The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009/06/15 - Agenda Packet - Special AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Monday, June 15, 2009 C 6:00 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga City Hall � Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive � Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 A. CALL TO ORDER 1 . Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Chairman/President/Mayor Kurth Vice Chairman/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tern Michael Agency/Board/Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board or City Council may receive testimony and set the matterfor a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. 1 C. CONSENT CALENDAR - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. C1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO EXPEND FUNDS FOR LAND AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA (P1) RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-011(P2) A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITTING ITS RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD C2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 (P5) RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-012 (P7) A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET C3. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND SETTING THE INTEREST RATE ON THE LOAN, AS WELL AS INTER-FUND LOANS (P9) D. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. D1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (P10) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-024 (P11) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2 D2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE NEW SALARY RESOLUTION FOR FIRE DISTRICT EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2009 - 2010 (P13) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-025 (P14) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 - 2010 E. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Theywill be acted upon bythe City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. E1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO EXPEND FUNDS FOR LAND AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA (P20) RESOLUTION NO. 09-123 (P21) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITTING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD E2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (P24) RESOLUTION NO. 09-124 (P25) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E3. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND SETTING THE INTEREST RATE ON THE LOAN, AS WELL AS INTER-FUND LOANS (P27) E4. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE NEW SALARY RESOLUTION FOR CITY EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 - 2010 (P28) 3 RESOLUTION NO. 09-125 (P29) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. F1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015 (P37) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-026 (P43) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES,AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015 G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. G1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,146,750 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 15, 2009 (P57) G2. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 GENERAL FUND'S ARTICLE X111B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT (P58) RESOLUTION NO.FD 09-027 (P59) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 G3. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,843,540 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (P61) 4 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-028 (P63) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 G4. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 (P65) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-029 (P67) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 G5. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1 (P70) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-030 (P71) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION G6. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,574,380 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,375,447 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 88-1 (P73) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-031 (P75) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 5 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-032 (P79) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. H1. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET AND ARTICLE X111 B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT (P81) RESOLUTION NO. 09-126 (P83) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 09-127 (P85) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 I. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McNay,Assistant City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 11, 2009, per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. 6 P1 STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO . EXPEND FUNDS FOR LAND AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached Resolution, which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend Agency funds on public improvements that are of benefit to the Project Area. BACKGROUND Health and Safety Code Section 33445 requires both the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council adopt Resolutions that indicate the intent on spending Agency funds on land and public improvements (including buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements that are to be, publicly owned). ANALYSIS The attached Resolution complies with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33445 and makes the necessary findings: that the projects are of benefit to the Project Area; there is no other reasonable means of financing the projects; and the improvements will assist in the elimination of blight within the Project Area. The Resolution includes Appendix 1, which outlines the public improvement projects that the Agency plans to fund. This item also appears on the City Council agenda. Respectfully submitted, 00. Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Attachment: 33445 Resolution P2 Q RESOLUTION NO.�q _ U I A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING ITS RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD A. Recitals. (i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies, contains Section 33445 which provides that a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, may pay all or part of the value of land for and the cost of installation and construction of any buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements which are publicly owned either within or without a project area, . upon a determination by such agency and such legislative body by resolution that such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements are of benefit to such project area; that no other means of financing the same are available to the community; and, that the payment of funds for same will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area. (ii) The officially adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"), including all amendments, provides in part for the construction of these community and cultural facilities to serve said project area. (iii) Attached as Appendix "1" is a document which provides for the Agency's funding of certain capital projects from tax increment resources in estimated amounts (the "Public Projects"). (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution related to the Public Projects have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: Section 1. This Agency hereby finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Section 2. The Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that the construction of the Public Projects and this Agency's funding thereof as specified in Appendix "I" hereto will be of benefit to this Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project. Section 3. This Council hereby specifically finds and determines that no other reasonable means of financing is available to the community to construct the Public P3 Projects other than through this Agency's funding thereof in the amounts specified in Appendix "I" hereto. Section 4. This Agency hereby specifically finds that the financial obligations that it will undertake to construct the Public Projects will not impair its ability to discharge any financial obligation previously undertaken by it with respect to its Rancho Redevelopment Project. Section 5. This Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that the construction of the Public Projects specified in Appendix "1" and this Agency's funding thereof will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area and is consistent with this Agency's implementation plan adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33490. Section 6. The Chairman and Executive Director of this Agency hereby are authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to cause this Agency to fund the construction of the Public Projects, and any and all funds heretofore expended by this Agency for that purpose hereby are ratified. Section 7. The Executive Director shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary I, JACK LAM, SECRETARY, of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council, held on the 15th day of June, 2009. Executed this 16th day of June, 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Jack Lam, Secretary P4 APPENDIX 1 Project Location Estimated Cost Anticipated Source(s) of Funding Hellman Avenue Foothill to south of $16.8 million Tax Increment MPSD Sixth Street at Hellman Tax Allocation Bond Funds Avenue Apparatus Garage Banyan Fire Station $1 million Tax Increment Addition Tax Allocation Bond Funds Fire Storage and Jersey Fire Station $1 million Tax Increment Warehouse Tax Allocation Bond.Funds Etiwanda Train Depot East side of Etiwanda, $3 million Tax Increment Preservation north of Base Line Tax Allocation Bond Funds Road Southbound I-15 I-15 Freeway $1.5 million Tax Increment Deceleration Lane at southbound at Foothill Tax Allocation Bond Funds Foothill Boulevard Boulevard North End Public West side of Milliken, $3 million Tax Increment Safety Facility north of Banyan Tax Allocation Bond Funds P5 rG T H E C I T Y O F ... ... . . RANCHO C U C A M ONCA Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director SUBJECT: Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's Annual Budget for fiscal year 2009/2010. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Resolution authorizing the fiscal year budget in the amount of $168,078,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposed FY 2009/2010 Redevelopment Agency budget has been previously submitted to the Board and was reviewed during the workshop held on June 4, 2009. The Agency has several types of Funds: Administrative and Project Funds; restricted ("Pass-Through") accounts subject to Agency agreements; and special Trustee Funds which have been established to handle transactions on either bond or loan programs which have been established by the Redevelopment Agency. How do these funds work? The Redevelopment Agency receives tax increment from the County of San Bernardino. The Agency, in turn, places these monies into the restricted Pass-Through Funds according to the percentages provided by, the County Auditor-Controller's Office. Funds received in the Pass- Through accounts are either restricted for specific purposes such as affordable housing, fire protection facilities, or regional storm drain capital improvements; paid to the taxing entity pursuant to the Pass-Through agreement in the cases of sewer,, water and non-reclaimable water; or are transferred to the Trustee for payment to debt service on bonds sold by the Agency in prior years. Project and Administration Fund accounts operate with revenues derived from loans, fund transfers, proceeds of bonds, interest income, and other revenue sources that are specifically designated for project implementation. These project funds offer more flexibility in terms of implementation of programs established by the Redevelopment Agency because they are not restricted by prior Pass-Through Agreements, which were established with other taxing entities at the time the Project Area was adopted. Additionally, as specified in Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3(d), the Agency has determined that the administrative expenses approved in the fiscal year 2009/10 budget are necessary for the production, improvement, and preservation of low- and moderate-income housing. P6 PAGE 2 STAFF REPORT- FY 2009/10 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET ADOPTION Because of the State's interest in redevelopment agency budgets, the Agency's auditor is recommending the Agency include the following policy in the budget resolution: The Agency reserve any fund equity for the projects applicable to each fund. In this way, the funds are classified as "reserved"funds, eliminating the possibility that the State could impound the excess revenues. This has no detrimental effect on the Agency budget, and is consistent with the recommendations of the California"Redevelopment Association. Respectfully submitted, e� o0, Linda Daniels Redevelopment Director Ij P7 RA RESOLUTION NO. - RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ADOPTING THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 BUDGET WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a workshop to review the appropriation requests for the fiscal year 2009/2010 on June 4, 2009 , and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a public hearing on the Agency's Annual Budget on this 15th day of June 2009, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency desires to adopt a policy relating to reserving fund equity; NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California does hereby resolve on this 15th day of June 2009, as follows: SECTION 1: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 BUDGET. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency budget for the fiscal year 2009/2010 on file in the office of the Finance Officer is hereby adopted in the amount of $168,078,000. SECTION 2: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN AND/OR WITHIN APPROPRIATIONS. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the budget. The Executive Director or designee may transfer funds between appropriations within any fund as set forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in the same fund. SECTION 3: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN FUNDS. Transfers of funds between funds as shown throughout the fund transfer sections of the budget shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers. SECTION 4: DISBURSEMENTS. The Executive Director, the Finance Officer or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the fiscal year 2009/2010 budget, and have the responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct expenditures by Agency members which require Agency approval. SECTION 5: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS. The Redevelopment Agency may amend this budget to add or delete appropriations. P8 SECTION 6: POLICY RELATING TO RESERVING FUND EQUITY. The Redevelopment Agency shall reserve all fund equity for projects applicable to each fund. SECTION 7: ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. As specified in Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3(d), the Agency has determined that the administrative expenses approved in the fiscal year 2009/10 budget arc:necessary for the production, improvement, and preservation of low- and moderate-income housing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Chairman ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2009. Executed this_day of June 2009, at . Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk - P9 lei } T H E C I T Y O F RAN CH O. C U C A M ONCA Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director SUBJECT: Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and setting the interest rate on the loan, as well as inter-fund loans. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan amount between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and setting the interest rate .on the loan, as well as inter-fund loans. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt, which will be repaid by the tax increment received. For this purpose, when the Project Area was established in Fiscal Year 1982/83, the City loaned money to the Redevelopment Agency in order to establish initial debt, as well as to provide monies for operations. The City and Agency have continued to maintain this loan agreement, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its full tax increment revenue. During fiscal year 2008/09, the Redevelopment Agency will pay to the City $7,500,000 toward the principal and interest on the City/Agency loan. At the same time, it is also necessary for the Agency to continue its loan agreement with the City in order for the Agency to implement its ongoing programs and projects. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to re-borrow the amount of $7,500,000 for the upcoming fiscal year. The interest rate on the total loan between the City and the Agency will be the highest rate permitted by law per Health & Safety Code 33645 and Government Code 53531. In addition, the interest rate for any continuing or new inter-fund loans of the Agency for the 2009/10 fiscal year will be will be the highest rate permitted by law. This item appears on both the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Agendas. Respectfully submitted, Daniels in niels Redevelopment Director , P10 R A N C H O C U C" A M O N G A PIKE PROTECTION DISTRICT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District FROM: Jack Lam, City Manager BY- Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Fire Board approved the attached resolution to reaffirm the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND The most recent fiscal audit conducted for the District was as of June 30, 2008. Annually, the Fire Board approves the attached resolution reaffirming the level of reserves included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) as of June 30, 2008. Respectfully s mitted, Jac gLamA�j City Manager klfinanceWudget20101City Council staff reportslreaffirming level of reserves-Fire District 09-10.doc 1311 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation, and; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino County, California, does hereby resolve on this 151h day of June 2009 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as stated in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report dated June 30, 2008 are hereby reaffirmed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15`h day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P12 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 2 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk i.