HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/10/24 - Agenda PacketJ ~ ..
•
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
RANQHO
~,;UCAMONGA OCTOBER 24, 2007 - 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
•
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher
Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly _
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting Minutes of October 10, 2007
~~ IV. CONSENT CALENDAR ~~
The following Consent Calendar~tems are expected to be routine and non-controversial
They w~H be acted on by the Commission atone time without drscussron If anyone has
concern over any item, ~t should be removed for d~scuss-on
A APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO VACATE EXCESS DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ON A PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO 1843,
A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, LOCATED IN THE ALTA LOMA AREA
OF THE CITY NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MANZANITA DRIVE AND
BUCKTHORN AVENUE, BY RYAN CHANCE, V-212 - APN 1062-121-26
1 of 4
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
OCTOBER 24, 2007
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
B. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO VACATE EXCESS DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ON A PORTION OF LOT 16, TRACT 6313, A RESIDENTIAL
LOT, LOCATED AT 5830 BUCKTHORN AVENUE, NORTH OF
MANZANITA DRIVE/ BY RYAN CHANCE, V-213 -APN 1062-121-16
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items are public hearings rn which concerned rndwiduals may voice their
opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and
address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be
(invited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign rn after speaking
C MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK
CAPELLINO - A request to amend an Engineering Department condition of
approval, requiring existing utilities (communication and electrical, except
for the 66kV electrical) to be placed underground, for a recently completed
office/warehouse complex consisting of 11 buildings totaling 126,843
square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN 0209-211-19 Related File
Tentative Parcel Map TPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-
00804 A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was
adopted on March 23, 2005 This project does not raise or create new
environmental impacts not already considered in the previously adopted
Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore no subsequent
environmental review is needed CONTINUED FROM
SEPTEMBER 26, 2007
D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre
into three parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located on the west
side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street at 6970 East Avenue -
APN 0227-121-34. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration
of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUANCE
REQUESTED TO THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 MEETING
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This rs the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be
discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda
•
•
•
2 of 4
•
•
•
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
OCTOBER 24, 2007
RANCHO
C'„ ~UCAMONGA
VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m
adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent
of the Commrssron
1, Lors J Schrader, Planning Commrssron Secretary of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga,
or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was
posted on ,October 18, 2007 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government
Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Crv~c Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,
please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48
hours prior to the meeting wdl enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all
persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If
others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with
a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire
group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should
refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the
Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the
staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After
speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is
important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to
Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual
3 of 4
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
RANCHO OCTOBER 24, 2007
G'[JCAMONGA
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public
Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the
agenda
Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission
Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners
All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing
The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the
meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the
offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public
inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00
p m ,except for legal City holidays
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may
appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any
appeal fled must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a
fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are
established and governed by the City Council)
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at
http:/lwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
•
•
•
4 of 4
THE C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
s~,ff Report
Date: October 24, 2007
To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Dan James, Senior Civic Engineer
By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO VACATE EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON A
PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1843, A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT,
LOCATED IN THE ALTA LOMA AREA OF THE CITY NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF
MANZANITA DRIVE AND BUCKTHORN AVENUE; BY RYAN CHANCE; V-212
-APN: 1062-121-26.
• BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Parcel Map No. 1843, generally located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Buckthorn Avenue, in the
Very Low Residential, Development District, was recorded on July 9, 1975. This Parcel Map contained
easements for the anticipated public drainage waters existing at the time. In the period since this Parcel
Map recorded, several additional subdivisions have developed to the north which significantly cutoff and
reduce the drainage area and flows to and across the subject property (APN: 1062-121-26). The
remaining 5 foot wide drainage easement will be sufficient to contain the current drainage volume.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the fording, through minute action, that the
easement vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City
Council for further process and final approval.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Dan Jam
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ MB/rlc
• Attachments
ITEM A
Drainage Easement Vacation (V-212)
NOT TO SCALE
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
ENGINEERING
DIVISION
71,1 "r' ,~ 5 i ~`
` N
tiAkrtlond Sk ~~1 I A and St ~I_,1~,~ ~ ~ ~ - ~
`_ __ _ `- - __ _.~. al ;~,.Befla ~ifsta`~Dr µ`~
I _ ~ l -~ . _ _- --- - _-
i ~ ~ °~ La Senda RiE- y-may Ga~Sen
~`
,a
Item: Vicinity Map
Title: Portion of a Drainage
Easement Vacation
EXHIBIT: 1
t
., ,~1
~.--~ ~
•
•
•
A-1
E~(HIBIT A
DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION (V-212)
VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT
RECORDED IN BOOK 8971, PAGE 974, OFFICIAL RECORDS
VACATION DESCRIPTION
THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 174 FEET OF PARCEL NO 4 OF PARCEL
MAP NO 1843, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLATE RECORDED IN BOOK
23 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; EXCEPTING
THEREFROM A REMAINDER STRIP OF LAND 5 00 FEET WIDE ALONG THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE COMMENCING AT A POINT ON
THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO 1843, SAID POINT
BEING S 89°39'28"WAND 2 50 FEET WESTERLY OF THE NORTH EAST
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4, THENCE S 0°34'56" E A DISTANCE OF
36.24 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT, THENCE S 16°21'08" E A DISTANCE
OF 23 65 FEET
REMAINING EASEMENT CONTAINING 299 45 S F MORE OR LESS
SEE EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE
MADE A PART HEREOF
PREPARED BY
~~ i
DOUG S L GOODMAN, RCE 28500
REGI~ATION EXPIRES 3/31/08
1t~ ~. ~
~ASSOC I RTES
2079 SKY vlEw ORIvE
COL TON. CA 92324
(9091 824-2775
r 4L
~f ~ ~a J \ ( ~ ~•
~;.`(
Ch r ~ =' Y' =',
~~
u~~'~,,
r_ , r_~ N, , ',-~ ~,~
rt ~`'Sr-'" it f
EASEMENT PLAT
PORTION OF PARCEL N0. 4 OF PARCEL MAP 1843
PMB 22/44
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EXHIBIT B S89?39'028~
(V-212) TPO6~
I
I I
~ SEE DETAIL 'A' v,`n~ I
S89°39'28"W 100 OS' ~~' I''~,/~ c~ - I
~ w ~• co M ~
` I
~o ~ ~ M ° ~
~~I ~~, ~ I
i ~ I ~ III \ I
25' VACATION ! ~ I ° r~l
OF EX DRAINAGE i ~ ~ i REMAINDER 5' WIDE
0
0
v
F'r] F~
r'J-1J ~ ~~ l ~
M
°
0
0
z
~~~
,-
~-
~r~r~., J
EASEMENT II ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~\
i r' i 23 65' ''1
`~` o\ 23 30' N16°21'08"W
~` o ~
~ -
S73°38' 2"W ~" Z ~ Jr J J
5 0 0 a' - - r
POB
5 0'
2 5'
2 5'
N rf~r~ ~` r J~JJ ~ .~,~ J ~ DETAIL ' A'
JJ JI ~ ., lJr~ I ~ ., ~J ~
O
PIIJ J ~ 'J ~:3 `~
`?
30' VACATION ,-'~~
OF EX DRAINAGE ,-~'~~
EASEMENT '~~~
EXISTING 30' DRAINAGE w I Jr J
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE ~
AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES, i9 rf~r]rr J~IJ~ ~,~J.~
RECORDED IN BOOK 8971,
PAGE 974, 0 R
~ S89°39'28"W 139 09' \\
I \
I \
I \
I \
A%~ Q'~OFES,S;~~~
,~:~ :~ S ~C~~l~,e
~(/p (~; ~ ~ OC'~G2~
' . ~"~ m
•`,'J f
SJ ~\C(\/I~~'j
'1 .~r CA1_\Y~~
°--~
40
2079 SKY VIEW DRIVE
~, ]~,~ ~, ~j COL TON, CA 92324
ASSOC I RTES 1909) 824-2775
A-3
SCALE 1 "= 40'
0 40 80 120
EASEMENT PLAT
PORTION OF PARCEL NO 4 OF PARCEL MAP 1843
PMB 22/44
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
Date: October 24, 2007
To• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Dan James, Senior Civic Engineer
By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO VACATE EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON A
PORTION OF LOT 16, TRACT 6313, A RESIDENTIAL LOT, LOCATED AT
5830 BUCKTHORN AVENUE NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE; BY RYAN CHANCE; V-213
-APN. 1062-121-16.
• BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tract No 6313, generally located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Beryl Street, m the Very Low
Residential, Development District, was recorded on February 23, 1962. This Tract contains easements
for the anticipated public drainage waters existing at the time. In the period since this Tract recorded,
several additional subdivisions have developed to the north, as well as the widening of Banyan Street
resulting in a significant cutoff and reduction in the drainage area and flows to and across the subject
property (APN• 1062-121-16). The remaining 10 foot wide drainage easement will be sufficient to
contain the current drainage volume.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the
easement vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City
Council for further process and final approval
Respectfully submitted,
C/ ~ ~-
Dan Jam
Senior Civil Engineer
• DJ.MB/rlc
Attachments
ITEM B
Drainage Easement Vacation (V-213)
NOT TO SCALE
~ °~ ia~Senda Ri~~ -~-
~~I~ ,~~FL~-~~
p _
''?54' ~~,_tl~.~~._.li~~ ~ ~w~
~~~~,~:~~~ 11.~i~.
~~ herd Sts~~-.~ i.,T....M«~ L
~~ ~~ ~,f~~~~ (~' ; ~ Been
~` ~7
~, -{
•
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
ENGINEERING
DIVISION
Item: Vicinity Map
Title: Portion of a Drainage
Easement Vacation
EXHIBIT: 1
•
B-1
EXHIBIT Q
DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION (V-213)
VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER TRACT NO 6313, RECORDED IN BOOK 82, PAGES 67-68,
OFFICIAL RECORDS
VACATION DESCRIPTION
THE EAST 20' OF THE WEST 30' OF LOT 16, TRACT 6313 IN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, PER BOOK 82, PAGES 67-68 OFFICIAL RECORDS
REMAINING DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONTAINING 1478 60 S F. MORE
OR LESS
SEE EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE
MADE A PART HEREOF
PREPARED BY
~f
DOU L GOODMAN, RCE 28500
REG RATION EXPIRES 3/31/08
~~~. ~.
ASSOCIATES
2079 SKY VIEW DRIVE
CDLTON, CA 92324
(9091 824-2775
~S ~ GOp~ Fyn
O p R
~ No 2ssoo z
Exp 03-3 i-OQ ~
9~crvl~ _a~~~
EASEMENT PLAT
LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP 6313
M B 82/67-68
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EXHIBIT B
(V-213)
I JI" l~
w
co
N ~ ~
~` v I
m M I
in °
o ~
i
Z ~
> ~
rn
N ~
N
cr
W
S89°38'46"W 172 50'
20' VACATION OF EXIST
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I Jr l~
7f~r] ~ r ~~lJ , ~,~ J ,~
EXIST 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER TRACT NO 6313,
M B 82/67-68 0 R
REMAINDER 10' WIDE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
16~ $$'
15°28 2011W
S
I J7 l 7
o ~~~ ~c~
y m
No 28500 ~ ~
Exp 03-37-08 ~
9~ CIVIC ¢~~Q-
~F CA1~\F~~
~/~/~
40
2079 SKY VIEW DRIVE
COLTON, CA 92324
(9091 824-2775
ASSOCIATES
D
-~ ~ u
u n
~ ~
o w °
~o 0
W O N
~ o rn
3 0'
SCALE 1"= 40'
W
C
O
i
i 9
,~
i L
I
,~~ 2
G
`'~. R,
3 ~,
0 40 80
EASEMENT PLAT
LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP 6313
M B 82/67-68
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
12
T H E C I T Y O F
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING D E P A R T M E N T
Date: October 24, 2007
To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO - A
request to amend an Engineering Department condition of approval, requiring existing utilities
(communication and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) to be placed underground, for a
recently completed office/warehouse complex consisting of 11 buildings totaling
126,843 square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5),
located at 9850 6th Street - APN: 0209-211-19 Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map
TPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts not already considered in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative
Declaration and therefore no subsequent environmental review is needed. CONTINUED
• FROM SEPTEMBER 26, 2007.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
This item was heard at the September 26, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. Attached is a complete
copy of the staff report, related documents, and minutes of the meeting The Planning Commission
voted unanimously for staff to prepare a resolution of approval utilizing Option 2. Option 2 recommends
the conditions be modified requiring an in-lieu fee for electric undergrounding for both Parcel 1 and 2
Parcel Map 15948, however the communication lines would still be undergrounded.
At the previous Planning Commission meeting the developer stated the communication lines belong to
Charter Communications. Staff stated there should be nothing unique regarding undergrounding Charter
facilities. Therefore, the direction given was to underground the communication lines. However, the
developer has discovered that the communication lines do not belong to Charter; they actually belong to
Southern California Edison Staff has called Edison and confirmed this. Edison also informed staff that if
the communication lines are required to be undergrounded they would have to place along the same
path as the previous electrical unergrounding plans Edison also expressed concerns that similar
extraordinary work would have to be performed for the communication lines as would have been for the
electrical fines.
Given the new information of the communication lines and the Planning Commission discussions at the
meeting of Septemeber 26, 2007, staff has prepared a resolution of approval to modify the condition.
The modification will not require any undergrounding but will require payment of in-lieu fee.
