Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/08/08 - Agenda PacketTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO AUGUST 8, 2007 - 7:00 PM C,UCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly _ • II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be rout-ne and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, rt should be removed for drscussron IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The followrng items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign rn after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON LTD - A request to construct a 36,154 square foot industrial building on a 1 93 parcel in the General Industrial District, (Subarea 8), located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue APN 0229-171-23 Staff has 1 of F - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 8, 2007 RANCHO ~,;UCAIvIONGA prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration B TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18579 -DOUG GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide Building C, one of the buildings of a three-building office/commeraal complex of about 4 acres that is under construction, into 19 units for condominium purposes m the Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 6, of the Haven Overlay, located at the west side of Haven Avenue about 330 feet north of 6th Street, APN 0209-262-19 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP99-53. This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Secfion 15301(k) Existing Facilities. C THIRD TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92 78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction The tract is part of a larger project which includes a request for a parcel map and two tentative tract maps to subdivide 248 63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose of single- familyhome construction in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0225-071-37, 48, and 50 and 0225-081-08, and 11 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m July 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS D CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue • • 2 of 5 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 8, 2007 12ANCxo C,UCAMONGA APN 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14 Related Files. Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636 CONTINUED FROM JULY 25, 2007 E CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING -A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District Subarea 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. APN 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006- 00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636 CONTINUED FROM JULY 25, 2007 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS F CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN POSITIONS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION G CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Comm~ss~on THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A SPECIAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 22, 2007 AT 5:00 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND THEN WILL EMBARK ON A HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PROJECT TOUR 3 of 5 -- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA J RANCHO AUGUST 8, 2007 C,UCAMONGA 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 2, 2007, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga d*~`"" If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours pnor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items • • 4 of 5 • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA J AUGUST 8, 2007 1tANCxo C,UCA:v10NGA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http./lwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 5of5 Vicinity Map Planning Commission August 8, 2007 • • • N Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive /.. -~ >~~ . T H E C I T Y O F RL\NCH O C~UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: August 8, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Rina Leung, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON - A request to construct a 36,154 square foot industrial building on a 1 93 parcel in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue APN: 0229-171-23 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant/industrial pipe storage, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South -Truck repair, General Industrial District, Subarea 8 East -Vehicle storage, General Industrial District, Subarea 8 West -Contractors' office/storage, General Industrial District, Subarea 8 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site -General Industrial District Subarea 8 North -Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South -General Industrial District, Subarea 8 East -General Industrial District, Subarea 8 West -General Industrial District, Subarea 8 C. Site Characteristics The subject site is located on the southeast portion of the City on Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue and is composed of 1.93 acre The protect area is developed with industrial uses (i e , contractors' office/storage, outdoor storage areas, and truck repair). Access to the site is via a new 35-foot wide driveway decorated with scored colored sandblasted concrete paving, located on the west portion of the site. • ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Design Parameters. According to the Site Plan, the 36,154 square foot light industrial building will be located along the northeast portion of the site. The project has included a tower entry element embellished with a metal seam curved roof and a metal canopy that is visible from Arrow Route. The entryway is further articulated with bronze reflective glazing, stale tiles, and scored terra cotta tiles. Other decorative elements that have been incorporated on all elevations include: Reveals Bronze reflective glazing Sand blasted concreted panels along the bottom portion of the building To provide further depth and interest, the architect has offset the foot print of the building to avoid a "box" shape. Also, the height of the building varies from 30 feet to 34 feet to provide vertical interest to the elevations. B. Parking: The proposed project includes a dock located on the southwest (rear) portion of the site. This dock will not be visible from the public right-of-way and will be located within an area covered by a roof and set back within the interior of the building. Two additional dock doors are proposed along the southern portion of the building, in a location that is not visible from the public right-of-way. The applicant will provide the development with a total of 40 parking stalls, which complies with Development Code requirements. Parking stalls are located along the south and • west portions of the site. Two gates are proposed along the interior of the project site. Since these gates will be located at least 140 feet from the front property line, it is not anticipated that they would create cueing impacts along Arrow Route. In addition, 6-foot high concrete panels will be utilized as fencing along the rear portion of the site. C. Landscaping. The applicant has included 36-inch high berms along the front yard landscaping area along with the planting of Brisbane Box, Carolina Cherry, and Austrian Willows trees, which will provide texture and interest. The project includes a concrete seating bench and an outdoor employee area. The Landscaping Plans depict scored sandblasted color concrete paving along the driveway, building entry, and employee break area to further enhance the site. The project site will include a landscaping coverage of 18 percent, which exceeds the 12 percent minimum in the Municipal Code. D Compatibility with surrounding Land Use Designations: Although the proposed project site is in an area currently developed with industrial/storage uses and it is adjacent to properties designed as General Industrial, the property to the north beyond Arrow Route is currently utilized as an industrial pipe storage area and has the land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). According to Section 17 30.020 of the Development Code, the General Industrial District provides for a range of light and medium industrial types of activities, including: manufacturing, assembling, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses. This land use category is intended to function as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses. In these areas, the applicable • development and design standards have been created to ensure a pleasant, well-functioning environment To further ensure minimal impacts to surrounding uses, certain land uses in the A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 • Page 3 General Industrial District require approval of a Conditional Use Permit and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) clearance. Since the occupants of the new building have not been determined at this time, the permitted uses m the Development Code allows for uses that will be compatible with the properties to the north with the Low-Medium Residential designations In addition, more intensive land uses will require a Conditional Use Permit which entails a public hearing notification process and CEQA clearance. Furthermore, Arrow Route along with the design of the dock and the location of the building (activities will be oriented towards the rear of the site), will serve to buffer the site from future residential uses to the north E Site Improvements: Currently, the street frontage of Arrow Route lacks street improvements; therefore, the applicant will be required to install a curb and gutter, asphalt pavement to the centerline of the street, a meandering side walk, a drive approach, street lights, and trees, along with other improvements in the public right-of-way. F. Grading and Technical Review Committee: The Committees reviewed and recommended approval of the project on June 5, 2007, with incorporated conditions. G. Design Review Committee: On June 5, 2007, the Design Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the project with conditions. H. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was prepared for the entire project and circulated for • public review Based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the protect could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact unless reduced to a level of less-than-significant by the implementation mitigation measures. Areas identified as subject to potential environmental impacts were in Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Noise, Air Quality, Geology and Soils, and Transportation and Traffic Proposed mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval of the project; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the project. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received in regards to this project. RECOMMENDATION• The buildings m this area tend to lack design embellishment. Examples of existing buildings in the area include metal buildings, converted residential structures functioning as offices, and other boxy buildings that tack articulation. The proposed building which includes embellished features such as; a decorative entry way, bronze reflective glazing, reveals, and sand blasted concreted panels will enhance the architectural quality of the area. Based on the analysis included in the Staff Report, staff believes that the proposed use will be compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of Development Review DRC2006-00692 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions and the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Re ectfully suQbmitt , ~l• • Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT.RUge A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 4 Attachments. Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Site Utilization Plan Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -First Floor Plan Exhibit E -Second Floor Plan Exhibit F -Roof Plan Exhibit G -Elevations Exhibit H -Landscaping Plan Exhibit I -Grading Plan Exhibit J -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 5, 2007 Exhibit K -Initial Study Parts I and II Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00692 C7 J • A-4 r- -~ i i o ~! a o -„~.-T. ,; ~ - - - ~ ; I ~ - i a~ i ~- I L E I ,~, ~ ~ a ~ ~ o ~° °~ I I I Ca ~ _ 0 L r }, ~ ~ y~ ~ • ~ I ~ ~ I ° ~ - .V - I ~ p c I _ `_ L. 1 ~ I ~ - ~ I Q aC i I ~ ~' I I I a ~ ~ I I ~ , I i ~ ~ I -_--------------- ~ _---------_----- EXHIBIT B A-6 • c C .~ • 9~ ~; !~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ,' P~S~~9 ~a ~`e ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ E~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g E ~ r et Y ~~ `~ ~ ~~ 8~ e ~ ~~'s ~~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ v sE ~=Q~ E6Sf ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ g g ~ ~ ~ fi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 1 ~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ 9 ~~~ ~~~ ~~9~ ~~ .... . EXHIBIT C ~ ~ ~ A ~~ ~ 0 _~' _~ ik 4F~4 S~ ~' " '`:~ o $ ~~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ E Y ~El~~~,~~ls;~y~il~~i!!lAElttt~;~~aeA i~~eaaa ~l~g~Z~.2! Al~~~~~ ~! ~Ei~ iAr t di !: ~fii oaaoooaaamaoo®oo©mmmoomoom®ma©ooo .~c L 0 V C ~N~ I..L L _~ .a-. c~ C C N d O ~ C ~~ . ~ "~ •""' Jai r..~ . O N~ N ~O N ~- C W C Q ~~ a~ ~~.s p5°n p5&~ ~~~ Ij~ ~^ ~ , +. s~' ~:x;. %' ,;; ~',. _, A-7 ~~~ N ~ 4 <~ ~~ ~~~ U~o° • ~ ~ `o U ~_ U ~ O ~ '_~ U Q ~ EXHIBIT D A-8 • ~XHIBIT E A-9 p~ N <~ ~ CB L~ L O O U cv U c' ~ o tT5 ~ U O 0 .~ Ca Q ~ ~~ oa ~~^F ~~~ R~ R- '~ ~;.-r ;. ~ .t U' ~ t .~~~~ ~1 Z ~ j1i~~ i Y i sili~ ~ oo©a©oa EXHIBIT F c~ ~ R L //~~~ {.L. 0 U c_~a ~ ~~ O L Q a~ Q s J C O C W @~ da ~~s~ gggggg F.^- ~~&F a '. ~~ M~ ~'~~+.< u ~is»Yhj'~ v'i l • • • A-10 _, i • ~1 ~ j l l l ~ ~ i l ~ of ~ el Z! z~~~~~; ~ll~ :~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r e ! Y 3iiili~~ I~ii~ldi ~ a s aoooa a o ooaao©o© 1~ • • 1 I- O n L L_ r ~- ~~~~ L C U °-~~ : W a6a ~a O w Q c m Q O a J c 0 ca c w` ~~ ~a ~~§e 1~~~ ~` aff EXHIBIT G A.,, RLC-A[(NU GiiL q Vmi WPM 001 ~fi ~0 4~M0 0-Si naPUl N{i I I "j ar~o """"moo ~ o6uowoonO oyouod ~o ~l;~O ~ ~ `_ ~ ~ ! ~',,,'"~'..,;',;,';",,; .lVMH91H MO2lab' '' o N2/dd 7t/RIlSl1ON1 MO21Nb' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 a s ~ $~ s ~. ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ . a ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ g ~, ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~~ ~pp U O~ N JnI1 nIaIJV1O1/Wd Ink/ OD'®L 3JpJ0 ADN g ~ ~Y~ O7 3~CA k ~ m ~~ ~~ ~ ~ bye ~ ~ ~ o 'p°° ~. - ~, ~ ~ ~ 'o EXHIBIT „~' ~ Wd b0 5£ 4 L I ~ j i ' I I ~~ ~; I I ~ I ~~ zf @~ ~ ~ Lo ~. qq ~~ oy ~~ R~ ~~ ~H ~ \ ~~~ ~ Q~ ~8 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ -'- F g~ oB H EXHIBIT I ~ - ~ . A_,3. . ~~ 6w ~ ~J ~~la~~ SZ9~ Id 6uipea~ wi~aad M \9Z5q.~ele a.~ e ..J- p R gd°l~gBBg ~ ~ ~_4 9~ ~~~$'e ~8 ~b ~ ~ ~ ~~ Z ~ a g o 'b pp6 d~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~ a @ g A~g~y^y~ b b a ( ~ ~~~ a 1 ~ 3 {~~~ ~ ~ Is' y ~I i ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8 00 p m Rina Leung June 5, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00692 - ERIN MADISON -The request to develop a 36,154 square foot industrial building m the Industrial Park Distract (Subarea 8), located south on Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue - APN: 0229-171-10 Design Parameters The subject site is located on the southeast portion of the City on Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue The project area is developed with industrial uses (i e , contractors' office/storage, outdoor storage areas, and truck/auto repair) Currently, the street frontage of Arrow Highway lacks street improvements, therefore, the applicant will be required to install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement to the centerline of the street, a meandering sidewalk, a drive approach, street lights, and trees, along with other improvements m the public right-of-way. Access to the site is via a new 35-foot wide drive-way decorated with scored colored sandblasted concrete paving located on the west portion of the site According to the Site Plan, the building will be located along the northeast portion of the site with a dock located on the southwest (rear) portion of the site The dock will not be visible from the public right-of-way and will be located within an area covered by a roof and set back within the interior of the building Two additional dock doors are proposed along the southern portion of the building in a location that is not visible from the public right-of-way The Applicant will provide the development with a total of 40 parking stalls, which complies with Development • Code requirements Parking stalls are located along the south and west portions of the site Two gates are proposed along the interior of the project site. Since these gates will be located at least 140 feet from the front property line, it is not anticipated that they would create cueing impacts along Arrow Highway In addition, 6 foot-high concrete panels will be utilized as fencing along the rear portion of the site The project has included a tower entry element embellished with a metal seam curved roof and a metal canopy The entryway is further articulated with bronze reflective glazing, stale tiles, and scored terra cotta tiles Other decorative elements that have been incorporated on all elevations include Reveals, and Bronze reflective glazing, and Sand blasted concreted panels along the bottom portion of the building. To provide further depth and interest, the architect has off set the foot print of the building to avoid a "box" shape. Also, the height of the building varies from 30 feet to 34 feet to provide vertical interest to the elevations The applicant has included 36-inch high berms along the front yard landscaping area with the planting of Brisbane Box, Carolina Cherry and Austrian Willow trees, which will provide texture and interest. The project also has included a concrete seating bench and an outdoor employee • area EXHIBIT J A-14 DRC ACTION AGENDA June 5, 2007 • Page 2 Staff Comments• Staff has no major or secondary issues but does require the following conditions incorporated to be included m the Planning Commission Resolution 1 A detail of the decorative paving at the entrance shall be shown on the Construction Plans 2 A detailed landscaping plan shall be shown on the Construction Plans depicting the location, size, and species 3 A detail or elevation of the steel gate shall be shown on the Construction Plans. The steel gate shall be painted to match the building 4 The outdoor employee eating area(s) shall be covered with a decorative trellis shade structure; a screen wall minimum of 3 feet high should surround the eating area(s), tables, chairs, and the trash receptacles 5 All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have a light pointed downwards to avoid glare 6 All equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened and • architecturally compatible with the elevation design from the view of the surrounding properties and the public rights-of-way The Edison transformer location shall be shown on the Construction Plans and screened with mature landscaping 7 Electrical panels shall be located inside a cabinet within the building. 