The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995/04/19 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. April 19, 1995 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Willjams, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander Biane , Curatalo Gutierrez , and Williams , B. ANNOUNCFMENTSIPRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamation recognizing April 23-29, 1995 as National Victims Week. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing Apdl as National Volunteer Month and April 24-30, 1995 as National Volunteer Week. Presentation of Proclamation designating Apdl as Fair Housing Month. Presentation of Proclamation to Jacqueline Bolda for her outstanding service to the community on both the Park and Recreation Commission and the Library Board of Trustees. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the contributions for the Adopt A Wall Program. Special presentation to Keith Keene for his help in apprehending taggers. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PURl IC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to fwe minutes per individual. City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/22/95, 3/29/95 and 4/5/95; and Payroll ending 3/23/95 for the total amount of $2,077,323.05. , Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 1995. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, to be funded form TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-4637-9401. RESOLUTION NO. 95-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval to adopt Government Access Channel Guidelines and Policy. , Approval to set special tax for Community Facilities Distdct No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) No Increase in Levy. RESOLUTION NO. 95-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) o Approval of Resolution establishing an annual levy within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, The Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District No. 82-1 R, The Rancho Cucamonga Drainage District No. 86-2 an Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1. No Increase in Levy. 12 18 19 23 38 40 46 City Cot~ncil Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 95-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). No Increase in Levy. RESOLUTION NO. 95-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). No Increase in Levy. RESOLUTION NO. 95-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) Approval of Summary Vacation of Flood Inundation Areas for Development Review 94-08, located on Tacoma Ddve approximately 600 feet east of White Oak Avenue within Parcels 10 and 11, modified Lot Line Adjustment No. 382, of Parcel Map No. 12959-1. RESOLUTION NO. 95-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-FLOOD INUNDATION AS SHOVVN ON PARCELS 10 AND 11, MODIFIED PER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 382, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1 47 48 49 56 57 65 City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 10. 11. 12. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between the property owners (see attached list) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street Between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 95-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS (SEE ATTACHED LIST), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Tract 13565-5 thru Tract 13565-10, located north of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities accepted by the County of San Bernardino on January 9, 1989 and transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 31:), 1989, both submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 95.048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU TRACT 13565- 10 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ON JANUARY 9, 1989 AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON OCTOBER 30, 1989 Approval to execute the Improvement Agreement and Security, and ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, for Development Review 94-16, generally located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ameron, Incorporated. 7O 71 73 75 78 City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 5 13. 14. 15 RESOLUTION NO. 95-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 RESOLUTION NO. 95-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 95-014) for Touch Pad System at East and West Beryl Parks to Western Power Systems for the amount of $43,055.00 ($39,150.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Landscape District No. 1 Account No. 40-4130-7043. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13280 located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 528,420.00 52,842.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13890-2 located on Lemon Avenue north of Highland Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $178,000.00 17,800.00 80 84 85 8E 87 City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 6 16. 17. 18. RESOLUTION NO. 95-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept a Faithful Performance Letter of Credit for a slope planting, accept Improvements, Release Letter of Credit and Notice of Completion for DR 92-11, located at 9400 Almond Street. Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $26,260.00 (Equestrian Trail) Accept: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit 1,000.00 (Slope Planting Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit 5,252.00 (Equestrian Trail) RESOLUTION NO. 95-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 92-11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 93-20, located on the southeast comer of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 20,400.00 RESOLUTION NO. 95-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 93-20 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval of Preliminary Engineers Report and Setting of the Public Headng for May 17, 1995 to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal year 1995/96 and approve the Engineers Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). 89 90 91 92 93 City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 7 19. 20. RESOLUTION NO. 95-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLUTION NO. 95-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO Approval of Preliminary Engineers Report and Seffing of the Public Headng for May 17, 1995 to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96 and approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 95-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 95-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995196 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report and Setting of the Public Hearing for May 17, 1995 to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96 and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. 95 96 105 108 109 172 City Co'.ncil Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 95-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 95-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 175 176 E. CONSFNT ORDINANCF$ The following Ordinance have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controvereial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISFD PUBIIC HFa, RINGS The following item have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. G. PUBIIC HFARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 9 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF COMMFRCIAL I AND USF AND MARKFT STUDY 242 I. COUNCIl BUSINFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. DISCUSSION OF PROGRAMS USFD BY CITIFS AND INTFRESTFD PARTIFS IN OFFI=RING AND MAINTAINING A RFVVARD PROGRAM (Continued from February 15, 1995) 2. RECOMMFNDATION FOR PARK & RFCRFATION COMMISSION VACANCY (Oral Report) 247 J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MFFTING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discues at the next meeting. These Items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUB! IC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent roesting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. I. ADJOURNMFNT MEETING TO RECESS TO EXECUTNE SESSION TO DISCUSS: (t) LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE RCV 059489, GENTRY BROTHERS VS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. (z) LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. City Council Agenda April 19, 1995 PAGE 10 EXECUTNE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO A JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON APRIL 25, 1995 AT 5:00 P.M. IN THE TRI- COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE CIVIC CENTER. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apdl 13, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours pdor to the meeting per Govemment Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Ddve. Z m ,-~ ,j .,J 0 k- )-- 4 -r, U w Z~ ~oo~o~~,~ ~o C:)C30O~,O[3 ee 7 ,eeeeeeeeeee, % UZ~a~ :/: :3 gg ,v H · I I · · · I I · · · I · · · I · · rs · · · · I I · · · · . · · uj · · ~3, · · ,l · · A. · · · · I1-.I \ · · ~1~1 · · w · · k- I · e( I I C:~ I · · · Z · · --~ · · 12:1 · · Iczl · · · · · · · I · I · · · I I · · · · · · I I · · · · · · · · · I · · · I I I · 12:1 1~.41 :~| · · I~-I · · I · · I · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I · · · I · · · · · · · I · I · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · luJI I · · · Ic~l Ir~l 12:1 I // "" f" ("' (" C t t · · I · t t · · I t · I I · q 04/11/1995 CITY OF PANCliO CUCAMONGA PM - 1 PORTFOLIO MASTER SUMMARY CITY MARCH 31, 1995 CASH AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYSTO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERN MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank ...............$ Local Agency Investment Funds ................$ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............$ Treasury Securities - Coupon .................$ Treasury Securities - Discount ...............$ Mortgage Backed Securities ...................$ Small Business Administration ................$ TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVERAGES ............ CASH 11,419,566.50 24.26 355 203 5.240 5.312 18,498,038.78 39.29 1 1 5.685 5.764 12,040,759.38 25.58 690 489 6.744 6.837 272,845.00 0.58 1,180 883 6.569 6.660 3,350,881.16 7.12 361 41 4.829 4.896 393,970.92 0.84 6,431 3,610 8.932 9.057 1,101,562.50 2.34 9,131 5,959 8.184 8.298 .$ 47,077,624.24 100.00% 563 352 5.878% 5.959% Passbook/Checking Accounts ...................$ 256,097.24 1.973 2.04)0 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 78,323.57 TOT~ CASH alld I~3RCHASE INTEREST .............$ 334,420.81 TOTAL CASB and INVESTMENTS .................$ 47,412,045.05 NO!fig{ ENDING FISCAL TOTAL EARNINGS MIRTH 31 YEAR TODATE Current Year $ 230,532.22 $ 1,710,552.81 DATE I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and is in comformity with investment policy adopted July 20, 1994. A copy of this investment policy is available in the Finance Division of the Administrative Services Del~rtment. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to m~t next month's estimated expenditures. 04/11/1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PM - 3 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS CITY MA]{(J{ 31, 1995 C. ASH ~ PURCHASE STATED --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT MORTGAGE BA~ED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HONE LOAN BAIQ< 02/23/87 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG AS,SN 09/21/87 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 07/01/87 0<N)69 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 07/01/87 70,866.543 72,754.89 442,907.10 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,469 155,149.90 167,956.59 612,753.80 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,634 133,847.04 135,713.10 663,389.28 8.5(M) 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,238 34,107.48 33,434.86 84,710.58 9.000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,177 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 393,970.92 4~,859.44 1,803,760.76 8.932 9.057 3,610 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 00004 SMALL BUSINESS ADNIN 07/25/86 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.~ 1,065,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 5,959 TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVERAGES $ 47,077,624.24 47,209,464.72 48,595,022.02 5.878% 5.959% 352 04/11/1995 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAIwX)NGA PM - 5 PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY MARCB 1, 1995 ' MAR~ 31, 1995 CASH STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT ~ ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00928 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 03/02/1995 00934 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 03/02/1995 127,921.00 00888 FOOq'HILL IlfD~ BANK 4.430 03/15/1995 00886 GREAT WESTERN 3.750 03/01/1995 00891 GREAT WESTERN 3.750 03/29/1995 00931 GREAT WESTERN 6.250 03/01/1995 500,000.00 00936 GREAT WESTERN 5.800 03/29/1995 500,000.00 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE: 127,921.00 11,919,566.50 1,127,921.00 1,627,921.00 11,419,566.50 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.779 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.528 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 981,000.00 981,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCE: 17,517,038.78 0.00 18,498,038.78 .dCKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 1,264,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,268,097.24 2,276,000.00 256,097.24 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00935 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 7.010 03/22/1995 BEGINNI3N~BALAMCE: 11,540,759.38 12,040,759.38 TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON BEGINNING BALANCE: 272,845.00 272,845.00 TREASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT BEGINNING BALANCE: 3,350,881.16 3,350,881.16 MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BAMK 8.000 0<)203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGASSN 9.000 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 03/15/95 03/27/95 03/07/95 BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,619.25 705.74 542.62 2,867.61 396,838.53 393,970.92 f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~leil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE '~NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM TDA ARTICLE 8, ACCOUNT NO. 12-4637-9401 RECOMMRNI)ATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specification for the consUnction of Traffic signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the '~lotice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/,A NA! ,YSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate was $100,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, 1995, with the bid opening scheduled for Tuesday, May 16 1995. City Engineer WJO:MDL:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "The Consu'uction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue Improvement Project". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEAI .ED BIDS OR PROPOSAI ,S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on May 16, 1995, sealed bids or proposals for the "The Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue Improvement Project" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "The Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue Improvement Project." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cask cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an mount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City ofRancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City ofRancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering ConWactor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is tree and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said 1;35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost oftnailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I, CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL GUIDELINES AND POLICY RECOMMENDATION: That the City Cotmcil consider adopting the attached Guidelines and Policy regarding the use of the Government Access Channel (RCTV-3). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Prior to the implementation of RCTV-3, the City's Government Access Channel, it is recommended that policy be developed and adopted for use of the channel. This will help minimize problems associated with implementing the access channel. Both the Guidelines for the Character Generator and the Policy regarding the channel have been reviewed by both the City Attomey's Office and Carl Pilnick of Telecommunications Management Corporation, the City's Cable Consultant. Also, attached is a copy of the submittal form for messages to be aired on the Community Calendar. The Guidelines will be on the reverse side of the submittal form. Submittal forms will be located at City Hall, the Community Centers and the Public Library. Respectfully Submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I attachments j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 (RCTV-3) OPERATIONS POLICY Regulations Governing the Use of the Government Access Channel Mission To offer the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga an innovative vehicle to receive and review vital government-related information and to promote a positive image of the City to its residents. Purpose The purpose of this document is to establish a policy to regulate the use of Municipal Cable Channel 3 (RCTV-3), the Government Access Channel, and to describe its use by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Objectives The objectives for use of RCTV-3 are: 1. To serve as a continuous source of government-related information for the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. To allow citizens to become aware of the functions and responsibilities of municipal government, including the functions of the various City Departments and the City Council. To serve as the official information center in the case of a local emergency (ie., flood, fire, crime, earthquake, etc.). To serve as a medium for the dissemination of quality cable television programming dealing with govemmental topics or approved City-sponsored community events. To assist all City Departments in the production of intemal training or promotional programs. Channel Administration Any reference to the City, Community, Government or Municipality is traderstood to exclusively mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its related departments. No other governmental body, agency or organization, public or private, is implied. RCTV-3 is an operating branch of the Administration Departxnent (City Manager's Office) of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 3 Programming Restrictions The City Manager's Office recognizes the programming content restrictions imposed on RCTV-3 by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Regulations, prevailing community standards and applicable Federal, State and local laws. In particular, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will not cablecast any programming containing the following: A, Obscene or indecent material. Obscenity or indecency will be determined by the City Manager or his designee and judged by prevailing community standards. B. Information or advertising concerning an illegal lottery. A lottery is defined by the FCC rules as an activity in which: A prize consisting of money or a thing of value is awarded to any person whose selection is dependent in whole or in part on lot or chance. As a condition of winning or competing for such prize, the winner or winners are required to furnish any money or thing of value. The three elements necessary to comprise a lottery are prize, chance and consideration. Advertising material designed to promote the sale of commercial products or services, or any programming in which commercial appeals for funds are made is prohibited. Grant sponsored programming shall not be considered as advertising. Advertising material includes, but is not limited to: a. Advertising by or on behalf of a candidate for public office. Messages whose primary purpose is intended to promote a service, product, trade, or business. Material made available without charge by those persons, corporations, or institutions having a commercial interest in the subject matter. This provision shall not prevent the identification, by name only, of persons or institutions providing grants or contributions to underwrite the costs of programs unrelated to the commercial interests of the donor. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 5 Program Types Programming on RCTV-3 shall be scheduled according to the following priorities: A. Emergency Emergencies may consist of live, taped, or character generated programming shown at any time, as an emergency dictates. The purpose of this programming will be to inform residents of emergency situations and to instruct viewers in evacuation,. detour, notification and escape procedures. In the case of an emergency, regularly scheduled programming may be interrupted or canoeled. The content and scheduling of any emergency programming must be approved by the City Manager or his designee. B. Live Programs Live program possibilities include, but are not limited to, special events coverage, such as the Annual Founders Day Parade. However, all live events must be duly sponsored/co- sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. Locally Produced Programs and Series Most programs and series will be produced in-house by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will be directly related to the City. Basically, the programming will be of a general information nature. D. Outside Programming Taped programming from other agencies whose content is deemed appropriate to the community's interest may be submitted for use on Channel 3. Such programming will be screened for suitability and compliance with Channel Objectives and Programming Regulations, and will be approved by the City Manager, or his designee, for scheduling on RCTV-3. E. Character Generation The Character Generator, a bulletin board style service, is used to display City-related messages to the public. It serves as a mode of programming and is used as filler when no other video programming is scheduled on RCTV-3. Access to this service is open only to City departments for City-related business or those agencies whose activities are co-sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or benefit the residents of Rancho CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 7 Messages will be input by the Cable Television Administrator or his designee on a Character Generator and will appear on the television screen a "page" at a time. Messages should be concise and contain basic information conceming who, what, when, where, how, the cost, and a telephone number for more information. Due to space limitations, the Cable Television Administrator, if necessary, will edit the message to improve readability, to make it fit on one screen page, or to ensure that the message is grammatically correct. The Cable Television Administrator reserves the right to enhance the graphic look of the message without department consent. All messages submitted must be accompanied by: a. The name of the submitting department or agency b. The name of a contact person and the Department head approval A telephone number where the contact person my be reached and whether or not that telephone number is to appear in the message. Submittals should include the desired start and end dates for air time. No classified advertisements, commercial messages, or commercial solicitations of funds will be permitted on RCTV-3. Receipt of a public service message does not in any way guarantee its appearance on RCTV-3. Suitability for this Channel and compliance with City policies will be determined by the City Manager or his designee. The date of input and the length of nm of any message will be determined by space limitations. Every attempt will be made to allow input of all messages received by the Cable Television Administrator. In the case that the channel capacity is full, messages will be carried on a first-come, first-served basis, with the following priorities, and noting that timely announcements will take precedence. a. Emergency and public service notification messages b. Announcements ordered by the City Council c. Announcements ordered by the City Manager d. Announcements submitted by City Department heads CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 9 d. Capabilities of staff and equipment Receipt of Project Request Form does not in any way guarantee approval of applicant's request. Completed programs and all work footage shall become the sole property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. It is the policy of the Cable Administration staff to retain completed programs indefinitely. During that period, tapes may be retained, or erased at the discretion of the Cable Television Administrator. Raw footage may be erased, consolidated or stored, as taped. Unless City Cable staff is contracted to shoot raw footage, said raw footage will not be made available. C, Equipment Usage Procedures Video equipment and facilities may be used by members of City staff, only under the direct supervision of the Cable Administration staff, and only after successfully completing a video basics in-service training program. To request use of the RCTV-3 facilities, approved users must file an Equipment Use Request Form no less than 60 days prior to the request date. The applicant will be required to state the date and time the facilities are requested, list the equipment required, and describe the event or the program to be taped. If approved, the applicant and any crew members may use the equipment while in the presence of an RCTV-3 staff person. No user shall permit an unapproved person to operate the equipment at any time. The Cable Administration staff shall hold regularly scheduled video training sessions for City personnel either independently or in cooperation with the public access channel of the cable company (s). Scheduling for such training shall be approved by the City Manager or his designee. Right of usage by any authorized person or agency will be limited to equipment and facilities provided. The RCTVo3 staff is not obligated to allow City equipment or facilities to be interfaced with any other equipment or facilities. Any user tampering with, adjusting or altering any City equipment or facility may be subject to immediate forfeiture of his/her fight to use said equipment or CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 1 i Objectives and City Policies and for technical quality. The program may be accepted or rejected, in whole or in part, by the City Manager or his designee based on any or all of the qualifying criteria. 4. No programming containing commercial advertising will be allowed on RCTV-3. If accepted, the Cable Television Administrator may determine when and how often the program will appear on the RCTV-3 schedule. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all copyrights and all clearance to all portions of the submitted program, including, but not limited to, video, performance, music, song, theatrical and film rights, and provide proof of such. Under the Fair Use Doctrine of the FCC, it is not necessary to obtain clearances for use of copyright materials for educational purposes. However, a written clearance is preferred to guarantee no infringement violations. If the applicant wishes the remm of the tapes after its run on RCTV-3, he must provide a mailing envelope or carton, with address label and sufficient postage, or should make arrangements to pick up the tapes within two weeks from the end of the program rim. Any tapes left longer than two weeks, unless otherwise arranged, shall be erased or discarded. The City retains the right to keep a copy of all programs cablecasted on RCTV-3. Emergency Procedures Emergency programming shall originate and be authorized by the City Manager or his designee as dictated in the City's Emergency Plan. Under no circumstances will access to RCTV-3 for emergency communications be granted anyone who does not have the proper authority to initiate emergency procedures. Live Coverage of City Functions In the event that a production unit, other than the RCTV-3 staff, obtains the authority and the capacity to produce live coverage of City events, the air time of the other production units's program on RCTV-3 must be arranged and is subject to the same approvals as outside programming. The City will make every effort to cooperate with any production unit that has obtained the proper clearances and has the ability to produce quality programming. 2. Standardization of programming procedures will ensure the highest quality coverage. GOVERNMENT ACCESS BULLETIN BOARD GUIDELINES The RCTV-3 Government Access Bulletin Board is a computerized listing of public service messages. It provides a listing of community events, community services, and emergency information. The calendar is maintained and managed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is offered as a public service. ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS Entities and groups eligible to submit messages for airing over RCTV-3 include: * Local government * Local public educational institutions * Local public agencies * Agencies whose events are co-sponsored by the City * Local non-profit agencies whose events benefit the residents of the City Message Preemption: While all messages are deemed important, the City reserves the right to preempt calendar messages in the event of a major disaster or emergency affecting the City. MESSAGE EVALUATION Each message is reviewed by the RCTV-3 Administrator for conformance with eligibility and content guidelines. Priority is given first to City-sponsored events and information. MESSAGE CONTENT REQUIREMENTS & RESTRICTIONS * Messages must be submitted, in writing, to the City Manager's Office in person, by mail or FAX. Printed message forms are made available at most City facilities. * Messages must be noncommercial in nature, serving the public interest. * Messages must be submitted at least one week before a scheduled event * Messages must be brief(approximately 75 words). All messages are subject to editing and condensation. * Time-sensitive messages will be displayed through the day of the event or specified deadline, if space permits. * Messages with no specific event time or deadline will be displayed for as long as space permits, at the Administrator's discretion. The following types of messages will NOT be considered: * Content considered obscene * Messages promoting illegal activities * Activities that attempt to defraud viewer or attempt to obtain money by fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises * Commercial advertising * Messages promoting, endorsing or opposing a political candidate, initiative or election issue. DISCLAIMER The Government Access Bulletin Board is being provided as a public service. Therefore, while the City shall endeavor to ensure that messages are transmitted accurately and in a timely manner, the City assumes no liability in connection with the Bulletin Board and makes no warranties or representations that any message will be transmitted accurately or at any particular time. The City cannot take responsibility for the factual accuracy of the information as submitted (i.e., dates, times, locations, name spellings and phone numbers). That responsibility rests with the originator of the information. DATE: TO: FRO M: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties from Fiscal Year 94/95 rates. Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) Residential Class II (3077-3589 S.F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI {Less than 2051 S.F.) Undeveloped Property $245 $944 $699 $524 S420 $349 $1,296/acre Special Tax B - Law Enforcement Residential Class I (3590 + S.F) Residential Class II (3077-3587 S.F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) SI.oo $1.oo $1.oo $1.oo $1.oo $1.oo BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to finance drainage facilities, police operations and maintenance costs. The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services are listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the collections A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 9.: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 1993/94 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994/95. SPECIAL TAX "A" - DRAINAGE FACILITIES PROPERTY ~TEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified as follows: DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 3 1 of any year. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (i) owned by a public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax 'A" rates for Fiscal Year 1995/96 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $944 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential II $699 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential III $524 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $420 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * STEP 4: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax 'A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax 'A' rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax 'A' Revenue. the Community Facilities District shall: Compare (i) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A'. The Base Maximum Special Tax "A' means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the lot or parcel. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX "B" - LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". The authorized Special Tax 'B" rates for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1.00 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential Class II $1.00 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential Class III $1.00 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $1.00 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * E. Residential Class V $1.00 per year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * F. Residential Class VI $1.00 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Commercial or industrial property $1,000 per acre per year ** DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .... April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THE ALTA oLOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT NO. 84-2, THE SIXTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK REFUND DISTRICT NO. 82-1R, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND MILLIKEN SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy of five dollars (85.00) per parcel for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District No. 82-1R, the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Drain District No. 86-2 and Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5°/6) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. Rather than calculate the fee on a percentage basis. staff recommends that the City should maintain the current rate of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public are funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. Respectfull bmitted, ' '~ert~ ~l~fl ez Admini ices Director RCD:IYB:jmf Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of. the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent {5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection, and in any case not to exceed $5.00 per lot or parcel. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBjECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council levy a special tax of $297.48 per acre by adopting the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of 820,225,000. Bonds were issued in August of 1985 in the amount of S18,000,000 to finance the construction of the Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Milliken, Rochester and Highland and the northe~y city limits was annexed into the district. On April 1, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-079 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in May, 1992 in the amount of $16,530,000. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per acre when the district was formed. Since the formation, the rate has been $350.00 per acre with additional funding being contributed by the Redevelopment Agency. However, when the refunding was done, the rate was reduced from $350 to $297.48 per acre which equated to a $52.52 per acre savings to the property owners. Respectfully submitted, guezC Adminis~ra~iive Services Director RCD:IYB:jmf Attachments: Resolution Exhibit Annual Status Report Map REsourno~ x~o. ~),~,., ~) L/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM} WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994-95 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A, Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C, Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-I (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) EXHIBIT "A" The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones: 1. ZONE "A": General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Zone "B". 2. ZONE "B": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone "B": consists of those properties bounded on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD, and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective zones, being Zone "A" and Zone 'B", is as follows, based upon an estimated bond amount of $18,000,000 payable over a period of twenty (20) years. ZONE "A": $297.48 PER ACRE. ZONE "B": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES. For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax, "ACRE" shall mean acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1995 BACKGROUND On June 26, 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the amount of $18,000,000 were issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by Rochester Avenue and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into the district. The first annual special tax rate of $350 per acre was set by City Council in Fiscal Year 1985/86. This rate has never been increased in the ensuing fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to 8297.48 per acre. Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment. All phases of construction for the Day Creek Drainage System are completed. The construction contract was administered by the County of San Bernardino. FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1995/96 along with the Redevelopment Agency contribution of $1,000,000 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $1,749,980. U NN II DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBjECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RE P O R T Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal year 1995/96 is set at $14,670 per acre. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations and other debt of the district. Respectfully submitted, RCD:IYB:jmf Attachments: Resolution Exhibit 'A' Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Tifie 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994-95 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. -~ 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1995 BACKGROUND On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 The first annual tax rate of $14,670 for fiscal year 1995/96 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt senrice in the amount of $398,000. II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 19, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O~qeil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF FLOOD INUNDATION AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-08, LOCATED ON TACOMA DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE WITHIN PARCELS 10 AND 11, MODIFIED PER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 382, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1. RECOMMR. NDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of the flood inundation areas as shown and described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. BACKGROUND//k NA I .YSIS On August 25, 1994, the Planning Division approved Development Review No. 94-08, for the development of an industrial building on lots 10 and 11 (modified per Lot Line Adjustment No. 382) of Parcel Map No. 12959-1. As a condition of approval the project was required to vacate the recorded flood inundation areas within the property and dedicate the replacement flood inundation areas which provide the same or more capacity. On March 22, 1995, the Planning Commission determined the vacation conforms to the General Plan and recommended the vacation occur. The new flood inundation areas have been dedicated and recorded. Section 8333 of the Streets and Highways Code states local agencies may summarily vacate a public easement if said easement has been superseded by relocation. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neii City Engineer WJO:JDdlw Attachments: Vicinity Map Exhibits "A" and "B" - Lcgals of existing flood inundation areas Resolution V- 133 Map ,/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-FLOOD INUNDATION AS SHOWN ON PARCELS 10 AND 11, MODIFIED PER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 382, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8333, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the right-of-flood inundation areas as shown over Parcels 10 and 11 of Parcel Map No. 12959-1, herein more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said right-of-flood inundation have been superseded by relocation and therefore are no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating said right-of-flood inundation area as shown on Map V-133 on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B", and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said right-of-flood inundation no longer constitutes the portion of parcel 10 and 11 as shown on Parcel Map No. 12959-1. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. P.M. 12959 CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ,c~NGINEERING DIVISION miT:. VICImTY MAP VAC-133 WAN EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR FLOOD INUNDATION AF, tEAS THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 10 AND 11, PARCEL MAP NO, 12959-1, PARCEL MAP BOOK 170, PAGES 73-78, LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 382, PARCEL "B", DOCUMENT NO. 94388092 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. ~~- ~/~ ~ ~-'~'~' TIMOTHY P. MIM MACK, RCE 33340, EXP. 6-30-98 O ,.JOB-NC~ 1~Bq%~T-54~LEG2-] S.,Uel CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNERS (SEE ATTACHED LIST) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR ~ CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) ttRCOMMR~ATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvement and accepting Right-of-Way Dedication from the property owners. BACKGROUNDIANA! .YSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. The property owners have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the sweet construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to their property. In this regard, the property owners have executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respec y submi~,7,~~ Willi~ City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS (SEE ATTACHED LIST), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the property owners have agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bcmardino County, California. // DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Vatbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT-AND INiPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU TRACT 13565-10, LOCATED NORTH OF 24TH STREET AND EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES ACCEPTED BY THE COL.~TY OF SAN BERNARDINO ON JANUARY 97 1989 AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON OCTOBER 30, 1989, BOTH SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that tile City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and securities. releasing Improvement Agreements and hnprovement Securities accepted by tile County of San Bemardino on January 9. 1989 and transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 30. 1989. and authorizing the Mayor and tile City Clerk to sign and release said agreements and securities. BAC.'.(G;~OUND/ANALYSIS The hnprovement Agreement and Securities of Tract 13565-5 thru Tract 13565-10 xvere approved by the County of San Bernardino on January 9, 1989 and transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 30, 1989. The Developer, Standard Pacific Corp., is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LABOR AND MATERIAL MONUY. IENTATiON (Cash Bond~ 13565-5 Streets $187,000.00 $ 94.000.00 $4.300.00 13565-6 Streets $427,000.00 $214,000.00 $4.350.00 13565-7 Streets $149,000.00 $ 75,000.00 S4,600.00 13565-8 Streets $292,000.00 S146,000.00 $4.550.00 13565-9 Streets $174.000.00 S 87,000.00 $4.450.00 13565-10 Streets $ 93,000.00 S 47,000.00 53.9'30.00 San Sevaine Road $757,000.00 S379.000.00 Crestline Place $593,000.00 S297.000.00 MWD Landscape Easement $488.000.00 S244.000.00 '7-5 RESOLUTION NO. q.--~" C)4(2~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCFtO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU TRACT 13565-10 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDNO ON JANUARY 9, 1989 AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON OCTOBER 30. 1989 WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 19, 1995, by Standard Pacific Corp.. as developer. ibr the improvement specifically described therein, and generally located north of 24th Street and east of Wardman Bullock Road: and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreements and Securities accepted by the County of San Bernardino on January 9, 1989, from Standard Pacific Corp., and trans/rbrred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 30. 1989. WHERE.,\S. said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient i lnprovement Securities, which are ideatilled in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, I'HEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C,,\LIFORNIA. HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said hnprovement Securities be and the same are herebv approved. release of previously submitted Improvement · ',.~rcen:.,:nts and In~provement Securities accepted by the County of San Bernardino on .ianuar', i089. I'rom Standard Pacilk Corp.. and translbrred to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga on Oc:ober ;0. 1989. and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City or' Rancho Cucamonga. and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ' -m ' ~, ej4l. I7 /~'~~,CIC)i~it {XTAtt. ';6' q N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA KNG~rNG DIVI~ON ~ TR I,,~565-B Tt/RU-/O x% JF.,~HIKIF[~, A 7(..,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19,1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY AMERON, INCORPORATED RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject improvement agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Planner approved Development Review 94-16 for the construction of an 18,600 square foot building to house a Coal Tar Enamel Application Facility on a portion of one of five parcels owned by Ameron at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit "A"). The conditions of approval for the project required installation of a storm drain from Sixth SU'eet to the northerly project boundary, and street improvements fronting the property. The Developer has submitted an improvement agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $1,057,850.00 $528,925.00 Copies of the improvement agreement and securities and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the property owner(s) are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully/s~itted, City Engineer WJO:JAD:dlw ~,~Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 WHEREAS, Development Review 94-16, submitted by Ameron, Incorporated, located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, was approved by the City Planner for the construction of an 18,600 square foot building to house a Coal Tar Enamel Application Facility on a portion of one of five parcels owned by Ameron. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in the Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, pursuant to the time frames outlined, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as Development Review 94-16; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified is said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Pan 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional terntory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. STREET LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE _Y AM~.~O N NO. 3B ////////////// ' DR 94-16 !APN 229-131-03' DISTRICT NOS. I AND ' .,. CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .<~, ~ STATS O~' CALIFORNIADR 6 _.j I": 1000' 94--16 .-~N 229-131-03 f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager William J. O~qeil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR TOUCH PAD SYSTEM AT EAST AND WEST BERYL PARKS, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $43,055.00 ($39,150.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCOUNT NO. 40-4130-7043 TO WESTERN POWER SYSTEMS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for Touch Pad System at East and West Beryl Parks, to the lowest responsive bidder Western Power Systems for the amount of $43,055.00 ($39,150.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Landscape District No. 1, Account No. 40-4130-7043. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited Tuesday, February 7, for the subject project. No bids were received. Staff then solicited bids from several contractors. Western Power Systems was the only respondent with a bid amount of $39,150.00. The Engineer's estimate was $43,600.00. Respectfully Submitted, William Joe O~Neil City Engineer WJO:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Apfil19,1995 City Council and City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ~ ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13280 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13280 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $52,842, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $528,420. Background/Analysis Tract 13280 - located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. DEVELOPER: Accept: Premier Homes, PGI #38 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 250 Corona, CA 91720-2871 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $52,842.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $528,420.00 Respectfully submitted, WJO:SMG:Iy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13280 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -,~ STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~leil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect~ ' ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13890-2 LOCATED ON LEMON AVENUE NORTH OF HAVEN AVENUE RECOMbIENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13890-2 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $17,800, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $178,000. BACKGROUND/.A NAI .YSIS Tract 13890-2 - located on Lemon Avenue north of Highland Avenue DEVELOPER: Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $17,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $178,000 Greystone Homes 495 E. Rincon # 115 Corona, CA 91719 Respectfully bmittedz ; William JoZ~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:alr Attachments RESOLUTION NO. (~y.~-- ~2) D~'2~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13890-2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O~qeil, City Engineer Steve Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II APPROVAL TO ACCEPT A FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR A SLOPE PLANTING, ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF LETTER OF CREDIT AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR DR 92-11, LOCATED AT 9400 ALMOND STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required Equestrian Trail improvements for DR 92-11 has been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept a Faithful Performance Letter of Credit in the amount of $1,000.00 for a slope planting, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit in the amount of $5,252.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit in the amount of $26,266.00. BACKGROUND/ANA! ,YSIS DR 92-1 ! - located at 9400 Almond Street. DEVELOPER: Randolph S. Davis and Sandra P. Davis 9400 Almond Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Accept: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit to complete the planting and establishment of a slope created when the equestrian trail was constructed. $1,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit (Equestrian Trail) $ 5,252.00 Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (Equestrian Trail) $26,266.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. Oei~!~/~C City Engineer WJO:SG:diw Attachment j RESOLUTION NO. q~-- ~) 5.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 92-11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 92-11 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 City Council and City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I~ ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR DR 93-20 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for DR 93-20 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $20,400. Background/Analysis DR 93-20 - Located on the southeast comer of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street DEVELOPER: Lee & Stires, Inc. 634 S. Palmetto Avenue Ontario, Califomia 91762 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $20,400 ResPectfu~~,~~t; WJO:SMG:ly RESOLUTION NO. q.....~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 93-20 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 93-20 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 3, 1995, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMRNDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report and set the public heating for May 3, 1995, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the Fiscal Year 1995/96. It is also recommended that then be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1995/96. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1995/96. BACKGROUND/ANAl .YSIS: Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) will not be increasing their water rates in the first half of the FY 95/96 but there may be an increase in January of 1996. This is due to the fact that CCWD is in the middle of a water conservation study and the restfits will not be available until later on in the year. If there is a rote increase in January it will be applied to all users in A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pan thereof and finds that each and every pan of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any pan thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminaxily approved and confirmed. , That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confumed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Re rt for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the purposes of all subsequent proce]ic~ngs. RESOLUTION NO. q,~., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code oft he State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common park purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. I .ocation of Work: SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Park and Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of Assessment Districts: SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Improvement District No. (PD-85), indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for funhe, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. I Preliminary I ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PD-85 Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer -I City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 1995/96 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 95/96 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIFIA. Properties owned by public agencies; such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad ~e right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. Proposed Maintenance Budget: Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Vehicle Maint../Operations Maintenance & Operations Equipment Maintenance Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equip. Rental General Liability Contract Services Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: 95/96 $258.830 $95.770 $24.000 $76.480 $4.000 $2.000 $12.640 $30.300 $96.650 $95.950 $697,820 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Debt Service Subtotal: $256,890 $48,566 $677,000 $982,456 Gross Revenue Required: $1,680,276 Add: 94/95 District Deficit $978 Assessment Revenue Required: $1,681,254 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1995/96 is $52.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $52.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1993/94 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres & larger $ 26.00 $ 78.00 $ 182.00 $ 364.00 $ 728.00 $1,300.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 1995/96 ASSESSMENTS 22,600 Single Family Parcels 265 Multi-Family Parcels Less than 1.50 Acres (1182 Parcels) 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (417 Parcels) 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres (203 Parcels) 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (123 Parcels) 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (41 Parcels) 25.01 Acres or larger (22 Parcels) 22600 units at 5825 units at 1182 units at 417 units at 203 units at 123 units at 41 units at 22 units at 30,413 units $52.00 $52.00 $ 26.00 $ 78.