HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/09/15 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
September 15, 1999
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J..Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane, Councilmember'
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office:: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
1. Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander ....... Biane .......
Curatalo ...... Dutton ~, and Williams.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a Proclamation to the Alta Loma Little League Senio~r
Division congratulating the team on becoming the District 2:1 and
Sectional 6 Champions.
Presentation of a Proclamation, to the Alta Loma Little League Junior
Division, congratulating the team on becoming the District 21
Champions..
3. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Big League Division
congratulating the team on becoming the District 21 Champions.
4. Rancho Cucamonga Police Department National Night Out
Presentation and Contest Winners.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIiC:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a s.ubsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
Approval of Minutes: August 18, 1999
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/25199 and 9/1/99 and Payroll
ending 8/29t99, for the total amount of $2,479,858.66.
Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of
August 31, 1999.
12
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
:.
Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for
Buddies, Lawrence P, Guarnierii, N&L Nilar Corp. 8153 Aspen Ave.
Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application, for On-Sale Beer and
Wine for No,. 1 Again Restaurant, Tongshen Chen & Mei Ling Wang,
8270 Foothiill Blvd.
Approval o.f Sheriffs Fiscal: Year 1999-2000 Schedule "A.."
Approval of a Resolution adopting the Fi;ve~Year Capital
Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 199,9/00 through 2003/04 and
Twenty-Year Transportation Plan beginning in Fiscal Year 1999100
as required for Measure I funds and approval of a Resolution
amending the Five-Year Capita. I Improvement Program for F:iscal
Year 1998/9.9 through 2002/03.
RESOLUTION NO.. 99-201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEARS 1999/00 THROUGH 2003/04
AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 1999/00
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "r'
FUNDS
RFSOLUTION NO. 99-202:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEARS 1998/99 THROUGH 2002/03
Approval of a Resolution Ordering the Vacation of the south 33 feet
of Victoria Street fronting the northerly boundary of Tentative Tract
15915 west of Etiwanda Avenue.
REoOL. UTION NO. 99-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED
THE SOUTH 33 FEET OF VICTORIA STREET
FRONTING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
TENTATIVE TRACT 15915 WEST OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE
Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security'
for CUP 97-03, located at the southwest corner of San Bernardino
Road and Red Hill Country Club, submitted by Ralph Olivas.
17
19
21
29
31
36
40
45
48
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
10.
11.
RESOLUTION NO. 9'9-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT' AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FC)R CUP' 97-03
Approval of Map and Ordering the Ann;exation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15268, located at the northeast corner
of Elm Ave. and White Birch Drive, submitted by Smith Associates.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVI!N'G PARCEL.. MAP
NUMBER 15268,
RESOLUTION NO. 99-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY C).F RANCHO CUCAMIONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
O,F CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDS.CAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS... 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15268
Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security
and Orderin9 the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.
2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 a~nd 2 for Tract
15915, located south of Victoria Street west of Etiwanda Avenue,
submitted by Woodside Homes of California, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 15915, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO, 99-208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE: DISTRICT
NOS. 1. AND 3 FOR TRACT 15915
49
51
53
54
57
60
61
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
12.
13.
114.
15.
Approval of a contract with Brown, Diven, Hessell & Brewer, LLP
(CO 99-079) for legal services in an amount not to exceed $8,250
($7,500 plus 10% contingency) in connection with the dissolution of
Community Facilities District 91-1 and Improvement Area: No. 1, to
be funded from Trust Fund Account No. 70-276-522, established by
developer funds specifically for CFD 91-1.
Approval of a Resolution of Consideration initiating proceedings to
dissolve Community Facilities District 91-1, to terminate the authority
to levy associated taxes within the District boundaries and to set the
time and date for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO, 99-209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
THE L, EGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTR~CT 91-1 (VICTORIA
COMMUNITY') OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA,, TO TERMINATE THE
AUTHORITY' TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES
WITHIN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT
Approval of a Resolution of Consideration initiating proceedings to
dissolve Improvement Area No. t of Community Faci~lities District 91-
1, to terminate the aut:hority to levy associated taxes within the
District boundaries,. and to set the time and date for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-210
A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (VICTORIA
COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, TO TERMINATE THE
AUTHORITY TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES
WITHIN IMPROVEMENT' AREA NO. 1 OF
SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTR~CT'
Approval to authorize the City Engineer to enter into an A9reement
with Associated Engineers, Inc. (CO 99-080),, and Norris-Re.pke, Inc.
(CO 99-081) for public works construction inspection services in the
amount of $40,000 for each firm to be funded from Accts. 01-4641-
6028 and 10-4637-6028.
64
65
68
70
73
75
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
16'.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Approval to appropriate $8.5,595 from Fund 46, award and authorize
the execution of the contract for the Adult Sports Complex Soccer
Fields Rehabilitation Project to the lowest bidder, Opt:i-Gro (CO 99-
082:) of Highland, California, in the amount of $155,595 ($141,450
plus 10% contingency) for the installation of new hybrid bermuda
grass sod o.n the two soccer fields at the Adult Sports Complex, to be
funded from Fund 46 Appropriation ($85,595) and Fund 46-4t30-
9929 ($70,000).
Approval to appropriate $28,410 to Account 74-4225-3950 and
authorize execution of a contract for the purchase of a Replacement
Fuel Management System from Milligan & Sons, Inc., (CO 99-08.3) in
an amount not to exceed $28,410 ($25,822 plus 10% contingency).
Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with SB&O, Inc. (CO
99-084) to provide Topographical Design Survey for proposed street
improvements for eight different locations (see Vicinity Map)
throughout the City', to be funded from the following account
numbers: 10-4637-9907 Milliken ($5,005); 10-4637-9906 Base Line
($2,69.5); 32-4637-9928 Arrow (15880); 10-4637-9314 Carnelian
($4,015); 10-4637-9904 6th Street - Haven to Milliken ($4,950); 10-
4637-9905 6th Street -Milliken to Hyssop (156,325); 10-4637-9903 8th
Street ($3,960); and 22-4637-9511 Eftwanda ($5,049).
Approval to authorize the execution of a Lease Renewal Agreement
(CO 99-085) for temporary debris storage on Caltrans Property at
Beryl and Highliand Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-2111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'I"Y COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LEASE
RENEWAL AGREEMENT WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcet
Map 14022, located on the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Lewis Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 14022,
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
76
78
8O
82
83
84
86
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
20.
Approval to accept the Windrows Park and Paseo Walkway Lighting
Project, Contract No. 99-045, as complete, release the Bonds and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract amount of $201,188.80.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR WINDROWS PARK
AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING PROJECT,
CONTRACT NO. 99-045 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
87
88
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will, read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCH()
CUCAMONGA - A request to require wireless communication
providers to install facilities that would not interfere with the City's
800 MHZ public safety radio communications system.
ORDINANCE NO. 609 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 99-03, AMENDING TITLE
t7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A SECTION
TO CHAPTER 17.26, ESTABLISHING
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPLICABLE
TO' WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES.
89
97
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDIN.ANCE REGARDING THE CITY
SEAL AND LOGO
ORDINANCE NO. 610 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE CITY SEAL
AND LOGO AND AMENDING THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
99
101
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony',
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
¸.
CONSIDERATION OF: A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK
AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE SITE FOR
AN OFF-LEASH DOG AREA IN THE CITY AND' THE PROPOSED
TERMS OF AGREEMENT WITH THE FRIENDS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA POOCH PARK
103
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. REPORT ON NEW HIGH SCHOOL AT MILLIKEN & BANYAN
2. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES, UPDATE
A. PARK AND FACILITIES UPDATE
1. Etiwanda Creek Park
2. Central Park
3. Windrows Park
4. Ellena Park
5.. Bear Gulch Park
6. Church Street Park
7. Various Parks
8. Lions West Community Center
9. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center
Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park
119
120
City Council Agenda
September 15, 1999
COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Boxing
5. Youth Sports
6. RC Family Sports Center
7. Adult Sports
8. Trips and Tours
9. Human Services
10. Facilities
11. Contract Classes
12. Community Wide Special Events
13. Ranch Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy
14. Park and Recreation Commission
15. Ranch() Cucamonga Community Foundation
16. Epicenter
122
J. IDENTIFICATIO,N OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on September 9, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
August I8, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting,
A. CALL TO O'RDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 18, 1999, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor William J. A~exander.
Present were Agency Members: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Kevin Ennis, Deputy City
Attorney; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer; Jon Gillespie; Traffic Engineer; Bob Zette.rberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff,
Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Joan
Kruse, Purchasing Manager; Bob Bowery, Information Systems Manager; Kevin McArdle, Community
Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager;
Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the= City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis
Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Nick Karavidas for being named "Farmer of the Year."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation.
Mr. Karavidas thanked the Mayor and Council and talked about his family and the Fi~ippi family.
mentioned a television show that would air in a couple of weeks on Sunday regarding wine making.
He
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. George Georgiou asked that an item be placed on the next agenda regarding his appeal of a decision
by the Building Official which was ~ed with the City Clerk in the middle of April. He felt the City had thirty
days to hear this and now that time period is over. He stated his argument is that the new Appeals Board
has no authority to hear his appeal for the reason that it is, not composed of the five members that was
required at the time he made the appeal. He also stated they have no authority to rule on procedural matters
which is what his appeal is about.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 2
Mayor Alexander asked Mr. Markman if they can actually place this matter on the agenda.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated Mr. Georgiou has flied a claim against the City and he would advise
the Council not to respond to him in any way. He said it would not be prudent to place this on the agenda
as all of this subject matter is the subject matter of his claim. Mr. Markman stated Mr. Georgiou has a first
amendment right to speak under public comments, but that he is advising the Council that since there is a
claim filed, which is a clear threat of litigation, that the Council not respond.
Mr. Georgiou continued to comment that the Appeals Board has no authority to hear his appeal under the
new Ordinance recently passed. He stated under the old Ordinance the previous Board did have the
authority. He stated they would like to place on the agenda for clarification what rules are being followed
at the time, his appea~ was filed. He stated it is very important to him that his appeal go forward despite his
claim filed against the City.
Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated Mr. Georgiou is entitled to pursue his Administrative Appeal and so the
fact that since he has filed a claim does not prohibit the City from processing his appeal.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: July 7, 1999
July 21, 1999
D2. Approval of Warrants,. Register Nos. 7/28/99 (98/99), 7/28/99 (99/00), 8/4/99 (98/99) and 8/4/99
(99/00), and Payroll ending. 7/18/99 for the total amount of $2,478,302.51.
D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 1999.
D4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for the Twins, Twins Club, Inc.
(transfer of license), Robert James Lakkees, 10134 Foothill Blvd.
D5. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for the Noble House Asian Cuisine
(transfer of license), Don Cheng& Judy C. Tsai Chou, 7203 Haven Ave.
D6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue, to be funded from #10-4637-9808.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LEMON AVENUE
TO WILSON AVENUE IN SAiD CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D7. Approval of a Resolution to accept control and maintenance over portions of Smokestone Street and
Mulberry Street between East Avenue and I-15, to be relinquished by the State of California.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-180
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ACCEPTING CONTROL AND
MAINTENANCE OVER PORTI:ONS OF SMOKESTONE STREET AND
MULBERRY STREET BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND 1-15, TO BE
RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
D8. Approval of transfer of vehicle title for a 1999 Chevrolet Passenger Mini-Van and a GMC Safari
Cargo Van to the San Bernardino County SherifFs Department for purposes of insurance/liability.
D9. Approval of request from Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters Association for City to co-
sponsor Celebrity Charity Softball Game on October 10, 1999, at the Epicenter Stadium and to waive
associated fees and charges.
D10. Approval to appropriate $10,000 awarded by the California State Library into expenditure account
137-4532.
D11. Approval of request from City of Hope, Legacies Chapter Inland Empire, Number 1605, for City to
waive associated fees and charges to hold a blood drive at Lions Community Center West on September
10, 1999.
D12. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer required as provided under
Government Code Sections 34090 and 34090.5.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-181
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY
RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS
PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND 34090.5
D13. Approval of a Resolution of Intention to Vacate the south 33 feet of Victoria Street fronting the
northerly boundary of Tentative Tract 15915; west of Etiwanda Avenue and setting the date of the public
hearing for September 15, 1999.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-182:
A RESOLUTION OF THE: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE
SOUTH 33 FEET OF VICTORIA STREET FRONTING THE NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF TENTATIVE TRACT 15915 WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE
D14. Approval to declare surplus miscellaneous City-owned equipment.
D 15. Approval of the assignment of Yukon Disposal's Refuse Franchise Permit to Rancho Disposal.
D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
Conditional Use Permit No. 98-26, located at the northeast corner of Mission Vista Drive and Pittsburgh
Avenue, submitted by Norm Wilson & Sons, Inc., General Contractors.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 99-183
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~MPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-26
RESOLUTION NO. 99-184
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 98-26
D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Conditional Use Permit No. 98-
25, located at the southwest corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street, submitted by Chevron Products
Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-185
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~MPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-25
D18. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
Conditional Use Permit No. 98-32, located on the east side of Chades Smith Avenue north of San Marino
Drive, submitted by Cardlock Fuels System, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-186
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-32
RESOLUTION NO. 99-187
a RESOLLJTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN,A, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 98-32
D 19. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract
Map Numbers 15871-1 and 15871-2, located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria
Park Lane, and release the previously submitted Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities
accepted by City Council on May 6, 1986, from William Lyon Company.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 99-188
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMO. NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBERS 15871-1
AND 15871-2 iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 99-189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET
L~GHTING MAliNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP
NUMBERS 15871-1 AND 2
D20. Approval of a Settlement Agreement for Off-Site Street Improvements between Centex Homes and
the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Tract 12659, located at the southeast corner of Wilson and Hanley
Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-190
A RESOLUTION Of THE: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CENTEX HOMES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR
TRACT 12659
D21. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Professional Services Agreement with Pitassi
Architects (CO 99-073) for architectural services for the warehouse construction at Ninth Street Yard, in the
amount of $50,000, to be funded from Acct. No. 15-.50300.
D22. Approval of an amended and restated lease agreement (CO 92-0.64) between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc.
D23. Approval of an agreement (CO 99-074) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley
Baseball Club, Inc., providing for a Fall 1999 Baseball League at the Epicenter.
D24. Approval to award and authorize execution of a contract with Shared Technologies Fairchild (CO
99-075) for a centralized telecommunications network in the amount of $573,341, including tax, to be funded
from Account No. 72-4225-7044.
D25. Approval to award and authorize the execution of a contract between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Bi-tech Software Inc. (CO 99-076) in the amount of $808,224 for the purchase of financial
and human resources software and professional services to be funded from the Computer Equipment
Replacement Fund (74-4225-3950 and 74-4225-6028).
D26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Improvements for 5625 Hellman Avenue.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 99-191
A RESOLUTION OF THE: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
5625 HELLMAN AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, #111 3334 1336, and
file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 13565-8, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation,
a Delaware Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN:CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13565-8 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D28. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Beautification project, from Church Street to Base Line Road,
Contract No. 98-070, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $178,441.39.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, FROM CHURCH STREET TO
BASE LINE ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 98-070, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0~
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment
regarding the filing of applications and sign copies on monument signs.
E1 & E2. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 608 and 558C.
ORDINANCE NO. 606 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THI= CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99-
01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING MONUMENT SIGNS AND TO RESTRICT SUBMITTAL OF SAME
APPLICATION WITHIN 12 MONTHS
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 7
E2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO REDUCE THE UTILITY USER'S FEES
ORDINANCE NO. 558-C (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 608
and 558-C. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW
ARCHITECTS - An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the
southeast comer of Hermo.sa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09.
Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District
Amendment 99-02, and Conditiona~ Use Permit 99-08. {Continued from August 4, 1999.)
Staff report for F1 through F4 presented by Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, who also viewed a map to
explain the project and the access for the construction traffic.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Garth Brandaw, Curry Brandaw Architects, explained why they think this is an ideal site for this type
of project. He talked about the aspects of the project and why it was an attribute to the City. He
mentioned the neighborhood meetings and the input they received. He stated some of the access
recommendations have come from the residents that came to the meetings. He stated they felt they
have gone through all of the processes and have accomplished everything that has been asked of
them. He asked for the Council to approve the project and approve the alternate site plan.
Mary Jo Gurley stated her concern has been the large volume of traffic this project would create.
She felt the Hamilton access would result in accidents because of the number of people traveling
this street. She felt the compromisE; would satisfy the residents by approving the alternate plan
which would move the access from Hamilton to 19th Street. She stated this would satisfy the
residents. She felt the main entrance should be a right turn only in and out of the facility for safety
reasons. She stated Engineering did agree with this suggestion. She felt this plan would alleviate
99% of the concerns the residents had.
Brian Brock, 6780 Teak Way, stated he is opposed to this because he felt it should be single family
residences in this area as opposed to the senior project. He felt there would be too many people
with vehicles going in and out of the complex. He talked about the traffic around the school area
of 19th and Hamilton. He felt the zoning should be left at single family dwellings. He still felt there
would be traffic problems even with the plan changes.
CityCouncil Minutes
August18,1999
Page 8
Jack Williams, 9800 Base Line, stated he lives in a single family community and makes several trips
in and out of his complex each day. He stated he has looked into these types of projects and did
not feel there would be an excess of traffic or crime because of the project being built.
Diane Pastor stated she will miss the sheep in the field, but felt everyone has worked together to
come up with a good project. She felt some of the parents can help control the traffic areund the
school if they try. She felt the people living in the project and the school could possibly help each
other out. She thought it looked like a good plan.
Abdul E. Dudi, lives near Deer Canyon Elementary and this project, stated he just learned about this
project the other day and did not like the late notice he received. He did not feel he was
knowledgeable enough to comment for or again:st this project and asked that the Council continue
the matter so the area residents can better study this plan. He stated he was concerned that the
seniors might have problems getting into the project on Hermosa if there are flash flood waters to
deal with. He asked that they be given the opportunity to study this and give input at a future
meeting.
Gary Kendrick felt there should be a large enough sign posted at this site so people would be more
informed and could give input. He stated he is concerned about the traffic and stated he did not
agree with the senior project concept as a place for elderly to live in.
Pamela Plant, 6591 Morocco, stated she did not know about this project until a couple of days ago.
She commented on fire truck access and stated she did like the new proposed plan. She continued
to point out problems there would be with traffic.
Mary Dane.en, Highland and Archibald, stated she heard about this project one to two months ago.
She felt it is a good thing but felt there should have been a 4' x 6' sign posted to let everyone know
about the project. She suggested there be an emergency exit if the street does flood at the north
end of the project. She felt a right turn indentation would be helpful also. She hoped the Council
would appreve the new plan.
Mary Jo Gurley stated she has contacted the Fire Department on the number of calls at other senior
projects an.d stated there is only about one per week.
Ralph Marreo, Castle Gate Community, stated he is opposed to this project and didn't think it was
right for this area. He felt it would hurt the price of homes if this is built. He stated he didn't agree
with the parking and felt it had been reduced.
Mayor Alexander stated it has not been reduced and that it follows the code requirements.
Dave Barrett, Morroco Street, stated he was concerned about the drainage of water on Hermosa.
He stated he felt the sign at the site should have been bigger and felt the Council should take a little
more time to consider this matter. He felt they should consider the children's safety.
Abdul E. Dudi stated he did not feel the notification process was done properly and did not feel 300'
from the proposed project was enough for notification of residents.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated mailings were done within 300' and also further by about three to four times.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 9
Councilmember Dutton inquired if those that had signed the petition that had previously been submitted to
the Council had been sent a letter.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes.
Brad Buller, City Planner, informed the Council of the other' legal requirements that staff met for property
notification. He added the Principal and: Assistant Superintendent at the neighboring school did show up
at some of the neighborhood meetings and that they are aware of this project.
Councilmember Williams asked Chief Michael about the water on Hermosa during a heavy storm and would
it be a problem for emergency vehicles.
Chief Michael stated sometimes they do have to travel on Hermosa but added the emergency vehicles can
withstand the flooded streets. He stated if an ambulance were not able to get in off Hermosa he will talk with
the Building Official to see what alternate plan can be worked out.
Councilmember Biane asked if the Route 30 construction would take away or divert any water.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes there will be some water diverted with the construction of Route 30 so
there would be less on Hermosa.
Councilmember Curatalo felt staff has done a good job with the issues presented and mitigating them for
the residents. He stated he is ready to vote to accept staff's recommendation.
Councilmember Dutton pointed out the person circulating the fliers is now okay with the project for
everyone's information. He commented on the amenities for the project. He felt single family residences
would create more traffic for this area than the proposed senior project.
Councilmember Biane stated Route 30 will dramatically decrease traffic on 19th Street. He did not think, if
for some reason this project does not go in, that someone would come along and put in something that is
better for the neighborhood. He stated he would support this project.
Mayor Alexander stated he supported this project. and felt it was a wonderful idea.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there are two conditions in the Resolution of the CUP that will have to be
addressed to mod;ify. He stated the first one is on page 374 which had to do with delivery access times for
off of Hamilton since Hamilton Street will no longer have a driveway. He added that condition should be
deleted. He stated on page 375 which talks again about the driveways on Hamilton Street, he would
recommend that condition 5 be modified and replaced with a condition that says "driveway location shall be
as shown on exhibit "A" as presented to the City Council at their meeting of 8/18/99; specifically one
driveway on Hermosa and one on 19th Street."
Councilmember Williams brought up the emergency access issue should be looked at and incorporate it
somewhere.
James Markman, City Attorney, asked if they would have to do something with the turn movements.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this is a technical matter that they can handle with the Traffic Engineer and
that they would handle the emergency access issue as well~
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 10
Councilmember Williams pointed out one of the conditions is to install a bus bay and wanted to make sure
it has a bench.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated he wants to point out to the Council in that Resolution there is a
reference in the standard conditions to the site plan which is approved. He stated this site plan will also be
what is presented this evening as exhibit "A".
RESOLUTION NO. 99-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROWNG HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 99-02, TO DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE (BUILT IN
APPROXIMATELY 1934) AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, AT 6729
HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
1076-111-09
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change General Plan land use designation
from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Ave. & 19th St. - APN: 1076-
111-09. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related
files: Development District Amend. 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark
Designation 99-02. (Continued from August 4, 1999.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-151
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-
02:, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR
APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSAAVENUE AND 19TM STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09
F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99,-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development
District zoning designation from Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of
Hermosa Ave. and 19th Street- APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan Amendment 99-02,
Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from August 4, 199,9.)
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 607.
ORDINANCE NO. 607 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT
City Council Minutes
August18,1999
Page 11
DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09
F4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW
ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residentia~ care facility for the elderly
totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land,. located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th
Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-
02. (Continued from August 4, 1999.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-
08 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TWO-STORY
RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY' CONSISTING OF 114 SUITES FOR THE
ELDERLY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON
APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED. ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS.
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111.-09
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo,. seconded by Biane to approve Resolution Nos. 99-150, 99-151 and 99-152,
and to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 607 for the September 1,1999 meeting.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF
CITIES ANNUAL MEETING
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Curatalo to appoint Biane as the voting delegate and Dutton
as the alternate. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 12
12. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL'S PARK AND RECREATION SUBCOMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL COMMISSION VACANCY
Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Biane to accept the subcommittee's recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
13. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
A. PARK AND FACILITIES UPDATE
1,, Etiwanda Creek Park
2. Central Park
3. Various Parks
4. Haven Avenue Beautification Project
5,,,City Hall
6. Lions West Community Center
7. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Youth Sports
RC Family Sports Center
6. Adult Sports
7.. Trips & Tours
8. Human Services
9. Facilities
10. The Grapevine
11. Contract Classes
12. Community Wide Special Events
13. RC Performing Arts
14. Park and Recreation Commission
15. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation
16. Epicenter
Report received and filed.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF iTEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
City Council Minutes
August 18, 1999
Page 13
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Mikki Green, Fujitsu, submitted information to the Council on the centralized phone system which should
to be included with their proposal.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: **
September 15, 1999
Mayor William Alexander and the
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.~ 91729
RE: 10478 Cartad Street- APN 1074-131-01
Dear Mayor Alexander and Council:
This letter is in response to the alleged code violations on our property. I have spoken
with Ms. Barnett several times and Mayor Alexander visited our property. We still have not
received a clear response to our questions and concerns which are addressed in this letter.
First, I traderstand the allegation that our basketball hoop is not within code is moot. The
mayor, himself,. thought the allegation was ridiculous. Second, Ms. Barnett's statement to me
that my husband and I do not care or are involved in city affairs was not only rude, but without
merit. As I told Ms. Barnett and the mayor, my husband and I each contribute to the blood bank
almost every three months; my husband has participated in the volunteer city improvement
projects on Baseline in from of the Central Park area, the scraping and painting of Sweeten Hall,
numerous eagle projects in the city and the recent Haven Avenue rock work. He has worked
with scouts for over thirteen years in this city and we volunteer our pool for groups to teach and
certify youth in lifesaving. I have participated, taught and judged 4H programs for eight years as
a volunteer. I am an emergency certified person for this city. I am a supervisor for the local
election place, a parent-teacher volunteer in the schools, a judge for food preservation for San
Bernardino, Los Angeles and Orange counties, and teach food preservation and safety through
the county and church communities. All of this we do as volunteers.
My husband and I moved here over thirteen years ago and improved our property. The
improvements we made to the property were to code at the time. We have a cement pad to the
right of our property in front of our wall where we park one of our boats and camper. Sometime
since 1991, the city enacted ordinances that supposedly caused my property not to be within code
requirements regarding the parking of our recreational vehicle and boat. I was initially told we
were grandfathered and then later advised we were not.
Rancho Cucarnonga City Council
September 15, 1999
Page 2
According to RCMC Section 17.08.070F 3 d. we fit the exception to the local ordinance that all
recreational vehicles must be parked in the side or rear of the property and the gate must be
screened. The code states:
Time limits established in paragraph c may be waived for a specific property
when all of the following conditions can be demonstrated:
(1) Current owner or resident has resided on said property since prior to December
31, 1991, and
(2) Current owner or resident has owned a recreational vehicle since prior to
December 31~ 991, while residing on the property, and.
(3) Property in question cannot reasonably accommodate recreational vehicle
storage in the side or rear yard; and
(14) Recreational vehicle may only be parked or stored on a paved surface located
between the driveway and the nearest side property line; and
(5) Property in question is NOT located within the Planned Communities of
Caryn, Terra Vista, or Victoria.
We meet each of these conditions to be excluded from the city limitations of only
temporary parking in the front yard or comer side yard areas abutting a street. We still have
received no response to why we do not meet this "grandfather" clause.
Further, I understand that another ordinance has been created that in reality the side of my
yard that faces Masada is the front of my property and that the front of my property is actually
the side of my property. With comer properties, the shorter side is considered the front of the
property and the longer side is considered the side of the property. This would make the area we
park the vehicles in question the rear of our property.
Since receiving the violation notice I have driven around the surrounding area. I have
located over 160 violations within one mile of our home of the code sections we have allegedly
violated. It is clear the city cannot enforce this ordinance against all of the property owners. It is
unfair to homeowners who purchased homes prior to 1991 and improved their lots which do not
meet these present standards. If an owner parks recreational vehicles that are in disrepair and no
longer used the city has an ordinance that addresses these situations as unsitely. If a property
owner desires to live in an area where vehicles cannot be parked in view from the street then they
should purchase a home in some of the areas where CC and Rs restrict such matters.
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
September 15, 1999
Page 3
I would asked the Mayor and this council to please address my specific situation as to
why I do not meet the exception clause and secondly, consider whether this ordinance truly
benefits the city and property owners.
Sincerely,
C~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FGR PERIOD: 0B-25-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 08/25/99 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO
:: N~RRo AMT.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
BUSINESS LICENSE
31634 HOOPER, DEONDREA RECREATION
235 OWEN ELECTRIC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
6052 CHARTER COMMuN.~A.Yq"~ ADVERTISING FEE
5023 3M COMPANY
215~6 A & d CHEESE CO.
1098 A G ENGINEERING
2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS
3785 ACTION ART
5792 AOAM~ ROBERT
6~09 ADAMSON, RONALD
21560 ADLAWAN~ A!OA
523! AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING~ INC.
1826 AiRTOUCH CELLULAR
~207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
3448 ALL WELDING
6290 ALLEN, TONY
6226 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS
17 ALTA FiRE E~UIPHENT CO.
gb93 A~TECH ELEVATOR ~ERViCcs
21561 ANDRUS~ CINDY
5a07 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
2299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES
667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
6255 ASSI SECURITY
4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
21558 BARROW, KARLA
33 ~ASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWAR~
5791 BELETTO, NANCY
21557 BELLER~ CLAIR
~323 8ELLSOUTH WIRELESS DATA
5119 BENSON~ MAbRY
2156Z aERMUDEZ, MANUEL
6067 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR
4441 BEST BUY CO., iNC.
21553 BI~B~ HILDA
6~38 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS
1247 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC.
