The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995/05/17 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. May 17, 1995 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex Cmtierrez, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. Ao CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo , Gutierrez , and Williams __ B. ANNOUNCEMENTSIPRFSENTATION$ Presentation of Proclamation declaring May as Older Americans Month. Presentation of Proclamation designating May 22 as Math Day in Rancho Cucamonga. Presentation of Proclamation to Alberta Wormdahl recognizing her for her Dedication in Promoting Disaster Preparedness. Presentation of Proclamation to Chaffey Joint Union High School Distdct for their Participation in Promoting Disaster Preparedness in the City. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the week of May 21 - 27, 1995 as National Public Works Week. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CALFNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: March 15, 1995 March 22, 1995 April 5, 1995 (Special Meeting) April 19, 1995 May 3, 1995 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE 2 , , Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/3/95 for the total amount of $1,070,051.86. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 1995. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General, Holiday Wine & Spidt Company, Tara and Tarshinder Dhillon, 10451 Lemon Avenue Suite A. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Establishment, No name given for business, Jaruwan Chuwatthanakul and Nives Kamnuanmasok, 8038 Haven Avenue #A. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of a bus bay on the north side of Arrow Route, just west of Haven Avenue, to be funded from Fund 14 Air Quality Improvement Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044. RESOLUTION NO. 95-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, JUST WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to reject all bids for the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Rehabilitation as non-responsive to the needs of the City and authorize staff to immediately re-bid the project. Approval to appropriate $20,000.00 from Fund 14, Air Quality Improvement Grant for construction of a bus bay on the north side of Arrow Route just west of Haven Avenue. Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1994~95 Appropriations. Approval of Resolutions of Inducement for various housing projects. (Continued from May 3, 1995) 6 12 15 17 22 25 27 87 City Council Agenda May t7, 1995 PAGE 11. 12. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 95-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MOUNTAINSIDE APARTMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 95-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE SYCAMORE SPRINGS APARTMENTS RESOLUTION NO, 95-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MONTEREY VILLAGE APARTMENTS Approval of co-sponsoring High School All-Star game with Quakes and Daily Bulletin to benefit the "Send an Underprivileged Kid to Camp" program. Approval to authorize the Engineering Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to submit to SAN BAG projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1996/2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the Roadway Widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 95-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROADWAY WiDENING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE-FOURTH STREET INTERSECTION 89 91 93 95 99 103 104 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE 4 14. 15. 16. Approval to purchase one (1) Conventional Truck Cab-Chassis Schwarze Model 7,000 Air Street Sweeper from Road Machinery Incorporated of Chino, California, in the amount of $119,944.39 to be funded from General Fund Account No. 01-4645-7045. Approval of the installation of two baseball scoreboards at Heritage Community Park, requested and funded by the Alta Loma Little League. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Disposition of City owned property adjacent to Santa Clara Court and ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 14116, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Sheffield-Alta Loma 55, Ltd. RESOLUTION NO. 95-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 14116, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 95-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14116 RESOLUTION NO. 95-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATI'ACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN 117 119 122 124 125 128 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE 5 17. 18. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 95-015) for Bike Lockers and Racks at Civic Center, City Yard and Metrolink Station for the amount of $17,462.50 ($15,875.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Air Quality Management Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044 to Trautwein Construction. Approval to set a Public Hearing for June 21, 1995, to consider establishment of an Underground Utility District along Archibald Avenue and along Fourth Street, 1,600 feet north and south of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street, using Rule 20A Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 95-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG FOURTH STREET; 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET: USING RULE 20A FUNDS 133 135 137 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the Ume of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISFD PUBLIC HFARINGS The following item have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDFRATION OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATF pI AN. THF ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVFLOPMFNT BLOCK GRANT PROJFCT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1995/96 AND AMFNDMFNTS TO THF CITiTFNS' PARTICIPATION P~ AN -The review and adoption of the Federally required Consolidated Plan which covers the five-year pedod for FY 1995-1999, the Annual Action Plan for FY 1995/96, including the final selection of projects 140 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE o for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a grant of $1,024,000 and $37,644 in Program Income, and review of required amendments to the City's Federal Citizens' Participation Plan. (Continued from May 3, 1995) RESOLUTION NO. 95-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN INCLUDING THE FINAL SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN CONSIDFRATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GFNFRAL PLAN AMFNDMENT 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING ELEMI=NT UPDATF - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Government Code, a revision and update of the city's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units, at risk of conversion to market rate, through June 30, 2004. RESOLUTION NO. 95-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02A, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 177 180 211 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeUng to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPFFD LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON CHURCH STRFFT FROM PEPPER STRFFT TO ARCHIBALD AVFNUE: AND A SPFFD LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON MORNING PI ACF AND VINTAGF DRIVE FROM BANYAN STRFFT TO MILLIKFN AVENUF 213 City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE ORDINANCE NO. 540 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS 223 H, CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDFRATION OF REGUI ATIONS AND GUIDFLINFS TO HFLP PRFVFNT CONVENIFNCE STORF ROBBFRIFS 227 I. COUNCIL BUSINFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCF 231 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MFFTING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda May 17, 1995 PAGE L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO RECESS TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.8, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE; VALLEY BASEBALL AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. EXECUTNE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO A BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 18, 995 IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM AT 4:00 P.M. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 11, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 15, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDFR A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 15, 1995, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; William P. Cudey, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager;, Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O°Neil, City Engineer; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTSIPRFSENTATIONS B 1. Presentation of Proclamation to the Rancho Cucarnonga Police Department recognizing them for their continued outstanding service to the community. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Ron Bieberdorf and'staff from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Councilmember Gutierrez also commended the Police Department for their service to the City. B2. Presentation of Proclamation Designating March as Red Cross Month. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Jim Lawry and Bea Watson. Bea Watson commended the Inland Valley Chapter and talked about the telethon to be held on March 26 at the Comcast Station. B3. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the week of March 12-18, 1995 as Gid Scout Week. No one was present to receive the proclamation. City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 2 B4. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the week of March 26-Apdl 1, 1995 as Architecture Week. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to John Melcher. B5. Presentation of the Special Award of Excellence for the Adult Sports Complex from the California Park & Recreation Society. Mark Whitehead of the Park and Recreation Commission presented the award to the City Council. Bob Meuting and Dan Guerra who were involved with the project were also present. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PURl IC C1. Mayor Alexander stated there is a report on Routs 30 tonight if anyone would like a copy of it. D, CONSFNTCALFNDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: December 21, 1994 (Special Meeting) December 21, 1994 January 17, 1995 February 1, 1995 (Gutierrez absent) D2. Approval ofWarTants, Registsr Nos. 2/22/95, 311/95 and 3/8195; and Payroll ending 2/9/95, 2/23/95 and 319/95 for the totsl amount of $3,661,055.16. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 28, 1995. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Haven Wine & Liquor, Flash Holdings Incorporated, 8401 Haven Avenue. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Numero Uno Pizza 37, Raymond P. and Jeffrey M. Barkes, 8998 Foothill Blvd #102. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Howell's Farm House Cafe, Richard A. Howell, 8733 Etiwanda Avenue. D7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Baskets Galore, Alexander L. and Darcy L. Frazin, 10970 Arrow Routs fr207. D8. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Spires Restaurant, David and Lynn Ferreire, and Joseph and M. Juraci Garcia, 10380 Foothill Boulevard. D9. Approval of expenditure from Asset Seizure Fund for vadous equipment for the Police Department, in an amount not to exceed $97,000.00. D10. Approval of a request by the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to waive City fees in conjunction with the annual Business and Community Expo. City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 3 Dll. Approval to co-sponsor the D.A.R.E. Baseball Clinic at the Epicenter between the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes, Rotary International, The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. D12. Approval to authorize the Engineering Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to file a claim for reimbursement by SANBAG of funds expended for curb cuts for the disabled on Camelian Street from Base Line Road to 19th Street in the amount of $11,837.75. D 13. Approval of Resolution upholding the applicant's appeal of a condition of approval for Conditional Use Permit 93-49. RESOLUTION NO. 95-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL AND APPROVING A WALL SIGN AT THE WEST ELEVATION, FOR HOME EXPRESS, A TENANT WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER SQUARE COMMERCIAL CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421- 58 AND 63 D14. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Agreement for Encroachment in City Easement or Right-of-Way and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map No. 14647, bounded on the south by Fourth Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, an on the west by Cleveland Avenue, submitted by Environmental Golf, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 95-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 14647, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND AGREEMENT FOR ENCROACHMENT INTO CITY EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY RESOLUTION NO. 95-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 14647 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Gutierrez, who abstained on voting on the February 1, 1995 minutes and Item D3. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 4 No items were submitted. No items were submitted. No items were submitted. F. ADVFRTISFD PUB! IC HF&RINGS G. PUBLIC HFARINGS H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTS H1. RFVII=W OF CURRFNT TAXI CAB ORDINANCF Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Bdan Hunt, President, Yellow Cab, commented on the ordinance as was outlined in the staff report. Councilmember Curatalo asked if the City has experienced any problems with the Ordinance as it stands today. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated no. Councilmember Curatalo asked if the residents are being charged through taxi cabs as it now stands. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manger, stated yes. Robert Brady, former owner of Classic Cab, stated his issue is monopoly and stated that some residents do not want to dde Yellow Cab. He talked about complaints that are against Yellow Cab and that the City staff is not doing anything about them. He did not feel Yellow Cab should be a monopoly in the City. Councilmember Gutierrez asked him about limousine service. Mr. Brady explained how his limo service worked. Councilmember Williams asked Captain Bieberdorf what his thoughts were on this issue. Captain Bieberdorf, Police Department, stated he felt Rancho Cucamonga should conduct its own background checks and leave the Ordinance like it is now. Mayor Alexander asked Mr. Hunt if they do drug screening. City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 5 Brian Hunt, Yellow Cab, stated yes. Councilmember Gutierrez felt them needed to be a committee to work with Captain Bieberdorf to see if any of the recommendations are valid. Councilmember Curatalo stated he sees no reason to change the Ordinance. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to see why everyone else believes in the proposed system. He stated he would be willing to work with someone else on this issue. Councilmember Biane felt it was a good idea to check out the company coming in. Councilmember Willjams stated she agreed with what Councilmember Gutierrez was saying, but agreed with Councilmember Curatalo that she did not see anything that needed fixing. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander for Gutierrez and Curatalo to further study the matter and bring back recommendations to the entire Council. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated he would get any information from other cities as to how they handle this matter. I. COUNCIl BUSINFSS I1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSFD ORDINANCE TO PREVFNT CONVFNIFNCF STORF ROBBFRIFS AND OTHFR ALTFRNATIVFS (Continued from February 15, t995) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Don Kurth, of the Chamber of Commerce, stated they am in support of the recommendaljon, but that it not be implemented as a mendate. They would like to work with the City on this. Councilmember Williams stated she thought it was a good idea for the City to work with the landlord of the convenience store. She stated she felt the convenience store owners do want to meet the City requirements, but did not feel they should be mandated to do so. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would not be in favor of a mendate unless the City helps to pay for them. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with items 1, 2, 3, 4, but felt items 5, 6, 7 were the greatest cost impact, even though they were good suggestions. He stated he did want to listen to the business community and felt the safety for the residents was important also. Councilmember Williams asked if some of these suggestions could be included in the item she had previously requested to discuss on temporary signs. City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 6 Councilmember Curatalo stated visibility is important to the police as well as the perpetrator. Councilmember Gutierrez felt items I and 4 could be worked out and not be too costly. He felt the rest were good recommendations but did not think they should be mandated. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Alexander for Biane and Alexander to study the matter further and bdng back recommendations to the Council. Motion carded unanimously, 50. 12. DISCUSSION ON HOW TO CONDUCT LIBRARY BOARD INTFRVIFWS Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II. Mayor Alexander felt the interviews should be private as opposed to open to everyone to hear everything from everyone. He felt there should be a two person committee to do the interviews. Councilmember Williams felt pdvacy was important and did not like how they were done the last time. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested Diane O'Neal and someone else look at the applications and conduct the interviews. Mayor Alexander also volunteered to do the interviews. ACTION: Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Willjams to conduct the interviews. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MEFTING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC K1. COMCAST ACCFPTANCF OF CABLF INDUSTRY'S CUSTOMFR SFRVICF pI ~,N Jim Lawry of Comcast informed the Council about their customer service program that was launched March 1, 1995. He continued to explain the program in further detail. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about their boundaries. Mr. Lawry stated they are basically east of 19th in the Red Hill area. Councilmember Williams stated she felt this was great and was delighted to see something done so positive. She pointed out that residents cannot choose the cable company they want to service them. K2. Luis Munos, Mt. Baldwin Court and also representing the residents on this street, read a petition into City Council Minutes March 15, 1995 Page 7 K3. the record, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Robert Williams, member of the coalition, talked about the police dispatcher tolling Mrs. Williams they could not send a unit out because of being in the middle of a shift change. He stated there is a problem with crime on Mt. Baldwin Court. L. ADJOURNMFNT MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adjourn to March 22, 1995, 5:00 p.m. in the Td- Communities Room located at the Civic Centor for a joint meeting with the Chaffey College Governing Board. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjoumed at 9:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: March 22, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Joint Meeting with the Chaffey College Governing Board A. CALL TO ORDFR A joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Chaffey College Governing Board was held on Wednesday, March 22, 1995 in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez (arrived 5:30 p.m.), Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Boardmembers: James Barton, Kathleen Brugger, Paul Gomez and Paul Treadway. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager;, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Dr. Jerry Young, President Chaffey College; Steve Menzel, Vice President Human Resources for Chaffey College; and Debre J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Boardmember: Isabel Scully. Mayor Alexander stated that Bea Watson of Fontana was present to talk about an event for the Amedcan Red Cross to be held Sunday, March 26 in Ontario from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. and in Fontana from 5:00 to 9:00 p.m. Ms. Watson invited each person present to be involved with the telethon to help raise money for the Red Cross. B. ITFM OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS OF MUTUAL INTFRFST Mayor Alexander stated the purpose of the meeting is to meet jointly with the Chaffey College Governing Board. City Council/Chaffey College Joint Meeting Minutes March 22, 1995 Page 2 Boardmember Barton stated it is nice to be able to sit down with the Council to discuss matters of mutual interest. He stated he felt they are the largest business in the City. He stated they would like to help the City and vice versa in the business community, He stated they are working on the physical appearance of the college. He added the City and Chaffey College have had a good arrangement with the fields and that he is working with Jerry Fulwood on expanding these areas. He stated he was not sure if the median break on Haven in front of Chaffey College was safe. Councilmember Gutierrez arrived at 5:30 p.m. Boardmember Barton stated he had a copy of a plan from Banyan to Wilson that he wanted to show the Council that would indicate some improvements they would like to make. Mayor Alexander stated the Council wants to work with the College staff. He stated he did not know if the City has answers to some of the traffic concerns. He stated he appreciated his comments and suggestions. Mayor Alexander stated the City is concerned about the possibility of felons working at the College. Boardmember Barton stated they have heard some rumors about this and were not aware of this for a fact. He stated they have no program that works with the correctional process. He stated they are trying to get to the bottom of the rumors. Mr. Barton felt the crime rate on campus was down. Mayor Alexander stated he felt it would be a good idea for the Police Department to sit down with the faculty of the College. Dr. Young, Chaffey College, stated there are people who need scholarships to the school, but that their cdminal record is not checked. He stated the faculty is academy trained. He stated he felt they have a good relationship with the Sheriffs Department. Councilmember Curatalo asked if their faculty takes a report, is it reported to the Police Department. Dr. Young, Chaffey College, stated yes. Mayor Alexander felt it would be good for Dr. Young or his staff to meet with the Police Department to get all of the information on this matter. He suggested Captain Bieberdorf get in touch with Chaffy College. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City will get something going on this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he looks forward to working with Chaffey on future programs and was glad they could all sit down together tonight. He stated if there is anything the Council could do to help them, to please call. Boardmember Barton stated his Board is very cautious about safety and trying to do everything possible in this area. Councilmember Williams stated the College does have high quality standards and a sense of pride. She stated she is concerned about the traffic with the increased student load. Jack Lam, City Manager, offered the City's Engineering Department to work with the College planners on City Council/Chaffey College Joint Meeting Minutes March 22, 1995 Page 3 some of their changes. He stated any time the City can jointly purchase something with another agency, it will save everyone money. Boardmember Brugger felt joint efforts between the College and the City are good, but that she realizes that neither the City nor the College has extra money for things, She stated she was glad to hear Jack Lam say that the City is willing to work jointly with them on projects. Boardmember Barton stated he would like to eventually see drop-in youth facilities throughout the City and would like to see something at Chaffey College so the kids can use their facilities. He stated they are looking at using some of the high school facilities for some of their classes. Mayor Alexander asked if their enrollment was down. Boardmember Barton stated a small amount, but that it is higher than any other District. Mayor Alexander asked about how they get their funding. Dr. Young, Chaffey College, stated it depends on the enrollment. Mayor Alexander asked why if they are at their cap for funding do they still try to get more students to come there. Boardmember Barton stated it is their responsibility to offer an education at the lowest cost possibly. Boardmember Treadway stated they have come from a quarter system to a semester system which will help to reduce the attendance rate a little bit. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if most of the students that go there are from Rancho Cucamonga. Dr. Young, Chaffey College, stated most of the students are local and that the farther away they had gone to high school, the less likely it is they will go to Chaffey. Boardmember Brugger left at 6:10 p.m. Mayor Alexander asked if there was any chance of them getting more funding. Boardmember Barton stated they just keep applying for more grants. He stated financially they are doing okay, and have not had to borrow money from the State. Mayor Alexander asked if they could have a College Assessment District. Dr. Young, Chaffey College, stated it would take a two-thirds vote to do this, that it is very difficult to do. He stated it would cost the Board $200,000 just to promote this. Councilmember VVilliams left at 6:25 p.m. City Council/Chaffey College Joint Meeting Minutes March 22, 1995 Page 4 Boardmember Barton stated he would like to continue meeting with the Council on a regular basis. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to meet again in 60 to 90 days and bdng back some of these things and reach closure on them. He asked if they have plans of expanding their performing arts facility. Boardmember Barton talked about the planetarium and that they would like to expand. Councilmember Gutierrez stated if he knew about some of their events, he would like to go to them. Councilmember Biane stated some of the questions he had for the College Board have already been answered and that this meeting has been a learning process for him. Boardmember Gomez stated he wanted to be a good neighbor to the City and did not want there to be any cdme problems. He asked what the possibility would be for the City to pave some of their bad streets within the College or a joint contract service for a project like this. He stated he would like to discuss this at a future meeting. Mayor Alexander suggested that they meet together sometime in June. Boardmember Barton thought that would be a great idea. Mayor Alexander felt it was a good idea for the College to advertise events in the Grapevine. C, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC C1. Tom Wdght, U.S. Printing, stated he was interested in seeing what the two groups would discuss and that he is willing to give a discount to help on these projects. D. ADJOURNMFNT Boardmember Treadway announced that Boardmember Scully was not present due to illness. The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: Apdl 5, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetina A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, Apdl 5, 1995, in the Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Guljerrez, Diane VVilliams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager;, James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Rsdevelopment Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Karen Matcham, Recreation Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Ubrary Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Shirrl Griffin, Secretary; Joi Simpson, Office Specialist II; Jill Ecoff, Records Clerk; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District;, Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS BI. PresentaUon of a Proclamation declaring Apdl 5, 1995 as Records Management Day. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamaUon to Jill Ecoff and Shirr'l Griffin. B2. Presentatbn of a Proclamation declaring April 9 lhroUgh 15, 1995 as National Library Week celebrating the theme 'Americans Can't WaiL' Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Deborah Clark and Robert Howdyshell. Deborah Clark stated over 270,000 items have been circulated since opening day. Mayor Alexander lelt at 6:42 p.m. City Council Minutes April 5, 1995 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBUC C1. Don Donnelly of Rancho Cucamonga stated he felt the citizens are concerned about the utility tax and the Council's commitment to changing it. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/t 5/95 for ~e total amount of $355,41323. D2. Approval of Extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-0t2T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D3. Approval of the Environmental Inilial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Calaveras Avenue Sl~'eet Improvements between Ninth Street and Arrow Route and issuance of a Categorical Exempljon therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 95-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IvIPROVBvlENT FOR CALAVERAS AVENUE BETWEEN NINTH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE D4. Approval of map, execulion of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Secudty and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. t and Street I.lgh6ng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 14208, located on the north side of Base Line Road west of AIta Cueeta Drive, submilted by Mr. Ralph G. Riltenhouse. RESOLUTION NO. 95-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14208, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 95-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET UGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14208 D5. Approval to order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street I_ighling Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 94-37, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of 4th S'a'eet, submil~ed by Pacific Gulf Properlies, Inc. City Council Minutes Apdl 5, 1995 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 95-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. l AND 6 FOR CUP 94-37 (APN 21 0- 071-56) D6. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 95-013) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Wells Fargo Guard Service for providing security atthe Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park and Quakes Stadium. D7. Approval to accept the !viiliken Avenue Exl~nsion betNeen Feelhill Boulevard and Arrow Route Project, Contract No. 94-044, as complete, release the bends and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Complelion and approve the final contract amount of $1,488,860.72. RESOLUTION NO. 95-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D8. Approval to accept the Milliken Avenue Grade Separalion, Slope and Drainage Modfficalion Project, Contract No. 94-075, as complete, release the bends and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Complelion and approve the final contract amount of $89,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. g5-03g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION, SLOPE AND DRAINAGE MODIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D0. Approval to accept the 8alina Avenue Street Improvements between Calavera$ Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue Project, Conffact No. 94-076, as complete, release the bends and authorize the City Engineer to file a Nolice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $179,383.30. RESOLUTION NO. 85-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENT8 FOR SAUNA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERA8 AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carded 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). City Coundl Minutes Apdl 5, 1995 Page 4 No items were submitled. I:. CONSENT ORDINANCI:R No items were submilled. F. ADV;RTISFD PUBI ~C HFAJ~JNGS No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAG;R'S STAFF RFPORT8 I. COUNCIl BUSINESS I1. REQUEST FROM THF CHAMBFR OF COMMFRCF TO PRFSFNT A RFSOLUTION RFGARDING THE UTILITY USER'8 FFF Gary Chri~an, President of the Chamber of Commerce, read a Resolution into the record, which is on file in the City Clerks office. He added this was approved by the Chamber Board on March 8, 1995. He stated when you consider all of the benefits the firefighters get, they are very rich employees. He stated he hoped the Council is not using the utility tax money for the firefighters salary. Mayor Pro Tem Gu'derrez stated the Council is committed to lowering the utility tax, but that he didn't know how much dght now. Mayor Pro Tem Gutierrez opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council was: Dave Jones, Air Liquide, disl~ibuted information to the Council and explained it to them. He stated they are supporting the community, but felt they are being singled out compared to everyone else. Ede Swistock, Schlosser Forge, asked that the Council make the utility tax fees more equitable and that the burden not lie on the larger businesses alone. He complimented staff for their cooperation in the expansion of his company's business. John Wyomoto stated he supported the Chambers Resolution. He asked that the Council live up to their promises about the utility tax reduction. There being no further comments, public comments were closed. City Council Minutes Apdl 5, 1995 Page 5 Coundlmember Willjams stated she felt the flint way to reduce the utility tax was not to take the action they just previously took tonight. She felt what was done tonight was very sad and that this is deficit spending and did not agree with it. Councilmember Curatalo stated he is against taxes, but felt public safety was very important. Councilmember Biane stated he would like to address the business community and that something will be done about the utility tax. Mayor Pro Tem Gutierrez stated Amen to what had been said and stated the Council is committed to examining the tax and to possibly take action on it. J1. Stores will have on the City. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEM8 FOR NFXT MEETING Councilmember Curatalo stated he would like a report from staff about the impact the Ontado Mills K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBI ~C No communicaljons were made from the public. L ADJOURNMFNT MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adjoum. Motion carded unanimously, 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). The meeting edjoumed at 7:15 p.m. (Note: the Executive Session to discuss Labor Negotiations will be discussed at the next meeting). Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: Apdl 19, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reaular Meetincl A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, Apdl 19, 1995, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present ware Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Ingdd Blair, GIS Supervisor; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael and Deputy Chief Bob Corcoran, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proteddon District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Mayor Alexander introduced Supervisor Jon MikeIs who would make a presentation. Supervisor MikeIs stated after AB 939 was approved, the County added a small amount in the tipping fee that is paid for the source reduction and recycling element that is required to cover the cost of the waste characterization study. Out of the revenue generated County-wide from this, the County paid for all of the studies that ware required through fie cries and the County ilself. He stated there was a little bit of a remainder from that total County-wide account and was here to present the City with a check in the amount of $180,000. The Presentations were given in the order of 136, B5, B1, B3, B7, B2, B4, and B8 but the minutes will remain in agenda order. B1. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing April 23-29, 1995 as Nalbnal V'mtirns Week. Proclamation was presented to Rick and Heide Foes. Mr. Foes stated his son was murdered in his home in 1981 and alter that he organized the Parents of Murdered Children Organization. He thanked the Council for its support. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 2 B2. Presentation of Proclamelon recognizing April as National Volunteer Month and Apdl 24-30, 1995 as National Volunteer Week. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Susan Mickey. Susan Mickey thanked the Council and City Manager for their support of the program. B3. Presentation of Proclamation designating April as Fair Housing Month. Proclamation presented to Omar Baraza. Mr. Baraza thanked the Council for its support of their work. 134. Presentalion of Proclamation to Jacqueline Bolda for her oLdstanding service to the community on both the Park and Recreation Commission and the Ijbrary Board of Trustees. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Jackje Bolda. B5. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the contributions for the Adopt A Wall Program. Proclamation was presented to Cynthia Shelley from the Adopt-A-Wall program. Cynthia Shelley thanked the City for its support. B6. Spedal presentation to Keith Keene for his help in apprehending taggem. Mayor Alexander presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Keith Keene for his help in apprehending taggem. Mr. Keene stated he is very proud of the City and believes in the City. He wants to keep it clean and felt this was a good program. B7. Proclamation presented to Ma. Rogers to recognize National Day of Commitment to Eliminating Racism on Apdl 26, 1995. B8. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, gave an update on the work of the Route 30 Task Force which was distributed to the Council. The Council asked vadous questions about this project. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Keith Keene commended the City for responding to a recent request for help to get graffiti removed so quickly. C2. Dawn Hall slated she had been to the Coundl asking for assistance for a reward fund to get the people who murdered her son and thanked them for their help in getting this started. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 3 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Items No. D18, D19, and D20 should be corrected to reflect the public headng date of May 3 not May 17. D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/22/95, 3/29/95 and 4/5/95; and Payroll ending 3/23/95 for the total amount of $2,077,323.05. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 1995. D3. Approval to authorize the Adverlidng of the 'NoUce Inviling Bids' for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Ughling at the Intemectlon of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, to be funded form TDA Afficle 8, Account No. 12-4637-9401. RESOLUTION NO. 95-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND AUTHORIDNG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to adopt Government Access Channel Guidelines and Policy. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY BIANE. D5. Approval to set special lax for Community Fadlitles District No. 88-2 (Dminege and Law Enforcement) No Increase in Levy. RESOLUTION NO. 95-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) DS. Approval of Resolution setabiishing an annual leW ~ the Alta Lama Channel Distdct No. 84-2, The Sklh SITset Induslzial Park Refund District No. 82-1 R, The Rancho Cucamonga Dminege District No. 86-2 an Milliken South of Arrow District No. 8g-1. No Increase in LaW. RESOLUTION NO. 95-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CI.r../dvtO~ RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSE~ SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS D7. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Fadlilies District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Dminege System). No Increase in Levy. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABUSHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COIVlvlUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) D8. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facililjse District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). No Increase in Levy. RESOLUTION NO. 95-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) D~. Approval of Summary Vacalion of Flood Inundalbn Areas for Development Review 94-08, located on Tacoma Drive approximately 600 feet east of White Oak Avenue within Parcels t0 and t 1, modified Lot Line Adjuslment No. 382, of Parcel Map No. 12959-1. RESOLUTION NO. 95-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SU!vt4ARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-FLOOD INUNDATION AS SHOWN ON PARCELS 10 AND tt, MODIFIED PER LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. 382, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1 D10. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Sirset Improvements and Dedicaljon of Rights- of-Way between the property ownera (see attached list) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the constmclion of Ninth Street Between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 95-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS (SEE ATTACHED US'I'), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D 11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securilies for Tract 135655 thin Tract 13565-10, located north of 24th Street and east of Wardrnan Bullock Road and release of previously submitted Improvernent Agreemmds and Improvement Securiljes accepted by the County of San Bemardino on January 9, 1989 and bansifted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 30, 1989, both submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 95-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND MPROVEkf. NT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU TRACT 13565-10 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ON JANUARY 8, 1989 AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON OCTOBER 30, 1989 City Council Minutes April 19, 1995 Page 5 D12. Approval to execute the Improvement Agreement and Security, and ordering be Annexation to Landscape Maintenance [:)kffict No. 3B and Slmet Ughling Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 6, for Development Review 94-16, generally located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ameron, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 95-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 RESOLUTION NO. 95-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-16 D13. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 95-014) for Touch Pad System at East and West Beryl Parks to Western Power Systems for the amount of $43,055.00 ($39,150.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Landscape District No. 1 Account No. 40-4130-7043. D 14. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Nonce of CompleUon for Tract t 3280 located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Sb'eet) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 528,420.00 52,842.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D15. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Nob of Completion for Tract 13890-2 located on Lemon Avenue north of Highland Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Accept Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $178,000.00 t7,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT8 FOR TRACT 13890-2 AND AUTHORIZ]NG THE RUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes April 19, 1995 Page 6 D16. Approval to accept a Failhful Performance Letter of Credit for a slope planling, accept Improvements, Release Letter of Credit and Notice of Completion for DR 92-11, located at 9400 Almond Sb'eeL Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $26,260.00 (Equestrian Trail) Accept: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit 1,000.00 (Slope Planting Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit 52.52.00 (Equestrian Trail) RESOLUTION NO. 95-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 92-11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Nob of Completion for DR 93-20, located on the southeast comer of Arrow Route and Red Oak Sb'ooL Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street') $ 20,400.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 93-20 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D18. Approval of Preiminary Engineers Report and Seffing of the Public Hearing for May-47- May 3, 1905 to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal year 1995/g6 and approve the Engineers Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). RESOLUTION NO. 95-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PREUMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLUTION NO. 05-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND UGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO DI 9. Approval of PmiminaW Engineer's Report and Setling of the Public Hearing for May-~7- May 3, 1995 to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1 g95/96 and approve the Engineers Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nce. 12., 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. City Council Minutes April 19, 1995 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 95-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2. 3A. 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 95-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR t g95/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND UGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D20. Approval of Prelim~ary Engineers Report and Selling of the Public Headrig for May--~7- May 3, 1995 to levy the annual amessmenls for Fiscal Year 1995/96 and approve the Engineers Reports for S'o'eet Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 95-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 95-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAIv~NGA, CAUFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET UGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND UGHTING ACT OF t972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the st. aft reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of item D4, and with Gutierrez abstaining from voting on Item D2. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. Councilmember Gutierrez expressed his appreciation to Joe O'Neil for his work in not having to increase the assessments. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4. Approval to adopt Government Access Channel Guidelines and Policy. Councilmember Biane felt this should be discussed before the Cable Subcommittee and then come back to the Council for approval. MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by GLdierrez to continue Item D4 to the May 3 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 8 No items were submitted. No items were submitted. No items were submitled. F. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADV;:RTISI:D PUBUC HEARINGS G. PUBI ~C HFaJtJNGS H. CITY MANAGER'$ STAFF RFPORTS Ht. CONSIDFRATION OF COMMERCIAL 1 AND USE AND MARKFT STUDY Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Dave Barker, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated the Commission is in favor of this program. Councilmember Gutjerrez asked if this would slow down the process. Dave Barker, Planning Commission, stated it would not slow the process down, but would make it more efficient. Councilmember Gutierrez felt this would delay future development on Foothill if this study takes place. Jack Lam, City Manager, staled this is an opportunity to look at some changes. He stated this study would not delay any proposed projects. He stated there is a state law on how long a project can take to get through the process. He stated it is the intent to have a total look throughout the C.,ity. Coundlmember Guljerrez asked if Mr. Lam could guarantee that development would not slow down if this study takes place. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Council would make the decisions on proposed projects. Dave Barker, Planning Commission, stated the Planning Commission is going out of their way to assist the developers. Councilmember Williams commented on all of the new development in the City. She felt the study should cover commercial and other areas throughout the City, including the housing component. Brad Buller, City Planner, felt by the end of May the contract proposal could be accepted by the consultant and would then come back to the Council in June for approval. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 9 Coundlmember William stated she would like to be able to give input on this also. She stated she hoped this would be computedzed so a site could be pulled up to show someone through this method. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this would be included. He also reiterated this study would not slow up development. Councilmember Biane felt the Council should give Mr. Buller direction at the joint meeting with the Planning Commission on this matter. Jim Frost stated he agreed with the request as submitted by the Planning Commission. He felt the General Plan should be looked at. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see the City go forward with this. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to go forward with the study and approve the allocation up to $50,000. Motion carded unanimously, 50. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the scope of services could come back at the Apdl 26 joint meeting so that it can move forward as quickly as possible to stay on schedule. I. COUNCIl BU$1NF:RR I1. DISCUSSION OF PROGRAMS USED BY CITIES AND INTFRFSTED pARTIF$ IN OFFERING AND MAINTAINING A RFWARD PROGRAM (Continued from February lS, 1995) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmember Curatalo stated he would volunteer to be on the committee. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to establish a reward program, with Councilmember Curatalo to serve as part of the committee. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. 12. RECOMMENDATION FOR PARK & RFCREATION COMMISSION VACANCY (Oral Report) Mayor Alexander stated he and Councilmember Williams interviewed applicants for the Park and Recreation Commission and that they were very impressed with them. They suggested that the Council appoint Jim Clopton and Massie Hazegh. Councilmember Williams suggested when the letters go out that they ask the applicants to still stay involved in the community. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to accept the Subcommittee's recommendation. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. J. IDFNTIRCATION OF ITFMS FOR NI:XT MFFTING No item were identified for the next meeling. City Council Minutes Apdl 19, 1995 Page 10 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIC No communications were made from the public. L ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to recess to Executive Session to discuss Litigation per Govemment Cede RCV 059489, Gentry Brothers vs City of Rancho Cucamonga; and Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Robed Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the Meet and Confer process. Executive Session to adjourn to a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on Apdl 25, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. not to reconvene. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adam, CMC City Clerk Approved: May 3, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re~lular Mee~ng A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeljng of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 3, 1995, in the Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The mee~ng was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Coundlmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwoed, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Cindy Norris, Assodate Planner; Cathy Mords, Planning Technician; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Se~ces Director; Mary Kuhn, Personnel Analyst I; Ingdd Blair, GIS Supervisor; James Frost, City Treasurer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protedjon District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B 1. Presen~on d Pmclamabn Design~ the Week of M~ 1 ~20, 1995 as Histodc Presewa~on Week. Mayor Alexander presented the pmclama~on to Brad Buller, C~ Planner. C1. C2. C3. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Don Kurffi distributed a letter which was read into the record and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Trisha Heraera, student at Stork School, spoke about the importance of the D.A.R.E. program and how much she enjoyed it. Carol Phillips also commented on the D.A.R.E. program and what she had heard about possible cutbacks with the program. She talked about the benefits of the program and felt it was so important and should not be cut out. She stated they would like some guarantee that the City will put money into the program. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 2 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there are three school districts who have committed to continuing with the program and felt any contact with legislators was beneficial for expressing her concern. Ms. Phillips stated she heard that Alta Loma School District will not continue the program. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he has not heard that, butthat she should talk to their Board. He stated he has talked to Assemblyman Brulte and that he feels the money set aside for this program should be used for that purpose. C4. Craig Hemler commented on the ardcle in the newspaper about the party at Supervisor Jon MikeIs home. He asked if the City is going to by to recover the money for the Police Department's efforts to stop this. Jack Lam, City Manager, and Mayor Alexander stated there is nothing that the City is doing at this time to recover any costs. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Rancho Cucamonga does not have a nuisance recovery policy at this time, but that the Police Department is looking at something to present to the Council in the future. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City does not have anything in place to recover the costs and commented that only four cffies that he works with have something to recover costs for nuisances. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: February 15, 1995 March 1, 1995 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/12/95, 4/20/95, and 4/26/95; and Payroll ending 4/20/95 for the total amount of $1,133,365.55. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 1994/95 Fiscal Year Pavement Rehabilitation Program Phase II at vadous locations, to be funded from Account Nos. 01-4640-9400 and 10- 4637-9113. RESOLUTION NO. 95-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 1994/95 FISCAL YEAR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM PHASE II AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to authorize the adveffising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Calaveras St. Street Improvements, from Ninth Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from CDBG Account, Account No. 28- 4333-9115 City Coundl Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 95-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CALAVERAS ST. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM NINTH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval of Parcel Map and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 14457, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, submitted by TSG Partners, a California Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 95-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14457 RESOLUTION NO. 95-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 14457 D6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street I_ighting Maintenance Nos. I and 6 for Conditional Use Permit No. 93-13, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue approximately 200 feet south of 8th Street, submitted by E. & R. Rancho Pacific, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 95-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-13 RESOLUTION NO. 95-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-13 D7. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for Tract 14486, located at the north side of Arrow Route at Ramona Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee $ 440.00 Cash Deposit (Street) D8. Approval to accept the Metrolink Station Phase I Improvement Project, Contract No. CO 94-025, as Complete, Release the Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $2,959,726.10. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE METROLINK STATION PHASE I IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items were submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATE PLAN. THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1995/96 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN - The review and adoption of the Federally required Consolidated Plan which covers the five-year peded for FY 1995-1999, the Annual Action Plan for FY 1995/96, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a grant of $1,024,000 and $37,644 in Program Income, and review of required amendments to the City's Federal Ciljzens' Parljdpation Plan. Staff report presented by Cindy Norris, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public headng. Addressing the City Council were: Betty Davidow, Inland Mediation Board, thanked the City for their support and talked about their program. Dennis Marcello, Executive Director Boys & Gids Club, talked about their program and how it involved the youth. He stated they are geffing Block Grant funding from two other cities. Coundlmember Curatalo asked if they were to receive funds from Rancho Cucamonga, what would they be used for. Mr. Marcello, Boys & Girls Club, stated staff. Cathy Rogers and Brenda Weaver of the YWCA spoke about the "Pact Program" and the "Y Teen Program". IVliam Gandell, Foolhill Family Shelter, talked about their program and what it had to offer. She asked that the Council consider their program for funding. Barbara Hope, Director of the House of Ruth, thanked the Coundl for their support. She also talked about their program. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 5 Donald Harrier, Pomona Valley Council of Churches and West End Hunger - SOVA, talked about his program. Lee Stanisone, Homeless Outreach, talked about their program. Coundlmember Williams stated she would abstain from this matter because she has an assodation with one of the applicants. She continued to leave the meeting room until the item had concluded. Coundlmember Curatalo felt the total public service figure should be looked at and increased to 7% and given to the youth organizations. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he would like to see about $10 - 15,000 taken off of the home improvement amount. He felt there should be a way to fund a couple more organizations. Mayor Alexander commented on the amount of money the City has put into youth programs. He suggested that Coundlmembers Curatalo and Gulierrez sit down with staff and include Frank Geary of the Daily Bulletin, to come up with the final amounts and consider some of the other organizations. Don Donnelly stated he cares about the human needs of people. He did not think that people should be forgotten. He stated he liked Councilmember Gutierrez's idea. Jim Frost felt the Council should look at the dollars instead of the percentages. RESOLUTION NO. 95-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN INCLUDING THE FINAL SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to continue the item to May 17 in order for Coundlmembers Curatalo and Gutierrez to work with Planning staff on the amount allocated. Motion carded 4-0-0-1 (Williams abstained). Mayor Alexander called a recess at 8:45 p.m. members of Coundl present. The meeting was called back to order at 8:58 p.m. with all ITEMS F2, F3 AND F4 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME. F2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2, 3A, 3B, 4.5, 6. 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 6 Coundlmember Williams asked about the tot lot in Landscaping Distdct 5, that last year the residents did not want it and what was their posffion now. Joe O°Neil, City Engineer, stated the person against it last year has now moved. He stated they are trying to make contact with someone in that neighborhood for any concerns they might still have. Councilmember Biane thanked the Engineering staff for their work on not increasing the assessments. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it is because of the efforts of the Council and the City Manager. Councilmember Curatalo agreed with Councilmember Biane. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public headng was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 95-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 95-069. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. F3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 12, 3.4. 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 (No Increase of Assessment Rate if Proposed) See Item F2 for discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 95-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 95-070. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. F4. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) See Item F2 for discussion. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 95-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85--PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) MOTION: unanimously, 5-0. Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 95-071. Motion carded No items were submitted, No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL GUIDELINES AND POLICY Staff report presented by Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I. Councilmember Gutierrez asked when they might start seeing messages. Susan !Vlickey, Management Analyst I, stated equipment has been ordered to get it read, and that it should be soon. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adopt the policy. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identffied for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Mayor Alexander stated that Don Donnelly had asked to be informed of any budget meetings scheduled. Councilmember Williams stated she already gave him that informatjon. City Council Minutes May 3, 1995 Page 8 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Labor Negotiations per Government Cede Section 54957.6 to give Robed Dominguez, Administrative Services Dired. or, direction in regards to the Meet and Confer process. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. not to reconvene. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: %, .,l' :::),~o T I ~,~ .J 0 ^ ~ V~ vO ~° Z ~ %; · , o5/09/1995 CITY OF {0 CUCAIK]NGA PORTFOLIO MASTER SUI{~ARY APRIL 30, 1995 CITY CASH AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATUP. ITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BOOK VAI~JE PO~FOLIO fERN MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of DeZxmit - Bayuk ...............$ I~l A~ncy Investment }~m~ ................ $ Fderal A~ncy Issues - Coupon ............... $ ~easury Securities - Coupon ................. $ ~easury ~curities - Discount ............... $ ~gage ~d ~curities ................... $ Small ~iness Administration ................ $ 13,419,566.50 26.89 412 261 5.514 5.591 16,342,819.24 32.74 I 1 5.853 5.934 16,950,915.63 33.96 913 743 6.936 7.032 272,845.00 0.55 1,180 853 6.569 6.660 1,437,795.60 2.88 364 59 5.242 5.314 386,007.11 0.77 6,452 3,601 8.940 9.064 1,101,562.50 2.21 9,131 5,929 8.184 8.298 TOT~ INVEST}{ENTS alld AVERAGES .............$ 49,911,511.58 100.00% 689 488 6.191% 6.277% Passbook/Checking Accounts ...................$ 1,742,279.73 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 99,343.01 TOT~ CASH and PUI~'~{ASE INTEREST .............$ 1,841,622.74 TOTAL CASH and INVEST){ElflS .................$ 51,753,134.32 MON~q{ ENDING FISCA~ TOTAL EARNINGS APRIL 30 YEAR TO DATE Current Year $ 389,534.29 $ 2,105,855.17 JAMES C. FROST TREASURER · DATE ' I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and is in comformity with investment policy adopted July 20, 1994. A copy of this investment policy is available in the Finance Division of the Administrative Services Department. ~he Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures. o~ /o9 /1995 CITY OF RANCliO CUCANDNGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS ' INVESTMENTS APRIL 30, 1995 CITY CASll BIVESTNENT P~CRASE STATED ---YTM--- ~TURITY DAYS N~!eER ISSUER DATE ]K~ VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00941 BANK OF AMERICA 04/03/95 127,921.00 127,921.00 127,921.00 2.800 2.800 2.839 05/04/95 3 00942 BANK OF AHERICA 04/04/95 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 2.800 2.800 2.839 06/06/95 36 00937 FOOTHILL INDEP BANK 04/06/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 7.180 7.082 7.180 04/09/97 709 00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.600 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 105 00918 GREAT WESTERN 11/15/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 11/27/95 210 00927 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 01/25/96 269 00930 GREAT WESTERN 02/15/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 08/16/96 473 00931 GREAT WESTERN 03/01/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.250 6.250 6.337 03/04/96 308 00932 GREAT WESTERN 02/23/95 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6.750 6.750 6.844 08/21/95 112 00936 GREAT WESTERN 03/29/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.800 5.800 5.881 09/25/95 147 00894 SAMWA 04/29/94 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.250 4.250 4.309 05/02/95 1 00924 SANIdA 12/28/94 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 606 00933 SANWA 02/23/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 665 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 13,419,566.50 13,419,566.50 13,419,566.50 5.514 5.591 261 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 15,229,819.24 15,229,819.24 15,229,819.24 5.934 5.853 5.934 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 5.934 5.853 5.934 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 16,342,819.24 16,342,819.24 16,342,819.24 5.853 5.934 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00895 00896 00897 00922 00925 00939 00940 00943 00938 00921 00926 00935 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 04/29/94 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 05/05/94 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 05/05/94 FEDERAL HONE LOAN BANK 12/19/94 FEDERA]~ H(Y/a~ LOAN BA]FK 12/28/94 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/06/95 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/06/95 FEDERAL ]K)ME LOAN BANK 04/26/95 FEDERAL ]KNE LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/06/95 FEDERAL NATL WTG ASSN 12/21/94 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/29/94 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/22/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 1,W0,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.160 5.089 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 5.850 5.870 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 8.030 8.030 1,065,134.38 1,090,000.00 1,065,134.38 6.360 7.789 965,156.25 1,000,000.00 965,156.25 4.570 6.727 942,968.75 1,000,000.00 942,968.75 5.240 6.939 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 8.045 8.045 1,002,031.25 1,000,000.00 1,002,031.25 7.420 7.226 1,981,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,981,250.00 7.050 7.564 1,998,125.00 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 7.700 7.752 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 7.010 7.010 5.850 04/29/96 364 5.160 05/01/95 0 5.952 04/29/96 364 8.142 12/19/97 963 7.898 09/19/96 507 6.821 12/30/96 609 7.036 11/30/98 1,309 8.157 04/26/00 1,822 7.326 09/23/99 1,606 7.669 10/10/96 528 7.859 12/10/96 589 7.107 03/21/97 690 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 16,950,915.63 17,090,000.00 16,950,915.63 6.936 7.032 743 TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON 00903 TREASURY NOTE 06/08/94 272,845.04) 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.569 6.660 08/31/97 853 7 05/09/1995 CITY OF RANC!{O CUCAMONGA INVES~ENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVI~ENTS ~RIL 30, 1995 CITY CASH INVESTMENT PURLqLx. SE STATED --- ~ --- MATURITY DAYS {ER ISSUR DATE INDOK VALUE FACE VALL'E MAII~,ET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE ~ BT TP, RASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00907 TRRASURY BILL 06/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,502,486.10 5.040 5.242 5.314 06/29/95 59 ~RTGAGE BACKEl) SECURITIES 00071 FEI)EP, AL !{(3{{E ~AI{ ~ 02/23/87 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 09/21/87 O0(N)2 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 07/01/87 00069 GOV~ NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 07/01/87 68,866.45 70,701.54 442,~7.10 8.0(0) 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,439 154,428.84 167,176.01 612,753.80 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,604 132,707.59 134,557.76 663,389.28 8.500 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,208 30,004.23 29,412.53 84,710.58 9.000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,147 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 386,007.11 401,847.84 1,803,760.76 8.940 9.064 3,601 SMALL ~SINESS AI){4INISTP, ATION 00004 SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN 07/25/86 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.GO 1,~5,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 5,929 TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVEPAGES $ 49,911,511.58 50,046,233.~ 51,357,535.62 6.191% 6.277% 488 05/09/1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN - 4 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - CAR{ CITY APRIL 30, 1995 CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE STATED ---TEN--- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHEWING/SAVINGS ACCO(INTS 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS 1,742,279.73 2.(N)O 1.973 2,000 99,343.01 1,841,622.74 o51o911995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PORTFOLIO MMTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE APRIL 1, 1995 - APRIL 30, 1995 CITY CASH STATED TRANSACTION ~ES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT I ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWAI. S BAi. ANCE CEFYIFICATES OF DE'POd;IT - NANK 00929 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 04/04/1995 00934 NANK OF AMERICA 2.800 04/03/1995 00941 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 04/03/1995 042)942 BMIK OF ~ERICA 2.804) 04/04/1995 00937 F(X)TI{I~ INI)~ Bj~NK 7.180 04/06/1995 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 127,921.~ 1,791,645.50 2,000,000.00 3,919,566.50 B[INNIN(i {: 1,791,645.50 127,921.00 1,919,566.50 11,419,~6.50 13,419,566.50 LC)CA/~ AGENCY INVFSI'MEIF[ { (MXN)5 ~ AG~CY INVST FUNI) 5.934 00804 LOC3U~ AGENCY IBfVST FUN1) 5.934 S~TO TAI~ and ENDING BALANCE 244,780.46 244,780.46 UGIHI~BA/.,AN~: 2,4~,00().~ 2,400,000.00 18,498,038.78 16,342,819.24 C:H~I[/SAVI~S ACCOUNTS 00180 ~ OF AIqRICA 3,709,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCE: 2,228,500.04) 261,779.73 1,742,279.73 FEDERM~ AGEN~ I~U~ - C043PON 00939 FEI)ERA. L H~E LC)H BANK 4.570 00940 FEI)ERkL HOME LOH BANK 5.240 00943 FF./)FJ),A]~ HC)I4E ~AN NANK 8.045 00938 FEDERAL HOM]~ LOAN MC)RTG. L'D~. 7.420 S~TOTALS and ENDING BAUdiCE o4/o6/1995 04/o6/1995 04/26/1995 04/o6/1995 965,1~.25 942,968.75 2,(X)O,O00.O0 1,002,031.25 4,910,156.25 BEGINNING BALANCE: 12,040,759.38 16,950,915.63 TREASURY SECURITIES - CC){31~)N BEGINNING BALANCE: 272,845.00 272,845.00 TP, EAS~Y SECURITIES - DISC~D43NT 00892 TI{EASIIRY BI~ 4.370 04/06/1995 BEGIHI'NG BALANCE: 1,913,085.56 3,350,881.16 1,437,795.60 M<)~GE ~CT, IED SECURITIES 004)71 FEI)EIL~L HOME LOAN ~ 8.000 00203 FEDERAL NATL ~ ~N 8.500 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 SUBTCYT~ and ENDING B~iANCE 04/15/95 04/25/95 04/03/95 BEGINNI~ BALANCE: 2,000.05 721.06 4,103.25 6,824.36 392,831.47 386,007.11 /0 o5/o9/1995 CITY OF RAIlClIO CIEAII6A PORTFOLIO MASTER INVES~ ACTIVITY BY TYPE APRIL 1, 1995 - APRIL 30, 1995 CITY C~ STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT { ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE SPh~L BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE: BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,101,562.50 1,101,562.50 $ 47,338,264.52 12,783,503.21 8,467,976.42 51,653,791.31 // RECEIVED /~PR 0 5 1995 Depa. rli:pd~bqO4k~Yl~)cllBeverage Control 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 ~ve~ide, CA 92501 (9~) 782~ DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (TAr different from premise address) If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor' s names/license: .,/rY OF RCAiNCHO CUCAMONGA TY CLERK APR 04 1995 FOR RLCOHOL BEUERRGiZrI / EIiI q[I 3:P 2/3,41516/ File Number ............ 307198 Receipt Number ......... 1028217 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date Issued Date RIVERSIDE 1ST Have you ever been convicted of a felony.'? NO 10451 LEMON AVE STE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO YES P O BOX 2037 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91729 HOLIDAY WINE & SPIRIT CO INC 231458 License TYpe Transaction Tvoe Fee Tvoe Ma~ter DUD Date Fee 1. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 MAR 31,1995 $1274.00 2.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA NA YES 0 MAR 31,1995 $100.00 3.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 MAR 31,1995 S446.00 TOTAL $1820.00 Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoho~c Beverage Control Control Act, or regulations of the department penmmng to Me Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall bc decried part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all thequalifications of a licensee. and (b) that ne wm not violate or cause or permit to 0e violareel any ol me provtslons ol me Alconouc Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date MAR 31,1995 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appean below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the N)plicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing applicauon, duly authorized to m this application on its behalf; (2) that be has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements thc~in made are true; (3) that no person other than the apphcant or applicants has any direct or indirect intercat the applicant or applicanfs business to be conducted under the license(s) for which d~is application is made; (4) that the sfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day n which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establis a preference to or for any ¢:~editor or transferor or m defraud or injure any creditor o sfetor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the appli r the lic~nsee ' ~esulting ~abifity to the Deltetment . Applicant Name - " Applicant Signature(s) b~o or t~ ,,,l~ . - ]DHILLON T '~S / ]DHILLON T HINDER ABC 211 (9;93) LICENSE ACTION REQUEST 1. NAME I{OL.IDAY k'INE & SPIR~ CX)., INC. 3. DBA HOI.TDAY ~ ~i~P{R~ ~. 5. ~I~S ~ Cl~ ~0 ~P 9197 ~acraZ Ave. H NontcZa~r 9]763 APPLICATION TO TRANSFER LICENSE 7. Transfe Io: TERRY DILLON STARE OF CAL~-OeqN~A O~PAR?ldIN'rOFALCONCIJCBLcyERACd=CQen-R(3. 2. ABC LICENS~ NUMBER 21~231458 4. DISTRICT OFFICE 07 RIVERSIDE 6. LICENSE ATTACHED [] Yes .I'Xl No Under penalty olr pet3ury, each person wbose ughorate appem below. ccmfies and says: (I) He is the licensee. Or an execuo',e office of the coqxtue licensee. named m the foeegolng applicanon. duly auehoflzed ro make thins transfer applicanon on its behalf: f2~ that he bef~by makes applicanon Io sun'ender all rotemet in the Nllched license(s) ~c~.c..-tbed below a~d to transfer same to the appiir. a~t and/Or IDeanon mdiclted oll Ule upper portion of this applicanon form. a( SUCh tom, fee ms approved by the Dimcmc. (3) that the Innslet ipplicnnofi of proposed t3"~fel' i$ not made to sansly die peytnetal of a loan Or to fui~ll an at~n! entt~d into m ~ nmne~, day~ pl~ceding the amy on which the I/-ialfef l. pplicanon is filed wirk the Department or to gNU mr establish a ptefetemce to Or for any creditor of ulnsfetor Or to defraud Or mnlm any creditor of transfuoc (4) mat the transfor a$91icano~ my he wutlxlt.awn by either the apphcant or the licgnM~ wtlb no tesuRmI liabili~ to the Deplrmlent. .....,...,.-., ,' ~ Holiday [dine & Sp-'_rit Co., · Signed By: Henry S, Chavin/Sec, Treas, Name(m) of Licensee(s) d. CANCELLATION [] Immediately [] Upon Issuanc~ [] Other: I voluntarily cancel my license because [ am no longer in business. reactivated or reinstated, I SURRENDER - Rule 65 [] Immediately [] Upon Issuance I"1 Other. I understand 10. DATE my license cannot be I11. HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER ( ) I voluntarily surrender my license for a period of not more than one year. [ intend to [] Transfer [] Reactivate the license. I understand that the license must be renewed at the dine renewal fees are due or the license will be automatically. revoked. I further understand that the Department will proceed to autornadcally cancel my license at the expiration of the one-year period if not transferred or reactivated. 13. DATE CLOSED { 14. SIGNATURE 15. DATE ~ 16. HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER X ( ) 12. MAILING ADDRESS REQUEST FOR SURRENDER OF RETAIL LICENSE FOR'TEMPORARY PERMIT UNDER SECI'ION 24045.5Co) OF THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ACT 17. SURRENDER DATE I 18. TEMPORARY PERMIT NUMBER I 19. EFFECTIVE DATE I 20. EXPIRATION OATE 21. TRANSFEREE Important Notice to Llcensee All licenses sauvB,,~ed will he anmmmicdly evdrtd if Ihe reetwal ~ ace not plid. My change of mmlinl eddmus shall he rt~ to me Di~qct Office. The sun~ndefed license will he automatacaJly cancelled upon tansleg to te mnlmra~ pentuliP If I~e tnm~s' applicNio~ is denied Or withdrawn: (a) If the ransfefor meacLs m ~ ~ of dee I~'''.'d buainml he tnu~ t~lunt the ~ d ~ sunendend lics'n*o and establish ~ ~ ~ beams no chortle in the ownen~tp Or dM quaJiticanoos of the lln.~.,,,.4 pt,.neema (b) If {he transferot does no4 ranlend to mmalme o~ranom of ,k.. lictnsed business and does nm equ~t t~um of the sun~ndeted license then the Deptmsent will proceed to hold the license under the ptovusloas of Ride 6S. T'ne effeclD~ da0e of Rule 65 m will be me dale of a!~. dental Or wtthdr'm. aL APPLICATION FOR: [] Temporary Rotaft Permit [] Duplicate license: [] Caterers Permit [] 09 Importers Ucense [] Controlled Access Cabinet [] 12 Importers License [] Portable Bar License [] Private Warehouse I 22. I/We have tad ~e foregoing ud kaew the coote=U meteor. SIGNATURE X IFOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY AgG-Z~I (t2/93} [] Premises Abandoned [] Manager NAME: [] Food Lessee NAME: iTEL~NUMerdq [] Leuer Attached Requesting Surrender or Cancellation j24. DATE [] Omer. k SIT PLAN N HOLIDAY WINE & SPIRIT CO. INC. 10451 I-F-MON AVE. SUITE 'A' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Property Currently Zoned: Neighborhood Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: Medium Residential South: Low Medium Residential/Office East: Neighborhood Commercial West: Low Residential Commercial Professional RECEIVED c ,. t r ~ o .. ~ A ~ Pt OW RC~/NCHO CUCAMONGA TY CLERK RECEIVED __ APR O i 1995 LTi ~ ~; xo; ui 121 i~ 2131.4/s16J city RLCIHOL BEUERRGE LICENSE(S) TO: I::>¢partmeat of Alcoholic Beverage Coa~ol 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 RIVRRSIDR File Number ............ 306480 Receipt Number ......... 1024936 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 3-9-95 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING I_DCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License 'l'vDe 8038 HAVEN AVE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO CA 91730 MAKARABIROMYA RASMEE 212127 Transaction TYPe Fee Tv~e Ma~ter DUD Date Fee 1.47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA PERSON TO PERSON TRAMS P40 YES 0 MAR 09,1995 $1250.00: 2.47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA ANNUAL FEE P40 YES 0 MAR 09,1995 S695.00: 3.30 TEMPORARY RETAIL P TEMPORARY PERMIT NA YES 0 MAR 09,1995 $100.00: 4. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 MAR 09,1995 $78.00: TOTAL $2123.00 Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Control Act, or regulalions of the department pertaining to the Act7 NO Have you ever been convicted of a felony? NO Explain any "Yes" a~swer to the above quesuons on an attachment wMch shall be deemed pan of this apphcanon. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to he violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date MAR 09,1995 N~licam CmlMWBmO~. ~ame¢l in the fO~lmal q~licalmet t, aly au~ to make this ~1~ . (2) that he h~ M~I ~ foct'lOinl ~ lr4~ws the c~omauthemof~:lt,Mxeachofl~egovell~emea~lhe~immmleBetl~e;(3) li~t~°Per~ee°em'e'""l~g iic~¢~al~lica~uh~mYdim~eciudimctin~i" the lieant o¢ licaa,'a b~igeu ',', be c,M, lmcml ~ the liceme(,) f~ i tl~ ~:!icaUee is mate; (4*~mm t~e mmdw lic~o~ ~ tmader is Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ICI-IUWATTHANAKUL JARUWAN 2'*"""""' ~ IKAMz'ja~q4~jT.4t_~¥f: NIVES ~ ~--.~t,/.-'' ~ A~C 211 (9R3) i-n /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May17,1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. Oq'qeil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, JUST WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 14 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 14-4 158-7044 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the Construction of a Bus Bay on the North Side of Arrow Route, Just West of Haven Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $20,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 24 and May 31, 1995, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, June 21, 1995. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O~qeil City Engineer WJO:MDL:sd Attachment so ,u'no o.o70-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, JUST WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Construction of a Bus Bay on the North Side of Arrow Ronte, Just West of Haven Avenue." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEAl ,El3 BIDS OR PROPOSAl ,S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, Califomia, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on June 21, 1995, sealed bids or proposals for the "Coustmction of a Bus Bay on the North Side of Arrow Route, Just West of Haven Avenue" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of a Bus Bay on the North Side of Arrow Route, Just West of Haven Avenue." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Induswial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro- visions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registere~ apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Conlxactor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workmart, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies fumished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to famish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 el. seq.) and roles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the fight to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of June 1995. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, this 17th day of June 1995. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: May 24 and May 31, 1995 DATE: TO: FROM: BY': SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector REJECT ALL BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER REHABILITATION AS NONRESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO IMMEDIATELY REBID THE PROJECT. RECOMNIENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council reject all bids for the construction of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Rehabilitation, and authorize staff to immediately rebid the project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action. bids were received and opened at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 2.1995. At~.er review of bids received, it was noted that the apparent low bidder, Protection Service Industries. had bid on only one contract item. The second apparent low bidder, J.R. Hinckley & Associates, proposed to subcontract 90% of the project. This is in violation of Section 2-3. Subcontracts, paragraph 5, page 32, 1994 edition of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. The third and fourth proposals exceeded the budget by $20,000. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O~ell~f fl City Engineer WJO:MDL:sd Attachment ~ZZZZZZ Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $20,000.00 FROM FUND 14, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE JUST WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE. It is recommended that City Council appropriate $20,000.00 from Fund 14, Air Quality Improvement Grant for construction of a bus bay on the north side of Arrow Route just west of Haven Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Recent engineering studies has shown the need for the subject bus bay. The proposed bus bay is on the north side of Arrow Route just west of Haven Avenue. With dual left mm lanes onto Arrow Route ~'om northbound Haven Avenue traffic, it becomes dangerous for vehicles mining left from the outside left turn lane on Haven Avenue as they enter Arrow Route if a bus is stopped on Arrow Route just west of Haven Avenue. The Air Quality Improvement Grant was authorized by AB 2766. The legislation causes the Department of Motor Vehicles to set aside funds collected from Motor Vehicle registration fees for local agencies to use in reducing vehicle emissions. Construction of bus bays will reduce trip reductions since it provides for transit and/or walking opportunities for commuter travel. The appropriation of these funds from the tindesignated fund balance of Fund 14 - Air Quality Improvement Grant will not adversely impact any ongoing projects approved by City Council in the FY 94/95 Budget. Respec~~~~ William J. O~ieil City Engineer WJO:MO:ly Attachments r~ Z 0 3F~N3AV N3AVH ~ ~ ' "' 'b, 2',, \'~\ · o.,~,×~ ..;% ~.~]~ .~.~'~, 25_~30'5b 'NC S ON,ccC_S 5'~ /' ,.."~. /~"i' '~.: ,/'j I · ' :' NOlS S~8 IN~O ea~ao3a~ 1~.· .' , / '1 "'~' xO:S Sn8 ,NnOI z I' '.- ' . .,.~ - .. , , · ~, · '1 xC S ON'ccC._S ONi~ ; " I~; '1"'... '~ . "M'S M3N NI938 O0+L~ V~S I ~ T I QNIISIX] NIOP 'S3VAO~B8,0~ ~ g 'AVE SR8 NIO38 833 6g'g~+Q~. VIS z ' I " r,Q · Z + (N Z .<~ ). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Susan M. Stark, Finance Officer AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION Approve all fiscal year 1994/95 budgetary adjustments for all City funds, General and Special Revenue. BACKGROUND When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated revenues and appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs. In general, estimated revenues and expenditures have been adjusted to reflect a more realistic level of activity in all funds. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and expenditures which digresses from the direction Council has requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the year. The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year budgeted revenues and expenditures, the current year's (1994/95) adopted budget amounts, and the 1994/95 recommended adjusted amount in each account area. Respectfully submitted, Susan M. Stark Finance Officer Attachments sms:wp~nndbd95 REVENUES I' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FRTIMATFD RFVFN|JF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 -- 104,887 112,592 115,010 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMENDED BUDGETED BUDGETED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1995 GENERAL FUND 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 0t -3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 (1) TAXES 1020 1030 1040 1060 1065 1075 1080 1100 1110 1185 1190 1800 4550 4551 4552 4553 Property Tax - C/Y secured Property Tax - C/Y unsecured Prop Tax - P/Y eec & unsec Property Tax - penalties/interest Supplemental Taxes Unitary Tax Utility Users Fee Sales & Use Taxes Prop 172 112 Cent Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Admissons Tax Property Transfer Tax Franchise Fee - Gas & Electric Franchise Fee - Residential Refuse Franchise Fee - Commercial Refuse Franchise Fee - Cable TV 1,309,370 1,322,080 1,252,880 82,660 83,650 99,120 72,200 73,060 151,330 58,260 58,260 55,000 60,180 60,180 15,000 0 0 100,000 3,150,000 5,600,000 5,600,000 6,953,040 7,505,760 7,775,000 0 148,600 148,600 8,000 96,000 96,000 3,000 0 0 200,000 200,000 250,000 1,260,000 1,205,770 1,250,000 628,400 630,000 825,000 597,500 650,000 700,000 252,000 375,000 442,650 Total Taxes 14,634,610 18,008,360 18,760,580 01-3900 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 (2) LICENSES & PERMITS 2200 Business Licenses 2220 Bicycle Licenses 2290 Building Permits 2300 Other Licenses & Permits 781,530 800,000 800,000 250 250 100 575,000 585,000 700,000 7,000 4,660 7,500 Total Licenses & Permits 1,363,780 1,389,910 1,507,600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FgTIMATFD RFVFNi IF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 112,592 115,010 ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 (3) FINES & FORFEITS 2460 2461 2472 2473 3450 Vehicle Code Fines Parking Citations Vehicle Release Fee Citation Proof of Correction Fee General Ordinance Fines 139,000 84,950 0 0 6,000 100,000 90,000 0 0 10,000 t90,000 85,700 45,000 100 14,000 Total Fines & Forfeits 229,950 200,000 334,800 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 (4) MISCELLANEOUS 4610 7910 7950 8520 8523 Interest Earnings Re RDA Loan Sale of Printed Materials Returned Item Charge Other Revenue Recyclable Material 300,000 51,650 300 10,000 200 300,000 50,000 300 10,000 100 300,000 72,000 300 10,000 0 Total Miscellaneous 362,150 360,400 382,300 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFD RFVFN!IF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 -- 104,887 112,592 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR CODE DESCRIPTION 1993 - 1994 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 (5) INTERGOVERNMENTAL 01-3900 01-3900 01-3901 5230 Motor Vehicle in Lieu 4,036,000 5250 Homeowners Property Tax Relief 19,600 5338 Off Highway License Fees 2,250 3,693,710 20,000 2,250 3,693,710 22,000 2,000 Total Intergovernmental 4,057,850 3,715,960 3,717,710 (6) CHARGES FOR SERVICES 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 0t-3901 01-3901 01-3901 1186 Finger Print Fees 13,000 1200 D.A.R.E. Program Reimbursement 52,830 2400 Candidates Filing Fees 0 3455 False Alarm Fee 14,000 7260 Plan Check Fees 355,000 7280 Planning Fees 200,000 7290 Engineering Fees 662,000 7300 Disaster Prep. Special Program Fees 39,160 7310 Planning Dept- Special Program Fees 13,000 7320 Community Services Special Program Fees 13,060 7330 DARE Program Promotions &Contributions 5,820 7340 Building & Safety Special Services Fees 0 Total Charqes for Services 1,367,870 13,000 89,610 3,600 2,000 350,000 250,000 414,000 39,200 10,000 26,340 2,000 10,000 1,209,750 13,000 89,610 3,600 10,000 370,000 250,000 480,000 34,000 3,000 14,200 5,500 20,000 1,292,910 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FRTIMATFD RFVFNIIF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 112,592 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE ACCOUNT FISCALYEAR CODE DESCRIPTION 1993-1994 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 (7) OTHERS 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 8522 Non-Abated Reimbursements 35,350 8523 Special District Reimbursement 699,680 8524 Reimbursement From RDA 2,112,930 8525 Fire District Payroll Abatement 115,720 8530 Reimbursement From Other Funds 230,990 35,000 666,700 2,314,720 150,920 324, 110 52,000 696,860 2,101,580 164,010 399,110 Total Others 3,194,670 3,49t,450 3,413,560 ~bd3 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 25.