8. All downspouts on the building shall be inside walls of the building 9. The paint scheme shall be in compliance with the approved colors by the Design Review Committee Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and forward the project to the Planning Commission for consideration Design Review Committee Action. Members Present Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz Staff Planner Rina Leung The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission as presented • A•15 Qz N O O CD O O tV W i- Z W L1. J W W A•16 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose,o# this form -is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed protect so that the Cityinayrreview the project pursuant #o Cit~f ,Policies, Ordinances, and aGuidelines;izthe CaiiforrJi~, -Eilvironrrae~rit~i".QuaJity ,Act;` ,and the '~City~s~ ~R~ules and r sPr~cedures ~.~o linpier~`ient CEQA~ ,it is ~ini~portant tha#_ ~the:in#orniatioi~ reques#ed in ~h'is .appf~cation be~provid`ed in #u~l. ~-'~ ~ - - -~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that-t-s the -espons~bilityof the applicant to ensure that the appficatron -s complete at the hme of subm-ttal; C-ty staff wdl not be available fo perform worts requur~d to provide mrss-ng information Applrcabon Number for the project to which th-s form perta-ns: _ ~C ~p ~ ~ D~e! Z, Project Tdle jc-r5'l~J ~,6ryCr~ip Name & Address ofproiect owner(s): ^~i~/~/~Ii~~~~,~1 L~,~• ~~~i-~~~rl ~- 9au.~ Name & Address of developer or project sponsor ~~ ~S dlJ/~ Confact Person & Address ~}'~ ~s/~.~jy~~ ~4:p U~{//y~srj~J ~ ~~c~ ~t~l~~~~~ ~ 7~0 Name & Address of person prepanng th-s form (rf d-fferent from above) ~~1G>'~ `~('f~/O~/~ X070 ~i5t~/~S ~ ~ ~Z4~ l1e 1/jiY~, ~- /9~z Telephone Number ~~ ~J' 7' / ~ I • Fmnrnmm~n4eltnf..C......~ ,a... Page 1 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM EXHIBIT K A-17 • '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro~ecf s-te, and rnd~cate the site boundaries 2) Pravrde a set of color photographs that show representative wews into the s-te from the north, south, east and west• wews into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative yews of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Project t_ocabon (describe). y~~ j 5`~ ~~ fy P~~ ~~/~~y 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addfional sheet rf necessary) ~~~~ ~ ~'~.,~0 ~ O ' CX~t1 '5) Gross Site Area (adsq. fi). ~ ~ a? 6~~ ~l ~F '6) Net Srte A ~a (total srfe sue minus area of public streets & proposed ~? ~ ~~~~~?!~(~ ~~ ded~cahons 7) Describe any proposed genera! plan amendment or zone change which would affect the probed srfe (attach additional sheet rf necessary) /ti~ 8) Include a description of a!I permits which wrl! be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order fo fully implement the pro~ed~ 9) Describe the physical setting of the srfe as rt exists before the project including information on topography, soi! sfabrl~ty, plants and animals, mature bees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on srfe (including age and condrt~on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of srgn~cant features described In addition, cite al! sources of -nformafron (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) V~4c..~ ~~ ~ v7~~%~~f oN~~~~ ~~-~ F`vY ~r~/~c~-iNk Rio ~ ~~ c~R, U~~i~'~oN . /~ ~~~' EnwronmentallnfoForml clot Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4.09 PM • A-18 lnfonnat~on indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non-constroction CUP's unless otherwise requested by sfafi. • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of the site Crte all sources of mformatron (books, published rep'osrts~a^nd~oral history) /~' 1 ~ • 11) Descrbe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (arroraft, roadway Horse, etc) end how they wdl affect proposed uses• 7~i~ q'V ~L~-~J `v~/~! 7~1S wl ~ ~- nroi ~~~T ,6vv~' l~S~ vn~~ Std ; 12) Describe the proposed protect rn detail Thrs should prowde an adequate descnpbon of the site rn temis of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development fire extent of development to occur with each phase, and the ant~c-pated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary ~~s. ~ ~'.~~~i -/~r~~ ~~ ism ~~~ ~y - En~nronmentallnfoForml doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM A•19 • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, mcludmg rnformat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (res-dential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the prolect~ NO 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How rvrll these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed • ,i c,'~y T//l~.t~%J~Piyrsa,Z4yl~/ilrj"~~~~' G'~~~5 `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic frees ~O ~~ (~ ,~~ 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic wafer supplies) info which the site drains ~~~~ EnwronmentallnfoFormi doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4.09 PM • A-20 ,.---, • ~~ •, 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clari6cahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommercraUlnd (gal/day/ac) ~ Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) P~/~" 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Sepfrc Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach penolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rndreate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clafication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b CommercraUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) ~~ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential unrfs, Detached (rndreate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (rndreate whether unrfs are rental or for sale unrfs) • 21) Anticipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) lnd~cate anticipated household size by unit type • EnwronmentallnfoForm1 doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM A •21 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood contra/ agencies serwng the project been contacted to determine their abdrty to • prowde~ad{equate serv-ce to the proposed p/ro~ect~ If so, please indicate the~irre~s^ponse 33) In the known history of this propen`y, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mafenals~ Examples of hazarclous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, pest~ctdes and herbrc~des, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please Irst the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rf known f~~y ~rc~rzs No s/~ cZ~- ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ . 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, rnclud~ng but not lim-fed fo those examples fisted above ~ If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall • be shown and labeled on the application plans NO I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate eva/ua6on of fhrs project to the best ofmyabrl~ty, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I funher understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Curamonoa Date• ~ EnwronmentallnfoForml doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM • A -22 Title ~~~~~ ` ' '~~`'~/ • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON -The request to develop a 36,154 square foot industrial building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located south on Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue - APN 0229-171-23 2. Description of Project: The applicant is requesting to develop a 36,154 square foot speculative industrial building on a 1.93 acre site. The proposed building will be located along the northeast portion of the site Access to the site is via a new 35-foot wide driveway on the west portion of the site. The proposed project also includes amenities such as an outdoor bench and employee break area to further enhance the site. The proposed protect includes a dock located on the southwest (rear) portion of the site The dock will not be visible from the public right-of-way and will be located within an area covered by a roof and set back within the interior of the building Two additional dock doors are proposed along the southern portion of the building in a location that is not visible from the public right-of-way. Currently, the street frontage of Arrow Highway, which is currently paved, lacks street • improvements; therefore, the applicant will be required to install a curb and gutter, asphalt pavement to the centerline of the street, a meandering sidewalk, a drive approach, street lights, and trees, along with other improvements in the public right-of-way 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Erin Madison LTD 2240 University Drive #100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 4. General Plan Designation: General Industrial District (Subarea 8) Zoning: General Industrial District (Subarea 8) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject site is located on the southeast portion of the City on Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue. The subject site is distributed by human activity Although the site is not paved, the landscaping on-site has been modified from ats original state and undergoes routine maintenance The project area is developed with industrial uses (i e ,contractors' office/storage, outdoor storage areas, and truck/auto repair) 7. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant/industrial pipe storage; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Truck repair, General Industrial District (Subarea 8) East - Vehicle storage, General Industrial District (Subarea 8) West - Contractors' office/storage, General Industrial District (Subarea 8) 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga • Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A -23 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rina Leung Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 (/) Aesthetics () Biological Resources () Hazards & Hazardous Materials () Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities/Service Systems () Agricultural Resources (/)Cultural Resources () Hydrology/Water Quality () Energy and Mineral Resources (/)Noise () Recreation (/)Air Quality (/)Geology/Soils () Land Use/Planning () Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By ~~~ Reviewed By /dot. Date G' ~ Fl- d 7 Date ~ - ~ ~' 07 • • A •24 • C7 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially wnn Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project () () () (/) a Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Hi hwa ? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) ualit of the site and its surroundin s~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located in an area characterized by industrial and outdoor storage uses The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. The buildings in this area tend to lack design embellishment Examples of existing buildings in the area include metal buildings, converted residential structures functioning as offices, and other boxy buildings that lack articulation. The proposed building includes embellished features such as a decorative entry way, bronze reflective glazing, reveals, and sand blasted concreted panels which will enhance architectural quality of the area d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-a ricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-a ricultural uses A-25 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Signihcant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is vacant and is located in an area characterized by industrial and outdoor storage uses There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is vacant and is in an area characterized by industrial and outdoor storage uses. The nearest agricultural use is more than 3/4 mile northwest from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect: () () () (/) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air ualit Ian? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existin or ro ected air ualit violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors~ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () (/) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of peo le? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust • • • A-26 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenua~ly with Than . Sigrnficant Mitigation Signd~cant No Im act Inco orated Impact I act would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-go>ng industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAG~MD) on a protect-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCA(~MD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAGIMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. A-27 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or either suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates m Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fme Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. • A-28 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially with Than Signifcant Mitigation Significant No I act Inco orated I act Impact 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council L c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Although sensitive receptors are not adjacent to the project site, legal non-conforming, residential uses are near the project site The proposed potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect: () () () (/) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected {) () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means A-29 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially with Than . Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact I act d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurser sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation lane Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial and storage uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site; therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project, () () () (/) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeolo ical resource ursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or uni ue eolo is features d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact • :~ A-30 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially with Than Signdicant MtligaLOn Significant No Im act Incorporeted Im act Im act b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area Is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be Implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • C • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. b) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area Is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-Influence, Including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontologlcal resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The project site Is underlain by Quaternary alluvlum per General Plan Exhlblt V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be Implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 3) Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. A •31 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenually w~ch Than Signficant Mitigatwn Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Im act Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The project site has already been disrupted by discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shaking? O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse • • • A •32 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially w~ih Than significant MiLgatwn Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 4 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 7 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes is 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, is 13 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic • unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2 Soil type on-site consist of Tulunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3, which is associated with nearly level to moderately sloping soil No adverse impacts are anticipated. A -33 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than S~grnficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially with Than Signficant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3. These soils are typically highly permeable. No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal fs proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 mtles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wfldland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other m the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals • • • A-34 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially wltn Then pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Impact Impact Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy, the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy, the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The project site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. The proposed buildings are to be constructed as • speculative with no definitive users at this t>me However, at the time of occupancy, the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated • t) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 A •35 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With MrtigaUOn Than Sgnificant No Im act Inco orated Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro~ect~ () () (/) ( ) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits • L • A-36 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than SigniOcant Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources Potentially with Than g SigmScent Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act I act Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs. • Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SW PPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant will be required to submit a WQMP that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping, can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent• Construction Actwities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. C 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. A•37 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Sgniticant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Potentially with Than pp g SgniUcant Mmgation Sgnrficant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construct-on Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at feast two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to • • A •38 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mdigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact I act handle the flows The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WIMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge • Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect. No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected. • )) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City A-39 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Poten,ially wan Than Signficant MdigaBOn Signficant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is vacant and is located in an area characterized by industrial and outdoor storage uses The protect will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The protect site land use designation is General Industrial (Subarea 8) The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project. () () () (/) a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • • A-40 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison • • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than S~gmficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Potentially wan Than pp g Significant Mitigation Signrficant No Im act Inco orated Impact I act 11. NOISE. Would the project result m () (/) () ( ) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the proJect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected The proposed project includes a dock located on the southwest (rear) portion of the site. This dock will not be visible from the public right-of-way and will be located within an area covered by a roof and set back within the interior of the building, which will help to attenuate sounds associated from trucking activities Two additional dock doors are proposed along the southern portion of the building, within an area surrounded by block walls, which will serve to buffer noise to the surrounding areas b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary • sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts A -41 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgndicant With Mitigation Than Sigrnflcant No Im act Inco orated Im act Impact 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect. () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: • • A-42 • • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Potentially with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Signdicant No Im act Inco orated Impact Im act a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected. c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/act result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated w-th the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to marnta-n acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services• () () () (/) a) Fire protection? b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: a) The site would be served by Fire Station #173 located approximately 4 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could A •43 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Potentially Signficant wnh Mtligahon Than Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Im act cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has constructed a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/act: () () () (/) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require (} () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the protect site. This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project. () () (/) ( ) a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result m a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety asks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) • A-44 • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Sgnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources• Fctanually with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Impact Im act e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 252 vehicle trips daily The proposed project includes the development of a 36,154 square foot light industrial building The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each 1,000 square feet will generate 6 97 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each 1,000 square feet will generate 1 04 two-way peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Conges#ion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of building permit The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated A •45 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Sup ortin Information Sources Potentially wnh Than p g Sgndicant Mifiga4on Significant No Im ect Inco orated Impact Im act f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated. g) The pro}ect design includes, or the pro}ect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) pro}ect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's pro}ected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact Is not considered significant • • A-46 • • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources: Potantially wah Than g Signihcant Mdigahon Sigrnficant No Im act Inco orated Impact 1 act d) The protect is served by the CVW D water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect. No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capaaty to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are antiapated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wtldlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street >mprovements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare speaes would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overndfng Considerations for sfgnfffcant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to A-47 Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially wnn Than . Signficant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Impact I act less-than-sigrnficant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. • • A-48 • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00692 -Erin Madison EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no si nificant environmental effects would occur. i nature: `~'' ~ . /~ S 9 Date: ~ ZGr ~ Print Name and Title: • f~- A-49 :7 - J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 Public Review Period Closes: August 8, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Erin Madison Project Location (also see attached map): Located south of Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue - APN 0229-171-23 Project Description: A request to develop a 36,154 square foot industrial building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: • The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but. (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 70500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE • The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. August 8, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By A •50 RESOLUTION NO 07-48 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 36,154 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8), LOCATED SOUTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN PECAN AVENUE AND HICKORY AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-171-23 A Recitals 1. Erin Madison LTD, filed an application for the approval of Environmental Assessment Development Review DRC2006-00692 fora 36,154 square foot industrial building, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 8th day of August 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 8, 2007, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue - APN 0229-171-23, and b The property is located in an area developed with industrial and outdoor storage uses; and and and c. The project consist of the development of a 36,154 square foot industrial building, d The project design is compatible with the existing development m the nearby areas, e. The project complies with the development standards m the Municipal Code and • General Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 A-51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 2 and 2 above the Plannin Commission hereb finds and concludes as follows• • 9 Y a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed protect is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed protect, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mturious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the • imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it finds. (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigation Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 A -52 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Director hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) A detail of the decorative paving at the entrance shall be shown on the Construction plans 2) A Detailed Landscaping Plan shall be shown on the Construction Plans depicting the location, size, and species 3) A detail or elevation of the steel gate shall be shown on the Construction Plans. The steel gate shall be painted to match the building 4) The outdoor employee eating area(s) shall be covered with a decorative trellis shade structure; a screen a wall minimum of 3 feet high should surround the eating area(s), tables, chairs, and the trash receptacles 5) All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have a light pointed downwards to . avoid glare 6) All equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened and architecturally compatible with the elevation design from the view of the surrounding properties and the public rights-of-way. The Edison transformer location shall be shown on the Construction Plans and screened with mature landscaping. 7) Electrical panels shall be located inside a cabinet within the building. 8) All downspouts on the building shall be inside walls of the building 9) The paint scheme shall be m compliance with the approved colors by the Design Review Committee 10) All signs require permits for the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to fabrication. 11) Lighting fixtures shall not exceed the height of 25 feet tall Engineering Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be widened in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including, but not limited to. • • Curb and gutter 36 feet south of the street centerline, asphalt pavement to centerline of the street, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500-lumen HPSV streetlights, commercial drive approach, A•53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 4 .~ street trees, traffic striping and signage and drainage facilities as determined necessary. Provide additional widening on the north side of Arrow Route sufficient to install alert-turn lane for the project driveway Install pavement transitions within the existing rights-of-way, both east and west of the project site, with asphalt curbs to contain street runoff that extend to adjacent drive approaches. Remove the existing walls and other private improvements from street right-of-way Reestablish private improvements beyond right-of-way as needed. Provide pavement transitions off-site east and west to loin with the existing pavement. Obtain permission to remove and reconstruct the existing wall fronting Arrow Route on the property to the east. This is required in order to clear the wall from interfering with the proposed right-of-way, proposed street improvements, and pavement transition Alternately, we may stop the curb and gutter at the east property line and transition to join the edge of the existing drive approach to the east This will be determined during plan check and resolved to satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) On-site mitigation facilities are subject to the approval of the Building Official. Any alternate proposals to drain to a public facility are subject • to City approval • Address emergency drainage overflow that may occur when the water flows off this project property onto the properties to the south and obtain emergency overflow easements from same 3) Installing frontage improvements on Arrow Route will concentrate flows in the gutter that discharges to the vacant property at the west property line This will need to be mitigated either on-site or within the existing rights-of-way to the west 4) Provide for a future driveway access to the west with reciprocal access easement If shared access easement in favor of future development on properties to the west is not provided, then the driveway may need to be moved to center of site 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded at the same time 6) Development is within area 10 of the Etiwanda/San Savaine Drainage • Policy Area Developments of less than 5 acres will not be required to construct the storm drain facilities specified for area 10 developments A-54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 5 Area 10 developments of less than 5 acres will, however, show that they are protected from possible flooding and if necessary construct any and all interim and ultimate facilities needed to protect it Also, pay the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan Drainage Fee 7) Prior to obtaining a grading permit, the WQMP shall be 100 percent complete to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan at time of Grading Permit. 8) The applicant shall address emergency water overflow that may occur when the water flows off the subject property onto the properties to the south Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to . erosion over extended periods of time A-55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 6 • • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soil haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative • fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters • A -56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO. 