HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/08/04 - Agenda Packet CITY COUN'CIL
AGEN D,A
CITY OF RAN(.'.i',iHO CUCAiMONGA
IlllllllllI Illllimlllllmllmm I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIII IIII I
REG[.JLAR ME~ETI~NGS
1 st amPI 3rd 'Wednesdays-,, 7:()0 p,,m
Artgrist 4,, 1999
Civic Center
Co'tmc.~l Chambe:rs
1. 0500 Cii'v:k: Cer~.ter D,r:ive
R. anc:ho Ct:~x:;amo:nga,,, CA 91730
City Co'tmcilmeinl~ers
W ii 1] :i am J ,, A '.[ e:x a:m:]. er ,,,
James V, Cm:'ata],c>,,, (?ou:nci~mem:bei,
Bob Dk:attcm,~ (?ou,n:c'ih:nembe~,
Jack Lain,, Ci(~: M~:~:nager
James L. Markman,,, Ci0,"
Debra .:],, Adams;,,, CiO' Clerk
City Of~fice:: 477,.,,27()0
. ~;Ji'~ City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander , Biane~
Curatalo __, Dutton __ and Williams __
B, ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Dianna Lee-Mitchell for her
service to the Community Foundation.
2. Introduction of Fire Department personnel promoted to Fire
Captain - Sam Spagnolo, Don Kloughesy and Steve Taylor, and
Fire Engineer - Mike Costello and Dan Holloway.
C, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. Theywill be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/14/99 (98/99), 7/14/99 1
(99/00), 7/21/99 (98/99)and 7/21/99 (99/00)and Payroll ending
7/8/99 for the total amount of $2,770,435.52.
2. Approval of applicant name change for Alcoholic Beverage 16
Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for El Tarasco Market,
Aguilar Gerardo Horta & Hernandez Jorge Cueliar, 8161 W.
Foothill Blvd.
3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and 18
Wine for the Taco Factory, KGL, Inc., George Guillen, Jr., 9799
Base Line.
~;~-~ City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 2
4. Approval of a Resolution in support of "The Fair Competition and 20
Taxpayers Savings Act" Initiative.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-170 22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF
"THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER
SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE
5. Approval of annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 45
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for CUP 96-
09, located at the southeast corner of Carnelian Street and Almond
Street, submitted by SANBAG.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-171 46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR CUP 96-09
6. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security 49
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 8 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for
Tract Map No. 15798, located south of Highland Avenue, East of
East Avenue, submitted by Ryland Homes of California, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-172 51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 15798 AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 99-173 52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15798
'~ ~'i~i~ City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 3
7. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Faithful Performance 55
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond (Certificate of Deposit) and file
a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 15519,
located on the east side of Teak Way north of Victoria, submitted
by Inland Acoustics and Teak Way Associates.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-174 56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15519,
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOP, THE WORK
8. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful 59
Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice
of Completion for Improvements for CUP 97-05, located on the
northeast corner of Ninth Street and Vineyard Avenue, submitted
by Searing Industries.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-175 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-05 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOP` THE WORK
9. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, Number 62
439904S, and accept Maintenance Bond for Tract 14803,
generally located on the northeasterly side of Elm Avenue, east of
Spruce Avenue.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $367,000.00
#439904S
Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 36,700.00
#439904S
64
10. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, Number
428205S, and accept Maintenance Bond for Tract 15526,
generally located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and
Mountain View Drive.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond: $510,700.00
fi428205S
Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 51,070.00
#428205S
'~~ City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 4
11. Approval to recommend rejection of all bids received for janitorial 66
services for City-wide facilities as non-responsive to the needs of
the City.
12. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 67
99-071) in the amount of $556,261.42 ($505,692.20 plus 10%
contingency) for the construction of the Fourth Street
Rehabilitation and Storm Drain Project, from Utica Avenue to
Pittsburgh Avenue to the apparent low bidder, Vance Corporation,
to be funded from AD 82-1 R, Account No. 93-4130-6028, approval
to appropriate $579,000.00 from the Fund Balance of AD 82-1 R to
be placed in AD 82-1R Account No. 93-4130-6028 for the project
including construction surveying and soils and materials testing.
13. Approval of Historic Landmark Designation 99-01 - Ronald and 71
Kathleen Schulfer - an application to designate the Koch House as
a local landmark, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue-APN:
1100-021-01.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-176 84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC
LANDMARK 99-01 TO DESIGNATE THE KOCH
HOUSE (BUILT IN APPROXIMATELY 1908)AN
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7491
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-021-01
14. Approval of a Mills Act Agreement 99-01 (CO 99-072) - Ronald 71
and Kathleen Schulfer- a request to implement the use of the Mills
Act to reduce property tax on the Koch House (built in 1908), a
historic landmark, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 1100-
021-01. Related files: Landmark designation 99-01 and
Conditional Use Permit 99-28.
15. Approval of Environmental Assessment, Tentative Tract 16000, 99
and Design Review 99-13 - Lewis Apartment Communities - a
proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium
purposes; along with Design Review of 606 apartment units on 16
acres of land, located within the Terra Vista Planned Community.
The site boundary is formed by spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24 - 30 dwellings units per acre),
proposed development density is within the Medium High
Residential density (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077-
421-55 and 60. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 5
RESOLUTION NO. 99-177 179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 16000, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
OF 16 ACRES OF LAND INTO 6 LOTS FOR
CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE HiGH
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY
(14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED
BY CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM AVENUE,
AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS iN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 1077-
421-55 AND 60.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-178 192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 99-13, IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN
THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (14-24
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA
VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY
CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM AVENUE, AND
SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND
60
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No items submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
"~!/~ City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 6
1. CONSIDERATION OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 211
99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to
designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the
southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729
Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-
Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02,
Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use
Permit 99-08. (Continued from July 7, 1999 meeting.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-150 286
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC
LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02, TO
DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE (BUILT IN
APPROXIMATELY 1934) AS AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM
STREET, AT 6729 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1076-111-09
2. CONS!DERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 211
GENERAl... PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW
ARCHITECTS - An application to change General Plan land use
designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of
Hermosa Ave. & 19"~ St. - APN: 1076-111-09. Staff has prepared
a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Related ~es: Development District Amend. 99-02, Conditional
Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
(Continued from July 7, 1999 meeting.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-151 288
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO
CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES
OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM
STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09
City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 7
3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 211
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the
Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2
-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4 - 8
dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5. I acres of land located
on the southeast corner of Hermosa Ave. and 19th Street - APN:
1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan Amendment 99-02,
Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation
99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from July
7, 1999.)
ORDINANCE NO. 607 (first reading) 290
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL
TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES
OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM
STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE 211
PERM!T 99-08 - CURRY BRAN DAW ARCHITECTS - A request to
construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the
elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on
approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner
of Hermosa Avenue and 19~ Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related
files: Pre-Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation
99-02. (Continued from July 7, 1999.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-152 293
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 99-08 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF A TWO-STORY
RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY CONSISTING
OF 114 SUITES FOR THE ELDERLY iN THE
LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON
APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1076-111-09
City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 8
5. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO 308
CUCAMONGA- An amendment regarding the filing of applications
and sign copies on monument signs.
ORDINANCE NO. 608 (first reading) 315
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE REGARDING MONUMENT SIGNS AND
TO RESTRICT SUBMITTAL OF SAME
APPLICATION WITHIN 12 MONTHS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING 317
COMMI.SSION'S DECISION IN DENYING A REC~UEST TO
DISPLAY A MULTI-COLORED WALL SIGN - FUNCOl.AND - The
consideration of a request from Funcoland appealing the Planning
Commission's decision in denying the request to display a multi-
colored wall sign within Terra Vista Town Center, located at 10730
Foothill Boulevard, Suite 140 -APN: 1077-421-75. (Appeal has
been withdrawn by Applicant.)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 319
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE UTILITY USER'S FEES
ORDINANCE NO. 558-C (first reading) 320
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES
.. City Council Agenda
August 4, 1999 9
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY 324
SUBCOMMITTEE'S APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND LIBRARY
FOUNDATION
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K__. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO TUESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1999, 4:30 P.M.
FOR A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, LOCATED IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES
CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE CIVIC CENTER, LOCATED AT 10500
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on July 29, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting
per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
C~TY OF RANCHO CUCAHONQA
LIST OF NARRANTB
FOR PERIOD: 07-14-99
RUN DATE: 07/14/99 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCR[PTION NARR NO NARR. AMT.
*~ CHECK# OVERLAP
30865 PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. REIMBURSEMENT FOR OVERPAYMENT 131427* 843.&0-
~< 131428 - 139290
11439 YM SUBSCRIPTION 139291* 12.97-
5199 LASER LINE LIBRARY 139880* 53.82-
<~4 139881 - 140597
4289 PHONG, LORRAINE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 140598 94.70-
881 VANCE CORPORATION BASELINE ROAD WIDENING # 140900* 177,120.97
&l&3 GOOD CHEVROLET EGUIPMENT # 141280* 19,47&.82-
<<( 141281 - 141382
&090 KONG, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 141383* 480. O0
C<C 141384 - 141385
&l&3 OOOD CHEVROLET EGUIPMENT 14138~* 19,938.07
((( 141387 - 141438
4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES # 141439 251.83
1 AA EGUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 141440
6271 ABBEY EVENT8 SERVICES RECREATION REFUND 141441 258. 50
2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141442 79.00
5803 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EMPLOYMEMT SERVICES 141443 &8. O0
21327 AGUILAR, MARTHA RECREATION REFUND 141444 85.00
4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SERVICE # 141445 314.49
3448 ALL WELDING MAINTENANCE REPAIRS # 141446 110.00
973 ALPHAGRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES 141447
5658 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY SUPPLIES # 141448 282.66
4436 AMERITECH LIBRARY SERVICES SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 141449 369.88
2299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141450 106.61
6184 ASME ACCOUNTING DEPT. RECREATION REFUND 141451 6,600.00
21328 BANDY, dENNIFER RECREATION REFUND 141452 25.00
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141453 309. 58
21334 BECKNER, DORIS RECREATION REFUND 141454 4~.00
21335 BEDFORD, ELLEN RECREATION REFUND 141455 37.50
4441 BEST BUY CO., INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 141456
1247 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 1414~7
1478 BNI BUILDING NEWS SUBSCRIPTION 141458 741.04
21329 BOLTON, THERESA RECREATION REFUND 1414~9 &O. 00
21332 BOWMAN, MEG RECREATION REFUND 141460 130.00
43~9 BRODART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 141461 132.15
3193 BRUNICK, ALVAREZ & BATTERSBY BOOKING FEES 141462 60. O0
5341 BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANT SERVICES # 1414~3 3o490.05
4412 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 141464 227. 93
4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141465 577.98
5881 CARTE GRAPH SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141466 4,750.23
21333 CAULEY, SUE RECREATION REFUND 141467 85.00
488 CHEVRON U S A, INC GASOLINE CHARGES 141468 192.53
6215 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND # 141469 200.12
2133& COBLE, VICKI RECREATION REFUND 141470 100.00
2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141471 344.55
4301 COMPUSA, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141472 750.46
21331 COSTA, WENDY RECREATION REFUND 141473 37.50
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA
LIST OF NARR~T8
FOR PERIOD: 07-14-99 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 07/14/99
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR, AMT.
** CHECK# OVERLAP
623& COSTCO ¢/0 HOUSEHOLD BANK, F.S.g. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141474 161.61
~( 141475 - 141476
S5 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 141477
21330 CUE, STACEY RECREATION REFUND 141478 30.00
239 D & K CONCRETE CO STREET MAINTENANCE # 141479 4,744.46
36721 DAVIS, dOE ANN RECREATION REFUND 141480 51.00
347 DAY-TIMERS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 141481 21.27
4932 DEAN'S GREENS NURSERY NURSERY SUPPLIES 141482 30.17
4366 DEMCO, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES # 141483
109 DICTAPHONE CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS # 141484 408.25
839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 14148~ 97.8&
4109 DIRECT EDGE, INC. MAINTENANCE E~UIPMENT # 141486 12~.44
3~722 DUVALL, KAREN RECREATION REFUND 141487 100.00
779 E-Z RENTALS RECREATION RENTAL # 141488 375.88
36723 EDWARDS, TAWNYA RECREATION REFUND 141489 29.00
2422 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES # 141490 83.&3
4524 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EGUIPMENT INC. LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 141491 516.73
6251 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES, INC. SUPPLIES 141492 1,833.60
2349 ESGIL CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 141493 10,717.35
3~89 EYERLY, MELANIE RECREATION REFUND 141494 37.50
5917 FASTENAL COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141495 70.69
155 FILAR5KY & WATT MONTHLY SERVICES # 141496 1,125.00
3670& FRANZOSO, SUN-HYE RECREATION REFUND 141497 48.00
5833 FRITTS FORD EGUIPMENT 141498 18,000.00
36719 FULGHAM SHOWER PANS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141499 81.00
36724 GARCIA, BRIAN RECREATION REFUND 141500 40.00
36725 GEAGAo CHEN OR DON RECREATION REFUND 141501 200.00
5157 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIES & SERVICE 141502 251.0&
36726 GIANDOMENICO, SUSAN RECREATION REFUND 14150~
36720 GOLD MOUNTAIN MORTGAGE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141504 323.60
3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE5 # 141505 8,190.00
36650 GOODLING, IRENE RECREATION REFUND 141506 37. 50
36727 OOTT, SYLVIA RECREATION REFUND 141507 50.00
3827 GREEN ROCK POWER EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141508 115.01
367~ GREEN, DIANE RECREATION REFUND 141509 40.00
36729 GREENE, MARY RECREATION REFUND 141510 15.00
137 gTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 141511 83.78
31615 HAMILL, KELLY RECREATION 141512 24.00
2855 HAVEN WINE & LIGUOR CO. SUB-COMMITTEE MEETINGS # 141513 434.00
31616 HEIL, MARY RECREATION 141514 37.50
G1622 HOLK, DIANA RECREATION 141515 42.50
158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141516 580.13
2255 HOLT'~ AUTO ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141517 172.40
~ 141518 - 141518
40G3 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141519 2,806.74
4852 HOPKINS, LORI MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 141520 100.64
161 HOYT LUMBER CO., ~.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141521 69.23
4~5 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141522 64.68
167 I C B 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141523 109.85
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141524
3885 INLAND LA~NMONER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 141525
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIBT OF W~RRANTB
FOR PERIOD: 07-t4-99
RUN DATE: 07/14/99 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT,
** CHECK# OVERLAP
4747 INLANO LIBRARY SYSTEM MEMBERSHIP DUES # 141526 124.45
6259 INLAND MAILING SERVICE$~ INC. RECREATION REFUND 141527 343. 58
908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RE80L. 141528
2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141529 803.21
31617 JARVISo JOHN RECREATION 141530 75. O0
31619 JOHNSON, SHANA RECREATION 141531 46.00
31618 JREIJEo MAR~O RECREATION 141532 160.00
5901 JT ASPHALT MILLING INC. MAINTENANCE 141533 800.00
31604 KEELING, SHEILA LIBRARY 141534
21337 KENNEDY, DENESE RECREATION # 141535
1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141536 364.60
6260 KRAMER'S MASONRY RECREATION REFUND 141537 2,100~00
31621 KURTH, JANICE RECREATION 141538 80.00
6155 KYPTA ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 141539 3,410. 57
5199 LASER LINE LIBRARY 141540 53.82
31623 LEALo SUSAN RECREATION 141541 37.50
4861 LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141542 76.14
549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 141543 32,973. 57
4727 MARSHALL PLUMBIN~ REHAB. PRO~RAM # 141544 504.48
4&O MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141545 48.10
i~.&l MAVERICK SEED COMPANY RECREATION REFUND 141546 188. 56
31620 MAYS, SUSAN RECREATION 141547 40.00
1025 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141548 559. 37
31613 METRIC PROPERTY MGMT. INC BUSINESS LICENSE 141549 128.15
5852 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 141550 269.91
31625 MILLER, dOANNE RECREATION 141551
2597 MINNESOTA WESTERN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141552 343.34
31624 MITCHELL, SHAWNA RECREATION 141553 10.00
1171 MOTOROLA COMMUN. & ELEC., INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141554 32,732. 11
5663 MOYERo BILL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141555 1,380. O0
3316 MR T'S 24-HR. TOWING TOWING 141556 500.00
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 141557 102.&4
5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE # 141558
433 NIXON-EGLI EGUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 141559
31~26 NUNEZ, BERNADETTE RECREATION REFUND 141560 61.00
309 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, INC METROLINK 141561 60.00
523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 141562
31627 OLIVA, CHERYL RECREATION 141563 37.50
3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141564 237.06
3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 141565 37.71
(~ 141566 - 141566
5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141567 2,836.51
31628 ORR, BETH RECREATION 141568 37.50
31611 ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP MISC 141569 750.00
235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141570 1,856.25
31612 P A C M~ LLC BUSINESS LICENSE 141571 6.00
31629 PARRISH, GENELLE RECREATION 141572 35.00
5409 PARTSMASTER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141573 169,71
31630 PATRONITE, AMBER RECREATION 141574 37.50
4689 PHONG, LORRAINE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 141575 94.70
6211 PIONEER-STANDARD ELECTRONICS RECREATION REFUND # 141576 268o00641
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONQA
L~ST OF ~ARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 07-~4-99
RUN DATE: 07/14/99 PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARR. AMT.
~* CHECK# OVERLAP
45~4 P~TAE~, PETER J. ARCH!TECTURAL PROJECT 141577 345.42
255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 14157g
7S8 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUT[ON~ INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 141579 1.00
30865 PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. REIMBURSEMENT FOR OVERPAYMENT 141580 843.
~51 R & R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE 141581
6272 RAINBOWS END RECREATION REFUND 141582
~&4 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES # 141583 171.41
3016 RANCHO CUCAMONQA POLICE DEPT REIMBURSEMENT 141584 931. 20
5513 RANDOM HOUSE, INC. LIBRARY SUPPLIES 141585
4130 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141586 88.89
545 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS # 141587 ~74.57
5914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES # 141588
5618 RICHARDS, WATSON, & GERSHON LEOAL SERVICES # 141589 33,51~.83
~2& ROBLES~ RAUL P., SR. TIRE REPAIR 141590
11550 ROZMSON, dAMIE RECREATION REFUND 141591 200.00
4704 RUSH, CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 14159~
12~2 8 & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 141593 44.46
11546 SADDORIS, SHERRI EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 141594 8.90
300 SAN BERN COUNTY REIMS PARKING CITATIONS 141595 1,495.00
5029 SAN BERN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. UNDERGROUND TANKS 141596 74.75
301 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 141597 6,788.94
301 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 141598 2,729. 88
11547 SEGARRA, PHILIP REFUN~ DISMISSED PKG CITATION 141599 20.00
4253 SH~I_IMAR TOURS & CHARTER RECREATION TRIP # 141600 21. 10
11135 SHEFFIELD HOMES, LLC TUP DEPOSIT REFUND 141~01 6~350.00
4513 SIMON & SCHUSTER LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 141602 176. 64
692 SIR SPEEDY OFFICE SUPPLIES 141603 302.78
1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES # 141604 197.79
11552 SMITH, ANGIE RECREATION REFUND 141605 37.50
3~78 SO CALIF EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS 14160~ 80,~00.29
~(< 141607 - 141607
317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS # 141608 83,468.61
317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 14160~
317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 141610 2,291.
~<~ 141611 - 141621
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 141~22
572~ SPECTRA COMPANY LABOR AND SUPPLIES 141~23 475.00
11545 SSR APARTMENT VALUE FUND LP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141624
3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 141~25 571.76
3&32 STEELWORKER8 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 141626
4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES 141627 &4.00
336 8URVEYOR~ SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141628 591.68
6225 SYMCAS-TS~, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141~29 750.00
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 141630 ~4.76
62&2 TEAM THOMPSON RECREATION REFUND 141631 60.00
11548 TEASLEY~ MARIA REFUND DISMISSED P½G CIT 141632 30.00
3942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 141633
11553 THIBODEAUX~ IRMA RECREATION REFUND 141634
11554 THO~I~RTIN, TANYA RECREATION REFUND 141635 42.00
6~74 THOMPSON, ROBERT PERMIT REFUNDS 141636 216. 50
11555 TINGLEY, EMILY RECREATION REFUND 141637 40.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANT8
FOR PERIOD: 07-14-99 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 07/14/99 PAGE: 5
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
** CHECK# OVERLAP
11556 TRUJILLO, DAVID RECREATION RENTAL REFUND 141638 200.00
45~S U 8 GUARD8 CO., INC, SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 141639 988,71
5601 UNIGUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. MANAGEMENT SERVICES # 141640 281. 89
12~6 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 141641 12.99
11557 VALLEDOR~ JOSIE RECREATION REFUND 141642 15. O0
11558 VAN BREUKELEN, E.J. RECREATION REFUND 141643 13.00
881 VANCE CORPORATION BASELINE ROAD WIDENING # 141644 442~574.69
5285 VIKING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES 141645 404.56
1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES # 141646 4,520.97
6263 VISUAL IMAGING PRODUCTS RECREATION REFUND # 141647 233.55
2340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES MAINT SERVICE & REPAIRS # 141648 731.66
11551 WAN~, SHU RECREATION REFUND 141649 37. 50
213 WAXIE~ KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 141650 11,042.03
4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 141651 1,074.31
5526 WEST GROUP PUBLISHING 141652 98.3~
675 WYNN'S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES 141653 467.06
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 141654 721.57
11549 YARBOROUGH & COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141655 ~67.00
1143~ YM SUBSCRIPTION 141656 12.97
2021 YORK INDUSTRIES GRAFFITI REMOVER 1416~7 237.05
11559 ZAVALETTA~ LUIS RECREATION REFUND 141658 ~2.00
** TOTAL 1,403,598.82
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 07-14-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 07/14/~9 PAGE: !
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
#* CHECK# OVERLAP
43~5 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CA. ~ND (~UARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 141194# 79,488. 50
!79 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 14119~# ~8,378.81
791 PMI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 141198* 1,144.80
~<< 1411~7 - 141197
481 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL PREMIUM 141198* 31,343.79
444 1411~ - 141202
4457 5CRRA ROCHESTER ORADE CROSSING 141803* I50.00
744 NATIONAL DEFERRED DEFERRED COMP 141204* 2,212.00
5882 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 01 141~0~*
5882 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 01 141206# 2,192.50
58S2 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 01 141~07# 1,151.74
103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP 141208# 769.00
((C 141209 - 141383
~037 TESTO, JR, EDDIE RECREATION REFUND 141~4# 700.00
499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING 141385* 8,933.~2
(~ 141388 - 141388
11704 SCANDIA AMUSEMENT PARK RECREATION FIELD TRIP 141387* 273.70
~4 141~88 - 1413~9
378~ ACTION ART RECREATION SUPPLIES 141390 480.83
14 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY AIRLINE TICKET8 1413~1 13~.00
8172 ALTA LOM~ CHARTER LINES DEPOSIT 141392 300.00
3957 ARTCRAFT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 141393 222.23
~428 ASSISTANCE LEAOUE OF UPLAND LEASE AOREEMENT 141394 1,200.00
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDHARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141395 95. 40
1247 BLARE PAPER CO., INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 141398 47.80
6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING FEE 141397 3~.48
21501 CORNERPOINTE 85 LLC OVERPAYMENT OF PERMIT FEES 141398
5~08 COVILLE~ TERRY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 141399 1,207. 50
6145 DAVIS, SAM CONTRACT SERVICES 141400 450.00
80 DELTA DENTAL DENTAL INSURANCE 141401 23,~47.88
44~8 DOUBLETREE HOTEL RESERVATION FEES 141402 27~. O0
4937 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING RECREATION SUPPLIES # 141403 1,020.80
528~ EVANS SPORTING GOODS RECREATION SUPPLIES 141404 11.86
2485 FOOTHILL SELF STORAGE STORAGE UNIT RENTAL # 141405 3,240. O0
4386 OREQORY~ CHERI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141406 211.20
5387 OST TELECOM CALIFORNIA INTERNET SERVICES 141407 1,060. O0
~ 141408 - 141408
137 OTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 14140~ 1,083.22
1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAOES, LTD. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 141410 1,490. O0
907 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE 141411
2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 141412 34.43
8090 KONO, ~OPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141413 380. O0
4784 KULI IMAOE INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 141414 1,997.88
1455 LONQ'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSINO 141415 15.04
~882 LOS ANOELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION ~JPPLIES 141418
31803 MAYNARD, REBECCA SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM 141417 85.00
2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. #3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES # 141418 231.95
4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 141419 140.13
5252 NATIONAL COMM DEV ASSOCIATION DUES 141420 1,440.00
31802 NAVARRO, CARMEN MEETING 141421 1~.00
4327 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS 72 DOZEN SOFTBALLS 141422 3,642.38
CITY OF R~NCHO CUC~ONQA
LXST OF W~RRANTS
FOR P~XOD: 07-X4-99
R~ DATE: 07/14/~ PAOE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DEBCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT.
** CHECK~ OVERLAP
31614 PARIS, CHRIS RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 141423 34B.~
4401 PRAXAXR DISTRIBUTION, INC. EQUXPHENT RENTAL 141424 i90.22
32~ PRX~IPAL ~TU~ NED[CAL/D[SABXL[TY INSURANCE 14142~ 75,136.
2&4 RALPHS GROCERY CONPANY RECREATXON G~PL[EB ~ 14142& 114.
22B RA~HO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REXHB~SE GRANT FUNDS 141427 ta, 00
3368 RES~CE DIRECTORY RESO~CE DIRECTORY 1414~B 20. O0
1~0 ~AN BERN C~NTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. ANIHAL C~TROL SERVICES e 141429 ~0.00
4253 SH~INAR TO~S · CHARTER RECREATION TRIP 141430
1327 ~MART & FINAL DAY CAMP 8~PLIE8 e 141431
~278 S~THERN SPIRIT B~INE~S LICENSE REFUND 141432 aO0.00
35;7 STATE OF C~LIFORNIA A~UAL RENT-TRaNSFER SITE 141433 3,000.00
11703 TEEN ~UBSCRIPTIQN 141434
5~ T~8~ Q~IL G~PLY REIMBURSEMENT 14143~ 1~.
2~8~ UNITED 8TRTE~ POSTAL ~ERVICE POSTAGE METER HONTHLY 8ERVICE8 141436
** TOTAL 293,31&.~8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LIST OF #ARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 07-21-99 ¢98/99)
RUN DATE: 07/21/99
VENDOR NAME ITE# DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARRo ANT.
~ CHECK# OVERLAP
Z597 MINNESOTA WESTERN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141551 343034-
<Cc 141553 - 141583
3016 RANCHO CUCA#ONGA POLICE DEFT REIMBURSEMENT 141584 931~20-
CC¢ 141585 - 1415~S
5029 SAN BERN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. UNOERGROUNO TANKS 141596 74.75-
(¢¢ 1,1597 - 141~64 )))
10 A ~ R TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 141665 783.96
5792 ADAM, ROBERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141666 144.00
5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, ZNC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8 141d~T 3,750.00
21338 AHLANDER, JE#NA RECREATION REFUND 141668 70.00
CCC 141669 - 141669
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS 8 141670 3.171.89
21361 ARAS,N. PAT REXMBURSE#ENT 141671 86000
1430 ARERICAN BUSINESS FORHS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 141672 2.832060
5807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES B 141673 3,192045
S864 ASL CONSULTING ENGZNEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 141674 39,973.OO
213)9 ATHERTON, KARA RECREATION REFUND 141675 40.00
5756 AUDIO REPLACE#ENT TAPE SERVICE #AINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141676 9.60
ZZ)40 AYERS CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141677 7.00
*102 B ~ K ELECTRIC ¥HOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141678 358.64
53 BASELZNE TRUE VALUE NAROWARE HAINTENANCE SUPPLZES 141679 2.21
614Z BASSETT-S#ITH, TEBILT RECREATION REFUND 8 141680 35oll
21),1 BEDETH, CRISTY RECREATZON REFUND 141681 24°00
21342 8ERNZARD, MZLDRED RECREATION REFUND 141682 66000
21343 BIRCHEFF, DARLA RECREATION REFUND 141683 14000
41 BISHOP CORPANT #AINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 141684 1,687.65
21344 80HANNON, KATHY RECREATION REFUND 14160S 50.00
21345 BONAFEDE, VICTORZA RECREATION REFUNO 141686 TToSO
*833 BOOKS ON TAPE, ZNCo LIBRARY SUPPLIES 141687 S.39
4699 BORONER, MARGIE INSTRUCTOR PUT 141618
21346 BRANOE, DEBORAH RECREATION REFUND 141689 33.00
21347 BROWN, JUDY RECREATION REFUND 14169O 8S.00
21348 BURTON, BRIGBYTE RECREATION REFUND 141691
21349 BYRNE, MAGGIE RECREATION REFUND 141692 60.00
11S9, CALMA D.M.D., TRINIDAD C. BUSINESS LZCENSE REFUNDS 141693 45.73
21352 CAMARZLLO, NANCY RECREATION REFUND 141694 30.00
ZXSS) CA#PBELL, RON RECREATION REFUND 14169S 0o00
2135, CHACON, CARNEN RECREATION REFUND 141696 66.00
21355 tHAN, BELO#ICA RECREATION REFUND 141&97 SO.00
6052 CHARTER CO#NUNZCATZONS ADVERTISING FEE 141698 1,751.75
21356 CHAVEZ, #ARIA RECREATION REFUND 141699 SR. OO
73 CITRUS NOT,RS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE NAINTENANCE/SUPPLZES 8 141700 2,696.86
4363 COLTON SURVEYZNG ZNSTRW4ENTS EQUZPRENT RENTAL 141701 511081
11357 COHBS, SALLY RECREATION REFUND 141702 37oS0
4301 CORPUSA, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES J 141703 6,019,18
643 CO#PUTERLANB COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 161704
2362 COMSERCO~ INC. SERVICE/REPAIRS 8 14170B B01.08
21358 CODPER-CANZONERZ, KAY RECREATION REFUND 141706 SOoO0
11359 ¢ORRALE$~ HARTHA RECREATION REFUND 141707 IT. 00
21360 COSTA, WENOY RECREATION REFUND 141708 25o00
CCC 141709 - 141710
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 07-21--99 ¢9B/g9)
RUN DATE: 07/21/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NAHE ZTEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO #ARE. ANT°
~ tHEe&# OVERLAP
85 CUCAHONGA CO WATER DXST NONTHLY WATER BILLINGS 0 141711 ZO,SIB.54
239 D & K CONCRETE CO STREET HAXNTENANCE I 14171Z 158.39
4282 D 7 CONSULTING INC. NAZNTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLIES 141~13 1,S00.00
ZB4 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 141714
3909 DEPARTHENT OF CONSERVATION STRONG NOTION FEE 141715
4105 DEPARTHENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 141716 2,112.00
105 DERBXSH GUERRA & ASSOC. CONTRACT SERVICES J 141717 8,42S.00
36730 OODSON, HISTY RECREATION REPUNO 141718 6Z.50
977 E S R X, INC. SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 0 141719 1,292.80
36731 ECHEVARRXA, H. SON3A RECREATION REFUNO 141720 85.00
36732 ELDREDGE, DIANE RECREATION REFUND 141721 75.00
36733 ESCOBEDO, 3ULXE RECREATION REFUND 141722 S6000
36734 ESPINOZA, DEANNA RECREATION REFUND 141723 37.50
5262 EVANS SPORTING GOODS RECREATION SUPPLIES · 141724 277.30
229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES J 141725 402026
5521 EXPERIAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1417Z6 50.00
3673S FEOELE~ OZANE RECREATION REFUNO 141727 42.50
36590 FELIX, NARY RECREATION REFUND 141728 34.00
36736 FERREXRA, CORRXE RECREATION REFUND 141729 50.00
6289 FOLKLORZCO ESPXRXTU LATIN, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 141730 100.00
2840 FORO OF UPLAND, INC. VEHICLE #iINTENANCE # 141731 2,495.~4
560~ FRAWLEY, KEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 141732 ZOO.00
6074 FUKUSHXHA, 3UOXTH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 141733 1,335.00
36668 FULLHER CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUND 141734 1,000.00
4540 GALE GROUP, THE LIBRARY BOOKS 141735 116.83
3992 GXBBY°S FENCING HATERIALS HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 141736 SB3.43
36737 GILBERT, REBECCA RECREATION REFUND 141737 29.00
36641 GILBERT, SUSAN RECREATION REFUND 141738
36561 GXLLX, CHRISTOPHER TUITION REXNBURSENENT 141739 91.00
36738 GOLZAN, REBECCA RECREATION REFUND 141740 40.00
6163 GOO0 CHEVROLET EQUXPHENT 141741 377.!3
36739 GUTIERREZ, JENNIFER RECREATION REFUND 141742
36740 GUYAN, CHERYL RECREATION REFUND 141743 66.00
4525 HAAKER EQUXPNENT CO. NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 141744 38.69
31636 HAXDET, NANNETTE RECREATION 141745 40000
6217 HARO E~XNEERXNG BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 141746 S60.00
31637 HAYNE, TERESA RECREATION 141747 Z9.00
820 HEARD P.H.D., EDWARD INSTRUCTOR P#T 141748 42.00
31635 HENRY, DORA RECREATION 141749 37.50
158 HOLLXDAY ROCK CO., INC. NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141750 118.23
31634 HOOPER, DEDNOREA RECREATION 141751 IS.00
1234 HOSENAN NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES # 141752 207.59
3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDBG CONTRACT 1417S3 613.00
31670 HUANG, INGRID RECREATION 141754 48.00
1111 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE 1417SS 239.60
3716 INLAND E#PZRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. HEN'S~SOCCER PROGEAR d 1417B6 3,906.00
3885 ZNLANO LAWNHOWER VEHICLE #AXNTENANCE 141757 67o~4
908 INLAND HEDXATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESDL. 141758 909004
4718 INLAND TOP SOIL #XXES #AZNTENANCe SUPPLIES # 141759 ~6.00
122 INLAND VALLIY OAILY BULLETIN AOVERTZSZNG # 141760 6d0Z5o74
31642 JENNXNG$~ BRIAN RICREATZON 141761 29o00
CXTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LXST OF UARRANTS
FOR PERZOO: 07-22-99 C98/09)
RUN DATE:
VENDOR NAHE XTEN DESCRXPTXON UARR NO #ARR. ANT.
~ CHECK# OVERLAP
17S JOBS AVAXLABLE ADVERTXSENENTS 141762 101.20
31641 JONES, DOROTHY RECREATXON 141763 29.S0
31646 KABXR, KARXNA RECREATION 141764 40.00
31647 KATZ, HARXLYN RECREATZON 141768 80.00
31643 KELLEHER, DEBBY RECREATXON 141766
4128 KELLY EQUXPNENT VEHZCLE SUPPLXES 141767 Z07o84
4552 KE#HER, JA#XCE ZNSTRUCTOR PAY#ENT 141768 225oO0
3Z644 KXEHL, KATHY RECREATXON 141769
!2~8 KNOX #AXNTENANCE SUPPLZES Z41770 164o86
31662 KRANER, KATHY RECREATXON ~41771 37oS0
3Z645 KURASHXGE, KELLY RECREATXON 141772 42000
32632 L L R CONSTRUCTZON BUSZNESS LZCENSE 141773 26o9S
3X632 LA#BCO ENGXNEERZNG XNCo BUSXNESS LZCENSE 141774 63.30
32655 LEAR, GEOFF RECREATXON 141775
31656 LEVER, CAROL RECREATXON 14~776 ZS.00
5884 LXLOURN CORPORATZON PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES J ~41777 8,040.64
31653 LXTTLE, JUDXTH RECREATZON 141778 Z.00
31654 LOCK~OOD, PATTX RECREATZON 141779 SOoO0
3156 LU'S LZGHTHOUSE, XNCo OXL ANALVSZS # 141780 381.40
31633 N G R UOOD PRODUCTS, XNCo BUSXNESS LXCENSE 141781
S437 NACGREGOR RECREATZON 14!781 68°98
¢CC 14X783 - 141783
549 #ARXPOSA HORTXCULTURAL ENT. ZNC. LANDSCAPE #AZNTENANCE J 141784 56,190o58
4727 MARSHALL PLU#BXNG REHAB. PRODRAN I 141788 TZO.3~
460 #ARTZN & CHAPHAN CO IMZNTENANCE SUPPLXES 141786 96o10
3907 HASTER-SORT, ZNC. PRESORT #AXL SERVZCES ~41787
31667 NATRZNEZ, JOANN RECREATZON ZAZ788 30.00
S183 HAYER, CABLE & PALHER PROFESSZONAL $ERVXCE 14~789 ~,ZT2.00
31668 #CDANZEL, ROB RECREATZON 141790 4Zo00
31665 NENDOZA, PEARL RECREATZON 141791 50o00
6ZTO HZCROAGE CD#PUTERNART ~994 CTE DUES ' 0 !41792 23t664o78
2597 NXNNESOTA NE$TERN NAZNTENANCE $UPPLXES # 141793 364oSZ
3X648 #ZRAFLOR, #ARTXNA RECREATXON ~4~794 40.00
31666 #OLXNE, THERESA RECREATZON 141795 60°00
31660 MORGAN, DELL RECREATZON 14Z796 36.00
~XTX NDTDRDLA CONNUN. & ELECo, XNC NAZNTE#ANCE SUPPLZES # ~41797 1,171.80
31649 NAVA, dOSE RECREATXON 141798 56.10
31659 NELSON, KXH RECREATXON ~4~799 33.00
3~650 NORHANDt 3UL2E RECREATZON ~41800
32664 0'BRZANT, VALERZE RECREATZON 14J801 37oS0
31669 OCANA, ESTELLA RECREATZDN 141~02 40.00
523 OFFXCE DEPOT OFFXCE SUPPLXES 8 141803
5403 OFFXCE NAX OPFXCE SUPPLXES J 141804 168.88
3AS OLD QUAKER PAXNT CO~4PANY #AXNTENAKE $UPPLXES 0 24~108 912.66
34Z9 ON CALL COHPUTER SUPPLY #AZNTENANCE SUPPLXES 141806 131.77
5702 ON HXTN LEAR#XNG, XNC. #AXNTENANCE SUPPLXE5 0 141807
S462 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ 141808
2911 P A P A PESTXCZDE APPLZCATORS SENXNAR X4X809 135o00
338 PACZFZC EQUXPT & ZRRZGATXON, XNC. #AXNTENANCE SUPPLXES ~ 1418~0
31638 PARXSH, DON RECREATXON 14181~ 34.00
5318 PARKER, SHANNON XNSTRUCTOR PAY#ENT 141812 48°00
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LXST OF ¥ARRANTS
FOR PERZOO: 07-21-99 C98/99)
RUN DATE: 07/21/99 PAGE:
VENOOR NANE ITEN DESCRIPTZON YARN NO ¥ARR. AKT.