•
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01 1 85 -MARK CAPELLINO
October 24, 2007
Page 2 •
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve modification, to require in-lieu fee for both
electrical and communications lines instead of undergrounding, to the approved DRC2003-01185
conditions of approval Resolution No 05-24 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Dan James
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ MB/rlc
Attachments. September 26, 2007, Staff Report with related documents
September 26, 2007, Planning Commission Minutes
Resolution of Approval
•
•
C-1
•
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C A M O N G A
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING D E P A R T M E N T
Date: September 26, 2007
To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO - A
request to amend an Engineering Department condition of approval, requiring existing utilities
(communication and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) to be placed underground, for a
recently completed office/warehouse complex consisting of 11 buildings totaling
126,843 square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5),
located at 9850 6th Street - APN. 0209-211-19 Related Files. Tentative Parcel Map
SUTPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission approved DRC2003-01185 through the adoption of its Resolution No 05-24
on March 23, 2005. Engineering Division Condition No 3 reads as follows.
The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except for the 66kV
electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire
project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15948,
extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement
acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first All services crossing 6th Street
shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a
reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost occurs on the
opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement
agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the
City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
The condition requires undergrounding of utilities to the first pole past both the easterly and westerly
property boundaries The first pole to the west is about 30 feet beyond the property boundary The first
pole to the east is about 20 feet beyond the property boundary, however, because of the Railroad tracks
and the undergrounding being placed on the south side of the street, undergrounding will have to occur
to the second pole, about 200 feet beyond the property boundary With both Parcel 1 and 2 frontage and
the extension to the poles beyond the property boundaries the total length is about 900 feet. Since the
66kV electrical lines are not being undergrounded the power poles will remain
The subject project is a development of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15948 Parcel Map 15948 was approved
~y the Planning Commission on August 13, 2003, as a two lot subdivision. Parcel 1 has an existing
tructure and Parcel 2 was vacant The subdivision was approved with a condition that upon
development of Parcel 2 the utility undergrounding across both Parcels 1 and 2 would be required. The
frontage of Parcel 1 is 299 feet and the frontage of Parcel 2 is 366 for a total length of 665 feet The
development is located on the north side of 6th Street between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue
C-2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
September 26, 2007
Page 2
All the properties, except one, along 6th Street are developed and any likelihood of the entire block being
undergrounded is remote. The one undeveloped property is located at the northwest corner of 6th Street
and Hermosa Avenue and has about 330 feet of 6th Street frontage This site has just recently been
submitted for development
The developer's synopsis is attached The cost to underground the 900 feet is about $770,000 for a cost
per foot of $860 The City's normal estimated cost per foot is $259 Also of the 900 feet, 230 feet
extends beyond the property frontage What causes these costs to be unusually high is this
undergrounding is near an Edison's substation and three 6 foot by 12 foot by 7 foot Edison vaults are
required.
On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No 87-96 establishing a revised
policy for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities. This policy was intended "to remove
unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and
living environment within the City " The Resolution states that the policy applies to all developments
except those specifically exempted "and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission "
Overhead utilities include telecommunication (phone and cable) and electrical but excludes 66KV or
larger electrical lines The Commission's utility undergrounding policy includes seven exemptions,
however, the project did not qualify for any of these exemptions. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the
original intent of the policy and the assumptions made Staff has reviewed all the original staff reports
regarding the drafting of the policy On October 10, 1985, the Planning Commission held a workshop to
formulate a policy and established general policy direction
1 All types of streets should have utilities placed underground as a condition of land development, •
and
2 Actual undergrounding may be deferred and in-lieu fees paid in those circumstances where the
Planning Commission felt it was impractical to underground at the present time; and
3. The obligation to underground should be shared equally by properties on both sides of a street in
proportion to their frontage length
ANALYSIS:
The developer is requesting due consideration from the Planning Commission. A suggested
consideration is that the developer not have to underground but pay his property frontage in-lieu fee
based upon the City's adopted amount of $259. Should the Commission grant the request to pay the
in-lieu fee as opposed to actual undergrounding it should include the frontage of both Parcel 1 and
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15948. Therefore, the total length of in-lieu fee undergrounding would be 665
feet times $259 which makes the total underground in-lieu fee $172,235
The developer did not make a request regarding the communication lines therefore, they should still be
required to underground the communication lines
Whatever the Planning Commission decides for DRC2003-01185 will be what staff also uses for the
undeveloped property at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the
City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in March 23, 2005, in connection with the City's approval
of DRC2003-01185. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR
or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same
C-3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
September 26, 2007
Page 3
project unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe
impacts on the environment, (ii) substantial changes have occurred m the circumstances under which the
project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new
important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously
considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different
mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts Staff has evaluated the proposed
modification of the utility undergrounding condition, and concludes that substantial changes to the project
or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe
impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the
project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration,
not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation
measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. None of
the previously adopted mitigation measures were concerning above-ground utilities Therefore, pursuant
to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no
additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the modification
of the utility undergrounding condition
RECOMMENDATIOPI:
Consider the staff report along with public testimony, and continue the item to the October 24, 2007,
hearing with direction to staff to prepare an appropriate resolution The options to consider are:
.Option 1. Approve the applicant's request to modify conditions requiring in-lieu fee for electric
undergrounding for 366 feet of their development frontage Communication lines will still be
undergrounded
Option 2 Modify conditions requiring in-lieu fee for electric undergrounding for both Parcel 1 and 2
Parcel Map 15948 for frontage of 665 feet. Communication lines will still be
undergrounded
Option 3 Deny the applicant's request and require undergrounding per the conditions of approval
Respectfully submitted,
Dan James ~~~
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ MB/rlc
Attachments. Vicinity Map
Site Map
Aerial View Map
Parcel/Utility Map
Site Pictures
DRC2003-01185/PM 16445
Parcel Map 15948
Utility Under Grounding Resolution 87-96
Developer's Synopsis
DRC2003-01185 Approved Resolution 05-24
C-4
•
v~~~n~~y ~~~
~N
•
C-5
•
I~
i
i
~~~
~p
~i,
I'
~~
I
,i
~!
~~ •
Site Map
C-6
•
•
Aerial View Map
^N
-~
•
Parcel /Utility Map
-8
~r .
~AI~ ~
ifs V
^^ a
i~
i4+Miw ry.
t ~ '~~t
i r k~9ti
~r,,, . ,t
+1fr i'` sF`r
T ~!
y ~N~. ~ 1,7f,i,rJ ~~{~
Rif r r~~+Ar ril ~b~V~ "ij i'~~~fqq
rrr~~r4~ ay~.r..if, ^ p sP~'~Fi` ' r ~rf~i ~
~+ t+r/.A ~~14 44e.E .. i~'. 5Y ~yL~C1~
.~'~3~~~~I;al~ 4r~V,~,;;~?
3¢k rt,~id vt ~^ {Y~ri'~~d''"~M1e~~~1 ~'~
~ i' .~ V 1'7~ s `~ rdii r~Cl
F~ i 14 ~r 3u uy3 LrGr'°`
~ca
M'
7~~i
dr' +tj.
C
~1J1fiR~ ~ +;i~
~tf u`i r i ~r
~~kf4fi~ ' L~4
~~ y~rl
iy~(`' ~ !t ;' P
~r F,'r +`~Xn
irk f''" ;'~ ' `~`
't`:._.i ~_ ~~i ,rtd'~~ ~ err
•
c:
,;
Q
~Of
yNyJJ
Q ~j
U Y
~LLwgm
U
0 =
Z~5~
N ~
0
NU
Z_K
ao=~
~ N
~~~a~
W ~
~m .NO
<N
NF~
u
,Ovito
~~¢
LLo
u
Z~[S,z
OOON
~z°~~
~ ~ ~ W
~~~~a
V~~
`, o a
~20~
U
o_O
~~~
~~m~
~ON~
<m
U=~
FWm
S
Z
.o.~ _°.,o..
~. ~S ~ t • ¢ K ~ -- ~
ii d„ dF
s- - -~i s- -~i r '
~~ i~
~~
~,
~~ ~,
,~
t
I
H
I
i
i
i
t
I
~ ~~ ~
~----- - - - - - ----------c-~~
~~ ~d~a ~ ~ g~~ ~~
~ ,~~ ~ ~~r i~~ ~~~ ,~~~ i~
~~ ~ 0-i' ~~ 1~ ~~~~ ~~
g ~~~~ ~ I~~r ~~~ ~~~ F~~ ~~~
'~
F1'Y ~~ :~t~ F~~ F~~ ! ~~ F~~s
~ a~ sy 'y ~1tFf ~
~!~>< ~ ~~1~ ~~4r ~~Gt ~FQit ;9p~
O A 9 O ® 0 0
i
I
turd r tow
I [ 'TH7HVd
I
~n-inwn r
----- ~ u
-~e ~~~
~ag
1
e~~~ ~
oo
{t~b . m
~
~ '
r
,~ ~
p
1~
~ u
6
~ 7 i ^S SR ;: 8p 6$ 6C RRB ~~ RB Ba a
4~~ "
" " ~ ~9 3? 33 s? ?~ ~~ ~ 93 ~ 9 ~9 33 i
OO[/[B 'H W d '1.1.OP ON drW 1HOHVd
L 'fHabbd ~r iwi w
J Hrd r tON ,.Jy~p7p~g ~yy3
w
-' - - - 4
_ ~-~ - -
I II I
~ ~lipv ~ II I
~~ i 4i~< I- wi I _I I I Us
<o I loch o~ Orh ~~ I I I I <~
°a a a I ~lao o ao ~ III I ~ a^
t a a III ~ ~~ ~ I l ~ ~
eta ,. I I ----- -fir-- ~ -
a I
g~ - (---(~ - ~~ Q JU Imo- ~
m =gg~J~ ..t U 1 I W < ~~ ~ ¢~l 1ti l ~ < ~ W
~ ~d8 W< i~ I `O ~.. i`~~i ~i W U^
n S ¢'° I I- ¢ M < p
o <c I- ~ a I I <o d
a I ------- --~ ---- -- --~
W r - __~__r __-_ ___ ~___ y
- - -
--_...-
d l I ~ I
x y a i i ~ i
3 I I 1
8F < I I o
m a V< ~ I ao %v~`
u oC r I ~ ,~
a ~ a ~ I I `G. ~/
e III II
i" F
g r-- ~--~
~ #~ii<
~ egg~3~ 4 ~ --- --- ---
tf$'z
SGY.E I' - 6'O SHEET J Cis J 9IfE73' \
PAf-~CEL MAP NO. 15948 ^QN'~
/N lN£ C/lY OF RANCHO CUGiAIONG4, COUNTY OF S4N BERNAROINO, STATE OF GIUFORNIA
BOAC A A.~ri6KW 61f TAC EAA A4YF A~ tOT IJ Q° SECIKW It, IOKTlSMI° I sDURC RMY.E 7 M£ST, •
sw BERHUx>na r>~ruuAt uw a~ crrowaw.4 /Arms As ax ,w~ 17ECtitivrlm a eaaY 4,
a/ce a a~ /aas ~aDS cr sw crorwrr
1N/EN£S EN6/N£ERIN~ lNC /UN~ 700?
BRIAN L 1NlENES P.LS NO 5750
P M NO 9020
P M 8 102/56-57
LOT 1 2 PiDff PyIP~T~ PY6E 51/t00 DACC0A5 LOT 1 1
couuDN CORNER OF LOTS 11-,! uB //9
N B9 14 31' W 665 N '~
L~
u
J
~(~
~/
l/~l
/\/-,
l/~
~ \
~~I T (I
I
I 1
E. 1 /2,
SEC.
1 4, I
I
n I
J
17 ,
N LOT 13 I LOT 1 4
N p2 GZc?Q3- ~ ll~~ I
T. 1 S ., I R. 7 W.
w
U)
~ ~
l
~ N 89'1259' W 24900' s~t3r~~1 r6 yy.~ m
I e
0
~ n 3 e, v^,I ~ In \
z
PARCEL 1
I
66 ~
I 3000
I IN 8912'59' W
,D' 1 PARCEL 2
~ I gl
=i ~
z ~
Z~
m
8 2 55 ACRES GROSS `-/ ~
S 5 7 53 ACRES GROSS
7 i6 ACRES NET I ~
8 2 24 ACRES NET I ~ I ~
s
n n ~ Ig a
I $n
II I
~
i ~
;
„I I
17
-
$i r
gig
+I , N
W
_ e 11 i I Iz 10,
y~ g~EEf DEDIGTED HEREON ~ i ~ ~ ~
SIXTH STREET DEDIGTED HEREON /`
Va.~~_ 1
-
4
I
^
tI Ii 89'1259' W 88529' ^~
I I
/ W
N
299 00
^I { ~
388 2B 7
- ~ r'~ r'Z ~ S 9roTt""' 4100 C 0
26 72 STR G CST ~ + ~
'~
R N 88 42 59' W 665 20
FD SPN(E N!D TIN NO Rff N 89'l259~ W 266108 &1515 OF BEAPoNCS
~~~ '~C '~ ~~~~
COR OF LOT 13 y B !/9 iD SPIKE AND T1N, FLUSH, IN LIEU
OF BOAT SPIKE ANO WASHER PFR P N
ND 1762, P 4 B 65/65-68 ACC A5
CENTERLINE DRFRSECRON OF LUCAS
RANCH ROAD AND SIXTH STREET
EASEMENT NOTES
1
O 17 WIDE EASEMENT FOR RNLWAY PURPOSES AND RIGHTS O 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND RIGHTS
VOR OF SOUTHERN GLIFORNUI SEE SMEEf 2 FOR BASIS Of BEARINGS
INCIDENTAL THERETO IN FAVOR OF ATCHISON TOPEKA AND INCIDEMAL THERETO IN FA
RECOftOm 10/23/1967 IN BOOK 8911,
EDISON COIAPANf
SANTA FE RNLWAY COMPANY, RECORDED 10/21/19fi5 IN
BOOK 6197, PC 640 0 R ,
PC 227, 0 R
O 33 WIDE EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY ANO ROAD PURPOSES 50 6 WIDE EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC ENERGY TPANSMISSKIN MONUMENT NOTES
SAN BERNARDINODERECORDED EIO/ B% 967 HF 800 6906 TELEPHONEI COMP NY OEF GUFORNb~A, RECORDED
O INDIGTES SET 1' 1 P TAGGED 'LS 5750', FLUSH
PC 858 O R 2/8/1968 IN BOOK 6972, PG 104 O R UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
3
O B' AND 1' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC lJT1UT1E5 ANO
V
R OF
THERN 8 11' WIDE EASEMEM FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES NJD RIGHTS
O WCIDEHTAL THERETO IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALFORNU ~ WDIGTES SET SPIKE AND WASHER STAMPED
RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO IN FA
O
SOU
CNJFORNU EDISION COMPANY A CORPORATION, RECORDED
EDISON COMPANY, RECORDED 2/3/1886 AS INSTRUMEM
t5 5750', FLUSH •
10/23/1967 IN BOOK 6911, PG 225, 0 R NO 86-033860, 0 R
~ INDIGTES uONUMEM FOUND AS NOTED
C-~ 8
RESOLUTION N0. 87-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE
UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION N0. 86-77
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes ,
to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 whi ch was adopted on the 28th day of
May, 1986 and est ablish the revised policy contained herein;
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes ,
to remove unsightly existing overhea d utility lines in
t order
ithi to promote
the City
a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environmen n
w ;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property
owners and developers of the City goal.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments,
except those contained in Section 7 and any others spec~f~cally waived by the
Planning Commission, shall be responsible f or undergrounding all existing
overhead utility lines including the removal of the related "supporting poles
adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows:
1, Lines on the project side of the street*:
• a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense.
b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that
undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short
length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded
adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users,
disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an
in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6.
c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost
of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the
opposite side or' the street.
2. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the ro~ect: The Developer
sha 1 pay a fee to the City for one-ha f the amount per Section 6.
3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with
ection above an be e ~gi e or reimbursement or pay additional fees
so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost or"
undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street.
4. Pole lines containin 66KV or lar er electrical lines: All lines shall be
un ergroun e or in- ieu ees pa> >n actor ante with section 1, Z or 3,
above, except for 66 KV or 1 arger electrical 1 i nes .
•
C-19
5. Limits of Respons~bilit~es:
a. In-lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property bu ng
developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent
streets for corner properties).
b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend
to: (1 ) the first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries
(across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a
project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an
existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner.
6. Fee Amount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per
. Section -;. a) times the unit amount as established by the City Council
based upon information suppled by the utility companies and as updated
per~od~cally as deemed necessary.
7. Exemptions: The following types of projects shall be exempt f ram this
po i cy:
a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such
as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air
conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area,
parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc.
b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of
the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's
parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less.
c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: •
reroofing, add~t~on of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment
screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc.
d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPS.
e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel.
f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility
easements with a heavy concentration of services to ad,7acent
developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of
way line of a Special Boulevard.
g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential
parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from
both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to
contribute to f uture undergrounding.
* All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel
rights-of-way, etc.
•
C -20
•
•
•
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JLNE 1987.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA
BY:
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning C anmission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN': COMMISSIONERS:
TOLSTOY
NONE
BLAKESLEY
C -21
Cap Brothers Construction
2020 Del Amo Blvd Suite 105
Torrance, CA 90501
CA LIC # 316527
To: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
From Mark Capellino
Re: DRC2003-01185 + SUBTPM 16445
Condition #3 "Undergrounding of Existing Utilities"
• Dan,
On behalf of the Change Revocable Trust, we have submitted a request to modify the
referenced condition for our project.
Enclosed please find the bids received and summery of the anticipated costs,
Related to this project. The bids and summary are separated into the following
sections (refer to highlighted SCE plans)
1- Projects actual frontage
2- Work west of project
3- Work east of project
The following lists several circumstances and provisions within resolution No. 87- 96
which we request staff and the planning commission to take into consideration.
-SCE fees are unusually expensive due to our projects proximity to
an SCE substation located at the south east canner of the
sixth +Archibald and Railroad Tracts to the east.
C -22
-All the poles and the majority of the existing overhead lines must
remain (over 66 KV)
- No other undergrounding work done on Sixth street between •
- Archibald and Hermosa
-Undergrounding work will create both traffic and electrical service
disruptions to surrounding properties
-A total of $ 46,572.00 (DRC-87.21) is only appazent money available
from the city of Rancho Cucamonga towards reimbursement
It is our request, in light of these circumstances, staff and pl~?n~ commission reconsider
condition #3, allowing this project to pay fees-in-lieu as warranted and described within
resolution No. 87-96
Our expectation of the calculation of fees-in-lieu would be:
366 LN Ft (Project Frontage) x $ 259.00
(City established costs for under grounding electrical)
Total Fee-in-Lieu $ 94,794.00
Thank you in advance for your consideration regazding this issue. •
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me
at (310) 488-4868
Sincerely
~~
Mark Capellino
•
C -23
Summary of Estimates- Notes
6`f' St. Undergrounding
Scope from station 16+34 to Station 25+27 = 893 Total
366' Section #1 "Development Frontage"- Station 19+66 to 22.89-
331" Section # 2 "Improvements west of development-station 16+34 to 19+65
196' Section #3 "Improvements east of developments- station 22+89 to 25+27
Item Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Total
So Cal Edison Fees 166.484.00 134,704.00 88.345.00 389.533.00
Conduct + Structures 88,540.00 85,500.00 86,500.00 245,540.00
Remove + Replace Misc
Public Improv.
•
-Curb -Gutter -Sidewalk 12,500.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 37,500.00
-Landscape -Parkway Repair 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 9,000.00
-Asphalt Resurfacing 24,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 34,000.00
Misc Insurance Overhead + 14,725.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 36,725.00
Supervision
Total 309,249.00 250,204.00 207,845.00 767,298.00
C -24
JUIY. LU• LUU! ! l.`t1n1Yl Inn lulrinlrn_.~~,~ ~- ~~u~ ~~~
- ~~
.~r~.~ -A7V.tili..1 ~~~fi A.i1t ~s
• 107T'[ A ~lrrgrrd e4at Frnitarra, Celifortxa 9337-033
909) s54~$8~ Fax {$09) 854-2895
CAP Brothers Constru~on
Marls Capcllino
~ Ia-48$-4$6S
FcE: 6t'' Street Under~'otxr~=~
May 23, ?007
Mark,
Tl7anl~ you fir th,.: opporhuuty to paz'tner with CAP Brothers Coz~srz'uctian. P Ake Electrical
Contractors (signatory to IBEVij) can cozuplete the work. as represented stn the drawi,ugs for a
total price of ~245,~44.00. Uelaw is the hrealcdawn far each area that waS highlighted an tY>.e
~urorlc drawings provided by you:
Station 25+27 to Station 22+s9: $$6,SOO.aO
Station 22+89 to Station 19-i~6: X88,540.00
Station 19~-b6 to Station I ~~-34: $85.SOO,aa
Note the following exceptions: Permits are not included in this price npr are railroad flagmen ar
railroad insurance. 4 grind axrd pave aver all asphalt includes a 4 foot overlay (1 fact an each
• side of a 2 foot irex~cli). A.1I traffio control is included., however starz~~+ed traffic control plans are
nat.
If khis price is acceptable, please sign an tla.e line pravidrd and reiiYm via fax to 909-$54-2$95 so
that a cont~•act can be inz~ated.
Please call me if you ha~'e any questions.
Th,anlc ydu,
4
Drew Bernard
iJndergraund Censtruction Mazxager
PAIL Lle~txical Contrators
9a~3-$54-2884 Q~fice
909-37b-9361 Cell
CAI" Bxathers Construction
C~sF~r~tn E~arlrra~x~er~
4F'"tr~. E~i- Beffen2tt ~`iGG71u$. Suite 3UJ {~"7r~ G"~. Maw.xze &+SriS (81&) {9}S3#0 Fak (816)191.3569
"~ wholly-owned SLr~sic~acy of ~uarR~t S~'~+~, Mc-"
C -25
• A.M.
escription ORTEGA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Standard Pay Items
6TH ST
EDISON CONDUIT
PI~~4SE 1
Unit Quantity Unit Price
otal Price
Trench Mamhne LF 465 $ 110.00 $ 51,150.00
Concrete Encasement YD 335 $ 85 00 $ 28,475.00
PAVING LF 465 $ 13 50 $ 6,277.50
Concrete Products EA 1 $ 6,855 00 $ 6,855.00
PULL BOX EA 1 $ 1,575.00 $ 1,575.00
Total Unit 1 $ 94,332.50
PHASE 2
Trench Mainhne LF 485 $ 108 00 $ 380.00
52
. ,
Concrete Encasement YD 350 $ 85.00 $ 29,750.00
PAVING LF 485 $ 12.50 $ 6,062.50
Concrete Products EA 1 $ 6,855 00 $ 6,855.00
Handhole Plasctic EA 1 $ 220.00 $ 220.00
Total Unit 2 $ 95,267.50
PHASE 3
Trench Mainhne LF 320 $ 120 00 $ 38,400.00
Concrete Encasement YD 500 $ 85.00 $ 42,500.00
PAVING LF 320 $ 12.50 $ 4,000.00
Concrete Products EA 1 $ 6,855 00 $ 6,855.00
Bore Railroad EA 1 $ 12,500 00 $ 12,500.00
Total Unit 3 $ 104,255.00
C-26
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON®
An POISON INTF.RNATIONAL~ Company
• Trade Umon International Inc February 12, 2007
# 1 Toplme Plaza
4651 Slate Street
Montclair, CA 91763
SUBJECT Rule 20B Underground Conversion of Distnbutron and
Telecommunications Facilities
6ei Street between Archibald and Hermosa, Rancho Cucamonga
CRE Ftle No REL 06149653
We have reviewed your request for the underground conversion of distribution and telecommunications facihtres at the
location mentioned above The estimated cost to relocate these facilities to accommodate the development of your
protect is $389,532 44
SCE acknowledges receipt of $15,000 00 as an engineering advance, therefore the balance due at this tune is
5374,532 44 Please issue your check payable to Southern Califonua Edison Company, and forward to me at the
address shown below Please identify your check with our CRE File Number Re106149653
Within a week, you will receive the Agreement for Replacement of Overhead with Underground Electrical Facilities
which addresses the underground conversion Please arrange to have the appropriate party sign m the space provided
and return the onguial to my attention
Upon receipt of your check, the signed acknowledgement set forth below, and the signed underground Agreement,
work can be scheduled to begin m approxunately 90 days
Please note that the balance due is based on estunated costs, SCE's work, however, is being performed on an actual
cost basis Therefore, at the completion of the protect, you will be sent a final invoice and be billed or refunded any
difference coveruig the actual cost of thetob Please allow approxunately one year aftertob completion for the final
invoice to be prepared Any amount owed by you to SCE at the completion of the protect shall be due no later than 30
days after receipt of the final invoice All prices quoted and/or written are applicable through May 1, 2007
• If your protect will be delayed or canceled, please notrfy me immediately at 909-944-4409 Please acknowledge your
understanding of SCE's relocation and billing process, as stated above, by signing and returning the copy of this letter
Genie Sanders
Senior Right of Way Agent
Corporate Real Estate
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SCE'S BILLING PROCESS
TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL INC.
BY Date
Signature
Tide
Print Name
cc Howard McAdoo
Cap Brothers Construction Co
2020 Del Amo Boulevard, State 105
Torrance, CA 90501
Ken Forte
Rob Bolton
Jose Ortiz
Cot poste Real Estate
9500 Cleveland Ave ,Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 ] 730
C-27
~~
t
r
• DRC2003-01185 & SUBTPM16445
Sixth Street Undergrounding
Scope of work: 6~' Street
(Station 16 and 34 to Station 25 and 27 = 893' Total)
366' Section # 1 "Development Frontage"
Station 19 & 66 to 22&89
331' Section #2 "Improvements West" of developmenn
Station 16 & 34 to 19 & 66
196' Section #3 "Improvements East" of development
Station 22 & 89 to 25 & 27
893'
•
•
Total cost for undergrounding: $767,298.00
$767,298.00 - 893' _ $859.00 lin. ft
$767,298.00 - 366' (project frontage) = $2,096.00 lin ft
$309,249.00
$250,204.00
$207,845.00
$767,298.00
City estimated lin ft cost for both sides of street is =$226.00 lin ft.
If we had to pay our fair share it would be %2 cost $113.00 lin ft.
893' x $226.00 = $201,818.00
893' x $113.00 = $100,909.00
Property purchase price was approx. $2 million
Street improvement costs w/ the undergrounding is $1 million
(Had the developer known the actual cost verses estimated street improvement costs the
project would not have moved forward.)
Project building square footage: 126,00 sq ft
Cost per sq ft to build is $.64
Additional cost per sq ft if full undergrounding is required is $.06 (10%) increase
C -28
•
Noses
^ SCE Fee per letter dated 2/12/07. 389,532.44 Includes 15,000 deposit
^ SCE contract is an estimated fee (deposit). Final costs will be determined on cost
plus bases
^ SCE fees unusually expensive due to proximity to SCE substation at 6~' and
Archibald
^ All poles and majority of the existing overhead lines must remain (over 66kv)
^ Undergrounding work will create both traffic and electrical service disruptions to
surrounding properties
^ Only $46, 572.00 available from the City of Rancho towards undergrounding
costs (DRC 87-21)
DRC2003-01185
Condition #3 The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except for
the 66kV electrical) on the project side of 6`~ Street shall be undergrounded along the
entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948, extending to the fu~st pole .
off-site (east and west}, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever
occurs first. All services crossing 6~ Street shall be under-grounded at the same time.