481 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
21550 BOONE~ ViCKY
21554 BROWN~ CHERRY
1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES
5~&! BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES
5591 BURCHFIELD~ ~ARRELL
552 BURK-BLACKSCMLEGER, ROSEANN
&339 CA.CRIME PREVENTION OFFICERS ASSOC.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION REFUN~
RECREAIION REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS
INSTAlLATiON/SERViCE
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
SERVICE/SUPPLIeS
MONTHLY SERVICE
R~CREATION REFUN~
PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VISA MDNTMLY bILLINGS
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
R~CREATION REFUND
COMMUNICATION CHARGE
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION REFUa~
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREAYIDN REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MEDICAL PREMIUM
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
CONSULTANT SERVICES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
INSTRUCTOR PMT
RECREATION REFUND
-,-~ CMECKe OVERLAP
139190. ]87.26~
1~9191- 141750 >>>
141751~ 25.00-
141752- 14 ZS79
~ 142580~ 49,7~2.50-
142581- 1&Z808 >>>
142810- !4~030
143031 5,700.00
143032
e 143033 1~73~.30
a 143034 3,380.98
~43035 67.56
~43036 1~.00
1430~7
143038 ~0.00
e 1430~9 3,600.00
143040 29.05
143041 XgO.00
14304g 60.00
143043 588.00
143044 2~625.23
143045 3a.05
! 143046 806.39
1~0~7 2,0.00
~ le3048 859.73
1~3049 62.39
143050- 1~3050
~ 143051 2,178.17
1~3052 I ~233.68
e 1.3053 1~784.~3
e 1~3054
e 1.3055 *~.36
143056 37.60
1430ST
~ 143058 3~169.19
143059
~ 143060 130.00
1~3061
a 143062 41.96
143063 66.00
14306~ 16.15
a 1~3065 126.34
143066 5,248.53
1~3067 33.00
143068 52.80
143069 936.80
e 1~3070
143072 3e3ZZ.00
143073 2~.00
CiTY 3F RANCH~ CUCAMONGA
LIST GF wARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 0~-25-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 08/25/99 PAGE: Z
VENDOR NAME iTEM OESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~ CHECKm OVERLAP
1951 CAL WESTERN PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143074 2,020.31
4575 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT A$SOCo EMPLOYMENT AD 143075 370.00
4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 143076 933.41
21551 CAPPEL~ SHEILA RECREATION REFUND 163077
4603 CAPPO~ INC. MEMBERSHIP DUES 143075 30.00
21545 CARMELL, PATRICK & KRISTIE DEPOSIT REFUND 143079 500.00
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 1~3080 2,896.32
21568 CHAFFIN, CHARLES RECREATION REFUND 143081
21549 CHAN~ BELONICA RECREATION REFUND 163082 ~0o00
2i555 CHANTRY~ NIDIA RECREATION REFUND 143083 26.~0
6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING FEE 143086 39.68
6OSZ CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING FEE ~ 163085
2156~ CHAVIRA~ JULIE RECREATION REFUND e 143085 117.50
21556 CHINCILLA~ MARCELK RECREATION REFUN~ 143087 26.~0
21552 CHUNG~ RUN HEE RECREATION REFUND 143088 33.00
21567 CIPRES~ ARACELI RECREATION REFUND # 163089 61.00
74 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 163090 912.20
969 CLARK~ KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143091 Z66.00
21559 COFFMAN, SABRINA RECREATION REFUND 163092 103.50
3073 COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 163093 !02.53
4363 COLTON SURVEYING I~STRUMENTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 143094 2~067.25
5607 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 163095 560°00
6301 COMPUSAs INC. MAINTENANCa SUPPLIES e 163096 8~995.30
<<< 143097 - 163097
130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 16309B 7,230o63
2362 COMSERCO~ INC. SERVICE/REPAIRS 143099 282.66
2258 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST.~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14~100 431.86
5713 CPRS NPSI R~GISTRATION 143101 460.00
<<< 143102 - 163106
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER OIST MONTHLY wATER ~ILLINGS ~ 143105 22,256.58
239 D ~ K CONCRETE CO STREET MAINTENANCE e 163106
4488 DAGHOEVIR!AN, KATHY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143107 432°00
286 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO~ INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 143108 1~756.06
Z478 DAPPER TIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 143109
6145 DAVIS~ SAM CONTRACT SERVICES 143110 720.00
347 DAY-TIMERS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 163111 38°?5
5121 DE VOOGHT~ SCOTT J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 163112 210o00
4101S DEALERS TRUST/NATIONAL SECURITY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143113 35.22
1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 143114 63.00
107 DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES e 143115 66.33
5534 DIAL COMMUNICATIONS PRCFESSiONAL SERVICES e 163116 95.13
41016 OILL~ SHEILA RECREATION REFUND 163117 26o40
36640 DINICOLA~ KAREN RECREATION REFUND 163118 15o00
5788 DUFFY~ RICK/USKO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 163119
4205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS~ INC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 143120 58.95
5916 ED BUILDING FAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 143121 &,180.00
33b6 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES 163122 307.65
229 EWING IRRIGATION PR2DUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES # 163123 290.69
5~17 FASTENAL COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 163126 189.81
41017 FIELDSTONE COMMUNITIES INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143125 967.26
2909 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE, IMCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 163126
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 08-25-99 C99/00)
RUN DATE: 08/25/99 PAGE:
R NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMTo
~ CHECK~ aVERLAP
4762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FAMILY SHELTER J 143127
2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 143128
3178 FOWLER, MARK iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143129
6232 GADABOUT TOURS. INC RECREATION ~ 143130
60?0 GALE GROUPt THE LIBRARY BOOKS 143131
41018 GALVEZ, JESS RECREATION REFUND 143132
5737 GAME RO~M GALLERY RECREATION SUPPLIES 143133
5157 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIES & SERVICE 145134
55gg GIORDANO, MARIANNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143135
41019 GOLDEN KRAFT, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143136
5955 G~LDEN WEST DISTRIbUTiNG RECREATION SUPPLIES 143~37
1245 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A. LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 143138
5~iZ GOODHEART, PAULA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143139
050 GRAINGER~ NoW. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143140
41020 GRAVES, PATRICia RECREATION REFUND 1431~1
3827 GREEN ROCK PCWER E~UiPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 143142
~386 GREGORY, CHERI ~NSTRUCTOR PAYMENY 143143
<(( 143144 - 143144
137 GTE CALIFORNIA MGNTHL¥ TELEPHONE 8!LLING5 # 143145
4½86 GUARDIAN MECICAL PREMIUM 143146
41021 GUIREY, TERRY RECREATION REFUNO I43147
6277 GUZMAN~ LESLIE CONTRACT SERVICE 143148
318~9 HAGGI, MONICA RECREATION 143149
6127 HANGER 18 BUSiNeSS LICENSE ~EFUN~ 143150
5699 HARALAM~OS BEVERAGE COMPbNY RECREATION SUPPLIES 14315!
31a38 HARNETIAUX, ADRIENN~ RECREATION 143152
~62 dES-CUTLER STEEL CO. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE # 143153
3334 MEILI~ KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143154
31~1 H~I?MAN, PAUL ~ECR~ATiON 143155
5352 HEMBORG FORD VEHICLE PURCHASES # 143156
31~58 HENRY, DONNA RECREATION I43157
5460 HIDALGO, CARLO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143158
4J7 HINDERLITER~ de LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES # 143159
4928 HOCKEY WEST RECREATION 143160
~81! HOLIDAY INN HOTEL RES£RVRTIONS 143161
~58 HOLLIDA¥ R~CK COo~ INC. MAINTEKANCE SUPPLIES 143162
161 HOYT LUMBER CO.~ S.M. MAINT~kANC: SUPPLIES ~ 143163
2½12 HOYT, RAYMCNE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143164
½95 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 143165
167 I C B 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143166
~188 I D BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES m 14316?
6279 IoBoDo 3USINESS LICENSE REFUND 143168
eZ54 iBM CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 143169
318~2 INDRA, ANGELINE RECREATION 143170
1218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 143171
5519 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP MAINTENANCE 143172
568z INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES # 143173
~835 iNLAND LAWNMCWER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 143174
4718 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 143175
~22 iNLANO VALLEY DAILY ~ULLETiN ADVERTISING ~ I~3176
6202 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACAOEMY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143177
>>>
492.50
3,287.85
20~.00
2,706.30
160.15
15.OO
30.02
135.00
1~8.70
ls349.Z8
85.48
2,300.00
676.50
113.14
!30.00
581.70
179.20
612.65
6~1.60
~3.00
245.00
25.00
608.00
194.35
25.00
526.73
1,159.68
125.00
64,182.09
125.00
240.00
1,771.66
78.99
276.25
529.40
402.88
910.56
60.00
418.61
1~6.50
2,128.25
26.40
316.80
995.00
1,226.00
11.30
215.50
3,180.65
574.00
~ VEN~R
2315
11752
612
6344
31831
31829
4700
i79
31844
6193
31843
6090
31845
421T
5Z16
31830
31849
033b
5134
6327
31832
5313
3156
4941
31847
386
6335
4727
4T01
5921
31850
5300
31851
31852
1025
3!~57
2198
6170
5852
31854
3860
~374
lOZO
2248
JlB4B
31~33
31840
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 08-25-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 08/25/99 PAGE:
NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~'* CHECKI OVERLAP
INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143178 56.03
INNOVATIVE CONSULTANTS INC REFUND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 143179 571.00
JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 143180 155.46
JAM FACTDRY RECREATION REFUND 143181 200.00
JAYDUNG INTERNATIONAL C3. BUSINESS LICENSE 143182 15.00
JOEL'S M~5ILE TRUCK MAINT. & REPAIR BUSINESS LICENSE 143183 18.00
JDNES~ KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143184 230.40
KAISER FOUNDATION ~EALTH PLAN MEEICAL INSURANCE 143185 279141.10
KEMP~ ROMONA RECREATION 143186 20.00
KLAMATH BAY RECREATION REFUND # 143187 19635.39
KNOWLES~ CDRI RECREATION 143188 26.40
KONG, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143189 480.00
KDTOWSKI, MARCI RECREATION 143190 125.00
KOZLOVICH. gEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143191 1~67.90
LADNER COATINGS EMERGENCY INSTALLATION # 143192 7.950.00
LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143193 148.20
LAW OFFICE OF DAVIC H. RICKS ~USINESS LICENSE 143194 49.82
LEVER, CAROL RECREATION 143195 125.00
LEWAN~ MARK SUBSCRIPTIONS 143196 150.00
LEWIS & LEWIS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143!97 148.70
L~WIS OPERATING CORPORATION RECREATION REFUND 143198 19.00
LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS BUSINESS LICENSE 143199 20.16
LgNG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSING 143200 74.16
LOWE~ MARIAARE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143201 180.00
LU'S LIGHTHOUSE~ INC. OIL ANALYSIS e 143202 1~972.37
LUCKETT ROOFING CO. MAINTENANCE 143203 1,100.00
LUJAN, TRERA RECREATION 143204 33.00
LYON CO.~ WILLIAM REFUNDAELE DEPOSITS 143205 10,000.00
MACHEN, LAUREN RECREATION 143206 15o00
MAMMAROe JULIE REFUND DEPOSIT 143207 200.00
MARSHALL P~N~ REHAB. PROGRAM ~ 143208 3,315.05
MARSHALL, SYLVia RgCREATION REFUND 143209 467.64
MARTIN INDUSTRIES POLICE SUPPLIES 143210 549.53
MARTIN, ELIZABETH RECREATION e 143211 130.00
MAYER~ COBLE & PAL~ER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14321~ 1,250.00
MCCUNE, ANNE C. RECREATION 143213 200.00
MCGINN, PATRICK RECREATION 143214 125.00
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 163215 352.93
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. 8USINkSS LICENSE 143216 387.26
MICHAELS STORES INC. $3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 143217 50.40
MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 1994 CTE DUES 14321§ 9.70
MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 143219 3~9.89
MILLER~ FLORA RECREATION 143220 40.00
MOBILE MINI~ INC. STORAGE SUPPLIgS # 143221 413.80
MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, iNC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 143222 140.13
MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS & MIRROR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 1432~3 381.63
MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG. REPAIR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143224 80.47
NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 143225 151.87
NASH~ LIONEL RECREATION 143226 200°00
NATURAL STONEWORKS BUSINESS LICENSE 143227 79.33
NGUYEN, CHI RECREATION 143228 200.00
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERIOD: 08-25-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 05/25/99 PAGE:
............................................. ~ESCRIPT~N
VENDOR NAME ITEM WARR NO
WARRe AMTo
~ CHECKe OVERLAP
5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 143229 740.00
31835 NY STATE LIBRARY PHOTODUPLICATION LIBRARY 143230 10o00
31B37 OAKSTONE LEGAL g BUS. PUgLICATiON SUBSCRIPTION 143231 145o00
4853 OCLCt INC. CORE SERVICES CHARGES ~ 143232 218-97
<<< 143233 - 143233
523 OFFICE DEPCT OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 143234 2t176.88
527 OLYMPIC STUC!OS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143235
232 OMNITRANS BUS PASSES 143236 Z~5o00
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143237 537.60
5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDdARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 143238 700.82
¢(< 143239 - 143239
235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLI':S ~ 143240 27~659.60
31855 OW5N~ TED RECREATION 143241 40.00
338 PACIFIC EQ~IPT C IRRIGATION, INC. MAINT~NANC~ SUPPLIES ~ 143242 62.79
5343 PACIFIC PLUMBING SFECIALTIES MAINTENANC~ $UPPLI£S 143243 7~o87
6287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA RECREATION REFdND 143244 30,974.40
31857 PAGLINA~AN, LUZ RECREATION 143245 52.80
4223 PAPER DIRECT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 143Z46 281o45
5293 PERFORMANCE AUTO BCDY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 143247 727.12
5720 PERVO PAINT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14~248 698°76
6089 PITTSm LISA R~CREATION REFUND 143249 66.00
3143e PIZZA HUT/CELIVERY a 705~02 BUSINESS LICENSE 143250
791 PMI/DEL/A CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 143251 1~193.70
255 POMA DISTRIBUTING C'J V~HICLE MAINTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES i 143252 12t751.63
1049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 143253 2.283.14
~177 PORT SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143254 17g.11
~1856 POULTON, TRACY RECREATION 143255 33°00
5900 POWER K TRUCK HYDRAULICS POSTAGE METER ~ES~T 143256 15o81
~93 POWERSTRiDE BATTERY C2., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 143257
~aO! PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, iNC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 143258 65.92
5316 PRECiSiON GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR P~YMENT 143259 648.00
eB41 PRESTONt HICPAEL ~NSTRUCTOR PAYMENT I43260 390.00
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 143261 622.72
4420 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143262
1890 R & R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES 143263 306.44
11357 RADISSON MCTEL CDNFERBNCE~ HOTEL RESERVATIONS 143264 1~1o70
11032 RAMOS, CINCY RECREATION REFUNDS e 143265 26.40
2600 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT SALARY AND BENEFITS 143266 2,921.51
545 RED WING ShOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS $ 143267 573.85
6337 REINHARDT, RITA RECREATION REFUND 143268 l~lB4.00
5618 RICHARDS, WATS~N~ & GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES S 143269 20~730.~T
11132 RIVERA-MARiN, LIGIA RECREATION REFUNDS 143270 ?6°00
276 RIVERSIDE ~LUEPRINT PRINTS ! 143271 1~704o82
3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANOSCAPE SUPPLIES # 143272 4t140o61
4704 RUSH. CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT # 143273 622o71
454 S C C C A MEETING 143274 90.00
5538 SAN ANTONIO PATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143275 184.8b
1~92 SAN BERN CCENTY FLO~O CaNTROL DEPT INSPECTION FEE I43276 14.225o00
301 SAN BERN C~UNTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE e 143277 836~2~4o42
5374 SAN DIEGO STAGE g LIGHTING LIGHTING SUPPLIES ~ 143278 1,406~88
3IiZO SCMAF MEETING 143279 ~50.00
Ci[Y ~F RANCHo C~CAMONGA
L!ST OF WARRANTS
FCR P~RI2D: 08-25-99 (92/003
RUN OATC: 08/25/99 PAGE: 6
VENDOR NA ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO
..... = ======== = WARR. AMT.
~ CHECKm OVERLAP
1105 S~AL FURNITURE E SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 143280 675.00
5634 SENNt CINDY INSTRUCTOP PAYM2NT 143281 111.60
11742 SHEA, MARY RECREATION REFUNDS 143282 25.00
11743 SHIPLEY~ ~ONNIk RECREATION REFUNDS 143283 20.00
2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES · 143284 14t974.96
351 SiGN SHDPt T~E MAINT SUPPLIES $ 143285 263.59
11741 SKK METRO RECLINE EUSIN~SS LICENSE REFUNOS 143286 47.76
1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES e 143287 lt219.50
319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS ~ILLS ~ 143288 52.92
<(( !~3289 - 143297
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON M~NTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 143298 15~96B.91
11576 $PENCER~ KERRY RECREATION REFUND 143299 1!.00
6343 STADIUM SELF STORAGE bUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143300 505.00
2847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT., INC. S~RVICE AND SUPPLIES 143301 4,123o20
3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 143302 40.00
4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES e 143303 251.15
5410 T g D INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES # 143304 617.65
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP SUPPL # 143305
11744 TAYLOR~ OAR~LENE RECREATION REFUND 143306 ZI.SO
2718 TERRY~ DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143307 198.00
11078 THIENES ENGINEERING INC ~USINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 143308
10977 THOMAS JDH~ TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 143309 250.00
33~3 TODD~ SYLVIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143310 148.50
6341 TULLIO~ eO~ RECREATION REFUND 143311 350°00
&340 TULLIO~ JIM RECREATION REFUN~ 143312 350.00
2737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE I43313
2737 U C REGENTS POCZET GUIDE 143314 576.00
4558 U S GUAR:S CO.~ INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE a 143315 3t075.06
2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES # 143316 2,717.25
3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES ~ 143317 383.32
5233 UNiSTRUT SUPPLIES 143318
1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 143319 40.22
919 UNITED WAY MEETINGS 143320 20.00
3825 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA MISC 143321 530.00
4606 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143322 1~540.B0
489 UPLAND, CITY OF MONTHLY WATER ~ILLING 143323 279.55
~296 UPSCO SUPPLIES & SERVICE 143324 560.00
3141 VAN TEEM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 143325 403.89
5285 VIKING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES # 1~3326 Z,210.75
11747 VILLANIt MELANIE RECREATION REFUN$S 143327 33.00
6098 VISIONS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 143328 12B.96
11748 VIVANCO, MONICA RECREATION REFUNDS 143329 12.50
5870 VLSYSTEMS, INC. COMPUTER HARDWARE # 143330 9t061.28
2340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES MAINT SERVICE & REPAIRS 143331 768.75
286~ WALL STREET JOURNAL SUaSCRiPTION 143332 95.90
478 WARREN & COo, CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS e 1433~3
11749 WATKINSt TERRY RECREATION REFUNDS 143334 100.00
213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CDRP MAINT SUPPLIES # 143~35
4577 WELLS FARGC GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES # 143336 3,31T.31
11750 WESSEL, TAMI RECREATION REFUNBS 143337 75.00
6181 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND # 143338 259.14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 08-25-99 C99/00)
RUN DATE: 08/25/99
ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo ANT.
'""' CHECK# OVERLAP
5526 WEST GROUP PUBLISHING 143339 1!0o00
3080 W~ITTIER FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 143340 320.B6
6342 WICKSON~ DIANNE RECREATION REFdND 143341 50.00
i172! WIDMARK~ ANNETT~ RECREATION REFUNDS 14334Z 75.00
11193 ZO JOURNALS SUBSCRIPTZON 143343 99.00
6283 ZOLEZIO, HICKEY ROCHESTER/L&qK DR RIGHT-OF-WAY 143344 400.00
TOTAL 1,271,820.52
'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 09-01-99 (99/00)
t
!
I
t
!
!
I
!
I
I
RUN DATE: 09/01/99 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION 14~R NO NARR. AMT.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm mm mm mmm mmm mmmmmmm mmm emu mmmm mmmmmmmm mm mmm mmmmmmmmmummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmm smmmm
m mmm mmm m m mm mm m m m m mm mm
** CHECK# OVERLAP
11~76 SPENCER, KERRY RECREATION REFUND 141~9#
72 MARK CHRIS, INC.
2737 U C REGENTS
BANK TRUST
239 D & K CONCRETE CO
545 RED WING SHOE STORE
239 D & K CONCRETE CO
4635
1
6271
2732
6011
4373
6309
4361
1826
2603
3448
6172
1430
492
22
6318
5807
1291
1135
21~64
4441
1247
6301
4S33
4369
:)341
!001
5164
4735
1223
A & K PHOTOGRAPHY
A T & T
AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INC.
ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES
ABC LOCKSHITHS
ABC SCHOOl_ ~IJ~PLy, INC.
ACO SANITATION
ADAMS~3N, RONALD
ADVANCED COPY SYSTEMS
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
ALL THE KINGS FLAGS
ALL WELDING
ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES
ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOO]CAL ASSOCIATES
AMERIC~kN BUSINESS
AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY
P---~'RICAN PL*.e..~;IN~ ~;~OCIATION
AMERICAN PUBLIC 14~KS ASSOCIATION
APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
ARBOR NURSERY INC.
ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
ARCU~ DATA SECURITY
ARROH TRAILER SUPPLIES
AUTO SPECIALISTS
AVERY DENNISON-FAS80N ROLL DIVISION
BEST BUY CO., INC.
BEST IRON & BRASS
BLAKE PAPER CO., INC.
BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE, INC.
BOOKs ON TAPE, INC.
BRODART BOOKS
BUCKNA~ & A~OCIATE8
BURTRONZCS
CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
CALOLYI'IPIC SAFETY
CAL~ENBE
(~( 141870 -
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
~(( 142474 -
POCKET GUIDE
~ 142746
LEASE PAYMENT
~4 143030
STREET MAINTENANCE
CCC 143107
SAFETY BOOTS
<~ 1432~S
STREET MAINTENANCE
~ 143346
PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS
VEHICLE I~INTENANCE/SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SLIPPLIES
RECREATION ~PLIES #
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
CELLULAR PHONE BILLING~
FLAGS & SUPPLIES #
!~INTEN~dqtCE REPAIRS
DEPOSIT #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES #
OFFICE SLIPPLIES
SUPPLIES
APA i~E8SHIP DUES
APWA MEMBERSHIP
EMPLOYMENT SERVICES #
MAINTEN~E SUPPLIES #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES #
DATA STORAOE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
BU~INE~ LICEN~E REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES #
BUSINESS LICEN~E REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES
M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES
LIBRARY SUPPLIES #
((C 143377 -
LIBRARY SUPPLIES #
CONSULTANT 8ERVICE8
OFFICE SUPPLIES #
CALIF LIBRARY A~DC MTO.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EOUIPMENT #
29.00-
142472
142473* 204.47-
142744
142745* 70.00-
143028
143029* 954.34
143105
143106* 1,309.65-
14326&
143267* 573.85-
143344
143345# 1,302.65
143346
143347 19.1S
143348 O. 64
143349 170.92
143350 93.50
143351 S. 00
143352 122.63
143353 131.67
143354 1,216,00
143355 130.99
143356 19.93
143357 169.74
143358
1433~9
143360 7°400.00
143361 183.71
143362 8~;33
143363 53.00
143364 100. O0
143365 1,752.78
143366 996.69
143367 791.03
143368 349.50
143369 ~6.46
143370 1,373.82
143371 100.00
143372 385.49
143373 79.42
143374 84.42
143375 60601.2~
143376 237.06
143378
143379 1,9~9.10
1433B0
1433~1 1~7.
143382 160,00
143303 947.61
1433B4 6,264.08
CITY OF RANCHO CUC~d~ONOA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 09-01-99 (99/00)
RUN D~TE: 09/01/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~* CHECK~ OVERLAP
68 CENTRAL. CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 143385 771.66
4~S CHEVRON U S A, INC GA50LINE CHARGES 143~1~ 126.04
73 CITRU~ MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTEN~dMCE/~UPPLIES # 143387 4,642.43
74 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL/~UPPLIES # 1433~S 10!.
621~ CM SCHOOL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND 143389 20~. 54
2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1433~0 123.0~
4301 COMPUSA, INC, MAINTENANCE StJPPLIES 143391 940.17
643 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES 14339~ 1,654.1~
2362 COlISERCO, ~NC. SERVICE/REPAiRS 143393 194.
6221 CO0~ COf~TRUCTION RECREATION REFUND 14~4
20~I COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO,, INC. MA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS # 14339~
S5 CUCAMONQA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLING8 # 143400
239 D & K CONCRETE CO STREET MAZNTENANCE # 143401 3,278.05
2B4 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, 1NC OFFICE SUPPLIES 143402
6145 DAVIS, BAH CONTRACT SERVICES 143403 600. O0
616B DEBLIEUX, MIKE CAPIO MEETINO # 143404
60 DELTA DENTAL DENTAL INSURANCE 14340~
4366 DEMCO, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES # ~43406 ~64.76
6276 DEMPSTER, KER! CONTRACT 51~RVICES 143407 S32.00
83~ DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 14340S
41022 EINSTEIN BROS BAGELS #2777 BUSINE~ LICENSE REFUND # 14340~ 3~.3~
1258 ELLIS, dANA REIMBURSEIqENT 143410 146. 13
118 EMPIRE CO. I~E PREPtIUIq~ 143411 801.00
~137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE PROFE~IONAL. ~ERVICES 143412 4,935.00
2510 FAIRVIEH FORD MAINTENANCE VEHICLE 143413 30,
98 FORD PRINTING & MAILING, INC MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 143414 799.47
41023 FORECAST HOME MORTGAGE, LLC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143415 46.00
10B2 FRANKLIN COVEY CO. OFFICE EaJPPLIES # 143416 134.38
6232 QADABOUT TOLlRS, INC RECREATION # 143417 4,491.00
O780 GIANT ZN1.AND EMPIRE R.V. CENTER ~N~TALLATION ~ERV~CE/SUPPLIES 143418 23,07~. 74
41024 GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143419 87.6b
1S70 GOMEZ, RICK REIMBURSEMENT 143420 1~&.41
4014 GRANT, R~TA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 143421 ~0.00
~(( 143424
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 14342~
CONTRACT SERVICE 143426
BUSINESS LICENSE 143427
RECREATION SUPPLIES # 143428
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 143429
EQUZPMENT I~ZNTENANCE 143430
MAZNTEI',,k4NCE BUPPLZES # 143431
IqAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 143432
ttA~NTSN~NCE SUPPLIES 143433
01 # 143434
DEFERRED COMP 14343~
MAiNTENaNCE ~UPPLIES # 143436
MAINTENANCE I~L/PPLIES 143437
~EN'S SOCCER PROGRAM # 143438
BL/aSINESS LICENSE 143439
BUSINESS LICENSE 143440
143422 -
137 GTE CALIFORNIA #
&277 OUZHAN, LESL!E 142. ~0
31S64 HAIR PHASES INTERNATIONAL 10.
5699 HARALAHBOS BEVERAOE CONPANY
1244 HAVEN BUILDINO MATERIALS 3~.21
462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. 753. 71
1~S HOL.LIDAY ROCK CO. ~ INC. 117.61
22~ HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC 317.87
1234 HOSEMAN 907.04
5882 Z C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 ~,767.6S
103 ~ C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-4~7 823.50
41SS ! D BURR 474.48
1218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION OROUP
3736 [NI.AMD EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. 1,238.
31860 ZNSTA CON
31861 INTELICENT 137.07
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 09-01-99 (99/00)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
------........... ...... ........................... .... RUN DATE: 09/01/99 PAGE: 3
V~N~O~ N~ mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmemmmm
ITEM DESCRIPTION HARR NO HARR. ANT.
#* CHECK# OVERLAP
1471 IRON AGE CORPORATION SAFETY ~dOES # 143441 124.94
~616 I~.l~ MEIqBER~I-IXp 143442 90.00
612 dREnCHIRE INC., C.R. V~H!C~ ~INTEN~CE ~ 143443 1,415.27
4147 K~IN b ~IATES, l~. ~I~E g~PLIEg ~ 143444 353. 77
~9 KILO'S C~ZEg RECR~TZ~ B~PLiE8 ~ ~4344~ 306.39
1024 K~H ~T~I~S CO, ANY ~ZNTE~E S~PLZES ~43446
60~ K~, ~ ~~ ~ZCE~E REFUND ~4~47 ~.~
172 KOZL~ZCH, DEBBIE Z~TR~T~ P~YHENT ~4344B 23.40
~85 K~, C~K RECR~TZ~ REF~D ~4344~ l,~.~
193 LAIRD C~TRUCTZ~ CO PROFE~Z~ gERVZCE5 143450 276.00
19~ LANCE, 5~L & L~GHARD AUDIT 5ERV[CE~ ~4345~ ~.~7
6298 LAY~, T~RA 9~[~5 LZCE~E REFUND 143452 2. gO
5~2 L~ ~ELES C~ COLA BTL. CO. RECREATZON ~PPLiEg ~ ~434~3 427.34
31~ LU'~ LZQHT~SE, INC. OZL ~Y~XS 1434~4 243.60
6~ LYNCH, ~]E RECREAT]~ SUPPLIES
7~64 N~LA, ROSARIO RE~D PER~ DEDUCTION ~434~6
2~42 ~ETR~ZT~ HATER DISTRICT DEPOSIT REFUND ~434}7
~l~ HiCkELS ST~ES INC. ~30i9 RECR~T]~ SUPPLIES
58~2 Hi~EST T~E Li~Y ~PLZE5 14~59
2~7 ~]~SOTA ~STERN ~ZNTE~E SUPPLIES ~ 143460 7,479.4B
4374 ~BZLE 5T~E GRIP, INC. E~Z.~NT ~NTAL 14~61 140.13
744 ~T]~ DEFERRED DEF~RED C~ 143~ 2,1~.00
4~2 ~ READERS PRESS LIBR~Y SUPPLIES 14~4 32.48
433 NZX~-E~ E~ZP~ENT VEH;C~E ~ZNT~NCE
~23 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE 8~PLXE~ g 143466 4. 44
~403 OFFICE ~X OFFICE ~PLZE~ 143467 43.01
34~ ~ CALL CO~UTER SUPPLY ~ZNTE~E ~PLZES g 14~6B 426.69
31862 ~T~ZO ~HT ZRON MORKS B~ZNESS L[CENSE 143469 8.43
49~ OTT, LA~A ~TR~ S~.EXERC~SE C~ASS · ~4~70 247.~
1441 P~CZFZC BEC~ ~ZNT~E S~P~E~
1823 PAGENET PAQX~ 8ERVZCE ~ 14~72 ~.12
~720 PER~ PAZNT CO. ~]~E ~PLZE5 ~ 143473 2,059.38
31~3 PXC N 8AVE ~ 322 B~]~SB LZCE~E 1~74
60~ P[TTS, LiSA RECREAT]~ REF~D 14~7~ 84. O0
30936 POTTER, ~EL]SSA RECREAT]~ 14~76
693 P~ERSTRZDE BATTERY CO., XNC. VEHICLE ~XNTENANCE ~UPPLZES ~ 143477 591.61
738 PRAXAIR DZSTRZBUTZ~, INC. ~]NT/RECREATZON SUPPLIES 143478 96.80
440~ PRAxAzR DZ~TRZ~UTZON, ZNC. E~ZPNENT RENT~ ]43479 ~0,23
3907 PRE~T PARTNERB PRE~T HAIL BERVZCEB 14~BO 9~.64
3206 PRX~ZPAL MUTUAL MEDZC~/DZ~BZLZTY ~NBURANCE g X4340~ 73, 0~. 34
6~ PRUDENTZ~ OVER~L B~PLY ~XNT~CE S~PLZE8
2~ R b R AUT~TZVE ~H~CCE ~NT,~PL~ESGSERV~CE
264 R~PH8 ORNERY CO, ANY RECREAT]~ B~PL]E8
301~ RA~ CUCA~OA P~CE DEPT REIMBURSEMENT 14348~ 11,~.~
· 5~3 R~ HOUSE, X~. L]BR~Y B~PLXE9 1434~ 18. 91
~4~ RED H~ S~E BTORE ~FETY B~T~ ~4~7 442.~8
~4~ RED H~ ~E 5T~E 8AFETY B~T~ 14~ 1~. 97
117~ REG;S~R OF C~QHT8 C~T FEE 14~9 ~.00
117~4 REGISTER OF C~YR~GHTS C~YR[~T FEE 14~0 ~.~
~914 REXEL CALC~ ELECTRICAL SUPPL]E~ ELECTRZC~ 8~PLXES e 143491 1,21~. 07
!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LZET OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 09-01-99 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 09/01/99 PAOE: 4
m m m mmm mm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm memmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmemm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmNemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~emmmmmmm
VENDOR NAME ITEM DEECRIPTION NARR NO HARR. ANT,
## CHECK# OVERLAP
S618 RICt-~RDS, WATSON, & GERBIlON LEGAL SERVICES # 543492 21,b63,47
~7& RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS $434~3
3354 ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES ~ S4~94 2,~. 49
626 R~EG, R~ P,, ~. TIRE REPAIR ~ 14~9~ lOl.~
~ ~ ANT~XO ~TERZ~S ~ZNTE~E 5~PLZES 1434~6
1DO ~ B~N C~TY PUBLIC HEA~TH DEPT~ ~[~ C~TR~ SERV[CE~ 14~497 ~0,~.00
132 ~ D~EO0 ROTARY BR~ CO, ~ ~[NT 8~PL[ES 14~ 31~. 94
~B~6 ~C~, C~ ~~ PAINT ~ 14~ 1~.~0
1B~ ~ED TECH. FA%RCHILD TELECOH, ~C TELEP~E SERV%CE~ 143~0 1,4~.33
2~9 ~ERRA P~C%F%C ELECTRICAL C~T. B~%~ C%CE~E REF~D 143~01 16,1~.60
~349 ~F B~[~ L%C~E REFUND 143~2 6~. O0
13~7 ~T · FINAL DAY C~ 5~P~%ES ~ 143~3 ~. 12
317 ~ CAL%F ;O%~ CO. ~T~Y ELECTR[C B[LLXNQ~ 143~4 7,16~.