Qm CHECK# OVERLAP
31663 PATTERSON, CHRZSTZNE RECREATZON 161813 40.00
31652 PAYNE, NANCY RECREATZON 141814 65.00
31651 PENA, GZNA KECREATZON 141815 42o00
757 PEP BOYS VEHZCLE #AXNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ 141816 Z8.ZO
31661 PEREZ, ALZDA RECREATZON ! 161817 38.00
31639 PEREZ. NATASSZA RECREATZON 14t8~8 30.00
31658 PZCO, KRXS RECREATXON 141819 35.00
4554 PZTASSZ. PETER J. ARCNZTECTURAL PROJECT # 141820 12..47
272 PXTNEY BONES POSTAGE #ETER RENTAL 141821 409°99
31657 POLZTE$, JANZE RECREATZON 141822 42*00
6288 PONONA VALLEY HARLEY-DAVZDSON BUSZNESS LICENSE REFUND 141823 48oS6
1049 PO#ONA VALLEY KANASAK! VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8 141824 645o76
31640 POTNOS, ROSE#ART RECREATZON 141825 50°00
7S8 PRAXAZR DZSTRZBUTZON, ZNC. NAZNT/RECREATZON SUPPLZES 141826 99.91
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY #AZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8 141817 617.87
5899 QUALZTY ONE ENGRAVERS OFFICE SUPPLZES 141828 10.78
¢<< 141829 - 141829
ZS1 R & R AUTOHOTZVE VEHZCLE NAZNT,SUPPLZES&SERVZCE # 141830 2,451.91
418 R N A GROUP $OZL TESTZNG SERVZCES # 14183! 3,838.00
5905 RAFFA, SUZIE ZN$TRUCTOR PAY#ENT 1418~2 546.00
11560 RAPOSARDZ, RAE RECREATZON 141833 S2.SO
3821 RE-PRZNT CORPORATZON OFFZCE SUPPLZES 141834 351.93
11561 RZDDLE, PRZSGZLLA RECREATION 141835 34.00
276 RXVERSZDE BLUEPRXNT PRXNTS 8 141836 521.80
3314 ROBXNSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLZES # 141837 2.940.01
5924 ROGAN BUZLOZNG SERVZCES JANZTORZAL SERVZCE 141838 7,461o59
16 ROTARY CORPORATZON NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8 141839 295.33
11562 RUZZ, PRANCES RECREATZON t 1,1840 41.00
11563 RUPP, BARBARA RECREATZON 1,18~1 24.00
11564 RUSSELL, KAREN RECREATZON 1418~Z 54.00
11S65 RUSSO, STEVE RECREATZON !418,3 40.00
11566 RYAN, DEBRA RECREATZON 14184* 65.00
11S67 SALAZAR. NEZFY RECREATION 1418. S 85.00
5538 SAN ANTONZO #ATERZALS #AINTENANCE SUPPLZES B 141~6 206.36
5029 SAN BERN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. UNOERGROUND TANKS 1,18~7 74o75
301 SAN BERN COUNTY SNERZFFS CONTRACT SHERZFFS SERVZCE 141848 931.20
132 SAN DZEGO ROTARY 8NOON CO. ZNC NAINT SUPPLZES 141849 124.99
11593 SANCHEZ GRADZNG BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUNDS 141850 62.90
11340 SANDOVAL, GABY RECREATZON REFUNDS 141851 4B.00
11568 SCATES. SUZANNE RECREATZON 1,1852 42.50
11569 $CHXLLER, HART ANN RECREATZON 141853 ZSoO0
11570 SCHNETZ, BRENDA RECREATZON 141854 98°00
1105 SEAL FURNZTURE & SYSTEHS ZNCo OFFICE SUPPLZES ~ 141855 1,925o00
218S SETON ZOBNTZFZCATZON PRODUCTS NAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES A 141BS6 125.08
11571 SHEA, HART RECREATION 141157 37.50
2507 SZEBE ENVZRON#ENTAL CONTROLS SERVZCE/SUPPLZES I 141158 1,013.00
11572 SZNGHAL, SHALIN! RECREATION 141859 33.00
l~SBS SZR#CO ZNDUST~ZAL CORP. BUSZNE$$ LZCENSE REFUNDS 141160
11573 SKARSET#9 DOROTHY RECREATION 141861
X~S?* SHZTN9 CATZNA RiCREATON Z4Zi41)2 30o00
~ISTS S#ZTH~ NANCY RECREATZON ~*ZI&3
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 07-21-99
RUN DATE: 07/21/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NA#E XTEH DESCRIPTION ¥ARR NO NARR. ANT.
DO CHECiJ OVERLAP
317 SO CALZF EDISON CO. NONTHLY ELECTRIC BXLLZNGS 141864 73.91
CCC 141865- 141~7
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON NONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS 0 141868 14,933.16
11576 SPENCER, KERRY RECREATION REFUND 161~9 29000
11577 STAHPS, ESTHER RECREATION REFUND 141870 6.00
4176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HAZARDOUS HASTE DISPOSAL # 141871 1,257.00
11S78 STILLWAGON, JOANNE RECREATION REFUND 141872 168.00
11579 STROUD, A#OZE RECREATION REFUND 1,1873 40.00
11580 TAPZA, ALVIN RECREATZON REFUNDS 141874 96.00
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRA# & DAY CA#P SUPPL 141875 7.52
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS NAXNT SUPPLIES J 161876 1,177.53
11581 TAYLOR, 3ANA RECREATZON REFUNDS 141877 50o00
11582 TORRES, ROBIN RECREATION REFUNDS 141878 29.00
11583 TORREZ, HXCHAEL RECREATION REFUNOS 141879 65.00
5238 TRANSANERXCAN SOIL LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 141080
7272 UNGASHZCK, JULIE REFUND PERS DEDUCTION 141881 250.00
4196 UPSCO SUPPLIES t SERVICE t 141802 8,604.60
11584 VACHANZ, NIKE RECREATION REFUNDS # 141083 69.00
11S86 VELEZ, JOSE RECREATZON REFUND 141884 24.00
11587 ¥ATTS, KAREN RECREATION REFUND 141805 S6.00
4331 NEST ENO YNCA FILES GRTLY REYXEN 8 141886 1,100.92
12588 NHXTNEV, KATHRYN RECREATZON REFUND 141087
11589 NOOLSEY, ANN HARZE RECREATION REFUND 141088
CCC 141889 - 141890
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY #ACHZNE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 141891
6249 XZOS PAINTING LEGISLATIVE #EETZNG 141892
11590 VANO, LISA RECREATION REFUND !4X893 24.00
11591 ZOUCHA, CRISTY RECREATION REFUND # 161894 55.00
11592 ZUNZGA, STEVEN RECREATION REFUND 141895 29.00
oo TOTAL 342,646.87
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LIST OF #ARRANTS
POR PERXODI 07-2E-99 C99/00)
RUN DATE: 0T/Z1/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ZTEN DE$CRZPTZON WARE NO UARR. ART.
4nik CHECKI OVERLAP
6269 OLSON, LENNART CONTRACT SERVICES 14SITTe 400°00-
44E6 GUARDIAN #EOICAL PREHIUH '141Z00~ 6T8o40
((¢ 141201 o 1414~ )))
1327 SHIRT & FINAL DAY CARP SUPPLZES
¢C( 141432 - 141659
315 LEAGUE OF CALIP CITIES ZNLAND EHPERE DZVo NEETING E416608 150o00
CC( 14166X-
~T32 ARC LOCKSNXTH$ ~ZNTENA~E SUPPLIES ~ ~41~8 3T.TZ
3785 ACTION ART RECREATX~ SUPPLIES I 141899 60199013
14 ACTION TRAVEL ~ENCV AIRLINE TICKETS 141NO
6290 ALLENe TONY RECREATION RE~ND 141HI 444000
4455 ANERZC~ ASSOC.OP ~DE ENFORCEMENT ~NUAL NE~ERSHXP DUES 141~2 4Solo
33 BASELZ~ TRUE VALUE Hi.MARE ~ZNTENAKE S~PLZES
6142 BASSRTT-SNZTHe TERRZ RECREATION RE~ND ~4~N4 ZSo4Z
5T91 BELETTOe NANCY XNSTR~TO8 PAYMENT ZAINS 3650&O
3863 BOPROe CfiIZSTOPHER ESRZ USER NEETING lAIN6 300.00
4699 BOlDNERo HAHGEE ZNSTR~T~ PUT 141N7 420000
5525 BOMERVB RODlET R~PUN~BUSXNESS RELATEO EXPo 14!NI 60.00
2209 BR~Eo XNGRXD SCAG MEETING
~166 ~MICK OEER CRE~ L~ES ZNSTR~T~ PAVNENT ~4~0 ~36.80
SSgX BURCHFIELO~ OARHELL ZNST~TOR PATIENT 141911 189.00
S52 BURK-BLACKSCHLEGER~ ROSEANN ZNSTR~TOR PHT
6291 C&RNEVe HICHAEL HPOSZT REFUND
21351 CATTEAC CONSTR~TX~o INC. OVERPAYHINT ON PERHITS 14~4 5000
1061 CHAHPZ~ AMAROS & ~ECXALXTZES ENGRAVED PLAG~
949 CLARKo KAREN XNSTR~TOR PAYBENT ~4~6 264000
Z4TO COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE ~ZNTENAKE SUPPLIES X41~T 19023
S407 COHBXN~ MARTIAL SCIENCE XNSTR~T~ PAYMENT
~88 DA~.~EVIRXAN, KATHY ZNSTR~Tfi PAYMENT 1141~0 408000
4544 DZCKB ~RXC EMPLOYEE ~ THE MONTH J 141~ZZ TS.00
2379 OUFPVe MARK ZNSTR~T~ PAYMENT ~4~2 484.00
3&636 EHLENI~Go dACKXE RECREATX~ RE~ND ~41~24 ESS. 00
SZAZ EVANS ~ORTZNG GOODS RECREATION SUrfLEES
41000 FAVELAo RXCHARDO REIMBURSEMENT
724 FLORZOo JOAN XNSTR~T~ PAYMENT ~41~8 11J.40
3178 FONLERo HARK ZNSTRUCTOt PAYMENT ~41~29 1,6ZZ.00
SJOZ GZOROAN0 HAIXANNA INSVICTOR PAYHINT
1245 GONSALVES & BONo JOB Ao LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
S3~2 GOOOHEARTo PAULA ZNSTR~TOR PAYRENT 14~934 T06. SO
93 GOVERNHINT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. REGISTRATION FEE
All& HALLE JOHNNY RIPUNO HENDR !XCIPTZON PItNIT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LIST OF ¥ARRANTS
FOR PERIOD~ 0T-21-99
RUN DATEI 07/21/99
VENDOR NAME ZTEN OESCRZPTION NARD NO NANO. ANT.
~ CHECKS OVERLAP
2855 HAVEN ¥INE & LIQUOR CO. SUI-CONHZTTEE NEETINGS
))34 HEILZGo KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
S460 HZOALGOo CARLO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141~43 240000
6Z93 HIMSON, KATHY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
ZiIZ HOYTt I~AYNONO INSTRUCTOR PATNENT 141946 1,O2e.40
5112 Z C M A REXTREMONT TRUST - 405 OJ
103 X C # A RETIREMENT TRUST-45Y DEFERRED CDNP
6208 XCKESo SCOTT RECREATION REFUNO 'I42~49 229oe0
4247 ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY REZHIUBSENENT/GIFT CERTIFICATE
6ZeZ INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
3905 JOHNSONo CHEABXCE REZNBURSEI~NT ~41952 ZIG.GO
4700 JONES~ KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAT#ENT
4329 KZNGo PATRICK INSTRUCTOR PAYHINT 1414U4 ~94o00
6090 KONGo SOPHAK BI~SXNBSS LICENSE REFUNO 141915 360000
172 KOZLOVXCHo DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 8 141916 IogTSeSO
6285 KUHN, CHUCK RECREATION REFUND 141~ST 1o10~000
S216 LAD ROSAS- EMMA SORCXNI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141958 148020
197 LEAGUE Of CALIFORNXA CITIES ANNUAL DUES 141~59 2ToSO
367 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES FINANCIAL HG#To NEETING
S490 LIST, ERICH CASH ADVANCE 141961 260.00
5274 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS GRAPHIC DESIGNER 14~62
S313 LOYEo NARZAANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
)1450 MACRO PRO PROFESSZNAL SERVICE 141~64 90012
4YOI MARSHALLB SYLVIA RECREATION REFUNO 141965 46~064
2191 MICHAELS STORES INC, 83019 RECREATION SUPPLIES
744 NATIONAL OEPERRED OEFERREO COMP 141~67 Z,ZAO.OO
6269 OLDONe LENNART CONTRACT SERVICES
SIT OLYMPIC STUDIOS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
ZSZ ONNXTEANS BUS PASSES 145970 STZ.00
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER XNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT 141~71 S56e80
3662 PAC#ONo ANORE¥ REINSURSENENToSUPPLIES 141972 90000
3682 PACNONo ANDRE¥ REI~tBURSENENT-SUFPLIES 141973 lSZo00
6287 PACIFICARE Of CALIFORNIA RECREATION REFUND laitY4 300974o40
60E9 PITTSo LISA RECREATION REFUND 141~75 190000
30936 POTTORo NELISSA RECREATION 141976 44.33
4335 PUBLXC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CAD 2NO QUARTER PREHIUN DEPOSIT S4I~7T Z,OZT.00
264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 8
4131 RA#O)o GIL SERVICE 143~79 300.00
TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP NEETING 141900 SOoO0
6292 REINHAROTo RITA RECREATION REFUND 141901 704.00
5634 SENNo CINDY INSTRUCTOR PAYHINT 141~2 !4To60
4253 SHALXMAB TOURS & CHARTER RECREATION TRIP 141913 lOBSO
1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ·
S491 SPEKo CNBISTOPHEB CASH ADVANCE 141913 300oO0
ZTIB Y8tRVo OONNA ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141994 ISO.00
)065 TERRVo DONNA ENTEBTAZILqENT ~ASFIS 230040
~$~) TOODo SYLVIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 141996 ~SS.00
CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LZST Off NARRANT$
FOR PERZOO: 07-22-99 C99/00)
RUN OATEZ
VENDOR NAHE ZTEN DESCRZPTXON WARE NO WARR. AHT.
~0~ CHECKE OVERLAP
11453 TO#N & COUNTRY HOTEL RESERVATZONS 14!~i OI.3S
~X453 TOWN & COUNTRY HOTEL RESERVATZONS 14199'9 393.38
11453 TOYN & COUNTRY HOTEL RESERVATXONS 14ZOO0 393.3E
114S3 TOWN L COUNTRY HOTEL RESERVATZONS Z4200Z S~007
124S3 TOWN & COUNTRY HOTEL RESERVATXONS I ~4Z002 SVO.OT
Z958 UHPS ARE US A$SOCXATXON UPiP $ERVXCES · 142003
4206 UNXDUE CREATXONS XST AXD KZT$ E 14Z004 334077
4606 UPLAND TENNX$ CLUE XNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 142005
11705 WHALEN~ORTEGAo XEHAROSE RECEEATZON REPUNDS Z4ZG06 ESoO0
6ZI3 ZOLEZZO, NXCKET ROCHESTER/LARK DR RXGHT-OIr~WAY 14ZOOT 400°00
· ~ TOTAL 102,$TZ.33
DROPPING PARTNER
YES_~ NO'X
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE{S)
TO:
Department of Alcoholic BeYerage Control File Number ..............3552?0
373? Main St., Suite 900 Receipt Number .........1240346
Riverside, CA 92501 Geographical Code ........351
{909} 782-~00 Copies Mailed Date 6/28/99
Issued Date
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business: EL TARASCO MARKET
Location of Business:
Number and Street 8161 W FOOTHILL BLVD
City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
County SAN BERNARDINO
Is premise inside city limits? Y E S
Mailing Address:
(If different from 2246 FLEETWOOD PL
promise address) POMONA CA 91767
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
Lio.n . ....... ................ ....
RE~LACEMEN~ LZ CRN~ S~CTZON 2383.7. $
1. 20 OFF-SALE BEF~R AND ORIGINAL NA YES 0 28-JUN-1999 $100.00 :
2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 28-o--0N-1999 $00.00 :
3. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO I 28-JUN-1999 $39.00 :
TOTAL $139.00
,, II ,,
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Depadment pertaining to the Act? N O
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale lioensed premise will have all the qualifications of a license&, and (b) that he
will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
I IIII I!11!1!~111I I I I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date JUN 28,1999
Under p?nalty of .padury, eaetm pemon. whoe.e signature &picara below, oel~ifiee end ~ays: (1} He is an aolmiicant, or one of the alulOltcants, or an executive officer of the
c~,r~ican! ~e~q::~o~o.n,. nam~ in.t~e ro. regotng al~licalion, dun e .u.thedznd to _re. eke t111~ al~lication on its belmatl': (.2) !hat he haa read the foregoing and knows the
ents t oreo an~ that earn o~ me euovo ststomonto therein meoe -,re true; (3) that rio {}&men other than the aOlmucant or aiW311oalmts nee am/direct or indirect interest
in the apo~lCalmt pr epa#oant's bumi.nem~ to be condu~ecl under the #cent&{s) for which thle ai~loation is made; (4) that me transfer aloi~ltcatton or Immpo~ed transfer is
v~tthmeoe_ M aetle~ the payment ot & ..k~n. or to .fulfill an eg .rein&hi en .t.~. Into more than ninety (90) days prece~ng the day on which the transfer a101~llcation is filled
t .i~e o...e~.m/le~. or .~ gain or eat~bil~m e Iratel&renee to or ror am/o...r~ .~. or transferor_or to defraud or InNre an~ creditor of tmmm'eror, (5) that the transfer el:~iication
may oe w~ln~rewn oy emmet the applicant or the license& with no re~umng IlabilWy to the eelMimic&hr.
c.~ .---- Applicant Signature(s)
Ap,plicant Name(s)
AGUlLAR GERAR,D0 NORTA /-..~ ~ ~-/ ~, ,,,
SUPPLEMENTAL APP; FEES FROM W~~TO BE CARRIED OVER. (~OLLECTED ADD{TIONAL$100 ADMIN
FEE AND $39,00 FOR SFP.
ABC 211 (4/98) /~
SAN BER~RDINO
~te-~r~ BI~.
~ Hill Estates ~b ~. g Tract No. ESEI ~B 36~38 ~m~rs S~n in Giml~.
Application: Type 20 (Off sale Beer and Wine)
Applicant: Aguilar, Gerardo Horta; Hernandez, Jorge Cueliar.
Address: 8161 West Foothill Blvd.
Description: Existing business; adding/deleting applicants
Site and Surrounding Zoning:
Site: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial
North: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea I, Office
South: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial and Office
East: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea t, Specialty Commercial
West: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea I, Specialty Commercial and Office
/7
cAtt~o.~tn DROPPING PARTNER
YES ..... NO_.L,£(
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 353674
3737 Main St.. Suite 900 Receipt Number ......... 1233453
Riverside. CA 92501 Geographical Code ........ 3615
(909) 782-4400 Copies Mailed Date 5-11-99
Issued Date
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: R I V E R $ I D E
Name of Business: TACO FACTORY
Location of Business'
Number and Street 9799 BASELINE A
City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
County SAN BERNARDINO
Is premise inside city limits? YES
Mailing Address:
(If different from 21272 WASHINGTON BLVD
premise address) WALNUT CA 91789
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transfero. r's names/license: GUILLEN RAQUEL 232619
License ~/'~e Transaction ~ffDe Fee Type Master DUD Date Fee
1. 41 ON-SALE BEEt A/qD W PERSON TO PERSON TRA/WS NA YES 0 MAY 11,1999 $150.00 :
2. 41 ON-SALE BEEF AND W Alq~UAL FEE NA YES 0 MAY 11,1999 $205.00 :
3. 41 ON-SALE BEEt A3~D W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO 2 MAY 11,1999 $78.00
TOTAL $433
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of th~'""Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? N O Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? N O
Explain an,v "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a
licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF c'ALIFORNIA ........... County of SAN BERNARDINO Date MAY 11,1999
Under penahy of perjury, each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive
officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: 12) that he has read the
foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or
apphcants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application
made: {4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or ~o fulfill an agreement entered into more
than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any
creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or
the licensee with no resulting liabilhy to the Department.
Applicant Name(s) Applicant. Signature(s)
KGLINC George GUILLEN Jr. / Secretary
Jr / Vice President
George GUILLEN . ~ %.,~_., . ~ ...
231 Attached, 227 to £ollow
^i~c 2~1 (,u98) CHICAGO TITLE C0b~ANY
974 %'~ Foothill Blvd /
Upland, CA 91786
Property Information Utility Page 1 of 1
Cursor will: ® Zoom In O Select Property
Application: Type 41 (On Sale Beer and Wine - Eating Place)
Applicant: KGL Inc.
Address: 9799 Basline A
Description: Existing business; transfer of license; new owner
$~te and Surroundlne Zontn~:
Site: Neighborhood Commercial
North: Neighborhood Commercial
South: Neighborhood Commercial
East: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units acre)
West: Neighborhood Commercial
.../esrimap.dll?NAME=Par I &Cmd=Out&Left=6684801.73536054&Bottom= 1866337.97661939 6/2/99
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
CONSIDERATION OF "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND
TAXPAYERS SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE
Recommendation
Approve the attached Resolution in support of "The Fair Competition and
Taxpayers Savings Act" Initiative.
Background
Taxpayers tbr Fair Competition submitted the attached information to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for their consideration. This organization is made up of
independent Engineers and Architects.
As indicated in the attached information submitted by Taxpayers for Fair
Competition, the City of Rancho Cucamonga last spring voted to oppose
Proposition. 224 which would have prevented State and local governments from
contracting out with qualified private Engineers and Architects.
Although Proposition 224 was defeated by the voters of California, Caltrans
employees challenged Proposition 224 in the courts and won. The California State
Supreme Court ruled that the State government was essentially banned from
contracting out for design services. The Taxpayers forFair Competition strongly
believes - and many other entities (listed in attached information) believe also -
that local governments could be next to be banned from contracting out for design
services.
The Taxpayers for .Fair Competition's goal relative to the attached Initiative is to
ensure State and local government's ability to contract out for design services,
giving these entities the flexibility and control necessary to deliver projects on
budget and on time.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Taxpayers Savings Act
August 4, 1999
Page Two
Analysis
The Initiative and its two companion pieces of legislation, AB 1448 and ACA 16
(Assemblyman Cox authored both) would establish the unambiguous authority for
the Stme of California and local governments to obtain professional architectural
and engineering services by contract. The effort behind the Initiative is to ensure
that if the legislation (AB 1448 and ACA 16) does not pass, the Initiative will with
the same provisions as is in AB 1448 and ACA 16.
AB 1448 creates the necessary statutory provisions that compliment existing law to
ensure a fair and competitive selection process and prohibit fraudulent
procurement practices. ACA 16 amends the Constitution to establish that,
notwithstanding the creation of the civil service system, the State, counties and
cities have the right to contract for architectural and engineering services.
Assemblyman Cox has also provided information on AB 1448 and ACA 16, and it
is attached for the City Council's review. The City has sent letters of support for
AB 1448 m~d ACA 16 which are both currently in the Assembly Rules Committee.
It is recommended the City Council approve the attached Resolution No. 99'**
Diane O'Neal
Assistant To The City Manager
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 1 7 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
SUPPORT OF "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER
SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE
WHEREAS, Catifornia's population growth has resulted in the demand for more than
$90 billion worth of highway, school, prison, flood control and other infrastructure improvement
projects; and
WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract with the private
sector for architectural and engineering services has never been greater; and
WHEREAS, a series of successful lawsuits by the bureaucrats at CalTrans has
resulted in effectively banning the state from contracting with private engineers and architects; and
WHEREAS, a recent study by the California Business Roundtable has determined
the CalTrans lawsuits will create a $3 billion backlog of highway and bridge projects alone; and
WHEREAS, in order to stop the CalTrans bureaucrats' continuing efforts to prevent
the state and local government from utilizing pdvate engineers and architects, an initiative and
legislation known as "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act changes California's
laws and allows the state and local governments to contract with private companies for architectural
and engineering services; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act will save California's
taxpayers money by encouraging competition between state employees and the private sector; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act requires architecture
and engineering contracts to be subject to standard accounting practices and requires financial and
performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed
schedule and budget.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga SUPPORTS "The Fair Competition and Taxpayers Savings Act" Initiative.
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 1 7 ~)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
SUPPORT OF "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER
SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE
WHEREAS, California's population growth has resulted in the demand for more than
$90 billion worth of highway, school, prison, flood control and other infrastructure improvement
projects; and
WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract with the private
sector for architectural and engineering services has never been greater; and
WHEREAS, a series of successful lawsuits by the bureaucrats at CalTrans has
resulted in effectively banning the state from contracting with private engineers and architects; and
WHEREAS, a recent study by the California Business Roundtable has determined
the CalTrans lawsuits will create a $3 billion backlog of highway and bridge projects alone; and
WHEREAS, in order to stop the CalTrans bureaucrats' continuing efforts to prevent
the state and local government from utilizing private engineers and architects, an initiative and
legislation known as "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act changes California's
laws and allows the state and local governments to contract with private companies for architectural
and engineering services; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act will save California's
taxpayers money by encouraging competition between state employees and the private sector; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act requires architecture
and engineering contracts to be subject to standard accounting practices and requires financial and
performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed
schedule and budget.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga SUPPORTS "The Fair Competition and Taxpayers Savings Act" Initiative.
r~ 111 Anza Boulevard, #406 · Burlingame, CA 940~0 tI~-
· 13S0-340-0470 · F~: 6S0-340-1740 ~
~ 11~00 W. O'~mpio Boulevard, ~0 · Loe Angela ~0~~/'
Ci~ Manager J U ~.J $ ;. ';,.~ ~~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center ' ............ ~
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr.. Lam:
Last spring the Rancho Cucamonga City Council voted to oppose Proposition
224, which would have prevented state and local governments from contracting
out with qualified private engineers and architects. Fortunately, Prop. 224 was
soundly defeated by the voters of California.
Unfortunately, the same people who brought us Prop. 224 are at it again. While
we were defeating Prop. 224, the same group of Caltrans employees was also
pursuing their agenda in the courts. The bad news is they won - the California
Supreme Court agreed with their interpretation of the constitution. This means
that state government is essentially banned from contracting out for design
services And make no mistake about it -- local governments could be next.
In the past, cities, counties and special districts, as well as local and regional
agencies, have relied on private design firms to help meet their infrastructure
needs. Your ability to contract out for.these services has already been impacted
by the state ban. It's only a matter of time before additional lawsuits will attempt
- and could well succeed - in extending that ban to local governments. In fact,
the state employees' lawsuit has already resulted in the City of San Diego
and East Bay MUD canceling contracts with local firms.
If this ban is allowed to remain in place, it will essentially take control over your
local projects and give it to the state. You lose the ability to decide when,
where and how to complete a project.
Losing the ability to contract out also means completion of local infrastructure
projects will slow to a crawl. If a~l design work must be done by the state, a
huge bottleneck will develop, stalling local projects for an indefinite amount of
time. According to the California Business Roundtable, there will be a $3 billion
backlog of transportation projects by the end of 1999 alone. Unfortunately, that's
just the beginning.
Further, as all design work shifts to the state, California's government will be forced to
support a ballooning permanent workforce. As more and more scarce taxpayer funds
are siphoned off to this purpose, it will mean either fewer dollars for vital local projects
or increased taxpayer costs - just one more way for Sacramento to take funds away
from local government.
That is why we are asking for your City Council's support of the Fair Competition
and Taxpayer Savinels Act. It expressly allows state and local governments to
contract out for design services, giving you the flexibility and control necessary to
deliver projects on budget and on time.
Currently we are gathering signatures to place this initiative on the March 2000 ballot.
In the meantime, we are also pursuing a legislative remedy. The legislation (AB 1448
and ACA 16), which has already been introduced, contains the same language as the
initiative. We are working to pass the legislation but prepared to go the initiative route if
necessary.
We would like your City Council to support both the legislation and the initiative. I hope
that once you have reviewed the enclosed materials you will agree that our solution
allows California and its taxpayers the best opportunity to improve our infrastructure
needs. Please sign and return to me the enclosed support form or sample
resolution so I can add your city council to our growing coalition.
I will be calling to follow-up on this letter. In the meantime, if you have any questions,
please feet free to call me at (650) 340-0470.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely~_~~
Jason Barnett
· gCT'lW/Nzr~rjZrJ TO Protect Ability Of Local
Governments Te eeutrnct Out For
Arcbltecturnl & Engineering Services
Historically, local government has been free to rely on
private design firms as a cost-effective way to speed
WHY the delivery of transportation, school, water, earthquake
& AGEUCIES SHOULD retrofitting and other infrastructure projects.
SUPPORT
THE"MR 06MPtTITION A series of lawsuits brought by state employees (primarily
ANiU ~PAYER Caltrans engineers) however, has effectively banned Califor-
nia State government from contracting with qualified private
engineers and architects. This has also begun to limit the
ability of local government to choose where and when to use
private firms, putting many important local projects in jeop-
ardy. But that's not all. Without action, the ability of local
governments to contract for these services could be com-
pletely taken away.
The Ban On State Contracting PutsThe Existing Ban Gives Sacramento
Local Transportation One Mere Way To Take Fnnds Away
,,, PrajectslnJespardvFrom Local Governments
The design work on all Caltrans If this ban on contracting remains
projects will now have to be done in place, state government will be
by Caltrans employees. Accord- forced to support a ballooning
ing to the California Business "Make no mistake about it. The permanent workforce. As more
Roundtable, this situation will ability of local government to and more scarce taxpayer funds
create a $3 billion backlog of control local projects is very much are siphoned off to support an
important highway and bridge at stake ~we don't take action." increased state payroll, it will
projects by the end of 1999 Rob Sa~ber, mean either fewer dollars for vital
alone. Former Oh[on City Councilmemberprojects at the local level, or
Failure to deliver on existing I increased taxpayer costs.
projects will make it more difficult
in the future to find funding for new projects.IThis Situation Is Only Going Te Get
Worse For Local Governments
Can No Loinget Be Utilized it'sonly a matter of time before additional lawsuits
will attempt - and could well succeed - in officially
extending this ban beyond state government to Io-
Even though critical projects may need specific cal and regional governments and agencies as well.
expertise available only in the private sector, these
In fact, the state employees' lawsuit has already
lawsuits have precluded their use. More than 20
resulted in the City of San Diego and East Bay MUD
contracts for seismic retrofit work have already canceling contracts with private firms.
been canceled.
Taxpayers for Fair Competition
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 . Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 - Fax: (650) 340-1740
11300 W, Olympic Boulevard1 ¢¢840 · Los Angeles, CA 90064 · (310) 996-2600 · Fax: (310) 996-2673
[3 111 Anza Boulevard, #406 · Burlin~,arne, 0A 94010
· 6S0-340-0470 · FAX: 650-340-1740
[] 11300 W. 01~jmpie Boulevard, #840 · Los An~[eles, CA 90064
· 310-996-2600 · FAX: 310-996-2673 *~-,*
WHO SUPPORTS "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT"?
Legislation and Initiative I~ of 5/26/99)
Alliance of California Taxpayers and Involved Voters
Associated General Contractors of California*
Bay Area Council
Bay Counties Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors Association
Butte County Citizens for Better Government
California Building Industry Association
California Business Roundtable *
California Cement Promotion Council
California Chamber of Commerce
California Chapter, American Planning Association
California Fence Contractors Association
California Manufacturers Association *
California Minority and Women's Businesses Coalition
California Taxpayers' Association *
California Travel Parks Association
City of Cotaft
City of Orland
Gary Monihan, Mayor of Costa Mesa
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California
Contra Costa Taxpayers Association
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Engineering and Utility Contractors Association
Kern County Taxpayers Association
Metropolitan Transportation Commission*
National Federation of Independent Business
Orange County Taxpayers Association*
Orange County Business Council
Orange County Transportation Coalition
Responsible Voters for Lower Taxes
San Diego County Taxpayers Association
Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association
Shasta County Taxpayers Association
Sonoma County Taxpayers Association
Waste Watchers
Western States Petroleum Association
* Legislation only at this time.
The Fair Competition and
Taxpayer Savings Initiative
for Architectural and Engineering Service
1. Permits Contracting Out of Architectural and Engineering Services:
Allows state and local governments, special districts and school districts to contract with
private companies for architectural and engineering services. Defines such services as
architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land surveying and
construction management.
2. Local Choice to Deliver Transportation Projects On-Time:
Gives local governments greater control over transportation improvements so that
highway, bridge and transit projects can be delivered on-time and within budget.
3. Taxpayer Safeguards:
· Prohibits government employees from awarding contracts if they have a
financial or business relationship with the companies involved.
· Requires compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts
of interest or unlawful activities.
· Subjects all architecture and engineering contracts to standard accounting
practices.
· Permits financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract
services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget.
4. Strict Design and Construction standards:
Already established project seismic safety, project design and construction standards are
not changed by the initiative.
5. Only Applies to Architectural and Engineering Services:
This measure does not apply to any other contracts except for architecture and
engineering services. For example, it does not apply to peace officers, teachers or
correction officers
5/17/1999 Taxpayers for Fair Competition
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 · Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 - Fax: (650) 340-1740 C:~ 7
11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, ¢¢840 · Los Angeles, CA 90064 · (310) 996-2600 · Fax: (310) 996-2673
FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS INITIATIVE
SECTION 1. TITLE. This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "Fair
Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act."
SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT.
It is the intent of the people of the State of California in enacting this measure:
(a) To remove existing restrictions on contracting for architectural and
engineering services and to allow state, regional and local governments to
use qualified private architectural and engineering firms to help deliver
transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other infrastructure
projects safely, cost effectively and on time;
(b) To encourage the kind of public/private parmerships necessary to ensure
that California taxpayers benefit from the use of private sector experts to
deliver transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other
infrastructure projects;
(c) To promote fair competition so that both public and private sector architects
and engineers work smarter, more efficiently and ultimately deliver better
value to taxpayers;
(d) To speed the completion of a multi-billion dollar backlog of highway,
bridge, transit and other projects;
(e) To ensure that contracting for architectural and engineering services occurs
through a fair, competitive selection process, free of undue political
influence, to obtain the best quality and value for California taxpayers; and
(f) To ensure that private frans contracting for architectural and engineering
services with governmental entities meet established design and
conslruction standards and comply with standard accounting practices and
permit financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract
services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget.
SECTION 3. Article XXII is hereby added to the California Constitution to read:
§ 1. The State of California and all other governmental entities, including, but
not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other
special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, shall
be allowed to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and
engineering services for all public works of improvement. The choice and
authority to contract shall extend to all phases of project development
including permitting and environmental studies, rights-of-way services,
design phase services and construction phase services. The choice and
authority shall exist without regard to funding sources whether federal,
ooo
state, regional, local or private, whether or not the project is programmed by
-a state, regional or local governmental entity, and whether or not the
completed project is a pan of any State owned or State operated system or
facility.
§ 2. Nothing contained in Article VII of this Constitution shall be construed to
limit, restrict or prohibit the State or any other governmental entities,
including, but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school
districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint
power agencies, from contracting with private entities for the performance
of architectural and engineering services.
SECTION 4. Chapter 10.1 is hereby added to Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code
to read:
§ 4529.10. For purposes of Article XXII of the California Constitution and this
act, the term "architectural and engineering services" shall include all
architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land
surveying, and construction project management services.
§ 4529.11. All projects included in the State Transportation Improvement
Program programmed and funded as interregional improvements or as
regional improvements shall be subject to Article XXII of the California
Constitution. The sponsoring governmental entity shall have the choice
and the authority to contract with qualified private entities for
architectural and engineering services. For projects programmed and
funded as regional improvements, the sponsoring govemmentaI entity
shall be the regional or local project sponsor. For projects programmed
and funded as interregional improvements, the sponsoring governmental
entity shall be the State of California, unless there is a regional or local
project sponsor, in which case the sponsoring governmental entity shall
be the regional or local project sponsor. The regional or local project
sponsor shall be a regional or local governmental entity.
§ 4529.12. All architectural and engineering services shall be procured
pursuant to a fair, competitive selection process which prohibits
governmental agency employees from participating in the selection
process when they have a financial or business relationship with any
private entity seeking the contract, and the procedure shall require
compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of
interest or unlawful activities.
§ 4529.13. Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to change project
design standards, seismic safety standards or project construction
standards established by state, regional or local governmental entities.
.~ Nor shall any provision of this act be construed to prohibit or restrict the
0002
authority of the Legislature to statutorily provide different procurement
methods for design-build projects or design-build-and-operate projects.
§ 4529.14. Architectural and engineering services contracts procured by public
agencies shall be subject to standard accounting practices and may
require financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract
services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget.
§ 4529.15. This act only applies to architectural and engineering services
defined in Government Code section 4529.10. Nothing contained in
this act shall be construed to expand or restrict the authority of
governmental entities to contract for fire, ambulance, police, sheriff,
probation, corrections or other peace officer services. Nor shall
anything in this act be construed to expand or restrict the authority of
governmental entities to contract for education services including but
not limited to, teaching services, services of classified school personnel
and school administrators.
§ 4529.16. This act shall not be applied in a manner that will result in the loss
of federal funding to any governmental entity.
§ 4529.17. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act
or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application.
§ 4529.18. If any act of the Legislature conflicts with the provisions of this act,
this act shall prevail.
§ 4529.19. This act shall be liberally construed to accomplish its purposes.
§ 4529.20. This act seeks to comprehensively regulate the matters which are
contained within its provisions. These are matters of statewide concern
and when enacted are intended to apply to charter cities as well as all
other governmental entities.