-Vinancelbudget20091City Council staff reportslresolution reaffirming level of reserves-City 08-09.doc P13 MEMORANDUM RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT _ RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Service Subject: Approval of Resolution No. FD 09- Adopting the New Salary Resolution for Fire District Employees for Fiscal Years 2009-2010 Recommendation It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the attached resolution adopting the new salary schedules and salary ranges for all Fire District employees for fiscal year 2009-2010. Background Staff and the Fire District's bargaining groups.have met and conferred for fiscal year 2009-2010. Most of the bargaining groups have negotiated a one-year labor contract that provides for a.zero percent (0%) cost of living adjustment (COLA). The attached Salary Resolution implements the negotiated salary provision of zero COLA for fiscal year 2009-2010, and makes other technical revisions to the salary schedules to ensure consistency with the FY 2009-2010 budget and state and federal law. Attachments P14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09 L A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ATTACHED SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other.policies for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary . ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve .the attached salary schedules for the Fire Union, Fire Management Employees Group and Fire Support Services Association. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, MD, President ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, Secretary P15 Resolution No. FD FIRE UNION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 19 2009 A B C D E FIRE CAPTAIN . 27.64 29.02 30.47 32.00 33.59 Hourly 3,095.51 3,250.29 3,412.80 3,583.44 3,762.61 Bi-Weekly 6,706.94 7,042.29 7,394.40 7,764.12 8,152.33 Monthly FIRE ENGINEER 23.56 24.74 25.97 27.27 28.64 Hourly 2,638.52 2,770.45 2,908.97 3,054.42 3,207.14 Bi-Weekly 5,716.80 6,002.64 6,302.77 6,617.91 6,948.81 Monthly FIREFIGHTER 20.59 21.62 22.70 23.83 25.03 Hourly 2,306.00 2,421.31 2,542 37 2,669.49 2,802.96 Bi-Weekly 4,996.34 5,246.16 5,508.47 5,783.89 6,073.09 Monthly FIRE INSPECTOR 23.56 24.74 25.97 27.27 28.64 Hourly 2,638.52 2,770.45 2,908.97 3,054.42 3,207.14 Bi-Weekly 5,716.80 6,002.64 6,302.77 6,617.91 . 6,948.81 Monthly, FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 27.64- 29.02 30.47 32.00 33.59 Hourly 3,095.51 3,250.29 3,412.80 3,583.44 3,762.61 Bi-Weekly 6,706.94 7,042.29 7,394.40 7,764.12 8,152.33 Monthly HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STIPEND (5% of Fire Enqr. Step E) 1.43 1.43 1.43 .1.43 1.43 Hourly 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 Bi-Weekly 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 Monthly PARAMEDIC STIPEND (12.13% of Fire Enqr. Step E) 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 Hourly 389.03 389.03 389.03 389.03 389.03 Bi-Weekly 842.89 842.89 842.89 842.89 842.89 .Monthly CANINE STIPEND (5% of Fire Engr. Step E) 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 Hourly 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 .160.36 Bi-Weekly 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 Monthly P16 Resolution No. FD FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 19 2009 A B C D E F SAFETY FIRE CHIEF 68.94 72.39 76.01 79.81 83.80 87.99 Hourly 5,515.51 5,791.29 6,080.86 6,384.90 6,704.14 7,039.35 Bi-Weekly 11,950.28 12,547.80 13,175.19 13,833.95 14,525.64 15,251.92 Monthly FIRE DEPUTY CHIEF 59.40 62.36 65.48 68.76 72.20 75.80 Hourly 4,751.61 4,989.19 5,238.65 5,500.58 5,775.61 6,064.40 Bi-Weekly 10,295.16 10,809.92 11,350.41 11,917.92 12,513.83 13,139.53 Monthly FIRE BATTALION.CHIEF 36.98 38.82 40.77 42.80 44.94 N/A (56 Hour Workweek) 4,141.29 4,348.36 4,565.77 4,794.06 5,033.77, 8,972.80 9,421.44 9,892.51 10,387.14 10,906.49 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 51.77 54.35 57.07 59.93 62.92 N/A (40 Hour Workweek) 4,141.29 4,348.36 4,565.77 4,794.06 5,033.77 8,972.80 9,421,44 9,892.51 10,387.14 10,906.49 P17 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1 , 2009 A B C D E COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.96 Bi-Weekly 4,226.27 4,437.60 4,659.47 4,892.44 5,137.07 Monthly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 37.51 39.38 41.35 43.42 45.59 Hourly ADMINISTRATOR 3,000.67 3,150.71 3,308.24 3,473.65 3,647.34 Bi-Weekly 6,501.46 6,826.53 7,167.86 7,526.25 7,902.56 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 Hourly 1,857.70 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.53 2,258.05 Bi-Weekly 4,025.02 4,226.27 4,437.59 4,659.47 4,892.45 Monthly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 Hourly TECHNICIAN 1,850.93 1,943.47 2,040.64 2,142.68 2,249.81 Bi-Weekly 4,010.34 4,210.85 4,421.40 4,642.47 4,874.59 Monthly FIRE MARSHAL 43.93 46.12 48.43 50.85 53.39 Hourly 3,514.19 3,689.90 3,874.39 4,068.12 4,271.52 Bi=Weekly 7,614.08 7,994.78 8,394.52 8,814.25 9,254.96 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 Hourly INSPECTION 1 1,959.35 2,057.32 2,160.19 2,268.20 2,381.61 Bi-Weekly 4,245.26 4,457.52 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.15 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 27.00 28.35, . 29.77 31.26 32.82 Hourly INSPECTION 11 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 Monthly MAINTENANCE OFFICER 34.92 36.67 38.50 40.42 42.45 Hourly 2,793.57 2,933.25 3,079.92 3,233.91 3,395.61 Bi-Weekly 6,052.74 6,355.38 6,673.15 7,006.81 7,357.16 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 32.04 33.64 35.33 37.09 38.95 Hourly 2,563.42 2,691.59 2,826.16 2,967.47 - 3;115.85 Bi-Weekly 5,554.07 5,831-77 6,123.35 6,429.53-- 6,751-00 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST 1 15.25 16.01 16.81 17.65 18.54 Hourly 1,220.01 1,281.01 1,345.06 1,412.31 1,482.93 Bi-Weekly 2,643.35 2,775.51 2,914.29 3,060.00 3,213.00 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 Hourly 1,347.97 1,415.36 1,486.13 1,560.44 1,638.46 Bi-Weekly 2,920.59 3,066.62 3,219.95 3,380.95 . . 3,550.00 Monthly P18 PLANS EXAMINER- FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 _ 38.99 Hourly 2.566.22 2,694.54 2,829.26 2,970.73 3,119.26 Bi-Weekly 5,560.15 5,838.16 6,130.07 6,436.57 6,758.39 Monthly PUBLIC EDUCATION 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 Hourly SPECIALIST 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 Monthly SECRETARY 19.09 20.04 21.04 22.09 23.20 Hourly 1,526.81 1,603.15 1,683.31 1,767.47 1,855.85 Bi-Weekly 3,308.09 3,473.50 3,647.17 3,829.53 4,021.00 Monthly SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE 24.49 25.73 27.01 28.36 29.77 Hourly SECRETARY 1,959.30 2,057.26 2,160.12 2,268.13 2,381.54 Bi-Weekly 4,245.15 4,457.40 4,680.27 4,914.29 5,160.00 Monthly P19 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION PART TIME POSITIONS - HOURLY RATES A B C D E FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 Hourly FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.44 Hourly TEMPORARY/PART-TIME QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 27.79 29.18 30.64 32.17 33.78 Hourly SPECIALIST P20 STAFF REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels', Redevelopment Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO EXPEND FUNDS FOR LAND AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE OF. BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached Resolution, which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend Agency funds on public improvements that are of benefit to the Project Area. BACKGROUND Health and Safety Code Section 33445 requires both the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council adopt Resolutions that indicate the intent on spending Agency funds on land and public improvements (including buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements that are to be publicly owned). ANALYSIS The attached Resolution complies with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33445 and makes the necessary findings: that the projects are of benefit to the Project Area; there is no other reasonable means of financing the projects; and the improvements will assist in the elimination of blight within the Project Area. The Resolution includes Appendix 1, which outlines the public improvement projects that the Agency plans to fund. This item also appears on the Redevelopment Agency agenda. Respectfully submitted, "0. � Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Attachment: 33445 Resolution RESOLUTION NO. I Z3 . P21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD A. Recitals. (i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies, contains Section 33445 which provides that a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, may pay all or part of the value of land for and the cost of installation and construction of any buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements which are publicly owned either within or without a project area, upon a determination by such agency and such legislative body by resolution that such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements are of benefit to such project area; that no other means of financing the same are available to the community; and, that the payment of funds for same,will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area. (ii) Attached as Appendix "V is a document which provides for the Agency's funding of certain capital projects from tax increment resources in estimated amounts (the "Public Projects"). (iii) The officially adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"), including all amendments, provides. in part for the construction of these community and cultural facilities to serve said project area. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution related to the Public Projects have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: Section 1. This Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby consents to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's funding of the costs and expenses related to the Public Projects specified in Appendix "1" hereto pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445. Section 3. This Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the construction of the Public Projects by and through Agency's funding will be of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project. P22 Section 4. The Council hereby specifically finds and detenmines that no other reasonable means of financing is available to the community to construct the Public Projects other than through the Agency's funding thereof and consented to herein. Section 5. This Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the construction of the Public Projects specified in Appendix "1" and this Agency's funding thereof will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area and is consistent with this Agency's implementation plan adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33490. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2009 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council, held on the 15th day of June, 2009. Executed this 16th day of June, 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P23 APPENDIX 1 Project Location Estimated Cost Anticipated Source(s) of Funding Hellman Avenue Foothill to south of $16.8 million Tax Increment MPSD Sixth Street at Hellman Tax Allocation Bond Funds Avenue Apparatus Garage Banyan Fire Station $1 million Tax Increment Addition Tax Allocation Bond Funds Fire Storage and Jersey Fire Station $1 million Tax Increment Warehouse Tax Allocation Bond Funds Etiwanda Train Depot East side of Etiwanda, $3 million Tax Increment Preservation north of Base Line Tax Allocation Bond.Funds Road Southbound I-15 I-15 Freeway $1.5 million Tax Increment Deceleration Lane at southbound at Foothill Tax Allocation Bond Funds Foothill Boulevard Boulevard North End Public West side of Milliken, $3 million Tax Increment Safety Facility I north of Banyan I Tax Allocation Bond Funds — P24 a T H E C I T. Y O F R A N C II O C U C A M O N C A Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, City Manager BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director . SUBJECT RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approved,the attached resolution to reaffirm the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND The most recent fiscal audit conducted for the City was as of June 30, 2008. Annually, the City Council approves the attached resolution reaffirming the level of reserves included in the Comprehensive Ann.ual Financial Report (CAFR) as of June 30, 2008. Respectfully su itted, am City Manager I:Ifinancelbudget20101City Council staff reportsveaffirming level of reserves-City 09-10.doc P25 RESOLUTION NO. 09- 1�2 y RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain the financial strength required to obtain beneficial bond ratings for the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 151h day of June 2009 that the level of fiscal, reserves maintained by the City of Rancho.Cucamonga as stated in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report dated June 30, 2008 are hereby reaffirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the funding goal for the Changes in Economic Circumstances reserve is hereby reaffirmed at a level of a minimum six- month operating reserve in the City's General Fund; the funding goal for.the City Facilities' Capital Repair reserve is 15% of capital assets value; and the funding goal of the Working Capital reserve is 5% of the City's General Fund budget for the upcoming fiscal year. _ P26 Resolution No. 09- Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15`h day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C..Reynolds, City Clerk i:Ifinance1budget20101City Council staff reportslresolution reaffirming level of reserves-City 09-10.doc P27 T H E C I T .Y O F R�:ait'"a�°s.:�""�"aa.. - ,"'�•,'.�.�':��lF:° '31`.,w�Ci�"..a;�°'.�'.'z� R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N C A Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 . TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director SUBJECT: Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho. Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and setting the interest rate on the loan, as well as inter-fund loans. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan amount between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment.Agency, and setting the interest rate on the loan, as well as inter-fund loans. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt, which will be repaid by the tax increment received. For this purpose, when the Project Area was established in Fiscal Year 1982/83, the City loaned money to the Redevelopment Agency in order to establish initial debt, as well as to provide monies for operations. The City and Agency have continued to maintain this loan agreement, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its full tax increment revenue. During fiscal year 2008/09, the Redevelopment Agency will pay to the City $7,500,000 toward the principal and interest on the City/Agency loan. At the same time, it is also necessary for the Agency to continue its loan agreement with the City in order for the Agency to implement its ongoing programs and projects. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to re-borrow the amount of $7,500,000 for the upcoming fiscal year., The interest rate on the total loan between the City and the Agency will be the highest rate permitted by law per Health & Safety Code 33645 and Government Code 53531. In addition, the interest rate for any continuing or new inter-fund loans of the Agency for the 2009/10 fiscal year will be will be the highest rate permitted by law. This item appears on both-the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Agendas. Respectfully submitted, inc in a Daniels Redevelopment Director P28 MEMORANDUM ADMINISTRATNE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic Subject: Approval of Resolution No. 09- Adopting the New Salary Resolution for City Employees for Fiscal Years 2009-2010 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting the new salary schedules and salary ranges for all City employees for fiscal year 2009-2010. Background Staff and the City's bargaining groups have met and conferred for fiscal year 2009-2010. Most of the bargaining groups have negotiated a one-year labor contract that provides for a zero percent (0%) cost of living adjustment (COLA). The attached Salary Resolution implements the negotiated salary provision of zero COLA for fiscal year 2009-2010, and makes other technical revisions to the salary schedules to ensure consistency with FY 2009-2010 budget and state and federal law. . Attachments Staff Report 2009 City Salary Reso 6-15-09.doc P29 RESOLUTION NO. 09- 12 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ATTACHED SALARY RANGES FOR 2009/2010, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary ranges and to permit the City Council to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System, the PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan, and to participate in the Executive Management Executive Wellness Plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, MD, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2009 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 7,310 1602 8,924 1632 10,364 Assistant City Clerk/ Records Mgr. 1514 . 5,754 1554 7,024 1584 8,158 Assistant City Manager 1637 10,626 1677 12,972 1707 15,066 Building &Safety Official 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 11,169 Community Services Director 1595 8,618 1635 10,521g1666 12,219 Deputy CityMana er/Admin.Serv. 1615 9,522 1655 11,624 13,500 DeputyCityMana er/Comm.Dev. 1615 9,522 1655 11,62413,500 En Svs Director/CityEngineer 1596 8,661 1636 10,57312,280 Finance Director 1597 8,704 1637 10,62612,341 Human Resources Director 1589 8,364 1629 10,21011,858 Libra Director 1579 7,957 1619 • 9,714 11,281 Plannin Director 1589- 8,364 1629 10,21011,858 Public Works Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 961711,169 Redevelopment Director. 1612 9,380 1652 11,452 1682 13,300 Fire Chief A 111,950.281 1 1 F 115,251.92 Executive Management Group July 2009 P31 Resolution No. GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2009 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 2,850 4415 3,480 4425 3,658 Account Technician 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Accountant# 3465 4,462 3505 5,448. 3515 5,726 Accounting Manager* 2525 6,019 2565 7,348 2575 7,724 Administrative Secretary' 4424 3,640 4464 4,443 4474 4,670 Administrative Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Animal Care Attendant 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Animal Caretaker 4378 2,893 4418 3,532 4428 3,713 Animal Care Supervisor# 4416 3,497 4456 4,269 4466 4,488 Animal Center Manager* 2506 1 5, 475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Animal Handler 4388 3,041 4428 . 3,713 4438 3,903 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 Animal Services Officer 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Assistant City Clerk# 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Assistant City Engineer* 2590 8,324 2630 10,162 2640 10,682 Assistant Electrician 5430 3,747 5470 4,574 5480 4,808 Assistant Engineer# 3488 5,005 3528 6,110 3538 6,422 Assistant Library Director* 2572 7,610 2612 9,290 2622 9,765 Assistant Planner# 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Assistant Planning Director* 2583 8,039 2623 9,814 2633 10,315 Assistant to the City Manager* 2548 6,751 2588 8,242 2598 8,663 Associate Engineer# 3518 5,813 3558 7,096 3568 7,459 Associate Planner# 3487 4,980 3527 6,079 3537 6,390 Benefits Technician 4399 3,213 4439 3,922 4449 4,123 Box Office Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Budget Analyst# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Building Inspection Su ervisor#Z 3504 5,421. 