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 = $1,175,200 = $302,900 = $30,732 = $ 32,526 = $ 36,946 = $ 44,772 = $29,848 = $28.600 $1,681,524 /C>._~ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O?qeil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 3, 1995, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMF, NDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Preliminary Engineer's Reports and set the public hearing for May 3, 1995, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rams in these districts for Fiscal Year 1995/96. RACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, it is recommended that assessment rates not be increased in any of the Landscape Maintenance Districts for the FY 1995/96. Reasons for this recommendation include water costs savings due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild summer. Water conservation efforts include a program to computerize the irrigation systems for all of the District's maintained landscape areas. So far, all of the district's parks and approximately 25% of the landscape areas within the districts are on the system. In many of the districts the tax delinquency rote has decreased and back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some districts an increase in the amount of landscape area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. These costs will be offset by increases in revenue. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessments revenue requirements. In some districts this is still true and has allowed 'the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 95/96 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS April 19, 1995 Page 3 carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Complex is maintained by this district. Landscal>e Maintenance District No.4 - Terra Vista It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $252.50 for the FY 95/96. LMD #4 has 28.25 acres of parks. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5- Tot Lot It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $113.29 for the FY 95/96. I .andscape Maintenance District No. 6 - Caryn It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $246.97 for the FY 95/96. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. l .andscape Maintenance District No. 7 - North F. tiwanda In LMD No. 7 there is a fund balance of over $400,000. It is recommended these funds be utilized for construction of the Northeast Park located on East Avenue north of Summit Avenue. It is also recommended that the assessment rate remain at $307.05 for the FY 95/96. I .andscal~ Maintenance District No. 8 - South F. tiwanda It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $151.45 for the FY 95/96. Respectfully Submitted, i William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:dlw Atlachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a re rt in writing as ca/led for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this CounciFFfotr consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pan thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and ex nses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewi~hPe,, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and continned. , That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confumed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Re rt for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the purposes of all subsequent procee"idlxi~ngs. ESOLUTIO q 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work: SECTION I: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the maiptenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedication for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. I .ocation of Work: SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of Assessment Districts: SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said dislxicts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Landscape M '_aintenance Disu'ict No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No., 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. I Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) I Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ........... I /1/ "~": "~2ity:of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 30.81 acres of landscape area and 38.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMI)'s. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and parks. The 38.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5 acres of Church Street Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 94/95 95/96 Ground Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.97 Tuff 1.47 1.47 Parks 38.25 38.25 Community Trails 7.00 7.37 Total Area in LMD #1 68.19 Acres 69.06Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. PrOjected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of tuff, ground cover and shrubs and the maintenance of the parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and For 95/96 the Capital Project Outlay budgeted for the district is as follows; $12,000 for soccer field renovation at Beryl Park $10,000 for tree, shrub and groundcover replacement throughout the district, $151,250 for calsense retrofits throughout the district, $7,000 for slurry seal and restriping parking lot at Beryl, Church and Old Town Parks, $10,000 for the replacement of exercise equipment for Bear Gulch Park. Capital Equipment Outlay of $700 for plan files and $960 for 30% of two irrigation remote controls.. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $10,260 for 17% of a truck with aerial tower and $15,750 for 15% of 6 - 1/2 ton pick up trucks with utility body. Analysis: Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #1 decreased from $942,040 in FY 94/95 to 911,600 for FY 95/96. Proposed water usage costs have decreased again for the upcoming year due to the water conversation effort. This factor along with a 94/95 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain constant. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The FY 95/96 assessment rate is $92.21, this is no increase over FY 94/95 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ Land Use Type U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 7156 $92.21 1.0 $92.21 $659,854 Multi-Family Parcel 5456 $92.21 0.5 $46.11 $251.576 Total $911.430 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~ r -'l PROJECT sv'r~ APN OZOf-~I$-20 ~ mmmmtm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA, ,N.T $ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~V' AND~EA~ 0~~~ 37 ,'~ '· '''~ ;ARW~o C~RT 25 8 ~ 6 1 33 28' ~ 1~ 5 ~ ~ 31 ~ 30 17 V 16 3 ~ 2 /////7//////////~////~ NOTE: TRACT 13703 WAS ANNEXED TO DISTRICTS ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991, PER RESOLUTION NO. 91-046 LEGEND ~ CITY MAINTAINED AREAS PER RES. 91-046 CITY MAINTA/NED AREAS ADDED PER THIS MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR. 13703 AMBER LANE ADDITION Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMLrNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LIVID #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Commumty. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for thig district are charged to those parcels within that planned COmmunity. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, Community Trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. Eliena Park, which is 4.87 acres will be accepted into this district for maintenance this fiscal year. Ellena Park is located on Ellena East at Kenyon Way and will come on line in November of 1995. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 94/95 95/96 Ground Cover and Shrubs 47.99 47.99 Tuff 40.13 40.13 Parks 27.50 32.37 Community Trails 3.00 3.00 Total Area in LMD #2 118.62Acres 124.96 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. For FY 95/96 the district budgeted $2,000.00 for Capital Outlay/Building Improvements for restroom roof repair at Windrows Park; $13,000 for Capital Outlay/Equipment for 50% of a Bac Vac Mower and $600.00 for a Blower Line Trimmer; $10,500 for 10% of 6 one-half ton pickups with utility bodies for Capital Outlay/Vehicle and $7,500 for 12% of a 1.5 ton pickup with a 35' aerial tower. Also budgeted is $29,680 for ADA Retrofit for parks; $35,000 for Kenyon Park irrigation; $38,000 for concrete fence replacement at Windrows Park, North Victoria Windrows and Etiwanda Trail; $6,590 for tree, shrub and groundcover replacement; $12,000 for Catsense Retrofits; $4000 for Slurry seal and restripe parking lots at Windrows, Kenyon, Vintage and Groves Parks; and $960 for 30% of 2 irrigation remote controls. Analysis: In FY 94/95, the assessment rate for LMD #2 was $422.00. It is recommended this rate not increase for the FY 95/96. Part of the reason that the rate did not increase is due to the fact that water usage is down partly due to the implementation of the Calsense Moisture Control irrigation system and partly because of the increase of rainfall last season, the decrease in tax delinquency and the back payment of taxes which include interest and penalties. There were no new assessment units added to the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type U~ts Rate Factor Revenue Single Family Parcel 3,764.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $1,588,408 Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $ 52,320 Commercial Acre 20.67 $422.00 2.0 $844.00 $ 17,443 Vacant Acre 472.80 $422.00 0.25 $105.50 $ 49.881 TOTAl ,S 4,400.74 $1,708,060 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Califorma (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD #3a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived ~'om the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Ground Cover and Shrubs Tuff Total Area in LIVID #3 a 94/95 95/96 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3a are as follows: C 3: 3AV i3V~ Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3b (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). BackS, round: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LIVID #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercialandustrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (this does not inculde the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 94/95 95/96 Ground Cover and Shrubs 6.74 7.10 Tuff 3.29 3.39 Parks 22.87 22.87 Total Area in LMD #3b 32.90 Acres 33.36 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas in the median island, parkways and entry monuments are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The Adult Sports Park is maintained by City maintenance crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3b are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company and by City maintenance crews at the Adult Sports Park. /SI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #3B ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 June 15, 1994 MDR 94-03 2.65 A.U. July 20, 1994 CUP 93-17 1.02 A.U. Sept. 21, 1994 DR 93-20 2.99 A.U. Nov. 2, 1994 DR 94-03 3.87 A.U. Nov 2, 1994 CUP 94-03 4.23 A.U. Dec. 7, 1994 CUP 93-04 3.57 A.U. Dec 7, 1994 MDR 94-12 22.09A. U. Dec. 21, 1994 DR 94-06 18.66 A.U. Jan. 4, 1995 CUP 94-16 2.15 A.U. March 1, 1995 PM 14635 7.38 A.U. March 15, 1995 PM 14647 353.35 A.U. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 94-148 8,e'/V I,',4.N ~ Ci~4laIRRIT'y "r'A4/~,, ,,4 · 7',( lap'"/" ,./--Comenatty ,.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAFIDINO. STATE 0¥ CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOB. 1 AND 6 ,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~~. i STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIE4RA VISTA 9AFr. IST C~%.'4CH DR 94-03 /-~7 VICINITY MAP AF'N :::3 210-071-37 APN 0 - STREET ./ N1'I · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r-uP EXHIBIT 'A ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OlSTRICT NO S. 1 AND f5 ~A/~C~L A ~OT ~IN~' AOJU~TM~NT NQ. ~ ~/ ~ ~X/~,T Sr,(:arar?' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET lIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO~S. I AND 6 CITY OF RANClIO GUCAMQNQ&' COUNTY OF ~jlkN BIRN/iRDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PI~ 14,635' E I I /,,/~ ~ I Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 ! I Approved: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer /4~ ~'~' '~ C~ity of Raucho Cucim0nga'~ '~: Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tetra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tetra Vista Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD ~4) represents landscape sites throughout the Tetra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Tetra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 28.25 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway Park and Spruce Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 94/9;5 95/96 Ground Cover and Shrubs 8.35 8.35 Tuff 6.58 6.58 Parks 28.25 28.25 Total Area in LMD/~4 43.18Acres 43.18Acres The tuff, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD/14 are for direct maintenance of tuff, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD ~4 are as follows: the facilities maintenance crews that service the restroom buildings and various structure s in all of the parks in the Terra Vista Community. Analysis: A greatly reduced tax delinquency, payment of back taxes that include interest and penalties and a 94/95 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain constant. In FY94/95 the assessment rate for LMD ~4 was 252. 50/A.U. It is recommended not to increase for the FY 95/96. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation Chart. FY 95/96Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rata. l .and Use Tv~e U~ts A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1660.00 $252.50 $419,150 Multi Parcel 2610.00 $222.00 $579,420 Commercial Acre 147.33 $382.99 $56.420 TOTAl, $1.054.990 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped Tot Lot, located on the southwest comer of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those specific parcels. There is only one site maintained by the district. It con~.~ts of a Tot Lot and a small mount of shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities of maintained areas consist of: Ground Cover and Shrubs Total Area in LMD #5 94/95 95/96 0.33 0.33 0.33 Acres 0.33 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. PrOjected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These ~mctions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: 11 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ! /-~7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LIVID #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived ~'om the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Cax,/n that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, community trails, street trees and paseos. 1.70 acres of maintained landscape area will be accepted into the district this fiscal year, these areas include portions of Rochester Ave Parkway and Banyan Street parkway and community trail. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Ground Cover and Shrubs Tuff Community Trails 94/95 95/96 19.34 20.74 3.94 3.94 3.00 3.30 26.28 Ac 27.98 Ac The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the Citys Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD ~ are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel l, 171.00 $246.97 1.0 $246.97 Revenue $289.202.00 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Appproved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer /~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived ~'om the landscape instalhtion can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 94/95 95/96 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.54 7.54 Tuff 4.02 4.02 Community Trails 2.00 2.00 Total Area m LMD #7 13.56Ac 13.56 Ac The raft, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Commllnity Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These fimctions, along with tree maintenance and certain imgation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows: / G_5 Ana. lysis: The FY 95/96 rate of assessment is $307.05 per unit. FY 94/95. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate./. Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel 987.00 $307.05 1.0 $307.05 It is recommended there be no increase from Revenue $303.060.00 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS RI'URT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~DNGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D]goI'RICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engh,t~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughore the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived ~om the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Commtll3ity Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Ground Cover and Shrubs Tuff Community Trails Total Area in LIVID #8 94/95 95/96 0.23 0.23 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.37Ac 0.37Ac The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of tuff, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A. U, Single Family Parcel 108.00 $151.45 1.0 $151.45 Revenue $16.350.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O~Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING PUBLIC HEAR/NGS FOR MAY 3, 1995, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City council approve the preliminary Engineer's Reports and set public hearing for May 3, 1995, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and 8. It is recommended there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1995/96. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1995/96. BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates in all eight of the Street Light Maintenance Districts are not recommended to be increased this fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. Southern Califomia Edison has advised the City that there will be a rate decrease of 1.76% for street lights. Therefore electrical charges are expected to remain stable .and the current assessment rate will cover the actual costs of the districts. In prior years State Gas Tax Funds were used to subsidize the districts. At the present time, each district is able to stand on its own without additional funding from other sources. In some districts there is an increase in the number of street lights being maintained however these will not affects the assessment rate at this time. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the applicable districts. In addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, will also be borne by the applicable districts. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for the FY 95/96 and will allow the assessment rates to remain stable. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 95/96 rates which are not recommended for an increase from the FY 94/95rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to offset maintenance costs. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS April 19, 1995 Page 3 not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 - South Etiwanda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district, but remain at $193.75 for Fiscal Year 1995/96 This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed to the district it is expected that the street light-to-assessment unit will be reduced thereby reducing the assessment rate. Respectfully submitted, William. J. O~Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:dlw Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Reports RESOLUTION NO. q.