j DKCZOC4--UOcsa7 o !`Yr ' I r ^ - _.. ,f lCl"SJP IiJCV~a b idgib r uth St Rochester- 1~,~' o ~® ~ 6th;[ Q - f r • T t C j N 1 F. U ~ ~h 1 'I . ~ ~' r I $.n il3nrn S. i~~ u ~,~ ~1 i II•~• ITEM DRC2004-00897 TITLE Vicmrty Map EXHIBIT "A" City of Rancho Cucamonga STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERPICES DEPARTITTIENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II , RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16226-1 LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES, INC. RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 16226-1 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performahce Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16226-1, located at the northerly terminus of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 2525 Campus Drive, Irvine, CA 92612 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # SU5019878 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # SU5019878-A (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, ack ~ euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV $1,305,700.00 $130,570.00 P155 Attachment(s) P156 h u ., o ~ o W II n .3 n W 0 n ~~ H ~! I z° a ` H C7 z ~z 0 Q~ U> ... ~ Q U v O U~ ~z~ ~~w P157 RESOLUTION NO. O ~~~~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16226-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16226-1 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPA RTRIENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO G'UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16227 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN INDIAN WELLS PLACE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN AT RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 16227 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16227, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard between Indian Wells Place and Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 2525 Campus Dr, Irvine, CA 92612 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 6280443 $1,251,100.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond Respectfully submitted, (Bond No.) #6280443-0001 $125,110.00 (Bond No.) .~+~ uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV P158 Attachment(s) P159 ., o ~ _o W ~ II ~ o> n ~~ H ~~ o w~ z ~' w F Q z ~z 0 .. Q~ U> ~ Q U c~ z 0 ~ U~ ~z P160 RESOLUTION NO. O S"2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16227 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16227 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P161 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SER\`ICES DEP_jRT~IENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II I~ - L RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP 16488, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LAUREL STREET, BETWEEN RED OAK STREET AND ASPEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY OASIS HOMES, INC. It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for Parcel Map 16488, located on the north side of Laurel Street, between Red Oak Street and Aspen Avenue, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Oasis Homes, Inc. 10803 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 212 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Respectfully submitted, M er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV #CR084316 $620.00 Attachment P162 Q ~OOTNILL ~8~V0 z d 51TE 1.AURE 5t y4 ~~ 0 Q ~ ARROW NWY z Q "~ `-' w ,. ~-- > Q ~ Q ~ s 10 FWY VICINITY MAP ~~-- P163 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPdRTn1ENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP 16574, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TEAK WAY AND IRONWOOD STREET, SUBMITTED BY MARTINEZ PROPERTIES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for Parcel Map 16574, located on the southwest corner of Teak Way and Ironwood Street, submitted by Martinez Properties, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Martinez Properties, LLC PO Box 1887 Claremont, CA 91711 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Respectfully submitted, .~ M uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV #CR86365 $2,180.00 Attachment P164 210 FREEWAY 19TH STRE~T VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE BASE LINE- RD. Y ~ h 3 W w m IRONWOOD ST v z ° ~ ~¢" w ~ ~ o _ _ ~ _ PROJECT SITE CHURCH ST FOOTHILL BLVD, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGiNEERiiJG DNiSION NORTH II 1"= ITEM TITLE _ EXHIBIT P165 STAFF REPORT EI~GINEERIIvG SERVICES DEP.iRT1tIEN"I' Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II ~ _ ti RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT LONG MEADOW DRIVE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE FOR TRACT 16372 (TRAFFIC SIGNAL), LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for the Traffic Signal at Long Meadow Drive and Victoria Park Lane for Tract 16372 (Traffic Signal), located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Victoria Arbors, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Victoria Arbors, LLC 255 E. Rincon, Suite 200 Corona. CA 92879 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #08832572-M Respectfully submitted, ^-~„" M r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV $11,500.00 Attachment P166 EXHIBIT "A" scn~ r-wa ...~o: ,. SHARED BONDBJG AREA BETWEEN STANDARD PACo-IC AND GREYSTONE TRACT 16372 PLANNING AREA "A1", "A2" & "B2" SHARED BONDING C\5;526\xtu3fl5\silc pions\16312 sncred bond.dwg 12/0103 P167 STAFF REPORT ~ - I'V GIAEERIV G SLRA~ICL'S DL.P jR"fl~fEN'I ~~ RANCxo Date: November 5, 2008 cUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~ ~~ Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NOS. 104809465 AND 190017193, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,818.55, FOR THE RANCHO CROSSING 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CABLING, CONNECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-017 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond Nos. 104809465 and 190017193, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $77,818.55, for the Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, Contract No. 07-017. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Pouk & Steinle, Inc. 2520 Rubidoux Blvd. P.O. Box 3039 Riverside, CA 92519 Respectfully submitted, M Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:JD:SH/Is Attachment LOCATION CITY QF RANCII® CUCAA~C)N~A P.~NCHO CP.OSS&PIG I2 KV II.FC'FRICAL D:STRIBUTIOPI SYSi'F~ SOUTH SFDS OF FOOTHII.L BLVD ~ASf OF DAY CP.S&~ SLVD tl~~~l~1Fd~ ~_=i~ P169 STAFF REPORT F\G1SF_ERI\G SIR\'ICF_S DEP.j R'I'DIENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engine ~S ~,~1~ ~~ RAt.~cHo ~,;UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 726913P, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $255,000.00, FOR THE ALMOND BOX CULVERT EAST OF HERMOSA, CONTRACT NO. 07-076 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 726913P, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $255,000.00, for the Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa, Contract No. 07-076. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Grand Pacific Contractors Inc. 11405 Geyser Drive Mira Loma, CA 91752 Respectfully submitted, r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:JD:SH/Is Attachment P170 PROJECT LOCATION ALM aD ST u FIILLSIDE IL50 AVE 24TF15T N GA ~ ~ BANYAN T N ~ BANYAN ST ~ J ~ I O~ ¢ o ~ ~ G !~ J ~ ~ °~ a ~~~P r ,... ''-~ VIOTORI PRY. ~ ~ Q . ¢ PSE LINE w z > r O p~~F7URC 5T ER ~ ~ D w z > ~ ~~ a h F TFiI DLVD \ FO TF11LL BLVD - ¢ ~~ Q ; w ~ ^'I CENTER 6 ; ARROW E > w z ~ _ r ¢ > ~ ¢ ~ w BNSF RR ~~ 8Th 5T ¢ _ ~+ > 6TH 5T r Z N u w s s 4Th 5T ONTARIO CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~\ ALMOND BOX CULVERT !N _s VICINITY MAP tvTs P171 STAFF REPORT I_iXG]\EL-RL\G SE-R~'ICES DEP jRT~[ENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer;(~~z"~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer~G ~- II L~~. RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE FISCAL YEAR 07/08 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 08-051 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $753,194.06 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Fiscal Year 07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 08-051, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $688,644.28 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $75,319.41, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $753,194.06. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Fiscal Year 07/08 Local Street Pavement rehabilitation overlay of various streets scope of work consisted of routing and crack sealing, cold planing, removal and replacement of heavy alligatored surface, A.C. overlay, adjust utilities to grade, re-striping and installation of inductive loops. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: City Council's Approval to Advertise Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: $1,193,000.00 11903035650/1022190-0 and 11763035650/1022176-0 $780,000.00 March 19, 2008 March 27 and April 1, 2008 April 8, 2008 P172 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept FY 07/08 Local St. Pavement Rehab. Overlay November 5, 2008 Page 2 Contract Award Date: Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: May 7, 2008 R. J. Noble Company $688,644.28 $68,864.43 $753,194.06 $64,549.78 (9.37)% The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) contract change orders including Contract Change Order No. 2 (Balancing Statement). The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the contract were the result of 897 additional tons of asphalt concrete needed and adjustment to grade of additional various utility valves, boxes and a vault. Respectfully submitted, J uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:RD:SH/Is Attachments P173 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2007/08 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY PROJECT fN N.T.S. n P174 RESOLUTION NO. ~ 8-Z~ g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 07/08 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 08-051 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 07/08 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. OS-051, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P175 STAFF REPORT ~; J~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ''~R-ANC-HBO' C',UCAMONGA Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION DRC2008-00475 -FRESH AND EASY MARKET - A request to issue a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination for a Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 20 License, an Off-Sale General License for a Grocery Store in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue approximately 250 feet north of Town Center Drive - APN: 1077-422-93. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity for Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS: A. Background: The proposed ABC Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine license is for the Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market, which is the major tenant for a neighborhood shopping center approved by the Planning Commission on September 24, 2008, through Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163. Details concerning the operations of the Fresh and Easy tenant are contained in the attached letter dated May 21, 2008, in support of a Type 20 ABC License which is required to be considered by the City Council as part of Public Convenience or Necessity Application DRC2008-00475. Appropriate conditions have been included in Planning Commission Resolution No. 08-48 for the previously approved conditional use permit to incorporate the limitations outlined in the May 21, 2008, letter. Please note that the conditional use permit is for the shopping center and that a grocery store (Fresh and Easy) is allowed by right. B. Requirements from Department of Alcohol Beverage Control: The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population of the census tract (see attached Exhibit A for Census tract and site location information). According to ABC staff, the off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract (0020.06) total 10. This is two over the eight-license limit, which necessitates a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. Additionally, the ABC staff stated that a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency (as governed by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code), because of a moratorium on all new ABC licenses within San Bernardino County. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience or Necessity undefined, so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. P176 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00475 -FRESH AND EASY MARKET November 5, 2008 Page 2 C. Facts to Suooort a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity: Fact: A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business. Fact: The site, located on the east side of Haven Avenue approximately 250 feet north of Town Center Drive, is designated as a major thoroughfare; and the site is suited for this type of neighborhood business. Fact: The census tract, in which the site is located (0020.06), also includes the Terra Vista Town Center, a major shopping area in the City, which has a large number of stores, drug stores, and restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Terra Vista Town Center is physically separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by the major roads Haven Avenue and Church Street, thereby, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license may have on the City's residential neighborhoods. Fact: The site is not close (over 1,000 feet) to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the beer and wine products provided by the market. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Off-Sale General license (Type 20) at the site will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Respectfully submitted, ~~ J es R. Troyer Planning Director JRT:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Census Tract and Site Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Map Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Floor Plan Exhibit E -The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control Application Worksheet Exhibit F -Letter in Support of a Type 20 ABC License dates May 21, 2008 Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2008-00475 -_. ~ _ P177 - I .. _ .r: ,:._ , -.- _ _. -. ,, y' - .e_ . -I - _. ' ~; .. .:.~ _. RO. ~ ~ u1N j _ ' .. ~ -,. BANVaN i . - •. _. --~ I ~ i.i~- ~T.... I j 1 < ~ 1 I ~ I 1 HIQHIANO ~ ~ f AVE.. ~. __. _- < i ~ ~ h . ~ i :. ~ f LL: ~ y4 ; ~j;~i; vKrorsu vuixw _ < ~ ~ < ~ !: . ~~..:. r~ ~ J j IS4 V ~~w y ' ~ ~~ BGSE WNE .Y "~. ~i ~ j . . ~ ~ J ~f a '~ • ' :Y t ' _ t : ~ Y M . ~ _ _ ~v ..: 1 I ! r ~ •y ~ _ ~f -~ Si _ {:K ~ _ _ ~ - c:~ ~ - ... - ~ a . i _ '~~ '_ ~ FppTHIL1BLW ~. . ... ti5.~ .. / I- ! ARROW HWY ' 1 _ ll~ _ b a ' y. - - i ._ `, . _._ JERSEY BLVD :~. i ~ ~ 2 1 I . _ _ __. O _ _ ._ .. _ r ,. .< _ _ __ ye -a. . ~ __. _ 05 ..-- a Z ~ i 1 I S ti uuu-1-- I ~ ~~ ~~ S 8111 ST { .: -.~. -.. ~ 1 t ~L'. I __ DRC2008-00475 FOR PCN ' ~ - '_ -- ' - ~ - (Public Convenience and Neccessity) 'TM ~ sT' ABC File No. 465238 Applicant: Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market 1 0 1 2 Miles CENSUS TRACT 0020 06 . EXHIBIT A 78 DRC2008-00475 FOR PCN (Public Convenience and Neccessity) ABC File No. 465238 Applicant: Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market EXHIBIT B 500 0 500 1000 Feet ~ Subject Location P179 ~J __ TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ---~ _ I --- -- ---- `\ ,~-, ~ ~ 1 lr ~~ 1, ~I - .r-r.. - - -- - .~ ~ _ - - ~ \ i ® , \\ \ \ i ~\ -- ~\ `~ ~~ ~ ~ SHOP'1' \ O \\ ~ `\ 72,600 SF '~~\\ LG ~~\ ___ __._~ e \ \\ 0 0 0 0 ~~ '~ ~~ ~ ~a /~ p 2 NJ~L=JIBES ~]]° ~WF j/~. ~\ ~ /~// ,,~ /~~ j ~% ~%//~~/ ~~\ ._ // MAJOR'A' / / SALES AREA: 19Rm SF _ i // ////// / /// 1. ~ i ~ TOTAL AREA: 1],9995F ~~) WAREHOUSE: 3.]25 SF / / ~~ i HAVEN AVENUE - - - - - ~ ~ EXHIBIT C ~ ~ P180 DRC2008-00475 -FRESH AND EASY MARKET i ~LJ~~+1~ 1111111.L11111 ~J I/ 1 ~ ~ +u~ ~r+uen r.oa ~- / ai m.o- ~ w~ K.i _ _.. L_.. '~` ____ _ RRSiW7E J~ :I :f i -1 I ~~ -®- Y . e n ~~ ® ~ u+w .~ aww~ __ .~ onml r S ~~ ~ ~° / _ ~ ' ~ M ~ . ppa --------J Po a ~ o O 4 0 O n o _ g jam.. i .~. ~ ~ sig.. .~ „a, .~ ill /// 8.3~i / ~IIK ii ll~ ~~K v~:NO a~umus FLOOR PLAN ~. EXHIBIT D ~JjUyN/-04y-2y0~08 10:57 RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 9~1 9~~=~1s~ (~FF'S/~-~L 23958.4 B S: P APPLICATION WORIGSPIBRT PREMISES ADDRESS: LICENSI< TYPE: 1: CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT Jurisdiction unable to provide sfafisfical data. District• Total nu ber of rcporting districts: Total number f offenses: Average number o ffenses per district: ,120% of average numbe f offenses: Total offenses in district; Location. is vVithin a high crime reporting district: YES / NO . 2. CENSUS TRACT /UNDUE CONCENTIL4TION Census Tract:Q~ Population /County Ratio Number of licenses allowed;. Number of existing iicenses: ~ O 951 781 0531 Undue Concentration exist: I'L' S / N0. Letter of public convenience oar necessity required. Governiug Body .A.pplicant. Three time publicafion required YI;S NO. Person Taking Application EXHIBIT E Investigator Supervisor P.ooi~ool P181 TOTAL P.001 P182 Et/ERGREEN ff A: !SLAB CIVFt C!MLM! xnn [ -,.dint: °.'. ium: x bl Vhornrc manna ¢na:. I' r,n: ann ee;nr, . M1 fn; xnx 5:::0 .L'C\\~~~alin•: '••.. i::l!^ 1:: l.ir~li::. ..:li:...•:a r: a(1•. .' Yl:i )ll: fi':, r ri!Y ~.:i :ti:i May 21.30118 Mr. James R. Troyer Planning Director 10500 Civic Canter Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: CUP Application for Haven & Town Center -Fresh & Easy Type 20 License llcat Mr. '!'racer: In support of its apphcadon Fot an Off Sale Gcncral License at the aboyc referenced location, Fresh & Lase Neighborhood Market Inc. submits the following information reguding how its store will not interfere with its neighbors' quiet enjoyment of their property. Telco PLC is a United Kingdom based international supermarket chain. It is the largest British retailer, both by global sales and by domestic marker share, and the fourth largest retailer in the world. Currently,'1'escu operates over 3,700 scores world wide and gross sale of Dyer S71 Billion. :1s of now, Telco operates grocen' stores in'fhe [Jnited Kingdom. Ixcland, China, Czech Republic, Franco, Hungr-, japan, i~talarsia, Poland, Slovakia, South Korea, Thailand, and 'hurkee. presh K Ease will br a responsible retailer of alcoholic beverages. \C-e're put considerable investment into our systems and training to make sure alcohol is Drab- sold m people of an appropriate age. Out selection of alcohol is designed to compliment our range of products -for example, shoppers can pick up a bottle of . chardonnac and chicken lasagna on their way home Crom work. \C%e also do not sell tobacco products in our stores. Moreover, the sale of alcoholic bcycrages is not our priman' purpose. In accordance with our marketing standards anti state law, fresh Ll liasy will adhere to the following retail operating standards: BASIS FOR SUPPORTING OFF-SITE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES AS AN INTERGAL PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT I . The convenience of Fresh & Easv's Neighborhood Market Conce~t• Fresh L4c F:asy's success is largely a result oC building local businesses with local people. Fresh & Base Plans to hire all employees locally offering eompeti[ive pay and great benefits for all employees working over 20 hours per week. The stores reflect the markets and communities they serge and therefore w•e would like to resere-c the right to operate 23hours a day-, but evcnlvherc. the goal is chc same, to bring quality, sere-ice, and choice, at a competitive price, to the heart of local neighborhoods. fresh & I::asy proposes to build a neighborhood grocery market that pr<;yides a large divcrsiR- of food. Ll Fresh & Rase Neighborhood Market is intended to provide a broad array of products for the consumer's convenience. Fresh & l:asv plans w offer an extensive im-enton with the aim of fulfilling their customers' eyen•da~• grocery needs. '1'hcy' wi11 stock a wide r;mge of both fresh and EXHhBIT F P183 EVERGREEN eeAa esaArz o[vewrMCHr 33iU E Cim[IbaLl YJ >uiw :14 ~ Vh P.ii w 950:6. ea? SUri ir.Otr t: 661.503 ~~; 00 1(14 ?i MatYlanai Are emu 301 Gicadae.,C;ab.: .ma 91]06 .. plf 'io i'?C ~ F. tll l,i lL 1.9]1 ambler[ lines InC1UdIDg dale}~, mCat, flesh fLUn and t'CgCCablCti, baked grH)ds and Oth CI g[oe Ci\' items. Fresh & L:asc will invest in modernizing the store and improving the overall image of the building. Although alcoholic beverages are expected to comprise a small percent oC the store shelf-space, it is nevertheless necessary in order to provide Fresh & Lixsy customers with a complc•.tr range of produe[s. '1•hus, alcoholic beverages aze a key clement of the Fresh & Last' Neighborhood h4azket store. B}~ providing a whole host of products, including alcoholic beverages, retdil}-available rn the consumer at this Fresh & Lasy store, the public convenience of the area will certainly br served. ~Y'ithout it, a customer map be obliged to travel to a range of retail oudees in ozder to complete his weekh• shopping. ?. Security and Control Fresh & Easp is wmmitted to taking all feasible steps to address law enforcement concerns about the site In addition, Fresh & F.as}' has an extensive etnplovec-training program and is a responsible retailer of alcoholic beverages. ~'foreover, the sale of alcoholic beverages is not our primar}- purpose. Fresh & Easy facilities aze designed to provide a safe environment for patrons and employes. -1'0 that end, the following desicm elements arc incorporated into our sccurin• plan. Seeurip• measures include: adcyuatc lighting levels bode on the interior and exterior of the store, employee supcn~isiun of the faulitr, and closed circuit video monin)ring svstcm-with cameras located strategicallc throughout the proper[}•. Fresh & F.asy understands the importance of maintaining the appearance of a facility' to both expanding our customer base and preventing criminal activiq•. Fresh & Lasy's store and propern- maintenance program includes timely graffiti and liner removal, repairs to structures and replacement of dead or diseased plant material, signs and curb paining ro encourage parking in desilmated parking spaces and strategic trash receptacle placement. Fresh & F.asP is committed to a neighborhood grocery market that allows for salt family oriented shopping. lhis is achieved b}' placing large windows along the front of the building su that passing motorists and police have a direct. view into the facilin•. Fresh Ll F.as}- will: L. h4ount a video camera inside the promises in such a position as w br visible [o patrons vet - not accessible b}- reach. 2. Post in Lnglish and the. pmdominant language of the. facilin''s dicnrele a notice that California state law prohibits the sate of alcoholic beverages to persons who are under the age oC twenty-one (31) pears and no such sales well be made. 3. Lnsurc that no more th;~~crcent of the square footage of the windows and dear doors i/ ~ ~ar .tat eru..mg or signs or am~ sort, and all advertising and signage shall be placed and 7 matntatned in a manner that ensures that law enforcemem personnel have a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises, induelihg the area in which the cash registers are maintained, from the exterior pubhc sidrw•alk or entrance. 4. post and maintain a professional yualig sign stating"lVo loitering is allowed tin or in front of these premises." i. Post and maintain a professional yualitp sign stating `.No open :dcoholic beverage P184 EVERGREEN teat e3urt oevuorM a«r .390 b Gme!buA as Sulm !10 . Phnvnia A:izu n: &J016 ~ F: fill?.6DF AnOO _ F: 6V].3Ve 9iVC mc? ntan6~d a.~r ti„im?nl . GIrndJ.. Cduurnia 9P4ti . P: NIi.NL.b'3' ~ r: 618.?4V.IB?i containers arc allowed on these premises." G. Equip the parking lot: of [he premises with lighting of sufficient pow•cr to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct: of all persons on or about the parking lot. ;ldditionallp, the position of such hghdng shall not dismrli the normal prie-ace and use oC tine neighboring residences. 7. :1ne graffiti painted or marked upon the premises shall be removed or painted Deer within 12U hours of discoven~ thereof. S. Litter shall be removed daily Ennn the premises, including adjacem public sidewalks and all parking areas under the control of the licensee. 9. :\ll areas under control of flit licensee shall he swept or do-tined, either mechanicalh• or manuallc, on a weekly basis to control debris. 10. if location becomes a high gathering spot, the management shall comply with ant request by the Police llepartment that the Department Cecls necessart•, in order to keep the peace. 1 L :\ll store employees arc trained with the'ITPS (Training for Inten~ention Procedures) liquor awareness training pcognm. 12. All beer is sold in quantities o(six packs or larger. Fresh c'E East' recolmires the seriousness of loitering, delinquency, crime and underage drinking. 'Therefore, Presh & F.asv markets have dccclopcd stringent operational standards and training programs to teach techniques far the lawful selling of alcoholic beverages. Also, l4csh & F.asv requires all employees selling alcoholic beverages xl execute an :\BC "Clerk's affidavit" (ABC-299) which contains a review of :1BC laws. 3. The site will not result in an adverse impact on public health, safety, or welfare Prescndy, the site does not ncgativcly impact public health, safer', or welfare. In fact, by providng news safe and com•enient location to make grocen• purchases, pul?lic health, safcn-, and welfare hate been advarieed by this site. 'I-he addition of selling alcoholic beverages will not change this. But beyond this, it should be noted that Fresh & Easy has a vcn~ extensive training program for its employees to help ensure that it is a responsible retailer of alcoholic beverages. •1'here arc both oral and written aspects to t~resh K F.asy's ¢aining program to ensure that employees understand and implement the procedures unposed by fresh do Easy to comply with :\BC laws and regvla[ians. In short, Fresh & Lasv is committed to protecting the public he;dth, safety, and welfare of the mmmunin~, and will cake appropriate steps to do go. CONCLUSION Fresh & Last' will not interfere with the rrzidents' quiet cnjucment of their property becntse die premises will be improved as necessary For t:he conduct of this tape of business, and will agree to conditions that will ensure that the store is oper•,tted in a manner that prevents an adverse. impact un the neighborhood. Permitting the sale of alcoholic beverages at [his site will `round-out' 14esh & Last's neighborhood market concept, providing customers the added cnnvenicnce to make purdtases of alcoholic beverages along with their weeklr grocer' needs. Fresh & F.asy, be reason of its location, character, manner and method of P185 EVERGRE EN tl~l []l,a![ O!V[l0[MIHf :39G E Cam<Ibac1 kJ. Swim t:4 . Vhomiix, d~ixo na &SOiti ~ f: fir;, qot' snno f. :M' nOx wino l~lG \ Maryland ,1ra. eu!fe l01 Glrnda k, CaLmrnia vi+06 . N, %l a.?xu.x??. F: xv[ ?an iq:. bpenflOn, mCrChan[I15 C, and potClt[lal CI3['n [Cle, Wlll FCrtC LI1C COmmnmtl' OI R:In ChO CllCam Otlga. Based nll the foregoing, Fresh & East Neighborhood Market, inc. respe(~fullt requests tha[ the Cit{• of Rancho Cucamonga grant a finding of Public Need and Convenience for the Fmsh & L•'ast alcoholic beterage license. Vlease send a letter confirming the Cin-'s response to this request n) the following address Sinccccl :: ndrr~~L•tergreen llec'cgInc. Project Manager 2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 410 Phoenix, ;\riwna 8501 G p: 602.808.8000 ~ f: GO^.35-1.2231 direct: G02.3t34.2230 ~ m: G23.i233943 ands. callQ.evergrecndev.com u~iw.eee:greendcv. com Por Fresh & Pasv Neighborhood bfarketlnc. P186 RESOLUTION NO. ~ g' 2 ! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONSIDERATION OF A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2008-00475 FOR A DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) TYPE 20 OFF-SALE GENERAL LICENSE FOR A GROCERY STORE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET NORTH OF TOWN CENTER DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERE OF - APN: 1077-422-93. A. Recitals. a. Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Markets filed an application for Public Convenience or Necessity Determination DRC2008-00475, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). b. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. c. On the 5th day of November 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. d. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on November 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specificallyfinds as follows: a. A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business; and b. The site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 250 feet north of Town.Center Drive, is designated as a major thoroughfare; and is suited for this type of neighborhood business; and c. The census tract, in which the site is located (0020.06), also includes the Terra Vista Town Center, a major shopping area in the City, which has a large number of stores, drug stores, and restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Terra Vista Town Center is physically separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by the major roads Haven Avenue and Church Street, thereby, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license may have on the City's residential neighborhoods; and d. The site is not close (over 1,000 feet) to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches; and P187 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2008-00475 -FRESH AND EASY MARKET November 5, 2008 Page 2 e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the beer and wine products provided by the market; and f. W ith the imposition of a condition recommended by the City and set forth in Section 5 below, the retailer will operate the business in a manner that would not result in a change of use from a market to a liquor store in violation of the City's Development Code. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, and with the condition specified in Section 5 below, this City Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale beer and wine license for Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Markets will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council hereby determines that with the imposition of the condition specified in Section 5 below, the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Markets will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. 'Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves the request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination subject to each and every condition set forth below. Plannino Department 1) This approval is only valid if the City Council approves General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, allowing a change in land use from Office to Neighborhood Commercial use. 2) The area devoted to the display and sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to a maximum 10 percent of floor area. Any increase above and beyond this limit will result in Code Enforcement action and ultimatelyto the revocation of the business license of the store. 3) The use of temporary signs viewable from the exterior including, but not limited to, inflatable objects, banners, paper, or painted window signs advertising alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited. 4) Compliance with all the limitations and requirements outlined in the Applicant's Representative letter (Evergreen Real Estate Development) dated May 21, 2008, as amended and attached hereto as Exhibit A. 5) Compliance with all applicable conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163 as approved by the Planning Commission on September 24, 2008. 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. P188 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: November 5, 2008 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Thomas Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009 DRC2008-00845 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required substantial amendment to the currently approved Consolidated Plan and Action Plan, including the selection of Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funded projects, based on a new grant allocation of $2,133,397. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the staff to submit the federally required substantial amendment to the currently approved Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for their consideration. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Title III of Division B of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (" HERA") (Pub. L. 110-289, approved July 30, 2008) appropriates $3.92 billion for emergency assistance for redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential properties. Grants under HERA are considered Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds and are implemented through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program ("NSP"). NSP funding was determined by a formula that considered statewide factors such as the number of loans that are: 1) in foreclosure, 2) subprime, 3) in default (90 days delinquent), and 4) 60 to 89 days delinquent, and then factored in local criteria such as 1) local foreclosure estimates, and 2) local vacancy rates. Based upon these criteria Rancho Cucamonga will receive a direct allocation of $2,133,397 in NSP funds. Although the NSP funds are considered additional CDBG grant funds, HUD modified or waived the typical application requirements and procedures so that grantees could quickly make the best use of their funding. Applications for use of NSP funds are due to HUD on December 1, 2008; grantees will have 18 months to use funds and four years to expend funds. For example, in early 2009 the City will sign the Grant Agreement providing the City 18 months to use, or obligate, NSP funds. If a home purchased with NSP funds is resold prior to June 30, 2013, the NSP funds will return to the City as program income, are treated as additional CDBG funds, and may be used in accordance with NSP requirements. Funds returned to the City after June 30, 2013, are either returned to the Treasury or may be utilized for additional NSP activities if HUD approves the request to reuse the funds. NSP income eligibility requirements establish that all of the funds appropriated, or otherwise made available, shall be used for individuals and families whose income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income. HUD further addressed income eligibility requirements by providing that P189 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00845 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 5, 2008 Page 2 not less than 25 percent of the funds appropriated, or otherwise made available, shall be used for individuals and families whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the area median income. Based on these income requirements, our entire allocation will be used to benefit those persons at or below 120 percent of the area median income and a minimum $533,350 will be used to benefit those persons at or below 50 percent of the area median income. In the purchase of foreclosed and abandoned homes, the City is encouraged to obtain the maximum reasonable discount from the mortgagee, taking into consideration the likely carrying costs (i.e., taxes, insurance, maintenance, marketing, overhead, and interest) of the mortgagee if the property were not sold. For individual purchase transactions, the purchase discount is to be at least 5 percent below the current market appraised value of the property. For purchase transactions in the aggregate, the average purchase discount shall be either 10 percent, based on a methodology that results in a discount that is equivalent to the total carrying costs that would be incurred by the seller or a 15 percent minimum average discount. NSP funds may be used for a variety of eligible uses, which include: Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes and residential properties, including such mechanisms as soft-seconds, loan loss reserves, and shared-equity loans for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. 2. Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or redevelop such homes and properties. 3. Establishing land banks for homes that have been foreclosed upon. 4. Demolish blighted structures. 5. Redevelop demolished or vacant properties. To implement these NSP eligible uses, the City is proposing the following NSP activities: Housing Acquisition: This activity will provide for the purchase of foreclosed or abandoned homes to be operated by local non-profit housing assistance groups. Available funds will be utilized for the purchase of 2 or more homes, and if funding is available, provide for necessary and appropriate rehabilitation focusing first on habitability and secondly on energy efficiency. The homes will be owned and operated by the local non-profit housing assistance group (i.e., Foothill Family Shelter and House of Ruth) and will house individuals and families whose incomes are at or below 50 percent of the area median income. NSP funds utilized for the purchase of the foreclosed or abandoned home will be recorded as a silent second, which will be returned to the City, with an equity share, when the non-profit group ceases operation or the home is sold. The homes may be located City wide, but locating within the southwest Cucamonga area is encouraged because of the concentration of lower income households. Staff recommends funding this activity $533,350. 2. Down Payment Assistance: This activity will provide down payment assistance for the purchase of foreclosed or abandoned homes. This activity will parallel the existing First Time P190 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00845 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 5, 2008 Page 3 Homebuyer Program currently operated by the Redevelopment Agency ("RDA"), which provides up to $80,000 in down payment assistance in the form of a silent second mortgage to qualifying low- and moderate-income families. The RDA homebuyer program will assist income eligible homebuyers within the RDA project area; the NSP homebuyer program will assist income eligible homebuyers outside the project area. The NSP homebuyer program will provide up to $10,000 for necessary and appropriate rehabilitation, focusing first on habitability and secondly on energy efficiency. Based on available funding, NSP funding will assist in the purchase of approximately 15 foreclosed or abandoned homes. Staff recommends funding this activity $1,386,717. 3. Administration: This activity will provide the administrative capacity to implement the NSP program. The funding of administration activities may not exceed 10 percent of the NSP allocation. Administration activities will include: management of NSP activities, reporting program accomplishments, coordinating rehabilitation activities, and coordinating the purchase and down payment assistance activities. Staff recommends funding this activity $213,330. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: There are no public notice requirements for the City Council to take action on this substantial amendment. Normally, under the CDBG program, the City provides 30 days to solicit public comments and the City Council holds a public hearing prior to submitting the Annual Action Plan to HUD. To expedite the process and to ensure the timely use of NSP grants, while preserving public participation, HUD waived the requirement that we follow our citizen participation plan for this substantial amendment. HUD is shortening the minimum time for citizen comments and requiring the City's substantial amendment criteria to be posted on the City's website as the materials are developed. NSP guidelines establish that the City provides no fewer than 15 days for citizen comment for the initial NSP submission, and to require that, at the time of submission to HUD, that the City post its approved action plan amendment on the City's website. The NSP application materials are due to HUD by December 1, 2008; information regarding the NSP substantial amendment must be posted on the City's website no later than November 15, 2008. The information to be included in the 15-day public review period includes the attachments to this report. Respectfully Submitted, ~ ~~ mes R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director Attachments: Exhibit A - SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance Exhibit B -NSP Substantial Amendment Exhibit C -NSP Certifications P191 APPLICATION FOR OMB Approved No. 3076-0006 version?/D3 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier December 1, 2006 B-OB-MN-06-0517 7. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: 9. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifer Application Pre-application Construction ~ Construction 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Fetleral Identifier Non-Construction !1NomConstruction 6. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name: Organi~tfonal Unlt: Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Department: Planning Department Organizational DUNS: 007062970 Division: Address: Name and telephone number of person to be contacted on matters Street: 10500 Gi i C t i D involving this application (give area code) v en er r ve c Prefix: First Name: Mr, Thomas Clty: Rancho Cucamonga Midtlle Neme County: ~ Last Name Sen Bernardino Grehn CAte: Z9 30 a Suffix: P7 USA try. Email: tom.grshn@cityofrc.us 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (E/N): Phone Number (give area code) Faz Number (give area atle) ~~_LJ~~L'J 3^LJ D^L`J (909)477-2760 (909)477-2847 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (See back of form for Application Types) ntinuation ~ Revision If Revision, enter a ro r~eNet er s In box es PP P O ( ) Q Municipal (See back of form for description of letters.) her (specify) ^ ^ Other (specify) 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT: ~i ~I_Fl1;o I LJ JLJtJ implementation of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2006 TITLE (Name of Program): and administration of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program focusing Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCD Act) on Housing Acquisition and Down Payment Assistance for the 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): acquisition of foreclosed and abandoned homes. City wide 13. PROPOSED PROJECT 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: Start Date: Ending Date: a. Applicant h. Project December 1. 2D08 June 30, 2013 26 6 16. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW~BY STATE EXECUTIVE RDER 12372 PROCESS? a. Federal ~ S 2 133 397 ~ THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE a. Yes ~ , , . AVAILABLE TO THE STATE F~CECUTIVE ORDER 12372 b. Applicant PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON c. State DATE: d. Local ~ h. No. ~ PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E. O. 12372 e. Other I $ ~ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW f. Program Income ~ 77. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? g. 70TAL 2.133,397 ~ 'ml Yes If -Yes- attach an explanation. ~ No ' 7B. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATIONIPREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE TTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED. a. Authorized Re resentative grefx DonaNd me Mitldle Name Last Name Suffiz Kurth Title Mayor Tele hone Number P (give area cotle) (909 477-2700 Signature of Authorized Representative ~ e Date Signed November 5 2006 Standard Form 424 (Rev.9-2003) Prescrlbetl by OMB Circular A-102 EXHIBIT A BUDGET INFORMATION -Non-Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 0348-0044 " ' SECTION A -_BUDGET SUMMARY ' _ _ :, __.. Grant Program Function Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget or Activity a Number b Federal c Non-Federal d Federal e Non-Federal Total ,.I4rw+e ttit uH 14-2-~, $ $ $ 5~i~,~~ $ $ 5~i~i,ziso z.~owlA~ w,ow~-k~sts~ , l4 "21B 1)3~(ot'II'I tt~i0(or11~ 3• ~'clltntvttyt~r~s cnn lA-ZIP 'Ll~i,~iyja 'LI~,~iyj0 a. 5. Totals $ $ $ 211~717r~/~1 $ $'Ltt3~it~ 1~ ' ' .SECTION 8 -BUDGET CATEGORIES 6 Object Class Categories GRANT PROGRAM, FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY Total . (~) (2) I3) t41 IsI a. Personnel $ ,e $ ,®' $ 2t?~I?7~7(7 $ $ 21~ 3~j~ b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel d. Equipment e. Supplies f. Contractual g. Construction h. Other rj~1~,~71r~ It?7rU~t~'I"1 :9' it~t2p,o~"I i. Total Direct Charges (surn of 6a-6h) 5yJ~7~°J~ I t ~ p (~I'I I"1 ~ I ~j19j7rr 0 21 I 'y/~l, Zj~('I j. Indirect Charges k. TOTALS (sum ofGiand6j) $ r7?j?lI?j/~0 $~,~~r111 $ 21~i,~i~ir7 $ $ZI~i~,~iq'i 7. Program Income $ $ $ $ $ Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424A (Rev. 7-97) Previous Edltlon Usa61e Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 ~ .1 N SECTION C'=NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES:!' (a) Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) Slale (d) Other Sources (e) TOTALS 8. $ $ $ $ 9. 10. 11. 12. TOTAL (sum of lines 8-11) $ $ $ $ - SECTION D =FORECASTED CASH.NEEDS ~ ' To[al for ist Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 13. Federal $ 2,I~i~i,~iq'I $ $ $ $ 14. Non-Federal 15. TOTAL (sum oflines 13 and 14f $ 211~J~1~~f~(7 $ $ $ $ `,SECTION E -BUDGET.ESTIMATE§ OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE.OF THE PROJECT ._ ,_ _.. _._ (a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (Years) Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424A (Rev. 7-97) Page 2 ~ W P194 ASSURANCES •NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS OMB Approval No. 0348-0040 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (D348-0040), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and fnancial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of projebt cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. Ad of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discdmination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P. L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Ad of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, (1) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Ad of 1964 (P.L. BB-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§1681- 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Ad of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. B. Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Previous Edition Usable Standard Form 4246 (Rev. 7-97) Authorized for Local Reproduction Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 P195 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C, §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11736; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in Floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93- 205). 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.). 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 17. Will cause to be pedormed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. CERTIFYING OFFICIAL ORGANIZA City of Rancho Cucamonga Mayor TE SUBMITTED November 5, 2008 Stantlartl Form 424B (Rev. 7-97) Back P196 THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT Jurisdiction Web Address: http:/Iwww.ci.rancho-cucamonoa.ca.us/ (URL where NSP Substantial Amendment materials are posted) NSP Contact Person: Thomas Grahn Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive Telephone: (909) 477-2750 Fax: (909) 477-2847 Email: tom.grahn@cityofrc.us A. AREAS OF GREATEST NEED Provide summary needs data identifying the geographic areas of greatest need in the grantee's jurisdiction. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is situated in western San Bernardino County and is located within the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Rancho Cucamonga encompasses an area of approximately 40 square miles, contains 55,103 housing units, and has a population of 172,331 persons (as of January 1, 2008). HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program data (based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data) estimates that there are 37,709 loans with in the City, and that there are 2,373 units in foreclosure (a local foreclosure rate of 6.3 percent). HUD data identifies that between 2004 and 2006 there were a total of 33,927 loans made within the City, with 7,196 (21.2 percent) considered a high cost loan. The distribution of homes in foreclosure occurs citywide. The following table provides a citywide listing of each census tract, the number of households, the number of mortgages, the number of mortgages in foreclosure, and the percentage of mortgages in foreclosure. Areas of the City with the highest need are situated in the southern portion of the City, with the highest concentration occurring in the Southwest Cucamonga area. Census Trail Location # of Households # of Mortgages # in Foreclosure % in Foreclosure 1. 22.03 South of Foothill Boulevartl east of Rochester Avenue 481 13t 12 9.2 2. 13.04 South of B Street, west of Amhlbaltl Avenue 1.604 2,192 179 8.2 3. 21 South of Foothill Boulevard. west of Haven Avenue 8,530 5,113 399 7.8 4. 20.D4 North of Foothlll BculevaM, south of 19 Street, west of Hellman Avenue, east of Carnelian Street 2,683 2.273 149 6.6 5. 20.05 North qt Foothlll Boulevartl, south of 210 Freeway, west of Haven, east of Hellman Avenue 6,995 4,592 296 6.4 fi. 20.07 North of Foothlll, south of 210 Freeway, east of Haven Avenue to easterly Clt bounds lezcludinq Terra Vista 5.661 10,166 628 6.2% 7. 8.12 North of Foothill Boulevard, south of 19 Street, west of Carnelian Street 1,237 957 59 6.2% 8. 20.D6 North of Foothlll Boulevartl, south of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Haven antl west of Rochester Avenue 3.982 3,639 222 6.t 9. 20.09 North of the 210 Freewa ,east of Haven Avenue 4.290 5,274 304 5.8 10. 20.02 North of the 210 Freeway, west of Haven Avenue, east of Be I Street 3,099 2.563 147 5.7 11. 20.03 NoRh of the 210 Freewa ,west of Ber I Street 4,336 2.679 158 5.5°/, B. DISTRIBUTION AND USES OF FUNDS Provide a narrative describing how the distribution and uses of the grantee's NSP funds will meet the requirements of Section 2301(c)(2) of HERA that funds be distributed to the areas of greatest need, including those with the greatest percentage of home foreclosures, with the EX H I B IT B NSP Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 1 P197 highest percentage of homes financed by a subprime mortgage related loan, and identified by the grantee as likely to face a significant rise in the rate of home foreclosures. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will prioritize the use of NSP funds first, to those areas of. the City with the highest concentration of foreclosed and abandoned homes, and second to those low moderate middle-income clientele (LMMC) who meet the income eligibility requirements for assistance. The initially target area for use of NSP funds will be to the southwest Cucamonga area, however, NSP funds may be used by any income eligible clientele on a Citywide basis. Because the Down Payment Assistance program will parallel an existing Redevelopment Agency program those NSP funds will be target foreclosed and abandoned homes located outside the Redevelopment project area. NSP fund will be used for two proposed activities, plus program administrative costs. These programs include: 1) NSP Housing Acquisition -The acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed or abandoned homes to be utilized by local non-profit organizations for housing opportunities for those persons at or below 50 percent of the area median income. The NSP funds will be used in the acquisition of 2 or more homes, provide rehabilitation (depending on availability of funds), and provide the homes in partnership with local non-profit housing assistance groups. Title will be held by the non-profit, with asilent-second for the recapture of NSP funds should the activity cease or the unit be sold. The acquisition of these units will be a minimum of 5 percent below fair market value. 2) NSP Down Payment Assistance -The acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed and abandoned homes to be utilized for those persons at or below 120 percent of the area median income. The City will utilize NSP funds to provide down payment assistance for income eligible clientele with the purchase of approximately 15 homes. Down payment assistance will provide a maximum of $80,000 per unit, and $10,000 for rehabilitation costs. Down payment assistance will be recorded as asilent-second for recapture of NSP funds whenever the unit is resold. All acquisitions will be for a minimum of 5 percent below fair market value. 3) NSP Administration -Administrative activities of the program will not exceed 10 percent of the NSP grant and 10 percent of any program income. C. DEFINITIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS (7) Definition of "blighted strucfure"in context of state or local law. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes the definition of blight contained in California Heath & Safety Code Sections 33030 and 33031 (see page 11). (2) Definition of "affordable rents." Response: HUD's Fair Market Rent schedule for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA will be used to determine fair rents for the Housing Acquisition activity. Income limits for those persons at or below 50 percent of the area median income and at or below 120 percent of the area median income (see page 10). The identified income limits are based on 2008 income limits. These limits will be updated yearly at the release of revised income limits. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 2 P198 (3) Describe how the grantee will ensure continued affordability for NSP assisted housing. Response: The continued affordability of those units acquired through the Housing Acquisition activity will be ensured through the entire period of affordability through monitoring, and following the specific HOME monitoring requirements as defined in 24 CFR Part 92. (4) Describe housing rehabilitation standards that will apply to NSP assisted activities. Response: NSP funds will utilize those standards in place through the City's CDBG funded Home Improvement Program. Rehabilitation improvements will focus on the following improvements with priority to the order given: 1) Habitability -Repair roofs, building code violations, broken windows, termite damage, lead based paint. 2) Energy Efficiency -Repair or replace water heaters, HVAC, and windows. 3) Property Improvement -Exterior painting, irrigation, and water conservation improvements. This listing is not intended to be inclusive and the rehabilitation of foreclosed or abandoned homes may include improvements not listed under each heading. D. LOW INCOME TARGETING Identify the estimated amount of funds appropriated or otherwise made available under the NSP to be used to purchase and redevelop abandoned or foreclosed upon homes or residential properties for housing individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area median income. Note: At least 25 percent of funds must be used for housing individuals and families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area median income. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will make a minimum of $533,350 available to individuals and families whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the area median income, as required by NSP guidelines. These funds are allocated to the Housing Acquisition activity funded through activity 1712. E. AcoursmoNS 8 RELOCATION Indicate whether grantee intends to demolish or convert any low- and moderate-income dwelling units (i.e., = 80 percent of area median income). If so, include: • The number of low- and moderate-income dwelling units-i.e., = 80 percent of area median income-reasonably expected to be demolished or converted as a direct result of NSP-assisted activities. • The number of NSP affordable housing units made available to low- ,moderate-, and middle-income households-i.e., = 120 percent of area median income-reasonably expected to be produced by activity and income level as provided for in DRGR, by each NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 3 P199 NSP activity providing such housing (including a proposed time schedule for commencement and completion). The number of dwelling units reasonably expected to be made available for households whose income does not exceed 50 percent of area median inrnma Response: The City does not anticipate utilizing any NSP funds to demolish any existing foreclosed or abandoned homes. Through the two proposed housing related programs, the City anticipates acquiring 2 homes under the Housing Acquisition program (available to persons whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the area median income) and 15 homes under the Down Payment Assistance program (available to persons whose income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income). F. PUBLIC COMMENT [Provide a summary of public comments received to the proposed NSP Substantial Amendment.] Response: The proposed NSP Substantial Amendment is scheduled for City Council consideration on November 5, 20D8. In accordance with NSP requirements, the draft NSP Substantial Amendment will be posted on the City's website htto://www.ci.rancho- cucamonaa.ca.us/ a minimum of 15 days prior to submittal of the NSP application on December 1, 2008. All comments received during the public review period will be posted at with all other NSP materials. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 4 P200 G. NSP INFORMATION BY ACTIVITY 1) Activitv Name: NSP Housing Acquisition (1712) 2) Activitv Tvpe: NSP Eligible Use -Establish financing mechanism for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes and residential properties; CDBG Eligible Activity - 24 CFR 570.201(a) Acquisition, (b) Disposition, and 570.202 Rehabilitation. 3) National Objective: Beneficiaries of the units acquired through this activity will be restricted to low-, moderate, and middle-income clientele (LMMC) as defined in the NSP notice. All participants will be restricted to the income level below 50 percent of the area median income. 4) Proiected Start Date: 12/01/2008 5) Proiected End Date: 06/30/2013 6) Responsible Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Grahn, (909) 477-2750, tom.grahn@cityofrc.us 7) Location Descriotion: The homes may be located City wide, but locating within the Southwest Cucamonga area is encouraged due to the concentration of lower income households. 