3544 6,617 3554 6,956 Building Inspector 2 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Business License Clerk 4378 2,893 4418 3,532 4428 3,713 Business License Inspector 4418 3,532 4458 4,312 4468 4,533 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 3,785 3472 4,621 3482 4,857 Business License Technician 4408 3,360 4448 4,102 4458 4,312 Buyer 1 4411 3,411 4451' 4,164 4461 4,377 Buyer II # 3433 3,804 3473 4,644 3483 4,882 Code Enforcement Officer 1 4441 1 3,962 4481 4,836 1 4491 5,084 General Employees Group July 2009 i J4' Code Enforcement Su ervisor#Z 3481 4,833 3521 5,900 3531 6,202 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 4,143- 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Programs Specialist 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Services Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Services Superintendent* 2536 6,359 1 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Community Services Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 3,748 3470 4,575 3480 4,809 Economic Development Manager* 2537 6,391 2577 7,802 2587 8,201 Engineering Aide 4421 3,585 4461 4,377 4471 4,601 Engineering Technician 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Environmental Programs Ins ectorz 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 6,455 2579 7,880 2589 8,283 Executive Assistant* 2460 4,353 2500 5,314 2510 5,585 Facilities Superintendent* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Fleet Su ervisor#z 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 GIS Analyst 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 GIS Technician 4436 3,864 4476 4,717 4486 4,958 GIS/Special District Manager* 2538 6,423 2578 7,841 2588 8,242 Housing Projects Manager 2537 6,391 2577 1 7,802 2587 8,201 Human Resources Officer* 2584 8,079 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Information Services Analyst 1# 3505 5,448 3545 6,650 3555 6,991 Information Services Analyst I1# 3520 5,871 3560 7,167 3570 7,534 Information Services Manager* 2584 8,079 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Information Services Projects Coord.# 3508 5,530 3548 6,751 3558 7,096 Information Services Specialist 1 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 Information Services Specialist II 4471 4,601 4511 5,617 4521 5,904 Librarian 1# 3435 1 3,842 3475 4,691 3485 4,930 Librarian 11# 3457 4,288 3497 5,235 3507 5,502 Library Assistant 1# 3373 2,820 3413 3,443 3423 3,619 Library Assistant II# 3414 3,460 3454 4,224 3464 4,440 Library Clerk 4356 2,593 4396 1 3,165 4406 3,327 Library Page 4244 1,483 4284 1,810 4294 1,903 Library Page II 4293 1 1,894 4333 2,312 4343 2,430 Library Services Manager* 2506 5,475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Maintenance Su ervisor#Z 3488 5,005 3528 6,110 . 3538 6,422 Management Aide 4440 3,942 4480 .4,812 4490 5,058 Management Analyst 1# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Management Analyst II# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Management Analyst III# 3515 5,726 3555 6,991 3565 7,348 Office Services Clerk 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 General Employees Group July 2009 2-3 Office Specialist 1 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Office Specialist II 4369 2,766 44.09 3,377 4419 3,550 Park/Landscape Maintenance Su tw2 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Personnel Clerk 4389 3,057 4429 3,731 4439 3,922 Personnel Services Coordinator# 3471 4,598 3511 5,613 3521 5,900 Plan Check & Inspection Manager` 2533 6,264 2573 7,648 2583 8,039 Planning Commission Secretary# 3444 4,019 3484 4,906 3494 5,157 Planning Specialist 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Planning Technician 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Plans Examiner# 3482 4,857 3522 5,930 3532 . 6,233 Principal Librarian' 2495 5,183 2535 6,327 2545 6,651 Principal Management Analyst" 2543 6,585 2583 8,039 2593 8,450 Principal Planner' 2537 6,391 2577 7,802 2587 8,201 Public Services Technician 1 4413 3,445 4453 4,206 4463 4,421 Public Services Technician 11 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Public Services Technician 111 4443 4,001 - 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 4,021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 1 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Public Works Maintenance Manager' 2566 7,385 2606 9,016 2616 9,477 Public Works Safety Coordinator#2 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Purchasing Clerk 4374 2,836 .4414 3,462 4424 3,640 Purchasing Manager` 2530 6,171 2570 7,534 2580. 7,919 Records Clerk 4358 2,619 4398 3,197 4408 3,360 Records Coordinator 4386 3,011 4426 1 3,676 4436 3,864 Redevelopment Analyst I # 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Redevelopment Analyst II # 3487 4,980 3527 6,079 3537 6,390 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Secretary' 4394 3,134 4434 3,826 4444 4,021 Senior Account Clerk 4395 3,149 4435 3,845 4445 4,041 Senior Account Technician 4446 4,062 4486 4,958 4496 5,212 Senior Accountant# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Senior Administrative Secretary' 4444 4,021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 4,374 3501 5,340 3511 5,613 Senior Building Ins ector#2 3484 4,906 3524 5,989 3534 6,295 Senior Buyer# 3463 4,418 3503 1 5,394 3513 1 5,669 Senior Civil Engineer" 2547 6,717 2587 8,201 2597 8,620 Senior Code Enforcement Officer# 3461 . 4,374 3501 5,340 3511 5,613 Senior Electrician # 3485 4,930 3525 6,019 3535 6,327 Senior GIS Analyst# 3484 4,906 3524 5,989 3534 6,295 Senior Information Services Analyst# 3535 6,327 3575 7,724 3585 8,119 Senior Information Services Specialist 4493. 5,135 4533 6,268 4543 6,589 Senior Librarian# 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Senior Park Planner# 3500 5,313 3540 6,487 3550 6,818 General Employees Group July 2009 Senior Planner* 2517 5,784 2557 7,061 2567 7,422 Senior Plans Examiner# 3497 5,235 3537 6,390 3547 6,717 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Special Districts Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Su t*Z 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Supervising Public Works Ins ector#Z 3494 1 5,157 3534 6,295 3544 6,617 Technical Production Coordinator 4460 4,355 4500 5,317 4510 5,589 Theatre Technician III 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Traffic Engineer* 2569 7,496 2609 , 9,152 2619 9,620 Utilities Division General Manager* 2566 7,385 2606 9,016 2616 9,477 Utility Operations Manager* 2524 5,989 2564 7,312 2574 7,686 Veterinarian* 1 2579 7,880 2619 9,620 2629 10,112 Veterinary Assistant 4407 3,344 4447 4,082 4457 4,291 Veterinary Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487_ 4,983 General Employees Group July 2009 P35 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Step Amount Step .: Amount -Step.- Amount Account Clerk '6368 ' 15.87 -.6408 19.37 6418 ' 20.36 Administrative Intern 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Animal Caretaker 6378 - 16.69 6418:" 20:38 6428 '. 21.42 Animal License Canvasser 6266 9.54 . 6306 1 11.65 '6316 12.26 Animal Services Officer 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Assistant Pool Manager 6305 1 11.60 6345 14.16 6355 14.87. Box Office Assistant 6290 10.76 '6330 13.13 '6340 13.81 Box Office Specialist 63111 . 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Business License Clerk 6378 16.69 6418 20.38 6428 • 21.42 Environmental Resources Intern 6280. 10.23 6320 12.48 . 6330 13.13 Instructor/Guard 1 6240 8.38 6280 10.23 6290 10.76 Instructor/Guard II 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 .6330 13.13 Library Aide 6237 8.25 627.7 10.09 6287` 10.59 Librarian 1 6433 21.95 6473 26.79 "6483 28.16 Library Assistant 1 6362 15.41 6402• 1 18.81 - 6412 19.77 Library Assistant II 6404 . 18.99 6444' 23.20 _•6454 24.37 Library Clerk 6346 14.22 6386 17.37 6396 18.25 Library Page 623T 8.25 6277 " 10.09 6287 10.59 Library Page II 6280 10.23 6320 - 12.48 6330 13.13 Maintenance Technician2 . 6280 10.23 6320 , 12.48 6336 ; 13.13 Office Specialist 1 6332 13.25 6372 16.19 6382 ' 17.02 Office-Specialist II 6352 14.65 6392 17.89 6402 18.80 Outreach Technician '6311 11.95 6351 " 14.58 6361 15.33 Planning Aide 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Pool Manager 6329 1 13.07 -,6369 `' 15.95 6379 4-1 16.76 Program Specialist .6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Purchasing Clerk 6368 15.87 6408 19.37 .6418' ` 20.37 Receptionist '6342 13.94 6382 17.02 :6392 17.89 Records Clerk 6344 14.08 6384.• , 17.19 6394 18.08 Records Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Recreation Attendant 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 ` 10.59 Recreation Assistant 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 =6316 ` 12.26 Recreation Leader 6290 10.76 6330. 13.13 6340 13.81 Senior Civil Engineer 6543 37.99 '6583 46.37 6593 48.75 Theatre Technician 1 "' 6314 11.95 6351' 14.58 6361 . ` 15.33 Theatre Technician 11 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Veterinary Assistant 6400 18.62 1 6440 1 22.73 6450, 23.89 Veterinary Technician 6434 22.40 1 -6474 1 27.35 6484 28.74 1. When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of$50 at the option of the employee. 2' Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance. # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class Denotes Management Class General Employees Group July 2009 p36 Resolution No. PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2009 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Electrician 5457 4,287 5497 5,234 5507 5,502 Equipment Operator 5425 3,655 5465 4,462 5475 4,690 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat 5389 3,054 5429 3,729 5439 3,919 Lead Maintenance Worker 5429 3,729 5469 4,552 5479 4,785 Lead Mechanic 5440 1 3,939 5480 4,808 5490 5,054 Maintenance Coordinator 5452 4,182 5492 5,105 5502 5,366 Maintenance Worker 5391 3,085 5431 3,766 5441 3,958 Mechanic 5430 3,747 5470 4,574 5480 4,808 Senior Maintenance Worker 5401 3,243 5441 3,958 5451 4,161 Signal & Lighting Coordinator 5479 4,785 5519 5,841 5529 6,140 Signal & Lighting Technician 5452 4,182 5492 5,105 5502 5,366 Public Works Maint. Employees July 2009 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 15, 2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Board President Donald Kurth, MD and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, District CEO From: Peter Bryan, Fire Chief By: • Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Subject: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve Resolution No. FD 09-XXX adjusting the Fire Inspection Bureau fees and permit categories to allow the Bureau to more accurately assess permit and inspection fees. This proposed resolution will rescind Section 2 (Inspection Fees) and Section 3 (Permit Fees) of Resolution No. FD 06-015 and establish the fees proposed herein as the inspection and permit fees for the Fire District. BACKGROUND In August 2005, the Board approved moving forward with an independent time and motion study intended to establish the permit and inspection fees that would make the Fire Inspection Bureau a cost-recovery program. A well-known consultant, Maximus, completed this study in early 2006. The various inspection and permit fees recommended by Maximus for the high hazard occupancies were accepted by the Fire District and adopted by Resolution No. FD 06-015 in April 2006. In early 2007, the re-organization of the Fire Inspection Bureau began and the high hazard occupancy inspection program was implemented in accordance with the goals and priorities established by the Board in the 2005 Strategic Plan. On-going evaluations of the inspection program and recent changes to the California Fire Code have produced three reasons why it is necessary to make changes to the existing fee schedule: 1) Some of the estimated fees do not correlate precisely with the goal of actual cost recovery, 2) The general permit categories in the California Fire Code do not provide the ability to differentiate between various sized operations with the same hazard, and 3) The 2007 California Fire Code has new permit categories that were not in previous versions of the Code. In addition correcting and addressing these concerns, the proposed resolution also: • Reduces the inspection and permit fees for qualifying non-profit organizations to one-half the standard fee established by the fee schedule. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO PAGI32 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06- J Un F 15,2009 • Codifies the Fire Chief's authority to make administrative changes and adjustments to the fee assessment methodology when those adjustments result in specific fees remaining unchanged or result in a fee reduction. Correlating Fees to Cost Recovery After conducting high hazard occupancy inspections for the past two years, staff has found that several of the consultant's time estimates for both field and office work associated with inspection activities do not correlate to actual applied experience. As a result, some of the approved fees do not align with the program's goal of cost recovery. These and a few other fees were adjusted administratively in order to achieve parity between staff time expended and the fees that are assessed. Fees that were adjusted administratively include: • Apartment inspection fees Underground storage tank removal permit fees • Unscheduled/Requested inspection fees An example of an appropriate administrative fee adjustment is found in changes that have been made to apartment inspection fees. It is recognized that not all apartments are part of large, multi- building complexes. Some apartments are in single buildings. Less time is required to complete the site inspection when there are just one or two buildings compared to the time to inspect the entire site of a multi-building community. To correct for this, the point at which per unit inspection fees are included was increased from five units to nine units. Use of Sub-Categories and Level of Hazard Assessment The structure of the Permits section of the Fire Code also presents a problem with properly correlating time and fees. The Fire Code identifies broad categories of high hazard operations that require a Fire Code permit. The Code, however, does not have a mechanism to differentiate between facilities of different sizes that have the same hazardous operation. Due to this deficiency, the original recommended permit fee for each hazardous operation was based on an average sized facility. This approach also resulted in some of the approved fees not aligning with the cost recovery goal of the inspection program. To address this problem, the District administratively created sub- categories within several of the Fire Code's standard hazardous occupancy classifications. This allowed the District to assess permit and inspection fees that match the time required for the actual inspections. Standard permit categories that have been divided into sub-categories and general hazards that need to be given special consideration include: • Dry cleaning operations • Fireworks displays • The use of candles in churches Dry cleaning operations and the use of candles in churches provide two good examples of how this corrective measure works. The District has sub-categorized the Dry Cleaning permit into Small Shop, Medium Shop, and Large Shop. Each sub-category has its own fee as opposed to a single fee for all Dry Cleaning operations. The individual fees reflect the differing amounts of time required to inspect facilities of different sizes. P39 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO PAGE 3 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO.FD 06- JUNF 15,2009 Similarly, the use of candles in churches is not nearly the hazard that is created by the use of candles in restaurants, clubs, and bars. As a result, the additional compliance inspections completed throughout the year at restaurants, clubs, and bars are not necessary at churches. Compliance with Fire Code requirements for candle use in churches can be verified during the regular inspection and no additional permits or fees are necessary to cover the cost of additional inspection time. Addition of New Permit Categories With the State's use of the International Fire Code as the basis for the 2007 California Fire Code, there are now additional high hazard permit categories that were not in the Uniform Fire Code. These permit categories need fees assigned to them. This proposed resolution adds those permits and a time-based fee to the fee schedule. New permit categories include: • Delayed and Access-Controlled Egress • Hot Work Program • Large Family Day Care • Waste Handling Facility As experience and new technology reveal hazards not addressed in previous versions of the Code, code review and code adoption committees at both the state and national level propose changes and additions to the various codes. These changes are then included in subsequent versions of the codes after they are approved by a vote of the governing boards and representatives of the member agencies. An example of a much needed addition to the list of high hazard facilities is the inclusion of waste handling facilities. As awareness increases with regard to the health and environmental hazards associated with waste materials such as hazardous waste, e-waste, universal waste, and the disposal of synthetic materials, the Fire Code has continued to provide measures designed to protect the well-being of individuals as well as that of the community as a whole. Not only can waste materials cause long-term problems for our natural environment, fires involving waste materials can have acute effects through the toxic smoke that is produced as these materials burn. Preventing waste fires that can burn for several hours or even many days is critical to the region's air quality improvement efforts. For the sake of community safety and quality of life, it is important that facilities that handle waste do so in compliance with the Fire Code. Once in complete compliance with the applicable provisions, the District will issue a permit to conduct waste handling operations. Similarly, as the need increases for good quality day care in a home environment, the codes are allowing home day care facilities to accommodate a larger number of children. A Large Family Day Care is a home-based business that can provide daytime care for up to 14 children in single family dwellings, apartments, and condominiums. The Fire Code has special requirements for homes that provide care for this many children. Among those requirements are a fire alarm system that is capable of sounding throughout the house, special single action hardware on the doors, fire extinguishers, and additional smoke alarms. These provisions are required in order to provide early notification and easier evacuation of a large number of children from a conventional home. It is important that these life safety features are in place and functional. P40 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO PAGE 4 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO.FD 06- JuNE 15,2009 The Fire District recognizes the community and social value of home day care facilities. As such, the fee for Large Family Day Care permits has been set at the lowest level. The annual fee is $136 which is equivalent to 1'/4 hours of total inspection time. Actual experience shows that more time than this is almost always needed since these homes generally require both an initial inspection and a re-inspection every year in order to achieve complete compliance with the code. The Inspection Bureau now has enough actual field experience to know with reasonable certainty how much time is required to complete various inspections. In the cases where the new Fire Code has given us permit categories that we did not previously have, we have used a time comparison approach to setting fees for those permits. In addition to the two-plus years of experience with our inspection program, many of the personnel who make up our Inspection Bureau have years of