~_ c.~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7AND8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every art of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be mo~ii~ed in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineet's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confuTned. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby prelimina~ly approved and confirmed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby prelimina~ly approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Re rt for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the purposes of all subsequent proce["d~mgs RESOLUTION NO. q~...~. ~ (~7 E) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work: SF. CTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintemmoe Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. I ,ocation of Work: SECTION ~: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance DisU'icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of A.~sessment l~istricts: SF, CTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expens~ thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4', "Map of Sn'eet Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No., 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance DisUict No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. I Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipate to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: , I E i i j r,=-i /~/ Resol~i~ ~.94~30 EXMIBIT .&. LANDA,,SS~:SSMEN'r DIAGRAM" SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 .IR.,I'I' · · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA '///f"/"~";"'?/ Rssolu~cim No. 94-116 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 P.M. NO. ~e P.M.B. J09/41-43 3.~s ^c. ~. CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA '~ ~ L EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 APN ZOf-14,,{-80 Z.~8& CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~3-zo N.T.S. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIC~ NO~. I AND 2 If | PRo .l E c.'r' APN .tel MillIll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA' I.I.T S COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR. ,e EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~ N~ w ~ ~=R~8~= ~/~'~/T / 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~"-rH .,~"'~EET'- ~IA~'A,'r~'D 0 - "F'P-,EeS 0 0 0 0 CITY OF ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEiItXNG DIVlMION MDR 94-'21 ORDERING ANNEXATION N DIAGRAM MAP /~_~ A~,SESSMENT DIAGRA,~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 , / A.T. & S.F. R/R (METROL[NK) 7TH STREET PROJECT SITE 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE APN 229-283-12 FOURTH STI~I~T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~N.T.S. CUP 94-16 PROJECT: APN 209-272-01,04,07 AND 08; 210-081-22. AND 23; 210-082-02, 11,17,37,38 AND 39; AND , 210-361-01 THRU 26 "ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P.M. NO. 14647 G.r}. c, ol .F COl r~i:.V!:.l Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer /q8 City of Rancho Cucamonga -' _ :~, Aremud Eqineer:s Report - ... ,..-.,:: ,_ :, , Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become pan of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency mount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipate to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: ~IINNINIII ~.~ L_. ":, '"1' /lIeraIl ' -~, i.'__._,-*-'-'- 1 : .... "" "' 'd'~~i !-, '~ "- "~'.ll/"',.';r"sr . . ;_.,,~. "~,~i~/' *. 11 1 i1 i' 1'1 ~il ~/ Resolution No. 94-039 EXHIIIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONOA COUNTY Of SAN BIRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA -~' ft-// Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of ener~zing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southem California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: .r Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 L__ Approved: [] William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Tetra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl~round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD ~4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of BEe Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD ~4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency Resoluticri No. 94-030 Pa~e3 EXHIS~T 'A' P . · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTy OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer I ,m City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance DLs~ No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traft~c signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Mi!liken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become pan of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern Californm Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a pan of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. Funds camed over from the 94/95 Fiscal Year will allow the district to install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. I Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Fiscal Year 1995/96 ! Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer I i City of Rancho Cucamonga . · ,, Annual Engineex's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD ~6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become pan of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a pan of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $33,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive ~T~/ EXHIBIT .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 94-i16 Pa,:~e3 P.M. NO. ~t F.M.B. J09/41-43 3.~s ^c. ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~ , ~-~ EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 APN ZO~7-1~.tr-80 N.T. rm. . . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~a-Zo EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 9~6 S, aINTA A/v'IT"M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 O O O ~u CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGXNEEEXNG D~ON N ~ tv~DR 94-'21 TTEX~ CRDERiNG ANNEXATION .:XH,H1T: A~,SESSMENT DIAGRA,4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. ! AND 6 , / A.T. & S.F. R/R (METROLINK) 7TH STREET PROJECT SITE 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE APN 229-283-12 FOURTH N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA CLIP 94-16 PROIECT: APN 209-272.01,04,07 AND 08; 210-081-22 A.NI) 23; 210..082-02, 11,17,37,38 A.N]) 39; AND , 210-361-01 TI-IRU 26 ' .)I.~.R_T., r' / CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P.M. NO. 14647 ~.r). ('d'M'.F ~--OTIR.RF. !'}EVI:..T .t3P~ ! ! Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become pan of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company~s rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a pan of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax EI I I ! Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 8 [ (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally thi.~ area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District ~.mds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become pan of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of ener~zing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a pan of the work program of the district. PrOjected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000 and $8,100 for street light inventory. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a E I I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 19, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF COMMERCIAL LAND USE AND MARKET STUDY Economic development is an integral component of our City's planning activities. Recently, attention has been focused on the commercial retail sector of the community because of the positive fiscal impact it has on the City's overall economic base. Recent land use amendments have added acreage to the City's commercial land inventory and modified the General Plan at various locations. The Planning Commission, in reviewing these requests, believes that additional requests may be generated as changes occur in the economy. The Planning Commission believes that since the master plan was adopted in 1981 and many economic changes have occurred since then, and both the validity of the General Plan and the City's economic development are so important, it is the desire of the Commission to take a fresh look at not only the General Plan as it relates to commercial/retail activities but the current economic basis upon which decisions should or should not be made with respect to land use decisions. Without identifying and documenting the current economic trends, constraints, opportunities, and practices, decisions could be made on dated assumptions or worst yet, be made piecemeal in a vacuum. It is important to the General Plan to maintain current data to provide a more comprehensive approach to planning these commercial areas of the City and insuring proper land use relationships balancing the needs of economic development with all the other goals of good land use planning. The Commission is concemed that piecemeal decisions may render the general plan process meaningless. Yet the Commission recognizes that changes in economic trends may require rethinking certain planning assumptions and approaches. Questions that beg answers today are: What commercial oppommities, amenities, and constraints influence commercial activity in the '90s? How much commercial land and development is beneficial to the City? What are the commercial shortfalls and leakages? What is the latest commercial land absorption ability for the City in the next 5 to 10 years? What is the fiscal cost-benefit? Do changes in the economy create new assumptions and how do these assumptions affect land use relationships for the future? To answer these and other questions affecting planning for economic development, the Commission proposes to conduct a comprehensive study of commercial land use. Important to the completion of such a study is accomplishing a market analysis and fiscal component upon which all commercial land use decisions are to be made. In order to do this, a specialized market analysis and fiscal component will have to be done by a consultant. (Estimated cost of such a work product is $50,000.) It is estimated that the market and fiscal components of this project can be accomplished within four CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1995 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager E. David Barker, Planning ' ' ' COMMF. RCIAI, I,A ND ~Ern~°~Ah;~F~TUDy Eight months ago, at the direction of the Planning Commission, the attached memorandum was sent to the Mayor and City Council. At the time our City was becoming aware of certain "targets of opportunity" having to do with commercial retail development and its positive fiscal impact. The Commission's concern at the time was that there would be an ever increasing number of developers who would want their property changed to commercial and that we would have no current information upon which to base our decisions and recommendations. Our fears have proved to be accurate. At this moment, at least six companies have approached the City and/or individual Council Members with such requests. Without current data, decisions concerning these requests will be made piecemeal in a vacuum rendering the General Plan process meaningless and, even worse, causing our City to give the appearance of giving preferential treatment to one individual or group over another. Many economic changes have occurred since our master plan was adopted in 1981. It is the desire of the Commission to take a flesh look at that document and the current economic basis upon which decision should or should not be made with respect to land use decisions. Questions that beg answers are: What commercial opportunities, amendments, and constraints influence commercial activity in the '90s? How much commercial land and development is beneficial to the City? What are the commercial shortfalls and leakages? What is the latest commercial !and absorption ability for the City in the next 5 to 10 years? What is the fiscal cost-benefit? Do changes in the economy create new assumptions and how do these assumptions affect !and use relationships for the future? To answer these and other questions affecting planning for economic development, the Commission proposes to conduct a comprehensive study of commercial !and use. Important to the completion of such a study is accomplishing a market analysis and fiscal component upon which all commercial land use decisions are to be made. We suggest that in order to do this, specialized expertise will be necessary to supplement the work of the planning staff It would appear that the very specialized market analysis and fiscal component will have to be done by a consultant. We have opportunities. We do not want to miss those opportunities. However, our City needs to make decisions in a logical manner--to once again be a "City with a plan." The Commission, therefore, respectfully requests that funding be provided for a commercial land use and market study. EDB:gs DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 13, 1994 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING: GENERAL PLAN, INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND COMMERCIAL LAND USE STUDY The City's original General Plan was adopted in 1980 and a technical update adopted in 1988. The plan has achieved most of the goals it set 14 years ago and, for the most part, individual amendments have allowed us to adjust and provide flexibility to handle unforeseen situations, possibilities, and opportunities. That is becoming increasingly awkward. There comes a time when the range and numbers of amendments make it necessary to initiate a comprehensive analysis to ensure the existence of viable documented policies which reflect changes in society and the marketplace. We have had, and expect to continue to have, requests for changes-- particularly regarding commercial land use. The City has attempted to respond to these perceived needs as they arise rather than considering the plan as a whole. It is our belief that it is in the best interest of the City and its citizens to initiate a comprehensive study to include existing commercial land use, current and projected trends, and planning considerations required to assure a viable and appropriate level of commercial development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Our belief is based on the following concerns: Times have changed and the analysis prepared in the 1980s is outdated. We may or may not want to be restricted to current designations, but land use designation needs to be based on sound land use decisions. A comprehensive General Plan related analysis of the amount of commercial land use performed in the late 1980s indicated too much land designated commercial in the City at that time, yet the amount of designated commercial land use within the City's General Plan has increased by 301 acres since 1987 for a total of 1,258 acres. Without a comprehensive review of commercial land use and proper planning, the development of new commercial sites will be driven solely by speculative land use considerations with potentially serious long term land use ramifications. We must evaluate impacts such as Air Quality Plan goals, transportltion, impacts on existing commercial land, et cetera. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager DISCUSSION OF REWARD PROGRAMS The City Council asked that an ad hoc committee of the Council discuss further with staff options for establishing a reward program. These rewards would be offered for information leading to the arrest and conviction of individuals involved in certain crimes in the community. Some time was given to discussing the option of forming a pool of surrounding communities to fund a reward program. After discussing this option, the conclusion was that Rancho Cucamonga would be better served by a program specific to our community. Further it was agreed that this should be a community effort and not just a City effort. To that end, it was proposed that a committee formed of individual residents and representatives from the business community be created to steer the formation of this program. This committee would raise funds for the reward program and would also organize an annual event to help build on the reward pool. This committee would also recommend guidelines that would be used to help decide when this reward should be offered. To help reduce unnecessary duplication, it was felt that WeTip should be used as the organization to help publicize the reward being offered and to accept any tips generated for the specific crime. WeTip could also be used to disburse the reward because they already have a well established mechanism in place for anonymously disbursing rewards. This program would provide for an extraordinary reward to help bring criminals to justice, involve the community in the fight against crime and provide some sensible guidelines to follow. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council direct staff to begin making contacts with community groups and the business community with a goal of establishing a reward committee. It is also recommended that the City Council appoint a Councilmember to serve on this committee. Respectfully Submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager /dab DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM April19,1995 Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager . William J. Alexander, May~/'Z c~' ROUTE 30 UPDATE At the April 1 lth Ad Hoc meeting, the committee wanted to reexamine several sections of the profile of the Route 30 project in detail. The Caltrans representative reviewed those portions of the "at grade-depressed" profile which is being proposed by Caltrans and SANBAG. In reviewing the profile the committee paid particular attention to the remaining elevated sections particularly, at the west City limits near Sapphire Street. The committee also discussed the sections near Rochester Avenue at length. After this review, it was the consensus of the committee that before accepting the profile more information about two areas of elevated profiles would be needed. The information requested for review are (1) the traffic and other impacts of placing an at-grade fleeway across Sapphire Street, cutting it off from 19th Street and (2) the cost and other impacts of lowering the profile several feet in the Rochester Avenue area, which would involve lowering Rochester Avenue, part of Highland Avenue and an 84" storm drain. With this information, consensus on the profile may be achieved at the May 9 meeting of the task force. The task force also reviewed the Ronte 15/30 interchange. A rendering was submitted by Caltmns showing how the interchange would appear to residents approximately a quarter mile from the freeway. At the next meeting an additional picture or rendering will be shown to depict the interchange from a different position. . The task force was in general agreement with the interchange design. The task force observed that any development in this area would be required to provide mitigation for noise and sound and prospective buyers would be clearly aware of the design of the freeway. The next scheduled meeting will be May 9th, 6:00 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Conference Room. WJA:Iy cc: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 19, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I ~7'~ AMENDMENT TO GUIDELINES Please note that the attached reflects a slight change to item D4 regarding the Policy for RCTV- 3. The change appears on line 2 of page 2 of the Policy. The word Deputy has been removed at the request of Councilmember Diane Williams. The sentence will now read, "The City Manager shall provide administrative direction over the cable television program." ·' ';' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Programming activities and program schedules for the Channel are the responsibility of the City Managers Office. The Oept~ City Manager shall provide administrative direction over the cable television program. The Cable Television Administrator, who shall be the City Manager or his designee, shall be responsible for the dally operation of the cable television division. The costs associated with the City's involvement in RCTV-3 will be paid for with the franchise fees/PEG Access fees received through the franchise agreement with any cable company franchised in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The revenue from the franchise fees is directed into the City's general fund in accordance with the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City may solicit and accept grants for operations or production of particular types of programming for RCTV-3, provided that the financial source shall not be involved in the content of the program, nor shall it advertise goods or services for profit. Programs supported by grants may bear the following statement at the conclusion of the program: "This program was underwritten by a grant from Programming Statement RCTV-3 will provide govemment-related information to the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga including, but not limited to, the function, activities, programs and issues of the City. Programming shall be informative, rather than advocative. The Channel is not intended to be used as an exclusive political or religious forum by any individual or group, nor as a mechanism for building support for a particular person, program or issue. The City Manager, or his designee, reserves the right to review all programs, proposed and completed, to determine compliance with Programming, Regulations and Channel Objectives. Programs under review may be accepted as presented, may be rejected, or may be given conditional approval. In the case of conditional approval, a program may be deemed appropriate and worthy, except for the stated objectionable or offensive portion which Will be listed as needing revision or deletion from the program. The copyright holder of the program will then have the option of making all specified changes or withdrawing the program from consideration altogether. It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to produce only govemment-related video programs, and community events that are either duly sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or have broad community appeal. The Cable Television Administrator shall review requests from the public or not-for-profit agencies for event coverage or video production. MEMO TO MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING GP, ISP, AND COMMCERCIAL LAND USE STUDY July 13, 1994 Page 2 Existing market studies do not consider the impacts of the recently approved commercially related uses within the Industrial Area Specific Plan or other proposals. Recent amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and changes on Foothill Boulevard will significantly change the character of those areas and will have an impact on fiscal, social, quality of life, and character issues. The revisiting of the commercial land use designations has repercussions on other land uses. The Industrial Area Specific Plan is only part of the overall need to evaluate and analyze our future potential. It is apparent to us that times have changed, that the current land use categories may not be adequate, that pressure to increase commercial land use designations will continue, and that decisions on land use designations must be based on sound planning in keeping with Rancho Cucamonga's long standing practice of excellence in community planning. We, therefore, strongly recommend that funds and staff resources be provided to complete a comprehensive commercial land use designation and utilization study. Respectfully submitted, Fox ~ha Oj~,a~sion (~BarkeU Chairman EDB/gs cc: Brad BuZler, City PZanner Rick Gomez, Community DeveZopment Director COMMERCIAL LAND USE AND MARKET STUDY April 19, 1995 Page 2 months from the date a contract is let. If, at the completion of this study, amendments are recommended to the General Plan and Foothill Boulevard and Industrial Area Specific Plans, staff could be directed to initiate those amendments. The time lines for amendments can vary depending on the specific sites and related issues to those sites. However, it is estimated that amendments can be accomplished within a 6-12 month process. Since no funds are budgeted for this work, the following recommendation is being made to accomplish the project. A budgeted Assistant Planner position was vacated during Fiscal Year 94/95. It is recommended that since this position has not been refilled, 94/95 funds from the salary savings be utilized to assist the planning staff in conducting the commercial land use study by retaining an outside consultant for the market analysis and fiscal component. Any General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments recommended by the study can be completed by staff. Cost to be allocated to this study is $50,000, $30,000 from Fiscal Year 94/95 Planning Division salary savings and $20,000 to be included in Fiscal Year 95/96 budget. The project will overlap both fiscal years. RECOMMENDATION: Approve allocation of up to $50,000 from account # 01-4333-1100, authorize planning staff and Planning Commission to prepare formal work program for the study, and authorize planning staff to prepare a Request for Qualifications for the market analysis and fiscal component. The entire program package, including all necessary contracts, will be submitted for subsequent City Council review and approval in June. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lain, AICP City Manager JL:ds Attachments: April 3, 1995 Memorandum from E. David Barker, Planning Commission Chairman projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Street Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $0.00 $130.00 $8,110.00 $130.00 $3.860.00 $12,230.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $710.00 $190.00 $900.00 Total Revenue Required: $13,130.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover $6.150.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $6.980.00 Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 95/96 not be increased. No new units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment Bate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $193.75. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 94/95. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ 1 .and Use Tvne U~ts Rate Factor A_U. Revenue Single Family Parcel ;~6.00 $193.75 I $193.75 $6.980.00 Total 36.00 $6.980.00 payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Street Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $4,380.00 $1,620.00 $200.00 $15,410.00 $320.00 $11.770.00 $33,700.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $4,840.00 $649.00 $5,489.00 Total Revenue Required: $39,189.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover <$18.599.00> Assessment Revenue Required: $20.590.00 The Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended in increase. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment R~te: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 94/95 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ l-and Use ~ U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 618.00 $33.32 I $33.32 $?0.590.00 Total 618.00 $?0.590.00 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET UGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO,S. I AND 6 CITY OF RANClIO CU4CAMONQA' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM N,~S. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CI~ OF RANGNO CU~MONQA COUNTY OF MN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP ~ 210-07|-37 Z APN - ~1 O 071 STREF_T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NT'~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r-up 93 -0~ I=XHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC). 3B STREET I-.I(~HTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. 1 AND 5 4 H~i Tprr_~ BASE LINE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIERRA VISTA BAPTIST DR 94-03 Resoluticra No. 94-148 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 8,'~tY y /F N 577. 7"48'1 .,y-- co,.4ut,vtrr 7'MIL. .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #6 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 June 15, 1994 MDR 94-03 2.65 A.U. July 20, 1994 CUP 93-17 1.02 A.U. Sept. 21, 1994 DR 93-20 2.99 A.U. Nov. 2, 1994 DR 94-03 3.87 A.U. Nov 2, 1994 CUP 94-03 4.23 A.U. Dec. 7, 1994 CUP 93-04 3.57 A.U. Dec 7, 1994 MDR 94-12 22.09A. U. Dec. 2 I, 1994 DR 94-06 18.66 A.U. Jan. 4, 1995 CUP 94-16 2.15 A.U. March 1, 1995 PM 14635 7.38 A.U. March 15, 1995 PM 14647 353.35 A.U. at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected mount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Salaries Fnnge Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Maintenance & Operations Subtotal: $6,560.00 $2,430.00 $2,500.00 $13,810.00 $570.00 $33.980.00 $59,850.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $6,400.00 $2.058.00 $8,458.00 Total Revenue Required: $68,308.00 Less: FY 94/95 Carryover <$9.558.00> Assessment Revenue Required: $58.750.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended to increase. FY 95/96 Assessment [late: For FY 95/96 the recommended rte per assessment unit is $51.40. This is the same as the rate of FY 94/95. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: U~t No. of Unit Rat~ Land Use Tvne U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Indstrial/Comm. Acre 1143.05 $51.40 1 $51.40 $58.750.00 Total $58,750.00 A tax delinquency mount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected mount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Capital Expenditures: Street Light Installation Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $4,380.00 $1,620.00 $12,780.00 $17,350.00 $670.00 $0.00 $27.330.00 $64,130.00 $9,330.00 $640.00 $9,970.00 $74,100.00 <$33.580.00> $40.520.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget and no new assessment units have been annexed into the district. It is recommended the asssessment rates for FY 95/96 not be increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. This is the same as the rate for FY 94/95. The following itemizes the asssessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rata I .and Use Type U~ts Rate Favor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1. 171.00 $34.60 1 $34.60 $40.520.00 Total 1,171.00 $40.520.00 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 4 ANNEXATION FOR FY 95/96 FEBRUARY 16, 1994 PM 14331 25.04AC 5O.08 AU tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~4 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $108,600.00 $1,780.00 $49.890.00 $160,270.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $19,140.00 $2.095.00 $21,235.00 Total Revenue Required: $181,505.00 Less: FY 94/95 Carryover $87.105.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $94.400.00 The Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 will remain at $28.96 per year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $28.96. This is the same as the rate for FY 94/95. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Tvne U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 147.33 $28.96 2 $57.92 $8,533.00 Single Family Parcel 1660.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $48,074.00 Multi-Family Unit 2610 $28.96 1 $28.96 $37.793.00 Total $94.400.00 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Admimstration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,810.00 $146.660.00 $148,470.00 $34,590.00 $4.308.00 $38,898.00 $187,368.00 $4,942.00 $192.310.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 have not been increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per asssessment unit is $47.15. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of 1 .and Use Tvoe U~ts Commercial Acre 95.86 Single Family Parcel 3763.00 Multi-Family Unit 124 Total $47.15 $47.15 $47.15 this is the same rate as FY 94/95. The Unit Rate/ Factor A.U. Revenue 2 $94.30 $9,040.00 1 $47.15 $177,424.00 I $47.15 $5.846.00 $192.310.00 E X HI81T · A · ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~A ~ C~Z_ AdA ~ PAv~ C~L ~ ~ 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 March 2, 1994 DR 92-11 1DU - 1AU November 16, 1994 PM 12877 2 DU - 2 AU Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0 $0 $0 $2,540.00 $206.030.00 $208,570.00 $47,760.00 $21.230.00 $68,990.00 $277,560.00 <$24.990.00> $252.570.00 Analysis: Assessment ratesfor FY95/96are not recommended to be increasedoverFY94/95 rates. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. following itemizes the assesssmear rate for the district: This is the same rate as FY 94/95. The Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use T_vpe U~ts Rate Factor A,U. Revenue Commercial Acre 11.55 $39.97 2 $79.94 $920.00 Single Family Parcel 5377.00 $39.97 1 $39.97 $214,918.00 Multi-Family Unit 919 $39.97 1 $39.97 $36.73?.00 Total $252.570.00 I EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N~S. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~" COUNTY OF SAN IERNARDINQ STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A · ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. 1 AND 6 ~A I~ C~L A ~OT ~IN~' AOJU~TM$NT NQ. ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP *"r' Z APN :3 210-071'37 APN - O 07| CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NT'~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~'-U P ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC). 38 STREET L-1(3HTING MAINTENANCE DISTFIICT NO S. I AND 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CU~ 9.d-c STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 '~ ~ 4 \ BASE LINE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIERRA VISTA BAPTIST DR 94-03 Resolutic~ No. 94-148 EXHIBIT 'a' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ -* LANDSCAPE MAINTENA. NCI~ 'DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~,4~ustrr T~t411, .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN 8ERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA c.~p .,3-/7 Resol~i~ ~.94~39 EXHIIIT 'A' ' '" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STRUT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 CITY 0F RANClIO C:UCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDRIO STATE OF CALWORNIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION FOR FY 95/96 February 16, 1994 PM 1433 1 25.04 AC 50.08 A.U. March 2, 1994 DR 92-11 I DU 1.00 A.U June 15, 1994 MDR 94-03 2.65 AC 5.30 A.U July 20, 1994 CUP 93-17 1.02 AC 2.04 A.U September 21, 1994 DR 93-20 2.98 AC 5.96 A.U. November 2, 1994 DR 94-03 3.87 AC 7.74 A.U. November 2, 1994 DR 94-04 88 DU 88.00 A.U. November 16, ' 1994 PM 12877 2 DU 2.00 A.U December 7, 1994 CUP 93-04 3.57 DU 7.14 A.U December 7, 1994 MDR94-21 22.09AC 44.18 A. U December 21, 1994 DR 94-06 18.66 AC 37.32 A.U January 4, 1995 CUP 94-16 2.15 AC 4.3 A.U March 1, ' 1995 PM 14635 7.38 AC 14.76 A.U March 15, 1995 PM 14647 353.35 AC706.7 A.U Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $17,200.00 $60,000.00 $4,680.00 $269.780.00 $351,660.00 $121,180.00 $14.339.00 $139,519.00 $487,179.00 <$52.969.00> $434.210.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended to be increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. This is the same rate as FY 94/95. following itemizes the assesssment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I .and Use Type U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 1,393.04 $17.77 2 $35.54 $49,508.00 Single Family Parcel 16,037.00 $17.77 1 $17.77 $284,977.00 Multi-Family Unit 5,612 $17.77 1 $17.77 $99.725.00 Total $434.210.00 The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 Report of Engineer: SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. TIME. AND PI .ACE OF HEARFNG: SECTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CMC CENTER DRIVE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. WEDNESDAY MAY 3, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND TIlE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITFEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. T.andscai~ir~ and T,ight n Act of 1977: SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and earfled through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the Stare of California desi~At,xl as the I studstaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of intention: SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the s~me to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cueamonga, California. /77 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS April 19, 1995 Page 2 There is no increase in rates in any of the districts for the Fiscal Year 1995/96. Therefore according to the Landscape and Lighting Act, we are not required to send any notification by mall individually to any property owner of this hearing. Hearing Notices were advertised in the newspaper. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I - Arterial The assessment rate is recommended to remain at $17.77 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryover funds will still be used to keep the rote fi'om increasing. However, these carryover funds will not be available in future years. Street I.ighting Maintenance District No. 2 - l .ocal The assessment rate is recommended to remain at $39.97 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district. However, these carryover funds may not be available in future years. Street l .i~,hting Maintenance District No. 3 - Victoria Planned Community The assessment rate will remain at $45.15 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Street l .i~.hting Maintenance District No. 4 - Term Vista Planned Comrnuni~ The assessment rate will remain at $28.96 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district. Street 1' i[,htin~, Maintenance r)istrict No. 5 - Caryn Planned Coromnni~ The assessment rate will remain at $34.60 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Street l .ightin~ M~intenance I')istrict No. 6 - Commercial/Industrial The assessment rate will remain at $51.40 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. Street I .it/htin~, Maintenance District No. 7 - North F. tiwanda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district, the rate will remain at $33.32 for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may E I I I 171 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contingency Tree Replacement Contract Service: Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation Imgation Upgrades to Central Control Capital Outlay / Vehicles Landscape Plant Material Replacement Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: $0 $0 $490.00 $370.