8) Activitv Description: This activity is for the acquisition and rehabilitation foreclosed and abandoned homes to be utilized in cooperation with local non-profit housing assistance groups (i.e., House of Ruth, Foothill Family Shelter, etc.). Available funds will be used for the acquisition of a minimum of 2 homes, and provide any necessary rehabilitation (based on the availability of funds). The homes acquired through this activity will provide affordable rental opportunities for individuals and families earning at or below 50 percent of the area median income. Rents charged will not exceed Fair Market Rents, as published by HUD. Household rent cannot exceed 30 percent of the household monthly income. Assistance provided by the program will be recorded as asilent-second, and will last for the duration of home ownership by the non-profit group. Any funds received through program income (acquisition and rehabilitation funds) may be reutilized for the acquisition of additional housing units. Any rehabilitation activities associated with these acquired homes will be coordinated through the City's CDBG funded Home Improvement Program. Once the home is acquired, the City will determine the priority of rehabilitation activity, and coordinate rehabilitation improvements with local contractors. Rehabilitation funds are not distributed to the program recipient, but are instead coordinated through the City program. All of the foreclosed or abandoned homes acquired this activity will be minimum of 5 percent and an average of 15 percent below fair market value. 9) Total Budaet: X533,350.00. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 5 P201 10) Performance Measures: This activity will assist in the purchase of a minimum of 2 homes to be occupied by persons at or below 50 percent of the area median income. NSP Substantial Amendment-Page 6 P202 1} Activitv Name: NSP Down Payment Assistance (1711) 2) Activitv Tvpe: NSP Eligible Use -Establish financing mechanism for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes and residential properties; CDBG Eligible Activity - 24 CFR 570.201(a) Acquisition, (b) Disposition, and 570.2D2 Rehabilitation. 3) National Objective: Beneficiaries of the units acquired through this activity will be restricted to low-, moderate, and middle-income clientele (LMMC) as defined in the NSP notice. All participants will be restricted to the income level below 120 percent of the area median income. 4) Proiected Start Date: 12/01/2008 5) Proiected End Date: 06/3012 0 1 3 6) Responsible Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Grahn, (909) 477-2750, tom.grahn@cityofrc.us 7) Location Description: The homes acquired through this activity may be located City wide, but locating within the Southwest Cucamonga area is encouraged due to the concentration of lower income households. This activity will parallel an existing Down Payment Assistance program operated by the Redevelopment Agency within the Redevelopment project area. Units acquired through the NSP Down Payment Assistance program should be located outside the Redevelopment project area. 8) Activitv Description: This activity is for the acquisition and rehabilitation foreclosed and abandoned homes to be utilized in cooperation with the Redevelopment Agency's Down Payment Assistance program. The tenure of the homes acquired through this activity is homeownership. Available funds will be used for the acquisition of a minimum of 15 homes, and provide any necessary rehabilitation (based on the availability of funds). The homes acquired through this activity will provide affordable rental opportunities for individuals and families earning at or below 120 percent of the area median income. The Down Payment Assistance will be recorded as asilent-second, which will be repaid, along with any associated NSP funded rehabilitation costs, upon the future sale of the home. Any funds received through program income (acquisition and rehabilitation) may be reutilized for the acquisition of additional housing units. Any rehabilitation activities associated with these acquired homes will be coordinated through the City's CDBG funded Home Improvement Program. Once the home is acquired, the City will determine the priority of rehabilitation activity, and coordinate rehabilitation improvements with local contractors. Rehabilitation funds are not distributed to the program recipient, but are instead coordinated through the City program. All of the foreclosed or abandoned homes acquired this activity will be minimum of 5 percent and an average of 15 percent below fair market value. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 7 P203 9) Total Budoet: $1,386,717.00. Providing Dou rehabilitation funds (up to $10,000) for 15 units $36,717 may be utilized on those acquired homes 'n Payment Assistance (up to $80,000) and will amount to $1,350,000. The balance of that require additional rehabilitation. 10) Performance Measures: This activity will assist in the purchase of a minimum of 15 homes to be occupied by persons at or below 120 percent of the area median income. NSP Substantial Amendment-Page B P204 1) Activitv Name: NSP Administration (1710) 2) Activitv Tvpe: CDBG Eligible Activity - 24 CFR 570.206 Program administrative costs. 3) National Objective: Beneficiaries of the units acquired through this activity will be restricted to low-, moderate, and middle-income clientele (LMMC) as defined in the NSP notice. All participants will be restricted to the income level below 120 percent of the area median income. 4) Proiected Start Date: 12/01/2008 5) Proiected End Date: 06/30/2013 6) Responsible Oroanization: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Grahn, (909) 477-2750, tom.grahn@cityofrc.us 7) Location Description: Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. 8) .Activitv Description: Administration of the NSP grant. , 9) Total Budoet: $213,330.00. 10) Performance Measures: Administration of the NSP grant and assistance in the purchase and rehabilitation of a minimum of 17 foreclosed or abandoned homes. The timely submittal of the NSP Substantial Amendment, and the timely reporting of program accomplishments in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR). ASP Substantial Amendment -Page 9 P205 Income Limits: Applicable to the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA 50%Area Median Income Limlt b household) 1 PERSON 2PERSON 3PERSON 4 PERSON 5 PERSON 6PERSON 7PERSON BPERSON $23,300 $26,650 $29.950 $33,300 $35.950 $36,650 $41,300 $43,950 120%Area Median Income Limlt b household 1 PERSON 2 PERSON 3 PERSON 4 PERSON 5 PERSON 6 PERSON 7 PERSON 8 PERSON I $55,950 $63,950 $71,950 $79,900 $66,300 $92,700 $99,100 $105.SOD '. Source: htto://www.huduser.oro/publications/commdevl/nso html, link: Data on the Income Limits applicable to the NSP. Yearly updates to the income limits are provided at: htto://www.huduser.oro/datzsets/il.html. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 10 P206 HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33030 ~ 33031 33030. (a) It is found and declared that there exist in many communities blighted areas that constitute physical and economic liabilities, requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of these communities and of the state. (b) A blighted area is one that contains both of the following: (1) An area that is predominantly urbanized, as that term is defined in Section 33320.1, and is an area in which the combination of conditions set forth in Section 33031 is so prevalent and so substantial that it causes a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical and economic burden on the community that cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. (2) An area that is characterized by one or more conditions set forth in any paragraph of subdivision (a) of Section 33031 and one or more conditions set forth in any paragraph of subdivision (b) of Section 33031. (c) A blighted area that contains the conditions described in subdivision (b) may also be characterized by the existence of inadequate public improvements or inadequate water or sewer utilities. 33031. (a) This subdivision describes physical conditions that cause blight: (1) Buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work. These conditions may be caused by serious building code violations, serious dilapidation and deterioration caused by long-term neglect, construction that is vulnerable to serious damage from seismic or geologic hazards, and faulty or inadequate water or sewer utilities. (2) Conditions that prevent or substantially hinder the viable use or capacity of buildings or lots. These conditions may be caused by buildings of substandard, defective, or obsolete design or construction given the present general plan, zoning, or other development standards. (3) Adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses that prevent the development of those parcels or other portions of the project area. (4) The existence of subdivided lots that are in multiple ownership and whose physical development has been impaired by their irregular shapes and inadequate sizes, given present general plan and zoning standards and present market conditions. (b) This subdivision describes economic conditions that cause blight: (1) Depreciated or stagnant property values. (2) Impaired property values, due in significant part, to hazardous wastes on property where the agency may be eligible to use its authority as specified in Article 12.5 (commencing with Section 33459). (3) Abnormally high business vacancies, abnormally low lease rates, or an abnormally high number of abandoned buildings. (4) A serious lack of necessary commercial facilities that are normally found in neighborhoods, including grocery stores, drug stores, and banks and other lending institutions. (5) Serious residential overcrowding that has resulted in significant public health or safety problems. As used in this paragraph, "overcrowding" means exceeding the standard referenced in Article 5 (commencing with Section 32) of Chapter 1 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. (6) An excess of bars, liquor stores, or adult-oriented businesses that has resulted in significant public health, safety, or welfare problems. (7) A high crime rate that constitutes a serious threat to the public safety and welfare. NSP Substantial Amendment -Page 11 P207 NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT CERTIFICATIONS (1) Affirmatively furthering fair housing. The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means that it will conduct an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard. (2) Anti-lobbying. The jurisdiction will comply with restrictions on lobbying required by 24 CFR part 87, together with disclosure forms, if required by that part. (3) Authority of Jurisdiction. The jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations and other program requirements. (4) Consistency with Plan. The housing activities to be undertaken with NSP funds are consistent with its consolidated plan, which means that NSP funds will be used to meet the congressionally identified needs of abandoned and foreclosed homes in the targeted area set forth in the grantee's substantial amendment. (5) Acquisition and relocation. The jurisdiction will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24, except as those provisions are modified by the Notice for the NSP program published by HUD. (6) Section 3. The jurisdiction will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135. (7) Citizen Participation. The jurisdiction is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of Sections 24 CFR 91.105 or 91.115, as modified by NSP requirements. (8) Following Plan. The jurisdiction is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. (9) Use of funds in 18 months. The jurisdiction will comply with Title III of Division B of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 by using, as defined in the NSP Notice, all of its grant funds within 18 months of receipt of the grant. (10) Use NSP funds <_ 120 of AMI. The jurisdiction will comply with the requirement that all of the NSP funds made available to it will be used with respect to individuals and families whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of area median income. (11) Assessments. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds, by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low- and moderate-income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if NSP funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with NSP funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made ~"~ I ~ I~ A NSP Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 1 P208 against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. In addition, with respect to properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (but-not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than NSP funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks NSP or CDBG funds to cover the assessment. (12) Excessive Force. The jurisdiction certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing: (1) a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and (2) a policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from, a facility or location that is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. (13) Compliance with anti-discrimination laws. The NSP grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. (14) Compliance with lead-based paint procedures. The activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title. (15) Compliance with laws. The jurisdiction will comply with applicable laws. November 5. 2008 Signature/Authorized Official Date Mayor NSP Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 2 P209 STAFF REPORT RANQ--IO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECITON DISTRICT Date: November 5, 2008 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II I ~~.' i .Y . ,~_: ~~ ~-= ~~ m RANCHO C',UCAAfONGA Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (CRE 7, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY-APN 0208-101- 22,23,24825-ANNEXATION NO. 08-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (CRE7, LLC -Annexation No. 08-1) to an existing Community Facilities District and calling a special election. BACKGROUND CRE7, LLC (APN 0208-101-22 ,23, 24 & 25) has submitted a proposal to demolish two (2) commercial buildings and construct a 13,969 sq.ft. commercial/grocery building and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On October 1, 2008, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting a resolution approving a boundary map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24 & 25 into the existing CFD 85-1. This resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on November 5, 2008. P210 Annexation of Territory to an existing CFD 85-1 November 5, 2008 Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: • Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution • Call for a special election to be conducted on November 12, 2008 • Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors ANALYSIS The annexation of APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24 & 25 into CFD 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. CRE7, LLC, property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. The Registrar of Voters has certified there are no registered voters residing within the territory to be annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons, registered to vote within the territory proposed to be annexed to a community facilities district for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within such territory. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the territory proposed to be annexed. CRE7, LLC, the sole owner of the property proposed to be annexed, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the territory to be annexed which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD 85-1. At the special election to be held on November 12, 2008, the landowner will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. A representative for the property owner will be present during the meeting should any questions arise regarding these proceedings. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Re ecttully submitted, Peter M. Br n Fire Chief Attachments P211 EXHIBIT 'A' N1°"r f0' ANNEXATION MAP NO.O 8' ~ OF °°T' °1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 85-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Mvm.TIO AMaAlal Aw awl omaN roA ALL RTAOS At m M mar v RNOD OMINpgA nc AAgTFIIIpI O~IPCf mmcAme M TORIpI'/ AN®m M IIOA! ImFlpl® p~MMY IMIJIp pQaI.T, /s!D N M qMm Q M !m[TARI v M RANpp pA'.111NG RA[ IIIO~IIOM 06010f, CAIipMA TR~Ar ffi. YA MIRgK WL pO~ lAlp NMeeR • l:AfNM LAID NMim AAllpp RKJYOIOA Ie[ 1110ImbM C61MC1 va vAnNleort uro iIAR v Wawa esYY,u m eM~ o~+s I Mover m1m tMAr M Rya NM sMOO1o woxo v Rplmel Ns® ly m s Arnap m mAwrn rAmlm oplpct Mn as v M AAMpq Yy- CpIGMe0M0A TR e110R.901 0MIM0f, aaam a eAM ENwp WAR 6 ' L r `~ OsiM.T Al IENAM 1QfO llp0~ MDO~M ~ M1 v~b, a a Qn • ..`~'.~ • r'OO"v ra wmr1OAr°1"°r~w o omsr w c~`-e Av1b1in wo °awnAU°°n[ MODL4 WIO 1bT-u PIIOIECIOI OOIIN.'1, OOYf1Y v to eO1M4A1 RAR Q CAVOMA M1111 ~N ~ Ism OM AT Mla ~ O IIII! O A1a9OR Alp ~~pG FV11 ~ 0 yyl rglAeyp Nw M ~rIQ > M 001/111 SOtTAR/ AAAMRpq GIGNA~MIG NI[ N01IRIp1 080001 ~-~ _ ~o1'w1twM1OC OpD u _ _ _ I AI i --- J --I I ,, . ~ ~~. ~,~ ~$ Y M1 s' ~ ~ rrx i I -- ---~ I s~ - -- y~,~~ am,< TApll ~ a QAI~E lFIiQM RApV9 pELTA n {~ CA YYY' p ~ cs ce I1 4~ t- - --4- -1nN- L1 , GRAPHIC SCALE ea' o' eo• ¢w' scar: f • eo• BAM OOII/Tr fF.CGi~6TG GSIIpfJIIF Tb YII MAS AFa flID Upa 00eLEMf MABEII AMe _ oAr v _ up_ AT _IL N NzA v MArs v Assti~pn Aip toeurtY rAn11n uMOeelf AT AAT AT M AmlQf v N M AYOIMT K ~~ IMII WIZII AAaml/melxwtn-aaamu moor v !AM RMIA/pp lfAR 6 MURMA BT OePVIr Iac0lpm ei' ... _, i '~'>~~ I I II II i I- .~ I_ ~ I n ry I I d~ I ~. _ I ~ I I rqr _~ ~.. . - I M1ry S' r°~ ~OG7ML l ~m P212 RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-'O 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 08-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1 ), CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (the "Board of Directors") of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized bylaw. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot P213 Resolution No. FD 08- Page -2- arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation Area to the District; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public facilities and services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annexation No. 08-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The servicesthatareauthorizedtobefinancedfrom the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. P214 Resolution No. FD 08- Page -3- The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Revised Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special taz shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 12th day of November 2008, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax maybe levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annexation No. 08-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") P215 Resolution No. FD 08- Page -4- pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Ordinance No. FD 47 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. Receive the returns of the election. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. P216 Resolution No. FD O8- Page -5- PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Kathryn L. Scott, Acting City Clerk day of 2008. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President I, KATHRYN L. SCOTT, ACTING CITY CLERK of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certifythat the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2008. Executed this day of 2008 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P217 Resolution No. FD 08- Page -6- EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 08-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 08-1 for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 shall be: Structures Residential 1 DU Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 3 DU: 2.25 4 DU: 2.65 5-14 DU: 2.65 15-30 DU: 6.15 31-80 DU: 10.65 81 - up DU: 23.15 Commercial .($148.04) per acre + $.080 per SF Industrial ($148.04) per acre + $.098 per SF Note: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot _ ($148.04) _ ($148.04) _ ($148.04) _ ($148.04) _ ($148.04) + {.35 (TU-4) ($148.04)} =($148.04)+{.30(TU-14) ($148.04)} _ ($148.04) + {.25 (TU-30) ($148.04)} _ ($148.04) + {.20 (TU-80) ($148.04)} ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT Maximum Annual Special Tax The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2008 and each July 1 s' thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. P218 Resolution No. FD 08- Page -7- REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installatidn of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not dwned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. P219 STAFF REPORT CITI' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO Date: November 5, 2008 G'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CSCDA) FOR THE BENEFIT OF MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. THIS ITEM APPEARED ON THE CITY COUNCIL'S OCTOBER 15, 2008 AGENDA AS AN ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING. SUBSEQUENT TO THE MEETING, THE INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN CONTACTED THE CITY AND EXPLAINED THAT AN ERROR OCCURRED IN THEIR PUBLISHING OF THE PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THIS MATTER. DUE TO THE ERROR BY THE NEWSPAPER IN PUBLISHING THE NOTICE, THIS PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED TO TAKE PLACE AGAIN IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW. STAFF HAS VERIFIED THAT THE INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN PUBLISHED THE NOTICE FOR THIS MATTER IN THE NEWSPAPER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2008 WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIRED 14 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that following the public hearing the City Council adopt the attached Resolution to approve the CSCDA's issuance of Non Profit Health Care Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $55,000,000 for the benefit of Mountain Shadows Support Group, Inc. BACKGROUND: Established on July 1, 1988, Mountain Shadows Support Group ("MSSG") works to promote the welfare of developmentally disabled infants, children, adolescent, and adult residents by assisting their physical, social, educational, occupational, and vocational development. MSSG currently operates 18 community homes for 11.7 residents through the Mountain Shadows Community Homes program. An additional 13 homes are operated through the Mountain Shadows Special Kids Homes program, providing services to another 78 residents. The 31 facilities are located in the communities of San Marcos and Escondido in San Diego County, and in Moreno Valley and the unincorporated area of Riverside County. In addition to the residential care facilities, MSSG operates an adult day program providing services to more than 50 persons with developmental disabilities and operates the MSSG Transportation program to supply transportation to their residents and others with disabilities in north San Diego County. ANALYSIS: In June 2008, MSSG, a California 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation, applied to CSCDA for financing of a proposed project involving the acquisition of 18 residential facilities and 1 commercial facility. The properties are located and currently operating in San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties. Five of the 18 residential facilities and the Adult Day Program center are located in Rancho Cucamonga. The remaining 13 residential facilities are located in the cities of Rialto, San Bernardino, Redlands, Loma Linda and La Verne. The subject properties are each "home" to no more than 6 developmentally disabled residents and all of the properties have been modified to P220 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOULTION FOR THE ISSUEANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH PAGE 2 CARE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. NOVEnfar:R 5, ?008 accommodate wheelchair accessibility. Although 24 hour supervision is provided, none of the staff reside in the homes. The facility locations in Rancho Cucamonga are described as follows: • 8271 Onyx Court (Logan House) • 5612 Dresden Street (Kingston House) • 6979 Mesada Street (Kenyon House) • 7817 Sauterne Drive (Norwood House) • 7380 Cartilla Ave (Monterey House) • 7945 Cartilla Avenue -Commercial facility that operates the Crossroads Day Program and Corporate Offices. The current operator and owner of the six facilities in Rancho Cucamonga (5 residential sites and adult day program site) is Horrigan Enterprises, Inc.("HEI"). HEI has been operating their community based homes between 17 and 20 years depending on the location and have always been providing services to the developmentally disabled. The adult day program site has been providing services to the developmentally disabled for 7 years. Exhibit 1 indicates the location of the sites proposed to be acquired by Mountain Shadows. Exhibit 2 identifies all known residentia group care facilities, as well as commercial facilities that are licensed in the City. In order to complete the acquisition of the facilities in Rancho Cucamonga, Mountain Shadows proposes the use tax exempt bonds, commonly referred to as conduit financing. The issuer of the bonds will be the CSCDA, the City is not be the issuer. The CSCDA's mission is to provide local governments and private entities access to low-cost, tax-exempt financing for projects that provide a tangible public benefit, contribute to social and economic growth and improve the overall quality of life in local communities throughout California. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the CSCDA joint powers authority and the City has utilized CSCDA's services in the past. Federal tax law requires that prior to tax-exempt bonds being issued by CSCDA the city or the county with jurisdiction must hold a public hearing following reasonable public notice pursuant to Section 147(f), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Adoption of the Resolution approving the issuance by CSCDA of its Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $55,000,000 is necessary to proceed with the proposed financing. FINANCIAL AND FACILITY USE RESTRICTIONS: The bonds that are issued, and the requirement to pay the debt service on the bonds, are the obligation of MSSG. The debt service on the bonds will be paid through resources of MSSG that are generated from the operations of the facilities which the bond supports. The City is not financially responsible for any aspect of the proposed bond financing. In addition, at the September 16, 2008 City Council workshop, the Council directed staff to also include a provision in the Resolution that required the use of the properties be limited to licensed health care facilities only for residents with developmental disabilities throughout the term of the bonds. P221 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOULTION FOR THE ISSUEANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH PAGE 3 CARE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. NOVP:ibfBER 5, 2008 Although the CSCDA will be the issuer of the tax-exempt obligations for Mountain Shadows, the financing of facilities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot proceed without the approval of the City Council. Therefore, Mountain Shadows is requesting the City Council consider their proposal for using tax exempt bonds to finance the acquisition of the 6 facilities in the City and to hold the required public hearing. Respectfully submitted, oDa~ Lind Daniels Redevelopment Director Attachments: Exhibit 1 -Location of properties to be acquired Exhibit 2 -Location of Group Care Facilities P222 RESOLUTION NO. 08-221 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF NON PROFIT HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION OF LICENSED HEALTH CARE FACILITIES BY MOUNTAIN SHADOWS SUPPORT GROUP, INC ' WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority") is authorized by the laws of the State of California (the "Law") to execute and deliver health care revenue obligations for the purpose of financing the acquisition of health care facilities located within the area of operation of the Authority; and WHEREAS, Mountain Shadows Support Group, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Borrower") has requested the Authority to issue and deliver health care revenue bonds in the anticipated principal amount of approximately $55,000,000 (the "Obligations"), a potion of the proceeds of which shall be used for the purpose of financing the acquisition of licensed health care facilities commonly known as Logan House located at 8271 Onyx Court, Kingston House located at 5612 Dresden Street, Monterey House located at 7380 Cartilla Avenue, Kenyon House located at 6979 Mesada Street, and Norwood House located at 7817 Sauterne Drive, and the Crossroads Day Program and Corporate Offices located at 7945 located at Cartilla Avenue, each in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (collectively, the "Project".); and WHEREAS, the Obligations to be issued and delivered to finance the acquisition of the Project will be considered "qualified 501 (c)(3) bonds" under Section 145 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and Section 147(f) of the Code requires that the "applicable elected representative" with respect to the Project hold a public hearing on the issuance and delivery of the Obligations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as the "applicable elected representatives" to hold said public hearing, has held said public hearing at which all those interest in speaking with respect to the financing of the Project were heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby approves the financing of the Project by the Authority with the proceeds of the Obligations. 3. The issuance and delivery of the Obligations shall be subject to the approval of and execution by the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party and subject to the sale of the Obligations by the Authority. P223 Resolution No. 08-221 Cross Reference OB-209 Page 2 of 5 4. The approval of the financing of the Project by the Authority with the proceeds of the Obligations set forth herein shall be subject to (i) the application of a portion of the proceeds of the Obligations to the financing of the acquisition of the Project which shall be used as licensed health care facilities for the benefit of developmentally disabled individuals and (ii) throughout the term of the Obligations the Project will be used for such purpose. 5. The City Clerk of the City shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution and a copy of the affidavit of publication of the public hearing notice to: Thomas A. Downey Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation 650 California Street, 18`" Floor San Francisco, California 94108 6. The adoption of this Resolution is solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall not be construed in any other manner, with neither the City nor its staff having fully reviewed or considered the financial feasibility of the Project or the expected operation of the Project with regards to any State of California statutory requirements, and such adoption shall not obligate, without further formal action to be taken by this City Council, including, but not limited to, the approval of the financing documents by the City Council by resolution, (i) the City to provide financing to the Borrower for the acquisition of the Project or to issue the Obligations for purposes of such financing; or (ii) the City, or any department of the City, to approve any application or request for, or take any other action in connection with, any environmental, General Plan, zoning or any other permit or other action necessary for the acquisition or operation of the Project. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. Please see the following page for /orma/ adoptlon, cerWicafion and signatures P224 Resolution No. 08-221 Page 3 of 5 Cross Reference 08-209 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5"'day of November 2008. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn L. Scott, CMC, Acting City Clerk I, KATHRYN L. SCOTT, ACTING CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day of November 2008. Executed this 6th day of November 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Kathryn L. Scott, CMC, Acting City Clerk t Mouwta~ ]jA~C110 rn ~;IfCAAIOSf,A n Kingston House (17 years +) 5612 Dresden Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 c E x ~r~ows c~~ou.p c:r~~e a r.~-~----~ ~Xl~ i,b ~t ~ ,.,., Av Banyan Kenyon House(17 years +) 6979 Mesada Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SR-210 19th S Monterey House(20 years +) 7380 Cartilla Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Base Norwood House (17 years +) 7817 Sauterne Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 m `m I w Base Line Rtl Crossroads Day Program (24,000 sf. commercial bldg - 7yrs.) 7945 Cartilla Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Fwihill BI Rt Blh N W~E S Logan House (19 years +) r 8271 Onyx Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 w Legend ~ exisriwg Fac0.ities to be aeo~uCyed am sr a' a_ m ¢ m i0 ,`B ~ `w v in c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 w evcated ey: ecty a{rza~+cho cucavuoi+ga -1 0 0.5 1 2 crs r,wts(ow, scytio, sooa n Miles ~ L' P22 6 w ~, Z (p -a a' o `~ ~ ~ Off a o ], v h o s~ ~ w 3 U ~ ¢ s ~ i ~ J J ~ d ; u a ~ y N N y o_ i V. y] h a Q. " 'a ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ C7 O u ~ v ~ ~ m 3 ~ U _ _ ~ N N m W W l~ K ~ J [~ n _ m O m m LL K ~ N ntl Ise3 ntl ep uem{33 n epuem!l3 ~ ~ _, ~ ~ ' \ V K v /'~J ntl ~alsalpoa M SL-I ` b ~ ntl isa4ooaN ~ ~ ~ 9 ~~ uaH!II!W S w ~ 0 tl uaneHO ~ ~ n esouuaH O esouuaH ' n ~ nV Ple o d PIe9!4oN ~ ~ 0 J ntl uewllaH _v uewllaH ^ ~ v R ntl ye aur 3S ue!lawe~ w c J RI S' ntl anoi~ ( /~ ~ t O m / Q D) 0 LL Q y/ L C /\ , < ~ ~ C L`''j ` °- m ~ STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Donald Granger, Associate Planner P227 RANCHO IcUCAMONGA Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.4 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street. At the time the Planning Commission approved DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I (a 9.8-acre parcel), with only Phase II (a 3.6-acre parcel) being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Over the past couple of months, Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a Conditional Use Permit application that will complete Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of the master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. Phase II of the master-planned project is located in the Open Space District, which does not permit recreational and boat storage and self-storage facilities. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously voted (Waverly absent) to initiate Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-51 recommending approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. At the same meeting, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-50 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 for Phase II of the master-planned project contingent upon City Council approval of this Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment (Refer to the attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 24, 2008, for additional information). The proposed text amendment would specifically amend the text of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in Part II of Chapter 5, 5.24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, .304 Conditional Uses, to include the following use, subject to a Conditional Use Permit: "Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage and Self-Storage Facilities, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange." P228 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 - CHARLES .IOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 2 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 20, 2008,. at Etiwanda Gardens located at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue. The applicant's consultant, Charles Joseph Associates, was available to answer questions. One resident attended the meeting and inquired about the noise levels the project would generate. Mr. Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates explained that the noise levels from the storage facility would be less than that of the I-15 Freeway, and that the noise levels would also be mitigated by the storage building walls. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Cultural Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site to properties to the north, south, east, and west. CONCLUSION: Staff finds the proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment to be appropriate and an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will conditionally permit the completion of the master-planned project in a location that is very suitable for this type of use, and preclude development of recreational vehicle storage facilities and self-storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites. The proposed text change will encourage orderly development of the site, which will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and built environment. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 24, 2008, and recommended that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Respectfully submitted, %r Ja s R. Troyer, AICP 0 Planning Director JRT:DG/ma Attachmehts: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 12, 2008 (with Exhibits) Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes dated March 12, 2008 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 24, 2008 (with Exhibits) Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes dated September 24, 2008 Exhibit E - Initial Study Parts I and II Exhibit F -Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 dated September 24, 2008 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 P229 `~_ .T ~ I, `. ~r 1 ' ~? ,~,: ~ 7 z T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMO~N'GA Staff Report DATE: March 12, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048. BACKGROUND: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.47 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street (Exhibit E). At the time the Planning Commission approved DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I, with only Phase II being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Phase I is approximately 9.87 acres in size. The staff report containing the language stating that Phase II would require a separate Conditional Use Permit application and consideration is attached (Exhibit B). In conjunction with DRC2003-00048, a text amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan (DRC2003-00047) was also approved that included a resolution recommending approval of recreational vehicle and boat storage facilities within the Low Residential District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, if a site was not adjacent to single-family or multiple-family residences, and if the site was adjacent to both the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The text amendment was subsequently approved by the City Council on May 19, 2004. Over the past couple of months, Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a Conditional Use Permit application that will complete Phase II of the master plan (Exhibit E), the undeveloped 3.6 acre parcel. ANALYSIS: Since the Planning Commission approval of DRC2003-00048 was limited to approval of Phase I, the applicant is proposing to submit a new Conditional Use Permit request to develop Phase II. However, before Phase II can proceed, it is necessary to determine the EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 2 most appropriate means for entitling the project given the existing land use designation and previous Planning Commission direction related to the project. At the time of approval of Phase I, the parcel was located in the Low Residential District, and Phase II was located in the Open Space District. As discussed above, the text amendment that was approved in 2004 is only applicable to the Low Residential District. Thus, there are two options that could be initiated that would appropriately entitle Phase II of the master plan under the present land use designation of Open Space. The two options are as follows: Option 1 -General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Amendments: The applicant could propose a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and an Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment (ESPA) to amend the land use designation from Open Space to Low Residential, in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application. With this option comes the possibility that should the land use change be completed and the recreational storage facility not be constructed, the 3.6-acre parcel will remain residentially. zoned. Given the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, Planning Department staff would not support a residential land use designation at this location. Accordingly, staff sees this option as being problematic. Option 2 -Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment: The second option is to process an Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) Text Amendment to allow recreational and boat storage subject,to a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District. Under this scenario, if the project is not constructed, the land use will remain Open Space and the possibility of residential development is precluded. Staff would also recommend including a footnote to the final draft of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment that would read as follows: Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage is a Conditionally Permitted Use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. The addition of the footnote would preclude development of recreational storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites for recreational storage facilities. With the text amendment and corresponding footnote, both the logical completion of the project would be permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and the potential residential development scenario that could result from a GPA and ESPA would be avoided. Of the two options, staff believes that Option 2 is the better choice since in the long term it will prevent a residential land use designation in a location that is not otherwise suitable for residential development given its immediate proximity to both freeways. Should the Planning Commission direct staff to initiate Option 2, the project will require the review and approval of the ESP Text Amendment by the Planning Commission with final consideration and action by the City Council. Initiating the Specific Plan Text Amendment would allow staff to begin a thorough analysis and notify property owners of a public hearing to consider the amendment. Public hearings at both the Planning Commission and City Council will be required. Initiation does not presuppose an approval action. P230 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the proposed request, and through minute action, direct staff to initiate Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 as outlined in Option 2. Respectfully submitted, Ja ~ R. Troyer, AICP ~ ~~~ Planning Director JT:DG\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Letter of Request from Applicant dated November 14, 2007 Exhibit B -Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 2004, without Attachments Exhibit C -Section 5.24.300 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Exhibit D -Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map Exhibit E -Site Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Exhibit F -Landscape Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Exhibit G -Aerial photograph P231 Charles Joseph Associates P232 PUBLIGPRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES November 14, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: 210/15 Freeway Storage Facility This subject property is located at the 210/15 Freeway ramp transitions (see attached exhibit and is currently zoned Open space. This is an ideal location for self storage type of use and will have little or no impact on the neighboring residents as most traffic generated will have the advantage of being directly adjacent to the freeway. There is currently the first phase of this project preparing for construction and this portion of the property will facility Phase 2 of the project as part of the previously reviewed and approved Master Plan for this property. The development code amendment previously approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides for Self Storage projects that abut freeways in order to provide for a buffer from single family residential. The proposed Amendment will provide for the ability for the phase 2 project to be completed with a Conditional use permit and provide the community with the assurance that the subject property will not be developed as commercial. We appreciate your continuing professional courtesy and assistance with this matter on behalf of our clients and have provided the attached exhibit documentation per the General Plan checklist and will be following up shortly with the Conditional Use permit application and related specific plan amendment to facilitate the proposed project. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information concerning this matter. Sincerely~~ ^~~. Charlie Buquet Charles Joseph Associates e 909.481.1822 888.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 0681 Foothill Blvd, Suite 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORFORATION ,.~ _~a~x ,~:., ,~ _~^~ i ' - - .- T H E C I T Y O F R A N C tl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, MPA SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003- 00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to master plan and develop a RV storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway interchange - APN: 0228-01 1-31. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - 210 Interchange; 210 Freeway South - Vacant land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). East - I-15 Interchange, I-15 Interchange. West - Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel; Open Space B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - 2101nterchange South - Low Residential East - I-151nterchange West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: This "landlocked" vacant parcel has no mature trees on the site. The site has a gentle north to south fall of 28 feet. The 210 and the I-15 freeway interchange border the site to the north and east. To the south is vacant land and to the west is the Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Cohtrol Channel. P233 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 2 D. Parking: There are three parking spaces for clients and the manager caretaker complex. In addition are five RV and boat spaces that will used as temporary spaces while the clients negotiate for onsite storage space. ANALYSIS: A. Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment: In conjunction with the development proposal, the applicant is requesting the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended to allow Recreational and Vehicle (RV) and boat storage at the proposed location. This amendment would only be in the Low (L) Residential District subject to a Conditional Use Permit and special development criteria. Because the applicant's proposed project is bordered by two major freeway systems, and not directly adjacent to residential uses, staff agrees with the applicant's request. This location would be better suited for RV and boat storage in comparison to single- family and multi-family residences, which would be adjacent to the freeways. It is very dubious that staff would receive any noise complaints caused by the proposed project. Staff recommends that the' language in the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended as follows: Part /l Chapter 5. 5.22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: GENERAL: The project only includes approval of Phase I (see Exhibit "A"). Phase 2, located south of the project site, is a master plan concept for future development and will require a separate Conditional Use Permit application and approval. The project, a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility, contains 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Access to the landlocked site will be from Victoria Avenue, just west of the I-15 Freeway, along a San Bernardino County flood control service road. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping on July 15, 2003, and January 20, and February 17, 2004. At the last design review meeting, the Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) recommended approval subject to design recommendations. A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of Approval. P234 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 3 B. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on July 15, 2003. The Committee recommended approval. A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendation has been included in the Resolutions of Approval. . C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committees reviewed the project on July 15, 2003, and recommended approval subject to the standard conditions outlined in the Resolutions of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II and the Environmental Checklist. It was determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts to short-term air and water quality during construction from grading, equipment exhaust, erosion, and water runoff. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air and water quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 and that it be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, .Brad L II - Cit P' I~~er Y BB:DF:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Design Review Comments Exhibit "E" - Applicant's Amendment Justification Letter Exhibit "F" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 P235 P236 EGwanda Specific Plan Part II Chapter .i (c) All parking areas and lighting shall be carefully buffered from adjacent residential uses. 5.24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 100 Establishment of District In order to carry out the objectives of the General Plan and of Chapter 3, an Open Space (OS) District is established. .200 Prohibited and Permitted Uses No use shall be permitted in the OS District except as specified below: .201 Flood Control channels, levees, spreading grounds and basins, roads, bridges, diversion drains, and utility installations including high voltage transmission lines and similar facilities. .202 Field crops, orchards, tree farms, truck gardening, berry and bush crops, flower gardening, wildlife preserves, and similar open or agricultural uses. .203 Other uses or enterprises similar to the above and approved by the Planning Commission. .300 Conditional Uses The following uses may be permitted subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. .301 Recreation areas, parks, playgrounds, fishing lakes, golf courses, polo fields, and golf driving ranges. 302 Wholesale and retail nurseries. 303 Similar uses involving the open use of land without substantial structures or improvements. 5.25 OVERLAY DISTRICTS 10D Establishment of Overlay Districts In order to carry out the provisions of Chapter 3, the following Overlay Districts are established: E/OL - Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District CS/OL - Community Service Overlay District EO/OL - Equestrian Overlay District SS/OL - Special Studies Overlay District 5-21 4/96 ETIWANVA SPECIFIC: PLAN OFFICIAL LAND USE MAP ~ , ~~ -_ ~ _- 1 „i Wilson Ave . ; ~~ ;' 1__ N ^N -„ ER "-_ a Ave! :.: Miller Ave' OP -- ---- __ VL I"' - -~I ER JHS n~~-1` .I~ ll_ p -'; u~`-VL .; '~ t `,vL . I ! JHSIVL VL OP FC OS P237 "/~j'" /\/ City Boundary ~ ~y Etiwanda South Overlay District Etiwanda Specific Plan Boundary N Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District N Community Service Overlay District Equestrian Overlay ,.s2_.~ Special Studies (Seismic) Overlay Boundary I ^.~' Foothill Blvd District Subarea 4 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ~, Fi lepat h: I:IPIan n i n glMikelC ou nter_G ISIS pecifi cpla ns. a pr ER: Estate Residential CC: Community Comm. 0-1 DU'slacre VL: Very Low NC: Neighborhood Comm. 1.2 DU's/acre L: Low GC: General Comm. 2-4 DU'slacre LM: Low-Medium FC: Freeway Comm. 4-8 DU's/acre M: Medium OP: OfficelProfessional 6.14 DU'slacre E, JHS, HS: CS: Community Service Schools P: Parks OS: Open Space I~ ------ --- -, -- -- - -~~ ~.~, ..,~.....~ .....'....... ~~ i avyaocsivesovorssotro ~...~ ~ js t€il'iE ~ ~~ {~ #~ ~~~ ,~~ n1 ~ ~i ~ 61; ~1 6 ~ ~~~ ~[ : i~1 ~ ~~ ~- ~- ~ (~~ I ~~~ I H. ~~ 0 ~r ~ o ,,` _; ~ -1 ~ _ ~, I P238 E Q ,I I i '~`d I a~ W ~i • P239 • a _~ ~, m ~T9R/o~P~1- ~, mmivaMm mn ~'~ axe ~~ ~~ .~..~ ~ mo+®+~ .~..~ ~~ .~..~ marts .~..~ 210 FRWY ~ANS~~pN ~ ___~_ ~~ r GONGcPTIJAL LANDSCAPE PLAN g~ xmuree ~ ~~iil~ ~gg ~ 88 L-1 C~ P240 Vice Chairman Fletcher commented that it will take a long time to complete the trail system and that the majority of it is completed as new development occurs. He asked that the City Council be encouraged to increase the budget funding for trails and that this is in line with the City's goal to be a "healthy city." He added that the Pacific Electric Trail is a good example of a trail that is being used towards that end and that there are many regular users. Kyle Brown, a student and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he regularly rides his bike on the Pacific Electric Trail. He said he would like to see our trails completed. Chairman Stewart remarked that the section of trail on Archibald Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street is now complete and that there are many users as well. Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Howdyshell, to forward the recommendations tothe City Council noted in Exhibit B of the staff report with the added request for more funds to complete the trail system and with the additional data regarding trail completion provided by Mr. Henderson. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ,, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY -carried k 1`Rk/ B. CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048. Donald Granger, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He made one clarification and noted that the original intention was to include self storage as well as RV storage in the proposal. He noted that this gives the project some flexibility. He noted Option 1 changes the land use description from Open Space to Residential and that it has a downside with the possibility of the property not being developed for storage, that the property would remain Residential under those circumstances. He said staff believes that this is not a favorable option because of the close proximity to the freeway. He reviewed Option 2; an Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment to allow the storage facility with a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District. He added thatwith the text amendment, final approval would be from the City Council. Chairman Stewart asked if this modification would only apply to this project. Mr. Granger confirmed that the text amendment would be specifid to this project site because of the wording, and with the location and the convergence of the two freeways, it would play out that way. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked how close the residential development is in relation to the project site. Mr. Granger said he is not sure, but that considering the flood control channel is 160 feet away and that the residential area is to the west even beyond that, it is a distance away. Charles Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, said he represents the property owner for both projects. He noted that the project site is approximately 250 feet away from the nearest residential area and is separated by a 20-foot high block wall that runs the length of the channel area. He said the Open Space area is a remnant from the freeway construction. He said the storage area is designed to have minimal disruption to the residential neighborhood. He said the infrastructure improvements include a bridge over the channel and frontage improvements to beneft Etiwanda Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 12, 2008 P241 BXHIBIT B High School. He said the project avoids disruption to the residential area. He said he does not believe the site is conducive to residential development. He also acknowledged Mike Diaz' contributions to the City. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the RV storage units are enclosed or outdoors. Mr. Buquet said there are both types; some have canopy coverings and othesr have garages. Vice Chairman remarked that the project looks right for the site, but so did the Aim All storage facility . that was adjacent to a residential neighborhood. Mr. Buquet said there were issues during the construction of the Aim All facility and that he was not involved with the project at that time. He added that this proposal includes certain improvements including a bridge over the flood control channel and fire/emergency access. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he agrees with staff that this is a good location for the use. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, to initiate the text amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan incorporating the provisions of Option 2 as outlined in the staff report with the inclusion of RV and self storage. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY -carried ...«. C. USE DETERMINATION DRC2008-00179 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. - A request to determine if a proposed "Fresh & Easy" market should be permitted under the "Specialty Food Store" land use category within the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 2). Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and asked the Commission to make the determination. Chairman Stewart invited the public to comment on the request. Norm MacKenzie, President and CEO of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce asked the Commission to consider the impacts on the existing businesses in the center. He said it would put 50 employees out of business and would be a workforce disaster; that the project does not support the goals of the Chamber; there are parking problems in the center now; the businesses located behind the proposed market would not have visibility to the street; the project is poorly designed; it may cause existing tenants to leave because of the adverse conditions, including those that are doing well. He expressed concern for the successful restaurants on the site. He opposed the project. Jerry Ogburn, from the Planning Center, reported that he is representing the property owners of the center and they have been working with the representatives for the Fresh & Easy market. He said the center has about 15,000 square feet of vacant space and is under performing; it is a strategic location for the west end gateway to the City; the project proposal would open up the site so that the businesses can be seen; the plan includes the removal of two buildings; and the property manager is willing to work with the existing tenants for business retention. He said they appreciate the concerns of the Italian restaurant and that they would be working with staff to do a parking analysis. He noted that employee parking would be located at the northeast corner of the site behind a loading dock. He said the proposed project would add to the landmark view of the Thomas Winery P242 Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 12, 20D8 s~~~ DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 interchange - APN: 0228-011.38. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideratidn. Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development consisting of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.4 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street. At the time the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I (9.8 acre parcel), with only Phase II (3.6 acre parcel) being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Over the past couple of months, the Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a CUP application that will complete Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of the master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence and a 1,600 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Phase I of Crossroads RV Storage and 210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange; Low Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - I-15 Freeway; I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway; I-15 Freeway West - Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and Victoria Street Retention Basin; Open Space (Etiwanda Specific Plan) EXHIBIT C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P244 DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Flood Control/Utility Corridor North - Low Residential South - I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: The proposed project is located at the confluence of the Eastbound I-210 and Southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 250 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. Access to the 3.6-acre parcel is from Victoria Street just west of the I-15 overpass, via a maintenance road for the flood control channel. The applicant has an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to use the maintenance road. ANALYSIS: A. Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment: Phase II of the master-planned project is located in the Open Space District, which does not permit recreational and boat storage and self-storage facilities. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously voted (Waverly absent) to initiate the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 proposed by Charles Joseph Associates. The amendment would specifically allow recreational and boat storage and self-storage facilities subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. In the unlikely scenario that Phase II is not constructed, the land use will remain Open Space and alternative development possibilities are limited under the present Open Space Regulations of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. With the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways and access challenges, any future proposals to change the land use designation to the 3.6-acre parcel would not be supported by Planning Department staff. Accordingly, given the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, the previous approval of Phase I and the master plan for the recreational vehicle and self-storage project, and site constraints that guide logical land use analysis, Planning staff concurs with the applicant's request to amend the text of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In order to conditionally permit the completion of the master planned project in a location that is very suitable for this type of use, and preclude development of recreational vehicle storage facilities and self-storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites, staff recommends that the language in the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended as follows: Addition of the following text to Part ll of Chapter 5, 5.24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS. .304 Conditional Uses: "Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage and Self-storage Facilities, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P245 DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 3 B. Use Description and Hours of Operation: As noted above, Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units of varying sizes. Phase I includes a caretaker's office that will service both the recreational vehicle storage and the self-storage facility. General office hours-are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 5 days a week. Access to the site after hours will be limited and controlled through the use of an access code. C. Site Improvements and General Design: Access to the 3.6 acre parcel will be off Victoria Street, via a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance road. The exterior elevations along the I-15 Freeway will match the style and rhythm of Phase I (stone columns with arches and split-face block exterior). Since the project is located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Area, the landscape palette and plant spacing along the east property line and in the planter areas on either side of the Fire Department's access road (near west property line) are designed to meet the Fire District's Fuel Modification requirements. Along the Victoria frontage, in keeping with low impact development and water usage reduction goals, the applicant is proposing rockscape and a drought tolerant plant palette. D. Land Use Compatibility: The premise of all Conditional Use Permits is to ensure the compatibility of adjacent uses and separation of potential nuisance activities. Land uses surrounding the existing facility consist of the I-15 and 210 Freeways to the east and south, and to the west is the Etiwanda CreeWSan Sevaine drainage channel. To the north is Phase I of the recreational vehicle storage facility. To the northwest, across the San Sevaine/Etiwanda Creek drainage channel is an existing single-.family neighborhood. Given the immediate proximity of the site to the I-15 and 210 Freeways and exposure to high noise levels that preclude the development of other land uses, the location is a logical choice for self-storage. A photometric study has been completed in order to demonstrate that illumination will be confined within the project site at or below the allowable foot candle requirements. In order to prevent light pollution, a condition of approval has been included requiring all light fixtures to utilize glare shields. E. Parkin :The use will not generate any off-street parking requirements since the operation involves the unloading, loading and storage of personal property. The caretaker's facility includes three vehicle stalls for office visits and customer service. F. Noise. Odor and Vibration: The proposed use will not create any noise, odor or vibration. G. Roof-Mounted Equipment: The proposed use will not require the installation of any roof-mounted equipment. H. Gradino Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on August 19, 2008. The Committee recommended approval. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed on August 19, 2008, by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart and Nicholson). At the meeting, the Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution of Approval. J. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project On August 19, 2008, and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. K. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Cultural Resources, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P246 DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 4 Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 20, 2008, at Etiwanda Gardens at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue. The applicant's consultant, Charles Joseph Associates, was available to answer questions. One resident attended the meeting and inquired about the noise levels the project would generate. Mr. Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates explained that the noise levels from the storage facility would be less than the I-15 Freeway. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received in regard to this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935 will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, Jams .Troyer, AICP Plan g Director JT:DG/ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Landscape Plan Exhibit E -Building Floor Plan Exhibit F -Building Elevations Exhibit G -Photometric Diagram Exhibit H -Fire Access Plan Exhibit I -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Report from Charles Joseph Associates Exhibit J -Design Review Action Comments dated August 19, 2008 Exhibit K -Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 12, 2008 Exhibit L -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 a (j W ~ ^ ' u~~.,3 o~°a. ~.i~~~ e =_ ie FREEWAY ~"o>W`oSg ',~3 -_~~=_ ~_-'_ ~c Ste' °ag~~° ~°! 1 ~_ -~~ -~ +-1 ( t ~t - Q `~ ~. gSREROR - _I _-~~~__ ~ ~ g ~ ~~ O &N~~ I d: Y~ wN ~ .~ 't'om; ~ u .iaecwRCr 11 !1~ ~ ~" r .tip g ~~^~ ~ . a ___ _ ti IIFF ~ ' II ~P d -i t ~~`~ 'C~O~P~ti 2'w '~ i I f Y` `t~ *- n ~i G 4~ 3~ 2 ~ ~ L. ~ ~;< ti~ ~ l ~~i Q- ---3'~~0 2 ~164~9 r 7 ji _~, s b' _D "` -)C" w'F Sap ~' ~ Y ~< f n tF4 ~ F r a ~ `¢ \.J t~ J'--~'T f Q G _- i / 'i XESY7II/ESY r~-p ~~ ~ ~ ~ k. S f~ ~ k p I'. ~i ~l. I ~ / II S 1 ~'I ~ ~ ~• eMA/ ~ /' t~ 1 y N 1 ( ~-_ } IV t LL [ I t P 1 '/ I! / Q J I ~s S6 Y' ~7 i cart / '~ f /~ ,' «^^` ' ~~ ilk ~\' E I ~~. ~ ~ ~/ /~ ~ ~/C ~_,p17'"~ ~j-- ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~~- "~~;~, ~~~ ~//; ~,.~ ,,, j- /- I ~~ /, ~ ~, V / I Q ~~~~ } I ~ ~ /~ ~'~ / ~ , Q ~G ', O °it 19 Ind / ~~0 ,- / e ;~ ~c ,: GQ p~~~ /fit'"` _,n'~.Ki i~_-ii~t/~ {.~ ~ ~ ,'' i ~0 -, f 1" /J ~ ! I >'I i ~\~' %~P~ . G~0 F~ P247 P248 3 } I III°~~~ pYp pF@ ~ ~ ~p ' ~~dd ~ 7 yoi $3 p ~ Pd g~g p [ EQ ~ ~ ~~~yy~33~ Y799$4'~ pp i n W" {~ pp e '~ 1 ~~ 3 9 3 3 ~S~:ry FgP, r i ~ o Q o @ E d gg1 36 € ~e~ ~ E~ e F ~•6~?i~ ~~dx:?9 6S Q pia w e d ~g ~~ Y ~ ~: ~ d ~ de p 4 i ~i 't @ ~ u °:i ~~h9e°d d€;~~°dy g ~ t 4 0 @i 44' e r ~~ e ~ ~ ~ ~S ~3 ~ ~} 6 ~ ~ a~ F 4 ~ C e ~ a `}! F;~~~ y¢ a y P @ Y} Yr ~ Yi S ~s E g{ ,, , 1 I ~ ie9$es~~i515.E~ g9 .~.F9~63:3:F9P}ed~6 r i i i ppp ~~h ~~f 6~ 9 I .. ,• ,~ ~` ~. \ ... ,; ~~ . - =_ ~ ~' '~. gas ~..` I ~ 9 ~` ;.. ~ ~. I •\ O '4~`b y \\ ~\ @. .,~ , , \j\ ~ b a ~, ~ , . . . _.. a z.. d b ~_ ~ e ~ I ~ e ~~~ W ~ o o x , , `~. \ d W y X A• ~~" Qo~ 9p ] X_F}Y_ _ N~p N ~ x • pi:~ .-.. ~~ 0. y rN tl i~ YI. X rl WWW ~ A i-N fl 11 11 M h ? i 1 9 py[ -p ~~ffYY ~i,'+ .\\\\\\ ~. E~e x \ s ~ M_la a-e u~ ~-~u( chi. ~'/4. v fl .e. ~ _..- @S `6 F. i§ P6~ e ai: ~3 I' .......... ti e o ~~h i~ O oe ~ i i '~ ''Y i ~ i I~ l I 1 1 I ~ -' ~ i ......... ~,,:.. __......... 0.._......... ~{ ........_.~ ~ -~n ~-~ N/SN9 b1UO1Jl~ iii V li O O~~ rN~Jd ~yH may °a °' iii \. \\\\ ,gp~ ~I70J MSfB )(W6apf11VdY:11tYC •r~~/a w.a.arc r~.yV vuumc b~4a ~ ~~ 3 6 JMH33NFJN3 OQ~tlNOB 3:JVtlO1S AFi SOVOtlSSOkiJ `> ~ O :• W . ~~ , wa ~~ ~ ~ a , ~ ~ ~ ° ~ S ~ a y - ~ TI z c G F \gI • + 'Gi S~ .~ ~ ~' Y . . 1 ' ~ G GG I ~~ _ G 1 1 I;~ G I t 'e ~, r'po mad F},9 ~ gqe3l ~~~~ RoA°A~~:P^'F `~ G .t e;Pe;i t~ pt! ' u n 9 >C ~ s/ _ :9 c . ^ .,.- - ~ !° o ': i'F~4 I t' i as \~ mss 4tY4p®® e Y 5 • ti. ! ~\ .~ ' 1 I . 'p B y ~e ' ~ e pp.n ~. ~ 1 1 6 p 3F 6 iG ~t !' -'i o'4, i 1 ~~ 9.Y ~d t _ 8y G .t t. : ~ ~ £~~ jQ s3gOYYi:Ias [y ee jyy 9999 g y p g o ; .~y~.8;i i'6: ~i i' : !tee ~6~6 ~(~" q g e < a ( g 9g qgg gryq g 9 g ¢ 22 oy 558~SeH r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ a ~' ~i F G i:f :~ I 'G t' ~ '1 .i 't G' ~, i S ' ' e ` t qt~ .t o 'o a ~t;t 't Stl-y, te G 'G !'~~ 1 io' ,I G' - , 'P:;'t I ' ' ~ R ~~ z S P "~ ~ a ,• ~ e t R -.i _..; o ~. ~ ~~~ a---a-~. ~e3 ~a 'w ~P ~ 6~~ p ~ G ! ~ ~ 1 ~ ; E'dt. ~ Q ~ ~! ~ ~ IEf99INtle99 ~~~! _ ~ 6F ~ .~ . o t, F~ 5~ 0 1 6 t ~ G.'I i 1 11 ' .p1. le 1 I f Y ®i 1 0 ` eti ~ ~' ~j 6 I Y t ~ F t k y !!Il V IIIGI•YI Gi Y111G 11t1!![A•t1111 f1! ~ tl ' _~ ~ F \ ~ dl ~ r , ~ i.l ~~ v 1 •~ e.. ~. _.__ _ ____~ \ ~ \ ,\ ~ je _ ~ E, ~ ~ F f ~~ R `~F ~i ! ~ ~ ~ '13MVrM'J -lopuvOJ OLYJ]d - JIa3y'J YONYMI(3 '•~ a ! 2 5 ---._-. __. _ g a -- .-.--.-.-.__-- ~~ N ~~ l7 T~ f`lcly oo O Yl a .^. f ~ Y ,y y a F ~0 :i b :i Z ~ vi ` RAA ~ V d Af pp A eY ~~ 1 ~~ { ~ ; ~ ~ •& ~ < ~ ~ e l F yp. I `k ZE ~ L ._~ ~ -~~ ~~ f 3 yp C ipgpg 9^, fjf fj(, 5 (~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~b l € 5 _ RF ~~ ~ l S ~ + ~ ~ F • { I c ~ ~~ ~ 66 Y ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I e. {~{ t ~ y~ ~y 69 @ p ~~ 9 p f q d~ E ~- W 6~4 ~ ~ A pp$g ti Q [ z E G1 ~ E R8~ 8¢ ~ {g E$ C[C i 3 3 '.= U y ~39 F 9 3 ' Y ~p~_'' S A~~~ ~ I ~ g } g } @ y y ~~ ~ ~~ ~ g ~ .. i.~ 6 .. ~- Q e ~ GS~ f 8~9 9 Egq gg d$g q j ~Y g 3§63A ~6s6i 6964 E ~ a ^ . ~ @ .Q I ~ ~ yEb~I ~ ~ ~ v U 9q3 pR~ F B ~~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ 8A2 E i P249 W H Q ~ Q ~wJ Q Z 4 ~~ ~~ 0 ~ y~ ~W V Q O y y IY Fg~ pppp ~ °i (7 a Cke ! ! ;paE et ~A 63e"e 80~ i p ~ ~ ° € 1 ] °- t €: j ! ~ €@ 1 ~ ~ a iii i` ° S ! ~¢ a ° ~ ~~~ $'g§ ~ ~~ 1:~~ ~a li ~ t all ~ e_3 ~a~al 9E'p ~ ~ ;~ $ ~- ;~ 4eS €np ~~e~ ~la A} i ~ ~lE ...3 .i:a.:.€! . a . o c c f ~ ' ii ~ ° l ~~~ I~l l ~$ lipd ` ~ € ~ $ ! 3 F BB pp!! Q$ : i i I~'q ~~ e ~€ 6~€~ €33: $ E ¢d a~ i $ p$1 k ~ Ea ea iap~ 3~ a i$ lp • 1 ° E eSf ~p ~e$ ~~"~ l~e~~ °~" ~ ~ ;i~ ~ '! ~g~ ~ € a ~ ~ ~ ! j ° E34 I° 1!di ~ e e &4~ e A3 1 €! E [ ! ! 6 d z3 ~ t3 F v u§ qb 6 i 5 b a 5 i:'~3:~ z y~e p }° a f 3 e a ;~off4~ pp~P! 33s; ~p u3 u3 i g € i eb 43 :Y g4 9 € i 8g'A a 6~ 6 m i~ 3~ t- t2 P " 933! !3 f ' ~~• ~ w:9 3e 31 ga a~ .g i • °k9r a :piai ~¢=_ 1 l A $ a $ a li a llg l '~ !I 9 i I fi@ ~ $ l~ $ f!! $ ' 1 4 a ,: ~~ie~a'l~i,$iG311'~a :a € a ~ p P ~ ~ E ~ € Y~ ~ ~ [ [ Q !3 I e ~ ~ p e G ~ep ~ a bg ~a e ~ ~ e i -la fPt 33 "s p it . a€ $ fg'ac yq~ i :: al ? ~' p € ~ Q 5 ~ i ! ip z€ ~ ~14q/ i; f Y ~ ! 9 ~ 1'4 ~ ~ evt r 9 $ ~ 4 A j ? ~ B ~ a s3s '~~ I ~~ € ~ ~ ~ ~? ~o- f x~ € ~A ~ ~ 3 9~ ° U 00000 O W 00 0000 'r,' . I ,, r b?~$ F €$E~~ b A` p`.$~ s~ S e a ;; Ii a"t i i ~~S~yii9.Sy.4 m p ~ p P250 ~~ ~ ~ W ... ~ ~ ~~ ~ C . C Q £ Q ~ a O 6 e N a E W L a ~ ~'~ ~ U ~ i w~fi`!. . ~ 'n ., a ^'+e,~ 3 p rcaa ~ 'i71 ~I. ` ~ ~ Q ~ - ~ / I \~ ~ ~ l e E i 2 ¢ O n2p i ans ~ i ' - I f II C ~ ` ~ l! n ~ ~ Z ~ C ~ n, v ~ , ~~ ~~ , . i i ~ , ,~ r~,,, ~. ~ ~ ., v v ~ y m ~ , z . .., tf w ~k i _ ~' ~~ . ~ ~ .i ~ ~ x§ /./ P.z{ = tll..; ~ ~ w ~~. fF~ `~~k' ~ q 4 ~.~ ~ t~ ~ a ~h I M1 s " d ~ ~ ~ _ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ' ~ / ~~ v,5 i ~ -_ _- ;~,', r~d e - ry ~~ - r: }.. ~ ~ - ~.~ ~~% Fop- V h -- ~ri 39 L JII - I A r y I I 1 p i y f..e~ ~ ,. _ ~, ` I ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ~ 3 s @ ~ ~__ +`I~ ~ ~ =i ~ 7 eqi~ 505 t g4~$~[4S= t :' I`' - i b N~ ~j e $559 5 I ~3: i __ ~~~ ~ -_ i ~ ~ t -- _ I' ~~ ~~~A~ ~ 1 ~{ e __ "#5'~I"irr _ y d' ~ C ~ ~ Sad ~ P ,~~"~ 5P „ I,at.! _ 1gk ~ `' f i~ ~ -F - "~ ~ *° 5r ~L h e err ~e a~x'~.i ~"~ -- x ~ ~ .~1~ L !:~' '" 9 4-'s 5_ 2 9 FY e,.~ w ~ '" ~~ S~~r~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~~~ ~3r1 ~ I ~ 3 I ~ ~ e e I y~ I ,a~ I 1 t \~ ~I e~ \~ 5j a .~-:•~ /~ p~ ~.ry ~M ~pf}i C~a e,S Ata.~ y t ~ @e ~ `ems e § __ "t' ~ n b'!f Mtn ^~ ~ ,, ~ Q 1 4 3 I• ~€° ~ I ~ a ra: ~ CE ,t~°aer . d `~ ~n ~. ~ .~ Yf~ F ~ 7 e 3 ! 9 I ~ ~~r 1 I . I I I I ~_ I ~~ ~ ~ • a ~~ +~e0-~ I I~I I I i I~ I I~ I~ ~I I I °e a €~~=`~- 3'`" ~~~i. ~ _I I I I 1 I I '_I I I~ ~ 5~ ~ IY d~ ~~ ~`._ ~~_,. I _ ~.. • z I _ _.. qe :. 5 9 i e:~ i~ i ~.II~' rrtr --- ~ e 5 G ~ 8 aay; ~ °- ii $ ep I SHE ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ S- r6 e .• tY ~ ti 19 ~j$g e -~. _ ee--`5~ ~e.-~ '.$r-- ~.='ye .-._ ee yilL _-r._S °u - 000'JO O OL7 OCri7J a , t, e' _ . s[ >s .~ y - - - _ -._ .% agv ~ ~ ~~ m ;: ~::. :...... 5@ :. . P251 q ~~ 9 E 2 ~ Z a= I o ~ i9 alieBg ~ "ee ° l a u o 6 yg ~ Y a o L ~p a~ ~e ~: ~- ~ 3 V a Q ~ C a. i a F 34a $: yq~ @~yi $E a ~j ona '> ~ '' ~~WP ~E @~@~6.q ~~~ ~~i~ 6Pf@ `e3a I a < y~ ~ a ~~ .,~ ~. ~ z i ~~ 3 4 ei~ ~ L s5° ~~ g 1° 8 8 '9 a P E§~ ~ 0 n i a } °eCy 51 99 fjF E ELI /\ ~ Si ~ ~ ~ ~ Y. 91 ~ 3y ~ V a 4B S ~ ~ [ 6 9 B t ~u ~ p U ~~ ~ ~p~ '/ ~ V 9xe 'I t) /,,,~\ ~, ~ ~,~;~ygp~pi9ij~r~~n~545@s a it ° ~~ I c in:.. /° j/ \ ~• ~ ~O V0000 O Ca0 ©000 9 ~ ~ j d / ~ iI / t ~.1 i +4, ~n. 9 its' / / ~[~ \~.~ ~ ~ ~ A. A Z ''r~ ~' ~, ~,. x ~~., o `~., _ ,°4 , n _ y ry~~ / r \ ` ~ K'y ~ VIIII ~< / r .~. .. . ee :'t L. ~" ~ J~ulu ~• '°~k°' // / • ate`'. \ ~ ~ ~'' \ n, s r / v ..i7 Irl T•~rl-t v ' F~ UPI, ~JluT 11Jl s '" ~3', / r v v~~~`v ~ v .i '~ I I T I V I A 9~4 ~ {b .~\ ~. \ F ! e Lk ~i vt~ x. +:a 7^ / b~ e ~~~a "x~*a ~'...aoK ~'„wv~wxn.e""~~i v, ~,_5; & ,..x. / /. Y \- \4c~,~..,. I. I ~ i . I. I ;dal. <' ~~ ~ ~ `..k{.' - A I ~I I •I I ~I /I I ~~. I I - I I °~ " ~ '-` hb°,yi~e _ _ _ O e'e a °. \ ~ _ '- t~~4~ e ,~J1 P. ? r e ~..~. r r =. \ z \ \l/ , F Z ~~ ' '. ~. ~- L d~ ~~ 4C ~ ~~.. LL a~ 6 9 1 _ p6 a§ ps i ~. . 4( ,._ _ YB .~a o' .r . ~~A ~.: - _ - __ _ . . .. _: - - P252 11111 111111 . y~m W~~mw ~ 6, ~ ~ ~,~ ~~~~ ~f~ ~~ ~a i i 6uiuue~d /emloel!UON edeospue~ I ~"~ v~aV4~°vmauo°~ine4 _~ ~~ dno~~ u6isa4 3•JVIiO1S Ntl SOVOHSSOtl9 p J s>I~oM .Cliunwwa~ vuarla'~v! 444446 0 ~1 BE G 6 4 6 d~'3e ~® .~ ae~eee~ e.~;; as ~ z z. b ~ k Y' a-@d'i o Jai? a~ ~ Paz?~~~ ~a3ad @S~ag: • ~~~YA~ ~~3`^ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 3~~~~3 '~ ~ dpi a ~ ~ ~.•~.~ ~- ~. ,~ ~ ~ ~ P253 a ; ? ~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~~~ ~ a i € E $$ e ~• 7 ~ A ad~~pip i~:°u ~. E ais S feii"A' e 2} b~ by ~ y e~ 2 i w e o t e:~ i~F$q AA 'u ~§ 9 ~ ~ i ~i Ai ~ ~~ g ~ S S~ ~ e ~ e_ ygyg {y g@ '., ~~~i9~ ~ A: 8ii 9i~ ~3~~ O J~000 O 00 ®Ot~O id ~ / W ~ s ~ i ~e /~ ~ ~q i 4 i i ~~ - - ~i 1.1~ / - ~ ~ i H ~ r ~ y e .~~ - 7 !/_ ^~ I ^~ I I - I PE 'I aR[ tl4: el O~5 pS I ~.' y1 ~ N~ ,'^ I I nl I vk S=. P4 ~ I f?.-~ ~ I tl'^ I g pr~ g~ L y ~ E ~ ,I ~ ~ € ~~ °t ~ 1 ~ ~C§ I d ra(~ I v ~~• r 1 m I ~ I ~ 1 E~ I ^" i a 3 ~kF I ° ~€~ I d ~ o wE O S~ Q Y C Q ~ O d J O 6 U °3°¢ 7 = y W O 1 U c¢'a n e adf 1 LL ~ W tl ~ m i u K ~ u P254 ~ 30VtlOlS Ad SOVOkf550H0 ~ r •• ONIN33NFJN3 OOlVN09 N ~~ Q ~~ N mm ®~ ~9 ~~ :9 . :9 t l ~ i - a ~a a ~ , o a j a g la j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a ' ~ 's ; t` m I a & a ~ I I ~ a ~ o _ o ~ ~ ° ~ j a m J ~ ~ . ~ a ~~ ° ~ ~ e ri >s I ~ ,-YIrlBORl~19~ ~~ j ~ ~ ~. 8 ~ I ~ a , ~ 1 ~ - 1 a a ~ j ~ I a ) a 1 ~ ~ ~ a ~ B I a I i ~ s l a F 1 B J ~ ~ i a ~ fi ~~ ro is ,a . ~g rr , z R S o ~ i g v ~ a I m l ' ~ J o ~ j§ J a o ~ N l I 4 § 9 i ~ J ° ~ ~ 1 -YK L40gYE i 6 ~ 1- tl/C li. WQlli $ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 L ~~ i ) :9 .~ ~ $ ~ ~ A / q/ / B a q ~ ~ I & ~ B I ~ ~ 41// /~ °n 1 q 1 / ~, ~i / q I s ~ 1 ~ ~ ~;%- a ~~J { s / 6 ~' / '~ 'S' j ~ ~ J a a / / a I /b~ '~ // nl I ~ +>7' ~i/ l / / v - ~ / / ~' ~/ ti ~~ I & ~ ~ z e . ~ ~I a / ~ ~ / ~~~% ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~° ° EI I & / ~~ °~ ~ ~ j s ~~ ~ ~~ I ~ >=i &~ J a ~ ~ a ~ a m -J € ie ~ ~ ' g ~ i ~ g u a ~ 0 0 y 0 j j ~-vK Sa wm'e~ 7 m m m P255 a H ~I 0 ~Ntl~d S`JNIQIIl1B vavau~o ®uavo~~ ~«m~,,. a Y~a,:.~.u~ w~..b.,.,e.... n..~, ~~ $1 a, 6 • ~ p g _ ONIH33NFJN3 OO~VNOB 3OVkfO1S Ad SOVOHSSOkiO ~,. 3 ~Q 'v 1 ~ ~, wv { i a s :0 ,~, ~ „ I .. .... ., __ ...._. ~ 9 '4 N ,0 : ~ ~, O "-: • S .. •_ _. a 0 ry R # $ - ' . _ s o "J S ' $ ! a , j a ° f Q £ I ~ ° o ~ A ~I o 9 , I' ~ ~ 4~, 9 ° F ~r ° q p F R o ~ :, ~ 2 i _ 9 g ° ~ a r R ~ p p i n i ° ! ~ ~ ° ~ a i I ~ ' ° ° y A .~ I g rv `~ Ili a 4 y I p Fi I q ri F N _ 9 a a i ~ I n rv ~ rv ~ a 4 ~ .. r ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ^ p C I a ° F ah IL ~ f ° R n I ° ° ~ Fi G A i~ _ ,~ a q ° L I $ 9 i ° R o k s, I ' ~ ~ ~ , 1 m rv ~, i ~ . . .. Y o . i u a a I a °~ S ~ ,~ ~ ~ a t ~ ® ~~ ~ I 1I a ~ ~. ; ° I - ~ ~ a ~ ~ R I °~ $ ~ ~ ° i I I ` I a a I n ~ a ~ ; rv R l i ~ a . v i a ~ l ~ r { ~' 9 _. e 8 k a i 6 ~ .. m ~ ~ e ° ~ a I 9 a v r ° ° a ° ° rv I, ~ ~ i a ~ 6 ° ^ ~ rv n i a ~ i I .Zrv rv IL ~_ 6 i f j D i °on ° i 'I rv $ O ~ a e ~ `l l ~ R ~ m B j l ~_ t l~ ~ ° $ S ~ 4 ' 4 ~T; ~ i I N ~ I H ~ f ~ y W~ ` a n I i i' g'~~~ I g .$. rv ____.___. v e a R ~ i I o ~ ~, ~, ,~ ,~ R W R .~ , ~ ~~ - - ~ 0 0 a ~ g ~ ~ ~ _R ~ rv ~ W ~ k 9 i a i ' ~ I R ~~ '~ .~ A~ d .~ .~ R S A s ~ e ' 9 0 iu a ~~ ------------- -. ~ ~ ~ = , ~ z = 1 R~~~~~~~~ ~ . 0 0 I ~ I o m m __.. ..__---. .---...... .___-. - ~ m P256 2 ~.~m.~ ..,.. ..b. ~A® BUIIDING'B', WEST- PARTIAL ELEVATION (BUILDING "A' -EAST ELEVATION SIMILAR 1 B01 1~6f ~a..,.. ~ u1 ~ M m' ~ g~f' ^3 ' ' ' ' a P " -WEST ELEVAT BUILDING B , EAST- PARTIAL ELEVATION (BUILDING A ION SIMILAR) ~ 1 ~ F ~°"'°'"~.... .'E ~ ~ ~ _ rtM x. J ~~ u .... .w ,_.. a~....w Z fU0 ~ opt BUILDING 'E', SOUTH ELEVATION (BUILDING'D' -'H' ELEVATIONS SIMILAR) 0 9 ~~ W a ~ t F ~{3 I a ..w..,,..,..., es?~~+, a~ BUILDNG 'B', SIDE ELEVATION (BUILDING 'A' SIDE ELEVA110NS SIMMR :a,`~ 5 BUILDING'E'. SIDE ELEVATION - ~e 4 7 O ~. va ""`~ i ~ s„w ~ i j , ARCH DETAIL ELEY/PLAN - 8 TYP. SINGLE LOADED BLDC. SECTION 7 TYP. DOUBLE LOADED BLDG. SECTION 6 N V 1gOd ~ 1MIOd • Mild iLB a ~ ~ I ~....,.~,,,~ ~.,~,o~ ,. ,,. •. . c+ P258 '. ®s~i A'vowdau ~...,va..e.a.. oa~a~ioaa oaivaoe aoraolsmar saroassoaa ano ", ", , tk ~ i LLWU~e~I~ ~ 6 ~i P259 e i N/SN9 b'/2101~/rl W P260 Charles Job h Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Crossroads RV & Storage -Phase II Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: August 20, 2008, 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm. Meeting presentation of project could not be formally presented, due to only one homeowner attending the neighborhood meeting. Available for review with the homeowner was: Phase I and Phase II full size colored landscape plans, and elevations, Phase I and Phase II Site Plans, and Building Materials Board. Her inquiry was concerning noise, due to the fact that her husband worked unusual hours, and usually slept during the day. Her main interest was the Phase I component, which was approved over 4 years ago. She was advised that,Phase I facility operations will be consistent with City noise standards and will generate less noise than adjacent freeway. Mr. Buquet also pointed out that there would be a 14 foot wall around the Phase I project and will add as a barrier between Crossroads RV, Phase I and the existing homes. Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fas 909.481.1824 L~iS' Centex • 7068] Foothill Blvd., Suite 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CAI.I I'ORNIA COP.YORA'1'lON P261 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Donald Granger August 19, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) DRC2003-00048, a master plan for a recreational and boat storage facility on 9.87 acres of land at the intersection of the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway interchange, north of Victoria Street. At that time, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048; the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I with only Phase II being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Over the past couple of months, Planning Department staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a CUP application that will complete Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Design Parameters: The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. Access to the 3.6 acre parcel is from Victoria Street via an access road, west of the I-15 Freeway overpass. For Phase II, the applicant is proposing a total of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. The exterior elevations along the I-15 Freeway will match the style and rhythm of Phase I (stacked stone columns with arches, split-face block exterior, and fluted block at the top of the wall plane). Since the project is located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Area, the landscape palette and plant spacing along the east property line and in the planter areas on either side of the Fire Department's access road (near the west property line) are designed to meet the Fire District's Fuel Modification requirements. Along the Victoria Street frontage, in keeping with a low impact development and water sensitivity, the applicant is proposing rockscape, synthetic turf, and a drought tolerant plant palette. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. There are no Major Issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. P262 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 19, 2008 Page 2 1. The applicant has not provided any conceptual sign locations. Given the proximity and visibility from the I-15 Freeway, staff requests that the Committee provide input regarding the location, size, and illumination of wall signs on the east elevation of Building B. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the proposed project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval of the Site Plan .and architecture with the understanding that the applicant will return to the Design Review Committee at a future date to present a detailed sign package for review and approval. The applicant agreed to present a sign package to the Committee. The Committee also required that all lighting be designed to have glare shields, and that wall pack lighting be minimized in order to prevent light pollution. P263 `~ - - f;: ~' T H E C I T Y O F R A N C U U C U C A M O N C A Staff Report DATE: March 12, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048. BACKGROUND: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.47 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street (Exhibit E). At the time the Planning Commission approved DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I, with only Phase II being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Phase I is approximately 9.87 acres in size. The staff report containing the language stating that Phase II would require a separate Conditional Use Permit application and consideration is attached (Exhibit B). In conjunction with DRC2003-00048, a text amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan (DRC2003-00047) was also approved that included a resolution recommending approval of recreational vehicle and boat storage facilities within the Low Residential District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, if a site was not adjacent to single-family or multiple-family residences, and if the site was adjacent to both the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The text amendment was subsequently approved by the City Council on May 19, 2004. Over the past couple of months, Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a Conditional Use Permit application that will complete Phase II of the master plan (Exhibit E), the undeveloped 3.6 acre parcel. ANALYSIS: Since the Planning Commission approval of DRC2003-00048 was limited to approval of Phase I, the applicant is proposing to submit a new Conditional Use Permit request to develop Phase II. However, before Phase II can proceed, it is necessary to determine the P264 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 2 most appropriate means for entitling the project given the existing land use designation and previous Planning Commission direction related to the project. At the time of approval of Phase I, the parcel was located in the Low Residential District, and Phase II was located in the Open Space District. As discussed above, the text amendment that was approved in 2004 is only applicable to the Low Residential District. Thus, there are two options that could be initiated that would appropriately entitle Phase II of the master plan under the present land use designation of Open Space. The two options are as follows: Option 1 -General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Amendments: The applicant could propose a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and an Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment (ESPA) to amend the land use designation from Open Space to Low Residential, in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application. With this option comes the possibility that should the land use change be completed and the recreational storage facility not be constructed, the 3.6-acre parcel will remain residentially zoned. Given the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, Planning Department staff would not support a residential land use designation at this location. Accordingly, staff sees this option as being problematic. Option 2 -Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment: The second option is to process an Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) Text Amendment to allow recreational and boat storage subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District. Under this scenario, if the project is not constructed, the land use will remain Open Space and the possibility of residential development is precluded. Staff would also recommend including a footnote to the final draft of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment that would read as follows: Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage is a Conditionally Permitted Use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. The addition of the footnote would preclude development of recreational storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites for recreational storage facilities. With the text amendment and corresponding footnote, both the logical completion of the project would be permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and the potential residential development scenario that could result from a GPA and ESPA would be avoided. Of the two options, staff believes that Option 2 is the better choice since in the long term it will prevent a residential land use designation in a location that is not otherwise suitable for residential development given its immediate proximity to both freeways. Should the Planning Commission direct staff to initiate Option 2, the project will require the review and approval of the ESP Text Amendment by the Planning Commission with final consideration and action by the City Council. Initiating the_Specific Plan Text Amendment would allow staff to begin a thorough analysis and notify property owners of a public hearing to consider the amendment. Public hearings at both the Planning Commission and City Council will be required. Initiation does not presuppose an approval action. P265 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the proposed request, and through minute action, direct staff to initiate Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 as outlined in Option 2. Respectfully submitted, ~~ James R. Troyer, AIC`~ Planning Director JT:DG\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Letter of Request from Applicant dated November 14, 2007 Exhibit B -Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 2004, without Attachments Exhibit C -Section 5.24.300 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Exhibit D -Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map Exhibit E -Site Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Exhibit F -Landscape Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Exhibit G -Aerial photograph P266 Vice Chairman Munoz responded that with that in mind he would then support separating out the project approvals because he cannot support the suggestion of more than the one hour change request (as stated in his own motion). Commissioner Stewart replied that she does not wish the project to go down but that they should give the store the chance. She said she would be willing to withdraw her motion and that she is not suggesting they be open 24 hours. She said she does not want to see it killed because of hours. She said they are giving them some leniency to see what will work and it would probably come back anyway at a later time. She said they should give them a chance, residential is not there yet, and let them try to comply and if it does not work, the Commission can bring it back....one time event. She said she believes this situation can tolerate this change. Chairman Fletcher said it is a new project, these are standard conditions that are set for the City and if they change them for every project they will not have standard conditions anymore. He said they are asking the Commission for a change but these standard conditions are in place for a reason. He said if there was no second to Commissioner Munoz' motion, then he would second it. Commissioner Stewart withdrew her motion but she said she believes they (standard conditions) should be looked at on a case by case basis. Mr. Troyer said Commissioner Munoz' motion remains in place with the request for a second. Commissioner Wimberly seconded Vice Chairman Munoz' motion. Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan amendment DRC2008-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan amendment DRC2008-00161 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action with a request to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Additionally, the Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 and Conditional Use Permit and Design Review DRC2008-00163 with the change in hours (condition 7 a & b, and 8 of the standard conditions, Section D -Shopping Centers) to reflect the hours of operation (including deliveries and store hours) from 7:00 a.m. -11:00 p. m. as amended. The Commission approved Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 by minute action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -carried ._... G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008- 00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for onsideration. EXHIBIT D ing Commission Minutes -8- September 24, 2008 P267 Donald Granger, Associate Planner, presented the staff report Commissioner Stewart commented that Mr. Granger prepared a great staff report, that she appreciates the clarity he provides and his presentation. She thanked him and congratulated him on a nice job. Vice Chairman Munoz referred to page G & H -195 of the agenda packet, condition #3. He said that he did not see a date that the sign program would be due. He said he would like to see some sort of milestone set, such as its submission prior to issuance of the grading permits. Chairman Fletcher asked what the concern is about. Commissioner Munoz said it is about timing. James Troyer, Planning Director, said that it would be reviewed by the DRC and the motion would have to be seconded and adopted as part of the project. He said vice Chairman Munoz is suggesting that it be prior to grading permits being issued. Charles Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, said the entire property is under one ownership. He noted the access from Victoria Street and that the architecture will mirror the upper portion of the development. He reported that no signage is proposed for Phase 2. He said it is important to respect the sign ordinance and it is important to work with businesses in these times. Mr. Troyer commented that no signs have been approved for Phase 1 and he said there are no signs for Phase 2 either. He asked if the proposal will be submitted for both phases at one time. Mr. Buquet said the original project is Phase 1 that was approved and the signage will have to be approved by the City. He said there is no signage proposed for Phase 2. He said it would be a permit, not a sign program. Commissioner Stewart asked if Phase 1 has an approved program. Mr. Buquet said no sign program is being presented and no signage for Phase 2 is contemplated and he questioned "reaching back" to a prior project. Vice Chairman Munoz said he wants to see a Sign Program forthis project, the project was already approved and that the Commission wants the sign program to be presented before a certain milestone; and they would like to see something. Chairman Fletcher asked if there are any conditions in the approval for Phase 1 pertaining to this. Mr. Buquet said no and that the protocol is that it is typically part of the building permit process and that it is understood it is subject to approval by the City. Vice Chairman Munoz noted he is concerned they have not seen a sign program for Phase 1 or 2 and the concern is because he does not know what will go there. Mr. Buquet said any signage proposed would be part of Phase 1. Vice Chairman Munoz replied that is what they are referring to. Mr. Buquet reiterated that he knows it needs to go through the approval process. He said he is concerned that he heard mention of a condition for a sign program be submitted prior to grading, but there is no signage contemplated for Phase 2. Planning Commission Minutes -9- September 24, 2008 P268 Chairman Fletcher replied that it is anon-issue. Vice Chairman Munoz asked staff how we can accomplish that without violating codification Chairman Fletcher said this application is for Phase 2 and he questioned how the Commission could go back to the prior approvals for a prior phase. He said that since no signage was submitted then, he has no objection to signage. Vice Chairman Munoz said he is commenting on conditions that exist today in the agreement. Mr. Buquet responded that signage can be proposed for any project anytime or additional signage after the approvals. Chairman Fletcher asked that if he has no signage, then does he have a problem with the proposed amended language. Mr. Troyer said the conditions call for a detailed Sign Program to be reviewed by the DRC. He said that if there are no signs then there is an unnecessary condition on the project. Mr. Buquet asked that the condition not be modified, and not tie it to a grading permit if it does not apply to this phase. Vice Chairman Munoz said it is then a "catch 22" in that the other phase is already approved. He asked then if there would be no sign program to be approved for this project (as a whole). Commissioner Stewart asked if they are bringing back a sign program for Phase 1. Mr. Buquet said yes. Commissioner Stewart asked if there is a timeline. Mr. Buquet said no. He said the market is frustrating right now. Vice Chairman Munoz asked if he has a problem giving the Commission a timeline for the sign program. Mr. Buquet said they are talking about Phase 1 which is already approved and not under consideration this evening. He said Phase 2 has nothing to do with Phase 1. He said if Phase 1 wants signage they will have to come in and he does not have a timeline for that. Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, read from Exhibit J -the DRC action comments dated August 19, 2008, which noted that all signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements and that the project was recommended for approval by the DRC "with the understanding that the applicant will return to the Design Review Committee at a future date to present a detailed sign package for review and approval. The applicant agreed to present a sign package to the Committee." Mr. Buquet said that is correct, for Phase 1 and at the time that comes in, but he has no timeline. Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly noted that the project is a good use for that land parcel and that it has been vacant with "no other takers" for some time. He said it offers the possibility of living close to commercial uses and services and that he looks forward to seeing the development. Planning Commission Minutes -10- September 24, 2008 P269 Commissioner Howdyshell said it is what you can do with that space. She said this development flls a need for the community, residential development there would not be good there and this development is a good idea. Commissioner Stewart commented that the development is compatible but she noted the issue with the sign program. She remarked that she was unsure what they could do for Phase 2 that would make it happen for Phase 1. She said condition #3 is ok without the amendment. She said the developer will have to come back, that no signs have been approved at this point and something has to come back. She said they need direction on that. Mr. Granger remarked that the concerns have been heard, that it is a high profile location. He said that the normal procedure would be for the applicant to submit a sign permit application for staff level review because it is not a uniform sign program, but that with all new applications being submitted now, would be submitted for review to the DRC along with the rest of the project. He suggested that for the minutes/official record, when a sign permit package is submitted it should not stay at staff level but be forwarded to the DRC for review and approval. He said this way it will not just be an administrative action and that it can be isolated from the approvals tonight. Steven Flower, Assistant CityAttorney, noted the concerns of limiting the approvals this evening to Phase 2. He said the project (Phase 1 and 2) is essentially all one project and that it was approved as a master plan and therefore a single project (the whole of the project in CEQA terms). He said the Commission could take staffs recommendation and bring the signage forthe entire site backto DRC for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Chairman Fletcher asked if there would be a timeline attached. Mr: Troyer suggested the package be reviewed by the DRC within 30 days of its submission Vice Chairman Munoz said that would be ok. Chairman Fletcher reopened the public hearing. Mr. Buquet said irrespective of the master plan, this project was approved underthe old sign criteria which was to fle an application for a sign permit. He said that is how Phase 1 was approved and now we are on Phase 2. He asked for clarification of when the review would occur if he meant 30 days from submission it would be reviewed or if the City wants to review it 30 days from now. Mr. Troyer said we would want to review it within 30 days of its submission to allow for a timely review. Mr. Flower noted that is for the applicant's benefit. Commissioner Stewart said that it seems reasonable. Mr. Buquet said "we are majoring in minors." He said his client's priority is getting design/construction plans through Phase 1 and Phase 2 is not on the radar right now and at the appropriate time they will bring that in and they should not have to go through some extraordinary process. Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Munoz concurred that the project is an appropriate use of the land and probably the best suited project for the site. He said that the developer put much work into the design, including photometric studies. He said it is a good project, signage notwithstanding. Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 24, 2008 P270 Chairman Fletcher agreed that it is a good location for the use and that self storage is needed in this part of the City, convenient, close, and a great location. He said he is confused about the signage and that it is a non-issue at this time, that when the sign package is ready, they will have to get it approved. He said he favors the project as it stands. Vice Chairman Munoz asked legal counsel for clarification on the timing, specifically noting page G & H - 195, condition #3. Mr. Flower said he did not hear a motion to change the condition. Chairman Fletcher reiterated that it is anon-issue, there is no signage on Phase 2 and when they are ready to come in with signage on Phase 1, it will have to be approved. Mr. Flower said it is anon-issue. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Howdyshell, to make no changes to the conditions of approval, adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and recommend approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action and approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 by adoption of the resolutions. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -carried ..... I. PUBLIC SLOPING MEETING FORA SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) DRC2008-00381 FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIAARBORS MASTER PLAN) DRC2008-00383, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2008-00384, AND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA01-02) DRC2008-00385 -FOREST CITY COMMERCIAL - An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in an SEIR for a potential build out proposal for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Base Line Road to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Interstate I-15 to the east. Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, presented the staff report. Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing. No one from the public made any comment. Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing. Chairman Fletcher asked if the Commission wanted to comment. Vice Chairman Munoz said it is his understanding that they are here to hear the comments and not to make them. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney stated that the Commissioners are free to comment on the initial study and if they think there are other environmental impacts that they think should be studied as part of the Supplemental EIR. Chairman Fletcher said they have looked at various alternatives and whether the development be mid or high rise, he thought the skyline view from the freeway would look appealing. He said the development at the Gardens has been a work in progress. He said he would like to see how the Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 24, 2008 P271 Tie .~ - .,,~ ~' City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) ,:. ' .. ., .. The~purpose of thisform is to inform the City of the basic comp project so that the City may reviewthe projectpursuant o City'P~ Guidelines:;'~the California fnJironmental.Quality':Act; and .Procedures to Implement CEQA. it is important that the inforn tFie _~Ci • , .,. ... _applicatlon.be pro`vided:in.full: ". ,•. Upon. revtew*of the` completed Initial .Study Part I and the d'evelt additional information such as, liutnot limitedto, traffic, noise,~6iolii ... , geologicaLrePorts may be required, .The projectapplication uvill nota :unless the identified specieF studies/re,ports are submitted for~revi .. complete and adequate The`,p~oject application will not be schedu review unles"s all required reports aie• submitted and `deemed"cl prepare =the Initial Study Part it as required. by CEQA.. Iri addition - 'applicant will' •be rtsponsible to, pay. or reimburse the-City, its"age }consultants, for aq costs.-,for the, preparation, review,• analysi§ xmitigations, etc., ofany-=special studies or reports ~ , r y INCOMPLETE APPLICAT/ONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time ofsubmittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: DRC2004-0048 Project Title: Crossroads RV 8 Storage Name 6 Address of project owner(s): Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Rd Victorville, CA. 92392 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor.' Bruno Mancinetli 13109 Sagehen Rd Victorville, CA. 92392 EXHIBIT E itudy Partl.docPage 1 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 P272 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above). Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Telephone Number *1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o(the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views info the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location o/each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Southwest of 210-15 Freeway Interchange. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 0228-011-38-000 *6) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 3.6 *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 3.6 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Development district amendment to OS in Etiwanda Specific Plan self-storage as a Conditionally Permitted use in residential zone where site is generally surrounded by freeway and flood control channels. Scheduled for March 12th. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 2 of 10 Rev. 3/17104 Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. agencies in order to fully implement the project: Grading & Building Permits. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Currently vacant land with weeds/vegetation on site. There are no structures. See updated Biological Study and negative declaration was approved for general site area 2004. Approved RV storage facility tc North exis- ting 15 Freeway to the east. To the south existinq flood control & 15 freeway. To the west is existin flood control channel & basin Site is continually disced for weed abatement purposes. 10) Describe the known cultural and/orhistorical aspects of the site. Cite all soumes of information (books, published reports and oral history): There are no known historical or cultural aspects on this site. P273 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 3 of 1D Rev. 3I17I04 P274 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (airoraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Existing roadway and freeway noise that will not affect proposed use of property, and will serve to buffer existing residential to the North West. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate i/ there are proposed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) ilnecessary: Self vehicle storage facility consisting of surtace storage stalls for surrounding community self storage needs. The project will be constructing 10' tall decorative wall which serve as a noise buffer of the existing residents to the northwest. 13 aspects. Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commemial, etc.), intensity ofland use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North - 210 Freeway beyond RV Storage project South - 15 Freeway & existing Victoria St. East - 15 Freeway West- Flood Control basin, beyond that Etiwanda School District 14) loll the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? This project will enhance the area that is currently vacant Land and provide buffer for existing residential. As intended with originally approved master plan. The property is currently zoned for residential Flood Control or Open Space. This project use will have less Impact then residential and is a needed use in area and will ultimately be consistent with the RV Storage project to the north. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.docPage 4 of'IO Rev. 3/17/04 P275 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods o/soundproofing are proposed? Short term construction noise only, no long term impacts. "16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: County of San Bernardino Flood Control Facility directly west of and adjacent to project. Approval from the Director of County Flood Control has approved our drainage to connect 18) Indicate expected amount o(water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commemial/lnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ^~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cladreation, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) b. Commemial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 0 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERIInitial Study Partl.docPage 5 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 P276 21) Anticipated rangeo(salepncesand/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (permonth) $ to $ 22) Specify number ofbedrooms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24)' Indicate the expected number o/school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Distdcts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: _ c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Self storage of personal Storage materials. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 62,964 27) Indicate hours oloperation: Monday-Saturday 8 am to 6 pm 28) Number of employees: Total: toff-site (o7 caretakers unit Maximum Shift 8 Time of Maximum Shift 8: I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 6 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 P277 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): Caretaker which will also be office manager for both projects with occasional off-site maintenance workers for facility. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that cunent/y reside in the City: 2-3 "31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): None that require a special permit. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, frm, and flood control agencies serving the projectbeen contacted to determine theirability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services to the project. 33) I:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.tlocPage 7 of 10 Rev. 3/'17/04 P278 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and pmposed method ofdisposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissiorUP/anning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented am true and correct I best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted befon= an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 3-4-08 Signature: Title: President I:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Inilial Study Partl.docPage 8 of 70 Rev. 3/17/04 P279 1. View from east towards project entrance & 15 freeway. 2. View of project entry. P280 View of Project entrance north along Flood control channel toward basin and gel _ existing residential. P281 - Y ~ W 3' 3 ~ ~s~ ¢oW3 ¢- ~ v C ~ C ~y n d p 9~i z~ 210 Freeway p C ~p Wa . e e o> ;' -- ~ ,. r _ q+ . ^, __ 5 , 4d, D 2 _ _ ~ ~~. ~ \\\` ~ y P Inky„ v I ~/~ v ~ i.g II ~ 1 5 rru ! ~S„1 , ~ f 11i - - - ~. ~ ti -- r, ~ 6~0 . ~ II G~~O 2,' `• i, i Q, . i ~ '~ ------ i . s _ x ,~, Q --~ . ~ ~ '`~____ m _ - '~--~ ~= N p, .. 6 :0 ~~ O .~ eL O n~ ~~ O b~ ` > N ,.. r ~r ... _ y m F~ V 1 ^ (~, ~ f ¢ ,. - p ~ ~ h 1 . ti / ~/~.I i /~ rm'1 ~y \y~ ~~ /~, a~~ ~ .~ P282 `-. P283 . mmit A I ' %' / ~ G ___- ve , Su I R = Sch ~ ~ r= = " ii_ _ - _~~ _ - r,---- i - - !h-~ ~j ~~, 2.+~ a ~ -~ I~ 27 ,~ 505 li _ __ --- _- !~~ _ _ /~/,•: _ Gaging r' • - I+ ~I f 5~1i1q• % ~-. - ~~.,,_~ I a II ~~ Project Site ;! ~e ~~=: __- ~ __ II r ~ ii i ¢~ _ „ _ _ O 1 15 , _ ~~ /414: ' ` ~~`"'' - _ -~` ~; , _ ~ _~-_- _ i. - ,~ Well I - . , . li. _ it • ~„~" _ : _ ~ ~~ ' a ;' i.~ . •. J ~ _ ~ . ~' ~ __ =____ / II I ~ i .~~~:._ _.... - r -- -:i ~ " t ~~«_ i . ,, . _ ... X33: -„-,~ = _ ,::: -~• ,' i--: y .-. _ ____.~ ..-- _-~ ~`. '`_~ I . , ~ ~ _ PAGJFI - ._. "-~ j~ ~ ?. , ! _ . ~y f ' ~` t CG ~" J . ~ r ~ i T q _^ ; ._. - ~ ~~ ": y - ~' s _ ili iq~o(iuik Cgi~lui~row c.lmw. l'awew4 nff oyw4 .mw..mn:OSC:; h-i~~, Y,y:,: Gf00 n.L,a: Iae m,wa. wcw ECOLOG~CSI SCi E,rC E 5 c Marcn 2008 plate 2 Site Vicinity 13-acre Siie P284 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 2. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5, Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 Freeway and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. The proposed project is Phase II of a recreational vehicle and self-storage facility located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Access will from Victoria Street, then north on access road, across a bridge over the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, then into the project site. Fire Construction Services has reviewed and approved the emergency access plan. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli, c/o Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Flood Control/Utility Corridor 6. Zoning: Open Space 7. Surrounding Land Uses, Setting and Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.4 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street. At the time the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2003.00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I (9.8 acre parcel), with only Phase II (3.6-acre parcel) being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. The applicant is now seeking an entitlement for Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. P285 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 2 As noted above, the proposed project is Phase II of a recreational vehicle and self-storage facility, located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I.15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned project, a recreational vehicle storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Across the flood control channel and northwest of the project site are single-family dwelling units. The subject site is vacant with no improvements. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources O Hazards & Waste Materials '(/) Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities & Service Systems /) Agricultural Resources /) Cultural Resources /) Hydrology & Water Quality /) Noise Recreation /) Mandatory Findings of (/) Air Quality (/) Geology & Soils ()Land Use & Planning ()Population & Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: Rev. 3/13/07 P286 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 and ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 Page 3 ~/~ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared E Date: Cj I Reviewed Date: D Rev. 3/13/07 P287 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 4 Less Tnan Sipnificarn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 'ptentiauY Significant w"" Mitigation Than Signiflcant No Impact ncolppfatetl IMaCt m 8Ct EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. The project site is vacant. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on the site plan, which requires review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing or indirect lighting to avoid glare. The lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination within the project site and be compliant with foot candle limits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev. 3/13/07 P288 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptenuanr $ipnilicent wile Mitigation Tnan Significant No Imoact Incorporatetl Irtpacl Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project is located at the confluence of the Eastbound 1-210 and Southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin, and to east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. The nearest agricultural use, asmall- scale nursery, is located more than 1/2 mile southwest from the from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 P289 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 vplapuauY $ipnilicant w¢n Mitigation Tnap Significant No Impact Incomoraretl Imoact Impact 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () (/) ( ) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () (/) ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aproject-specific basis. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 methodology to evaluate construction and operational emissions. As shown in Table 8, the unmitigated emissions associated with construction of the project are below the regional significance thresholds. For operational impacts, a daily trip rate of 38.37 trips per acre was applied to the project site, resulting in 136 average daily vehicle trips. With an estimated trip length of 9 miles, this equates to 1,221 vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Table 10 indicates that the unmitigated emissions associated with the operation of the project are below the regional significance thresholds. Rev. 3/13/07 P290 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 7 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources: PP 9 ?ptanuany Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Inromaratetl Impact Impact TABLE 8 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction AdiviTy ROG NOx CO SDi PM-10 Total PM-10 Equip. Exh. PM-10 Dust PM-2.5 Grading (2008) 3,6 28.1 14.8 0.0 19.0 1.4 17.6 5.0 Assembly& finish (2009) 23.0 31,4 27.2 0.0 2.2 2.11 0,1 2.0 SCAQt<4D Threshold 76. 100. 550. 150. 150. -- -- 55. muuu es euv cruclc miles o1 ouuaing matenal aepvery per day TABLE 10 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) Source 0.0G NOx CO 60X PM-10 PM~2.5 Operational Nehide) Emission Estimates t,0 7.6 13.3 D.0 2.1 - 0.4 Area Source Emission Estimates` 7 6 7.6 14.9 0.0 2.1 0.4 Total: Operational + Area 2.6 3.1 28.2 0.0 q.2 O.g SCAOMD Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold p) No No Na No No Na %of Threshold 4.8% 5.6% 5.1% 0.0% 2.8% 1.6% "Energy consumption, landscape maintenance, etc Source: URBEMIS2007 Air quality Nodel; Output in Appendix. Rev. 3/13/07 P291 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppremialiy significam With Mifiparion Tian Significant No Imaad Inco orated Impact Irtgad In addition, localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were adopted by the SCAQMD in 2005. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to exceeding one of the most stringent federal or state ambient air quality standards at the nearest receptor. LSTs are set based on ambient concentrations in the project area, and the distance to the closest sensitive receptors. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. The URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality impact study includes a localized analysis. Local construction emissions are shown in Table 9. As Table 9 illustrates, the mitigated emissions associated with the construction of the project are below the localized significance thresholds. TABLE 9 LST Pollutantr Concentration Data for Constructions (pounds/day) Central San Bernardino Valley' CO NO, PM-10 PM-2.5 LST Threshold 1,188 258 14 6 Proposed Project 15-27 28-31 2d3 -- 2e - ' Disturbance area oft ame ' Referenced station -Northwest San eemardino Valley (37.) at 50 meters from prgen site ~ With mitigation Therefore, as required by the SCAQMD, an URBEMIS 2007 study was performed to calculate project emissions, and the model results indicate that construction and operational emissions of the proposed project would not be significant. The construction and operational emissions of the project are below regional and localized significance thresholds for criteria pollutants as indicated in Tables 8 and 10. With the imposition of mitigation measures; the impacts to LSTs are less-than-significant (Table 9). The full text and citation of the URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality study can be referenced at the end of the Initial Study Part II. Even though the construction emissions will be less than regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures in order to reach less-than significant levels for LSTs, and per the City's General Plan FEIR in order further reduce actual emissions: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Rev. 3/13/07 P292 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 9 Less Than $ignilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pctamiaoy Signitlcent with Mitigation Than Slqnificant No Imoact Incoryoratetl Im act I act 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time: • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water fluality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. Rev. 3/13/07 P293 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 .Page 10 Less Tnan Sipnificanf Less Issues and Su ortfn Information Sources: PP 9 Pofanfianv Sipnificent with Mitigation Then Sipnificent No Irroact Incorporated Impact Imped 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. Even though the operational emissions will be less than regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures per the City's General Plan FEIR in order to further reduce actual emissions: 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was Rev. 3/13/07 P294 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 11 Lass Then $ipnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g FDtannany Significant wan Mitigation roan Significant No mDeM IncDlpOlBlaC Irt'papl Impact ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan far which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. See also discussion, analysis and mitigation measures under b) above. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor (Etiwanda High School). Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the passibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, recreational storage vehicles and self-storage facilities do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (/) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and W ildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Rev. 3/13/07 P295 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 12 Lass Than Sipnilicarn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Fatentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Irtgad Incomoratetl Impact Irtroact' f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with a variety of land uses, including a retention basin, single-family dwelling units, and the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; however, in order to ensure that there are no impacts to special-status or sensitive species, a General Habitat Suitability Evaluation Report was prepared by Ecological Sciendes. Biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to evaluate on-site habitats and their ability to support sensitive species by walking a series of transects over portions of the site. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered or otherwise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. No special-status plant species were detected during the reconnaissance survey. There were some special status plant species that were not observed during the reconnaissance survey that have aloes-moderate to moderate opcurrence potential (Plummer's mariposa lily, Perry's'spineflower and Robinson's peppergrass). However, according to the report, none of the plant species that have been assigned a low-moderate to moderate occurrence potential have been assigned any formal state or rarity designation. If the plant species were present, development of the site would not likely result in the elimination of CEQA•significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis, according to the habitat evaluation report. No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on-site, but several species not observed during the survey have a moderate or high occurrence potential, such as loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit and desert wood rat. However, these species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered and have been removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Potential impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habit locally, neither of which would be significant, according the biologist's report. Site development would not likely eliminate significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potential), they are likely uncommon on such a small and isolated site (e.g. coastal western whiptail, San Diego horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, and Los Angeles pocket mouse). As such, development impacts would not likely constitute a significant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within Southern California or their overall range. No direct observations or evidence of Western Burrowing Owls were observed on the project site, but the occurrence potential is considered low-moderate. Although the Burrowing Owl is not protected under Federal or State endangered species acts, it is Rev. 3/13107 P296 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Paennally Sipnificenf wnn Mlfigation man Significant No Im aq Incorporetetl Im act Imoad protected under the Migratory Bird Treat Act of 1918, and the CDFG, which prohibits the take, possession or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. Since California ground squirrel burrows were observed on-site and can potentially accommodate owls, the report recommends that an owl survey be completed if the site preparation activities occur during the nesting season. According, the following mitigation measure shall be adhered to: If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologists report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. The report concludes with the following summary: Results of the General Habitat Suitability Evaluation conducted in February 2008 indicate that habitats present on the +/- 13-acre site [Phase I and Phase II) generally represent lower biological resource values based on the degree in which impacts to on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present because of development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special status-species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact designated critical habitat. The site would also not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special status species. Further, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87 acre northern parcel) was previously entitled and approved for development by the City on April 14, 2004. Fundamentally, after development of northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining 3.6-acre southern parcel (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining project site (3.6-acre southerly parcel) would be ostensibly reduced. With the incorporation of the mitigation measures listed above, the impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev. 3/13/07 P297 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 14 Less Tnan Signilicant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pmenrany Signilicant wim Mitigation Tnan Significant No Im°att Inc°r°ofatetl Impact Impact d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. It is highly unlikely that the subject site occupies an important location relative to regional wildlife movement. Also, see the discussion under b) above. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan PEIR (Section 5.11). The City of Rancho Cucamonga contacted the San Bernardino County Museum and requested that a review of the museum's database be pertormed for archaeological, historic or cultural resources. The City of Rancho Cucamonga received correspondence from Ms. Robin Laska, Assistant Center Coordinator for the museum, stating that the occurrence potential for Prehistoric Archaeological Resources, Historic Archaeological Resources, Historic Resources is Low, and the occurrence potential for Cultural Landscapes and Ethnic Resources is unknown. Accordingly, no further archaeological investigation is necessary. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) . If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Rev. 3/13/07 P298 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 15 Lass roan Significem Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pp[aniianr Significan[ wi[n Mi[iga[ion man Significant No Irtpect IncomorztaE Irtpact Irtnact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2. Also, see discussion under b) above. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Rev. 3/13/07 P299 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 16 Less Than sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g P°'enuany slpnilicam wim Mitigation Than significant No Irtpen ncomorefetl Inoact hroan • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Buried/Uncertain segment of the Red Hill Fault Red Hill Fault, passes within approximately 2 miles northwest Rev. 3/13/07 P300 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 17 Less Than $ipWicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Ppta"Wally Significant with Mitigation man $ipniticant No Impact IncarpomteC Impact rtoact of the project site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 1/2 miles to the north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 7 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 9 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: t) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,p emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible, 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,p emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3. Tujunga soil types are characterized by slow to very slow runoff, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Unprotected soil will blow, and water capacity is 4 to 5 inches. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3. Tujunga soil types are characterized by slow to very slow runoff, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Unprotected soil will blow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev. 3/13/07 P301 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 18 Less Tian Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Petentially Significant wpm Mitigation man SigNllcan; No lnpad InCOfpOla~etl ngaet !1'OdM 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Rev. 3/13/07 P3O2 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pnren,lauy Signilicanl wnh Mitigation Than Significant No Imoad Inmrporatetl Imoact Imoad Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Etiwanda High School is located approximately within a 1/4 of the project entrance and about 1/2 mile from the project site. Typically, the recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire Protection District has adopted Ordinance 39 and, by extension as cited in Ordinance 39, the 2001 California Fire Code as the governing documents by which Fire Construction Services, the plan check arm of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFD), establishes guidelines and policies. In Ordinance 39, Section 8, governs the Fire Department Access, which refers to Article 9 of the 2001 Fire Code and the RCFD Standards for Fire Department Access. Since the project includes only one point of access, approval of an alternative method from the Fire District is required in order for an exception to be granted. The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the project only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 103.1.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method, consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005. The State of California recently modified its Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps, which the City adheres to. Accordingly, the landscape palette will adhere to the planning spacing and palette requirements. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 P303 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pptenuanv Significant wm Mitigation man Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been . granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev. 3/13/07 P3O4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 21 less Tnan Sipnilicam Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 antanuanv Slgnilicanl wun Mitigation man Signilicant No Impact Incorporatetl Irrroan Irroan Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPS) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPS. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP). To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008), that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPS) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPS include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping, can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPS) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods Rev. 3/13/07 P305 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pptentially Significant wun Mitigation than Significant No Impact nCO OrdteO Impact npatl experienced in southern California; and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge. Although the Victoria basin is adjacent to the project site, the proposed project will not interfere with groundwater recharge. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, it would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 teet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, the CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage channel will not be disturbed, nor will the flow of the channel be altered. The access bridge will be an overpass that will not alter flows. Runoff from the project will be collected into catch basins, conveyed into RCP pipe, and then discharged into the concrete lined channel. The applicant will be required to obtain all necessary permits from Rev. 3/13/07 P306 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pafa"ualiy Sipnilicem wim Mitigation Than Significant No Imoact Incorooretetl Irrmact Imoect the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage channel will not be disturbed, nor will the flow of the channel be altered. The access bridge will be an overpass that will not alter flows. Runoff from the project will be collected into catch basins, conveyed into RCP pipe, and then discharged into the concrete lined channel. The applicant will be required to obtain all necessary permits from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site, and the runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A grading and drainage plan, along with a Water Quality Management Plan that identifies Best Management Practices that will reduce pollutants, must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, it is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identification of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Rev. 3/13/07 P307 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 24 Less Than ' $iBnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pp,entauy Signiricam wun Mlrganon Tnan slgnircant Np Impact InCOrppratetl Impact Impact g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. Further, no housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. All water will be captured and conveyed into storm drain facilities, ultimately connecting to the San Sevaine Drainage Channel. No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. .Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. This project is Phase II of a master- planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Flood Control/Utility Corridor. The proposed project is Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility that was approved in 2004. A concurrent application for an Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Rev. 3/13/07 P3O8 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 25 Less Than Sipnificam less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g ppieniially Slpniticant wan Mitigation Tnan Sipnilicant No Impact Inco orateh Irtpact Impact Amendment was filled by the applicant to permit recreational vehicle and self storage facilities in the Open Space District, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The General Plan identifies Open Space Districts as having "limited development potential." The location of the project at the confluence of a freeway interchange is suitable for a storage facility. As such, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses. For additional information, see also the discussion under Biological Resources, a) above. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () (/) ( ) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () (/) ( ) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The project site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan, Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1. The small size of the site (3.6 acres) and access through residential areas makes mining impractical and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery because of conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surface mining operations. Conversely, the open flood control basin to the west offers greater aggregate mining opportunities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The project site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan, Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1. The small size of the site (3.6 acres) and access through residential areas makes mining impractical and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery because of conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surface mining operations. Conversely, the open flood control basin to the west offers greater aggregate mining opportunities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Rev. 3/13/07 P309 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 26 Less Tien Sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fciantrely SigniOCam won Mitigation roan Signilicant No Im act Inco oratatl Impact Impact c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards (adjacent I-15 Freeway traffic noise) according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out; however, the proposed project is aself-storage facility and will not expose persons to long-term noise levels in excess of standards stated in the Development Code. People will only be at the site for temporary periods to load and unload personal property. Exposure to noise levels from the I-15 freeways will be short-term while personal property is loaded and unloaded, and noise will be reduced by the building wall planes. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Self-storage facilities normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed self-storage facility will not significantly increase traffic; hence the project is not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then Rev. 3/13/07 P310 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 27 Less T"an Significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 PptanGally sianniean, wnn Miliganpn Than signspa", N° Im°ac, Incur °ratetl Impact Impact construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 t/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees (on-site caretaker in Phase I); hence it will not create a demand for additional housing. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 P311 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pc~enually Significant wm Mitigation Than Signiticant No Im act Incomoratetl Impact Impact 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: a) The site, located from an access road off Victoria Street, would be served by Fire Station 176, located approximately 2 1/2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so that impacts to fire services will not occur. The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the project only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 103.1.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; and (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 1/2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the Rev. 3/13/07 P312 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 29 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g amanually Signilitant wnn Mitigation man Signilicant No (moan Incoroorztetl Impact Imoan construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which will lessen the impacts to library services. 14. RECREATION. Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the donstruction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 1/2 miles from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Rev. 3/13/07 P313 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 30 less Tnen SiBnilicent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: a°'°""ally Significant wun Mitigation rnan Significant No Impact Incomoretatl (mpatl Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result iri inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 110 average daily trips. The proposed project includes the development of a 393-unit self-storage facility. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each storage unit will generate .28 average daily vehicle trips daily. ~ As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each storage unit will generate .03 two-way peak hour trips, resulting in 12 two-way peak hour trips. In November of 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to the issuance of a building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 P314 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 31 Less Tnan Signilicant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Dorenually Significant wun Mitigation Tnan Significant No Impact Incorporatetl Im act Imoad e) The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the project only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 103.1.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method, consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; and (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency ai the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 P315 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 32 Less Then Sipnilican+ Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Po,anrally Significant with Mitigation Than Sipniticent No Im act Incorporated Impact Impaq b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2)shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections fora public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that include such subdivision. The City has determined that the project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Rev. 3/13/07 P316 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 33 less Tpan Signilican, Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pp,enuauv slgnuipan, wun Mitigaupn than sgnnican, Np Impact Incprporatetl Impact Impact g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () (/) () ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments a) The project site is located in an area developed with a variety of land uses, including a retention basin, single-family dwelling units and the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; however, in order to ensure that there are no impacts to special-status or sensitive species, a General Habitat Suitability Evaluation Report was prepared by Ecological Sciences. Biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to evaluate on-site habitats and their ability to support sensitive species by walking a series of transects over portions of the site. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered or otherwise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. No special-status plant species were detected during the reconnaissance survey. There were some special status plant species that were not observed during the reconnaissance survey that have aloes-moderate to moderate occurrence potential (Plummet's mariposa lily, Perry's spineflower and Robinson's peppergrass). However, according to the report, none of the plant species that have been assigned a low-moderate to moderate occurrence potential have been assigned any formal state or rarity designation. If the plant species were present, development of the site would not likely result in the elimination of CEQA-significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis, according to the habitat evaluation report. Rev. 3/13/07 P317 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 34 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Po,ennally Significant wun Mitipe+ion roan Significant No Impact nCOlpoletetl mpdC1 moac+ No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on-site, but several species not observed during the survey have a moderate or high occurrence potential, such as loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit and desert woodrat. However, these species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered, and have been removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Potential impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habit locally, neither of which would be significant, according to the biologist's report. Site development would not likely eliminate significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potential), they are likely uncommon on such small and isolated site (e.g. coastal western whiptail, San Diego horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse and Los Angeles pocket mouse). As such, development impacts would not likely constitute a significant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within Southern California or their overall range. No direct observations or evidence of Western Burrowing Owls were observed on the project site, but the occurrence potential is considered low-moderate. Although the Burrowing Owl is not protected under Federal or State endangered species acts, it is protected under the Migratory Bird Treat Act of 1918, and the CDFG, which prohibits the take, possession or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. Since California ground squirrel burrows were observed on-site and can potentially accommodate owls, the report recommends that an owl survey be completed if site preparation activities occur during the nesting season. According, the mitigation measure listed under Biological Resources shall be adhered to. The report concludes with the following summary: Results of the General Habitat Suitability Evaluation conducted in February of 2008 indicate that habitats present on the +/- 13-acre site [Phase I and Phase II) generally represent lower biological resources values based on the degree in which impacts to on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present because of development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special status-species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact the designated critical habitat. The site would also not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special status species. Further, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87-acre northern parcel) was previously entitled and approved for development by the City on April 14, 2004. Fundamentally, after development of northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining 3.6-acre southern parcel Rev. 3/13/07 P318 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Fmerniany Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incpr pratetl Impact Impact (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining project site (3.6-acre southerly parcel) would be ostensibly reduced. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure listed under Biological Resources above, the impact is considered less-than-significant. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev. 3/13/07 P319 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 36 (/) Water Quality Management Plan, Lockman and Associates (June, 2008) (/) General Habitat Suitability Evaluation, Ecological Sciences (April, 2008) (/) URBEMIS 2007 Study, RK Engineering Group, Inc. (May 6, 2008) (/) Response Letter from County of San Bernardino Museum for Archaeological Resources (May 13, 2008) (/) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) Rev. 3/13/07 P320 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 37 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: ~~ Date: ~/~/~O Print Name and Title: l.- • ~ Rev. 3/13/07 P321 engineering group, inc. transportation planning -traffic engineering environnusifal engineering parking studies May 06, 2008 Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Victorville, CA 92392 Subject: 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility Air Quality Impact Study Dear Mr. Mancinelli: RY. ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) has completed an air quality analysis of the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project. The proposed project is located at 13650 Victoria Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as indicated in Exhibit A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested that an air quality study be performed to address the affects of potential sources of air quality impacts from the project site to the surrounding area. The current federal and state/local air quality parameters can be found in Table 1. The attached study indicates that construction operation and dust from the project site will have the biggest impact on air quality as a result of the proposed project. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, construction emissions are not expected to exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional and local thresholds. The study also reveals that emissions as a result of operational activities associated with the proposed project are not expected to exceed SCAQMD thresholds. RK is pleased to provide this air quality analysis for the proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RK appreciates this opportunity to work with Charles Joseph Associates and looks forward to working with you on future projects. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, or would like further review, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING ~~ ~ Robert Kahn, P.E. ~~*, Principal RK: nq/RK651 1 IN:2060-2003-01 xr= p. 09, 30!09 z e '9\CIVt>. ~OQ~~ ~p CA~~' d~,l Mike Dickerson Environmental Engineer 3591 mac~~rthur boulevard, suite 310 newporf beach. caliiarnia 92fib0 tcl 919.d7d Ok109 tax 9~h4A74.090'_ ht lp ahvm»v. rkeng i nee ccom P322 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared far each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P323 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. . 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refnement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Applicant: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli, c/o Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger, Associate Planner Date: May 13, 2008 -. ~. 'Alf QUallfys .r ~ i~ ~ ~ ~" ~' ~ ~ : k~~r ~ : : -` r Y ~. ,t All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2!4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 9 w N A ,. .. .. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans q 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets. according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional, Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved BO C During A 4 parking or staging areas. construction Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. BO C During A 4 construction Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of BO C During A 4 debris, dirt or other dusty material. construction 2of9 w N ., . .. , Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that g0 C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statementthatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during BO C During A 4 first stage smog alerts. construction Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified BO C Review of plans A/C 4 engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. Encourage car pooling for construction workers. PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. CE B/C Review of A/C 2/4 planslDuring construction Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. BO C During A 4 construction Wash or sweep access points daily. BO C During A 4 construction Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic BO C During A 4 hours. construction All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All residential and commercial structures shall be g0 C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be g0 CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 3 of 9 w N m - ,. .. Biological Resources`: - _ ~ /.,-X~~«^~ - ~• If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur PD B Prior to Grading C/D 2/4 during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs orfledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. Cultural Resources 5 , ~ ~ ~''' ~ '`` If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ' Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the ,public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. 4of9 ~ w N V .. .. Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report A/D 4 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 5 of 9 w N ,. ., . -, -. ~. Geolo antl boils ~ p ~ ~' 9Y i_ ~, €~` r ~ ~ i ~i ~~'~ "~ ~^r ~'' ~'" , b, r c , r , , r i The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. , R' r i ~ ~ ~ Hydrology~and Water~Quality ~ ` ~ a49~^+ N ~ 1 =~ r~ ~ ~. x~, 1 ~ °< i~4 Y z m ~~ ~ ,`~ ~ 1 x f eF lk X•' ~.>~ x t ?n ~+a~ ~ s [ ~^ri d`a ~~ ~ r~~ _: t.. _ __,.~ _v _ . ~, ":.v~ ~ ~ u . ~ ,t ~ ~ r ,i ~ ~,u _ Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs), that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6 of 9 w N -. . - -. ~. , An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A1C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the Best Management CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Lockman and and Associates, June 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7 of 9 ~ w w 0 ~. ~. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adapted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official forcoverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit. ,,Noise ' : `. , - .r. ., ,: - _, . - .. ,: Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8 of 9 w w .. . ~. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a. m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations _esponsible'Person `:`~ R MonitoririgFrequency Metfiod.ofVenfication: '•' - j' ,. Sanctronsfi; T"`" CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD -Planning Director or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Slop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief ar designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 of 9 ~ W W N P333 3.5 ACRE SELF-ST4RACE FACILITY AIR QUALITY IMPACT STU®Y Rancho Cucamonga, Ca9ifornia ,; ,~ ~; i~ ,' ~; ::+ engineering _ group, inc. P334 3.5 ACRE SELF-STORAGE FACILITY AIR QUALITY IMPACT STUDY City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Prepared for: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Victorville, CA 92 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, iNC. 3991 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Robert Kahn, P.E. Mike Dickerson 3 ~ No.20285 ;T i Exp. 09/30/09 z * ~c F C A' May 06, 2008 RK:nq/RK651 1 1N2060-2008-01 P335 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................. .................................. 2-1 2.1 Regional Climate and Meteorology 2-1 Z.2 Ambient Air Quality 2-3 2.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards 2-4 2.2.2 Air Quality Planning 2-6 2.3 Local Air Quality 2-g 3.0 Study Method and Procedure ............................:. .................................. 3-1 3.1 URBEMIS 2007 Model 3-1 3.1.1 Construction Emissions Model 3-1 3.1.2 Operational Emissions Model 3-2 3.2 Local Significance Threshold (LST) 3-2 4.0 Future Air Quality Environment and Impacts ...... .................................. 4-1 4.1 Standards of Significance _ 4-1 4.2 Project Impact 4-3 4.3 Construction Activity Impact 4-3 4.3.1 Vehicle Emissions 4-6 4.3.2 Local Significance 4-6 4.4 Operational Emissions Impact 4-7 4.4.1 CO Hotspot 4-7 4.4.2 Green House Gas Emissions 4-8 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations ............................. .................................. 5-1 5.1 Construction Mitigation 5-1 5.1.1 Vehicle Emissions 5-1 5.1.2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control 5-1 5.1.3 Off-Site Impacts 5-2 5.2 Operation Mitigation 5-3 6.0 Conclusions ............................................................. ................................... 6-1 P336 List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map .......................................................................................................... A r Site Plan .................................................................................................................. B Tables Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards ......................................... 1 Primary Sources and Effects of Criteria Pollutants ...................................................... 2 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Plan ..................................................................... 3 Riverside County Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary - 2002-2006 ....................... 4 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ............................................................ 5 Calculated PM-10 Emissions from Construction Activity (pounds/day) ....................... 6 Construction Equipment Used for Various Phases .................................................... 7 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction ...................... 8 LST Pollutants Concentration Data for Construction (pounds/day) ............................. 9 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) ........................................... 10 Appendices URBEM152007 Computer Model Output ................................................................. A P337 1.0 Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this Air Quality Impact study for the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site is located 13650 Victoria Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown in Exhibit A. The site plan for the project was provided by CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES, Inc. and is shown in Exhibit B. The purpose of this study is to assess potential air quality impacts associated with the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project by investigating the existing meteorological and climate conditions in the project area, identifying the project related sources of potential air quality impact and predicting the future air quality impact levels. As a result of this effort, RK has prepared a list of recommended emission reduction measures, outlined in Section 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations, which should be implemented as part of the development project to reduce air quality impacts. The study evaluates the air quality impacts associated with both the construction and operation of the proposed project. The 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project site consists of approximately 3.5 acres of land that is currently vacant. The project site has a high school to the west and a residential development to the northwest. The proposed project site completion is expected to be in the Year 2010. The results of the analysis indicate that construction operation and dust from the project site will represent the principle sources of on-site air quality impacting the surrounding area. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, construction emissions are not expected to exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional and local thresholds during the buildout of the project. Localized thresholds are not expected to be exceeded during construction and operation, 1-1 P338 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-2 P339 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.7 Regional Climate and Meteorology The climate of the Rancho Cucamonga area, as with all of Southern California, is governed largely by the strength and location of the semi-permanent high pressure center over the Pacific Ocean and the moderating effects of the nearby vast oceanic heat reservoir. The Local semi-arid climatic condition is characterized by very warm summers, mild winters, and moderate rainfall. This weather pattern is at times interrupted by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana Winds. Humidity ranges between 70 percent on the Coast and 57 percent in the Eastern Basin. Unfortunately, the same climatic conditions that create this desirable Mediterranean-like climate combine to severely restrict the ability of the local atmosphere to disperse the large volumes of air pollution generated by the population and industry attracted in part by the climate. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is situated in an area where the pollutants generated in coastal portions of the Los Angeles basin undergo photochemical reactions and then move inland across the project site during the daily sea breeze cycle. Despite dramatic improvement in air quality in the local area throughout the 1980s, the project site is nevertheless, expected to continue to experience some unhealthful air quality for at least the next decade. Temperatures in the project vicinity average 75 degrees Fahrenheit annually with summer afternoons in the mid 90s and winter mornings in the mid 40s. It should also be noted that temperatures much above 100 degrees have been recorded in recent years. On average the warmest months are July and August and the coolest month is December. 2-1 P340 In contrast to the slow annual variation of temperature, precipitation is highly variable seasonally. Rainfall in the Rancho Cucamonga area averages 9 to 21 inches annually and falls from late November to early April with February yielding the greatest amount of precipitation and summers almost completely dry. Because much of the rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms, a shift in the storm track of a few hundred miles can mean the difference between a very wet year and a year with drought conditions. Winds across the project area are an important meteorological parameter because they control both the initial rate of dilution of locally generated air pollutant emissions as well as their regional trajectory. Daytime winds across Rancho Cucamonga show a daytime onshore flow from the NW averaging 6-8 mph. During the daytime, air emissions generated by urbanized coastal areas are transported eastward toward the region without generating any localized air quality Impacts. The drainage winds which move slowly across the area have some potential for localized stagnation. Fortunately, these winds have their origin in the San Gabriel Mountains where background pollution levels are low such that any localized contributions do not create any unhealthful. impacts. The wind distribution is such that nominal project-related air quality impacts occur more on a regional scale rather than in the immediate Rancho Cucamonga area. One other important wind condition may occur when a high pressure center forms over the western United States with sinking air forced seaward through local canyons and mountain passes. The air warms by compression and relative humidities drop dramatically. The dry, gusty winds from the N-NE create dust nuisance potential around areas of soil disturbance such as construction sites and sometimes create serious visibility and safety problems for vehicles on area freeways. 2-2 P341 In conjunction with the two dominant wind regimes that affect the rate and orientation of horizontal pollutant transport, there are two similarly distinct types of temperature inversions that control the vertical depth through which pollutants are mixed. The summer on-shore flow is capped by a massive dome of warm, sinking air which caps a shallow layer of cooler ocean air. These marine/subsidence inversions act like a giant lid over the basin. They allow for local mixing of emissions, but they confine the entire polluted alr mass within the basin until it escapes into the desert or along the thermal chimneys formed along heated mountain slopes. In winter, when the air near the ground cools while the air aloft remains warm, radiation inversions are formed that trap low-level emissions such as automobile exhaust near their source. As background levels of primary vehicular exhaust rise during the seaward return flow, the combination of rising non-local baseline levels plus the emissions trapped locally by these radiation inversions creates micro-scale air pollution "hot spots" near freeways, shopping centers and other traffic concentrations. Because the incoming air draining off the mountains during nocturnal radiation inversion conditions is relatively clean, the summer subsidence inversions are a far more critical factor in determining the Rancho Cucamonga area air quality than the winter time local trapping inversions. 2.2 Ambient Air Quality In order to gauge the significance of the air quality impact of the proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project, those impacts, together with existing background air quality levels, must be compared to the applicable ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect those people most susceptible to further respiratory distress such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise, called 2-3 P342 °sensitive receptors." Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Recent research has shown, however, that chronic exposure to ozone (the primary ingredient in photochemical smog) may lead to adverse respiratory health even at concentrations close to the ambient standard. 2.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards National Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) were established in 1971 for six pollution species with states retaining the option to add other pollutants, require more stringent compliance, or to include different exposure periods. The initial attainment deadline of 1977 was extended several times in air quality problem areas like Southern California. In 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a rule which extended and established a new attainment deadline for ozone for the year 2021. Because the State of California had established AAQS several years before the federal action and because of unique air quality problems introduced by the restrictive dispersion meteorology, there is considerable difference between state and national clean air standards. Those standards currently in effect in California are shown in Table 1. Sources and health effects of various pollutants are shown in Table 2. The Federal dean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 required that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) review all national AAQS in light of currently known health effects. EPA was charged with modifying existing standards or promulgating new ones where appropriate. EPA subsequently developed standards for chronic ozone exposure (8+ hours per day) and for very small diameter particulate matter {called "PM-2.5"). National AAQS were adopted on July 17, 1997. Planning and enforcement of the federal standards for PM-2.5 and for ozone (8-hour) were challenged by trucking and manufacturing organizations. In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that EPA did not require specific Z-4 P343 congressional authorization to adopt national clean air standards. The Court also ruled that health-based standards did not require preparation of acost-benefit analysis. The Court did find, however, that there was some inconsistency between existing and "new" standards in their respective attainment schedules. Such attainment-planning schedule inconsistencies centered mainly on the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA subsequently agreed to downgrade the attainment designation for a large number of communities to "non-attainment" for the 8-hour ozone standard. Because the South Coast Air Basin is still far from attaining the 1-hour federal standard, the 8-hour ozone non-attainment designation will not substantially alter the attainment planning process. The compliance deadline for the 8-hour ozone standard has been extended to 2021. Evaluation of the most recent data on the health effects of inhalation of fine particulate matter prompted the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to recommend adoption of the statewide PM-2.5 standard that is more stringent than the federal standard. This standard was adopted on June 20, 2002. The State PM-2.5 standard is more of a goal in that it does not have specific attainment planning requirements like a federal clean air standard, but only requires continued progress towards attainment. Similarly, the ARB extensively evaluated health effects of ozone exposure. Anew state standard for an 8-hour ozone exposure was adopted in April 2005, which mirrors the federal standard. The California 8-hour ozone standard of 0.07 ppm is more stringent than the federal 8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm. The state standard, however, does not have a specific attainment deadline. California air quality jurisdictions are required to make steady progress toward attaining state standards, but there are no hard deadlines or any consequences of non-attainment. As part of the same re-evaluation process, the ARB is anticipated to adopt a new annual state standard for nitrogen dioxide (N02) that is more stringent than the corresponding federal standard. 2-5 P344 Of the standards shown in Table 1, those for ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM-10) are exceeded at times iri the South Coast Air Basin. They are called "non-attainment pollutants." The CO standard is currently met in the basin, and re-designation to "attainment/maintenance" was adopted in October 2007. Because of the variations in both the regional meteorology and in area-wide differences in levels of air pollution emissions, patterns of non-attainment have strong spatial and temporal differences. 2.2.2 Air Quality Planning The Federal Clean Air Ad (1977 Amendments) required that designated agencies in any area of the nation not meeting national clean air standards must prepare a plan demonstrating the steps that would bring the area into compliance with all national standards. The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) could not meet the deadline for ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, or PM-10. In the SCAB, the agencies designated by the governor to develop regional air quality plans are the SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The two agencies first adopted an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in 1979 and revised it several times as earlier attainment forecasts were shown to be overly optimistic. The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act Amendment (CAAA) required that all states with air- sheds with "serious" or worse ozone problems submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Several amendments to the SIP have been proposed, revised and approved over the past decade. The most current regional attainment emissions forecast for ozone precursors (ROG and NOx) and for carbon monoxide (CO) is shown in Table 3. The Air Quality Management District (AQMD) adopted an updated clean air "blueprint" in August 2003. The 2003 AQMP was approved by the EPA in 2004. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) outlines the air pollution measures 2-6 P345 needed to meet federal health-based standards for ozone by 2010 and for particulates (PM-10) by 2006. Components of the 20D3 air plan include: • How the federal standard for CO will be maintained. • Control measures to further reduce emissions from business, industry and paints. • Measures to be adopted by CARB and EPA to further reduce pollution from: - Cars - Trucks - Construction equipment - Aircraft - Ships - Consumer products With re-designation of the air basin as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard, a new attainment plan was adopted in June 2007. This plan shifts most of the one-hour ozone standard attainment strategies to the 8-hour standard. As previously noted, the attainment date will "slip" from 2010 to 2021. A commercial project relates to the Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP) primarily through the -land use and growth assumptions used to forecast automotive air pollution emissions. The basin-wide AQMP is based on the designated land use for the project site contained in the local and County General Plans. The proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project represents a small increment of commercial growth. The project thus represents an increment of already planned growth. Implementation of such planned growth will not delay the timely attainment of regional clean air standards. With re-designation of the air basin as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard, preparation of a new attainment plan was required. This plan shifts most ', of the one-hour ozone standard attainment strategies to the 8-hour standard. The 2-7 P346 2007 AQMP was adopted on June 1, 2007, after extensive public review. The 2007 AQMP recognizes the interaction between photochemical processes that create both ozone and the smallest airborne particulates (PM-2.5). The 2007 AQMP is therefore a coordinated plan for both pollutants. Key emissions reductions strategies in the updated air quality plan include: , • Ultra-low emissions standards for both new and existing sources (including on- and-off-road heavy trucks, industrial and service equipment, locomotives, ships and aircraft). • Accelerated fleet turnover to achieve benefits of cleaner engines. • Reformulation of consumer products. • Modernization and technology advancements from stationary sources (refineries, power plants, etc.). 