experience conducting inspections in other jurisdictions. Inspection, Permit, and Fee Process When the Fire Inspection Bureau was authorized, the Board's direction was to implement a cost recovery, fee-for-service program. While some fire departments and fire districts across the country use the Fire Code's requirements for permits as a means of generating revenue, this was not the intent of our program. The Fire Code requires compliance with all applicable code provisions before a permit to conduct hazardous operations is issued. The only effective way to verify complete compliance is through on-site inspections. In keeping with the intent of the Fire Code, District inspectors conduct annual inspections of high hazard occupancies, issue correction notices if applicable, provide the business with an application for a permit, assess the appropriate permit fee, and issue the required permit(s) when all aspects of the operation are in compliance with the Fire Code. Any permit that is issued is preceded by an inspection and verification of compliance. The Inspection Bureau continues to pursue its inspection efforts in accordance with the needs assessment and recommendations in the 2005 Strategic Plan and in accordance with the priorities established in conjunction with the Board's authorization of the program. The Bureau's focus continues to be on Assembly use occupancies; high hazard occupancies that require an operational permit; and State-mandated inspections of multi-family residential occupancies, hotels and motels, schools and child care centers, and hospitals. The overall goal is the reduction of risk in the community and the improved quality of life that comes with risk reduction. High hazard facilities are ranked according to their probability of an emergency incident; the types of known violations that exist; and the potential for loss of life, property damage or destruction, adverse economic impact, and environmental degradation. Concern has been previously expressed that permit fees may not always reflect the specific amount of time that an inspector is on site for an inspection. A fire inspection begins with the inspector reviewing the occupancy file in the office prior to the field inspection. This review allows the inspector to become better informed as to the business and its operations. It also provides the inspector with the opportunity to review any additions to the file since the last inspection. These additions could include new plans or processes approved by the Building & Safety Department and/or Fire Construction Services. In some cases the previous business has moved to another location and a new business is operating at the address that is due for inspection. A review of the occupancy file is an integral part of a successful inspection. P41 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO PAGE 5 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06- JUNe:15,2009 The file review is followed by the actual on-site inspection. Inspectors check a building from top to bottom, go into every room, and observe every process. They make field notes while they are touring a facility with a representative of the business. During approximately 30% of first-time inspections, a correction notice is not left with the business at the conclusion of the on-site visit. This practice occurs when new or altered processes or hazards are found. In these cases, the inspector needs additional office time to research the applicable codes and determine what is required of the business to obtain an operational permit. Upon gathering this information, the inspector uses the field notes and the code references to generate an inspection report that includes items for correction. The permit fees in the resolution include the time necessary for an initial inspection and one follow-up inspection. This fee structure was included as part of the original study and is a standard approach to establishing fees since nearly every facility requires at least one follow-up inspection. The current fee schedule allows the District to assess re-inspection fees when a business does not come into compliance after the first re-inspection. The Inspection Bureau has been very conservative with the use of these re-inspection fees. We realize that many businesses have not been inspected for several years and that some of the required corrections take more time than others to complete. It has been our practice to forego re-inspection fees as long as businesses are actively working to make the necessary corrections. It is not uncommon for inspectors to make several re-inspections without assessing any fees beyond the original annual permit fee. In some cases this approach results in staff time for which the District does not recover its costs. Experience, however, has shown that a good cooperative relationship between the inspector and the business results in more timely compliance than a confrontational approach. Less time spent overall at a facility allows the inspector to move on to other high hazard occupancies that may be in need of a comprehensive inspection and review. ANALYSIS Since the Inspection Bureau focuses on the high hazard facilities in accordance with the goals of the Strategic Plan and priorities of the inspection program, it is common to encounter complex code compliance situations. Many of the businesses inspected by the District require extra time to achieve compliance since they have not been regularly inspected and have changed processes and uses over the years as they respond to the ever-evolving economy. Permit fees are based on a typical facility of a particular type or use. A good number of facilities are at this point atypical and require more than the standard inspection and more than one re-inspection. As subsequent annual inspections are conducted at businesses that were first inspected in 2007 and 2008, a higher level of compliance is being experienced and the amount of time for the annual inspection is coming in line with the typical facility. This is consistent with the findings of other fire departments that have re-initiated inspection programs after a period of not doing inspections. What this means is that in the coming years District inspectors will spend a more typical amount of time at facilities that are now requiring extra time. That freed-up extra time can be used for additional inspections and even more community risk reduction. It is anticipated, based on recent experience, that the inspectors will be able to complete more inspections per year as rates of compliance improve. This presents a win-win opportunity for all. Businesses benefit from fees that are reduced from their original estimates and fire inspectors will be visiting more facilities as long-time compliance issues are resolved. P42 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO PAGE 6 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND 3 OF RESOLUTION NO.ED 06- JUNE 15,2009 A comprehensive review of the impact of the reduced fees has been completed. During FY 07-08, the only time period so far for which complete data are available, the Bureau issued 704 permits. Of those, 49 permits will have the reduced fees that are included in this proposed resolution. Additionally, 160 facilities that do not require a permit (apartments, private schools, etc.) will see reduced inspection fees. The total dollar amount of the reductions is approximately $19,000 or 4.4% of the revenue generated in FY 07-08. This reduction will not have a significant impact on the Inspection Bureau, but, based on the feedback that we have received, will have a noticeable positive impact on those businesses whose fees are reduced. The attached spreadsheet details the fee reductions, administrative adjustments, and new permit categories that are incorporated into this proposed resolution. It also includes a revenue analysis. During the development of the inspection program and the establishment of the fees, District personnel worked with our Chamber of Commerce over the course of three years. We have continued to meet regularly to discuss items of mutual interest. These meetings, along with input from the community and our internal reviews of the inspection program, have resulted in bringing this proposed resolution to the Board complete with fee adjustments, recommended sub-categories for the Fire Code's operational permits, and updates to provide consistency with the State's new Fire Code. There are an estimated 1,200 to 1,300 businesses that require at least one Fire Code permit. From January 2007 through the end of March 2008, the Bureau was able to inspect just under 600 of those businesses in addition to the 78 schools and 140 apartment buildings and communities that are inspected annually. The Bureau continues to add new inspections to our schedule as increased compliance at previously inspected facilities provides additional time for more inspections. We still have an estimated 600 facilities that have not yet been inspected that require a Fire Code permit. Respectfully submitted, piv&r-) Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief P43 RESOLUTION NO. FD Oq OZ� A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR INSPECTION FEES AND PERMIT FEES, AND RESCINDING SECTION 2 AND SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015. A. RECITALS (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge as hereinafter set forth, the local agency shall hold a noticed public hearing to consider the matter. (ii) On the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed fees and service charges, as required by law. (iii) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Section 2 and Section 3 of Resolution No. FD 06-015 are hereby rescinded. 3. The Inspection and Permit Fees for Non-Profit organizations shall be one- half the amount of the fees herein approved. 4. The Chief is authorized to administratively make fee reduction adjustments, to administratively add permit sub-categories, and to administratively modify and/or determine fee assessment methodologies when such adjustments, additions, modifications, or determinations are necessary to ensure conformance with the cost recovery intent of the Inspection and Permit Fees approved herein. Administrative adjustments shall not result in fees that are higher than those approved herein. S. The Board of Directors has determined that none of the fees established herein exceeds the reasonable estimated cost of providing the service to which each such fee applies. 6. The following fee schedule is hereby approved and adopted: P44 Resolution No. FD Page 2 of 7 SECTION 1: INSPECTION FEES Field Inspection after Initial Re-inspection $110 Requested Inspection (per hour-one hour minimum) $110 Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation $550 Apartment Building/Complex Annual Inspection Buildings with 3 or 4 units $188 Buildings with 5 to 7 units $240 Buildings with 8 units $330 Each additional dwelling unit beginning with the ninth unit (per unit) $11 Condominium Complex Annual Inspection $330 Hotel/Motel Annual Inspection First 10 rooms $330 Each additional room (per room) $11 Licensed Care Facility Pre-inspection - 25 or fewer residents $50 Pre-inspection - more than 25 residents $100 Annual Inspection Home Care Facility(More than six clients) $240 Commercial facility- First 10 rooms $330 Commercial facility- Each additional room (per room) $11 High Rise Building (per hour) $110 Large Family Daycare Annual Inspection $136 Adult/ Child Care Facility(Group 1-4 Occupancies)Annual Inspection $330 Private School /Large Child Care Facility(Group E Occupancies)Annual Inspection Small School $240 Large School $330 Medical Facility Annual Inspection Hospital / Nursing Home (Group 1-2 Occupancies) $660 Clinic $240 Ambulatory Care Facility(Group 1-2.1 Occupancy) $330 Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour-one hour minimum) $110 SECTION 2: PERMIT FEES A. Fire Code Activity Permits (Single Event— One Time) Amusement Buildings $385 Carnivals, Fairs, and Outdoor Public Assemblages $240 Commercial Cooking Operation at Carnival Fair, Outdoor Event $136 Exhibits and Tradeshows $240 Explosives/blasting agents single day use $240 Fireworks; public display or special effects Small Display/ Limited effects 1-4 minutes $240 Medium Display/ Moderate effects 5-8 minutes $550 Large Display/ Extensive effects 9 or more minutes $743 - Resolution No. FD P45 Page 3 of 7 Hazardous Materials Tank- Remove or Abandon in Place $1,128 Hot work single day operation $240 LP-gas install stationary container $188 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles in assembly area single event $188 Live Audience $240 Open burning single day use $136 Open Flames and Torches for paint removal $136 Open Flames and Torches in a hazardous fire area $136 Open Flames and Candles in assembly area-single day permit $136 Parade- inspection of floats $136 Public Assemblage- Indoor $240 Pyrotechnical special effects- See Fireworks Seasonal Sales Lot $136 Tent, Canopy, or Temporary Membrane Structure per inspection $240 B. Annually Renewable Permits Access Control Commercial $188 Residential (Requires monthly testing) $550 Aerosol Products $550 Amusement Buildings $385 Aviation Facility Servicing or Repair $550 Fuel Servicing Vehicles $240 Battery Charging Operation $240 Cellulose Nitrate Film $454 Combustible Dust Producing Operations 5,000 square feet or less $330 5,001 to 15,000 square feet $550 More than 15,000 square feet $743 Combustible Fibers $330 Commercial Cooking Operation $240 Compressed Gases Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Highly Toxic-any amount $330 Inert and Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cubic feet $330 Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Medical Use Gas - Less than Table 105.6.8 Amounts Portable Cylinders $188 _Piped System $240 Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet $330 Oxidizing including oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet $330 Pyrophoric- any amount $330 Radioactive- any amount $330 Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Toxic- any amount $330 Unstable Reactive- any amount $330 Covered Mall Building $658 Resolution No. FD P46 Page 4 of 7 Cryogenic Fluids $330 Cutting and Welding $330 Deep Sedation /General Anesthesia $240 _Delayed and Access-Controlled Egress $188 Dipping Operations $330 Dry Cleaning Plant Small - 1 or 2 machines $240 Medium - 3 or 4 machines $440 Large- 5 or more machines $743 Emergency Helicopter Landing Facility $550 Explosives Process, manufacture, store, or sell $345 Use $240 Fire Alarm Central/Remote Station $10/acct Fire Hydrants and Valves $188 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Class I Liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. outside of a building $188 Class 11 or Class IIIA 25 gal. in a building; 60 gal. outside of a building $188 250 gallons or less over maximum allowable quantity $550 251-500 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $578 501-1,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $605 1,001-5,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $633 5,001-10,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $660 More than 10,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $688 Remove Class I or Class II from a UST $936 Operate Tank Vehicles, etc $330 Place a tank out of service $936 Change Contents $550 Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine Flammable/Combustible Liquids $1,128 Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't, Manufacturing Establishments $330 Dispense-Tank Vehicle to Fuel Tank $330 Use or Operate a Pipeline within a Facility $743 Floor Finishing in excess of 350 square feet using Class I or Class II liquids Commercial/ Industrial $240 Residential $136 Fruit and Crop Ripening $550 Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in Table 105.6.20 Gallons -250 or fewer $550 Gallons -251-500 $578 Gallons - 501-1,000 $605 Gallons - 1,001-5,000 $633 Gallons - 5,001-10,000 $660 Gallons - More than 10,000 $688 Pounds - 1,000 or fewer $550 Pounds - 1,001-5,000 $578 Pounds - 5,001-10,000 $605 Pounds - 10,001-25,000 $633 Pounds -25,001-50,000 $660 Pounds More than 50,000 $688 Cubic feet- 500 or fewer $550 Cubic feet- 501-2,000 $578 P47 Resolution No. FD Page 5 of 7 Cubic feet- 2,001-5,000 $605 Cubic feet- 5,001-10,000 $633 Cubic feet- 10,001-25,000 $660 Cubic feet- More than 25,000 $688 HPM Facilities $440 High Piled Storage in excess of 500 square feet 500-12,000 square feet $550 12,001-20,000 square feet $578 20,001-100,000 square feet $605 100,001-500,000 square feet $633 More than 500,000 square feet $660 Hot Work Hot Work Fixed Site $330 Hot Work Operations $240 Hot Work Program $188 Industrial Ovens $330 Large Family Daycare $136 Liquid- or Gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings $188 LP-Gas Store, use, handle, dispense, sell $330 Cylinder Exchange only $136 Live Audience $240 Lumber Yard and Woodworking Plant $440 Magnesium $330 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage $240 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility $330 Open Flames Open Flames and Torches for paint removal $136 Open Flames and Torches in a hazardous fire area $136 Open Flames and Candles in assembly area/restaurant $136 Organic Coatings $330 Pallet Storage $330 Place of Assembly A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums, and similar $440 A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns, Bars $385 A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement $385 A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar with fixed seats $440 A-5 Outdoor assembly areas and uses $660 Powder Coating $330 Private Fire Hydrant $188 Production Facility $385 Pyrotechnic Special Effects Material (See Fireworks Single Event Permit) Pyroxylin Plastics . $440 Recycling and Scrap Metal Facilities $550 Refrigeration Equipment $330 Reinforced Plastics/ Resin Application $330 Repair Garage/ Industrial Facility (Includes all required permits;if actual fees are lower,actual fees will be assessed) _5,000 square feet or less $330 5,001 - 15,000 square feet $550 15,001 to 50,000 square feet $743 P48 Resolution No. FD Page 6 of 7 More than 50,000 square feet-Actual permit fees Rooftop Heliport $550 Spraying Operations $330 Stationary Storage Battery System $330 Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts $240 Tire Rebuilding Plants $1,128 Waste Handling Facility $550 Wood Products $440 Wrecking Yard $550 7. The Secretary to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection.District shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following Page for formal adoption,certification and signatures P49 Resolution No. FD Page 7 of 7 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Dr. Donald J. Kerth, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P50 roa C N r a Q) C f./ O N o > 7 Z fl LL K 4) O Vl C N V O M N of w w _ co wa O E N O` O � � a y r 3 O LL G c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O co V N O O 00 00 O O (O LO O It (O V N (O N LL e u w, 3 W d LL w O a) O C) co V 0 C) 0 0 O N O N O O O C C (O M (o h M M (0 0 (o C C V (O O (O M M M H3 M M H3 EA (O O O V (O O d ll K3 Z fA fA fA fA EH EA fA 69 Z fA Z < fA fA < EH 7 (A U 000 0000 0 0 00 O 0 , O (o0 00 0000 (fJ co V M M M N O V M .-- .