319 SO CALIF GAS C~ANY M~T~Y GAS BILL5 ~ 143~0~ 8~8.97
CC4 143~06 - 143S07
1432 8~THERN C~IF~NIA EDI~ M~T~Y ELECTRIC BILL~ ~ 143~8 ~9,247.21
117~3 8TADI~ LI~ & A G~MET DELI B~INE~ ~ICENSE REFUNDS 143~09 2~.39
6350 STYLIGHT PRODUCTI~8, I~ O~RPAYMENT OF RESTITUTION 143~10 1,375.
3a32 STEEL~KER~ OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMER8 F~NDATION ~ 14~511 1,~9.94
5281 STERICYCLE, INC. ~PS PR~ ~ 143512 277.40
· 344 T~GET Y~H PR~R~ & D~Y CAMP SUPPL ~ 143~13
836 T~QET SPECIALTY PROD~TS ~INT S~PLIE8 ~ 143514
43~1 TOBIN, RENEE RECREATI~ REIMB~SEMENT ~ 143~15
1919 T~K SP~TS INC. ~I~E~E SUPPLIES ~ 14351& 672. 47
b244 T~-R-~ B~I~8S LICE~E REF~D 143517 351.69
4738 TRINITY DIVERSIFIED; INC. ~PLIES 143518
2737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 143~19 144.00
350 U S POST~STER P~T~E L~DSCAPE NEWSLETTER 143520 1~,~
3437 ~IF!RST ~IFORM SERVICE UNIF~M SERVICES ~ 143521
4~b ~I~E CREATIONS 18T ~ID KITS ~ 143~22 ~80.30
122~ ~ITED P~CEL ~ERVICE ~S SERVICE 143523 17.92
~6bO VI~Y~D WEST RECREATION 143~4 ~.~
499 VISI~ SERVICE PLAN - (CA) M~T~Y VISION SERVICE BILLING 14352~ 8,147.
~870 VLSY~TEMS, INC. C~PUTER HAR~RE ~ 143~2b ~,34~.~
46 VULCAN-CALMAT ASPHALT M~INTE~E 8~PLIES 143527 153.83
478 WARREN & CO., CML LIABILITY CLAIM5 8 143528 54~,32
213 WRXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT S~PLIES ~ 143529
6181 WEST END ~TERI~ SUPPLY RECREATI~ REF~D ~ 143~30
212 WILLD~ ASSOCIATES PROFE~I~ 5ERVICE~ 143~31 ~4.94
675 WY~'S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES 143~32 704.06
&351 XPRESSIONS OF YOUTH BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 143533 1,37~.20
~283 Z~EZIO, MICKEY ROCHESTER/L~RK DR RIQHT-OF-W~Y 143534 3~0.00
#* TOTAL ~72, 134.97
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
August 31, t999
Investments
Certh~=ates of Deposit - Bank
Local Agency Investment Funds
CeflJficates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
Fede~id ~ ~ - ~
Treasury Securities - Coupon
TOtal Investments and Averages
Cash
PassbooldChecking
(r~ included In yietd ca~u~tions)
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Total Cash and Purchase Interest
Total Cash and Investments
To~al Earnings
Current Year
·
Par
Velue
5,310,532.20
14,425,370.16
1,515,000.00
69,640.96
98,320,943.32
1,277,797.93
100,598,341.26
August 31 Month Ending
489,255.61
100,894,968.37
Date
Market Book % of
Value Value Portfolio Term
5,310,53220 5,3101532.20 5.35 368
14,425,370.16 14,425,370.16 14.53 1
! ,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1.53 365
70,323,437.50 71,970,781.25 72.51 1,721
5,565,000.00 5,973,750.00 6.02 724
71,946.77 65,572.50 0.07 7,567
97,611,286.63 98,261,006.11 100.00% 1,322
Matudty Equiv. Equiv.
218 5.102 5.173
1 5.!07 5.178
336 5.730 5.810
1,374 5.721 5.801
536 5.452 5.527
3,104 9.598 9.732
1,048 5.585 $.S63
1,277,797.93 1,277,797.93 1
5,813.93 5,813.93
1,283,611.86 1,283,611.86
98,894,898.49 100,544,617.97
Fiscal Year To Date
984,678.52
t0t,828,351.19
5.69%
I 1.973 2.000
t,322 1,048 5.585 5.663
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted
October 7, 1998. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment
Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end
market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
Run Date: 09/02/t999 - 11:25
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 8ymRe~ V5.01
Remd ¥e~. 500
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
August 31, t999
Page 2
cusip Investment #
Certificates of Deposit * Bank
6385X1KW9 01O40
6385X1NC0 01048
6509-28649 #35 01041
Issuer
NATIONSBANK NA
NAT]ONSBANK NA
SANVVA
Sublet! a~l Average
Local Agency Investment Funds
oooo5
Subtotal and Average
Certificates of Deposit/Nag. - Bank
06050EAR6 01055 NATIONSBANK NA
Subtotal end Average
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331RAA~ 00988
31331RDXO O0996
31331RMS1 01002
3133IRMA0 01004
31331RUG8 01022
3133 t RQ65 01036
31331R2Y0 01042
31331R3Q6 O1O45
31331R4R3 01046
31331RTE9 01052
3133M2U S4 01003
3! 33M6NE4 01035
3133M75EN 01038
3133M86L3 01043
3133MSB78 O1044
3133MO4J8 01050
3133M95Q1 01051
3133Mg6K3 01053
3133MgCG5 01054
3134AILB4 00994
3134AIH45 01000
3134A2PN2 01030
Average Purchaae
Balance Date Par Value
5,310,532.20
LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
14,~02,789.51
1,4t7,258.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAl. FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME lOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAl. HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME I-OAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME I.OAN MORTG CORP,
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
Markat Value
Book Value
03/1111999 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.50 2,000,000.00
05/01/1999 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00
03/1611999 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20
5,310,632.20 5,310,532.20 5,310,532.20
14,425,370.16
14,425,370.16
08/03/1999
14,425,370.16
14,425,370.16
1,515,000.00
1,515,000.00
1,515,000.00
t,515,000.00
14,425,370.16
14,425,370. t6
1,515,000.00
1,516,000.05
03/27/1997 2,000,000.00 1,990,000.00 2,000,000.50
0711711997 2,000,000.00 1,986,875.00 1,999,375.00
01/0711998 1,000,000.00 983,750.00 1
01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,964,375.00 2,000,000.00
05/27/1998 2,050,000.00 1,962,500.00 ! ,999,375.00
12/15/1998 2,000,000.00 1,916,250.00 2,000,000.00
03/16/t 999 3,000,000.00 2,894,062.50 3,000,000.00
04/07/1999 2,000,000.00 1,941,875.00 1,997,500.00
04/28/1999 4,000,000.00 3.843,750.00 3.997~50000
06/21/1999 2,000,000.00 1,981,250.00 2,000,000.00
0!/06/1998 1,000,000.00 987,500.00 1,000,000.00
!2/08/1998 2,000,000.00 t ,916,875.00 2,000,000.00
0!/2!/1999 1,000,000.00 956,250.00 1,000,000.00
03/23/1999 3,000,000.00 2,939,052.50 3,000,000.00
04/06/1999 2,000,000.00 t ,920,625.00 2,000,000.00
06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 2,052,187.50 2,984,531.25
06/21/1999 2,000,000.00 1,984,375.00 1,999,375,00
06/28/1999 2,000,000.00 1,073,750.00 1,996,87~.00
07/!3/!999 1,000,050.00 995,625.00 1,000,000.00
06/26/1997 3,000,000.00 2,999,0~2.50 3,000,000.00
10/22/1997 2,000,000.00 1,953,750.00 2,000,000.00
08/20/1998 2,000,000.00 1,954,375.00 2,000,000.00
Stated YTM 36O Days to Mature/
Rate Moody's Equiv. __M__-*,_.-~ty Date
5.100
5.350
4.900
5.178
5.730
6.620
6.240
6.330
6.220
6.290
5.660
5.930
5.850
5.850
6.375
6.230
5.530
5.510
5.755
5.700
6.230
6.150
8.480
6.040
6.630
6.320
6.060
5.100 194 03/13/2000
5.350 278 06/05/2000
4.900 196 03/15/2000
6.102 2i8
5.107 I
5.t07 I
5.730 336 08/02/2OOO
5.73O 336
6529 938 03/27/2002
6.162 1.050 07117/2002
6.243 1,224 01/07/2003
6.135 1,223 01/06/2003
6.211 1,3~4 05/27/2003
5.582 1,566 12/15/2003
5.649 1,658 03/t6/2004
5.805 1,314 04/07/2003
5.784 !,700 04/27/20O4
6.288 1,024 08/21/2002
6.145 1,223
5.454 1,559 12/08/2003
5.435 1,603 01/21/2004
5.676 1,118 09/23/2002
5.622 1,679 04/0~20O4
0.000 1,751 0~/17/2004
6,077 1,024 0~/2!/2002
6.428 1,7~2 08/28/2OO4
5.957 681 07113/2001
6.537 876 01/24/2002
6.233 1,t47 t0/22/2002
5.987 1,449 0&~20/2003
Run Da~e: 09/02/1999 - 11:25
Portfolio CITY
CP
(PRF_PM2) SvmRe~ VS.01
Repo~lVe~. 5.00
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3134A2XJ2 01033
3134A2N20 01037
3134A3NS1 01047
31364CRP5 OO981
3t364CJ58 00992
31364FC33 01016
31364FG96 01018
3!364GB68 01032
31364GJM2 01034
31364GTJ8 0 t039
Treasury Securities - Coupon
9!28274Mt 01026
9128275H1 01049
Mo~gage Backed Securities
31340IWW7 00071
313606.121 00203
36215WX74 00002
362t 5XZS4 00069
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
August 31, 1999
Average Purchase
Balance Date Per Value
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP=
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
Su_hto~! a..n~J Average 72,068,478.22
TREASURY NOTE
TREASURY NOTE
Subtotal and Average
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
GOVERNMENT RATIONAL MORTG ASSN
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN
Subk~a: and Average 66,623.73
99,639,33t.73
Total Investment~ and Average
Market Value
Book Value
11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 1,934,375.00 2,000,000.00
01t14/1999 2,000,000100 1,945,000.00 2,000,000.00
05/04/1999 5,000,000.00 4,832,812.50 5,000,000.00
11/29/1996 2,000,000.00 1,993, t 25.00 2,000,000.00
05/05/1997 2,000,000.00 1,999,375.00 2,000,000.00
05/04/1998 3,000,000.00 2,045,625.00 3,000,000.00
05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 1,955,625.00 2,000,000.00
10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,923,750.00 2,000,000.00
12/01 I1998 2,000,000.00 1,9t 3,125.00 2,000,00000
02/1111999 4,000,000.00 3,852,500.00 3,996,250.00
72,000,000.00 70,323,437.50 7t ,970,78t .26
1,997,500.00
3,987,500.00
5,~,000,00
06/03/1998 2,000,000.00
56/09/1999 4,000,000.00
6,0OO,0O0.OO
1,996,25D.00
3,977,560.00
5,973,750.00
02/23/1987 8,443.07 8,597.07 6,382.35
09/15/1987 51,260.82 53,166.42 47,370.66
06/23/1986 8,76822 9,001 ~02 8,647.66
05/23/1986 1,148.85 1,182.26 1,171.83
68,640.96 7t,946.77 68,572.50
99,320,~13.32
97,611,28G.63
99,26!,006.11
Page3
5.790
5.600
5.900
6.230
7.070
6.280
6125
5.670
5.520
5.860
5.375
5.250
8.000
8.500
8.500
9.000
5.711 1,545 11/24/2003
5.523 1,231 011!4/2003
5.819 1,707 05/04/2{X)4
6. t45 820 11/29/2001
6.973 980 05/08/2002
6.194 1,342 05/05/2003
6.041 1,356 05/19/2003
5.592 1,496 10/06/2003
5.444 1,552 12/01/2003
5.801 1,624 02/11/2004
5.721 1,374
5.400 334 07/31/2000
5.478 638 05/31/2001
5.462 636
8,219 663 01/01/2002
10.018 4,016 09/01/2010
8.778 62~ 05/15/2001
8.547 561 03/15/2001
9.598 3,t04
5.566 1,048
Ru~ Oa~e: 09~02/1999 - 11:25
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) $ymRe~ V~.01
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Checking/Savings Accounts
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
Cash Subtotal and Average
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Total Cash and Purchsee Interest
Total Cash end Investments
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Cash
August 31, 1999
Average Purchase
Balance Date Par Value
1,255,636.64
100,8~4,~68.37
100,598,341.25
Market Value
1.277,797.93
98,894,898.49
Book Value
1,277,797.93
1,277,797.93
5.813.95
1,283,611
100,544,6t7.97
Stated
Rate
Page 4
Moody's Equiv. MMurtty
1.973 I
5.585 1,048
Ru~l Dale: 09/02/1999 - 11:25
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep{ V5.01
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Investment Activity By Type
August 1, 1999 through August 31, 1999
CUSIP Investment #
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
Beginning
Issuer Balance
Stated Transaction Purchases
Rate Date or ~
Subtotal 5,3t0,~32.20
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
Subtotal 14,225,370.16
Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary}
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
Subtotal 1,858,797.93
Certificates of DepositiNeg. - Bank
06050EAR6 01055
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331HRC3 01027
Tr-.a~ury Secu *nties - Coupon
NATIONSBANK NA
Subtotal
0.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
Subtotal 73,485,{~4.35
5.178
2.000
5.730 08/03/1999
5.500 08/03/1999
2,500,000.00
2,500,0~0.00
3,231,000.00
3,231,000.00
1,515,000.00
1,5t5,0~).00
0.00
0.00
Mortgage Backed Securities
313401vvw7 00o71
31360BJ21 00203
36215WX74 O0002
36215XZS4 0OO69
Subtotal 6,973,7~0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP. 8.000
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500
GOVERNMENT RATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8.500
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000
Subtotal 87,23t.97
Total 100,920,766.61
08/16/1999
08/2511999
08/17/1999
08/17/1999
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,24&,000.00
Sales/Maturities
or Wil~trawals
2,300,000.0o
2,300,000.00
3,812,000.0o
3,812,000.00
1.514,303.10
1,514,303.t0
643.64
447.52
5O4,73
63.58
1,869.47
7,627,~2.67
Page
Ending
Balance
$,310,632.20
t4,425,370.16
1,277,797.93
1,515,000.00
71,970,78t.25
6,973,750.00
66,672,50
t00,838,804.04
Run Dale' 09/02/1999 - 11:25
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep~ V5.01
Rat=oft Ve~. 5.00
APPLICATION
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
DROPPING
YES__u
LICENSE(S)
File Number .............. 355714
Receipt Number ......... 1242063
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 7/12/99 tn
Issued Date
PARTNER
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
RIVFRSIDF
BUDDIES
8153 ASPEN AVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
CA 9173O
7726 MEADOW CREST COURT
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
LOCK.sOD LINDA WILLIAMS/SIMON M
39904 BIG BEAR BLVD
BIG BEAR LAKE CA 92315
RECEIVED
City of Rancho Cucamon
Planning Division
309366
License Tv~e Transaction T~De Fee Tv~a ~ ~ Date Fee
i. 47 ON-SALE GE~aERAL EA PERSON TO PERSON TRANS P40 YES 0 12-JUL-1999 $1250.00 :
2. 47 ON-SALE GENERAL EJ% ANNUAL FEE P40 YES 0 12-JUL-1999 $695.00 :
3, 47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA PRAISE TO PREMISE TRA P40 YES 0 12-JTrL-1999 $100.00 :
4. 47 ON-SALE G~ERA.L EA STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO [ 12-Jl/L-1999 $39.00 :
TOTAL $2084. O0
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? Act, or regulations of the Department pertaini~ng to the Act?
Exitlain any 'Yes' answer to tt~e above quedone, on an atlaJ .:, ant which ~ be deemed pad of ~ application.
App:icant agrees (&) that any manager employed in omsaf~ licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he
will not violate or cause or pen"nil to, be violated any of the provisions of Ihe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date JUL 12,1999
Under penalty of perlury. each 13aeon wt~oee signature COllie.rs befow. oaflilts Ind say~: (1) He is wl al:~l~-.ant. or one of l~e Iko~llcan~. or in executive officer of the
applicant coqaomtlon. named in the foregoing alDl~ilCIllOn. duly auttmdzed i0 mike thl~ ill,lice/Ion on itc bahaft; (2) Ihal he hal reed lhe foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and thai each of the above siatemenle therein made are true; (3} thai no i~aon other than the applicant or il~,llcants hat any ~lmcl or IndlracI interest
in the iDOlleant pt &l:~llcant's business to be conducled under the licenee(s) for w~ich thil application is made; (4) that the transfer application or pro0oaed transfer ~$
not ma¢le tO satisfy the peymenl o! a loan or ~0 fulfill in agreemini entered Into more the~ ninety (gO) days preceding the ~ay on w~ch the Irenefar apl:Nlcatlon is filled
valh I~e Oe~.Dattment Or to gath o¢ e~te.b~ish i prefem~ce to or lot any credtlor Or lreneferor or to defraud Or in,lure any creditor pt tranefero~ (5) thai the transl~,r epoiication
may Oe withdrawn by etth~ ~e a~l~ pt l~e liensee ~th no resull~ng ltablli~ ~0 the O~a~nl.
Applicant Name(s) Applica e(s)
N&L NILAR CORPORATION ~J.~'f -~ 3. ~'~ ;
- ~
GUARNIERI, Lawrence P/PRES/SEC~REAS / ~' ~ t ~
ABC211-AaEached;ABC227,oFollow g~~ / ~~~
ABC ESCROW ,~'~ ~ ~" 4
10350 Santa Monica B~vd. ~220
Los Angeles, CA ~025
ABC 211 (4/98)
/7
Location
Ma'p
Appllcatl;on:
Applicant:
Addreee:
Deecrlptlon:
Type 47 (C~-~le General)
N & L Nilar Co~,tretion; GuarJeri, Lawrence
8153 Aspen Avenue
New reslauranl (under construction); Iransfer of license; new owner
$11e and Sun'oundlna Zonlna:
Site: ~ndustrial Area Spaeric Plan 7
North: Commumly Commercial
South: lndusllrial Area Specific Plan 7
E. eat: Indua~r~al Area Specific Plan 7
Wear: Industrial Area Specific Plan 7
/$
FIPPLI£ATION F§FI
TO:
Department o( A)coholic Beverage Con(to)
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
Cid, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
DROPPING
YES
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE L ICENSE(S)
File Number ..............356662
Receipt Number .........1245237
Geographical Code ........3615
Copies Mailed Date 8/4/99
Issued Date
RIVERSIDF
NO I AGAIN RESTAURANT
PARTNER
RECEIVED
8270 FOOTHILL BLVD AUG ! 7 l~)~
RAI'~CHO CUOAMONGA CA 91730
SAN BERNARDINO Cily of Rancho Cucamon
Y E S Planning Division
~f premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
License T%,De Transaction Tv~e Fee Tvu.e Ma~ter ~ Date Fee
1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 04-AUG-1999 $300.00 :
2. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES O 04-AUG-1999 $205.00 :
3. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO ;2 04-AUG-1999 $78.00 :
TOTAL $583.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations ot the Department pertaining to the Act?N O
Explain any 'Yes' answer to the above ques0ons on an aaact, xrmnt whlch atmjl be deemed pad o~ ~ts aplaaca0on.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have aJl the qualifications o! a license&, and (b) that he
will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of lhe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNAROINO Date AUG 04,1999
U~l~r ~nalty of ~equry, eaeJ1..13eldIon. ~ _" _sq~t?_~re al~l)ea~ belem, cecile& ~ ~ {1) He ms in ~licam. or one o! the lll13941calrtt~, or an e~iecutive officer of
a~! ?~_.n_l..?_o~q~0~l?~n:._~mea~ m.?e to.~egomg &l:WIt~.allll?n. ¢!u~ & .la~l~odze(l to ~ I1~ IL4oiW~I~. on.l!ll INitlair; (.2) thll~ he hall !1~.Cl the linegoing and Imow~ the
co~mnts ~ .r~reo aria me[ each o[ ~no aeov.e Ilatemem$ mar.am mile& am .~/~.; (3) ~ no gemon amer men the ala~aec. am or aOtallaw~ nee any direel Or Ino~,eCt Imere~l
in tr~e apeloam or IDDi~¢anrl Ou~inees to De condtl~ecl unoer the !k:enoe(I) for ~ title lllllailcaeon te mel~: (4) that the Ironat&t aggelcallon or pmpaeed tinnier
w~m In& ue10a~menl or to gain or &etaWIsh a prep&rance ~a or ~or ~,nv cmamw a~ trene~eW m' to dMmua or lequm er~ ctealtor of tmn~eroC, ($) ~1 the starmar
m~y be withdrawn by eliher the apg(acenl or the licertsee wltt~ no reeulllng Ilel~lly to the
Applicant Name(s} Applicant Signature(s)
ABC 211
No. ! Again Restaurant
8270 Foothill Blvd.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Appltcelto~:
Applicant:
Address:
Description:
Type 4t (O~-Sale Beer and Wine)
Chen. Tongshen; Wang. Mei Ung
8270 Foothill Boulevard
Existing business
Site end ~urroundinq Zonln.q:
Site: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan. Subarea I. S0e~alty Commercial
_ : _ \ ' North: Low Residential
· \ ' ; ...... ~ South: Foothill Blvd. Spec~lic Plan, Subarea 1. Spec~alty Commercial
_ - ~, . ! · ~ E~st: Foothill Blvd. SPecific Plan. Subarea 1. Specialty Commercial
West: Foothill Blvd. Spec~ic Plan, Subarea 1. Office
0.08 0 0.08 Miles
parcels
/~/Street Centlines
N
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager
APPROVAL OF SHER1FF'S FISCAL YEAR
1999-2000 SCHEDULE "A"
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council approve the Sheriff's Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Schedule "A" in the
amount of $10,206,299 for contract law enforcement and DARE program services
to be paid out of Account Numbers 011-4451-6028, 01-4451-6030 and Funds 114,
1 I7, and 139.
Analysis
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received the finalized Schedule "A" for Fiscal
Year 1999-2000 in the amount of $10,206,299 for contract law enforcement and
DARE program services for the City from the County of San Bernardino.
Schedule "A" is the financial portion of the City's law enforcement contract with
the County of San Bernardino and is the document utilized to pay for the City's
contract law enforcement and iDARE program services.
The City Manager's office, in conjunction with the Finance Department, has
reviewed Schedule "A" for Fiscal Year ! 999-2000 and recommends it be approved
by the City Council u
R~spectfully~i~t~d,
'~,, , ,
Assistant To The City iManager
Attachment: Schedule "A" for Fiscal Year 1999-2000
o2/
DATE:
FROM:
TO:
SUBJECT:
INTEROFFICE MEMO
July 30 1999 PHONE: 387-3648
ROBERT TREMAINE, SherifFs Services Coordinator MAIL CODE: 0061
Bureau of Administration
ROD HOOPS, Captain F
Rancho Cucamonga Station ' ,
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT
Please find attached five copies of the eighth amendment to the law enforcement services
contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please have the appropriate person with the
city sign all five copies of the amendment and return to the San Bernardino County
Sheriff's Department, Bureau of Administration, 655 East Third Street, San Bernardino,
CA 92415-0061, ATTN: Bob Tremaine, Contracts Unit.
Once the iBoard of Supervisors has approved this amendment, an executed copy will be sent to
the city, and an additional copy for your records.
RWT/lrt ~'~'~
Attachments
do?
GARY PENROD, SHERIFF
July 30, 1999
Mr. Jack Lam
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Mr. Lam:
Attached please find five copies of the eighth amendment to the law enforcement services
contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please sign all five copies of the contract and
return to the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, Bureau of Administration, 655
East Third Stree(, San Bernardino, CA 92415.0061, ATTN: Bob Tremaine, Contracts Unit.
Once the County Board of Supervisors has approved the contract, an executed copy will be
forwarded to you for your records.
Thank you for your assistance in this manner, and should you have any questions please
contact me at (909) 387-3637.
Sincerely,
GARY S. PENROD, SHERIFF
ROBERT W. TREMAINE, Sheriff's Services Coordinator
Sheriff's Bureau of Administration
GSP/RWT/[rt
Attachments
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
655 East Third Street · San Bernardino, California 92415-0061 Post Office Box 569 · San Bernardino, California 92402-0569
County of San Bernardino
FAS
STANDARD CONTRACT
FOR COUNTY USE' ONLY
E New' Vendor Code
M X Change
X Cancel
County Department
SHERIFF
County Department Contract Representative
ROBERT Wo TREMAINE
Fund Dept, Organization
AAA SHR SHR
I
Commodity Code
Project Name
Contract Law
Enforcement FY99/00
Dept.
$C A
SHR
Dept. Orgn.
SHR SHR
Ph. Ext.
(909) 387-3746
Appr.
Obj/Rev Source
9565
I
Contract Number
94-524 A-8
Contractor's Ucense No.
Amount of Contract
$1 O,2O6,299
Activity GRC/PROJ/JOB Number
RANCHO
Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year
Amount I/D FY Amount I/D
THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called
the County, and
Name
City of Rancho Cucamonga I~ereinafter called CITY
Address
P. O, Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Phone Birth Date
(909) 477-2700
Federal ID No. or Social Security No.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
(Use space below and additional bond sheets. Set forth service to be rendered, amount to be paid, manner of payment, time for
performance or completion, determination of satisfactory performance and cause for telruination, other terms and conditions, and
attach plans, specifications, and addenda, if any.)
EIGHTH AMENDMENT
Contract No. 94-524 providing law enforcement service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended,
effective July 1, 1999, by replacing Schedule A, referred to in Paragraph IV, with the Schedule A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Except as amended, all other terms mad conditions of this contract remain as stated therein.
02¢
Page I of 2
[This page intentionally left blank.]
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
don D. MikeIs, Chairman, Board of Supervisors
City of Rancho Cucamonga
(P#nt or type name of corporation, company, contractor, etc.)
By l,-
(Authorized signature - sign in blue ink)
Dated:
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS
DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of: San Bernardino.
Name
Title
Dated:
(Print or type name of person signing contract)
(Print or Type)
By
Deputy
Address:
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Reviewed by Contract Compliance
Date
Reviewed for Processing
Agency Administrator/CAO
Date
Page 2 of 2
SCHEDULE A
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 1999/2000
FY 1999/2000
SERVICE COST *
(PERSONNEL COSTS INCLUDE SALARY AND BENEFITS)
1- Captain $ 127,904
2 - Lieutenant 212,574
10- Sergeam 918,790
11 - Deputy III 879,989
65 Deputy II 4,816,435
2 - Deputy II (D.A.RE.) 148,198
2 - Forensic II 99,676
7 - Sheriffs Service Specialist 291,025
1 - Research Analyst 61,378
3 - Community Services Officer 112,146
I - SecretaryII 41,849
1 - Secretary I 39,639
15 - Station Clerk 569,205
2 - Motor Pool Services Assistant 79,096
1 - Supervising Station Clerk 41,521
30 - Marked Unit 320,370
I4 - Unmarked Unit 96,628
1 - Mini Van (Code 3) 4,406
2 - Mid-Size Pickup 8,478
7- Motorcycle 36,120
1- Marked4X4 14,479
1 - Bicycle Van (Equipment and Insurance Only) 1,502
2 - D.A.R.E. Van (Equipment and Insurance Only) 3,004
Dispatch Services 521,156
Radar Gun 2,924
Administrative Support 58,555
Office. Automation 10,269
Vehicle Insurance 79,113
Personncl Liability and Bonding 255,072
Telephone Report [.Init 77,078
Startup I!;mployee/Vehicles 4,834
County Administrative Cost 272,886
TOTAL COST $10,206,299'
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
MONTHLY PAYMENT SCHEDULE:
payment due July 15, 1999:
ad through 12~ payment due 5t~ of each month:
$850,535
$850,524
* Subject to change due to salary and benefit changes or Board of Supervisors action.
Less fuel and maintenance. City is responsible for fuel and maintenance on all contract vehicles..
Maintenance is defined as all routine maintenance, all necessary repairs (mechamcal and body repair),
and replacement of any destroyed vehicle. If vehicle damage is eligible for coverage under County
insurance policies, a claim will be filed with County Risk Management. Any money reimbursed by
Risk Management will be credited to the City's account to offset City costs.
(07/01/99) PAGE 1 of 3
SCHEDULE A
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 199912000
ADDITIONAL COST BILLED QUARTERLY:
OVERTIME: Overtime and court appearances estimate for FY 1999/2000 is $329,740. Actual overtime
will be billed quarterly.
City will be billed on a quarterly basis for:
Actual overtime cost.
Professsional services from private vendors (i.e., towing, etc.).
Services and supplies above contract formula.
Fuel and maintenance (if applicable).
K-9 Charges: Cost fbr food, medical expenses, etc. (if applicable).
PUBLIC GATHERING:
The following Public Gathering rates shall apply to the City of Rancho Cucamonga when deputies and
reserve deputies assigned to the City are used to provide security at City-sponsored public events and at
City-sponsored public events held at City-owned facilities. Deputies will be provided and claims processed
by use of the standard County Public Gathex/ng Agreement.
RATES
Reserve Deputy $21.66 Per Hour
Deputy II 44.80 Per Hour
Deputy III 49.15 Per Hour
Sergeant 55.41 Per Hour
(07/01/99)
PAGE 2 of 3
SCHEDULE A
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT
LEVEL OF STAFFING GUIDE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 1999/2000
SAFETY:
Captain 1
Lieutenant 2
Sergeant 10
Deputy Ill 11
Deputy II - 65
D.A.R.E. Officer __2,
91
GENERAL:
Research Analyst - 1.00
Forensic Specialist II - 2.00
Dispatcher II 11.56
Secretary II 1.00
Supervising Station Clerk 1.00
Sheriff's Services Specialist 7.00
Secretary I 1.00
Motor Pool Services Assistant - 2.00
Community Services Officer 3.00
Station Clerk 15.00
44.56
VEHICLES:
Marked Unit - 30
Unmarked Unit 14
Mini Van 1
Mid-Size Pick:up 2
Motorcycle 7
Marked 4X4 1
Bicycle Van 1
D.A.R.E. Van 2__
58
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT:
Radar Gun - I
DONATED VEHICLES:
Chevrolet Tahoe - 1
Ford Explorer - 3
Windstar - 1
Chew Pickup 1
Nissan Pickup - 1
Volkswagen - 1
(Included for insurance cost only.)
(07/01/99)
PAGE 3 of 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
I)ATE:
September 15, 1999
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION Ot:: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 1999/00
THROUGH 2003/04 AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN
BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 1999/00 AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE I
FUNDS AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99
THROUGI,t 2002/03
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local Measure
'T' Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan as requested by
SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure 'T' Funds, and approve
the attached resolution amending last ye,'u"s Local Measure 'T' f:ive-Ycar Capital Improvement
Program.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Measure 'T', the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction
receiving program revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and a
Twenty-Year Transportation Plan which outlines tile specific projects upon which those funds shall
be expended.
Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan schedule to be adopted by City
Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational
purposes. The Five-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for spillage and to insure that the
adopted plan contains ample projects fi:>r Measure 'T' expenditures. If changes are necessary
(additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with City
Council approval.
SANBAG has advised us the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan flor Local Measure 'T' Funds can be
a list of projects for a 20-year period or narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects
Local Measure. 'T' Funds are to be used IBr, and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of
J
CITY COUNCIl. STAFF REPORT
Re: FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN/TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
September 15, 1999
Page 2
project. Since it is difficult to list actt, al projects 20 years in advance, staff recommends Council
approve the policy statement.
Various funds were carried over from FY 97/98 to FY 98/99 in the form of purchase orders, and as
such, expenditures occurred in FY 98/99 that ,.'ere not identified in the Five-Year Plan for that
particular year. It is now necessary to amend the previous plan to reflect those expenditures.