SECTION 5. This initiative may be amended to further its purposes by statute, passed in each
house by roll call vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership
concurring, and signed by the Governor.
SECTION 6. If there is a conflicting initiative measure on the same ballot, which addresses
and seeks to comprehensively regulate the same subject, only the provisions of
this measure shall become operative if this measure receives the highest
affirmative vote.
ooo
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 12, 1999
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE--1999--2000 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1448
Introduced by Assembly Member Cox
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Campbell, Leach, and
Oller)
(Coauthor: Senator Johannessen)
February 26, 1999
An act to add Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section
4529.61) to'Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code,
relating to public contracts.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1448, as amended, Cox. Public contracts: architectural
and engineering services.
The California Constitution provides that the civil service
includes every officer and employee of the state, subject to
specified exceptions. Statutory provisions govern contracting
by state and local agencies for architectural, landscape
architectural, engineering, land surveying,
and construction project
This bill would enact '' to impl~raent a
proposed amendment to Constitutioet related
to public contracting for and. emgineermg
services. ?
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school distri¢la for certain costs mandated
by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedm'es for
98
3 AB 1448
1 which case the sponsoring governmental entity is shall be
2 the regio_nal or local project sponsor. The regional or local
3 project sponsor is :he shall be a regional or local
4 governmental ~-': .........
23 4529.63. All ~chitect~al and engineering seroices
..... a ..... u~. fai<
24 shall be procured pursuit to a
25 c~mpetitive selection process which prohibits
26 governmental agency employ~s from p~icipating in
27 the s~lection process ~ when they have a fin~ci~ or
28 business mlarions~p wi~ the any pfivat~ en6ty s~e~ng
29 the con~az:. ~c coreract, and the proced~e sh~l
30 requ~ compli~ce wi~ ~ ~ws mg~g political
31 con~ibu6ons, conflicts of imems~ or uffiaw~l accedes.
32
33 d529.6~. Nothing t~ c~pter ~ll be
34 construed to s~~, ~is~c
35 safety smd~s
36 established by l~al gove~em~.
37 entities. ~ll any p~iMon o~
38 this chapmr be pro,bit or ~s~ct ~e '
39 authority of ~e ~gis~:~ Eo~' ..... :" ........ ='" ~--
40 stamto~ly provide different proc~ement me~s for
98
5 AB 1448
I 4529. 71. This chapter seeks to comprehensively
2 regulate the matters which are contained within its
3 provisions. These are matters of statewide concern and
4 ~.:~ ~. ..... :c ...... .~ is when enacted are intended to
5 apply to charter cities as well as all other governmental
6 entities.
7 SEC. 2. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the
8 Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandates
9 determines that this act contains costs mandated by the
l0 state, reimbursement to local agencies and school
11 districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7
12 (conunencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of TitIe
13 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the
14 claim for reimbursement does not exceed one million
15 dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from
16 the State Mandates Claims Fund.
O
98
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE--1999-2000 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 16
Introduced by Assembly Member Cox
March 3, 1999
Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 16 A resolution
to propose to the people of the State of California an
amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Article
XXII thereof, relating to public contracts.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
ACA 16, as introduced, Cox. Public contracts:
architectural and engineering services.
The California Constitution provides that the civil service
includes every officer and employee of the state, subject to
specified exceptions. Statutory provisions govern contracting
by state and local agencies for architectural, landscape
architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying,
and construction project management services.
This measure would provide that the state and all other
governmental entities are permitted to contract with private
entities for architectural and sexvices for
public works of improvement, to funding
source, whether the project is
entities, or whether the project is a:~ state-owned
state-operated system or facility.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. committe~:: yes.~
State-mandated local program: no.
3 ACA 16
1 PUBLIC CONTRACTS
2
3 SECTION 1. This article shall be known as the "Fair
4 Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act."
5 SEC. 2. The State of California and all other public
6 entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties,
7 cities and counties, special districts, local and regional
8 'agencies, and joint powers agencies, may contract with
9 private entities for architectural and engineering services
10 for all public-works of improvement. The choice and
11 authority to contract extends to all phases of project
I2 development, including permit and environmental
13 studies, rights-of-way services, design phase services, and
14 construction phase services. The choice and authority to
15 contract exist without regard to funding source, whether
16 federal, State, regional, local, or private, whether or not
17 the project is programmed by a State, regional, or local
18 government entity, or whether or not the completed
19 project is a part of any state-owned or state-operated
20 system or facility.
21 SEC. 3. Article VII may not be construed to restrict
22 or prohibit the State or any other public entities,
23 ir~cluding, but not lirhited to, cities, counties, cities and
24 counties, special districts, local and regional agencies, and
25 joint power agencies, from contracting with private
26 entities for the performance of architectural or
27 engineering services.
28 SEC. 4. Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section
29 4529.61) of Division 5 of Title 2 of the Government Code,
30 or any successor, may be amended only by a bill .that
31 furthers the purposes of this measure and is passed in each
32 house of the Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the
33 journal, two-thirds of the membership coacarring.
0
111 Anza Boulevard, #406 · Burlingtame, CA 94010
· 6S0-340-0470 · FAX: 6S0-340-1740
11300 W. Okjmpio Boulevard, #840 · Los Anaeles, CA 90064
· 310-996-2600 · FAX:310-996-2673 ,~-,-
Support Form
! / We support the Taxpayers for Fair Competition legislation and initia-
tive allowing state and local governments to hire private architectural
and engineering firms to help build important infrastructure for
transportation, schools, prisons and water proiects.
You may add my/our name to your coalition list.
Organization Name Date
Authorized Signature Printed Name
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip
Phone FAX
E-Mail Address
Please FAX completed form to Jason Barnett at (650) 340-1 740
THANK YOU!
Taxpayers for Fair Competition
4/14/99 - Both
SAMPLE RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF "THE FAIR COMPETITION
AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION
WHEREAS, California's population growth has resulted in the demand for more than $90
billion worth of highway, school, prison, flood control and other infrastructure improvement projects;
and
WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract with the private sector for
architectural and engineering services has never been greater; and
WHEREAS, a series of successful lawsuits by the bureaucrats at Caltrans has resulted in
effectively banning the state from contracting with private engineers and architects; and
WHEREAS, a recent study by the California Business Roundtable has determined the Caltrans
lawsuits will create a $3 billion backlog of highway and bridge projects alone; and
WHEREAS, in order to stop the Caltrans bureaucrats' continuing effort to prevent the state and
local government from utilizing private engineers and architects, an initiative and legislation known as
"The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act changes California's laws and
allows the state and local governments to contract with private companies for architectural and
engineering services; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act will save Cali£ornia's taxpayers
money by encouraging competition between state employees and the private sector; and
WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act requires architecture and
engineering contracts to be subject to standard accounting practices and requires financial and
performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and
budget;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,
SLIPPORTS "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" for architectural and engineering
services as an initiative and legislation.
Contact
Title
City State Zip
Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail address
Please fax completed form to 650-340-1740. Questions? Call 650/340-0470 or 310/996-2600.
Taxpayers for Fair Competition
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 · Burlingame1 CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 · Fax: (650) 340-1740
11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 · Los Angeles, CA 90064 · (310) 996-2600 · Fax: (310) 996-2673
The Office of
Assemblyman Dave Cox /,
State Capitol
Sacramento, California
FAX COVER SHEET
COMMENTS:
NUMBER OF' PA~3ES (INCLUDIN~, COVE'R SHEET) ,
]J the traz,,~m[ss~n is incomplete, :please ~ re appmprb. te office a.s ]bred below.
CAPITOL OFFICE [-] DISTRICT OFFICE
State Capitol ~811 Chippendale Drive
P.O. Box 942849 Sui~ 501
Sacramento, CA. 94249-0001 Sacramento, CA 95841
PHONE: (916) 319-200S PHONI~:'~I. 6) 349-1995
FAX: (916) 319-2105 FAX: (916) 349-1999
The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act
for 4rchitectura! and Engineering Services
Public/Private Partnerships
Thc need for state and local governments to
contract with the private sector for
architectural and engineering services has
never been greater. California's population I Permits Contraes'tag With Private
growth has resulted in an increased demand Architectural and Engineering Firms:
for more than $90 billion worth of highway, Allows the state and local governments to
school, prison, flood control and other contract with qualified private architectural
h~frastructure improvement projects. and engineering companies to help meet the
growing backlog of important infrastructure
Taxpayer Savin~ improvement projects.
Using private architectural and engineering
companies is a cost-effective way to meet I Local Choice to Speed Up Highway
these needs. It helps keep taxes down because Improvement Projects:
the state doesn't have to maintain a large Coltrans causes costly highway improvement
workforce betwee.,] projects, It makes delays by refusing to let local governments
everyone work smarter and more effic[ently use private engineers when state funds are
by encouraging competition between state invo[ved. The initiative will help complete
..... employees and the private sector. these much needed and overdue projects by
allowing local and regional governments to
Delivers Projects Safely and On Time contract with qualified private companies on
It also enables government to utilize needed regional or local improvements to the state
earthquake safety and other private sector transportation system.
expertise to deliver transportation and other
projects safely and on time. · Taxpayer Safeguards and
Accountability:
The Multi-Billion Dollar Backlog The initiative requires contracts be awarded
Created by Coltrans Bureaucrats through a competitive selection process that:
Tim initiative is needed to overturn a series of * Prohibits the participation of public
lawsuits ,ha{ were brought by a group of employees with a financial interest in a
Col,rang bureaucrats. The lawsuits effectively competing private entity.
banned the state from contracting with private · Requires compliance w[th all laws regarding
engineers and architects. According to the political contributions, conflicts of interest
California Business Roundtable: T!~¢ or unlawful activities.
Cal(ran.s .lawsuit w~!! create. a $3 b!l!_i_qt, · Subjects all architecture and engineering
backloE of__importem_t I~i:~itwaE. _and bridg~ contracts to standard accounting practices.
project$. * Permits financial and performance audits as
necessary to ensure services are delivered
within the agreed schedule and budget.
Taxpayers for Fair Competition
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406, Burlingame, CA 94010
Phone: (650)340-0470 · Fax: (6$0)340.~740
~t3/99
~ Purpose
ACA 16 and AB 1~448 would establish the unambiguous authority for the State of California
and local government to obtain professional architectural and engineering services by
contract, Architectural and engineering (A&E) services includes all architectural, landscape
architecturaI, erlvironmental, engineering, land surveying, and constnlction project
management services.
Background
In I997, the California Supreme Court invalidated the Legislature's previous attempts to
streamline the State's ability to contract for architectural and engineering services
reaffirmed the constitutional monopoly inherent in Article 7 of the California Constitution.
Legislation
ACA 16 amends the Constitution to establish that, notwithstanding the creation of the c/vil
service system, the State, Counties and Cities have the right to contract for A&li services, AB
1448 creates the necessary statutory provisions that compliment existing law to ensure a fair
and competitive selection process and prohibit fraudulent procurement practices
Prior Legislation
SB 516 (Bergeson) Chapter 9 of 1988
SB 1219 (Bergeson, Kopp) Chapter 313 of 1991
SB 805 (Bergeson, Kopp, Kay) Chapter 314 of I99'1
SB 1209 [Bergeson, Katz, Polan¢o, Pringle)/ Chapter 433 of 1993
· """ AB 1958 Kat. z, Archie-Hud.qon, Bowen, Cortese, Dueheny, Chapter ~012 of 1994
Escutia, Terry Friedman, Hauser, Km'nette, Lee, McDonald,
Murray, Napolitano, O'Connell, and Umberg (Senators Alquist,
Hayden, Hughes, Kopp, Rosenthal, Torres, and Wauson.
SB 192 Muddy. Lockyet, Allen, Willie Brown, and Brulte.. Chapter 310 of 1995
SB 1684 Rainey (1998) Not heard
Related Current Legislation
Assembly Bill 502 (Wildman) would make it harder for countie~ to contract for A&E
services. Assembly Bill 688 (Steinberg) would make it harder for the Stat~ to contract for
A&E serx"ices
Some Questions About these Bills
Q'. Why do the bills apply to cities and counties?
A: Some local agencies have been threatened with litigation if they contract with private
firms for A&E services.
Q: Isn't it much more costly to contract with a private firm than using state or local
employees?
A: the University of California. Berkeley, performed the most comprehensive analysis or'
the cost of using a consultant versus "Inhouse Engineering" in 1992, There finding
was that "the study did not find a difference between the cost of doing engineering
2..L-~.;,1-19'3'3 ~.3:5~, AE, SEN£L,'"h'IAN DAUE CC~'~ 9±~, 219
work with outside engineering firms and the cost of doing engineering work with
inhouse forces,"~
Q: But what about the figures pm'portedly from the Legislative Analyst that says it is
twice as costly to contract out,
A: The Analyst has disclaimed this analysis as it is an apples and oranges comparison
lhat does not take into account the total state cost to provide A&E services. This
comparison wa~ prepared by opponents to contracting out who compare just the
salary of a state employee with the contract cost of a consult~mt, The Legislative
Analyst has said this is a comparison that does not take into account the full cost of
using a state employee, It would be like companng the salary of an airline pilot with
the cost of running ,an airline mad deciding it was cheaper to employ the pilot than to
buy a ticket on Southwest Airlines to fly to Los Angeles,
Q: I still don't see why it wouldn't be cheaper to have a big workthree of state engineers,
A: First. when a consultant is finished, the cost.,; a.~sociated with him or her end. If there
i,~ nothing to design - there is no cost. With a full time employee, if there is no project
you either have to lay the person off (a time-consuming process and one that is very
disruptive to the stat¢'s workforce) or you have them perform less-productive work,
The Legislative Analyst and the Department of Finance, when they analyzed the
initiative that mirrors the two bills concluded "...the state would choose to contract
o;tt only in those instances where it was in its interests to do so--for example, to save
money on a project or to get a project dono sooner (even if it cost as much--or
..-. n'lore~to contract ot~t)."2
Q: Why has the Legislature passed so many bills to accomplish this and why do you
iqced one more,
A: The Legislature has recognized the value of being able to use private consultants, as
the authority the sought to provide the state was challenged in ¢;ourt, they tried to
create new authority to satisfy those opponents to competition. The Supreme Court's
decision in 1.997 made it clear that a new constitutional provision was needed,
Q: But isn't there existing authority in state law to do what you propose'?
A: There is authority. Oovernment Code {}19130 et. seq. contains statutory rules for
contracting personal services, The rules are much more restrictive than the judicial
decisions that they purport to implement. Further, the statutes create procedural
impediments that make it difficult to contract for services, As a practical matter, we
are unawar~ of a single contract for A&E services that have been approved pursuant
to § 19130,
Q: How unique is Califomia's almost complete r~liance on state employees?
A: It is very unique, Virtually every state in the union uses a mix of private consultants
and state employees,
,"'" ~ A Cost Comparison of Contracting Out l~r Engineering Services by Culttans Ver.qus lntlou$¢ Enginccnng.
University or'California at Berkeley, June 30, 1992
"I.,¢tt~r dated March 11, 1999 from Elizabeth Hill and Timotl~y Gage to Attorney Gcneral Bill Lockye~'.
q/
,¢~-
State Coveinmont
Meeting California's Infrastructure Challenge:
Assuring (~oet. Effe=tlve and Timely Delivery
By Loren K~e and Richo~ Kreutze.
~ow~g pop~affo~ ~ ~e prosper- ers. ~e ]on~t~ te~ion has re, ted
i~ ~em~ ~e ~ o~ ~s~c~e ~- ~ a complex ~t
v~ent ma~e ~ ~e l~st geaera~on. utes ~d a~a~ve
~at ~s~c~e, much o[ w~ w~ ~e~e what work
b~t sever~ d~c~de~ ago, esta~hed ~e issues have become
fo~da~on for ~ono~c prospe~ d~- bl~ ~ ~e ~el~om be~n labor
~ ~e last ~on. Acco~ to a re- m~a~ement,
cent report by the ~e~islative Analyst, ~ofm~age~to~4n~ways
"(0he state faces a si~Bc~t ~Ilen~e to s~et~ ~ do~a~s.
ove~ the next ~de ~d beyond to ad- N~emus na~on~ s~di~ have sho~
~ssbo~ede~en~esof~a~pu~ ~at con~ac~ out for d~i~ ~d en~-
lic ~as~c~e ~nd ~e n~d ~or new ~- nee~g se~c~ ~ ~dely ~ ~ou~hout
~d pop~a~on." ta~ for proj~ m~ement ~d deEve~,
~e ~a ~ess Ro~dt~ble es- as we~ ~ fo~ acco~tab~
~at~ ~ state's l~ye~ capi~ fa~es ~e studies abe io~d
n~ at mo~ ~ $90 b~on, wi~ pubEc Ha~ of states ~e u~ co~t~ to
s~oo~,~her~u~flon,~d~hwa~s~ accomplish 50 p~rcent or more
~tatest n~ Ca~o~ c~ot tongue pr~o~~
at ~ pace ~nd rema~ ~e Golden State. S~ ~ ~e Iow~t pr~~ ~d
by the Roundtable and the California c~ out ~ to
~r of Co~rce, 76 pe~ent of ~e work
s~te's b~s leadera ~d 80 petit o~ The Department of Transportation
voters am concerned about ~ need for (Cd~)~not~emosteffident~
~d ~bEc ~ves~ent. of ~-ho~ ~d
Momm~not~eo~y~er ~e ~e ~est prel~a~ ~d co~on
~c~re ~c~ ~a~ge. Be~er ~ee~ cos~ of any state - 35 to
~em~t of ~ ~m ~ ~ra~ve petit over ~e 1~ ~ 1989 ~g~, corn-
to j~ ~y ~ ~~ ~'~. ~ p~ wi~ about
me~ ~t~y~~~pa~- o~er
age m~t ~ ~t ~ayem ~ ~ ~e CnI~ shoed promo~ m~a~ed com-
mit ~ly, c~t~w p~ ~g~ pef16on be~en con~cto~ ~d ~-ho~
State ad~s, Governor ~ray Das~ ~- s~ ~t ~ enc~e ~a~rs to
p~ ~~mt ~d a~~n to con~a~ r~o~c~s.
e~ pr~ ~e~ve~. ~stodc~y, Cal~ s~ ~s pl~
~ a 1~ repo~ on ~e s~te's ~vfl set- ~d desi~ s~te ~ways ~d ~ghways;
vice syste~ ~e ~e H~ver Co--sion, pdvate ~ have ~o~ed ~ com~c-
~e state's ~wat~dog' a~n~ ~ibIe ~o~ ~d Cal~ has ~~ ~e work.
Ma~h 1999'
DueinS the ?~ 15 years, sm~, mmsporta- co~s~d~$ engineers for
~d~s~,m~yto~tp~f~ p~ori~ safe~ projec~ ~d not seedy
wor~d ~ ~d to ~t some ~p~ ~e~s f~ ~r p~ h~u, ~ A~-
~b~ ~ ~v~ co~ ~ ~~ ~$ ~ ~d ~It m~
~ y~ of c~ law, co~ ~ve ~ndu~ ~ ~ for w~ a ~~ ~t of
~t con~a~ work ~t~ ~ ~ ~ work ~ ~dy ~ compb~
vice s~tem ~ ~ola~o~ ol ~ Ca~ ~m ~ ~ dm~
Com~on ff it ~ ~ ad~y ~d~ ~ ~ F~ ~y B~.
Cairns or any ~om of ~ e~. ~ ~ eyre ~u~ ~ se~t
s~ o~en~ Con~c~g out of gove~ent ~ices ~ ~t ~ ~
should employ ~e ~ obvio~lynotb~edby ~6~ sere notbede~y~~byg~
~date. But ~e put dozen ye~ ~ve ~v~ o~ ~way p~ ~y k~ ~ce
approprio~ m~ s~n ex~ve ~figa~o~ ~er de~ ~ deh~.' ~ p~, C~ m~t
of con~oe~rS ~ ~e ~ of coning ouL esp~y as ~a~ly ~ at l~t ~ s~ ~ ~ve
accorain'ate it applies to desl~ and eng~eer~g of
tr~pot~fioa se~ices. ~e eff~t of ~e s~on~n~b~d~d~work
~uc~offng d~iom - ~d ~d~y ove~g s~t- ~t o~ wo~d ~ve ~ ~ffo~
wOefOOdS O~d tO ut~ ~at wo~d pro,de a p~ess for con- by private com~.
deliver in ~ac~g out ~ese Mnc~om - ma~ ~e ~O, Cg~ ~
prac~ctl ~e of con~c~ for desi~ ~d able ~ ~ s~t
~he mos~ cosb en~ee~g se~c~ ve~ d~ ~ hc~ ~c pm~ it
o~ ~e d~iom on proper con~ac~g pr~ ~ ~e de~.
manne~ ced~e (at leut ~ ~e cue of Cal~ con- ~y ~ de~w~ o~ o~
ttac~) ~ the ~nds of a ~uperior court pr~, ~ud~g ~ghway ~b~n
judge. ~ ~lon pm]~,' ~ ~O ~.
Respond~g to recent co~t decisiom ~o~ md 1~ ~pom~
, h~~o~dsof~~ts~d coReac~d out bo~ the d~i~ ~d con-
~ ~~8 ~Y of i~ co~t con- sttuction oI their latse tta~portation
~ac~ - ~g ~e work ~-ho~e - w~ pt~. Howeve~ ~ere ~ve ~n so~
p~dence su~ges~ ~ey shoed do ~e o~ ~ent ~ges,
to ~q~e Cal~ to ~d~ ~e ~ rate s~tor con,acton. R~ent le~on
~d e~e~ ~s~iat~ wi~ ~ ~a~- ~s vest~ 1~ ~d te~onal ag~ci~
~ ~d ~amly Iay~g off ~,~ se~ce se~g p~o~ for
employes. ldeall~ Cal~am or ~y state that are progra~ed th~u~h the state
age~ should have ~e R~ oEse~g ~potn~on s~tem. ~ ~se comes
~table s~ff levels. ~ey shoffid employ the on top o~ ~e l~)~ar~ld ~nd of "serf-help
approp~ ~x of~n~c~ ~ a~o~ coun~es' to ta~ si~¢ant
date fiucma~g wor~ds ~d ~ deUver l~al sa~ t~ ove~td~ for ~pot~on
proj~ ~ ~e most c~t-eff~five, ~eiy p~o~. ~ a ~ulL subs~al amo~
~et. o~ ~anspottafion ~d~g am ra~ed and
~ November ~8, ~e ~ A~- con~U~ by l~al or ~gional
~essionai En~ee~ ~ Ca~o~ Govern. ~~on ptoj~ ~ve
ment (PECG) ~on over ~e ~ of p6vate real ~[[~ used by Calfram t~t
co~rtt~es to contract out for tieeiSa, engineer-S;mta Barbara County. The orib, inal plan
~'"' i~g, and envLtottmental services for state after the sales tax override was adopted in
highways, i~ the state contributes less than 1989 was to deblver 15 projects in 20 years-
hal~ the money to the project. ~ '50 per- the LLfe of the tax ove~cle - but county 06
cent" rule enabled teeny sel~-help courtties tichis wanted to complete delivery in just
to accelerate projects on the state h~ghway 10 years. As of the end of last yeir, 10
system thatotherwlsewou~dhavebeensub- · projects have been completed. Of the 11
ject to Casttans desi~TI, ensineetin8, envL.'on-private contracts, SLx are on ti~e or accel-
mental ~aIysls, and project management. erated; five ate delayed. All three projects
Lrr~ottunately, the Supreme Court deci~on desig3~ed by Celttans were delayed b), at
a~l pressure/xom with.in Celttans to L-vqu- least a year. Ten years a~o, the cost of these
ence local projects may result in erosion of projects was est~nated at $133 m~on; now
the 50 percent tule. the cost is estimated st $12.5 million. Agency
Se~ormamse~atseveralseLf-helpcotm- 5ta~ give credit to consultants, who they
ties w~th sua:ea~ project deliver/records believe are more motivated to work within
have expressed concern that a more budgets arid fi~d value e~i/r~eerin$. T~e Uff~e Hoover
emboldened P£CG will pressure Casttans to The Little Hoover CommiesJan's 1995 Comm.;$$;on
britts more design and enstneering work recommendation to place a constitutional ! 995
back to state engineers, rather than continu- amendment before CaLLfornie's voters to
ing to ~ow local and re, anal agencies to asswe state agencies ~e &ble to fairly hal- reCommender;on
conh-act out the work. The e~ect c~i this ac- ance the interests oi both the dvi] service J~o place
tion would be clevastat~g on project deity- and taxpayers is as pertinent now as it wa~ ¢on$~h2/~ona/
ery. l:ollowin§ are some examples of weT. l- [o~ years ago. A~endes Like C~lttins must
known~pmjectsusLngcreaiivean! be given the flexibility to establish amendment
flexible project tooeasement and delivery worlcforce levels that meet long-term, base before Cal]forn[a~
methods that may wither away ff the con- needs, and supplement that worlcforce with
'~-" stra~ on co~tractLn$ out are extended to private consultants and labor to assu~e that YaMrs )to assure ..
local transportation asenc~s: in~astTucture projects ape clelivered in the slam agencies are
Santa Clara County Transportation most tLmel)~ cost-effective manner~ using
Authority. Olltrans initially estL, nated a 17-the best project ~leI~very technologies. balance
year completion for desis'n, ensinee:ing,
envtro~men~ cieranee, and cons~ction ~ inleresfs of both
of three state I~$hways in the county to re- the c[vi[ service
Ueve ~afftc consestior~. Since the author~- and ~ers is
zation for the sales tax was only ~0 years,
~ beLievL~ they could Lmprove on the as per,neet now'
Celttans estimate, the authority assumed as/t WaS [our
con~'o~ of ~e p~ects. Instead, us~ a the~- yeon ago.
unlque parmership of Celtram ove~$ht,
project me. easement by Bechtel, and
m~.isl~tive and ~mancial
the authority, some seven years were carved
o~ the project delivery.
Contra Costa County. The county trans-
Fcr~tion authority was prepared to
more than ha~ of this project to close gaps
on State goute ¢. As a result, the local
agency was able to control the project and
conduct the engtneerin$ design and envi-
rorm~enta! reviews aggressively and cre-
w---. atively - with private sector consu.ltants -
and save six to n~ne months L~ deLiverieS
the project~ compared with the CaltTa~
schedule.:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR
CUP 96-09, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN
STREET AND ALMOND STREET, SUBMITTED BY SANBAG
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI S:
Conditional Use Permit 96-09, located at the southeast comer of Carnelian and Almond Streets, in
the Very Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on
April 24, 1996, to convert the existing Maloof residence and accessory structures to a workshop
museum (arts and crafts center) and construct a single family residence for Mr. Maloofon the same
property.
Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and
Waiver to Annexation form signed by SANBAG is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectful~su~ed, ~,~ 5,
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sd
Attachment
t~ESOLUTION NO. q q"/71
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR CUP 96-09
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the: Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFO RE, THE CITY CO UNC [L O F THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
~"~'.~i~/~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
, ':..:~':'~'.~.
.~'/~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
;(~~:~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WOKK PROGRAM
PROJECT: CUP 96-09
STREET LIGHTS:
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
S1
S2 10
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail Tuff Non-Turf Trees Street
Dist. D.G.SF. S.F. S.F. Ea. Trees
LI 13~300 23
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
DU or
Parcel Acres S 1 S2 L !
1 I 1 I I -
Annexation Date: August 4, 1999
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, A!CP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15798, LOCATED SOUTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RYLAND
HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number
15798, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map No. 15798, located south of Highland Avenue, East of East Avenue, was
approved by the Planning Commission on July 23, 1997, for a residential subdivision of 45 single
family lots on t 9.26 acres of land in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
The Developer, Ryland Homes of Calitbrnia, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $995,600
Labor and Material Bond $497,800
Monumentation Bond $ 4,650
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and
Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the
Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted, ,
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sd
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
C,4 TALPA -.,, 5N2KESTOhE -- ST. ST,
SITE
I,...,.
V.~CTOR~ $TFEET
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOttGA
COUNTY OF $A" BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT MAP NUMBER 15798 AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15798, submitted by Ryland Homes of California,
Inc., located south of Highland Avenue east of East Avenue, being a division of 45 single family
lots on 19.26 acreas of land in the Residential District, was approved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rm~cho Cucamonga on July 23, 1997, and is compliance with the
State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS Tentative Tract Map No. 15798 is the final map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final
map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement
Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by by Ryland Homes of California,
Inc., as developer; and
NOW', THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Tentative Tract Map No. 15798
be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF Tile CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATI'ON OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
iMAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR. TRACT MAP
NUMBER 15798
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of t972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 8, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.8 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to axmex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to
the Maintenance District; and
WHEP, EAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to
the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed
annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW,~ THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to
the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy
of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
I:.AI-IlD, I I /~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.~
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND ~
HIGHLAND A VENUE
\ I
\ I
E'T \
", SEE SLEET NO. 5
'~"~ ~ SEE SHEET NO. 4
' ~ SEE SHEET NO. 2
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA
. ~~,.,;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: TRACT 15798
STREET iLIGHTS:
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
S1 27 4
S6
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea.
L8 7,838 137
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel Units S8 S 1 L8
N/A 45 45 45 45
Annexation Date: August 4, 1999
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCttO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
I)ATF,: August 4, 1999
T(): Mayor and Members of the City Cotmoil
Jack Lain, AICP, City Mamtgcr
FR()M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: l,inda R, Beck, Jr. I.inginccr' ,~
SUllJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMIiNTS, RE[~EASE TIlE FAITIll:U1, PI!RFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND (CERT[FICATii OF DEPOSIT) AND FILE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP I5519,
LOCATED ON TIlE EAST SIDE OF TEAK WAY NORT[ I OF VICTORIA, SUBMI~q'ED
BY INLAND ACOUSTICS AND TEAK WAY ASSOC[ATIiS
RECOM51 ENI)ATION:
The required improvements lbr Parcel Map 15519, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended lhat the City Council accept said improvements, authorize Ihc City l':nginccr to file a Notice
o[' Completiol~ and authorize the City Clerk to release the I:aithli~I Pcrlbrmancc Bond and accept a
Maintenance tkmd.
IIACKG !{OUSD/ANA !~YS IS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Parco[ Map 15519. the applicant was required to complete street
improvements. The improvcmc~ts have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release
the cx ist ing Faith fi~l Pcrlbrmancc Bond aml accept a Maintenance Boml.
l)cvcloper: Inland Acoustics, Inc. (Tcak Way Associates)
323 South Sierra Way _
San Bernardino. CA 92408
Release: Faith fi~l Pcrlbrmancc Bond 428481S $21.200.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond Certificate of Deposit $2.120.00
Rcspcctfi~lly submitted,
Wi0j~J. )Ncil
Git>r Engineer
WJ():l~R[}:ls
NO.
A RESOt. UTION OF THE CITY OF I.U\NCtlO
CUCAM()NGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIN(i
PUBLIC [MPROVEM[:,NTS [:OR PARC[iI~ MAP 15519,
AN[) AUT[i()RIZING TIlE FILING OF A N()'['I£'I.: ()F
COMPI,IiTI()N [:()R TIlE WORK
Wt [EREAS, the construction of public improvements tbr l'a,'ccl Map 15519,
have bccn completed to the satisthction of the City Engineer; and
WHEI{EAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be tiled, ccrtilying the
work complete.
NOW TtlEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the
City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Comptction with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
3HIHddV~
/i\ ~,~ WELLS FARGO BANK '"
I~°'1006529580-000
Omce Montevia Business Center DateJuly !9~!9,99 A~um$ P: ] 5~-~
Payabmto**TEAK WAY ASSOC. & CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA*******
Race,veal from-- - - , ...... ' L L C
Renewalterm 1-y~ar Maturity date July 19, 2000 Interaslrate 4,30 % Annual13ercentageyield._~_,._..~O~%
Inieras! w,II be compule<l on a 360 0ay year bas~s. Inleras! will be paid .M.o.,'I. t h ] ~' and [~ credited to accourn! number 0 _(]_~ ] -- ~Z[~_ "7 ~1 ]
or [] pa~d 5y check.
This cer~ficate is non-transferable. Presenlalion of the original carl~ficate. signed by the payee. is required to withdraw funds. If the deposit is vv~jff~3mw~3.j;~lfora matunty. ~era
may be an early w~thdrawal fee At matunty, this deposit w,II automaticalN renew. The terms of the cer~tficale. including the int®~eal rate 4g~f'annu~tDj~.rcen~aga yie/d. are
~emDer FD
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG'A
STAFF REPORT
\
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lmn, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOT1CE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-05, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
NINTH STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SEARING
INDUSTRIES
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for CUP 97-05, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
of Completion mid authorize the City Clerk to accept a Maintenance Bond and release the Faithful
Pcrfommnce Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 97-05, located on Northeast Comer of Ninth Street and
Vineyard Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements~ It is recommended that City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Searing Industries
8901 Arrow Route
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release: Faithful Perfom~ance Bond 812350 $350,868.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond 812350 $ 35,087.00
Respectfully submitted,
t?,ESOL(JT1ON NO. qq'/7.5'
,~\ I?,[~SOLUTION ()1: TIlE CITY ()F R.,XNCI[()
CUCAMONGA. CAI.II'~ORNIA. ACCliI'T[N(; T[
I~UBLIC IMt'!.~OV[~Mt~NTS CUP 97-()5 AND
,,\UTtlORIZING Tllti I:ILING OI:: .,\ N()TICli O!:
COMPI.~ETION !?OR. "I'tI[~ WORK
\ I II:REAS, the construction oFpublic improvements l~.)r C[Jt~ 97-05. have
bccn completed to the satisR~ction oF the City' [.:ngh~ccr; and
WI~II-'.RL:,,\S, a Notice of Completion is required to bc filed, ccrtilying the
work complete,
NOW TItEREFORI!, bc it resolved. that the work is hereby accepted and the
City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder ol'San Bernardino County'.
Z
'W"I'I3H
1A~3~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
[)AT1):: ,August 4. 1999
T(): Mayor and Members ol' tile City Cot,ucil
Jack Lain. AICP. City Manager
FROM: William .I. O'Neil. City Engineer
IIY: [.inda R. Beck. Jr. Enginc~
S[IB.II.~C'[': RF~!A'LASI; 'I't IE FAITt IFUI. PEI{FORMAN(T'. B()NI). Nt ~N'IBI~R 439904S. AND
ACCEI'T MAINTI~NANCF~ BOND F()R '['I{ACT 14803, GENERALLY
I.()CAT[-~D ON TIlE NORTtlEASTERLY S[I)I~ ()F I'~I.N'I AVI~NUE, EAST OF
S P R UC E A V E N [ ~ E
Ri,;COMM ENI)ATI()N:
The required improvements lbr Tract 14803, on the northeasterly side of Elm Avenue, east of
Spruce Avetree, have been completed in an acceptable manner. It is recommended that the City
Council authorize the (,ity Clerk to release the Faithful Pcrtbrmancc Bond and accept the
Nlaintcnancc Bond.
i?,A C I((; R() I[.; N DIANA LYS IS
As a condition of approval of completion o["l'ract 14803. generally located on the northeasterly side
o 1' I':hn Avenue, cast of Spruce Avenue, the applicant ~vas required to complete street improvements
tbr the Tract. All improvements within Tract 14803 have been completed. The applicant has
submitted a Maintenance Guarantee Btmd. Thcrclbrc. it is recommended that the City Council
rdcasc the existing Faithill Pcrlbrnlance Bond and accept the Maintenance [lond as follows:
Developer: Lewis Development Company
1156 North Mountain Avenue
[lpland. CA. 91785
Release t:aith~id t~erR~rmancc Bond: Accept Maintenance
439904S in the amount of$367.000 00 439904S in the amount ot'$36.700.00
VICINITY MAP
TRACT 14803
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
I)ATt!:: ::\:lgust 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
.lack Lain, AICP, City Manager
F'I{()M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: I,inda R. Beck, Jr. Enginccr~
SIJBJI~CT: R!~L[]ASI~ TIlE FA['I"I IFU[, PERFORMANCE BOND, NUMIII:;R 428205S AND ACCEPT
MAINTENANCE BOND F'OR TRACT 15526 GENI~RAIA,Y LOCATED AT THE
S()U'I'HWEST CORN[~R OF MII, LIKEN AVENUE ANI) M()tJNTAIN VIEW DRIVE
RECOMMENI)ATION:
'['hc required improvcrncnts lbr Tract 15526, at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View
I)rivc have been completed in an acceptable manner. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the
City Clerk to release the Faithlh[ I)crlbrmancc I~1ond and accopt the Maintenance Bond
!IACK(;R()UNl)/ANALYSIS
As a condition of approval o1' completion of Tract 15526, generally located at the southwest comer oF Milliken
Avenue and Motretain View I)rivc. the applicant was required to complete street improvements tbr the Tract.
All improvements within 'l'tact 15526 have bccn completed. The applicant has submitted a Maintenance
(;ual'antcc Itond. Thoreft, re, it is rccommcndcd that the City ('tmncil release tim cxisting Faithill
I'crtbrmancc Bond and accept the Maintcnancc Bond as Ibllows:
I)cvctopcr: I,cwis l)cvclopmcnt Company
1156 North Mountain
[Jpland, CA 91785
Release Faithlht i~crtbrmancc Bond: Accept Maintenance Bond:
428205S in the amount of $510.700.0() 4282(15S in the amount ot* $51.070.00
Respect fully submitted,
William J.
(,ity IrS~ginccr
W.I():I,t{B:ls
VICINITY MAP
TRACT 15526
_._.-.- /,/ ~'
~ "'""- ..nO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO RECOMMEND REJECTION OF ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR
JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR CITY-WIDE FACILITIES AS NON-
RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council reject all bids for janitorial services for city-wide facilities,
as non-responsive to the needs of the City.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 23, 1999, for the
subject project. All bids exceed the autkodzed budget by a substantial amount (bid summary
attached). Staff will rebid this project at a later date.