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 $6,760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,630.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $190.00 $1,290.00 $80.00 $120.00 $22,430.00 $1,790.00 $190.00 $1,980.00 $24,410.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover _ <$8.060.00> Total Revenue Required: $16.350.00 For 95/96 the district budgeted $1,000 for landscape plant material replacement and $3,630 for 10% of a 1.5 ton truck with a 35 foot aerial tower. Analysis: The FY 95/96 rate of assessment is $151.45. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 94/95.. No new assessment umts have been annexed in the district. Proposed Maintenance Bud~zet for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures NE Community Park (Tot Lot, Ball Fields, and Picnic Areas) Capital Ou~ay/Vehicles Ca/sense Retrofit Landscape Plant Material Renovatins Genera/Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and Genera/Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 94/95 District Carryover . Total Revenue Required: $2,470.00 $910.00 $3,480.00 $1,330.00 $500.00 $71,280.00 $18,500.00 $442,470.00 $6,040.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,400.00 $16,000.00 $740.00 $500.00 $573,620.00 $28,030.00 $487.00 $28,517.00 $602,137.00 <$299.077.00> $303.060.00 For 95/96 the dislxict budgeted $5,000 for landscape plant material renovation and $3,000 Ca/sense retrofit. In addition, $442,470 has been budgeted for the future Northeast Park for the construction of a tot lot, ball fields and picnic areas. The Northeast Park site is located on East Avenue, just north of Summit Intermediate School which is located on the northeast comer of East Avenue and Summit Avenue. 1 I <~[ maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LIVID #6 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Reg. Vehicle Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditure Landscape Plant Material Renovation Capital Outlay/Vehicles Replace Concrete Fence Calsense Retrofit General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 94/95 District Carryover . Total Revenue Required: $7,400.00 $2,740.00 $8,430.00 $1,910.00 $500.00 $174,600.00 $10,500.00 $15,000.00 $3,150.00 $56,430.00 $3,180.00 $2,870.00 $60,000.00 $2,550.00 5700.00 $349,960.00 $27,650.00 $5.088.00 $32,738.00 $382,698.00 < $93.496..00> $289.?02.00 Analysis: The FY 95/96 rate of assessment is $246.97. It is recommended there be no increase ~'om FY94/95. Factors that attribute to this are a reduction in tax delinquency and payment of back taxes that include interest and penalties.. No new assessment units were annexed in the district. The tax delinquency represents the projected mount of unpaid taxes within the district. Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $0 $0 $530.00 $70.00 Contract Sentices Landscape Maintenance Capital Expenditures Tot Lot ADA Retrofit Tree, Shrub & Ground Cover Replacement Catsease Retrofit General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: $1,310.00 $7,510.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $30.00 $280.00 $130.00 $120.00 $15,480.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency $620.00 $90.00 $710.00 Gross Revenue Required $16,190.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover <$I1.~10.00> Total Revenue Required: $4.980.00 For 95/96 the district budgeted $7,510 for ADA (American's with Disabilities Act) to retrofit the tot lot; $5,000 for Catsease retrofits and $500 for Tree, shrub and ground cover replacement. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $113.29. It is recommended that there be no increase from FY 95/96. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rata. I .and Use Type U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 44 $113.29 1.0 $113.29 $4.980.00 EXI. IiSIT 'A · L.ANDsAS. SESSMENT DIAGRAM · CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC). 4 STREET lIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 4 I Illll 94-030 · · CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 ANNEXATIONS FOR FY 1995/96 February 16, 1994 PM 1433 1 25.04 A.U. Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995-96 Regular Payroll Overtime Pan Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Mileage Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Equipment Maintenance Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Terra Vista/Baseline Med. Renovation Capital Outlay / Projects Calsense Retrofit ADA Retrofit for Park Tot Lots Capital Outlay / Equipment Capital Outlay / Vehicles General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Subtotal Gross Revenue Required: Less: 94/95 District Carryover . Total Revenue Required: $252,160.00 $1,000.00 $3,720.00 $93,300.00 $52,660.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $227,460.00 $9,000.00 $374,000.00 $68,810.00 $40,000.00 $199,950.00 $34,600.00 $36,750.00 $5,540.00 $120,000.00 $20,000.00 $700.00 $1,572,650.00 $91,120.00 $3.022.00 $94,142.00 $1,666,792.00 <$611.80~.00> $1.054.990.00 For FY 95/96 the district budgeted $214,550 for ADA (American's with Disabilities Act) for a mandatory ADA study and to retrofit park tot lots. This will update the play equipment and surfacing in park tot lots. Also, $7,250 for replacement of Haven Median Landscape lights; $17,000 to regrade left field at Spruce Park; $15,000 for replacement of tree, shrub and ground cover throughout the district; $10,000 for improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation system; $40,000 for calsence retrofits and $960 for two irrigation remote controls. Under Capital Outlay for Vehicles, $36,750 has been budgeted for 35% of 6 - 1/2 ton pickups with utility bodies. These vehicles will be used for PROJECT: ----i AnN 209-272-01,04,07 AND 08; .~.R._T... / 210-081-22 AND 2.3; 210-082-02, /__, f I 1,17,37,.~8 AND 39; AbI'D , : I · 210-361-01 THRU 26 I /~ --, . - '="'~ 9 ',,as., ~ ' ..... ~ "1 l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P.M. NIl. 14647 fi.D. c,(lr .F COT TR~I~. I~L"~T.T .OPMlrNT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 // A.T. & S.F. RfR. (METROLINK) 6TH STREET L PROJECT SITE 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE APN 229-283-12 FOUETH STI~rF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I,I.T. 5. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CUP 9,~-16 ,~- 5'T'faee'l"' 0 - e..-r-~ .,~--'~e6T- 0 0 0 0 CII"f OF -.ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~r~IG DIVIMION ORDERING ANNEXATION N I~: 1[ M I M~X~. A.$SF_.S.f~IENT DIAGRAM ,MAP /,-/0 -a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~' 4f T'H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 35 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 "", r'- I-. APN ZOf-144-80 2.~8~ N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OFt CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A · ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. ! AND 5 94-116 P.M. NO. P.M.B. J0~/4 3.18 AC. CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN IIRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3b are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Rag Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance -Parkways & Medians Tree Maintenance Landscape Maintenance - Sports Complex Capital Expenditures General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: $85,300.00 $31,560.00 $23,100.00 $1,030.00 0 $167,130.00 $30,000.00 $10,800.00 0 $4,860.00 $132,000.00 $81,200.00 1.000.00 $567,980.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquecy $39,990.00 $19.340.00 Subtotal: $59,330.00 Gross Revenue Required: $627,310.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover <$148.140.00> Total Revenue Required: $479.170.00 Analysis: It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $352.80 for the fiscal year 1995/96. The tax delinquency represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. FY 95/96 Assessment l~ite: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ I .and Use Tvoe U~ts Rate Factor A.U. Comm/Ind Acre 1358.19 $352.80 1.0 $352.80 Other Revenue: User Fees from Sports Field Lighting Revenue $479,170 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Tree and Shrub Replacement Calsence Retro~tt General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $270.00 $0.00 $2,200.00 $700.00 $5,600.00 $40.00 $600.00 $120.00 $9,530.00 $310.00 $~30.00 $540.00 Gross Revenue Required: $10,070.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover _ <$6.760.00> Total Revenue Required: $3.310.00 For 95/96 the district budgeted $700.00 for tree and shrub replacement and $5,600.00 for Calsence Retrofit. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted in 95/96. Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rate for LMD #3a remain at $413.74 for the FY95/96 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. The tax delinquency represents the estimated mount of unpaid taxes within the district. No new assessments were annexed into the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit I .and Use Type ],~lits Rate Factor Industrial Parcel 8 $413.74 1.0 A.U. Revenue $413.74 $3.310.00 l Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain imgation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the Ci~s Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Overtime Salaries Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Equipment Maintenance Mileage Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Capital Improvement Projects Capital Vehicle Outlay Capital Equipment Outlay Capital Outlay./Building Improvement General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: $385,750.00 $5,000.00 $5,580.00 $142,730.00 $62,930.00 $10,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $651,090.00 $10,000,00 $126,230.00 $17,750.00 $13,600.00 $2,000.00 $12,270.00. $324,170.00 $20,000.00 $700.00 $1,792,800.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $145,190.00 $47.824.00 $193,014.00 Total Revenue Required: $1,985,814.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover <$277,754.00> Assessment Revenue Required $1.708.060.00 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 G k"X/,S'7:'. ,~'/'~F,~'T T/E'e 7 .~'.,/. CITY OF FIANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,:/1//12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA //? EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDat, APE MAINTENANCE DI~TFIICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IlOS. I AND 2 94--039 -:>age 3 $TATE OF CALIFORNIA -t dj;Wt-////7 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT # 1 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 March 2, 1994 DR 92-11 Single Family - 1DU -IAU November 2, 1994 DR 94-04 Multi-Family 88DU - 44 AU November 16, 1994 PM 12877 Single Family - 2DU - 2AU December 1994 Amber Lane Area Only 1456 square feet of non_turf certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and AppliCation Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Other Maintenance Services Tree Inventory Field Data Collection Capital Expenditures Soccer Field Renovation Tree Shrub & Ground Cover Replacement Calsense Retrofits Mandatory ADA Study/Implementation for Parks Slurry Seal & Restripe Parking Lots - Beryl, Church & Old Town Parks Capital/Equipment Outlay Capital/Playground Equipment Ou~ay - Parks Capital Vehicles Outlay General Liability Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 94/95 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $52,910.00 $19,580.00 $39,680.00 $16,310.00 $1,000.00 $276,160.00 $156,300.00 $12,000.00 $18,000.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $151,250.00 $9,700.00 $7,000.00 $960.00 $10,000.00 $26,010.00 $8,180.00 $141,750.00 $200.00 $42.000.00 $1.010.990.00 $114,350.00 $36.464.00 $150,814.00 $1,161,804.00 <$250,374.00> $911.430.00 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS April 19, 1995 Page 2 Report of Engineer: ~' c! SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the/hnnual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. TIME AND PI.ACE OF HEARING: SECTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. l,andscaping and I,ighting Act of 1977: SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention: SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, andthe City Clerk shall cause the same to be published I 0 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /lo CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS April 19, 1995 Page 2 Cucamonga County Waster District (CCWD) will not be increasing its water rates in the first half of the FY 95/96 but there may be an increase in January of 1996. This is due to the fact that CCWD is in the middle of a water conservation study and the results will not be available until later on in the v~r Ifth~r~ E! lemmmaemalll~' " . E' I ~.~ ~.a · ~ mmmmI ~ ,' FT'I ,.m. r,. ' r"~'"l Iram' ~"~"' ', m , i~"~ , I'~sg~o~, "', > m ~ ;.~.. . , .T..,~,,,'.,,,,.,,,,.. ....' ', -=I ~ ;'-' ",:":',;'v..',',.',',",",",",".' ""'" ~ , ~.,;,, F='T ;',, ', ,, ,, . ',:lee, ,~ ', ,, FT'"I ',, , example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size Range Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 acres and 1.51 to 3.5 acres and 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & larger and 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. All properties currently tax exempt; All public ownerships; Railroad mareline rights-of-way; Major utility transmission rights-of-way; Mineral rights; Parcels so small they curren~y cannot be built upon; , .All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception offand east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bemardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a pan hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading planting irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2.The construction of Red Frdl Community Park including but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewaik.~, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. D, The assessment rate for the 94/95 FY is $52.00, this rate will not increase for the 95/96 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the districts maintenance and operation expenses for the 95/96 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering de~cks in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. CITIY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PD-85 April 19, 1995 Page 2 Report of Engineer: SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. TIME AND PI.ACE OF HEARING: SECTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITYEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. l,andscal~ing and l,ightinl, Act of 197:~: SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislantre of the State of Califomia designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia. Publication of Resolution of Intention: SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. q? CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PD-85 April 19, 1995 Page 2 the City including PD-85 and will directly affect the operating expenses of this district. There is sufficient capital within the district's operating budgets this year to absorb the rate increase from CCWD without increasing the assessment rate. This is because of water conservation efforts by the City such as Calsense, moisture sensors, last year's wet winter and mild summer, lower tax delinquency rates and district carryovers. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 1995/96. The assessment rate increased from $35.00 to $52.00 during the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate will remain at $52.00 for the 1994/95 Fiscal Year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Single Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and Larger Respectfully submitted, William J. O~Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:dlw Attachments: Resolutions Preliminary Engineer's Report Assessment per Parcel $52.00 $26.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 PROJECT: EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16 APN 229-131-03 STREET LIGHTS:* Dist. S1 S6 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.0001, 22.0001, 27.5001. LANDSCAPING:* Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Tuff Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. * Off-site improvements deferred at this time. improvement plan approval. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units B,y District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B N/A 19.42 38.84 38.84 38.84 New work program to be submitted upon Form Date 11/16/94 t AMF..-RIIN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINI~'TRING DIVISION l i 6th ST N VICINITY 7~ SLIAJAdlr HI~H~MNZ~ 'R iBSGS- g rO - /O ~ V~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~rNG DI'v'NION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 13565-5 THRU 13565-10 April 5, 1995 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully su bm it"ted. William J. O'Neil CiD' Engineer WJO:WV Attachments PROPERTY OWNERS. AS JOINT TENANTS: RAFAELA ETAL MORALES RICARDO THOMAS YNOSTROZA ROSINA MENDEZ RACHEL MARTINEZ RAYMOND YNOSTROZA ROSEMARY YNOSTROZA ADELA SANTA MARIA ESTER GOMEZ JOAQUIN GOMEZ JOSE CARRILLO HELENA GONZALES TERRIE JESSIE VASQUEZ LUIS FRANCISCO MORALES MARGARITA HERNANDEZ RITA MURO SOFIA GONZALES CHRISTINA HURTADO MAGDALENA MORENO JOSEPHINA GOMEZ EXHIBIT "B" PARCEL "B" L.L.A NO. 382 PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1 FLOOD INUNDATION RIGHTS SKETCH PARCEL PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 LOT UNE REMOVE PER L.LA. ~582 T"--,~ . ,>~.....-..~.::I.~"'--,~,, --- -.; "-,,.:,.~.~!i!i!!i"':~iiii!i~ ~ "'-,, '~ I L28 PARC EL 11 i PARCEL 10 PARCEL 9 i c4 ~ "'- · ---I", ' -' C2 ~ L45 ~,e27 50 L41 ,,:.::::_::,;::::_:;?-,E: ::__;: :~13 TACOMADRIVE PARCEL 12 SCALE:: 1'-100' AREA TO BE VACATED CURVE TABLE CURVE ARC DRTA RADIUS TAN tFNGTH C'I '122.70' 10'51'56" 647.00 6'1.54' C2 126.53' 10'54'~0~ 665.00 53.46' C4 14.81' ' ' 665.00 7.41' TANGENT t INIE BrNtIN I 95 S 0C00'~ I 96 S 89'59'0: W I 77 S 00'00'54 I ~8 S 89.59'(] W t.30 S W L31 N 00'00'5 L32 N 58'17'5 1_33 N 89'59'0 1.34 S 58'19'2 I ~9 S 89'59'C L40 N 00'00'5 L41 N 89'59°0 L42 S 00'00'5, L43 S 89'59'C L44 N 12'11'3~ L4.5 N 89'59'0 L47 S · L4.9 S ' 1.56 S 58'19'22 PARCEL 8 TABLES 61.00 69.00 61.00 87.56 20.00 87.56 117.00 18.00 117.00 18.00 121.19 18.00 121.19 18.00 61.00 10,00 87.56' V-133 EXISTING INUNDATION AREAS PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 LOT UNE REMOVE PER LLA. _.,,~.~'~-.qi .,. _} . P~ I~N$1'. NO. 04.--3880~2--m PARCEL 12 PARC,':L 11 a PARCEL 10 PARCEL 9 ~ c4. ~ "-- ¢2 I L4~ _ ,,-m, I,~Z~Z-~L41 ~2~~~11~ ..,L'Z','__.._ZEi_~j , c.3 TACOMA DRIVE (t.." PARCEL 3 PARCEL 8 L., SCAI& 1'e100' CuR, Ve_I C1 C2 CURVE TABLE L,~ L4' L4.~ ~7 II 0 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $394,310 $ 33,890 $ 0 $428,200 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX $14,670 PER ACRE $ 0 $ 4,320 $432,503 $436,823 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 93-3 April 19, 1995 Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax. and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William j. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of April, 1995. Executed this 19th day of April, 1995, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $1,749,980 $ 106,850 $ 130.190 $1,987,020 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $297.48 PER ACRE $ 10,890 $ 25,OOO $ 951,130 $1.000.000 $1,987,020 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84-1 April 19, 1995 Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due. opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I. DEBRA d. ADAMS, CITY CLERK, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of April, 1995. Executed this 19th day of April, 1995, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Taxing Classification E. Residential Class V (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * F. Residential Class VI (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * G. Commercial or industrial property Tax Rate $349 per year $245 per year $2,030 per acre per year ** , UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,526 per acre per year *** The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX "A" Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A' revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"). The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax 'A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax 'A' levy is to be established (the "Required Special Tax "A" Revenue"}. STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A' Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax 'A' rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) April 19, 1995 Page 2 SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 4/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) April 19, 1995 Page 2 are received by the City, the funds are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Respectfully submitted, , ARabm~isC~n~e~ces Director RCD:IYB:jmf Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA * 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR/VE * P.O. BOX 807 * RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA * 91729 RCTV-3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL CHANNEL 3 MESSAGE DISPLAY REQUEST Instructions: Please fill in the area below with the message as you would like it to appear on the Channel 3 Community Events Calendar. Print one character per space, and allow appropriate space for punctuation. All messages are subject to editing and condensation. Please read the Guidelines printed on the back of this sheet. DATE SUBMITTED: DISPLAY THIS MESSAGE FROM TO ORGANIZATION: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: Submit this form to our office no later than one week prior to the message's scheduled start date. Our FAX number is 909-948-1648 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 12 Public Records Any materials submitted may be subject to disclosure as a public record. Due consideration should be given prior to the submission of sensitive material. All program schedules, playback logs, equipment requests and air time requests will be made part of the public record and may be viewed by anyone during the normal business hours of the City. Materials may be viewed in a designated place only. Duplicate copies of any material may be purchased at a purchase price in accordance with the provisions of the California Public Records Act. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 10 facilities and other disciplinary action as provided in the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations. Use of equipment for personal, commercial or any other non-government related purposes will not be allowed. Applicants will not be authorized to use any RCTV-3 equipment to tape an event or program already being covered by the RCTV-3 staff. Moreover, the RCTV-3 produced program will take precedence for air time on RCTV-3. Approval of all equipment requests are subject to equipment availability. Emergencies, unforeseen complications, equipment failure, and official City business may necessitate cancellation of equipment usage rights at any time. Completed programs will be screened for compliance with Channel objectives and City policies, and for technical quality. Use of equipment and facilities to produce a program will not guarantee the program air time on RCTV-3. The program may be accepted as presented, denied completely, or given conditional approval, the program copyright holder may make specified changes in order to bring the program into compliance, or may withdraw the program from consideration altogether. Copies of copyright materials shall not be made except with written approval from the copyright holder. It shall be the responsibility of the requesting department to obtain such written permissions and provide proof of such. 10. The Cable Television Administrator will decide equipment usage request in accordance with Section C of this policy on a case by case basis. Air time Request Procedures Air time on RCTV-3 may be requested for a pre-produced program or series, providing the program is suitable for airing on the Channel. To submit a program for consideration, applicant is required to fill out an Air Time Request Form, describing program title, topic, format, and nmning time. The Air Time Request Form, the program and any other materials must be submitted to the Cable Television Administrator. 3. The program shall be screened for Channel suitability, compliance with Channel CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 8 Event 1. e. Announcements submitted by other agencies Coverage Procedures To request coverage of an event by the Cable staff, the appropriate City department representative must fill out and submit a Video Project Request Form. The request must be approved by the City Manager. Applicant will be required to provide the name, date, location and purpose of the event. Also required will be details regarding what the taping crew will need to know in advance about the location, activity, crowd, etc. The event must be appropriate to the channel objectives. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all on-site approvals and off-site permission for taping. This includes permission from property or business owners, performers, event coordinators, etc. Approvals shall be submitted to the Cable Television Administrator, along with the Project Request Form. It will be the applicant's responsibility to pay any extra costs incurred by the production including, but not limited to, all admittance fees, additional props and sets, talent costs, copyright fees, artwork and graphics, union or other professional association fees, clearance fees, royalties and permission fees. City departments will also be required to submit a budget for projects to the City Manager. The Project Request Form shall be submitted a minimum of two (2) months prior to the scheduled event, with priority being given to projects planned and booked in the previous budget year. Requests from any City Department must be approved by the appropriate Department head. The Cable Television Administrator will consider each request based on the following: a. Compliance with City policies b. Availability of staff c. Availability of equipment and facilities CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 6 Cucamonga. F. Satellite Receptions Programming suitable for retransmission may be obtained through satellite reception. Programs to be retransmitted shall meet all requirements of these regulations for suitability that apply to locally produced programming. Satellite receptions may be videotaped for later broadcast or for use by City departments in training programs. In all cases, the City shall observe all applicable rules concerning copyright infringement. Channel Access Access to RCTV-3 facilities and air time is open to all City departments upon written permission granted by the City Manager. All other government agencies granted access to RCTV-3 facilities shall be required to cover all expenses for the use of equipment and facilities. Scheduling priority will be governed by the Cable Television Administrator. RCTV-3 is a Municipal Access Channel, open to various City government departments for the dissemination of government-related information to the viewing public. Access to the Channel may range from submitting a public service announcement for the Character Generator service, to requests for event coverage, to working side by side with the RCTV-3 Cable Administration staff to produce a program or program series. In each case, proper procedures must be followed before access will be provided. A. Character Generator Procedure A Character Generator is a computer-based alpha-numeric system used to convey information in a visual medium. , All City departments, agencies and organizations may submit public service messages to be displayed in character form on RCTV-3 during non- programming hours. All messages must be typewritten or printed legibly and must be submitted the Tuesday prior to the requested start date. Forms for this service are available at City Hail, Lions Community Center, the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. No announcements will be taken over the telephone, except in the case of an emergency. Messages submitted by a City department must be approved by the appropriate Department head. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 4 d. Illegal programming, prohibited by applicable Federal, State or local laws. An event that is not sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or does not have broad community appeal. Political Broadcasts Declared candidates for any elective public office and persons advocating any cause, viewpoint or policy, proposed or otherwise, will not be eligible to appear on RCTV-3, except in a program or series where the format allows for all candidates or sides of an issue to be heard on an equal basis. A person is deemed to be a candidate for public office from the time that person announces the intention to nm for nomination for public office. Candidates for public office may appear on RCTV-3 on a bona fide news program/documentary if the appearance of the candidate is incidental to presentation of the subject matter, or in coverage of official City events or presentation of City projects. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will make every effort to ensure that any appearance by any qualified political candidate on RCTV-3 will abide by these restrictions and will tailor such appearances to minimize the fact of one's candidacy. Decisions on allowable program formats and appearances by qualified political candidates will be made by the City Manager. Programming by any other govemmental group, individual or entity which is not an official branch of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will not be allowed, unless the event or program to be taped is sponsored/co-sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or benefits the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Recognizing that the operations of RCTV-3 are funded by the cable television customers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City may require payment of all expenses of production/programming by other govemmental agencies should RCTV-3 Cable Administration staff be asked to produce programming for any other public, private, or not-for-profit agency. Fees for such purpose may be developed by the City under the cost allocation user fee program. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CABLE CHANNEL 3 PAGE 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Programming activities and program schedules for the Channel are the responsibility of the City Manager's Office. The Deputy City Manager shall provide administrative direction over the cable television program. The Cable Television Administrator, who shall be the City Manager or his designee, shall be responsible for the daily operation of the cable television division. The costs associated with the City's involvement in RCTV-3 will be paid for with the franchise fees/PEG Access fees received through the franchise agreement with any cable company franchised in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The revenue from the franchise fees is directed into the City's general fund in accordance with the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City may solicit and accept grants for operations or production of particular types of programming for RCTV-3, provided that the financial source shall not be involved in the content of the program, nor shall it advertise goods or services for profit. Programs supported by grants may bear the following statement at the conclusion of the program: "This program was underwritten by a grant from Programming Statement RCTV-3 will provide government-related information to the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga including, but not limited to, the function, activities, programs and issues of the City. Programming shall be informative, rather than advocative. The Channel is not intended to be used as an exclusive political or religious forum by any individual or group, nor as a mechanism for building support for a particular person, program or issue. The City Manager, or his designee, reserves the right to review all programs, proposed and completed, to determine compliance with Programming, Regulations and Channel Objectives. Programs under review may be accepted as presented, may be rejected, or may be given conditional approval. In the case of conditional approval, a program may be deemed appropriate and worthy, except for the stated objectionable or offensive portion which will be listed as needing revision or deletion from the program. The copyright holder of the program will then have the option of making all specified changes or withdrawing the program from consideration altogether. It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to produce only govemment-related video programs, and community events that are either duly sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or have broad community appeal. The Cable Television Administrator shall review requests from the public or not-for-profit agencies for event coverage or video production. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of April 1995. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, this 19th day of April 1995. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 26 and May 3, 1995 Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work d.on.e under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro- v~smns of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as mended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D, When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as mended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more 04/11/1995 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAHONGA PORTFOLIO HAST~ INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE H~R~ 1, 1995 - MARC!I 31, 1995 CITY CASR STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/~TURITIU T!Q~E I~T)IENT # ISSUE]{ RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHI)RAWALS BALANCE S!{ALL ~SINF. SS ADMINISTRATION TOTALS BEGINNING BAL.a. NCE: BEGINNING B~,LANCE: 1,101,562.50 1,101,562.50 $ 47,367,589.09 3,872,921.00 3,906,788.61 47,333,721.48 /7 04/11/1995 CITY OF RANCHO ~CAMONGA INVESTNERT PORTFOLIO DETAIL~ MAR~ 31, 1995 CITY CASH INVESTMIUFr PURCHASE STATED --- YTN --- MATURITY DAYS {ER ISSUER DATE B(X)K VALUE FACE VALUE MAILKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE ~ MAT CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOT~ CASH and INVESTMENTS 256,097.24 2.000 1.973 2.000 78,323.57 $ 334,420.81 $ 47,412,045.05 04/11/1995 CITY OF RANC~O I~VESTMENT PO[~FOLIO DETAILS = IF/ESTME]~S MA~C~ 31, 1995 CITY I~ESTMENT PU]~ASE STATED --- Y~4 --= ~TURITY DAYS ~[[~E~ I~U~ DATE ~ VALOE FACE V~DE ~ V~E ~TE 360 365 DATE ~ ~T CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00929 BANK OF AMERICA 01/31/95 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 2.800 2.800 2.839 04/04/95 3 00934 BAJiK OF AMERICA 03/02/95 127,921.00 127,921.00 127,921.00 2.800 2.800 2.839 04/03/95 2 00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.600 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 135 00918 GREAT WESTEIUi 11/15/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 11/27/95 240 00927 GREAT WESTEPa 01/25/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 01/25/96 299 00930 GREAT WESTERN 02/15/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 08/16/96 503 00931 GREAT WESTERN 03/01/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.250 6.250 6.337 03/04/96 338 00932 GREAT WESTEPa 02/23/95 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6.750 6.750 6.844 08/21/95 142 00936 GREAT WESTEPJ{ 03/29/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.800 5.800 5.881 09/25/95 177 00894 SAJ{WA 04/29/94 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.250 4.250 4.309 05/02/95 31 00924 SANWA 12/28/94 1,0(M),000.00 1,(N)0,000.00 1,000,000.00 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 636 00933 SANWA 02/23/95 500,000.00 54)0,000.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 695 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 11,419,566.50 11,419,566.50 11,419,566.50 5.240 5.312 203 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 17,385,038.78 17,385,038.78 17,385,038.78 5.779 5.700 5.779 1 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 5.528 5.452 5.528 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 18,498,038.78 18,498,038.78 18,498,038.78 5.685 5.764 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00895 00896 00897 00922 00925 00921 00926 00935 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/29/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 12/19/94 12/28/94 12/21/94 12/29/94 03/22/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 5.850 04/29/96 394 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.160 5.089 5.160 05/01/95 30 1,996,250.00 2,000,0(0).00 1,996,250.00 5.850 5.870 5.952 04/29/96 394 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 8.030 8.030 8.142 12/19/97 993 1,065,134.38 1,090,000.00 1,065,134.38 6.360 7.789 7.898 09/19/96 537 1,981,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,981,250.00 7.050 7.564 7.669 10/10/96 558 1,998,125.00 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 7.700 7.752 7.859 12/10/96 619 500,0(N).00 5(M),000.00 500,000.00 7.010 7.010 7.107 03/21/97 720 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 12,040,759.38 12,090,000.00 12,040,759.38 6.744 6.837 489 TREASURY SECq3RITIES - COUPON 00903 TREASURY NOTE 06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.569 6.660 08/31/97 883 ~URY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00892 TREASURY BILL 00907 TREASURY BILL 04/13/94 06/30/94 1,913,085.56 2,000,000.00 1,998,786.11 4.370 4.518 4.581 04/06/95 5 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,496,123.10 5.040 5.242 5.314 06/29/95 89 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 3,350,881.16 3,515,000.00 3,494,909.21 4.829 4.896 41 /S A Z ':~ · el.- IX vJ U~') "" (" (- r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I1 tlt II I III I1 I. I n II ,m It ~i m n m m m ,m n II i~ ,.._ j 9® t I I · · · · · · · I I · I · · · · I · I I · · · I · · I · · · · · · I · · · · · I I~1 i,~,1 I · I · I I · I · I · · · I · · · I · IZl · I i~,1 131 · · · · I I I I · I · · I · · I · · · · · I I · I I I · · I · I I I · ! · I · I~-~1 INI iv,~l IC~I I · I I I · · · I I · I · I · · · · · · · I · · · I · · · · · · · · · · I I I · · I I I · I I · I I · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I I I IZ'I · · IC21 I · j ( I- I ~,.)121~ I Ggf~ ~.J · · · · Z~ ZZ ZZWZ ZZlZlZZZZZzZZ/OO