2.3 Local Air Quality The proposed project is located within an area monitored by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Existing and probable future levels of air quality around the project area can be best inferred from ambient air quality measurements conducted by SCAQMD at their various continuous monitoring stations. The nearest air quality monitoring station in relation to the project site for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, and Nitrogen Dioxide is at the Northwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station (station number 5175). The nearest air quality monitoring station for PM-10 and ultra-fine particulates (PM-2.5) is at the Southwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station (station number 5817). Data from the Southwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station was used only where data was not available from the closest monitoring station (Northwest San Bernardino Valley). These stations measure both regional pollution levels such as smog, as well as primary vehicular pollution levels near busy roadways such as carbon monoxide or nitrogen oxides. Table 4 is a 5-year summary of monitoring data for the major air 2-8 P347 pollutants compiled from these two air monitoring stations. From this data the following conclusions can be drawn: Photochemical smog (ozone) levels frequently exceed standards. The 1-hour state was violated an average of 49 days a yearin the last five years near Rancho Cucamonga. The federal 8-hour standard has been exceeded an average of 22 days a year within the last flue years. While ozohe levels are still high, they are much lower than 10 to 20 years ago. Attainment of all clean air standards in the project vicinity is not likely to occur soon, but the severity and frequency of violations is expected to continue to slowly decline during the current decade. 2. PM-10 levels have exceeded the state 24-hour standard on approximately 31.7 percent of all measurement days. The three times less stringent federal 24 hour-standard was not exceeded in the past five years. Year to year fluctuations of overall maximum 24-hour PM-10 levels seem to follow no discernable trend. 3. PM-2.5 Ultra-Fine Particulates 65 ,ug/m3 readings have exceeded the federal 24-hour PM-2.5 ambient standard an average of 1.0 percent of the days data was collected in the last five years. PM-2.5 > 35 Ng/m3 have exceeded the federal 24-hour PM-2.5 ambient standard an average of 6.5 percent of the days data was collected over the past year, as data is only available for the most recent year. 4. With the adoption of the revised lower Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Average Concentration > 0.030 ppm level, the ARB's annual standard in 2006 was exceeded by 0.001 or 3.3%. 2-9 P348 5. More localized pollutants such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, etc. are very low near the project site because background levels in San Bernardino County never exceed allowable levels. There is substantial excess dispersive capacity to accommodate localized vehicular air pollutants such as NOx or CO without any threat of violating applicable AAQS. 2-10 P349 3.0 Study Method and Procedure The air quality study analyzes potential pollutants and contaminant impacts from the project site to a sensitive receiver or receptor. The analysis methodology utilized procedures outlined in the SCAQMD 1993 "CEQA Air Quality Handbook" where appropriate. In areas where more site-specific information was available beyond the default values recommended in the handbook, they were used to supplement the AQMD- suggested input parameters. Vehicular emissions were calculated using the California Air Resources Board (ARB) URBEMIS2007 computer model 3.1 URBEMIS 2007 Model Utilizing the URBEMIS 2007 software an air quality assessment was calculated for construction and operational emissions for the project phases. The air quality study is consistent to the expected general time line for the project completion. 3.1.1 Construction Emissions Model Average daily PM-10 emissions during site grading and other disturbance are stated in the SCAQMD for projects in southern California CEQA Handbook to be 26.4 pounds per acre. Enhanced dust control procedures such as continual soil wetting, use of supplemental binders, early paving, etc. can achieve an even higher PM-10 control efficiency. Daily emissions with use of reasonably available control measures (RACMs) for PM-10 can reduce emission levels to around 10 pounds per acre per day. The default value used is 20 !bs per day. With the use of best available control measures (BACMs) the California Air Resources Board URBEM152007 computer model predicts that emissions can be reduced to 2-3 pounds per acre per day, as shown on the URBEMIS analysis printouts provided in the Appendix. 3-1 P350 3.1.2 Operational Emissions Model The project site is expected to be completed by the end of Year 2010. The project site consists of approximately 3.5 acres and will consist of aself-storage facility. A daily trip rate of 38.87 trips per acre was applied to the 3.5 Storage Facility. Accordingly, the proposed project is expected to generate 136 average daily trips (ADT) during a typical weekday. For typical San Bernardino County commercial trip lengths, approximately 9.0 miles, additional vehicle travel from project implementation will be about 1,221 vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Secondary impact potential of the project is from energy consumption in power plants or on-site heaters, stoves, water heaters, etc. General development also creates miscellaneous emissions from a variety of sources such as cleaning products or landscaping equipments, and also contributes to off-site emissions at restaurants, gas stations, dry cleaners, or sand and gravel plants. Except for more readily quantifable energy consumption (stationary sources), many of the small miscellaneous sources are typically not quantified on a single project basis. These small sources, however, are non-negligible when minute individual contributions are summed over millions of Southern California residences. They further attest to the conclusion that overall anticipated growth is a substantial impediment to the attainment of regional clean air standards. 3.2 Local Significance Threshold (LST) The SCAQMD has developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition to the more regional emissions-based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called Local Significance Thresholds {LSTs). LSTs were developed in response to Governing Board's Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative 1-4 and the LST methodology was provisionally adopted in October 2003 and formally approved by SCAQMD's Mobile Source Committee in February 2005. 3-2 P351 LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: oxides of nitrogen (NOx}, carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5). For general development projects, LSTs are generally only applicable to the construction phase. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. 3-3 P352 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3-4 P353 4.0 Future Air Quality Environment and Impacts This purpose of this study is to determine if the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project will have any air quality impacts. The potential impacts are discussed in the following section. The site consists of approximately 3.5 acres of land that is currently vacant. 4.1 Standards of Significance Many air quality impacts from dispersed mobile sources, i.e., the dominant pollution generators in the basin, often occur hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of any individual source is generally immeasurably small. The SCAQMD has therefore developed suggested significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The 1993 SCAQMD Handbook (as subsequently revised) states that any projects in the SCAB (South Coast Air Basin) with daily emissions that may exceed any of the thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. Table 5 shows the current SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Additional indicators should be used as screening criteria to evaluate the need for further analysis with respect to air quality. Whenever possible, the project should be evaluated in a quantitative analysis; otherwise a qualitative analysis is appropriate. The additional significance thresholds include whether the: • Project may interfere with the attainment of the federal or state ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation. 4-1 P354 • Project may result in population increases within the regional statistical area which would be in excess of that projected in the AQMP. • Project may generate vehicle trips that became a CO hot spot. • Project might have the potential to create or be subjected td objectionable odors. • Project may have hazardous materials on-site and could result in an accidental release of air toxic emissions. • Project may involve disposal of hazardous waste • Project may involve being occupied by sensitive receptors near a facility that emits air toxics or near CO hot spots. • Project may emit carcinogenic air contaminants that may pose a cancer risk. The project site is located directly adjacent to the SR-15 Freeway. CO emissions from the adjacent freeway will supersede any emissions from the project site. A CALINE 4 model which is utilized to identify the impact of CO "hot spots" is not needed because the of the location of the project site relative to the adjacent freeway and meets the SCAQMD CEQA criteria. Temporary emissions during construction and regional mobile source emissions from trips generated by mini warehouse buildings are the only credible sources of potential air quality impact. The vehicle trips produced by the project site are insignificant when compared to the adjacent SR-15 Freeway. 4.2 Project Impact Intensification of land uses in San Bernardino County potentially impacts ambient air quality on two scales of motion. Regionally, as vehicles drive throughout Southern California, the small incremental contribution to the basin air pollution burden from any single vehicle is added to that from several million other vehicles. The impact from this project, even if it generates a significant number of new vehicle trips, is 4-2 P355 very small on a regional scale. Basin-wide air quality impacts are, therefore, addressed in terms of project compatibility with regional air quality plans. If any given project or plan has been properly incorporated into basin-wide growth projections which are the basis for regional air quality/transportation planning, then the basin-wide impact of any proposed development is presumed, by definition, to be less-than-significant. Locally, changes in the location of any collection of automotive sources, or changes in the number of vehicles or travel speeds may impact the micro-scale air quality around any given development site. Traffic increases not only contribute air pollutants in .direct proportion to their cumulative percentage of traffic volume growth, but they may slow all existing traffic to slower, more inefficient travel speeds. However, cars are becoming "clean" which is lowering emission levels and lowering the amount of local air pollution "hot spats." 4.3 Construction Activity Impact Temporary construction activity emissions will occur during project build-out. Such emissions include on-site generation of dust and equipment exhaust, and off-site emissions from construction employee commuting and/or trucks delivering building materials. Because of their temporary nature, air quality impacts from construction have often been considered as individually less-than-significant. Also, construction activity emissions are difficult to quantify, since the exact type and amount of equipment that will be used or the acreage that may be disturbed on any given day in the future is not known with any reasonable certainty. The emphasis in environmental documents relative to construction activity emission impacts has therefore been to minimize the emissions as fully as possible through comprehensive mitigation even if the exact amount of emissions cannot be precisely quantified. 4-3 P356 Short-term construction impacts may be generated by soil disturbance and equipment exhaust. Dust is normally the primary concern during construction of new buildings and infrastructure. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions." Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). Regulatory agencies typically use one universal factor based on the area disturbed assuming that all other input parameters into emission rate prediction fall into mid-range average values. This assumption may or may not necessarily be applicable to site-specific conditions on the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project site. Emissions estimates for project-specific fugitive dust sources are therefore characterized by a considerable degree of imprecision. The entire project site occupies approximately 3.5 acres. The entire site will not be under simultaneous disturbance. The California Air Resources Board (GARB) emissions computer model URBEM152007 shows that average daily grading disturbance "footprint" for the proposed use will be approximately 0.88 acres. Calculated PM-10 emissions with the application of "standard" dust control, and with the application of enhanced dust control measures are shown in Table 6. PM-10 emissions will be below the PM-10 significance thresholds with the use of "standard" dust control measures. However, because the basin is non-attainment for PM-10, use of best available control measures (BACMs} for dust is nevertheless required. Current research in particulate exposure health effects suggests that the most adverse effect derives from ultra-small diameter particulate matter comprised of chemically reactive pollutants such as sulfates, nitrates or organic material. A national clean air standard for particulate matter of 2.5 microns or smaller in diameter (called "PM-Z.5") was adopted in 1997. Very little construction activity 4-4 P357 particulate matter is in the PM-2.5 range. Soil dust is also more chemically benign than typical urban atmospheric PM-2.5. In addition to fine particles that remain suspended in the atmosphere semi- indefinitely, construction activities generate many larger particles with shorter atmospheric residence times. This dust is comprised mainly of large diameter inert silicates that are chemically non-reactive and are further readily filtered out by human breathing passages. These fugitive dust particles are therefore more a potential soiling nuisance as they settle out on parked cars, outdoor furniture, or landscape foliage than they are an adverse health hazard. Any dust nuisance potential will be minimized, however, by a combination of mandatory control programs and the relatively short dust deposition distance (<100 feet) for large- dust particles. During Santa Ana wind conditions, large particles can be carried much farther, typically from NW to SW. During these conditions, sensitive receivers (high school) are located in the approximate downwind direction; however, the creation of visible dust plumes from disturbed soil is prohibited by SCAQMD Rule 403. Provisions for enhanced dust control must be made for occasional Santa Ana wind conditions. Construction activity air quality.impacts occur mainly in close proximity to individual disturbance areas. However, there may be some "spill-over" into the surrounding community. That spill-over may be physical as vehicles drop or carry out dirt or silt is washed into public streets, Passing non-project vehicles then pulverize the dirt to create off-site dust impacts. Spill-over may also occur through congestion effects. Construction may entail roadway encroachment, detours, land closures and competition between construction vehicles (trucks and contractor employee commuting) and ambient traffic for available roadway capacity. Emissions controls require good housekeeping procedures and a construction traffic management plan that maintains such "spill-over" effects at aless-than-significant level. 4-5 P358 4.3.1 Vehicle Emissions Exhaust emissions will result from on- and off-site heavy equipment during grading. Emissions will also be generated during finish construction, especially during the application of paints or other coatings. The types and numbers of equipment will vary among contractors such that such emissions cannot be quantified with certainty. The assumed equipment for various phases of construction is shown in Table 7. The ARB's URBEMi52007 computer model was used to estimate maximum daily emissions during various phases of construction, including construction worker commuting emissions. The results (pound/day) and are shown in Table 8. Construction equipment will emit diesel particulate matter (DPM) that is a known carcinogen. The cancer risk associated with such exposure is based on a 70-year, 365 day/year, 24 hour/day outdoor exposure. Grading will occur for approximately 1 month. It is important to note that grading will only occur during weekday working hours over the course of several years, rather than non-stop for 70 years. The closest populations exposed to potential construction activity DPM residential uses northwest of the site. Residences are often unoccupied during the construction work-day, and exterior residential uses are limited in duration compared to the 24/hour per day assumption. Any public health risk from construction equipment DPM exposure is insignificant based upon exposure duration and intensity. 4.3.2 Local Significance The average daily grading disturbance "footprint" for will be 0.88 acres. LST pollutant concentration data for construction on a 1 acre disturbed site is referenced from the SQAMD 2005 Thresholds for Construction. The data represents the appropriate Source Receptor Area (Northwest San Bernardino Valley) for 1-acre, 4-6 P359 2-acre, and 5-acre sites for asource-receptor distance of 50 meters to any sensitive receptors near the site. Table 9 indicates that all mitigated emissions are below LST thresholds during project construction. 4.4 Operational Emissions Impact The California ARB land use and air pollution emissions URBEMIS2007 computer model was run for a year 2010 project build-out. The project-related vehicular emissions burden is shown in Table 10. An increase in emissions will occur based on the land use type, however, the project operation thresholds will not be exceeded for any of the pollutants analyzed. In addition to regional air quality concerns which focus on the photochemical conversion of air pollution emissions to more harmful forms, vehicular exhaust may impact air quality immediately adjacent to the roadway travel lanes. Such micro- scale carbon monoxide (CO) impacts occur during periods of maximum traffic congestion and minimum atmospheric dispersion. 4.4.1 CO Hotspot Micro-scale air quality is traditionally analyzed within environmental studies in terms of any potential CO "hot spots." Hot spots are possible violations of standards at sensitive receptor locations within very short distances of major intersections or other points of traffic stagnation. Such an analysis is not necessary for the proposed project because: 1. Background CO levels are low in San Bernardino County. 2. The average CO emissions per vehicle will decrease by more than 50 percent in this next decade such that it becomes physically impossible to create enough of a vehicle concentration to generate enough CO emissions to exceed standards. 4-7 P360 3. The background CO levels are currently 1.8 ppm. It would take an increase of +18.2 ppm to exceed the current 1-hour standard of 20 ppm. CO modeling by the SCAQMD has shown that the worst-case CO impact at the largest intersection in the air basin operating at a level of service "F" is much less than 18 ppm. Any local CO impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be much less than the worst-case basin-wide location. 4. CO emissions from the adjacent freeway will supersede any emissions from the project site. 4.4.2 Green House Gas Emissions Construction equipment will generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions possibly associated with currently observed global warming. California has adopted several initiatives to reduce GHG emissions from combustion sources. Obviously, no single project or jurisdiction generates enough GHG to impact global climate. However, the cumulative impact of all combustion of fossil fuels may have global implications. Use of modern diesel engines, required to mitigate NOx impacts, will have a small GHG emissions reduction benefit from increased combustion efficiency. In the absence of any GHG thresholds of emissions significance or methodology to analyze such impacts, the use of maximally efficient diesel-fueled equipment is believed to mitigate any cumulative GHG impacts as much as is practical. 4-8 P361 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations 5.1 Construction Mitigation Recommended emissions reduction measures for construction activities are outlined in the sections below. If implemented as part of the proposed project, these measures will yield a reduction in air quality impacts associated with the development. 5.1.1 Vehicle Emissions As described in Section 4.3, construction of the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project will have a less than significant impact from equipment emissions on air quality from heavy construction equipment and vehicles. The following measures are recommended to reduce impact during project construction. • Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. • Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. • Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. • All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. • Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. 5.1.2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading. The menu of enhanced dust control measures includes the following: 5-1 P362 • Water all active construction areas three times daily. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved•parking or staging areas. • Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. • Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed Z5 mph. • Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing is completed. 5.1.3 Off-Site Impacts Based on the description of the proposed project, the following are recommendations to help reduce the potential air quality impact to the surrounding community. These recommendations can help further mitigate the potential impact to daily construction activities. • Encourage car pooling for construction workers. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. • Wash or sweep access points daily. • Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. • Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. • The project should participate in any City adopted Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs. 5-2 P363 5.2 Operation Mitigation Operational emissions and maintenance activities will not exceed adopted significance thresholds. • Estimated peak day emissions of CO, ROG, NOx, and SOx do not exceed the SCAQMD operation thresholds. The impact would therefore be less significant. • Estimated peak day emissions of PM-10 do not exceed the SCAQMD operation threshold. The impact would therefore be less significant. • Estimated peak day emissions of PM-2.5 do not exceed the SCAQMD operation threshold. The impact would therefore be less significant. 5-3 P365 6.0 Conclusions This air quality analysis assesses the potential air quality impacts and necessary mitigation measures for the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project. The project site is located at 13650 Victoria Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown in Exhibit A. The site plan used for this analysis was provided by CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES, Inc., and is presented in Exhibit B. The results of the analysis indicate that construction operation and dust from the project site will represent the principle sources of on-site air quality impacting the surrounding area. The following conclusions for the project are listed below: • The project-related short construction emissions along with the SCAQMD thresholds are shown in Table 8. Short-term construction impacts are below the SCAQMD thresholds and are considered less than significant. • The local significance emissions for construction along with the localized significance thresholds (LST) are indicated in Table 9. All LST's pollutants are below the thresholds after the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. • The project-related long-term emissions along with the SCAQMD thresholds are indicated in Table 10. All emission levels are below the SCAQMD thresholds and are considered not significant. A detailed list of necessary air quality mitigation measures is presented in Section S.0 Mitigation Recommendations. The air quality mitigation analysis and recommendations are intended to satisfy the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) standards with respect to this project. 6-1 P366 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6-2 P367 Exhibits P368 Exhibit A Location Map 2°ba~-°~«,^~ engineering 3S ACRE SELF-STOPAGE FAQLT'AIR QUAL(TY IMPACT STUDY, Rancho Cuonicnp, Czli(omia group, inc. P369 Exhibit B Site Plan ~~ suso.u~o~cEaa~ engineering 35 ACRE SELF-STORAGE FACILfiY AIRQUALffY IMPACT STUDY, Rancho C~wnongr, Cali(omia group, mc. P369 Exhibit B Site Plan ~~ ~aa~.o~~~ engineering 3S ACRE SELF-STORAGE FACILffYAIRQUALfTYlMPACT STUDY, Rancho Cucamonga, CalKamia ryr~~n! InC~ P370 Tables P371 TABLE 1 Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Average National Standards California Major Pollutant Sources Time Standards Ozone (03) 1-hr No Federal Standard 0.09 ppm 8-hr 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm Motor Vehicles, paints, coatin s, and solvents. Carbon Monoxide 1-hr 35.0 ppm 20.0 ppm Internal combustion engines, (CO) 8-hr 9.0 ppm 9.0 ppm primarily gasoline powered _-.-_ motor vehicles Nitrogen Dioxide (NOz) Annual Avg 0.05 ppm _ 0.03 ppm Motor vehicles, petroleum- refining operations, industrial 1-hr No Federal Standard 18 m sources, aircraft, shi s, and Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) _ _ Annual Avg _ 0.03 ppm - - Fuel combustion, chemical 1-hr No Federal Standard 0.25 ppm plants, sulfur recovery plants, 24-hr 0.14 ppm 0.04 ppm and metal rocessing. Lead (Pb) Monthly - - 1.5 Ng/ma Present source: Lead smelters, battery manufacturing and retycling facilities. Quarterly 1 5 u9/ma - Past source: Combustion of leaded asoline Particulate Matter _ _ Annual Avg _ No Federal Standard 2pug/ma Dust and fume-producing (PMt~ construction, industrial and agricultural operations, 24-hr 150Yg/ma SOkg/m' combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (i.e., wind raised dust and oceans rays). _ Particulate Matter Annual Avg -_ 15yg/n-~3 72Ng/m3 Dust and fume-producing (PMz.~ construction, industrial and agricultural operations, 24-hr 35 ~g/m3 _ - combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (i.e., wind raised dust and oceans ravs . ppm =parts per million pg/ma =micrograms per cubic meter Source: South Coast Air Quality Management DistriR j:rktables/8K667778 1N2060-2008-07 P372 TABLE 2 Primary Sources and Effects of Criteria Pollutants ry (Lead (Pb) (Sulfur dioxide (SOi) t Monoxide (CO) Dioxide (NO2) zone (Oaj ._ __'. ..- Particulate Maiter i0) Combustion of sulfur- containing fossil fuels Smelting of sulfur-bearing metal ores Industrial Process Incomplete combustion of fuels and other carbon- containing substances, such as motor vehicle exhaust Natural events, such as decomposition of orgainc matter Motor vehicle exhaust High- temperature stationary combustion Atmospheric reactions iospheric reaction of anic gases with nitrogen ies in sunlight >nary combustion of fuels Construction Process uric chemical Impairment of blood ft and nerve construction Behavioral and hearing problems in children Aggravation of respirtory diseases (asthma, emphysema) Reduced lung function I«itation of eyes Reduced visibility Plant injury Deterioration of metals, textiles, leather, finishes, coating, e±c. Reduced tolerance for exercise Impairment of metal function Impairment of fetal development Death at high levels of exposure Aggravation of some heart diseases (angina) Aggravation of respiratory ilness Reduces visibility Reduced plant growth Formation of acid rain Aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases Irritation of eyes Impairment of cardiopulmonary Plant leaf injury Reduced lung function Aggravation of the effects of gaseous pollutants Aggravation of respiratory and cardiorespiratorydiseoses Increased cough and chest discomfort Soiling Reduced visibility j: rktableslRK651 1 T8 JN:2060-2008-07 P373 TABLE 3 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Plan (Emissions in tons/day) ROG NOx CO Current Inventaryt Stationary On-Road Mobile Off-Road Mobile 304 276 131 103 581 286 246 2,705 1,003 TOTAL 710 970 3,953 2010 ForecastZ Stationary On-Road Mobile -- Off-Road Mobile 296 212 122 89 434 - 257 217 2,048 - 1,094 TOTAL 630 780 3,359 2020 Forecastz Stationary On-Road Mobile Off-Road Mobile 340 130 114 90 206 241 234 1,097 1,104 TOTAL 584 537 2,435 ' 2005 Base Year. ~ With current emissions reduction programs and adopted growth forecasts. Source: California Air Resources Board, the 2005 California Almanac of Emission & Air Quality j: rktables/RK657 iT8 IN:2060-2008-01 P374 TABLE 4 Riverside County Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary - 2002-2006 (Days Standards Were Exceeded and Maximum Observed Levels) Pollutant/Standard 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Ozone 1-Hour > 0.09 ppm (5) 36 48 31 34 50 1-Hour > 0.12 ppm (F) 5 15 2 8 14 8-Hour > O.D7 ppm (S) -- -- 31 34 54 B-Hour > 0.08 ppm (F) 19 35 1 B 15 25 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.134 0.155 0.138 0.149 0.17 Carbon Monoxide i -Hour > Z0. ppm (S) 0 0 0 0 0 8- Hour> 9. ppm (S, F) 0 0 0 D 0 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 4 4 3 3 3 Max 8-Hour Con[. (ppm) 1.6 2.9 2.1 1.8 1.8 Nitrogen Dioxide 1-Hour > 0.18 ppm (S) 0 0 D 0 0 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.1 D Annual Ave AAM Conc> 0.030 (ppm) -- ~ ~~~ -- -' ~~ -- 0.0310 PM-10 24-Hour > SO,uy/m'(S) 25/61 18/62 17/58 19/60 17/62 24-Hour> 750Ng/m3(F) .. ...._ 0/61 _.. 0/62 0/58 0/60 0/6Z 3 Max. 24-Flour Conc. (uy/m) 91 749 - ___ 93 74 __.. __. 78 Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM-2.6) 24-Hour > 65 pg/m3 (F) 0/11 3/118 2/112 1/1 10 0/107 24-Hour > 35 Ng/ma (F) - - - - - - - - 7/107 Max. Z4-Hour Conc. (ug/m3) 64.6 88.9 86.1 87.8 53.7 Source: Northwest San Bernardino Valley (5175): Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide Southwest San Bernardino Valley (5817): PM-1 D, Ultra-fine Particulates (PM-2.S) j: rktables/RK6511T8 IN2060-2008-07 P375 TABLE 5 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds Mass Dail Thresholds' Pollutant ConstructionZ Operation' Nox 1001bs/da SS lbs/da VOC 75 Ibs/day __ 55 Ibs/da _ _ PM10 150 1bs/day 150 1bs/da r~__ PM2.5 551bs/day - 551bs/day Sox _ . ------_- _ -- 150 Ib~/da ----------....X------- _ _ ___ - -- 150 Ibs/da ---~-- __--- CO SSOIbslday __ 5501bs/day Lead 3 Ibs/day _ 3 Ibs/day ' Source : SCAQMD CEQA HandbooY. (SCAQMD, 1993) 2 Construction thresholds apply to both the South Coast Air Basin and Coadrella Valley (Salton Sea and Mojave Desert Air Basins). 3 For Coachella Valley, the mass daily thresholds for operation are the same as the construction ihrezholds j:VktablesViK6611TB lN:2060-2008-01 P376 TABLE 6 Calculated PM-10 Emissions From Construction Activity (poundsJday) Average Daily With Reasonably Grading With Minimum Dust Available Control With Best Available Disturbance Area Control Measures Control Measures 1 Acres 7 9.0 10.0 3.3 j:hktables/RK65i i r8 1N:1060-2008-01 P377 TABLE 7 Construction Equipment Used for Various Phases Grading Assembly Finish Grader (1) Forklift (2) Paver (t) 8ackhoe (t) Backhoe(t) Backhoe(1) Dozer (1) Crane (1) Roller (1) 1NaterTruck (1) -- Cement Mix (4) j: rktables/RK65 ] 7T8 IN:2060-2008-01 P378 TABLE 8 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction Activity ROG N0, CO SOz PM-10 Total PM-10 Equip. Exh. PM-10 Dust pM-2.5 Grading (2008) 3.6 28.1 14.8 0.0 19.0 1.4 17.6 5.0 Assembly & Finish (2009) 23.0 31.4 27.2 0.0 2.2 2.11 0.1 2.0 SCAQMD Threshold 76. 100. 550. 150. 150. -- -- 55. * Includes 200 truck miles of building material delivery per day %:rk[ableslRK6577TB 1N:2060-2008-07 P379 TABLE 9 LST Pollutants Concentration Data for Construction (poundslday) Central San Bernardino Valleyz CO NOx PM-10 PM-2.5 LST Threshold 1,188 258 14 6 Proposed Project 15.27 28-31 2.33 23 ~ Disturbance area of 1 acre ' Referenced station -Northwest San Bernardino Valley (32) at 50 meters from project site 3 With mitigation j:/rkta6les/RK661178 IN:2060-2008-01 P380 TABLE 10 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) Source ROG NOx CO SOx PM-10 PM-2.5 Operational (Vehicle) Emission Estimates 1 0 1.5 13.3 0.0 2.1 0.4 Area Source Emission . Estimates' 1 6 1.6 14,9 0.0 2.1 0.4 Total: Operational + Area 2.6 3.1 28.2 0.0 4.2 0.6 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold (7) No No No No No No %ofThreshold 4.8% 6.6% 6.1% 0.0°h 2.8% 1,5% * Energy consumption, landscape maintenance, etc Source: URBEMIS2007 Air Quality Model; Output in Appendix. I; rkrab/es/RK6511 iB IN:2060-2008-01 P381 Appendices P382 Appendix A URBEMIS2007 Computer Model Output Page: 1 5l1 /2008 11:41:38 AM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: C:lDocuments and Settings\mdickerson\Desktop\20600801_Model.urb924 Project Name: 2060-2008-01 3.5 Acre Self Stroage Facility Air Quality Project location: South Coast AOMD On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac20D7 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 W aD W Page:2 5!112008 11:41:38 AM Summary Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NQti ~ ,gQZ PM70 Dust p M10 Exhaust PM70 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 PM2 5 EXliaust . 2008 TOTALS (ibslday unmlligaled) 3.35 28.07 14.77 0.00 17.61 1.41 19.02 3.68 1.30 4.98 2008 TOTALS (Ibs/day mitigated) 3.35 28.07 14.77 0.00 1.89 1.41 3.30 0.40 1.30 1.70 2009 TOTALS (Ibs/day unmitigated) 22.99 31.37 27.20 0.02 0.10 2,11 2.20 0.03 1.93 1.97 2009 TOTALS (Ibs/day mitigated) 22.99 31.37 2720 0.02 0.10 2.11 2.20 0.03 1.93 1.97 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NQX CQ .~42 PM70 PM2.5 &42 TOTALS (Ibs/tlay, unmitigated) 0.58 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx GO 802 PM10 PM25 ~_ TOTALS (Ibslday, unmitigated) 1.03 1.54 13.30 0.01 2.11 0.41 1,255.10 SUM OF AREA SOURCE ANO OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG ~ CLQ ~ PM70 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (Ibslday, unmitigated) 1.61 1.56 14.90 0.01 2.11 0.41 1,257.85 Constmction Unmitigatetl Detail Report: CONSTRUCT{ON EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated ROG NOx CO 502 PM70 Dusl PM70 Exhaust PM70 PM2.5 Dust pM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 X43 2,371.80 2,371.80 4,269.34 4,269.34 ~~ W A Page: 3 511/2008 11:41:38 AM Time Slice 1113/2008-12/31/2008 ;ice 28.07 1a.n g,pQ 17_61 ]_Ql .02 ~§ ~ ¢gg 3Z,_7L_~ Active Days: 43 Mass Grading 11/032008- 3.35 28.07 14.77 0.00 17.61 1.41 19.02 3.68 1.30 4.98 2,371.80 12/31 /2008 Mass Grading Dust 0.00 0.00' 0.00 0.00 17.60 0.00 17.60 3.68 0.00 3.68 0.00 Mass Grading Off Road Diesel 3.31 2B oD 13.56 0.00 0.00 1.47 1.41 0.00 1.30 1.30 2,247.32 Mass Grading On Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mass Grading Worker Trips 0.04 0.07 1.21 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.49 Time Slice 122009-227/2009 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 Active Days: 41 Building 01!02/2009-06!302009 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 Building OH Road Diesel 1.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.58 0.58 893.39 Building Vendor Tnps O.fiB 8.22 5.68 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1,324.12 Building Worker Trips 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 79fi.77 Time Slice 322009-4/302009 20.78 18.45 18.08 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.09 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,041.22 Active Days: 44 Building 01/02/2009-06/302009 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.06 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 Bullding ON Road Diesel 1.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.58 0.58 893.39 Building Vendor Tdps 0.68 8.22 5.68 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1,324.12 euiltling Worker Trips 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 796.77 Coating 03/0112009-06/30/2009 18.56 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 Architectural Coating 18.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Wod<er Trips 0.01 0.01 0-24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 26.95 W W (11 Page:4 51112008 11:41:38 AM Time Slice 5/1/2009-6/3072009 22.99 31.37 27.20 0.02 Q 10 2,]1 2.ZS2 X03 ], g~7 ].H Z 4.289.34 Active Deys: 43 , Asphalt 05/01/2009-06/3012009 2.22 12.92 9.12 0.00 0.01 1.10 1.11 0.00 1.01 1.02 1,228.12 Paving OH-Gas 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 00 Road Diesel 2.08 12.55 7.05 0.00 0.00 1.09 1.09 0.00 1.00 1.00 979.23 Paving On Road Diesel 0.02 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 O.Ot 0.00 0.01 0.01 31.14 Paving Worker Trips 0.06 0.12 1.97 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 217,75 Building 01102/2009-0673012009 2.21 18.44 17.64 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 Building OH Road Diesel ~ 1.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 D.00 0.58 0.58 893.39 Building Vendor Trips 0.68 8.22 5.68 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1,324.12 Building WarkerTrips 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 796.77 Coating 03/01/2009-06/302009 18.56 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 Architectural Coating 18.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Worker Trips 001 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 Phase Assumptions Phase: Mass Gratling 11/32008 - 12/31/2008 -Default Mass Site Grading/Fxcavatfon Description Total Acres Disturbed: 3.5 Maximum Daily Acreage Disturbed: 0.88 FugiOve Dus[ Leval of DetaiC Default - 201bs per acre-0ay On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Graders (174 hp) operating a[ a 0.61 load factor for 6 hours per day 1 Ruhher Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 6 hours per day 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 Water Trucks (189 hp) operating at a 0.5 load factor for 8 hours per day W 07 Page: 5 5/1/2008 11:41:38 AM Phase: Paving 5/1/2009 - 6/30/2009 -Default Paving Description Acres to be Paved: 0.88 Oft-Road Equipment: 4 Cement antl Mortar Mixers (10 hp) operating al a 0.56 load factorfor 6 hours per day 'i Pavers (100 hp) operatng at a 0.621oad factor for 7 hours per day 1 Rollers (95 lip) operating at a 0.56 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 TraUOrs/Lcaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating al a 0.55 loatl factor fOr 7 hours per day Phase: Building Construction 1/2/2009 - fi/30/2009 -Default Building ConslruUion Description Off-Road Equipment: 1 Cranes (399 hp) operating al a 0.43 load factor for 4 hours per day 2 Forklifts (145 hp) operating at a 0.3 load factor for 6 hours per day 1 Tradors/Loaders/Backhoes (708 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per tlay Phase: Architectural Coating 3/1 /2009 - 6!3012009 -Default Architectural Coating Description Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Residential Infector Coatings begins 7/12008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 50 Rule: Resitlential Exterior Coatings begins 1/7/2005 ends 6/302008 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Resitlential Eztedor Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOG of 250 Rule: Nonresitlential Fxtedor Coatings begins 1!1/2005 ends 12/37/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 ConsWdion Mitigated Detail Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pountls Per Day, Midgaled tF C7G t~ CO ~O1 PM70 Dust PM10 Fyhaust ~Q PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 C02 W tb V Page: 6 5N /2088 11:41:38 AM Time Sllce 11/3/2008-12/31/2008 ActNe Days: 43 Mass Grading 11/032008- 12l31/2008 Mass Grading Dust Mass Grading Of( Road Diesel Mass Grading On Road Diesel Mass Grading Worker Trips Time Slice 1/2/2009-2/27!2009 Active Days: 41 Building 01/0212009-06/30/2009 Building Off Road Diesel Building Vendor Trips Builtling Worker Trips , Time Slice 322009-4(.1012009 Alive Days: 44 Building 01/02/20040fi/30/2009 Building Off Road Diesel Building Vendor Trips Building Worker Trips Coating 03/01/2009-06/302009 Archkeclural Coating Coating Worker Trips 3.3,`1 28,07 77 904 ],¢g ]g], ~ 040 ~0 ~ 7180 3.35 28.07 14.77 0.00 1.89 1.41 3.30 0.40 1.30 1.70 2,371.8D 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 1.88 0.00 1.88 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00 3.37 28.00 13.56 0.00 0.00 1.41 1.41 0.00 1.30 1.30 2,247.32 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 121 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 D.00 0.00 0.00 124.49 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 1.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 D.63 0.63 0.00 0.58 0.58 893.39 0.68 8.22 5.68 0.07 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1,324.12 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 79fi.77 20.78 16.45 10.08 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.09 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,041.22 2.27 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 7.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 1.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.58 0.58 093.39 0.68 8.22 5,68 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1,324.12 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 796.77 18.56 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 18.56 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 o.2a o.oD o.oo o.oD o.oa o.DO o.DD o.oo zs.ss w Page: 7 511/2008 1 V41:39 AM Time Slice 511/2009-6!30/2009 22.99 31.37 27_20 ~gy 4,].4 rte]]. 2.24 4.41 1,93 ~ 2 9 ~ Active Days: 43 Asphalt 05/0112009-06/302009 2.22 72.92 9.12 0.00 0.01 1.10 1.11 0.00 1.01 1.02 1,228.12 Pavng Oft-Gas 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Off Road Diesel 2.08 12.55 7.05 0.00 0.00 1.09 1.09 0.00 1.00 1.00 979.23 Paving On Road Diesel 0,02 0.25 0.10 0.00 O.OD 0.01 0.01 0.00 0-01 0.01 31.74 Paving Worker Trips 0.06 0.72 1.97 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 277.75 Building 01102/2009-06/302009 2.21 18.44 17.84 0.02 0.08 1.00 1.08 0.03 0.92 0.95 3,014.28 Building Off Roatl Diesel 7.30 9.79 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.58 0.58 893.39 Building Vendor Trips 0.68 6.22 5.68 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.32 0.33 1324.12 Building Wacker Trips 0.23 0.43 7.22 0.07 0.04 0.02 0-06 0.01 0.02 0.03 796.77 CoaOng 03/012009-06/302009 18.56 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 Architectural Coating 18.5fi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating WorkerTdps 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.95 Gonstact'v R lated Mtioat' Measure= The following mitigation measures apply to Phase: Mass Grading 11/3/2008 - 12/312008 -Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description For Soil Stabling Measures, the Apply soil stabilaers to inactive areas mitigation reduces emissions by: PM70: 84%PM25: 84°h For Soil Stablaing Measures, the Replace ground rover in disturbed areas quickly mitigation retluces emissions by: PM70: 5% PM25: 5% For Soil Slablizing Measures, the Wa[er exposed surfaces 2x daily watering mitigation educes emissions by: PM70: 55% PM25: 55°h For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph mitigation reduces emissions by: PM70: 44%PM25: 44% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Manage haul road dust 2x daily watedng mitigation retluces emissions by: PM10: 55°/ PM25: 55°h W Page:B 511/2008 11:41:39 AM Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source ROG ~lQ; CO ~Qj PM10 PM2.5 Natural Ges Hearth landscape 0.73 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.45 TOTALS (Ibsfday, unmitigated) 0.58 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area Source Mitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Mi0gated Source R_.O(; fly CO X42 PM70 PM2.5 Natural Gas Headh Landscape 0.13 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 ConsumerProduds Architectural Coatings 0.45 TOTALS (Ibs/day, mitigated) 0.50 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area Source Mitloation Measu res Selected Area Source Chanoes to Defaults S,'92 2.75 2.75 CO2 2.75 2.75 W O Page: 9 5f1/2008 11:41:39 AM Operational Unmitigated Detail Report OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated ;~ ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM25 CO2 Mini Warehouse 1.03 1.54 13.30 0.01 2.11 0.41 1,255.10 TOTALS (IbsPoay, unmitigated) 1.03 1.54 13.30 0.01 2.11 0.41 1,255.10 Operational Settings: Does not include correction for passby trips Does not include double mounting adjustment for internal trips Analysis Year: 2009 Temperature (~: 80 Season: Summer Emfac: Version : Emfar2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Summary of land Uses Land Use Type Acreage Trip Rate Unit Type No. Units Total Trips Total VMT Mini Warehouse 38.87 aces 3.50 136.04 1,220.73 136.04 1,220.73 VehiGe Fleet Mbr VehiGe Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 51.6 1.4 98.2 0.4 Ligh[Tmck <3750 Ihs 7.4 2.7 93.2 4.1 Light Truck 3751-57501bs 22.9 0.4 99.6 0.0 Med Truck 5751-85001bs 10.6 0.9 99.1 0.0 Lite-Heavy Truck 8501.10,000 Ibs 1.6 0.0 81.2 16.8 Lite-Heavy Truck 10,001-74,000 Ibs 0.5 0.0 60.0 40.0 -..\ W ~i Page: 10 5/1/2009 11:41:39 AM Vehicle Type Med-Heavy Trud< 14,001.33,000 Ibs Heavy-Heavy Truck 33,001-60,000 Ibs Other Bus Urban Bus Mctarcyde School Bus Motor Home Urban Trip Length (miles) Rural Trip Length (miles) Trip speeds (mph) of Trips-Residential of Trips -Commercial (by land use) Mini Warehouse Vehide Fleet Mlx Percent Type 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.9 Travel Conditions Residential Non-Catalyst Catalyst Dlesel 0.0 22.2 77,8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 Home-Work Home-Shop Hame-Other 12.7 7.0 9.5 17.6 12.1 14.9 30.0 30.0 30.0 32.9 16.0 49.1 Ooerational Chanoes to De(aul[s Commercial Commute Non-Work 13.3 7.4 15.4 9.6 30.0 30.0 2.0 1.0 Customer 8.9 12.6 30.0 97.0 W N ~Z P393 ~~~.- .,RC--~~•- E C O L O G I C A L SCI E N CES.inc. General Habitat Suitability Evaluation f'/3-acre Site San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 7285 SVL Box Victorville, CA 92392 Prepared by: Scott Cameron Ecological Sciences, Inc. 601 Glade Drive Santa Paula, CA 93060 805.921.0583 April 2008 P394 ,-r,n -- W.:.~c _.....~ E G O L O G I G A L S C I E N C E 5. inc April 15, 2008 Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 7285 SVL Box Victorville, CA 92392 SUBJECT: Results of General Habifat Suitabi/ity Evaluation, t~13-acre Sife, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Mancinelli: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a ±13-acre site to support sensitive biological resources as part of the environmental review process. Introduction /Background The subjec±±13-acre site is regionally located in San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). Specifically, the project site is located at the southwest intersection of Interstate 15 and the 210 Freeway. The site occurs on the Cucamonga Creek USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Plate 2). Projects proposed in this area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensitive biological resources must demonstrate to reviewing agencies [e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS or Service), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), County of San Bernardino (County), City of Rancho Cucamonga (City)] that potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources are adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended, and other applicable environmental regulations as part of project approval. Biological surveys were previously conducted on the northern parcel (Phase I, 9.87-acres, APN 0228- 011-31,) in November 2002 by Ecological Sciences. The project (RV storage facility) was approved by the City on April 14, 2003 (DRC 2003-00048). The remaining southern ±3-acres (Phase II) are proposed for self-storage facility. As such, the intent of the current survey effort was to 1) update and revise (if necessary) existing biological conditions present on the Phase I site, and 2) survey the southern Phase II site in order to provide the applicant and resource agencies with preliminary biological information required for planning and permitting decisions concerning the proposed project. Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal or habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of selected sensitive biological resources cannot be made in this report. Therefore, conclusions relative to poteritial presence or absence of certain sensitive biological resources are based solely on the nature of habitat present. This general analysis of biological resources is based on information compiled through Feld reconnaissance, literature review, and by applicable reference materials. Methods used in this study are outlined below. Methodology Scientific Literature Compilation and Review Documentation pertinent to the biological resources in the vicinity of the site was reviewed and analyzed. Primary data sources reviewed to evaluate the occurrence potential of special-status resources on the subject site, included, but were not necessarily limited to: (1) California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB 2007) and (2) California Native Plant Society (GNPs) on-line inventory for the Cucamonga 601 GIADE DalvE ~ SANTA PAULA, CA 93060 ~ TEL 805.921.0583 ~ Fnx 805.921.0683 email: scameron@ecosciencesinc.com ~ I _~ i~ ~ i~--i I Tv ~ . a,~ r (~ , Wm. _~ ~_ ,.f . - oYw I mR~ .,I~ ~ ~ ,I cC _ u ~ I n ~ ~ ~ ~ .ren ; ~ ~ ~ .v I w ~ ~ i ~ n•ar. , it :~ ;'~ r ~ -~- . . .~.Oa%L Ym Palen Wpn1 Mrt~~at .'_: . ~ ~ .1.- 9 _:~ I \~ ) __ _ __ .. . ` ..~ ~ ~. .. i - : ~ Ln SwYe. 4 ~-- __ .~ _ _, __ i ~ _ _ _ _ _ - ~. ,. _ ~ _ ~.: _ _ _ _, _ _ ., ,y\ "" . __... ~. _. . f -_. - - -~ ~. ' - P t S t . - ~, _. - - _ __ ro/ec i e ,r „ - - i _ - _- ~„ _ _ _ _ % ,. ~. - -. ^- , 1 ~ __ ~ ~~ ~ .. - 1 ti __ _ I iI Lam. - .. --- -_ ~ _ .... ....W...._ ..I ~............`.... - ~- _ + - _ .1 ~ - ..- _._._. .. NWw 4M~ i~~d.~ - ~~ ~ --~ w1.1. ~ }O iapo(jud~ C~P>+gltl ®19-9 -vlmm YamlGh nff Op-6 ~~ L500 fi 5~~k: l :50000 MN: 11.0 Dtl~: WG~1 ~ea..41F. _ _ „L~} ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES -~. March 2008 plate Regional Site Location 13-acre Site P395 P396 1' - r/ .+/'- m~~ Ha r _- _ - - I - i 1 ~-' ~S, ~..~, r '~' - ~ I ~,~ Summit Ave %' ¢ v i ~. ,= ~L ~ ~ t;__ _ 1 , ~ r~~r ~j ~ .,. % . it = _ f~505 _ _ f /~ / ~ = ~ag- i-ng :,1 - it _= a - ..' f i - ' i J ^--~~ ~"^~~.--.,~,,c~~~R' " ~- - I~ - a., i,~. _ 'k _ - _. _ ~ l ~ _i = _ _ .I• _ _ ~. Project Site .! _ ~~ _ __ II r y . ----'~ _ .-_ o `LI i 5= ~ I ., s _ ~15 ~ _ _ -_ ~ ~ , I' - -- _. I' '- ~~ r ~ ~ - ~ fl= e ~ ---- d r. ,, wl~ .. -~ ~ ~- /~ r 1 ~~~ ~ f' ~~ - ... - i . _ - - '. :-.- ,:,, - _ X33 :yl, y _ ~. _ ~, ~ _ ~. -,~ ~ L_. ^ :- _ I _ _ ~-.. ~ ,--._ _._. -. - = I .. = - . "` l- _ y ;SFr ~ L~ ~._ ,. I~ _ - - ~ ^S~ !. t ~ - t _--~ . ~ . / ~~ .. ~ II ~ h ~ ~ . 1.. ~ '~ ~ n ... -_L~N~_. AT _ ' _ --- _ A s / it ' /i Pnc 2D igloEiaolc (glnyLl d~ LqF Iklacme 1'uunlv4 ~~ ad116 Solace Ain: RSG'! N-1 DIG fl `ia4: 1: L' WO I1.A.cu11y0 Itmm~. NG181 ~s xr c EGOLOGIC4L SCIENCES x. March 2008 plate 2 Site Vicinity 13-acre Site P397 Peak, Devore, Guasti, and Fontana USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps, (3) available literature pertaining to habitat requirements of special-status species potentially occurring in the project site; and (4) distribution data contained in Hall (1981); Grinnell and Miller (1944); Garrett and Dunn (1981); Holland (1986); Stebbins (1985); Hickman (1993); and CNPS (2001). Special-status or sensitive species are those that have been afforded special protection or recognition by federal, state, or local resource conservation agencies due principally to declining or limited populations, mainly as a result of habitat reduction. 2008 Field Survey Ecological Sciences, Inc. biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to update and characterize on-site habitats and to evaluate their potential to support sensitive species on February 26, 2008. Plant species and vegetation communities were primarily identifed by walking transects over portions of the site. All direct observations of wildlife were recorded, as was wildlife sign. In addition to species actually detected, expected use of the site by other wildlife was evaluated from habitat analysis of the site, combined with known habitat preferences of locally occurring wildlife species. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal, or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered, or othervvise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. Weather conditions during the February 2008 survey included relatively clear skies (2% cloud cover), slight breeze to occasional gusts (1-8 mph) and air temperatures of 74-67 °F. Existing Biological Conditions The site generally characterized as a relatively undisturbed site supporting remnant scrub/alluvial habitat that forms an often dense vegetative coverage. This remnant mixed scrub vegetation occurs on a flat upland terrace adjacent to the concrete-lined Etiwanda Flood Control Channel. On-site vegetation is no longer exposed to fluvial processes (due to channelization of the area) resulting in an overgrown, mature vegetative phase. The habitat is mostly intact, but isolated by existing development. The southern portion of the site supports a much lower and open shrub canopy. Woodchip debris piles are present in the northern portion of the site. Some historic scrapingldiscing is evident. Surrounding land uses include the concrete-lined Etiwanda Flood Control Channel to the west, followed by development; the 210 Freeway/Interstate 15 transition to the east; the 210 Freeway to the north; and Interstate 15 to the south. Elevation at the site is approximately 1360 above msl. Plates 3a and 3b illustrate existing site conditions. Vegetation Holly-leaved cherry (Prunus ilicifolia ssp. ilicifolia), skunkbrush (Rhus trilobata), and elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) were the most common larger shrubs/trees recorded on site. Additional shrubs included scattered California buckwheat (Eriogonum fascicu/atum), chamise (Adenostoma (ascicu/atum), California broom (Lotus scoparius), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), black sage (Saliva me/lifera), white sage (Saliva apiana), ceanothus (Ceanothus spp.), goldenbush (Ericameria sp.), yerba Santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx), chaparral mallow (Ma/acothamnus fascicu/atus), goldenbush (Ericameria sp.), poison oak (7oxicodendron diversi/obum), scale-broom (Lepidospartum squamatum), beardtongue (Penstemon spectabilis), and grcundsel (Senecio sp.). Other plant species present included prickly pear cactus (Opuntia /ittoralis), cholla (Opuntia sp.), Our lord's candle (Yucca whipplel), and tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca). Dominant grasses and fortis include rye (Leymus condensatus), ripgut (Bromus diandrus), foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens), leymus (Leymus condensatus), filaree (Erodium cicutarium), California Croton (Croton ca/ifornicus), fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesiQ, wild cucumber (Marsh macrocarpus), sun cup (Camissonia sp.), pygmy-weed (Crassu/a connata), California everlasting (Gnaphalium californicum), tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), ~` Mr. Brvno Mancinelli April 15, 2008 Page 4 P398 View to north View to south ~~ ni ~~ ~!~i ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE S MorCh 2008 plate 3 Q Site Photographs 13-acre Site P399 View to west View to east r ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE S March 2006 plate 3 b Site Photographs 13-acre Site P400 March 2008 13-acre Site ~r,:.< plate 4 SCIENCE 5 E `o `a c I ~ A ` Special-Status Species Records for Site Vicinity P401 London rocket (Sysimbrium irio), comb-bur (Pectocarya penicillata), Eucrypta (Eucrypta chrysanthemifolia), popcorn flower (P/agiobothrys, collinus var. californicus), Rancher's fireweed (Amsinckia menziesil), coyote melon (Cucurbita palmata), and tocolote (Centaurea mellitensis). Wildlife Wildlife species directly observed on site included American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), western meadowlark (Sturnella neglects), Say's phoebe (Sayornis soya), Califomia towhee (Pipilo crissalis), scrub jay (Aphe/ocoma coeru/escens), Anna's hummingbird (Ca/ypte sons), white-throated swift (Aeronautes saxata/is), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), northern mockingbird (Mimus po/yglottos), and house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Common small mammals recorded, or of which sign was detected, included coyote (Canis /afrans), California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyl), desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonl), pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), and kangaroo rat (Dipodomys sp.). Common reptile species observed included side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana). Soil Conservafion Map Review Soils present on site were generally characterized by friable soils with some scattered cobbles and gravel. Based on a review of the Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1980), the subject site contains Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (TvC) and Soboba gravelly loamy sand (SoC). Special-Status Biological Resources Evaluation Discussed in this section are plant and wildlife species potentially present in the study area that have been afforded special recognition by federal or state agencies. In addition, plants included on Lists 1, 2, 3, or 4 of the CNPS inventory are also considered of special-status. Vegetation communities that are unique, of relatively limited distribution, or of particular value to wildlife and considered sensitive by state and/or federal resource agencies are also discussed. Special-status species known from the region that potentially occur on site are summarized below in Table 1 (Plants) and 'rob/e 2 (Wildlife) based on review of the 2007 CNDDB electronic database and/or CNPS on-line electronic inventory and other data. The occurrence potential of the special-status species present below is based on results of. a reconnaissance-level field survey, habitat types present, and occurrence records of sensitive species from the site vicinity. Vegetation communities that are unique, of relatively limited distribution, or of particular value to wildlife and considered sensitive by state and/or federal resource agencies are also generally discussed. No focused botanical or zoological surveys were conducted. Plate 4 (previous page) illustrates CNDDB locality information for the site vicinity. Special-Status Plant Species No special-status plant species was detected on site during the reconnaissance survey, although several species not observed during the survey effort have slow-moderate to moderate occurrence potential. Special-status plant species known from the region that potentially occur within the project site are summarized below in Table 1. Table 1 Special-Status Plant Species Known from fhe Site Vicinityt ~Common.Name~ ~~ :+"~';.,,, i x tStatus -~,.,~~ ~ k~, Habrtatt xE,'a N €`"Flowenng ~ ~~yOccurrence 2 „>Sclentific'Name_~.."Federabti"_aState,~+f'CNP,S'.,,.:,Re° riiierneotskc;t'~~YP.eno'd;..