The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City
adopted cost for under-grounding from future development (redevelopment} as it occurs
on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement
agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all
rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
•
C-29
r~
Total Costs/Comparisons
Costs to Underground Project Frontage $309,.249.00
Averages 844.94 per LN FT
Costs to Underground outside of project boundaries $458,049.00
• Normal anticipated costs to Underground Utilities 226.00 per LN FT (Amount City uses
for Bonding/Project Valuation)
If project is required to perform full Undergrounding (767,298.00) The effective cost per
foot = 767,298.00 divided by 366 =2096.44 per foot.
L
C -30
• Request to modify Engineering condition #3 for DRC2003-01185 & SUBTPM 16445
regarding the undergrounding of utility lines along Sixth Street.
Thank you for the opportunity to address this issue with you. This project was approved
in 2005 and is substantially complete. In the process of completing the project, the
compliance with Engineering condition #3 became such a challenge that we have spent
months trying to determine the best course to take in fulfilling the requirements of the
condition. The owner has determined that he would like to re-approach the Planning
Commission and seek a modification to the condition. The owner is fully aware of the
Planning Commission's policy and desire to create a better business environment for
successful businesses. We are not coming with a recommended change but would like to
present our case and look at options that would still maintain the goal of the
undergrounding policy but would consider the specifics of this project.
The Engineerig condition that we would like to have amended is:
DRC2003-01185
Condition #3 T'he existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except
for the 6bkV electrical) on the project side of 60' Street shall be undergrounded
along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948, extending to
the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or
occupancy, whichever occurs frsk All services crossing 6`h Street shall be under-
. grounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement
to recover one-half the City adopted cost for under-grounding from future
development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the
developer fails to submit far said reimbarsement agreement within 6 months of the
public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to
reimbursement shall terminate.
The scope of undergrounding work along 6`t' Street as conditioned is a distance of 893
feet.
For the purpose of this review we have divided the frontage in three sections:
366' Section #1 "Development Frontage"
Station 19 & 66 to 22&.89 $309,249.00
331' Section #2 "Improvements West" of development
Station 16 & 34 to 19 & 66 $250,204.00
196' Section #3 "Improvements East" of development
Station 22 & 89 to 25 & 27 $207,845.00
893'
$767,298.00
C -31
•
Total estimated cost for undergrounding is $767,298.00 or $859.00 lin. ft. The owner has
gone out twice to seek proposals that would Lower that amount. The amount noted above
is the lowest bid to date received. The City's estimated Lin ft cost for both sides of street
is $226.00 a lin ft. This is a difference of $633.00 a foot.
If we were simply required to pay our fair shaze for undergrounding and not actually
underground the lines at this time we might be looking at one of three options:
1) pay for the entire 893 feet x $226.00 a foot for a total of $201,818.00;
2) pay for the entire 893 feet x $113.00 a foot because we would only pay for our side
of the street for a total of $100,909.00; or
3) pay for only the 366 feet of project frontage at $113.00 for a total of $41,358.00.
The actual 6`}' Street project frontage is only 366 feet. The remaining street frontage
requiring undergrounding is 493 feet. The 493 feet of frontage is on parcels east and west
of the project site.
We would like the opportunity to present these issues and others that would help the ,
Commission understand the impact of condition #3 to this project. We look forward to
meeting with you.
C -32
•
Total Costs/Comparisons
Costs to Underground Project Frontage $309,.249.00
Averages 844.94 per LN FT
Costs to Underground outside of project boundaries $458,049.00
• Normal anticipated costs to Underground Utilities 226.00 per LN FT (Amount City uses
for Bonding/Project Valuation)
If project is required to perform full Undergrounding (767,298.00) The effective cost per
foot = 767,298.00 divided by 366 =2096.44 per foot.
C-33
RESOLUTION N0.05-24
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW DRC2003-01185, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP 11 INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING 126,843 SQUARE FEET
ON 7.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 5), LOCATED AT 9850 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-211-19.
A. Recitals.
1. Mark Capellino, on behalf of Cap Brothers Construction, filed an application for approval
of Development Review DRC2003-01185, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On March 23, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a
meeting to consider the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on March 23, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the development of 11 office/warehouse buildings with a
combined floor area of 126,843 square feet on a property of 316,859 square feet (7.27 acres); and
b. This application is in conjunction with the subdivision of the subject parcel into
11 parcels (related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445). One building will be constructed on
each individual parcel; and
c. The properties to the south, east, and west of the subject site are fully improved
with industrial development, while the properties to the north are partially improved with industrial
development (the remainder are vacant); and
d. The subject properly has a street frontage along 6th Street of 370 feet, overall width
of 665.41 feet and overall depth of 615.86 feet; and
e. The subject site is vacant; and
f. Vegetation on the subject site is limited to low grasses and a grouping of eight trees
w at the south side of the site; and
C -34
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 2
g. One point of primary and one point of emergency access into the site will be
provided from 6th Street; and
h. Adjacent, and parallel to, the east property line is a north-south railroad line; and
i. Consistent with the Rail Service Standards outlined in Section 17.30.040.F, a
portion of the subject site with the dimensions of 25 feet wide by 615.86 feet long immediately
adjacent, and parallel to, the existing railroad easement shall be unencumbered with structures,
paving, and outdoor storage or similar uses, and Buildings 1, 3, and 5, as they are the closest to the
rail line will incorporate knock-out panels on their east elevations; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby
specifically finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and
development Code; and
b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
•
c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
tie detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
Califomia environmental QualityAct (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
C-35
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24
DRC2003-01 1 85 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
• Page 3
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin4 Department
1) Approval is for the construction of 11 buildings with a combined floor
area of 126,843 square feet.
2) Outdoor eating areas shall have an overhead, decorative trellis shade
structure, tables, chairs/benches, and trash receptacles.
3) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light
fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order
to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The
• maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from
the finished surface is 25 feet.
4) All roof- and ground-mounted equipment shall be completely screened
from view from surrounding properties and the public right-of-way.
Screening shall be architecturally compatible with the proposed
building. The location of Southern Califomia Edison transformer(s)
shall be shown on the plans submitted for Building and Safety plan
check.
5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any of the
buildings elevations. All downspouts shall be routed through the
interior of the building.
6) The maximum height of any wall or fence in this development district is
8 feet. Chain link fencing is not permitted; perimeter walls/fences shall
be constructed of wrought iron, concrete block, tilt-up concrete panels,
or equivalent as approved by the City Planner. Where walls/fences are
placed above retaining walls, the calculated height of the overall
wall/fence combination shall not exceed 8 feet.
7) A minimum of 228 parking stalls shall be provided for the overall site.
8) Parking stalls shall have a minimum width of 9 feet and a minimum
depth of 18 feet (1-foot ovefiang into landscaped areas is permitted).
Truck trailer parking stalls shall have a minimum width of 14 feet and
minimum depth of 50 feet.
C-36
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 4
9) All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored
within the building or storage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet
of a street frontage shall be screened. All screens and/or enclosures
are subject to City Planner approval.
10) The portion of the property, with dimensions of about 25 feet wide by
615 feet long, that is reserved for a potential rail spur that is located
along, and parallel to, the east property line and directly adjacent to the
east side of Buildings 1, 3, 5, and 7 shall be landscaped with ground
cover, and an appropriate irrigation system shall be installed. In
addition, a grouping of trees (minimum 36-inch box) and shrubs shall
be planted in the landscaped area adjacent to Building 1 and behind
the proposed screen wall that will be located at the southeast comer of
Building 1. The use of this potential rail spur area for vehicle access,
truck loading/unloading, materials storage, vehicle parking, oranytype
of similar activity is not permitted.
11) The employees' outdoor eating area immediately in front of Buildings 7
and 9 shall incorporate benches and creative landscaping.
•
12) Decorative paving shall be provided at the primary entrance to the site,
behind the public right-of-way. The decoratively paved area shall have
a minimum depth of 35 feet and width equal to that of the driveway.
13) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 is hereby approved with the
condition that preservation of the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan
Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified in the
arborist report as trees #1 and #2, respectively, are relocated to
suitable locations on-site. The new locations of these trees shall be
shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and
approval.
14) Landscaping provided shall be consistent with the standards described
in Section 17.30.040.E of the Development Code. Detailed Landscape
and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted, at the time of plan check, to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The Detailed
Landscape and Irrigation Plans must be approved by the City Planner
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
15) All landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy.
16) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the
project's Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's).
Enaineering Department
1) Full frontage improvements shall be installed at the local industrial •
width (curb face 22 feet from centerline of street, in-line with existing
curb face on Parcel 1, PM15948) including asphalt pavement to
C-37
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01 1 85 -MARK CAPELLINO
• March 23, 2005
Page 5
centerline of street, curb and gutter, drive approach, curvilinear
sidewalk, street trees, three (3) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights and
traffic signing and striping.
a) Curvilinear sidewalk and street trees shall be installed to
accommodate the ultimate width of 6th Street (curb face 32 feet
measured from centerline).
b) Drive approach to be per City Standard No.101, Type C and be a
minimum of 35 feet wide. Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the
drive approach at the 0" curb face (non-contiguous sidewalk).
c) Main north/south driveway shall align with the existing driveway
on the south side of 6th Street. Centerline offset between the
proposed driveway and the existing driveway across the street
shall not exceed 10 feet.
2) Eventually, 6th Street will be widened to a secondary arterial. While it
may be impractical to install these improvements at this width now,
development will be required to:
a) Design on-site improvements to accommodate the ultimate width
• of 6th Street (curb 32-feet from centerline). Orient on-site
improvements to work with both the interim and ultimate street
improvements.
b) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1/2-foot
behind the ultimate right-of-way (44 feet measured from the
centerline of 6th Street and dedicated on Parcel Map 15948)
along the whole street frontage.
3) The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except
for the 66kV electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be
undergrounded along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and
2 of PM15948, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior
to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs
first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be under-grounded at the
same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover one-half the City adopted cost for under-grounding from future
development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the
street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement
agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted
by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
4) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of
surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Drainage
from the north shall be collected and conveyed in PCC drainage
devices, around proposed buildings to on-site facilities, eventually
discharging onto 6th Street.
C -38
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 6
5) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the
issuance of Grading Permits. Public Improvement Plans shall be
100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an
improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to
Building Permit issuance.
6) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permit, and identify
applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan.
Also, have appropriate WQMP 'TEMPLATE" Attachments regarding
responsible person(s) for maintenance and operations of the BMP's
recorded with the County of San Bernardino, and provide copy of
recorded document to the Engineering Department priorto issuance of
Grading Permits.
7) Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in
the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs).
8) Where applicable, obtain and provide off-site entry rights to grade on
adjacent properties, including the railroad easement(s).
•
9) Provide written confirmation from railroad company regarding any •
proposed grading adjacent to their easement along existing spur lines;
reference Grading Plan Submittal -Sections C, D and E.
10) Decorative paving on-site shall not encroach onto the ultimate
right-of--way for 6th Street.
Environmental Mitigation
Aesthetics
1) Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination
is confined within the project site. Glare shall be minimized by shielding,
diffusers, or use of indirect lighting. A Photometric Plan shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval.
Air Quality
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records
shall be available at the construction site for City verification.
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit
construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and •
projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be
utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for
C-39
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 7
the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the Southern California Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards
noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied
either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1108.
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and
403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering.
• Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
• Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time.
• Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed
• excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
• Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
• Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
• Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if
silt is carried overto adjacent public thoroughfares oroccurs as a
result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year
of construction.
• Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
• Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks
or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board
[RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with
SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions.
• 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
C -40
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 8
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use.
10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that
trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of
10 minutes).
11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential
parking for vanpools.
12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees
shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in
conspicuous areas.
13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees
shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the
Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible.
•
Biological Resources
1) The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan •
Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as
trees #1 and #2, respectively, on the site plan submitted with the
Arborist Report, to suitable locations on-site. The new location of
these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the
City for review and approval.
Cultural Resources
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to
monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect
or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from
demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for
the City to establish its archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of
archaeological sites within new developments, using their special
qualities as a theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological
heritage.
• Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of
approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,
important, and unique prehistoric resources, following
appropriate CEQA guidelines.
C -41
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
• Page 9
Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting
the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources
within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report
with original illustrations to the San Bemardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving.
2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey
of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings
that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further
mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be
appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program
must include, but not be limited to, the following measures:
Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow
the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to
the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
• Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,
divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has
completed salvage. If construction personnel make the
discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert
construction and notify the monitor of the find.
• Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer
collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino
County Museum.
Geology and Soils
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions,
in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule
established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time
of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such
episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions.
C -42
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01 1 85 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005 .
Page 10
Hydrology and Water Quality
1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated
into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that maybe
used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch
drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions,
runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the
City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan
(V1/QMP), including a project description and identifying Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce
pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent
practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural
measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and
Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June
2004.
3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to
the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining
coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained
"(i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General
Construction Permit.
4) Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a
regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup
of spills and broken containers.
5) Below grade loading docks for warehouse/distribution centers of fresh
food items shall drain through water quality inlets, or to an engineered
system, or an equally effective alternative.
6) Building and grounds maintenance includes care of landscaped areas
around the facility, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the
cleaning of the storm drainage system.
7) Outdoor storage of items primarily used by the tenant shall be
discouraged. In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the
materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for
storage.
8) Outdoor storage of materials for rehabilitation, remodeling, and
improvements shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work .
is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from
drainage structures, and on a paved surface. The areas shall be
isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic
C -43
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24
DRC2003-01 1 85 -MARK CAPELLINO
• March 23, 2005
Page 11
sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from
the area. Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and
tools shall be kept in a covered area. Larger materials such as lumber
shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy
plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy
winds.
9) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The exterior of the
containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean
of debris. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person
responsible for the maintenance of the site. Spills shall be cleaned
immediately and shall be done with the appropriate cleaning materials.