~10.880 28.375.830 29.409.460 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F. ITIMATFn RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 115,010' BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 02-3900 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 02-3901 LIBRARY 1020 Rancho Cucamonga Library Property Tax 1504 Community Room Rentals 1505 Direct Mail Solicitations 1506 Library Card Sales 1507 Library Fines & Fees 1508 Media Rentals 1510 Pdvata Contributions 1511 Public Library Foundation 7910 Sale Of Printed Materials Total Library Fund 994,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 994,800 935,560 100 6,000 700 44,000 23,000 2,000 20,300 2,300 1,033,960 03-3901 03-3901 03-3901 Reimb. State & County Parking Cit. Surcharge 2462 State Park Cit. Surcharge 2463 County Jail Park Cit. Surcharge 2494 County Court Park Cit. Surcharge Total Stte & County Parking Cit Surchg Fund 6,500 3,300 3,300 13,100 3,500 2,500 2,500 8,500 3,500 2,500 2,500 8,500 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 05-3901 p5-3992 Sports Complex 2465 Activity Revenues/Concessions 2466 Activity Revenues/Special Event Rental 2467 Activity Revenues/Admissions Tax 2468 Activ|ty Revenues/Stadium Lease 2469 Activity Revenues/Recreation DepL Prog. 2470 Activity Revenues/Parking Fees 2471 Activity Revenues/Maint Services 2474 Stadium Security Reimbursement 8520 Other Revenue 8524 Reimbureementa From Redev. Agency 8000 Tranfers In (from General Fund) Total Sports Complex 200,000 30,000 100,000 50,000 298,320 40,000 0 0 0 631,760 0 1,350,080 164,000 9,000 148,000 190,000 360,870 73,300 0 0 0 0 129,500 1,064,670 164,000 17,060 158,860 190,000 360,870 58,600 83,530 50,000 333,330 0 142,730 1,648,980 RelmbursementalCCWD 06-3901 5891 Reimbursements/CCVVD 93,020 103,110 194,650 Total CCVVD 93,020 103,110 104,650 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F- TIMATFD RFVFN!IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = t04,887 ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION t 12,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 t15,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 ReimbursementalCal Trans 07-3901 5891 ReimbursementslCal Tran 59,610 15,940 15,800 Total Cal Trans 59,610 15,540 15,800 Reimbursement: San Bemardino County 08-3901 5891 Reimbursement/County of S.B. 83,600 102,150 102,250 Total County San Bemardino 83,600 102,150 102,250 Gas Tax 2106, 2107, 2107.5 09-3901 4600 09-3900 5110 09-3900 5130 09-3900 5150 09-xxx, x xxxx Intersst Earnings State Gas Tax - 2106 State Gas Tax - 2107 State Gas Tax - 2107.5 Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total Gas Tax 2106, 2107, 2107.5 39,100 0 1,306,110 10,000 1,256,470 2,611,680 25,000 375,000 745,000 10,000 261,510 1,416,510 15,000 375,000 835,000 10,000 480,750 1,715,750 10-3900 10-3901 10-xxxx GAS TAX 2105 - PROP 111 5140 Ga~ Tax 2105 - prop 11t 4600 InteNt Earnings xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total Tax 2105 - Prop 111 520,000 18,440 925,890 1,454,330 494,990 10,000 697,780 1,202,770 675,000 15,000 697,780 1,387,780 12-3901 12-Xxxx SB325rI'DA ART.8 4600 Intersst Eaminge xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Totel SB325rrDA ART. 8 25,800 644,280 670,080 8,000 0 8,000 10,000 0 10,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FsTIMATFn RFVFN! IF SPECIAL REVENUEFUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 13-3901 13-xxxx Recreation Services 7710 Recreation Fees xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total Recreation Services 672,240 0 672,240 752,920 41,120 794,040 752,920 41,730 794,650 14-3901 14-3900 14-xxxx 16-3900 18-3900 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT 4600 Interest Earnings 5001 Air Quality Improv Grant Revenue xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total Air Quality Improv. Grant Pedestrian Grants/Article 3 5180 Pedestrian/Bicycle Sidewalks Total Pedestrian Grants/Article 3 FETSIM Grant 5880 Fetsim Grant Income Total FETSIM Grant 3,400 135,000 0 138,400 86,930 86,930 13,850 13,850 0 135,000 21,990 156,990 56,780 56,780 3,000 135,400 21,990 160,390 4,000 4,000 19-3901 19-3901 Drainage Facilities/Etiwanda 4600 Interest Earnings 7485 Storm Drain Fees Total Drain. FacilitieslEtiwanda 0 22,600 22,600 360 0 360 360 10,000 10,360 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F,qTIMATFIn RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS t990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION 112,592 115,010 AMENDED BUDGETED BUDGETED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1995 Park Development 20-3901 7730 Park Development Fees 550,000 475,000 475,000 Total Park Development 550,000 475,000 475,000 21-3901 21 -xxxx Beauti~cation 7780 Beautification Fees xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance 171,130 135,500 150,000 0 230,290 230,290 Total Beauti~cation 171,130 365,790 380,290 22-3901 22-3901 22-3901 22-xxxx Systems Development 4600 Interest Earnings 7431 Transportation: Development Fee 7432 Transp.: Emergency Vehicle Fee xxxx Transfers In 9,870 5,870 10,000 520,000 575,000 1,200,000 5,000 3,000 12,000 740,000 457,810 0 Total Systems Development 1,274,870 1,941,680 1,222,000 23-3901 23-3901 Drainage Facilities/General City 4600 Interest Earnings 7480 Storm Drain Fees 210 0 0 81,990 120,000 60,000 Total Drainage FadGeneral City 82,200 120,000 60,000 I.S.T.E.A. (FAU) 24-3900 6750 Federal Highway Grants 4,088,450 2,720,000 350,000 Total FAUISLTransportation Program 4,088,450 2,720,000 350,000 :2~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFI~ RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 Capital Reserve 25-3901 4600 Interest Eamings 195,000 100,000 152,160 Total Capital Reserve(CapProjFund) 195,000 100,000 152,160 26-3900 R.Z'Berg Grant 5890 R.Z'Berg Gent Total R.Z'Berg Grant 29,090 29,090 29,090 29,090 27-3900 1988 Conservation Grant 5880 1988 Conservation Gent Revenues Total 1988 Conservation Grant 276,000 276,000 269,600 269,600 269,600 269,600 28-3901 Grants - CDBG 5880 CDBG Reimbursements Total Grants - CDBG 1,219,620 1,219,620 1,179,010 1,179,010 1,094,260 1,084,260 31-3901 Park Bond Act - 1986 6885 Park Bond Gent 11986 Total Bond Act - 1986 17,510 17,510 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFn RFVFN!IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010' BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 32-3900 32-3900 32-3901 32-xxxx Measura I - Transportation Revenue 5000 Measure h Local Street Allotment 6000 Measure h Specific(Arterial ) Projects 4600 Interest Income xxxx Transfer In From Fund Balance Total Measure I 595,900 3,710,000 20,120 0 4,326,020 550,000 3,500,000 10,000 0 4,060,000 570,000 5,000,000 15,000 0 5,585,000 33-3901 33-3901 Special Districts' Administration 8520 Other RevenuelSprecial Diet_ Transfers In 4600 Interact Income Total Special DisL Admin. 432,270 8,750 441,020 439,100 5,000 444,100 439,100 447,740 34-3901 Public Resources Grant 5880 Public Resources Grant Income Total Public Resources Grant 246,250 246,250 239,850 239,850 239,850 239,850 35-3901 35-3901 SB 140 Grant 5880 SB 140 Grant Income 4600 InteNt Income Total SB 140 Grant s50,oo0 430 555,430 625,000 500 625,500 1,003,720 0 1,003,720 36-3901 STATE PROP 108: PASSENGER RAIL & CLEAN AIR BOND ACT OF 1990 5200 St_Prop.108 Pass. Rail Bond Act Revenue Total State Prop. 108 684,210 684,210 1,351,910 1,351,910 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F, TIMATFn RFVFNI IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS pOPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 40-3901 40-3901 40-3901 40-3901 40-3901 40-xxxx Land Maint Dst #1 General 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings 8520 Other Revenue xxxx Transfer In From Fund Balance Total LMD #1 794,710 24,770 4,950 16,320 1,500 34,500 866,750 947,040 20,510 4,100 17,600 7,800 183,140 1,080,990 801,240 35,450 7,090 17,600 8,690 183,140 1,053,210 41-3901 41-3901 41-3901 41-3901 41-xxxx Land Maint Dst #2 Victoria 1020 Property Tax o C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer In From Fund Balance Total LMD #2 1,437,600 58,580 11,720 30,160 372,780 1,910,940 1,537,600 48,500 9,700 31,920 518,760 2,146,480 1,572,720 50,990 10,200 31,920 518,760 2,184,590 42-3901 42-3901 42-3901 42-3901 42-xxxx LMD 3A Prkwy So. of 6th E. of 1-15 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer In From Fund Balance Total LMD #3 3,.290 20 20 70 5,830 · 9,230 1,950 900 180 60 1,260 4,350 2,620 900 180 70 1,260 5,030 43-3901 43-3901 43-3901 43-3901 43-xxxx Land Maint Dst #4 Terra Vista 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer In From Fund Balance Total LMD 14 1,022,810 5,000 1,000 20,580 507,580 1,556,970 920,080 54O t10 18,410 452,160 1,391,300 1,003,580 8,000 1,600 20,260 452,160 1,485,600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFrl RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 44-3901 44-3901 44-3901 44-3901 44-xxxx LMD #5 NE Comer 24th & Hermosa 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Eamings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LMD #5 4,950 20 20 100 6,020 11,110 4,680 90 20 100 0 4,890 4,990 110 20 100 0 5,220 45-3901 45-3901 45-3901 45-3901 45-xxxx Land Maint Dst #6 Caryn Comm 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LMD ~6 260,990 6,280 1,250 5,370 181,730 455,620 262,940 5,990 1,200 5,400 63,060 338,590 268,960 8,590 1,720 5,590 63,060 347,920 46-3901 46-3901 46-3901 46-3901 46-3901 46-xxxx Land Maint Dst #3B General Industial Area 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings 8520 Other Revenue xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LMD #3B 327,160 18,160 3,630 6,980 0 169,620 525,550 421,070 14,710 2,940 9,610 41,500 228,980 718,810 411,510 35,000 7,000 9,490 21,110 228,980 713,090 47-3901 47-3901 47-3901 47-3901 47-xxxx Land Maint Dst #7 North Etiwanda 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & InteNt 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LMD #7 244,390 13,280 2,650 5,210 0 265,530 266,970 10,520 2,100 5,590 118,740 403,920 273,030 22,130 4,420 5,990 118,740 424,310 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F- TIMATFI RFVFN!IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = t04,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 48-3901 48-3901 45-3901 48-3901 48-xxxx Land Maint Dst #8 South Etiwanda 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LMD #8 15,770 140 30 320 3,750 20,010 15,540 130 20 310 1,940 17,940 15,710 130 20 320 1,940 17,220 55-3901 55-3901 55-3901 55-3901 55-xxxx Lighting Dist #1 Arterial 1020 1040 1060 4600 Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LD #1 355,910 9,140 1,830 7,340 0 374,220 388,510 7,570 1,510 7,950 10,350 415,890 395,880 11,120 2,220 3,500 10,350 423,070 55-3901 55-3901 56-3901 56-3901 56-xxxx Lighting 1020 1040 1060 4600 XXXX Dist #2 Residential Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LD #2 219,520 4,890 980 4,510 43,470 273,370 231,280 3,960 790 4,720 18,520 259,270 236,050 9,040 1,8t0 1,000 18,520 266,420 57-3901 57-390t 57-3901 57-3901 57-xxxx Lighting Dist #3 Victoria 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LD #3 152,990 4,870 970 3,180 0 162,010 170,060 4,030 810 3,500 4,630 183,030 180,870 3,140 630 800 4,630 190,070 55-3901 58-3901 58-3901 58-3901 58-xxxx Lighting Dist #4 Terra Vista 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & InteNt 4600 InteNt Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LD #4 128,250 540 110 2,580 99,360 230,940 88,010 490 100 1,770 13,510 103,880 88,300 710 140 3,000 13,510 105,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F-qTIMATF=n RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUEFUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1994-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995 59-3901 59-3901 59-3901 59-3901 59-xxxx Lighting Dist #5 Caryn Comm 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance Total LD #5 40,300 190 40 810 31,710 73,050 36,870 160 30 740 17,560 55,360 37,680 1,270 250 780 17,560 57,540 60-3901 60-3901 60-3901 60-3901 60-xxxx Lighting Dist ~6 Industrial Area 1020 1040 1060 4600 XXXX Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer in From Fund Balance Totel LD ~6 39,360 1,030 210 810 0 41,410 48,720 040 170 990 7,070 57,790 52,950 540 170 990 7,070 62,020 61-3901 61-3901 61-3901 61-3901 61-xxxx Lighting Diet #7 North Etiwanda 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance 17,110 670 130 360 0 18,530 560 110 380 4,340 18,040 560 110 750 4,340 Total LD #7 18,270 23,920 24.700 62'3901 62'3901 62'3901 62'3901 62'XXXX Lighting Diet #8 South Etiwanda 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer in From Fund Balance 6,040 20 20 140 0 6,630 20 10 130 0 6,630 20 10 200 0 Total LD #8 7,120 6,790 6,860 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F, ,TIMATFrl RFVFN!IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO.OF ARROW(St & Drainage Imprv) CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 63-3901 4600 Interest income 8,000 3,300 3,300 Total AD 89-1 Cap Proj Fund 8,000 3,300 3,300 AD 89-1 Milliken S. Of Arrow Street & Drainage Improy. REDEMPTION FUND 64-3901 64-3901 94-3992 1020 Property Tax: C/Y Secured 4600 Interest Income 8000 Transfers IN: From Fund 65 Total AD 89-1 Redemption/Agency Fund 499,800 9,900 0 509,700 490,650 3,000 40,000 533,650 362,710 3,000 40,000 405,710 AD89-1Milliken S. Of Arrow Street& Dreinagelmprov. RESERVE FUND 65-3901 4600 Interest Income 65-xxxx xxxx Transfers Out: To Fund 94 Total AD 89-1 Reserve Fund/Agency Fund 40,000 0 40,000 42,000 (40,000' 2,000 50,000 (40,000'. 10,000 Intergovernmental Service 72-3901 4600 Interest Eamings 72-3901 9002 Usere Fees 72-xxxx xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total IGS Fund 18,270 458,680 0 476,950 160,000 385,940 220,000 765,940 120,000 388,740 0 508,740 73-3901 Benefit Contingent 4600 Interest Earnings Total Benefit Contingent Fund 16,000 16,000 40,000 40,000 24,000 24,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F-qTIMATFn RFVFN!IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 CFD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highland 75-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 0 35,000 Total CFD 88-2 Cap Proj Fund 0 35,000 76-3901 76-3901 76-3901 76-3901 76-xxxx 76-xxxx CFD 88-2 Flood District(Redemp. Fund) 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer Out: To Fund 78 xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total CFD 88-2 FId Dist/Agency Fd 393,150 5,410 1,080 7,990 0 21,860 429,490 257,150 42,860 8,570 6,170 (240: 0 314,510 350,910 33,400 5,010 6,650 {240: 0 395,730 78-3901 78-3901 78-xxxx 78-xxxx AD 88-2 Law Enforcement (Redemption Fund) 1020 Property Tax - CN Secured 4600 Interest Eamings xxxx Transfers In From Fund 76(240) & Fund Bal(16, xxxx Transfer Out: To General Fund 01 Total CFD 88-2 Law EnflAgency Fd 240 10 0 · 0 25O 0 10 240 0 250 0 110 240 0 350 80-3901 80-xxxx AD84-2 Alta Loma Channel I Improvement Fund 4600 InteNt Earnings xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total AD 84-2 Improvement Fund 140 4,800 4,940 200 0 200 560 0 560 81-3901 81-3901 81-3901 81-3901 81-3992 81-xxxx AD 84-2 Alta Loma Channel I Redemption 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & InteNt 4600 InteNt Earnings 8000 Transfers in: From Fund 82 xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total AD 84-2 Redempt/Agency Fd 183,700 2,750 550 2,860 0 0 t89,860 152,140 8,180 1,940 3,500 12,690 12,980 191,130 194,940 11,710 3,510 2,600 8,670 0 191,130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F- TIMATFD RFVFNI IF SPECIAL REVENUEFUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS t990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1996 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 82-3901 82-xxxx 82-xxxx AD 94-2 Alta Loma Channel I Reserve 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance xxxx Transfers Out: To Fund 81 5,030 0 0 13,000 0 (12,690'. 5,550 3,120 (8,670'. Total AD 94-2 Reserve/Agency Fd 5,030 310 83-3901 83-xxxx AD 82-1R 6th Street Industrial 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance Total AD 82-1 Cap Proj Fund 12,000 5,490 17,490 3,000 55,270 58,270 4,290 19,590 23,880 86-3901 CFD 94-1 Day Creek 4600 Interest Earnings Total CFD 94-1 Cap Proi Fund 45,000 45,000 41,000 41,000 33,710 33,710 87-3901 87'3901 87'3901 87'3901 87'3901 87'XXXX CFD 94-1 Day Creek I Redemption 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1940 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings 7906 Contributed Capital - RDA xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance Total CFD 94-11A.qency Fund 960,430 7,500 1,500 17,850 962,290 0 1,949,570 894,400 26,700 5,340 20,000 976,210 0 1,892,650 813,190 11,630 2,330 20,000 976,2t0 63,190 1,886,550 88-3901 PD 85 Heritage 4600 Interest Earnings Total PD 85 Heritage Cap Proj Fd 510 510 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F.qTIMATFr RFVFNI IF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1964 115,010~ BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 19644-1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1964 - 1995 89-3901 PD 85 Red Hill 4600 Interest Eamings Total PD 85 Red Hill Cap Proj Fd 1,640 1,640 90-3901 90-3901 90-3901 90-3901 90-3901 90-xxxx PD 85 Red Hill & Heritage I Redemption 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings 8520 Other revenue xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance Total PD 95 RedemplAgency Fund 1,568,050 76,420 15,280 33,300 5,000 33,120 1,731.170 1,495,310 61,890 12,380 31,890 25,000 0 1,626,470 1,530,710 61,890 12,380 10,000 25,000 0 1,639,980 91-3901 PD 85 Red Hill & Heritage I Reserve 4600 Interest Earnings Total PD 85 Reserve/Agency Fd 22,000 22,000 20.000 20,000 16,320 16,320 93-3901 93-3901 93-3901 93-3901 93-xxxx AD 82-1R 6th St. Industial I Redemption 1020 Property Tax o C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 InteNt Earnings xxxx Transfers In: 6/95-From Fd 94; '96=From Fd Ba Totel AD 82-1 Redemp/Agency Fd 572.210 1.000 200 10,640 0 564,350 730.540 9,510 1,900 15,000 8,000 764,950 668.930 70.000 10,080 12,170 8,000 769,180 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F TIMATFn RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 94-3901 94-xxxx 94-xxxx AD 82-1R 6th St. Industial I Reserve 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance xxxx Transfers Out: To Fund 93 Total AD 82-11A.qency Fund 8,000 0 0 8,000 10,000 0 (8,000: 2,000 11,260 0 (8,000: 3,260 95-3901 95-xxxx AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance Total AD 86-2 Cap Proj Fund 4,000 232,020 236,020 3,000 218,880 221,880 6,490 15,780 22,270 96-3901 96-3901 96-3901 96-3901 96-xxxx AD 86-2 R/C Drainage Distdct I Redemption 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured 1060 Penalty & Interest 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In: 6195=From Fd 97; '96=From Fund Total AD 86-2/Agency Fund 200,260 2,000 400 3,410 0 206,070 192,870 3,640 730 2,500 3,280 203,020 183,380 5,910 1,480 1,970 4,000 196,740 97-3901 97-xxxx 97-xxxx AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District I Reserve 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Trensfera In From Fund Balance xxxx Transfers Out: To Fund 96 2,500 0 0 2,500 780 (3,280' 4,880 0 (4,000' Total AD 86-2/Agency Fund 2,500 880 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F~TIMATFn RFVFN!!F SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCALYEAR 1993-1994 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 109-3901 110-3901 125-3901 125-3901 131-3901 Metrolink Maintenance & Security Program 5880 Grant Income Total Mstrolink Maint. & Secudty Program Fund: Used Oil Recycling Grant 5880 Grant Income Total Used Oil Recycling Grant: CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace 1020 Property Tax: Current Year Secured 4600 Interest Earnings Total CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace Fund: AD 93-1 Masi Commerce Center 7441 Developer Participation Fee Total AD 93-1 Masi Commerce Center TOTAL SPECIAL FUNDS 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 74,340 0 0 74,340 0 432,210 432,500 0 8,650 4,320 34.038.550 0 440,860 436,820 0 5,000 15,000 0 5,000 15,000 32.707.740 33.684.580 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS (INCLUDES FUND 01) 59.249.430 61.083.570 63,094.040 EXPENDITURES L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F TIMATFr FXPFNnlTIIRF ACCOUNT NUMBER FUND 01 FUND 02 FUND 03 FUND 05 FUND 06 FUND 07 FUND 08 FUND 09 FUND 10 FUND 12 FUND 13 FUND 14 FUND 16 FUND 18 FUND 19 FUND 20 'FUND 21 FUND 22 FUND 23 FUND 24 FUND 26 FUND 27 FUND 28 FUND 32 FUND 33 FUND 34 FUND 35 FUND 36 FUND 37 FUND 40 FUND 41 FUND 42 FUND 43 FUND 44 FUND 45 FUND 46 FUND 47 FUND 48 FUND 55 FUND 56 FUND 57 FUND 58 FUND 59 FUND 60 FUND 61 FUND 62 FUND 63 DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND GENERAL LIBRARY REIMB/STATE COUNTY PRKG CIT SPORTS COMPLEX CCWD CALTRANS AGREEMENT S.B. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AGREEMENT GAS TAX 2106, 2107 & 2107.5 PROPOSITION ! 11 TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS COMM SRVCS-RECREATION AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PED.GRANT/ART.3 FETSIM GRANT DRAINAGE / ETIWANDA PARK DEVELOPMENT BEAUTIFICATION FUND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE: GEN'L CITY F.A.U. / ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM R-Z'BERG GRANT FUND 1988 CONSERVATION GRANT C.D.B.G. FUND MEASURE ! SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN PUBLIC RESOURCES GRANT SB 140 STATE PROP 108: Passenger Rail & Clean Air Bond Act of 1990 S.B.Cnty. MEASURE l: COMMUTER RAIL LMD #1 GENERAL LMD #2 VICTORIA LMD #3A PRKWY SO. OF 6TH ST. E.OF 1-15 LMD ~4 TERRA VISTA LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA LMD ~6 CARYN COMMUNITY LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA SLD #1 ARTERIAL SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL SLD #3 VICTORIA SLD 04 TERRA VISTA SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY SLD ~6 INDUSTRIAL AREA SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW / IMPRVMT 25,210,880 0 13,100 1350,080 93,020 59,610 83,600 2,611,680 1,464.330 670,080 662,970 133,990 86,930 13,850 15,690 502,830 86,550 1,147,130 81,700 3,719,890 29,090 276,000 1,219,620 4.365,810 408,570 246,250 555,000 0 0 866,750 1,910,840 9,230 1,556,970 11,110 455,620 525,550 234,490 20,010 323,140 273370 159,400 230,840 73,050 37,780 16,760 4,590 0 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 27,778,190 984,800 8,500 1,064,670 103,110 15,540 102,150 1,416,510 1,202,770 676,410 794,040 156,990 55,000 0 0 441330 365,790 1,041,680 67,480 2,253380 29,090 269,600 1,179,010 4,006,090 428,550 239,850 625,000 684,210 0 1,080,990 2,146,480 4350 1391300 2,870 338,590 718,810 403,920 17,040 415,890 259,270 183,030 103,880 55360 57,790 23,920 4,750 0 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 28,427,550 911,210 8,500 1,245,650 104,650 15,760 102,320 1,659,020 1,410,890 1,115,950 794,650 157,220 4,000 0 6,500 468,810 205,500 1,550,990 100,540 438,040 0 55,200 1,088,860 5,823,090 436,200 49,250 873,740 1.~51,910 ! ,455,700 1,135,350 2,380,420 4,350 1,160,710 2,870 410,850 789,690 396,170 18,650 415,890 259,270 183,030 104,160 55,550 58,010 24,070 4,750 127,920 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FS;TIMATFr FXPFNr')IT!!RFS 1993-94 ACCOUNT ADOPTED NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND FUND 64 AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW / REDEMP. 499,800 FUND 72 INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: Equip. Replacement 0 FUND 75 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV. 0 FUND 76 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV.:Flood 429,490 FUND 78 AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT 240 FUND 80 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROV. 4,940 FUND 81 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: REDEMPTION 184,210 FUND 82 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVE 0 FUND 83 AD 82-1R 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL: 1MPROV. 17,490 FUND 87 CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK REDEMPTION FUND 1,885,750 FUND 90 PD 85 RED HILL &HERITAGE: REDMPT 1,731,170 FUND 93 AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: REDEMPTION 584,350 FUND 95 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: IMPROV. 236,020 FUND 96 AD 86-2 P,/C DRAINAGE DIST.: REDMPT 191,050 FUND 109 METROLINK MAINT. &SECURITY PROGRAM 0 FUND 110 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 0 FUND 125 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 0 FUND 131 AD 93-1 MASt COMMERCE CENTER 0 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 504,920 504,050 220,000 230,500 0 23,570 292,430 213,710 240 0 0 150 191,130 258,420 0 100,880 58,270 19,590 1,886,550 1,886,550 1,587,870 i ,603,670 571,900 571,900 221,880 22,270 190,160 190,160 96,020 96,090 0 74,340 432,210 432,210 5,000 15,000 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 57,582,260 59,456,560 63,636,470 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F TIMATFn FXPFNnlT!IRFS ACCOUNT NUMBER 014110 014110-1100 014110-1900 014110-3100 014110-3300 014110-3900 014110-3960 014110-6028 014110 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 36,000 12,600 12,250 500 4,280 200 3,000 68,830 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 36,000 13320 12,250 500 4,280 200 3,000 69,550 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 36,600 13,320 12,250 250 4,280 200 3,000 69~00 014122 014122-1100 014122-1900 914122-3100 014122-3300 014122-3900 014122-3931 014122-3956 014122-3960 014122-6028 014122 TOTAL: CITY MANAGER REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 268,650 94,030 8,650 7,450 8,500 3,670 3,150 420 11,000 405,520 287,760 106,470 8,650 7,450 8,500 2,800 3,130 420 11,000 436,180 298,720 106,470 7,850 7,350 8,500 2,800 3;130 420 8,000 443,240 014125 014125-1100 014125-1300 014125-1900 014125-3100 014125-3900 014125-3915 014125-3931 014125-3956 014125-3960 014125-6020 014125-6028 014125-6035 014125-7044 014125 TOTAL: DISASTER pREPAREDNESS REGULAR SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MEETINGS & TRAVEL MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY HAZARD.WASTE REMOVAL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: REIMBURSABLE CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT 116~30 0 40,680 1360 6,050 21,630 5,640 160 700 20,000 1,130 13,730 3,800 231,110 122330 0 45~60 1360 12,550 23,580 5,720 280 790 20,000 1,430 13,730 2,500 249,530 98,500 10,000 40,680 1360 12,550 23,580 5,720 280 790 20,000 1,430 13,730 2,500 231,120 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF 1993-94 ACCOUNT ADOPTED NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 014126 CITY CLERK 014126-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 126,720 014126-1200 OVERTIME 1,500 014126.1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 44350 014126-3100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 2,650 014126-3900 MAINT & OPERATIONS 55,000 014126-3956 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 480 014126-3960 GENERAL LIABILITIES 740 014126-6028 CONTRACT SERV1CES 15,500 014126-7044 CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT 0 014126-7047 CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0 138,290 1,500 51,170 2,650 55,570 630 1,510 92,000 ! ,700 2,000 137,400 500 51,170 2,650 55,570 630 1,510 92,000 1,700 0 014126 TOTAL: 246,940 347,020 343,130 014127 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATION 014127-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 567,780 014127-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 198,720 014127-3300 MILEAGE 3,000 014127-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 120 014127-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 9,060 496,150 183,580 3,000 120 8,800 506,080 183,580 3,000 120 8,800 014127TOTAL: 778,680 691,650 701,580 014150 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 014150-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 159,220 014150-1300 PART-TIME SALARIES 0 014150-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 55,730 014150-3100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 2300 014150-3300 MILEAGE 4,500 014150-3900 MAINT & OPERATIONS 2,000 014150-3956 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 600 014150-3960 GENERAL LIABILITIES 90 148,230 18,460 55,220 2300 3,500 2,000 600 80 112,500 17,000 55,220 800 3,100 500 600 80 014150TOTAL: 224,440 230390 189,800 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F- TIMATFIn FXPFNrMTIIRFR 1993-94 ACCOUNT ADOPTED NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4151 FINANCE 01-4151-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 294,870 01-4151-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 103,200 01-4151-3100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 2,800 01-4151-3300 MILEAGE 3,250 01-4151-3900 MAINT & OPERATIONS 18,850 01-4151-3956 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,100 01-4151-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 560 01-4151-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 30,000 01-4151-7047 C/O: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0 01-4151 TOTAL: 454,630 314,310 116,290 2,800 3,250 20,350 1,100 670 39,540 0 498,310 296,800 116,290 3,300 3,250 20,350 990 670 39,540 1,200 482,390 01-4152 BUSINESS LICENSING 01-4152-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 74,620 01-4152-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 26,120 01-4152-3100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 300 01-4152-3300 MILEAGE 300 01-4152-3900 MAINT & OPERATIONS 6,000 01-4152-3956 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50 01-4152-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 70 01-4152 TOTAL: 107,460 80,790 29,890 700 300 7,000 50 80 118,810 84,060 29,890 700 200 5,000 50 80 119,980 01-4 153 PURCHASING 01-4153-1 I00 REGULAR SALARIES 122,920 01-4153-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 43,020 01-4153-3100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,150 01-4153-3300 MILEAGE 500 01-4153-3900 MAINT & OPERATIONS 9,130 01-4153-3956 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 240 01-4153-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 110 98,370 36,400 1,150 500 9,480 240 110 101,120 36,400 480 100 9,480 240 110 01-4153 TOTAL: 177,070 146250 147,930 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER F TIMATFIn FXPFNI' ITtiRF DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 014154 014154-1100 014154-1900 014154-3100 :01-4154-3900 014154-3956 014154-3960 014154-6028 RISK MANAGEMENT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 37,150 13,000 1,300 7,800 650 220 12,000 41,020 15,180 1,300 8,800 650 240 13,000 42,920 15,180 500 !,000 320 240 12,000 014154 TOTAL: 72,120 80,190 72,160 014155 01-4155-1100 014155-1900 014155-3100 01-4155-3900 014155-3956 014155-3960 014155-6028 TREASURY MANAGEMENT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT. & OPER. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 600 210 1,100 200 400 20 0 600 220 1,100 200 400 20 500 600 220 1,000 100 380 20 450 014155 TOTAL: 2,530 3,040 2,770 014156 014156-1100 014156-1900 014156-1901 014156-3100 014156-3300 014156-3900 014156-3956 014156-3960 014156-6028 014156 TOTAL: PERSONNEL REGULAR SALARY FRINGE BENEFITS NEW POS CONTINGENCY TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 100,190 35,070 5,000 2,300 200 25,800 250 380 9,000 178,190 104,180 38,550 5,000 2,000 200 18,300 250 340 13,000 181,820 107,980 38,550 5,000 2,000 i00 18,300 25O 340 13,000 185,520 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER F~TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF-c; DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 01..4157 014157-1100 01..4157-1200 01..4157-1900 01..4157-3900 01..4157-3960 01..4157-6028 FIRE DISTRICT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 82,650 4,140 28,930 0 0 0 89,870 8,500 33,250 570 190 18,540 101,700 9,760 33,250 570 190 18,540 01..4157 TOTAL: 115,720 150,920 164,010 01..4159 01..4159-1100 }14159-1900 01..4159-3100 01..4159-3900 01..4159-3960 01..4159-6028 RES. SRVCS - ADMINISTRATION REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFIT TRAVEL &MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 126,570 44300 500 14,850 1,560 140340 135~50 50,080 1,000 56,150 2,090 151,640 138,060 50,080 1,000 56,150 2,090 151,640 01..4159 TOTAL: 328,120 396,310 399,020 01..4160 01..4160-1100 014160-1900 .014160-3100 ,01-4160-3900 01..4160-3956 01..4160-3960 01..4160-6028 01..4160 TOTAL: RES. SRVCS - GEO INFO SYSTEM REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 87,910 30,770 800 7,600 270 230 14,000 141,580 92,550 34,240 1,000 7,600 250 120 3,500 139,260 96,050 34,240 1,000 4,970 230 120 15~20 151,830 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER ,014161 014161-1100 014161-1900 014161-3100 014161-3900 .014161-3956 014161-3960 0141614028 F TIMATFI' FXPFNI",ITIIRF DESCRIPTION RES. SRVCS - MGMT INFO SYSTEM REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 203,160 71,110 1,450 16,500 670 210 2,500 1 994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 205,750 76,130 ! ,450 23,000 670 280 2,500 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 209,870 76,130 3,000 21,550 670 280 2,500 014161 TOTAL: 295,600 309,780 314,000 014162 014162-3900 014162-3960 0141624028 014162"8019 014162'8020 014162'8021 014162'8022 014162 TOTAL: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES ,000 900 78,300 0 1,000 3,000 4,500 90,700 2,200 900 79,300 500 1,000 2,500 4,500 90,900 500 900 66,300 400 500 2,400 4,500 75,500 014245 014245-1100 014245-1200 014245-1300 014245.1900 014245-3900 014245-3931 014245-3956 014245-3960 014245-6028 014245'8019 014245-8020 014245-8021 .014245-8022 014245-7044 CITY FACILITIES REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT. & OPERATIONS DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT 119,530 5~00 0 41,840 533,550 2,800 520 12,110 405,900 0 13,750 7,160 246,900 0 125,780 5,000 0 46,540 257,650 2,800 520 13,660 496,910 185~00 22,000 23,000 378,000 0 142,000 1,500 1,100 46,540 263,570 2~00 52O 13,660 506,240 185,000 25,000 23,000 378,000 3,400 014245 TOTAL: 1.389,060 1,556,860 1,592330 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 014265 014265-1901 014265-2100 014265-2400 014265-3965 014265-3975 014265 TOTAL: F TIMATFI' FXPFNnlT!IRF. DESCRIPTION PERSONNEL OVERHEAD RESERVE CONTINGENCY COFFEE CONTRIBUTION EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE SAFETY FOOTWEAR 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 0 1,200 2,000 132,000 14,700 149,900 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 100,000 1,200 20,000 132,000 15,000 268,200 1994~5 AMENDED BUDGET 0 1,200 15,000 32,000 15,000 63,200 014285 014285-3100 014285-3900 014285-3956 014285-3958 014285-3959 014285-3961 014285-3973 014285-3974 .014285.6028 014285-7047 014285 TOTAL: GENERAL OVERHEAD TRAVEL & MEETING MAINT. & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS AUTOMOBILE INSUR FIRE INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY BOOKING FEES/SB2557 PROP.TAX ADMIN/SB2557 CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 10,930 6,500 27300 75,000 25,000 700,000 228,000 48,000 582,000 0 1,702,730 !1,000 25400 27,700 25,000 25,000 800,000 228,000 48,000 609,900 5,000 1,804,600 9,500 6,700 27,050 25,000 36,000 750,000 715,000 35,000 594,300 0 2,198,550 014313 014313-1100 014313-1900 014313-3100 014313-3300 014313-3900 014313-3956 014313-3960 014313-6028 014313 TOTAL: COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 142,230 49,780 1,750 3,000 5,950 1,100 120 0 203,930 134,890 49,910 1,250 3,000 5,950 1,100 !10 0 196,210 137,600 49,910 1,800 2,000 2,450 1,100 110 3,000 197,970 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4333 01-4333-1100 01-4333-1900 01-4333-3100 01-4333-3300 01-4333-3900 01-4333-393 I 01-4333-3956 01-4333-3960 01-4333-6028 01-4333-6035 01-4333 TOTAL: F TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF- DESCRIPTION PLANNING REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT SERVICES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 819,950 794340 787,600 286,980 293,910 293,910 2,280 2,280 1,880 3,000 3,000 3,000 18,750 20,250 20,850 6,440 3,960 3,960 1,280 1,410 1,410 1,220 1,180 1,180 77,610 77,210 76,010 13,000 10,000 3,000 1,230,510 1,207,540 1,192,800 01-4353 01-4353-1 I00 01-4353-3100 01-4353-3900 01-4353-3960 01-4353-6028 01-4353 TOTAL: PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SALARIES TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 6,040 6,040 6,040 750 750 750 250 250 250 I0 10 310 0 0 30,000 7,050 7,050 37350 01-4373 01-4373-1100 '01-4373-1200 ,01-4373-1900 01-4373-3100 01-4373-3300 01-4373-3900 01-4373-3931 01-4373-3956 01-4373-3960 01-4373-6028 .01-4373-6035 BUILDING& SAFETY REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTION GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICESFREIMBURSEABLE 879,480 915,290 937350 0 0 1,000 307,820 338,660 338,660 1,250 1,250 1,250 3,000 3,000 3,000 16,100 16,600 21,900 40,120 30,290 30,290 700 750 750 990 1,000 1,000 38300 38300 69,700 0 10,000 20,000 0 ! -4373 TOTA L: 1,287,760 1355,140 1,424,900 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4451 01.4451-1100 01.4451-1300 01.4451-1900 01.4451-3100 01-4451-3110 01.4451-3900 01.4451-3910 01.4451-3931 01.4451-3935 0 i .4451-3956 01.4451-6028 01-4451-6030 01-4451-7044 01-4451-7045 01.4451-7047 01-4451 TOTAL: FSTIMATFD FXPFNrMT!IRFR DESCRIPTION POLICE DEPT REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS TRAVEL & MEETINGS \ D.A.R.E. MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPS \ D.A.R.E. PROGRAM VEHICLE &EQUIP MAINT VEHICLE & EQUIP MAINT~D.A.R.E. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES \ D.A.R.E. CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 84,440 109,770 29,550 5,000 3,200 59,410 23,240 264,860 2,990 5,060 7,922,520 73,270 0 0 0 8,583310 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 53,220 109,770 19,690 5,000 6,400 59,410 35,300 264,860 5,980 5,060 8,475,320 148,200 1,270 20,000 4,870 9,214350 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 31,700 90,000 19,690 4,750 5,980 57,650 34,590 264,860 5,750 4,850 8,474,470 148,200 1,200 18,900 4,700 9,167,290 01'4532 01'4532-1100 01'4532-1300 01.4532-1300 01-4532-1900 01'4532-1900 01'4532-3100 01'4532-3300 01'4532-3900 01.4532-3915 01'4532-3931 01-.4532-3956 01'4532-3960 01'4532-6028 01'4532-7044 01'4532 TOTAL: COMMUNITY SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES REG PART-TIME SAL FRINGE BEN - REG SAL FRINGE BEN - P/T SAL TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT 519,120 106,170 14350 181,690 4,990 3,200 3,800 187,410 7,700 2,810 2,400 33,440 500 1,068,880 525,970 112390 14,930 194,610 6,280 3,200 3,800 163330 26340 2,850 1300 2,090 8,440 0 1,065,530 540,170 112,390 14,930 194,610 6,280 3,200 3,800 168330 14,200 2,850 1370 2,090 28,110 1,800 1,094,130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 014540 014540-3100 014540-3900 014540-3956 014540-3960 F.c;TiMATFrl FXPFNnlT!IRFs; DESCRIPTION PARK/REC. COMMISSION TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY t 993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 750 750 750 350 350 350 450 450 450 20 20 20 014540 TOTAL: 1,570 1,570 1,570 014637 014637-1100 014637-1200 014637-1300 014637-1900 014637-3100 014637-3300 014637-3900 014637-3931 014637-3956 014637-3960 014637-6028 ENGINEERING ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 140,450 150,890 142,800 0 0 310 0 0 I0,000 49,160 55,830 55,830 2,350 2,350 2,350 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,800 15,850 15,850 7,280 6,230 6,230 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,060 1,010 1,010 72,930 523,000 2,200 014637 TOTAL: 293,050 759,180 240,600 014638 014638-1100 014638-1900 014638-3100 014638-3900 014638-3956 014638-3960 014638-6028 ENG-DEVELOPMENT MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 445,110 465,900 479,290 155,790 172,380 172,380 370 370 370 4,500 4,050 4,050 180 180 180 1260 1220 1220 121,000 117,000 32,000 014638 TOTAL: 728210 761,100 689,490 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FsTIMATFn FXPFNnlT!IRFS ACCOUNT NUMBER 01..4639 014639-1100 014639-1900 01..4639-3100 014639-3900 01..4639-393 I 01..4639-3932 01..4639-3956 01-4639-3960 01..4639-6028 01..4639 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION ENG-TRAFFIC MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHILE MAINT & OPER EQUIPMENT MAINT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 140,740 49,260 850 1,250 2,790 500 370 140 8,000 203,900 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 144,010 53,280 850 1,250 4,040 500 370 150 8,000 212,450 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 146,900 53,280 850 1,250 4,040 500 370 110 4,000 211,300 01..4640 01-4640-1100 01-4640.1900 01-4640-3100 01..4640-3900 01..4640-3956 .01..4640-3960 01..4640-9400 01-4640 TOTAL: ENG-PROJECT MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTINGENCY: Pavement Rehabilitaion Projects 92,830 32,490 400 3,000 510 40 0 129,270 94,420 34,940 400 3,000 510 40 757,150 890,460 97,780 34,940 400 3,000 510 40 757,150 893,820 01..4641 014641-1100 014641-1200 014641-1900 014641-3100 01..4641-3900 01..4641-3931 01..4641-3956 01..4641-3960 01 ..464 ! -6028 01-4641 TOTAL: ENG-CONSTRUCTN MGMT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 223,560 200 78,250 730 3,000 28,530 150 370 5,000 339,790 222,460 200 82,310 730 3,000 24,140 150 330 5,000 338,320 227,000 2,000 82,310 730 3,000 24,140 150 330 5,000 344,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER FS;TIMATFn FXPFNnlT!!RF DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 014645 .014645.1100 014645-1200 014645-1900 014645.3900 014645.6028 014645-7044 01-4645-7045 014645 TOTAL: ENG.: NPDES PROGRAM (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES 87,250 5,000 32,280 40,000 189,900 47,500 137,500 539,430 01-4646 01-4646-1100 014646-1200 014646-1900 014646-3100 014646-3900 014646-3930 014646-3931 014646-3960 01-4646.6027 0146466028 01-4646-7043 014646-7044 014646-7047 COMMUNITY DEV. - MAINT.VEHICLES & EQUIP. REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT. & OPERATIONS FUEL VEHICLE/EQUIP MAINT. GENERAL LIABILITY HAZARDOUS WASTE RMVL CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP-FACILITIES CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXP - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 157,210 0 55,020 0 60,000 230,000 156,140 4,660 20,000 0 0 6,700 0 161,620 6,000 59,800 800 65,000 100,000 150,000 3,190 0 3,200 11,000 0 2,770 168,100 6,000 59,800 800 65,000 100,000 150,000 3,190 0 3,200 11,000 0 2,590 014646 TOTAL: 689,730 563,380 569,680 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRFR ACCOUNT NUMBER 014647 014647-1100 014647-1200 014647-1300 014647-1900 014647-3100 014647-3900 014647-3931 014647-3932 01-4647-3933 014647-3956 014647-3960 014647-6027 014647-6028 014647-7043 014647-7044 014647-7045 014647-7047 014647-7048 0 i 4647-802 ! 014647-8022 014647-9217 014647-9332 014647-9333 014647-9334 014647-9335 014647-9336 014647 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION COMMUNITY DEV. - MAINT. PUBLIC WORKS REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EQUIPMENT MAINT EMERG & REG VEH RNTL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILTY HAZARDOUS WASTE RMVL CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP-FACILITY CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES CAPITAL EXP - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXP - PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CONTROLLER CABINET RETROFIT/Nail Elec. Code IRRIG.1MPROV.TO CENTRAL CONTROL: PARKS HAVEN MEDIAN IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENT RED HILL NURSERY ACCES ROAD CONSTRUCTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 673,020 70,000 11,490 235,560 1300 557300 320,970 11,100 15,000 1,450 16,520 10,000 618,580 29,000 19320 87,130 0 0 81,010 34,810 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,793,560 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 699,850 70,000 11,490 258,940 1,300 560,060 264,720 13,500 22,000 2,850 16,380 17,000 655,410 0 0 56,930 0 0 85,050 16,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,751,980 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 713,900 70,000 11,490 258,940 1300 559,170 264,720 13,500 22,000 2,850 16,380 17,000 687,730 2,820 7,230 61,680 1,670 17,000 85,000 16,500 10,000 10,000 3,800 4,600 7,300 6,000 2,872,580 014650 014650-1100 014650-1900 0 i 4650-3100 014650-3300 014650-3900 014650-3956 014650-3960 014650-5900 014650-6028 014650 TOTAL: INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES GENERAL LIABILTY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES 213,560 74,750 820 600 122,200 0 1,990 75,000 510 489,430 233,430 86370 820 600 155,700 100 2330 75,000 510 554,860 237,860 86370 820 600 155,700 100 2,330 75,000 510 559,290 014991 01-3992-8000 014991-9000 014991 TOTAL: TRANSFERS TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER OUT (475,000~ 475,000 0 0 129,500 129,500 0 442,730 442,730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER FRTIMATFn FXPFNnlTt!RFR DESCRIPTION SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST CENTER, BY ACCOUNT 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 02-4532 02-4532-1100 .02-4532-1200 02-4532-1300 02-4532-1900 02-4532-3100 02-4532-3300 02-4532-3900 02-4532-3912 02-4532-3956 02-4532-3960 02-4532-6028 02-4532-6032 02-4532-8019 02-4532-8020 02-4532-802 ! 02-4532-8022 02-4532 TOTAL: LIBRARY: PROGRAM SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MILEAGE MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS: Maint. Dept. DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: Maint. Dept. TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311,790 1,000 116,870 117,700 3,200 3,250 97,500 9,260 4,000 4,330 143,250 76,920 16,800 2,240 3,300 73,390 984,800 299,700 100 136,870 117,700 2,700 3,350 88,120 9~60 2,660 4,330 107,000 76,920 9,200 0 3,300 50~00 911,210 03-4451 03-4451'3900 03'4451 TOTAL: REIMB/STATE & COUNTY RE: PARKING CITATIONS PARKING CITATIONS SURCHRG 13,100 13,100 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER F.qTiMATI=I1 FXPFNnlTIIRF-q DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 05-4150 05-4150-1100 05-4150-1200 05-4150-1300 05-4150-1900 05-4 150-31 O0 05-4150-3300 05-4150-3911 05-4 150-3912 05-4150-3913 05-4 150-3931 05-4150-3933 05-4150-3956 05-4150-3960 05-4150-6027 05-4150-6031 05-4150-6032 05-4 ! 50-6033 05-4150-8019 05-4150-8020 05-4150-8021 05-4150-8022 05-4150-7043 05-4150-7044 SPORTS COMPLEX REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT. & OpERATIONS/Recreation Programs MAINT. & OPERATIONS/Stadium Maint. MAINT. & OPERATIONS/Complex Maint. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/DEPRECIATION EMERG & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL DUES GENERAL LIABILITY HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL CONTRACT SERVICES/Recreation Programs CONTRACT SERVICES/Stadium Maint. CONTRACT SERVICES/Complex Maint. TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT 339,790 263,880 269,200 0 30,500 61,000 64,600 129,450 129,450 122,810 103,790 103,790 1,050 900 900 330 330 330 49,670 63,360 87,310 16,200 10,600 30,600 62,790 5,000 45,070 0 3,000 3,000 0 6,000 6,000 0 160 160 8,110 5300 5300 1,500 0 0 84300 116,030 12 ! ,030 111,850 98300 128,300 0 0 0 0 7,850 7,850 11,250 7,500 7,500 206,080 62,000 62,000 266,250 148,720 174,860 0 0 0 3,500 2,000 2,000 05-4150 TOTAL: 1,350,080 1,064,670 1,245,650 06-4637 06-4637-1100 0641637-1200 06-4637-1900 06-4637 TOTAL: CCWD REIMBURSEMENT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS 68,900 75,260 76,800 0 0 0 24,120 27,850 27,850 93,020 103,110 104,650 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 07-4647 07-4647-1100 07-4647-1900 07-4647-6028 F, ITIMATFI"} FXPFNrqTIIRF. I DESCRIPTION CALTRANS REIMB./MNT. REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS CONTRACT SERVICES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 25,640 8,970 25,000 '1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 11,340 4,200 0 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 11,560 4,200 0 07-4647 TOTAL: 59,610 15,540 15,760 08-4647 08-4647-1100 08-4647-1300 08-4647-1900 08-4647-6028 S.B.CNTY REIMB/MNT. REGULAR SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS CONTRACT SERVICES 2,670 0 930 80,000 2jO0 15,690 1,160 83,000 2,470 15,690 1,160 83,000 08-4647 TOTAL: 83,600 102,150 102,320 09-4637 09-4637-1100 09-4637-1200 09-4637-1300 09-4637-1900 09-4637-3931 09-4637-6028 09-4637-7044 09-4637-7045 09-4637-8022 09-4637-8780 09-.4637-9209 09-4637-9210 09-4637-9211 09-4637-9212 09-4637-9301 09-4637-9302 09-4637-9303 09-4637-9304 09-4637-9305 09-4637-9330 09-4637 TOTAL: GASTAX2106, 2107&2107.5 REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP-EQUIPMNT CAPITAL EXP-VEHICLE ELECTRIC UTILITIES TRANS STUDIES& FAC i HIGHLAND ~ LOCUST ROCHESTER ~ SF R/R IMPRV ARCHIBALD ~ BASELINE BASELINE ~ CARNELIAN LARK DR W.OF ROCHESTER N/E CORNER BASELINENPL VICTORIA W.OF PECAN 9TH ST ~ HELLMAN SIGNAL: FOOTHILL ~ BAKER SIG: MILLIKEN (ARROW/FOOTHILL) 660,550 0 0 231,190 40,440 261,000 0 75,900 719,100 0 75,000 120,000 126,000 80,000 60,000 22,500 6,000 74,000 60,000 0 2,611,680 654320 0 0 242,100 41,190 69,000 0 75,900 320~00 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 0 2,000 6,000 2,000 0 0 1,416,510 670,470 1,000 2,600 242,100 41,190 69,000 24,500 75,900 300,000 7,310 63,750 0 2,500 82,000 0 0 6,000 70,000 0 700 1,659,020 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 104637 104637-1100 104637-1900 104637-6028 104637-7042 10-4637-8909 104637-9110 104637-9113 104637-9210 104637-9306 104637-9307 104637-9308 104637-9309 104637-9315 104637 TOTAL: F TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF DESCRIPTION PROPOSITION 111 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS CONTRACT SERVICES C/O: LAND ACQUISITION BANYAN: EASTWOOD TO HELLMAN PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM LOCAL STREET REHAB. (VAR.) ROCHESTER ~ SFRR IMPROV. BASELINE: DAY CK TO VPL SAPPHIRE: BANYAN TO MOON 4TH ST WEST OF HAVEN SAPPHIRE: MOON TO HILLSIDE ROCHESTER (RC High School Mitigation Prod 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 114,320 134,870 138300 40,010 49,900 49,900 0 204,000 204,000 0 0 2,000 90,000 0 0 2,000 2,000 14370 700,000 700,000 897,000 0 110,000 80,000 270,000 0 260 53,000 2,000 0 30,000 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 25,060 1,464,330 1,202,770 1,410,890 124637 124637-1100 124637-1900 124637-8828 124637-8833 124637-8913 124637-9202 124637-9203 124637-9204 124637-9305 124637-9310 124637-9326 124637-9401 TDA ARTICLE 8 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS SIG.19TH & HERMOSA SIG.FOOTHILL ~ RAMONA SIG. ~ ARCHIBALD & S.B. SIGNAL MILLIKEN ~ FAIRMNT SIGNAL BASELINE ~ EAST AVE SIGNAL HAVEN ~ BANYAN SIGNAL: FOOTHILL ~ BAKER SIGNAL CHURCH ~ TElIRA VISTA PRY METROLINK STATION& FACILITIES SIGNAL: ARROW ~ WHlTE OAK 86,690 80,590 82300 30340 29,820 29,820 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 180,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 187,500 186,000 0 2,000 0 204,870 0 60,000 60,000 91,550 0 92,960 0 0 326,000 0 140,000 140,000 124637 TOTAL: 670,080 676,410 1,115,950 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 134563 134563-1100 134563-1300 134563-1900 134563-3300 134563-3900 134563-3960 134563-5900 134563-6028 134563-7043 134563-7044 134563 TOTAL: F TIMATFI' FXPFNInlTilRF DESCRIPTION COMMSRVCS-RECREATN REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN./GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES C/O: BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS C/O: EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE/FIXTURES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 11,860 183,050 10,390 400 138,790 4,490 100,840 208,950 2,000 2,200 662,970 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 30,220 224,780 19,240 400 124,000 4,710 112,220 234,470 2,000 42,000 794,040 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 30,830 224,780 19,240 400 124,000 4,710 112,220 234,470 2,000 42,000 794,650 14-4158 144158-1100 14-4158-1900 14-4158-3100 14-4158-3900 144158-3956 14-4158-3960 14-4158-6028 14-4158-7044 14-4158 TOTAL: AIR QUALITY IMPRMNT GRANT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS DUES GENERAL LLABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES C/O: EQUIPMENT 11,360 3,980 200 57,000 280 1,170 60,004) 0 133,990 I 1,360 4,200 200 57,000 280 950 38,000 45,000 156,990 11,590 4,200 200 57,000 280 950 38,000 45,000 157,220 16-4637 16-4637-1100 16-4637-1900 16-4637-9106 ! 6-4637-9311 16-4637-9402 16-4637 TOTAL: PED.GRANT/ART.3 REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS WHEELCHAIR RAMPS (VAR. LOCA) MONTE VISTA: ARCHIBALD/AMETHYST BERYL ST IMPV(BASELINE / 19TH) 1,250 440 12,000 73,240 0 86,930 0 0 4,000 0 51,000 55,000 0 0 4,000 0 0 4,000 18-4637 184637-1100 18-4637-1900 18-4637 TOTAL: FETSIM GRANT REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS 10,260 3,590 13,850 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 194637 194637-5900 194637-8766 194637-9120 F- TIMATFr'} FXPFNr'}ITIIRF, DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE FAC: ETIWANDA ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD MSTR DRAINAGE PLAN DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 3,390 1,000 11,300 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 0 1,500 0 0 0 5,000 194637 TOTAL: 15,690 0 6,500 204532 204532'1100 204532-1900 204532'3960 204532"6028 204532'8770 ~04532-8927 204532-9103 204532-9312 204532 TOTAL: PARK DEVELOPMENT REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CREEKSIDE PARK N/E COMM PRK DB RETR CHAFFEY COLLEGE FIELD MNT OLD TOWN PARK TOUCH PAD INSTAL 33,650 11,780 80 7,750 0 408,070 25,000 16,500 502,830 0 0 70 6,550 0 409,710 25,000 0 441330 0 0 70 20,290 13,740 409,710 25,000 0 468,810 214647 214647-1100 214647-1900 214647-3100 214647-5900 214647-6028 214647-8135 214647-8822 214647-8871 214647-9403 214647-9404 BEAUTIFICATION FUND REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES ARCHIBALD PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION ETIWANDA COBBLESTONE CTYWIDE BEAUT/NEXUS 19th SLPkwy. Beaut.(W.City LimitSCarnelian) 19th St. Pkwy. lkauL(HermosafHaven) 6,580 2,300 0 25,670 0 0 50,000 2,000 0 0 107390 39,730 1,500 25,670 2,000 162,500 0 0 12,000 15,000 109,600 39,730 1,000 25,670 2,500 15,000 0 0 12,000 0 214647 TOTAL: 86,550 365,790 205,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 224637 224637-1100 224637-1900 224637-3900 224637-5900 224637-7044 224637-8738 224637-8753 224637-8855 224637-8856 224637-9120 224637-9205 224637-9206 224637-9211 224637-9306 224637-9308 224637-9311 224637-9313 224637-9402 224637 TOTAL: F- TIMATFD FXPFNDITIIRF- DESCRIPTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT & OPERATIONS ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD C/O: EQUIPMENT ARROW BRIDGE WIDEN CHURCH IMPRV ARCHBLD/HAVEN WILSON IMP-AMETHYST ARCH IMP/S/O BANY DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS ROCHESTER-HGHLND TO BANYAN BANYAN-MT.BALDY PL-RCHSTR BASELINE ~ ARCHIBALD INTRSCTN BASELINE(DAY CREEK/VICTORIA PRK LN) 4TH ST.(WEST CITY LIMITS/HAVEN AVE.) MONTE VISTA: ARCHIBALD/AMETHYST CARNELIAN: BASELINE TO 19TH BERYL (BASELINE TO 19TH) 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 130,180 45,560 0 74,980 9,000 5,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 539,000 201,000 0 0 0 24,410 116,000 0 1,147,130 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 145,310 53,760 1,910 86,700 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 350,000 280,000 0 5,000 17,000 1,041,680 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 149,490 53,760 2,400 181,800 0 0 5,680 0 0 143,000 67,620 26,710 165,000 350,000 280,000 9,530 116,000 0 1,550,990 234637 234637-11 O0 234637-1900 234637-5900 234637-8785 23.-4637-8859 :234637-8863 234637-8948 234637-9120 234637 TOTAL: GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CUCAM.DAY,DR CRH AREA II CARNELIAN AREA Vi LEMON S.D. AREA IV S.D.4TH S6 DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS 35,700 12,500 0 4,000 0 8,000 1,000 20,500 81,700 12,030 4,450 18,000 1,000 0 2,000 0 30,000 67,480 12,270 4,450 9,000 1,000 10,590 3,100 130 60,000 100,540 24-4637 24-4637-1 i 00 24-4637-1900 24-4637-8914 244637-9112 24-4637-9313 244637-9314 24-4637-XXXX 244637 TOTAL; F.A.U. / ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS ARCHIBALD ~ 8TH STREET TRAFFIC SIG. HAVEN REHAB. CC TO FOOTHILL CARNELIAN: BASELINE TO 19TH CARNELIAN: S.B. ROAD TO BASELINE SIGNAL: BASELINE ~ EAST AVENUE 20,660 7,230 0 0 2 ,O54,OOO i,638,000 0 3,719,890 60,860 22,520 0 0 0 2,170,000 0 2,253,380 62,100 22,520 126,000 41,42o 0 0 186,000 438,040 "7! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 26-4532 26--4532.8768 26-4532 TOTAL: FS;TIMATFn FXPFNr'}ITilRF DESCRIPTION ROBERTI Z'BERG GRANT FUND MISC. PARK IMPROVEMENTS 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 29,090 29,090 '1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 29,090 29,090 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 27-4532 27-4532-1100 27-4532-1900 27-4532--8924 27-4532 TOTAL: 1988 CONSERVATION GRANT REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS N/E COMMUNITY PARK DESIGN/DEVEL. 4,740 1,660 269,600 276,000 0 0 269,600 269,600 0 0 55,200 55,200 ,8-4333 28-4333-8185 28-4333-8189 28-4333-9025 28-4333-9042 28-4333-9044 28-4333-9045 28--4333-9105 28-4333-9106 28-4333-9107 28-4333-9115 28-4333-9315 28-4333-9316 28-4333-9318 C.D.B.G FUND PERSONNEL GENERAL ADMIN: SALARIES & F.B. HOME IMPRV: SALARIES & F.B. S.W.CUCAMONGA ST: SALARIES & F.B. VINMAR DESIGN CALAVERAS DESIGN GRAFFITI REMOVAL: SALARIES & F.B. NEIGHBORHOOD CTR: SALARIES & F.B. WHEELCHAIR RAMP: SALARIES & F.B. SIDEWALK GRINDING: SALARIES & F.B. CALAVERAS(9TH TO ARROW): SALARIES LION'S CTR.: SALARIES & F.B. 9TH ST.DESIGN: SALARIES & F.B. SALINA / VINMAR: SALARIES & F.B. 110,230 70310 12,850 700 700 11,610 9,610 13,840 13,840 0 12,580 21,630 0 113,430 71,510 0 0 0 15,520 16,110 12,650 12,650 25,800 12,920 12,270 21,970 115,090 72,550 0 0 0 15,750 16350 12,830 12,830 26,180 13,110 12,450 22,290 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 284333 284333.8 185 284333-8187 284333-8189 284333-8955 284333-9025 284333-9042 284333-9044 284333.9045 284333-9105 28-4333-9106 284333-9107 284333-9114 28-4333-9115 284333-9116 284333-9121 284333-9124 284333-9213 284333-9214 284333-9215 284333-9315 284333-9316 284333-9317 284333-9318 284333-9413 284333-3905 284333 TOTAL: Fs;TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF DESCRIPTION C.D.B.G FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION FAIR HOUSING HOUSING REHAB. HIST.PRESERV.REHAB. S/W CUCAMONGA STS. VINMAR DESIGN CALAVERAS DESIGN GRAFFITTI REMOVAL NEIGHBORHOOD CTR IMPROV WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS SIDEWALK GRINDING LANDLORD TENANT MEDIATION CALAVERAS AVE.(AROW TO 9TH) CHAFFEY GARCIA REHAB. VINMAR/S MADRE WATERLINE SIERRA MADRE / CONSTRUCTION HOMELESS OUTREACH HOUSE OF RUTH OLD TIMERS FOUNDATIION WEST LION'S CENTER (ADA Improvements) 9TH STREET DESIGN S.O.V.A. SALINA / VINMAR CONST. Y.W.C.A. CONTINGENCY 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 7,140 9,060 151,510 3,010 215,900 300 300 18390 82,840 5,000 12,000 8330 0 1,820 31,170 13,470 10,000 6,540 8,000 138,450 4370 4,680 180,000 0 29,440 1,219,620 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 8,740 I 1300 170,670 0 0 0 0 14,480 46,750 6,190 22,230 8,570 184,200 0 0 0 8,000 7,600 8,000 194,750 730 7,000 157,970 7,000 0 1,179,010 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 8,740 11,300 170,670 0 0 0 0 14,480 46,750 6,190 22,230 8,570 184,200 0 0 0 8,000 7,600 8,000 100,000 730 7,000 157,970 7,000 0 1,088,860 324637 32-4637-1100 324637-1200 324637-1900 324637-9027 324637-9031 324637-9109 324637-9112 324637-9113 324637-9313 324637-9314 324637-9328 324637TOTAL: MEASURE i REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS HAVEN ST IMPROV PHI 19TH (CARNELIAN & AMETHYST) TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE INV HAVEN REHAB(4TH N FTHL) LOCAL STREET REHAB CARNELIAN: BASELINE TO 19TH CARNELIAN: S.B.ROAD TO BASELINE MILLIKEN AVE (ARROW TO FOOTHILL) 178380 0 62,430 3,710,000 36,000 17,000 0 0 150,000 212,000 0 4365,810 129,260 0 47,830 3,500,000 2,000 15,000 0 0 0 312,000 0 4,006,090 133,270 430 47,830 3,513,890 156310 32,000 16,070 140,000 0 389,180 1394,110 5,823,090 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FsTIMATFI' FXPFNnlT! IRFS ACCOUNT NUMBER 334131 334131-1100 334131-1900 334131-3100 334131-3300 334131-3900 334131-3960 334131-5900 3341314028 334131-7047 334131 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 177,290 62,050 500 300 59,240 1,680 65,590 41,920 0 408,570 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 192,390 71,180 800 300 56,900 1,630 65,850 39,500 0 428,550 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 197,240 71,180 800 300 54,950 1,630 65,850 37,870 6380 436,200 34-4532 34-4532-1100 34-4532-1900 344532-8924 344532 TOTAL: PUBLIC RESOURCES GRANT REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS N/E COMM.PARK DESIGN/DEVLPMNT 4,740 1,660 239,850 246,250 0 0 239,850 239,850 0 0 49,250 49,250 354637 354637-9027 354637-9031 354637-9205 354637'9306 35-4637'9308 35-4637'9328 354637 TOTAL: SB 140 FUND HAVEN: FOOTHILL TO BASELINE 19TH(CARNLIAN/AMTHY) ROCHESTER (HIGHLAND/BANYAN) BASELINE: DAY CREEK TO VPL 4TH ST.(WEST CITY LIMITS TO HAVEN) MILLIKEN (ARROW TO FOOTHILL) 520,000 0 0 35,000 0 0 555,000 520,000 0 0 50,000 55,000 0 625,000 520,000 10,960 27,780 50,000 40,000 225,000 873,740 364637 36-4637-1100 36-.4637-1900 36-4637-9326 36-4637 TOTAL: STATE PROP 108: Passenger Rail & Clean Air Bond Act of 1990 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS METROLINK STATION & FACILITIES 0 0 0 61,470 22,740 600,000 684,210 62,800 22,740 1,266,370 1351,910 74 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F- TIMATFn FXPFNnlT!IRF- ACCOUNT NUMBER 37.4637 37.4637-9326 37.4637 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION S.Cnty. MEASURE I: COMMUTER RAIL METROLINK STATION & FACILITIES '1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 0 1,455,700 0 1,455,700 40.4130 LMD #1 GENERAL 40.4130-1100 40.4130-1900 40.4130-1001 40-4130-3300 40.4130-3900 40.4130-3931 40.4130-3933 40.4130-3960 40.4130-5900 40.4130-6028 40.4130-6029 40.4130-7043 40.4130-7044 40.4130-7045 40.4 130-7047 40.4 130-7048 40.4130-8021 40.4130-8022 40.4130-9217 40.4130-9320 40.4130-9332 40.4130-9333 40.4130-9334 40.4130-9335 40.4130-9405 40.4 130-9406 40.4130-9407 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT 'TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: pLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDy/Implementation CONTROLLER CABINET(Retro~t/Nat'l Elec. Code) IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parks HAVEN MEDIAN IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENT ADA TOT LOT RETROFIT: Bear Gulch Park IRRIGATION CONTROLLER IMPROVEMENTS IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parkw 40.4130 TOTAL: 44,960 15,740 51,100 1,000 16,830 16310 1,000 7,480 62,560 361,410 6,000 36,000 4,980 0 0 0 182,1 I0 49,570 0 9,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 866,750 49,510 18320 51,880 0 40,940 16310 1,000 8,240 67340 451,150 12,000 8,000 0 3,850 0 8,000 141,750 42,000 12,000 0 13,000 16,250 1,430 8,000 30,000 600 79,420 1,080,990 51,800 18320 51,880 0 45,010 16310 1,000 8,240 67.340 451,150 12,000 56,400 0 8,650 1,550 8,000 135,000 42,000 12,000 0 13,000 16,250 1,430 8,000 30,000 600 79,420 1,135350 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 41..4130 41..4130-1100 414130-1200 41-4130.1300 41..4130-1900 41..4130-1001 41..4130-3300 41..4130-3900 41..4130-3931 41..4130-3933 41 .-4130.3960 41..4130-5900 41..4130-6028 41..4130-6029 41..4130-7043 41..4130-7044 41..4130-7045 .41-4130-7047 11-4 i 30-7048 41..4130-8021 41..4130-8022 41..4130-9217 41..4130-9320 41..4130-9321 41..4130-9332 41..4130-9333 41..4130-9335 41-4130-9405 41..4130-9407 41..4130-9408 41..4130 TOTAL: F TIMATFn FXPFNnlT!IRF.q DESCRIPTION LMD #2 VICTORIA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & DEPRECIATION EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation RECONST. ETIWANDA TRAIL/DRAINAGE CONTROLLER CABINET(Retrofit/Nat'l Elec. Code) IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parks PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENT ADA RETROFIT: Windrows, Kenyon, Groves & Vintage Park IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parkw WOOD EXERCISE STATION REPLACEMENT '1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 264,060 0 4,650 92,420 20,680 340 41,300 10,000 1,000 12330 1 ! 5 ,530 568,810 0 156,790 27,550 0 0 0 455,700 20,000 0 29,680 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,910,840 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 355,830 5,000 4,650 131,660 21,340 0 65,720 10,000 1,000 11360 122,070 539200 10,000 0 2300 22,950 0 8,000 346,500 20,000 20,000 0 0 11,600 4,800 1,500 140,000 286,000 5,000 2,146,480 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 369,190 5,000 4,650 131,660 21340 0 73,130 10,000 1,000 11360 122,070 594,900 10,000 40,360 2300 26,700 1,550 8,000 331,510 20,000 20,000 0 108300 11,600 4,800 1,500 140,000 304,500 5,000 2380,420 42''4130 42-4130-1100 42-4130.1900 .42-4130-1001 42-4130-3900 42''4130-3960 42''4130-5900 42''4130-6028 42''4130-8021 42..4 130-8022 42..4 130-9217 42''4130-9322 42''4130-9332 LMD #3A PRKWY SO OF 6TH ST. EAST OF 1-15 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MOISTURE SENSOR & Controller Enclosure CONTROLLER CABIN ET(Retrofit/Nat'I Elec. Code) 40 I0 40 390 40 250 1,830 870 120 600 5,040 0 0 0 40 200 30 230 1,530 600 120 1,400 0 200 0 0 40 200 30 230 1,530 600 120 1,400 0 200 7& 42..4130 TOTAL: 9230 4350 4350 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FsTIMATFIR FXPFNnlT!IRF*q ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1 994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 43.4130 43.4130-1100 43.4130-1200 43.4130-1300 43.4130-1900 43-4130-1001 43.4130-3300 43.4130-3900 43.4130-3931 43.4130-3933 43.4130-3960 43.4130-5900 43.4 130-6028 43.4130-6029 43.4130-7043 43.4130-7044 43.4130-7045 43.4130-8021 43.4130-8022 43.4130-8956 43.4 130-92 ! 7 43.4 130-9320 43.4130-9323 43.4130-9332 43.4130-9333 43.4130-9334 43.4 130-9405 43.4130-9407 43.4130-9408 43.4130-9409 43.4130-9410 43.4130 TOTAL: LMD PA TERRA VISTA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EMERG. & REG. VEHCILE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL EXP-PROJECTS CAPITAL EXP-EQUIPMNT CAPITAL EXP-VEHICLES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES TERRA VISTA/BSLN RECNST HAVEN MED & RPLC PLA LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation MILLIKEN PARK EXPANSION CONTROLLER CABINET(Retrofit/Nat'l Elec. Code) IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parks HAVEN MEDIAN IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ADA RETROFIT: Milliken & Coyote Canyon IRRIGATION IMPRVMNTS TO CNTRL CONTROL: Parkw WOOD EXERCISE STATION REPLACEMENT DRAINAGE CORRECTION TO WEST GREENWAY IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS TO PARKWAYS 259,010 0 4,650 90,650 11,610 260 41,050 30,000 1,000 5,090 77,530 191310 2,000 21,600 22,750 0 130,930 23,150 413,780 0 14,600 216,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,556,970 168,980 0 4,650 62,520 12,220 0 42,600 30,000 1,000 5,180 70,440 211,990 7,000 0 2300 38,340 120,000 23,150 374,000 10,000 0 0 7,400 4,800 3,730 90,000 81,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 1391300 176,150 20 7,520 62,520 12,220 0 43,210 30,000 1,000 5,180 70,440 202,990 7,000 17,280 2,300 41,040 120,000 18,910 0 10,000 0 117,000 7,400 4,800 3,730 90,000 90,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 1,160,710 77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95_AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 44-4130 44-4130-1100 44-4130-1900 44.4130-1001 44.4130-3900 44-4130-3931 44-4130-3960 44-4130-5900 44-4130-6028 44-4130-6029 44-4130-7043 44-4130-8021 44-4130-8022 44-4130-9332 444130 TOTAL: F TIMATFIn FXPFNnlTIIRFg DESCRIPTION LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CONTROLLER CABINET(Retro~t/Nat'I Elec. Code) 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 80 30 240 500 70 30 370 1,060 0 8,320 280 130 0 11,110 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 0 0 240 490 70 30 370 1,060 0 0 280 130 200 2,870 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 0 0 240 490 70 30 370 1,060 0 0 280 130 200 2,870 45-4130 45-4130-1100 45-4130.1900 45-4130-1001 45-4130-3900 45-4 130-3931 45-4130-3933 45-4130-3960 45-4130-5900 45-4130-6028 45-4130-6029 45-4130-7043 45-4130-7044 454130-7045 454130-7047 .454130-8021 454130-8022 454130-9217 454130-9332 454130-9411 45-4130 TOTAL: LMD ~6 CARYN COMMUNITY REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE & PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CONTROLLER CABINET(Retrofit/Nat'l Elec. Code) TREE REPLANTING 7,790 2,730 6,330 5,510 !,910 500 2,730 20,540 165,250 5,000 168,180 1,500 0 0 65,100 2,550 0 0 0 455,620 35,980 13,310 6,330 4,540 1,910 500 2,670 20,670 160,130 10,500 0 0 0 0 60,000 2,550 15,000 3,000 1,500 338,590 14,280 13,310 6,330 8,200 1,910 500 2,670 20,670 160,130 10,500 30,000 0 750 330 60,000 2,550 15,000 62~.20 1,500 410,850 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 46-4130 46-4130-.1100 46-4130-1900 46-4130-1001 46-4130.3900 46-4130-3931 46-4130-3933 .46-4130-3960 46-4130-5900 46-4130-6028 46-4130-6029 46-4130-7043 46-4130-7044 46-4130-7045 46-4130-7047 46-4130-8021 46-4130-8022 46-4130-9217 46-4130-9324 46-4130-9332 46-4130-9334 46-4130-9412 46-4130 TOTAL: F TIMATFI' FXPFNnlTI IRF DESCRIPTION LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MILLIKEN AVE LANDSCAPE REHAB. CONTROLLER CABINET(Retrofit/Nat'l Elec. Code) HAVEN MEDIAN IRRIGATION IMPRVMNT. CALSENSE CONNECTIONS TO CENTRAL 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1,940 680 2,460 7,700 1,030 1,000 2,540 26,720 162,550 0 70,500 0 20,000 0 42,830 9,920 0 175,680 0 0 0 525,550 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 65360 24,180 2,480 28,060 1,030 1,000 5,860 36,670 269,820 30,000 0 3,000 0 3,000 136,000 81,200 10,000 0 3,200 7,950 10,000 718,810 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 66,790 24,180 2,480 28,060 1,030 ! ,000 5,860 36,670 180,900 30,000 14,830 3340 20,000 2,950 120,000 81,200 10,000 139,000 3,200 8,200 10,000 789,690 47-4130 47-4130-1100 47-4130-1900 47-4130-1001 47-4130-3900 47-4130-3931 47-4130-3933 47-4130-3960 47-4130-5900 47-4 130-6028 47-4130-6029 47-4130-7043 47-4130-7044 47-4130-7045 47-4130-802 i 47-4130-8022 47-4 i 30-9217 47-4130-9332 47-4130-9411 47-4 130-9412 47-4130 TOTAL: LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN. MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINTfLNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CONTROLLER CABINET(Retro~t/Nat'l Elec. Code) TREE REPLANTINGS CALSENSE CONNECTIONS TO CENTRAL 2,590 910 5340 10,690 1330 500 1,930 19,340 137,490 0 36,000 160 0 17,470 740 0 0 0 0 234,490 2300 850 5350 203,980 1330 500 1,580 21390 89,500 18,500 0 0 0 16,000 740 10,000 1,400 5,500 25,000 403,920 2,470 850 5350 203,980 1330 500 1,580 21390 77,280 18,500 1,000 0 1,500 16,000 740 10,000 3,200 5,500 25,000 396,170 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER F,c;TIMATFr FXPFNrMT!IRFs DESCRIPTION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 48.4130 48-4130.1100 48-4130-1900 48-4130.1001 48-4130.3900 48.4130-3931 48-4130-3960 48.4130-5900 48-4130-6028 48-4130-6029 48.4130-7043 48-4130-7044 48.4130-8021 48.4130-8022 48-4130-9217 48-4130-9332 48.4130 TOTAL: LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT/OPER GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT. / LANDSCAPE C/O: BUILDINGS C/O: EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CONTROLLER CABINET(Retro~t/Nat'l Elec. Code) 40 10 580 890 370 140 1,220 9,850 0 4,700 160 770 80 1200 0 20,010 0 0 580 600 370 150 1,200 4,000 6,500 0 0 1360 80 2,000 200 17,040 0 0 580 600 370 150 1,200 4,000 6,500 70 0 1290 80 2,000 1,810 18,650 55-4130 55-4130-1001 55-4130-3900 55-4130-3960 55-4130-5900 55-4130-6028 554130-8022 554130 TOTAL: SLD #1 ARTERIAL ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT. SRV-REG. MAINT ELECTRIC UTILITIES 89,960 18~00 3,200 21,250 5J70 185260 323,140 93380 17200 4,120 30,410 1,000 269,780 415,890 93380 17,200 4,120 30,410 !,000 269,780 415,890 564130 56-4130-1100 564130-1900 564130-1001 564130-3900 56-4130-3960 564130-5900 564130-6028 56-4130-8022 56--4130 TOTAL: SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTJOPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT ELECTRIC UTILITIES 7390 2,590 31,480 5,000 2,610 12,760 9,870 201,670 273370 0 0 32,610 0 2,570 18,060 0 206,030 259270 0 0 32,610 0 2,570 18,060 0 206,030 259,270 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 574130 574130-1001 574130-3960 574130-5900 574130-8022 574130 TOTAL: FRTIMATFn FXPFNIDITilRFS DESCRIPTION SLD #3 VICTORIA ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 21,450 1,580 12,760 123,610 159,400 '1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 21,180 1,810 13380 146,660 183,030 '! 994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 21,180 1,810 13380 146,660 183,030 584130 58-4130-1001 58-4130-1100 58-4130-1900 58-4130-3900 58-4130-3960 58-4130-5900 58-4130'~028 584130-8022 584130-9310 584130 TOTAL: SLD ~4 TERRA VISTA ASSESSMENT ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT/OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT ELECTRIC UTILITIES SIGNAL ~ TERRA VISTA & CHURCH 11,670 32,860 11,500 10,000 830 9,440 5,000 47,270 102,270 230,840 12,230 13,970 5,170 10,000 840 6,780 5,000 49,890 0 103,880 12,230 14,250 5,170 10,000 840 6,780 5,000 49,890 0 104,160 594130 594130-1100 594130-1900 594130-1001 594130-3900 594130-3960 594130-5900 5941308022 594130-9219 594130 TOTAL: SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTJOPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES ST.LT.INSTL.ROCHESTER & BANYAN 0 0 6340 12,780 480 1,920 27,330 24,200 73,050 4,080 1,510 6340 12,780 490 2,830 27,330 0 55,36O 4,270 1,510 6340 12,780 490 2,830 27,330 0 55,550 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FS;TIMATFr FXPFNnlTIIRF ACCOUNT NUMBER 60-4130 60-4130-1100 60-4130-1900 60-4130-1001 60-4130-3900 60-4130-3960 60-4130-5900 60-4130-6028 60-4130-8022 60-4130-9219 60-4130TOTAL: DESCRIPTION SLD ~6 INDUSTRIAL AREA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTJOPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES ELECTRIC UTILITIES STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 5,540 1,940 2,200 2,500 300 1,920 6,580 16,800 0 37,780 '1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 6,120 2,260 2,060 2,500 490 3,800 6,580 33,980 0 57,790 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 6,340 2,260 2,060 2,500 490 3,800 6,580 33,980 0 58,010 61-4130 61-4130-1100 61-4130.1900 61-4130-1001 61-4130-3900 61-4130-3960 61-4130-5900 61-4130-6028 61-4 130-8022 61-4130 TOTAL: SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTJOPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0 0 3,250 200 170 1,3 70 0 11,770 16,760 4,080 1,510 3,340 200 180 1,470 1,370 11,770 23,920 4,230 1,510 3,340 200 180 1,470 1,370 11,770 24,070 62-4130 62-4130-1001 62-4130-3900 62-4130-3960 62-4130-5900 62-4130-8022 62-4130TOTAL: SLD ~8 SOUTH ETIWANDA ASSESSMENT ADM1N MAINTJOPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES 200 130 50 350 3,860 4,590 200 130 50 510 3,860 4,750 200 130 50 510 3,860 4,750 63-4130 63-.4130-9000 63-4130 TOTAL: AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO. OF ARROW IMPROVEMENT FUND TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 127,920 127,920 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 64-4130 64-4130-1001 64-4130-3960 64.4130-5900 64-4130-7920 64.4130 TOTAL: F~TIMATF:I'~ FXPFNnlT!!RF~ DESCRIPTION AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO. OF ARROW REDEMPTION FUND ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN./GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 120 4,950 250 494,480 499,800 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 120 5,000 9,800 490,000 504,920 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 120 5,000 9,800 489,130 504,050 72.4225 72.4225-7044 72.4225-7045 72.4225 TOTAL: INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT & USAGE CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES 0 0 i0,000 210,000 220,000 10,000 220,500 230,500 75.4130 75.4130--6028 75-4130 TOTAL: CFD 88-2 ETIWANDAa!IGHLAND IMPROV. CONTRACT SERVICES 23570 23,570 76-4130 76.4130-1001 76-4130-3960 76-4130.5900 76-4130.7920 76-4130 TOTAL: CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV.(Flood) ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 2,400 3,960 29,980 393,150 429A90 2,400 2,900 29,980 257,150 292,430 2,400 2,900 29,980 178,430 213,710 78'4130 78'4130-6028 78'4130 TOTAL: AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT SERVICES 240 240 240 240 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 804637 80.-4637-1100 804637-1900 804637 TOTAL: FgTIMATF FXPFNnlTIIRF, DESCRIPTION AD 84.2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROV. REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS '1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 3,660 0 150 1,280 0 0 4,940 0 150 81-4637 814637-1001 814637-3960 814637-5900 814637-7920 814637 TOTAL: AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROV./REDEMP. ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 1,500 1,790 3,800 177,120 184,210 1,500 1,890 3,710 184,030 191,130 1,500 1,890 3,710 251,320 258,420 824130 824130-3900 824130-3960 824130-5900 824130-7920 824130 TOTAL: AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVES MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 500 1,660 3,260 95,460 100,880 834637 834637-1100 83-463%1900 83-4637-3900 834637-3960 :834637-6028 834637 TOTAL: AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL IMPROV. REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 12,580 4,400 500 10 0 17,490 13,780 5,100 500 390 38,500 58,270 14,100 5,100 0 390 0 19,590 874130 874130-1001 874130-3960 874130-5900 874130-7920 874130 TOTAL: CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK / REDEMPTION FUND ASSESSMENT ADMIN. GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 18,520 18,150 71,980 1,777,100 1,885,750 18,500 18,680 71,980 1,777~90 1,886,550 18,500 18,680 71,980 1,777,390 , 86,55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 90-4130 90-4130-1100 90-4130-1300 90-4130-1900 90-4130-1001 90-4130-3900 90-4 130-3931 90-4130-3932 90-4130-3933 90-4130-3960 90-4130-5900 90-4130-6028 90-4130-7920 90-4 130-8021 90-4130-8022 90-4130-9320 90-4130 TOTAL: FS;TIMATFn FXPFNnlTIIRF- DESCRIPTION PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE / REDEMPTION REGULAR SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT./OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG.& ROUTINE VEH./EQUIP.RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 230,150 0 80,550 137,260 51,100 24,000 6,000 0 13,910 127,360 10,000 831,680 101,650 ! 00,950 16,560 1,731,170 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 243360 0 90,040 137,240 62,040 24,000 6,000 1,000 12,420 121,990 17,000 680,180 96,650 95,950 0 1,587,870 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 253,900 930 90,040 137,240 66370 24,000 6,000 1,000 12,420 121,990 17,000 680,180 96,650 95,950 0 1,603,670 93-4 130 93-4130-1001 93-4130-3960 93-4130-5900 93-4130-7920 93-4130 TOTAL: AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL / REDEMPTION ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE 1,480 5,790 9,600 567,480 584350 1,480 5,660 9,400 555360 571,900 1,480 5,660 9,400 555360 571,900 95-4637 95-4637-1100 95-4637-1900 95-4637-3960 '95-4637-6028 95-4637-9325 95-4637 TOTAL: AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT IMPROV. REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS GENERAL LIABILITY CONT SRV-REG MAINT ALTA LOMA BASIN #2 EXCAVATION 26~80 9,130 50 5,000 195,760 236,020 14,510 5370 2,000 200,000 0 221,880 14,900 5370 2,000 0 0 22,270 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFIn FXPFNnlT!IRFs ACCOUNT NUMBER 96-4130 96-4130-1001 96.4130.3960 96-4130-5900 96-4130-7920 96-4130 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT/REDEMP. ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 1993-94 ADOPTED BUDGET 6,060 1,890 2,230 180,870 191,050 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET 6,060 1,880 2,220 180~00 190,160 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET 6,060 1,880 2,220 180,000 190,160 109-4647 METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM 109-4647-1 I00 109-4647-1900 109-4647-3900 109-4647-3933 109-4647-3960 109-4647-6028 109-4647--8021 109-4647-8022 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS EMERG.& ROUTINE VEHJEQUIP. RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 109-4647 TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,520 1300 11,700 500 900 57,600 3,500 17,000 96,020 3,590 1,300 11,700 500 900 57,600 3,500 17,000 96,090 110-4637 110-4637-1200 110-4637-3900 110-4637--6028 110-4637-7044 110-4637 TOTAL: USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT OVERTIME MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES C/O: EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,470 30,190 22,000 20,680 74340 125-4130 125-4130.1001 125-4130-3900 125-4130-3960 125-4130-5900 125.4130.7920 125-4130 TOTAL: CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE 70 0 3,980 30,160 398,000 432,210 70 0 3,980 30,160 398,000 432,210 131-4130 131-4130-3900 131-4130-6028 131-4130 TOTAL: AD 93-1 MASi COMMERCE CENTER MAINT & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES 0 5,000 5,000 0 15,000 DATE: TO:. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS OF INDUCEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FOUR MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL APARTMENT COMPLEXF..q BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMF. Nr}ATION Adopt the attached resolutions. BACKGROUND In August, 1993, the Agency provided a loan to Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) to assist in the acquisition of Rancho Verde Village, a 240 unit apartment complex located at Grove Avenue and 8th Street. As consideration for the loan, SCHDC agreed to provide 40% of the units as affordable to four targeted income groups for a minimum of 30 years. In August, 1994, the Agency approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with SCHDC, outlining the terms and conditions for the funding of the acquisition of existing housing units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Under the terms of the MOU, Agency funding of the acquisition of existing units is contingent on the Agency obtaining a loan for the construction of the Archibald Storm Drain and the "gap" loan for the Villa Del Norte project. In September, 1994, the Agency approved a Loan Agreement with Sanwa Bank for these projects. Under the terms of the MOU, and its subsequent Loan and Pledge Agreement, the Agency has pledged a total of $3 Million annually to SCFIDC to provide financing for the Archibald Storm Drain, a portion of the "gap" loan for Villa Del Norte, and the acquisition by SCHDC of existing apartment complexes in the City. A portion of the pledge, $1.2 Million annually, has been used to pay the Sanwa Bank Loan. The remaining portion, $1.8 Million, is to be used by SCHDC to acquire the existing apartment complexes. In December, 1994, the Agency approved the assignment of the SCHDC commitment to Sanwa Bank to finance a line of credit to acquire four apartment complexes located in the City. May 17, 1995 Staff Report - SCHDC Inducement Resolutions Page 2 ANAI.YSIS SCHDC has acquired one apartment complex, Sycamore Springs, and is in the process of arranging the acquisition of three others (Mountainside Apartments, Monterey Village, and Woodbend Apartments), pursuant to the terms of the Loan and Pledge Agreement. The line of credit arranged with Sanwa Bank is a short term, acquisition financing, and will be replaced by permanent financing, similar to that used for Rancho Verde Village. Because of Federal tax-exempt financing limitations, three of the projects others (Mountainside Apartments, Monterey Village) will be financed by City-issued bonds, and one (Woodbend Apartments) will be financed by Redevelopment Agency-issued bonds. The adoption of the attached resolutions will allow SCFIDC to obtain tax-exempt permanent financing for these complexes. Respectfully submitted, Redevelopment Manager RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR-THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MOUNTAINSIDE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), hereby determines and finds that a serious shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income exists within the City and the Agency desires to cause to be provided decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income within the City; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 52075) of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of multifamily rental housing and for the provision of capital improvements in connection therewith, and to make, or undertake, commitments to make, construction and permanent loans to housing sponsors to finance the development of such multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, The Southern California Housing Development Corporation, a nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Company") or its successors or assigns has requested the Agency to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing for the financing of the acquisition of a 384-unit apartment project on approximately 17.06 acres located at 9181 Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga, California, and known as the Mountainside Apartments (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the finandng of the Project will assist in increasing the number of affordable rental units and provide needed decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income in the City; and WHEREAS, the financing of the Project through the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds of the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $20,000,000 (the "Bonds") will provide for and promote the public health, safety, morals and welfare, and otherwise will be in the public interest and for the public benefit of the inhabitants of the City; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to use a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the the City and/or the Company for certain expenditures eligible for reimbursement (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") made prior to the date the Bonds are issued; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: . Section 1. Declaration of Official Intent. The City hereby declares its official intent, subject to the City's approval of the issuance of the Bonds, to use approximately $20,000,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse itself and/or the City and/or the Company for the Reimbursement Expenditures. It is intended that this Resolution shall constitute a declaration of "official intent" within the meaning of Section 1.103-8(a)(5) of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and Section 1.1502 of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Section 2. Bond Counsel. The law firm of Best, Best & Krieger, Riverside, California, is appointed as bond counsel to the City with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. Section 3. Nature of ObliGations. The obligations to be issued shall be special obligations of the City payable solely from revenues to be received by the City, pursuant to the agreements in connection with the financing of the Project, and shall not be a general obligation of the City, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Any expenses to be paid in connection with the issuance of the Bonds to refinance the Project shall be paid by the Company. Section 4. Other Approvals. The adoption of this Resolution shall not bind the City to issue bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taken or received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolution does not and shall not limit in any manner whatever the City's full discretion to deny any further permit or approval that may be necessary for ultimate completion of the proposed Project. RESOLUTION NO. q .,~ '- P '~/7/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE SYCAMORE SPRINGS APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), hereby determines and finds that a serious shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income exists within the City and the City desires to cause to be provided decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income within the City; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 52075) of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of multifamily rental housing and for the provision of capital improvements in connection therewith, and to make, or undertake, commitments to make, construction and permanent loans to housing sponsors to finance the development of such multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, The Southern California Housing Development Corporation, a nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Company") or its successors or assigns has requested the City to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing for the financing of the acquisition of a 240-unit apartment project on approximately 11 o4 acres located at 7101 Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California, and known as the Sycamore Springs Apartments (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the finandng of the Project will assist in increasing the number of affordable rental units and provide needed decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income in the City; and WHEREAS, the financing of the Project through the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds of the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $17,500,000 (the "Bonds") will provide for and promote the public health, safety, morals and welfare, and otherwise will be in the public interest and for the public benefit of the inhabitants of the City; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to use a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the City and/or the Company for certain expenditures eligible for reimbursement (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") made prior to the date the Bonds are issued; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. Declaration of Official Intent. The City hereby declares its official intent, subject to the City's approval of the issuance of the Bonds, to use approximately $17,500,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse itself and/or the Company for the Reimbursement Expenditures. It is intended that this Resolution shall constitute a declaration of "official intent" within the meaning of Section 1.103-8(a)(5) of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Section 2. Bond Counsel. The law firm of Best, Best & Krieger, Riverside, California, is appointed as bond counsel to the City with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. Section 3. Nature of ObliGations. The obligations to be issued shall be special obligations of the City payable solely from revenues to be received by the City, pursuant to the agreements in connection with the financing of the Project, and shall not be a general obligation of the City, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Any expenses to be paid in connection with the issuance of the Bonds to refinance the Project shall be paid by the Company. Section 4. Other ApOrOvalS. The adoption of this Resolution shall not bind the City to issue bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taken or received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolution does not and shall not limit in any manner whatever the City's full discretion to deny any further permit or approval that may be necessary for ultimate completion of the proposed Project. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE MONTEREY VILLAGE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), hereby determines and finds that a serious shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income exists within the City and the City desires to cause to be provided decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income within the City; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 52075) of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of multifamily rental housing and for the provision of capital improvements in connection therewith, and to make, or undertake, commitments to make, construction and permanent loans to housing sponsors to finance the development of such multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, The Southern California Housing Development Corporation, a nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Company") or its successors or assigns has requested the City to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing for the financing of the acquisition of a 220-unit apartment project on approximately 10.32 acres located at 10244 Arrow Route in Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, and known as the Monterey Village Apartments (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the financing of the Project will assist in increasing the number of affordable rental units and provide needed decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income in the City; and WHEREAS, the financing of the Project through the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds of the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $17,500,000 (the "Bonds") will provide for and promote the public health, safety, morals and welfare, and otherwise will be in the public interest and for the public benefit of the inhabitants of the City; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to use a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the City and/or the Company for certain expenditures eligible for reimbursement (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") made prior to the date the Bonds are issued; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. Declaration of Official Intent. 