Respectfully subm. itted,
With'tim J. 0 Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DB:jau
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: iMayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
iMichael D. Long, Supervising Publ//dWorks Inspector
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT
IN THE AMOUNT OF $556,261.42 ($505,692.20 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY)FOR
'THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION AND STORM
DRA1N PROJECT, FROM UTICA AVENUE TO PITTSBURGH AVENUE TO THE
APPARENT LOW BIDDER, VANCE CORPORATION, TO BE FUNDED FROM AD
82-1R ACCOUNT NO. 93-4130-6028. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $579,000.00
FROM THE FUND BALANCE OF AD 82-1R TO BE PLACED IN AD 82-1R
ACCOUNT NO. 93-4130-6028 FOR THE PROJECT INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION
SURVEYING AND SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $579,000.00 from the fund balance of AD 82-1R to be placed
in AD 82-1R Account No. 93-4130-6028, award and authorize for execution of the contract in fi~e amount of
$556,261.42 ($505,692.20 plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Fourth Street Rehabilitation and Storm
Drain Project, from Utica Avenue to Pittsburgh Avenue to the apparent low bidder, Vance Corporation, to be funded
from AD 82-1R Account No. 93-4130-6028. The additional $22,738.58 will be used for construction surveying
and soils and materials testing.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on July 13, 1999, for the subjectproject. The
Engineer's estimate was $781,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in
accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Rc sp ~.~f3.d i y submitre. d, ~.~
Will ix'~-~. O,N~. e( .ii 'The. "~')
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:MDI.:Is
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION
FROM UTICA AVENUE TO PITTSBURGH AVENUE
Bids Opened on July 13, 1999 Engineefts Estimate = $781.000.00
Vance Corporation EGN Construction Laird Consruction
Item Item Unit of Estimated Total Total Total
No. Description Measure Quantit3~ Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
I Remove AC Pave, incl Sawcutting SF 183890 $0.22 $40,455.80 $0.176 $32,364.64 $0.20 $36,778.00
2 Unclassifed Excavation (F) CY 3980 $6.35 $25,273.00 $9.79 $38,964.20 $12.75 $50,745.00
3 Const 0.50' CAB TON 6900 $13.00 $89,700.00 $11.92 $82,248.00 $9.50 $65,550.00
4 Construct 0.42' AC Pavement TON 5792 $24.70 $143.062.40 $29.38 $170.168.96 $24.65 $142.772.80
5 Const vairable thickness AC Pvmt TON
incl cracksealing & weed kill 298 $52.50 $15,645.00 $29.38 $8,755.24 $40.00 $11,920.00
6 Vairable Cold Plane - 0.10' to 0.15' SY 3680 $1.20 $4,416.00 $1.70 $6,256.00 $1.50 $5,520.00
7 Adj Sexxer Manhole to Grade EA 13 $270.00 $3,510.00 $300.00 $3,900.00 $275.00 $3,575.00
8 Construct Manhole #2 EA 2 $3,280.00 $6,560.00 $3,410.00 $6,820.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00
9 Const 14' CB w/local depression EA 1 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $3,765.00 $3,765.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
10 Const Juncture #2 EA 1 $870.00 $870.00 $705.00 $705.00 $450.00 $450.00
11 Const Transition Structure #3 kS ! $6,150.00 $6,150.00 $4,825.00 $4,825.00 $3,750.00 $3,75000
12 Const PCC bulkhead for 60" RCP EA 1 $560.00 $560.00 $200.00 $200.00 $750.00 $750.00
13 Const 8" PCC gutter/12" Curb LF 60 $23.00 $1.380.00 $11.75 $705.00 $30.00 $1,800.00
14 Install 60" RCP LF 1229 $116.00 $142,564.00 $108.50 $133,346.50 $110.00 $135,190.00
15 Install 24" RCP LF 7 $103.00 $721.00 $60.00 $420.00 $300.00 $2,100.00
16 Signing. striping, pvmnt markings LS I $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
17 Traffic Control LS I $14,425.00 $14,425.00 $9,450.00 $9.450.00 $47,750.00 $47,750.00
$505,692.20 $507,893.54 $527,150.80
E.L. Yeager Ho!land-Lowe All American Asphalt
Item Item Unit of Estimated Total Total Total
No. Description Measure Quantity Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
I Remove AC Pave, incl Sax~cutting SF 183890 $0.10 $18,_~8 .00 $0.20 $36,778.00 $0.33 $60,683.70
2 Unclassifed Excavation (F) CY 3980 $11.00 $43.780.00 $15.65 $62,287.00 $17.50 $69.650.00
3 Const 0.50' CAB TON 6900 $13.50 $93,150.00 $13.05 $90,045.00 $12.50 $86,250.00
4 r- ..........~ ira, ~c Pavement TON 9792 ~74.00 $139.008.00 $27.60 $159,859.20 $27.50 $159.280.00
5 Const vairabte thickness AC Pvmt TON
incl cracksealing & weed kill 298 $50.00 $14,900.00 $36.50 $10,877.00 $35.00 $10,430.00
6 Vairable Cold Plane - 0. t0' to 0.15' SY 3680 $1.50 $5,520.00 $1.90 $6,992.00 $1.25 $4,600.00
7 Adj Se~ er Manhole to Grade EA 13 $550.00 $7,150.00 $428.00 $5,564.00 $600.00 $7,800.00
8 Construct Manhole #2 EA 2 $3.000.00 $6,000.00 $3,100.00 $6,200.00 $3250.00 $6,500.00
9 Const 14' CB w/local depression EA 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,280.00 $4,280.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
10 Const Juncture #2 EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 $642.00 $642.00 $425.00 $425.00
11 Const Transition Structure ~3 LS I $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4~387.00 $4,387.00 $4,750.00 $4,750.00
12 Const PCC bulkhead for 60" RCP EA 1 $600.00 $600.00 $160.00 $160.00 $650.00 $650.00
13 Const 8" PCC gutter/l? Curb LF 60 $50.00 $3,000.00 $34.00 $2,040.00 $30.00 $1,800.00
14 Install 60" RCP LF 1229 $115.00 $141,335.00 $137.65 $169,171.85 $140.00 $172,060.00
15 Install 24" RCP LF 7 $150.00 $1,050.00 $65.00 $455.00 $65.00 $455.00
16 Signing. striping, pvmnt markings LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
17 Traffic Control LS 1 $61,500.00 $61,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00
$550,282.00 $571,738.05 $624,333.70
Silvia Construction Cueno Development Riverside Construction
item item Unit of Estimated Total Total Total
No. Description Measure Quantity Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
I Remove AC Pave. incl Sawcutting SF 183890 $0.165 $30,341.85 $0.25 $45,972.50 $0.25 $45,972.50
'9
2 Unclassi:'ed Excavation (F) CY ,~ 80 $16.60 $66,068.00 $16.00 $63.680.00 $15.00 $59.700.00
3 Const 0.50' CAB TON 6900 $15.80 $109.020.00 $15.30 $105,570.00 $12.00 $82,800.00
4 (;onstruc~ v.~z AC Pavement TthNi <'m'~ $OO ~ $~? 968 00 ¢>~ *,n ~16q 0'7,0 OC~ $08 OO $162, ! 76.00
5 Const vairable thickness AC Pvmt TON
incl cracksealing & weed kill 298 $53.60 $15,972.80 $63.00 $18.774.00 $43.00 $12.814.00
6 Vairable Cold Plane - 0.10' to 0.15' SY 3680 $t.08 $3,974.40 $1.80 $6,624.00 $1.55 $5,704.00
7 Adj Se~ er Manhole to Grade EA 13 $268.00 $3,484.00 $500.00 $6,500.00 $750.00 $9,750.00
8 Construct Manhole #2 EA '~ $3.516.25 $7.032.50 $3.300.00 $6.600.00 $4.000.00 $8.000.00
9 Const 1 -" C B w/local depression EA I $6.513.40 $6.513.40 $4,000.00 $4.000.00 $6.000.00 $6.000.00
10 Const Jt:ncture #2 EA 1 $1.25/.70 $1.257.70 $1.275.00 $1.~/>.00 $~.~00.00 $2.500.00
11 Const Transition Structure ~3 LS 1 $4.o~ 1 15 $4,o31.15 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
12 Const PCC bulkhead for 60" RCP EA I $1,043.60 $1,043.60 $625.00 $625.00 $1,500,00 $t,500.00
13 Const 8" PCC gutter/IT' Curb LF 60 $86.35 $5,181.00 $29.00 $1,740.00 $45.00 $2,700.00
14 Install 60" RCP LF i229 ql'~'~ ~q $156,390.25 $144.00 $176,976.00 $110.00 $135,190.00
15 Install 24" RCP LF 7 $304.00 $2,128.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 $160.00 $1,120.00
16 Signing, striping, pvmnt markings LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
17 Traffic Control LS 1 $44,700.00 $44,700.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $110,073.00 $110,073.00
$632,926.65 $634,858.50 $667,999.50
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:: Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist
SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-01 - RONALD AND KATHLEEN
SCHULFER - An application to designate the Koch House as an Local Landmark,
located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-021-01.
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - RONALD AND KATHLEEN SCHULFER - A
request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Koch
House (built in 1908), an Historic Landmark, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue -
APN: 1100-021-01. Related files: Landmark Designation 99-01 and Conditional Use
Permit 99-28.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the requests by resolution and minute order, respectively.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Historical Significance: Fred Koch was born in 1867. He arrived in Etiwanda in 1891 and became
a resident on the property at 7491 Eftwanda, where he worked. He and his wife were still living on
the property 66 years later in 1957. He first worked for Harry B. Gurley; owner of the ranch, and
a son of John Gudey who served President Abraham Lincoln as an assistant. Mr. Koch acquired
the property and about the same time he married his wife Freda, in 1896.
They built a new home on the property several hundred feet east of Eftwanda Avenue in 1908.
They later moved the home to its present location at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue, without incurring a
single crack in the plaster. In 1957, they were still living in the home after 61 years of marriage.
Mr. Koch was also active in the Etiwanda Congregational Community Church, having served on its
Board, as well as having served on the Eftwanda School Board and having worked in other
community activities. He was a member of the Etiwanda Citrus Association during most of his
lifetime, from soon after its organization in 1890to its final year in 1956. Mr. Koch, at his retirement,
owned about 35 acres of citrus and grapes.
On May 26, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommended approval of
both the Historic Landmark Designation and Mills Act Agreement. The Historic Preservation
Commission Staff Report is attached for reference.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LD 99-01 & MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - SCHULFER
August 4, 1999
Page 2
Landmark Designation: The subject site and structures qualify for landmark designation based upon
the many criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the following significant
areas: historical and cultural significance are outlined in the Facts for Finding section. (See Exhibit
"A", Planning Commission Staff Report, Facts for Finding.) The requested designation area
includes the subject lot and residence.
Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The Agreement has been drafted and reviewed.
Staff estimates the annual property tax savings to the owner could be as much as $1,496.65 and
the reduction in tax proceeds to the City would be $50.89. The exact amounts are dependent upon
the County Assessor's property valuation based on income potential and the capitalization rate at
the time of assessment.
CONCLUSION
Approval of Landmark Designation 99-01 and Mills Act Agreement 99-01 continues to be important
in our efforts to provide the preservation of the community's rich cultural heritage.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad i ~l~r' ,~r~~,~,~ ~
City Planner
BB:CM:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated May 26, 1999
Exhibit "B"- Historic Preservation Commission Resolution 99-02 dated May 26,
1999
Exhibit "C" - City Council Resolution dated August 4, 1999
Exhibit "D" - Mills Act Agreement dated August 4, 1999
CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 26, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist
SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION - 99-01 o RONALD AND KATHLEEN
SCHULFER - An application to designate the Koch House as a Local Landmark,
located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-021-01.
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - RONALD AND KATHLEEN SCHULFER - A
request to implement the use of the Mi~ls Act to reduce property tax on the Koch
House (built in 1908), an historic Landmark, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue -
APN: 1100-021-01. Related files: Landmark Designation 99-01 and Conditional
Use Permit 99-28.
BACKGROUND:
Historical Significance: Fred Koch was born in 1867. He arrived in Etiwanda in 1891 and
became a resident on the property at 7491 Etiwanda, where he worked. He and his wife
were still living on the property 66 years later in 1957. He first worked for Harry B. Gurley;
owner of the ranch, and a son of John Gurley who served President Abraham Lincoln as an
assistant. Mr. Koch acquired the properly and about the same time he married his wife
Freda, in 1896.
They built a new home on the property several hundred feet east of Etiwanda Avenue in
1908. They later moved the home to its present location at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue, without
incurring a single crack in the plaster. In 1957, they were still living in the home after 61
years of marriage.
Mr. Koch reported the area crop production to the California Crop and Livestock Reporting
Service from 1914 until 1957. He kept a ledger, one page devoted to each month with each
day's work recorded as to its task, time spent, and expenditures involved. An accurate
weather record is included for each day. It is also an excellent log of the community
activities.
Mr. Koch was also active in the Etiwanda Congregational Community Church, having served
on its Board, as well as having served on the Etiwanda School Board and having worked
in other community activities. He was a member of the Etiwanda Citrus Association during
most of his lifetime, from soon after its organization in 1890 to its final year in 1956. Mr.
Koch, at his retirement, owned about 35 acres of citrus and grapes.
,,,. J
Ex ;t "A"
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
LD 99-01, MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 2
Mrs. Koch was weld known for her activities with the Ladies Aid of Etiwanda Congregational
Community Church, which she served for more than 50 years as Treasurer until her
resignation in 1955. The couple had two children, a son and a daughter, and four
grandsons.
Along with Landmark Designation 99-01 and Mills Act Agreement 99-01, staff is concurrently
processing Conditional Use Permit 99-28. Upon approval by the City Planner, the applicant
wishes to establish a custom silk plant arrangement business within the workshop located
in the carriage house.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: This two-story Folk-Victorian farmhouse is in excellent condition. The main
structure consists of 1,525 square feet of living space with hard wood floors, and an
additional 225 square-foot basement plus an attic. Photo documentation reveals that at
some point a front porch was added to the original structure. In 1997, a detached, two-car
garage, workshop and guesthouse was added. This new structure is referred to as the
"carriage house." The house and detached garage sit on approximately 1-1/2 acres of land.
B. Landmark Designation: The subject site and structure certainly qualify for landmark
designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance,
including; historical, cultural, architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting.
Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings
section. The requested designation area includes the subject lot and residence.
C. Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed
and is attached for reference. (Exhibit "C").
The concept of the Mills Act is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and
preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. Through the
reduction of property taxes, the property owner is encouraged to reinvest the money saved
from the reduced property tax and use it on improvements to the property. The properties
that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to
determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The
exact amounts of annual property tax savings to the owner are dependent upon the County
Assessor's property valuation which is based on income potential and the capitalization rate
at the time of assessment.
D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of the
Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
LD 99-01, MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 3
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period,
type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the early 1900's when grove and
vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. The
residence is an example of a grove house which was common at the turn of
the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 91 years old and an example of Folk-
Victorian architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by Fred Koch who lived in it for over 66 years. The
Koch family had a long established involvement in the local community.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once
common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its
details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The Folk-Victorian style is preserved and artfully incorporated into the
residence with such features as clapboard siding, decorative diamond pane
second story windows, enhanced fan gable treatment, front porch and site
orientation.
Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety and historical continuity of
the neighborhood.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
LD 99-01, MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 99-01 - SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 4
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant identifiable
feature along Etiwanda Avenue and thereby contributes to the entire
neighborhood.
CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark designation was advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all
property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the
attached Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation 99-01 and recommend approval, by minute
action, to the City Council for the Mills Act Agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad ~~
City Planner
BB:CM/Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Photos
Exhibit "C" - Agreement Schedule List of Improvements
Resolution Recommending Approval
Landn~rk 99-01
Site Location Map
,Road
Subject Site
Bldngs.shp .
Parcels.shp /~
Esp.shp '7'/
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Historic Preservation Commission
lvIILLS ACT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL:
(To be completed by the Applicant)
Potential Structure / Property Improvement Time - Line
Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years. List them
in order of owner's priority.
~e~ ' ' '
I ceai~ ~t I m presently ~e leg~ o~er of~e suNect prope~. F~er, I ac~owledge ~e
supplemen~ info~ation on ~is fo~ ~1I ~ ~ed ~ ~ e~bit a~hed to ~e Mills Act
A~eement. Date: ~-t5-
RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-01, DESIGNATING THE
KOCH HOUSE (BUILT tN APPROXIMATELY 1908) AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7491 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1100-021-01.
A. Recitals.
1. Ronald L. and Kathleen J. Schulfer have filed an application for a Landmark
Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 26, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.5 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 7491 Eftwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng on May 26, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Si.qniificance:
Findinq 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the eady 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community
and the region. The residence is an example of a grove house
which was common at the turn of the century.
Findinq 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 91 years old and an example of
Folk-Victorian architecture.
Findinq 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Ex it "B"
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
LD99-01 - RONALD & KATHLEEN SCHULFF:R
May 26, 1999
Page 2
Fact/s: The house was built and lived in by the Fred Koch family for many
years. The Koch family has a long established involvement in the
local community.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Findinq 1: , The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The Folk-Victorian style is preserved and artfully incorporated into
the residence with such features as clapboard siding, decorative
diamond pane second story windows, and enhanced fan gable
treatment.
c. Neighborhood and Geographic Settingl
Findinq 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the histodc character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the vadety and historical
· continuity of the neighborhood.
Findinc] 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along Etiwanda Avenue and thereby contributes
to the entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 26th day of May 19,99, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
LD99-01 - RONALD & KATHLEEN SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 3
~" -J La~/T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Histodc Preservation Commission held on the 26th day of May 1999,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINC), MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. E~ ¢_ /'7~:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC
LANDMARK 99-01 TO DESIGNATE THE KOCH HOUSE (BUILT IN
APPROXIMATELY 1908)AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT
7491 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1100-021-01.
A. Recitals.
1. Ronald L. and Kathleen J. Schulfer have filed an application for Landmark
Designation 99-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 26, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended
approval.
3. On August 4, 1999, the City Council held their meeting and approved Landmark
Designation 99-01.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.5 acres of land, basically a
rectangular configuration, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and
facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the
1900's when grove and vineyard production was at
its peak in the community and the region. The
residence is an example of a grove house which was
common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most
of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 91 years old and an
example of Folk-Victorian architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with
someone renowned or important or a local
personality.
Fact/s: The house was built and lived in by the Fred Koch
family for many years. The Koch family has a long
established involvement in the local community.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with a
business or use which was once common but is now
rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design
used by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove
and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed
landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are
beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The Folk-Victorian style is preserved and artfully
incorporated into the residence with such features as
clapboard siding, decorative diamond pane second
story windows, and enhanced fan gable treatment.
c. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety
and historical continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent
a significant identifiable feature along Etiwanda
Avenue and thereby contributes to the entire
neighborhood.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark
designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby approves Landmark Designation 99-01.
6. The Mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and when
RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this Fourth day of August, 1999, by and
between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to
as the "City") and Ronald and Kathleen Schulfer (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner").
WITNESSETH:
A. Reci~ls.
(i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorizes cities to enter into
contracts with the Owners of quafffled Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance, and
restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical
significance;
(ii) Owner possesses fee tide in and to that certain real property, together with
associated structures and Improvements thereon, commonly known as the Koch House and generally
located at the street address 7491 Etlwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (hereinafter
such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property"). A legal description of the Historic
Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference;
Exhibit "D"
(ill) On August 4, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
its Resolution No. 99- thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic
landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code; and,
(iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement
both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and
to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter
3, of Part 2, of Division I of the California Revenue and Taxadon Code.
B. Ag~ement
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows:
1. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and
commence on August 4, 1999, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten years thereafter. Each
year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as
provided in paragraph 2, below.
2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement
(hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall automatically be added to the initial term
of this Agreement, unless notice of non-renewal is mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or City
desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice of non-
renewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the Agreement.
Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least 90 days prior to the annual renewal date, or
served by City to Owner at least 60 days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically
be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest of
the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its
notice to Owner of non-renewal. If either City or Owner serves notice to the other of non-renewal
in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either
from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.
3.~ Standards for Historical ProPerty. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic
Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions:
a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance
of the Historic PropertY. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by this
reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation
of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement.
b. Owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the property according
to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and
Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by
the applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit
c. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment,
of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the County Assessor, State
Department of Parks and Recreation, State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary
to determine Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
4. Provision of Information of Corporation. Owner hereby agrees to furnish City with
any and all information requested by the City which may be necessary or advisable to determine
compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
5. Cancellation. City, following a duly nodced public hearing as set forth in California
Gov. ernment Code Sections 50280, et seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that Owner
breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the
point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also cancel this
Agreement if it determines that the Owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the
manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. in the event of cancellation, Owner may
be subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections
50280, et se(~.
6. Enforcement of Agreement. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel
the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enioin the breach of, the terms
of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City
shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this
Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within 30
days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the
breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that acts to cure
the breach or default may be commenced within 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued
to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms
of this Agreement and ~ay bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner
growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief
against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate.
City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not enforce or
cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for
in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properdes are available to the City to
pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or
default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof
or default herein under.
7~ Binding Effect of Agreement. The Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property
described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth tn this
Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and
restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and
be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each
and every contract, deed or other Instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic
Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and
accepted subiect to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless
of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other
instrument.
City and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of
the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that
Owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner
hereby further declare their understanding and Intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations,
and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics
and significance of the Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner.
8. Notice. Any nodce required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be
provided at th.e address of the respective pardes as specified below or at any other address as may be
later specified by the parties hereto.
To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
- 10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attention: City Planner
To Owner: Ronald and Kathleen Schulfer
7491 Etiwanda Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
9. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be
deemed to create a parmership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns,
nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered ioint ventures or members
of any joint enterprise.
b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents,
and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including
death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations
of Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acdng on his
behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. Owner hereby
agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect
to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of Owner's
ac. tivities in connection with the Historic Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages
and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred
to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans,
specifications or other documents for the Historic Property.
c. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions
contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure to the benefit of the parties herein,
their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the
Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever.
d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce
or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to
determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may
recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other
relief ordered by the court.
e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be
unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptire
legislation, the validity and enforce ability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not
be effected thereby.
f, This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Califo~ia.
10. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and enter into this
Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder
of the County of San Bernardino.
1 l. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a
written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and
year first written above.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated: By:
William ]. Alexander, Mayor
Dated: By:
Owner
Dated: By:
Owner
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
On , Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
personally appeared WILLIAM ]. ALEXANDER, personally know to me to be the person whose name
is subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized
capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity upon behalf of which
the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Debbie Adams
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
On the __ day of , 199__, before me
, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me
or proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed
to within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and the by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
endty upon behalf of which the person(s) acted executed the Instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State
9¥
Exhibit "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
for
Etiwanda Colony Lands S 150 FT W 200 FT
Lot 5 BIk R .69 AC
A.K.A. Assessor Parcel No. 1100-021-01
(Ronald and Kathleen Schulfer)
7491 Edwanda Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739)
Exhibit "B"
THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS
1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires
minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a
property for its originally intended purpose.
2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its
environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical matedHal or
distinctive architectural features shouJd be avoided when possible.
3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations
which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be
discouraged.
Changes: which may have taken place in the course of dme are evidence of the history and
development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment.
5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building,
structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity.
6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible.
In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced
in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of
missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated
by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability
of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures.
7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle means possible.
Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not
be undertaken.
8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected
by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation,
restoration, or reconstruction project.
9. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged
when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural
material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the
property, neighborhood, or environment.
10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that,
if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity
of the structure would be unimpaired.
Exhibit "B- 1"
PROPERTY I~!AINTENANCE
All buildings, structures, yards, and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does
not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are
prohibited:
1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and
windows;
2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash, or debris;
3. Abandoned, discarded, or unused oblects or equipment, such as automobiles, automobile parts,
furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items;
4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas;
5. Any device, decoration, design, structure, or vegetation which is unsighdy by reason of its
height, condition, or its inappropriate location.
Exhibit "C"
POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS
- for
Ronald and Kathleen Schulfer
74.91 Etlwanda Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
This is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the
applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation
Commission's staff.
YEAR IHPROVEHENT
1990/2000 Complete remodel of existing kitchen and pantry facilities.
2000 Re-landscaping of perimeter and Interior ~rounds and parkway trees.
2001 Complete public parkway improvements across frontage of the property. These
Ongoing include, but are not limited to, driveway and sidewalk.
2002 Provlde additional public right-of-way dedication on Etiwanda Avenue for a total
Ongoing of 50' from street centerline to the property line, as indicated in the Etiwanda
Specific Plan.
2003 Convert sub-basement to wine cellar.
2004. Installation of pool and deck.
2005 Strip and refinish interior woodwork.
2006 Circular driveway upgrade.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A
proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium purposes;
along with Design Review of 306 apartment units on 16 acres of land, located
within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by
Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue. The Existing Terra Vista
Community Plan land use designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per
acre). Proposed development density is within the Medium-High Residential
density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed project density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre. The project is located within the
High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre); however, the proposed development is
within the Medium-High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista
Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review
and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium-High
District will apply to the proposed development.
ANALYSIS:
The attached Planning Commission staff report provides detailed analysis of the proposed
project.
The site was previously rough graded for Tract 13859, an apartment project; and all perimeter
streets, East Elm Avenue, Spruce Street, and Church Street, are existing. There are no
remaining trees or significant vegetation on the site.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
August 4, 1999
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Environmental Checklist Form Initial Study Part II has been prepared for the project. In
addition a Noise Impact Study and Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis have been prepared.
Mitigation is included in the attached resolution for air quality, traffic and noise impacts.
~~Biad,,i~'bller
City Planner
BB:DM:MA
Attachments: Planning Commission staff report dated July 14, 1999
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 16000
Resolution of Approval for Development Review 99-13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A
proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 Iots for condominium purposes; along
with Design Review of 306 apartment units, on 16 acres of land located within the
Terra Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue,
Church Street, and East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre). Proposed
development density is within the Medium-High Residential density (14-24 dwelling
units per acre). APN: 1077--421-55 and 60.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Proiect Density: The proposed project density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre. The project is
located within the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre); however, the
proposed development is within the Medium-High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units
per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista
Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Councit.
The standards of the Medium-High District will apply to the proposed development.
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: The proposed project is located in the southwest
quadrant of the Terra Vista Community, existing residential and commercial development is
predominant throughout much of this quadrant. Land Use and Zoning surrounding the site
include:
North - Spruce Avenue Park and an existing apartment community
South - An undeveloped parcel currently zoned High Residential, and Town Center Square
East An undeveloped parcel currently zoned Medium-High Residential
West Terra Vista Business Park and an undeveloped parcel currently zoned High
Residential
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - High Residential (24-30dwelling units per acre); developed within the Medium-
High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) as allowed by the Terra
Vista Community Plan
North - Park/Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
South - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre)/Community Commercial
East Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)
West Office Park/High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre)
::-:"
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Site Characteristics: The site was previously rough graded for Tract 13859, an apartment
project; and all perimeter streets, East Elm Avenue, Spruce Street, and Church Street, are
existing. There are no remaining trees or significant vegetation on the site.
E. Parking Calculations:
Parking Required:
One Bedroom Units - 1.5 spaces/unit X 58 units = 87 spaces (one enclosed space/unit)
Two Bedroom Units - 1.8 spaces/unit X 224 units = 403 spaces (one enclosed space/unit)
Three Bedroom units - 2.0 spaces/unit X 24 units = 48 spaces (two enclosed spaces/unit)
In addition, to the number of spaces required for each unit, one parking space for every four
units is required for visitor parking: 306 units X 0.25 = 77 spaces
Therefore the total number of spaces required is 615. Of this total, a minimum of 330 spaces
must be enclosed within a garage or carport.
Parking Provided:
Enclosed: 357 Open: 259 Total: 616Spaces
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has indicated that Innsbruck Village has been designed with the
following prospective residents in mind: small families with older children, "empty nesters,"
older singles, and young professionals. The applicant has also indicated that this project is
designed for those individuals who are renters by choice. The basic amenities within the
project include upgraded wiring for phone/modem/fax usage, both attached and detached
garages, clubhouse and outdoor activity centers including an outdoor fireplace, fitness center,
pool/spa, and a tot lot. The project is completely fenced, including secudty gates at the project
entry from both Spruce Avenue and Church Street. Pedestrian access gates are provided at
the primary entry points as well as near all three intersections surrounding the site for
pedestrian access to nearby schools, parks, and shopping opportunities.
The project includes a total of 306 units, consisting of 58 one-bedroom, 224 two-bedroom, and
24 three-bedroom units. The unit square footage ranges from 789 square feet to 1,201
square feet. Units are arranged in four building types containing from 4 to 18 units per
building, arranged in both two and three story structures. Enclosed garages are provided for
each unit, and in some cases the garage is accessible directly from the unit.
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (consisting of McNiel, Stewart
and Henderson) reviewed the project on June 15, 1999, and recommended approval subject
to minor modifications. The Design Review Committee recommendations have been
incorporated as conditions of approval. (See Exhibit "G")
C. Technical Review/Gradinq Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the
project on June 14, 1999. AII requirements of the committee are included as conditions of
approval. There were no outstanding or extraordinary issues addressed by the committee.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
The Grading Committee reviewed the project on June 15, 1999, and recommended approval
subject to minor modifications. The following Grading Committee Comments have been
incorporated as conditions of approval:
1. The concrete drainage behind Building 2/3 shall be moved to one side of the drive aisle,
rather than be directed to the middle.
2. Section A-A, along East Elm Street, extend the low retaining wall along the toe of slope
to keep irrigation run-off from draining on the walkway.
3. Section B-B, eliminate the curvilinear nature of the on-site walkway which causes the
use. of retaining walls along the street frontage.
D. Environmental Assessment: The Environmental Checklist Form Initial Study Part II has been
prepared for the project. In addition a Noise Impact Study and Traffic Signal Warrants
Analysis have been prepared. Mitigation is included in the attached resolution for air quality,
traffic and noise impacts.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend issuance of a
Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Tentative Tract 16000
and Design Review 99-13 subject to all conditions of approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit"E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "G" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "H" - Fence and Wall Plan
Exhibit "1" - Design Review Committee Minutes
Exhibit "J" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution Recommending Approval of Tentative Tract 16000
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Review 99-13
~ TENTATIVE TRACT 16000
.~- ~ (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOS[~)
~."'"'~/ / SITE UTILIZATION MAp
~DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
IN 1t-~ ClI'Y ~ R~ C~,
Ty ~ S~ ~DI~,S~ATE ~ C~IF~NIA
v' .~// ~ !X~I~ e~ ~CH. t999
, /
~)
~. ~ ~ , i
/
/
'"
·
;:~_ ~'~
/
~T~T~a
~: ~ ~ ,,/
CHURCH STRE~
SITE PLAN
~CAL~ t%40'
~'ts~'~n~co~UStT,~S TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
~:h:'."~ :(~m~ '~ ;.:,:.':~
~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA ~' 'x=~
........... / .... ENTRY ELEVATION
WALL "-..
ELE~TION ~ 0
~_~._ ,~-,,,~=,
~ .......
~ CHURCH STRE~
~ ~~ .......~ .............................
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
Lewis Apartment Communities TE~ V I STA APARTMENTS ~ ,~,~:., .,~
1156 No~ Motrin A~
~Upl~ C.lifomi. 91786 SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
' ~ ' ~ FI~EPI.ACE Wt AR~OR
LEASIN~OFFICE COURT~'ARD~SPAAREA Wt
PROJECT E~TRY
BB~ NODES .. T~S!t ENCLOSURE
DETAILED ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apa~ment Communities TE~ VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 No~ M~n~in Avcnue
Up~,,a. c',,ro~i, ~l~ SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
~(~ 9BS~tl / ~NC'IIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO~IA
DETAILED ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apartment Communities TJ~RRA VISTA APARTMENTS
~. 1156 Nonfi MmmL~in Avum~
'-.~u~,,~. c,,,~om,, ~,~ SITE 'A'- t. r. 16000
~, 909) 985-O911
TOT LOI'
TOT LOT ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apartment Communities TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 Noah Mountain Avenue
Upl.nd. California, 91786 SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
(9~9] 9~5~71
TENTATIVE TRACT 16000
~)'.o- !iT.
FRO!~IT ELEVATIO
SIDE ELEVATION
£)e~, at Son L.t~en d:
4:12 PStch T)p~cal
Wall Material: (Light Sand FinLi,h) . I ROOF PLA. N (1116= · I..O=
2x 8 Wood Paint Fti.c~ C) ~""~ - E)
Tdm: Stucco 0~,~ F~m
· ^--,-:~,~.,..,~o.t,oo~¢, BUILDING TYPE 1
t',.¥~,~c~b~ ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
LEW~S^~^~T¢O~U~T~S TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~ .... :'=~
REAR ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
· ~:~l) MaI~t:iLi~ S~ ~:n~) 4:12 ~p.
~nm: Sl~co ~ F~m
· ~"'¥'~"~"~,~", BUILDING TYPE 2
C'~) ~1 ~ Gab~
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
R~F PLAN 1t/16' . t'.o~
RANCHO CUCAMONG~ CALIFORNIA
-- ~ El
~/ .
. ~..d ~ ' --~' ~T~.'
REAR ELEVATION - :' ~
FRONT IH.EVATION
' ......." .......' ........-"---'BUILDING TYPE 3
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
t-~'"'S.'",'.RT.',~.~'r,._'O~.,.,,UN,-r~:~TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
R^NC,IO CUCAMONG..M ('ALIFORNIA
-' ~/',~/~/7--'.~' .... '"
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONT EI. EVATION
s-:-~': ....'~L~l~,--~t~:,~~~-,~~r-,~ .'~;~''~'"'''"'~"
REAR EI.EVATION
%~.dt ~l.111 li.tt i I IF'hi ~,lml I il)l~tl t
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
, ,~,,',~ ~,',,,,',~,,:~',-,',,~,~,t,~,,.,,:~ TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANC'ItO C'UC'AMONGA, CALIFORNIA
LE~
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ,.o-,
R 1':^ R 1: I- liYA'l'10 N
Sll)E IE LEVA'I'lO N
511)1:. E I. !-~ V^'l'l 0 N
~' l,,, k,~,~ I't 0() I.' I'I.A N
'""~'"' ...."" GARAGE BUILDING
El'-EVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS
RAN('110 CtJC'AM()N(;,X ('ALl FORNIA )~(';;:.-7-.::: :.'.:~.'..'
~~~/~~ ~ ~' .... ,-,
~]an C
FLOOR PLANS A, B, C, AND D
LEWIS ~P~RTMENT COMMUNITIES TERRA VISTA APARTM E NTS
RANCHO CUCAMONG& CALIFORNIA
0
PLAN E
Plan E
Plan F
FLOOR PLANS
L~w,s ~.~.T.E.T CO..U.m~S TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~.~:,:~:::~
RANCHO CUCAMONG~ CALIFORNIA ~'- '~
[3
SECOND FLOOR
sc^L~_ ~,-. ~- FIRST FLOOR
BUILDING TYPE I COMPOSITES
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIESTERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1 .::!:';'i.::!:::, ":::'::
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~'--~--
0 0 0 I
THIRD FLOOR .
'~ C C,~ FIRST FLOOR
~~, BUILDING TYPE
co~u~m~s TEEEA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
~_~ THIRD FLOOR , L----_~:~
~ ~~ BUILDING TYPE 3
' SECOND FLOOR -~ COMPOSITES
~s ~xs~ co~m~s TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~x~z~..~.
~ RANCHO CUCAMONG~ CALIFORNIA ~ .... ~'~
o
[]
SECOND FLOOR
sc^L& ~,-. r.~' FIRST FLOOR
BUILDING TYPE SUMMARY
BUILDING TYPE 4 - COMPOSITES
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~---.~ ~'
t
I
Squire FooLB i~c
RECREATION BULIDING FLOOR PLAN
~w~s .~.~~ COM~U~m~s TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~..~..~.
..... ~',',~: I ~ . ' ~.'.'.~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
A.~,iL Hit.
/ ~:. '. / 53: :,' .'~ ~'~
. ,.........,....,
il ~. ~ ~ ~ /,~ ,' '~ ,' ' " 'x $2-.,'
,'/// ~.~ /"~Y.'-~-~.-~-. < /- <, ' ~,, .' , '
l t' .q / ~' J / // ~ "- ~ '~'.'.<-J x ,- /-~ .-, ~ , .~.x
7-..< A~ ,, ,0 ~ .. ,,~x,,..../ :..,.,.., %5.' /
.' : .' ,r- '-, ....~ , ' ~ ,
-~./ ~" t / ~''-- [ '~ / · 4 ~ V
i~'~TM '~' J I ~T~' '~'- ~[ ' I ' .t ~ .~-. ~l' ~
[)~-~_~ '(, j_ r ~' :l ~.' ; ,-, ...... - ....
~ /] ~ F'-~-~ ~ ~' ; l."-;" LOT 1
T~r ,--
TRACT 16000 :~-~ ~z
!" ........
~ ~ ~_._,~~, · ....
CHURCH ST
r~Nc~ ~ WALL
Lewis Apa~ment Communities TER~ VISTA APARTMENTS
~Upland, C.lir~i. ~t ~ SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Dan Coleman/Debra Meier June 15, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99~13 -
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for
condominium purposes; along with Design Review of 308 apartment units, located within the Terra
Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation is High Residential
(24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development density is within the Medium High
Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) -APN: 1077-421-39.
Backqround: Tentative Tract 16000 is located in the southwesterly quadrant of the Terra Vista
Planned Community, existing residential and commercial development is predominant throughout
much of this quadrant. Immediately north of Tentative Tract16000 is Spruce Avenue Park and
existing apartments (Tract 12673); lying southerly of Tentative Tract16000 is a portion of an
undeveloped parcel currently zoned High Residential and the Town Center Square; lying easterly
of Tentative Tract16000 is an undeveloped parcel designated Medium High Residential; and finally
located westerly of Tentative Tract1600 is the existing Terra Vista Business Park.
This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the Terra Vista
Community Plan. The proposed net density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range
of Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the Terra
Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City
Council. The standards of the Medium High Residential District will apply to the proposed
development.
Summary of the proposed Innsbruck Villaqe:
The applicant has indicated that Innsbruck Village has been designed with the following prospective
residents in mind: small families with older children, "empty nesters," older singles, and young
professionals. The applicant has also indicated that this project is designed for those individuals
who are renters by choice. The basic amenities within the project include upgraded wiring for
phone/modem/fax usage, both attached and detached garages will be available, clubhouse and
outdoor activity centers including an outdoor fireplace, fitness center, pool/spa, and tot lots.
Issues for Discussion and Consideration:
Perimeter Site Issues
1. Reduce perimeter wall heights to 6-feet maximum, pilasters may remain at 7-feet 8-inches
(refer to page 2 of the Development Plan package).