All drainage from the building and pavement shall be diverted away
from the trash container area. Building roof drains shall be connected
to the underground storm drain system or adjoining pavement drains
located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas
shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash.
Noise
1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of
• 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday.
2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at
the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly
noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section
17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building
Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building
Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above
standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building
Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction
actwities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with
above noise standards or halted.
3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in
the first phase.
4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used
for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the
construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation
plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent
• feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive
land uses or residential dwellings.
C -44
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-24
DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO
March 23, 2005
Page 12
6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Larry Niel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit
•
AYES' COMMISSIONERS. FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART •
NOES. COMMISSIONERS' NONE
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS MACIAS
•
C-45
•
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements•
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported
• 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department
Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address•
City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency
Planning Department
• 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
C-46
Mitigation Monitoring Program
DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible Ctty department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may apse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
•
7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten
notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall
require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City.
These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to
monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time
9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits
C-47
•
a
J
Q
Z
Y
W
2
U
Z
O
Z
a
f-
G
N
L
o
0 0
L N
m
U .c
i
++ ~
R
V
.Q ~
Q ~
a o
,~
W
r
a
H
m
C ~
~N
~ Y
r
O
~~ R
Q
z° a
W
U N
Q~ (~
a
~r
N
`f ~ ~
N ~'
a
; N
~ ,
~.'
~, ~~r~~
S
•
r
~:".
~
~
~
~ a a U a
ro ~ ro ro (~
a ~~- Q a Q
• 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f
~
~ - ~ ~ ~
~.
~'
F m .:~:: U U U
• ,~ ~.
. ;~
~~ ~
=E`
~
• W
\
1 ^
LL /~
LL ^
LL LL
U _ U U U
r
' O N "d
L ~~
~ ~O ~ C (n to ~
oro-o
oc O ?~ N L N
Q~~;o~~E~ro a `"
mT o
G'».i., c
C C~ to ~ _
~~ V O~ U _
O H O RS N O O (
/) ~ m ~
X r c
~ ~ _ C~ L ro~ O
t ,
? C= +L+ ~ -O OU O~ O N E
~
' O O L
7
~ ~ O m N
o .., N
~ Q C C U ~
o O O O O
~ C E U .D O ~ "-' ~Q
m
'- ~ ~
.~~ ... a~
~~~~
r co
roc
~ ~E~~ c-o
.Y~°-~~µ-~~~ O
oar
C
t:
,~~ O Q~ t
`~ m~ ~~ c o
a N U N O S c
C N y V
a
~ O Q N
E
-
' ~ ro ~
E a~~-o c a
~~ E ~ o U
o
~~~ ~ "= "O i O_ ro C O O O
O
- U L C ~ -_ O "'' O N ~~ ro Q
~ rn ~ ~ ro
~
~ ,. ~
~ (n
c~ - >, ro ~ ro O_ ro C N O L
>, - L ~
O ~ N ~
y ~
~ ' O
7 C~ O ro
,-
~
~
~ U t
n N ~«-
ro
oy ro
~
C N
~ O ro 7
~':
"~''. X >~ p~ r, rO
Q U
E L O O ~
O c
`?
p ro 0 ~ O c (n ~ -p L to
~ c roQ m a' ro °>N ~ c c.~ U o-~ E c c
~'} ~. '.
~
t (~ N N L
"a CO E ~ O N ~ `. ~ O ~
~ ~ O ~ 7 ~ ro C ~ C N fn O („) ~ C
~
tq O ~ OU O ~ ~ N "O cC
~ ~ rop O
k
y5
k
k'9 Re C ~
c ~ O ro
"U~ ^
n
~
(n U U '~ L L
LL Q~ U
'
(~'
' ~ro
~~
c E
' ,^
~
': U
ro(u~
L ~
{
ro"v~oErooc"~
ro
L ~U.o°
c c E
• ~,.` C
°
~
roEro ~
-
r
c~
_' ~c ~ c o
to C O c~ i ;~.n~ U cam-
~
U
c~` O ~ Q c
co c
~ E ro 0
~;
> c~ _A
w- v
-EU ~
~ c ,~,
."Q,~
~ ~
c ~ E ro ~
O~v~o-E- O
cn o y i4 y >, ..- ~
~n~~roCtn
L- Q ~. cn >
o c
~
o~ia~-oL
C O ,
"~'"~
~
' .~
`-'aE~a~~a~ Q
~.~°o~Lm`°om
~~ U ~
U ~
-~ cam
Q
a
J~ cn d
' Q O a1 O Q~ >
AA N O
~~ O_ - L
fl-
0
T
V -46
• • i
N N N N N N ~Y d' ~}' ~ ~
•
•
'
a a a a a a Q Q Q Q Q
~ y ~ N N ~ y
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
c
a a a a s a n c
0 c
0
~ c
o
O O O
~ O
~ O
~ O
~ O
~ U
O U
O~ _
U
O
m
`' U
D7 L
N
>
O N
>
O N
>
O N
>
O N
>
O N
>
O N
> ~
C~ C
C C 1
+
C ~
C C C
C C
~
~
~
~
~
Q O
~ O O
~ U O O
D U O O
D U O O
D U
m U U U U U U U U U U
. .
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
~ m m
~ p -
L ~ a~
~ o o c -o
~ -o cv ~ o
~ - .c
~ w ~ ro
O C~ O
-O O O to
C N O ~
~ C O L C`
.
~ O~ ro ~
o O L
to O ~n 0~ ct
c
~ Q
i
U o ~
~
~
O~ c a~
O ~ cn
~
O aro a~
L L >+ ~
~~ c
O ~ L o~~ a~
p O i~
uJ O
~ ~ U
~
° >,
- o O~
E _N
ro ~ ~ ~
~
o ° C ro
3a O
a L~ O~
o~
ro „
~, ~ U ~ ~,~
>., ~
OU
L
~ ~ N
ro
L
.O ro
..~ ro~ •~
L CUU
ro m
L ~~ d
i Q U N U O .
-~
~ O O O O~ C O C O C O~ m U
~ >,
E ~ ~ N ro > ~
p ~. ~-' ~ O ~ d U Cn
O. O
U ro C O O fn ~
O N E~ c
U (~ !
N
~
> -p d O ~ to U' ~_
U
Ooh L°C ° c m . °'~ U
ro
°
- ~`- ~o /
/~
~>,~ m
V O V) -d ~ a~
>~ ro C x E
O O ro~
a
O
L C o
N 7 - >, -O -O U
X T
• Q1 •- ~ N
C Q > O
U 3 O p N
~ L _
O
cpn U
O ro !n L
C i 7 0
"a ro U Q ro m p
~ C_ ~ ~ ro
N a "O a `- c~
N N~ ~
O O
c
E ~
Q~p-
~~
cro
j
ro
Q>
o
y~
a~~
Q- O V
°-
O O O 'Op
U
°-'O c~
oroo
E N
>> _
_
ro 0 f~ O
EL U
~~
N 50 ~
~ C o a,
~ C ~
~ ~ c
O ro
?> ~L ~
~ ~y o m~v E o Qo U
~
E~ ~
O~ ?~
c
o
O -p
ca~
>'
fl- O
C fn
-oo
U V V1
roxa
'> O'
o mop y 0 N>
~ ~«_. O
ac a N~
ro N 7
~ m _C ~~
p ro
E N ro C C
L v 0
cUN
LO c
°- ro o _
"-~ vi m ro~ a~ o ~ L °~~ ~ ro o mm
m m
roY
E _
~ m >,c
v,
U ~
O N N ~
ro L L
O ~o ro
-o
O O O
a
N ro N ~,ULE~
m 7
°' pro
C a~ _U
C O N ~~=°-
y ro~ to
~cn
c c o
`"~ ~ °'
m o m
> N ~
ro ro ~ w
aY O~ ~
°-O ~ m c
`-
ro~ ° `~ ro ~d
~'~¢ robes
c
~ o~~ ~!'
~' cQ E
.
a ~
O m
O ~ ~
~~ CC ~ ~ ~ ro .c
(n N ~ ~ (~ O (n LL-. F- ~ (n ~ Cn ~
~ ~
~ N N ~ O
= O o
ro
_
Q C U
_
- 7 U
Q~ C
^
^
^
^
^
^
^ .
^ O 'O (b
~lA~ ~..
dQ
•
~ •
O
N
•
L
,~~
. .
`;;
"
~
~i'
v
C~
~'
c~
N
c~
N
co
C~ s:, x ~
~~;~ ,
c~
~ N
~~
~~-
,k
iE1.
~ ~ -
• ?'
s
. ,
~
~ti';
~,
°
Q a s Q a o o ~ a
,.
;4
C C C C C C
~ ~
~ C
c~ c~ ro ~ c~ c~ <
,
~ c~
o a ~ a a a a ~ n
U O O O O O O O
~ i
C N J N N N O O
. O
O O O O O O O N ~,,
e~.. .
~ ._
'_`,`~A
• U U U U U U U O
~~~
,,
~,
m m m m U '~" U
U U <:
'~ O O cII c~ Y C O N O _c 0
0 4 ~0
0
O
ciS C
N
~ 3
~ ~
~
p CCS 0
p L ~ 0~
~~
7 ~ > 'C
J
`
,
.
~ ~ ~
O ~
~ ~
to p
~
L .~
~ ~ ~
~ J ~ ~ p ~
~ O ~
O O
U U~ B O O ~ ~ (0 N~ y~ U O .t ~ N O C
~> j
N~
N C
y m
~
~~ c~
H O C _
C~ U N O~ a
L
N 3
~
~
~ ~
,. .
~ Q Q
~ C ~ C
~ O
~ ~ ~
~ _
0 ~ ~ ~
~ r
'1 ~ ?
~
> - p ~ ~ O O
' U N O U d
0 ~ ~ `
_r ~ O
L ~ N t~
•~ "
~ c~ L
o ~ ~ a L
L..
o?~ ~ N C ~ to
o O ~ O U C O
~ O >
O c~ ~
LOCO
a0
a... La
~ ~U ~~
~
o ~o ~~
~Q.Q ~
~~ ~
-ate ~~~ L(~a
3HJ
c~ a~
~
> ~~
° roS~ o
b
~ ifl- ocn
o
o
~ o~~
O_
~~
~-
,
~ °~ ~~E ,._.
a~ mc~ n a~~
ro ~~ai~~
N O' ~ C
~ O
C a O ~ y N ~ O ~_ ~ ~ C~ >, ~
` O O "O E ~ O
__ t
L N C~ N
~~ ~ 6
C C O O
OU Y X O
U~ O t6 N
U N N O L y~
U~~ (~ ', w' ~~
~.~" y _~ N L C C
~ E~ ~ O~
O
C~ L~
(n E
~ C Q
° O 'p O
~ Q U O
O -p Y
C i 'D ~ C
C -p 'a to O C
C N ~0 0 ,
~ _
L~ C ~ O>
~ O C C L N
~
O
- N
N - ~ ~ m ~ C N cti
Q ca ~ O c~ O N cn ~ -
x
, - -O O O cn ~
~
~ ~
°
C
C = y_
L O ++ C L
C O Q ~ N
L+ O ~
L (~ O O O
~ Q VI ~ O U Q)
C d y l
~
~s.:.
` ~
- a c0 ~ O
U LL O O p-
ti
(SS m L n-
~ >
C
O U -
U O 3 ~
(n m v
7 C cA
!/> ~
C
to ~ Y
C
7
N ~ m C ,
7 0
O ,.
(d ^
;Ur , ~_
d C ~ N (~
(~ ~
N L U
U N
t~ U O
O
U C ` rn -O C "O O
'D ~
O 0 _
"O O
C _
'D ~ X,
C ~,,C~"~.
' _
d
~ U N N Q~ O
O N~ O U ?r C E O C ~~ ~ L O Ou
,< x C~ CO N L
U ~ c0 I- c0 F- U U Q ~ ~ Q Q Q ~ ~ Q ~ O ~ m `
.,. I--' d. O cn ; ~
c~
C -50
r~ r~ i
f7
~ z<
§
• ~~~.'.`
l,
i
~
M
~
7
~'
~
~
, a c cj cj C7
rx+; ~Yi.,..
,
''~
?~a t
t~''^
~
;
~ %
~: '_ ~.~
u
'' ~' °
~~
;~ ~~. a a a a a
° ° ° ° °
a n. a a a
~ ~
0
0
0
0
0
r,~ >
a~ >
m >
m >
m >
m
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
=~u
U U U U U
~,
~~
:
~~,
O O O O
t n_ a a d ~
U U U U U
°r4m~
~~'-~ ~ = c L N
O ?~ 0 0 .~ ~ c cn
O O '= m cC
N ~
t~ a -- N Q
C O O O -o -- s ~,
O C~~ C~
_
0
=
C U y ~ ~n
N C O
E~~ w 3
~~~ O~
', 7 N 0
~ aL
a~ o ~- o o h m,~ -
.n c ° ~ a°U
E L a~U
o E
a~~ ~ ~ a
~;.~;, O~ U o ~ c c E o ~ °
a~ ~ a E ~ °-a -o
;~,;~ ;; ~
m m `o ~ ~' o
° o
'~ o-
~
-moo o °
°~ ~ ~_ ro o
''''' oo~U ~~~ o~'~ ro comma om3aoo
~~•~'
~".,,~r;, ~ °'E ~~U
U ~ ~U N "
~ RS m
a
U ~ `°
~~ O~ ~ m Em c
E m O C m
~~ o m O
Esc
o ~ °-~°
w~ o ~
L m _
.n a~ ac
° E ~ ~'~ ° coU
m o o m~
'
' _
O m U m "~ ~ O
i a ~ `- a N m~ 0 ~ C~ Y m C
,
;
' c
~°L OC
°~~~
°'~'r
~~
E c"- _
cnc ~Oio
O U
~ O
s,~i,,:
` `~ fl.. .-. ~
O U a y m 7
O~ (~ ~~
~ O O D1 i
C m O O .~ L
o R3 O O U C
coc
c~
.,~n ~m~m U EEo> cop a ~ ma
,o io
;~ - o o~ m o m E~ ago m vi ~ ~ ~ mco ~ ~ ~ ono ~ ~
o
o- =a~mco~':
~
_ `m oo~
_
E o °°o ~a~
m o E o°
~ o vi SEE~m
~ ~_ o
~~ m ~. a m j ° ~ o> ~ ~ ~ aoi
~ ~ co L
~ o a o ° o
m y p o ~ m a~i a~i ~ j - o
~
m
~~ . ~ ~ ~ O O _
U ~ O ~ _o
cn n' O E to s ,r ~ _
a a U .~ m _
~ ~
~- ~ Q c~ C ~ ~
Y~
',.~ O 7 C~ N cm0
co o ~ > yL C~ -+ `U-
w w ~ co O O O O
U Sam ? ~
~ co ~ ~~~~
d v m ao> ~ ~ O~ N~ i U
n. -o ac`o oQ c`o
~ C ~ U ~ ~
',U~ ~m~coaco .