'The City hereby declares its official intent, subject to the City's approval of the issuance of the Bonds, to use approximately $17,500,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse itself and/or the City and/or the Company for the Reimbursement Expenditures. It is intended that this Resolution shall constitute a declaration of "official intent" within the meaning of Section 1.103-8(a)(5) of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Section 2. Bond Counsel. The law firm of Best, Best & Krieger, Riverside, California, is appointed as bond counsel to the City with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. Section 3. Nature of ObliGations. The obligations to be issued shall be special obligations of the City payable solely from revenues to be received by the City, pursuant to the agreements in connection with the financing of the Project, and shall not be a general obligation of the City, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Any expenses to be paid in connection with the issuance of the Bonds to refinance the Project shall be paid by the Company. Section 4. Other Approvals. The adoption of this Resolution shall not bind the City to issue bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taken or received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolution does not and shall not limit in any manner whatever the City's full discretion to deny any further permit or approval that may be necessary for ultimate completion of the proposed Project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager CONSIDERATION OF CO-SPONSORING HIGH SCHOOL ALL STAR GAME WITH OUAKES & DAILY BULLETIN TO BENEFIT "SEND AN UNDERPRIVILEGED KID TO CAMP" PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider a request from the Quakes and Daily Bulletin to co-sponsor the High School All Star Game on June 5, 1995, at the Adult Sports Stadium. As a City co-sponsored benefit event, the rental fee would not be assessed and the City would provide maintenance staff and facility support for a practice game on June 3, 1995, and for the June 5, 1995 event as is normally provided on Quakes baseball days. The Daily Bulletin is also requesting that if advance ticket sales exceed 5,000 and parking services are needed for the All Star Game that they be allowed to pay a maximum of $3,000 for parking for the attendees. Last year approximately 3,500 people attended the event. If 5,000 tickets are sold this year, parking service will be required for traffic control and public safety. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has received a request from the Quakes and Daily Bulletin to co-sponsor the High School All Star Game on June 5, 1995 (refer to attached proposal). This would be a fund-raising benefit for the Daily Bulletin's "Send an Underprivileged Kid to Camp" Program. Staff recommends the approval of this request based upon the benefits to underprivileged youth in the Inland Empire. This event would also provide promotional opportunities to encourage Inland Empire residents to enjoy events conducted at the Adult Sport Stadium. FISCAL IMPACT City expenses for the benefit event would be offset in part by ticket and concession revenues received from the event. ta. Community Services Manager 1995 High School All-Star Baseball Game Proposal Proposing a collaborative agreement to provide an Inland Valley High School All-Star Baseball Game on Monday - June 5, 1995. Ticket prices will be $3.00 for green box seats (reserved) and $2.00 for red seats and bleachers (festival seating). Net proceeds from the game to go to the Send high school booster clubs. E!lgibic Schools will be: Alta Loma Etiwanda Ambassador Christian Fontaria Ayala Fontana A B Miller Bonita (lanesha Boys Republic Garey Calvary Baptist La Veto6 Lutheran Chaffey Montelair Chino Ontario Clarcmont Onm'io Christian Damicn Pomona Diamond Bar Rancho Cucamonga Don Lu go Rialto Eisenhower San Dimes Upland W~bb Teams will be on a North - South split with I-I0 bein the dividing line. Some adjustment may need to be made to make teams even in terms of cnro~ment. ' Inland Valley Daily Bulletin will provide: *Player liability ~lcase. *Electronic and print media notification. *Selection process for the 46 players and 12 coaches. '4 umpires *Sell unreserved tickets at main office. *Special section to re~eognize the athletes *Hats for each player. *Player photo card for each player. *Certificate of participation. ,Commemorative Baseball for each player and coach. ,Reception for the players and coaches at the Daily Bulletin ,Advertising to promote participation in the event (Approx. $7,000 value) *Scorecard for the event (wilt have one advertiser on card) *Print unreserved tickets for the event (will have one advertiser on the back of the ticke0 ,Announcer and scripts for the game. *Name recognition of the other eollaborating partners on all printed materials and introduction of the sponsors the night of the event. *Credentials - photo and press. re e of the event. *Pre-game and post-game cove g *Pay City of Rancho Cucamonga 10% of ticket sales at the office. DAILY BULLETIN AD SER'.J TEL:714-948-9~97 May Quakes Baseball will provide: *Locker Room for the game. ,Announcing Booth for the game time. *Box seats for the vL~iting baseball scouts (not to exce~ 30). *Two sky boxes for use by the Daily Bulletin *Press Box. *Open Conc~..ssion stands and Quakes store during the ~ame. ,T-Shin for each player and coach, providing any nddiuonal shins for re-~le at Quakes Store. *Appearance of Tremor and Aftershock during the game. *Host ~hc All-Star teams and coaches at Tuesday. May 30, game and introduce them during game t~me to promote ticket sales. *Provide PSA's, to begin th~ 4th week of May, promoting the upcoming All Star game during the regular home games of the Quakes. ,Ticket Sales through Quakes Ticket Office. *Cover cost of ushers, ticket takers and game day personnel *Post-game refreshments for players and coaches. *Pay the City of Rancho Cucamonga 10% of tickets sold at the stadium. City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide: ,Parking services for Stadium and parking area om June 5, 1995. (Parking arrangements to be reconfu'med 1 week prior to event. ff advanc~ ticket sales exceed 5,000 in number parking will be paid for by the Daily Bulletin in an amount not W exceed $3.000.) *Provide the sutdium for player practice on June 3. 1995. ,Maintenance and cleanup of the stadium. *Prepping of the field pre- and post - game. Rancho Cueamonga Sheriffs Department: ,Reserves will provide Security for the event (Minimum 2 of officers. Maximum of 6 officers) at no charge. DRIL",' BULLETIN ~D SER%~ TEL:714-948-9~97 MaW 08,~b l,.':xo r~o.,v,,.~ r..v,-~ 1995 Inland Valley All-Star Baseball Calendar of Events Week of May 21,1995 - Coaches announced. Week of May 28, 1995 -1995 Inland Valley All-Star Baseball players announced. May 24, 1995 - 6:30 Reception and Photo session with the players and coaches. June 1, 1995 - High School All-Star Baseball special section publishes. June 3, 1995 - Practice session at the stadium. Time TBA. June 5, 1995 - 6:00 p.m. 1995 Inland Valley High School All-Star Baseball Game. rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO SUBMIT TO SANBAG PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN FISCAL YEARS 1996/2002 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council authorize the Engineering Division to submit to SANDBAG the City's projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1996/2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. B AC KGROUND/ANAL Y S I S The 1991 ISTEA requires the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), as the Melxopolitan Planning Organization (MPO), to include a financial Plan with its adoption of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), which demonstrates that the region has the capacity to fund its program. SANDBAG has requested that each Local Agency within its jurisdiction have their goveming body approve projects for inclusion into the 1996/2002 RTIP. Staff reasonably expects that sufficient revenues will be generated in the next seven years to fund the projects submitted to SANDBAG for inclusion into the 1996/2002 RTIP. Projects involving work on Federal or State Highways and Projects that are included in the County's Congestion Management Program have been included in the seven-year RTIP Program as well as any project that might reasonably expect to receive Federal or State funding within this time frame. Also, expected development projects within public right-of-way have been included. Most of these projects currently exist in the 1993/99 RTIP; however, SANBAG wants each agency to re-submit existing RTIP Projects along with new submittals. Projects with limits and a brief description are listed on the attached project list. City Engineer WJO:MO:Iy Attachments DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II FOR THE ROADWAY WIDENING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET INTERSECTION AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE RECOMMENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the roadway widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS This report presents an environmental assessment initial study for the roadway widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection. In conformance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entails removal of existing curb and gutter at the intersection, relocate utility poles, relocate traffic signal equipment, widen the street for a right turn lane and bus bay and construct a new curb and gutter. It is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as categorically exempt. City Engineer WJO:JS:sd Attachment Esor, u'r,o q 5' cv 7 Ce A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROADWAY WIDENING AT ARCHIBALD AVE FOURTH STREET INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed roadway widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street. WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as mended. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucarnonga hereby approves the Environmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the roadway widening at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. ' PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1995. C,,l;h ST. .,,.~N BERNARI}I~ O RD '~DDTH~ ~_~>.1 II I > > > ¢ .¢ ¢ ~, CITY .¢ z m >- ._~ ~' > m., ..j ~ 4: CENTER 7 uJ uJ 'r > ~,m > CUCAMDNGA _ ~ GAUSTI PARK STREET 4~h STREET ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4TH ST & ARCHIBALD AVE. INTERSECTION VICINITY MAP ! IDT TO ~i > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I - INITIAL STUDY General Information , Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Rancho Cucamonl;a. 10500 Civic Center Drive - Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 Address of project: Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Rancho Cucamonga. 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga. Califomia 91730. Contact: Joe Stofa - (909~ 989-1862 ext 2372 Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: N/A City_ of , , List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by City, regional, State and Federal Agencies: Street Closure Permits. Encroachment Permit to the City of Ontario and City Council's Approval Existing zoning district: N/A Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Provide Westbound Acceleration Lane and a Right Turn l,ane on Fourth Street and Construct Bus Bay at the Northeast Comer of Archibald Avenue Project Description and Effects: 8. Site Size: 4-20,000 square feet 9. Square Footage: N/A 10. Number of floors of construction: N/A 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: N/A 12. Attach plans N/A 13. Proposed scheduling: Tentatively April 1996 14. Associated project: N/A 15. Anticipated incremental development. N/A 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices of rents, and type of household size expected: N/A 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: N/A 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: N/A -1- 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: N/A 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. X X X X 29. 30. 31. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flamables or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. X X X Environmental Setting: See attached 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. -2- /o7 ATTACHMENT- PART 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EFFECTS: 25 AND 27 Noise, vibrations, dust and odor will increase at the project site during construction operation. Upon completion of the project, all noise, vibrations, dust and odors caused by this project during construction will cease to exist and will return to its normal state. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: 33 AND 34 The project is located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street. Both are major arterials with existing curb and gutter. At the northeast comer is a vacant lot zoned industrial. At the southwest comer a vacant area and apartments zoned residential. There are landscaped monument signs located at the northeast and northwest comers. Generally, the topography at the project site including the vacant areas is flat. The existing A.C. pavement has an average of 1.50% grade from centerline. The project will not have a significant effect up. on the environment nor will it be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: ~i' - ~'- ~ ~x" Signature: ~ ~'S.. ~ ~ -3- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDy ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BACKGROUND I. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10500 Civic Center Drive - Rancho Cucamonga. California. 91730 - (909) 989-1862 3. Date of Checklist Submitted January 10. 1995 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Intersection ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all 'yes' and 'maybe' answers are required on attached sheets). YES 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: am Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over covering of the soil? C, Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d, The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X Page 2 b. The creation of objectionable odors: C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the rate and amount of surface water runofF?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d, Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e, Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h, Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? Plant I .ire. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C, Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X .X X X X Page 3 10. Animal life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell-fish, benthie organisms or insects)? b, Reduction of the numbers of any umque, rare or endangered species of animals? Co Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Lil/ht and Glare. will the proposal produce new light or glare? Land Use and Platruing Considerations. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? C, A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreational oppommities? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? Possible interference with an emergenc.y response plan or an emergency evacuauon plan? MAYBE X NO X X X X X X X X X X X Page 4 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? f. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. ~. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? YES MAYBE X X NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Page 5 d. Water supply? e. Waste water facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 18. 19. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a, b, d, Will the proposal result in the alteration of, or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 2 1. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X Page 6 III. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). C, Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cnmulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two of more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMF. NTAI. EVALUATION (Narrative description of environmental impacts.) SEE ATTACHMENT - PART II yES MAYBE NO X X X IV .DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. X I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19, Class 1 C, Section 15301 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. Signature Title ATTACHMENT- PART II Discussion of Environmental Impacts: Noise a. Existing noise level will increase due to equipment operations during construction period only. The public living and/or working at the residential, commercial and industrial buildings along the project area may be disturbed during construction operation. At any rate, these equipment noises can be mitigated by the installation of noise attenuators and restriction of hours of operation. 13. Transportation/Circulation d & f During construction, alteration of the present pattem of vehicular and pedestrian circulation will be needed. Traffic control signs and delineators will be placed along the project site. Slower traffic will be experienced during the construction period. There will however, be an increase in traffic to those streets close to the project site. Any possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. tic,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE (1) CONVENTIONAl. TRUCK CAB- CHASSIS SCHWARzE MODEl, 7000 AIR STREET SWEEPER FROM ROAD MACHINERY. INCORPORATED, OF CHINO, CAI.IFORNIA, IN TI4'E AMOUNT OF $119,944,39 TO RE FUNDED FROM GENF. RAI. FUND ACCOUNT 01.-4645-7045 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of one (1) Conventional Track Cab- Chassis Schwarze Model 7000 Air Street Sweeper from Road Machinery, Incorporated, of Chino, California, in the amount of One Hundred Nineteen Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Four and 39/100, ($119,944.39). The purchase to be funded from General Fund Account No. 01-4645-7045 as is budgeted to meet the requirements of the Best Management Practices under Permit No. 8000200. BACKGROUND/ANAl .YSIS Recently City staff requested a price proposal for one (1) Schwarze Model 7000 Street Sweeper mounted on an International Track Chassis. Road Machinery, Incorporated, recently sold a Schwarze sweeper to the City of Redondo Beach with specifications similar to the specifications of the Schwarze sweeper the City of Rancho Cucamonga now owns. Road Machinery, Incorporated, offered what is called a "piggy back purchase "to the City of Rancho Cucamonga where by they have accepted to receive a purchase order from the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the same price as the Redondo Beach unit, with modifications to the broom operations. In order to maintain continuity in our fleet we have opted for the International Chassis be furnished instead of the Ford Chassis furnished to Redondo Beach. Also, we requested a tachograph as fumished with our other Schwarze sweeper be included. The options increased the cost by less than 7% and is acceptable by staff. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET SWEEPER May 17, 1995 Page 2 Road Machinery, Incorporated, has agreed to accept a purchase order fi'om the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a Schwarze Model 7000 Sweeper at the same price as the Redondo Beach trait but with additions of the options as requested by staff. The Schwarze sweeper is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the City specifications on the performance safety and equipment standards expected. The purchase of the above sweeper is to replace Unit #642, a three wheel FMC 3000 Air Sweeper. Respectfully submitted, William J. O%leil City Engineer WJO:GV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor, Members of the City Council, Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O?qeil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE INSTAI.1,ATION OF TVqO BASEBAI.1, SCORE BOARDS AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK. REOUESTED AND FUNDED BY THE ALTA LOMA LITT1 ,E LEAGUF,. RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the installation of two baseball score boards at Heritage Community Park, requested and funded by the Alta Loma Little League. BACKGROUND / ANAI,YSIS: On April 20, 1995 the Park and Recreation Commission approved the concept and location of the two baseball score boards to be installed at the northeast and northwest baseball fields in Heritage Community Park as requested by the Alia Loma Little League. Plans for this installation have been prepared by Ian Davidson, Landscape Architect and submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. Upon plan approval, no fee permits will be issued to Alia Lome Little League's contractor, Owen Electric for the construction of this project within the City's park. The capital improvement ande operation costs for this project will be fully paid for by the Alta Loma Little League. City Engineer ttq r mmmmm m. mflm~ I1:!111 Heritage Co Hefttale Community Park 5546 BetTi Strut ldy 4. lgf7 - *! , d~ we. r '% 1991 Features 1990 o I tit" ' WINsd ~ fie 201fOutfiddi60'bPslL 4t*PtsimtsMomdeimiadnme · I D" -l i, iljtmd Playfidd ri 2lB'Omfistd Dimm. 60' bPsslm. 4~P!m/snMoamwisllmtsme o I Dr'* dL.lllldPIlyfiddf3so 330'OutfialiDtmsmm.~fBamPmls, o i Dedlmmai,~mmSmmmrPidd-E 291*lmalm, lS0*eidmmaeaINsss o I DedlmtmLilkmdSomsrPmW -W )4IT Imlkl.~0'wkldlmdmlPem o I 'l .... mmCm o 8.usmm Cm'm (.7 mdm) · Nmawal Am aml Ham Tr~l · 2 O o 2 o I · 1 o I 0 0 0 o 2 Rn 10-91) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY ADJACENT TO SANTA CLARA COURT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14116, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, SUBMITTED BY SHEFFIELD-ALTA LOMA 55, LTD. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 14116 and the disposition of City owned property adjacent to Santa Clara Court, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and resolution and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Tract 14116, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, in the Low Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1992, for the division of 4.09 acres into 19 lots. The Developer, Sheffield-Alia Loma 55, Ltd., is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following mounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Bond: $120,100.00 $ 60,050.00 $ 3,300.00 One of the conditions of approval of this tract directs the City to process and quitclaim Lot C of Tract 12952 adjacent to Santa Clara Court. On February 22, 1995, the Planning Commission determined that the said proposed quitclaim would conform with the general Plan. Through these CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14116 - SHEFFIELD-ALTA LOMA 55, LTD May 17, 1995 Page 2 proceedings, the Developer will obtain said Lot C of Tract 12952 and use the land as part of the lots for Tract 14116. Lot C was created expressly for this purpose during the master planning process of Tract 12952. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's office. Letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. CC&R's have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O%leil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments SOLU XO c> 7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14116, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14116, submitted by Sheffield-Alta Loma 55, Ltd., and consisting of 19 lots located on the south side of Highland Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on December 9, 1992, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14116 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by Sheffield-Alta Loma 55, Ltd.; as developer, and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the ofters for dedi~tion and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14116 is hereby approved anct the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. SOtUnON NO. q-S* 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14116 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the ptrovisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional terntory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ./ ~.NT~ ~XR~XA~ .~ NOT_: ,' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO T'A='/4//~' STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET I,IGHTS: Dist. 5800L SI S2 4 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: TRACT 14116 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000~. 22.000I, 2 27.5001, I ANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. L1 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel DU S1 S2 L1 N/A 18 18 18 18 Non-Turf S.F. 4.566 Trees Ea. 48 Form Date 11/16/94 RESOLUTION NO. q..~-- C.~ 7' ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in that certain parcel of real property generally located at the easterly end of Santa Clara Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and hereinaf~er referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description of said property is set forth in that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference set forth herein. (ii) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows: "A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and enjoy real and personal property, and control and dispose of it for the common benefit." (iii) Califomia Government Code Section 37351 provides in pertinent pan, as follows: The legislative body (City Council) may... dispose of, and convey such property for the benefit of the City ..... " (iv) The Planning Commission of the City ofRancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on February 22, 1995, that disposing of said property, as herein contemplated, would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (v) Said property was acquired by the City ofRancho Cucamonga in fee, for sidewalk and street tree maintenance purposes the need for which has been superseded by the development of Tract No. 14116. (vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer necessary or convenient for the purposes for which it was acquired. (vii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property. (viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution has occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: RESOLUTION NO. May 17, 1995 Page 2 and correct. All facts stated in the Recitals, Pan A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be tree 2. This Council hereby finds that the quit claiming of said property to the persons described in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RECORDING REQUESTED 8Y AND WHEN IIECOll01D MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Nero MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX l COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED, OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LF. B8 LIENI AND ENCUMBIqANCE8 REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE. Signature Of D~lmnt or Agent ~etmmlnlng tax. FIrm Neme -J Corporation Quitclaim Deed FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to SHEFFIELD-ALTA LOMA 55, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED pARTNERSHIP the foUowing described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A' AND "B" ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATI~ BY: ATTEST: LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT C OF TRACT NO. 12952 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 194, PAGES 12 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIAGRAM OF LOT C, TRACT 12952 BOOK 194, PAGES 12 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (/j_ ~ S,.ANTA CLARA CT. ~115'46'~ I0.00' LOT .~ 48 :, _~/~t~'~ ,e,-----EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT 12952 LOT t C ~ 44°0811- W 29.47' LOT 47 108°28'32" 50.00' 94.66' 69.42' N.T.S. ~ 0 96 EXHIBIT B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~eil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR BIKE LOCKERS AND RACKS AT CIVIC CENTER, CITY YARD AND METROLINK, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $17,462.50 ($15,875.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 14-4 158-7044 TO TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION RKCOMMF, NDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for Bike Lockers and Racks at Civic Center, City Yard and Metrolink, to the lowest responsive bidder Trautwein Construction for the amount of $17,462.50 ($15,875.00 plus 10% contingency) to be fimded from Air Quality Management Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 18, 1995, for the subject project. Trautwein Construction is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of $15,875.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $34,910.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff' has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Please note the Civic Center portion of the project was withdrawn during the bidding process. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:ML:dlw Attachments DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O?qeil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer APPROVAL TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 21, 1995, TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHMENT OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ALONG FOURTH STREET; 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET: USING RULE 20A FUNDS. RECOMMENDATION Approval of a Resolution setting a Public Hearing for June 21, 1995 to consider the establishment of an Underground Utility District No. 95-01 along Archibald Avenue and along Fourth Street; 1,600 feet north and east of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street, using Rule 20A funds. B AC KGROUND/ANA l, YSI S Southern California Edison allocates undergrounding funds to each City based on the number of electrical meters in the City. The use of these funds is governed by the so-called Rule 20 regulations. Rule 20A covers all activities for undergrounding and is paid for by SCE except modifications or replacements of electrical service panels for users. Rule 20A funds are reserved for heavily used streets, and/or for scenic purposes. The project must also be a minimum of 600 feet in length. The City contacted Edison with a request to have Edison underground some lines along a portion of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street running 1,600 feet north and east of the intersection of these two streets. Edison suggested the City use the Rule 20A funds to perform the work. However, it should be noted that these poles also have 66KV lines on them. This means the 66KV would remain overhead and the poles would not be removed. What is removed are the lower cross arms that carry the 12KV. We would see then two of the existing four cross arms removed along with the underground to overhead feeder lines. Presently there are two private structures within the proposed District: One on the west side of Archibald Avenue and one on the south side of Fourth Street. Both maintain overhead service. The _d STAFF REPORT UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95-01 MAY 17, 1995 Page 2 structure on Archibald Avenue is a house and the structure on Fourth Street is an office complex used by the Environmental Agency of the County. The lines would be undergrounded across Archibald Avenue and across Fourth Street to an on-site pole for connection to their meter and electric connection. The conversion costs for the two existing structures should be minimal. Staff recommends the City provide the conversion for each. The conversion would require a minor modification in the overhead service connection, similar to the one performed on Base Line Road under another Underground Utility District. That conversion cost the City less than $500 for two structures. They will continue the existing services On-Site via overhead fees. Therefore, there should be no public interference with service or any need for additional contributions to complete the project from property owners. The City's current balance in the Southem Califomia Edison Rule 20-A account is approximately $700,000.00. The undergrounding at Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street is estimated to cost $530,000.00. Respectfully submitted, William J. O~eil City Engineer WJO:MO:Iy RESOLUTION NO. q.._.~ - ~Z)~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT 95-01, ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENIlE AND ALONG FOURTH STREET; 1,600 FEET NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET: USING RULE 20A FUNDS. WHEREAS, it has been recommended that an Underground Utility District No. 95-01, hereinafter called District, be formed; and WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 13.04 establishes a procedure for the creation of Underground Utility Districts and requires as the initial step in such procedure the holding of a public hearing to ascertain whether public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the removal of overhead wires and associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar associated service in any such district. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia as follows: SECTION 1: That an Underground Utility District No. 95-01 be formed, in the following described area: Those portions of Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands Tract, Map Book 4 Page 9, as recorded in the office of the San Bemardino County Recorder, California, lying within a strip of land 300 feet wide, the centerline of said strip being the centerline of Archibald Avenue running from 4th Street (San Bemardino Avenue) to 1,600 Feet North; and the Centerline of 4th Street (San Bemardino Avenue) running from Archibald Avenue to 1,600 Feet East, said streets shown on said Map. SECTION 2: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga on June 21, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the removal of overhead wires and associated overhead streettires and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar associated service in the District herein described. SECTION 3: At such hearing, all persons interested shall be given an oppommity to be heard. Said hearing may be continued from time to time as may be determined by City Council. SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall notify all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and utilities concemed, of the time and place of such hearing and by mailing a copy of this Resolution to such property owners and utilities concerned at least ten (10) days prior to the date thereof. SECTION 5: The area proposed to be included in the District is shown upon that certain map entitled "Underground Utility District No. 95-01 ", which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. AVM ~I3A00 "~ I-- I,- ~-~ "C>-j F 0~ H3NV~ 5VOfI'1 V 3nN~V O'IVBIHO~IV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Cindy Norris, AICP, Associate Planner/CDBG Coordinator CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATFD PI AN. THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BI OCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1995-96. AND AMENDMENTS TO THF CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN - The review and adoption of the Federally required Consolidated Plan, which covers the five-year pedod from FY 1995-1999; the Annual Action Plan for FY 1995-96, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a grant of $1,024,000 and $37,644 in Program Income; and review of required amendments to the City's Federal Citizens' Participation Plan. Continued from May 3, 1995. RFCOMMENDATION The City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony regarding the Consolidated Plan, Amendments to the Citizens' Participation Plan and annual review of projects; adopt the attached resolution approving the Consolidated Plan, making all findings, determinations, and certifications and adopting policies, and therein, authorizing the City Manager to submit the Consolidated Plan to HUD and any amendments thereto. ANALYSIS The May 3, 1995 City Council meeting was continued to May 17, 1995, to allow a Council subcommittee of Rex Gutierrez and Jim Curatalo to review and recommend additional funding allocations for public service providers. Based on this review it was determined that a one-time allocation of $6,000 could be designated to the Boys and Girls' Club and $3,000 to Foothill Family Shelter. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 17, 1995 Page 2 Funding sources were $4,500 from the Tapia Via Street Design project, and $4,500 from the Graffiti Removal Program. The funds from Tapia Via will involve the capital allocation which will be replaced in the following year during the construction phase of this project. The Graffiti Removal program will remain funded above the Engineering Division's annual request. This recommendation for reallocating funds for this year only does not impact the schedule for completing the goal for the Southwest Cucamonga project. It was determined that the new allocations would be considered a one-time grant. Further, the subcommittee members indicated a desire to revisit the City Council's public services funding policy for the CDBG program. Staff concurs with the importance of establishing funding policies and looks forward to working with the Council on the matter. ~r~~~ City Planner BB:CN:sp Exhibits: Attachment "A" - City Council Staff Report of May 3, 1995 Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlVlONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 3,1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Cindy Norris, Associate Plarmer/CDBG Coordinator CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1995-96. AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN -- The review and adoption of the Federally required Consolidated Plan, which covers the five-year period from FY 1995-1999; the Annual Action Plan for FY 1995-96, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a grant of $1,024,000 and $37.644 in Program Income; and review of required amendments to the City's Federal Citizens' Participation Plan. RECOMMENDATION The City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony regarding the Consolidated Plan. Amendments to the Citizens' Participation Plan, and annual review of projects; and adopt the attached resolution approving the Consolidated Plan making all findings, determinations, certifications and adopting policies, 'therein authorizing the Mayor to submit the Consolidated Plan to HUD and any amendments thereto. BACKGROUND Since the adoption of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act in 1990, the Federal govemment has required jurisdictions to develop a more comprehensive long range planning format through which to address the use of Federal funds (such as Community Development Block Grant). The first planning effort required by HUD was the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, or CHAS. The CHAS was a comprehensive document that evaluated all aspects of housing in the community and developed strategies to meet identified housing needs. However, the CHAS only evaluated housing needs and did not look at other community development needs. Additionally, it added an extensive paperwork burden and did not coordinate with other Federal submittal requirements. As a result, HUD has developed a new system that is intended to coordinate and consolidate as many Federal requirements as possible into a single plan. The result of this effort is the Consolidated Plan. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 3, 1995 Page 2 ANALYSIS THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive five-year strategy that addresses the use of Federal grant/entitlement funds (including CDBG funds) for the purpose of meeting the goals of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic oppommities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The Consolidated Plan combines the application and reporting requirements for four Federal formula grant programs and it replaces the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) and the Community Development Block Grant Final Statement. The Consolidated Plan is composed of three parts: 1 ) The first section of the Plan evaluates the Housing and Community Development needs for the City. This includes an assessment of housing needs for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income families, including the needs of homeless individuals and families. In addition, a housing market analysis was completed that includes a review of available homeless and special needs facilities, as well as a review of bamers to affordable housing; 2) Based on this information, a five-year strategic plan was developed which includes priorities for assisting categories of residents by income level, objective statements, proposed programs, as well as accomplishments that are expected to be achieved in the next five years. In addition, non-housing community development needs were addressed; 3) From the prior information. an Annual Action Plan was developed that provides a one-year investment plan which outlines intended use of resources, sets goals for the number of individuals and families to be assisted by income level, and describes activities to be undertaken. An executive summary of the Consolidated Plan is included as Attachment A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL PROJECT FUNDING CDBG funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cities and counties based on a formula which considers the community's population, extent of poverty, and age of housing stock. To be eligible for CDBG funding, activities must at least meet one of the two following criteria: 1) Improve the living environments or employment oppommities of low- and moderate-income persons, either by providing benefits directly to lower-income persons or by providing improvements to areas occupied primarily by lower-income persons; 2) Prevent or eliminate community blight or blighting influences. In addition, CDBG regulations provide that at least 70 percent of all funds must be directed to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for fiscal year 1995-96, 100 percent benefit low-and moderate-income persons. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 3, 1995 Page 3 This year's grant allocation of $1,024,000 represents a 28 percent increase over last year's, up from $800,000. The City received a total of 18 proposals, of which 12 were for public service related activities. In evaluating proposals, first priority was given to those projects that were in progress and on-going such as Southwest Cucamonga street improvements, Lions Center West ADA Improvements, and the Home Improvement Program. Capital Improvement: With regard to Capital improvement projects, the Engineering Division, in conjunction with the Consolidated Plan, developed a five-year improvement program which is outlined in the Strategic Plan and included in Attachment B. The program is based on target area data assessment, field research, and citizen request. Of primary concern was the completion of the Southwest Cucamonga streets and related improvements. Construction of 9th Street will complete the original target area. Improvements to Tapia Via Drive and Rancheria Drive are the next priorities because of their proximity to the Southwest Cucamonga target area and based on prior citizen request. Monte Vista Street, between Amethyst and Archibald, will also be considered a priority. However, Monte Vista has not yet been approved as a qualified target area by HUD. It is not located in a Census Block Group that itself qualifies; therefore, a special survey for this street was completed in February to obtain the necessary income information. Community Facilities: Community facility improvements are intended to be provided, to the extent possible, based on CDBG eligibility requirements. While the Lions Center complex is not located in a qualified target area, nor does it serve a targeted clientele, handicap improvements to the facilities are eligible. Funds to complete the extensive improvements required at Lions West, to bring it into conformance with ADA requirements, have been banked for the past two years. Additional funds will be provided this year in order to allow completion of the improvements. Only minor handicap improvements are eligible and required at Lions East, which should be completed this year as part of a larger City Rehabilitation effort. Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement program has been in existence since 1990. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $25,000, and grants of up to $5,000. Since the program's inception it has been overwhelmed with requests for assistance from both the single- family and mobile-home community. There are currently 46 residents on the waiting list for single- family rehabilitation and 27 residents on the mobile-home waiting list. With the funds available to this program, the City has been able to complete 22 units on average over the last three years, with 26 units completed in the 1993-94 fiscal year. Many of those assisted in the last year required emergency roof repair/replacements because of the past wet winter season. Because of funding limitations, the program was only able to complete one loan request. The remaining 25 units assisted were funded with grants. Units receiving assistance through loans typically require a larger mount of funds resulting in fewer residents overall that can be assisted. However, the program's goal is to increase the number of loans, as this provides return Home Improvement income in subsequent years. Public Services: Federal regulations allow communities to use up to 15 percent of their grant allocation to fund public service activities. The amount recommended for FY 1995-96 is the same as in the previous year, as shown in Attachment C. In prior years, there were concerns with increasing the number of public service providers because of the uncertain nature of the funds and priority of on-going capital improvement projects. Additionally, those projects that were funded met the priority of assisting an immediate public health and safety need, such as food and shelter. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 3, 1995 Page 4 A youth prevention program sponsored by the YWCA was added at the Ciiy Council's direction during the prior program year. Should additional public service providers be added in this program year, it would be staffs recommendation that the transitional homeless shelter program, provided by Foothill Family Shelter, be considered in order to provide a comprehensive homeless shelter/services program in conjunction with programs already receiving funding. Homelessness, and near homelessness, is a problem in every jurisdiction and for the region as a whole in the Inland Empire. The City currently funds assistance for short term emergency needs, but does not address longer term assistance to help families transition into permanent housing. A summary of the public service provider applications is provided in Attachment D along with an Evaluation Checklist provided in Attachment E. Program Recommendations: The current recommendations for program funding for the 1995-96 fiscal year are as follows: ESTIMATED FY 1995-96 FY 1995-96 FY 1994-95 NEW TOTAL REPROGRAM ALLOCATION AMOUNT ADMINISTRATION 0 128,400 128,400 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9th Street Design/Construction Wheelchair Ramps Sidewalk Repair Tapia Via Drive Design Lions Center West Lions Center East 590 0 0 0 204,470 0 264,000 20,260 22,760 30,000 228,520 35,350 264.590 20.260 22.760 30.000 32.990 35350 HOME IMPROVEMENT Home Improvement Oldtimers' Foundation 20,000 * 0 247,804 8,O00 267,804 8,000 PUBLIC SERVICES Graffiti Removal Fair Housing Landlord Tenant House of Ruth Homeless Outreach West End Hunger-SOVA YWCA 0 0 0 0 430 0 0 27,510 11,300 8,570 7,600 7,570 7,000 7,000 27,510 11,300 8,570 7,600 7,570 7,000 7,000 * Includes Program Income CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 3, 1995 Page 6 A summary comparison of CDBG fund allocations for fiscal years 1994-95 and 1995-96 is included in Attachment C. Program Income: Program Income was derived from several sources in the last year, the sale of the Ledig House. repayment of deferred loans, and reimbursement by the Cucamonga County Water District for work completed on a waterline. A total of $28,051 in funds were reimbursed from the sale of the Ledig House. An additional $7,745 received in payment from a deferred loan which was repaid in a prior year, but not budgeted, and will therefore be included as a carryover. These housing related funds, totaling $35,796, are to be programed to the Home Improvement Program. An additional $9,593 was reimbursed from construction of a waterline. These capital funds will be programmed to the Tapia Via Design project. CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN The City is required to adopt a Citizens' Participation Plan that sets forth policies and procedures for citizen participation with regard to Federal grant/entitlement programs. The City's Citizen Participation plan has been amended in conformance with provisions of the Consolidated Submission Final Rule, Section 91.105, and is included in the Consolidated Plan. CORRESPONDENCE Notice of availability of the draft Consolidated Plan, of proposed annual funding allocations and of the public hearing was published one month prior to the meeting, on April 4, 1995, in the Inland Valley Dailv Bulletin, as a display ad. Notice was also published in the LaVoz newspaper on April 6, 1995. Nitices were also mailed to adjacent public agencies, including the Housing Authority of San Bemardino County; area public service providers; public housing residents; and agencies that submitted applications for CDBG funding. Exhibits: Attachment A - Attachment B - Attachment C - Attachment D - Attachment E - Attachment F - Executive Summary of the Consolidated Plan Engineering Five-Year Improvement Plan for CDBG Target Areas Summary Comparison of funding for FY 1994-95 and FY 1995-96 Summary of Public Service Applications Public Service Evaluation Checklist Consolidated Plan Full Text (provided to Council Members under separate cover) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSOLIDATED PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PURPOSE FOR A CONSOLIDATED PLAN Title I of the National Affordable Housing Act established the requirement that State and local governments which apply for direct assistance under certain Federal programs must have a housing strategy which has been approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Revised regulations for 1995 consolidate the planning and application requirements of four Federal formula grant programs into one single submission, they are: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). This consolidated submission replaces the previous Consolidated Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) and Final Statement applications. The Five-Year Consolidated Plan, for FY 1995 to 1999, is based on the last CHAS submittal, which covered the period from 1994-1998. Both the Consolidated Plan and the CHAS are five- year planning documents which: 1) identify housing needs and problems; 2) analyze market conditions and resources; 3) set priorities and adopt strategies for addressing the identified needs; 4) allocate resources; and 5) contain an annual plan which identifies federal funds expected to be used, indicate the activities on which they will be spent and set goals for the number and type of households to be assisted by the applicable federally-funded programs. Additionally, the Consolidated Plan will include a plan for use of non-housing funds under the CDBG program. PROCESS TO DEVELOP PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the designated lead agency in the development of this plan. The process involved in developing the Consolidated Plan required the involvement of various City departments as well as contact with various State, County, and Social Service agencies, including the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County, as a means to acquire data and assess community needs. The City of Rancho Cucarnonga was involved in a cooperative effort with the cities of Ontario and Upland to obtain information concerning available services and facilities in the immediate regional area. In addition, City staff conducted combined written and phone surveys of local homeless and special needs providers. A list of those agencies contacted or interviewed regarding housing needs of children, elderly, frail elderly, disabled, persons with HIV/AIDS, and the homeless is provided in Appendix B. Census data used for preparation of the document was obtained either from HUD directly or from the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) Statistical Data Office. Information obtained from SCAG included such items as Census Block Group Maps and the distribution of minority residents. Information concerning incidence of lead-based paint was obtained from the California Childrens Services (CCS) program of the San Bernardino County Health Department and from the State Child Health Development Program. SUMMARY OF NEEDS COMMUNITY PROFILE Income 21.3 percent of all households have incomes below 80 percent of the area median. Based on tenancy, 37.7 percent of all renter households have incomes below 80 percent of the median; whereas, 15 percent of owner households have incomes below 80 percent. In evaluating poverty status, it is found that in all age categories, a greater proportion of those below poverty level are female, with the largest proportion, 11.1 percent for women 65 years and older. Family Type 78 percent of all elderly renter households have incomes below 80 percent of the area median with 56 percent having incomes below 50 percent of the median and 35 percent with incomes below 30 percent of the median. Elderly homeowners are similarly in need with 53 percent having incomes below 80 percent of the median, 28 percent with incomes below 50 percent, and 10 percent with incomes below 30 percent of the median. 46 percent of large renter households have incomes below 80 percent of the median, with the largest proportion, 29 percent, falling in the moderate income category and 17 percent with incomes below 50 percent Cost Burden/Severe Cost Burden 43.3 percent of all renters experience housing cost burden as do 37 percent of all owner households. 18.7 percent of all renter households experience severe cost burden, whereas 10.3 percent of owners experience severe cost burden. Elderly households are disproportionately represented with 74.7 percent experiencing cost burden and 45.8 percent having severe cost burden. Based on Table 6, a majority of all renter households within each family category with incomes below 80 percent of the median experience cost burden. A majority with incomes below 50 percent of the median experience severe cost burden. Based on Table 6, a majority of all owner-occupied households with incomes below 50 percent of the median experience severe cost burden. Overcrowding 10.1 percent of all renter households and 3.0 percent of all owner households are overcrowded. Large renter occupied households are disproportionately represented with 77.1 percent of extremely low, 60.0 percent of low, and 35.6 percent of moderate income households overcrowded. / Substandard Condition 1,063 low/moderate income renter units, 11.2 percent of total units, are estimated to be substandard with 882 units suitable for rehabilitation. 987 low/moderate owner occupied units, 4 percent of the total units, are estimated to be substandard with 8 19 units suitable for rehabilitation. Housing Problem A majority of all low/moderate income households experience some type of housing problem. Minority Representation A large proportion of Black, low income households, 61.8 percent, are small families compared to 45.4 percent of all low income households. Of renter-occupied, low income, Hispanic households, 29.8 percent are large, compared to 12 percent of all low income renter households. Minority households also experience greater incidence of housing problems with 59.1 percent of minority renter households experiencing problems compared to 49 percent for the City as a whole, and 48.9 percent of minority owner households are compared to 39 percent for the City as a whole. Extremely low income, Black renter and owner households, in particular, have a significant problem with 100 percent of all households having some problem, while 100 percent of extremely low income Hispanic households having a housing problem. Homeless Surveys have identified between 25 and 156 homeless in the City at any one time. In every case, the majority of those individuals were identified as Hispanic males. However, it is possible that in recent months the numbers have declined due to new vagrancy laws passed by the City prohibiting the solicitation of day labor. Special Needs In evaluating special needs populations, the City has identified the following categories: elderly and frail elderly, disabled, persons with drug and alcohol addictions, persons with ADS or related diseases, female-headed households, large families, and public housing residents. In each case, the nature and extent of the special needs populations have increased in past year and are likely to continue to do so. Lead Paint Hazard 1,746 low/moderate income households are estimated to have incidence of lead-based paint. The Child Health and Disabilities Prevention Program of San Bernardino County, recorded 10 cases of lead poisoning of 10ug/dl in Rancho Cucamonga; nine of those cases were in the 91730 ZIP code area. 3 MARKET AND INVENTORY CONDITIONS HOUSING MARKET SLIMMARY Housing Mix In 1990, 70 percent of the housing stock was owner occupied. Multi-family housing increased from 17 percent of the total housing stock in 1980 to 30 percent in 1990, with the largest increase in housing with five or more units; an increase from 775 units in 1980 to 5,471 in 1990. Vacancy The vacancy rate was identified at 7.5 percent in 1990, up from 4.8 percent in 1980. The vacancy rate was higher, 14.9 percent, for multi-family units with five or more units. This may be because of lag time for absorption of newly constructed units. Bedroom Mix 84 percent of all owner-occupied units have three or more bedrooms, while only twenty- eight percent of rental units have three or more bedrooms. In 1990, 177 rental units and 311 homeowner three bedroom units were identified as being available to extremely low and low income households. Housing Availability There is an inadequate supply of small size (1-2 bedroom) owner units for small owner households. There is a demand for 5,144 units. There is a limited supply of large rental units. In 1990, there was a demand for 1,298 units. Age of Housing Stock 56 percent of the City's housing stock has been built since 1979, with 95 percent built since 1960. Individual older units are scattered throughout the City with a few concentrations in areas designated as low income target areas as well; North Town, Southwest Cucamonga, and Monte Vista Street. Housing Cost · Ownership housing costs have declined significantly in the last five years. While reliable data is difficult to obtain, TRW monthly housing price comparisons indicate a 6 percent price decrease for this period. · Interest rates have declined dramatically, increasing housing affordability and stimulating sales. 4 Rental housing costs have remained flat, or have possibly declined in the last four years. Housing Affordablity A total of 663 renter and 829 owner occupied units were available to extremely low and low income homeowners in 1990. There is an inadequate supply of housing available to extremely low and low income households. There was a demand for 2,371 units affordable to these income levels in 1990. Assisted Housing There are 11 assisted multi-family units, with a total of 906 assisted units available as of February 1995. The Housing Authority of San Bernardino has 16 scattered site public housing units in the City. As of July 1, 1994, there were 195 Section 8 participants in the City. As of July l, 1994 there were 150 residents on the waiting list for public housing and 166 residents on the waiting list for Section 8 housing. There are 46 residents on the City's Home Improvement Waiting list for single family rehabilitation assistance and 27 residents on the mobile home rehabilitation waiting list Target Areas · There are six identified low income target areas in the City. Five areas qualified based on the 1990 Census and the quartile method. The sixth area was qualified based on a special survey. Barriers and Constraints to Housing The majority of significant constraints on the production of affordable housing are because of non-governmental constraints such as the lack of available financing, employment reductions, land costs, and market absorption. Priority Needs Summary Table PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS (hou~eholdl) Renter Owner Small Large Elderly Cost Burden > 30% Cost Burden > 50% Physical Defects Overcrowded Cost Burden · 30% Cost Burden · 50% Physical Defects Overcrowded Cost Burden > 30% Cost Burden · 50% Physical Defects Overcrowded Cost Burden · 30% Cost Burden · 50% Physicll Defects PRIORITY HOMELESS NEEDS Outreac~ Assessment Emergency Shelters Transmonal Shelters Permanent Supportive Hous,ng Permanent Housing PriOrity Need Leval High, Medium. Low. No Such Need 0-30% H H M L H H M H H H M N H H H M 31-50% H H M L H H M H H H M N H H H i i 51-80% H M M L H M M H H M M N H M H M ESTIMATED UNITS 1,377 780 474 138 403 176 166 225 435 282 99 0 2,332 1,628 819 239 Priority Need Level High, Medium, Low, No such need H H m H H M M m L L L L ESTIMATED DOLLARS NEEDED TO ADDRESS 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 2,000.000 2.000.000 2,000,000, 50,000 0 2.000,000 2,000,000 1,225,000 25,000 ESTIMATED DOLLARSNEEDED TO ADDRESS 50,000 50,000 40.000 PRIORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS Senior Centers Youth Centers NeH3hborhood Facilities Child Care Centers Parks and/or Recreation Facilities Health Facilities Parking Facilities Other Public Facilities INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT Solid Waste Disposal Improvements Flood Drain Improvements Water Improvements Street Improvements Sidewalk Improvementl Sewer Improvements Aslastos Removml Other InfflstrucNm Irf~~ I~ PUBUC SERVICE NEED8 Senior Services Has~tCslX~l Servm You~ Serwcss Sul~tance ~ Sledices E,,,l:~,,Jnt Training Cnme Awlms Flit HOusing Couneelin~ Tenant/LaMe Counseling Chik:l Care Sefvces Heslffi Servscss Priority Ned Level HH3h, Medium, Low, No Such Need H L M L M N N M N N L H H L L M M M H M M M M H H M M ESTIMATED DOLLARS NEEDED TO ADDRESS 680,000 1 400,000 1 50,000 0 0 100,000 O 0 1 1,00O,0O0 500,000 1 1 50.000 1 1 50,000 1 1 1 1 70,000 55,000 1 1 PRIORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Other Public Service Needs H ACCESSIBILITY NEEDS Accessibility Needs H HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEEDS Residential Histonc Preservation Needs M Non-Residential Historic Preservation Needs M ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Commercial-Industrial Rehabilitation L Commerciaklndustnal Infrastructure L Other Commercial-Industrial Improvements L Micto-Busine4 L Other Businesses L Technicel Assistance I L Other Economic Development Needs I L OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEED8 Energy ElSciency Improvement= Lead Based Paint/Hazards Code Enforcement PLANNING Pinning Priority Ned Level High, Medium, Low, No Such Need M M TOTAL ESTIMATED DOLLAR~ NEEDED TO ADDRESS: ESTIMATED DOLLARS NEEDED TO ADDRESS 50,000 685,000 30,000 2.500 20,000 20,000 20,000 $23,862,525 DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN AND ANNUAL PLAN The process involved in setting Rancho Cucamonga's priorities for assistance and determining appropriate strategies and programs was based on the following goal statement: To develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons. Additionally, the determination of priorities was based upon evaluation of identified community needs and available resources. The Priority Stmunary Needs Table illustrates the City's priority needs. Areas of need are assigned one of four priority designations, which are defined as follows: High Priority: Activities to address this need will be funded by the City during the coming five-year period. Medium Priority: If funds are available, activities to address this need may be funded during the coming five-year period. Low Priority: The City will not fund activities to address this need during the five- year period. The City will consider certifications of consistency. No Such Need: It has been found that there is no need or the City shows that this need is already substantially addressed. No certifications of consistency will be considered. The following Priority Needs Summary Table provides the priority needs designations as discussed above. Objective Statements Based on analysis of commtmity needs, existing market conditions, available resources, and the prior discussion on priority designation, objectives, and programs were developed in each of four areas; Housing Affordability, Homeless, Other Special Needs, and Non-Housing Community Development Needs. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY OB~C~V~I Conservation of the City's existing single family and multiple family affordable housing stock. Program 1.1 Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing. ~ Resources RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. 10 /57 Five-Year Goals One-Year Goal Program 1.2 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal OBJF, CTIVE 2 Program 2.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 2.2 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Acquisition of 400 non-restricted units of which 200 will be held for incomes below 50 percent of the area median and 200 will be held for households with incomes below 80 percent of area median. Conservation of 268 restricted units with 134 held for households below 50 percent of the area median and 134 for households for incomes below 80 percent of the area median. Acquisition of 80 new unrestricted units and 54 at-risk units. Acquisition and substantial rehabilitation of existing single family homes. RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. Federal HOME Consortium Funds. Acquire and rehabilitate 286 single family units of which 143 will be held for households below 50 percent of the area median and 143 will be for households below 80 percent of the area median. Acquisition and substantial rehabilitation of 57 single family units. Inlprove access to affordable housing for all low/moderate income households. with emphasis on production of larger 0+ bedroorr0 rental traits. New construction of affordable multi-family units. RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. Construct 400 new multi-family units of which 200 will be held for incomes below 50 percent of the area median and 200 will be held for households with incomes below 80 percent of the area median. Construction of 80 new units. Construction of single family infill development in low/moderate income neighborhoods. RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. Construct 200 new single family units of which 100 will be for households with incomes below 50 percent of the area median and 100 for households below 80 percent of the median. Construction of 40 single family units. 11 OBJECTIVE 3 Program 3,1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 3,2 Resources Five-Year Goal OBJ~.CTIVE 4 Program 4, 1 Resources Five-Year Goal ProVram 4,2 Resources Five-Year Goal OBJECTIVE 5 Provide direct renter assistance to extremely low and low income households in order to obtain or retain permanent housing. Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance. Federal Housing Assistance Funds. Continue to support at least 166 Section 8 applicants and 16 public housing applicants on an annual basis. Same as above. Consider providing direct tenant assistance through participation in the County of San Bernardino's HOME Tenant Based Assistance Program. Federal San Bemardino HOME Consortium Funds. It has not yet been determined that the City will participate in the HOME Consonium. Increase housing opportunities for low and moderate income home ownership. particularly through first-time home bUyer assistance. Develop and administer Mortgage Bond or alternative programs as funds become available at competitive rates. RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. Unspecified as City has yet to determine whether program may be implemented. Consider implementation of a first-time home buyer program through the County's HOME Consortium. Federal HOME Consortium Funds. Unspecified as City has not yet formally joined the Consortlure. Rehabilitation of the City's existing housing stock with enlphasis on owner- occupied housing. Program 5.1 Moderate rehabilitation of the City's existing housing stock with emphasis on owner-occupied housing. 12 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 5.2 Resources Five-Year Goal OBJECTIVE 6 Program 6.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal HOMELESS OBJECTIVE 1 Pwgram 1.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal SPECIAL NEEDS OBJECTIVE 1 Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. The City expects to assist at least 130 low and moderate income households. Assist at least 26 households. Consider implementation of a rental rehabilitation program. Federal HOME Consortium Funds. Unspeci~ed as City is not yet a formal member of the Consortium. Improvement of the living conditions for extremely low and low income households. Continue to support applications of the Housing Authority for their annual Comprehensive Grant to enable improvement in living conditions for public housing residents. Federal HUD Comprehensive Grant Funds. Improvements to 16 public housing units in five years. Complete improvements to the public housing units including lead-based paint removal. Develop a Comprehensive Homeless Assistance Prod, ram to assist homeless individuals. families. and persons with ~pecial needs. and those at-risk of homelessness. Continue the support of local homeless facilities and services. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Assist at least 7,275 individuals. Assist at least 1,455 individuals. To provide necessary rehabilitation services to ~x,'cial needs populations with emphasis on assisting the elderly and frail elderly. 13 Pro~'arn 1.1 Provide minor emergency rehabilitation services to eligible low income households with emphasis on assistance to low and moderate income elderly. Resources Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Five-Year Goal Assist at least 280 households. One-Year Goal Assist at least 56 households. OBJF, CTIVE 2 Provide support, when possible. to service providers assisting special needs populations. Program 2.1 Provide support to special needs services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Resources Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Five-Year Goal None currenfiy identified. NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OB.rF, CTIVF, 1 Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities in order to enhance living enviror~ments and improve the quality of life in low/moderate income neighborhoods and for lower income individuals. seniors. and the handicappod. Program 1.1 Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Resources Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Five-Year Goal Completion of infrastructure improvements in the City's target neighborhoods over the next five years include the following - 9th Street from Grove to Edwin. - Monte Vista Street from Amethyst to Archibald. - Tapia Via from Grove to Ranchefia. - Rancheria from Grove to Tapia Via. - Calle Vejar from Avenida Leon to Hellman and Avenida Leon from Arrow to Calle Vejar. Sidewalk program - installation of sidewalks in existing and potential target neighborhoods. - Sidewalk repair and replacement - removal and replacement of all incidents of inaccessible sidewalk sections throughout the target areas, approximately 19,800 feet. 14 /ce/ One-Year Goal Program 1.2 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 1.3 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 1.4 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal OBJECTIVE 2 Completion of construction and design improvements for 9th Street from Grove to Edwin, Tapia Via design from Grove to Rancheria and approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk improvements. Completion of rehabilitation improvements for the Neighborhood Center, the City's primary senior center, including interior rehabilitation, parking lot expansion, and handicap improvements. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Completion of all rehabilitation improvements. Not funded for FY 1995-96. Development of a Fire Safety Awareness Program for target neighborhoods. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. 100 target area residents participating. Not funded for FY 1995-96. Evaluate the possibility of developing a new community/recreation facility in either the Southwest Cucamonga or North Town target neighborhoods. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. The evaluation and determination of a new community recreation location. Not funded for FY 1995-96. Continue to fund local public and private non-profit service agencies that function to inlprove the quality of life for lower income persons and those with apecial needs. 15 Program 2.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal OBJECTIVE 3 Program 3.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 3.2 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 3.3 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal OBJF. CTIVE 4 Program 4.1 Fund public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including youth-at-risk, fair housing, landlord/tenant counseling, food distribution, and battered women's shelter. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Assist at least 8,575 persons. Assist at least 1,715 persons. Ensure accessability to all public facilities and structures. Provide complete handicap improvements for the Lions Center facility. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Complete all ADA improvements at both the Lions Center East and West. Complete design work for Lions Center West and complete handicap improvements for Lions Center East. Installation of handicap ramps at all curb returns. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. The addition of handicap ramps at all curb returns within the City, or approximately 14,400 square feet of curbing. The installation of approximately 2,880 square feet of handicap ramps. Complete ADA requirements at other eligible public recreation facilities, including Old Town Park. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Complete ADA requirements at Old Town park Not funded in FY 1995-96. The restoration and preservation of properties of social value for historic. archeological. and aesthetic reasons. The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. 16 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal OBJE, CTIVE 5 Program 5.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. RDA 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. The rehabilitation of one historic structure. Not funded for FY 1995-96. Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the City's CDBG Program and provisions of the Consolidated Plan. Continue to fund necessary planning and administrative activities each year. Federal Community Development Block Grant funds Completion of all required program applications, performance reports, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, housing documents, and the like. Completion of all necessary reports and documents including target area assessment and the Consolidated Plan updates. OBJF, CTIVE 6 Program 6.1 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal Program 6.2 Resources Five-Year Goal One-Year Goal To revitalize and upgrade housing conditions. to prevent and eliminate blight and blip, bring influences and to eliminate conditions detrimental to the health. safety. and public welfare. Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. ' Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Provide improvements to 10 households. Assist at least two households. These accomplishments will fall under the goals stated under Housing Affordability Objective 6. Continue to fund a Graffiti Removal Program in target neighborhoods. Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Removal of approximately 74,995 square feet of graffiti. Removal of approximately 14,999 square feet of graffiti. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 2-1-95 Lan'y J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Mike Olivier, St. Civil Engineer ~ Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer / Curt Billings, Engineering Tech. CDBG S vr. BUDGF. T pROPOSAl. (revised 1-31-95~ Subsequent to our meeting with you on January 5th, 1995, listed below is a revised 5 year plan for CDBG street projects, recommended by Engineerrag. The improvements needed are for the installation of new street pavement or a rehab of the existing surface when possible, curb, gutter, sidewalks on one or both sides, ramps for the disabled, street trees, and street lights. An annual Sidewalk Program is recommended beginning 97/98 for the installation of sidewalks where needed in all CDBG target areas. Input from affected residents will be requested to determine when one or both street sides will get sidewalks. This program will continue until all areas are completed. ACTIVITY COST ESTIMATE F.Y. PROJECT 95/96 9th St. from Grove to Edwin St 95/96 Tapia Via from Grove Ave. to Ranchcna Dr. 95/96 GraffiU Removal 95/96 Ramps for Disabled 95/96 SAV Grinding 96/97 %/97 96/97 96/97 %t97 96/97 97/98 97/98 97/98 97/98 97/98 97/98 97/98 98~99 9~/99 98/99 Tapia Via from Grove Ave. to Rancheria Dr. Monte Vista SL from Amethyst St to Archibald Ave. Ranchena Dr. fi'om Grove Ave. to Tapta Via Graftill Removal Ramps for Disabled S/W Gnnding Monte Vi~a St from Amcthy~ St m Archibald Ave. Ranchena Dr. from Gave Ave. m T~ia Via C~Ic Vejg ~m Av~ia L~ m Hel~ Ave. ud Av~ia L~n ~m ~w H~. m C~le Vejg Sid~ ~ G~U ~ov~ ~ps for Di~l~ S~ Gnndmg Calle VeJar from Aventd~ Leon to Hellman Ave. and Aventd~ Leon ~m ~w H~. to C~le Vejg Sid~ ~ Sidew~k ~ Consu'uction $26~,000 Design $30.000 Mamter~nce $22,839 Malntcnmace $20.009 Maintenance S22,509 F.Y. 9t~96 Total: fk359357 Cons'truction $175,000 Design $22,000 Design $31,000 Mmntenance $25, | 23 Mmntcnance $22.0 ! 0 Mmntcnance $24,760 F.Y. 96/9'1 Teal: $'299,893 ComcUon $60,000 ConstrucUon $150,000 Design $33,000 Design $30,000 Malntemace $27,635 Maintenance $24,21 ! Maintenance $27,236 F.Y- 9?/98 Teat: $3S2,082 Consauction $23 ! ,000 Design $30,0O0 Construcuon $50.000 / e_5 98/99 Graffiti Removal 98/99 ,Ramps for Disabled 98/99 S/W Grinding 99/00 Sidewalk Program 99/00 Sidewaik Program 99/00 Gra~ti Removal 99/00 Ramps for Disabled 99/00 S/W Grinding Maintenance Maintenance Malntcnancc F.Y. 9&~9 Total: Construction Maintenance F.Y. 99100 Five y~r total: S30,399 $26.632 $29,959 S39'7,990 $30,000 S275,000 $33,439 S29,295 $32,955 S400,689 S1,810,011 cc: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 1995-96 REVIEW OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC SERVICE PROPOSALS 1 Fair Housin~: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: 2 Landlord/Tenant: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: The City is required under CDBG regulations to provide this activity. Includes public education, mediation, counseling, and legal referral services. Inland Mediation Board $11,978 Percent Applicant's Budget: 9% Percent Increase: 6% 570.201(e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod This agency has received CDBG funds from the City for the past 7 years. The agency is generally very responsive to the needs of the community and has served as an area advocate in the field of fair housing and in many other areas related to housing. The agency provides accurate and timely progress reports. Provides landlord/tenant dispute mediation and resolution services. Inland Mediation Board $9,078 Percent Applicant Budget: 9% Percent Increase: 6% 570.201 (e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod. IMB has received funding for landlord/tenant counseling services for the past 7 years. Through area workshops, seminars, and educational opportunities, IMB provides information and mediation services to area randlords and tenants with regard to rights and responsibilities. 3 House of Ruth: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibili.ty: National Objective: Past Performance: Provides shelter, programs, counseling, and education for banered women and their children who are at risk of homelessness. Services include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, a transitional shelter, outreach offices, legal and social advocacy, as well as community education and violence prevention. House of Ruth $17,400 Percent Applicant's Budget: 2% Percent Increase: 129% 570.201(e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)A Limited Clientele: Presumed Benefit House of Ruth has received CDBG funds since FY 92-93($4,561). This agency has one of the few domestic violence shelters operating in this entire region. Agency staff and volunteers are dedicated to their programs. The agency exhibits superior organizational, financial, and administrative capacities. 4 Homeless Outreach Education and Programs: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Outreach Center that provides referral and other services to homeless individuals and families, including shelter vouchers or referrals, bus tokens, drug and alcohol education, clothing personal grooming, identification acquisition, etc. Services will also include a children's enrichment center which, in collaboration with local school districts, provides educational activities for homeless children. Homeless Outreach Education and Programs $12,000 Percent Applicant's Budget: 12.8% Percent Increase: 50% 570.201 (e) Public Service 570. 208(a)(2)(i)A Limited Clientele: Presumed Benefit HOPE has received CDBG funds from the City since FY 92-93. This agency has undergone some internal organizational shifts in the past several years which resulted in some problems with regard to administrative and financial reporting requirements, as well as a reduction in the number of individuals served. As a result, the agency's funds were reduced in FY 94-95. However, the agency has remanded the problems of prior year and, in fact for FY 95-96, will be adding a children's enrichment center to their program. 5 West End Hunger Program-SOVA: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Food distribution program for low-income families. Provides residents with a five-day supply of food (15 meals) for all members of a household. In addition, advocacy and referral services are provided. Pomona Valley Council of Churches $10,800 Percent Applicant's Budget: 8% Percent Increase: 54% 570.201 (e) 'Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i) B Lim.--'2. d Clientele: 51% low/rood This agency has received CDBG funds since FY 93-94. SOVA is an excellent organization to work with. They were prompt, efficient, informed and very dedicated to this project. This program is able to function largely because of the large number of very willing volunteers. Because of the high demand, funds allocated to this agency have been completely used before the end of the program year. 6 YWCA Y-Teen and Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: YW-Pact Pro~,rams: The Y-teen program provides junior high school age girls a weekly after school club-type environment which addresses many risk and health-threatening behaviors. The YW-Pact (Peer Approach Counseling by Teens) is a program to empower teen parents who in turn share this information with other kids. YWCA $18, 100 Percent Appl icant's Budget: 60% Percent Increase: 159% 570.201(e) Public Service -2- National Objective: Past Performance: 570.208(a)(2)(i)B LimitedClientele: 51% low/mod. Fiscal year 1994-95 was the first year this agency was funded. The YWCA has set up a Y-teen program at the Cucamonga Middle School and has begun the prototype YW-Pact program at the three high school campuses in the City. Reporting is generally efficient and informative. 7 Foothill Family Shelter: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Provision of 90-day transitional shelter facilities as well as comprehensive support facilities designed to enable families to maintain permanent housing situations. Foothill Family Shelter $12,000 Percent Applicant's Budget: 10% Percent Increase: N/A 570.201(e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod. This agency has not previously received CDBG funds from Rancho Cucamonga, however, they do receive CDBG funds from area Cities. FFS has operated in this area for some time under the name St. Marks Shelter and have just recently changed their name. 8 Superfit Sports Club: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Utilize organized structured sports leagues to draw at-risk youth into the program and then utilize the "Smart Moves" program to help educate kids regarding healthy alternatives. Boys and Girls Club $10,000 Percent Applicant's Budget: 2.7% Percent Increase: N/A 570.201 (e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod. This agency has not previously received CDBG funds from Rancho Cucamonga. However, this agency has received funds from other area cities. 9 Juvenile Diversion: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Provide a 16-week intensive counseling program for identified at-risk youth with substance abuse problems, works to empower the youth and his/her family, to make health choices to live drug- and crime-free lives. Counseling Associates $15,000 Percent Applicant's BudSlet: 2% Percent Increase: N/A 570.201(e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod. This agency has not previously received funds from Rancho Cucamonga. However, this agency has received CDBG funds from other area jurisdictions. -3- 10 Camp Fire Boys and Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibili.ty: National Objective: Past Performance: Girls: To provide a 4-day resident camp experience, at Camp Nawakwa, for up to 40 boys and girls, ages 8 to 12, from low- to moderate-income homes. Camp Fire Boys and Girls $8,900 Percent Applicant's Budget: Overall 3%, Project 49% 570.201 (e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B LimitedClientele: 51% low/mod. This agency has not previously received funds from Rancho Cucamonga. However, they have received CDBG funds from other area cities. 11 Mediation Center: Agency Provider: Amount Requested: Eligibility: National Objective: Past Performance: Provide alternative dispute resolution services to assist cottrts with their caseload and to provide an alternative to the general public to resolve conflicts confidentially, as opposed to publicly. Mediation Center $30,000 Percent Al>plicant's Budget: 100% Percent Increase: N/A 570.201 (e) Public Service 570.208(a)(2)(i)B Limited Clientele: 51% low/mod. This is a new agency. Staff does not have information concerning performance. /7/ .~alua3 uo!3E!pai~ ~ 5.(08 a.q.:! dine3 =" UO!SJaAI. O al!uaAnr _ ,% qnD sV.m'_'J '~' s.AoE _~ % % ,nllaqS .(l!ms..! ~!qlo0.4 ,q · -. u. lJ.,,H Ja~unH YAOS ~ % ""',k '% q3uJlnO ssalau,toH _N % ,% qm![Jo moll ~ pa]A[ Iulua/./PJolPul'l ~ % %, % % ZupnoH J!e,,! _ % % % % p,, S",JI3N3DV Jalua;:) uo!l~pal~ s!J!5 ~' ~off e J!4 dw~) UO.tSJaA!(] al!uaAn_r qnl:) q.,qD ~ s,(oll JallaqS ,(l!me...! II!qloo~ uat-A u~.ld JaXunH VAOS q3e~rmO mlamoH qln~! jo amaoH Pa;4i lumaa././PJolPuw"[ luFnoll J!e,..I "e--z." PAGES '174 - 176 ARE BLANK PAGES RESOLUTION NO. q,~- C:::)(,~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN INCLUDING THE FINAL SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-95, AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION PLAN. A. Recitals. (i) On October 19, 1994, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to obtain input from the public concerning the housing and non-housing community development needs of the community as they relate to the Consolidated Plan. (ii) On November 2, 1994, the notice of availability of CDBG funds for eligible projects was published and notices were mailed. (iii) City staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various organizations, as well as from departments within the City. (iv) At the meeting of May 3, 1995, following an advertized 30-day review period, the Council reviewed the Consolidated Plan, Amendments to the Citizens' Participation plan, as well as the annual Community Development Block Grant allocations and heard public testimony. The meeting was continued to May 17, 1995 for final action. (v) On May 17, 1995, the City Council took final action and approved this resolution. (V) All legal prerequisites pdor to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Adopt the Comprehensive Plan, including the Five-Year Strategy, as the accepted five-year plan to guide housing and community development improvement decisions in conjunction with the City's CDBG program, and approve the 1995-96 Annual Plan as the implementation plan to guide funding decisions dudng the 1995-96 program year. 2. Select the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's 1995-96 Community Development Block Grant award: 177 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CDBG DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 3, 1995 Page 2 ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9th Street Design/Const. Wheelchair Ramps Sidewalk Repair Tapia Via Drive Design Lions Center West Lions Center East HOMF IMPROVFMFNT Home Improvement Oldtimers' Foundation PUBLIC SERVICES Graffiti Removal Fair Housing Landlord Tenant House of Ruth Homeless Outreach West End Hunger-SOVA YWCA Boys and Gids' Club Foothill Family Shelter ESTIMATED fY 1995-96 FY198566 fY 1994-95 NEW TOTAL REPROGRAM ALLOCATION AMCXJNT 0 128,400 128,400 590 264,000 264,590 0 20,260 20,260 0 22,760 22,760 0 25,500 * 25,500 204,470 228,520 432,990 0 35.350 35.350 205,060 596,390 801,450 20,000 * 247,804 267,804 0 8.000 8.000 20,000 255,804 275,804 0 23,010 23,010 0 11,300 11,300 0 8,570 8,570 0 7,600 7,600 430 7,570 8,000 0 7,000 7,000 0 7,000 7,000 0 6,000 6,000 0 3,000 ._3.QO0 430 + 81,050 = 81,480 * Includes Program Income 3. Allow the disbursement of program income to allow $28,051 in funds, reimbursed from the sale of the Ledig house, to be allocated toward Home Improvement; $7,745 from prior years deferred loan payments to be utilized for Home Improvement; and $9,593 reimbursed from the construction of the 9th Street watedine to be allocated toward the design of Tapia Via. CiTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CDBG CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 1995-96 May 17, 1995 Page 3 4. Determine the proposed projects that are the most environmentally desirable and that adequate mitigation has been included in each to avoid significant environmental impacts under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). 5. Authorize the City Manager to sign the application for the City's 1995-96 program year Community Development Block Grant application, to submit the Consolidated Plan, and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and to provide such additional information as may be required. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GFNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 02A - 1994 HOUSING FI FMI::NT UPDATt= - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Government Code, a revision and update of the City's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units at-risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council, by adoption of Resolution 95-03, recommends adoption of the attached resolution to revise and update the Housing Element of the General Plan and issuance of a Negative Declaration. BACKGROUND: The subject document is a required technical update mandated by the State every five years. The Housing Element was originally approved in April 1981, updated July 1984, and last updated April 1991. It is a policy document and does not change the residential land use designations in the General Plan. The update is present in three parts: Part I, Summary, and Part II, Programs, are incorporated into the General Plan; Part III, the Technical Appendix, provides supporting data and analysis. All sections of the Housing Element are mandated by State law. Key sections estimate future jobs, housing, and population at build out. One section analyzes the availability of vacant land sufficient to provide housing for all income groups who work in the City. Two sections analyze constraints on housing: one discusses public constraints and another discusses private sector constraints. Two sections required by State law since the 1989 update of the Housing Element address affordable housing: one is an analysis of restricted affordable units which are at-risk of conversion to market rate and the other is the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Production Plan adopted November 16, 1994. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE May 17, 1995 Page 2 The Planning Commission held public hearings on the draft Housing Element on December 28, 1994, and on January 11, 1995 and recommended approval on January 11, 1995. (See Exhibit's "A," "B," "C," "D," and "E"). The draft Housing element was then forwarded to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The State Department of Housing and Community Development reviewed the document and requested some clarifications and minor revisions. (See Exhibit "F"). The minor revisions requested by HCD have been incorporated into the Housing element and Technical Appendix as indicated in the Draft Response to HCD's comments of March 10, 1995. (See Exhibit "G"). CORRESPONDENCF: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in an eighth page advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. ACTION: If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff, it would be appropriate to approve the Housing Element revision for inclusion in the General Plan by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and to direct staff to forward the approved 1994 Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development together with the Draft Response to the State Department of Housing and Community Development's comments of March 10, 1995. R ett e' , City Planner BB:MB/mlg Attachments: Draft 1994 Housing Element Update and Technical Appendix (under separate cover) Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 28, 1994 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 11, 1995 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Minutes dated December 28, 1994 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 11, 1995 Exhibit "E" - Resolution of the Planning Commission 95-03, January 11, 1995 Exhibit "F" - Letter from Housing and Community Development dated March 10, 1995 Exhibit "G" - Draft Response to Housing and Community Development Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 28, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAl, AS SES S~.