2. Provide a minimum of 5-feet of landscaping between the public sidewalk and the perimeter
wrought iron fence, particularly at the corner of East Elm and Spruce Avenues (refer to
pages 2 and 2c of the Development Plan package).
3. Gated pedestrian access points have been provided near each of three perimeter
intersections for pedestrian access to surrounding parks and schools - Spruce Avenue Park
and Ruth Musser Middle School located on Spruce Street northerly of East Elm Avenue; La
Mission, Park (yet to be developed) is located on Church Street easterly of Spruce Avenue;
and Coyote Canyon School is located on East Elm Avenue easterly of Spruce Avenue.
EXHIBIT I
DRC COMMENTS
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 2
Consider whether the proposed gated pedestrian entries provided at each intersection
provide adequate and convenient access to the perimeter of the project, particularly for
school age children.
Interior Site Desiqn Issues
1. The project proposes 306 dwelling units which requires 10 recreational amenities per
Development Code Section 17.08.040.H. The plan currently includes the following
amenities: Recreation Building (1), pool/spa (1), outdoor entertainment area and media
center located at the Leasing Pavilion (1), spa/courtyard (1), three large open lawn areas
(3), BBQ Nodes throughout the project (2) = 9 TOTAL amenities.
The project currently includes only one tot lot, which does not comply with the requirement
for "multiple enclosed tot lots." Therefore, no credit has been counted for this amenity. A
project of this size would typically include at least three tot lots. Staff recommends the
addition of two tot lots, and consequently an additional point for this amenity can be included
to increase the amenity package to 10.
2. Increase driveway width at entry to Leasing Office to 26-feet. The adjoining planter finger
must be 6-feet minimum width (outside dimension).
3. Shift location of two trash enclosures to be adjacent to garage buildings (refer to page 1 of
the Development Plan package). In addition, the separation between curbs/sidewalks and
trash enclosures should be 5-foot minimum to allow for appropriate landscape area. The
walkway width between the trash enclosure located near Building 3/3 is not adequate for a
5-foot sidewalk.
4. Whenever planter islands or fingers are used the minimum outside dimension must be 6-
feet (refer to page 1 of the Development Plan package).
Use decorative PCC in front of garages (refer to page 2 of the Development Plan package).
6. Potential locations for two additional tot lots should be considered (consider one tot lot near
north end of Building 2/2, and at the north end between Buildings 3/2 and 2/8, refer to page
2 of the Development package).
7. Consider additional walkways around buildings 2/1 and 2t4 for convenience of residents
wanting access to pool/spa/courtyard areas on-site. In addition, consider moving the
walkway at the south end of Building 2/3 to access the parking lot (refer to page 2 of the
Development Plan package).
A 5-foot minimum landscape separation shall be provided between buildings, walkways,
garages, and trash enclosures (refer to page 2 and 2c of the Development Plan package).
Areas of concern will be highlighted at the Design Review Committee meeting.
Architectural Issues
Vary the patterns of the garage doors in pairs (refer to the elevations of the various Building
Types)~
DRC COMMENTS
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 3
2. Add decorative architectural elements such as cornice details, window sills/trim, etc.
3. A Noise Impact Study, prepared for Tentative Tract16000 by LSA Associates, has identified
Mitigation Measures, which are required to mitigate noise generated by traffic on perimeter
streets. The applicants will be required to accomplish the following:
Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) is required for apartment units,
which would be exposed to potential traffic noise levels between 60 and 65 dBA Ldn.
All buildings facing the project perimeterwould be subject to this mitigation measure.
b. In addition to the mechanical ventilation system, those buildings facing Church
Street may be subject to noise levels exceeding 65 dBA Ldn and will be required to
include double-panned windows and weatherstripping seals for additional noise
mitigation.
c. A 5-foot high sound barrier is recommended for second floor balconies of afl
apartment units located within the 60 dBA Ldn noise contour. This mitigation
measure would apply to second floor balconies of all units facing the perimeter of the
project. Discuss with the applicant the various options available to accomplish this
mitigation measure, including increased wall heights and the use of plexi-glass.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval subject to revised plans returning on Consent Calendar, prior to
scheduling for Planning Commission.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Debra Meier
Committee discussion followed the outline of issues as identified in the staff report, therefore action
comments will relate directly to the items listed above. The Committee recommended that the
appropriate modifications be made in cooperation with staff and that the project be forwarded to
Planning Commission.
Perimeter Site Issues
Where perimeter walls are proposed, the Committee suggested that the applicant increase
berming against the wail to limit the exposed wall height to 6 feet.
2. At the corner of East Elm Avenue and Spruce Street, the Committee recommended that
staff work with the applicant to maximize the width of landscaping between sidewalk and
wall. Verify that the plan reflects the standard sidewalk corner cutoff (as required by
Engineering Department) the area of concrete at the corner seems excessive.
DRC COMMENTS
T'T 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 4
3. The gated pedestrian access points to the perimeter of the project are adequate as
proposed by the applicant.
Interior Site E)esiqn Issues
In order to increase the total number of recreational amenities required by the Development
Code, the applicant proposed to provide one expanded size tot lot, rather than scattered
smaller tot lots. The Committee concurred with the proposal and directed the applicant to
work with staff to modify the tot lot area to approximately 40 feet by 60 feet in area (an oval
configuration was suggested). This expanded tot lot will result in increasing the amenity
count to 10, as required.
2. The driveway width at the entry to the leasing office will be expanded to 26 feet.
3. Two trash enclosures wirl be shifted to be adjacent to garage buildings as suggested by
staff. The applicant agreed to be careful not to create small areas that could not be
appropriately landscaped due to inadequate space, retaining wall or building footings
interfering with landscaping and similar constraints that occur within very small areas.
All landscaped planter islands must be 6 feet outside dimension as required by
Development Code standards.
5. The applicant agreed to the use of decorative concrete in front of garage doors. In addition,
the Committee recommended that the dimension in front of garage doors must be either less
than 8 feet, or greater than 18 feet, to control vehicle parking in front of garage doors unless
appropriate space is available.
6. In reference to the tot lot location, refer to item ¢¢1 above.
7. Additional walkways will be carried around the ends of Buildings 2/1 and 2/4.
8. As previously noted, the applicant agreed to be careful not to create small ~reas that could
not be appropriately landscaped due to inadequate space, retaining wall or building footings
interfering with landscaping and similar constraints that occur within very small areas.
Architectural Issues
1. Garage door patterns must vary in pairs, including color and gird pattern.
2. The Committee found the apartment buildings to be acceptable in style, color, detail, and
design~ The Committee, however did recommend that the leasing office and recreation
building needed additional architectural detailing, and that the two buildings should contain
complimentary design elements and features. The applicant was requested to work with
staff to provide the revised plans.
3. The applicant will provide a detail of how the use of plexiglass can be incorporated into the
design of the balcony wall and railing details in order to comply with mitigation of the Noise
Study.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Tentative Tract 16000 and Design Review 99-13
2. Related Files:
3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99-13 -
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots
for condominium purposes; along with Design Review of 306 apartment units, located within
the Terra Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue,
Church Street, and East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development
density is within the Medium High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) -
APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
4. Project Sponsor°s Name and Address:
David Lewis, Managing Director
Lewis Apartment Communities
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland CA 91786
5. General Plan Designation: High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the
Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP)
6. Zoning: This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the
TVCP. The proposed net density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre which is in the range of
Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the
TVCP subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council.
The standards of the Medium High Residential district will apply to the proposed
development.
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 16000 is located in the
southwesterly quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community, Existing residential and
commercial development surround much of this quadrant. Immediately north of Tentative
Tract 16000 is Spruce Avenue Park and existing apartments (Tract 12673); lying southerly
of Tentative Tract 16000 is a portion of an undeveloped parcel currently zoned High
Residential and the Town Center Square; to the east is an undeveloped parcel designated
Medium High Residential; and finally located westerly of Tentative Tract 1600 is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Ptanning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Dan Coleman, Planning Division (909) 477-2750
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
(X) Land Use and Planning (X) Transportalion/Circulation (X) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources (X) Utilities and Service Systems
(X) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (X) Aesthetics
(X) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
(X) Air Quality (X) Noise (X) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) ~ find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation IncoFporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
t ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed: /Debr~er AI'~C P'
Contract Planner
June 22, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
I
1. ~ND USE AND P~NNING. Would the proposa/:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
b) Oonfiict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdi~ion
over the project? () ( ) ( ) (x)
c} Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a) This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the
Terra Vista Community Plan; however, the proposed net density of Tentative Tract
16000 is 19.36 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range of Medium High
Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This type of density adjustment is
permitted by the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval by the
Planning Commission and the City Council. As a result, this project will also require
action by the City Council, as well as the Planning Commission.
I
I
Ip~'"~'l~ I
~.u, ~r~ Supp~.~t~ ~nform4.,on ~, Is~n~ I M.~.~ ITM I
2. POPU~TION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.'
a) Cumulatively exceed o~cial regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial graph in an area either
dire~ly or indirectly (e.g., through praje~s in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 4
I
"s~'~e' m~'d Sugo°n~g Inf°nm~t~°n S°un:~': I~°~n~'Ily I Un~,. L~
Is~ Iu~ Is~ I ~ I
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, incJuding liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
~ Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Commenb:
f) The topography of the site will be modified by grading and construction. The impact
of grading will have minimal impact on the surrounding area due to the fact that all
perimeter streets and infrastructure are already existing. The Tujunga-Delhi
association is of relatively loose texture which can result in wind erosion. On-site
grading will be performed under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer. The
resulting impact will not be significant.
g) The General Plan (Figure V-2) indicates that the site located within the Tujunga-
Delhi soil association. The Tujunga-Delhi association may also have soil bearing
capabilities that could limit some development. Structures proposed on this soil type
are permitted only after a site specific soils investigation has been performed that
indicates that the soils can adequately support the weight of the proposed structure.
Standard Conditions of Approval will require a site specific soils report for review by
the Building and Safety Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. The
resulting impact will not be significant.
4. WATER. ~11 the proposal result in;
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pa~erns,
or the rate and amount of sudace water runoff? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 5
I I s~.."<.~
I I Imp,IK~
/P°m~=~y I Un~s.
,.,..,,,~ s~ ~.~ ~.: Is~ I M~ Is~ I ~ I
b) Exposure of people or properly to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
0 Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through dire~ additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater othe~ise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hard scape proposed.
All ranoff will be conveyed to existing drainage facilities which have been designed
to handle the flows, The impact is not considered significant.
There are no special flood hazard areas within or near the proje~ site. NO IMPACT.
e) The project wil~ not alter the course or direction of water movement. Sudace runoff
currently reaching the site fromm off-site areas will be conveyed to existing drainage
facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. NO IMPACT.
I Img.lcl
~**ue. ~ S~ ~m~ ~. S~ I ~em~ Is~ I No
5. AIR QUALI~. Wou/~ t~e propose/:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 6
Unles,
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Create objectionable odors2 ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The short term and long term air quality impacts were addressed in the certified EIR
for the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, construction of a project of this
size will exceed SCAQM D thresholds dudng grading activities for PM~0 and NOx, and
may also exceed SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts)
for NOx. The proposed project represents only a fraction of the total emissions of
NOx in the County, therefore this impact is less than significant. The following
mitigation measures will be required to reduce short term construction
impacts to a less-than significant level:
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used
ohsire based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The
Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended; thereby, decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles ;~nd equipment
operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and
kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation
of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each
day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust
from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 7
such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the
day, and whenever wind exceeds 1.5 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of
the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
$) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated
natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and
coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as
high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating
applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag
or sponge.
I I
I~t~ I Un~
~,.~..~ s~ ~.~ ~, Is~ I ~"~ Is~ I
6. T~NSPORTATION/CIRCU~TION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
b) H~ards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp cu~es or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
~ Conflicts with adopted policies suppoding
alternative transpotation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The project will generate additional trips due to the new construction of 306
apartment units. However, the project will not increase vehicle tdps or traffic
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 8
congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use for which street widths
were evaluated at a build-out condition. Traffic impacts were addressed in the
certified EIR prepared for the Terra Vista Planned Community. In addition, the
project proponent was required to prepare a signal warrant study for the intersection
of Church Street and West Elm Avenue. The project proponent will be required
to:
1) Pay transportation development fees prior to issuance of building
permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair contribution for area wide
improvements.
2) Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Elm and Spruce
Avenues.
b) The circulation design features conform with City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Division Street Design and Intersection Line of Sight policies. NO
IMPACT.
c) The project has adequate emergency access. NO IMPACT.
e) The required street frontage improvements will include sidewalks and/or bike lanes
in accordance with the Terra Vista Community Plan. NO IMPACT.
f) The required street frontage improvements include a bus turnout. NO IMPACT.
/ I
~,.~,,,~ s~,~,~ ~, Is~ I ~"~ Is~ I ~ I
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Woul~ lhe propo~/
~) Endangered, threatened, or r~re species or their
h~bitsts (including, but not limited to: plBnts, fish,
insects, ~nim~ls, ~nd birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)2 ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Locally designsled n~Jur~l communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, s~ge scrub h~bit~t, etc.)2 ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Wetland h~bit~t (e.g., m~rsh, rip~ri~n, ~nd
vernal pool)2 () ( ) ( ) (X)
e) WiJdlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
The project site w~s graded ~s ~ ~super p~d" in ~984. No structures, trees, or other
significant vegetation remain on the site.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 9
I
tP°~en'"~' I Un.,. LT~
8. ENERGY AND MINE~L RESOURCES. Would the
propos~k
a) Confilm with adopted energy consedation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
ine~cJent manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
I I
J J Impmc~
IP~'""~'~Iu,~.. I m.,~ I I
,.,.~.,~ s.,~,~ ~,,~,,,,~ s~.~. ts.~,. ju,~,~, Is~"~"'"I ~ I
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including. but not limited
to: oil. pesticides, chemicals. or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of -
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
I
IP°~'""'"~'I u,',~,..I ~""I I
,,~, ~ s~ ~.~ s~. IS~.~ j M,~ Is~"~ I No
! 0. NOISE. Will the proposal result in.'
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 10
Comments:
a) The primary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation corridors.
Traffic along Church Street, EIm Avenue, and Spruce Avenue is the predominant
source contributing to the ambient noise level in the area. A Noise Impact Study
was performed for the proposed project by LSA Associates dated May 3, 1999. The
ambient noise levels range from 57.5 to 63.5 dBA, Leq (A-weighted sound level,
Equivalent Continuous Noise Level). Increases in noise levels could result from
project related traffic on roads that provide access to the site. Project related long-
term vehicular trip increases are anticipated to be moderate. The incremental traffic
noise level increases would be less than significant (LSA, May 1999).
b) The proposed on-site residential dwellings would be exposed to traffic noise level
potential exceeding 60 dBA, Ldn (A-weighted sound level, Day/Night noise level)
standard in outdoor activity areas. Mitigation measures will be required. The
project proponent will be required to:
1) Provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) for all dwelling
units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) Provide building facade upgrades, such as double-paned windows and
weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling units which face Church
Street.
3) Provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the second floor balconies for
all dwelling units facing the perimeter streets.
With the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, the potential noise
impacts would be reduced to below the level of significance (LSA, May 1999).
I I s~,~.,~
I I~m~'~ -
JPo~e~t~ly J UnJ~lJ
i.......~ ~q I~e,~ ~,: IS~ J M,~,~ JTM I ~
J tm~ II~Jt~ J Imo~ [ Imp~
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government seaices in any of the following areas::
a) Fire protection2 ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmentaJ sewices? ~( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 11
Comments:
c) The project site is within the attendance boundaries of the Etiwanda School District
and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Both Districts have previously
entered into mitigation agreements for the entire Terra Vista Planned Community
and have formed a Me!lo-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund school
facilities. In addition, school impact fees are regulated by the State of California
Government Code Section 65995 et seq., wherein the City is prohibited from
denying the project based upon the adequacy of school facilities. The project site
is within walking distance of the Coyote Canyon Elementary School and the Ruth
Musser Middle School. The project proponent will be required to join the Mello-Roos
CFD; therefore, the impact would be reduced to below the level of significance.
I
/ I ~'"~"~
JP~q~ roll)'J Un~,~,l LT'~
,,,.,,,,~ S~,~,,~m~,,~ So~,. Is~"'~"~ I '~"'~""~ Is~"~-~ I ~ I
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wou/d the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
0 Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
e) The project will not result in a need for new storm drains or substantial alterations
to the master plan storm drainage. NO IMPACT.
I s.~.,.,
j Po~tt,al~ I u.~... I J~.. I I
,.~. ~ s~,~ i~.~ s~.~. J s~ J ~ JS~ J No J
AESTHETICS. Would the proposak
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 12
Comments:
c) Development of the proposed project will result in additional sources of light and
glare in the community. This impact is similar to existing development in the area
and would not result in a significant impact.
I
14. CULTU~L RESOURCES, Would the proposah
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would aftera unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Restdd existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
I I
I I ~,.~
,,~. ~ s~,~ ~, Is~ I u~ }s~ I ~ I
RECREATION. ~ou/d the proposal.'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities~
~e~ existi~ recreational oppo~unities~
Comments:
a) The proposed project will increase the demand for developed parkland in the Terra
Vista Community. The project is located immediately south of the Existing Spruce
Avenue Park, and in addition, will include conditions of approval for the development
of La Mission Park (located easterly of the project site). These park facilities are
intended to serve the needs of residents of the proposed project, as well as the
requirement established by the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 13
I I
I ~m~ I~K I Im~ I Im~
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restri~ the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate impo~ant examples of the major
periods of California hJsto~ or prehisto~? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Sho~ term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve sho~-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A sho~-term
impam on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impams that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental efteros of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the efteros of past projems, the effects of
other current proje~s, and the effects of
probable future projems.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Subs~ntial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effe~s which will cause
substantial adverse effe~s on human beings,
either directly or indiremly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(1) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
I3:49 90954967~5 t~,;IS OPERATLNG CORP PaC~ 82
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Master Environmerd~ ~ for the 196g General Plan Up~e
(SCH 11~1~8020115. certified January 4, lgSg)
(3CH i~8105'Z80~. carlfired Fe0mmy 16, lg83)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I c~*tify [hal. I am the epp~mt fo~ the project deecrtbed in this IniUm Study. I ,~~ that I
hawe read thi,. Initiet Study and the pmposm/mitigation mea~u~l. Further. ! have revved the
project I~erm c~propoee~e a. nd/~r horet~y egme to the propoeed mltigaeor~ mea .m~. l..o evo~ ~d
afl~:t~ or mRi~!~e the effect~ tc~e i>olnt where clearly no ~gnl~cant env~rom"nemm e~/ec~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16000 & Design Review 99-13
Public Review Period Closes: July 14, 1999
Project Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Apartment Communities
Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Terra Vista Pfanned Community. The
site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue.
Project Description: A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium purposes;
along with Design Review of 306 apartment units. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development density is within
the Medium High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077.421-55 and 60.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environmenL
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2"847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.16000, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF
16 ACRES OF LAND INTO 6 LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN
THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH
DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM
AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND 60.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract
Map No. 16000, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of Juty 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Church Street, East Elm Avenue,
and Spruce Avenue, and is presently a vineyard on-site; all perimeter streets are improved with
curb, gutter and pavement.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park; and
c. The project proposes 6 lots for condominium purposes; and
d. The project site is subject to noise levels of 65 CNEL along Church Street and can
be mitigated to acceptable levels per the Noise Study prepared for the project; and
e. The project will generate traffic trips which can be accommodated through public
street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
f. The project is consistent with the General Plan Medium-High density residential
land use designation (14-24 dwelling units per acre) with a proposed project density of 19.36
dwelling units per acre.
g. The proposed project of 306 multi-family residential dwellings is in accord with the
objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Medium-High Residential district. In
addition, the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan.
h. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the
Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building
separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report.
i. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all conditions of approval
will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway
improvements adjacent to the site, as well as install a traffic signal at the intersection of Elm Avenue
and Spruce Avenue.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the tentative tract wirl not conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports incfuded for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
proiect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c.. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Engineerin.q Division
1 ) The six-lot subdivision, Tentative Tract Map No. 16000, and Development Review
99-13 are being processed concurrently by the property owner. The tract map
shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit.
2) Complete missing street improvements fronting and adjacent to the project site on
Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue including, but not limited to,
sidewalk, driveways, median island landscaping on Church Street, street trees,
and streetlights. Protect existing traffic stripping and signage, including R 26(s)
"No Stopping any Time" signs on Spruce and Church frontages.
3) Install a traffic signal at Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue.
4) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of building
permits for the 13th apartment building within the project. Tl~e park design,
including grading, shall be subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation
Commission, prior to final map approval..
5) To reflect new or relocated improvements, existing street improvement plan No.
1306, 1342, 1449, and 1522-L shall be revised and/or new plans prepared by a
registered civil engineer. Plan check fees will be required.
6) Coordinate with Cucamonga School District on bus stop locations and "Suggested
Route to School" maps.
Environmental Mitigation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to issuance of
building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair contribution for area-wide
improvements.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
2) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Elm and
Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
1 ) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) for all
dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-parted
windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dweIling units which face
Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the second floor
balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter streets.
AIR QUALITY
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site
based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction
Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that
all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in
lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include
a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog
season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should
be extended; thereby, decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to
minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time~
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing and transit
incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained or'site and kept to
a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut
or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent
dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities
cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or' sprinkler systems shall be used to keep
all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the
site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later
morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind
exceeds 15 miles per hour.
After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the entire
area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until
the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not
occur.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut: or fill materials and/or construction debris
to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated natural
colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VQC coating, and coating transfer
or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure
(HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand
roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: '
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16000
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081,6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported
The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compriance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions, (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The foliowing steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamc~nga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the folrowing
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Tentative Tract 16000
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. fn those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 16000 (Related file: Development Review 99-13)
SUBJECT: 306 Apartment Units
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Avenue and West Elm Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT,
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909)477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Dale
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. ']'he City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's ~etter of approval, and all Standard / /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Project No TT16000
Completion Date
2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/ /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been comptied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all .,sections of the Development Code, / /
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
D. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
E. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. __/__/__
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of __/__/__
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided,
Project NO TT16000
Completion Date
F. Street Improvements
1, Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /
J Curb& J AC. J Side- j Dr're I Street J S,ree~. ] Corem I Meal,an I B,ke I O,herI
Church Street ,/
Spruce Avenue ,/
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114~ (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. ('e) R26 "No Parkin.q Anytime" siqns .
2. Improvemerit Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights .... / ...../.
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final! map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a t /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / 1
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet eutside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) C:onduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e.Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required, A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving. which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project NO. TTI6000
Comp4etlon Date
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / /
3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Loca~ residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
G. Public Maintenance Areas
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate [.andscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
H. Utilities
1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __/__/
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __/ /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
I. General Requirements and Approvals
A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covedng the estimated operating costs for all __/__/
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute, PER 91 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) __1__1__
(Increase)
a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall __/__/
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy,
Project No TT16000
Completion Date
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, / /
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3~ Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/ /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / /
inspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Other: As per NFPA 13. / /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
6. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/ /
sprinkler system.
7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
· / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / /
· / California Code Regulations Title 24. / /
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / /
· / All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. / /
Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must be / /
submitted.
10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. __/__/
11. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. / /
12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, /__/__
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: __/ /
,/ Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). __/ /
14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire __1__1
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
Project No. TT16000
Completion Date
15. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), $677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be / /
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $13200 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
16. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, / /
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 99-13, IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY
CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND 60.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application for the approval of Development
Review No. 99-13, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subiect Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of' the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows::
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue, and is presently a vineyard. The perimeter streets are improved v~th curb, gutter,
and pavement; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park; and
c. The project is located within the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per
acre); however, the proposed density of 19 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium-High
Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This
flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the
Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium-High District will apply to the
proposed development.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13- LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
Planninq Division
1) All pertinent conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval for
Tentative Tract 16000 shall apply.
2) Provide enhanced paving material at the gated entry areas as depicted
on the approved conceptual landscape plan. Enhanced paving
surfaces shall also be used in the area in front of the garages.
3) Berm the street scape landscaping along any perimeter wall for a
maximum exposed wall height of 6 feet from finished surface along the
streetscape.
All retaining walls used throughout the project shall be decorative
surface to compliment the building design.
5) Provide a reduced set (approximately 11 inches X 17inches) of the
entire development plan for Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
6) Provide revised Terra Vista Illustrative Master Plan (i.e., full size
blueprint) to include the subject project for Planning Division records,
prior to plan check to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
7) The garage entrance depths will be dimensioned at either less than 8
feet, or greater than 18 feet. Less than 18 feet requires an automatic
door opener.
8) The architectural treatment (pattern and color) of the garage doors
shall vary by pairs.
9) Recreational amenities (and the related points given) in accordance
with Development Code Section 17.08.040.H are as follows:
Recreation Building (1); pool/spa (1); outdoor entertainment area and
media center located at the Leasing Pavilion (1); spa/courtyard (1);
three large open lawn areas (3); BBQ nodes located throughout-the
project (2); and a single expanded tot lot with multiple play equipment
(approximately 40 feet X 60 feet in area) (1) = 10 TOTAL amenities.
10) Redesign elevations, as necessary, to comply with recommendations
of noise study for sound attenuation purposes.
Engineering Division
1) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed prior to issuance
of building permits for the 13th apartment building within the project.
The park design, including grading, shall be subject to approval by the
Parks and Recreation Commission, prior to final map approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to
issuance of building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair
contribution for area-wide improvements.
2) The developer shall construct a traff~c signal at the intersection of East
Elm and Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
t) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning
system) for all dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-
paned windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling
units which face Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the
second floor balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter
streets.
AIR QUALITY
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall
length of the construction period should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4)The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust 'from leaving the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities cease.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed;
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so
that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller,
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad BuIler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Design Review 99-13
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamor~ga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including'any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Design Review 99-13
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented,
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-13
SUBJECT: 306 Apartments (related file Tentative Tract 16000)
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Street and West Elm Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Complellon Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any' such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planher's letter of approval, and all Standard / /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if t /
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __/ /
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra VistaCommunity Plan.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / I
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shaIl be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site. plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / 1
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved __/ /
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and f /
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be I /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, betming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ....... f I
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior
to the issuance of building permits.
12. For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the
Development Code.
13. For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space __/ /
shall be provided.
14. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the
Development Code.
SC - ~14~9 2
Prolec~ No DR 99-13
Completion Date
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / /
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feel
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / 1
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / /
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
5. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth
from back of sidewalk.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho t /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shail provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
r~ght-of-way.
7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 per. cent of
the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle
storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a
minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required
exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off
to the higher whole number.
F. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,
2. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided / /
w,thin the project: 5 % - 48-inch box or larger 5 % - 36-inch box or larger, 20 % - 24- inch
box or larger, 70 % - 15-gallon, and 0 % - 5 gallon.
SC - 6.,t 4rg9 3
q
Project No DR 99-13
~ompletton Date
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking __/__/__
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 / /
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. S~o,pe planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / ..../
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible / /
for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted
areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and
debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,
fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall
be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / /
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / /
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of __/ /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not ,a part of this approval. __/ /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior
to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior
to issuance of building permits.
Prolect No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
H. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the __/ /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriater, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and;or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits, Said program shall identify the. reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __/ /
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: __/ /
a Site/Plot Plan;
Foundation Plan;
Floor Plan;
d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearty identified on the
outside of all plans.
SC * 6zl 4.~9 5
Project NO, DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. i t
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Buffding and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to __I /
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide
a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3~ Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and / /
prior to issuance of buitding permits.
4. Construction activity sha~l not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public __/ /
counter).
6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department __/ /
for approval.
L. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s).
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.
4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table
5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. __/ /
6. Roofing materials shall be Class "A."
SC - 6~14/99 6
/
Project No DR 99-13
Completion Date
7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A / /
8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. / I
9. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the / /
construction type shall be V-1 Hour.
10. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour / /
fire-resistive construction.
11. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. I I
'I2. Provide method of airborne and impact sound transmission control between dwelling units. / /
13. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. t /
M. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to .... / / ........
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits
4. ^ separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for __/ /
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by __1 /
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of / /
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
sc. e~ am 7
Project No DR 99.13
Completion Date
O. Street Improvements
Construct tt~e following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __/__/__
Curb & A.C, Side- Drive Sireel Street Cornm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutlet Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
E. Elm Avenue ,/ / ,/ e
Church Street
Spruce Avenue
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) R26 "No Parkinq Anytime" sicins.
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights __/__/
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and __ I__
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction __/__
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shafl be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e.Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during constructiota Street or lane CIDsure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project No DR gg-13
Completion Date
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /__/
installed to City Standards, except for singte family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__/
3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in __/ /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with __/__/
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
P. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
Q. Utilities
1. The devegoper shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __1__1__
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits. whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /__/__
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute Per 91 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) __/__/ .
(~ncrease)
a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnet prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
/?5.
Project NO. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, f f
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/ /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / /
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / /
inspection.
6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/__/
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as
woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled
stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is
adequate for proposed operations.
7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/__/
sprinkler system.
8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / /
,," California Code Regulations Title 24. __/ /
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: __/__/
v' All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. __/__/__
v' Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must __/ /
be submitted.
10. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. / /
11. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear / /
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements.
12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, __/__/__
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
,/ Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). __/__/__
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire /
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
15. A tenant use tetter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety
Division for the proper form letter.
16. $132.00 Fire District fee(s),$677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per"plan page" microfilm fee will be /
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance. °'
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, /
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Lighting
1~ All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/ /
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development,
2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / /
U. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. / /
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be instarled on all entrance doors, If windows are within / /
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
Security Fencing
1. When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since / /
fire and law enforcement can access these devices.
W. Windows
1. AH sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted / /
from frame or track in any manner.
X. Building Numbering
Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2.. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with / /
vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address
numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so
indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign
Permit and approval by the Planning Division.
SC - E,/14/c~
RESOLUT,ON NO. 97- ! 77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO.16000, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 16 ACRES OF LAND INTO
6 LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY
CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND
60.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No.~ 16000, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. Following conclusion of
said hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution 99-69 approving Tentative Tract
16000.
3. On the 4th day of August 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
concluded their review of Tentative Tract 16000.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting on August 4, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Church Street, East Elm Avenue,
and Spruce Avenue, and is presently a vineyard on-site; all perimeter streets are improved with
curb, gutter and pavement.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existing
Term Vista Business Park; and
c. The project proposes 6 lots for condominium purposes; and
/
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
August 4, 1999
Page 2
d. The project site is subject to noise levels of 65 CNEL along Church Street and can
be mitigated to acceptable levels per the Noise Study prepared for the project; and
e. The project will generate traffic trips which can be accommodated through public
street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein.
f. The project is consistent with the General Plan Medium-High density residential
land use designation (14-24 dwelling units per acre) with a proposed project density of 19.36
dwelling units per acre.
g. The proposed project of 306 muiti-family residential dwellings is in accord with the
objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Medium-High Residential district. In
addition, the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan.
h. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the
Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building
separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report.
i. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all conditions of
approval will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are
required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site, as
well as install a traffic signal at the intersection of Elm Avenue and Spruce
Avenue.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and the Terra. Vista Community Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
August 4, 1999
Page 3
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse
effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Engineering Division
1) The six-lot subdivision, Tentative Tract Map No. 16000, and
Development Review 99-13 are being processed concurrently by the
property owner. The tract map shall be recorded prior to issuance of
a building permit.
2) Complete missing street improvements fronting and adjacent to the
project site on Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue
including, but not limited to, sidewalk, driveways, median island
landscaping on Church Street, street trees, and streetlights. Protect
existing traffic stripping and signage, including R 26(s) "No Stopping
any Time" signs on Spruce and Church frontages..
3) Install a traffic signal at Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue.
4) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed prior to issuance
of building permits for the 13th apartment building within the project.
The park design, including grading, shall be subject to approval by the
Parks and Recreation Commission, prior to final map approval.
5) To reflect new or relocated improvements, existing street improvement
plan No. 1306, 1342, 1449, and 1522-L shall be revised and/or new
plans prepared by a registered civil engineer. Plan check fees will be
required.
6) Coordinate with Cucamonga School District on bus stop locations and
"Suggested Route to School" maps.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
August 4, 1999
Page 4
Environmental Mitigation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to
issuance of building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair
contribution for area-wide improvements.
2) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East
Elm and Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
1) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning
system) for all dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-
parted windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling
units which face Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the
second floor balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter
streets.
AIR QUALITY
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the
overall length of the construction period should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4)The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and
to create a crust after each day's activities cease..
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
August 4, 1999
Page 5
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is
completed; the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated
immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or
otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel,
spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16000
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 2108I .6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Tentative Tract 16000
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and repod on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT' #: Tentative Tract 16000 (Related file: Development Review 99-13)
SUBJECT: 306 Apartment Units
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Avenue and West Elm Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not re~ieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __/__/__
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __I__/__
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Project No. TT16000
Completion Date
2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/__/__
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/__/__
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __/ /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/__/__
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
D. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of __/__/__
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, ~etter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant sha~l provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
E. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
Project No. TT16000
Completion Date
F. Street Improvements
1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __/__/__
Curb & A,C. Side- Drive Street Street Corem Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr, Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
E, Elm Avenue ,/ V' v' e
Church Street
Spruce Avenue, v' ,/ ./
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) R26 "No Parking Anytime" signs .
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
cl. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction __/__/__
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No~ 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on al~ corners of intersections per City __/__/__
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shail remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project NO TT16000
Completion Date
Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/__/__
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__/__
3.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with /__/__
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
G. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/__/
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
H. Utilities
1. '1'he developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
I. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute, PER 91 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) /__/__
(Increase)
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __1__1
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the buildeddeveloper and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
Project NO. T'r16000
Completion Da~e
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __/__/__
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/__/__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final __/__/
inspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Other: As per NFPA 13. / /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics ma,nufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
5. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/__/__
sprinkler system.
7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/ /__
,/ California Code Regulations Title 24. __/ /__
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
· / All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22.
Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must be
submitted.
10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. /__/__
11. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards.
All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, __/__/__
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
,x Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s).
14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire /__/
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
Project No, TT16000
Completion Date
15. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), $677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be __/__/__
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
16. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, __/ /__
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
SC - ~/14/99 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.
99-13, IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH
DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM
AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND 60.
A. Recitals..
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application for the approval of Development
Review No. 99-13, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On, the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application. Following conclusion of said hearings, the
Planning Commission adopted its Resolution 99-70 approving the application.
3. On the 4th day of August 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
concluded their review of DR 99-13.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting on August 4, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue, and is presently a vineyard. The perimeter streets are improved with curb, gutter,
and pavement; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park; and
c. The project is located within the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per
acre); however, the proposed density of 19 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium-High
Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This
flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the
Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium-High District will apply to the
proposed development.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
August 4, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan;
and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse
effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
August 4, 1999
Page 3
Planning Division
1) All pertinent conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval for
Tentative Tract 16000 shall apply.
2) Provide enhanced paving material at the gated entry areas as
depicted on the approved conceptual landscape plan. Enhanced
paving surfaces shall also be used in the area in front of the garages.
3) Berm the street scape landscaping along any perimeter wall for a
maximum exposed wall height of 6 feet from finished surface along the
streetscape.
4) All retaining walls used throughout the project shall be decorative
surface to compliment the building design.
5) Provide a reduced set (approximately 11 inches X 17 inches) of the
entire development plan for Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
6) Provide revised Terra Vista Illustrative Master Plan (i.e., full size
blueprint) to include the subject project for Planning Division records,
prior to plan check to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
7) The garage entrance depths will be dimensioned at either less than 8
feet, or greater than 18 feet. Less than 18 feet requires an automatic
door opener.
8) The architectural treatment (pattern and color) of the garage doors
shall vary by pairs.
9) Recreational amenities (and the related points given) in accordance
with Development Code Section 17.08.040.H are as follows:
Recreation Building (1); pool/spa (1); outdoor entertainment area and
media center located at the Leasing Pavilion (1); spa/courtyard (1);
three large open lawn areas (3); BBQ nodes located throughout the
project (2); and a single expanded tot lot with multiple play equipment
(approximately 40 feet X 60 feet in area) (1) = 10 TOTAL amenities.
10) Redesign elevations, as necessary, to comply with recommendations
of noise study for sound attenuation purposes.
Engineering Division
1 ) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed prior to issuance
of building permits for the 13th apartment building within the project.
The park design, including grading, shall be subject to approval by the
Parks and Recreation Commission, prior to final map approval.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
August 4, 1999
Page 4
Environmental Mitigation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to
issuance of building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair
contribution for area-wide improvements.
2) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East
Elm and Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
1) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning
system) for all dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-
paned windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling
units which face Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the
second floor balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter
streets.
AIR QUALITY
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the
overall length of the construction period should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4)The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities cease.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
August 4, 1999
Page 5
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler' systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed;
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so
that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller,
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Design Review 99-13
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the proiect.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Design Review 99-13
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-13
SUBJECT: 306 Apartments (related file Tentative Tract 16000)
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Street and West Elm Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Complefiort D',te
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __/ /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if .I.ml~
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __/__/__
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra VistaCommunity Plan.
Project No, DR 9g-13
Comptetion Date
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval sha~l be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/ /__
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved __/__/
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, betming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers sha~l be placed in underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units sha~i be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior
to the issuance of building permits.
12. For multiple, family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the ,/ /
Development Code.
13. For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space __/__/__
shall be provided.
For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the
Development Code.
Prolect No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __/__/__
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts __/__/__
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. A~I parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided __/__/__
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
5. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth __/__/__
from back of sidewalk.
6. Plans for an, y security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of
the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle
storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a
minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required
exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off
to the higher whole number.
F. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/ /__
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided __/__/__
within the project: 5 % - 48-inch box or larger 5 % - 36-inch box or larger, 20 % - 24- inch
box or larger, 70 % - 15-gallon, and 0 % - 5 gallon.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / /
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August :21.
4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one __/__/__
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in verticar height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 __/__/__
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq, ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover, In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible
for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted
areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and
debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,
fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall
be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. __/ /__
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior
to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior
to issuance of building permits.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
H. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures, The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
in those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: I__1__
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. __/__/__
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. __/__/__
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shal~ not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be __/__/__
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and a~l other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide
a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and __/
prior to issuance of buifding permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __/__/__
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public
counter).