- M M V M (O V M N (O N M M M M Efl Efl N M fA M N M (O N CO O d V3 (A fA Efl EA EA fA fA EA EA EA EA 69 EA EA (A fA EA (fl (A ^� LL Y Q a C So w� U W N a C V m C C O 7 C C CD O C W _n o ¢ u E a) N C O a N E = a m a E C > m E U o O^ o t � o Q O c n m m a) a a O C_ C 3 % E a U > > (Uj L. E U C 0 C C 0 a C.J 0 O a CUa� ma C OO L U N— N . C O U .p C� U 0 — La N O wa O C j L a O N N LL w a V LL N O O CO L m ° ° Q .w ° m m aa) o 0 c ° c o- w 'uo � m U o °) a m L o c ° d m m m > > (7 -o w E a o u c O LL C O C a a E Q C 3 X a O N E C N m m L Q _ U N O C x LL (0 O 'O N O co O O C 0 M N M a C N _ c c 0 U N N a N N O w Co C � L.. C C U O o N N E E +�+♦ a ° a°i a)aa) c 3 3 3 ° O n o '° m '� '� a E E E c o o o Q Z U o V N C a LL N N W -O U C O -O LL N N C O O O m m L L O m o N w -° c -° a� a s-_ x U U = U U o (' ° '-' - c U C O m C C C m = Q O m m C C m O O (A f0 :U m m ° N y m > > > CO E O m a� d C C M LL U U) E (� - o - E c 47L Emmmw o � iiw yLLLL ¢ m � � m2UQ m _ 7 U IfCL Vl N N c O_ 0 0 0 L 7 > -O 0)C LL � Z Q U S J x J ¢ d Q P51 C N N N N - 7 0 d d d C o j 7 Z Z Z LLa a 41 U) M C co w O W 0 # y d LL O 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 0 - O O O LO M 0 0 0 0 O 00 O i=r (O OD u7 V o � V d d O d d (O M d d d co O N co d co d d (D co d OD d 0 C c C c c V O) c c c N V co N c Cl) C c M (h C 00 c R O N O O Cl) N O O O N O O O O O N y Z (» Z Z (A1- Z Z Z '(H 69 (14Z (4Z Z 49 (A Z 64 Z (H LL to w U .O (O O (D O O O O m N 0 00 co 0 (O (O O (O (O 0 d o o - d OD V Cl) V V V (O V N 'Ir w w V m m M m m V c M V a) Cl) N N N N (O r N N N O N O d (» (» (» (» f9 (» f9 (» (» (» (» (» (A w w w w w 2 to f9 O CL a 0 w m a a d c o d y y O U > 0 C 'a N c_ N a) O > > E d a) a y O N c d C a) C d CO LL C N E 'C a7 a) ' U E - E Lo o a) d j N � V Q) co N 0 7 N O (O w . a°i ° a E O 3 d as m � ° ° E 2 -0 a 0 c d d E U U d U d > d n1 LL d N (6 d d 0 N c d d .0 . � c N d E a c C d d > d c c O. cc co (n d 00 '� N (� N o C O od °U a0s u u 0 0 o m a) clvd X L ° 'O O O o J W m m U o wO a a m , F c � a) aoc � LN N ° > o o E C c c N (6 O a) U c 'O O O F- E -0 0 0 "O in U_ V) N_ ` � md c C C C co d J O N m (6 (0 d N y a7 a1 a] N y 0 O COLoo '� co) � a E — d n ° u a d - LL V Cl cc d01 C fa C d d d (q U (n O O d N U m d w E d (0 J N N d ` E E E C N 'c c c E E = 00 a 0 3 p ; ° ° ¢ c c c c o a) N d E — O. d N 3 d d d d d co 2 (a C wQUUwwli mma o000aaaini N d d — d LL c N E d IL P52 O d C co co n co C6 J v rn 0) 0 O) C O > 7 tf9 EA (A EA d U. w � N N V Q) V M N � r. _C to 0 y U. a r 00 0000 0000 00000 0000000000 0 O 0 0 0 (O O (D (D 0 0 00 0 (0 0 (0 0 (O ID (0 co O O) O o LO N Ll') N V V V LO N C LO V LO N 7 LO tf) V o u L N O O 00 N 0 0 0 7 M N N N O N O O M M O N LO c LO LO c (O LO M LO V C c C LO c LO LO V V LO c c V LO V V lO V V N V M C C M O LO N O LO LO M V I- 0 0 0 0 LO (O r n LO O O LO (D (D M O o M (A Z (A (A Z w ( u) w 09 Z Z Z EA Z EA EA (A EA (A Z Z (A to (A EA fA ffl Efl EA 69 V3 Z Z H3 LL U .O c0 0 0 LO o 0 o V O O M O O O O O O O OJ O O O O O O O O W O O O W O co LD 0 co LO V V UA M Ln O co V co co co co co co V co M M M M M co LO co co V co co N — LO LO co Ln N N M LO I� M N M M co M M N M CO M M M M CO (D M M N M 0 w N3 LA (H to EA EH EH EA fA EA fA fA 69 fA b9 fA fA M E/3 (A EA M ff3 H3 EA fA N3 EA EA EA H3 fA fA 0. L O a` a) � C U JO U o E w o D WLO U p C LO J m o U c N L O m C N V D m — Q) U N N (0 O w c0 J N L m L c N O O a m a n c m 0 0 o E w O O_ w O O N C .� U w m pcj C o m r E w O w N (U O N c J x O N N Q) C J N �` -O N J - C m ° L O w J O C C a N U C m Q m m r E CL N J C E .° o ° E m m C O _ J — E ` L O .0 p w N y m Q C d m J O.a) (0 m w 0 d m c a� m u '// m C m C J > f`p O d w ° a) o 0 0 O co m m a O °� Ln 2 _� c m m .0 m U c cm c o E a o c w d u E v m ° Y ° m a m am ac w O Z O LL a o 0 o in o �_ m o > c w ° O o ° O N 7 m = C N .c O L.. LL (J zn m ~ ` m a a = c 0 m N m m � p C Q m c E p � :� v o o o m a 0 E m c u N a o .N u m m J ° a O E w o c m Z ° L Z O O m a) E L r m L "O O 'O C X w LL 'O m c a o 0 d m LL W J 0 0 0 . w p m m .c o x m ro o c c o m p O UQ — E cu) � O w Lri L62 w � U LL = c � � OOd � (A H 7) 'c m m � E N y N .o ° E a a a c n a c N (ui `m E > m N CL 0 0 0 0 o 0 D 0)) N .d — < < < < co UU UUU V 00000 m J a P53 C N N N C o > 7 Z Z Z LL (n (n U) M N C D E O # m c LL LL C 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OD O V OJ C) O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O V 00 V CO coo (O (D 0 j U N M N a) N O) co U V m N 0 a0 LO M O cO (O O (O O m N N co N N O D) O N N Ln V c C C C N V O LO C C LO I� O M (D CO M LO M LO C) C C ITC C LO M M M N N N 41 W r 0 0 0 0 M O O LO LO 0 (O (O (D m 0 0 LO w 0 0 O O Ln OD C) O N M y (A Z Z Z Z 1- (A EA Z Z 69 to EA b9 EA EA fA EA (H N3 Z Z (f3 Z Z (a fA EA LL M E�9 u9 U3 V3 U � O O M O LO O 00 co co O 00 LO M O co (D O (D O co O O M O (D O O co LO M O co V V V LO V V U N co 00 O M O m M M M LO N M M R V M n O M O CO N N V I� N M N m iO LO (O (O (O (D C) CO CO) LO M CO 0 LO LO (D (D (D (D n LL » 0 W W N J E N W O T m W O O 'o T m W m O w J E v C) ri maT = C CJ O c o O r (D C) r @ J D U J — O1 J CS m o Co P c ? Q m 3 a m m t- c W a @ - E c c c 3 a m a � � ti o m 3 - m E 0 @ -� m - cg �0 0 M E 5 "R c o m LL W W E m J t9 @ V H m c o (° m E J E .x E E � d .c W o E -E m � � .X J E x m > Q .o � ti . E W m o o o m x m E 0 = d m J a O W o a) c LL W - Q y E m E > c W W O m 'D W c_ o O o C U ry C N N W U N > E j O y@ N N vi N N O O O L@ E J a x Q o a� o W c (0 U W a� E m a `o 3 0 0 o c E m m o W .N ° = m o W c o 0 o L o W o E > J o 0 0 o m m J N J .S W m W C m Cl 0) O O s m W O O LO E O J � > -0 W W — c 0 m O W > J C - U C W m c C S O LO o C m m s O N m U 0 0 N O E n m > EO (� O O m 0 C) _m c s C U) m H x C LOO LO O O O O m O M o 0U E (� "O U _Q C@ 0 0 0 C U m c V j C i O. C .m O. . N N LO N d E a) m c m -o J ° o 0o Lri O s m m m m W w O � o c W W W W W W — M N = 4) W W m W W m LO �- •• >O C C C E@ o m c c c c c c c m � T W o W U c m W W o 0 �' E N c0i m e o. a o L E W ) � o 0 0 0 0 0 E E W m C@ W E M z m M tO O O O O N Cl m s m .W !O N N O U) U j m m m m m m �+ m U) J W > d Z " 'o m U U N N LO LO R- O d V O E U Q D o (U (D (D (D (D (D Co d ww LL LL LL Li = m c c Q P54 C a C n m y u o > > znLL d (0 m a c O E ( o `y LL o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o IT co V (DM V M V (OW o 00000 0 O O 00) 00 0 (00 U co M V ItV -ItM M -IT -ItV V N 1� 0 v0 m It 0 (o N W C M M M N N N M M M N N N V r` O M (O M M c M c co Cl) M C V M c M C C to M co o) O M M M 0 zT (n N (o (o (o M M O M O .- M M O V M O M 0 0 (O M 4) dEA Uj EA fA EA Efl EA EA EA fA Z b9 Z EA fA fH Z EA fA Z EA Z Z EA 69 D 7 LL (fl w w (A EA (A w fA U 9 O co (n M O co 0 m) )n M O co 0 O co cf) M O O O W O (o W O (o O O 0 0 0 (o (O (O 0 N N r O M (D M M r O M (o m -It Lo n O co (o M 'cT co M co N M M V V M V M M M M M N (O ([] (o (o (o (o (O M o O a7 (o V M (U (o (o (o M N M M N V M N M CO O a) fA 69 fA 69 fA fA V3 to EA EA (A fA EA fA fA fA fA EA H3 fA EA EA EA V3 to EA EA to fA EA w EA fA EA EA C O LL a` C C N J m N E ° m f0 > Q) n o 0 m E o 0 c N E ° c (D c E — t o n a) n 0 m ' y c m m O O N O' a) m Q) O c c O C O a) w a) O y 0. 0 cn 0 0 (n (n a) a� c f6 000 a) o 0 o N 0 w o ° a 0 0 03 O O O N c 3 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 o N m 0 N m O Q 0 a) N C Y = O O m 0 0 N O C O N 7 L.. U a) j CT O ° E L a) a) 0 - m F F U `0 L6 .- _ Co O N D a) X m O' ti O O (n '- m N 'D - LL 'o 'o 0 O o E 0 O O CD 0 o o (D N O C) o 'O m - > 0 m m co O O O O O N � N M 2 C C7'O O O O a) a) o -o m L ° 10 C m W N o0_ 06L 0C) 0oo x n m a) L 0 E o c E E E N N Z' ) N a) N a) a) m 00 0 0 (O N �. O Y w (V U O _m _m m O) O N o L oo >O o C O N J a) a) m y a LL LL LL C 'O 'O U U U U U U N � 0 0 0 a, > > > _ m aj C C C C C C ._ ._ ._ ._ ._ ._ ,F, C 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > � o N o o ° 0 0 0 _ E o a } a E n n n U .. LLLLaLLLLd000UUU m ,� (o � N � � o22S m m o N (nU 'D N m � E000 U E L j a) :O (7 E C y O C cn o a Q LL > > m ._ o a = 2 = C J J J J J 2 2 20 0 m 7 C C Q P55 C (o M M A C U O O O o > > Z Z Z LLCD V) U) V) N C � a) y U. a c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O 00 cc Ln U e � 7 d Y O 0 (0 N 00 O v a) c0 a) a) O a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 a) () a) 0 0 C M V w co V c0 M (O C co c C M c c c c a) c M co C C C -IT L0 co V M CO V CO CO V O O O Cl) O 0 0 0 O M M O O O V (O y EA fA EA fA b') E Z � Z Z � Z Z Z Z ; Z W W Z Z Z N Vd m � U 'a O O o o 0 0 0 a D o 00000 O O M t n O 000 a 0 0 0 0 N M V W w V (O M w W C 7 0 M M M 0 V 0 0 M M R N (O V 0 (AM V M M V (O M M O V LO M M M 10 � l0 M M C, Uj V LO G0 M EA w EH N 69 69 EA EH Z EA V-1 fA EA EA fA EA ; EA fA EA fA fA FA EA O U.2 IL a d C N C N N - rn W 3 > Q) w y 'y M C y _C 76 7 N ~ a) U) U C N Eco X V r C a) w Y m ] 0 o a E 3 w a N Q m _ C 'o 0Ea d Q (U (n C Q .O (U N (a O N-70 U vi O U C co N 0 O y -Op - U o m a) a 0 a) N U a mQQ y`m coa) Z .c a) a coE U C o E a 7 o v C CD M 0y 0= 3o 0 N� a) a r N Oa sNm o E N O N Co (9 w ( C N co O M — U w `U O a (O Ocm LL= c U ODcn U OO m aJ i m � c Om c cd 0 o a) a `-( v o c 19 0 0 'oN Y � QMV O CCo2 0 m oQ c p (D ` Ii L62O CM ac d0 = d c o m -o o o - C (a m ° 0 0 () a7 = U 3 > U 1 ._ O a) d add dddd 0_ � W X00' IV)iO in m c c Q P56 c O 0 N c y A d U 0 (Dj O p d d W d ' N LL (D 3 d a N c y w a) Dd E d d N 3 ~ o y LL N cu d o_ < 'E o _ = U N d C U d d N l`0 C Oo QO a > ; 7 M m E a C N V C O 'O N > N a — 7 U d d m U 0i d d E C aD r C Y U 3 'O N d p d co O. d w d m m N 7 c d LL C Cl) > ID Q)d n C m C m C qq m C O :E L d d o m w E c d 3 a E m O d F L U O O V u U d c y U '0 (DC y V N O L d m c a LL d N d d T - d N 'y r m O m L C '� O N C v �+ O O C m N d o d u d 4 3 D 0 c c d adi N y w d C - � ` d o co O d L O u > > > U 7 O fa O` y 'R a) U 3 U �• '� M aci m n a "v O y y O O a) d N a)u d « C Y N U C 3 • r y U an d m � � O w w N (a L O C .O O N 3 d .d-. a N CD (DC a) m LL y 0 d m 75 N a) N y y N O U O N 16 y L m 3 0 m m E m d 3 >' r_ N y �d -E d 0 C a m d `m y Ewo �. .E O .N E o m - O Q � N n o d y m E m s E ° O 'C (D d u m LL d y L O n m m LL . d (a d Y N d Y E fa C w O .+ d c O w d d n > 'O n -0N C 'm 'm >, > a '3 d m d b U u 0 y N NO O a c m m c y r >� d a n 'c_ 0 00 L a o m E " E E p NC O ._ N fn U N m E N 'y y Y O N U m n amo c c _ E 'DG d m o E w mao CDv mm,dZ' c CD o c 0 o m 0) m Q)C o V 6 is d O a) F CDC O C a y U (D0 u c 3 D N a U y 0 r E o. o d o m 'O m O` d o d . L > N c E 0 d n m n w N L m E p a m c o d d d H p a d O � c < 2 m F F '0 Q? y m > 3 d d y m N C 1 O. Z 'y N M d d d d d d y N N O O O d L N . < • z z z a 3 P57 STAFF REPORT _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,146,750 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 15, 2009 RECOMMENDATION Approval to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund Preliminary Budget in the amount of $22,'146,750 for Fiscal Year 2009/10 and set approval of final budget for the July 15, 2009 Board Meeting. BACKGROUND The Fire District's General Fund Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2009/10 is herein recommended for adoption by the Board of Directors. A budget workshop was held on June 4, 2009, which included specific discussion regarding the preliminary budget. The General Fund budget has seen a reduction from FY 2008/09 with the exception of use of capital reserve funds for the ongoing purchase and construction of Fire Station 177. Revenues are sufficient to support District operations without the infusion of City General Fund revenues. In response to fixed cost increases and the State's ongoing budget crisis, the proposed budget incorporates belt tightening reductions that inClude a reduction in travel and meeting expenses and other reduced expenditures, where possible, yet protecting the District's essential services. Please refer to the City Manager's Budget Message for specific details regarding the Fire District's General Fund. The advertised public hearing for adoption of the Fire District General Fund Final Budget is set for July 15, 2009. Re ectfully submitted, eter M. Bry Fire Chief P58 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A F IQ E P R O T E C T I O N D I S T P I C T Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 GENERAL FUND'S ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolution adopting the General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2009/10. BACKGROUND The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the Board of Directors. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the citys population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.62% and a population change of 1.16%), the District's fiscal year 2009/10 General Fund's appropriations limit is $20,258,396. The District's fiscal year 2009/10 General Fund appropriations subject to this limit total $11,231,280. It is anticipated that the District will be at 55.4% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Tamara L. Layne Finance Director Attachments i:Ifinanceftdget20101City Council staff reporWFire District-Appropriations Limit 2009-10.doc P59 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- GZ r7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for the prior year be adjusted for change in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article XIII-B. These exclusions are: Debt Service Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies, Enterprise Funds, Capital Improvement Carry-Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra-Governmental Service Funds, Reserves for Workers Compensation, Long-Term Disability, Retirement, Unemployment and other reserve funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the aforementioned sections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to be in the best interest of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009/10; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that said General Fund's appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009/10 be established in the amount of$20,258,396. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009/10 pursuant to Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $20,258,396 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President P60 Resolution FD 09- Page 2 ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk i:Iflnancelbudget20l01City Council staff reportslresolution-FD General Fund Appropriations Limit 2009-10.doe P61 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 C,'UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,843,540 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Approval of a resolution adopting the Mello-Roos CFD No. 85-1 annual budget for Fiscal Year 2009/10 in the amount of$5,843,540. BACKGROUND Since Fiscal Year 1986/87, the Board has annually adopted a CFD budget to provide for operations and maintenance costs attributable to providing fire protection services within CFD No. 85-1. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2009/10 provides funding for a portion of the personnel and operational costs necessary to maintain existing fire and life safety service levels within CFD boundaries. The remaining operational and maintenance costs within the CFD are provided through the Fire District's General Fund budget. The proposed budget reflects the Board's continuing commitment of utilizing all other available revenues (General Fund and RDA Fire Fund) in order to annually maintain the lowest possible CFD budget and associated special tax. On June 3, 2009, the Board held an advertised public hearing and approved the Ordinance which establishes the special tax levy for Fiscal Year 2009/10 necessary to meet budget objectives of maintaining existing service levels. There were no public comments regarding the special tax levy during the advertised public hearing. ANALYSIS On June 4, 2009, the City Council/Fire District Board of Directors conducted a comprehensive public budget workshop to review, comment and receive public testimony regarding all City, Fire P62 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET IN PAGE 2 THE AMOUNT OF$5,843,540 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/10 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.85-1 JUNE 15,2009 District and RDA budgets. As part of the workshop, the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 budget was discussed and is now presented for your consideration of final adoption. Respectfully su mitted, Peter M. Brya Fire Chief Attachment P63 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- 02 g A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District') of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District'), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds(2/3)of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and reviewed a budget for fiscal year 2009/10 for the Community Facilities District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2009/10 a copy of said budget being on file in the office of the Community Facilities District and available for public inspection. Section 2. Filing of Budget. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the budget to the Office of the Auditor-Controller for the County of San Bernardino. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2009 P64 Resolution No. FD 08- Page 2 of 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,approved,and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P65 STAFF REPORT r. RANC[-IO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECITON DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RECOMMENDATION Approval of a resolution establishing the maximum tax which could be levied in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CDF) No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BACKGROUND The Mello-Roos CFD No. 85-1 provides voter approved authorization for the District to annually adjust the maximum special tax which could be levied within CFD No. 85-1. This authorization stipulates that the board shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of; (1) changes in cost of living or (2) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code. Each year the Board adjusts, by resolution, the maximum tax which could be levied to provide for inflationary costs associated with providing fire protection services to the CFD. This year's calculation again utilizes changes in cost of living to adjust the maximum special tax. The cost of living adjustment utilized is -1.0% based upon the March Los Angeles area Consumer Price Index. The -1.0% was applied to Fiscal Year 2008/2009's maximum authorized tax in order to calculate the maximum special tax which could be levied in CFD No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. The maximum special tax which could be levied during each year since formation of the CFD is provided in the following table. Exhibit A to the attached resolution sets forth the maximum special tax rate the Board is authorized to levy in Fiscal Year 2009/10. P66 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM TAX PAGE 2 WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN COMMUNITIES DISTRICT FACLITY NO.85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 JUKE 15,2009 Fiscal Year Residential Commercial Industrial 86/87 $ 75.00 per DU $ 75.00 per acre + .04 SF $ 75.00 per acre + .05 SF 87/88 $ 77.28 per DU $ 77.28 per acre + .0412 SF $ 77.28 per acre + .0515 SF 88/89 $ 80.32 per DU $ 80.32 per acre + .0428 SF $ 80.32 per acre + .0535 SF 89/90 $ 84.32 per DU $ 84.32 per acre + .0449 SF $ 84.32 per acre + .0562 SF 90/91 $ 87.87 per DU $ 87.87 per acre + .0468 SF $ 87.87 per acre + .0586 SF 91/92 $ 91.51 per DU $ 91.51 per acre + .0487 SF $ 91.51 per acre + .0610 SF 92/93 $ 95.35 per DU $ 95.35 per acre + .051 SF $ 95.35 per acre + .064 SF 93/94 $ 98.69 per DU $ 98.69 per acre + .053 SF $ 98.69 per acre + .066 SF 94/95 $100.66 per DU $100.66 per acre + .054 SF $100.66 per acre + .067 SF 95/96 $102.17 per DU $102.17 per acre + .055 SF $102.17 per acre + .068 SF 96/97 $103.91 per DU $103.91 per acre + .056 SF $103.91 per acre + .069 SF 97/98 $105.57 per DU $105.57 per acre + .057 SF $105.57 per acre + .070 SF 98/99 $106.84 per DU $106.84 per acre + .058 SF $106.84 per acre + .071 SF 99/00 $109.19 per DU $109.19 per acre + .059 SF $109.19 per acre + .073 SF 00/01 $112.90 per DU $112.90 per acre + .061 SF $112.90 per acre + .076 SF 01/02 $116.50 per DU $116.50 per acre + .063 SF $116.50 per acre + .078 SF 02/03 $119.76 per DU $119.76 per acre + .065 SF $119.76 per acre + .080 SF 03/04 $124.43 per DU $124.43 per acre + .068 SF $124.43 per acre + .083 SF 04/05 $126.79 per DU $126.79 per acre + .069 SF $126.79 per acre.