•
rn •
O
'~t
•
-51
•
•
~~
4 ~ ~"fi
i
h ~.
~.
~~ =s S
~ ~ _
rW°
• "~
&~,
° ° `~
a
' a a o : ~~ Q Q Q
0 0 0 .~„
Q
d
d 0
d
~q. --
N O ~ O '._ C C C
O O O O U U V
O
> O
> _N
> O
>
.°
- ~
C N
C ~
`
C ~
i
N
~
N
~
N
~
O
~
`~~.`
= O
C
D U
= O
- C
D U
C O
C
D U
tyw
• U
m m m ~ U U U
,~,
"~~'~ ,
~:, W w
U U
m m
U U U U m
o-~cn~°~~ _°c~o a_°ia`~i°~~ oc~>, ~m.~ ca ~„~ ~cn
0 o-a aa~
U O > ~ «f
~ b o o?
.~ U
O c -o o ~'~
N p) O
N itS ~
L o 0
O ~ C o co
L '~ "a ~- ~ o
OU ~ O) O a~
~
~
~ ~ O ~ ~n
a
Q
- p
c~
~ _
C N .p 'p
D U ~
ci3
~ O t0 ~ ~ ,- C ~
Y _
'p ~
O
~ L ~
f ~
o
Cd _ C O ~~ N
O L C
'" _ N p
N L
i L E O ~ Y O
Q i
U D U
L fC
~ O U C
Q
" ~ a
~ a~ ~.-.`o-~
O .n
c °
O ca ~ o~ ~ o
C ~ a~
"p m ~
~ ~
c
d a
i
~ °a
~ '~ ~ o
N
CO i p) »-~ O
"O N C
c
cL= m c O E
,~
E~ ~ O- C
(~ 'p O Y
o
ca O O
c ~ _,
~ T ~; ~?
Q
~ ~ ,
O
cn N
U m d
to to
°~ m
o ~
c U
in o N c . ~ o
E
s
ci3 '-' C_ ~
O~
L O m a~
O~ ~ m
~
~
U
O ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ C _
O ~ 7 ~ C
N
N ~ ~ Q U ~ C O.
c~ ~ O
~
', ~ o
O- ~ .a ~ i
O N O cC ~
O
~ V)
~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ to ~
O c0 RS O ~
a y ~ C ~ O ~ F- , v5 ~ ~ Q' O
~ N _~ ~ >, O N c
O~
O O > r> O
C
? ~ O O~
U
O " to "O 7~ O C
"
~
U 0 7 ro L
»~-
U C O
, - c N U -p O ro 'a 7
ctS O Q cU
O
~
O_ >~ N 'C ~ ~ ~ ~ O
L
C Q cTf O
i
O
-p ~ L Sri ~ ? .
O
O j ; ~.
.,
'C. - L ~ p
tq ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ O)
O. O cti C O N O p
p X ^=
'
~ ~n~c o °~ ~
~U ~ o~ o>>o- m
a~
oc
~c.~.
~~~o _oa~ ~
Qa~iE~ UC~ c
c~i`oa~~-`o~° a
cqU°~ ; ~,
`o';~ ~n
n?,d c
c~wHN N
-aa~i~
~~ ~ ° o Q o o - ° .
~ ~ U o ~ ~ c
°
~ c~6 a~ o
fl
Q ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ' ,C3 ~~ , I- ~ -a cn IL v
i a
i ~ ° i' .....
C3 v
O
V •5L
•
a~~~ ~" kii N
~
Fe eP N N
iy9 ~4
v
~
~
ry
f
ltl
1
~ ~ f
S.rr.; , ,~
"dF3 ~ hi"
y M
•
r
?rz ,
~~
~
Q
~"ad a a a
a,w~ ~w s r
~s
. N N y
c c c
_ , ,
F ca m m
~
• p p d O_ O_
• U 7 0 O O
•
~
`
' N ~ N
r
~ +
~
~j
, O O O
~ U kip ,
~~
R' ~ ~ Q'
_ ~
(!~ i'
~
• ~~
I
4
~
_
• ~ rr~ "J
~f, o 0 0
•
~~x
~ m m m
v ?
~~
~~
0
m
C O ~
O U O
D ~ `o
~~,E
QU' p o
U ~
0
~ U =
L
~ C
N ~- ~
~ - ~
O ~p `
ap o
~~ ~
~~
N ~ C CO
c~a m ~ ~
.n
in=~E
- (0 O O
o L ~ o
to y .~
~m~a
~ ~ ~ ~
U~ tv ~
w
U
w
U
W O U O~ C ~C N .~
L~ O V C O O C~
y O y X •
~?~ a~ ~ o'°~ m
c~mm~~ ~'S0
V „_, Q~ ~- 7 E U -O
O_ O C C O=~~ p 0
~m~E~XCyi~aciN
O p U O U O L L O
L`n.c~~ .~..E
.~ E~,•3o~
O.~ C O
E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ C
> N O - to O ~
~Ovm NFL O~ O
5 ~ c ago E N o~ E
~ ~c~ c~ ~d N ~ m
~ W d~ N >'~ ~ c c
C C O N~ fq O V
o~ a~ m o ~ m E 0
U V d -p ~_ ~ L E O C
.Lp. ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ N ~ ~
c a~ _
y O~ O w ~~ U O O
O >, ~. in N U y y U
~E~~d ~z
0= 3~ m ~ O o O
Q. (n~~ O_Cw
w
U
L O N C O~
cn L E ~p U N
ai3c~~~
C N O w ~
O O .. 7 N C
.x cv
o am o ` vi
~ o ~ ~° .n a
~~ ~ ~~ a~
C "" L C N (D
C C (9 p ~ ~
°- °~ E ~ c~ cn
~ O t0 = L ~
n.~Lr= o
V O ~-. C O ~
~ L N y V p
O C ~ O.
c o w ~ N
~U C f9 L O ~
O C "'' O
~ ~ ~ O ~ C
O O _O C
to ~ ~ ~ U y
~~~c c
~~af°~~
j C Q 0 U~ y
b
fn ~ W ~ a v .n
C •53
C~p= (~(nL f0 ~ ~(n
C.~O Ow...L ~,,•, W
aC cDa O U~Lz
m ~ZZv N o N O
C N _• 'D w
EO`~`'wo~`m
~ O N O ~
oa.~c~a~aNj
O) O ~ fn ~- (0 O
C Z O p O U^. N
O O~ C f0 m p 0 O)
N ` (gyp O ?> O ~ t~D
~.
O~> c E c ~Z o
ma~c°~ ~ o~j"c ~ E
vw mw~ a °~' ~ °a-
O) ~' C N O~ •f0 U D C
oV ~ °'~ o~„_ ai o
UL. O V b Gyi O ~ ~ ~
cow rn c ~ ~ - c in
~= 3 ~ o~~ N w c
E >,~,U ~~ o~U
~' o ~m ~L.c o m`
. c ... ~ w c
O ~p U- O y y
C L O O .r •- O
a N °n.C~cn~D ~C7
0
•
•
•
~J
. .
C
C
v v
I~ N 1~ N N
' U a Q a a
y ~
f~ (~
"O
Q
'D
~ C
O
~ O ~ O
U
C
>
C
~ C ~
C
Q ~ Q ~ ~ U
•
•
W m W m m
~ ~
f1] CD
~ W ~ ~ ~
U U U U U
>+ "d C
N C O C '- ?,
O~- C~
O C~ O U
C Cn CC C C O N N O N L 'O O
C- Q LT .Q c~ ~~ p U C L
,O (0 O
~- Q)
O
L = ca O
~~ D- ~ Y O
~ U C ~ ~
~ O RS ~ ~ co -_ L c0 ~ O ~ co =
~ O O C~ U C E y
(
'p In ~
C ~ L O U _a fn C ~ ~
= U C~~ 7
m~ ~o~ °o~
' O ~ L ~ENvio a~~
C ~ O ~ ~ O a C ~ ~ 'p Y ~ ~ L .fl ~ (~ 7 O ~ CO ~ ~ ~'p
ac~ip°_ ~caEi c~~
- ~o-n ~
- L-~ros~`~roE~~ai~
ro oo
~ .c~.r ~_ v~~ a~
o
c m~ ~ ~- ro
v ~ ~ ° iJ
°
'~~ ~ °~ E
~
O~ 6
O L N v
C~ ~
> cv ~ v
~
int
,~
O 't C~ ~ C N cSS cd
c c
LO
Q d~
O` U N~
y In N ~ O L
C
,r ~ N C~
O~ .
-
N O ~ p O C "' (~ O ,~ d 0
O E O ~ U~~ Q `
>'
~ ~ ~
~ ~ o~ L
E~-o Q.
~'~ E-a C
~ N
E > ~ ~ ~ o pjOC via ~ ~ °
_
~~
~ o .. c
-o _ ° c c
c ~ E c
m~ o °~~ ~ E E~ o~
° ~ .c
B E C O (~ O C
~ "
N ~ E "" Ci$ (~
O L C D O L =~
O
E .C ~ _
"a ~ O> (
C
~ y 0 -
O p) 'D 'O
~ O N _
N N L C ~ c0 N U ~ C
~ ~ to U
O U
cti (p - ~
O ~~ ~ N O C _
~ ~ ~ ~ m j ~ ~ O
_
~ ~ N ~ -p N in U L C L ~ ~`
U ~ ~ N ~ ~j ~
'
"- 'O ~ ~ y
" ~ O ~ ~
p O ~ y ~ j ~ ~ ~ In j ~
~
O ~ O Uj
~ D
~
~` O d d. ~
C
~ ~ U
~
~
O ~ N ~ ~ O O
~ m "a O >,
C OL
Y
L m
C C O
~ ~ O C C p
~ ` >, > fl- -p N
IIII~ U ~ ~
..
>+
c~
O " N
0 ~
L >, +-~
~ C O
~ ~ L E ~ N
~ O
p
C
~ ~ ~ C (d (~
~ O
O .
~ ,
,
0
~
O ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ U
O
O O ~-' O
J U - U ~
0 0 0
m U ~ a~ ~ In ~
> ...
[0 ~ ~ -a Cb C ~
L cti C
O fn U O E
CSS
O
O p~~ O ciS 1 c~ L to N~
O
~ ca ~n 'n ~n ~ E cn cc ~n
~
C -54
2.'
i
'IV ~
P~ ~
-0 P ~
•
• • ' '~
• k
1~ v d' a
•
H
~1
~ ~1
1
C
y
•
• 1
• ~y
1
~
U
a
~~: a a a
N
c
• a o 0 0
e
~ O
• U
~
~ U
~
ti" U
~
te
~
~
> ..
.
L C .•
.
L ~ r
.
L ~
,5
~ ~
1 w D U D U D U
•
• ~ ~~
M
m ~~`~ ~
^
U
U
U
~,
~,< ~i
• ~
s~
• •
• a
U ~
m
m
~ U
O O - N ~ ~ 'D L 'O Q) ~ ~
r L
'
~ ~ C ~ ~ ~
~ O Vj fC
~ >+ O C Qj >+ C ~ C N > ~ > O ~_
~ ~ C Y O
0
"'
N c0
C
F'- "
N ~, ~ ` U ~C (0
m
°
°
c
c
oo ~
C O O ~
O O U
-O V= O E C 1] O L O O
°>
y~c0>
3°
o~c t0
O
3
~~.
p
ip
o
vi~
c
o ~ o
~ a~ ~-o
a~ ~~>.
~ o-`° ~
>,
-ai
,
X~
~
E ~ 3 °'~'~ `~ > N
c~
,p,
~ o
c o a
i E ~
-_ A N C- N ~ L N C
C O C fn C U d~ ~ L (d ~~ p 0 (d O
,
L w~ O (Q
~`
y
~
O N f0 O d C O (n O U E X y .'=
~ p V
~
~.
y
O N C O N~ E >, N N.L.. N (`0 x
~+ '` O
a E
O O ~_
L C L O~ (9 ~ X ~ O N~
N O +~
- O O O ~
C
O
`
~~ m c N 3°~ N N ~~,~
- O
' ~ cv ~
m O
N~ ~ c m-o ~ N U
o N
> ~ m U
~ °~~ ~ a~ a~ co m ~ °
k '
L
s
~
~ o ~ y
> o ~ ~ ~ o~
a~ .
a~
m > ~
o
o ~ ~ ~>,
K
U 'O C p, ~ ~ ~ r- ~ t9 N .~' ti ~ " - >,
C (D C
c0 ~
~ a~ ~ a O
~ a
~ ~ C O [0
y > ~ N N ~ ,
(9
O cn N O~ N~~ O~ N W~ ~~
O U
~ L •p
( _
~ Q j p N~ ~ p O~ 'O O V
~ N co
~ ~
~
L N U w L '~ >
N
"~ ,
^
~ C N
O C s 0
N C
~ N O C N V~ ~
N N C V
C V=~ O
C ~ N
N - L
3~
~ Q
~
,
N C B ,a
~
~
• m
m ~
~
"'
~'
N C B N µ- N N L m ~ ~~ N
' ~ a N ~ N O~~
~~ N L _O O ,~ C
w U U - ...