6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department
for approval.
New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2, Provide cornpliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s).
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.
Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table __/__/__
5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls.
6. Roofing materials shall be Class "A."
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance wiih UBC Table 5-A
8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. __/__/__
9. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the __/__/__
construction type shall be V-1 Hour.
10. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour __/__/__
fire-resistive construction.
11. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906.
12. Provide method of airborne and impact sound transmission control be[ween dwelling units.
13. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. __/__/__
M. Grading
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __/__/__
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __/ /
perform such work,
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fi~t, The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, {909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. /__/__
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
Project NO. DR 99-13
Comj~letlon Date
O. Street Improvements
1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __1__1__
Curb & A,C. Side- Drive Street Street Corem Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trait Island Trait
E Elm Avenue / ,/ / e
Church Street ,/
Spruce Avenue ,/
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and ovedays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) R26 "No Parkinq Anytime" signs.
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's ()ffice in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction __ /
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e.Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f~ Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __1__1__
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
3.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with __/__/__
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for atl project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
P. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/__/__
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
Q. Utilities
1. The developer shall be responsibfe for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /__/__
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to finaf map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all __/__/
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute Per 91 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b)
(Increase)
a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __/__/__
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/__/__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6oinch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final __/__/__
inspection.
6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15.
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as
woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled
stock~ etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is
adequate for proposed operations.
7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/__/__
sprinkler system.
8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/ /__
,/ California Code Regulations Title 24. __/ /__
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
,/ All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. __/__/
,/ Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must
be submitted.
10. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. __/__/__
11. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear __/__/__
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements.
12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, __/__/__
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
v' Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). __1__1__
Project No. DR gg-13
Completion Date
14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire __/ /__
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information,
15. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval, Contact the Fire Safety
Division for the proper form letter.
16 $132.00 Fire District fee(s).~677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance.
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
"Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909} 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Lighting
1. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/ /__
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. __1__1
U. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
V. Security Fencing
When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since
fire and law enforcement can access these devices.
W. Windows
All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted
from frame or track in any manner.
X. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with __/__/__
vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address
numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so
indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign
Permit and approval by the Planning Division.
sc .~4~ 12
CI'TY OF RANCI-]O CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
- An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the
southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue -
APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan
Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use
Permit 99-08.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 -
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land
use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located
on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09.
Related files: Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-
08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to
change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan
Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Histodc Landmark
Designation 99-02.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 -
.CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a
two-story residential care facility for the eldedy totaling approximately 53,192 square
feet in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on
approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street- APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review
98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment
99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends continuance of General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District
Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08 to assure the widest opportunity for
participation in the neighborhood meeting.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LD 99-02, GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08
August 4, 1999
Page 2
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On July 7, 1999, the City Council conducted a public hearing to review the above-described project.
During the public hearing some residents expressed concerns about the proposed project. Of
primary concern to the residents was: traffic, compatibility of the project with the single family
neighborhood and impact on property values. The City Council continued the project for one-month
and directed staff to facilitate a neighborhood meeting between the residents in the general vicinity
and the project proponent. Staff, therefore, facilitated a neighborhood meeting on July 22, 1999.
The meeting was separated into two parts in order to provide an opportunity for all residents to
participate and provide feedback in the neighborhood meeting. The first part was an "Open House"
from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. The second part was a
general meeting between 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. in the pool area of the Castle Gate residential
development. A copy of the notice is attached for reference.
Since the Thursday July 22, 1999, neighborhood meeting City Staff received new inquiries from
additional property owners indicating that they needed more information regarding the project.
Some of these property owners indicated that they were not available to attend the neighborhood
meeting on Thursday night. It is for this reason that City staff is recommending that the City Council
continue the hearing for two weeks to the August 18, 1999, meeting to include the additional
property owners and all of the addresses included in the petition form in order to assure the widest
participation in the neighborhood meeting.
Res pectfu I~,~su b m jibed,
Bra~~' ~er'~ City Planner
BB:SS:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Neighborhood Meeting Notice Dated July 15, 1999
Exhibit "B - Developer's Informational Packet
Exhibit "C" - City Council Report dated July 7, 1999, regarding LD 99-02
Exhibit "D" - City Council Report dated July 7, 1999, regarding GPA 99-02,
DDA 99-02, and CUP 99-08
Resolution approving LD 99-02
Resolution approving GPA 99-02
Ordinance approving DDA 99-02
Resolution approving CUP 99-08
T H E C I T Y O F
D A N CH0 C 'U CAkl O N G A
July 15, 1999
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
Dear Property Owner:
The Planning Division will be facilitating a Neighborhood Meeting on July 22, 1999 between
Curry Brandaw Architects and property owners from the general vicinity of the 19th Street and
Hermosa Avenue. The Neighborhood Meeting will serve as a forum to discuss specific issues
(raised during the July 7, 1999 City Council Meeting) related to the proposed construction of a
Residential Care Facility located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue.
The Neighborhood Meeting will consist of two parts. The first part is an 'Open House" to be held
from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Rains Conference Room. The
purpose of the "Open House' is for you to meet with the developer on a one-to-one basis and to
review the plans for the Residential Care Facility. The second part is a general meeting to be held
from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the Pool Area of the Castle Gate residential development
located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue.
We hope that you will take this opportunity to review the development plans for the project and ask
questions about the project.
If you need additional information please call me at (909) 477-2750, ext. 2255 or Curry Brandaw
Architects, at (503) 399-1090.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
SMS:mlg
Mayor William J. Alexander ~_~/_~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Duftor~
Jack Lain, AtCP, City Manager Councilmember James M Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P,O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849 "3
JOHN STUART
REAL ESTATE BROKER
6304 E. West View Drive.
Orange, Ca. 92869
714-350-7712 Fax 714-639-1129
July 21, 1999
City Council Members of Rancho Cucamonga
C/O City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91729
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I am a sales agent for a residential project called Morning Dove, which is across the street
from a Colson & Colson project called Mission Commons. Mission Commons is located
on the South West corner of Barton Road and Terracina in Redlands, California.
Mission Commons has been a very good neighbor in our community whereby they
keep a very well maintained and clean facihty. This 157- bed facility generates very
little traffic impact to the immediate neighborhood.
I have been a real estate broker since 1973 and a sales agent for Morning Dove since
December of 1998. Since I have been working at this location, I have never had a
prospective buyer or resident make a negative comment on this facility regarding it's
proximity, looks, traffic or type of business. In fact, I feel that it has been a positive
factor for home sales at this tract.
Sincerely,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~z.~ JAMES BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
': ~ ~?~ 2765 12th Street S.E. · P.O. Box 4344
Salem, OR 97302-4344
~~~, (503) 363~5969 · FAX (503) 363-5988
INCOME
October I, t998
Mr. Cliftbrd Curry
Curry Brandaw Architects
2260 McGilchrist Street, S.E.
Suite
Salem, Oregon 97302
Re: Median home value trends between 1990 and 1998 in close proximity to Holiday
Retirement projects.
Dear Mr. Curry:
At your request, I have compared Claritas, Inc. median home values within ¼ mile radius'
of four Holiday Retirement projects to city, state, and national. median home values to
determine the impact on surrounding home values of your projects. To better correlate the
data I have also included median household income data. The four projects randomly
selected are in the cities of Napa, California; Evansville, Indiana; Greenville, South
Carolina; and Richmond, Virginia. Median home values are shown for the years 1990 and
1998 as well as projections by Claritas, Inc. for 2003.
Redwood Retirement Center
2350 Redwood Road
Napa, California 94558
INCOME AND HOME VALUE CHARACTERISTICS
Historically, median household income for Napa has been close to state median
household income. In 1990, median household income for Napa was 99.05 percent of the
state figure. By 1998, Napa median household income increased slightly in relatiori to the
state to 102.69 percent of state median household income.
Mr. Clifford Curry
October 1, 1998
Page 2
Median household income fbr the one quarter mile radius of the Holiday Redwood
Retirement Center increased at a greater rate than the city. Local median household
income grew fi'om $40,980 in 1990 to $56,328 in 1998, a 37.45 percent increase. Local
median household income increased from 115.5 percent of the city in 1990 to 129.12
percent in 1998.
Median Household Income of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$70,~)00
$50,000 !1~11990
$40,000 ii1998
$30,000
$20,000 !132003
$10,~00
$0
United States California Napa 1/4/Vii. Radius of Rdwd.
Rd.
In 1990 the median home value for Napa was $174,951. This figure rose to $220,503 in
1998. This change amounts to a 26.04 increase between 1990 and 1998. 1998 median
home value in Napa is 104.9 percent of the state.
In 1990 the one quarter mile radius of the Redwood Retirement Center median home
value was below that of Napa. In 1990, local median home value was $156,799 or 89.62
percent of Napa city. Local 1998 local median home value is $210,439 or 95.44 of Napa
indicating greater appreciation than experienced for the city.
Median Home Value of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$300,000
S250,000
$200,000 -- ~ 1990
$150,000 '1 1998
$100,000 __ i132003
$50,000
$0
United States California Napa 1/4 Mi. Radius of Rdwd.
Rd.
Mr. Clifford Curry
October I, 1998
Page 3
Median ,Increase and Home Value ComParison By,National, State, Cit% And ~A Mile Radi,us Areas
C,~eral Pogulatio~ i~liln ~1ou~'~oId Income & % ~ US, ~ate, a.d ~a~r~ Mar~t
~nl Population ~ian Iio~ V~ue a % ~ US, ~ Ci~ a~ ~ ~t ~i~
,,,0 ...... [. .,,., ,,,,.,,, I
Willow Park Retirement Center
5050 Lincoln Avenue
Evansville, Indiana 47715
INCOME AND HOME VALUE CHARACTERISTICS
1990 median household income for Evansville was below median household income for
the state. In 1990, median household income for Evansville was 84.08 percent of the state
figure. By 1998, Evansville median household income slipped to 81.51 percent of state
median household income.
Median household income for the one quarter mile radius surrounding Holiday's Willow
Park Retirement Center grew from $22,940 in 1990 to $29,464 in 1998. This represents a
28.44 percent increase. This is 99.4 percent of the city of Evansville median household
inco~ne which is basically the same percentage as in 1990 at 100.0 percent.
Median Household Income of General Populalion In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$45,000 T--
$35,000 ~- .1~i1990:
$30,000
s2o,~o in2oo3 i
$15,000
$10,~00
$5,~00
$0
United States Indiana Evansville 1/4 Mi. Rad of Lincoln
In 1990 median home value for Evansville was $ 45,507. This rose to $ 57,823 in 1998.
This change amounts to a 27.06 increase between 1990 and 1998.
Mr. Clifford Curry
October 1, 1998
Page 4
Median home value in the one quarter mile radius surrounding the Willow Park
Retirement Center has approximated Evansville home values. In 1990, local median
home value was $ 45,507, 100.00 percent of Evansville value. The 1998 one quarter mile
radius median home value is $ 57,857 or 100.06 of Evansville.
Median Home Value of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$140,000
$120,000 ~
$100,000
·1990
$80,000 i · 1998
$60,000 iF12003
$40,000
$20,000 t
$0
United Stales Indiana Evansville I/4 Mi. Rad of Lincoln
General Population Median ~ovaseho~d Income & % Of US, State, City and ~ Mile Radius
~neral Popuriah M~ian Itome Vahe 1% Of US. State, O~ and ~ ~le ~us
Haywood Estates
1180 Haywood Road
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
INCOME AND HOME VALUE CHARACTERISTICS
Historically, the median household income for Greenville has been below the median
household income for the state. In 1990, median household income for Greenville was
91.95 percent of the state figure. By 1998, Greenville median household income had
increased in relation to the state to 94.92 percent of state median household income.
Median household income for the one quarter mile radius surrounding Holiday's
Haywood Estates Retirement Center increased from $35,808 in 1990 to $50,555 in 1998.
This represents a 41.18 percent increase. This is 153.8 percent of the Greenville 1998
median household income which reflects an increase up from 148.0 percent in 1990.
Mr. Clifford Curry'
October I, 1998
Page 5
Median Household Income of Genera'Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$70,000 l
$6o,o0o ~
1550,000 ~' ila1990
iS40,000 11998
$3o,ooo [n2oo~
$20,000
$0
United States South Carolina Greenville 1/4 Mi. Rad.
Haywood Rd.
In 1990 the median home value fbr Greenville was $ 68,688. This figure rose to $ 93,783
in 1998. This change amounts to a 36.53 increase between 1990 and 1998.
Median home value in the one quarter mile radius surrounding Haywood Estates
Retirement Center is above Greenville home values. In 1990, the median home value was
$132,031, 192.22 percent of Greenville value. The difference between the local and city
median home value increased slightly by 1998 to $183,928 or 196.12 percent of
Greenville.
Median Home Value of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
.s2so,0oo
$200,000 L
i$~50,000 ~-
i$1oo,ooo
1212003
$50,000,
SO
United States South Carolina Greenville I/4 Mi. Rad.
Haywood Rd.
~n~al Po~lalion M~iau Ho~ Value & V* Of US. Stale,
2~3 sns.~,
Mr. Clifford Curry
October 1, 1998
Page 6
The Virqinian
300 Twinddqe Lane
Richmond, Virginia 23235
INCOME AND HOME VALUE CHARACTERISTICS
Median household income for Richmond is below median household income for the state.
In 1990, median household income for Richmond Was 70.80 percent of the state figure. In
1998, Richmond median household income is 67.08 percent of state median household
income.
Median household income for the one quarter mile radius of The Virginian Retirement
Center increased at a greater rate than the city. Local median household income grew
from $43,958 in 1990 to $54,791 in 1998. This represents a 24.64 percent increase.
i Mediait Household Income of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$70,000 1 I
$40,000 !l 1998
$30,000
i$20,000 1=]2003
!$10,000
$0
United States Virginia Richmond I/4 Mi. Radius
Twinridge
In 1990 median home value for Richmond was $ 66,631. This figure rose to $ 81,358 in
1998. This change amounts to a 22.10 increase between 1990 and 1998.
The Virginian one quarter mile radius median home value is above Richmond. In 1990,
local median home value was $ 95,238, 142.93 percent of Richmond value. The
relationship between local and city median home value remained similar with 1998 local
median home value at $115,500 or 141.97 percent of Richmond.
Mr. Clifford Curry
October 1, 1998
Page 7
Median Home Value of General Population In 1990, 1998, & 2003
$140,000
~$I20,000
151041,000
$80,000 1~!1990
$60,000 · 1998
$40,000 ,:n2005i
$20,000
$0
United States Virginia Richmond 1/4 Mi. Radius
Twinridge
General Population Median Household Income & % Of US, State~ City and ~ Mile
200.3[ $42,7'46 100.0%
General Population Median Home Value & % Of IJS~ Star% City and ~A Mile Radius
2003[ $115~617 I~.0% [ ~16: ~ ~'/.:
SUMMARY
The data for Napa indicates that the quarter mile area surrounding your facility attracted
those with higher median household income which changed the character of the
neighborhood to one of higher median household income. This resulted in home values
increasing not only in total dollar amount but in relationship to their value to the city.
For Evansville, Indiana, no significant change occurred between 1990 and 1998.
Household income for the quarter mile surrounding your property remained in relatively
constant position to the city of Evansville. Home values also remained relatively similar
although increasing in total dollar amount.
For Greenville, South Carolina, between 1990 and 1998 the one quarter mile radius
median household income increased from 148 to 153.8 percent of the city. Home values
appreciated more rapidly than the city in the quarter mile surrounding area. In relationship
to the city home values in 1990 were 192.2 percent. By 1998 they were at 196.1 percent.
Mr. Clifford Curry
October 1, 1998
Page 8
For Richmond, Virginia median household income in the one quarter mile area
surrounding your retirement facility increased from $43,958 in 1990 which was 186.1
percent of the Richmond median household income to $54,791 or 196.2 percent of
Richmond. Although median household income increased greater than that for the city,
median home value remained relatively flat in relationship to the city as a whole although
increasing in total dollar amount from $95,238 to $115,500. It remained relatively
constant as a percentage of the median household income for Richmond at 142.9 percent
in 1!;}90 and 142 percent in 1998.
Median household income and median home value data from Claritas, Inc., a national
demographic survey company indicate no negative impact on home values or erosion in
median household income for residents in the one quarter mile surrounding area to
Holiday Retirement projects. This corresponds to my experience as an appraiser of this
property type. My office has been involved in the appraisal of over 2,000 retirement
facilities throughout the United States. In general these facilities are an asset to the local
neighborhood. I have never seen a Holiday Retirement project that detracted from
surrounding home value. It is my experience that the reverse is more likely which is
supported by the Claritas, Inc. data presented.
If you have questions call me.
Sincere~~
JDB/vh
'Curry Brandaw Architects
PARTNERSHIP
Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Holiday Retirement Corp.
2250 McGilchrist St. SE, Suite 200
Salem, Oregon
2260 McGilchrist Street SE, Suite 100 ,- Salem, Oregon 97302 ,, Phone 503.399-1090 ,, Fax 503.399-0565
Curry Brandaw Architects
Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence
Rancho Cucamonga, California
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
Our current proposal has been carefully designed to integrate into the
neighborhood. Neighborhood benefits of our use at this location include:
· Additional Open Space
The current zoning allows up to 40% lot coverage. Our proposal is 23% lot
coverage and over 50% landscaped open space.
· Additional Setbacks
A majority of the building is setback in excess of 100' from 19th Street. This is
in contrast to typical setbacks of 20'-30' that would exist in a conventional
residential development.
· RetaininR ExistinR Historic House
The existing residence would be designated a historic structure and
incorporated into the development as a clubhouse. A majority of the exiting
mature trees would also be saved. A conventional residential development
would likely not save this structure.
~, ~xi{stina topo(.:lraph¥ lowers perceived buildina height
The building would be lowered ap~prtho~mately 10'-13' below the ground level
of the Castle Gate homes along 19 Street. This would effectively lower the
impact of our two story building.
TRAFFIC
Detailed parking information specific to our proposal is included in the attached
narrative~ Comparisons to neighboring developments and allowed uses as they
relate to our proposal follow.
The Castle Gate development, which is located across 19th Street to the north of
our site, is zoned Low Medium, this allows for 4 - 8 units per acre. Based on
Institute of Transportation Engineers "Tdp Generation" report a single family
residence has an average trip generation of 10 trips/dwelling unit/day. Therefore,
the average trip generation for a 40 home development would be 200 - 400 tdps
per day as opposed to our proposal which has an average tdp generation of 210
per day.
2260 McGilchrist Street SE, Suite 100 o. 5alere, Oregon 97302 .. Phone 503.399-1090 .. Fax 503.399-0565
This property could be developed as a single family subdivision, as allowed
under the current Low Density zone, with 4 units per acre. The resulting 20
home development would generate an average 200 trips per day, which is very
close to the retirement residence proposed.
Although the number of tdps per day is similar for both the retirement and Low
Density Single Family, the real difference is in the number peak hour trips
generated. The average for single family is 2.2 peak hour tdps the retirement is
.4. This is significant when discussing traffic safety in relation to the community
and its effect on surrounding developments including Deer Creek Elementary
School.
PARKING
We would normally provide 1/2 space per suite for a Holiday facility, which in this
case would be 57 spaces. Our current site plan provides 67 spaces. Detailed
parking information specific to our proposal is provided in the concept, which
follows.
IMPACT DURING CONSTRUCTION
The site will be fenced as required by City Regulations. Site access would be
controlled to allow for enhanced safety to neighbors including school children.
Construction noise will be limited as City Code dictates.
Duration of construction for a facility this size is about 9 months from the time site
work begins to occupancy.
EFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES
Our experience has been that there is no degradation to property values in the
area of existing Holiday Retirement facilities. Enclosed is a certified appraiser's
report of four similar Holiday Retirement projects .from across the US that have
single family uses adjacent to them. One of these is from Napa, California.
Also included is a letter from a real estate broker who has been involved in single
family sales for a development adjacent to the Mission Commons facility in
Redlands, California. He states it has had a positive affect on house sales.
Project Narrative
Curry Brandaw Architects
Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence
Rancho Cucamonga, California
CONCEPT
The Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence is a 114-suite facility for the
elderly. Our concept is designed for those who are stilI ambulatory, but in need
of some support. Private rooms afford the advantages of independent living
while the services included provide support, security and friendship. The private
suites include studio, one and two bedroom versions. Each is similar to an
apartment except a kitchen is not inc)uded.
Services include three prepared meals daily, housekeeping, laundering, private
bus transportation and various activities. Staff is "in house" 24 hours a day. The
monthly rent payment covers the private room, all services and utilities.
Typically our resident will be a sing(e person in their late 70's or 80's.
Approximately 10% of the rooms will be rented by couples making a total
building population of 126. Fewer than 2.5% of the residents will be driving their
TRAFFIC
To help you understand the traffic loadings, we have prepared these estimates
based on 114 suites.
10 service trips per day
8 van trips
78 resident trips (20% may have cars; 3 trips per day each)
52 visitors to residents (if 20% have visitors per day)
40 other visitors per day
24 staff trips per day to and from work
This would result in an average total of 212 trips generated per day by the
retirement residence.
These numbers coincide with the published Institute of Transportation Engineers
"Trip Generation" report. This report concludes that our project would generate
only 35% of the total trips per day of a standard apartment building.
2260 McGilchrist Street SE, Suite 100 -. Salem, Oregon 97302 -. Phone 503.399-1090 -- Fax 503.399-0565
PARKING
Because most of our residents do not drive, we provide private van
transportation for their use. The van is available to take the residents to places
they need to visit, such as banks, medical offices, shopping areas, etc.
Normally we ask for a ratio of .50, or one parking space per two suites. We
have developed over 170 retirement residences. We know from our experience
that .50 parking space per suite is adequate for our residents, staff and visitors.
The reduction in parking spaces allows us to increase landscaping and open
space to create a better residential environment for our residents and adjacent
property owners.
SITE DESIGN
Neighborhood compatibility is achieved in the site planning and building design.
The wing ends and building center step down from two to one story. This
arrangement and the large building setbacks provide for privacy and a gentle
change of scale. Care is taken to minimize the impact to the existing community.
Additionally the existing house will remain and be utilized by the residence as a
clubhouse.
Our design also incorporates the use some of some existing plant material and
landscape features. This includes a portion of the southern orange grove and a
majority of stone walls. This approach helps maintain the existing character of
the site.
BUILDING DESIGN
The building construction will be wood frame with stucco and stone, and an
asphalt shingle roof.
The building interior design has common areas for a variety of uses. There .is
common dining room and kitchen for shared meals. There will be a multi-
purpose room, beauty shop, crafts room, 'IV room, lounges and an exercise
room. The circulation is organized around a central atrium.
Each room will be connected to the manager with both emergency pull cords and
voice communications. The building will be fully fire sprinklered.
The site is to be extensively landscaped. Usable outdoor spaces include
extensive lawn and a partially covered patio off the craft/exercise room. There
are paths, which connect all exits from the building and the clubhouse to provide
walking areas for the residents.
o :g eneml~c~nc~q~.doe .gs
Holiday Retirement Corp.
I I Couo~ &~y hiere, OR W~ E. Colson ~,71)~ 193 21,465 177
2 ~ ~ ~ N~vYo~ ~ Arthur P. ~n 13,626 145
(A~ ~ ~ ~ ~) ~~ ~kc ~,CA I~ B.~ 19.731 7 19,~18
~1~1~
3 16 A~ ~vl~ B~, WI ~11iam E ~y 11,579 271 4,224 113
~ 1~ 3 4 ~A~ ~ ~V~ S~ ~t~ MD ~ul ~ JoAnn, lc 18,4~ 95 I
4 H~I ~ ~IT IN~ T~OH G~ L ~an 10,211 145 4 3 ~ C~ S~ ~oN Des K4~, IA ~an G.~ut~on 16,381
5 2 ~m~ ~II~,WA ~n~lf 9~t 118 9,039 110 5 17 AL~nN~VE~C~I~. B~fi~d, WI Wi[i~mE~y 12~ 291 4,224 113
6 8 M~~ N~m Hei~lA ~4A D~ 7,518 137 6,~ 128 6 5 FL~t~ ~R~ON ~lt~ WA Dan~ ~ty IO,~9 ~28 8,248 95
7 3 ~ H~ ~ ~h, ~ · B~e A~ 7,397 101 7,~ 72 ~ 7 I I ~i~N R~t~
~ I~ B~I~, ~ W.~ ~ 9,933
~TDN Z 1
8 4 H~ MAM~ CO~TION ~a, MD Te~cc ~ G~ 7~16 31 7,2~ 29 8 6 A~ A~) ~q~ INc. ~a M~,~ Ho~ ~ 9,127 70 6.7~
9 12 ~ ~ ~ ~a~ IL Wil~m B. ~an 7,2~ 49 5,~3 35 9 8 ~ ~ ~Rm~T~ ~IL ~m B. ~an 8,107 53 ~013
I0 6 ARV ~ ~WNG I~C, ~la N[~, CA H~ ~ 7,137 ~ 6,~ 51 10 7 G~ C~ ~ 1~ ~ Ral~, ~ ~n W. I.ud~. III ~720 49 6,~7 45
I I 5 ~ ~ ~ ~, MD ~ul ~ ~h~n, Jc 7, t~ 35 6~ 32 11 25 ~ ~ ~ ~l~, OR ~11Am ~B~e, I11 5~ I~ 3,481 95
12 7 G~D ~ UF~L~ I~ ~n Rnlon, PL ~hn W. ~hni, III 6,~ 49 ~97 45 ~o~N~ I~.
~ W. ~t~ M~, 11 5,429
15 10 A~ ~t~-UFE ~l ~int, PA G~ ~ Gunn, Jr. 5,~' 15 5,520 15 15 16 S~a~ A~ U~ I~. ~irhx, VA ~ul J. Kla~n
~m~ I~ 5,~ I 69 4~29 47
16 9 HR~ N~t~, ~tA D~d I. H~). 5~157 23 5,~2 26 16 13 ~ ~ ~¥~G LLC ~hi~ KtD ~n ~ :~n 4~85 3 4~75 3
17 I~ C~i~ ~i~ ~d~e 4,873 16 4~10 17
17 A~ ~1~ I~ ~1~ KY W. ~t~ ~ul~, [I 5,0~ ~ 3~3 34
18 14 ~AiNS A~I~ ~,~ ~ J. ~1~ 4,488 ~ 4~24
18 14 ~ ~t~s ~ LLC B~Ii~,MI) J~m ~ ~ 4~S 3 4,375 3 ~ 1~" 19
19 17 PI~C~L~ S~i~VA Mo~L~i~ 4~ 79 4~7 74 19 18 ~S~v~l~ D~ Je~yL~k 4,138 40 4,116 26
21 19 S~ H~- SUN Bm~E ~, NM ~r~ ~ M~r 3,~3 ~ 3,~7 46
21 23 ~ ~ 1~ ~, WA ~a~ ~ L~ 3,~2 27 3,412 26 ~
~ ~ SL ~ MO C~ R. ~1)' 3,~ 15 3,578 15
25 ~ ~ R~t~ ~1~1. ~i~ IL D~vid A, ~v~l 3~26 13 3,~1 13 ~ ~ 24 ~1~ H~ ~ ~,~ ~rne ~
Holiday Retirement Corp.
ALABAMA (2)
EASTDALE ESTATES 334/260-6911 5801 EASTDALE DRIVE MONTGOMERY, AL 36117 ALABAMA
UNIVERSITY OAKS 334/661-7733 650 UNIVERSITY BLVD SOUTH MOBILE, AL 36609 ALABAMA
ARIZONA (6)
DESERT ROSE ~ 520/343-0807 1545 S~ 14TH AVENUE YUMA, AZ 85364 ARIZONA
MADISON, The ~ 602/584-1999 18626 SPANISH GARDEN DRIVE SUN CITY WEST, AZ 85375 ARIZONA
MADISON MEADOWS - 602/944-4222 7211 N 7th STREET PHOE~',IIX, AZ 85020 ARIZONA
MANOR at MIDVALE, The ~ 5201294.3200 6250 S. COMMERCE COURT TUCSON, AZ 85746 ARIZONA
VISTA de la MONTANA + 602/975-4250 18510 N. PARKVIEW PLACE SURPRISE, AZ 85374 ARIZONA
VISTA del RIO + - 602/977-7007 13619 N 94TH DRIVE PEORIA, AZ 85381 ARIZONA
ARKANSAS (4)
ANDOVER PLACE - 5011224.0441 260t ANDOVER COURT LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 ARKANSAS
COUNTRY CLUB VILLAGE + ~ 5011624-6435 1925 MALVERN AVENUE HOT SPRINGS, AR 71901 ARKANSAS
GARDENS at ARKANSHIRE, The + - 501/750-1131 5000 ARKANSHIRE CIRCLE SPRINGDALE, AR 72764 ARKANSAS
SOUTH WIND HEIGHTS 8701932-9288 2305 BERNARD STREET JONESBORO, AR 72401 ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA (39)
ARCADIA PLACE 760/945-5555 1080 ARCADIA AVENUE VISTA, CA 92084 CALIFORNIA
BAY PARK 510/223..7977 2621 APPIAN WAY PINOLE, CA 94564 CALIFORNIA
BRIDGECREEK 626/332-1135 3601 HOLT AVENUE WESTCOVINA, CA 91791 CALIFORNIA
CAMELOT, The 909/929-0145 800 WEST OAKLAND HEMET, CA 92543 CALIFORNIA
CANTERBURY COURT 619/585-8585 336 C STREET CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 CALIFORNIA
CARRIAGE HOUSE ESTATES + - 805/663-8393 8200 WESTWOLD DRIVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93311 CALIFORNIA
COLUMBUS ESTATES +~ 805/872-5855 3201 COLUMBUS BAKERSFIELD, CA 93306 CALIFORNIA
COUNTRY INN 510/790-1645 2860 COUNTRY DRIVE FREMONT, CA 94536 CALIFORNIA
CREEKSIDE OAKS ^ 916/983-3397 1715 CREEKSIDE DR~VE FOLSOM, CA 95630 CALIFORNIA
DEER PARK 415/897.0064 646 CANYON ROAD NOVATO, CA 94947 CALIFORNIA
FIG GARDEN 2091432-6213 6035 N, MARKS AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93711 CALIFORNIA
GOLD COUNTRY HOUSE: 707/553-2698 350 LOCUST DRIVE VALLEJO, CA 94591 CALIFORNIA
HAMPSHIRE, THE + ~ 209/383-3500 3460 R STREET MERCED, CA 95348 CALIFORNIA
HILLTOP ESTATES + 530/241-4444 451 HILLTOP DRIVE REDDING. CA 96003 CALIFORNIA
LAS BRISAS 805/543-0144 1299 BRIARWOOD DRIVE SAN LUlS OBISPO, CA 93401 CALIFORNIA
LEISURE GARDEN HOUSE 707/447-2496 799 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE VACAVILLE, CA 95688 CALIFORNIA
LEISURE MANOR HOUSE 209/823-0164 430 NORTH UNION ROAD MANTECA, CA 95337 CALIFORNIA
LEISURE POINTE ~ 909/888-9991 1371 PARKSIDE DRIVE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 CALIFORNIA
MAGNOLIA 909/3540230 8537 MAGNOLIA AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 CALIFORNIA
MISSION COMMONS 909/793-8691 10 TERRAClNA BLVD REDLANDS, CA 92373 CALIFORNIA
OAKMONT, The 530/895-0123 2801 COHASSET CHICO,, CA 95973 CALIFORNIA
OAKS of AUBURN, The 530/888-1144 3250 BLUE OAKS DRIVE AUBURN, CA 95602 CALIFORNIA
PALMS, The - 562/944-1800 13001 LA MIRADA BLVD LA MIRADA, CA 90638 CALIFORNIA
QUAIL LODGE ^ 925/778-7453 4850 DEER VALLEY ROAD ANTIOCH, CA 94509 CALIFORNIA
REDWOOD 707/257-0333 2350 REDWOOD ROAD NAPA, CA 94558 CALIFORNIA
REMINGTON, The + - 559/567-9999 2727 NORTH 11th AVENUE HANFORD, CA 93230 CALIFORNIA
SIERRA HILLS " 559/788-0311 2500 W. HENDERSON AVENUE PORTERVILLE, CA 93257 CALIFORNIA
SPRINGS of El CAJON, The 619/44.4-9470 444 PRESCOTT AVENUE El CAJON, CA 92020 CALIFORNIA
SPRINGS of ESCONDIDO, The 760/743-4200 1261 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE ESCONDIDO, CA 92027 CALIFORNIA
SPRINGS of NAPA, The 707/224-7855 3460 VILLA LANE NAPA, CA 94558 CALIFORNIA
STANDIFORD PLACE + 209/521-7000 3420 SHAWNEE DRIVE MODESTO, CA 95350 CALIFORNIA
VILLA SERENA 408/261-6350 1340 POMEROY AVENUE SANTA CLARA. CA 95051 CALIFORNIA
VINTAGE, The * 2091339-1500 2145 WEST KETTLEMAN LANE LODI, CA 95242 CALIFORNIA
VINEYARD COMMONS ^ 707/578-6400 3585 ROUND BARN BLVD SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 CALIFORNIA
WALNUT PARK 209/739-1339 4119 W. WALNUT VISALIA, CA 93277 CALIFORNIA
WATERFORD TERRACE 619/463-2111 5580 AZTEC DRIVE LA MESA, CA 91942 CALIFORNIA
WESTLAKE HOUSE SPRINGS 707/585-7878 4855 SNYDER LANE ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 CALIFORNIA
WESTMONT, The 408/964-0605 1675 SCOTT BLVD SANTA CLARA,, CA 95050 CALIFORNIA
WINE COUNTRY HOUSE 707/996-7101 800 OREGON STREET SONOMA, CA 95476 CALIFORNIA
COLORADO (10)
ATRIUM of GRAND VALLEY, The 970/256-0006 3260 N. 121h STREET GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 COLORADO
COURTYARD at LAKEWOOD 303/239-0740 7100 W. 131h AVENUE LAKEWOOD, CO 80215 COLORADO
GREELEY PLACE ~ 970/351-0683 1051 6th STREET GREELEY, CO 80631 COLORADO
LAKEWOOD ESTATES 303/987-3888 8585 W. DAKOTA AVENUE LAKEWOOD, CO 80226 COLORADO
LONGMONT REGENT 303/651-7022 2210 MAIN STREET LONGMONT, CO 80501 COLORADO
MESA VIEW 970/241-0772 601 HORIZON PLACE GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 COLORADO
PARKWOOD ESTATES 9701482-3924 2201 S. LEMAY FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 COLORADO
PUEBLO REGENT 719/566-0111 100 SAN CARLOS ROAD PUEBLO, CO 81005 COLORADO
QUINCY PLACE + ~ 303/770-7775 7200 EAST QUINCY AVENUE DENVER. CO 80237 COLORADO
SUNRIDGE 719/590-1247 5820 FLINTRIDGE DRIVE COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80918 COLORADO
rev. 4/16/99 + garden cottages or suites ' assisted living apartments available ^ under construclJon ~ guest apartmen[.. ~..~/
Holiday Retirement Corp.