+ .085 SF 05/06 $131.86 per DU $131.86 per acre + .072 SF $131.86 per acre + .088 SF 06/07 $138.06 per DU $138.06 per acre + .075 SF $138.06 per acre + .092 SF 07/08 $143.31 per DU $143.31 per acre + .078 SF 1$143.31 per acre + .095 SF 08/09 $148.04 per DU $148.04 per acre + .080 SF $148.04 per acre + .098 SF 09/10 $146.56 per DU $146.56 per acre + .079 SF $146.56 per acre + .097 SF DU = Dwelling Unit SF = Square Feet R ully submitted, rya f Attachment P67 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- c02 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009110 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District') of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District'), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors desires to establish the maximum special tax which could be levied in the fiscal year 2009/10. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Establishing Maximum Special Tax. This Board of Directors hereby determines that the maximum special tax which could be levied in the Community Facilities District for fiscal year 2009/10 is set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the Community Facilities District in the immediately preceding fiscal year. P68 Resolution No. FD 08- Page 2 of 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P69 EXHIBIT "A" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONSUMER MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX PRICE INDEX 2008/2009 BASE FOR 2009/10 -1.0% $148.04 DU $146.56 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL STRUCTURES SPECIAL TAX Residential ($146.56) per DU Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($146.56) 3 DU: 2.25 ($146.56) 4 DU: 2.65 ($146.56) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($146.56)+{.35(TU - 4)($146.56)) 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($146.56)+{.30 (TU- 14)($146.56)) 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($146.56)+{.25(TU-30)($146.56)) 81-up DU: 23.15 ($146.56)+{.20(TU-80)($146.56)) Commercial ($146.56) per acre + .079per SF Industrial ($146.56) per acre + .097 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LUerical\Word Processing Uocs\Resolutions and Ordinances\Budget\85-1 09-10 Res Max?axlsvy.doc P70 R A N C H O C 0 C A M O N G A - . r,. .. .. . .. . ... . . FIRE PROTF. CTI ON DISTRICT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolution adopting the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2009/10 for CFD No. 85-1. BACKGROUND When the District's CFD No. 85-1 was approved by the voters in 1985, an appropriations limit was established at $1,775,000. This limit was established at 1985 costs for operations and maintenance. In order to annually adjust the maximum spending authority (appropriations limit) to meet increased costs for operations and maintenance, the voters authorized the District to annually adjust the limit. This adjustment is based upon the same methodology used in calculating public agency Prop. 4 spending limits under Article XIIIB of the State of California Constitution. The factors used to develop the appropriations limit are the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.62% and a population change of 1.16%), the District's CFD No. 85-1 fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations limit is $10,566,737. The District's CFD No. 85-1 fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations subject to this limit total $5,814,050. It is anticipated that the District will be at 55.0% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2010. Respectfully submitted, /��(/YYlaf/�A�`i��JV�'E✓ Tamara L. Layne v Finance Director Attachment i:If1nancelbudget201 MCity Council staff reporWFD-Appropriations Limit CFD 85-1 2009-10.doc P71 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- 03c A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District') of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District'), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations,limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to establish the appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District 85-1 for the fiscal year 2009/10; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Appropriations Limit. This Board of Directors hereby establishes the fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District No. 85-1 at $10,566,737 based on the factors of the Gann limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.62% and a population change of 1.16%). Section 2. Approval of Electorate. This Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been established by the qualified electorate at a special election held on December 10, 1985, in the manner provided by law. Section 3. Eiling. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino County and with the office of the Auditor-Controller for the State of California. P72 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 151h day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Pllmancelbudget20MCity Council staff reportAresolution-FL)CFD 85-1 Appropriations Limit 2009-10.doc P73 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,574,380 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,375,447 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RECOMMENDATION Approval of resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of$1,574,380 and the appropriations limit in the amount of$2,375,447 for fiscal year 2009/10 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The ordinance authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs (which includes personnel) to provide fire protection services within CFD 88-1. Fiscal Year 2009/10 is the twenty-first (21) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2009/10 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units. Because CFD 88-1 does not currently generate sufficient funds to fully support the total annual staffing costs, supplemental funding will be necessary thru the Fire District's General Fund budget. P74 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE PAGE 2 AMOUNT OF$1,574,380 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF$2,375,447 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 JUNE 15, 2009 The following resolutions are submitted for your consideration to adopt the fiscal year 2009/10 annual budget and appropriations limit in CFD No. 88-1. 1. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2009/10 proposed budget in the amount of$1,574,380. 2. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations limit in an amount equal to the maximum authorized. special taxes which could be levied in fiscal year 2009/10. The resolution sets an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2009/10 at $2,375,447. On June 3, 2009, the Board adopted a resolution which establishes the annual CFD special tax in order to meet budget objectives. On June 4, 2009, the Board conducted a comprehensive budget.workshop regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 88-1 budget. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 88-1 annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Res ectfully submitted, Peter M. an Fire Chief Attachments P75 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- 03) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated,proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district,all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the"Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88- 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, this legislative body has received and reviewed a budget for fiscal year 2009/10 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board,of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: "Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2009/10"and is on file in the office of the District and available for public inspection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President P76 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 2 of 2 ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANCIE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the_day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P77 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $447.49 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $344.89 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class 111 $274.43 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $239.82 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $207.66 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $189.14 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $170.58 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $688.54 per acre or$0.061 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 09- P78 Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $964.40 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class 11 $740.21 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class 111 $590.71 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $517.76 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $443.06 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $409.24 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $370.08 (less than 1795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $1,485.74 per acre or$0.1202 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2009/10 Pop. Change 'CPI 1.0016 L X -1.00 = 0.00 'CPI - California Per Capita Personal Income P79 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- 032. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009110 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, as a result of such election, the qualified electors of the District authorized the establishment of an Article XIII-B appropriations limit for the District equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to establish the appropriations limit for the District for fiscal year 2009/10. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board .of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Appropriations Limit. This legislative body hereby establishes the appropriations limit for Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for fiscal year 2009/10 in an amount equal to $2,375,447. SECTION 2. Approval by Electorate. This legislative body hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been authorized by the qualified electors of the District at a special election held on April 4, 1989, in the manner provided by law. P80 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held of the_day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P81 q. T H E C I T Y O F ...- . . .. - - , >.., ,. R A N C H '0 C U C A M 0 N C A Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT RECOMMENDATION 1. Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the fiscal year 2009/10 budget. 2. Council approve the attached resolution adopting the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2009/10. BACKGROUND 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed a one-year program of service with the 2009/10 fiscal year budget. The attached resolution adopts that one- year budget and reflects any changes recommended and approved by Council at the publicly held budget study session. FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET General Fund $ 66,424,500 Library Services $ 4,240,010 Capital Improvement Program $ 17,101,430 Special Funds $ 60,292,550 Total $148.058.490 2. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population. P82 The additional attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.62% and a population change of 1.16%), the City's fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations limit is $59,500,197. The City's fiscal year 2009/10 appropriations subject to this limit total $47,793,750. It is anticipated that the City will be at 80.3% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2010. Respectfully submitted, A/Yh"-�� Tamara L. Layne Finance Director Attachments Ofinancelbudget20101City Council staff reportslCity budget adoption 2009-10.doc -2 - P83 RESOLUTION NO. 09- 1 z RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a workshop to review the appropriation requests for the fiscal year 2009/10 on June 4th, 2009, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public hearing on the General City Budget, and; WHEREAS, this public hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation and held on June 15, 2009; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 15th day of June 2009, as follows: SECTION 1: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET. The City of Rancho Cucamonga budget for the fiscal year 2009/10, on file in the office of the Finance Director, is hereby adopted in the amount of $148,058,490. This budget total includes appropriations for both the general and other special purpose funds. SECTION 2: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN AND / OR WITHIN APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the budget. The City Manager may transfers funds between appropriations within any fund as set forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in the same fund. SECTION 3: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN FUNDS. Transfers of funds between funds as shown throughout the fund transfer sections of the budget shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers. SECTION 4: DISBURSEMENTS. The City Manager and the Finance Director, or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the fiscal year 2009/10 budget, and have the responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct expenditures by Councilmembers which require Council approval. P84 Resolution No. 09- Page 2 SECTION 5: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council may amend this temporary budget to add or delete appropriations. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15t" day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15t" day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Nfinancelbudget20101City Council staff reportslresolution-City budget 2009-10.doc P85 RESOLUTION NO. 09- �Z7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2009/10, and; WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that said appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009/10 be established in the amount of $59,500,197. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve that an appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009/10 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $59,500,197 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15r" day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor P86 Resolution 09- Page 2 ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Mfinancelbudget20101City Council staff reportslResolution-City Appropriations Limit 2009-10.doc STAFF REPORT CITI'MANAGEWS OFFICE RANCHO Date: June 15, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: A resolution authorizing the City Attorney to cooperate with the League of California Cities, other cities and counties in litigation challenging the constitutionality of any seizure by State government of the City's Street Maintenance (HUTA) funds RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 09-.137 authorizing the City Attorney to cooperate with the League of California Cities, other cities and counties in litigation challenging the constitutionality of any seizure by State government of the City's share of funding from the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), also known as the "gas tax." BACKGROUND In his final revised May Revision, the Governor proposed the seizure of almost $1 billion in city and county shares of revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) from the motor fuel tax (or gallonage gas tax) to fund past and future highway bond debt service payments out of the general fund. On June 11, 2009, the Joint Budget Conference Committee endorsed this recommendation on a party line vote. It is clear to attorneys employed and retained by the League of California Cities that this recommendation, if enacted into law, would be unconstitutional. In fact, in both 1974 and 1998 voters enacted limitations on the power of the legislature to seize and use HUTA gas tax funds, allowing only loans to the general fund.on a limited basis. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this represents a total loss of $2.8 million in HUTA revenue for Fiscal Year 2009-2010, with another substantial loss (about 75%) for the following year. Of the $2.8 million, $2 million is used for personnel costs to provide street maintenance related programs such as traffic signal maintenance and street sweeping. The League has asked cities to adopt the attached resolution for cities that wish to direct their city attorney to cooperate with the League and other cities and counties in planning litigation challenging the constitutionality of the proposed theft of city and county funds. It does not commit the City of Rancho Cucamonga to filing litigation, but it directs the City Attorney to cooperate and work with the League and other local governments to advance the litigation. If litigation proves necessary in the next month or so, we anticipate there will be some lead cities and counties, along with the League. It may eventually prove desirable to have every interested city named in the litigation. As a result, asking our City Attorney to get engaged and cooperate in the planning of this possible next step is appropriate and sends the message we will not take this lying down. A RESOLU"FION AUTHORIZING THE CITY A"I'1'ORNI'SY TO COOPi-nxrF.WITH TI1I's LI.iAGUF.OF PAGE 2 CALIFORNIA CITIES,OTHER CITIES AND COUNTIES IN LITIGATION CHAI.I.ENGING TI I CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANY SEIZURE 13Y STATE GOV I:;RNMENT OF THE CI'IY'S S'IREE T MAINTENANCE(HUTA) FUNDS JUN;15,2009 Respectfully Submitted, Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst, City Manager's Office Attachment— Resolution cc: James Markman, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 09-137 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO COOPERATE WITH THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, OTHER CITIES AND COUNTIES IN LITIGATION CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANY SEIZURE BY STATE GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY'S STREET MAINTENANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the current economic crisis has placed cities under incredible financial pressure and caused them to make painful budget cuts, including layoffs and furloughs of city workers, decreasing maintenance and operations of public facilities, and reductions in direct services to keep spending in line with declining revenues; and WHEREAS, since the early 1990s the state government of California has seized over $10 billion of city property tax revenues statewide, now amounting to over $900 million each year, to fund the state budget even after deducting public safety program payments to cities by the state; and WHEREAS, in his proposed FY 2009-10 budget the Governor has proposed transferring $1 billion of local gas taxes and weight fees to the state general fund to balance the state budget, and over$700 million in local gas taxes permanently in future years, immediately jeopardizing the ability of the City to maintain the City's streets, bridges, traffic signals, streetlights, sidewalks and related traffic safety facilities for the use of the motoring public; and WHEREAS, the loss of almost