WiqJ. Lq~fi J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BRH:Is
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAl. YEARS 1999/00 THROUGH 2003/04 AND TWENTY-
YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL
YEAR 1999/00 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE 'T'
FUNDS
On Wednesday, September 15, 1999, on ,notion by , seconded by
~ and carried, the City Council o[' the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, finds as follows:
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure 'T' in November,
1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax
applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WI-'IEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used tbr transportation imi~rovement and
traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordin,'mce No. 89-1
ot' Authority; and
Wt..tEP. EAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction receiving
revenue t¥om the tax to expend those fu~ds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the. Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction
annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure 'T' Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which is attached to this resolution.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 1999104
YEAR STREET & LIMITS i IMPROVEMENT
99t00 =6th St ~ Archibald to Hermosa Pavement Rehabilitation
iADA Corrective-I~ea~u~S'~ Ci~ ~d~, --~l~te~::tion ramps and ddveway modifications
?pine St / Ramona Av - Arrow to West end Alpine finstall sidewalks and access ramps
,!Amethyst St - 19th to North City Limits ........ iP~v-e-ment Rehabilitation
Cost Estimate ($)
!60,000
104,000
12,000
397,000
!Archibald Av & 4th St Northeast com~}- .....
;Ar~0-~ Ri~ at He!i~' Av
~ Beryl St - Baseline to 19th
Be-ryl St: :Baseline'to ~l~th -
Carnelian St - 1,000' SIO to Vivero St
· !Da_y Creek BI_- Ba~s~!in~i'_~i~-i~d __ _-~
iwiden for right turn lane and decelerati0n lane
Remove crossgutter and replace with storm drain
Pavement Rehabilitation
-install sidewalks and access ramps
Realign curve and drainage improvements
Construct west roadbed to connect to Rte 30 Frwy.
1,000
73,000
295,000
26,000
7~3_,_00~
78,000
Haven Av - Foothill to Deer Crk Ch West Side 'Pavemen{ R~habilitation
Haven Av ~ Foothill to Baseline East Side Pavement Rehabilitation
Haven Av- Baseline to Highland Ph 1 Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain
~H-a~e~Av~Lemon to Wilson - i Paveme-nt RehabilitatiOn
Local Streets - City Wide -!Pageant Rehabilitation
Pavement inventory - City Wide ..... inventory streets t~o determine condition
_~S_a_pp~hi_re St - Moon to Almond Pavement Rehabilitation
. _ ~S_ig_n_al - Arrow & R~ed Oak Install traffic signal
.Vineyard Av - 9'~hto Foothi!l- ........ tnstal! bus bays
'FY ~i00~0tTa!
00/01 ;ADA coEe~t~e M~&~ur~- C~-wicte ;l~rs~:~iCir{ ramps and ddveway modifications
Baseline Rd - Vineyard to Hellman Pavement Rehabilitation ..............
1,000
1,000
523,000
428,000
757,000
104,00~
295,000
1,000
!68,000
3,497,000
........ 1_o_o,_00
.......... 200,000
Etiwanda Av- Foothill to Baseline 'D~sign~e~i~ing and~v~ent rehabilitation ........ ; ........ 100,00o
'Haven Av- Baseline to Highiand _Ph 2 ' ;
.Wi_~den wes_t$ide,~pavement rehabilitat~on: & storm drain 5001000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 400,000
'Millik~n A~ ~,t}~ t(~ 7th Pa-ve t Reh bilita~r~
men a 200,000
FY 00/01 Total 1,500,000
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN t999/04
YEAR ~STREET & LIMITS i IMPROVEMENT
0!!02 iADA Corrective Measures - City~de _ ~Intersection ramps and driveway modifications
i Etiwanda Av - Foothill to Baseline Ph I ---iStreet w~ning and widening of 1-15 underpass
~ .......'~laven Av ~Ba~elin~ to ~ighla'~d -Ph-~3 ..... iWiden ~t si~, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain
Traffic Signals - City Wide .... ~Sign~als an? related improvements
iVViison AwA_methyst to Haven~ !Design street widening and pavement rehabilitation
iFY ~1/0~ 'Total -
02/03 ..= iAOA C0rr _ective a~asures -City Wi~e~ ....... ~!l~{~e~_ _fion ramps and driveway modifications
_?r_c_hib~al_d_Av_- S/O~_a~nya~__t_o~Hillsi?e~ ...... iDesign street widening and pavement rehabilitation
.~ ;EtJwanda Av - Foothill to Baseline Ph 2 Street widening and pavement rehabilitation
...... iHaven Av- Baseline to Highland Ph 4 ..... iWiden. we~t side, pavement rehabilitation, & sto..rm_ drain
~ ~Mtson Av - Amethysi to i-la~ ~ Street widening and pavement rehabilitation
FY 02/03 Total
03/04 ADA-Corrective Measures - cJty~e )ntersecti0n ramps and driveway modifications
......... iArchibatd Av - S/O Banyan to Hillside Acquire right of way
_~Ha.ven Av- Baseline to Highland Ph 5 ~Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain
Haven Av - Baseline to Highland iEast side Pavement Rehabilitation
Cost Estimate ($)
100,000
800,000
500,000
140,000
100,000
1,640,000
100,000
70,000
500,000
500,000
300,000
1,470,000
lOO,OOO
500,000
380,000
__i~lso~ _A_v~--AJ~e~hyst to Ha,~en - !Stree~t wi-dening and pavemen(~ehabili~tion 300,000
~ ~ _~tson Av- Haven to Canistel ~ Strut widening and pavement reha-~Jitation ' =~ ~ ..... ~5-~000
......................... : ' ~,680,~
..... F~e Year Total ; 9,787,0~0'
......................... Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Ym) : 6,9t1,145
~edal
99~00 'F~thill BI ~'~ney~rd_~o Hag-e~ :c~gst~ct ~iagjsl~_~ge
'Con~ct: Ba~e~ Ha~son~iorbMi Engineer ~909~ 4~7-274~, 2330
Page 2 of 2
70 YEAR LOCAl. MEASURE "r' TRANSPORTATION PI.AN
The 20 Year Local Measure 'T' Transportation Plan for the expenditure of Measure 'T' funds
wilI use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as a base. It is anticipated that the funds
will be allocated in the following manner:
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
PERCENT
Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of
Existing Roadways
Traffic Signal Improvements
Street Widening
Intersection Improvements
Railroad Crossing Improvements
Slurry and Chip Seal of Existing Streets
30
10
20
10
I0
20
(See attached City's General Plan Circulation Element)
Figure !11- 3
CIRCULATION PLAN
PfiOPOiED
II.O.w.
LOKAIION
MAJOR ARTERIAL -- - . ........
MAJOR DIVIDED
ARTERIAL "'---"" ..........
EXISTING ~TERCHANGE
PROPOSED INTERCHANGE
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
IrIy. tqlVAT TO 11rlKrEWAy, ~ L~<:AL ACClII
II ~ SEPARATION
[] INTERSECTION FOR
POSSBLE WIDENING
i_ SPECIAL BOULEVARD
~ SPECIAL DESIGN
[-~-~-'] SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE
C~Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. q ~-d~o~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU'NCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEARS 1998/99 THROUGH 2002/03
On Wednesday', September 15, 1999, on motion by , seconded by
, and carried, the City Council of the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, finds as fbllows:
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure 'T' in November,
1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax
applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and
traffic management progrmns authorized in the Expenditure F'lans set tbrth in Ordinance No. 89-1
of Authority; and
Wt!EREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires cach local jurisdiction receiving
revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by' resolution of the local jurisdiction, and
Wt.'tERIir. AS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction
annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, State of Calilbrnia, hereby adopts the Measure 'T' Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which is attached to this resolution.
Measure 1 5-year CIP Projects 1998/03 Amended
Fiscal Year
Year 1 - FY98/99
Project Title
Amethyst from 19th St to North City
Linfits
Day Creek Blvd. From Base Line Rd. to
Highland Ave.
Day Creek Blvd From Base Line Rd. to
Highland Ave.
ADA Corrective Measures, City-wide
Pavement Management System
Inventory
Arrow Rte. From Milliken Ave. easterly
Archibald Ave. at 4th St., northeast
corner
Haven Ave. from Foothill to Base Line
4th St~ from Santa Anita to Pin-N-Say
Carnelian From San Bernardino Rd to
Base Line Rd
Local Streets, City-wide
Haven Ave. from Base Line Rd to
Highland Ave.
Traffic Signals, City-wide
Itnprovement Description
Pavement rehabilitation and widening
Construct major portion of west roadbed to connect
to future Route 30 Freeway
Construct Highland Ave portion of Day Creek Blvd
project
Intersection ramps and driveway modifications
Inventory City's Pavement Condition
Widen pavement on north side
Widen for right turn lane on 4th St. and deceleration
lane on Archibald Ave.
Pavement rehabilitation
Pavement rehabilitation
Street widening and pavement rehabilitation
Pavement rehabilitation
Widen west roadbed including replacing existing
open channel with an undergroun
Signals and related improvements
Cost Estimate
$10,000
$90,000
$1,743,750
$70,000
$150,000
$5,OOO
$287,0OO
$340,000
$20,000
$100,000
$400,0OO
$5,0O0
$100,000
Year I - FY98/99 Total
$3,320,750
I of 3
/ ;~, ,,/
Year 2- F-Y99/00
Year3- FY00/01
ADA Correctwe tqeasures, City-wide
Amethyst. horn Highland to north city limiLs
A~row l'rom Grove to Baker
Beryl ~ ' ,-,
.,: :r,,m Base Line Rd. to t9th St.
Foothill BI from Grove Ave. to Vineyard
fiaven Ave [rom BaSe l in~
Ave. Ph Ph I I
Local S(reeLs, Cid-wide
Tra~c Signals, Oh,-wide
ADA Corrective Heasures, City-wide
InterSection ramps and driveway modifications $ I SO.000
Pavement rehabilitation
........... $'t00.000
Pavement rehabilitation
.............. $500.000
Pavement rehabilitation
.............. $200,000
Design median & street widening $1.000,000
Widen wesi. toadbed including ~eplacing existing open $500.000
channel with an underground storm d~ain '
Pavement rehabilitation
...................... $ 500.000
Signals and related improvemenU
·: - $130.000
Year]- FY99/00Total $].380.000
Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $],00.O00
E~,iwanda Ave. horn Foothill Blvd. To Base Design street widening and pavement rehabilitation
,..,,,e Rd. $ lO0.000
Haven Ave t'rom Base Line Rd. to Highland Widen west, roadbed Including ~eplacing existion o n
A~e: Phl!! .................. channel w~th an underground storm drain pe $500.000
...... , ,-,,~-,,,u~ Pavement rehabilitation
.............................. $~00.000
Year3- FY00/0!ToLal
l'i,,'.l
Year4- FY01/02
I'r,,jc~ r 7
ADA Corrective Measures, City-wide
Etiwanda Ave. horn Foothill Blvd. To Base
Line Rd. Ph I
Haven Ave horn Base Line Rd. to thghland
A,,e. Ph IV
Traffic Signals, City-wide
Year 5- FY02/03
6th St. from Archibald Ave. to Deer Creek Ch
ADA Corre~ive Heasures, City-wide
Etiwanda Ave. from Foothill Bird. To Base
Line Rd. Ph II
H.~ven Ave. from Base Line Rd. to Highland
Ave. Ph V
Contact: ',';alter C. 5t:ckney, ~sc.,ciate Engineer
(909) q77-27q0 ex 2326
lm/~ruv~ment l)¢it·ripriun
Intersection ramps and driveway modifications
Sueet widening and widening or 1-15 underpass
W,den west roadbed including replacing ex~sbon open
,..lid,libel ~,'~til. h aft underground storn~ drain
S~gnals and related improvemenLs
Year 4 - FY0 1/02 ToLal
Design street widening, bridge widening and pavement
t e ha bdlta Uon
intersection ramps and driveway modifications
Const sueet widening
~,'t~den west roadbed including replacing existion open
channel with an underground storm drain
YearS- FYO2/03Total
Heasure I Revenue Estimate (SYrs.)
C'u~t l'.'~timu/e
$70.000
$800,000
SSO0,000
$150.000
$1.510.000
~250.000
$100.000
$500.000
$500.000
$1.350.000
$6,406,683
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 15, 1999
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E Perez, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE
SOUTH 33 FEET OF VICTORIA STREET FRONTI'NG THE NORTHE[U..,Y
BOUNDARY OF TENTATIVE TRACT 15915 WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of the
south 33' of Victoria Street fronting the northerly boundary of Tentative Tract 15915, west of
Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, said Resolution authorizes the City Clerk to cause same resolution
to be recorded in file office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
BACKGRO U N D/ANA LYS IS
On January 27, 1999, the Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract 15915. A
condition of approval of the tentative map required the developer to vacate the south halfofVictoria
Street fronting the proposed tract. Subsequently, on July 28, 1999 the Planning Commission,
through minute action, declared the proposed vacation to be in conformance with the General Plan
and recommended the vacation occur.
Victoria Street was originally dedicated with the Etiwanda Colony Lands Map in December 1883.
The portion of Victoria Street west of Etiwanda Avenue has never been constructed. It is currently
a dirt road that dead ends at the easterly boundary of the Victoria Planned Community. General
Telephone has a conduit located in the northerly portion of the right-of-way. Children currently use
the area as a rou. te to Etiwanda Intermeditate School and Etiwanda High School from the Victoria
Planned Community,
The northerly 20 feet ofthe south half of the street will be designed as an extension of the pedestrian
access through the Victoria Planned Community as shown on Exhibit C. The southerly ! 3 feet will
be incorporated into the Tract as a portion of the private equestrian trail.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
VACATION OF VICTORIA STREET(V-164)
September 15, 1999
Page 2
The utility companies have been notified of the vacation and have requested a 20 foot wide public
utility easement be reserved across the 33 feet wide area to be vacated. The northerly 20 feet will
be reserved as a public utility easement. A lettered lot for pedestrian access over the public utilities
ease,nent shall be dedicated to the City on the final map.
The north half of Victoria Street will be addressed at the time the vacant property north of Tract
15915 develops.
Respectfully submitted,,,
City Engineer
WJO:MP
Attachments
AREA TO lie
VAC'ATED
II
TENTATI V E LL}
~Z
LINE
STREET
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM:
TITLE:
EXHIBIT:
V-164
Vicinity Map
"A"
SOL.rrI4~RLY L,rqE LOT
BI..IC 'F, ETI~ANDA
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM: V-164
TITLE: Victoria Street
Vacation
EXHIBIT: "B"
..... ~ TRACT
........ a_15915
. V!CTORIA'STREE'T
ETIWANDA
INTERMEDIATE
SCHOOL
Z
Z
SPRR
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM:
TITLE:
EXHIBIT:
V-164
Access Map
RESOLUTION NO. ~"~3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ITIE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TO BE VACATED THE
SOUTH 33 FEET OF VICTORIA STREET FRONTING THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TENTATIVE TRACT 15915 WEST OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 99-1812, passed on August 18, 1999, the Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more
particularly described, and set tile hour of 7:00 p.m. on September 18, 1999, in the City Council
Chambers, located at 10500 CMc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and
place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and public testimony
has been received to such vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by tile Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
SECTION I: The Council hereby finds by all the evidence submitted that the south 33 feet
of Victoria Street fronting the northerly boundary of Tentative Tract 15915 west of Etiwanda
Avenue is unnecessary tbr present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby
makes its order vacating that portion of said City street. as shown on Map No V-164 on file in the
office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in the legal
descriptions which are attached hereto, marked Exhibits "A" and "B", and by ret~:rence made a part
thereof.
SECTlION 2: Tile subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if
any, set forth in Exhibits "A" and "B", which are attached hereto and by reference made a part
hereof.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the
office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Califbrnia.
SECTION 4: The Clerk shall c:ertif'y to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and
it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
APN 227-101-04
EXItiBIT "A"
Legal Description
For
Victoria Street Vacation Request
Being a portion of Victoria Street (a 66 foot wide street), as shown on the MAP OF
ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, per plat recorded in Book 2 of Maps, Page 24, records of
said County, more particularly described as follows:
That portion of the southerly 33 feet of Victoria Street adjoining the northerly line of Lot
2, Block "J" of said ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, bound on the west by the northerly
prolongation of the westerly line of said Lot 2 and bound on the east by the northerly
prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 2, excepting the easterly 40 feet therefrom.
Also reserving therefrom the northerly 2.0 feet of said southerly 33 feet of Victoria Street
for public utility purposes.
See Exhibit "B" Map attached herein and made part thereof.
Prepared by;
Derbish, Guerra & Associates
8331 Utica Avenue, Suite 150
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
(909) 98%4306 /O
RCE No. 28476
Expires 03-31-02
Contains 20,142.66 SauareCE~t~':~0.~6.2 Acres)
Date
EXHIBIT "B"
A.P.N. 227-101-04
o ,~o ~o MAP TO ACCOMPANY
sc~ ,'=~o' -~o~' LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
September 115, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
.lack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP 97-03, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD AND RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB, SUBMITTED BY tLALPH
OLIVAS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and
security lbr C.U.P. 97-03 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-03, generally located at the southwest comer of San Bernardino Road and
Red Hill Country Club, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 9, 1997, tbr a request to
construct 701 I square feet of Kingdom [ la[I of Jehovah's Witnesses on I. 13 acres of land in subarea I of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in the Medium Residential District.
The Developer, Ralph Olivas is submitting an agreement and cash security to guarantee the construction
of the improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance (Letter of Credit):
Labor and Material (Letter of Credit):
$15,500.00
$ 7,750.00
Copies of the agreement and security signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted;
William J. O'Neil,
City Engineer
WJO:HM:dlw
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP 97-03
WHEP,,EAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califi)rnia, has lbr its
consideration a.n Improvement Agreement executed by Ralph Olivas as developer, lbr the
improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein,
and generally located on the southwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Red Hill Country
Club; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to trte terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Planning Commission, C, onditional Use Permit 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Calitk)rnia, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be
and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement
Agreement on behalf' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
VIGINI I 1' r~.~r"
...... SAN
.,:..CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOI~IGA
~"' COUNTY OF
,L,:~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY ()F RANClIO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack if, am, AICP, City Manager
Wi!limm .I. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THF~ ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6 FOR PARCFL MAP 15268, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ELM AVENUE AND WHITE BIRCH DRIVE,
SUBMI'VrED BY SM'ITt.~ ASSOCIATES
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15268
and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street lighting
Maintenance District 1 and 6, located at the northeast comer of Ehn Avenue and White Birch Drive,
and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tentative Parcel Map 15268, located at the northcast comer of Elm Avenue and White Birch Drive,
in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7)and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan,. was conditionally approved by Planning Commission on May 26, ! 999. The tentative
map was approved for a subdivision of 3.91 acres of land into 3 parcels. Street improvements are
existing. Parkway improvements will be: completed upon development.
A copy of the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is available in the
City Clerk's ofrice.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:sd
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. ~q-"6~Z~5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR. OVING PAII, CEL
MAP NUMBER 15268
WHEREAS, Tentative F'arcel h/lap Number 15268, submitted by Smith Associates, anti
consisting of a subdivision of 3.91 acres of land into 3 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Elm
Avenue and White Birch Drive, in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8)
Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga on May 26, 1999; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 15268 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by' the City Council of said City have now been met by Smith Associates, as developer; and
NOW, T}-tEREFORE, 'I'HE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ILANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY R[','SOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 15258 bc and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be
filed tbr record.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THt;; CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OI;' CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAIN'FENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP
15268
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califbmia, has previously
tbrmed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the '*Landscaping and Lighting Act
0171972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated 'as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described o.n Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
Wt. I EREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCI:L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION !: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas a.s described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
r..,.,.%. t-t ,t ~'LL L
[.,ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, DISTRI("T NO.
STREET' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND
/
/
I
I
I
I
/
t
I
I
/
I
/
!
J, AJI~I~A ~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A
NORTI I
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 15268
STREET LIGI"ITS:
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Dist.
SI
S6
5800L 9500L
16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Dist.
L3B
Community
Equestrian
Trail
D.G.S.F.
Tt, rf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ilia.
Note: Division of the land at this time.
Parcels I, 2, and 3.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Unit:;
By District
Parcel Acres S t $6 L3 B
I 1.85 3.70 1.85 1.85
2 1.14 2.28 1.14 1.14
3 0.92 1.84. 0.92 0.92
Improvements shall be required upon the developments of
Annexation Date: September 15, 1999
Form Date 1 I/16/94
CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
F P,O M:
B Y:
SUBJECT:
September 15, 1999
Mayor ancl Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 [:OR
TRACT 159I 5, LOCATE[) SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET WEST OF ETIWANDA
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WOODSIDE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
[t is recommended that City Council adopt the atlached resolutions approving Tract I5915, accepting tile
subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUNI)/ANALYSIS
'['fact 15915, located on tile south side of Victoria Street west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Very l.ow
Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 27, 1999, [br the
division of 21 acres into 36 lots.
The Developer, Woodside Homes of Califi:m~ia, Inc.. is st,bmitting an agreement and security to guarantee
the construction of the off-site improvemeres in the following amounts:
Faith fu I Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$1,350,000
$ 675,000
Copies of the agreement and security are available i.n Ihe City Clcrk's Of'rice.
[,cttcrs"ofapproval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga
County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver
to Annexation form signed by the I)eveloper is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectively submitted.
City Engineer
WJO:MEP:sd
Attachments
HICHLAND (STAll:' I..fiCHWA¥ ..',lO), AVENUE
SmE~
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM: TT 15915
TITLE: Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT: "A"
VICTOR)A STRFrT
LOT 'B" PUBLIC ACCESS
I~ .,,' t I~
' ...."I ~,!
I '"~ ~ ' ~
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DMSION
ITEM: TT 15915
TITLE: Lot Map
EXHIBIT: "B"
ctq-d, ?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI.,IFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT MAP NUMBFR 159 ! 5, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMi~ROVEMEN'F SIT. CURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15915, submitted by Woodside Homes of Califomia,
Inc., and consisting of 36 lots located south of Victoria Street west of Etiwanda Avenue, was
approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 27, 1999, 'and
is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act mid Local Ordin,'mce No. 28 adopted pursuant
to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 1591:5 is the final ~nap of the division of l~md approved as shown
on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an hnprovcmcnt Agreement
gt, arantccd by acceptable Improvement Security by Woodside }Ionms of California, Inc., as
developer; and
WItEREAS, said Developer submits lbr approval said Tract Map offering lbr dedication. for
street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, TIlE CFI'Y COUNCIL OF' Tt IE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I..![;.REBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and that the offers for dedication. and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map
No. 15915 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed tbr record.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ot7
R. ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGI'ITING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 3 FOR TRACT ! 5915
WHEREAS, the City' Council of the City of thncho Cucmnonga, California, has previously
tbrmed a special maintenance district pursuant to the ternas of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the: Streets and ttighways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter
retk:rred to as the "Maintenance District'"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to bc annexed to the
Maintcn,'mcc District haw: filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or 1iling of an Engincer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS::
SECTIO.N 1: That th.e above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future procccdings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder,
EXHIBI'F "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
STREET LIGHTING ~ IAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, I AND 3
TRACT
15915
Z
CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NO!tTI !
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: TRACT 15915
STREET LIGIITS:
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Dist.
SI
S3
5800L 9500L
2
33
16,000L 22,000L 27,500I.
LANDSCAPING:
Dist.
!.3 B
Community
Equestrim~
Trail
D.G.S.F.
26733
Turf Non-Turf
S.F. S.F.
6200
Trees
204
Parcel
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSF_.SSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units,
By District
DU St S2 LI
36 36 36 36
Annexation Date: September 15, 1999
Form Date I 1 / 16/94
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY:
Jan P, eynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A CONTRAC:T WITH BROWN, DIVEN, HESSELL &
BREWER, LLP, FOR LEGAL SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $8,250 ($7,500 plus 1.0% Contingency) TO BE iFUNDED
FROM TRUST FUND ACCOUNT NO. 70-276-522
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the iRedevelopment Agency approve and authorize the Chairman
to sign a contract with Brown, Diven, Hessell & Brewer, LLP, for legal services in
connection with the dissolution of Community Faciltities District 91-1, and Improvement
Area No. I of the District. Funding is provided by developer funds deposited into a trust
account specifically for expenses related to this District.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In 1991, the City Council approved a contract with Brown, Diven, Hessell & Brewer LLP
for special legal services in connection with the formation of Community Facilities
District: 91-1 and Improvement Area No. 1. The City Council will consider approval of
the initiating process to dissolve this District as a separate item on this agenda. Due to
the firm's legal experience with other Assessment Districts in the City, and their direct
involvement with CFD 91-1, staff has solicited a proposal for legal services to dissolve
the District: and remove the special tax assessment: from properties within the District
boundaries.
The District proponent and major property owner, The William Lyon Company, was
required to place on deposit with the City funds sufficient to cover formation and bond
issuance expenses. The balance of these lands have been held in a special trust account
pending sale of the bonds, and will be used to pay legal and. any other costs related to
dissoMng the District.
Respectfully submitted,
Liffda I). Daniels
Redevelopment Director
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FRO.M:
Linda D. Daniels,. Redevelopment Director
BY:
Jan Reynolds, Redew~lopment Analyst
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF CONSIDERATION INTIATING
PROCEEDINGS TO DISSOLVE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT 91-1, TO TERMINATE THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY
ASSOCIATED TAXES WITHIN THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AND
TO SET THE TIME .AND. DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution of Consideration to initiate
the proceedings to consider eliminating the authorization to levy a special tax within the
boundaries established by Community Facilities District 91-1.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In 1991, the owners of a majority of the property within the '600 acres which define the
boundaries of CFD 91-1 petitioned the City Council to establish a Mello Roos
Community Facilities District to fiand public: improvements. A majority of the land
owners in the District authorized the issuance of bonds and the levy of special taxes on
the propert:y on March 2, 1992. As a result, the City Council declared the public
necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in 'an amount not to exceed $55 Million.
Shortly following these proceedings, a number of property issues affected the District's
ability to sell bonds. Although the bonds to finance the improvements were never sold,
the tax rate and apportionment have been recorded on the properties within the District
boundaries. Since that time, there laas been a subst'antial change in property ownership
within the district boundaries. The majority land owners have indicated to the
Redevelopment Agency that they no. longer have a need for funding public improvements
as established by Comn~unity Facilities District 91-1. The action to dissolve CFD 911-t
will not preclude any property owner within the District boundaries from petitioning the
City for future consideration of assessment district financing for public improvements.
J
It is therefore recommended that the City Council determine that the issuance of bonds
secured by the levy of the special taxes is no longer a feasible or desirable method to
finance the acquisition and construction of the facilities, and consequently determine that
the public convenience and necessity require that the City Council initiate proceeds to
terminate the authorization to levy special taxes within CFD 91-1.
Through adoption of the Resolution of Consideration, a public heating will be set for
November 3, 1999, at which time the City Council will take: public testimony regarding
the proposed elimination of the special tax.
Respectfully submitted~?~..
L~nda D Darnels
Redevelopment Director
f
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.~Banyan St.. ....... r..i sun'.~Ave. / //
\
LEGEND
= ~ ~ ~ [ ~. ' L ~/= I~unda~ I
Stree~ ,I
CFD 91-1 ~unda~ , ~ - ~ *
~ow
4~ St
0.5 0
0.5 1 Miles
RESOLUTION NO. 99- c~ (~)q
A RESOLUTION OF CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS
CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TC) TERMINATE THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY
SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, previously formed COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 9.1-1
(VICTORIA COMMUNITY) (the "District") pursuant to the Meilo-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Government Code Section 53311 and following)
(the "Act") for the purpose of financing the construction and acquisition of certain public
facilities as described in that certain document entitled '"Community Facilities District
Report for Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) City of Rancho
Cucamonga" approved by the City Council on December 4, 1991 (the "Facilities") and
the incidental expenses to be incurred in financing the Facilities; and:,
WHEREAS, in order to finance the Facilities, the City Council did previously
declare the necessity t:o incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed
$55,000,000, the repayment of which was to b.e secured by the levy of special taxes on
properties in the District in accordance wit:h Section 5.3328 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District did, at a special election held in
the District on March 2, 1992, authorize the issuance of such bonds and the levy of
special taxes within the District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined: that the issuance of bonds secured
by the levy of such special taxes is no longer a feasible or desirable method to finance
the acquisition and construction of the Facilities and has, therefore, consequently
determined that the public convenience and necessity require that the City Council
initiate proceedings to terminate the authorization to levy special taxes. within the
District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the legislative body of: Community
Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as
follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Determinations. This City Council has determined that the public
convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of this City Council to
consider, to alter the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to terminate
the authorization to levy special taxes within the District.
SECTION 3. Area Affected. The area which would be affected by the proposed
termination of the auth. odzation to levy special taxes would be the entire District.
SECTION 4. Proposed Alteration to the Rate and Method of ADp.ortionment
of the Existin~l Special Tax. It is proposed that the rate and method of apportionment
of the existing special tax be altered s.o as to terminate the authorization to levy such
special tax.
SECTION 5. Public Hearincl. A public hearing (the "Hearing") on the proposed
alteration of the rate and method of apportionment of the existing special tax shall be
held at 7:00_P.M., or as soon thereafter as practicable, on November 3,. 19.99, in the City
Council Chambers located at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA. 91730.
At the time and place set forth above for the Hearing, any interested person for or
against the proposed alteration in the rate and method of apportionment of the existing
special tax, including all persons owning lands or registered to vote within the District,
may appear and b.e heard.
If fifty percent (5.0%) or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters,
whichever is more, residing within District, or the owners of one-half (1/2') or more of the
area of the land in the Distdct and not exempt: from the existing special tax, file written
protests against the proposed alteration of the rate and method of apportionment of the
existing special tax, and said protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the value of the
protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings to alter the rate and method of
apportionment of the existing special tax to terminate the authorization to levy such
special tax shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the decision of the
City Council.
SECTION 6. Notice of Public Hearincl. The City Clerk Clerk is hereby directed
to publish a notice (the "Notice") of the hearing pursuant to Section 6061 of the
Government Code in a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the
District. The Notice shall contain the. information required by Section 53335 of the Act.
PASSED, APPROVED, And ADOPTED this
__, 1999.
day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY:
Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A RESOI.UTIiON OF CONSIDERATION INTIATING
PROCEEDINGS TO TERMINATE THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY
SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIiSTRICT 91-I, AND TO SET THE TIME
AND DATE FOR PUBLIC iHEARING.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council 'approve a iResolution of Consideration to initiate
the proceedings to consider eliminating the authorization to levy a special tax within
Improvement Area No. I of Community Facilities District 91-1.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the establishment o:f Community Facilities District 91-1, the City
Council authorized the levy of an additional special tax within Improvement Area No. 1
of the District. Under separate action o.n this Agenda, the City Council will consider
implementing action to commence proceedings to terminate the authority to level special
taxes within Community Facilities District 91-1 boundaries.
The levy of special taxes within Improvement Area No. I is no longer a feasible or
desirable method [he finance the acquisition and construction of public improvements. It
is therefore recommended that the City Council determine that the public convenience
and necessity require the initiation of proceedings to terminate the authorization to levy
special taxes within Improvement Area No. 1 of CFD 91--1. This action does not
preclude future consideration of financing alternatives to assist with public
improvements.
Through adoption of the Resolution of Consideration, a public hearing will be set for
November 3, 1999, at which time the City Council will take public testimony regarding
the proposed elimination of the special tax.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
"7/
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF IMPROVEMENT
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
( VICTORIA COMMUNITY)
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
AREA NO. !