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 • Page 7 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• • Enact interim measures to protect designated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological site within new developments, using their special qualities a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit on a copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant for animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has • completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find A-57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 8 • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilzing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emission associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Qualify Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion form the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a • remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame A •58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO. 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 9 • 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge ofdebris orsedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm event and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The Developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaping areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate converge and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan • (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards • specified in the Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in the Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the A-59 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO 07-48 DRC 2006-00692 -ERIN MADISON August 8, 2007 Page 10 Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the • Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST• James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2007, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES' COMMISSIONERS. NOES• COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• • A-60 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL-ASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00692 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A •61 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2006-00692 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the proiect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term proiect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities atthe project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • A -62 • • • a O J _Q H Z C Y W 2 rU~ V Z LOL 1~ cZ G Q ~_ G ~ °o ~ N W ~ d C C ~ v Q ~ a o J o ~, N ~ U .a 0 Q Z a Q> >' V N Q~ (Q a rf,` ~~ ~~t,'\r n • Asa ,u , • i ~?~~ e ~'a,` N N ~ N ~''`; ~~ i-~ ;a ~ri,~ ~s~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ TY ` ~~~ 6 • ?I~, x ~ x~„ • ~~1 :~ • ,, . ~y ~~, ~, U U U ~ a U a a a ~ ,,, ~ h c c c c c ~~ cts ctf c~ c~ c~ • ;~ a a a a a • 0 0 0 0 0 m m ~ '~' a>i ai ai a>i ~ ~a e,s-n. m m ~ m m ~. ., i;~i3 ; U U U m U '~p *- x 5' 5-,.. ~y ~H • • i ~T ry , u~'+' ~~,~e ~;- p s 0 m 0 • , y ~ ~ ; ~.~;: ~ ~ d m m ,FS -= r ~'y~ , y "O ~ ~ y O O C~ C C L N >, 'D N C N C >, ~ L O _~_ O CO U O "= "O L N r O O ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ O Q U _ L ~~.,t y , ~ r C~ U~ ~~ 0 N y Q~ Q ~ N N L ~ U ), f't ` ' -p O_ N~ O ~ O ~ ~ C O O C ` L - ` O >, ~ fn C/) O .~ ~,. av ~ ~ O O Q N +r ~ O~ ~ .0 O O V ~~~' i~ O O >, O~ C C O L ~ >, O ~~ ~ 3 C O ;~>,~; (~ C O N > Ems- o_~ ~ C O. O N CLS O to Y--~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ U ~ N ('~ ~ EQ E ~ >, a M ~,~ i N `~ S O N ~ _ ~ O C~ O~ ~~ L U O 't E >. O t~y,.r;, ,~ '~`` ; s ~ o aci ~ - ~ CC Q ~ci ~ `o iq d ~ ~ ~ c o c oy-p~coQ ~ -o o n. ~~~n ~ o co ~ ° ~ rn-po , C .- r, E~ CO c rn _ N y ` N -O O >, Q = O~ w - `O ~ E O ss ' _a ~a~~-aU O E ~ cup- cEQC~ -p L ay~ o ~ cti v~ ~. c m Qua ~ !r1' ~, ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y " ~ ~ Q " ~ Q ~ ~ j • ,;a,°'- C~F- a-to ~. ~ (0 ate O~ y_ - O ~ - O_ O ~ ~ ~ O -~ C~ >O i O C ~ ~ C O ~ .fir 7 "" ~ "O W ~ C O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ (4 O E' ~% O O O H C ~ °>o~c~~ »r `' N O O f/J av~aci~acic'~o~~~a> .Or C 'O E c~C~? .r C/) ~ i N N ~~ '~ ~ c ~ic~m~ °o~ EcE-°'ro»~ cc~NO a~ - ~ a~ - (~ ; - O~ h y C C~ U O C~~ C i O O O- N O_ N In f~ C O> C O~ O O C fS$ C C Q O ~ ,C C L O y (C N O O (n U N 7 . , -~~? Q o aEi ° E~ ° ~~-a a~i a>> a~i ~U E~~ Q maw ~ Q °c QoC A-63 0 T • ~: . . • N N N N ~ d' ~ ~ ~ ~ cY ' a a s a Q Q Q Q Q Q a N y ~ U y y C Cif + a fC a CO s CS! a CC a o 0 0 0 o ~ Q- • ~ U ~~ U Q) i ~ Q) w U CA ~ (~ O O N > U > N > N > > C~ C C y i f. fn C C C~ C C~ ~ N N ~ O ~ O ~ N ~ O ~ C O O DU C 0 0 DU 7 0 DU C O O Dv C C 0 0 DU > N ~ U U U U U U U U U U U . . O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m ~ _ ~ N `~ o0 " C a a U 0~0 ~ ~ ^ .s_ _ O !q _~ O ~a?_~c C aco C O c CC ~ O ~ C 7 O L L fn O (0 v O L U L CC C0 ~ C ~ O U ~ E ~ do ~ .o upi ~ ~ ~ c c E -° m ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ O ~Qd ~ m m Q v ~ U ~ ~ U "C N ° ~ ~ a O -Oa ~ cA ~ ~ cUU c`tS m ~ ~ ~ o ~ > ~ N N O ~ ~ U p 7 Q a N~ O~ ~ p O O O C L i ` O ~ C C U O C L y ~ >. ~~~ >, .- O L P L N N .L . tq a N U > U O Q O C C L N p L~ C~ a O a C _ o ~' o m~ ~ °c' ~ ~ ~'o ~ ~ ~ °-~ ~ ~~ dam ~~ N >-~ ? m i. `- ~ >' C .,_, C O C O N -p ` O .a f>s C C O LC') ~ U (~ O > O "-' 'a L CSS O O C~ i Q ~ O L _a U ~ O ~ ~ O y ~ p ~ U p ~ m ~ N Q ~ ~ p ~ v ~ p ~ a ~ ~ O f0 uj U O - - ~ U U p N - i N ~ CO U (4 ~ ~ U- U O o > > a c ~ + O O ~ ~ ~ O p > > U ~ ~ _ U i- >, O - O C N ~ X ~ ~ OU U Q L O ~ ~ U N C - co O .r C O ~ -O _>' ~ tQ U fC _ ?i Q. C Y _U N > '~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ O 01 d CC Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O V O ~ O ' Q. O- a O C (~ X a N O O N D7 U C O-~ >, C ~ ~ C» CII O ~ y~ p~ a E M ~ ~ d L - c~ O tll ~ ~~ ~ - ~ O C d O ~ -fl L CO ~ ~ O ~ O N C a O C C N N O _ U U L ~ V ~ d Q a O ~ C Cif 1~ C U 0 L d1 ~--' C ~? Cn C~ LL N CO O O L L o CA N U O Cis N ~ 7 O O O ~ to O Q. a to O ~ a O O ~ ~ Q p) ~ O O ~ N C Q O CA d 7 ~ .`. L N~ _ U - O C Cn ~ ~ ^ ,`. N N N ~ > O ~ ~ O Y ~ Q' o a 0 ~ U °~ L O R ~ > O ~ Q. ~ ~ C- ~c_6 ~ L Cd U O cn c O ~ m L~ ~ U N> o i CL ~ c u d ~ ~ cn a~ ~ ~ c~ a> , o cn ~ ~ 1- U U cn ~ c/) ~ ro ~ ~ L ~ ~ a ~ o a ~ ~ U ~ d o ~ L ~- ~~ ° ~~ ~~ ~ m H v°~ ~ ° ~ U ~ c6 ~ H as O N A-65 u~xi~ • .~~'~ p • ~~~4 ; , -~~;, qty" , g, N ~. ~ mot' N C1 N N ~ M ~~ i°1 i'ye~t ~ • r i ~ M ,; ~' • x S_ ~~ ' a Q a o o U U ., a O N y N y N ~ ~ (0 c~ f~ CO CC (0 f~ d Q. o. a Q a a Q ~ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '• ~~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ` ~ i a a i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~, ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ 53'x' sr`r~^~~ • W , _ • U U U U U U U U O ;:;z m ~ a;~ .ni ~ Y ~o fA "p _m m ~ "O o i ~ O o m ~ ~~ m "C7 ~~ ~-T~~~'" ~ m = C ~ m ~°°~ ~ C In mo_ ~ a» ~ C ~ ca LC') .cm LC) m ~ a ', ~ cC L m _~ O ~~ ~ j LL ~ ~ SOm ~ 0 ~ SQL (B !n ~o 50.i j._ N a ` ~ O = UO~Om~ ~ ~ L ~, ~ m ao- a 3~ ~.m~ ~ m -a ~ ~ j c Q~ c~ ~~ m 0 ~ v~ ~ m~ ~ ~ o - ~ ~~° ~ m e `~ ~ m~~ y m~ c o m o~ v o~ c a ~ c E m m ~ ~ ~ y cC O c0 RS U C _~ U 'O ..0. i ~ O ~ m O rn O ~ 3 C ~ _ CSS O y '~ y m C a~ m f~ C O G3 m "" L U C C m (C U m `~ ~ ~ O fLS O fIS U U CSS ~+ m L !n C y to m m~ o ~ m m m i . cn~ N in a O ~~ ~ ~~~j ~ a~U m m ' ~ q ~ _ m 6 L i ~ m C tSS t !A N ~ to ~ m c~ C ' c~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ t L ~ cUC ~ ~ ct3 0 0 `° a v 6 ~ m v ` -a ~ n. ~ .c N ~ ~ f ~' N vi ~ ~ ~ ~ c0 cC cn `o ~ C ~ m~~ m; 1 C L C m 0 _ ~ m C y m 7~ ~ a C ~ ~ .«'C• ax;~+ ° ,~M... , C O ~ ` O m C ~ C O RS f2 U O c0 ~ L m ~ L U L ~ - ~ ~ m O ~ ~ ~ O m , , ;:a°r, " U Q ~ ~ m O -p O _ ~ ~ _~ C m °- c ~ ~ m O E _o O E - ~ O E as '~ >, O N U ~ c U ~ ~;, ~f~ ' a r, ~ ~ o- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ami ~ ~ > C ~ m Y U U U ~ U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ d -r ~ ` (,) i ~ ~ a O ~ O ~ i m ~C Y ~ ~ "O ~ m ~ O _ ~ C -O cC O ~ ,sU -p Y O ~ ~ ~ O U y m ... ~ O U U fn ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y C y ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ` ~ .', `IL.,, ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ U O ~ i~ i ~~~ o ~m a ~m c ° ~m X ~ cnmm ~' ~ ~nmm , a~ ~ ~ :~~ " >,c~m`m c c `~ cm~m m ni c o ` c p ~ cm m ~ = , r_~ , c oo >~ win~m L o a~ ~UU - ~ m Q°'a - m Qn. - o m QED - o a~ ¢Eo - ~ ~ ¢~L - ~ ai Q~3 „~ rC ) f ~ ~ ~ ~ m ca acts . . • ~ • c~ • A-66 • . . . ~ v v ~ r~ r~ co co ~ v . • ' a a s a a a a ° a Q ° ` Q ~ a~ E a m a E • 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ~ ~ ~ ~ m a i a~i a~i m ai a~i ai ~ m ~ m m m . . • U U U U [0 m . • • O O O • m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ m ~p ~ o~ m~ c ~ c~ 3 `~.~ ° ° `~~ o~ ~.~ c -- -°c~ °~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ W a° o ~ o~ Q ~ c~o~oo~~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ E c °U ~ ~ °-~E o ° E O ~ °' ~ '' LO o VO y 'O ~ ~ O ~ N C fl v i O ~ ~ ~ ~ E Q ~ w > p O tU ~ O cn . .. _ ~ j CSS O_ . _ E O C_ -O ~ ~ a~ ~, ~ ~ ~ _y E ~ O O _ ~ ~ ~ E ~ N _ ~ U ~ ro ~ y C~ ° ~~ ° C C Q ~ o o L C N D O ` cC ~a,o Q_L ~ ~ C C N °" C O A L ~ ° p O y C O N ~ ~ > U O ~ U c O ~ ~ CLS ~ C O ~ _ p N fB to E m ~ E N ° C ~ , dj ~ C O_ f- ~ ~ ~ `° -O - i ° ~ L ~ O > ~ p ~ ~ ~ _ O ~ y Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ y ~ ~ to ~' ~ CJ N U U ~ O L ~ . ~ O ~ Q ~ "~ 'a CO C ~ ~ i y >, ' O L- O Q - _ C ~ E »- U ~ Q_ (0 ~ ~ fC O~ L ~ ~ N .C N O _ O p j~ 0~ ~ Y ~ "° ~ V O U~ O~ O~ C C ~ CO U p C~ to O ~ O° E ~ 0 0- 7 p L O p o ~ ° ~ ca ~~~ E ~ v 0 3 ~ ~ c~ ° a N ~ ~ L ~ - V ~ iv a ~o ~ CC to Cn ~ ~ c _ L ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ o D) ~ C .~. ~ fl. C ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ i O CO C p0 O U _ O ~ E pUj ~ = = y U ~ O ~ ,~~-, ~ ~ ~ ~- L ~ ~ Q- ~ C ~ ~ ~ E L a~ ° ~ ° C ~ (~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~- c0 ~ ~ o O~ E ~ cC~ °L a~ a~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ E o~ ~ ~ > ~ °' ~ ° °-E ~ yam' ~ E _ ~-`~ a, Qca ~ - co g>aE ~ U -a ~ o ~ v ~ am ~~ Qro `o¢ ca ~ ~ ~ ~ QO ~ " ¢ m E-o ~ a ~ a i • -~~°QCLnu°i-Ec°a~° . 0 ~' A-67 anhw { 3 E • (-i~-''~~''~ '?g ~ t ~ c0 M '' ~-Yy ~ ~ d' ~ ~ ',', _t M1 ~j ki ~~ I~'!y~ 4^S fi -.P ~° ~,a}. "~1 i 'fin' * ~ ~ ~ ' `+t r w +~ "1 V ; ' Y ~~r • _ ~ ' ^~ `~ a~f,r,4 ' ~ ~~ a o o ' Q Q ~ Q n ~~~ s ~; '1` } , h p Q p a p a Ty,Y ~ ws f ~4w ~ ~ ~ ~ C C C C ~ - • • O O O '^ O U O U O U O U ~ ~ O) i Cn ~ O) ~ ~ O N N , ~ ~ !~ ~ N ~ fA ~.~ ij °` i N ~ ~ ~ N ~ + C ~ ~~ ~ C ~ U C ~ U C ~ ? ~ U fin, ~ =~4 ~ f _ ,~ k • [0 ~ ~ ~ ~'~ U U U U ' -,:;,, • ~P'r'; ",' ~, e, ~ x T , ~Fx ~ • • IT ~ ,.~ y+ i~~,ry ~ O • ~ ^ °t ~Y ~~~ ~ r O O O O f S 1 J ~y ~ ~ W / /~ I.L /~ / LL ,~ ~~ s n'` ~y ~ W y~ W ~y ~ W y~ W °'J`t n N O O L i .--. i0 O O O fi7 ,.~', U `'' Ns ~~ N~ C (C o 0 ~ N N C O " 9~ CO CO ~ ~ (~ O "O ~' p „ ~ = CLi O O O RS +~ O ~~A U U CO ~ ~ ~ O ~ tOn C~ O O ~ ~ W U C ~'. Q O~ ~ ~ O O~ N ' C N ~ E Q` O ~ ~ E , ' " C "O O ~ O ` ~ -p m O O ~ ~ O U L d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O C Q p O ~ ~ N ~ ~o~-o-a mcco . ~U~ ` ~ ~U~ m U ~ ~ C U~UO ~ c -a U ~ ~ ~-° ~ o °~ ° ` E ` o.Cin U aE ~- c~~ ui~~ ~ O c`v Q ~ ~a ~ ~ . c v~ o~ o c ~ U m ~ ~ U Q ~ ~ ~ o w m ~~m _ _ '~ ao c vii ~ ~ ca o m~ a> ~ ~ ~ c a~i o aN ~ ~~ - c - RS ~ Cn ,Y _ ~ C ` ~ ~ Q Q- , fA V (A to o - CO L '~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ O (C ~ s ~ ~ (A 0 o .^ i ~ ' '~°~{ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ -a ~ N ~ ~ ~ O C 'a E ° O ~ o ° o ~ ~ a~ mL ~ o o E.~ m Qom , ~ ;~. o L m a O o _ , ~ ~.rL~ c n m ~ a - o °-..y O ` ~ y ~- p O ~ O d O >, ~ "" C '~,+ ~ .« `-' O ~ ~ 'n (L! O L L ~ U yp ; ~~w U ~ • N "O .L-, Q c~ C "O ~ - (C p ~ E a t~ ~ s -.~ N ~ ~ O ~ c ~ ~ N ~ ~. ~ O ~ N ~n N ~ ~ 0 ~'~y , _ _ C +~ ~ C , - C ~ 7 C O ~ ~ N , ,tn~~ L ~ ~ ~ n- ~ L C N N U E ~ C N ~ _ L ~ C ~ `~', p C ~ ~ = U ~ O t~ N ~ ~ Q 7 p ~ ~ O ; C() ~' __ (SS O (~ O >+ ~ ~ U cL6 N ~ 7 ~ C io -O O _ ~ CC ~ _ ~ E `~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V - ~ p C ~ ~ ~ N Q cC ~ E 'CS ; C ' N C~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ fq f~9 ~ ~ N N N O fl. U .«. O ~ ~ _o ~ to C ' Cd O ~ L (n ~ ~ in ° >, a ~ ca c += p E co >, ~ ~ N O (~ CO _ _ C d ~ m o m ° ' ~ ,o~, L L o, ~ o cn o a~= ~U ~ o ~ O ~~ ccU ~ ~ o ~ cnU U~ ,o, y ~U~ ~ ~C~ ~~ ~ ~ o c c_ ~~ U ~ ~ E(~ a, ,o ~, o ~, y L ~ ~ o cc o L ^ ^ ^ _ LJ _ f ~ I..L ~ L _ L.L (n Q) O ~ V ~ U LL LC L 1 .7 ~• A-68 • C • . . N N N (~ N 'a a a a a N a a a a n m 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 i a m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ D m U U U m m [D m . . m ' m m m U c E?'~ ~o O o~~ c ~ ~ ~~mo o~~ ~~ ~ O C U td ~ ~ ° N ~-o o N C c a~ c - U L ._. Q~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Qo~ ~ o _~~ ~- o ~ N m~ L N ~ °~ ~n t s ~~~ Rf - N Q. ~ A RS Q. ~ "-' ~ L C fA m 0 _E O~ cn O U Q C a 0~ .~ "" Q O 7 O ~ -C C O -C > E O >~ m ~ C C O C O U -O O N O X~ -O O O p ~ C y C O E N O ~ a Q a y~~ ~ .~ ~ O~ N~ O c~ ~ U a~ ~ O in 7~~ O ~ N~ N O N (~ d U Q. ~ L a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 O ~ O ~ C 0 ~ > > ~ (~ U " ' O~ U O ~ N 'O 0 0 a U O N_ i O' O O C ~ O ~ Q y 0 m v~ "-' ctf ~` ~ N ~ ~~ O_ C O ~ O _ (n ~ ~ U N O ~ O~ O U (0 C p C O~ C O ~' ~ VJ •~~. > ~ O -O O O U~ ~ fT3 ~ d C a ~ ~~~ (lS Q ~ ~ y O~ C!1 C N~ O ~ N Q E N O p m ~ O C 0 O ~ Q- O ~ ~ O ~ U C CiS - ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ C "O ~ ~ ~ ~ f4 "_ (0 ~ ~ N ~ '~ O N U L Q O ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~-a~~a>cQ C Q . d C O N . ,~ cts-°~nc ~ U~~~E Y O ,._ -ov,o ~ ~ . ~ m Q LA U E~c~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ° O ~ ~ ~ ? X ~ a U O C Q- ~ ~ O -C -O ° f0 C ~ p C U ~ ~ ~ U (d i i O~ Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L C O O ~ ~ CO ~ C 7 ~~ C ~ O C C O _ to ~ C~ to O O~~ U U D p ~_ C O Q O ~ O (0 y= p L i CC O Q O N ~~ p~ O~ ~ 7 ~ ~ C RS r= ISS y~ C 0 U 0~~ Q O O p ~~?~ O d O ~ i c~ ~ N ~ ..~ CO O O ~ U ~ ~ W 7 ~ O U O Q CCl ~ ~ ~ C N cu C - _ _ O C~ C Li C R5 C ~ _ _ U _ W U O ~ ~ ~ C~ -O ~' C ~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ U f~ ~ ~ -C (LS > ~ ~ > ? ~ > d ~ > ~ N OU ~ Q ~ Q y co f- E ~ ~ C U ~ ~ y QSa~c >~ C ~ ~ ~ ~f -c'~ O _O ~ ~ D _ ~ O O >. ~ . n UCtsQ f- QN O A-69 -_;,,, ~Si„~ ~ n' • • ~~~'~w ~ Y~ • ~ ~ Cf' N N N ~ ,?;~ i -c ' a_E. ~ __-' 'a 1 = `.a M143 ~~ • • ~~ ' U U v: a a a ^ a ~~~ Q ~_,.~ _Q _~ a f o • O O O ~i; p~ U > > ~ i~~ ~~~ C ~ ~ ,~ ,d U ~, • ~ ~ Q U \ U U ,: m m `m ' U • ~ • m 1 i m m U O O~ O O (~ O~ ,~, C N ` y~ N~ c~ O (0 d 0 ~- O C L ~ ~ ~ .C C~~ C to T~ (0 ~ N ~- i _ N y (0 ` C p ~~ ~ m C O N N ~ d "' - S U~~ C >~ L O) U C - ` ~ ~ ~ C O O C N Rf O c0 U ` O to ~ ~' ~ N O ~ C ~ O O !A ,.- (S [C ~ C 'O E = C C ~ Q >, N > y RS O O O- O- O C3 O m L ~ ~ ~ m ~ .~ ., ' O Y >, O N cts ~ ~ ca O o~ O ~~- v ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ E ow ~ ° ,.~ ~ ~ ' ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o ~ te ~ > O ~ ao c ~ ~ a~ o _ o v~ ~cin~s0 c w a~ -- -° o i,, ,ti , , °^-f'; ; a~ c c~ . e O ~ ~ cc ~ ~ ~ ~ G G = ~ ~ f ~ O O ~ L ~ ~ ~ Z 4r ~, 1 ~ O C m -o ~ ~ °-~ ~ ~ °' ~' "-" o~ ~~p ~QU N ~ ~_ZZ E"-' ~ EL ~ 0 .,o m w _ Q_E o a~ ~ c ~ c .n (0 C6 E m O_(0 (~ E ~ i c C .,~ ~ .Y ~ i U J N C~ O N `O fry L N O_ ?~ ~ CLf L E i C `O = ca O ~"'" N O O y cA O ~ v N .r O ~ E O N O -p O- C N~~ C i s' ~ O O C7 N uj ~~ C - E~ O N O O ~ O Z >+ fl. ~ Q~ N O U 'O ~ .n O O L J+ O W - O ~ _' J, C~ ~ C ~ ~O C~ ~ O ~ ~~ N~ O Cif p) ,~ cSf _ ` fl- L tt1 i O) O N O ~ O c V ~ y p N O C N RS ~' O ~ O O p J ~ O ` O ~ ~~ c ~,Eoccco ~ O W--~v~~c~'cm O p ~c?a~-'~~pvOV= ~,_- C E c~-oa~-a~~°~o o>,~~~n--o~c~C oa~cEo EoE ~ a~ ~ ~ °- ' c a. ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ X ~ c ca > = Cn p - z ~ ~ °W U~ w K ' o ° ~ ro °i ° a~a~~~o.~ p~Q-O- O Eca ~~~~Qa i~ ~n O O. ~ ~c c C~C O y~0 O (n ,r~;,', , o~ C~ O (~ ~ Q O C 0 ~ O~ = c6 N ~ ~~ `}~r `~~~ 0 ~ to 0 0 0 0 N m E~ - ~O ~ C i~ j E ~~~E 0 0 f0 ~ U O U~ i c o~-c ' ~ ~c _ _ E~ Ob O C > ~ y mcu ~E ~ ~ 0 ~ (0 Lin ~-_ in U ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ CO ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~~ C ~ O O CO O N C N J U~ L N~ E t a ~ V c N N O ~ to c~ ~ E~~ o~ U n t O ~~ O ~ U OC O -° m U r;Z " U r C C ~' ~Y • O• • A -70 • • • • • • • ~ ~ Q • • Q Q Q ~ O C O C O _ U ~ i D) i d7 i C y C y C~ ~ C D U i C U ` ~ ~ D D U U U U • • O m ~ ~ m +L-" ~ C N N ~ ~ L > ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ O p _ ~ N O d y O >i C ' C O ~ L L CC L CQ C~ O N O~ CA Q f~ Rf O X ~ ` ~ N ~ O ~ O N ~ `~ > O O ~ ~ O CD O- ~ ~ C N ~ d ~ > ` U _V "" ~ ~ ~ " _ ~ O N O . O C ~ N ~ ~ y C ~ O C O U C O O O O - ( O O C (~ Q~ Q -C Cd ~ N O~~ L ~ L C> O O C Cn 0 7 N O X~ to " a C O~ ~ U ~ ~ O C ~, O O O ~ N X y .C C L O 'O f~ •O O~ O fn ~ fA C U N _ Q~ O >, L C N .C - > L w O _ O y ~ ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ Y (0 ~ O ~- ~ d O ~ 'p U O Q +~ rn O ~ C ~ O N ,.. cn C ~ L ~ C O - ~ . -' N ' ~ O Q 0 0~~ C ..•. !n ~ 0 0 V •O O y~ - O - .a C O y~ O ~ ~ C to y fn C U ~ C O (O ~ N 7~ C 0- ` O ,_ a co C 0 0 C .r L L ~ y c~ O ~, r 0 O E _ O CrCO~"= U !q N ~ ` ~ N ~ ~~ U ~"~ O ~ ~ L - O N N~ ~ O~ C> O cC ~ ~ ,~ y L »-~ O~ .~ O .'C--. U O N O U .C O O N >, C O~ C d O a U y ~ ~~ ~ O ~ (~ O r >. O O C "•" C (~ CLS LL.., _ > O ~ >. N CO O c~ - C c c u°~• ~ ~ c~~ o~U~_o•i a~ c ago ~~a ~ : ~~ O y 0 N> o~ O L y~ y ~ y E ~~~ L O~ ~ O~ Ci3 •a N Q O O~ Q i 'a ~ "d !n ~ L C (n j 0 0 ~~ U C N in •O N O N N O O 'O m 'a .... 