~ AND GENI::.RA I. PI .AN AMENDMF, NT 94- 02A - 1994 HOUSING EI,EME, NT UPDATF. - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the Caiifornia Government Code, a revision and update of the City's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: In order to give ample opportunity for public comment, staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of January 11, 1995. BACKGROUND: Attached is the 1994-1999 Housing Element update and supporting Technical Appendix. Although the State legislature extended the due date of the 1994 update by two years, the State Department of Housing and Community Developmere (HCD) notified the City that the 1989 update was out of compliance until the State-mandated analysis of restricted affordable units at risk. of conversion to market rate was completed and amended into the City's Housing Element. The 1994-1999 Housing Element update is supported by a Technical Appendix which contains 11 sections. All sections of the Technical Appendix contain content and analysis required by the Housing Element State law. The Technical Appendix reflects the 1990 Federal Census, as well as other sources through December 30, 1993. The sections of the Technical Appendix are: I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI Introduction Population Characteristics Housing Characteristics Vacant Land Inventory Non-Governmental Constraints Govenunental Consuaints Special Housing Assistance Needs Groups Energy Conservation Opportunities Units at Risk Analysis Redevelopment Agency's Housing Production Plan, adopted November 16, 1994 Evaluation of the 1989 - 1994 Housing Element .,/ PLANNING COMMISSION b ~ AFF REPORT HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE December 28, 1994 Page 2 Sections IX and X reflect State mandates adopted after the 1989-1994 update. Section IX of the Technical Appendix incorporates the Units At Risk Analysis and concludes that conservation of the 268 units at risk of conversion prior to June 30, 1999, is a reasonably obtainable goal. Section X incorporates the Redevelopmerit Agency's State-Mandated Affordable Housing Production Plan (HPP) which was adopted by the Agency on November 16, 1994. The HPP is included in the Technical Appendix, because it presents the City's primary efforts to meet State-mandated affordable housing goals. Section XI evaluates the goal, objectives, policies, and programs presented in the 1989-1994 update of the Housing Element and concludes that only minor changes, for clarification, need to be incorporated into the 1994-1999 update. Br Buller City Planner BB:MB/jfs Attachments: ~ Housing Element and Technical Appendix Updates (under separate cover) l --xtft#rr I. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 11, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENEEAL PI.AN AM~ND~ 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING EI.RMENT UPDATE - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Government Code, a revision and update of the City's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission vote on the attached Resolution Recommending Approval of GPA 94-02A to the City Council, direct staff to forward a copy of the Draft 1994 Housing Element Update, including the Technical Appendix, to the State Department of Housing and Urban Development for the mandated 45-day review period, and respond to the Housing and Community Development Department's comments, and then forward the Draft 1994 Housing Element Update to the City Council. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commissfon's public hearing on the 1994 Housing Element Update was opened on December 28, 1994, and continued to January 11, 1995, to provide further opportunity for public comment. In response to the Commission's previous concern regarding the public notice process, a copy of the notice published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and a list of interested parties who received a copy of the notice are attached. In addition, a display ad was run on January 8, 1995, a copy of which will be provided at the meeting. Regarding the Technical Appendix text, attached are corrected pages V-9 through V-11. A copy of the Resolution recommending approval of the 1994 Housing Element Update is also attached. BB:MB/jfs Attachments: Published Public Notice List of Interested Parties Corrected Pages V-9 through V-11 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San BernardenD 1, JOYCE E. TERRY, do hereby declare that I am a citizen of the United States; I am over the age of eigDhteen years, and not a party to or interested in the a ova-entitled matter. I am the Legal Advertising Clerk of the INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN (Formerly The Daily Report) A newspaper of general circulation, published daily in the City of Ontario, County of San BernardenD, State of Cali- fornia, and which has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San BernardenD, State of California, under the date of August 24, 1951, Case Number 70663; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regu- lar and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: December 7, 1994 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: December 7, 1994 Signature Proof of Publication of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION -F'/LHtetT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOTICE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on December 28, 1994. i at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Council Chamber,' located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730, to consider the following described projects. assessment may be reviewed any time prior to final action. The Planning Commission will be considering the assessment, staff's recommendations, and public input at its meeting of December 28, 1994, prior to making a final determination. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSF, mSSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN' P AMENDMENT 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT U DATE - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580 - 65589.5 of the California Government Code. a revision and update of the City's Housing Element. including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. The 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE is supported by a TECHNICAL APPENDIX of 11 Sections: I - introduction; - Population Characteristics; III - Housing Characteristics: IV - Vacant Land Invento; v - Non-Governmental Constraints;~ VI - Governmental ~f~nstraints; VII - Special Housing Assistance Needs Groupe; VIII - Energy Conservation Opportunitiee; IX - Units-at-Risk Anal sis; X - Redevelopmerit A ency's-Housing Production ~tan, adop November 16. lg94; XI- Evaluation of the 1989-' t Housing Element. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. This matter will be forwarded to he City Council for. finall action and the date of this Public Hearing before the City'. Council will be separately noticed. The environmentall assessment is available for review and/or comment prior to~ the public hearing at the Planning Commission and up to the , public hearing at the City Council. Anyone have concerns or questions or wishing to review ~ or comment on the project and/or Environmental' Assessment on the foregoing items is welcome to contact l the City Planning Division at. (909) 989-_1861 or visit the! officel located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. o he Also anyone objecting to or in favor f t above. may l appear in person at the above-described meeting or may submit their concerns in writing to the City pdor to said meeting. Written comments should be addressed to the Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P. O. Box 807, Rancho Cuclmongm, CA 91729. IF YOU CHALLENGE ANY O~= THE FOREGOING ACTIONS IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISINGI ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISEDI AT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL ACTION'. DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission i Date: December 7, 1994 ~ Pub: Dec. 7, 1994 ADL 8 HOUSING ELEMENT NOTICE LIST BALDY VIEW BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 9227 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 8280 Utica Avenue, Suite 160 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 INLAND EMPIRE WEST ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS 313 E. Foothill Boulevard Upland, CA 91786 Gary Luque LEWIS HOMES 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 James H. Cline, Jr. CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 9641 San Bemardino Road P.O. Box 638 Cucamonga, California 91729-0638 Robert Westdyke CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 697 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 9400 Cherry Avenue, Bldg. A Fontana, CA 92335 Susan Sundell CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 211 West Fifth Street Ontario, CA 91762 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 5959 East Avenue Etiwanda, CA 91739 945-1884 987-1012 946-2617 946-7529 483-7440 357-0241 988-8511 899-2451 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 9340 Base Line Road Alta Loma, CA 91701 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 10601 Church Cucamonga, CA 91730 CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT 8776 Archibald Avenue Cucamonga, CA 91730 Jeff Bloom, Planning Director CITY OF UPLAND 460 N. Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Otto Kroutil, Planning Director CITY OF ONTARIO 303 East "B" Street Ontario, CA 91764 Frank Schuma, Community Development Director CITY OF FONTANA 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontaria, CA 92334 Valetie Pilmer, Planning Dinctor COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 3rd Floor San Bemardino, CA 92415-0180 987-0766 989-8541 987-8942 931-4130 391-2506 350-7640 387-4165 TABLE V-3: FORECLOSURES IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ~ RESIDENTIAl, COMMF. RCIAI, TOTAl, ANNUAL PERCENT CHANGE 1990 174 31 205 1991 270 48 318 55 1992 600 106 706 122 1993 970 171 1,141 62 NOTE: Sollrce: All foreclosures are reported combined, but officials estimate residential are 85 percent of the total. San Bernardino Sun, March 29, 1994. H. INTEREST RATES Interest rates have a direct impact on the affordability of home ownership. As interest rates increase affordability decreases. Interest rates for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage hit a low point of 6.74 percent in October, 1993. The low interest rate plus reduced home prices stimulated home sales. In the first half of 1994 home sales increased, responding to rising interest rates. Buyers, waiting until prices stabilized, concluded purchases, because they believed that further declines in home price would be offset by higher interest rams. By June 1, 1994 interest rates for a 30 year fixed rate loan had increased to 8.5 percent. Housing affordability is affected by income and consumer debt, as well as interest rates. In June 1994, HUD stated that the median family income for San Bernardino County was $42,300. This is an increase of $ 1 0,000 above the June 1989 median income. (See Table V-4.) A first time home buyer is one who has never previously owned a home, or who has not owned a home in the last three years. When the interest rate is 6.75 percent, a first time home buyer at 100 percent of median income, with no installment debt, and with the ability to put up a ten percent down payment, could afford a house priced at $159,567. When the interest rate increases to 8.5 percent, the affordability cap chops to $134,460. When the interest rate increases to 9.5 percent, the affordability cap decreases to $122,949, (See Table V-5.) A first time buyer participation in a ten percent down payment program is required to make impound payments. Impounds include payments on mortgage insurance at one (1) percent of the loan value DECEMBER 1994 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT TECHNICAL APPENDIX PAGE V - 9 t4- t / T tt o and property taxes at a minimum of one percent of total value, as well as fire insurance. Impounds are computed in the affordability calculation for Table V-5. A perspective buyer would be required to deposit approximately a one year advance into the impound account, in addition to the down payment. The monthly payment in Table V-5 is limited to principle and interest. The actual monthly payment for the first time buyer is increased by the required monthly contribution to the impound account. Installment debt decreases the affordable home price. According to Bank of America a typical first time home buyer earning $42,300 has installment debt of about $250 amonth. For example, a home buyer with a $250 a month car payment could afford a house priced at $126,311 at the 8.5 percent rate of interest, or $8,148 less than the buyer with no consumer debt. TABLE V-4: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEDIAN INCOME FOR THE RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO PMSA YEAR INCOME 1989 $32,200 1990 $33,800 1991 $36,000 1992 $36,000 1993 $41,100 1994 $42,300 Per the 1990 Census, the Median Income for San Bemardino County was $37,273. Per the 1990 Census, the Median Income for Rancho Cucumonga was $46,193. NOTE: in 1991, HUD adjustments for the Census began. TABLE V-5: HOUSING AFFORDABILITY: AFFECT OF INTEREST RATES AND CONSUMER DEBT FOR 1994 - RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO MEDIAN INCOME OF $42,300 INTEREST CONSUMER MAXIMUM RATE DFRT HOUSE PRICE MONTHLY PAYMENT PRINCIPI.F & INTEREST 6.75% $250 $149,897 $875 6.75% $0 $157,567 $931 8.50% $250 $126,311 $874 8.50% $0 $134,460 $930 9.50% $250 $115,498 $874 9.50% $0 $122,949 $930 DECEMBER 1994 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT TECHNICAL APPENDIX PAGE V - 10 I. PRICE OF HOUSING Housingprices in the City and surrounding region continue to decline, but reliable data for the City and the region is not available. For example, TRW occasionally publishes "most recent month data." For the month of January, 1989, sales of new and resale of single-family detached and attached homes in the City averaged $170,927. For January, 1994, the average price was $161,356. This small sample indicates a six (6) percent price decrease for the five year period. Figures released by TRW for May 1994 set the median home price at $127,249 indicating a 34 percent price decrease for the same period. Perhaps even more important, home prices for all ZIP codes within the City are still declining. According to Len Purdue and Associates, the overall decline in price for a part of the reporting period, i.e. from 1991 through 1993, avenged nine (9) percent. Figures comparing the median price for new and resale homes on an annual basis for 1989 and 1993 are unavailable. According to the Inland Empire News, the median home price in the County for the two year period ending October 1991, was $142,390. TRW reports month to month sales: for May 1994, the median price reported was $127,249, indicating an 11.9 percent decrease from 1991. It is likely that the decrease in home price in the County between 1989 and 1994 was between ten and twenty percent. Several factors explain the higher avenge price for houses in the City than in the County. Foremost is the perception of high quality of life in the City. For example, Money Magazine, May 1994, ranked the City as the 1 lth safest city in the nation with a population over I00,000. Amenities, including parks, trails, and recreation programs, add to the public perception of high quality of life standards. J. PUBI .IC OPINION Homeowners, who perceive a generally higher quality of life and amenities in the City than in the surrounding urban region and who may have paid more to locate in the City, defend elements which they believe create quality of life. For example, they vigorously promote single-family ownership and have vocally discouraged City sponsored new affordable rental housing projects. Consistent with residents in most of California, the community supports affordable projects which appear to increase property values. For example, they support rehabilitation and replacement of deteriorating buildings. They support assistance for declining neighborhoods. They also support a variety of affordable owner projects, such as small lot developments, single-family attached housing, and first time buyer loan programs. Many homeowners in the City have benefitted from such programs. DECEMBER 1994 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT TECHNICAL APPENDIX PAGE V - 11 Irl t T /t tt /% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting December 28, 1994 Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cutamong· Planning Commission =o order a= 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in =he Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cutamong·, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROT,T, C~kTJ. COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT David Barker, Heinz Lumpp, John Melcher, Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner; Brad Buller, City Planner~ Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney~ Larry Henderson, Principal Planner~ Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer~ Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary ANNOUNCF.~-NTS There were no announcements. APPROVAT. OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Tolstoy, approved 4-0-0-1 with McNiel abstaining, to approve the minutes of November 9, 1994. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Lumpp, approved 3-0-0-2 with Melcher and Tolstoy abstaining, to approve the minutes of December 14, 1994. · · · · · CONSENT CAT,~NDAR ~NVIRON~R. NTAT. ASSeSS)rENT FOR DRV~-TnP~.NT p~VI~W 94-21 - CAT.IFORNIA BOX - A request to develop a 104,390 square foot industrial building on 7 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Sub·re· 10) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Toronto Avenue, north of 7th Street - APNz 209-401-05. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, carried 5-0, to adopt the Consent Calendar. pURT.IC H~-ARINGS B. RNVIRON]~.NTAT. ASSRSS)(R. NT AND G~NR. RAT. pT.Saq A)(R-NDN~-NT 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING ~T.~NT UPDATe- - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Government Code, · revision and update of the City's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. c,xH- rr'c-" eF Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, presented~the staff report. Commissioner Melther questioned which programs would be incorporated into Building and Safety codes.. Ms. Bratt responded they are state energy conservation requirements and Title 24 had been adopted by the Building and Safety Division. Coa~nissioner Lumpp asked if the item was advertised in the legal section of the newspaper and posted throughout the City. Ms. Bratt replied an eighth page ad was placed in the legal section of the newspaper and it was not posted. She said the notice was. sent to various interested parties including the Building Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors, and large developers. Ccmmnissioner Lumpp conm~ented that some notices, such as for Cc~mnunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs, are placed in the Inland Valley section rather than the legal section. He thought that might increase the public input. Ms. Bratt responded that staff had suggested that the matter be continued to the January 11 meeting because it was felt that holding the hearing during the holidays may cut down on participation. Chairman Barker agreed that the matter should be continued to Januaz7 11. He also felt that unless there is a problem or people know about it, the general public does not read the legal notices. He thought this was an important issue and the public should be aware in order to have an opportunity to comment. He said people do not usually care unless there is a problem that affects them directly, and then they complain that matters were hidden in the legal section. He thought it would be better to advertise the matter up front and give the public an opportunity to cmnt. C~m~nissioner Melcher asked if the City did no~ already have a policy and he noted that a large ad had appeared recently for a hearing before the City Council. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, re.s~onded there is no set policy. He cmnted that HUD requires cities to solicit lmb~ic participation when adopting the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) and staff ran a large display ad. He re~trked that no residents and only one service prorider showed up at the City Council meeting for the hearing on the CHAS. He agreed with Chairman Barker that people generally do not care'unless something affects them directly. He felt it is hard for the general public to deal with a policy document, Chairman Barker said he would feel more comfortable if every~hing possible is done to alert the public. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that a display notice could be placed in the paper, but he observed that even with expanded notification and special mailings, the City has received minimal participation in the past. Chairman Barker asked if a trailer program for senior citizens, similar to the one established in RAalto, would fit in this program. Ms. Bratt responded that there As a housing rehabilitation program under CDBG which has been used mostly for mobile h~me repairs. Planning Commission Minutes 2 December 28, 1994 Mr. Henderson stated he had heard that the City of Rialto had actually gotten involved in creating a mobile home park. He said that is not one of the proposed programs. He observed that most of the mobile home repairs under CDBG have been for senior citizens. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Motion= Moved by McNiel, seconded by Luml~p, to continue Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 94-02A to January 11, 1995. Motion carried by the following vote= AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES= NONE ABSENT= NONE BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY - carried DI~CTOR'S R~PORTS C. D~SIGN R~VI~W COMMITT~ APPOINTI4~.NTS Commissioner Lumpp said he would like to continue to serve on the Cum~ittee. Commissioner McNiel stated he would like to participate again. ~mmnissioner Melcher said he would like to be removed from the Co~aittee, as he is not available on Tuesday evenings in the foreseeable future. Commissioner Tolstoy felt Commissioners Lumpp and McNiel should be on the Committee. Chairman Barker appointed Commissioners Lumpp and McNiel with the alternates to be Commissioner Tolstoy, Chairman Barker, and Commissioner Melcher, in that order. pURT.IC COMM~.NTS There were no public cmnts at this time. COMMISSION BUSINleSS Commissioner Melcher stated he would like to reiterate his comment made at the November 9 meeting, that the Co~aission should get together with the new City Council. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated the City Manager had indicated that in January the City Council hopes to set up a schedule for meeting with the Planning Commission. He commented that Planning staff had already me= with the two new Council Members. Chairman Barker stated he had suggested to the Mayor that the Council and Commission get together and look at projects. C~mm~issioner Melther suggested that each C~w_£ssioner Jot down their thoughts on matters to he discussed end forward those notes to Mr. Bullet so that staff could put those thoughts together. He thought it would he helpful for the Commissioners to determine what should he addressed prior to the meeting. Planning Commission Minutes 3 December 28, 199 Chairman Barker agreed the Con~nission should formalize the concerns that need to be addressed. He suggested =hat the Commissioners forward their list of items for discussion to Mr. Buller. Camnissioner Tolstoy felt a meeting with the City Council should include a tour of projects in the City. Chairman Barker agreed and felt visuals could also be used. He thought one of the jobs of the Commission is to educate as well as be educated. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that some outstanding ideas and features have been accomplished in the City, and he thought those should be pointed out to the Council in a graphic way, as well as a written way. He mentioned 360-degree architecture as an example and felt the Commission should show examples of buildings approved before and after that policy was adopted. He also thought examples of what has been accomplished in the way of buffering from conxnercial centers to the surrounding areas should be shown with both good and bad examples. Chairman Barker agreed. Commissioner Melcher suggested using the term "uniform level of design on all exterior elevations' instead of 360-degree architecture. Commissioner McNAel felt the most important thing to find out would be the new Council'l expec~cations of the Planning Camnission. He thought that would clarify matters for both the ~issioners and the Council Members. He felt that if what the Commission has accomplished meets with the Council's approval, there should be no change in the Commislion's approach. Camnissioner Tolstoy camnented that all of the Council Members had publicly said what they thought of the City in glowing terms, but he thought the Commissioners and Council Members should look at examples of development. Commissioner Melcher felt it is also important to let the Council Members know what the Commission expects from the Council. Chairman Barker suggested that the C~xmnissioner's suggestions be discussed at the January 11 meeting. He requested that the Coesnissioners give their thoughts to Brad as quickly as possible. )nJOURN~.NT Motionz Moved by McNlel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adjourn. 7:42 p.m. - The Planning Coesnission adjourned to · workshop at 7:45 p.m. regarding Pre-Application Review 94-03, Pre-Application Review 94-04, and Conditional Use Permit 94-26. The workshop adjourned at 11z30 p.m. and the minutes appear separately. Respectfully sube"itted, Secretary Planning Cosmission Minutes 4 December 28, 1994 Cr~mniseioner Melther requested that Item A be pulled from the Consent Calendar. He expressed opposition to the exterior design for Plan 2. He remarked that he had registered such opposition at the Design Review Committee meeting, at which time he was overruled on a 2-1 vote. He said he was not opposed to the project. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution approving Development Review 94-20. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried PURT.IC H~-ARINGS ~NVIRON~.NTAr. ASSESSMENT AND G~N~R~v. PT.AN ~M~ND~NT 94-02A - 1994 HOUSING ~T.~M~.NT UPDATe. - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.5 of the California Goverrunent Code, a revision and update of the City's Housing Element, including the State-mandated analysis of restricted, affordable unite at risk of conversion to market rate through June 30, 2004. Staff recaumends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from December 28, 1994) Chairman Barker commented that a notice was run in the newspaper on Sunday, January 8 at the request of the Planning C~nission. He noted the public hearing had been opened at the December 28 meeting and was still open. He asked ho~ many people were in the audience regarding the matter. Swing no one, Chairman Barker said the C~m~ission would dispense with a staff report, as one had been presented at the December 28 meeting. He asked if anyone wished to address the Commission regarding the item. No one responded and Chairman Barker then closed the public hearing. C~mmissioner Melther stated he had concluded that absent a new, large, and unexpected source of funds, it is unlikely that the City can actually fulfill the number of units which it is obligated to deliver in the way of affordable housing. Miki BratS, Associate Planner, responded that would be a fair conclusion in the absence of funds or a change in ordinance. Cammissioner Lumpp observed that Policy 1.A references encouraging '...a mix of housing t~rpee, including conventional, m~bAle h~me, and apartments...' and he questioned if the City is promoting mobile homes as a product An the City. Ms. Bratt responded that mobile homes exist in the City and the document is seeking to protect those existing mobile homes. C~m~lssioner Lumpp asked ho~ the City is monitoring affordable housing production in Terra Vista. Ms. Brats replied that periodically the developer reports on how many products have been completed and their affordability at the time they are first offered for sale or rent. C~m~issioner Melcher recalled two kinds of affordable housing products in Tetra Vistas some apartment unite which were built with bond financing and an arrangement whereby the developer earned a density bonus by producing a certain Planning Coswaission Minutes 4 January 11, 1995/~ number of affordable units. He believed the density bonus had been earned a nun~ber of years ago and he questioned if the developer still has an obligation to cont~Lnue to repoz"c to the City. Ms. Brats replied the developer has continued to repor~ to the City as a courtesy so that the City can include the information in its housing element. Commissioner Lumpp asked what agencies the City contacts regarding addressing homeless population needs. Ms. Brats responded that the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program works with and funds some service providere in the area. She said CDBG staff meets with several homeless providers in the area, including the County of San Bernardins. Coemissioner Lumpp cainanted there is a San Bernardins Homeless Shelter program. He said he had been involved with that program in the past. He suggested adding the Police Department as a responsible agency. Larr~ Henderson, Principal Planner, stated City staff consults with the Police Department as a resource to verify information. He remarked that the Police Department does not keep records whereas the homeless providere keep records and conduct annual surveys. Conmnissioner Lumpp asked how the City assists with resolution of landlord/tenant disputes. Mr. Henderson replied the City has a contrac~ with Inland Mediation, a non-profit corporation to provide that service. Commissioner Lumpp suggested that Policy 5,D be expanded to clarify the term "sound quality housing." He referenced Objective 7 requiring energy efficiency in residential developments. He stated that the City currently has ordinances regarding house orientation, etc. He asked if the City has are any other solar requirements or energy efficiency programs. Ms. Brats responded that the Xeriscape Ordinance is in place to reduce water consumption, thereby reducing energy use. She also noted that in multi-family housing the ability to install solar piping is required. Mr. Buller con~ented that the Development Code has a large section identifying energy efficiency as · goal to be achieved with standards. He noted the building industry has c~me up with products to make housing ~ore energy efficient without regards to solar access easements and rights. Commissioner Tolstoy commended Ms, Brats for her work on the Housing Element. Ms. Brats commented that she had incorporated work done by Associate Planners Cindy Norris and Alan War,an. Motionz Moved by McNlel, seconded by Tolstoy, to recoemend issuance of a Negative Declaration and to adop~ the resolution recmnding approval of General Plan Amendment 94-02A. Motion carried by the foll~ing votes AYESt NOESz NONE ABSENT: NONE COMMISSIONERSz BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MXLCHER, TOLSTOY - carried Planning Commission Minutes January 11, 1995/~ RESOLUTION NO. 95-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02A, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF TIll CALIFORNIA GOVERNi~NT CODE, AND HA.KING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TI~HEOF A. Reci=Jls. 1, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 94-02A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application' and as 'the proposed Housing Element Amendment.' 2. On December 28, 1994, and continued to January 11, 199S, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B, R-solution. NO~, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, d~cermt~ed, and resolvedby the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foilowes 1. This Consnission hereby specifically finds ~hat all of the facts se~ forth in the Recitals, Par~ A, of this Resold=ion are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Dec-s~her 28 1994, and January 11, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with lmblic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as_followss a. The proposed revision and smendment of the H~using Element will not have a significant lm~ac~ on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Par~ III and b. The proposed Housing Elemen~ Amendment is in substantial conformance with ~ pz~visione of Article 10.6 of the California Goverrment Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housin~ and Community Developsssnt~ and c. T~eprcqsoeedH~usin~Bleeent is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan as presided through the organization and construction of ~he general Plan into super elseants in which the goal, objectives, and policies contained in these elements are interrelated and dependent upon one another, and as a result of the recent technical update to the General Plan adopted January 4, 1989~ and d. The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the City's overall housing 9oal through the development a~ implementation of the five-year action proqrsm and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, maintenance, and development of housing oppor~unitiee for all economic segments of the coemunity~/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLDTION NO.95-03 GPA 94-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 11, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coanission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fetch in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Camniesion hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. b. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment. c. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial canpliance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Goverreent Code. 4. Based upon the fac~s and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the proJec~ will have a significant effect upon the environment and recanmende adol~cion of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows= a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Enviromnental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines pr~nulgated thereunder$ that said Negative Declaration Ind the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent Judgment of the Planning Commissionl and, further, this ~lselon has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the requirements and regulations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning ~lssion finds as followsz In considering the record Is · whole, the Initial Study sad Negative Declaration for the project, t~re is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse iasJmc~ upoawlldlife resources or the biblest upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Cmission during the public hearing, the Planning Ccmission hereby rebuts the presusi~lon of adverse effec~ as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this C~emission hereby reckamends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 94-02A. 6. ~ Sect'~tlr~ to this C--~£selon shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOL~_iON NO. 95-03 GPA 94-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 11, 1995 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: g. ATTEST: ra~~~ I, Brad Buller, Secretat7 of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc~nonga, do hereby certify =ha= the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C--~wission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 1995, by the follo~ing vote-to-witl AYES: COMMISSIONERS~ BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES= COMMISSIOHERSz NONE ABSENT: COMMISS lONERS s NONE ITATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION ANO HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT !leo TIIIRD STREET. Item 430 P.O BOX 9512~53 SACR.~IE~TO. CA %$252-2053 (916) 31J-3176 FAX ($1l) 327-2S43 PETE WILSON. Governre, March 10, 1995 RECE.IVED MAR I 3 1995 Mr. Jack Lam City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 City ot Rancno Cucamonga ptanning Division Dear Mr. Lam: 1~: Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Draft Housing Element Thank you for submitting Rancho Cucamonga's draft housing element, received for our review on January 24, 1995. As you know, this Department is required to review housing elements and report our findings to the locality pursuant to Government. Code Section 65585(b). Several telephone conversations in March, 1995, with Ms. Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, facilitated our review. letter and Appendix sunmmrize the conclusions of those conversations and our review. This The draft housing element is an effective update of the previous adopted housing element. It includes thorough analyses and programmatic efforts to preserve units at-risk of converting to non-low-income uses, and a housing implementation plan for the City's Redevelopmerit Agency's low- and moderate-income housing fund. However, several revisions are required to bring the element into compliance with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). While the previous element was found to comply (prior to the requirements of Chapter 1451, Statutes of 1989), the element now reflects significant land use changes and is designed to cover the next planning period. As such, the element does not appear to identify sufficient sites with adequate densities to accommodate the Ci=y's Regional Housing Need Assessment for lower-incite households. In addition, recent changes in housing element legislation now requires Rancho Cucamonga to adopt quantified objectives establishing the maximum number of housing units that can be constructed, rehabilitated and conserved, hY ~-come ]eve], over the five-year housing Mr. Jack Lam Page 2 element planning period. We have enclosed materials covering the recent legislative changes concerning this and other requirements. These and other required changes are detailed in the Appendix. We hope our cou,,~tents are helpful to the City and we appreciate the cooperation and assistance of Ms. Bratt. If you have any questions, or if we can assist the City in the revision of its housing element, please contact Moira Monahan, of our staff, at (916) 323-3180. In accordance with requests pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are sending copies of this letter to the persons and organizations listed below. Sincerely, ~DepM~'uty Directo'de~~~~~~r cc: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Jose Rodriguez, California Rural Legal Assistance P. Jerold Walsh, Attorney at Law Karen Warner, Cotton/Beland/Associates David Booh~r, California Housing Council Jonathan Lehrer-Graiwer, Attorney at Law Ana Marie Whitaker, Calif. State University Pomona Joe Carreras, Southern California Association of Governments Kathleen Mikkelson, Deputy Attorney General Bob Cervantes, Governor's Office of Planning and Research Dwight Hanson, California Building Industry Association Kerry Harrington Morrison, CA Association of Realtors Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation Rob Wiener, California Coalition for Rural Housing Susan DeSa-tis, The Planning Center Dara Schur, Western Center on Law and Poverty APPENDIX CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA The following changes would bring Rancho Cucamonga's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change we cite the supporting section of the Government Code. The particular program examples or data sources listed are suggestions for your information only. We recognize that Rancho Cucamonga may choose other means of complying with the law. Housin~ Needs. Resources. and Constraints 1. ~cludethe~caa~sha~ofregionalho~ingneedinaccordance ~ Secaon 65584. The 1989-1994 Regional Housing Need Assessment provided in the element should state that it is intended for use in the new planning period· The City should be aware that the official planning period is from 1996 to 2000, due to the two-year extension authorized by Chapter 695, Statues of 1993. Once the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) issues its new Regional Housing Need Assessment to Rancho Cucamonga, the City will be required to amend its housing element to include those figures, and make any other changes resulting from the official numbers. Include an invemo~ of land s~tab~ for r~idenaal de~pmem, including an ana~s~ of the ~latio~p of wn~g ~ these ~t~ (Secaon 65583(a)(3)). The City has a need for units for 2,375 lower-income households, and has 209 acres of vacant land zoned with densities of 14 units per acre or higher, including 50 acres zoned for 24-30 units per acre. However, the City's zoning performance standards restrict market- rate developments to a mid-range of allowable density· The element should clarify the densities allowed under these standards and evaluate whether they are adequate to encourage and facilitate lower-income development. While the element indicates that the Redevelopment Agency'S Housing production Plan includes goals to of which will be affordab e produce 600 new units, most 1 to lower-income households, this would leave a remaining need of 1,775 units to be accoa~odated through private development of sites at typically approved densities. Therefore, the element should specifically evaluate and describe how the City can accommodate its entire need through projects propose to be assisted with redevelopment funds, other assisted projects, or density bonus projects which can achieve the maximum density, and other market development. Analyze potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing for all income levels, including land use controls and site improvements. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need in accordance with Section 65584 (Section 65583(a)(4D. The element should specifically describe and evaluate required site improvements and land use controls including landscaping, recreational amenities, parking, open space, building setbacks, allowed lot coverage, and building heights to determine whether they pose constraints to the development of housing affordable to lower- and moderate-income households. For example, the element notes that parking requirements are based on the unit type and number of bedrooms, but does not describe how many are required for multifamily and single-family, or other standards such as covered parking or garages spaces. B. ~uantt~ted Objectives Include quantified objectives establishing the maximum number of housing units that can be constructed. rehabilitated, and conserved by income level over a five-year time frame (Section 65583(b)(1 & 2)). The law was amended since your last element and now requires that the quantified objectives establish the maximum number of housing units hY ~ncome category that can be constructed, rehabilitated, and conserved over the five-year planning period. This requirement could be addressed by utilizing a matrix like the one illustrated below: Income Group Very Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate TOTAL New Construction 2 Rehab Conservation These objectives may include private activity as well as city'planneD activity. For example~ the construction objective might include developments which require only City review and approval, as well as units to be developed as a result of the City's housing program. Housing ProGrams Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards that facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, and emergency shelters and transitional housing. Where the inventory of sites, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups of all household income levels pursuant to Section 65584, the program shall provide for sufficient sites with zoning that permits owner- occupied and rental mulnfamily residential use by right, including density and development standards that couM accommodate and facilitate the feasibility of housing for very low- and low-income households (Section 65583(c)(1D. If the expanded land inventory does not demonstrate that available land and existing zoning is sufficient to accommodate the development of housing affordable to lower-income households, the element should include a program to identify sufficient sites with zoning that permits owner-occupied and rental multifamily housing use by right (see Chapter 889, Statues of 1991 memo enclosed). Emergency Shelters/Transitional Housing The element is required to include a program clearly committing the City to identifying sites for the development of emergency shelters. The program should include a specific time frame within the planning period for adoption of the emergency shelter ordinance. The program should also include a description of how the standards adopted will accommodate and facilitate development of emergency shelters and transitional housing. Include programs m 'address, and where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing' (Section 65583(c)(3)). Depending on the revised analysis of development standards and site improvements, the City may need to adopt a program to mitigate any governmental constraints posed by these requirements. Affordability The City should develop a system to monitor new construction in order to complete annual general plan progress reports required by Government Code Section 65400. In calculating affordability, the City should be aware that total housing costs should include utilities, in addition to the basic rent or mortgage payment. In general, to be considered affordable, total housing costs should not exceed 30 percent of income. Density Bonus Program Since the provision of a density bonus is key to assisting development of lower-income housing in Rancho Cucamonga, the City should adopt an aggressive density bonus program as soon as possible, and encourage its use as aggressively as possible. This program should not be delayed until after receiving a project proposal requesting a density bonus. Other Funding Source- We have included information about funding programs that could assist Rancho Cucamonga in its programs to provide housing for a wide range of housing types and household incomes. DRAFT RESPONSE TO HCD COMMENTS DATED MARCH 10, 1995, ON THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT The following actions have been taken and responses have been drafted to reply to the comments forwarded to the City by the State's Department of Housing and Community Development, dated March 10, 1995. The numbering of the following comments conforms to the numbering of items in the "Appendix" section of the HCD letter. A. Housing, Needs. Resources. and Constraints HCD request to clarify RHNA goals. As requested by HCD, Housing Element and Technical Appendix text has been revised and Table II-2 added to clarify the City's 1999 Regional Housing Needs Assessment goals. The following text was added to the Housing Element, p. 3: In the absence of updated RHNA figures and consistent with the region-wide slowdown of new housing construction, SCAG's December 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment is assumed to be extended in entirety to June 30, 1999. Approximately 3, 125 units of housing were added to the City's housing supply from 1989 through 1994. As of June 30, 1994, an additional 6,026 units were in the processing stream with a minimum of tentative tract approval. These units which have been on hold awaiting favorable economic conditions could house approximately 8, 764 persons. Consistent with the assumption that SCAG's RHNA goals extend to the year 2000, the City's goal for housing production between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1999, is 9,568 housing units (Technical Appendix: Table 11-3). The following text change was made to the Technical Appendix, p. II-5. The most recent Regional Housing Needs Assessment was developed by the Southern California Association of Governments in 1988. Because of the regional economy, new housing construction slowed dramatically. New construction in the City achieved only 28 percent of the 1994 RHNA goal. In the absence of RHNA for the year 2000, it is reasonable to assume that the City's housingproduction for the July 1, 1989, through June 30, 1994, reporting period substantially accomplished the 1989-94 goal and that the housing need for the July 1, 1989, through June 30, 1999, equals the total 1988 RHNA goal of 9,567 housing units (see Table 11-3). A total of 3.277 housing units were provided from July 1, 1989, through June 30, 1994. There were 3, 125 units of new construction primarily available to moderate and above income households. Also two units of rehabilitation and 150 units of conserved or acquired housing became available to low and very low income households. The aforementioned housing production is assumed to have substantially addressed the Regional Housing Needs goals for the July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1994 reporting period DRAFT RESPONSE TO HCD COMMENTS PAGE 2 In the absence of updated RHNA ~gures and consistent with the region-wide slowdown of new housing construction, SCAG's December 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment is assumed to be extended in entirety to June 30, 1999. Approximately 3, 125 units of housing were added to the City's housing supply from 1989 through 1994. As of June 30, 1994, an additional 6,026 units were in the processing stream with a minimum of tentative tract approval. Consistent with the assumption that SCAG's RHNA goals extend to the year 2000, as indicated in Table 11-3, the City's goal for housing production between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1999, is 9,568 housing units. TABLE II-3. RHNA 2000 GOALS: RHNA New Conservation and Income Group 2000 Goals Construction Rehabilitation Acquisition Very Low Income 1,117 640 143 334 Low-Income 1,258 781 143 334 Moderate-Income 1,729 1,729 Above Moderate 5,463 5,463 Total 9,567 i8,613 286 668 HCD discussion of vacant land survev. HCD a._ssumed the mid-range for the "H" district was derived on a scale of 0-30, e.g. 15. As calculated in the Technical Appendix the mid-range is 27. Further, density bonus calculations would be based on the maximum of the range. As indicated in Technical Appendix Table IV-l, there are ample sites zoned for 14 and above units per acre. Therefore, no change to the vacant land analysis is needed. The vacant land analysis is discussed further below: Mid-range calculation: top of range minus bottom of stated range equals "range," for example: High Density range is 24-30 units per acre, range is 6; therefore, midpoint is 27 units per acre. Developer chooses density based on market decisions, historically choices have been at 50 to 75 percent of range, but future projects are not restricted (p. IV-3). For qualifying projects, the density bonus is calculated at 100 percent of range plus State- mandated bonus. DRAFT RESPONSE TO HCD COMMENTS PAGE 3 , At 75 percent of range, 4,366 units could be constructed on 187 acres of land zoned for 14 or more units per acre (Table IV- 1 ). · 106 units restricted to low income households were provided in 1994. The redevelopment agency is committed to producing 1,286 units restricted to lower income households for the reporting period (Table X-10). HCD request for further analysis of Development Code Standards. Governmental constraints are discussed in section VI of the Technical Appendix. The only major change since HCD review and certification of the City's Housing Element in 1991 has been to streamline processing as discussed on p. VI-13. That the Development Code is not an impediment to housing production is demonstrated by the 1989 through 1994. production of 3,125 new units and approval of an additional 6,026 units which have not been built because of economic conditions. In the previous five-year period ( 1984 - 1989) 12,259 new units were added to the housing supply under identical development standards, but a more favorable economic climate. The Development Code has not been previously been viewed by HCD as a constraint to housing. Language has been added to the Technical Appendix (p. VI-4) stating when the Code was first adopted and noting subsequent changes. Also, the Tables summarizing the Basic and Optional Standards for residential development have been copied fi'om the Development Code and included as Tables VI-1 and VIo2 ~p. VI-5 to VI-8). The following text changes were made to the Technical Appendix, p. VI-4: Development Standards There have been no significant changes in residential standards since the adoption of the City's Development Code in 1983. Minor changes have brought the City's Code into compliance with changes in State legislation. Also, prior to completion of the 1989 update of the Housing Element, a Hillside Development Ordinance was adopted to codi~ long-standing hillside development polices. The current Basic Development Standards (Development Code Table 17. 08. 040 - B) and Optional Development Standards (Development Code Table 17.08.040- C)are included herein as Table VI-1 and Table VI-2. Overall the City's development standards are based upon acceptable provisions and are not exceptional or unusual and, in fact, are consistent with those of surrounding communities. The provisions allowed under the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans are somewhat less demanding than those contained in the City's Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, but this reflects the unique community character within each of these planning areas. DRAFT RESPONSE TO HCD COMMENTS PAGE 4 B. Quantified Objectives HCD request for quantified objectives. See "Table II-2: RHNA 2000 Goals" above, which has been inserted into the Technical Appendix of the Housing Element. C. Housine Prod, rams 1. Two items HCD request for identification of adequate sites for low income housing,. Adequate sites are identified Section IV of the Technical Appendix as discussed above under HCD Item A.2. HCD requesting an emergency shelter ordinance. The City's Development Code provides adequate sites for emergency shelter. The Technical Appendix has been amended to clarify the existence of adequate sites for emergency shelters. The following text change has been made to the Technical Appendix, p. XI-27: Evaluation: The City's Development Code provides adequate sites for emergency shelter, therefore a specific emergency shelter site ordinance is not needed Under the designation "group home," homeless shelters for up to six persons are permitted as a matter of right in every residential district. Further, with a Conditional Use Permit "group homes "for seven (7) or more persons are permitted in the LM, M, MH, and H residential districts. Also, as discussed under Program 5. C. 2, voucher programs are administered through area non-profit agencies. The vouchers may be used at motels and hotels located within the City. Motels and hotels are conditionally permitted at various locations throughout the City, including the General Commercial zones and many industrial areas. However, location of shelters for battered women and children need a location with an anonymous address. This special need could be addressed in the Development Code. Action: When budget and staff are available, research and evaluate special requirements for location of shelters for abused women and children, specifically the need for an anonymous address. , HCD reference to potential need for "mitigation programs" under HCD Item A.3. As discussed under HCD Item A.3 above, additional programs to address governmental constraints are not needed. D. Other HCD request to monitor new construction. The City currently requests the price range of new construction as part of the City's Environmental Information Form (Part 1 - Initial Study). The City is also installing computer software to track such information. bl t tl / 'l tt l/ DRAFT RESPONSE TO HCD COMMENTS PAGE 5 HCD request to revise the text of the density bonus program item. The Density Bonus Ordinance Program (p. 15) is carried forward from the Housing Element adopted in 1991. The density bonus program as written appears to adequately state the City's intention. The following clarification has been added to the Technical Appendix on p. XIo25: The City's intent is to work withfor-profit and nonprofit developers to provide affordable housing in the City. The City and its Redevelopment Agency are aggressively pursuing the production of affordable housing and have awarded density bonuses to qualified projects and will continue to do so. a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL Of THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02A, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 Of THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDING8 IN SUPPORT THEREOF. a. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 94-02A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application" and as "the proposed Housing Element Amendment." 2. On December 28, 1994, and continued to January 11, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and on January 11, 1995 recommended adoption of the proposed Housing Element Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. 3. On May 17, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on May 17, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed revision and amendment Of the Housing Element will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II; and b. The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial conformance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and c. The proposed Housing Element is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan as provided through the organization and construction of the General Plan into super elements in which the goal, objectives, and policies contained in these elements are interrelated and dependent upon one another, and as a result of the recent technical update to the General Plan adopted January 4, 1989; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 94-02A- 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE May 17, 1995 Page 2 d. The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the City's overall housing goal through the development and implementation of the five-year action program and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, maintenance, and development of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. b. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment. c. That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial compliance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the i...nformation contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the requirements and regulations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will OCCUr. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, the City Council of The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby recommends approval on the 17th day of May 1995, of General Plan Amendment No. 94-02A. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON CHURCH STREET FROM PEPPER STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE; A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON MORNING PLACE AND VINTAGE DRIVE FROM BANYAN STREET TO MILLIKEN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be mended to provide for a speed limit of 40 MPH on Church Street from Pepper Street to Archibald Avenue and a speed limit of 35 MPH on Morning Place and Vintage Drive from Banyan Street to Milliken Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Section 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code allows cities to set speed limits in accordance with specific Engineering Surveys in order to more precisely establish the "Reasonable and Prudent" speed requirements under basic state speed law. This speed then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than five years old, is particularly important where radar is used for enforcement. Recent court decisions have rendered arbitrarily-set speed limits invalid when enforcement is by radar. - Requests for enforcement of speeds have been received from residents of the above mentioned streets. Church Street is now posted for 25 MPH, a condition which no longer permits effective enforcement because the posted limit deviates so much from predominant driver behavior. California speed law is based on the legislatures belief that the majority of drivers respond in a safe and reasonable manner to conditions around them. This is why prevailing speeds are such an important factor in determining a reasonable speed limit. Morning Place - Vintage Drive is now unposted for a speed limit from Banyan Street to Milliken Avenue. Now that development along the street is complete, a valid survey is possible and is needed to establish an enforceable limit. In both cases, the street widths and their function as collector streets disallow the posting of a 25-MPH zone, even though they serve residential areas. Police personnel have confirmed the need for survey - backed speed limits to enable use of radar, the only effective means of enforcement in our heavily developed city. A survey as required by the Vehicle Code has been conducted on each of these streets. The survey involved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by using radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of these surveys are summarized in the attached table. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESTABLISH SPEED LIMIT May 17, 1995 Page 2 After review of these results, it was found the safety record of the streets is well within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not apparent to drivers. Between Pepper Street and Archibald Avenue on Church Street prevailing speeds are as follows: Majority traffic speed 40 to 44 MPH 851h Percentile speed of 46 MPH On Morning Place - Vintage Drive between Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue prevailing speeds are as follows: Majority traffic speed 26 to 36 MPH 851h Percentile speed of 36 MPH These streets have conditions readily apparent to drivers, thus, the observed 85th percentlie speed must be the predominant consideration in determining the speed limit. CONCLUSION A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on the street and still provide for effective enforcement. A speed limit such as this is set at, in most cases, the tint 5 MPH increment below the speed below which 85% of the drivers are going. If accident rates are higher than expected, a further 5 MPH reduction from the 85% level accompanied with a higher level of enforcement may reduce the accident rate to within expected levels and may be supported in court. The proposed speed limit on Church Street is currently exceeded by 50% of the drivers observed: however, the limit should provide an effective tool for law enforcement due to the circumstances under which it will be in force. The proposed speed limit on Morning Place - Vintage Drive is currently exceeded by 16% of drivers observed, making the limit ideal and highly enforceable. Respec/t/t/f~s, ubmitted, , . Willi 'am~ City Engineer WJO:PAR:Iy Attachment . L // Z CITY OF RANC;-~O CUC;qMONGA SP~ED DATA REDUCTION PROGRAM E & W ON CHURC~ ARCHIBALD - H~LLMAN DAT~ OF SURVEY - THURSDAY 4/~7/'~5 DEVELOPM~J~4T POST~'D SPEED LIMIT OBSERVED RES T I PiE 4: 50 - 5: 5(> N. P, STREET WIDTH 4--' ~8 58 48 58 68 T,--affic Er, glr, eer' Date CITY OF RANCH0 CUCA~IONGA S~EET DirECTION : --~ -. i LOCATION :A&-C' - ~"'~-r^"~ DATE REMARKS : ~OSTED SPEED : 85%-iLE : ~VG S;'EED : ~-5' 7-7 SUPVET 87 .'~e 7O E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPEED DATA REDUCTION PROGRAM & W ON VINTAGE MILL!~CEN - MORNING CT DATE OF SURVEY - WEDNESDAY 4/I9/95 DEVELOPMENT POSTED SPEED LIMIT RES TIME 2:50 - 3:45 N.P. STREET WIDTH 44' '~ ~-: ~,,, _' :-' 2 F _: ;:'E/Z '_' S IO NPH PACE SPEED :5 rO -j- .-25T"~ ::',-::~CL-':N~Z'-Z S;:'~ED '-6 27 TO ~6 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED 80.39 STANDARD DEVIATION ~. 88 PER- CNTS I O0 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 25 aO 15 I 0 5. ~5 $5 ~5 55 65 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPEED DATA REDUCTION PRSGRAM N & S ON MORNING ST BANYAN - VINTAGE DATE OF SURVEY'- WEDNESDAY 4/°19>'95 DEVELOPMENT POSTED SPEED LIMIT RES TIME 3:0C~ - 5:00 N.P. STREST WIDTH 44' '/~HTCL~S OBSERVED i0 niPH PACE SPEED 50 50~H P~R~NTZLE SP~ED ~I ~6 TO 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED 7~.00 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.72 SPEED NUM <MPH) BER PERCT ~0 I 2. O0 21 0 0. O0 12 0 O. O0 23 0 O. O0 ~_4 3 6.00 25 2 4.00 26 2 4.00 27 5 10. O0 ~B 3 6. O0 29 3 6.00 30 4 8.00 31 5 I 0. O0 3~. 4 8. O0 33 I 2.00 34 6 1 ~. O0 35 S 6.00 36 i 2. O0 37 ~ 8.00 38 I 2. O0 39 0 O. O0 40 I ~. O0 41 0 0. O0 4~ 0 O. 00 4~ 0 O. 00 ~4 I 2. O0 45 0 0, O0 ,).6 0 O. O0 47 0 O. O0 48 0 O. O0 49 0 O. O0 50 0 O. O0 51 0 O. O0 5~ 0 O. O0 53 0 O. 00 5.~ 0 O. O0 55 0 O. 00 56 0 O. O0 57 0 O. 00 58 0 O. O0 59 0 O. O0 60 0 O. O0 Traffic ACCUhl PER- PERCT CNTS 2.00 i00 2.00 - ~.00 95 2.00 - 8.00 90 12. Cr0 - 16.00 85 26.00 - 32.00 80 38.00 - 46.00 75 56.00 - 6~.00 70 66.00 - 78.00 65 84.00 - 86.00 ~0 94.00 -- 9~.00 55 96.00 - 98.00 50 98.00 - 98.00 98.00 i00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 100.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 I00.00 ~iO 30 40 50 60 SPEED SURVEY DATA CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STREET : DIRECTION : !' LOCAT I ON · ~ "' ~) DATE : ' ' HOURS :__t,:,__ NAME REMARKS : POSTED SPEED : 85%-ILE : AVG SPEED : 10 MPH PACE : SPEED ~7 ~.J . SURVEY NO. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Paul Rougeau Traffic Engineering Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga Ca. 91729 Dear Mr. Rougeau, This letter is to request that the City post the speed limit on Church St. from Archibald to Hellman at 35 mph. This speed would be appropriate in light of the traffic and engineering survey that was completed on this street combined with prevailing conditions in the area (school, cross streets, pedestrian traffic, driveways, etc.). The speed limit now posted, (25 mph), is urtrealistic and cannot be enforced with RADAR. I am a Motor Officer for the Pomona Police Dept. and have personally monitored on RADAR, cars going 45 to 55 mph on this stretch of roadway. I have spoken to SheniTs Dept. Traffic Officers about this and they are aware of the problem but due to the speed limit not being posted in accordance with the survey it is difficult at best to conduct any meamngful enforcement on this street. They have assured me that, were the limit posted in accordance with the survey, they would enthusiastically enforce the speed laws here. In closing, I would like to commend and thank Mr. Bob Porter of your office for his prompt and very helpful assistance in answering my questions regarding this matter. ORDINANCE NO. 5 4 ~) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set pfima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations conceming prima facie speed limits set forth in Pan B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is mended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the pfima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or pans of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed l .imit (MPH) 1. Archibald Avenue. - Banyan Street to north end 50 2. Archibald Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street 45 3. Arrow Route. o Baker Avenue to Haven Avenue 45 4. Baker Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd 35 5. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue 35 6. Banyan Street - Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue 45 7. Banyan Street from west City Limits to Beryl Street 40 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE May 17, 1995 Page 2 9. 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. Name of Street or Portion Affected Base Line Road. - west City limits to Camelian Street Base Line Road. o Carnelian Street to Hermosa Avenue Base Line Road. - Hermosa Avenue to Spruce Avenue Beryl Street - Banyan Street to end Beryl Street - 800' N/o Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street Canistel Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Antietam Drive Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to end Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street Church Street - Pepper Street to Haven Avenue Church Street o Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue East Avenue - Base Line Road. to Highland Avenue 8th Street - Grove Avenue to Haven Avenue Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill Blvd.. to 24th Street Fairmont Drive - Highland Avenue to Milliken Avenue Fairmont Drive - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane Fredricksburg Avenue - Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. Haven Avenue - 4th Street to Hillside Road. Hellman Avenue - Foothill Blvd.. to AIm Loma Drive Hellman Avenue - 500' N/o Manzanita Drive to Valley View Hellman Avenue - 6th Street to Foothill Blvd. Hermosa Avenue - Base Line Road. to Wilson Avenue Hermosa Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Sun Valley Drive Hermosa Avenue - 8th Street to Base Line Road. Highland Avenue - Sapphire Street to Carnelian Street Highland Avenue - Amethyst Street to Hermosa Avenue Highland Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to 800' W/o Haven Avenue Hillside Road. - Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street Hillside Road. - Amethyst Street to Haven Avenue Hillside Road. - Haven Avenue to Canistel Avenue Hillview Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive Kenyon Way - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane Lark Drive - Kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) 45 40 45 45 40 35 45 40 45 45 45 45 35 35 35 40 45 35 40 45 45 40 45 40 35 45 35 40 35 30 35 35 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE May 17, 1995 Page 3 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed I .imit (MPH) 41. Lemon Avenue - Jasper Street to Beryl Street 35 42. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 43. Lemon Avenue - Haven Avenue to Highland Avenue 40 44. Manzanita Drive - Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue 35 45. Moming Place/Vintage Drive - Banyan Street to Milliken Avenue 35 46. Mountain View Drive - Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue 40 47. Netherlands View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive. 30 48. 9th Street - Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue 40 49. Red Hill Country Club Drive - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Cuesta 35 50. Rochester Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40 5 I. San Bernardino Road. - Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 52. Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end 45 53. Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Lemon Avenue 40 54. 7th Street - Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 45 55. Sierra Crest View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 56. Spruce Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road. 40 57. Summit Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 45 58. Terrace View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 59. Terra Vista Parkway - Church Street to Milliken Avenue 40 60. Victoria Street - Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue 35 6 I. Victoria Street: Etiwanda Avenue to Route. 15 40 62. Victoria Street - Haven Avenue to Mendocino PI. 40 63. Victoria Park Lane - Fairmont Way to Base Line Road. 35 64. Victoria Windrows Loop (north &south) 35 65. Vineyard Avenue - Church Street to Base Line Road. 40 66. Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Carnelian Avenue 45 67. Vintage Drive - Milliken Avenue to east end 35 68. Whirtram Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to east City limits 40 69. Wilson Avenue - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue 45 70. Wilson Avenue - Haven Avenue to 200' east of Canistel Avenue 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE May 17, 1995 Page 4 (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fit~een (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Califomia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th Day of May, 1995, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day. of May, 1995. Executed this 17th day of May 1995, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk DATE: TO:. FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager PROPOSED GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES The City Council ad hoc committee has met on this subject and considered the proposed ordinance in view of the comments received from the business community and the goals of enhancing public safety. After discussing this matter at length, the ad hoc committee decided to recommend the attached ordinance. The ordinance as presented would require that all convenience stores h a v e security cameras. Security cameras would have to meet minimum criteria established by the police department to insure their effectiveness. All new stores would be required to have them before they opened and all existing stores would have one year to install them. Of 26 stores surveyed in the City, 10 did not have security cameras. In addition to requiring security cameras, the City would establish recommended guidelines that stores could follow to enhance their safety. These guidelines include the following: Locate any signs posted in the windows so as to provide a clear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area. Locate the sales area so that the clerk and customer are fully visible from the street at the time of the sales transaction. C Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in area, in the window which states that the cash register contains $50.00 or less and that there is a safe in the store and that it is not accessible to the employees. Have no more than $50.00 cash available and readily accessible to employees. Maintain a drop-safe or time release safe which is bolted to the floor or weighs at least 500 pounds. To help publicize these guidelines and other crime prevention information, the City will develop a resource book that will be distributed to all convenience stores. PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE ORD. City Council Meeting May 17, 1995 Page 2 Along with the resource book and the suggested guidelines, the City would also use the existing Sign Ordinance as a tool to seek compliance with the visibility guidelines listed above. The resource book would show stores the right and wrong use of signs and how they can be in compliance with our sign ordinance. Finally, the ad hoc committee felt that the Planning Division should examine our current Development Code standards regarding parking lot lighting to see if they could be adjusted to help enhance public safety. Because this ordinance would place a requirement on new development, namely convenience stores, the City Attorney's Office has stated that this ordinance must first be reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission before it can be adopted by the City Council. With this in mind, it is recommended that the City Council send this proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission for their action. It is also recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare a robbery prevention resource book and that the Planning staff be directed to look at possible adjustments to our lighting standards. With the above actions, the City Council will be working cooperatively with the business community to help achieve our common goal of enhancing public safety. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager /dab ORDINANCE N0. ORAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.28 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES PERTAINING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES WHEREAS, homicides and robberies at Convenience Food Stores between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. may result in the loss of life and/or property and is contrary to the public health and safety and the welfare of the employees and customers of Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, by adhering to certain regulations and guidelines Convenience Food Stores will help establish an environment that will minimize or eliminate a significant number of incidents of homicide and/or robbery; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 1994, a public workshop was conducted to obtain public input; and WHEREAS, on , 1995, the Planning Commission conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on and concluded a duly noticed public amendment to the Municipal Code; and 1995, the City Council conducted hearing concerning the subject WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: SECtION l: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new chapter 9.28, to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chapter 9.28 CONVENIENCF. FOOD STORF-~ Sections: 9.28.010 Definitions. 9.28.020 Regulations. 9.28.010 Definitions. The following terms and phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CONVENIENCE STORE REGULATIONS PAGE 2 ORAFT A. "Convenience Food Store" is a business establishment that: 1. Derives 50 percent or more of its gross income, excluding motor fuels, from the sale of goods, merchandise, or other articles of value in their original containers; and 2. Offers a limited quantity household, and sundry items; and and variety of food, 3. Operates at any time between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m.; and items. , Does not sell or have for sale prescription drug B. "Owner" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other group enterprise having lawful possession of the premises upon which the Convenience Food Store is operated. C. "Employee" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or group enterprise legally responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Convenience Food Store. 9.28,020 Regulations. All Convenience Food Stores shall comply with the following regulations: A. Install a security camera of a type and number approved by the City Manager or his designee. Said camera must be capable of producing a retrievable image on film or tape that can be made a permanent record and that can be enlarged through projection or other means. Cameras meeting the requirements of this section shall b e maintained in proper working order at all times and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City Manager or his designee. Convenience Food Stores open as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance have twelve months from the adoption of this Ordinance to comply with this section. Section 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that a n y one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or o th er portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley DaiLy Bulletin. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. Alexander, Mayor ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE On May 9, 1995, the Route 30 Task Force convened in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. The meeting was attended by nearly all of the committee members as well as City staff, CalTrans and SANBAG representatives. At this meeting the committee wanted to again re-examine the Profile for the proposed Route 30 Freeway focusing on two specific locations, one at Rochester Avenue the other Sapphire Avenue. The CalTrans representative explained the development of the at grade-depressed profile in relation to the two locations. It was the consensus of the committee the project, as proposed, is reasonable for the Rochester location. Focus then switched to the Sapphire Avenue. City staff presented discussion on traffic and public safety concerns. Fire Chief Dennis Michael was present and discussed public safety/fire response time and other significant issues associated with the proposed closure of Sapphire Avenue. There was significant discussion regarding the Profile issue at Sapphire. The committee voted to accept the Profile as proposed by CalTrans, which calls for an at grade or depressed profile throughout the community with the exception of the Sapphire Avenue area. The vote was unanimous. The Task Force requested City staff and CalTrans to provide additional information for the Sapphire area to be considered at the next Task Force meeting. Specifically, the Task Force would like to again review Public safety response times in the area. Four alternative proposals at Sapphire to include: 1) The freeway over Sapphire. 2) The freeway at grade at Sapphire requiring the closure of Sapphire. 3) The freeway at grade at Sapphire requiring Sapphire to go over the freeway, resulting in the acquisition of several homes. 4) A proposed alternative to fully depress the freeway at Sapphire which has significant engineering cost and implications. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE May 17, 1995 Page 2 · The potential for extending Highland Avenue, west to the City of Upland. Describe the appearance of the freeway and walls at the Sapphire area under the different scenarios as presented. At the end of the meeting comments from the public were requested and several members expressed their interest in the Sapphire area. The public was assured the Sapphire area will be reviewed again at the next Task Force meeting. The next meeting of the Task Force is scheduled for June 13 in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. Respectfully submitted, William J. Alexander Mayor WJA:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 17, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council CORRECTED PAGES RE 1994/95 AMENDED REVENUE BUDGET It has come to my attention that there is a typo in the May 17th City Council agenda item D-9 "Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1994/95 Appropriations" as follows: Agenda Submitted Corrected Page * Description Amount Amount 29 01-3900-1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 01-3900-1030 Property Tax - C/Y Unsecured 01-3900-1040 Property Tax - P/Y Sec.& Unsec. Total Taxes $ 1,252,880 $ 1,278,450 $ 99,120 $ 101,140 $ 151,330 $ 154,420 $18,760,580 $18,791,260 32 Total General Fund $ 29,409,460 $ 29,440,140 48 Grand Total All Funds $ 63,094,040 $ 63,124,720 * Attached are the corrected agenda pages. Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this oversight may have caused you. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFI") RFVFNIIF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 t12,592 115,010 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMENDED BUDGETED BUDGETED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1995 GENERAL FUND 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3900 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 (1) TAXES 1020 1030 1940 1060 1065 1075 1080 1100 1110 1185 1190 1800 4550 4551 4552 4553 Property Tax - C/Y secured Property Tax - Crf unsecured Prop Tax - P/Y sec & unsec Property Tax - penalties/interest Supplemental Taxes Unitaqf Tax Utility Users Fee Sales & Use Taxes Prop 172 112 Cent Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Admlseons Tax Property Transfer Tax Franchise Fee - Gas & Electric Franchise Fee - ResidenUal Refuse Franchise Fee - Commercial Refuse Franchise Fee - Cable TV 1,309,370 1,322,080 1,278,450 82,660 83,650 101,140 72,200 73,060 154,420 58,260 58,260 55,000 60,180 60,180 15,000 0 0 100,000 3,150,000 5,600,000 5,600,000 6,953,540 7,505,760 7,775,000 0 148,600 148,600 8,000 96,000 96,000 3,000 0 0 200,000 200,000 250,000 1,260,000 1,205,770 1,250,000 628,400 630,000 825,000 597,500 650,000 700,000 252,000 375.000 442,650 Total Taxes 14,634,610 18,008,360 18,791,260 (2) LICENSES & PERMITS 01-3900 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 2200 Business Licenses 2220 Bicycle Licenses 2290 Building Permits 2300 Other Licenses & Permits 781,530 800,000 800,000 250 250 100 575,000 585,000 700,000 7,000 4,660 7,500 Total Licenses & Permits 1,363,780 1,389,910 1,507,600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FSTIMATFI') RFVFNIIF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 -- 104,887 112,592 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR CODE DESCRIPTION 1993 - 1994 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 o 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 (3) FINES & FORFEITS 01-3901 01-3g01 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 2460 Vehicle Code Fines 139,000 2461 Parking CitaUons 94,950 2472 Vehicle Release Fee 0 2473 CltaUon Proof of CorrecUon Fee 0 3450 General Ordinance Fines 6,000 100,000 90,000 0 0 10,000 190,000 85,100 45,000 100 14,000 Total Fines & Forfeits 229,950 200,000 334,800 (4) MISCELLANEOUS 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 01-3901 4610 Interest Eamings Re RDA Loan 300,000 7910 Sale of Printed MatedHale 51,650 7950 Returned Item Charge 300 8520 Other Revenue 10,000 8523 Recyclable MatedHal 200 300,000 50,000 300 10,000 100 300,000 72,000 300 10,000 0 Total Miscellaneous 362,150 360,400 382,300 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FF:;TIMATFD RFVFNI IF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,881 112,592 115,010 ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION AMENDED BUDGETED BUDGETED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1995 (5) INTERGOVERNMENTAL 01.3900 01-3900 01-3901 5230 5250 5338 Motor Vehicle in LIeu Homeowners Property Tax Relief Off Highway License Fee 4,036,000 3,693,710 3,693,710 19,600 20,000 22,000 2,250 2,250 2,000 Total Interaovernmental 4,057,850 3,715,960 3,717,710 (6) CHARGES FOR SERVICES 01-3901 01.3501 01-3901 01-3501 01-3501 01-3501 01-3501 01-350t 01-3501 01-3901 01-3901 01-3501 1186 1200 2400 3455 7260 7280 7250 7300 7310 7320 7330 7340 Finger Pdnt Fees D.A.R.E. Program Reimbursement Candidates Filing Fees False Alarm Fee Plan Check Fees Planning Fees Engineering Fees Disaster Prep. Special Program Fees Planning Dept. Special Program Fees Community SewIces Special Program Fees DARE Program PromoUona & ContribuUons Building & Safety Special Services Fees Total Char;es for Services 13,000 13,000 13,000 52,830 89,610 89,610 0 3,600 3,600 14,000 2,000 10,000 355,000 350,000 370,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 662,000 4t4,000 480,000 39,160 39,200 34,000 13,000 10,000 3,000 13,060 26,340 14,200 5,820 2,000 5,500 0 10,000 20,000 1,367,870 1,209,750 1,292,910 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FgTIMATFI') RFVFN|IF POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 112,592 115,010 BUDGETED REVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR CODE DESCRIPTION 1993 o 1994 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 AMENDED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 - 1995 (7) OTHERS 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 01-3999 8522 Non*Abated Reimbursements 35,350 8523 Special District Reimbursement 699,680 8524 Reimbursement From RDA 2,112,930 8525 Firs District Payroll Abatement 115,720 8530 Reimbursement From Other Funds 230.990 35,000 666,700 2,314,720 150,920 324, 110 52,000 696,860 2,101,580 194,010 399,110 Total Others 3,194,670 3,491,450 3,413,560 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 25.210.880 ~8.375.830 29.440.140 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET FRTIMATFn RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES: ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 · 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 t15,010 BUDGETED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 1994 ' 1995 AMENOED REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994 ' 1995 AD 82-1R 6th SL Industial I Reserve 4600 Interest Eamings xxxx Trensfere In From Fund Balance _v_~x Transfers Out: To Fund 93 To,el AD 82-tlAgency Fund 8,000 0 0 8,000 10,000 0 2,000 11,260 0 3,280 98-3901 AD 86.2 R/C Drainage District 4600 InteNt Eamlnge xxxx Trensfere In From Fund B/lance Totel AD 86-2 Cap Proj Fund 4,000 232,020 236,020 218,880 221,880 0,490 18,780 22,210 96-3N) 1 g~3N)t 96-3901 96-3901 g6-xxxx AD 86-2 R,'C Drainage District I RedempUon 1020 Property Tax - C/Y Secured 1040 Property Tax - PlY Secured 1060 Penalty & InteNt 4600 Interest E/minge _~_~_~ Trensfera In: 6/gSmFrom Fd g/; 'gGxFrom Fund To,el AD 86.2/Agency Fund 200,260 2,000 4OO 3,4t0 0 206,070 192,870 3,640 730 2,500 3,280 203,020 183,380 S,gl0 1,460 1,970 4,000 196,740 97-3901 '97-xxxx gl-xxxx AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District I Reserve 4600 Intemt Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance xxxx Transfers Out; To Fund N 2,S00 0 0 180 (3,280' 4,880 0 Total AD 86-2/Agency Fund 880 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 AMENDED BUDGET F.~TIMATFF) RFVFNIIF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS POPULATION ESTIMATES.'. ACCOUNT CODE CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 DESCRIPTION 112,592 115,010 AMENDED BUDGETED BUDGETED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1995 109-3901 Metrolink Maintenance & Security Program 5880 Grant Income Total Metrollnk Maint. & Security Program Fund: 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 110-3901 Used Oil Recycling Grant 5880 Grant Income Total Used Oil Recycling Grant: 0 0 74,340 0 0 74,340 125-3901 125-3901 CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace 1020 Property Tax: Current Year Secured 4600 Interest Earnings Total CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace Fund: 0 432,210 432,500 0 8,650 4,320 0 440,860 436,820 131-3901 AD 93-1 Masi Commerce Center 7441 Developer Participation Fee Total AD 93-1 Masi Commerce Center 0 5,000 15,000 0 5,000 t5,000 TOTAL SPECIAL FUNDS 34.038.550 3~2.707,740 33.684.580 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS (INCLUDES FUND 01) 59.249,430 61,083.570 63,124,720 >- 10:07 3104327931 GROCERS ~SSOC California Grocers Association The Huuurable William Alexander Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall lo5o0 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 *.NXr) (i 'Mr(',:I, ~.JilC ~'lNt .~'r~'nto, ( A V!ll Tel ( 9I Fax! (911"~) (1fit W,tlcJ Tract Cemcr I ~,~ Ik'xdt ( .A 9(J'l,~ Tel Fax: Dear Mayor Alexander: This letter is in response to the proposed ordinance which would create Chapter 9.28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulating convcnlcnce s'cores by imposing rel~tla:ions requiring the installation of security cameras. This letter serves to reaffirm our position that the mandatory installation of secuxity cameras places an unfair and undue burden on an already struggling business community. While we applaud your efforts to work w~.th neighborhood stores, the imposition of this new and costly requirement will most certainly cause some businesses to tail and make new business think twice before establishing in Rancho Cucamonga. This position was well reflected by existing city businesses, including the Chamber of Commerce, at each public workshop conducted by city .~taff and bag not been adequately addressed by the proposed ordinance. If, indeed, it is the intent of the Ad Hoc Committee to establish recommended security guidelines for convenience stores, it follows that these voluntary guidelines could include securiW e. arnera,~, In fact, the recommended guidelines as enumerated in the staff report, have proven to go much farther towards eliminating security risks than the installation of security cameras. A$ai~ Sere is little evidence which shnws that video cameras are effective in deterring criminal behavior much less help with criminal apprehension. In a 199l study titled "An Assessment of Robbery. Deterfence Measures at Convenience Stores" {Figlie and Aurand, University of California at Riverside} it was concluded that the use of video equipment was not related to robbery reduction. While average robben/ra.ts~ dropped during the first year after installation of the video equipment, the rates bounced back to pre- installation rates during the secotld year. Regarding the lpecifi~:s of the pr0.9osed ordiVance- we reipeet~lty req~test *.hat the type and nurnb,~r tie ~eo~rity camer~ be SOeci~,'~ily dclineate~ within the Ordinnnce so that zhe cost to each and evel~ affected b, sinessCs ,',,n be adet, pmte]8 estimated. 85/16~1995 18:07 310432'7~al ,3A ~ROGERS ~6S0¢ PAe, E 83 Again we renew ant after to work with the City in the development of employee training program such as our Neighborhood Outreach Progrnm. it is cridc'al tlutt approaches to difficuh problcms bc inclusive of all affected parties and it is with this in mllld that we ask fur your suppurl. Thank yon sgain for your time and kind colksideration. I can be reached at 310/432-8610 if you have further comments or concerns. Sincerely, SSOCIA'I"ION BETH BEEMAN Vice President Local Government cc: City Counal