NO. 91-1
OF CALIFORNIA
W,O. 92-86
-- -- --MiLL ER -- -- AVENUE
VICTORIA ~ ~ OARDENS
. ..j
=i
RESOLUTION NO. 99-j/~
A RESOLUTION OF CONSIDERATION: OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS
CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TO TERMINATE THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY
SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF SUCH
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA., previously formed COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1
(VICTORIA COMMUNITY) (the "District") and IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1
("Improvement Area No. 1") thereto pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities
Act of 1982, as amended (Govemrnent Code Section 53311 and folLowing) (the "Act")
for the purpose of financing the construction and acquisition of certain public facilities as
described in that certain document entitled "Community Facilities District Report for
Community Facil, ities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) City of Rancho
Cucamonga'" approved by the City Council on December 4, 1991 (the "Facilities") and
the incidental expenses to be incurred in financing the Facilities; and,
WHEREAS, in order to finance the Facilities, the City Council did previously
declare the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed
$55,000,000, the repayment of which was to be secured by the levy of special taxes on
properties in the District in accordance with Section 53328 of: the Act; and
WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District did, at a special etection held in
the District on March 2, 19.92, authorize the issuance of such bonds and the levy of
special taxes within the District; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the District the owners of certain
property petitioned the City Council to establish Improvement Area No. 1 of the District
in order to authorize the levy of an additional special tax to finance the construction or
acquisition of certain of the Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the qualified electors of Improvement Area No. 1did, at a special
election held: in Improvement Area No. 1 on September 2, 1992, authorize the issuance
of bonds and the. levy of special taxes within Improvement Area No.. 1; and
WIHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the issuance of bonds secured
by the levy of such special taxes is no longer a feasible or desirable method to finance
the acquisition and construction of the Facilities and has, therefore, con, sequentty
determined that the public convenience and necessity require that the City Council
initiate proceedings to terminate the authorization to levy special taxes within
Improvement Area No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. acting as the legislative body of Community
Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community)of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as
follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Determinations. This City Council has determined that the public
convenience and necessity require,, and it is the intention of this City Council to
consider, to alter the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to terminate
the authorization to levy special taxes within Improvement Area No. 1 of the District.
SECTION 3. Area Affected. The area which would be affected by the proposed
termination of the authorization to levy special taxes would be the entire area within
improvement Area No. 1' of the District.
SECTION 4. Prol~osed Alteration to the Rate and Method of ADl~ort:ionment
of the Existina Sl~eciall Tax. It is proposed that the rate and method of apportionment
of the existing special tax be altered so as to terminate the authorization to levy such
special tax within Improvement Area No. 1 of the District.
SECTION 5. Public Hearin~l. A public hearing (the "Hearing") on the proposed
alteration of the rate and method of: ;=~pportionment of the existing special tax authorized
to be levied within Improvement Area No.. 1 of the District shall be held at 7:00 P.M., or
as soon thereafter as practicable, on November 3, 1999, in the City Council: Chambers
located at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730.
At the. time and place set forth, above for the Hearin:g, any interested person for or
against the proposed alteration in the rate and method of apportionment of the existing
special tax authorized to be levied within Improvement Area No. 1 of the District,
including all persons owning lands or registered to vote within Improvement Area No. 1,
may appear and be heard.
If fifty' percent (50%) or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters,
whichever is more, residing within Im. provement Area No. 1, or the owners of one-half
(1/2) or more of the area of the land in Improvement Area No. 1 and not exempt from
the existing special tax, file written protests against the proposed alteration of the rate
and method of apportionment of the existing special tax, and said protests are not
withdrawn so as to reduce the value of the protests to less than a majority, no further
proceedings to alter the rate and method of apportionment of the existing special tax to
terminate the authorization to levy such special tax shall be taken for a period of one
year from the date of the decision of the City Council.
SECTION 6. Notice of Public Hearina. The City Clerk Clerk is hereby directed
to publish a notice (the "Notice") of the hearing pursuant to Section 6061 of the
Government Code in a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the
District. The Notice shall contain the information required by Section 53335 of the Act.
?¥
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF R:A~ (..A"tO {.,[,C :'\i 'I ON (..r.:\
C ()M~ '[L:: N 1 ] '~ 1) E\," ["~ [.. O P M E NT t ) ['".P A R T M['.'. NT
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor ,and members of the City Council!
Jack Lrun, AICP, City M,'magt:r
Williron J. O'Neil, City Engim:er
Monte Prcschcr, Public Work:; Engincer/~
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC., AND NORRIS-REPKE, INC., FOR PUBLIC
WORKS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES I'N THE AMOUNT OF $40,000
FOR EACtt FIRM TO FUNDED FROM 01-4641-6028 AND 10-4637-6028
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Engineer 1:o enter into an agreement with
Associated Engineers, Inc. and Norris-Repke, Inc., for public works construction inspection scn4ccs in the
m'nount of $40,000 tBr each firm to fi,ndcd from 014641-6028 and 10-4637-6028
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Duc to the increase in City Capital Improvement projects ,'red residential development ,and the Route 30
construction, funds wcrc approved in fi~is fiscal 5'car bt,dgct to augment fl~c City's current inspection scr~,iccs when
anticipated increases in inspection demands occur. Staff requested statements of qualifications from and
interviewed five firms. Two firms were selected to provide inspection services based upon their flexibility
to respond and min. imum hours of work require, familiarity with the City and qualifications of and number
of staff available. The proposed inspection services will not be on a continuous basis but rather on a as-
needed basis. The services will be funded from the Engineering Division Construction Management
budget, fund 01-4641-6028, Contract Services, for development and permit inspections and Engineering
Divisions Capital Improvement Project budget, fund 10-4637-6028, Proposition 1 I 1, Contract Services,
for Capital Improvement project inspection.
Respectfully submitted,
William J O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP:dlw
J
¸75
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CI;?CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City F. ngineer
Jeff Barnes, Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendant
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $85,595 FROM FUND 46, AWARD AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXF_.CUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE ADULT
SPORTS COMPLEX SOCCER FIELDS REHABILITATION PROJECT TO THE
LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, OPTI-GRO OF HIGHLAND, CALIFORNIA,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $155,595 ($141,450 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF NEW HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS SOD ON THE
TWO SOCCER FIELDS AT THE ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX, TO BE FUNDED
FROM FUND 46 APPROPRIATION ($85,595) AND FUND 46-4130-9929
($70,000).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $85,000 from Fund 46 and award the subject
contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Opti-Gro of Highland, California, in the amount of
$155,595 ($141,450 plus 10% contingency)for the installation of new hybrid bermuda grass soccer
field at the Adult Sports Complex funded by Fund 46.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In prior years, Engineering staff has worked with the soccer groups (AYSO and CYSA) to improve
field quality and playability by replacing the clumping type grasses with bermuda grass during the
field renovations at Red Hill and East Beryl Parks. Last fiscal year, users of the soccer fields at the
Adult Sports Complex expressed their desire to play on. a smoother surface. Their request prompted
a field review of the fields by the Deputy City Manager, and staff from Community Services and
Engineering. The review team agreed that a resodding project to replace the existing "clumping" turf
with a more playable hybrid bermuda grass sod was the best solt, tion. Quotes for sod were obtained
and labor/materials estimates were calculated using historical data from past soccer field renovation
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ADULT SPORTS COl~PLEX SOCCER FIELDS
REHAB ILITATION PROJECT
September 15, 1999
Page 2
projects. A renovation contractor was contacted as well to obtain budget estimates, and $70,000 was
allocated in this fiscal year's budget for the project. The project is scheduled to begin in September
with the fields completed and ready to play on October 29, ! 999. Proposals were sent out and five
responses received back in the Purchasing Department on August 26., 1999. Two of the proposals
were rejected as non-responsive, and the lowest apparent bidder's total price for the project is
$141,450. In order to complete the project, an additional appropriation of $85,595 is needed.
Additional funds are available tBr this project.
Respectthlly submitted;
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
77
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 1999
Mayor m~d Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William .J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Sigmund M. Dellhime, Management Analyst II
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $28,410 TO ACCOUNT 74-4225-3950 AND
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A CONTILa, CT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A
REPLACEMENT FUEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM MILLIGAN & SONS,
INCORPORATED, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEED $28,410 ($25,822 PLUS
TEN PERCENT CONTINGENCY),,
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $28,410 to account 74-4225-3950 and authorize
the execution of a contract for the purchase of a replacement fuel management system from Milligan
& Sons, Incorporated, in a.n amount not to exceed $28,410 ($25,822 plus 10% contingency).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Currently the dispensing of fuel at the Corporate Yard and the Adult Sports Complex is managed
by a system made by GasBoy Intemational. The system (CFN II) was installed at the Corporate
Yard in 1990 and at the Sports Complex in 1993. The Corporate Yard fuels the majority of the
City's fleet and the SheriIT's Department. The Sports Complex fuels stadium maintenance vehicles
and equipment.
The elementary purpose of the fuel management system is to monitor and control the dispensing of
fuel by employee, department, vehicle, product type, and quantity.. In addition, it can also track
vehicle mileage and. changes ifi ftiel efficiency for use in scheduling preventive maintenance.
According to GasBoy, the CFN !I controller is not Year 2000 compliant (Y2K). Furthermore, the
CFN I! reporting software is not Windows NT compatible and must run on an older, stand-alone,
personal computer using MS-DOS.
City staff' has made several attempts to secure the Y2K upgrades from GasBoy's headquarters in
Lansdalc, Pennsylvania and their local service providers. As of this date, GasBoy has been totally
unresponsive.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
REPLACEMENT OF FUEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
September 15, 1999
Page 2
Since the fueling system is a critical component of the city's infrastructure, staff solicited quotes
from local vendors. The vendor (Milligan & Sons, Inc.) for Trak. Engineering submitted a quotation,
technical infom~ation, and identified nearby municipal users of their product. After reviewing this
information and checking with other cities using the Trak Engineering system, staff recommends
City Council approve the proposal from Trak Engineering for the installation of a new fuel and
management system.
Southem Calitbmia cities using Trak Engineering include Ontario, Fontana, San Bernardino, Buena
Park, La Mirada, Newport Beach and San Clemente. These cities have indicated that the system is
reliable and their local representative, Milligan & Sons, Incorporated, responds quickly and
knowledgeably to their service calls.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SMD
CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15. 1090
'['{):
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack L, anl, AIC'P, Cil)' Nlraroger
[:R()M:
I.i Y:
S tJ B.I ECT:
William J. (.)'Ncil. City Engineer
Jerry A. D.yer, Associnte
APPi~.()VA[, OF A I'ROI:[iSSION~L S[iRVICJiS A(iI{I!EMJLNT WITll SB&O, INC., TO
PROVIDJi "i'()I)()CiRAI'IIICAL, DESICiN S[IRVI.~Y FOR PROPOSED STREET
1MPROVI[.iMI~iNTS FOR EIGHT DIFFI~RI~iN[' IA)(..'ATI()NS (See Vicinity Map)
TtlROt. K]t IOU"I' TI IE CITY. TC)BE FLJNDI~D [:R()M TI I1;~ Ff)!.L.()WING ACCOUNT
NOS.: 10-4637-9907 Milliken ($5,005), 10-4637-0906 Bas~ [,Jtl¢ ($2,605), 32-4637-9928
Arrow ($880), 10-4637-9314 Carnelian ($4,(.)15). 10-4637-g904 6th Street - Haven to
Milliken (,$4,950}, I0-4637-9905 6th Street- Milliken to [-I>ssop ($6325). 10-4637-9903
8lh Strccl ($J.)6()), and >~
__-.46.) 7-95 J I Etiwnnda ($5,049)
I~ECOMMEN!)AT!ON:
It is r¢comme]ldcd that tile (.'it,," C'ouncil approve tile Protgsskmal Sc~x'iccs Agreemorn and an additional 10%
contingency with SB&() Inc.. 1o provklc topogral~hical design survey' lbr proposed street improvements for
cighl dil'fgrcnt locations throughou, t the Cily, and authorize the Mayor Jo sign said agreement and Ihc City
C'[crk to attest thereto.
iIA£~,K(;R()UN!)/ANAI,YSIS:
F, cqucsts {br prol,~osals to provklc topogr:lphical dcsign sun,'cy Jbr various Iocalio.s throughout tile City were
sent to six engineering consulting firms. All six firms are on the Cit,v's prc-qualiticd list tbr providing survey
services. Five firms responded, SB&O. {no., HARO Engineering., Wagner PacitSc. [no.. L.D. King. Inc., and
Dcrbish, Guerra and Associates. SB&O. Inc. proposal met all of tile City's requirements at the lowest cost.
SB&C). Inc. proposal is $29,890 :lnd staff' is B:qucsting a 10% contingency tbr a total of $32,879 to be fimded
from the t:b!lowing i:lCCOtttll ilos.: 10-4637-g907 Milliken ($5,005), 10-4637-9906 Base Line ($2.695), 32-
4637-9928 Arrow (588()), 1(')-4637-0314 Carnelian ($4,015), 10-4637-09{)4 6Ih Slrcct - Jlaven to Milliken
($4,950), 10-4637-9905 6th S,I, rect- Milliken to ttyssop ('$6,325), 10-4637-,g903 8tll Street ($3.960), and 22-
4637-95I I 17, tiv,'anda ($5.04g).
Res'p~ully submitted,
WilHOtfi J. O Nei[
C'ily Engineer
% J( ):JAD
Al:t;lCJllll cllt.s
UPLAND
EXHIBIT "A"
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
(~-- Milliken Avenue - From 4'b St, reet to 7'b Street
Base Line Road - From Vines ard Ave. to Hellman Avenue
O(~)__ Arrow Route Drain- Arrow ~oute ,,vest of Hellman Avenue
and south on Hellman Avenue.
~ O Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road
] v~. ,,~ QO-- 6"' Street-From Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue
---~-__l~ 6'~ Street - From Milliken Avenue to Hyssop Street
i (~)-- 8'~ Street - From Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue
!-
'~'~'" ~ .~ ' (~)"' Eftwanda Avenue - From 6'~ Street to Arrow Route
- i .,
: ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... FONTAN,
~II
J ' . CI~ OF
'' ' CUCA~ON~A
ONTARIO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
[)ATE:
'170:
FROM:
By:
S[.JBJECT:
April l 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of llhc City Council
Jack Lan~, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Dave Blevins, Associate Engineer'
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE RENEWAL
AGREEMENT FOR TEMPOIL,kRY DEBRIS STORAGE ON CALTRANS
PROPERTY AT BERYL AND HIGHLAND AVENUES
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk
and Mayor to sign the Lease Renewal Agreement for temporary debris storage on behalf of the City.
11ACKG ROUNI)/ANA LYSIS:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been leasing 2.8:0 acres of Caitrans property for a temporary
transfer site o f debris fbr several years. The property is located at Beryl and tligh[and Avenues south
of Beryl F'ark. The property is within the new l¥ccway rights-of-way and is subject to construction
in. June of 200'0..
The current agreement i.s a 'long ternf renewable lease. Due to the imminent construction of this
property, Caitrans has generously offered a replacement Lease Agreement based on a 'month to
month' tenancy.. However, it is understood, the City will need to vacate the site by May of 2000,
or sooner, upon our acquisition of a substitute site.
Respectfully submitted,
WI ham J ONe~I
City Engineer
WJO:DB
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A [.EASE RENEWAL
AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTAT[ON
WHEREAS, the C~ty of Rancho C ucamonga has a current Lease Agreement dated December
2, 1994 (C.O. No. 95-007) with the State of California Department of Transportation tbr use of
Freeway rights-of-way for temporary storage of materials; and
WHEREAS, said rights-of-way is sub:iect to constrt, ction within 12 months; and
WHEREAS, the current Lease Agreement expired on August 3 l, 1999 and is a long tem~
Lease which the State can no longer honor tBr renewal; and
WHEREAS, the State has proposed a mutually agreed, Month-to-Month basis Lease
Agreement using the current lease terms, covenants and conditions, until vacation is imperative t~r
future construction of said rights-of-way.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to the month-to-month basis term Lease
Agreement proposed by the State of Cal:ifornia department of Transportation.
Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are directed to sign said Lease Renewal Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
CITY ()1: RANCI[()
STAFF REPORT
[)ATE:
September 15, 1999
TO:
Mayor aqd Members of the City Counc:il
Jack [.am, AICi'. City Manager
FROM:
BY:
S U BJECT:
William .I. O'Neil. City Engineer
l.inda R. Beck..h'. Engineer
ACCEPT' IMPROVEMF. NTS, RELEASt-; TI IE FAITI!IFUI. I~ERFORMANCE BOND,
AN D FILE A NOHCi'; OF COMPLETION FOR IM PROVEM ENTS FOR PARCEL MAP
14022, IA)CATE D ON TIIF~ NOP, TH WEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND
FOOTHILl. [?,OULEVARD, SUBMH'I'ED lily LEWIS I)!:iVELOPMENT COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements lbr Parcel Map 14022 have been co,npicted in an acceptable manner. and it is
recommended that the City Council accelat said improvements. authorize the City Engineer to lilt a Notice
of' Cornpict ion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faith fid Pcrlimnancc Bond.
IIAC KG ROU N D/ANA LYS IS:
As a condition of approval of completion el'Parcel Map 14022. located o, the msrthtvcst corner of Rochester
Avenue and Foothill [Ioulcvard . the applicant xvas required to complete street improvemeals. It is
recommended that City Cottaoil release the existing !:aithfi~I Pcrfbrmancc Boml.
i)evclopcr:
Lewis Development Company
I 156 North M:ountain Avenue
{.lpland. CA 91785
Release:
Faithful Pertbrmance Bond 415676S
$727.020.00
Accept:
Maintenance Bond
1112 7324140
$ 25.6(}0.00
Respectfi~lly submitted,
City Engineer
WJ():[,Rfil: Is
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
m::.so[..u'rloN NO. ~}",.c.,~/c~
A Rl.,~S()I.[.ITION ()F TI.IE CITY OF RAN('[I()
CtJC'AM()N(';A. (?ALIFORNIA, ACCI,:PTIN(; Tl!I:~
PI.J[/l..IC IMPROVI~MI~NTS [:OR PARCI):L MAI' 14022.
AND AU'I'I!()RIZING TIlE FI[.I:N(i (')l: ,A N()TIC[.: ()I,'
C()M PLETI(..)N F()R TIlE WORK
W[t[:.I'~.EAS, the construction of public improvements tbr l'arcci Map 14022,
have been completed to the satisfitction of the City Engineer; and
WII[!iI~.EAS. a Notice of Completion is required to bc 1ilcd. certilying the
work complete.
NOW TH EREFORI).'. bc it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the
City Engineer is authorized tO sign and file a Notice o1' Completion with the County
Recorder o f San Bernardino County.
CFFY (7)1': RANCHO C[.;CAMONGA
STAFF 'REPORT
DATE:
Scptcmbcr 15, 1999
TO:
Mayor ,and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Mmmgcr
FROM:
BY:
Willian~ J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Monte Prcscher, Public Works Enginccrt/rt
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE WINDROWS PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY
LIGHTING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 99-045, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE TIlE
BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION AND APPROVE 'D'tE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $201, t88.80
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the City Council accept the Windrows Park and Pasco Walkway Lighting Project,
Contract No. 99-045, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to filc a "Notice of Completion" and release
the F,'fithfui Performance in the amount of $216,066.40 and authorize the release of the Labor m~d Macrials
Bond in the amount of $216,066.40 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been
received. Also, authorize the release of fire retention in the amount of $9,619.44, 35 days after the approval
of the final contract amount of $20 I, 188.80.
BACKG ROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subjcct project has bccn completed in accord,'mcc with the approved plans and specification and to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The tSnal contract amount, based on project documentation, is
$201,188.80, which includes onc (1) contract change order' in the amount of $4,764.00 for replacement of
lighting bailast in existing light fixtures, addition to footings and rclocation of existing irrigation piping.
The original ,'unount approved by Council was $216,066.40.
Dcvcloper:
Coons Construction
12773 Arena Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
Release:
Accept:
Faithful Performmine Bond
I.,abor m~.d Materials Bond
NO. 83224
NO. 83224
$216,066.40
$216,066.40
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP: dlw
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 9 e -o~ ] 3
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL/NCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOKNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOK WINDROWS PARK AND PASEO
WALKWAY LIGHTING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 99-045 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Windrows Park And Paseo
Walkway Lighting Project, Contract No. 99-045 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certiI~,ing the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Donald Granger, Planning Technician
SUBJECT:
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-03 - CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
-The consideration of a request to require wireless communication providers to
install facilities that would not interfere with the City's 800 MHz public safety radio
communications system.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment as shown in the attached
Ordinance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a partner in an 800 MHz radio system operated by the West
End Communications Authority (WECA) that provides vital communications during or after
emergencies or natural disasters. This ordinance was necessitated because the Executive Director
of WECA, Thomas Beltram, has requested the City to incorporate language into the permitting
process ensuring that the wireless communication facilities built within the City will not interfere with
the WECA system. The provisions of the ordinance are outlined in the attached Planning
Commission Staff Report. Also, attached are the minutes from the Planning Commission's public
hearing.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No
correspondence or calls have been received regarding this item.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DG:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Cornmission Staff Report and Minutes dated July 28, 1999
Exhibit "B"- Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-76
Proposed Ordinance
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 1999
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Donald Granger, Planning Technician
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-03 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to require wireless communication providers to
install facilities that would not interfere with the City's 800 MHz public safety
radio communications system.
BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a partner in an 800 MHz radio system
operated by the West End Communications Authority (WECA). The system is vital to
provide communications during or after emergencies or natural disasters. The City is in
receipt of a letter from Thomas Beltram, Executive Director for WECA, describing a recent
breakdown of the 800 MHz public safety communication system due to interference from a
wireless communication facility. The Fire Protection District also contacted staff in support
of this amendment.
ANALYSIS: Certain wireless communications facilities, including, but not limited to, paging
systems and cellular and digital telecommunications, operate at frequencies in close
proximity to the 800 MHz utilized by the public safety communications system. WECA has
requested participating cities to incorporate language into the permitting process to ensure
that communication providers are aware of the 800 MHz public safety system and that
networks built within the City would not interfere with the WECA system.
Staff has drafted a Resolution that would add a performance standard to Section 17.26 of
the Development Code (Regulations for Wireless Communications) that would require any
wireless communication facility to not interfere with the public communications system,
including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The amendment is exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970., as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3).
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin newspaper.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 28, 1999
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends thatthe Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution Recommending Approval of the Development Code Amendment 99-03 to the
City Council.
Res
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DG:taa
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter dated May 17, 1'999, from West End Communication
Authority Executive Director, Thomas. W. Beltram
Exhibit "B" - Resolutiion Recommending Approval of DCA 99-03
May 17, 1999
END COMMUNICAT"IONS AUTHORITY
9330 Baseline Road · Suite 203 · Rancho Cucamonga 91730
Office Phone: (909) 466-7210 · FAX: (909) 466-7213
MAY 2 6 ::5"~J
~R CEIVED
JUN 0 8
TO:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MR. LEE MC DOUGAL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, CITY OF MONTCI.~,rtnirtg Division
MR. G. MICHAEL MILHISER, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF UPLAND, MR. GLEN
ROJAS, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF CHINO, MR. JACK LAM, CITY MANAGER,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVlONGA
FROM:
SUBJECT:
THOMAS W. BELTRAM, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NEXTEL INTERFERENCE
We recently experienced an interference problem on our 800 MHz backbone system from a radio
site owned and operated by Nextel, Inc. The problem, which occurred in the City of Onlado
effectively, eliminated portable radio coverage within a radius of about 1/2 mile around the Nextel
site. The problem was reported to Nextel whose technical staff quickly resolved the issue.
Portable coverage in the area was restored on the WECA backbone.
A similar problem was reported on a public safety system in Washington County near Portland,
Oregon. I contacted the Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency (WCCCA) to
discuss the metier and to compare notes. The WCCCA system is similar in size to San
Bernardino County's. They report that due to design problems their system had portable
coverage problems. Nextel was licensed to two hundred twenty nine (229) of the six hundred
(600) available frequencies in the area. The Nextel licenses included an 800 MHz frequency
range which was close enough to those of the public safety system Io potentially cause
interference. After the Nextel system was installed, public safety coverage problems became
much worse. The technical staff of WCCCA reports that it has been working toward a solution
with Motorola and with Nextel for the past four months with mixed results.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Is the agency charged with the
responsibility for resolving interference problems. Despite the public safety Implications
of this issue and since Nextel had legal licenses to provide service in the area, the FCC
recently ruled it would not intervene in the matter.
I want to emphasize that to date we have experienced only one such problem and it was solved
quickly to our satisfaction. In light of the aforementioned FCC decision, I believe it is prudent to
protect the backbone system whenever possible. I am therefore requesting that language be
added to each City's permitting process to ensure that communications companies are aware of
the 800 MHz public safety system and they agree that any network built within the City will not
interfere with the WECA system..
",."
"Serving theWest End Public Safety Agencies"
He suggested that the vacated property be incorporated into the project and leave the Droll'~
property status quo and the wa~l intact.
Mada Droll, 680 Sard Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated her wall is a retaining wall Sl'e said she
does not want the additional property and just wants to keep what she has. She observed that
utility meters are Iocat*ed on the other side of the wall and the utilities have frequentlydug up the
area. She asked how they would access the area if the project ple~ "well: c,.Ij~ent to hers and
suggested a gate could be used to allow utility vehicle access.//
Headng no further testimony, Chairman, McNiel closed the pub 'c hearing.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a realignment could be made so it would not be necessary to
modify Mrs. Droll's property.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stat~'~0~e knuckle of Hamilton Street appears to be situated
within the current right-of-way. He ind;b, ated it. has been determined that Hamilton Street will not
be pushed through to the west; therefore, the excess street right-of-way is being vacated back to
the original property owners, which mu,~t be done by law. He noted the property had been deeded
to the City at the time her tract was buil~. He suggested the property owners could process a iot
line adjustment with Mrs. Droll deeding tl~t property to the developer to incorporat,e. into his project
as a part of the side yard of the house on'~that lot and that would mean Mrs. Droll s property and
wall would remain status quo. ~,
Commissioner/-r'~lstoy wanted to make sure,the situation is worked out to Mrs. Droll s satisfaction.
/
Commissioner Mannedno requested the condition be amended to have the developer take back
and maintair~the vacated portion.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tol=stoy, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt
the resolution. a~proving Time Extension for Tentative Tract 14162 with modification to require the
developer to prd~ess a lot line adjustment concurrent with the vacation of existing Hamilton Street
right of way to tl~e satisfaction of the adjacent property owner. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: MANNERINO,, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MAClAS - carded
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMEN DMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request
to require wireless communication providers to install facilities that would not interfere with
the City's 800 MHz public safety radio communications system.
Donald Granger, Planning Technician, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel asked if the City has experienced any problems.
Mr. Granger replied he was not aware of .any problems in the City, only the potential for problems.
Planning Commission Minutes
-6- July 28, 1999
Commissioner Stewart suggested additional language be added to indicate that if a wireless
communication facility is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, that the wireless
facility would immediately cease operations until the problem is resolved to the City's satisfaction.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that would be a good idea.
Chairman McNiel agreed that any interference needs to be stopped immediately.
Michael Estrada., Deputy City Attorney, felt the existing verbiage would be sufficient to allow Code
Enforcement to cite immediately; however, he agreed the language could be expanded.
Chairman McNiel opened the public headng. There. were no comments, and he closed the
headng.
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to adopt the resolution recommending
approval of Development Code Amendment 99-03 with modification to require the immediate
cessation of operations of any wireless communication facility which is found to interfere with the
public safety radio communications system until the problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the
City. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MANNERINC, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MAClAS - carded
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND T~M~= EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 97-13 - FOOTHILL PROPERTIES., LLC - A request for a time extension of
previously approved master plan for a retail shopping center consisting of design
116,394 square feet of leasable space on, 11.75 acres of land under the
Commercial designation of the Industdia! Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), between
Spruce and Elm Avenues on, the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: through
69. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 15044.
Commissioner Mannerinc recused himself from hearing the
services for one of the applicants.
he has performed legal
Larry Henderson,. Principal Planner, presented the
Chairman McNiel opened the
Carol Plowman, Lee and Associ; 3535 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, stated she was
representing the owner who not be present. She said the applicant is trying to design a
project that will be economically ~i:ble and beneficial to all. She reported the applicant met with
staff approximately 60 discuss the possibility of a mixed use with perhaps a high-end
senior center, resttab'rants, and a banking facility. She remarked that retail demands along Foothill
Boulevard are n~ as high as anticipated and Lewis is having trouble leasing buildings on the north
side. She said tl~e new buyer has determined there is not a sufficient demand for full retail on their
site. /,.,t
rther testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 28, 1999
?¥
RESOLUTION NO. 99-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-03, REGARDING
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recital's.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code
Amendment No. 99-03, as described in the tifie of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 28th day of July, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
headng on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng on the 28th day of July, 1999, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
c. The City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes an 800 MHz trunking system for its public
safety radio communications. This backbone system is critical for providing communications dudng
or after emergencies and disasters. The proposed amendment is necessary to assure that there
is no interference. with the public safety radio communications system.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district., in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
bo
Code; and
This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
'B~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-76
DCA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 28, 1999
Page 2
Code; and
That the subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development
e. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. 99-03 to
add a new section as follows:
"17.26.075 - Performance Standards
No wireless communication facility shall interfere with the public safety radio
communications system, including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system.
If such facility is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, it shall
immediately cease operations until such time as the problem is resolved to the
satisfaction of the City of Rancho C.ucemonga."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
""':
I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1999, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: MANNERI'NO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ORDINANCE NO. ¢ b~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-03,
AMENDING TITLE 17 OF 'THE RANCHO CUCA.MONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING A SECTION TO CHAPTER 17.26, ESTABLISHING
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a partner in the 800 MHz radio system operated by
the West End Communication Authority that provides essential public safety communications
during or after emergencies or natural disasters.
2. The West End: Communication Authority has requested participating cities to incorporate
language into the permitting process to ensure that wirel,ess communication networks within the
City would not interfere with the 800 MHz radio system.
3. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted
and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on July 28, 199.9, as required by law, with respect to
adoption of this Ordinance and following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.99-76
and has recommended adoption of this Ordinance as set forth below.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and
concluded a duly noticed public hearing on September 15, 1999, as required by law, with respect
to adoption of this Ordinance.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and ordain as follows:
Section 1: The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this ordinance are true and correct.
Section 2:: The City' Council hereby' finds and determines that the adoption of this Ordinance
is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061, (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of
Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
Section 3: The modifications to Title 17, as set forth herein, are in conformance with the City's
General Plan.
Section 4: Section 17.26.075 is hereby added to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code to read as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 99-03 - CITY OF R.C.
September 15, 1999
Page 2
"17.26.075 - Performance Standards
No wireless communication facility shall interfere with the public
safety radio communications system, including, but not limited
to, the 800 MHz trunking system. If such facility is found to
interfere with the public: safety radio system, it shall immediately
cease operations until such time as the problem is resolved to
the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga."
Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published as required by law.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack [,am, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
ORDINANCE ON USE OF THE CITY SEAL AND LOGO
RECOMMENDA~£~
In a review of all City materials, we found that we did not have registered copyrights or other
protection against unauthorized use oftbe City seal or logos. It is recommended that the City
Council approve the attached ordinance, which prohibits unauthorized use of the City's seal or
logos. The intent is to provide a mechanism that makes the unauthorized use of the seal or
logo illegal to help prevent confusion on the part of the public as to what is an actual City
document or publication.
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no specific provision in the municipal code prohibiting unauthorized use of
the City seal or logos. While this has not been a major problem, cases arise from time to time
where the public has been confused to believe that an event, .service or product is being
sponsored by the City because of the unauthorized use of the logos or seal on documents, ads
or other printed material. Whether the deception is intentional or not, this confusion is
detrimental to the effective operation of the City.
City Seal Librctr3, Logo City Logo
The proposed ordinance specifically prohibits unauthorized use of the logos or seal in such a
way as to cause a person to reasonably believe that the City generated the document beating
the seal or logos.