'O Q. O cn •O C C ~ c6 Q - _ O ~ ~ ~ p O O ~ ~ ~ N cC4 ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ O U fSS C06 -C ~ O N ~ . U y r Q C U .fl y N fn .'C.. fn ~ (p I- Cif = L J C L C~ O. U~ y A•71 3 '~ ~ € U ~ N a (C ~ C ~ C w ~ " O 7 O N c CO ~ c O p N m ro ~ ~ U ~ O u aUi 'D c° w m o o d [L C'3 U Y a ~ ~~ ` ~ s a ~ •o t o ~ a> ~ c a~ c xp~ ~.,~., Y Y ~ o. o o > 0 _m ji%~ ~ ~ ~ cA 2 ~ U F '§~~, ~ r N CO ~ y y !~ '.M ~`t t,Y ~J ~3 .t ~y r ~ ' n F ` - ~ _ w " a - t O tq ` ` o. 'C ¢ o- p° rt+ ~ , ~~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ . ,': ~ a1. ~ T ~ `~: s ts0, c m Q ~ L m ~ b'~ o ~ ~ ~ D' c r ~ a a ' ;~,~ ~ O O ~ c n ti~'; Q m U ~ t~ ` C s a [;~ O O SC,' c~; N ~ C p U O t'LT, ~ i c G7 3 ... O c ,LL Z ~ c U ~ C ~ U ° a v~ . ~ o . C '~ w F - ~' O o m C L ~ O n. ~ C O d O Q [0 U O W N N C ~ ~ N N _ O `o ~1 ~ o ~ a~ c N c O7 N E `~ a c °' m a 0 o~ ~ ~ ~ m 0 0 (/) 61 > O o N 'D O ~ O C m y N ~ U O ~ C y a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ , O ~ ° :O E ~ m m U °~ ~= o c w ~ ~ U U m ~' ~ ~ O 'Q ~ d U m o d ~ o o w 0 0 0 LC U d U m 4. lL 0 d .~ Q Y V d L U O d Y O 00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2006-00692 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: ERIN MADINSON LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE - APN: 0229-171-23 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPL Y TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-48, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project Ali checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- A -72 Protect No DRC2006-00692 B. Time Limits Development Review approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Flre Marshal regulations have been compiled with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 6 A detailed on-site lighting plan, Including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 9 All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, Including proper Illumination. D. Shopping Centers Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally 2 Completion Date -/-/~ -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- _/_/ -/~~ _/_/~ -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A •73 Project No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included in building• plans. • 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and _/_/_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/ /_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. ~. Trip Reduction 1. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/~/_ non-residential development 2. For industrial projects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be _/_/_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Bicycle Transportation Plan adopted by City Council Resolution No. 02-237. Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be sufficient. H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting shall be prepared by a licensed _/_/_ landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building • 3 1 \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A-74 Protect No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5.1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be • installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows• one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft, of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained In healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included In _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along the front yard area 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/~ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Sig ns 1. The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to Installation of any signs J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant Is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the Issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit K. Oth er Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _/_/~ 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A-75 Protect No DRC2006-00692 mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mallboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance • of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. a Site/Plot Plan; b Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including Isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2006-00692) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and Clty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for Information and submittal requirements M. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2006-00692). The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to 5 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- A-76 Protect No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date the Building and Safety Department prior to permits Issuance 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. Monday _/_/~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be Installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" Instructions _/_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attics in Ime with common walls _/_/_ 5 Roofing materials shall be Class "A." _/_/_ 6 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/_ fire-resistive construction. 7 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 _/_/_ 8 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/ /_ O. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Buliding Code, City Grading _/_/~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall _/_/_ occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 50 FEET total feet on ARROW ROUTE / / _ -- • 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A-77 Protect No DRC2006-00692 Q. Street Improvements • 1. Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to• Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drrve Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trait Other Arrow Route X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item. (e) Drainage facilities to maintain flows within existing right-of-way to ioin with existing flood control facility Improvement Plans and Construction. a. Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights • on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 I, feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer • 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc Completion Date -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- A-78 Project No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shalt be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size l]ty. Arrow Route Lagerstoemia Crape 3 feet 20 feet 24 FIII indica Tuscarr Myrtle Hybrid "Pink" O.C inch in box Construction Notes for Street Trees. 'Fill in Quantity on plans 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. R. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer, or BuildingOfficial 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required. -~-~- • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • _~-/. -~-~- -/-/ -~-~- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A-79 Project No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ • Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a point use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of _/_/_ building permits, whichever occurs first, for Arrow Route 2 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from • landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. 5. Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Auto CAD (computer aided design) format. If public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ • 9 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond 8-8 doc A-80 Project No DRC2006-00692 Completion Date V. Security Hardware 1. One-Inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be Installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/~ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be _/_/_ a minimum of three feet In length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department X. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm If needed Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and In turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • ~o I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00692Std Cond S-8 doc A-81 i M,.~~~~:. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District .,~, ~~- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS April 18, 2007 PCA Architectural Design Group Erin Madison, LTD Arrow Rancho Park (1) Industrial Buildings DRC2006-00692 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the con-espondmg standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required • fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. A •82 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed • is 2125 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the Califomia Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an ovefiead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 5 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 6. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 7. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. The Califomia Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a building permit are required Prior to the installation of the fire alarm • system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 2 A-83 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access • Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire Distract access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. • g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4 Access Walkways. Handscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates. Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road • shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply 3 A •84 a. Prior to the fabncation and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final . acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open honzontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motonzed or manual d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of dnve access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00. f. Motonzed gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h Motonzed gates shall be equipped with a Knox ovemde key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. For motonzed gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief poor to installation Bi-directional or • multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distnct standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B8~S for plan review 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the extenor walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aenal ladder b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with constnaction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration • 4 A-85 d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard • e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) • FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogerncs • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Magnesium Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems • Fruit Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings 5 Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards A •86 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bemardino County Fire Department shall review your Business • Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building 8~ Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan Califomia Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous matenals disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 2001 Califomia Budding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. • FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections • 6 A•87 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. • 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Constnuction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to pertorm the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services • 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 A •88 The fire spnnkler morntonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be • inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC8~R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. • Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11. Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12 Confidential business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13 Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • 8 A •89 Stiff Report DATE: August 8, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18579 - DOUG GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide Building C, one of the buildings of a three-building office/commercial complex of about 4 acres that is under construction, into 19 units for condominium purposes in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 6, of the Haven Overlay, located at the west side of Haven • Avenue about 330 feet north of 6th Street - APN: 0209-262-19. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP99-53. This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301(k) Existing Facilities. BACKGROUND: The subject office building is Building C of athree-building office/commercial complex that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 2000, (Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP 99-53). The complex consists of the subject office building, a convenience market/gas station (Building A), and a fast food restaurant (Building B). The complex is on two parcels (Parcels 5 and 6 of Parcel Map 7731); the subject building is on Parcel 5 of this map. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Office buildings; Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay South - Vocational school; Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay East - Office buildings; Industrial Park (IP) Distnct (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay West - Industrial warehouse building; Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 6) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Industrial Park North - Industrial Park • South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18579 -DOUG GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES August 8, 2007 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The office/industrial complex is generally rectangular m shape and is about 661 feet deep (north-to-south) by 264 feet wide (east-to-west) with an area of about 4 acres. Construction of the buildings and the associated improvements is underway. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide Building C into 19 condominium units. The three-story subject building is about 32,000 square feet m floor area while Parcel 5 is about 87,120 square feet (2 acres) in area. The application only affects Parcel 5, the other parcel will remain unchanged. There will be no physical changes on the project site or to the buildings. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the City development standards and the requirements. B. Review Committees: Staff has determined that since no changes in grading, architecture, or other physical attributes of the project are proposed, review by the Grading, Design, and Technical Committees is not necessary. C. Environmental Assessment: This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (k) Existing Facilities because the proposal contemplates only the subdivision of interior space within a building located within an office/industrial complex that is under construction. • CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily a Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and the notices were mailed to all the property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18579 through adoption of the attached Resolution with the Conditions. Respectfully submmitted, /~ Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D - Parcel Map 7731 Exhibit E -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18579 Exhibit F - Building C Floor Plan Exhibit G - Building C Elevations Exhibit H -Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 12, 2000 (report only) • Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18579 B-2 r ~ p y~y M ` i 1 OOIEN/0. jAW~ ~i ~ ~ Rt ! fv;iro llefx oR6 _._.~.F. ~ t I.EXNmCN PL ! ~ 14 Q' ~ .~ i IAOtliA 0. ~ ~~~'~°`'~°'w.. (sue+.w....myR^. Tv LOx 1 = 4 R3NCETONR ~I U~~m~"P~i A uMIM GP y SOT ' ~ ` ROE8109m~ ~ O 8~ kj o ---t l> b j V t f N UNE RD 9698 < '~ {~ 3~~'°` ' so6~Pf p ~ wT t .._ _ F _ ._. ..~-.... ..» .. w ~ mwc` ~ ., _}.....,.a ~$ F. Ns i ,.. , ,e,~~,.,... ~V,P ... _,~a'Y~-p~«~ .« .~ g ~ i i i i gg~ 1~ igsloo~f ~reF.~en ~• _ _alvrs~ 9 IPEaren sT ~ •,,, F• ~~` ~ ~ li P i~ ~ ~ aaN+LOOo-~~ [sr--9 p ~ 4 ~C i ~ ~ povAL~ 1~. fr ~ li sT ~. wv.NUr cr ~ ~;naxa on td ' ~ anal cil ~ woxw~.4~ htew.cnaF` ~Ip- y{^~~ ¢ ~" ~ i Y OONA EL Fa oad sr ~. ~ i ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ i< c. ~n.¢c. + 4 R~~~ P$ i<' ~ m ~F ELEMENTARY ~~~ { 4 i ~ ~ & ~ ; i ;F e ~~ ux~aeT6x~ ~ E ~ ~ •gy ~~LdM g a' !m ~ 1E_ e~lT-~ POn AIeL,r..[ 1 INM i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f b ~; 7 4 {{ ~ w~ y ~ p S z yz F3 ~ y ' ~ ~ ~ ~ < ..._' j~ ~ 1 ., ..r .. ` ~wsE m ~V~g ~RSf~ < ~iRUNi ~ ~ ~ ~` s '~~~~ ~~+`9698 . ~ _.. ° BU9Pl ~ EBSLEMBI pA AIP WE~ m + ~ gALNA BT f ' CUCAMONGA !' ELEMENTARV MdU iy = 6 {s D w~ E ~aeRee~re -~. ~ F ~.