~~ •Potentralti~ti Listed S ecies Marsh santlwon FE CE 1 B Swamps and marshes May-August Not Expectetl: Ananaria paludicola suitable habitat not resent m: ~~t Mr. Bruno Mancinelli April l5, 2008 Page B P402 Table 1-continued Special-Status Plant Species Known from the Site Vicinity' Common.Name"''~i .a~. t f " ;g~~-k ,+~,s'Status~r9 ~"'' y;J ' 'PI} ~Natiltat~t-y't ~*"' ~' tt;„aux ~''~`~s ~" F~i°w~ring' - Oc~,c u~rrenc~s uSeleH i /c Name,w, ~ ;Fede itil:,f~State~;„CNP58e . -.- .Re Wremenfsy,,,sa y,,,--P.enod+;, ~ ,;:~,Potenbelk-, Thread-leavetl brodia FE CE 1B Vernal pools, scrub, March-June Not Expected: Brodiaea filiiolia woodland, grasslands suitable habitat with cla soils not resent Slentler-homed FE CE 1 B Chaparral, alluvial fan Apol-June Not Expected: spinetlower sage scrub; terzaces suitable habitat Dodecahema and washes not present leptoceras Gambel's watercress ~ FE CT 1B Fresh or brackish April- Not Expected: Rohppa gambelii marshes September suitable habitat not resent Santa Ana River FE SE 18 Coastal scrub (alluvial June- Not Expected: woollystar fan) September suitable habitat Ehastrum densilolium ~ not present on ssp. sanaomm site; outside species known range; known only from Santa Ana River Other 5 ecial-status 5 ecies Wooly mountain- - - 18 Subalpine coniferous May- Not Expected: parsley forest, upper montane September suitable habitat Oreonana vestita coniferous forest not resent Prostrate navarretie - - 1B Coastal scrub, April-July Not Expected: h'avarretia prostrate grasslands, vernal suitable habitat ools/alkaline soils not resent California muhly - - 4 Chaparral, coastal July- Not Ezpectetl: Muhlenbergia sage, lower montane September suitable habitat calilomice coniferous forest near not present streams or see s San Gabriel linanthus - - 18 Lower and upper April-July Not Expected: Linanthus concinnus montane coniferous suitable habitat forest not resent Robinson's - - 18 Chaparral, sage scrub January-July Low-Moderate peppergrass Potential: Lepidium virginicum suitable habitat var. robinsonii resent Johnston's - - 18 Subalpine coniferous July- Not Expected: buckwheat forest September suitable habitat Enogonum not present microthecum var. 'ohnstonii Pierson's spring - - 1B Upper montane May-June Not Expected: beauty coniferous forest suitable habitat Claytonia lanceolate ndt present var. eirsonii Plummer's mariposa FSC - 18 Chaparral, coastal May-July Moderate lily scrub, cismontane Potential: Calochortus woodlantls suitable habitat lummerae resent Bristly sedge - - 2 Freshwater marshes, May- Not Ezpectetl: Carex comosa coastal prairie, September suitable habitat grasslands not present on site. San Bernardino FSC - 1B Mesic montane June-August Not Expectetl: Mountains owl's meadows, seeps and suitable habitat clover ' chaparral not present Castilla a lasiorh oche ~e Mr. Bruno Mancinelli April 15, 2008 Page 9 P403 Table 1-continued Special-Status Plant Species Known from the Sife Vicinity' Common?.Name~ ~ ~}7,~,."~` ~'StatusY~' ~"`~~J:~~+~~ '~' r~°'r3Ha61tat ~,;".~i ky Floweret g t =±pccurren'ce^~~ } ?Smentitlc~NameaU ~~Federal.~, e.5tatetx, F~CNPS ~ .~,.Re 'liireinents~` `}~ ~' ~"~P ~riod "u~„~ ,,~; potentiale;~ . White-bracted - - 1B Pinyon juniper „ April-June . Low Potential: spineFlower woodlantl and desert marginally Chohzanthe xantii var. scrub suitable habitat leucofheca resent Hot springs - - 2 Meadows near hoi July- Low Potential: fimbdstylis springs September marginally Fimbhsfylis thermalis suitable habitat resent Califamia bedstraw FSC - 1B Sandy, granitic soils in May-July Not Expected: Gelium calilomicum chapanals at lower suitable habitat ss , nmum etl a of ine belt not resent Mesa horkelia - - 18 Sandy, gravelly sites in February- Low Potential: Horkelia cuneata ssp. coastal sage September marginally pubemla scrub/chaparral suitable habitat habitats resent Lemon lily ' FSC - 1B Mesic areas in July-August Not Expected: LI lium panyi coniferous forests suitable habitat not present on site Los Angeles FSC - to Coastal salt and Augusi- Not Ezpactad: sunflower freshwater marshes Octoher suitable habitat Helianfhus nuttallii not present on spp. pahshii site; last seen in 1937 Parish's desert-thorn - - 2 Sandy to rocky soils in March-April Low Potential: Lycium panshii coastal and Sonoran marginally desert scrubs suitable habitat resent Pdngle's monardella FSC - 1A Sandy coastal scrub May-June Low Potential: Monardella phnglei marginally suitable habitat resent Parish's gooseberry ~ - - 18 Riparian woodlands February-April Not Expected: W bes divaricafum var. suitable habitat arishii not resent Smooth tarplant FSC _ 1B Alkaline grasslantls, April- Not Expecletl: Centromadia ~ meadows, playas, September suitable habitat unoens ss . laevis scrub habitats not resent BIaUC sedge - - 2 Marshes and swamps August- Not Expected: Schoenus nighcans September suitable habitat not resent Salt spring - - 2 Chaparrel, coastal and March-June Low Potential: checkerbloom desert scruhs, forests, marginally Sidalcea alkaline playas suitable habitat neomexicana resent Parry's spineflower FSC - 3 Chaparrel antl coastal April-June Low-Moderate Chorizanthe parryi scrub; associated with Potential: some ssp. parryi sandy or rocky suitable habitat o enin s, resent Southern California -. - 4 Chaparral, cismontane March-May Not Expectetl: black walnut wootlland, wastal would likely have Juglans califomicus scrub been recorded if var. calilornica resent Prairie wedge grass - -- 2 Mesic meadows antl April-July Not Expected: Sphenopholis woodlands, seeps suitable habitat obfusafa not resent ~v ~m~ Mr Bruno Mancinelli Aphl 15, 2008 Page 10 P404 Table 1-continued Special-Status Plant Species Known from the Sife Vicinity' cases onmanrv on rewew or status: Federal-115. Fish antl Wildlife Service FE: Federally Endangered FT: Federally Threatened Species FPE: Federally Proposed Endangered FPT: Federally Proposed Threatened FC: Federal Candidate Species FSC: Fetleral Species of Concern State-Califomia Department of Fish and Game CE: State Endangered CT: State Threatened electronic or online databases CNPS List tA: Plants presumed extinct in Califomia. List iB: Plants rare antl endangered in Califomia and elsewhere List 2: Plants rare and endangered in Califomia, but more common elsewhere List 3: Taxa about which more information is needed List 4: Plants of limitetl dis[dbution Special-Status Wildlife Species No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on site, although several species not observed during the survey effort have a moderate or high occurrence potential. Sensitive wildlife species potentially occurring on the project site are summarized below in Table 2. Table 2 Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity' a Commori3Name~~tx~iv~t'~x,a.~`.Status';~,xS'+<'~'^y?a^~~'~',sHatiltaY~Re utyem`,e}ts~~tOccurre-ncep~otentlal~') ' ,, ~ BcrenflflcrName~'~:,,ti<;~rFedeia7°rf;~,~~„State.,r~,t~.~,~`z~~~e--'~,. w~, e~.,„ '~~,h, ~_'``~,,v~'~?~`,~`+~"~~,,"yq;~;,1 INVERTEBRATES Delhi Sands Flower- FE - Open, sandy (Delhi soils), dune Not Expected: suitable loving fly areas supporting buckwheat, habitat not present Rhaphiomidas Croton, telegraph weed terminerus abdominalis Greenest tiger beetle - - Wootllands adjacent to Santa Not Expected: suitable Cicindela Ana River Basin habitat not present tranquebahca vindissima AMPHIBIANS ANDRE PTILES Western spadefoot - CSC Relatively open grasslands, Not Expected: suitable toad scrublands, and woodlands habitat not present Scaphiopus with fine, loose soil hammondii Sierra Madre yellow- FPE CSC Aquatic habkals Not Expected: suitable legged frog habitat not present on site; Rana muscosa proposed listing refers to populations in the San Gabriel, San Jacinto, and San Bernardino Mtns. San Gabriel - • Racks, ferns, wood, base of Not Expected: suitable Mountains slender talus slopes in San Gabriel habitat not present salamander Mtns. Batrachose s oabheli San Diego horned FSC CSC Relatively open grasslands, Low-MOtlerate Potential: lizard scrublands, and woodlands some suitable habitat present Phrynosoma with fne, loose soil coronatum blainvillii Orange-throated FSC CSC Relatively open grasslands, Low Potential: marginally whiptall scrublands, and woodlands suitable habitat present Cnemitlophorus with fne, loose soil h e hrus beldin i Mr Bruno Mancinelli April 75, 2008 Page 11 P4O5 Table 2-continued Specia/-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinityf Common Name -~,. E `~"A".~.-~".Stat us~.x4r' ~` ~~.~.,}IabltattRegufrsments "~[° a Occvrrence?PotenLalr `,: Sc/entific"Nameq~_3 x,,fetleral„?a s~.~tata~_ ~% 's'i`~''„~'~-;~~'~`"'~ ~~ ~ li, ; ''° ` Coastal western - . • , Sage scrub, chaparral, , , K. ~ , : Low-Moderate Potential: whip[ail grassland some suitable habitat present Cnemidophorus tighs mulfiscufa[us Northem red diamond - CSC Sage scrub, chapamal, Low Potential: marginally rattlesnake grasslands suitable habitat present Crofalus Tuber Tuber Southwestern pond - CSC Permanent or nearly permanent Not Expected: suitable turtle bodies of water with basking habitat not present Clemmys marmorata sites allida Rosy boa FSC - Desert and chaparral with Not Expected: suitable Lichanura frivirgafa motlerate to tlense vegetation habitat not present antl rock cover BIRDS White-tailed kite MNBMC CFP Open vegetation and uses Moderate Potential: possibly Elanus leucurus dense woodlands for cover forages over the site; no suitable nestin habitat Northem harrier - CSC Coastal salt marsh, freshwater Moderate Potential: possibly Circus cyaneus marsh, grasslands, and forages over the site; no a ricultural feltls suitable nestin habitat Swainson's hawk - CT Breeds in stands with few trees Low Potential: may Bufeo sweinsoni such as juniper, riparian areas. occasionally forage over the Forages over grasslands, site during migration; no agricultural feltls supporting suitable nesting habitat rodent o ulations. resent Ferruginous hawk FSC, CSC Grasslands, agricultural fields, Low-Moderate Potential: Buteo regalis MNBMC and open scruhlands possibly forages over the site as seasonal migrant; does not breed in area. Golden eagle - CSC, CFP Mountains, tleserts, and open Low Potential: may Aquila chrysaetos country occasionally forage over the site; no suitable nesting habitat resent CoopeYS hawk - CSC Dense stands of live oaks antl Not Expected: suitable Acci iter coo aril ri arian woodlands. habitat not resent Prairie falcon - CSC Grasslands, savannas, Low-Moderate Potential: Falco mexicanus rangelantl, agricultural feltls, may foage over the site in and desert scrub; requires winter; no suitable nesting sheltered cliff faces far shelter habitat resent Burrowing owl FSC, CSC Grasslands and open scrub Low-Moderate Potential: Afhene cuniculana MNBMC some suitable habitat resent Long-eared owl -- CSC Riparian bottomlands to tall Not Expected: suitable Asio otus willows and cottonwoods; oaks habitat not present alon stream courses Mountain plover PT CSC Agricultural areas, fallow fields, Not Expected: suitable Charadnus montanus rasslands, rairies habitat not resent Least Bell's vireo FE CE Willow dominated riparian Not Expected: suitable Vireo bellii usillus hahitat with dense understo ri arian habitat not resent Southwestern willow FE - Riparian habitats along rivers, Not Expected: suitable flycatcher streams, or other wetlands riparian habitat not present Empidonax fraillii usually with standing water eztimus Tricolored blackbirtl - CSC Grasslands, wetland areas with Not Expected: suitable A elaius tricolor cattails, bulrushes, willows habitat not resent on site California horned lark - CSC Grasslands, tlisturbed areas, Low Potential: marginally Eremophila alpestns agriculture fields, and beach suitable habitat present actia areas ~~. ~!~~ Mr Bruno Mancinelli April 15, 2008 Page 72 P406 Table 2-continued Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity' Common=Name , .r t€' f~ ~--~~5*r °Status~vs7z'~'c,t~ '~,HabttattRequirernents~,.r ~., ~ '!s '` t ^ "sOccurrencePotenhal -~~~.+ '° - " ~ .Scientlfia'Name,,,, rs v,dF.ederel:~._„f_a-.State~t.,, , „- S ~. w ~ fz , x,~G,~ssa~`v .S.at.k~:.ii..Y ,y"'~ r -fi i' a ~ -1 ~~t~x.?~~:-..4~r:n~,;;,~!y California coastal FT CSC Coastal sage scrub in areas of Low Potential: marginally gnalcatcher flat or gently sloping terrain suitable habitat present Polioptila califomica califomica Loggerhead shrike - CSC Grasslands with scattered High Potential: potentially Lanius ludovicianus shrubs, trees, fences or other suitable habitat present arches 5. California nrfous- - CSC Coastal sage scrub, grasslands Moderate Potential: crownetl spartow potentially suitable habitat Aimophila mficeps present canescens Bell's sage spartow MNBMC CSC Coastal sage scrub, chaparal Moderate Potential: Amphispiza Belli Belli potentially sutable habitat resent MAMMALS Long~ared myolis FSC - Found in nearly all brush. Low Potential: potential Myofis evotis woodland, and forest ha6itets foraging habitat from sea level to at least 9,000 ft. Small-footetl myolis FSC - Arid wootletl and brushy Low Potential: potential Myofis ciliolabrum uplantls near water from sea foraging habitat level to at least 9,000 ft. Fnngetl myotis FSC - Utilizes open habitats antl early Not Expected: lack of Myofis thysanodes successional stages, streams, potential foraging and nesting lakes, antl ponds from sea level habitat to at least 9.350 ft. Lang-legged myotis FSC - Found in needy all brush, Low Potential: potential Myofis volans wootllantl, and forested foraging habitat. habitats from sea level to arountl 9,000 ft. Yuma myotis FSC CSC Found in a variety of habitats; Not Expectetl: lack of Myofis yumanensis optimal habitats are open potential foraging and nesting forests and woodlands with habitat sources of water over within to teetl Spotted bat FSC CSC Deserts, scrublands, chaparral, Low Potential: potential Euderma maculate and coniferous woodlands fora in habitat Pale big-eared bat FSC CSC Utilizes a variety of Not Expectetl: lack of Corynorhinus (Full (Full communities, including conifer potential foraging and nesting fownsendii pa/lescens Species) Species) and oak woodlands antl forests, habitat arid grasslands and deserts, and high-elevation forests and meadows Pallid bat - CSC Arid habitats, including Not Expected: lack of Antrozous pallidus grasslands, shrublands, potential foraging antl nesting woodlands, and forests; prefers habitat rocky oNCrops, diNs, and crevices with access to open habitats for fora in Western mastiff bat FSC CSC Primarily aritl lowlands and Low Potential: may forage Eumops perotis (ssp. coastal basins with ruggetl, over the site: no suitable califomicus tali/omicus) rocky terrain, along with nesting habitat present suitable crevices for da -roosts Western yellow bat -- -- Valley foothill riparian, desert Low Potential: potential Lasiurus xanthinus ripadan, desert wash, palm foraging habitat oasis habitats Pocketetl free-tailed - CSC Arid areas, desert scrub, desert Low Potential: potential bat wash, desert ripadan foraging habitat Nyctinomops femorosaccus quo Mr. Bruno Mancinelli April 75, 2008 Page 13 P407 Table 2-continued Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity[ Common;Nam'e~ z -'^rac. s s ~.., Status- ~ v ~~' 'Habitat Requirements ~ & 'Occurrence3PotenbalG : `' - ~ Sc/enbfic;Name r- ~. Federalid„~ ~ .. ~ .,.State:.r, ' A 7 n'htc ~ cis' ,.,,,t .~ f ~T ,. ~ ~ s, 'x""`TX.. Tr:.T,tj v ? ~:`L - „„~~'°~ ~t~. -3.~.~„ t San Diego black-tailed - CSC Grasslands, shrublands High Potential: potentially jackrabbit suitable habitat present Lepus calilomicus bennettii Northwestern San - CSC Open shrublands, sandy areas low-Moderate Potential: Diego pocket mouse some suitable habitat present Chaetodipus lallax lallax Pallid San Diego -- CSC Coeslal scrub, chaparral, Low Potential: site not likely pocket mouse grassland within species range Chaefadipus califomicus allidus Los Angeles pocket FSC CSG Grasslands, open sage scrub Low-Moderate Potential: mouse some suitable habitat present Perognathus longimembhs brevinasus San Bernardino FE CSC Alluvial habitats with coastal Low Potential: marginally kangaroo rat scrub, chaparral, grassland suitable habitat present; site Dipodomys merriami not exposed to fluvial parvus rocesses Stephens' kangaroo FE CE Grasslands, open sage snub Not 6rpetted: suitable habitat rat not present Di otlom s sfe hensi San Diego desert - CSC Motlerate to dense sage scrub; Moderate Potential: suitable woodrat rocky outcrops habitat present Naofoma lepida inrermedia Table 2 Ke :'Based rimaril on review of 2007 CNDDB Status: (nesting) =For most taza the CNDDB is interested in sightings for the presence of resident populations. For some '~ s sties rimaril birds ,the CNDDB onl tracks cenain arts of the s ecies ran a or life histo e.., nestin locations . ' Federal-U.S. Fish and Widlife Service State-Califomia Department of Fish and Game I'~ FE: Federally Endangered CE: Califomia Endangered ~, FT: Federally Threatened CT: California Threatened '. FPE: Federally Proposed Endangered CCE: California Candidate (Endangered) i FPT: Federally Proposed Threatened CCT: California Candidate (threatened) ~~ FC: federal Candidate for listing as CFP: California Fully Protected threatenetl or endangered CP: Califomia Protected I FSC: Federal Species of Concern-not CSC: California Special Concern '~, formally protected under law • : Califomia Special Animal (species with no official MNBMC: Migratory Nongame Birds of federal or state status but are included on I Management Concern (not shown for , CDFG's Special Animals list) ' federally listed or proposed threatened or endan ered s ecies Special-Status Habitats Special-status habitat types are vegetation communities that support concentrations of sensitive plant or wildlife species, are of relatively limited distribution, or are of particular value to wildlife (CNDDB), Although sensitive habitats are not necessarily afforded legal protection unless they support protected species, potential impacts to them may increase concerns and mitigation suggestions by resources agencies. Special-status habitats known from the site vicinity per review of CNDDB (2007) include Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, Coastal and valley freshwater marsh, southern riparian forest, southern sycamore alter riparian woodland, and California walnut woodland. Remnants of alluvial fan sage scrub and Riversidean sage scrub are present on site. m: !~!wJ Mr. Bruno Mancinelli Apd175, 2008 Page 74 P408 Jurisdictional Resources Regulatory Framework Drainages, streambed, and creeks are potentially considered "waters of the United States" subject to jurisdiction by the USACOE under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In addition, a 1603 agreement with CDFG would be required prior to any disturbances upon stream-associated habitats (e.g., riparian). Based on review of the Cucamonga Peak USGS quadrangle map and site survey results, no blue-line, other drainage features and/or riparian habitats are present on site. The concrete-lined Etiwanda Creek Flood Control Channel occurs west and adjacent to the site. Wildlife Movement Corridors The proposed project site is essentially surrounded by existing development, and therefore, it is highly unlikely that the subject site occupies an important location relative to regional wildlife movement. As such, project implementation would not be expected to have any substantial effect on local or regional wildlife movement. Discussion Potential Constraints Posed by Sensitive Biological Resources Constraints posed by biological resources upon development of the project site were generally evaluated by ranking the following sensitive biological issues, listed in descending order of significance: (1) a federally or state-listed endangered or threatened species of plant or animal; (2) streambeds, wetlands, and their associated vegetation; (3) habitats suitable to support a federally or state-listed endangered or threatened species of plant or wildlife; (4) species designated as candidates for federal listing; (6) habitat, other than wetlands, considered sensitive by regulatory agencies or resource conservation organizations; and (6) other species or issues of special concern to agencies, resource conservation organizations, or other interest groups. The level of constraint that a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential development typically depends on the following criteria: (1) the relative value of that resource; (2) the amount or degree of impact to the resource; (3) whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of state and/or federal regulations or laws; (4) whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resource agencies; and (5) the degree to which impacts on the resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA. The actual or potential presence of sensitive biological resources (special-status species) on the project site could impose some degree of constraint on development depending upon the nature of both direct and indirect impacts on these resources, as well as on the particular species and seasonal timing of construction activities. During permitting procedures, certain measures (generally described below) to avoid or further reduce potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources may be necessary pursuant to CEQA and the Act. An evaluation of whether or not an impact on biological resources would be substantial must consider both the resource itself and how that resource fits into a regional or local context. Substantial impacts would be those that would diminish, or result in the loss of, an important biological resource, or those that would obviously conflict with local, state, or federal resource conservation plans, goals, or regulations. Directed biological surveys for certain biological resources may be required by reviewing agencies prior to development (conducted during appropriate survey periods). Results of additional surveys (if required) would be used to make a definitive presencelabsence determination for certain potentially occurring species, and more fully evaluate impact significance prior to site development. If listed species (i.e., threatened or endangered) were later determined to be present within areas proposed for impacts, then additional measures would be necessary prior to construction to further reduce and/or mitigate for potential impacts to sensitive resources. m: `m+wrJ Mc Bruno Mancinelli April i5, 2008 Page 15 P409 Nc special-status plant species were directly recorded on site during the survey effort. Most species known from the site vicinity are not expected due to absence of suitable habitat. However, Plummet's mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and Robinson's peppergrass have either a moderate or low-moderate occurrence potential. These plant species have not been assigned any formal state or federal rarity designation, but are considered federal species of concern, CNPS List 1B, and/or List 3 species. Development of the site would remove a portion of potentially suitable habitat and could result in the elimination of individual plants (if present) where development and plant occurrence are coincidental. Nonetheless, site development would not likely eliminate CEQA-significant amounts of habitat for these special-status plant species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. No special-status wildlife species were directly recorded on site during the February 2008 survey effort. However, several species have a moderate and/or high occurrence potential including loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit, and desert woodrat. These species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered, and as such, were removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Project impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habitat locally, neither of which would likely be considered significant. Site development would not likely eliminate sigoificant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potentials), they are likely uncommon on such a small and isolated site (e.g., coastal western whiptail, coast (San Diego) horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, Los Angeles pocket mouse). Accordingly, development impacts would not likely constitute a significant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within southern California or their overall range. No direct observations or western burrowing owl sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey remains, etc.) were recorded during the survey. However, California ground squirrel burrows potentially suitable to accommodate owls were recorded on site. None of the potential burrows inspected during the survey effort were determined to be currently occupied or recently used by burrowing owls based on the lack of owl observations and absence of sign around burrow entrances. Despite that fact that the site is surrounded by existing development, the burrowing owl (low-moderate occurrence potential) may occur in less than optimal conditions. While the burrowing owl and other potentially occurring native avian species are not protected by state or federal endangered species acts, these species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711) and CDFG Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 which prohibits take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs (in particular raptor species). If it were later determined that active nests would be lost or indirectly impacted as a result of site-preparation, it could result in adverse impacts and would be in conflict with these regulations. Specifc burrowing owl survey protocol and mitigation guidelines were developed and described in a 1995 CDFG Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Zarn 1974,) to reduce project-related impacts to burrowing owls (and used for other native avian species). If site preparation activities occur during the nesting season of the burrowing owt/native nesting species (generally February 1 through August 31), a pre-construction burrowing owl/nesting avian survey (within 30 days of construction) is recommended to determine if active nests of species protected by the MBTA and/or CDFG are present in the construction zone for CEQA compliance and subsequently evaluate appropriate measures that may reduce potential adverse project-related impacts. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the site should be resurveyed if suitable habitat is present. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed (pursuant to 1995 CDFG guidelines) until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a stage that they can leave the nest on their own). Take of active nests must be avoided. If owls must be moved away from the disturbance area, passive relocation techniques (where applicable outside of the breeding season) should be used rather than trapping (CDFG Staff Report 1995). At least m6.% Mr Bruno Mancinelli Apnl 15, 2008 Page 76 P410 one or more weeks would be necessary to accomplish passive translocation and allow for owls to acclimate to alternate burrows (CDFG 1995). If avoidance is the preferred or accepted mitigation method, no grading or heavy equipment activity should take place within at least 75 meters (±250 feet) of an active nest during the breeding season, and 50 meters (±160 feet) during the non-breeding season (CDFG 1995). If additional surveys confirm that the site is occupied, appropriate mitigation measures to minimize impacts to burrowing owls/native avian species (to a level of less than significant) should be incorporated into the final CEQA document as enforceable conditions (CDFG 1995). Compliance with the MBTA and CDFG codes would be necessary prior to development, however no special permit or approval is typically required in most instances. Development activities performed outside of the avian breeding season would generally eliminate the need to conduct pre-activity nesting surveys for most common native species known from the site vicinity, and likely ensure that there were no constraints to construction relative to the MBTA/CDFG code. Development of the proposed project also would remove remnant scrub potentially suitable for foraging by several other species of sensitive raptors (e.g., white-tailed kite, northern harrier, prairie falcon, ferruginous hawk) during winter or migration periods. Because most potentially occurring raptor species are very widespread and roam aver large areas of foraging territory, these losses would amount to a relatively small, incremental reduction of seasonal foraging habitat and occasional use areas. Accordingly, removal of remnant scrub habitats would not likely eliminate significant amounts of foraging habitat for these species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. Two federally listed species have a low potential to occur on the site: coastal California gnatcatcher and San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Because of the presence of remnant scrub/alluvial habitat and the relatively close proximity of the site to extant occurrences, resource agencies may require the performance of focused surveys to make a more definitive presence/absence determination (and therefore more fully evaluate impact significance) for Act compliance during the appropriate survey period and prior to site disturbance. Endangered or threatened species presence on the site could result in potentially significant impacts, extensive mitigation, and substantial cdnstraints to development. Conclusion Results of the general habitat suitability evaluation conducted in February 2008 indicate that habitats present on the ±13-acre site generally represent lower biological resource values based on the degree ih which expected impacts to on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present due to development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special-status species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact designated critical habitat. The site would not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special- status species. ufE~.! As previously stated, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87-acre northern parcel) was previously ~'P'a'0c`~"~ approved for development by the City. Fundamentally, after development of the northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining southern ±3-acres (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining ±3-acres would ostensibly be reduced. Mr. Bruno Mancinelli Apnl 15, 2009 Page 17 P411 During permitting procedures, specific measures to avoid or further reduce potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources may be required as part of project approval depending upon the particular species, as well as the nature, extent, and seasonal timing of proposed construction activities. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits represent the facts, statements, and information presented herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Sincerely, Ecological Sciences, Inc. Scott D. Cameron Principal Biologist m: Mr Bruno Mancinelli April 15, 2008 Page 18 P412 References California Burrowing Owl Consortium. 1993. Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines. April 1993. 12 pp. ' California Department of Fish and Game. 1995. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. C. F. Raysbrook Interim Director. October 17, 1995. 7 pp. California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). 2007. Computer Reports for the Cucamonga Peak, Devore, Guasti, and Fontana USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps. California Environmental Quality Act. 2002. CEQA Guidelines. Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California. ISBN #1-931362-09-02. California Native Plant Society, 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (sixth edition). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. x + 388pp. California Native Plant Society. 2003. Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, Cucamonga Peak U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quad. California Native Plant Society. 2007. CNPS Website Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California for the Cucamonga Peak USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. California, State of. 1989. Fish and Game Code. Collins, J.T. 1990. Standard Common and Scientific Names for North American Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. Third Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Lawrence, Kansas. Ecological Sciences, Inc. 2002. Results of General Biological Assessment, 112-acre Site, San Bernardino County, California. November 24. Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California, Status and Distribution. The Artisan Press, Los Angeles, California. 408 pp. Grinnell, J., and A. H. Miller. 1944. The Distribution of the Birds of California. In Pacific Coast Avifauna. No. 27. Cooper Ornithological Club. Berkeley, California. Hall, E.R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2 vol.). Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California. 1400 pp. Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. California Department of Fish and Game Report. 156 pp. McKernan, R.L. 1997. The Status and Known Distribution of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus): Field Surveys Conducted Between 1987 and 1996. Report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, Second Edition. Peterson feld guide series, Houghton Mifflin Co. 336 pp. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1980. Sail Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California. Soil Conservation Service. Mr. Bruno Mancinelli April 15, 2008 Page 79 P413 References-continued U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996 (Feb. 28). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Plant and Animal Taxa that are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Volume 61, Number 40. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of the Interior. 1999. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Plant and Animal Taxa that are Candidates or Proposed for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Recycled Petitions; Annual Description o(Progress and Listing Actions; Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Volume 64, Number 205. 50 CFR Part 17, October 25. Zarn, M. 1974. Burrowing owl. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Technical Note T-N 250. Denver, Colorado. 25 pp. in California Department of Fish and Game (1995), Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. C. F. Raysbrook Interim Director. October 17, 1995. 7 pp. Zeiner, D. C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., and K. E. Mayer. 1968. California's Wildlife. Vol. 1. Amphibians and Reptiles. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Zeiner, D. C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayer, and M. White. 1990. Califomia's Wildlife. Vol. ll. Birds. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Zeiner, D. C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayer, and M. White. 1990. Califomia's Wild/i/e. Vol. Ill. Mammals. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Mr. Bruno Mancinelli Apnl 15, 2008 Page 20 P414 RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935, A REQUEST TO AMEND PART II, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.24.300 OF THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS BY ADDING SECTION .304 UNDER CONDITIONAL USES, THEREBY PERMITTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND BOAT STORAGE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, SUBJECT TO BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND ADJACENT TO THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission approved the initiation of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. 3. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specificallyfinds that all of the facts setforth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced .public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 to permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land; and c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment contemplates amending Part II, Chapter 5, Section 5.24.300 of the Open Space District by adding Section .304 under Conditional Uses, thereby permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities as conditionally permitted use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 freeway interchange; and; EXHIBIT F PLANNING COMMISSION RE~JLUTION N0. OB-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 2 P415 d. This Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor on the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in the Open Space District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a location that is suitable for the storage of personal property because of its immediate adjacency to the I-15 and I-210 Freeways; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will provide the necessary legislative action that will permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and storage facility in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00935. The master plan and Phase I of the recreational and vehicle storage facility was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 on April 14, 2004, by the Planning Commission at a public hearing; and f. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by conditionally permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in a location that is appropriate for this type of land use; and g. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the Open Space District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Plan. d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is in conformance with the General 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in the Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RE..JLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 3 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends thatthe City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plah Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 by the adoption of this Resolution recommending approval of the attached Draft City Council Ordinance, including the conditions shown below. Plannino Department 1) The applicant shall agree to.defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality i) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. P416 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile PLANNING COMMISSION Rt_..JLUTION NO. OS-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 4 construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. P417 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. PLANNING COMMISSION RL_JLUTION NO.08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 5 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 1 1) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: P418 PLANNING COMMISSION RE..JLUTION NO.OS-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 6 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction arid notifythe monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depositary (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). P419 • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. PLANNING COMMISSION RE. ELUTION NO.OS-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 7 Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented forthe proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site: 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Plan (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. P420 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. PLANNING COMMISSION RE~JLUTION NO.OB-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 8 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. B) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W ater Quality Management Plan (W OMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant. to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. P421 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RE.,JLUTION NO. 08-51 P422 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 9 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: Jarr/e~ R. Troyer; AICP; Secretary I, James R. Troffer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P423 ORDINANCE NO. $ ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935, A REQUEST TO AMEND PART II, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.24.300 OF THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS BY ADDING SECTION .304 UNDER CONDITIONAL USES, THEREBY PERMITTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND BOAT STORAGE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, SUBJECT TO BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND ADJACENT TO THE TO THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission approved the initiation of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. 3. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-51 recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. 4. On November 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 6, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:' The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application is in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application DRC2008-00204 to permit Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land; P424 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 2 c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment contemplates amending Part II, Chapter 5, Section 5.24.300 of the Open Space District by adding Section .304 under Conditional Uses, thereby permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities as conditionally permitted use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and. San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 freeway interchange; and d. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor on the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in the Open Space District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a location that is suitable for the storage of personal property because of its immediate adjacency to the I-15 and I-210 Freeways; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will provide the necessary legislative action that will permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vefifc{e and storage facility in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00935. The master plan and Phase I of the recreational and vehicle was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 on April 14, 2004, by the Planning Commission at a public hearing; and f. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by conditionally permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in a location that is appropriate for this type of land use; and g. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and; c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: P425 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, thereby amending Part II of Chapter 5, Section 5.24 Open Space Districts, as listed below and including the conditions shown below: Addition of the following bold text to Part II of Chapter 5, Section 5.24 Open Space Districts: .304 Conditional Uses: Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage and Self Storage Facilities, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, offcers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. P426 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. P427 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 5 Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. P428 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 6 Biological Resources 1) If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: P429 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 7 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing P430 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 8 of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks, to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates, June 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. P431 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 5, 2008 Page 9 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. W L 0 ~ n~+ v , C~ 0 O U ~~ U ~O L ._ .+..~ ~U O U ~_ U 0 O Z U M~ W L N ~ _ N N ~ ~ O ~ c v ~ Z U .~ CLf ~ .C ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~ O N O fC9 oU ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N 'C L.- +~-~ C6 ~ C O ~ N C6 O O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ U ~ ~ L O O U U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ (B ~ ~ L _ 2~ p o o ca C j ~ Q ~ Q co to U -~ ~ (0 Q Q ~ .Q O ~ I I I Q ~ ~.i. EXHIBIT C6 O L Q. Q _~ / I..L L ~--+ L ~ _ • ~ ~~ •L \ \ ~ . }~ ~ A/ ~ L ~ (/1 . ~ O ~ O z ~ ~ U > L ~ ~ N U ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ U -a ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ I I I N ^~ ~i ~ ~u, ~ ~ ~x m ~ ~ r .N ~ ~, ~i~ ~ ~~ ~!;~ i ~~~ i f ~~ , r ; l r ~ ~,4 ~; ~.. . ~~ ~' . ~, ,.,, r ~~ ,~h , F ~~ ~ ~ti - ~~.. ~ i~ `'psi - 1 . • ,.'~~ .- -~. ~1 ,~~ ~ CC L C ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ i !~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ (0 ~ p 4- O fl- p N -Op N E +~ (n c ' ~ - ~ ~ c ~ c ~ ~ ~ O O W L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ U m ~ O O N a ~ _ .r N ~ C • ~ ~ ~ C p O N fn +~ N N ~ p ~ N ~ ~ ~ (B U N "'' ~ "p ~ ~ O "O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ a Q ~ ~o o c E ~ ~ ~ U O X ~ f0 p ~ ~ a (0 •L N ,~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U N ~ C N U N ~ ~ '~ •'=' C U (~ ~ O C ~ ca ~ .~ Q ~ a N O ~ L r-+ 3 ~ +-+ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o o ~ 3 ~ .~ i ~ ,~ c i ~ ~ ~ _ p O v ~ Q ~ O O p ~ U ~ p ,. ~ ~ = C c0 N ~ E o a~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ v > ~ O D U (n . Z ~ 3 ~ U li ~ I I I I ~ I W N LV N C ca L L a~ c a 3 N N li S ;; .1 i~- ~'~ ~~. i f ~~ ~~;~; ~ ~ ~~ //I ~1 ~/ i~ ///f~ //,% i b 1 I ~~ ~ ~a~ F ~s~ ~ 1yyyy ~F R O Zu~ a'3 ~~ ~~ rv ~~~! /% i / / ~, ', ~i ~~ ,J YinM1p!IiV~I^JNOYIY'.Xq dla`frN i ~ ~ t 8wuueld Io~nhaU4~N adeosp~~e 1 3rwanr wo~nwsc 1 g ~Sa r r .A. r,aa,... a"°,° °e"°a 3waols NH saroassoao ! I ~ ~ i s~aoMlluun~uuw~ s~,cw,~w.,~ux«',~ <h~4C~i 1 ! ~~ - -- ~I Ali °. _ 5 ° "A § x o„ o ~ ., o ~ ~~~Pi p ~°• {•, Atka: g'~~9 i D gg ~~ § e ~ gg 9i' P I ~ ~ ~ 4 YS ~~ ~~~ ~i =~ r I~ ! ~=-~- ~4~~ I~~~ ~~~~ U ~ I, ~ !~ STAFF REPORT - t1NIhL~,L CARE AND SERVICES DEPART i~SENT Date: November 5, 2008 RANCHO C,UCAILIONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care and Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES AND PROVIDING FOR A HARDSHIP FEE WAIVER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution that will (1) revise certain animal care and services fees, and (2) provide for fee waivers based on financial hardship. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On May 3, 2006 Animal Care and Service fees were adopted for the City's new Animal Care and Services Department. The fees were originally based upon San Bernardino County's fee schedule, which had been previously adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga when the County provided services. Now that the Department has acquired two full years of data on operational costs, modification to certain fees are recommended. These adjustments are necessary in order to maintain the current level of service and provide more cost effective operations, and are consistent with the City's No-Kill goal. The Fee Resolution has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. Staff has determined, and recommends that the City Council find that none of the proposed fees exceed the estimated, reasonable cost to the City in providing the services for which each fee applies. Following is a summary of the major changes recommended for approval at this time: Daily Boarding Fees This fee is paid by an owner when they reclaim a stray pet at the Center. It covers the cost of expenses incurred by the Department in caring for the pet while it has been at the Center including food and staff time. Our current fee of $8 per day does not cover these expenses and based on active costs and experience over the last two years, we are proposing that the fee be changed to $18 per day. Spay and Neuter Fees The current spay and neuter fee is $50. We have determined that this fee does not reflect the Center's actual expenses for either dogs or cats. Staff is proposing that the spay/neuter fee be $80 for a dog and $47 for a cat. P432 P433 CONSIDERATION OF RF_'SOLUTION AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SER\'ICF,S FEES AIJD PROVIDING FOR A IiARDSHIP FEE \VAI\'ER NOVE\7SER 5,2008 PAGE 2 Impound Fees This fee is incurred when an owner picks up a stray pet. It covers medical costs and staff time for processing and proper care of the stray pet. The current fee is $40, but it is proposed that in order to cover actual costs, the fee be raised to $42. For your information, over 1094 pets were returned to their owners over the last two years. Microchip Fee Returning pets to their owners as quickly as possible helps the Center keep space open for adoptable pets. To help with this goal, the Center offers microchipping services. The current microchip fee is $15. The City's actual cost is $25. It is proposed to change the fee for a microchip to $25 to recover the City's cost. This fee is still very reasonable and far less expensive than what one would pay to microchip a pet through a private veterinary office. Financial Hardship Fee Waiver In addition to amending fees, the proposed resolution will provide criteria under which the Animal Care and Services Director may waive fees relating to the surrender of owned pets and the reclamation of stray pets based upon financial hardship. Particularly in the current economic condition, the Center is finding that many individuals do not have the means to pay the required fees when surrendering a pet or recovering their stray pet. It is in the best interest of the pet that it be returned to the owner if it is at the Center. Additionally, if the Center does not accept a pet from an owner who can no longer keep it, the pet may be abandoned and suffer without proper care or cause a public safety concern. The attached waiver request form will set out criteria for granting such a waiver and establish a consistent procedure. The criteria are consistent with those used by the Community Services Department. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing, and adopt attached Resolution No. 08-210 revising fees for animal care and services and authorizing the City's Animal Care and Services Director to waive certain fees applicable to surrendering owned pets or reclaiming stray pets. The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public hearing at which oral or written presentations may be made. Notice of the time and place of the hearing for consideration of this matter has been properly provided, no valid request for mailed notice is on fle with the City, and copies of the data upon which the new and revised fees are based were made available to the public. All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resp/e~ctf/u~llyQsu~bmitted, GC 1/ U.k;.C~~- Joe Pulcinella Animal Care and Services Director Attachments -Proposed Resolution - Form to Request waiver of fees based on financial hardship P434 RESOLUTION NO. 08-210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING CERTAIN ANIMAL SERVICES FEES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DIRECTOR TO WAIVE ANIMAL SERVICES FEES AND PENALTIES BASED ON HARDSHIP. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore adopted fees relating to the care, adoption, maintenance, control, and disposition of animals within the City. After 2 years of operation, costs of providing such services have increased. Therefore, the City Council hereby finds that it is necessary to increase certain of the foregoing fees in order to more fully offset such cost increases. (ii) It is the City Council's further intent in adopting this Resolution to authorize the City's Director of Animal Care and Services to waive certain fees and penalties including but not limited to pick up fees, initial impound fees, daily fees, and owner surrender fees due to financial hardship based on criteria set forth generally described herein, and set forth in the Animal Care and Services financial hardship fee waiver form established by the Director. (iii) On November 5, 2008, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee adjustments herein. (iv) All legal prerequisites to-the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby finds and resolves as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby approves and makes the following fee adjustments: A. Daily Boarding Fee $18.00 B. Impound Fee $42.00 C. Spay and Neuter Fee (Dog) $80.00 D. Spay and Neuter Fee (Cat) $47.00 E. Microchip $25.00 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines that none of the fees identified and approved in Section 2, above, exceeds the reasonable, estimated cost of providing the service to which each fee applies. 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Animal Care and Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish a fee waiver application form and waive certain fees and penalties, as set forth below relating to surrendering RGresolution-animal control fees P435 owned animals and reclaiming stray animals due to financial hardship, for pet owners who have qualified for financial assistance programs such as WIC, Social Security, Disability, Welfare, Unemployment, or similar kinds of programs, or who have incomes under the HUD low income thresholds. The fees and penalties that may be waived, are as follows: a. California Food and Agricultural Code Sec. 30804.7 (unspayed/unneutered dog) civil penalty b. Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Pick up fee c. Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Initial Impound fee d. Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Daily fee e. Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Owner Surrender fees Except as revised herein, nothing in this Resolution shall otherwise affect any existing fee pertaining to animal related services provided by the City. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2008. Mayor I, ,City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2008, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga RC-resolution-animal control fees P436 Ciq' of Rancho Cucamon a _ Animal Care and Senrices~epartment ] 1780 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Request for Waiver of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Fees The Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department recognizes that under certain circumstances, citizens may not be able to pay the required fees because of legitimate financial hardship. To request a fee waiver because of financial hardship, please complete the information requested below and supply the required documents to verify status. As a public record, please note that this document may be subject to disclosure. I am requesting a waiver of the [description] fees required by the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department because of current, severe financial hardship. 1. I currently qualify for at least one of the following programs: _ W IC _ Social Security _ Disability _ Welfare _ Unemployment _ Other 2. _ I am currently in foreclosure on my only residence. 3. My income level is under the Low Income Guidelines of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Household Size Size (persons residing) 1 2 3 4 _ 5 _ 6 7 8 Gross Income Year $37,300 $42,650 $47,950 $53,300 $57,550 $61,850 $66,100 $70,350 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Name Signature Date Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Services Department Representative 70500 Civic Ccntcr Dr. • P.O. Rox 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 • "I'cl 909 477-2700 • I~ax 909 477-2849 • www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us P437 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ l~ RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Date: November 5, 2008 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential.(14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Development Design Review and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (1424 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Development Design Review and Conditional Use Permft DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Approval by Resolution by Ordinance Terra Vista Planned Community by the Planning Commission and Staff. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 and Amendment DRC2008-00161 as recommended A. The location is currently designated Office Space, but the land use amendment being requested would change the 2.90-acre portion to Neighborhood Commercial and the remaining 11.83 acres for Medium-High designation (has a separate application pending for market rate age-restricted residential condominium units). The requested commercial site drains to the south and is bordered by a wide 50-foot shared driveway with a gas station/convenience store and car wash. The proposed small center was approved by the Planning Commission on September 24, 2008, subject to the City Council's approval of the requested land use amendments and is designed with access via the existing "L" shaped shared access driveway, which provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The proposed architecture is consistent P438 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160 AND DRC2008-00161 - LEWISCOMMUNIIYDEVELOPERS November 5, 2008 Page 2 with the Terra Vista Town Center complex to the south. The project is designed with two buildings: the building adjacent to Haven Avenue is a single tenant (Fresh and Easy) of 13,969 square feet, and the second building is multi-tenant on the east side of the site that is 12,915 square feet in area. B. General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as: "The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be provided." The General Plan describes Medium Residential as "The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested amendment is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the .location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive. The General Plan Land Use Amendment carries a Master Plan requirement and a conceptual site plan and elevation that are included for both the commercial and residential planned areas (see attached Resolution exhibits for more information) and is consistent with the Planning Commission approved Neighborhood Commercial Center and the pending Tract Map and Development Review Application for the residential portion. C. Community Plan Amendment: The Terra Vista Community Plan identified a balance of uses, and the current amendment is reasonably compatible with southern neighborhoods discussed in the plan excerpt below emphasizing more mixed-use and higher densities. 