MICHIGAN (3)
AURORA POND ^ + 616/530-25tl 5488 BYRON CENTER SW WYOMING, MI 49509 MICHIGAN
INN AT CASS LAKE ^ 248/681-8229 900 N. CASS LAKE ROAD WATERFORD, MI 48328 MICHIGAN
WESCOURT + ~ 517/797-3600 4141 McCARTY ROAD SAGINAW, MI 48603 MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI (1)
CHATEAU RIDC-;-;-;-~LAND 601/956-1331 745 S. PEAR ORCHARD ROAD RIDGELAND, MS 39157 MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI (4)
BRIARCREST ESTATES 314/391-5300 14525 CLAY'TON ROAD BALLWIN, MO 63011 MISSOURI
CAMBRIDGE, The 4171882-2223 2900 S. JEFFERSON SPRINGFIELD, MO 65807 MISSOURI
COUNTRY SQUIRE 816/2;33-4200 1602 BUCKINGHAM STREET ST. JOSEPH, MO 64506 MISSOURI
GARDEN VILLAGE * - 816/436-5555 8550 N. GRANBY AVENUE KANSAS CITY, MO 64154 MISSOURI
MONTANA (3)
ASPEN VIEW + - 406/652-7788 3075 AVENUE C BILLINGS, MT 59102 MONTANA
GRIZZLY PEAK 406/721-2292 3600 AMERICAN WAY MISSOULA, MT 59802 MONTANA
HUNTERS POINTE + - 4061443-4222 2801 COLONIAL DELVE HELENA, MT 59601 MONTANA
NEBRASKA (1)
BRENTWOOD ESTATES 402/489-1112 1111 SOUTH 70th LINCOLN, NE 68510 NEBRASKA
NEVADA (3)
CARSON PLAZA - 702/883-1221 2120 EAST LONG CARSON CITY, NV 89706 NEVADA
MONTARA MEADOWS 702/435-3150 3150 EAST TROPICANA AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89121 NEVADA
RENO CAMLU - 702/825-2044 1920 HARVARD WAY RENO, NV 89502 NEVADA
NEW JERSEY (1)
YARDLEY COMMONS 609/772-1313 209 LAUREL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO (2)
BEAR CANYON ESTATEiS + ~ 505/292-9191 4440 MORRIS STREET NE ALBUQUERQUE. NM 87111 NEW MEXICO
GOLDEN MESA ^ + 505/522.4219 151 N. ROADRUNNER PKWY LAS CRUSES. NM 88011 NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK (1)
DIAMOND RIDGE 518/233-0974 59 HARRIS ROAD TROY, NY 12182 NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA (4)
CARMEL PLACE 704/541-8012 5512 CARId~L ROAD CHARLOTTE, NC 28226 NORTH CAROLINA
DURHAM REGENT + 919/490-.6224 3007 PICKETT ROAD DURHAM, NC 27705 NORTH CAROLINA
EMERALD POND ' ~ 9191493-4713 205 EMERALD POND LANE DURHAM, NC 27705 NORTH CAROLINA
LAKE SHORE COMMONS +' 9101251-0067 1402 HOS~TAL PLAZA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28401 NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO (1)
NEW ENGLAND CLUB ' - 513/474-2582 8135 BEECHMONTAVENUE CINCINNATI, OH 45255 OHIO
OREGON (21)
DORCHESTER HOUSE - 541/994-7175 2701 N. HIGHWAY t01 LINCOLN CITY, OR 97367 OREGON
EDGEWOOD DOWNS 503/643-5418 7799 SW SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD BEAVERTON, OR 97008 OREGON
EDGEWOOD PLACE 503/643-6501 14825 SW FARMINGTON ROAD BEAVERTON, OR 97007 OREGON
GARDEN VALLEY 541/673-1774 1800 HUGHWOOD ROSEBURG, OR 97470 OREGON
GRESHAU MANOR - 503/667-9330 2895 E. POWELL BLVD GRESHAM, OR 97080 OREGON
HIDDEN LAKES + 503/588-2922 400 MADRONA AVENUE SE SALEM, OR 97302 OREGON
MADRONA HILLS + 503/362-9141 707 MADRONA AVENUE SE SALEM, OR 97302 OREGON
MOUNTAIN VIEW + · 541/482-3292 548 NORTH MAIN ASHLAND, OR 97520 OREGON
PARKROSE CHATEAU + 503/257.6777 3141 NE 148th AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97230 OREGON
REGENT, The - 541/752-:>??? 440 ELKS DRIVE CORVALLIS, OR 97330 OREGON
RIDGE AT MADRONA HILLS + 503/540-0422 660 RATCLIFF DRIVE SE SALEM, OR 97302 OREGON
ROCK CREEK - 503/617-1900 19295 NW CORNELL ROAD HILLSBORO, OR 97124 OREGON
ROGUE VALLEY 541/479-6400 1001 A STREET NE GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 OREGON
ROYAL MARC 503/053-1854 5555 KING ROAD MILWAUKIE, OR 97222 OREGON
ROYAL OAK 541/779-0790 2180 POPLAR DRIVE MEDFORD, OR 97504 OREGON
SHELDON OAKS 541/341-3700 2525 CAL YOUNG ROAD EUGENE, OR 97401 OREGON
SOLVANG 5411461-0490 1202 JACOBS DRIVE EUGENE, OR 97402 OREGON
STONE LODGE ^ 541/318-0450 1460 NE 2TTH BEND, OR 97701 OREGON
STONEYBROOK LODGE ^ + 541/754-1961 4700 SW HOLLYHOCK CIRCLE CORVALLIS, OR 97333 OREGON
SUMMER.FIELD CLUBHOUSE ESTATES 503/620-8160 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DRIVE TIGARD, OR 97224 OREGON
VINEYARD PLACE ~ 503/659-0552 4017 SE VINEYARD ROAD MILWAUKIE, OR 97267 OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA (3)
BETHEL PARK - 412/833-3220 2960 CHURCH ROAD BETHEL PARK, PA 15102 PENNSYLVANIA
NIAGARA VILLAGE ^ 8141480-8822 2380 VILLAGE COMMON DRIVE ERIE, PA 16506 PENNSYLVANIA
WALNUT WOODS OF BOYERTOWN 610/367-6616 35 NORTH WALNUT BOYERTOWN, PA 19512 PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND (1)
POCASSET LODGE ' 401/421-6610 12 OLD POCASSET LANE JOHNSTON, RI 02919 RHODE ISLAND
rev. 4/16/99 + garden cottages or suites * assisted living apartments available ^ under construction - guest apartmept~
Holiday Retirement Corp.
ALBERTA (4)
CANYON MEADOWS - 403/278-4004 12 DEERVIEWTERRACE SE CALGARY, AB T2J 7E6 ALBERTA
CHURCHILL MANOR - 403/466-2961 5815 34TH AVENUE EDMONTON, AB T6L 7B8 ALBERTA
IRONWOOD ESTATES - 403/459-0770 40 IRONWOOD POINT ST. ALBERT, AB T8N 6C7 ALBERTA
VICTORIA PARK ~ 403/309-1957 9 AVERY STREET RED DEER, AB T4R 2S6 ALBERTA
BRITISH COLUMBIA (4)
IMPERIAL PLACE ~ 604/581-1555 13853 102nd AVENUE SURREY, BC V3T 1P2 BRITISH COLUMBIA
LONGLAKE CHATEAU 250/756-1411 3035 ROSS ROAD NANAIMO, BC V9T 5S8 BRITISH COLUMBIA
OKANAGAN CHATEAU - 250/862-9088 2100 BENVOULIN KELCWNA, BC VlW 3A4 BRITISH COLUMBIA
VICTORIAN, The 250/477-1912 1773 FELTHAM ROAD VICTORIA, BC VSN 2A4 BRITISH COLUMBIA
MANITOBA (2)
AMBER MEADOW ^ 204/633-5467 320 PIPELINE ROAD WINNIPEG, MB R2.P 2X5 MANITOBA
WESTHAVEN. The 204/831..6742 3033 PORTAGE AVENUE WINNIPEG, MB R3K 2E3 MANITOBA
ONTARIO (5)
ANCHOR POINTE ^ + 905/938-7070 540 ONTARIO STREET ST. CATHARINES, ON L2N 6J7 ONTARIO
CRYSTAL VIEW LODGE ^ + 613/225-4560 6 MERIDIAN PLACE NEPEAN. ON K2G 6L9 ONTARIO
KENSINGTON COURT 5192966-8558 1953 CABANA ROAD W. WINDSOR, ON N9G 1C7 ONTARIO
KINGSDALE CHATEAU ^ 613/547-4884 520 KINGSDALE AVENUE KINGSTON, ON K7M 9B6 ONTARIO
MASONVILLE MANOR 519/663-0220 350 NORTH CENTRE ROAD LONDON, ON N5X 3W1 ONTARIO
QUEBEC (5)
MANOIR BOlS de BOUL(~NE ~ 514/745-3414 10005 AVENUE BOlS de BOULOGNE MONTREAL, PQ H4N 3B2 QUEBEC
MONACO, Residence le + - 514/333-6060 1300 ALEXIS-NIHON BLVD VILLE ST. LAURENT,PQ H4R 2K8 QUEBEC
SAINT PATRICK, Residence le 418/522-6444 100, GRANDE - ALLEE EST QUEBEC CITY, PQ GIR 5N2 QUEBEC
STEGAR, Residence la 514/337-(X)00 2450 THIMENS BLVD SAINT-LAURENT, PQ H4R 2M2 QUEBEC
WELLESLEY. Le ~ 514/697-7331 230 BOULEVARD HYMUS POINTE-CLAIRE, PQ H9R 5P5 QUEBEC
SASKATCHEWAN (2)
PRIMROSE CHATEAU - 306/975-0663 310 CREE CRESCENT SASKATOON. SK S7K 8C7 SASKATCHEWAN
QUEEN VICTORIA ESTATES ^ 306/790-1900 2025 HESELTINE ROAD REGINA, SK S4N 71_2 SASKATCHEWAN
ENGLAND (2)
HAWTHORNS, The 127/579-0060 18-21 ELTON ROAD CLEVEDON,NSOMERSET ENGLAND
(Or 1) (44) BS21 7RG
HAWTHORNS-EASTBOURNE, The ^ 132/364-4111 4 CAREW ROAD EASTBOURNE, E. SUSSEX . ENGLAND
(011) (44) BN21 2B.F
FACIUTY LOCATION TOTALS
UNITED STATES 216
CANADIAN 22
UNITED KINGDOM 2
TOTAL FACILITIES 240
rev~ 4/16/99 + garden cottages or suites * assisted living apartments available ^ under constructioo ~ guest apartment
Photographs
Devonshire Estates Retirement Residence
Lenox, Massachuse~s
Devonshire Estates Retirement Residence.
Lenox, Massachusetts
Waterford Terrace Retirement Residence
La Mesa, California
Dining Room
Westmi_nster Retirement Residence
Greenville, South Cam!inc
Drawings
I PERSPECTP~ V~.W FROM THE CORNER OF HERMOSA A~. AND 19~ ST.
.m,-m~ RANCHO CUCAMONG& CAL~ORNL~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS -
An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the
southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue -
APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan
Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use
Permit 99-08.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of Landmark Designation 99-02 by adoption of the attached Resolution as unanimously
recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission and staff.
BACKG ROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject residence was constructed around 1934. The house is a two-story structure composed
of native rock on the first floor and stucco finish on the second floor. This structure is a good
example of a grove house. It is unique in that it follows the Mission style of architecture, whereas
most of the typical grove houses were built in the Craftsman style.
The Beckley House certainly qualifies for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria
from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and
architectural setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts of
Findings section of the attached Historic Preservation Commission staff report and Resolution dated
June 9, 1999, (see Exhibit "A").
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SS:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated June 9, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes Dated June 9, 1999
Resolution of Approval
,.. j
CITY OF RANCHO CU ~AMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:: June 9, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Histodc Preservation Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS -
An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the
southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue -
APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan
Amendment 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use
Permit 99-08.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
A. Historic Significance: The subject residence was constructed around 1934. The house is a two-
story structure composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco finish on the second floor. This
structure is a good example of a grove house. It is unique in that it follows the Mission style of
architecture, whereas most of the typical grove houses were built in the Craftsman style.
B. Site Charaqteristics: The site presents a gentle slope from north to south. In addition to the
residence, a detached garage constructed at a later time is set slightly to the east of the main
residence. The grove house retains much of its setting because it is centrally located and has been
well kept since its construction. The subject property is separated from the adjoining properties by
a 6-foot high chain link fence.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The residence is in very good condition with all of the significant extedor features having
been retained (Exhibit "B"). The house is a two-story design with a large front porch. The roof is
Spanish tile and a combination native rock and stucco on the first and second floor, respectively.
The style of architecture used in the house constitutes an example of the use of native materials for
the construction of residential homes. Additionally, the house is an example of a well designed
mission in its architectural style (Exhibit "B").
B. Landmark Designation: The requested landmark designation is for the Beckley House. The subject
structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the City's Histodc
Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and architectural setting.
Details concerning these areas follow:
1. Historical Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type,
style, region, or way of life.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
LD 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 2
Fact/s: The house identifies the histodc pedod of the early 1900s when grove and vineyard
production was at its peak in the community and the region. The residence is an
example of a grove house which was common at the tum of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once
common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is 65 years old and is an example of using native
materials for the construction and design of a mission style of architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once
common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent, but
now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
2. Historic Architectural and En,qineerin,cl Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is beautiful or its details
and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The residence is a two-story structure in the Mission Style of architecture. The
extedor of the house is composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco on the
second floor. In general the architectural style further enhances the historic
character of the buildings in the area.
C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of Article 19,
Section 15308 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in theInland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot
radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the
attached Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Landmark Designation 99-02 to designate the
Beckley House as an Historic Landmark to the City Council.
City Planner
BB:SS:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Photos
Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council
HIGHLAND AVENUE
EXISTING ~ITE PLAN
~'--
~NO~TT~ ~'
Chairman McNiel asked if there was a need to import the dirt.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that he could not answer the question b he is not
familiar with the grading plans.
Chairman McNiel added that this project was not designated under th~ Ordinance.
Chairman Macias asked if the Building Official would verify the
Mr. Buller stated a soi~ analysis as well as grading check; be completed and redfled.
Chairman Macias asked for confirmation that this take place and if it would be part of the
public hearing process.
Mr. Bullet confirmed that it would take would not be part of the public review. He added
that the final grading plans go through plan check.
Commissioner Mannerino stated~ I and 2 were per plan and that 3 and 4 would be per
plan as well and that the Department would certify the grading had been done correctly
and that they do check the ~elopers.
Motion; Moved by seconded by Macias to adopt the resolution approving
Development Re~ Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES:
ABS NONE -carried
PUBLIC HEARINGS
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99°02 - CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation
from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast comer of
Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related files: Development District
Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
(Continued from May 12, 1999)
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02-
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District
zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the
southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files:
General Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark
Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. (Continued from May 12, 1999)
Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 9, 1999
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential
care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium
Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located
on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076.111-09. Related
files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development
District Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
Chairman McNiel reminded the Commissioners that they had agreed to hear Item A from the
Historic Preservation agenda, Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02, in conjunction with General
Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit
99-08.
Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and noted that he had received
favorable calls from neighbors and that one resident in opposition of the project was in
attendance.
Chairman McNiet opened the public headng.
Garth Brandaw, Holiday Retirement Homes, 2260 McGilchdst Street, SE, Suite 100, Salem,
Oregon, stated their company operates 220 retirement facilities. He commented that he felt their
plans are compatible with the other uses surrounding the project and is pleased with the fact that
they had been able to provide over 50 percent open space on the developed site as well as being
able to intertwi!ne the historic residence and adjacent orange grove in with the development. He
added they had kept a strong residential scale to the project and that they were not heady as
institutional as other facilities of this kind.
Mark Hodbek, 10089 Mignonette, Rancho Cucamonga, raised concern about the Initial Study and
the related impacts. He thought this project will change the character of the neighborhood. He
noted that the PUD, apartments, and the park have all impacted the tract on the west side of
Hermosa and he did not like the idea of adding more density to the area. He felt this facility is a
commercial enterprise and that it would violate the current zoning for the site and asked for
clarification of the same. He thought public services will be significantly impacted because there
is no control of the traffic and he felt the noise impact will be severe. He added that he had
counted 13 burned out street lights and that he felt the existing neighborhood had been ignored
and dumped on. He concluded by saying he felt the project does not rei'lect, or is sensitive to, the
existing neighborhood.
Commissioner Macias asked how the residents would get around town.
Mr. Brandaw said that most of the residents are in their seventies or early eighties and that they
most likely would be living alone and only about 20 percent of them would slill be driving and their
trips would be limited. He indicated that even if there are 2 persons in each suite, the project
would still have fewer trips than what would be used by 23 single family dwellings. He added that
the trip times for these residents is not typically during peak periods and with only 12-16 staff
members, the parking demands are low.
Mike Robbins, 9920 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, reported that the temple is located near
another facility of this kind and that they have been a good neighbor and that his experience with
this type of use has been good.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 9, 1999
Mike Jumper, 666 Brissac Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how many suites would be in the
facility.
Mr. Branclaw indicated 114 suites.
Mr. Jumper asked how you get 114 suites with a zoning of only 4-8 dwelling units per acre and
felt this might be like another apartment building with more people per acre. He added that he did
not like zoning changes.
Brad Bullet, City Planner stated that some sites can have altemative land uses and that it may not
be solely based upon density depending upon the use and that the number of rooms is not related
to the land use category. He explained that with a Conditional Use Permit, which is discretionary,
the Planning Commission evaluates the project to see if it fits into the existing neighborhood. He
stated this project would not be permitted under the Low Residential category but that it can be
permitted under the Low-Medium Residential category.
Chairman McNiel commented that his Mother-in-law had resided in lhis kind of facility for 3-4 years
and that few people came to visit. He pointed out that the people there were always quiet, trouble
free, that they caused no problems and that it was actually a benefit to the neighborhood because
there were no calls about loud music, graffiti, or extra noise in the street. He confirmed his belief
that this is a good use.
Mr. Jumper acknowledged the point was well taken but then asked what would happen if the
developer left and if the building could become apartments or some other use at a later time or
if more units could be added at a later time. He added that he wished the property could stay the
way it is or become single family homes.
Mr. Buller adviised him that this use could not be modified and that the Conditional Use Permit
would be revoked under those circumstances.
Hubert Surki, 10223 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he lives just east of this
development and that he never received notification. He reported the traffic on 19th Street is very
noisy especially at rush hour and with big dgs traveling 19th Street all day long. He cited noise
from the school traffic as well as the park traffic would not be pleasing to the residents of this
facility. He asked how far from 19th Street the facility would be as well as how many parking
spaces would be available.
Mr. Salazar responded by saying that sound mitigation would be in ptace and that a noise study
would be required. He also stated that one parking space for every 4 beds were required totaling
29 required spaces and that 67 spaces are provided, so that even if there were 2 beds per suite,
it would exceed the requirement.
Mr. Bullet mentioned that Mr. Surki would have liked the developer to approach him and ask him
his thoughts about the project. He recalled meeting Mr. Surki at the previous Planning
Commission meeting and noted that Mr. Surki did receive the notice of the public hearing but was
hoping to meet the developer and review the plans.
Rich Underwood, 10203 Ring Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he liked the look of
the project but wanted to know the age requirements for the residents and if there will be CC&Rs.
He also commented that one gets used to the noise but that he hopes the traffic will lighten up
after the freeway is completed, relieving some of the high use travel on 19th Street.
Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 9. 1999
Mr. Brandaw stated that the lease agreement states 65 years of age as the minimum but due to
ADA regulations, they have to make a reasonabre accommodation if for example an older person
has a spouse under the age of 65. He added that their lease provides three meals per day,
transportation, and housekeeping and that the age of the residents is self recjulating because with
those kinds of services, younger folks would generally not want to live there.
Chairman McNiel asked if it is based more upon their ability to function.
Mr. Brandaw replied that the health of the resident is determined and taken into account.
Mr. Buller noted that a condition could be placed stipulating seniors 65 years of age and above
to help regulate, but that s~nce it is a Conditional Use Permit, we can consider additional conditions
at a later time if it should become a problem.
Chairman McNiel commented on the activities in the adiacent park and pointed out that another
facility of this type is located next to Red Hill Park on Base Line Road, which is a very busy street.
He remarked that the seniors in that facility often sit on their balconies and watch the baseball
cjames. He a~so noted that the noise study had not yet been completed.
Commissioner Macias concluded that the residents that live there will adiust to their community
iust as well as anyone else. He said it is their choice to live there, it is their choice to open or close
the windows, watch tv inside, or go outside and listen to the noise. He felt they are not going there
to die but are going to go there to enjoy the remainder of their lives and they will adiust to their
community.
Hearing no further comments, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Stewart reported that she and Commissioner Tolstoy sat on Design Review
together for this project. She asserted that the applicant was careful to design the project to be
compatible with the neighborhood and that more senior housing is an identified need in Rancho
Cucamonga. She also noted that typically the residents travel in groups and that they use very
few cars and that with the land use change there is actually more open space than with some
other use. She remarked that this applicant was even willing to preserve a historic home and that
the Conditional Use Permit allows the Planning Commission leverage and that it can be revoked
later if it became necessary.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias to recommend issuance of a Negative
Declaration of Environmental impacts and to adopt the resolutions recommending that the City
Council approve Historic Landmark Designation 99-02, General Plan Amendment 99-02,
Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL. STEWART, TOLSTOY'
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE -carried
structure to be used as a pool house in the Very .... to 2 dwelling
Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 9. 1999
" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 -
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan
land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres
of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street -
APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Development District Amendment 99-02,
Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to
change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of
Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General
Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark
Designation 99-02.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 -
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a
two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square
feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on
approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application
Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District
Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development
District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
July 7, 1999
Page 2
BAC KGROUN D/ANALYSIS
At its June 9, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the
approval of the subject General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, and
Conditional Use Permit.
During the meeting there were a total of five residents that presented testimony regarding the
project. Two residents spoke in favor of the project. Two expressed concerns about the land use
density and the proximity of the project to 19th Street. One resident was in opposition and did not
support the project. For detailed information please find the attached Planning Commission
minutes.
Additional background and staff analysis of the project are contained in the attached Planning
Commission staff report of June 9, 1999.
FACTS FOR FINDING
The Planning Commission findings are contained in the attached staff report of June 9, 1999. If
the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission, it may adopt them for its
actions on these applications.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the
property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the
project site.
Respectfully submitted,
"
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SS:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 9, 1999
Exhibit "B"- Planning Commission Minutes dated June 9, 1999
Resolution of Approval for GPA 99-02
Ordinance for DDA 99-02
Resolution of Approval for CUP 99-08
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 -
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS -An application to change the General Plan
land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres
of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN:
1076-111-09.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to
change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of
Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 -
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a
two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square
feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on
approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review
98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment
99-02, and Landmark Designation 99-02.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: Proposed General Plan and Development District regulations will allow the
development of 4-8 dwelling units per acre of land. Presently 2-4 dwelling units per acre are
authorized. Additionally, the developer is proposing to construct a new two-story building
totaling 51,095 square feet, to be used in conjunction with the 2,097 square foot existing single
family home to operate a residential care facility for the elderly.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North Single family residential; Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units/acre)
South - Park and school; Open Space District
East Single family home; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units/acre)
West Single family homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units/acre)
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 2
C. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre)
North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre)
South - Open Space (Park and School)
East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre)
West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre)
D. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use of Beds Ratio . Required Provided
Residential Care Facility 114 1/4 beds 29 67
E. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa
Avenue. Hamilton Street is located on the south side of the property. The site is presently
improved with a single family dwelling unit which has a Potential Local Landmark designation
and citrus groves. The site consists of a single parcel approximately 5.1 acres in size and
gently slopes from north to south.
ANALYSIS:
A. Back.qround: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Review workshop on November
10, 1998 The Commission offered favorable comments regarding the architecture for the
building and site planning. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit "J").
B. General: The developer is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation of the
property, from Low Residential to Low-Medium, in order to allow the use and construction of
a residential care facility on the subject site. The residential care facility is a conditionally
permitted use in the Low-Medium Residential District.
The project, as proposed, will have a total of 114 suites for the eldedy. The suites are similar
to an apartment unit without a kitchen. The retirement facility will have centralized services
to provide three meals daily, housekeeping, laundering, private bus transportation, and
various activities~ The facility will be operated 24 hours a day with staff available at all times.
The new developer is proposing to construct a two-story building in order to to continue the
residential atmosphere of the neighborhood. The developer is also proposing to incorporate
the existing single family home into the proposed residential care facility by converting it into
the Club House. The exterior of the house would remain as is. Furthermore, the developer
recognizes the historical significance of the house and in conjunction with this request, is
seeking approval of an Historical Landmark Designation. Currently, the single family home
has a Potential Local Landmark designation.
C. The developer is proposing to remove seven palm trees, one fruit tree, and one Eucalyptus
tree in order to accommodate the construction of the proposed residential care facility
(Exhibit "K"). As required under the tree preservation ordinance, the developer is required to
relocate those trees that can be relocated and replace those trees with a tree of similar size
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 3
for those that can not be relocated. Staff has included a condition in the Planning Commission
resolution requiring the developer to submit an arborist report to determine the replacement
value of the trees to be removed or relocated.
D. Appropriateness of the proposed Low Medium Residential Desi,qnation: The subject site is
located in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The surrounding properties located on
the north side of 19th Street have Low-Medium and Medium residential densities. The
surrounding properties located on the south side of 19th Street have a Low Residential land
use and zoning designation. The subject 5.1 acre parcel is of sufficient size and configuration
to accommodate a high-quality residential project, evidenced by the application submitted for
the residential care facility. The use of the single family home is contingent upon the approval
of General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Landmark
Designation 99-02 by the City Council.
Additionally, the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that a Low-Medium land use
designation would be appropriate within a low density area in order to encourage greater
housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential
area. Therefore, adoption of the proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation in
conjunction with the retirement care facility would meet one of the goals of the General Plan
and would be compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed residential care
facility will provide housing for the elderly.
E. Appropriateness of the existin,q Low Residential Desi.qnation: The subject property could be
developed under the current land use and zoning district. The property, however, with the
proposed development and land use change, will provide a greater amount of open space.
The maximum lot coverage under the existing land use designation is 40 percent. The
proposed site coverage for the project is 23 percent. Additionally, should the project be
developed under the current land use designation, the removal the existing single family home
would be required. The existing home is located in the middle of the property. The developer
is proposing to incorporate the existing single family home into the development. The home
will be converted to the club house. Staff, therefore, is in support of the proposed land use
and zone change.
F. Housing: The only housing issue for the application is the increase in the number of available
residential units for the elderly once the project is completed. The more intense land use
density would result in an increase in the number of future units; however, the increase is not
considered an adverse impact to the surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposed land
use and zone change would provide greater housing diversity without changing the single
family character of the residential neighborhood.
G. Design Review Committee: On June 1,1999, the Design Review Committee (Henderson,
Stewart, Tolstoy) considered and recommended approval, subject to minor revisions, of the
Site Plan and Building Elevations (Exhibit "1").
H. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has
completed Part II. Staff has found that there may be a significant noise impact caused by
traffic on 19th Street. The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City
standards which requires a detailed study of noise reduction mitigation measures to be
included in the construction design, such as sound barriers or special window glazing.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 4
Therefore, a condition of approval is recommended to require an acoustical report prior to the
issuance of building permits. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then
issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate
FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the
Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings regarding these applications:
The property is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use and development
district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated parcels.
B. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial
Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expected because of
this land use change.
C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Development
Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for a residential
development.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development
District Amendment 99-02 and Conditional Use Permit 99-08 through adoption of the attached
Resolutions.
City Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Map
Exhibit "B" - Development Distdct Map
Exhibit "C" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit"F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "H" - Elevations
Exhibit "1" Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 1, 1999
Exhibit "J" Pre Application Review Comments dated November 10, 1998
Exhibit "K" - Proposed trees to be removed
Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 99-02
Resolution Recommending Approval of Conditional Use Permit 99-08
411
.:,
$~ SITE
.'.'. FROM LOW R.E81DEBTIAL
TO LOW-M~Dm-M REatDEHTIAL
LAND USE PLAN
RESIDENTIAL
~i~i~ VERY' LOW <2 =U's/AC
'":"':--.¥:~ LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
li~ii~!i~ LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DU's/AC
"'"'="='~ MEDIUM 8-~4 DU's/AC
~ MEDIUM HIGH
~' ' 14-24 DU's/AC
~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
Illlllll~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP
RESIDENTIAL
VERY. LOW:-2-'!~U/AC'
LOW n-.~ DU/AC
j~' L~OW-MEDlUM 4-8 DU/AC
~ .MEDIUM a-14 DU/AC
I'"ER"I MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU/AC
r-'R"l HIGH ~,4-ao DU/AC
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project Files: General Plan Amendment 99-02; Development District Amendment 99-02, and
Conditional Use Permit No. 99-08.
2. Related Files: Historic Landmark Designation 99-02, Pre-Application Review 98-08
3. Description of Project: A request to change the land use (GPA 99-02) and zoning (DDA 99-
02) designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land and to construct and to
operate (CUP 99-08) a two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately
53,192 square feet in size.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Curry Brandaw Architects
2260 McGilchrist Street, SE, Suite 200
Salem, OR 97302
5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
6. Zoning: Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site consists of a single parcel improved with a single
family home and an orange grove. The property to the north is improved with a multi-family project
and has a land use designation of Low-Medium Residential. The properties to the east and west of
the site are improved with single family homes and have a land use designation of Low Residential.
The property to the south is improved with a park and school and has a land use designation of Open
Space.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Salvador M Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"
or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
(x) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Cimulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources Systems
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Aesthetics
( ) Air Quatity (x) Noise (X) Cultural Resources
( ) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Recreation
Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION wilt be prepared.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one
effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project.
Signe¢' _ ~/'~
~'~. Salazar, AICP
LAss'dciate Planner
May 18, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
~ ~ Significant
I I impact Less
IP°tentially I Unless I Then I
Issues and Supporting information Sources: ISignifyant I Mitigation Isigni~mant I No
I Impact I lnc°rporamdI Impact I Impact I
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the propose/;
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
( ) ( ) (x) ( )
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Disrupt or dJvJde the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-d) The developer is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation of the
property from Low Residential to Low-Medium Residential in order to accommodate the
use and construction of a new residential care facility. The proposed Low-Medium land
use and zoning designation would meet the goals of the General Plan and would be
compatible with the surrounding properties. The Land Use Element of the General Plan
indicates that a Low-Medium zoning designation would be appropriate within low density
areas in order to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family
character of the surrounding residential area. Therefore, the proposed request will
further the goals of the General Plan.
I I Significant
I I Impact Less
IP°tentiell¥ IUn~I Then I I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignificant I Mitigation ISignir~-'ant I No I
I Imp~qt I lnc°rp°releclI ImpactJ Impact
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Wou/d the proposa/:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 4
J Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ Impact Less
Potentially I Unless I Than I I
Significant I Mitigation Isign~canl I No I
Impact Imc°rP°rated I Imp~,~:tI Impact I
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Significant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless I Then I I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignirmant Mitigation ITM I No I
I Impact tn<~rporated I Impact ! Imm~ct I
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, orthe
rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? () ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) ' Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 5
I I Significant
I I Impact Lass
IPotentia,y ! Unless I Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ITM I Mitigation ITM I No I
f impact Ilnc°rp°rated I Impact I Impact I
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) There is no change in absorption rates, drainage patterns or in the rate or amount of
surface run-offs covering of the land. Additionally, the developer will be required to
submit plans to the Engineering Division in order to ensure adequate drainage for the
project.
I t Significant
! I Impact Less
IP°tentially I Unless Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: JSignificant J Mitigation Jsign~r~cant No
I ImpaGI I IncorPorated I Imoact Impact
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The Project will not cause any impacts to the air quality. No significant air quality
impacts would be expected from the development, as the development of the residential
care facility will generate fewer vehicle trips than a similar sized single family or multi-
family residential development. Additionally, the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's Air Quality Management Plan accounts for the existing land use designations
in its programs. The proposed project changes the General Plan and Development
District from Low to Low-Medium Residential. The proposed project will be required to
adhere to South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations. The project is a
residential care facility consisting on 120 suites. Furthermore, under the proposed land
use designation, should the residential care facility not be built, a maximum of 40 units
could be built on this property. According to Table 6-2 of the CEQA Air Quality
Handbook, dated November 1993, the threshold of single family homes that could cause
a potential air quality impact is 166 homes. Therefore, no increase in air quality impacts
is expected from the project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 6
I I Significant
I I Impact Less
JPctentially ~ Unless Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignificant ~ Mitigation ISignifmani No
I Impact I lncorp0rated I Impact Impact
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal
result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The project complies with all City Regulations including the minimum number of parking
spaces and adequate access points.
I I Significant
I ~ Impact Less
~Potentially ~ Unless ] Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignificant ~ Mitigatio~ ~Significant No
I Impact I lncorlx~ated I Impact ~moact
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? () ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal
pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 7
Comments:
a-e) The General Plan and Development Code currently designate the site for residential use
and the proposed amendment will continue the residential land use and zoning
designation. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of the development of the
site.
J Significant
I Impact Lass
Issues and Supporling Informat[on Sources: 'otentially I Unless I Then I
;ignificent I Mitigation ISignificant ~ No I
Impact l Incorporated I Imoect
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Signif'~ant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless I Than I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignificant Mitigation ITM I No I
I Impact tnc~rl;x>rated I ImPact I Imoact J
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? () ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? () ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
I I Significant
I I Impact Less
IPotentially I Unless I Than I I
Issues arid Supporting Information Sources: ITM I Mitigation ITM
I Impact I)r1<~3~poreted I Impact I Impact I
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 8
Comments:
a-b) The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation of the property from Low
to Low-Medium Residential. No increase in noise levels is anticipated as a result of the
proposed land use change; however, the residential care facility proposes to locate an
outdoor activity area adjacent to 19thStreet. VVhen future expected noise levels exceed
6rLdn, the General Plan requires a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements
that should be incorporated into the project design. Staff is recommending that a
noise study be prepared to address traffic noise levels in this area and
recommend mitigation measures, if any. A condition of approval will be placed
in the Planning Commission Resolution which requires the submittal of a Noise
Study report for review and approval of by the City Planner prior to issuance of
building permits.
I I Sign~icant
I I Impact Less
~Potantially I Unless ] Than I
Issues and Supportirtg Information Sources ITM I Mitigation ISignif'~,ant No
I ImPa~ I IncorporatedI ImoactImpect
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? () ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? () ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? () ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-e) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on public services.
I I S~gnir~.ant
I I Impac:~ Less
IP°tentlelly I Unless j Than I I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ISignscant I MitJgalion ITM I No I
I Impa~ Ilnc, oqx)rated ! Impact I Imoact I
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wou/dtheproposa/
result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 9
~ ~ Significant
I I Impact Less
IPctential~y I unless I Than I I
Issues and Suppooling Information Sources: ISignificant I Mitigation ISignificant I No I
I Impact IlncorporatedI Impact I Impact I
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on utilities and service
systems.
I I Significant
I I Impact Less
I Polentially I Unless I Then I I
Issues and Supiporting Information Sources: I Significant I Mitigation ITM I No I
I Impaqt J lr~orporated [ ImPact I Iml~act J
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-c) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on Aesthetics. The
project is not located adjacent to any scenic vistas or highways. Additionally, the project
is required to comply with adhere to all Municipal Code requirements pertaining to
minimum lighting levels.
I I .oten,,a.,. j
I I Significant
I I Impact Less
IP°tentially I Unless Than I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ITM I Mitigation ~ignif'~.,ant I No
I ~moac't I lncoroorated Iml)ect I Impact
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.'
a) Disturb paleontological resources? () ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? () ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
c) The site is currently improved with a single family home that has a Potential Local
Landmark (PLL) designation. The developer is proposing to incorporate the existing
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Page 10
single family home into the project. Therefore, the impact to historical resources is
considered to be positive.
I I sign~icant
~ ! Impact Lass
~Po~enfiatlyI Unless ! Than
Issues and Supporting tnformatior~ Sources: ~Significant! Mitigation ~$ignificant No
J Impact Ilnc°rp°rated I' Impact Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal.'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The proposed project may increase the demand on parks in the area. The project
developer will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit
issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant.
Significant
Impact Leas
Potenlially Unless I Than I I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~Signiflcant Mitigation ISigflificant I No I
! Impact Incorporated I Impact I Imoaqt I
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animaJ, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) () ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
ltloo3
,~ENT RY: R CIJCAI~)NGA COW DEV; [ i~5-18.99 8:53~; 9094772847 => i · 503 399 0565; //2/3
Initial Stuciy for
GPA 99-02.; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City ol~ Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process.
one or more effects have been adequately analyze~ in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(C)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier documet~(s} pursuant to applicable legaL stanclards, ana
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized In completing this Initia~ Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Cen~er Drive (check all that apply):
(x) General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(x)Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
ISCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(x) Environmental Assessment Part II Initial Study for General Plan Amendment 99-02 anc
Development District Amendment 99-02 (February 22, 1999)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that i am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acl(nowledge that i
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, i have ~evised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where c~early no significant environmental effects woula
or, cur.
Signature;,,, ~~~. ~ 13nt~.-G/t~'lc[c~
Print Name and TitLe'
_~.__~/~,~ g ~[ 7, O !'4 E i ~gt L I-- i
/ ~ VICI~Y MAP
~O~OT $TA~STICS,
~ ~--~ 5t~ ~ W
N TOT~ CO~ 63,~2 ~0 ~ 23.~
~A~ ~S $~ ~ 50.0~
............................................................. ~[?]~
"' ............................... . ~ SITE DEVELOPMENT
/ - ............................................. [ PLAN
, u p~ ' '
19TH STREET
LA~SCA~ LE~ND
~z~ ~,
L~
O0 ~
ioooI
00000
IOOOOOOOOl
oooooooi
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
~ ®~L~,,_..,,~ID-~.~ A._TI~..~ TYPICAL ELEVATION DETAIl
~FIEAR ELEVATION~
~..~~-~-- Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence
TYPICAL SITE SECTION A-A I I I
I I I
~T~ ~ECT~N B-B ~SA AVE. SECTION
~ EXTERI~ F~I~ TO
EXISTt~
~ ~L~V~I~
~ SITE
HA~TON ST. SECT~N D-D COVE~D PARK~ ELEVATI~
~E
Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:20 p.m. Salvador M. Salazar June 1, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and operate a two-story residential care facility
for the elderly, totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in size, in the Low-Medium Residential
district (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast
corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application
Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02.
Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Workshop on November 10, 1998.
The Commission offered favorable comments regarding the architecture and site planning.
Furthermore, the Commission added that a use of this nature was needed in Rancho Cucamonga
and the surrounding communities.
Design Parameters: The property to the north is improved with a multi-family project. The
properties to the east and west of the site are improved with single family homes. The property to
the south is improved with a park and school.
The project involves development of approximately 5.1 acres of land with a residential care facility.
The site has a gentle slope from north to south. The proposed new facility will be two-stories high
and approximately 29.5 feet high. Additionally, because of the location of the project, and in an
effort to retain the residential atmosphere of the neighborhood, the developer is proposing to retain
the existing two-story home on the site. The existing home is a Potential Local Landmark.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project.
1. Use of River Rock. The developer is proposing to use river rock only on the main entrance
of the building. However, staff is recommending that in order to comply with the 360-degree
architecture policy, the river rock treatment should be used in all elevations. Additionally, all
of the architectural features, including river rock and recommended arches, should be used
on all elevations of the covered parking spaces located on the southeast section of the
property.
2. Arches. Staff is recommending that, in order to further historical significance, traditional
architectural materials and styles be used. The design should incorporate the use of arches
to connect the columns along the front elevation. Additionally, all of the windows on the first
floor should be redesigned and have a window surround using dyer rock similar to the existing
dwelling unit.
3. Air Conditioning Units. The developer is proposing to use wall mounted air conditioning units
for each suite. However, staff is recommending that these units not be visible from the street.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.
1. Landscaping along the street frontage of the property. Staff is recommending that
additional landscape treatment along the street be provided to ensure the parking areas are
adequately screened from adjacent street views. Berming in these parking areas shall be a
minimum of 3 feet high and have a natural appearance in form.
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 1, 1999
Page 2
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1. All river rock used in the project shall be native.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to all
recommended modifications. All changes to the development plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to Planning Commission review.
Desicon Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Salvador M. Salazar
Of the items listed as major issues the applicant agreed to further enhance the building elevations
by using river rock at strategic locations as directed by the Design Review Committee. Additionally,
with regards to the covered parking spaces, the DRC agreed with the developer to replace them
with carports. The design and style of the carports is required to be similar to the main building,
including the use of tile, and river rock for the columns. The carports, in order to screen the parking
spaces, shall have a river rock wall on the south side.
With regards to the use of arches, the developer agreed to incorporate them into the building
elevations as recommended by staff. Additionally, the arches will be used in all areas where river
rock columns are utilized.
Regarding item No. 3. The developer agreed to place the air conditioning units inside the private
patios. The air conditioning units, for those units with no private patio, will be placed inside of the
wall and will have a maximum visible projection of approximately 6 inches and will be screened by
using a metal shield painted to match the color of the wall (stucco or river rock.
With regards to the secondary issues, the applicant agreed to comply with staff's. recommendation.
B. PRE-App!~I(~ATIQN REVIEW 98-08 - (~I,IRRY - The proposed development of a 114 suite
retirement residence facility for the elderly on 5.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of 19th Street and Hermosa
Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09.