~. r . , ! < ~ R 0 /} 1 ~ s ~ NOfAMCN fT ~ ~ f •. L ~{_ OANYDN A i~Cn~ twmvleMBY'a ~• -~..,...~..,..,.~..g ~ ~~1 ~ g,.,.°-7a~~x }}" L ~ ELEMEN7MY4 Martearom ~ oM ~F i ~~ EP,~.ex rr o ~ f k.._. ~° !q ~ti~4 I `•yM''Y. R 1EMOACREetm 1~~ I~r I r I` Oq~'~ 3 ( N f '6 a ~ ~ ~ r` ~~ maefr er ......r~59'ar ~ ~1 'Sa. 61c-+ ~u~ J 1 <~ HfAfFOR06T ~ ~ t ',~ tiy`w ~, 1' :...M1 ~~ cxY,.P..r'P`µ I Iif71RD B( ~ N i~.,~'..""""'~"~"f ' 1 1 ~ "..[,. i,~, ~ F ~l^ E ; F xAM xwe nT ~r1 ~ wiR¢^~ i ~eer~ '~~ 3 d 4r < ~ • hk V)~ ~ t~ ° WiF1(EA L Q ~ L~ •yy t i WA"' ~ ( r y 11 +~ k i SMURYm .r~1EiRfill...~~r ~"l 0.... ~,OOENfHt_.e OA ,.'© ® T[ °`~'~ ~ -f( ~ ? /~piIPARRAI W/ly`;1~ e.,...- ~ /""'''^''~ ~ W1rt~ ~ .t 4~Y'1 1 6iMYONtB DR ~^~T' "t'«I ~ • M;S k6R(III CR aA,Cc+:.~a. ~ [ ~. IA 2 VFSTFAN TRAk R. ! IiL "~ A ~ } ••'eyclr~ "a^TM! Y ~ + GREEN MEBACA ~ E $" I ~ ?~ °i°~ ,r a n~ea~rmNMnumePL r T~~• _ _ ~ aWC eex,e. os 1~~ k~ ~ 1 ~~t p ......., --i~ ,a.~,~.~. ~t,~ 10098 °°~:', "''°f• , e& 10498 - ~ ~~ ARROWRT ( 11. ,~~,.. L., ,...... ° ~ 6~NNf ~~... ~., a ..._. 4s ..... '' ~ ., ........._a a_,,...,» ...-.. P .R n....„, .....,~... 4~ __,.. .,,.~...._._.,~.. :... .............~..r.... FiLL M[ ,. ~ R II ~ s~fDBDIMDJ DR ~ ~ ~~ lTI~ y ~'A T1L~11 F 'a ~4 FVLL~NCf hfo v ~~ ~g e wA y ~+~ °"• y e.-- i< ~~ s~.R riARpsnm ucaMA On~~I~ M ~ ! 1 1 S pC 7~e ~w FORD ~y~S ;;~°t~`y ~gy(I'AORU20R ,+ r~..TON Of µ•.......~ I...~.e..ltoT {Y .m ~ yaLFltp~T•""' ,..~..+r~° Pr7v/~LnAA 5~ 7 y ~ j) i a 'fJ~~ ~` »rx fY ~ ~ 9~ ~~ E RAN~M~ 9`_."._~'" v i~ ~ ? a I` C ...~~, T ~ _~ ~ R_ ~. ...._.___..._.~....~.~_... 1~ - _~..-;.. ~~ _ ~......_..~ - r 3 ~ ~~ Nouum ~~~ ALatd"4?' f & r m ' ~ AcACIA sr 1~ .n v .[ ~~ A -... RNtA~LPNALT << 8 b I ~ t :_.®aW~~b, _ £_ __ _ -.-PROJECT SITE -, _s._._.__. `~ ~ { ~i E GAffRON Sf S t ___ .... ___ .-n `i pEERBR00R ~k ~ ~EREROCN Si iT ~ ._QiMON CR ;f Af t „wu~Anav 9r <mA. t i Ik ~ ` ~ »_ _~~_ 6TH 9TH ._ .v _ _ r} ~~ _«._~.~.. ». _ ~ _ ., r 4 ~! + r~ _ ~E # to 1 Do F ~ fi ; ELMW000OR t^~"""WV / kt1 ~ A ~~ (' t $MNTHatiNE__ c ~ 70 ~' ~ Ci ~cy'f F !n ~b 1 OtEBLENf LFNiER DR 1 I _ S1M 8f {p i F 4 _L 1 Y IA t dbt'fRFERN PL 1 ~ •~tl'~ ~~ ~~ f 1:~ t 1RACEMAPo(st ~ <' aRAC6MCw< ~~4 fi ~ u... 0 w.. PARMNAY NCRIII 9FNTyeY{i ,~' ~ nrsw.siaf~ i r 1 r. 4AA~YAl3{ .. - - E)CH I ~ IT ~ ~. ~~ .. __ ~ii.:~~ A~ _~. PDRMWAY60UiN~ P b ~ JERSEY BL t f~ reef ~ ~,_~~ cTiJ A~w ~~ 'F i f S" ; {f S~ L' ,w,,,,,,. _ _a[n si U ;'~~~.~ ~ , ~ ~ F ~ 4 ... .~,.~- .~_rN.iLatjv.~i .... Y ~~... ~M ~ ~ ~ ~: `,''. q ~ I ~x 5'~ ~~~ b -1.~l• .~~`~~~; f''1 '. .a ~~ jY. Y.' ~.._ • • J I I m5~g~~ ~R 0 ~8 ~~f`~mo w E s I ~» $mm „~ uvf Em ~ @a n V ®E a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~o?o E ~ t t ~ ~ p~Rg ~~°. c~ p p U<~~ to ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~~¢o a . > U ~ t~ 66q r ~~ ro ~ ~~ tl La 6 ~O (n ~ e R 3 e [i ~ 1 3M1 .LLtl3dOtld !Y 311E N M NpM Y M3N I ® n ~ ~ g '" 8 8 ®4 «~ I C ~ F ° ° ~ ~ € ~ i ~~ ~ I ~~ ~9~ ~~ m~ ~ G ~ C~ ' 'NM I G I I qi~ I I 2 ~ ~~ v. ~I~ U ~J I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ s " _ ~' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ A-~[ doOY Odlln F I ~ 1 I I ~ h t ~j ~ j I ~~ ~ ;~ ; ,~ WW 'll\ tl3lN'!k I Y ~ j ~~ ~ ~ f ~ I~ '~ I ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~6 ~ ~ ~_ ~g ~j I~~ m'I ° s ~$~a ~ i ~ O tl3ix'M ^ ~ ~ ~ „ „~ I `° N 4 j ^ a~ ~ yiif iii ~ m d i ~ l i r r ~ W ~ ~g ~ 4 ~ I i ,y ~ I I ` 6 ~ $ a v - >, ~ I ~ rt 3 ~ i n) Q Q ° v~°~ ~ 'I ~i ~~ Q .~ "" ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~~ >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ,~ k~ i ~ 7 8 .~l /I •~i j ~ ~ ~ 9 3dYasaNn j@ •L I\ ~3 s i §g, 'y ~ Na N. dou sna _ `~ ~ ~ E ---- --- i ? B s 9 -- ----------- }XISi-------~------- C 86~~ ~; ~~ .. ~ 8 --------------~----------------- I ~ e ~' ~ ° N ~~ ~ ~ B a ~6 z8 ~n ~~ z° ~ h ° ~ ~ ~ I I ~XH I B IT ~ B-5 6 PARCELS PARCEL --MAi? - N~ '~ -731 ° ~ ~ -- •= ~~ ~~ ~~~`~ ' - ~~"~~'~ 22662 ACRES ~ ~ _ . _ - '- " ~ i,,_ ' IN THE CITY DF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY DF ~ ' _ - = - ' - , _ _ I .,. . - SAN BERNARDINO, ST~ITE OF CALIFORNIA - ~ _ _ . , , ' _ ; > ' , . , BEING A PORTION OF LpT "D', NORTH GUCAMONGA TOW NSITE, AS PER PLAT RBC.ORDED _ -~ " ~ ' IN $ODK D OF MAP57 PAGE 15, REGORDJ OF SAID COUNTY. - _ _ ' - i' . _ ~ SEVENTH STREET - - > _ _ • - ~ ' - - - _ - BOYER ENGWEERING . , - ~ - ,:' ~ - - ~ I ` ' CO. INC. .• ~ ~~••/D >t20 DFFER Of DEDICATION 7D CITY Of RANCHO gJCAMOMSA ~ AUGUST '1983 R.C E 13542 __ . - •' _ - _ - _ - ' " , _ , ~ I FOR ORAINABE PNRPOJEB a ~j - , ' ' ° ' ~ - - '• - ' •- ` - -- NB9 32 32 W 36759 _ } ^_ _ p„ .. o - ~ ~I-- 6T0 42' - - ~ N B9'S ''32'W 737 13' - ' - - - M i . - i li7,l _ - ~ - _ - - _ - - - - _ -- _ ." l.OD' -fD/CA71L7N 70 THE CITY OP , ~ '' ~ ~ • ', ~tUCAMOw6A FOR STREET PURPOSES - ~ ~ ~ ~• ' __ ' 3 00'vac.lTloN Oe ~ L * 44.38 L . 45 09' - o DETAIL A fm 1-cP Gsar3 _ T!h sTRFEr srx /LSOGlrllON A/s 65 fM _ ;T " f4 96 T = 45,08' ,> PL9JH, PQ IA AA /Af2 PR4 = I'• 20' zr/.r:, • SPL/r cr ae TR~ui ~ SEVEPITH _ STREET _ ~ _ '~ 1 ~ ~ `r ,•S ~ - ~' ~ Y ar sr ar v rasa 8Ttt32s -25 ~ FD. P~f AYI L AO REf . _ sssrD P£I DEED 55760 ~ fi !~T Dr 1 a weI.3s'n'w so TSl' yi , , , °'D ¢ 70 12' 97 N -_ - II I'LI V SeL'1 TAG ~ NQe'SYJZ'4Y 594e' _ QJ DN FR GSfQ 1 92/13 ~ Nes• SZ' 32" W ~ T!7 / csa•zT LO• V •721L P£R PR _- 1 • A• Z\ Dd _ Aff GIM I/iD KffY 70 ~ SEE DETAIL A r 10 rZD'OFFFR OF DEDICATION i. iiii' JD JJ /e/ • _ - lW ( TD G?T OF RAN[ND CUfAMGKl7A - _ , FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSFS ~ J. _ ' ~ ~ "~ ~ ' ~' 7 1 ~ PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 ~ ~ ~ ' I }~ /1' 2013 ACRES ~~ BA515 OF BEARINGS ~ • 6.295 ACRES o w , a 1 ~ ~ h 8[ARiN65 SNOVN ON THIS MAP ARE ~ In 2 - BASED ON N 0' I6 00' W FOR TNF ~> tENTERLlNE OF [ENTER ST 1'•] O I PD RVH ]PA ( y RFE7 PER le i +y L 1 Iz1G v£A PRYD PM /8!2• PARCEL AAP BDOX zc/32 1 ~~ Y/M vne G~/GG-TD RFCL7RD5 OF SAN 6ERNARD/NO COUNTY I y Her 11 zD• y _ - - CALPORNIA ~ r/; ~' ~ 1LD7/~ lOD' DEDILA1Y1N 70 TN~ ~ ~ ~\' 'F ~, 1 /J ADVLAOAD EALE/LNT ~ CITY DF CVLA HDYGA FLE _ V °` '+ y x Fn P/M sPAL y LL fII7 IY L/LV I MONUMENT NOTES `' ~/•LA P£R PA wa IAf2 P/'IE4 7G/]i ', I _ I • INOI[ATES FOUND P10.YUffEN7 AS - - - 1 NOTED ,,,, I SET 2' ! P TAGGED 2CF /3592 AT Z "" J c ALL BOUNDARY AND PARCEL CORNERS ~ G ~'r~l•~..~. ti I CSFB COUNTY SURVEYORS F/E:D BOOK ~ ~ N er•t4'OO'E ~ SBCC SAU BfRNAROIND LOUNTT SURVE>/OR ~ /e ~ 7(S4' I , RLTO RANCHO CUCAMONGA T!E BOOK ~ [ ~ lND1CATES RECORD Q4 TA PER L __ j ` F\- . I :.f P R4~ ECT SITE ~ P M /29Z P M O 26/32 ~ t•A ~ l, ~ ~ ~ 1 ... ' 1 N ~ i ' PARCEL 1 I o j 8 060 ACRES ~, J ) PEA GIq/110 QR Z 7TRLET PVe POLES : _ °o 2 11.1 F' SCACE /'• !00' Z w U C~ ~' ~ ® 'ER DEED TAG 5,ff I i I 1 e 2 o PARCEL Q 2.000 ACRES h „ ~ rW ~u _ =a W 2G3 7/ r J ' W V ` / ~> O tit a rv rLP PARCEL 5 b o 2z d scuse. r+Ee -„e YS/ ^ 2000 ACRES `~ Z W • ~ w eY 11 zD• y Kl 71 _ ~.T ~ a P PARCEL fi c r 2 000 ACRES V ~ A. ev Jr Lr J NDD DEO/CA7f0Y T07~CIT1 Ot R•N00 CDCAnONGA F00 7TRFE1 PVRPDLEL L•77 f] 7• N I] N BV It 20• V 7/11f 1)~ 01 1 Z ^ ~ H f]' ~U 7] ~ 7Gf e/ ~ ( n _~ N 8!'4! 20•U l377G1' (532748'5 __ ~. SIXTH STREET RLE 15/70 PR YD 6517 w,r • r0/ 1 FD rLR VJ i8G7 TAG, FLUSY, PFR CSFB IOM /TIO { ACTA \.!C Y ~~~ ~ ~ a~~~ ~ ~~ a~ W ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~rr~ ~ ~a ~}$ a ~~ .. ` : ~r ~~ ~ ~1 r sY{ ~~ = L ~1 Q ~~ ~~4i ..1 at Til~$~~5 ~~~ ~~a ~'~~1f 0 a ~S~ ~~ . r~ ~ Z ~o~~~ N ~ W 'o~~~= ! Z ~ ~ ~ ~ OW6q~ . _ z a a~~; ~ N~N 1 Q a. ~ ~~~ H V ~6` i Q O ~ ~ W ~~ H ~` ~, J Q V C: ~ ~ ~~ ii ~ V Z (~-` N ~1 ~ r4 ~i ~ ~-' Y _I.r ~~, I~ ~I 7 ~- f iE ~ ~ I (~~__ ~ '~_ ____1 W ,~. iu~nw av mxa~wow wade spa. ` "~ k ,r "~ ~,' _~ 1 ~ ~-.~ a.1 ~+ ~~ ~-,.. ,till @I ~I ~I ~' ~~ ,~ anv vmin ` ~ ~ anaanv Nanvw ~ < o ` ° < i u ., ~ z on cu ~ `~ ° V ~o s ' """' F ~ " _ ~ ~ d ~,5 J ~ ` y0 ` 1 ~aazrNa ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ ~ .4'i1[ 11[.NiF ~h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 W z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z \ s ~ t ~ 4, } ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I I W I ' ~; j __~___ ----- I t - t ~. ~ ~ ( ~ I I I ~ ~U W O ' '~' ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ Y~ ~' 4~ S. r ~~"`~ 4 EXHIBIT E ' ~ I ~ Q ~ `\ II 133a1S H1X18 D 1 R A .~ R ; 0 I t~ a 4 l V ~+ ^ Yak i ~~~ ~~. ~~E Z ` ~ ~/ ~I !a ~i m • ~~««i' agagaapa ~RFpH ~=T4R~ • • EXHIBITF as C • • B-9 ~aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa z a J a 0 0 J O 2 O U W • ~~ l l aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa a~X%xxxl~ z a J a 0 0 J L_J • I ° '~~ ~86 ii •V~~ W Em d a i E e o~ di6~g ~ bV a~ a~«,~so ~ 0~6¢¢c ~ o. ~q ~~ d. c~i~~ f: }~ E ~''"~8¢oU c m ~~ ~~i ~~~ ~ 'w i ~ • ~ m a3 a Q 1 b ~q ; t h ~ C @ ~ ~ O : ~ I > ~ U ~~~ b c ~° ,..u mii • • - EXHIBIT G !p ¢ 1~tfi g '3 tR ®R }I~ I ~i I I I J ~ / I I ~ B•11 a T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SfiaffRe~7olt DATE: July 12, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-53 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a professional center consisting of a three-story, 32,000 square foot office building, a 4,450 square foot automotive fueling service and convenience center, and a 3,500 square foot restaurant, on 4 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located on the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 209-262-19 and 20. Related file: Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-05. Staff had prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Office -Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overtay District) South - Vacant land -Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) East - Office -Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) West - Industrial warehouse -General Industrial (Subarea 5) B. General Plan Desi4nations: Project Site -Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Generallndustrial C. Site Characteristics: The site contains two contiguous two-acre sized rectangular shaped vacant parcels that total 4 acres. There are no mature trees on the site nor is there other significant vegetation on the site. _The site is currently cultivated as a vineyard. The site slopes from north to south. • • EXHIBIT H B•12 Item B ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-53 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 12, 2000 Page 2 • D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required P%vided . Building A-1 3,250 1/250 13 13 Building A-2 1,200 1R5 16 16 (Fueling Service and convenience center Gasoline Canopy 3 3 Building B 3,500 1/100 35 35 (Restaurant) Building C 32,000 1/250 128 128 Office Center) Pre-Existing Condition 14 _14 TOTAL 209 211 • • Currently there are 14 parking spaces at the northwest comer of the property that were previously required for the office park to the north, Development Review 84-21 and Conditional Use Permit 85-27, as required by Resolution 85-171. The existing 14 parking spaces are being maintained and were not counted to satisfy parking for the proposed project. ANALYSIS: A. General: The three buildings are located along Haven Avenue and screen the parking spaces from public view. The automotive fueling service is oriented with the pump island behind the building to maximize screening from Haven Avenue consistent with Planning Commission policy. The restaurant building is directly north of the automotive fueling service convenience center. The three-story professional office building is north of a 36 foot-wide right-in and right-out textured access entryway off of Haven Avenue, that is also just northi of the restaurant building. The buildings are very well articulated with strong vertical and horizontal changes and recess to the building plane. These elements are consistent throughout the design. A green metal coping is used to create contrast and add a professional urban look to the building. Perforated metal fins, accent lighting, and spandrels glazing is all used to create a unique, quality look to the building. The three buildings incorporate three primary building materials, which are as follows: 1) Polished granite veneer, 2) Light colored brick which is used along the majority of the building facade, and 3) Sand blasted concrete, which is used at entry-ways and used as an accent. • _ .., .- B-13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-53 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 12, 2000 '~ Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design -Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) • reviewed the proposed project on June 6, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions, which have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Studywas completed bythe applicant and staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential short term impacts related to air quality due to construction activity, and hazardous materials due to automotive fueling services. Mitigation measures have been identified that would make the impacts less than significant ff the Planning commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet. Staff received a letter from the property owner to the north who objects to keeping the driveway access between the two projects (Exhibit "D"). Both projects are part of Parcel Map 7731, which granted the right of ingress and egress across all four parcels along Haven Avenue. The project applicant has access rights across both parcels to the north (the existing office complex). Further, redprocal access is consistent with the General Plan goal to reduce vehide trips along Haven Avenue. Staff also received letters from Rosalie and Nina Mandala and two letters from Athalon Properties objecting to the automotive fueling service use (Exhibits E and F). Staff received a letter from A. H. Reiter Development objecting to the service station and fast food use within the convenience store (Exhibit K). Additionally, staff has received a letter in support of the project from Rufus C. Barkley III of Cabot Industrial Trust (Exhibit G). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoJnmends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use • Permit 99-53 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitte B d Buller City Planner BB:DF:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Elevations Exhibit "D" -Letter from Dolphin Partners, Inc. dated May 25, 2000 Exhibit "E" -Letter from Rosalie Mandala and Nina Mandala dated May 23, 2000, and December 10,1999 - Exhibit "F" -Letters from Athalon Properties dated October 25,1999, and April 24, and May 24, 2000 Exhibit "G" -Letter from Rufus Barkley III, dated March 27, 2000 Exhibit "H" -Landscape and Grading Plans Exhibit "I" -Design Review Comments dated June 6, 2000 Exhibit "J" -Initial Study Parts I and II • Exhibit "K" -Letter from A.H. Reiter Development dated June 28, 2000 Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit 99-53 ~~ B-14 RESOLUTION NO 07-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18579, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE BUILDING C, ONE OF THE BUILDINGS OF ATHREE-BUILDING OFFICE/COMMERCIAL COMPLEX OF ABOUT 4 ACRES THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, INTO 19 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, OF THE HAVEN OVERLAY, LOCATED AT THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE ABOUT 330 FEET NORTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0209-262-19. A Recitals 1 Goodman and Associates, on behalf of Haven Pointe LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18579, as described m the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 8th day of August 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date • 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to Building C of an office/industrial complex consisting of three buildings in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 6, of the Haven Overlay, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street The subject building is about 330 feet north of 6th Street, and b The office/commercial complex (Related file• Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP99-53) was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 2000, and • c The application proposes the subdivision of Building C into 19 condominium units; and d No physical changes to the project site or the buildings are proposed, and B-15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-49 SUBTPM18579 -GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES August 8, 2007 Page 2 e. The overall project site is comprised of two parcels (part of Parcel Map 7731) with dimensions of about 661 feet (north-to-south) and about 264 feet (east-to-west). Building C is located on Parcel 5, which has overall dimensions of about 330 feet (north-to-south) and about 264 feet (east-to-west) Parcel 5 has a street frontage along Haven Avenue of about 330 feet, and f In relation to the office/industrial complex, the surrounding properties are fully improved with industrial and office development; and g. 1n relation to the office/industrial complex, all of the surrounding properties are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 6 With the exception of the properties to the west, all are also located within the Haven Overlay, and h The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and • b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the • General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(k) Existing Facilities because the proposal contemplates only the subdivision of interior space within a building that is under construction. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs m the staffs determination of exemption 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth • below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B -16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-49 SUBTPM18579 -GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES August 8, 2007 • Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of Building C on Parcel 5 of Parcel Map 7731 into 19 condominium units 2) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) 3) Prior to the modification of the boundaries of a unit on the condominium plan, the applicant shall submit the proposal to the City for review and approval prior to approval of any tenant improvements related to that modification. 4) Any increase in the number of condominium units shall require the submittal of a revised parcel map application for review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 5) The minimum floor area of each condominium unit shall be 250 square feet. 6) Each condominium unit shall have direct access to common areas and facilities such as lobbies, restrooms, elevators, and stairways • 7) Interior improvements including, but not limited to, construction or relocation of demising walls that separate condominium units, and the revisions to the location, size, or layout of common areas and the facilities such as lobbies, restrooms, elevators, stairways, etc. shall require review and approval by the City to ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable building and fire safety/prevention codes and regulations. Engineering Department 1) The final Parcel Map shall be processed for approval and shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. a) The final Parcel Map shall be prepared by survey and not record data only. b) Plancheck/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal. 2) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No 00-68 approving Conditional Permit Use 99-53 shall apply 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • B-17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-49 SUBTPM18579 -GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES August 8, 2007 Page 4 • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' ATTEST. Pam Stewart, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • B•18 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18579 SUBJECT: TENATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR 19 CONDOMINIUM UNITS APPLICANT: GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND 6TH STREET, PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7731 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1. The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-49, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the • date of the approval Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18579StdCond 8-8 doc B-19 Protect No SUBTPM18579 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/_• site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been compiled with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/ /_ other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper Illumination 6. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ' _/_/_ owner, homeowners association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape . maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18579StdCond 8-8 doc B •20 yOMO~ ~ u Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de- sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. • 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project must be maintained m accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems B -21 Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings. • 3. "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 4. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5. When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2. Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. 3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures ls` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. • 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4 Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. CommerciaVIndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in • accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. B -22 2 b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. • e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction • features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. , d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems B-23 3 • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leasedproperty which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services • Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment • designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. • Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems B -24 4 facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. ~CS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District 85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence • of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code B-25 5 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler • monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7 Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 10. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate • (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 `/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • B-266 .-~--~- _,~ ./l ~~ j~ ~ ~ ~k1- T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: August 8, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Pei-Ming Chou, Associate Planner SUBJECT: THIRD TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92.78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction. The tract is part of a larger protect which includes a request for a parcel map and two tentative tract maps to subdivide 248 63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose ofsingle-family home construction in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located north of W ilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west • of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0225-071-37, 48, and 50 and 0225-081-08, and 11. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227. Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in July 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. BACKGROUND: A. The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15699, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 on July 24, 2002, fora 3-year period. On July 13, 2005, the applicant applied for and received a 1-year time extension from the Planning Commission for SUBTT16226. The applicant applied for and received a second 1-year time extension on August 23, 2006. The applicant is requesting a third request fora 1-year time extension for SUBTT16226. There have been no changes to the City's development standards since these maps were approved. ANALYSIS' A. Subdivision Map: On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously). The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452 69(e). The maximum life of this protect would be • up to 8 years from the date of approval (final expiration on July 24, 2010). ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT August 8, 2007 Page 2 • B. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master EIR for the University/Crest Planned Development in June 1991, and in October 1999. The County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development. In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement. The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the project that would require a mayor revision to the previous EIR in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless• (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts Staff has evaluated the time extension request and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The site has been graded and portions of the site are under construction consistent with the previously approved applications. The time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that • Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental EIR since the tentative parcel map and tentative tract maps were originally approved on July 24, 2002. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, and do not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. No changes have been made to the project and there have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require mayor revisions to the previous EIR. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional enviranmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the time extension request. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Res ectfully submitted ~- Jam s R. Troyer, AICP Pla ing Director JRT:PC/rlc - • Attachments• Exhibit A Letter from Applicant dated June 4, 2007 Exhibit B -Location Map Exhibit C -Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 Exhibit D -Initial Study Part I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for -G~2~ Extension for SUBTT6226 7w~h, r{~ f f~~~ crr! ~;~r~„ ' DCVCLOPM ENT 1 NC. June 4, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Candice Burnett -Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAIVpNGA ~~I~ ~ .~ ~ao~ RE: Tentative Tract No. 16226-2 Rancho Etiwanda Estates • RECElVEd - PLANNlNC Dear Ms. Burnett: By way of this letter, we are hereby requesting a Map Time Extension on Tentative Tract No. 16226-2 due to timing of permits and construction. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact myself or Kimberly Vander Riet. Sincerely, BCA Developmer~lt, Lzc. Ben ~. Anderson President BCA:kv Enclosures • EXHIBIT A 3194-C1 Airport Loop Ur~ve, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone (714) 966-1544 -Fax (714) 966-I 540 C-3 L4CATICN I~lAP F~ANCH4 ETI ~ TE ~~ ------- t~ow~- '~ M~~~wk'I ~ ~~ `<<'~~~ I i..-i~~t~ '~r'4~~r ~ _ I ' w ~1~` _ ~ Ir / ' / I I / ', II o ~; ~ { ¢ ( ~ ~{ I = { W {I o i Q 1 m II { WAN DA ESTATES • i EXHIBIT B C-4 . ~ 9SE91 ,L7V1I1 3ALLV1N71 • ^ ' ~~ ~ G. p ~t ~1 BBI ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , i' ''~~ 1 ~~ ~~_ ~ 9 1 4 6 11E e0l 11 6l ~ gi~°~° ~ ~ ~~~~ ~6~~ ~° ~° l ~~~ ~ ll' ~ '~ ~ E ~,i ~ ~ ~ a[i ti 1~t 5 ~i ~~e p ~ ° ~ ~IE i61 IE l~itl ~ 1 C 3 ~ .1 ` z• '-~ a ~Q v~ z o ~ ~Iz ~ `¢ ~O ~'~ N~ o E.. ~O `~ ~gQa~ o '0 y ~~z ~d ~° l of v ~ o ~~ EXHIBIT C ' i ~ i ~ lF~el'~Y~ ~ ®®~ .~,~al I 1 ~ r rr I~g ~~ ~' ttt ~~5t~~~e ae YES ~,1 ~'I~~le O~i ~Ybd t~119{11 ~ !:~ ..,... ~ )i rat i l 9ZZ9i • ,1.~V1l1 3AI1V1H31 .-o- E ^ i~~ y k .r•` - ~~1 . !Q t 1^es ~ -- -'~~i ~~~ ~~ ^~ , , p ,, ~1 M Q ~'~~-~. ~~ .r ~~ :~ ~~ ~ y'a~ ~t'1 A r ~ ~ li ~~ B ~ , ~~ E ~y _~~ ~ ~ _._ j , It , 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ .a ~ e, ; i EI B ~, A..o ~ I ~ ~~ i i tw~ i Fe' ,' C-6 ~' ~~ , ~ ~ t' ~ a ~ ~~ ., >o • <z ~ ` ° ~ ~ !5 F i t ~~ ~ 6 , i I ~ ,~ } ~. 1, ~~ ° ~IIE` ~~ l ._ r i 1 ~ '~~ - 9I1 1 I~ y 1 "e rl 1! ' ~ e ' i J, Q ~ e -^ !! 6 , ~t ~ ~~ E~ ~. ~ , .~ ~ ~, ~ i r' .44, i ~ J1~ ~ r r~ ,~ I s ~ ~ '" i j Cl_~ i• ~'~ ' ENVIRONMENTAL ~~ INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ary of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly us-ng -nk Use the tab key to move from one 1-ne fo the next 1-ne.) Planning Department (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. • Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will ,not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will ~be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information Application Number for the project to which this form pertains Tentative Tract Map 16226-2 Project Tale Rancho Etiwanda Estates Name & Address of project owner(s) Chin Yun Yeh Chuang, 1 100 Avondale Road San Marino, CA 91108 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor BCA Development, Inc , 3194-C 1 Airport Loop Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 • EX H I B IT D STATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 1 of 10 Rev C-7 Contact Person & Address Ben C Anderson, BCA Development Inc 3194-C1 Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above) Same as Above Telephone Number (714) 966-1544 • *1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, yews into and from the site from the primary access points That serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Project Location (describe) Day Creek Boulevard -North of Wilson Avenue • 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet rf necessary) See Attached *5) Gross Srte Area (ac/sq ft) 37 437 ac *6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) Same 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the project site (attach addrt~onal sheet rf necessary) Project Approvals Include, Tentative Map Parcel Map EIR, EIR Addendum, Final Supplemental EIR, General Plan Amendment, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment and Development Agreement No 01-01 dated August 1 2001 Parcel Map No 15699 and Tentative Tract Maps 16226 and 16227 Extensions Approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga on Au ust 23 2006 Final Tract Maps Nos 16226-1 and 16226 approved and N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Irntial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 2 of 10 Rev C-8 information indicated by an asterisk (*) rs not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff recoraea 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permits which wtll be necessary from the City ofRancho Cucamonga and othergovemmenta! agencies rn order to fully implement the project • Exlsting permits Include U S Flsh and Wildlife Blolo ical Opinion, Callfornla Dept of Fish and Game 1603 Permit U S Army Corp of Engineers Nationwide 404 Permlt Callfornla Regional Water Quality Control Board 401 Permlt Gradln Permits Other 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any exrsfrng structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In add~6on, cite all sources ofrnformation (~ a ,geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) See Final Supplemental EIR dated June 7, 2001 • 70) Describe the known cultural and/orhrstoncal aspects of fhe site Crte all sources ofinformation (books, published reports and oral history) • N 1K~m's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 3 of 10 Rev C-9 None PRIMP Report prepared by McKenna, et al dated September 29 2004 • 7 7) Describe any Horse sources and therrlevels that now affect the site (arroraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses None 72) Describe the proposed project rn detail. This should provide an adequate descnpt~on of the srfe rn terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach addrtiona/ sheet(s) if necessary See Development Agreement, 01-01 dated Au ust 1 2001 • 73) Describe the surrounding properties, including rnforrriat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, orscenic aspecfs Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc), intensity of/and use (one-family, apartmenthouses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) See Flnal Supplemental EIR dated June 7, 2001 74) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ • N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 4 of 10 Rev C•10 No 15) Indreate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, rncludrng source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed See Final Supplemental EIR dated June 7, 2001 *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees None 17) Indreate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains See Final Supplemental EIR dated June 7, 2001 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 See Supplemental EIR dated 6/7/01 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaf/Day) b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected darlysewage generation (See AttachmentA forusage estimates) Forfurtherclanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenbal (gal/day) See Supplemental EIR dated 61701 b Commercial/Industnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units 262 Detached (Indreate range of parcel sizes, minimum !ot srze and maximum !ot srze Minimum lot size 7,200 sf Maximum 14,000 sf + N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 5 of 10 Rev C•11 Attached (~nd~cate whetherun~ts are rental orforsale units) For Sale • 21) Ant~c~pated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ 700,000 to $1,000,000 Rent (per month) $ fo $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 3-5 23) Indicate anticipated household size by urnt type 2,900 sf to 4,000 sf 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the project Contact the appropnate Schoo! D~stncts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary See Flnal Supplemental EIR b JuniorH~gh dated June 7, 2001 c Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or institutional uses None 26) Tota! floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or