ORDINANCE ON THE USE OF THE CITY SEAL AND LOGO
September 15, 1999
Page 2
A recent example of this type of unauthorized use was a private company that was painting
street addresses on people's curbs for a fee. Their material used a City logo and caused some
residents to believe that the service was being provided by or endorsed by the City. An
example of a use that would be permitted would be in conjunction with newspaper articles that
used a City logo or seal as a graphic to accompany the article.
The applications for copyright registration for the City seal and logos are pending. The
proposed ordinance will provide an added measure of protection by clearly stating the City's
intent and providing fbr a local remedy. However, once the copyright registrations have been
accepted we can also seek injunctive relief in court if necessary.
This ordinance clearly states our intent that the City seal and logo are not to be used in a way
to confuse the public. This ordinance also gives us the tool to use to stop such an unauthorized
use should it occur. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/
ORDINANCE NO. 610
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REGARDING THE. CITY SEAL AND LOGOS AND
AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 2.56 thereto to read as follows:
Chapter 2.56
USE OF THE CITY SEAL AND LOGOS
Sections:
2.56.10
2.56.20
2.56.30
Declaration of intent.
Prohibited Acts.
Definitions.
2.56.10 Declaration of intent. Prior to the adoption of this
chapter, there was no mechanism by which the City could prevent confusion
on the part of the public if the City's seal or logos are used without
authorization so that members of the general public would reasonably
believe that a document bearing the seal or logos was generated by the city
or that the person or entity responsible for creation of the document is
employed by or affiliated with the city. In the absence of the adoption of this
chapter, the public could become confused, deceived or misled by such
documents, which is detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare and
the effective operation of thE; city.
2.56.020 Prohibited Acts. No person who is not an officer,
employee or agent of the city shall place any limitation or replication of the
city seal or logos on any document so as to cause another person to
reasonably believe that the document bearing the seal or logos was
generated by the city or that the person or entity responsible for creating the
document is employed by or affiliated with the city. Any person who violates
the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be
subject to the penalties specified in chapter 1.12 of this code.
2.56.030 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the
following words shall have the meanings set forth below:
A. "Document" means any handwritten, typewritten, printed,
photostatted, photocopied, or computer generated form of communication or
representation, including letters, words, pictures, symbols or combinations
thereof.
B. "Person" means any natural person, firm, association,
organization, partnership, business trust, corporation, or limited liability
company.
C. "Seal" means the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that
are displayed on official city-approved proclamations, resolutions, the city
website, and other documents.
D. "Logos" means the logos of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga
that is displayed on official city-approved documents and stationery.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall~ not affect the validity of' the remaining sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, portions, or phrases of this Ordinance. The
City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each
and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase without
regard to whether any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or
phrase of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, this
,1999.
day of
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANC},tO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE SITE FOR AN OFF-LEASH
DOG AREA 1N THE CITY AND THE PROPOSED TERMS OF AGREEMENT
WITH THE FRIENDS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POOCH PARK
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council 1 :) approve the use of the
northwest comer of Etiwanda Creek Park for development of an off-leash dog area. The specific
location within the park is shown on the attached diagram. 2:) direct staff to develop an agreement
with the Friends of the Rancho Cucam.onga Pooch Park outlining duties and responsibilities,
consistent with their letter of commitment.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
During the recent months the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council have reviewed
the possibility of developing an off-leash dog area within the City. ~Ilae City Council took action to
support development of an off-leash dog area provided that a resident support group was developed
which agreed to fund raise tbr the improvements and provide the necessary maintenance to pick up
after the dogs. The City Council directed. staff to research possible sites and to work with the Park
and Recreation Commission to develop a recommendation.
Community Services and Park Development staff have evaluated all City-owned property and many
other possible sites to determine the most: feasible and least expensive options for an off-leash dog
area. As a result of this analysis, staff identified the following possible sites: the SCE right-of-way
adjacent to parking lot"G" at the Epicenter; Etiwanda Creek Park; the vacant lot adjacent to the fire
station on Banyon; the southern area at Heritage Park; the proposed Tapia Park area and the vacant
land on the northeast corner of Eighth and[ Grove. Attached as Exhibit No. 1 are photographs of the
proposed sites.
City staff attended a meeting with the Friends of the Pooch Park group on August 10th and presented
these site options. Staff recommended the northwest portion of Etiwanda Creek Park (directly north
of the parking lot and temporary storage bins) for the initial dog park location. This site currently
has clumping grass, irrigation and proximity to parking, restrooms, water and security lights. There
are currently no neighbors which would be affected by the development. Staff feels that this positive
activity at Etiwanda Creek Park would help discourage any graffiti or vandalism at the facility. Staff
noted that the challenge at the Etiwanda Creek Park will be the shortage of parking during the peak
usage hours. The members of the Pooch Park Committee were supportive of this recommendation.
J
/0.3
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RECOMMENDATION FOR OFF-LEASH DOG AREA
September 15, 1999
Page Number 2
This recommendation was presented to the Park and Recreation Commission at their meeting on
August 19, 1999. There was a large number of Pooch Park supporters in attendance at that meeting
to support the recommendation for Etiwanda Creek Park. Following discussion, the Park and
Recreation Commission took action to recommend the northwest corner of Etiwanda Creek Park as
the site for the off-leash dog area. In their presentation to the Commission, the Pooch Park
supporters presented Commission members with a Statement of Commitment, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit Number 2. In this Statement of Commitment, the Pooch Park supporters
volunteered to raise funds to establish the improvements at the park, to create a good neighbor
program with other park users, and to provide education to users of the off-leash dog area. Their
Statement of Commitment states that they will be willing to enter into an agreement with the City
defining each party's roles and obligations. If the City approves the use of Etiwanda Creek Park for
an off-leash dog area, staff will continue to work with the Friends of the Pooch Park Committee to
develop an agreement which will presented at a later date to the City Council outlining these
responsibilities.
On September 1, 1999, representatives of the Friends of the Pooch Park Committee met with City
staff and representatives of the Pop Warner Football League at Etiwanda Creek Park to review
preliminary plans for the off-leash dog area and share any' concerns. The Pop Warner individuals
were concerned with making sure that there was a six-foot fence protecting the off-leash dog area
from any of the youth football participants and that the boundaries of the off-leash area included a
buffer area from their snack bar and storage trailers. At that September 1 st meeting there appeared
to be consensus between all in attendance regarding these issues. Subsequent to that meeting,
however, the Friends of the Pooch Park Committee had additional discussions and notified City staff
that they would like for the southern end of the off-leash area to be extended even further south then
what was discussed at the September 1st meeting. The attached sketch of Etiwanda Creek Park
(Exhibit No. 3) indicates the location of the southern boundary recommended by staff and the Pop
Wamer Football League, as well as the requested boundary identified by the Friends of the Pooch
Park Committee. Staff feels that it is important to create this larger buffer space between the off-
leash dog area and the area around the Pop Warner snack bar and storage facilities. It is the opinion
of staff that this is a heavily traveled path lay football participants on a regular basis and that a larger
buffer would be more appropriate for safety purposes. Staff was also notified that Pop Warner often
sets up a portable tent to the north of the :snack bar on game days to sell additional concessions. If
the off-leash area were extended to the south, this tent would actually end up behind the dog park
when walking from the fields. It is felt that if the boundary for the off-leash dog area extends too
far south into the Pop Warner space, a conflict might be created between two distinctively different
uses.
In subsequent conversations between staff and the Pooch Park Friends, a compromise
recommendation was agreed to by both ,groups. It is now recommended that a relocatable fence
configuration be used, which will limit the dog park to the smaller space during the Pop Warner
season and will allow the off-leash area to be expanded to the south during the football off season.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RECOMMENDATION FOR OFF-LEASH DOG AREA
September 15, 1999
Page Number 3
The Friends of the Pooch Park have agreed to include this fencing enhancement in their fund raising
and will be responsible for the twice annual fence relocation.
If the City Council approves this proposal, staff will proceed to develop an agreement with the
Friends of the Pooch Park Committee for future City Council consideration. At the same time, staff
will work with the Pooch Park Committee to. finalize a recommended list of rules and regulations
for the off-leash dog area for submittal to the City Council. Once the agreement and rules are
approved, the Friends of the Pooch Park Committee would be permitted to begin their construction
of the fencing improvements and begin operation of the off-leash dog area. The initial phase of
improvements proposed by the Friends will be the necessary chain link fencing. In the future, the
group plans to bring in a drinking fountain, benches and an informational bulletin board.
The Friends of the Pooch Park Committee representatives will be in attendance at the City Council
meeting to outline their thoughts on the location and to identify their level of commitment for the
project.
Res~cJ~utly srtbm. i{t,o~l,
Kem-![McArdle
Comm~ity Se~ices Director
KM/mam
Exhibits
citycoun/poochp~1.99
Exhibi. t No. 2
Statement of Cometmerit
We, the undersigned, representing the Rancho Cucamonga P~och Park Steering
Committee, hereby commit ourselves to the following:
The committee will do all that is reasonably required to develop and operate
a Pooch Park: within the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
A. As soon as practicable.
B. The committee will raise funds, as needed, for the establishment,
maintenance, enhancement and improvement of the park.
Co
The committee will create a "good neighbor" program to address any
concerns of the current park community, or the adjoining neighborhood
both before the. opening of the park, and continuously during the park's
operation
D. Establish a program, and work. with other organizations, to educate and
enlighten the community to the responsibilities of pet ownership
Explore the feasibility of regularly scheduled events for dog owners to
promote the park and the community, together with an Opening
Celebration
F. Promote the Pooch Park as a City resource to all of its citizens
G. Create a self-governing body to oversee the park, assuring that park
users also :maintain the park as a clean and safe environment.
Create a cadre of Park Assistants whose roles will be to monitor
behaviors of beth citizens and their pets, to ensure proper park cleanup,
and where necessary to work with citizens and pets as to the proper use
of a Pooch Park
The committee will formally organiT~ itself in any :reasonable form as
might be required by the City, or others to carry out the above stated
commitments. The committee will be happy to enter into an agreement
with the City defining each party's roles and obligations.
In exchange for this commitment, the committee expects the City to
establish and maintain this park, as the City would any other park,
includi_~g electricity, water and irrigation, lawn and sod maintenance,
and garbage collection.
//7
1 t
t I
· by 'th~:,~ ~'=riends ~:~f the ~':~.a~';~c~'~(:~ {;uc~'~'~on~.la POOCH Park
~:',;ept.ernber 15~ '1999
Statement of Commitment
We, the undersigned, representing the Rancho Cucamonga Pooch Park Steering
Committee, hereby commit ourselves to the following:
The committee will do all that is reasonably required to develop and operate
a Pooch Park: within the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
A. As soon as practicable.
B. The committee will :raise funds, as needed, for the establishment,
maintenance, enhancement and improvement of the park.
The committee will create a "good neighbor" program to address any
concerns of the current park community, or the adjoining neighborhood
both before the opening of the park~ and continuously during the park's
operation
D. Establish a program, and work with other organizations, to educate and
enlighten the community to the responsibilities of pet ownership
Explore the feasibility of regularly scheduled events for dog owners to
promote the park and the community, together with an Opening
Celebration
F. Promote the Pooch Park as a City resource to all of its citizens
G. Create a self-governing body to oversee the park, assuring that park
users also maintain the park as a clean and safe, environment.
Create a cadre of Park Assistants whose roles will be to monitor
behaviors of both citizens and their pets, to ensure proper park cleanup,
and where necessary to work with citizens and pets as t:o the proper use
of a Pooch Park
The committee will tbrmally organize itself in any reasonable form as
might be required by the City, or others to carry out the above stated
commitments. The committee will be happy to enter into an agreement
with the City defining each party's :roles and obligations.
In exchange for this commitment, the committee expects tlhe City to
establish and maintain this park, as the City would any other' park,
including electricity, water and irrigation, lawn and sod maintenance,
and garbage collection.
Pooch Park Benefits:
Provides a safe place for dog owners to socialize and exercise their dogs. with
others.
~ Pooch parks help to discourage vandalism in neighboring areas.
~ Socialized dogs are better citizens, both at home and in public.
~ Dogs that are exercised regularly are healthier and less aggressive.
~ Reduces dog litter in public areas and other parks.
[_-I Provides a forum for dog owners to socialize and have fun with their pets.
~ Helps reduce the incidence of unleashed dogs in the city.
A Pooch Park is a form of outreach that promotes:
Information sharing about:
Veterinarians & Pet Hospitals
Foods and treats
Training
Breeders
Etc.
Increased compliance with animal control laws & ordinances
Awareness of civic events (via the bulletin board)
Suggested Regulations for the Rancho Cucamonga Pooch Park
2.
3.
4.
e
Posted Hours of Operation must be observed.
Dogs must be On-Leash until inside the park.
Dog litter is to be removed by owner.
All dogs must be licensed and have current
vaccinations.
Park patrons must either quiet barking dogs or remove
them from the park.
Off-leash dogs must remain in the designated fenced
area.
Off-leash dogs must be under owner's voice control at
all times.
The following are not permitted in the park:
Animals other than dogs
No more than two (2) dogs per owner
Puppies under 4 months of age
Ill or injured dogs
Females in heat
Aggressive dogs
Food
Suggested Definitions (to accompany rules sign)
Your dog is aggressive if or when it:
Regularly attacks other dogs.
Consistently refuses to leave other dogs alone.
Constantly chases, harasses, or annoys any one or
more dogs.
Keeps forcing other dogs to submit by laying
down.
Keeps mounting dogs
Dogs, like humans, have moods. On some days they may
not be in the mood to be social. Please learn how to
recognize when your dog isn't in the mood, and try again
on another day.
Suggested Warning Sign (exculpatory language for the city.)
WARNING
There are dogs of unknown temperament off-leash in
this park. You enter at your own risk. It is not
recommended that small children or the infirm enter
the park because of the possibility of being knocked over
by running dogs.
The use of this off-leash area by any dog, owner, or
person shall constitute implied consent of the dog's
owner or person to the park rules & regulations and
shall constitute a waiver of liability to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and an agreement and undertaking
to protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for any injury or damage
caused by such dog, owner or person during any time
the facility is used by the dog, owner or person.
:Problem: Page 1 o,f 13
The Case for Space
Expanding Recreational Opportunities for Dog Owners and Their Pets
A Report Prepared for
FREEPLAY
by
F, ric Batch
Matt ttale
Ellen Palersky
School of Policy? Hanning, and Development
t ~niversity of Southern Califi)rnia
Under the Direction of
Protbssor Juliet A. Musso
School of Policy, Planning, and Development
University of Southern C, alifornia
Prol~ssor Christopher Weare
Anncnbcrg Sch(x~l fbr Communication
1.1niversity of Southern California
Executive Summary:
The parks, recreatitmat areas, beaches and open spaces of Los Angeles are used lbr myriad purposes. Los Angelenos enjoy running~
walking, softbali, soccer, tennis, basketball, rugby; lawn bowling, golf, a host of other sports and play with children, families and
pets on the over 15,000 acres of open space in [x)s Angeles. Each of these recreational uses provides significant benefits to the
participants. With over 3.6 million residents in the City of Los Angeles, however, different recreational activities compete for the
limited open space available. The City Council and the Parks and Recreation Department must make a judgment on how to allocate
scarce open space. This allocation must strive to be equitable and must be responsive to the expressed demand of citizens.
We begin with the premise that creating more open space is not a politically or economically ti~asible option in space-constrained Los
Angeles. We am not asking to build more parks, beaches or recreational thcilities. Instead, we will argue that the current allocation
of open space does not meet the current demand for one type of'recreational activity: off-leash dog recreation. We conclude that
lhirness and citiz~en demand require allocation of some existing open space for use as Off4~ash Recreational Areas (OLRA).
The report vrocceds a,s fbllo.ws. In Section One we briefly present evidence to support our contention that the current allocation. of
open space tbr ot~;leash dog recreation does not meet the expressed demand of citizens. We will Ibcus our analysis on the Westside
fi le'J/C:Xwpdocs\Pt~)ch Park\The Problem.htm 9/13/1999
The Problem: Page 2 of ~ 3
of I.os Angeles where the expressed demand is particularly high. Section Two provides an overview of the benefits and drawbacks of
OLRAs to dogs, dog owners and other residents of Los Angeles. Section Three identifies key stakeholders in the OLRA issue, and
discusses the preferences of those who favor dog parks, and those who oppose them. Section Four presents criteria that attempt to
satisfy the hopes of OLRA enthusiasts while recognizing the concerns of opponents. Section Five provides information that
specifically addresses the concerns of those opposed to OLRAs. Section Six applies these criteria to five potential open space areas
on the Westside of Los Angeles that could be re-allocated as OLRAs. In tbe end, we recommend that the City of Los Angeles
designate a portion of Dockweiler Beach as an O1,RA. As we will see, this choice may not be the "best" in terms of the hopes of
OI..RA supporters~ but it is the "best" for all parties concerned and clearly the most likely to actually happen.
The case for more space...
In LOs Angeles C~mnty there are 175,000 licensed clogs, which suggests that the number of dogs is actually in excess of 300,000. In
all ofl~s Angeles County there are only 4 areas where owners are legally permitted to exercise with their dogs without a leash.
These four off-leash dog areas comprise a total of less than 10 acres of space. To begin with a fanciful example, if all the licensed
dogs in LOs Angeles descended on existing OLRAs, each park would be required to hold more than 40,000 dogs or 17,500 dogs per
acrtx More realistically, if only 1 in 5 licensed dog owners (35,000) would like to use an OI,RA, the demand is measured as 3500
dogs per acre, or 8750 dogs per dog park.
To place these figures in perspective it is helpful to compare OLRA allocation statistics with other tbrms of recreational activities.
Table One compares the figures for OLRAs to cx~mpeting recreational uses for open space~
Table One
Competing Recreational Uses
* all numbers rounded up
Softball.'
According to the City Park & Recreation o.flicials, there are 39,375 people in city organized softball leagues. To accommodate these
softball players, the city maintains 350 softball fields of approximately 3 acres each. These figures show that 1050 acres of open
space in Los Angeles are devoted to recreational softball users compared with only 10 acres dew)ted to dogs and dog owner
recreation.
Tennis.'
There are 287 city run tennis courts in Los Angeles. We estimate that given the size of a tennis court and sumrending facilities, we
estimate that 287 acres of open space are devoted to tennis extorts. According to the Soutbern California lermis Association (SCTA)
there are 40.000 dues paying members to the SCTA, in the city of [x)s Angeles. Because many tennis players do not ~)rmally belong
to the tennis association, this figure is under-estimated. We make the assumption that the number is underestimated by half and
inflate the number to 80~000 tem~is players. Spread out over 287 acres, the number ofus.ers per acre is. slightly under 300, an order of
magnitude less than the estimated 3500 users per acre of off-leash park land.
The City Parks and Recreation department maintains 13 golf courses. Based on the assumption that one golf course takes up 90 acres
of open space, an estimated 1170 acres is devoted to golfers in Los Angeles. In 1998, the City Department of Parks and Recreation
issued 35,000 "city cards" that residents can use to reserve golf times at city courses. As with the tennis example, this is clearly an
underestimate of the total number of golfers on city courses. To provide a fair estimation we inflate the 35,000 city card holders to a
total of 105,00(I regular users of city golf courses. ]laese assumptions lead to an estimated 101 golfers per acre.
file://C:\wpdocs\PoochPark\The Problem.htm 9/I 3/! 999
The Problem: Page 3 of 13
Given these figures we present the following scenarios based on the question of how much re-allocation would be necessary simply
to provide an equal allocation between OLRAs and the other recreational activities. The Ix)int of this exercise is not that dog owners
have more legitimate claims on open space than other activities. Even the most vocal OLRA activists do not contend that it is
necessary for dog owners to have an equal allocation of open space. The numbers, however, show how dramatically under-allocated
OLRA space is in Los Angeles compared to other recreational uses.
· Almost 100 times more OLRA open space would be required to provide dog owners the same recreational opportunities as
sol%all players.
· Over 3 million of Los Angelesi 3.6 million residents would have to be regular golfers to equalize the amount of open
space provided to golfi:rs as to dog owners.
· There would have to be over 1 million tennis players, over 25% of all Angelenos, to have the same number of users per
acre as dog owners currently have.
· There would have to be only 1000 dog owners in all of Los Angeles who wish to use OLRAs lbr their current allocation of
open space to equal the allocation lbr golfi:rs.
These figures clearly demonstrate that the supply of OLRAs is inadequate. Moreover, the expressed demand lbr ()LRAs is
particularly high on the Wests[de of Los Angeles. There are two citizen groups on the Wests[de devoted to the increased allocation of
OLRAs, FREEPLAY and Hermosa Beach Friends Of Dogs. No other area in Los Angeles has the level of citizen driven activism tbr
OLRAs as the Wests[de. Although statistics are not available, interviews with Animal Control officers suggest that the Wests[de has
a higher proportion of the dogs in Los Angeles county than any other area. Finally, FREEPLAY conducted a passive survey on the
week of Oct. 4. 1998 to estimate the current usage of the Westminster OI~RA. The study found that over the course of one week over
2,000 dogs used this small (.75 acres) OLRA~ making it one of the most intensively used parks in the entire city.
By tbcusing on the Wests[de of Los Angeles we are also able to consider the use of beach area as an option ;br OI~RAs. ]here are
clear advantages of beaches over parks, such as lower maintenance costs and compatibility with existing land uses. We will discuss
these advantages and some potential disadvantages of beaches in later sections.
The Benefits of Dogs and OLRAs:
Dogs or compank)n animals have become an important part of our society. Companion animals "provide many benefits which are
difficult to quantity in monetary terms, but which have important implications for the health and welfare of humans." Senator George
Vast in his "Tribute to a Dog" called dogs:
"The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world, the one that never deserts him, the one
that never proves ungratefhl or treacherous, is his dog. A manls dog stands by him in prosperity' and in poverty', in
health and sickness. lie will sleep on the cold ground, where the wintry winds blow and the snow drives fiercely, if
only he may be near his masteris side. He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer; he will lick the. wounds and
sores that come in encounter with the roughness of the world. He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were
a prince. When all other friends desert, he remains. When riches t~e wings and reputation falls to pieces, he is as
tx>nstant in his love a~s the sun in its journey' through the heavens."
Research shows that dogs are more than jnst companions. ]hey provide both physical and mental health benefits to their owners. The
importance of dogs in society has even helped spawn a new field of study, urban animal management, which aims to ensure that
animals are taken care of in the urban environment.
Off-leash recreational areas not only tbster the strong historical relationship between dogs and people, they also contribute to urban
animal management and the urban environment. We begin by outlining the obvious benefits of OI,RAs to dogs and proceed to show
how these benefits spill over to dog owners and the community at large. We will also show benefits of Ol.~RAs to dog owners and the
community at large unrelated to the benefits ofOI ~RAs to dogs.
Benefits of OLR,4s to dogs:
· Studies have shown that dogs that exercise and are allowed to run freely are not as aggressive towards peopte as dogs that
are under-exercised.
· Allowing dogs to have an off-leash area socializes dogs. It brings them in contact with other dogs and causes them to be less
aggressive in each future encounter with dogs.
· OLRAs improve the mental state of dogs. Many dog owners report that al~er a visit to an OLRA their dog is less agitated,
file'Y/C:\wpdocs\P~x~chPark\The Problem.htm 9/i 3/1999
The Problem: Page 4 of 13
more relaxed and in general nicer to be around.
These benefits were evident during a site visit to Ocean Park Dog Beach in San Diego. In an interview, John Maloney, a regular dog
park user. spoke extensively about how he regularly took his dogs to the Ocean Park OLRA without any incidence of his dogs
displaying aggressive behavior toward other dogs or human visitors at the beach.
Benefits of OLR,4s to Dog Owners;
The benefits en~joyed by dogs are also benefits to dog owners. A well-adjusted, less aggressive dog, is more enjoyable and easier to
handle for the owner. In addition there are benefits of OLRAs to owners alone. These benefits again are illustrated by dog owners
interviewed at Ocean Park Dog beach. They include:
· OLRAs provide a vita} public space allowing people to meet and form the bonds of community.
· OLRAs allow people to have the pleasure of watching their dogs at play.
OLRAs contribute to overall physical fitness of people by encouraging them to exercise with their dogs.
· OLRAs provide an opportunity for dog owners to enjoy the outside.
Benefits of OLR.4s to the CommuniO,v
OLRAs also make dogs betler members of their communities. By providing socialization and exercise opportunities OLRAs can
make dogs less aggressive, reducing the risks of dog attacks. in addition, well exercised puppies and dogs are less likely to create a
nuisance by barking excessively or destroying property.
Communities benefit in other ways that do not rest on the improved behavior of dogs. These include:
· OLRAs promote public safety. Designated spaces ti,r dogs and their owners reduces the likelihood that dogs will be let
loose in other recreational areas where they could infringe on the rights of other park: users.
· OLRAs make the surrounding area safer. Dog owners have an interest in the sati:ty of their community and can act as a
neighborh{x~d watch. In Venice Beach, where crime rates are high, the presence of dogs and their owners on the beach c~reute
an atmosphere ofsatbty. In addition, designated oflM:eash spaces reduce the resources law enforcement and animal control
officials must spend on enforcing leash laws, allowing of them to devote their time to other areas of crime prevention.
· OLRAs are a social hub for communities. Dogs often help people break the ice, allowing people who share interests to
socialize while exercising their dogs. These interacti<ms help neighbors to get: to know each other and to build a sense of
community. At a time in Los Angeles when it is often di:ffi:cuit for people to get any' sense of community, these interactions
are perhaps the most significant benefit off,red by Ol~RAs.
· OLRAs promote responsible dog ownership. All users will license their dogs, not only because the threat of a fine is
greater in an OI~RA but also because there is considerable social pressure from regular OI.RA users to do the right thing.
The s<~cial aspect of OLRAs also tend to enlbr roe the basic rules of dog ownership such as cleaning up after oneis dog and
always controlling oneis dogis behavior. Finally, O.LRA provide a centralized location fi:,r p.rox, iding owner training, pet
information, and veterinary services.
Drawbacks and concerns about OLRAs
This analysis would not be complete without identit?ing all potential draw ~backs to OLRAs. A competent I~asibility study' attempts to
identifiy all constraints, evaluate their significance given different implementation strategies, and estimate the costs and benefits of
relaxing those constraints that are not absolutely fixed. Despite the benefits and advantages of an OI,RA, there are also some
potential drawbacks. These concerns can be categorized in five areas:
· Cont¥ontations that may result within ()I~RAs.
· Dog behaviors.
· l)og waste.
· Irresponsible owners, including liability problems.
· The effbctive administration of OLRAs.
Coqfrontations':
The first set of concerns regard tbars that OLRAs will lead to various type,s of confrontations. These concerns were evident in a 1998
study conducted by the city of Hermosa Beach. After receiving several letters from residents asking lbr permission to walk their dogs
on the beach, the city council of Hermosa Beach directed staff to conduct a study. They reported several potential confrontations
including those between:
file'J/C:\wpdocs\l:~ooch Park\The Probtem.htm 9/13/1999
The Problem: Page 5 of 13
· humans and dogs.
· two or more dogs.
· dog owners.
· dog owners and other park patrons.
· dog owners and police or animal control officers.
Behavior and choracteristics of dogs;
The second set of concerns raised at various community meetings focus on the behavior and characteristics of dogs. These include the
following:
· Vick)us or aggressive dogs may disrupt the smooth operation of the OLRA.
· Dogs may carry infectious diseases transmissible to both other dogs and humans.
Dogs in heat may excite other dogs causing problems.
· Dogs wearing spiked collars may injure other dogs.
?he problem of poop:
The third major concern expressed about OLRAs is the problem with dog waste and owners who do not clean up after their dog. This
is the main argument against establishing an OLRA {m the beach. This is the primary reason why dogs. are not allowed on the beach
in tlermosa, and why FREEPLAY is having such a difficult time establishing beach space tbr dogs in Venice. There are specific
concerns that dog feces and urine can pose both an environmental and public health hazard..
Irresponsible dog owners,.
The tburth area of concern is owners who thil to take responsibility lbr their dogs. This problem is evident in the l~ar that dog owners
will not clean up. atter their dogs. On a fundamental level, this concern is driven by' the belief thin there is no easy way to hold dog
owners legally responsible. Other potential problems with dog owners include the :following:
· Owners whose dogs are not under voice control.
· Owners taking multiple dogs to OLRAs. Multiple dogs may be more difficult tbr one owner to control..
In addit[on, prnblems with irresponsible dog owners may be exacerbated by the ac~tions of others. For example, people who bring
fo{xl into OLRAs may cause dogs to fight over' it. Similarly, parents who. take small children to the OLRA may cause problems
because children and dogs otten frighten one another, leading to unpleasant reactions.
Ihe administration of O L R.,ls :
The filth and final set of concerns expressed about OLRAs deal with the effective administration of the OLRA. These specific
concerns include:
· Problems in enlbrcing the rules. Who is responsible tbr enforcement of OLRA rules?
· Funding. The creation of each OLRA entails initial start-up and continued maintemmce costs.
With this outline of cx:)ncerns about OI,RAs we now' turn to the identification of key stakeholders in the OI,RA issue.
Key OLRA stal~holders:
A number of interested parties have emerged to state their [x)sition concerning this issue. It is possible to break them down into three
groups; supporters, opponents on policy' grounds~ and opponents for 'administrative reasons.
Supporters:
Stakeholders who cleaHy support designating off-leash dog are, as (OI.RAs) include dog owners in general and advtx:acy groups such
as FREEPLAY and Hermosa Beach Friends Of Dogs. Many non-dog owners are also likely to be: included in this group because
creating a desi~,mated ()I.RA reduces the likelihood of cont~ontations with other recreational uses.
The 175,000 licensed dog owners are a formidable stakeholder because of their sheer numbers. ~l]~ey represent a potentially powerful
file://C 5wpdocs\PoochParkVFhe Problem.htm 9/13/1999
The Problem:
Page 6 of 13
electoral constituency and therefore, must be taken into account. If properly mobilized, such large numbers could come out in force to
support a referendum concerning recreational areas and could also affect the votes given to local representatives who favor OLRAs.
Moreover, the desires of responsible owners tend to be strong because they seek to provide adequate exercise for their dogs. Thus,
for them greater access to open space is not only desirable but necessary.
Consumers of urban recreational spaces are another stakeholder because they want to enjoy public spaces for sports and relaxing.
Some of these people may not like dogs, but this fact would not necessarily preclude their support for a measure allowing dogs to run
freely in a designated area, especially if creating a designated OLRA decreases the confrontations and competition for open space.
Opponents on Policy Grounds.'
The two elected official representing the Venice beach area Ix)s Angeles City council member Ruth Galanter and County Supervisor
Don Knabe, have expressed concerns over creating more OLRAs. Galanter currently appears opposed to more OLRAs. Her chief
concerns are for public health and safety. Council Member Galanter supports the findings of Ronald F. Deaton, the Chief Legislative
Analyst, that state that a potential health risk exists when humans come into contact with dog feces or are bitten by dogs. Galanter
has also been influenced by the potential costs to the city for establishing, outfitting and maintaining proper dog areas. Galanter,
however, has changed her position from time to time and in fact claims some responsibility fur the creation of the Westminster dog
park.
A concern voiced by both Council Member Gatanter and Field Deputy Tom Martin of Supervisor Don Knabeis oilice is that of
government liability tbr these off-leash areas. Since beach ownership is divided between local, county and state governments in
Calilbrnia, indemnification against liability' is problematic.
Merchants, vendors, home owners, and residents in the surrounding areas of off- leash dog areas also have an interest in this issue,
At the present time, many people walk their dogs on the boardwalks which can be disruptive to others. Their primary concern is that
creating an OI,RA will increase the number of dogs cx)ming to the beach and therefore increase the disruption caused by dogs on the
boardwalk.