"'. G„
~. O f0 ~
p (0 - O N C " ,'~
C O O~ O f0 d L fd O (0 U N ° Q7 ~
O ~ +p,, N ` `
O U N - C ti
O d L E r L .O > O U p O L
O .a
~
C
'~ w L N N O `- ~. ~ h-
~ y O ~ X "°
(U C (0 ~
O ~ ~ p `
C N N C .L. O w L
O ~
~ ~
~
~ .O.. ,
O O
~
C ~ N O C ~ ~ ~,
• ~ O ~- O (0 C ~- C C ~D C ~~ L ~. O
~
Vi ~ y
y
V N O O> U~ O L E
~
C O C~~ L ~
N C~ C
4
O N`_ ~ N O N O O N~ =
~~ m~~~ d O
~
O
c
n3
(`0 ~ C t0 E~> C > N O- ~O~
X O O (9 O c0 ~
~
E~
~
~ O~ U
O (II _
O (9 O N y 0 O O fD O N C (C9
f~ O O L O ...
i
A
C i
N O d.
L to
F- O U L
? y
V d U
d (9
~iZ
`
~ U L .C C ~ ~ C U L N L
N
U
n
n I- W
4u
"9i~{
•
O •
C-55
•
•
• II
C
~'
•
•
Q
C
O
V
O
C CN
7 C
Q O
• ~
U
• - O
m
O ... ct3 c ~ ~
~~ ~ ono ~'a~~i o
~~cYS~oc
v c.ro~ o~c
ca O o
n.E ~'~~ c~~ a~
a~cd~a~°-cQ.oai~
Y _- L , ~L, O ~ - , ~ _
~ f7 >, ~ >' ~- C O
c _ co ~ i~ ~ ~ -a
c~ ~ ~ p O C ~ ~ .~ ~
O -a ~ U C ~ ,.,, L.
O
O~ TQ O .`. O L C~
~ Q C~ U y (n U O N
~ >+ O C ~ ~ O
- O C c0 O C~- O
NO ~-O~ U cti~
~ ~ (~ O p ~ tS3 p ~ t~
~ L
p U C O
C c~ ~ p ~ 7 c6 >
"~ i ~ C C ~`- C~ O_ "~
7~~ C "O ~ C O C
2 L J C L (0 O. OU r~
V1
C
O
.?
d
.Q
Q
Y
U
.C
U
_0
a
d
Y
C-56
O
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 11 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
APPLICANT: MARK CAPELLINO (CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI
LOCATION: 9850 6TH STREET; APN: 0209-211-19
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Completion Date
General Requirements
1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought agarnst the City, its _/_/_
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to
relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition
2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-24, Standard _/_/_
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect
B. Time Limits
n Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved
ment/Desi
1 Develo /_/_
g
p _
use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed
C. Site Development
1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations.
2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner
SC-11-04 1
C-57
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits
5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
D.
9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits
Building Design
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details
shall be included in building plans
E.
2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main
building colors
Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb)
SC-1-04
-/-/-
•
-/-/-
-/-/-
-/-/-
-/-/-
-/-/-
-/_/
/ /
-/-/-
-/-/.
-/_/
-/-/-
-/-/_ •
2
C-58
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
•
F.
G.
•
3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho _1_/_
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_
parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped
6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_
parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the
rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet.
Trip Reduction
1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_
residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage
spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a
3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100.
Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher
whole number
2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_
commercial, office, and industrial faalities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
3 For industrial projects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be _/_/
provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for
clothing and equipment shall be sufficient
Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods
3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_
commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger
4 W ithin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_
stalls
5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
SC-1-04
C-59
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 _/_/_
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be •
installed by the developer prior to occupancy
7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_
the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas
within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and
maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing,
and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within
30 days from the date of damage
9. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Department.
10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering _/_/_
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 6th Street.
11. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_
perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer •
12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code
H. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs
2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _/_/_
approval prior to issuance of building permits
I. Environmental
1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 474 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance
and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain
consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures
Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be
considered grounds for forfeit.
J. Other Agencies
1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_
of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
SC-1-04
4
C -60
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
K. General Requirements
1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. _/_/_
a Site/Plot Plan,
b. Foundation Plan,
c Floor Plan,
d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan,
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams,
f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2003-01185) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans
2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal
3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_
the City prior to permit issuance
4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_
5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_
Building and Safety Department
L. Site Development
1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_
marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2003-01185) The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations m
effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for
availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts
2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or /_/
mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may _
_
include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program
deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to
the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance
3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits
SC-1-04
5
G61
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays
5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public
counter)
M. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations
3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC
Section 1505
4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A
5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A.
6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed.
N. Grading
1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City Grading
Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits
5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed wdl generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
0. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map
2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline).
44 total feet on 6th Street
SC-1-04
6
/_/_
/--/_
/ /
/_/_
/_/_
/_/_
/_/
/ /
~ _1_/
-/-/-
/ /
-/-/-
-/-/.
-/-/-
/-/-
/_/_
C-62
Protect No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
P.
•
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved
4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring point
maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or
noted on the final map.
All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the
final map
Street Improvements
Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source
of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes
and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and
ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been
completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than
one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of
those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by
conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or
units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by
these conditions of approval of development.
2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to.
Street Name Curb &
Gutter A.C
Pvmt Side-
walk Drive
Appr. Street
Lights Street
Trees Comm
Trail Median
Island Bike
Trai!
Other
6th Street X X (c) X X (e)
SC-1-04
Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) curbside drain outlets
Improvement Plans and Construction
a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first
b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required
c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
7
-/-/.
/ /
-/-/-
/ /
/ /
/ /
-/-/.
/ /
-/-~-
-/-/-
C •63
Project No DRC2003-01185
Notes
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified
e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Cary
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer
f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots
h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street
improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction
legend stating' "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically
sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be
per the public landscape improvement plans.
The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer
Min
Grow
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty.
6th Street
Planting Areas
of
1) 8' or More Magnolia grandiflora 'Majestic Beauty' 8' 30' 15 Gal
O C.
2) 8' & Less Magnolia grandiflora 'St Mary' 3' 20' 15 Gal
OC
Construction Notes for Street Trees•
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department.
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only
6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required
SC-1-04
Completion Date
-~-/.
-~-~.
_~~-
-~-~-
-~-~-
-~-~
-~-~-
•
C -64
Project No DRC2003-01185
Q. Public Maintenance Areas
• 1. A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer
R. Drainage and Flood Control
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas
S. Improvement Completion
If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map,
an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City
will be required for: 6th Street
T. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary
3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
• Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects
4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved.
Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them.
U. General Requirements and Approvals
A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all
new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance if no map is involved
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall
be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if
at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from
landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to
the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and
Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following
the completion of the construction and/or demolition project
Completion Date
-/_/.
-/-/
-/-/-
-/-/.
-~_~
-/-/-
-/-/.
-/-/-
-/-/-
SC-1-04
9
C-65
Project No DRC2003-01185
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
V. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power.
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buldings, with
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development
3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be invandal-resistant fixtures
W. Security Hardware
One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices
X. Security Fencing
All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police
with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime
Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any
other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at
(909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or
extension 2475.
Y. Building Numbering
1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be
a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background
The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION
PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED
-~-~-
-~-~-
-~-~-
-~-~-
-~-~
-~-~-
-~-~-
-/_/.
•
•
SC-1-04
10
C-66
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT
TANDARD NDITI N
S CO O S
October 7, 2004
6th Industrial Protect
6th St. between Archibald and Hermosa
(12) Parcel Protect
DRC2003-01185 & SUBTPM16445
THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply
Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and
location of fire hydrants:
a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet.
No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire
hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet.
b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are'
• i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public
roadways.
ii. At intersections.
iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District
v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building
c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant
measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or building, additional private
or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided
d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gprn of required fire flow or fraction thereof
FSC-2 Fire Flow
1. The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,125
gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects
a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in
accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance
with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances
C-67
2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide
the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent
property shall not be used to provide required fire flow.
3. Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to •
or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are
approved.
4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the
proposed project site.
FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit
plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping.
Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the
overhead fire sprinkler system plans.
FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 ,California Fire Code and/or any other
applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in:
Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet.
2. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access).
3 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and
the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 .
4. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered.
FSC-5 Fire Alarm System
The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code
require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and
a building permit are required Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and
specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire
Alarm Standard #10-6.
FSC-6 Fire District Site Access
Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads,
streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access
Roadways Std #9-7
1. Location of Access• All portions of the structures 1 S~ story exterior wall shall be located within
150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the
building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed
obstructions
2
•
C-68
2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are.
a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet
. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet.
c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet.
d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet.
e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches.
At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side.
g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent.
h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%
i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW).
Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-
feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department
apparatus.
3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided
as #ollows:
a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001
California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards.
b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or
mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When
railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required
openings.
4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus
access road to all required building exterior openings.
5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be
in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply:
a. The gate shall slide open horizontally or swing inward.
b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width.
c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet
d Gates are not required to be motorized Motorized gates must have a manual over ride or
battery back up.
6 Fire Lane Identification. Fled curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan
illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be
included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval
7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly
noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application # 05822 & #
05842 must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review.
C
3
C-69
FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits
Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building
construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field •
inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or
operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce
conditions that may be hazardous to life or property.
• Aerosol Products
• Application of Flammable Finishes
• Automobile Wrecking Yards
• Battery Systems
• Candles and open flames in public assemblies
• Cellulose Nitrate
• Compressed Gases
• Cryogenics
• Dry Cleaning Plants
• Dust-Producing Processes and Operations
• Explosive or Blasting Agents
• Flammable and Combustible Liquids
• Fruit Ripening Plants
• Hazardous Materials
• High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS)
• Liquefied Petroleum Gases
• LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings
Magnesium Working
Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation
Open Burning
Organic Coating
Ovens
Powder Coating
Public Assembly
Pyrotechnical Special Effects
Radioactive Materials
Refrigeration Systems
Repair Garages
Rubbish Handling Operations
Spraying or Dipping Operations
Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported
Structures
Tire Storage
Welding and Cutting Operations
Wood Products/Lumber Yards
FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino
The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan
for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials
Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA
Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be
finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business
Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from
issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific
hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be
required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility
4
•
•
C -70
•
•
2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also
required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is
subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the
provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5)
working days, if requested by the owner
FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services
Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of
equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001
California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39
and other implemented and/or adopted standards.
FSC-13 Alternate Method Application
Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has review and approved (2) applications
for Alternate Methods. Per Alt. Method # 5822 Buildings 10 & 11 must be constructed with a
sprinkler system capable of protecting a high hazard classification commodity stored in racks up
to 20'. Per Alt. Method # 5842 Buildings 2, 4, 6, & 8 sprinklers systems may be supplied from the
hydrant loop.
FCS-14 Map Recordation
1. Reciprocal Access Agreement. The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department
access:
a. Crosses a property line.
b. Is shared by multiple owners, and
c. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association. Please provide a
permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District
The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other
structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The
recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented
to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement
shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino
2 To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in
the submittal:
a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties
included in the agreement
b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement
c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radii and slope
of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the
requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7
•
5
C -71
3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required
private fire mains or appurtenances
a. Crosses a property line.
b. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, and
c. Is shared by multiple owners.
Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private
water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The
agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The
agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to
recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San
Bernardino.
Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the
issuance of any building permits:
•
Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans,
specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water mam system for review and
approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards.
Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building
permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply
system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The •
Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections
All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any
combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation,
witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped.
2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the
locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD.
On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference
the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard.
All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any
combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and
witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of
the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before
lumber is dropped.
3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements
of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed
at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road.
4. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for
obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction
Services
5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements• All easements and agreements must be recorded with
the County of San Bernardino
6
C-72
PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER
The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services'
• "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures".
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following:
1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire
hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property,
the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location.
2 Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the
presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-
site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for
hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction
Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required
fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code.
3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler
system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler
monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler
monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of
the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power).
5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected,
tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment
is placed in service.
6. Fire Alarm S~ stem: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system
shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must
be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire
Construction Services.
8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access
roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire
Construction Services
9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and
contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the
method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and
the maintenance of all required fire access roadways.
10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-
family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background,
visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building
setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum
number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be
required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial
7
C-73
and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front
and back of all suites.
11. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must •
demonstrate (m writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk
Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino
County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division.
The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services.
12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides
contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or
property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector.
13. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/2" x 11 " or 11 " x 17"
site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to
reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site
plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector.
8
•
•
C -74
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
• Regular Meeting
September 26, 2007
Chairman Stewart called the Regular Meeting of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7 03 p m The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California Chairman
Stewart then led in the pledge of allegiance
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS. PRESENT Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Pam
Stewart, Ray Wimberly
ABSENT None'
STAFF PRESENT Rebecca Coleman, Office Specialist II, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney,
Donald Granger, Associate Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer,
Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, Lois Schrader, Planning
Commission Secretary, Denise Srnk, Office Specialist II, Mike Smith,
Associate Planner, James Troyer, Planning Director
*«**,~
ANNOUNCEMENTS
• Chairman Stewart suggested Item D related to the Temporary Sign Ordinance be heard first on the
public hearing section of the agenda. The Commissioners agreed to do so
****~
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carved 4-0-1 (Stewart abstain), to approve the
minutes of September 12, 2007.