all of the City's gas tax funds will seriously compromise the City's ability to perform critical traffic safety related street maintenance, including, but not limited to, drastically curtailing patching, resurfacing, street lighting/traffic signal maintenance, payment of electricity costs for street lights and signals, bridge maintenance and repair, sidewalk and curb ramp maintenance and repair, and more; and WHEREAS, some cities report to the League of California Cities that they will be forced to eliminate part or all of their street maintenance operations while others will be forced to cut back in other areas (including public safety staffing levels) to use city general funds for basic street repair and maintenance. Furthermore, cities expect that liability damage awards will mount as basic maintenance is ignored and traffic accidents, injuries and deaths increase; and WHEREAS, in both Proposition 5 in 1974 and Proposition 2 in 1998 the voters of our state overwhelmingly imposed restriction on the state's ability to do what the Governor has proposed, and any effort to permanently divert the local share of the gas tax would violate the state constitution and the will of the voters; and WHEREAS, cities and counties maintain 81% of the state road network while the state directly maintains just 8%; and WHEREAS, ongoing street maintenance is a significant public safety concern. A city's failure to maintain its street pavement(potholes filling, sealing, overlays, etc.), traffic signals, signs, and street lights has a direct correlation to traffic accidents, injuries and deaths; and WHEREAS, according to a recent statewide needs assessment on a scale of zero (failed) to 100 (excellent), the statewide average pavement condition index (PCI) is 68, or "at risk." Local streets and roads will fall to "poor" condition (Score of 48) by 2033 based on existing funding levels available to cities and counties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereby directs the City Attorney to take all necessary steps to cooperate with the League of California Cities, other cities and counties in supporting litigation against the state of California if the legislature enacts and the governor signs into law legislation that unconstitutionally diverts the City's share of funding from the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), also known as the "gas tax," to fund the state general fund; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the city manager or clerk shall send this resolution with an accompanying letter from the mayor to the Governor and each legislator, informing them in the clearest of terms of the City's adamant resolve to oppose any effort to frustrate the will of the electorate as expressed in Proposition 5 (1974) and Proposition 2 (1998) concerning the proper use and allocation of the gas tax; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that a copy of this Resolution shall be sent by the city manager or clerk to the League of California Cities, the local chamber of commerce, and other community groups whose members are affected by this proposal to create unsafe conditions on the streets of our City for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. ADOPTED this 15`h day of June, 2009. California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment,Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. (2008), sponsored by the League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties and County Engineers Association of California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT(003) 4303 Parking Cit Surcharge-State 6,000 6,000 6,000 4304 Parking Cit Surchrge-Cnty Jail 4,500 4,500 4,500 4305 Parking Cit Surcharge-Cnty Crt 4,500 4,500 4,500 TOTAL FOR REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT: 15,000 15,000 15,000 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006) 4745 Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 420,000 390,340 406,980 TOTAL FOR CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS: 420,000 390,340 406,980 CNTY OF S.B.REIMBURSEMENTS (008) 4745 Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 80,000 80,000 85,500 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 16,170 5,500 0 TOTAL FOR CNTY OF S.B.REIMBURSEMENTS: 96,170 85,500 85,500 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND (016) 4401 Interest Earnings 85,000 89,840 76,540 4518 General Plan Update Fee 0 25,390 25,300 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 356,200 200,270 110,140 TOTAL FOR COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND: 441,200 315,500 211,980 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE(017) 4745 Other Intergov'd Reimbursemnt 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 5,100,000 4,541,900 0 TOTAL FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE: 6,600,000 6,041,900 0 INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT(019) 4401 Interest Earnings 19,000 11,600 13,030 4519 Information Technology Revenue 223,450 130,230 129,800 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 24,660 120,130 44,670 TOTAL FOR INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT: 267,110 261,960 187,500 MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM(022) 4218 Mobile Home Lot Fees-City 0 0 8,140 4219 Mobile Home Lot Fees-State 0 0 3,150 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 60 TOTAL FOR MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM: 0 0 11,350 CAPITAL RESERVE (025) 4401 Interest Earnings 1,400,000 0 0 4802 Developer Participation 750,000 750,000 0 4911 Reimbursement from Other Funds I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 RDA Reimbursement 588,000 0 0 Reimbursement from Spec, Funds 377,820 0 0 Subtotal for: 4911 965,820 0 0 8670 Transfer In-2008 TAB 1,667,050 0 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 5,456,650 2,495,770 5,356,970 TOTAL FOR CAPITAL RESERVE: 10,239,520 3,245,770 5,356,970 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY(073) 4401 Interest Earnings 158,000 147,500 136,470 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 142,000 152,500 303,620 TOTAL FOR BENEFITS CONTINGENCY: 300,000 300,000 440,090 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 4401 Interest Earnings 20,000 20,300 26,330 4901 Other Revenue 789,790 834,620 834,620 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 23,910 34,580 44,740 TOTAL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN: 833,700 889,500 905,690 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(101) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 2,900 TOTAL FOR AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER: 0 0 2,900 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT(105) 4401 Interest Earnings 800 13,300 12,870 4740 Grant Income 190,820 203,320 203,320 8001 Transfer In-General Fund 1,340 0 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 48,070 0 182,630 TOTAL FOR AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: 241,030 216,620 398,820 BEAUTIFICATION (110) 4401 Interest Earnings 66,110 86,530 45,660 4801 Beautification Fees 165,000 80,000 15,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,194,440 486,580 354,430 TOTAL FOR BEAUTIFICATION: 1,425,550 653,110 415,090 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112) 4401 Interest Earnings 121,060 194,940 121,900 4806 Storm Drain Fees 1,200,000 600,000 549,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 3,969,760 410,220 1,730,010 TOTAL FOR DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL: 5,290,820 1,205,160 2,400,910 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE(114) II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4401 Interest Earnings 64,990 48,280 19,120 4807 Secondary Regional Fee 100,000 75,000 0 TOTAL FOR DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE: 164,990 123,280 19,120 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116) 4401 Interest Earnings 11,070 56,150 55,070 4807 Secondary Regional Fee 300,000 200,000 133,000 TOTAL FOR ETIWANDA DRAINAGE: 311,070 256,150 188,070 PARK DEVELOPMENT(120) 4401 Interest Earnings 145,480 359,130 360,940 4800 Park Development Fees 700,000 500,000 89,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 9,499,920 1,676,850 460,370 TOTAL FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT: 10,345,400 2,535,980 910,310 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(122) 4401 Interest Earnings 280 540 540 TOTAL FOR SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE: 280 540 540 TRANSPORTATION (124) 4401 Interest Earnings 288,000 488,920 472,700 4804 Transportation Fee/Backbone 5,978,390 1,742,500 850,500 4805 Transportation Fee/EV Preempm 75,680 25,000 12,150 4810 Trans Fee/Arrow I-15 Int 832,430 400,000 194,400 4811 Trans Fee/Base Line]-15 Int 605,400 285,000 133,650 4812 Trans Fee/Haven RxR Grade Sep 75,680 47,500 24,300 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 4,989,050 6,322,120 1,355,630 TOTAL FOR TRANSPORTATION: 12,844,630 9,311,040 3,043,330 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126) 4401 Interest Earnings 19,910 45,920 16,510 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,105,090 0 33,490 TOTAL FOR LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE: 1,125,000 45,920 50,000 LMD#1 GENERAL CITY(130) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,103,620 1,079,550 1,051,360 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 20,000 25,000 11,760 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 3,000 4,000 4,000 4401 Interest Earnings 26,000 36,860 17,370 4901 Other Revenue 15,000 20,260 15,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 374,070 440,740 285,640 TOTAL FOR LMD#1 GENERAL CITY: 1,541,690 1,606,410 1,385,130 III CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 LMD#2 VICTORIA (131) 4101. Property Taxes-CY Secured 2,844,930 2,725,140 2,378,460 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 45,000 65,000 65,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 7,250 15,000 15,000 4401 Interest Earnings 42,000 55,530 23,640 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 415,210 595,770 620,730 TOTAL FOR LMD#2 VICTORIA: 3,354,390 3,456,440 3,102,830 LMD#3A HYSSOP(132) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,570 3,570 2,420 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 100 109 100 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 20 20 20 4401 Interest Earnings 1,000 1,360 1,340 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 2,470 0 80 TOTAL FOR LMD#3A HYSSOP: 7.160 5,050 3,960 LMD#3B MEDIANS (133) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 927,220 904,570 896,530 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 10,000 20,000 20,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,000 4,500 4,500 4401 Interest Earnings 27,500 53,010 37,930 4901 Other Revenue 500 500 500 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 261,440 364,930 351,820 TOTAL FOR LMD#3B MEDIANS: 1,227,660 1,347,510 1,311,280 LMD#4 TERRA VISTA(134) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,657,630 1,614,210 1,588,720 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 12,000 25,000 25,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,500 4,000 4,000 4401 Interest Earnings . 37,500 53,080 23,730 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 582,620 626,960 509,790 TOTAL FOR LMD#4 TERRA VISTA: 2,292,250 2,323,250 2,151,240 LMD#5 TOT LOT(135) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 4,780 4,530 4,630 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 100 130 130 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 20 30 30 4401 Interest Earnings 1,300 2,000 2,030 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 8,170 0 TOTAL FOR LMD #5 TOT LOT: 6,200 14,860 6,820 LMD#6 CARYN COMMUNITY(136) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 302,050 286,320 283,620 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 5,500 5,500 5,500 IV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 750 750 750 4401 Interest Earnings 11,000 6,280 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 195,080 133,000 50,470 TOTAL FOR LMD#6 CARYN COMMUNITY: 514,380 431,850 340,340 LMD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 765,120 756,360 747,550 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 11,500 11,500 11,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,810 2,810 2,810 4401 Interest Earnings 25,000 22,260 25,390 4419 Other Rental/Lease Income 15,000 20,860 15,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 285,830 317,390 136,550 TOTAL FOR LMD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA: 1,105,260 1,131,180 938,800 LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(138) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 27,610 25,620 25,340 4103 Property Taxes-PY See&Unsec 750 800 800 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 90 150 150 4401 Interest Earnings 3,250 2,040 840 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 19,400 28,230 12,540 TOTAL FOR LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA: 51,100 56,840 39,670 LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 717,030 688,980 708,820 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 7,000 18,500 18,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,000 3,500 3,500 4401 Interest Earnings 11,500 72,170 64,040 TOTAL FOR LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA: 736,530 783,150 794,860 LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA(140) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 426,380 402,610 395,670 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 6,500 18,500 18,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 750 4,000 4,000 4401 Interest Earnings 3,650 30,210 25,400 4901 Other Revenue 600 600 600 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 211,440 28,410 201,210 TOTAL FOR LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA: 649,320 484,330 645,380 GENERAL CITY STREET LIGHTS (150) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 1,870 1,870 TOTAL FOR GENERAL CITY STREET LIGHTS: 0 1,870 1,870 l SLD#1 ARTERIAL(151) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 724,030 707,750 686,580 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 12,500 15,000 15,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,750 3,500 3,500 4401 Interest Earnings 10,000 42,140 44,200 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 4,000 2,800 2,800 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 426,090 TOTAL FOR SLD#1 ARTERIAL: 752,280 771,190 1,178,170 SLD#2 RESIDENTIAL(152) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 317,780 321,460 323,560 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 5,500 6,500 6,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,000 1,250 1,250 4401 Interest Earnings 100 460 0 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 5,500 500 500 8999 Transfer In From,Fund Balance 71,020 102,560 69,360 TOTAL FOR SLD#2 RESIDENTIAL: 400,900 432,730 401,170 SLD#3 VICTORIA(153) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 335,920 321,380 282,810 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 5,500 7,500 7,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 900 1,500 1,500 4401 Interest Earnings 9,600 27,140 28,600 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 400 400 400 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 110,630 TOTAL FOR SLD#3 VICTORIA: 352,320 357,920 431,440 SLD#4 TERRA VISTA (154) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 150,480 144,910 141,840 4103 . Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 1,850 3,500 3,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 450 450 4401 Interest Earnings 11,500 22,250 15,400 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 80,370 TOTAL FOR SLD#4 TERRA VISTA: 164,080 171,110 241,560 SLD#5 CARYN COMMUNITY(155) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 42,320 40,200 39,740 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 1,100 1,100 1,100 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 220 , 220 220 4401 Interest Earnings 2,500 4,000 1,760 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 22,050 13,870. 64,210 TOTAL FOR SLD#5 CARYN COMMUNITY: 68,190 59,390 107,030 SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA(156) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 119,080 118,440 116,020 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 4,000 4,000 4,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 220 600 600 VI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4401 Interest Earnings 7,500 13,300 8,870 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 300 450 450 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 86,170 TOTAL FOR SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA: 131,100 . 