msfitutional uses by type None 27) Indicate hours of operation None • N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS1lnitial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 6 of 10 Rev C -12 28) Number of employees Total None • Maxrmum Shrft Trme of Maxrmum Shrft 29) Provide breakdown of antrcipated~ob classifications, rncludrng wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndreat~on of the rate o1 hire for each classrficafron (atfach additional sheet rf necessary) None 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn the Crty Unknown '31) For commercial and industna/ uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of airpollut~on emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283) None • ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine them abrlify to provide adequate service to the proposed pro~ect~ If so, please rnd~cate them response Yes All approvals In place 33) In the known history of fhis property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/ortoxrc matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesfrcrdes and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage ofany of the above Please Irst the matenals and descnbe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rf known None Phase One Environmental Slte Assessment Complete • N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS1lnitial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 7 of 10 Rev C-13 34) Will the proposed pro/ectrnvolve fhe temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/ortoxrc materials, rncludmg but not l~mrted to those examples listed above If yes, prowde an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and • Labeled on the application plans No I hereby certify that fhe statements fumrshed above and rn the attached adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my ability, that the facts, sty tot he best of my knowledge and belief /further understand that additional adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date June , 2007 Signature data and rnformat~on required for ibon presented are true and correct equrred to be submitted before an Tale President • • N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 8 of 10 Rev C•14 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family • Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source. Cucamonga Valley Water D~stnct Eng~neenng & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • N \K~m's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 9 of 10 Rev C-15 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sulte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 N \Kim's Documents\RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES\CITY DOCUMENTS\Initial Study Part1 16226 doc Page 10 of 10 Rev C-16 U BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project Files: SUBTT16226 2. Related Files: SUBTPM15699, SUBTT16227, DRCDA01-01, DRCGPA01-01 D, and DRCENSPA01-02 3. Description of Project: THIRD TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 -BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92.78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction. The tract is part of a larger project which includes a request for a ' parcel map and two tentative tract maps to subdivide 248.63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0225-071-37, 48, and 50 and 0225-081-08, and 11. Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the • project to be within the scope of the project covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in July 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: BCA Development, Inc Ben Anderson 3194-C1 Airport Loop Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 6. Zoning: Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Utility Comdor 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at Day Creek Boulevard, north of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue The site is bordered by a Southern California Edison Corridor designated Utility Corridor, Flood Control to the west, North Etiwanda Preserve (vacant) designated • Hillside Residential to the north, Etiwanda Creek/vacant land designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the east, and recently-constructed C-17 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16226 Page 2 single-family homes designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the • south (University Planned Development) The onginal site sloped to the south and is part of a broad alluvial fan located at the based of the San Gabnel Mountains. The site burned dunng the 2003 Grand Pnx Fire. There are currently two housing developments under constnaction on Tract 16227 and two more projects are pending design review and permits for the site. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None ANALYSIS: The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates area provides for a 632 lot single-family subdivision on 248 63 acres located west of Etiwanda Avenue north of Wilson Avenue. The Site Plan and building elevations for the proposed development • are established by the Development Agreement and are intended to be generally consistent with development standards in the Development Code and Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The impacts of the project were evaluated as part of the EIR and no change is proposed. The project will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (1991), as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (2001), as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. • C-18 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16226 Page 3 Signed: _ _ _ i-Ming Chou Associate Planner July 11, 2007 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) • (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised Urnversity project (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Project (Certified August 1, 2001) • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. ~ ,., , Signature: Print Name Title. 'J~ ~~ G~~2~S ~ Z~ C-19 RESOLUTION NO 07-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A THIRD ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 265 LOTS ON 92.78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 UNITS DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE NORTH ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-071-37, 48 AND 50 AND 0225-081-08 AND 11. A. Recitals. 1. BCA Development filed an application for a third time extension of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 24, 2002, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 02-77, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On July 13, 2005, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 05-55, thereby approving the application for aone-year time extension subject to specific conditions and time limits. • 4. On August 23, 2006, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 06-81, thereby approving the application for a second one-year time extension subject to specific conditions and time limits. 5. On August 8, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application for a third one-year time extension and concluded said hearing on that date. 6 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 8, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and b Approval of the time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and C •20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-50 SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT August 8, 2007 Page 2 c. Approval of time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master EIR for the University/Crest Planned Development in June 1991, and in October 1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development. In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement. The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the project that would require a mayor revision to the previous EIR Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (n) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the prolect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts; and b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the third time extension request, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The site has been graded and portions of the site are under construction consistent with the previously approved plans. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-significant. No changes have been made to the project and there have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR; and c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the third time extension request for SUBTT16226, and d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the EIR, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before • the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect asset forth in C -21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-50 SUBTT16226 -BCA DEVELOPMENT August 8, 2007 • Page 3 California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5 ) 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTT16226 BCA Development July 24, 2008 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No 02-77 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows. Plannina Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate, at • its own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2007, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. C •22 -~ . ut ~'Sr"t. ~'~, • q _ l- T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Stiff Report DATE: August 8, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 1 1, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree • Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Community Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District Subarea 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. APN:1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. These items were continued from the July 25, 2007, Planning Commission meeting; the previous staff report is attached for your reference. Respectfully submitted, ~' Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director Attachment: Exhibit A -July 25, 2007, Planning Commission Staff Report • ITEM D & E Siff Report DATE: July 25, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. • CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 - RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING - A request to amend the Development District from Commurnty Commercial (CC), Foothill Boulevard District Subarea 3, to Mixed Use (MU) for approximately 17 acres of land, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. APN: 1077-601-02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Review DRC2006-00633, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636. BACKGROUND: The project area encompasses the property fronting the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue, directly south of and adjacent to the existing single-family residences to the north (Exhibit A). There are 11 lots within the project area that contain approximately 17 acres. The existing land uses include both commercial (Shop & Go, Twins Club, Route 66 Memories, and Bill Espinoza's Tire Service, and The Whole Enchilada) and residential (legal non-conforming apartments behind Shop & Go and two legal non-conforming single-family residences behind Espinoza Tire). In July 2006, the National Community Renaissance and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency submitted a request to develop a 166-unit affordable housing apartment complex on the easterly 10.5 acres of the project site. The General Plan and Development District Amendment applications were submitted to change the underlying land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). This land use change would allow for the development of the apartment complex and take into consideration land use compatibility with the existing and proposed • land uses within the project area by master planning the entire block. Under the existing zoning, only commercial land uses could be developed in the CC zone, while under the proposed MU zone, EXHIBIT A D & E- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00635 AND DEVELOPMENT . DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00634 July 25, 2007 Page 2 development could include either commercial or residential land uses that would be compatible to land uses within and adjacent to the project area. The majority of the existing land uses within the project boundary will remain; Espinoza Tire and the adjacent non-conforming single-family residences will be removed to allow for the development of the apartment complex. ANALYSIS: Amending the General Plan land use designation and the Development District Map from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) would allow for the development of the project area m a manner that promotes land use compatibility with the existing residential uses to the north of the project area and with the existing, and future, commercial uses to the east and west of the project area, thereby promoting future development consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends further study of the issue and the initiation of a General Plan Amendment and a Development District Amendment. Respectfully submitted, ~~R • James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TG/ge Attachment: Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial • D& E-3 ^ ' ~ l~ 1~~i ~ ~ .,4 1 ~ l~'1 1 , - Vi1 f 1 ~~ '% ^ ,l I y`I~~ ~i' ' ; , ~ ~, r~ girl A''I 1~' I{ ~ I~ i~ YY `~ ~ ~ ' i /JIB 1 ~ ~- 4i 4~1 ~ Ii try '' I ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 1~~)~ ~ ' ~ ~ el 1 rl 1. ~~ I ~~ EXHIBIT A ~4i rr Jp~ (T~F~y~~ti 4 _ . Syr! ^t~ry It` ~'r~a ~ ry '~' IF-S ~ ~;,krP;~,y~,~j,~~ll~~', Ih~~ u ~',2n;k,•,,+;t,E '~ t~~k'~~.~"ati'('l~r+~fx ~l~i~r."4y~~4~las~,~r 1~ , tii ,, 7 a ^ ~ ~i~~ .~nr , „ a° I !-*`~ t~'~~t ~l fT~„N a,~_ tin ~_ D& E-4 ° t~ ie ~~I. Y :!f ~y~~, '9jfi li I'1nJ~ ~ ,V~f,M~nL ~+yAxe lY t~ ~~t ~f ~ ~r h~ ~,.~ q` `tag 'k. rya r; ',`• }.;%`.y~'~?±I ;ilt ~l 1, 1Y164;,r {,y ~~tb 1 ~'~+~~ ~ ~ K~~l~ N,4'F~fl~'~~3F Al e t~`~f5'~,[T tllll t h^1t ~1~~"ry yrt ~4'„Fq'W~ti+!'j4a +.' 1 V;~u~f~y s IJ-~14f7M ~x~ ~7 il;f~4~c~'~iN~~',. •seP~ 1p ~ AH 1 ~r ~,' ~, e 51~9,1ty y,,,, e'~; .Y ~a~F aiaN~~r . F ~F.ry.tiiSf i7=A.Y' yhr•'~ ~ ,.fl~~~~~~ ~ . 4 `FJill~{~$C1/E~~~~~ S ~,,yy f~~yjfC' 7~ ~ry~11''r ~i 1(~Ij Y ~( rs'~' 3L,yr kYr~C I ~~ r {'N ~~3~~ rY ~ A~~ n~ ~i- F ~ i~ 4' `V ~`~4~,-.,rNr ,1 ..C~JIr`~FS.,~,A;„;L~,~I '~,s~ % ~'e.niFlE~{,lr, >,~~'~rc, Jl~ 'Ill,yl~, _ '~1_ +a k- r~,~a ~' fx .~~'h oe c 21' ~!.2t t- Stiff Report DATE August 8, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND The Planning Commission Administrative Regulations provide for election of Chairman and Vice Chairman in July of each year • RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman to serve for one-year terms Respectfully submitted, ,~ ~ • ~ ~~~ Ja es R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT LS/is ITEM F Staff Report DATE August 8, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND The Commission normally reviews Design Review Committee membership at least once a year It is now time to review the Committee membership • Commissioner McPhail retired m March of this year Commissioner Munoz, having served as an alternate, now serves on the committee m the position vacated by Commissioner McPhail Chairman Stewart also serves on the Committee RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership for the Design Review Committee Respectfully submitted, Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT LS Is Attachments Design Review Committee Membership 1994 to Present Staff Membership of the DRC • ITEM G DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP March 2007 to present July 2003 to March 2007 April 2003 to July 2003 January 1999 to present January 1994 to Present COMMITTEE Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Cnstme McPhail Pam Stewart Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Larry McNiel Pam Stewart September 1998 to January 1999 Rich Macias Larry McNiei January 1997 to September 1998 Bill Bethel Rich Macias August 1996 to January 1997 Rich Macias Larry McNiel January 1996 to August 1996 Heinz Lumpp Larry McNiel August 1995 to January 1996 Heinz Lumpp John Melcher December 1994 -August 1995 Heinz Lumpp Larry McNiel June 1994 -December 1994 Heinz Lumpp John Melcher December 1993 -June 1994 Larry McNiel John Melcher ALTERNATES in order Rich Fletcher Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher John Mannermo Rich Macias Peter Tolstoy Peter Tolstoy' Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Larry McNiel Bill Bethel Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker John Melcher Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker John Melcher Peter Tolstoy Larry McNiel Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Heinz Lumpp • • G-2 STAFF MEMBERSHIP OF DRC • Nov 2006 Mike Diaz Nov 2004 Dan Coleman July 2004 Nancy Fong July 2003 Nancy Fong July 2002 Dan Coleman July 2001 Nancy Fong Jan 2001 Larry Henderson Dec 1999 Dan Coleman July 1999 Nancy Fong Jan 1999 Larry Henderson Jan 1998 Nancy Fong July 1997 Dan Coleman Jan 1997 Dan Coleman July 1996 Nancy Fong Jan 1996 Larry Henderson July 1995 Nancy Fong Jan 1994 Dan Coleman • G-3