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
None
***~:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO - A
request to amend an Engineering Department condition of approval, requiring existing utilities
(communication and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) to be placed underground, for a
recently completed office/warehouse complex consisting of 11 buildings totaling 126,843
square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850
6th Street - APN 0209-211-19 Related File Tentative Parcel Map TPM16445 and Tree
C •75
Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
was adopted on March 23, 2005 This project does not raise or create new environmental
impacts not already considered in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and
therefore no subsequent environmental review is needed •
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer presented the staff report
Commission Munoz asked for a review of the options shown on Page A-3 of the staff report
Mr James said in Option 1 the developer would be responsible for in lieu fees for 366 feet of their
frontage, Option 2 would require in-lieu fees for Parcels 1 and 2 for frontage of 665 feet and Option
3 would deny the applicant's request and would require the undergrounding per the conditions of
approval
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked Mr James to explain the situation with the Edison vaults and the
added costs
Mr James explained that this is a unique situation because what they would have to underground is
actually over 900 feet because of the location of several I~rge Edison vaults and the proximity of the
parcels in question to an Edison substation He commented that he did not know why Edison is
requiring the vaults but that the undergrounding plans are done
Vice Chairman Fletcher confirmed that if the developer performs the undergrounding, the cost of the
vaults must be part of that project
Commissioner Howdyshell asked if the statements on Page A-2 of the report in the Analysis section
about 'due consideration' directly refers to Option 1 or Option 2
Mr James asked that the question be referred to the developer •
Chairman Stewart confirmed that Parcel 1 is not part of this development, that Parcel 2 came with
the responsibility to take care of the undergrounding, but it is not required of Parcel 1 and that there
is only one other parcel left open for development and that most if the area in question has overhead
electrical/communication lines
Mr James said that is correct. He added that two buildings on this property cannot be occupied
until the public improvements are completed and this is part of those improvements He remarked
that an application for the remaining open site was submitted about two months ago
Chairman Stewart confirmed that the vacant parcel will also have a condition requiring
undergrounding but that the remainder of the block has overhead lines
Commissioner Munoz asked if when Parcel 2 was developed, would the developer be made aware
of the conditions related to Parcels 1 and 2
Mr James confirmed that the developer would be made aware of that fact
Mark Capellino, 2020 Del Amo Boulevard, #105, Torrance, thanked staff and Mr James He
commented that Brad Buller is their consultant He noted that he has developed a modest amount
of property in Rancho Cucamonga and that this is the first time he has made such a request He
said he has received an estimate of about $800,000 in costs related to this condition and that this
requirement would eliminate any profit on the development project He commented that he could
not have chosen a more difficult site because there is the substation to the west and railroad tracks
to the east He said the undergrounding protect would create mayor traffic and electrical disruption •
Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 26, 2007
C -76
and that even when finished, not one pole would come down because the 66kV lines would remain
He said the City has only collected about $46,000 in in-lieu fees and that with the majority of the
properties already developed, there would belittle opportunity for him to be reimbursed He said he
• knew of the situation and it is an "inherited" problem He said he knew of the requirement but was
not aware of the significant costs He said he realizes it is an unusual request
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked who regulates the communications lines
Mr Capellino stated Charter Communications has one line and the Venzon lines are already
underground He said they did underground 200 feet of their line He said he is working with
Charter He said the issue relates to the Edison lines
Commissioner Howdyshell asked if the "due consideration" noted in the Analysis section of the
report relates to Option 1 or Option 2 and if Option 1 is what the applicant is requesting
Mr James said Option 2 is the $172,235 fee
Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing and seeing/hearing no further comment, closed the
public hearing
Commissioner Munoz commented that nothing is gained by undergrounding the two parcels in
question because there will still be lines on the overhead poles He said he supports Option 2
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked for some explanation regarding lines in the right of way and the
agreements for communication lines versus utility lines He asked if this is an easement controlled
by the City and why is one set of lines underground and the other overhead
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney commented that when the utility lines are installed overhead
• He said that if another company wants to hang a line, they may co-locate overhead if they can
obtain an agreement from the company that owns the poles
Mr Troyer interjected that it is an easement.
Mr James said it is usually a franchise agreement with the utility company
Mr. Ennis noted that if other lines are required then the new provider must be undergrounded He
added that if the first one allowed has overhead lines, then they can add overhead lines with an
agreement with the utility that owns the pole He said if the electrical company lines are
undergrounded then everyone must underground their lines
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if that is contrary to take in-lieu fees and to require undergrounding of
others
Mr Ennis said the purpose of the in lieu fees is to collect a pool of monies for the purpose of
undergrounding that street or area of the community
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the two options are to take in the in-lieu fees but then require the
undergrounding of the communications lines
Mr James said the fee is a normal fee for electrical lines but there are additional fees for
communication lines He said the fees shown in the staff report are reduced because they are for
the electrical lines only He said the developer is already working with Charter Communications for
his lines to be undergrounded
•
Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 26, 2007
C -77
Vice Chairman Fletcher said undergroundrng is visually a good thing whenever possible He said it
is unfortunate that it is piecemeal and that in a perfect world, it would be better if the utility company
could spread their fees for this amongst their customers so that all the undergroundrng would be
covered •
Mr Ennis said that some portion of monies taken in by the State is transferred back to the cities
annually to be used for undergroundrng, but it is never enough to cover the costs
Mr James commented that is referred to Rule 20-A He noted that 5 years ago the City had spent
all those monies
Vice Chairman Fletcher said we need to be reasonable and he is in support of Option 2 He
commented that he believes the water pipes rn front of the property are as visually objectionable as
the overhead lines He asked if there is something they could do about that
Mr Capeilino commented that they are backflow pipes that were required by CCVWD He said they
were unable to install the public water line in any other location on the property because of other
constraints He said he is trying to find a way to satisfy both the Fire District and the Planning
Department in this regard, but there is not much latitude as to where they could be located He
agreed it is obtrusive He said in regard to Charter Communications, that if the City allows the in-lieu
fees to be collected to consider applying them to the communications line
Chairman Stewart asked what the higher fee would be to add the communications lines to the
undergroundrng
Mr James said it is $259 for the Edison lines and over $300 for the in lieu fee per foot to include the
communication lines. He said this is rn the purview of the Planning Commission to adjust this
Vice Chairman Fletcher said there is some value if the fees can be used to do the improvements •
later
Mr James said this case is an unusual hardship because of the Edison lines but that normally the
communication line undergroundrng is not an undue hardship He said in this case the Edison line
project rs about three times the normal cost
Commmissioner Munoz confirmed that the communication line undergroundrng is comparable to
what any other developer would expect to pay.
Mr James said that is the case
Chairman Stewart said she supports undergroundrng utilities but this property has significant issues
She said the Edison fees are an undue hardship on this particular development She commented
that she visited the site and there would not be much gained by undergroundrng the Edison lines
because no poles would be removed as other overhead lines would still remain She commented
that the developer did know about the requirement but she would support Option 2 with the fees of
the $172, 235 and that all the communication lines be undergrounded She concurred with Vice
Chairman Fletcher that something needs to be done about the visual effect of the water pipes
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the in-lieu fees are collected for specific sites or can they be pooled
and used for other undergroundrng projects
Mr James said they are site specific
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the money would ever be used elsewhere •
Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 26, 2007
C -78
Mr James stated it is a trust account and not general fund monies He said it is possible that the
funds collected would never be used but that there is a slight possibility that there would be an
undergrounding opportunity in the future
• Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, to continue the item to the October 24, 2007
meeting at which time a resolution incorporating a modification of the undergrounding condition
presented as Option 2 will be brought to the Commission for approval. Motion carried by the
following vote
AYES FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY
NOES NONE
ABSENT NONE -carried
.**w*
WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A proposal to construct a building of about 22,680 square feet on
vacant parcel of 1 23 acre in the General Industnal (GI) District, (Subarea 13), located at 9 5
arles Smith Avenue - APN 0229-283-02 Related file Tentative Parcel ap
S TPM18680 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environments pacts
for co sideration
C ENVIRO ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBT 18680 -THE
WILLIAM FO GROUP - A review of a proposed 3-unit subdivision for con minium purposes
of a building to constructed on a vacant parcel of 1 23 acre in the neral Industnal (GI)
District, (Subarea ), located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-283-02 Related
file Development view DRC2007-00253 Staff has prepay d a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environ ntal impacts for consideration
Mike Smith, Assoaate Planner, p sented the staff report He ted he received a letter from the
AQMD questioning the models use or the air quality analys of the project He commented that
the applicant responded to the letter e reported that th AQMD asked for one mitigation to be
modified which stipulates that trucks onl e allowed to le 5 minutes instead of 10 minutes He
said no other public comments were receiv on the ro~ect
Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing an Being and hearing no comment, closed the public
hearing
Ruben Warren, representing the Willis ox Group tha ed staff for their assistance He added
that they produced two reports, a hab t assessment and r quality
Commissioner Munoz commen that this is a good exam of staff working well with the
developer He noted that eve ith the building facing the freewa the developer did a good fob
using 360 degree architect and using other design elements toe ance the architecture
Vice Chairman Fletche commented that it is a good product for the commu y He thanked staff for
recommending that arking be provided for the second floor in the event tha oor becomes office
space He said t t is a good recommendation and he approved of that proves n
Motion ved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolutions approving evelopment
Review D 2007-00253 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18680 with the adoption o Mitigated
Negate Declaration of environmental impacts Motion carried by the following vote
AYE FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY
N S NONE
•
Planning Commission Minutes
-5-
September 26, 2007
C-79
RESOLUTION NO 07-64
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THEIR APPROVAL
OF DRC2003-01185 AN OFFICE COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 11
BUILDINGS TOTALING 126,843 SQUARE FEET ON 7 27 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUB AREA 5), AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0209-211-19
A Recitals
1. On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on DRC2003-01185 application and concluded said
hearing on that date Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission
conditionally approved DRC2003-01185 through adoption of their Resolution No 05-85
2 Mark Capellino of Cap Brothers Construction Company, on behalf of Trade Union
International, filed a request to modify the conditions of approval for DRC2003-01185 requiring
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities and instead require payment of in lieu fee for the
utility lines Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application "
3 On the 26th day of September 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the said public
hearing to October 24, 2007
• 4 On the 24th day of October 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on
that date
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows
1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct
2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on September 26th and October 24th, 2007, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as
follows
a The application applies to the property located at 9850 6th Street with a combined
street frontage of 665 feet on 6th Street and is presently improved with eleven office/warehouse
buildings with a combined floor area of 126,843 square feet, and
b The previously adopted conditions of approval, specifically Engineering Department
Speaal Condition No 3, required the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities along 6th
Street, pursuant to this Commission's Resolution No 87-96, and
c On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-96
establishing a revised policy for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities This policy was
C -80
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-64
MODIFICATION OF DRC2003-01185 - 9850 6TH STREET
October 24, 2007
Page 2
intended "to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and
desirable working and living environment within the City." The Resolution states that the policy
applies to all developments except those specifically exempted "and any others specifically waived
by the Planning Commission "Overhead utilities include telecommunication (phone and cable) and
electrical but excludes 66KV or larger electrical lines, and
d The Commission's utility undergrounding policy includes seven exemptions,
however, the development project did not qualify for any of these exemptions, and
e The adopted Planning Commission Resolution No 05-24 contains an Engineering
Department condition dealing with utility undergrounding Condition No 3 requires undergrounding
on the project side of 6th Street along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of
PM15948 from the first pole off-site east and west
3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning
Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and
approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
•
a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Negative Declaration on March 23, 2005, in connection with
the City's approval of DRC2003-01185 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent •
or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary
approvals of the same project unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that
indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (ii) substantial changes have occurred in
the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more
severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or
more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now
feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce
impacts
b The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the current application, that
substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred
which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative
Declaration The current application requests the modification of a condition requiring utility
undergrounding Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously
analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not regwired to reduce the impacts
of the project to a level of less than significant The proposed modification of the utility
undergrounding will not change the project design
c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to
CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application
4 Based upon the findings set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission
hereby modifies their previous action approving DRC2003-01185 by deleting Engineering
Department Special Condition No 3 and replacing with the following
C -81
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-64
MODIFICATION OF DRC2003-01185 - 9850 6TH STREET
• October 24, 2007
Page 3
An in-lieu of construction cost shall be deposited with the City for the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and Southern
Calrfornra Edson communication Imes, except for the 66kV electrical) along
the enure project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948. The ~n-lieu
of construction cost shall be based upon the City's current adopted amount
of $259 00 per foot for electrical Imes plus $51 00 perfoot forcommunicat~on
Imes
5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2007
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
ATTEST
Pam Stewart, Chairman
• James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary
I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October 2007, by the following vote-to-wit
AYES COMMISSIONERS
NOES COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS
•
c-82
T H E C I T Y O F ~~«« ++~~pp v~~,~~~~~~yy
,H Y~FJ,1'AiiPSTJ3~G~yi93YaF
RANCHO C U C A M O N G A
Stiff Report
DATE. October 24, 2007
TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY' Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 -
FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L)
Residential District, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street at
6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 - FERRERA - A
request for a Variance to reduce the required lot area average from 15,000 square feet to
• approximately 14,400 square feet in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide a property of
1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 6970 East
Avenue -APN• 0227-121-34 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration
Recommendation Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission grant a continuance for Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM18196 until the November 14, 2007, Planning Commission hearing date in order to
provide adequate time to advertise the related Variance DRC2006-00538
Respectively Submitted,
~•
Jam s R Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
JT TV/ge
•
ITEM D