Two organizations have expressed environmental concerns over increased OLRAs. tteal the Bay, an environmental organization
dedicated to protecting the Santa Monica Bay, has expressed concerns about the potential environmental problems of dog waste. The
second is the California Coastal Commission which issues permits necessary to alter the physical characteristics of beaches in
California. Chief among its concerns is potential restrictions to beach access. An oftZleash recreational area for dogs may draw the
Coastal Commissionis 'attention if it hindered full accessibility of the beach. The Coastal Commission., however, has permitted dog
beaches in other areas of California.
Finally, the Society fi~r the Protection ofAnimat (SPCA) has raised conce:ms about un-spayed dogs running free which may increase
the potential fur an-wanted litters.
Administrative opponents:
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), animal control officials? lifeguards, and employees of the Department of Beaches and
Ilarbors have vested interests in resolving questions over enforcement and access to beaches. These workers have the responsibility
of ensuring the safety and cleanliness of parks and beaches. At the present time, the LAPD assigns 30 officers a day to beach detail
in the summer months. While the officers respond to many cliffbrent complaints, they must also address those concerning dogs on
local beaches. None of these groups are anxious to police beaches or parks for dogs, resolve disputes over dog-related matters, or
handle problems with dog defecation. For example, in a report to the Hermosa Beach city council, Chief Gary Crum of the Los
Angeles Count>, Fire I)epartment Lifeguards said that they were opposed to the idea of allowing dogs on the beach because of
sanitation concerns over fetal matter on the beach and the need to enforce pooper scooper laws. }leach authorities also voiced
concerns because beach cleaning machines are not designed to pick up all l~bces left on the beach. Consequently, the operators of the
machines would be exposed to fecal material when cleaning the machines and disposing of the collected waste.
Overcoming stakeholder concerns:
This Gist of stakeholders opposing OLRAs presents significanl obstacles to the allocation of more open space to dog owners. At first,
it appears to be a Herculean task to overcome them. Taking a step back, however, the opposition to ()LiRAs stems either from a lack
of knowledge of the facts or a lack of creativity in the design of policies that can overcome the concerns. expressed by all
stakeholders. It is important to return to the fundamental problem: dog owners and their pets are provided significantly fewer
recreational opportunities cx)mpared to other users of lx)s Angeles parks. Reasoned policies. Ibr the allocation of recreational space
may overcome these impediments.
Correcting Misin.~brmation'
file://C:\wpdocs\P(w, ch ParkYFhe Problem.htm 9/13/1999
'I!1' ..........................The Problem: Page
Much of the opposition to off leash recreational areas stems from misplaced fears ;x)ncerning dogs.. Consequently, clarification and
information provision can significantly reduce opposition from certain stakeholders. Two areas are particularly prone to misplaced
lears: the dangers of dog bites and problems emanating ti'om dog fetes.
Dog Bites. A fear of an increased number of dog bites or other incidences is a major impediment to ,acceptance ofott:.leash areas.
The evidence from existing areas, however, show that th~s fear is misplaced. A report by Hermosa Beach city stall'studied several
areas that allowed dogs on the beach: lluntington, Newport? Del Mar, Cardiff, Carmel, Laguna Beach, Pismo Beach, and San Diego.
Only Huntington and Del Mar reported any instances of dog bites, and these cities only reported a small number of incidences (under
five). In contra~st, six of the eight cities reported no incidents or confrontations at a~k
Further evidence that this tear is unwarranted is that the new Westminster dog park has had no reports of dog bites since it opened.
This successful record is largely due to the significant self-policing capabilities of community groups like FREEPI.AY. Those who
tear increased incidences. of dog bites apparently ignore the important role of peer pressure in protecting against unpleasant
confr{mtations. iFinally, to the extent that OLRAs confiine dogs to spaces under community supervision, dogs are less. likely to become
involved in confrontations than, if they are roaming t?ee in other open space areas.
Health Risks from Dog Feces. The City of Ix)s Angeles has raised concerns over the possible transmission of diseases through dog
ti:ces left in oll:-!eash areas. The Chief Legislative Analy:¢t of Ix>s Angeles compiled a list twenty diseases that could possibly be
transmitted by dogs. While all dogs are subject to gastrointestinal and external parasitism, the city reports that only humans with
particularly weak immune systems such as AIDs patients and young children stand any significant chance of contracting diseases
l?om such dog-borne parasites.
Moreover. an analysis of the Legislative Analyst report by Dr. Ellie Goldstein, a leading public health expert, has shown this list to
be highly misleading. Many of the diseases listed .are not endemic t~3 Los Angeles and many others are very rare. In his words, "it is
as likely that people will get any of these listed diseases t?om their pet dog as their chance of getting hit by fighting." Based on this
analysis Dr. Goldstein concludes that the creation of new oflZleash recreational areas pose minimal risks. from a public health
perspective.
Pollution Risks from Dog Feees. In a 1996 letter to Councilmember Ruth Galanter Joel Reynolds of the Natural Resources Deftrose
Council argued that off-leash dog beaches could re:sub: in the contamination of coastal waters. Cleero water t:i)r bathers and other
beach users is certainly a high priority, and his concern is a valid one. Nevertheless, this fear is clearly repudime:d by the evidence:
the ~x:ean water offof existing southern Calilbrnian dog beaches is not any more polluted than at other beaches.
The Southern Calilbrnia Coastal Water Research Prqiect recently completed the most extensive sampling of coastal water quality
ever undertaken. This pn:~iect collected weekly samples l~om 307 sites from Point Conception to Mexico. Several of these: sites were
at existing dog beaches located at lluntington Beach, I~a,¢na Beach. and Coronado.. As seen in Table Two the recorded bacteria
levels at each of these beaches were thr below all existing and proposed standards lbr water quality. Moreover, the water quality at
these beaches was comparable to nearby beaches that did not allow dogs.
Table Two
Average Recorded Levels of Pollution Indicators (per 100mL)
[CITY Total Coli fo~xns [[ Fecal Colitbrms ]] Enterococci
[ Huntington Beach 56.7 [[ 22..3 I 7.2
[ I.aguna Beach I[ 42.,:) ...... II 32..0 [~ n/a
A major finding of the report is that the single largest contributor m elevated bacterial levels in coastal waters is storm water and
urban runoff emitted through storm drains. Clearl,, on-going and critical efttins to improve the water quality off of Southern
Cal[tbrnian beaches will be better spent attacking the main causes of this problem rather than fi:)cusing on dogs that lead to no
discernible increase in pollution levels.
file://C,:\wpdocs\Pooc:hPark\T'he Problem.htm 9/I 3/1999
The Problem: Page g of 13
Policy Opttons that Addrfss Stakeholder Concerns'
The remaining concerns of stakeholders are both valid and important. Nevertheless, they do not preclude serving the equally
legitimate demands of dog owners because these concerns may be addressed as additional open sparse is made available to dog
owners. Existing OLRAs throughout California provide a wealth of alternative techniques by dog owners can gain access while
protecting the recreational opportunities, safety, and well being of other stakeholders:
· Make a provision in the city municipal code to allow dogs on the beach in early morning and evening hours.
· Establish a permit system to allow only dogs with permits to be allowed on beach areas.
· ttave a community group sponsor the OI.RA and require it to hold orientation classes fbr owners and their dogs on
how to use OLRAs.
· Establish a reporting system lbr people to report violations of rules 'at OLRAs.
· Establish a monitoring system to enforce the rules of the OLRA.
· Enact strong enforcement policies, such as fines fi)r failure to control a dog or failure t:o dean up after a dog.
Each of these policies reduces risk by separating dogs into designated areas and by maintaining controls over their behaviors. We
will look at each concern individually, examining how such policy designs can allay the concerns of st~eholders.
Overcoming the poop problems'
One of the strongest arguments against creating OLRAs is that they will become unsanitary and unsightly because of urine and dog
waste. While the risk of disease in quite small, the chance of infection is likely to be larger when the waste is not immediately
removed. In addition, there is no argument that dog feces on the ground is smelly, unsightly, and unpleasant to be around.
The fhct remains that dogs will create waste regardless of whether or not they are on a leash. Thus the more important issue is
finding a way to ensure that waste is properly disposed of in a timely fashion. A number of effi*ctive methods have been employed to
encourage and ensure that dog owners clean up after their pets: ( i ) mandatory compliance on the part of dog owners to immediately
remove dog waste from public spaces; enforced either by the community group or through fines; (2) regularly scheduled volunteer
patrols to sweep the parks and beaches of all debris; and (13) conveniently located trash cans and waste removal bags. The use of
plastic bags, "ptx~per scoopers", and trash cans are also effective means of dealing with the problem. As evidenced by the
Westminster dog park there is considerable social: pressure lbr owners to clean up after their dogs in an OLRA. This social pressure
is not as concentrated in non-OLRA designated {)pen space~
Irre~7~onsible dog owners and liabi!iO, conferns'~
Concerns regarding liability are another significant obstacle that must be addressed to thcilitatc the creation ofOLRAs. A city that is
exposed to expensive law suits because of injuries related to OLRAs is not likely to encourage their creation. Cities have,
nevertheless, tbund a number of ways to reducx, their exposure to liability claims. Claremont dealt with the issue by creating an
ordinance. which states:
"The use of off-leash areas by a dog owner or other person having care, custody o.r control of that shall constitute
agreement by the dog owner and the person ihaving care, custody, or control of that dog t(~a waiver liability of the
city, and his or her agreement to protect, indemni$.; defend, and hold harmless the city from any claim, injury, or
damage arising from or in connection with such use."
Alternatively, cities may rely on signage. 13y signage, one means "fi~ll and complete signage, both advising visitors that the park is an
ollXleash area and that they use the area at their own risk, and advising dog owners of their assumption of liability and hold harmless
agreement.
FREEPLAY, in their proposal tbr an OLRA addressed the issue ofsignage. In their report,. they stated that it is important fi)r OLRAs
to announce designated off-leash areas so that the general public can then make an informed decision regarding access. "There are
three types of'signs that may be required: regulatory, advisory and warning si ,gns. The choice of:' sign, its location and size is
dependent on the intbrmatkm to be presented and the uses lbr which it is designed. Advisory signs are necessary at every entry point
to the area and between one access point and: another. Regulatory signs should detail reiev'ant regulatkms and corresponding fines lbr
non-compliance.'" The purpose of the signs is to improve relations within the local community by emphasizing positive messages to
encourage responsible behavior of dog owners.
The concerns about irresponsible dog owners can ye:t again be mitigated by the presence of a strong community group that helps
maintain order. The social and community aspect of OLRAs is actually a deterrent to irresponsible dog ownership. We contend that
in many ways the sell:policing evident at the Westminster dog park is more effective that: external: (city-ran) policing. As one
fite://C:\wpdocs\PoochParkVFhe Problem.htm 9/13/1999
The Problem:
P:age t0 of l 3
Westminster regular explained, "It is one thing to get a ticket iFom an anonymous cop, it is another thing to get corrected at by my
neighbor who I have to see everyday."
.4dministrative Concerns:
The administrative concerns for the most part apparently stem from the belief that OLRAs will require a significant amount of"new"
work for the various government agencies. It is certainly possible to think of ways to create an OLRA that would in fact require a
host of new work: for the agencies. For example, a new OLRA that would require regular replanting of grass w{mld require significant
on-going maintenance by city staflk A new OLRA in close proximity to other recreational activities would :require on-going
administration by animal control officers, especially if clear and definable boundaries do not exist. It is clearly possible, however, to
design new OLRAs in a way that decreases these on going administrative costs. For example, an OLRA without grass and away from
competing recreational uses would decrease these on-going maintenance costs.
A second administrative concern is the amount of start-up money 'an OLRA may require. An OLRA requiring a new l~nce, significant
new signage, and new trash cans is likely to have significant start-up costs. As with maintenance.. costs, however, it: is possible to
mini~mize these costs. For example, an OLRA located such that a new f~nce would not be required to separate dogs and other
recreational activities would be much less expensive.
The point is not that start-up costs and maintenance.. costs are irrelevant concerns. Instead we argue that these costs can and should be
minimized by the site selection process.
Criteria for new OLRAs:
Given the hopes of dog owners and the t~ars of Ol.,RA opponents, it is clear that a sound decision must be based on criteria fbr new
OI,RAs that pay close attention to all stakeholders. Moreover, given the significant opposition to OLRAs, we propose that when
accessing tradeoils, greater weight should be accorded to the concerns of opponents than the wishes of dog owners.. Given the paucity
of current OLRAs and significant opposition, we believe that dog owners are or should be satisfied with any increase in available
open space. In short, we believe that overall the best site for a new OLRA is one that minimizes the opposition and maximizes
the feasibility of a new OLRA actually being: created. The analysis up to this point suggest the [bllowing criteria are essential to
chcs)sing a successful site tbr an OLRA:
· Limit conflicting recreational uses. It appears that dual use for different recreational purposes will be difficult to manage
and maintain. It is, however, li:asible to consider some way of designating a site for off.leash exercise by hours rather than a
physical boundary. This selection criteria is designed to minimize the t~ars. about various types of "confrontations."
· Compatibility with surrounding land uses. It would be inappropriate to select a site in close proximity to a major traffic
thoroughfare tbr [i~ar of dog safety; It would also be inappropriate to site a lhcility directly adjacent to homes. Again this
criteria helps mitigate t~ars about "cont¥ontations," as well as dog behavior and irresponsible owners.
Accessibility. In order fnr a dog park to be utilized it must be accessible to. dog owners. Given the current under-allocation of
OLRA space dog owners will accept some amount of travel to get to a new facility but attempts should be made to minimize:
this travel time. In addition, to limit the fears of confrontations with people outside the OLRA it is important to consider the
availability of parking adjacent to the ()LRA.
· Strong community involvement and support. As the laundry ~ist of l~ars shows~ an OLRA is more likely to be successful
in an area that enjoys a large amount of ctm~munity support. Many of the concerns about dog behavior and irresponsible
owners can be addressed through the active involvement of a local community group. In addition, a strong and active local
organization can help alleviate many of the 'concerns about dog waste. As evidenced by tbe Westminster dog park, an
effective local group 'can create significant pressure and social norms towards responsible dog ownership.
· Start-up and maintenance costs. Tbere are some costs associated with any new OLRA. Since we are re-allocating existing
open space ibr off.leash use and given that many key stakeholders are opposed to OLRAs for administrative (cost) reasons
we should attempt. to minimi'z~ the costs involved in the process./'he potential start-up costs include additional signage,
trash cans. fencing, and water h~x~k-up if necessary. The potentia~ on-going maintenance costs include: cleanin:g, repairing
l~ncing, rep}acing grass, patrolling by city staft~. A smmg community group .can help reduce these costs. For example,
donation and ¥olunteer efforts have contributed greatly to the construction and maintenance of Westminster }'ark. In
addltiom proper site selection can reduce c~sts.
Beaches beat parks.
In an eltbrt to narrow the t'ocus we begin with a simple choice. park or beach area. Using the identitied criteria, there are clear
advantages of beaches over parks. First, beaches would have lower maintenance costs than parks. As evidenced by the Westminster
O!~RA, dogs am very hard on grass, and this is compounded by the overuse of the park. The beach sand is more resilient to the
pounding of running dogs and therefore require less regular maimchance.
Second, many beaches appear to be under-utiliz~ed especially during the winter months. In interviews, several I/os Angeles County
fi le'J/C:\wpdocs\PoochPark\The Problem.htm 9/13/1999
The Problem: Pa~e 10 of ! 3
lili:guards indicated that even on weekends during the winter it is rare to see a large number of people either playing or simply
relaxing on the sand part of the beach. Most of the 'activity is concentrated in the boardwalk areas. There are so few people on some
beaches that lifeguards estimate that they only need to patrol small sections of the beach during winter months.
While beach use increases dramatically during the summer, there are still areas of beaches where the potential conflict with other
recreation activities is limited. Although it is difficult to quantify comparative utilization of beaches over parks, several site visits
confirm that many beach areas. even on weekends, are unclerased. It is difficult to say the same thing about park areas.
Third. we consider the existing land use ofpotentlal sites. From the perspective of dog owners, a perfect ()LRA is a wide open space
where dogs can run free. Most dog owners would also prefer an area that does not become muddy during rainy weather. Since a
grassy area can quickly become a mud field with overuse. the beach area seems to be a more viable option. As one Venice area dog
owner stated, "Sand I can brush off, mud means a bath production."
Another clear advantage of beaches over parks is that picking up dog fecal matter is physically easier on a beach than in a park. All
of the existing OLRAs come equipped with shovels and rakes that owners can use to clean up after their dogs. It is often quite funny
to observe owners contorting and digging into the park to pick up after their dog. On a beach the soft sand makes clean up an easier
task, almost like a catis litter box. The sand also makes it possible Ibr dog owners to scoop up dog urine which is impossible in a
park setting. While this may seem trivial, cleaning up dog waste is a significant concern of OLRA opponents, the sand makes clean
up easier lbr dog owners and therefore increases the likeliho~xt that it will happen.
Fourth and finally, we believe that beaches oiler advantages in terms of accessibility. It is important to remember the balance
between accessibility for dog owners and protection of homeowners. Most of the small park: areas on the Westside are directly
adjacent to houses which increases the conthct between the two groups. Many of the beaches are a distance from homes decreasing
this conflict. Many beaches also have adjacent pubtic parking, which tcmds to be empty in the winter months. In contrast, most parks
in LOs Angeles have yet3~ tittle parking available.
Given these factors we concentrate our analysis on comparing difii~rent beach areas as potential sites lbr a new' OI.RA on the
Westside.
And the winner is...
There are 23 distinct beach areas in the Los Angeles region (see Appendix A). In an effort to narrow this number dowm we begin by
eliminating beaches that clearly lhil one of the identified criteria. Nine of these beaches clearly thil the accessibility criteria. Four of
these (Leo Carrillo, Nicholas Canyon, Zuma and Point Dume) require long drives on the congested Pacific Coast Highway towards
Mafibu. Four of these beaches (Malaga Cove, Abalone Cove, Point Fermin Lighthouse and Cabrilio) require long drives through the
winding roads of Palos Vetdes peninsula, making them inaccessible. We eliminate two additional beaches (Los Tunas and Topanga)
on the accessibility criteria primarily bemuse they offer insufiqcient parking.
Six of these be:aches (Santa Monica, Will Rogers, Manhattan, Hermosa, Redondo, and Torrance) present significant conflicts with
other recreational users. Much of the recreational activities on these beaches actually takes place on the sand parts of the beach. For
example, there are more than 100 volleyball courts on Manhattan Beach. In addition, five of these six beaches are surrounded by
other incorporated cities, preventing the city or county of LOs Angeles from dictating the particular uses oftbese beaches.
This process of elimination leaves live candidate beaches: Venice Beach, I)ockweiler, Marina Jetty, Playa del Rey. and Motheris
Beach. It is important to note that we are not comparing these beaches to those eliminated above but to each other. Table Three
compares each of these areas using the criteria developed above. Table Four provides a rank ordering of each of the prospective
beaches. Note that a "1" equals the top score and a "5" equals the bottom score in Table Four.
Table Three
,Alternative Criteria Matrix
fi I e'J/C :\wpdoes\PoochPark\The Problem.htm
9/13/1999
The Problem:
Beach Area
Venice Beach
Docioveiler
Conflict Potential
Very popular and high
traffic area especially in
the summer.
Lightly used. Large
stretches are often
completely empty.
Compatible Land Use
High traffic areas around
pier and pavilion area are
inappropriate.
Size of beach (wide and
over 4 miles long)
indicates it could
accommodate an OLRA
while allowing competing
uses elsewhere.
IL
Accessiblli~
Very accessible to
Westside: residents.
iParking is costly and in
short supply during
summertime.
Ample street and pay
parking. But not
particularly accessible to
Westside residents.
Page 11 of l: 3
An OLRA t
significant
support, bul
opposition.
The large Ol
parking ind
area would
to OLRA at
lack of hou,,
area sugges
opposition.
Beach Area
Marina Jetff
11
Conflict Potential
l,ittle used by other
recreational activities. lit is
in close proximity to
Venice Beach which is
highly used~
Compatible Land Use
The beach is
comparatively small and
somewhat :narrow. It is
also the is ~hirly close to
many houses. Also there is
a Tern breeding program
on beach.
Ac~:essibility
Very accessible to
Westside residents~
Parking is a potential
problem, especially during
summer.
II Communi~
Because of
this would I
thvorable Ik
supporters~
concerns wi
homeowner
Motheris Beach
This area is used primarily
by two rowing clubs to
launch boats. A potcmtial
conflict on weekends.
tile://C:\wpdocs\iPooch Park\The Problem.htm
Beach is surrounded by'
hotels on three sides
indicating a potential for
conflict.
M(nteratcly accessible to
users. Pay parking only
lead to sup[
backers.
9/13/1999
Page 12 of 13
?!aya del Rey
Observation indicates f~w
other uses.
A small beach area would
concentrating impacts in a
confined area.
Moderately accessible to
Westside users. Pay and
street parking.
Distance frt
indicates le:
Table Four
Ranking Criteria Matrix
Beach Area Conflict Compatible Accessibility Communi.~ Costs
Potential land use involvement
Ive ceBeach [5]l 5II'II ' II
II II 43 It 4 II 4
The results of these tables indicate that Dockwelter beach best fits our identified criteria tbr a new Ot. RA. Dockweiler scored highest
(a score of one) on three of the live criteria (Conflict potential, Compatible use and Costs). Dockweiler scored low t14) on
accessibility and in the middle: (3) on community involvement.
Given that the proponents of()LRAs must overcome significant opposition, Dockweiler is clearly the best choice. It is far from
potential homeowner and has iimitcd alternative recreational users, minimizing potential conflicts. The existing fenced area and high
number of trash cans indicate low start-up and maintenance costs. What Dockweiler loses in: terms of accessibility it gains in terms of
size and available parking.
A potential second choice is Playa del Rey, which ranked setxmd on three out of five categories, but: lowest on community
involvement and accessibility. ~t scored low' in these areas mainly because it is closer to housing and smaller than Dockweiler and
provides less parking.
Marina Jetty and Motheris Beach scored in the middle to bottom (mainly 3is and 4is) on all the criteria. They are both small and
pose have significant potential of conflict with existing uses.
Finally, Venice Beach dramatically shows our weighting of the three main opposition concerns (tx>nflict potential, compatible land
use, and costs) over the supporters hopes (accessibility and community involvement). Venice is clearly the preference of OLRA users
but is clearly }ess desirable ti'om the perspective of other stakeho}ders.
Conclusion:
While more areas are needed, attempts to create them Pace significant political opposition. The current allocation of space fbr off:
leash dog use ignore high expressed demand by dog owners on the Westside. We have developed criteria fi)r choosing a new OLRA
that attempt to mitigate the concerns of opponents while: attempting to serve some of the hopes of dog owners. Until OI~RA users
clearly demonstrate their ability to manage and selfXpollce an off-leash beach area, it will be extremely difficult for these users to get
their first choice of sites. The example of Westminster Dog park is clearly a step in the right direction. 'Ihe Westminster users and
FREEPlAY provide an example of how the process can work. By choosing a site that speaks directly to the concerns of opponents
I:REEPI,AY and other community based organizati{ms will have the opportunity to again prove that OLRAs provide significant
benefits to dog owners, their pets, and most importantly~ the community at large. With this added experience and track record it is
our belief that the ultimate goal of FREEPLAY of I acre of OLRA per 100 dogs can some day betx)me a reality.
fi le://C:\wpdocs\PoochPark\The Problem.htm 9/13/I 999
The Problem: Page 13 oft3
Appendix A
J
J
J
Los Angeles County Beaches
(listed from north to south)
1. Leo Carrillo State Park
1. Nicholas Canyon Beach
I. Zuma Beach~
1. Point Dume State Beach
I. Malibu Surl?ider State Beach
1. t,as Tunas State [:leach
Topanga State Beach
I. Will Rogers State Beach
Santa Monica State Beach
Venice State Beach
I. Marina Jett3 Beach
I. Motheris Beach (Marina)
Playa det Rey Beach
Dockweiler State Beach
Manhattan State Beach
Hermosa State Beach
t. Redondo State Beach
'lorrance State Beach
I. Malaga Cove
Abalonc Cove Beach
I. Point Fermin Lighthouse
1. Cabrillo Beach
I. Ixmg Beach City Beach
file'd/C:\wpdocs\P(w, ch Par k\The Problem.htm
9/13/1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 15, 1999
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager " ·
Rick Gomez, AICP, Community Development Director ~
PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL AT THE NEC OF BANYAN STR -'ET AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE ~
At the request of Council Member Bob Dutton, staff is providing a s~atus/update regarding the
proposed design and construction of a new high school at the norrheas, corner of Milliken Avenue
and Banyan Street.
On January 28, 1999, the City Planner and staff met with representatives from the school district
and recommended that the project's er~vironmental analysis include discussion about potential
impacts generated from the construcfior~ and =use of the high school. Of particular concern to the
City Plannerwere Noise, Traffic and Circulation, Public Safety, Biological Resources, and Light and
Glare.
On March 11, 1999, City staff received a letter from the Chaffey Joint Union High School District
describing their intent to acquire an approximately 55-acre parcel of land located at the northeast
corner of Banyan Street and Miiliken Avenue4 On Apdl 22, 1999, City staff via a letter
recommended that a Traffic Impact analysis should be prepared to address all traffic and circulation
issues.
On May 13, 1999, the City Council held a :special joint meeting with Chaffey Joint Union High School
District Board of Trustees to discuss specific issues related to the joint use policies between the City
and the District for the new high school site at Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue.
On June 2, 1999, City staff received a copy of the environmental analysis regarding the potential
impacts of the high school. On June 11, City staff provided comments on the analysis and
recommended, again, that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared. A copy of the letter
is provided for your convenience..
On July 28, 1999, the high school representatives hosted a meeting at the Rancho Cucamonga
High School library. The meeting was advertised in the local newspaper. According to City staff
who attended, most of the persons present at the meeting were either representatives from the
school district or from the architects firm. The presentation focused on the proposed lighting
standards for the football stadium.
During the second week of August 1999. via a letter (attached for your convenience) the Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) commented on the proposed environmental document. Of particular
concern to the Service was the protection of the alluvial scrub and chaparral. The Service
recommended that impacts from this project to alluvia~ scrub be offset by the acquisition and
protection in perpetuity of alluvial scrub elsewhere in the Eftwanda Alluvial fan.
MEMORANDUM
HIGH SCHOOL/NEC BANYON STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE
September 15, 199.9
Page 2
On August 19, 1999, City staff met with representatives from the high school district and their
consulting architectural firm. The architect presented a revised site plan layout for the site. The
school district indicated a copy of the si~te plan would be forthcoming and therefore is provided to
the Council under separate cover. Additionally, City staff recommended, in light of the low
participation during the previous meeti~g, an additional neighborhood meeting should be held to
provide the surrounding residents an additional opportunity to comment on the proposed high
school project.
The high school project has been scheduled to be reviewed on October 4, 1999, by the Chaffey
Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees. The traffic impact report is to be completed in
October.
RG:fs
Attachments
CC:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
C
April 22. 1999
Mr. John C. Grow. AIA
Director of Facilities
Charley Joint Union: High School District
211 Wesl Fiflh Sireel
Ontario. CA 91762-1698
SUBJECT: ETIWANDA NORTH - NEW HIGH SCHOOL SITE
Dear Mr. Grow:
The Cily of Rancho Cucamonga was very pleased Io learn of Ihe Dislric¢s proposal Io proceed with a
new High School site al lhe northeast corner' of Milliken and Banyan Sireel in your letter dated March
11, 1999. The City and Dislrict have a long history of working coopera/ively Io Ihe benefit of all the
studenls residing in Rancho Cucamonga. Please consider lhe comments contained herein !o be in
support of lhe Dislrict's efforls.
In response to lhe request for information telalive to providing infraslructure 1o service lhe proposed
site. we have previously !brough lhe City Engineering Oepadmenl faxed a list of' utility agencies to
Calhy Reno of your slaff. The Cilydoes not keep records of uhlity agencies' faohlies. therefore ifis
advisable to make a request to each agency.
Please note Ihal Ihe subiecl location is not currently within the Oily lirails. bul is w~lhin lhe Cily's Sphere
of Influence. In addilion. lhe sile was pre-z,2.ned as part of lhe El,wanda Nodh Specific Plan and
ellhough lhe designation is FC (Flood Control) there is a floating P/S (Park/School) designation. The
subject area also carries a polential land u:se designalion of L (Low Density). Bolh the /1callrig
Park/School and polential Low Density designation were es a reset o~ comments lrom [he County Flood
Control Districl end lhe Chalfey Join[ Union High School Dislricl. Therefore, subiecl to an adequate
Master Plan layout for the area. it would be possible for Ihe Rancho Cucemonga Planning Commission
~o make findings of consislency as provided under the California Public Resources Code section 2 115 1.
In discussing the new sile with the Cily Engineering Division some concerns with handling the traffic
circulation and street and drainage improvements were raised. The basic requirements would be to
complete frontage improvements on Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street Io lhe centerline of Ihe righi.of.
way. Along Banyan there appears 1o be a M(:lropolitan Water Dislricl easement. Therefore, streel
improvement plans will need to go through their review as well, In order Io avoid Irafile circulation
problems. the City slrongly urges the District construct Milliken Avenue northerly to V',,/ilson Avenue and
lhen W~lson weslerly about 550 feet to connect tl'~rough Deer Creek Channel. Also a traffic sludy should
be prepared to determine the need for a traffic signal at Mill,ken and Banyan.
ETIW'ANDA NORTH - NEW HIGH SCHOOL, SITE
April 22. 1999
Page 2
Bo[hMiltikenand Banyan will be heavily traveled streets. Applicable sections of these streets will be
posted/'or no stopping. The Districl is encouraged to carefully consider the parking and drop off needs
for bo(h regular and special events a( the School and design adequate onsite facilities.
The Residential development soulh of [he proposed sile did install a storm drain system crossing
Banyan to collect flows from the norlb. The colleclion poinl for lhis development occurs al the southeast
corner. The Drainage Sludy and plans are on file in Ihe City Engineering Division. Please have /he
Dislrict Engineer review the syslem and study Ihe design capacity relative to the proposed school
improvements. The conclusions of lhe Drainage Study will allow us to determine whelher a drainage
connection fee will be charged. Also, since Ihe subjecl sile is a tributary Io Day Creek Channel, a
separate assessment for the regional facililies may be needed.
Questions concerning improvemenl plans and drainage sludies for lhe. area should be referred to Mr.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, al (909) 477-2740, exlension 2362. For reference, p/ease hole lhe
following improvement plans are filed as Drawing numbers 961, 1208. t271, 1377, and 1413.
As a Responsible Agency under lhe California Environmenial Qualily Act (CEQA) the City requests thal
all notices of intent, prep. aralion and public nodces relative Io required environmental processing be
directed to me in the Planning Division.. The subject sile has some challenging environmenla~ issues
which may have mulli-jurisdicfional concerns net only at Ihe local level bul also at [he state and nadonal
leve~s. The area of environmental processing should probably b.e addressed a.l another opportunily in
the near future. Since the Oislrict is !he Lead Agency in lhis area we will await your furlher notification.
The C,ty o[ Rancho Cucamonga has a well established program of cooperation and service lo Ihe
Cha/rey Joint Union High School District. In order to conli:nue the existing C,ty service Ievels at Ihe new
si=e. the District is slrongly urged Io annex at the earlie,:.t possible time. Also please note thai these
comments are presented wilhoul benefit of a development site plan. t/' you have any questions please
calJme We are looking forward in assisting the O,slriclwilh Ibis project.
Sincerely.