1 £ Belaned' f ~M =_ 'To as ~._' - ^, development at Term vista , _ __ 4 rwd.nra ,'.I nthe ndrthem two neighhorh rrs a '^"' ~ +'y a proportion m ".~~ 3 ,, land U' devoted to cammerclal end,~mixetl uses,'' In P ; 5`{ '• J conjunction vdth commercial deveopment abn0 Foothill 1:3 > 9oulevaid entl tha IndustrW park to the south IFigure 111 71 ~" Foolhul ehd- COMMEPCIAL OFFICE r ,She fauiirel 'Sgt ` I~umd a,+t ANOMIXEO U$E ghborhoods.of Tema Uutaa t hown wkh.thek _ +- .: ~'- _(utl'complements af.leM USas lmFigureJlf~B ~ -- -- - iIOUPE III-) -_ ~ ~' - - .. flcMentiei Or,entmon for:NOrthem Nerphtiorhoods end ~ _ ~ - r+' - ~ .. - _'COmmerciel(MLxedLSa Orientrtion isrr5wthemNNphborl,oode - i D. Desion Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval, which have been included with the final submission included with this report. E. Technical Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval. P439 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160 AND DRC2008-00161 - LEWISCOMMUNITY DEVELOPERS November 5, 2008 Page 3 F. Neighborhood Meeting: A Neighborhood Meeting was held on June 26, 2008. Three residents attended. Three items were identified and addressed regarding lighting, delivery access, and landscape irrigation needs. See the attached copies of the sign-in sheets and meeting notes (in Exhibit A) provided by the applicant for more detail. G. Planning Commission Meeting: On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which no one spoke in opposition of and unanimously recommended approval to the City Council (Minutes and Resolutions are included for reference). H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Air Quality, Archaeological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FACTS FOR FINDING: All facts for findings are contained in the attached draft resolutions. CORRESPONDENCE: These items were advertised as public hearings in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. CONCLUSION: Approval of these Applications will not conflict with the land Use policies of the General Plan. The proposed uses will provide reasonably compatible uses to the area. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:LHlge Attachments: Exhibit A -Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 24, 2008 Exhibit B -Planning Commission Resolution 08-54 Approving General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 Exhibit C -Planning Commission Resolution 08-46 Approving Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 Exhibit D -Planning Commission Minutes dated September 24, 2008 Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 Draft City Council Ordinance for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 P440 r~ _ ~' - ~,. T H E C I T Y O F R A N~ C h ~O C U CA M O N G A Staff Report DATE: September 24, 2008 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of-Haven-Avenue-and-Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 2 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC - Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use PermiUDevelopment Review DRC2008-00163, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: The Commercial portion of the project has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .21 compared to a General Plan range of .25 to .35. The residential portion has a Conceptual Master Plan of 162 age-restricted dwelling units of 13.69 per acre which is under the range permitted under the requested Land Use Amendment. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); Multi-family development South - Office and Community Commercial; Vacant land and retail commercial East -Office; Office park West - .General Commercial and Mixed-Use (Office); Vacant land P441 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Office/proposed Neighborhood Commercial/Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) across Church Street South -Office/Community Commercial across Town Center Drive East -Office across Terra Vista Parkway West West -General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office Master Plan) across Haven Avenue D. Site Characteristics: The site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by vacant land designated Office (proposed Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)) to the north, vacant land and commercial designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) to the west, an office park designated Office to the east, and vacant land and retail commercial designated Office and Community Commercial to the south. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Shopping Center 26,884 5/1000 135 138 ANALYSIS: A. General: The location is currently designated Office Space, but a land use amendment is also being requested to change the 2.89-acre portion to Neighborhood Commercial and the remaining 12.11 acres has a request pending for Medium-High designation for market rate age-restricted residential units. The requested commercial site drains to the south and is bordered by a wide (50 foot) shared driveway with a gas station/convenience store and car wash. The proposed small PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 3 P442 center is designed with access via the existing "L" shaped shared access driveway, which provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Terra Vista Town Center complex to the south. The project is designed with two buildings; the building adjacent to Haven Avenue is a single tenant (Fresh and Easy) of 13,969 square feet, the second building is multi-tenant on the east side of the site that is 12,915 square feet in area. General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as; 'The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include: eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be provided." The General Plan describes Medium Residential as; `The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested amendments is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive. Community Plan Amendment: The Terra Vista Community Plan identified a balance of uses, and the current amendment is reasonably compatible with southern neighborhoods discussed in the plan excerpt below emphasizing more mixed-use and higher densities. :~ Bala f n:,n I=e To:essure the further cdinpatl development at Terra Vista with naighboring.comm r I ~~ .. the northern twn neighborhoods of Terra Ysta an residentiallyroriertted overall'ihan the tvw s< .neighborhoods:.~.ln the twn northern neighborhood: a... a Rd.. than the neighborhood commermal/professional cehU ii`- community uses in various .locations all devebpn planned to~be residential and open space 'In cont251 p I ~ southern two neighborhoods, a much higheGpmpol a ~lantl 'is devoted to commercial and mized;u$ .' conlunctiohwith comrirercial development !'along ~I - II nd,~l~.grr~' FIGURE III-7 - , ResidentiaFOriantetion for Northam Commercial/M uei4UseOriantation. L - `-BOUlevard.and the Yntlustrial park to the south ClFgure 11171:'<~_. L OFFICE _,. _., _, ~.. ! ~. ?• U§E 'The four neighborhoods of Terra Usta gra shown wth their'- fulkcomplements.of.land uses'.In.Flgure III•B, . ~I and .. _ - - ghborhoode '. - - ~ ... -- Development Review and Conditional Use Permit: The design of the Center and the conditional use permit as conditioned will provide for a shopping center that meets the following criteria: • Provides a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading ,lighting, and trash collection; • The Center has been planned as a group of two buildings with one major (Fresh and Easy) and one multi-tenant building. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 4 P443 • The Center is designed with one theme, with buildings and landscaping consistent with the adjacent Terra Vista Town Center (similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme); • The Center makes provisions for consistent maintenance, reciprocal access, and reciprocal parking through existing and condition easements; • The Site Plan provides a vehicle and pedestrian access that is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Details concerning the operations of the Fresh and Easy tenant are contained in the attached letter dated May 21, 2008, in support of a Type 20 ABC License which is required to be considered by the City Council as part of Public Convenience or Necessity Application (DRC2008-00475). Appropriate conditions have been included in the draft Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Resolution to incorporate the limitations outlined in the May 21, 2008, letter. Please note that the Conditional Use Permit Application DRC2008-00163 is for the shopping center and that a grocery store (Fresh and Easy) is allowed by right. Other uses that are not currently proposed but may be considered in the future that would require a subsequent conditional use permit includes, but is not limited to, wine and liquor stores, fast food restaurants, and restaurants with and/or serving alcoholic beverages entertainment or dancing. Tentative Parcel Map: The parcel map is to create a parcel for the neighborhood commercial development and appears consistent with this type of use. Two parcels are proposed that provide a building pad for each building. Phasing is not currently anticipated and, therefore, the shopping center will be developed at orie time. The size and configuration of the parcel is consistent with the use as proposed for amendment under the General Plan. Uniform Sign Program: A Sign Program has also been submitted as required by the City Development Code. The Uniform Sign Program has been modified to meet the requirements of the City Sign Code and the comments of the Design Review Committee. B. Design Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval with the modifications, which have been included with the final submission included with this report. C. Technical Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A Neighborhood Meeting was held on June 26, 2008. Three residents attended. Three items were identified and addressed regarding lighting, delivery access, and landscape irrigation needs. See attached copies of the sign-in sheets and meeting notes provided by the applicant for more detail. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Air Quality, Archaeological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 5 P444 public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FACTS FOR FINDING: All facts for findings are contained in the attached draft resolutions. CORRESPONDENCE: These items were advertised as public hearings in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Planning Commission consider the applications for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, to be forwarded to the City Council for final action along with a request for the Council to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Additionally staff requests the Planning Commission take final action upon (unless appealed) Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 and Conditional Use PermiUDevelopment Review DRC 2008-00163 as conditioned in the attached Resolutions, with approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 by minute action only. Respectfully submitted, ~R Jam .Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Site Area Map Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 Site Plans Building Elevation Floor Plans Exhibit F -Landscape Plans Exhibit G -Uniform Sign Program Exhibit H -Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit I -Existing Overhead Utility map Exhibit J -Fire Access Plan Exhibit K -June 26, 2008, Neighborhood Meeting Information Exhibit L -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 Draft Resolution of Approval for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 Draft City Council Ordinance for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163 Draft Resolution of Approval for DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163 fOL7'MC'B06 •7NIRSJr! LYLf'6LC'606 ~3MONd77L rods rrwram-~ vwnen •3nr wrtwnpr w acii 57f3d073A3O ALINfIlYMfOQ SlM37 ~ ~ ~. or1 +~ tTY1 JvlruYl ~ua-pro wr tuL~ w „w 7tMU )wgv7t dfu-Iti wr ~ 1AWlIh9 Y7wOR1'J'U LrOMY oooo-oox~w ar.~wr muwsa~ .~v!-um ~wi ors vwe ~unw~ nim-nor xn ~ raiao-~onzaw sn utamanuo non~w OI L~~ ~.~5 Lmi wet~+c e.»vu svtrua . _~ ~~~ P445 Rs ~ ~. ~ a R ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ =a ~a~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~0. a ~~ w~ o~ UO V ~~ ~~ ~~ ~m ti ~~ N~ ~~ 4 [-. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~h -`e~~ EXHIBIT A nrr d ~a jL n~rw t / ~'a++a f1L1'IIe'I0/ +37edr~YJ zYar •ur•eoe aNa+dn~ tore nNeaenn 'ormsn ry ~~ •~nrnn~Nnon .w Irrr sr3eo73naa ~uNnwwo~ srn+ai a.-+a .,~.~~.«,310a rlawov roar w do rdw runra+ tar-crr i r~Nao~nr~ 'roNOnr~no oNONru IN3Md073A3o 7YpN31YlY0~ rsroo-sooz~ba-dn~ L9l00-BOOZ JXO dql 73JXYd 3Af1Y1N31 L6LP/ MdLBnS 19Yb1 3.UIY/N31 sxam~o 1wrd raanev tuotem a~rgv a~~~ P446 8 ~ ~ 'e $ $ ~.F~..~rr-~ t ' ;~ ~ 'i i, ----'., p ~ d .a1 J~ ~a+~~_~n ~r~ c tY N0. ~' ~ J Y / nR~ _ LILY! M %AOr . a~~~ JBpBp ~~9~ ~e tl r s ~ 4'-'~iiM ~1 ~rk~~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~d f~~l~l~P~i: o~~~ ~~ _ ., ... ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~`° ~~~ ee 4~~ ~~ ~ w o er ~ ~~ ~ "'~ ~ ~ s ~~~~~ ~ L~ e N p~ ~4~a ~~ i~~~~ .. ~~ ~•r ~R ~~~P~ .r$Aa ~~ H~~ ~/ " : J ~ :, I e i . .-.I ~I r : ~i - 3 a , ~I ~ ;~I ~ , ~~ , ; , . % // r" • i ~ / N ..: ... /J/ /i. !~ ;~ ,~ y~ ~~ 9~ ~ `~ > ~~~~i~ '~ Sci~~~ ~ -, ~..... ' 1 :~ i[ ; ~l ~ ~. \1 ~~' I ' ?I ,,.:, F . W I - :, ! - I ~ , r: +. ~ • U! r. ~ ~ ---- _ - I 1 I `~ o ~, 0 a~ a~ I ~ ... k ~ ~ I~ i . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I. f ; ~ - ~~~ _ ~. ~,. •I ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ •, ~ I , Z ~' ~- r~--------~ I i:, `' ~ ~ W U ~ I . I Q I I I' I' @ WQ '- I ti I ~ I I I L _ ~~ ~ ~ , J ~ ~- ; U ~, • ~' V Q' ~ m ~/ ~~'~ ~ r ~ • I / w I Q ~ /. ,~ i ~. ' ~ ~ , / '' 1' ---J ~~ ~ °~ Q~ Q Q /~~~aT &~ t' z .r Q , ~ " ~ ., ~ ~ ~ ti ~ Qg~ d o-tir. ~~ $ ~ -~ EXHIBIT B ~.I i I, t ~ ~' '. r I: ~' F ~ '; ~~ '~ 7 1 i I 1 ~ i Y r ti .~ ~ `\ • ~ i 1 ~ r I - - _ ._ - _ - H~b~H~ _ -- Is / ~ -6f/ZfZ 9'r r99rt M' IJryr rn 2 W ~ ~~ ~\ Summary Land x2.90 AC x126,3395F Building 26,8843E Lund-to-Bldg Rofio 3.75/1 Coverage 21.2]% Forking Required 135 stalls Parking Provided 138 stalls Parking Ratio Provided Bicycle Storage Required 6.65 Provided ] Motorcycle Parking Req'd 1.5 Provided 2 Shopl OccupuncyMBType VB Maximum Bldg. Height 30 Major Oauponq MBType VB Maximum Bldg. Height 40' Shop 1 8 Malor A ore Commercial Buildings Legend ADA Pedestrian path ----- PropertyLine --- Trosh Enclosure Per Ciry Sbndard w/Trellis I Tronsformer Proposed Locution To Ba Oatarmined Lighf Fixture Pola 8 Surface Mounted Proposed Locotian °'O PT r r~ Existing Site Ta Remain V/ / /// Y/// /~ L/ .J~J PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN -Scheme A9 DRC 2008-00163 & SUBTPM 18797 NEC Haven & Town Center Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. MAJOR'A' ~~ IIV~/,//i //,/sj / // / ^: 9ALE9 AREA:I0RIA 9F h ! ///// L / /~ TOTAL AREA: 19,9699E / / / /// ~ //~ // /i I ~// - //// ~ i/ /~i WAREHOOSE: J,R33F i// / / - / / // /// /// ///// HAVEN AVENUE ~/~~~ //~/1 1 I /////// /////// // /// ,I / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / I it Landscape Areas i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j/ ,/ / ~// i , it Refer To Landzcapa Plan '//////// /////// Ill // / //// ///////// //// /// / ~ ~ ~' - ------------I -~.,,ma~.,..w..,...~.~,~ ~° a°~r,,..~,..,....~. .~,m~..., ~,.n,r. ,.," N R U E L ~; ~% -\ \~~ ~{Tf~~ TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ~ f f~~ Summary ~ Land 17.90 AC peildinp Land-fo-Bldg Ratio C Coverope rN _ Parking Required Parking Provided 2146,339 SF 76,569 SF 3.75/1 71.1% 135 stalls 13R dolls L_J =o_5.p~-AIL ~~ ~ ~h ~l ~ I ~ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN -Scheme A9 NEC Haven & Town Center Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. ~ ~~ ~ ,M. ~ NflOEt ~.°~r ~.,..~,.~m„ ® R E T R l t DRC 2008-00163 & SUBTPM 18797 i _ __ - . _...r ... a . - - __.~ s _ .. _ ~ ~~~~ Summary ~ Lond ±2.90 AC xR6,339 SF 9eildinp 26,569 SF Lond-to-Bldg Rolio 3.75/1 HAVEN AVENUE Coveroge 21.1% ~ Parking Required 135 slalls Parking Provided 139 slalls ~n70o Illy®G°I G~G~~NJC~~l17~G~J ~JU'~i PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN -Scheme A9 DRC 2008-00163 & SUBTPM 18797 ~d. .,.,~ .p.M~w IY t1 U t E NEC Haven & Town Center `"`°~°"""="Li'~ "", Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. i' f '?:"i'r''0 -.-.,,..,~.~ ~ R E T fl I l ~` °?t:,. ----_-_.-------------.e_.v____------°---- _ -- NEC HAVEN & TOWN CENTER RANCHO GUCAMONGA, CA. MAJOR A -SOUTH ELEVATION DRC 2008-00163 & SUBTPM 18797 Lewis.=.Retail Centers. a member of the Lewis group of companies SUIf: 1/P - 1'~P ,„.~ NflOEI ~~~ _ , RETHII v 0 AAA 1l1D A CA CT'CI C\/ATIl1 AI ivrv c -~ ~ a ' ~ ~.~;' ; SHOPS ,1 =.NORTH ELEVATION i- P454 W ~ S S W ~~ C 0~ ~~~pV $° :~~eyy° 'sye&a~ a~ ~gs~ ( ~ p.! .~i. D~ . ~ ' •~ t - a e s l exaG tt ~~~-x F~~ 1 , y tz 1 + L - I, .. H ER ~Y ~^ JJ 9 m "e ~~ i~ ~ i~t1 4 ;~ e I u ~a~~ b }g ~ I, ~ L ~ O J / ~~ itT1A/ S< a 7 {t ~ )~ ~ ~ ~~ k Y"~Z°' i~Y 1 ry~ W O - ~~ Y~1V Y ~ ~ ~ / J t VO'V~JNOWVOnOOHONVii ~; ~. E ` 3AIii0 a31N30 NMOl ~~=3 ° il~~!'il 3nN3AV N3AVH •~ O O 0 E Nona aanlxi_P455 5~ 0 ~~ ~ ~' ~e ~~ ,. ~ e° ~L ~~~ 0~ T l ~ o ~~ '~ ~ ~3P I ~ 33 ~ y3..-. I . +~ ~ a ~e I ~, 99 ~ ~$ :~ ~~ 6 ... ; j . - ~ ~ . .,.. I ~j ~ + ~ I I i ' I ~ ~ Fd ~-~ ~ } i I I I s ~ ~ f i -~_ gg I ~ +~ t° ~~ ~ .g 9g I I I I I I ~° s ~ ~ ~~ ++~ F-. t • I I , . + 8# ~ ~ ~...~,. ,. C~xg ~ 4 5€ ~~ ~ . 1 J ~ T a ~t ` ~ ~ Z p _ ~- ,- 1 ° 3 p \ \ ? ~ n o ' i I ~y~ I o NSF I ~'I o ~ I EXHIBIT E ~~ °~ ~ ¢/ ~~ Legend PRELIMINARY SHOP 1 PLAN (12,915 SQ. FT.) DRC 2008-00163 & SUBTPM 18797 NEC Haven & Town Center Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. --------» AAA Pedestrian posh ---- Property Line Landscape Areas Rater TO Landscape Plan .,. NflDEI ~~JI h'®® - •._ ®~w~l ~~ «~ _ ~~ ~ ...._...».~...m..a._~:.~:..~ea SITE KEY _ sc.ue: rir.i•.a• >® ................m.. .mamw:ea~r. rn ~ IWALE LOCARON = iER SCREENING ~ ZD PEDESTRIAN JC (Trot IAL/RETAIL _ AN CONNECLION I~I LIGHTED BOLLARDS (Tro.) BIOSWALE LOCATON ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN PANNG (iYP.J PARKWG LOt TREE DRIVE AISLE TREE~Tt U fi PERIMETER ucHTED eaungos LOCAlEO s' O. c. o ZEAO CURB MAIN tAIN AND ENHANCE E%ISRNG LANDSCAPE DIOSWALE LOCATION E%ISi1NG RIGHT OF WA' AND SIDEWALH N.A.P. PARNWAT RtEES AT 20' OC. PER OTT STANDARDS MONUMENT SIGN Haven and Town Center Rancho Cucamonga, Ca PROPOSED PATIO/OUTDOOR sEATNC AREA PLANT PALETTE E%ISi1NC SIDEWALK ® _~ ~__ r~ r~o..r y r v PEDESTRIAN <ONNECiION TO ., ®' ~~ `tea °"' °" ~- xr v LOWN CENTER DRIVE .~~rr ~+~^~ ^•~ w+ xr v PARNWAT WEES AT 20 O.G ~ ~"" v~r u... e~ xr x PER CITT STANDARDS //,,~~ ..~~... o-r ..-.~. e.... •r 12 CONCRETE s1EP OUi (iro.) 4!1 ~"'^"" ° ""~ '-'"- °` MQVVMENT 9GN y~ i ~ ~'r+' °'~ ~'~n ~' ~`r ~ 1K~~+n~~. ux r m t~~i ~ ~ T~ r xn aowa~m ~ _m.x. / t /F'li r.r .~~. ......... ... ~I .r..r?~ ~ ~..-.~- r....~. r...~. ARBgt ~ r~...a.x.+~..~.. ~....xrrmrrx•_ r^- COLORED CONCRETE ~ COMMERCIAL PARCEL coecRETE PAV[re5 - COLORED CONCRETE / ACRES: 290 eves RETAL SoACE 26009 q. It. ^ LANDSCAPE <OVEMGE ARBIXt Tauk 300V N~ Ik 2l.SS LIGHTED BOLLARDS ~ / PerkY~6 Meav: 33]52 s4 IL Z62f iTP. ` / PARRPIG PgOVIDEP. W spa<m CONCRETE PAVERS / ~~~® ..... s ~~ P EDESTRIAN PATH ,. ° ~~ Sh rN . LC-I ~ In/1 V x'' . 1 i ds i t, e~ ~s ~ e :f ki ' ¢ xa1 Y~"'fin ~ ~~ ~''t ~'~ ' ~ ~= T h ~, SIGN C R I T E R I A HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA r ( 4'a .-` a~ 5 '' 13580 Fitth Street Chino, CA 91710 Tef: 909.591.4742 FAX: 909.591.9792 Toll Free: 877.877.NSMC f 4rsri~~r;rt,>~>n~a\`~~r~ rr~rFrlrKrrr < - .,, _. ,. h, . , .._ ~_.. L ~ ... , HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER URIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA Purpose: The purpose of the following criteria is to establish a coordinated sign program that gives each tenant adequate identification, while achieving a unified, attractive appearance among all lease spaces. In order to maintain the integrity of the criteria and balance among all occupants, deviations Crom the criteria will not generally be approved. 2. Owner Approval: To secure Landlord's approval, Tenant agrees [o conform to the following procedures: a. Three (3) copies of the detailed sign design. One to be in full color of the proposed sign or signs, submitted to Landlord. b. The detailed sign design shall be submitted on sheets of 11" x 17". c. Submit copies to: Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Avenue P. O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Attu: Project Manager, Tenant Coordinator 3. City Approval: Prior to sign (abricatioq the occupant shall submit three (3) copies oC drawings of the proposed sign or signs to the City of ~ ~ I Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Eq 4. Permits: The occupants or the occupants sign contractor shall secure a sign permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia by submitting _ three (3) copies of fully dimensioned scaled drawings as follows:. - aS a. A site plan showing the location of the occupant space on the site. b. A detailed elevation of the occupant lease space drawn to scale and showing sign or signs placement and occupant space width, showing all _ '< colors, materials, dimensions and copy. _ c. Fabrication and installation details, including s[mctural and engineering data, U.L. electrical specifications. + £ ~S"_ d. Any other drawings, details and information as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 1; 9 ~ ~ C 5. Cos[ of permits: All pemtits for signs and the installation thereof shall be obtained by the occupant's sigu contractor and paid for by the occupant. ~, ~ a N °c 8 6. Compliance with Codes: All signs and the installation thereof shall comply with all current local zoning, building and electrical codes. ~ ~ U~ g o g C~ +%{t ~a3 Z:~~~ S I G N C R I T E R I A ~~ 1€r; ~rtrir; J a~, ~~ u .~ , ~;= HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER DR[VE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 1. Fasteners: All exterior signs, bolts, fastenings and clips shall be cadmium plated steel, aluminum, brass or bronze. No black iron or other rust prone materials of any type will be permitted. 2. Conduit Opening: All penetrations of the building structure required for sign installation and which have been approved in writing by the property owner of [he occupants premises, shall be neatly sealed in a water tight condition. 3. Labels: A U.L. label must be placed on every separate electrical sign element (each channel letter and/or sign cabinet). All required labels must be placed in a conspicuous location. No other labels are allowed. 4. Exposed lamps or tubing will not be pennitled. 5. No raceways or cabinet type signs allowed except for logo type cabinets. G. Concealment of Mechanical Equipmcut: Raceways, crossovers, conductors, Transformers and other equipment shall be concealed. 7. Repair of Damages: The occupant is responsible for the work of its sign contractors. 8. Responsibility for work: The occupant shall be fully responsible for the work of its sign contractors. 9. Cost of Electricity: Electrical service [o all signs shall be the occupant's meter and shall be part of the occupant's operational costs. S I G N C R I T E R I A I,~„~~tl QID z ~'~IIC'I D•L,~I o e:.d.i ~ -~iatq w ,.,.. w nn11111 O N Na ~ N F ;,a ~~ .Y~ x C ~: ~ ~ Nc~~E To~a~s es~„~ Z~~~~i ~~ 0 p,,.,,y ~IIP ~'dlf"~ .._d:.. ~ ~~~:"'~ w ~nntlll o ~ N ~ ~' N ° a ~~ F C ~i C H~~~ S~~g t 8~-`~ ~ °€ ~°,: ~+{l g~H z.~~~ ~~ ~~ HAVEN AVENUE 8c TOWN CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA ~ a N¢ b N 1. Substitutions: All companies bidding to manufacture and install an occupant's signs are advised that no substitutes will be accepted by the landlord whatsoever, unless so indicated in the speci5cations which are approved in writing by the landlord. Signs that deviate from these criteria without such approval must be removed at the occupant's expense. 2. insurance: The occupant's sign fabrication and installation company shall carry Worker's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance against all damage suffered to any and all persons and/or property while engaged in the construction or erection of signs in the amowrt of One Million Dollazs ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit. 3. Erection: The occupant's sign company shall completely erect and connect (including all wiring) the subject sign in accordance with these criteria and all local zoning, building and electrical codes. G ~: ~ ~ y~s~ m ~~~ Z~~~ S I G N C R I T E R I A J~~ / N Ems,: .. 1 _ kl lr~if ~fil [I ~~fl {,,: mow, u~:l Al t~tf l11.11~1:141 fi'~iN ~.w 'r-.i i~.~ .w ,. ~ - zn ...+T:.soh£s;nEtL~nr.S~F4;...i Z. _;..:.: ..a YF: e`: IIAVEN AVENUE br TOWN CENTER URINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 1. Approval Required: All signs shall be attached to the building only at a location approved by the landlord and the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 2. Main Building ID Sign: The main business identification sign shall be located on [he building fascia a[ a location approved by the landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA.. 3. Window Sign: The business identification window sign shall be centered on the store front glass nearest the main pedestrian entrance. The sign shall no[ exceed three (3) square feet or less than 10% of the window area, whichever is less, and shall be composed of white vinyl Helvetica mediwn lettering. Copy shall consist of name of business, hours of operation and emergency phone nwnbers. 4. Suite Number Sign: The suite number or address of the lease space shall be centered above the door 4" high with white vinyl filth. 5. Sign type: Tenants signs shall be composed of channel letters. a. The aggregate sign area (all signs on one wall) shall not exceed paragraph #6 below. b. Sandblasted or painted signs aze not permitted. 6. Tenant Identification Signs: The total sign areas allowed (or all tenant walls signs shall be as follows: one (I) square foot of signage per one (1) lineal foot of lease space. No sign shall exceed 80% of the linear lease space on any elevation. Each tenant shall also have additional signage on any secondary elevation that faces [he street or parking lot with a ntaximutn of I50 square fee[ per elevation. a. Major Tenant I) Quantity: One (1) intemally illuminated channel letter sign and / or logo will be allowed for each elevation. 2) Size: Maximum channel letter height for Major Tenant to be 4'-0". Total combined signage area for tenant shall not exceed 70% of leasehold for frontage and 30% of rear of tenants building elevations. 3) Location: Landlord shall reasonably approve location of Major Tenant signs which shall be in keeping with the architectural design of the building. Signs to be located only within the space and surface specifically provided for on the building. b. Multi Tenant 1) Quantity: Each nmlti-user pad Tenant shall be permitted a maximum of two (2) intemally illuminated channel letter signs and / or logos. Second sign is allowed only if placed on side or rear elevation. If the Tenant is located on an end space of the building, the Tenant may, subject to City and Landlord approval, install a third (3) chatmel letter sign, one (I)on each frontage. 2) Size: Maxnnunt height of sign is two feet (2'-0") for a single line sign and 2'-6" for a double line sign. Tenant shall not exceed 70% of leasehold width for each elevation. If tenant has a nationally recognized logo or layout that cannot be modified and cannot meet [he height restriction, the sign can exceed the height restrictions up [o a maximum overall height of four feet (4'-0"), but must be approved by the Landlord and the City. 3) Location: Landlord shall reasonably approve location of tenant sign which shall be in keeping with the architectural design of the building. Signs to be located only within the space and surface specifically provided for on the building. Materials: a Sign Face: Acrylic shed (i.e. Plexiglas). Landlord must approve colors prior to sign permit submittal. b. Letter return material: Aluminum, painted to match building colors or Landlord approved colors. c. Letter return depth: Not to exceed 7" from the face of the building. d. Trim cap size: ''/d' for 24" letters and 1" for 36" logo elements. Lighting: a. All signs shall be 30ma low output neon with no exposed tubing. b. All signs to be U.L. listed. S I G N C R I T E R I A ~ ~ N¢ • N S 8 IA C ~ ' i" fB° °'- ~~: C8 ~%E ~°„a~ yr ~~i g~i Z:~e~ ~~ ~~ w ~J ~r;rErlr~r ~1 RAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER URIVE RANCIIO CUCAMONGA CA FACE-LIT CHANNEL LETTERS (1'YP.) G.C to supply primary power sourcc .040 FABRICATED EMi ALUMINUM CABINET (WELDED AS NEEDED) DISCONNECT SWITCH TRIM CAP - MF_TAL n , --, 8 ~- TRANSFORMER BOX 3/16" ACRYLIC FACE - ELECTRO-BITS TUBE 6T0 WIRE NEON TUBE GLASS STAND _ Y."X1Vz" NYLON ANCHORS (4 PER Icttcr) WALL/FASCIA TRANSFORMER ALUMINUM FLEX W/ ELECiRO-BITS CABLE d GTO Faces: Face Lit Channel Letters or Semi-Individual Channel Letters; Acrylic to match approved colors. Trim Cap: Prim cap to match faces or Corporate colors. Returns: Paint to match faces & trim cap, building or Corporate colors. Logos: White Plexiglas face with 3M vinyl films. No color restrictions. 9 Y .~~ a eq#8 C ~: ~ ~ NFsa ~~g~$ o~ .0~~ z.~~~ S I G N C R I T E R I A 1 /2" HAVEN AVENUE be TOWN CENTER llRIVE ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA I MAIN I.D. TYPICAL STANDARD SIZE M1 SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' 124.7 SD FT J .A. .B. ,~~ ~p~ .E. 124.7 Sq H I I8.7 Sq H ~~~~~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~~ -- _--~ lA7SnR 54.950 F1 3135n F1 MAIN I.D. TYPICAL STANDARD SIZE - M7 LETTER "8~" FACES: 3/16" WHITE ACRYLIC W/APPLIED CAST LIME VINYL (VF13474) TRIMCAP: 1"GREEN PAINTED PMS 7496 RETURNS: .040 ALUM. PAINTED PM5 7496 BACKS: .177 CLEAR POLYCARBONATE ILLUM : WHITE 6ELCOre ULTRA LED's LETTERS "FRESH EASY" FACES: 3/76" WHITE ACRYLIC TRIMCAP: 1" WHITE RETURNS: .040 ALUM. PAINTED WHITE BACKS: .177 CLEAR POLYCARBONATE W/2ND SURFACE GREEN CASTVINYL(3630- 26) ILLUM.: WHITE GELwre ULTRA LED's BACKGROUND PANEL - PANEL FACE: .125 ALUMINUM PAINTED PM5 7496 MATTE FINISH PANEL RETURNS: .090 ALUMINUM PAINTED PM5 7496 ILLUM: GREEN EXCEL lED SYSTEM HALO AROUND PERIMETER HIDDEN IN FABRICATED CHANNEL W/.177 CLEAR LEXAN COVER 'CLOCK' LOGO - FACES: Vh" FORMED WHITE ACRYLIC W/APPLIED LIME GREEN CAST VINYL (VF13474) AND VIVID GREEN CAST VINYL (3630-156) (OUTER DARK LINE). ALL CLOCK HANDS, INNER RING AND LEAF BORDER HAS BLACK VINYL (1St SURFACE) UNDER VIVID GREEN VINYL. TRIMCAP: 1-GREEN PAINTED PM5 7496 RETURNS: .040 ALUM. PAINTED PM5 7496 BACKS: 177 CLEAR POLYCARBONATE W/2ND SURFACE GREEN CAST VINYL (3630- 26) ILLUM: WHITE GELcore ULTRA LED's S I G N C R I T E R I A N Z U O U w n ~wle o~ eY~ gF€ C ~s ~ ~ C~`~~~ °°~<2~ Za$x ~~ ~~ `~ la~~r~tf HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CEN"CER DRIVE RANCHO COCAMONCA CA F~ hi IM Isa IN" T f I)~' S Y r 4n4 • ~ F' 3 •a . ~': MAIN I.D. TYPICAL STANDARD SIZE S7 SCALE: N.T.S. 125 SO Ff I 1/ I/].. (1'-IIRiH VI rl' ~~ >I ~.~~Ir~~ ; `------------------------- FACE -EDGE OF LEAF DETAIL I /I/'IR rl'-Il3 ~.l rp~per~ IYI I- r-vr Y- Y PI wy ly~H l[ry%ir~M}N[ FACE -EDGE OF CLOCK DETAIL ~{ CLOCK LOGO DEfNL U V] 1 LEIIDt3 oErwa •FxcepMo-u- '6• Cfeo BacK No Vhry1 r el _ S I/~'Dmin Hde 45 P~ IN"Dmin Nde M1vnavak CONR1016 wnwcH® ro wAu I ,` `~ i PAN PNH ~ RUSH MOUNI® IO WALL WALL MOUMING DETAIL boXS O ~ ~m N¢ N IDOnmM'et LOCaHavl W } u» ugwme IQm + g 11UrwYiq. E (oo-carnect/PNllarl uL ones ohaeeled Wal comecMm to be - ~ i 1 apgoryMe to wal comM1UClbn sin E 19b IpxLic - b be tlelmlileG by pb dlsdQ - C 2 it ~ e~ - ~ PmHw wllllm e asvl IEV rnllarsl - fAc~n $E u O yae EXPANDED S IDE VIEW ~ '~'~ ~ ¢y'~ SCNE: NIS g ~ e n= E S I G N C R I T E R I A ~-o ~ ~ m rn LOGO COLORS SC11E: N13 1~~'~«~~rr~~ ~~ ~r~r~~ ~r HAVEN AVENUE ~ TOWN CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONCA CA n'h" 3- I'h" r s MAIN I.D. TYPICAL STANDARD SIZE M1 su[E Vd'-ra Iz[.r son 1 ~ ~~ T IT fi n; ~ ~~. ro~ '- I r.rwer>e.[[.m , FACE - EDGE OF LEAF DETAIL I L ~+am~ I _IR 1 I ~ ~~ ; ~ d- }- # a..++mar..+ww.~ I FACE - EDGE OF CLOCK DETAIL LOGO COLORS SGIF: Ni3 Q IETEFS NEUu 'ecws~zrt- •a• aeozarA No vEn+ vrm~,la. - s i 1 Ren~P.~rtMe Illtq 0cb Trykd sM+rN MM]NCw I1M ~FMNNbiO PO[~M+ aM]ipl d0ucM ENLARGED MOUNTING DETAIL scve: rns sp«. n btlM I EamO~l 12ly MFy IN~unnlarl wa ~ba appcpl'+le to wm cpvpucNwl I~w dlc-b USesiwrtaNe[ryppe tf mnvz~.mllt+s• a [a Rr Olllsn) ~~ wALL MOUMING OEf.VI EXPANDED SIDE VIEW ]GHEE: NR RA41 / f APR / PPA9[31 COAT ® me-awsnsO WEx raax MAIEPVIS'~ALOMMOAI WPN4NWM .06]' NLI.T.VM I-K'Nmun MqY .lu re..a..~ o9oram.[n IMILIIWS/ACRfl1C +~ tA'IMVSWCFNI WI(IE ap in a&n IESPN ~0 wraiswaocs © ]M-LYm 6mn~V11]d]d ® ]N-Mb Grten~3W0.150 ® ]M-fism-]WPM ® ]N-Bb[t Nry111TOe`Mtl 4[en) 6311L@dAIION ® cEtme was wNlE lEw ® cEECm EttaraEEx lEw S I G N C R I T E R I A ii"~~ T -ya .e i~ 8 Yy Y! C ~ °~ e~~'£~ Di W® z a 8§iPa ~~ V 1Lrir~r~r~ ~~ ' J HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONCA CA 9'-O' B O.. 6'-O" !~ TENANT TENANT * 'FRESH b EASY" STANDARD TENANT PANEL LAYOUT TENlNi PIIlELT w/i!•lpQ MONUMENT ELEVATION PHOTO NTS ro x vo 5'.p O ..-e.. I s m~ s ~ s' e 24"-I ~ h~ ~ • •• ••• llj" I i FIRST PRIORITY LAYOUT ,r~ a (4) REO'D- ~ TENANT PANEL DETAIL scale aa~ = r-o' ss so FT ' m`'`~`O CCOPF OF WORK' MANUFACTURE & INSTALL (2) TWO SETS OF WHITE ACRYLIC FACES FOR EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN. BACKGROUND GREEN TO BE 1 Z ARLON 2500.112 OLIVE GREEN VINYL OVERLAY WITH COPY 8 LOGO 3 WEEDED OUT. FIRST SURFACE VINYL GRAPHICS APPLIED TO ~ WHITE ACRYLIC. F 6 * COLORR AS PFR~ ^ i a 8 1 'FRESH 8 EASY' WHITE ACRYLIC PANEL COLOR CHART AND DETAIL Translucent Ynyl Color SpecifimUons 1.0 • IL'. J1 ...rn. w.~.w TFM•T PMEIS w/e TAW!! NjiF: oe.a+.i..:•mawn. .. ~` 1"a _ j ~ NOtE: .'j,..., • n...Mi.. .. 2sY3e0dW6f i ' ~iN~~ ~. v.va.' 1'oc.~j i ~: a - - . _.....- R~ e m0~ uA. tiewl ~ tltlC Ilnngl VIII' i N 'III{III ~ () Dp',I~ ~ I,:,d.,l ..~nnll w Ilm w nnlllll Y~= °P 0~ S~Y 1~0 3 g„~ Zl~~ •~ S I G N C R I T E R I A~ ~ ////// ~rn _ SNOTS OINOtl103~3- ,Vy ~~~ uwa aunu®uln Imw P469 ~~ gppyg2 :suU ~:VI~VS T/LIT :ru6Rq 26L6'16SE08Ly l>L~'165'6061LL ~~~ - ~_ 9H NOII~IIILLSNO~ ""W~9'3 '~V111uro~ay ~Vd CLt6 YJ'WIV~'MNS YWI OBSCI > _ < 5 OQSZZi nwu tliuinowaitl :nwmdv w•m a~el u U61S` ~ Y0~ "~:.~ y - H ~~• 0 ~ /Slp~y°~ w 1_ F„ gyp' ;' . - WL K ~ A. )E F +~' ~ ' 3 W,.. F~1 x I f I I ~~ h i ..iSpir..~ars.-a-r f i ~ ~ `R 4 0 ~,'. ~~i. ~`^ ..~., ,. ~~ .~ :~ _~ z• Fz ;i as o ~• ~ ~ '~ z ~~ C U O ® ~ V U ~S '"'I~ W ~ ~>f F'° ^ m ~ i z i p N 0 t$ ~P3 ~A Y"'! ~o a ~~` r k ~ =~ NFL„ ~~~~ ~~~~ o=~ ::. ~ a m z.~~~ ~~ V O P471 fF~~rtrEr HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER URINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA Specifications: MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL TWO NEW D/F ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGNS. ALL NEW MONUMENT ELEMENTS TO BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING TYPICAL MONUMENTS ON SITE. MONUMENT CABINET AND TENANT PANEL RETAINERS TO AL50 BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING. TENANT FACES TO BE .090 ALUMINUM WITH TENANT NAME ROUTED FROM FACE AND BACKED WITH RED TRANSLUCENT PLEX #2793. NEW SUPPORT POLE(S) AND CONCRETE FOOTING TO BE A5 PER APPROVED ENGINEERING. ACTUAL TENANT COPY T.B.D. MONUMENT LOGO EMBLEM TO BE ROUTED FROM ROOF ELEMENT WITH CLEAR PLEX PUSHED THRU AND TRANSLUCENT VINYLS TO MATCH APPLIED FIRST SURFACE TO LOGO FACE ONLY. 9'-0.. 8'-O" 6'-0" TENANT~i TENANT ®® D/F ILLUM. MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SCALE: 3/8' = I'-0' mra.L .i~asx MATCH MONUMENT COLORS TO BUILDING ON SITE. COLORS T.B.F ~-2'-8"i N ~- 24" -~ „ ~ !iVR" F 416 i " il, `I N "~'a'lp e.`Fx IIII' V ~ ' ~I,I,.I~ zo - N~nnll ~ m.. w a ~ 6"51NTRA E al -I- ~ ADDRESS _ r ;, ~ ° NUMERALS s ~ ~ _ 3 E ~~~ ~3.,- ~ I I Y ~ ~ 3. 8 _ AKLON 2500~1120LIVE GREEN (PMS A]496J pv 5 ~ q ~3MVT139]4LIMEGREEN(PM9R3BI) ~ ~~ ~~~ 1 ~ to March ExlsrlNG ~ ~ ~ _ RED PLE%R29T3 _ yi r 'I N ' - -•rv ®3M N9630~2H6 TEAL GREEN / PM5 p322 ~ S 3M R3630-]6 HOLLY GREEN F pppp 88~ ` ~1 ' u 3M p3630~255UNFLOWER YELLON/PMS p123 ~ Cou u~ E ` 3M R3G30~440RANGE/PMS al655 Qog ga ~ S 3MA',.630~]3 pARFREp y+ry ~~? Z ~~~ tl S I G N C R I T E R I A ~ N >;:f l J HAVEN AVENUE & TOWN CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA O 10 12 11 13 SCALE: 3/e' =1'-0' O O O O O 0 O w COLORS 8 MATERIALS ROOF I, US iIUi CGFVANY TWO-PIECE MISSION $TTIE; IBOOI f5I~95~B 60%hNILORU BIfNO, AO%REO BU:ND PAINT COLORS ]. DUNN EDWARDS OFW]IB TEARL WHITE' J. DUNN EDWARDS OFCI~S YNAPARPAI' ~. DUNN EDWARDS OEOTl 'BAKED POTATO' 5. DUNN EDWARDS DECTN TRIAR TUCK' 6. DUNN EDWARDS DES16] SONOM SHADP 7. DUNN EDWARDS OE610R wnolf wNEwr B. DUNN EDWARDS DF5656 'WREATH 9. SNERWIN WILLIAMS SW00~6 (WOOD SGPE37 TINE CONP FABRIC AWNING 10. SUNBREUA ! BBOOJ GIEN MVEN CRIMSON RfD' FIRESISTNW I1. SHNBRfIIA 188010 GIEN RAVEN TEAL&UP fIRESIST NUV CERAMIC TILES I:. DALnIE R Dm 9lUE MOON 13. DAllltf A D19] 'AEGEAN H! .o i~ F 8 Yx X s9so e~ _~ y~3~ ~~g O~¢e Z:"&~ S I G N C R I T E R I A ~~ A V W Nvu ~:emae r.~rudnna~ rrr-ur, N'r v nlvarv~vov :nmvr~ 1PL 1'6li'606 OMV16)I]I role rwvanm nNran ,m mRyl "Ur M/rlN/pn 'M BG11 Sa3d0'1Y.30 AIINIIRROJ STMT ~-roe.-a~310~ „~.~N ~NOnroro oNJNra RNNOann ~r , 1N3Rd073A30 7YlJM3RR00 rsloo-aooz3aa-dnJ 29 1 00-8002 JNO Nrld ONIOrNJ 7r/Ild3JNOJ ~e~a! nd~sns lJrdl 3nur~N3z .ammo .vu nvvw sNaum m..m ~~ P474 g~~~ ~ 4 €~@ A ~¢ 8a` ~gd ~@ dB III I I ~ al,~~ ~'' P B 9 I , • 'b ' 1\ m ~ ~~ y Bb R ~~~o ~~ a Cggg~g~ ~~~Rah 3 ~~~~~~ ~ ~°'~agC ,~ ~ eh 4~~ ~~ ft; W p bC ~ ~b~ h ~ ~~ h B~, £ p 4 ~k ~~@Av Efle {"4 ~ ~eB~ {@ g@ R ye ~° g9p e8~ ~S@S ~ ppggggggSa a39tl~ e~{{@ ,@~@ gpA I a BBE@i{$@I@€{{{ Bfl@@@~9fl@@{6~s4@ S . Fc'c ~ ®~ •'a•Re~dl i; $EE ~e a•R a4 ne.• 9 4d @~~~ 5p __ ~ ~fEllf{iE t{fl@@Efl{@@B{{{s@a{{~Q@{ I~I I .... Atl.~S..:: ii E:Y$t :.. __ t `@{ ,a -~ g~~Ee 4 R ~~ ~ L ~ ~@ o R 5 da _ ~~ tE` 4~~ s a -~ "{ i _ ~~E ~~~ fls t • -- flE I~E ,t ~~ g~a 4 `~ ;~es 7 6 sflp@~ Eli I ~ I' pp~p°i rrRa gg kg° s• ' I ~py~pfl p.vv .. 'j~lll. t~' a gF@9 1tl1! ~p 'j ~ I I~Ii ~ R ~ {~@ y~ a {~ L y ~~fl4@~ ge~~ ,I : ~',, s III i I r ~ ' ~ a I ~ bg~ ~@E e$ ~ ~ fl p a $ ii6~3[ 6@{[ 0..•, q ~ ~ ~~,, fly ' _,~ ~ -..,;,.~~%~J ~% r, .~~ // / _' ! . `~~~~ 13~i,19 I ~., k, r ¢ ~ I ~ :~i,~~l ~~{~o~~ ~'@ %, ~ q~ ~~ k r a 11, ~~~ i r~ I .IVY I „.. , x~ I ~ ~ 'I~-----~`~ ,. ,, ,~, 1 ^ I r ~I EXHIBIT H n`Is, ~a~,' ,.. G -; ~ ~ ,.,. y, T^1 ~~~ ~i`q•S-^+j '~ r ryry Yi?$ l ICY f -i-~..-,.71 I s -: ; II ~I ~~ jai' I J I ~I A II f F~:q yye GE h n I ~ ~ I 'I ~l e i A gg ;II ° ~ I ll Ip wanly fi ~I 'h ~ I - ,: I ~~ I I I':i.l~ ~ ' ~i i. v Is P475 EX/ST/NG OVERHEAD UT/L/TY MAP RESID IIAL ~ ~ ~ ~ {C{iUiT~ R E t ~ J~fj ""' ,.-.- ~ ~~ ~ %a / ~ ate ~r ~"\\ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ND. 18608 f 1.8~ Ac. /~ ~or~v -~ut /~ /, 1 2.90 Ac. aosr. ~~ ~ SCALE IN FEET a iao zoo aao LEGEND ~( 1455 AUTO CENTER DRIVE MA D O L E SUITE 200 ~ ONTARIO, CA 91761 ~ ~ t 909.937.9151 •' _-~--.~.~i..n !'nmmnnltlQf fO(' LIIC www.madoleinc.com 66KV 66KV OR LARGER ELECTRICAL LINE E ELECTRICAL T TELECOMMUNICATIONS • SUPPORTING POLE - - - EXISTING UTILITY LINES ---- EXISTING PROPERTY LINES stT>= o.,~ inmARY ~~ a ~~ ~~ .~.,~.., nen~zre ~eoe :]rmmr~ znzi'aza'coa nxoxanv nzle nxxwnn •axndn w®,IUu 'NI x/I[N/IM 'N 9G 11 SN]d0'I]A30 ll/NOInYOJ SIMT .m.~~,m,3104 vex YINN031]YJ 'YDNOWYJ/IJ OHJNYd LN3Wd0]3A30 ]YION3WW00 eeloo-eooz~ao-dna 29 1 00-8002 OMO NYid 1N3W[NYd)0 3blJ L6LHl Wdl9n5 LOY6L 3All Y1N3L zxxlo cvu ~ suauia+ .aenrua P476 a G \~ k ~ s a~~ ~ ` ~~ egF {T 8 ~ li i IFE~+! 11 'j ~+~a'g E ~ ~ e ~° i i d~l$~f I it Yee m S' S ~ yy r ~ C ~ !Y ~9! ~d ~ 5S i~iggggl ~ ~ .! `~&~3~ Y ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ k 1~ I~~~geiiE, if, ~~f 7 e§~~". ~~C i I IS i i m snxuc$ N`~ ~e ~ . '' ~ fi :idalL~ 1 ~ (E Hhtl~8~ ~ t ~~~ pp ~: rwJinxxxanm ~ __ ~ ~I ~~ E t"~r ~ ~ ~!'~~98~ii~d-;~4fj~ ` ~,.~~ ;E 8:^_. € ~~YY BI ~ E ~g c !$ -- ra : ~ ~ 3 t ~ ~ ~ / ! ~ ~ ~ ~i: ~i~ ~o ~ b ~ ~ z~ s ~ Y \ / y ~~ ~ it ~ ~ _ ~ ~~\ ~~ -~ ~ n~.i 4 ~ V = i ~! _ s ~ W U ~~a. ~ ~ ~.,a f• Y ~ ~ ~. ~~ I o eoY3 s ~ YIA 8~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ / ~~ ~ {Yi~~ab~ 1 ~ ,, 1 ~i fY, LZ7 o aC I / I j,~, % / !. G. ~~/r- .;a~~ ~~ ,~ 1 ~~~ ~ I ~, ~I 1~.. ~~~~ ~~ .~~~j_I L ik~l >' ~fV i~~~f'L 1 'Ei` ~ji vii Er o ~""~ I 1 ~ ~ _ y~ y~~,~„ix' 9 S'~ N~.~~(L j '~I 1 ~~ v. ~1 __1_ i`'" r i/ li E`17 t i t I I Er ~ C 4 i-J / I/4 '4~ II a I it s .L L 4 . ,a ~_ I i i I ` ~ °~~ 'I I V ' .~ H ~ ~ a ~ I, z-~. II ~~ I i ~\ ~I ~-~ I lid I c ~ li i ~ I I ill , ~ !/ ~ _ _ 1 ~~ I '2i ~. I~'~ {III I \\I~~ ~1`\ .~' I 1, ,. I i I \_._ i l I // I s L _.. i IL I~ J~\ !!'~ CCC"'I ~ E-;A .~ t dpi, l LL I ~ ( ~~ ':~~~ i a~t. .l I r I/ r d ' - ~ it } ~ ~, III i l I EXF~I~IT J ~P~w/D~ P477 Proposed Haven Square Retail Center Neighborhood Meeting Agenda Introduction o Project Goals and Objectives Project Team o Lewis Retail Centers o Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Project Summary o Site Area: 2.90 Acres o Total Leasable Area:26,884 square feet o Fresh & Easy:13,969 square feet o Shops 1 Building: 12,915 Tenants o Service Related Tenants (Shops 1) o Quick Service Restaurants (Shops 1) o Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Store (Major A) Site Architecture o Site Layout o Architectural Theme o Fresh & Easy Elevation o Shops 1 Elevation o Site Sustainability (Anticipated Design Features) o Pedestrian Friendly Site o Bicycle Racks o Preferred Parking for Alternative Vehicles /Car Pooling o Light Pollution Reduction o Drought Tolerant Landscaping o Low Flow Fixtures o Diverting up to SO% of Construction Waste Disposal Project Schedule o Construction Start: 1`~ Quarter 2009 o Grand Opening: 3`d Quarter 2009 Q&A EXHIBIT K Lewis Retail Centers a member of the Lewis group of companies DRAFT 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 Upland, California 91785-0670 909/949-6703 Fax: 909/912-8159 June 16, 2008 Subject: Proposed Haven Square Retail Project -Neighborhood Meeting Thursday, June 26, 2008, 6:30 to 7:30 pm To whom it may concern: We cordially invite you to an informational session for our proposed Haven Square retail project to be located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center.Drive. This session will be held in the Ruth Musser Middle School Multipurpose Room located at 10789 Terra Vista Parkway, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. We welcome this opportunity to inform you of our proposed retail project and look forward to meeting you in person. Sincerely, P478 Luis A. Gomez Director of Retail Project Development y ~Y~w ~~': l • ~~ ~.o_~z~O~ MAJOR A -SOUTH ELEVATION A MAJOR A -NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -MAJOR A NEC HAVEN & TOWN CENTER RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. Lewis Retail Centers a member of the Lewis group of companies NHOEL °~ _.,.,.m.K.~. , R E T fl i l -v A V rD MAIOR A -EAST ELEVATION MAJOR A -WEST ELEVATION ~~ W 0 LLu.`x 2~ gnn~ ~ ~ t~ ~`-~~1. ^ ~~ SW ~4~h an °Y~~ I ~ I.~\ ~ !! !~ Zm r, - a m _ iY! tl nnn ..._ ~ ~ .~`.. 6dg ~ \ ~ yE .~ . ~ ~ 9, ~~ e9~ s o m ~ $ v ~9~55 t & f~ 1~ d. vii 990°8 ~e~~~ ~ ~° ~d ~: ~ ~f Jl 9~ Ifl~. d~ F~ /'L~_-_-___-~- O/ .. ` .```: ~." ... ." ~` ~ v~N ~ :: :.~ ..`~: ` N ~' ~ ~ ~` ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -yy sfii;;: m .,0.7 _ _ ,~ .. w i °'' ~ ~ ~ ~ N.n- ,~' tits, t~ ~ _ ~ = i O . ;;:; ~ ~ p ~ .. ~ py yy n ; 1 El,. F iP~ ~ ~ A ij ~' ~ ~~ 4 i $ i ~ ' IY '. a ~ _ ... I I~ N ~ z ~ C ~ ~ V 3° I N ajf m L ~ y E ~ Z a ~ i ~ 2~ ~ U I w w c a Z~ P480 Proposed Haven Square Retail Center Neighborhood Meeting Sign In ~/Z~p ( Name Print) ~ ~ Address Phone Emafl Address 2 _s~~h~ ~ ~s.~s~.~~~,~~. R. e .; say- ~~ -~ f ~_,, 3iy~waTl.~~LTt.~~ ~ ~~~ ~~'yz-Wwh~ Lf 12(i 1 90~j-5!S ~S _~~ ~ >=1Tta2 4-vC. 4i ~ _-- 5 __ 6, ~~ $ --- ---- - - ~ 9'--- ~ 10~- - 11~ - 12' - -- --- - - 13 f ..---- ' ~ 14 j ~ i 15 ---------- - -- 17; ---....__ i 18 ---- - -- - i 19 -_{ ----- _-_. ~ _201-_ -_ . I _ -___ 21! - ---- --_ ' I I 22+-------- - ---- i ------~-------~- ---- 23 ~ ------- - ------ - ~ - 24; i i I ~ ' c~~,~ v A P482 Proposed Haven Square Retail Center Neighborhood Meeting Agenda Public Comments Mr Beiter 1. What is being done to minimize parking lot light into neighboring residential areas? 2. Is the site designed to allow for proper delivery truck access? 3. Will Fresh & Easy utilize condensate generated by the refrigerant to irrigate landscape areas? Responses 1. Lighting standards will be kept to a maximum height of 20 feet and will utilize reflective shields as necessaryto minimize light reflection. 2. Yes. The site has been designed to allow full truck turning capability throughout. 3. No. However, landscaping will consist of drought tolerant landscape to minimize water consumption. P483 ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City olRancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use fhe tab key fo move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuantto City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The projectapplication will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains Project Title: Fountain Glen /Haven Square Name & Address of project owner(s): Church Haven Company, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 Name & Address o(developerorprojecf sponsor.' Lewis Community Developers 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 Contact Person 8 Address: Fountain Glen: Garth Chambers, Lewis Planned Communities I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inifial Study Partl.tlocPage 1 of 10 Rev. 3!17/04 EXHIBIT L P484 Haven Square: Luis Gomez, Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Debby Linn Linn & Associates 826 Molino Ave. Telephone Number Consultants Beach, CA 90804 562-433-9444 '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundahes. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the phmary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project location (describe): Generally located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street in the Terra Vista Planned Community of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1077-422-01, 1077-422- 46, 1077-422-94 'S) Gross Site Area (adsq. ft.): 14.72 acres '8) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications). 14.72 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The project is a proposal for approval for a General Plan Amendment, Community Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Parcel Map as described in the project narrative attached. 8) Include a description o/all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental I:IPLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.docPage 2 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. P485 agencies in order to fully implement the project: General Plan Amendment, Community Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit (commercial uses), Tentative Parcel 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs ofsignificant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/orhydrologicstodies, biotic and archeological surveys, tragic studies): The project site is bounded on the north by Church Street, on the south by Town Center Drive, on the east by Terra Vista Patkway, and on the west by Haven Avenue. The project site is relatively flat and contains no significam plants or animal species. The project site is transected by the Deer Creek Channel, a San Bernardino County Flood Control District facility. An existing automobile service station is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive and will be incorporated into the proposed project. Existing residential, community commercial, and office park uses are located adjacent to the projecc site. 10) Describe the known cultural and/orhistodcal aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published repoRs and oral history): The site has been previously graded and there are no known cultural and/or historical resources within the project site. I:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 3 of 10 Rev. 3117/04 P486 11) Describe any noise sources and theirleve/s that now affect the site (aircraft, roadwaynoise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: (See attachment) 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Refer to the Project Summary for the General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment included as pan of this application. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical; or scenic aspects. Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity o(land use (one-family, apartmenthouses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): (See attachment) 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? (See attachment) I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUN7ER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 4 of 10 Rev. 3/17!04 P487 11) The existing noise environment includes traffic noise, predominantly generated from Church Street, Haven Avenue, Terra Vista Parkway, Town Center Drive, and other local streets in the project vicinity. Ontario International Airport is located approximately 3 miles (mi) southwest of the project site. Aitcra& [akeoffs and landings at the airport contribute intermittently to the ambient noise in the project vicinity. Aircrafr noise does not result in any significant noise impacts on the project site. A noise study has been prepared and submitted as part of the project application evaluating existing noise impacts to the project site, potential noise impacts associated with implementation of the project and recommended mitigation measures for the project Existing traffic noise impacting the project site originates from motor vehicles and is generated by engine vibrations, interaction between tires and the road, and exhaust systems. Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Terra Vista Pazkway, Church Street, and other local streets compose the dominant source of traffic noise contributing to ambient levels in the project vicinity. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) highway traffic noise prediction model (FHWA RD-77-108) was used to evaluate highway traffic-related noise conditions in the project vicinity. This model requires various parameters, including traffic volumes, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry to compute typical equivalent noise levels during daytime, evening, and nighttime hours. This screening-level traffic noise model assumes that the noise sources and receptor (contour) locations are at the same level, and provides the distance to the noise contour without any intervening structure. Based on past experience with traffic noise projections using this model, the projected noise levels using "soft site" conditions have been close to the calibrated noise measurement results; therefore, no calibration is necessary For every model run at this screening-level analysis. For a more site-specific, detailed analysis with known receptor locations, the calibration can be done with noise measurement and concurrent traffic count. Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volume along Church Street, Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Terra Vista Parkway, and Broadmoor Place are listed in Table D of the noise analysis prepared for the projec[ site. The resultant noise levels are weighted and summed over 24-hour periods to determine the Ldn values. As shown in Table D, traffic noise along the roadway segments in the project vicinity is moderate to high, with the 60 and 65 dBA Ldn traffic noise contours extending beyond the roadway right-of-wa}' for most roadway segments. The 70 dBA Ldn contour extends beyond the roadway right-of-way only along the Haven Avenue segments evaluated. P488 13) The project site is bounded by commercial and office park uses on the east and south, single family and multi-family residential uses on the north, and residential and office uses on the west. Due to the nature of the surrounding existing developed areas, there are no known significant plants or animals located within the vacant areas adjacent to the project site and no known cultural, historical, or scenic aspects associated with the vacant areas adjacent to the project site. Plant, animal, cultural, historical, and scenic aspects ofthe adjacent properties developed with office, communirycommercial, and residential uses have been previously evaluated as part of the project approval process by the Ciry for these developments and any impacts in these areas have been mitigated with development of these areas. 14) The proposed project will not change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project. Residential uses of a density and type consistent with residential uses located north of the project site are planned in the northerly portion of the project site adjacent to existing residential uses. The existing DeerFCreek Channel serves as a physical buffer between existing office uses located on the west side of Haven Avenue adjacent to the project site. The planned commercial uses for the project site are compatible with the existing office park and community commercial land uses located adjacenc to the project site on the east and south. P489 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? The short term and long term noise impacts associated with the project, and the recommended mitigation measures for the project have been evaluated in the "Noise Impact Analysis" dated February 2008 prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. for the Fountain Glen project and submitted to the Ciry as part of the project application. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The project site has been graded per a previous design and does not include the removal and/or replacement of any mature or scenic trees. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: The site will drain directly into an existing 36 inch storm drain located in Town Center Drive which drains to Deer Creek Channel. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) 41,472 gallons per day b. CommemiaVlnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gaUmiNac) 4082 gallons per tenant per day 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ^x Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewagegeneration.~ (SeeAttachmentAforusageestimates). For furthercladfication,p/easecontactthe Cucamonga Valley Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gaUday) 30,780 gallons per day b. Commercial/industrial (gal/day/ac) 5,491 gallons per day RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 162 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or forsa/e units): 162 attached condominium for sale units. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part7.docPage 5 of 10 Rev. 3/17/64 P490 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: To be Sale Price(s) $ determined to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: To be determined 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: The proposed project will be an age restricted residential development with an anticipated two persons per household per unit. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: The proposed project is an age restricted retirement b. Junior High: community and school age children are not permitted to reside within the project. c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 28) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: A major anchor store such as a grocery store is anticipated on one parcel and smaller in-line tenants will be sought for amulti-tenant building located on the second parcel. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industnal, or institutional uses by type: 26,884 square feet of retail commercial and service commercial use. 27) Indicate hours of operation: Normal hours of operation, no "afer hours" operation proposed. 28) Number of employees: - Total: To be determined after tenants are identified. Maximum Shin: Time of Maximum Shift: I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Pan1.docPage 6 of 10 Rev. 3/17104 P491 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and sa/aryranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): To be identified after identification of tenants. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industna/ uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management DisMct, at (818) 572-6283): The primary source and amount of air pollution emissions will be from automobile traffic to and from the residential development and commercial center. Overall amounts of emissions generated from the residential component of the proposed development project are anticipated to be reduced due to the proximity of commercial retail uses and commercial services located within walkine distance to the residences. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the projectbeen contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Water, sewer, fire and control agencies serving the project will be contacted as part of the Ciry's review of the tentative parcel map and tentative trot[ map applications and will provide comments regarding their respective areas of jurisdiction to provide service to the project. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storageofanyoftheabove. Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. There has been no historical use of the vacant portion of the project site for storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. The operations of the existing automobile service station located within the boundaries of the project site include the storage and handling of fuels, oils, and solvenu in a manner consistent with the conditions of approval adopted by the Ciry as part of the conditional approval of the service station. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inilial Study Partl.doePage 7 of 10 Rev. 3117/04 P492 34) loll the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/ortoxic matehals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location o(such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. I}te proposed project includes the continued operation of the existing automobile service station located within the project site. Service station operations are regulated by the conditions of approval adopted by the City as part of its conditional approval of the service station. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation o(thisproject to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie( l /urther understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: April 25, 2008 Signature: Title: ~iI`~~i Debby Linn Linn & Associates I:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Stutly Panl.docPage 8 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 P493 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usaoe Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gallday/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 galldaylunit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gallday/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitial Study Partl.docPage 9 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 P494 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 10 of 10 Rev. 3117/04 P495 General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment Project Summary Project Overview Lewis Community Developers is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Community Plan Amendment for the proposed Fountain Glen residential and Haven Square commercial development project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga."Ihe General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment are submitted by Lewis Community Developers for an approximately 14.72 gross acre site located within the Terra Vista Community Plan azea at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street as illustrated in Exhibit 1, "General Plan Amendment Map." 'Ihe GPA is a request to amend the General Plan land use map changing the General Plan land use designation for the site from Office to Residential Medium High Density and Neighborhood Commercial. 'Ihe Community Plan Amendment application is a request to amend the Terra Vista Community Plan land use map changing the planning district designation for the site from Office Park (OP) to Residential Medium High Density (MH) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and to delete the designation of a bus stop at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street. "Ihe Existing General Plan land use designation and Zoning/Community Plan designations for the project site are illustrated on Exhibit 2, "Existing General Plan and Zoning/Community Plan Designation." 'Ihe pro- posed General Plan land use designation and Zoning/Community Plan designation for the project site aze illustrated on Exhibit 3, "Proposed General Plan Land Use and Community Plan Designation." 'Ihe Fountain Glen project is a proposal for development of approximately 11.83 acres of the project site as an age re- stricted condominium community within a pazk like setting providing active recreational amenities for residents and lo- cated within walking distance to a new retail and service commercial center of approximately 2.89 acres. 'Ihe Fountain Glen community will address the mazket needs of active residents with provision of active recreational facilities and an on-site pedestrian and bicycle circulation system connecting residences to recreational facilities and planned new com- mercial services. Residents will be able to walls or bike to a centrally located multi-purpose community building, bar- beque and picnic azea facilities, gardens for informal gatherings, a bocce ball court, and a putting green. Exclusive pe- destrian and bicycle access will be provided between the commercial center and residences offering opportunities for residents to walk or bike to shopping and services. LAND USE SUMMARY APPROXIMATE AREA Commercial Center 2.89 acres Residential Area 11.83 acres Total 14.72 acres Residential Summary Total Dwelling Units 162 Residential Density 13.69 du/acre r~e5:~1n~~T P496 Residential Uses Residential uses are planned on approximately 11.83 acres of the project site. Development of up to 162 residential condominium units at a density of 13.69 dwelling units per acre is proposed. Residential units will be for sale condo- miniums to meet the needs of active adults within an age-restricted community. A mix of one bedroom, two bedroom, and dual master bedroom residential condominium units are planned ranging in size from approximately 982 square feet to 1,550 square feet with an average unit size of 1,290 square feet. Amenities Recreational and open space amenities are planned for Fountain Glen within walking distance to all residences. Recreational and open space amenities planned for development as part of the residential component of Fountain Glen include: • AMulti-purpose community facility • Large open lawn aeeas and gazden areas for informal gatherings • Barbeque and picnic for group gatherings • A putting green • A bocce ball court Commercial Uses The Haven Square commercial center of approximately 26,884 square feet on approximately 2.89 acres is planned con- currently with the Fountain Glen project. Haven Squaze will provide a site for a major anchor tenant, such as a grocery store, and a site for amulti-tenant building containing smaller specialty shops and personal service businesses. The location of Haven Square immediately adjacent to the Fountain Glen residential use offers opportunities for resi- dents to walk or bike to shopping and services. Safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access points will be pro- vided along the boundary between Haven Square and Fountain Glen to encourage walking and biking within the community. Surrounding Land Use Fountain Glen and Haven Square aze bounded by the following land uses. North: Existing medium density residential use. South: Existing community commercial uses. East: Existing office park uses. West: Existing commercial and residential uses. a N.~~:; per... ~ - ~ .June1D08 ..:2 - P497 Land Use Compatibility Approval by the City of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment will lead to de- velopment of a project that is compatible with surrounding existing and planned land uses. The pattern of land uses within the area of the project site includes existing medium density residential development, existing commercial office development, and existing commercial land uses. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment include a request to change the land use designation of approximately 2.89 acres within the project site from Office Park to Neighborhood Commercial. This 2.89 acre portion of the project site is located north of and adjacent to existing commercial land uses. The Terra Vista Community Plan describes the intent for Neighborhood Commercial areas as providing sites for markets, drug stores, Laundromats, dry cleaners, and other neighborhood shops and services. Locations of neighborhood commercial cen- ters should be easily accessible by automobile from all parts ofTerra Vista via the loop parkway, while offering exposure to residents in adjoining communities. Neighborhood commercial centers should be located neaz the extensions of the greenway system for easy access on foot and by bicycle. The location of the proposed neighborhood commercial center offers easy vehicular and bicycle access from Town Center Drive. D'uect pedestrian access is provided to the proposed neighborhood center for residents of Fountain Glen, and pedestrian and bicycle access to the neighborhood center is available to surrounding residents from the greenway system located in Terra Vista Parkway neaz the neighborhood center and from the pedestrian walkway in Town Center Drive. Uses envisioned for development within the planned 2.89 acre commercial center include a gro- cerystore and specialty stores offering goods and services to the planned Fountain Glen residential community, the sur- rounding existing residential community, and the existing and planned office park complexes within proximity to the project site. Approval by the City of the request to change the General Plan and Community Plan land use designa- tion for this area to Neighborhood Commercial will meet the intent of the Neighborhood Commercial land use des- ignation and maintain land use compatibility with the existing and planned pattern of land use within Terra Vista and the surrounding area. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment includes a request to change the land use designation of approximately 11.83 acres within the project site from Office Park to Residential Medium High Density. This 11.83 acre portion of the project site is located south of and adjacent to an existing residential medium density de- velopment located north of Church Street and southwest of an existing single family residential development located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue. The Terra Vista Community Plan describes the Residential Medium High Density land use category as including single family detached and attached home types, townhomes, gazden apartments, and condominiums at a density range of 14-24 dwelling units per acre. The location of the 11.83 acre portion of the project site adjacent to Haven Avenue at the periphery of the Terra Vista community and adjacent to existing medium density residential development located north of Church Street estab- lishes the site as a suitable location for Residential Medium High Density development in accordance with the cri- teria of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Approval by the City to change the land use designation for this area to a Residential Medium High Density land use designation would permit development of a residential condominium project of approximately 13.69 dwelling units per acre consistent with the density level established for the existing resi- dential area located north of Church Street. Designating this area for Residential Medium High Density development will maintain land use compatibility and consistency within the immediate vicinity of the project site and will maintain a compatible pattern of land use within the Terra Vista community and the surrounding area. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment include a request for approval to delete the designation of a bus stop at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. Omni Trans, the local public transit service provider, has indicated that a bus stop in this location is not needed. a.. k~~~-. -- - - - ~ - 9une3008 3 P498 I ~i/I I I I ,~ I i-+-+'-IT-{-J I I I A I I I I I ,~„/a~ \ I `1-L-I-iy1~`° ~- -7- /~ .J ; L~_~_n_J_1_J ~~/~ ii / ili OFFlfE _~ I ii i i / i n CQVtlEXCUL ii MU1~7f~AN/LY i ~l -I -T-,-_-_--T.-~ I / I I I i/ ann'.~ I / ~OF7C PLAN // ~ / / ~ I //(`n ~~ \\~ / // / / ly / r-J ___~ j / ~ ~ / `\ / CO.I~fMt~AL~ 60 / /~ (OC) % ~ \\ ~-- ~ ~ ~--- ' ~ I I! \~~ I I $ L\<~ ~'~ -- /~ h \ I / "Y ~ /,/J' / ~ I XdATAGK:., I STATION \\\ ~~ ~I .t r 1 a ~SCAtE~ rEE ~r are it'anuar, woe ---I / I~ - ~~-_,- Exhibit 1 General Plan Amendment Map _ I /~, , ~ ~ ~ / 1 •` ~` \~ ~ goo 1 1 , . ~. % . ~ ; ,. ammo N1GH OQ67TY 1 T ~ ~ ~ \ RE90ENDAL I rMW ~ / /f,` ` ~ \ ~ \\ j ' r /:~ \\ ~ r ~ i / ~ / ~ ~ / ~ \ ~~ ' .r ~ PARK ~ ~ / ~ .~ I` \ ~ / ~ / I / // ~ ~ / _ .~ ;'~.~~..~\ 1 \ \~\` h~ `'\; cavuuNm ~~ ~, c»au+mau \\ (~J .~, r ~ a~ / ~~~ // / ----J ~. /~ ~~ ; r / ~ ,/ ,; tom- wciNm,uaP Nor ro score P499 ~r Ltf :> FOOTHILL BLV I~- Source: Terra Viaa Community Plan Exhibit 2 Existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning/ Community Plan Designation P500 !~1 ~ Foorwo~~ eLV ~r-- Souree: Tma Virta Community Plan Exhibit 3 Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning/Community Plan Designation --~~~ - ~~.,June200B-. .-6 P501 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18608, Development Review DRC2008-00162, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-Ot, 46, and 93. Related Files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staft has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community -APN: 1077-422-Ot, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. P502 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 2 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Luis Gomez, Director of Retail Project Development Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Avenue PO Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 5. General Plan Designation: Office Space 6. Zoning: Office Park (OPK) -Terra Vista Community Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at the south west corner of Haven and Church and is characterized by Multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter and perimeter landscaping since that time. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G URBEMIS2007 -Urban Emissions Model 2007 P5O3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality ()Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By Reviewed By: ~ ~~ ~~~ Date: 2 ~ Date: 't ~ P504 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 4 Less Then Siprvlicant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: vplanranr Sipnilicanf wim Mllipation Than SigNticam No Impact Incompretetl Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? P5O5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Prnenranr Significant wnn Mitipavon rnan Significant No Im act Inco oratetl I ecf Im acf Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven and Church- and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was grade as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Ptan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was grade as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. The nearest active agricultural use is more than 2.34 miles north east from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? P506 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 6 less Than $igru(,wnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po+enaally wan IDan $ignilicant Mitigalion $ignilwnt No Irtbect Inco,aorztetl Irtpact Imoan Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. According to the Air Quality Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, dated February 2008, "The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, which is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and SCAQMD AQMP. In addition, the proposed project will not exceed the SCAQMD's long-term growth projections and emission thresholds. Therefore, implementation of the project will not conflict with the AQMP, and no significant impacts will result." See page 21 of the above referenced study for the technical analysis of the ARB model Urban Emissions Model 2007 (URBEMIS2007) which used the higher emissions for each criteria pollutant during summer or winter and assumes all stationary source emissions are from mixed-uses. As shown, the project would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily emission thresholds in the year analyzed, and therefore, the projects impact is less-than-significant and no mitigation measures are required. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the SCAQMD on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low-pressure spray. P507 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 7 Less Than Significam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Po+antlany Significant wan Mitigation Tnan Sipnificam No Irmact IncorpoateE Irtgact I ecl 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxide (Nox), Reactive Organize Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide. increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 P5O8 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fpfanuallr Signllicanl With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incomormetl Impact Irroatl of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis- to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. According to the Air Quality Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, dated February 2008, "The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, which is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and SCAQMD AQMP. In addition, the proposed project will not exceed the SCAQMD's long-term growth projections and emission thresholds. Therefore, implementation of the project will not conflict with the AQMP, and no significant impacts will result." d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. P509 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 9 Less Then $BOIIiLdN La55 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Polenuany $ipnilicam wish Mnipation roan $ignilicam Np Impact Inca oratetl Inpacl Impact e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since [hat time. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. P510 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 10 Less Than SiOnilicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ?otan,iany wnn man $iBnilicanl Mitigation SiBnilicant No Irtnatl Inca oratatl Im act Impact c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have nc impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. P511 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 11 Less Tnan Sipnilicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 'ote"`la'lY Sipniliwm Wilp Mitipallon Tnan Sipnifcam No Irtpen Incomomtetl Impact Impact • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resources (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • .Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner P512 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 12 Less Tnan Sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g PotenOany sipNlicant wun Mitigation man sipnifcant No Impact Incomoratetl Impan Imoan- has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as O O O (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red HiII Fault, passes within .79 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.65 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes, is 10.4 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 13.3 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during P513 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 13 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pp~enuanr Significant With Mhipation Then $ignilicam No Impact Into ratetl Impact Irtroecf September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,tl emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of TvB Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically Loamy Sand. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? P514 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 14 Lass roan Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pmantiany wan roan pp g Significant Mlfigafion Significant No Im act Inco oratetl I act Imoan d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed commercial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each business license for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within .16 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not P515 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fmenrany with man Significant Mitigation Significant No Inbad Inco oretetl Im azt Impact reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) P516 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 16 Less Tnen Slpnilicent Lass Issues and Supportin Information Sources: P^+enrauy wun roan g Significam Mitigation Sipnilicam No I act Inca orated Imoac+ Im act g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) .Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over t acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Construction Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Pertorm inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention P517 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 17 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poteociany Slgnilicant wnn Mitigation Tnen Significant No I acf Inco oratetl I aQ Imoaq basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) See other specific BMPs from the WOMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, on-file in the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. P518 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 18 Lea: Tnan Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wnn Mitigation than Significant Np 0Ct OCOIppfB~Btl act fIYIeCt b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. P519 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 19 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pete"'ial'Y Sipnillcam wnn Miripanon Than Significant Na' I ad Incomoratetl Im ad Imoetl 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, and commercial retail development to the south. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. P520 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 20 Less Then Signilicant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmemially Sipnificem wnh Mitigauon Than Significant No Impact Incorporatetl Impart IrrgeR b) The project site land use designation is currently Office. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as proposed to be amended and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? P521 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 21 Less Tpan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 'pta",.ally SiBnlticant wim Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoan Impact Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. A Noise Study was prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008, and the following Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less•than-significant levels: Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting of walls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2006. Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met.. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building and Safety Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p. m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer P522 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 22 Lass man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pp,amlally Significant wan Mitigation roan Sipnificam No Irtped Incpmoratetl Irtnad Impact shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located growth. Construction employees to the area. employees; hence, will employees will likely be are anticipated. in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) P523 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 23 Less Than . Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 'gtancaoy Significant wnn Mitigation Than Significant No I act Incomoratatl Im ect Im act Comments: a) The site, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1.19 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) Central School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located .27 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase the demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? P524 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 24 Less Tnan Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potanuany Significant wnn Mitivetion ,non Sipnilicent No I am nco oretetl Im atl ImOac[ Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located .27 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 1,705 new vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 162 age-restricted apartments and two retail buildings of approximately 26,884 square feet. The Traffic Study by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2008, estimates that the project will generate 40 trips during a.m. peak hour and 84 trips during p.m. hour for a net of 1,705 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. P525 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 25 Leu Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Fetenually sigmroant wun Miugadun man sgmncam Ne Imoad Inwmorated I atl Irtgact b) The Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2008, estimates that the project will generate 40 trips during a.m. peak hour and 64 trips during p.m. hour for a net of 1,705 trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permits. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project already has street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along all the street frontages of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? P526 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 26 Less Than Sipniliwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pc~enuallr $ipnilicant wpm Mitigation Than Sigrvlican~ No I ect Incp mtetl Impact Irtroacl e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) ee served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP•4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVW D water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the .Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. P527 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 27 Less Tnan $iBoi~ICant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppteprany $igniticant wim Mitigation man Significant No Impact Inco p,atetl ImpaG Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as amended. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with P528 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 28 Less man Sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fmenrany sipnilicant wnn Mitipatlon rnan SipnilicaN No Impact Incorporeled Irtoact Impact the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1969 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCR #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) (x) Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated June 23, 2008, by Madole & Associates, Inc. (x) Traffic Study- Mobile Marriott Mixed Use, LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 12, 2008. (x) Air Quality Analysis -Terra Vista Fountain Glen, by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008. (x) Noise Impact Analysis -Terra Vista Fountain Glen, by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008. P529 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occurG~ [~ Applicant's Signature: 7~ / Date: ! ~~ ~ b Print Name and Title: D f ~QG'~OKK, o~ Pro lec{` Live to~Fna~.-~-- L~,c.~~ ~, . C-~rn~-~ P530 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, AND DRC2008-00163 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared incompliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P531 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161 /SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS August 28, 2008 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicantto post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160. Terra Vista Communitv Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map 18797, and Conditional Use Permit And Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163 Applicant: Lewis Communitv Developers Initial Study Prepared by: Larry Henderson AICP Date: August 28. 2008 ... -. -. .. ' /Alr Quality': .. r e ~. ~. r ~ r 4 ~,I+ev; ~~n " rp ~' ~fx4' 4'~ tw ~: ie~`~+s~' r 3"`~y rr,y~r~q n~.§s~t " y : ~ ~ b J All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissioris. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Cily verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: 1 of 9 v_°, w N .. ... -. - .. - Re-establish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 2of9 can w w - .. ... .. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. ,; .- , Culttl~af.fiesources ` .: ' . „ ~ T ~ ~ ~'~ , ~ . ' - i~ t ~ . , ;, , i < _. ._.:, __._ ~ ~ ~.._.. , a~ .. ._ :.. , ., If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. 3of9 can w a -. .. • Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resources (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 4of9 c~» w .. - ... -. -. .. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. GeologyshdSoils:.' _` ,: r The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~oemissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 5 of 9 ~ w rn ... -. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 the WOMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 7 of 9 w V - ... .. Noise .: ,, ~~ '~:.~£ ':. ~ ~ ~''~ ~ `~s ~~., Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting of walls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by SSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2008. Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including.Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Cade Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building and Safety Oiticial. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early PD C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction 8of9 can w a .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Respohsible Person s `' ``' ~ ~ 'Mondo'riiig Frequency -Method of Uerrficatron'~ ~ y~~~r~`~ ~', a ~r~ ;Sanchons+' . ~'~ 4 r, ' ~; ~' CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD -Planning Director or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Cily Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Ceniticate of Occupancy BO -Building Olticial or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9of9 vim, w cD P540 RESOLUTION NO. 08-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93 A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Builders filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staffreports, togetherwith publictestimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is multi-family residential. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an offce park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. EXHIBIT B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-54 DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS April 24, 2008 Page 2 P541 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, since the submitted Master Plan (Conceptual layout) demonstrates a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate multi-family residential and commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection, and provides vehicle and pedestrian access that is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; The Master Plan (Conceptual layout) utilizes access points existing on Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive forthe Neighborhood Commercial land use and, primarily, Terra Vista Parkway for the residential use thereby directing traffic to non-residential oriented streets and; c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as; "The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include: eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be provided." The General Plan describes Medium-High Residential as;'The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested Amendments is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive; 4. The information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project. will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these fndings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OB-54 DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS April 24, 2008 Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 to change the General Plan Land Use Plan designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 Acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and including a Master Plan designation requirement which is included for reference purposes, as shown in Exhibit "B". 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: <~'Za~~~ V~ Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: l~ ~ ~" "~ Ja s R. Troyer, AICP, Secret I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY P542 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE LOW ~_____~~ m CHURCH EDI ~ i MEDIUM HIGH MIXED USE MEDIUM HIGH 1424 DUTAC (Master Plan Required) INDUSTRIAL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD D COMMERCIAL Z GENERAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL COML. COMA 300 0 300 600 Feet ~~ EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 (Amending the Land Use Plan) P544 f! "~-~----~ 'I 1~~ ~... w ~ ~ .. ~~z ~~,~,~ ~~ tS fey-Fvi ~~. ~ :, o ~'-'1, Y1 ~ ~^ VU S w o?J ; i ~i~P~ . Z :H g1i"~'' g '° ~ ~ W y :. P545 RESOLUTION NO. OS-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS REQUESTING TO AMEND THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE PLAN (FIGURE III-17) FROM OF 14.73 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-Ot, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Developers filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjectTerra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 24, 2008 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publid hearing on the application DRC2008-00161 and issued Resolution No. 08-45, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith publictestimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 14.73 acres of undeveloped land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The propertyto the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is multi-family residential. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and Commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and EXHIBIT C P546 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.08-46 DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) thatthe Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. P547 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-46 DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 as shown in the attached City Council draft ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: (, r L- Jame .Troyer, AICP, Secreta I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Commissioner Stewart noted that she was present for their review at DRC and that were concerns regarding architecture, the driveways and layout of driveways bu they were addressed. She favored limiting the number (9) houses that offered the a nal room overthe garage (Plan 3X). She said it will be a nice project. Vice Chairman Munoz commented that the developer w orthcoming and speedy addressing concerns of the DRC, and they accommodated then ' ors to the north. He said he appreciated their efforts. Chairman Fletcher commented that h ors the development of 13 single story homes. He said this fits the City's needs. Motion: Moved by M ,seconded by Howdyshell, to adopt the resolution approving DRC2008- 00143 with the add condition as noted by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FL HER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: NE NONE -carried ..... B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160- LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Offce to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/acre).and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial-APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEV ELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163.. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 18797 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS -A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2D08-00161, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 24, 2008 P548 EXHIBIT D P549 Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC-Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. APN:l077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit/Development Review DRC2008-00163, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, noted that a copy of the Design Review Committee (DRC) Action agenda for the August 19, 2008 meeting had been placed before the Commissioners as an added exhibit for the discussion of the project. He remarked the issues noted by the DRC have been addressed and that the applicant will need to complete the process and receive approval from the Council for an ABC license for the Fresh & Easy Store. He asserted that the General Plan Amendment and Terra Vista Amendment will have to go to the Council for final approval and the approvals of the other items are contingent upon that approval. Commissioner Stewart asked how the ABC handles over-concentrations of licenses within this census area and where are the businesses that already have ABC licenses or are competing for this. Mr. Henderson responded that the ABC license req uest is not part of this application, however, it is not unusual to have over-concentrations in some areas, and that some areas are huge and others are small and they assess the density/population of the area and also can adjust their boundaries. He added that this part of the analysis has not been done yet. Chairman Fletcher commented that the residential portion of this application originally came forward as an age restricted senior apartment project but that it is not conditioned as such. He asked if a zone change would specifically restrict it to senior apartments. Mr. Henderson reported that the intent is to provide for senior apartments through the master plan. He noted that if they want to change the master plan, they would have to convince the Commission as to why it would be a good idea to change that. He noted that if the Commission is not comfortable with approving the residential portion, the Commission has the option of only approving the commercial and review the General Plan Amendment and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment applications at a later time. He remarked that there is not a guarantee without a development agreement in place. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, remarked that staff is correct, that the application approvals could be parceled out and the commercial CUP could be approved alone. Vice Chairman Munoz remarked that they did have apre-application review for the proposed land use. Mr. Flower commented that nothing within the master plan is changing with these applications. He said if they wanted to do something other than restricted senior housing, they would have to come back to do that. Luis Gomez, Project Manager for Lewis Community Developers, thanked staff and the Design Review Committee (DRC). He commented on the project architecture, enhanced pedestrian connections, landscaping, drought tolerant plant palette, state of the art irrigation, low impact/best practices for stormwater and water management, and the enhanced frontage for Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. He noted the other members of his team were also present and available for questions. He commented that the project incorporates the needs of the community. He said the conditions of approval are acceptable with the exception of one. He said the Fresh & Easy store Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 24, 2008 P550 would like to operate 24 hours per day. He referred to condition D7, a and b, found on page B,C,D,E,F -154 of the agenda packet. Mr. Henderson reported that it is a standard condition imposed because the project proposed could be adjacent to residential development and the units would be about 120 feet away from the loading area. He noted that no information was received that indicated they needed more hours than that in the PCN application. He said it is the Commission's call and they could approve the change now and revisit it later if it becomes a problem in the future. Chairman Fletcher noted the transition from commercial to residential development and that it is a standard condition. He said he would be concerned, especially if they intend to build senior apartments there. Commissioner Howdyshell agreed and said they are market rate, people are purchasing and that homeowners purchase the right to quiet and it could be a sales deterrent. Mr. Gomez said they are open to the possibility of allowing the extended hours for a specified time and come back for review if there are any problems or complaints with the neighboring residents. Vice Chairman Munoz expressed concern that we have even had problems with noise from a construction site, and with this project, the loading dock is adjacent to the proposed apartments. He suggested caution, seniors are involved, ever present in the community and they vote. He said they may even come to a meeting before the Commission and ask us how we could possibly allow loading and unloading in the wee hours of the morning. Commissioner Howdyshell noted it could affect sales of the units. Commissioner Wimberly agreed that the noise factor could affect sales. He asked for clarification if the request is for store operation hours to be 24 hours or if it is just for unloading/loading. He noted that is a significant difference of what the conditions provide for. Andy Call, representing Fresh & Easy, said their request is for 24-hour operations and loading and unloading but typical hours of operation are from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. He said they prefer the full flexibility of hours and then adjust to their customers accordingly. He said the conditions require they work with local police and have security cameras. He said the request is so they can receive fresh produce and stock the shelves prior to opening. He added there is 120- foot separation with a CMU wall separating them from the proposed apartments. He said they have hybrid refrigerated trucks with quieter roll up doors and they have azero-noise, and no-idling policy. He said the trucks shut off and the refrigeration is then powered via aplug-in from the store building. He asked forthe removal of the condition. Chairman Fletcher asked of normal delivery hours. He commented that loading and unloading is allowed between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Mr. Henderson corrected his interpretation of the condition and clarified that they are restricted from those activities from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Mr. Call said the stores are typically open 7-11 but they would like more hours for delivery. Mr. Henderson remarked that if it remains at 7:00 a.m., it saves staff from having to do noise monitoring. Chairman Fletcher noted it is just an hour difference from the condition. He then asked the applicants if they would like it open 24 hours and then determine the needs for the area. Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 24, 2008 P551 Mr. Call said they would like more flexibility, they would like to keep it open 24 hours Commissioner Stewart remarked that she heard "they like to keep it open 24 hours" but she also heard "7-11." She asked for clarification. Mr. Call clarified that they are typically open (for business) 7-11 but they do not want to be conditioned restricting them from being open 24 hours, that they would like to start with that and then adjust to their customers needs. Commissioner Howdyshell confrmed that they are asking for absolute flexibility. Garth Chambers, Project Managerforthe residential portion ofthe project (Lewis Companies) said they are contracted with Fountain Glen and said they have submitted their application forthe senior apartments and that they are in the process of addressing their incompleteness comments. He said the environmental documents are all written with the residential development of senior housing in mind. He requested that their application move forward. Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Munoz said he could not support the extension of loading and unloading for 24 hours of operation. He said there is no evidence this needs to happen. Commissioner Howdyshell said she likes the composition of the project; the neighborhood commercial use with the residential use and is a mis-marked need in our community for a long time. She said this is needed along the north/south artery. She reported that she toured the Fountain Glen project and she really likes it. She said she hopes this project will be as good or better than that one. She noted her struggle with the requestfor the added hours and absolute flexibility with it that close to the proposed residential development. Commissioner Wimberly said he is not comfortable with 24-hour operation for the loading and off loading request. He said it would increase the noise levels probably more than anticipated. He said the project is very good. He reported that the applicant worked with the DRC and the City on colors and signage. He said the residential portion is needed development and he looks forward to seeing their new plans. Commissioner Stewart said it is a good project and a good fit for the area, that we need age restricted, market rate housing product. She noted we have an aging population. She said she welcomes Fresh & Easy and that it will be convenient for people to shop there everyday. She said she disagrees with her fellow Commissioners regarding the request for extended hours. She said she is a little concerned about the loading but she would support 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. for open store hours. She said with their specialized trucks, they could include in the conditions a restriction on idling and loitering, and no stacking, and she would give it the opportunity to see if they can be compatible with the residential neighborhood. She said there cannot be a big expectation for a quiet zone in that area. She said it could be brought back to the Commission for modification of the Conditional Use Permit if it became a problem. Chairman Fletcher said it is a good project. He said he is usually hesitant to give up office/commercial land uses to residential but senior housing is in demand in our aging community and this is a well designed project that provides a good transition that will be a compliment to the apartments. He said Fresh 8 Easy is a new concept, a great location for them, and he welcomed them. He offered support in concert with Commissioner Stewart to change the hours and adjust it by one hour. He said it is important for businesses to try to live within the conditions of the town but if there are other locations for this business (Fresh & Easy) that have those hours then he said he would make a concession and support the one hour change to 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 24, 2008 Vice Chairman Munoz said it is a great project and he appreciated the details worked out with the DRC. He said they stepped up to the plate with enhancements. He concurred that a one hour extension/change is doable but would not support a request beyond that and if that makes it normal for the business then that would be ok. He moved approval of the project and that the condition on page 154 of the agenda packet be changed to add one hour (7:00 a.m. to 11:D0 p.m.) Mr. Flower asked if the Commission was going to change 7b or just 7a of the conditions because they both reference hours of operation. Chairman Fletcher said they should match and called for a motion. Mr. Flower confirmed the hours should match in #7a, b and #8 on page 154. Commissioner Stewart asked to reopen the floorfor comment and then asked if deliveries beginning at 5:00 a.m. would be helpful. Mr. Call said it would be extremely helpful to have those two extra hours in the morning. Commissioner Stewart moved that condition 7b reflect 5:00 a.m. for deliveries. Chairman Fletcher said he would prefer the first motion made and that by doing that, they would see if it becomes a problem and then the business could be brought back in. Mr. Flower confirmed that the motion is for loading and unloading and that their normal hours of operation are from 7;D0 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and a substitute motion for 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and neither has received a second. He confirmed that operational hours include the stocking of shelves prior to opening the store. Mr. Call said their stores are typically open from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., deliveries and stocking occur 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.; the store would not be open 5:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. Mr. Flower asked how staff is interpreting the condition. Mr. Henderson responded as broadly as possible because that is how we would monitor the condition if it became a problem. Chairman Fletcher said he preferred the original motion and he asked if there is a second to that motioh. James Troyer, Planning Director noted that there are competing motions on the floor with no seconds. He said Vice Chairman Munoz' motion is for the hours to begin at 7:00 a.m. and Commissioner Stewart's motion is to begin hours at 5:00 a.m. and if neither is seconded, then they both die for a lack of a second. Commissioner Wimberly gave his second to hours beginning at 5:00 a.m. (restrictions from 11:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Vice Chairman Munoz asked if the project could go down based upon the dispute over the hours Mr. Flower said that it could if all the applications are considered together, but if the CUP is separated out from the rest then it could be handled separately. P552 Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 24, 2008 P553 Vice Chairman Munoz responded that with that in mind he would then support separating out the project approvals because he cannot support the suggestion of more than the one hour change request (as stated in his own motion). Commissioner Stewart replied that she does not wish the project to go down but that they should give the store the chance. She said she would be willing to withdraw her motion and that she is not suggesting they be open 24 hours. She said she does not want to see it killed because of hours. She said they are giving them some leniency to see what will work and it would probably come back anyway at a later time. She said they should give them a chance, residential is not there yet, and let them try to comply and if it does not work, the Commission can bring it back....one time event. She said she believes this situation can tolerate this change. Chairman Fletcher said it is a new project, these are standard conditions that are set for the City and if they change them for every project they will not have standard conditions anymore. He said they are asking the Commission for a change but these standard conditions are in place for a reason. He said if there was no second to Commissioner Munoz' motion, then he would second it. Commissioner Stewart withdrew her motion but she said she believes they (standard conditions) should be looked at on a case by case basis. Mr. Troyer said Commissioner Munoz' motion remains in place with the request for a second. Commissioner Wimberly seconded Vice Chairman Munoz' motion. Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan amendment DRC20O8-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan amendment DRC2006-00161 to be forv/arded to the City Council for final action with a request to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Additionally, the Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 and Conditional Use Permit and Design Review DRC2008-00163 with the change in hours (condition 7 a & b, and 8 of the standard conditions, Section D -Shopping Centers) to reflect the hours of operation (including deliveries and store hours) from 7:00 a.m. -11:00 p.m. as amended. The Commission approved Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 by minute action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -carried k t • ,F R G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC20 04 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of a~ ser-planned recreational vehicle and self storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the ri Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 interchange - APN: 0226-011-38. Relate .- es: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Ame eht DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of env' .- ental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1'IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 - CHARLES J H ASSOCIATES - A requestto amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of per 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specifc Plan to add recreational vehicle and self stor acilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files ditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008- 00204. has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 24, 2008 P554 RESOLUTION NO. OS-Z Z n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93 A. Recitals 1. Lewis Community Builders filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2008-00160 and issued Resolution 08-38 recommending City Council approve the above listed application. 3. On November 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and ismulti-family residential; the properly to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and commercial; the property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park; and the property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and P555 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. "*-" DRC2008-00160 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS November 5, 2008 Page 2 e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, since the submitted Master Plan (Conceptual layout) demonstrates a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate multi-family residential and commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection, and provides vehicle and pedestrian access that is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system; and b. That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties. The Master Plan (Conceptual layout) utilizes access points, existing on Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive for the Neighborhood Commercial land use and, primarily, Terra Vista Parkway for the residential use thereby directing traffic to non-residential oriented streets and; c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as: "The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with the adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be provided." The General Plan describes Medium-High Residential as "The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested Amendment is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive; 4. The information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment: The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the P556 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. "-"` DRC2008-00160 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS November 5, 2008 Page 3 independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council 's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 to change the General Plan Land Use Plan designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 Acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A",and including a Master Plan designation requirement which is included for reference purposes, as shown in Exhibit "B". The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. --~~) LOW m CHURCH EDI MIXED USE MEDIUM HIGH 1424 OWAC MEDIUM HIGH INDUSTRIAL PARK j NEIGHBORHOOD D COMMERCIAL Z GENERAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL OFFICE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 300 0 300 600 Feet ~~ EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 (Amending the Land Use Plan) (Master Plan Required) P559 ORDINANCE NO. S ~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161, A REQUEST TO AMEND LAND USE PLAN (FIGURE III-17) DESIGNATION OF 14.73 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-46, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment. 2. On November 5, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 5, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 3: The Terra Vista Community Plan, is hereby amended to change the Land Use Plan (Figure III-17) designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Planned Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, including a Master Plan requirement designation, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A". P560 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS November 5, 2008 Page 2 SECTION 4: Terra Vista Planned Community Land Use Plan (Figure III-17), is hereby amended to include a Conceptual Master Plan, as shown in Exhibit "B". SECTION 5: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. a. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission therefore is forwarding the proposed Negative Declaration to the City Council for their final consideration as the adoption will reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on their initial findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration by the City Council. b. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures' during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, 'or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P561 \~' M z L M CHURCH MH F ~ 2 ~ < ~e MU z MH IP ~ NC ~p GC CC / 200 0 200 400 Feet EXHIBIT "A" TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 (Amending Figure III-7 Land Use Plan) P562 LOW m CHURCI-~ EDI / MIXED USE MEDIUM HIGH 1424 DU/AC (Master Plan Required) INDUSTRIAL PARK Ov ~ ~ O~ G 00 O ~v NEIGHBORHOOD = COMMERCIAL ~ / ~ m Z GENERAL r OFFICE COMMERCIAL COMh COMh 300 0 300 600 Feet MEDIUM HIGH. EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 (Amending the Land Use Plan) r~.. ~~ .---~~ c ar E a m 0 0 0 d c J C 0 8 ~~.~~~~i~~~gila~ §~ ~ Y ~~E €E g b~ ~~ ~` a E f9 5 J g ~~: F~ YU X85 ~ g~a b, $a ~~~ ~5 Y qq i= ~ ~ _~e ~L ~ ~ r ye 3~ s ~ gfi~ a~ ~y ~`e Y € ~ 2~ a ~. @33`eg ~e $ '~ 5 Y 2 pE k9? ~a ~ S ~F~B gege ~~ ~~y §a °es g zg~S F€ ng ~~~ A g 2§p[ E F s~ Y~ F ~ = CiY1~£9£ [~~ a~ ~FP p$pyp c ~z' gg~gE tlyu g ~8 gF2 ~ `02 ~ 5~e~ QR €~ tF 2KFe § ~9 app~ 8~~g °~~ 'e~ ~u92 °£~ s ~~ 7Y Eig S~S e~ ~ ~~° '" ~ VS~~ `5 1~ F E 1 ~ ~~ g~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~$ ~~~ ~: o ~i ~ O as _ '> V N . _ ~ o y n c n ~ c ~ > ~ _ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' N Q V J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' C C ~ - - I- 9 f 3 C ni • i i• i L E Q ~ ¢~ €s E u ~e ~ ~ yyI e v { ° r F ~ r `. g i W Ig R +~' " Y a' y 8 'x •• t ~' s W = g E ~ g'~ E F a2 i 9 ' O g ~~ _ •~ i E °u i E V Z n c C1 • ~e E ae. : np• ~ [ Y e G Yj ~ F: e ~ $n 8 5• n ~ -d 3 ¢ 8 °8 - i B CV ~n E ge p yE~ p u yT F• o i s •~ p -'~ • i '-V 4y 8R _ g`s z a n ~ 2p g ~° x ~^ fie k S z € 9of 3 a 5:~, d5 ~i E: a 3 1 ~F ~ g3° :F8 3° - SY8 = 3e F fi s €~ Ue `R ~ U s'F 'm ~'g~ ~F :gs aF ~ ~~ g 8 $ ~ N S 5fr ° 3 zz 3z E;- ~: tea' ~: Fu 'i W d 3 ~ 7 r i s d # ~! '? ~ N N 2 N N N L V ~ N . ~ ~ ~. ' ~ N ~ L 0 C C Q V .~ ,,. ~1, ,? ,~ 9 .. ~J OO ~ ~, ~ '~ -~: I,®. ~^ CI ~ ~ N C a ~ a~+ H .~ N O :+ V O t Q J (.~ u ~ d~''~'a ~~~~~~ a ~~~~~~~ a Ey SEc ~,~ ~ `e c° E 'm "E`y E og g _ c $C 2 E e4_ 5 3 r= Et E ~ ~g [ 5 ~~3 ~S Z ~ 4 ~~ S~ e 'e~ c cz 8~ ~ _ s= E5 5: g ~ § 54 Sa s _ ; a+ EE °~ 1~€ ` 2~ O s 8 2 E°s ~~- a S ~ ~ ~aa o 3 =. ~ ~ s E. c€~ ~ S ~ e ° E ~'.e ~ x e S C e ap ~ $g ~ ~ p p € E_ (0 EbE w.E o_ £ U 3£ a ~ ~ c O~E ~:: SPY: V ~ .l gs d ~ °° e ~ e.yY ~--+ ~ p ~~~ S p F=+g 33 ~ ~mfi E E~~? 3o s~€ ~ ~p"• §'~ 3 yy p y y C ~ ~ 3 '& ~ -e w w N A+ A~ ~ O W i W V ~ ~,A ~ V/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-+ _ _~ '~ ~ J N ~ V d *+ ~ V ~ .~ Q ~ = N ~ ~ _ Q U 8 ~. ~ n o m W DD C Y Q & " o ~ E 3 o 1W o `o 3 a e O 3 ~ 2 V -, a 3 i ~ 3~~~ ~ e ~ N A~ W H }'!\ .~ ~~ N o~S ~ ~ V .g ~~ ~F #f,$~ Y¢ 9 ~.g ~~` ~4~ E ~. 9e~ rc ~ ~i~~~ ~~•- ka~~ `~ r ._ V N A~ A+ W W ~1•~ /~~ _W A 0 N U ~ ~+ _ ~ •- ~ ~ s m V { c~ ~ _. o ~, , ~ ~ L_ ^~ ~ ~ ~y i .~ E S i f F t ~- ~ ti ~~ 0 ^L i.i U O z c 1 O J L U c~ c~ c U L Q~ Q~ U L ~ ~ ~ ~U > c o a~ z~ ~~ c~ ~ ~ ,~ L ~ 0 U ~~