. Brad Buller City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process.
Michael Fuller, architect for Curry BrandawArchitects, introduced the project and indicated that the
proposed retirement residence is a 114-suite facility for the eldedy. He explained the facility is
designed for the elderly that are still ambulatory but in need of some support and the residents
typically will be single people in their late 70s or 80s. Mr. Fuiler further stated that his company had
researched the area and determined this is the best place to construct the retirement facility. With
regards to building design compatibility, he observed the wing ends and building center steps down
from two- to one-story. He asserted that this arrangement minimizes impact to the surrounding
properties. Additionally, Mr. Fuller indicated that the existing house will remain and will be made
part of the proposed development.
Salvador Salazar, Associate Planner, commented on the issue of neighborhood compatibility,
specifically building design and site layout as it relates to the surrounding properties. He noted that
from a design aspect, the building, parking, and open space layout work well with the existing site
features including the potential historic house and existing landscaping.
Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other communities in the
area need this type of facility. He especially liked the open space and the preservation of the
existing house and landscaping. He felt the two-story building would be compatible with the
neighborhood; however, he added that an emeraencv exit could be needed alona 19th Street.
Commissioner Macias agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy; however, he was concemed about
- neighborhood compatibility and the number of vehicle trips generated by the use.
Commissioner Stewart also felt an emergency exit along 19th Street would be needed.
Commissioner Mannerino felt the use is absolutely compatible with the neighborhood.
Chairman McNiel felt that the use and the two-story building are acceptable; however, the building
architecture needs major improvements. He, too, felt the City should have more of these facilities
but reminded the applicant of the land use change process and indicatad the Commission will be
looking to the neighborhood for thoughts about such a project at this location.
Mr. Bullet summarized the Commissioners' comments: The use is a welcome use to the City and
the proposed project's design appears to fit well into the site, the open space allows for the
preservation of the existing house and trees, and the building should be no higher than two-stories
and have significant architectural movement. He also indicated that the property currenfiy is not
zoned to allow this use and an amendment would need to be filed by the applicant.
PC Adjourned Minutes ~4~' °~dl~l~ J N°vember 10' 1~9~ ~d'.~. ~..
HIGHLAND AVENUE
19TH STREET
EXISTING SITE PLAN
........ ~ .... HAM~'~ STREET
t
Chairman McNiel asked if there was a need to import the dirt.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that he could not answer the question be he is not
familiar with the grading plans.
Chairman McNiel added that this project was not designated under th~ Ordinance.
Chairman Macias asked if the Building Official would verify the
Mr. Buller stated a soil analysis as well as grading be completed and redfled.
Chairman Macias asked for confirmation that this take place and if it would be part of the
public headng process.
Mr. Buller confirmed that it would take not be part of the public review. He added
that the final grading plans go through plan check.
Commissioner Mannedno stated Phases 1 and 2 were per plan and that 3 and 4 would be per
plan as well and that the Buil¢ Department would certify the grading had been done correctly
and that they do check ~elopers.
Motion: Moved by seconded by Macias to adopt the resolution approving
Development 99-03. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: _
AJ: NONE -carried
PUBLIC HEARINGS
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation
from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast comer of
Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related files: Development Distdct
Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
(Continued from May 12, 1999)
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02-
CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District
zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the
southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street- APN: 1076-111-09. Related files:
General Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark
Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. (Continued from May 12, 1999)
Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 9, 1999
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY
BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential
care facility for the eldedy totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium
Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located
on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related
files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development
Distdct Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02.
Chairman McNiel reminded the Commissioners that they had agreed to hear Item A from the
Histodc Preservation agenda, Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02, in conjunction with General
Plan Amendment 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit
99-08.
Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and noted that he had received
favorable calls from neighbors and that one resident in opposition of the project was in
attendance.
Chairman McNiel opened the public headrig.
Garth Brandaw, Holiday Retirement Homes, 2260 McGilchdst Street, SE, Suite 100, Salem,
Oregon, stated their company operates 220 retirement facilities. He commented that he felt their
plans are compatible with the other uses surrounding the project and is pleased with the fact that
they had been able to provide over 50 percent open space on the developed site as well as being
able to intertwine the historic residence and adjacent orange grove in with the development. He
added they had kept a strong residential scale to the project and that they were not heady as
institutional as other facilities of this kind.
Mark Hodbek, 10089 Mignonette, Rancho Cucamonga, raised concern about the Initial Study and
the related impacts. He thought this project will change the character of the neighborhood. He
noted that the PUD, apartments, and the park have all impacted the tract on the west side of
Hermosa and he did not like the idea of adding more density to the area. He felt this facility is a
commercial enterprise and that it would violate the current zoning for the site and asked for
clarification of the same. He thought public services will be significantly impacted because there
is no control of the traffic and he felt the noise impact wily be severe. He added that he had
counted 13 bumed out street lights and that he felt the existing neighborhood had been ignored
and dumped on. He concluded by saying he felt the project does not reflect, or is sensitive to, the
existing neighborhood.
Commissioner Macias asked how the residents would get around town.
Mr. Brandaw said that most of the residents are in their seventies or early eighties and that they
most likely would be living alone and only about 20 percent of them would still be driving and their
trips would be limited. He indicated that even if there are 2 persons in each suite, the project
would still have fewer trips than what would be used by 23 single family dwellings. He added that
the trip times for these residents is not typically during peak pedods and with only 12-16 staff
members, the parking demands are low.
Mike Robbins, 9920 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, reported that the temple is located near
another facility of this kind and that they have been a good neighbor and that his experience with
this type of use has been good.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 9, 1999
Mike Jumper, 666 Bdssac Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how many suites would be in the
facility.
Mr. Brandaw indicated 114 suites.
Mr, Jumper asked how you get 114 suites with a zoning of only 4-8 dwelling units per acre and
felt this might be like another apartment building with more people per acre. He added that he did
not like zoning changes,
Brad Buller, City Planner stated that some sites can have alternative land uses and that it may not
be solely based upon density depending upon the use and that the number of rooms is not related
to the land use category. He explained that with a Conditional Use Permit, which is discretionary,
the Planning Commission evaluates the project to see if it fits into the existing neighborhood. He
stated this project would not be permitted under the Low Residential category but that it can be
permitted under the Low-Medium Residential category.
Chairman McNiel commented that his Mother-in-law had resided in this kind of facility for 3-4 years
and that few people came to visit. He,pointed out that the people there were always quiet, trouble
free, that they caused no problems and that it was actually a benefit to the neighborhood because
there were no calls about loud music, graffiti, or extra noise in the street. He confirmed his belief
that this is a good use.
Mr. Jumper acknowledged the point was well taken but then asked what would happen if the
developer left and if the building could become apartments or some other use at a later time or
if more units could be added at a later time. He added that he wished the property could stay the
way it is or become single family homes.
Mr. Bullet advised him that this use could not be modified and that the Conditional Use Permit
would be revoked under those circumstances.
Hubert Surki, 10223 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he lives just east of this
development and that he never received notification. He reported the traffic on 19th Street is very
noisy especially at rush hour and with big rigs traveling 19th Street all day long. He cited noise
from the school traffic as well as the park traffic would not be pleasing to the residents of this
facility. He asked how far from 19th Street the facility would be as well as how many parking
spaces would be available.
Mr, Salazar responded by saying that sound mitigation would be in place and that a noise study
would be required. He also stated that one parking space for every 4 beds were required totaling
29 required spaces and that 67 spaces are provided, so that even if there were 2 beds per suite,
it would exceed the requirement.
Mr. Bullet mentioned that Mr. Surki would have liked the developer to approach him and ask him
his thoughts about the project. He recalled meeting Mr. Surki at the previous Planning
Commission meeting and noted that Mr. Surki did receive the notice of the public hearing but was
hoping to meet the developer and review the plans.
Rich Underwood, 10203 Ring Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he liked the look of
the project but wanted to know the age requirements for the residents and if there will be CC&Rs.
He also commented that one gets used to the noise but that he hopes the traffic will lighten up
after the freeway is completed, relieving some of the high use travel on 19th Street.
Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 9, 1999
Mr. Brandaw stated that the lease agreement states 65 years of age as the minimum but due to
ADA regulations, they have to make a reasonable accommodation if for example an older person
has a spouse under the age of 65. He added that their lease provides three meals per day,
transportation, and housekeeping and that the age of the residents is self regulating because with
those kinds of services, younger folks would generally not want to live there.
Chairman McNiel asked if it is based more upon their ability to function.
Mr. Brandaw replied that the health of the resident is determined and taken into account.
Mr. Buller noted that a condition could be placed stipulating seniors 65 years of age and above
to help regulate, but that since it is a Conditional Use Permit, we can consider additional conditions
at a later time if it should become a problem.
Chairman McNiel commented on the activities in the adjacent park and pointed out that another
facility of this type is located next to Red Hill Park on Base Line Road, which is a very busy street.
He remarked that the seniors in that facility often sit on their balconies and watch the baseball
games. He also noted that the noise study had not yet been completed.
Commissioner Macias concluded that the residents that live there will adjust to their community
just as well as anyone else. He said it is their choice to live there, it is their choice to open or close
the windows, watch tv inside, or go outside and listen to the noise. He felt they are not going there
to die but are going to go there to enjoy the remainder of their lives and they will adjust to their
community.
Hearing no further comments, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Stewart reported that she and Commissioner Tolstoy sat on Design Review
together for this project. She asserted that the applicant was careful to design the project to be
compatible with the neighborhood and that more senior housing is an identified need in Rancho
Cucamonga. She also noted that typically the residents travel in groups and that they use very
few cars and that with the land use change there is actually more open space than with some
other use. She remarked that this applicant was even willing to preserve a histodc home and that
the Conditional Use Permit allows the Planning Commission leverage and that it can be revoked
later if it became necessary.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias to recommend issuance of a Negative
Declaration of Environmental impacts and to adopt the resolutions recommending that the City
Council approve Historic Landmark Designation 99-02, General Ptan Amendment 99-02,
Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE -carried
the required line) to 5 feet to construct an accessory
structure to be used as a pool house in the to 2 dwelling
Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 9, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. ~' ~'/~) ~'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 99-02, TO DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE (BUILT IN
APPROXIMATELY 1934) AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AT 6729
HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1076-111-09.
A. Recitals.
1. Curry Brandaw Architects on behalf of the property owner has filed an application for an
Historic Landmark Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application."
2. On June 9, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. On July 7, 1999, and continued to August 4, 1999, the City Council held their meeting
and approved Landmark Designation 99-02.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the Beckley house located on approximately 5.1 acres of land,
basically a rectangle configuration, located at 6729 Hermosa Avenue.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council, including the minutes
of the public hearing by the Historic Preservation Commission on June 9, 1999, written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The house identifies the historic period of the early 1900's when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
LD 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 2
the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which
was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is 65 years old and is an example of
the use of native materials for the construction and design of a
mission style of architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful
or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The residence is a two-story structure in the Mission Style of
architecture. The exterior of the house is composed of native rock
on the first floor and stucco on the second floor. In general, the
architectural style further enhances the historic character of the
buildings in the area.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15308 Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends approval
of Landmark Designation 99-02 subject to the following condition of approval:
Planning Division:
1) This Landmark Designation shall become effective on August 21,
1999, or 45 days from the first reading of Development District
Amendment 99-02, whichever occurs first.
6. The mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1076-111-09
A. Recitals.
1. The applicant, Curry Brandaw Architects, has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 99-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. On July 7, 1999, and continued to August 4, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, and August 4, 1999, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 5.1 acres,
with a rectangular shape, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and
is presently improved with a single family house and citrus groves. Said property is currently
designated as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); and
b The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are improved with a single family residential project.
The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is
developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with a single family home. The property
to the south is designated as Open Space and is developed with a park and school; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
City COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 2
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area, as evidence
of that is the proposed residential care facility proposed in conjunction with this request; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based
upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during
the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to change the General Plan
Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as
shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
ORDINANCE NO. ~ 7'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND
19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN:1076-111-09.
A. Recitals.
1. The applicant, Curry Brandaw Architects, has filed an application for Development
District Amendment No. 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to
change the Land Use Map from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per Acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located at the southeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street.
3. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. On August 4,. 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the
associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from
Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) for property located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Avenue.
5. On July 7, 1999, and continued to August 4, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 5.1 acres, with
a rectangular shape, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and is
presently improved with a single family house and citrus groves. Said property is currently
designated as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); and
b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are improved with a single family residential project.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 2
The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre) and is
developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with a single family home. The properties
to the south are designated as Open Space and are developed with a park and school; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption
of General Plan Amendment 99-02.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based
upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 3
the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map
for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the
attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
RESOLUTION NO. q~--/,~'c~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 99-08 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TVVO-
STORY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY CONSISTING OF 114 SUITES
FOR THE ELDERLY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON
APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET AND MAKING
FINDINGS INSUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09
A. Recitals.
1. Curry Brandaw Architects has flied an application for the issuance of Conditional Use
Permit No. 99-08, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. On July 7, 1999, and continued to August 4, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, and August 4, 1999, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 19th Street which is presently improved with a single family home; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single family homes,
the property to the south is improved with a school and a park, the property to the east is developed
with a single family home, and the property to the west is developed with a single family residential
development; and
c. The proposed Residential Care Facility use is allowed in the Low-Medium
Residential District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and
d. The project will comply with all applicable provisions of the Development Code,
and the General Plan upon approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02 and Development District
Amendment 99-02; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 2
e. The proposed residential care facility use will provide a needed service to elderly
residents of the community; and
f. The project is designed to be compatible with surrounding development and
provide a high degree of aesthetic appeal; and
g. The proposed use is in accordance with the goals of the General Plan to provide
a full range of housing opportunities.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during
the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby recommends approval of the application subject to each and every
condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference.
Planning Division
1 ) Incorporate densely planted shrub hedges along the north, south, and
west sides of the site to screen parking areas.
2) The refuse storage enclosure shall be designed and constructed using
architectural materials similar to the main building.
3) Locate all roof drains/down spouts inside the building to the degree
possible. Any exterior drain fixtures shall be designed and located to
complement the building architecture.
4) All air conditioning units shall not be visible from the outside of the
building.
5) All other design modifications recommended by the Design Review
Committee shall be incorporated into the project.
6) This Conditional Use Permit shall not become effective until the related
General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment and
Historic Landmark Designations have been approved by the City
Council.
7) The tree removal permit shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner before any tree is removed or relocated.
Engineering Division
1) Conceptual Grading Plan shall include existing features within and
100 feet beyond all site boundaries (label to remain or be removed)-
natural ground, trees, structures, drainage courses, streets, trails,
slopes, etc. The Plan shall include cross sections for all site
boundaries to scale, extending from streets to the top or toe of slopes
adjacent to the parkway.
2) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded
overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite
side of 19th Street shall be paid to the City, prior to issuance of
building permits. The fee shall be in conformance with the approved
Underground Reimbursement Agreement UR-006. The amount for
APN: 1076-111-09 is $44,306.74 plus 10 percent interest per year
from the approval of the Agreement in March of 1990.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO,
CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 4
3) Drive approaches shall be the commercial type, 35 feet wide minimum
and shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing 101 Type C.
Driveway locations shall be a minimum of 100 feet from an intersection
and 200 feet from a signalized intersection. Existing drive approaches
shall be removed and replaced with commercial approaches or curb
and gutter and walls if the driveways will no longer be used.
4) The new driveway on Hermosa Avenue shall be designed to provide
a water barrier. The river rock flood wall return shall be a sufficient
distance from the main driveway to prevent street flows from entering
the site.
5) Driveways on Hamilton Street shall align with, or be offset 150 feet
from, Hermosa Park driveways. Sidewalk on Hamilton Street shall be
property-line-adjacent (transition from existing curb-adjacent at first
driveway) and it shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face.
6) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-
way.
7) Modify 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue traffic signal as required to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8) Install bus bay at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa
Avenue.
9) Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards on
the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and on the
northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hamilton Street. The access
ramps on these corners must be reconstructed to current City
Standards including the walls.
10) The existing overhead utilities on the project side of 19th Street shall
be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or
occupancy, whichever occurs first.
11) Revise existing Street Improvement Plans, prepared by a registered
Civil Engineer, to reflect the required public improvements, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
12) Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the
public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
13) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall
be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City
Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required.
14) For on-site sump conditions the private drainage facilities shall be
designed to handle Q100 and a secondary overflow shall be provided
to handle Q100 if the sump inlet is clogged.
Environmental Mitigation Measures
· CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
August 4, 1999
Page 5
1 ) A final acoustical report addressing traffic noise shall be submitted for
City Planner review and approval, prior to the issuance of building
permits. The final report shall discuss methods to reduce the level of
interior noise to below 45 CNEL and the building materials and
construction techniques provided. The acoustical engineer shall
submit written verification of the adequacy of the mitigation measures
included in the construction building plans.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit 99-08
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT: Curry Brandaw Architects
LOCATION: SEC Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __/__/__
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __/__/__
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if __1__1__
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
o.f approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development
Code regulations.
SC - 4119199 '1
Project No. CUP 99-08
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions __/__/
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/ /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/ /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __/ /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/__/__
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved __/__/__
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and __/__/__
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be __/__/__
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, __/__/__
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __/__/__
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior
to the issuance of building permits.
12. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. Arty further modifications to the site __/__/__
including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior
of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction
of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic
Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval.
13. As on the su~bmitted Site Plan 'A', six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the /__/__
project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith
effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify,
by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/
fences along the project's perimeter.
SC - 4/19t99 2
Project No. CUP 99-08
Completion Date
Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __I !
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, __t__1__
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the
rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet.
7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of
the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle
storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a
minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required
exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off
to the higher' whole number.
8. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for __1__t
commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
F. Landscaping
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case o.f residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
SC - 4/19199 3
Project No. CUP 99-08
Completion Date
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in / /
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
3. A minimum of 20% of trees p}anted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within __/ /
commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.
4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking __/__/__
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one __/__/
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:'1__/__/__
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater __/__/__
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. if. of slope area, 1-gatIon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to, soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included __/__/__
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10, All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment, If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
11, Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of __1__1__
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19,16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
SC - 4;19199 4
Project No. CUP 994)8
Completion Date
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
H. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate~ verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00. prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of atl mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Sa(d program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __1__1__
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approva~ prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. Site Development
1~ Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be __/__/__
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building
and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
Prior to issuance of building permits for the retirement building, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City
Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees, and School Fees.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition __/__/__
to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.
SC - 4119199 5
Project No. CUP99-05
Completion Date
Such fees may inctude, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee,
School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and / /
prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __/__/__
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday.
K. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering __/__/__
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Roofing material shall be installed as for wind-resistant roof covering at wind velocity not less __/__/
than 90 mph.
3. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental / /
Health Services prior to issuance of building permits.
L. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __/__/__
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __/__/__
perform such work.
3. 'the final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. __/__/__
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
M. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. __/ /__
2. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along bus bays, to provide a minimum of 7 feet __/ /__
measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the bus bay, a parallel
street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
N. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped __/ /__
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
SC - 4/19/99 6 ~,~,L~,,~
Project No, CUP99-08
Completion Date
Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Corem Median Classll Other
Slreet Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Bike
Trail
19th Street / / ,/ ,/ (e)
Hermosa Avenue ,/ ,/ / ,/ (e)
Hamilton Street ,/ / ,/ (e)
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) Traffic signage and striping including "No Parking Anytime" signs.
3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: 19th
Street.
O. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
P. Utilities
I. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __/__/__
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __/__/__
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
Q. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /__
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
SC - 41~9/99 7
Project No. CUP 99-08
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
R. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer __
shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or
consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the
development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation
of the final map occurs.
2. Fire flow requirement shall be 2,500 gallons per minute. __ __/
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __
personnel .prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test ofthe on-site hydrants shall __/__/__
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __/__/__
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.)~ Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/__/
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be __/__/__
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final __/__/__
inspection.
7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
a. Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/__/__
b. Other: 1994 UBC. / /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/__/__
sprinkler system.
9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
a. Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/__/__
SC - 4119199 8
Project No. CUP 99-08
Completion Date
b. California Code Regulations Title 24. / /
10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / /
a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. / /
b. Other~ Contact Fire Department for access requirements. / /
11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. / /
12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. / /
13. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear __/__/
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements.
14. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, __/__/__
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
a. Standard Directory in main lobby. __/__/
16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall __/__/__
be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
17. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire __/__/__
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety __/__/__
Division for the proper form letter.
19. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per"plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
20. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, __/__/__
IJPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. __1__1__
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shalt have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/__/__
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
SC - 4./19199 9
Project No. CUP99-08
Completion Date
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. __/__/
T. Security Hardware
1. A secondary' locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. __/__/__
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within /__/__
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, /__/__
or alarmed.
U. Security Fencing
1. When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since __/ /__
fire and law enforcement can access these devices.
V. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted __/ /__
from frame or track in any manner.
W. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime __/ /__
visibility.
2. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with __/ /__
vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address
numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so
indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign
Permit and approval by the Planning Division.
3. All developments shall submit a 8 ~" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant __/ /__
developments to the Police Department.
X. Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and __/ /
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in
turn save dollars and lives.
SC - 4/19/99 10 %-~ '7
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent LeCount, AICP, Associate Planner
Darice Sebring, Planning Aide
SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An
amendment regarding the filing of applications, and sign copies on monument signs.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval through adoption of the attached Ordinance.
ABSTRACT
An amendment to add provisions restricting the filing of the same or a similar application within a one-year
period and to require an 8~inch minimum letter height for sign copy on monument signs.
BACKGROUND
At its June 23, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Sign Ordinance
Amendment. There was no public input at the meeting and the Commission unanimously recommended
approval of the proposed amendment. The amendment will prohibit the filing of a sign application that
is substantially the same as a previously denied application within one-year. Unlike development
applications, such as Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permits, the City's Sign Ordinance sets
no limit on how often the same application can be submitted once denied. The proposed amendment
would also establish an 8-inch minimum letter height for monument signs for legibility. Monument signs
with letters less than 8 inches have proven to be difficult to read by passing motorists. (See Exhibits "A"
and "B"/.
CORRESPONDENCE
The item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper.
Respectfully su bmitt~d,
City Planner
BB:BLC:DS:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 23, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Resolution 99-62
Ordinance
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 23, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent LeCount, Associate Planner
Darice Sebring, Planning Aide
SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An
amendment to restrict the submittal of the same application within 12 months and
require eight inch minimum lettering be placed on all monument signs.
BACKGROUND: At the May 12, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission expressed
concern that the Sign Ordinance does not prohibit the filing of a sign application that is substantially
the same as a previously denied sign application. The Commission requested that staff bring
forward a Sign Ordinance amendment that would preclude the filing of a sign application that is
substantially the same as a previously denied sign application within 12 months of the denial.
In addition to this most recent request of the Planning Commission, staff is also forwarding a request
to set a minimum eight inch letter size for copy on monument signs. This recommendation is
supported by previous discussions of the Sign Task Force and the City Council. The
recommendation is to require an eight inch minimum letter height for monument signs, replacing the
current text which reads "recommend an eight inch minimum".
ANALYSIS: The Sign Ordinance does not restrict how frequently an applicant can file a new
application following a denial or revocation. The Development Code has provisions that preclude
the filing of a Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Design Review, etc., for one year following denial
of the same or substantially the same applications on the same or substantially the same site. The
proposed amendment to the Sign Ordinance is patterned after the language of the Development
Code.
The Sign Ordinance suggests an eight inch minimum letter height for monument sign letters. The
amendment would establish eight inch high letters as the minimum standard. The purpose of such
a standard is to ensure that monument signs are legible to passing motorists. Letters smaller than
eight inches were determined too small to be easily read by traveling motorists. Although several
factors influence the legibility of a sign, including letter style, color, daytime versus nighttime, the
primary factor is letter size. Studies conducted by the National Electrical Sign Association found that
eight inch letters have a visibility of up to 350 feet (Exhibit "B"). The proposed amendment is
consistent with the goal of the Sign Ordinance which is to "direct persons to various activities and
enterprises, in order to provide for the maximum public convenience."
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
SOA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 23, 1999
Page 2
Revisions are as follows:
· Section 14.12.080 New Applications following Denial or Revocation. Following the denial
or revocation of a Sign Permit application, no application for a Sign Permit for the same or
substantially the same use on the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within
one year from the date of denial or revocation.
· Section 14.20.080, and 14.20.100 Permitted Signs Residential, Commercial, Office, and
Industrial Zones. Monument sign letter height shall be a minimum of eight inches high.
· Section 14.24 Design Standards. Signs shall be legible. Signs should be clearly organized,
simple, and designed with sufficient contrast with their background. The use of extremely
ornamental or fancy script type styles (i.e., font) should be discouraged.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution recommending approval to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB: BL/DS:taa
Attachment:: Exhibit "A" - Monument Sign Example
Exhibit "B" - Sign Visibility Chart
Resolution recommending approval to the City Council
Proposed City Council Ordinance
.3//
MLegibility ~jt,.cej listed in t~ts
uail ~ ~pro~tdy I~ Let~ Height Vialblll~
~th va~o~ color combtna- 2"
~~st~ studira indi~ ~t in no~ daylight, a ~n with 20/ ~o~ M~mum dlstan~ t. 3' 1~'
20 ~gon a~ who is st~ding s~11, ~n ~d one inch ~gh lette~ color ~ula bt RED or BMCK
4' 1~'
~m a s~ard ~e ~a~ at a dism~ of ~ f~ ~s repents on WH~ back~un~ ~se
ide~ ~i~o~ ~te~ing le, er heights for ~rds on ~ fi~s ~ ba~d on N.E.S~. . 6" 2~'
w~ch a~ to ~ ~ad by ~am wal~ng by, or f~m motor tests co~d~aed i, I970. ~ ~ 8~
v~id~ ~ui~ addifio~ ad~s~nts: a ~ner~ ~le of linch 9'
l~ter height ~r ~ f~t of ~e~ng di~ for capi~ le,e~ in a lg' 4~'
simple ~le (~ch ~ Helvetica) would ~ cl~r to ~e si~ 12'
15"
~ul~. ~p in ~ t~t ~e ~m ~mplex ~e le,efing s~le (i.e.,
t~ ~m o~) ~e ~re diffi~lt it ~11 ~ to read, ~ ~ one 18' 7~'
s~Md ~m~te for tMs by increasing t~ ~ of ~e letter. 24~
30'
Two other favors aff~ting l~bili~ a~ eye level and field of ~sion. ~"
~ av~a~ height of a ~tfi~'s eye is appm~tely 5 f~t ~m 42"
~ound level, w~le ~at of a d~ver B 3 f~t 6 i~h~ A ~n's 48" 2~
noel field of ~4sion for ~ading ~gm m~m~ a ~ne ~ve~ng ~"
an ~gle of ~ d~. Si~ ~ ou~ide of ~is ~ne of ~Ssion ~"
mnnot e~fly ~ read. ~bili~ for ~ ~tofisl is al~ aff~t~ by
their ~ and the numar of ~s ~m~fing for ~eir attention.
Legibility doesn't necessarily depend on the size of either the sign or
its lettering. Smaller signs which are better organized, simple in
choice and organization of layout, are more likely to succeed at
communication. Signs which are designed to be read from moving
vehicles are usually too large to be read in comfort by those on foot.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
MONUMENT SIGNS AND TO RESTRICT SUBMITTAL OF SAME
APPLICATIONS WITHIN 12 MONTHS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has flied an application for Sign Ordinance
Amendment 99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Sign Ordinance Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 23rd day of June 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial ev;dence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headrig on June 23, 1999, including written and graf staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned
urban community within the District that is supedor to development otherwise allowable under
alternate regulations; and
b. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner
consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies
of the City.
c. The amendment will meet the purpose and intent of Title 14 of the Municipal
Code.
d The amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300 as it is not defined as a project per
Section 15378.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-62
SOA 99-01 .- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 23, 1999
Page 2
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of amendments to the Sign Ordinance Amendment
No. 99-01 to read as follows:
Section 14.12.080 New Applications followinq Denial or Revocation. Following the denial
or revocation of a Sign Permit application, no application for a Sign Permit for the same or
substantially the same use on the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year
from the date of denial or revocation.
Section 14.20.080 Permitted Siqns Residential, C,,ommerciat, Office, and Industrial Zones
Class 2.3, 5, 6. - c. Monument sign letter height shall be a minimum of eight inches.
Section 14.20.100 Permitted Siqns - Commerciar, Office, and Industrial Zones Class 2.- c.
Monument sign letter height shall be a minimum of eight inches.
Section 14.24.100 Si_qn Legibility. Signs shall be legible. Signs should be cleady organized,
simple, and designed with sufficient contrast with their background. The use of extremely
ornamental or fancy script type styles (i.e., font) is discouraged. For monument signs, a minimum
eight inch letter height shall be used.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE 1999 .
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
· // L~,~ T. McN~el, Chairman
ATTEST:
Bra
l, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of June 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MAC[AS, MANNERINO, MCNtEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MONUMENT SIGNS AND
TO RESTRICT SUBMITTAL OF SAME APPLICATION WITHIN
12 MONTHS.
A. Recitals..
1. On June 23, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-62,
recommending that the City Council adopt said amendment.
2. On August 4, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and
concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Sign Ordinance.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Chapter 14.12, Section 14.12.080and 14.20.100is hereby amended to read
as follows, and all subsequent sections are renumbered accordingly:
Section 14.12.080. New Applications followinq Denial or Revocation. Following the
denial or revocation of a Sign Permit application, no application for a Sign Permit for the
same or substantially the same sign on the same or substantially the same site shall be
filed within one-year from the date of denial or revocation.
Section 14.20.080. Permitted Signs Residential, Commercial, Office: and Industrial
Zones Class 2, 3, 5, 6.-c. Monument sign letter height shall be a minimum of 8 inches.
Section 14.20.100. Permitted Signs - Commercial, Office, and Industrial Zones Class
2.-c. Monument sign letter height shall be a minimum of 8 inches.
SECTION 2: Section 14.24.100 is hereby added to Chapter 14.24 to read as follows:
Section 14.24.100. Siqn Le.qibility. Signs shall be legible. Signs should be clearly
organized, simple, and designed with sufficient contrast with their background. The use
of extremely ornamental or fancy script type styles (i.e., font) is discouraged. For
monument signs, a minimum 8-inch letter height shall be used.
SECTION 3: This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15300 as it is not defined as a project per Section 15378.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SOA 99-01- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August4,1999
Page 2
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be
declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSEl:), APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999.
CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSlON'S
DECISION REGARDING A WALL SIGN .- FUNCOLAND - A request to display a
multicolor wall sign within Terra Vista Town Center, located at 10730 Foothill
Boulevard, Suite 140 - APN: 1077-421-75.
RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant has dropped their appeal. No action is needed from the Council. Attached is a copy
of the letter from Funcoland.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Henderson, AICP
Principal Planner
LH:NF\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Funcoland dated July 28, 1999.
J /7
July 28, 1999
Mr. Brad Buller
City of Ranoho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 91729
fax (909) 477-2847
Re: FunroLand #328 - Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Dear Mr. Buller:
At this time, Funco, Inc, wishes to drop its appeal for the muiti-col~ signage at the FuncoLande
located in Terra Vista Town Center. I will instruct our sign company to pursue a permit for a sin0k>
color red sign. Upon permit approval, we will begin fabricating the sign. Please keep in mind this is
not our corporate standard sign so the fabrication and installation will take ~een three and four
weeks. Your patience during this transition will be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (612) 946-7206.
Sincerely,
Funco, Inc,
Karen J. Seq~ra ~
Real Estate/~,dministrator
cc: Greg Hoxworth, Lewis Homes
Steve Berryman, US Signs
Funco, inc, - 10 ! 20 W. 76th Street · MmneapoU:~, MN 55344 · ~ (612) 946-3'222 · Fax (6 i 2) 946-8136
TOTAL P. 81
CITY OF RANC}tO CUCAMONGA
STAFF .REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
T'O: iMayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approval of an Ordinance of the City Council of the CiW of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, amending Chapter 3.48 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code to Reduce the Utili~ User's Fees
Recommendation:
Staff recommends City Council approval of utility user's fee reduction.
Background:
In May 1995, a systematic formula was adopted to phase out the utility user's fee beginning in fiscal
year 1996/97.. The proposed reductions were discussed in the most recent budget workshops and
adopted by Council in the fiscal year 1999/2000 budget with provisions for specific fee reductions.
This amendment to the ordinance requires two readings with an effective date of August 31, 1999.
The utility user's fee will be reduced from 3.48% to 3.08%, or 11.49%. Also the maximum annual
fee is reduced from $25,140 to $22,170, or 11.81% for industrial/business users.
Respectfully ,,submitted,
Lai~~ren~e i. i,~ lpl~e~
Administrative Services Director
h: ItlaynelCity Council staff reportsl UUT reduction. wpd
ORDINANCE NO. 558-C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY
USER'S FEES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 3.48.035.A ofthe Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
"A. The maximum aggregate amount of the fees imposed by this
chapter upon any one service user for utilities during any
calendar year shall not exceed ~' ..... ,.. ~;.
u.._.~.^., ~.~ ~_.,.. ~,_~,~.~ ,~.,~= ~ A,~ ,~,~ Twenty Two
Thousand, One-Hundred and Seventy Dollars
($ 22,170.00)."
SECTION 2: Section 3.48.040.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
"A. There is imposed a fee on the amounts paid for any intrastate
telephone services by every person in the City using such
services. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate
.... ~, ....... ~ ...... j 3.08 percent (3.08%) of the
charges made for such services, and shall be paid by the
person paying for such services."
SECTION 3: Section 3.48.050.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
There is imposed a fee upon every person using electrical
energy in the City. The fee imposed by this section shall be
at the rate of° ~° ...... ''° ~°°'~
.... ~,~,,,~,,, ~ .......~ 3.08 percent (3.08%) of
the charges made for such energy by an electrical
corporation providing service in the City and shall be paid by
the person using the energy. The fee applicable to electrical
energy provided by a non-utility supplier shall be determined
by applying the fee rate to the equivalent charge the service
user would have incurred if the energy used had been
provided by the electrical corporation franchised by the City.
Non-utility suppliers shall install and maintain an appropriate
utility-type metering system which will enable compliance with
this section. 'Charges,' as used in this section, means
Ordinance No. 558-C
Page 2
charges made for: (1) metered energy and (2) minimum
charges for service, including customer charges, service
charges, demand charges, standby charges, and all other
annual and monthly charges, fuel or other cost adjustments
authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission or the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission."
SECTION 4: Section 3.48.060.A.1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read, in words and figures, as follows:
"A.1. There is imposed a fee upon every person in the City, other than
a gas corporation or electrical corporation, using gas in the City
which is transported through mains or pipes or by mobile
transport. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate of
.... ~, ....... ~ ...... j 3.08 percent (3.08%) of the charges
made for the gas and shall be paid by the person using the gas.
The fee applicable to gas or gas transportation provided by non-
utility suppliers shall be determined by applying the fee rate to
the equivalent charges the service user would have incurred if
the gas or gas transportation had been provided by the gas
corporation franchised by the City."
SECTION 5: Section 3.48.070.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
"A. There is imposed a fee upon every person in the city using water
which is delivered through mains or pipes. The fee imposed by this
section shall be at the rate of ....
~ ......~ 3.08 percent
(3.08%) of the charges made for such water and shall be paid by the
person paying for such water."
SECTION 6: Section 3.48.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
"A. Whenever the calculation of the amount of any fee due and owing
under this chapter is alleged to have resulted in an overpayment or
a payment more than once, it may be refunded by the Finance
Director as provided in t~-a-seetio~ subsections "B" and "C" of
this section, provided a claim in writing therefor, stating under
penalty of perjury the specific grounds upon which the claim is
founded, is filed with the Finance Director within one year of the date
of the claimed overpayment. The claim shall be on forms furnished
by the Finance Director.
Ordinance No. 558-C
Page 3
"B. A service supplier may claim a refund or take as credit against fees
collected and remitted an amount overpaid or paid more than once
when it is established that the person from whom the fee has been
collected did not owe the fee.
"C. Any service user may obtain a refund of fees overpaid or paid
more than once by filing a claim in the manner provided in
subsection "A" of this section, but only when the service user
having paid the fee to the service supplier establishes to the
satisfaction of the Finance Director that the service user has
been unable to obtain a refund from the service supplier who
collected the fee."
"D. Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, whenever a
service supplier, pursuant to an order of the California Public
Utilities Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction, makes a
refund to service users of charges for past utility services, the fees
paid pursuant to this chapter on the amount of such refunded
charges shall also be
retuff~ entitled to claim a credit for such refunded fees against
the amount of fee which is due upon the next monthly returns.
In the event this chapter is repealed, the amounts of any
refundable fees will be borne by the City."
SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be deemed effective on ,,,, ........ 15 ..... August 31, 1999.
SECTION 8: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or preempted
by subsequent legislation, such decision or legislation shall not effect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are declared unconstitutional or
preempted.
SECTION 9: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be
published in the manner prescribed by law.
Ordinance No. 558-C
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1999.
AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERKof the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of August, 1999, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18~" day of August, 1999.
Executed this 19t" day of August, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1999
TO: Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. Alexander and James V. Curatalo
City Council Library Subcommittee
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SUBCOMMITTEE'S APPOINTMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE LIBRARY BOARD OF
TRUSTEES AND LIBRARY FOUNDATION
Recommendation
The City Council approve the re-appointments of Joyce Womack and Donna
Bradshaw to the Library Board of Trustees and the re-appointment of Patricia
Beasley and appointment of Amy Warshaw to the Library Foundation.
Background
We met as the Library Subcommittee on July 1, 1999 to discuss filling the terms
for the Library Board of Trustees, and we recommend the two incumbents, Joyce
Womack and Donna Bradshaw, be re-appointed.
We also met on July 13, 1999 to discuss filling the terms for the Library
Foundation. One incumbent, Patricia Beasley, asked to be re-appointed, and we
received one application from Amy J. Warshaw. We recommend Patricia Beasley
be re-appointed and Amy Warshaw be appointed.
There will still be two vacancies on the Library Foundation at this time, but we
recommend we fill the vacancies we can at this time and re-advertise at the end of
summer.
Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted,
William J. ?r~[exander .'James V. Curatalo
City Couri"~:il Library Subcommitte~/"City Council Library Subcommittee