COMMUNI'r'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PL.ANNI. NO .DM~ ~
/ L~e'rs~on ~lCP. Principa, P,anner
LH:Is
M.3y0r and Member= o( Cily Councd
Jack Lain AICP, C~Iy Manager
Chairman and Members 01' the Planning Commls:~i3n
R~,Ck Gomez. Commumly Oovclopmcn! O~rcc~or
Rodney Hoops. Police Captain
Ocbora~ Clark, L~bra~ Oirccto¢
Joe O' Nell. Cily Englncer
Brad Duster. C4y Planner
D,fi M~k~nanotf. Bu,ld,ng Officlat
T H E C ~ T Y 0 F
zXN
June 10, 1999
HO CU
C
C
Susan B. Sundell, Ed.D.,Director of Business Services
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
211 West Fifth Street
Ontario, CA 91762-1698
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A NEW HIGH
SCHOOL SITE LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET (GR 99-01)
Dear Ms. Sundell:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for a new
High School at the location noted above. City staff, however, continues to recommend and request
that in order to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an Environmental
Impact Report should be prepared for the Project, because the Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND) is not the appropriate environmental review document.
On January 28, 1999, the City Planner and staff met with you and Eric Vail and recommended that
an EIR should be prepared. The City Planner recommended the preparation of the EIR based on
the potential impacts generated from the construction and use of the High School. Of particular
concern to the City Planner was Noise, T,'affic and Circulation, Public Safety, Biological Resources,
and Light and Glare. Additionally, on a ~etter dated April 22, 1999, (attached for your convenience)
City staff continued to recommended that a TIA be prepared in order to address all traffic and
circulation issues. The letter also stated that: the area: of envi'ronmentat processing and review
should be address at the time we receive additional inforh3ation from your agency.
tn addition the previously indicated issues of concern, Section 15070.b.2 (Decision to prepare a
Negative Declaration or Mitigate Negative Declaration) indicates that a Negative Declaration could
be prepared only when:
The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence inlight of the whole record that the
project may have a significant effect on the environment. The information contained in the initial
study does not support the determination that a Mitigated Negative Declaration could be prepared
for the project. According to the draft biological study included in the MND, it is not known if some
mitigation measures could be fulfilled because a focus biological study has not been prepared.
Further, the biological study concludes that a focus study shall be conducted in order to determine
if the loss of a sensitive population (as a result of site development) would be considered a
potentially significant impact. If the impacts are determined to be significant and cannot be
mitigated an Environmental Impact Report shall be required.
Section 15064.g.1. of the California Environmental Quality Act indicates that if a lead agency is
presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the
lead agency shall prepare an EIR even tho~ad agency may also be presented with other
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane William.';
Jack LO1r"n, AICP, City Manage~' Councilm~:rnt)er .;~:rn,;: V Ct~r, Jtalo
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
HIGH SCHOOL SITE
June 10, 1999
Page 2
presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the
lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though the lead agency may also be presented with other
substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect (No Oil, Inc. v City of Los
Angeles (1974), 13 Cal.3d 68). It is thE: City expectation that the results of the focused biological
studies will determine that the assumed (under the biological study) mitigation measures will not
reduce the impacts (loss of sensitive biological habitat) to a level of less than significant and that
a. statement of overriding considerations will be required in order to adopt the environmental
document for the project.
Under the California Environmental Quality AcL deferring studies And analysis is not acceptable as
a mitigation measure.
Staff has the foilowing issues regarding, the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
AESTHETICS:
If the project is developed using ':he design guidelines for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan,
City staff does not expect negative impact from the project.
LIGHT .AND. GLARE:
City staff would like to receive furfher information regarding the use of lighting fixtures for the
proposed high school, specifically for the parking lot area and stadium. The MND indicates
that the lighting from the stadium will b,e screened by the proposed high school structures
and buildings. However, most of the high school buildings will not exceed one story in
height. The stadium and lighting fixtures, as proposed, will be located on the northern most
and highest section of the properly. The buildings, therefore, would need to be higher than
one story in order to shield the residential neighborhood from the stadium lights.
LANDSCAPING:
The MND indicates that landscaping ptans will be designed to ensure that enough internal
and perimeter landscaping is provided to shield the neighboring residences from light
generated by the project. Landscaping, however, will not fully screen the neighboring
residences.
AIR QUALITY:
The City wants to bring to your attention that activities from the nearbyRock and Gravel
mining operation generate considerable amounts of dust that could present a problem for
the outdoor areas of the High Schoot. Dust could cause nuisance problems at the High
School Site during Santa Ana wind conditions and it should be analyzed in the
environmental document.
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
HIGH SCHOOL SITE
June 10, 1999
Page 3
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
According to the draft biological assessment (Appendix B of the M N D, Section 4.4 Sensitive
Biolo.gical Resources, plants and wild-life), if development or construction of the site may
result in the potential loss of special plant population, it would be considered a significant
impact. Additionally, under the wildlife section (California Gnatcatcher, and the Quino
Checkerspot) if site development occurs, the loss of individuals or habitat would be
considered a significant impact. Yet the initial study indicates the impact to be less than a
significant impact. Further, the biological study recommended, in order to accurately
analyze natural habitat, focused biological studies be prepared for the Sensitive Biological
Resources from March to through September.
NOISE:
City Staff would like the applicant to prepare a Noise Study to analyze the noise generated
from the project (stadium and play fields area) the impact to the adjoining properties.
Additionally, City staff wants to make the applicant aware that the 4th Street: Rock Crusher
is located on the east side of thE: school (see attached map for details). The facility could
generate I'oud noise for any person that is using the outdoor areas of the high school.
PUBLIC SERVICES:
Under police services it is not clear whether an additional police officer will be required to
patrol the High School site. The comment from the Sheriff's department indicates that it is
likely. City staff would like to know what the response time for an emergency call for the
Chino Hlitls Station to the High School site if an on-site police officer is not required.
TRAFFIC ISSUES::
The Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) does not indicate the number of students that will
be attending this school. The analysis should indicate the number of students projected to
attend on "opening day" and the "maximum" number of students attending when the area
is fully developed,
What is the proposed boundary for this school? Where will the students be coming from?
What is the proposed walking distance limit for this school? How many students will be
expected to walk or ride a bike to school?
The MND concludes that the school will not have a traffic impact on the intersection of
Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. However, the MND does not provide any Level-OF-
Service (LOS) calculations to support this conclusion. A LOS calculation must be provided
to support findings that there will not be a significant traffic impact.
A High School will generate a significant amount: of school age pedestrian traffic. A traffic
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATICN
HIGH SCHOOL SITE
June 10, 1999
Page 4
signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street will be warranted in order
to safely accommodate the school age pedestrians traveling to and from this school. The
MND is deficient because it does not address the "safe routes to school" for school age
pedestrians, or suggest militatior~s for pedestrian impacts.
How many parking spaces are being provided for students? The MND is deficient because
it does not quantify the number o¢ parking spaces being provided compared to the projected
parking demand.
How many seats will be provided at the proposed stadium? Are sufficient parking spaces
being provided to accommodate sports and other special events to be held at the stadium?
We look forward to receiving the complete responses in the updated Mitigated Negative declaration
and Traffic Analysis. Please forward these documents to us as soon as they become available.
To expedite a prompt response from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all future documentation
related to the High School Site should be sent to the attention of Larry Henderson in the Planning
Department.
If you have any questions please contact me or Mr. Larry Henderson at (909) 477-2750. Thank you
for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
P(~VISION ~
Ri(~k Gome%
Co ur~u~_~vel o p m e n t Director
CC:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chairman and Members o.f the Planning Commission
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Eric Vail, Esq.
//9-?
United States Department of the Interior
Fish Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carls.bad, California 92008
Susan Sundell
Director of Business Services
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
211 West Fifth Street
Ontario, California 91762
1999
Ci¢ ot Rancho Cucamonc
P~'anning Division
Mitigated Negative Deciaration for t.he Proposed High School Near Milliken Avenue ano
Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Ms. Sundell:
We recently received a copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Chaffey
Joint Union High School near Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street within unincorporated San
Bernardino County and the sphere of influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed
project includes the purchase of approximately 65 acres between the Deer and Day Creek channels,
and the construction and use of temporary and/or permanent high school facilities, including
classrooms, support facilities, athletic fiekis, hard courts, lighted stadium, and paved parking and
driveway area. Because the implementation of this project will likely result in impacts to federally
listed wildlife and their habitats, we are providing comments pursuant to our responsibilities under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended, and as a Federal agency involved in project
approval under section 15082 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines.
Our primary concern and mandate is the protection of public fish and wildlife resources and their
habitats. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the "take" (e.g., harm, harassment, pursue, injure, kill) of
federally listed wildlife species. "Harm" (i.e., "take") is further defined to include habitat
modification or degradation that kills or injures wildlife by impairing essential behavioral patterns
including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. Sections 7 and 10 can authorize the "incidental take" of
listed wildlife. Incidental take is defined as take that is "incidental to, and not the purpose of, the
carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity."
If a proposed project is authorized, funded., or carried out by a Federal agency, and may affect a
listed species, then the Federal agency must consult. with us on behalf of the applicant, pursuant to
section 7 of the Act. In other words, any ,tctivity on private land that requires Federal involvement
(e.g., issuance of a section 404 permit under the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers) and that may affect listed speciies must be reviewed by us to insure that the continued
existence of the species would not be jeopardized. During the section 7 process, measures to avoid
and minimize project effects to listed species and their habitat will be identified and incorporated
into a biological opinion that includes an incidental take statement that authorizes incidental take by
the Federal agency and applicant.
Susan Sundell 3
trivirgata rosafusca), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus
californicus bennettiO, and Los Angeles pocket mouse ( Perognathus longimembris brevinasus).
We agree with the finding in the MND that the proposed project will affect regional habitat
conservation planning. The protection of remaining aI!uvial scrub and chaparral will be a high
priority in the MSHCP, and the continued unmitigated losses of blocks of sage scrub likely will pose
problems for County of San Bernardino in their effort to develop a viable preserve system. However,
we do not concur that the proposed mitigation measure (i.e., future focused surveys for sensitive
species) is sufficient to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Due to the imperiled status
of alluvial scrub and alluvial chaparral throughout southern California, and their importance for the
survival and recovery of listed species and species that are proposed to be covered in the MSHCP,
we recommend that mitigation be required for any impacts to these community types, even if they
have been previously disturbed and arc new recovering. Replacement rates for impacts to alluvial
scrub and/or alluvial chaparral should be, at least, 3 acres of scrub or chaparral preserved in
perpetuity for each acre destroyed or degraded, although somewhat lower ratios may be applicable
for highly disturbed areas or monotypic patches of scrub. In addition, we recommend that impacts
from this project to alluvial scrub be offset by the acquisition and protection in perpetuity of alluvial
scrub elsewhere on the Etiwanda alluvial fan. An endowment for the management of the acquired
land in perpetuity should be established and, prior to any transfer and dedication of mitigation lands,
the title and related documents must be reviewed for conflicting easements and prior dedications that
conflict with the: conservation of natural open space:.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the MND. If you have any questions pertaining to
these comments, please feel free to call P.J. White of my staff at (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
~"~ A. Bartel
Assistant Field Supervisor
1-6-99-HC-306
CC:
Glenn Black, California Department of Fish and Game
Randy Scott, County of San Bernardino Land Use Services Department
r'~£CEiVED: g 8-99; t 3:4,9;
$ep 08 99 02:41p
gOg 467 5171' => g CUCAItONGA ,$01g DEV; #1
ChaFFe~ School Distpict
(909) 487-~177
p.1
Chaffey Joint
211 WES~ F:F"m, S'rR~T, OrnAR~O, C^u~;ORrt~^ 91762- [698" (9~9], 988-8511 · FAX (909) 98~-t 164
To;
FFo~a;:
MEMORANDU~
Brad Buller, Planning Director,
City of Rancho Cucamonga /~
Barry W. Cadwallader, Superintendera,
ChaffBy Joint Union High School District
A.~te Loma tt,gh School
Canyon, View High School
Cha[[ey Adult Sch~
Chaff~y Comrnumty D~F ~hool
Qhd~y H~I~ School
,~ontcl~ir High ~haol
Onmrm High
Rancho Cucamonga ~gh
Val~y View H~h S{hool
Sub. ject: Discussion of Prot~ess for High SchooI/Ill
[)ate: Septemir 8, 1999
it is the understanding of this .affice that a discussion of tligh School #8 has been
agendir~xl for your September 15, 1999 City Council Me~ting. The staff of the Chafiky
Joint Union High School District is eager and willing to provide you with any
information you need for this and any future meeting.
An g % x 11 site plan is being faxed to you reader separate cover by WLC Architects.
This firm is the architectural firm designing High School #8. One of ~e featre'es of this
new plan is an increase in the number of parking stalls. Under the old plan, the number
of cars that could be parked was 746. The new number of cars that can be parked is 969.
Additionally, the District is working with City Staff to establish Special Event Parking.
Another concern from previous meetings was that there was no parking near the baseball,
softball or soccer fields.. You will notice that on the new site plan them will be 182
parking stalls near these fields.
The Board of Trustees wishes me: to intbrm you that at any time the City Council wishes
to have another joint meeting or if one or two members of the City Council wishes to
meet with a like number of School Board Members, the Board would be more than happy
to make ,such arrangements.
Thank: you for your interest in High School #8. The excellent working relationships
between the City and the District will help see this project through to the benefit of both
of our constituencies.
. ,.i:.....__.. Plan
CITY OF RANCt.t() C[IC:AMONGA
S T,AiF iF RE, iP O R T
iDATE:
TO:
iFROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
September' 15, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City M~aager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's re. quest to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, iprojects and ew~nts, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues,
projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park
Design/Development and Maintenance sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Eftwanda Creek Park:
· The soccer fields at Etiwanda Creek, Church, and Bear Gulch Parks were striped for the
Aztec Soccer Tournament.
Central Park:
· A public hearing for the project was held at the September 1 ~t,. City Council meeting for the
district fommtion, as well as the environmental review.
Windrows Park:
The Security Lighting Project is in the finalization stages with the contractor completing
punch list items. The final time clock that will control the west pasco lights has been
scheduled fbr installation.
Ellena Park:
The ivy that was planted to cover the walls at the park is serving as an excellent deterrent to
graffiti.
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND Rt~;CREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 2
Bear Gulch Park:
· The construction fence for the soccer field renovation was removed
Church Street Park:
· Staff has met with the lighting consultant to begin the lighting project for the park.
Various Parks:
Quarterly' playground inspections were completed at the following parks: Coyote Canyon,
Hermosa, Vintage, Victoria Groves, Kenyon, Heritage, Spruce, Ellena, Milliken, West
Greenway; Church, and Windrows.
Play equipment fbr Phase II of the ADA Tot Lot Renovation. Project has been shipped and
will be ready for installation by the: end of September. The first park to be modified in Phase
II will be Windrows Park..
The drinking fountains have been ordered and. replacement of the fountains for compliance
with the ADA should begin in approximately four weeks.
iLions West Community Center:
Per the Community Service Department' s request, the existing vinyl flooring in the Filippi Room
will be replaced with carpeting. It is anticipated that the carpeting will be available for
installation by the end of September.
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center:
· Comer guards have been installed throughout the interior building, and chair guards have been
installed in the Mission Room.
Installed new carpet in the Thompson Room and in the three offices at the Center.
iRancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park:
The ballfield ADA ramp project has been advertised and the bid opening is scheduled for the end
of September, and work will begin after the season has ended.
· Sports Complex crews are performing extensive softball infield renovations, including mixing
and re-leveling the brickdust.
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 3
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Seniors:
· Arrangements have been completed with Chaffey Adult School to add three (3) new free classes
at the Senior Center beginning in September. These new classes include: Creative Writing,
Literary (Book)Club, and Drawing. This now brings the total classes offered for seniors through
the Adult School to seven (7). Others classes include: Computers for Seniors, Spanish, Oil
Painting, and English as a Second Language (ESL).
As part of a continuing grant the City was awarded $3,000 from the Department of Aging and
Adult Services for 1999-2000. The timds are used to enhance senior programs. This past year
5 new classes and marketing tools were implemented through the grant. Under this year's
program six (6) additional free classes for seniors will be offered beginning in September. They
include: Ceramics for Seniors, Genealogy, Autobiography, Tai Chi, Senior Fitness, and Flex and
Stretch Exercises.
Other new classes that will be introduced in September at the Senior Center include:
Beginning Square Dance, Photography Club, and a Hospitality/Welcoming Program.
An updated version of the Communi .ty Resource Directory and the monthly Silver Fox
publication will be included on the City Web page beginning in September.
A Hawaiian Luau was held at the., Senior Center on Thursday, August 26th . This annual
"vacation" to the sandy beaches included refreshments, entertainment and door prizes. One
hundred fifty (150) seniors enjoyed[ the get-away complete with decorations and music while
wearing their favorite Hawaiian at:tire. This event was co-sponsored by the V.I.P. Club.
The Autumn Leaves iFashion Show will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday, September
25th , at 10:00 a.m.. Don't miss this spectacular event that is co-sponsored by the V.I.P.
Club. A light salad luncheon will be served and you will get an up close look at hot, new
fashions ibr the upcoming fall and winter seasons. Tickets are $5 per person. All proceeds
will go to purchase new bingo cards for use at the Senior Center.
The Senior Advisory Committee will hold their next meeting at the Senior Center on
Monday, September 25th, at 9:00 a.m.. iRecruitment for the Committee should be complete
by that time which will bring membership on the Committee to eighteen (18).
Teens:
The Teen Center concluded a successfBl summer on September 3rd. Over four thousand
(4,032) teens attended this summer, with Friday nights being especially popular. Average
daily attendance was sixty-two (62).
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 4
The Teen Learning Center (TLC) volunteers received certificates and pats on the back for
a job well done this summer. These hard working teens give vital support to our summer
programs including: Day Camp, Kid Explorers, Sports Camp, Play Camp, Pee Wee Sports,
and the Performing Arts Academy. One thousand four hundred twenty-six (1,426) hours
were volunteered by' 3.4 teens during the course of the summer.
The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) is gearing up for their school year schedule with
their first meeting scheduled in October. The teens will be planning their calendar of
activities and signing up to volunteer for the twice monthly Night on the Town Babysitting
Program, and the Founder's Day Parade and Celebration.
The 3rd Annual College Fair returns on October 21 st. Staff has been working on a committee
with representatives t~om each local high school since spring. The College Fair attracts
nearly 100 colleges and universities and over 2,000 teens and parents from the community.
Lewis Retail has again agreed to donate a store font location for the event. For the third year,
we will be in the old Ben Franklin space on Foothill Boulevard in the Terra Vista Town
Center.
Interviews for the new Teen Coordinator position are scheduled for early to mid-September.
Staff is hopeful that the successful candidate could begin by early - mid October.
Staff is moving forward with their proposal to work with Vineyard Junior High School and
the Alta I,oma School District on developing a second teen center at Vineyard Junior High.
Staff and school officials are working together to create a collaborative program, that could
also include outside youth agencies such as the YMCA. Research is on-going as to the
location. of the portable bnilding and set up costs.
Youth Activities:
Playschool, begins in mid-September offering twenty-nine (29) classes and serving over four
hundred fifty (450) children. Before the program even started, additional classes had to be
added to the fours and fives age group. The program operates at three sites: Lions Center
East, Hillside Community Church and the Mulberry Learning Center.
Boxing:
Staff has spoken with the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA and has been informed that
the Y has entered into an agreement with a local business, Body Shots, to offer a non-contact
boxing program for the community.
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIF, S UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 5
Youth Sports:
The Summer Youth Basketball program concluded with playoffs on September 11 th and
September 18th . Over six hunch'ed fifty (6501) children ages six (6) to seventeen (17)
participated on seventy-two (72) teams this Summer.
One hundred sixty (160) boys and girls ages six (61) to fifteen (15) participated on eighteen
(18) teams during the Summer 'Youth Roller Hockey pro,gram. Playoffs concluded on
September 11th
Pee Wee Soccer has over three hundred (300) boys and girls ages 3-5 registered for the Fall
program. The program runs from September 20th through November 4th at Red Hill
Community Park.
RC Family Sports Center:
One hundred eight (108) men are participating on twelve teams for the Full Court Basketball
Leagues.
Co-ed Volleyball has seventy-two (72) men and women participating on eight (8) teams.
Eight (8) men are participating in the Adult: Racquetball League.
Fifty-four (154) girls ages ten (10) to twelve (12) are participating on six (6) teams in the
Youth Volleyball. League.
One hundred forty (140) boys and girls ages six (16) to thirteen (13) are participating on
fourteen (14) teams in the Youth Indoor Soccer leagues.
The Youth Organized Basketball classes have ninety-six (96) boys and girls ages six (6) to
twelve (12) participating in nine (9) classes over an eight week period.
The facility continues to be busy. During the month of August, 1999, facility usage for
open/drop-in play was as follows: Adult Basketball - 209; Youth Basketball - 92; Adult
Racquetball- 444; Youth Racquetball- 73; Adult Volleyball- 110; Youth Volleyball- 36.
Adult Sports:
The Adult Softball Leagues have two thousand five hundred ninety-two (2,592) men and
women participating on one hundred sixty-two (162) teams.
CITY COUNCIL
iPARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 6
Registration is currently being accepted for Adult Soccer and Adult Flag Football while the
soccer fields are being renovated. The league will begin in November.
Trips and Tours:
The following trips are scheduled during the reporting period:
Danish Days in So.lvang - Saturday, September 18, 1999. Held annually since 1936, Danish
Day is the "town folks" celebration of all things Danish. Lunch is on your own, so you can
sample the local Scandinavian restaurants. A second bus has been added. Cost: $16 per
person. (Sorry, trip sold out.)
J Paul Getty Museum - Friday, October 29, 1999. Visit this world famous museum and
gardens featuring spectacular architecture and views of the historic Sepulveda Pass. At the
museum you'll see paintings by many of the most familiar masters - Rembrandt, Goya,
Monet, and C6zanne, to name a few. A very special. day to remember. Cost: $17 per person.
(Sorry, trip is sold out.)
Palm Springs Follies - Tuesday, November 2, 1999. Step back to the 30's and 40's for a
fabulous musical revue in the tradition of the Ziegfeld Follies! You will have time prior to
the show to enjoy a lunch on your own. Cost is $48 per person. (Some seats still available.)
Universal Amphitheater - "Rockettes" - Tuesday, December 21, 1999. The Universal
Amphitheater will showcase the famed Rockettes performing special holiday dances. These
Iong-limbed beauties from Radio City Music Hall show off the intricate routines and eye-
catching kicks that have made them a legend in the world of dance. Cost: $55 per person.
(Seats are still available.)
Metrolink to the Rose Parade - Saturday, January 1,2000. The world famous Rose Parade
will be even bigger and better in the new millennium. Ride the Metrolink train to Arcadia
and then board buses that will take us to our grandstand seats on Colorado Blvd. Cost is $75
per person and includes the train fide, grandstand tickets, and a box lunch. (Some seats are
still available.)
Multi-Day Trips and Tours. Since the introduction of multi-day trips in April, there have
been forty-one (41) clients register for ten (10) separate trips costing a total of $49,723 for
an average of $1,213 per person.. The City receives 10% of the total cost of the trip,
excluding taxes paid by the participant. An unique part of our multi-day trips is that
passengers can be picked-up and[ returned directly to their homes. A new list of trip
destinations for next year will be available in October.
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 7
Human Services:
Caregiving Classes - A series of eight ('.8) classes for caregivers of adults with brain
impairing conditions will be held at the Senior Center beginning in September. The Inland
Caregiver Resource Center will conduct these classes.
"No Senior Crime in '99". The Police Department will conduct a series of three (3) special
crime prevention seminars each month beginning on September 20th . The workshops
:include: "Schemes, Scares & Flimfiams" (September 20th ), "Personal Salty For Seniors
at Home andAway" (October 18t~h ), and "Home andAuto Security" (November 15t~ ).
Senior Health Fair, E.xpo~ and Fl~u Clinic will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday,
October 9th,~ from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.. Forty (40) agencies will be available at display
booths to :inform the public on heai'th issues. Heritage Hospital will administer the Flu Clinic
The new 1999-2000 editions of' the Community Resource Directory, the Child Care
Directory, and the Housing Directory have been revised and will be ready for distribution at
the end of September, 1999.
Keepsake: A Program On Memory, Aging and Alzheimer's will be offered at the Senior
Center on Monday, September 20th , at 1:00 p.m.. This is part of a of new health lecture
series made: possible through a gnmt by Blue Shield of California.
A Bereavement Support Group is being fomaed at the Senior Center through Pacific Hospice
International. This group will meet on the first and third Thursdays each month at 1:00 p.m.,
beginning on October 7th.
A new 6-part Financial Series for Senior Women will be introduced in September through
Edward Jones Investments.
Facilities:
Lions Center West and Lions Center East, are p:roud to host the newly re-vamped Holiday
Craft Fair on December l0th (15-9 p.m.) and December 11th (8-4 p.m.). Staff has formed a
committee and is working on bringing a quality event to the Centers. The Centers have
successfully collaborated on other events including the Community Services Department
Open House.
A beautifhl :new carpet has been installed in the Senior Center Thompson Room and offices.
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREAT}ON FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 199'9
Page 8
During the reporting period there are five events scheduled for the Heritage Park Equestrian
Center. They include the General Meeting for the Alta Loma Riding Club from 6:30 p.m. -
8:30 p.m. on September 24th; a Poker Ride/Lunchby Alta Lorna Riding Club on September
25th from 12:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.; Citizen Patrol has a Training Day on October 2"d from 8:00
a.m. - 5:00 ip.m.; .Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy has their 2"a annual Regional Disabled
Show on October 9th from 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.; and October 1 lth is the 4-H General Meeting
from 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Contract Classes:
Total enrollment tbr Summer classes was three thousand one hundred thirty-two (3,132).
The Fall session of contract classes began on September 11 th. Over 150 different classes are
being offered with 350 different individual class sessions to choose from. Some new classes
for Fall include: Family Fun Ceramics; Special Classes :for Special People (adaptive
ceramics), Clay Magic, Arts and Cratts, Dry Brushing Ceramics, Glass and Tile Painting,
Decorative Furniture (design, color and finish), Lindy Hop Dance, Women's Hiking Club,
How to }lave your Own Radio Show.
Community Wide Special Events:
Movies In The Park - The six week movie program ended Friday August 20th. All movies
began at dusk and were held at Red Hill, Windrows, and Milliken Parks. TRAC (Teen
Recreation Activity Club) snack bar was available at each movie and brought in $2,200.00
in sales. The staff at the movie series estimated 10,600 people in attendance over a six (6)
week period. Citizen Patrol staff attended all movies and was instrumental in making the
parks a safe environment for community members to enjoy an evening movie in the park.
Concerts In The Park - Our summer Concerts In The Park series held its last performance on
August 26th. The: (8) week series began in early July and featured a variety of music (Oldies,
Jazz, Country, Rock, Caribbean, Swing: and R&B). All concerts were held at the Red Hill
Amphitheater on. Thursdays at 7:0(} p.m.. TRAC (Teen Recreation Activity Club) snack bar
was available at each concert and ]brought in $1,900.00 in. sales. The Concert Program was
a great success, thanks to our local communi:ty sponsors. For the series we estimate that
attendance was 12,250. A special thank you once again to the Citizen Patrol for helping out
at the concerts.
Spruce Ave:nue Skate Facility Cornpetition Demonstration and Safe .ty Clinic - The second
annual Spruce Avenue Park Competition, Demonstration, and Safety Clinic was held on
Saturday, August 21, 1999, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. There were seven hundred (700)
skaters, friends, and family members en. joying demonstrations, contests, music, and
CITY COUNCIl,
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 9
giveaways. The event was sponsored by the Community Services Department and Grace
Community Church. Co-sponsors included: Active Ride Shop, Jer's Board Shop and
Cellular Skate. These merchants provided merchandise booths and giveaways through out
the day. The demonstration was ]held by Active Ride Shop and Jer's Board Shop and the
competition and the safety clinic was put on by Grace Community Church and Active Ride
Shop. The skaters and families in attendance indicated that they really enjoyed the event and
would like more skating events at the skate facility.
iRancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy:
Comedy iNight "A Taste of Terra 'Vista" - Approximately one-hundred four (104) audience
members enjoyed an evening of great food and laughter. Romano's Macaroni Grill, Boston
Market, Pick Up Stix Chinese Cuisine, 42nd St. Bagel, Hometown Buffet, Taco Factory, and
Quizno's Classic Subs provided unlimited amounts of their specialties during the early
portion of the evening. Comedian, Tim Jones kept everyone laughing while Mind Reader,
David Winston amazed people with his extraordinary psychic powers. Hypnotist, Joe Mystic
turned andience members into the most comical entertainers of the night. The Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commerc, e provided a no- host bar and donated $150.00 from their
profits to the Academy fund. iLinens and tables were donated by Abbey Rentals of Upland,
chairs were donated by Classe Rentals and centerpieces were provided courtesy of the Sons
of Italy o:f Fontana.
Theater Production Workshop - A final performance was held on Friday, August 12t~ that
was written, directed, produced, and featured the students from the workshop.
Approximately sixty (60) family members and friends attended the performance.
Vocal Expression & Performance Workshop - A final performance was held on Friday,
August 27th at 7:00 p.m. that featured the students from the first and second six-week
workshops. Approximately sixty (60) students ages 9-72 perfbrmed a variety of songs from
classical. to pop.
Based on the success achieved vhth workshops, performances, and special events held
throughout the summer, plans are underway to continue the Academy through February,
2000. ~ll~e new series of workshops, performances, and special events will begin the first
week of October, 1999.
Park and Recreation Commission:
The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Commission's August 19, 1999 meeting:
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 199'9
Page t0
· Consideration of possible sites and associated costs for locating an off-leash dog area in the
City.
· Review of Community Services Department FY 1999/2000 budget.
· Review of senior and human services ntission statement and FY 1999/2000 goals.
· Update and discussion regarding the 1999 Founders Day Parade and Celebration.
· Quarterly update of the Community Services Network~
· Consideration and discussion of traffic issues regarding Red Hill Community Park.
· Update and establishment of agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee.
· Update an.d establishment of agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee.
· Update on Central Park Task Force.
· Update on the General Plan Task Force.
· Update on the Community Foundation.
iRancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· A joint meeting between the Community iFoundation and the City Council was held on
August 10, 1999. At: this meeting a discussion took place regarding goals and objectives for
the Rancho Cucamonga C, ommunity Foundation.
Epicenter:
The following activities took place at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter during the reporting period:
· Backyard Productions - Bud Lite commercial - August t 3, 1999.
Staff is working with the following representatives tbr tkture events at the Epicenter:
· Enterp:rise Car Sales - Used car sale (September 17 & 18, 1999)
· Dr. Robert J. Houchin - Claremont McKenna Coll.ege Girls Softball vs King and His Court
(September 28, 1999)
CITY COUNCIL
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
September 15, 1999
Page 11
· Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters Association - Celebrity Softball Game
(October 10, 1999)
· Community Services Department - Children's Concert (April, 2000)
· Calvary Chapel Rancho C, ucamonga - Easter Sunrise Service (April, 2000)
· San Bernardino County Sheriff's West Valley Search and Rescue Team - Fun Run and Safety
Fair (April, 2000)
· San Manual Indian Bingo & Casino - Concert (Summer, 2000)
· Byway Entertainment- Concert (Summer, 2000)
· Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation (June, 2000)
· Ontario High School - Graduation (June, 2000)
· Police/Fire Year 2000 Softball and Football Games (June-July, 2000)
Staff is unable to inform applicants of the Epicenter's availability for year 2000 events pending the
release of the year 2000 Quakes schedule.
Respectfully sub!Ixil~d,
Rick Gomeq~
Comn~unity DevetolSment Director
Community Services Director
I: tCOMMSER VlCITYCOUNt9. 9'9. wpd
130