136,790 216,110 SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA(157) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 95,260 93,960 90,830 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 1,100 2,000 2,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 350 350 4401 Interest Earnings 5,500 14,300 13,400 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 5,500 500 500 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 139,750 TOTAL FOR SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA: 107,610 111,110 246,830 SLD 48 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 391,180 365,350 374,060 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 2,000 10,000 10,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 1,500 1,500 4401 Interest Earnings 7,700 45,960 63,150 4808 Developer Energizing Fee 750 200 200 TOTAL FOR SLD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA: 401,880 423,010 448,910 GAS TAX 2105/PROP111 (170) 4401 Interest Earnings 21,470 28,920 30,800 4720 Gas Tax 2105-Prop 111 977,920 1,093,580 988,900 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 215,120 369,140 0 TOTAL FOR GAS TAX 2105/PROP111: 1,214,510 1,491,640 1,019,700 GAS TAX 2106-2107(172) 4401 Interest Earnings 13,970 26,210 5,120 4721 State Gas Tax-2106 586,170 675,400 474,000 4722 State Gas Tax-2107 1,245,620 1,447,870 1,017,000 4723 State Gas Tax-2107.5 10,000 10,000 6,000 8999 Transfer in From Fund Balance 410,370 739,640 404,170 TOTAL FOR GAS TAX 2106-2107: 2,266,130 2,899,120 1,906,290 MEASURE "I" (176) 4401 Interest Earnings 113,370 189,970 145,000 4715 Measure I Local St Allotment 1,707,300 2,611,700 2,139,200 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,908,850 1,015,660 0 TOTAL FOR MEASURE "1": 3,729,520 3,817,330 2,284,200 SB 325 (I80) 4401 Interest Earnings 2,180 190 190 VII CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 103,820 0 0 TOTAL FOR SB 325: 106,000 190 190 AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF(182) 4401 Interest Earnings 500 130 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 259,500 0 0 TOTAL FOR AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF: 260,000 130 0 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE(186) 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 65,430 60,850 72,240 TOTAL FOR FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE: 65,430 60,850 72,240 INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT(188) 4134 Integrated Waste Mgmt Fee 1,126,600 1,107.690 1,079,910 4401 Interest Earnings 0 78,590 88,690 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 9,120 0 TOTAL FOR INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT: 1,126,600 1,195,400 1,168,600 PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT(190) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 68,520 15,860 4740 Grant income 600,000 1,658,960 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 588,000 0 434,140 TOTAL FOR PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT: 1,188,000 1,727,480 450,000 BICYCLE TRANSPORT ACCT GRANT(192) 4740 Grant Income 0 586,000 1,270,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 586,000 1,663,000 0 TOTAL FOR BICYCLE TRANSPORT ACCT GRANT: 586,000 2,249,000 1,270,000 PROPOSITION 1B STATE FUNDING(194) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 45,000 101,090 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 2,730,000 0 TOTAL FOR PROPOSITION 1B STATE FUNDING: 0 2,775,000 101,090 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT(204) 4740 Grant Income 1,286,070 1,286,070 3,485,050 4741 Program Income 90,000 90,000 90,000 TOTAL FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK 1,376,070 1,376,070 3,575,050 GRNT: PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214) l 4740 Grant Income 0 0 1,602,140 VIll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager 1 Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,990,000 1,335,500 0 TOTAL FOR PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3: 1,990,000 1,335,500 1,602,140 PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND(216) 4401 Interest Earnings 930 230 90 TOTAL FOR PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND: 930 230 90 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT(225) 4740 Grant Income 54,660 44,000 45,000 TOTAL FOR CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT: 54,660 44,000 45,000 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT(226) 4740 Grant Income 43,000 40,000 43,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 7,850 0 0 TOTAL FOR USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT: 50,850 40,000 43,000 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 4740 Grant Income 0 0 517,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 154,000 175,890 115,290 TOTAL FOR SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM: 154,000 175,890 632,290 RECREATION SERVICES,(250) 4401 Interest Earnings 19,000 71,210 39,270 4419 Other Rental/Lease Income 749,180 860,200 842,330 4520 Recreation Fees 2,229,960 2,385,900 2,237,490 4522 Processing Fees 56,400 41,350 31,550 4571 Sale of Taxable Items 12,900 9,900 14,100 4581 Ticket Sales 787,490 977,310 701,890 4586 Advertising Revenue 9,700 14,500 12,000 4901 Other Revenue 47,400 105,650 141,630 4905 Contributions/Fund Raising 390,790 409,830 421,040 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 436,830 718,290 642,240 TOTAL FOR RECREATION SERVICES: 4,739,650 5,594,140 5,083,540 SENIOR TRANSPORT SERVICE-CNTY(271) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 7,180 2,070 4740 Grant Income 200,000 100,000 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 330 0 127,650 TOTAL FOR SENIOR TRANSPORT SERVICE-CNTY: 200,330 107,180 129,720 LIBRARY FUND (290) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 2,936,470 3,119,600 3,248,700 4102 Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 81,010 79,220 79,820 IX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 101,890 109,970 119,320 4105 Property Taxes-Supplemental 334,960 282,820 118,610 4312 Library Fines and Fees 240,000 210,000 170,000 4401 Interest Earnings 105,000 118,120 125,060 4410 Media Rentals 120,000 110,000 90,000 4411 Special Event Rental 3,000 3,000 0 4512 Library Card&Merchndse Sales 5,600 2,000 0 4514 Technology Center Revenue 0 7,000 0 4515 Information Service Fees 2,000 300 500 4570 Sale of Printed Materials 10,000 18,000 18,000 4906 CLSA Direct Loan 100,000 90,000 60,000 4907 Private Contributions Library 130,000 150,000 150,000 4908 Public Library Foundation 98,020 60,000 60,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 179,880 129,380 0 TOTAL FOR LIBRARY FUND: 4,447,230 4,489,410 4,240,010 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298) 4740 Grant Income 36,400 36,400 36,400 4909 RC Library Foundation Support 14,000 15,000 15,000 8290 Transfer In-Library Fund 45,160 45,420 45,420 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 5,680 TOTAL FOR CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN: 95,560 96,820 102,500 THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT(301) 4740 Grant Income 0 20,000 40,000 4909 RC Library Foundation Support 0 5,000 0 TOTAL FOR THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT: 0 25,000 40,000 LIBRARY SERVICES &TECH. ACT(302) 4740 Grant Income 0 50,000 0 TOTAL FOR LIBRARY SERVICES & TECH.ACT: 0 50,000 0 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT(308) 8001 Transfer In-General Fund 1,490 0 0 TOTAL FOR FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT: 1,490 0 0 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 4401 Interest Earnings 8,300 1,650 0 4740 Grant Income 193,560 0 0 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 203,690 122,000 TOTAL FOR COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE: 201,860 205,340 122,000 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG) (361) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 410 0 X CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 TOTAL FOR JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG): 0 410 0 OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT(371) 4740 Grant Income .35,710 0 0 TOTAL FOR OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT: 35,710 0 0 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT(380) 4740 Grant Income 0 0 15,000 TOTAL FOR DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT: 0 0 15,000 HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PRGM (390) 4740 Grant Income 152,900 0 0 TOTAL FOR HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PRGM: 152,900 0 0 AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602) 4401 Interest Earnings 24,500 30,410 29,400 TOTAL FOR AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO: 24,500 30,410 29,400 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA (607) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 1,400 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA: 0 0 1,400 CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK(608) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 9,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK: 0 0 9,000 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT(610) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 30,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT: 0 0 30,000 CFD 2001-01 (612) 4401 Interest Earnings 100,000 10,000 13,270 TOTAL FOR CFD 2001-01: 100,000 10,000 13,270 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614) 4401 Interest Earnings 183,820 0 1,700 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND: 183,820 0 1,700 4 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER(615) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 2,200 Xl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year , Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 - 2008/09 2009/10 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 294,120 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER: 0 294,120 2,200 CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES (617) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 21,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES: 0 0 21,000 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE (680) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 59,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 750 750 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE: 750 750 59,000 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66(681) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 14,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 4,130 0 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66: 4,130 0 14,000 SPORTS COMPLEX(700) 4126 Admissions Tax 30,000 30,000 30,000 4220 Other Licenses&Permits 500 500 500 4411 Special Event Rental 25,000 25,000 20,000 4419 Other Rental/Lease Income 0 75,000 75,000 4425 Stadium Lease-Parking Lt Reimb 66,000 66,000 66,000 4426 Stadium Lease-Minimum Rent 84,000 84,000 80,000 4427 Stadium Lease-Addt'l Rent(%) 31,000 31,000 3L000 4428 Stadium Lease-Office Rent 4,150 4,150 4,150 4520 Recreation Fees 342,240 269,050 273,660 4562 Maintenance Fees 15,000 15,000 10,000 4573 Concession Sales 1,000 1,000 800 4580 Stadium Security Reimbursement 81,500 81,500 83,750 4582 Special Events 400 400 400 4583 Baseball Security Reimb. 42,000 42,000 42,000 4585 Parking Fees-Sports Complex 41,000 41,000 41,000 4901 Other Revenue 13,500 15,420 15,420 8001 Transfer In-General Fund 854,530 889,190 716,390 TOTAL FOR SPORTS COMPLEX: 1,631,820 1,670,210 1,490,070 MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 115,860 87,590 4601 Monthly Srvc Fee-Electric Util 100,000 150,000 343,080 4602 Commodity Fee-Electric Util. 7,900,000 9,000,000 8,662,900 4603 New Srvc Activation Fee-Util. 1,500 2,500 1,000 4605 Wholesale Energy Sales&Cntrt 0 0 1,930,400 �. 4610 Late Fee-Electric Utility 0 0 11,500 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 578,360 503.130 0 XII CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 TOTAL FOR MUNICIPAL UTILITY: 8,579,860 9,771,490 11,036,470 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND (706) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 14,560 22,030 4609 Public Benefit Fund-Elec Util 225,150 225,150 302,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 63,490 - 0 TOTAL FOR UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND: 225,150 303,200 324,030 EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT(712) 4401 Interest Earnings 350,000 382,620 328,600 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 2,479,750 1,479,360 1,415,940 TOTAL FOR EQUIP/VEIIICLE REPLACEMENT: 2,829,750 1,861,980 1,744,540 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND(714) 4401 Interest Earnings 140,000 143,700 105,040 4540 Intragovernmental User Fees 344,270 344,270 4,270 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,181,820 324,710 538,740 TOTAL FOR COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND: 1,666,090 812,680 648,050 CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805) 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 15,000 500 500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 500 250 250 4401 Interest Earnings 500 10 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND: 16,000 760 750 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT(812) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 275,020 225,260 256,080 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 5,500 3,500 2,560 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,250 350 260 4401 Interest Earnings 12,500 38,570 36,260 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 15,410 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT: 294,270 283,090 295,160 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR(813) 4401 Interest Earnings 85,000 97,000 53,960 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 215,000 0 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR: 300,000 97,000 53,960 CFD 88-2 POLICE(815) 4401 Interest Earnings 200 200 230 8812 Transfer In-AD 88-2 Debt Srvc. 700 700 700 L , XIII CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 TOTAL FOR CFD 88-2 POLICE: 900 900 930 CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION (820) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 2,597,780 2,855,820 2,565,750 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 0 4,500 25,660 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 350 2,570 4401 Interest Earnings 20,000 18,650 15,200 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 114,110 0 1,244,520 TOTAL FOR CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION: 2,731,890 2,879,320 3,853,700 CFD 2004-01 RESERVE (821) 4401 Interest Earnings 50,000 89,100 47,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2004-01 RESERVE: 50,000 89,100 47,000 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 31,540 29,280 27,500 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 750- 350 350 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 150 80 80 4401 Interest Earnings 4,100 6,030 5,430 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 86,750 6,000 19,080 TOTAL FOR AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON: 123,290 41,740 52,440 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(841) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 249,230 249,230 248,020 4401 Interest Earnings 7,000 6,710 11,900 TOTAL FOR AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER: 256,230 255,940 259,920 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE(842) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 423,890 415,410 423,890 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 0 4,240 0 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 100 0 4401 Interest Earnings 8,500 6,630 5,590 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 108,730 0 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE: 541,120 426,380 429,480 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND(848) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,085,130 1,056,600 1,035,040 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 25,000 25,000 25,000 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 6,500 6,500 6,500 4401 Interest Earnings 25,000 69,910 47,460 4901 Other Revenue 8,250 15,230 9,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 364,020 494,900 855,460 J XIV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 TOTAL FOR PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND: 1,513,900 1,668,140 1,978,460 CFD 2000-01 SO ETTWANDA RDMPTN(852) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 125,090 115,970 119,590 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 5,000 5,000 1,200 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 750 750 120 4401 Interest Earnings 500 100 7,030 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 5,330 0 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN: 131,340 127,150 127,940 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RSRV(853) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 1,100 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RSRV: 0 0 1,100 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 324,600 324,600 323,420 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 2,000 2,000 2,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 250 250 4401 Interest Earnings 11,250 22,520 13,910 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 721,410 0 0 TOTAL FOR AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION: 1,059,510 349,370 340,080 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING RESERVE (855) 4401 Interest Earnings 0 0 18,000 TOTAL FOR AD 1999-1 REFUNDING RESERVE: 0 0 18,000 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP(856) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 553,570 564,520 557,930 4401 Interest Earnings 4,000 8,340 7,740 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 6,640 0 13,190 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP: 564,210 572,860 578,860 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RSRV(857) 4401 Interest Earnings 21,000 25,000 6,800 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RSRV: 21,000 25,000 6,800 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP (858) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 720,100 620,320 618,260 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 0 6,500 6,180 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 650 650 4401 Interest Earnings 16,950 8,840 9,660 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 2,313,190 XV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager t Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP: 737,050 636,310 2,947,940 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RSRV(859) 4401 Interest Earnings 7,500 25,000 7,100 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RSRV: 7,500 25,000 7,100 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,211,280 1,091,370 1,024,120 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 16,000 60,000 10,240 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,500 10,000 1,240 4401 Interest Earnings 10,000 5,700 22,000 8999 Transfer In From.Fund Balance 0 0 127,610 TOTAL FOR CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION: 1,239,780 1,167,070 1,185,210 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE(861) 4401 Interest Earnings 35,000 38,000 11,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE: 35,000. 38,000 11,000 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 83,920 88,910 88,910 4401 Interest Earnings 2,250 1,250 250 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 520 0 9,120 TOTAL FOR CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION: 86,690 90,160 98,280 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE(863) 4401 Interest Earnings 2,500 3,200 800 TOTAL FOR CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE: 2,500 3,200 800 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,025,230 1,056,760 1,044,060 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec &Unsec 0 3,000 10,440 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 450 1,050 4401 Interest Earnings 16,000 10.000 18,590 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN: 1,035,230 1,070,210 1,074,140 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE (865) 4401 Interest Earnings 48,000 60,000 15,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE: 48,000 60,000 15,000 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866) l 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 204,150 205,070 205,070 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 8,500 0 0 xv] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES Adopted Adopted Manager Budget Budget Rcmd. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Object/Description 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,250 0 0 4401 Interest Earnings 850 2,200 2,510 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN: 214,750 207,270 207,580 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE(867) 4401 Interest Earnings 9,300 10,200 3,000 TOTAL FOR CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE: 9,300 10,200 3,000 CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE(868) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 340,200 293,120 295,380 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 0 2,500 2,500 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 350 350" 4401 Interest Earnings 6,800 2,800 17,320 TOTAL FOR CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE: 347,000 298,770 315,550 CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION (869) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 406,200 406,200 457,680 4103 Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 0 0 4,580 4104 Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 0 410 4401 Interest Earnings 10,000 360 5,540 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 2,220 2,419,260 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION: 416,200 408,780 2,887,470 CFD 2006-01 RESERVE (870) 4401 Interest Earnings 3,500 5,800 6,300 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-01 RESERVE: 3,500 5,800 6,300 CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION (871) 4101 Property Taxes-CY Secured 224,290 255,880 255,880 4401 Interest Earnings 5,000 980 2,860 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION: 229,290 256,860 258,740 CFD 2006-02 RESERVE(872) 4401 Interest Earnings 1,500 2,600 3,300 TOTAL FOR CFD 2006-02 RESERVE: 1,500 2,600 3,300 TOTAL FOR ENTITY: 186,221,010 165,258,780 151,860,820 XVII